instruction
stringclasses
1 value
input
stringlengths
1.14k
484k
answers
sequencelengths
1
1
input_length
int64
194
85k
total_length
int64
194
85k
length_bucket
int64
1k
128k
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: access to large data sets on human activities and interactions has long been limited by the difficulty and cost of gathering such information . recently , the ever increasing availability of digital traces of human actions is widely enabling the representation and the analysis of massive amounts of information on human behavior . the representation of this information in terms of complex networks @xcite has led to many research efforts because of the naturally interlinked nature of these new data sources . tracing human behavior in a variety of contexts has become possible at very different spatial and temporal scales : from mobility of individuals inside a city @xcite and between cities @xcite , to mobility and transportation in an entire country @xcite , all the way to planetary - scale travel @xcite . mobile devices such as cell phones make it possible to investigate mobility patterns and their predictability @xcite . on - line interactions occurring between individuals can be monitored by logging instant messaging or email exchange @xcite . recent technological advances further support mining real - world interactions by means of mobile devices and wearable sensors , opening up new avenues for gathering data on human and social interactions . bluetooth and wifi technologies give access to proximity patterns @xcite , and even face - to - face presence can be resolved with high spatial and temporal resolution @xcite . the combination of these technological advances and of heterogeneous data sources allow researchers to gather longitudinal data that have been traditionally scarce in social network analysis @xcite . a dynamical perspective on interaction networks paves the way to investigating interesting problems such as the interplay of the network dynamics with dynamical processes taking place on these networks . in this paper , we capitalize on recent efforts @xcite that made possible to mine behavioral networks of face - to - face interactions between individuals , in a variety of real - world settings and in a time - resolved fashion . we present an in - depth analysis of the data we collected at two widely different events . the first event was the infectious exhibition @xcite held at the science gallery in dublin , ireland , from april @xmath0 to july @xmath0 , 2009 . the second event was the acm hypertext 2009 conference @xcite hosted by the institute for scientific interchange foundation in turin , italy , from june @xmath1 to july @xmath2 , 2009 . in the following , we will refer to these events as sg and ht09 , respectively . intuitively , interactions among conference participants differ from interactions among museum visitors , and the concerned individuals have very different goals in both settings . the study of the corresponding networks of proximity and interactions , both static and dynamic , reveals indeed strong differences but also interesting similarities . we take advantage of the availability of time - resolved data to show how dynamical processes that can unfold on the close proximity network such as the propagation of a piece of information or the spreading of an infectious agent unfold in very different ways in the investigated settings . in the epidemiological literature , traditionally , processes of this kind have been studied using either aggregated data or under assumptions of stationarity for the interaction networks : here we leverage the time - resolved nature of our data to assess the role of network dynamics on the outcome of spreading processes . at a more fundamental level , simulating simple spreading processes over the recorded interaction networks allows us to expose several properties of their dynamical structure as well as to probe their causal structure . the paper is organized as follows : first , we briefly describe the data collection platform and our data sets in section [ data ] ; in section [ static - properties ] we discuss the salient features of the networks of interactions aggregated on time windows of one day . these networks are static objects , carrying only information about the cumulative time that daily each pair of individuals has spent in face - to - face proximity . section [ dynamic - properties ] analyzes the dynamical properties of face - to - face interactions between conference participants and museum visitors . section [ resilience ] further characterizes the aggregated network structures by investigating the effect of incremental link removal . finally , section [ information - diffusion ] investigates the role played by causality in information spreading along the proximity network , and section [ conclusions ] concludes the paper and defines a number of open questions . the data collection infrastructure uses active radio - frequency identification devices ( rfid ) embedded in conference badges to mine face - to - face proximity relations of persons wearing the badges . rfid devices exchange ultra - low power radio packets in a peer - to - peer fashion , as described in refs . exchange of radio packets between badges is only possible when two persons are at close range ( @xmath3 to @xmath4 m ) and facing each other , as the human body acts as a rf shield at the carrier frequency used for communication . the operating parameters of the devices are programmed so that the face - to - face proximity of two individuals wearing the rfid tags can be assessed with a probability in excess of @xmath5 over an interval of @xmath6 seconds , which is a fine enough time scale to resolve human mobility and proximity at social gatherings . false positives are exceedingly unlikely , as the ultra - low power radio packets used for proximity sensing can not propagate farther than @xmath4-@xmath7 m , and a sustained excess of packets is needed in order to signal a proximity event . when a relation of face - to - face proximity ( or `` contact '' , as we will refer to it in the following ) is detected , the rfid devices report this information to receivers installed in the environment ( rfid readers ) . the readers are connected to a central computer system by means of a local area network . once a contact has been established , it is considered ongoing as long as the involved devices continue to exchange at least one radio packet for every subsequent interval of @xmath6 seconds . conversely , a contact is considered terminated if an interval of @xmath6 seconds elapses with no packets exchanged . for a detailed description of the sensing platform and some of its deployments , see refs.@xcite . the deployments at the science gallery in dublin @xcite and at the ht09 conference in turin @xcite involved vastly different numbers of individuals and stretched along different time scales . the former lasted for about three months and recorded the interactions of more than @xmath8 visitors ( more than @xmath9 face - to - face contacts recorded ) , whereas the latter took place over the course of three days and involved about @xmath10 conference participants ( about @xmath11 contacts ) . behaviors are also very different : in a museum , visitors typically spend a limited amount of time on site , well below the maximum duration permitted by the museum opening hours , they are not likely to return , and they follow a rather pre - defined path , touching different locations that host the exhibits . in a conference setting , on the other hand , most attendees stay on - site for the entire duration of the conference ( a few days ) , and move at will between different areas such as conference room , areas for coffee breaks and so on . the coverage of the community was different in both settings . at the science gallery , visitors were equipped with a rfid tag upon entering the venue , as part of an interactive exhibit , and therefore almost the totality of them were tracked . on the other hand , at ht09 , about 75% of the participants volunteered to being tracked . this sampling may introduce some biases in the results . sampling issues are also commonly encountered in the study of static complex networks @xcite . reference @xcite has shown that for a broad variety of real - world deployments of the rfid proximity - sensing platform used in this study , the behavior of the statistical distributions of quantities such as contact durations is not altered by unbiased sampling of individuals . on the other hand , we can not completely rule out that a systematic bias is introduced by the selection of volunteers , if volunteers and non - volunteers have different behavioral patterns . accurately checking this point would require monitoring an independent data source for face - to - face contacts , and because of scalability issues this would be feasible only for small control groups . issues regarding the effect of missing data and incomplete sampling on the properties of dynamical processes unfolding on the networks also deserve attention and will be the subject of future investigations . we start by analyzing aggregated networks of interaction obtained by aggregating the raw proximity data over one day . this aggregation yields a social graph where nodes represent individuals , and an edge is drawn between two nodes if at least one contact was detected between those nodes during the interval of aggregation . therefore , every edge is naturally weighted by the total duration of the contact events that occurred between the tags involved , i.e. , by the total time during which the corresponding individuals have been in face - to - face proximity . the choice of daily time windows seems quite natural in our settings . it would represent , for instance , a typical time scale for a description of articulated social networks based on surveys , in which each participant would ( ideally ) declare who s / he has encountered during the course of the day . such a choice for the duration of the time - window , albeit natural , is by no means unique @xcite . for instance , it is possible to aggregate the data over longer periods of time ( weeks or months ) to investigate the stationarity of the collected data @xcite . shorter aggregation times of the order of a few minutes are also useful , for instance , to resolve circadian activity patterns at the venue under investigation . figure [ aggregated - networks ] displays the aggregated contact networks for june 30@xmath12 at the ht09 conference ( top left ) , and for three representative days for the sg museum deployment . despite the large variation in the number of daily museum visitors , ranging from about @xmath13 to @xmath14 , the chosen days illustrate many features of the sg aggregated networks , in particular the presence of either a single or two large connected components ( cc ) in the network . days with smaller numbers of visitors can also give rise to aggregated networks made of a larger number of small isolated clusters . as shown in fig . [ nclusters ] , depending on the number of visitors the number of cc can in fact vary substantially . for a large number of visitors , typically only one cc is observed . for a low number of visitors , on the other hand , many clusters are formed . overall one also notices that the network diameter ( highlighted in all the plots of fig . [ aggregated - networks ] ) is considerably longer for sg than for ht09 aggregated networks , reflecting the different behavioral patterns in these settings . the small - world nature or lack thereof of the aggregated networks can be investigated statistically by introducing a proper null model . to this end , we construct a randomized network using the rewiring procedure described in ref . the procedure consists in taking random pairs of links @xmath15 and @xmath16 involving @xmath17 distinct nodes , and rewiring them as @xmath18 and @xmath19 . this procedure preserves the degree of each node and the degree distribution @xmath20 , while destroying the degree correlations between neighboring nodes , as well as any other correlations linked to node properties . the procedure is carried out so that initially distinct ccs do not get merged . since the rewiring procedure can not be implemented for the rare ccs with less than four nodes , these small ccs are removed from the aggregated networks before rewiring . figure [ rewired - networks ] displays a single realization of the null model for the networks in the top row of fig . [ aggregated - networks ] . we notice that the rewired version of the aggregated ht09 network is very similar to the original version , whereas the null model for the aggregated network of the sg data on july 14@xmath12 is more `` compact '' than the original network and exhibits a much shorter diameter . similar considerations hold for the other aggregated networks of the sg deployment . . left : ht09 deployment , june 30@xmath12 . right : sg deployment , july 14@xmath12 . the network diameters are highlighted as in fig . [ aggregated - networks ] . in the sg case , the randomized network is much more `` compact '' than the original one , with a much shorter diameter.,title="fig : " ] . left : ht09 deployment , june 30@xmath12 . right : sg deployment , july 14@xmath12 . the network diameters are highlighted as in fig . [ aggregated - networks ] . in the sg case , the randomized network is much more `` compact '' than the original one , with a much shorter diameter.,title="fig : " ] more quantitatively , we measure the mean number of nodes one can reach from a randomly chosen node by making @xmath21 steps on the network , a quantity hereafter called @xmath22 . for a network consisting of a single connected component , the definition of @xmath22 implies that @xmath23 where @xmath24 is the average node degree , @xmath25 is the total number of nodes in the network and @xmath26 the saturation value of @xmath27 on the network . the saturation value @xmath26 is reached when @xmath21 is equal to the length of the network diameter , and may vary for different realizations of the random networks . for a network consisting of several ccs one has to take into account the probability @xmath28 that the chosen node belongs to a given cc , where @xmath29 is the number of nodes in the @xmath30-th cc . as a consequence , eq . ( [ m - l - single - component ] ) generalizes to @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the average node degree on the @xmath30-th cc . this ensures that the quantity @xmath33 , regardless on the number of cc , assumes the same value when @xmath34 , and saturates to unity for both the aggregated and rewired network . figure [ m - l - plots ] displays @xmath33 for the aggregated networks on the top row of fig . [ aggregated - networks ] , as well as its value averaged on @xmath10 randomized networks ( the average value of @xmath22 converges rapidly already when calculated on a few tens of randomized networks ) . we notice the striking similarity between the results for the ht09 original and randomized networks , where about @xmath35 of the individuals lie , in both cases , within two degrees of separation . in the sg case , conversely , the same @xmath35 percentage is reached with six degrees of separation for the original network , but with only three degrees of separation on the corresponding randomized networks . the same calculation , performed on other aggregated sg networks , yields qualitatively similar results , always exposing a dramatic difference from the null model . steps on the network , @xmath22 , divided by its saturation limit @xmath26 , for daily aggregated networks ( circles ) and their randomized versions ( triangles ) . for the randomized case , data are averaged on @xmath10 realizations . left : network aggregated on june 30@xmath12 for the ht09 case . right : sg deployment , july 14@xmath12 . the solid lines are only guides for the eye.,title="fig : " ] steps on the network , @xmath22 , divided by its saturation limit @xmath26 , for daily aggregated networks ( circles ) and their randomized versions ( triangles ) . for the randomized case , data are averaged on @xmath10 realizations . left : network aggregated on june 30@xmath12 for the ht09 case . right : sg deployment , july 14@xmath12 . the solid lines are only guides for the eye.,title="fig : " ] averaged over all daily aggregated networks , for the ht09 ( left ) and the sg ( right ) cases . , title="fig : " ] averaged over all daily aggregated networks , for the ht09 ( left ) and the sg ( right ) cases . , title="fig : " ] one of the standard observables used to characterize a network topology is the degree distribution @xmath20 , i.e. , the probability that a randomly chosen node has @xmath36 neighbors . figure [ p - k ] reports the degree distributions of the daily aggregated networks , averaged over the whole duration of the ht09 deployment ( left ) and sg deployment ( right ) . for the sg case , we left out the few isolated nodes that contribute to the degree distribution for @xmath37 only . the @xmath20 distributions are short - tailed in all cases : @xmath20 decreases exponentially in the sg case , and even faster for ht09 . we notice that the ht09 degree distribution exhibits a peak at @xmath36 around @xmath38 , pointing to a characteristic number of contacts established during the conference . moreover , the average degree in the ht09 case , @xmath39 , close to @xmath6 , is more than twice as high as that for the sg networks , @xmath40 which is close to @xmath41 . this represents another clear indication of the behavioral difference of conference participants versus museum visitors ( the fact that the average degree is high for conference attendees can be regarded as a goal of the conference itself ) . finally , we observe that a large fraction of the recorded contacts are sustained for a short time : for instance , removing all the contacts with a cumulated duration below one minute yields @xmath40 about @xmath42 for ht09 and @xmath40 about @xmath43 for sg . the availability of time - resolved data allows one to gain much more insight into the salient features of the social interactions taking place during the deployments than what could be possible by the only knowledge of `` who has been in face - to - face proximity of whom '' . we first investigated the presence duration distribution in both settings . for the conference case , the distribution is rather trivial , as it essentially counts the number of conference participants spending one , two or three days at the conference . the visit duration distribution for the museum , instead , can be fitted to a lognormal distribution ( see fig . [ p - visits ] ) , with geometric mean around @xmath44 minutes . this shows that , unlike the case of the conference , here one can meaningfully introduce the concept of a characteristic visit duration that turns out to be well below the cutoff imposed by museum opening hours . the existence of a characteristic visit duration sheds light on the elongated aspect of the aggregated networks of visitor interactions ( see fig . [ aggregated - networks ] ) . indeed museum visitors are unlikely to interact directly with other visitors entering the venue more than one hour after them , thus preventing the aggregated network from exhibiting small - world properties . figure [ node - color - code ] reports the sg aggregated networks for two different days , where the network diameter is highlighted and each node is colored according to the arrival time of the corresponding visitor . one notices that , as expected from the aforementioned properties of the visit duration distribution , there is limited interaction among visitors entering the museum at different times . furthermore , the network diameter clearly defines a path connecting visitors that enter the venue at subsequent times , mirroring the longitudinal dimension of the network . these findings show that aggregated network topology and longitudinal / temporal properties are deeply interwoven . let us now focus on the temporal properties of social interactions . at the most detailed level , each contact between two individuals is characterized by its duration . the corresponding distributions are shown in fig . [ p - contact ] . as noted before , in both the ht09 and sg cases most of the recorded interactions amount to shortly - sustained contacts lasting less than one minute . however , both distributions show broad tails they decay only slightly faster than a power law . this behavior does not come as a surprise , as it has been observed in social sciences in a variety of context ranging from human mobility to email or mobile phone calls networks @xcite . more interestingly , the distributions are very close ( except in the noisy tail , due to the different number of contributing events ) , showing that the statistics of contact durations are robust across two very different settings . this robustness has been observed in ref . @xcite across different scientific conferences , but the museum setting corresponds to a situation in which a flux of individuals follows a predefined path , and this strong similarity between distributions was therefore not expected a priori . at a coarser level , aggregated networks are characterized by weights on the links , that quantify for how long two individuals have been in face - to - face proximity during the aggregation interval . figure [ p - w ] displays the distributions of these weights @xmath45 . these distributions are very broad @xcite : while most links correspond to very short contacts , some correspond to very long cumulated durations , and all time scales are represented , that is , no characteristic interaction timescale ( except for obvious cutoffs ) can be determined . we note that at this coarser level of analysis the distributions are again very similar . in the ht09 ( left ) and sg ( right ) aggregated networks ( data for all daily networks ) . the strength of a node quantifies the cumulated time of interaction of the corresponding individual with other individuals . , title="fig : " ] in the ht09 ( left ) and sg ( right ) aggregated networks ( data for all daily networks ) . the strength of a node quantifies the cumulated time of interaction of the corresponding individual with other individuals . , title="fig : " ] of nodes of degree @xmath36 . the figures show @xmath46 ( circles ) , for the ht09 ( left ) and sg ( right ) deployments ( the solid line is only a guide for the eye ) . the dashed lines stand for a linear fit and a power law fit to the data for the ht09 and sg deployments , respectively . distinct increasing and decreasing trends are respectively observed . the inset for the ht09 deployment shows a distribution of linear coefficients @xmath47 calculated for 4000 reshufflings of the network weights and the fitted value from the data collected at ht09 ( vertical line ) . the inset for the sg deployment shows @xmath48 on a doubly logarithmic scale ( circles ) together with the power law fit to the data ( dashed line ) . , title="fig : " ] of nodes of degree @xmath36 . the figures show @xmath46 ( circles ) , for the ht09 ( left ) and sg ( right ) deployments ( the solid line is only a guide for the eye ) . the dashed lines stand for a linear fit and a power law fit to the data for the ht09 and sg deployments , respectively . distinct increasing and decreasing trends are respectively observed . the inset for the ht09 deployment shows a distribution of linear coefficients @xmath47 calculated for 4000 reshufflings of the network weights and the fitted value from the data collected at ht09 ( vertical line ) . the inset for the sg deployment shows @xmath48 on a doubly logarithmic scale ( circles ) together with the power law fit to the data ( dashed line ) . , title="fig : " ] for each individual , the cumulated time of interaction with other individuals is moreover given by the strength @xmath49 of the corresponding node @xcite , i.e. , by the sum of the weights of all links inciding on it . the strength distributions @xmath50 are displayed in fig . [ p - s ] for the aggregated networks of the ht09 conference ( left ) and of the sg museum case ( right ) . unlike @xmath36 , the node strength @xmath49 spans several orders of magnitude , ranging from a few tens of seconds to well above one hour . the node strength @xmath49 can be correlated with the node degree @xmath36 by computing the average strength @xmath51 of nodes of degree @xmath36 @xcite . while a completely random assignment of weights yields a linear dependency with @xmath51 proportional to @xmath52 , where @xmath53 is the average link weight , super - linear or sub - linear behaviors have been observed in various contexts @xcite . a super - linear dependence such as the one observed in some conference settings @xcite hints at the presence of super - spreader nodes that play a prominent role in processes such as information diffusion @xcite . on the other hand , the sub - linear dependence observed for large - scale phone call networks @xcite corresponds to the fact that more active individuals spend on average less time in each call . figure [ s - over - k ] displays the ratio @xmath54 for the sg and ht09 daily aggregated networks . two different trends appear despite the large fluctuations : a slightly increasing trend in the conference setting , and a clearly decreasing one in the museum setting . in particular , the behavior of @xmath55 for the ht09 case ( left plot in figure [ s - over - k ] ) can be fitted linearly yielding a linear coefficient @xmath56 ( p - value @xmath57 ) . by reshuffling @xmath58 times the weights of the network links and performing the same linear fit for each reshuffling , we obtain a distribution of linear coefficients @xmath47 . such distribution , whose mean is zero , is shown in the inset of the left plot in figure [ s - over - k ] together with the value of @xmath47 from the ht09 daily aggregated networks ( vertical line ) . the observed value of @xmath47 at the ht09 is an outlier of the distribution ( @xmath59 percentile ) , thus showing that the observed behavior of @xmath55 can hardly arise by a random assignment of link weights . on the other hand , the observed behavior of @xmath55 at the sg can be fitted to a power law with a negative exponent i.e. it decreases linearly on a double logarithmic scale such as the one shown in the inset of the right plot in figure [ s - over - k ] . these results indicate that individuals who encountered the same number of distinct persons can have different spreading potentials , depending on the setting . it also gives a warning about characterizing spreading by only measuring the number of encounters , which can yield a rather misleading view . the issue of network vulnerability to successive node removal has attracted a lot of interest in recent years starting from the pioneering works of refs . @xcite , that have shown how complex networks typically retain their integrity when nodes are removed randomly , while they are very fragile with respect to targeted removal of the most connected nodes . while the concepts of node failures and targeted attacks are pertinent for infrastructure networks , successive removals of nodes or links is more generally a way to study network structures @xcite . for instance , detecting efficient strategies for dismantling the network sheds light on the network community structure , as it amounts to finding the links that act as bridges between different communities @xcite . moreover , in the context of information or disease spreading , the size of the largest connected component gives an upper bound on the number of nodes affected by the spreading . identifying ways to reduce this size , by removing particular links , in order to break and disconnect the network as much as possible , is analogous in terms of disease spreading to finding efficient intervention and containment strategies . in order to test different link removal strategies , we consider different definitions of weight for a link connecting nodes @xmath30 and @xmath60 in the aggregated contact network : + the simplest definition of link weight is given by the cumulated contact duration @xmath61 between @xmath30 and @xmath60 . in the following , we will refer to this weight as `` contact weight '' . + the topological overlap @xmath62 , introduced in ref . @xcite , is defined as @xmath63 \ , , \ ] ] where @xmath64 is the degree of node @xmath65 and @xmath66 measures the number of neighbors shared by nodes @xmath30 and @xmath60 . this measure is reminiscent of the edge clustering coefficient @xcite , and evaluates the ratio of the number of triangles leaning upon the @xmath67 edge with the maximum possible number of such triangles given that @xmath30 and @xmath60 have degrees @xmath68 and @xmath69 , respectively . edges between different communities are expected to have a low number of common neighbors , hence a low value of @xmath62 . + finally , the structural similarity of two nodes is defined as the cosine similarity @xmath70 \ , , \ ] ] where @xmath71 is the set of neighbors shared by nodes @xmath30 and @xmath60 , and the sums at the denominator are computed over all the neighbors of @xmath30 and @xmath60 . cosine similarity , which is one of the simplest similarity measures used in the field of information retrieval @xcite , takes into account not only the number of shared neighbors of @xmath30 and @xmath60 , but also the similarity of the corresponding edge strengths , i.e. the similarity of individuals in terms of the time they spent with their neighbors . once again , edges connecting different communities are expected to have a low value of @xmath72 . based on these three weight definitions , we consider four different strategies for link removal , namely : removing the links in increasing / decreasing order of contact weight , in increasing order of topological overlap , and in increasing order of cosine similarity . the former two strategies are the simplest one can devise , as they do not consider the neighborhoods topology . the latter two strategies were implemented in an incremental fashion , by recomputing the lists of links ranked in order of increasing overlap or cosine similarity whenever a link was removed , and then removing the links in the updated list order ) and ( [ eq : cos - simil ] ) , leads to sub - optimal results . the deviation from the updating strategy becomes apparent only when more than @xmath73 of links have been removed since @xmath62 and @xmath72 deal with local quantities only . as a consequence , each link removal amounts to a local perturbation of the network , contrary to what happens with non - local quantities such as the betweenness centrality @xcite . ] . an issue also arises from the fact that all the generalized weights mentioned above produce a certain amount of link degeneracy ( in particular when using the contact weight ) : for instance , many links may have the same ( small ) value @xmath61 , or exactly @xmath74 overlap or similarity . each link removal procedure carries therefore a certain ambiguity , and the results may depend on which links , among those with the same contact weight / overlap / similarity , are removed first . of the links on the sg museum daily aggregated network of july 14@xmath75 . clockwise from top : links removed in decreasing contact weight order , increasing contact weight order , increasing topological overlap order and increasing cosine similarity order . the largest cc is highlighted in each case.,title="fig : " ] of the links on the sg museum daily aggregated network of july 14@xmath75 . clockwise from top : links removed in decreasing contact weight order , increasing contact weight order , increasing topological overlap order and increasing cosine similarity order . the largest cc is highlighted in each case.,title="fig : " ] of the links on the sg museum daily aggregated network of july 14@xmath75 . clockwise from top : links removed in decreasing contact weight order , increasing contact weight order , increasing topological overlap order and increasing cosine similarity order . the largest cc is highlighted in each case.,title="fig : " ] of the links on the sg museum daily aggregated network of july 14@xmath75 . clockwise from top : links removed in decreasing contact weight order , increasing contact weight order , increasing topological overlap order and increasing cosine similarity order . the largest cc is highlighted in each case.,title="fig : " ] the impact of link removal on network fragmentation can be measured by monitoring the variations of the size of the largest cc , hereafter called @xmath76 , as a function of link removal . if the network is initially divided into two ccs , labeled @xmath77 and @xmath78 , of similar initial sizes @xmath79 , we call @xmath76 the size of the largest cc surviving in the network ( which does not need to be a subnetwork of @xmath77 ) . we used the apex `` @xmath74 '' to denote quantities expressed for the original network , before any link removal . in order to alleviate the problems arising from link degeneracy , we averaged @xmath76 on @xmath10 different link orderings ( i.e. we reshuffled the list of links of equal generalized weight before removing them ) . an example of a single realization of the removal strategies for the sg aggregated network of july 14@xmath12 is shown in fig . [ dismantled - networks ] . we observe that a removal of @xmath80 of the network links has a far deeper impact on the network when the removal is based on the topological overlap ( the size of the largest cc is @xmath81 ) or cosine similarity ( @xmath82 ) rather than on decreasing ( increasing ) contact weight ( @xmath83 @xmath84 ) . more quantitatively , fig . [ dismantled - networks - delta - n1 ] shows that removing links according to their topological overlap is the most efficient strategy . this is in agreement with previous results @xcite that have shown that topological criteria detect efficiently the links that act as bridges between communities . due to their high degeneracy , removing first the links with small contact weights approximates a random removal strategy that is far from optimal . despite this limitation , removing the links with small contact weights can outperform the removal of links with high contact weight since the latter are usually found within dense communities , while links between communities have typically small contact weights . of the largest cc as a function of the fraction of removed links , for several removal strategies , and for different daily aggregated networks in the ht09 and sg deployments . for all networks , removing links in increasing topological overlap order and increasing cosine similarity order have the most disruptive effects . the ht09 aggregated network is in all cases more resilient than the sg aggregated networks.,title="fig : " ] of the largest cc as a function of the fraction of removed links , for several removal strategies , and for different daily aggregated networks in the ht09 and sg deployments . for all networks , removing links in increasing topological overlap order and increasing cosine similarity order have the most disruptive effects . the ht09 aggregated network is in all cases more resilient than the sg aggregated networks.,title="fig : " ] of the largest cc as a function of the fraction of removed links , for several removal strategies , and for different daily aggregated networks in the ht09 and sg deployments . for all networks , removing links in increasing topological overlap order and increasing cosine similarity order have the most disruptive effects . the ht09 aggregated network is in all cases more resilient than the sg aggregated networks.,title="fig : " ] of the largest cc as a function of the fraction of removed links , for several removal strategies , and for different daily aggregated networks in the ht09 and sg deployments . for all networks , removing links in increasing topological overlap order and increasing cosine similarity order have the most disruptive effects . the ht09 aggregated network is in all cases more resilient than the sg aggregated networks.,title="fig : " ] the strategy based on link topological overlap proves slightly more effective than the strategy based on link similarity : the information on the link contact weights incorporated in the definition of @xmath72 ( eq . [ eq : cos - simil ] ) does not enhance the decrease of @xmath76 . this can be explained through the following argument : topological overlap link ranking usually leads to a higher degeneracy with respect to similarity - based link ranking . as a consequence , for a network with similar values of @xmath85 and @xmath86 , a strategy based on topological overlap is more likely to dismantle in parallel both @xmath77 and @xmath78 than a similarity - based strategy , as it has no bias towards a specific component . the opposite strategy of a complete dismantling of @xmath77 that leaves @xmath78 intact would result in @xmath87 even after the complete disintegration of @xmath77 . this effect is illustrated in fig . [ dismantled - networks - delta - n1 ] for the sg aggregated networks of may @xmath88 , which are indeed composed of two large ccs ( see fig . [ aggregated - networks ] ) . interestingly , and as expected from the previous comparisons , rather different results are obtained for the ht09 and sg aggregated networks . the conference network is more resilient to all strategies , and significant levels of disaggregation are reached only by removing large fractions ( @xmath89 ) of the links , sorted by their topological overlap . for the sg aggregated networks , on the other hand , targeting links with small topological overlap or cosine similarity is a quite effective strategy , which can be intuitively related to the modular structure visible in fig . [ aggregated - networks ] . aggregated networks often represent the most detailed information that is available on social interactions . in the present case , they would correspond to information obtained through ideal surveys in which respondents remember every single person they encountered and the overall duration of the contacts they had with that person . while such a static representation is already informative , it lacks information about the time ordering of events , and it is unable to encode causality . the data from our measurements do not suffer from this limitation , as they comprise temporal information about every single contact . therefore , these data can be used to investigate the unfolding of dynamical processes . they also allow to study the role of causality in diffusion processes , such as the spreading of an infectious agent or of a piece of information on the encounter networks of individuals . in the following we will mainly use an epidemiological terminology , but we may equally imagine that the rfid devices are able to exchange some information whenever a contact is established . individuals will be divided into two categories , susceptible individuals ( s ) or infected ones ( i ) : susceptible individuals have not caught the `` disease '' ( or have not received the information ) , while infected ones carry the disease ( or have received the information ) and can propagate it to other individuals . in order to focus on the structure of the dynamical network itself , we consider in the following a deterministic snowball si model @xcite : every contact between a susceptible individual and an infected one , no matter how short , results in a transmission event in which the susceptible becomes infected , according to @xmath90 . in this model , individuals , once infected , do not recover . such a deterministic model allows to isolate the role played in the spreading process by the structure of the dynamical network ( e.g. its causality ) . its role would otherwise be entangled with the stochasticity of the transmission process and the corresponding interplay of timescales . of course , any realistic epidemiological model should include a stochastic description of the infection process , since the transmission from an infected individual to a susceptible one is a random event that depends on their cumulative interaction time . the resulting dynamics would depend on the interplay between contact and propagation times . we leave the study of this interesting type of interplay to future investigations . in our numerical experiments , for each day we select a single `` seed '' , i.e. , an individual who first introduces the infection into the network . all the other individuals are susceptible and the infection spreads deterministically as described above . by varying the choice of the seed over individuals , we obtain the distribution of the number of infected individuals at the end of each day . the transmission events can be used to define the network along which the infection spreads ( i.e. , the network whose edges are given by @xmath91 contacts ) , hereafter called the _ transmission network_. due to causality , the infection can only reach individuals present at the venue after the entry of the seed . as a consequence , in the following we will use the term _ partially aggregated network _ to indicate the network aggregated from the time the seed enters the museum / conference to the end of the day . we note that the partially aggregated network defined in this way can be radically different from ( much smaller than ) the network aggregated along the whole day . at the sg museum , for two different choices of the seed ( blue node at the bottom ) . transparent nodes and light gray edges represent individuals not infected and contacts not spreading the infection , respectively . red nodes and dark gray links represent infected individuals and contacts spreading the infection , respectively . the diameter of the transmission network and of the partially aggregated networks are shown respectively with blue and orange links . the black node represents the last infected individual . , title="fig : " ] at the sg museum , for two different choices of the seed ( blue node at the bottom ) . transparent nodes and light gray edges represent individuals not infected and contacts not spreading the infection , respectively . red nodes and dark gray links represent infected individuals and contacts spreading the infection , respectively . the diameter of the transmission network and of the partially aggregated networks are shown respectively with blue and orange links . the black node represents the last infected individual . , title="fig : " ] figure [ infection - network ] shows two partially aggregated networks for july 14@xmath12 at the sg museum , for two different choices of the seed ( blue node ) , and the corresponding transmission networks . the transmission network is of course a subnetwork of the partially aggregated network : not all individuals entering the premises after the seed can be reached from the seed by a _ causal _ path , and not all links are used for transmission events . in order to emphasize the branching nature of infection spreading , we represent the transmission network with successively infected nodes arranged from the bottom to the top of the figure . we notice that the diameter of both the transmission and the partially aggregated network may not include the seed and/or the last infected individual . from the seed to all the infected individuals calculated over the transmission network ( circles ) and the partially aggregated networks ( triangles ) . the distributions are computed , for each day , by varying the choice of the seed over all individuals . , title="fig : " ] from the seed to all the infected individuals calculated over the transmission network ( circles ) and the partially aggregated networks ( triangles ) . the distributions are computed , for each day , by varying the choice of the seed over all individuals . , title="fig : " ] from the seed to all the infected individuals calculated over the transmission network ( circles ) and the partially aggregated networks ( triangles ) . the distributions are computed , for each day , by varying the choice of the seed over all individuals . , title="fig : " ] from the seed to all the infected individuals calculated over the transmission network ( circles ) and the partially aggregated networks ( triangles ) . the distributions are computed , for each day , by varying the choice of the seed over all individuals . , title="fig : " ] the presence of a few triangles in the transmission network is due to the finite time resolution of the measurements . let us consider , for instance , the case of an infected visitor @xmath92 who infects @xmath93 , followed by a simultaneous contact of @xmath92 and @xmath93 with the susceptible @xmath94 . in this case it is impossible to attribute the infection of @xmath94 to either @xmath92 or @xmath93 , and both the @xmath95 and the @xmath96 links are highlighted in the transmission network as admissible transmission events . as a consequence , we slightly overestimate the number of links in the transmission network of fig . [ infection - network ] . in the case of fig . [ infection - network ] , the number of links is between @xmath3 and @xmath97 larger than for a tree with the same number of nodes . at finer time resolutions , some of the diffusion paths of fig . [ infection - network ] would actually be forbidden by causality . a general feature exemplified by fig . [ infection - network ] is that the diameter of the transmission network ( blue path ) is longer than the diameter of the partially aggregated network ( orange path ) , a first signature of the fact that the fastest paths between two individuals , which are the ones followed by the spreading process , do not coincide with the shortest path over the partially aggregated network @xcite . ) along the transmission network , versus the total duration of the epidemics ( time interval from the entry of the seed to the last infection event).,title="fig : " ] ) along the transmission network , versus the total duration of the epidemics ( time interval from the entry of the seed to the last infection event).,title="fig : " ] ) along the transmission network , versus the total duration of the epidemics ( time interval from the entry of the seed to the last infection event).,title="fig : " ] ) along the transmission network , versus the total duration of the epidemics ( time interval from the entry of the seed to the last infection event).,title="fig : " ] the difference between the fastest and the shortest paths for a spreading process can be quantitatively investigated . figure [ path - length - distr ] reports the distribution of the network distances @xmath98 between the seed and every other infected individual along both the transmission networks and the aggregated networks . when calculated on the partially aggregated network , @xmath98 measures the length of the _ shortest _ seed - to - infected - individual path , whereas it yields the length of the _ fastest _ seed - to - infected - individual path when calculated on the transmission network . we observe that the length distribution of fastest paths , i.e. , the @xmath99 distribution for the transmission network , always turns out to be broader and shifted toward higher values of @xmath98 than the corresponding shortest path distribution , i.e. , @xmath99 for the partially aggregated network . the difference is particularly noticeable in the case of may @xmath100 and july @xmath101 for the sg deployment , and june @xmath102 for the ht09 conference , where the longest paths on the transmission network are about twice as long as the longest paths along the partially aggregated network . these results clearly underline that in order to understand realistic dynamical processes on contact networks , information about the time ordering of the contact events turns out to be essential : the information carried by the aggregated network may lead to erroneous conclusions on the spreading paths . it is also possible to study the length of the path connecting the first ( seed ) to the last infected individual along the transmission network . we measure the fastest seed - to - last - infected - individual path ( a quantity hereafter called `` transmission @xmath98 '' ) as a function of the duration of the spreading process , defined as the time between the entry of the seed and the last transmission event . as shown by fig . [ time - length - distr ] , a clear correlation is observed between the transmission @xmath98 and the duration of the spreading process for the sg case ( pearson coefficients @xmath103 for may @xmath100 and may @xmath104 , and @xmath105 for july @xmath101 ) . no significant correlation is instead observed for the ht09 conference . this highlights the importance of the longitudinal dimension in the sg data , and gives a first indication of the strong differences in the spreading patterns , that we further explore in the following . and @xmath106 quantile of the distribution of infected individuals at the end of each day , and the red lines correspond to the median ( @xmath107 quantile ) . the @xmath108 and @xmath109 are also shown ( black horizontal lines ) . , title="fig : " ] and @xmath106 quantile of the distribution of infected individuals at the end of each day , and the red lines correspond to the median ( @xmath107 quantile ) . the @xmath108 and @xmath109 are also shown ( black horizontal lines ) . , title="fig : " ] and @xmath106 quantile of the distribution of infected individuals at the end of each day , and the red lines correspond to the median ( @xmath107 quantile ) . the @xmath108 and @xmath109 are also shown ( black horizontal lines ) . , title="fig : " ] and @xmath106 quantile of the distribution of infected individuals at the end of each day , and the red lines correspond to the median ( @xmath107 quantile ) . the @xmath108 and @xmath109 are also shown ( black horizontal lines ) . , title="fig : " ] let us now consider some other quantitative properties of the spreading process , in particular the number of individuals reached by the infection / information at the end of one day . in the sg case fig . [ boxplot - number - infected ] shows the distributions for each day , as boxplots , displaying the median together with the @xmath108 , @xmath110 , @xmath106 and @xmath109 percentiles . days are arranged horizontally from left to right , in increasing number of visitors . a high degree of heterogeneity is visible . the blue line corresponds to the number of daily visitors , that is the maximum number of individuals who can potentially be infected . we observe that the number of infected individuals is usually well below this limit . the number of reached individuals also depends on the number of cc in the aggregated network , as the spreading process can not propagate from one cc to another . in fact , the limit for which all visitors are infected can be reached only if the aggregated network is globally connected , that occurs only when the global number of visitors is large enough . these results hint at the high intrinsic variability of the final outcome of an epidemic - like process in a situation where individuals stream through a building . a totally different picture emerges for the ht09 conference , where the infection is almost always able to reach all the participants . as mentioned previously , the spreading process can not reach individuals who have left the venue before the seed enters , or the individuals who belong to a cc different from that of the seed . therefore , we consider the ratio of the final number of infected individuals , @xmath111 to the number @xmath112 of individuals who can be potentially reached through causal transmission paths starting at the seed . the distributions of this ratio is reported in fig . [ ratio - ninf - nsus ] . we observe that in the case of ht09 ( left ) almost all the potentially infected individuals will be infected by the end of the day , whereas the distribution of @xmath113 is broader in the sg case ( right ) . we notice that a static network description would inevitably lead to all individuals in the seed s cc catching the infection , a fact that can be a severe ( and misleading ) approximation of reality . for each day the chosen seed generates a deterministic spreading process for which we can compute the cumulative number of infected individuals as a function of time , a quantity hereafter referred to as an incidence curve . figure [ epidemics - within - day ] shows the results for a selected day of the ht09 conference and for three different days of the sg data . for the ht09 ( left ) and the sg ( right ) data , averaged over all potential seeds . @xmath111 is the final number of infected individuals at the end of one day , while @xmath112 is the number of individuals that could potentially be reached by a causal transmission path starting at the seed . @xmath112 is given by the number of individuals visiting the premises in the same day , from the time the seed enters the premises , and belonging to the same cc as the seed . , title="fig : " ] for the ht09 ( left ) and the sg ( right ) data , averaged over all potential seeds . @xmath111 is the final number of infected individuals at the end of one day , while @xmath112 is the number of individuals that could potentially be reached by a causal transmission path starting at the seed . @xmath112 is given by the number of individuals visiting the premises in the same day , from the time the seed enters the premises , and belonging to the same cc as the seed . , title="fig : " ] ( aggregated network consisting of a single cc with @xmath114 individuals ) ; sg network for july 14@xmath12 ( one cc , @xmath115 individuals ) , may 19@xmath12 ( two ccs , @xmath116 individuals ) and may 20@xmath12 ( two ccs , @xmath117 individuals ) . each curve corresponds to a different seed , and is color - coded according to the starting time of the spreading . , title="fig : " ] ( aggregated network consisting of a single cc with @xmath114 individuals ) ; sg network for july 14@xmath12 ( one cc , @xmath115 individuals ) , may 19@xmath12 ( two ccs , @xmath116 individuals ) and may 20@xmath12 ( two ccs , @xmath117 individuals ) . each curve corresponds to a different seed , and is color - coded according to the starting time of the spreading . , title="fig : " ] ( aggregated network consisting of a single cc with @xmath114 individuals ) ; sg network for july 14@xmath12 ( one cc , @xmath115 individuals ) , may 19@xmath12 ( two ccs , @xmath116 individuals ) and may 20@xmath12 ( two ccs , @xmath117 individuals ) . each curve corresponds to a different seed , and is color - coded according to the starting time of the spreading . , title="fig : " ] ( aggregated network consisting of a single cc with @xmath114 individuals ) ; sg network for july 14@xmath12 ( one cc , @xmath115 individuals ) , may 19@xmath12 ( two ccs , @xmath116 individuals ) and may 20@xmath12 ( two ccs , @xmath117 individuals ) . each curve corresponds to a different seed , and is color - coded according to the starting time of the spreading . , title="fig : " ] in the case of the ht09 conference , the earliest possible seeds are the conference organizers , but little happens until conference participants gather for the coffee break and/or meet up at the end of the first talk , between @xmath118:@xmath119 and @xmath120:@xmath119 . a strong increase in the number of infected individuals is then observed , and a second strong increase occurs during the lunch break . due to the concentration in time of transmission events , spreading processes reach very similar ( and high ) incidence levels after a few hours , regardless of the initial seed or its arriving time . even processes started after @xmath121:@xmath119 can reach about @xmath122 of the conference participants . thus , the crucial point for the spreading process does not consist in knowing where and when the epidemic trajectory has started , but whether the seed or any other subsequently infected individual attend the coffee break or not . a different picture is obtained in the sg case : first , in order to reach almost all participants the epidemics must spread on a globally connected network and start early ( black curves for july @xmath123 data ) . even in such a favorable setting for spreading , the incidence curves do not present sharp gradients , and later epidemics are unable to infect a large fraction of daily visitors . the incidence curves for may @xmath124 and @xmath125 of fig . [ epidemics - within - day ] show that different scenarios can also occur : due to the fragmented nature of the network , the final fraction of infected individuals can fluctuate greatly , and sharp increases of the incidence can be observed when dense groups such as those visible in fig . [ aggregated - networks ] are reached . in this paper we have shown that the analysis of time - resolved network data can unveil interesting properties of behavioral networks of face - to - face interaction between individuals . we considered data collected in two very different settings , representative of two types of social gatherings : the ht09 conference is a `` closed '' systems in which a group of individuals gathers and interacts in a repeated fashion , while the sg museum deployment is an `` open '' environment with a flux of individuals streaming through the premises . we took advantage of the accurate time - resolved nature of our data sources to build dynamically evolving behavioral networks . we analyzed aggregated networks , constructed by aggregating the face - to - face interactions during time intervals of one day , and provided a comparison of their properties in both settings . we assessed the role of network dynamics on the outcome of dynamical processes such as spreading processes of informations or of an infectious agent . our analysis shows that the behavioral networks of individuals in conferences and in a museum setting exhibit both similarities and important differences . the topologies of the aggregated networks are widely different : the conference networks are rather dense small - worlds , while the sg networks have a larger diameter and are possibly made of several connected components they do not form small - worlds , and their `` elongated '' shape can be put in relation with the fact that individuals enter the premises at different times and remain there only for a limited amount of time . the networks differences are also unveiled by a percolation analysis , which reveals how the sg aggregated networks can easily be dismantled by removing links that act as `` bridges '' between groups of individuals ; on the contrary , aggregated networks at a conference are more `` robust '' , even with respect to targeted link removal . interestingly , some important similarities are also observed : the degree distributions of aggregated networks , for example , are short - tailed in both cases . moreover , despite the higher social activity at a conference , both the distribution of the contact event durations and the distribution of the total time spent in face - to - face interactions by two individuals are very similar . the study of simple spreading processes unfolding on the dynamical networks of interaction between individuals allowed us to delve deeper into the time - resolved nature of our data . comparison of the spreading dynamics on the time - dependent networks with the corresponding dynamics on the aggregated networks shows that the latter easily yields erroneous conclusions . in particular , our results highlight the strong impact of causality in the structure of transmission chains , that can differ significantly from those obtained on a static network . the temporal properties of the contacts are crucial in determining the spreading patterns and their properties . studies about the role of the initial seed and its properties on the spreading patterns , or the determination of the most crucial nodes for propagation , can be misleading if only the static aggregated network is considered . in more realistic dynamics , the fastest path is typically not the shortest path of the aggregated network , and the role of causality is clearly visible in the analysis of the seed - to - last - infected paths . spreading phenomena unfold in very different ways in the two settings we investigated : at a conference , people interact repeatedly and with bursts of activity , so that transmission events also occur in a bursty fashion , and most individuals are reached at the end of the day ; in a streaming situation , instead , the fraction of reached individuals can be very small due to either the lack of global connectivity or the late start of the spreading process . detailed information on the temporal ordering of contacts is therefore crucial . we also note that in more realistic settings with non - deterministic spreading , information about the duration of contacts , and not only their temporal ordering , would also turn out to be very relevant and lead to an interesting interplay between the contact timescale and the propagation timescale @xcite . future work will also address the issue of sampling effects : the fact that not all the conference attendees participated to the data collection may lead to an underestimation of spreading , since spreading paths between sampled attendees involving unobserved persons may have existed , but are not taken into account . we close by stressing that as the data sources on person - to - person interactions become richer and ever more pervasive , the task of analyzing networks of interactions is unavoidably shifting away from statics towards dynamics , and a pressing need is building up for theoretical frameworks that can appropriately deal with streamed graph data and large scales . at the same time , we have shown that access to these data sources challenges a number of assumptions and poses new questions on how well - known dynamical processes unfold on dynamic graphs . data collections of the scale reported in this manuscript are only possible with the collaboration and support of many dedicated individuals . we gratefully thank the science gallery in dublin for inspiring ideas and for hosting our deployment . special thanks go to michael john gorman , don pohlman , lynn scarff , derek williams , and all the staff members and facilitators who helped to communicate the experiment and engage the public . we thank the organizers of the acm hypertext 2009 conference and acknowledge the help of ezio borzani , vittoria colizza , daniela paolotti , corrado gioannini and the staff members of the isi foundation , as well as the help of several hypertext 2009 volunteers . we also thank harith alani , martin szomszor and gianluca correndo of the live social semantics team . we warmly thank bitmanufaktur and the openbeacon project , and acknowledge technical support from milosch meriac and brita meriac . we acknowledge stimulating discussions with alessandro vespignani and vittoria colizza . this study was partially supported by the fet - open project dynanets ( grant no . 233847 ) funded by the european commission . finally , we are grateful for the valuable feedback , the patience and the support of the tens of thousands of volunteers who participated in the deployments . d. watts , connections a twenty - first century science , nature 445 ( 2007 ) 489 . g. chowell , j. m. hyman , s. eubank , c. castillo - chavez , scaling laws for the movement of people between locations in a large city , phys . e 68 ( 2003 ) 066102 . d. balcan , v. colizza , b. gonalves , h. hu , j.j . ramasco , a. vespignani , multiscale mobility networks and the spatial spreading of infectious diseases , proc . natl . acad . usa 106 ( 2009 ) 21484 - 21489 . s. golder , d. wilkinson , b. huberman , rhythms of social interaction : messaging within a massive online network , _ communities and technologies 2007 : proceedings of the third communities and technologies conference _ michigan state university , 2007 . p. hui , a. chaintreau , j. scott , r. gass , j. crowcroft , c. diot , pocket switched networks and human mobility in conference environments , proceedings of the 2005 acm sigcomm workshop on delay - tolerant networking , philadelphia , pennsylvania , usa ( 2005 ) 244 - 251 . n. eagle , a. pentland , reality mining : sensing complex social systems , personal and ubiquitous computing 10 ( 2006 ) 255 - 268 . e. oneill , v. kostakos , t. kindberg , a. fatah gen . schieck , a. penn , d. stanton fraser , t. jones , instrumenting the city : developing methods for observing and understanding the digital cityscape , lecture notes in computer science 4206 ( 2006 ) 315 - 332 . a. pentland , honest signals : how they shape our world , mit press , cambridge ma , 2008 . h. alani , m. szomsor , c. cattuto , w. van den broeck , g. correndo , a. barrat , live social semantics , 8@xmath12 international semantic web conference iswc2009 , lecture notes in computer science 5823 ( 2009 ) 698 - 714 , http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04930-9_44 . w. van den broeck , c. cattuto , a. barrat , m. szomsor , g. correndo , h. alani , the live social semantics application : a platform for integrating face - to - face presence with on - line social networking , first international workshop on communication , collaboration and social networking in pervasive computing environments ( percol 2010 ) , proceedings of the 8th annual ieee international conference on pervasive computing and communications , mannheim , germany ( 2010 ) 226 - 231 . onnela , j. saramki , j. hyvonen , g. szab , m. argollo de menezes , k. kaski , a .- l- barabsi , j. kertsz , analysis of a large - scale weighted network of one - to - one human communication , new j. phys 9 ( 2007 ) 179 . onnela , j. saramki , j. hyvnen , g. szab , d. lazer , k. kaski , j. kertsz , a .- barabsi , structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , proc . natl . acad . usa 104 ( 2007 ) 7332 - 7336 . g. kossinets , j. kleinberg , d. watts . the structure of information pathways in a social communication network , proceedings of the 14@xmath126 acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining ( 2008 ) . j. stehl , n. voirin , a. barrat , c. cattuto , v. colizza , l. isella , c. rgis , j .- f . pinton , n. khanafer , w. van den broeck , p. vanhems , infectious disease spread on a data - driven dynamic contact network , submitted . g. csardi and t. nepusz , the igraph software package for complex network research , interjournal complex systems ( 2006 ) 1695 . Abstract:
[ "the availability of new data sources on human mobility is opening new avenues for investigating the interplay of social networks , human mobility and dynamical processes such as epidemic spreading . here we analyze data on the time - resolved face - to - face proximity of individuals in large - scale real - world scenarios . we compare two settings with very different properties , a scientific conference and a long - running museum exhibition . we track the behavioral networks of face - to - face proximity , and characterize them from both a static and a dynamic point of view , exposing differences and similarities . we use our data to investigate the dynamics of a susceptible - infected model for epidemic spreading that unfolds on the dynamical networks of human proximity . the spreading patterns are markedly different for the conference and the museum case , and they are strongly impacted by the causal structure of the network data . a deeper study of the spreading paths shows that the mere knowledge of static aggregated networks would lead to erroneous conclusions about the transmission paths on the dynamical networks ." ]
11,882
11,882
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: recently , localization systems have found widespread application , since they allow to develop a number of new services in both outdoor and indoor environments @xcite . conventional localization systems acquire positional information from a set of observations ; these are usually extracted from noisy wireless signals propagating in harsh environments . unavoidably , this limits the accuracy that can be achieved by such systems . localization accuracy can certainly benefit from the availability of any form of _ a priori _ knowledge . in the technical literature , the sources of prior knowledge commonly exploited are represented by the positions of some specific nodes ( called _ anchors _ ) or by some characteristic of the communication channel ; for instance in @xcite the impact of different factors ( like non - line - of - sight , nlos , propagation and network synchronization ) on localization accuracy have been thoroughly analysed employing cramer - rao bounds ( crbs ) and , when a priori knowledge is available , bayesian cramer - rao bounds ( bcrbs ) . in @xcite multipath propagation in ultra wide band ( uwb ) systems and its effects on time - of - arrival ( toa ) estimation have been investigated by means of crbs or bcrbs . in @xcite crbs and bcrbs for the analysis of cooperative localization techniques have been derived . in recent times , however , some attention has been paid to the possibility of improving accuracy by endowing localization systems with _ map - awareness _ , i.e. , with the knowledge of the _ map _ of the environment in which they operate . specific examples of map - aware algorithms have been developed in @xcite , which propose the adoption of non - linear filtering techniques ( namely , particle filtering and extended kalman filtering ) to embed map - based a priori information in navigation systems . this work evidences that this kind of information plays an important role in improving localization and navigation accuracy ; however , the impact of map - awareness on the performance limits of localization systems is still an open problem . in fact , as far as we know , the technical literature dealing with the fundamental limits of localization accuracy @xcite has not considered this issue yet . in this paper , novel accuracy bounds for map - aware localization systems are developed and their applications to specific environments are analysed . specifically , the bcrb , the extended zik - zakai bound ( ezzb ) and the weiss - weinstein bound ( wwb ) for the above mentioned systems are derived . these bounds , which provide several novel insights into map - aware localization , have the following features : 1 . they are characterized by different tightness / analytical complexity ; 2 . they can be evaluated for any map geometry and , in the cases of the bcrb and the ezzb , admit a closed form for rectangular maps ; 3 . they allow to a ) identify map features ( e.g. , shape , area , etc . ) influencing localization accuracy and b ) quantify such an influence . then , such bounds are evaluated and compared for simple representative environments . our results allow to assess the importance of map - awareness in localization systems in the presence of noisy observations . in particular , they evidence that : 1 . maps should be expected to play a significant role at low signal - to - noise ratios ( snrs ) and in the presence of obstructions ; 2 . in some cases simplified map models can be adopted for localization purposes , since map details have a negligible impact on estimation accuracy . the manuscript is organized as follows . in section [ sec : scenario ] our reference scenario is illustrated and the map model is defined . performance bounds for map - aware localization are derived and evaluated in specific scenarios in sections [ sec : perf_bounds ] and [ sec : num_res ] , respectively . finally , some conclusions are offered in section [ sec : conc ] . _ notations _ : matrices are denoted by upper - case bold letters , vectors by lower - case bold letters and scalar quantities by italic letters . the notation @xmath0 denotes expectation with respect to the random vector @xmath1 ; @xmath2 denotes the trace of a square matrix ; @xmath3 denotes a square matrix with the arguments on its main diagonal and zeros elsewhere ; @xmath4_{i , l}$ ] is the element on the @xmath5-th row and @xmath6-th column of its argument . @xmath7 denotes the @xmath8 identity matrix ; @xmath9 means that the matrix @xmath10 is positive semi - definite . the probability density function ( pdf ) of the random vector @xmath11 evaluated at the point @xmath1 is denoted as @xmath12 , whereas @xmath13 denotes the pdf of a gaussian random vector having mean @xmath14 and covariance matrix @xmath15 , evaluated at the point @xmath1 . @xmath16 denotes the so called indicator function for the set @xmath17 ( it is equal to 1 when @xmath18 and zero otherwise ) . in the following we focus on the problem of localizing a single device , called _ agent _ , in a 2-d environment , i.e. , of estimating its position @xmath19^{t}$ ] , in the presence of the following information : a ) a map representing the a priori knowledge about the environment in which the localization system operates ; b ) an observation vector @xmath20 related to the true position @xmath21 of the agent . in a bayesian framework the map of a given environment can be modelled for localization purposes as a pdf @xmath22 of the random variable @xmath21 , representing the agent position . such a pdf is characterized by a 2-d support @xmath23 having a finite size and consisting of the set of points in the environment not occupied by obstructions ( e.g. , walls , buildings , etc ) . in the absence of other prior knowledge , a natural choice for @xmath22 is a simple uniform model , i.e. , @xmath24 where @xmath25 denotes the area of @xmath23 . this model is referred to as _ uniform map _ in the following and is preferable to other , more detailed , prior models since it can be adopted when only basic knowledge of the environment is available ( e.g. , the floor plan of a building in indoor environments or satellite photos in outdoor environments ) . an alternative statistical model for maps , better suited to mathematical analysis in the bcrb case , is a `` smoothed '' version of ( [ eq : uniform_map ] ) ; this is obtained modifying the uniform pdf in a narrow area around the edges of @xmath23 in order to introduce a smooth transition to zero along the boundaries of its support . note that the adoption of a smoothed uniform model leads to analytical results similar to those found with the uniform model if the transition region is small with respect to the size of @xmath23 . as it will become clearer in the following , for a generic map , a detailed description of the structure of its support @xmath23 should be provided to ease the formulation of the accuracy bounds referring to the map itself . to begin , let us define , for each @xmath26 , the sets @xmath27 and @xmath28 representing the intersection between @xmath23 and an horizontal ( _ h _ ) and vertical ( _ v _ ) line identified by the abscissa @xmath29 and ordinate @xmath30 , respectively . then , let : * @xmath31 and @xmath32 denote the number of connected components of @xmath33 and @xmath34 , respectively ; * @xmath35 and @xmath36 denote the set of the _ odd _ values @xmath37 and @xmath38 @xmath39 , respectively ; * @xmath40 and @xmath41 , with @xmath42 and @xmath43 , denote the length of the connected components of @xmath33 and @xmath34 respectively ; * @xmath44 and @xmath45 denote the set of the _ even _ values @xmath46 and @xmath47 @xmath48 , respectively . * @xmath49 and @xmath50 , with @xmath51 and @xmath52 , denote the length of the connected components of @xmath53 and @xmath54 respectively ( note that @xmath53 and @xmath54 represent the complementary sets of @xmath33 and @xmath34 with respect to @xmath55 ) ; in other words , they denote the horizontal and vertical size of map obstructions , respectively ; * @xmath56 and @xmath57 denote the projection of @xmath23 on the @xmath29 and @xmath30 axis , respectively ; the graphical meaning of these parameters for a specific uniform map is exemplified by fig . [ fig : non_convex_generic_shape ] . in the following , we assume that the localization system is able to acquire a set of noisy observations , collected in a vector @xmath20 and related to the agent position @xmath21 according to a specific statistical model . note that , on the one hand , the results illustrated in sec . [ sub : bcrb ] hold for a general statistical model relating @xmath20 to @xmath21 ; on the other hand , in sec . [ sub : zzb ] and [ sub : wwb ] , it is assumed that @xmath58 for mathematical convenience , where @xmath59 and @xmath60 ( i.e. , @xmath20 is affected by uncorrelated noise ) . it is important to point out that : 1 . the model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) is purposely abstract and does not explicitly refer to a specific localization technique ( e.g. , toa or received signal strength ( rss ) ) or to particular propagation conditions . generally speaking , it is suitable to describe the position estimate @xmath20 generated by a map - unaware and unbiased localization algorithm ; in addition , it leads to useful bounds which unveil the impact of _ map _ modelling ( instead of that of _ observation _ modelling ) on estimation performance ; readers interested in an in - depth analysis on the impact of observation modelling can refer to @xcite . 2 . in principle , the bounds derived in this manuscript can be extended to the case of correlated noise , accounting for the presence of an off - diagonal term @xmath61 in @xmath15 . however , the presence of noise correlation is neglected in the following derivations since : a ) the magnitude of @xmath62 in a real world system depends on several parameters ( the type of measurements processed by the system , the multi - lateration or angulation technique employed , the properties of the propagation channel , etc ) and can not be easily assessed ; b ) our research work evidenced that the presence of noise correlation does not provide significant additional insights on the impact of map - awareness on performance bounds . in this section various bounds about the accuracy of map - aware position estimation are derived and their implications are analysed . given an estimator @xmath63 of @xmath21 based on the observation vector @xmath20 , the bcrb establishes that the bayesian mean square error ( bmse ) matrix @xmath64 satisfies @xmath65 @xcite , where @xmath66 is the bayesian fisher information matrix ( bfim ) associated to the statistical models employed by @xmath63 . this result entails that , for 2-d localization : @xmath67 where @xmath68_{1,1}$ ] , @xmath69_{2,2}$ ] , @xmath70_{1,1}$ ] and @xmath71_{2,2}$ ] . it is not difficult to show that the bfim @xmath66 can be put in the form ( e.g. , see ( * ? ? ? ( 75 ) ) ) @xmath72 where @xmath73^{t}\right\ } \label{eq : bfim_cond}\ ] ] and @xmath74^{t}\right\ } \label{eq : bfim_apriori}\ ] ] represent the contributions originating from the observation vector ( i.e. , the so called _ conditional _ information ) and that due to _ a priori _ information , respectively . the last decomposition allows us to analyse the two above mentioned sources of information in a separate fashion . therefore , in the following , we mainly focus on the evaluation of the matrix @xmath75 ( [ eq : bfim_apriori ] ) , since this term unveils the contribution of map information in the estimation of agent position . as already mentioned in sec . [ sub : scenario_map ] a smoothed uniform map model is adopted in the derivation of @xmath75 ( analytical details are provided in appendix [ apd : proofs_bfim ] ) so that its pdf @xmath22 , unlike its ( discontinuous ) uniform counterpart ( [ eq : uniform_map ] ) , satisfies the regularity condition@xcite @xmath76 required for the evaluation of the bayesian fisher information . moreover it is assumed that : 1 . the smoothing of @xmath22 is described by a smoothing function @xmath77 , which is required to be a continuous and differentiable pdf for which the a priori fisher information ( fi ) @xmath78 can be evaluated ; 2 . the smoothing of @xmath22 along the @xmath29 axis is independent from that along the @xmath30 axis . in appendix [ apd : proofs_bfim ] it is proved that , given the assumptions illustrated above , @xmath75 ( [ eq : bfim_apriori ] ) can be approximated as @xmath79 note that such an expression is independent from the observation model and depends from the smoothing function through its fi @xmath80 only the value to be assigned to @xmath80 is derived for the case of rectangular maps . ] . given @xmath81 , the computation of the bcrb requires the knowledge of @xmath82 ( [ eq : bfim_cond ] ) ( see ( [ eq : j_somma ] ) ) ; for its evaluation , instead of considering a specific observation model , we just assume that the cross - information about @xmath29 and @xmath30 is negligible , so that such a matrix can be put in the form if the specific observation model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) is adopted ; this result will be exploited later for comparison with other bounds derived for the model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) . ] @xmath83 then , the bcrb associated with the pdf @xmath22 can be put in the form ( see ( [ eq : bfim_map_generic_mult_intervals ] ) , ( [ eq : jzp ] ) and ( [ eq : j_somma ] ) ) @xmath84 it can be shown that the last two expressions are exact , and can be put in a closed form ( not involving any integral ) , if @xmath23 is the union of a set of disjoint rectangles ( all having parallel sides ) . from ( [ eq : bfim_map_generic_mult_intervals ] ) and ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) it can be inferred that : 1 . map - aware estimators should be expected to be always more accurate than their map - unaware counterparts ; in fact @xmath81 ( [ eq : bfim_map_generic_mult_intervals ] ) is positive definite , so that the trace of the matrix @xmath85 ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) ( which bounds the accuracy of map - aware estimators ) is smaller than the trace of @xmath86 ( see ( [ eq : jzp ] ) ) which represents the cramer - rao bound ( crb ) in the considered scenario ( and bounds the accuracy of map - unaware estimators ) . note that this is a well - known result ( the contribution of a priori information is positive and lowers the bcrb ) , but may be concealed by the complex analytical form of ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) . 2 . the bcrb ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) exhibits a complicated dependence on the map properties and , in particular , a complex non linear dependence on the map area @xmath25 ; in fact , this parameter can be related to the functions @xmath87 and @xmath88 appearing in the right - hand side ( rhs ) of ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) as @xmath89 however , the following asymptotic result suggests that the bcrb is expected to increase ( and thus the accuracy of map - aware estimation to worsen ) as @xmath25 gets larger : if @xmath90 the bcrb tends to the crb ( since the map support @xmath91 and the contribution coming from prior information vanishes the prior expressed by ( [ eq : uniform_map ] ) becomes `` improper '' ( see ( * ? ? ? 4.2 ) ) . ] ) which always takes on a bigger value ( see point 1 ) . only the smallest elements in the set @xmath88 ( @xmath87 ) significantly contribute to the sum @xmath92 ( @xmath93 ) appearing in ( [ eq : bfim_map_generic_mult_intervals ] ) and ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) and , consequently , may appreciably influence estimation accuracy ; in the limit , if @xmath94 ( @xmath95 ) for some @xmath96 and @xmath30 ( @xmath97 and @xmath29 ) , then the information about @xmath29 ( @xmath30 ) coordinate becomes infinite because the agent is constrained to lie , for those values of @xmath96 and @xmath30 ( @xmath97 and @xmath29 ) , in a single point of the map support . 4 . the matrices @xmath81 ( [ eq : bfim_map_generic_mult_intervals ] ) and @xmath85 ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) can be easily put in a closed form when @xmath87 and @xmath88 are step functions ( i.e. , the map is made by union of rectangles ) . further insights can be obtained taking a specific class of maps into consideration . in particular , here we focus on the case of a map without obstructions , i.e. , characterized by a support @xmath23 such that @xmath98 and @xmath99 @xmath100 ( note that convex maps belong to this class ) ; under these assumptions , it is easy to show that @xmath75 ( [ eq : bfim_map_generic_mult_intervals ] ) can be simplified as @xmath101 from the rhs of the last expression it can be easily inferred that : @xmath102dy,\right.\nonumber \\ & \left.\frac{\sigma_{y}^{3}}{2\mathcal{a_{r}}}\int_{\mathcal{x}}\left[\sum_{m\in\mathcal{n}_{v}^{o}(x)}\zeta\left(\frac{h_{m}(x)}{\sigma_{y}}\right)+\sum_{m\in\mathcal{n}_{v}^{e}(x)}\zeta_{ov}\left(\frac{\triangle h_{m}(x)}{\sigma_{y}},\frac{h_{m-1}(x)}{\sigma_{y}},\frac{h_{m+1}(x)}{\sigma_{y}}\right)\right]dx\right\ } \label{eq : zzb_generic}\end{aligned}\ ] ] 1 . even in this case the dependence of @xmath81 from @xmath25 is complicated . however , analysing ( [ eq : bfim_maps_nogap ] ) , it is easy to note that if @xmath91 ( so that @xmath90 ) the elements of @xmath81 tend to zero , so that the impact of prior information vanishes , as already mentioned above . 2 . the amount of information concerning the agent position along the @xmath29 ( @xmath30 ) axis direction is proportional to @xmath103 ( @xmath104 ) , where @xmath105 ( @xmath106 ) ; the last integral can be interpreted as the area of a `` virtual map '' characterized by the same projection @xmath57 ( @xmath56 ) as the real map , but whose width ( height ) at each point @xmath107 ( @xmath108 ) is the reciprocal of the width ( height ) of the real map . when prior information dominates over conditional information , the map support @xmath23 minimizing the trace of the bcrb under the constraint of a constant area @xmath25 has a square shape . in fact , if @xmath23 is a rectangle whose sides have lengths @xmath109 and @xmath110 , it is easy to show that @xmath111 ; then , if we set @xmath112 , @xmath113 , where @xmath114 and @xmath115 denote two real positive parameters , the trace of the inverse of ( [ eq : bfim_maps_nogap ] ) can be put in the form @xmath116 and is minimized for @xmath117 ( i.e. , for @xmath118 ) . 4 . in ( [ eq : bfim_maps_nogap ] ) the only contribution coming from the smoothing function @xmath77 is represented by the factor @xmath80 . further comments about the bcrb ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) will be provided in section [ sec : num_res ] , where this bound is computed for some specific maps . finally , it is important to point out that : a ) in localization problems bcrb s often provide useful insights @xcite , but these bounds are usually loose for low snr conditions @xcite , i.e. , when a priori information ( the map in this context ) plays a critical role due to the poor quality of observations ; b ) the bcrb analysis requires the adoption of the smoothed uniform pdf model for prior information ( see section [ sub : scenario_map ] ) . these considerations motivate the search for other bounds and , in particular , for the ezzb , which is usually tighter than the bcrb at low snrs @xcite and does not require ( [ eq : regularity_condition ] ) to hold ( so that the uniform model ( [ eq : uniform_map ] ) can be employed as it is ) ; this is further discussed in the following section . similarly to ( [ eq : bcrb ] ) , the ezzb for 2d localization can be expressed as @xmath119 where ( see appendix [ apd : proofs_zzb ] ) @xmath120p_{\text{\tiny{min}}}^{\mathbf{z}}\left(\boldsymbol{\rho},\boldsymbol{\rho}+h\mathbf{e}_{\nu}\right)h\ , d\boldsymbol{\rho}dh\label{eq : zzb_def}\ ] ] @xmath121 , @xmath122^{t}$ ] , @xmath123^{t}$ ] , @xmath124 represents the error probability referring to the likelihood ratio test in a binary detection problem involving the hypotheses @xmath125 @xmath126 and the observation @xmath20 ; finally , the integration domain is @xmath127 the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb])-([eq : zzb_def ] ) deserves the following comments : 1 . its formulation is obtained from the standard formulation ( see ( * ? ? ? * eq . ( 32 ) ) ) removing the so - called valley - filling function and the maximization operator , as shown in appendix [ apd : proofs_zzb ] ; these modifications simplify the derivation of the bound at the price of a small reduction in its tightness ; 2 . it exhibits a complicated dependence on the observation model , which comes into play in the evaluation of the probability @xmath128 ; 3 . it can not be put in a form similar to ( [ eq : j_somma ] ) , so that , generally speaking , the contribution coming from conditional information ( i.e. , observations ) can not be easily separated from that associated with a priori information ( map awareness in this case ) . as shown in appendix [ apd : proofs_zzb ] , for a uniform map and the observation model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb_def ] ) can be put in the form ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) shown at the top of this page where @xmath129 @xmath130 an accurate analysis of the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) and a comparison with the bcrb ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) lead to the following conclusions : 1 . the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) exhibits a similar dependence as the bcrb ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) in terms of the quantities @xmath131 , @xmath132 . in fact , if @xmath131 and/or @xmath133 increases , the trace of matrix @xmath134 in ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) gets larger , since @xmath135 ( [ eq : f_rho_def ] ) is a monotonically increasing function . 2 . in the same environment the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) takes on larger values than the bcrb ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) and results to be a bound tighter to the performance of optimal estimators . this is due to the fact that the terms @xmath135 appearing in the rhs of ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) give the ezzb approximately the same behaviour of the bcrb ; however , the ezzb also contains terms based on @xmath136 ( [ eq : f_gap_def ] ) , which is a positive valued function . the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) , unlike the bcrb , is influenced by the shape of map obstructions ( through the @xmath136 function and the @xmath137 , @xmath138 parameters ) . the two terms of ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) depending on the function @xmath136 ( [ eq : f_gap_def ] ) are influenced by the spatial extensions @xmath137 and @xmath138 of the obstructions separating _ consecutive _ map segments ( which are characterized by the lengths @xmath139 and @xmath140 , respectively ) ; in particular , the impact of obstructions is significant when @xmath49 ( @xmath141 ) is greater than one of @xmath139 ( @xmath140 ) . 5 . the integrals in the rhs of ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) can be easily put in a closed form when @xmath87 and @xmath88 are step functions ( i.e. , the map is made by union of rectangles ) . similarly to the bcrb , further insights can be obtained considering the class of maps without obstructions . in this case the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) simplifies as @xmath142^{2}}{2\mathcal{\mathcal{a_{r}}}\left[\lambda_{x}\left(h_{x},\mathcal{r}\right)-\exp\left(-\frac{h_{x}^{2}}{2\sigma_{x}^{2}}\right)\gamma_{x}\left(h_{x},\mathcal{r}\right)\right]},\sup_{h_{y}\in\mathbb{r}}\frac{\left[h_{y}\exp\left(-\frac{h_{y}^{2}}{8\sigma_{y}^{2}}\right)\lambda_{y}\left(h_{y},\mathcal{r}\right)\right]^{2}}{2\mathcal{\mathcal{a_{r}}}\left[\lambda_{y}\left(h_{y},\mathcal{r}\right)-\exp\left(-\frac{h_{y}^{2}}{2\sigma_{y}^{2}}\right)\gamma_{y}\left(h_{y},\mathcal{r}\right)\right]}\right\ } \label{eq : wwb_generic}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath143 it is also worth mentioning that , if the map support @xmath23 can be expressed as the union of a set of disjoint rectangles ( all having parallel sides ) , the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb_maps_nogap ] ) can be simplified further , obtaining a closed - form bound . the result ( [ eq : zzb_maps_nogap ] ) deserves the following comments : 1 . the structure of its rhs is similar to that of the equivalent bfim ( [ eq : bfim_maps_nogap ] ) . despite the differences between the integrand functions , our numerical results show that in this case both the ezzb and the bcrb are tight and that the ezzb does not provide additional hints on localization accuracy with respect to the bcrb ( see section [ sec : num_res ] ) . 2 . the ezzb predicts the correct variance of map - aware estimation when the snr is very low whereas a specific assumption about the value of @xmath80 is required to obtain the same result in the bcrb case . for instance , let us consider a uniform map whose support @xmath23 is a rectangle whose sides have lengths @xmath109 and @xmath110 ; with model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) and for @xmath144 and @xmath145 ( i.e. , for a snr approaching zero ) , the bmse of the minimum mean square error ( mmse ) estimator tends to @xmath146 . the ezzb provides this exact result since the rhs of ( [ eq : zzb_maps_nogap ] ) can be put in the closed form @xmath147 and @xmath148 for a snr @xmath149 approaching zero around @xmath150 . ] . this result can be compared with its bcrb counterpart ; in this case , from ( [ eq : bfim_maps_nogap ] ) it can be inferred that @xmath151 , so that @xmath152 should be selected to match the correct variance . the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb_maps_nogap ] ) confirms that map - aware estimators should be expected to be more accurate than their map - unaware counterparts , at least for maps without obstructions : for instance , if a rectangular map of sides @xmath109 , @xmath110 is considered , then ( [ eq : zzb_rectangle_map ] ) is easily proved to be always smaller than @xmath153 ( because @xmath154 ) which is the trivial ezzb ) after proving that @xmath155 for @xmath156 . ] for the observation model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) when the map is unavailable ( i.e. , when no prior information is available ) . this derives from the fact that a priori information lowers the ezzb ( similarly to what occurs in the case of the crb and the bcrb ) ; this is a well - known result , but may not be evident in ( [ eq : zzb_maps_nogap ] ) . 4 . similarly to the bcrb , the dependence on the map area is complicated ; however , it should be expected that the elements of @xmath134 get larger when @xmath157 increases as suggested by the following asymptotic result : when @xmath90 the contribution coming from a priori information vanishes and the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb_rectangle_map ] ) tends to @xmath153 , i.e. , to the map - unaware ezzb , which is larger ( see point 3 ) . as already mentioned above , the ezzb allows us to understand the role played by some map features , which do not have any impact on the bcrb . however , our numerical results evidence that , for complex maps and , in particular , at very low snrs , this bound turns out to be somewhat far from the performance offered by a mmse estimator . this has motivated the derivation of the wwb @xcite , which can be tighter than the ezzb at very low - snrs . similarly to the bcrb and the ezzb ( see ( [ eq : bcrb ] ) and ( [ eq : zzb ] ) , respectively ) , the wwb , for 2-d localization , can be expressed as @xmath158 where @xcite @xmath159^{2}\right\ } } \label{eq : wwb_def}\ ] ] and @xmath160 @xmath161 are functions of the @xmath162 parameter ; moreover @xmath163 is a likelihood ratio and @xmath121 . note that ( [ eq : wwb_def ] ) can be obtained from ( * ? ? ? * eqs . ( 7)-(8 ) ) setting @xmath164 , @xmath165 for the wwb optimization parameters and @xmath166 , since we are interested in a bound on the variance ( not on the co - variance ) of the estimates of @xmath21 . as shown in appendix [ apd : proofs_wwb ] , for a uniform map and the observation model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) the wwb ( [ eq : wwb_def ] ) can be put in the form ( [ eq : wwb_generic ] ) shown at the top of the next page , where @xmath167 , @xmath168 denote the parameters to be optimized to make the bound tighter , @xmath169 and @xmath170 are functions of the parameters @xmath167 , @xmath168 and of the geometrical features of the map support @xmath23 ( dual expressions hold for @xmath171 and @xmath172 ) ; finally @xmath173}(h_{x})\label{eq : omega_def}\ ] ] @xmath174\\ w_{2 } & h\in[\triangle w+w_{2};\triangle w+w_{1}]\\ w_{tot}-h & h\in[\triangle w+w_{1};w_{tot } ] \end{cases}\label{eq : omega_ov_def}\end{gathered}\ ] ] @xmath175 note that the structure of * @xmath176 * ( [ eq : lambda_def ] ) is similar to that of some terms contained in the rhs of the ezzb ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) ; however , in the wwb the noise variances appear in some exponential functions ( [ eq : wwb_generic ] ) only . unfortunately , it is hard to infer from ( [ eq : wwb_generic ] ) any conclusion about the dependence of the wwb on the features of a given map ; this is mainly due to the presence of the @xmath177 operators and to the discontinuous behaviour of the functions @xmath178 and @xmath179 . despite this , the wwb may play an important role , since , as shown in section [ sec : num_res ] for specific maps , it is tighter than the bcrb and the ezzb at low - snrs . in the following section the general bounds provided above are evaluated for specific maps , so that some additional insights about the ultimate accuracy achieved by map - aware estimators can be obtained . of a `` l - shaped '' map ( map # 2).[fig : map_2d_lshape],width=288 ] of a map modelling the floor of a big building ( map # 3).[fig : map_2d_indoor_building],width=288 ] the bounds illustrated in the previous section have been evaluated for the following 3 specific maps : 1 . map # 1 : a unidimensional map whose support @xmath23 consists of @xmath180 disjoint segments ( denoted @xmath181 and @xmath182 in the following ) having the same length @xmath183 and separated by @xmath184 meters ; 2 . map # 2 : the `` l - shaped '' 2-d map shown in fig . [ fig : map_2d_lshape ] and fully described by the set @xmath185 @xmath186 of geometrical parameters ; 3 . map # 3 : the 2-d map shown in fig . [ fig : map_2d_indoor_building ] ; note that such a map models the floor of a large building and is quite complex , so that its geometrical parameters are not given and analytical bounds are not evaluated for it ; instead , some numerical results generated by means of computer simulations will be illustrated . it is important to point out that maps # 2 and # 3 are examples of 2-d _ rectangular _ uniform maps , i.e. , each of them is characterised by a support @xmath23 that can be represented as the union of non - overlapping rectangles , all having parallel sides ; such non - overlapping rectangles form the so called _ rectangular covering _ of the map support @xmath23 @xcite . note that any map characterised by a support of _ arbitrary _ shape can be always approximated , up to an arbitrary precision , by a rectangular map if a proper covering , containing a sufficiently large number of rectangles , is selected . for this reason , maps # 2 and # 3 are relevant and practical examples . map # 1 can be also deemed relevant from a practical point of view since it can be thought of as a transversal slice of a 2-d map ( consisting , for instance , of two road lanes or two rooms facing each other ) ; in addition , such a simple scenario allows to acquire more insights than maps # 2 and # 3 , as shown later . in all cases the observation model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) has been adopted ( with @xmath187 and @xmath188 in the 1-d and 2-d scenarios , respectively ) and the tightness of the bounds has been assessed comparing them with the root mean square error ( rmse ) performance of optimal estimators evaluated by means of extensive computer simulations . in addition , in accordance with the theoretical arguments of paragraph [ sub : zzb ] ( see the comments to ( [ eq : zzb_maps_nogap ] ) ) , @xmath152 has been selected in the evaluation of all the bcrb results illustrated in this section . finally , in our simulations @xmath189 realizations of the random parameter @xmath21 have been generated according to a uniform distribution over the map support @xmath23 ; then gaussian noise samples ( characterized by @xmath190 if not explicitly stated ) have been added to generate the noisy observations , according to ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) . * bounds - * the bcrb , the ezzb and wwb for map # 1 are ( see ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) , ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) , and ( [ eq : wwb_generic ] ) , respectively ) @xmath191 @xmath192\label{eq : map1_zzb}\ ] ] and @xmath193 , respectively , where @xmath194}\label{eq : map1_wwb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath195 is the snr , @xmath196 , @xmath197 and @xmath198 . it is important to point out that that no approximations have been adopted in the derivations of the bcrb , the ezzb and the wwb for the considered 1-d scenario , so that ( [ eq : map1_bcrb])-([eq : map1_wwb ] ) represent _ exact _ bounds ( of course , a smoothed uniform map has been assumed for the bcrb only ) . + * estimators - * map - aware localization can be accomplished exploiting the mmse estimator @xmath199 where @xmath200 is a normalization factor , or the maximum - a - posteriori ( map ) estimator @xmath201 on the contrary , if the map is unknown , the ( map - unaware ) maximum likelihood ( ml ) estimator @xmath202 can be used ( obviously , the resulting estimate has the same variance @xmath203 as the observation noise ) . note that the rmse performance of these estimators is influenced by the geometrical parameters @xmath183 and @xmath184 and by the noise standard deviation @xmath204 . + * numerical results * * - * figs . [ fig : map1_vs_noise ] and [ fig : map1_vs_deltax ] compare the square roots of the bcrb , ezzb and wwb bounds @xmath205 , @xmath206 , @xmath207 and the rmse of @xmath208 , @xmath209 and @xmath210 versus @xmath149 ( with @xmath183 and @xmath184 fixed ) and @xmath184 ( with @xmath183 and @xmath204 fixed ) , respectively . for the mmse ( [ eq : mmse_estimator_map_1 ] ) , map ( [ eq : map_estimator_map_1 ] ) and ml estimators . map # 1 , @xmath211 and @xmath212 are assumed . the bcrb ( [ eq : map1_bcrb ] ) , ezzb ( [ eq : map1_zzb ] ) and wwb ( [ eq : map1_wwb ] ) are shown for comparison.[fig : map1_vs_noise],width=336 ] for the mmse ( [ eq : mmse_estimator_map_1 ] ) , map ( [ eq : map_estimator_map_1 ] ) and ml estimators . map # 1 , @xmath211 and @xmath190 are assumed . the bcrb ( [ eq : map1_bcrb ] ) , ezzb ( [ eq : map1_zzb ] ) and wwb ( [ eq : map1_wwb ] ) are shown for comparison.[fig : map1_vs_deltax],width=336 ] these results evidence that : 1 . the bcrb is tight at high snrs only ; in such conditions all the bounds and the rmse of both map - aware and map - unaware estimators tend to @xmath204 ( see fig . [ fig : map1_vs_noise ] ) : conditional knowledge dominates . 2 . unlike the bcrb , the ezzb and , in particular , the wwb exhibit a dependence on @xmath184 and are much tighter ( see fig . [ fig : map1_vs_deltax ] ) to the performance of optimal estimators and , for this reason , represent more useful tools for predicting system accuracy . 3 . the role played by map knowledge in estimation accuracy becomes significant as @xmath149 decreases , i.e. , as the quality of the observations gets worse ; indeed map knowledge prevents the bounds and the rmse of the map - aware estimators from diverging ( note that in fig . [ fig : map1_vs_noise ] the map - unaware rmse diverges for @xmath213 ) . the performance gap among the mmse , the map and especially the ml estimators is significant for low snrs ( see fig . [ fig : map1_vs_noise ] ) . if the gap @xmath184 is small ( i.e. , if the segments @xmath181 and @xmath182 are close ) , the rmse of the considered estimators is low . on the contrary , if @xmath184 increases , the rmse gets larger , reaches a maximum and then decreases , tending to @xmath214 ( see fig . [ fig : map1_vs_deltax ] ) . this behaviour can be explained as follows : if the noise level is large with respect to @xmath184 , the estimate of the agent position may belong to the wrong segment , thus resulting in a large error . however , a further increase of @xmath184 entails a reduction of the rmse , since , for a large spacing between @xmath181 and @xmath182 , it is unlikely that the wrong segment is selected in map - aware estimation . and @xmath183 for the mmse estimator ( [ eq : mmse_estimator_map_1 ] ) . map # 1 and @xmath190 are assumed . the data has been smoothed to remove simulation noise and improve readability.[fig : mmse_map1_surface],width=288 ] further insights are provided by fig . [ fig : mmse_map1_surface ] , which shows the rmse versus @xmath183 and @xmath184 for the mmse estimator ( note that the mmse data shown in fig . [ fig : map1_vs_deltax ] can be extracted from fig . [ fig : mmse_map1_surface ] setting @xmath211 ) . in fact , the numerical results shown in this figure evidence that : 1 . for @xmath215 the rmse decreases only mildly as @xmath184 gets larger and the main geometric feature of the map affecting estimation accuracy is the area of @xmath23 ; in this case a map - aware estimator still provides an advantage over map - unaware counterparts ( the maximum rmse for the first estimator is @xmath216 , as shown in fig . [ fig : mmse_map1_surface ] , and is smaller than @xmath190 , which represents the rmse for the ml estimator , as shown in fig . [ fig : map1_vs_deltax ] ) . 2 . for @xmath217 the rmse reaches its maximum for @xmath218 ; for this reason , any combination of the geometric parameters and noise level satisfying such equality should be avoided . based on the numerical results shown in fig . [ fig : mmse_map1_surface ] , we can draw some observations about an indoor localization system operating in two adjacent rooms , each having width @xmath219 and separated by a wall having thickness @xmath220 , and processing noisy observations characterized by @xmath190 ( realistic value for rss systems , see @xcite ) . from fig . [ fig : mmse_map1_surface ] we can infer that , even if @xmath221 , since @xmath222 is appreciably smaller than @xmath223 , the advantage in terms of rmse provided by a map modelling wall obstructions is small with respect to that offered by a map modelling the environment as a single connected room having width @xmath224 . in fact , in fig . [ fig : mmse_map1_surface ] , if the presence of the wall is accounted for , the map - aware estimator performance is associated with the point @xmath225 , whereas , if it is not , with the point @xmath226 . unless the room size @xmath219 is very small ( i.e. , @xmath227 ) the two `` operating points '' will be very close ( due to the small value of @xmath222 ) and the resulting rmse values will be similar so that , in this case , a map modelling wall obstructions is not very useful . note also that , if the quality of observations improves substantially ( i.e. , @xmath228 ) , map information plays a less significant role than the conditional information provided by such observations , so that a detailed a priori map modelling walls is not useful in this case , too . on the contrary , maps may play an important role in localization in outdoor environments , where the region characterized by @xmath217 and @xmath229 in the @xmath230 plane is easier to reach , since noisy observations and large obstructions should be expected ; for this reason , in this case the presence of the obstructions in map modelling should not be neglected . @xmath231},\right.\left.\sup_{h_{y}\in\mathbb{r}}\frac{h_{y}^{2}\exp\left(-\frac{h_{y}^{2}}{4\sigma^{2}}\right)\lambda_{y}^{2}\left(h_{y},\mathcal{r}\right)}{2\mathcal{a_{r}}\left[\lambda_{y}\left(h_{y},\mathcal{r}\right)-\exp\left(-\frac{h_{y}^{2}}{2\sigma^{2}}\right)\gamma_{y}\left(h_{y},\mathcal{r}\right)\right]}\right\ } \label{eq : map2_wwb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] * bounds - * let us now focus on map # 2 . the bcrb and the ezzb in this case are ( see ( [ eq : bcrb_generic ] ) and ( [ eq : zzb_generic ] ) , respectively ) @xmath232 @xmath233,\right.\notag\\ & \quad\left.\frac{\sigma^{2}}{2\rho_{\mathcal{a}}}\left[w_{1}\zeta\left(\frac{h_{1}+h_{2}}{\sigma}\right)+w_{2}\zeta\left(\frac{h_{1}}{\sigma}\right)\right]\right\ } \label{eq : map2_zzb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] respectively , where @xmath234 . the wwb derived from ( [ eq : wwb_generic ] ) is shown in ( [ eq : map2_wwb ] ) at the top of the next page ; in ( [ eq : map2_wwb ] ) the @xmath176 and @xmath235 functions have the expressions @xmath236 @xmath237 respectively ( dual expressions hold for @xmath171 and @xmath172 ) . note that @xmath238 and @xmath239 ( @xmath240 and @xmath241 ) play a symmetric role in ( [ eq : map2_bcrb ] ) , ( [ eq : map2_zzb ] ) and ( [ eq : map2_wwb ] ) ; this suggests that a change in the geometrical features improving @xmath242 will reduce @xmath243 and vice versa , when the overall area @xmath25 of the map is kept constant . + * estimators - * map - aware localization can be accomplished exploiting the mmse estimator @xmath244=(1/c(\mathbf{z}))\iint_{\mathcal{r}}\mathbf{p}\,\mathcal{n}\left(\mathbf{z};\mathbf{p},\boldsymbol{\sigma}\right)d\mathbf{p}\label{eq : mmse_estimator_map_2}\ ] ] where @xmath245 . on the contrary , the ( map - unaware ) ml estimate is given by @xmath246 . + * numerical results - * fig . [ fig : mmse_map2 ] shows the square roots of the bcrb components @xmath205 , @xmath247 , its trace @xmath248 and the rmse of the estimators @xmath249 , @xmath250 , @xmath251 and @xmath252 ( the ezzb ( [ eq : map2_zzb ] ) and wwb ( [ eq : map2_wwb ] ) are not shown to ease the reading ) ; @xmath190 , @xmath253 and @xmath254 have been assumed in this case . in addition , when increasing @xmath241 , @xmath238 is reduced according to the law @xmath255 so that the equality @xmath256 always holds . from these results it is inferred that : 1 . as already noted for map # 1 , map - unaware estimation , which is unaffected by a change in the geometrical features of the map , provides a worse accuracy than its map - aware counterpart ( the rmse of ml estimator is @xmath257 larger than that of its mmse counterpart ) . 2 . increasing @xmath241 and decreasing @xmath238 changes the aspect ratio of a portion of the map ( see fig . [ fig : map_2d_lshape ] ) ; this results in an appreciable reduction in the rmse of the parameter @xmath30 , but also in a mild increase of the rmse of the parameter @xmath29 . therefore , the improvement along one direction is compensated for by the worsening in the orthogonal direction , so that no significant advantage for the rmse of @xmath251 is found . the last result suggests that when the accuracy in the estimation of a given element of @xmath21 is improved maintaining @xmath25 constant , a reduction in the estimation accuracy of the other element should be expected , so that that the overall accuracy does not change much . for the mmse estimator ( [ eq : mmse_estimator_map_2 ] ) . map # 2 ( fig . [ fig : map_2d_lshape ] ) , @xmath190 and @xmath256 are assumed . the bcrb components @xmath205 , @xmath247 , @xmath248 ( see ( [ eq : map2_bcrb ] ) ) and the rmse for the ml estimator are also shown for comparison.[fig : mmse_map2],width=336 ] * observation model * * - * finally , let us analyse the rmse performance of localization systems operating in the environment described by map # 3 in two cases : a ) the map - aware estimator knows map # 3 exactly ; b ) the map - aware estimator assumes that the localization environment is described by the bounding box of map # 3 . note that the last case is significant from a practical point of view , since , in the absence of detailed information about the floor of a building , the bounding box represents the best a priori model which can be adopted to describe the floor itself . + in addition , in this paragraph model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) is compared against a more specific counterpart , called `` ranging observation model '' in the following ; for such modelling we assume that 1 ) the observations are acquired by 4 anchors placed in the map corners ; 2 ) the observation provided by the @xmath5-th anchor can be expressed as @xmath258 with @xmath259 , where @xmath260 represents gaussian noise with variance @xmath203 and @xmath261 represents the @xmath5-th anchor position . the scenario considered in this example is helpful to assess 1 ) to what extent a detailed knowledge of the geometrical features of a map can improve localization accuracy with respect to the availability of a simplified map model ( like a bounding box model ) and 2 ) if a localization system based on the gaussian model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) can exhibit a similar behaviour as that of a localization system based on ( [ eq : obs_model_ranging ] ) , at least in the considered cases . * * + * estimators * * - * given the model ( [ eq : obs_model_ranging ] ) , the map estimator can be expressed as @xmath262 where @xmath263^{t}$ ] and @xmath264 . if the observation model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) is adopted in place of ( [ eq : obs_model_ranging ] ) , the map estimator @xmath265 is obtained , where @xmath266 . + * numerical results * * - * fig . [ fig : mmse_map3 ] compares the rmse performance achieved by the map estimators ( [ eq : map_estimator_map_3_toa ] ) and ( [ eq : map_estimator_map_3_gaussian ] ) versus @xmath204 in cases a and b. these results show that : 1 . surprisingly the selection of the map model ( map # 3 in case a or its bounding box in case b ) does not affect the mmse estimation performance , whatever the model for the observations . this result can be motivated as follows . for each value of @xmath204 , there is some portion of the map where the combination of noise level and geometrical features ( see the analysis of map # 1 ) entails a large rmse and where a detailed map ( map # 3 ) does not provide a substantial advantage over simpler maps ( e.g. , the bounding box ) ; since the bayesian rmse results from an average of the agent position over the entire map , it is biased by such portions of the map for each value of @xmath204 . such an effect influences also any global bayesian bound , like the bcrb , the ezzb and the wwb : their values result from an average over the entire parameter space ( in this case @xmath23 ) and can be strongly influenced by the parameter values ( in this case , the values of @xmath21 ) characterized by the largest errors @xcite . note also that local bounds ( e.g. , crb ) , which model the parameters to be estimated as deterministic variables , do not suffer from this problem , but can not exploit a priori information and represent performance limits for unbiased estimators only @xcite . in our case study a detailed knowledge of map # 3 ( case a ) provides , in various subsets of @xmath23 , a substantial improvement with respect to the knowledge of the bounding box ( case b ) , but the effects of such subsets are then `` averaged out '' when evaluating the bayesian rmse , as shown in fig . [ fig : mmse_map3 ] . 2 . the adoption of the gaussian observation model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) entails a worse accuracy than that provided by the ranging observation model ( [ eq : obs_model_ranging ] ) . this can be related to the placement of the anchors and to their number ; in fact , range observations coming from anchors displaced with a constant angular spacing allow to average out the measurement errors better than the positional observation of the gaussian model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) when the same noise variance @xmath203 is assumed in both models and one about @xmath30 ) are considered since 2-d localization is performed . ] . if the offset between the curves referring to the gaussian and the ranging model is neglected , our results show that both curves exhibit the same behaviour , when @xmath204 is varied ; this is an hint to the fact that the insights obtained from the bounds derived for the model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) may be useful also in the analysis of systems employing different observation models ( like ( [ eq : obs_model_ranging ] ) ) . finally , comment 1 ) suggests that , when assessing the improvement in localization accuracy coming from map awareness , the evaluation of the overall rmse does not provide sufficient information about the importance of a given map . in fact , if the effects of different portions of the maps are analysed , it is found that some of them play a more relevant role than other ones ; in this perspective , the insights and the intuition acquired from the results referring to map # 1 are very useful , given that map # 1 can be thought of as a transversal slice of a subset of any 2-d map . for the map estimators ( [ eq : map_estimator_map_3_toa ] ) and ( [ eq : map_estimator_map_3_gaussian ] ) , using either the gaussian observation model ( see ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) ) or the ranging observation model ( see ( [ eq : obs_model_ranging ] ) ) . the a priori map is map # 3 ( case a ) or its bounding box ( case b ) . the rmse of ml estimators is also shown for comparison . [ fig : mmse_map3],width=336 ] in this manuscript the impact of map awareness on localization performance has been investigated from a theoretical perspective , evaluating different accuracy bounds . such bounds provide some general indications about the role and importance of this form of a priori information . our study has evidenced that , unluckily , the tighter is an accuracy bound , the more complicated is its dependence on the geometric parameters of maps . this has motivated the analysis of the developed bounds in specific environments ; in particular , three different maps have been considered and , for each of them , the accuracy bounds have been evaluated and compared with the performance offered by map - aware and map - unaware estimators . our analytical and numerical results have evidenced that : a ) map - aware estimation accuracy can be related to some features of the map ( e.g. , its shape and area ) even though , in general , the relation is complicated ; b ) maps are really useful in the presence of some combination of low snrs and specific geometrical features of the map ( e.g. , the size of obstructions ) ; c ) for some combinations of snrs and geometrical features , there is no need of refined maps since knowledge of map details provides only a negligible performance gain ; d ) in a given environment the ezzb and , in particular , the wwb are usually much tighter than the bcrb ; e ) in the cases of maps containing many features , the importance of map awareness is better captured by the analysis of subsets of those map . future improvements include the development of map - aware bounds for specific observation models ; in particular models including bias due to the non - line of sight ( nlos ) propagation may unveil important insights about map - aware localization systems operating in nlos conditions . finally , it is important to point out that all the bounds derived in this manuscript can be also exploited for other estimation problems ( provided that the vector of random parameters to be estimated is characterized by a uniform a priori pdf ) and can be easily generalized to the case of estimation of an @xmath267-dimensional parameter vector , with @xmath268 . in this appendix the derivation of ( [ eq : bfim_map_generic_mult_intervals ] ) and ( [ eq : bfim_maps_nogap ] ) is sketched . to begin , we consider a real function @xmath77 having the following properties : aaa it is continuous and differentiable ; @xmath269 ; @xmath270 ; @xmath271 ; its support is the interval is the same as that adopted for @xmath21 and @xmath20 ( see sec . [ sec : scenario ] ) . ] @xmath272 $ ] ; @xmath273 . these properties have the following implications : a ) @xmath77 is a pdf function ( see p.1-p.3 ) ; b ) an a - priori fi @xmath80 can be computed for it ( the regularity condition p.4 ensures the fi existence ) @xcite ; c ) @xmath274 can be used to model bounded statistical distributions ( i.e. , maps ) , eventually after some scaling and translation ( see p.5 , p.6 ) . as far as the last point is concerned , it is worth mentioning that @xmath275 with @xmath276 , is still a pdf function and its fi is @xmath277 . any function @xmath274 sharing the properties p.1-p.6 represents a `` smoothing function '' ; specific examples of smoothing functions can be found in @xcite . any smoothing function @xmath77 can be used to define the analytical model of a smoothed uniform map . to show how this can be done , we start considering a unidimensional ( 1-d ) scenario first , where the agent position to estimate is the scalar @xmath29 . the support @xmath278 of a 1-d uniform map can be always represented as the union of @xmath279 disjoint segments spaced by @xmath280 segments where the map pdf @xmath281 is equal to 0 . let the @xmath279 segments of the support @xmath23 be indexed by the odd numbers of the set @xmath282 and let @xmath283 ( @xmath284 ) denote the centre ( width ) of the @xmath96-th segment , with @xmath285 . then the map pdf @xmath281 associated with this scenario can be expressed as @xmath286 where @xmath287 . the a priori fi associated with @xmath281 is given by @xmath288 let us extend these results to 2-d maps . exploiting some definitions given in section [ sec : scenario ] and assuming that the smoothing along @xmath29 and that along @xmath30 are independent , the pdf for an arbitrary smoothed uniform 2-d map can be put in the form . ] @xmath289 where @xmath290 ( @xmath291 ) and @xmath40 ( @xmath41 ) denote the centre and the length , respectively of the @xmath96-th ( @xmath97-th ) segment . let us now compute the elements of the bfim @xmath75 associated with this pdf ( see ( @xmath292 ) ) . the analysis of ( [ eq : pdf_2d_map ] ) can be connected to that of ( [ eq : pdf_1d_multirect ] ) exploiting the formula ( iterated expectation ) @xmath293_{1,1 } & \triangleq\mathbb{e}_{\mathbf{p}}\left\ { \left(\frac{\partial\ln f(\mathbf{p})}{\partial x}\right)^{2}\right\ } \nonumber \\ & = \mathbb{e}_{y}\left\ { \mathbb{e}_{x|y}\left\ { \left(\frac{\partial\ln f(\mathbf{p})}{\partial x}\right)^{2}\right\ } \right\ } \label{eq : bfim_2d_generic_map_x}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and adopting the approximation @xmath294 where @xmath295 . it is worth noting that in ( [ eq : pdf_2d_map_approx ] ) the smoothing along the @xmath30 coordinate is ignored . this is a reasonable approximation whenever the smoothing only modifies a narrow area of the edges of @xmath23 compared to the area of the flat regions of ( [ eq : pdf_2d_map ] ) ; the selection of a proper smoothing function ensures that such a condition holds ( see sec . [ sub : scenario_map ] and @xcite ) . + thanks to ( [ eq : pdf_2d_map_approx ] ) , the evaluation of the inner expectation in ( [ eq : bfim_2d_generic_map_x ] ) is equivalent to that of the fi referring to a 1-d map which consists of @xmath296 segments having widths @xmath88 and centred around the points @xmath297 ; for this reason , from ( [ eq : pdf_1d_multirect])-(@xmath298 ) it is easily inferred that @xmath299 substituting the last result in the rhs of ( [ eq : bfim_2d_generic_map_x ] ) produces @xmath293_{1,1 } & \simeq\frac{\mathrm{j}_{s}}{\mathcal{\mathcal{a_{r}}}}\int_{\mathcal{y}}\sum_{n\in\mathcal{n}_{h}^{o}(y)}\frac{1}{w_{n}(y)}f(y)dy\nonumber \\ & \simeq\frac{\mathrm{j}_{s}}{\mathcal{\mathcal{a_{r}}}}\int_{\mathcal{y}}\sum_{n\in\mathcal{n}_{h}^{o}(y)}\frac{dy}{w_{n}(y)}\label{eq : bfim_2d_generic_map_xbis}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath300 is the pdf of @xmath30 only and it has been ignored in the integral since the smoothing only affects a small portion of the integration domain ( see section [ sec : scenario ] ) . a similar approach can be adopted in the evaluation of @xmath301_{2,2}$ ] ( ignoring , in this case , the smoothing along @xmath29 ) ; this leads to @xmath302_{2,2}\simeq\frac{\mathrm{j}_{s}}{\mathcal{\mathcal{a_{r}}}}\int_{\mathcal{x}}\sum_{m\in\mathcal{n}_{v}^{o}(x)}\frac{1}{h_{m}(x)}dx\label{eq : bfim_2d_generic_map_y}\ ] ] note also that the approximated results ( [ eq : bfim_2d_generic_map_xbis])-([eq : bfim_2d_generic_map_y ] ) become exact if @xmath23 is a rectangle having its sides parallel to the reference axes , since in this case the smoothing along @xmath29 is truly independent from the smoothing along @xmath30 . for the same reason the cross terms @xmath301_{2,1}$ ] and @xmath301_{1,2}$ ] are exactly equal to zero for a rectangle ; however since 2-d maps usually exhibit a weak correlation between the variables @xmath29 and @xmath30 , these terms can be neglected ; this leads to ( [ eq : bfim_map_generic_mult_intervals ] ) , from which ( [ eq : bfim_maps_nogap ] ) is easily obtained assuming that @xmath98 and @xmath99 @xmath100 . in this appendix the ezzb ( @xmath303 ) is derived following a procedure conceptually similar to the one provided in ( * ? ? ? we start from the identity ( see @xcite ) @xmath304 where @xmath305_{\nu}$ ] . following @xcite , the probability appearing in ( [ eq : zzb_1 ] ) can be put in the form @xmath306 where @xmath307 denotes the pdf of @xmath21 . let @xmath308 and @xmath309 , where @xmath310 is some function of the integration variable of ( [ eq : zzb_1 ] ) . if the integration domain of ( [ eq : zzb_2 ] ) is constrained to be a subset @xmath311 of the map support @xmath23 , such that @xmath312 and @xmath313 , then , dividing and multiplying the rhs of ( [ eq : zzb_2 ] ) by @xmath314 , produces the expression ( * ? ? ? ( 22)-(30 ) ) @xmath315p_{\text{\tiny{min}}}^{\mathbf{z}}(\boldsymbol{\rho},\boldsymbol{\rho}+\boldsymbol{\delta}(h))d\boldsymbol{\rho}\label{eq : zzb_3}\end{gathered}\ ] ] ( @xmath316 is defined in sec . [ sub : zzb ] ) which holds for any @xmath310 satisfying the equality @xmath317 , where @xmath318 . note that ( [ eq : zzb_3 ] ) generalizes ( * ? ? ? * eq . ( 30 ) ) to the case where the pdf @xmath307 of the parameter to estimate has a bounded support . here @xmath319 is selected so that @xmath320 . then substituting ( [ eq : zzb_3 ] ) in ( [ eq : zzb_1 ] ) produces ( @xmath303 ) , where the integration domains of @xmath321 and @xmath322 have been merged in the set @xmath323 . like in the previous appendix , let us evaluate now ( @xmath303 ) for a 1-d uniform map whose support @xmath278 consists of the union of @xmath279 disjoint segments . in the following such segments are indexed by the odd numbers of the set @xmath282 and the lower ( upper ) limit of the segment @xmath285 is denoted @xmath324 ( @xmath325 ) , where @xmath283 ( @xmath284 ) represents the centre ( length ) of the segment itself . moreover , it is assumed , without any loss of generality , that @xmath326 . in this 1-d scenario ( @xmath303 ) simplifies as @xmath327p_{\text{\tiny{min}}}^{z}(\tau,\tau+h)h\ , d\tau\ : dh\label{eq : zzb_1d_1}\ ] ] where @xmath328 , @xmath329 and @xmath330 represents the minimum error probability of a binary detector which , on the basis of a noisy datum @xmath331 and a likelihood ratio test , has to select one of the following two hypotheses @xmath332 and @xmath333 . note that , for any @xmath334 , we have that @xmath335 ( with @xmath336 ) , because of the uniformity of the considered map . if the gaussian observation model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) adopted to the 1-d case is assumed , the average error probability of the above mentioned detector is easily shown to be @xmath337 ( where @xmath204 denotes the standard deviation of the noise observation model ) , which is independent of @xmath338 ; then , ( [ eq : zzb_1d_1 ] ) simplifies as @xmath339 where @xmath340 , @xmath341 and @xmath342 can be shown to be 2-d domain consisting of the union of @xmath279 triangles and @xmath343 parallelograms in the plane @xmath344 , as exemplified by fig . [ fig : appendix ] , which refers to the case @xmath345 . in particular , the contribution to the rhs of ( [ eq : zzb_1d_3 ] ) from the @xmath5-th triangle @xmath346 can be shown to be @xmath347 , where @xmath348 , @xmath349 , the function @xmath350 is defined in ( [ eq : f_rho_def ] ) and @xmath351 ( see @xcite for more details ) . as far as the parallelograms are concerned , we retain only the contributions coming from @xmath352 parallelograms @xmath353 with @xmath354 ( see fig . [ fig : appendix ] ) ; such contributions are given by @xmath355 , where @xmath356 , @xmath357 and @xmath358 is defined in ( [ eq : f_gap_def ] ) for @xmath359 ( it can be shown that @xmath360 ) . note that the contributions to ( [ eq : zzb_1d_3 ] ) coming from the discarded parallelograms are always positive since @xmath361 for @xmath362 . then , substituting the above mentioned contributions in ( [ eq : zzb_1d_3 ] ) produces the lower bound @xmath363\label{eq : zzb_1d}\ ] ] for the ezzb . the approach developed for a 1-d uniform map can be extended to a 2-d scenario keeping into account that a ) the term @xmath124 of ( @xmath303 ) takes on a similar form as @xmath330 of ( [ eq : zzb_1d_1 ] ) , b ) the integral on @xmath322 can be decomposed in a couple of nested integrals , one over @xmath56 and the other one over @xmath57 , and c ) eq . ( [ eq : zzb_1d ] ) can be exploited for the inner integral . further details can be found in @xcite . in this appendix we first derive the wwb for a @xmath364-d uniform map characterized by a support @xmath23 , assuming the observation model ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) . note that this derivation can be easily generalised to a @xmath267-d scenario . to begin , we note that , since @xmath365 ( see ( [ eq : obs_model_gaussian ] ) ) , the likelihood ratio @xmath366 ( [ eq : likelihood_ratio ] ) is given by @xmath367 @xmath368 . then , it is not difficult to prove that the expectation appearing in the numerator of ( [ eq : wwb_def ] ) is given by @xmath369 where @xmath370 is a slice of the integration domain @xmath371 involved in the evaluation of the ezzb @xcite and @xmath121 . the expectation appearing in the denominator of ( [ eq : wwb ] ) can be expressed as @xmath372^{2}\right\ } \\ \shoveleft=\mathbb{e}_{\mathbf{z},\mathbf{p}}\left\ { l\left(\mathbf{z};\mathbf{p}+h_{\nu}\mathbf{e}_{\nu},\mathbf{p}\right)\right\ } + \mathbb{e}_{\mathbf{z},\mathbf{p}}\left\ { l\left(\mathbf{z};\mathbf{p}-h_{\nu}\mathbf{e}_{\nu},\mathbf{p}\right)\right\ } \\ -2\cdot\mathbb{e}_{\mathbf{z},\mathbf{p}}\left\ { l^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\mathbf{z};\mathbf{p}+h_{\nu}\mathbf{e}_{\nu},\mathbf{p}\right)l^{\frac{1}{2}}\left(\mathbf{z};\mathbf{p}-h_{\nu}\mathbf{e}_{\nu},\mathbf{p}\right)\right\ } \end{gathered}\ ] ] i.e. , as the sum of three terms which are denoted @xmath373 , @xmath374 and @xmath375 , respectively , in the following . it is important to note that @xmath376 and @xmath377 where @xmath378 and the functions @xmath379 and @xmath380 are defined in ( [ eq : lambda_def ] ) and ( [ eq : gamma_def ] ) . then , substituting ( [ eq : wwb_num ] ) , ( [ eq : wwb_a_b ] ) , ( [ eq : wwb_c ] ) in ( [ eq : wwb_def ] ) produces ( [ eq : wwb_generic ] ) . finally , it is worth pointing out that @xmath379 ( [ eq : lambda_def ] ) and @xmath380 ( [ eq : gamma_def ] ) can be explicitly related to the functions @xmath381 , @xmath382 , @xmath383 , @xmath384 introduced in section [ sec : scenario ] . to clarify this point , let us focus on @xmath176 and @xmath235 which can be derived , for a given ordinate @xmath30 , analysing the integration domain @xmath385 if the variables @xmath341 and @xmath386 are defined , this domain can be put in the form @xmath387 which describes a slice of the @xmath344 plane of fig . [ fig : appendix ] . the contribution of the @xmath5-th triangle @xmath388 to @xmath389 ( @xmath390 ) is given by @xmath391 ( @xmath392 ) , where @xmath393 is defined in ( [ eq : omega_def ] ) , @xmath394 is defined in ( [ eq : omega_ov_def ] ) and @xmath395 is the slice of the map support @xmath23 at the ordinate @xmath30 . similarly , the contribution from the @xmath5-th parallelogram @xmath396 to @xmath397 is given by @xmath392 . therefore , the overall contribution to @xmath389 can be expressed as @xmath398 whereas that to @xmath390 as @xmath399 finally , integrating ( [ eq : sum1 ] ) and ( [ eq : sum2 ] ) produces ( [ eq : lambda_def ] ) and ( [ eq : gamma_def ] ) , respectively . and of its subsets @xmath400 and @xmath401 in the @xmath344 plane ( @xmath345 is assumed ) . note that the contribution from the `` discarded '' parallelogram is neglected in the evaluation of both ( [ eq : gamma_def])-([eq : lambda_def ] ) and ( [ eq : zzb_1d_3 ] ) . [ fig : appendix],width=336 ] f. gustafsson and f. gunnarsson , `` mobile positioning using wireless networks : possibilities and fundamental limitations based on available wireless network measurements , '' _ ieee signal process . mag . _ , vol . 22 , no . 4 , pp . 41 53 , jul . 2005 . s. gezici , z. tian , g. giannakis , h. kobayashi , a. molisch , h. poor , and z. sahinoglu , `` localization via ultra - wideband radios : a look at positioning aspects for future sensor networks , '' _ ieee signal process . mag . _ , vol . 22 , no . 4 , pp . 7084 , jul . 2005 . n. patwari , j. ash , s. kyperountas , a. o. hero , iii , r. moses , and n. correal , `` locating the nodes : cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks , '' _ ieee signal process . mag . _ , vol . 22 , no . 4 , pp . 5469 , jul . 2005 . s. beauregard , widyawan , and m. klepal , `` indoor pdr performance enhancement using minimal map information and particle filters , '' in _ ieee / ion position , location and navigation symp . _ , monterey , ca , 2008 , pp . 141147 . p. davidson , j. collin , and j. takala , `` application of particle filters for indoor positioning using floor plans , '' in _ proc . ubiquitous positioning indoor navigation and location based service conf . _ , kirkkonummi , 2010 , pp . 14 . m. anisetti , c. a. ardagna , v. bellandi , e. damiani , and s. reale , `` map - based location and tracking in multipath outdoor mobile networks , '' _ ieee trans . on wireless commun . _ , vol . 10 , no . 3 , pp . 814824 , mar . 2011 . d. nicholson and a. vecchio , `` bayesian bounds on parameter estimation accuracy for compact coalescing binary gravitational wave signals , '' _ physical review d _ , vol . 57 , no . 8 , pp . 45884599 , apr . f. montorsi and g. m. vitetta , `` on the performance limits of pilot - based estimation of bandlimited frequency - selective communication channels , '' _ ieee trans . on commun . _ , vol . 59 , no . 11 , pp . 29642969 , nov . 2011 . w. liou , j .- m . tan , and r. lee , `` minimum rectangular partition problem for simple rectilinear polygons , '' _ ieee trans . comput .- aided des . circuits syst . _ , vol . 9 , no . 7 , pp . 720733 , jul . 1990 . s. mazuelas , a. bahillo , r. m. lorenzo , p. fernandez , f. a. lago , e. garcia , j. blas , and e. j. abril , `` robust indoor positioning provided by real - time rssi values in unmodified wlan networks , '' _ ieee j. sel . topics signal process . _ , vol . 3 , no . 5 , pp . 821831 , oct . 2009 . t. routtenberg and j. tabrikian , `` a general class of outage error probability lower bounds in bayesian parameter estimation , '' _ ieee trans . on signal process . _ , vol . 60 , no . 5 , pp . 21522166 , may 2012 . f. montorsi and g. m. vitetta , `` technical report : detailed proofs of bounds for map - aware localization , '' university of modena and reggio emilia , tech . , 2012 , available online at http://frm.users.sourceforge.net/publications.html . francesco montorsi ( s06 ) received both the laurea degree ( _ cum laude _ ) and the laurea specialistica degree ( _ cum laude _ ) in electronic engineering from the university of modena and reggio emilia , italy , in 2007 and 2009 , respectively . he received the ph.d degree in information and communications technologies ( ict ) from the university of modena and reggio emilia in 2013 . he is employed as embedded system engineer for an ict company since 2013 . in 2011 he was a visiting phd student at the wireless communications and network science laboratory of massachusetts institute of technology ( mit ) . his research interests are in the area of localization and navigation systems , with emphasis on statistical signal processing ( linear and non - linear filtering , detection and estimation problems ) , model - based design and model - based performance assessment . dr . montorsi is a member of ieee communications society and served as a reviewer for the ieee transactions on wireless communications , ieee transactions on signal processing , ieee wireless communications letters and several ieee conferences . since 2009 , he has been a postdoctoral fellow in the wireless communication and network sciences laboratory at mit . he previously worked from 2006 to 2009 as a researcher and project manager in a spanish technological center , as well as a junior lecturer in the university of valladolid . his research interests are the application of mathematical and statistical theories to communications , localization , and navigation networks . mazuelas has served as a member of the technical program committee ( tpc ) for the ieee global communications conference ( globecom ) in 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 , the ieee international conference on ultra - wideband ( icuwb ) in 2011 , the 75th ieee vehicular technology conference 2012 , and the ieee wireless telecommunications symposium ( wts ) in 2010 and 2011 . he has received the 2012 ieee communications society fred w. ellersick prize , the best paper award from the ieee globecom in 2011 , the best paper award from the ieee icuwb in 2011 , and the young scientists prize for the best communication at the union radio - scientifique internationale ( ursi ) xxii symposium in 2007 . giorgio m. vitetta ( s89-m91-sm99 ) was born in reggio calabria , italy , in april 1966 . he received the dr . ing . degree in electronic engineering ( _ cum laude _ ) in 1990 , and the ph.d . degree in 1994 , both from the university of pisa , pisa , italy . from 1995 to 1998 , he was a research fellow with the department of information engineering , university of pisa . from 1998 to 2001 , he was an associate professor with the university of modena and reggio emilia , modena , italy , where he is currently a full professor . his main research interests lie in the broad area of communication theory , with particular emphasis on detection / equalization / synchronization algorithms for wireless communications , statistical modelling of wireless and powerline channels , ultrawideband communication techniques and applications of game theory to wireless communications . moe z. win ( s85-m87-sm97-f04 ) received both the ph.d . in electrical engineering and m.s . in applied mathematics as a presidential fellow at the university of southern california ( usc ) in 1998 . he received an m.s . in electrical engineering from usc in 1989 , and a b.s . ( _ magna cum laude _ ) in electrical engineering from texas a&m university in 1987 . he is a professor at the massachusetts institute of technology ( mit ) . prior to joining mit , he was at at&t research laboratories for five years and at the jet propulsion laboratory for seven years . his research encompasses fundamental theories , algorithm design , and experimentation for a broad range of real - world problems . his current research topics include network localization and navigation , network interference exploitation , intrinsic wireless secrecy , adaptive diversity techniques , and ultra - wide bandwidth systems . professor win is an elected fellow of the aaas , the ieee , and the iet , and was an ieee distinguished lecturer . he was honored with two ieee technical field awards : the ieee kiyo tomiyasu award ( 2011 ) and the ieee eric e. sumner award ( 2006 , jointly with r. a. scholtz ) . together with students and colleagues , his papers have received numerous awards including the ieee communications society s stephen o. rice prize ( 2012 ) , the ieee aerospace and electronic systems society s m. barry carlton award ( 2011 ) , the ieee communications society s guglielmo marconi prize paper award ( 2008 ) , and the ieee antennas and propagation society s sergei a. schelkunoff transactions prize paper award ( 2003 ) . highlights of his international scholarly initiatives are the copernicus fellowship ( 2011 ) , the royal academy of engineering distinguished visiting fellowship ( 2009 ) , and the fulbright fellowship ( 2004 ) . other recognitions include the laurea honoris causa from the university of ferrara ( 2008 ) , the technical recognition award of the ieee comsoc radio communications committee ( 2008 ) , and the u.s . presidential early career award for scientists and engineers ( 2004 ) . win is an elected member - at - large on the ieee communications society board of governors ( 20112013 ) . he was the chair ( 20042006 ) and secretary ( 20022004 ) for the radio communications committee of the ieee communications society . over the last decade , he has organized and chaired numerous international conferences . he is currently an editor - at - large for the ieee wireless communications letters , and serving on the editorial advisory board for the ieee transactions on wireless communications . he served as editor ( 20062012 ) for the ieee transactions on wireless communications , and served as area editor ( 20032006 ) and editor ( 19982006 ) for the ieee transactions on communications . he was guest - editor for the proceedings of the ieee ( 2009 ) and ieee journal on selected areas in communications ( 2002 ) . Abstract:
[ "establishing bounds on the accuracy achievable by localization techniques represents a fundamental technical issue . bounds on localization accuracy have been derived for cases in which the position of an agent is estimated on the basis of a set of observations and , possibly , of some a priori information related to them ( e.g. , information about anchor positions and properties of the communication channel ) . in this manuscript new bounds are derived under the assumption that the localization system is _ map - aware _ , i.e. , it can benefit not only from the availability of observations , but also from the a priori knowledge provided by the _ map _ of the environment where it operates . our results show that : a ) map - aware estimation accuracy can be related to some features of the map ( e.g. , its shape and area ) even though , in general , the relation is complicated ; b ) maps are really useful in the presence of some combination of low signal - to - noise ratios and specific geometrical features of the map ( e.g. , the size of obstructions ) ; c ) in most cases , there is no need of refined maps since additional details do not improve estimation accuracy . localization , cramer - rao bound , ziv - zikai bound , weiss - weinstein bound , a priori information , map ." ]
13,472
13,472
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: we have extended the search of @xcite for periodicities in the intensities of x - ray sources using light curves produced by the _ rossi x - ray timing explorer ( rxte ) _ all - sky monitor ( asm ) . @xcite analyzed data accumulated during the first 8.5 years of the mission and detected 41 periodicities and 5 possible periodicities or quasiperiodicities . two of the periodicities detected in their search likely represent neutron star spin and @xmath1 represent the precession of tilted accretion disks or other phenomena that produce superorbital periods . the 33 other periodicities are believed to represent evidence of the orbital motion of a close - binary star system . most of the orbital periods were associated with high - mass x - ray binaries ( hmxbs ) where the normal type star is either a supergiant or a be star . eight of the periodicities were associated with the orbital periods of low - mass x - ray binaries ( lmxbs ) , and one was associated with a cataclysmic variable ( cv ) . the search of @xcite was one of the most comprehensive searches for periodicities in the range of hours to years in the x - ray intensities of the bright galactic x - ray sources . however , relatively few new periods were found in the course of the search in spite of the conventional wisdom that nearly all of the bright galactic sources are accreting binaries with periods in the range of sensitivity of the search . the orbital periods of many galactic sources are still not determined , and so searches for evidence of these presently unknown orbital periods remain of interest . the present search improves on the sensitivity achieved in the earlier search through the analysis of light curves obtained over a longer course of time , i.e. nearly 14 years as opposed to 8.5 years , and through two major changes in the analysis techniques . we have also analyzed subintervals of the mission - long data sets . a preliminary report of the results of this work was presented in @xcite . the asm consists of three scanning shadow cameras ( sscs ) mounted on a rotating drive assembly @xcite . each ssc acts as a coded - aperture camera and comprises a position - sensitive proportional counter ( pspc ) that detects x - ray photons and provides one - dimension position information via the charge - division technique . the entrance window of each pspc has a total geometric area of about 68 @xmath2 . a mask that is perforated with a pseudorandom pattern of open slits is held 30 cm above the pspc entrance window . the mask open fraction is close to 50% . the field of view of each ssc is @xmath3 ( fwhm ) . the asm observations have almost entirely been made as series of 90-s exposures known as dwells . in each dwell the aspect of the assembly of sscs is held fixed . for each exposure , a coded - aperture analysis of the data from each ssc yields intensity estimates of the sources that are listed in a catalog ( hereafter the asm catalog ) and that fall within that ssc s field of view . the intensity estimates are derived for each of four spectral bands which nominally correspond to photon energy ranges of 1.5 - 3 , 3 - 5 , 5 - 12 , and 1.5 - 12 kev and typically achieve a sensitivity of a few ssc counts s@xmath4 ( the crab nebula produces intensities of 27 , 23 , 25 , and 75 ssc counts s@xmath4 in the 4 bands , respectively ) . any given source has been viewed in a large number , e.g. , 30,000 to 100,000 , of the 90-s exposures over the @xmath0 years of operation of the asm . each exposure generally yields intensity estimates for the four spectral bands . the present search has been carried out , except where otherwise noted , using the asm data acquired from the beginning of operations in early 1996 through 2010 january 28 ( mjd 55224 ; modified julian date = julian date @xmath5 2,400,000.5 ) . the coded - aperture analysis is applied to all asm observations . the results are sorted source - by - source , filtered , and used to construct light curve files for each of 571 potential sources for each of the four energy bands . the intensity measurements contained in these files are the input data for the present periodicity search . the instrument properties have changed over the 14 years of operation in orbit because of at least three effects . first , the gain of ssc 1 ( of sscs 1 - 3 ) increased at about 10% per year for the first 13 years or so because of a leak in the counter entrance window ( the rate of increase appears to have moderated in year 14 ) . this has resulted , first , in progressive reductions in the effective sensitivity of ssc 1 in the 5 - 12 kev band and , recently , to some extent in the 3 - 5 kev band because in the last few years the pulse heights of higher energy events are often saturated and thus unusable . the second of the effects is present because the one - dimensional position - sensing capability of the proportional counters is based on the charge - division technique and the resistivity of carbon - coated quartz - fiber anodes . the process of event detection in the counters results in the redistribution or removal of the carbon . the resistivity of each anode thus evolves over time generally becoming larger and less uniform , and so the functions that relate charge ratio to position have changed over the course of the mission . third , in the last few years there is often a high background of events that have pulse heights that suggest that they are due to the detection of al k@xmath6 photons . we do not understand in detail why this is happening but we speculate that it may be due to leakage of ultraviolet radiation through the al - coated kapton thermal shields that are immediately above the coded mask plates . uv radiation would produce photoelectrons at the counter body surfaces that happen to be , by design of the instrument , at potentials of approximately @xmath7 kv . the photoelectrons would be accelerated toward and would hit , e.g. , the aluminum collimators that are near the ground potential . some fraction of the al k@xmath6 photons that would be produced by this process would then be detected . both the gain changes and charge ratio to position calibration changes are accounted for in detail in the detector model used in our coded - aperture analysis . however , the calibrations are imperfect and the derived source intensities are therefore somewhat affected by systematic errors on both short and long time scales . the coded aperture analysis is also designed to eliminate the effects of backgrounds that are smooth and slowly - varying with regard to position in the detector ; this is largely but not entirely effective . searches for periodicities where large numbers of measurements are involved have generally proceeded by averaging the measured intensities in equally - spaced time bins , fourier transforming the resulting time series , producing a power density spectrum by taking the absolute square of the complex amplitude for each frequency , and searching for peaks in the power spectrum . our search largely follows this outline but we have implemented a few significant modifications as described below . in some searches for periodicities , a lomb - scargle periodogram ( @xcite ; see also @xcite ) is used in place of a fourier transform , but , when large numbers of measurements and time bins are being analyzed , the differences between the two are not important except at extremely low frequencies . for the present analyses , the conventional discrete fourier transform is adequate so we do not make use of the lomb - scargle variation . we employ two unusual strategies with the goal of improving the search sensitivity . the first strategy involves the use of weights such as the reciprocals of the variances in fourier and other types of analysis since the individual asm measurements have a wide range of associated uncertainties . since in the present instance the amplitudes in the fourier transforms may be regarded as statistical averages , they may be better determined by the use of appropriate weights . this is discussed briefly in @xcite and at greater length in @xcite . these two reports also discuss the use of weights which involve the intrinsic source variability , but we do not use such weights in the work reported herein . the second strategy stems from the fact that the observations of the source are obtained with a low duty cycle , i.e. , the window function is sparse but nevertheless highly structured . the properties of the window function , in combination with the presence of slow variations of the source intensity , act to hinder the detection of variations on short time scales . the window function power density spectrum ( pds ) has substantial power at high frequencies , e.g. , 1 cycle d@xmath4 and 1 cycle per spacecraft orbit ( @xmath8 minute period ) . since the data may be regarded as the product of a ( hypothetical ) continuous set of source intensity measurements with the window function , a fourier transform of the data is equivalent to the convolution of a transform of a continuous set of intensity measurements with the window function transform . the high frequency structure in the window function transform acts to spread power at low frequencies in the source intensity to high frequencies in the calculated transform ( or , equivalently , the pds ) . this effectively raises the noise level at high frequencies . thus , in most of our analyses , a smoothed version of the light curve is subtracted from the binned data prior to the fourier analysis . the details of the analysis of each asm dwell - by - dwell light curve are as follows . the time of each intensity measurement was adjusted to approximately remove the effects of the motion of the earth around the solar system barycenter and the adjusted times were used to assign the measurements to equally - spaced time bins of duration 5 minutes ( 0.0034722 d ) or more . weights are used in averaging those measurements that fall into a given time bin . the @xmath9 measurements that fall into the time bin which is labelled by the index @xmath10 are denoted with index @xmath11 that runs from 1 to @xmath9 . we denote the @xmath11th measured source intensity in a time bin by @xmath12 and its associated 1-sigma uncertainty by @xmath13 . the averaging in this stage uses weights @xmath14 where @xmath15 is a selected weighting index ( see values in table [ tbl : mthds ] ) . the weighted - average intensity in bin @xmath10 is then @xmath16 for convenience we denote the denominator of this expression by @xmath17 so that @xmath18 where it should be understood that @xmath19 for those time bins that contain no measurements . the @xmath17 s are used to weight the time bins in the subsequent analysis . lccc unwt & none & 2.0 & 0.0 + wt & none & 2.0 & 2.0 + ungs & gaussian & 2.0 & 0.0 + wtgs & gaussian & 2.0 & 2.0 + wtgs - v4 & gaussian & 2.5 & 1.5 + wtgs - v8 & gaussian & 2.0 & 3.0 + wtbx & box & 2.0 & 2.0 as stated above , a smoothed version of the light curve is , in many of our analyses , subtracted from the binned data . the smoothed version is given by a time bin by time bin ratio in which the numerator is computed by convolving a kernel function with a weighted version of the binned light curve . the denominator is computed by convolving the same kernel function with a weighted version of the window function . the value of the @xmath10th bin of the smoothed data is given by @xmath20 where @xmath21 represents the kernel function , @xmath22 and @xmath23 are the above defined functions of the time bin index @xmath10 , and `` @xmath24 '' denotes convolution . the kernel function @xmath21 may be either a gaussian or a box function . in the case of the gaussian kernel , the full width at half maximum response is taken to be equal to the smoothing time parameter . the gaussian is calculated out to @xmath25 standard deviations from its center . in the case of the box function , the box width is taken to be twice the smoothing time parameter . the convolution is accomplished using fourier transforms . we repeated the analyses using seven different values of the smoothing time parameter ( see table [ tbl : tmscls ] ) to optimize the sensitivity in each of several different frequency ranges . in each case the smoothed light curve was subtracted from the unsmoothed light curve , weights were applied , and the results were fourier transformed . in symbols , this part of the analysis produces a filtered light curve described by : @xmath26 where the weights @xmath27 are given by @xmath28^{k_b / k_a}\ ] ] and @xmath29 is a second weighting index . weight index values are given in table [ tbl : mthds ] . we also did the analysis without subtracting a smoothed version of the light curve . the unweighted average of the set of @xmath30 s which correspond to bins with nonzero exposure is computed and then subtracted from each of the @xmath30 values for those bins . the resultant array is extended with zeroes by a factor of four and fourier transformed . the extension of the array yields oversampling in the frequency domain . the oversampled transform is converted into a power density spectrum which is normalized to have an average value of unity . the normalized power spectra are compressed by saving the average and maximum values for sets of contiguous frequency bins ; the number of contiguous bins depends on the frequency range and smoothing time parameter ( see table [ tbl : tmscls ] ) . we found that for the analyses where short smoothing time scales were used , i.e. , time scales of 0.3 , 0.9 , and 3.0 days , the compressed power spectra have a non - white appearance . the effect is strongest for the shortest smoothing time scale , i.e. , 0.3 days . it is not clear how to apply a threshold for detection of a periodicity in a nonwhite spectrum . therefore we added a procedure ( to the code that performs the compression described above ) to compute a `` background '' average power around each compressed frequency bin , and to then obtain whitened maximum values . each whitened maximum value is then the ratio of a maximum value in an unwhitened compressed spectrum to the corresponding background average . the resulting whitened spectra generally appear to have little systematic structure ( see fig . [ fig : whiten ] ) . table [ tbl : mthds ] lists , at the highest level , the variations of the analysis method that we have used . we found that the results from the methods where both weighting and filtering were applied ( `` wtgs '' , `` wtgs - v4 '' , `` wtgs - v8 '' , and `` wtbx '' ) were almost always nearly equal or superior to the results obtained with the other methods ( `` unwt '' , `` wt '' , `` ungs '' ) . a typical , i.e. , not the extreme best case , of the differences is illustrated in figure [ fig : pdscalc ] . therefore we did not search for significant peaks in the power spectra obtained using the latter methods . the `` wtgs '' , `` wtgs - v4 '' , `` wtgs - v8 '' , and `` wtbx '' methods were all applied to the 1.5 - 12 kev band light curves , but the results generally produced power spectra that were quite similar in terms of both detailed appearance and sensitivity . therefore only the `` wtgs '' method was applied to the other three energy bands . the results from the four energy bands are , in some cases , quite different from each other . table [ tbl : tmscls ] lists smoothing time scales and the corresponding bin durations , parameters used for compression and whitening , and parameters used in searching for significant peaks . ccrrrcrr none & 2.0 & 1 & 300 & 3 & 0.0007 & 1.0 & 17.7 + 500.0 & 2.0 & 1 & 300 & 3 & 0.004 & 1.0 & 17.7 + 100.0 & 1.0 & 1 & 300 & 3 & 0.022 & 1.0 & 18.4 + 30.0 & 0.15 & 10 & 60 & 1 & 0.1 & 4.0 & 20.3 + 10.0 & 0.05 & 20 & 30 & 1 & 0.2 & 10.0 & 21.4 + 3.0 & 0.005 & 150 & 12 & 1 & 0.66 & 100.0 & 23.7 + 0.9 & 0.0034722222 & 300 & 6 & 1 & 2.2 & 144.0 & 24.1 + 0.3 & 0.0034722222 & 300 & 6 & 1 & 6.6 & 144.0 & 24.1 the powers in a spectrum of gaussian white noise are expected to be well characterized by an exponential probability distribution . we make the assumption that the powers in the whitened spectra computed as described above similarly follow an exponential distribution . in the present case it is not clear how to precisely compute the number of independent bins that we examined because 1 ) some of the power spectra for a given source involve the same data and differ only on account of slight variations in the analysis procedure , and 2 ) there is a significant degree of dependence among the powers in an oversampled power spectrum . although it is not fully justified on an a priori basis , we simply estimate the number of independent bins @xmath31 by the product of the number of frequency bins that would have applied if the fourier spectrum had not been oversampled , the number of energy bands analyzed ( 4 ; this neglects the non - independent bins among the four slightly different analyses of the 1.5 - 12 kev band ) , and the number of sources ( 571 ) . the neglect of the oversampling factor and the multiple similar analyses of the sum band does not appear to have led to significant underestimates of the detection thresholds , and , thus , this procedure appears to be justified . we have chosen a detection threshold @xmath32 for previously unknown periodicities to limit the expected number of false detections @xmath33 produced by statistical fluctuations ( based on the assumption that the powers are exponentially distributed ) in the power spectra calculated using a given smoothing time parameter . thus we have @xmath34 so that @xmath35 the values of @xmath32 are given in table [ tbl : tmscls ] for @xmath36 . as can be seen in figs . [ fig : whiten ] and [ fig : pdscalc ] , the window functions of the light curves often contain strong peaks at or close to particular frequencies . even though the analysis procedure tends to minimize the appearance of these frequencies in the whitened power spectra , there are occurrences of peaks at these frequencies . in the analyses done with filtering based on smoothing time scales of 10.0 days and under , we ignore all peaks in the frequency ranges @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath40 , @xmath41 , and @xmath42 d@xmath4 . for the other analyses , we ignore all peaks in the frequency ranges @xmath43 , @xmath44 , @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath47 , @xmath48 , @xmath49 , and @xmath50 d@xmath4 . a substantial fraction of the 571 potential sources are extragalactic targets such as active galactic nuclei , extended galactic targets such as supernova remnants , or x - ray binaries that have been in quiescence since the beginning of the rxte mission and for which we have no expectation of finding detectable periodicities . the power spectra of these sources act effectively as controls that show the actual statistics of the power spectra and that bring attention to periodicities that must be the product of statistical fluctuations or artifacts . indeed , the search procedure described here was tailored in part by examination of the results on the `` controls '' . furthermore , since it would be difficult to understand the reality of peaks that exceed the detection threshold in the power spectra of these sources , the effective number of sources must be less than 571 . we have not adjusted the significance thresholds downward to account for this effect . since we searched large numbers of bins , the thresholds for the detection of previously unreported periodicities given in table [ tbl : tmscls ] when a periodicity has previously been reported , it may be confirmed even if the power at or very close to the previously reported frequency is below the threshold given in the table . uncompressed power density spectra are useful for precise estimation of the frequencies of the detected periodicities . since the uncompressed spectra were not saved in the original analysis for smoothing time scales less than or equal to 30.0 days , the analyses that produced the most significant detection of each periodicity were repeated , if necessary , and the resulting uncompressed spectra were saved . for each periodicity a small frequency range around the major peak was fit with a gaussian to obtain estimates of the central frequency , its uncertainty , and the peak width . the uncertainty in the frequency may be estimated based on the result of horne and baliunas ( 1986 ) that @xmath51 where @xmath52 is the length of the time interval covered by the light curve and @xmath53 is the peak power in a normalized pds . we also use the simple estimate @xmath54 which , in most cases , should be a conservative upper limit to the uncertainty ( but , if the periodicity persisted for only a fraction of the time covered by the light curve , the uncertainty could be larger than this value ) . in the estimates of frequencies and periods that we present below , the uncertainty derived using eq . ( 8) is given first and the uncertainty derived using eq . ( 9 ) is given second in square brackets . in the present search we find clear evidence of the periodicities in gro j1008@xmath557 and ss 433 that have been previously detected in the asm data but had not been detected in the analysis reported by @xcite . @xcite reported the detection of the 9.56-day period of 4u 2206 + 543 , but did not find evidence of variation with a period of @xmath55 days . such variation was first reported by @xcite . since we now find clear evidence of variation at the @xmath55-d period , we report its detection herein . in the previous section , we noted that periodicities at previously identified frequencies can be found with better sensitivity than periodicities at undetermined frequencies . therefore we examined the power spectra for peaks at the frequencies corresponding to the periods listed in the catalogs of @xcite and @xcite and thereby identified evidence of the presence of a number of periodicities that were not found by @xcite . table [ tbl : detect ] lists the periodicities that emerge from the present search that are not listed in tables 1 - 3 of @xcite . only one of these was , when first detected in the course of this search , previously unreported on the basis of optical or other x - ray observations , namely the 18.545-day periodicity in igr j18483@xmath50311 . the photon energy band , filter time scale , and method that yielded the most significant detection are given for each detected periodicity . the estimated frequencies and associated uncertainties are listed in table [ tbl : detect ] with the exception of the very low frequencies of the sources gro j1008@xmath557 and 2s 1845@xmath5024 . the frequencies or , equivalently , periods of these latter sources are better obtained from epoch - folding analyses and even more precisely from pulse timing studies . we give in table [ tbl : ampl ] average source intensities , peak powers seen in the whitened and renormalized power spectra , and estimated average amplitudes of the detected periodic signals . the source names , photon energy bands , and periods are taken from table [ tbl : detect ] . the estimated average amplitudes of the detected periodic signals were obtained by superposing sine waves onto the measured intensities in the appropriate light curves and redoing the complete analysis using the appropriate method , time scale , and energy band . the sine wave frequencies were chosen to yield peaks in the power spectrum close to , but not on top of , the frequencies of the detected signals . the sine wave amplitudes were chosen to give peak powers close to or above , within a factor of two , the peak powers of the detected signals . the results were then interpolated to estimate the amplitudes that would give rise to the peak powers of the detected signals . the uncertainty in the amplitude for a given source was estimated by the rms dispersion in the amplitudes obtained when sine waves were injected at four to ten different frequencies . in the last column of table [ tbl : ampl ] we give the ratio of the inferred average signal amplitude ( a ) to the weighted average source intensity ( i ) . this is an indicator of the fractional variation of the source intensity at the orbital frequency . it does not include the effects of harmonics which are detected in some of the power density spectra and should , therefore , be used only as a general indicator of the degree of modulation . llcccccc 2s0921@xmath5630 & x0921@xmath5630 & 1.5 - 12 & 30.0 & wtbx & 0.110994 ( 13 ; 100 ) & 216.23 ( 3 ; 19 ) h & 52738.13 ( 13 ) + 4u1254@xmath569 & x1254@xmath5690 & 1.5 - 12 & 3.0 & wtgs - v4 & 6.101690 ( 15 ; 100 ) & 3.933337 ( 10 ; 64 ) h & 52733.0546 ( 31 ) + 4u1323@xmath562 & x1323@xmath5619 & 1.5 - 12 & 3.0 & wtgs & 8.157930 ( 15 ; 100 ) & 2.941923 ( 5 ; 36 ) h & 52733.2395 ( 18 ) + 4u1636@xmath5536 & x1636@xmath5536 & 1.5 - 12 & 0.9 & wtgs & 6.327232 ( 14 ; 100 ) & 3.793128 ( 8 ; 60 ) h & 52733.0343 ( 18 ) + 4u1728@xmath516 & gx9 + 9 & 1.5 - 12 & 0.9 & wtgs & 5.723207 ( 7 ; 100 ) & 4.193453 ( 5 ; 73 ) h & 52733.152 ( 1 ) + 4u1746@xmath537 & x1746@xmath5370 & 1.5 - 12 & 3.0 & wtgs - v8 & 4.648202 ( 15 ; 100 ) & 5.163287 ( 18 ; 111 ) h & 52733.156 ( 3 ) + grs1758@xmath5258 & grs1758@xmath5258 & 3 - 5 & 500.0 & wtgs & 0.052706 ( 19;100 ) & 18.973 ( 7 ; 36 ) d & 52748.27 ( 23 ) + 4u1820@xmath530 & x1820@xmath5303 & 1.5 - 12 & 0.9 & wtgs & 126.129380 ( 13 ; 100 ) & 0.19028081 ( 2 ; 15 ) h & 52733.00590 ( 7 ) + a0535 + 26 & x0535 + 26 & 1.5 - 12 & 500.0 & wtgs & 0.00906 & 110.4 & 52852.59 ( 27 ) + lmc x-1 & lmcx1 & 1.5 - 12 & 100.0 & wtbx & 0.255821 ( 14 ; 100 ) & 3.90898 ( 21 ; 153 ) d & 52733.952 ( 45 ) + groj1008@xmath557 & groj1008@xmath557 & 3 - 5 & 500.0 & wtgs & & & + 2s1417@xmath562 & x1417@xmath5624 & 5 - 12 & 100.0 & wtgs & 0.023611 ( 45 ; 100 ) & 42.35 ( 8 ; 18 ) d & 52770.04 ( 91 ) + igrj16320@xmath54751 & igrj16320@xmath54751 & 5 - 12 & 100.0 & wtgs & 0.111234 ( 11 ; 100 ) & 8.9901 ( 9 ; 81 ) d & 52742.79 ( 12 ) + igrj16418@xmath54532 & igrj16418@xmath54532 & 5 - 12 & 30.0 & wtgs & 0.267461 ( 20 ; 100 ) & 3.73886 ( 28 ; 140 ) d & 52735.84 ( 7 ) + exo1722@xmath5363 & exo1722@xmath5363 & 5 - 12 & 30.0 & wtgs & 0.102655 ( 19 ; 100 ) & 9.7414 ( 18 ; 95 ) d & 52738.25 ( 19 ) + igrj18027@xmath52016 & igrj18027@xmath52017 & 5 - 12 & 30.0 & wtgs & 0.218881 ( 16;100 ) & 4.5687 ( 3;21 ) & 52736.36 ( 42 ) + 2s1845@xmath5024 & x1845@xmath5024 & 5 - 12 & 500.0 & wtgs & & & + igrj18483@xmath50311 & igrj18483@xmath50311 & 5 - 12 & 100.0 & wtgs & 0.053923 ( 9 ; 100 ) & 18.545 ( 3 ; 34 ) d & 52754.37 ( 10 ) + 3a1909 + 048 & ss433 & 5 - 12 & 100.0 & wtgs & 0.076452 ( 20 ; 100 ) & 13.080 ( 3 ; 17 ) d & 52745.19 ( 18 ) + 4u2206 + 543 & x2206 + 543 & 1.5 - 12 & 100.0 & wtbx & 0.104620 ( 13 ; 100 ) & 9.5584 ( 12 ; 91 ) d & 52740.97 ( 6 ) + lccccccc 2s0921@xmath5630 & 1.5 - 12 & 0.239(4 ) & 0.084(6 ) & 216.2 h & 23 & 0.052 & 0.22 + 4u1254@xmath569 & 1.5 - 12 & 2.455(4 ) & 2.291(6 ) & 3.933 h & 22 & 0.052 & 0.021 + 4u1323@xmath562 & 1.5 - 12 & 0.575(4 ) & 0.449(6 ) & 2.942 h & 27 & 0.055 & 0.096 + 4u1636@xmath5536 & 1.5 - 12 & 9.069(6 ) & 9.339(9 ) & 3.793 h & 22 & 0.087 & 0.0096 + 4u1728@xmath516 ( gx9 + 9 ) & 1.5 - 12 & 18.879(8 ) & 19.01(1 ) & 4.193 h & 123 & 0.283 & 0.015 + 4u1746@xmath537 & 1.5 - 12 & 2.275(6 ) & 2.06(1 ) & 5.163 h & 30 & 0.094 & 0.041 + grs1758@xmath5258 & 3 - 5 & 0.485(5 ) & 0.391(7 ) & 18.97 d & 13 & 0.054 & 0.11 + 4u1820@xmath530 & 1.5 - 12 & 20.347(8 ) & 20.63(1 ) & 0.1903 h & 30 & 0.12 & 0.0059 + a0535 + 26 & 1.5 - 12 & 0.275(4 ) & 0.550(6 ) & 110.4 & 11 & 0.21 & 0.78 + lmc x-1 & 1.5 - 12 & 1.524(4 ) & 1.369(5 ) & 3.909 d & 29 & 0.064 & 0.042 + groj1008@xmath557 & 3 - 5 & 0.036(2 ) & 0.006(3 ) & & 10 & & + 2s1417@xmath562 & 5 - 12 & 0.096(3 ) & 0.035(6 ) & 42.4 d & 12 & 0.035 & 0.36 + igrj16320@xmath54751 & 5 - 12 & 0.224(4 ) & 0.119(7 ) & 8.99 d & 34 & 0.063 & 0.28 + igrj16418@xmath54532 & 5 - 12 & 0.165(5 ) & 0.060(9 ) & 3.739 d & 17 & 0.047 & 0.28 + exo1722@xmath5363 & 5 - 12 & 0.132(4 ) & 0.029(7 ) & 9.741 d & 19 & 0.051 & 0.39 + igrj18027@xmath52016 & 5 - 12 & 0.189(7 ) & 0.03(1 ) & 4.569 d & 16 & 0.069 & 0.37 + 2s1845@xmath5024 & 5 - 12 & 0.069(3 ) & -0.065(7 ) & & 5 & + igrj18483@xmath50311 & 5 - 12 & 0.115(3 ) & -0.021(7 ) & 18.54 d & 60 & 0.099 & 0.86 + 3a1909 + 048 ( ss433 ) & 5 - 12 & 0.256(3 ) & 0.189(6 ) & 13.08 d & 20 & 0.037 & 0.14 + 4u2206 + 543 & 1.5 - 12 & 0.376(3 ) & 0.252(5 ) & 9.558 d & 17 & 0.08 & 0.21 + the asm light curves of the sources for which we report detections of periodicities in table [ tbl : detect ] were folded at periods close to , i.e. , within a small fraction of the quoted 1@xmath56 errors , those listed in that table . weights were used in averaging the intensities in each phase bin . a smoothed version of the light curve was subtracted from each light curve before it was folded . the time scales used for the smoothing are listed in table [ tbl : detect ] . after the folding was accomplished , the overall average intensity was then added to the folded light curve to show the proper mean ( the mean was removed when the smoothed version was subtracted from the light curve ) . the folded light curves are shown in figures [ fig : fold1 ] and [ fig : fold2 ] . the uncertainties shown in the plots of the folded light curves were determined from propagation of the 1@xmath56 uncertainties associated with each measurement in a light curve assuming the measurements are statistically independent . this neglects the effects of random source variability in at least two respects . first , the effects of source variability are not included in the formal uncertainties of the individual measurements . second , when variability is present it almost always involves correlations from measurement to measurement . the epochs of phase zero used in plotting the folded light curves are listed in table [ tbl : detect ] . these epochs were determined by fitting each folded 1.5 - 12 kev band light curve with a combination of constant , sine , and cosine functions of phase . the epoch is then obtained from the phase of minimum or maximum intensity of the fitted function . actual minima or maxima may deviate somewhat from these epochs ; the differences may be seen in the folded light curves . in this section we briefly discuss our results for each of the periodicities of the lmxbs listed in table [ tbl : detect ] . the results in table [ tbl : detect ] show that , with only one exception , the most significant detections of these systems were made in the overall 1.5 - 12 kev energy band . * 2s0921@xmath5630 * is a weak x - ray source in a low - mass system with a relatively long orbital period . photometry of the bright optical counterpart by @xcite and @xcite suggested that the observed variability could be periodic , but did not yield correct estimates of the actual period . x - ray observations with the _ exosat _ satellite showed intensity changes , interpreted as partial eclipses , that were key to obtaining the first relatively precise period estimate @xcite . recent optical observations have also yielded relatively precise estimates of the orbital period ; @xcite obtained @xmath57 d and @xcite obtained @xmath58 d. the orbital period is detected in the present study ; this is shown in the power spectrum plotted in fig . [ fig : pds0921 ] . we derive an estimate of the orbital period of @xmath59 $ ] d ( see table [ tbl : detect ] ) that is consistent with these recently reported values . @xcite and @xcite report further work on the binary parameters including the component masses . the folded asm light curves show that the periodic modulation has an amplitude of @xmath6030% relative to the average source strength . however , the average source intensity could be affected by systematic errors in the baseline level of order 0.1 ssc counts s@xmath4 ( 1.5 - 12 kev band ) . nonetheless , the modulation fraction must be rather large , and the periodicity may be easily detectable by other instruments . 630 . the `` wtbx '' method and a 30.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds0921],height=336 ] * 4u1254@xmath569 * is a so - called dipping lmxb . its @xmath61 hr orbital period was revealed in both x - ray and optical observations @xcite . @xcite report the results of recent observations of this source with the _ xmm - newton _ and _ integral _ satellites . they also discuss the detection of the 3.9-hr periodicity in asm data , present a folded light curve , and use the asm data to obtain an estimate of the orbital period of @xmath62 d ( @xmath63 h ) . we also detect the orbital period in the asm light curves ( see fig . [ fig : pds1254 ] ) and derive a value for the period of @xmath64 $ ] h ( see table [ tbl : detect ] ) . this value is close to that of @xcite but our estimate of the uncertainty is larger . we do not believe that the asm data alone warrant a more precise estimate of the orbital period than we have given . the `` wtgs - v4 '' method and a 3.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds1254],height=336 ] * 4u1323@xmath562 * is also a dipping lmxb . @xcite report on _ exosat _ x - ray observations wherein the orbital period of the binary system was manifest in terms of intensity dips that recurred with a period of @xmath65 h. later , @xcite derived a period of @xmath66 h from x - ray observations with _ bepposax_. even though the source is rather weak , the orbital period is easily detected in the asm light curves ( see fig . [ fig : pds1323 ] ) . we derive a value for the period of @xmath67 $ ] h ( see table [ tbl : detect ] ) . it is interesting to compare this value with the conclusion of @xcite that consideration of the times of dips in two observations separated by one year imply that the period must be more precisely given by @xmath68 h. the ambiguity in this formula reflects an ambiguity in the number of orbital cycles in the one year interval between the observations . the present determination of the orbital period implies @xmath69 and that @xmath70 h where the uncertainty is dominated by the uncertainty of the correction for @xmath69 . given that the difference between this period and the asm - derived value is only @xmath71 h and considering the uncertainties in the two measurements , we conclude that the two values are mutually consistent . recent studies of this source may be found in @xcite and @xcite . the `` wtgs '' method and a 3.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds1323],height=336 ] * 4u1636@xmath5536 * is a persistent lmxb that often displays type i x - ray bursts . the orbital period was found through optical photometry @xcite . it is also evident through radial velocity measurements made from emission line profiles obtained in optical spectroscopic observations ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? estimates of the orbital period have been successively improved by @xcite since the discovery by @xcite . to our knowledge , the best optical ephemeris is that of @xcite , who estimate that the period is @xmath72 h. the asm detection ( see figure [ fig : pds1636 ] ) is secure , given knowledge of the optical period , but would not be sufficiently strong to have been detected in our blind search . it is , nonetheless , the first detection of the orbital period in x - rays . the period estimated from the asm results is @xmath73 $ ] h ( table [ tbl : detect ] ) . this value is consistent with that of @xcite though it is somewhat less precise . the `` wtgs '' method and a 0.9 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds1636],height=336 ] * 4u1728@xmath516 ( gx9 + 9 ) * is a rather bright persistent lmxb . the orbital periodicity at the period of @xmath74 hours was found in _ heao1 _ a-1 x - ray data by @xcite . soon afterwards , @xcite found variations at essentially the same period in the brightness of the optical counterpart . the asm detection and an account of the variability in the asm data of the modulation amplitude is described in full by @xcite . the periodicity is manifest with even greater significance in the longer data set used in our most recent analyses ; compare fig . [ fig : pdsgx9p9 ] with fig . 2 of @xcite . in table [ tbl : detect ] we also give an updated estimate of the orbital period that is only slightly different from that given by @xcite . , height=336 ] * 4u1746@xmath537 * is an lmxb in the globular cluster ngc 6441 . x - ray observations carried out with _ exosat _ , _ ginga _ , and _ rxte_/pca showed the presence of dips that occur roughly every 5 hours and quickly led to the interpretation that their recurrence period is the orbital period @xcite . the current best estimate of the orbital period , @xmath75 h , was given by @xcite . this periodicity is seen with high significance in the asm data ( see fig . [ fig : pds1746 ] ) . we obtain the period estimate @xmath76 $ ] h that is consistent with the results of @xcite but is substantially more precise . the `` wtgs - v8 '' method and a 3.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds1746],height=336 ] * grs1758@xmath5258 * most likely comprises a black hole accreting from a k - type giant star ( * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . @xcite found a periodicity with @xmath77 days in the data obtained in extensive _ rxte _ pca observations done in the years 1997 through 2000 and interpreted the period as the orbital period . @xcite performed near - ir observations and identified an early k - type star as the likely companion if the orbital period is as long as 18.45 days . we find a peak in the asm power spectrum shown in figure [ fig : pds1758 ] that corresponds to a period of @xmath78 $ ] days and that we therefore identify with the orbital period . the `` wtgs '' method and a 500.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds1758],height=336 ] * 4u1820@xmath530 * is a very bright lmxb in the globular cluster ngc 6624 . @xcite analyzed data from x - ray observations with _ exosat _ and discovered the 11 minute orbital period . the periodicity is only evident as a 3% or less peak - to - peak modulation in the overall x - ray intensity . @xcite used measurements made by a number of x - ray satellites of the times of maxima of the 11-m variation to obtain an ephemeris wherein both linear and quadratic terms are significant . to our knowledge , this is the most precise ephemeris in the literature at this time . we detect the periodicity in the asm light curve with high significance ; see fig . [ fig : pds1820 ] and table [ tbl : detect ] . the period we obtain , @xmath79 $ ] s , is an average over the duration of the asm data set and effectively applies near the mid - time of this interval , i.e. , near mjd 52620 . we can compare our period measurement with the period of @xmath80 s predicted for this epoch by the @xcite ephemeris . if we assume that the smaller of the two uncertainties in the asm period that are given in table [ tbl : detect ] is applicable , then the asm period is about 4 standard deviations below the prediction of the @xcite ephemeris . this suggests that the coefficient of the quadratic term in that ephemeris should be more negative . however , we have not undertaken a proper joint analysis of all of the timing results and so this conclusion must be regarded as tentative . the `` wtgs '' method and a 0.9 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds1820],height=336 ] the orbital periods of a number of hmxbs are listed in table [ tbl : detect ] . in contrast with the results on lmxbs , table [ tbl : detect ] shows that the majority of the most significant detections of these systems were made in the 5 - 12 kev energy band . this is in accordance with expectations based on the observation that many of the accreting compact objects in hmxbs are x - ray pulsars that tend to have relatively hard x - ray spectra . * a0535 + 26 * is a be / x - ray pulsar that can be rather bright in x - rays during transient outbursts . the early observations are reviewed by @xcite . pulse timing analyses of observations obtained with the batse instrument were used to determine that the orbital period is @xmath81 days ( * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . a portion of an asm power density spectrum is shown in figure [ fig : pdsj1008 ] . this figure demonstrates that the periodicity is apparent , but is not detected with sufficient significance to allow us to obtain a useful improvement in the precision of the orbital period . seven separate peaks in the intensity of this source are apparent in the latter part of the asm light curve . their average separation is close to 114 days and is probably not consistent with the period determined through pulse timing . the outbursts of some other be star / neutron star binaries do not occur at precisely the orbital periods determined by pulse timing , so there is no reason in this case to doubt the accuracy of the pulse timing value . * lmc x-1 * is a luminous hmxb in the large magellanic cloud which highly likely comprises a stellar - mass black hole and its normal ob - type companion . the properties of the system are described in detail by @xcite . @xcite also present the asm results and how they relate to other observations including other period determinations . @xcite adopt the value of @xmath82 days as their best estimate of the period based on optical photometry and spectroscopy . an updated asm power spectrum is shown in figure [ fig : pdslmcx1 ] and revised estimates , based solely on the asm power spectrum , of the orbital frequency and period are given in table [ tbl : detect ] . we note that the asm detection provides the only reported evidence to date of the orbital period in x - rays and that our x - ray - based period estimate of @xmath83 $ ] days is fully consistent with the optically - based value of @xcite . , height=336 ] * groj1008@xmath557 * is a transient x - ray pulsar in a be / x - ray binary discovered with the batse experiment on the _ compton gamma - ray observatory _ ( see references in * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? @xcite used @xmath84 years of asm data to obtain an early estimate of the outburst period of @xmath85 d. @xcite reported a relatively precise determination of the outburst period , @xmath86 d , that was based on the time intervals between widely spaced outbursts . we believe this is still the best current estimate of the outburst cycle time . the asm power spectrum is shown in the top panel of figure [ fig : pdsj1008 ] . though the peaks due to the outburst periodicity are clear , they are not sufficiently well - defined to yield a superior period estimate . @xcite have estimated the orbital period through timing of the 93-s pulsations seen in the batse data . they obtained the result @xmath87 d and noted that is it is in good agreement with the result of @xcite . the `` ringing '' appearance derives from a light curve where a small number of strong outbursts punctuate the otherwise low source strength . ( middle ) power density spectrum made from the 3 - 5 kev light curve of groj1008@xmath557 . ( bottom ) power density spectrum made from the 5 - 12 kev light curve of 2s1845@xmath5024 . the previously determined orbital frequencies are 0.009066(25 ) d@xmath4 ( a0535@xmath88262 ) , 0.004018(8 ) d@xmath4 ( groj1008@xmath557 ) , and 0.0041292(2 ) d@xmath4 ( 2s1845@xmath5024 ) . [ fig : pdsj1008],height=336 ] * 2s1417@xmath562 * is also a transient pulsar in a be / x - ray binary system . a brief description of the early history and of a pulse - timing analysis using batse data may be found in @xcite . the batse timing analysis yielded an estimate of the orbital period of @xmath89 d as well as the projected semimajor axis , eccentricity , epoch of periastron passage , and other orbital elements . a slight revision to the orbital period and time of periastron passage have been given by @xcite . evidence of outbursts recurring at intervals that are close in duration to the orbital period ( or multiples thereof ) is seen in the asm power spectrum ( see fig . [ fig : pds1417 ] ) . frequency and period estimates obtained from the spectrum shown in fig . [ fig : pds1417 ] are listed in table [ tbl : detect ] but are not as precise as the pulse - timing values . 62 . the `` wtgs '' method and a 100.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . the orbital frequency determined through pulse timing is 0.02374 ( 2 ) d@xmath4 ( see text ) . [ fig : pds1417],height=336 ] * igrj16320@xmath54751 * is an x - ray pulsar with the rather long pulse period of @xmath90 s @xcite . @xcite found the @xmath91 day orbital period by analyzing a _ swift _ burst alert telescope 14 - 200 kev light curve , and determined the epoch of maximum flux to be mjd @xmath92 . @xcite used observations with _ integral _ to measure the period , obtaining @xmath93 d. the orbital period is seen at a high level of significance in the asm power spectrum shown in figure [ fig : pds1632 ] . we use the asm power spectrum to estimate that the period is @xmath94 $ ] d. 4751 . the `` wtgs '' method and a 100.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds1632],height=336 ] * igrj16418@xmath54532 * is an x - ray source in the galactic plane that was discovered using _ integral _ @xcite . @xcite found and measured the orbital period using both _ swift_/bat and asm data and obtained the values @xmath95 days and @xmath96 days , respectively . our current asm power spectrum ( fig . [ fig : pds1641 ] ) shows a peak that is moderately significant given prior knowledge of the period . the frequency of this peak corresponds to the period @xmath97 $ ] days . this period is essentially identical to that determined earlier from the asm data by @xcite . the `` wtgs '' method and a 30.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds1641],height=336 ] * exo1722@xmath5363 * is an x - ray pulsar in a high - mass binary system seen edge - on ( * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . eclipses were found in x - ray observations made in scans of the galactic plane with the _ rxte _ pca and their temporal spacing was used to get the first real measurement of the orbital period , i.e. , @xmath98 days @xcite . @xcite have estimated the orbital parameters through a pulse timing analysis and obtain a value for the period of @xmath99 days . one might expect a strong signal from an eclipsing system but the source intensity is rather modest , about 4 mcrab ( 1.5 - 12 kev ) on average in the asm observations . thus only a modest peak is evident close to the frequency in the asm power spectrum ( see figure [ fig : pds1722 ] ) . we estimate the period to be @xmath100 $ ] days . this is consistent with but somewhat less precise than the pulse - timing - based estimate of @xcite . @xcite have recently reported estimates of the masses of the two components of the binary system and confirm that it is indeed an hmxb . the `` wtgs '' method and a 30.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds1722],height=336 ] * saxj1802.7@xmath52017 * = * igrj18027@xmath52016 * is only @xmath101 away from the bright x - ray source gx9 + 1 . it was discovered using _ bepposax _ and , despite its proximity to a much brighter source , was found to be an x - ray pulsar in a high - mass x - ray binary system @xcite . changes in the apparent pulse period led @xcite to infer that the pulsar is in an orbit with a period of @xmath102 days . @xcite realized that the _ integral _ source igrj18027@xmath52016 is associated with the sax source and refined the orbital period to be @xmath103 days . @xcite used _ swift_-bat , _ integral_-isgri , and _ rxte_-asm data to estimate that the orbital period is @xmath104 days . this periodicity is apparent in our asm power spectra ( see fig . [ fig : pds18027 ] ) . we use the present results to estimate @xmath105 $ ] days . the `` wtgs '' method and a 30.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds18027],height=336 ] * 2s1845@xmath5024 * = * gs1843@xmath502 * is an accreting pulsar that is evident during widely spaced outbursts ( * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . a fairly precise value for the orbital period of @xmath106 days was determined by @xcite by a pulse - timing analysis of batse data . a small number , @xmath107 , of outbursts are evident in the mission - long asm light curve and the outburst periodicity is weakly evident in the asm power spectrum ( see the lower panel of figure [ fig : pdsj1008 ] ) . however , the asm results do not support a determination of an orbital period that can approach the precision of the pulse - timing - based value determined by @xcite . hence , we do not present an asm - based estimate of the period . * igrj18483@xmath50311 * was discovered in _ integral_/ibis observations of the galactic center region @xcite . the orbital period was independently found around the same time by @xcite in the asm light curve and by @xcite in the _ integral _ light curve . the reported values for the period were @xmath108 days and @xmath109 days , respectively . @xcite have recently analyzed _ swift_/bat and asm data and estimate the period to be @xmath110 days . the period is detected with high significance in the present study ( see figure [ fig : pds1848 ] ) . we use that power spectrum to estimate that the orbital period is @xmath111 $ ] days . the `` wtgs '' method and a 100.0 day smoothing time scale were employed in producing the pds . ( bottom ) a small region of the corresponding uncompressed pds . [ fig : pds1848],height=336 ] * 3a1909 + 048 * is the x - ray counterpart to the well - known object * ss433*. this object most likely consists of a stellar - mass black hole that is accreting at super - eddington rates from a strong wind emitted by a high - mass normal - type star , and produces jets wherein the outflow velocity is approximately @xmath112 . an early review may be found in @xcite and a more recent one in @xcite . the precession of the jets with a period of @xmath113 days is not only evident in the moving optical lines , but also in other phenomena including the apparent x - ray intensity ( see * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? a number of reports discuss the evidence from optical spectroscopy for doppler shifts of the compact and normal components and their interpretation in terms of orbital parameters and component masses ( see , e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? @xcite reported a precise measurement of the orbital period of the binary , i.e. , @xmath114 days , on the basis of the times of eclipse - like dips in the optical flux . the x - ray intensity also shows eclipse - like dips ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) but these have not yet been exploited for orbital period estimation . @xcite reported the first evidence of the orbital period in the asm x - ray intensity measurements . very recently , @xcite obtained a new time of minimum optical brightness and used it , together with the earlier observations , to obtain a revised value of the period , @xmath115 d. in the present analysis , we find unambiguous evidence of both the precession and the orbital periods in the power spectrum ( see figure [ fig : pds433 ] ) . our estimate of the orbital period is @xmath116 $ ] days . this value is consistent with , but somewhat less precise than , those of @xcite and @xcite . if we fold the asm light curve with the period and epoch of @xcite , we find that the time of x - ray minimum is coincident with the time of optical minimum . the shape of the folded asm light curve is similar to the eclipse - like shapes seen by _ integral _ ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) and suggests that the eclipse - like decrease in the flux is the result of periodically occurring partial occultations of the x - ray emitting regions , broadly construed to include regions where the x - ray flux may be scattered ( see fig . [ fig : fold2 ] ) . , height=336 ] * 4u2206 + 543 * is a high - mass x - ray binary which manifests a distinct variation at a period of @xmath117 days in the asm light curve @xcite . this source is included in this report even though the @xmath118-day period was reported by @xcite because the underlying period may actually be twice as long , or @xmath119 days ( @xcite ; see also @xcite ) . in this regard , @xcite found a signal at a period of @xmath120 days in _ swift_/bat data and a signal near the same period in asm data . @xcite found a peak near a period @xmath121 days in the asm data . our power spectrum of asm data also shows peaks at frequencies corresponding to both periods ( see figure [ fig : pds2206 ] ) . the more significant peak corresponds to a period of @xmath122 $ ] days . assuming that the subharmonic corresponds to a period twice this value , we obtain @xmath123 $ ] days . radial velocity measurements from optical or near ir spectroscopy are needed to unambiguously determine the true orbital period . , height=336 ] lcccccc crab nebula & 1.5 - 12 & 75.50(1 ) & & 3.0 & 0.12 & 0.0016 + scox-1 & 1.5 - 12 & 867.81(6 ) & 0.789 d & 3.0 & 7.2 & 0.0082 + scox-1 & 1.5 - 12 & 867.81(6 ) & 0.789 d & 10.0 & 8.5 & 0.0099 + gx340@xmath880 & 1.5 - 12 & 28.657(8 ) & & 3.0 & 0.36 & 0.013 + groj1655@xmath540 & 1.5 - 12 & 5.311(7 ) & 2.62 d & 30.0 & 0.30 & 0.056 + gx339@xmath54 & 1.5 - 12 & 4.337(6 ) & 1.75 d & 10.0 & 0.083 & 0.019 + 4u1735@xmath5444 & 1.5 - 12 & 12.739(7 ) & 4.65 h & 3.0 & 0.11 & 0.0089 + gx5@xmath51 & 1.5 - 12 & 69.30(1 ) & & 3.0 & 0.75 & 0.011 + v4641 sgr & 1.5 - 12 & 0.458(9 ) & 2.80 d & 30.0 & 0.13 & 0.28 + 4u1957 + 115 & 1.5 - 12 & 2.366(4 ) & 9.33 h & 3.0 & 0.040 & 0.017 + the estimates of the amplitudes of the periodic signals that are reported in table [ tbl : ampl ] fall , for most of the cases , just below the detection thresholds of the present blind search . they thereby illustrate the typical sensitivity of the present search . we have also estimated the amplitudes that approximately correspond to our detection thresholds in a set of additional sources chosen either to help cover a wide range of intensities or because they are of interest for other reasons . to accomplish this we have computationally superimposed sine waves onto the asm light curves and repeated the search analyses on the light curves for those particular sources in order to determine the signal amplitudes that would have resulted in peaks reaching renormalized whitened powers of @xmath124 in the power density spectra . these estimates , which may be taken as upper limits since we would have recognized peaks near these frequencies that reached powers as small as 15 , are listed in table [ tbl : uplim ] . this table also lists previously reported periods for some of the sources as well as mission - average intensities . column 7 of the table gives the effective upper limits on the amplitudes as fractions of the average source intensities . @xcite reported modest significance detections of periodicities in asm power density spectra for gro j1655@xmath540 , gx339@xmath54 , v4641 sgr , and 4u1957 + 115 at or very close to the periods previously reported in the literature . in the analyses using the entire asm light curves that we have done recently we do not confirm these possible detections . results of sensitivity analyses for these sources are included in table [ tbl : uplim ] . table [ tbl : uplim ] also includes entries for two bright sources , sco x-1 and 4u1735@xmath5444 , with well - established periodicities that we do not detect as well as entries for three sources , i.e. , the crab nebula , gx340 + 0 , and gx5@xmath51 , that do not have known orbital periodicities . table [ tbl : uplim ] gives upper limits , calculated as described above , on any modulation near the reported periods . we note that for sco x-1 the noise is dominated by the intrinsic source variations . in rare cases , such as that described by @xcite , specialized techniques may be available to partially mitigate the effects of the intrinsic variation and improve the sensitivity of a periodicity search . we have not tried to apply any such techniques in the present general search . the upper limits on periodicities in the power spectra for the crab , gx340 + 0 , and gx5@xmath51 are included in this table to illustrate the typical sensitivity of the present search in the cases of bright sources . we also did not detect the alias of the 290-s pulse period in x1145@xmath5619 that was reported in @xcite . this is not so unexpected since pulse periods tend to change more rapidly than orbital periods and could change to a degree that makes them significantly noncoherent and therefore hard to detect in a 14-yr data set . in short , tables [ tbl : ampl ] and [ tbl : uplim ] show that the search sensitivity depends on a number of factors including source strength , degree of intrinsic source variability , and quality of the asm light curve ( which , in turn depends on the source location relative to nearby bright sources , etc . ) . the present search for periodicities in the asm light curves has proved to be more sensitive than the earlier search done by @xcite . the weighting and filtering aspects of our search algorithms have proved to be major factors in the sensitivity improvements . another major factor is the use of light curves that cover @xmath605 more years . the result is the detection of the orbital periods in 8 lmxbs and in @xmath6012 hmxbs that were not detected by @xcite . our detection of the 18.55-d period of igrj18483@xmath50311 represents the co - discovery with @xcite of the orbital period of this system . our detections of the orbital periods of 4u1636@xmath5536 and lmc x-1 are the first for these systems , to our knowledge , that have been accomplished on the basis of x - ray observations . it is interesting to compare the present list of detections together with those of @xcite with tables 1.1 and 1.3 of @xcite that list the well - established orbital periods of lmxbs and hmxbs as of 1994 or 1995 . table 1.1 of @xcite lists 32 lmxbs with known orbital periods . of these , seven have been in quiescence through the entire rxte mission and one ( cal 87 ) is a supersoft source that emits at energies below the asm band ; these systems would not be expected to yield periodicity detections in asm data . the periodicities of 17 of the remaining 24 systems have now been detected in the asm light curves if we include sco x-1 per the results of @xcite even though its orbital period was not detected in the present study . seven systems that are detected by the asm by virtue of their intensities do not yield period detections in the present search . the asm periodicity searches have yielded clear detections of the orbital periods of 13 of the 16 systems listed in table 1.1 of @xcite that had , at that time , shown evidence of the orbital period in x - rays ( see column 5 therein ) . two of the remaining three systems have been in quiescence throughout the rxte mission . the last remaining system is cyg x-2 for which we find no evidence of the 9.8-d period even though it is rather bright in x - rays . table 1.3 of @xcite lists 24 hmxbs with known orbital periods . of these , only one ( x0535@xmath5668 ) has been in quiescence during the entire rxte mission . the orbital periodicities of 16 of the remaining 23 systems have been clearly detected in power density spectra of the asm light curves ; we do not count x0535 + 262 as a clear detection in the power spectrum . the periods of four of the systems ( x0115 + 634 , x0535 + 262 , gx304@xmath51 , and x1145@xmath5619 ) are apparent in the asm light curves as limited sequences of short transient outbursts that are separated by the orbital period or small multiples thereof . the hmxbs x1553 - 542 and x0331 + 530 are evident in the asm light curves during short transient outbursts , but the asm yields no evidence of their orbital periods . we also find no evidence of the 1.7-d period of lmc x-3 even though it detectable over most of the 14-year time of the rxte mission . not unexpectedly , we find that the amplitudes of the variations at the orbital period , when expressed as fractions of the average intensity , are typically low for lmxbs and high for hmxbs ( see tables [ tbl : ampl ] and [ tbl : uplim ] ) . this is consistent with the relatively low rate of detections of orbital modulation in lmxbs and the high rate in hmxbs . there are some exceptions such as the high fractional modulation of the weak lmxb 2s0921@xmath5630 and the low degree of modulation of the hmxbs lmc x-1 and lmc x-3 . our results for 2s0921@xmath5630 suggest that there could be other weak lmxbs with fractional amplitudes that are not particularly low and that would not be difficult to detect with an instrument somewhat more sensitive than the asm . indeed , it is likely that the maxi instrument on the international space station @xcite will produce light curves useful for extending the search for periodicities in x - ray light curves and will be able to find many additional periodicities and orbital periods . we gratefully acknowledge the efforts of the rxte / asm science teams at mit and nasa / gsfc , and the rxte mission support groups at gsfc . we thank alex camacho for computing the upper limits presented in table [ tbl : uplim ] . we acknowledge the support of nasa through contract nas 5 - 30612 ( mit ) . Abstract:
[ "we present the results of a systematic search in @xmath0 years of _ rossi x - ray timing explorer _ all - sky monitor data for evidence of periodicities not reported by wen et al . ( 2006 ) . two variations of the commonly used fourier analysis search method have been employed to achieve significant improvements in sensitivity . the use of these methods and the accumulation of additional data have resulted in the detection of the signatures of the orbital periods of eight low - mass x - ray binary systems and of ten high - mass x - ray binaries not listed in the tables of wen et al ." ]
12,083
12,083
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: a tendency towards spin and charge ordering in cuprates has been observed in results of several neutron scattering experiments . low frequency spin fluctuations observed by many groups at incommensurate wave vectors as relatively sharp peeks in the magnetic structure factor @xcite have been interpreted as being due to stripe fluctuations @xcite . anisotropy observed in resistivity @xcite also points at stripe formation . stripe order appears to have an impact on phonon mediated heat transport @xcite . measurements performed by means of nmr and nqr techniques demonstrate the emergence of slow spin fluctuations whose appearance is correlated with pinning of charge - modulations @xcite . the distribution of nearest neighbor bond lengths deduced from neutron powder diffraction data @xcite and measured by means of extended x - ray - absorption fine structure spectroscopy @xcite agrees with expectations based on a scenario of lattice response to local charge - stripe order . an indication of stripe order may by also found by analyzing the shape of arpes spectra and their evolution with doping . for example , it is natural to expect the fermi surface to be flat in the stripe phase in the anti - nodal region , near the vectors @xmath2 and @xmath3 @xcite . in addition , quasi - one - dimensionality of the system should bring about the depletion of spectral weight in the nodal regions , near the brillouin zone diagonals . much research has been done to check if these hypotheses are true @xcite . it seems that some general structure of spectra may be definitely attributed to an underlying quasi - one dimensional electronic structure @xcite . in this paper we will concentrate on doped @xmath4 ( lsco ) compounds , slightly above the doping level @xmath5 at which , it is believed , a tendency towards nanoscale phase separation seems to be evident in the the arpes results @xcite . in arpes intensity maps obtained by integrating over 30 @xmath6 at the fermi energy the spectra from 15% doped @xmath7 ( nd - lsco ) @xcite , patches with high intensity may be seen in anti - nodal regions . appreciable spectral weight is also detected at the fermi energy in nodal regions . a similar pattern of the spectral density at the fermi energy was predicted by a phenomenological theory of disordered charge stripes and anti - phase spin domains @xcite . unfortunately , this theory does not discuss the origin of renormalized hopping terms in the effective one - body hamiltonian and does not explain the relation of this renormalization with the underlying magnetic structure . the evolution of the spectral weight as a function of doping has been analyzed for the stripe phase by means of the cluster perturbation technique ( cpt ) in the framework of the microscopic @xmath8-@xmath9 and hubbard models @xcite . this theory captures quite well the general trend of this development . nevertheless , it seems that the spectral weight maps derived within this approach for the doping level at and above 12.5% do not show continuous well developed high - intensity straight patches bridging anti - nodal regions . such structures are experimentally seen in nodal regions @xcite . in addition , that theory does not provide us with much information about the magnetic structure of stripes . the remarks made above seem to suggest that some understanding of the relation between the single particle spectral weight of nd - lsco at the filling level about @xmath5 and the formation of the stripe phase is missing . a phase which we may expect to emerge in a natural way in weakly doped afs is a bond - ordered state @xcite . recently , an exact diagonalization of the @xmath8-@xmath9 model ( @xmath10 m ) at a finite cluster has been performed to study stripe formation . it has been shown that the cluster geometry change , from the standard tilted square form of the 20 sites cluster to the rectangular one , @xmath11 cluster induces the formation of a ground state with pronounced stripe - like charge inhomogeneities @xcite . the distribution of peaks in the single - particle spectral weight , which has been calculated by means of the same method @xcite , resembles experimental arpes spectra from @xmath12 @xcite . in particular , the theory captures quite well the strong dispersion along the @xmath13 - @xmath14 line . the spreading of the quasiparticle - peaks in the single - particle spectrum obtained by means of the exact diagonalization is in good agreement with results of an additional calculation performed by means of a different method which is the bond operator theory for the spin - peierls phase . unfortunately , neither the numerical approach nor the analytical method reproduce the flattening of the experimental band near the point @xmath14 and both of them fail to explain the emergence of the spectral weight at the nodal region , in the form of a straight patch which is observed at the fermi energy in the experiments . another analysis of the spectral weight in doped afs , based on the exact diagonalization of a small cluster concerns the @xmath10 m with inhomogeneous terms locally breaking the translational invariance and the spin - rotational su(2 ) symmetry @xcite . the pattern of the spectral weight at the fermi energy obtained by means of this method resembles arpes spectra from nd - lsco at the doping level @xmath15 and does not show enhanced intensity at nodal regions . this enhancement observed in experiments is the manifestation of remnant two - dimensionality ( 2d ) in the stripe system . thus , also this theory seems not account for the shape of arpes spectra from nd - lsco or lsco at the doping level slightly higher than @xmath5 . results of inelastic neutron scattering ( ins ) experiments indicate that pronounced af correlations exist in the stripe phase @xcite . on the other hand , the relevance of bond - order has been recently demonstrated by means of the same experimental method @xcite . in a recent work @xcite we have suggested that the coexistence of bond - order with long range af order may take place in the stripe phase . the scenario of nanoscale phase separation is realized by means of this coexistence . we have shown in the framework of this concept that above the doping level @xmath5 , when the distance between stripe axes is 4 lattice spacing a bond - centered stripe with spin - peierls order on these bonds is more stable than a site - centered stripe . in addition it is also known about the site - centered stripe that it is more stable than a homogeneous system of holes created in the homogeneous af @xcite . the mechanism of coexistence between af order and spin - peierls order in the stripe phase is based on lowering the kinetic energy of holes moving without confinement in hole - rich stripes which are formed in the form of two - leg ladder - like domain walls ( dws ) between af hole - poor domains in which the exchange energy decreases @xcite . in the next section , in the framework of a scenario for nanoscale phase separation and coexistence of af long range order with bond - order , we will derive an effective tight - binding hamiltonian describing a quasiparticle propagating in such a spin background . next we will calculate the part of the spectral function which is accessible to measurements in photoemission experiments . finally we will discuss results of the calculation . they seem to show characteristic features that may be seen in arpes spectra of nd - lsco slightly above the doping level @xmath5 . the @xmath10 m in the framework of which we perform the calculation is @xmath16 the states in which any site is doubly occupied have been excluded by definition from the hilbert space in which that model acts . @xmath17 represents pairs of nearest neighbor ( nn ) sites . @xmath18 and @xmath19 denote the operators of electron spin and density at site @xmath20 respectively . @xmath8 represents the hopping matrix element @xmath21 between nn sites in the square lattice on which the @xmath10 m is defined , @xmath22- the hopping matrix element @xmath21 between second nn sites , and @xmath23 - the hopping matrix element between third nn sites . the rest of @xmath21 is zero . we concentrate on the doping level about @xmath5 at which the distance between axes of nearest stripes is 4 lattice spacings and af correlations seem to be of long range @xcite . our previous analysis has provided convincing arguments that in such a case the stripe takes the form of a two - leg ladder - like dw which separates hole - poor af domains @xcite . the phase of sublattice magnetization in domains changes by @xmath0 across a dw . each dw is in the spin - peierls state with singlets formed on legs . the underlying spin structure of the stripe system at the doping level about @xmath5 has been presented in fig.[fig1 ] . a natural question arises , what is mechanism which gives rise to long range af correlations , if af domains are separated by dws which consist of singlets ? the structure depicted in fig.[fig1 ] emerges in the presence of holes only . that presence is induced by doping . the creation of a hole gives rise to appearance of an uncompensated spin in the dw . this spin may be parallel or antiparallel to a nearest spin in the neighbor domain . the weight of states in which these spins are antiparallel , fig.[fig2](a ) , ( b ) , is higher , because such a configuration is preferred by af coupling between nn sites . states depicted by fig.[fig2](a ) and ( b ) are coupled by the hopping term in the hamiltonian . since their weight is higher than the weight of states in which an uncompensated spin in the dw and the nearest spin in the domain are parallel , the hopping term which transforms the state depicted by fig.[fig2 ] ( a ) into the state depicted by fig.[fig2](b ) , mediates effective ferromagnetic ( fm ) coupling between sites @xmath20 and @xmath24 . some quantum fluctuations will be present in the underlying spin background of the stripe system . they may take the form of triplet excitations on bonds in dws and multimagnon excitations in domains . fig.[fig4 ] in the previous work @xcite contains some examples of quantum fluctuations in the spin background . they contribute a lot to the energy of the system . on the other hand , it seems that quantum fluctuations merely renormalize the shape of quasiparticle dispersion for a given spin background and do not change the picture qualitatively . this has been demonstrated in the case of a hole propagating in the af spin background @xcite , as well as in the case of bond ordered two - leg ladders @xcite and bond - ordered 2d systems @xcite . when it is necessary we will take into account the influence of quantum fluctuations on the distribution of spectral weight . a scenario which underlies the calculation which we are going to outline next , is based on the assumption that hole motion inside ladder - like dws is governed by the exchange of positions between a hole - fermion pair on a bond and a singlet on a nearby bond @xcite . this exchange is mediated by the hopping terms in the initial hamiltonian ( [ hamorg ] ) . we also assume that a hole propagates in the af spin background as a spin polaron @xcite . in the calculation we take into account a simplest form of coupling which moves a hole between a bond ordered dw and an af domain . this form of coupling originates in the hopping term of the initial hamiltonian . before we proceed to construct an effective hamiltonian which describes the motion of a quasiparticle in the underlying spin background , we will present some formulas which will be useful for that purpose . a singlet on two sites `` @xmath25 '' and `` @xmath26 '' , is created in the vacuum by the operator @xmath27_{\alpha \beta } c^\dagger_{l \alpha } c^\dagger_{u \beta}. \label{sin}\ ] ] @xmath28 is the two - dimensional identity matrix and @xmath29 , @xmath30 , are pauli matrices . the summation over repeating greek indices is assumed . three operators which are components of the vector @xmath31 create three triplet states on sites @xmath25 and @xmath26 , @xmath32_{\alpha \beta } c^\dagger_{l \alpha } c^\dagger_{u \beta}. \label{trip}\ ] ] a formula which we will often use later is @xmath33 the left side of ( [ hsex ] ) together with the right - side term which contains a singlet at the pair of sites @xmath34 and @xmath35 represent the exchange of a singlet and a hole - fermion pair between two bonds , which is mediated by the hopping term in the initial hamiltonian . as we have already stated before , we will neglect the creation of triplets on bonds , however this process also takes place during hole hopping . the creation of a triplet is represented by the second term at the right side of ( [ hsex ] ) . we also need formulas which represent the hopping of a hole from a single site @xmath20 which belongs to an af domain to a site which belongs to a bond occupied by a singlet and vice versa @xmath36_{\alpha \beta } \mathbf{t}^\dagger_{lu } ) |0\rangle . \label{defs2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] when we start to analyze contributions from quantum fluctuations in the ground state of the system to the spectral function we will need followings formulas @xmath37 we begin the derivation of the effective hamiltonian describing hole propagation in the spin background depicted by fig.[fig1 ] with outlining the mechanism of hole propagation inside an af domain . a hole created and moving in the nel background shifts spins between different sublattices and creates defects in the af structure , fig.[fig3 ] ( a)-(c ) . such a process gives rise to an increase of the ising energy . this rise is roughly speaking proportional to the length of a path along which the hole has traveled , which means that a tendency towards hole confinement appears @xcite . in order to take into account such a tendency we will analyze hole motion in the framework of a basis which consists of states representing holes confined in the af background by linear defects ( strings ) left behind by moving holes on their way . we call these states spin polarons . a wave function representing a confined spin polaron at a site @xmath20 in an af domain is a combination of states which are created from the state @xmath38 by the nn hopping term when a hole created at the site @xmath20 starts to move , @xmath39 @xmath40 is the nel state in the domain , @xmath41 denotes a state obtained by hopping along a path @xmath42 of a hole created at the site @xmath20 . @xmath43 is the amplitude of this state . we have assumed for simplicity that @xmath43 depends solely on the length @xmath44 of the path @xmath42 . the length of a path or of a string state is defined as the number of hops needed to form a given string state from a state representing a hole created in the af spin medium . at the first stage of the analysis we take into account only the hopping between nn sites because @xmath45 . processes related to hopping between further neighbors and processes related to swapping antiparallel spins by the transversal term in the exchange interaction will be considered later as a perturbation . a hole moving inside a domain may make its first step in @xmath46 directions . @xmath47=4 is the coordination number of the square lattice . there are in principle @xmath48 direction choices of each next hop , if the hole moves without retracing inside the domain . on the square lattice there are @xmath47 choices for the direction of the first step and @xmath46 for the direction of further hops during the non - retractable motion . these number gets reduced by one for the domain formed by two chains of sites . thus if we neglect some details , as for example path crossing , we may write , @xmath49 each prefactor in ( [ norm ] ) at the square @xmath50 represents the number of different paths with the length @xmath51 . we calculate the energy of the spin polaron state @xmath52 , @xmath53 , which is given by the expectation value of a trial hamiltonian @xmath54 , @xmath55 , with the assumption , that the motion of a hole which has started from the site @xmath20 , is restricted to the interior of the domain , and that the contribution from the interaction term is restricted to the ising part @xmath56 , @xmath57\frac{j}{2 } \nonumber\\ & + & 2(z-1)\sum_{\mu=0}(z-2)^\mu \alpha_\mu \alpha_{\mu+1}t . \label{ph0p}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the first term in ( [ ph0p ] ) basically counts the number of `` broken bonds '' , that are not occupied by a pair of antiparallel spins , in which case the ising contribution to the energy of that bond is higher by @xmath58 than in the case if it were occupied by a pair of antiparallel spins . the second term in ( [ ph0p ] ) is the contribution from the hopping operator to the spin polaron energy . the prefactors appearing in this term represent the number of paths with a given length multiplied by the number of directions in which these paths may be extended . the appearance of the factor 2 is related to the fact that the hopping which couples paths of length @xmath51 and @xmath59 may take place forth and back . the values of these paths @xmath60 can be found by minimizing @xmath61 under the constraint @xmath62 after we have constructed spin polarons which are formed in af domains we are able to present the full basis of single - particle states . the underlying spin background which has been presented in fig.[fig1 ] plays the role of the vacuum @xmath63 for hole - like quasiparticles which propagate in this background . @xmath63 has been obtained by acting on the absolute vacuum @xmath64 , in which no particles are present , with a product of operators like @xmath65 creating singlets on bonds connecting sites @xmath25 and @xmath26 and operators @xmath66 creating spins in domains according to the pattern shown in fig.[fig1 ] . new fermionic positively charged operators @xmath67 create single particle hole - like states from the vacuum for holes @xmath68 . the action of the operator @xmath69 on @xmath68 , where the site @xmath70 belongs to a ladder - like dw , exchanges the operator @xmath65 in the product defining @xmath68 by the operator @xmath71 , which means that instead of a singlet on the bond connecting sites @xmath25 and @xmath26 there is a hole on the site @xmath70 and spin @xmath72 on the site @xmath73 . the action of the operator @xmath67 on a site @xmath20 which belongs to an af domain , creates a spin polaron @xmath52 in that domain . the spin polaron is a combination of some states , the amplitudes of which are given by prefactors @xmath60 . these states include @xmath74 and states obtained by applying consecutively the nn inside - domain hopping term to the state @xmath74 . during this process , the hole hops without retraces and @xmath51 is @xmath44 , the length of the path @xmath42 , along which the hole has traveled to form a given component state of @xmath52 . a label which we will use to mark the fermionic operator creating either a bond hole or a hole - like spin polaron at a give site is @xmath75 . @xmath76 refers to the column number of the unitary cell to which belongs the site where the hole - like particle has been created , @xmath77 refers to the row number of the unitary cell , and @xmath20 ( column ) , @xmath24 ( row ) are indices representing the position of that site inside the unitary cell . @xmath20 and @xmath24 run from 0 to 7 and from 0 to 1 , respectively . now we start to explain with some details the origin of contributions to the effective hamiltonian for a single quasiparticle propagating in the spin background depicted by fig.[fig1 ] which is an exemplification of coexistence between af and bond orders . we concentrate on the case of a spin - up quasiparticle . within the approximation which we use , operators @xmath78 create in the vacuum @xmath68 eigenstates of the unperturbed hamiltonian @xmath54 , @xmath79 where @xmath17 are pairs of sites on which singlets depicted in fig.[fig1 ] have been formed and @xmath80 are pairs of nn sites belonging to af domains . action of @xmath54 is restricted to the space containing states in which none of the sites is doubly occupied . this hamiltonian contains the ising part of the exchange energy of links inside domains . it also drives hole hopping between nn sites inside each domain . since all matrix elements which may give rise to deconfinement of a hole , have been by definition removed from @xmath54 , polaron states @xmath52 are its eigenstates . processes which bring about deconfinement of holes will be treated at the latter stage of the calculation as a perturbation . the exchange energy and the hopping between sites belonging to bonds occupied by singlets in fig.[fig1 ] are the only contribution to the hamiltonian @xmath54 from dws . terms in the hamiltonian of the @xmath10 m which couple a site belonging to a ladder - like dw with a site belonging to a domain do not contribute to @xmath54 . it is clear that the vacuum state @xmath68 and the single particle states @xmath81 are eigenstates of @xmath54 . within the first order approximation the on - site energy of a quasiparticle with spin up created at the site @xmath82 which belongs to a dw is @xmath83 . from now on , the reference value of the energy is the energy of the vacuum state @xmath68 . the contribution from a destroyed singlet to the on - site energy of a hole - like quasiparticle created at the site @xmath82 is @xmath84 . a hole - like quasiparticle occupying the site @xmath82 with spin up is by definition the same as a single fermion with spin up which occupies the site @xmath85 belonging to the bond @xmath85-@xmath82 . since spins on the sites @xmath85 and @xmath86 are in this case parallel , the lowest order contribution to the exchange energy of the bond between these two sites additionally increases by @xmath87 compared to the contribution from this bond in the vacuum state @xmath68 . in the presence of a hole , the contribution from the potential term @xmath88 in the initial hamiltonian of the @xmath10 m is higher by @xmath9 . by adding all partial contribution we get the value @xmath83 of the total on - site energy of the spin - up quasiparticle at the site @xmath82 . the same on - site energy have spin up quasiparticles created in dws at all sites which are nn of sites in domains occupied by spins pointing down . finally we deduce that in the effective single - particle hamiltonian appears a term @xmath89 . \label{d1heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the fermionic operators @xmath90 and @xmath91 transform the underlying vacuum @xmath68 into the single particle state described above and the single particle state into @xmath68 , respectively . the notation for indices which we use seems not to be very short , but such a form of it is basically unavoidable because the elementary cell of the underlying spin background , fig.[fig1 ] , is rather big . that notation also helps to trace easily at the map which is fig.[fig1 ] , the results of hopping events mediated by the hamiltonian @xmath92 . an analogous term will appear in the hamiltonian representing a propagating spin - down quasiparticle , but with a different set of indices labelling sites in the elementary cell . the creation of the spin down quasiparticle at these sites , @xmath13 , @xmath93 , @xmath94 , @xmath95 induces the formation at the ladder leg of an uncompensated spin , the direction of which is parallel to the direction of the nearest spin in the domain . for the sake of simplicity we will concentrate in this paper on the propagation of the spin - up quasiparticle . such a simplification is possible because despite the breakdown of the time reversal symmetry by the underlying spin structure , the energy of the spin - up and the spin - down quasiparticles is degenerate . later we will user this observation in the calculation . the on - site energy of the hole - like quasiparticle is lower for a group of sites by @xmath58 then for sites to which the contribution ( [ d1heff ] ) refers because spin of the bond - fermion which appears after a hole has been created at a bond initially occupied by a singlet may be antiparallel to the nearest spin in one of domains , @xmath96 . \label{d2heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] let us concentrate now on the on - site energy of quasiparticles created at sites belonging to domains . a spin - up hole - like spin polaron can by definition be created exclusively at sites which have been initially occupied by a spin - down fermion . an obvious contribution to the on - site energy of a hole - like quasiparticle energy in domains is @xmath53 , the minimum value of the matrix element ( [ ph0p ] ) obtained under the constraint @xmath97 . during the construction of spin polarons we have considered only hopping between nn sites , which is governed by the hopping with the highest integral @xmath8 . we have also neglected some `` high order '' processes related to path crossing or to the action of the xy term in the heisenberg model . in the analysis which we start now , we will discuss in the framework of the first order perturbation theory the contribution of some neglected processes to the effective hamiltonian @xmath92 . states depicted by figs.4(b ) and ( c ) are string states of length 1 and are components of the spin - polaron wave - function @xmath98 at the site @xmath20 . a single vertical or horizontal hop of the hole created in the af background at the site @xmath20 gives rise to the states depicted by figs.[fig4](b ) and ( c ) respectively . the hopping term to next nearest neighbors ( nnn ) which we treat as a perturbation couples states represented by figs.4(b ) and ( c ) , which brings about a contribution to the matrix element @xmath99 , where @xmath100 . this contribution is @xmath101 we recognize in ( [ con1 ] ) a product of amplitudes with which string states of length 1 appear in the definition ( [ polar ] ) of the spin polaron state . the factor 4 which appears in ( [ con1 ] ) is related to the fact that hopping which couples states ( b ) and ( c ) may occur in both directions and that analogous coupling takes place between the state depicted by fig.[fig4](c ) and the state depicted by fig.[fig4](d ) . the state depicted by fig.[fig4](d ) has been obtained by a single downward hop of a hole created in the af domain at the site @xmath20 . the contribution @xmath102 to @xmath103 originates in a similar way with coupling between states depicted in fig.[fig4](c ) and ( d ) by the hopping term to third nearest neighbor ( tnn ) sites . the coupling between longer string states which are components of the same spin - polaron wave - function may also contribute to the renormalization of the spin - polaron on - site energy . to be more specific , the coupling between states as depicted by figs.[fig4](e ) and ( f ) and between their reflections in the horizontal line running through the site @xmath20 gives rise to the correction @xmath104 \label{con3}\ ] ] to @xmath103 , while the coupling between the state depicted by fig.[fig4](g ) and its reflection in the horizontal line running through the site @xmath20 together with some similar process in which longer strings are involved brings about the correction @xmath105 . \label{con4}\ ] ] the states represented by figs.[fig4](e ) , ( f ) and ( g ) have been obtained by means of three different sequences of hole moves . the hole has been created at the site @xmath20 and these sequences are upwards - upwards , upwards - left and left - upwards respectively . longer strings pinned to the site @xmath20 may be coupled in a very similar way , which also gives rise to a change of the on - site energy . this change has actually already been incorporated into parameters @xmath106 and @xmath107 . finally , by collecting all terms we may infer that in the effective hamiltonian @xmath92 appears the following term referring to the on - site energy of spin - polarons @xmath108 . \label{d3heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the additional term @xmath87 in the prefactor is related to the fact that the contribution from the contact interaction -@xmath109 between a site @xmath20 in a domain and a site @xmath24 in a dw is higher by @xmath87 , when a hole is created in the domain at the site i. this interaction was neglected , when we were calculating the eigenenergy @xmath53 of the spin polaron and needs to be taken into account now . ( [ d3heff ] ) is the last on - site term in the effective hamiltonian . the nn hopping integral for the quasiparticle , the propagation of which we describe in this paper is the same as the bare hopping integral provided that the sites between which the quasiparticle moves belong to the same initially ordered bond inside a dw @xcite . thus , the term which describes the quasiparticle hopping between nn sites , on which singlets have been formed in the underlying spin background , takes the following form @xmath110 + h.c.\}. \nonumber\\ \label{d4heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the nn hopping integral for a pair of sites , which belong to different singlets in the underlying insulating state is @xmath111 instead of -@xmath8 . this change of sign and this reduction of size may be deduced from the form of the first term on the right side of eq.([hsex ] ) . therefore , we may write the following expression for the contribution to the effective hamiltonian describing quasiparticle hopping between nn sites belonging to different bonds on which singlets has been formed in the underlying spin background @xmath112 + h.c.\}. \nonumber\\ \label{d5heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the value of the nn hopping integral , between a site which belongs to a domain and a site which belongs a dw , can be inferred from the first part of the right side in eq.([defs2 ] ) , @xmath113 + h.c.\}. \label{d6heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] since the time reversal symmetry and the translational symmetry are broken inside af domains , the propagating quasiparticle can not move between different sublattices and any term related to nn hopping inside domains is not generated in the effective hamiltonian @xmath92 . nnn quasiparticle hopping inside dws and hopping between sites which belong to a dw and a domain is a first order process that is mediated by the nnn hopping term in the bare hamiltonian . the explicit forms of related contributions to @xmath92 may be deduced from formulas ( [ hsex ] ) , ( [ defs1 ] ) and ( [ defs2 ] ) , @xmath114 + h.c.\ } , \label{d7heff } \\ \delta_8 h_{eff}&= & -\frac{t'}{\sqrt{2 } } \alpha_0 \sum_{m , n } \ { [ h^\dagger_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m-1,n}{7,1 } \uparrow } h_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{0,0 } \uparrow } \nonumber\\ & + & h^\dagger_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m-1,n-1}{7,1 } \uparrow } h_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{0,0 } \uparrow } + h^\dagger_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{2,1 } \uparrow } h_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{0,0 } \uparrow } \nonumber\\ & + & h^\dagger_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n-1}{2,1 } \uparrow } h_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{0,0 } \uparrow } + h^\dagger_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{3,0 } \uparrow } h_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{4,1 } \uparrow } \nonumber\\ & + & h^\dagger_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n+1}{3,0 } \uparrow } h_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{4,1 } \uparrow } + h^\dagger_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{6,0 } \uparrow } h_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{5,1 } \uparrow } \nonumber\\ & + & h^\dagger_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n+1}{6,0 } \uparrow } h_{\genfrac{(}{)}{0pt}{}{m , n}{5,1 } \uparrow } ] + h.c.\}. \label{d8heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the task of finding the formula for the term describing nnn hopping inside af domains is little bit more tedious . for example the coupling by the xy term in the heisenberg model between string states depicted by fig.[fig4](f ) and ( h ) gives rise to hopping terms in @xmath92 which shift a spin polaron from the site @xmath20 to the site @xmath24 and vice versa . we analyze now the xy term , because it has been neglected during the first stage of the analysis , when quasi - confined spin polaron states have been constructed . since the string state depicted by fig.[fig4](f ) is a component of the wave function @xmath52 for the spin polaron created at the site @xmath20 and the string state depicted by fig.[fig4](h ) is evidently a component of the wave function for the spin polaron created at the site @xmath24 , the coupling between these components gives rise to the coupling between spin polaron states @xmath52 and @xmath115 . this brings about a contribution to the matrix element @xmath116 and to the hopping term in the effective hamiltonian @xmath92 . it is probably useful to remind now that @xmath92 is an approximation to the initial hamiltonian @xmath117 in ( [ hamorg ] ) . this approximation is expressed in terms of the operators creating and annihilating spin polarons . also the coupling between the states depicted by fig.[fig4](g ) and ( h ) contributes to the hopping term between the sites @xmath20 and @xmath24 in the effective hamiltonian @xmath92 . this coupling is mediated by the xy term . we have already discussed the action of the xy term which by removing two defects in the af structure transforms string states of length 2 , tails of which are pinned to the site @xmath20 , into the state representing a hole created at the site @xmath24 in the af ordered domain . by a string tail we mean its end opposite the end at which sits a hole . the xy term may also transform a state representing a hole created in the domain at the site @xmath20 into a string state of length 2 pinned at the tail to the site @xmath24 . this additional coupling between components of the spin polaron states at the sites @xmath20 and @xmath24 doubles the value of the hopping integral between these sites in the effective hamiltonian . thus , after a little thought we may deduce that the integral for the nnn hopping inside domains is @xmath118 the first term in the sum presented above refers to coupling between strings of length 0 and 2 . we have just outlined its origin in detail . other terms appear in the sum ( [ tau1 ] ) because longer strings , which are created when a hole moves further from the site @xmath24 in figs.[fig4](f ) , ( g ) and ( h ) , are also coupled by the xy term in the heisenberg model . the hop left of the hole depicted by fig.[fig4](g ) gives rise to the string state of length three , fig.[fig4](i ) , which is pinned to the site @xmath24 . since we neglected the possibility of path crossing when we were constructing the quasiconfined spin - polaron states , some corrections need to be made now . for example we did not consider before , that by applying the nn hopping term to the state depicted by fig.[fig4](i ) we may create the state depicted by fig.[fig4](j ) . since the latter state is a string - like component of the spin - polaron at the site @xmath24 obtained by hopping downward and left of a hole created at that site , we deduce that the process described above generates the nnn hopping term in the effective hamiltonian with the amplitude @xmath119 the factor 2 originates with the fact that the motion of a hole around a plaque in the square lattice may take place clockwise and anti - clockwise . we also recognize @xmath120 and @xmath121 as amplitudes of strings , which have the length 3 and 2 , respectively . exactly such strings which are components of the spin - polaron states at the sites @xmath20 and @xmath24 in figs.[fig4](i ) , ( j ) are coupled by the nn hopping term in the initial hamiltonian . the nnn term in the initial hamiltonian generates coupling between states representing `` bare '' holes created in the af background of domains . since these states are also string components with the length 0 of some spin polaron wave functions , coupling between the latter is also generated . an example of such coupled string states are figs.[fig4](h ) and ( k ) . the contribution to the nnn hopping integral in @xmath92 is @xmath122 the nnn term in the bare hamiltonian also couples states depicted by figs.[fig4](f ) and ( l ) which are string - like components with length 2 of spin - polaron states at the sites @xmath20 and @xmath24 , respectively . the coupling amplitude is @xmath123 the appearance of the factor 2 is related to the fact that states which are created when holes move between the sites @xmath20 and @xmath24 in opposite directions around the plaque , than in the case of the states depicted by figs.[fig4](f ) and ( l ) are also coupled by the bare nnn hopping . the state in fig.[fig4](l ) has been obtained by hopping left and downward of a hole which has been initially created at the site @xmath24 . by collecting all contributions , which we have discussed above , we see that the new term in to @xmath92 is , @xmath124 + h.c.\}. \nonumber\\ \label{d9heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] by means of a similar analysis , as for the hopping between nnn sites we may find the tnn hopping term in the effective hamiltonian . for the operator representing the quasiparticle hopping inside dws we get @xmath125 + h.c.\}. \label{d10heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the tnn hopping of the quasiparticle between domains and dws is governed by the following term @xmath126 + h.c.\}. \label{d11heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] to tnn hopping term between sites in domains contribute : a ) the mechanism which is based on the shortening of strings by the action of the xy term , b ) the coupling of strings with length 0 by the tnn hopping term in the initial hamiltonian and c ) the exchange between the head and the tail of a straight string with length 2 . the last process is mediated by the tnn hopping term in the initial hamiltonian ( [ hamorg ] ) . the contributions to the hopping integral in these three cases are @xmath127 since the origin of these couplings is the same as for the nnn hopping term in @xmath92 we do not discuss them in detail . thus , the tnn hopping operator , which is the last contribution to @xmath92 discussed by us at the approximation level , that we have assumed , takes the form , @xmath128 + h.c.\}. \label{d12heff}\end{aligned}\ ] ] fig.[pardisp ] depicts the electronic structure which we have obtained by solving the hamiltonian @xmath92 . it represents the energy dispersion e(*p * ) of all bands along the line @xmath13-@xmath14 -@xmath129-@xmath13 and the line obtained by performing the rotation by @xmath130 around the point @xmath13 . such a combination of dispersion curves is justified by conditions in which experiments are performed , because it seems that stripes in some regions of the sample may run vertically , while in other regions they may run horizontally . the reason for this mixing can be , for example , sample twinning . nondispersing parts of bands are related to some obstacles for hole propagation in the directions perpendicular to stripes . that kind of motion seems to be blocked , which is clear because @xmath92 by definition can not mediate quasiparticle motion occurring exclusively in the direction perpendicular to stripes . it seems that the lack of the energy dispersion in some directions accounts for straight patches of the spectral weight which appear in the density maps obtained by means of arpes measurements @xcite . the coordination frame applied to draw these maps is the same as we have used to obtain fig.[pardisp ] ( momentum - energy ) , while the second derivative of arpes spectra plays the role of a density - like parameter which marks regions with the high spectral weight @xcite . we shall make a more detailed comparison with arpes spectra , after we calculate the spectral weight by means of the approach applied by us . that approach is based , as we have already mentioned several times , on a combination of bond and string formalisms . arpes probes the one - particle spectral function @xmath131 . we neglect in the further analysis of arpes spectra the influence of temperature . we also assume that the description of the photoelectric effect in terms of fermi s golden rule is sufficient and finally we omit , in the calculation , electromagnetic dipole matrix elements between the wave function of photoelectron and the wave functions of the electrons in the initial states . furthermore , we apply the single particle approximation , in the calculation of the spectral function @xmath131 , which is natural , because the hamiltonian @xmath92 by definition does not contain the interaction terms . since electrons are emitted by the photoelectric effect , at @xmath132 information is gathered only about the one - electron removal part of the spectral function , which takes the form @xmath133 due to the formation of the stripe structure the shape of which is determined by the underlying spin background depicted by fig.[fig1 ] , the 1bz gets reduced by a factor of 8 in the horizontal direction and by a factor of 2 in the vertical direction . the hamiltonian @xmath92 may be written in the diagonal form in terms of operators @xmath134 , and their hermitian conjugates , which are determined by the form of hamiltonian eigenstates , @xmath135 where @xmath136 belongs to the reduced 1bz , @xmath137 labels the band number , @xmath138 is the length of the elementary supercell , @xmath139 is the width of the elementary supercell and @xmath140 is the system size . thus , within the single - particle approach , the one - electron removal part of the spectral function is approximated as @xmath141 where @xmath142 denotes the vector @xmath143 reduced to the 1bz of the superlattice , the elementary cell of which is depicted by fig.[fig1 ] and @xmath144 is the energy of the @xmath137-th band in fig.[pardisp ] . in order to evaluate ( [ spsfap ] ) we need to find matrix elements , @xmath145 a scheme showing how to do this in the framework of the spin polaron ( string ) approach was developed before @xcite . for example , the removal of the spin down electron at the site @xmath146 in the elementary cell of the underlying spin background depicted by fig.[fig1 ] gives rise to a state which is component of the wave function for the polaron created at this site . thus the matrix element ( [ matel ] ) for @xmath147 and @xmath148 is @xmath149 . in the appendix we list all sites labelled by the pairs of numbers @xmath150 , @xmath151 , @xmath152 , for which a nonvanishing matrix element ( [ matel ] ) exists . the removal of a spin down electron from a site which belongs to ladder - like dws in the state depicted by fig.[fig1 ] gives rise to the hole - like quasiparticle @xmath153 at this site . since this removal may be mediated by the electron annihilation operator @xmath154 in ( [ matel ] ) , a nonvanishing diagonal matrix element @xmath155 is generated . quantum spin fluctuation which are generated in the underlying spin background schematically depicted by fig.[fig1 ] can not be neglected when we evaluate the spectral function . within the first order perturbation theory the admixture @xmath156 of quantum fluctuations to the groundstate @xmath157 of @xmath54 brought about by the perturbation @xmath158 is @xmath159 where @xmath160 are excited eigenstates of @xmath54 with energies @xmath161 and @xmath162 is the groundstate energy . the action of the exchange interaction between sites depicted by fig.[qnfns](a ) , @xmath70 belonging to a dw and @xmath163 belonging to an af domain , may transform the singlet on sites @xmath25 and @xmath26 into a triplet . within our approach we treat this part of the exchange interaction as the perturbation . the transformed state is an excited eigenstate of @xmath54 with the energy @xmath9 and also a quantum fluctuation that , according to the formula ( [ 1order ] ) , contributes to the underlying vacuum state @xmath68 , about which we assume that it is an eigenstate of the hamiltonian ( [ hamorg ] ) . @xmath68 is schematically depicted by fig.[fig1 ] in which quantum corrections have not been taken into account even within the framework of the first order perturbation theory . the electron annihilation operator @xmath154 that acts on a site belonging to a bond , which has been excited to the triplet state , transforms it into the state representing the hole - like quasiparticle @xmath153 created at that site . this process gives rise an addendum to the matrix element ( [ matel ] ) . this addendum may be attributed to the existence of quantum corrections to the vacuum state @xmath68 . for example the value of this addendum is -@xmath164 for the matrix element ( [ matel ] ) labelled by the indices @xmath165 . the xy part of the exchange interaction which we treat as a perturbation , creates in @xmath68 an excitation that takes the form of two nn spins turned upside down , fig.[qnfns](b ) , with respect to the underlying spin structure , fig.[fig1 ] . according to the recipe ( [ 1order ] ) this excitation contributes a correction to the underlying vacuum state @xmath68 . if the annihilation operator @xmath154 removes the spin down fermion at the site @xmath24 in fig.[qnfns](b ) , the configuration depicted by fig.[qnfns](c ) will be created , which is a string state , a component of the wave function @xmath166 for the spin polaron at the site @xmath20 . since this spin polaron state is by definition created by the fermionic operator @xmath167 a contribution -@xmath168 to some diagonal matrix elements of the form ( [ matel ] ) is generated . we discuss now the last category of processes which give rise to new terms in the sum that appears in ( [ spsfap ] ) . the electron removal from the site @xmath169 , fig.[fig4](b ) , gives rise to a string state of length 2 , fig.[fig4](d ) , which is a component of the wave function for the spin polaron at the site @xmath20 . since the spin - polaron state is created by the operator @xmath167 , a nonvanishing matrix element is generated . its value is -@xmath170 , which gets multiplied by a factor of 2 , because there are two strings of length two , connecting sites @xmath20 and @xmath169 . by collecting all contributions to the sum which appears in ( [ spsfap ] ) the one - electron removal part of the spectral function @xmath171 can be evaluated . we will apply in the numerical evaluation some lorentzian broadening of the dirac delta function , which is justified because experimental measurements , with which we are going to compare our results , have finite resolution and also some averaging procedure is often applied to present experimental data . it seems that a most complete set of data to compare with our theoretical analysis , provide arpes measurements of the lsco and nd - lsco systems not for the doping level @xmath172 but for the doping level @xmath173 @xcite . we will present our results in a way similar to the method of presentation , which was used in experimental papers reporting these measurements . the nn hopping parameter @xmath8 defines a unit in which energy is measured . we choose @xmath174 , @xmath175 , @xmath176 . similar parameters have been applied in a recent theoretical analysis of arpes spectra in the 2d @xmath10 m , based on the exact diagonalization of the @xmath177 cluster and in a separate calculation performed by means of the bond operator formalism applied to the columnar bond order underlying spin structure @xcite . this coincidence helps to make comparison between results of the calculation presented in our paper and results of the earlier analysis . the choice of the hamiltonian parameters is ever to some extent arbitrary . on the other hand a theoretical analysis of arpes spectra from lsco systems , based on the tight binding approach indicates that the ratios @xmath178 and @xmath179 are lower for these systems than for other members of cuprate family @xcite . parameters suggested by the authors of the analysis based on a tight binding approach @xcite are basically the same as parameters applied in our calculation . the position of the fermi energy in the band structure at the doping level @xmath1 has been determined in our calculation by counting the number of hole - like states . it has been marked as a narrow straight line in fig.[pardisp ] . fig.[parintmap ] depicts the intensity of the one - electron removal spectrum function presented in the coordination frame momentum - energy . contributions from vertical and horizontal stripes have been summed in order to account for presumed coexistence of these structures in different parts of the sample . in some agreement with the experimental result obtained at the doping level @xmath1 @xcite we notice in the calculated spectrum a strongly dispersing band between points @xmath13 and @xmath14/@xmath180 which approaches the fermi level , @xmath181 , near the zone boundary , where it joins a flat patch formed by the region of high spectral intensity . after passing the anti - nodal region as a straight narrow strip , the band - like region of high intensity disappears somewhere between @xmath14/@xmath180 and @xmath129 points . in the calculated spectrum we also notice two cusps near @xmath182 and @xmath183 which are absent in the experimental spectrum . this discrepancy may be attributed to the fact that to this high - intensity patch which looks like a single band in the plot , actually contribute two of many bands which may be seen in fig.[pardisp ] . the band which appears in the results of the exact diagonalization performed for the @xmath10 m and the results of the calculation based on the scenario of the columnar spin - peierls order @xcite has also the strong dispersion but does not flatten in the anti - nodal region . despite that neither the spectral weight of the quasiparticle propagating in the bond ordered spin background nor the spectral weight of the quasiparticle propagating in the af background @xcite resembles arpes spectra from doped lsco and doped nd - lsco in the stripe phase , spectral properties of the model in which these two phases coexist gives rise to qualitative agreement with experimental data . this agreement may be attributed to the fact that the band structure of the model of nano - scale phase separation which we discuss here has some features which are present in band structures of both pure homogeneous phases . for example in our results we actually see a remnant of a strip formed by high intensity which takes the shape of a strongly dispersing band along the line between points @xmath13 and @xmath14/@xmath180 and resembles the band that is formed in the columnar bond - ordered phase . this band - like structure actually does not flatten and reaches the maximum near the points @xmath184/@xmath185 . on the other hand it is likely that the presence of this maximum may be attributed to the brute force method of sewing the bond - ordered parts of the system with the parts which are af - ally ordered . one thing is for sure , that the lack of the straight high intensity patch at the anti - nodal region in results of the theory based on the scenario of the columnar spin - peierls phase demonstrates that the spectral function calculated within this picture does not agree in some details with measured arpes spectra and suggests that it is necessary to take into account also the long range af correlations in order to formulate a theory which accounts for the spectral properties of the cuprates in the stripe phase . in the region between the zone center and antinodal points @xmath14/@xmath180 similar agreement has been observed between the experimental data and results of a calculation based on the dynamical mean field theory ( dmft ) applied to the hubbard model @xcite . along the line connecting the points @xmath13 and @xmath129 both in arpes spectra and in our results we see a band in the vicinity of the fermi surface . this band has a maximum at the points @xmath186 , bends downward and disappears near the zone corner . a similar feature may be observed in the results of an exact diagonalization performed for the @xmath8-@xmath22-@xmath23-@xmath9 model and in the results of the calculation performed within the scenario of the bond - ordered columnar phase @xcite . the dmft of the stripe phase in the hubbard model at the doping level @xmath1 gives rise to a slightly different result , namely it seems that the band crosses the fermi level near the point @xmath186 . the intensity map of the one - electron removal spectral function @xmath187 at the fermi energy obtained in the framework of the scenario which assumes coexistence of bond and af orders is depicted by fig.[parflcut ] . fig.[parflcut](a ) refers to results of the calculation in which we have assumed that bond order is formed on legs in ladder - like dws . that figure also shows some agreement with arpes data from lsco and nd - lsco @xcite obtained for the doping level @xmath1 . we see well developed spectral weight in the nodal regions . these regions are bridged by high - intensity continuous almost straight high - intensity patches . it seems that the agreement between the experimental results and the results of the theory based on the mixture of the bond formalism and the spin polaron approach is better in this respect than the agreement with results of previous calculations based on the cpt applied to microscopic models which are the @xmath10 m and the hubbard model @xcite . fig.[parflcut](b ) depicts the spectral weight at the fermi energy obtained in a separate calculation for the underlying spin background with bond order on rungs . we know from the results of a previous paper @xcite that such a structure is less stable and do not expect much similarity with experimental results . such a lack of similarity may be seen , indeed . for example the high - intensity patches does not form a shape resembling the fermi surface obtained by means of calculations based on the local density approach . such a shape may be observed both in experimental spectra and in fig.[parflcut](a ) . in fig.[parflcut ] apart from patches of high spectral density we notice additional regular structures formed by regions of enhanced intensity . it seems that the origin of thouse structures may be attributed to simplicity of our approach within which fluctuations of the underlying spin structure depicted in fig.[fig1 ] are neglected to a great extent . it is natural to expect that such fluctuations smear out the contribution to the spectral function from excitations which may be classified as incoherent background and only the dominating quasiparticle contributions , which may be seen as bright patches in fig.[parflcut ] , are preserved in the real system . calculations based on the phenomenological approach to disordered charge stripes and antiphase spin domains give rise to a pattern formed by regions of high spectral intensity in the 1bz which strongly resembles arpes spectra @xcite . unfortunately no microscopic justification has been provided , of phenomenological one - body hamiltonians which has been applied to derive the spectral density by means of calculations based on this scenario . our calculation is based on the microscopic @xmath8-@xmath22-@xmath23-@xmath9 model . on the other hand it seems that disorder may give rise spreading of spectral weight over the whole anti - nodal region . such a spreading is not observed in the results of our calculation . in a previous paper we have demonstrated that the magnetic structure of the stripe which we have considered here , is likely to have lowest energy at and above the doping level @xmath188 , if the distance between axes of nearest stripes is 4 lattice spacings , as it has been suggested by experiments @xcite . bond order parallel to stripe axes and long range af order coexist in this magnetic structure . it has been suggested that the shape of the fermi surface seen in arpes spectra from nd - lsco and lsco at the doping level in the range @xmath189 may be also explained in the framework of more conventional band calculations which neglect the formation of nano - scale inhomogeneities @xcite . it seems to be hard to reconcile such a way of thinking with the evidence for stripes forming in these systems . in conclusion , motivated by results of a previous calculation @xcite indicating that , at the doping level @xmath5 and above , the stripe structure , which consists of a ) hole - filled two - leg ladder - like dws with the spin - peierls order formed on legs and b ) af domains of width 2 lattice spacings and with the changing phase of the sublattice magnetization by @xmath0 across each dw , is stable , we have performed the calculation of the single - particle spectral density which is generated in such a system . our analysis has been made in the framework of the @xmath8-@xmath22-@xmath23-@xmath9 model , with parameter values in the range suggested by comparison between band structure calculations and the fermi surface of overdoped lsco systems . the calculation which we have performed is a combination of the bond fermion method and the spin polaron approach . we observe pronounced spectral weight both in the anti - nodal and nodal regions . very similar features may be seen in arpes spectra from lsco and nd - lsco at the filling level @xmath1 , which is exactly the same as we have assumed in the calculation . this similarity is not trivial , because different optional structures of bond order in dws , as the spin - peierls order on rungs in the ladder - like dws or the bond order which takes the shape of two layers in a brick - wall , give rise to spectra at the fermi level which have completely different forms . we consider the observed agreement between experiment and theory as an argument for the scenario of coexisting bond and long range af orders in the stripe phase of doped cuprates . we list here contributions to matrix elements ( [ matel ] ) . the contribution to ( [ matel ] ) is @xmath149 for the following values of indices @xmath150 , @xmath151 , @xmath152 : ( 2,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 2,1 ) ; ( 3,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 3,0 ) ; ( 4,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 4,0 ) ; ( 5,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 5,1 ) . the contribution is -@xmath190 for ( 0,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) ; ( 0,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 0,1 ) ; ( 1,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 1,0 ) ; ( 1,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 1,1 ) ; ( 4,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 4,0 ) ; ( 4,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 4,1 ) ; ( 5,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 5,0 ) ; ( 5,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 5,1 ) ; -@xmath191 for ( 0,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) ; ( 1,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 1,0 ) ; ( 4,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 4,1 ) ; ( 5,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 5,1 ) ; @xmath191 for ( 0,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 0,1 ) ; ( 1,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 1,1 ) ; ( 4,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 4,0 ) ; ( 5,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 5,0 ) ; -@xmath192 for ( 2,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 2,1 ) ; ( 2,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 3,0 ) ; ( 2,0 ) , ( 0,-1 ) , ( 2,1 ) ; ( 3,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 2,1 ) ; ( 3,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 3,0 ) ; ( 3,1 ) , ( 0,1 ) , ( 3,0 ) ; ( 6,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 6,0 ) ; ( 6,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 7,1 ) ; ( 6,1 ) , ( 0,1 ) , ( 6,0 ) ; ( 7,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 6,0 ) ; ( 7,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 7,1 ) ; ( 7,0 ) , ( 0,-1 ) , ( 7,1 ) ; -@xmath193 for ( 2,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 3,0 ) ; ( 2,1 ) , ( 0,1 ) , ( 3,0 ) ; ( 3,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 2,1 ) ; ( 3,0 ) , ( 0,-1 ) , ( 2,1 ) ; ( 6,0 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 7,1 ) ; ( 6,0 ) , ( 0,-1 ) , ( 7,1 ) ; ( 7,1 ) , ( 0,0 ) , ( 6,0 ) ; ( 7,1 ) , ( 0,1 ) , ( 6,0 ) ; -@xmath194 for ( 2,1 ) , ( 0,1 ) , ( 2,1 ) ; ( 2,1 ) , ( 0,-1 ) , ( 2,1 ) ; ( 3,0 ) , ( 0,1 ) , ( 3,0 ) ; ( 3,0 ) , ( 0,-1 ) , ( 3,0 ) ; ( 6,0 ) , ( 0,1 ) , ( 6,0 ) ; ( 6,0 ) , ( 0,-1 ) , ( 6,0 ) ; ( 7,1 ) , ( 0,1 ) , ( 7,1 ) ; ( 7,1 ) , ( 0,-1 ) , ( 7,1 ) . t. r. thurston , r. j. birgeneau , m. a. kastner , n. w. preyer , g. shirane , y. fujii , k. yamada , y. endoh , k. kakuri , m. matsuda , y. hidaka , and t. murakami , phys . b * 40 * , 4585 ( 1989 ) ; s .- w . cheong , g. aeppli , t. e. mason , h. mook , s. m. hyden , p. c. canfield , z. fisk , k. n. clausen , and j. l. martinez , phys . lett . * 67 * , 1791 ( 1991 ) ; t. r. thurston , p. m. gehring , g. shirane , r. j. birgeneau , m. a. kastner , y. endoh , m. matsuda , k. yamada , k. kojima , and i. tanaka , phys . rev . b * 46 * , 9128 ( 1992 ) . j. m. tranquada , b. j. sternlieb , j. d. axe , y. nakamura , s. uchida , nature * 375 * , 561 ( 1995 ) . m. matsuda , r. j. birgeneau , h. chou , y. endoh , m. a. kastner , h. kojima , k. kuroda , g. shirane , i. tanaka , and k. yamada , j. phys . . jpn . * 62 * , 443 ( 1993 ) ; k. yamada , s. wakimoto , g. shirane , c. h. lee , m. a. kastner , s. hosoya , m. greven , y. endoh , and r. j. birgeneau , phys . lett . * 75 * , 1626 ( 1995 ) ; k. hirota , k. yamada , i. tanaka , and h. kojima , physica b * 241 - 243 * , 817 ( 1998 ) ; h. kimura , et al , phys . b * 59 * , 6517 ( 1999 ) ; j. m. tranquada , n. ichikawa , k. kakurai , and s. uchida , j. phys . solids * 60 * , 1019 ( 1999 ) ; j. m. tranquada , n. ichikawa , and s. uchida , phys . b * 59 * , 14712 ( 1999 ) . s. a. kivelson , i. p. bindloss , e. fradkin , v. oganesyan , j. m. tranquada , a. kapitulnik , and c. howald , rev . phys . * 75 * , 1201 ( 2003 ) . y. ando , k. segawa , s. komiya , and a. n. lavrov , phys . . lett . * 88 * , 137005 ( 2002 ) . c. hess , b. bchner , m. hcker , r. gross , and s - w . cheong , phys . b * 59 * , 10397 ( 1999 ) . a. w. hunt , p. m. singer , k. r. thurber , and t. imai , phys . lett . * 82 * , 4300 ( 1999 ) ; m .- h . julien , f. borsa , p. carreta , m. horvati , c. berthier , and c. t. lin , phys . lett . * 83 * , 604 ( 1999 ) ; p. m. singer , a. w. hunt , a. f. cederstrm , and t. imai , phys . b * 60 * , 15345 ( 1999 ) ; b. j. suh , p. c. hammel , m. hcker , and b. bchner , phys . rev . b * 59 * , r3952 ( 1999 ) ; n. j. curro , p. c. hammel , b. j. suh , m. hcker , b. bchner , a. ammerahl , and a. revcolevschi , phys . lett . * 85 * , 642 ( 2000 ) ; b. j. suh , p. c. hammel , m. hcker , b. bchner , u. ammerahl , and a. revcolevschi , phys . rev . b * 61 * , r9265 ( 2000 ) ; g. b. teitelbaum , b. bchner , and h. de gronckel , phys . rev . lett . * 84 * , 2949 ( 2000 ) , a. w. hunt , p. m. singer , a. f. cederstrm , and t. imai , phys . b * 64 * , 134525 ( 2001 ) ; h .- h . julien , a. campana , a. rigamonti , p. carretta , f. borsa , p. kuhns , a. p. reyes , w. g. moulton , m. horvati , c. berthier , a. vietkin , and a. revcolevschi , phys . b * 63 * , 144508 ( 2001 ) ; g. b. teitelbaum , i. m. abu - shiekah , o. bakharev , h. b. brom , and j. zaanen , phys . rev . b * 63 * , 020507 ( 2001 ) ; b. simovi , p. c. hammel , m. hcker , b. bchner , and a. revcoleschi , phys . rev . b * 68 * , 012415 ( 2003 ) . e. s. boin , g. h. kwei , h. takagi , and s. j. l. billinge , phys . lett . * 84 * , 5856 ( 2000 ) . m. braden , m. meven , w. reichardt , l. pintschovius , m. t. fernandez - diaz , g. heger , f. nakamura , and t. fujita , phys . b * 63 * , 140510 ( 2001 ) . a. bianconi , n. l. saini , a. lanzara , m. missori , t. r. h. oyanagi , h. yamaguchi , k. oka , and t. ito , phys lett . * 76 * , 3412 ( 1996 ) ; a. lanzara , n. l. saini , t. rossetti , a. bianconi , h. oyanagi , h. yamaguchi , and y. maeno , solid . state commun . * 97 * , 93 ( 1996 ) ; n. l. saini , a. lanzara , h. oyanagi , h. yamaguchi , k. oka , t. ito , and a. bianconi , phys . b * 55 * , 12759 ( 1997 ) . a. v. fedorov , t. valla , p. d. johnson , q. li , g. d. gu , and , n. koshizuka , phys . lett . * 82 * , 2179 ( 1999 ) ; a. ino , c. kim , t. mizokawa , z. x. shen , a. fujimori , m. takaba , k. tamasaku , h. eisaki , and s. uchida , j. phys . . jpn . * 68 * , 1496 ( 1999 ) ; t. valla , a. v. fedorov , p. d. johnson , b. o. wells , s. l. hulbert , q. li , g. d. gu , and n. koshizuka , science * 285 * , 2110 ( 1999 ) ; p. j. white , z. x. shen , d. l. feng , c. kim , m. z. hasan , j. m. harris , a. g. loeser , h. ikeda , r. yoshikazi , g. d. gu , and n. koshizuka , preprint cond - mat/9901349 . x. j. zhou , p. bogdanov , s. a. kellar , t. noda , h. eisaki , s. uchida , z. hussain , z .- x . shen , science * 286 * , 268 ( 1999 ) . x. j. zhou , t. yoshida , s. a. kellar , p. v. bogdanov , e. d. lu , a. lanzara , m. nakamura , t. noda , t. kakeshita , h. eisaki , s. uchida , a. fujimori , _ et al . 86 * , 5578 ( 2001 ) . j. c. campuzano , m. r. norman , and m. randeria , in _ physic of conventional and unconventional superconductors _ , edited by k. h. bennemann , and j. b. ketterson ( springer , berlin , 2003 ) . a. damascelli , a. z. hussain , and z .- x . shen , rev . phys . * 75 * , 473 ( 2003 ) . m. ichioka , and k. machida , j. phys . . jpn . * 68 * , 4020 ( 1999 ) . m. fleck , a.i . lichtenstein , e. pavarini , and a. m. ole , phys . * 84 * , 4962 ( 2000 ) ; m. fleck , a.i . lichtenstein , and a. m. ole , phys . b * 64 * , 134528 ( 2001 ) . r. s. markiewicz , phys . b * 62 * , 1252 ( 2000 ) ; p. wrbel , and r. eder , phys . rev . b * 62 * , 4048 ( 2000 ) . p. wrbel , and r. eder , int . b * 14 * , 3759 ( 2000 ) . m. g. zacher , r. eder , e. e. arrigoni , and w. hanke , phys . lett . * 85 * , 2585 ( 2000 ) . e. w. carlson , d. orgad , s. a. kivelson , and v. j. emery , phys . b * 62 * , 3422 ( 2001 ) . j. eroles , g. ortiz , a. v. balatsky , and a. r. bishop , phys . b * 64 * , 174510 ( 2001 ) . m. granath , v. oganesyan , s. a. kivelson , e. fradkin , and v. j. emery , phys . lett . * 87 * , 167011 ( 2001 ) ; g .- h . gweon , j. d. denlinger , j. w. allen , r. claesson , c. g. olson , h. hoechst , j. marcus , c. schlenker , and l. f. schneemeyer , j. electron spectrosc . relat . phenom . * 117 - 118 * , 481 ( 2001 ) ; d. orgad , s. a. kivelson , e. w. carlson , v. j. emery , x. j. zhou , and z. x. shen , phys . lett . * 86 * , 4362 ( 2001 ) . m. granath , v. oganesyan , d. orgad , and s. a. kivelson , phys . b * 65 * , 184501 ( 2002 ) . m. g. zacher , r. eder , e. e. arrigoni , and w. hanke , phys . b * 65 * , 045109 ( 2002 ) . e. w. carlson , v. j. emery , s. a. kivelson , and d. orgad , in _ the physics of conventional and unconventional superconductors _ , edited by k. h. bennemann , and j. b. ketterson ( springer , berlin , 2003 ) ; m. granath , preprint cond - mat/0401063 . a. ino , c. kim , m. nakamura , t. yoshida , t. mizokawa , a. fujimori , t. kakeshita , h. eisaki , and s. uchida , phys . b * 62 * , 4137 ( 2000 ) . m. i. salkola , v. j. emery , and s. a. kivelson , phys . lett * 77 * , 155 ( 1996 ) . anderson , science * 235 * , 1196 ( 1987 ) ; d. s. rokshar , and s. a. kivelson , phys . 61 * , 2376 ( 1988 ) ; t. dombre , and g. kotliar , phys . b * 39 * , 855 ( 1989 ) ; e. fradkin , and s. a. kivelson , mod . phys b * 4 * , 225 ( 1990 ) ; n. read , and s. sachdev , phys . b * 42 * , 4568 ( 1990 ) ; s. sachdev , and n. read , phys . rev . lett . * 77 * , 4800 ( 1996 ) ; n. read , and s. sachdev , nucl . b * 316 * , 609 ( 1998 ) ; m. vojta , and s. sachdev , phys . * 83 * , 3916 ( 1999 ) ; e. altman , and a. auerbach , phys . b * 65 * , 104508 ( 2002 ) ; s. sachdev , and k. park , ann . phys . ( n.y . ) * 298 * , 58 ( 2002 ) ; m. vojta , phys . b * 66 * , 104505 ( 2002 ) ; s. sachdev , rev . phys . * 75 * , 913 ( 2003 ) . r. eder , and y. ohta , phys . b * 69 * , 094433 ( 2004 ) . r. eder , and y. ohta , phys . b * 69 * , 100502(r ) ( 2004 ) . s. m hayden , h. a. mook , p. dai , t. g. perring , and f. doan , nature * 429 * , 531 ( 2004 ) ; j. m. tranquada , h. woo , t. g. perring , h. goka , g. d. gu , g. xu , m. fujita , and k. yamada , nature * 429 * , 534 ( 2004 ) . p.wrbel , a. maciag , and r. eder , preprint cond - mat/0408578 . a. l. chernyshev , a. h. castro neto , and a. r. bishop , phys . lett . * 84 * , 4922 ( 2000 ) ; a. l. chernyshev , s.r . white , and a. h. castro neto , phys . b * 65 * , 214527 ( 2002 ) . k. w. becker , r.eder , and h. won , phys . b * 45 * , 4864 ( 1992 ) . r. eder , phys . b * 57 * , 12832 ( 1998 ) . c. jurecka and w. brenig phys . rev . b * 61 * , 14307 ( 2000 ) ; w. brenig , and k. w. becker , phys . rev . b * 64 * , 214413 ( 2001 ) ; c. hess , c. baumann , u. ammerahl , b. bchner , f. heidrich - meisner , w. brenig , and a. revcolevschi , phys . rev . b * 64 * , 184305 ( 2001 ) ; c. jurecka , and w. brenig , phys . rev . b * 63 * , 094409 ( 2001 ) ; f. heidrich - meisner , a. honecker , d. c. cabra , and w. brenig , phys . rev . b * 68 * , 134436 ( 2003 ) . chernyshev , and r.f . wood , in _ models and methods of high - tc superconductivity : some frontal aspects _ , vol . 1 , edited by j. k. srivastava and s. m. rao ( nova science publishers , inc . , hauppauge ny , 2003 ) ; and refererences therein . bulaevskii , e.l . nagaev , and d.i . khomskii , zh . . fiz . * 54 * , 1562 ( 1968 ) ; w. f. brinkman and t. m. rice , phys . b * 2 * , 1324 ( 1970 ) ; c. l. kane , p. a. lee , and n. read , phys . b * 39 * , 6880 ( 1988 ) ; f. marsiglio , a. e. ruckenstein , s. schmitt - rink , and c. m. varma , phys . rev . b * 43 * 10882 ( 1991 ) ; s. schmitt - rink , c. m. varma , and a. e. ruckenstein , phys . lett . * 60 * , 2793 ( 1988 ) ; b. shraiman , and e. siggia , phys . lett . * 60 * , 740 ( 1988 ) ; s. trugman , phys . b * 37 * , 1597 ( 1988 ) , * 41 * , 892 ( 1990 ) ; see also j. r. schrieffer , x .- g . wen , and s .- c . zhang , phys . lett . * 60 * , 944 ( 1988 ) ; p. bran , d. poilblanc , and r.b . laughlin , nucl . b * 473 * , 707 ( 1996 ) ; r. b. laughlin , phys . rev . lett . * 79 * , 1726 ( 1997 ) . a. ino , c. kim , m. nakamura , t. yoshida , t. mizokawa , a. fujimori , z .- x . shen , t. kakeshita , h. eisaki , and s. uchida , phys . b * 65 * , 094504 ( 2002 ) . r. eder , and k. w. becker , phys . b * 44 * , 6982 ( 1991 ) ; r. eder and k. w. becker , z. phys . b * 78 * , 219 ( 1990 ) ; r. eder , k. w. becker and w. stephan , z. phys . b * 81 * , 33 ( 1990 ) . t. tohyama , s. nagai , y. shibata , and s. maekawa , phys . lett . * 82 * , 4910 ( 1999 ) ; t. tohyama , s. maekawa , supercond . * 13 * , r17 ( 2000 ) . b. o. wells , z .- x . shen , a. matsuura , d. m. king , m. a. kastner , m. greven , and r. j. birgeneau , phys . lett . * 74 * , 964 ( 1995 ) a. bansil and r.s . markiewicz ( private communication ) . Abstract:
[ "the electronic structure and the single - particle spectral density of a stripe array formed by ladder - like domain walls ( dws ) and by antiferromagnetic ( af ) domains of width 2 lattice spacings are computed and compared with arpes spectra from some doped cuprates belonging to the 214 family of compounds . we assume that bond order is formed on legs in dws and that the phase of the sublattice magnetization changes by @xmath0 across each dw . the intensity map plotted in the coordination frame momentum - energy reproduces quite well the arpes spectra obtained at the doping level of @xmath1 . we consider this agreement as an argument for a scenario of coexisting bond - ordered regions and af regions in the stripe phase of moderately doped cuprates ." ]
13,752
13,752
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: given the current landscape in experimental high - energy physics , these lectures are focused on applications of event generators for hadron colliders like the tevatron and lhc . much of it would also be relevant for @xmath0 machines like lep and ilc or @xmath1 machines like hera , but with some differences not discussed here . heavy - ion physics is not at all addressed , since it involves rather different aspects , specifically the potential formation of a quark gluon plasma . further , within the field of high - energy @xmath2 collisions , the emphasis will be on the common aspects of qcd physics that occurs in all collisions , rather on those aspect that are specific to a particular physics topic , such as @xmath3 production or supersymmetry . both heavy ions and other physics topics are instead covered by other lectures at this school . section 2 contains a first overview of the physics picture and the generator landscape . thereafter section 3 describes the usage of matrix elements , section 4 the important topics of initial- and final - state showers , and section 5 how showers can be matched to different hard processes . the issue of multiple interactions and their role in mimimum - bias and underlying - event physics is introduced in section 6 , followed by some brief comments on hadronization in section 7 . the article concludes with an outlook on the ongoing generator - development work in section 8 . slides for these and other similar lectures @xcite are complementary to this writeup in style and contents , including many ( colour ) illustrations absent here . other useful resources include the `` les houches guidebook to monte carlo generators for hadron collider physics '' @xcite and a recent review on qcd physics at the tevatron and lhc @xcite . in real life , machines produce events that are stored by the data acquisition system of a detector . in the virtual reality , event generators like herwig @xcite and pythia @xcite play the role of machines like the tevatron and lhc , and detector simulation programs like geant 4 @xcite the role of detectors like atlas or cms . the real and virtual worlds can share the same event reconstruction framework and subsequent physics analysis . it is by understanding how an original physics input is distorted step - by - step in the better - controlled virtual world that an understanding can be gained of what may be going on in the real world . for approximate studies the detector simulation and reconstruction steps can be shortcut , so that generators can be used directly in the physics studies . a number of physics analyses would not be feasible without generators . specifically , a proper understanding of the ( potential ) signal and background processes is important to separate the two . the key aspect of generators here is that they provide a detailed description of the final state so that , ideally , any experimental observable or combination of observables can be predicted and compared with data . thereby generators can be used at various stages of an experiment : when optimizing the detector and its trigger design to the intended physics program , when estimating the feasibility of a specific physics study , when devising analysis strategies , when evaluating acceptance corrections , and so on . however , it should always be kept in mind that generators are not perfect . they suffer from having to describe a broad range of physics , some of which is known from first principles , while other parts are modelled in different frameworks . ( in the latter case , a generator actually acts as a vehicle of ideology , where ideas are disseminated in prepackaged form from theorists to experimentalists . ) given the limited resources , different authors may also have invested more or less time on specific physics topics , and therefore these may be more or less well modelled . it always pays to shop around , and to compare several approaches before drawing too definite conclusions . blind usage of a generator is not encouraged : then you are the slave rather than the master . why then _ monte carlo _ event generators ? basically because einstein was wrong : god does throw dice ! in quantum meachanics , calculations provide the _ probability _ for different outcomes of a measurement . event - by - event , it is impossible to know beforehand what will happen : anything that is at all allowed could be next . it is only when averaging over large event samples that the expected probability distributions emerge provided we did the right calculation to high enough accuracy . in generators , ( pseuo)random numbers are used to make choices intended to reproduce the quantum mechanical probabilities for different outcomes at various stages of the process . the buildup of the structure in an event occurs in several steps , and can be summarized as follows : * initially two hadrons are coming in on a collision course . each hadron can be viewed as a bag of partons quarks and gluons . * a collision between two partons , one from each side , gives the hard process of interest , be it for physics within or beyond the standard model : @xmath4 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 , etc . ( actually , the bulk of the cross section results in rather mundane events , with at most rather soft jets , or of a simple elastic or diffractive character that is not easily described as partonic processes . such events usually are filtered away at an early stage , however . ) * when short - lived `` resonances '' are produced in the hard process , such as the top , @xmath7 or @xmath8 , their decay has to be viewed as part of this process itself , since e.g. spin correlations are transferred from the production to the decay stages . * a collision implies accelerated colour ( and often electromagnetic ) charges , and thereby bremsstrahlung can occur . emissions that can be associated with the two incoming colliding partons are called initial - state radiation ( isr ) . as we shall see , such emissions can be modelled by so - called space - like parton showers . * emissions that can be associated with outgoing partons are instead called final - state radiation ( fsr ) , and can be approximated be time - like parton showers . often the distinction between a hard process and isr and fsr is ambiguous , as we shall see . * so far we only extracted one parton from each incoming hadron to undergo a hard collision . but the hadron is made up of a multitude of further partons , and so further parton pairs may collide within one single hadron hadron collision multiple interactions ( mi ) . ( not to be confused with pileup events , when several hadron pairs collide during a bunch bunch crossing , but with obvious analogies . ) * each of these further collisions also may be associated with its isr and fsr . * the colliding partons take a fraction of the energy of the incoming hadrons , but much of the energy remains in the beam remnants , which continue to travel essentially in the original directions . these remnants also carry colours that compensate the colour taken away by the colliding partons . * at short timescales , when partons are close to each other , the principle of asymptotic freedom tells us that we can think of each parton as freely moving along its trajectory . however , as time goes by and the partons recede from each other , confinement forces become significant . the structure and time evolution of these force fields can not be described from first principles within any calculational technique currently at our disposal , so models have to be introduced . one common approach is to assume that a separate confinement field is stretched between each colour and its matching anticolour , with each gluon considered as a simple sum of a colour and an anticolour , and all colours distinguishable from each other ( the @xmath9 limit ) . * such fields can break up by the production of new quark antiquark pairs that screen the endpoint colours , and where a quark from one break ( or from an endpoint ) can combine with an antiquark from an adjacent break to produce a primary hadron . this process is called hadronization . * many of those primary hadrons are unstable and decay further at various timescales . some are sufficiently long lived that their decays are visible in a detector , or are ( almost ) stable . thereby we have reached scales where the event - generator description has to be matched to a detector - simulation framework . * it is only at this stage that experimental information can be obtained and used to reconstruct back what may have happened at the core of the process , e.g. whether a higgs particle was produced or not . the monte carlo method allows these steps to be considered sequentially , and within each step to define a set of rules that can be used iteratively to construct a more and more complex state , maybe ending with hundreds of particles moving out in different directions . since each particle contains of the order of ten degrees of freedom ( flavour , mass , momentum , production vertex , lifetime , ) we realize that thousands of choices are involved for a typical event . the aim is to have a sufficiently realistic description of these choices that both the average behaviour and the fluctuations around this average are well decribed . schematically , the cross section for a range of final states is provided by @xmath10 properly integrated over the relevant phase - space regions and summed over possible `` paths '' ( of showering , hadronization , etc . ) that lead from a hard process to the final state . that is , the dimensional quantities are associated with the hard process ; subsequent steps are handled in a probabilistic approach . the spectrum of event generators is very broad , from general - purpose ones to more specialized ones . herwig and pythia are the two most commonly used among the former ones , with isajet @xcite and sherpa @xcite as the other two main programs in this category . among more specialized programs , many deal with the matrix elements for some specific set of processes , a few with topics such as parton showers or particle decays , but there are e.g. no freestanding programs that handle hadronization . in the end , many of the specialized programs are therefore used as `` plugins '' for the general - purpose ones . from the lagrangian of a theory the feynman rules can be derived , and from them matrix elements can be calculated . combined with phase space it allows the calculation of cross sections . as a simple example consider the scattering of quarks in qcd , say @xmath11 , a process similar to rutherford scattering but with gluon exchange instead of photon ditto . the mandelstam variables are defined as @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath14 . in the cm frame of the collision @xmath15 is the squared total energy and @xmath16 where @xmath17 is the scattering angle . the differential cross section is then @xmath18 which diverges roughly like @xmath19 for transverse momentum @xmath20 . we will come back to this issue when discussing multiple interactions ; for now suffice to say that some lower cutoff @xmath21 need to be introduced . similar cross sections , differing mainly by colour factors , are obtained for @xmath22 and @xmath23 . a few further qcd graphs , like @xmath24 , are less singular and give smaller contributions . these cross sections then have to be convoluted with the flux of the incoming partons @xmath25 and @xmath26 in the two incoming hadrons @xmath27 and @xmath3 : @xmath28 the parton density functions ( pdfs ) of gluons and sea quarks are strongly peaked at small momentum fractions @xmath29 , @xmath30 . this further enhances the peaking of the cross section at small @xmath31 values . nevertheless , with high machine luminosity the jet cross section can be studied out to quite high values . the cross section of other processes can be suppressed by two main effects . firstly , for massive particles the @xmath31 spectrum is strongly dampened below the respective mass scale , and it is only above it that these precesses have a chance to stand up above the qcd background . secondly , the processes may involve electroweak ( or other small ) couplings rather than strong ones . in order to address the physics of interest a large number of processes , both within the standard model and in various extensions of it , have to be available in generators . indeed many can also be found in the general - purpose ones , but by far not enough . further , often processes are there available only to lowest order , while experimental interest may be in higher orders , with more jets in the final state , either as a signal or as a potential background . so a wide spectrum of matrix - element - centered programs are available @xcite , some quite specialized and others more generic . ( 320,210)(0,0 ) ( 100,185)(220,205 ) ( 160,195)[]process selection ( 100,165)(220,185 ) ( 160,175)[]resonance decays ( 160,165)(160,152 ) ( 100,130)(220,150 ) ( 160,140)[]parton showers ( 100,110)(220,130 ) ( 160,120)[]multiple interactions ( 100,90)(220,110 ) ( 160,100)[]beam remnants ( 160,90)(160,77 ) ( 100,55)(220,75 ) ( 160,65)[]hadronization ( 100,35)(220,55 ) ( 160,45)[]ordinary decays ( 160,35)(160,22 ) ( 100,0)(220,20)(160,10)[]detector simulation ( 0,185)(80,205 ) ( 40,195)[]me generator ( 40,185)(40,172 ) ( 0,150)(80,170 ) ( 40,160)[]me expression ( 80,165)(98,195 ) ( 80,160)(98,180 ) ( 0,85)(80,135 ) ( 40,125)[]susy/ ( 40,110)[]spectrum ( 40,96)[]calculation ( 40,135)(40,148 ) ( 80,125)(98,170 ) ( 240,170)(320,205 ) ( 280,195)[]phase space ( 280,180)[]generation ( 230,195)(238,190 ) ( 230,195)(222,200 ) ( 240,115)(320,135 ) ( 280,125)[]pdf library ( 240,130)(222,190 ) ( 240,125)(222,140 ) ( 240,120)(222,120 ) ( 240,60)(320,80 ) ( 280,70)[]@xmath32 decays ( 240,70)(222,50 ) ( 240,25)(320,45 ) ( 280,35)[]@xmath3 decays ( 240,35)(222,40 ) ( 100,28.75)(13.75,270,90)5 ( 100,33.75)(28.75,270,90)5 ( 80,155)(98,120 ) the way these programs can be combined with a general - purpose generator is illustrated in fig . [ fig : combgen ] . in the study of supersymmetry ( susy ) it is customary to define a model in terms of a handful parameters , e.g. specified at some large grand unification scale . it is then the task of a spectrum calculator to turn this into a set of masses , mixings and couplings for the physical states to be searched for . separately , the matrix elements can be calculated with these properties as unknown parameters , and only when the two are combined is it possible to speak of physically relevant matrix - element expressions . these matrix elements now need to be combined with pdf s and sampled in phase space , preferable with some preweighting procedure so that regions of phase space with high cross sections are sampled more frequently . the primarily - produced susy particles typically are unstable and undergo sequential decays down to a lightest supersymmetric particle ( lsp ) , again with branching ratios and angular distributions that should be properly modelled . the lsp would be neutral and escape undetected , while other decay products would be normal quarks and leptons . it is at this stage that general - purpose programs take over . they describe the showering associated with the above process , the presence of additional interactions in the same hadron hadron collision , the structure of beam remnants , and the hadronization and decays . they would still rely on the externally supplied pdf s , and potentially make use of programs dedicated to @xmath32 and @xmath3 decays , where spin information and form factors require special encoding . even after the event has been handed on to the detector - simulation program some parts of the generator may be used in the simulation of secondary interactions and decays . several standards have been developed to further this interoperability . the les houches accord ( lha ) for user processes @xcite specifies how parton - level information about the hard process and sequential decays can be encoded and passed on to a general - purpose generator . originally it was defined in terms of two fortran commonblocks , but more recently a standard les houches event file format @xcite offfers a language - independent alternative approach . the les houches accord parton density functions ( lhapdf ) library @xcite makes different pdf sets available in a uniform framework . the susy les houches accord ( slha ) @xcite allows a standardized transfer of masses , mixings , couplings and branching ratios from spectrum calculators to other programs . finally , the hepmc c++ event record @xcite succeeds the hepevt fortran one @xcite as a standard way to transfer information from a generator on to the detector - simulation stage . one of the key building blocks for several of these standards is the pdg codes for all the most common particles @xcite , also in some scenarios for physics beyond the standard model . the @xmath33 processes we started out with above are about the simplest one can imagine at a hadron collider . in reality one needs to go on to higher orders . in @xmath34 two new kind of graphs one kind is where one additional parton is present in the final state , i.e. @xmath35 processes . the cross section for such processes is almost always divergent when one of the parton energies vanish ( soft singularities ) or two partons become collinear ( collinear singularities ) . the other kind is loop graphs , with an additional intermediate parton not present in the final state , i.e. a correction to the @xmath33 processes . strictly speaking , at @xmath34 one picks up the interference between the lowest - order graph and the loop graph , and this interference has negative divergences that exactly cancel the positive ones above , with only finite terms surviving . for inclusive event properties such next - to - leading order ( nlo ) calculations lead to an improved accuracy of predictions , but for more exclusive studies the mathematical cancellation of singularities has to be supplemented by more physical techniques , which is far from trivial . the tricky part of the calculations is the virtual corrections . nlo is now state - of - the - art , with nnlo still in its infancy . if one is content with born - level diagrams only , i.e. without any loops , it is possible to go to quite high orders , with up to something like eight partons in the final state . these partons have to be kept well separated to avoid the phase - space regions where the divergences become troublesome . in order to cover also regions where partons become soft / colliner we therefore next turn our attention to parton showers . to iterate , the emission rate for a branching such as @xmath36 diverges when the gluon either becomes collinear with the quark or when the gluon energy vanishes . the qcd pattern is similar to that for @xmath37 in qed , except with a larger coupling , and actually a coupling that also increases for smaller relative @xmath31 in a branching , thereby further enhancing the divergence . furthermore the non - abelian character of qcd leads to @xmath38 branchings with similar divergences , without any correspondence in qed . the third main branching , @xmath39 with its @xmath40 qed equivalence , does not have the soft divergence and is less important . now , if the rate for one emission of a gluon is big , then also the rate for two or more will be big , and thus the need for high orders and many loops in matrix - element - based descriptions . with showers we introduce two new concepts that make like easier , + ( 1 ) an iterative structure that allows simple expressions for @xmath36 , @xmath38 and @xmath39 branchings to be combined to build up complex multiparton final states , and + ( 2 ) a sudakov factor that offers a physical way to handle the cancellation between real and virtual divergences . + neither of the simplifications is exact , but together they allow us to provide sensible approximate answers for the structure of emissions in soft and collinear regions of phase space . ( 240,160)(0,-10 ) ( 20,20)(100,60)(15,20)[r]@xmath41 ( 20,140)(100,100)(15,140)[r]@xmath42 ( 100,60)(100,100)45 ( 100,60)(180,20)(185,20)[l]@xmath41 ( 100,100)(180,140)(185,140)[l]@xmath42 ( 100,80)(35,0,355)5 ( 115,80)[]@xmath43 ( 100,-10)[]@xmath33 ( 50,35)(100,20)46 ( 50,50)(68,45)(45,50)[r]@xmath44 ( 50,125)(100,140)46 ( 50,110)(68,115)(45,110)[r]@xmath45 ( 50,-10)[]isr ( 140,40)(190,55)46 ( 130,27)(130,43)(130,22)[t]@xmath46 ( 140,120)(190,105)46 ( 130,133)(130,117)(130,138)[b]@xmath47 ( 150,-10)[]fsr the starting point is to `` factorize '' a complex @xmath48 process , where @xmath49 represents a large number of partons in the final state , into a simple core process , maybe @xmath33 , convoluted with showers , fig . [ fig : factorize ] . to begin with , in a simple @xmath50 process the incoming and outgoing quarks must be on the mass shell , i.e. satisfy @xmath51 , at long timescales . by the uncertainty principle , however , the closer one comes to the hard interaction , i.e the shorter the timescales considered , the more off - shell the partons may be . ( in the oldfashioned perturbative language particles were always on mass - shell , and the uncertainty relation allowed energy not to be conserved temporarily . in the modern feynman - graph language four - momentum is conserved at each vertex , but intermediate `` propagator '' particles need not be on the mass shell . the final physics is the same in both languages . ) thus the incoming quarks may radiate a succession of harder and harder gluons , while the outgoing ones radiate softer and softer gluons . one definition of hardness is how off - shell the quarks are , @xmath52 , but we will encounter other variants later . in the initial - state radiation ( isr ) part of the cascade these virtualities are spacelike , @xmath53 , hence the alternative name spacelike showers . correspondingly the final - state radiation ( fsr ) is characterized by timelike virtualities , @xmath54 , and hence also called timelike showers . to see where this distinction comes from , consider the kinematics of an arbitrary branching @xmath55 , with @xmath56 defined to be moving along the @xmath57 axis . then it is useful to introduce lightcone momenta @xmath58 , so that the relation @xmath59 translates to @xmath60 . now define the splitting of @xmath61 by @xmath62 and @xmath63 . obviously @xmath64 so @xmath65 . remains to ensure conservation of @xmath66 : @xmath67 in an initial - state branching the incoming @xmath56 should be ( essentially ) massless , and if @xmath68 does not interact any further it should also be massless . this gives @xmath69 , a virtuality that is acceptable if @xmath70 is on its way in to a hard scattering , i.e.is destined only to live for a short while . in isr the @xmath71 virtualities , such as @xmath45 and @xmath44 in fig . [ fig : factorize ] , are usually defined as @xmath72 to keep them positive definite . for a final - state branching , assume that @xmath70 and @xmath68 will not branch any further and thus are massless , while @xmath56 is an intermediate particle coming from the hard interaction . then @xmath73 , cf . @xmath47 and @xmath46 in fig . [ fig : factorize ] , here with @xmath74 . the cross section for the whole @xmath48 graph is associated with the cross section of the hard subprocess , with the approximation that the other @xmath71 virtualities can be neglected in the matrix - element expression . in the limit that all the @xmath75 this should be a good approximation . in other words , first the hard process can be picked without any reference to showers , and only thereafter are showers added with unit probability . but , of course , the showers do modify the event shape , so at the end of the day the cross section is affected . for instance , the total transverse energy @xmath76 of an event is increased by isr , so the cross sections of events with a given @xmath76 is increased by the influx of events that started out with a lower @xmath76 in the hard process . it is important that the hard - process scale @xmath43 is picked to be the largest one , i.e. @xmath77 in fig . [ fig : factorize ] . if e.g. @xmath78 then instead the @xmath4 subgraph ought to be chosen as hard process , and the gluon of virtuality @xmath43 ought to be part of the isr off the incoming @xmath41 . without such a criterion one might doublecount a given graph , or even count it once for every possible subgraph inside the complete @xmath48 graph . in addition , the approximation of neglecting virtualities in the hard - scattering matrix elements obviously becomes worse the more the incoming and outgoing partons are off - shell , another reason not to put a larger scale than necessary in the shower part . ( 180,90)(0,-50 ) ( 0,0)(40,0)44(20,15)[]0 ( 40,0)(110,-40)(120,-40)[l]@xmath79 ( 1 ) ( 110,40)(40,0)(120,40)[l]@xmath80 ( 2 ) ( 55,-18)[]@xmath25 ( 75,-20)(110,-10)44(120,-10)[l]@xmath81 ( 3 ) ( 70,-50)[](a ) ( 150,90)(0,-50 ) ( 0,0)(40,0)44(20,15)[]0 ( 40,0)(110,-40)(120,-40)[l]@xmath79 ( 1 ) ( 110,40)(40,0)(120,40)[l]@xmath80 ( 2 ) ( 55,18)[]@xmath25 ( 75,20)(110,10)44(120,10)[l]@xmath81 ( 3 ) ( 70,-50)[](b ) let us next turn to a more detailed presentation of the showering approach , and begin with the simpler final - state stage . this is most cleanly studied in the process @xmath82 . the first - order correction here corresponds to the emission of one additional gluon , by either of the two feynman graphs in fig . [ fig : qqg ] . neglect quark masses and introduce energy fractions @xmath83 in the rest frame of the process . then the cross section is of the form @xmath84 where @xmath85 is the @xmath86 cross section , i.e.without the gluon emission . now study the kinematics in the limit @xmath87 . since @xmath88 we see that this corresponds to the `` collinear region '' , where the separation between the @xmath79 and @xmath81 vanishes . equivalently , the virtuality @xmath89 of the intermediate quark propagator @xmath25 in fig . [ fig : qqg]a vanishes . although the full answer contains contributions from both graphs it is obvious that , in this region , the amplitude of the one in fig . [ fig : qqg]a dominates over the one in fig . [ fig : qqg]b . we can therefore view the process as @xmath90 followed by @xmath36 . define the energy sharing in the latter branching by @xmath91 and @xmath92 . the kinematics relations then are @xmath93 so that @xmath94 here @xmath95 corresponds to the `` collinear '' or `` mass '' singularity and @xmath96 to the soft - gluon singularity . the interesting aspect of eq . ( [ eq : pqtoqg ] ) is that it is universal : whenever there is a massless quark in the final state , this equation provides the probability for the same final state except for the quark being replaced by an almost collinear @xmath97 pair ( plus some other slight kinematics adjustments to conserve overall energy and momentum ) . that is reasonable : in a general process any number of distinct feynman graphs may contribute and interfere in a nontrivial manner , but once we go to a collinear region only one specific graph will contribute , and that graphs always has the same structure , in this case with an intermediste quark propagator . corresponding rules can be derived for what happens when a gluon is replaced by a collinear @xmath98 or @xmath99 pair . these rules are summarized by the dglap equations @xcite @xmath100 furthermore , the rules can be combined to allow for the successive emission in several steps , e.g. where a @xmath36 branching is followed by further branchings of the daughters . that way a whole shower develops , fig . [ fig : fsrshower ] . ( 240,160)(-70,-80 ) ( -60,0)(0,0)46 ( 0,0)(160,80 ) ( 0,0)(160,-80 ) ( 32,-16)(80,-8)45 ( 80,-8)(160,-16)48(80,-8)(160,0)48 ( 64,-32)(112,-40)45 ( 112,-40)(160,-32)45(112,-40)(160,-48)45 ( 96,-48)(160,-64)47 ( 48,24)(96,24)45 ( 96,24)(160,16)(96,24)(160,32 ) ( 80,40)(160,48)48 ( 120,60)(160,64)44 such a picture should be reliable in cases where the emissions are strongly ordered , i.e. @xmath101 . showers would not be useful if they only could be applied to strongly - ordered parton configurations , however . a further study of the @xmath102 example shows that the simple sum of the @xmath36 and @xmath103 branchings reproduce the full matrix elements , with interference included , to better than a factor of 2 over the full phase space . this is one of the simpler cases , and of course one should expect the accuracy to be worse for more complicated final states . nevertheless , it is meaningful to use the shower over the whole strictly - ordered , but not necessarily strongly - ordered , region @xmath104 to obtain an approximate answer for multiparton topologies for which the complete matrix elements would be too lengthy . with the parton - shower approach , the big probability for one branching @xmath105 turns into a big probability for several successive branchings . nevertheless we did not tame the fact that probabilities blow up in the soft and collinear regions . for sure , perturbation theory will cease to be meaningful at so small @xmath43 scales that @xmath106 diverges ; there confimenent effects and hadronization phenomena take over . typically therefore some lower cutoff at around 1 gev is used to regulate both soft and collinear divergences : below such a scale no further branchings are simulated . whatever perturbative effects may remain are effectively pushed into the parameters of the nonperturbative framework . that way we avoid the singularities , but we can still have `` probabilities '' well above unity , which does not seem to make sense . this brings us to the second big concept of this section , the _ sudakov ( form ) factor _ @xcite . in the context of particle physics it has a specific meaning related to the properties of the loop diagrams , but more generally we can just see it as a consequence of the conservation of total probability @xmath107 where the former is multiplicative in a time - evolution sense : @xmath108 now subdivide further , with @xmath109 , @xmath110 : @xmath111 \longrightarrow ~~ \mathrm{d}\mathcal{p}_{\mathrm{first}}(t ) & = & \mathrm{d}\mathcal{p}_{\mathrm{something}}(t ) \ ; \exp \left ( - \int_0^t \frac{\mathrm{d } \mathcal{p}_{\mathrm{something}}(t)}% { \mathrm{d } t } \mathrm{d } t \right ) ~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] that is , the probability for something to happen for the _ first _ time at time @xmath112 is the naive probability for this to happen , _ times _ the probability that this did not yet happen . as such it applies to a host of situations . take the example of football ( relevant at the time of the school ) . assume that players are equally energetic and skillful from the first minute of the match to the last . then the chances of scoring a goal is uniform in time , but the probability of scoring the _ first _ goal of the match is bigger at the beginning , because later on any goal could well be the second or third . in physics a common example is that of radioactive decay . if the number of undecayed radioactive nuclei at time @xmath113 is @xmath114 , with initial number @xmath115 at time @xmath116 , then a naive ansatz would be @xmath117 , where @xmath68 parametrizes the decay likelihood per unit of time . this equation has the solution @xmath118 , which becomes negative for @xmath119 , because by then the probability for having had a decay exceeds unity . so what we made wrong was not to take into account that only an undecayed nucleus can decay , i.e. that the equation ought to have been @xmath120 with the solution @xmath121 . this is a nicely well - behaved expression , where the total probability for decays goes to unity only for @xmath122 . if @xmath68 had not been a constant but varied in time , @xmath123 , it is simple to show that the solution instead would have become @xmath124 for a shower the relevant `` time '' scale is something like @xmath125 , by the heisenberg uncertainty principle . that is , instead of evolving to later and later times we evolve to smaller and smaller @xmath43 . thereby the dglap eq . ( [ eq : dglap ] ) becomes @xmath126 where the exponent ( or simple variants thereof ) is the sudakov factor . as for the radioactive - decay example above , the inclusion of a sudakov ensures that the total probability for a parton to branch never exceeds unity . then you may have sequential radioactive decay chains , and you may have sequential parton branchings , but that is another story . it is a bit deeper than that , however . just as the standard branching expressions can be viewed as approximations to the complete matrix elements for real emission , the sudakov is an approximation to the complete virtual corrections from loop graphs . the divergences in real and virtual emissions , so strange - looking in the matrix - element language , here naturally combine to provide a physical answer everywhere . what is not described in the shower , of course , is the non - universal finite parts of the real and virtual matrix elements . the implementation of a cascade evolution now makes sense . starting from a simple @xmath99 system the @xmath79 and @xmath80 are individually evolved downwards from some initial @xmath127 until they branch . at a branching the mother parton disappears and is replaced by two daughter partons , which in their turn are evolved downwards in @xmath43 and may branch . thereby the number of partons increases , until the lower cutoff scale is reached . this does not mean that everything is uniquely specified . in particular , the choice of evolving in @xmath128 is by no means obvious . any alternative variable @xmath129 would work equally well , since @xmath130 . alternative evolution variables therefore include the transverse momentum , @xmath131 , and the energy - weighted emission angle @xmath132 . both these two alternative choices are favourable when the issue of _ coherence _ is introduced . coherence means that emissions do not occur independently . for instance , consider @xmath133 , followed by an emission of a gluon either from 2 or 3 . when this gluon is soft it can not resolve the individual colour charges of @xmath134 and @xmath135 , but only the net charge of the two , which of course is the charge of @xmath136 . thereby the multiplication of partons in a shower is reduced relative to naive expectations . as it turns out , evolution in @xmath31 or angle automatically includes this reduction , while one in mass does not . in the study of fsr , e.g. at lep , three algorithms have been commonly used . the herwig angular - ordered and pythia mass - ordered ones are conventional parton showers as described above , while the ariadne @xcite @xmath31-ordered one is based on a picture of dipole emissions . that is , instead of considering @xmath137 one studies @xmath138 . one aspect of this is that , in addition to the branching parton , ariadne also explicitly includes a `` recoil parton '' needed for overall energy momentum conservation . additionally emissions off @xmath56 and @xmath70 are combined in a well - defined manner . all three approaches have advantages and disadvantages . as already mentioned , pythia does not inherently include coherence , but has to add that approximately by brute force . both pythia and herwig break lorentz invariance slightly . the herwig algorithm can not cover the full phase space with it emissions , but has to fill in some `` dead zones '' using higher - order matrix elements . the ariadne dipole picture does not include @xmath39 branchings in a natural way . and so on . when all is said and done , it turns out that all three algorithms do a quite decent job of describing lep data @xcite , but typically ariadne does best and herwig worst . since ariadne uses pythia for hadronization the difference between those two is entirely due to the shower algorithms , while comparisons with herwig also are complicated by significant differences in hadronization . the structure of initial - state radiation ( isr ) is more complicated than that of fsr , since the nontrivial structure of the incoming hadrons enter the game . a proton is made up out of three quarks , @xmath139 , plus the gluons that bind them together . this picture is not static , however : gluons are continuously emitted and absorbed by the quarks , and each gluon may in its turn temporarily split into two gluons or into a @xmath86 pair . thus a proton is teeming with activity , and much of it in a nonperturbative region where we can not calculate . we are therefore forced to introduce the concept of a parton density @xmath140 as an empirical distribution , describing the probability to find a parton of species @xmath70 in a hadron , with a fraction @xmath141 of the hadron energy momentum when the hadron is probed at a resolution scale @xmath43 . while @xmath140 itself can not be predicted , the change of @xmath142 with resolution scale can , once @xmath43 is large enough that perturbation theory should be applicable : @xmath143 this is actually nothing but our familiar dglap equations . before they were written in an exclusive manner : given a parton @xmath56 , what is the probability that it will branch to @xmath144 during a change @xmath145 ? here the formulation is instead inclusive : given that the probability distributions @xmath146 of all partons @xmath56 are known at a scale @xmath43 , how is the distribution of partons @xmath70 changed by the set of possible branchings @xmath147 ( @xmath148 , here implicit ) . the splitting kernels @xmath149 are the same to leading order , but differ between isr and fsr in higher orders . in higher orders also the concept of @xmath150 as a positive definite probability is lost , additional complications that we will not consider any further here . even though eqs . ( [ eq : dglap ] ) and ( [ eq : dglapisr ] ) are equivalent , the physics context is different . in fsr the outgoing partons have been kicked to large timelike virtualities by the hard process and then cascade downwards towards the mass shell . in isr we rather start out with a simple proton at early times and then allow more and more spacelike virtualities as we get closer to the hard interaction . not that big fluctuations could not happen at early times they do but if they happen too early the uncertainty relation does not allow them to live long enough to be of any intererest to us . that is , the higher the virtuality , the later the fluctuation has to occur . ( 420,120)(-10,-60 ) ( 0,0)(80,0 ) ( 80,0)(160,-10 ) ( 160,-10)(240,10 ) ( 240,10)(320,-20 ) ( 320,-20)(400,20 ) ( 395,15)(405,25 ) ( 395,25)(405,15 ) ( 80,0)(120,10 ) ( 120,10)(160,0)5 ( 120,10)(160,30)5 ( 160,30)(200,20)5 ( 160,30)(200,40)5 ( 160,-10)(200,-30 ) ( 200,-30)(240,-20)5 ( 240,-20)(280,-15)5 ( 240,-20)(280,-30)5 ( 200,-30)(240,-40)5 ( 240,-40)(280,-45)5 ( 240,-40)(280,-60)5 ( 240,10)(280,40 ) ( 280,40)(320,50)5 ( 280,40)(320,20)5 ( 320,20)(360,10)5 ( 320,20)(360,40)5 ( 360,40)(400,30)5 ( 360,40)(400,50)5 ( 320,-20)(350,-40 ) ( 350,-40)(400,-60)5 ( 350,-40)(380,-20)5 ( 380,-20)(400,-35)5 ( 380,-20)(400,-5)5 so , when the hard scattering occurs , in some sense the initial - state cascade is already there , as a virtual fluctuation . had no collision occured the fluctuation would have collapsed back , but now one of the partons of the fluctuation is kicked out in a quite different direction and can no longer recombine with its sister parton from its last branching , nor with its aunt from the last - but - one branching . and so on for each preceding branching in the cascade that lead up to this particular parton . post facto we therefore see that a chain of branchings with increasing @xmath43 values built up an isr shower , fig . [ fig : isrshower ] . the obvious way to simulate this situation would be to pick partons in the two incoming hadrons from parton densities at some low @xmath43 scale , and then use the exclusive formulation of eq . ( [ eq : dglap ] ) to construct a complete picture of partons available at higher @xmath43 scales , event by event . the two sets of incoming partons could then be weighted by the cross section for the process under study . a problem is that this may not be very efficient . we have to evolve for all possible fluctuations , but at best one particular parton will collide and most of the other fluctuations will collapse back . the cost may become prohibitive when the process of interest has a constrained phase space , like a light - mass higgs which has to have the colliding partons matched up in a very narrow mass bin . there are ways to speed up this `` forwards evolution '' approach . however , the most common solution is instead to adopt a `` backwards evolution '' point of view @xcite . here one starts at the hard interaction and then tries to reconstruct what happened `` before '' . to be more precise , the cross - section formula in eq . ( [ eq : sigma ] ) already includes the summation over all possible incoming shower histories by the usage of @xmath43-dependent parton densities . therefore what remains is to pick one exclusive shower history from the inclusive set that went into the @xmath43-evolution . to do this , recast eq . ( [ eq : dglapisr ] ) as @xmath151 then we have defined a _ conditional probability _ : if parton @xmath70 is present at scale @xmath43 , what is the probability that it will turn out to have come from a branching @xmath137 at some infinitesimally _ smaller _ scale ? ( recall that the original eq . ( [ eq : dglapisr ] ) was defined for increasing virtuality . ) like for fsr this expression has to be modified by a sudakov factor to preserve total probability , and this factor is again the exponent of the real - emission expression with a negative sign , integrated over @xmath43 from an upper starting scale @xmath127 down to the @xmath43 of the hypothetical branching . the approach is now clear . first a hard scattering is selected , making use of the @xmath43-evolved parton densities . then , with the hard process as upper maximum scale , a succession of isr branchings are reconstructed at lower and lower @xmath43 scales , going `` backwards in time '' towards the early low - virtuality initiators of the cascades . again some cutoff needs to be introduced when the nonperturbative regime is reached . unfortunately the story does not end there . for fsr we discussed the need to take into account coherence effects and the possibility to use different variables . such issues exist here as well , but also additional ones . for instance , evolution need not be strictly ordered in @xmath43 . ( eq . ( [ eq : ptkin ] ) only gives you @xmath152 , not @xmath153 . ) non - ordered chains in some cases can be important . another issue is that there can be so many partons evolving inside a hadron that they become close - packed , which leads to additional recombinations . see the lectures of g. ingelman for further details @xcite . in summary , isr and fsr share many aspects , but also differ . the dglap evolution with sudakov factors allows a simple probabilistic framework , where an initial parton undergoes successive branchings . for isr the branching ( usually ) is in terms of higher and higher spacelike virtualities as the hard scattering approaches , while for fsr the branchings involve lower and lower timelike virtualities as the hard scattering recedes . in fsr both daughter partons appear on equal footing , in that both can be timelike and branch further . in isr only the daughter parton on its way in to the hard scattering can be spacelike virtual ; its sister will become part of the final state and thus has to be on mass shell , or else be timelike and start an fsr shower of its own . and , last but not least , the whole fsr framework is considerably better understood than the isr one . as we have seen , both matrix elements ( me ) and parton showers ( ps ) have advantages and disadvantages . to recall , me allow a systematic expansion in powers of @xmath154 , and thereby offer a controlled approach towards higher precision . calculations can be done with several ( up to @xmath155 ) partons in the final state , so long as only born - level results are asked for , and it is possible to tailor the phase - space cuts for these partons precisely to the experimental needs . loop calculations are much more difficult , on the other hand , and the mathematically correct cancellation between real- and virtual - emission graphs in the soft / collinear regions is not physically sensible . therefore me can not be used to explore the internal structure of a jet , and are difficult to match to hadronization models , which are supposed to take over in the very soft / collinear region . ps , on the other hand , clearly are approximate and do not come with a guaranteed level of precision for well separated jets . you can not steer the probabilistic evolution of a shower too much , and therefore the efficiency for obtaining events in a specific region of phase space can be quite low . on the other hand , ps are universal , so for any new model you only need to provide the basic hard process and then ps will turn that into reasonably realistic multiparton topologies . the use of sudakov factors ensures a physically sensible behaviour in the soft / collinear regions , and it is also here that the ps formalism is supposed to be as most reliable . it is therefore possible to obtain a good picture of the internal structure of jets , and to provide a good match to hadronization models . in a nutshell : me are good for well separated jets , ps for the structure inside jets . clearly the two complement each other , and a marriage is highly desirable . to do this , without doublecounting or gaps in the phase space coverage , is less trivial , and several alternative approaches have been developed . in the following we will discuss three main options : merging , vetoed parton showers and mc@nlo , roughly ordered in increasing complexity . which of these to use may well depend on the task at hand . the aspiration of merging is to cover the whole phase space with a smooth transition from me to ps . the typical case would be a process where the lowest - order ( lo ) me is known , as well as the next - to - leading - order ( nlo ) real - emission one , say of an additional gluon . the shower should then reproduce @xmath156 starting from a lo topology . if the shower populates phase space according to @xmath157 this implies that a correction factor @xmath158 need to be applied . at first glance this does not apper to make sense : if all we do is get back @xmath159 , then what did we gain ? however , the trick is to recall that the ps formula comes in two parts : the real - emission answer and a sudakov factor that ensures total conservation of probability . what we have called @xmath157 above should only be the real - emission part of the story . it is also this one that we know _ will _ agree with @xmath159 in the soft and collinear regions . actually , with some moderate amount of effort it is often possible to ensure that @xmath158 is of order unity over the whole phase space , and to adjust the showers in the hard region so that the ratio always is below unity , i.e.so that standard monte carlo rejection techniques can be used . what the sudakov factor then does is introduce some ordering variable @xmath43 , so that the whole phase space is covered starting from `` hard '' emissions and moving to `` softer '' ones . at the end of the day this leads to a distribution over phase space like @xmath160 that is , we have used the ps choice of evolution variable to provide an exponentiated version of the me answer . as such it agrees with the me answer in the hard region , where the sudakov factor is close to unity , and with the ps in the soft / collinear regions , where @xmath161 . the method is especially convenient for resonance decays , such as @xmath82 where it was first introduced @xcite . in that case there is an added bonus : the full nlo answer , with virtual corrections included , is known to be @xmath162 . so it is trivial to use the procedure above and rescale everything by @xmath163 to obtain a complete nlo answer . note that the difference between using @xmath164 or @xmath165 in the denominator of eq . ( [ eq : wme ] ) only gives a difference to @xmath166 , i.e. to nnlo . in pythia this approach is used for essentially all resonance decays in the standard model and minimal supersymmetric extensions thereof : @xmath167 , @xmath168 , @xmath169 , @xmath170 , @xmath171 , it is also used in isr to describe @xmath172 @xcite , but here the nlo corrections are more tricky , so the cross section remains as provided by the lo number . merging is also used for several processes in herwig , such as @xmath90 , @xmath167 and @xmath172 @xcite . a special problem here is that the angular - ordered algorithms , both for fsr and for isr , leave some `` dead zones '' of hard emissions that are kinematically forbidden for the shower to populate . it is therefore necessary to start directly from higher - order matrix elements in these regions . a consistent treatment still allows a smooth joining across the boundary . in some sense vetoed parton showers is an extension of the merging approach above . the objective is still to combine the real - emission behaviour of me with the emission - ordering - variable - dependent sudakov factors of ps . while the merging approach only works for combining the lo and nlo expressions , however , the vetoed parton showers offer a generic approach for combining several different orders . therefore it is likely to be a standard tool for many studies in the future . to understand how the algorithm works , consider a lowest - order process such as @xmath173 . for each higher order one additional jet would be added to the final state , so long as only real - emission graphs are considered : in first order e.g.@xmath174 , in second order e.g.@xmath175 , and so on . call these ( differential ) cross sections @xmath85 , @xmath176 , @xmath177 , . it should then come as no surprise that each @xmath178 , @xmath179 , contains soft and collinear divergences . we therefore need to impose some set of me phase - space cuts , e.g. on invariant masses of parton pairs , or on parton energies and angular separation between them . when these cuts are varied , so that e.g. the mass or energy thresholds are lowered towards zero , all of these @xmath178 , @xmath179 , increase without bounds . however , in the me approach without virtual corrections there is no `` detailed balance '' , wherein the addition of cross section to @xmath180 is compensated by a depletion of @xmath178 . that is , if you have an event with @xmath25 jets at some resolution scale , and a lowering of the minimal jet energy reveals the presence of one additional jet , then you should reclassify the event from being @xmath25-jet to being @xmath181-jet . add one , subtract one , with no net change in @xmath182 . so the trick is to use the sudakovs of showers to ensure this detailed balance . of course , in a complete description the cancellation between real and virtual corrections is not completely exact but leaves a finite net contribution , which is not predicted in this approach . a few alternative algorithms exist along these lines . all share the three first steps as follows @xcite : + 1 ) pick a hard process within the me - cuts - allowed phase - space region , in proportions provided by the me integrated over the respective allowed region , @xmath183 . use for this purpose a fix @xmath184 larger than the @xmath154 values that will be used below . + 2 ) reconstruct an imagined shower history that describes how the event could have evolved from the lowest - order process to the actual final state . that provides an ordering of emissions by whatever shower - evolution variable is intended . + 3 ) the `` best - bet '' choice of @xmath154 scale in showers is known to be the squared transverse momentum of the respective branching . therefore a factor @xmath185 , provides the probability that the event should be retained . now the algorithms part way . in the ckkw l approach the subsequent steps are : + 4 ) evaluate sudakov factors for all the `` propagator '' lines in the shower history reconstructed in step 2 , i.e. for intermediate partons that split into further partons , and also for the evolution of the final partons down to the me cuts without any further emissions . this provides an acceptance weight @xmath186 where @xmath187 is the large scale where a parton is produced by a branching and @xmath188 either is the scale at which the parton branches or the me cuts , the case being . + 4a ) in the ckkw approach @xcite the sudakovs are evaluated by analytical formulae , which is fast . + 4b ) in the l approach @xcite trial showers are used to evaluate sudakovs , which is slower but allows a more precise modelling of kinematics and phase space than offered by the analytic expression . + 5 ) now the matrix - element configuration can be evolved further , to provide additional jets below the me cuts used . in order to avoid doublecounting of emissions , any branchings that might occur above the me cuts must be vetoed . the mlm approach @xcite is rather different . here the steps instead are : + 4 ) allow a complete parton shower to develop from the selected parton configuration . + 5 ) cluster these partons back into a set of jets , e.g. using a cone - jet algorithm , with the same jet - separation criteria as used when the original parton configuration was picked . + 6 ) try to match each jet to its nearest original parton . + 7 ) accept the event only if the number of clustered jets agrees with the number of original partons , and if each original parton is sensibly matched to its jet . this would not be the case e.g. if one parton gave rise to two jets , or two partons to one jet , or an original @xmath70 quark migrated outside of the clustered jet . + the point of the mlm approach is that the probability of _ not _ generating any additional fatal jet activity during the shower evolution is provided by the sudakovs used in the step 4. mc@nlo @xcite in some respects is the most ambitious approach : it aims to get not only real but also virtual contributions correctly included , so that cross sections are accurate to nlo , and that nlo results are obtained for all observables when formally expanded in powers of @xmath154 . thus hard emissions should again be generated according to me , while soft and collinear ones should fall within the ps regime . in simplified terms , the scheme works as follows : + 1 ) calculate the nlo me corrections to an @xmath49-body process , including @xmath189-body real corrections and @xmath49-body virtual ones . + 2 ) calculate analytically how a first branching in a shower starting from a @xmath49-body topology would populate @xmath189-body phase space , excluding the sudakov factor . + 3 ) subtract the shower expression from the @xmath189 me one to obtain the `` true '' @xmath189 events , and consider the rest as belonging to the @xmath49-body class . the ps and me expressions agree in the soft and collinear limits , so the singularities there cancel , leaving finite cross sections both for the @xmath49- and @xmath189-body event classes . + 4 ) now add showers to both kinds of events . ( 350,200)(-50,-50 ) ( 0,0)(180,0)(190,0)[]@xmath190 ( 0,0)(0,135)(0,145)[]@xmath191 ( 190,140)[l ] ( 70,98)(40,45 ) ( 60,110)[l]@xmath192 jet me ( 165,35)(90,10 ) ( 175,35)[l]generate as z + 1 jet + shower ( 165,110)(43,26 ) ( 175,110)[l]@xmath192 jet according to shower ( 175,95)[l](first emission , without sudakov ) ( 165,60)(35,10 ) ( 175,60)[l]generate as @xmath193 + shower ( 0,0)(0,70 ) ( -10,40)[r]lo real ( 0,0)(0,-50 ) ( -10,-30)[r]nlo virtual a toy example , for the case of @xmath8 production , is shown in fig . [ fig : mcnlo ] . several more complicated processes have been considered , such as @xmath194 , @xmath195 and @xmath196 production . a technical problem is that , although me and ps converge in the collinear region , it is not guaranteed that me is everywhere above ps . this is solved by having a small fraction of events with negative weights . in summary , mc@nlo is superiour in that it does provide the total cross section for a process to nlo accuracy , and so is essential for a set of precision tests . the real - emission @xmath189-body part is the same as used for merging , however , so for normalized event shapes the merging approach is as valid . ( any differences are of higher order . ) finally , if multijet topologies need to be studied , where several orders may contribute , vetoed showers are more appropriate . each tool to its task . the cross section for @xmath33 qcd parton processes is dominated by @xmath113-channel gluon exchange , as we already mentioned , and thus diverges like @xmath197 for @xmath20 . introduce a lower cut @xmath198 and integrate the interaction cross section above this , properly convoluted with parton densities . at lhc energies this @xmath199 reaches around 100 mb for @xmath200 gev , and 1000 mb at around 2 gev . since each interaction gives two jets to lowest order , the jet cross section is twice as big . this should be compared with an expected _ total _ cross section of the order of 100 mb . ( qcd is a confining theory and thus provides a finite total cross section , unlike qed , where infinitely small scattering angles are allowed at infinitely large distances . ) in addition , at least a third of the total cross section is related to elastic scattering @xmath201 and low - mass diffractive states @xmath202 that could not contain jets . so can it really make sense that @xmath203 ? yes , it can ! the point is that each incoming hadron is a bunch of partons . you can have several ( more or less ) independent parton parton interactions when these two bunches pass through each other . and the point is that an event with @xmath49 interactions above @xmath198 counts once for the total cross section but once _ for each interaction _ when the interaction rate is calculated . that is , @xmath204 where @xmath205 is the cross section for events with @xmath49 interactions . thus @xmath206 is equivalent to @xmath207 , that each event on the average contains more than one interaction . furthermore , if interactions really do occur independently when two hadron pass by each other , then one would expect a poissonian distribution , @xmath208 , so that several interactions could occur occasionally also when @xmath209 , e.g. for a larger @xmath198 cut . momentum conservation ensures that interactions never are truly independent , and also other effects enter ( see below ) , but the poissonian ansatz is still a useful starting point . multiple interactions ( mi ) can only be half the solution , however . the divergence for @xmath210 would seem to imply an infinite average number of interactions . but what one should realize is that , in order to calculate the @xmath211 matrix elements within standard perturbation theory , it has to be assumed that free quark and gluon states exist at negative and positive infinity . that is , the confinement of colour into hadrons of finite size has not been taken into account . so obviously perturbation theory has to have broken down by @xmath212 the nature of the breakdown is also easy to understand : a small-@xmath31 gluon , to be exchanged between the two incoming hadrons , has a large transverse wavelength and thus almost the same phase across the extent of each hadron . the contributions from all the colour charges in a hadron thus add coherently , and that means that they add to zero since the hadron is a colour singlet . what is then the typical scale of such colour screening effects , i.e. at what @xmath31 has the interaction rate dropped to @xmath213half of what it would have been if the quarks and gluons of a proton had all been free to interact fully independently ? that ought to be related to the typical separation distance between a given colour and its opposite anticolour . when a proton contains many partons this characteristic screening distance can well be much smaller than the proton radius . empirically we need to introduce a @xmath198 scale of the order of 2 gev to describe tevatron data , i.e. of the order of 0.1 fm separation . it is not meaningful to take this number too seriously without a detailed model of the space time structure of a hadron , however . the 2 gev number is very indirect and does not really tell exactly how the dampening occurs . one can use a simple recipe , with a step - function cut at this scale , or a physically more reasonable dampening by a factor @xmath214 , plus a corresponding shift of the @xmath154 argument , @xmath215 with @xmath216 a dampening scale that also lands at around 2 gev . this translates into a typical number of 23 interactions per event at the tevatron and 45 at lhc . for events with jets or other hard processes the average number is likely to be higher . the first studies of complete events based on perturbatively generated mi @xcite started out from a mimimally simple model : + 1 ) use a sharp @xmath198 cut as the key tunable parameter . + 2 ) only address inelastic nondiffractive events , i.e. with @xmath217 , so that the average number of interactions per such events is @xmath218 . + 3 ) to first approximation this gives a poissonian distribution in the number of interactions per event , with a fraction @xmath219 of purely low-@xmath31 interactions . + 4 ) the interactions are generated in an ordered sequence of decreasing @xmath31 values : @xmath220 . this is possible with the standard sudakov kind of trick : @xmath221 ~,\ ] ] with a starting @xmath222 . + 5 ) the ordering of emissions allows parton densities to be rescaled in @xmath141 after each interaction , so that energy momentum is not violated . thereby the actual distribution of the number of interactions becomes narrower than poissonian , since the rate of a further interaction is reduced if previous ones already took away energy . + 6 ) for technical reasons the model was simplified after the first interaction , so that there only @xmath98 or @xmath99 outgoing pairs were allowed , and no showers were added to these additional @xmath33 interactions . + already this simple pythia - based model is able to `` explain '' a large set of experimental data . some additional features were then included in a more sophisticated variant . + 1 ) use the smooth turnoff of eq . ( [ eq : smoothmi ] ) all the way down to @xmath223 . then an event has to contain at least one interaction to be an event at all , i.e. @xmath216 has to be selected sufficiently small that @xmath224 . + 2 ) hadrons are extended , and therefore partons are distributed in ( transverse ) coordinates . to allow a flexible parametrization and yet have an easy - to - work - with expression , a double gaussian @xmath225 is used , where @xmath226 and @xmath227 are tunable parameters . + 3 ) the matter overlap during a collision , calculated by @xmath228 directly determines the average activity in events at different impact parameter @xmath70 : @xmath229 . that is , central collisions tend to have more activity , peripheral less , but of course properly normalized so that the @xmath70-integrated interaction cross section agrees with standard perturbation theory ( modulo the already - discussed dampening at small @xmath31 ) . thereby the @xmath230 distribution becomes broader than a poissonian . + as before , several simplifications are necessary . + this is the scenario that has been used in many of the experimental studies over the years . more recently a number of improvements have been included @xcite . + 1 ) the introduction of junction fragmentation , wherein the confinement field between the three quarks in a baryon is described as a y - shaped topology , now allows the handling of topologies where several valence quarks are kicked out , thus allowing arbitrary flavours and showering in all interactions in an event . + 2 ) parton densities are not only rescaled for energy momentum conservation , but also to take into account the number of remaining valence quarks , or that sea quarks have to occur in @xmath99 pairs . + 3 ) the introduction of @xmath31-ordered showers allows the selection of new isr branchings and new interactions to be interleaved in one common sequence of falling @xmath31 values . thereby the competition between these two components , which both remove energy from the incoming beams , is modelled more realistically . fsr is not yet interleaved , but also does not compete for beam energy . + this scenario is not yet as well studied experimentally . the traditional herwig soft underlying event ( sue ) approach to this issue has its origin in the ua5 monte carlo . in it a number of clusters are distributed almost independently in rapidity and transverse momentum , but shifted so that energy momentum is conserved , and the clusters then decay isotropically . the multiplicity distribution of clusters and their @xmath231 and @xmath31 spectra are tuned to give the observed inclusive hadron spectra . no jets are produced in this approach . the jimmy @xcite program is an add - on to herwig . it replaces the sue model with a mi - based one more similar to the pythia ones above , e.g. with an impact - parameter - based picture for the multiple - interactions rate . technical differences exist , e.g. jimmy interactions are not picked to be @xmath31-ordered and thus energy momentum issues are handled differently . the dpmjet / dtujet / phojet family of programs @xcite come from the `` historical '' tradition of soft physics , wherein multiple @xmath232 `` pomeron '' exchanges fill a role somewhat similar to the hard mi above . jet physics was originally not included , but later both hard and soft interactions have been allowed . one strong point is that this framework also allows diffractive events to be included as part of the same basic machinery . how do we know that mi exist ? the key problem is that it is not possible to identify jets coming from @xmath233 gev partons . therefore we either have to use indirect signals for the presence of interactions at this scale or we have to content ourselves with studying the small fraction of events where two interactions occur at visibly large @xmath31 values . an example of the former is the total charged multiplicity distribution in high - energy @xmath2 collision . this distribution is very broad , and is even getting broader with increasing energy , meaured in terms of the width over the average , @xmath234 . by contrast , recall that for a poissonian this quantity scales like @xmath235 and thus is getting narrower . simple models , with at most one interaction and with a fragmentation framework in agreement with lep data , can not explain this : they are way to narrow , and have the wrong energy behaviour . if mi are included the additional variability in the number of interactions per event offers the missing piece @xcite . the variable - impact - parameter improves the description further . another related example is forward backward correlations . consider the charged multiplicity @xmath236 and @xmath237 in a forward and a backward rapidity bin , each of width one unit , separated by a central rapidity gap of size @xmath238 . it is not unnatural that @xmath236 and @xmath237 are somewhat correlated in two - jet events , and for small @xmath238 one may also be sensitive to the tails of jets . but the correlation coefficient , although falling with @xmath238 , still is appreciable even out to @xmath239 , and here again traditional one - interaction models come nowhere near . in a mi scenario each interaction provides additional particle production over a large rapidity range , and this additional number - of - mi variability leads to good agreement with data . direct evidence comes from the study of four - jet events . these can be caused by two separate interactions , but also by a single one where higher orders ( call it me or ps ) has allowed two additional branchings in a basic two - jet topology . fortunately the kinematics should be different . assume the four jets are ordered in @xmath31 , @xmath240 . if coming from two separate interactions the jets should pair up into two separately balancing sets , @xmath241 and @xmath242 . if an azimuthal angle @xmath243 is introduced between the two jet axes this also should be flat if the interactions are uncorrelated . by contast the higher - order graph offers no reason why the jets should occur in balanced pairs , and the @xmath243 distribution ought to be peaked at small values , corresponding to the familiar collinear singularity . the first to observe an mi signal this way was the afs collaboration @xcite at isr ( @xmath244 at 62 gev ) , but with large uncertainties . a more convincing study was made by cdf @xcite , who obtained a clear signal in a sample with three jets plus a photon . in fact the deduced rate was almost a factor of three higher than naive expectations , but quite in agreement with the impact - parameter - dependent picture , wherein correlations of this kind are enhanced . a topic that has quite extensively studied in cdf is that of the jet pedestal @xcite , i.e. the increased activity seen in events with a jet , even away from the jet itself , and away from the recoiling jet that should be there . some effects come from the showering activity , i.e. the presence of additional softer jets , but much of it rather finds its explanation in mi , as a kind of `` trigger bias '' effect , as follows . ( 1 ) central collisions tend to produce many interactions , peripheral ones few . ( 2 ) if an event has @xmath49 interactions there are @xmath49 chances that one of them is hard . combine the two and one concludes that events with hard jets are biased towards central collisions and many additional interactions . the rise of the pedestal with triggger - jet energy saturates once @xmath245 , however , because by then events are already maximally biased towards small impact parameter . and this is indeed what is observed in the data : a rapid rise of the pedestal up to @xmath246 gev , and then a slower increase that is mainly explained by showering contributions . in more detailed studies of this kind of pedestal effects there are also some indications of a jet substructure in the pedestal , i.e.that indeed the pedestal is associated with the production of additional ( soft ) jet pairs . in spite of many qualitative successes , and even some quantitative ones , one should not be lead to believe that all is understood . possibly the most troublesome issue is how colours are hooked up between all the outgoing partons that come from several different interactions . a first , already difficult , question is how colours are correlated between all the partons that are taken out from an incoming hadron . these colours are then mixed up by the respective scattering , in principle ( approximately ) calculable . but , finally , all the outgoing partons will radiate further and overlap with each other on the way out , and how much that may mess up colours is an open question . a sensitive quantity is @xmath247 , i.e. how the average transverse momentum of charged particles varies as a function of their multiplicity . if interactions are uncorrelated in colour this curve tends to be flat : each further interaction adds about as much @xmath31 as @xmath248 . if colours somehow would rearrange themselves , so that the confinement colour fields would not have to run criss - cross in the event , then the multiplicity would not rise as fast for each further interaction , and so a positive slope would result . the embarrassing part is that the cdf tunes tend to come up with values that are about 90% on the way to being maximally rearranged @xcite , which is way more than one would have guessed . obviously further modelling and tests are necessary here @xcite . another issue is whether the @xmath216 regularization scale should be energy - dependent . in olden days there was no need for this , but it became necessary when hera data showed that parton densities rise faster at small @xmath141 values than had commonly been assumed . this means that the partons become more close - packed and the colour screening increases faster with increasing collision energy . therefore an energy - dependent @xmath216 is not unreasonable , but also can not be predicted . currently the default pythia ansatz is @xmath249 , i.e a predicted @xmath250 gev at 14 tev . this gives a minimum - bias multiplicity of about 7 per unit of rapidity in the central region , and a pedestal under jet events of around 30 charged particles per unit @xcite . however , these numbers are model- and parameter - dependent . phojet predicts about half as big a pedestal , and typical jimmy tunes about 50% more , a priori leaving a big range of uncertainty to be resolved once lhc runs begin . the physics mechanisms discussed so far are mainly being played out on the partonic level , while experimentalists observe hadrons . in between exists the very important hadronization phase , where all the outgoing partons end up confined inside hadrons of a typical 1 gev mass scale . this phase can not ( so far ? ) be described from first principles , but has to involve some modelling . the main approaches in use today are string fragmentation and cluster fragmentation . these are described in the lectures of g. ingelman @xcite , so this section will be very brief , only with a few comments . hadronization models start from some ideologically motivated principles , but then have to add `` cookbook recipes '' with free parameters to arrive at a complete picture of all the nitty gritty details . this should come as no surprise , given that there are hundereds of known hadron species to take into account , each with its mass , width , wavefunction , couplings , decay patterns and other properties that could influence the structure of the observable hadronic state , and with many of those properties being poorly or not at all known , either from theory ( lattice qcd ) or from experiment . in that sense , it is sometimes more surprising that models can work as well as they do than that they fail to describe everything . the simpler initial state at an @xmath251 collider , such as lep , implies that this is the logical place to tune the hadronization framework to data @xcite , and thereafter those tunes can be applied to other studies . one such is the internal structure of jets in hadron collider , where the pattern in many respects is surprisingly well described . on the other hand , at the hera @xmath1 collider it has been observed that the relative amount of strange - particle production is only @xmath252 of that at lep , and of ( anti)baryons only @xmath253 . this has no simple explanation within the string fragmentation model , so it acts as a useful reminder that we still do not know as much as we should . also other examples could be provided in these lectures we have followed the flow of generators roughly `` inwards out '' , i.e. from short - distance processes to long - distance ones . at the core lies the hard process , described by matrix elements . it is surrounded by initial- and final - state showers , that should be properly matched to the hard process . multiple parton parton interactions can occur , and the colour flow is tied up with the structure of beam remnants . at longer timescales the partons turn into hadrons , many of which are unstable and decay further . this basic pattern is likely to remain in the future , but many aspects will change . one such aspect , that stands a bit apart , is that of languages . the traditional event generators , like pythia and herwig , have been developed in fortran up until the end of the lep era this was the main language in high - energy physics . but now the experimental community has largely switched to c++ and decisions have been taken e.g.at cern to discontinue fortran altogether . the older generators are still being used , hidden under c++ wrappers , but this can only be a temporary solution , for several reasons . one is that younger experimentalists often need to look into the code of generators and tailor some parts to specific needs of theirs , and if then the code is in an unknown language this will not work . another is that theory students who apply for non - academic positions are much better off if their resums say `` expert on object - oriented programming '' rather than `` fortran fan '' . a conversion program thus has begun on many fronts . sherpa , as the youngest of the general - purpose generators , was conceived from the onset as a c++ package and thus is some steps ahead of the other programs in this respect . @xcite is a complete reimplementation of the herwig , as is pythia 8 of the current pythia 6 . both conversions have taken longer than originally hoped , but progress is being made and first versions exist . thepeg @xcite is a generic toolkit for event generators , used by herwig++ and the upcoming new ariadne . * faster , better and more user - friendly general - purpose matrix - element generators with an improved sampling of phase space . * new ready - made libraries of physics processes , in particular with full nlo corrections included . * more precise parton showers . * better matching between matrix elements and parton showers . * improved models for minimum - bias physics and underlying events . * some upgrades of hadronization models and decay descriptions . in general one would say that generators are getting better all the time , but at the same time the experimental demands are also getting higher , so it is a tight race . however , given that typical hadronic final states at lhc will contain hundreds of particles and quite complex patterns buried in that , it is difficult to see that there are any alternatives . as the same time as you need to use generators , you should remain critical and be on the lookout for bugs and bad modelling . bjorken already many years ago worried about the passive attitude many experimentalists have towards the output of generators ; they `` carry the authority of data itself . they look like data and feel like data , and if one is not careful they are accepted as if they were data . '' do nt you fall into that trap ! s. mrenna , ` http://www.phys.psu.edu/`@xmath213`cteq/schools/summer04/mrenna/mrenna.pdf ` + p. richardson , ` http://www.ippp.dur.ac.uk/`@xmath213`richardn/talks/ ` + m. seymour , ` http://seymour.home.cern.ch/seymour/slides/cernlectures.html ` + t. sjstrand , ` http://www.thep.lu.se/`@xmath213`torbjorn/ ` ( click on `` talks '' ) i.g . knowles et al . , in ` physics at lep2 ' , eds . g. altarelli , t. sjstrand and f. zwirner , cern 9601 ( geneva , 1996 ) , vol . 2 , p. 103 ; + p. bambade et al . , in ` reports of the working groups on precision calculations for lep2 physics ' , eds . s. jadach , g. passarino and r. pittau , cern 2000 - 009 , p. 137 Abstract:
[ "the structure of events in high - energy collisions is complex and not predictable from first principles . event generators allow the problem to be subdivided into more manageable pieces , some of which can be described from first principles , while others need to be based on appropriate models with parameters tuned to data . in these lectures we provide an overview , discuss how matrix elements are used , introduce the machinery for initial- and final - state parton showers , explain how matrix elements and parton showers can be combined for optimal accuracy , introduce the concept of multiple parton parton interactions , comment briefly on the hadronization issue , and provide an outlook for the future . hep - ph/0611247 + cern - lcgapp-2006 - 06 + november 2006 +" ]
14,248
14,248
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the study of resonances in scattering systems with chaotic classical dynamics is an active field of research . it is at the same time driven by physicists being interested in the quantum properties of open chaotic systems as well as by mathematicians being interested in geometric analysis and partial differential equations ( pde ) on non - compact manifolds . while in scattering theory , resonances are poles of the scattering matrix and correspond to quasi - stationary quantum states with purely in- or outgoing boundary conditions , from the pde point of view resonances are often seen as the spectral invariants defined as the poles of a meromorphic continuation of the resolvent operator . aside from some very special exceptions ( e.g. the walsh quantized baker map @xcite ) the position of the resonances of such complex systems can not be determined exactly . it has , however , been a very successful approach to gain coarser information on general properties of the resonance distribution in terms of the underlying classical dynamics and geometry , respectively . for example results on spectral gaps @xcite predict resonance free regions and the fractal weyl law @xcite gives an upper bound on the growth of the number of the so - called `` long - living '' resonances in the high frequency limit . despite the large progress that has been made in obtaining rigorous results on the distribution of the resonances , there are still many open questions ( we refer to @xcite for an overview over recent results and open questions ) . for example the upper bound on the exponential growth of the resonance density which has been proven in the fractal weyl law @xcite is only conjectured to be sharp and there exists also a conjecture on the improvement of the spectral gap estimates @xcite . it has thus been a very important approach to study the resonance structure numerically and by physical experiments in order to test the present conjectures and to show that the results on resonance distributions can be observed in real physical systems . there have been established two paradigmatic scattering systems for these kind of tests : the @xmath0-disk systems and schottky surfaces . a @xmath0-disk system describes the scattering of one particle at @xmath0-circular obstacles in the euclidean plane ( see ) . it has been introduced by gaspard - rice @xcite and cvitanovi - eckhardt @xcite in physics and by ikawa @xcite in mathematics . in physics especially the completely symmetric 3-disk system , where 3 disks of the same size are arranged on a regular triangle , enjoys great popularity . it is already complex enough to have a classical dynamic with a non - trivial , fractal repeller and is still simple enough to be treated efficiently by numerics . there exist very efficient approaches to calculate the quantum resonances based on a direct scattering matrix ansatz @xcite as well as by a semiclassical approach using zeta functions @xcite . consequently it has been among the first systems to numerically observe the fractal weyl law @xcite . further importance arises from its experimental realizability @xcite and in recent microwave experiments the spectral gap @xcite and first hints of the fractal weyl law @xcite have been found . from a mathematical point of view the disadvantage of the @xmath0-disk system is that many of the numerical algorithms are not based on mathematical rigorous results . for example the conjecture that the zeros of the semiclassical zeta function are related to the quantum resonances , which has been thoroughly tested in physics @xcite , is mathematically open ( cf . * section 1.6 - 1.8 ) for recent results into this direction ) . this is the reason for the popularity of schottky surfaces as an explicit model system in mathematics . schottky surfaces are two - dimensional non - compact surfaces with constant negative curvature which are convex co - compact ( see for a sketch of a 3-funneled schottky surface ) . the constant negative curvature allows to prove that the zeros of the selberg zeta function are related to the resonances of the laplacian @xcite and not only approximately as conjectured for the 3-disk system in physics . furthermore jenkinson - pollicott @xcite derived , analogously to the cycle expansion of the 3-disk system , efficient formulas to numerically compute the zeros of the selberg zeta functions . the big drawback of these surfaces from the physical point of view is that there is no known experimental realization ( see @xcite for attempts to realize the wave equation on negatively curved surfaces with water waves ) . as the curvature of these surfaces is , however , strictly negative , the geodesic flow is hyperbolic and these surfaces are an interesting model for open chaotic systems . additionally the study of the resonances on constant negative curvature surfaces and the relation to their geometry is a mathematically interesting question itself ( see e.g. @xcite ) thus we will call these resonances _ geometric resonances_. the most simple example of schottky surfaces which already has a non - trivial fractal repeller are the 3-funneled surfaces as shown in the upper part of . for these surfaces borthwick recently presented a thorough numerical study of their resonances structure @xcite . one of the most surprising features of this resonance structure is an observation which has before already been made for the 3-disk system @xcite : even though the underlying classical dynamic is completely hyperbolic , i.e. strongly chaotic , the distribution of the resonances is highly ordered and the resonances form a striking chain structure in the complex plane ( see ) . the 3-disk system and the schottky surfaces are , however , not the only systems to embody these chain structures . very similar chains have for example also been observed in higher dimensional systems , as the 4-sphere billiard @xcite , and even in microdisk resonators which are important models for physical applications such as microdisk lasers @xcite . furthermore the phenomenon of resonance chains is not only restricted to resonances of the laplace operator and quantum resonances , respectively . also the spectrum of the classical ruelle resonances which describe the decay of correlations in classical dynamical systems has been reported to reveal these clear resonance chains @xcite . ( upper right ) and the quantum 3-disk system with @xmath1 ( lower ) . note : the resonances for the schottky surfaces are so dense that they appear as continuous lines in the plot above , however , they are discrete ( see ) . , scaledwidth=80.0% ] though these chains are eye - catching , little is known about these structures . for the completely symmetric 3-disk system and the completely symmetric 3-funneled schottky surface , the distance between the resonances on one chain has been observed to be related to the length of the shortest periodic orbit @xcite . additionally the oscillation length of the chains has been found to be related to the length difference between two fundamental periodic orbits . recently a numerical study of the 3-disk system @xcite showed that the resonance chains are not only a visual effect , but that the resonances on one chain share common physical properties . it was , however , shown that the resonance chains are not caused by scarring of the scattering states along individual classical orbits , but are related to the interatction of several classical orbits . two fundamental questions are , however , still open and will be addressed in this article . first of all the resonance chains , are a visual impression , i.e. our brain groups the resonances to different chains and we have the impression that they are strung along different continuous lines . in this article we will give a system intrinsic definition of these continuous lines . secondly , resonance chains have been observed in many , quite different systems . we will give a unifying condition on the classical length spectrum that is able to explain and predict the existence of resonance chains . the article is organized as follows : in section [ sec:3-disk ] we treat the resonance chains of the symmetric 3-disk system . after a general introduction of 3-disk systems ( section [ sec : intro_3-disk ] ) we will numerically illustrate that the resonance chains of the symmetric 3-disk system are created by fast rotating eigenvalues of a suitable transfer operator on the canonical poincar section . this idea applies for the semiclassical as well as for the classical resonances ( section [ sec : rot_res ] ) . then we give an introduction to schottky surfaces ( section [ sec : intro_schottky ] ) and show in section [ sec : gen_zeta ] that a straightforward application of this idea on the resonance spectrum of completely symmetric schottky surfaces fails to explain the resonance chains . however , the ideas can be abstracted . this leads us to the introduction of a generalized zeta function and the generalized spectrum which are shown to be the right objects to describe and understand the resonance chains . these objects immediately also allow to deal with non - symmetric schottky surfaces and 3-disk systems and also gives a condition for the existence of resonance chains ( section [ sec : existence_of_chains ] ) . in section [ sec : num_test ] we will finally test this condition in different cases and use its predictive power to identify systems incorporating different coexistent chain structures . as this article addresses a physical as well as a mathematical readership we decided to always state clearly which results and relations are known to be true by mathematically rigorous proofs and which results are achieved by physical arguments or experiments . this will help to keep an overview which parts of the argumentation are based on rigorous arguments and where further mathematical work remains to be done . this article itself does not claim to derive any rigorous statements either . instead our aim is to gain a universal understanding of the appearance of the resonance chains and to identify the mathematical quantities , which are crucial for their understanding , via numerical investigations . as the question , whether a chain structure is visible or not , is mathematically not well posed but depends on the observer of the resonance structure , our condition can not be a _ if and only if _ condition either . the condition established in section [ sec : gen_zeta ] is thus an approximate condition and our hypothesis is that the better this condition is fulfilled the clearer the chains will be visible . this hypothesis is tested and supported by various numerical results presented in section [ sec : num_test ] . a rigorouse proof of the existence of resonance will be given in @xcite , where the ideas and insights presented in this article are an essential ingredient . a 3-disk system describes one free particle in an euclidean 2-dimensional space that scatters at three non - overlapping hard disks @xmath2 and @xmath3 . for further use we will call the union of the disks by @xmath4 . classically its trajectories are given by straight lines and hard wall reflections at the disk boundaries @xmath5 ( see left panel of ) . its quantum dynamics is described by the laplacian @xmath6 with dirichlet boundary conditions at the disk boundaries and its quantum resonances can rigorously be defined as the poles of the resolvent @xmath7 this resolvent , as a map between compactly supported @xmath8 functions and locally @xmath8-integrable functions , is known to extend meromorphically to the @xmath9 where @xmath10 is any line connecting zero with infinity @xcite . these poles do indeed coincide with the physical scattering resonances i.e. if @xmath11 is a pole with multiplicity @xmath12 , then there exist @xmath12 solutions of @xmath13 with dirichlet and purely outgoing boundary conditions . the latter condition means that the solution @xmath14 in polar coordinates @xmath15 can be written asymptotically in the limit @xmath16 as @xcite @xmath17 contrary purely incoming boundary conditions would correspond to @xmath18 here @xmath19 are constant coefficients and for fixed @xmath10 the asymptotic @xmath20 dependence equals the asymptotic dependence of a free particle state with angular momentum @xmath10 . an important class of 3-disk systems are those which are completely symmetric . in those systems all three disks have the same size and the disks are arranged on an equilateral triangle ( see left part of ) . historically the side length of the triangle is denoted by @xmath21 and the disk radius by @xmath22 @xcite . these systems are then completely characterized , up to a scaling , by the ratio @xmath23 . as the system is highly symmetric and possesses the symmetry group @xmath3 of the equilateral triangle often the symmetry reduced system is studied in physics . this system consists of an open billiard representing the fundamental domain of the 3-disk system ( see light shaded region in the left part of ) . as already mentioned before the classical time evolution of a particle between two disk reflections is just a linear propagation interspersed with hard wall reflections . the trajectory of a particle therefore does not depend on the absolute value of its momentum and we can always scale it to @xmath24 . it is furthermore convenient to get rid of the parts of linear propagation where no complex dynamic takes place and consider only the poincar section of disk reflections . a particle at the boundary of a disk @xmath25 of radius @xmath26 whose momentum is scaled to one , is completely described by its birkhoff coordinates @xmath27 . they are defined as the arc length @xmath28 $ ] on the disk boundary as well as the projection of the normalized incoming momentum to the unit tangent vector at the disk boundary @xmath29 $ ] ( see ) . the complete space @xmath30 of the poincar section consists of three copies of @xmath31\times[-1,1]$ ] . as the system is open the dynamics are not defined on all @xmath30 , because in many cases a particle with birkhoff coordinates @xmath27 will just escape to infinity after the reflection and will not hit any of the other disks in the future . we therefore introduce the forward trapped set @xmath32 of order @xmath0 as the set of all points in @xmath30 which will hit at least @xmath0 disks on their future trajectories . analogously we define the backward trapped set @xmath33 for the time inverted dynamics . the discrete time dynamics on the poincar section is then a diffeomorphism in the figure ) and by the projection of the unit momentum vector on the unit tangent vector . , scaledwidth=70.0% ] @xmath34 note that this diffeomorphism only leaves invariant the trapped set @xmath35 which is known to be a fractal subset of @xmath30 if the 3 disks are sufficiently far away from each other @xcite . using this discrete time dynamics we can define for any smooth function @xmath36 the transfer operator @xmath37 by setting @xmath38 which is an operator with integration kernel @xmath39 in the theory of dynamical systems this function @xmath40 is commonly called the _ potential function _ even if @xmath40 does not at all play the role of a potential in the sense of classical mechanics . with this transfer operator we can now introduce the zeta function . if we suppose that @xmath41 can be extended to a banach space @xmath42 such that @xmath41 is trace class then we can study the dynamical zeta function associated to the potential @xmath40 which is defined by the fredholm determinant @xmath43 this function is then known to be analytic in @xmath44 and the discrete spectrum @xmath45 of the transfer operator is related to the zeros of the dynamical zeta function by @xmath46 by the explicit form ( [ eq : kernel_transfer_op ] ) of the kernel @xmath47 we can on the other hand formally define the so - called flat trace @xmath48 where @xmath49 is the jacobian of @xmath50 , @xmath51 the iterated product and @xmath52 the set of all fixed points of @xmath50 . by the flat trace we can define in complete analogy to ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_fredholm ] ) another zeta function by @xmath53 by a standard calculation for zeta functions ( see [ app : product_form ] ) this expression can be brought to the form @xmath54 here @xmath55 is the set of all _ primitive periodic orbits _ of the map @xmath56 , i.e. the set of all periodic orbits @xmath57 for which there is no @xmath58 which also fulfills @xmath59 . furthermore @xmath60 is the discrete time length of this orbit , @xmath61 is the iterated product of the potential @xmath40 along the primitive orbit @xmath62 and @xmath63 is the eigenvalue of @xmath64 whose absolute value is larger than one . it is important to note that the expressions ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_flat ] ) and ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_product_form ] ) only converge absolutely for @xmath65 sufficiently small . furthermore ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_flat ] ) directly implies that the zeta function has no zeros in the region of absolute convergence . equations ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_flat ] ) and ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_product_form ] ) are thus of no direct use for a calculation of the zeros of the dynamical zeta function . if one knows , however , that @xmath66 can be extended analytically beyond the region of absolute convergence , its taylor expansion in @xmath44 around zero @xmath67 will automatically converge absolutely on any disk contained in the region of analytic continuation . this trick has been introduced in physics by cvitanovi and eckhardt @xcite under the name cycle expansion . from a mathematical point of view , the biggest challenge is to prove the analytic continuation of the zeta function defined by ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_flat ] ) and to show that its zeros correspond to the spectrum of @xmath41 . this is for example possible if one finds function spaces such that @xmath41 is trace class and that its trace in this space equals the flat trace . then one obtains by the analyticity of the fredholm determinant automatically an analytic continuation of the zeta function . such results are known for several classes of systems ( for example for real analytic expanding or hyperbolic maps @xcite ) but to our knowledge not in any setting in which the 3-disk system fits . physicists usually skip this difficulty and test for concrete examples in which regions the cycle expansion numerically converges . it is then assumed that this region coincides with the region of analytic continuation . furthermore it is usually assumed that the zeros of the zeta function defined by the flat trace ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_flat ] ) are eigenvalues of the transfer operator . as there is not yet a satisfying mathematical theory in the case of the 3-disk system we will also make these assumptions from now on . for the 3-disk system two particular choices for the potential are of special interest as they lead to the classical zeta function and to the semiclassical or gutzwiller - voros zeta function , respectively . the return time or return length of a particle at the disk boundary with birkhoff coordinates @xmath68 is defined as the length of the trajectory until the next disk reflection . this defines a smooth bounded function @xmath69 and we first can consider for @xmath70 the analytic family of potentials @xmath71 plugging this potential into ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_product_form ] ) we obtain a dynamical zeta function depending on two variables @xmath72 @xmath73 where @xmath74 is the birkhoff sum along this orbit defined by @xmath75 for @xmath76 being an arbitrary point on the orbit @xmath62 . it is related to the selberg - smale zeta function by @xcite @xmath77 this zeta function is of special interest because its zeros , the so - called ruelle resonances , determine the decay of correlations of the classical dynamical system ( at least for systems where the theory of ruelle resonances is established , for the 3-disk system this is again conjectured to be true , c.f . this is why these zeta functions have been studied numerically by gaspard and ramirez @xcite for the symmetric 3-disk system where they observed the resonance chains presented in . using the ideas of @xcite we can also express the gutzwiller - voros zeta function by transfer operators . we therefore define the function @xmath78 on @xmath79 to be the restriction of the jacobian @xmath80 to the unstable direction which is simply given by the multiplication with a nonzero number . if @xmath76 is a fixed point of an iteration of the poincar map @xmath81 , then the iterated product of @xmath78 will be exactly the unstable eigenvalue @xmath82 of @xmath83 . with this function we define @xmath84 as well as the corresponding fredholm determinants @xmath85 we can then study the quotient @xmath86 for the last equality we used that the poincar map is orientation inverting and consequently @xmath87 which implies that @xmath88 the final expression is related to the so - called gutzwiller - voros zeta function @xcite by @xmath89 it has been numerically thoroughly checked @xcite that the zeros of @xmath90 coincide to a high precision to the quantum resonance which have numerically been obtained by a quantum scattering approach . it is conjectured that the zeros of the gutzwiller - voros zeta function converge towards the quantum resonances in the semiclassical limit . this relation @xcite is , however , based on the gutzwiller - trace formula for the quantum propagator beyond the ehrenfest time , and from the mathematical point of view the relation to the quantum spectrum is completely open . for practical purpose this relation between the zeros of the zeta function and the quantum resonances has , however , a huge advantage because especially in the regime of high energies the calculations of the zeros of @xmath90 via the cycle expansion is much faster than the calculation based on the quantum scattering matrix and it has been exploited in many numerical works on the quantum spectrum @xcite . we now want to understand the resonance chains for the symmetric 3-disk system via the zeta functions introduced above . the zeta functions allow to handle the resonance chains for classical ruelle resonances and quantum resonances by the same approach , even though the physical nature of these resonances is completely different . in both cases one has a zeta function @xmath91 which depends on two complex variables and the resonances are defined by ( see ( [ eq : gv_transfer_equivalence ] ) ) . in order to emphasize the uniform approach to quantum and classical resonances as well as the geometric resonances on schottky surfaces , we will , however , from now on consider the quantum resonances to be parametrized by @xmath92 which simply leads to a clockwise rotation by @xmath93 of the quantum resonances in the plots . ] @xmath94 note that for the quantum case we use the hypothesis that the semiclassical and quantum resonances coincide . we will , however , only use this correspondence for the symmetric 3-disk system in an energy regime , where this correspondence is known to hold with a very high precision @xcite . beside the set of resonances which we have defined to be the zeros in @xmath95 of @xmath91 for fixed @xmath96 it seems also natural to consider for a fixed @xmath97 the zero set in @xmath44 . in order to have a direct physical interpretation of this set we consider the inverses of these zeros and define for a fixed @xmath97 @xmath98 using the fredholm determinant representation of the classical zeta function @xmath99 one directly identifies @xmath100 which is the spectrum of @xmath101 . for the semiclassical resonances this identification is slightly more subtle as @xmath102 has been defined as the quotient of two zeta functions . if we assume , however , that @xmath103 is analytic in a neighborhood of @xmath104 , then the gutzwiller - voros zeta function can only vanish if the nominator of the quotient vanishes , i.e. if @xmath105 and @xmath106 . note that the analyticity assumption of @xmath103 is not very strong and in the @xmath95-range which we will consider in the sequel it is always fulfilled ( see [ app : top_pres ] ) summarizing , we have the following two objects in the classical as well as in the semiclassical or quantum case : on the one hand we have the resonance spectrum which equals the zeros of the zeta function in @xmath95 for @xmath96 and on the other hand we have for any @xmath97 the discrete set @xmath107 which can be interpreted as the eigenvalues of a transfer operator @xmath108 which is parametrized by a complex number @xmath95 . obviously @xmath95 is a resonance if and only if the operator @xmath109 has @xmath24 as an eigenvalue i.e. @xmath110 the simple but important observation is now the following : if we start with a resonance @xmath111 of multiplicity one and continuously vary the parameter @xmath95 then we will be able to trace the eigenvalue which was equal to @xmath24 for @xmath112 and which continuously depends on @xmath95 . we will call this eigenvalue @xmath113 . a closer look in the concrete form of our transfer operators @xmath108 allows us to predict how the eigenvalues will approximately depend on @xmath95 . in the quantum case for @xmath114 as well as in the classical case with @xmath115 we have @xmath116 where @xmath117 is simply the multiplication operator . in the case of the symmetric 3-disk system the return time is a smooth function which becomes more and more homogeneous the bigger @xmath23 becomes . assuming as a first order approximation that @xmath118 then @xmath119 if this approximation was exactly true and if we moved with @xmath95 parallel to the imaginary axis , then the eigenvalue @xmath113 would simply rotate around zero on the unit circle . note that by the definition of the resonance set , every @xmath95 value for which @xmath113 crosses the value point 1 on the unit circle is itself a resonance . by this argument a single eigenvalue of @xmath120 would create a whole chain of resonances , parallel to the imaginary axis.the resonances would be equally distributed along this chain with a distance of @xmath121 . as the return time is in reality not exactly constant one would expect that slight variations deform the chains and also lead to a distance variation between the extremal values of the return time . it can be checked numerically that it is exactly this mechanism of a rotating eigenvalue of the operator @xmath108 which creates the resonance chains . in this is visualized for the quantum resonances of the symmetric 3-disk system with @xmath1 . on the left we can see a plot of the quantum resonances @xmath122 in the complex plane . ] . on the right the spectrum of the transfer operator @xmath123 is presented . the blue crosses indicate the eigenvalues with @xmath124 for an @xmath95-value which equals the resonance @xmath125 . as expected we find an eigenvalue which is equal to @xmath24 . there is also another eigenvalue plotted which corresponds to the second chain which is nearby the chain to which @xmath126 belongs . there are further eigenvalues of the transfer operator near zero which we did not plot as the convergence of the zeta function becomes more and more complicated the smaller the absolute values of @xmath44 . the colored points show how the eigenvalue at @xmath24 moves , if the @xmath95 values varies between two resonances @xmath126 and @xmath127 . as suggested by the heuristic arguments above the eigenvalue moves along the unit circle in a clockwise orientation and creates the next resonances on the chain . exactly the same can be observed for the classical ruelle resonances of the 3-disk system with @xmath1 ( see ) . . the inset shows the chain structure of the resonances on a large domain in the complex plane . the main plot shows a strong zoom into one chain , such that only few individual resonances are in the plot region ( blue crosses ) . the region of the zoom is indicated in the inset by a red rectangle . the colored dots between the two resonances @xmath125 and @xmath127 represent a discrete interpolation between the two resonances . the interpolation follows the line suggested by the resonance chains . right : spectrum of the transfer operator on the poincar section . the blue crosses represent the spectrum of @xmath128 with @xmath124 . by the colored dots we follow the evolution of the eigenvalue starting at 1 for @xmath126 while @xmath95 varies as indicated by the colored points in the left panel . the evolution of the second eigenvalue is not plotted for more clarity . ] . the inset shows the chain structure of the resonances on a large domain in the complex plane . the main plot shows a strong zoom into one chain , such that only few individual resonances are in the plot region ( blue crosses ) . the region of the zoom is indicated in the inset by a red rectangle . the colored dots between the two resonances @xmath129 and @xmath130 represent a discrete interpolation between the two resonances following the line suggested by the resonance chains . right : spectrum of the transfer operator on the poincar section . the blue crosses represent the spectrum of @xmath128 with @xmath124 . by the colored dots we follow the evolution of the eigenvalue starting at 1 for @xmath126 . ] and @xmath127 now do not follow the line which is suggested by the resonance chains but a deformed path . as a consequence the eigenvalue of @xmath128 starting at 1 for @xmath126 now turns one time around zero on a path which is not on the unit circle ( black , dotted ) . ] these numerical results do , however , not only confirm that the hypothesis that each resonance chain is created by a rotating @xmath108-eigenvalue is true . they also indicate what the continuous mathematical object is that the resonances are distributed on . note that taking two neighboring resonances of one chain there are multiple paths to connect these two resonances . while each path will effectively lead to one rotation of @xmath113 around zero , there is only one such path , for which @xmath113 stays on the unit circle . as it can be seen in such a rotation on the unit circle is obtained if the two resonances are connected along the path which is suggested by the structure of the resonance chains . if one , however , takes a different path between the two resonances , then the corresponding eigenvalue of @xmath108 will turn on a deformed circle around zero ( see for an arbitrary path between the two resonances ) . we can thus define @xmath131 and from the numerics above we conclude that the continuous object on which the resonances are distributed is given by @xmath132 where @xmath133 is the projection on the @xmath95-component . we have thus seen in this section that the resonance chains of the classical and the quantum resonances are generated by the same mechanism . as in both cases the resonances can be seen as the zero set in @xmath95 of a zeta function , which can be represented as a fredholm determinant of a @xmath95-dependent family of operators . the resonance chains are generated by single eigenvalues of @xmath108 which circle around zero while @xmath95 moves along the chain . furthermore this approach allows a system - intrinsic definition of a continuous object that coincides with the visually suggested curves on which the resonances are strung together . in the next section we will see how this idea can be extended to the resonance chains on schottky surfaces and examine in detail the question in which systems resonance chains will occur and in which not . schottky surfaces are a special class of infinite volume riemann surfaces . in this section we will give a brief introduction to its most important properties . for a detailed introduction we refer to @xcite . the easiest way to define schottky surfaces is as a quotient of the upper half plane by a so - called schottky group . the upper half plane @xmath134 together with the riemannian metric @xmath135 has a constant negative gauss curvature @xmath136 and is a standard model of hyperbolic geometry . the group @xmath137 of real invertible matrices with determinant one acts on @xmath138 via moebius transformations @xmath139 in fact for every @xmath140 the moebius transformation is an orientation preserving isometry and all orientation preserving isometries of the upper half - plane can be expressed as an @xmath137-action . a schottky group is then a discrete subgroup @xmath141 which is constructed in the following way : let @xmath142 be disks with centers on the real line and mutually disjoint closure . then for every @xmath143 there exists an element @xmath144 that maps the boundary @xmath145 to the boundary of @xmath146 and the interior of @xmath25 to the exterior of @xmath147 . from the disjointness of the disks follows that the elements @xmath148 are the generators of a free discrete subgroup @xmath149 and such groups are called _ schottky groups_. the quotient @xmath150 is then again a surface with constant negative curvature and is called _ schottky surface_. the 3-funneled surfaces , which we are interested in , are from the dynamical point of view the simplest nontrivial example and they are constructed from four disks arranged as in . the surface can be thought as the set @xmath151 glued together along the two dotted blue half circles as well as along the two dashed red half circles ( see ) . it is known that such 3-funneled schottky surfaces are uniquely determined by the three lengths @xmath152 of the geodesics @xmath153 that wind once around one of the 3-funnels ( see upper part of ) . furthermore for any triple of positive numbers @xmath152 there exists a 3-funneled schottky surface which has fundamental geodesics of this length and we will call this surface @xmath154 . . the dotted blue and dashed red lines indicate the lines along which the fundamental domain is glued together in order to obtain the surfaces . lower part : configuration of 4 disks that give rise to the construction of the schottky group for a 3-funneled surface . the upper half plane without the disks represents a fundamental domain and the surface can be obtained by gluing together the red dashed lines with the blue dotted lines . in black the three fundamental closed geodesics @xmath155 from the upper part of the figure are shown . while @xmath156 and @xmath157 are only represented by one arc each , the geodesic @xmath158 appears as two arcs in the fundamental domain.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=70.0% ] . the dotted blue and dashed red lines indicate the lines along which the fundamental domain is glued together in order to obtain the surfaces . lower part : configuration of 4 disks that give rise to the construction of the schottky group for a 3-funneled surface . the upper half plane without the disks represents a fundamental domain and the surface can be obtained by gluing together the red dashed lines with the blue dotted lines . in black the three fundamental closed geodesics @xmath155 from the upper part of the figure are shown . while @xmath156 and @xmath157 are only represented by one arc each , the geodesic @xmath158 appears as two arcs in the fundamental domain.,title="fig : " ] in order to define the geometric resonances on a schottky surface @xmath159 we consider the positive laplacian which is defined by the metric and which we call @xmath160 and we define the resolvent @xmath161 by mazzeo - melrose @xcite and guillope - zworski @xcite we know that the resolvent admits a meromorphic continuation and we define the resonance set @xmath162 again as the set of its poles . note that the resolvent s parametrization is different from the parametrization via @xmath163 in the 3-disk case , which leads to the fact that the resonance chains do not oscillate along the real axis but along the imaginary axis . this parametrization is , however , very useful as it admits the following exact relation between the resonances of the laplacian and a zeta function : let @xmath164 be the set of all primitive closed geodesics on @xmath159 , i.e. those closed geodesics that can not be obtained by repeting a shorter closed geodesic . if for @xmath165 , @xmath166 denotes the length of the periodic geodesic , then the selberg zeta function is defined as @xmath167 this product is known to converge uniformly on any compact set with @xmath168 and for @xmath159 being a schottky surface the selberg zeta function is known to extend analytically to the whole complex plane @xmath169 and there is the following relation between its zeros and the resonances of @xmath160 : if @xmath170 then @xmath95 is either a topological zero with @xmath171 or a resonance i.e. @xmath172 @xcite . for schottky surfaces we can express the selberg zeta function as a fredholm determinant of a transfer operator . we therefore define the _ bowen - series map _ of a schottky group @xmath173 by @xmath174 here we used the convention that for @xmath175 , @xmath176 . we can then define a family of transfer operators parametrized by @xmath97 via its action @xmath177 where @xmath178 is the complex derivative of the bowen - series map and @xmath179 . these transfer operators are known to be trace class on the space of holomorphic @xmath8-functions on @xmath180 ( see @xcite for the original proof in slightly different functions spaces or ( * ? ? ? * lemma 15.6 ) ) and one therefore knows that its dynamical zeta function @xmath181 is analytic . we will give a short sketch of the idea how to relate the dynamical zeta function to the selberg zeta function . for more details we refer to ( * ? ? ? * section 15.3 ) . one first can proof that the trace of @xmath108 equals its flat trace and obtains @xmath182 as in the case of the 3-disk system ( cf . equation ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_product_form ] ) and [ app : product_form ] ) one can transform the dynamical zeta function into a product over prime orbits of the bowen - series map @xmath183 . in a second step one can prove that the set of primitive periodic geodesics is in one - to - one correspondence to the primitive periodic orbits of the bowen - series maps , i.e. for each @xmath165 there exists a unique @xmath184 and a periodic orbit @xmath185 and the length of the geodesic is related to the stability of the fixed point by @xmath186 if we denote this @xmath0 as the _ bowen - series order _ @xmath187 of the geodesic @xmath188 , then we obtain , combining all arguments @xmath189 in particular this yields @xmath190 and we deduce that @xmath191 implies that @xmath108 has an eigenvalue equal to 1 . the previous discussion on the relation between the spectrum of @xmath108 and the resonances of the laplacian , together with the observations from section [ sec : rot_res ] that for 3-disk systems rotating eigenvalues of a transfer operator create the resonance chains would suggest that the resonance chains for the 3-funneled schottky surfaces are generated by rotating eigenvalues of the bowen - series transfer operator @xmath108 . however , this idea fails completely to explain the resonance chains for the 3-funneled symmetric surfaces : in we have plotted for @xmath192 the spectrum of @xmath108 for different @xmath95-values interpolating between two resonances @xmath126 and @xmath193 . . the inset shows the chain structure of the resonances on a large domain in the complex plane . the main plot shows a strong zoom into one chain , such that the individual resonances become visible ( blue crosses ) . the region of the zoom is indicated in the inset by a red rectangle . the colored dots between the two resonances @xmath194 and @xmath195 represent a discrete interpolation between the two resonances , following the line suggested by the resonance chains . right : spectrum of the bowen - series transfer operator with @xmath196 . the blue crosses represent the spectrum of @xmath128 . by the colored dots we follow the evolution of two particular eigenvalues , as the @xmath95-values evolve as indicated by the colored points in the left panel . we only follow the evolution of the eigenvalue starting at 1 for @xmath126 and the one ending at 1 for @xmath193 . the evolution of the other eigenvalues is not shown for more clarity . ] we observe that the eigenvalues start to turn while we move along the chain . however , the eigenvalue which was equal to @xmath24 for @xmath197 is drawn towards zero and when we approach @xmath198 it is another eigenvalue of @xmath108 which has been coming out from the interior , that creates the next resonance . in order to understand why a direct application of the idea of rotating eigenvalues to the spectrum of the bowen - series transfer operator @xmath108 fails , we recall that for the 3-disk system it has been an important argument that the return time of the poincar section is very homogeneous . this assumption is , however , not at all fulfilled for the standard bowen - series map , which corresponds morally to a poincar section indicated by the blue and red lines in . the return time or return length respectively is thus very inhomogeneous : while on @xmath192 for the closed geodesics @xmath156 and @xmath157 the return length is equal to @xmath199 , it equals only @xmath200 for the geodesic @xmath158 as this geodesic crosses the poincar section twice . in order to fix this issue we could try to construct another transfer operator which still has the property that its dynamical zeta function is related to the selberg zeta function but which has a homogeneous return time for the completely symmetric 3-funneled schottky surface . such a construction is in principle possible ( see @xcite ) , this solution would then , however , be restricted to completely symmetric schottky surfaces . non - symmetric surfaces , for which resonance chains have also been observed , would then need a construction of more and more complicated transfer operators . we will thus choose a different approach and work directly with the zeta functions which turns out to be much more flexible . looking at equation ( [ eq : dyn_zeta_bs ] ) the choice of the poincar section appears only in the order function @xmath201 . this order function has been defined as the length of the prime @xmath183-orbit which is associated to the primitive geodesic @xmath188 and it is exactly given by the number of times the geodesic passes one of the cut lines in . instead of constructing another poincar section we can also directly modify the zeta function and we can introduce for each map @xmath202 the _ generalized zeta function _ @xmath203 of course for a general order function @xmath204 it is not directly clear where this product converges and whether it has an analytic extension . for all order functions that will appear in the sequel , one can , however , show , that such an analytic extension exists and we refer to @xcite for a rigorous proof . the important observation is now that changing the order function only changes the values of the dynamical zeta functions for @xmath205 and the important relation @xmath206 is still true . we can therefore define in analogy to the spectrum of the transfer operator ( [ eq : sigma_s_3-disk ] ) , the _ generalized spectrum _ @xmath207 from ( [ eq : gen_zeta - selberg_zeta ] ) we conclude that also for this generalized spectrum we have the important relation @xmath208 thus instead of tracing the eigenvalues of a transfer operator we can follow the generalized spectral values while interpolating between different resonances on one chain . the order function which would correspond to a poincar section of the symmetric surface @xmath192 with a homogeneous return time counts for each closed geodesic how often it winds around one of the funnels . in we traced the generalized spectrum while we interpolate between the same two resonances as in and indeed we observe that the generalized spectral value which equals @xmath24 for @xmath197 starts to turn around zero and creates all the other resonances on this chains by passing through @xmath96 . additionally we see in that if the @xmath95-values follow the path which is suggested by the resonance chains , then the generalized spectral value stays on the unit circle . the continuous lines on which the resonances lie can thus be understood by the real analytic variety @xmath209 precisely they are again given by @xmath210 , the projection of this variety on the @xmath95-component . with @xmath196 for an order function that counts the number of windings around the funnels . the blue crosses represent the spectrum @xmath211 . by the colored dots we follow the evolution of the spectral value which equals 1 for @xmath197 . the evolution of the other spectral values is again not plotted . ] this approach of working with a generalized zeta function immediately allows us to understand resonance chains for non - symmetric surfaces , as well . these chains have first been observed by borthwick , for example for the surface @xmath212 ( cf . * figure 7 ) ) . a homogeneous return time would here require to cut one turn around the first funnel into 12 pieces , one turn around the second funnel into 13 and a turn around the third funnel into 14 pieces . we therefore define for @xmath213 the order function @xmath214 where @xmath215 counts the windings of the geodesic around the @xmath216-th funnel . figure [ fig : rot_res_12_13_14 ] shows the generalized spectrum for this order function and it perfectly explains the resonance chains . again the spectral value turns once around the unit circle and creates the next resonance on the chains when the @xmath95 value moves along the chains . note that the two other spectral values in @xmath211 ( blue crosses in the left part of ) seem also to lie on the unit circle , which is not the case . their absolute values are @xmath217 and @xmath218 and they belong to nearby chains , which are visible in the left part of . there are also further spectral values with absolute value slightly smaller then one . we however decided to not plot them in for more clarity and as a reliable calculation of the generalized spectrum becomes more and more complicated for small absolute values of @xmath44 as the order function @xmath204 appears with high exponents ( cf . [ app : numeric ] ) . . the inset shows the chain structure of the resonances on a large domain in the complex plane . the main plot shows a zoom into one chain , such that the individual resonances become better distinguishable ( blue crosses ) . for orientation the region of the zoom is indicated in the inset by a red rectangle . the colored dots between the two resonances @xmath219 and @xmath220 represent a discrete interpolation between the two resonances following the line suggested by the resonance chains . right : generalized spectrum for the order function as defined in ( [ eq : funnel_order_func ] ) with @xmath221 for spectral values with @xmath222 . the blue crosses represent the spectrum @xmath223 . by the colored dots we follow the evolution of one spectral value as the @xmath95-values evolve as indicated by the colored points in the right panel . we only follow the evolution of the spectral value starting at 1 for @xmath197 for more clarity . ] from the examples in the previous section we have learned that the resonance chains for symmetric as well as for asymmetric schottky surfaces are best understood in terms of the generalized zeta function for a suitable choice of an order function . up to now we have only presented two examples in ( and ) together with a good choice of an order function but we have not yet clearly worked out under which circumstances it is possible to construct a `` good '' order function . we will see that this question automatically leads us to a condition on the observability of resonance chains . the primitive length spectrum , which contains the lengths of all primitive closed geodesics , repeated by multiplicity , can be seen for @xmath192 in and for @xmath212 in . we see that the length spectra of both surfaces form a clear clustering on multiples of a base length @xmath224 . . the thin light lines indicate the integer multiples of the base length @xmath199 and one observes that the lengths form clear clusters around these values . this clustering is however not perfect as can be seen in the inset where a histogram with a much smaller binsize resolves the peak at a length around 60 . ] . the thin light lines indicate the integer multiples of the base length @xmath24 and one observes that the lengths form clear clusters around these values . again this clustering is not perfect as can be seen in the inset where a histogram with a much smaller binsize resolves the peak at a length around 51 . ] the big difference between these two cases is that the common base length to all clusters is @xmath225 for @xmath192 and @xmath226 for @xmath212 . analyzing the two order functions which we have used in these examples , we observe that they exactly respect this clustering : all geodesics of one cluster are mapped to the same integer which is given by the multiple of the base length @xmath224 on which the cluster is located . all geodesics that are necessary to be taken into account for the calculation of the resonances fulfill very well the approximation @xmath227 if this condition is exactly fulfilled , then this will lead , similar to the case of a constant return time in section [ sec : rot_res ] , to the existence of straight resonance chains . in fact under this assumption the generalized zeta function could be written as @xmath228 and if @xmath229 , i.e. @xmath230 then for all @xmath231 also @xmath232 . this condition , however , directly implies that @xmath233 for each @xmath234 , so all resonances would equidistribute on straight lines with a distance of @xmath235 . note that for the hyperbolic cylinder ( [ eq : order_func_condition ] ) is exactly fulfilled and the resonance spectrum is known to be ordered along straight lines ( * ? ? ? * section 5.1 ) . for non - elementary surfaces ( [ eq : order_func_condition ] ) can , however , only hold approximately , and one thus expects that these straight chains start to bend and that the spacing of the resonances along the chains becomes more irregular . we therefore can formulate the following hypothesis : _ if the primitive length spectrum of an infinite volume riemannian surface ( or an open euclidean billiard ) forms clusters at integer multiples of a base length , i.e. if there is a length @xmath224 and an order function @xmath236 such that ( [ eq : order_func_condition ] ) holds , then one will observe resonance chains . these chains will be described by the projection @xmath237 of the analytic variety @xmath238 to the @xmath95-component and the resonances will be approximately spaced by a distance of @xmath235 on these lines . the worse the approximation ( [ eq : order_func_condition ] ) is fulfilled , the stronger the chains will bend and the more irregular the resonance distribution on the chains will become . _ of course ( [ eq : order_func_condition ] ) can not hold on the whole length spectrum , but recall that for the calculation of the resonances in a bounded subset of a complex plane , one only needs finitely many geodesics . we thus suppose that the chains will be observable in this bounded domain , if ( [ eq : order_func_condition ] ) is fulfilled on the geodesics which are necessary for their calculation . we already saw several examples in section [ sec : rot_res ] and [ sec : gen_zeta ] which support our hypothesis on the existence of resonance chains . we will now test its validity against some more examples . first of all our condition should be able to explain the non - observability of resonance chains in some systems which are structurally similar to systems which show resonance chains . for example one observes that symmetric 3-disk billiards only show resonance chains if the disks are sufficiently far away from each other . the resonance spectrum of the symmetric 3-disk billiard with @xmath239 shows no chain structure contrary to the more open case with @xmath1 ( see ) . this is easily understood by looking at the primitive length spectrum . while for @xmath1 one sees a clear clustering of the lengths , the length spectrum for @xmath239 equidistributes very quickly and it is impossible to choose an order function which fulfills ( [ eq : order_func_condition ] ) . ( upper plot ) and @xmath1 ( lower plot ) . while for @xmath1 one observes a clear clustering of the lengths and an obvious chain structure in the resonances , the lengths equidistribute very quickly and their are no visible chains in the resonance spectrum.,title="fig : " ] ( upper plot ) and @xmath1 ( lower plot ) . while for @xmath1 one observes a clear clustering of the lengths and an obvious chain structure in the resonances , the lengths equidistribute very quickly and their are no visible chains in the resonance spectrum.,title="fig : " ] our hypothesis also explains why symmetric 4-disk systems show in general no chain structure ( see e.g. fig . 13 in @xcite for the ruelle resonances of a 4-disk system ) whereas the 3-dimensional 4-sphere billiard shows them : if 4 disks are distributed on a square , the lengths between two neighboring disks and the length between diagonal disks are in general not multiples of each others but form two incommensurable base lengths , so it will not be possible to construct a good order function . for the 4-sphere billiard where the spheres are placed on a regular tetrahedron , the distance between an arbitrary pair of spheres is equal and , if the spheres are sufficiently far away from each other , one expects a clustering of the length spectrum on multiples of this base length . exactly in this case of sufficiently open 4-sphere billiards the chain structure has been observed ( cf . figure 5.2 - 5.9 in @xcite ) . . the thin light lines indicate the integer multiples of the base length @xmath226 and red dashed lines the multiples of a second base length @xmath225 . one can observe two types of clustering , one very coarse clustering around the multiples of @xmath225 and a much finer clustering around the multiples of @xmath226 . ] we will end this section by using the predictive power of our hypothesis in order to identify a new interesting system which shows the coexistence of two chains . as we only demand ( [ eq : order_func_condition ] ) to hold approximately there should be examples for which there are different compatible base lengths and order functions , e.g. the surface @xmath240 . as can be seen in the length spectrum can be either interpreted as forming clusters at multiples of the base length @xmath225 or at multiples of the base length @xmath226 . the hypothesis thus predicts two different chain structures , one where the resonances are spaced by a distance of @xmath241 and another one with a larger spacing of @xmath242 . as for @xmath225 the approximation ( [ eq : order_func_condition ] ) holds much worse then for @xmath226 our hypothesis predicts that the resonance chains belonging to @xmath225 are much more twisted then the chains belonging to @xmath226 . as figures [ fig : rot_res_12_12_13 ] and [ fig : rot_res_12_12_13_long ] show , all these predictions are observed in the resonance structure . choosing the order function ( [ eq : funnel_order_func ] ) with @xmath243 which corresponds to the base length @xmath225 we observe strongly twisted resonance chains as indicated by the red circles in the left part of . the generalized spectrum @xmath244 of this order function creates this kind of chains by the rotating spectral values and if one connects neighboring resonances on this chain by the continuous line which is suggested by the chain structure , the generalized spectral value moves along the unit circle . this verifies that the chains are described by @xmath210 . choosing , however , the order function ( [ eq : funnel_order_func ] ) with @xmath245 which is the corresponding choice for the base length @xmath226 we obtain a generalized zeta function which describes a second structure of resonance chains , on which the resonance distances are much larger and which are much straighter ( see ) . in the complex plane are marked by crosses . the red circles highlight the resonances on the chain , which belongs to the base length @xmath225 . the colored dots between the two resonances @xmath246 and @xmath247 represent a discrete interpolation between the two resonances following the line suggested by the resonance chains . right : generalized spectrum for the order function as defined in ( [ eq : funnel_order_func ] ) with @xmath243 . the blue crosses represent the spectrum @xmath223 for @xmath196 . by the colored dots we follow the evolution of the spectral value which equals one while interpolating the @xmath95-values between @xmath126 and @xmath193 as indicated by the colored points on the left . ] in the complex plane are marked by crosses . the red circle highlight the resonances on the chain , which belongs to the base length @xmath226 . the colored dots between the two resonances @xmath246 and @xmath248 represent a discrete interpolation between the two resonances following the line suggested by the resonance chains . right : generalized spectrum for the order function as defined in ( [ eq : funnel_order_func ] ) with @xmath243 . the blue crosses represent the spectrum @xmath223 for @xmath249 . by the colored dots we follow the evolution of the spectral value which equals one while interpolating the @xmath95-values between @xmath126 and @xmath193 as indicated by the colored points on the left . ] in this article we presented a unifying approach to the chain structure of quantum resonances , classical ruelle resonances and geometric resonances . we showed at the example of 3-disk systems and schottky surfaces that the resonance chains can be understood in all three cases by means of a generalized zeta function @xmath250 which depends on the choice of an order function @xmath251 on the set of primitive closed classical orbits @xmath55 . the central property of this generalized zeta function is that independent of the choice of the order function the resonances are given by the zeros of zeta function @xmath252 . we showed that if the order function is chosen such that @xmath253 for an arbitrary base length @xmath224 then the second complex variable allows to interpolate between the resonances of one chain . furthermore we demonstrated that the continuous lines where the resonances are found on are given by the projection onto the @xmath95-component of the real analytic variety @xmath254 the existence of an order function that fulfills the condition ( [ eq : of_cond_concl ] ) does of course depend on the structure of the length spectrum of the classical system . this led us to the hypothesis that the existence of resonance chains is directly linked to a clustering of the classical length spectrum that allows us to choose an order function according to ( [ eq : of_cond_concl ] ) . we finally validated this hypothesis by presenting several examples of systems with and without resonance chains . in all cases the resonance chains were found to be linked to a clustering of the length spectrum . furthermore we showed that this new understanding allows to construct scattering systems with a customized resonance chain structure . this control of the resonance chains could be of importance in microdisk cavities where similar resonance chains have already been observed @xcite and where a precise control of the resonance position in the complex plane is of great interest for their application as microdisk lasers . additionally this understanding is crucial for fundamental questions in quantum chaos . in chaotic systems the clear clusters in the length spectrum will only exist for short lengths . for larger lengths the clusters become broader and broader and will finally overlap . however , we required the condition ( [ eq : of_cond_concl ] ) only to hold in the length range which is necessary for the calculation of the resonances in the studied frequency regime . in other words for the existence of resonance chains in a given frequency range , condition ( [ eq : of_cond_concl ] ) only has to hold for the lengths which can be resolved by the planck cells at this frequency . if one still observes resonance chains , then one has to keep in mind that one is not yet at high enough frequencies to resolve the length spectrum in a regime , where the clusters dissolve . this could be especially important for the test of results that are obtained by arguing with phase cancellation such as the conjectures on the improved spectral gaps @xcite finally the study of resonance chains opens a variety of mathematical questions . we numerically observed in this article that the chain structure becomes the clearer the better condition ( [ eq : of_cond_concl ] ) is fulfilled . by studying not just a single system but a whole family of scattering systems , where ( [ eq : of_cond_concl ] ) is increasingly well fulfilled in a certain limit one can then try to prove the existence of resonance chains asymptotically in this limit . furthermore one can try to give precise , simple formulas for the location of these chains . for symmetric 3-disk systems this limit would correspond to large @xmath23-values and for schottky surfaces to large funnel widths . for the latter case , first results into this direction will be presented in @xcite . we are grateful to ulrich kuhl for many interesting stimulating discussions and detailed feedback concerning this work . furthermore we thank bruno eckhardt , david borthwick , stphane nonnenmacher , pablo ramacher and gabriel rivire for discussions and comments . this work was supported by the project anr 2009 - 12 methchaos . s.b . acknowledges financial support by dfg via the project for760 and t.w . by the german national academic foundation in this appendix we will recall the derivation of the product form ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_product_form ] ) from the definition of the dynamical zeta function as it has been defined in ( [ eq : dynamical_zeta_flat ] ) by the flat trace @xmath255 for each fixed point @xmath81 the jacobian is a hyperbolic , symplectic @xmath256 matrix and it thus has two real eigenvalues @xmath82 and @xmath257 with @xmath258 and the determinant can be written as @xmath259 where for the last equality we used that a positive integer @xmath163 can be written as @xmath260 different sums of two positive integers @xmath261 and @xmath95 . as a next step we can treat the double sum @xmath262 which is simply the sum over all fixed points of @xmath50 for arbitrary length @xmath56 . first we note that the iterated product of the potential function @xmath263 as well as the instable eigenvalue @xmath82 do not depend on the choice of the fixed point in a fixed orbit @xmath264 . additionally we see that if an orbit of length @xmath265 is a @xmath12-times iterate of a primitive orbit of length @xmath60 , then the orbit contains @xmath60 fixed points and as well the iterated product as the instable eigenvalue are the @xmath12-th power of the values from the primitive orbit @xmath266 this allows us to write the double sum @xmath262 as a double sum over all primitive periodic orbits and their repetitions @xmath267 and we obtain @xmath268^{k+1}&\nonumber \\ & = \prod_{k\geq0}\prod_{p\in p}\left[1-z^{n_p}\frac{v_{n_p}(x)}{|\lambda_{n_p}|\lambda_{n_p}^{k}}\right]^{k+1}&\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we used the taylor series of @xmath269 in the last equality . in this appendix we will shortly recall how the resonance spectrum on schottky surfaces is usually calculated ( see @xcite for more details ) and what modifications have to be performed for the calculation of the generalized zeta function and the generalized spectrum . usually the resonance spectrum is obtained by taylor expanding ( [ eq : bs_dyn_zeta_fixpoint_formula ] ) in @xmath44 around zero @xmath270 the taylor coefficients are then explicitly given by ( * ? ? ? * proposition 8) @xmath271 where @xmath272 are all @xmath261-partitions of @xmath163 , i.e. all @xmath261-tuples of integers whose sum equals @xmath163 . the numerical task in order to calculate these coefficients then consists in calculating the stabilities @xmath273 of sufficiently many fixed points . for a 3-funneled schottky surface @xmath154 this can efficiently be done using the generators of the corresponding schottky group and a symbolic dynamic . for @xmath154 the generators can be written as @xmath274 where the parameter @xmath22 is chosen such that @xmath275 and as usual one writes @xmath276 and @xmath277 . if we then define the set of words of length @xmath0 by @xmath278 then we can define for each @xmath279 the hyperbolic isometry @xmath280 one then can easily show from the definition of the bowen - series maps ( * ? ? ? * section 15.2 ) that for each @xmath281 there is exactly one @xmath282 and @xmath283 which allows an efficient calculation of ( [ eq : b_k_bowen_series ] ) and thus of @xmath284 . for the calculation of @xmath250 one analogously has to taylor - expand the zeta function in @xmath44 around zero @xmath285 then one has to calculate the new taylor coefficients @xmath286 . as we want to use the word coding to calculate the lengths of the geodesics or the stabilities @xmath273 , respectively , we first have to transfer the order function @xmath287 to an order function on @xmath288 . this transformation can be obtained via the correspondence between closed geodesics on @xmath154 and fixed points of @xmath183 ( * ? ? ? * proposition 15.5 ) . using this identification one calculates that the order function as defined in ( [ eq : funnel_order_func ] ) is then given by @xmath289 where @xmath290 the bowen - series order function @xmath291 can be translated much more easily . from its definition in section [ sec : intro_schottky ] it immediately follows , that @xmath292 for all @xmath293 . using the order function on the words as well as the identification of fixed points and words , equation ( [ eq : bs_dyn_zeta_fixpoint_formula ] ) can be written as @xmath294 starting with ( [ eq : gen_zeta ] ) and reversing the argumentation of [ app : product_form ] the generalized zeta function @xmath250 can be written as @xmath295 an analogous calculation to those in ( * ? ? ? * proposition 8) then gives us the formula for the taylor coefficients @xmath296 the stabilities @xmath297 can be calculated by the generators @xmath298 of the schottky group as described above and in order to simplify the combinatorial task of building together the taylor coefficients @xmath286 from these stabilities we can use the same recurrence trick as presented in @xcite . we therefore write @xmath299 and @xmath300 we can then use the recurrence relations @xmath301 the only difference in calculating the generalized zeta function compared to the dynamical zeta function of the bowen - series maps thus consists in the modified formula for the functions @xmath302 . note that as @xmath250 is analytic the taylor coefficients @xmath286 decay superexponentially in @xmath163 and theoretically one can compute @xmath250 for arbitrary @xmath303 . practically , however , the convergence becomes worse and worse the smaller @xmath304 and the bigger @xmath65 become . especially for order functions ( [ eq : funnel_order_func ] ) with larger values of @xmath305 as they appeared for example for the surfaces @xmath212 the convergence depends very strongly on @xmath65 . this implies that a reliable calculation of @xmath306 is only possible for @xmath44 values which are slightly greater then @xmath24 . in terms of the generalized spectrum this implies that the numerical calculation is only possible for @xmath44 slightly smaller then @xmath24 . as the interesting region for the understanding of the resonance chains is , however , the unit circle , this is no severe problem for the numerical investigations presented in this article . the topological pressure of a 3-disk system is a function @xmath307 of a positive parameter @xmath308 that describes the convergence behavior of certain zeta functions . writing @xmath309 the topological pressure of the 3-disk system can be defined @xcite to be the real number @xmath307 such that @xmath310 is absolutely convergent for @xmath311 . this directly implies that @xmath312 has no zeros for @xmath313 and that @xmath314 has no zeros for @xmath315 . for a symmetric 3-disk system with @xmath1 this value of the topological pressure is given by @xmath316 consequently all zeros of the gutzwiller - voros zeta function @xmath317 with @xmath318 are automatically zeros of the fredholm determinant @xmath319 and can thus be interpreted by the spectrum of the transfer operator @xmath123 . note that all the numerical investigations presented in this article are within this @xmath95-range . Abstract:
[ "in many non - integrable open systems in physics and mathematics resonances have been found to be surprisingly ordered along curved lines in the complex plane . in this article we provide a unifying approach to these resonance chains by generalizing dynamical zeta functions . by means of a detailed numerical study we show that these generalized zeta functions explain the mechanism that creates the chains of quantum resonance and classical ruelle resonances for 3-disk systems as well as geometric resonances on schottky surfaces . we also present a direct system - intrinsic definition of the continuous lines on which the resonances are strung together as a projection of an analytic variety . additionally , this approach shows that the existence of resonance chains is directly related to a clustering of the classical length spectrum on multiples of a base length . finally , this link is used to construct new examples where several different structures of resonance chains coexist ." ]
11,909
11,909
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: single - transverse spin asymmetries ( ssas ) in high - energy collisions with one transversely polarized hadron are important phenomena that have been observed for more than three decades in various physical processes @xcite . in these processes , the observed final - state hadrons show an asymmetric distribution in a plane perpendicular to the beam direction when the transversely polarized hadron scatters off an unpolarized hadron ( or a virtual photon ) . the ssa is defined as @xmath2 , the ratio of the difference and the sum of ( differential ) cross sections when the hadron s spin vector , @xmath3 , is flipped . recent experimental measurements of ssas in polarized semi - inclusive lepton - nucleon deep inelastic scattering ( sidis ) @xcite and in hadronic collisions @xcite have renewed the theoretical interest in ssas and in understanding their roles in hadron structure and quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) . although it was realized a long time ago @xcite that perturbative qcd can be used to study the effects of transverse spin , the size of the observed asymmetries came as a surprise and has posed a challenge for researchers in this field @xcite . within a model calculation @xcite , brodsky , hwang , and schmidt showed that the final state interaction in deep inelastic scattering ( dis ) can generate a phase required for a nonzero ssa in sidis . it was later realized that this final state interaction can be factorized into the gauge link of the gauge invariant transverse momentum dependent ( tmd ) quark distributions @xcite . the nonvanishing ssa obtained in ref . @xcite is a consequence of the existence of a naively time - reversal - odd tmd quark distribution , the so - called sivers function @xcite . when applying the same calculation to the drell - yan production of lepton pairs at hadron colliders , the final state interaction in sidis becomes an initial state interaction in drell - yan , and the phase changes sign , which leads to a prediction of a sign change in the ssas between these two processes @xcite . this nontrivial `` universality '' property associated with the tmd parton distributions is the consequence of gauge interactions in qcd @xcite , and of the qcd factorization theorems for these two processes @xcite . experimental tests of this prediction will be crucial for our understanding of the origin of ssas in qcd @xcite . in ref . @xcite , it was proposed to study the sivers functions by means of a ssa in azimuthal - angular correlations of two jets produced nearly back - to - back at hadron colliders . measurements of this ssa for dijet production have begun at rhic @xcite , complementing the measurements in sidis . unlike the sidis or drell - yan process , dijet production at hadron colliders involves both initial and final state interactions that may produce the phase needed for a nonvanishing ssa . consequently , the sign and the size of the asymmetry will depend on the relative strength of these interactions . following the previous works on sidis and drell - yan , the authors of ref . @xcite developed a systematic approach to describe the role of initial- and final - state interactions in generating ssas in hadronic collisions , and they found that summing all initial / final state interactions into the gauge link of the tmd parton distributions leads to a very complicated functional form of the gauge link . in particular , the tmd parton distributions studied in dijet correlations in hadronic scattering will have no connection to those in the sidis and drell - yan processes , because their definitions are completely different @xcite . one then has to question the universality of the tmd parton distributions , and the predictive power of perturbative qcd calculations , which relies on comparing physical observables with the same factorized long - distance physics while having different perturbatively calculable short - distance dynamics . in ref . @xcite , we briefly reported a new result for the ssa in dijet production in hadronic collisions in the twist-3 efremov - teryaev - qiu - sterman ( etqs ) approach @xcite . we considered the spin - dependent cross section , @xmath4 , for the process @xmath5 with the jet momenta @xmath6 and @xmath7 . when both @xmath8 and @xmath9 , the transverse components of the momenta @xmath10 and @xmath11 , respectively , are much larger than @xmath12 , a nonvanishing @xmath13 can be generated by the etqs mechanism in the collinear factorization approach . in this framework , the ssas are attributed to the spin - dependent twist - three quark - gluon correlation functions , which correspond to a quantum interference between different partonic scattering amplitudes . since the incoming partons are approximated to be collinear to the corresponding incoming hadrons in this approach , the momentum imbalance of the two jets is generated by producing a three - parton final - state . @xcite , we calculated the contribution from initial - state gluon radiation to @xmath13 in the kinematic region where @xmath14 . we presented the final result for the leading contributions to @xmath13 in the expansion of the partonic scattering in @xmath15 involving a hard @xmath16 subprocess . in this paper , we will provide the detailed derivations of this result , and we will also present the full contributions from all other partonic subprocesses at the same order . we find that although both initial - state and final - state interaction lead to a nonvanishing ssa , the final - state interactions give the dominant contributions to @xmath13 . we therefore expect that the ssa in dijet production will have the same sign as the sivers asymmetry in sidis . we find that at leading order in the @xmath15 expansion , the perturbatively calculated partonic parts can be further factorized into a single - scale ( @xmath8 ) hard part and perturbatively generated tmd parton distributions with transverse momenta @xmath17 . we also find that our perturbatively calculated result is equal to the leading - order term in the @xmath18 expansion of the following generalized tmd factorization formula @xcite : @xmath19_c\ , \delta^{(2)}(\vec{k}_{1\perp}+\vec{k}_{2\perp}+ \vec{\lambda}_\perp-\vec{q}_\perp ) \ , , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath20 runs over all parton flavors , @xmath21 and @xmath22 are partonic hard and soft factors , respectively , and the @xmath23_c$ ] represents a trace in color space between the hard and soft factors due to the color flow into the jets @xcite . the hard factor in eq . ( [ e4 ] ) only depends on the single hard scale @xmath8 in terms of partonic mandelstam variables of the reaction @xmath24 : @xmath25 with @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 and @xmath29 the rapidities of the two jets . in eq . ( [ e4 ] ) , @xmath30 and @xmath31 denote the transverse - spin dependent tmd quark distributions ( known as the sivers function ) and the unpolarized tmd quark distribution , respectively ; these tmd parton distributions were chosen to follow their definitions in the semi - inclusive dis process . for example , for a polarized proton with momentum @xmath32 with @xmath33 and transverse spin vector @xmath34 , the tmd distribution for quark flavor @xmath35 can be defined through the decomposition of the following matrix element @xcite , @xmath36 \ , \label{e3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath37 is a hadronic mass scale introduced to keep the tmd distributions @xmath38 and @xmath39 at the same mass dimension , and the gauge link @xmath40 is defined in a covariant gauge as @xmath41 with the path link extended to @xmath42 . @xmath43 is a vector conjugate to the momentum vector @xmath10 . since we will work in a covariant gauge throughout this paper , the vector @xmath43 could be chosen to be a light - cone vector with @xmath44 and @xmath45 . an off - light - cone vector ( @xmath46 ) will have to be used when high order corrections are taken into account @xcite . if we work in a singular gauge , like the light - cone gauge , an additional gauge link at the spatial infinity ( @xmath47 ) will have to be included in order to ensure the gauge invariance of the above definitions @xcite . we have chosen tmd parton distributions defined in sidis because of the dominance of final - state interactions . choosing tmd parton distributions defined according to the drell - yan process would change the sign of the partonic hard factors , but not affect the overall sign of the physical cross section . we note that the various factors in eq . ( [ e3 ] ) , apart from being functions of transverse momentum , also depend on the renormalization and factorization scales , and especially on the gluon rapidity cut - off when higher - order corrections are taken into account . the latter dependence is governed by the collins - soper evolution equation @xcite , which leads to a resummation of large logarithms of the form @xmath48 $ ] in the perturbative series @xcite . in order to evaluate the ssa for dijet production , we also calculate in this paper the contributions from initial - state gluon radiation to the spin - averaged dijet cross section , @xmath49 , in the same kinematic region where @xmath50 . using the collinear factorization approach , we find that like the spin - dependent case , the leading contribution in the @xmath15 expansion of the perturbatively calculated partonic scatterings can be further factorized into a hard part at a single - scale @xmath8 and perturbatively generated unpolarized tmd parton distributions with transverse momenta @xmath17 . our leading contribution in the @xmath15 expansion is equal to the leading - order term of the following tmd factorization formula @xcite , @xmath51_c \ , \delta^{(2)}(\vec{k}_{a\perp}+\vec{k}_{b\perp } + \lambda_\perp-\vec{q}_\perp ) \ ; , \label{e2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the superscript `` @xmath52 '' indicates the scattering of an unpolarized beam off an unpolarized target / beam . for consistency , we again express the factorization formula in terms of tmd parton distributions defined in the sidis process . actually , the unpolarized tmd parton distributions defined in sidis and the drell - yan process are identical , because the unpolarized parton distributions are invariant under the naive - time - reversal transformation . a key feature of any qcd factorization is that the perturbatively calculated short - distance hard factors should not be sensitive to details of the _ factorized _ long distance physics . in this paper , we will derive all short - distance hard factors in eqs . ( [ e4]),([e2 ] ) also by using the brodsky - hwang - schmidt model for ssas @xcite . we find that the hard - scattering factors derived in this model are in fact the same as those derived in the collinear factorization approach , despite of the clear difference in the treatment of the nucleon . both the spin - averaged and the spin - dependent cross sections calculated in this model are therefore consistent with the generalized factorization formulas in eqs . ( [ e4]),([e2 ] ) . to fully investigate the above factorization formalism , we would have to consider the contributions from gluon interactions and radiations in all possible regions of the phase space , and to all orders in perturbation theory , which is not what we are trying to do in this paper . instead , as a step to test the above factorization formalism , we will study the contribution at the first non - trivial order with a single gluon radiated nearly parallel to one of the incident nucleons . from this study , we will be able to show how to factorize this gluon into the tmd parton distributions of the incoming nucleons , and to verify the definition of the tmd parton distributions used in the generalized factorization formulas . our first order calculation at @xmath53 clearly shows the factorization of a hard part at @xmath54 and that the radiation of a collinear gluon can be absorbed into the relevant tmd parton distributions . however , our work does not address the factorization between the various tmd parton distributions at the scale @xmath55 . our calculation should be regarded merely as a `` necessary condition '' for such a factorization to hold . since the predictive power of perturbative - qcd calculations involving measured hadrons relies on factorization , a full proof or disproof of this factorization remains an important challenge @xcite . the rest of this paper is organized as follows . in sec . ii , we calculate the partonic hard factors in a simple model - inspired approach . using the quark - diquark model for the proton and the brodsky - hwang - schmidt model for ssas , we extract the hard factors by the factorization of the tmd parton distributions . we find that the hard factors for the unpolarized scattering in eq . ( [ e4 ] ) are identical to the partonic differential cross sections @xmath56 , and the ones for the transverse - spin dependent cross section are different due to the initial- and final - state color interactions . in sec . iii , we calculate the ssa in the collinear factorization approach , and show that the collinear gluons parallel to the polarized proton can be factorized into the sivers function , while those parallel to the unpolarized proton can be factorized into the unpolarized tmd parton distribution . we also demonstrate that the hard factors calculated in both approaches are the same and independent of the details of the factorized long - distance physics . in sec . iv , we extend our formulas to the @xmath9-weighted ssa , and compare with previous results in the literature . finally , we summarize our paper in section v. in this section , we will calculate the hard factors at @xmath57 in the generalized factorization formulas in eqs . ( [ e4]),([e2 ] ) , based on a model in which an energetic parton scatters off a nucleon that is made of a quark and a scalar diquark @xcite . we will follow the approach of brodsky et al . @xcite and incorporate the correct color interactions between the gauge boson and the scalar diquark in the proton wave function . we extract the hard factor by factorizing the model - sensitive long - distance physics from the differential cross section into the parton distributions . because the model - dependence was factorized into the parton distributions , the extracted hard factors resulting from our calculations do not depend on how the nucleon couples to the partons , and therefore , should be model - independent . " represents the color - index for the gauge boson , and @xmath58 the color - indices for the quark and/or the di - quark . _ , width=340 ] -0.4 cm in this subsection , we derive the hard factors @xmath59 for the unpolarized differential cross section in eq . ( [ e2 ] ) . we will first give a simple example of how the hard factors may be extracted in the context of the quark - diquark model of @xcite . we will also give a more general approach based on power counting techniques to calculate the hard factors directly from partonic diagrams . to specify the quark - diquark model of the proton , we give in fig . [ f2 ] graphical rules for the vertex coupling the quark - diquark to the proton , and the vertex coupling the diquark to a gauge boson . in order to correctly take into account the color degree of freedom of the strong interactions , we included proper color factors for these vertices . using this quark - diquark model to extract the hard factors not only verifies the fact that the hard factors are independent of the dynamics at the scale of the proton , but also provides a relatively simpler demonstration of how to factorize the cross sections into the tmd quark distributions and corresponding hard factors at the leading order in the @xmath15 expansion . in this particular model , we calculate the cross section for an energetic parton of momentum @xmath60 scattering off a parton of momentum @xmath61 from the ( modeled ) nucleon , producing two jets of momenta @xmath62 and @xmath63 plus an unobserved particle with momentum @xmath64 in the final state , as shown in fig . [ f3 ] , where the feynman diagram represents the contribution from a quark - quark scattering channel : @xmath16 with the quark @xmath11 from the nucleon . we extract the hard factors by comparing the calculated cross section with the factorized formulas in either eq . ( [ e4 ] ) or ( [ e2 ] ) . the diquark in the final state has a transverse momentum @xmath65 to balance the small momentum imbalance of the two jets , @xmath66 . channel , for the unpolarized cross section . _ , width=207 ] -0.4 cm according to the factorization formulas in eqs . ( [ e4]),([e2 ] ) , the transverse momentum imbalance @xmath9 of the two jets is a consequence of adding the transverse momenta of the two active partons and from the soft factor . since the incoming quark in this model calculation has only a longitudinal momentum component , its transverse as well as longitudinal momentum distributions should be given by delta functions , @xmath67 similarly , at this order , the soft factor is also a delta function of the transverse momentum , i.e. , @xmath68 . therefore , the only contribution to the transverse momentum imbalance of the two jets comes from the transverse momentum of the quark emerging from the nucleon , and the generalized factorization formulas can be reduced to @xmath69 for the unpolarized cross section , and @xmath70 for the single transverse - spin dependent cross section . in order to extract the hard factor from the differential cross sections in eqs . ( [ e7]),([e8 ] ) , we will need to calculate the tmd quark ( unpolarized and sivers ) distributions within the same model . they are given by the diagrams shown in fig . [ f4 ] , and are available @xcite . we can summarize their results as follows : @xmath71 \ , \label{e9}\\ q_t^{\rm sidis}(x , k_\perp)&=&c_f\frac{g_n^2\alpha_s}{16\pi^3}\frac{(1-x)(m_q+xm_p ) } { \lambda^2(x , k_\perp^2)}\frac{m_p}{k_\perp^2 } \ln\frac{\lambda^2(x , k_\perp^2)}{\lambda^2(x,0 ) } \ , \label{e10}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath72 and @xmath73 , and @xmath74 , @xmath75 and @xmath76 are masses for the proton , the quark and the gauge boson , respectively . in the above formulas , we have included the color - factors arising from the vertices described in fig . [ f2 ] . -0.4 cm we now present details of the calculation of the contribution of the quark - quark scattering channel @xmath77 to the unpolarized scattering cross section . we also provide full results for all other channels , which can be derived similarly . the feynman diagram for @xmath77 has been shown in fig . [ f3 ] . in the limit @xmath78 , the two final - state jets have approximately the same transverse momentum , i.e. , @xmath79 . we define the following kinematic variables : @xmath80 where @xmath81 . from these , we immediately find the incident partons momentum fractions @xmath82 and @xmath83 , and the scalar diquark s momentum can be written as @xmath84 in the evaluation of the cross sections , we use the power counting analysis @xcite , keep only the leading power contributions and neglect all higher order corrections in @xmath85 , where @xmath86 represents any lower mass scale like @xmath9 , @xmath74 , @xmath75 and @xmath76 . in this limit , the differential cross section for fig . [ f3 ] can be written as @xmath87 is the scattering amplitude for the diagram . expanding the above delta function for the phase space integral of @xmath64 , we find that in the leading power contributions @xcite , @xmath88 where the `` plus '' distribution follows the usual definition @xcite . this delta function will help to simplify our calculations for contributions from different kinematic regions of @xmath64 . for example , if @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath89 , which means @xmath90 , we only have a contribution from the first term of the above expansion , which also implies @xmath91 in this limit . furthermore , the quark propagator in fig . [ f3 ] reads @xmath92 where @xmath93 is defined above after eq . ( [ e10 ] ) , and is order of @xmath94 . combining this propagator with the delta function expansion , we find that indeed only the first term in the delta function contributes . neglecting all higher order terms in @xmath85 , we obtain the amplitude squared for fig . [ f3 ] as @xmath95 \ , \ ] ] where @xmath96 is the color - factor , and the hadronic mandelstam variables @xmath97 , @xmath98 , and @xmath99 are defined as @xmath81 , @xmath100 , @xmath101 . in the limit @xmath91 , these variables can be related to the partonic mandelstam variables as : @xmath102 , @xmath103 , @xmath104 at @xmath105 , and we will have @xmath106 . substituting the above results into the differential cross section , we obtain , @xmath107 \frac{2\pi\alpha_s^2}{\hat s^2}\ , \frac{\hat s^2+\hat u^2}{\hat t^2}\ , \delta(x_b-1 ) \ .\ ] ] comparing this result with eq . ( [ e7 ] ) , and identifying the tmd parton distribution @xmath108 defined in eq . ( [ e9 ] ) , we extract the partonic hard factor for the differential cross section from the diagram in fig . 3 as@xmath109 where @xmath110 are the partonic mandelstam variables defined before . this hard factor is just the well - known differential cross section @xmath111 for the partonic process @xmath16 . the hard factors for all other partonic channels can be calculated similarly , and they are all identical to the partonic differential cross section @xmath112 , and collected in appendix a. instead of calculating the differential cross section directly , we now show how to use the power counting techniques @xcite to analyze the contribution from all partonic channels and to demonstrate the factorization of the hard factors . we then apply this approach to calculate the contributions to the spin dependent differential cross section . we again first consider the simple example of the @xmath16 channel . the jet transverse momentum @xmath8 is the only hard scale , while all other momentum scales , such as the imbalance @xmath9 of the two jets and all other mass scales @xmath74 , @xmath75 and @xmath76 , are relatively soft and much smaller than the hard scale . we expand the scattering amplitude squared in the small parameter @xmath15 . using power counting techniques , we identify the leading power contributions and match them to the momentum regions of the unobserved ( or integrated ) parton of momentum @xmath64 . in our current model , where a parton of momentum @xmath113 scatters off a nucleon of momentum @xmath89 , the leading power contribution is from the region when @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath89 . if @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath113 , the contribution is power suppressed , because the denominator of the quark propagator @xmath114 will be of order @xmath115 , instead of @xmath116 as is the case when @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath89 . into the tmd quark distribution of the proton and the hard factor represented by the partonic scattering feynman diagram.__,width=491 ] -0.4 cm when the momentum @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath89 , the quark propagator in fig . [ f3 ] has a virtuality @xmath117 , which is much smaller than the hard scale @xmath118 . compared to the short distance physics in the partonic scattering taking place at the time scale @xmath119 , the incident quark of momentum @xmath120 is long - lived , and the contribution from this subprocess can be separated into two parts : the parton distribution part relevant at the soft scale @xmath121 and the hard partonic part at the scale @xmath122 , representing the long distance and short distance physics , respectively . we demonstrate this factorization in fig . [ f5 ] , where the contribution to the differential cross section from the process in fig . [ f3 ] is factorized into a parton distribution multiplied by a hard factor . we can further separate the hard factor into a partonic scattering amplitude squared stripped of any color , and the color - factor @xmath123 . in this way we can take into account the color decomposition of the subprocess in the case of unpolarized scattering . this is trivial for this particularly simple partonic channel , but becomes a convenience for the more complicated ones . after subtraction of the parton distribution from the differential cross section , the hard factor in fig . [ f5 ] can then be written as @xmath124 where @xmath125 represents a common factor and is introduced to simplify the notation , and @xmath126 . this of course agrees with the above result in eq . ( [ hqqp ] ) . most importantly , it demonstrates that the hard factor is model independent . it only depends on the partonic scattering cross section and the color - factor associated with the partonic diagram . it does not depend on the model we used to describe how the nucleon couples to the quark and diquark . -0.4 cm a non - vanishing single transverse - spin asymmetry requires initial / final state interactions generating a phase . because all initial and final partonic states relevant for dijet production are colored , both initial and final state interactions have to be taken into account for a complete result . in fig . [ f6 ] , we show all possible diagrams with gluon exchange between the diquark and the hard scattering part which may contribute to the ssa for the dijet - correlation , again for the case of an underlying @xmath16 process . the initial and final state interaction diagrams in fig . [ f6](a - c ) contribute to a soft gluon pole , which corresponds to the quark sivers function contribution we are considering in this paper . however , the gluon interaction with the internal gluon propagator shown in fig . [ f6](d ) does not contribute to a soft gluon pole , but to a soft fermion pole @xcite . this soft fermion pole contribution is not related to the quark sivers function and will not be discussed in this paper . therefore , in the following calculations , we will only consider the contributions from the diagrams ( a)-(c ) . we will follow the same factorization approach that was used in last subsection for calculating the hard factors for the unpolarized cross section . we use the power counting method to factorize the additional gluon interaction between the hard scattering and the diquark into the sivers parton distribution for every partonic channel . as discussed above , the leading power contribution is from the region of phase space where the outgoing diquark momentum @xmath64 is parallel to the polarized proton @xmath89 : @xmath127 , @xmath128 and @xmath129 . to obtain a leading power contribution , the gluon momentum @xmath130 also needs to be parallel to @xmath89 . this is so because the diquark propagator in fig . [ f6 ] reads @xmath131 which will be power suppressed unless @xmath132 . this result can also be derived from the existence of a `` pinch '' singularity in the @xmath133 integral over the quark propagator of momentum @xmath134 and the diquark propagator of momentum @xmath135 @xcite . since the momentum @xmath130 of the gluon is parallel to @xmath89 , its polarization will also be proportional to @xmath89 , because the gauge - boson - scalar vertex is proportional to @xmath136 , as shown in fig . therefore , the gluon attaching to the initial- or final - state quark is longitudinally polarized , i.e. , its polarization is along its momentum . because of this , we can further decouple the gluon interaction with the external particles by using the eikonal approximation . for example , for the diagram with final - state interaction in fig . [ f6](b ) , the gluon interaction part can be reduced to @xmath137 where the gamma matrix @xmath138 appears because of the interaction with a longitudinally polarized gluon , and where @xmath35 is the color - index for this gluon . in the above derivations , we have only kept the leading power contributions . for ( 1,2,4,5 ) where @xmath35 is the color index for the gluon with momentum @xmath130 and @xmath58 are indices for the quark lines ; @xmath139 for ( 3,6 ) where @xmath140 are indices for incoming and outgoing gluons.__,width=529 ] -0.4 cm similarly , the initial state interaction in fig . [ f6](a ) and the other final state interaction in fig . [ f6](c ) can be simplified following the same eikonal approximation . the eikonal approximation will give rise to eikonal propagators and vertices . in fig . [ f7 ] , we summarize these eikonalized expressions for all the initial and final state interactions , including the attachments of the longitudinally polarized gluon to a quark or anti - quark line , or to a gluon line as well . the eikonal approximation for quark- and antiquark - gluon interactions with incoming or outgoing momentum can be derived following the above example . for the three - gluon interactions , we can derive the eikonal vertex and propagator by choosing physical polarizations for the external gluons . with this choice , we find the vertex and gluon propagator can be reduced to , for example for fig . [ f7](6 ) : @xmath141\frac{i(-g^{\nu\nu'})}{(p_b+l)^2+i\epsilon}g^{\rho -}\nonumber\\&&\approx \frac{(2p_b+l)^- g_{\mu\nu}}{(p_b+l)^2+i\epsilon}(-if_{abc})=\frac{g}{-l^+-i\epsilon } g_{\mu\nu}(-if_{abc } ) \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used the fact that the incoming gluon is transversely polarized , so that the polarization tensor can be chosen as @xmath142 similarly , we can simplify the longitudinally polarized gluon attachment to the outgoing gluon line as shown in fig . [ f7](3 ) . these eikonal propagators and the associated vertices can be absorbed into the parton distribution for the polarized proton , after factorizing the diagram . the only difference between this factorization and the one for the unpolarized scattering is the color - flow , because of the additional gluon exchange between the diquark and the hard part . the color - flow is sensitive to the difference between initial- and final - state interactions and depends on the specific partonic subprocess . therefore , the generalized factorization would immediately fail if the eikonal propagators and associated vertices , which are absorbed into the tmd distributions , were sensitive to the process dependent color flows . however , at the leading order , one can always attribute the color - flow to the partonic hard part and keep the corresponding tmd distribution insensitive to it . therefore , as compared to the unpolarized case ( see fig . [ f5 ] ) , for the single - spin - dependent cross section we shall obtain a more complicated factorization . for the case of the three diagrams of fig . [ f6 ] the factorization is shown in fig . the contribution from each diagram can be factorized into the sivers function and the hard partonic scattering amplitude squared , multiplied by a color - factor that takes into account the color - flow of the initial / final state interaction . however , in order to verify the generalized factorization beyond the leading order , one would have to show that additional initial - state as well as final - state gluon interactions could also be factorized into a sum of terms , each of which is factorized into a product of higher order tmd distributions and corresponding color factors and partonic hard parts . for example , to verify the factorization at the next - to - leading order with two eikonal gluon interactions , one would have to show that the initial- and final - state interactions can be factorized into the same color factors and the lowest order hard parts as in fig . 8 , multiplied by the corresponding second order tmd distribution . we will leave the detailed study of the generalized factorization at higher orders to a future publication . . _ , width=529 ] -0.4 cm at least to the leading order , the extracted color factors @xmath143 with @xmath144 in fig . [ f8 ] are insensitive to the long - distance physics . that is , they do not depend on how the quarks and the gluon couple to the nucleon . this is because the factorization of the color - flow between the hard partonic part and the tmd part results in a color configuration connecting an incoming and an outgoing quark ( with color indices @xmath145 ) and a gluon ( with color @xmath35 ) . the only possible color structure to describe this connection is @xmath146 , due to @xmath147 invariance and the wigner - eckart theorem . therefore , one can reduce all the color matrices from the hard part to a simple color matrix @xmath146 , and the coefficient will be exactly the color - factor in the factorization formula . in this way , the extracted color - factor can not depend on the bottom part of the diagram describing the coupling of the quarks and the gluon to the nucleon , but will only depend on the color - flow in the hard partonic diagrams with an additional gluon insertion . for example , the color factors appearing in fig . [ f8 ] can be derived in the following way , @xmath148 where the color - matrices on the left side of the equations come from the partonic diagrams with one gluon attachment to the initial- or final - state quark line . the extracted color - factor @xmath149 is for the initial - state interaction , and @xmath150 and @xmath151 are for the final - state interactions on the lines with the momentum @xmath62 and @xmath63 , respectively . in the factorization shown in fig . [ f8 ] , the leading order sivers functions for all three diagrams are the same . this is because we normalize all eikonal vertices to the one used in the calculations of the sivers function in sidis ( shown in fig . the difference from the initial or final state interaction effects is summarized into the relevant color - factors . for other partonic channels , it is in some cases necessary to introduce an extra sign when the eikonal propagator contributes with an opposite phase compared to that in the sivers function in sidis . for example , the eikonal propagators in the diagrams ( 2,5,6 ) of fig . [ f7 ] contribute an opposite sign , whereas those of ( 1,3,4 ) contribute the same sign as in sidis . because all the initial and final state interactions in fig . [ f8 ] contribute the same sign , there is no sign change for their color - factors . another important point is that the partonic scattering amplitude squared is the same for all the three diagrams in fig . it can be calculated directly from the relevant feynman rules for the partonic diagrams and is also the same as the one for unpolarized scattering given above . after factorizing out the sivers function from the cross section contributions for the diagrams in fig . [ f8 ] , the color factors for the three diagrams can then be summed to give the final result for the hard factor for the @xmath16 subprocess : @xmath152h_{qq'\to qq'}= \frac{\alpha_s^2\pi}{\hat s^2}\frac{n_c^2 - 5}{4n_c^2}\frac{2(\hat s^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat t^2 } \ , \label{hqq}\ ] ] where @xmath153 has been defined above after eq . ( [ hqu ] ) . the above derivations can be extended to all other partonic channels involving the quark sivers function . they can also be extended to the case of sub - processes initiated by the gluon sivers function for which , however , more color - structures ( like @xmath154 and @xmath155 for the three gluon coupling to the nucleon state ) will emerge @xcite . in this paper , we will focus on the processes with a quark sivers function , which include all quark - quark and quark - antiquark scattering processes , such as @xmath16 calculated above , @xmath156 , @xmath157 , @xmath158 and @xmath159 , as well as the quark - gluon process @xmath160 and quark - antiquark annihilation into a gluon pair , @xmath161 . following the above derivations for the @xmath16 process , the hard factors for the unpolarized and single - spin - dependent cross sections for these channels can be summarized by the following master formulas : @xmath162 where @xmath163 labels an individual feynman diagram ( meant as the square of an amplitude or an interference between two amplitudes , see below ) with @xmath164 the associated expression for the hard factor . @xmath165 is the color - factor for the unpolarized cross section , @xmath166 for the initial state interaction for the single - spin dependent cross section , and @xmath167 and @xmath168 for the final state interactions when the gluon attachment is to the lines of momentum @xmath62 and @xmath63 respectively . from the above analysis , we can easily see that the hard factors in eqs . ( [ e29]),([e30 ] ) are model - independent . the model - dependence is removed once we factorize out the unpolarized quark distribution or the sivers function from the differential cross sections . from the above master formulas , the hard factors depend on the partonic scattering amplitude squared , and the color - factors , derived from partonic diagrams with or without the additional gluon attachment . both the color and partonic factors , and therefore the hard factors , are independent of the model for the proton used in our calculation . -0.4 cm .the color - factors and hard cross sections of individual diagrams of fig . [ f9 ] for the quark - quark scattering channels . [ cols="<,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] in summary , in the intermediate transverse momentum region @xmath169 , we will only have leading - power contributions to the derivative terms from the expansion of the delta function for the on - shell condition of the radiated gluon @xmath64 , and when @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath89 . we have shown these diagrams in fig . this part of the contribution is relatively easy to derive , as we mentioned above , by multiplying a factor @xmath170 to the unpolarized cross sections . the only additional involvement is the color factor . we list the color - factors for all diagrams of fig . [ f15 ] in table iv . each of the color factors has a factor @xmath171 . this can be easily seen for the color factors for diagrams @xmath172 , @xmath173 and @xmath174 , for which we have the following simplifications , @xmath175 where @xmath149 , @xmath150 and @xmath151 have been defined above in eqs . ( [ e25]),([e26]),([e27 ] ) . combining these color factors with the squared amplitude calculated in the last subsection for the unpolarized cross section , we find that the contributions to the derivative terms can be factorized into the hard factor given in eq . ( [ hqq ] ) times the derivative terms of the perturbatively generated sivers function for the polarized nucleon in eq . ( [ e38 ] ) . we illustrate this factorization in fig . for example , the derivative contribution from diagram ( @xmath172 ) is factorized into a soft pole diagram contribution to the derivative term in the sivers function where the radiated gluon attaches to the quark line shown in fig . [ f17 ] , multiplied by the color - factor @xmath149 and the partonic amplitude squared for @xmath16 . @xmath173 and @xmath174 will be factorized into the same diagram contribution to the quark sivers function , but with different color - factors @xmath150 and @xmath151 , respectively . the same conclusion holds for all other diagrams . for example , the sum of diagrams ( @xmath176-@xmath177 ) is factorized into a soft pole diagram contribution to the sivers function where the radiated gluon attaches to the gauge link , multiplied by the color factor @xmath149 and the partonic amplitude squared for @xmath16 . is parallel to @xmath89 . this part can be factorized into a soft pole contribution to the perturbatively generated sivers function in polarized hadron @xmath89 . this factorization applies both to the derivative and the non - derivative contributions from the soft poles . the circle with the attached gluon in the feynman diagrams represents all possible gluon attachments . likewise , the gluon attachment to the circle in the sivers function diagram includes the diagrams with gluon attachments to the gauge link and to the quark line.__,width=453 ] -0.4 cm finally , we present the total result for the derivative contribution by the @xmath178 process to the single - spin asymmetry for the dijet - correlation , @xmath179 \nonumber\\ & \times & \frac{\alpha_s}{2\pi^2}\ , \left[-\frac{1}{2n_c}\right ] \int dx\ , \xi \left[x\frac{\partial}{\partial x}t_f(x , x)\right ] \left[1+\xi^2\right ] \ , , \label{x - ssa - d}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the superscript `` d '' indicates the derivative term , and where the single - scale partonic hard part @xmath180 has been defined in eq . ( [ hqq ] ) . the result in eq . ( [ x - ssa - d ] ) indeed reproduces the derivative terms in the first order tmd factorization formula in eq . ( [ e39 ] ) . in addition to the derivative contributions , the soft poles also contribute to the non - derivative terms . one way of calculating the non - derivative terms is to follow the @xmath181-flow in the scattering amplitude squared , summing up all contributions . keeping in mind that @xmath182 , we have to keep the full dependence on @xmath183 and @xmath184 in the calculations . it is easy to keep track of the explicit @xmath185 dependence coming from momentum conservation . in addition , we also need to include the `` indirect '' @xmath185 dependence resulting from kinematic constrains : the on - shell condition of the radiated gluon and the double poles in the final state interactions . for example , the on - shell delta function for the momentum @xmath64 of the radiated gluon requires that the longitudinal momentum component depends on @xmath181 , which will lead to a @xmath181 dependence for the longitudinal momentum fractions of @xmath186 and @xmath187 as well . as mentioned above , if the polarized gluon attaches to the left side of the cut , the radiated gluon will have momentum @xmath188 . since @xmath187 has transverse momentum @xmath183 , the transverse component of @xmath189 will be equal to @xmath190 . furthermore , the minus component of @xmath189 is fixed by momentum conservation to @xmath191 , where the contribution by @xmath192 has been neglected , because it is of order @xmath193 . therefore , @xmath194 does not depend linearly on @xmath181 . the plus component of @xmath189 , on the other hand , will have linear @xmath181 dependence because of the on - shell condition . we therefore parameterize @xmath189 as @xmath195 where we have indicated the term linear in @xmath183 in the plus component of @xmath189 . as mentioned above , the minus component @xmath196 does not depend linearly on @xmath181 and can be determined to be @xmath197 . by using the on - shell condition @xmath198 , we can then obtain the @xmath181-dependent term in the plus component of @xmath189 , and the final parameterization result for @xmath189 is @xmath199 it is easy to check that @xmath198 up to terms quadratic in @xmath183 . from this result , we can also determine the @xmath183-dependence of the plus components of @xmath186 and @xmath187 . for example , @xmath187 can be directly calculated from momentum conservation , and we find @xmath200p_a^\mu+k_{2\perp}^\mu \ , \label{e76}\ ] ] where the minus component of @xmath187 has again been neglected . we next obtain the parameterization for @xmath186 by @xmath201 , where @xmath202 is determined by the pole and will be different for different poles . for the initial state interaction , the pole @xmath203 gives @xmath204 , and the longitudinal momentum fraction does not depend on the linear term in @xmath181 . however , for the final state interaction with gluon attachment to the line with momentum @xmath62 , the pole will be given by @xmath205 , and the plus component of @xmath202 will depend on @xmath181 through @xmath206 . similarly , the final state interaction with @xmath63 will lead to @xmath207 . in this way , the parameterizations for @xmath186 and @xmath202 will vary for different poles , whereas that for @xmath187 will always remain the same . this is because the parameterization of @xmath187 comes from the on - shell condition for the radiated gluon , which is not sensitive to the location of the poles . when the polarized gluon attaches to the right of the cut lines , on the other hand , it is @xmath186 that is determined by the on - shell condition for the radiated gluon , @xmath208 . following the same method as above , we find @xmath209p_a^\mu+k_{1\perp}^\mu \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] furthermore , in this case @xmath210 , with @xmath202 determined from the position of the poles ; @xmath187 will be different for the different poles . with the above parameterizations for all the external particles momenta , the calculations for the linear expansion in @xmath181 are straightforward . the final result for the soft pole contributions to the non - derivative terms when @xmath64 is nearly parallel to @xmath89 have the following form : @xmath211 \nonumber\\ & \times & \frac{\alpha_s}{2\pi^2}\ , \left[-\frac{1}{2n_c}\right ] \int dx\ , \xi \ , t_f(x , x ) \left[\frac{2\xi^3 - 3\xi^2 - 1}{1-\xi}\right]\ , , \label{x - ssa - nd - sa}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath180 is given in eq . ( [ hqq ] ) . the separate factorization for initial and final state interactions diagrams in fig . [ f17 ] , which we used to describe the factorization of the derivative contributions , also applies to the non - derivative ones . for example , the contributions from diagrams ( @xmath172-@xmath177 ) of fig . [ f15 ] can be factorized into the sivers function shown in fig . [ f17 ] , multiplied by @xmath149 and the partonic scattering function , including both the derivative and non - derivative contributions . the same happens for the final state interaction diagrams ( @xmath173-@xmath212 ) and ( @xmath174-@xmath213 ) . there are also hard pole contributions when @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath89 . we have shown these diagrams in fig . [ f18 ] . as discussed above , the hard pole diagrams only contribute to the non - derivative terms . to calculate their contributions , we follow the above method as for the soft pole contributions . because the hard poles appear in the internal propagator , we have to take _ all _ possible gluon attachments into account . for example , diagrams @xmath172-@xmath214 of fig . [ f18 ] display all contributions with the same hard pole ( indicated by the short bars in the propagators ) , with three different attachments of the polarized gluon . another important feature for the hard pole contributions is that , after taking the pole , the polarized gluon will have nonzero longitudinal momentum fraction , i.e. , @xmath215 as we mentioned above . this is in fact the reason for referring to these poles as `` hard '' poles . for example , the hard poles in the diagrams @xmath172-@xmath214 have the momentum @xmath216 with @xmath217 , and their pole arises at the following value for @xmath218 : @xmath219 where the last equality comes from the fact that @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath89 and is dominated by its plus component as shown in eq . ( [ e66 ] ) . we have also neglected all higher power corrections in @xmath220 in the above derivations . from this result , we find the associated twist - three quark - gluon correlation function will take the form @xmath221 , that is , its two arguments are not at the same . this is different from the soft pole contributions where @xmath222 and @xmath223 are equal in the twist-3 quark - gluon correlation matrix element . is parallel to @xmath89 . this part can be factorized into a hard pole contribution to the sivers function in the polarized hadron @xmath224 . the little circle in the diagrams represents all possible gluon attachments , as required by gauge - invariance . for example , the first one in the left panel represents all three diagrams @xmath172-@xmath214 of fig . [ f18].__,width=453 ] -0.4 cm in our calculations , we further choose physical polarization for the radiated gluon , with the following polarization tensor : @xmath225 with this choice , we only have contributions from the three - gluon vertex diagrams @xmath176 , @xmath226 and @xmath227 and , apart from the color factor , each of them contributes a term @xmath228 . their color factors are straightforward to decompose : @xmath229 we then directly find that the contributions of these diagrams can be factorized into the hard pole contributions to the sivers function , multiplied by @xmath149 ( or @xmath150 and @xmath151 ) and the partonic hard - scattering function . we display this factorization graphically in fig . the total contribution is given by @xmath230 \nonumber\\ & \times & \frac{\alpha_s}{2\pi^2}\ , \left[-\left(\frac{1}{2n_c } + c_f\right)\right ] \int dx\ , \xi \ , t_f(x , x-\hat x_g ) \left[\frac{1+\xi}{1-\xi}\right ] \ , \label{x - ssa - nd - ha}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath231 and @xmath180 is given in eq . ( [ hqq ] ) . indeed , the above result reproduces the contribution to eq . ( [ e39 ] ) that arises from the hard pole part of the quark sivers function . in summary , by combining all the soft - pole and hard - pole contributions when the radiated gluon is nearly parallel to the polarized nucleon , we can reproduce the contribution from the perturbatively generated sivers function to the ssa in dijet - correlations in eq . ( [ e39 ] ) , derived from the tmd factorization formula in the regime @xmath169 . with these explicit calculations , we have demonstrated that at this perturbative order the contribution to the ssa when @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath89 can be factorized into the quark sivers function , multiplied by the initial / final state interaction color - factors ( @xmath149 , @xmath150 , and @xmath151 ) , and the partonic scattering amplitude squared . the calculation for the contributions when @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath113 follows the same procedure as above . as we have shown earlier , there is no contribution to the derivative terms when @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath113 , and so we only need to consider the non - derivative contributions . we will also have both soft and hard poles contributions . in fig . [ f20 ] , we have shown the soft pole diagrams , and in figs . [ f21],[f22 ] the hard pole ones . again we have to keep track of the @xmath181-flow in the scattering amplitudes . first , we need to parameterize the momenta of all the external particles including their linear dependence on @xmath181 . for example , when the polarized gluon attaches to the left of the cut line in the diagrams of figs . [ f20]-[f22 ] , the momentum @xmath189 of the radiated gluon and the quark momentum @xmath187 can be parameterized as @xmath232 and @xmath233 with @xmath202 determined by the pole . note that these parameterizations are different from those in eqs . ( [ e75]),([e76 ] ) . this is because , when @xmath64 is parallel to @xmath113 , its minus component is dominant and is parameterized by @xmath234 . again , this minus component does not depend linearly on @xmath181 . the plus component of @xmath189 does have linear dependence , which can be calculated from the on - shell condition @xmath198 . the linear @xmath181-dependence for the plus component of @xmath187 can be calculated as well . likewise , when the gluon attaches to the right of the cut , we will have @xmath235 and @xmath210 with @xmath202 determined from the position of the poles . again , different poles will give different results for @xmath202 , following the above discussions for the soft pole contributions . is parallel to @xmath113 . this contribution is factorized into the tmd quark distribution in the unpolarized nucleon @xmath236 . the little circle in the diagrams represents all possible gluon attachments . the bars indicate the poles . the second and third diagrams in the left panel represent the soft pole diagrams @xmath173-@xmath212 and @xmath174-@xmath213 of fig . [ f20 ] respectively . the first one contains both soft poles ( represented by the bar on the circle ( diagrams @xmath172-@xmath177 of fig . [ f20 ] ) ) and hard poles ( indicated by the bar on the straight line ( all diagrams in fig . [ f21])).__,width=453 ] -0.4 cm by using the above parameterizations for the momenta of the external particles , we can calculate the contributions from the soft pole diagrams in fig . [ f20 ] , and the hard pole diagrams in figs . [ f21 ] and [ f22 ] . we further find that the contribution from the hard pole diagrams in fig . [ f22 ] is power suppressed by @xmath15 . so , for the hard pole contributions , we only need to consider the diagrams shown in fig . [ f21 ] , which all have the same hard pole indicated by the bars on the propagators . as discussed in the last subsection , the hard pole contributions may in general lead to the polarized gluon having nonzero longitudinal momentum fraction , @xmath215 . however , when the radiated gluon s momentum @xmath64 is nearly parallel to @xmath113 , the hard poles lead to @xmath237 at leading power , as was the case for the soft pole contributions . this is very different from what we found for the hard pole contributions in the last subsection in the case @xmath64 parallel to @xmath89 . the momentum giving the hard pole , @xmath238 with @xmath217 , is the same as in the last subsection . however , taking the pole , we now find @xmath239 where the last equation holds in the limit @xmath240 . the reason for this is that , when @xmath64 becomes parallel to @xmath113 , it will be dominated by its minus component and can be parameterized as @xmath241 . substituting this into the above equation ( [ xdef ] ) , we find that the numerator is of order @xmath242 , whereas the denominator is of order @xmath118 . so , in the leading power approximation , @xmath243 for the hard pole contributions when @xmath64 is nearly parallel to @xmath113 . the contributions from the soft poles in fig . [ f20 ] and the hard poles in fig . [ f21 ] is added to obtain the final results . we emphasize again that our power - counting based analysis is only valid for the leading power terms in the @xmath15 expansion . the final result for the contributions from figs . [ f20 ] and [ f21 ] , plus their mirror diagrams , is @xmath244 \nonumber\\ & \times & \frac{\alpha_s}{2\pi^2}\ , c_f \ , \int dx'\ , \xi ' \ , q'(x ' ) \left[\frac{1+\xi^{\prime 2}}{1-\xi'}\right ] \ , \label{x - ssa - nd - b}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which is again proportional to the same hard factor @xmath245 , and reproduces the last term in the tmd factorization formula eq . ( [ e39 ] ) . it is important to note that a part of the hard pole contributions from fig . [ f21 ] cancels out the soft pole contributions from diagrams @xmath172-@xmath177 of fig . the remainder of the hard pole contribution is factorized into the quark distribution multiplied by @xmath149 and the partonic scattering function . the soft pole diagrams @xmath173-@xmath212 and @xmath174-@xmath213 are separately factorized into the same quark distribution for the unpolarized nucleon multiplied by @xmath150 and @xmath151 , respectively , and the partonic scattering function . we illustrate this factorization in fig . [ f23 ] . after summing up all contributions from eqs . ( [ x - ssa - d ] ) , ( [ x - ssa - nd - sa ] ) , ( [ x - ssa - nd - ha ] ) , and ( [ x - ssa - nd - b ] ) , we obtain the total leading - power contribution to @xmath13 from the @xmath246 partonic subprocess in the @xmath15 expansion . it reproduces the factorized formula in eq . ( [ e39 ] ) , which is the leading term in the corresponding tmd factorization formula , eq . ( [ e4 ] ) . in summary , we have calculated the single transverse - spin asymmetry in dijet - correlation in the twist - three approach when the radiated gluon is parallel to either the polarized nucleon or the unpolarized nucleon . by using the power counting technique , we have shown that the contribution to the ssa can be factorized into the perturbatively generated quark sivers function when the radiated gluon is parallel to the polarized nucleon , and into the unpolarized quark distribution when it is parallel to the unpolarized nucleon . we have demonstrated that the result reproduces the leading order terms in the corresponding tmd factorization formalism in the regime @xmath247 . this is a nontrivial result , especially for the single spin asymmetry , because the calculations for the quark sivers function at this order have to take into account the perturbative expansion of the gauge link at next - to - leading order ( @xmath248 ) . the single spin dependent differential cross section term in eq . ( [ e4 ] ) can be further simplified by taking a moment in @xmath9 . such a moment was also considered in @xcite . we can rewrite @xmath249 where @xmath250 is the so - called bi - sector angle of the two jets : @xmath251 with @xmath252 and @xmath253 the azimuthal angles of the two jets relative to the polarization vector @xmath34 . the angle @xmath254 measures how far the two jets are away from the back - to - back configuration . all these azimuthal angles are defined in a frame in which the polarized proton is moving in the @xmath255 direction . since @xmath256 , the @xmath9-moment of the asymmetry is also related to the @xmath257-moment . one interesting moment is the following : @xmath258 where @xmath259 is the twist-3 matrix element of the quark - gluon correlation function defined in eq . ( [ tf ] ) @xcite . it is also related to the @xmath260-moment of the tmd quark sivers function , see eq . ( [ e34 ] ) . an advantage of taking this moment of the asymmetry is that the transverse momentum integrals of the various factors in the factorization formula decouple from each other , without further assumptions for the @xmath260-dependence of the tmd distributions . in fact , the ssa in the @xmath9 moment of the dijet momentum imbalance is effectively a physical quantity with only a _ single _ large observed scale , @xmath8 . for such an observable , the conventional collinear factorization is more appropriate . in this case , all partons transverse momentum dependence is integrated into the usual collinear parton distributions . the hard factors we obtained above for all the partonic channels agree with those given in @xcite , although a very different approach was adopted there . in @xcite , in order to investigate the @xmath9-moment of the single spin asymmetry , the appropriate gauge links were derived and expanded to first order in @xmath261 . since both approaches have included the initial / final state interactions in their formalisms , they should agree with each other at this order . in this paper , we have studied the asymmetric production of two jets in hadronic collisions . using the collinear factorization approach in perturbative qcd , we calculated both the spin - averaged and the spin - dependent differential cross section for the hadronic production of dijets with momentum imbalance @xmath9 , in a kinematic region where @xmath262 . at the first nonvanishing order , the momentum imbalance is generated by radiating a gluon with transverse momentum equal to the imbalance . in the limit when the imbalance @xmath9 is much less than the averaged jet momentum @xmath8 , we derived the leading - power contribution to the cross sections in the @xmath15 expansion when the radiated gluon is nearly parallel to one of the incoming hadrons . we found that the perturbatively calculated leading contributions to both the spin - averaged and the spin - dependent cross sections can be factorized into a partonic hard part which is a function of @xmath8 , and into perturbatively generated tmd parton distributions at @xmath248 . our results derived in the collinear factorization approach in the limit @xmath263 reproduce the same factorized expressions in eqs . ( [ e37]),([e39 ] ) that were derived as the leading order terms of the generalized tmd factorization formulas in eqs . ( [ e4]),([e2 ] ) when the observed @xmath9 is solely due to the perturbatively generated tmd parton distribution of one of the incoming hadrons . the consistency between the results derived in the collinear factorization approach and those derived by expanding the generalized tmd factorization formulas in eqs . ( [ e4]),([e2 ] ) to the same order naturally leads us to ask if the generalized tmd factorization formulas in eqs . ( [ e4]),([e2 ] ) are actually valid for the hadronic dijet production to all orders in perturbative qcd when @xmath264 , like the tmd factorization formulas for drell - yan and sidis . _ if this were true _ , the consistency that we demonstrated in this paper in the overlap region where @xmath50 would effectively provide a unified picture and treatment for the hadronic dijet production over the full kinematic range of jet momenta : using the tmd factorization formalism when the dijet momentum imbalance is small and the collinear factorization approach when it is large . this is exactly what was achieved in ref . @xcite for the drell - yan and sidis processes . however , as we mentioned at the beginning of sec . iii , showing the consistency between two factorized formalisms at the leading order when @xmath265 is not sufficient to prove the tmd factorization formula over its full kinematic region . when we started with the collinear factorization approach to calculate the momentum imbalance of the dijet cross section , we already took as a fact that the long - distance interaction between the hadrons / jets at their mass scales , @xmath266 , are factorized for the given @xmath267 . that is , our results derived in the limit @xmath265 are valid when @xmath268 ; but , our derivation does not address the issues concerning the factorization of the interactions between the hadrons / jets when @xmath269 or the mass scale of the hadrons / jets involved . the consistency that we demonstrated here is certainly a necessary condition that needs to be satisfied should the tmd factorization formulas be valid . for the tmd factorization to be true , we need to establish two key facts : the partonic hard part at @xmath54 must be insensitive to any physics at the scale @xmath78 , and the tmd parton distributions at the scale @xmath9 should be process independent and universal , or at least , `` quasi''-universal up to a sign change @xcite . in this paper , we also calculated in sec . ii the partonic hard parts at @xmath57 by using the brodsky - hwang - schmidt model with the proper color factor for the interaction vertices . we derived the partonic hard parts from the lowest order scattering diagrams and showed that the dynamics of partonic scattering at scale @xmath57 is independent of the model of nucleon that we used in our derivation . since the ssa can be generated by either initial- or final - state interactions , the color flow of the partonic scattering in the dijet momentum imbalance is very different from that of drell - yan and sidis . since all poles from the initial- and final - state one gluon interactions contribute to the ssa , and the color factor for each individual scattering diagram is insensitive to the long - distance details of the nucleon because there is only one unique color structure for the active quark - gluon combination at this order , we were able to factor the process - dependent as well as the diagram - specific color factors along with the partonic hard parts , and leave the physics at scale @xmath270 in the tmd parton distributions defined in sidis . by doing that , we found that the resulting full partonic hard parts are the same as those derived in the collinear factorization approach . however , for a full tmd factorization , we will have to show that the poles from multiple gluon interactions can be exponentiated into the gauge link that defines the tmd parton distributions , while leaving the same partonic hard parts with the same color factors . due to the mixture of initial- and final - state interactions and the complications of color flows , this task is very non - trivial and is beyond the scope of this paper . to better understand the dijet momentum imbalance in hadronic collisions , a number of extensions can be performed based on our results . first , in this paper , we have only studied the contribution of one gluon radiation collinear to one of the incident hadrons . this should be extended to other kinematic regions of the gluon . for example , when the gluon is radiated parallel to the final state jets or hadrons , it is important to see how the corresponding contribution can be accommodated by the jet definition , or be factorized into the fragmentation functions for the hadron , especially in the spin - dependent case . another important kinematic regime is when the radiated gluon becomes soft . it is very important to see if the resulting contribution can be factorized into a soft factor , as predicted by the tmd factorization formalism . in addition , in this paper we have only discussed the ssa for dijet correlations , which has sivers - type contributions . for the related di - hadron correlations , one expects also the collins mechanism to be important , and it will be interesting to explore it and the factorization properties of the corresponding spin - dependent cross section . the method and procedure used in this paper should provide useful guidance in all these related studies . we finally note that if the tmd factorization indeed fails , a careful comparison between our results and experimental data as the momentum imbalance @xmath15 decreases could furnish an ideal test of the breaking of factorization and provide new opportunities to explore qcd dynamics . we are grateful to cedran bomhof , john collins , andreas metz , and piet mulders for useful discussions . we thank xiangdong ji for his general remarks and his reminding us the wigner - eckart theorem for the color - factor decomposition . we especially thank george sterman for continued discussions on the factorization issues in hadronic reactions . is supported in part by the u. s. department of energy under grant no . de - fg02 - 87er-40371 . w.v . are finally grateful to riken , brookhaven national laboratory and the u.s . department of energy ( contract number de - ac02 - 98ch10886 ) for providing the facilities essential for the completion of their work . thanks the high energy theory group at argonne national laboratory for its hospitality during the writing of this work . in this appendix , we list the hard factors for the dijet - correlation at hadron colliders , for the unpolarized and the single - transverse spin dependent cases . for unpolarized scattering , the hard factors are well - known in the literature . they may also be obtained from the results shown in tables i - iii , using eq . ( [ e29 ] ) . for completeness , we list them here : @xmath271-\frac{n_c^2 - 1}{4n_c^3}\frac{4\hat s^2}{\hat t\hat u}\right\ } \ , \nonumber\\ h_{q\bar q\to q\bar q}^{uu}(\hat s,\hat t,\hat u)&=&\frac{\alpha_s^2\pi}{\hat s^2}\left\{\frac{n_c^2 - 1}{4n_c^2}\left[\frac{2(\hat s^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat t^2}+\frac{2(\hat u^2+\hat t^2)}{\hat s^2}\right]-\frac{n_c^2 - 1}{4n_c^3}\frac{4\hat u^2}{\hat s\hat t}\right\ } \ , \nonumber\\ h_{qg\to qg}^{uu}(\hat s,\hat t,\hat u)&=&\frac{\alpha_s^2\pi}{\hat s^2}\left\{\frac{1}{2}\frac{2(\hat s^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat t^2}-\frac{c_f}{2n_c}\frac{2(\hat s^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat s\hat t}\right\ } \ , \nonumber\\ h_{q\bar q\to gg}^{uu}(\hat s,\hat t,\hat u)&=&\frac{\alpha_s^2\pi}{\hat s^2}\left\{\frac{c_f^2}{n_c}\frac{2(\hat t^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat t\hat u}-c_f\frac{2(\hat t^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat s^2}\right\ } \ , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath272 for the single - transverse spin dependent case , using eq.([e30 ] ) , we obtain @xmath273+\frac{n_c^2 + 3}{4n_c^3}\frac{4\hat s^2}{\hat t\hat u}\right\ } \ , \nonumber\\ h_{q\bar q\to q\bar q}^{\rm sivers}(\hat s,\hat t,\hat u)&=&\frac{\alpha_s^2\pi}{\hat s^2}\left\{-\frac{n_c^2 - 3}{4n_c^2}\frac{2(\hat s^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat t^2}+\frac{n_c^2 + 1}{4n_c^2}\frac{2(\hat u^2+\hat t^2)}{\hat s^2}-\frac{n_c^2 + 1}{4n_c^3}\frac{4\hat u^2}{\hat s\hat t}\right\ } \ , \nonumber\\ h_{qg\to qg}^{\rm sivers}(\hat s,\hat t,\hat u)&=&\frac{\alpha_s^2\pi}{\hat s^2}\left\{-\frac{n_c^2}{4(n_c^2 - 1)}\frac{2(\hat s^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat t^2}\left[\frac{\hat s}{\hat u}-\frac{\hat u}{\hat s}\right]-\frac{1}{2(n_c^2 - 1)}\frac{2(\hat s^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat t^2}\right.\nonumber\\ & & ~~~~~~~\left.-\frac{1}{4n_c^2(n_c^2 - 1)}\frac{2(\hat s^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat s\hat u}\right\ } \ , \nonumber\\ h_{q\bar q\to gg}^{\rm sivers}(\hat s,\hat t,\hat u)&=&\frac{\alpha_s^2\pi}{\hat s^2}\left\{-\frac{1}{2n_c}\frac{2(\hat t^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat s^2}+\frac{n_c}{4}\frac{2(\hat t^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat s^2}\left[\frac{\hat t}{\hat u}+\frac{\hat u}{\hat t}\right]\right.\nonumber\\ & & ~~~~~~~\left.-\frac{2n_c^2 + 1}{4n_c^3}\frac{2(\hat t^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat t\hat u}\right\ } \ , \nonumber\\ h_{qg\to q\gamma}^{\rm sivers}(\hat s,\hat t,\hat u)&=&\frac{\alpha_s\alpha_e e_q^2\pi}{\hat s^2}\left(-\frac{n_c^2 + 1}{2n_c(n_c^2 - 1)}\right)\frac{2(\hat s^2+\hat u^2)}{-\hat s\hat u } \ , \nonumber\\ h_{q\bar q\to g\gamma}^{\rm sivers}(\hat s,\hat t,\hat u)&=&\frac{\alpha_s\alpha_e e_q^2\pi}{\hat s^2}\left(\frac{n_c^2 + 1}{2n_c^2}\right)\frac{2(\hat t^2+\hat u^2)}{\hat t\hat u } \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the above results are for @xmath98-channel scattering . in dijet - production , both @xmath98 and @xmath99 channel processes will contribute . the hard factors for the @xmath99-channel scattering can be obtained from the results above by exchanging @xmath274 . g. bunce _ et al . _ , lett . * 36 * , 1113 ( 1976 ) . a. airapetian _ et al . _ [ hermes collaboration ] , phys . lett . * 84 * , 4047 ( 2000 ) ; phys . lett . * 94 * , 012002 ( 2005 ) . a. bravar [ spin muon collaboration ] , nucl . a * 666 * , 314 ( 2000 ) ; h. avakian [ clas collaboration ] , talk presented at the rbrc workshop `` single - spin asymmetries '' , brookhaven national laboratory , upton , new york , june 1 - 3 , 2005 , rbrc proceedings volume 75 ( bnl-74717 - 2005 ) ; v. y. alexakhin _ et al . _ [ compass collaboration ] , phys . lett . * 94 * , 202002 ( 2005 ) ; e. s. ageev _ et al . _ [ compass collaboration ] , arxiv : hep - ex/0610068 ; f. bradamante [ compass collaboration ] , talk presented at the `` 17th international spin physics symposium ( spin 2006 ) '' , kyoto , japan , october 2 - 7 , 2006 . j. adams _ et al . _ [ star collaboration ] , phys . rev . lett . * 92 * , 171801 ( 2004 ) ; l. nogach , talk presented at the `` 17th international spin physics symposium ( spin 2006 ) '' , kyoto , japan , october 2 - 7 , 2006 , arxiv : hep - ex/0612030 . s. s. adler [ phenix collaboration ] , phys . * 95 * , 202001 ( 2005 ) ; m. chiu , talk presented at the `` 17th international spin physics symposium ( spin 2006 ) '' , kyoto , japan , october 2 - 7 , 2006 ; c. a. aidala , ph.d . thesis , columbia u. , arxiv : hep - ex/0601009 . f. videbaek [ brahms collaboration ] , aip conf . * 792 * , 993 ( 2005 ) ; j. h. lee [ brahms collaboration ] , talk presented at the `` 17th international spin physics symposium ( spin 2006 ) '' , kyoto , japan , october 2 - 7 , 2006 . g. l. kane , j. pumplin and w. repko , phys . lett . * 41 * , 1689 ( 1978 ) . for reviews , see : m. anselmino , a. efremov and e. leader , phys . * 261 * , 1 ( 1995 ) [ erratum - ibid . * 281 * , 399 ( 1997 ) ] ; z. t. liang and c. boros , int . j. mod . a * 15 * , 927 ( 2000 ) ; v. barone , a. drago and p. g. ratcliffe , phys . * 359 * , 1 ( 2002 ) . s. j. brodsky , d. s. hwang and i. schmidt , phys . b * 530 * , 99 ( 2002 ) ; nucl . b * 642 * , 344 ( 2002 ) . j. c. collins , phys . b * 536 * , 43 ( 2002 ) . d. w. sivers , phys . d * 41 * , 83 ( 1990 ) ; phys . d * 43 * , 261 ( 1991 ) . x. ji and f. yuan , phys . b * 543 * , 66 ( 2002 ) ; a. v. belitsky , x. ji and f. yuan , nucl . phys . b * 656 * , 165 ( 2003 ) . d. boer , p. j. mulders and f. pijlman , nucl . phys . b * 667 * , 201 ( 2003 ) . j. c. collins and d. e. soper , nucl . b * 193 * , 381 ( 1981 ) [ erratum - ibid . b * 213 * , 545 ( 1983 ) ] ; nucl . b * 197 * , 446 ( 1982 ) . j. c. collins , d. e. soper and g. sterman , nucl . b * 250 * , 199 ( 1985 ) . d. boer and w. vogelsang , phys . rev . d * 69 * , 094025 ( 2004 ) . b. i. abelev , _ et al . _ , [ star collaboration ] arxiv:0705.4629 [ hep - ex ] ; j. balewski , talk presented at the spin 2006 symposium , kyoto , japan , october 2 - 7 , 2006 , arxiv : hep - ex/0612036 . c. j. bomhof , p. j. mulders and f. pijlman , phys . b * 596 * , 277 ( 2004 ) ; eur . j. c * 47 * , 147 ( 2006 ) ; a. bacchetta , c. j. bomhof , p. j. mulders and f. pijlman , phys . d * 72 * , 034030 ( 2005 ) ; c. j. bomhof and p. j. mulders , jhep * 0702 * , 029 ( 2007 ) . j. w. qiu , w. vogelsang and f. yuan , arxiv:0704.1153 [ hep - ph ] , phys . b in press . a. v. efremov and o. v. teryaev , sov . j. nucl . * 36 * , 140 ( 1982 ) [ yad . 36 * , 242 ( 1982 ) ] ; a. v. efremov and o. v. teryaev , phys . b * 150 * , 383 ( 1985 ) . j. qiu and g. sterman , phys . lett . * 67 * , 2264 ( 1991 ) ; nucl . b * 378 * , 52 ( 1992 ) ; phys . d * 59 * , 014004 ( 1999 ) . j. botts and g. sterman , nucl . b * 325 * , 62 ( 1989 ) . n. kidonakis and g. sterman , nucl . b * 505 * , 321 ( 1997 ) ; nucl . b * 525 * , 299 ( 1998 ) ; n. kidonakis , g. oderda and g. sterman , nucl . b * 531 * , 365 ( 1998 ) . x. ji , j. w. qiu , w. vogelsang and f. yuan , phys . rev . lett . * 97 * , 082002 ( 2006 ) ; phys . d * 73 * , 094017 ( 2006 ) ; phys . b * 638 * , 178 ( 2006 ) . w. vogelsang and f. yuan , phys . d * 72 * , 054028 ( 2005 ) . j. collins and j. w. qiu , arxiv:0705.2141 [ hep - ph ] . g. altarelli and g. parisi , nucl . b * 126 * , 298 ( 1977 ) . g. t. bodwin , phys . d * 31 * , 2616 ( 1985 ) [ erratum - ibid . d * 34 * , 3932 ( 1986 ) ] . x. ji , phys . b * 289 * , 137 ( 1992 ) . a. bacchetta , c. bomhof , u. dalesio , p. j. mulders and f. murgia , arxiv : hep - ph/0703153 . c. j. bomhof , p. j. mulders , w. vogelsang and f. yuan , phys . rev . d * 75 * , 074019 ( 2007 ) . j. w. qiu and g. sterman , aip conf . proc . * 223 * , 249 ( 1991 ) ; nucl . b * 353 * , 137 ( 1991 ) . c. kouvaris , j. w. qiu , w. vogelsang and f. yuan , phys . d * 74 * , 114013 ( 2006 ) . h. eguchi , y. koike and k. tanaka , nucl . b * 752 * , 1 ( 2006 ) ; nucl . b * 763 * , 198 ( 2007 ) ; y. koike and k. tanaka , phys . b * 646 * , 232 ( 2007 ) ; arxiv : hep - ph/0703169 . g. ratcliffe and o. v. teryaev , arxiv : hep - ph/0703293 . Abstract:
[ "we study the single transverse - spin asymmetry for dijet production in hadronic collisions in both the collinear qcd factorization approach and the brodsky - hwang - schmidt model . we show that a nonvanishing asymmetry is generated by both initial - state and final - state interactions , and that the final - state interactions dominate . we find that in the leading kinematic region where the transverse momentum imbalance of the two jets , @xmath0 , is much less than the momentum of either jet , the contribution from the lowest non - trivial perturbative order to both the spin - averaged and the spin - dependent dijet cross sections can be factorized into a hard part that is a function only of the averaged jet momentum @xmath1 , and perturbatively generated transverse momentum dependent ( tmd ) parton distributions . we show that the spin asymmetry at this non - trivial perturbative order can be described by the tmd parton distributions defined in either semi - inclusive dis or the drell - yan process . we derive the same hard parts from both the collinear factorization approach and in the context of the brodsky - hwang - schmidt model , verifying that they are not sensitive to details of the factorized long distance physics ." ]
13,422
13,422
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: it has been pointed out in previous publications @xcite that various models in quantum field theory ( qft ) , including qed , can be reformulated , using mediating - field green functions , in such a way that exact few - particle eigenstates of the resulting partially truncated hamiltonian can be obtained . this approach was then applied to two - body eigenstates in the scalar yukawa ( wick - cutkosky ) theory @xcite . we implement such an approach to qed in this paper . the lagrangian of two fermion fields , @xmath0 and @xmath1 , interacting electromagnetically , is @xmath2 the corresponding euler - lagrange equations of motion are the coupled dirac - maxwell equations , @xmath3 @xmath4 and @xmath5 where @xmath6 the equations ( [ 1.2 ] ) - ( [ 1.4 ] ) can be decoupled in part by using the well - known @xcite formal solution of the maxwell equation ( [ 1.4 ] ) , namely @xmath7 where @xmath8 is a green function ( or photon propagator in qft terminology ) , defined by @xmath9 and @xmath10 is a solution of the homogeneous ( or `` free field '' ) equation ( [ 1.4 ] ) with @xmath11 . we recall , in passing , that equation ( [ 1.7 ] ) does not define the covariant green function @xmath8 uniquely . for one thing , one can always add a solution of the homogeneous equation ( _ eq . _ ( [ 1.7 ] ) with @xmath12 . this allows for a certain freedom in the choice of @xmath13 , as is discussed in standard texts ( e.g. refs . @xcite ) . in practice , the solution of eq . ( [ 1.7 ] ) , like that of eq . ( [ 1.4 ] ) , requires a choice of gauge . however , we do not need to specify one at this stage . substitution of the formal solution ( [ 1.6 ] ) into equations ( [ 1.2 ] ) and ( [ 1.3 ] ) yields the partially reduced " equations , @xmath14 and @xmath15 these are nonlinear coupled dirac equations for two different fermion fields . to our knowledge no exact ( analytic or numeric ) solutions of equations ( [ 1.8 ] ) and ( [ 1.9 ] ) for classical fields have been reported in the literature , even for the case of a single fermion field ( say @xmath16 ) , though approximate ( perturbative ) solutions have been discussed by various authors , particularly barut and his co - workers ( see refs . @xcite and citations therein ) . however , our interest here is in the quantized field theory . the partially reduced equations ( [ 1.8])-([1.9 ] ) are derivable from the stationary action principle @xmath17 = \delta \int { \cal l}_{r}\ ; d^4x = 0,\ ] ] with the lagrangian density @xmath18 provided that the green function is symmetric in the sense that @xmath19 one can proceed to do conventional covariant perturbation theory using the reformulated qed lagrangian ( [ 1.11 ] ) . the interaction part of ( [ 1.11 ] ) has a somewhat modified structure from that of the usual formulation of qed . thus , there are two interaction terms . the last term of ( [ 1.11 ] ) is a `` current - current '' interaction which contains the photon propagator sandwiched between the fermionic currents . as such , it corresponds to feynman diagrams without external photon lines . the terms containing @xmath20 corresponds to diagrams that can not be generated by the term containing @xmath21 , particularly diagrams involving external photon lines ( care would have to be taken not to double count physical effects ) . however , we shall not pursue perturbation theory in this work . rather , we shall consider an approach that allows one to write down some unorthodox but exact eigenstates of a truncated model , in which terms involving @xmath22 are ignored . the paper is organized as follows . in section 2 we quantize the system using the canonical equal time formalism in the schrdinger picture . in section 3 an unconventional empty " vacuum state is used to construct exact one- , two- , and three - fermion eigenstates of the hamiltonian , truncated to exclude states with free ( physical ) photons . in section 4 we show that the resulting two - fermion equation is the breit equation in the coulomb gauge , but that it is the eddington - gaunt equation in the lorentz gauge . in section 5 we demonstrate that the breit equation can be obtained in the lorentz gauge , provided that higher - order retardation effects are taken into account . the reduction of the breit equation to radial form is described briefly in section 6 . for states of zero total angular momentum ( @xmath23 ) , four coupled radial equations are shown to arise . the analytical structure of their solutions is studied in section 7 . perturbative @xmath24 corrections to the rydberg spectrum of @xmath23 states are obtained in section 8 . in the case of equal rest masses the @xmath25 state equations have no unusual singularities and can be solved numerically . some of these results are presented and discussed in section 9 . the remainder of the paper is devoted to the study of @xmath26 states . in the section 10 the set of eight coupled radial first - order differential equations is reduced to four first - order ones and then to two second - order schrdinger - like equations . they are solved perturbatively in section 11 and @xmath24 relativistic corrections to the non - relativistic mass spectrum are obtained . a summary and concluding remarks are given in section 12 . we consider this theory in the canonical , equal - time formalism . to this end we write down the hamiltonian density corresponding to the lagrangian ( [ 1.11 ] ) @xmath27 where we have not written out the hamiltonian density for the free @xmath28 field . equal - time quantization corresponds to the imposition of anticommutation rules for the fermion fields , namely @xmath29 and all others vanish . in addition , if @xmath30 , there are the usual commutation rules for the @xmath20 field , and commutation of the @xmath20 field operators with the @xmath31 and @xmath32 field operators . the hamiltonian ( [ 2.1 ] ) contains an interaction term that is nonlocal in time , which can complicate the transition to a quantized theory . we shall avoid this problem by working in the schrdinger picture with @xmath33 in the expressions for the field operators and currents , that is @xmath34 , @xmath35 , etc . in equation ( [ 2.1 ] ) . this corresponds to neglecting higher order retardation effects . thereupon we obtain the result @xmath36 where @xmath37 for example , in the lorentz gauge ( @xmath38 ) , we have @xmath39 thus , in the schrdinger picture , the third term of the hamiltonian density ( [ 2.1 ] ) takes on the form @xmath40 in the remainder of this paper , we shall consider the simplified model without the interaction terms in ( [ 2.1 ] ) that contains @xmath41 . such a model is suitable for describing few - fermion states interacting via virtual photon exchange , but without decay or annihilation involving free ( physical ) photons . in short , in all that follows we consider the field theory based on the hamiltonian density of ( [ 2.1 ] ) but with @xmath42 . an attractive feature of this model is that exact few - fermion eigenstates of the hamiltonian can be obtained . we consider now the model for which the hamiltonian , in the schrdinger picture with @xmath33 , is given by the expression @xmath43 where @xmath44 @xmath45 and @xmath46 , where @xmath47 is given in equation ( [ 2.6 ] ) . note , again , that the terms in @xmath48 have been suppressed , so that processes in which free ( physical ) photons are emitted or absorbed are not accommodated . the hamiltonian @xmath49 has the same structure as the coulomb - qed ( cqed ) hamiltonian , that is the hamiltonian of qed in the coulomb gauge , but with the `` transverse - photon '' part ( that contains @xmath50 ) turned off . indeed @xmath49 would beidentical to @xmath51 if the indeces @xmath52 and @xmath53 took on only the value @xmath54 in equation ( [ 2.6 ] ) ( as it is , @xmath55 in eq.([2.6 ] ) ) . it has been shown earlier @xcite that exact two - fermion eigenstates of @xmath51 can be written down if we use an unconventional ( or `` empty '' ) vacuum state , @xmath56 , defined by @xmath57 the same is true of the present more realistic model , as we point out below . the unconventional empty vacuum definition ( [ 3.4 ] ) means that @xmath58 is interpreted as a ( free ) dirac - particle annihilation operator , while @xmath59 is , correspondingly , a dirac - particle creation operator . by `` dirac - particle '' we mean one described by the full dirac spinor , including positive and negative frequency components . ( recall that in the conventional approach , _ i.e. _ using a dirac `` filled negative energy sea '' vacuum which is annihilated by the positive frequency component of @xmath31 , it is only the negative - frequency component of @xmath31 that is an antiparticle creation operator , and the positive - frequency component of @xmath60 that is the particle creation operator ) . with these conventions , we write the normal - ordered hamiltonian @xmath61,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath62 and @xmath63 , etc . the normal ordering is achieved by using the anticommutation rules ( [ 2.2 ] ) as usual ; but note that it is not identical to the conventional normal ordering because of the unconventional empty vacuum that is being used , and the unconventional definition of @xmath31 and @xmath32 as annihilation operators and of @xmath64 as creation operators . to underscore this unconventional procedure we use the notation @xmath65 rather than @xmath66 in equation ( [ 3.5 ] ) . we note that the state defined by @xmath67 is a @xmath68 c - number coefficient vector , is an eigenstate of @xmath65 ( eq . ( [ 3.5 ] ) ) provided that @xmath69 satisfies the equation @xmath70 which is the usual time - independent one - particle dirac equation ( with positive and negative energy solutions ) , so that @xmath69 is a dirac spinor . therefore , we refer to @xmath71 as a one - dirac - fermion state . similarly , the two - dirac - fermion state , @xmath72 ( summation on @xmath73 implied ) is an eigenstate of @xmath65 ( equation ( [ 3.5 ] ) ) provided that the @xmath74 eigenmatrix @xmath75 satisfies the equation @xmath76^t + q_1 q_2 g_{\mu \nu}({\bx } - { { \mbox{\boldmath$y$ } } } ) { \tilde \gamma}^\mu f({\bx},{{\mbox{\boldmath$y$ } } } ) ( { \tilde \gamma}^\nu)^t = e\ , f({\bx},{{\mbox{\boldmath$y$}}}),\ ] ] where @xmath77 , @xmath78 , and the superscript @xmath79 indicates the transpose of the matrix in question . the detailed form of the interaction matrix @xmath80 depends on the choice of gauge . this equation ( [ 3.9 ] ) is a two - fermion dirac - like , or breit - like , equation with positive and negative energy solutions , and is , in this respect , different from those obtained in the conventional approach @xcite-@xcite in which the negative - energy solutions do not arise . we note , in passing , that if the interaction is turned off in eq . ( [ 3.9 ] ) ( _ i.e. _ @xmath81 ) , then the solution can be written as @xmath82 where @xmath83 and @xmath84 are solutions of the one - body dirac eigenvalue equation ( [ 3.7 ] ) . this indicates that in @xmath85 $ ] , the index @xmath86 corresponds to particle 1 ( with coordinates @xmath87 ) while @xmath88 corresponds to particle 2 ( with coordinates @xmath89 ) . in the rest frame of the two - fermion system ( _ i.e. _ when @xmath90 is taken to be an eigenstate of the momentum operator for this qft , with eigenvalue 0 ) , equation ( [ 3.9 ] ) reduces to an analogous equation in the single relative co - ordinate @xmath91 : @xmath92^t + q_1 q_2 g_{\mu \nu}({\br } ) { \tilde \gamma}^\mu f({\br } ) ( { \tilde \gamma}^\nu)^t = e \ , f({\br}).\ ] ] it can , therefore , be reduced to a set of ordinary , coupled , first - order differential equations for states of given @xmath93 . such equations can , at the very least , be solved numerically . this is a straightforward , though somewhat tedious , problem @xcite which we address below . the structure of the hamiltonian @xmath65 ( eq . ( [ 3.5 ] ) ) is such that generalizations to systems of more than two fermions are readily obtained . thus , the three fermion state , corresponding to a system like @xmath94 , defined by @xmath95 is an exact eigenstate of @xmath65 with eigenvalue @xmath96 , provided that the @xmath97 coefficient functions @xmath98 satisfy the three - body dirac - like equation , @xmath99_{\alpha_1 \alpha}\ ; f_{\alpha \alpha_2 \alpha_3}({\bx}_1,{\bx}_2,{\bx}_3 ) + \left[h_{m_1}({\bx}_2)\right]_{\alpha_2 \alpha}\;f_{\alpha_1 \alpha \alpha_3}({\bx}_1,{\bx}_2,{\bx}_3 ) \nn \\ { } + \left[h_{m_2}({\bx}_3 ) \right]_{\alpha_3 \alpha}\ ; f_{\alpha_1 \alpha_2 \alpha}({\bx}_1,{\bx}_2,{\bx}_3 ) + q_1 q_2 g_{\mu \nu } ( { \bx}_3 - { \bx}_1)\ ; ( { \tilde \gamma}^\mu)_{\alpha_1 \alpha}\;({\tilde \gamma}^\nu)_{\alpha_3 \beta}\ ; f_{\alpha \alpha_2 \beta}({\bx}_1,{\bx}_2,{\bx}_3 ) \nn \\ \label{3.12 } { } + q_1 q_2 g_{\mu \nu } ( { \bx}_3 - { \bx}_2 ) \ ; ( { \tilde \gamma}^\mu)_{\alpha_2 \alpha } \ ; ( { \tilde \gamma}^\nu)_{\alpha_3 \beta } \ ; f_{\alpha_1 \alpha \beta}({\bx}_1,{\bx}_2,{\bx}_3 ) \\ { } + q_1 ^ 2 g_{\mu \nu } ( { \bx}_1 - { \bx}_2 ) \ ; ( { \tilde \gamma}^\mu)_{\alpha_1 \alpha } \ ; ( { \tilde \gamma}^\nu)_{\alpha_2 \beta } \ ; f_{\alpha \beta \alpha_3 } ( { \bx}_1,{\bx}_2,{\bx}_3 ) \nn \\ { } = e \ ; f_{\alpha_1 \alpha_2 \alpha_3}({\bx}_1,{\bx}_2,{\bx}_3 ) , \nn\end{aligned}\ ] ] where summation on repeated spinor indices is implied . in the rest frame of the three - body system equation ( [ 3.12 ] ) reduces to one in two independent vectors only . nevertheless , the reduction of the equation for states of given @xmath93 is more formidable than in the two - body case . even then one is left with the full complexity of a relativistic three - body system . we shall not consider solutions of the three - body equation ( [ 3.12 ] ) in this paper . at this stage we must specify the choice of green s function , that is a choice of gauge . we could use any gauge , in principle , but we shall use the coulomb gauge , as this avoids nonphysical degrees of freedom and the need to take account of auxiliary conditions ( such as @xmath100 in the lorentz gauge ) . we use the relation @xmath101 and note that @xmath102 in the coulomb gauge @xcite . therefore , if we use eq . ( [ 2.3 ] ) and the identity ( @xcite , eq . 39.8 ) @xmath103 we obtain the coordinate - space representation of the coulomb - gauge green function @xmath104 where @xmath105 and @xmath106 . consequently , in the coulomb gauge , equation ( [ 3.10 ] ) becomes @xmath107^t + v(r ) \left [ f(\br ) - { 1 \over 2 } \left ( \arrowal f(\br ) \ , \cdot \arrowal^t + { 1 \over r^2 } \br \ , \cdot \arrowal f(\br ) \ , \br \ , \cdot \arrowal^t \right ) \right ] = e\ , f(\br ) , \ ] ] where @xmath108 . keeping in mind the notation , as explained below eq . ( [ 3.9a ] ) , we see that equation ( [ 4.5 ] ) is nothing other than the breit equation @xcite , written in the rest frame of the two - fermion system . if we had used the lorentz - gauge form of the green function ( [ 2.5 ] ) , equation ( [ 3.10 ] ) would take on the form @xmath109^t + v(r ) \left [ f(\br ) - \arrowal f(\br ) \ , \cdot \arrowal^t \right ] = e\ , f(\br ) , \ ] ] which is recognized to be the eddington - gaunt equation @xcite . the gaunt equation , unlike the breit equation , does not contain even lowest - order retardation effects ( see , also , section 5 , following ) . therefore , it will yield energy eigenvalues that will differ from those of the breit equation already at @xmath24 . note , also , that equations ( [ 4.5 ] ) and ( [ 4.6 ] ) , with the terms involving @xmath110 left out , become identical to the coulomb - qed model discussed earlier @xcite . although we shall use the coulomb gauge in this paper , it is instructive to see how , in the lorentz gauge , one needs to keep retardation effects at least to lowest non - vanishing order in order to achieve the same results . the green function of the dalembert equation in the lorentz gauge has the form : @xmath111 the reduced lagrangian @xmath112 in this case reads ( with @xmath113 ) : @xmath114 where the potential of electromagnetic interparticle interaction is @xmath115 j^\mu(\tp,\bxp ) .\ ] ] thus , the lagrangian ( [ 2 ] ) is nonlocal in time . because of this the standard hamiltonization procedure is not applicable . in order to employ the canonical hamiltonian formalism it is necessary to convert this lagrangian to single - time form . we shall do so by employing a procedure which takes into account the retardation effects approximately . using the substitution @xmath116 in ( [ 3 ] ) and expanding the current @xmath88 in a taylor series in @xmath117 , we obtain the result @xmath118 which reduces the potential ( [ 3 ] ) to the form : @xmath119 where @xmath120 . the functions @xmath121 and @xmath122 satisfy the relation @xmath123 the terms of odd power in @xmath117 in the expansion ( [ 4 ] ) vanish , because @xmath124 is an even function of @xmath117 ( _ c.f . _ ( [ 6 ] ) , ( [ 7 ] ) ) . as a result , the interaction lagrangian @xmath125 ( up to surface terms ) takes the following single - time form : @xmath126 where @xmath127 ( hereafter we omit the common time argument @xmath128 ) . the quantized theory based on the lagrangian @xmath129 ( the coulomb qed mentioned in section 3 ) was discussed in @xcite . it takes into account the relativistic kinematics of the fermion fields exactly , but describes their electromagnetic interaction with the transverse - photon " part turned off . the terms @xmath130 and @xmath131 can be treated as first - order corrections to @xmath132 , thus providing the approximate single - time form @xmath133 for the reduced nonlocal lagrangian @xmath112 ( _ c.f . _ eq . ( [ 1.11 ] ) ) . other terms following from the expansion are corrections of higher order . they will not be considered in the present paper . the lagrangian @xmath134 leads to euler - lagrange equations which are second - order in time derivatives , because of the term @xmath131 . thus , it describes the system with twice as many degrees of freedom as @xmath132 does , because @xmath60 are no longer the conjugate momenta of @xmath31 . this changes completely the dynamical content of the fields @xmath31 and @xmath32 . since the second - order time derivatives occur in small terms only , they should be eliminated by means of the euler - lagrange equations of a lower - order approximation . but the resulting field equations are then not necessarily the euler - lagrange equations of a known lagrangian . thus the transition to the hamiltonian and to a canonical quantum description becomes unclear . to avoid this difficulty it is tempting to eliminate the time derivative of the charge density @xmath135 directly in @xmath131 by taking into account the conservation law @xmath136 this conservation law is a consequence of the euler - lagrange equations , which follow from the reduced lagrangian @xmath112 as well as from the truncated one @xmath132 . however , the direct use of the equations of motion ( or their consequences ) in the lagrangian is not a correct procedure : it changes the equations of motion themselves . this fact was first emphasized in the case of the golubenkov - smorodinskii lagrangian @xcite and then subsequently discussed in the literature @xcite-@xcite . instead , one can use the method of double zero " , used in refs . @xcite . in our case this consists of the following modification of the lagrangian : @xmath137 where @xmath138 it is easy to see that the term @xmath139 possesses the property : @xmath140 so that it does not change the variational problem to the accuracy required . on the other hand , it cancels those terms of @xmath134 which are quadratic in time derivatives of the fields . thus the modified lagrangian @xmath141 yields equations of motion , which are first order in the time derivatives of the particle fields @xmath142 . next , we perform the following transformation of the field variables : @xmath143 where @xmath144 the transformation ( [ 17 ] ) can be regarded as an approximate @xmath145 gauge transformation , which however is not canonical due to the dependence of @xmath146 on the fields . this transformation removes time derivatives from the interaction part of @xmath147 . to the accuracy required , and up to surface terms , lagrangian @xmath141 can be written in the form @xmath148 where the notations @xmath149 , @xmath150 , _ etc . _ mean that the fields @xmath31 , @xmath32 are replaced by @xmath151 , @xmath152 . integrating the last term of @xmath141 by parts , omitting surface terms , and using equations ( [ 6 ] ) and ( [ 8 ] ) , we reduce the lagrangian @xmath141 to the form @xmath153 where @xmath154 this formulation allows us to treat the variables @xmath155 and @xmath156as the canonical conjugates of @xmath151 and @xmath152 , respectively . that is , we impose the anticommutation relations ( [ 2.2 ] ) on the underscored fields , and not on the original ones , when performing the quantization . thereafter , since the hamiltonian @xmath157 is formally identical with the coulomb gauge hamiltonian ( _ c.f . _ ( [ 2.1 ] ) with ( [ 4.4 ] ) ) , calculations like those of section 4 lead to the breit equation ( [ 4.5 ] ) . although two fermion equations have been around since the 1920s , their full reduction to radial form is of more recent vintage ( see , for example @xcite , @xcite ) . the reduction of equation ( [ 4.5 ] ) to radial form is essentially the same as presented in ref . @xcite , hence all the details shall not be repeated here . as shown in @xcite , we note that eq.([4.5 ] ) has the schrdinger equation as a non - relativistic limit , and the dirac equation as a one - body limit if one of @xmath158 . for the two - fermion state @xmath159 , eq . ( [ 3.8 ] ) , to be simultaneously an eigenstate of @xmath160 , @xmath161 , and parity , the bispinor " @xmath162 $ ] must be of the form @xmath163,\ ] ] for @xmath164 parity eigenstates , and @xmath165,\ ] ] for @xmath166 parity eigenstates . the @xmath167 angular `` bispinor harmonics '' @xmath168 , @xmath169 , @xmath170 , @xmath171 , for given total angular momentum quantum numbers @xmath172 and @xmath173 , are @xmath174,\ ] ] @xmath175,\ ] ] @xmath176,\ ] ] and @xmath177 . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] we note that @xmath178 is antisymmetric and @xmath179 are symmetric matrices . furthermore @xmath180 , @xmath181 and @xmath182 correspond to opposite parity because @xmath183 and @xmath184 , @xmath178 have @xmath185 whereas @xmath182 have @xmath186 . these four bispinor harmonics form an orthonormal set , in the sense that @xmath187 , where @xmath188 and the integrations are taken over the entire solid angle . the eight radial functions in the bispinors ( [ 6 - 1 ] ) and ( [ 6 - 2 ] ) are solutions of the coupled radial equations that are obtained by substituting ( [ 6 - 1 ] ) , ( [ 6 - 2 ] ) into equation ( [ 4.5 ] ) and equating the coefficients of the four independent bispinor harmonics . we make use of the following identities in carrying out the radial reduction : @xmath189 where @xmath190 is any @xmath167 bispinor harmonic , @xmath191 a radial function , and @xmath192 , and @xmath193 . in addition , we note the following useful properties of the above bispinors harmonics : @xmath194 where @xmath195 it is evident from equations ( [ 6 - 1 ] ) and ( [ 6 - 2 ] ) that , in general , eight coupled radial equations are obtained , for arbitrary @xmath26 . for the @xmath196 states , namely the @xmath197 and @xmath198 states , only two linearly independent bispinor harmonics arise , namely @xmath178 and @xmath199 ( equations ( [ 6 - 3 ] ) and ( [ 6 - 6 ] ) ) , and so @xmath200 in equations ( [ 6 - 1 ] ) and ( [ 6 - 2 ] ) . ( here , as elsewhere , we give in brackets the nonrelativistic limit designation , @xmath201 , corresponding to the @xmath93 state in question . ) thus there is only one set of four coupled radial equations for each of @xmath202 and @xmath203 states : @xmath204 @xmath205 @xmath206 @xmath207 where @xmath208 , @xmath209 , the potential @xmath210 ( @xmath211 ) , and @xmath212 is the eigenenergy ( two - particle bound - state mass ) to be determined , while @xmath213 ( @xmath214 ) for the @xmath197 states and @xmath215 ( @xmath216 ) for the @xmath198 states . as shown in ref . @xcite , eqs . ( [ 7 - 1 ] ) - ( [ 7 - 4 ] ) have the expected schrdinger nonrelativistic limit , and the dirac one - body limit . we note that the case with @xmath217 corresponds to the simplified model without transverse - photon interactions , that is the ` coulomb qed ' model of ref . similarly for @xmath217 , if the potential is @xmath218 , and the sign of the potential is reversed in ( [ 7 - 2 ] ) and ( [ 7 - 3 ] ) we recover the @xmath219 radial equation of the yukawa model discussed in ref . @xcite , for which the inter fermion interaction is via a ( massive or massless ) scalar mediating field . we should point out that equations ( [ 7 - 1 ] ) - ( [ 7 - 4 ] ) , like the dirac equations , have both positive and negative energy solutions . indeed , in this two - body case , there are solutions of four types : @xmath220 , @xmath221 , @xmath222 and @xmath223 , as can be seen most easily from the @xmath224 case . of these , two are positive energy and two are negative energy solutions . since we do not have analytic solutions for the eigenenergies of the present qed case , it is useful to illustrate this phenomenon on the scalar yukawa ( or wick - cutkosky " ) model , in which scalar particles interact via a massive or massless mediating field . for such a scalar model , analytic expressions for the two - body bound state energy eigenvalues are available in the massless - exchange case @xcite : @xmath225 where @xmath226 is the effective dimensionless coupling constant , analogous to the fine structure constant of qed , and @xmath227 is the principal quantum number . the @xmath228 in eq . ( [ 7 - 4a ] ) correspond to two segments of a distorted semicircle . the upper branch of this distorted semicircle corresponds to the upper ( positive ) sign in ( [ 7 - 4a ] ) . it begins from @xmath229 at @xmath224 ( indeed , @xmath230 for @xmath231 ) , and decreases to a @xmath232 at the critical value of @xmath233 , beyond which @xmath96 ceases to be real , and the wave functions cease to be normalizable . the lower branch , by contrast , begins from @xmath234 at @xmath235 and rises monotonically to meet the upper branch at the same critical point @xmath236 . these @xmath237 type bound state eigenenergies do not have the correct balmer limit , since for this branch @xmath238 for @xmath239 , but @xmath240 for @xmath241 . thus , this mixed energy " @xmath242 bound - state spectrum must be regarded as unphysical . there are also negative - energy solutions of the @xmath243 and @xmath244 type , but they are not bound - states , since the potential effectively reverses sign for the negative - energy solutions ( as happens also in the dirac - coulomb case ) . the same type of behaviour of the energy spectrum is observed in another analytically solvable case , namely a fermion and a scalar particle interacting via massless scalar quantum exchange @xcite thus , we expect that the energy eigenvalue spectrum of ( [ 7 - 1 ] ) - ( [ 7 - 4 ] ) will be qualitatively similar to that of the scalar exchange models just described . we have not been able to determine solutions to the coupled radial equations ( [ 7 - 1])-([7 - 4 ] ) in terms of common analytic functions . it is of interest , therefore , to consider the properties and general behaviour of the solutions before commencing with numerical solutions . in analogy with the scalar model just described , and with the coulomb qed case @xcite we expect that , as @xmath226 increases , the eigenenergy spectrum @xmath245 of equations ( [ 7 - 1])-([7 - 4 ] ) will have a qualitative behaviour similar to that of the dirac spectrum , namely that @xmath245 decreases monotonically from @xmath246 until @xmath226 hits a critical value @xmath247 , beyond which @xmath245 ceases to be real . it is possible to infer the value of @xmath247 by considering the ultra - relativistic limit , @xmath248 , in which case we can neglect the masses @xmath249 and @xmath250 , and seek solutions of ( [ 7 - 1])-([7 - 4 ] ) with @xmath251 . ( this approach , when applied to the one - body dirac - coulomb case , yields the correct critical values @xmath252 . ) in this ultra - relativistic approximation , equations ( [ 7 - 1])-([7 - 4 ] ) have the solutions @xmath253 , @xmath254 , @xmath255 ( i.e. @xmath256 ) with @xmath257 , which gives @xmath258 for all @xmath219 states . note however , that this result does not mean that the value of the two - fermion rest mass @xmath96 at @xmath247 is necessarily the same for the @xmath259 and @xmath260 states ( certainly , such is not the case in the one - body limit ) . note , also that the result , @xmath261 for @xmath262 states is independent of the masses , that is we expect it to be the same for all finite @xmath263 . the value @xmath261 is different , and somewhat larger , than the known one - body limit ( dirac - coulomb ) value of @xmath264 for @xmath265 states . also , this value is much smaller that the value @xmath266 , which is obtained for the two - fermion coulomb qed case ( where @xmath217 ) for @xmath262 states . for the coulomb potential @xmath267 , where @xmath268 , it is often convenient to rescale the radial variable , that is to let @xmath269 , where @xmath270 is a suitable scale parameter . for example , the radial functions @xmath271 , @xmath128 , @xmath272 , @xmath273 have the large @xmath274 ( negligible @xmath275 and @xmath276 ) behaviour @xmath277 , etc . , for positive energy @xmath23 bound states , where @xmath270 is given by @xmath278[e^2 - m_-^2]}\over { 4e^2 } } \qquad { \rm or } \qquad { 1\over { a^2 } } = m^2 - \left({e\over 2}\right)^2 \quad { \rm if } \quad m_1=m_2 .\ ] ] eq . ( [ 7 - 5 ] ) implies that @xmath270 is positive only for @xmath279 , which means that the bound state spectrum must lie in this domain ( _ c.f . _ ( [ 7 - 4a ] ) ) . from this , and in analogy with the scalar model results , we can infer that the critical value @xmath280 lies between @xmath281 and @xmath282 , and likely closer to the former rather than the latter . with the rescaling @xmath269 , equations ( [ 7 - 1])-([7 - 4 ] ) become modified slightly , in that @xmath274 is replaced by @xmath283 in all of them . for purposes of numerical integration of the radial equations the scale parameter @xmath270 can be chosen to be anything that is convenient , be it that given in eq . ( [ 7 - 5 ] ) , or @xmath284 or @xmath285 , or whatever . for a power series analysis of the radial equations it is useful to make the replacement @xmath286 , etc . assuming solutions of the form @xmath287,\ ] ] @xmath288,\ ] ] @xmath289,\ ] ] @xmath290,\ ] ] we find , upon substitution into the radial equations for @xmath291 , @xmath292 , @xmath293 , @xmath294 and equating coefficients of powers of @xmath295 , that the coefficients @xmath296 must satisfy the following recursion relations : @xmath297 @xmath298 @xmath299 @xmath300 where @xmath301 . if @xmath302 then ( [ 7 - 10])-([7 - 13 ] ) are the recursion relations for the power series representations of the functions @xmath303 , etc . , rather than for @xmath304 , etc . for @xmath305 , and bearing in mind that @xmath306 , ( [ 7 - 10])-([7 - 13 ] ) yield four coupled homogeneous equations for the parameters @xmath307 , @xmath308 , @xmath309 , @xmath310 , which have non - trivial ( and non - singular ) solutions only if @xmath311 for the @xmath23 states , for any values of @xmath249 , @xmath250 , whereupon @xmath312 the condition ( [ 7 - 14 ] ) implies that the radial equations have real bound state solutions of the form ( [ 7 - 6])-([7 - 9 ] ) only for @xmath313 , for any values of @xmath249 and @xmath250 . this , in turn , implies that @xmath314 for the @xmath315 states for any ( finite ) values of @xmath249 and @xmath250 , in agreement with the ultra relativistic limit discussed above . this condition for bound states , @xmath316 , is additional to the one that follows from eq . ( [ 7 - 5 ] ) , namely that @xmath317 . the recursion relations ( [ 7 - 10])-([7 - 13 ] ) , with ( [ 7 - 14 ] ) and ( [ 7 - 15 ] ) , can be used to generate the power series form of the solutions of eqs . ( [ 7 - 6])-([7 - 9 ] ) . these series converge in the domain @xmath318 , as discussed below and in @xcite . such a series can be used , for example , as a starting procedure for the numerical integration of the radial equations ( [ 7 - 1])-([7 - 4 ] ) . unlike in the dirac case , the recursion relations ( [ 7 - 10])-([7 - 13 ] ) do not admit power series solutions of the form ( [ 7 - 6])-([7 - 9 ] ) , which terminate at the same power , say @xmath319 , so that @xmath320 . in particular , the ground state solution is not of the simple form @xmath321 as it is for the two radial dirac equations . this is perhaps to be expected , since in the dirac case there are only two functions , say @xmath291 and @xmath292 , and four unknowns to be determined , namely @xmath322 , @xmath323 , @xmath270 and @xmath96 . since the two coupled radial dirac equations yield four equations ( the coefficients of @xmath324 and of @xmath325 ) , it is not surprising that a solution is obtained . in the present case , we have four coupled radial equations ( [ 7 - 1])-([7 - 4 ] ) , which yield eight equations ( the coefficients of @xmath324 and of @xmath325 ) to be satisfied by the six unknowns of the proposed solutions ( [ 7 - 16 ] ) , namely @xmath308 , @xmath309 , @xmath310 , @xmath323 , @xmath270 and @xmath96 . thus the system is overdetermined and no solution of the form ( [ 7 - 16 ] ) is possible . this situation persists for any solution of the form ( [ 7 - 6])-([7 - 9 ] ) where the polynomials all terminate at the same degree . therefore , we shall solve the radial equations ( [ 7 - 1])-([7 - 4 ] ) numerically . equations ( [ 7 - 1 ] ) - ( [ 7 - 4 ] ) are not independent . indeed , elementary manipulations of these equations , namely subtracting eq . ( [ 7 - 4 ] ) from eq . ( [ 7 - 1 ] ) and similarly eq . ( [ 7 - 3 ] ) from eq . ( [ 7 - 2 ] ) show that [ 7 - 6a ] v(r ) = e - m_+ - ( 1- ) v(r ) s(r ) , u(r ) = e - m_- - ( 1-)v(r ) t(r ) . thus , the number of equations can be reduced from four to two . we introduce the auxiliary functions @xmath326 and @xmath327 . then , adding eqs . ( [ 7 - 1 ] ) to eq . ( [ 7 - 4 ] ) and eq . ( [ 7 - 2 ] ) to eq . ( [ 7 - 3 ] ) , and using eq . ( [ 7 - 6a ] ) yields the equations [ 7 - 7a ] f^ ( r ) = k r f(r ) + w_g ( r ) g(r ) , -g^ ( r ) = k r g(r ) + w_f ( r ) f(r ) , where [ 7 - 8a ] w_g ( r ) = 1 2 , [ 7 - 9a ] w_f ( r ) = 1 2 , and where @xmath328 for the present qed case in the coulomb gauge , for the @xmath259 states ( for which @xmath214 ) , @xmath329 while @xmath330 and @xmath331 . in this case we see that @xmath332 is singular at @xmath333 , where @xmath334 is the reduced mass and @xmath335 is the reduced bohr radius . this singular point is quite close to the origin ( in units of the reduced bohr radius ) for small @xmath226 . the appearance of this singularity may signal difficulties in the numerical determination of eigensolutions of the equations ( [ 7 - 7a ] ) by standard shooting " methods . for the @xmath198 states ( for which @xmath216 ) , the singularity at @xmath336 occurs in @xmath337 , but only if @xmath338 . thus for the equal - mass @xmath260 states , equations ( [ 7 - 7a ] ) have only the usual @xmath339 singularities at the origin , and are amenable to solution by standard methods , as discussed below . equations ( [ 7 - 7a ] ) can be written in the matrix form [ 8 - 1 ] h |= | h = , = , and where @xmath340 . if @xmath341 is replaced by @xmath342 and @xmath337 by @xmath343 , where @xmath344 , then eq . ( [ 7 - 7a ] ) , or ( [ 8 - 1 ] ) , is equivalent to the radial schrdinger equation . the first - order correction to the non relativistic energy @xmath345 is then given by [ 8 - 2 ] = _ nr | h- h_nr| _ nr = f _ nr | - _ nr + w_f ^nr - w_f | f_nr + g _ nr | - _ nr + w_g ^nr - w_g | g_nr if we expand the coefficients @xmath346 and @xmath337 ( eqs . ( [ 7 - 8 ] ) and ( [ 7 - 9 ] ) ) in powers of @xmath347 , and keep only the lowest - order terms , we obtain [ 8 - 2a ] - _ nr + w_f ^nr - w_f ( _ nr - v_)^2 [ 8 - 2b ] - _ nr + w_g ^nr - w_g - ( 1 - 2 ) _ nr + 1 2 v_+ ^2 v _ , where @xmath348 . this leads to the following @xmath24 correction to the non - relativistic energy for the @xmath23 states : @xmath349 \nonumber \\ - \left ( 1 - 2 { \mu \over { m_+ } } \right ) \epsilon _ { \rm nr } \ , \langle \langle 1 \rangle \rangle + { 1 \over 2}\left ( ( 1 + \eta ) + ( 1 - \eta ) \delta^2 \right ) \langle \langle v \rangle \rangle . \label{8 - 3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we use the notation @xmath350 but @xmath351 . for the @xmath352 states ( for which @xmath213 and @xmath353 ) this formula gives for the lowest order relativistic correction the result [ 8 - 4 ] ( 0 ^ - ( n ^1s_0 ) ) = ^4 \ { 1 n^4 ( 3 8 - 1 8 m_+ ) + 1 n^3 ( -1 2 + 2 m_+ ) } which becomes @xmath354 in the equal mass @xmath241 case . this does not agree with the known positronium value of @xmath355 @xcite . this is not surprising , since the breit equation , without modification , is known to give the incorrect fine structure for hydrogen and positronium . brown and ravenhall @xcite argue that the reason for this , is the mixing of positive and negative energy one - particle states ( which arises , in our formalism , because of our use of the `` empty '' vacuum ( [ 3.4 ] ) ) . this difficulty of the unmodified breit equation is discussed in various works ( _ e.g. _ refs . the modification that is needed to bring the result into agreement with the observed fine structure of h or ps is to subtract off the expectation value of the operator @xcite [ 8 - 7 ] h^= ^2 ( 3 - 2 _ 1 _ 2 + _ 2r ) _ ir = _ i / r , where , in this equation , we use the notation of @xcite . the expectation value of ( [ 8 - 7 ] ) ( with respect to the non - relativistic eigenfunctions ) is [ 8 - 8 ] h^_nr = ^4 1 -^2 f_s = ^4 4 f_s m_+ , where @xmath356 for the singlet @xmath357 states , while @xmath358 for the triplet @xmath359 states with @xmath360 , but @xmath361 for the triplet states with @xmath23 ( see , also , section 10 below ) . the expression ( [ 8 - 8 ] ) gives the value @xmath362 for the equal - mass ground state , which , when subtracted from the ` breit ' value of @xmath363 gives the expected positronium result @xmath364 . more generally for arbitrary masses , if we subtract ( [ 8 - 8 ] ) from the expression ( [ 8 - 3 ] ) , we obtain the corrected " result [ 8 - 9 ] _ c ( n 0 ^ - ( ^1s_0 ) ) = ^4 \ { 1 n^4 ( 3 8 - 1 8 m_+ ) + 1 n^3 ( -1 2 - 2 m_+ ) } . this same result ( [ 8 - 9 ] ) was obtained previously for the @xmath365 state by darewych and horbatsch @xciteb , who used a perturbative approximation on variationally derived equations . somewhat surprisingly , the unequal - mass @xmath24 corrections for arbitrary states seem to have been worked out fully only relatively recently . we refer to the work of connell @xcite , who used a quasipotential formalism based on the work of todorov @xcite , and of hersbach @xcite , who used a formalism based on a relativistic generalization of the lippmann - schwinger equation due to de groot and ruijgrok @xcite . our corrected expression ( [ 8 - 9 ] ) agrees with the results of these authors . ( the @xmath24 corrections for hydrogen and muonium quoted in standard references are expansions in @xmath263 ( _ e.g. _ @xcite , @xcite . ) ) for the @xmath366 states ( for which @xmath215 and @xmath367 ) equation ( [ 8 - 3 ] ) gives [ 8 - 5 ] ( n 0^+ ( ^3p_0 ) ) = ^4 \ { 1 n^4 ( 3 8 - 1 8 m_+ ) + 1 n^3 ( - 1 2 - 2 3 m_+ ) } , which _ does _ agree , in the equal mass case , with the ps values for all the @xmath368 states , as well as with the unequal - mass expressions of connell @xcite and hersbach @xcite for these states . this agreement implies that the correction " @xmath369 vanishes for the @xmath370 states , as indeed it does . we might note , in passing , that formula ( [ 8 - 3 ] ) gives the correct @xmath24 results for the coulomb qed ( @xmath371 ) case @xcite , for which the @xmath146 coefficients are non - singular for @xmath372 . in the case of equal masses @xmath373 the radial equations ( [ 7 - 7a ] ) for @xmath374 states are free of singularities . thus the boundary value problem is well posed , and it can be solved by means of a standard numerical ode - solving procedure . we solved it by the shooting " method using the maple runge - kutta programme . the corresponding perturbative spectrum ( _ c.f . _ ( [ 8 - 5 ] ) ) , @xmath375 agrees with the orthopositronium spectrum since the contribution of the extra terms ( _ c.f . _ ( [ 8 - 7 ] ) ) ( caused by positive - negative energy mixing ) vanishes in this case . in the table 1 the numeric and perturbative results are presented for the lowest - energy @xmath260 state ( _ i.e. _ , @xmath23 , @xmath376 , @xmath365 ) for different values of @xmath377 . . values of @xmath378 for the @xmath365 , @xmath203 state ( @xmath379 ) . [ cols= " < , < , < " , ] note that the critical value of the two - body mass , @xmath380 , increases with @xmath227 , in contrast to the scalar model , for which @xmath381 for all @xmath227 . figure 1 is a plot of the unnormalized reduced radial wave functions @xmath303 , @xmath382 and @xmath383 ( see eqns . ( [ 7 - 1])-([7 - 4 ] ) ) in the case of equal massless , @xmath379 , for the lowest - energy @xmath384 states , when @xmath385 . these wave functions are qualitatively similar to those obtained for these states in the coulomb qed case @xcite . the `` large '' component @xmath303 is nodeless while the `` small '' components @xmath382 and the `` doubly small '' one @xmath383 have one node . the node at the origin , @xmath386 , is a consequence of our use of reduced radial wave functions @xmath303 , etc . , rather than the actual @xmath387 , etc . indeed , the wave functions behave at small @xmath274 as follows : @xmath388 where @xmath389 ( see eq . ( [ 7 - 16 ] ) ) . thus the matrix wave function @xmath390 is singular , @xmath391 , as happens also in the one - body dirac equation with a coulomb potential . nevertheless , @xmath390 is normalizable for all @xmath226 up to and including @xmath392 , at which point @xmath393 , as can be seen in figures 2 and 3 . figure 3 represents the excited @xmath394 state for the critical coupling strength @xmath261 . in this case , the wavefunction @xmath303 has one node while @xmath395 and @xmath383 have two nodes . this behaviour differs from that found in cqed @xcite for the same case ( where the number of nodes was two , one and three , respectively ) . in the @xmath396 case ( figure 4 ) each of the functions @xmath303 , @xmath395 and @xmath383 gets one more node . this tendency likely continues for higher values of the quantum number @xmath227 . for states with @xmath397 , the eigenstate problem reduces to a set of eight first - order differential equations for the functions @xmath398 and the energy @xmath96 ( _ c.f . _ eqns . ( [ 6 - 1 ] ) and ( [ 6 - 2 ] ) ) . it is convenient to present this set in the following matrix form . let us introduce the 8-dimensional vector - function : @xmath399.\ ] ] then the set of radial equations reads : @xmath400 where the 8@xmath4018 matrix @xmath402 has the following structure : @xmath403/r.\ ] ] here @xmath404 is the unit matrix , @xmath405 is diagonal , @xmath406,\ ] ] @xmath208 , and the form of 8@xmath4018 matrices @xmath407 , @xmath408 , and @xmath409 depends on the parity @xmath410 : @xmath411,{\label{r7}}\\ { \mbox{\ssb g } } & = & \left[\mbox{\scriptsize$ \begin{array}{cccccccc } 0 & 0 & -(j{+}1)a & -jb & -(j{+}1)a & -jb & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & ( j{+}1)b & -ja & -(j{+}1)b & ja & 0 & 0\\ -(j{+}1)a & ( j{+}1)b & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -(j{+}1)a & -(j{+}1)b\\ -jb & -ja & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -jb & ja\\ -(j{+}1)a & -(j{+}1)b & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -(j{+}1)a & ( j{+}1)b\\ -jb & ja & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -jb & -ja\\ 0 & 0 & -(j{+}1)a & -jb & -(j{+}1)a & -jb & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -(j{+}1)b & ja & ( j{+}1)b & -ja & 0 & 0 \end{array}$ } \right],{\label{r8}}\\ { \mbox{\ssb s } } & = & \left[\mbox{\scriptsize$ \begin{array}{cccccccc } 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -b^2&-ab & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -ab & -a^2 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -b^2 & -ab & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -ab & -a^2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}$ } \right]{\label{r9}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for @xmath412 , and @xmath413,{\label{r10}}\\ { \mbox{\ssb g } } & = & \left[\mbox{\scriptsize$ \begin{array}{cccccccc } 0 & 0 & ( j{+}1)a & -(j{+}1)b & ( j{+}1)a & ( j{+}1)b & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & jb & ja & jb & -ja & 0 & 0\\ ( j{+}1)a & jb & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & ( j{+}1)a & jb\\ -(j{+}1)b & ja & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & ( j{+}1)b & -ja\\ ( j{+}1)a & jb & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & ( j{+}1)a & jb\\ ( j{+}1)b & -ja & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -(j{+}1)b & ja\\ 0 & 0 & ( j{+}1)a & ( j{+}1)b & ( j{+}1)a & -(j{+}1)b & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & jb & -ja & jb & ja & 0 & 0 \end{array}$ } \right],{\label{r11}}\\ { \mbox{\ssb s } } & = & \left[\mbox{\scriptsize$ \begin{array}{cccccccc } 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -b^2 & -ab\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -ab & -a^2\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ -b^2 & -ab & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ -ab & -a^2 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array}$ } \right]{\label{r12}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for @xmath414 , where @xmath415 , @xmath416 and @xmath417 are defined in eq . ( [ 6.14 ] ) . due to the properties @xmath418 the `` radial '' hamiltonian @xmath419 is a hermitian operator with respect to the inner product @xmath420 where the subscript 8 " denotes the dimensions of the vector - functions @xmath421 . in the subsequent reduction of the set ( [ r4 ] ) one can use the fact that @xmath422 ( for either parity ) . thus one can reduce the number of differential equations from 8 to 4 . we perform this reduction in a way that ensures , as far as possible , the hamiltonian structure of the equations . first of all we perform the orthogonal transformation : @xmath423 where @xmath424,\quad p=(-)^{j\pm1},{\label{r17}}\\ { \mbox{\ssb e } } & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left[\mbox{\scriptsize$ \begin{array}{cccccccc } 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ -a & b & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -a & b\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\\ -b & -a & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & b & a\\ b & a & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & b & a\\ a & -b & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & -a & b\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \end{array}$ } \right],\quad p=(-)^{j}{\label{r18}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it preserves the inner product ( [ r15 ] ) and reduces the equations ( [ r4 ] ) to the form : @xmath425 it is convenient at this stage to express the 8-dimensional vectors and matrices in terms of 4-dimensional blocks : @xmath426 , \qquad \tilde{{\mbox{\ssb v}}}(r ) \equiv \tilde{{\mbox{\ssb u}}}(r ) - e{{\mbox{\ssb i}}}= \left [ \begin{array}{cc } \tilde{{\mbox{\ssb v}}}_{11}(r)&\tilde{{\mbox{\ssb v}}}_{12}(r)\\ \tilde{{\mbox{\ssb v}}}_{21}(r)&\tilde{{\mbox{\ssb v}}}_{22}(r ) \end{array } \right ] , \qquad { \it etc.}\ ] ] then the matrix @xmath427 takes the form @xmath428 , \qquad \tilde{{\mbox{\ssb h}}}_{11 } = 2\left [ \begin{array}{cc } { \mbox{\ssb j } } & { \mbox{\ssb 0}}\\ { \mbox{\ssb 0 } } & { \mbox{\ssb j } } \end{array}\right ] , \qquad { \mbox{\ssb j } } = \left [ \begin{array}{cc } 0 & -1\\ 1 & 0 \end{array}\right],\ ] ] and the set of eqs . ( [ r19 ] ) becomes @xmath429 the set ( [ r23 ] ) is purely algebraic . it permits us to express @xmath430 in the terms of @xmath431 : @xmath432 substitution of ( [ r24 ] ) into ( [ r22 ] ) yields the closed set of four first - order differential equations : @xmath433 where @xmath434.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here the upper sign corresponds to @xmath435 , and the lower sign corresponds to @xmath414 . the operator @xmath436 in eq . ( [ r25 ] ) is formally hermitian , _ i.e. _ , given @xmath96 , it is hermitian with respect to the inner product @xmath437 . but any two solutions of ( [ r25 ] ) , @xmath438 and @xmath439 , corresponding to different values of the energy , @xmath96 and @xmath440 , are not orthogonal . this is due to the nonlinear dependence of @xmath436 on @xmath96 . orthogonality can be instated by using the following definition of inner product : @xmath441 this inner product follows directly by substitution of eq . ( [ r24 ] ) into eq . ( [ r15 ] ) . the set of first order equations ( [ r25 ] ) can also be expressed as a second order equation . for this purposeit is convenient to permute the elements of @xmath438 by means of the matrix @xmath442 , where @xmath443 \quad { \rm for } \quad p=(-)^{j\pm1},{\label{r27}}\ ] ] and @xmath444 \quad { \rm for } \quad p=(-)^{j } . { \label{r28}}\ ] ] then , in terms of the two - dimensional blocks @xmath445 , \ ] ] the equations take the form @xmath446 where @xmath447 . elimination of @xmath448 leads to the following equation for the @xmath449 vector - function @xmath450 : @xmath451\psi_1(r ) = 0.\ ] ] eigenstates @xmath450 , @xmath452 corresponding to different values of the energy are orthogonal with respect to the inner product : @xmath453 which also follows from the reduction procedure . the form of equations ( [ r32 ] ) is convenient for examining the energy spectrum of @xmath26 bound states perturbatively to @xmath24 . for this purpose we introduce the dimensionless quantities , @xmath454 where @xmath455 is the reduced mass . we now perform a perturbative expansion in @xmath226 of equation ( [ r32 ] ) . to order @xmath456 equation ( [ r32 ] ) takes the hamiltonian form ( hereafter we omit the subscript 1 " of the wave function @xmath450 ) : @xmath457 where @xmath458\ ] ] is a two - component wave function , @xmath419 is the hamiltonian divided by @xmath459 and expressed in terms of dimensionless quantities ( [ p1 ] ) , @xmath460 is the unperturbed ( i.e. , @xmath54th - order ) hamiltonian , and @xmath461 is the perturbative correction to ( [ p4 ] ) . the form of the symmetric @xmath462 matrices @xmath463 , @xmath464 , @xmath465 depends on the parity . in order to obtain the energy spectrum to @xmath24 , it is sufficient to calculate the eigenvalues of @xmath117 to @xmath466 , _ i.e. _ , @xmath467 , where @xmath468 will be calculated exactly , while for @xmath469 first order perturbation theory in @xmath456 is sufficient . hence , the dependence of @xmath470 on @xmath117 is not crucial : to the accuracy required , it can be replaced by@xmath468 . in addition , the kernel of the inner product ( [ r32a ] ) can be set to unity . in the case @xmath412 we have @xmath471 , so that @xmath472 is the ( dimensionless ) radial coulomb hamiltonian @xmath473 with the angular momentum @xmath474 , repeated twice : @xmath475 , \qquad h_j = -{1 \over 2 } \left\{\frac{d}{d\rho^2 } - \frac{j(j+1)}{\rho^2}\right\ } - \frac{1}{\rho } .\ ] ] the matrices @xmath464 and @xmath476 are @xmath477,{\label{p7}}\\ { \cal m}(\rho,\lambda)&= & \frac18\left[\mbox{\scriptsize$ \begin{array}{cc } ( 1-\delta^2)\lambda(\lambda-\frac2{\rho } ) + \frac{1-\delta^2 - c^2\lambda ( 1+\delta^2)}{\rho^2}+\frac{1+\delta^2(1 -2c^2)}{\rho^3 } & \frac{2c\delta}{\rho^3}\\ \frac{2c\delta}{\rho^3 } & ( 1-\delta^2)\lambda^2 - \frac{c^2(1+\delta^2)}{\rho^2}(\lambda+\frac1{\rho } ) \end{array}$ } \ ! \right ] { \label{p8}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the eigenvalues of the @xmath54th - order hamiltonian ( [ p6 ] ) , namely @xmath478 are two - fold degenerate , each with the two eigenstates @xmath479 \qquad { \rm and } \qquad \psi_{(2)}^{(0 ) } = \left[\begin{array}{c } 0\\ \end{array } \right],\ ] ] where @xmath480 is a solution of the coulomb problem @xmath481 . thus , the correction @xmath469 must be calculated appropriately for the degenerate situation : @xmath482,\ ] ] where the matrix @xmath483 is defined as follows : @xmath484.{\label{p12}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the mass spectrum @xmath485 obtained with the use of ( [ p9 ] ) , ( [ p11 ] ) and ( [ p12 ] ) coincides neither with the muonium spectrum found in @xcite nor ( if @xmath486 ) with the spectrum of parapositronium ( see @xcite and refs . therein ) . the reason , like for the @xmath23 states , lies in the use of the empty vacuum ( [ 3.4 ] ) , which leads to single - particle states of positive and negative energy , and subsequently to the breit equation with its spurious term @xmath487 ( [ 8 - 7 ] ) in the hamiltonian @xcite , as discussed in connection with the @xmath23 states . we are going to show that the elimination of the contribution of @xmath487 from the spectrum leads to the correct result . first of all we transform @xmath487 into a radial representation . for this purpose we note that @xmath488 ( @xmath489 in the nonrelativistic limit ) , i.e. , @xmath490 contains only those components of @xmath390 ( [ 6 - 1 ] ) which are coefficients of bispinor harmonics " @xmath491 . similarly , @xmath492 ( @xmath493 in the nonrelativistic limit ) , i.e. , @xmath490 contains only coefficients of the bispinor harmonics " @xmath494 . thus , for @xmath412 parity states the spurious term ( divided by @xmath495 ) takes the following radial form : @xmath496=\frac{1-\delta^2}{8\rho^2}\left[\mbox{\scriptsize$ \begin{array}{cc } 4 & 0\\ 0 & 1 \end{array}$ } \right ] , \ ] ] where @xmath497 , and the corresponding matrix elements are @xmath498 . { \label{p15}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] if we now use @xmath499 , instead of @xmath483 , in ( [ p11 ] ) and ( [ p13 ] ) , we obtain the spectrum , @xmath500 which coincides with the results of connell @xcite and hersbach @xcite for the parity @xmath501 states . thus , correcting for the spurious terms in the breit hamiltonian , we obtain the expected @xmath24 results . in the @xmath502 case , the matrix @xmath463 is not diagonal : @xmath503.\ ] ] it can be diagonalized by means of the orthogonal transformation , using the matrix : @xmath504.\ ] ] then @xmath505,\ ] ] so that the @xmath54th - order hamiltonian becomes : @xmath506.\ ] ] it possesses the doubly degenerate eigenvalues ( [ p9 ] ) with eigenstates : @xmath507 \qquad { \rm and } \qquad \psi_{(2)}^{(0 ) } = \left[\begin{array}{c } 0\\ \end{array } \right],\ ] ] the first - order correction @xmath508 ( [ p5 ] ) , with the matrices @xmath509,{\label{p22}}\ ] ] @xmath510/\rho^2 } } & & \\ & & \hspace{-1em } \lefteqn{\scriptstyle { -a^2[7j^2 + 22j+9 - \delta^2(3j^2 + 8j+3)]/\rho^3 } } & \\ & & & \hspace{-1em } \lefteqn{\scriptstyle { + ( 1-\delta^2)j(j+1)^2(j+4)/\rho^4 } } \hspace{13em } \end{array } & \frac{ab(1-\delta^2)}{\rho}\left(2\lambda+\frac{1 + 2\lambda}{\rho } - \frac{c^2}{\rho^2}\right)\\ \frac{ab(1-\delta^2)}{\rho}\left(2\lambda+\frac{1 + 2\lambda}{\rho } - \frac{c^2}{\rho^2}\right ) & \begin{array}{llll } \lefteqn{\scriptstyle { ( 1-\delta^2)\lambda(\lambda + 2b^2/\rho ) } } & & & \\ & \lefteqn{\scriptstyle { -b^2[\{\lambda(6j^2+j-3)-1\ } - \delta^2\{\lambda(2j^2 + 3j-1)-1\}]/\rho^2 } } & & \\ & & \lefteqn{\scriptstyle { -b^2[7j^2 - 8j-6 - \delta^2(3j^2 - 2j-2)]/\rho^3 } } & \\ & & & \lefteqn{\scriptstyle { + ( 1-\delta^2)j(j+1)^2(j-3)/\rho^4 } } \hspace{16em } \end{array } \end{array}$ } \right ] , { \label{p23}}\ ] ] generates diagonal matrix elements only : @xmath511 \nonumber\\ & = & \left[\mbox{\scriptsize$ \begin{array}{cc } \frac{11+\delta^2}{32n^4 } - \frac{(7+\delta^2)j^2+(17-\delta^2)j+8 - 2\delta^2}{4(2j+1)(j+1)(2j+3)n^3 } & 0\\ 0 & \frac{11+\delta^2}{32n^4 } - \frac{(7+\delta^2)j^2 - 3(1-\delta^2)j-2}{4(2j-1)j(2j+1)n^3 } \end{array}$ } \right].{\label{p24}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the energy spectrum ( [ p13 ] ) with @xmath512 , @xmath513 contains the contribution of the spurious term ( [ 8 - 7 ] ) . again , we present this term in radial form : @xmath514 \nonumber\\ = \frac{1-\delta^2}{8\rho^2 } \left[\mbox{\scriptsize$ \begin{array}{cc } b^2 & ab\\ ab & a^2 \end{array}$ } \right ] , \ ] ] where , for the present @xmath412 parity case , @xmath515 . the corresponding matrix elements are : @xmath516 . { \label{p26}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the substitution of @xmath517 and @xmath518 into ( [ p13 ] ) yields the spectrum : @xmath519 which coincides with the results of connell @xcite and hersbach @xcite for the parity @xmath520 states . we have studied a reformulation of qed , in which the coupled dirac - maxwell field equations are partially decoupled by expressing the mediating photon field in terms of the dirac particle field , using covariant green s functions . this allows us to reformulate the hamiltonian of the theory so that the photon propagator appears directly in a quartic , nonlocal interaction term . we then consider a truncated model , in which there are no free ( physical ) photons . for such a model , each @xmath521-particle segment of the fock space of the quantized , equal - time hamiltonian is an invariant space , that is , there is no coupling among the various @xmath521-fermion segments . this is achieved by introducing an unconventional `` empty '' vacuum state . as a consequence , there exist exact few - particle eigenstates of the truncated hamiltonian , which lead to dirac - like two- and three - fermion wave equations . we show , in particular , that the two - fermion wave equation , in the coulomb gauge , is just the breit equation . for specific @xmath93 states , the breit equation reduces to radial form , and then to dirac - like equations for @xmath23 states , and to a coupled pair of schrdinger - like equations for @xmath26 states . perturbative solution of these equations yields @xmath522-corrections to the nonrelativistic rydberg spectrum , which do not reproduce the muonium spectrum as calculated by connell @xcite and hersbach @xcite ( nor the positronium spectrum in the @xmath486 case ) . the apparent reason for this disagreement is the mixing of positive- and negative - energy states , which is characteristic of the breit equation @xcite . however , agreement is achieved if we subtract the contribution of spurious operator ( [ 8 - 7 ] ) , which appears in the breit equation ( _ c.f . ( [ 8 - 9 ] ) , ( [ 8 - 5 ] ) , ( [ p16 ] ) , ( [ p27 ] ) ) . we have not been able to obtain analytic solutions of the radial equations . these radial wave equations have , in general , a singular point at @xmath523 , where @xmath96 is the two - fermion bound state energy ( rest mass ) . the existence of such an `` interior '' singularity makes it difficult to obtain numerical solutions of the radial boundary value problem by standard methods . the only exception is the case @xmath25 , @xmath486 , for which the radial equations are regular , and which we have therefore studied numerically . ( it is noteworthy that this is the case where the contribution of the operator ( [ 8 - 7 ] ) is zero . ) our numerical results for the equal - mass @xmath25 states , show that the dependence of the energy @xmath96 on the coupling constant @xmath226 is qualitatively similar to that obtained earlier for the coulomb qed model ( for which transverse - photon interactions are ignored ) @xcite . for low @xmath226 , the numerically obtained eigenenergies are in agreement with the result derived perturbatively . thereafter , @xmath245 decreases monotonically to @xmath524 as @xmath226 approaches a critical value @xmath247 . we find that @xmath261 ( in contrast to cqed value of @xmath525 ) . 99 j. w. darewych , annales fond . l. de broglie ( paris ) * 23 * , 15 ( 1998 ) , and `` interparticle interactions and nonlocality in quantum field theory '' in _ causality and locality in modern physics _ , g. hunter et al . ( eds . ) , kluwer academic publishers , dordrecht , 1998 , 333 - 344 . j. w. darewych , can . j. phys . * 76 * , 523 ( 1998 ) . m. barham and j. darewych , j. phys . a * 31 * , 3481 ( 1998 ) . wiley , new york , 1975 ) . j. d. jackson , _ classical electrodynamics _ ( john wiley , new york , 1975 ) . a. o. barut , _ electrodynamics and classical theory of fields and particles _ ( dover , new york , 1980 ) . w. t. grandy , jr . , _ relativistic quantum mechanics of leptons and fields _ ( kluwer , dordrecht , 1991 ) . a. o. barut , `` the schrdinger and dirac equation - linear , nonlinear and integrodifferential '' in _ geometrical and algebraic aspects of nonlinear field theory_. s. de filippo , m. marinaro , g. marmo and g. vilasi , eds . elsevier ( north holland ) , 1989 , pp . darewych and l. di leo , j. phys . a : math . gen . * 29 * , 6817 ( 1996 ) . g. hardekopf and j. sucher , phys . a * 30 * , 703 ( 1984 ) ; * 31 * , 2020 ( 1985 ) . p. m. stevenson and i. roditi , phys . d * 33 * , 2305 ( 1986 ) . r. koniuk and j. w. darewych , phys . b*176 * , 195 ( 1986 ) . w. dykshoorn and r. koniuk , phys . rev . a * 41 * , 64 ( 1990 ) . darewych and m. horbatsch , j. phys . b : at . mol . opt . * 22 * , 973 ( 1989 ) ; * 23 * , 337 ( 1990 ) . j. w. darewych , m. horbatsch and r. koniuk , phys . d * 45 * , 675 ( 1992 ) . b. ding and j. darewych , j. phys . g * 26 * , 907 ( 2000 ) . t. c. scott , j. shertzer and r. a. moore , phys . a * 45 * , 4393 ( 1992 ) . e. e. salpeter , phys . rev . * 87 * , 328 ( 1952 ) . h. a. bethe and e. e. salpeter , _ quantum mechanics of one- and two - electron atoms _ ( springer , berlin , 1957 ) . g. breit , phys . rev . * 34 * , 553 ( 1929 ) . a. eddington , proc . a * 122 * , 358 ( 1929 ) . j. a. gaunt , phil . trans . * 228 * , 151 ( 1929 ) ; proc . roy . soc . a * 122 * , 153 ( 1929 ) . v. n. golubenkov and ia . a. smorodinskii , zh . * 31 * , 40 , ( 1956 ) . jetp * 4 * , 55 ( 1957 ) ] . l. d. landau and e. m. lifshitz , _ the classical theory of fields _ ( pergamon , new york , 1975 ) , 4th revised english edition . b. m. barker and r. f. oconnell , phys . 78a * , 231 ( 1980 ) . b. m. barker and r. f. oconnell , ann . ( n. y. ) * 129 * , 358 ( 1980 ) . g. schfer , phys . lett . * 100a * , 128 ( 1984 ) . b. m. barker and r. f. oconnell , can . j. phys . * 58 * , 1659 ( 1980 ) . r. p. gaida , yu . b. kluchkovsky and v. i. tretyak , in _ constraint s theory and relativistic dynamics . proc . workshop _ , firenze , 1986 , g. longhi and l. lusanna , eds . ( world scientific , singapore , 1987 ) , pp . 210 - 241 . j. malenfent , phys . d * 38 * , 3292 ( 1998 ) ; phys . a * 43 * , 1233 ( 1991 ) . j. darewych , condensed matt . phys . * 1 * , 593 ( 1998 ) . v. shpytko and j. darewych , phys . d * 64 * , 045012 , 2001 . g. e. brown and d. g. ravenhall , proc . ( london ) * a208 * , 552 ( 1951 ) . z. v. chraplyvy , phys . rev . * 91 * , 388 ( 1953 ) . w. a. barker and f. n. glover , phys . * 99 * , 317 ( 1955 ) . j. h. connell , phys . d * 43 * , 1393 ( 1991 ) . i. t. todorov , phys . d * 3 * , 2351 ( 1971 ) . h. hersbach , phys . a * 46 * , 3657 ( 1992 ) . e. h. de groot and th . w. ruijgok , nucl . phys . * 101b * , 95 ( 1975 ) . j. r. sapirstein and d. r. yennie , theory of hydrogenic bound states " , eq . ( 2.3 ) p. 568 , in _ quantum electrodynamics _ , t. kinoshita , ed . , world scientific , singapore , 1990 . p. j. mohr , tests of fundamental physics " , eq . ( 28.39 ) p. 344 , in _ atomic , molecular and optical physics handbook _ , g. w. f. drake , ed . , american institute of physics , woodbury , n. y. , 1996 . Abstract:
[ "we consider a reformulation of qed in which covariant green functions are used to solve for the electromagnetic field in terms of the fermion fields . it is shown that exact few - fermion eigenstates of the resulting hamiltonian can be obtained in the canonical equal - time formalism for the case where there are no free photons . these eigenstates lead to two- and three - body dirac - like equations with electromagnetic interactions . perturbative and some numerical solutions of the two - body equations are presented for positronium and muonium - like systems , for various strengths of the coupling . 16.5 cm = -15 mm = 2 mm = 2 mm" ]
12,675
12,675
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: what is the most broad - ranging currently active field of applied probability ? measuring breadth by the number of different academic disciplines where it appears , it seems hard to beat a field appearing in physics , computer science and electrical engineering , economics and finance , psychology and sociology , population genetics and epidemiology and ecology . curiously , the field has no good name , though readers of _ bernoulli _ will most likely know it , under the continuing influence of liggett s 1985 book @xcite , as _ interacting particle systems_. it turns out that mathematically similar toy models of different real - world entities have been repeatedly re - invented in the different disciplines mentioned above , and literally thousands of papers have been written since 2000 on discipline - dependent variant models intended as more realistic . rather than attempting a brief overview of the whole field as it stands today ( on which i am certainly not an expert ) , let me take an opposite approach , imagining starting with a blank slate . i will set out in the next section a particular conceptual setting what sorts of things are we trying to model ? then a particular technical setup , and then indicate what sort of mathematical results one might seek . given this manifesto , the rest of the article describes some basic models , gives pointers to the existing literature and presents a few open problems suggested by our setting . the article is based on a short course given in summer 2012 at warwick and cornell , and more extensive informal material is available at @xcite . i must emphasize that the article is intended as an introduction to the topics it mentions , not as an authoritative survey , which would require ten times the length ! in particular none of the mathematics outlined here is both new and non - straightforward , except perhaps some open problems . the particular setting we envisage is of the human social network . people meet or communicate , and explicitly or implicitly receive information from the other , and this interaction may change the `` state '' ( opinion or possessions or ) of the individuals . now that sentence skips over many issues . `` information '' is a complicated concept @xcite , and formalizing it as one of a set of prespecified states hardly captures the nuances of human experience . and obviously we receive information in many ways other than one - on - one interaction with other individuals . but the fact that humans do a lot of different things via interactions emphasizes the point that we are interested in a variety of different rules , a point that would be less visible if we took some real or hypothetical physical system as a prototype setting . social networks ( whose mathematical modeling and analysis long predates the facebook era ) are usually modeled as unweighted graphs vertices are individuals , edges indicate some specified relationship . in most contexts it would be more realistic to use _ weighted _ graphs , the weight indicating strength of relationship . this is seldom done because of increased model complexity and the fact that the meaning of `` strength of relationship '' is context - dependent . but we will give it the specific meaning of `` frequency of meeting '' , formalized via the rates @xmath0 below . the story above suggests the following technical framework , in which randomness arises primarily via assumed random times of meetings . because the framework can be used outside the social network setting , i will use the impersonal word `` agent '' in what follows . consider @xmath1 _ agents _ and a nonnegative array @xmath2 , indexed by unordered pairs @xmath3 , which is irreducible ( i.e. , the graph of edges corresponding to strictly positive entries is connected ) . assume * each unordered pair @xmath4 of agents with @xmath5 meets at the times of a rate-@xmath0 poisson process , independent for different pairs . call this collection of poisson processes the _ meeting process_. where needed we write @xmath6 for the set of agents . now introduce a set @xmath7 of states , and consider a process @xmath8 in which each agent @xmath9 is in some state @xmath10 at time @xmath11 , and the state can only change when agent @xmath9 meets some other agent @xmath12 , at which time the two agents states are updated according to some rule ( typically deterministic , but might be random ) which depends only on the pre - meeting states @xmath13 . so in the deterministic case , there is a given arbitrary function @xmath14 and when agents in states @xmath15 and @xmath16 meet their states are updated as @xmath17 we call such a process an _ fmie ( finite markov information exchange ) process _ and emphasize that a specific such process has two levels . the meeting process is determined by the meeting rate matrix @xmath2 ( which we loosely call the `` geometry '' , imagining that we tend to meet more frequently with individuals who are `` close '' in some sense ) . the information update process is determined by some rule . then the different named fmie models we shall describe ( such as the voter model ) correspond to different rules for the informational superstructure ; we regard such models as defined over arbitrary geometries . of course much of the beauty and utility of mathematics is in providing abstractions that encompass apparently different things , and as stated at the start fmie models have been used in many disciplines . let me briefly mention three that are relevant to our models later . conceptually closest is the mathematical modeling of epidemics , whose long history is indicated by the 1957 monograph @xcite . a typical classical model like the sir ( susceptible infected recovered ) model corresponds to a 3-state fmie if the relevant distributions are exponential . here of course the vertices are people or animals and the edges relate to physical proximity . classical models considered homogeneously mixing populations ( i.e. , the complete graph geometry ) but there is extensive post-2000 literature on more general geometries . a quite different context , from theoretical computer science , concerns distributed randomized algorithms . here agents are processors , communicating with nearby ( direct connections in a network ) processors , and performing computations based on data transferred . see @xcite for the particular topic of _ gossip algorithms_. what are called _ interacting particle systems ( ips ) _ arose historically as statistical physics models of phenomena such as magnetism , and mathematicians became interested in particular in rigorous study of phase transitions , in the setting of infinite geometries , specifically the infinite @xmath18-dimensional lattice . this literature long ago branched out to study many `` toy models '' not so directly related to any specific physical phenomenon . our development is in the same `` toy models '' spirit , and the models naturally suggested by the social networks context partly overlap and partly differ from those naturally suggested by statistical physics . in particular , the abstraction of what we are studying as `` information flow through networks '' seems more helpful than any physical visualization . a broader but less focused view of the whole `` statistical physics of social dynamics '' topic can be found in @xcite . the concept of an _ ips _ is generally discussed via example rather than explicit definition . for instance liggett @xcite takes as examples the voter model , contact process , exclusion process , glauber dynamics for the ising model , and the potlatch process . our mathematical setup of _ fmie process _ in section [ sec : tech ] is intended as a more precisely circumscribed class of processes to study . for instance , only the first three processes on liggett s list are fmie ( for the contact process , add an artificial agent with rate - one meetings with each other agent , to effect recovery ) . what we call the meeting process is often called the _ graphical representation _ in ips . our emphasis on a _ finite _ number of agents gives a somewhat different perspective than in classical ips , in which the finite setting was considered only occasionally , e.g. , @xcite . our viewpoint is by analogy with the modern literature on mixing and hitting times for finite markov chains @xcite ; study how the behavior of a model depends on the underlying geometry , where `` behavior '' means quantitative aspects of finite - time behavior . more precisely , we typically study @xmath19 limits in a family of finite - agent processes , rather than @xmath20 limits in a single infinite - agent process . the averaging process studied in section [ sec : ave ] provides a prototype for the style of results we would like to establish for a given fmie model ; see also the discussion of possible @xmath20 limits in section [ sec : scc ] . the fmie setup allows an arbitrary update function @xmath21 at ( [ def - f ] ) and an arbitrary `` geometry '' of meeting rates @xmath2 . one can hardly hope to say anything of substance in this generality ( we will mention various `` general principles '' but these are rather trite , once said ) . at a pragmatic level , if seeking analytic results one chooses an update function such that the fmie process can be analyzed on the complete graph ( `` mean - field '' , roughly ) geometry , otherwise it will likely be difficult to handle other geometries . and obversely , one chooses a geometry in which one can analyze the two basic processes of section [ sec:2basic ] , otherwise it will likely be difficult to handle more complicated update rules . from our viewpoint , much of the literature since 2000 consists of inventing and investigating a large number of increasingly elaborate update rules , while considering only a small number of `` standard geometries '' , indicated below . keep in mind that it is easy to invent and simulate models , but hard to give rigorous proofs or to relate convincingly to real - world data . here we briefly describe four of the `` standard geometries '' on which models are often studied . recall @xmath1 is the number of agents . note that in a realistic social network there is no reason why @xmath22 , which is the rate at which agent @xmath9 meets other agents , should be constant in @xmath9 . but many simple models do have this property , in which case we may rescale time to fit a _ standardization convention _ @xmath23 as in the first two examples below . here @xmath24 . here @xmath25 for adjacent agents @xmath26 . the next two examples involve networks modelled as _ random _ graphs . formally this adds another level of randomness , though informally we can just think of being given a typical realization . in such ( non - regular ) graphs one typically can not satisfy ( [ standardization ] ) and instead the default convention is to take rates @xmath27 for each edge @xmath28 . here one starts with the @xmath18-dimensional discrete torus ( or similar non - random graph ) and then adds random other edges in some specified way , for instance independently with probabilities proportional to @xmath29 . there are several ways ( in particular the _ configuration model _ @xcite ) to define graphs corresponding to the intuitive notion of being `` completely random '' subject to the constraint that , as @xmath19 , the distribution of vertex - degrees converges to a prescribed distribution . such models are tractable because their @xmath19 local weak limit is just a modified galton - watson tree . there is a huge `` complex networks '' literature ( see , e.g. , the monographs @xcite ) devoted to inventing and studying network models , and i will not write out a long list here . let me instead mention three other mathematically natural geometries which have _ not _ been studied as much as one might have expected ( and two more will be mentioned in section [ sec : infinite ] ) . start with the torus @xmath30 and add rates @xmath31 for non - adjacent @xmath4 . this is a way to interpolate between the torus and the complete graph . note the distinction between this and the `` small worlds '' model , in which the rate is non - vanishing for a few random edges . given a model whose behavior is understood on the two - dimensional lattice , one could investigate the effect of `` disorder '' by taking instead a proximity graph over a poisson process of points in the plane @xcite . this is a standard example in markov chain theory . here we discuss two fmie processes that are `` basic '' in two senses . they fit the definition of fmie process but are much simpler than ( and therefore unrepresentative of ) a typical fmie process ; yet many other fmie processes can be regarded as being built over one of these base processes , with extra structure added . for each fmie , we give only a verbal description , which the reader can readily formalize . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ there is one token . when the agent @xmath9 holding the token meets another agent @xmath12 , the token is passed to @xmath12 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this can evidently be viewed as a 2-state fmie process . the natural aspect to study is @xmath32 the agent holding the token at time @xmath11 . this @xmath33 is the ( continuous - time ) markov chain with transition rates @xmath2 . we call this the _ associated _ markov chain associated with the underlying geometry . let me digress to mention , by analogy , a nuance . a google scholar search on `` exact phrase @xmath34 galton - watson ; year @xmath34 19651969 '' returns only papers studying @xmath35 population size in generation @xmath36 of a galton - watson branching process . changing to `` year @xmath34 20052009 '' , half the papers talk about the galton - watson * tree * , which of course has more structure than the population size process one can study cousins , for instance . analogously , the token process has more structure than the associated markov chain one can study the time until agent @xmath9 meets someone who has previously held the token , for instance . for finite - state markov chains , we have available both a classical general theory and a long catalog of explicit calculations in specific geometries . for our purposes , the main point is that several fmie models ( classically the voter model and the exclusion process , but also the averaging process ) have close connections with the associated markov chain , and parts of the `` standard modern theory '' @xcite of finite chains can be used in their analysis . for readers more familiar with discrete - time chains , let me emphasize that ( because @xmath37 ) the stationary distribution of the associated chain is always uniform ; this does not assume the standardization ( [ standardization ] ) . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ initially one agent is infected . whenever an infected agent meets another agent , the other agent becomes infected . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ in classical language , this is the si epidemic with @xmath38 distributions for infection times . but again there is a nuance . suppose that on each undirected edge @xmath28 of the geometry we put a single @xmath38 r.v . @xmath39 , independent over edges , and regard @xmath39 as the length of the edge . then there is an induced distance ( @xmath34 minimum route length ) between any pair of agents . this model of random distances is what i will call the _ first passage percolation ( fpp ) _ model . note this differs from classical lattice fpp , which assumes i.i.d . variables with arbitrary distribution . here is the nuance . in the pandemic process started with agent @xmath9 , write @xmath40 for the time when agent @xmath12 is infected . in the fpp process write @xmath41 for the distance between @xmath9 and @xmath12 . from the memoryless property of the exponential , we see that @xmath42 and indeed that @xmath43 for each @xmath9 . but pandemic and fpp are different processes in that @xmath44 whereas we have only @xmath45 . ( one can fix this particular issue by re - interpreting , in fpp , the time @xmath39 as the elapsed time , after one end is infected , until the other end is infected , but this misses the overall point that the distributions of the whole arrays @xmath46 are different . ) the pandemic model is `` basic '' in a very specific sense , in that it exhibits the fastest possible spread of information in any fmie model . that is , in an arbitrary fmie process @xmath8 over a given geometry , the value of @xmath47 can only be influenced by the value of @xmath48 if @xmath49 . here of course we are exploiting the natural coupling of two arbitrary fmie processes over the same geometry , which simply uses the same realization of the meeting process . albeit obvious , one can view this as an instance of the following . it is often useful to consider the natural coupling of two fmie processes . models of real - world epidemics are of course much more elaborate . regarding our simple pandemic model , it is analogous to the markov chain in two ways : * there is extensive literature doing calculations in specific geometries ; i show a little in section [ sec : pandemic ] . * several other fmies can be `` built over '' the pandemic model see section [ sec : built_over_p ] . but it differs it that there seems no existing `` general theory '' . see a conjecture in section [ sec : wlln ] . in these remarks , we are envisaging the finite - state case . time - asymptotics for fixed @xmath1 are not the issue ; in most models it s easy to see what s going on . informally there are four qualitatively different possible time - asymptotic behaviors , and each of the models we treat fits readily into one of these . * absorption in a random one ( of a small number of ) `` ordered '' configurations . [ pandemic , averaging , voter , deference ] . * absorption in a random one ( of a large number of ) `` disordered '' configurations . [ compulsive gambler ] . * * convergence to the unique stationary distribution ( perhaps on a subset of configurations ) . [ token , interchange , fashionista ] . the elided third item is the most general possibility for a finite - state markov chain ( applied to the configurations of a fmie process ) ; there are one or more _ strongly connected components _ ( sccs ) of the directed transition graph , and the limit distribution is a mixture over the stationary distributions on each scc . while it s easy to invent artificial fmie models with this behavior , i do nt know any `` natural '' such model . the following question is less easy that it first appears . the natural conjecture ( involving subsets of @xmath6 closed under @xmath21 , and functions whose sum is conserved by the interaction ) is false . consider the fmie process over the complete graph on @xmath1 agents ( for large @xmath1 ) defined by a deterministic update function @xmath21 as at ( [ def - f ] ) , what are the sccs of the fmie process ? as a prototype fmie model for which one can say something quantitative about its behavior over a general geometry we take the following . curiously , though it appears as an ingredient in more elaborate models , the only place i have seen the basic process itself is in the `` gossip algorithms '' literature @xcite which derives a version of the `` global bound '' , proposition [ pgcon ] . a careful treatment of the results below is written out in @xcite here i give a compressed version . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ initially each agent has some ( real - valued ) amount of money . whenever two agents meet , they divide their money equally . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ it is rather obvious that the individual values @xmath10 converge as @xmath50 to the average of initial values , so what is there to say ? write @xmath51 for the initial configuration @xmath52 , that is agent @xmath9 has unit money and other agents have none , and write @xmath53 for the transition probabilities of the associated markov chain . [ l1 ] for the averaging process with initial configuration @xmath51 we have @xmath54 . more generally , from any deterministic initial configuration @xmath55 , the expectations @xmath56 evolve exactly as the dynamical system @xmath57 where @xmath58 is the generator of the associated markov chain . the key point behind this results is that we can rephrase the dynamics of the averaging process as @xmath59 in informal language , this implies that the motion of a random penny which at a meeting of its owner agent is given to the other agent with probability @xmath60 is as the associated markov chain at half speed , that is with transition rates @xmath61 . to continue , we need to recall some background facts ( e.g. , @xcite , chap . 3 ) about reversible chains , here specialized to our continuous - time setting of the associated markov chain , that is with uniform stationary distribution ( @xmath37 ) . a function @xmath62 has ( with respect to the uniform distribution ) average @xmath63 , variance @xmath64 and @xmath65 norm @xmath66 defined by @xmath67 the @xmath65 norm will be used in several different ways . for a possible time-@xmath11 configuration @xmath68 of the averaging process , the quantity @xmath69 is a number , and so the quantity @xmath70 appearing in the proposition below is a random variable . the _ dirichlet form _ of the associated markov chain is @xmath71 where @xmath72 indicates summation over _ unordered _ pairs . the spectral gap of the chain , defined as the gap between eigenvalue @xmath73 and the second eigenvalue of @xmath58 , is characterized as @xmath74 the proof of the following result uses only the ingredients above and the averaging process dynamics . [ pgcon ] from an initial configuration @xmath75 with average zero , the time-@xmath11 configuration @xmath8 of the averaging process satisfies @xmath76 where @xmath77 is the spectral gap of the associated mc . to introduce the next result , thinking heuristically of the agents who agent @xmath9 most frequently meets as the `` local '' agents for @xmath9 , it is natural to guess that the configuration of the averaging process might become `` locally smooth '' faster than the `` global smoothness '' rate implied by proposition [ pgcon ] . in this context we may regard the dirichlet form @xmath78 as measuring the `` local smoothness '' , more accurately the local roughness , of a function @xmath79 , relative to the local structure of the particular meeting process . the next result implicitly bounds @xmath80 at finite times by giving an explicit bound for the integral over @xmath81 . note that , from the fact that the spectral gap is strictly positive , we can see directly that @xmath82 exponentially fast as @xmath20 ; proposition [ p - smooth ] is a complementary non - asymptotic result . [ p - smooth ] for the averaging process with arbitrary initial configuration @xmath83 , @xmath84 this looks slightly magical because the identity does not depend on the particular rate matrix @xmath58 , but of course the definition of @xmath85 involves @xmath58 . the next result illustrates the following . notions of _ duality _ are one of the interesting and useful tools in classical ips , and equally so in the social dynamics models we are studying . there is a formal definition of duality in @xcite , section 2.3 , but we find the concept easier to understand via examples . the duality between the voter model and coalescing chains ( recalled in section [ vmdual ] ) is the simplest and most striking example . the relationship we give in proposition [ p : adual ] for the averaging model is perhaps more representative of the general style of duality relationships . we repeat the `` random penny '' argument used in proposition [ l1 ] . now there are two pennies , and at any meeting there are independent decisions to hold or pass each penny . analyzing how the two pennies move leads to a certain coupling ( @xcite , sec . 2.4 ) of two ( half - speed ) associated markov chains @xmath86 the motion of the two pennies is coupled because , at a meeting of their two owners , one or both may be passed . the coupled process has the following relationship with the averaging process . [ p : adual ] for the averaging model @xmath8 started from a configuration @xmath83 which is a probability distribution over agents , and for each @xmath11 , @xmath87 where @xmath86 denotes the coupled process started from random agents @xmath88 chosen independently from @xmath83 . on a simple geometry where one can calculate @xmath89 via proposition [ l1 ] , one could seek to use proposition [ p : adual ] to investigate second - order properties of the averaging process , and some open problems of this type are mentioned in @xcite . finally , parallel to proposition [ pgcon ] which builds upon a standard @xmath65 bound for reversible markov chains is the following result @xcite , inspired by the theory surrounding log - sobolev inequalities @xcite . for a configuration @xmath90 which is a probability distribution write @xmath91 for the entropy of the configuration . consider the averaging process where the initial configuration is a probability distribution . by concavity of the function @xmath92 it is clear that in the averaging process @xmath93 can only increase , and hence @xmath94 a.s . ( recall @xmath95 is the entropy of the uniform distribution ) . [ pentropy ] for the averaging process whose initial configuration is a probability distribution @xmath83 , @xmath96 where @xmath97 is the log - sobolev constant of the associated markov chain . this model has a random update rule , most elegantly implemented via a `` directed '' convention in the meeting model : when agents @xmath4 meet , choose a ( uniform ) random direction and indicate it using an arrow @xmath98 or @xmath99 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ initially each agent has a different `` opinion '' agent @xmath9 has opinion @xmath9 . when @xmath9 and @xmath12 meet at time @xmath11 with direction @xmath98 , then agent @xmath12 adopts the current opinion of agent @xmath9 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ this model and many variants have acquired a substantial literature in the finite setting ( as well as the classical infinite lattice setting ) so what s written here is far from complete . in the classical setting , one traditionally assumed only two different initial opinions . in our finite - agent case , it seems more natural to take the initial opinions to be all different . for notation , write @xmath100 so @xmath101 is a random partition of @xmath6 . note that @xmath102 may be empty , or may be non - empty but not contain @xmath9 . the number of different remaining opinions can only decrease with time . ultimately the process must be absorbed in one of the @xmath1 `` everyone has same opinion '' configurations . this fits one of our section [ sec : scc ] general possibilities for a fmie process : absorption in a random one ( of a small number of ) `` ordered '' configurations . a natural quantity of interest is this * consensus time * @xmath103 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ initially each agent has a token agent @xmath9 has token @xmath9 . at time @xmath11 each agent @xmath9 has a ( maybe empty ) collection ( cluster ) @xmath104 of tokens . when @xmath9 and @xmath12 meet at time @xmath11 with direction @xmath98 , then agent @xmath9 gives his tokens to agent @xmath12 ; that is , @xmath105 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ so @xmath106 is a random partition of @xmath6 . a natural quantity of interest is the * coalescence time * @xmath107 regarding each non - empty cluster as a particle , the particles move as the associated markov chain at half - speed ( rates @xmath61 ) , moving independently until two particles meet and thereby coalesce . note this factor @xmath60 in this section . for fixed @xmath11 , @xmath108 . in particular @xmath109 . it is important to realize that they are different as processes . for fixed @xmath9 , note that @xmath110 can only change by @xmath111 , but @xmath112 jumps to and from @xmath73 . the proof in the classical lattice setting @xcite ( which refers to coalescing _ random walks _ extends unchanged to our setting of general symmetric rates @xmath2 . one simply considers a realization of the ( directed ) meeting process on a fixed time interval @xmath113 $ ] , uses this to construct the coalescing chains process at time @xmath11 , then observes that reversing the direction of time and the arrows gives a construction of the voter model at time @xmath11 . almost all of the literature on the finite voter model has focussed on estimating @xmath109 in terms of the geometry , and i will show some of this work in sections [ sec : vmcg][sec : king2 ] . but there are other questions one can ask about the finite - time behavior , to be mentioned in section [ sec : pre - asy ] . there are two ways to analyze @xmath114 on the complete graph , both providing some bounds on other geometries . the first uses coalescing chains . one aspect of * kingman s coalescent * @xcite is the continuous - time mc on states @xmath115 with standardized rates @xmath116 . for that chain , the mean hitting time to state @xmath117 is @xmath118 and in particular @xmath119 . now when we consider coalescing chains on the complete @xmath1-graph , the number of clusters evolves as the continuous - time mc on states @xmath120 with rates @xmath121 . so @xmath122 and in particular @xmath123 the second way is to consider the voter model directly , specifically the variant of the voter model with only 2 opinions . consider the number @xmath124 of agents with the first opinion . on the complete @xmath1-graph , @xmath124 evolves as the continuous - time mc on states @xmath125 with rates @xmath126 this process arises in classical applied probability ( e.g. , as the moran model in population genetics ) . we want to study the absorption time @xmath127 by general birth - and - death formulas , or by comparison with simple rw , @xmath128 this is maximized by @xmath129 , and @xmath130 now we can couple the original voter model ( @xmath1 different initial opinions ) with the variant with only 2 opinions , initially held by @xmath131 and @xmath132 agents . ( just randomly assign these two opinions , initially . ) from this coupling , we see @xmath133 where the fraction is the chance that two specified agents are assigned different opinions , initially . in particular , the latter with @xmath129 implies @xmath134 comparing with the correct asymptotics ( [ voter - kn ] ) , we see that although constant is not precise , the order of magnitude is correct . consider a general geometry @xmath2 , and write @xmath135 . suppose the flow rates satisfy , for some constant @xmath136 , @xmath137 the right side is normalized so that on the complete graph this holds with @xmath138 . we can repeat the analysis above the process @xmath124 now moves at least @xmath139 times as fast as on the complete graph , and so @xmath140 this style of argument can be used for many fmie processes . bottleneck statistics give crude general bounds . often the speed at which the asymptotic behavior sets in depends on some quantification of the connectivity of the geometry . if for some @xmath141 the quantity @xmath142 is small , it indicates a possible `` bottleneck '' subset of size @xmath141 . it is convenient to combine the family @xmath143 into a single statistic , but the appropriate way to do this is ( fmie ) model - dependent . in the voter model case above , we used @xmath144 quantities like @xmath139 are descriptive statistics of a weighted graph , often given names like `` isoperimetric constants '' , but `` bottleneck statistics '' seems a more informative name . the best known use of bottleneck statistics is cheeger s inequality ( which bounds the spectral gap of a markov chain in terms of @xmath139 ) and its generalizations using other bottleneck statistics see @xcite for an detailed treatment . such techniques are used extensively in the theory of algorithms , where @xmath139 is called _ conductance _ see , e.g. , @xcite for analysis of a gossip algorithm . estimating @xmath145 is clearly related to study of the _ meeting time _ @xmath146 of two independent copies of the chain started at @xmath9 and @xmath12 , a topic that arises in other contexts . recall that on the complete graph the mean coalescence time is asymptotically twice the mean meeting time . also note that under enough symmetry ( e.g. , continuous - time random walk on the discrete torus ) the relative displacement between the two copies evolves as the same random walk run at twice the speed , and study of @xmath146 reduces to study of @xmath147 . all this suggests there is a close connection between the coalescence time and hitting times for the associated chain . the following result was conjectured long ago but only recently proved . for any chain , define a statistic @xmath148 [ t_oliveira ] there exist numerical constants @xmath149 such that , for any finite irreducible reversible markov chain , @xmath150 the proof involves intricate analysis that i will not try to outline here . if the stationary distribution @xmath151 contains exponentially rare states then the theorem is uninformative . but in our setting of fmie processes , the associated chain always has _ uniform _ stationary distribution . one can create examples of geometries in which the bound is not the correct order of magnitude , but i suspect that in any `` natural '' geometry theorem [ t_oliveira ] does give the correct order . a different style of general result given recently in @xcite shows that on a regular graph @xmath152 where @xmath77 is the spectral gap of the associated mc . but this bound is of correct order only for expander - like graphs . return to the setting of section [ vmdual ] chains are associated chains run at half speed . write @xmath153 for the mean meeting time from independent uniform starts . in a sequence of chains with @xmath19 , impose a condition such as the following . for each @xmath154 @xmath155 assuming ( [ vmau ] ) , under what further conditions can one prove @xmath156 that such a result is anticipated has been folklore since 1989 , when cox @xcite proved ( [ opkingman ] ) for the torus @xmath157^d$ ] in dimension @xmath158 . ( in that geometry , @xmath159 for @xmath160 , where @xmath161 is the mean number of visits of standard random walk on @xmath162 to the origin . ) see @xcite for a physicist s view . one could try to prove this in two stages . * stage 1 . * for fixed @xmath141 , show that the mean time for @xmath141 initially independent uniform walkers to coalesce should be @xmath163 . * stage 2 . * show that for @xmath164 slowly , the time for the initial @xmath1 walkers to coalesce into @xmath165 clusters is @xmath166 . it is likely that stage 1 can be proved without further assumptions , as follows . from old results on mixing times @xcite , condition ( [ vmau ] ) is enough to show that the variation distance mixing time @xmath167 . so as a prototype use of @xmath168 by considering time intervals of length @xmath169 , for @xmath170 , the events `` a particular pair of walkers meets in the next @xmath169-interval '' are approximately independent . this makes the `` number of clusters '' process behave ( to first order ) as the kingman coalescent as the number decreases from @xmath141 to @xmath117 . this approach is implemented in @xcite for @xmath171 , but it should hold for general geometries . on the other hand , stage 2 requires some different assumptions to control short - time behavior . see @xcite for a recent extensive study of this problem , and the current best results . as mentioned earlier , almost all of the literature on the finite voter model has focussed on estimating @xmath172 in terms of the geometry . but there are other aspects of finite - time behavior one might study , and we can uncover some such aspects by comparison with what we have studied in the averaging process . recall we start with all opinions different . if the proportions of agents with the various opinions are written as @xmath173 , the statistic @xmath174 is one measure of concentration versus diversity of opinion . this suggests studying @xmath175 . duality implies @xmath176 where @xmath177 is the meeting time for independent chains with uniform starts . one can study the distribution of @xmath177 in special geometries , and more generally can often apply the explicit exponential distribution approximation from @xcite , prop . * 2 . * a corresponding `` local '' measure of concentration versus diversity is the probability that agents @xmath178 chosen with probability @xmath179 ( `` random neighbors '' ) have same opinion at time @xmath11 . refinements of this `` clustering '' behavior have been studied in the classical two - dimensional lattice setting @xcite . * the diversity statistic @xmath174 emphasizes large clusters ( large time ) ; the statistic @xmath180 emphasizes small clusters ( small time ) . so one could consider @xmath181 this has apparently not been studied . certain special families of geometries have @xmath19 local weak limits ( which are infinite rooted random networks ) , and aspects of fmie models on the finite geometries can often be related to the behavior of the model on the infinite geometry.=1 two familiar examples of such geometries are for the torus @xmath30 , the @xmath182 limit is the infinite lattice @xmath162 ; for the `` random graphs with prescribed degree distribution '' geometry , the limit is a galton - watson tree with a size - biased offspring distribution after the first generation ; and two less familiar examples are for the complete graph with random edge - weights , the limit is the pwit @xcite , an infinite - degree tree where the weights on the edges at a given vertex form a rate-@xmath117 poisson process on @xmath183 ; a more elaborate graph @xcite built over ( iii ) , designed to have a @xmath19 local weak limit which is more complex ( not just a tree ) yet still fairly tractable . the relation between finite and infinite geometries is simplest for the `` epidemic '' ( fpp ) type models later , but also can be used for markov chain related models , starting from the following . for a large finite - state markov chain whose behavior near a state @xmath9 can be approximated be a transient infinite - state chain , we have @xmath184 where @xmath185 is defined in terms of the approximating infinite - state chain as @xmath186 . the approximation ( an instance of the poisson clumping heristic @xcite ) comes from the finite - state mean hitting time formula ( @xcite , lemma 2.11 ) via a `` interchange of limits '' procedure which requires ad hoc justification . in the context of the voter model , if there is a local weak limit of the finitie geometries , the local transience principle implies that the property @xmath187 is essentially equivalent to transience of the chain on the limit infinite geometry . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ initially each agent has some ( nonnegative real - valued ) amount of money . whenever two agents meet , they instantly play a fair game in which one agent acquires the combined money . in other words , if one has @xmath188 and the other has @xmath189 then the first acquires all @xmath190 with chance @xmath191 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ note that on the complete graph geometry , this process is just an augmentation of the kingman coalescent process . on a general geometry , a configuration in which the set of agents with non - zero money forms an `` independent set '' ( no two are adjacent in the weighted graph ) is obviously an absorbing configuration , and conversely . this process has apparently not been studied . i mention it because it provides a simple example of the `` disordered '' limit behavior mentioned in section [ sec : scc ] . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ initially each agent has a different token . when two agents meet , they exchange tokens . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i will call this the interchange process ; the `` two type '' version is the classical exclusion process . though this model is not particularly natural in the social networks context , the result below ( which established a longstanding conjecture ) illustrates a result for which our general `` weighted graphs '' setting is the ( mathematically ) correct setting . the motion of an individual token is as the associated markov chain , so has some spectral gap @xmath192 . the whole interchange process is itself a reversible markov chain , so has a spectral gap @xmath193 which by a general `` contraction '' fact ( @xcite , sec . 4.6.1 ) satisfies @xmath194 . for every geometry we have @xmath196 . the proof involves intricate analysis that i will not try to outline here . recall the discussion in section [ sec : pan ] . for the purposes of this section , the pandemic process is the same as the fpp process ; we will use the language of `` infectives '' and `` time '' ( rather than `` percolation distance '' ) and write @xmath197 for the time taken for an epidemic started at @xmath9 to reach @xmath12 . in this section , we will recall the well - understood behaviors on the lattice ( section [ sec : fpp_torus ] ) and the complete graph ( section [ sec : fpp_complete ] ) . each type of behavior raises questions about the extent to which similar behavior remains true in more general geometries ( sections [ sec : wlln ] and [ sec : fpp_other ] ) which have not been systematically studied . we quote the classical result for fpp on the infinite lattice , with brief remarks . consider the fpp process on the edges of @xmath162 with @xmath198 edge - lengths , starting from the origin . write @xmath199 for the infected set at time @xmath11 , and @xmath200 for its fattening ( replace each point by a cube of side @xmath117 ) . there is a non - random closed convex set @xmath201 such that , for each @xmath202 , @xmath203 * the key proof ingredient is the _ subadditive ergodic theorem_. * the result hold for more general iid edge - times . * @xmath204 is _ not _ the unit ball in euclidean norm . * for later use write @xmath205 for the ( @xmath18-dimensional ) `` volume '' of @xmath204 . * understanding the asymptotic variance of @xmath41 is a famous hard problem ; see , e.g. , @xcite . consider now the fpp process on the discrete torus @xmath30 . we use our standardization convention ( [ standardization ] ) , so that rates @xmath25 for each edge @xmath28 . the following three `` first - order '' results are immediate from the shape theorem . asymptotics are as @xmath182 for fixed @xmath18 . @xmath206 the same holds ( in @xmath207 ) for @xmath208 itself . second , the time @xmath209 until all agents are infected satisfies @xmath210 for a constant @xmath211 defined in terms of the shape of @xmath204 . third , the proportion @xmath212 of infected agents satisfies @xmath213 for a certain function @xmath214 defined in terms of the shape of @xmath204 . having a limit `` shape '' represented by @xmath204 is very special to the lattice setting . what about the general setting of rates @xmath2 ? suppose we have a result of the kind @xmath215 then the random set @xmath216 of infectives at @xmath11 from initial @xmath9 is approximately the deterministic set @xmath217 . so , if the essence of a `` shape theorem '' is a deterministic approximation to the infected set , it is essentially just a wlln ( weak law of large numbers ) . a precise conjecture is formulated below . everything depends on @xmath1 ( not written ) and limits are as @xmath19 . the conclusion we want is @xmath218 we work in the fpp model , writing @xmath219 for the time to traverse edge @xmath220 . the obvious obstacle to the desired conclusion is that there may be a set @xmath221 ( with @xmath222 ) such that , in the random percolation path @xmath223 , the time taken to traverse the edge @xmath224 is not @xmath225 . one could conjecture this is the only obstacle ; here is a slightly weaker conjecture . [ conj-1 ] with arbitrary rates @xmath2 , if @xmath226 then ( [ conj-1 ] ) holds . it is intuitively clear ( and not hard to prove ) that condition ( [ tconc ] ) is necessary . proving the conjecture would hardly be a definitive result ( because condition ( [ tconc ] ) is not a condition directly on @xmath227 but would represent a start on understanding when the wlln holds . here we have rates @xmath228 and we start with one infective . this is a fundamental stochastic process whose basic properties have been rediscovered many times from different viewpoints , but there seems no authoritative survey . our focus is on the randomly - shifted logistic limit result , proposition [ plogistic ] . we give an outline taken from @xcite ( a similar treatment is in @xcite ) , though essentially the same result can be found in older genetics literature . there are two reasons for this particular focus . from this one result , we can read off many results like ( [ dgg ] , [ dgl ] ) , a fact which has not been appreciated in the combinatorics - inspired literature . and secondly , it plays a central role is investigating fmie processes build over pandemic , as we shall see in section [ sec : built_over_p ] . write @xmath229 time at which @xmath131 people are infected . the observation @xmath230 is a basic starting place for analysis . for instance , the time @xmath231 until the whole population is infected is just @xmath232 , and so @xmath233 and the time @xmath234 until a random person ( amongst the @xmath235 initially uninfected ) is infected is @xmath236 this analysis can be pursued to get distributional results , but let us first look at different methods that indicate the behavior without extensive calculation . the idea is to analyze separately the _ initial phase _ when @xmath237 people are infected , and the _ pandemic phase _ when @xmath238 people are infected . the `` deterministic , continuous '' analog of our `` stochastic , discrete '' model of an epidemic is the _ logistic equation _ @xmath239 for the proportion @xmath240 of a population infected at time @xmath11 . a solution is a shift of the basic solution @xmath241 setting @xmath242 for the number of individuals infected in our stochastic process , then scaling to the proportion @xmath243 , we find @xmath244 by including variance estimates , one could prove the following formalization of the idea that , during the pandemic phase , @xmath245 behaves as @xmath240 to first order . precisely , for fixed @xmath246 and @xmath247 we have ( in probability ) @xmath248 that is , we `` start the clock '' when a proportion @xmath246 of the population is infected . this can now be reformulated more cleanly in terms of the time @xmath249 at which half the population is infected : @xmath250 for later use , consider the times at which each process equals @xmath251 , where @xmath252 slowly . we find @xmath253 which rearranges to @xmath254 now turn to the initial phase of the epidemic . on a fixed initial time interval @xmath255 $ ] , the process @xmath242 of number of infectives converges in distribution to the process @xmath256 for which the times @xmath257 satisfy @xmath258 and this is the classic _ yule process _ , for which it is well known that @xmath259 now calculate informally , for @xmath260 , @xmath261 in other words @xmath262 where @xmath263 has the gumbel distribution @xmath264 . comparing with ( [ dn7 ] ) gives ( [ gng ] ) below . [ plogistic ] for the simple epidemic process on the complete @xmath1-vertex graph , there exist random @xmath265 such that @xmath266 where @xmath21 is the logistic function and @xmath263 has gumbel distribution . one could prove this by formalizing the arguments above , but there is a more efficient though less illuminating way . the result is essentially equivalent to the assertion @xmath267 the basic observation ( [ knk ] ) allows one to write down an explicit expression for the fourier transform of the left side , and one just needs to work through the calculus to check it converges to the fourier transform of the right side . ( transform methods are of course very classical in applied probability , and their use in epidemic models goes back at least to @xcite . ) the same transform argument ( then taking a different limit regime ) can be used to prove the following result ( e.g. , @xcite ) for the time @xmath268 until the entire population is infected : @xmath269 where @xmath270 are independent with gumbel distribution . while not obvious from the statement of the proposition above , it can in fact be deduced as follows . from ( [ dnun ] ) , the time @xmath271 until half the population is infected satisfies @xmath272 then symmetry ( under @xmath273 ) of the transition rates ( [ knk ] ) implies that @xmath268 is essentially distributed as the sum of two independent copies of @xmath271 . reconsider the time @xmath274 until a random person is infected . proposition [ plogistic ] implies it has asymptotic distribution @xmath275 where @xmath276 has logistic distribution function , independent of the gumbel time - shift @xmath263 . so we expect @xmath277 now @xmath278 by symmetry ( @xmath279 ) and one can calculate ( or look up ) that @xmath280 euler s constant , so the limit theorem is consistent with the exact formula ( [ euler ] ) . the extent to which different aspects of the `` mean - field '' behavior in section [ sec : fpp_complete ] extend to more general geometries is not well understood . for the `` random graphs with prescribed degree distributions '' ( with appropriate moments finite ) geometry , one expects to see qualitatively similar behavior ( the pandemic phase to have duration @xmath281 , centered at time @xmath282 ) , and almost precise analogs have indeed been proved e.g. , @xcite , theorem 3.1(b ) gives the analog of ( [ dgl ] ) . there has been extensive subsequent work on related problems and related `` locally tree - like '' geometries , but these proofs are substantially more technical than for the complete graph . and even on the hamming cube @xmath283 the behavior of fpp is not well understood @xcite . to think about possible `` general theory '' , let me suggest a loose analogy with the established theory of random walk on infinite graphs @xcite . in that theory , most geometries fall into one of two categories , exemplified by @xmath162 and @xmath18-trees , according to whether @xmath284 properties involving spectral radius , isoperimetric inequalities , amenability , ( sub)linear rate of escape can then be related to this categorization . that theory formalizes a distinction ( informally , between `` finite dimensional '' and `` infinite dimensional '' ) from the random walk viewpoint . so by analogy , we have seen that the finite pandemic process behaves differently on @xmath30 and on the complete graph . can we select one specific aspect of the different behavior as a useful basis for classifying geometries ? write @xmath285 . one obvious distinction between these two geometries is that on @xmath30 the means @xmath286 vary ( depending on distance between @xmath9 and @xmath12 ) but on the complete graph , the @xmath286 are the same ( to first order ) for most pairs @xmath28 . so we can define a property ( for a sequence of weighted graphs @xmath2 ) which combines the idea of the wlln ( [ conj-1 ] ) with the idea of the @xmath286 not varying much : @xmath287 this property ( which holds for the `` random graphs with prescribed degree distribution '' geometry @xcite ) is an attempt to formalize the notion of a geometry being `` locally infinite - dimensional '' from the fpp viewpoint . study equivalences between this property and the `` geometry '' of @xmath2 . two brief comments . we ca nt hope to establish ( [ conj - infdim ] ) using only isoperimetric inequalities they can only give order of magnitude . there is a loose analogy with the cutoff phenomenon in finite markov chains @xcite , in that we expect the property to hold in `` highly symmetric '' geometries . but that analogy is discouraging in that there is no useful general condition for cut - off . consider the geometry @xmath58 with agents @xmath171 and meeting rates at rate @xmath117 an agent meets a uniform random neighbor ; at rate @xmath288 an agent meets a uniform non - neighbor . here over this range the geometry qualitatively interpolates between the complete - graph case and the nearest - neighbor lattice case . so we expect the center of the pandemic window to interpolate between orders @xmath290 and @xmath141 , and the width of the pandemic window to interpolate between orders @xmath117 and @xmath141 . for the pandemic model over this geometry , it turns out that an analog of the `` randomly - shifted logistic limit '' holds , albeit with a different deterministic function @xmath21 in place of the logistic , and different scaling . this is rather counter - intuitive we envisage infectives as growing patches of mold in a petri dish , one might expect the detailed geometry of overlaps to play a role . but the key qualitative property is that , during the pandemic phase , the new infectives arise from `` colonies '' started earlier in the pandemic phase , not in the initial phase . this enables us to derive the following equation for the standardized function @xmath21 describing proportion of infectives r over the pandemic window : @xmath291 see @xcite for heuristics and @xcite for careful treatment of a closely related model . there is a large literature modeling spread of opinions , adoption of innovations etc via social networks , and some of the models fit our fmie setting . instead of describing some standard model let me describe two new fmie models suggested by the `` social networks '' context . mathematically they are variants of pandemic , and we will see in sections [ sec : deference][sec : fashionista ] that on the complete graph their behavior can be derived from the precise understanding of pandemic given by proposition [ plogistic ] . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the agents are labelled @xmath117 through @xmath1 , and agent @xmath9 initially has opinion @xmath9 . when two agents meet , they adopt the same opinion , the smaller of the two opinion - labels . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ clearly opinion 1 spreads as pandemic , so the `` ultimate '' behavior of deference is not a new question . we will consider the complete graph geometry , and study @xmath292 , where @xmath293 is the proportion of the population with opinion @xmath131 at time @xmath11 . we can rewrite proposition [ plogistic ] as @xmath294 where @xmath21 is the logistic function and @xmath295 , where @xmath296 arises as the limit r.v . ( [ yule_lim ] ) associated with the yule process . the key insight is that opinions @xmath117 and @xmath297 and and @xmath131 combined behave as one infection in pandemic , except for a different initial phase , and so the sum @xmath298 behaves as in ( [ xkf ] ) but with a different random shift @xmath299 . because the initial phase is just a collection of @xmath131 independent yule processes , we see that the sum has a representation of format ( [ xkf ] ) with @xmath300 here the @xmath301 are i.i.d . @xmath198 . so the @xmath19 limit behavior of the deference model in the complete graph geometry is , over the pandemic phase , @xmath302 the deference model envisages agents as `` slaves to authority '' . here is a conceptually opposite `` slaves to fashion '' model , whose analysis is mathematically surprisingly similar . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ at the times of a rate-@xmath77 poisson process , a new fashion originates with a uniform random agent , and is time - stamped . when two agents meet , they each adopt the latest ( most recent time - stamp ) fashion . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ it is easy to see that , for the random partition of agents into `` same fashion '' , there is a stationary distribution . for the complete graph geometry , we can copy the analysis of the deference model . combining all the fashions appearing after a given time , these behave as one infection in pandemic ( over the pandemic window ; newly - originating fashions have negligible effect ) , hence their proportion behaves as a random time - shift of the logistic curve @xmath21 . so when we study the vector @xmath303 of proportions of agents adopting different fashions @xmath131 , we expect @xmath19 limit behavior of the form @xmath304 where @xmath305 are the points of some stationary process on @xmath306 . knowing this form for the @xmath19 asymptotics , we can again determine the distribution of @xmath307 by considering the initial stage of spread of a new fashion . it turns out that @xmath308 where @xmath309 are the times of a rate-@xmath77 poisson process on @xmath310 . the second expression makes it clear that @xmath307 is a stationary process . here is the outline argument for ( [ fash - limit ] ) . consider the recent fashions at time @xmath311 adopted by small but non - negligible proportions of the population . more precisely , consider fashions originating during the time interval @xmath312 $ ] , where @xmath313 slowly . for a fashion originating at time @xmath314 , the time-@xmath73 set of adopting agents will be a subset of the corresponding epidemic process , which we know has proportional size @xmath315 where @xmath316 has @xmath198 distribution . the times @xmath317 of origination of different fashions form by assumption a rate-@xmath77 poisson process , and after we impose i.i.d . shifts @xmath318 we note ( as an elementary property of poisson processes ) that the shifted points @xmath319 still form a rate-@xmath77 poisson process , say @xmath320 , on @xmath310 . so the sizes of small recent fashion groups ( that is letting @xmath321 ) , for which overlap between fashions becomes negligible , are approximately @xmath322 . summing over @xmath323 gives @xmath324 and we end up with the representation ( [ fash - limit ] ) . on the torus @xmath171 the stationary distribution of fashionista is qualitatively similar to the _ dead leaves model _ @xcite and , as outlined in @xcite , one can apply simple scaling arguments to analyze the diversity statistic @xmath325 and show @xmath326 the corresponding result on the complete graph is @xmath327 and ( [ fash - limit ] ) provides a ( complicated ) explicit expression for the right side . in particular , we can see the @xmath328 behavior is @xmath329 for constant @xmath330 . studying @xmath331 in general geometries is an * open topic * , which opens up other questions to study about short - term behavior of pandemic . there is a huge literature attempting more realistic epidemic models , which i will not try to outline here . the fmie - type model that has been most extensively studied in the mathematical literature is the contact process ( the sis model with exponential infection times ) , studied classically on @xmath162 @xcite . a nice survey , in the style of this article , of recent rigorous work on the contact process on preferential attachment , small worlds and power - law degree geometries can be found in @xcite , and the latest technical work in @xcite . the current form of conjecture [ conj-1 ] emerged from conversations with jian ding . and i thank an anonymous referee for many helpful expository suggestions . research supported by nsf grant dms-07 - 04159 . Abstract:
[ "the style of mathematical models known to probabilists as interacting particle systems and exemplified by the voter , exclusion and contact processes have found use in many academic disciplines . in many such disciplines the underlying conceptual picture is of a social network , where individuals meet pairwise and update their `` state '' ( opinion , activity etc ) in a way depending on the two previous states . this picture motivates a precise general setup we call _ finite markov information exchange ( fmie ) processes_. we briefly describe a few less familiar models ( averaging , compulsive gambler , deference , fashionista ) suggested by the social network picture , as well as a few familiar ones ." ]
14,654
14,654
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: an optical lattice is a crystal structure of off - resonant laser light , wherein atoms are trapped due to the optical dipole force . this creates a periodic potential in which the motional states of a single atom exhibits many of the usual textbook solid state characteristics , such as energy band structure , bloch oscillations and wannier - stark ladders @xcite . in an interacting many - body system the periodic potential constitutes an ideal setting for realizing a wide range of condensed matter phenomena such as the superfluid to mott insulator transition @xcite . likewise controlled atomic collisions in an optical lattice potential is a promising approach to implement quantum gate operations @xcite . in the context of ultracold atomic collisions a feshbach resonance arises , when a bound state of a closed scattering channel is coupled to the scattering continuum in the entrance channel @xcite . in an applied magnetic field the separated atoms are described by eigenstates of the hyperfine and zeeman - hamiltonian , and the coupling between the different channels is a result of the atomic interaction , which is not diagonal in the hyperfine basis . the position of the resonance is tunable by varying the strength of the applied magnetic field , since the open and closed channels have different magnetic moments , and therefore experience different zeeman shifts . when the closed channel bound state is tuned to be degenerate with the colliding atoms in the entrance channel the scattering cross section is resonantly enhanced . a feshbach resonance may thus be used to regulate the atomic interactions , which in the ultracold regime is characterized entirely by the @xmath0-wave scattering length . in addition , since the feshbach resonance provides an adiabatic connection between bound dimer states and the continuum , a pair of unbound atoms may be converted into a molecule by slowly ramping the magnetic field across the resonance position . to study two - particle physics on a lattice experimentally , a state with either zero or two atoms at each lattice site may be prepared by adiabatic magnetic field sweeps across a feshbach resonance starting from a pure atomic cloud @xcite . this prepares a state with at most two atoms in each lattice well , since sites with more than two atoms are eliminated by inelastic collisions . the unbound atoms may be subsequently removed by an optical purification pulse . the sample thus prepared contains only isolated pairs , whose binding can then be controlled by further adjustments of the magnetic field . a special situation arises in an optical lattice due to the band structure . the periodic potential leads to a structured continuum with scattering states grouped in energy bands separated by band gaps . the depth of the lattice controls the width of the bands and their mutual separation . in this paper we concentrate on the lowest band , where the band structure then implies that the continuum has both a lower and an upper edge . this has fundamental implications for both the bound states and the scattering states of the system . a counter - intuitive effect of the lattice band structure is the existence of bound pairs composed of atoms , which repel each other @xcite . such repulsively bound pairs exist , when the repulsive interaction is strong enough to lift the state of two atoms on the same lattice site out of the continuum and into the band gap , thereby preventing the pair from dissociating and making it a bound state of the system @xcite . in one dimension repulsively bound pairs exist for an arbitrarily small repulsion . near a feshbach resonance further intriguing two - body effects become possible . in particular , the feshbach resonance gives rise to motionally bound molecules , which are stable only at finite center of mass momentum with respect to the lattice , while decaying if at rest . it is thus possible to tune the location of the scattering resonance at a fixed magnetic field by controlling the molecular motion @xcite . here we derive analytical results fully characterizing both the bound and scattering states of an atom pair in an optical lattice near a feshbach resonance . we represent the lattice physics in a discrete model with nearest neighbor hopping . to describe the feshbach resonance we adopt a two - channel model with one open channel and one closed channel , which is adequate to describe the physics of both the scattering continuum and the bound states of the system for an isolated resonance @xcite . contrary to @xcite we include the background interaction in the entrance channel , which plays an important role both in scattering and in the bound state dynamics . the direct scattering process in the open channel interferes with the resonant scattering proceeding via the closed channel resonance state leading to a fano profile in the transmission probability . in the bound state spectrum the presence of an additional bound state leads to avoided crossings that are important when considering adiabatic transitions induced by ramping the magnetic field . the same fundamental physics of a discrete state embedded in a structured continuum occurs in the fano - anderson model , which describes autoionizing states in atoms @xcite and localized electron states in solids @xcite . from a many - body perspective the combination of an optical lattice with resonant control of the atomic interactions makes a variety of spin models attainable @xcite . in a previous paper @xcite we described the basic results of the discrete lattice model of the feshbach resonance physics , and suggested how the salient features of the system may be probed in experiments . here we present the full analytic theory of feshbach scattering in a one - dimensional lattice ( sec . [ sec : scattering ] ) . we introduce a generalized , one - dimensional scattering length , which is defined at both the upper and the lower threshold of the lowest continuum band in the lattice . this generalized scattering length shows a characteristic feshbach divergence when a bound state of the system crosses either band edge , and we identify the magnetic field positions for these divergences as a function of the lattice depth for a specific feshbach resonance . in sec . [ sec : bound - states ] we consider the bound state solutions of the combined lattice - feshbach problem and derive analytic expressions for the binding energies and the wavefunctions of the dimer states . we also show that the molecules exhibit cooperative tunneling with a tunneling rate consistent with that measured in experiments @xcite . a spectral analysis of the unbound and dimerized atom pair states is presented in sec . [ sec : spectral - analysis ] , where we demonstrate that threshold effects lead to a non - trivial peak structure of the molecular spectral function inside the band . our discrete lattice model includes only the lowest continuum band and neglects couplings to higher bands in the lattice . in sec . [ sec : validity ] we discuss when the lowest band approximation is valid and how this restriction may be relaxed . we find that a moderate interband coupling only modifies our results on a quantitative level . throughout we give quantitative results for a specific feshbach resonance for which our model is valid @xcite . we consider atoms with mass @xmath1 in a cubic optical lattice potential @xmath2 created by off - resonant laser light with wavelength @xmath3 . the lattice period is , @xmath4 , and the transverse , @xmath5 , and longitudinal depths , @xmath6 , are measured in units of the photon recoil energy , . for a cubic lattice the motion separates along the three spatial directions , and the hamiltonian , @xmath7 , is diagonalized by products of three bloch functions , @xmath8 , one for each spatial direction @xmath9 , where @xmath10 is the quasi - momentum in the range @xmath11 $ ] , and @xmath12 is the band index . the energy eigenstates form the usual band structure , splitting the continuum into bands separated by energy gaps that decrease with increasing @xmath12 . the band gaps grow and the widths of the bands decrease , as the lattice is made deeper by increasing the laser intensity . we will assume that the lattice depth along the transverse directions , @xmath5 , is much larger than the depth of the longitudinal lattice , @xmath6 . this allows us to only include the ground state along the two perpendicular directions , leaving an effectively one - dimensional lattice . as the scattering energy is increased consecutive transverse channels open , however we only consider scattering at energies much smaller than the transverse level splitting , thus justifying the neglect of the transverse degrees of freedom . a confinement induced resonance occurs at the lower edge of the continuum when the ( free space ) scattering length @xmath13 and the width of the transverse confining potential @xmath14 are related by @xmath15 @xcite . however , this resonance may be avoided by not choosing the transverse confinement too tight , and for the quantitative results we present here , it plays no role . the bloch waves are delocalized , but can be combined into orthonormal localized basis functions , wannier functions , which in the longitudinal direction take the form @xmath16 in addition to the band index they are labeled by a site index , @xmath17 , specifying at which lattice sites , @xmath18 , the wannier functions are localized . a similar wannier basis can be constructed in the two transverse directions . when it is not clear from the context , which wannier basis we refer to , we will add a superscript @xmath19 or @xmath20 to the wannier functions indicating to which lattice direction they belong . the dynamics of a single atom in the @xmath12th longitudinal band , _ i.e. _ the kinetic energy and lattice potential , is characterized by the tunneling amplitude , , between lattice sites separated by a distance @xmath21 . here @xmath22 only depends on the coordinate along the weak lattice direction , and @xmath1 is an integer . in the transverse directions tunneling can be disregarded , due to the much larger lattice depth . in this work we consider only the motion in the lowest band of the lattice , and we disregard tunneling between non - adjacent sites , assuming @xmath23 for all . in the basis of the wannier states the single particle hamiltonian for motion in the longitudinal direction then becomes @xmath24 with @xmath25 . we have set the zero of energy to be the expectation value of the energy for an atom in a lowest band wannier state , _ i.e. _ @xmath26 . the hilbert space is now represented by a discrete basis of the localized wannier functions , and accordingly we have translated the continuum description of the system into a discrete lattice model . by our definition @xmath27 corresponds to the center of the lowest longitudinal bloch band , and the single - particle energies of the discrete lattice model are @xmath28 . the approximations made are the omission of higher bands , and the neglect of tunneling beyond nearest neighbor sites . both of these restrictions may be relaxed in a systematic way @xcite . we use the longitudinal wannier functions as a basis for the two - particle states on the lattice . hence the two - particle wavefunction @xmath29 will denote the amplitude of finding the atoms in the wannier orbitals @xmath30 and @xmath31 localized around the discrete positions @xmath32 and @xmath33 . considering only the lowest bloch band we have @xmath34 . to analyze the motion of the two particles in the lattice we introduce center of mass , @xmath35 , and relative , @xmath36 , coordinates . for the center of mass motion a plane - wave ansatz @xmath37 is possible , with the first brillouin zone for the center of mass momentum , @xmath38 , running from @xmath39 to @xmath40 . this separation is pertinent , since states with distinct center of mass momenta are not coupled by the interactions or the lattice , and we can thus obtain separate results for the relative motion for each @xmath38 . taking the interaction potential @xmath41 to be purely on - site with strength @xmath42 ( defined in appendix [ sec : calc - param ] ) , the relative motion of two atoms in the open channel is then described by the hamiltonian , @xmath43 , where the relative motion lattice hamiltonian , @xmath44 , contains the discrete laplacian @xcite @xmath45 , \label{lattice_laplacian}\ ] ] and the center of mass energy , @xmath46 . the eigenstates of @xmath47 are discrete plane waves , @xmath48 . the corresponding energies , @xmath49 , are the sum of the single - particle energies of atoms with momenta @xmath50 , @xmath51 $ ] . the ( retarded ) green s function for non - interacting atoms on the lattice is @xmath52^{-1}$ ] , where @xmath53 is a positive infinitesimal . in momentum space it is diagonal @xmath54 while its coordinate space form may be found from @xmath55 due to the delta function interactions we only need to consider @xmath56 . for energies inside the band ( @xmath57 ) the solution is propagating @xmath58 with @xmath59 , while the the solution outside the band ( @xmath60 ) falls off exponentially : @xmath61^{z / a}. \label{g0_z_out}\ ] ] here @xmath62 . for energies above the band the sign of @xmath63 alternates between lattice sites . the green s function related to the open channel hamiltonian , including the interaction , @xmath41 , is found by explicitly solving the dyson equation @xmath64 in coordinate space the result has the simple form @xmath65 defining the diagonal elements of the non - interacting momentum space green s function to be @xmath66^{-1}$ ] the interacting open channel green s function has the momentum space form @xmath67 which follows from the matrix elements of ( [ dyson ] ) in the relative momentum eigenbasis , using that for an on - site interaction the matrix element , @xmath68 , is constant for all @xmath69 . with the expressions for the green s functions the formal solution of the schrdinger equation for the relative motion becomes explicit . below we derive the transmission probability for open channel collisions and analyze the near threshold scattering in terms of a generalized scattering length . this section introduces the concepts and quantities central to the ensuing discussion of two - channel scattering . we first present results relevant to scattering of distinguishable particles , and then discuss how to treat the case of identical bosons or fermions . choosing the situation with the incident wave entering from the left with quasi - momentum @xmath59 , the scattering state of two particles colliding under the influence of the entrance channel potential , @xmath41 , is given by the solution of the lippmann - schwinger equation @xmath70 for our on - site interaction of strength , @xmath42 , the scattering wavefunction becomes @xmath71 where we have used that @xmath72 . we note that for the contact potential @xmath73 equals its asymptotic form @xmath74 everywhere , hence we may readily identify the scattering amplitude for the background interaction : @xmath75 which is unit - less in a one - dimensional system . for the one - dimensional problem and distinguishable particles it is natural to recast this in terms of transmission and reflection amplitudes . these are defined from the left and right asymptotic form of the wavefunction @xmath76 by comparing with ( [ psi_e_bg_asymp ] ) it follows that the transmission amplitude is @xmath77 , while the reflection amplitude coincides with the scattering amplitude , @xmath78 . the resulting transmission probability is @xmath79 as one might expect , the transmission vanishes in the limit where @xmath80 , and approaches unity as the strength of the on - site interaction is diminished . as usual , the reflection coefficient is @xmath81 , which is unity at the edges of the band , where propagation ceases . the minimum value of the reflection probability , @xmath82 , is attained in the middle of the band , @xmath27 . we emphasize that the transmission is independent of the sign of the interaction . this is a special property of the delta - function potential . as usual the scattering amplitude may also be related to the phase shift , @xmath83 , of the scattered wave . in one dimension the relation is @xcite @xmath84 in general there will be two partial waves , corresponding to even and odd solutions of the relative motion problem . for the delta - function interaction the odd partial wave has vanishing phase shift due to symmetry , and the reflection and transmission probabilities are then given by @xmath85 and @xmath86 , respectively . the preceding derivation of the one - dimensional scattering in the lattice assumed that the two colliding atoms are distinguishable . if the collision involves identical bosons or fermions the scattering state @xmath87 must be an even or an odd function of the separation @xmath88 , respectively , to make the wavefunction either symmetric or anti - symmetric under interchange of the two atoms . for fermionic atoms in the same internal state this implies that the wavefunction vanishes for @xmath89 and the contact interaction does not produce any scattering . for identical bosons the properly symmetrized scattering state may be written as @xmath90 when identical particles collide in one dimension the transmission and reflection coefficients have no meaning , since the incoming and outgoing fluxes are identical , however the scattered wave still experiences a phase shift given by ( [ eq : f_and_delta ] ) . even though the transmission profile calculated above does not play a role in the scattering of identical bosons , it may nonetheless be mapped out spectroscopically . consider transitions from a deeper bound state @xmath91 in the molecule to an energy eigenstate inside the band induced by applied rf- or photodissociation fields , which are described by some transition operator @xmath92 . if the initial state is well localized with respect to the lattice spacing , such dissociative transitions towards the state ( [ psi_bg_sym ] ) occur with a probability @xmath93 , obtained above . when the relative quasi - momentum approaches the center or the edges of the brillouin zone , the two - particle energies @xmath94 tend to @xmath95 and the scattering amplitude attains a limiting form @xmath96 with @xmath97 at the bottom of the band and @xmath98 at the top of the band . these limits allow a natural definition of a generalized one - dimensional scattering length in the lattice @xmath99 from the limit @xmath100^{-1}$ ] of the scattering amplitude as @xmath101 @xcite . an equivalent definition is through the derivative of the phase shift with respect to the relative momentum @xmath102 in analogy with the usual free space scattering in three dimensions . our lattice scattering length is a generalization of the usual concept , in that it is defined for collision energies at both the lower _ and _ the upper edge of the continuum . the sign of @xmath103 at the upper edge of the continuum is a convention , which will be justified for the two - channel case below . our generalized scattering length depends on the center of mass motion of the pair , which is a crucial feature in the lattice , especially when we discuss the two - channel case below . for @xmath104 a bound state is situated below the continuum , making @xmath103 positive as expected . in this case the pole of ( [ f_bg_lim ] ) lies along the positive imaginary axis , @xmath105 , and the analytic continuation of the plane wave @xmath106 is the dying exponential of the bound state . conversely , for a repulsively bound pair state lying above the continuum , @xmath107 , and @xmath103 is negative . the pole of the scattering amplitude is then at @xmath108 , corresponding to a wave function decaying exponentially with the separation between the two atoms and a phase factor @xmath109 , which alternates between @xmath110 and @xmath111 from one lattice site to the next , in accordance with the behavior of the green s function for the relative motion at @xmath112 ( [ g0_z_out ] ) . as @xmath113 the scattering length diverges , and the bound state approaches the edge of the continuum . our intuition from scattering theory in three dimensions about the relation between weakly bound states and the scattering length thus holds both below and above the continuum band however , since @xmath42 is proportional to the free space background scattering length , @xmath114 , the generalized one - dimensional scattering length and its three - dimensional equivalent are inversely related @xcite . we now consider scattering in the presence of a feshbach resonance mixing the entrance channel with an energetically closed channel through a coupling , @xmath115 . this gives rise to a set of two coupled equations for the relative motion of an atom pair @xmath116 @xmath117 due to the large splitting between the bound states in the closed channel the resonance physics is faithfully represented by considering only a single bound state , the resonance state @xmath118 , of @xmath119 with an energy @xmath120 with respect to the center of the open channel band . this amounts to a single - pole approximation for the closed channel green s function @xmath121 the resonance state energy @xmath120 is composed , in part , of the free space resonance energy @xmath122 , which is linearly tunable with an applied magnetic field , due to the difference @xmath123 between the separated atoms and the closed channel magnetic moments , and , in part , of the displacement of the closed channel relative to the open channel bloch band as illustrated in fig . [ fig : energydiagram ] . at all magnetic field strengths we take the zero of energy to be the center of the open channel continuum band . in free space the bare resonance energy can be related to the magnetic field position of the zero energy resonance , @xmath124 , as outlined in appendix [ resonance_shift ] . is the energy of @xmath125 relative to the open channel threshold . applying an optical lattice changes the position of the open and closed channel by @xmath126 and @xmath127 , respectively , where @xmath128 is the average atomic energy and @xmath129 is the molecular spectrum of the first bloch band both along direction @xmath91 . note that the position of the open channel thresholds in the lattice depends on the quasi - momentum , @xmath38 , and therefore we choose @xmath27 to be the center of the open channel band . hence , the thresholds are located at @xmath95 . the difference in energy between the closed channel bound state and the center of the open channel band in the presence of the lattice is @xmath130 . ] as a function of continuous position variables the longitudinal lattice potential for each atom is @xmath131 with @xmath132 , and therefore the combined lattice potential for a pair of atoms in the resonance state is @xmath133 where we have introduced the center of mass , @xmath134 , and relative , @xmath135 , coordinates . since the size of the closed channel bound state is much smaller than the lattice spacing , we may consider the limit of @xmath136 for this state . consequently , the resonant state has a center of mass motion corresponding to a lattice potential twice as deep as that governing the motion of the individual atoms , while its mass is the sum of the two atomic masses . this leads to a tunneling rate for the resonant state , @xmath137 , which is much reduced in comparison with the rate at which the free atoms tunnel through the lattice , @xmath138 . this bare molecular tunneling leads to a modulation of the resonance energy with the center of mass momentum of the pair , which we may parametrize as @xmath139 the band averaged resonance energy , @xmath140 , incorporates the relative energy shifts of the atomic and molecular bands in the lattice . with the explicit expression for the closed channel green s function ( [ g_cl_approx ] ) the closed channel part of the scattering problem ( [ coupled_eq2 ] ) may be solved formally : @xmath141 where we have introduced a coupling matrix element , @xmath142 , incorporating the structure of the resonance state . for a typical resonance in alkali collisions the coupling arises due to the difference between the triplet and singlet molecular potentials , and it is therefore inherently of short range compared with the lattice spacing . it is therefore reasonable that the coupling only acts between atoms localized at the same lattice site . the open channel component of the scattering state in the presence of the resonance may then be expressed as @xmath143 \label{psi_op_res}\ ] ] for all @xmath144 . again the relative quasi - momentum of the scattering atoms is @xmath59 , and @xmath145 is the molecular self - energy , which for the onsite coupling may be written as : @xmath146 . from the form of the scattered wave ( [ psi_op_res ] ) the total transmission coefficient including both background and resonant contributions is found to be of the fano form @xcite @xmath147 the fano parameters @xmath148 and @xmath149 depend on the resonance shift and width functions , which are related to the real and imaginary parts of the molecular self - energy , @xmath150 where the real part @xmath151 describes the self consistently determined shift of the resonance position from @xmath152 to @xmath153 , and @xmath154 is the decay width of the resonance state due to the coupling to the continuum . outside the continuum @xmath155 , and the molecules are stable against dissociation . the real part of the molecular self - energy outside the band @xmath156 determines the energies of the bound states for a given resonance energy as described in section [ sec : bound - states ] . the width and shift of the resonance are illustrated in fig . [ fig : shift_and_width ] along with the fano parameters for @xmath157 . throughout the paper we illustrate our analytical results for a set of parameters where @xmath158 and @xmath159 . as outlined in appendix [ sec : calc - param ] this corresponds to @xmath160rb atoms in a lattice with longitudinal and transverse depths of @xmath161 and 30@xmath161 , respectively , in an applied magnetic field tuned close to the feshbach resonance near 414 g @xcite . and width , @xmath162 of the resonance for @xmath157 where the band edges are at @xmath163 ( a ) . the real part of the molecular self - energy is continuous across the band edges and has a pole at the uncoupled bound state energy , @xmath164 ( see section [ sec : bound - states ] ) . the fano parameters , @xmath165 and @xmath10 , parametrize the shape of the transmission resonance ( b ) . here @xmath166 . ] we note that @xmath167 is independent of the coupling , @xmath168 . it is related to the background transmission probability through the relation @xmath169 , which is a consequence of inversion symmetry in the problem @xcite . the reflection maximum of the fano profile occurs at @xmath170 and is nearly independent of the center of mass motion , due to the weak tunneling of the closed channel molecules . this point of total reflection only occurs , when the bare resonance state lies inside the continuum . just as in the non - resonant case the reflection probability is unity at the band edges . hence the reflection profile has two minima , when @xmath171 . when the bare resonance state lies outside the band , @xmath172 has a single minimum . the two - channel reflection profiles are plotted in figs . [ fig : r_vs_k](a)-(d ) and [ fig : r_vs_eres](a ) as colormaps and in figs . [ fig : r_vs_k](e)-(h ) and [ fig : r_vs_eres](c ) as solid lines . for the parameters used in the quantitative calculations throughout this paper @xmath173 , and hence the resonance energy appears nearly independent of @xmath38 in figs . [ fig : r_vs_k](a)-(d ) . for a fixed @xmath157 . the horizontal dashed line is the repulsively bound pair state existing above the band for @xmath174 , while the diagonal dashed curve is the band averaged resonance energy , @xmath175 . ( b ) closed channel population of the bound states . ( c ) cuts showing the reflection probability at @xmath176 0 , -3 , 10 , and @xmath177 ( solid lines from top to bottom at @xmath27 ) . the dashed curve indicate the reflection profile in the absence of the coupling . ] the condition for total transmission is @xmath178 , corresponding to @xmath179 . as @xmath152 is ramped upwards ( downwards ) starting below ( above ) the band , this point of destructive interference between the direct and resonant scattering amplitudes first appears at the magnetic field , where a bound state of the coupled channels system enters the continuum to become a scattering resonance . as we shall see below , this occurs at two critical values where @xmath180 - exactly the points delineating the region , where the condition @xmath178 can be satisfied . the reflection profile will thus only have both a fano maximum and a fano minimum if the conditions @xmath171 and @xmath181 are simultaneously met . neglecting the background interaction corresponds to the limit @xmath182 , or equivalently @xmath183 . in this case the resonance shift vanishes and the reflection probability assumes a simple breit - wigner - like profile @xcite @xmath184 ^ 2+\frac{\hbar^2\gamma_0 ^ 2(e , k)}{4}},\ ] ] where @xmath185 . the opposite limit of @xmath186 on the other hand corresponds to @xmath187 and @xmath188 , giving rise to a breit - wigner - like form of the transmission coefficient @xmath189 ^ 2+\frac{\hbar^2\gamma_\infty^2(e , k)}{4}},\ ] ] corresponding to a dip in the reflection probability at the resonance , which now occurs at @xmath190 . the resonance shift , @xmath191 , is independent of energy and momentum , while the width is given by @xmath192 . both the shift and the width approach zero as the strength of the onsite interaction is increased . the observations regarding indistinguishable particles in section [ sec : identical ] can be directly carried over to the situation with more than one scattering channel . again , the transmission coefficient @xmath193 has no straightforward meaning in the scattering of identical bosons . but following fano @xcite it is clear that the transition probability from an initial state @xmath91 to the stationary scattering state @xmath194 under the action of some transition operator @xmath92 is @xmath195 . therefore , the resonance profile is accessible spectroscopically by scanning the energy of the final state across the continuum . starting from a deeper bound state of the system the dissociated atom signal will have the same energy variation as @xmath193 . the scattering amplitude in the coupled channels case consists of a background and a resonant contribution , @xmath196 , where the resonant part @xmath197 ^ 2}{e - e_{\rm{res}}(b , k)-\sigma_m(e , k ) } \label{f_res}\ ] ] is obtained by comparing ( [ psi_op_res ] ) with @xmath198 for @xmath199 . the phase shift is related to the scattering amplitude in the same way as in the single - channel case . as in the case of single - channel scattering we define the one - dimensional scattering length , @xmath200 , from the limit of the scattering amplitude , @xmath201^{-1}$ ] , at the extrema of the relative energy , @xmath202 . after some algebra we arrive at the simple expression @xmath203 \label{a_1d}\ ] ] for the scattering length , with the upper and lower sign corresponding to the top and the bottom edge of the continuum , respectively . this lattice scattering length is of the standard feshbach form @xcite , and reduces to the non - resonant expression ( [ a_bg ] ) , when the coupling @xmath168 is set to zero . however , the generalized , magnetic field dependent scattering length at the top and the bottom of the continuum differ , in that they do not diverge at the same value of the resonance energy . the motivation for the chosen sign convention of the scattering length at the upper band edge is guided by the rationale that the two scattering lengths then become equal in the limit of a deep lattice , where @xmath204 goes to zero . ) . solid lines show @xmath205 at @xmath206 0 , 0.4 , and 0.7 @xmath40 ( from the left to the right ) , while the dashed lines correspond to @xmath207 at the same @xmath38-values ( increasing from the right to the left ) . ( b ) the corresponding binding energies below the band ( solid lines ) and above the band ( dashed lines ) and the limiting form ( [ e_bind_universal ] ) , valid near the feshbach resonances in @xmath208 ( thin dot - dashed lines ) . ] it is convenient to define a pair of detunings @xmath209 , where @xmath210 . we thus get two resonance positions , one for scattering near the upper band edge , and one for scattering near the lower band edge , as shown in fig . [ fig : a_1d ] . we caution that the relative position of @xmath211 and @xmath212 depends on the sign of the magnetic moment difference , @xmath123 . if @xmath213 ( @xmath214 ) , then @xmath211 lies above ( below ) @xmath212 . the lattice resonance positions @xmath211 and @xmath212 are shown in fig . [ fig : b0 ] as function of the lattice depth , @xmath215 . they are separated by @xmath216 and approach each other as @xmath215 is increased , since @xmath217 decreases when the lattice becomes deeper . furthermore , in the limit where both the transverse and the longitudinal lattice depths are large , _ i.e. _ , @xmath218 , the wannier orbitals approach harmonic oscillator states , and we have that @xmath219 , while @xmath220 and @xmath221 . this gives the following asymptotic behavior of the magnetic field resonance position @xmath222 + \frac{e_{\rm r}}{\delta\mu}\sqrt{v_0^{\parallel } } + \frac{2e_{\rm{r}}}{\delta\mu}\sqrt{v_0^\perp}\ ] ] where @xmath223 is the feshbach resonance position in the absence of the lattice , and the dimensionless function @xmath224 is defined in appendix [ resonance_shift ] . the asymptotic behavior is indicated by the black dash - dotted curves in fig . [ fig : b0 ] . . @xmath211 and @xmath212 are plotted for @xmath225 ( dashed curves ) and @xmath226 ( solid curves ) . in the example @xmath227 is positive so both @xmath211-curves lie above their respective @xmath212-curves . the left axis shows @xmath228 relative to the feshbach resonance position in the absence of the lattice , and the right axis shows the actual magnetic field position for the specific feshbach resonance considered @xcite . the black dash - dotted curves are given by eq . ( [ eq : asymptoticb ] ) . ] as shown in sec . [ sec : binding_energy ] the divergence of the lattice scattering length is associated with a bound state entering or leaving the continuum . hence the lattice gives rise to a @xmath38-dependent shift of the magnetic field threshold for the formation of two - body bound states away from the resonance position in free space . this fact , illustrated in fig . [ fig : a_1d ] , was also observed by orso _ et al . _ @xcite who solved the two - body physics in a one - dimensional optical lattice within a single - channel model . the zero - crossing of the scattering length occurs for @xmath229 , which corresponds to magnetic field values , @xmath230 , shifted from the resonance positions . the bound state solutions of the coupled - channels problem have energies , @xmath231 , coinciding with the poles of the scattering amplitude @xmath232 . the pole locations satisfy the equation @xmath233=\frac{{\mathcal{w}}^2{\rm{sgn}}(e_b)}{e_b - e_{\rm{res}}(b , k ) } , \label{e_bind}\ ] ] and can be determined as a subset of the roots of a quartic polynomial . the bound state energies are plotted as the solid lines in figs . [ fig : r_vs_k](a)-(d ) and [ fig : r_vs_eres](a ) . if @xmath234 the entrance channel bound state energy is @xmath235 with a wavefunction proportional to @xmath236 . this single - channel bound state is indicated by the sinusoidal dashed line in fig [ fig : r_vs_k](a)-(d ) and the horizontal dashed line in fig . [ fig : r_vs_eres](a ) . an important consequence of the structured continuum in the lattice potential is that the stability of a molecular bound state may depend on its center of mass momentum . for a given magnetic field , the scattering resonance only exists for a range of center of mass motion bloch states , as shown in fig . [ fig : r_vs_k](c)-(d ) @xcite . outside this range there is instead a true bound state of the system . such motionally bound states are stabilized by their kinetic energy , which displaces the pair state into the band gap for the relative motion , where the pair can not disintegrate . hence , for a fixed magnetic field , where a molecule at rest is unstable , accelerating the lattice provides a new avenue for tuning the feshbach resonance . the bound state pairs can tunnel together through the lattice with an effective tunneling rate , which depends on their binding energy . we now determine the tunneling matrix element of the pairs directly from their dispersion relation . in the absence of atomic tunneling processes , @xmath237 , and the energies of the bound states are given by @xmath238 ^ 2}{4}+{\mathcal{w}}^2}. \label{ebound_no_tunneling}\ ] ] with the inter - channel coupling turned off these zero tunneling bound state energies reduce to the uncoupled pair state energies for @xmath239 ; @xmath175 and @xmath42 . with a small non - vanishing single - particle tunneling amplitude we may expand ( [ e_bind ] ) to lowest order in @xmath240 and find @xmath241 comparing the momentum dependent part of the bound state energy with the dispersion relation for non - interacting pairs , @xmath242 , we see that in the limit of a deep lattice the bound atom pairs tunnel through the lattice with an effective tunneling rate @xmath243 as one would expect from arguments based on second order perturbation theory @xcite . we emphasize that the molecule dispersion depends on the applied magnetic field . cooperative tunneling of atom pairs consistent with an effective pair hopping matrix element given by @xmath244 has been demonstrated experimentally by measurement of the frequency of population transfer in a double well @xcite and by demonstrating that the transport properties of an attractive fermi gas in an optical lattice depends strongly on the formation of local pairs @xcite . instead of the bound state energy it is often instructive to consider the _ binding energy _ , defined as the distance of the bound state energy from the ( upper or lower ) band edge : @xmath245 the binding energy is positive for a bound state lying above the band and negative for a bound pair below the continuum . from fig . [ fig : r_vs_k](a)-(d ) we observe that the binding energy increases with increasing @xmath246 in agreement with the single - channel calculation in @xcite , which only discussed bound states with negative binding energy as no transverse confinement was included . as @xmath231 approaches either of the band edges , the binding energy vanishes in a particularly simple way . to see this we observe that @xmath247 for @xmath248 . replacing @xmath231 with @xmath249 in the denominator on the right hand side in ( [ e_bind ] ) it then follows that @xmath250 ^ 2},\ ] ] as the bound state energy approaches @xmath249 . the denominator is exactly the resonance shape of the generalized scattering length ( [ a_1d ] ) , and the binding energy therefore approaches the universal form @xmath251 when the scattering length is tuned to be large with respect to the lattice spacing @xmath252 in the vicinity of the feshbach resonance . we have introduced the effective _ reduced _ mass @xmath253 of the atom pair with center of mass quasi - momentum , @xmath38 , in the lattice . its limits at the top and the bottom of the band are @xmath254 , with the upper ( lower ) sign applying for @xmath255 ( @xmath256 ) . these limits are plotted in fig . [ fig : m_eff ] as a function of @xmath38 . from the expression for the effective reduced mass it is clear that the sign of the universal binding energy expression ( [ e_bind_universal ] ) adheres to the definition above . the criteria of applicability for the quadratic approximation is @xmath257 , or @xmath258 . the universal expression ( [ e_bind_universal ] ) is compared with the exact binding energies in fig . [ fig : a_1d](b ) both above and below the continuum . due to the proximity of the zero crossing of @xmath259 , where ( [ e_bind_universal ] ) diverges , the agreement below the band is worse than above the band . from eqs . ( [ a_1d ] ) and ( [ e_bind_universal ] ) it is clear that the binding energy vanishes when @xmath260 . this condition for the disappearance of the feshbach bound state coincides with the critical resonance energy at which the fano profile develops a point of total transmission , as anticipated above . experimentally the binding energy of the dimer states can be measured by modulating the depth of the lattice . the bound pairs dissociate , when the frequency of modulation satisfies a resonance condition , such that the dimers can exchange energy with the undulating lattice . the resonance is marked by the appearance of unbound atoms @xcite . the formal solution of the bound state problem consistent with the single - pole approximation for the closed channel green s function is @xmath261 where the closed channel population , @xmath262 , is determined by the normalization condition : @xmath263 . in coordinate space the open channel component of the bound state wavefunction therefore becomes @xmath264 while the closed channel component of the bound state is described by @xmath265 . here we have used that the coupling is of zero range , and that the bare resonance state is localized on a single lattice site . the closed channel weight of a bound atom pair with energy @xmath231 is @xmath266 ^ 2}\frac{|e_b|}{(e_b^2-e_k^2)^{3/2}}\right]^{-1 } , \label{z}\ ] ] which is plotted in figs [ fig : r_vs_k](i)-(l ) and [ fig : r_vs_eres](b ) . as the bound state approaches the upper or the lower band edge , it follows from the limiting form of the binding energy that @xmath267 , and consequently @xmath262 vanishes as @xmath268 in the limit where @xmath269 . in momentum space the open channel part of the bound state wavefunction is given by @xmath270 which is peaked near the center of the brillouin zone ( @xmath271 ) when the bound state energy is negative , and peaked near the edges of the brillouin zone ( @xmath272 ) for @xmath273 , making it possible to discern the bound states with @xmath274 from those with @xmath273 in time of flight imaging @xcite . this reflects that @xmath275 is predominantly comprised of the @xmath276-states with energies , @xmath94 , in proximity of @xmath231 . for @xmath273 ( @xmath274 ) this corresponds to the states near the top ( bottom ) of the band . the height of the peaks is reduced as @xmath38 approaches @xmath277 , where all relative motion quasi - momentum states are degenerate in our model . the closed channel component of the bound state is independent of the relative momentum : @xmath278 . , where a weakly bound molecular state ( solid line , narrow bars ) at rest is situated just below the band . the repulsively bound pair state lying above the band ( dashed line , thick bars ) , is peaked at the edge of the brillouin zone , and its sign alternates from one site to the next . the first column shows the momentum space wavefunction ( [ phi_mom ] ) in units of @xmath279 , the second column @xmath280 . ] the size of the bound state @xmath281 ^ 2}\frac{e_k^2}{(e^2_b - e^2_k)^2},\ ] ] reflects the magnitude of the binding energy of atom pairs . in particular , it diverges when the bound state enters the continuum from above or from below : @xmath282 in this limit the open channel part of the bound state wavefunction assumes a universal form @xmath283^{z / a}.\ ] ] the bound state wavefunctions are shown in fig . [ fig : bound_state_wf ] in both coordinate and momentum space for @xmath284 . at this resonance energy a bound molecular state exists just below the band for @xmath157 ( lower bound state branch in fig . [ fig : r_vs_k](b ) ) . with a small binding energy , this state extends over several lattice sites as shown in fig [ fig : bound_state_wf ] . for the repulsively bound pair state lying above the band ( upper bound state branch in fig . [ fig : r_vs_k](b ) ) the sign of the coordinate space wavefunction alternates between lattice sites . we have previously shown that a molecule has a finite probability of surviving a sweep through the continuum band when the applied magnetic field is varied across the feshbach resonance @xcite . the survival probability increases the faster the sweep and the weaker the coupling to the continuum . given the existence of motionally bound states , an alternative experiment to investigate the passage of a molecule through the continuum may then be conducted by starting with the applied magnetic field held at a value such that @xmath285 , and molecules at rest prepared in the bound state with energy below @xmath175 ( represented by the the lower branch of bound states in figs . [ fig : r_vs_k ] and [ fig : r_vs_eres ] ) . accelerating the lattice imparts momentum @xmath286 to the molecules . if the magnetic field is then ramped adiabatically to a new value , where @xmath287 the moving molecules remain stable , while molecules at rest are now subject to dissociative decay . with a further acceleration of the lattice , either in the opposite direction , or in the same direction , but letting @xmath38 cross one or several brillouin zones , the molecules may be swept through the continuum to a final state with center of mass momentum @xmath288 , where the molecules are stable provided @xmath289 . the probability of a molecule surviving the center of mass momentum ramp through the continuum depends on the rate of lattice acceleration and the strength of the coupling to the continuum states . in this section we will perform a spectral analysis based on the full green s functions of both the open channel atoms and closed channel molecules . in general , given a retarded green s operator , @xmath290 , the corresponding spectral function is the imaginary part of the diagonal green s function , @xmath291 , in a basis @xmath292 of orthonormal states . for the unperturbed system ( @xmath42=@xmath168=0 ) the spectral function is @xmath293 where the density of states is @xmath294 for @xmath57 . the unperturbed system has no bound states , and hence the spectral function is zero at all energies outside the continuum band . inside the band the scattering states are equally distributed over the whole lattice , making the spectral function translationally invariant and directly proportional to the density of states , which diverges at the band edges , @xmath295 . both for the single - channel and the two - channel case we will need the entrance channel green s function , @xmath296 , _ i.e. _ , the propagator from one relative coordinate in the lattice , @xmath297 , to another , @xmath88 . when we consider just a single scattering channel this can be obtained from the dyson equation ( [ dyson ] ) : @xmath298 where we have used that the unperturbed green s function is translationally invariant . this expression for @xmath299 reduces to eq . ( [ gu_z ] ) when @xmath88 or @xmath297 is equal to zero . for the spectral function we have to treat @xmath57 and @xmath60 separately . outside the continuum @xmath63 is real and we obtain the spectral function @xmath300 where @xmath301 is the decay constant for the bound state . this gives the probability distribution for finding a bound state atom pair @xmath88 lattice sites apart , when the bound state energy is @xmath302 . inside the band we find @xmath303 where @xmath73 is the scattering wave defined in eq . ( [ psi_e_bg ] ) . changing the sign of @xmath88 is equivalent to changing the direction of the incoming wave in the scattering wave from @xmath276 to @xmath304 . these two waves are degenerate and therefore it is natural to expect the average of the two for a given energy in the spectral function . we have used that the density of states is unchanged for elastic scattering , _ i.e. _ @xmath305 is also the density of states for atoms scattering under the influence of @xmath41 . it is instructive to calculate the total spectral weight residing inside the continuum band : @xmath306 with the addition of the bound state contribution ( [ eq : a_u_bound ] ) the sum rule , @xmath307 , is then seen to be satisfied . when we have two coupled channels there is a spectral density for both the open channel atoms and the closed channel molecules . we start by addressing the latter . the dressed green s function for the closed channel is found by summing all the terms in the dyson series based on the bare propagator ( [ g_cl_approx ] ) . the result is @xmath308 where @xmath309 is the molecular self - energy ( [ sigma_cl ] ) . if @xmath310 is outside the continuum , @xmath311 is real , and the spectral function is only non - zero at the poles of @xmath312 , which coincide with those of the scattering amplitudes , _ i.e. _ the bound states of the coupled channels problem ( [ e_bind ] ) . the spectral weight at the poles is given by the corresponding residues , which are just the probability of finding the bound state pair in the closed channel , @xmath262 : @xmath313 for energies inside the continuum , we obtain the usual structure , @xmath314 ^ 2 + \frac{\hbar^2\gamma^2(e , k)}{4 } } , \label{eq : a_m_continuum}\ ] ] where the energy dependent shift , @xmath315 , and decay rate , @xmath316 , are defined in eqs . ( [ eq : delta ] ) and ( [ eq : gamma ] ) , respectively . in the middle of the band the shift and width are slowly varying functions of energy , and the molecular spectral function has an approximately lorentzian shape with a peak position given approximately by the resonance energy @xmath152 . however , near the band edges significant deviations from this simple form arise due to the strong interference with the continuum threshold . this leads to a double peak structure of @xmath317 , when the bound state is about to enter the continuum from below , as is evident from fig . [ fig : a_m ] , which shows @xmath317 as a function of the energy and @xmath152 for a molecule at rest . . inside the band @xmath317 is a continuous function given by ( [ eq : a_m_continuum ] ) . outside the band the delta function peaks at the bound state poles of the propagator , @xmath312 , are indicated by vertical lines with a height of @xmath318 . offset below is a contour plot of @xmath317 inside the band , with bright colors indicating high spectral density . the solid lines in this plane are the bound state energies , while @xmath175 is indicated by the dashed line . ] the molecule lifetime also follows from fermi s golden rule , @xmath319 . though the density of states diverges at the edges of the continuum ( van hove singularities ) the decay rate goes to zero at both thresholds , due to vanishing overlap of the background scattering state with the bare resonance state when @xmath320 . for the open channel the full green s function in the resonant case reads @xmath321 where @xmath322 $ ] is the self - energy for the relative motion of an atom pair in the open channel . this gives the spectral function @xmath323 ^ 2\delta(e - e_b)\ ] ] for energies outside the band . the open channel green s functions has exactly the same poles as the molecular propagator ( [ eq : g_m ] ) , but the residues at the atomic poles depend on the separation between the atoms in the pair . however , using the identity @xmath324 one may show that @xmath325 such that the combined spectral weight of the open channel and closed channel at a pole is unity . we must sum over all possible separations for the open channel weight , since the component of the bound state wavefunction in the open channel is distributed over the lattice according to ( [ eq : psi_b_op ] ) . thus far we have only investigated the dynamics in the lowest bloch band of the lattice potential . in this section we analyze the neglected coupling to higher bands . first we estimate the size of the second order energy shift from the excluded higher bands and derive a criterion for the validity of our theoretical model . next , in sec . [ sec : incl - high - bloch ] we discuss how a modest coupling to higher atomic bands is expected to modify the central conclusions of this work . in this section we set up a criterion for using the theory , by comparing the second order energy shift from the omitted atomic and molecular exited bloch bands to the relevant energy scales . the dominant contribution to the energy shift comes from the bare resonance state coupling to atom pairs in higher bands , while the shift from open channel atoms coupling to higher molecular bloch bands are several orders of magnitude smaller for two reasons . firstly , the coupling matrix elements between an atom pair in the lowest band and an excited band bare molecule are much smaller than the coupling to a molecule in the lowest band ( see appendix [ sec : mol - couplings ] ) . secondly , the energy splitting between the ground and excited molecular bands is larger than the atomic band gap , since the molecules experience a deeper lattice potential . hence we approximate the unperturbed wavefunction by @xmath326 , the resonance state in the lowest molecular band . for simplicity we will furthermore assume the width of the bloch bands to be small compared to the separation from the lowest band , so that the energy can be approximated by the average energy of the band . under these assumptions the second order energy shift is @xmath327 where the sum is over pairs of atoms in the @xmath12th and @xmath1th bloch band , @xmath328 is the inter - band coupling matrix element defined in appendix [ sec : calc - param ] , and @xmath329 is the average energy of the @xmath12th band . if the atoms are identical bosons , we can take the sum to be over @xmath330 to avoid double counting . we will require the shift to be small compared to the relevant energy scales . if @xmath331 is comparable to the gap between the ground and first excited band @xmath332 , the higher bands will become populated , and the lowest band approximation of our model will break down @xcite . on the other hand a stronger condition can be derived by requiring that the energy shift be small in comparison with the width of the ground band , @xmath333 , which sets the relevant energy scale for the dynamics in our model . by fitting the respective energies from numerical band structure calculations at different lattice depths we arrive at the condition @xmath334 where @xmath335 when comparing @xmath331 with the band gap , and @xmath336 when requiring the energy shift to be much smaller than the width of the lowest band @xcite . the scaling factors are the bohr radius , @xmath337 , the bohr magneton , @xmath338 , gauss ( g ) , the atomic mass unit ( @xmath339 ) , and nanometers . if both criteria are met , coupling to higher bands can be safely neglected . otherwise , if the energy shift incurred from the coupling to atoms in higher bloch bands is significant with respect to the band width yet negligible with regards to the band gap , we might expect quantitative changes to our results , but as we discuss below , the qualitative features of our model will remain . in the case where the lowest band approximation fails coupling to higher bands can be systematically accounted for in the tight binding limit @xcite , leading to an effective single - band hamiltonian with a non - local coupling between dressed molecules and unbound atom pairs @xcite . both of the above stated conditions can be fulfilled for the feshbach resonance studied by syassen _ _ in @xmath160rb near 414 g @xcite . in the entrance channel both atoms are in the @xmath340 hyperfine state . the resonance is narrow , with @xmath341 mg , and has a very small difference in magnetic moments between the two channels , @xmath342 khz / g , which is preferable if eq . ( [ eq : validity_condition ] ) is to hold . a final condition for our results to be experimentally relevant is that the variation of the resonance energy due to magnetic field noise @xmath343 is much smaller than the bandwidth @xmath333 . with a lattice wavelength of 830.44 nm @xcite the recoil energy is @xmath344 khz ( equivalent to @xmath345 ) and for the particular resonance considered here @xmath34632 mg . for a longitudinal lattice depth of @xmath161 we therefore require @xmath347 according to table [ tab : parameters ] . in ref . @xcite the magnetic field noise was found to be less than 4 mg . as discussed in the previous subsection the major correction to our model comes from the coupling to higher atomic bands . we now include these couplings into our model . for each atomic band we apply the analysis of sec . [ sec : entr - chann - greens ] to obtain band specific green s functions @xmath348 and @xmath349 for the relative motion of one atom in bloch band @xmath12 and another in band @xmath1 . as for the first band @xmath350 is the green s function for noninteracting particles and @xmath351 is the green s function for particles with an on - site interaction , @xmath41 . we determine @xmath348 and @xmath349 by replacing @xmath94 by @xmath352 $ ] in eq . , and replacing @xmath42 by the band specific interaction strength @xmath353 in eq . ( for the definition of @xmath353 see appendix [ sec : calc - param ] ) . we now introduce the coupling @xmath115 between the first molecular band and all the atomic bands . this gives the molecular self - energy @xmath354 which reduces to ( [ sigma_cl ] ) , when we exclude contributions from higher bands . because we only consider energies well outside the excited bands , @xmath355 is real and slowly varying with energy for @xmath356 . therefore we conclude that the lifetime @xmath316 of the molecules is unchanged and that the change in the resonance shift @xmath357 must vary slowly . a change of the resonance shift by an amount @xmath358 will affect some of the results in secs . [ sec : two - chann - scatt ] , [ sec : bound - states ] and [ sec : resonant - case ] . the changes amount to simply replacing @xmath359 by @xmath360 , a renormalized resonance energy . for @xmath27 and @xmath157 we obtain for the parameters in @xcite an approximate relationship for the change in resonance shift @xmath361 due to the higher atomic bands @xcite . for the lattice depth used throughout this paper @xmath358 is only 2% of the bandwidth @xmath333 , and it is reasonable to neglect higher bands . a direct coupling between ground and excited atomic bands may be included by renormalizing the local interactions to include the effect of virtual transitions to excited levels through band changing collisions . this leads to an energy dependent correction to the coupling parameters @xcite . but since the correction is inversely proportional to the gap separating the ground and excited bands , it is also expected to be small . we have assumed onsite interactions and only nearest - neighbor tunneling in all atomic bands which is a questionable assumption for the higher bands , but eq . ( [ eq : deltachange ] ) still provides an estimate of the magnitude of the correction to the real part of the molecular self - energy . we have presented a complete description of the feshbach physics of an atom pair in an optical lattice represented by a discrete two - channel hamiltonian . we have demonstrated how the structured continuum due to the periodic potential modifies the resonance line shape and position as well as the properties of the bound states outside the continuum . the lattice potential facilitates repulsively bound pair states in the gap between the two - particle bloch bands , and near a feshbach resonance a further class of exotic bound states may be created , which are only stable when their center of mass momentum exceeds a critical value , thus enabling us to tune the feshbach physics by controlling the molecular motion . ignoring the small modulation of the resonance energy due to tunneling of the bare molecules , the feshbach molecules are stable bound states of the system if their center of mass quasi - momentum in the first brillouin zone satisfies @xmath362 , where @xmath363 if @xmath364 the pair state lies inside the continuum and decays with a rate @xmath162 , which we have determined analytically . for magnetic fields such that @xmath365 the feshbach molecules are stable for all @xmath38 . note that while the decay rate near threshold is proportional to the density of states , which diverges at the band edges , @xmath162 goes continuously to zero as @xmath310 approaches the edge of the continuum , since the overlap between the bare resonance state and the open channel continuum states is suppressed due to the background interactions in the open channel . an additional effect of the background interactions is to shift and modify the resonance profile . with a non - zero onsite interaction @xmath42 the position of the resonance is shifted away from the bare resonance energy @xmath120 , and the transmission of atoms in the open channel is described by a fano profile , with a shape determined by the energy dependent shift and width of the resonance . the energy dependence is most pronounced near the band edges , where the coupling to the continuum is strongest . this gives rise to threshold effects , when the resonance energy is tuned close to the band edge , as evidenced e.g. in the double peak structure of the molecule spectral function . we have outlined how the energy dependence of the scattering can be mapped out spectroscopically by inducing dissociative transitions from molecular bound states to two - particle scattering states inside the band . from the expansion of the scattering amplitude as the collision energy approaches the band edges we have defined a generalized scattering length , which exhibits a feshbach resonance at both the lower and the upper threshold of the continuum . the diverging scattering length coincides with the appearance / disappearance of the feshbach bound state . in the limit of a deep lattice potential the lowest bloch band narrows , and these two resonances coalesce . since the bare molecules and the entrance channel atoms experience different lattice induced energy offsets , the position of both the upper and the lower threshold feshbach resonance is shifted relative to the position of the feshbach resonance in free space . for the specific resonance we have considered here , this shift exceeds the width of the resonance . for the interaction between the atoms in the open channel we assume that @xmath41 is a contact potential of strength @xmath366 , where @xmath367 is the ( free space ) background scattering length . therefore the on - site interaction between a pair of atoms in bands @xmath12 and @xmath1 becomes @xmath368 ^ 4 \nonumber \\ & & \times\int dx_3 \ , \big [ w_{n0}^\parallel(x_3)w_{m0}^\parallel(x_3 ) \big]^2,\end{aligned}\ ] ] under the assumption that only the lowest band in the transverse lattice is occupied . since all lattice wells are identical , the integrals can be performed over wannier functions centered on any site . the coupling to the closed channel is of short range , since it is proportional to the difference between the atomic triplet and singlet potentials , which have the same long range form @xcite . in addition , the closed channel bound state has a size ( typically tens of ) , which is small compared with the lattice spacing ( hundreds of nm ) . we thus assume a purely on - site coupling , which in free space would couple molecular and atomic plane wave states with a strength @xmath369 . here @xmath123 is the difference between the closed and open channel magnetic moments and @xmath370 is the magnetic field width of the feshbach resonance in the absence of the lattice . in the discrete lattice model this results in the matrix element @xmath371 for the coupling of a pair of atoms in bands @xmath12 and @xmath1 to a bare molecule in band @xmath372 . the matrix elements are zero whenever @xmath373 is even due to parity of the wannier functions . a molecule experiences twice as deep a lattice as the atoms , see eq . ( [ v_lat_mol ] ) , and has twice the atomic mass . consequently , separate wannier functions , @xmath374 , have to be calculated for the center of mass motion of the resonance state . with the exception of sec . [ sec : validity ] we will consider exclusively the lowest bloch band for the atoms and molecules . therefore , we will only need three parameters to characterize the dynamics in the lattice : @xmath375 , @xmath376 and @xmath377 . as discussed in section [ sec : validity ] our discrete lattice model is valid for a narrow feshbach resonance . as a particular example we use the resonance in @xmath160rb near 414 g , which has been studied by syassen _ et al . _ @xcite . for this resonance @xmath341 mg and @xmath342 khz / g , while the background scattering length is 100.8 bohr radii . for all the plots in this paper we consider a lattice with @xmath378 and @xmath379 . this results in interaction parameters @xmath380 and @xmath381 . table [ tab : parameters ] gives the relevant model parameters for this resonance and a range of lattice depths . .discrete lattice parameters for the @xmath160rb feshbach resonance near 414 g. the recoil energy is @xmath344 khz . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] in free space the coupling between the collision channels induces a shift from the magnetic field @xmath382 , where the resonance state is degenerate with the entrance channel threshold [ @xmath383 , to the position @xmath384 of the scattering length divergence . this offset may be approximately evaluated by @xmath385 here @xmath386 $ ] is a dimensionless function of the ratio @xmath387 between the background ( free space ) scattering length and the so - called mean scattering length @xmath388 , which is a characteristic length scale of the long range @xmath389 part of the molecular potential @xcite . in the lattice the energy of the closed channel resonance state relative to the zero of energy ( center of the lowest band ) is then given by @xmath390+e_m(k)-e_a,\ ] ] where the lattice induced energy shifts @xmath391 and @xmath392 of the open and closed channel , respectively , are defined in fig . [ fig : energydiagram ] . the molecular wannier states , @xmath393 , where @xmath394 and @xmath395 refers to the molecular bloch band index and lattice site index along direction @xmath91 , respectively , constitute a complete set on which we can expand the atomic function @xmath396\times w_{n0}^\parallel(x_3)w_{m0}^\parallel(x_3)$ ] . if we denote the expansion coefficients @xmath397 , we have @xmath398 and @xmath399 , where @xmath400 is the @xmath401-norm . now a simple norm argument gives the following identity for the neglected molecular couplings to higher bands @xmath402 where @xmath403 for the 414 g resonance in @xmath160rb . for a lattice with @xmath404 and @xmath226 this results in the estimate @xmath405 for an atom pair in the lowest band ( @xmath406 ) . we therefore neglect the coupling of ground band atoms to molecules in higher bands in comparison with the matrix elements , which couple molecules in the lowest bloch band with excited atom pairs . m. ben dahan , e. peik , j. reichel , y. castin , and c. salomon , phys . lett . * 76 * 4508 ( 1996 ) . s. r. wilkinson , c. f. bharucha , k. w. madison , q. niu , and m. g. raizen , phys . rev . lett . * 76 * , 4512 ( 1996 ) . m. greiner , m. o. mandel , t. esslinger , t. hnsch , and i. bloch , nature ( london ) * 415 * , 39 ( 2002 ) . i. bloch , j. dalibard , and w. zwerger , rev . * 80 * , 885 ( 2008 ) . o. mandel , m. greiner , a. widera , t. rom , t. w. hnsch , and i. bloch , nature ( london ) * 425 * , 937 ( 2003 ) . t. khler , k. gral , and p. s. julienne , rev . phys . * 78 * , 1311 ( 2006 ) . g. thalhammer , k. winkler , f. lang , s. schmid , r. grimm , and j. hecker denschlag , phys . . lett . * 96 * , 050402 ( 2006 ) . t. volz , n. syassen , d. m. bauer , e. hansis , s. drr , and g. rempe , nature phys . * 2 * , 692 ( 2006 ) . k. winkler , g. thalhammer , f. lang , r. grimm , j. hecker denschlag , a. j. daley , a. kantian , h. p. bchler , and p. zoller , nature ( london ) * 441 * , 853 ( 2006 ) . c. ospelkaus , s. ospelkaus , l. humbert , p. ernst , k. sengstock , and k. bongs , phys . lett . * 97 * , 120402 ( 2006 ) . p. a. f. da veiga , l. ioriatti , and m. ocarroll , phys . e * 66 * , 016130 ( 2002 ) . s. m. mahajan and a. thyagaraja , j. phys . a * 39 * , l667 ( 2006 ) . j. hecker denschlag and a. j. daley , proceedings of the international school of physics `` enrico fermi '' , course clxiv , ultra - cold fermi gases , e - print arxiv : cond - mat/ 0610393 . m. grupp , r. walser , w. p. schleich , a. muramatsu , and m. weitz , j. phys . b. * 40 * , 2703 ( 2007 ) . n. nygaard , b. i. schneider , and p. s. julienne , phys . a * 73 * , 042705 ( 2006 ) . u. fano , phys . rev . * 124 * , 1866 ( 1961 ) . p. w. anderson , phys . rev . * 124 * , 41 ( 1961 ) . duan , phys . lett . * 95 * , 243202 ( 2005 ) . l. d. carr and m. j. holland , phys . rev . a * 72 * , 031604(r ) ( 2005 ) . f. zhou , phys . b * 72 * , 220501(r ) ( 2005 ) . n. nygaard , r. piil , and k. mlmer , phys . a * 77 * , 021601(r ) ( 2008 ) . s. flling , s. trotzky , p. cheinet , m. feld , r. saers , a. widera , t. mller , and i. bloch , nature ( london ) * 448 * , 1029 ( 2007 ) . n. strohmaier , y. takasu , k. gnter , r. jrdens , m. khl , h. moritz , and t. esslinger , phys . lett * 99 * , 220601 ( 2007 ) . n. syassen , d. m. bauer , m. lettner , d. dietze , t. volz , s. drr , and g. rempe , phys . lett . * 99 * , 033201 ( 2007 ) . j. u. nckel and a. d. stone , phys . b * 50 * , 17415 ( 1994 ) . m. olshanii , phys . lett . * 81 * , 938 ( 1998 ) . t. bergeman , m. g. moore , and m. olshanii , phys . * 91 * , 163201 ( 2003 ) . v. peano , m. thorwart , c. mora , and r. egger , new . j. phys . * 7 * , 192 ( 2005 ) . j. i. kim , j. schmiedmayer , and p. schmelcher , phys . a * 72 * , 042711 ( 2005 ) . v. a. yurovsky , phys . a * 71 * , 012709 ( 2005 ) . v. a. yurovsky , phys . rev . a * 73 * , 052709 ( 2006 ) . r. piil and k. mlmer , phys . a * 76 * , 023607 ( 2007 ) . s. a. gurvitz and y. b. levinson , phys . b * 47 * , 10578 ( 1993 ) . j. eberly , am . j. phys . * 33 * , 771 ( 1965 ) . a. j. moerdijk , b. j. verhaar , and a. axelsson , phys . a * 51 * , 4852 ( 1995 ) . g. orso , l. p. pitaevskii , s. stringari , and m. wouters , phys . * 95 * , 060402 ( 2005 ) . r. micnas , j. ranninger , and s. robaszkiewicz , rev . * 62 * , 113 ( 1990 ) . a. b. kuklov and b. v. svistunov , phys . * 90 * , 100401 ( 2003 ) . duan , e. demler , and m. d. lukin , phys . lett * 91 * , 090402 ( 2003 ) . d. petrosyan , b. schmidt , j. r. anglin , and m. fleischhauer , phys . a * 76 * , 033606 ( 2007 ) . t. miyakawa and p. meystre , j. low . phys * 148 * , 429 ( 2007 ) . m. khl , h. moritz , t. stferle , k. gnter , and t. esslinger , phys . lett . * 94 * , 080403 ( 2005 ) . the fit was performed for @xmath407 and @xmath408 , and the sum in ( [ eq:2nd_order_shift ] ) was taken over the lowest 35 bands . d. b. m. dickerscheid , u. al khawaja , d. van oosten , and h. t. t. c. stoof , phys . a * 71 * , 043604 ( 2005 ) . k. b. gubbels , d. b. m. dickerscheid , and h. t. c. stoof , new . j. phys * 8 * , 151 ( 2006 ) . r. b. diener and t .- l . ho , phys . rev . lett . * 96 * , 010402 ( 2006 ) . s. drr , t. volz , and g. rempe , phys . a * 70 * , 031601(r ) ( 2004 ) . this fit was performed for @xmath409 and @xmath410 , and the contribution from the first 35 bands were included in ( [ eq : sigma_m_higher ] ) . Abstract:
[ "we analyze the scattering and bound state physics of a pair of atoms in a one - dimensional optical lattice interacting via a narrow feshbach resonance . the lattice provides a structured continuum allowing for the existence of bound dimer states both below and above the continuum bands , with pairs above the continuum stabilized by either repulsive interactions or their center of mass motion . inside the band the feshbach coupling to a closed channel bound state leads to a fano resonance profile for the transmission , which may be mapped out by rf- or photodissociative spectroscopy . we generalize the scattering length concept to the one - dimensional lattice , where a scattering length may be defined at both the lower and the upper continuum thresholds . as a function of the applied magnetic field the scattering length at either band edge exhibits the usual feshbach divergence when a bound state enters or exits the continuum . near the scattering length divergences the binding energy and wavefunction of the weakly bound dimer state acquires a universal form reminiscent of those of free - space feshbach molecules . we give numerical examples of our analytic results for a specific feshbach resonance , which has been studied experimentally ." ]
13,145
13,145
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: collective phenomena in systems far from thermal equilibrium have been of considerable interest in recent years @xcite . unlike systems in thermal equilibrium where the gibbs picture provides a theoretical framework within which such phenomena can be studied , here no such framework exists and one has to resort to studies of specific models in order to gain some understanding of the phenomena involved . one class of such models is driven diffusive systems ( dds ) @xcite . driven by an external field these systems do not generically obey detailed balance so that the steady state has non - vanishing currents . theoretical studies of dds have revealed basic differences between systems in thermal equilibrium and systems far from thermal equilibrium . for example , it is well known that one dimensional ( @xmath0 ) systems in thermal equilibrium with short - range interactions do not exhibit phenomena such as phase transitions , spontaneous symmetry breaking ( ssb ) and phase separation ( except in the limit of zero temperature or in the context of long - range interactions ) @xcite . in contrast , some examples of noisy @xmath0 dds with local dynamics have been found to exhibit such phenomena . one example of a noisy system which exhibits ssb in @xmath0 is the asymmetric exclusion model of two types of charge studied in @xcite . in this model , two types of charge are biased to move in opposite directions on a @xmath0 lattice with open ends . the charges interact via a hard - core interaction , and are injected at one end of the lattice and ejected at the other end . this model is symmetric under the combined operations of charge conjugation and parity ( pc symmetry ) . however , this symmetry is broken in the steady state , where the currents of the two charges are not equal . the reason for symmetry breaking in this model lies to some extent in the open boundaries . other examples of models in which there is ssb in @xmath0 have also been found in the context of cellular automata @xcite and surface growth @xcite . in the latter , ssb was due to the fact that one of the rates for a local dynamical move in the models is zero . once this zero rate changes to a non - zero rate ssb disappears . a closely related problem to spontaneous symmetry breaking , is that of _ phase separation _ in @xmath0 noisy systems . this has been observed in driven diffusive models with inhomogeneities , such as defect sites @xcite or particles @xcite . in these models it has been found that macroscopic regions of high densities are formed near the defect , much like a high density of cars behind a slow car in a traffic jam @xcite . here the phase separation is triggered by the defects . it is of interest to study whether phase separation can occur in @xmath0 noisy homogeneous systems such as on a ring geometry with no defects , where _ all _ possible local transition rates which are consistent with the symmetry and conservation laws of the model are non vanishing . recently , lahiri and ramaswamy have introduced a lattice model in the context of sedimenting colloidal crystals , where phase separation is found to take place without any inhomogeneities @xcite . in this model , there are two rings coupled to each other and particles on each ring undergo an asymmetric exclusion process . the hopping rate between sites @xmath1 and @xmath2 on each ring depends on the occupation at the @xmath1th site on the other ring . however , this model is studied mainly using monte carlo simulations and no analytical results are available so far . in a recent letter @xcite we introduced a simple three - species driven diffusive model exhibiting phase separation and spontaneous breaking of the translational symmetry on a ring . in the model nearest - neighbor particles exchange with given rates and the numbers of each species are conserved under the dynamics . the rates of all local dynamical moves that obey the conservation laws are non zero . an argument indicating that generically the system phase separates , thus breaking the translational invariance , was given for the case when none of the species of particle has zero density . in the special case of equal number of particles of each type , it was shown that the local dynamics obeys detailed balance with respect to a long - range asymmetric ( chiral ) hamiltonian . in this special case , using the hamiltonian , we have found the steady state of the model exactly and have been able to prove the existence of phase separation analytically . the existence of a hamiltonian for this special case is of interest in the light of speculation that non - equilibrium systems exhibiting generic long - range correlations might be described by effective hamiltonians containing long - range interactions @xcite . here we explicitly demonstrate that for the special case where the three densities are equal the model is exactly described by a long - range asymmetric hamiltonian . the model not only has long - range correlations but has generic long - range _ order_. the mechanism found in this study suggests that systems with dynamical rules defined completely locally and _ a priori _ without respect to any hamiltonian , may have a steady state where the configuration space is sampled according to a measure that is intrinsically global . the hamiltonian also allows us to identify the analog of a temperature in the microscopic dynamics as related to the drive of the system ; for zero drive , that is symmetric diffusion of the particles , the effective temperature is infinite and phase separation is lost . we note that a related but distinct three - species model has recently been introduced by arndt _ et al_. this model also exhibits phase separation@xcite . in the present work we analyze in detail the @xmath3 species model which was introduced in @xcite and then generalize it to larger @xmath4 . we provide the complete proof of phase separation which follows from the exact calculation of the partition sum in the thermodynamic limit . we also provide numerical evidence of phase separation in the general case where the densities of the three particles are not equal . in order to study the coarsening process monte - carlo simulations are performed . however , simulation of the microscopic model is hampered by slow dynamics which makes it difficult to access the scaling regime . the system becomes trapped in metastable states comprising several domains of each type of particle . the number of metastable states is exponentially large in the system size . the lifetimes of the metastable states increase exponentially with the average domain size as the fully phase separated state is approached . thus the model provides an example of slow dynamics in a system without any quenched disorder @xcite . to ameliorate the difficulty of numerically studying such slow dynamics we employ a toy model wherein it is the domains that are updated rather than the individual particles this allows the long - time scaling behavior of the domain size to be investigated and to confirm a logarithmic growth of the average domain size with time . the toy model also affords a mean - field solution for the long - time dynamical behavior , that again confirms the scaling behavior . returning to the case of equal numbers of particles of different species it is of interest to investigate the steady - state behavior in finite - size systems . we have found it convenient to do this by employing a matrix product technique previously used to solve the steady state of asymmetric exclusion processes @xcite . however , in the case of three species the simplest form of this technique @xcite is applicable only to a limited class of systems @xcite . for the present model we generalize the matrix product to a product of rank 6 tensors and write the steady state by taking an appropriate contraction . the partition sum and steady - state correlation functions can be conveniently computed numerically using this tensor product ansatz . the paper is organized as follows : in section ii we define the model introduced in @xcite and we present an argument which indicates that the system should phase separate as long as none of the species of particles has zero density . in section iii we study the special case where the model satisfies detailed balance and explicitly write down the steady - state weight for the three - species model . the existence of phase separation in the model for any non - infinite temperature is proved analytically by calculating some bounds on the two - point correlation functions . section iv contains numerical evidence for phase separation in the general case where the densities of the three species of particles are not equal . the toy model , which facilitates efficient monte carlo simulations , is used to study the dynamics of phase separation . a mean - field analysis of this toy model is presented , the details being left to appendix a. in section v we present results for finite systems obtained via the tensor product ansatz . using these results we study finite - size scaling in the system . in section vi we address phase separation in systems with more than three species of particle and a proof of detailed balance for special cases is given in appendix b. we conclude in section vii and discuss some open questions . we start by defining a three - species model which exhibits phase separation in @xmath0 . consider a one - dimensional , ring - like ( periodic ) lattice of length @xmath5 where each site is occupied by one of the three types of particles , @xmath6 , @xmath7 , or @xmath8 . the model evolves under a random sequential update procedure which is defined as follows : at each time step two neighboring sites are chosen randomly and the particles at these sites are exchanged according to the following rates @xmath9 the particles thus diffuse asymmetrically around the ring . the dynamics conserves the number of particles , @xmath10 and @xmath11 of the three species . the @xmath12 case is special . here the diffusion is symmetric and every local exchange of particles takes place with the same rate as the reverse move . the system thus obeys detailed balance reaching a steady state in which all microscopic configurations ( compatible with the number of particles @xmath10 and @xmath11 ) are equally probable . this state is homogeneous , and no phase separation takes place . we now present a simple argument suggesting that for @xmath13 the steady state of the system is not homogeneous in the thermodynamic limit . for simplicity the case @xmath14 is examined . as a result of the bias in the exchange rates an @xmath6 particle prefers to move to the left inside a @xmath7 domain and to the right inside a @xmath8 domain . similarly the motion of @xmath7 and @xmath8 particles in foreign domains is biased . consider the dynamics starting from a random initial configuration . the configuration is composed of a random sequence of domains of @xmath6 , @xmath7 , and @xmath8 particles . due to the bias a local configuration in which an @xmath6 domain is placed to the right of a @xmath7 domain is unstable and the two domains exchange places on a relatively short time scale which is linear in the domain size . similarly , @xmath15 and @xmath16 domains are unstable too . on the other hand @xmath17 , @xmath18 and @xmath19 configurations are stable and long lived . thus after a relatively short time the system reaches a state of the type @xmath20 in which @xmath21 and @xmath8 domains are located to the right of @xmath22 and @xmath7 domains , respectively . the evolution of this state takes place via a slow diffusion process in which , for example , the time scale for an @xmath6 particle to cross an adjacent @xmath7 domain is @xmath23 , where @xmath24 is the size of the @xmath7 domain . the system therefore coarsens and the average domain size increases with time as @xmath25 @xcite . eventually the system phase separates into three domains of the three species of the form @xmath26 . in a finite system the phase separated state may further evolve and become disordered due to fluctuations . however , the time scale for this to happen grows exponentially with the system size . for example it would take a time of order of @xmath27 for the @xmath6 domain in the totally phase separated state to break up into smaller domains . hence in the thermodynamic limit , this time scale diverges and the phase separated state remains stable provided the density of each species is non - zero . note that there are always small fluctuations about a totally phase separated state . however , these fluctuations affect the densities only near the domain boundaries . they result in a finite width for the domain walls . the fact that any phase separated state is stable for a time exponentially long in the system size amounts to a breaking of the translational symmetry . since the exchange rates are asymmetric , the system generically supports a particle current in the steady state . to see this , consider the @xmath6 domain in the phase separated state . an @xmath6 particle near the @xmath28 boundary can traverse the entire @xmath7 domain to the right with an effective rate proportional to @xmath29 . once it crosses the @xmath7 domain it will move through the @xmath8 domain with rate @xmath30 . similarly an @xmath6 particle near the @xmath31 boundary can traverse the entire @xmath8 domain to the left with a rate proportional to @xmath32 . once the domain is crossed it moves through the @xmath7 domain with rate @xmath30 . hence the net @xmath6 particle current is of the order of @xmath33 . since this current is exponentially small in system size , it vanishes in the thermodynamic limit . for the case of @xmath34 , this argument suggests that the current is strictly zero for any @xmath5 . in sections iii and v we study this case in detail . the arguments presented above suggesting phase separation for @xmath35 may be easily extended to @xmath36 . in this case , however , the phase separated state is @xmath37 rather than @xmath38 . this may be seen by noting that the dynamical rules are invariant under the transformation @xmath39 together with @xmath40 . in this section we show that the dynamics ( [ eq : dynamics ] ) , for the special case @xmath34 , satisfies detailed balance . the corresponding hamiltonian , which determines the steady - state distribution , is found to have long - range asymmetric interactions . using this hamiltonian , we calculate analytically the partition sum and bounds on the correlation functions in the thermodynamic limit . these are then used to prove the existence of phase separation in the model . later , in section [ matrixans ] we study finite systems for this case and the approach to the thermodynamic limit . the general argument presented in the previous section suggests that for the special case @xmath34 , the steady state carries no current for any system size . we demonstrate this explicitly by showing that the _ local dynamics _ of the model satisfies detailed balance with respect to a _ long - range asymmetric _ hamiltonian @xmath41 . we define the occupation variables @xmath42 and @xmath43 as follows : @xmath44 the variables @xmath45 and @xmath43 are defined similarly . clearly the relation @xmath46 is satisfied . a microscopic configuration is thus described by a set @xmath47 . using these variables , we will show that the hamiltonian @xmath41 and the steady - state distribution @xmath48 corresponding to the dynamics ( [ eq : dynamics ] ) for the case @xmath49 are given by @xmath50 \ ; , \ ] ] @xmath51 here @xmath52 is the partition sum given by @xmath53 , where the sum is over all configurations in which @xmath34 . note that the hamiltonian @xmath41 does not determine the dynamics of the system , it just governs the steady - state distribution as given in ( [ eq : hamilton ] ) and ( [ eq : weight ] ) . ( [ eq : weight ] ) suggests that @xmath54 serves as a temperature variable with @xmath55 . thus , @xmath56 is the infinite - temperature limit . the hamiltonian ( [ eq : hamilton ] ) is written in a form which is not manifestly translationally invariant . however , careful examination reveals that when the relation @xmath34 is taken into account , the hamiltonian as given by ( [ eq : hamilton ] ) is indeed translationally invariant ( see appendix b ) . therefore site @xmath57 may be chosen arbitrarily . an expression for @xmath41 which is manifestly translationally invariant will be derived at the end of this section . note that @xmath58 since the lhs yields the number of @xmath19 ( and @xmath15 ) pairs in the system . using this relation the hamiltonian may also be written in a form where the cyclic symmetry is more apparent : @xmath59-(n/3)^2 \ ; .\ ] ] the proof of eqs . ( [ eq : hamilton],[eq : weight ] ) is straightforward . this is done by considering a nearest - neighbor particle exchange and verifying that detailed balance is satisfied with respect to ( [ eq : weight ] ) . we start by considering nearest - neighbor sites in the interior of the lattice , namely pairs other than @xmath60 . for example consider the exchange @xmath61 taking place at two adjacent sites @xmath62 and @xmath63 , where @xmath64 . this exchange results in the contribution of one more @xmath65 term in @xmath66 and hence the energy of the resulting configuration is higher by @xmath57 . it is easy to see using eq . ( [ eq : weight ] ) that @xmath67 , as required by detailed balance . similar relations are easily derived for exchange of @xmath18 and @xmath19 pairs . now consider an exchange taking place between sites @xmath5 and @xmath57 , say @xmath68 . according to ( [ eq : hamilton ] ) this exchange costs an energy of @xmath69 . therefore the exchange satisfies the detailed balance condition @xmath70 only when @xmath71 . similarly , by considering the exchanges @xmath72 and @xmath73 , one deduces that the detailed balance condition is satisfied for any exchange at sites @xmath5 and @xmath57 as long as @xmath34 . in appendix b we consider the most general nearest - neighbor exchange rates for @xmath4 species and arbitrary densities and derive conditions ( [ condition ] ) for exchange rates which satisfy detailed balance . to write @xmath41 in a manifestly translationally invariant form we define @xmath74 as the hamiltonian in which site @xmath75 is the origin . namely , @xmath76 \ ; , \ ] ] where the summation over @xmath1 and @xmath77 is modulo @xmath5 . summing ( [ hi0 ] ) over all @xmath75 and dividing by @xmath5 , one obtains , @xmath78 where in the summation the value of the site index @xmath79 is modulo @xmath5 . in the hamiltonian ( [ eq : h_tinvar ] ) the interaction is linear in the distance between the particles , and thus is long - ranged . the distance is measured in a preferred direction from site @xmath1 to site @xmath80 . moreover it is asymmetric in the sense that @xmath66 is not invariant under the parity operation . it is also related to chiral hamiltonians @xcite . before proceeding further to evaluate the partition sum and some correlation functions associated with the hamiltonian ( [ eq : hamilton ] ) let us make a few observations . the ground state of the hamiltonian is given by the fully separated state @xmath81 and its translationally related states . the degeneracy of the ground state is thus @xmath5 and its energy is zero . a simple way of evaluating the energy of an arbitrary configuration is obtained by noting that nearest - neighbor ( nn ) exchanges @xmath82 and @xmath83 cost one unit of energy each while the reverse exchanges result in an energy gain of one unit . the energy of an arbitrary configuration may thus be evaluated by starting with the ground state and performing nn exchanges until the configuration is reached , keeping track of the energy changes at each step of the way . the highest energy is @xmath84 and it corresponds to the totally phase separated configuration @xmath85 and its @xmath5 translations . in considering the excited states of the hamiltonian ( [ eq : hamilton ] ) we note that the model exhibits a set of metastable states which correspond to local minima of the energy : any exchange of nn particles results in an increase of the energy . in these states no @xmath86 and @xmath15 nn pairs exist ; only @xmath87 and @xmath19 nn pairs may be found in addition to @xmath88 , @xmath89 , and @xmath90 . any metastable state is thus composed of a sequence of domains in which @xmath21 and @xmath8 domains follow @xmath22 and @xmath7 domains , respectively . therefore each metastable state has an equal number of domains , @xmath91 , of each type with @xmath92 . the @xmath93 case corresponds to the ground state while @xmath94 corresponds to the @xmath95 state , composed of a total of @xmath5 domains each of length @xmath57 . ( the total number of domains in an @xmath91-state is @xmath96 . ) for calculating the free energy and some correlation functions corresponding to the hamiltonian ( [ eq : hamilton ] ) we find it useful to first derive some bounds for the number @xmath97 of @xmath91-states and their energies . in the following such bounds are presented . they are then used , in the next section , to evaluate the free energy and correlation functions of the model . to obtain a bound for @xmath97 we note that the number of ways of dividing @xmath98 @xmath6 particles into @xmath91 domains is @xmath99 . the number of ways of combining @xmath91 divisions of each of the three types of particles is clearly @xmath100 ^ 3 $ ] . there are at most @xmath5 ways of placing this string of domains on a lattice to obtain a metastable state ( the number of ways need not be equal to @xmath5 since the string may possess some translational symmetry ) . one therefore has @xmath101 ^ 3 \le{\cal n}(s ) \le n \left[{n/3 - 1}\choose { s-1}\right]^3\ ; . \label{nmss}\ ] ] thus , the total number of metastable states is exponential in @xmath5 . we now consider the energy of the metastable states . it is easy to convince oneself that among all @xmath91-states , none has energy lower than the following configuration , @xmath102 where the @xmath103 rightmost domains are of size @xmath57 and the three leftmost domains are of size @xmath104 each . the energy of this state , @xmath105 satisfies the following recursion relation @xmath106 with @xmath107 . to see this one notes that the @xmath91-state may be created from the @xmath108-state by first moving a @xmath7 particle from the leftmost @xmath7 domain across @xmath109 @xmath8 particles to the right and then moving an @xmath6 particle from the leftmost @xmath6 domain to the right across the adjacent @xmath7 and @xmath8 domains . the energy cost of these moves is @xmath109 , yielding ( [ rr ] ) . the recursion relation ( [ rr ] ) , together with @xmath110 , is then readily solved to give @xmath111 the energy of all metastable @xmath91-states is larger or equal to @xmath105 as given by eq.([emss ] ) . in the following section we use the bounds ( [ nmss ] ) and ( [ emss ] ) to calculate the partition sum and some correlation functions corresponding to the hamiltonian ( [ eq : hamilton ] ) . in this section we prove that , in the large @xmath5 limit and for all @xmath35 , the partition sum is given by @xmath112 ^ 3 \ ; , \label{psum}\ ] ] where @xmath113 the partition sum for @xmath36 may be obtained by replacing @xmath54 by @xmath114 in ( [ psum ] ) . note that the partition sum is linear and not exponential in @xmath5 , meaning that the free energy is not extensive . this is a result of the long - range interaction in the hamiltonian and the fact that the energy excitations are localized near the domain boundaries , as will be shown in the following . for @xmath54 close to @xmath57 , @xmath115 has an essential singularity , @xmath116}\;.\ ] ] this suggests that extensivity of the free energy could be restored in the double limit @xmath117 and @xmath118 with @xmath119 finite . this scaling behavior is only suggestive since expression ( [ psum ] ) may not be valid in this limit . for @xmath12 all configurations with @xmath34 are equally probable , so that the partition sum is given by @xmath120 which goes like @xmath121 for large @xmath5 . it is instructive to first present the proof of ( [ psum ] ) for small values of @xmath54 . this proof will then serve as the basis for the proof for any @xmath35 . we start by noting that in calculating the partition sum ( [ psum ] ) , configurations with energy larger then @xmath122 ( @xmath123 ) may be neglected in the thermodynamic limit . for simplicity we first demonstrate this for @xmath124 , although later we show it for any @xmath35 . the contribution to the partition sum from these energy states , @xmath125 , is given by @xmath126 where @xmath127 is the number of configurations of energy @xmath128 . clearly , the number of possible configurations in the system is bounded crudely from above by @xmath121 . this bound implies @xmath129 thus , for @xmath124 , the contribution to the partition sum arising from energies larger than @xmath122 is exponentially small in @xmath5 and may be neglected in the thermodynamic limit . the calculation of @xmath52 is thus reduced to calculating a truncated partition sum in which only energies up to @xmath122 are summed over . to proceed we consider @xmath130 and take into account configurations with energy less than @xmath131 . this simplifies the calculations considerably since all configurations with energy @xmath132 may be decomposed into @xmath5 disjoint sets of states , each corresponding to a unique ground state ( see previous section for a discussion of ground states ) . we label the sets by @xmath133 , the position of the rightmost @xmath6 particle in the @xmath6 domain of the ground state belonging to the set ( see fig . [ ground ] for an example of an @xmath134 ground state ) . each state in a specific set can be obtained from the corresponding ground state by exchanging nearest neighbors so that the energy always increases along the intermediate states . note that this is correct only if excitations of energy less than @xmath131 are considered . this is because not all higher energy states can be reached by uphill steps from a ground state . thus , using translational invariance , the partition sum can be written as @xmath135 where @xmath136 is the truncated partition sum of one of the @xmath5 sets of configurations . we proceed to calculate @xmath136 . this is done by considering all the possible energy excitations with energy less than @xmath131 above one ground state . consider a specific domain boundary , say @xmath17 . excitations of energy @xmath128 at this boundary can be created by moving one or more @xmath6 particles into the @xmath7 domain ( this is equivalent to moving @xmath7 particles into the @xmath6 domain ) . an @xmath6 particle moving into the @xmath7 domain is considered as a walker . the excitation energy increases linearly with the distance the walker has moved . thus , in this picture an excitation of energy @xmath128 is created by @xmath137 walkers , traveling a total distance @xmath128 . the number of excitations of energy @xmath128 is then given by the number of ways , @xmath138 , of partitioning an integer @xmath128 into the sum of a sequence of non - increasing positive integers . taking into account excitations at all three boundaries , an excitation of energy @xmath128 in the system is created by three independent excitations of energy @xmath139 and @xmath140 at the different domain boundaries such that @xmath141 . the number of excitations of this form is just given by @xmath142 . thus , @xmath136 is given by @xmath143 taking the thermodynamic limit we obtain @xmath144 using a well known result from number theory , attributed to euler , for the generating function of @xmath138 @xcite , @xmath145 and using ( [ thelim ] ) and ( [ exp ] ) , eq.([psum ] ) is obtained . so far we have proved that for @xmath146 , eq.([psum ] ) is exact in the thermodynamic limit . we now extend these results for any @xmath35 . first we have to show that the states ignored in the previous calculation for @xmath146 may be ignored for all @xmath35 . to do this we calculate upper and lower bounds on @xmath52 and show they converge for large enough @xmath5 . for this we have to consider the entire energy spectrum of the hamiltonian . any configuration of the system which is neither a ground state nor a metastable state can be obtained from at least one ground state ( @xmath93 ) or a metastable state ( @xmath147 ) as follows : starting from this @xmath91-state exchange nearest neighbors such that the energy always increases along the path until the configuration is reached . in what follows it is demonstrated that none of the configurations which can be obtained from @xmath91-states , with @xmath147 , by the above procedure of particle exchange , contributes to the partition sum in the thermodynamic limit . an upper bound on the partition sum may be calculated as follows : using the same steps of derivation used for computing @xmath136 , it is straightforward to show that the contribution to the partition sum from an @xmath91-state and associated configurations is _ at most _ @xmath148^{-3s}$ ] . the prefactor @xmath149 arises from the minimum energy ( [ emss ] ) of this metastable state . therefore by considering the contributions from all the @xmath91-states and using ( [ nmeta ] ) the following bound is found @xmath150 ^ 3 + \sum_{s=2}^{n/3}n { n/3 - 1\choose s-1 } q^{(s-1)n/3 -s(s-1)/2 } [ ( q_{\infty})]^{-3s}\;. \label{zupperb1}\ ] ] the second term on the rhs represents the contribution from excitations around the metastable states . replacing @xmath151 by an upper bound @xmath152 one can sum the binomial series . the resulting expression is exponentially small in @xmath5 for any @xmath35 . a lower bound on @xmath52 can be calculated by neglecting configurations with energy greater than @xmath131 as follows , @xmath153 ^ 3 - n \sum_{m = n/3 - 1}^{\infty}q^m\sum_{m_i=0}^mp(m_1)p(m_2)p(m_3)\delta_{m_1+m_2+m_3,m } \\ & > & n/[(q)_{\infty}]^3 - n \sum_{m = n/3 - 1}^{\infty}q^m ( mp(m))^3 \ ; . \label{lowbound}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the asymptotic behavior of @xmath138 @xcite is given by @xmath154 thus , for large @xmath5 the lower bound ( [ lowbound ] ) converges to ( [ psum ] ) as does the upper bound ( [ zupperb1 ] ) . whether or not a system has long - range order in the steady state can be found by studying the decay of two - point density correlation functions . for example the probability of finding an @xmath6 particle at site @xmath1 and a @xmath7 particle at site @xmath77 is , @xmath155 where the summation is over all configurations @xmath156 in which @xmath34 . due to symmetry many of the correlation functions will be the same , for example @xmath157 . a sufficient condition for the existence of phase separation is @xmath158 since @xmath159 we wish to show that @xmath160 . in fact we will show below that for any given @xmath161 and for sufficiently large @xmath5 , @xmath162 this result not only demonstrates that there is phase separation , but also that each of the domains is pure . namely the probability of finding a particle a large distance inside a domain of particles of another type is vanishingly small in the thermodynamic limit . to prove eq . ( [ corrf3 ] ) , we use the relation @xmath163 , and show that the correlation function @xmath164 is of @xmath165 and @xmath166 is of @xmath167 . here we show only the proof for @xmath164 , since the proof of @xmath166 is similar . we also restrict ourselves to @xmath168 , which is sufficient for proving eq . ( [ corrf3 ] ) . we have already seen that the contribution to the partition sum from the metastable states and excitations above them are exponentially small in the system size and hence may be neglected . therefore , for calculating the correlation function it is sufficient to consider the @xmath5 ground states and excitations above them which may be reached by moves which only increase the energy . as we have seen , these states form @xmath5 disjoint sets of states , each associated with one of the ground states . using this we now show that @xmath169 . for this purpose we use a restricted partition sum @xmath170 , which is defined as the partition sum @xmath136 calculated with the constraint that one of the walkers , say of type @xmath6 , has traveled at least distance @xmath91 . it is given as @xmath171 by @xmath172 here @xmath173 is the number of partitions of integer @xmath128 with the constraint that in all the partitions the integer @xmath91 occurs at least once . noting that @xmath174 it is easy to show that @xmath175 where @xmath176 . we now proceed to derive a bound for @xmath177 . recall that @xmath24 is the position of the rightmost @xmath6 particle in the @xmath6 domain in the ground state labeled @xmath24 . if we define @xmath178 as the correlation function calculated within the set of states labeled @xmath24 , we can write @xmath179 up to exponentially small corrections in the system size . for convenience we break the summation over @xmath24 into @xmath180 sums according to the values of @xmath181 and @xmath182 in the ground state . these @xmath180 parts correspond to ( i ) ground states where @xmath183 ; ( ii ) ground states where @xmath184 ; ( iii ) ground states where @xmath185 and ( iv ) ground states where @xmath186 . we now consider each of them in detail and give an upper bound for @xmath187 in each case . \(i ) _ ground states where @xmath183 _ : in this case the site @xmath57 is inside the @xmath6 domain and site @xmath161 is inside the @xmath7 domain . since we consider only @xmath168 , these states correspond to the @xmath24 ground states with @xmath188 . using the fact that @xmath189 one finds @xmath190 ( ii ) _ ground states where @xmath184 _ : in principle site @xmath161 might be either inside the @xmath6 domain or inside the @xmath8 domain . however , since site @xmath57 is in the @xmath6 domain and we consider only @xmath191 , site @xmath161 must be in the @xmath6 domain . the ground states @xmath24 for which this takes place satisfy @xmath192 . clearly , only the excited states where @xmath193 contribute to @xmath187 . in such excited states one of the @xmath7 walkers travels at least a distance @xmath194 into the @xmath6 domain ( see fig . [ a10bk1 ] ) . for this case we can give the upper bound @xmath195 . from eq . ( [ psums1 ] ) , @xmath196 . hence , @xmath197 \(iii ) _ ground states where @xmath185 _ : again , since @xmath168 site @xmath57 has to be inside the @xmath7 domain . the values of @xmath24 satisfying this condition are in the range @xmath198 . in this case only excited states in which one of the @xmath6 walkers travels at least a distance @xmath199 into the @xmath7 domain will contribute to @xmath200 . hence we can use the upper bound @xmath201 , in this case . therefore , @xmath202 \(iv ) _ ground states where @xmath186 _ : there are three possibilities here . @xmath203 site @xmath57 is inside the @xmath8 domain and site @xmath161 is inside the @xmath6 domain ( @xmath204 ) , @xmath205 both the sites @xmath57 and @xmath161 are inside the @xmath8 domain ( @xmath206 ) , @xmath207 site @xmath57 inside the @xmath7 domain and site @xmath161 inside the @xmath8 domain ( @xmath208 ) . since all these are consistent with @xmath209 , all these cases can occur . it can be shown that the minimal energy needed to create an excited state where @xmath210 and @xmath193 is @xmath211 for the case @xmath203 , @xmath212 for the case @xmath205 and @xmath213 for the case @xmath207 . the resulting expression for the bound is @xmath214 the summations on the rhs of eqs . ( [ ubound2]-[ubound4 ] ) can be carried out explicitly . to leading order , the summations gives @xmath215 for each of eqs . ( [ ubound2 ] ) and ( [ ubound3 ] ) . the summation on the rhs of eq . ( [ ubound4 ] ) vanishes exponentially in the thermodynamic limit . using eqs . ( [ a1br]-[ubound3 ] ) , we get the following expression for the upper bound on @xmath216 @xmath217 \;.\ ] ] therefore @xmath218 . similarly one can show that @xmath219 . thus for all @xmath35 , @xmath220 , proving the existence of a complete phase separation . we have demonstrated that in the thermodynamic limit the system is phase separated when @xmath34 . the general arguments given in section ii indicate that when the global densities of the three species are non - vanishing and @xmath221 , the system phase separates , even when the three densities are not equal . the argument suggests that the typical time , @xmath222 , in which the system leaves a specific phase separated configuration increases exponentially with the system size . thus , a phase separated state is stable in the thermodynamic limit . in the following we use monte carlo simulations to support these arguments . the time , @xmath222 , can be measured using the auto - correlation function defined as , @xmath223 where @xmath224 and @xmath225 are the values of the occupation variables @xmath42 and @xmath43 at time @xmath226 , and @xmath227 denotes an average over histories of evolution . clearly , @xmath228 while @xmath229 , the value of the autocorrelation between two independent configurations . thus , @xmath222 may be defined as the decay time of @xmath230 to @xmath231 when at @xmath232 the system is totally phase separated . we have measured the time scale @xmath222 using monte carlo simulations for different system sizes for @xmath34 and for @xmath233 for several @xmath54 values . an example of such measurements for @xmath234 , @xmath235 and @xmath236 is presented in fig . [ fig_corrt ] . in the plot @xmath222 is plotted versus system size for several values of @xmath54 . it agrees with the exponential growth of @xmath222 with the system size suggested by the simple argument of section ii . the same behavior seems to occur for all @xmath237 and different choices of @xmath238 , @xmath239 and @xmath240 . therefore we conclude that the monte carlo simulations support the claim that for any @xmath241 the system will phase separate into three domains in the thermodynamic limit , even when the number of particles of each species is not equal . in the thermodynamic limit the translational symmetry is spontaneously broken in this state . due to the slow dynamics , which reflects escape from metastable states , monte carlo simulations could be performed only for relatively small system size ( @xmath242 ) . in order to study the coarsening process for larger systems we employ , in the following , a toy model which mimics the dynamics of the model ( [ eq : dynamics ] ) . the toy model can be conveniently simulated for systems larger by about two orders of magnitude . we now construct a simple toy model which captures the essential physics of the coarsening process in the model at large times and enables us to simulate systems much larger than those accessible by monte carlo simulation . using the toy model we examine another characteristic scale of the system . namely , the average domain size @xmath243 as a function of the time @xmath226 . the results support the simple argument leading to a domain growth law @xmath244 . a mean - field version of the toy model is then solved analytically . we consider a system at time @xmath226 such that the average domain size , @xmath243 , is much larger than the domain wall width . at these time scales , the domain walls can be taken as sharp and we may consider only events which modify the size of domains . this means that the dynamics of the system can be approximated by considering only the movement of particles between neighboring domains of the same species . using this we represent a configuration by a sequence of domains of the form @xmath245 , where the @xmath1th domain of , say @xmath6 , particles is represented by @xmath246 , as shown in fig . [ fig_toy1 ] . the exchange of particles between domains , say @xmath247 and @xmath248 , takes place at a rate dictated by the size of the domains @xmath249 and @xmath250 which separate them . since intermediate configurations of the form @xmath251 rearrange on short time scales compared with the evolution between metastable states , only metastable configurations are considered in the toy model . events in which a domain splits into two are ignored . using these ideas we define the dynamics of the toy model as follows : at each time step two neighboring domains of the same species of particle are chosen randomly , say @xmath246 and @xmath252 . let @xmath253 , @xmath254 and @xmath255 denote the lengths of the domains @xmath256 and @xmath257 respectively . the length of the domain chosen is then modified by carrying out one of the following processes : @xmath258{ll } \left . \begin{array}[]{ll } 1 ) & a_i \rightarrow a_i - 1 \\ & a_{i+1}\rightarrow a_{i+1 } + 1 \\ \end{array } \right\ } & { \rm with~rate } \quad q^{b_i } \\ & \\ \left . \begin{array}[]{ll } 2 ) & a_i \rightarrow a_i + 1 \\ & a_{i+1}\rightarrow a_{i+1 } - 1 \\ \end{array } \right\ } & { \rm with~rate } \quad q^{c_i } \\ \end{array}\ ] ] where , as before , @xmath14 is considered . if @xmath253 becomes zero , then delete the domain @xmath246 from the list of domains , and merge @xmath259 and @xmath257 with @xmath260 and @xmath261 , respectively . then for @xmath262 , shift the indices of the domains from @xmath77 to @xmath263 , so that @xmath264 becomes @xmath265 . the rules for updating @xmath266 and @xmath267 domains can be obtained from ( [ toy_rule ] ) using cyclic permutations and a slight change of indices . note that the toy model is only relevant to the description of the coarsening dynamics . this is because here , once the system is left with three domains , it remains in that state . to simulate the toy model efficiently , an algorithm suitable for rare event dynamics must be used due to the small rate of events @xcite . we use an algorithm which is performed by repeating the following steps : 1 . list all possible events @xmath268 and assign to them rates @xmath269 according to the rules of the model . 2 . choose an event @xmath128 with probability @xmath270 where @xmath271 . advance time by @xmath272 , where @xmath273 . the algorithm would be equivalent to a usual monte carlo simulation , where @xmath57 time step is equivalent to one monte carlo sweep , if in step @xmath274 , @xmath275 would be drawn from a poisson distribution @xmath276 $ ] . however , here we make an approximation by using the deterministic choice @xmath277 . we have simulated the dynamics for lattices of size up to @xmath278 . for simplicity we consider the case @xmath34 . an example of a typical behavior of the average domain size as a function of @xmath226 is shown in fig . [ fig_domsize ] . one can see that after an initial transient growth time the data fits very well with a @xmath279 behavior . simulations for different @xmath54 values indicate that , @xmath280 with @xmath281 . the toy model enables one to verify the scaling behavior ( [ loga ] ) and estimate the constant @xmath282 . this would be very difficult to do by simulation of the full model ( [ eq : dynamics ] ) . here we present the solution of a mean - field version of the toy model based on ideas presented by rutenberg and bray @xcite and derrida _ et al._@xcite in the study of the ordering dynamics in a one - dimensional scalar model . to construct the mean - field model we notice that since all steps in the toy model which involve exchange of particles between domains occur at a rate exponentially small in the size of domains , one can consider a model where dynamics occurs only in the vicinity of the smallest domains . the mean field approximation assumes that different domains are uncorrelated and does not distinguish between domains of different species . the second assumption relaxes the conservation of particles of each species . thus , in contrast to the systems studied by @xcite and @xcite we do not expect the mean field to become exact in the scaling limit . we define the mean - field model as follows : 1 . pick one of the smallest domains @xmath283 . 2 . pick @xmath284 domains @xmath285 and @xmath286 randomly and treat them as the neighbors of @xmath283 . 3 . pick @xmath274 more domains randomly say , @xmath287 and @xmath288 . 4 . eliminate @xmath289 and @xmath290 from the system and change the length of the domains @xmath287 and @xmath288 by @xmath291 steps @xmath57 to @xmath180 are performed simultaneously for all of the smallest domains in the system . here @xmath292 is the length of domain @xmath1 , and @xmath293 is the length of the smallest domain . steps @xmath57 to @xmath274 choose the smallest domain @xmath283 and its nearest neighbors ( see fig . [ fig_toy2 ] ) . step @xmath180 uses the fact that the dynamics occur in the model only in the vicinity of the smallest domain and eliminates the three domains @xmath283 , @xmath294 and @xmath295 joining them appropriately with the other domains @xmath296 , @xmath297 and @xmath298 . note that this mean - field dynamics does not take into account the time taken for these events to happen . this will be done later when we derive the growth law of domains . to solve the mean - field model we follow the method used in @xcite . let @xmath299 be the number of domains of size @xmath24 , irrespective of the type of particle it consists of . let @xmath300 be the length of the smallest domain and @xmath301 be the total number of domains at time @xmath226 . we will assume that @xmath299 has the following scaling form in the large - time limit . @xmath302 a solution of the model given in appendix [ meanfield ] yields @xmath303 where @xmath304 is given by @xmath305 the growth law for @xmath306 can be derived following @xcite : after the elimination of the smallest domain , @xmath307 increases by @xmath57 . this happens at a rate @xmath308 , namely , the inverse time required by a typical domain to cross a distance @xmath309 ( thus , causing the annihilation of @xmath283 ) . using @xmath310 we write @xmath311 from this one can obtain the scaling form of the average domain size , @xmath312 note that in this eq . @xmath304 does not depend , according to the mean - field solution , on either @xmath226 or @xmath54 . one can see from ( [ sform ] ) that for large @xmath24 , @xmath313 which was confirmed by the simulations of the toy model where @xmath314 ( see ( [ loga ] ) ) . a numerical evaluation of ( [ avexpp ] ) yields @xmath315 as compared with @xmath316 obtained from the toy model simulations . in section iii the partition function , @xmath52 , and correlation function , @xmath317 for finite @xmath161 , have been calculated in the thermodynamic limit . it is also of interest to obtain results for finite systems for the study of finite - size effects and the approach to the thermodynamic limit . recently a matrix ansatz method has been introduced to study one - dimensional non - equilibrium systems @xcite . it has been shown that in certain three - species models the steady - state weight and correlation functions can be represented as a product of matrices @xcite . in the ansatz a specific matrix is associated with each type of particle . then the unnormalized probability of a certain configuration is obtained from a matrix product . the matrices corresponding to the different species of particles satisfy an algebra derived from the dynamics of the model . a scalar , _ i.e. _ the weight of a configuration or some correlation function , is usually obtained by performing a trace over the product of matrices , or by multiplying both sides of the product of matrices by vectors . generalizing this method to replace matrices by tensors @xcite , we have been able to obtain recursion relations for the partition function and correlation function for finite systems for the special case @xmath34 . the recursion relations are then used to obtain the partition function and correlation function @xmath318 for any @xmath161 in small systems . the results are used to study the scaling of the correlation function near the critical point @xmath12 ( infinite temperature ) , where the typical domain wall width diverges . it is convenient to consider the unnormalized weights , @xmath319 , defined through @xmath320 where @xmath321 is the probability of being in configuration @xmath322 . the partition sum @xmath52 is given by @xmath323 where the sum is over all configurations with @xmath34 . we generalize the matrix ansatz and construct the steady - state weight , @xmath324 , from a product of tensors each corresponding to a particle located in a specific place on the lattice . the contraction of the tensors yields a tensor which is then contracted with ` left ' and ` right ' tensors to generate a scalar . the three tensors which represent the different type of particle are defined as rank @xmath325 tensors through the following tensor products of square matrices @xmath326 here @xmath327 is a unit matrix . the matrices @xmath328 and @xmath329 will be chosen in what follows to satisfy a commutation relation which will be dictated by the detailed balance condition . to define @xmath324 we introduce the following notation : the contraction of two rank @xmath325 tensors @xmath330 and @xmath331 , where @xmath332 and @xmath333 are square matrices , according to the rule @xmath334 is denoted by @xmath335 . the contraction of a rank 6 tensor @xmath336 with a ` left ' rank @xmath274 tensor @xmath337 , where @xmath338 are transposed vectors , and a ` right ' rank @xmath274 tensor , @xmath339 , where @xmath340 are vectors , defined through @xmath341 is denoted by @xmath342 . using these definitions we write the steady - state weight of the system as @xmath343 \vert { \cal v } \rangle \ ; , \ ] ] where @xmath344 , @xmath45 and @xmath43 are the occupation variables defined in ( [ ocup ] ) . the expression states that a tensor @xmath345 is present at place @xmath1 in the tensor product if site @xmath1 is occupied by an @xmath6 particle , a tensor @xmath346 is present if site @xmath1 is occupied by a @xmath7 particle , and a tensor @xmath347 is present if site @xmath1 is occupied by a @xmath8 particle . the action of the tensor product on @xmath348 and @xmath349 ( to be specified later ) produces the scalar @xmath324 . it is straightforward to show using detailed balance that a necessary condition for eq . ( [ eq : ansatz ] ) to be the steady - state weight is that the following commutation relations are satisfied between @xmath350 , @xmath351 , and @xmath352 : @xmath353 using ( [ eq : tensors ] ) one can verify that these commutation relations are satisfied provided that @xmath354 . this deformed commutator is of relevance in other stochastic systems @xcite . a representation of the matrices @xmath328 and @xmath329 which satisfies this commutation relation can be obtained as follows : let @xmath355 denote a basis set ( @xmath356 ) forming a vector space . in this basis we choose the matrices so that , @xmath357 while for @xmath358 , @xmath359 . an explicit form for @xmath329 and @xmath328 is given by the following @xmath360 square matrices @xmath361 to obtain @xmath324 , @xmath362 and @xmath349 have to be specified . this should obviously be done so that @xmath324 is non - zero if the ansatz is to give a non - trivial result . we consider a general tensor product which corresponds to some configuration . the product has @xmath98 tensors of each type @xmath363 and @xmath352 , which results in a tensor product of three matrix products . using ( [ eq : tensors ] ) it can be seen that each matrix product contains @xmath98 matrices of each type @xmath328 , @xmath329 and @xmath327 . since @xmath329 and @xmath327 are diagonal , while @xmath328 acts to its left as a lowering matrix ( see ( [ eq : matrix ] ) ) , choosing @xmath364 , and @xmath365 will give a non - zero @xmath366 . this makes clear that the minimal size choice for the vector - spaces is @xmath367 . under this choice it is easy to see that in the ground states one has @xmath368 which corresponds to a ground state energy @xmath84 . however , the choice of @xmath369 and @xmath370 is determined only up to some multiplicative factors . these factors may be used to shift the ground state energy of the system . for example choosing @xmath369 as before with @xmath371 will shift the ground state energy to @xmath372 . in the following the factors are taken to be @xmath57 . finally we would like to remark that usually when using the matrix ansatz for systems with periodic boundary conditions it is often convenient to use a trace of the matrix product @xcite . in this case this is not possible since the trace of our tensor product is always zero . in terms of the ansatz ( [ eq : ansatz ] ) the partition function @xmath52 is given by @xmath373 note that we are using the canonical ensemble since all tensor products with unequal number of particles do not contribute to @xmath52 this is easily seen since in these cases there are always more than @xmath98 @xmath328 matrices acting on one of the vectors @xmath374 . to obtain the partition function we derive a recursion relation for @xmath375 one can see that @xmath376 . rewriting @xmath377 as @xmath378 and using relations ( [ eq : tensors ] ) and ( [ eq : matrix ] ) the following recursion relation can be derived @xmath379 the boundary conditions for this recursion relation is given by the no particle partition function @xmath380 if @xmath381 and is zero otherwise . for small systems ( up to @xmath382 ) for which the recursion relation is tractable analytically on mathematica , we obtained the partition function @xmath383 as a polynomial in @xmath54 . as expected the first @xmath384 terms of the polynomial match the first @xmath384 terms of the expansion of ( [ psum ] ) up to a factor of @xmath385 due to the energy shift in the ground state . for larger @xmath5 we solve the recursion relation numerically . we note that ( [ eq : reccursion1 ] ) could have been derived directly from the definition of the partition function without recourse to the tensor ansatz . however , we believe the utility of the ansatz lies in the ease with which correlation functions can be manipulated and relations such as that of the next subsection derived . the correlation function @xmath317 is given in terms of the ansatz by @xmath386 using relations ( [ eq : tensors]),([eq : commutation ] ) and ( [ eq : matrix ] ) we obtain @xmath387 where we define the object @xmath388 through , @xmath389 a recursion relation for @xmath388 can be obtained , similarly to the recursion relation for the partition function ( [ eq : reccursion1 ] ) . using ( [ eq : tensors ] ) and ( [ eq : matrix ] ) gives @xmath390 the boundary conditions for the recursion relation are obtained by noting that @xmath391 , _ i.e. _ , @xmath392 . using the same methods one can obtain recursion relations for all other correlation functions . the recursion relations are solved numerically for finite systems . this is done by first solving numerically for @xmath393 , and then using the result as boundary conditions for the recursion relation ( [ eq : u recurr ] ) . owing to ( [ a1ar ] ) we are ultimately interested in @xmath394 . using these recursion relations we have calculated the correlation function @xmath395 , which is a measure of the phase separation in the system , for various system sizes . when @xmath396 is close to zero the system is phase separated . in the disordered case , @xmath12 , the value of the correlation function is @xmath397 , approaching @xmath398 in the thermodynamic limit . the results are shown in the inset of fig . [ order ] one can see that the system is phase separated for small values of @xmath54 while for @xmath54 close to @xmath57 the system is disordered . the range of @xmath54 values for which the system is phase separated increases as the system size increases . the natural scaling variable near the critical point @xmath12 is @xmath399 , the ratio between the domain size @xmath98 and the domain wall width @xmath400 . in fig.([order ] ) the correlation function is plotted as a function of the scaling variable . one can see that the data collapse improves as the system size increases . this scaling variable was also suggested by the form of the partition function ( [ psum ] ) in section iii c. in the following we discuss possible generalization of the model to @xmath401 species . to demonstrate how this might be done we first discuss the case @xmath402 . we then comment briefly on @xmath403 . we now define a @xmath180-species model and argue that it phase separates . consider a ring where each site is occupied by either an @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath8 or @xmath404 particle . the model evolves according to the following procedure : at each time step two nearest neighbors are chosen randomly and exchanged according to the rates , @xmath405 as before the model conserves the number of particles of each species . note that several other generalizations of the model to four species are possible . however , for simplicity , we discuss only the model defined by ( [ eq : four ] ) with @xmath35 . we now argue that the system phase separates into a configuration of the form @xmath406 ( where each letter now indicates a domain ) as long as the densities of particles of each species are non - zero . note that in the model @xmath17 , @xmath18 , @xmath407 , @xmath408 , @xmath15 and @xmath409 boundaries are stable while reverse boundaries @xmath410 , @xmath16 , @xmath411 , @xmath412 , @xmath19 and @xmath413 are unstable . as in the case of the three species model the system , starting from a random initial condition , evolves on a short time scale ( _ i.e. _ , which is not determined by the size of the system ) into a metastable configuration where only stable domains are present . this configuration then slowly coarsens by slow diffusion of particles through neighboring domains . the system will finally reach the most stable state where the number of domains is minimal . one can easily check that this configuration is given by @xmath406 . note that the system may exhibit other metastable states . for example , a state composed of @xmath414 is also stable under the choice of rates ( [ eq : four ] ) . however , since this state is composed of more domains than the @xmath180-domain state , some of the domains are necessarily smaller . according to the argument presented in section ii the relaxation time of this sequence ( proportional to @xmath415 where @xmath128 is the typical domain size ) is much shorter than the relaxation time of the @xmath180-domain state . therefore the @xmath180-domain state is more stable so that the system will finally evolve into it . in considering @xmath403 models one finds that for some choices of transition rates several states with the minimum number of domains may become metastable . for example , for @xmath416 it is possible to choose transition rates for which both @xmath417 and @xmath418 are locally stable . the relative stability ( and thus the resulting phase separated state ) may be found by determining the relaxation time of these states using simple considerations such as those presented in section ii . as is the case of @xmath3 detailed balance is found to be satisfied for certain densities and transition rates for @xmath419 . the condition for this is derived in appendix [ dbappen ] . in this case the relative stability of metastable states could be determined by comparing free energies . in this paper a model of three species of particles diffusing on a ring previously introduced in @xcite has been studied . the model is governed by local dynamics in which all moves compatible with the conservation of the three densities are allowed . we argue that phase separation should occur as long as all densities are non - zero . in the special case of equal densities we find that the steady state generated by the local stochastic dynamics is exactly given by a long - range asymmetric hamiltonian . phase separation for this case is explicitly demonstrated . the model provides an explicit example for the mechanism leading to phase separation or breaking of ergodicity in systems with _ local _ stochastic dynamics . although we did not succeed in solving the steady state in the case of non - equal densities of particles , there is a strong evidence that phase separation still occurs . in order to investigate further the case of equal densities we employed a generalized matrix ansatz to calculate correlation function for finite - size systems . the novel structure of the ansatz may give some clue as to handle other @xmath0 models which have so far resisted solution . the dynamics of phase separation reduces to a coarsening problem where the typical domain size grows logarithmically in time . this results from the elimination of the domains at a rate exponentially small in their size . the slow dynamics poses a problem of how to access the scaling regime numerically . with direct numerical simulations only small systems can be studied ( see fig . however , by employing a toy model in which domains rather than individual sites are updated one can simulate much larger systems and probe the scaling regime ( see fig . 5 ) . such ideas of updating domains have been used before in the study of coarsening @xcite . with the aid of the toy model it should be possible to study other aspects of the scaling regime associated with the slow dynamics and escape from metastable states . generalizations are possible to models with @xmath419 species . we have discussed some possibilities and have shown that phase separation may take place , although the structure of the set of metastable states is more complicated . as was the case for @xmath3 , conditions for detailed balance with respect to a long - range hamiltonian may be determined . the problem of phase separation and coarsening is of interest also in the broader context of phase transitions in one dimensional systems . here the existence of conserved quantities results in certain local transition rates being zero . it would be interesting to generalize this study to models in which no conserved quantity exists and all local rates are non - vanishing . also , another open problem is to calculate the steady state of the present model in the case of non - equal densities . * acknowledgments * : mre is a royal society university research fellow and thanks the weizmann institute and the einstein center for warm hospitality during several visits . the support of the minerva foundation , munich germany , the israeli science foundation , and the israel ministry of science is gratefully acknowledged . computations were performed on the sp2 at the inter - university high performance computer center , tel aviv . we thank s. wiseman for helpful advice on programming and m. j. e. richardson for careful reading of the manuscript . to solve the mean - field model we follow the method used in @xcite . let @xmath299 be the number of domains of size @xmath24 , irrespective of the type of particle it consists of . let @xmath300 be the length of the smallest domain and @xmath301 be the total number of domains at time @xmath226 . we will assume that @xmath299 has the following scaling form in the large - time limit . @xmath420 after the elimination of the smallest domain as given by ( [ toy2 ] ) , @xmath421 and @xmath4 change according to @xmath422 using the scaling form ( [ nlform ] ) we have , @xmath423\ ] ] where @xmath424 and we have expanded in @xmath425 . now substituting these in ( [ modif ] ) , it is straightforward to show that @xmath426 using the laplace transform , @xmath427~f(x)\ ] ] one can show that @xmath428 satisfies the differential equation , @xmath429[2 \phi(p ) + e^{-p}]\ ] ] since @xmath430 , by expanding ( [ phip ] ) to order @xmath431 one obtains @xmath432 . the solution of ( [ phip ] ) with boundary conditions @xmath433 and @xmath434 for @xmath435 is @xmath436 where @xmath437/t = -\log(x ) - \gamma - \sum_{n=1}^{\infty } ( -x)^n/(n!\ n)$ ] and @xmath438 is the euler constant . inverse laplace transform of ( [ solu ] ) gives the domain size distribution . from ( [ solu ] ) and using the expansion @xmath439 , where the average is with respect to @xmath440 , we get @xmath441 we now define the most general @xmath4 species model , where @xmath442 . let @xmath443 denote a variable at site @xmath1 of a ring of size @xmath5 , which takes values @xmath444 . @xmath445 means that site @xmath1 is occupied by a particle of type @xmath128 . the system evolves by a random sequential , nearest - neighbor exchange dynamics , with the following rates : consider a particle exchange between sites @xmath62 and @xmath63 , where @xmath451 and @xmath452 ( _ i.e. _ in the bulk , note that site @xmath57 is chosen arbitrarily ) . expanding the product in ( [ eq : sweight ] ) , it is easy to verify that @xmath453 since this hold for any @xmath454 , and is irrespective of the number of particles of each species , the steady - state weight ( [ eq : sweight ] ) satisfies detailed balance for all nearest - neighbor exchanges in the bulk . if the weights ( [ eq : sweight ] ) are translationally invariant then detailed balance will also hold for exchanges between sites @xmath57 and @xmath5 . thus , to complete the proof of detailed balance it is sufficient to demand that ( [ eq : sweight ] ) is translationally invariant . to do this we relabel sites @xmath455 . the weight then becomes @xmath456 where @xmath457 is identical to @xmath458 . rewriting this equation by relabeling the indices we obtain , @xmath459 \ \prod_{k=1}^{n-1}\frac{q(x_k , x_n)}{q(x_n , x_k ) } \ ; .\ ] ] comparing ( [ eq : sweight3 ] ) with ( [ eq : sweight ] ) and noting for example that , @xmath460^{n_l } \ ; , \ ] ] one can see that ( [ eq : sweight ] ) is translational invariant if @xmath461^{n_{l } } = 1 \ ; , \ ] ] for every @xmath462 . thus , detailed balance holds if ( [ condition ] ) is satisfied . we note that for given densities @xmath463 the manifold of solutions for the rates is of @xmath464 dimensions . Abstract:
[ "a driven system of three species of particle diffusing on a ring is studied in detail . the dynamics is _ local _ and conserves the three densities . a simple argument suggesting that the model should phase separate and break the translational symmetry is given . we show that for the special case where the three densities are equal the model obeys detailed balance and the steady - state distribution is governed by a hamiltonian with asymmetric long - range interactions . this provides an explicit demonstration of a simple mechanism for breaking of ergodicity in one dimension . the steady state of finite - size systems is studied using a generalized matrix product ansatz . the coarsening process leading to phase separation is studied numerically and in a mean - field model . the system exhibits slow dynamics due to trapping in metastable states whose number is exponentially large in the system size . the typical domain size is shown to grow logarithmically in time . generalizations to a larger number of species are discussed ." ]
11,871
11,871
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: electrostatic interactions of charged macromolecules and colloids are often governed by small oppositely charged ions ( counterions ) that maintain global electroneutrality . these counterion - mediated interactions play a fundamental role in classical charged ( coulomb ) fluids that are abundant in biological and soft matter context @xcite and include many charged macromolecules ( such as nucleic acids dna and rna , actin filaments , microtubules and globular proteins ) , affecting their functional , structural and dynamical behavior . in spite of the importance of electrostatic interactions , there is no general method that would allow for an accurate prediction of electrostatic effects in all regions of the parameter space , defined by the surface charge density of macroions , charge valency of counterions , dielectric mismatches between the often hydrophobic core of the macromolecule and the surrounding aqueous medium , etc . often the electrostatic interactions are treated on the poisson - boltzmann ( pb ) level leading to effective interactions which turn out to be always repulsive between like - charged macromolecules . conceptually , the pb approach corresponds to a mean - field treatment of electrostatic interactions and is asymptotically valid only for sufficiently large separations between macromolecules , low enough surface charge densities and low counterion valency @xcite . it characterizes a situation where electrostatic fluctuations and correlations due to the counterions are negligible . there are other regions in the parameter space of charged macromolecules where one expects the mean - field framework to break down leading to the emergence of a completely different non - pb - type physics . a notorious example is the phenomenon of like - charge attraction , which emerges between highly charged macroions or in the presence of high valency counterions and has been at the focus of both experimental @xcite and theoretical investigations in recent years ( see refs . @xcite for an extensive reference list ) . it appears to us that among the most important recent advances in this field has been the systematization of non - pb effects based on the notions of _ weak coupling _ ( wc ) and _ strong coupling _ ( sc ) approximations . these terms refer to the strength of electrostatic coupling in the system and may be understood conceptually in terms of the electrostatic interactions of mobile counterions with fixed external charges ( macroions ) in the system when compared with direct electrostatic interactions between the counterions themselves . this latter contribution may be characterized in terms of the _ bjerrum length _ , @xmath0 which corresponds to the separation at which two unit charges , @xmath1 , interact with thermal energy @xmath2 in a medium of dielectric constant @xmath3 ( in water and at room temperature , the value is @xmath4 nm ) . if the charge of the counterions is @xmath5 then the bjerrum length scales as @xmath6 . the interaction of counterions with macroion charges ( of surface charge density @xmath7 ) can be characterized in terms of the so - called _ gouy - chapman length _ , @xmath8 which gives the separation at which the counterion - surface interaction energy equals @xmath2 . the ratio of these two fundamental length scales introduces a dimensionless parameter @xmath9 which is known as the ( netz - moreira ) electrostatic coupling parameter @xmath10 @xcite and quantifies the strength of electrostatic coupling in the system . this parameter is closely related to the plasma parameter of ionic systems @xcite and may be written also in terms of the typical lateral spacing , @xmath11 , between counterions in the proximity of a charged surface , i.e. , @xmath12 as set by the local electroneutrality condition @xmath13 . it then follows that in the weak coupling regime , defined by @xmath14 , the width of the gouy - chapman layer @xmath15 is much larger than the separation between two neighbouring counterions in the counterion layer and thus it behaves basically as a three - dimensional gas . each counterion in this case interacts with many others and the collective mean - field approach of the poisson - boltzmann type is thoroughly justified . on the other hand , in the strong coupling regime , defined by @xmath16 , the mean distance between counterions , @xmath11 , exceeds the layer width and thus the counterion layer behaves essentially as a two - dimensional layer @xcite . in this case the mean - field approach breaks down as each counterion is isolated laterally in a relatively large correlation hole of size @xmath11 . in fact , as each counterion can move almost independently from the others along the direction perpendicular to the charged surface , the properties of the system are dominated by single - particle contributions on the leading order , which is in stark contrast with the collective mean - field picture and emerges as a direct consequence of strong electrostatic correlations in the system . the two dychotomous limits are characterised by a low ( high ) valency of the counterions , a small ( large ) value of the surface charge density and/or large ( small ) medium dielectric constant . conceptually the study of the sc regime has been pioneered in several recent works @xcite using various analytical methods . it was shown @xcite that both the wc and the sc limits may be described analytically as two exact _ limiting laws _ from a single general theory for classical coulomb fluids : while the pb theory follows in the limit of @xmath17 , a limiting single - particle sc theory follows in the limit @xmath18 , which thus allow for an exact statistical mechanical treatment of charged systems at two opposed limiting conditions . the parameter space in between can be analyzed by approximate methods @xcite , being accessible effectively only _ via _ computer simulations @xcite . exact solutions for the whole range of coupling parameters are available only in one dimension @xcite . the wc - sc paradigm has been tested extensively @xcite and was found to describe computer simulations quantitatively correctly in the respective regimes of validity , thus providing a unifying view of the behavior of coulomb fluids . the main facets of these results are retained even when the model system is generalized in order to include more realistic features describing the bathing solution or the nature of the fixed or mobile charges in the system . though , for instance , multipolar charge distribution of mobile counterions @xcite or statistically disordered distribution of fixed charges @xcite unavoidably introduce novel features in the counterion - mediated electrostatic interaction , the application of the same general philosophy embodied in the weak and strong coupling limits remains sound and valid . the only case where it needs to be amended in an essential manner is when the bathing solution contains a mixture of univalent as well as polyvalent salts , which incidentally are also the most common experimental conditions . in that case a more sophisticated mixed weak - strong coupling analysis is in order leading to qualitatively different results @xcite . though originally formulated in the context of planar macroions , these advances have transpired also in the dna - like models of polyelectrolytes which deal with electrostatic interactions in the context of macroions with cylindrical or indeed helical fixed charge distribution . indeed this particular variant of counterion - mediated interactions has a venerable history @xcite . during the last two decades several distinct analytical approaches aimed in different directions improved the classical pb results for simple dna - like models and revealed the importance of correlation effects as well as several other factors including the discrete or helical charge distributions , chain flexibility , finite molecular size , and dielectric inhomogeneities @xcite . guided by these developments we set ourselves the goal of systematically analyzing the interactions between cylindrical macroions mediated by mobile counterions in the presence of dielectric inhomogeneities . contrary to the case of planar macroions which can be completely characterized by a single dimensionless coupling parameter , cylindrical macroions require in general two dimensionless coupling parameters that consistently describe the range of validity of the strong and weak coupling approximations . the existence of two coupling parameters is due to the simple fact that , if compared to the planar case , the cylinder has a finite radius that needs to enter the fundamental description of the problem . this other dimensionless parameter brought fourth by cylindrical geometry of the macroion is nothing but the so - called _ manning parameter _ @xcite . for a cylinder of radius @xmath19 and linear charge density @xmath20 , it is given by @xmath21 the manning parameter thus represents the dimensionless linear charge density or , on the other hand , also the rescaled radius of the cylindrical charge distribution . note that the two parameters ( i.e. , @xmath10 and @xmath22 ) in the cylindrical geometry are independent and can be set separately . for double - stranded dna ( @xmath23 ) , the manning parameter and the ( netz - moreira ) electrostatic coupling parameter are given by @xmath24 and @xmath25 ( at room temperature in water ) in terms of the counterion valency @xmath26 . in this paper we will analyze systematically the interactions between two cylindrical macroions characterized by a fixed surface charge density as well as a finite dielectric jump between the external dielectric background ( corresponding to a continuum solvent ) and the hydrophobic cores of cylindrical macroions . analytically derived results in both limits of strong and weak coupling will be compared directly with monte - carlo simulation results . the organization of this paper is as follows : we first introduce our model and study the image - charge effects within the problem of a single charged cylinder with neutralizing counterions in section [ sec : one_cyl ] . we then focus on the interaction between two identical charged dielectric cylinders within the wc and the sc theory as well as mc simulations in section [ sec : two_cylinder ] . the results in the presence and absence of dielectric discontinuity at the cylindrical boundaries are analyzed in detail in order to bring up the effects due to the image charges in the two - cylinder geometry . let us focus first on the problem of a single infinitely long uniformly charged cylindrical macroion of radius @xmath19 . the charge of the cylinder is assumed to be distributed uniformly on its surface according to the charge distribution function @xmath27 with @xmath20 being the absolute _ linear _ charge density and @xmath28 the radial coordinate from the cylinder axis . the cylinder is arbitrarily chosen to be negatively charged and its electrical charge is thus neutralized by positively charged mobile counterions of valency @xmath29 , which are present in the region @xmath30 only . in general , the interior of the cylindrical macromolecule can be characterized by a different dielectric constant @xmath31 than the surrounding continuum solvent medium , @xmath3 . this is certainly the case for dna that has a hydrophobic inner core composed mostly of stacked nitrogen bases that have a vastly different dielectric response from an aqueous solution @xcite . other charged polymers that usually do not share structural features with dna can nevertheless also posses hydrophobic inner cores with a local dielectric response that differs from the one of the solvent . the hydrophobic apolar core of the macromolecular backbone would then have a static dielectric constant @xmath32 ( hydrocarbon ) , while the surrounding continuum dielectric medium which is usually water , a polar associated liquid , would be characterized by @xmath33 . one can thus introduce the dielectric discontinuity parameter @xmath34 which measures the relative dielectric mismatch at the interface of the two materials . in a dielectrically homogeneous system , we have @xmath35 and no image charge effects are present , while , for instance , in water - hydrocarbon systems , one has @xmath36 , which suggests strong image charge effects ( note that @xmath37 and the largest value for @xmath38 is obtained when one medium is ideally polarizable , i.e. , is an ideal metal ) . therefore , a single cylinder can be described by three different dimensionless parameters , namely , the electrostatic coupling parameter @xmath10 , the manning parameter @xmath22 and the dielectric discontinuity parameter @xmath38 as defined in eqs . ( [ eq : xicouple ] ) , ( [ eq : xi_m ] ) and ( [ eq : jump ] ) , respectively . the presence of a dielectric inhomogeneity across the boundary of the cylinder , see fig . [ fig : model_1cyln ] , influences the electrostatic potential that can be thus described by the green s function connecting two points @xmath39 outside the cylinder as @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the direct standard coulomb kernel in the absence of dielectric inhomogeneities , @xmath42 and @xmath43 is the image correction " due to the dielectric jump just as in the case of a planar discontinuity . unfortunately in cylindrical geometry the concept of kelvin image charges , that plays such a fundamental role for planar dielectric discontinuities , is a bit diluted since the image correction can not be in general formulated in a way that would entail a summation of properly positioned point image charges . we nevertheless consistently refer to the effects of dielectric inhomogeneities in this system as dielectric image effects . if explicitly stated we believe this inconsistency in nomenclature can not be a source of confusion . instead of using the concept of point image charges one must in fact explicitly solve the poisson equation in cylindrical geometry specified by cylindrical coordinates @xmath44 with appropriate boundary conditions at the surface of the cylinder , which requires the normal component of the electric field to fulfill the following relation @xmath45 where @xmath46 is the cylinder surface charge density . solving the poisson equation with the proper eigenfunction expansion @xcite one can express the image part of the green s function as @xmath47 with the following definition @xmath48 where @xmath49 and @xmath50 are the angle and height differences between the position vectors @xmath51 and @xmath52 , respectively . @xmath53 and @xmath54 are the modified bessel functions of the first and the second kind that enter the eigenfunction expansion @xcite . having derived the appropriate green s function for the cylindrical geometry , we now investigate the behavior of counterions in proximity to a charged dielectric cylinder in the two limits specified by the weak and strong coupling approximations that can be treated analytically . the behavior at intermediate coupling strengths will be analyzed by using extensive mc simulations . as noted before , the wc regime is characterized by a small coupling parameter @xmath14 , which is adequate for low valency counterions , small surface charge , high temperature or high solvent dielectric constant . in the strict limit of @xmath17 , ignoring the usually small fluctuations around the mean field configuration , the system is described exactly by the mean - field pb theory @xcite . formally the pb equation corresponds to the saddle - point condition imposed on the action field - functional in this limit @xcite . for the present system , the pb equation governing the mean electrostatic potential takes the form @xmath55 where the right - hand side is obviously the number density of the counterions , i.e. @xmath56 note that due to axial symmetry and translational invariance in the @xmath57 direction , the problem is reduced to a one - dimensional formulation with @xmath58 and the solution of the pb equation depends only on the radial coordinate @xmath28 . the analytical solution of the pb equation in this case is well known and was first discussed in refs . @xcite within the so - called _ cell model _ where the cylindrical macroion is confined ( coaxially ) in an outer cylindrical boundary of radius @xmath59 . the cell model guarantees a finite solution for the counterion density despite the extremely slowly varying ( logarithmic ) electrostatic potential in two dimensions . the solution of the pb equation for the counterion density takes different forms depending on whether the manning parameter is larger or smaller than a threshold value given by @xmath60 $ ] @xcite . here we are interested mainly in the situations with sufficiently large manning parameters @xmath61 , where the normalized counterion density can be written as @xmath62 , \label{npb}\ ] ] with @xmath63 determined from the transcendental equation @xmath64}.\ ] ] note that the density profile is renormalized such that we have @xmath65 the above density distribution is a monotonically decaying function with very slowly convergent asymptotics @xcite . it is also independent of the dielectric jump parameter , @xmath38 , due to the axial symmetry which implies that the electrostatic field vanishes inside the cylinder . the absence of dielectric discontinuity effects is specific to the mean - field limit where no fluctuations are taken into account and can be derived also in the case of planar slabs @xcite . when the manning parameter is decreased , the system exhibits a continuous counterion condensation transition @xcite at a critical manning parameter @xmath66 . the nature of this transition has been analyzed throughly by means of analytical and numerical methods @xcite . it was in particular shown that the behavior close to the transition point is described by the mean - field theory and fluctuation and correlation effects ( that will be important eventually at sufficiently large manning parameters ) play no role at the transition point . here we shall not consider the behavior of counterions close to the transition point but do note that since the image - charge effects are absent in the mean - field limit , such effects are expected to have no influence on the counterion condensation transition itself . in what follows , we shall also take into account the hard - core repulsion between counterions and the cylinder by assuming that the counterions have a finite radius @xmath67 . within the pb theory , this can not be done explicitly unless full corrections due to excluded - volume repulsions between counterions are taken into account @xcite . here we shall consider a simplified version of the ion size effects by taking an effective hard - core radius for the cylinder , i.e. , by setting @xmath68 . though approximate on the wc level , this procedure turns out to be exact in the sc limit @xcite . ( a ) 0.25 cm ( b ) 0.25 cm ( c ) 0.25 cm in the regime when @xmath69 , the mean - field approximation breaks down , and a different kind of approach is needed . we shall focus on the limit of @xmath18 , where the system can be treated via a systematic strong coupling virial expansion @xcite leading to an exact analytical theory in the leading order in @xmath10 . by construction the sc theory is a single particle theory and contains contributions only from single - particle interactions . we do not elaborate on the derivation of the sc theory here as further details can be found in previous publications @xcite . in this section , we shall be interested in the counterion density profile around the cylinder in the sc limit . the general form of the counterion distribution within the sc theory turns out to be given in terms of a boltzmann factor containing the interaction energy of an individual counterion with a fixed charged macroion @xcite . in a dielectrically inhomogeneous system , such as a charged cylindrical core considered here , the sc counterion density may be written as @xcite @xmath70 , \label{eq : density_ci}\ ] ] where @xmath71 is the dielectric image _ self - energy _ of a single counterion , i.e. , the electrostatic energy of a charged point particle in the vicinity of a neutral dielectric cylinder . this energy of course represents the contribution from the interaction of a counterion with its image charge and thus depends crucially on the value of the dielectric discontinuity at the macroion surface . furthermore , @xmath72 where @xmath73 is the bare electrostatic interaction energy of a single counterion located at a given position @xmath74 with the cylinder charge ( up to an irrelevant additive constant ) . it goes to zero when the charge density on the macroion surface goes to zero . the image - dependent part of the interaction energy between a point charge and the surface charge distribution on the dielectric cylinder , @xmath75 , can be shown to be nil due to the axial symmetry , i.e. @xmath76 if the surface charge distribution on the macroion is non - uniform , such as in the case of charged helical stripes @xcite , the image dependent part of the interaction energy is non - zero and should be considered explicitly . note that physically the dielectric image - dependent part of the interaction energy corresponds to the interaction between the dielectrically induced image charge of the surface charge on the cylinder with the counterion as well as the image charge of the counterion with the surface charge on the cylinder , as follows from the general definition of the green s function ( [ eq : u_0u_im ] ) . using the above equations , we obtain the sc counterion number density profile ( @xmath30 ) as @xmath77 , \label{nsc}\ ] ] where we have introduced the dimensionless integral @xmath78 and the numerical prefactor @xmath79 is determined from the normalization condition , eq . ( [ normrho ] ) . we can extract two limiting behaviors for the function @xmath80 , viz . @xmath81 the limiting form of @xmath80 for @xmath82 implies that at very small separations between a single counterion and the cylindrical surface , the dielectric self - energy has the same form as in the case of a counterion next to a planar wall , where the polarization effects can be described by an image charge inside the wall @xcite . the sc density for @xmath35 reduces to the well - known form for a homogeneous system @xmath83 @xcite . if the dielectric core has a smaller dielectric constant than the medium ( @xmath84 ) , as one typically encounters in the case of biological macromolecules , the image charges have the same sign as counterions and thus lead to a depletion of counterions in the vicinity of the cylinder . this behavior can be seen from the sc density profiles plotted in fig . [ fig : dens]a as the dielectric mismatch parameter @xmath38 or the coupling parameter @xmath10 is increased . they show a reduced density close to the cylinder ( depletion zone ) and a peak some distance away from the cylinder surface . one can estimate the location of the density peak by setting the density ( [ nsc ] ) derivative to zero , @xmath85 . using the approximation ( [ eqi ] ) for @xmath86 , where @xmath87 is the peak distance from the cylinder surface , we obtain to the leading order for small @xmath87 @xmath88 which shows good agreement with the peak location values of the sc density profile as seen in fig . [ fig : dens]a . as noted before , effects of a finite counterion radius @xmath67 within the sc approximation can be taken into account exactly ( due to the single particle nature of the theory ) by increasing the hard - core radius of the cylinder to @xmath89 . the counterion - counterion excluded - volume repulsion effects are absent within the leading - order sc theory and enter only in the subleading terms . we have performed extensive mc simulations in order to verify the validities of the weak- and strong - coupling approaches . the detailed description of mc simulation is given in appendix [ app : mc ] . in fig . [ fig : dens]b we show the radial density profile of counterions around the cylinder without dielectric image effect , @xmath35 . apparently in this case the simulation data are always bracketed by the two analytical results obtained from the wc and sc theories , eqs . ( [ npb ] ) and ( [ nsc ] ) , respectively . the wc theory is found to be valid at sufficiently small coupling parameter or sufficiently large radial distances from the cylinder . the sc theory is valid in the opposite regime , i.e. , for sufficiently large coupling parameters or sufficiently small radial distances . in fact , in agreement with the general trend obtained for planar surfaces @xcite , the validity regime of the sc ( wc ) theory expands to large ( smaller ) separations as the coupling becomes larger ( smaller ) . in the case of a planar charged wall , the validity regime of the sc theory can be estimated systematically as @xmath90 , where @xmath57 is the distance from the charged plane @xcite . in the case of a charged cylinder , a similar criterion is yet to be obtained . in fig . [ fig : dens]c , we show the results for the case where the dielectric constant of the cylinder is different from that of the medium such that @xmath91 . as already discussed the dielectric discontinuities have no effects in the wc limit as confirmed also by the agreement obtained between the simulation data and the wc ( mean - field ) result for small @xmath10 . by contrast , the image effects become quite significant at large coupling parameters as the density profile deviates qualitatively from those obtained with @xmath35 ( fig . [ fig : dens]b ) . the simulation data again show good agreement with the sc approximation at high enough couplings and small enough radial distances and in particular exhibit a depletion zone and a peak at small distances from the cylinder surface as predicted within the sc theory . note that in a dielectrically inhomogeneous system ( @xmath92 ) the sc theory has an explicit dependence on the coupling parameter @xmath10 because of the self - interaction of counterions with their image charges . we now turn our attention to the problem of the interaction between two like - charged cylinders , which is commonly used as a model for the interaction between rigid polyelectrolyte chains @xcite . we consider two identical parallel cylinders of radius @xmath19 oriented along the @xmath57 axis at an interaxial separation of @xmath93 ( see fig . [ fig : model_2cyln ] ) . the electric charge is assumed to be uniformly distributed on the surface for both cylinders with equal linear charge density @xmath20 . the cylinders are assumed to be infinitely long of length @xmath94 and are standardly confined within a confining square box of lateral size @xmath95 ( we shall assume @xmath96 in section [ subsec : wc_2cyln ] and @xmath97 in sections [ subsec : sc_2cyln]-[subsec : sc_2cyln_im ] ) , but we should emphasize that in the regime of manning parameters considered here , the lateral box size plays no significant role @xcite . ( a ) ( b ) we follow the same approach as in the case of a single cylinder and thus first analyze the problem in the weak - coupling limit and then in the strong - coupling limit . we then compare the results from these two analytical theories with the mc simulations . the weak coupling regime ( @xmath98 ) is again characterized by the mean - field pb equation . in this case however , no closed - form solution is available for the nonlinear pb theory . we thus take full recourse to the numerical methods appropriate to the problem . in the two - cylinder geometry , the axial symmetry is broken but the translational symmetry along the @xmath57 axis remains intact ; hence one has to deal with a two - dimensional pb equation in a finite bounding square @xmath99 , which is then solved numerically @xcite . we shall focus on the interaction force between the cylinders , which can be evaluated via the electrostatic stress tensor in a standard manner @xcite . note that the wc scheme used here based on the numerical solution of the pb equation allows for a full analysis of the dielectric discontinuity effects . ( later on in our sc analysis , which will be based on analytical methods , we shall restrict our discussion to only the first - order image approximation , as a full analysis of dielectric discontinuity effects in the sc limit is not yet available . ) here again the counterion size effect will be taken into account approximately by setting the distance of closest approach to each cylinder as @xmath89 . fluctuation contribution around the mean - field solution in cylindrical geometry is non - trivial to calculate @xcite but is by construction small and we thus skip its detailed analysis . it does however depend crucially on the dielectric discontinuity at the cylinder surface . in general , the wc force obtained between two like - charged cylinders is repulsive and decays monotonically with their interaxial separation @xmath93 . the mean - field prediction for the rescaled force per unit length defined via @xmath100 is shown in fig . [ fig : forcedelta_wc ] as a function of the interaxial separation @xmath93 and for different values of the dielectric discontinuity parameter @xmath38 ( see eq . ( [ eq : jump ] ) ) . note that in contrast to the case of a single cylinder studied in the previous section , the dielectric discontinuity is expected to matter in the two - cylinder geometry even within the mean - field approximation . this is due to the axial symmetry breaking which leads to electric field penetrating into the cylindrical cores . as seen in the figure , the wc mean - field results compare very well with the mc data ( to be discussed later ) at sufficiently large interaxial separations . the dielectric discontinuity has a relatively small effect on the interaction force . it leads to an increased repulsion ( and also larger deviations from the mean - field prediction ) at small interaxial separations but its effects diminish at larger separations . as noted before , the sc theory follows systematically from the leading order contribution to the partition function in the limit of infinite coupling parameter @xmath18 @xcite . the corresponding sc free energy involves only interactions between single counterions and the charged cylinders as well as the direct electrostatic interaction between the cylinders themselves ( see refs . @xcite ) . in the presence of the dielectric discontinuity effects , the sc free energy per counterion can be written as @xmath101\rmd{{\mathbf r}}. \label{f1}\ ] ] here @xmath102 is the total number of counterions and @xmath103 is the electrostatic energy due to the interaction between the two cylinders in the absence of any counterions , which contains both the direct coulomb interaction between their surface charges as well as the contribution due to their images that results from the polarization of their dielectric cores . furthermore , @xmath104 is the energy due to the interaction between a single counterion and the surface charges on both cylinders and includes contributions from the corresponding image charges as well . finally , @xmath105 is the image self - energy of counterions , i.e. , the contribution from the interaction of an individual counterion with its own image charges in both cylindrical cores . note that the volume integration should be again taken over the space available to counterions , i.e. , inside the confining square box of lateral size @xmath95 excluding the two cylindrical cores . note also that on the sc level , the counterion excluded - volume repulsions are absent ( as implied by the fact that strongly coupled counterions are highly isolated within large correlation holes in the sc limit ) and only the excluded - volume interaction between the counterions and the cylinders will be present . in fact , the counterion size effects can be accounted for exactly within the sc theory via a hard - core repulsion which simply amounts to setting the effective ( hard core ) cylinder radius as @xmath106 @xcite . as in the single cylinder case all charges are coupled with the interaction kernel , composed of direct and image part , but with the difference that now the image part of the kernel @xmath107 corresponds to two dielectric cylinders separated by the distance @xmath93 . this kernel should satisfy the electrostatic boundary conditions on both cylindrical surfaces ( [ bc ] ) , which leads to very complicated numerical expressions and is unfortunately not available in a closed analytical form . our aim is nevertheless to give a simple approximate analytical expression for the final results , so we need to make an approximation at this step . in what follows we focus on the first - order - image approximation , where we neglect higher orders of inter - cylindrical image interaction . this approximation implies that the image green s functions of the two cylinders can be written as the sum of the green s functions of the isolated cylinders , eq . ( [ vim ] ) , @xmath108 where @xmath109 is the one - cylinder image kernel , eq . ( [ vim ] ) . here , @xmath110 , @xmath111 are distances centered at the first and @xmath112 , @xmath113 at the second cylinder , for instance , @xmath114 with @xmath115 a unit vector pointing in the @xmath116 direction , i.e. , horizontally on fig . [ fig : model_2cyln ] . recall that the surface charge is uniformly distributed on both cylinders so that the fixed charge distribution is composed of two single cylinder distributions @xmath117 where @xmath118 is the charge distribution of a single cylinder , eq . ( [ n0 ] ) . with these assumptions one can then evaluate all interaction terms in eq . ( [ f1 ] ) analytically as follows . the cylinder - cylinder interaction energy per counterion can be obtained as @xmath119 furthermore the image self - energy of a single counterion interacting with the dielectric cores of both cylinders can be derived in the form @xmath120 , \label{wself}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath80 is defined in eq . ( [ eqw ] ) . finally , the single particle cylinder - counterion contribution can be written as the sum of the interaction with each cylinder separately and assumes the form @xmath121 the cylinder - counterion energy contribution from the @xmath15-th cylinder ( with @xmath122 ) is itself composed of three parts , @xmath123 which correspond respectively to three parts of the green s function , i.e. , @xmath124 , within the approximation implied by eq . ( [ vim2 ] ) and will be evaluated as follows . the first contribution in eq . ( [ eq : v_contrib ] ) , @xmath125 , is the direct interaction of the bare surface charge of each cylinder with a single counterion , i.e. , for the the @xmath15-th cylinder , @xmath126 where @xmath127 is the radial distance from the center of the @xmath15-th cylinder to the counterion , and @xmath22 is the manning parameter as defined in eq . ( [ eq : xi_m ] ) . the second contribution , @xmath128 corresponds to the interaction of a counterion image charge with the surface charge on the _ same _ cylinder , which is thus _ zero _ by symmetry reasons as already discussed in the one - cylinder case , eq . ( [ vself ] ) . this contribution can be also considered as the interaction between the image of the surface charge on the same cylinder with the counterion . finally , we have the cross contributions due to the interaction of a counterion image in one cylinder with the surface charge on the _ other _ cylinder . formally , it follows for each cylinder as ( see appendix [ app : cross ] ) @xmath129 for @xmath130 , where @xmath131 is the radial distance from an axis shifted by @xmath132 from the center of the @xmath15-th cylinder toward the axis of the other cylinder , see fig . [ fig : model_2cyln]b , i.e. , @xmath133 or in cartesian coordinates , @xmath134 the sc free energy thus follows by inserting the above expressions into eq . ( [ f1 ] ) in the form @xmath135- \nonumber \\ & -&\xi(1-\delta)\ln\,\rho_1 ^ 2\rho_2 ^ 2- \xi \delta\,\ln\,{\rho_1^{*}}^2{\rho_2^{*}}^2\biggr\}\rmd{{\mathbf r}}. \label{free}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the corresponding sc force between the two cylinders is obtained simply by differentiating the free energy with respect to @xmath93 @xmath136 which may be expressed in dimensionless units according to eq . ( [ forcedef_wc ] ) . the sc density profile follows from the general expression ( [ eq : density_ci ] ) , which is the same as the integrand in ( [ free ] ) , viz . @xmath137- \label{dens2}\\ & -&\,\xi(1-\delta)\ln\,\rho_1 ^ 2\rho_2 ^ 2- \xi \delta\,\ln\,{\rho_1^{*}}^2{\rho_2^{*}}^2\biggr\}\nonumber.\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the normalization prefactor is determined from the electroneutrality condition . note that the forms of the sc free energy , eq . ( [ free ] ) , and the sc counterion density profile , eq . ( [ dens2 ] ) , reflect the fact that , within the first - order image approximation ( and using the appropriate volume constraints for counterions ) , the two charged dielectric cylindrical cores can be equivalently replaced by four parallel lines of charges , two of which are located along the central axis for each of the cylinders with ( renormalized ) linear charge density @xmath138 and the two other lines of charges with linear charge density @xmath139 are placed along two axes shifted by @xmath132 from the central axis for each of the cylinders , see fig . [ fig : model_2cyln ] . note that the image charge language is applicable for two charged dielectric cylinders in the absence of pointlike charges ( counterions ) @xcite , and can be exactly solved by applying higher orders of images . but in order to be consistent with the first - order image counterion - cylinder approximation , we have used the same image kernel ( [ vim2 ] ) , which accounts for the first - order image approximation between the two cylinders as well ( [ f1 ] ) . at interaxial separtaion @xmath140 and in the absence of image charges ( @xmath35 ) . the density is shown across an arbitrary plane perpendicular to the two cylinders in a color - coded fashion as indicated on the graph . the small depletion zone around each cylinder is due to the counterion volume exclusion as counterions are assumed to have a finite radius of @xmath141 . ] 0.25 cm at interaxial separtaion @xmath140 and in the absence of image charges ( @xmath35 ) . the density is shown across an arbitrary plane perpendicular to the two cylinders in a color - coded fashion as indicated on the graph . the small depletion zone around each cylinder is due to the counterion volume exclusion as counterions are assumed to have a finite radius of @xmath141 . ] 0.25 cm ( a ) 0.25 cm ( b ) 0.25 cm ( c ) 0.25 cm in order to proceed , let us first consider the case where there is no dielectric mismatch between the cylinders and the surrounding medium , i.e. , @xmath35 ; the image charges will thus be absent . the sc interaction in this case has been considered also in previous works @xcite . we shall reproduce some of these previous results for the sake of completeness , but will also provide several new results , including a direct comparison with mc simulations for the force dependence as a function of separation at different values of the coupling parameter as well as a global interaction phase diagram , which have not been considered previously . in the absence of image charges , the sc free energy ( [ free ] ) reduces to a simple form as @xmath142 where the first term is again the bare repulsion between the two cylinders and the second term contains energetic and entropic contributions from counterions . the results for the sc force that follow from eq . ( [ free0 ] ) are shown in fig . [ fig : force0 ] for a few different manning parameters , where we have accounted for the finite counterion radius by choosing @xmath143 . the sc force is repulsive at small separations and becomes attractive beyond the equilibrium interaxial distance @xmath144 where the force vanishes . the sc attraction is mediated by counterions that are strongly coupled to both cylinders in this limit and are thus accumulated mainly in the region between the two cylinders as can be seen from the counterion distribution ( [ dens2 ] ) in fig . [ fig : densdelta0 ] . this is a direct consequence of the energy contributions included in the second term in eq . ( [ free0 ] ) @xcite . by decreasing the separation between the cylinders , the entropic osmotic pressure from counterions sandwiched between the two cylinders becomes increasingly important and the effective interaction becomes repulsive . this repulsion is reduced as the surface - surface separation , @xmath145 , becomes smaller than the counterion diameter , @xmath146 as the counterions are depleted from the intervening region due to excluded - volume effects . this behavior due to the presence of the counterion depletion interaction has been investigated thoroughly in the case of cylinders with helical charge pattern and we shall not delve on it any further here @xcite . as seen in fig . [ fig : force0 ] the entropic repulsion effects at small separations decrease when the manning parameter @xmath22 is increased . for very large manning parameters , the free energy is dominated by purely energetic contributions and does not contain any temperature effects . in fact the limit @xmath147 formally corresponds to the zero temperature limit as we have already taken the limit @xmath18 appropriate within the sc approximation . the connection between the sc limit and the zero temperature limit has been analyzed in detail in refs . @xcite . the asymptotic form of the sc force in the limit of large @xmath22 can be obtained as @xmath148 which is shown as a black solid line in fig . [ fig : force0 ] . the equilibrium hard - core surface - surface separation @xmath149 tends to zero as @xmath150 as @xmath147 @xcite . note that even for moderate values of the manning parameters , @xmath151 , the sc theory predicts a closely packed _ bound state _ with a relatively small surface - surface separation @xmath152 . let us now consider the situation where the coupling parameter has a finite value . in this case we shall study the system using mc simulations as detailed in appendices [ app : mc ] and [ app : mc_force ] . the mc results for the interaction force between like - charged cylinders ( with no dielectric mismatch ) are shown in fig . [ fig : force0mc ] along with the wc and sc predictions . as seen in fig . [ fig : force0mc]a , the wc results agree with the simulation data for a sufficiently small coupling parameters @xmath153 as expected . furthermore , by increasing the coupling parameter , the mc results start deviating strongly from the wc prediction and tend to the sc prediction , where a reasonable agreement is obtained already at coupling parameters of the order @xmath154 . note that the wc and sc predictions bracket the simulation data and thus establish upper and lower bounds for the interaction force at any realistic value of the coupling parameter . ( a ) 0.25 cm ( b ) ( c ) in figs . [ fig : force0mc]b and c we show the results for larger manning parameters of @xmath155 and 100 , respectively . as manning parameter becomes larger , a larger @xmath10 is required in order to achieve the same level of agreement with the sc prediction at a given separation and thus the convergence to the sc limit becomes weaker . this effect is more pronounced at larger interaxial separations . in fact , as is generally known @xcite , the sc effects become more dominant and the sc theory becomes increasingly more accurate at smaller surface - surface separations . in general , the applicability regime of the sc theory ( obtained in the limit of @xmath18 ) to the situations where the coupling parameter @xmath10 is finite can be specified via simple validity criteria as applied successfully in several previous studies @xcite . in what follows we shall derive the particular form of the sc validity criterion for the case of two like - charged cylinders . it should be noted first that the sc theory ( obtained as an exact asymptotic theory in the limit of @xmath18 ) contains only contributions stemming from the interaction of individual counterions with charged objects and thus the counterion - counterion repulsions and other higher order many - body effects are absent . these effects however become increasingly more important as the coupling parameter is decreased , depending crucially on the precise value of all the system parameters . in the case of two cylinders , as noted before , counterions are mostly accumulated in the intervening region between the two cylinders ( fig . [ fig : densdelta0 ] ) where the typical counterion spacing can be estimated by stipulating the local electroneutrality condition as @xmath156 or in rescaled units as @xmath157 . it is thus evident that as the manning parameter becomes larger at a fixed coupling parameter the spacing between counterions tends to become small . hence , a larger effect due to counterion - counterion repulsions and thus larger deviations from the sc theory would be expected to be observed at larger @xmath22 . in other words , the sc theory is expected to overestimate the counterion density in the intervening region at any _ finite _ value of the coupling parameter , which is consistent with the general result that the sc theory gives the upper bound for the density profile of the counterions @xcite . one can thus identify the validity regime of the sc theory by estimating the counterion - counterion contributions and comparing them with the sinlge - particle counterion - cylinder contribution at a given interaxial separation . this can be done by noting that the ground state configuration ( obtained for @xmath158 and @xmath18 ) is predicted within the sc theory to be the configuration where all counterions are localized between the two cylinders and are lined - up along the @xmath57 axis as obviously favored by the electrostatic interaction energy . when the coupling parameter is reduced to a finite value , repulsions between counterions become more important and some counterions tend to escape from the intervening region to the external side of the cylinders ( shown by an arrow in fig . [ fig : diagrams0]a ) . in order to prevent this from happening , the coupling parameter @xmath10 has to be large enough . by comparing the energy of the ground state with the energy of a single defect obtained by allowing one counterion to move to the external side of one of the cylinders , it follows analytically that for a large @xmath22 and in the absence of image charges , one should have @xmath159 these criteria indeed capture the trends observed in fig . [ fig : force0mc ] when viewed in terms of the three main parameters describing the system , i.e. , @xmath10 , @xmath22 and @xmath93 . they automatically cover the one proposed before based on the surface - surface separation between the cylinders , where one requires that the surface - surface separation between the cylinders must be smaller than the spacing between counterions , @xmath160 , or in rescaled units @xcite @xmath161 this latter criterion is inspired by the observations in the case of charged planar walls where it can indeed be derived from systematic analysis of higher - order corrections to the sc theory @xcite . it can describe the validity regime of the sc predictions for the equilibrium separation between strongly coupled cylinders that form a closely packed bound state @xcite , but when the applicability of the sc theory for the interaction force is considered , the criteria ( [ sccriterion ] ) should be used instead . the difference between the new criteria ( [ sccriterion ] ) and the one in eq . ( [ eq : crit_old ] ) is in fact related to the fundamental difference between the topology of the space available to counterions in the case of two cylinders as compared to two planar walls : in the latter case counterions can not escape " from the intersurface gap and the ground state of the system has a universal two - dimensional configuration @xcite , while in the former the ground state corresponds to a one dimensional arrangement of counterions and the whole space is available for thermal excitations from the ground state . the criteria ( [ sccriterion ] ) are more stringent and cover also the situation where the cylinders are placed at large interaxial separations . the ground state of neutralizing counterions between two charged cylinders ( without the effects of the dielectric mismatch ) has been investigated extensively by arnold and holm in ref . @xcite , where a validity criterion for the sc theory has been proposed as @xmath162 ( when expressed in rescaled units ) based on computer simulations . this agrees with our estimate in eq . ( [ sccriterion ] ) within 16% of the numerical prefactor . let us now turn our attention to the behavior of the equilibrium interaxial separation or the so - called bound - state separation , @xmath144 , where the interaction force between the two cylinders vanishes . as noted before , the sc theory is generally more accurate at smaller separations . a closer inspection of fig . [ fig : force0mc ] shows that the sc prediction for the bound - state separation agrees with the mc data even outside the regime set by the sc criteria ( [ sccriterion ] ) , which reiterates the point discussed above that a less stringent criterion such as eq . ( [ eq : crit_old ] ) would be sufficient to describe the validity of the sc prediction for the bound - state separation . in fig . [ fig : diagrams0]b the bound - state interaxial separation is plotted as a function of the manning parameter , which shows that a reasonable agreement between mc data and the sc theory for this quantity can be achieved for a coupling parameter as small as @xmath163 , in agreement with previous results in ref . as seen in the figure , the bound - state separation diverges ( i.e. , the cylinders unbind ) for manning parameter approaching a minimum value of @xmath164 @xcite below which the two cylinders merely repel each other . figure [ fig : diagrams0]b can be also thought of as a phase diagram identifying the attraction ( the region above the lines ) and repulsion ( the region below the lines ) regimes between two like - charged cylinders in terms of the parameters @xmath144 and @xmath22 for a given coupling parameter @xmath10 . in fig . [ fig : diagrams0]c we show a global phase diagram in terms of the parameters @xmath10 and @xmath22 . the boundary lines are determined from mc simulations ( open symbols ) and separate the region ( above the lines ) where the interaction force becomes attractive at some finite interaxial separation between the cylinders and the region ( under the lines ) where the force never becomes attractive at _ any _ interaxial separation . in other words , the boundary lines themselves correspond to the parameter values where the force - distance diagrams exhibit a global minimum at @xmath165 , i.e. the force curve only touches the abscissa . they were determined by bisection procedure for a series of mc runs . if the cylinder parameter values are chosen to describe dna , we have @xmath166 and @xmath167 for @xmath26 valency counterions , which are shown as solid circles in fig . [ fig : diagrams0]c . this suggests that dna - dna interaction in the case of monovalent counterions falls well within the repulsive region , while with divalent counterions and beyond one can expect to observe an attractive force , in qualitative agreement with recent experiments @xcite . and the dielectric discontinuity parameter @xmath36 at interaxial separtaion @xmath140 . the density is shown across an arbitrary plane perpendicular to the two cylinders in a color - coded fashion as indicated on the graph . the small depletion zone around each cylinder is due to the counterion volume exclusion as counterions are assumed to have a finite radius of @xmath141 . a large depletion zone develops due to the influence of image charges as the coupling parameter increases from @xmath168 to 5000 ( a - d ) . , title="fig : " ] ( a ) @xmath168 and the dielectric discontinuity parameter @xmath36 at interaxial separtaion @xmath140 . the density is shown across an arbitrary plane perpendicular to the two cylinders in a color - coded fashion as indicated on the graph . the small depletion zone around each cylinder is due to the counterion volume exclusion as counterions are assumed to have a finite radius of @xmath141 . a large depletion zone develops due to the influence of image charges as the coupling parameter increases from @xmath168 to 5000 ( a - d ) . , title="fig : " ] ( c ) @xmath169 0.25 cm and the dielectric discontinuity parameter @xmath36 at interaxial separtaion @xmath140 . the density is shown across an arbitrary plane perpendicular to the two cylinders in a color - coded fashion as indicated on the graph . the small depletion zone around each cylinder is due to the counterion volume exclusion as counterions are assumed to have a finite radius of @xmath141 . a large depletion zone develops due to the influence of image charges as the coupling parameter increases from @xmath168 to 5000 ( a - d ) . , title="fig : " ] ( b ) @xmath170 and the dielectric discontinuity parameter @xmath36 at interaxial separtaion @xmath140 . the density is shown across an arbitrary plane perpendicular to the two cylinders in a color - coded fashion as indicated on the graph . the small depletion zone around each cylinder is due to the counterion volume exclusion as counterions are assumed to have a finite radius of @xmath141 . a large depletion zone develops due to the influence of image charges as the coupling parameter increases from @xmath168 to 5000 ( a - d ) . , title="fig : " ] ( d ) @xmath171 ( a ) 0.25 cm ( b ) ( c ) we now consider the case of two charged cylinders with a dielectric core whose dielectric constant may be in general different from that of the surrounding medium . in this case , the induced image charges ( due to the polarization of the dielectric cores ) can play an important role as well . however , as we discussed before ( fig . [ fig : forcedelta_wc ] ) , the image - charge effects turn out to be small in the wc regime where the coupling parameter is small ( e.g. , when counterions are monovalent ) . this may be the reason why such dielectric effects have not yet been throughly investigated in the particular case of two charged cylinders . the situation turns out to be quite different in the opposite limit of strong coupling as we will see in this section . this is tied in with a fundamental difference between counterion distribution in the sc limit as opposed to the wc limit : while in the former limit one deals with highly isolated single counterion close to a charged surface , in the latter limit individual nature of counterions fades in the wake of dominant collective many - body effects ( as counterions form a diffuse and uncorrelated ionic cloud around the cylinders ) and thus the polarization effects are highly reduced . if the dielectric cores have a smaller dielectric constant than the medium ( @xmath84 ) , as relevant to most macromolecules in water , the induced image charges will have the same sign as the counterions and thus tend to cause depletion of counterions from the vicinity of the dielectric cores . this behavior is shown in fig . [ fig : densdelta ] , where the sc density is plotted across an arbitrary plane perpendicular to the two cylinders in a color - coded fashion . as can be seen , the depletion effect is enhanced as the coupling parameter , @xmath10 , is increased such that a large depletion zone " develops that eventually encloses both cylinders . ( note that the sc free energy in the presence of a dielectric discontinuity , eq . ( [ free ] ) , has an explicit dependence on the coupling parameter @xmath10 as already known from the case of planar charged dielectric slabs @xcite ) . in fact , the image depletion at larger couplings turns out to have a similar effect qualitatively as the counterion volume exclusion , i.e. , as if the counterion radius @xmath67 is renormalized to a large effective value . note that the region with highest concentration ( shown in red color ) is squeezed " and eventually splits in two regions shifted away from the common @xmath172 plane that passes through the axes of the two cylinders . the splitting appears when the second derivative of the density ( [ dens2 ] ) with respect to the @xmath173 coordinate becomes positive at the midpoint , @xmath174 . using the small - distance approximation @xmath175 from eq . ( [ eqi ] ) , we can estimate the distance @xmath93 at which the density splitting happens as @xmath176 thus for the manning parameter @xmath155 and at separation @xmath140 , the splitting is estimated to occur at @xmath177 as is the case in fig . [ fig : densdelta ] . in figs . [ fig : forceqdelta]a and b , we show the sc force per unit length ( solid lines ) as obtained from eqs . ( [ free ] ) and ( [ free_to_force ] ) along with the mc simulation results ( symbols ) for two different manning parameters and several different values of the coupling parameter . as seen upon increasing the coupling parameter , the repulsive peak at small separations shifts towards larger values of the interaxial separation @xmath93 , which reflects the emergence of a depletion zone due to repulsions between counterions and their image charges as discussed before . as a result , the main contribution to the inter - cylinder interaction at small separations comes from the bare interaction between the two cylinders and the force is approximately given by the bare repulsion force @xmath178 as given by eq . ( [ f00 ] ) in the appendix ( dashed line , fig . [ fig : forceqdelta]b ) . at larger separations , we still find strong sc - type attraction even in the presence of image charges . one should thus note that in general the repulsive forces are enhanced in the effective interaction in the sc limit especially at small separations as compared to a homogeneous system with no image charges . therefore , unlike in the wc limit ( see fig . [ fig : forcedelta_wc ] ) , the introduction of image charges may lead to qualitative changes in the behavior for a strongly coupled system . in general , the sc results for the interaction force show better agreement with the simulations for larger @xmath10 and smaller separation distances @xmath93 . especially the results for the bound - state interaxial separation show very good agreement between the sc results ( solid lines ) and the mc data ( symbols ) as shown in fig . [ fig : forceqdelta]c ( compare with fig . [ fig : diagrams0]b ) . in plan - parallel geometry the repulsive self - image interaction compresses counterions toward the mid - plane and hence expands the range of the sc regime @xcite . here in the cylindrical geometry such mechanism can not work , since counterions can escape from inter - cylindrical region . therefore , it seems that dielectric image effects do not have a noticable influence on the range of validity of the sc approximation . note that just as in the case with @xmath35 ( blue line in fig . [ fig : diagrams0]c ) , the simulation results show no attraction between the cylinders at too low electrostatic coupling parameters . the attraction can only appear once the coupling parameter exceeds a threshold value . this threshold value is shown as a red line in the global phase diagram in fig . [ fig : diagrams0]c for the dielectric discontinuity parameter @xmath179 . note that bare cylinder - cylinder repulsion is enhanced in the case of images ( @xmath92 ) , eq.([f1 ] ) . therefore , larger coupling parameter @xmath10 is needed to get attraction at smaller manning parameters compared to no - image case ( red line stays above blue for @xmath180 and @xmath36 in fig . [ fig : diagrams0]c ) . for larger manning parameters , the attractive interaction between the counterion image and the cylindrical charges ( represented by the term @xmath181 , eq . ( [ vcross ] ) ) becomes more important and , hence , attraction can appear even at lower coupling parameters ( red line is below the blue line for @xmath182 on fig . [ fig : diagrams0]c ) . we have analyzed the electrostatic interaction between two like - charged cylindrical macromolecules surrounded by counterions . we have in particular examined the role of image charges when the cylinders have a dielectric constant which is different from that of the surrounding medium within the the weak- and strong - coupling frameworks elaborated first by netz and coworkers @xcite . the two limits are defined in terms of a single coupling parameter @xmath10 . the weak coupling limit , or equivalently the mean - field theory , is relevant when the valency of counterions and/or the macromolecule surface charge density is small and/or when the dielectric constant of the medium is large enough . it is based on the poisson - boltzmann equation which turns out to give purely repulsive interactions between two - like charged cylinders . the image - charge effects in this case turn out to be small even at small separations and quickly diminish as the inter - cylinder separation is increased . on the contrary , the strong coupling limit is relevant when the valency of counterions is large and/or the macromolecule surface charge density is large and/or when the dielectric constant of the medium is small enough . the sc approach is based on a single - particle description which is obtained as an exact limiting result for large coupling parameters @xmath18 @xcite . while some aspects of the sc theory for cylindrical macromolecules were studied in previous works @xcite , other aspects have remained unadressed . our work is aimed specifically at addressing the effects due to image charges , which indeed turn out to be quite significant in the sc limit . using a generalized sc theory and extensive mc simulations we have shown that the counterions are strongly depleted away from the cylindrical cores due to repulsion from image charges leading to stronger effective repulsions between the two cylinders at smaller separations . the counterion - mediated attraction will be present at intermediate to large separation when the coupling parameter is sufficiently large . these features are in marked contrast with those obtained with the wc theory . we have mapped a global phase diagram where attractive and repulsive interactions emerge between two like - charged cylinders with or without the image - charge effects . here we have employed a first - order image approximation to deal with the image - charge effects within the sc theory ( note , however , that the numerical scheme used within the wc limit allows to account for the full effect of the dielectric discontinuity ) . generally , the treatment of the image charges in nontrivial geometries becomes very complicated and the two - cylinder model is no exception . the first - order image approximation ( [ vim2 ] ) has the obvious advantage that it allows for an analytical treatment of the system . the study of the full effect due to the dielectric discontinuity in the two - cylinder model requires more advanced numerical and analytical developments that might become available in the future . another interesting effect which can be investigated in the present context is that of the additional salt that may be present besides the neutralizing counterions . recent generalizations @xcite should allow for a systematic study of salt screening effects within the wc - sc framework . r.p . would like to acknowledge the financial support by the slovenian research agency under contract nr . p1 - 0055 ( biophysics of polymers , membranes , gels , colloids and cells ) . m.k . would like to acknowledge the financial support by the slovenian research agency under the young researcher grant . is a newton international fellow . in this section , we explain how the cross energy term ( [ vcross ] ) may be evaluated in the case of two charged cylinders ( section [ subsec : sc_2cyln ] ) . this requires employing some mathematical identities as we shall explain below . note that here the position vectors centered at two different cylinders appear simultaneously , @xmath130 , @xmath184 inserting the image kernel @xmath109 , eq . ( [ vim ] ) , and the cylinder charge density @xmath118 , eq . ( [ n0 ] ) , we first transform the coordinates @xmath127 and @xmath185 centered at the @xmath15-th cylinder to the those centered at the @xmath186-th cylinder using the graf s addition theorems @xcite , @xmath187 with @xmath188 and @xmath189 being integers and @xmath190i_n(k\rho_\nu)\hspace{3ex}\\ c_{mn}(k\rho_\nu)&=&[k_{m+n}(kr)+k_{m - n}(kr)]i_n(k\rho_\nu)\nonumber\\ & & \times\ > ( 1-\frac{1}{2}\delta_{n0}).\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can then carry out the integration in ( [ app : vcross_def ] ) over @xmath191 , @xmath192 and @xmath193 . integration over @xmath193 produces a @xmath194 term , where @xmath195 is the upper limit and thus we obtain @xmath196 in the next step we integrate over the wave - vector @xmath197 , where the integrand contains the rapidly oscillating factor @xmath198 , which supresses contributions of the integrand in whole the range , except at @xmath199 . formally , we use the following mathematical identity @xmath200 where @xmath201 is the residue of function @xmath202 at @xmath203 . this integral is finite only if @xmath202 behaves as @xmath204 for @xmath205 and goes to 0 for @xmath206 . this statement can be proven by considering the split of function @xmath202 into a @xmath204 term and a remainder , i.e. , @xmath207 . the first part can be integrated straightforwardly , whearas the remainder yields 0 according to the riemann - lebesgue lemma @xcite . this finally leads us to @xmath208 which may be simplified further using the identity @xmath209\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] and yields the result given in eq . ( [ vcross ] ) . we performed monte - carlo simulations in order to study the system of one and two charged dielectric cylinders at arbitrary coupling parameters , which thus go beyond the weak and strong coupling theories . all simultations were performed in the canonical ensemble ( @xmath210 ) using standard metropolis algorithm @xcite . in the case of one charged cylinder the system ( including the neutralizing counterions ) is enclosed in a cylindrical simulation box of outer radius @xmath211 whereas in the case of two cylinders the system is enclosed in a square box of lateral size @xmath96 ( wc ) and 100 ( sc ) ( note that in this work we focus on the regime of large manning parameters where the lateral size and shape of the confining box becomes unimportant @xcite ) . the simulation box height is assumed to have a finite value @xmath212 , which in terms of other physical parameters by invoking the global electroneutrality condition : in the case of a single cylinder it is given by @xmath213 , and in the case of two cylinders @xmath214 . we use periodic boundary conditions in the @xmath57 direction by replicating the main simulation box infinitely many times in that direction . the energy of the system for a given configuration of the cylinder(s ) is composed of two main parts @xmath215 the first term is the counterion - cylinder interaction energy as given by eqs . ( [ eq_w0c ] ) and ( [ eq : w0c_two ] ) in the text . the second term in ( [ total_en ] ) is counterion - counterion interaction energy which includes also the contribution from interactions with counterion image charges . due to the periodic boundary conditions used in the simulations , this latter term involves infinite summation series @xcite . this is because the counterions and image charges in the main simulation box interact also with their periodic copies " as obtained by the replication of the main simulation box to an infinite number of simulation box copies . these summations can be evaluated as explained in the forthcoming sections . the interaction energy between two given counterions @xmath216 and @xmath217 can be written as @xmath218 the first equation corresponds to the hard - core repulsion between two counterions overlapping counterions . the second equation gives the image self - energy of the @xmath216-th counterion , i.e. , it takes into account the interaction of a given counterion with its dielectrically induced images in the polarizable dielectric core . the third equation in ( [ ionion ] ) gives the interaction between two different counterions @xmath216 and @xmath217 . it is written as the sum of two different contributions which will be calculated below : i ) the coulomb interaction , @xmath219 , between the @xmath216-th ( located at @xmath220 ) and the @xmath217-th counterions and all its periodic copies ( located at @xmath221 for integer @xmath222 ) , @xmath223 and ii ) the contribution involving interactions with the dielectrically induced image charges @xmath224 that will be defined later in this appendix . the first contribution @xmath219 can be written as @xmath225 where we have introduced two different summation schemes depending on the radial separation @xmath226 between the two position vectors @xmath220 and @xmath227 in order to increase the convergence of the sum over the long - range electrostatic interactions . if radial distance @xmath228 is smaller than a threshold @xmath229 , we first sum up @xmath230 terms directly and then use an approximation to estimate the remaining part of the series ( from @xmath231 to infinity ) . we refer to this as the direct " summation scheme . this method is different from the so - called sperb @xcite summation scheme which involves calculating various special functions . for our purposes of relative precision up to @xmath232 we found it more efficient and can be made in principle as accurate as necessary . it follows as @xmath233 where the last sum over @xmath234 is equal to @xmath235 , where @xmath236 is digamma function , and needs to be calculated only once in the course of the simulations . the term @xmath237 is defined as @xmath238 this scheme gives an error of the order @xmath239 . for larger radial separations ( @xmath240 ) , we use the so - called lekner summation scheme @xcite as it converges more rapidly . it is given by @xmath241 where @xmath242 accounts for the offset generated at the threshold , i.e. , @xmath243 we choose the threshold value as @xmath244 and use a cut off of @xmath245 in the direct scheme and sum up to @xmath246 $ ] terms in the lekner scheme , which give a relative error smaller than @xmath232 . let us now consider the second contribution that enters eq . ( [ ionion ] ) , i.e. , @xmath247 , which is the interaction energy obtained by summing up all contributions that involve dielectrically induced image charges throughout different periodic copies of the main simulation box along the @xmath57 axis . it can be written in the case of one cylinder as @xmath248 where @xmath249 is a unit vector pointing in @xmath250 direction . inserting the image kernel ( [ vim ] ) into the above equation , one ends up with an infinite summation of terms including @xmath251 , which can be expressed in terms of @xmath252 functions , i.e. , @xmath253 this enables us to simply integrate over the wave - vector variable @xmath197 and thus obtain @xmath254 where @xmath255 . the @xmath256 term needs to be handled carefully by taking the limit @xmath257 as @xmath258 using the summation identity as used in eq . ( [ app : vcross_2 ] ) , we find the final expression @xmath259+\nonumber\\ & & + \frac{4}{l_z}\sum_{m=0}^\infty\sum_{n=1}^\infty\xi_{m}(k_n a)k_m(k_n\rho_i)k_m(k_n\rho_j)\nonumber\\ & & \times\>\cos\ , k_n\delta z\ , \cos\ , m\delta \varphi . \label{app : imagesum}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this expression is the most computationally expensive part of the simulations , and its efficiency decreases for @xmath260 , i.e. , for counterions near the cylindrical core . in the simulations we truncate these summations in such a way that the relative cut - off error is less than @xmath261 . in the case of two cylinders , we use the first - order image approximation in the simulations as well , and thus the image - charge contributions are simply the sum of the contributions for each cylinder separately , i.e. , @xmath262 where indices 1 and 2 represent coordinates centered at the first and the second cylinder , respectively . in this section , we explain the method used to directly evaluate the force between two charged cylinders within mc simulations . the force acting on a given cylinder ( say cylinder 1 ) is composed of three contributions , @xmath263 where @xmath178 is the bare electrostatic force due to the interaction with the other cylinder , @xmath264 , is the electrostatic force due to the interaction of the cylinder with the @xmath216-th counterion ( summed over all counterions @xmath265 ) , and @xmath266 is the force due to the osmotic pressure from the @xmath216-th counterion . the first contribution follows from the interaction energy @xmath103 , eq . ( [ w00_delta ] ) , as @xmath267 which gives @xmath268 the second contribution follows by differentiating @xmath104 , eq . ( [ eq : w0c_two ] ) , with respect to @xmath93 by assuming that the cylinder 1 and the @xmath269-th counterion are fixed , i.e. , @xmath270 which after some algebra gives @xmath271.\qquad\ ] ] here @xmath272 and @xmath273 are the radial distance and the azimuthal angle of the @xmath216-th counterion position with respect to cylinder 1 , and @xmath274 and @xmath275 are the corresponding coordinates with respect to the shifted axis by @xmath132 from the axis of cylinder 1 toward the axis of the cylinder 2 , fig . [ fig : model_2cyln ] . similar definitions apply to @xmath276 , @xmath277 , @xmath278 and @xmath279 . the osmotic ( third ) term in eq . ( [ force ] ) results from the collisions of counterions with the cylinder . this contribution amounts to a pressure of counterions exerted on the cylinder surface , which is proportional to the contact density of counterions at the cylinder surface @xmath280 . thus the infinitesimal force acting on the cylinder is given by @xmath281 . note that the contact counterion density @xmath282 is given by the number of counterions inside a small box of dimensions @xmath283 next to the cylindrical surface . the total osmotic force of all ions in simulation cell is then @xmath284 where @xmath285 is the heaviside step function which is @xmath286 only if the @xmath216-th counterion falls inside a shell thickness @xmath287 from the cylinder surface . the above procedure in principle gives the exact value of the osmotic force when @xmath288 . it also gives a convenient method to calculate the osmotic contribution within mc simulations by evaluating the force for different values of the shell thickness and estimating the limiting value by extrapolation . r. r. netz , eur . j. e * 5 * , 557 ( 2001 ) ; a. g. moreira and r. r. netz , _ ibid _ * 8 * , 33 ( 2002 ) ; phys . lett * 87 * , 078301 ( 2001 ) ; europhys . lett . * 52 * , 705 ( 2000 ) ; _ ibid _ * 57 * , 911 ( 2002 ) . r. h. french , v. a. parsegian , r. podgornik _ et al . ( 2010)in press . l. guldbrand , b. jnsson , h. wennerstrm , and p. linse , j. chem . phys . * 80 * , 2221 ( 1984 ) ; d. bratko , b. jnsson , and h. wennerstrm , chem . lett . * 128 * , 449 ( 1986 ) ; j. p. valleau , r. ivkov , and g. m. torrie , j. chem . phys . * 95 * , 520 ( 1991 ) ; r. kjellander , t. kesson , b. jnsson , and s. marelja , j. chem . phys . * 97 * , 1424 ( 1992 ) . a. naji and r. podgornik , phys . e , 2005 , * 72 * 041402 ; r. podgornik and a. naji , europhys . letts . , 2006 , * 74 * , 712 ; y. s. mamasakhlisov , a. naji , and r. podgornik , j. stat . phys . * 133 * , 659 ( 2008 ) ; a. naji _ et al . _ , phys . rev . * 104 * , 060601 ( 2010 ) . stevens , m.o . robbins , europhys . lett . * 12 * , 81 ( 1990 ) . a. diehl , m.n . tamashiro , m.c . barbosa , y. levin , physica a * 274 * , 433 ( 1999 ) ; m.c . barbosa , m. deserno , c. holm , europhys . * 52 * , 80 ( 2000 ) . kornyshev , s. leikin , j. chem . phys . * 107 * , 3656 ( 1997 ) ; phys . lett . * 82 * , 4138 ( 1999 ) . arenzon , j.f . stilck , y. levin , eur . j. b * 12 * , 79 ( 1999 ) ; y. levin , j.j . arenzon , j.f . stilck , phys . . lett . * 83 * , 2680 ( 1999 ) ; a. diehl , h.a . carmona , y. levin , phys . e * 64 * , 011804 ( 2001 ) . henle , c.d . santangelo , d.m . patel , p.a . pincus , europhys . lett . * 66 * , 284 ( 2004 ) . m. manghi and r. r. netz , eur . j. e * 14 * , 67 ( 2004 ) s. liu , m. muthukumar , j. chem . phys . * 116 * , 9975 ( 2002 ) ; s. liu , k. ghosh , m. muthukumar , j. chem . phys . * 119 * , 1813 ( 2003 ) . m. muthukumar , j. chem . phys . * 120 * , 9343 ( 2004 ) . d. chapot , l. bocquet , e.trizac , j. chem . phys . * 120 * , 3969 ( 2004 ) a. g. cherstvy , j. phys . chem . b * 111 * , 12933 ( 2007 ) ; j. phys . : condens . matter * 17 * , 1363 ( 2005 ) . we make use of the commercial software comsol multiphysics which employes a finite element mesh approach in order to solve the nonlinear pb equation in the two - cylinder geometry ( http://www.comsol.com ) . Abstract:
[ "we examine the effective counterion - mediated electrostatic interaction between two like - charged dielectric cylinders immersed in a continuous dielectric medium containing neutralizing mobile counterions . we focus on the effects of image charges induced as a result of the dielectric mismatch between the cylindrical cores and the surrounding dielectric medium and investigate the counterion - mediated electrostatic interaction between the cylinders in both limits of weak and strong electrostatic couplings ( corresponding , e.g. , to systems with monovalent and multivalent counterions , respectively ) . the results are compared with extensive monte - carlo simulations exhibiting good agreement with the limiting weak and strong coupling results in their respective regime of validity ." ]
13,704
13,704
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the _ knot complement problem _ , first proposed in 1908 by heinrich tietze ( * ? ? ? * section 15 ) , asks when a knot in a given @xmath0-manifold is determined by its complement . it had been open for eighty years until in 1989 gordon and luecke @xcite proved it to be true for every knot in @xmath1 . a first step in this proof was to translate this problem into a problem concerning _ dehn surgery_. in sections [ section : complement]-[section : proof ] we recall the basic facts about the knot complement problem and dehn surgery . here i want to consider the same problem for _ legendrian knots _ in _ contact @xmath0-manifolds_. the main result is a generalization of the result by gordon and luecke , roughly speaking it says the following ( see theorem [ thm : contact1 ] in section [ section : contactcomplement ] for the precise statement ) . [ legendrian knot exterior theorem ] [ main : main1 ] + a legendrian knot in the tight contact structure of @xmath1 is determined by the contactomorphism type of its exterior . this result implies that all invariants of legendrian knots are actually invariants of the contactomorphism type of its exterior . the legendrian knot complement problem was also mentioned in @xcite . in sections [ section : contactcomplement]-[section : contactproof ] i recall the definition of _ contact dehn surgery _ and explain how to generalize the proof of gordon - luecke to this setting . the main ingredient for this is the fact that if there is a non - trivial contact dehn surgery along a legendrian knot in @xmath2 resulting again in @xmath2 , then this legendrian knot has to be a legendrian unknot of a very special type . an easy way to prove this fact ( given in section [ section : appendix ] ) is looking at all other contact surgeries resulting topologically again in @xmath1 and finding a legendrian knot in its exterior that violates the bennequin inequality after the surgery . therefore , i present in section [ section : loss ] a new formula to compute the thurston - bennequin invariant of such legendrian knots in the surgered manifold . moreover , in section [ counterexample ] i explain how to do a crossing change in a legendrian knot diagram with help of a contact dehn surgery ( a so called _ contact rolfsen twist _ ) . with that it is easy to construct counterexamples to the legendrian link exterior problem in the tight contact structure of @xmath1 , i.e. two non - equivalent legendrian links with contactomorphic exteriors . finally , in section [ topgenmfd ] and [ section : other ] i give a short discussion about the legendrian knot exterior problem in other manifolds . it turns out that in the topological setting the knot complement problem in a general manifold is equivalent to the non - existence of an _ exotic cosmetic dehn surgery _ resulting in this manifold . in the contact setting it is not clear if this equivalence is true . but in section [ section : other ] i present examples of legendrian knots in lens spaces not determined by their complements and of _ exotic cosmetic contact dehn surgeries_. all links are assumed to be tame and considered up to ( coarse ) equivalence . + let @xmath3 and @xmath4 be two links in an oriented closed @xmath0-manifold @xmath5 . then @xmath3 is * ( coarse ) equivalent * to @xmath4 , if there exists a homeomorphism @xmath6 of @xmath5 @xmath7 that maps @xmath3 to @xmath4 . then one writes @xmath8 . + the ( coarse ) equivalence is a weaker condition than the equivalence of knots up to isotopy . for example there is a reflection of @xmath1 that maps the left handed trefoil to the right handed trefoil , so this two knots are ( coarse ) equivalent , but one can show that the left handed trefoil is not isotopic to the right handed trefoil ( i.e. there is no such homeomorphism isotopic to the identity ) . one also can consider the * oriented ( coarse ) equivalence * , that means equivalence where only orientation preserving homeomorphisms of @xmath5 are allowed . in @xmath1 oriented equivalence is equivalent to isotopy ( because in @xmath1 every orientation preserving homeomorphism is isotopic to the identity ) , but in general this is a weaker condition than isotopy . a first observation is , that if two links @xmath3 and @xmath4 are equivalent , then the complements are homeomorphic . the following question is called the * link complement problem * ( or for one component links , the * knot complement problem * ) : + are two links in the same manifold with homeomorphic complements equivalent ? link complements are non - compact , but often it is much easier to work with compact manifolds . therefore , pick some regular ( closed ) neighborhood @xmath9 of a link @xmath10 in @xmath5 and call the complement @xmath11 of the interior @xmath12 of these neighborhood the * exterior * of @xmath10 . the corresponding problem whether the equivalence class of a link is determined by the homeomorphism type of its exterior is called the * link exterior problem*. ( actually , this was the problem asked by tietze in ( * ? ? ? * section 15 ) . ) by work of edwards ( * ? ? ? * theorem 3 ) this two problems are equivalent . + the first counterexample was given in 1937 by whitehead @xcite . he considered the following two links @xmath3 and @xmath4 in @xmath1 , now called * whitehead links * , see figure [ fig : whitehead ] . if one deletes one component out of @xmath3 then the remaining knot is an unknot . but if one deletes the unknot @xmath13 out of @xmath4 then the remaining knot is a trefoil . so @xmath3 can not be equivalent to @xmath4 . but the exteriors of this links are homeomorphic , as one can see as follows : consider the exteriors @xmath14 of the unknot @xmath13 . then cut open this @xmath0-manifold along the seifert disk of the unknot @xmath13 , make a full @xmath15-twist and re - glue the two disks together again . this is called a * rolfsen twist * and describes a homeomorphism of the link exteriors . by twisting several times along @xmath13 one can even get infinitely many non - equivalent links all with homeomorphic exteriors . the next natural question would be to ask if this holds on the level of knots . this is the so called knot complement theorem by gordon - luecke @xcite . [ knot complement theorem by gordon - luecke ] [ thm : gordon - luecke1 ] + let @xmath16 and @xmath17 be two knots in @xmath1 with homeomorphic complements , then @xmath16 is equivalent to @xmath17 . a starting point for proving this theorem , was to translate it into a problem concerning dehn surgery . in this section i recall the definition of dehn surgery , which is a very effective construction method for @xmath0-manifolds ( for more information see ( * ? ? ? * chapter vi ) or ( * ? ? ? * chapter 9 ) ) . roughly speaking one cuts out the neighborhood of a knot and glues a solid torus back in a different way to obtain a new @xmath0-manifold . more precisely : + let @xmath18 be a knot in a closed oriented @xmath0-manifold @xmath5 . take a non - trivial simple closed curve @xmath19 on @xmath20 and a homeomorphism @xmath21 , such that @xmath22 then define @xmath23 one says that @xmath24 is obtained out of @xmath5 by * dehn surgery * along @xmath18 with * slope * @xmath19 . one can easily show that @xmath24 is again a @xmath0-manifold independent of the choice of @xmath21 ( see ( * ? ? ? * chapter 9.f ) ) . so to specify @xmath24 one only has to describe the knot @xmath18 ( in the @xmath0-manifold @xmath5 ) together with the slope @xmath19 . to do this effectively one observes that there are two special kinds of curves on @xmath25 : * the * meridian * @xmath26 : a simple closed curve on @xmath27 , that is non - trivial on @xmath27 , but trivial in @xmath28 . * the * longitudes * @xmath29 : simple closed curves on @xmath27 , that are non - trivial on @xmath27 and intersect @xmath26 transversely exactly once . the curves shall be oriented in such a way , that the pair @xmath30 represents the positive orientation of @xmath27 in @xmath5 . one can show that the meridian @xmath26 is up to isotopy uniquely determined . but for the longitudes there are different choices . for a given longitude @xmath29 there are infinitely many other longitudes given by @xmath31 , for @xmath32 . given such a longitude @xmath29 one can write @xmath19 uniquely as @xmath33 + i want to describe surgeries along the unknot @xmath13 in @xmath1 . in this case there is a special longitude on @xmath34 . to see this observe that the exterior @xmath35 is again homeomorphic to a solid torus @xmath36 , this corresponds to the trivial genus-@xmath37 heegaard splitting of @xmath1 ( see for example ( * ? ? ? * example 8.5 . ) ) . write @xmath38 then choose the so called * surface longitude * @xmath39 of @xmath40 to be the meridian @xmath41 of @xmath42 ( see for example ( * ? ? ? * figure 8.7 . ) ) . so for surgeries along the unknot in @xmath1 one can write the slope @xmath19 uniquely as @xmath43 . now i want to show that @xmath44 is homeomorphic to @xmath1 . therefore , one first considers the so called * trivial dehn surgery * @xmath45 , where one cuts out a neighborhood of the knot and glues it back in the same way as before . so the manifold is not changing , and in this case it is again @xmath1 . then the idea is to do again a rolfsen twist along the unknot to obtain a homeomorphism from @xmath46 to @xmath47 . therefore , consider the diagram that will be specified in the following . + + ( 5,40)*+s^3=``a'';(11,40)*+=``a1 '' ; ( 20,40)*+s^3_u(_1)=``b '' ; ( 32,40)*+:==``b1 '' ; ( 45,40)*+s^1d^2=``c '' ; ( 75,40)*++=``d '' ; ( 102,40)*+t_2=``e'';(115,40)*+/_~=``e1'';(47,35)*+_0=``f '' ; ( 100,35)*+_1=``g'';(47,30)*+_0=``h '' ; ( 100,30)*+_1=``i'';(47,10)*+_0=``j '' ; ( 100,10)*+_1=``k'';(75,20)*+=``k1'';(47,5)*+_0=``l '' ; ( 95,5)*+_1+q_1=``m'';(20,0)*+s^3_u(_1+q_1)=``n'';(34,0)*+:==``n1 '' ; ( 45,0)*+s^1d^2=``o '' ; ( 75,0)*++=``p '' ; ( 102,0)*+t_2=``q'';(115,0)*+/_~=``q1'';@ > _ `` b'';``n'';@->@/_1pc/ _ `` c'';``o'';@->@/^1pc/^h `` e'';``q'';@|->__1 `` f'';``g'';@|- > `` h'';``i'';@|->__2 `` j'';``k'';@|- > `` l'';``m '' ; + + first one chooses the gluing maps @xmath48 such that they map the meridians @xmath49 as determined by the slope . by this the manifolds are fixed , but the maps @xmath48 are not . there are many possibilities to what a longitude @xmath50 can map , but the homeomorphism type of the resulting manifold is not affected by this . in this example one can choose the maps @xmath48 such that they map @xmath50 to @xmath39 . to construct a homeomorphism between the two resulting manifolds , one uses on the @xmath36-factor the identity map . if one finds a homeomorphism @xmath51 of the @xmath42-factor such that the diagram commutes , then this two maps fit together to a homeomorphism of the whole manifolds . for the map @xmath51 one can choose a @xmath52-fold dehn - twist of the solid torus @xmath42 , i.e. @xmath53 so the diagram gives rise to a homeomorphism between the two manifolds . + for all other surgeries along the unknot one computes the homology as @xmath54 so the surgeries from the above example are the only surgeries along the unknot that lead again to @xmath1 . in fact , these are the only non - trivial surgeries along an arbitrary knot in @xmath1 that yield again @xmath1 , as the following deep theorem shows . [ surgery theorem by gordon - luecke][thm : gordon - luecke2 ] + let @xmath18 be a knot in @xmath1 . if @xmath55 is homeomorphic to @xmath1 for @xmath56 , then @xmath18 is equivalent to the unknot @xmath13 . see @xcite the knot complement theorem [ thm : gordon - luecke1 ] now follows from the surgery theorem [ thm : gordon - luecke2 ] . the idea is to see a dehn surgery not as cutting out a solid torus and gluing it back in a different way . now one sees a dehn surgery as cutting out the complement of a solid torus , then doing a homeomorphism of this complement and then glue this complement back in a different way . to be more precise choose a homeomorphism @xmath57 and write @xmath58 where the gluing map is @xmath59 . then consider the surgery along @xmath17 with respect to the composition of maps @xmath60 to determine the homeomorphism type of this new manifold @xmath61 look at the following diagram : + + ( 10,40)*+s^3=``a'';(15,40)*+=``a1 '' ; ( 25,40)*+s^3_k_1 ( _ 1)=``b '' ; ( 35,40)*+:==``b1 '' ; ( 45,40)*+s^1d^2=``c '' ; ( 75,40)*++=``d '' ; ( 102,40)*+s^3=``e'';(115,40)*+/_~=``e1'';(47,35)*+_0=``f '' ; ( 100,35)*+_1=``g'';(75,20)*+=``k1'';(47,5)*+_0=``l '' ; ( 94,5)*+r_2=h(_1)=``m'';(25,0)*+s^3_k_2(r_2)=``n'';(35,0)*+:==``n1 '' ; ( 45,0)*+s^1d^2=``o '' ; ( 75,0)*++=``p '' ; ( 102,0)*+s^3=``q'';(115,0)*+/_~=``q1'';@>_f `` b'';``n'';@->@/_1pc/ _ `` c'';``o'';@->@/^1pc/^h `` e'';``q'';@|->__1 `` f'';``g'';@|->^h_1 `` l'';``m '' ; + + with similar arguments as in the example in section [ section : surgery ] this induces a homeomorphism @xmath6 from @xmath62 to @xmath61 and with the surgery theorem [ thm : gordon - luecke2 ] it follows that @xmath63 is equal to @xmath41 or @xmath17 is equivalent to the unknot @xmath13 . if @xmath64 , then the surgery @xmath61 is the trivial surgery , so the spines @xmath65 of the new solid tori are equal to the knots @xmath66 . therefore @xmath6 sends @xmath16 to @xmath17 . in the other case ( @xmath67 ) one does the same thing again but with @xmath16 and @xmath17 reversed , then it follows that @xmath68 . @xmath69 + exactly the same works also with orientations . the dehn surgery theorem [ thm : gordon - luecke2 ] also holds for oriented homeomorphism from @xmath55 to @xmath1 and oriented equivalence from @xmath18 to @xmath13 . then exactly the same proof as before shows that two knots with orientation preserving homeomorphic complements are orientation preserving equivalent . for @xmath1 this is the same as isotopic knots ( see also section [ section : complement ] ) . now i want to generalize this proof to the case of * legendrian knots * in the unique tight contact structure @xmath70 on @xmath1 , i.e. the tangent line to the knots lies always in the @xmath71-plane field given by the contact structure ( see @xcite for all basics about contact geometry and legendrian knots ) . i want to consider legendrian links up to ( coarse ) equivalence like in section [ section : complement ] and i only consider cooriented contact structures . + let @xmath3 and @xmath4 be two legendrian links in a closed contact @xmath0-manifold @xmath72 . then @xmath3 is * ( coarse ) equivalent * to @xmath4 if there exists a contactomorphism @xmath6 of @xmath5 @xmath73 that maps @xmath3 to @xmath4 . then one writes @xmath8 . + the ( coarse ) equivalence is in general a weaker condition than the equivalence given by legendrian isotopy ( for example in overtwisted contact structures on @xmath1 ) . but one can show that in @xmath2 this two concepts are the same ( see ( * ? ? ? * section 4.3 ) ) . it is a standard fact that every legendrian knot @xmath18 in a general contact @xmath0-manifold @xmath72 has a so called * standard neighborhood * @xmath28 in @xmath72 which is contactomorphic to @xmath74 with @xmath75-coordinate @xmath76 and cartesian coordinates @xmath77 on @xmath78 . this contactomorphism maps @xmath18 to @xmath79 ( see ( * ? ? ? * example 2.5.10 ) ) . it is easy to show that the boundary of this standard neighborhood is a convex surface . when i write @xmath28 for a legendrian knot @xmath18 , i always mean that @xmath28 is such a standard neighborhood and analogously to section [ section : complement ] i call the complement @xmath80 of the interior of such a standard neighborhood the * exterior * of the legendrian knot @xmath18 . but for contact manifolds there is the following problem . if @xmath81 is contactomorphic to @xmath82 , is then also @xmath83 contactomorphic to @xmath84 ? again , two equivalent legendrian links have contactomorphic exteriors . i want to show that for legendrian knots in @xmath2 the converse also holds . but this time it is not clear if this also holds for the complements . [ legendrian knot exterior theorem ] [ thm : contact1 ] + let @xmath16 and @xmath17 be two legendrian knots in @xmath2 with contactomorphic exteriors . then @xmath16 is equivalent to @xmath17 . + here @xmath16 and @xmath17 are understood to be unoriented legendrian knots , because the exterior of a knot can not see its orientation . but if one fixes an oriented longitude of the knot in its exterior , the same result holds also for oriented legendrian knots . for legendrian links the theorem is in general wrong . in section [ counterexample ] i will give some examples of legendrian links in @xmath2 that are * not * determined by the contactomorphism type of their exteriors . to generalize the proof from the first sections to legendrian knots in contact manifolds , i first want to recall the definition of contact dehn surgery along legendrian knots developed by ding and geiges in @xcite . + let @xmath18 be a legendrian knot in a contact @xmath0-manifold @xmath72 . then there is a distinguished , so called * contact longitude * @xmath29 on @xmath20 , given by pushing @xmath18 in a direction transverse to the contact planes , for example in the direction of the reeb vector field . when nothing else is said , from now on @xmath29 denotes always this contact longitude . it is easy to show that for a slope @xmath85 the surgered manifold @xmath24 is determined by the rational number @xmath86 , called the * ( contact ) surgery coefficient * ( see for example ( * ? ? ? * section 9.g ) ) . sometimes it will be necessary to express the slope @xmath19 with respect to the surface longitude @xmath87 , i.e. @xmath88 , then the rational number @xmath89 is called the * ( topological ) surgery coefficient*. ( recall that the surface longitude for a nullhomologous knot is obtained by pushing the knot into one of its seifert surfaces . ) from now on , depending on the context , i will denote by @xmath19 the slope or the corresponding surgery coefficient . now one wants to do dehn surgery along legendrian links with respect to this contact longitude . one can show that the contact structure of the old manifold extends to a contact structure of the resulting manifold . + let @xmath18 be a legendrian knot in a contact @xmath0-manifold @xmath72 . + ( 1 ) then @xmath24 carries a contact structure @xmath90 , which coincides with the old contact structure @xmath91 on @xmath92 . + ( 2 ) for @xmath93 one can choose @xmath90 to be tight on the new glued - in solid torus . + ( 3 ) for @xmath94 this tight contact structure on this new solid torus is unique . + one says @xmath95 is obtained from @xmath72 by * contact dehn surgery * along the legendrian knot @xmath18 with slope @xmath19 . [ sketch of proof ] + the neighborhood @xmath28 is chosen such that the boundary is a convex surface . the germ of a contact structure along a convex surface is determined by some simple data on that surface . therefore , it is easy to glue contact structures along convex surfaces . tight contact structures on solid tori with prescribed boundary conditions have been classified by honda @xcite . in particular , such a contact structure always exists if @xmath93 and is unique if @xmath94 . but in general there are more possibilities to choose this contact structure , so for other slopes the result of contact dehn surgery is in general not unique . for details see @xcite or @xcite . + consider the contact surgery along the legendrian unknot with @xmath96 and surgery coefficient @xmath97 ( see figure [ fig : exoticsurgery ] ) . the surgery coefficient @xmath97 corresponds then to the slope @xmath98 , where @xmath29 denotes the contact longitude . by expressing this slope with respect to the surface longitude @xmath39 given by the meridian of the complementary solid torus one gets @xmath99 . so the resulting manifold is by the example from section [ section : surgery ] topologically again @xmath1 . next i want to show that the resulting contact structure is unique and leads again to @xmath70 ( if one requires the contact structure on the new glued - in solid torus to be tight ) . in general a contact dehn surgery with surgery coefficient not of the form @xmath100 is not unique . but actually in this example it is . too see this , one first uses the algorithm in ( * ? ? ? * section 1 ) ( see also @xcite ) to change the contact surgery diagram into contact surgeries along a link with only @xmath101 surgery coefficients ( see figure [ fig : exoticsurgery ] ) . observe that different choices of stabilizations lead in general to different contact structures ( and correspond exactly to the different contact structures on the glued - in solid torus ) , but in this case the resulting contact structures are contactomorphic . the contactomorphism of the resulting manifold is induced by the contactomorphism @xmath102 of the old @xmath2 , that maps one link to the other ( see also ( * ? ? ? * section 9 ) ) . to see that this contact structure is really @xmath70 , it is enough to show that the contact structure is stein fillable . in ( * lemma 4.2 . ) it is shown , that @xmath103-contact dehn surgery along the legendrian unknot with @xmath96 leads to @xmath104 with the unique stein fillable contact structure on it . because @xmath105-contact dehn surgery preserves stein fillability the claim follows . to prove the legendrian knot exterior theorem [ thm : contact1 ] i generalize the surgery theorem by gordon - luecke [ thm : gordon - luecke2 ] . [ contact dehn surgery theorem][thm : contact2 ] + let @xmath18 be a legendrian knot in @xmath2 . if @xmath106 is contactomorphic to @xmath2 for @xmath56 then @xmath18 is equivalent to a legendrian unknot @xmath107 with @xmath108 and @xmath109 . + ( 1 ) the classification of legendrian unknots in @xmath2 by eliashberg - fraser @xcite says , that two such legendrian unknots are equivalent ( with orientations of the knots ) if and only if they have the same @xmath110 and @xmath111 . of course the exterior of a knot can not see its orientation , which for legendrian knots is given by the sign of @xmath111 . so the knots @xmath107 are unique up to equivalence ( of unoriented legendrian knots ) . a front projection of a legendrian unknot of type @xmath107 is shown in figure [ fig : legendreunknoten ] . + ( 2 ) for general slopes the contact structure @xmath90 is not unique . so one should read theorem [ thm : contact2 ] as follows : if there is a contact structure @xmath90 on @xmath55 , such that @xmath106 is obtained from @xmath72 by contact dehn surgery along @xmath18 with slope @xmath19 and if @xmath106 is contactomorphic to @xmath2 for @xmath56 , then the conclusion holds . the proof of this contact dehn surgery theorem [ thm : contact2 ] is given in section [ section : appendix ] . the proof of the legendrian knot exterior theorem [ thm : contact1 ] is now similar to the topological case . pick a contactomorphism @xmath112 and then consider again the following diagram : + + ( 0,40)*+(s^3,_st)=``a'';(8,40)*+=``a1 '' ; ( 24,40)*+(s^3_k_1 ( _ 1),_k_1 ( _ 1))=``b '' ; ( 40,40)*+:==``b1 '' ; ( 52,40)*+(s^1d^2,_1)=``c '' ; ( 75,40)*++=``d '' ; ( 100,40)*+(s^3,_st)=``e'';(114,40)*+/_~=``e1'';(53,35)*+_0=``f '' ; ( 99,35)*+_1=``g'';(75,20)*+=``k1'';(53,5)*+_0=``l '' ; ( 92,5)*+r_2:=h(_1)=``m'';(24,0)*+(s^3_k_2 ( r_2),_k_2 ( r_2))=``n'';(40,0)*+:==``n1 '' ; ( 52,0)*+(s^1d^2,_1)=``o '' ; ( 75,0)*++=``p '' ; ( 100,0)*+(s^3,_st)=``q'';(114,0)*+/_~=``q1'';@>_f `` b'';``n'';@->@/_1pc/ _ `` c'';``o'';@->@/^1pc/^h `` e'';``q'';@|->__1 `` f'';``g'';@|->^h_1 `` l'';``m '' ; + + here the contact structure @xmath113 denotes the unique tight contact structure on @xmath36 with convex boundary corresponding to the slope @xmath114 . because the contactomorphisms @xmath115 and @xmath51 on the two factors agree on the boundary convex surfaces , which determine the germ of the contact structures , these two maps glue together to a contactomorphism @xmath6 of the whole contact manifolds . from the contact dehn surgery theorem [ thm : contact2 ] it follows that @xmath63 is equal to @xmath41 or @xmath17 is equivalent to @xmath107 for some @xmath116 . if @xmath64 then this is the trivial contact dehn surgery , and so the contactomorphism @xmath6 maps @xmath16 to @xmath17 . in the other case one makes the same argument with @xmath16 and @xmath17 reversed and concludes that @xmath16 is equivalent to @xmath117 for some @xmath118 . again the classification result of eliashberg - fraser @xcite implies that @xmath119 is equivalent to @xmath120 if and only if @xmath121 . to show the last statement one observes that @xmath122 is a solid torus with tight contact structure and convex boundary . therefore , one can compute @xmath123 also as half the number of intersection points of the seifert disk of @xmath107 with the dividing set of the convex boundary ( see ( * ? ? ? * theorem 2.30 ) ) . because the seifert disks of @xmath107 and @xmath117 are both given by the @xmath78-factors of the exterior solid tori and because the exteriors are contactomorphic , the number of intersection points stays the same . to prove the contact dehn surgery theorem [ thm : contact2 ] one first determines with the surgery theorem by gordon - luecke [ thm : gordon - luecke2 ] all surgeries that lead again to @xmath1 . the main problem is then that there are always many different choices for extending the contact structure over the new glued - in solid torus . but a very simple proof can be given by finding some new legendrian knots in the exteriors of the surgery knots , that violates the bennequin inequality in the new contact manifold . for doing this i want to present in this section a formula for computing the thurston - bennequin invariant of a legendrian knot in a surgered manifold . the main problem when doing this , is that the thurston - bennequin invariant is only defined for nullhomologous ( or rationally nullhomologous ) knots and a surgery in general destroys this property . but as long as the resulting manifold is a homology sphere ( or a rationally homology sphere ) every knot has to be nullhomologous ( or rationally nullhomologous ) . in this case formulas for computing the new thurston - bennequin invariants out of the old ones and out of the algebraic surgery dates are given in ( * ? ? ? * lemma 6.6 ) , ( * ? ? ? * lemma 2 ) and ( * ? ? ? * lemma 6.4 ) . here i first want to give an easy ( and easy to check ) condition ( out of the algebraic surgery data ) when such a knot is nullhomologous in the new manifold . if this is the case i secondly show how to compute out of this dates the new thurston - bennequin invariant . + let @xmath124 be an oriented link ( where the choice of orientation is not important ) . and let @xmath5 be the @xmath0-manifold obtained out of @xmath1 by dehn surgery along @xmath10 with topological surgery coefficients @xmath125 , for @xmath126 . denote by @xmath127 an oriented knot in @xmath1 and @xmath5 depending on the context . for simplicity write the linking numbers as @xmath128 , for @xmath129 . set also @xmath130 the matrix @xmath131 is a generalization of the linking matrix , because for @xmath132 the matrix @xmath131 is the linking matrix . the knot @xmath133 is called * nullhomologous * in @xmath5 if @xmath134=0\in h_1(m;\mathbb{z})$ ] . one can show ( see for example ( * ? ? ? * page 123 ) ) that this is equivalent to the existence of a seifert surface for the knot , so the surface longitude for a knot is defined if and only if the knot is nullhomologous . with the following lemma one can decide from the algebraic surgery data if such a knot is nullhomologous in the surgered manifold . [ nullhomologous knots ] + @xmath133 is nullhomologous in @xmath5 if and only if there exists an @xmath135 such that @xmath136 . + it is easy to compute the homology of @xmath5 ( see for example ( * ? ? ? * proposition 5.3.11 ) ) as @xmath137 where the generators of the @xmath138-factors are given by right - handed meridians @xmath139 corresponding to the components @xmath140 . next i express @xmath133 as a linear combination of the @xmath139 . one can show that the coefficients are the linking numbers @xmath141 , i.e. @xmath142=\sum_{i=1 } ^n l_{i0}\mu_i.\end{aligned}\ ] ] so @xmath133 is nullhomologous if and only if one can express @xmath134=\sum l_{i0}\mu_i$ ] as a linear combination of the relations , i.e. if there exists integers @xmath143 , @xmath126 , such that @xmath144 by comparing the coefficients and by writing the corresponding equations in vector form one sees that this is true if and only if there exists a vector @xmath135 such that @xmath136 . now assume @xmath133 is a legendrian link in @xmath145 . and let @xmath91 be a contact structure on @xmath5 that coincides with @xmath70 outside a tubular neighborhood of @xmath10 . for example if @xmath10 is also a legendrian link in @xmath2 and @xmath72 is the result of a contact dehn surgery along @xmath10 . but it is important to notice that the setting here is a more general one , one can also use contact surgery along transversal knots or surgery along a knot that is not adapted to the contact structure . here all surgery coefficients are understood to be topological surgery coefficients , i.e. with respect to the surface longitude @xmath87 which has linking number zero with the knot . ( so if one has a legendrian surgery diagram one first has to change the contact surgery coefficients to topological surgery coefficients , for example with the formula @xmath146 . ) [ computing the thurston - bennequin invariant ] + if @xmath133 is nullhomologous in @xmath5 , then one can compute the new thurston - bennequin number @xmath147 of @xmath133 in @xmath72 from the old one @xmath148 of @xmath133 in @xmath2 as @xmath149 where @xmath150 is a vector given by the formula from the previous lemma . + let @xmath87 be the surface longitude of @xmath133 in @xmath1 , i.e. @xmath151 . and let @xmath152 be the contact longitude of @xmath133 in @xmath2 . then @xmath148 is given by @xmath153 because the contact longitude is defined by the contact structure along @xmath133 and the contact structure does not change near @xmath133 by doing the surgery along @xmath10 the contact longitude @xmath152 represents also the contact longitude in @xmath72 . but in general the surface longitude @xmath87 changes . since the knot @xmath133 is nullhomologous in @xmath5 , there is a unique @xmath154 such that @xmath155 ( this is the new surface longitude ) . then @xmath147 is given by @xmath156 putting this together leads to @xmath157 so the only thing left is to compute @xmath6 . as in the proof of the previous lemma one computes the homology of @xmath158 as @xmath159 and expresses @xmath87 as @xmath160 so @xmath161 is zero in @xmath162 if and only if there exists integers @xmath163 , @xmath164 , such that @xmath165 by comparing the coefficients this is equivalent to the existence of a vector @xmath166 such that @xmath167 if one chooses for @xmath168 a solution @xmath150 from the first lemma the formula follows . [ computing @xmath110-numbers with this formulas ] + ( 1 ) consider the surgery diagram from figure [ fig : computing - tb - ex1 ] ( i ) . the old thurston - bennequin invariant of @xmath133 is @xmath169 . and because the surgery along the unknot @xmath3 with topological framing @xmath170 leads again to @xmath1 the knot @xmath133 is again nullhomologous in the new manifold . this can be checked also with the formula from above . for @xmath150 one gets the equation @xmath171 . and therefore @xmath172 . observe again that this result does not depend on the explicit contact structure chosen for the surgery . + ( 2 ) consider the surgery diagram from figure [ fig : computing - tb - ex1 ] ( ii ) . again the surgery leads to @xmath1 so the resulting knot is again nullhomologous . the new thurston - bennequin invariant can be computed as follows . for @xmath150 one gets the equation @xmath173 . and therefore @xmath174 . in the next section we will see that the contact surgery theorem is an easy corollary out of these two examples . + ( 3 ) there are also examples where the solution @xmath175 of @xmath176 is not unique . but the result of @xmath177 , of course , is not affected by this . for example consider the surgery diagram from figure [ fig : computing - tb - ex3 ] ( i ) . first one has to check if the knot @xmath133 is again nullhomologous in the surgered manifold . for this , one has to look if there exists a solution @xmath178 of @xmath179 two obvious solutions are @xmath180 so the new knot is nullhomologous and the new thurston - bennequin invariant can be computed out of the old one as follows @xmath181 observe that this result does not depend on the choice of @xmath150 . + [ subsection : computtingrationallytb ] this results can be easily generalized to rationally nullhomologous knots . a knot @xmath133 in @xmath5 is called * rationally nullhomologous * if there exists a natural number @xmath182 such that @xmath183=0\in h_1(m;\mathbb{z})$ ] . for rationally nullhomologous legendrian knots in contact @xmath0-manifolds one can generalize the thurston - bennequin invariant to the so called * rational thurston - bennequin invariant * @xmath184 ( see for example ( * ? ? ? * definition 6.2 ) or ( * ? ? ? * section 2 and 3 ) , for the fact that this is in general well defined see ( * ? ? ? * section 5 ) ) . with the same notation as from the first sections one gets the following generalizations of these results . [ computing the rationally thurston - bennequin invariant ] + ( 1 ) @xmath133 is rationally nullhomologous in @xmath5 if and only if there exists a natural number @xmath182 and a vector @xmath135 such that @xmath185 . + ( 2 ) if @xmath133 is rationally nullhomologous in @xmath5 then one can compute the new rationally thurston - bennequin number @xmath186 of @xmath133 in @xmath72 from the old one @xmath148 of @xmath133 in @xmath2 as follows @xmath187 + the proofs are similar to the ones in the foregoing subsections . for the first part one has to change the condition @xmath134=0 $ ] to @xmath183=0 $ ] and do the same computations again . the second part works similar . if @xmath133 is only rationally nullhomologous in @xmath5 , then the thurston - bennequin numbers are related as follows ( see also ( * ? ? ? * proof of lemma 2 ) ) . @xmath188 then same computations as in the first part lead to the result . [ computing @xmath110-numbers of rationally legendrian unknots in lens spaces ] this formula for computing the rational thurston - bennequin invariant is very useful to calculate @xmath184 in lens spaces . for example , consider the surgery diagram from figure [ fig : computing - tb - ex3 ] ( ii ) . the @xmath189-surgery along @xmath3 leads to the lens space @xmath190 . to check if the knot @xmath133 is nullhomologous one has to solve the equation @xmath191 . for @xmath192 this equation has no solution in @xmath138 and therefore @xmath133 is not nullhomologous in the surgered manifold . but ( for @xmath193 ) the equation @xmath194 has a solution , for example @xmath195 and @xmath196 . so @xmath133 is rationally nullhomologous in @xmath190 . the rationally thurston - bennequin invariant is computed as follows @xmath197 observe again that the result is independent of the chosen solution @xmath150 and independent of the chosen contact structure on the new glued - in solid torus . + one can also study the same problem for a surgery in a general contact manifold ( not on @xmath2 ) . this is motivated by ( * ? ? ? * lemma 6.4 ) . consider now @xmath198 an oriented nullhomologous link in some contact @xmath0-manifold @xmath199 . denote by @xmath72 some result of contact surgery along @xmath10 and by @xmath200 an oriented nullhomologous legendrian knot in @xmath199 and @xmath72 , depending on the context . then one gets exactly the same formulas as before . the only part changing in the proof is that the homologies are different , for example @xmath201 for more details see ( * ? ? ? * proof of lemma 6.4 ) . if one has a surgery diagram with also @xmath37-handles included , then one can use the above methods as well . the first possibility is to change all @xmath37-handles into @xmath202-surgeries along unknots and the second possibility is to think of the surgery diagram as a surgery diagram in @xmath203 ( represented by @xmath116 @xmath37-handles ) and then use the above extension . in further work @xcite there will also appear a formula like this for the rotation number , that generalizes the formulas from ( * ? ? ? * lemma 6.6 ) , ( * ? ? ? * lemma 2 ) and ( * ? ? ? * lemma 6.4 ) , together with a similar formula for the self - linking number of transversal knots . let @xmath18 be a legendrian knot in @xmath2 such that @xmath106 is again a contact @xmath1 ( with any contact structure ) for @xmath56 . from the ( topological ) surgery theorem [ thm : gordon - luecke2 ] it follows , that @xmath18 is topologically equivalent to an unknot @xmath13 . ( so i will write @xmath13 instead of @xmath18 . ) in the example from section [ section : surgery ] and the following remark i explained that the topological surgery coefficient ( with respect to the surface longitude @xmath39 ) has to be of the form @xmath170 , for @xmath204 . now i want to show that every resulting contact structure @xmath205 is overtwisted if @xmath13 is not coarse equivalent to an unknot of the form @xmath107 . to do this i will show that in the resulting contact @xmath0-spheres there exists legendrian knots that can not be realized in @xmath70 . for this , one considers the first two examples from subsection [ subsection : computtingtb ] . by doing a rolfsen twists along @xmath13 one sees that the legendrian knot @xmath133 from the first example remains an unknot in the new surgered manifold . for @xmath206 one gets @xmath207 ( independent of the choice of the contact structure on the new glued - in solid torus ) . according to the bennequin inequality this knot can not lie in a tight contact structure . so for @xmath206 it is not possible to have a non - trivial contact surgery from @xmath2 to itself . for @xmath208 one looks at the second example from subsection [ subsection : computtingtb ] . in figure [ fig : proofofcontactsurgerytheorem21 ] it is shown ( again by doing a rolfsen twist ) that @xmath133 becomes in the new surgered manifold a negative @xmath209-torus knot @xmath210 . in ( * section 1 ) it is shown that the maximal @xmath110-number of such a knot in @xmath2 is given by @xmath211 , which is smaller than @xmath212 . for @xmath13 not coarse equivalent to an legendrian unknot of the form @xmath107 this example can be realized as a contact surgery along a legendrian knot , which proves the result . the next natural question is if there exists ( like in the topological case ) legendrian links not determined by the contactomorphism type of their exteriors . if one wants to generalize the examples of whitehead one needs a contact analogon of a rolfsen twist . in the example from section [ section : contactsurgery ] i gave a contact surgery from @xmath2 to @xmath2 . topologically this surgery represents a @xmath103-dehn surgery along an unknot . deleting such components from contact surgery diagrams leads to a contact analogon of a @xmath105-rolfsen twist . but it is not clear how the rest of the diagram changes then . + figure [ fig : rolfsentwist ] shows two moves for contact dehn surgery diagrams . there , @xmath10 is an arbitrary legendrian link with surgery coefficients @xmath101 , that can go arbitrarily often through the unknot ( even one knot several times is allowed ) . + of course one can do such a contact rolfsen twist more than once , this corresponds to doing @xmath213-contact dehn surgeries along @xmath116 legendrian push - offs of the unknot . it is easy to see that this is the same as doing a single contact dehn surgery along the unknot with contact surgery coefficient @xmath214 . + first of all one observes that the first row in figure [ fig : rolfsentwist ] maps to the second row under the contactomorphism @xmath102 . so it is enough to prove the second row . for this , one observes that one can put the whole legendrian link @xmath10 together with the legendrian unknot @xmath13 on the pages of an abstract open book for @xmath2 ( see for example ( * ? ? ? * proof of theorem 5.5 ) ) . a part of this abstract open book is shown in figure [ fig : rolfsenopenbook ] . the page is pictured in gray and a part of the monodromy is described as a right handed dehn twist along the blue curve . one has to read the red curve in the open book , as necessarily many parallel copies . observe that the abstract open book determines the contact manifold only up to contactomorphism , as the surgery diagram does . next one constructs from this an abstract open book for the surgered manifold as explained in @xcite . first , one puts the legendrian link @xmath10 together with the legendrian unknots @xmath215 and @xmath216 from the @xmath217-surgery diagram on the page of an abstract open book for @xmath2 . this is shown in figure [ fig : rolfsenproofneu ] on the upper right side . the additional stabilization of the legendrian unknot @xmath216 corresponds to a stabilization of the open book as shown in ( * ? ? ? * figure 1 and 2 ) . the monodromy of the open book for @xmath2 is given by right handed dehn twists along the blue curves . the monodromy of the surgered manifold is obtained by composing this old monodromoy with right handed dehn twists along the @xmath105-surgery knot and left handed dehn twists along the @xmath103-surgery knot ( see ( * ? ? ? * proposition 8) ) . two dehn twists cancel each other and one gets the open book in the bottom right corner of figure [ fig : rolfsenproofneu ] . that open book represents the surgery diagram of the once stabilized legendrian link @xmath10 shown in the bottom left corner of figure [ fig : rolfsenproofneu ] . observe also that the topological surgery coefficients of @xmath10 change exactly as prescribed by the topological rolfsen twists . [ counterexamples to the legendrian link complement problem ] + with this contact rolfsen twist one can give counterexamples to the legendrian link complement problem . but it is not as easy as in the topological setting . the main point there was that the new glued - in solid tori is again a tubular neighborhood of the spine of this torus . this is not the case in the contact setting . to see this , consider a legendrian knot @xmath18 in a contact @xmath0-manifold @xmath72 and the result of contact surgery along this knot @xmath95 . then the slope of the new glued - in solid torus is @xmath19 . but if this new glued - in solid torus would be the standard neighborhood of a legendrian knot then the slope would be of the form @xmath218 . so for general @xmath19 this is not the case . therefore , one looks at the contact surgery diagram with one @xmath103-surgery along @xmath215 and one @xmath105-surgery along @xmath216 . the new glued - in solid tori are again in a canonical way standard neighborhoods of the legendrian spines @xmath219 and @xmath220 . from the proof of the lemma it follows that this spines @xmath219 and @xmath220 lie in the resulting surgery diagram as shown in figure [ fig : rolfsentwistmitseele ] . + ( 1 ) consider the two legendrian links @xmath221 and @xmath222 in @xmath2 as depicted in figure [ fig : counterexample1 ] . these two links are not equivalent because their triples of @xmath110-numbers are different : @xmath223 ; @xmath224 . but their exteriors are contactomorphic , as one can see as follows . one does a @xmath103-surgery along @xmath215 and a @xmath105-surgery along @xmath216 . the resulting manifold is again @xmath2 , in which the legendrian knot @xmath10 looks now like @xmath225 in figure [ fig : counterexample1 ] on the right . so in the exteriors of @xmath226 and @xmath227 the legendrian knots @xmath10 and @xmath225 are the same . + ( 2 ) one can also get examples with different topological types and the same @xmath110-numbers . for that consider the legendrian links in figure [ fig : counterexample2 ] similar to the whitehead links as in the example from section [ section : complement ] . in the left legendrian link in figure [ fig : counterexample2 ] all three knots are unknots , but in the right link the knot @xmath225 is non - trivial , so they can not be equivalent . but their exteriors are contactomorphic with the same argument as in the foregoing example . + ( 3 ) by doing contact dehn surgeries corresponding to an @xmath116-fold rolfsen twist , for @xmath208 , one gets in both foregoing examples infinitely many different legendrian links with contactomorphic exteriors . instead of looking at legendrian knots in @xmath2 one can also look at legendrian knots in general contact @xmath0-manifolds and study the legendrian knot exterior problem for these knots . before studying the contact case in the next section , i first recall some basic facts about this problem in the topological setting . of course , one can transfer this problem in an arbitrary manifold to a problem concerning dehn surgery like before in the proof of theorem [ thm : gordon - luecke1 ] . + let @xmath18 be a knot in a @xmath0-manifold @xmath5 , such that there is no non - trivial dehn surgery along @xmath18 resulting again in @xmath5 . then the equivalence type of @xmath18 is determined by the diffeomorphism type of its complement . but to proof the hypothesis of this lemma turns out to be very difficult and in general , both , the conclusion and the hypothesis of the lemma are not true . to see this , consider the following counterexample ( see also @xcite ) . [ two non - equivalent knots with the same complements ] + consider two different dehn surgeries along the unknot @xmath13 in @xmath1 with the ( topological ) surgery coefficients @xmath228 and @xmath229 , leading to the lens spaces @xmath230 and @xmath231 . by the classification of lens spaces ( * ? ? ? * exercise 5.3.8 . ( b ) ) this two lens spaces are orientation preserving homeomorphic and the homeomorphism is given by interchanging the two solid tori ( see also ( * ? ? ? * section 2 ) ) . from this dehn surgery example it is easy to find two non - equivalent knots with the same exteriors . for this write + + ( 0,5)*+l(5,2)=``a'';(10,5)*+=``a1 '' ; ( 24,5)*+s^3_u ( r_i)=``b '' ; ( 39,5)*+:==``b1 '' ; ( 52,5)*+s^1d^2=``c '' ; ( 70,5)*++=``d '' ; ( 90,5)*+s^3=``e'';(104,5)*+/_~=``e1'';(52,0)*+_0=``f '' ; ( 89,0)*+r_i=``g'';@|- > `` f'';``g '' ; + + and consider the knots @xmath232 the knots @xmath16 and @xmath17 given as the spines of the new glued - in solid tori represents the spines of the genus-1 heegaard splitting of @xmath230 . as tubular neighborhood of @xmath66 one chooses the whole new glued - in solid tori @xmath36 , therefore the exterior is in both cases @xmath233 . it remains to show that these two knots are not equivalent . therefore , assume that there is an orientation preserving homeomorphism @xmath234 by restricting @xmath6 to the complementary solid tori @xmath235 one gets a homeomorphism @xmath236 which sends the slope @xmath237 to the slope @xmath238 . but such a map can not exists because all orientation preserving homeomorphisms of solid tori are isotopic to dehn twists along meridians . so @xmath16 is not orientation preserving equivalent to @xmath17 in @xmath230 . with the same methods as above it is easy to show ( see @xcite ) that if @xmath16 and @xmath17 are the cores of the two solid tori in the standard heegaard splitting of @xmath190 , then they have homeomorphic complements , but there is an orientation preserving ( reversing ) homeomorphism of @xmath190 sending @xmath16 to @xmath17 if and only if @xmath239 ( @xmath240 ) . the key point in the foregoing examples is that there is a so called * exotic cosmetic surgery * , that means two surgeries along the same knot resulting in the same manifold but with different slopes , such that there is no homeomorphism of the knot exterior mapping one slope to the other ( see @xcite ) . one can show that every knot in a given @xmath0-manifold is determined by its complement if and only if this manifold can not be obtained by exotic cosmetic surgery from another manifold . [ thm : cosmetic ] + the following two claims are equivalent . 1 . let @xmath16 and @xmath17 be knots in a closed @xmath0-manifold @xmath5 with homeomorphic complements . then @xmath16 is equivalent to @xmath17 . 2 . let @xmath241 be a knot in a closed @xmath0-manifold @xmath242 , such that @xmath243 and @xmath244 are both homeomorphic to @xmath5 ( for @xmath245 ) . then there exists a homeomorphism of the knot exterior @xmath246 mapping one slope to the other . + ( 1 ) the statement holds in the oriented and unoriented case . + ( 2 ) one can take the manifold @xmath242 to be homeomorphic to @xmath5 , this explains the name cosmetic surgery . [ proof of theorem [ thm : cosmetic ] ] + the proof of @xmath247 works exactly as in the foregoing example . the implication @xmath248 is similar to the proof of theorem [ thm : gordon - luecke1 ] . so the study of the knot complement problem is equivalent to the study of exotic cosmetic surgeries . in the topological setting some is known , but much remains open . beside the discussed knot complement theorem for knots in @xmath1 , gabai showed in @xcite that knots in @xmath104 ( or more generally in a connected sum of arbitrary @xmath249- or @xmath250-bundles over @xmath75 ) are determined by their complements . but in general manifolds this will not hold . building up on work by mathieu @xcite , rong classified in @xcite all knots in @xmath0-manifolds with seifert fibered complements , that are not determined by their complements . this knots are given by the spines of the solid tori in the standard heegaard splitting of some special lens spaces @xmath190 as described at the beginning of this section or as exceptional fibers of index @xmath71 in special seifert fibered manifolds . but all this homeomorphisms sending one of the exceptional fibers to another one have to be orientation reversing . later matignon @xcite proved that all non - hyperbolic knots in atoroidal irreducible seifert fibered @xmath0-manifolds are determined by their complements ( except the cores of the standard heegaard splittings in lens spaces ) . for hyperbolic knots there is until now only one counterexample . in @xcite bleiler , hodgson and weeks construct two non - equivalent hyperbolic knots in @xmath251 with orientation reversing homeomorphic complements . they also give very good reasons for the conjecture that all knots in hyperbolic @xmath0-manifolds are determined by their oriented complements . recently ichihara and jong @xcite found examples of knots in hyperbolic manifolds with orientation reversing homeomorpic complements . all together this leads to the still open oriented knot complement conjecture in general manifolds : + if @xmath16 and @xmath17 are knots in a closed oriented @xmath0-manifold @xmath5 with orientation preserving homeomorphic complements ( not homeomorphic to @xmath36 ) , then the knots are orientation preserving equivalent . with theorem [ thm : cosmetic ] and the following remark this is equivalent to the cosmetic surgery conjecture formulated in @xcite : + exotic cosmetic surgeries ( not resulting in a lens space ) are never orientation preserving ( or * truly * ) cosmetic . many of the mentioned results rely on the classification of all dehn surgeries in a solid torus resulting again in a solid torus by berge @xcite and gabai @xcite . but in the last years also heegaard floer homology turned out to be a very useful tool to study such questions . for example , wang @xcite showed that there are no exotic dehn surgeries along seifert genus-@xmath37 knots in @xmath1 . the same holds for non - trivial algebraic knots in @xmath1 by @xcite . finally , in @xcite and @xcite it is shown that knots in @xmath10-space homology spheres are determined by their complements . in particular , knots in the poincar sphere are determined up to orientation preserving equivalence by the oriented homeomorphism types of their complements . as far as i know , nothing is known about this in the contact setting . the question is which results from the topological setting generalize to the contact setting and where are the differences . in the foregoing section i presented examples of non - equivalent knots in lens spaces with homeomorphic exteriors . the first interesting question is if one can generalize this examples to the contact setting . [ non - equivalent legendrian knots with the same complements ] + consider a legendrian knot @xmath18 with @xmath252 . a standard neighborhood of @xmath18 is given by @xmath253 the surface longitude is given by @xmath254 and the contact longitude by @xmath218 . take two copies @xmath255 and @xmath256 of this standard neighborhood and glue them together along their boundaries to obtain the lens space @xmath190 as follows : + + ( 20,10)*+l(p , q)=``a'';(30,10)*+==``a1 '' ; ( 40,10)*+v_1=``c '' ; ( 60,10)*++=``d '' ; ( 80,10)*+v_2=``e'';(95,10)*+/_~=``e1'';(40,5)*+_1=``f '' ; ( 80,5)*+-q_2+p_2,=``g'';(40,0)*+_1=``h '' ; ( 80,0)*+r_2+s_2,=``i'';@|- > `` f'';``g '' ; @|- > `` h'';``i '' ; + + where @xmath257 . it is a standard fact that the contact structures on the solid tori fit together to a contact structure in the new lens space @xmath190 if the gluing map sends the contact longitude of @xmath258 to the contact longitude of @xmath259 . this leads to the conditions @xmath260 and @xmath261 . putting this together it follows that @xmath262 . in particular , it follows that if a contact lens space is obtained by gluing together two standard neighborhoods of legendrian knots , then the lens space is of the form @xmath263 . but in this case the spines @xmath16 and @xmath17 of the heegaard tori are topologically equivalent , as was explained in the foregoing section . ( 20,10)*+l(p , p-1)=``a'';(32,10)*+==``a1 '' ; ( 40,10)*+v_1=``c '' ; ( 60,10)*++=``d '' ; ( 80,10)*+v_2=``e'';(95,10)*+/_~=``e1'';(40,5)*+_1=``f '' ; ( 80,5)*+(1+pn)_2+p_2,=``g'';(40,0)*+_1=``h '' ; ( 80,0)*+-pn^2_2+(1-pn)_2.=``i'';@|- > `` f'';``g '' ; @|- > `` h'';``i '' ; + + this gluing map sends the contact longitude of @xmath258 to the contact longitude of @xmath259 and leads therefore to a contact structure on the lens space . the legendrian knots @xmath16 and @xmath17 represent the spines of the heegaard tori in this lens space . therefore they both have order @xmath264 in @xmath265 . the extended seifert longitude @xmath63 of @xmath17 is given by @xmath266 ( it is nullhomologous in the exterior of @xmath17 and @xmath267 . ) so one computes @xmath268 to compute @xmath269 one first computes the inverse gluing map as : + + ( 20,10)*+l(p , p-1)=``a'';(32,10)*+==``a1 '' ; ( 40,10)*+v_2=``c '' ; ( 60,10)*++=``d '' ; ( 80,10)*+v_1=``e'';(95,10)*+/_~=``e1'';(40,5)*+_2=``f '' ; ( 80,5)*+(1-pn)_1-p_1,=``g'';(40,0)*+_2=``h '' ; ( 80,0)*+pn^2_1+(1+pn)_1.=``i'';@|- > `` f'';``g '' ; @|- > `` h'';``i '' ; + + then one sees that the extended seifert longitude of @xmath16 is given by @xmath270 and so @xmath271 so the rational thurston - bennequin invariants are different , therefore @xmath16 and @xmath17 are not legendrian isotopic and then also not coarse equivalent . so in contrast to the topological case one gets obvious counterexamples to the legendrian knot exterior conjectures exactly in the lens spaces @xmath263 . it would be interesting if one can generalize the examples from this section to a general classification result in lens spaces . a first step to study the legendrian knot exterior problem in general contact manifolds would be a generalization of theorem [ thm : cosmetic ] . the generalization of the implication @xmath248 one can prove similarly to the proof of theorem [ thm : contact1 ] . + let @xmath18 be a legendrian knot in a contact manifold @xmath72 , such that there is no non - trivial contact dehn surgery along @xmath18 resulting again in @xmath72 . then the equivalence type of @xmath18 is determined by the contactomorphism type of its exterior . but the other implication does not generalize . the problem is again that the new glued - in solid torus is in general not a standard neighborhood of a legendrian knot as explained in section [ counterexample ] . so it is not directly clear if exotic cosmetic contact surgeries leads to counterexamples to the legendrian knot exterior problem . but their existence is interesting in its own . the following example was obtained earlier by geiges and onaran ( see also @xcite ) . [ exotic contact surgeries ] + consider the two different contact dehn surgeries along the legendrian unknot @xmath13 with @xmath96 in @xmath2 with respect to the contact surgery coefficients @xmath272 and @xmath273 ( see figure [ fig : lensspace ] ) . by expressing the surgery coefficients with respect to the surface longitude @xmath39 given by the meridian of the complementary solid torus one sees that the resulting manifolds are topologically the manifolds from the example from the foregoing section , so the homeomorphic lens spaces @xmath230 and @xmath231 . the next thing i want to show is that the two contact surgeries are unique and represent the same contact manifold . therefore one uses the same approach as in the example in section [ section : contactsurgery ] . the same argument as in that example shows that the two surgery diagrams both represent a unique contact structure @xmath91 on @xmath230 . the from the algorithm ( * ? ? ? * section 1 ) resulting @xmath217-contact surgery diagrams are shown in figure [ fig : lensspace ] in the middle ( for both contact surgeries is only one of the two possible stabilizations drawn ) . both surgery diagrams contain only @xmath105-contact surgeries , so the resulting contact structures have to be tight . but the classification of tight contact structures on lens spaces ( * ? ? ? * theorem 2.1 ) says that on @xmath230 there are two non - contactomorphic tight contact structures , so in this case this is not enough to conclude that these surgery diagrams represent the same contact manifold . to show that the contact structures of the two different surgeries are really contactomorphic one changes the contact dehn surgery diagrams into compatible open book decompositions ( for details see for example @xcite ) . the resulting open books are shown in figure [ fig : lensspace ] on the right . all colored curves represent right - handed dehn twists , the blue ones correspond to the monodromy of the open book decomposition of @xmath2 and the red and orange curves represent the dehn twists corresponding to the same colored legendrian links . all dehn twists together represent the monodromy of @xmath274 . by interchanging the holes , these two open books are the same , and therefore represent the same contact manifolds . these cosmetic contact surgeries are exotic because the corresponding topological cosmetic surgeries are exotic ( i.e. there is no homeomorphism of the exterior of the unknot that maps one slope to the other ) . with exactly the same methods one can get many other examples of this kind . for example , by contact dehn surgery along @xmath13 with contact surgery coefficients @xmath275 and @xmath276 one gets contactomorphic contact structures on the lens spaces @xmath277 and @xmath278 . an easy consequence of the contact dehn surgery theorem [ thm : contact2 ] is that the only possible candidates for legendrian knots in @xmath2 admitting a ( non - trivial ) contact surgery resulting again in @xmath2 are the legendrian unknots of type @xmath107 . that cosmetic contact surgeries along such knots really exists was shown in the example in section [ section : contactsurgery ] . it is also possible to show that every legendrian unknot of type @xmath107 admits ( infinitely many ) cosmetic contact surgeries resulting again in @xmath2 . by computing explicitly the @xmath279-invariants ( see @xcite ) of all other contact surgeries one can show that these are the only cosmetic contact surgeries from @xmath2 to @xmath2 . moreover , in section [ counterexample ] i showed that all topological examples of links not determined by their complements , where one does a composition of @xmath105-rolfsen twist along unknot components , works also for the contact case . but in the topological category there are also examples that do not arise in this way . teragaito @xcite and ichihara @xcite construct , building up on unpublished work of berge , links in @xmath1 with no unknot components , such that non - trivial dehn surgery along that link leads again to @xmath1 . similar to the arguments in theorem [ thm : cosmetic ] this leads to links not determined by their complements . gordon proves in @xcite that for every such link ( not determined by its complement , but without unknot components ) there exists only finitely many other links with homeomorphic complements . finally in @xcite the reverse question is considered . they study links that * are * determined by their complements . i would like to thank sebastian durst , hansjrg geiges , mirko klukas and sinem onaran for reading earlier versions of this article and for many useful discussions and suggestions . part of this work was supported by the dfg graduiertenkolleg 1269 `` global structures in geometry and analysis '' . r. avdek , contact surgery and supporting open books , _ algebr . _ * 13 * ( 2013 ) , 1613 - 1660 . k. baker and j. grigsby , grid diagrams and legendrian lens space links , _ j. symplectic geom . _ * 7 * ( 2009 ) , 415 - 448 . j. berge , the knots in @xmath280 which have nontrivial dehn surgeries that yield @xmath280 , _ topology appl . _ * 38 * ( 1991 ) , 1 - 19 . s. bleiler , c. hodgson and j. weeks , cosmetic surgery on knots , in _ proceedings of the kirbyfest _ , 23 - 34 , geometry and topology monographs * 2 * , coventry ( 1999 ) . j. conway , transverse surgery on knots in contact 3-manifolds , preprint available on : + http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7077 f. ding and h. geiges , symplectic fillability of tight contact structures on torus bundles , _ algebr . _ * 1 * ( 2001 ) , 153 - 172 . f. ding and h. geiges , a legendrian surgery presentation of contact @xmath0-manifolds , _ math . cambridge philos . * 136 * ( 2004 ) , 583 - 598 . f. ding and h. geiges , the diffeotopy group of @xmath104 via contact topology , _ compos . _ * 146 * ( 2010 ) , 1096 - 1112 . f. ding , h. geiges and a. i. stipsicz , surgery diagrams for contact @xmath0-manifolds , _ turkish j. math . _ * 28 * ( 2004 ) , 41 - 74 . s. durst and m. kegel , computing rotation and self - linking numbers , preprint s. durst , m. kegel and m. klukas , computing the thurston - bennequin invariant in open books , preprint j. edwards , concentricity in @xmath0-manifolds , _ trans . * 113 * ( 1964 ) , 406 - 423 . y. eliashberg and m. fraser , topologically trivial legendrian knots , _ j. symplectic geom . _ * 7 * ( 2009 ) , 77 - 127 . j. etnyre , convex surfaces in contact geometry : class notes , lecture notes available on : http://people.math.gatech.edu/~etnyre/preprints/papers/surfaces.pdf j. etnyre and k. honda , knots and contact geometry i : torus knots and the figure eight knot , _ j. symplectic geom . _ * 1 * ( 2001 ) , 63 - 120 . j. etnyre , legendrian and transversal knots , in : _ handbook of knot theory _ ( w. menasco and m. thistlethwaite , eds . ) , elsevier , amsterdam ( 2005 ) , 105 - 185 d. gabai , foliations and the topology of @xmath0-manifolds ii , _ j. differential geom . _ * 26 * ( 1987 ) , 461 - 478 . d. gabai , surgery on knots in solid tori , _ topology _ * 28 * ( 1989 ) , 1 - 6 . f. gainullin , heegaard floer homology and knots determined by their complements , preprint available on : http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.06180 h. geiges , _ an introduction to contact topology _ , cambridge stud . adv . math . * 109 * ( cambridge university press , 2008 ) . h. geiges and s. onaran , legendrian rational unknots in lens spaces , _ j. symplectic geom . _ * 13 * ( 2015 ) , 17 - 50 . r. e. gompf and a. i. stipsicz , _ @xmath281-manifolds and kirby calculus _ , * 20 * ( american mathematical society , providence , ri , 1999 ) . c. gordon , links and their complements , in : `` topology and geometry : commemorating sistag '' , 71 - 82 , contemp . math . * 314 * ( american mathematical society , 2002 ) . c. gordon and j. luecke , knots are determined by their complements , _ * 2 * ( 1989 ) , 371 - 415 . k. honda , on the classification of tight contact structures i , _ geom . * 4 * ( 2000 ) , 309 - 368 . k. ichihara , on tunnel number one links with surgeries yielding the @xmath0-sphere , _ osaka j. math . _ * 47 * , number 1 ( 2010 ) , 189 - 208 . k. ichihara and i. jong , cosmetic banding on knots and links , preprint available on : + http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01542 m. kegel , kontakt - dehn - chirurgie entlang legendre - knoten , bachelorarbeit , universitt zu kln ( 2011 ) , available online : http://www.mi.uni-koeln.de/~mkegel/downloads.html p. lisca , p. ozsvth , a. i. stipsicz and z. szab , heegaard floer invariants of legendrian knots in contact three - manifolds , _ j. eur . math . soc . _ ( jems ) * 11 * ( 2009 ) , 1307 - 1363 . y. mathieu , closed @xmath0-manifolds unchanged by dehn surgery , _ j. knot theory ramifications _ * 1 * ( 1992 ) , 279 - 296 . d. matignon , on the knot complement problem for non - hyperbolic knots , _ topology appl . _ * 157 * ( 2010 ) , 1900 - 1925 . h. matsuda , m. ozawa and k. shimokawa on non - simple reflexive links , _ j. knot theory ramifications _ * 11 * ( 2002 ) , 787 - 791 . b. zbaci an open book decomposition compatible with rational contact surgery , _ proceedings of gkova geometry - topology conference _ ( 2005 ) , 175 - 186 . v. v. prasolov and a. b. sossinsky , _ knots , links , braids and @xmath0-manifolds _ , transl . * 154 * ( american mathematical society , providence , 1997 ) . h. ravelomanana , exceptional cosmetic surgeries on @xmath1 , preprint available on : + http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.00238 h. ravelomanana , knot complement problem for @xmath10-space @xmath282 , preprint available on : http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.00239 d. rolfsen , _ knots and links _ , mathematics lecture series * 7 * ( publish or perish , berkeley , 1976 ) . y. rong , some knots not determined by their complements , in : `` quantum topology '' , ser . knots everything * 3 * , ( world sci . publishing , river edge , nj , 1993 ) , 339 - 353 . m. teragaito , links with surgery yielding the @xmath0-sphere , _ j. knot theory ramifications _ * 11 * ( 2002 ) , 105 - 108 . h. tietze , ber die topologischen invarianten mehrdimensionaler mannigfaltigkeiten , _ monatshefte fr mathematik und physik _ * 19 * ( 1908 ) , 1 - 118 . j. wang , cosmetic surgeries on genus one knots , _ algebr . _ * 6 * ( 2006 ) , 1491 - 1517 . j. h. c. whitehead , on doubled knots , _ j. london math . * 12 * ( 1937 ) , 63 - 71 . Abstract:
[ "we prove that every legendrian knot in the tight contact structure of the @xmath0-sphere is determined by the contactomorphism type of its exterior . moreover , by giving counterexamples we show this to be not true for legendrian links in the tight @xmath0-sphere and for legendrian knots in arbitrary contact manifolds . on the way a new user - friendly formula for computing the thurston - bennequin invariant of a legendrian knot in a surgery diagram is given ." ]
12,112
12,112
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: neutron star cooling is an important tool for the study of dense matter . by comparing cooling models with observations of thermal emission from these objects , we can gain insight into the equation of state ( eos ) of dense matter , the signatures of exotic particles , superfluid energy gaps , and magnetic field properties [ for a recent review , see @xcite ] . a neutron star loses the thermal energy with which it was born initially through neutrino emission , and later through photon emission , the change between these two stages occurring about @xmath0 yr after birth . several heating mechanisms may become important during late stages of the evolution of a neutron star , most of them related to the delayed adjustment to the progressively changing equilibrium state as the rotation slows down . these include the dissipation of rotational energy due to interactions between superfluid and normal components of the star @xcite and release of strain energy stored by the solid crust due to spin - down deformation @xcite . another of these mechanisms is _ rotochemical heating _ @xcite , which has its origin in deviations from beta equilibrium due to spin - down compression . as a neutron star spins down , the centrifugal force acting on each fluid element diminishes , changing the local value of the pressure . since the composition of neutron star matter in beta equilibrium is a one - parameter function , this compression results in a displacement of the equilibrium concentration of each particle species . reactions which change the chemical composition are in charge of driving the system to the new equilibrium configuration . but if the rate at which reactions do this task is slower than the change of the equilibrium concentrations due to spin - down compression , the system is permanently out of chemical equilibrium . this implies an excess of energy , which is dissipated by enhanced neutrino emission and heat generation . after its introduction , this heating mechanism was studied by several authors : @xcite applied it to quark stars , @xcite made an order - of - magnitude estimate of the effects of superfluidity , and @xcite studied the heating due to compositional transitions in the crust due to spin - down compression . all studies agree that rotochemical heating is particularly important for old neutron stars with fast rotation and low magnetic fields , features that are characteristic of millisecond pulsars ( msps ) . the most striking prediction associated with rotochemical heating is that , if the spin - down timescale is substantially longer than any other timescale involved ( with the likely exception of magnetic field decay ) , the star arrives at a _ quasi - equilibrium state _ , in which the temperature depends only on the current , slowly changing value of @xmath1 ( the product of the angular velocity and its time derivative ) , proportional to the spin - down power , and not on the star s previous history @xcite . this provides a simple way to constrain the physics involved in theoretical models , once the spin parameters and observed surface temperature of a msp are known . although the qualitative behavior of the thermal evolution of neutron stars with rotochemical heating is known , all previous studies made only order - of - magnitude estimates , ignoring the spatial structure of the star and thus not offering reliable predictions to be compared with observations . also unknown is the dependence of the thermal evolution on eos and stellar mass . in this work , we calculate the thermal evolution of msps with rotochemical heating , taking the structure of the star fully into account in the frame of general relativity , and using realistic eoss of dense matter . in order to do so , we develop a general formalism to treat the evolution of the temperature and departures of chemical equilibrium . as a first approach , we have chosen the simplest possible core composition , namely neutrons , protons , electrons , and muons ( @xmath2 matter ) , to see if we can explain observations with it , before invoking exotic particles . the main difficulty of treating the spatial structure of the star is the lack of an expression for the spin - down compression in the frame of general relativity . we develop such an expression with the aid of the slow - rotation approximation of @xcite . the astrophysical situation to be modelled is the stage after the accretion - driven spin - up of the pulsar has finished . although it is generally believed that crusts and cores of neutron stars have superfluid components ( e.g. , @xcite ) , in this work we ignore superfluidity . our plan is to make an extensive study of rotochemical heating in non - superfluid stars and compare results with observations , in order to assess whether invoking superfluidity ( whose parameters are currently very uncertain ) is necessary to explain observations . the structure of this paper is the following : in 2 , we develop our general formalism , as well as the expression for the spin - down compression rate . in 3 , we detail the input necessary for numerical calculations ( eos , reactions , heat capacities , etc . ) . in 4 , we describe our results , comparing our predictions with the recent detection of likely thermal ultraviolet emission from the nearest msp , psr j0437 - 4715 @xcite , and the lack of optical emission from the even closer `` classical '' pulsar psr j0108 - 1413 @xcite . we also list some other msps for which the rotochemical heating luminosity might become detectable . a short summary of our main conclusions is given in 5 . it is conventional in neutron star cooling calculations to divide the star into two regions : a nearly isothermal _ interior _ , which ranges from the center out to density @xmath3 g @xmath4 , and a thin _ envelope _ , which ranges from @xmath5 to the surface and where a strong temperature gradient exists @xcite . since we are modelling the thermal evolution of a msp long after accretion has stopped , it is safe to assume that thermal relaxation from an initial non - uniform internal temperature profile has already occurred , so that the redshifted internal temperature , @xmath6 is uniform ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . here , @xmath7 is the time component of the metric of a non - rotating reference star , of which @xmath8 is the radial spherical coordinate . although spherical symmetry is broken for a rotating star , we describe the latter as a perturbation to the corresponding non - rotating star ( with the same total baryon number ) . we establish a lagrangian correspondence between the surfaces of constant @xmath8 in the non - rotating star with the constant - pressure surfaces of its rotating counterpart , on which all local thermodynamic quantities will be shown to be constant ( see [ sec : perturbation ] ) . the evolution of the internal temperature is given by the thermal balance equation @xcite , which for an isothermal interior is given by @xmath9,\ ] ] where @xmath10 is the total heat capacity of the star , @xmath11 is the total power released by heating mechanisms , @xmath12 is the total neutrino luminosity , and @xmath13 is the photon luminosity . these quantities are calculated as @xmath14 respectively , where @xmath15 is the proper volume element , @xmath16 is the specific heat ( heat capacity per unit volume ) of each particle species , @xmath17 is the total neutrino emissivity contributed by reactions , @xmath18 is the total heating rate per unit volume , @xmath19 is the stefan - boltzmann constant , @xmath20 is the stellar coordinate radius , @xmath21 , @xmath22 is the effective radius as measured from infinity , and @xmath23 the redshifted effective temperature . the surface temperature @xmath24 is obtained from the internal temperature by assuming an envelope model @xcite . since the neutrino emissivity and heating rate are modified when the neutron star is out of chemical equilibrium @xcite , the evolution of the temperature depends on how strongly it departs from the beta equilibrium state . for @xmath2 matter , this departure can be quantified by the chemical imbalances @xcite : @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the deviation from the equilibrium chemical potential of species @xmath27 , at a given pressure . since diffusion timescales are short compared with the evolutionary timescales to be considered @xcite , we assume uniform redshifted chemical potential deviations throughout the core : @xmath28 to obtain the time evolution of the chemical imbalances , we start by writing down the chemical potential of each particle species as a function of the number density of all particles : @xmath29 . we assume small departures from chemical equilibrium , which can be expressed by requiring that @xmath30 . in this approximation , the departures from the equilibrium particle number densities @xmath31 are related to the @xmath32 by @xmath33 where the partial derivatives are evaluated at the beta equilibrium state . to eliminate the effect of particle diffusion between different regions of the star , we integrate equation ( [ eq : dni_dmui ] ) over regions where free particles exist . after integration , we obtain the deviation from the equilibrium number of particles @xmath34 as a function of the redshifted chemical potential lags : @xmath35 with @xmath36 where we have used equation ( [ eq : delta_mu_infty ] ) . since the @xmath37 do not depend on time , we invert and take the time derivative of equation ( [ eq : dni_dmui ] ) , obtaining the evolution of the @xmath38 : @xmath39 the rate of change of @xmath34 is given by @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the change in the total number of particles of species @xmath27 due to reactions @xcite . here , @xmath42 is the net creation rate of particles of species @xmath27 per unit volume due to reaction @xmath43 . it can be checked that the @xmath44 satisfy baryon number and charge conservation . the quantity @xmath45 is the change in the equilibrium value of the total number of particles of species @xmath27 , which depends on the spin - down compression rate . we defer its calculation to the next subsection . the evolution of the redshifted chemical imbalances @xmath46 follows from equations ( [ eq : eta1 ] ) , ( [ eq : eta2 ] ) , and ( [ eq : delta_mu_infty ] ) : @xmath47 equations ( [ eq : dot_t ] ) , ( [ eq : dot_eta1 ] ) , and ( [ eq : dot_eta2 ] ) give a complete description of the thermal evolution of a neutron star with rotochemical heating and @xmath2 composition , given an expression for @xmath45 . for slow enough rotation frequencies , the deviation of the star from the non - rotating configuration can be treated as a small perturbation , which we describe in terms of a lagrangian formalism . using the fact that the total baryon number @xmath48 of a star is conserved , we can describe its interior in terms of surfaces of constant pressure @xmath49 enclosing a fixed number of baryons @xmath50 ( e.g. , the surface @xmath51 encloses @xmath48 baryons inside it ) . as the stellar rotation rate changes , these surfaces will readjust their shapes , with a corresponding change in @xmath49 , but keeping @xmath50 constant . since there is a one - to - one relation between the enclosed number of baryons @xmath50 and the radial coordinate of the non - rotating configuration @xmath8 ( for fixed @xmath48 ) , we use them interchangeably to identify a given surface , relating them by @xmath52 . the underlying assumption is that , on a surface of constant pressure , the other thermodynamical quantities are also constant . this is straightforward for neutron - star matter in beta equilibrium ( described by a barotropic equation of state ) , but not so obvious for departures from this state ( which are not necessarily barotropic , as the pressure - density relation will also depend on the local particle abundances ) . we show in appendix [ sec : gradients ] that , in a uniformly rotating , perfect - fluid star in hydrostatic equilibrium , surfaces of constant pressure coincide with those of constant energy density and gravitational redshift , regardless of whether the equation of state is barotropic .. ] this , together with diffusive equilibrium ( uniform redshifted chemical potentials everywhere in the stellar interior ) , ensures that the chemical composition on each surface is also constant . to quantify the spin - down compression rate and thus @xmath53 , we need an expression for the change in pressure with rotation frequency on each surface enclosing a constant @xmath50 , keeping @xmath48 constant . @xcite developed a perturbative approach in the frame of general relativity , relating quantities on rotating and non - rotating stars with the same central energy density @xmath54 ( but , therefore , different @xmath48 ) , by expanding the metric of an axially symmetric non - rotating star in even powers of the angular velocity @xmath55 . this perturbative approach is valid for stars rotating at frequencies much smaller than the kepler frequency @xmath56 , at which mass shedding from the equator occurs . for realistic equations of state , this limiting frequency can be well approximated by means of empirical formulae @xcite . the corresponding kepler periods , @xmath57 , are lower than the shortest msp periods measured to date [ see , e.g. , the atnf pulsar catalogue @xcite ] . our task is to express our spin - down compression rate at constant @xmath48 in terms of hartle s results , which assume constant @xmath54 . if the baryon number enclosed by a surface of constant pressure @xmath49 in a rotating star is @xmath58 , some partial - derivative manipulation yields @xmath59 where the subscripts denote quantities which are kept constant in carrying out the differentiation . we note that @xmath60 and @xmath61 are just @xmath62 and @xmath63 , respectively , evaluated at the surface of the star ( @xmath51 ) . also , since we are perturbing around the non - rotating configuration , we can evaluate all the derivatives at @xmath64 . @xcite found that the lowest - order change in a given stellar property with rotation is linear in the squared angular frequency @xmath65 , for a star with fixed central density . we can thus write @xmath66 and consider it independent of @xmath65 . to find the number of baryons enclosed by a surface of constant pressure , we recall the baryon number conservation law @xcite , and write @xmath67 where @xmath68 is the determinant of the metric , @xmath69 is the time component of the fluid s four - velocity , @xmath70 is the rest frame baryon number density , and @xmath71 is the spatial volume enclosed by the constant pressure surface ( throughout this section , we use @xmath72 ) . for the non - rotating case , we have @xmath73 where @xmath74 is the radial component of the non - rotating metric . for the rotating case , one has to express the perturbed metric of @xcite in the non - rotating coordinate system . keeping terms to order @xmath65 , we get @xmath75\\ \label{eq : ut_rot } u^t & = & e^{-\phi}\left [ 1 - \xi\frac{d\phi}{dr } - h + \frac{1}{2}r^2\sin^2{\theta}{\bar{\omega}}^2e^{-2\phi}\right],\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath76 , @xmath77 , and @xmath78 are metric - perturbing functions which are proportional to @xmath65 and can be separated into spherical and quadrupolar parts , @xmath79 is the difference between the star s rotation frequency and the frame - dragging frequency , and @xmath80 is a lagrangian displacement that relates surfaces of constant @xmath81 in rotating and non - rotating stars of the same @xmath54 @xcite . the spherical polar angle is @xmath82 , and the mass enclosed inside the radius @xmath8 is @xmath83 . replacing equations ( [ eq : g_rot ] ) and ( [ eq : ut_rot ] ) in ( [ eq : baryon_law ] ) , keeping terms to order @xmath65 , taking the angular integral , and integrating by parts in @xmath8 , we get ) is not present , which is correct when integrating up to the surface , but not at intermediate layers . ] @xmath84dy + 4\pi r^2 e^{\lambda(\rho_c , r ) } \xi_0(\rho_c , r ) n(\rho_c , r).\end{aligned}\ ] ] the functions @xmath79 , @xmath85 , @xmath86 are obtained by solving first and second - order differential equations in the coordinate @xmath8 , as explained in @xcite , and which need a value for the rotation rate of the star @xmath55 and a non - rotating relativistic stellar structure as input . the zero subscript on functions indicates their spherical part ( the quadrupolar part vanishes when performing the angular integral , and the function @xmath78 has no spherical part ) . the remaining derivatives in equation ( [ eq : dpdomega2_final ] ) can be obtained from the non - rotating configuration . we first have @xmath87 where @xmath88 can be calculated analytically from the relativistic stellar structure equations @xcite . the other derivative has to be obtained by differentiating equation ( [ eq : n_norot ] ) : @xmath89 dy.\end{aligned}\ ] ] for numerical calculations , it is convenient to write the derivative in the first term of the right - hand side as @xmath90 in order to calculate the three derivatives with constant @xmath8 in the same way . the resulting spin - down compression rate , equation ( [ eq : dpdomega2_final ] ) , is plotted in figure [ fig : dpdomega2 ] , normalized by pressure and kepler frequency . the left panel displays results obtained for different eoss , with fixed central pressure , while the right panel shows results for different stellar models and fixed eos . as expected , the expression is negative , since spin - down compression means increase in @xmath49 with decrease of @xmath65 . compression is strongest at the center of the star . it can be shown that the central value is given by @xmath91 where @xmath92 is the adiabatic index , and the subscripts @xmath93 mean central values . since @xmath94 for the maximum mass non - rotating configuration , the divergence of the result for @xmath95 , as shown in the right panel of figure [ fig : dpdomega2 ] , is easy to understand . the graphs confirm the order - of - magnitude expression @xmath96 which implies that the perturbation is small as long as @xmath97 . with our expression for the spin - down compression rate at hand , we can write the change in the equilibrium number of particles of species @xmath27 with time as @xmath98 where the derivative @xmath99 is calculated in beta equilibrium . it is straightforward to check that the @xmath45 satisfy baryon number and charge conservation . the variables @xmath50 and @xmath49 are clearly continuous functions of @xmath8 in the non - rotating star , regardless of the presence of a phase transition . in appendix [ sec : continuity ] , we show explicitly that the same is true for @xmath100 . on the other hand , the equilibrium particle concentrations may have a discontinuous jump @xmath101 at the transition , which would contribute a dirac delta function to @xmath102 . therefore , there would be a finite contribution to @xmath45 from the transition , @xmath103_{trans}.\ ] ] to order of magnitude , the fractional contribution of a phase transition to the total value of @xmath45 ( and to the total heating of the star , if the reactions are of the same kind everywhere ) is the ratio of the jump @xmath101 to the total variation in @xmath104 across the stellar core . in the present work , as described in the following sections , phase transitions are not important , as the only transition in one of our eoss is fairly weak in each integration step as the ratio of the ( not necessarily small ) increment in @xmath105 to the small increment in @xmath49 . ] . in other cases , such as a star with a core of deconfined quarks of fairly uniform relative abundances , the phase transition may dominate the heating . in order to maintain diffusive equilibrium , a finite number of particles per unit time , @xmath106 , must be brought to ( or , if negative , away from ) the phase transition much faster than the latter progresses due to the spin - down of the star . therefore , a phase transition is the place where our assumption of diffusive equilibrium is most strongly put into question . however , in the case of interest to us , the low temperatures ( implying long mean - free paths and therefore fast diffusion ) and the extremely slow evolution should still validate this approximation . @xcite has shown that , due to the presence of two separate conserved charges ( baryon number and electric charge ) , phase transitions in neutron stars may not occur as a single discontinuity , but instead through a mixed phase , in which both phases coexist over a finite range in pressure ( or stellar radius ) . in this case , any discontinuities would be considerably weakened , if not fully eliminated , and we do not expect any special effects ( such as discussed above ) associated with the phase transitions . to implement the formalism of 2 numerically for the non - superfluid case , we need as input an eos , neutrino emissivities , a specific heat , and an envelope model . we then have to calculate the stellar structure and the corresponding integrals over the star . since our formalism requires a detailed knowledge of the structure of the star , we need an eos to determine the spatial dependence of the thermodynamical quantities by solving the relativistic stellar structure equations @xcite . in addition to the usual variables given in most published eoss ( pressure , energy density , chemical composition , and adiabatic index , all evaluated in chemical equilibrium ) , we need to know the partial derivatives of equation ( [ eq : dni_dmui ] ) ( which are easy to compute if we know the energy density or energy per baryon of interacting particles as a function of baryon number density and proton fraction ) and the baryon effective masses for computing reaction rates and heat capacities . we also want to cover a broad range of eoss , in order to assess the dependence of the quasi - equilibrium temperature on their properties . given our requirements , we have used three sets of eoss : 1 . the two most realistic eoss from @xcite ( apr ) for the core , supplemented with that of @xcite and @xcite , for the inner and outer crust , respectively ; 2 . five representative eoss from @xcite ( bpal ) for the core , with the same eoss for the inner and outer crust as for the previous set ; and 3 . a non - interacting fermi gas ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) for the whole star . in table [ tab : eos_par ] we list , for each eos , the mass @xmath83 , central energy density @xmath54 , coordinate radius @xmath20 , and effective radius as seen from infinity @xmath107 of the maximum - mass non - rotating configuration . since in the apr set the thermodynamical quantities are obtained from an analytical fit to tabulated many - body calculations @xcite , care has to be taken when interpreting results obtained for densities higher than the highest tabulated value , since extrapolation can lead to significant errors . this is the reason why we do not list the maximum - mass configuration for the a18 + @xmath108 eos . another feature of this set is that the a18 + @xmath108 + uix * eos becomes non - causal at densities greater than @xmath109 , which is the central density of a star of @xmath110 , slightly below the maximum mass formally allowed for this eos , @xmath111 . however , this eos is considered to be the state of the art among those derived from non - relativistic potentials , since it incorporates three - nucleon interactions and relativistic boost corrections @xcite . for this reason , we will in what follows take it as our reference eos . the eoss of the bpal set are labelled according to @xcite , who characterize them by the different magnitude of their nuclear incompressibility and density dependence of their symmetry energy . the values for the fermi gas eos listed in table [ tab : eos_par ] correspond to a central density slightly below the appearance of @xmath112 hyperons . the a18 + @xmath113 + uix * eos has an additional feature : a phase transition associated with the appearance of a neutral pion condensate at a density @xmath114 g @xmath4 . in order to connect the normal phase with the pion - condensed one , we assumed a maxwell transition , which implies a discontinuity in all thermodynamical quantities but the temperature , pressure and neutron chemical potential , resulting in an energy - density jump of 6.6% . @xcite also considered the possibility of a mixed - phase transition ( e.g. , @xcite ) , concluding that ( for a standard , @xmath115 neutron star ) the shell containing the mixed phase is only @xmath116 m thick . they also estimated the debye screening length of electrons to be smaller than the characteristic size of structures ( by a factor 6 - 12 ) , which would favor the maxwell transition as a better approximation to the real situation @xcite . also listed in table [ tab : eos_par ] are the kepler periods @xmath117 corresponding to most of the eoss , which are necessary in order to determine the extent to which the slow - rotation approximation holds for treating the spin - down compression . the apr and pal values were computed with the empirical formula of @xcite . this gives , for each eos , the maximum allowed rotation frequency in terms of the mass and radius of the maximum - mass non - rotating configuration . the accuracy for non - causal eoss is somewhat lowered from its optimal value of 1.5% @xcite , which applies for a18 + @xmath118 + uix*. the reason why the entry corresponding to a18 + @xmath108 is empty is that its maximum mass configurations occur at a central density which requires substantial extrapolation , making the empirical formula an unreliable estimator of @xmath57 . for the fermi gas eos , we adopt the exact value calculated for a pure neutron gas by @xcite , since the empirical formula of @xcite does not work for this case . so far , the fastest known msp is psr b1937 + 21 , with a period of 1.56 ms @xcite , which is about three times longer than kepler periods for all realistic eoss . since we are not taking superfluidity into account , direct and modified urca reactions are the dominant neutrino emission mechanisms . we have therefore neglected additional neutrino emission processes in the core and the crust of the star , and ignored possible modifications in urca rates due to the neutral pion condensate of the apr set ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . away from beta equilibrium , neutrino emissivities and net reaction rates per unit volume of urca - type reactions in non - superfluid matter are given by @xcite @xmath119 respectively , where @xmath120 is the neutrino emissivity in equilibrium due to reaction @xmath43 , @xmath121 is the chemical imbalance affected by reaction @xmath43 , @xmath122 is the local temperature , @xmath70 is the baryon number density , @xmath78 is boltzmann s constant , and @xmath123 and @xmath124 are dimensionless control functions which depend on whether the reaction is of direct of modified urca type . these functions are given by @xcite @xmath125 where the subscripts @xmath126 and @xmath83 mean direct and modified urca , respectively . a finite @xmath127 of either sign enhances neutrino emission due to the even nature of the functions @xmath123 . the amount of energy released by each reaction of type @xmath43 is @xmath127 @xcite , thus the total energy dissipation rate per unit volume is @xmath128 with the signs defined by @xmath129 where @xmath130 is the rate per unit volume of the reaction that transforms the particle set @xmath48 to the set @xmath131 . this sign convention ensures that reaction rates are enhanced in the direction which restores equilibrium , since the functions @xmath124 are odd . the equilibrium emissivities of both direct and modified urca reactions can be written as @xmath132 where @xmath133 is a slowly varying function of @xmath70 , @xmath134 for direct urca , and @xmath135 for modified urca ( e.g. , @xcite ) . this decoupling of the temperature from the spatial part introduces a great simplification . to obtain the non - equilibrium neutrino luminosities and net reaction rates , we first define @xmath136 where we have used equations ( [ eq : t_int ] ) , ( [ eq : l_nu ] ) and ( [ eq : delta_mu_infty ] ) , and where @xmath137 is the equilibrium neutrino luminosity due to reaction @xmath43 . combining equations ( [ eq : q_noneq ] ) , ( [ eq : dgamma_noneq ] ) , ( [ eq : xi_def ] ) and ( [ eq : int_qeq ] ) , we obtain @xmath138 we denote modified urca reactions with electrons and muons by @xmath43 = @xmath139 and @xmath140 , respectively , in each case adding the contributions of the neutron and proton branches @xcite . direct urca with electrons or muons is denoted by @xmath43 = @xmath141 and @xmath142 , respectively . from the apr set , the only eos which allows direct urca is a18 + @xmath108 + uix * , exceeding the threshold for direct urca with electrons at @xmath143 g @xmath4 , which is the central density of a star of 2 @xmath144 . direct urca with muons lies in the non - causal regime . with the exception of bpal31 , all the eoss of the pal set allow electron direct urca . muon direct urca is forbidden for both bpal21 and bpal31 . combining equations ( [ eq : l_h ] ) , ( [ eq : delta_mu_infty ] ) , ( [ eq : dgamma_noneq ] ) , ( [ eq : q_h ] ) , ( [ eq : xi_def ] ) , and ( [ eq : int_dgamma ] ) , we obtain the heating luminosity corresponding to the reaction @xmath43 @xmath145 we can combine the heating and cooling contributions of each reaction into a single expression , which will prove to be useful for physical insight . if we define @xmath146 we can write the difference of equations ( [ eq : l_nu_j ] ) and ( [ eq : l_h_j ] ) as @xmath147 thus , the relative size of @xmath148 and @xmath149 will determine , through the functions @xmath150 , whether there is net cooling or heating due to the neutrino emitting reactions . since the functions @xmath150 are even , they do not depend on the sign of the @xmath151 . we plot the functions @xmath152 for the direct and modified urca case in figure [ fig : m_j ] . with @xmath153 , the constant term in @xmath123 gives the conventional cooling case . as @xmath154 grows , the cooling is enhanced by the additional neutrino emission due to the chemical imbalance , reaching a maximum cooling at @xmath155 . for larger values of @xmath154 , the heating becomes important , completely balancing the cooling for @xmath156 . for very large values of @xmath154 , the heating dominates , growing as @xmath157 and @xmath158 in the direct and modified urca case , respectively . in this limit , a fixed fraction of the energy released is emitted as neutrinos , 3/8 and 1/2 for modified and direct urca , respectively . the remainder stays behind , heating the star . since we want to simulate the evolution of a msp which has finished accretion , we use the fully accreted envelope model of @xcite to calculate the effective surface temperature @xmath159 where @xmath160 is the surface gravity in units of @xmath161 cm s@xmath162 , @xmath163 is the internal temperature in units of @xmath164 k , and @xmath165 . the photon luminosity then follows from equation ( [ eq : l_gamma ] ) . an accreted envelope is more heat transparent than a pure iron one for @xmath166 k , leading to faster cooling , whereas for @xmath167 k the opposite happens @xcite . to calculate the integral in equation ( [ eq : capcal ] ) , we use the specific heat capacities at constant volume @xmath16 for degenerate , non - superfluid fermions ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . in analogy with the neutrino emissivity , we can separate the temperature dependence from the spatial one . from equation ( [ eq : capcal ] ) , we can define @xmath168 where @xmath169 and @xmath170 are the fermi momentum and effective mass of species @xmath27 , respectively . the latter can be obtained analytically for the apr and pal eoss ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) , while for the noninteracting fermi gas we use @xmath171 , where @xmath172 is the chemical potential of species @xmath27 . the sum is performed over all particle species and the integral is done over the region where each particle species exists . we take only free particles into account , neglecting the heat capacity due to the lattice of ions in the crust . in this work , we are neglecting processes in the crust which might also modify the total number of neutrons , protons , or electrons . we may ask here if this choice is a good approximation for computing the evolution of the chemical imbalances , since the short diffusion timescale limit means that the chemical equilibrium everywhere in the star can be restored by reactions occurring wherever these are fastest . @xcite calculated the heating of a neutron star due to spin - down compression in the crust . they found that neutron absorptions in the inner crust are the dominant non - equilibrium process , producing a very small heating rate @xmath173 , where @xmath174 is the spin - down power . although they did not consider neutron diffusion between different layers in the star , and modelled the spin - down compression as a one - dimensional process , we take their result to suggest a very small contribution to the total heating . since the inner crust accounts for about 2% of the total baryons in the star and the neutrino emissivities of the core overwhelm crustal emission processes , we integrated equations ( [ eq : bij_def ] ) only over the core and neglected processes in the crust , under the assumption that the error introduced would be small . our results confirm our assumption , since for the more realistic eoss we obtained heating rates due to core processes much bigger than iida & sato s results ( see equation [ eq : ratio_edot ] ) . we have to warn that neglecting the crust may not be a good approximation if superfluidity is included , since non - equilibrium processes in the crust can even overtake suppressed urca reactions in the core . it has also been suggested by @xcite that direct urca reactions could occur at the crust - core interface . we have not explored this possibility . however , we are aware that even a small amount of direct urca reactions in the inner crust would have a significant effect on the evolution of chemical imbalances . finally , we write the coupled equations for the time evolution of the temperature and the chemical imbalances explicitly for the non - superfluid case with @xmath2 composition , taking direct or modified urca reactions into account . for the internal temperature , from equations ( [ eq : dot_t ] ) , ( [ eq : capcal ] ) , ( [ eq : l_h ] ) , ( [ eq : l_nu ] ) , ( [ eq : l_gamma ] ) , ( [ eq : net_cooling ] ) , and ( [ eq : c_int ] ) , we get @xmath175.\end{aligned}\ ] ] for the chemical disequilibria , using equations ( [ eq : dni_dmui ] ) , ( [ eq : dni_def ] ) , ( [ eq : dot_ni ] ) , ( [ eq : dot_eta1 ] ) , ( [ eq : dot_eta2 ] ) , and ( [ eq : nieq ] ) , we obtain @xmath176 where we have defined @xmath177 and @xmath178 typical values for the different constants are plotted in figure [ fig : ctes ] . since @xmath179 , equations ( [ eq : evolucion_eta1 ] ) and ( [ eq : evolucion_eta2 ] ) have a positive term , proportional to the spin - down power , which arises from the change in the equilibrium concentrations of each particle species with spin - down and makes the chemical imbalances grow . the remaining terms , opposite in sign to @xmath180 and @xmath181 , account for the effect of reactions trying to restore beta equilibrium . equation ( [ eq : evolucion_ti ] ) has the photon luminosity as a negative term , and the net contribution of neutrino reactions , equation ( [ eq : net_cooling ] ) , which may be positive or negative depending on the absolute value of @xmath182 and @xmath183 . for numerical calculations , the evolution of @xmath184 was computed assuming magnetic dipole braking with no field decay , relating magnetic field , rotation period , and period derivative by the conventional formula @xmath185 g , where @xmath49 is measured in seconds . a typical solution of equations ( [ eq : evolucion_ti ] ) , ( [ eq : evolucion_eta1 ] ) , and ( [ eq : evolucion_eta2 ] ) is shown in the left panel of figure [ fig : evol_xi ] . first , the temperature starts falling as in the conventional cooling case , while the chemical imbalances grow due to spin - down compression . at some point , the ratios @xmath182 and @xmath183 ( right panel of figure [ fig : evol_xi ] ) are big enough , so that the net contributions of neutrino reactions , equation ( [ eq : net_cooling ] ) , are positive , and their sum exceeds @xmath186 . the temperature then starts rising . the chemical imbalances continue to grow , more slowly than the temperature and hence reducing @xmath182 and @xmath183 . finally , the star can arrive at a _ quasi - equilibrium _ state , where the rate at which spin - down modifies equilibrium concentrations is the same as the rate at which reactions drive the system towards the equilibrium configuration , with heating and cooling balancing each other @xcite . the subsequent thermal evolution can then be approximated by the simultaneous solution of the equations @xmath187 and @xmath188 . we discuss this _ quasi - equilibrium solution _ in detail in 4.2 . the pure modified urca case ( @xmath189 ) is the simplest to analyze . figure [ fig : evol_tdmuvarios ] shows the thermal evolution of the same star as in figure [ fig : evol_xi ] , this time with different initial conditions of internal temperature ( left ) and chemical imbalances ( right ) . the spin - down parameters were chosen so that the arrival at the quasi - equilibrium state is clearly visible , the short - dashed lines being the quasi - equilibrium solutions . we note that , in both cases , the value of the temperature at the quasi - equilibrium state and the time required to arrive do not depend on initial conditions . if direct urca reactions are open , solutions change noticeably . in figure [ fig : evol_urca ] we show the thermal evolution of three different stellar models built with the same eos , with identical initial conditions and spin - down parameters . the 1.4@xmath144 star is the same as that of figure [ fig : evol_tdmuvarios ] , with only modified urca reactions in operation . the 2@xmath144 star has electron direct urca operating , with the corresponding muon reaction forbidden . we see that the minimum temperature is higher and occurs at a much earlier time , after which the system reaches a metastable " quasi - equilibrium state , corresponding to partial equilibration between @xmath190 and @xmath191 . however , @xmath192 continues to grow , leading the system to a final quasi - equilibrium state , determined by muon modified urca . the 2.17@xmath144 star has direct urca with electrons and muons . this time the final quasi - equilibrium state occurs even earlier than the metastable " quasi - equilibrium of the 2@xmath144 star , with the temperature at about the same level . when only modified urca reactions operate , it is possible to solve analytically for the quasi - equilibrium values of the photon luminosity @xmath193 and chemical imbalances @xmath194 and @xmath195 , as function of stellar model and current value of @xmath184 . what makes these approximations possible is the high value of @xmath182 and @xmath183 at quasi - equilibrium . from the right panel of figure [ fig : evol_xi ] , we see that , at quasi - equilibrium ( @xmath196 yr ) , @xmath197 . this enables us to ignore all but the greatest power in the functions @xmath198 and @xmath199 ( equations [ eq : f_m_def ] , [ eq : h_m_def ] , and [ eq : m_j_def ] ) : @xmath200 the error in this approximation , for @xmath201 , is less than one part in 100 . to solve for @xmath193 , we set @xmath202 and use equations ( [ eq : c_h_def ] ) and ( [ eq : c_m_def ] ) to rewrite ( [ eq : evolucion_ti ] ) , ( [ eq : evolucion_eta1 ] ) , and ( [ eq : evolucion_eta2 ] ) as @xmath203 solving for @xmath194 and @xmath195 in equations ( [ eq : dot_eta1_qe ] ) and ( [ eq : dot_eta2_qe ] ) , we get @xmath204 where we have used equations ( [ eq : w_npe_def ] ) and ( [ eq : w_npm_def ] ) and the fact that @xmath205 . both chemical imbalances at quasi - equilibrium are positive , since @xmath184 and @xmath206 are negative . we finally replace equations ( [ eq : eta1_qe ] ) and ( [ eq : eta2_qe ] ) in ( [ eq : dot_ti_qe ] ) , to obtain the photon luminosity : @xmath207|\omega \dot{\omega}|^{8/7}.\ ] ] an interesting feature of equation ( [ eq : l_gamma_qe ] ) is that it does not depend on envelope model . the reason is that the limit @xmath208 implies that reactions are completely determined by chemical imbalances , eliminating any dependence on internal temperature . the energy released is divided in fixed fractions between neutrino emission ( @xmath209 = 3/8 $ ] ) and heating ( @xmath210 ) , the latter being radiated entirely as photons . note also that the ratio @xmath211 depends only on eos and stellar model , and is of order unity , thus we will make reference to either of them as @xmath212 . for the entire range of eoss and stellar models , we can write @xmath213 where @xmath214 is the period derivative measured in units of @xmath215 , and @xmath216 the period in ms . values for different stellar models built with the a18 + @xmath108 + uix * eos are shown in figure [ fig : ctes ] . using equation ( [ eq : l_gamma ] ) , we can rewrite equation ( [ eq : l_gamma_plnum ] ) in terms of the effective temperature : @xmath217 this time , the uncertainty due to eos and stellar model is smaller than 25% . we can also write the ratio of quasi - equilibrium photon luminosity ( and thus total heating rate ) to the spin - down power @xmath174 @xmath218 it is also possible to calculate @xmath219 for the quasi - equilibrium state . its spin - down power dependence , @xmath220 where @xmath221 is the exponent of the envelope model of @xcite ( see [ sec : envelope ] ) , shows that increasing @xmath222 reduces @xmath223 , decreasing the accuracy of the analytical approximation , although very slowly . although we did not include hyperons in our calculations , we may ask how their presence could modify the thermal evolution . the first particles to appear after muons are probably the @xmath224 and @xmath225 hyperons , which require the introduction of two additional chemical imbalances : @xmath226 once hyperons are present , the following non - leptonic reactions are open ( e.g. , @xcite ) : @xmath227 reaction ( [ eq : nnsp ] ) proceeds via weak interactions , since it does not conserve strangeness , while ( [ eq : nnln ] ) proceeds via strong interactions . both reactions have timescales several orders of magnitude shorter than beta processes @xcite . therefore , imbalances ( [ eq : eta_nnsp ] ) and ( [ eq : eta_nl ] ) remain small compared to @xmath228 and @xmath229 , and reactions ( [ eq : nnsp ] ) and ( [ eq : nnln ] ) contribute negligibly to the total heat generation . moreover , since chemical imbalances associated to direct or modified urca reactions with hyperons are linear combinations of @xmath230 , @xmath231 , @xmath228 , and @xmath229 , the latter two will determine the heat generation through both nucleon and hyperon reactions . in order to assess the importance of including the urca processes involving hyperons in addition to the nucleon processes , consider , as an example , the @xmath112 direct urca reactions @xmath232 whose associated chemical imbalance is @xmath233 . their net effect on equations ( [ eq : evolucion_eta1 ] ) and ( [ eq : evolucion_eta2 ] ) is to enhance the electron direct urca rate according to @xmath234 , reducing the chemical imbalance and thus the stellar surface temperature . this correction is small , since direct urca reactions with hyperons are at least a factor 5 weaker than their nucleon analogs @xcite . for the pure modified urca case , it can be checked from equation ( [ eq : l_gamma_qe ] ) that the correction to the surface temperature introduced by adding several reactions involving hyperons is a factor @xmath235^{1/28}$ ] , where @xmath236 and @xmath237 are the nucleon and hyperon urca luminosities , respectively . thus , the corrections due to hyperons in a purely modified urca or purely direct urca scenario are fairly negligible . the only important effect of hyperons in the context of rotochemical heating is that , in their presence , conditions for direct urca processes may become more easily satisfied , as is the case with reactions involving @xmath238 @xcite . the steep increase of the proton concentration with the appearance of @xmath112 hyperons ( e.g. , @xcite ) can also cause the condition for nucleon direct urca to be satisfied at lower densities than if hyperons are excluded from the models . we may now ask which of the known msps are likely to be in the quasi - equilibrium state . to answer this question , we need to know how long it takes to arrive at the quasi - equilibrium state , and if real pulsars are older than this time . since the negative equilibration " terms due to reactions in equations ( [ eq : evolucion_eta1 ] ) and ( [ eq : evolucion_eta2 ] ) are important only for imbalances near their equilibrium values ( recall the limit @xmath239 ) , we can assume that the initial evolution of @xmath212 is due only to @xmath1 : @xmath240 integrating over time , we get @xmath241.\ ] ] for the true solution to have reached the quasi - equilibrium state , this approximate solution must exceed @xmath242 . using equations ( [ eq : eta1_qe ] ) or ( [ eq : eta2_qe ] ) , together with equation ( [ eq : eta_ell_aprox ] ) , we may express this condition as an upper limit on the initial spin period @xmath243 with @xmath244 ( here and in the rest of this subsection , we assume that only modified urca processes are active . ) given the current spin parameters of a pulsar , condition ( [ eq : p0_qe ] ) gives the highest initial period it can have had , so that enough time has elapsed for it to have reached the quasi - equilibrium state . for msps , the constant @xmath48 is generally small . for a 1.4@xmath144 star built with the a18 + @xmath108 + uix * eos , we get @xmath245 values for other stellar masses are shown in figure [ fig : ctes ] . from equation ( [ eq : etapto_aprox ] ) , we can estimate a characteristic timescale for equilibration as @xmath246 @xcite calculated the thermal evolution of neutron stars with rotochemical heating for different values of the magnetic field , using the magnetic dipole braking model with no field decay . his conclusion was that a necessary condition for the quasi - equilibrium solution to be a good approximation to the exact one is that the spin - down timescale has to be longer than that for the growth of chemical imbalances . to quantify this , we estimate the spin - down timescale as the characteristic age , @xmath247 and take the ratio of @xmath248 to it , getting @xmath249 figure [ fig : evol_chiteqvarios ] shows the internal temperature of our conventional star after the rise from the minimum temperature , for different initial values of @xmath48 , with fixed initial @xmath248 . dotted lines are the quasi - equilibrium solutions at the instantaneous value of @xmath250 . the figure suggests that , for high values of @xmath48 , exact and quasi - equilibrium solutions depart from each other , whereas for small @xmath48 , solutions remain `` together '' . in fact , all solutions depart from each other , the departure being slower with time for smaller @xmath48 . for more general spin - down laws with arbitrary braking index @xmath251 , it can be shown analytically that this is true for @xmath252 . the increase in @xmath253 , where @xmath254 is the exact solution and @xmath255 the quasi - equilibrium one , is roughly linear with time . for @xmath256 at @xmath257 , and assuming a standard braking index @xmath258 , @xmath259 is @xmath260 lower than @xmath254 at @xmath261 , the difference growing 2% every @xmath262 yr . rewriting equation ( [ eq : a_pppto ] ) in terms of the magnetic field , @xmath263 where @xmath264 is the surface magnetic field in units of @xmath262 g , we can easily understand the results of @xcite , since increasing @xmath131 with fixed @xmath265 increases the initial value of @xmath48 . relating @xmath48 at the present time and at @xmath257 for an arbitrary , but constant , braking index , @xmath266 shows that the former is greater than the latter for all reasonable values of @xmath70 . thus , a small current value of @xmath48 is a good indicator that the star remains close to the quasi - equilibrium state , as long as it satisfies @xmath267 . since constraints on the initial periods @xmath268 of a few msps have been obtained from the cooling ages of their white dwarf companions @xcite , we can check which objects are likely at the quasi - equilibrium state . in table [ tab : predictions ] , further discussed in [ sec : othermsps ] , we show the range in @xmath268 for some msps obtained by @xcite . we made no distinction between the @xmath269 and @xmath258 case , and adopted the widest possible range in @xmath268 . in table [ tab : predictions ] we also show the value of @xmath48 and the upper limit on initial spin period @xmath270 required for the msp to be currently in the quasi - equilibrium state . among msps with constraints on initial periods , psr j1012 + 5307 is the only one not satisfying the conditions . the small values of @xmath48 imply that any initial periods substantially shorter than the current ones will leave the msps in equilibrium by the present time . recently , @xcite measured ultraviolet emission from psr j0437 - 4715 , the most probable explanation being that it corresponds to thermal radiation . since this object satisfies @xmath271 with small @xmath48 , we assume that it is already at the quasi - equilibrium state . in figure [ fig : ts_rinf ] , we plot the blackbody fit of @xcite as dashed lines , which correspond to 68% and 90% confidence contours . we overplot our values of @xmath272 for the spin parameters of psr j0437 - 4715 @xcite , as function of @xmath107 , for the eoss listed in table [ tab : eos_par ] . the bold lines show the range in @xmath107 corresponding to the mass constraint of @xcite , @xmath273 . the complete mass range for each eos goes from 1@xmath144 to 0.95@xmath274 . the upper limit was chosen to avoid the divergence in the spin - down compression rate for masses near @xmath274 ( see figure [ fig : dpdomega2 ] ) , which makes @xmath272 also diverge due to @xmath206 ( see equation [ eq : l_gamma_qe ] ) . the best agreement with observations is reached if only modified urca reactions are present . when direct urca reactions open , there are two abrupt drops in @xmath272 with increasing stellar mass , the first one ( @xmath275 ) due to electron direct urca , and the second ( @xmath276 ) due to muon direct urca . this can be seen in figure [ fig : ts_rinf ] for the curves calculated with bpal11 and a18 + @xmath108 + uix * , as examples of only electron direct urca , and in the curves corresponding to bpal32 and bpal33 , which have electron and muon direct urca . perfect agreement could be obtained by allowing masses within @xmath277 of the maximum - mass non - rotating configuration , for the eoss with only modified urca . however , we consider this scenario very unlikely . using the eoss which have only modified urca reactions within the allowed mass for psr j0437 - 4715 , we can constrain the predicted effective temperature to the narrow range @xmath278 k , about 20% lower than the blackbody fit of @xcite . there are three possible reasons why we are not matching their results : 1 . we are not taking superfluidity into account . this would reduce urca reaction rates , lengthening the equilibration timescale and raising the quasi - equilibrium temperature @xcite . we are neglecting other heating mechanisms ( some of them directly related to superfluidity ) , which could further raise the temperature at any stage in the thermal evolution . nonetheless , in msps , all proposed mechanisms are less important than rotochemical heating @xcite . 3 . the thermal spectrum could deviate from a blackbody , in the same way as the isolated neutron star rx j1856 - 3754 , which has a well - determined blackbody x - ray spectrum that underpredicts the optical flux @xcite , indicating a more complex spectral shape of its thermal emission . kargaltsev and collaborators stress the fact that psr j0437 - 4715 , despite its much larger spin - down age , has a higher surface temperature than the upper limit for the younger , `` classical '' pulsar j0108 - 1431 , @xmath279 k , inferred from the optical non - detection by @xcite . in this regard , we note that the spin - down power ( @xmath280 ) of the latter pulsar is 680 times lower than that of j0437 , making rotochemical heating substantially less important . its equilibration timescale , according to equation ( [ eq : tau_eq_def ] ) , is @xmath281 yr , longer than the age of the universe and certainly much longer than the spin - down age of the pulsar . thus , it is not expected to be even close to reaching its quasi - equilibrium state ( although it is old enough to have lost its initial heat content ) . its actual temperature should therefore be substantially smaller than the predicted quasi - equilibrium surface temperature , which is already @xmath282 times lower than that of j0437 , well below the observational upper limit . in table [ tab : predictions ] , we provide predictions of @xmath272 ( assuming modified urca reactions and no superfluidity ) for several msps . since the high - energy part of their expected thermal spectrum is highly absorbed by neutral hydrogen in the interstellar medium , we chose to order them by decreasing predicted quasi - equilibrium flux in the low - energy ( rayleigh - jeans ) regime , @xmath283 where @xmath284 is the distance to the object . each @xmath285 entry in table [ tab : predictions ] is scaled by the value for psr j0437 - 4715 . the first group of msps after psr j0437 - 4715 are nearby , single msps , for which @xmath285 is expected to be larger than for the binary msps , for which the initial period has been estimated from their white dwarf companion ( see [ sec : conditions ] ) . we consider the former as the primary targets for observations analogous to those of @xcite . however , even for psr j0437 - 4715 , the nearest and brightest msp known to date , the detection of thermal emission is rather difficult , so the observation of other objects of table [ tab : predictions ] will be a real challenge . the second group of msps are those with estimates for @xmath268 . however , their low fluxes make the detection of their thermal emission impossible for current instruments . optical detections are even more daunting than those in the ultraviolet . the extrapolated rayleigh - jeans spectrum of psr j0437 - 4715 gives magnitudes @xmath286 , @xmath287 , and @xmath288 , which are completely overwhelmed by the white dwarf companion . the most promising single msps have about three times lower expected fluxes at earth , i. e. , are another 1.2 magnitudes fainter , beyond the reach of current telescopes . in this work , we have made an extensive study of the effect of rotochemical heating in non - superfluid millisecond pulsars . we have set up a general formalism for the thermal evolution in the framework of general relativity , which takes the stellar structure fully into account and can be extended to include both superfluidity and exotic particles . a key ingredient in this formalism is the spin - down compression rate based on the slow - rotation approximation of @xcite . the main consequence of rotochemical heating is the arrival at a quasi - equilibrium state , in which the effective temperature of a neutron star depends only on the current value of the spin - down power . we argue that most of the known msps are very likely in the quasi - equilibrium state . if only modified urca reactions are allowed , the quasi - equilibrium bolometric photon luminosity in the non - superfluid case can be well approximated by @xmath289 independent of the neutron star envelope model . the influence of eos and stellar model on the quasi - equilibrium state is very weak , the only significant factor being the occurrence of direct urca reactions . if they are open for both muons and electrons , quasi - equilibrium temperatures are low , as in the conventional cooling case . if they are open only for electrons , the system arrives at a metastable " quasi - equilibrium , after which it proceeds as if only modified urca reactions with muons were present . the highest temperatures are reached when all direct urca reactions are forbidden . even our highest predicted quasi - equilibrium effective temperatures are lower than the blackbody fit of @xcite to the uv emission of psr j0437 - 4715 by about 20% . the inclusion of superfluidity will likely raise our predicted temperatures , being the subject of future work . we thank g. pavlov and o. kargaltsev for letting us know about their work in advance of publication and for kindly providing the data for figure [ fig : ts_rinf ] . the authors are also grateful to m. taghizadeh , m. van kerkwijk , r. mignani , d. page , m. catelan , m. a. daz , c. dib , and p. jofr for discussions that benefited the present paper , and an anonymous referee for thoughtful comments that improved its final version . this work made extensive use of nasa s astrophysics data system service , and received financial support from fondecyt through grant # 1020840 . in this appendix , we show that , in uniformly rotating , relativistic stars in hydrostatic equilibrium , composed of a perfect fluid , the surfaces of constant pressure and those of constant energy density coincide , as in the newtonian case , even if the equation of state is not barotropic . in addition , the gravitational redshift is constant on the same surfaces . this result , together with the diffusive equilibrium condition , allows us to describe the spin - down compression in terms of lagrangian changes of thermodynamic variables on isobaric surfaces enclosing a fixed baryon number , since all thermodynamical quantities are constant on each isobar . as a by - product , we also provide an alternative derivation of the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium for uniformly rotating , relativistic stars . the assumption a perfect ( i.e. , non - dissipative ) fluid , whose stress - energy tensor depends only on the energy density @xmath81 and ( isotropic ) pressure @xmath49 , is of course not strictly true in the astrophysical situation of interest in this paper , in which entropy is generated by non - equilibrium weak interactions , particle diffusion , and heat conduction , and lost ( from the star ) through the emission of neutrinos and photons . however , the total energy dissipated ( and eventually lost ) along the star s lifetime is much smaller than that associated with the mass , random motions , and interactions of its particles , as well as its rotation , and the time scale of the release of this energy is many orders of magnitude longer than the dynamical time and the rotation period of the star . therefore , the contribution of these dissipative processes to the energy and momentum fluxes is extremely small and can be neglected in the stress - energy tensor . this is in line with the usual approach ( also used in neutron star cooling calculations and in the rest of this paper ) of neglecting thermal effects when calculating the structure of the star , which is regarded as a fixed background on which thermal processes take place . the metric of a stationary , axially symmetric system can be written in the form ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) : @xmath290 where the metric coefficients are functions of @xmath8 and @xmath82 only . the components of the 4-velocity of any fluid element of the uniformly rotating star are @xmath291 , and @xmath292 , with @xmath293\right)^{-1/2}.\ ] ] we note that @xmath294 is the gravitational redshift factor , which corrects the energy of a freely moving particle , as it is measured by observers co - moving with fluid elements on different surfaces inside the star . , where @xmath295 are the covariant components of the particle s 4-momentum . due to the symmetries of the metric , the expression within parenthesis is conserved along the particle s world line , and is its redshifted energy . ] the energy - momentum conservation equation can then be written as @xmath296 where @xmath297 are the components of the stress - energy tensor of a perfect fluid . applying to this equation a projection operator orthogonal to the four - velocity , @xmath298 @xcite , we get @xmath299 since the only non - vanishing terms are those with @xmath300 and @xmath301 taking the values @xmath302 , the relevant connection coefficients are @xmath303 hence , equation ( [ eq : cons_enmom ] ) yields @xmath304 using equation ( [ eq : ut_def ] ) , we arrive at the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium @xmath305 which is in agreement with the result of @xcite , for the special case of rigid rotation . this shows that the redshift factor @xmath294 is also constant on the surfaces of constant @xmath49 . thus , we can write @xmath306 which implies that @xmath81 is also constant on the same surfaces . in this appendix , we show that each term of the spin - down compression rate , equation ( [ eq : dpdomega2_final ] ) , is continuous across a phase transition , even if the energy density and baryon number density change discontinuously . we use units with @xmath307 . the discontinuous quantities in the derivative @xmath308 , equation ( [ eq : dndp_def ] ) , are @xmath70 and @xmath88 . the gibbs free energy per unit volume for @xmath2 matter in beta equilibrium at @xmath309 is @xmath310 since , at a phase transition , the pressure @xmath49 and neutron chemical potential @xmath311 are continuous , the fractional size of the number density jump can be written as @xmath312 where @xmath313 is the positive jump in number density . from the relativistic stellar structure equations , we have @xmath314 the fractional size of the corresponding jump across the phase transition is @xmath315 thus , from equations ( [ eq : dn_n ] ) and ( [ eq : ddpdr_dpdr ] ) , we see that the quantity @xmath316 is continuous across a phase transition , and so is @xmath317 . regarding the derivative @xmath318 , equation ( [ eq : dndomega2_n0 ] ) , since the jump in @xmath70 is integrated in equation ( [ eq : n_norot ] ) , @xmath319 is continuous . for @xmath320 , the jump in @xmath70 due to the last term of equation ( [ eq : n_rot ] ) is cancelled by the contribution from @xmath321 in the integral . using @xmath322 where @xmath301 is dirac s delta function and @xmath323 , with @xmath324 the pressure at which the phase transition occurs , we can write @xmath325 where @xmath326 is the step function . equation ( [ eq : disc_dndomega2 ] ) is equal to minus the jump ( increasing @xmath8 ) of the last term in equation ( [ eq : n_rot ] ) . finally , for the derivative @xmath327 , the contribution from @xmath328 to the integral in equation ( [ eq : dndn0_p ] ) cancels out the discontinuity due to @xmath70 in the first term . using @xmath329 where @xmath330 , and @xmath331 the radial coordinate at which @xmath332 , we can write @xmath333 which is the negative of the jump ( increasing @xmath8 ) of the first term in equation ( [ eq : dndn0_p ] ) , since the sign of @xmath334 is also @xmath335 . the right panel of figure [ fig : dpdomega2 ] shows the spin - down compression rate inside the core of several stellar models built with the a18 + @xmath108 + uix * eos , which has a phase transition . the occurrence of the transition can be seen as a ( fairly harmless ) discontinuity in the derivative of each curve . lccccc a18 + @xmath108 & 1.55 & 1.86 & 9.81 & 13.42 & - + a18 + @xmath108 + uix@xmath336 & 2.19 & 2.78 & 9.97 & 16.79 & 0.51 + bpal 11 & 1.42 & 4.45 & 8.42 & 11.86 & 0.54 + bpal 21 & 1.70 & 3.46 & 9.33 & 13.69 & 0.56 + bpal 31 & 1.91 & 2.86 & 10.10 & 15.18 & 0.59 + bpal 32 & 1.95 & 2.66 & 10.56 & 15.64 & 0.63 + bpal 33 & 1.97 & 2.53 & 10.92 & 15.94 & 0.66 + fermi gas & 0.62 & 1.10 & 12.77 & 13.80 & 0.98 lccccccccc j0437 - 4715 & 5.76 & 1.86 & 0.14 & 0.72 & 1 & 0.17 & 5.33 & 2.45.3 & 1 , 2 + j1024 - 0719 & 5.16 & @xmath3371.85 & @xmath3370.25 & @xmath3370.79 & @xmath338 0.35 & @xmath3370.14 & @xmath3394.82 & & 3 , 4 + j2124 - 3358 & 4.93 & 1.23 & 0.27 & 0.74 & 0.28 & 0.13 & 4.64 & & 3 , 4 + j0030 + 0451 & 4.87 & @xmath3371.00 & 0.32 & @xmath3370.70 & @xmath3370.19 & @xmath3370.12 & @xmath3394.60 & & 4 , 5 + j1744 - 1134 & 4.07 & 0.71 & 0.36 & 0.74 & 0.15 & 0.09 & 3.90 & & 6 + b1257 + 12 & 6.22 & 4.26 & 0.45 & 0.86 & 0.12 & 0.22 & 5.63 & & 3 , 4 + j0034 - 0534 & 1.88 & @xmath3370.67 & 0.53 & @xmath3371.41 & @xmath3370.14 & @xmath3370.03 & @xmath3391.85 & @xmath3371.4 & 2 , 4 , 7 + j1012 + 5307 & 5.26 & 1.34 & 0.41 & 0.71 & 0.11 & 0.14 & 4.93 & @xmath3395.1 & 2 , 4 , 8 + b1855 + 09 & 5.36 & 1.74 & 0.90 & 0.76 & 0.03 & 0.15 & 5.00 & @xmath3374.6 & 2 , 3 , 9 + j1713 + 0747 & 4.57 & 0.81 & 1.10 & 0.70 & 0.02 & 0.11 & 4.35 & 2.23.1 & 2 , 10 + j1640 + 2224 & 3.16 & 0.16 & 1.15 & 0.60 & 0.01 & 0.05 & 3.08 & @xmath3391.6 & 2 , 4 , 11 + j2019 + 2425 & 3.93 & @xmath3370.70 & 1.49 & @xmath3370.76 & @xmath3370.01 & @xmath3370.08 & @xmath3393.87 & 0.93.9 & 2 , 4 , 12 Abstract:
[ "rotochemical heating originates in a departure from beta equilibrium due to spin - down compression in a rotating neutron star . the main consequence is that the star eventually arrives at a quasi - equilibrium state , in which the thermal photon luminosity depends only on the current value of the spin - down power , which is directly measurable . only in millisecond pulsars the spin - down power remains high long enough for this state to be reached with a substantial luminosity . we report an extensive study of the effect of this heating mechanism on the thermal evolution of millisecond pulsars , developing a general formalism in the slow - rotation approximation of general relativity that takes the spatial structure of the star fully into account , and using a sample of realistic equations of state to solve the non - superfluid case numerically . we show that nearly all observed millisecond pulsars are very likely to be in the quasi - equilibrium state . our predicted quasi - equilibrium temperatures for psr j0437 - 4715 are only 20% lower than inferred from observations . accounting for superfluidity should increase the predicted value ." ]
12,082
12,082
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: we begin by recalling two closely related operads . the first is the _ little 2-discs _ operad of boardman and vogt , denoted @xmath0 . the arity @xmath1 space , @xmath2 , is the space of embeddings of the disjoint union of @xmath1 discs into a standard disc , where each disc is embedded by a map which is a translation composed with a dilation . at the level of spaces , group complete algebras over this operad are 2-fold loop spaces , and at the level of homology an algebra over @xmath3 is precisely a gerstenhaber algebra . the second operad is a variant of the little 2-discs ; it is the _ framed little 2-discs _ operad , denoted @xmath4 , first introduced by getzler @xcite . here each little disc is allowed to be embedded by a composition of a _ rotation _ in addition to a dilation and translation , so in particular , @xmath5 . getzler observed that algebras over the homology operad @xmath6 are precisely batalin - vilkovisky algebras , and at the space level the second author and wahl @xcite proved that a group complete algebra over @xmath4 is a 2-fold loop space on a based space with a circle action . tamarkin @xcite first proved that the operad @xmath0 is _ formal _ over @xmath7 , meaning that the singular chain operad @xmath8 is quasi - isomorphic to the homology operad @xmath9 . his proof is algebraic in nature , using braid groups and drinfeld associators . kontsevich @xcite sketched a different proof of this formality theorem over @xmath10 which generalizes to show formality of the little @xmath11-discs for all @xmath12 . roughly speaking , kontsevich works dually , constructing a cooperad of cochain complexes of graphs which maps to both the cochains and the cohomology of @xmath0 by quasi - isomorphisms . the full details of kontsevich s proof have been explained nicely by lambrechts and volic @xcite . the kontsevich proof method has the advantage over tamarkin s proof of simultaneously proving the formality in the sullivan dga sense of the individual spaces of the operad . recently severa and willwacher @xcite have shown that the quasi - isomorphisms of kontsevich and tamarkin are homotopic for a particular choice of drinfeld associator . tamarkin s proof of formality for @xmath0 has been adapted to the operad @xmath4 by severa @xcite , and kontsevich s proof has been adapted to @xmath4 by the present authors in @xcite . both adaptations are relatively straightforward . operad formality theorems have significant applications . the formality of @xmath0 plays an important role in tamarkin s proof @xcite of kontsevich s celebrated deformation quantization theorem , and the formality of @xmath13 for @xmath14 is a primary ingredient in the computation of the homology of spaces of long knots in high dimensions @xcite . formality of the operad @xmath4 is used in @xcite to construct chain level homotopy bv - algebra structures for topological conformal field theories and for the 2-fold loop space on a space with a circle action , as well as to give a particular solution to the cyclic deligne conjecture . unlike @xmath13 , the operad @xmath15 has the additional structure of being homotopy equivalent to a _ cyclic operad _ ( see @xcite for an explicit cyclic model ) ; being a cyclic operad means roughly that the roles of inputs and outputs can be interchanged . the present paper was motivated by the question of whether the formality of the operad can be made compatible with the cyclic structure . we answer this question in the affirmative when @xmath16 . in section [ cyclic - model ] we will recall a cyclic model @xmath17 for @xmath4 constructed in terms of compactified moduli spaces of genus zero curves with marked points . the elements of @xmath17 are genus zero stable curves decorated with real tangent rays at the marked points and nodes . the operad composition is obtained by gluing stable curves at marked points and tensoring the corresponding rays . this model was first introduced by kimura - stasheff - voronov @xcite , and it is closely related to the modular operad of deligne - mumford compactified moduli spaces of curves whose formality is proved in @xcite . moreover @xmath17 is homotopy equivalent , as a cyclic operad , to the operad of genus zero riemann surfaces with boundary , where the operad composition is defined by gluing along boundary components . the main result of this paper is : [ main ] the cyclic operad @xmath18 of singular chains on @xmath17 with real coefficients is quasi - isomorphic as a cyclic operad to its homology , @xmath19 , which is the batalin - vilkovisky operad . the new and important point of this theorem is that the chain of quasi - isomorphisms is compatible with the _ cyclic _ operad structure . a second point , coming out of the proof , is that this operad formality simultaneously realises the formality of the individual spaces of the operad in the sullivan commutative dga sense , as was the case for the kontsevich proof in the unframed case . this cyclic formality has a consequence in computing the cohomology of diffeomorphism groups of 3-dimensional handlebodies , as discussed further below . it is not immediately clear that the previous operad formality proofs given in @xcite and @xcite are compatible with the cyclic structure , nor is it clear that they are compatible with the formality of the individual spaces of the operad . however , since the completion of this work severa has indicated how to show that his formality proof is in fact compatible with the cyclic structure . as for the other proof , the kontsevich graph complex , as modified for the framed 2-discs operad in @xcite , in arity @xmath1 has an action of the enlarged symmetric group @xmath20 ( this action would be part of the cyclic operad structure ) by linear automorphisms , but it is not clear if this action respects the differential . it seems likely that the action is in fact compatible , but proving this appears to be a very difficult combinatorial problem . instead , here we take a more conceptual approach and build a new manifestly cyclic operad of `` projective graph complexes '' as a replacement for kontsevich s graph complexes . the differential is now a combination of both edge deletions and edge contractions . the projective graph complexes do form a cyclic cooperad . our proof of theorem [ main ] then follows in outline the method used by kontsevich in the unframed case . the projective graph complexes map onto the cohomology of @xmath17 , and they also map to the ( semi - algebraic ) forms on @xmath17 by a variation of kontsevich s map defined by certain configuration space integrals . we prove that both of these maps are quasi - isomorphisms and are compatible with the cyclic cooperad structures . the theorem then follows by dualising . for @xmath21 the question of formality of @xmath15 as a cyclic operad , or even just as an ordinary operad , remains open . in future work we hope to address this . in the forthcoming paper @xcite , the first author proves that the modular operad generated by the cyclic operad @xmath17 is homotopy equivalent to the modular operad made from @xmath22s of handlebodies . this leads to a bousfield - kan spectral sequence computing the cohomology of @xmath23 for @xmath24 a handlebody of genus @xmath25 . theorem [ main ] implies that this spectral sequence degenerates at the @xmath26 page . ( note that formality as an operad rather than a cyclic operad is not enough to imply degeneration of the spectral sequence . ) the framed little 2-discs operad @xmath4 is homotopy equivalent to a cyclic operad , ( although it is not itself cyclic on the nose ) . a convenient cyclic model was introduced in @xcite . we recall that model and discuss some of its properties . recall that a _ cyclic operad _ is an extension of the concept of operad in which inputs and outputs are on equal footing ; this can be formalised by asking that the @xmath27 action on the arity @xmath1 space extends to an action of @xmath20 in a way compatible with the operad composition maps . the notion of a cyclic operad was first introduced by getzler and kapranov @xcite . in more detail , a cyclic operad in a symmetric monoidal category @xmath28 is defined by the following data : a functor @xmath29 from the category of non - empty finite sets and bijections to @xmath28 , and for each pair of finite sets @xmath30 with elements @xmath31 a composition morphism , @xmath32 natural in @xmath33 and @xmath34 and satisfying the following axioms . * * ( associativity ) * given finite sets @xmath35 , and elements @xmath36 , the following diagram commutes : @xmath37 * * ( commutativity ) * given finite sets @xmath30 and elements @xmath38 and @xmath39 , the following diagram commutes : @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the canonical bijection @xmath42 . * * ( unit axiom ) * for each set @xmath43 of cardinality 2 there is a morphism @xmath44 , where @xmath45 is the monoidal unit , that is natural in @xmath46 and such that for any finite set @xmath33 and an element @xmath38 the following diagram commutes : @xmath47{p(a\sqcup i \smallsetminus \{a , i\ } ) , } \end{diagram}\ ] ] where @xmath48 is the canonical bijection sending @xmath49 to @xmath50 . dually one defines a _ cyclic cooperad _ by reversing the arrows in the definition . concretely , a cyclic cooperad is specified by the data of a functor @xmath29 from finite sets and bijections to @xmath28 , and a co - composition map @xmath51 ( where @xmath52 and @xmath53 are auxiliary points ) for each partition @xmath54 . these co - composition maps must satisfy dual versions of the naturality , symmetry , and associativity conditions . a cyclic ( co)operad in the category of chain complexes is called a _ differential graded cyclic ( co)operad_. we now recall the moduli space operad introduced by kimura , stasheff and voronov in @xcite . in their notation , the operad is denoted @xmath55 , but we prefer @xmath17 as being more consistent with other notations . this operad is manifestly a cyclic operad , and we will show in proposition [ operad - equivalence ] that its underlying operad is homotopy equivalent to the framed little 2-discs operad . given a non - empty finite set @xmath56 , let @xmath57 denote the moduli space of genus zero riemann surfaces with marked points labelled by @xmath56 . explicitly , @xmath58 where @xmath59 is the space of injective maps from @xmath56 to the complex projective line , and the automorphism group @xmath60 acts on the target in the standard way . we will write @xmath61 when @xmath56 is the set @xmath62 . there is an identification between @xmath61 and the complement in @xmath63 of the union of the hyperplanes of the form @xmath64 if @xmath65 then the moduli space @xmath61 is noncompact and has a deligne - mumford - knudsen compactification @xmath66 which can be constructed blowing up in a suitable order all proper intersections of hyperplanes of the form in @xmath63 @xcite . the points of @xmath67 correspond to stable nodal riemann surfaces , ( _ nodal _ means that the surfaces are allowed to have double - point singularities , and _ stable _ in this case means that no irreducible component is a sphere with strictly fewer than 3 points that are either nodes or marked points ) . for @xmath68 there is a complex line bundle @xmath69 over @xmath67 whose fibre over a given riemann surface @xmath70 is the tangent space at the @xmath71 marked point . the boundary , @xmath72 , is a normal crossing divisor . it has an irreducible component for each unordered partition @xmath73 into two subsets of cardinality at least 2 , and the corresponding component is canonically isomorphic to @xmath74 . the inclusions @xmath75 define a cyclic operad structure on the deligne - mumford - knudsen moduli spaces . the space @xmath76 is defined as the real oriented blowup of the boundary locus of @xmath77 . we pull the complex line bundles @xmath78 back from @xmath77 ( and denote them by the same symbol ) . the space @xmath76 can be interpreted as the moduli space of genus zero stable nodal riemann surfaces with points marked by @xmath56 and equipped with the additional data of a ray in the tensor product of the two tangent spaces at either side of each node . it can be constructed as the iterated _ real oriented _ blowup of @xmath63 along _ all _ intersections of hyperplanes , by blowing up first the proper intersections in the same order as for the deligne - mumford space , and finally the hyperplanes themselves . the space @xmath77 is a compact smooth manifold with _ faces _ ; i.e. it is a manifold with corners , stratified with the interior as the unique codimension 0 stratum and all of the positive codimension strata lying on the boundary , each of which is a transversal intersection of faces ( codimension 1 strata ) . faces correspond to unordered partitions of @xmath56 into two subsets @xmath79 of cardinality at least 2 ; given such a partition , the corresponding face is canonically isomorphic to the unit circle bundle of the exterior tensor product @xmath80 over @xmath81 let @xmath82 denote the ( coarse ) moduli space of genus zero smooth surfaces equipped with points marked by @xmath56 with real tangent rays . explicitly , @xmath83 where @xmath84 is the circle bundle associated with the tangent bundle of @xmath85 . observe that there are diffeomorphisms @xmath86 in particular , @xmath87 is compact for @xmath88 . when @xmath65 , @xmath87 is noncompact . forgetting the tangent rays at the marked points gives a trivial principal @xmath89-bundle @xmath90 which extends uniquely to a trivial torus bundle over @xmath91 . we call its total space @xmath92 . note that the trivialisation of the bundle is not canonical . more explicitly , @xmath93 one sees that @xmath94 is a compactification of @xmath87 obtained by adding boundary and corners , and hence it is homotopy equivalent to its interior . when @xmath88 we simply define @xmath95 . the functor @xmath96 forms a cyclic operad . composition with @xmath97 acts by rotating tangent rays , and composition with @xmath98 removes a marked point . all other composition maps are defined by gluing marked points together to form a node and tensoring their tangent rays to produce the decoration at the node ; in more detail , if @xmath99 and @xmath100 both have cardinality at least 2 then the composition map @xmath101 is a trivial circle bundle over the face associated with the partition @xmath102 and it is induced by the multiplication map @xmath103 . recall that a homotopy equivalence of topological operads is a morphism of operads ( a natural transformation commuting with the composition and unit maps ) that is level - wise an equivariant homotopy equivalence . [ operad - equivalence ] there is homotopy equivalences of operads @xmath104 there is also a homotopy equivalence of spaces , @xmath105 , where the torus acts by rotating all but the zeroth tangent direction . in @xcite the second author constructed a zigzag of homotopy equivalences between the operad @xmath0 and the _ fulton - macpherson operad _ , @xmath106 , introduced by getzler and jones in @xcite . the space @xmath107 is the real oriented fulton - macpherson compactification of the space of configurations of @xmath1 points in @xmath108 modulo dilation and translation . it can be constructed by iterated real oriented blowup from the @xmath109-sphere @xmath110 , where @xmath111 is the thin diagonal defined by @xmath112 and @xmath113 is the affine group generated by positive dilations and translations . the blowups are performed along all diagonals . the space @xmath107 is a manifold with faces ; a face corresponds to an unordered partition of @xmath114 into two subsets of cardinality at least 2 , and it is canonically diffeomorphic to @xmath115 . the inclusion of a face with @xmath116 represents a ( non - cyclic ) @xmath117 operad composition . from @xcite , @xmath0 is an operad in the category of spaces with @xmath118 action and so one can form the semidirect product operad @xmath119 which is isomorphic to @xmath4 . similarly , @xmath106 is an operad in @xmath118-spaces , and one can form the _ framed fulton - macpherson operad _ @xmath120 . the homotopy equivalence between @xmath0 and @xmath106 is realised by a zigzag of @xmath118-equivariant maps and thus induces a homotopy equivalence of operads , @xmath121 it turns out that @xmath122 and @xmath17 are isomorphic as operads . this is immediate in arity @xmath123 in higher arity , note that blowing up the sphere @xmath124 at the diagonal @xmath125 is the same as blowing up @xmath126 at the hypersurfaces @xmath127 . blowing up all other diagonals identifies @xmath128 , and thus we have diffeomorphisms @xmath129 compatible with the operad composition , by definition . for the proof of theorem [ main ] , we will need to work in the category of semi - algebraic spaces . the theory of semi - algebraic spaces and its corresponding de rham theory has been developed by hardt , lambrechts , turchin and volic in @xcite . the functor @xmath96 forms a cyclic operad in the category of semi - algebraic manifolds . sinha constructs in @xcite a @xmath27-equivariant semi - algebraic embedding @xmath130^{\binom{n}{3}}$ ] by evaluating the direction between each pair of points and ratio of distances for each triple of points . thus the symmetric group acts semi - algebraically . moreover , lambrechts and volic check in ( * ? ? ? * prop 5.5 ) that the operad composition @xmath131 is the restriction of a semi - algebraic map . passing to the semi - direct product with @xmath118 , it follows that @xmath122 is an operad in semi - algebraic manifolds . finally , we must verify that the action of @xmath27 on @xmath132 is semi - algebraic . for this it is convenient instead to @xmath27-equivariantly embed @xmath133 by evaluating angles between rays for pair of points and the cross ratio for 4-tuples of points . this shows that @xmath134 acts semi - algebraically on @xmath94 . forgetting subsets of the marked points defines a collection of important projections between the various moduli spaces . given a subset @xmath135 , let @xmath136 be the map induced by forgetting all marked points labelled by @xmath46 . note that @xmath137 is the iterated operad composition with the point of @xmath138 for each element of @xmath46 . the map @xmath139 , forgetting the points in @xmath46 , is a semi - algebraic fibre bundle . the projection @xmath140 is equivalent to the composition @xmath141 . the first map is a semi - algebraic bundle by ( * ? ? ? * appendix a ) , the second map is a trivial bundle , and the composite of bundle projections is a bundle projection by ( * ? ? ? the fibres of the bundle @xmath140 are manifolds with faces , so the fibrewise boundary is stratified into pieces of codimension 1 ( in the total space ) and greater . we shall refer to the codimension 1 strata as the _ fibrewise boundary components_. [ fibrewise - boundary ] for @xmath142 , the fibrewise boundary components of the bundle @xmath143 correspond bijectively with the set of unordered partitions of @xmath56 into two subsets @xmath144 of cardinality at least 2 such that @xmath145 . corresponding to a partition @xmath146 is the closure of the locus in @xmath147 in which a node separates the sphere into two lobes , one containing the points of @xmath148 and the other containing the points of @xmath149 . this closed stratum fibres over @xmath150 if and only if one of the @xmath151 contains at most one point of @xmath152 ( a priori it is an unordered partition , but we can always choose to call the set with this property @xmath148 ) . given a partition @xmath153 as above , we will write @xmath154 for the corresponding fibrewise boundary component of @xmath137 . fibrewise orientations of the canonical projections play an important role in the formality proof in this paper . here we establish some general definitions and conventions for working with orientations . given a finite dimensional real vector space @xmath155 , let @xmath156 denote the top exterior power of @xmath155 ; a choice of a ray in this line is equivalent to a choice of an orientation of @xmath155 . if @xmath70 is a finite set then we write @xmath157 ( and @xmath158 when @xmath70 is empty ) . if @xmath70 has cardinality at least 2 then choosing a ray in @xmath159 is equivalent to choosing an ordering of @xmath70 up to even permutation . an orientation form on an @xmath1-dimensional manifold @xmath160 is a nowhere vanishing @xmath1-form @xmath161 . clearly an orientation form determines an orientation of @xmath160 , and two orientation forms determine the same orientation if and only if they agree up to multiplication by a positive scalar function . given a fibre bundle @xmath162 , a fibrewise orientation form is a form on @xmath163 whose restriction to each fibre is an orientation form . we will use the following general orientation conventions . * given @xmath164 , we define an isomorphism @xmath165 by the rule @xmath166 ( inverse to the map @xmath167 ) . * if @xmath160 is a manifold with boundary with orientation form @xmath161 and @xmath168 is an outward pointing normal vector field on @xmath169 , then @xmath169 is given the induced orientation @xmath170 . thus the stokes formula is @xmath171 . * if @xmath172 and @xmath173 are fibre bundles with fibrewise orientation forms @xmath174 and @xmath175 respectively , then we give the the composite bundle @xmath176 the fibrewise orientation form @xmath177 . given a finite set @xmath56 and an element @xmath178 , the canonical projection @xmath179 has a standard fibrewise orientation defined as follows . it factors as @xmath180 where @xmath181 forgets the tangent ray decoration at the marked point @xmath182 , and @xmath183 forgets the position of @xmath182 , thus forgetting it entirely . the principal @xmath184-bundle @xmath181 inherits a fibrewise orientation @xmath185 from the counterclockwise orientation of the circle . the map @xmath183 is a family of riemann surfaces and so the complex structures of the fibres determine a fibrewise orientation @xmath186 . using the above orientation conventions , we then give @xmath187 the fibrewise orientation determined by the form @xmath188 . given @xmath189 , we define a bijection between rays in @xmath190 and fibrewise orientations of @xmath191 as follows . the ray spanned by @xmath192 ( where @xmath193 are the elements of @xmath46 ) corresponds to the fibrewise orientation determined by the above conventions and the factorisation @xmath194 . we will first recall arnold s well - known presentation of the cohomology of the ordered configuration spaces of @xmath108 , or equivalently of the spaces of the unframed little discs operad @xmath0 . then we will use this result to give a new presentation of the cohomology of the framed little discs operad which will be convenient for working with the cyclic operad structure . consider the little @xmath195-discs operad @xmath0 . for @xmath196 , consider the map @xmath197 which forgets all but the @xmath71 and @xmath198 discs . define a collection of 1-forms @xmath199 where @xmath200 is the standard volume form of @xmath184 . ( we will often abuse notation by using the same symbol for both a differential form and the cohomology class it represents . ) ( arnold)[arnold - pres ] the real cohomology of @xmath2 is generated by the degree 1 classes @xmath201 for @xmath202 , subject to only to the symmetry relation , @xmath203 and the arnold relation , @xmath204 for each triple of distinct indices @xmath205 . in fact , this gives a presentation of the integral cohomology , but we shall only be concerned with real cohomology in this paper . since @xmath206 , where the @xmath71 @xmath184 factor measures the angle by which the @xmath71 disc is rotated , one has @xmath207 where @xmath208 is the class represented by the volume form @xmath209 of the @xmath49-th circle . thus the cohomology is generated by the classes @xmath201 together with the classes @xmath208 , and subject only to the symmetry and arnold relations . the symmetric group @xmath20 acts on @xmath210 by permuting the labels of the marked points . the subgroup @xmath211 , consisting of permutations which fix 0 , permutes the generators and relations among themselves in the obvious way . however , the permutations which do not fix zero act in a more complicated way . we will now give a different presentation in which the generators and relations of @xmath212 are both permuted by the full symmetric group @xmath20 . let @xmath213 the projection forgetting all but the @xmath49-th and the @xmath214-th points with their tangent rays ( see earlier section [ canonical - projections ] ) . since @xmath97 , we define closed 1-forms @xmath215 which represent generators of the cohomology . to describe the relations among these generators we must relate them to the generators @xmath201 , @xmath208 described above . there are two ways of identifying the space @xmath216 with @xmath217 . the first way is to apply the unique conformal automorphism of @xmath218 which puts the marked points @xmath219 labelled by @xmath220 at the points @xmath221 respectively . one then reads off the angle @xmath222 , in the counter - clockwise sense , from the equator ( going in the direction from @xmath223 to @xmath224 to @xmath225 ) to the tangent ray at the @xmath49 marked point . in terms of these coordinates , @xmath226 . the other way of identifying @xmath227 with @xmath217 is to put the points at @xmath228 and then rotate the sphere around the axis through @xmath223 and @xmath225 , so that the tangent ray of the point at @xmath225 is parallel to the equator ( pointing in the direction from @xmath225 to @xmath223 to @xmath224 ) . we define @xmath229 to be the angle between the ray at @xmath223 and the equator . parallel transport along the geodesic from @xmath230 to @xmath231 of the tangent ray to the equator at @xmath230 gives a reference ray at @xmath231 and @xmath232 is the angle from this ray to the tangent ray of @xmath231 . the angle @xmath233 is measured at @xmath230 from the equator to the geodesic from @xmath230 and @xmath231 . in terms of these coordinates , @xmath234 and @xmath235 . these two different coordinate systems are illustrated below . one easily sees that these two coordinate systems are related as follows : @xmath236 hence , in the cohomology of @xmath94 the two sets of generators are related by : @xmath237 in terms of the @xmath238 classes , the arnold relation becomes : @xmath239 the action of the symmetric group must send relations to relations , so one can write the relations in a more invariant form . let @xmath240 be four distinct elements of @xmath241 . cyclic arnold relations _ are @xmath242 where @xmath243 is the alternating group on 4 letters . clearly the symmetric group @xmath20 sends each relation of this type to another relation of this type . [ cyclic - pres ] the real cohomology of @xmath210 is generated by the 1-dimensional classes @xmath244 ( @xmath245 ) subject only to the cyclic arnold relations , one for each 4-tuple of distinct indices @xmath240 between @xmath223 and @xmath1 , and to the symmetry relation @xmath246 . the main ingredient in kontsevich s proof of formality of the unframed little discs operad is the construction of a certain differential graded algebra of graphs , the _ kontsevich graph complex _ @xmath247 , which resolves the usual arnold presentation ( theorem [ arnold - pres ] ) of the cohomology of the little discs @xmath2 . as @xmath1 varies these dgas of graphs fit together to form a cooperad , and the dual operad is quasi - isomorphic to the operad of chains on the little discs . tensoring kontsevich s resolution @xmath247 of @xmath248 with @xmath249 gives a resolution of the presentation of the cohomology ring of @xmath250 we shall refer to this dga as the _ affine graph complex _ , denoted @xmath251 . the collection of dgas @xmath252 forms a cooperad , but it is _ not _ compatible with the _ cyclic _ operad structure of @xmath17 . to deal with this we will pass to the _ projective graph complex _ @xmath253 . the projective graph complexes do form a cyclic cooperad and we prove that @xmath253 is indeed a resolution of @xmath212 by a comparison with @xmath251 . summarising this : * @xmath247 is kontsevich s graph complex ; it resolves @xmath248 over @xmath254 $ ] . * @xmath255 is the affine graph complex ; it resolves @xmath212 over @xmath254 $ ] . * @xmath253 is the projective graph complex , which resolves @xmath212 over @xmath256 $ ] . each of these complexes will be defined in detail below . by a graph @xmath257 we shall mean a finite set @xmath258 of vertices and a set @xmath163 of unordered pairs of vertices representing the edges . note that our graphs can not have loops or double edges . those vertices in @xmath259 are called _ internal vertices _ , and those in @xmath56 are called _ external vertices _ ; there is an induced partition of the set of edges @xmath260 where the set of _ internal edges _ , @xmath261 , consists of those edges for which both endpoints are internal , the set of _ external edges _ , @xmath262 , consists of those for which both endpoints are external vertices , and the set of boundary edges , @xmath263 , consists of those which have one internal endpoint and one external endpoint . an _ affine orientation _ of a graph @xmath264 is a choice of a ray in the real line @xmath265 . a _ projective orientation _ of @xmath266 is a choice of a ray in @xmath267 . if @xmath266 is equipped with an affine or projective orientation then we shall write @xmath268 for the same underlying graph equipped with the opposite orientation . given a graph @xmath269 and an edge @xmath270 , we define a new graph @xmath271 by deleting the edge @xmath270 . if @xmath266 has a projective or affine orientation , then @xmath272 inherits an orientation of the same type by the isomorphism @xmath273 from section [ orientations ] . given a graph @xmath269 and an edge @xmath270 that is not part of a triangle of edges and has at least one internal endpoint , let @xmath274 denote the graph constructed from @xmath266 by contracting the edge @xmath270 , i.e. deleting @xmath270 from the set of edges and identifying its two endpoints together . if @xmath270 is a boundary edge then the resulting vertex is external ; if @xmath275 then the resulting vertex is internal . thus the set of external vertices of @xmath274 is identified with @xmath56 . if @xmath266 has an affine orientation then @xmath274 inherits an affine orientation by the isomorphism @xmath273 . inducing projective orientations is slightly more complicated and depends on whether @xmath270 is boundary , or internal . * if @xmath276 then one endpoint , @xmath182 , is external and one endpoint , @xmath277 , is internal . in this case there is a canonical identification of the edges of @xmath274 with @xmath278 ; we identify the external vertices of @xmath274 with @xmath56 , and the internal vertices with @xmath279 , by identifying the vertex in @xmath274 at which @xmath270 was contracted with @xmath182 . using these identifications , the induced projective orientation of @xmath274 is the image of the projective orientation of @xmath266 under the isomorphism @xmath280 . * if @xmath275 then inducing a projective orientation on @xmath274 is equivalent to choosing an orientation of @xmath270 , meaning a choice of one end , @xmath277 , as _ head _ and the other , @xmath182 as _ tail_. as in the boundary edge case , we contract @xmath270 onto its tail and identify the internal vertices of @xmath274 with @xmath281 , and then we induce a projective orientation via @xmath280 . suppose that @xmath282 is a pair of edges in a graph @xmath266 meeting at an internal vertex @xmath182 and such that @xmath270 is not a side of a triangle in @xmath283 . then we shall write @xmath284 if @xmath266 has a projective orientation and @xmath270 is either a boundary edge or an oriented internal edge , then @xmath285 inherits a projective orientation by the above discussion . first recall kontsevich s complex of `` admissible graphs '' ( * ? ? ? * definition 13 ) , denoted @xmath286 . the vector space @xmath287 is spanned by isomorphism classes of affine oriented graphs with external vertex set @xmath56 modulo the relations 1 . @xmath288 if there is a connected component of @xmath266 containing no external vertices , 2 . @xmath288 if there is an internal vertex of valence @xmath289 , 3 . @xmath290 . there is a grading defined by @xmath291 . the differential of degree 1 is given by the formula @xmath292 where @xmath270 runs among those boundary and internal edges such that @xmath274 is defined . there is an associative and graded commutative product defined by gluing the external vertices together according to the labelling , and by tensoring orientation rays . note that the differential is a derivation of the product , and so @xmath287 forms a commutative dga . we will write @xmath293 when @xmath294 . [ agc ] the affine graph complex is the cdga defined as @xmath295 we now come to principal object of this paper : the cdga of _ projective graphs_. [ defproj ] the vector space of projective graphs @xmath296 , for a finite set @xmath56 , is spanned by isomorphism classes of projectively oriented graphs @xmath266 with @xmath56 as set of external vertices , modulo the relations * if @xmath266 has an internal vertex of valence @xmath297 then @xmath288 , * if @xmath266 has a component with at most one external vertex and at least one internal vertex then @xmath288 , * @xmath290 , * the `` pinwheel relation '' : for @xmath277 an internal vertex of @xmath266 and @xmath298 the set of edges incident at @xmath277 , @xmath299 there is a grading defined by @xmath300 . there is an associative and graded commutative algebra structure on @xmath296 given by gluing at the external vertices , and tensoring orientation rays . in the case @xmath301 , we write @xmath302 . we next define a differential @xmath303 on @xmath296 . the formula will involve choices , but we will show that because of the pinwheel relation it is in fact independent of these choices . to define @xmath304 , with @xmath305 , we first arbitrarily choose an orientation of each internal edge @xmath270 of @xmath266 . we orient the boundary edges in each case so that their heads are at their internal endpoints . the differential is now given by the formula @xmath306 where the sum runs over all ordered pairs of edges @xmath282 for which the head of @xmath270 is internal and incident to @xmath307 ( so in particular , they must lie in @xmath308 ) and such that @xmath309 is defined ( i.e. deleting @xmath307 and contracting @xmath270 does not result in a loop or double - edge ) . @xmath310 is well - defined , independent of the choices of orientations for the edges between internal vertices . suppose @xmath270 is an edge between internal vertices @xmath277 , @xmath311 . the difference between @xmath310 with @xmath270 oriented one way or the other is precisely the pinwheel relation in @xmath274 at the vertex where @xmath270 is contracted . thus @xmath310 is independent of the choices of orienting the internal edges . it remains to check that @xmath303 descends to the quotient by the pinwheel relation . given a graph @xmath266 with an internal vertex @xmath277 , orient all of the ( internal ) edges of @xmath298 with their heads at @xmath277 . then , @xmath312 the first of the two above summations can be grouped as a sum of terms , each of which is a pinwheel sum over edges @xmath25 incident at @xmath277 in @xmath285 . the terms of the second summation cancel in pairs since @xmath313 oriented with head at @xmath277 means that @xmath314 , and @xmath315 . @xmath316 . to compute @xmath317 we first choose an orientation of each internal edge of @xmath266 ; @xmath310 is a sum of terms of the form @xmath318 and the internal edges of each of these terms inherit orientations . now , @xmath317 is a sum of graphs of the form @xmath319 ( the sign depends only on @xmath266 ) , where @xmath320 are internal or boundary edges in @xmath266 with @xmath307 incident at the head of @xmath270 , and @xmath321 are internal or boundary edges in @xmath318 with @xmath322 incident at the head of @xmath323 . this means that , as edges in @xmath266 , the possible configurations are enumerated as follows : type ( 0 ) : the head of @xmath323 is incident at @xmath322 in @xmath266 and the heads of @xmath270 and @xmath323 are disjoint . if the head of @xmath323 is incident at @xmath322 in @xmath266 but the configuration is not of type ( 0 ) then it must be type ( 1 ) : @xmath307 , @xmath322 , @xmath270 and @xmath323 all meet at a vertex . if the head of @xmath323 is not incident at @xmath322 in @xmath266 then it must be incident at @xmath322 in @xmath285 . this can happen only if , in @xmath266 , either @xmath323 and @xmath322 are incident at opposite ends of @xmath270 ( types ( 2 ) , ( 4 ) , and ( 5 ) below ) , or if @xmath322 is incident at the tail of @xmath323 and contracting @xmath270 causes @xmath323 to reverse orientation ( type ( 3 ) below ) . so the configuration must be one of the following types . we will show case by case that all terms can be grouped to exactly cancel . for type ( 0 ) , the way that orientations are induced yields @xmath324 and so these two terms in @xmath325 cancel . for types ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) , @xmath326 cancels with @xmath327 . in the configuration of type ( 3 ) , @xmath328 cancels with @xmath329 which is a term of type ( 4 ) , and hence the terms of type ( 3 ) cancel in pairs with the terms of type ( 4 ) . type ( 5 ) is slightly more involved . by the pinwheel relation , @xmath330 consider the sum of the expression over all @xmath331 ; the sum over @xmath332 is zero because of the symmetry of swapping @xmath307 and @xmath25 ( just as for type ( 0 ) ) , and the sum over @xmath333 exactly cancels with the sum over @xmath333 of the type ( 5 ) terms @xmath334 occurring in @xmath325 . here we introduce maps of graph complexes that are combinatorial analogues of certain configuration space integrals . fix finite sets @xmath335 . let @xmath336 denote the subalgebra of graphs having no internal vertices . note that for such a graph @xmath337 , a projective orientation is simply a ray in @xmath265 . given a ray @xmath338 , there is a linear map @xmath339 it is defined by turning the @xmath259 vertices into internal vertices and mapping the orientations by @xmath340 note that @xmath341 geometrically , this map corresponds to integrating out the @xmath259 vertices as we shall see in section [ int - section ] . a general projectively oriented graph @xmath305 with set of internal vertices @xmath259 can be written as @xmath342 , where @xmath343 and @xmath344 is a ray in @xmath345 . we now define a cyclic cooperad structure on the collection of projective graph complexes . for any partition @xmath346 we need to define a co - composition map @xmath347 let @xmath348 be the graph consisting of a single edge between external vertices @xmath349 and @xmath50 , oriented from @xmath349 to @xmath50 . then , @xmath350 a graph @xmath351 can be written as a product of graphs each having only a single edge . the order of the factors corresponds to the chosen orientation . the multiplication of the formulae above for the edges of @xmath266 defines @xmath352 . given a partition @xmath353 , choose rays @xmath354 and @xmath355 such that @xmath356 . now consider the composition @xmath357 we can now define the cooperad co - composition map on an arbitrary graph @xmath358 by the formula @xmath359 there is a useful alternative description of this co - composition that will make the verification of certain properties easier . an @xmath360-_splitting _ of a graph @xmath266 is a partition of the vertices into two sets @xmath361 with @xmath362 and @xmath363 and a partition of the edges into two sets @xmath364 such that if both of the endpoints of an edge @xmath270 are in @xmath365 ( @xmath366 ) then @xmath367 . given a splitting @xmath41 , we can construct two new graphs @xmath368 with vertices @xmath369 and edges @xmath370 ; if @xmath367 , as an edge in @xmath266 , has only one endpoint in @xmath365 then as an edge in @xmath371 it s endpoint that is not in @xmath365 is replaced by the auxiliary vertex @xmath372 . if @xmath266 has a projective orientation @xmath373 then we give @xmath374 and @xmath375 projective orientations @xmath376 and @xmath377 such that @xmath378 . by inspection one finds the following . the co - composition map defined above in is given by the formula @xmath379 where the sum runs over the set @xmath380 of all @xmath360-splittings of @xmath266 . the co - composition maps given above are well - defined and they make @xmath296 into a cyclic cooperad in the category of commutative differential graded algebras . there are three facts to verify . * @xmath381 is compatible with the relations @xmath382 of definition [ defproj ] . * @xmath381 commutes with the differential . * these maps satisfy the cyclic cooperad axioms given in section [ cyclic - operad - definitions ] . for ( i ) , it is easy to verify compatibility with @xmath383 . for the pinwheel relation @xmath384 , suppose @xmath266 is a projective graph with an internal vertex @xmath277 and external vertices @xmath385 . then @xmath386 where @xmath41 runs over the set @xmath387 of @xmath360-splittings of @xmath388 . then can be written as @xmath389 this verifies statement ( i ) . we turn to ( ii ) now . given an oriented edge @xmath270 , let @xmath390 denote the head and @xmath391 the tail . observe that choosing a splitting of @xmath318 is the same as choosing a splitting of @xmath266 such that @xmath392 are either all on the left or all on the right . hence , @xmath393 applying the differential to a co - composition and expanding similarly , one sees that @xmath394 is given by the above sum but without the requirement @xmath391 be on the same side as @xmath390 . we will show that these additional terms cancel out . suppose we are given a pair @xmath282 in @xmath266 meeting at an internal vertex @xmath395 and a splitting @xmath396 such that @xmath397 , @xmath398 , and @xmath399 . define a new splitting @xmath400 by switching @xmath320 and @xmath390 from the right to the left . then @xmath401 and so these two terms exactly cancel . all of the additional terms in @xmath402 can thus be paired in this way to cancel . finally , the verification of ( iii ) is entirely straightforward . kontsevich showed that the map @xmath405 , defined by sending a graph with no internal vertices to the corresponding product of arnold classes @xmath201 , one for each edge @xmath406 , and sending all graphs with internal vertices to zero , is a quasi - isomorphism of cooperads ; see ( * ? ? ? * section 3.3.4 ) or ( * ? ? ? * theorem 9.1 ) . it follows immediately that the analogous map @xmath407 is also a quasi - isomorphism of cooperads . the cohomology @xmath408 is a cyclic cooperad , but @xmath409 is _ not _ a cyclic cooperad . hence we must pass from affine to projective graphs . [ projective - graphs - resolution ] the map @xmath410 defined by sending @xmath266 to zero if it has any internal vertices , and otherwise sending it to the corresponding product of @xmath244 classes , one for each edge @xmath411 , is a quasi - isomorphism of cyclic cooperads . we will derive this theorem from the corresponding statement for @xmath412 by a spectral sequence comparison of @xmath412 and @xmath403 . the first step is to construct a map between @xmath412 and @xmath403 , and for this we must introduce a couple of auxiliary graded vector spaces . let @xmath413 denote the graded vector space covering @xmath412 in which each graph is equipped with an injective map from the set of its internal vertices to @xmath414 . let @xmath415 denote the graded vector space covering @xmath403 in which the pinwheel relation is _ not _ imposed and each graph is equipped with an injective map from the set of its internal vertices to @xmath414 . there is an injective linear map @xmath416 defined by sending @xmath417 to the graph constructed by adding a disjoint external vertex @xmath223 , denoted @xmath418 , and then successively adding an external edge @xmath419 between @xmath418 and the external vertex labelled by @xmath420 for @xmath421 , and then finally by adding a boundary edge @xmath422 from @xmath418 to each internal vertex @xmath277 . the affine orientation @xmath52 of @xmath266 determines a projective orientation of @xmath423 by the expression @xmath424 where @xmath277 runs over the internal vertices in some arbitrary order . the image of @xmath425 is precisely the vector space spanned by graphs for which each internal vertex is connected to @xmath418 by an edge . one checks that @xmath425 descends to a linear map @xmath426 this is a morphism of graded algebras , but it does _ not _ commute with the differentials . however , we have the following . [ linear - iso ] the map @xmath427 is a linear isomorphism . the idea of the proof of the above lemma is to explicitly construct an inverse to @xmath233 by using the pinwheel relation to rewrite any projective graph as a sum of projective graphs in which each internal vertex is connected by an edge to the external vertex @xmath418 . we now formalise this procedure . for any @xmath428 , we define two linear operators @xmath429 by specifying what they do on generators . given a projective graph @xmath430 , if there is no internal vertex labelled by @xmath11 then @xmath431 ; if there is such an internal vertex then @xmath432 simply adds an edge @xmath270 from that vertex to @xmath418 or outputs zero if there is already such an edge ; the new projective orientation is given by @xmath433 . observe that the operators @xmath432 anticommute . let @xmath434 denote the set of edges in @xmath266 which are incident at the internal vertex with label @xmath11 , where @xmath435 if there is no such vertex . if @xmath434 contains an edge to the external vertex @xmath418 then @xmath436 ; otherwise @xmath437 one can think of @xmath438 as using the pinwheel relation to write @xmath266 as a sum of graphs that are in the image of @xmath233 , although we have not yet passed from @xmath439 to @xmath440 . we can now proceed to define an inverse to @xmath233 . consider the infinite composition @xmath441 since any graph @xmath266 has only finitely many internal vertices , all but finitely many of the @xmath438 act by identity on @xmath266 , and so this is well defined . [ p - ops ] * @xmath442 is equivariant with respect to the action of the group @xmath443 of permutations of @xmath414 by relabelling the internal vertices . * @xmath266 and @xmath444 project to the same element of @xmath403 . * any two operators @xmath445 commute . * the pinwheel ideal is contained in the kernel of @xmath442 . part ( i ) is trivial . part ( ii ) is immediate from the pinwheel relation . for part ( iii ) we need only consider the case where @xmath266 is a graph with internal vertices @xmath214 and @xmath11 , neither of which has an edge to @xmath418 since in all other cases at least one of @xmath446 or @xmath438 acts by identity on @xmath266 . in this situation , @xmath447 the operations of deleting edges @xmath270 and @xmath307 anticommute , deleting either @xmath270 or @xmath307 anticommutes with @xmath448 and @xmath432 , and @xmath448 and @xmath432 anticommute with one another . hence @xmath449 we turn to part ( iv ) . it suffices to check that for any graph @xmath266 with internal vertex @xmath11 , @xmath450 since the operators @xmath438 all commute , we need only show that @xmath438 sends @xmath451 to zero . first suppose that there is no edge in @xmath266 between the vertices @xmath11 and @xmath418 . then @xmath452 and this is zero since the @xmath282 term cancels exactly with the @xmath453 term . now suppose that there is an edge @xmath454 in @xmath266 between the internal vertex labelled @xmath11 and the external vertex @xmath418 . then @xmath455 since @xmath456 so all terms cancel . observe that @xmath457 lies in the image of @xmath425 . since @xmath425 is injective we can thus regard @xmath442 as a linear map @xmath458 which clearly satisfies @xmath459 and , by lemma [ p - ops ] , descends to a map @xmath460 such that @xmath461 . on the other hand , lemma [ p - ops ] implies that @xmath442 descends to the identity on @xmath403 . but the induced map on @xmath403 is equal to @xmath462 . therefore @xmath233 is bijective . the complex @xmath403 has a descending filtration @xmath463 in which the @xmath11-th filtration level , @xmath464 , is the subcomplex spanned by projective graphs having at least @xmath11 edges connecting @xmath418 to other external vertices . the filtration is well defined because the pinwheel relation does not affect edges between external vertices , and similarly , the differential is compatible with the filtration . there is a spectral sequence @xmath465 associated with this filtration . [ iso ] the map @xmath233 induces an isomorphism of complexes @xmath466 . let us filter @xmath467 so that @xmath468 is spanned by elements @xmath469 where @xmath470 is a product of at least @xmath11 distinct generators @xmath208 . the linear isomorphism @xmath427 respects the filtrations . we show that if @xmath471 then @xmath472 where the error term , @xmath473 , is in strictly higher filtration , i.e. @xmath474 . this will prove the lemma . recall that @xmath475 has an edge from the external vertex @xmath418 to each internal vertex @xmath277 ; let @xmath422 denote this edge . the differential of @xmath476 is a sum of terms of the form @xmath477 we now consider the various possible positions of the pair of adjacent edges @xmath282 in @xmath476 . case 1 : @xmath270 is an internal edge from @xmath478 to @xmath479 . if @xmath307 connects @xmath479 to the external vertex @xmath418 , then @xmath480 . to see that the orientations agree , suppose @xmath266 has affine orientation @xmath52 . then @xmath475 has projective orientation @xmath481 where @xmath482 here stands for a wedge product of the boundary edges incident at @xmath418 corresponding to the class @xmath470 , and @xmath477 has projective orientation @xmath483 which is precisely the projective orientation of @xmath484 . if @xmath307 connects @xmath479 to a vertex that is not @xmath418 then @xmath485 because this graph has a double edge coming from the edges @xmath486 and @xmath487 in @xmath488 . case 2 : @xmath270 goes from an external vertex @xmath489 to an internal vertex @xmath277 . if @xmath490 is the edge from @xmath418 to @xmath277 , then @xmath491 as in case 1 . the remaining possibilities for the position of @xmath307 will contribute only to the error term @xmath473 . if @xmath492 then @xmath493 is in strictly higher filtration because it has an additional external edge between @xmath52 and @xmath418 . case 3 : @xmath270 goes from @xmath418 to an internal vertex @xmath277 . the internal vertices are at least 4-valent , so there are at least 3 edges connecting @xmath277 to vertices @xmath494 other than @xmath418 . we may assume that @xmath307 is not the edge from @xmath277 to @xmath349 . if @xmath349 is internal then @xmath495 because it has a double edge coming from the edges from @xmath349 to @xmath277 and from @xmath349 to @xmath418 in @xmath475 . if @xmath349 is external then @xmath496 has one more edge than @xmath475 connecting @xmath349 to @xmath418 and thus lives in higher filtration . by lemma [ iso ] the @xmath497-term is @xmath498 . on the other hand by definition of the affine graph complex ( definition [ agc ] ) , and since kontsevich s graph complex @xmath499 is a resolution of @xmath500 , @xmath501 we claim that the spectral sequence collapses at the @xmath497-term . the projection @xmath502 is surjective in cohomology because the forms @xmath244 generate the cohomology ring of @xmath94 and @xmath244 is the image of the graph with a single edge between external vertices labelled @xmath49 and @xmath214 . thus the dimension of @xmath503 is not smaller than the dimension @xmath404 . the isomorphism @xmath504 and finite dimensionality imply that @xmath505 and @xmath506 is an isomorphism of cyclic cooperads . in this section we construct a quasi - isomorphism @xmath507 where @xmath508 is the complex of `` piecewise semi - algebraic forms '' . the idea is as follows . a graph @xmath264 determines a differential form on @xmath509 given by multiplying @xmath244 1-forms corresponding to the edges , and one then integrates this form along the fibres of the bundle @xmath510 to obtain a form on @xmath147 . both the integrand and the integration map have a sign ambiguity , but if @xmath266 has a projective orientation then these sign ambiguities are resolved . the differential form that results is generally _ not _ smooth , and so we must pass to the semi - algebraic setting in which the kontsevich integral is well - defined . given a semi - algebraic manifold , the complex of _ minimal _ forms , @xmath511 , is spanned by elements @xmath512 where the @xmath513 are semi - algebraic functions . the complex of @xmath514 forms , @xmath515 , consists of those forms which can be written as a pushforward of a minimal form . when @xmath168 is smooth , the commutative differential graded algebra of @xmath514 forms is quasi - isomorphic to the ordinary smooth forms . we first recall some facts about semi - algebraic fibrewise integration . suppose @xmath516 is a semi - algebraic fibre bundle with @xmath1-dimensional compact fibres and equipped with a fibrewise orientation . integration of forms fibrewise defines a map ( see ( * ? ? ? * section 8) ) @xmath517 in particular , if @xmath518 restricts to a volume form on each fibre then @xmath519 is the semi - algebraic function on @xmath520 which sends @xmath521 to the volume of the fibre over @xmath50 . we shall need _ iterated _ fibrewise integrals at several points in this section . as the theory is developed in @xcite , the pushforward of a minimal form is a @xmath514 form by definition , and the pushforward of a @xmath514 form is not defined . note that the minimal forms constitute a sub - cdga of all @xmath514 forms . [ twosteps ] if @xmath522 and @xmath523 are semi - algebraic bundles with compact oriented fibres , and @xmath524 is a minimal form on @xmath163 such that @xmath525 is a minimal form on @xmath520 , then @xmath526 is defined and @xmath527 this is a slight generalisation of ( * ? ? ? * prop 8.11 ) and has a similar proof . given any form @xmath528 , one has the push - pull formula ( ( * ? ? ? * prop . 8.13 ) ) , @xmath529 now recall the fibrewise stokes formula . 8.10 ) [ stokes ] let @xmath516 be a semi - algebraic bundle of oriented @xmath11-manifolds with boundary , with @xmath530 denoting the associated fibrewise boundary bundle . then , giving the boundary the induced orientation , @xmath531 for any form @xmath532 . we first define @xmath533 on the subcomplex @xmath534 of graphs with no internal vertices . let @xmath535 be such a graph with edge set @xmath163 and orientation ray in @xmath265 spanned by @xmath536 . an edge @xmath270 between vertices @xmath182 and @xmath277 determines a semi - algebraic minimal 1-form @xmath537 where @xmath538 forgets all marked points except @xmath182 and @xmath277 . define @xmath539 recall that ( the equivalence class of ) a projectively oriented graph @xmath266 with internal vertex set @xmath259 and external vertex set @xmath56 can be written as @xmath540 for some ray @xmath338 and graph @xmath541 . we then define @xmath542 where the fibrewise orientation of @xmath543 is determined by the ray @xmath344 as described in section [ orientations ] . we prove in lemma [ kont - integral - properties ] below that @xmath533 respects the relations @xmath382 of definition [ defproj ] , and hence it descends to a map from @xmath296 , that we denote by the same name . [ kont - integral - properties ] the kontsevich integral satisfies * @xmath544 . * @xmath533 vanishes on graphs having an internal vertex of valence @xmath297 . * @xmath533 vanishes on graphs which have a connected component containing at most one vertex in @xmath56 and at least one internal vertex . * the pinwheel ideal is contained in the kernel of @xmath533 . hence we have a well - defined morphism @xmath545 of graded algebras . statement ( i ) is trivial . for ( ii ) , suppose @xmath266 has a trivalent internal vertex @xmath52 adjacent to vertices @xmath182 , @xmath277 and @xmath311 as below . by proposition [ twosteps ] one may integrate out the internal vertices by first integrating out @xmath52 and then integrating out the remaining internal vertices , i.e. @xmath546 where if @xmath547 has fibrewise orientation @xmath548 then @xmath549 has fibrewise orientation @xmath550 and @xmath551 has its standard fibrewise orientation . this works because the integrand @xmath552 is the product of @xmath553 with a minimal form @xmath554 that is independent of @xmath52 , so by formula , @xmath555 is equal to the product of @xmath554 with the @xmath514 form @xmath556 and since the fibres of @xmath557 have dimension 3 , is a semi - algebraic function on @xmath558 , and so @xmath555 is minimal . putting @xmath182 , @xmath277 and @xmath311 at @xmath223 , @xmath224 and @xmath225 identifies each fibre with the complement of a codimension 1 semi - algebraic subset of the unit tangent circle bundle of the riemann sphere punctured at @xmath223 , @xmath224 and @xmath225 , @xmath559 , and the differential form @xmath553 extends to @xmath559 . complex conjugation is an orientation - preserving diffeomorphism of the tangent circle bundle , and it reverses the sign of @xmath560 since it reverses the sign of each of the three factors . hence the integral over each fibre is zero , and the fibrewise integral is identically zero . statement ( iii ) follows from kontsevich s lemma on vanishing of integrals over configuration spaces ( * ? ? ? * lemma 6.4 ) . we choose an external vertex as the point at infinity , and write a form @xmath552 as polynomial in the forms @xmath201 and @xmath561 . integrate out the internal vertices by first integrating out the tangent ray decorations at the internal vertices , resulting in a @xmath514 and in fact minimal form on a configuration space ; what remains is a configuration space integral of the form that kontsevich s lemma refers to . for ( iv ) we will in show that if @xmath277 is an internal vertex then integrating out the tangent ray decoration at @xmath277 sends the element @xmath562 to zero . write the orientation of @xmath563 as @xmath564 where @xmath565 is the set of edges incident at @xmath277 . let @xmath566 denote the opposite endpoint of @xmath567 . then @xmath568 and integrating out the decoration at @xmath277 extracts the coefficient of @xmath569 . it is not hard to see that the coefficient of @xmath569 is in fact zero . here we shall prove the following . [ differential - of - graph ] the linear map @xmath545 commutes with the differentials and is thus a morphism of differential graded algebras let @xmath305 be a projectively oriented graph . we will prove this theorem by using the stokes formula to compute the exterior derivative of the pa form @xmath570 . write @xmath571 . by the fibrewise stokes formula ( theorem [ stokes ] ) , @xmath572 since @xmath552 is closed . we can factor @xmath573 into the composition of first forgetting the points in @xmath574 and then forgetting the remaining internal vertices : @xmath575 by lemma [ fibrewise - boundary ] , the fibrewise boundary component @xmath576 is the ( closure of the ) locus where a node separates the sphere into two lobes @xmath577 , with the points labelled by @xmath151 on the lobe @xmath578 . the map @xmath579 forgets the first lobe if @xmath580 , and collapses it to a single marked point if @xmath148 contains an external vertex ; hence it is a semi - algebraic fibre bundle , and in fact it is trivial . if @xmath581 then the corresponding term in the stokes formula vanishes : @xmath582 consider performing the fibrewise integration by first integrating along the fibres of @xmath583 and then integrating out the remaining internal vertices . furthermore , consider performing the integral over the fibres of @xmath584 by first integrating out the tangent ray decorations of the points in @xmath574 and then integrating out the positions of these points : @xmath585 since iterated integration of @xmath514 forms is not defined in general , we must justify as above both of these iterated integrations . we will see that each successive integration results again in a minimal form , so the iteration is allowed . relative to a choice of a point @xmath586 as point at infinity , the form @xmath552 can be expanded in terms of the affine presentation generators as in the proof of lemma [ kont - integral - properties ] ( iii),(iv ) . integrating out the @xmath587 decorations then yields a polynomial @xmath588 in @xmath201 forms and @xmath561 forms for @xmath589 , and hence a minimal form . on the locus @xmath576 , let @xmath590 denote the node between the two lobes . on this locus , if @xmath591 and @xmath592 then @xmath593 . hence each monomial in @xmath29 factors as a product @xmath594 , where @xmath595 is a monomial of @xmath470 and @xmath596 forms on the second lobe ( relative to @xmath52 and including @xmath590 as a marked point ) and @xmath597 is a monomial of only @xmath470 forms on the first lobe ( relative to @xmath590 ) . now , integrating out the @xmath587 positions , @xmath598 and if @xmath581 then @xmath599 by kontsevich s vanishing lemma ( * ? ? ? * lemma 6.4 ) . thus the only fibrewise boundary components which contribute are those for which @xmath600 . if @xmath601 then we will write @xmath602 . we will now compute the stokes boundary term @xmath603 . factor @xmath604 as @xmath605 the first map is given its standard fibrewise orientation and the second map is given the fibrewise orientation @xmath606 , where @xmath338 is the fibrewise orientation of @xmath547 . note that with these choices of orientation , @xmath607 the stokes formula then becomes @xmath608 where the sum runs over unordered pairs @xmath609 at most one of which is external ( if one is internal then we call it @xmath277 , and if both are internal then we choose one to call @xmath277 ) . [ key - relation ] suppose we are given four distinct vertices @xmath610 . then on @xmath611 , @xmath612 we can consider @xmath52 to be at infinity and in the corresponding affine presentation , @xmath613 . hence , on @xmath611 we have the relation @xmath614 . the result follows from multiplying both sides with @xmath615 since 1-forms anticommute . [ volume - forms ] for any triple of vertices @xmath616 , the 2-form @xmath617 is a fibrewise negative unit volume form for @xmath618 . in terms of the affine presentation ( relative to @xmath311 ) , one sees that @xmath619 is a fibrewise negative unit volume form for @xmath620 as follows . we factor @xmath621 as @xmath622 , and each of these maps has a fibrewise orientation as described in section [ orientations ] . the form @xmath569 is a fibrewise positive unit volume form for @xmath623 . the form @xmath624 is a negative fibrewise unit volume form for the restriction of @xmath625 to the face @xmath626 . translating to the cyclic presentation , @xmath627 since @xmath628 is constant on the fibres of @xmath629 , the first term in the final line integrates to zero on each fibre , and so we obtain the result . [ boundary - expansion ] consider a vertex set @xmath630 . on the boundary component @xmath631 the following identity holds . @xmath632 use induction on @xmath11 and the relation . suppose @xmath266 is a projective graph . write @xmath633 . given an edge @xmath270 between vertices @xmath634 with @xmath277 internal ( if @xmath182 is internal as well then we orient @xmath270 with head at @xmath277 ) and a second edge @xmath307 meeting @xmath277 , @xmath635 where the sign comes from sliding @xmath277 to the left past the edges @xmath636 . by lemmas [ boundary - expansion ] and [ volume - forms ] , @xmath637 by combining these we find that @xmath638 summing this over all unordered pairs @xmath639 and using then gives the desired result . as an illustration of theorem [ differential - of - graph ] , let us consider the product @xmath640 corresponding to the graph @xmath266 shown below , with internal vertex @xmath277 and projective orientation @xmath641 . we can express @xmath642 as a linear combination of edge forms as follows . on @xmath643 , @xmath644 by lemma [ volume - forms ] , @xmath645 this corresponds to the sum of graphs where each is given the orientation induced from that of @xmath266 by first deleting an edge and then contracting the @xmath646 edge . from this one finds that @xmath647 the @xmath514-forms on @xmath17 do not constitute a cyclic cooperad because the exterior product of forms , @xmath648 is invertible up to quasi - isomorphism but not on the nose . however , lemma [ cooperad - diagram ] below shows compatibility between the cyclic operad structure on @xmath17 and the cyclic cooperad structure on @xmath440 . if @xmath182 and @xmath277 are both in @xmath33 then commutativity of the diagram @xmath653 implies the formula in this case ; the reasoning is the same when @xmath654 . suppose now that @xmath655 and @xmath656 . choosing an identification @xmath97 , the map @xmath657 corresponds with the product map @xmath658 , and @xmath659 . commutativity of the diagram @xmath660 then implies the formula . [ cooperad - diagram ] ( c.f . * proposition 8.19 ) . ) the following diagram commutes : @xmath661{e , t}{_i\bullet_j } \node[2]{{\mathcal{pg}}_{i \sqcup \{x\ } } \otimes { \mathcal{pg}}_{j\sqcup\{y\ } } } \arrow{s , r}{{\mathscr{i}}\otimes { \mathscr{i } } } \\ \node { \omega_{pa}^*({f\underline{\mathcal{m}}}_{i\sqcup j } ) } \arrow{se , t}{({_x\circ_y})^ * } \node[2]{\omega_{pa}^*({f\underline{\mathcal{m}}}_{i\sqcup\{x\ } } ) \otimes \omega_{pa}^*({f\underline{\mathcal{m}}}_{j\sqcup\{y\ } } ) . } \arrow{sw } \\ \node[2]{\omega_{pa}^*({f\underline{\mathcal{m}}}_{i\sqcup \{x\ } } \times { f\underline{\mathcal{m}}}_{j\sqcup \{y\ } } ) } \end{diagram}\ ] ] the composition map @xmath662 is a principal @xmath184-bundle over its image @xmath663 , where the circle action is by rotating the rays at the @xmath52 and @xmath53 points in opposite directions . consider a graph @xmath664 with set of internal vertices @xmath259 . there are pullback squares @xmath665 and @xmath666 on each fibre over @xmath663 the quotient map @xmath667 is a diffeomorphism in the interior and finite to1 on the boundary . with this observation and the above pullback squares , one has @xmath668 where we choose compatible fibrewise orientations for @xmath137 and @xmath669 . the lemma now follows directly from this , lemma [ pullback - lemma ] , and the definition of the cooperad structure on @xmath440 from section [ cooperad - structure ] . the projective graph complexes @xmath670 collectively form a cyclic cooperad in the category of commutative dgas , and they are degree - wise finite dimensional . hence the graded duals @xmath671 form a cyclic operad in the category of cocommutative differential graded coalgebras . the projections @xmath672 determine a quasi - isomorphism of cyclic cooperads , so the dual morphisms , @xmath673 constitute a quasi - isomorphism of cyclic operads . let @xmath674 denote the symmetric monoidal functor of semi - algebraic chains with real coefficients @xcite . this functor is weakly equivalent to the functor of real singular chains @xmath675 , so the cyclic operads @xmath18 and @xmath676 are weakly equivalent . by ( 7.3 ) , if @xmath168 is compact then the natural evaluation map @xmath677 is a quasi - isomorphism . although the complexes @xmath678 do not form a cyclic operad , the compositions @xmath679 give a quasi - isomorphism of cyclic operads by lemma [ cooperad - diagram ] . this completes the proof . j. giansiracusa and p. salvatore , formality of the framed little 2-discs and semidirect products . to appear in proceedings of `` homotopy theory of function spaces and related topics , '' oberwolfach , april 5 - 11 , 2009 . Abstract:
[ "the framed little 2-discs operad is homotopy equivalent to the kimura - stasheff - voronov cyclic operad of moduli spaces of genus zero stable curves with tangent rays at the marked points and nodes . we show that this cyclic operad is formal , meaning that its chains and its homology ( the batalin - vilkovisky operad ) are quasi - isomorphic cyclic operads . to prove this we introduce a new complex of graphs in which the differential is a combination of edge deletion and contraction , and we show that this complex resolves bv as a cyclic operad ." ]
11,931
11,931
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the study of stars is one of the most fascinating topics in astrophysics because it involves many areas of physics : gravitation , thermodynamics , hydrodynamics , statistical mechanics , quantum mechanics , relativity , ... and it has furthermore a very interesting history . in his classical monograph _ the internal constitution of the stars _ , eddington ( 1926 ) @xcite lays down the foundations of the subject and describes in detail the basic processes that govern the structure of ordinary stars . at that stage , only elements of `` classical '' physics are used and difficulties with such theories to account for the structure of high density stars such as the companion of sirius are pointed out . soon after the discovery of the quantum statistics by fermi ( 1926 ) @xcite and dirac ( 1926 ) @xcite , fowler ( 1926 ) @xcite uses this `` new thermodynamics '' to explain the puzzling nature of white dwarf stars . he understands that low mass white dwarf stars owe their stability to the quantum pressure of the degenerate electron gas . ) . the case of a partially degenerate self - gravitating fermi gas at arbitrary temperature has been discussed more recently by hertel & thirring ( 1971 ) @xcite and chavanis ( 2002 ) @xcite in the context of statistical mechanics . they describe the phase transition , below a critical temperature @xmath9 , from a gaseous configuration to a condensed state ( with a degenerate core surrounded by a halo ) . this provides a simple physical mechanism showing how the system can reach highly degenerate configurations as a result of gravitational collapse ; see chavanis ( 2006 ) @xcite for a review on phase transitions in self - gravitating systems . ] the resulting structure is equivalent to a polytrope of index @xmath10 so that the mass - radius relation of classical white dwarf stars behaves like @xmath11 ( chandrasekhar 1931a @xcite ) . the next step was made by chandrasekhar , aged only nineteen , who was accepted by the university of cambridge to work with fowler . in the boat that took him from madras to southampton @xcite , chandrasekhar understands that relativistic effects are important in massive white dwarf stars and that einstein kinematic must be introduced in the problem . in his first treatment ( chandrasekhar 1931b @xcite ) , he considers the ultra - relativistic limit and shows that the resulting structure is equivalent to a polytrope of index @xmath12 . applying the theory of polytropic gas spheres ( emden 1907 @xcite ) , this leads to a unique value of the mass @xmath13 that he interprets as a limiting mass , nowdays called the chandrasekhar limit . quantum mechanics can not prevent the system from collapsing to a point . however , he did not take this collapse very seriously and noted that , in reality , there exists stars with mass @xmath14 that do not show this `` ridiculous tendency '' , so that they must possess regions in which the laws of quantum mechanics are violated . ] the complete mass - radius relation of relativistic white dwarf stars was given later ( chandrasekhar 1935 @xcite ) and departs from fowler s sequence as we approach the limiting mass . at this critical mass , the radius of the configuration vanishes . above the critical mass , the equation of state of the relativistic degenerate fermi gas of electrons is not able to balance gravitational forces and , when considering the final evolution of such a star , chandrasekhar ( 1934 ) @xcite `` left speculating on other possibility '' . chandrasekhar s result was severly criticized by eddington ( 1935 ) @xcite who viewed this result as _ a reductio ad absurdum _ of the relativistic formula and considered the combination of special relativity and non - relativistic quantum theory as an `` unholly alliance '' . because of the querelle with eddington , it took some time to realize the physical implication of chandrasekhar s results . however , progressively , his early investigations on white dwarf stars were extended in general relativity to the case of neutron stars ( oppenheimer & volkoff 1939 @xcite ) and finally led to the concept of `` black holes '' , a term coined by wheeler in 1967 . without the dispute with eddington , this ultimate stage of matter resulting from gravitational collapse could have been predicted much earlier from the discovery of chandrasekhar @xcite . although these historic elements are well - known , it is less well - known that the concept of a maximum mass for relativistic white dwarf stars had been introduced earlier by anderson ( 1929 ) @xcite and stoner ( 1930 ) @xcite . these studies are mentioned in the early works of chandrasekhar but they have been progressively forgotten and are rarely quoted in classical textbooks of astrophysics . these authors investigated the equation of state of a relativistic degenerate fermi gas and predicted an upper limit for the mass of white dwarf stars . stoner ( 1930 ) @xcite uses a uniform mass density to model the star while chandrasekhar ( 1931 ) @xcite considers a more realistic @xmath12 polytrope . however , as noted in chandrasekhar ( 1931 ) @xcite , the value of the limiting mass found by stoner with his simplified model is relatively close to that obtained with the improved treatment . interestingly , nauenberg ( 1972 ) @xcite introduced long after a simplified treatment of relativistic white dwarf stars in order to obtain an analytical approximation of the mass - radius relation . it turns out that this model , which gives a very good agreement with chandrasekhar s numerical results ( up to some normalization factors ) , is similar to that introduced by stoner . leaving aside these interesting historical remarks , the result of chandrasekhar @xcite concerning the existence of a limiting mass is very profound because this mass can be expressed in terms of fundamental constants , similarly to the bohr radius of the hydrogen atom @xcite . hence , the mass of stars is determined typically by the following combination @xmath15 where @xmath16 is the constant of gravity , @xmath17 the planck constant , @xmath18 the velocity of light and @xmath19 the mass of the hydrogen atom ( @xmath20 is the solar mass ) . this formula results from the combination of quantum mechanics ( @xmath17 ) , special relativity ( @xmath18 ) and gravity @xmath21 . since dimensional analysis plays a fundamental role in physics , it is of interest to investigate how the preceding results depend on the dimension of space @xmath1 of the universe . in our previous investigations @xcite , we considered the case of classical white dwarf stars in @xmath1 dimensions and found that they become unstable in a space of dimension @xmath8 . in that case , the star either evaporates or collapses . therefore , quantum mechanics can not stabilize matter against gravitational collapse in @xmath8 contrary to what happens in @xmath4 @xcite . interestingly , this is similar to a result found by ehrenfest @xcite at the atomic level for coulomb forces in bohr s model and for the planetary motion ( kepler problem ) . the object of this paper is to extend these results to the case of relativistic white dwarf stars and exhibit particular dimensions of space which play a special role in the problem when we combine newtonian gravity , quantum mechanics and special relativity . we shall see that the problem is very rich and interesting in its own right . it shows to which extent the dimension @xmath4 of our universe is particular , with possible implications regarding the anthropic principle @xcite . we note that a similar problem has been considered in @xcite on the basis of dimensional analysis . our approach is more precise since we generalize the _ exact _ mathematical treatment of chandrasekhar @xcite to a space of dimension @xmath1 . a connection with other works investigating the role played by the dimension of space on the laws of physics is made in the conclusion . in appendix [ sec_stab ] , we propose different derivations of the stability limits of polytropic spheres and consider applications of these results to classical and relativistic white dwarf stars . following chandrasekhar @xcite , we model a white dwarf star as a degenerate gas sphere in hydrostatic equilibrium . the pressure is due to the quantum properties of the electrons and the density to the protons . in the completely degenerate limit , the electrons have momenta less than a threshold value @xmath22 ( fermi momentum ) and their distribution function is @xmath23 where @xmath17 is the planck constant . there can only be two electrons in a phase space element of size @xmath24 on account of the pauli exclusion principle . therefore , the number of electrons per unit volume is @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the surface of a unit sphere in @xmath1-dimensions . the mean kinetic energy per electron is given by @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the energy of an electron with impulse @xmath29 . in relativistic mechanics , @xmath30 the pressure of the electrons is @xmath31 using eq . ( [ es3 ] ) , the pressure can be rewritten @xmath32 finally , the mass density of the star is @xmath33 where @xmath19 is the mass of the proton and @xmath34 the molecular weight . if we consider a pure gas of fermions ( like , e.g. , massive neutrinos in dark matter models ) , we just have to replace @xmath35 by their mass @xmath36 . introducing the notation @xmath37 , we can write the density of state parametrically as follows @xmath38 where @xmath39 @xmath40 the function @xmath41 has the asymptotic behaviors @xmath42 @xmath43 the classical limit corresponds to @xmath44 and the ultra - relativistic limit to @xmath45 . explicit expressions of the function @xmath41 are given in appendix [ sec_exp ] for different dimensions of space . we provide here the explicit expression of the function @xmath41 defined by eq . ( [ es9 ] ) for different dimensions of space @xmath261 and @xmath262 , respectively : @xmath271 @xmath272 @xmath273 @xmath274 for a spherically symmetric distribution of matter , the equations of hydrostatic equilibrum are @xmath46 @xmath47 they can be combined to give @xmath48 expressing @xmath49 and @xmath50 in terms of @xmath51 and setting @xmath52 , we obtain @xmath53 we denote by @xmath54 and @xmath55 the values of @xmath51 and @xmath56 at the center . furthermore , we define @xmath57 @xmath58 note that the scale of length @xmath59 is independent on @xmath60 for @xmath2 . substituting these transformations in eq . ( [ c4 ] ) , we obtain the @xmath1-dimensional generalization of chandrasekhar s differential equation @xmath61 with the boundary conditions @xmath62 the radius @xmath63 of the star is such that @xmath64 . this yields @xmath65 the density can be expressed as @xmath66 where the central density @xmath67 finally , we find that the mass is related to @xmath55 by @xmath68 note that @xmath60 does not _ explicitly _ enter in this expression for @xmath4 but it is of course present implicitly . in the classical case @xmath44 , we find that the equation of state takes the form @xmath69 with @xmath70 therefore a classical white dwarf star is equivalent to a polytrope of index @xcite : corresponds to the value of the polytropic index of a classical white dwarf star in @xmath4 . the index @xmath71 refers to its corresponding value in @xmath1 dimensions . the same convention is adopted for the other indices @xmath72 , @xmath73 and @xmath74 . ] @xmath75 polytropic stars are described by the lane - emden equation @xcite . this can be recovered as a limit of the chandrasekhar equation . for @xmath44 , we have @xmath76 . we define @xmath77 . to leading order , @xmath78 . setting @xmath79 and combining the foregoing results , we find that eq . ( [ c7 ] ) reduces to the lane - emden equation with index @xmath80 : @xmath81 @xmath82 note that the condition at the origin is @xmath83 instead of @xmath84 as in the ordinary lane - emden equation . however , using the homology theorem for polytropic spheres @xcite , we can easily relate @xmath85 to @xmath86 , the solution of the lane - emden equation with index @xmath87 and condition at the origin @xmath84 . in an appropriate system of coordinates ( see @xcite for details ) . complete polytropes correspond to the terminal point in the series of equilibria . the series becomes dynamically unstable with respect to the euler - poisson system ( saddle point of the energy functional ) after the turning point of mass @xmath88 which appears for @xmath6 . thus , classical white dwarf stars are stable for @xmath89 and unstable for @xmath8 . , width=302 ] the structure and the stability of polytropic spheres in various dimensions of space has been studied by chavanis & sire @xcite . for @xmath90 , this study exhibits two important indices : @xmath91 according to this study , a classical white dwarf star is self - confined ( complete ) if @xmath92 , i.e. @xmath93 . in that case , the density vanishes at a finite radius @xmath63 identified as the radius of the star . on the other hand , it is nonlinearly dynamically stable with respect to the euler - poisson system if @xmath94 , and linearly unstable otherwise . therefore , classical white dwarf stars are stable for @xmath89 and unstable for @xmath8 ( see fig . [ alphac ] and appendix [ sec_stab ] ) . for @xmath95 , classical white dwarf stars are always self - confined and stable . using the results of @xcite , the mass - radius relation for complete polytropes with index @xmath87 in @xmath1 dimensions is @xmath96 where we have defined @xmath97 where @xmath98 is such that @xmath99 . using eq . ( [ class2 ] ) , we find that the mass - radius relation for classical white dwarf stars in @xmath1 dimensions is @xmath100 for @xmath101 , the mass @xmath102 decreases as the radius @xmath63 increases while for @xmath103 and for @xmath104 it increases with the radius ( see fig . [ classique ] ) . and the mass is independent on radius in @xmath6 . the dimensional factors @xmath105 and @xmath106 are defined in sec . [ sec_gen ] . , width=302 ] for @xmath6 the mass is independent on the radius and given in terms of fundamental constants by @xmath107 we recall that the value of the gravitational constant @xmath16 depends on the dimension of space so that we can not give an explicit value to this limiting mass . the central density is related to the radius by @xmath108 for @xmath3 , the radius is independent on mass and given in terms of fundamental constants by @xmath109 furthermore , for @xmath3 , the lane - emden equation ( [ class4 ] ) with index @xmath110 can be solved analytically , yielding @xmath111 and @xmath112 where @xmath113 is the first zero of bessel function @xmath114 . we obtain a density profile @xmath115 where the central density is related to the total mass by @xmath116 finally , for @xmath4 , using the mass - radius relation ( [ class9 ] ) , we find that the average density is related to the total mass by @xmath117 ( for @xmath118 ) . historically , this result was obtained by chandrasekhar ( 1931 ) @xcite who first applied the theory of polytropic gas spheres with index @xmath10 to classical white dwarf stars . it improves an earlier result @xmath119 obtained by stoner ( 1929 ) @xcite on the basis of his model of stars with uniform density ( see sec . [ sec_ana ] ) . in the ultra - relativistic limit @xmath45 , we find that the equation of state takes the form @xmath120 with @xmath121 therefore , an ultra - relativistic white dwarf star is equivalent to a polytrope of index @xmath122 this also directly results from the chandrasekhar equation . for @xmath45 , it reduces to @xmath123 @xmath124 where we have set @xmath125 and @xmath126 . this is the lane - emden equation with index @xmath127 . in an appropriate system of coordinates ( see @xcite for details ) . complete polytropes correspond to the terminal point in the series of equilibria . the series becomes dynamically unstable with respect to the euler - poisson system ( saddle point of the energy functional ) after the turning point of mass @xmath88 which appears for @xmath4 . thus , ultra - relativistic white dwarf stars are stable for @xmath128 and unstable for @xmath129 . , width=302 ] using the results of @xcite for @xmath90 , we deduce that an ultra - relativistic white dwarf star is self - confined if @xmath130 , i.e. @xmath131 . in addition , it is nonlinearly dynamically stable with respect to the euler - poisson system if @xmath132 and linearly unstable otherwise . therefore , ultra - relativistic white dwarf stars are stable for @xmath133 and unstable for @xmath129 ( see fig . [ alphar ] and appendix [ sec_stab ] ) . for @xmath95 , ultra - relativistic white dwarf stars are self - confined and stable . on the other hand , using the results of @xcite , the mass - radius relation for complete polytropes with index @xmath127 in @xmath1 dimensions is @xmath134 where we have defined @xmath135 using eq . ( [ ur2 ] ) , we find that the mass - radius relation for ultra - relativistic white dwarf stars in @xmath1 dimensions is @xmath136 for @xmath137 , the mass @xmath102 increases as the radius @xmath63 increases while for @xmath138 it decreases with the radius ( see fig . [ relativiste ] ) . and the mass is independent on radius in @xmath4 ( chandrasekhar s mass ) . , width=302 ] for @xmath2 , the radius is independent on mass and given in terms of fundamental constants by @xmath139 furthermore , for @xmath2 , the lane - emden equation ( [ ur4 ] ) with index @xmath140 can be solved analytically , yielding @xmath141 and @xmath142 . we obtain a density profile @xmath143 where the central density is related to the total mass by @xmath144 for @xmath4 , the mass is independent on radius and given in terms of fundamental constants by @xmath145 this is the chandrasekhar mass @xmath146 coming back to eq . ( [ c7 ] ) , we can show that for this limiting value , the radius @xmath63 of the configuration tends to zero ( see sec . [ sec_gen ] ) . historically , the existence of a maximum mass for relativistic white dwarf stars was first published by anderson ( 1929 ) @xcite who considered a relativistic extension of the model of stoner ( 1929 ) @xcite for classical white dwarf stars . he obtained a limiting mass @xmath147 ( for @xmath118 ) . the relativistic treatment of anderson was criticized and corrected by stoner ( 1930 ) @xcite who obtained a value of the limiting mass @xmath148 . the uniform density model of stoner was in turn criticized and corrected by chandrasekhar ( 1931 ) @xcite who applied the theory of polytropic gas spheres with index @xmath12 to relativistic white dwarf stars and obtained the value ( [ ur13 ] ) of the limiting mass @xmath149 . it seems that these historical details are not well - known because the references to the works of anderson and stoner progressively disappeared from the literature . collecting together the results of sec . [ sec_c ] , the mass - radius relation for relativistic white dwarf stars in @xmath1 dimensions can be written in the general case under the parametric form @xmath150 where we have defined @xmath151 and @xmath152 the mass @xmath105 and the radius @xmath106 can be expressed in terms of fundamental constants as @xmath153 @xmath154 we can now obtain the mass - radius curve @xmath155 by the following procedure . we fix a value of the parameter @xmath60 and solve the differential equation ( [ c7 ] ) with initial condition ( [ c8 ] ) until the point @xmath156 , determined by eq . ( [ c9 ] ) , at which the density vanishes . the radius and the mass of the corresponding configuration are then given by eq . ( [ gen1 ] ) . by varying @xmath55 , we can obtain the full curve @xmath157 parameterized by the value of the central density @xmath158 given by eq . ( [ c11 ] ) . to solve the differential equation ( [ c7 ] ) , we need the behavior of @xmath159 at the origin . expanding @xmath160 in taylor series and substituting this expansion in eq . ( [ c7 ] ) we obtain for @xmath161 : @xmath162 where @xmath163 we note in particular that @xmath164 . . the radius increases with the mass . the configurations are always stable and there exists a maximum radius achieved in the ultra - relativistic limit for @xmath165 . , width=302 ] . the configurations are always stable and there exists a maximum radius for partially relativistic distributions . , width=302 ] . the radius decreases with the mass . the configurations are always stable and there exists a maximum radius achieved in the classical limit for @xmath166 . , width=302 ] . the radius decreases with the mass . the configurations are always stable . , width=302 ] . the radius decreases with the mass . the configurations are always stable and there exists a limiting mass ( chandrasekhar s mass ) achieved in the ultra - relativistic limit for @xmath167 . for @xmath168 , quantum mechanics can not arrest gravitational collapse . , width=302 ] finally , we give the asymptotic expressions of the mass - radius relation . in the classical limit , using eq . ( [ class9 ] ) , we obtain @xmath169 in the ultra - relativistic limit , using eq . ( [ ur8 ] ) , we get @xmath170 in figs . [ chandra1]-[chandra4 ] , we plot the mass - radius relation of relativistic white dwarf stars ( full line ) for different dimensions of space . the asymptotic relations ( [ gen8 ] ) and ( [ gen9 ] ) valid in the classical ( c ) and ultra - relativistic ( r ) limits are also shown for comparison ( dashed line ) together with the analytical approximation ( dotted line ) derived in sec . [ sec_ana ] . . there exists a limiting mass for partially relativistic distributions . classical configurations are stable and the series of relativistic equilibria becomes unstable after the turning point of mass . thus , highly relativistic configurations in @xmath129 can not be in hydrostatic equilibrium.,width=302 ] . for @xmath171 the ultra - relativistic configurations ( equivalent to polytropes of index @xmath172 ) are not self - confined anymore and a spiral develops in the mass - radius relation . this is somehow similar to the classical spiral occurring in the @xmath173 plane in the thermodynamics of isothermal self - gravitating systems @xcite and to the spiral occurring in the @xmath174 plane in the general relativistic treatment of neutron stars @xcite . the series of equilibria becomes unstable at the first turning point of mass and new modes of instability occur at the secondary turning points @xcite.,width=302 ] . there exists a limiting mass achieved in the classical limit for @xmath175 . in fact , for @xmath8 , all the configurations ( classical and relativistic ) are unstable . quantum mechanics can not balance gravitational attraction even in the classical limit . , width=302 ] we present here an analytical approximation of the mass - radius relation in various dimensions of space based on the treatment by nauenberg @xcite in @xmath4 . this treatment amounts to considering that the density is uniform in the star and the mass - radius relation is obtained by minimizing the energy functional ( see appendix [ sec_ef ] ) with respect to the radius ( or to the density ) at fixed mass . as mentioned in the introduction , this is similar to the simplified model of relativistic white dwarf stars made by stoner @xcite before chandrasekhar s treatment @xcite . following nauenberg @xcite , we approximate the kinetic energy @xmath176 by the form @xmath177 where @xmath178 is the number of electrons and @xmath29 is an average over the star of the momentum of the electrons . ) of the kinetic energy in his treatment . this leads to more complicated expressions with , however , qualitatively similar conclusions . since the models are based on the ( unrealistic ) approximation that the stellar density is homogeneous , the results can not be expected to be more than qualitatively correct . therefore , the approximation ( [ ana1 ] ) made by nauenberg for the kinetic energy is sufficient for the purposes of this simplified approach . ] we assume that it is determined by an appropriate average value of the density by the relation @xmath179 based on the pauli exclusion principle . now , for the density , we write @xmath180 where @xmath181 is a dimensionless parameter . we also write the potential energy in the form @xmath182 where @xmath183 is another dimensionless parameter . by writing eq . ( [ ana4 ] ) , we have assumed that @xmath184 but we shall see that the following results pass to the limit for @xmath185 . we introduce two dimensionless variables @xmath186 and @xmath187 and two fixed constants @xmath188 and @xmath189 such that @xmath190 we determine @xmath191 and @xmath189 by the requirement that the relativity parameter @xmath192 have the form @xmath193 and that the potential energy can be written @xmath194 this yields @xmath195 @xmath196 comparing with eqs . ( [ gen4 ] ) and ( [ gen5 ] ) , we find that @xmath197 now , the energy @xmath198 of the star can be written @xmath199 in the classical limit @xmath44 , we get @xmath200 and in the ultra - relativistic limit @xmath45 , we obtain @xmath201 we shall consider the energy as a function of the radius @xmath63 , with the mass @xmath102 fixed . thus , the mass - radius relation will be obtained by minimizing the energy @xmath202 versus @xmath51 with fixed @xmath203 . writing @xmath204 , we obtain the equations @xmath205 @xmath206 defining the mass - radius relation in parametric form in the framework of the simplified model . note that @xmath207 represents the value of the density in units of @xmath208 , i.e. @xmath209 . therefore , eq . ( [ ana12 ] ) can be viewed as the relation between the mass and the density . eliminating the relativity parameter @xmath51 ( or density ) between eqs . ( [ ana12 ] ) and ( [ ana13 ] ) , we explicitly obtain @xmath210 @xmath211 @xmath212 @xmath213 in @xmath2 , there exists a maximum radius @xmath214 achieved for @xmath215 , and we have the scaling @xmath216 in @xmath3 , there exists a maximum radius @xmath214 achieved for @xmath217 , and we have the scaling @xmath218 in @xmath4 , there exists a maximum mass @xmath219 ( chandrasekhar s mass ) achieved for @xmath220 , and we have the scaling @xmath221 in @xmath6 , there exists a maximum mass @xmath219 achieved for @xmath222 , and we have the scaling @xmath223 in order to compare eqs . ( [ ana14])-([ana17 ] ) with the exact results , we need to estimate the values of the constants @xmath181 and @xmath183 . this can be done by considering the limiting forms of eqs . ( [ ana12 ] ) and ( [ ana13 ] ) . in the classical limit @xmath44 , we obtain @xmath224 and in the ultra - relativistic limit @xmath45 , we get @xmath225 comparing with eqs . ( [ gen8 ] ) and ( [ gen9 ] ) , we find that @xmath226 where the quantities @xmath227 and @xmath228 can be deduced from the numerical study of the lane - emden equation . the analytical approximations of the mass - radius relation ( [ ana14])-([ana17 ] ) are plotted in dotted lines in figs . [ chandra1 ] , [ chandra2 ] , [ chandra3 ] , and they give a fair agreement with the exact results ( full line ) . of course , they can not reproduce the spiral in @xmath6 which requires the resolution of the full differential equation ( [ c7 ] ) . let us address the stability of the configurations within this simplified analytical model . if we view a white dwarf star as a gas of electrons at statistical equilibrium at temperature @xmath229 , stable configurations are those that minimize the free energy @xmath230 at fixed mass , where @xmath202 is the total energy ( kinetic @xmath231 potential ) and @xmath232 is the fermi - dirac entropy ( see appendix [ sec_ef ] ) . for a completely degenerate gas at @xmath0 , stable configurations are those that minimize the energy @xmath202 at fixed mass . as we have seen previously , the first order variations @xmath233 determine the mass - radius relation . then , the configurations is stable if the energy is minimum , i.e. @xmath234 . now , we have @xmath235 for @xmath133 , all the solutions are stable while for @xmath8 , all the solutions are unstable . for @xmath236 , the solutions with @xmath237 are stable and the solutions with @xmath238 are unstable where @xmath239 we now show that the onset of instability precisely corresponds to the turning point of mass , i.e. to the point where the mass is maximum in the series of equilibria @xmath240 . in terms of reduced variables , this corresponds to @xmath241 , or equivalently @xmath242 . taking the logarithmic derivative of eq . ( [ ana12 ] ) , we have @xmath243 so that the condition @xmath242 yields @xmath244 . thus , instability sets in precisely at the maximum mass as could have been directly inferred from the turning point criterion @xcite . it is also useful to discuss the classical and the ultra - relativistic limits specifically . in the classical limit , using eq . ( [ ana11class ] ) , we get @xmath245 so that a classical white dwarf star is stable for @xmath89 and unstable for @xmath8 . in the ultra - relativistic limit , using eq . ( [ ana11relat ] ) , we get @xmath246 so that an ultra - relativistic white dwarf star is stable for @xmath133 and unstable for @xmath129 . this returns the results obtained in secs . [ sec_class ] and [ sec_ur ] . finally , considering the function @xmath247 given by eq . ( [ ana11 ] ) and assuming that the system evolves so as to minimize its energy ( this requires some source of dissipation ) , we have the following results : because they are elementary , but drawing them is helpful to visualize the results described in the text . ] for @xmath248 , there exists a stable equilibrium state ( global minimum of @xmath202 ) with radius @xmath63 for all mass @xmath102 . for @xmath4 , there exists a maximum mass @xmath13 so that : ( i ) for @xmath249 , there exists a stable equilibrium state ( global minimum of @xmath202 ) with radius @xmath250 ( ii ) for @xmath251 , the system collapses to a point ( @xmath167 ) but its energy remains finite ( lower bound ) ( iii ) for @xmath14 , the system collapses to a point @xmath252 and @xmath253 . for @xmath254 , there exists a maximum mass @xmath13 so that : ( i ) for @xmath249 , there exists a metastable equilibrium state ( local minimum of @xmath202 ) with @xmath237 and an unstable equilibrium state ( global maximum of @xmath202 ) with @xmath238 . the system can either reach the metastable state or collapse to a point ( @xmath252 , @xmath253 ) ; the choice probably depends on a notion of basin of attraction ( ii ) for @xmath255 , the system collapses to a point ( @xmath252 , @xmath253 ) . for @xmath256 , there exists a critical mass @xmath13 so that : ( i ) for @xmath249 , there exists an unstable equilibrium state ( global maximum of @xmath202 ) so the system either collapses ( @xmath252 and @xmath253 ) or evaporates ( @xmath175 and @xmath257 ) ( ii ) for @xmath14 , the system collapses to a point ( @xmath252 and @xmath253 ) . for @xmath258 , there exists an unstable equilibrium state ( global maximum of @xmath202 ) for all mass @xmath102 so the system either collapses ( @xmath252 and @xmath253 ) or evaporates ( @xmath175 and @xmath257 ) . _ `` why is our universe three dimensional ? does the dimension @xmath4 play a special role among other space dimensions ? '' _ several scientists have examined the role played by the dimension of space in determining the form of the laws of physics . this question goes back to ptolemy who argues in his treatise _ on dimensionality _ that no more than three spatial dimensions are possible in nature . in the @xmath259 century , kant realizes the deep connection between the inverse square law of gravitation and the existence of three spatial dimensions . interestingly , he regards the three spatial dimensions as a consequence of newton s inverse square law rather than the converse . in the twentieth century , ehrenfest @xcite , in a paper called `` in what way does it become manifest in the fundamental laws of physics that space has three dimensions ? '' argues that planetary orbits , atoms and molecules would be unstable in a space of dimension @xmath8 . this idea has been followed more recently by gurevich & mostepanenko @xcite who argue that if the universe is made of metagalaxies with various number of dimensions , atomic matter and life are possible only in @xmath260-dimensional space . other investigations on dimensionality are reviewed in the paper of barrow @xcite . we have found that the relativistic self - gravitating fermi gas at @xmath0 ( a white dwarf star ) possesses a rich structure as a function of the dimension of space . we have exhibited several characteristic dimensions @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 and @xmath7 . for @xmath248 , there exists stable configurations for any value of the mass . for @xmath4 , the sequence of equilibrium configurations is stable but there exists a maximum mass ( chandrasekhar s limit ) above which there is no equilibrium state . for @xmath254 , the sequence of equilibrium configurations is stable for classical white dwarf stars but it becomes unstable for relativistic white dwarf stars with high density after the turning point of mass . therefore , the dimension @xmath4 is special because it is the largest dimension at which the sequence of equilibrium configurations is stable all the way long ; for @xmath129 , a turning point of mass appears so that ultra - relativistic white dwarf stars become unstable . therefore , the dimension @xmath4 is _ marginal _ in that respect . finally , for @xmath8 , the whole sequence of equilibrium configurations is unstable . therefore , as already noted in our previous papers @xcite , the dimension @xmath6 is critical because at that dimension quantum mechanics can not stabilize matter against gravitational collapse , even in the classical regime , contrary to the situation in @xmath4 @xcite . interestingly , this result is similar to that of ehrenfest @xcite although it applies to white dwarf stars instead of atoms . our exact description of @xmath1-dimensional white dwarf stars based on chandrasekhar s seminal paper @xcite shows that relativistic white dwarf stars become unstable in @xmath129 and that classical white dwarf stars become unstable in @xmath8 . therefore , for @xmath8 , a self - gravitating fermi gas forms a black hole or evaporates ( see appendix [ sec_stab ] ) . these conclusions have also been reached by bechhoefer & chabrier @xcite on the basis of simple dimensional analysis . this suggests that a @xmath8 universe is not viable ( see also appendix [ sec_fourd ] ) and gives insight why our universe in apparently three dimensional . we note that extra - dimensions can appear at the micro - scale , an idea originating from kaluza - klein theory . this idea took a renaissance in modern theories of grand unification which are formulated in higher - dimensional spaces . cm ) and it is a theoretical challenge to explain why only three dimensions are expanded while the others are compact . we note that a universe with @xmath129 dimensions would be very different from ours since compact objects like white dwarfs or neutron stars would be unstable and replaced by black holes . in fact , _ all the matter would collapse to a single point in a finite time _ ( see appendix [ sec_fourd ] ) . this observation may be connected to the fact that only three dimensions are extended . ] our approach shows that already at a simple level , the coupling between newton s equations ( gravitation ) , fermi - dirac statistics ( quantum mechanics ) and special relativity reveals a rich structure as a function of @xmath1 . in this respect , it is interesting to note that the critical masses ( [ class10 ] ) ( [ ur12 ] ) and radii ( [ class11 ] ) ( [ ur9 ] ) that we have found occur for simple _ integer _ dimensions @xmath261 and @xmath262 , which was not granted a priori . it is interesting to develop a parallel between the mass - radius relation @xmath240 of white dwarf stars and the caloric curve @xmath263 giving the temperature as a function of the energy in the thermodynamics of self - gravitating systems @xcite . in this analogy , the chandrasekhar mass in @xmath4 is the counterpart of the critical temperature for isothermal systems in @xmath3 ( in both cases , the equilibrium density profile is a dirac peak containing all the mass ) . for relativistic white dwarf stars in @xmath4 ( corresponding to a polytrope @xmath264 ) , the critical mass @xmath265 of bacterial populations described by the keller - segel model in @xmath3 ( corresponding to @xmath266 ) and the critical mass @xmath267 or critical temperature @xmath268 of self - gravitating isothermal systems in @xmath3 ( corresponding to @xmath266 ) @xcite . at these critical values @xmath251 or @xmath269 , the system forms a dirac peak . this analogy , sketched in sec . 8 of astro - ph/0604012v1 , is addressed specifically in @xcite . ] on the other hand , for @xmath129 , the mass - radius relation for white dwarf stars exhibits turning points , and even a spiraling behavior for @xmath270 , which is similar to the spiraling behavior of the caloric curve for isothermal systems in @xmath4 . in this analogy , the maximum mass , corresponding to a critical value of the central density which parameterizes the series of equilibria , is the counterpart of the antonov energy ( in the microcanonical ensemble ) @xcite or of the emden temperature ( in the canonical ensemble ) @xcite . the series of equilibria becomes unstable after this turning point . in addition , there is no equilibrium state above this maximum mass , or below the minimum energy or minimum temperature in the thermodynamical problem . in that case , the system is expected to undergo gravitational collapse . as a last comment ( notified by the referee ) , it should be emphasized that the conclusions reached in this paper concerning dimensionality implicitly assume that the laws of physics that we know remain the same in a universe of arbitrary dimension @xmath1 . this is of course not granted at all . there may be a new cosmological theory , a new theory of star formation and stellar evolution in higher dimensions . we also emphasize that our approach does not take into account general relativistic effects that can sensibly modify the results @xcite . _ acknowledgements : _ i am grateful to e. blackman and g. chabrier for pointing out their works after a first version of this paper was placed on astro - ph/0603250 . special thanks are due to n. barros for interesting discussions . we generalize in @xmath1 dimensions the usual stability criteria for polytropic gaseous spheres , and apply them to classical and ultra - relativistic white dwarf stars . let us consider the euler - poisson system @xcite : @xmath275 @xmath276 @xmath277 describing the dynamical evolution of a barotropic gas with an equation of state @xmath278 . the euler - poisson system conserves the mass @xmath102 and the energy @xcite : @xmath279 in the following , we shall essentially consider the case of a polytropic equation of state @xmath280 where @xmath281 . for @xmath282 , the energy functional @xmath283 is given by @xmath284 it can be rewritten @xmath285 for an isothermal equation of state @xmath286 , corresponding to @xmath287 or @xmath215 , we have @xmath288 for a general polytropic equation of state @xmath289 with arbitrary @xmath290 , it is convenient to write the energy of the gas in the form @xmath291 we have added a constant term @xmath292 proportional to the total mass ( which is a conserved quantity ) so as to recover the energy ( [ qw3 ] ) of an isothermal gas in the limit @xmath287 @xcite . we first consider the linear dynamical stability of a polytropic star described by the euler - poisson system and generalize the approach developed in chavanis @xcite . we consider a steady solution of the euler - poisson system satisfying @xmath293 and the condition of hydrostatic balance @xmath294 . for a polytropic equation of state @xmath295 , the equilibrium density profile is solution of the @xmath1-dimensional lane - emden equation @xcite . we consider _ complete polytropes _ such that the density vanishes at a finite radius @xmath63 . for @xmath296 , there exists a unique steady state for any mass @xmath102 . the mass - radius relation is @xcite : @xmath297 where @xmath298 is a constant given in terms of the solution @xmath299 of the lane - emden equation of index @xmath186 in @xmath1 dimensions . for the critical index @xmath300 , steady state solutions exist only for a unique value of the mass @xmath301 these solutions have the same mass @xmath13 but an arbitrary radius @xmath63 . we already anticipate that the index @xmath300 will correspond to a case of marginal stability separating stable and unstable solutions . linearizing the equations of motion ( [ stab1])-([stab3 ] ) around a stationary solution in hydrostatic balance and writing the perturbation in the form @xmath302 , we obtain after some calculations @xcite the eigenvalue equation @xmath303 where we have restricted ourselves to spherically symmetric perturbations and defined @xmath304 . for a polytropic gas with an equation of state @xmath289 , the foregoing equation becomes @xcite : @xmath305 the polytrope is stable if @xmath306 ( yielding oscillatory modes with pulsation @xmath307 ) and unstable if @xmath308 ( yielding exponentially growing modes with growth rate @xmath309 ) . considering the point of marginal stability ( @xmath310 ) and introducing the emden variables @xcite , eq . ( [ stab5 ] ) reduces to @xmath311 this equation has the exact solution @xcite : @xmath312 the point of marginal stability is then determined by the boundary conditions . one can show @xcite that the velocity perturbation is given by @xmath313 . therefore , if the density of the configuration vanishes at @xmath314 , one must have @xmath315 to avoid unphysical divergences . thus , if @xmath316 denotes the value of the normalized radius @xmath63 of the star @xcite such that @xmath317 , the natural boundary condition for the eigenvalue equation ( [ stab5 ] ) is @xmath318 . substituting this condition in eq . ( [ stab7 ] ) , we obtain the critical index @xmath319 corresponding to a marginally stable gaseous polytrope ( @xmath310 ) . our method gives the form ( [ stab7 ] ) of the neutral perturbation @xmath320 at the critical index @xmath300 . we conclude that the infinite family of steady state solutions with equal mass @xmath13 and arbitrary radius @xmath63 that exists for @xmath300 is marginally stable . we now consider the nonlinear dynamical stability problem . since the euler - poisson system ( [ stab1])-([stab3 ] ) conserves the mass @xmath102 and the energy @xmath283 , a maximum or a minimum of the energy functional @xmath321 $ ] at fixed mass @xmath322=m$ ] determines a steady state of the euler - poisson system that is formally nonlinearly dynamically stable @xcite . because of the presence of the kinetic term @xmath323=(1/2)\int \rho { \bf u}^{2}d{\bf r}$ ] , the functional @xmath321 $ ] has no absolute maximum . thus , we need to investigate the possible existence of a minimum of @xmath324 $ ] at fixed mass @xmath322=m$ ] . a barotropic star that minimizes the energy functional @xmath283 at fixed mass @xmath102 is nonlinearly dynamically stable with respect to the euler - poisson system . the cancellation of the first order variations @xmath325 , where @xmath326 is a lagrange multiplier , yields @xmath293 and the condition of hydrostatic balance @xmath294 . then , the condition of nonlinear dynamical stability is @xmath327 for all perturbations that conserve mass , i.e. @xmath328 . after some calculations @xcite , this can be put in the quadratic form @xmath329 we are led therefore to consider the eigenvalue problem @xmath330 if all the eigenvalues @xmath331 are negative , then @xmath332 and the configuration is a minimum of @xmath283 at fixed mass . this implies that it is nonlinearly dynamically stable . if at least one eigenvalue @xmath331 is positive , the configuration is a saddle point of @xmath283 and the star is dynamically unstable . the marginal case is when the largest eigenvalue @xmath331 is equal to zero . now , for @xmath310 , eqs . ( [ fdf2 ] ) and ( [ stab4 ] ) coincide . this implies that the conditions of linear and nonlinear dynamical stability are the same . in the case of polytropic stars , the case of marginal stability corresponds to the critical index @xmath300 . at that index , the equilibrium configurations with mass @xmath13 and radius @xmath63 _ all _ have the same value of energy @xmath333 ( see eq . ( [ stab22 ] ) later ) . this is therefore a very degenerate situation . the nonlinear dynamical stability of gaseous polytropes can also be investigated by plotting the series of equilibria @xmath334 ( mass vs central density ) of box - confined configurations and using the turning point argument of poincar @xcite . we can thus determine whether the last point on the series of equilibria , which corresponds to a _ complete polytrope _ whose density vanishes precisely at the box radius , is stable or not . for @xmath95 , there is no turning point of mass ( we restrict ourselves to @xmath335 ) , implying that the gaseous polytropes are always stable . for @xmath90 , a turning point of mass @xmath334 appears precisely for @xmath336 ( see fig . 5 of @xcite ) . this method shows that , for @xmath90 , complete polytropes with @xmath337 are nonlinearly dynamically stable ( they are minima of @xmath283 at fixed mass @xmath102 ) while complete polytropes with @xmath338 are dynamically unstable ( they are saddle points of @xmath283 at fixed mass @xmath102 ) . complete polytropes with @xmath336 and @xmath251 are marginally stable . we can also investigate the linear dynamical stability of gaseous polytropic spheres by using the method introduced by eddington @xcite and ledoux @xcite . if we introduce the radial displacement @xmath339 we can rewrite the eigenvalue equation ( [ stab5 ] ) in the form @xcite : @xmath340 this is the eddington equation of pulsations , which has been written here in the form of a sturm - liouville problem . it must be supplemented by the boundary conditions @xmath341 @xmath342 where @xmath343 is the lagrangian derivative of the pressure . since @xmath344 at the surface of the star , it is sufficient to demand that @xmath345 and @xmath346 be finite in @xmath314 . multiplying eq . ( [ stab10 ] ) by @xmath345 and integrating between @xmath347 and @xmath63 , we obtain @xmath348 the system is linearly dynamically stable if @xmath349 and unstable otherwise . since @xmath350 , a sufficient condition of stability is @xmath351 , i.e. @xmath352 it can be shown furthermore ( see below ) that the system is unstable if @xmath353 so that the criterion ( [ stab12 ] ) is a necessary and sufficient condition of dynamical stability ( the case @xmath354 is marginal ) . in terms of the index @xmath186 , a complete polytrope is stable with respect to the euler - poisson system in @xmath2 for @xmath335 and for @xmath355 , in @xmath3 for @xmath356 , in @xmath4 for @xmath357 and in @xmath90 for @xmath358 . from the theory of sturm - liouville problems , it is known that expression ( [ stab11 ] ) , which can be written @xmath359 , forms the basis of a variational principle . the function @xmath360 which maximizes the functional @xmath361 is the fundamental eigenfunction and the maximum value of this functional gives the fundamental eigenvalue @xmath362 . furthermore , any trial function under - estimates the value of @xmath362 so this variational principle may prove the existence of instability but can only give approximate information concerning stability . as shown by ledoux & pekeris @xcite , we can get a good approximation of the fundamental eigenvalue by taking @xmath360 to be a constant ( note that @xmath363 , i.e. @xmath364 , is the _ exact _ solution of the sturm - liouville equation ( [ stab10 ] ) at the point of marginal stability @xmath310 for a polytropic equation of state ) . for the trial function @xmath365 , expression ( [ stab11 ] ) gives @xmath366 according to the condition of hydrostatic balance , @xmath367 we have @xmath368 where we recognize the virial @xmath369 inserting @xmath370 in eq . ( [ stab16 ] ) , interchanging the dummy variables @xmath371 and @xmath372 and taking the half - sum of the resulting expressions , we get @xmath373 therefore , the virial can be written @xmath374 @xmath375 where @xmath376 is the potential energy and @xmath377 is the gravitational potential . therefore , we can rewrite eq . ( [ stab13 ] ) in the form @xmath378 where @xmath379 is the moment of inertia . since @xmath380 , we conclude that the system is unstable if @xmath381 , which completes the proof above . on the other hand , eq . ( [ stab17 ] ) provides an estimate of the pulsation period @xmath307 when the system is stable . this is the @xmath1-dimensional generalization of the ledoux stability criterion . note finally that , for a spherically symmetric system , using the gauss theorem @xmath382 we get @xmath383 this expression may be useful to calculate the potential energy . the virial theorem associated with the barotropic euler - poisson system ( [ stab1])-([stab3 ] ) is @xcite : @xmath384 where @xmath385 is the kinetic energy of the macroscopic motion and @xmath386 . for a polytropic equation of state , the energy functional ( [ wkre ] ) , which is a conserved quantity , can be written @xmath387 where @xmath388 is the internal energy . we note that @xmath389 for a polytrope . at equilibrium , @xmath390 , we get @xmath391 and @xmath392 . for @xmath3 , this implies that @xmath393 . for @xmath394 , this implies that @xmath395 where we recall that @xmath396 for @xmath90 and @xmath335 , the system is dynamically stable if @xmath397 and unstable otherwise ( poincar argument @xcite ) . since @xmath398 , we find from eq . ( [ stab22 ] ) that the polytropic star is stable if and only if @xmath399 . at the point of marginal stability @xmath300 , where several steady configurations exist with the same mass @xmath13 given by eq . ( [ dim13b ] ) and an arbitrary radius @xmath63 , the energy of these configurations is @xmath333 for all @xmath63 . using @xmath400 and eliminating the pressure term in eq . ( [ vir1 ] ) , the virial theorem for @xmath184 can be put in the form @xmath401 alternatively , eliminating the kinetic energy in eq . ( [ vir1 ] ) , the virial theorem for @xmath184 can be written @xmath402 for @xmath403 , corresponding to classical white dwarf stars , the virial theorem becomes @xmath404 for @xmath405 , corresponding to relativistic white dwarf stars , we have @xmath406 finally , considering the polytropic index @xmath300 of marginal stability , the virial theorem ( [ vir2 ] ) takes the form @xmath407 if we consider the dimension @xmath6 , it reduces to @xmath408 this equation describes the case of classical white dwarf stars at the critical dimension @xmath6 where @xmath409 . it can be integrated into @xmath410 for @xmath411 , we find that @xmath412 for @xmath413 so that the system evaporates . alternatively , for @xmath414 , we find that @xmath415 in a finite time , so that the system collapses and forms a dirac peak in a finite time . if we consider the dimension @xmath4 , eq . ( [ vir3 ] ) reduces to @xmath416 this equation describes the case of relativistic white dwarf stars at the critical dimension @xmath4 where @xmath417 . for @xmath411 , we find that @xmath412 for @xmath413 indicating that the system evaporates . finally , we show that the instability criterion for polytropic stars can be obtained from simple dimensional analysis . we shall approximate the internal energy ( [ vir1c ] ) and the potential energy ( [ stab19b ] ) by @xmath418 @xmath419 where @xmath102 is the total mass of the configuration and @xmath63 its radius ( @xmath183 and @xmath181 are dimensionless parameters ) . for homogeneous spheres , the values of @xmath181 and @xmath183 are given by eq . ( [ dim1c ] ) . with these expressions , the energy functional ( [ qw1 ] ) becomes @xmath420 we now need to minimize this functional with respect to @xmath63 for a given mass @xmath102 ( a minimum necessarily requires @xmath421 ) . we first look for the existence of critical points ( extrema ) . the cancellation of the first order variations @xmath422 yields the mass - radius relation @xmath423 this relation determines the radius @xmath63 of the star as a function of its mass @xmath102 . this expression is consistent with the exact mass - radius relation ( [ dim13 ] ) deduced from the lane - emden equation ( of course , our simple approach can only model compact density profiles corresponding to @xmath424 for @xmath90 ) @xcite . for @xmath296 , there is one , and only one , extremum of @xmath425 for each mass @xmath102 . in order to have a true minimum , we need to impose @xmath426 therefore , the system is stable if @xmath427 and unstable otherwise . this simple dimensional analysis returns the exact stability criterion ( [ stab12 ] ) . we can be a little more precise . for @xmath428 , the functional @xmath425 has a global minimum reached for a finite , and non - zero , value of @xmath63 . this solution is stable . for @xmath429 , the functional @xmath425 has an unstable global maximum : for @xmath103 , @xmath430 when @xmath175 ( evaporation ) and @xmath431 when @xmath252 ( collapse ) ; for @xmath3 , @xmath430 when @xmath252 and @xmath175 ; for @xmath90 and @xmath432 , @xmath430 when @xmath252 and @xmath433 ; for @xmath90 and @xmath434 , @xmath430 when @xmath252 and @xmath431 when @xmath433 . since we have constructed a particular configuration ( homogeneous sphere ) which makes the energy @xmath283 diverge to @xmath435 , the above arguments prove that the exact functional @xmath436 $ ] given by eq . ( [ wkre ] ) has no absolute minimum at fixed mass for @xmath429 . since the functional @xmath324 $ ] has only one critical point ( cancelling the first variations ) at fixed mass , we conclude that , for @xmath429 , this critical point is a saddle point . therefore , there is no stable steady state of polytropic spheres for @xmath429 . for the critical index @xmath300 , the relation ( [ dim3 ] ) shows the existence of a critical mass @xmath437 the functional ( [ dim1 ] ) can be rewritten @xmath438 for @xmath251 , @xmath439 for all @xmath63 ( at equilibrium @xmath421 ) . this determines an infinite family of solutions with the same mass @xmath13 and different radii . these solutions have the same energy and are marginally stable . this returns the result of the exact model where the configurations are solution of the lane - emden equation ( see sec . [ sec_eigen ] ) . for @xmath249 , the function @xmath425 is monotonically decreasing with @xmath63 ( so the system tends to evaporate ) : for @xmath103 , @xmath425 goes from @xmath347 to @xmath435 and for @xmath90 , @xmath425 goes from @xmath440 to @xmath347 . for @xmath14 , the function @xmath425 is monotonically increasing with @xmath63 ( so the system tends to collapse ) : for @xmath103 , @xmath425 goes from @xmath347 to @xmath440 and for @xmath90 , @xmath425 goes from @xmath435 to @xmath347 . we can obtain a simple dynamical model by using the virial theorem ( [ vir1 ] ) . at equilibrium ( @xmath390 ) , we have @xmath441 inserting the expressions ( [ dim1a ] ) and ( [ dim1b ] ) in eq . ( [ dim6 ] ) , we recover the mass - radius relation ( [ dim3 ] ) . for @xmath296 and for any given mass @xmath102 , there is only one steady state . its radius @xmath106 given by eq . ( [ dim3 ] ) and its energy @xmath442 is given by eq . ( [ stab22 ] ) . it corresponds to the extremum value of @xmath425 . estimating the moment of inertia by @xmath443 and inserting the expressions ( [ dim1a ] ) and ( [ dim1b ] ) in eq . ( [ vir2b ] ) , we obtain @xmath444 this equation determines the evolution of the radius of the star for a fixed mass @xmath102 and a fixed energy @xmath283 . the evolution of the kinetic energy is then given by @xmath445 . the solution of eq . ( [ dim8 ] ) depends on two control parameters @xmath102 and @xmath283 and on the initial condition @xmath446 and @xmath447 . we shall consider the case where @xmath283 is equal to the value @xmath442 corresponding to the steady state , such that the r.h.s . of the above equation is equal to zero at equilibrium . then , we can rewrite eq . ( [ dim8 ] ) as @xmath448 where @xmath106 is the radius of the star at equilibrium . since the dynamics is non - dissipative , in the euler equation ( [ stab2 ] ) @xcite . in that case @xmath449 , so that the system evolves so as to minimize the functional @xmath321 $ ] at fixed mass . ] the system does not evolve towards the minimum of @xmath425 ( unless @xmath450 initially ) . the system can either oscillate around the minimum ( stable ) or evolve away from it ( unstable ) . considering small perturbations around equilibrium , writing @xmath451 with @xmath452 , and linearizing the foregoing equation , we obtain @xmath453 where we have used the mass - radius relation ( [ dim3 ] ) to simplify the expression . this is the equation for a harmonic oscillator with pulsation @xmath454 the star is stable if @xmath455 and unstable otherwise . this returns the exact stability criterion ( [ stab12 ] ) . furthermore , using eqs . ( [ dim1b ] ) and ( [ dim7 ] ) , the pulsation can be rewritten in the form @xmath456 which exactly coincides with the ledoux formula ( [ stab17 ] ) . therefore , our simple dimensional model allows to obtain a lot of interesting results . the case of arbitrary perturbations around equilibrium will be considered in a future work . finally , we note that for @xmath300 , eq . ( [ dim8 ] ) becomes @xmath457 and eq . ( [ dim9 ] ) corresponds to @xmath333 and @xmath251 yielding @xmath458 . hence , @xmath459 corresponding to a marginal evolution . in our dimensional analysis , the constants @xmath181 , @xmath183 and @xmath326 are dimensionless parameters that could be chosen to fit the exact results at best . alternatively , we can try to obtain quantitative predictions by calculating their values for homogeneous spheres . this yields @xmath460 note that the potential energy of a homogeneous sphere in @xmath1 dimensions can be easily calculated from eq . ( [ stab19e ] ) . on the other hand , in @xmath3 , a direct calculation gives @xmath461 where @xmath462 is a reference radius where @xmath463 . all the results given above pass to the limit @xmath185 provided that we take @xmath464 . using eq . ( [ dim1c ] ) , we find that the approximate value of the pulsation ( [ dim11 ] ) becomes @xmath465 on the other hand , if we compare the approximate mass - radius relation ( [ dim3 ] ) with the exact mass - radius relation ( [ dim13 ] ) , we obtain an estimate of the constant @xmath466 in the form @xmath467 this has to be compared with the exact value ( [ dim15 ] ) given in terms of the solution @xmath299 of the emden equation of index @xmath186 in @xmath1 dimensions @xcite . let us consider the case @xmath4 . for @xmath10 , corresponding to classical white dwarf stars , we find @xmath468 instead of the exact value @xmath469 . for @xmath12 , corresponding to relativistic white dwarf stars , we find @xmath470 instead of the exact value @xmath471 this suggests that the homogeneous star model will provide a fair description of relativisitic white dwarf stars and a poorer description of classical white dwarf stars . we shall come back to these different issues ( static and dynamics ) in a future work . in this appendix , we show that the condition of thermodynamical stability in the canonical ensemble is equivalent to the condition of nonlinear dynamical stability with respect to the barotropic euler - poisson system . we apply this result to white dwarf stars . we consider a barotropic gas with an equation of state @xmath278 described by the euler - poisson system @xcite . we introduce the energy functional @xmath472 the first term @xmath473 is the work @xmath474 done in compressing the system from infinite dilution , the second term @xmath475 is the gravitational energy and the third term @xmath476 is the kinetic energy associated with the mean motion . for a gas in local thermodynamic equilibrium , the equation of state is @xmath477 or @xmath478 and the first law of thermodynamics can be written @xmath479 where @xmath480 is the entropy density and @xmath481 is the density of internal energy . for a gas without interaction ( apart from the long - range gravitational attraction ) , the internal energy is equal to the kinetic energy . there are two important cases where the gas is barotropic . the first case is when @xmath482 . this concerns either adiabatic ( or isentropic ) fluids so that @xmath483 or fluids at zero temperature so that @xmath0 . when @xmath482 , the first law of thermodynamics reduces to @xmath484 . it can be integrated into @xmath485d\rho'$ ] . then , the work @xmath473 done by the pressure force ( first term in eq . ( [ ef1 ] ) ) coincides with the internal energy @xmath486 of the gas . in that case , we get @xmath487 and the energy functional ( [ ef1 ] ) can be written @xmath488 thus , at @xmath0 or for an adiabatic evolution , the total energy of the gas @xmath202 is conserved by the euler - poisson system ( since @xmath283 is conserved ) . alternatively , for an isothermal gas @xmath489 , the first law of thermodynamics @xmath479 can be written @xmath490 . it can be integrated into @xmath491d\rho'$ ] . therefore , the work @xmath473 done by the pressure force ( first term in eq . ( [ ef1 ] ) ) coincides with the free energy @xmath492 of the gas . in that case , we get @xmath493 and the energy functional ( [ ef1 ] ) can be written @xmath494 thus , for an isothermal evolution , the free energy of the system @xmath495 is conserved by the euler - poisson system ( since @xmath283 is conserved ) . at @xmath0 , we recover the conservation of the energy @xmath202 . let us apply these results to white dwarf stars . we can view a white dwarf star as a barotropic gas described by an equation of state @xmath278 . according to the discussion of appendix [ sec_eigen ] ( see also @xcite ) , it is nonlinearly dynamically stable with respect to the euler - poisson system if it is a minimum of the energy functional @xmath283 at fixed mass . if a minimum exists , it is necessary that @xmath496 . as a result , a steady state of the euler - poisson system is nonlinearly dynamically stable if , and only if , it is a minimum of @xmath497={\cal w}[\rho,{\bf u}]-\theta[{\bf u}]$ ] at fixed mass @xmath102 . in conclusion , the condition of nonlinear dynamical stability can be written @xmath498\quad |\quad m[\rho]=m\rbrace . \label{ef4}\ ] ] for a white dwarf star at zero temperature ( @xmath0 ) , according to eqs . ( [ ef2 ] ) and ( [ ef3 ] ) , the functional @xmath499 reduces to the energy @xmath500 , where @xmath486 is the kinetic energy . we can also view a white dwarf star as a gas of self - gravitating relativistic fermions at statistical equilibrium in the canonical ensemble . it is thermodynamically stable if , and only if , it is a minimum of free energy @xmath495 at fixed mass @xmath102 . the free energy is given by @xmath501 where @xmath502 is the maximum value of the distribution function fixed by the pauli exclusion principle . for a white dwarf star at zero temperature ( @xmath0 ) , the free energy @xmath495 reduces to the energy @xmath500 . the condition of thermodynamical stability in the canonical ensemble can be written @xmath503\quad |\quad m[f]=m\rbrace . \label{ef6}\ ] ] the critical points of free energy at fixed mass , determined by the variational principle @xmath504 , correspond to the relativistic mean - field fermi - dirac distribution @xmath505 where @xmath506 is a lagrange multiplier ( related to @xmath326 ) determined by the mass @xmath102 and @xmath28 is given by eq . ( [ es3 ] ) . using eqs . ( [ es1 ] ) , ( [ es4 ] ) and ( [ ef7 ] ) , the density and the pressure are of the form @xmath507 and @xmath508 . eliminating @xmath509 between these two expressions , we find that @xmath278 so that the gas is barotropic . the equation of state is parameterized by @xmath229 and is fully determined by the entropic functional in eq . ( [ ef5 ] ) , which is here the fermi - dirac entropy . at @xmath0 we obtain the explicit relations of sec . [ sec_es ] . furthermore , the condition that @xmath510 is a function of the energy @xmath511 implies that the corresponding barotropic gas is at hydrostatic equilibrium . indeed , using eq . ( [ es5 ] ) , @xmath512 so that @xmath513 the relativistic mean - field fermi - dirac distribution ( [ ef7 ] ) is just a critical point of free energy at fixed mass @xmath102 . to determine whether it corresponds to a true minimum of free energy , we can proceed in two steps . we first minimize @xmath514 $ ] for a fixed density profile @xmath515 . since the potential energy @xmath516 $ ] and the mass @xmath322 $ ] are entirely determined by the density profile , this is equivalent to minimizing @xmath517-ts[f]$ ] at fixed @xmath515 , where @xmath486 is the kinetic energy . this gives a distribution @xmath518 where @xmath519 is a local lagrange multiplier determined by the density @xmath515 , using @xmath520 . since @xmath521 , the distribution ( [ ef8 ] ) is a true minimum of @xmath514 $ ] at fixed @xmath515 . substituting the optimal distribution function ( [ ef8 ] ) in eq . ( [ ef5 ] ) , we obtain a functional @xmath522\equiv f[\tilde{f}]$ ] of the density @xmath515 . using eqs . ( [ es1 ] ) , ( [ es4 ] ) and ( [ ef8 ] ) , we note that the density and the pressure are of the form @xmath523 and @xmath524 . eliminating @xmath519 between these expressions , we find that @xmath278 where the equation of state is the same as the one determined from the fermi - dirac distribution ( [ ef7 ] ) at equilibrium . now , we can show that @xmath525=\tilde{\cal w}[\rho ] , \label{ef9}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath526 $ ] is the functional defined in sec . [ sec_efa ] . the relation ( [ ef9 ] ) can be obtained by an explicit calculation which extends the proof given in appendix b of @xcite for classical particles ( this will be shown in a future work ; see also particular cases in sec . [ sec_efc ] ) but it also results from a straightforward argument . we note that the distribution function ( [ ef8 ] ) corresponds to a condition of local thermodynamical equilibrium with uniform temperature and zero average velocity . thus , it locally satisfies the first law of thermodynamic @xmath479 with @xmath489 . integrating this relation like in sec . [ sec_efa ] , we find that @xmath527-ts[\rho]={\cal w}_{1}[\rho]$ ] where @xmath527=u[\tilde{f}]$ ] and @xmath528=s[\tilde{f}]$ ] . this directly yields the identity ( [ ef9 ] ) . we can now conclude that @xmath514 $ ] has a minimum @xmath529 at fixed mass @xmath102 if , and only if , @xmath522=\tilde { \cal w}[\rho]$ ] has a minimum @xmath530 at fixed mass @xmath102 . in that case , @xmath529 is given by eq . ( [ ef8 ] ) where @xmath531 is determined by @xmath530 , writing @xmath532 . therefore , a system is thermodynamically stable in the canonical ensemble if , and only if , the corresponding barotropic gas with the same equilibrium distribution is nonlinearly dynamically stable with respect to the barotropic euler - poisson system . said differently , a system that minimizes the functional ( [ ef9 ] ) is ( i ) thermodynamically stable in the canonical ensemble and ( ii ) nonlinearly dynamically stable with respect to the barotropic euler - poisson system . this result applies to white dwarf stars at arbitrary temperature . although the above results are general , it may be useful to explicitly compute the functionals ( [ ef1 ] ) and ( [ ef5 ] ) for white dwarf stars at @xmath0 and check the relation ( [ ef9 ] ) . if we view a white dwarf star as a barotropic gas described by an equation of state @xmath533 , its energy @xmath499 can be written @xmath534 with @xmath535 a white dwarf star is nonlinearly dynamically stable with respect to the euler - poisson system if it is a minimum of @xmath499 at fixed mass @xmath102 . at @xmath0 , the equation of state is given by eq . ( [ es7 ] ) . in the classical limit ( polytrope @xmath87 ) we have @xmath536 and in the ultra - relativisitic limit ( polytrope @xmath127 ) we have @xmath537 in the general case , ( [ es7 ] ) , the function ( [ ef11 ] ) can be written @xmath538 integrating by parts and using eqs . ( [ es8 ] ) and ( [ es9 ] ) , we find after straightforward calculations that @xmath539 alternatively , we can view a white dwarf star as a gas of self - gravitating relativistic fermions at statistical equilibrium in the canonical ensemble . at @xmath0 , its free energy @xmath230 coincides with its energy @xmath202 . using eq . ( [ ef5 ] ) , it is given by @xmath540 with @xmath541 a white dwarf star at @xmath0 is thermodynamically stable if it is a minimum of the energy @xmath202 at fixed mass @xmath102 . in the classical limit , @xmath542 and @xmath543 so @xmath544 therefore , the free energy can be written @xmath545 using eq . ( [ class1 ] ) , this is equivalent to eq . ( [ ef12 ] ) . in the ultra - relativistic limit , @xmath546 and @xmath547 so @xmath548 . therefore , the free energy can be written @xmath549 using eq . ( [ ur1 ] ) , this is equivalent to eq . ( [ ef13 ] ) . in the general case , we have @xmath550 using eq . ( [ es3 ] ) , it can be put in the form @xmath551 now , it is straightforward to check that the two expressions in the r.h.s . ( [ ef15 ] ) and ( [ ef21 ] ) are equal so that @xmath552 implying the relation ( [ ef9 ] ) . finally , if we consider a classical isothermal self - gravitating gas at temperature @xmath229 with an equation of state @xmath286 , its free energy ( [ ef5 ] ) can be written @xmath553 comparing with eq . ( [ qw3 ] ) , we find that relation ( [ ef9 ] ) is indeed satisfied . therefore , a classical isothermal self - gravitating gas that minimizes the functional ( [ qw3 ] ) or ( [ ef22 ] ) at fixed mass is ( i ) thermodynamically stable in the canonical ensemble and ( ii ) nonlinearly dynamically stable with respect to the barotropic euler - poisson system . we had already made this observation in @xcite . in @xcite , this result was extended to an arbitrary form of entropic functional , including the fermi - dirac entropy , for non - relativistic systems . the present paper shows that , due to relation ( [ ef9 ] ) , the equivalence between nonlinear dynamical stability with respect to the barotropic euler - poisson system and thermodynamical stability in the canonical ensemble is general . if we consider , in a @xmath1-dimensional universe , a hamiltonian system of self - gravitating classical point masses whose dynamics is described by the newton equations @xmath554 the scalar virial theorem reads @xcite : @xmath555 where @xmath176 is the kinetic energy and @xmath556 the trace of the potential energy tensor for the @xmath178-body system @xcite . for @xmath184 , using eq . ( [ stab18 ] ) and introducing the total energy @xmath198 , which is a constant of the motion for an isolated system , we have @xcite : @xmath557 we note that the dimension @xmath6 is critical . in that case , @xmath558 which yields after integration @xmath559 . for @xmath560 , @xmath561 indicating that the system evaporates . for @xmath562 , @xmath563 goes to zero in a finite time , indicating that the system forms a dirac peak ( `` black hole '' ) in a finite time . more generally , for @xmath8 , since @xmath564 , we have @xmath565 so that the system forms a dirac peak in a finite time if @xmath562 . therefore , self - gravitating systems with @xmath562 are not stable in a space of dimension @xmath8 . the study of the present paper indicates that this observation remains true if quantum ( pauli exclusion principle for fermions ) and relativistic effects are taken into account . in this sense , a universe with @xmath8 is not viable . Abstract:
[ "we derive the mass - radius relation of relativistic white dwarf stars ( modeled as a self - gravitating degenerate fermi gas at @xmath0 ) in a @xmath1-dimensional universe and study the influence of the dimension of space on the laws of physics when we combine quantum mechanics , special relativity and gravity . we exhibit characteristic dimensions @xmath2 , @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 , @xmath7 and show that quantum mechanics can not balance gravitational collapse for @xmath8 . this is similar to a result found by ehrenfest ( 1917 ) at the atomic level for coulomb forces ( in bohr s model ) and for the kepler problem . this makes the dimension of our universe @xmath4 very particular with possible implications regarding the anthropic principle . we discuss some historic aspects concerning the discovery of the chandrasekhar ( 1931 ) limiting mass in relation to previous investigations by anderson ( 1929 ) and stoner ( 1930 ) . we also propose different derivations of the stability limits of polytropic distributions and consider their application to classical and relativistic white dwarf stars ." ]
12,998
12,998
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in our previous paper @xcite , we extended the notion of vassiliev invariant and other invariants associated with chern simons theory to the context of spin networks @xcite . we showed that these invariants are loop differentiable in the sense of distributions and we defined an infinitesimal generator of diffeomorphisms in terms of the loop derivative . the generator correctly annihilates diffeomorphism invariant states . in this paper we will introduce a hamiltonian constraint based on the loop derivative . we will limit the discussion to invariants of trivalent vertices and will only concentrate on the `` euclidean '' part of the hamiltonian constraint in the sense of barbero @xcite and thiemann @xcite . limiting ourselves to trivalent intersections is clearly unphysical since the volume operator identically vanishes on such states . however , the essence of most calculations is already present with trivalent intersections and the calculational difficulty is significantly lower than with four or higher valent intersections . we will come back to this issue in the discussion section where we will highlight which results are quite plausibly going to survive when one goes to higher valent intersections . we will then extend the space of invariants through the construction of `` habitats '' such that the resulting states are not diffeomorphism invariant . based on these states we will check the consistency of the quantum commutator algebra of diffeomorphisms and hamiltonian . we will show that there are no anomalies , therefore constituting a consistent theory of canonical quantum gravity . we will start in the next section by introducing the hamiltonian constraint of quantum gravity in terms of the loop derivative . this derivation will be `` generic '' in the sense that we will motivate it through formal manipulations of the loop transform and therefore will not make specific assumptions about the quantum state in the connection representation on which the operator is acting upon . without being more precise about the space of states upon which it acts , we can not guarantee that the operator is well defined . we will show that on several spaces related to the vassiliev invariants the operator is indeed well defined . the results obtained will be later applied in specific `` habitats '' in which we will show that the operators exist and we can compute correctly the commutators . this we will discuss in section iii . the need to introduce new ( non - diffeomorphism - invariant ) `` habitats '' is based on the fact that the spaces we have considered in the companion paper are all diffeomorphism invariant and therefore one can not explore in a non - trivial way commutators involving the diffeomorphisms . we will introduce an explicit example of such a habitat in detail , the `` functions with marked vertices '' . in the end we will see that we will be able to recover the classical poisson algebra at the level of quantum commutators , but there will be subtle issues involved in the definition of the right hand side of the commutator of two hamiltonians , which we will discuss in detail . the last section will be devoted to discussing the implications of the level of consistency achieved by the theory . we wish to introduce a quantum version of the hamiltonian constraint of canonical general relativity . following thiemann @xcite , one can construct this operator introducing the real version of the ashtekar variables first discussed by barbero @xcite . in this formulation , the canonical pair consists of a set of ( densitized ) triads @xmath0 and as conjugate variables real - valued @xmath1 connections @xmath2 . the hamiltonian constraint of canonical , real , lorentzian general relativity in this framework consists of two terms , @xmath3 where @xmath4 in these expressions , @xmath5 is the newton constant and in ( [ k ] ) @xmath6 means that the smearing function @xmath7 is unity . this remarkable formulation implies that the hamiltonian constraint is composed by two terms . the first one , @xmath8 , coincides with the hamiltonian constraint one would obtain in a canonical formulation of general relativity on a manifold of euclidean signature . the lorentzian theory is therefore attained through the addition of an extra term . both terms are given as expressions involving the poisson bracket of a connection with the volume of the space @xmath9 and with the function @xmath10 . the latter can be in turn obtained as a poisson bracket of the euclidean part of the hamiltonian constraint with the volume . in this paper we will only concentrate on realizing at a quantum mechanical level the euclidean part of the hamiltonian . if the reader wishes , we are considering canonical quantum gravity in the euclidean context . however , it should be noticed that the additional term in the hamiltonian is obtained by successive commutators of the operator we will consider , with the volume operator . this suggests that one could generalize our construction to the lorentzian case rather straightforwardly , but this has not been studied in detail . the work of thiemann also shows that similar structures arise if one couples the theory to matter . we will in this paper only concentrate on the vacuum case but again one does not see a priori impediments to extend our treatment to general relativity coupled to matter . to implement the hamiltonian constraint we will partially use the same procedure proposed by thiemann . we will not describe it again in full detail here , we just list some of the salient features . one starts by writing the classical expression ( [ hame ] ) as @xmath11 f_\epsilon(y , x)\ ] ] where @xmath12 is a regularization of the dirac delta function , i.e. @xmath13 . strictly speaking , this expression is only gauge invariant in the limit , so to preserve gauge invariance in the regularization procedure we will `` join '' the @xmath14 with the connection using an infinitesimal piece of holonomy @xmath15 along an arbitrary path @xmath16 going from @xmath17 to @xmath18 , which tends to the null path in the limit @xmath19 . to unclutter the notation we will therefore denote @xmath20 , @xmath21 f_\epsilon(y , x ) \label{uno}\ ] ] in order to prepare the classical expression for quantization , we triangulate the space - like hypersurface @xmath22 in terms of elementary tetrahedra @xmath23 . the triangulation has the following properties : we select a finite set of distinct points of @xmath22 , denoted as @xmath24 . at each of these points we choose three independent directions @xmath25 and construct the eight tetrahedra with vertex @xmath26 and edges @xmath27 , with @xmath28 . the eight tetrahedra saturating @xmath26 define a closed region @xmath29 of length scale @xmath30 . the remaining region @xmath31 is triangulated by arbitrary tetrahedra @xmath32 . the motivation for this peculiar discretization is that when we promote the classical expression to a quantum operator , we will adapt the triangulation to the spin network of the state in question by choosing the points @xmath26 to coincide with the vertices of the spin network . in terms of this triangulation of space we can write equation ( [ uno ] ) in the form , @xmath33 f_\diamond(y)\,,\label{hamt}\ ] ] where the regions @xmath34 indicate either a box @xmath29 or a tetrahedron @xmath32 , and @xmath35 is any point interior to @xmath34 . conventionally we will choose for the boxes @xmath36 , and for the tetrahedra @xmath37 will represent one of its vertices . to discretize the integral we have introduced the volume of each region @xmath38 , @xmath39 where @xmath40 if @xmath41 , and @xmath42 if @xmath43 . in this last case , the @xmath44 s represent the edges of the tetrahedra @xmath32 adjacent to @xmath37 . we also have adapted the regularization of the dirac delta function to the tetrahedral decomposition by defining , @xmath45 where @xmath46 is one if @xmath47 and zero otherwise . we now replace in ( [ hamt ] ) the @xmath48 using formula ( [ vol ] ) and we represent @xmath49 using a holonomy in the fundamental representation along the edge @xmath50 of the triangulation , @xmath51f_\diamond(y)\ , , \label{classham}\ ] ] and we retraced the path described by the holonomy to preserve gauge invariance . it should be noticed that this retracing does not contribute to the expression at leading order in @xmath30 ( the scale parameter of the regions @xmath34 ) . we will now proceed to study the quantization of the last expression . for that we need to `` adapt '' the triangulation we introduced to a spin network state @xmath52 @xcite . let @xmath53 be the set of vertices of the spin network and let @xmath54 be the triples of non - coplanar edges incident at @xmath55 ( @xmath56 , being @xmath57 the number of such triples ) . to adapt the triangulation to the spin network state we perform two operations : first we identify the points @xmath26 of the boxes @xmath29 with the vertices @xmath55 and second , given a triple of edges @xmath54 incident at @xmath55 , we orientate the three unit vectors @xmath58 along the tangents of the edges at @xmath55 . then we can write , @xmath59 to simplify the notation we identify from now on @xmath60 . as in the previous paper , we assume we are acting on a state given by a loop transform , @xmath61 w_a[s]\ , , \label{states}\ ] ] and we realize the hamiltonian operator over the spin network wavefunctions by promoting the classical expression ( [ classham ] ) as an operator acting on the wilson net appearing in the loop transform , very much as we did in the companion paper when we discussed the diffeomorphism operator , @xmath62 \right)f_{\box_v}(y ) w_a(s)\,.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] a first observation is that the volume operator has non - vanishing contributions only at the vertices of the spin net , so we replace the sum in the hamiltonian over all @xmath34 s by a sum over all the vertices of the spin net . the second observation is that , for an n - valent vertex , we have taken the average over all the non - coplanar triples of edges associated with this vertex . finally notice that only one of the terms in the commutator contributes , that with the volume operator on the left . the one with the volume operator on the right vanishes since it is proportional to the trace of the lie algebra element @xmath63 . let us now consider a generic @xmath64valent vertex and study the action of the operator on the wilson net . we assume that the holonomies are all outgoing from @xmath26 . schematically , we are trying to represent the action of @xmath65 , with @xmath66 a generic edge of spin @xmath67 incident at @xmath26 . an @xmath64valent vertex is characterized by an intertwiner that can be represented through a vector @xmath68 of @xmath69 of irreducible representations . the factor @xmath70 acts by adding a line of spin @xmath71 ingoing from the vertex @xmath26 and parallel to the line @xmath66 , @xmath72 notice that the insertion of the holonomy leaves a wilson net that is not gauge invariant anymore , we represent this by keeping the group indices @xmath73 in the diagram . if one was acting on an @xmath64valent vertex characterized by an intertwiner @xmath68 , this leaves an @xmath74valent vertex characterized by intertwiners @xmath75 ; @xmath67 being in the diagram the spin of the line connecting the original vertex to the point ( infinitesimally nearby ) where the holonomy was inserted . notice that @xmath67 coincides with the spin of the original line @xmath66 . we denote that the line is infinitesimally close by the dashed circle . we now act with the volume operator . for that we first have to reduce the product of holonomies associated with @xmath66 to a superposition of irreducible representations . this procedure defines a new intertwiner for the vertex @xmath26 over which the action of the volume operator is well - defined , @xmath76 the action of the volume operator can be represented by a matrix that rearranges the intertwining of the vertex . this matrix elements would depend also on the spins of the external edges of the vertex ( notice that @xmath10 is the color of one of this external edges ) . schematically , @xmath77 where in the last step we reduce the line of spin @xmath71 of the holonomy using recoupling theory . one is left with a double insertion at the vertex , which we can rearrange via recoupling , since everything is happening infinitesimally close to the vertex . we write the result in the following way , @xmath78 the above expression has now to be contracted with @xmath14 at the open strands labeled with @xmath79 and @xmath80 . one can generate @xmath14 by introducing an extension of the idea of loop derivative for spin networks . the reason why one does not simply recover the ordinary loop derivative is that the edge before and after the point of the insertion of @xmath14 are in general in different representations @xmath67 and @xmath81 . the ordinary loop derivative inserts an @xmath14 without changing the representation of the original line . this definition of loop derivative appeared as natural in the context of loops , however in terms of spin networks one expects in general to have a situation like the one we have here . one can use the same set of constructions we did for the ordinary loop derivative of the invariant @xmath82 to compute the action of this generalized loop derivative is proportional to the inverse of the coupling constant of chern - simons theory . for a definition of the invariant @xmath82 , see the companion paper , section ii.c . ] . however , we will not pursue the exploration of this generalized derivative in this paper . instead we will concentrate on the case of trivalent intersections . if the spin networks considered have trivalent intersections , when we repeat the construction we did above , the representations of the edges before and after the insertion of @xmath14 are the same . the operator we then obtain to represent @xmath14 corresponds in this case to the ordinary loop derivative . we have now to consider the action of the volume operator over a four - valent vertex with only three real edges @xcite , @xmath83 with @xmath84 where @xmath85 , and @xmath86 . using this result , the matrix elements of equation ( [ nval ] ) are reduced to the following simple expression for trivalent vertices ( @xmath87 in this case ) , @xmath88 where @xmath89 , and @xmath90 and @xmath91 are the other spins of the edges incident at the trivalent vertex . therefore the spin of the link going from the intersection to the point of insertion of @xmath14 is unchanged through the action of the volume operator . by inserting the @xmath14 we obtain the final action of the hamiltonian constraint on trivalent vertices , @xmath92 the superscript on the loop derivative denotes at which of the incident edges at the intersection it adds the extra strand @xmath16 . notice that since @xmath93 is summed by the einstein convention , the derivative ends up acting on all edges ( we have abused of the summation convention allowing the index @xmath93 to be repeated three times in the last expression ) . the vector @xmath94 labels the spins of the tree edges of the spin network incident at @xmath26 ( @xmath95 is the spin of the edge @xmath96 ) , and the group factor @xmath97 is given by the expression , @xmath98 where the indices @xmath99 take cyclic values in the set @xmath100 . we have therefore a general expression for the hamiltonian constraint acting on any loop - differentiable wavefunction with support on trivalent spin networks , that bears a relationship with a wavefunction in the connection representation @xmath101 given by ( [ states ] ) . at this point it is worthwhile comparing this action of the hamiltonian constraint we just introduced with the original proposal of a hamiltonian constraint in the loop representation ( doubly densitized ) in terms of loop derivative as introduced in @xcite . such constraint was written in @xcite as , @xmath102 the hamiltonian acted on functions of loops and the operator @xmath103 had the action of re - routing one of the lobes of the partition of the loop determined by the points @xmath104 . we see two fundamental differences with the operator we just introduced . the first one is the re - routing operator @xmath103 . this operator arose in the loop representation to account for the fact that states based on loops in the fundamental representation do not diagonalize operators like the volume . in the spin network context the operator is replaced by the group factors we discussed . more important is the difference concerning density weights . in the hamiltonian in terms of loops we see that one obtains a doubly densitized quantity by considering the product of a dirac delta times the regulator . to understand properly this difference , it is worthwhile considering on which spaces of functions are these operators meant to operate upon . in the hamiltonian in terms of loops one had in mind that the loop derivative was acting on functions of loops such that the result was a smooth function . an example of such functions would be holonomies built with a smooth connection . the resulting expression would then consist of a smooth tensor , @xmath14 , a dirac delta integrated on three dimensional space and , in the limit , a two dimensional dirac delta given by @xmath105 integrated along the two one dimensional integrals . the result is finite but is regularization dependent , since the two dimensional dirac delta has an inverse power of the three dimensional volume in it that is not compensated . if we now turn our attention to the hamiltonian we introduced in this paper , and consider its action on a state of the form @xmath82 , we will see a different behavior . given the action ( companion paper : formulas 71 and 44 ) of the loop derivative on @xmath82 we get , @xmath106 where the extra edge added by the loop derivative starts and ends in the edge @xmath107 and as before , @xmath99 take cyclic values in the set @xmath100 . the reason for this is that if it ended in any other edge incident on the vertex one would ( in the limit @xmath108 ) get zero for the action since one would have an integral repeated over one of the edges contracted with @xmath109 . the action on @xmath110 of the loop derivative that appears in the hamiltonian constraint , for trivalent vertices reduces therefore to a chord diagram . if we evaluate the chord diagram using recoupling identities , we finally get , @xmath111 at this point it is worthwhile continuing the comparison with the doubly densitized case . if we evaluate the integrals involved in the above expression we see that we have six one dimensional integrals and two three dimensional dirac delta functions . in the limit we therefore have a finite result , that is defined independent of the background structures introduced by the regulator @xmath112 . one first performs the integral in @xmath18 , which fixes @xmath113 and then one is left with three one dimensional integrals with three step functions ( two explicit , one present in the @xmath114 ) . the result of the integrals is @xmath115 , which cancels the denominator of the @xmath116 ( @xmath117 ) and one is left with a finite result , that in the limit @xmath108 gives , @xmath118 where @xmath119 is the factor group associated with the vertex @xmath26 . we have introduced a quantum version of thiemann s singly - densitized classical hamiltonian in terms of the loop derivative that has the remarkable following properties : \a ) it has a significant resemblance to the original doubly - densitized hamiltonian proposed in the loop representation @xcite , which in turn closed the constraint algebra formally @xcite . we will discuss the implications of this in the next section . \b ) the hamiltonian introduced is finite on the space of vassiliev invariants we introduced in the previous paper . this happens due to the detailed form in which the loop derivative acts on these states . \c ) the hamiltonian may be well defined on other spaces of states . for instance , on the space of functions of spin nets obtained by considering the wilson nets along smooth holonomies ( the original kind of function that was first considered as loop differentiable ) , it is straightforward that the hamiltonian identically vanishes ( essentially , since the loop derivative is smooth , the integrals that before gained contributions due to the distributional character of the loop derivative now vanish ) . \d ) the last two points show that something surprising is happening here , in the sense that _ we did not construct the hamiltonian in an ad - hoc way to obtain properties b ) and c)_. that is , we introduced a discretization of the singly - densitized hamiltonian and it naturally turned out to be well defined on the vassiliev invariants and to vanish on holonomies of smooth connections . this might be pointing to a certain `` naturalness '' of the vassiliev invariant space in the context of quantum gravity . in spite of the a priori huge ambiguity in the regularization of the singly - densitized hamiltonian , it is difficult to imagine a regularization involving the loop derivative that would not be finite on the vassiliev invariants . in addition , we have not introduced in our construction any ad - hoc `` renormalization '' of the operator to obtain finiteness ( as one had to do in the doubly - densitized case ) . we will now proceed to discuss the issue of the constraint algebra . the operators we introduced are written purely in terms of the loop derivative and integrals along edges of the spin net . one can discuss the successive action of such operators without making specific reference to a space of states on which one is acting upon . such a calculation would be `` formal '' in the sense that terms arising in it could fail to be well defined when acting on particular spaces of states . this is the underlying philosophy of the kind of ( unregulated ) formal calculations some of us undertook in reference @xcite . such an approach can be pursued with the regulated operators we introduce in this paper . the fact that the operators are regulated and that they might act on the space of diffeomorphism invariant states will imply certain departures from the specifics of the calculations of reference @xcite . if one pursues calculations at this level of generality , one can not expect to reproduce the classical poisson algebra at the level of quantum commutators without making some assumptions about the distributional behavior of the various quantities involved in the calculations . one will recover terms that correspond to the classical ones but generically there will be additional terms . when one particularizes to a certain `` habitat '' of wavefunctions , these extra terms in many cases will vanish . however , it is not excluded that on certain habitats pathologies could appear . it would be an interesting exercise to pursue the calculation in general and then particularize to various `` habitats '' . this , however , is a complex and lengthy calculation in terms of loop calculus . we will not attempt a calculation at this level of generality here . in this paper we will concentrate on computing the constraint algebra on a series of habitats on which we recover the classical constraint algebra at the level of quantum commutators . these habitats will include as particular cases spaces of diffeomorphism invariant functions on which the appropriate algebra will be recovered . a point to be addressed when studying the constraint algebra is that , given the action of the hamiltonian constraint we have introduced , if one starts with a function of spin networks , when one acts with a hamiltonian constraint one ends with a more general object . this can be explicitly seen for instance in equation ( [ nu ] ) . what we see is that the result of the action of a hamiltonian on a function of spin networks is a function of spin networks times a `` vertex function '' , that is , a function dependent on the position of the vertex where the hamiltonian acts . if one wishes to compute the constraint algebra , the action of the second operator in the calculation of the algebra therefore takes place on such a space of functions . one can view these functions as simply more general functions of spin networks , since after all the information of the position of the vertices comes with a given spin network . this is possible , but one has to exhibit that dependence -of the vertices on the spin networks- in an explicit enough way that operators like the loop derivative have an appropriate action on such a dependence . one is initially tempted to say that the loop derivative simply ignores the extra factors , since they do not appear to contain an explicit loop dependence . but the position of the vertices depends on the edges of the spin network ( more precisely , a vertex is defined by the intersection point of at least three edges of the net ) , and therefore the vertex function should be affected by the loop derivative operator . to operate with the loop derivative over this kind of functions , we need to make more explicit the implicit functional dependence @xmath120 $ ] of the vertex function . we limit the analysis to the case of trivalent vertices . given three arbitrary open paths @xmath121 ( @xmath122 ) with a common origin @xmath123 , we define the quantity , @xmath124 where @xmath125 denotes generically the three curves @xmath126 , @xmath127 is @xmath128 if @xmath129 and zero otherwise , and @xmath130 is a scalar function defined on the manifold . it is assumed that the three paths are oriented and we denote by the overbar the path in the reversed orientation . we also assume that , starting at @xmath123 , the three curves overlap in a finite segment and then they separate following disjoint paths , as it is shown in the figure . we call @xmath26 the bifurcation point of the three curves . it is immediate to show that , @xmath131 and , @xmath132 the above expressions can be used to calculate the loop derivative of a vertex function . given a vertex of the net with edges @xmath133 , we identify the portion of the curve @xmath121 going form @xmath26 to the end point with the portion of the edge @xmath96 from the vertex to some intermediate point . this automatically guarantees that the point @xmath26 defined through the family of curves @xmath121 coincides with the chosen vertex of the graph . if the end points of the edges @xmath134 lie outside of the ball of radius @xmath30 centered at @xmath26 , then one has the identity @xmath135 . we can now proceed to compute explicitly the loop derivative . for any function @xmath136 we have ( @xcite chapter 1 ) , @xmath137z } f(z).\label{loopder}\ ] ] using this result it is straightforward to calculate the loop derivative of @xmath138 , @xmath139z } m(z ) \theta_{\epsilon}(z - y)\right . \nonumber\\&&\left.+ ( m(z)+m(y ) ) \delta(\epsilon-|z - y| ) \frac{\delta^d_{[b}(y - z)_{a]}}{|z - y|}\right\}.\label{derr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the loop derivative of @xmath140 is evaluated using the above result and the leibniz rule . now that we know how to compute the loop derivative of a vertex function , we can consider the construction of a `` habitat '' of functions of spin networks with marked points of the definite following kind : @xmath141 where @xmath142 is a group factor depending on the spins of the edges incident at @xmath26 . this type of dependence on the vertex is precisely the one that appears in the action of the hamiltonian constraint ( [ hame2 ] ) . in the last identity , we express the relationship between @xmath143 and @xmath144 through an operator @xmath145 . it is clear that , in the limit @xmath19 , one gets as a result a function of the spin network times a function of the vertices and incoming spins , @xmath146 to define the action of the constraints on these kinds of functions we will study the action of the constraints before taking the limit @xmath19 in these expressions in a suitable way . let us start by considering the diffeomorphism constraint , @xmath147\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the second term the diffeomorphism acts on @xmath144 leaving all the factors unaffected . this term is immediate to evaluate ( and in the case of diffeomorphism invariant @xmath144 s vanishes ) , so we will not discuss it further . in order to analyze the first contribution it is convenient to make the following intermediate calculation , @xmath148z } m(z ) \theta_{\epsilon}(z - y)\right . \nonumber\\ & & \left.+(m(z)+m(y ) ) \delta(\epsilon-|z - y|)\frac{\delta^d_{[b}(y - z)_{a]}}{|z - y|}\right\}+ \mbox{\footnotesize{cyclic permutations in $ e_1,e_2,e_3$}},\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used ( [ derr ] ) . in the evaluation of this quantity , the result depends on the order in which the limits are taken . if one takes the limit @xmath19 first , one finds that the diffeomorphism annihilates @xmath149 . this means that @xmath150 . on the other hand , if we take the limit @xmath151 first one gets the result , @xmath152 r_{c}(1,\epsilon , e ) + o(\epsilon),\ ] ] and , @xmath153 with this choice we see that the action of the diffeomorphism is what one would have expected geometrically : it lie - drags the dependence of @xmath91 on the position of the vertex . this action immediately ensures that the action of the diffeomorphism constraint closes the appropriate commutator algebra on the space of functions we are considering , provided @xmath144 is either invariant ( like in the case of the vassiliev invariants ) or is such that the diffeomorphism constraint has the natural geometric action . in the general case , @xmath154 based on these calculations for the diffeomorphism , let us now explore the action of the hamiltonian constraint on the habitat we have been discussing . from ( [ hgen ] ) and ( [ derr ] ) we get ( @xmath155 is now the scale parameter of the triangulation adapted to the spin network ) , @xmath156z } m(z ) \theta_{\epsilon}(z - y)+ ( m(z)+m(y ) ) \delta(\epsilon-|z - y| ) \frac{\delta^d_{[b}(y - z)_{a]}}{|z - y|}\right\ } + \mbox{\footnotesize{cyclic permut . in $ e_1,e_2,e_3$}},\label{hr } \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have written @xmath157 in order to make explicit the dependence of the triangulation with @xmath155 . notice that , @xmath158 and , @xmath159 irrespective of the order in which the limits are taken . this means that , @xmath160 and taking into account ( [ psim ] ) , @xmath161 } h(n)o(m,\omega ) \psi ( s ) = o(m,\omega ) h(n ) \psi(s).\ ] ] this is an important result . it will imply that the hamiltonian constraints will commute with each other . we will discuss this in detail in the next section . in the classical theory , the poisson bracket of two smeared hamiltonian constraints is given by , @xmath162 with the one - form @xmath163 and @xmath164 is the ( unsmeared ) diffeomorphism constraint . that is , the right hand side of this expression is a diffeomorphism generated by the vector obtained by contracting the one - form @xmath165 with a double - contravariant metric . if one wishes this expression to have a quantum counterpart , it implies realizing the product of the doubly contravariant metric times a diffeomorphism as a quantum operator . in order to do this , we need to re - express it in terms of variables that are suitable for the ashtekar formulation . this is done via the following classical identities , as discussed by thiemann @xcite , @xmath166 and we recall the relationship of the covariant ( undensitized ) triads with the more usual contravariant densitized triads , @xmath167 . we can now use the key identity , due to thiemann , @xmath168 to obtain , @xmath169 this expression can not be easily promoted in a direct way to an operator due to the denominators involving the determinant of the metric . we can achieve this noting that the poisson bracket of the connection and the volume depends only on local information of the volume operator in the surrounding of the point @xmath17 . we can therefore replace in the above expression the volume of the whole manifold @xmath9 , by a `` localized '' volume ( as discussed by thiemann @xcite ) @xmath170 , given by , @xmath171 where @xmath172 is an infinitesimal closed region around the point @xmath17 and @xmath173 is the characteristic function associated with this region . the following identity holds , @xmath174 and in addition , @xmath175 where @xmath176 is the euclidean volume of the infinitesimal region @xmath177 given by a fiducial flat metric ( we will see that the final result does not depend on the fiducial metric ) . the above expressions allow us to absorb the denominators involving the determinant of the metric into poisson brackets . using this results we write ( [ metc ] ) in the form , @xmath178 we now discretize the integral introducing the triangulation @xmath179 of space defined in section ii , @xmath180 where we have identified @xmath181 to simplify the notation . using ( [ vol ] ) we replace the @xmath182 and @xmath183 in terms of the volume of the elementary regions and the edges @xmath184 of the tetrahedra , and we join four of the @xmath184 s with the @xmath185 s to construct holonomies along the edges of the triangulation , @xmath186 where we have defined , @xmath187 { \rm tr}[\tau^k h(u_r)\{h^{-1}(u_r),\sqrt{v({\cal{r}}_v)}\ } ] \times \nonumber\\ & & { \rm tr}[\tau^l h(u_t)\{h^{-1}(u_t),\sqrt{v({\cal{r}}_v)}\ } ] { \rm tr}[\tau^m h(u_n)\{h^{-1}(u_n),\sqrt{v({\cal{r}}_v)}\}]\ , . \label{q}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we are now ready to promote the above expression as an operator acting over the spin network wavefunctions , which we assume to be the loop transform of a state in the connection representation . as in the case of the hamiltonian constraint , we adapt the triangulation to the graph of the spin network choosing the points @xmath24 of the boxes @xmath188 coincident with the vertices of the spin network , and we choose the regions @xmath189 equal to that defined by the triangulation around @xmath26 but with a length scale @xmath155 . with this prescriptions we get from ( [ metc2 ] ) , @xmath190 where we have used ( [ tangent ] ) and @xmath191 with @xmath30 the length scale of the regions @xmath29 . the action of the operator @xmath192 on the spin network wavefunctions is calculated as usual through its action on the wilson net appearing in the loop transform . it is important to notice that this operator looses all dependence with the scale parameters involved in the triangulation and the localized volume . this is due to the fact that , acting on the wilson net , the holonomies @xmath193 that appear in the quantum version of ( [ q ] ) generate ( in the limit @xmath194 ) finite recoupling coefficients and that the action of the volume operator is local ( it depends only on the vertex included in the region @xmath195 . with this result at hand it is straightforward to quantize the right hand side of the poisson bracket of two smeared hamiltonian constraints . from the classical expression we immediately write , @xmath196 f_{\delta}(x , y ) \delta_{cb}^{(e)}(\pi_y^x ) \psi(s)\ , , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used the regularized expression of the unsmeared diffeomorphism operator ( see the companion paper , section ii.b ) . introducing now the regularized metric operator we get , @xmath197 \,f_{\delta}(x , y)\times\nonumber\\ & & \int_{e_p } dw^a \theta_{\epsilon}(w;v ) \int_{e_s } dt^b\,\theta_{\epsilon}(t;v ) { q}^{ps}(v)\delta_{cb}^{(e)}(\pi_y^x)\ , \psi(s)\,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] at this point it is worthwhile mentioning that this expression has a regularization ambiguity , given by the two regularization parameters @xmath30 and @xmath155 . the latter was introduced , as we discussed above , in the definition of the localized volume operator . this ambiguity , associated with the fact that the localized volume and the ordinary one are the same on these spaces of functions was first noticed by lewandowski and discussed in @xcite . if one chooses @xmath198 one notices quickly that the expression for the right - hand - side vanishes . the powers @xmath199 cancel and one is left with two integrals along @xmath200 , @xmath201 which are of order @xmath30 each . the rest of the expression is simply the action of a diffeomorphism . assuming that the latter is finite , the expression therefore vanishes . if we trace back the origin of this cancellation , one notices that the expression ( [ metq ] ) for the contravariant metric operator vanishes identically over spin network states of any kind , in particular , the vassiliev invariants we are considering in this paper . this property is a consequence of the following two peculiarities of the quantization of @xmath202 in terms of spin network wavefunctions : the sum over the triangulation reduces to a sum over the vertices of the spin net ( which includes a finite number of terms ) , and in each term the result of @xmath203 is finite . notice that in the classical result ( [ metc ] ) one has an infinite sum of @xmath204 , each of which tends to zero in the limit @xmath205 . this limit gives in general a nonzero result . but in ( [ metq ] ) we have instead a finite sum of terms @xmath203 , which are independent of @xmath30 and @xmath155 . this fact alters the power counting of the factors @xmath30 and @xmath155 in such a way that all the terms tends naturally ( i.e. choosing @xmath198 ) to zero as the triangulation shrinks to a point . that the right - hand - side may vanish was already observed in @xcite . could one `` tune '' the limits in @xmath30 and @xmath155 so this quantity is nonvanishing ? one could , but the result would be dependent on the background structures introduced to regularize . if one made the expression non - vanishing it would be proportional to the normalized tangent vectors at the intersection , which are background dependent . this is not surprising : there is no naturally defined second order symmetric contravariant tensor defined in a manifold without metric . this result is quite strong . it implies that the commutator of two hamiltonians will have to vanish if one wishes to have consistency . we anticipated that this would happen in the previous subsection and we will now see in detail how it happens . as a final remark , we notice that if one wished to define the doubly covariant metric , it is straightforward to compute it using the identities introduced by thiemann and one finds that regularized with the same procedures we followed up to now , it diverges . should one worry about a theory of quantum gravity where the doubly contravariant metric vanishes and the doubly covariant metric diverges ? we will return to this in the discussion section . the loop derivative was originally introduced in the context of yang mills theories , where the natural functions to act upon were holonomies of smooth connections . these functions are not the most natural ones to consider in the context of diffeomorphism invariant theories like general relativity , but our constraints are well defined on them , so we can consider them to be a `` habitat '' where to test the constraint algebra , at least as a mathematical exercise . on these kinds of functions the diffeomorphism constraints that we have introduced here are known to close the appropriate algebra in the limit in which regulators are removed ( see @xcite , although the regularization is slightly different than the one we use in this paper , it is immediate to check that the same calculations go through ) . we therefore will not repeat the calculation here . the hamiltonian constraint vanishes identically on this habitat . starting from equation ( [ hgen ] ) , if the loop derivative is a smooth function , one is left with two one - dimensional integrals along the edges of a cell of a finite function . in the limit in which the triangulation is shrank , the result vanishes . the commutator of a diffeomorphism with a hamiltonian therefore immediately reproduces the classical result . the right - hand side of the commutator of two hamiltonians that we introduced in the previous subsection also vanishes , here one has three one dimensional integrals along the edges of a triangulation of a quantity that goes as @xmath206 . the final result therefore goes as @xmath207 . therefore , as long as one chooses @xmath155 shrinking to zero faster than @xmath208 , the right hand side vanishes . on this space therefore , we reproduce the classical poisson algebra at the level of the commutators . the diffeomorphisms close among themselves and the hamiltonian vanishes identically . could one simply claim that this is the `` right '' habitat to do quantum gravity ? the answer is that this is unlikely . although all states are solutions of the hamiltonian constraint , this space does not contain any solution to the diffeomorphism constraint . solutions to the diffeomorphism constraint in terms of holonomies can only be constructed as infinite superpositions , functional integrals or `` group averaging '' , and in these cases one includes connections that are not smooth . an interesting point is that in this habitat , since one does not have solutions of the diffeomorphism constraint but has solutions to the hamiltonian constraint , the only way that one could achieve consistency in the algebra is if the right hand side of the commutator of two hamiltonians vanishes , which is the case . another point to consider is that if one examines the expression of the commutator of two hamiltonians , although both members vanish in the limit in which one shrinks the triangulation given the smoothness of the loop derivative away from the limit the calculation is problematic . for instance , it is not clear what is the action of the volume operator on a state given by the loop derivative of a smooth holonomy . one might consider introducing a definition of the volume on this kind of space , but this has yet to be done in detail . remarkably , this space of invariants also leads to a reproduction of the classical poisson algebra at a trivial level only ( as usual , we limit our discussion to trivalent intersections ) . this is based on the fact proved in the appendix of the previous paper , that these invariants are annihilated by the loop derivative that appears in both the diffeomorphism and the hamiltonian constraints and of the expression of the rhs . therefore the ambient isotopic ( framing - independent ) vassiliev invariants for spin networks with trivalent intersections are annihilated by all the constraints of quantum gravity and consistently , by the right hand side of the commutator of two hamiltonian constraints . it should be pointed out that the space is in no way trivial : as we discussed in the appendix of the previous paper , the annihilation is a detailed property of the space of vassiliev invariants , related to the decomposition of the invariants in framing independent and framing dependent components and the detailed structure of chord diagrams appearing in the coefficients . hints that the vassiliev invariants for trivalent intersections were annihilated by the hamiltonian constraint were found for the lower invariants in terms of loops @xcite,@xcite , in the lattice @xcite . one could mention as a more trivial example of a space with similar property the states based on diffeomorphism invariants of spin networks with no vertices , which are also trivially annihilated by all the constraints we consider . this is an extension of results also first suggested in the context of loops @xcite . it should be remarked that this property of the loop derivative is not true for higher valence intersections . future extensions of the hamiltonian constraint to higher valence intersections could be tested in this habitat for non - trivial consistency . by this space we mean the invariants that appear in the power series expansion of the expectation value of the wilson net in a chern simons theory in terms of the inverse coupling constant @xmath209 . in particular , the whole series is an example of such an invariant . each coefficient of the series and certain portions of them are also examples . in general , these invariants are sums and products of the independent invariants that appear at each order , both framing - independent and framing - dependent ( see previous paper ) . these states have the important property that the loop derivative that appears in the expressions of the constraints ( which is evaluated on a path @xmath16 of infinitesimal length ) can be rewritten simply as , @xmath210 where @xmath211 is the edge of the spin net containing the point @xmath17 and where the invariant @xmath212 is another vassiliev invariant of one order less than @xmath213 . what happens is that because of the infinitesimal length of @xmath16 one can rearrange the action of the loop derivative in terms of the original spin network @xmath52 using recoupling identities , at the expense of some additional group factors , which we reabsorb notationally in @xmath212 . we will see that we do not need the details of the relation of @xmath213 to @xmath212 for proving the consistency . as usual , all our discussion is limited to trivalent intersections . the relation above implies that for the vassiliev invariants , one can write , @xmath214 this can be seen by considering equation ( [ nu ] ) and recalling that @xmath215 . in particular , we see that the action of the hamiltonian on these states can be written ( up to a constant factor which we will omit for simplicity ) as , @xmath216 on this space , the diffeomorphism constraint vanishes identically , as we discussed in the previous paper . so the algebra of diffeomorphisms is trivially satisfied . nontrivial commutators to be realized will be those of a diffeomorphism with a hamiltonian and that of two hamiltonians . in the case of a diffeomorphism with a hamiltonian , since the wavefunctions are diffeomorphism invariant , of the two terms of the commutator one is left with the one in which the diffeomorphism acts at the left . since the action of the hamiltonian on @xmath213 is not diffeomorphism invariant , one should recover the proper action of the diffeomorphism through such term . here the derivations of section [ marked ] become useful . we start from the expression ( [ honvas ] ) , and then use ( [ diffeoono ] ) to get , @xmath217 and from here the correct commutator follows immediately . this implies that the quantum hamiltonian transforms covariantly in a correct way . this calculation is one of the main differences of our construction with respect to the one of thiemann @xcite , since in that context one does not consider an infinitesimal generator of diffeomorphisms . as we discussed in section [ marked ] , the action of a hamiltonian on a function with marked points as one gets after acting with a hamiltonian on a vassiliev invariant was given by expression ( [ [ ho ] ] ) , which we can combine with the action of the hamiltonian ( [ honvas ] ) to get , @xmath218 and if one performs the calculation in the reverse order , one obtains the @xmath103 operators in the reverse order . however , these operators are multiplicative , so they commute . therefore one has the result , @xmath219 v_n(s)=0,\ ] ] which is the expected commutation relation on states that are invariant under diffeomorphisms . the states we have already considered , where one has a vassiliev invariant times a scalar function that depends on the position of the vertices of the spin network , are an attractive habitat where the diffeomorphism constraint does not vanish . as discussed in section ( [ marked ] ) the diffeomorphisms on these states reduce to lie dragging of the scalar functions of the vertices ( see formula ( [ diffeoono ] ) ) . since they correspond to a natural geometric action , the consistency of the algebra of diffeomorphisms is immediate . we start from the action of a hamiltonian on these kinds of states , @xmath220 where we have used the fact that @xmath221 and @xmath222 commute and that the action of the hamiltonian on these states produces a vassiliev invariant of order lowered by one unit times a vertex function . we now act with a diffeomorphism , @xmath223 and now use the fact that leibniz rule applies to the action of the diffeomorphism constraint ( stemming from the fact that it also applies to the action of the loop derivative ) , @xmath224 and we now reconstruct the hamiltonian in the first and second terms , @xmath225 and using the fact that @xmath222 and @xmath221 commute , we get , @xmath226 which we can rewrite as , @xmath227 from where we get the correct commutation relation , @xmath228 o(m,\omega ) v_n = h(l^a \partial_a n ) o(m,\omega ) v_{n}.\ ] ] this calculation proceeds along the same lines as the one in the previous subsection , we essentially rewrite the action of the hamiltonian in terms of the @xmath221 operator , and note that the @xmath221 operators commute , @xmath229 and we therefore get that @xmath230=0 $ ] , which as we discussed before , is consistent with the representation in these spaces of functions of the right hand side of the quantum commutator . we have presented a canonical quantization of the constraints of canonical general relativity . we represented the diffeomorphism and hamiltonian constraints using two novel ingredients : the loop derivative to represent the field tensor @xmath14 and the use of spaces related to the generalization of the vassiliev invariants to spin networks ( restricted to trivalent intersections ) as wavefunctions . in terms of the latter we constructed several `` habitats '' , including spaces of functions that are not invariant under diffeomorphisms and we checked that one obtained a consistent algebra of quantum commutators of the constraints . consistency in this sense implies that the quantization of the canonical poisson identities between the classical constraints is implemented correctly in the quantization . we have observed that this consistency is achieved at the price of having a vanishing right hand - side for the commutator of two hamiltonians and that we can trace back this fact to the vanishing nature of the doubly covariant metric operator in these spaces of functions . we should point out common elements and differences with the quantization presented by thiemann @xcite . in thiemann s case the hamiltonian was implemented on the space of diffeomorphism invariant cylindrical functions of spin networks . on these spaces one does not have a well defined notion of the field tensor @xmath14 and the functions are not loop - differentiable . in our case , the availability of the loop derivatives allows to have at hand a `` differential calculus '' that allows for several novel constructions . examples of them are the calculations performed in computing the constraint algebra , and the possibility of finding novel solutions to the hamiltonian constraint , based on the behavior of the vassiliev invariants under loop differentiation . another difference involves the implementation of an infinitesimal generator of diffeomorphisms . in thiemann s original construction one worked directly in terms of diffeomorphism invariant states and therefore one did not have an infinitesimal generator . the construction was extended by lewandowski and marolf @xcite to `` habitats '' that are dependent on diffeomorphisms . with that extension , thiemann s work achieves the same level of consistency that we have in this paper , in the sense that one can check non - trivial commutators of diffeomorphisms and diffeomorphisms with hamiltonians . one still has the feature of a vanishing right hand side of the commutator of two hamiltonians @xcite . as we discussed in this paper , this feature appears as inescapable in the context of wavefunctions only dependent on spin networks as the ones we considered here , since as we mentioned one does not have enough structures to construct a naturally defined symmetric metric tensor . other differences arise insofar as the space of wavefunctions considered . in the case of thiemann , one had spaces of functions with well defined inner products , which allow to discuss normalizability and study the spaces of solutions with a level of rigor that is not available currently in our approach , since we do not have an inner product on the habitats we are considering . it might not be impossible to find a suitable inner product with the same techniques that led to the construction of the measures on the spaces of cylindrical functions , but it has not been achieved yet . concerning solutions of the constraints , one has some available both in our approach and in thiemann s , that appear as quite distinct in their features . in thiemann s approach , the solutions are obtained using group averaging techniques . this leads to structures like `` tassels '' and others @xcite in which accumulation of lines and vertices take place . in our approach , one has a number of solutions of the hamiltonian constraint ( the framing independent vassiliev invariants for trivalent intersections ) that do not depend on such structures . on the other hand , they appear as `` trivial '' solutions in the sense that they may not exist if one considers intersections of higher valences . in our approach one may also construct solutions to the hamiltonian constraint with a cosmological constant , following similar ideas that led to the construction of states in terms of loops @xcite . although we have not pursued this in detail yet , it appears quite plausible that these types of solutions exist , given the structure of the extra term due to the cosmological constant in the hamiltonian constraint in terms of the spin network approach @xcite . thiemann s approach has also been studied in @xmath231 dimensions @xcite , and appears to lead to a satisfactory quantization , provided one chooses in an ad - hoc way an inner product that rules out certain infinite dimensional set of solutions . in a forthcoming paper we will discuss the quantization of @xmath231 dimensional gravity using an approach that has elements in common with the one we pursue here , in particular the requirement of loop differentiability of the states . we will see that this requirement limits us ( at least for low valence intersections ) to the correct solution space in a natural way . the reader might find unsatisfactory that the right hand side of the commutator of two hamiltonians vanishes . even more unsatisfactory may appear the fact that this is due to the vanishing of the doubly covariant metric in this approach to quantum gravity . in this subsection we will address this and other issues . the first question that one may raise is if this is not just a pathology that is introduced by our limitation to trivalent intersections for reasons of calculational convenience . after all , one knows that this subspace in in some sense degenerate since the volume operator vanishes identically . unfortunately , it appears unlikely that extending our results to higher valent intersections ( to which we do not see any technical obstruction , apart from greater calculational complexity ) will change things insofar as the commutator of two hamiltonians . the action of the hamiltonian constraint on higher valent intersections is more complicated largely because the volume operator and the action of the loop derivative can not be reduced to a simple group - dependent prefactor times the original state , but will in general involve a linear combination of states , with a non - trivial group - dependent matrix of coefficients . however , the dependence of the hamiltonian on the smearing function will remain as a multiplicative one . therefore it appears that the commutator of two hamiltonians will again vanish . moreover , the reasons we gave for the vanishing of the right hand side of the commutator are independent of the valences of the intersections of the spin networks . the expression for the doubly - covariant metric will be more complicated , but will still include a prefactor with the same dependence on the regulators as in the trivalent case and it will vanish . one therefore expects consistency at the same level we achieved for the trivalent case . can one consider satisfactory a theory with a vanishing doubly contravariant metric ( and a divergent doubly covariant metric ) ? the answer to this will only appear in a definitive way when one constructs physical predictions from the theory , which at the moment are lacking . one can get partial indications that the pathology might not be as severe as it appears at first sight from the fact that one can define reasonable quantities like areas , volumes and lengths in this framework in spite of having the ill defined metric operators . an attractive feature of the vassiliev states is that other diffeomorphism invariant operators can be defined as well . for instance , if one considers the integral @xmath232 , given that the chern simons states are such that the densitized triads are proportional to the magnetic vector constructed from the curvature , one finds that quantum representation of this integral is identical to the volume operator . an important observation concerning how satisfatory is a theory with a vanishing metric operator like the one we propose is that in @xmath231-dimensional gravity similar pathologies appear , yet the correct physical theory is recovered . if one pursues a quantization similar to thiemann s dimensional gravity along the same lines as the one proposed in this paper , and the observations we make in this subsection apply to it as well . we will also expand the discussion on the physical observables and their connection with the kinematical metric we present in this subsection . ] in @xmath231=dimensions ( this is discussed in detail in @xcite ) one notices that the hamiltonians also commute . moreover , the geometrical arguments leading to the vanishing of the @xmath202 operator still hold in this context : there is no quantity one can build out of loop states that will yield a doubly contravariant symmetric tensor . yet , it was shown in @xcite that one can recover the correct physical theory . how can these apparently contradictory elements be reconciled ? it has to do with the nature of the kinematical calculations we are performing . to check the `` off shell '' contraint algrebra one is required to operate with a kinematial space of wavefunctions that are not annihilated by the constraints . when one recovers `` physics '' one should really do it with states that are annihilated by the constraint . this can be carried out in detail in the @xmath231 dimensional case . suppose one wishes to ask questions about the `` metric '' of the theory . the first observation is that on physical states one can not define a metric tensor since the latter states are diffeomorphism invariant and the metric tensor is not . one could gauge fix a metric tensor , say by asking questions about the value of its components in a fixed coordinate system . these questions can be answered : the components of the metric in a fixed coordinate system can be related to the values of the invariant operators @xmath233 and @xmath234 in such a coordinate system ( and therefore in general , since the latter are coordinate invariant ) . one therefore has well defined operators associated with the metric that can be evaluated in the physical space of states . but such operators have little to do with the @xmath202 we introduced in the kinematical space . it is not obvious at all that the two operators will be related in any way since the former are non - vanishing whereas the latter vanishes identically . there is a certain disquieting element in the last observation , since it seems to imply that one should be careful before drawing conclusions from calculations at a kinematical level . this in particular , implies all calculations involving the constraint algebra . when we set out to work on the current paper , our expectation was that reproducing the contraint algebra would be a strong test for our quantization procedure , that perhaps would rule out all but a few of the possible theories . what we have learned is that this is probably not the correct view on the issue : one can obtain consistency in many ways at a kinematical level ( in particular with @xmath235 ) . one can construct many consistent theories of quantum gravity . and still , what the @xmath231 dimensional example shows is that the `` physics '' of all these theories is really deeply buried in the states that solve the constraints . in a sense this is good , since the theory we are proposing here differs significantly at this level from the one proposed by thiemann and therefore further adds to our options for trying to match experimental results . the observation that kinematical calculations may have quite nontrivial connections with `` real physics '' poses problems for computations that try to obtain heuristic physical insights from looking at properties of the kinematical states ( the `` weave '' approach to the semiclassical theory ) . an example of this are our own results on gamma - ray - burst light dispersion @xcite . from the @xmath231 example we see that quantum fluctuations in the `` physical metric '' ( the ones one would expect to influence the propagation of matter fields ) may not have a direct connection with fluctuations of the kinematical metric . yet it is the latter that are used in the concrete computations of @xcite . concerning the latter point , it is worthwhile mentioning explicitly that the theory presented in this paper can be coupled to matter and have well defined expressions for the hamiltonians of matter fields , which also involve the metric in a non - trivial way ( the coupling of the theory to matter can , for instance , be achieved using the same construction as thiemann @xcite ; or one could consider alternative settings in which the loop derivative is also used in the representation of certain matter fields ) . it is somewhat unfortunate that the remarkable results on black hole entropy that have been achieved within this context @xcite do not involve in a detailed way the action of the hamiltonian constraint in the `` bulk '' of the spacetime to be used as guideline for constructing the constraints , and therefore can not distinguish at the moment our proposal from thiemann s . the vanishing of the doubly contravariant metric tensor , apart from appearing as a `` robust '' feature based only on elementary notions of covariance of the elements involved in constructing the spin network states , is the way in which our approach bypasses the `` hermiticity problem '' of the canonical quantization . as we mentioned , if one were to demand that the diffeomorphism and hamiltonian constraints and the doubly covariant metric be hermitian operators ( since they correspond to real classical quantities ) , the commutator of two hamiltonians ( which is hermitian ) can not be simply equal to the product of a metric times a diffeomorphism ( which is not hermitian ) . one could fix the hermiticity of the right hand side by `` symmetrizing '' the operator , but then one could face an anomaly problem , since the diffeomorphism constraint would not act to the right of the product . this difficulty is bypassed ( in the context of non - diffeomorphism invariant states ) if the metric vanishes . it should be noticed that it is not obvious that one should promote the constraints to hermitian operators , for instance , see @xcite for counterexamples in the context of the quantization of non - unimodular gauge groups . related with the issue of the lack of guidelines to construct the theory is the problem of uniqueness . we already have a manifest non - uniqueness in that the theory presented here and the theory introduced by thiemann appear as both satisfactory yet distinct . the ambiguity is worse than this . even if one stays within one general approach , for instance considering the space of vassiliev invariants as `` arena '' for quantization , there are many ways in which one could implement the hamiltonian constraint . we have not analyzed them in any detail , but some salient features of them are worthwhile mentioning . the ambiguities arise in the various limits involved in constructing the hamiltonian . one of them is associated with the specific action of the loop derivative . the loop derivative is dependent on a path . in this paper we have taken such a path to coincide with one of the lines of the spin network . we then acted with the loop derivative and collapsed its action using recoupling identities . the final action of the hamiltonian was therefore `` ultra - local '' in the sense that it returned a wavefunction with the same vertex structure times a vertex dependent prefactor ( for valences higher than three one gets a linear combination with different spin weights for the intertwiners yet the topology of the vertex is unchanged ) . this may raise concerns that `` super - selections '' could appear in the sense that it could be easy to construct operators that commute with the hamiltonian . one could define a different hamiltonian in a straightforward way , by assuming a different topology for the path associated with the loop derivative . for instance , one could assume that the path starts at the vertex , advances along one of the edges of the spin network and then crosses towards another edge of the spin network along one of the edges of the tetrahedra introduced in the discretization . at the end of the path , the loop derivative acts . one then is left with an action of the hamiltonian resembling the one introduced by thiemann : the constraint produces a vertex dependent prefactor , but it also alters the structure of the spin network by `` adding a line '' at the vertex . a different proposal would be to have a path that starts at the vertex , advances along one of the edges of the spin network , crosses towards another edge along the tetrahedron and then continues to cross towards another edge of the spin network , as shown in figure [ fifi ] . in the first of these proposals ( as in thiemann s ) , the hamiltonian adds vertices called `` exceptional '' in the sense that they are planar vertices . the hamiltonian vanishes identically on such vertices , because the volume vanishes on planar vertices , even if they are four - valent . in the second proposal , the intermediate vertex that is created is non - planar . this might raise hopes that the commutator of two hamiltonians may be less trivial , since the second hamiltonian acts at the newly created vertex , but more careful analyses seem to indicate that the hamiltonians still commute @xcite . if it they were not to commute one would still be faced with how to reproduce a similar vertex structure with the right hand side operator in a natural way . summarizing this portion of the discussion : it appears that there is a non - trivial , possibly infinite , amount of ambiguity in the definition of the theory , that is not significantly constrained by the imposition of the correct quantum commutator algebra . related to the latter point is the fact that due to the vanishing of the metric , the consistency check provided by the commutator of two hamiltonians is less detailed than if one had to prove the equality of non - vanishing operators . we already see that we have two distinct and apparently consistent , quantizations of the constraints ( with several possible variants of each ) . it will require further study to determine if one quantization is `` better '' in the sense of reproducing expected results than the other . one possibility would be to consider the commutation of the hamiltonian with various operators , and study if inconsistencies appear . this procedure , however , might be limited by the fact that most commutators have non - trivial right hand sides which will inevitably involve quite a bit of ambiguity at the time of their quantization . another point that might be raised is that these approaches appear confined to four dimensions and to the einstein - hilbert action , and therefore one may have little hopes of making contact with other approaches , as those based on string theories . these approaches not only may present avenues to understand quantum gravity but they also have the attractive feature of unifying gravity with other interactions , a goal some may consider desirable in itself . it should be pointed out however , that progress is being made @xcite towards describing @xmath236 dimensional general relativity in terms of connections . although constructions like the ones we discussed here have not been pursued in detail in this context , they appear as plausible . to conclude , we have at the moment canonical quantizations of general relativity ( possibly coupled to matter ) that appear as mathematically consistent at the kinematical level at which they have been studied . this level of consistency had never been achieved before in other approaches . further exploration of the consequences of the quantization will be needed to determine if any of them are physically satisfactory theories of the quantum gravitational field . in particular the exploration of the space of states that solve the constraints and how physical quantities can be evaluated on them appears as a natural next step in the quantization program . we wish to thank abhay ashtekar , laurent freidel , john klauder , karel kucha and thomas thiemann for comments and discussions . this work was supported in part by the national science foundation under grants nsf - phy-9423950 , nsf - int-9811610 , nsf - phy-9407194 , research funds of the pennsylvania state university , the eberly family research fund at psu . jp acknowledges support of the alfred p. sloan and john simon guggenheim foundations . we acknowledge support of pedeciba ( uruguay ) . rg and jp wish to thank the institute for theoretical physics of the university of california at santa barbara and cdb , rg and jg the center for gravitational physics and geometry at penn state for hospitality during the completion of this work . c. di bartolo , r. gambini , j. griego , j. pullin `` canonical quantum gravity in the vassiliev invariants arena : i. kinematical structure '' , companion paper . c. rovelli , l. smolin , nucl . phys . * b442 * , 593 ( 1995 ) . j. barbero , phys . rev . * d51 * , 5507 ( 1995 ) . t. thiemann , class . grav . * 15 * , 839 ( 1998 ) . r. borissov , r. de pietri , c. rovelli , class . * 14 * , 2793 ( 1997 ) . t. thiemann , j. math . phys . * 39 * , 3347 ( 1988 ) . r. gambini , phys . lett . * b255 * , 180 ( 1991 ) . r. gambini , a. garat , j. pullin , int . j. mod d4 * , 589 ( 1995 ) . r. gambini , j. pullin `` loops , knots , gauge theories and quantum gravity '' cambridge university press ( 1996 ) . t. thiemann , class . grav . * 15 * , 1207 ( 1998 ) . r. gambini , j. lewandowski , d. marolf , j. pullin , int . * d7 * 97 ( 1997 ) . b. brgmann , r. gambini , j. pullin , phys . lett . * 68 * 431 ( 1992 ) . j. griego , phys . * d53 * 6966 ( 1996 ) . r. gambini , j. pullin , phys . rev . * d54 * 5935 ( 1996 ) . c. rovelli , l. smolin , phys . lett . * 61 * 1155 ( 1988 ) . j. lewandowski , d. marolf , int . j. mod d7 * , 299 ( 1998 ) . j. lewandowski , t. thiemann , class . * 16 * 2299 ( 1999 ) . b. brgmann , r. gambini , j. pullin , nucl . phys . * b385 * , 587 ( 1992 ) . r. gambini , j. griego , j. pullin , nucl . phys . * b534 * , 675 - 696 ( 1998 ) . r. gambini , j. pullin , phys . rev . * d59 * , 124021 ( 1999 ) . t. thiemann , class . grav . * 15 * , 1249 ( 1998 ) . d. marolf , d. giulini , class . * 16 * 2479 ( 1999 ) . see for instance a. ashtekar , j. baez , a. corichi , k. krasnov phys . lett . * 80 * , 904 ( 1998 ) , and references therein . l. freidel , k. krasnov , r. puzio , hep - th/9901069 . Abstract:
[ "in a companion paper we introduced a kinematical arena for the discussion of the constraints of canonical quantum gravity in the spin network representation based on vassiliev invariants . in this paper we introduce the hamiltonian constraint , extend the space of states to non - diffeomorphism invariant `` habitats '' and check that the off - shell quantum constraint commutator algebra reproduces the classical poisson algebra of constraints of general relativity without anomalies . one can therefore consider the resulting set of constraints and space of states as a consistent theory of canonical quantum gravity . psfig # 1#1 psfig cgpg-99/11 - 1 + gr - qc/9911010 +" ]
12,771
12,771
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: circular planar electrical networks were studied by curtis - ingerman - morrow @xcite and de verdire - gitler - vertigan @xcite . associated to any circular planar electrical network of order @xmath0 is its @xmath1 _ response matrix _ , and response matrices are characterized in ( * ? ? ? * theorem 4 ) as the symmetric matrices with row sums equal to zero and _ circular minors _ non - negative . furthermore , the circular minors which are strictly positive can be identified combinatorially using ( * ? ? ? * lemma 4.2 ) . this positivity condition is of particular interest to us , and the goal of this paper is to investigate the connections between electrical networks and other positivity phenomena in the literature . until now , the combinatorial properties of these response matrices have remained largely unstudied , despite their inherently combinatorial descriptions . a natural question that arises is : which sets of circular minors can be positive , while the others are zero ? it is clear ( for example , from the grassmann - plcker relations ) that one can not construct response matrices with arbitrary sets of positive circular minors . postnikov @xcite studied a similar question in the _ totally nonnegative grassmannian _ , as follows : for @xmath2 matrices @xmath3 , with @xmath4 and all @xmath5 minors nonnegative , which sets ( in fact , matroids ) of @xmath5 minors can be the set of positive minors of @xmath3 ? these sets , called _ positroids _ by knutson - lam - speyer @xcite , were found in @xcite to index many interesting combinatorial objects . two of these objects , plabic graphs and alternating strand diagrams , are highly similar to circular planar electrial networks and medial graphs , respectively , which we study in this paper . our introduction of _ electrical positroids _ is therefore a natural extension of the theory of positroids . we give a novel axiomatization of electrical positroids , motivated by the grassmann - plcker relations , and prove the following : a set @xmath6 of circular pairs is the set of positive circular minors of a response matrix if and only if @xmath6 is an electrical positroid . another point of interest is that of _ positivity tests _ for response matrices . in @xcite , fomin - zelevinsky describe various positivity tests for _ totally positive matrices _ : given an @xmath1 matrix , there exist sets of @xmath7 minors whose positivity implies the positivity of all minors . these sets of minors are described combinatorially by _ double wiring diagrams_. fomin - zelevinsky later introduced _ cluster algebras _ in @xcite , in part , to study similar positivity phenomena . in particular , their double wiring diagrams fit naturally within the realm of cluster algebras as manifestations of certain cluster algebra mutations . in a similar way , we describe sets of @xmath8 minors of an @xmath1 matrix @xmath9 whose positivity implies the positivity of all circular minors , that is , that @xmath9 is a response matrix for a top - rank ( in @xmath10 , as defined in @xcite ) electrical network . some such sets were first described by kenyon - wilson @xcite . however , these sets do not form clusters in a cluster algebra . instead , they form clusters in a _ laurent phenomenon ( lp ) algebra _ , a notion introduced by lam - pylyavskyy in @xcite . this observation leads to the last of our main theorems : there exists an lp algebra @xmath11 , isomorphic to the polynomial ring on @xmath8 generators , with an initial seed @xmath12 of diametric circular minors . @xmath12 is a positivity test for circular minors , and furthermore , all `` plcker clusters '' in @xmath11 , that is , clusters of circular minors , are positivity tests . in proving theorem [ lpalg ] , we find that @xmath11 is , in a sense , `` double - covered '' by a cluster algebra @xmath13 that behaves very much like @xmath11 when we restrict to certain types of mutations . further investigation of the clusters leads to an analogue of weak separation , as studied by oh - speyer - postnikov @xcite and scott @xcite . conjecturally , the `` plcker clusters , '' of @xmath11 correspond exactly to the maximal pairwise weakly separated sets of circular pairs . furthermore , we conjecture that these maximal pairwise weakly separated sets are related to each other by mutations corresponding to the grasmann - plcker relations . while we establish several weak forms of the conjecture , the general statement remains open . the roadmap of the paper is as follows . we begin by briefly reviewing terminology and known results in [ defs ] , referring the reader to @xcite for a more detailed exposition . in [ circpos ] , we motivate and introduce electrical positroids , and prove theorem [ circposthm ] . in [ lpsec ] , using positivity tests as a springboard , we construct @xmath11 and prove theorem [ lpalg ] , and conclude by establishing weak forms of conjecture [ wsconj ] , which relates the clusters of @xmath11 to positivity tests and our new analogue of weak separation . we recommend that the reader begin by reviewing the definitions and notational conventions from @xcite . for convenience , we re - state some of the more important definitions and results that we will use in this paper . a * circular planar graph * @xmath14 is a planar graph embedded in a disk @xmath15 . @xmath14 is allowed to have self - loops and multiple edges , and has at least one vertex on the boundary of @xmath15 - such vertices are called * boundary vertices*. a * circular planar electrical network * ( or more simply an * electrical network * is a circular planar graph @xmath14 , together with a * conductance map * @xmath16 . associated to an electrial network is its * response matrix * , which is obtained by imposing voltages at the boundary vertices and measuring the resulting boundary currents . more details are given in @xcite . two electrical networks @xmath17 are * equivalent * if they have the same response matrix . the equivalence relation is denoted by @xmath18 . recall also the * local equivalences * , described in detail in @xcite and @xcite : self - loop and spike removal , series and parallel edge replacement , and @xmath19-@xmath20 transformations . these local equivalences are sufficient to generate the equivalence relation @xmath18 : [ localeqenough ] two electrical networks are equivalent if and only if they are related by a sequence of local equivalences . as in @xcite , we will often consider only the underlying circular planar graph of an electrical network . accordingly , we use the following notion of equivalence of circular planar graphs : let @xmath21 be circular planar graphs , each with the same number of boundary vertices . then , @xmath21 are * equivalent * ( with the equivalence abusively denoted @xmath18 ) if there exist conductances @xmath22 on @xmath21 , respectively such that @xmath17 are equivalent electrical networks . alternatively , @xmath23 if @xmath24 and @xmath25 are related by a sequence of local equivalences . the central ingredient to this paper is the characterization of response matrices given in @xcite . in order to state this characterization , we recall the definitions of circular pairs and circular minors . [ circpair ] let @xmath26 and @xmath27 be disjoint ordered subsets of the boundary vertices of an electrical network @xmath28 . we say that @xmath29 is a * circular pair * if @xmath30 are in clockwise order around the circle . we will refer to @xmath31 as the * size * of the circular pair . [ flippq ] we will take @xmath29 to be the same circular pair as @xmath32 , where @xmath33 denotes the ordered set @xmath34 with its elements reversed . almost all of our definitions and statements are compatible with this convention ; most notably , by theorem [ circularminorspositive](a ) , because response matrices are positive , the circular minors @xmath35 and @xmath36 are the same . whenever there is a question as to the effect of choosing either @xmath29 or @xmath32 , we take extra care to point the possible ambiguity . [ connection ] let @xmath29 and @xmath28 be as in definition [ circpair ] . we say that there is a * connection * from @xmath34 to @xmath37 in @xmath14 if there exists a collection of vertex - disjoint paths from @xmath38 to @xmath39 in @xmath14 , and furthermore each path in the collection contains no boundary vertices other than its endpoints . we denote the set of circular pairs @xmath29 for which @xmath34 is connected to @xmath37 by @xmath40 . let @xmath29 and @xmath28 be as in definition [ circpair ] , and let @xmath9 be the response matrix . we define the * circular minor * associated to @xmath29 to be the determinant of the @xmath5 matrix @xmath35 with @xmath41 . as in @xcite , we often refer to submatrices and their determinants both as minors , interchangeably . we now have the language needed to state the characterization of response matrices : [ circularminorspositive ] let @xmath9 be an @xmath1 matrix . then : 1 . @xmath9 is the response matrix for an electrical network @xmath28 if and only if @xmath9 is symmetric with row and column sums equal zero , and each of the circular minors @xmath35 is non - negative . 2 . if @xmath9 is the response matrix for an electrical network @xmath28 , the positive circular minors @xmath35 are exactly those for which there is a connection from @xmath34 to @xmath37 . let us also mention include two more tools which we will need in what follows . [ equivalentconnections ] the circular planar graphs @xmath42 and @xmath43 are equivalent if and only if @xmath44 . it is easily checked that local equivalences preserve @xmath45 , so if @xmath46 , then @xmath44 . conversely , if @xmath44 , there exist critical ( see @xcite graphs @xmath47 with @xmath48 and @xmath49 , by ( * ? ? ? * thorme 2 ) . then , @xmath50 , so the claim follows from ( * ? ? ? * theorem 1 ) . let @xmath51 be a circular planar graph , and let @xmath52 be an edge with endpoints @xmath53 . the * deletion * of @xmath52 from @xmath51 is exactly as named ; the edge @xmath52 is removed while leaving the rest of the vertices and edges of @xmath51 unchanged . if @xmath53 are not both boundary vertex of @xmath51 , we may also perform a * contraction * of @xmath52 , which identifies all points of @xmath52 . if exactly one of @xmath53 is a boundary vertex , then the image of @xmath52 under the contraction is a boundary vertex . note that edges connecting two boundary vertices can not be contracted to either endpoint . by theorem [ circularminorspositive ] , @xmath1 response matrices are characterized in the following way : a square matrix @xmath9 is the response matrix for an electrical network @xmath28 if and only if @xmath9 is symmetric , its row and column sums are zero , and its circular minors @xmath35 are non - negative . furthermore , @xmath35 is positive if and only if there is a connection from @xmath34 to @xmath37 in @xmath14 . the sets @xmath6 of circular pairs for which there exists a response matrix @xmath9 with @xmath35 is positive if and only if @xmath54 , then , are thus our next objects of study . the case of the totally nonnegative grassmannian was studied in @xcite : for @xmath2 ( with @xmath4 ) matrices with non - negative maximal minors , the possible sets of positive maximal minors are called _ positroids _ , and are a special class of matroids . our objects will be called _ electrical positroids _ , which we first construct axiomatically , then prove are exactly those sets @xmath6 of positive circular minors in response matrices . here , we present the axioms for electrical positroids , which arise naturally from the grassmann - plcker relations . let @xmath9 be a fixed matrix , whose rows and columns are indexed by some sets @xmath55 . we write @xmath56 for the determinant of the matrix @xmath57 formed by deleting the rows corresponding to @xmath58 and @xmath59 , provided @xmath57 is square . while the meaning @xmath56 depends on the underlying sets @xmath55 , these sets will always be implicit . [ gp ] we have the following two * grassmann - plcker * relations . 1 . let @xmath9 be an @xmath1 matrix , with @xmath60 elements of its row set and @xmath61 elements of its column set . furthermore , suppose that the row @xmath62 appears above row @xmath63 and column @xmath64 appears to the left of column @xmath65 . then , @xmath66 2 . let @xmath9 be an @xmath67 matrix , with @xmath68 elements of its row set ( appearing in this order , from top to bottom ) , and let @xmath65 an element of its column set . then , @xmath69 while the grasmann - plcker relations are purely algebraic in formulation , they encode combinatorial information concerning the connections of circular pairs in a circular planar graph @xmath14 . as a simple example , consider four boundary vertices @xmath70 in clockwise order of an electrical network @xmath28 , and let @xmath71 . if @xmath9 is the response matrix of @xmath28 , then @xmath72 is the circular minor associated to the circular pair @xmath73 ; thus , @xmath57 has non - negative determinant . furthermore , the entries of @xmath57 are @xmath74 circular minors of @xmath9 , so they , too , must be non - negative . now , suppose that the left hand side of ( [ p1 ] ) is positive , that is , @xmath75 . equivalently , there are connections between @xmath63 and @xmath65 and between @xmath62 and @xmath64 in @xmath14 . then , at least one of the two terms on the right hand side must be strictly positive ; combinatorially , this means that either there are connections between @xmath63 and @xmath64 and between @xmath62 and @xmath65 , or there is a connection between @xmath76 and @xmath77 . one can derive similar combinatorial rules by assuming one of the terms on the right hand side is positive , and deducing that the left hand side must be positive as well . the first six of the electrical positroid axioms given in definition [ posaxioms ] summarize all of the information that can be extracted in this way from the grassmann - plcker relations . if @xmath78 , write @xmath79 for the ordered set formed by removing @xmath62 from @xmath34 . [ posaxioms ] a set @xmath6 of circular pairs is an * electrical positroid * if it satisfies the following eight axioms : 1 . for ordered sets @xmath80 and @xmath81 , with @xmath82 in clockwise order ( that is , @xmath29 is a circular pair ) , consider any @xmath83 , @xmath84 , @xmath85 , @xmath86 with @xmath87 and @xmath88 . then : 1 . [ axside ] if @xmath89 , then either @xmath90 or @xmath91 . [ axcross ] if @xmath90 , then @xmath89 . 3 . [ axsep ] if @xmath91 , then @xmath89 . 1 . for @xmath92 and @xmath81 , with @xmath93 in clockwise order , consider any @xmath83 , @xmath84 , @xmath94 , @xmath86 with @xmath95 . then : 1 . [ axmid ] if @xmath96 , then either @xmath97 or @xmath98 . [ axleft ] if @xmath97 , then @xmath96 . [ axright ] if @xmath99 , then @xmath96 . finally : 1 . [ axsub ] ( * subset axiom * ) for @xmath100 and @xmath101 with @xmath29 a circular pair , if @xmath54 , then @xmath102 . [ axempty ] @xmath103 . [ circposthm ] a set @xmath6 of circular pairs is an electrical positroid if and only if there exists a response matrix whose positive circular minors are exactly those corresponding to @xmath6 . given a response matrix @xmath9 , it is straightforward to check that the set @xmath6 of circular pairs corresponding to the positive circular minors of @xmath9 satisfies the first six axioms , by proposition [ gp ] . @xmath6 also satisfies the subset axiom , by theorem [ circularminorspositive ] . finally , adopting the convention that the empty determinant is equal to 1 , we have the last axiom . to prove theorem [ circposthm ] , we thus need to show that any electrical positroid @xmath6 may be realized as the set of positive circular minors of a response matrix , or equivalently the set of connections in a circular planar graph . we now prove theorem [ circposthm ] . first , recall the important convention that @xmath104 . we leave it to the reader to check , whenever appropriate , that all of the definitions and statements we make in this section are compatible with this convention . fix a boundary circle with @xmath0 boundary vertices , which we label @xmath105 in clockwise order . in this section , all labels are considered modulo @xmath0 . we have shown , via the grassmann - plcker relations , that the set of circular pairs corresponding to the positive circular minors of a response matrix is an electrical positroid . we now prove that , for all electrical positroids @xmath6 , there exists a critical graph @xmath51 for which @xmath106 , which will establish theorem [ circposthm ] . the idea of the argument is as follows . assume , for sake of contradiction , that there exists some electrical positroid @xmath6 for which there does not exist such a critical graph @xmath51 with @xmath106 . then , let @xmath107 have maximal size among all such electrical positroids . note that @xmath107 does not contain all circular pairs @xmath29 , because otherwise @xmath108 , where @xmath109 denotes a critical representative of the top - rank element of @xmath10 ( see @xcite ) . we will then add circular pairs to @xmath107 according to the boundary edge and boundary spike properties ( cf . @xcite ) , discussed below , to form an electrical positroid @xmath110 . by the maximality of @xmath107 , @xmath111 for some critical graph @xmath112 . we will then delete a boundary edge or contract a boundary spike in @xmath112 to obtain a graph @xmath113 , and show that @xmath114 . we begin by defining two properties of circular pairs , the @xmath115-boundary edge property and the @xmath116-boundary spike property . let us first adopt a notational convention . given a circular pair @xmath29 , let @xmath117 denote the unique circular pair ( if it exists ) with @xmath118 and @xmath119 as sets . in the ordered sets @xmath120 , @xmath121 are inserted in the appropriate positions so that @xmath117 is indeed a circular pair . given arbitrary @xmath122 , @xmath117 may not be a circular pair . however , whenever we make reference to a pair of this form without commenting on its existence , we assert implicitly that it is , in fact , a circular pair . we say that a set @xmath6 of circular pairs has the * @xmath115-bep ( boundary edge property ) * if , for all circular pairs @xmath54 , if @xmath123 is a circular pair , then @xmath124 . according to remark [ flippq ] , if @xmath6 has the @xmath115-bep , then if @xmath54 and @xmath125 is a circular pair , then @xmath126 . [ graphbepbsp ] recall the definitions of boundary edges and boundary spikes from @xcite . let @xmath51 be a circular planar graph , and write @xmath127 . 1 . there exists @xmath128 with a boundary edge @xmath115 if and only if @xmath6 has the @xmath115-bep . there exists @xmath128 has a boundary spike at @xmath116 if and only if @xmath6 has the @xmath116-bsp . we prove ( a ) ; the proof of ( b ) is similar . without loss of generality , we may assume that @xmath129 . it easy to check that if @xmath51 has a boundary edge , then @xmath6 must have the corresponding bep . conversely , suppose that @xmath6 has the @xmath130-bep . then , let @xmath131 be the graph obtained by adding an edge @xmath130 in @xmath51 such that the added edge does not cut through any faces of @xmath51 . clearly , @xmath132 consists only of circular pairs @xmath29 such that @xmath133 or @xmath134 . however , @xmath6 contains all such circular pairs , so in fact @xmath135 . then , by theorem [ equivalentconnections ] , @xmath136 . it is left to check that @xmath137 , for some circular planar graph @xmath138 with the boundary edge @xmath130 . let @xmath60 be the two medial boundary vertices between @xmath139 and @xmath140 in @xmath141 . note that adding the edge @xmath130 to @xmath51 corresponds to introducing an additional crossing in @xmath141 between the ( distinct ) wires with endpoints @xmath62 and @xmath63 . introducing this new crossing yields an equivalent medial graph , so it must have created it a lens . from here , it is easily seen , after applying ( * ? ? ? * lemma 6.3 ) , that motions may be applied in @xmath142 so that this lens corresponds to parallel edges between the boundary vertices @xmath139 and @xmath140 in some @xmath143 . the desired conclusion follows . [ allbepbsp ] if @xmath6 has all @xmath0 beps and all @xmath0 bsps , then @xmath6 contains all circular pairs . we proceed by induction on the size of @xmath29 that @xmath54 for all circular pairs @xmath29 . first , suppose that @xmath144 . first , @xmath145 for all @xmath116 , because it has all beps and @xmath103 . then , because @xmath6 has the @xmath116-bsp , and @xmath146 we obtain @xmath147 . continuing in this way gives that @xmath6 contains all circular pairs @xmath29 with @xmath144 . now , suppose that @xmath6 contains all circular pairs of size @xmath148 . let @xmath149 be a circular pair of size @xmath31 . by assumption , @xmath150 . because @xmath6 has all beps , @xmath151 and @xmath152 , so by the @xmath153-bsp , @xmath154 . continuing in this way gives @xmath155 , so we have the desired claim . in particular , lemma [ allbepbsp ] tells us that there exists an @xmath116 such that @xmath107 , as defined in the beginning of this section , either does not have the @xmath115-bep for some @xmath116 , or does not have the @xmath116-bsp for some @xmath116 . we first assume that @xmath107 does not have all beps ; without loss of generality , suppose that @xmath107 does not have the @xmath156-bep . we will now add circular pairs to @xmath107 to obtain an electrical positroid @xmath110 that does have the @xmath156-bep . specifically , we add to @xmath107 every circular pair @xmath157 , where @xmath158 has @xmath159 ( here @xmath160 ) , to obtain @xmath110 . according to remark [ flippq ] , this construction also puts any @xmath161 , where @xmath158 and @xmath162 . @xmath163 is an electrical positroid , and has the @xmath156-bep . the proof is straightforward , so it is omitted . by assumption , @xmath107 is the maximal electrical positroid for which any circular planar graph @xmath51 has @xmath164 . thus , there exists a graph @xmath112 be a graph such that @xmath165 , and @xmath112 may be taken to have a boundary edge @xmath156 by lemma [ graphbepbsp ] . then , let @xmath113 be the result of deleting the boundary edge @xmath156 . to obtain a contradiction , it is enough to prove that @xmath166 . we now present a series of technical lemmas . [ completedef ] consider a circular pair @xmath158 for which @xmath167 . we will assume , for the rest of this section , that @xmath157 is a circular pair . @xmath29 is said to be is * incomplete * if @xmath168 , and * complete * if @xmath169 . [ crossing ] let @xmath170 be an incomplete circular pair , such that @xmath157 is a circular pair ( and is not in @xmath107 ) . furthermore , assume that @xmath29 is * minimal * , that is , @xmath171 is complete . then , for all @xmath172 , @xmath173 . immediate from axiom [ axside ] of definition [ posaxioms ] . [ trip ] let @xmath174 be a circular pair . then , if @xmath175 , then @xmath176 . immediate from axiom [ axcross ] . [ walk ] if @xmath177 , @xmath178 , and @xmath179 appear in clockwise order , then @xmath180 . if @xmath181 and @xmath182 , the claim follows from axiom [ axleft ] , axiom [ axright ] and induction on @xmath0 . otherwise , it follows from axiom [ axside ] and induction on @xmath0 . [ min ] let @xmath170 be a complete circular pair . then , @xmath183 is complete for all @xmath184 . applying axiom [ axright ] with @xmath185 to @xmath186 gives @xmath187 . then another application of axiom [ axright ] , to @xmath188 with @xmath189 gives the desired result . [ rtol ] let @xmath190 be a circular pair , where @xmath191 are sequences of boundary vertices . suppose that @xmath192 then , @xmath193 . first , write @xmath194 , where @xmath195 and @xmath196 are the last elements of the ordered sets @xmath197 , respectively . then , if @xmath198 , an application of axiom [ axleft ] on @xmath199 with @xmath200 yields @xmath201 . similarly , we find by induction that @xmath202 . then , we have @xmath203 by axiom [ axleft ] applied to @xmath204 with @xmath205 . similarly , write @xmath206 , where @xmath207 are the first elements of @xmath208 , respectively . by axiom [ axleft ] applied to @xmath209 with @xmath210 , we see that @xmath211 . the lemma then follows from axiom [ axright ] applied to @xmath212 with @xmath213 . let @xmath191 be sequences of indices , and let @xmath214 be a circular pair . suppose @xmath215 then @xmath216 . with the same notation as in the previous lemma , @xmath217 by axiom [ axright ] on @xmath218 with @xmath219 . then , an inductive argument shows that @xmath220 . a similar argument shows that @xmath221 . then , axiom [ axright ] applied to @xmath222 with @xmath223 implies that @xmath224 and applying axiom [ axright ] again to @xmath225 with @xmath226 yields the desired result . [ pa1qbn ] consider a circular pair @xmath227 , and let @xmath228 be an incomplete circular pair with @xmath229 in clockwise order . then , any electrical positroid @xmath230 satisfying @xmath231 contains @xmath232 . it is easy to see that any element of @xmath233 must be of the form @xmath234 , for some @xmath235 . by axiom [ axside ] , @xmath236 and @xmath237 implies that either @xmath238 , or @xmath239 and @xmath240 . we are done in the former case , so assume for sake of contradiction that we have the latter . @xmath241 are not of the form @xmath242 , so can not lie in @xmath243 ; thus , @xmath244 . finally , axiom [ axcross ] yields us @xmath245 , a contradiction , so we are done . two pairs of indices @xmath246 and @xmath247 are said to * cross * if @xmath248 and @xmath249 . [ betternotation ] for ease of notation , denote the sequence of indices @xmath250 by @xmath251 . we now algorithmically construct a set @xmath252 of circular pairs , which we will call * primary * circular pairs . we will use this notion to eventually prove lemma [ uniclos ] , a key ingredient in our proof of the main theorem . the construction is as follows : begin by placing @xmath253 . then , for each @xmath254 , if we also have @xmath158 , perform the following operation . * let @xmath62 be the first index appearing clockwise from @xmath255 such that there exists @xmath64 with @xmath256 crossing @xmath257 , and also @xmath258 . if @xmath62 does not exist , stop . otherwise , with @xmath62 fixed , take @xmath64 to be the first index appearing counterclockwise from @xmath259 satisfying these properties . * if @xmath62 exists , add @xmath260 to @xmath252 , and remove @xmath261 . * similarly , let @xmath63 to be the largest index counterclockwise from @xmath259 such that there exists @xmath65 with @xmath262 crossing @xmath257 and @xmath263 . if @xmath63 does not exist , stop . otherwise , with @xmath63 fixed , take @xmath65 to be the first index clockwise from @xmath255 with these properties . * if @xmath264 and @xmath265 ( note that if @xmath266 , then @xmath267 ) , then add @xmath268 to @xmath252 . note that @xmath269 or else , by [ axside ] , @xmath64 could originally have been set to @xmath65 . it is easily seen that at any time , the algorithm may be performed on the elements of @xmath252 in any order , and that it will eventually terminate , when the operation described above results in no change in @xmath252 for all @xmath270 . [ connset ] for a circular pair @xmath271 , define @xmath272 . we will take @xmath273 to be an ordered set and abusively refer to its elements as * connections*. [ pcpcont ] for any incomplete circular pair @xmath29 , there exists a circular pair @xmath274 such that any electrical positroid @xmath230 satisfying @xmath275 contains @xmath157 . by lemma [ pa1qbn ] , we may assume that @xmath29 is a minimal incomplete circular pair . let @xmath276 ( see definition [ betternotation ] ) . consider the primary circular pairs whose first @xmath116 connections are the same as those of @xmath29 . by the construction of @xmath252 , there are at most two such primary circular pairs , which we denote by @xmath277 by lemma [ crossing ] and the construction of @xmath252 , we have that @xmath278 and @xmath279 or @xmath280 and @xmath281 ( or else we would have been able to set @xmath282 or @xmath283 ) . furthermore , exactly one of these pairs of inequalities holds . let us assume that the former holds , as the latter case is identical , and in this case , call @xmath284 the primary circular pair associated to @xmath29 . if , on the other hand , @xmath284 ( as above ) is the only primary circular pair sharing its @xmath116 connections with @xmath29 , then @xmath278 and @xmath279 , and we still refer to @xmath284 as the primary circular pair associated to @xmath29 . we now prove the lemma by retrograde induction on @xmath116 , where here @xmath116 is such that the first @xmath116 connections of @xmath29 are shared with some primary circular pair . if @xmath285 , we are done by lemma [ pa1qbn ] , and if the first @xmath116 connections of @xmath29 are exactly the primary circular pair in question , we are done by the subset axiom . otherwise , we first need @xmath286 , which follows from lemmas [ trip ] and [ rtol ] , where the conditions of these lemmas are satisfied as a result of lemma [ crossing ] . it is easy to see that the primary circular pair associated to @xmath287 is the same as that for @xmath29 . it follows , then , by the inductive hypothesis , that @xmath288 . when @xmath289 and @xmath290 , lemma [ ltol ] yields the desired result , and if one of @xmath291 or @xmath292 , we are done by a similar argument . [ unpcp ] there is exactly one circular pair in @xmath252 that does not lie in @xmath107 , which we call the * @xmath107-primary circular pair*. by lemma [ pcpcont ] , @xmath293 has at least one element , because @xmath107 does not have the @xmath156-bep . assume , for sake of contradiction , that @xmath293 has two elements , of the form @xmath294 because @xmath295 and @xmath296 , we must have @xmath297 , by axiom [ axside ] . thus , @xmath298 , by the subset axiom . by the same argument applied to @xmath299 , we must have @xmath300 , so axiom [ axcross ] gives @xmath301 . however , because @xmath302 , we have a contradiction of the definition of @xmath65 . thus , @xmath303 . [ contpcp ] for any incomplete circular pair @xmath29 , any electrical positroid @xmath230 satisfying @xmath231 contains the @xmath107-primary circular pair . proceed by retrograde induction on @xmath116 , where @xmath116 is such that the first @xmath116 connections of @xmath29 are the same as those of some primary circular pair . by the subset axiom , we can assume that @xmath29 is minimal . the base case is immediate from the subset axiom , so suppose that @xmath304 . let @xmath305 then , we need to show that , if @xmath236 , then @xmath306 . first , suppose that both @xmath307 and @xmath308 . then , the desired claim is exactly lemma [ rtol ] , as long as @xmath309 . assume , then , that @xmath310 . first , an application of lemma [ rtol ] yields @xmath311 , which implies @xmath312 and @xmath313 . furthermore , if @xmath314 , then axiom [ axleft ] yields @xmath315 , a contradiction . similarly , we have @xmath316 . as a result , applying axiom [ axmid ] to @xmath317 with @xmath318 gives @xmath319 . one more application of axiom [ axmid ] to @xmath320 with @xmath321 yields the desired result . if one of the indices @xmath291 or @xmath292 , then we are also done by a similar argument . [ uniclos]for any two incomplete circular pairs @xmath29 and @xmath322 , any electrical positroid @xmath230 satisfying @xmath323 must also contain @xmath242 . by lemma [ contpcp ] , @xmath230 must contain the @xmath107-primary circular pair . the claim then follows by lemma [ pcpcont ] . by the above results , if we start with our set @xmath107 and some incomplete circular pair @xmath158 , `` completing '' @xmath29 by adding @xmath157 to @xmath107 will require that we have completed every incomplete pair . we now finish the proof of theorem [ circposthm ] , in the boundary edge case . let @xmath324 denote the subset of circular pairs in @xmath107 without the connection @xmath325 , and define @xmath326 similarly for @xmath327 , respectively . by construction , it is easily seen that @xmath328 . while @xmath329 may not necessarily be an electrical positroid , we have : [ findclos ] there exists an electrical positroid @xmath330 with @xmath331 . we give an algorithm to construct such an electrical positroid @xmath330 . we begin by setting @xmath332 ; note that @xmath330 satisfies the last two electrical positroid axioms , but may not satisfy the first six . each of the first six axioms are of the form @xmath333 , or otherwise @xmath333 or @xmath334 . at each step of the algorithm , if @xmath330 is an electrical positroid , we stop , and if not , we pick an electrical positroid axiom @xmath335 ( among the first six ) not satisfied by @xmath336 . we then show that we can add elements of @xmath337 to @xmath330 so that @xmath335 is satisfied by @xmath338 , and so that @xmath330 also still satisfies the subset axiom . it is clear that adding circular pairs to @xmath330 in this way is possible when @xmath335 is one of axioms [ axcross ] , [ axsep ] , [ axleft ] , and [ axright ] : we take the add circular pairs @xmath339 , as above , as well as all of the circular pairs formed by subsets of their respective connections . we will show that this operation is also possible when @xmath335 is one of axioms [ axside ] and [ axmid ] . from here , it will be clear that the algorithm must terminate , because we can only add finitely many elements to @xmath330 . therefore , we will eventually find @xmath330 with the desired properties . in each of the cases below , the circular pairs added to @xmath330 are always assumed to be added along with each of their subsets , that is , the circular pairs formed by subsets of their connections . in this way , the subset axiom is satisfied by @xmath330 at all steps in the algorithm . we first consider axiom [ axside ] , which we assume to fail in @xmath330 when applied to @xmath340 . if @xmath341 , either @xmath342 or @xmath343 . it is easy to see that @xmath344 and @xmath345 ( or vice versa , but we can swap @xmath34 and @xmath37 and reverse their orders ) , or else axiom [ axside ] already would have been satisfied by @xmath340 . we proceed by casework : * @xmath346 . then , because axiom [ axside ] fails , we have @xmath347 . thus , we may add @xmath348 to @xmath330 , and these lie in @xmath349 . * @xmath350 . we have @xmath351 . first , suppose that @xmath352 . because @xmath353 does not contain the connection @xmath325 , we have @xmath354 . then , @xmath355 , so we may add may @xmath29 to @xmath330 , so that axiom [ axside ] is satisfied with @xmath351 ( note that @xmath356 is already in @xmath330 ) . + now , suppose instead that @xmath357 . if @xmath358 , then @xmath359 by the subset axiom . then , @xmath355 , and so we may add @xmath29 to @xmath330 to satisfy axiom [ axside ] . now , assume that @xmath360 . for any electrical positroid @xmath361 , axiom [ axleft ] applied to @xmath362 and @xmath363 gives that @xmath364 and @xmath365 implies @xmath366 and @xmath367 . by the discussion above , we have @xmath368 , and so we may add @xmath369 to @xmath330 . the case in which @xmath370 is identical . * the case @xmath371 may be handled using similar logic ; the details are left to the reader . finally , consider axiom [ axmid ] , which we assume to fail for @xmath372 . as before , we may assume @xmath373 . * @xmath374 , or @xmath375 . similar to the first case above . * @xmath376 . then , we have @xmath377 . as in the second case for axiom [ axside ] , we may assume that we have @xmath378 and @xmath379 , or else both @xmath107 and @xmath380 would contain exactly one of @xmath381 and @xmath382 . moreover , we may assume that we have @xmath383 by similar logic . because @xmath384 and @xmath383 , we may apply axiom [ axsep ] to find that @xmath385 . thus , we can add @xmath386 to @xmath330 , so that we still have @xmath387 . the case @xmath388 is identical . * the cases @xmath389 and @xmath390 may be handled using similar logic ; we again omit the details . thus , in all cases , our algorithm is well - defined , and we are done . by lemma [ uniclos ] , we must in fact have @xmath391 , provided that neither @xmath107 nor @xmath380 is equal to @xmath110 , which is true by construction ( recall that @xmath392 is critical ) . the proof is complete , in the boundary edge case . it is left to consider the case in which @xmath107 has the @xmath115-bep , for each @xmath116 , but fails to have the @xmath116-bsp , for some @xmath116 . without loss of generality , suppose that @xmath107 does not have the @xmath139-bsp . we now form @xmath110 as the union of @xmath107 and the set of all circular pairs @xmath117 such that @xmath393 , where @xmath29 is a circular pair with @xmath394 . in appendix [ bspcase ] , we form a circular planar graph @xmath112 such that @xmath165 and @xmath112 has a boundary spike at 1 . then , contracting this boundary spike to obtain the graph @xmath113 , we find that @xmath114 . therefore , with the additional results of appendix [ bspcase ] , the theorem is proven . we now study the lp algebra @xmath11 . our starting point will be _ positivity tests _ ; a particular positivity test will form the initial seed in @xmath11 . we then proceed to investigae the algebraic and combinatorial properties of clusters in @xmath11 . let @xmath9 be a symmetric @xmath1 matrix with row and column sums equal to zero . in this section , we describe tests for deciding if @xmath9 is the response matrix for an electrical network @xmath14 in the top cell of @xmath10 , defined in @xcite . that is , we describe tests for deciding if all of the circular minors of @xmath9 are positive . these tests are similar to certain tests for total positivity described in @xcite . throughout the remainder of this section , all indices around the circle are considered modulo @xmath0 , and we will refer to circular pairs and their corresponding minors interchangeably . a set @xmath6 of circular pairs is a * positivity test * if , for all matrices @xmath9 whose minors corresponding to @xmath6 are positive , every circular minor of @xmath9 is positive ( equivalently , @xmath9 is the response matrix for a top - rank electrical network ) . we begin by describing a positivity test of size @xmath8 . fix @xmath0 vertices on a boundary circle , labeled @xmath105 in clockwise order . for two points @xmath395 $ ] , let @xmath396 denote the number of boundary vertices on the arc formed by starting at @xmath62 and moving clockwise to @xmath63 , inclusive . a circular pair @xmath397 is called * solid * if both sequences @xmath398 and @xmath399 appear consecutively in clockwise order around the circle . write @xmath400 , and @xmath401 . we will call a solid circular pair @xmath29 * picked * if one of the following conditions holds : * @xmath402 and @xmath403 , or * @xmath404 and @xmath405 let @xmath9 be a fixed symmetric @xmath1 matrix . define the set of * diametric pairs * @xmath12 to be the set of solid circular pairs @xmath29 such that either @xmath406 or @xmath407 and @xmath29 is picked . we will refer to the elements of @xmath12 as circular pairs and minors interchangeably . it is easily checked that @xmath408 . for a solid circular pair @xmath29 , we have that @xmath409 , so @xmath12 consists of the solid circular pairs with @xmath410 when @xmath0 is odd , and the solid circular pairs with either @xmath411 , or @xmath407 and @xmath29 is picked when @xmath0 is even . recall ( see remark [ flippq ] ) that the circular pairs @xmath29 and @xmath32 will be regarded as the same . note , for example , that @xmath412 if and only if @xmath413 , so the definition of @xmath12 is compatible with this convention . [ initialseed ] if @xmath9 is taken to be an @xmath1 symmetric matrix of indeterminates , any circular minor is a positive rational expression in the determinants of the elements of @xmath12 . we will make use of the grassmann - plcker relations , ( [ p1 ] ) and ( [ p2 ] ) , so we repeat them here : for @xmath73 a circular pair , @xmath414 and for @xmath415 in clockwise order , @xmath416 we will first show , by induction on @xmath417 , that any solid circular pair is a positive rational expression in the elements of @xmath12 . there is nothing to check when @xmath417 is equal to 0 ( when @xmath0 is even ) or 1 ( when @xmath0 is odd ) . if @xmath418 is a solid circular pair such that @xmath407 ( hence , @xmath0 is even ) and @xmath29 is not picked , then either @xmath419 or @xmath420 is a solid circular pair with @xmath407 , and it must be picked . assume , without loss of generality , that it is the former , and let @xmath421 , @xmath422 . letting @xmath423 , we have , by ( [ p1 ] ) , that : @xmath424 because @xmath425 is not picked , @xmath426 corresponds to a picked circular pair with @xmath407 , and @xmath427 and @xmath428 all have @xmath411 , so we have that @xmath29 is a rational expression of elements of @xmath12 . now , for @xmath429 , assume that all solid pairs with @xmath430 are positive rational expression in the elements of @xmath12 , and consider a solid pair @xmath29 with @xmath431 . then , either @xmath419 or @xmath420 is a solid circular pair with @xmath430 . assume , without loss of generality , that the former is the case . then , we may again set @xmath421 , @xmath422 , and @xmath432 , and ( [ apply1 ] ) still holds . each term on the right hand side corresponds to a solid pair with a smaller value of @xmath433 , so @xmath29 is a positive rational expression in the elements of @xmath12 , by the inductive hypothesis . we now show that any circular pair is a positive rational expression in the elements of @xmath12 . for a sequence @xmath434 of points ordered clockwise around the circle , let @xmath435 be the largest index such that @xmath436 are consecutive . if @xmath437 , then define @xmath438 and @xmath439 . if , on the other hand , @xmath440 , define @xmath441 . similarly , for a sequence @xmath442 of points ordered counterclockwise around the circle , let @xmath443 be the smallest index such that @xmath444 are consecutive . if @xmath445 , then define @xmath446 and @xmath447 . if , on the other hand , @xmath448 , define @xmath441 . for a circular pair @xmath29 , define @xmath449 , and note that @xmath450 , so @xmath451 is well - defined when we impose the convention @xmath104 . we finish the proof by showing that any circular pair is a positive rational expression in the elements of @xmath12 by induction on @xmath451 . if @xmath452 , then @xmath29 is solid and hence a rational expression in the elements of @xmath12 . now , assume that for any @xmath453 , every circular pair @xmath322 with @xmath454 is a rational expression in the elements of @xmath12 , and consider a circular pair @xmath29 with @xmath455 . assume , without loss of generality , that @xmath456 , and let @xmath457 . applying ( [ p1 ] ) to @xmath458 , we get : @xmath459 each term on the right hand side is easily seen to have a smaller value of @xmath451 than @xmath460 , so we are done by induction . [ postestcor ] @xmath12 is a positivity test . the positive rational expressions from the previous section are reminiscent of a cluster algebra structure ( see @xcite for definitions ) . in fact , ( [ p1 ] ) and ( [ p2 ] ) are exactly the exchange relations for the local moves in double wiring diagrams ( * ? ? ? * figure 9 ) . due to parity issues similar to those encountered when attempting to associate a cluster algebra to a non - orientable surface in @xcite , the structure of positivity tests is slightly different from a cluster algebra . we present the structure in two different ways : first , as a laurent phenomenon ( lp ) algebra @xmath11 ( see @xcite for definitions ) , and secondly as a cluster algebra @xmath13 similar to the double cover cluster algebra in @xcite . @xmath11 , we will find , is isomorphic to the polynomial ring on @xmath8 variables , but more importantly encodes the information of the positivity of the circular minors of a fixed @xmath1 matrix . we begin by describing an undirected graph @xmath461 that encodes the desired mutation relations among our initial seed . the vertex set of @xmath461 will be @xmath462 . a solid circular pair @xmath463 is called * maximal * if @xmath464 or @xmath465 and @xmath466 . a solid circular pair @xmath467 is called * limiting * if @xmath407 , @xmath29 is picked , and @xmath468 or @xmath469 . let us now describe the edges of @xmath470 : see figure [ q8 ] for an example . for each @xmath471 that is not maximal , limiting , or empty ( that is , equal to @xmath472 ) , there is a unique way to substitute values in [ p1 ] such that @xmath29 appears on the left hand side , and all four terms on the right hand side are in @xmath473 . we draw edges from @xmath29 to these four vertices in @xmath461 . finally , if @xmath474 are limiting , we draw an edge between them if their sizes differ by @xmath139 . the edges drawn in these two cases constitute all edges of @xmath475 . for any maximal circular pair @xmath29 , it can be proven that there exists a symmetric matrix @xmath3 such that @xmath3 is positive on any circular pair except @xmath476 . in fact , if @xmath29 is maximal and has @xmath406 , then the set of all circular pairs other than @xmath29 is an electrical positroid . hence , in our quivers , we will take the vertices corresponding to the maximal circular pairs and @xmath472 to be frozen . @xmath461 can then be embedded in the plane in a natural way with the circular pairs of size @xmath31 lying on the circle of radius @xmath31 centered at @xmath472 , and all edges except those between vertices corresponding to limiting circular pairs either along those circles or radially outward from @xmath472 . depicting the desired exhange relations among @xmath477 . vertices marked as squares correspond to frozen variables . @xmath478 , @xmath479 and @xmath480 are the limiting circular pairs . ] if we could orient the edges of @xmath461 such that they alternate between in- and out - edges at each non - frozen vertex , then the resulting quiver would give a cluster algebra such that mutations at vertices whose associated cluster variables are neither frozen not limiting correspond to the relation grassmann - plcker relation ( [ p1 ] ) . furthermore , these mutation relations among the vertices of @xmath473 constitute all of the grassmann - plcker relations for which five of the six terms on the right hand side are elements in @xmath473 , and the term which is not in @xmath475 is on the left hand side of the relation ( [ p1 ] ) or ( [ p2 ] ) . however , for @xmath481 , such an orientation of the edges of @xmath470 is impossible , because the dual graph of @xmath470 contains odd cycles . we thus define : [ deflmn ] let @xmath11 be the lp algebra constructed as follows : the initial seed @xmath482 has cluster variables equal to the minors in @xmath473 , with the maximal pairs and @xmath472 frozen , and , for any other @xmath471 , the exchange polynomial @xmath483 is the same as what is obtained from a quiver with underlying graph @xmath470 , such that the edges around the vertex associated to @xmath29 in @xmath461 alternate between in- and out - edges . for example , in @xmath484 , the exchange polynomial associated to the cluster variable @xmath485 is @xmath486 . we need the additional technical condition that @xmath483 is irreducible as a polynomial in the cluster variables @xmath475 , but the irreducibility is clear . we next define a cluster algebra @xmath13 which is a double cover of positivity tests , in the following sense : we begin consider an @xmath1 matrix @xmath57 , which we no longer assume to be symmetric . we write * non - symmetric circular pairs * in the row and column sets of @xmath57 as @xmath487 , so that @xmath487 and @xmath488 now represent different circular pairs . we will say that two expressions @xmath489 in the entries of @xmath57 * correspond * if swapping the rows and columns for each entry in @xmath3 gives @xmath490 , and we will write @xmath491 . for instance , @xmath492 . the set of cluster variables @xmath493 in our initial seed will consist of pairs @xmath487 such that @xmath494 . note that @xmath495 , as @xmath493 contains @xmath487 and @xmath488 for each @xmath496 , and finally @xmath472 . @xmath487 will be frozen in @xmath497 if @xmath29 was frozen in @xmath473 . we construct the undirected graph @xmath498 with vertex set @xmath497 by adding edges in the same way that @xmath461 was constructed . the only difference in our description is that if @xmath474 are limiting , then they will be adjacent only if their sizes differ by @xmath139 and @xmath499 . see figure [ qp ] for an example . . in the quiver @xmath500 , the edges alternate directions around a non - frozen vertex . ] unlike in @xmath461 , the edges of @xmath498 can be oriented such that they are alternating around each non - frozen vertex . let @xmath501 be the quiver from either orientation . then , let @xmath502 be the cluster algebra with initial quiver @xmath501 . breaking the symmetry of @xmath57 removed the parity problems from @xmath461 , so that we could define a cluster algebra , but we are still interested in using @xmath498 to study @xmath9 when @xmath9 is symmetric . toward this goal , we can restrict ourselves so that whenever we mutate at a cluster variable @xmath503 , we then mutate at @xmath504 immediately afterward . call this restriction the * symmetry restriction*. [ symm ] after the mutation sequence @xmath505 from the initial seed in @xmath502 , the number of edges from @xmath506 to @xmath507 in the quiver is equal to the number of edges from @xmath508 to @xmath509 for each @xmath121 in the final quiver . we proceed by induction on @xmath196 ; for @xmath510 , we have the claim by construction . now , suppose that we have performed the mutations @xmath511 and currently have the desired symmetry property . by the inductive hypothesis , @xmath512 and @xmath513 are not adjacent , or else we would have had edges between them in both directions , which would have been removed after mutations . thus , no edges incident to @xmath513 are created or removed upon mutating at @xmath512 . hence , mutating at @xmath513 afterward makes the symmetric changes to the graph , as desired . let @xmath514 $ ] and @xmath515 $ ] denote the polynomial rings in the off - diagonal entries of @xmath9 and @xmath57 respectively ; recall that @xmath9 is symmetric , so @xmath516 . then , we can define the * symmetrizing homomorphism * @xmath517 \to { \mathbb{c}}[m]$ ] by its action on the off - diagonal entries of @xmath57 : @xmath518 if @xmath6 is a set of polynomials in @xmath515 $ ] , then write @xmath519 . [ isom ] let @xmath520 be the cluster of @xmath502 that results from starting at the initial cluster and performing the sequence of mutations @xmath505 . let @xmath521 be the cluster of @xmath522 that results from starting at the initial cluster and performing the sequence of mutations @xmath523 . then , @xmath524 . using lemma [ symm ] , the proof is similar to ( * ? ? ? * proposition 4.4 ) . in light of lemma [ isom ] , we may understand the clusters in @xmath11 by forming `` double - cover '' clusters in @xmath13 . a sequence @xmath525 of mutations in @xmath11 corresponds to a sequence @xmath526 of twice as many mutations in @xmath13 , where we impose the symmetry restriction , and the cluster variables in @xmath11 after applying @xmath525 are the symmetrizations of those in @xmath13 after applying @xmath526 . [ lppos ] any cluster @xmath6 of @xmath11 consisting entirely of circular pairs is a positivity test . in @xmath502 , the exchange polynomial has only positive coefficients , so each variable in any cluster is a rational function with positive coefficients in the variables of any other cluster . in particular , each non - symmetric circular pair in @xmath527 is a rational function with positive coefficients in the variables of any cluster reachable under the symmetry restriction . hence , by lemma [ isom ] , each circular pair in @xmath528 can be written as a rational function with positive coefficients of the variables in @xmath6 . the desired result follows easily . as with double wiring diagrams for totally positive matrices @xcite , and plabic graphs for the totally nonnegative grassmannian @xcite , we now restricting ourselves to certain types of mutations in @xmath522 . a natural choice is mutations with exchange relations of the form [ p1 ] or [ p2 ] . these mutations keep us within clusters consisting entirely of circular minors , the `` plcker clusters . '' we begin by restricting ourselves only to mutations with exchange relations of the form [ p1 ] . because the initial seed @xmath529 consists only of solid circular pairs , we will only be able to mutate to other clusters consisting entirely of solid circular pairs . our goal is to chracterize these clusters . we will be able to write down such a characterization using corollary [ symallconsec ] and lemma [ isom ] , and give a more elegant description of the clusters in proposition [ wsconsec ] . let @xmath530 be a non - symmetric , non - empty circular pair . define the statistics @xmath531 , @xmath532 , and @xmath533 by : @xmath534 a non - symmetric solid circular pair @xmath487 is uniquely determined by the triple @xmath535 . a necessary condition for a triple @xmath536 to correspond to a non - symmetric solid circular pair is that @xmath537 . when the terms are non - symmetric solid circular pairs , ( [ p1 ] ) can be written using these triples as : @xmath538 after a mutation at @xmath539 , with non - symmetric solid circular pairs labeled by triples @xmath536 . in the quiver , the edges alternate directions around each non - frozen vertex . ] after a mutation at @xmath539 , with non - symmetric solid circular pairs labeled by triples @xmath536 . in the quiver , the edges alternate directions around each non - frozen vertex . ] we call two non - symmetric solid circular pairs corresponding to the triples @xmath540 and @xmath541 * adjacent * if @xmath542 and @xmath543 , or @xmath544 and @xmath545 . we call @xmath487 and @xmath546 * diagonally adjacent * if there are two non - symmetric solid circular pairs @xmath547 which are both adjacent to both @xmath487 and @xmath546 . we call @xmath547 the * connection * of @xmath548 . note that , in the initial quiver @xmath500 , adjacent and diagonally adjacent circular pairs correspond to vertices which are adjacent in particular ways . specifically , adjacent circular pairs correspond to vertices which are adjacent on the same concentric circle , or along the same radial spoke of @xmath549 . diagonally adjacent circular pairs correspond to those which are adjacent via all other edges , the `` diagonal '' edges . we can now classify clusters of @xmath13 which can be reached only using the mutations with exchange relation ( [ p1 ] ) . [ solidcluster ] we call a set @xmath6 of @xmath550 non - symmetric solid circular pairs a * solid cluster * if it has the following properties : * @xmath551 , * for each integer @xmath552 , and each @xmath553 , unless @xmath554 and @xmath330 is an integer , there is a @xmath15 such that the non - symmetric solid circular pair corresponding to @xmath536 is in @xmath6 , and * if @xmath555 and @xmath487 is adjacent to @xmath546 , then @xmath556 . [ embed ] there is a natural embedding of a solid cluster @xmath6 in the plane , similar to our embedding of @xmath498 . we place @xmath557 at any point , and then pairs of size @xmath31 on the circle of radius @xmath31 centered at that point . moreover , we place adjacent pairs of the same size consecutively around each circle , and adjacent pairs of different sizes collinear with @xmath557 . for a solid cluster @xmath6 of @xmath13 and associated quiver @xmath558 , we call @xmath559 a * solid seed * if it has the following properties : * vertices corresponding to maximal non - symmetric solid circular pairs are frozen , * there is an edge between any pair of adjacent vertices that are not both frozen , * there is an edge between diagonally adjacent vertices @xmath548 if their connection @xmath560 satisfies @xmath561 , * there is an edge from a size 1 vertex @xmath487 to @xmath557 if it would make the degree of @xmath487 even , * all edges of @xmath558 are in drawn in one of the four ways described above , and * all edges are oriented so that , in the embedding described in remark [ embed ] , edges alternate between in- and out - edges around any non - frozen vertex . if , furthermore , @xmath562 if and only if @xmath563 , or equivalently , the non - symmetric solid circular pair corresponding to @xmath536 is in @xmath6 if and only if that corresponding to @xmath564 is , then we call @xmath565 a * symmetric solid seed*. see , for example , figure [ bluesmutate ] . [ canmut ] in a solid seed @xmath566 , a variable @xmath567 has an exchange polynomial of the form ( [ p1 ] ) whenever its corresponding vertex in @xmath558 , and has edges to the vertices corresponding to its four adjacent variables in @xmath558 , and no other vertices . [ allconsec ] in @xmath502 , from the initial seed with cluster @xmath493 and quiver @xmath568 , mutations of the form ( [ p1 ] ) may be applied to obtain the seed @xmath569 if and only if @xmath569 is a solid seed . here , we do _ not _ impose the symmetry restriction . first , assume that @xmath569 via mutations of the form ( [ p1 ] ) . first , it is easy to check that @xmath570 is a solid seed . then , our mutations do indeed turn non - symmetric solid circular pairs into other non - symmetric solid circular pairs . furthermore , when we perform a mutation of the form ( [ p1 t ] ) at the vertex @xmath503 , the values of @xmath330 and @xmath31 do not change , and the value of @xmath15 changes from being either 2 more than the values of @xmath15 at the vertices adjacent to @xmath503 to being 2 less , or vice versa . hence , the resulting seed is also solid , so , by induction , @xmath569 is solid . conversely , assume @xmath569 is solid . we begin by noting that , by remark [ canmut ] , whenever the four terms on the right hand side of ( [ p1 t ] ) and one term on the left hand side are in our cluster , then we can perform the corresponding mutation . now , define @xmath571 to be the unique symmetric solid seed such that , for each @xmath572 , @xmath573 . for any solid seed @xmath569 , we give a mutation sequence @xmath574 using only mutations of the form ( [ p1 t ] ) that transforms @xmath569 into @xmath575 . hence , we will be able to get from the seed @xmath570 to @xmath569 by performing @xmath576 , followed by @xmath574 in reverse order . it is left to construct the desired mutation sequence . we define @xmath574 as follows : while the current seed is not @xmath571 , choose a vertex @xmath503 of the quiver , with associated cluster variable @xmath487 , for which the value of @xmath577 is maximized . we must have @xmath578 , and by maximality , for each vertex @xmath546 adjacent to @xmath487 , we must have @xmath579 . hence , we can mutate at @xmath29 to reduce @xmath577 by at least 2 . this process may be iterated to decrease the sum , over all cluster variables @xmath487 in our seed , of the @xmath577 , until we reach the seed @xmath571 . the proof is complete . [ symallconsec ] in @xmath502 , from our initial seed with cluster @xmath493 and quiver @xmath568 , we can apply symmetric pairs of mutations ( that is , mutations with the symmetry restriction ) of the form ( [ p1 ] ) to obtain the seed @xmath569 if and only if @xmath569 is a symmetric solid seed . the proof is almost identical to that of lemma [ allconsec ] . it suffices to note that in a symmetric solid seed , @xmath487 has a maximal value of @xmath580 if and only if @xmath581 does , so the mutation sequence @xmath574 can be selected to obey the symmetry restriction . using corollary [ symallconsec ] and lemma [ isom ] , we could also prove a similar result for the lp algebra @xmath522 . however , we will wait to do so until lemma [ wsconsec ] where we will describe it more elegantly using the notion of weak separation . we have now have the required machinery to prove our main theorem of this section . [ lpalg ] fix a symmetric @xmath1 matrix @xmath9 of distinct indeterminates . then , the @xmath582-laurent phenomenon algebra @xmath11 is isomorphic to the polynomial ring ( over @xmath582 ) on the @xmath8 non - diagonal entries of @xmath9 . we may directly apply the analogue of ( * ? ? ? * proposition 3.6 ) for lp algebras ( for which the proof is identical ) to @xmath522 as defined in definition [ deflmn ] . it is well - known that minors of a matrix of indeterminates are irreducible , so we immediately have that all of our seed variables are pairwise coprime . we also need to check that each initial seed variable is is coprime to the variable obtained by mutating its associated vertex in @xmath500 , and that this new variable is in the polynomial ring generated by the non - diagonal entries of @xmath9 . for non - limiting ( and non - frozen ) minors , this is clear , because each such mutation replaces a minor with another minor via ( [ p1 ] ) . for limiting minors , this is not the case , and we defer the proof to appendix [ nonplucker ] . it remains to check , then that each of the @xmath583 non - diagonal entries of @xmath57 appear as cluster variables in some cluster of @xmath13 . however , because @xmath74 minors are solid , the result is immediate from lemma [ symallconsec ] and lemma [ isom ] . because all @xmath74 minors are solid , mutations of the form ( [ p1 ] ) were sufficient to establish theorem [ lpalg ] . once we allow mutations of the form ( [ p2 ] ) , the clusters become more difficult to describe . however , let us propose the following conjecture , which has been established computationally for @xmath584 . [ getall ] every cluster of @xmath522 consisting entirely of circular pairs can be reached from the initial cluster using only mutations of the form ( [ p1 ] ) or ( [ p2 ] ) . we next introduce an analogue of weakly separated sets from @xcite for circular pairs . we recall the definition used in @xcite , @xcite , which is more natural in this case : two sets @xmath585 $ ] are * weakly separated * if there are no @xmath586 and @xmath587 such that @xmath588 or @xmath589 . our analogue is as follows : two circular pairs @xmath29 and @xmath590 are * weakly separated * if @xmath591 is weakly separated from @xmath592 , and @xmath593 is weakly separated from @xmath594 . note that @xmath29 is weakly separated from itself and from @xmath32 . furthermore , @xmath29 is weakly separated from @xmath590 if and only if @xmath32 is , so under the convention @xmath104 , weak separation is well - defined . [ wsconj ] let @xmath595 be a set of circular minors , for an @xmath1 generic response matrix . * @xmath595 is a minimal positivity test . * @xmath595 is a maximal set of pairwise weakly separated circular pairs . * @xmath595 is a cluster of @xmath11 . conjecture [ wsconj ] has been computationally verified for @xmath596 . we now prove various weak forms of this conjecture . first , for all clusters @xmath595 of @xmath11 that are reachable from the initial seed via grasmann - plcker relations ( cf . conjecture [ getall ] ) , the elements of @xmath595 are pairwise weakly separated : [ pluckerpreservesws ] if @xmath595 is a set of pairwise weakly separated circular pairs such that , for some substitution of values into ( [ p1 ] ) or ( [ p2 ] ) , all the terms on the right hand side , and one term @xmath29 on the left hand side , are in @xmath595 , then the remaining term @xmath590 on the left hand side is weakly separated from all of @xmath597 . let @xmath415 be as in ( [ p1 ] ) or ( [ p2 ] ) . it is clear that @xmath590 can only be non - weakly separated from an element of @xmath597 , if @xmath415 are boundary vertices forcing the non - weak separation .. however , this is easily seen to be impossible . when restricting ourselves to clusters of solid minors , the analogue of corollary [ symallconsec ] for @xmath522 matches exactly with a weak form of the equivalence @xmath598 in conjecture [ wsconj ] . [ wsconsec ] a set @xmath595 of solid circular pairs can be reached ( as a cluster ) from the initial cluster @xmath529 in @xmath522 using only mutations of the form ( [ p1 ] ) if and only if @xmath595 is a set of @xmath8 pairwise weakly separated solid circular pairs . the elements of the initial cluster @xmath529 in @xmath522 , which consists of the diametric pairs @xmath12 , are easily seen to be pairwise weakly separated . then , by proposition [ pluckerpreservesws ] , any cluster we can reach from @xmath529 using only mutations of the form ( [ p1 ] ) must also be pairwise weakly separated . conversely , consider any set @xmath595 of @xmath8 pairwise weakly separated solid circular pairs . let @xmath599 , and notice that @xmath600 . by corollary [ symallconsec ] and lemma [ isom ] , it is enough to prove that that @xmath601 is a solid cluster ( see definition [ solidcluster ] ) in @xmath13 . from here it will follow by definition that @xmath602 is a symmetric solid seed , meaning @xmath595 can be reached from @xmath529 in @xmath522 using only mutations of the form ( [ p1 ] ) , as desired . before proceeding , it is straightforward to check that circular pairs @xmath603 and @xmath604 are weakly separated if and only if the following four intersections are non - empty : @xmath605 we now prove that @xmath606 is a solid cluster . first , notice that if non - symmetric circular pairs @xmath607 and @xmath608 are such that @xmath609 and @xmath610 , but @xmath611 , then @xmath29 and @xmath612 are not weakly separated . hence , at most one of @xmath487 and @xmath546 is in @xmath602 . as there are exactly @xmath613 choices of @xmath330 and @xmath31 that give valid non - symmetric solid circular pairs , there must be one element of @xmath602 corresponding to each choice of @xmath614 . second , consider any adjacent @xmath487 and @xmath546 in @xmath602 . without loss of generality , one of * @xmath609 and @xmath615 , * @xmath610 and @xmath616 . holds . in either case , because @xmath487 and @xmath546 are weakly separated , we can see that @xmath556 . it follows that @xmath601 is a solid cluster , so we are done . we now relate @xmath617 and @xmath618 . recall that , by lemma [ lppos ] , any if @xmath595 satisfies @xmath617 , then @xmath595 is a positivity test . furthermore , @xmath619 . we can prove , similarly to ( * ? ? ? * theorem 1.2 ) , that : [ bound ] if @xmath595 satisfies @xmath620 , then @xmath621 . in fact , we can prove a slightly stronger result by interpreting a circular pair as a set of edges . for a circular pair @xmath271 , define @xmath272 ( cf . definition [ connset ] ) . similarly , for a set @xmath622 of edges such that no two edges in @xmath15 cross , let @xmath623 be the circular pair for which @xmath624 . [ strongbound ] if @xmath595 is a set of pairwise weakly separated circular pairs with @xmath625 then @xmath626 . procced by induction on @xmath627 . the case @xmath628 is trivial , so assume the result is true for @xmath629 . suppose that we have @xmath630 with @xmath631 , and assume for sake of contradiction that @xmath632 . choose some @xmath633 such that , for any other @xmath634 , @xmath64 and @xmath65 do not both lie on the arc drawn from @xmath62 to @xmath63 in the clockwise direction ( this arc is taken to include both @xmath62 and @xmath63 ) . now , letting @xmath635 , define the projection map @xmath636 by : @xmath637 we may define @xmath638 for circular pairs analogously : @xmath639 , and let @xmath640 . let us now prove two lemmas . [ wsinj ] the elements of @xmath602 are pairwise weakly separated . assume , for sake of contradiction , that we have @xmath641 , such that @xmath642 and @xmath643 are not weakly separated . if @xmath644 or @xmath645 , the claim is clear . thus , we may assume without loss of generality , that @xmath646 , @xmath647 , and @xmath648 . because @xmath642 and @xmath643 are not weakly separated , suppose , without loss of generality , that @xmath649 and @xmath650 such that @xmath651 are in clockwise order , and furthermore @xmath652 and @xmath653 . note that , if @xmath654 , then @xmath651 would also show that @xmath29 is not weakly separated from @xmath590 . assume that @xmath655 ; the other cases are similar . first , suppose that @xmath656 . then , we must have @xmath657 , and we obtain a similar contradiction to before . on the other hand , if @xmath658 , then @xmath659 and @xmath660 . but , since @xmath648 , @xmath62 and @xmath63 are in distinct non - intersecting edges in @xmath661 . because these edges are also in @xmath662 , we have a contradiction of the construction of @xmath76 . the lemma follows . [ atmost1j ] there is at most one @xmath663 with @xmath664 and @xmath665 . assume for sake of contradiction that we have distinct circular pairs @xmath641 , with @xmath666 , and @xmath667 . without loss of generality , assume that @xmath668 and @xmath669 . by the fact that @xmath667 and the construction of @xmath76 , there exist two points @xmath670 on the clockwise arc from @xmath63 to @xmath62 not containing its endpoints , which are both in exactly one of @xmath671 . first , if @xmath672 and @xmath673 , then the points @xmath674 force @xmath642 and @xmath590 not to be weakly separated . however , @xmath675 , so we have a contradiction . if @xmath672 and @xmath676 , then we get a similar contradiction if @xmath677 , so we have that @xmath674 are in clockwise order . because @xmath678 and @xmath679 , there must be an @xmath506 such that @xmath680 but @xmath681 . we have four cases for the position of @xmath506 , relative to @xmath674 . if @xmath682 are in clockwise order , then we get a contradiction of our construction of @xmath76 . if @xmath683 are in clockwise order , then @xmath684 either contradicts that @xmath29 is a circular pair or that @xmath29 is weakly separated from @xmath643 . the case in which @xmath685 are in clockwise order is similar . finally , if @xmath686 are in clockwise order , then either @xmath687 or @xmath688 contradicts that either @xmath29 is weakly separated from @xmath643 or that @xmath642 is weakly separated from @xmath590 . the other cases follow similarly . we can now finish the proof of proposition [ strongbound ] . by lemma [ wsinj ] , the elements of @xmath602 are pairwise weakly separated , and we also have @xmath689 . thus , by the inductive hypothesis , @xmath690 . however , it is easy to see from lemma [ atmost1j ] that @xmath691 , so the induction is complete . now , proposition [ bound ] follows easily by taking @xmath692 in proposition [ strongbound ] . proposition [ strongbound ] also has another natural corollary : for any set @xmath6 of pairwise weakly separated circular pairs , there is an injective map @xmath693 such that @xmath694 for each @xmath695 . proposition [ strongbound ] gives exactly the condition required to apply hall s marriage theorem . this work was undertaken at the reu ( research experiences for undergraduates ) program at the university of minnesota - twin cities , supported by nsf grants dms-1067183 and dms-1148634 . the authors thank joel lewis , gregg musiker , pavlo pylyavskyy , and dennis stanton for their leadership of the program , and are especially grateful to joel lewis and pavlo pylyavskyy for introducing them to this problem and for their invaluable insight and encouragement . the authors also thank to thomas mcconville for many helpful discussions . finally , the authors thank vic reiner , jonathan schneider , and dennis stanton for suggesting references , and damien jiang and ben zinberg for formatting suggestions . we now finish the proof of theorem [ circposthm ] . recall that @xmath107 is an electrical positroid for which no circular planar graph @xmath51 has @xmath696 , and that @xmath107 is chosen to be maximal among electrical positroids with this property . by assumption , @xmath107 has the @xmath115-bep for each @xmath116 , and does not have the @xmath139-bsp . furthermore , recall the construction of @xmath110 from the end of [ posproof ] . then , we have : @xmath110 is an electrical positroid , and has the @xmath139-bsp . straightforward . by assumption , @xmath111 , for some circular planar graph @xmath112 , which has a boundary spike at 1 . let @xmath113 be graph obtained after contracting the boundary spike in @xmath112 . we will prove that @xmath114 , which will yield the desired contradiction . the proof is similar to the case handled in [ posproof ] . recall the notation from definition [ betternotation ] , where we let @xmath251 denote the sequence @xmath250 . a circular pair @xmath697 is said to be * incomplete * if @xmath698 but @xmath699 and @xmath700 . if , on the other hand , @xmath54 in addition to @xmath701 and @xmath702 , @xmath29 is said to be * complete*. we also define the set @xmath252 of * primary * circular pairs as in [ posproof ] , where we take circular pairs of the form @xmath697 with the property that @xmath703 . it is easy to see that the analogue of lemma [ crossing ] holds when @xmath29 is incomplete . then , because @xmath107 has all beps , the primary circular pairs @xmath704 will all have @xmath705 . we now prove a series of lemmas , mirroring those in [ posproof ] . for an incomplete circular pair @xmath706 , any electrical positroid @xmath230 satisfying @xmath707 con @xmath228 with @xmath708 when @xmath228 is incomplete . first by axiom [ axside ] in @xmath230 , @xmath709 and @xmath710 implies that we either have our claim , or we have @xmath711 and @xmath712 . we first apply axiom [ axmid ] to @xmath713 on the circular pair @xmath714 . we have @xmath715 by definition , and we also have @xmath712 , so this implies that we either have our claim , or we have @xmath716 . the latter then implies that @xmath717 . a similar argument for axiom [ axmid ] on @xmath718 gives either our claim or that @xmath719 . then , axiom [ axmid ] implies that @xmath54 , a contradiction . thus , we have our claim . [ pcpsp ] for any incomplete circular pair @xmath29 , there exists a circular pair @xmath274 such that any electrical positroid @xmath230 satisfying @xmath707 contains @xmath29 . proceed by induction on @xmath116 , where @xmath116 is such that the first @xmath116 connections ( see definition [ connset ] ) of @xmath29 are the same as those of a primary circular pair . the base case may be handled similarly as in the proof of lemma [ pcpcont ] . now , let @xmath720 be the primary circular pair such that if @xmath721 , then @xmath722 for all @xmath116 ; @xmath723 exists by an identical argument as in the proof of lemma [ pcpcont ] . call @xmath723 the primary circular pair associated to @xmath29 . recalling that @xmath705 , we first need to show that @xmath724 . the same result replacing @xmath725 with @xmath325 would follow from an identical argument . by the definition of the @xmath130-bep , we need to show that @xmath726 . in the case that @xmath727 , we do so by applying lemmas [ crossing ] and lemma [ rtol ] . in the case that @xmath728 , we may apply the subset axiom . finally , in the case that @xmath129 , we may apply lemma [ walk ] . we now claim that , if @xmath729 , then @xmath730 . the lemma will then follow , because @xmath287 and @xmath29 are easily seen to have the same primary associated circular pair . if @xmath731 , the proof of the claim is identical to that of [ pcpcont ] , so assume that @xmath728 . in this case , we have @xmath732 . if @xmath733 , axiom [ axcross ] implies that we have @xmath734 . then , as @xmath735 , we are done by axiom [ axcross ] . [ primarybsp ] there is exactly one circular pair in @xmath252 that does not lie in @xmath107 , which we call the * @xmath107-primary circular pair . * the argument is the same to that of lemma [ unpcp ] . [ sppcp ] for any incomplete circular pair @xmath29 , any electrical positroid @xmath230 satisfying @xmath707 contains the @xmath107-primary circular pair . proceed by retrograde induction on @xmath116 , where @xmath116 is such that the first @xmath116 connections of @xmath29 are the same as those of the @xmath107-primary circular pair . if @xmath731 , we can argue exactly as in the proof of lemma [ contpcp ] . thus , assume that @xmath728 . let @xmath736 be the @xmath107-primary circular pair . by lemma [ primarybsp ] , @xmath737 has the property that @xmath722 for all @xmath116 . also , by how the construction of @xmath110 , for any circular pair @xmath738 , @xmath739 and @xmath740 . therefore , it follows that @xmath741 . then , by axiom [ axside ] , @xmath742 , and another application of axiom [ axside ] yields @xmath743 , completing the proof . [ uniclossp ] for any two incomplete circular pairs @xmath29 and @xmath322 any electrical positroid @xmath230 containing @xmath6 and contained in @xmath163 with @xmath29 must contain @xmath322 . by lemma [ pcpsp ] , @xmath230 contains the primary circular pair . the claim then follows by lemma [ sppcp ] . let @xmath744 . then , @xmath330 is an electrical positroid . the proof follows the same outline as that of lemma [ findclos ] ; here , we verify that @xmath330 satisfies each electrical positroid axiom . by construction , @xmath107 and @xmath380 only differ in the circular pairs @xmath29 for which @xmath745 . in particular , @xmath746 . @xmath330 is easily seen to satisfy the electrical positroid axioms other than [ axside ] and [ axmid ] . we first consider axiom [ axside ] : suppose that @xmath351 ; we show that either @xmath747 or @xmath748 . we have the following cases : * @xmath749 . suppose that @xmath750 . then , either @xmath751 or @xmath752 . axiom [ axcross ] applied to @xmath753 with @xmath754 gives @xmath751 . similarly , the roles of @xmath380 and @xmath107 may be swapped , and we may apply the same argument with @xmath369 . thus , either @xmath107 and @xmath380 both contain @xmath353 and @xmath369 or both do not , in which case they both contain @xmath29 and @xmath356 . * @xmath755 . suppose that @xmath750 and @xmath756 . then , @xmath757 . if @xmath751 , we are done . otherwise , if @xmath758 , as @xmath107 is an electrical positroid , we find @xmath158 and @xmath759 . then , we must have @xmath760 , in which case we are done , or either @xmath761 or @xmath762 . in the latter case , axiom [ axleft ] applied to @xmath763 with @xmath764 gives that @xmath761 . thus , @xmath107 and @xmath380 contain @xmath356 and @xmath29 , so we are done in this case as well . * the cases @xmath765 and @xmath766 are handled by similar logic ; the details are omitted . the case @xmath767 is symmetric with @xmath768 . we now consider axiom [ axmid ] : suppose that @xmath372 ; we show that either @xmath97 or @xmath769 . we have the following cases : * @xmath770 . if @xmath771 , then either @xmath772 or @xmath773 then , an application of axiom [ axcross ] to @xmath774 with @xmath754 yields that @xmath772 . the same argument holds if @xmath772 to show that @xmath771 does as well . now , suppose @xmath775 . then , either @xmath776 , which case we are done , or @xmath777 . then , the subset axiom , @xmath778 . applying axiom [ axsep ] to @xmath362 with @xmath779 then yields that @xmath776 , as desired . the same argument holds if we swap the roles of @xmath107 and @xmath380 . * @xmath780 . if @xmath771 , by the same argument as with the case @xmath781 , we have @xmath772 . if @xmath782 as well , then either @xmath776 , in which case we are done , or @xmath783 . in the latter case , because @xmath107 is an electrical positroid , @xmath784 . then , applying axiom [ axleft ] to @xmath785 with @xmath786 gives that @xmath776 , so we are done . * the cases @xmath768 and @xmath787 are handled with similar logic ; the details are omitted . we have exhausted all cases , so the proof of the lemma is complete . now , by lemma [ uniclossp ] , we have @xmath788 , so the proof of theorem [ circposthm ] is complete . recall that , to complete the proof of theorem [ lpalg ] , we need an additional technical result , which we state and prove here . [ mutlimit ] from the initial cluster of @xmath522 , mutating at a non - frozen limiting solid circular pair @xmath29 gives a new cluster variable which is a polynomial in the entries of @xmath9 , and relatively prime to @xmath29 . consider the limiting solid circular pair @xmath29 of size @xmath31 . fix the ground set @xmath789 so that @xmath20 denotes the determinant of the submatrix of @xmath9 with rows indexed by @xmath790 and columns indexed by @xmath638 . furthermore , let @xmath791 then , the cluster variable associated to the vertex @xmath29 is @xmath792 , and its corresponding exchange polynomial in the initial seed of @xmath11 is @xmath793 the new cluster variable from mutating at @xmath29 is @xmath794 where the last equality may be checked directly . we wish to show that @xmath795 is relatively prime to @xmath792 , which is irreducible , so it is enough to check that @xmath792 does not divide @xmath796 . let us outline the argument . if it is the case that @xmath792 divides @xmath797 , then each term in the expansion of @xmath797 must be divisible by a monomial in the expansion of @xmath792 . however , we claim that this can not be true . indeed , any monomial in the expansion of @xmath792 contains exactly one factor of a variable @xmath798 in the row of @xmath9 corresponding to @xmath63 , and the column of @xmath9 corresponding to @xmath799 . however , it is easily checked that there are terms of @xmath797 , after expanding and collecting like terms , containing variables @xmath800 with @xmath801 , so the claim is established . Abstract:
[ "curtis - ingerman - morrow characterize response matrices for circular planar electrical networks as symmetric square matrices with row sums zero and non - negative circular minors . in this paper , we study this positivity phenomenon more closely , from both algebraic and combinatorial perspectives . extending work of postnikov , we introduce electrical positroids , which are the sets of circular minors which can simultaneously be positive in a response matrix . we give a self - contained axiomatic description of these electrical positroids . in the second part of the paper , we discuss a naturally arising example of a laurent phenomenon algebra , as studied by lam - pylyavskyy . we investigate the clusters in this algebra , building off of initial work by kenyon - wilson , using an analogue of weak separation , as was originally introduced by leclerc - zelevinsky ." ]
15,109
15,109
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the power of multi - wavelength photometric observations to recover galaxy redshifts has been known since the late fifties @xcite and it has been confirmed in the last decade with deep blank - field imaging surveys ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? although spectroscopic redshifts are much better in precision than photometric estimates , photometry has two important advantages with respect to spectra : the number of sources that can be observed at the same time and sensitivity . indeed , with a single photometric pointing it is possible to observe a large number of sources , while in general only a limited number of objects can simultaneously be targeted with spectroscopy . in addition , the spectroscopic observation of faint targets usually requires very long exposure times ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , and the faintest objects detected in photometric maps are beyond the technical possibilities of contemporary spectrographs @xcite . photometric redshift determinations usually rely on the identification of strong features , such as the lyman or @xmath12 break , in a galaxy spectral energy distribution ( sed ) , after they are convolved with the transmission functions of the filters utilised in the observations . this is the reason why it is necessary to do a careful filter selection when planning observations , balancing depth and wavelength coverage , in order to minimise degeneracies and misidentifications when obtaining photometric redshifts . the _ james webb space telescope _ ( _ jwst _ , @xcite ) is a foremost space mission for the coming years and the awaited successor of the _ hubble space telescope ( hst ) _ and _ spitzer space telescope _ at infrared wavelengths . it will have four instruments on board for imaging , spectroscopy and coronography , covering a wide range of wavelengths from 0.6 @xmath13 through 28.3 @xmath13 with sub - arcsec angular resolution . jwst_s main scientific aims is to study the formation and evolution of galaxies at early cosmic times . for this purpose , deep blank - field imaging surveys will be carried out with two imaging cameras , namely the near infrared camera ( nircam ; * ? ? ? * ) and the mid infrared instrument ( miri ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . in the vast majority of cases , galaxy redshift determinations will be done through sed - fitting analysis and , therefore , it is crucial to understand the impact of choosing different filter combinations on the ability to recover the right redshifts for all the observed sources . nircam s filter wheels include eight broad - band filters , namely f070w , f090w , f115w , f150w , f200w , f277w , f356w and f444w , as well as a number of medium and narrow - band filters , covering the wavelength range @xmath0 . the miri imager contains nine different broad - band filters between 5 and 28 @xmath14 m . this latter wavelength range encompasses the redshifted stellar light of high-@xmath6 galaxies , as well as the hot dust radiation emitted by low-@xmath6 sources . the two shortest - wavelength bands that we consider here ( i.e. , f560w and f770w ) are the most sensitive in miri , so will be those primarily used for high-@xmath6 galaxy studies . the complementarity of nircam s and miri s wavelength coverages makes that both cameras should ideally be considered for deep galaxy surveys . while surveys with nircam alone will be sufficient to encompass the @xmath12 break of galaxies at @xmath15 , a secure measurement of the evolved stellar light ( around rest @xmath16 ) in @xmath17 galaxies will also require observations with the miri filters . however , due to different detector technology in the near- and mid - ir range , miri s sensitivity is significantly lower than that of nircam , making observers doubt whether it is convenient to invest time on long miri observations when planning deep galaxy surveys . at the same time , the lack of _ jwst _ coverage below @xmath18 requires considering whether observing fields with no ancillary shorter wavelength imaging can be effective to study galaxy evolution . here we address these issues through the analysis of galaxy redshift recovery in different data availability situations , all treated on an equal basis , in order to allow the reader decide which camera and filter configuration would be optimal for their scientific interests . the aim of this work is to assess the impact of different _ jwst _ broad - band filter combinations on recovering reliable photometric redshifts for galaxies at @xmath4 . in addition to considering the nircam broad bands and miri f560w and f770w filters , we tested the need of ancillary data at @xmath5 , such as those provided by _ hst _ observations . we applied our tests to three different galaxy samples with known redshifts : 1 ) a spectroscopic galaxy sample at @xmath19 ; 2 ) a galaxy sample with consensus photometric redshifts at @xmath20 from the candels survey ; and 3 ) a mock galaxy sample generated with different spectral templates at @xmath21 , 8 , 9 and 10 . the structure of the paper is as follows . in section [ sec : samples ] we describe our three sample selection , the obtention of photometry in the relevant nircam and miri bands , and photometric redshift test methodology . in section [ sec : results ] we analyse our results at different redshifts , while in section [ sec : conclusions ] we summarize our main findings and conclusions . throughout this paper , we adopt a cosmology with @xmath2270 @xmath23 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 . all magnitudes refer to the ab system @xcite . we selected three different galaxy samples spanning rather complementary redshift ranges : 1 . a sample of 2422 galaxies with secure spectroscopic redshifts at @xmath19 ; 2 . a sample of 1375 galaxies with consensus photometric redshifts at @xmath20 ; 3 . a sample of 2124 simulated galaxies at @xmath7 . these three samples allowed us to investigate the different problems arising when trying to recover redshifts photometrically using different combinations of _ jwst _ filters . by no means are these samples trying to emulate a complete , flux - limited galaxy population at @xmath4 as it will be seen in a blank _ jwst _ field , and this is not necessary given the scope of this paper . our first galaxy sample contains 2422 galaxies with secure spectroscopic redshifts ( @xmath26 ) from the eso public compilation in the chandra deep field south ( cdfs ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , and from @xcite . in order to obtain multiwavelength photometry for these galaxies , we crossmatched this sample with the public cosmic assembly near - infrared deep extragalactic legacy survey ( candels ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) catalogue for the great observatory origins deep survey south field ( goods - s ) obtained by @xcite . this catalogue contains photometry in 17 broad bands , from 0.37 @xmath14 m through 8.0 @xmath14 m , obtained with ground - based and space telescopes , including _ hst _ and _ spitzer _ @xcite . this wavelength sampling allows for a good - quality sed fitting of the galaxy stellar emission and a proper redshift recovery in the vast majority of cases , using standard galaxy spectral templates and photometric redshift codes . our aim here is to assess the impact of choosing different _ jwst _ filter sets on the derived photometric redshifts , rather than the performance of different photometric redshift codes and/or sed template libraries . therefore , we explicitly excluded from our analysis any galaxy from the parent spectroscopic sample for which we could not correctly recover the redshift photometrically using all the candels photometry up to @xmath27 . we did not use the two irac band data at longer wavelengths because their @xmath28 is considerably lower than for the other bands and they could be contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emission at low @xmath6 . the excluded galaxies are only @xmath29 of all the galaxies with publicly available @xmath26 in the cdfs . to obtain photometric redshift estimates for all the galaxies in the parent spectroscopic sample , we ran the public code _ lephare _ @xcite using templates from bruzual & charlot ( 2003 ; bc03 hereafter ) with solar metallicity , a range of exponentially declining star formation histories with different characteristic times @xmath30 from 0.01 to 10 gyr and ages from 0.01 to 10 gyr . we allowed for emission lines in _ lephare _ , and applied the calzetti et al . reddening law @xcite with @xmath31 extinction values from 0 to 4 . we considered the subsample of 2422 objects with resulting photometric redshifts within 2@xmath32 ( @xmath330.13 ) of the spectroscopic redshifts ( fig . [ fig : zspec ] ) , which constitute 92% of the parent spectroscopic sample , and adopted it as our sample 1 for all further analysis . the sample 1 redshift distribution is shown in figure [ fig : zdist ] . this distribution peaks around @xmath34 and has a high-@xmath6 tail up to @xmath35 , although the statistics are rather poor at @xmath17 . so , our main purpose with sample 1 is to study the percentage of low - redshift galaxies that can leak to high @xmath6 when different filter sets , and thus different wavelength coverages , are available . our second sample consists of 1375 galaxies at @xmath20 taken from the candels goods - s public catalogue . for this sample , we considered as fiducial redshifts the consensus photometric redshifts that have been compiled by @xcite . the candels consensus photometric redshifts result from the comparison of 11 independent sed fitting runs . we considered only candels galaxies with @xmath17 here , as lower redshifts are well represented in our sample 1 . as we did for the sample with spectroscopic redshifts ( sample 1 ) , we obtained our own photometric redshifts by running _ lephare _ on the candels 15-band photometry and using the same sed templates and parameter values stated before . in this case , our own photometric redshifts agree within 2@xmath32 ( @xmath330.10 ) with the candels consensus redshifts for 1375 ( 95% ) of the goods - s galaxies with candels redshifts @xmath36 ( fig . [ fig : zphot ] ) , consistently with the typical level of dispersion present in the individual sed fitting candels runs . we adopted these 1375 galaxies as our sample 2 . the resulting redshift distribution is shown in figure [ fig : zdist ] . we built our third sample with mock galaxies at fixed redshifts z@xmath37 and @xmath38 ( for an analysis of more redshifts see appendix [ sec : appa ] ) , simulating their seds with two different methods . firstly , we considered the bc03 synthetic galaxy templates with four metallicities ( z@xmath39 , 0.4 z@xmath39 , 0.2 z@xmath39 , and 0.02 z@xmath39 ) , exponentially declining star formation histories and five different ages , depending on redshift . we applied dust extinction by using the calzetti et al . reddening law with @xmath40 , and the effect of absorption by the intergalactic medium ( igm ; * ? ? ? the bc03 models do not include emission lines , so we manually added the @xmath41 , @xmath42 , [ oiii]5007 @xmath43 and [ oii]3727 @xmath43 emission lines to those templates for which the age is equal or lower than the characterisitic @xmath30 of the exponentially declining star formation history , as follows . we started from the observed mean value of the @xmath44[nii]@xmath45[sii ] equivalent width ( ew ) , which is 422 - 423 @xmath46 at @xmath47 @xcite . then , we assumed line ratios from @xcite in order to derive the equivalent widths of @xmath48 alone at different metallicities . @xcite obtained a relation between @xmath41 equivalent width and redshift , namely ew@xmath49 @xmath50 , which has been checked to be consistent with observations up to @xmath51 @xcite . ew by a factor @xmath52 . ] following this relation , we derived ew(@xmath41 ) for all considered redshifts . we also derived equivalent widths for @xmath42 assuming case b recombination and the corresponding equivalent widths for [ oiii ] and [ oii ] by using the line ratios tabulated in @xcite . we explicitly decided not to include the ly@xmath53 line because the importance of its emission in galaxies at @xmath54 is still unclear ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . finally , we normalised every model at 29 ab mag at 1.5@xmath14 m ( corresponding to the nircam f150w filter pivot wavelength ) . the complete list of adopted parameter values is summarized in table [ tab : param ] , while some sed examples at z@xmath557 are shown in figure [ fig : sed_z7 ] . our sample contains a total of 864 galaxies , corresponding to 240 bc03-based sed models at each redshift 7 and 8 , and 192 sed models at each redshift 9 and 10 . for each model , we considered independently three possible @xmath28 values ( @xmath56 and 10 ) for the flux corresponding to [ f150w]=29 ab mag . the @xmath28 values of the photometry in all other bands have been scaled as we explain in [ sec - jwstphotmeas ] . cc [ ] metallicity & z@xmath39 , 0.4z@xmath39 , 0.2z@xmath39,0.02z@xmath57 + sfh @xmath30 [ gyr ] & 0.01,0.1,1,10 + a@xmath58 & 0,0.5,1 + age [ gyr ] & 0.01,0.05,0.2,0.4,0.6 + @xmath6 & 7,8,9,10 + @xmath28 & 3,5,10 + secondly , we simulated further @xmath7 galaxy seds with the population synthesis code _ yggdrasil _ @xcite , which has been especially conceived to model high - redshift galaxies . we used a set of parameter values similar to the ones used for the bc03 templates , except that the star formation histories are somewhat different , consisting of a step function for which the duration of the constant star formation period is set as a free parameter . and , in addition to the normal stellar templates , we adopted also a template with a metal - free , population - iii single stellar population @xcite . in all cases , we considered the two possible extreme gas covering factors , namely @xmath59 and 1 . the complete list of adopted parameter values is given in table [ tab : paramygg ] . we show four sed template examples for @xmath21 galaxies in figure [ fig : sed_z7_ygg ] . the _ yggdrasil _ models include the effects of nebular line and continuum emission , so we did not need to add any extra line manually as we did for the bc03 templates . we did include the effect of dust reddening and igm absorption in the same way as for the bc03 models . we removed the ly@xmath60 emission line from the _ yggdrasil _ models , because its presence and importance is debated at @xmath54 , as we explained before . once again , we normalised every sed template to [ f150w]=29 mag at 1.5 @xmath14 m . our _ yggdrasil _ simulated sample comprises a total of 1260 galaxies , corresponding to 342 sed models at each redshift 7 and 8 , and 288 sed models at each redshift 9 and 10 . the complete redshift distribution of our galaxy sample 3 , simulated both with the bc03 and _ yggdrasil _ templates , is shown in fig . [ fig : zdist ] . cc[ht ! ] metallicity & z@xmath39,0.4z@xmath39,0.2z@xmath39,0.02z@xmath39,0 + constant sfh for [ myr ] & 10,30,100 + a@xmath58 & 0,0.5,1 + age [ gyr ] & 0.01,0.05,0.2,0.4,0.6 + @xmath61 & 0,1 + @xmath6 & 7,8,9,10 + @xmath28 & 3,5,10 + based on the best - fit seds obtained running _ lephare _ on the candels photometry for the galaxies in samples 1 and 2 , and the simulated seds for our mock galaxies in sample 3 , we measured the photometry expected at the 8 nircam broad bands and the two miri broad bands f560w and f770w for all our galaxies ( see table [ tab : filters ] for a summary of the different _ jwst _ filters considered in this work ) . our procedure to interpolate / extrapolate the _ jwst _ photometry is similar for our three galaxy samples . the main difference is that in samples 1 and 2 , we simply adopted @xmath28 values for the photometry scaled from the candels photometry , while for sample 3 we tested three different @xmath28 values in a controlled manner , in order to assess the effect of @xmath28 on our results . as a first step , for every galaxy in our real galaxy samples ( samples 1 and 2 ) , we derived nircam broad - band fluxes by convolving the best - fit sed template with the transmission curve of each _ jwst _ filter @xcite . to each flux , we assigned an error bar corresponding to a @xmath28 equal to that of the closest filter in the candels catalogue . we adopted as nircam flux a random value ( selected from a uniform distribution ) within the corresponding error bar . note that , in practice , nircam will reach the depth of the _ hst _ candels photometry in very short integration times , so the @xmath28 achieved for candels galaxies in typically deep nircam surveys will be higher than what we consider here . however , our assumed @xmath28 are already sufficiently high in most cases : virtually all galaxies in sample 1 and more than 90% of galaxies in sample 2 have @xmath62 in their derived nircam f150w photometry . thus , our results derived here for these real galaxy samples are mostly independent of @xmath28 , as we explain below ( the low @xmath28 effect will be more clearly manifested in our sample 3 , where we explicitly set three different @xmath28 values for each template , including a low value @xmath63 ) . as a second step , we measured the photometry expected at the miri bands for our sample 1 and 2 galaxies , which results from the extrapolation of the best - fit template redward of the candels irac @xmath27 coverage . we convolved the best sed model with the two miri bands transmission curves @xcite . to each miri band flux , we assigned an error bar corresponding to a @xmath28 scaled using as reference the @xmath28 in the nircam f150w band : we assumed that a miri f560w or f770w flux corresponding to a magnitude 28 ( ab ) would have the same @xmath28 as a nircam f150w flux corresponding to 29 mag ( whose @xmath28 was , in turn , scaled assuming that the ` measured ' nircam f150w flux @xmath28 for each galaxy was the same as the real candels _ hst _ f160w flux @xmath28 ) . fixing the @xmath28 in the nircam and miri photometry implicitly assumes specific integration times with the _ jwst _ instruments . in practice , this assumption does not matter , as our results will be equally valid for any galaxies with similar @xmath28 values , independently of the miri fluxes at which these @xmath28 are reached . finally , we randomised every flux within its own error bar . ccc[ht ! ] nircam / f070w & 0.70 & 0.18 + nircam / f090w & 0.90 & 0.23 + nircam / f115w & 1.15 & 0.30 + nircam / f150w & 1.50 & 0.38 + nircam / f200w & 1.99 & 0.53 + nircam / f277w & 2.77 & 0.82 + nircam / f356w & 3.56 & 0.99 + nircam / f444w & 4.41 & 1.29 + miri / f560w & 5.60 & 1.41 + miri / f770w & 7.70 & 2.30 + ccccccccccc[ht ! ] 10 & 30.2 & 30.5 & 30.6 & 30.7 & 30.9 & 30.9 & 30.7 & 30.2 & 29.7 & 29.7 + 5 & 29.4 & 29.7 & 29.9 & 30.0 & 30.2 & 30.2 & 30.0 & 29.4 & 29.0 & 29.0 + 3 & 28.9 & 29.2 & 29.3 & 29.4 & 29.6 & 29.6 & 29.4 & 28.9 & 28.4 & 28.4 + for sample 3 with mock galaxies , we convolved every simulated sed template with the transmission curve of each nircam filter . in our sample every sed template is considered three times , in order to apply three fixed , reference @xmath28 values ( 10 , 5 and 3 ) to the nircam f150w fluxes . we assumed the same integration times for all the other nircam bands and took into account the differences in filter sensitivities to assign @xmath28 in each band . a different strategy that assumes the same observational depth for all nircam bands is presented in appendix [ sec : appb ] . we considered every flux below the @xmath64 level as a non - detection . the 2@xmath32 detection limits in each band for each fixed reference @xmath28 value at f150w are listed in table [ tab : ston_levels ] . note that , as a conservative approach , we adopted @xmath65 flux upper limits ( rather than @xmath64 ) in all cases of non - detections for running the @xmath3 code , as it is explained below . finally , we obtained 10 random realisations of each nircam band flux within the corresponding error bar . note that , in contrast , for samples 1 and 2 we considered a single realisation of each flux , simply because in the case of real galaxies the nircam fluxes are well constrained by interpolation of the candels fluxes , so their error bars are typically smaller than in sample 3 . in a similar way , we derived fluxes in the miri bands by convolving all sed templates in the sample with the two miri filter transmission curves . then , we scaled each miri flux @xmath28 , such that a mag@xmath6628 in miri has the same @xmath28 as a nircam magnitude [ f150w]=29 . this is a realistic assumption of how the nircam and miri data will typically be matched . as for the nircam bands , we randomised every miri flux 10 times within its own error bar . with the expected _ jwst _ photometry measured on the galaxy templates for the three samples , we could test how accurately it is possible to derive photometric redshifts by using different _ jwst _ band combinations . the band combinations that we analysed in this work are : * 8 nircam broad bands * _ hst _ f435w , f606w and 8 nircam broad bands * vlt @xmath67 band , f435w , _ hst _ f606w and 8 nircam broad bands * 8 nircam broad bands and 2 miri bands ( f560w and f770w ) * 8 nircam broad bands and miri f560w only * 8 nircam broad bands and miri f770w only * _ hst _ f435w , f606w , 8 nircam broad bands and 2 miri bands * _ hst _ f435w , f606w , 8 nircam broad bands and miri f560w * _ hst _ f435w , f606w , 8 nircam broad bands and miri f770w these different filter combinations have been chosen to test in which cases the nircam broad bands alone are sufficient to recover good photometric redshifts and in which cases the miri bands can improve these estimates . because miri is considerably less sensitive than nircam , much longer integration times are necessary to reach comparable depths . thus , many observing programs may opt for using a single miri filter ( f560w or f770w ) rather than both of them . this is why we tested separately the cases in which a single and both miri bands are used . in addition , we analysed the cases in which two short - wavelength _ hst _ bands and the @xmath67 band are included . all these bands are beyond _ jwst_s wavelength coverage , so they can not be substituted with any _ jwst _ band . we used the candels catalogue to recover observations in these bands for galaxies in samples 1 and 2 . we ignored these bands for sample 3 : they are irrelevant , as the lyman break is completely contained within the nircam wavelength range at @xmath68 . we note that _ lephare _ has been run using the native bc03 models allowing the code to incorporate emission lines with its own prescription in the cases of samples 1 and 2 ( as it is described in section [ sec - sample1 ] ) . for our mock galaxies in sample 3 , we ran _ lephare _ using directly our own customised templates , i.e. , the bc03 templates with emission lines incorporated as explained in section [ sec_sample3descr ] and the _ yggdrasil _ templates . in addition , in the _ lephare _ runs for sample 3 we also included some older galaxy models ( as in samples 1 and 2 ) , and allowed for extinction values from @xmath69 to 4 in all cases , in order to test whether there could be degeneracies between redshift and dust / age produced in the photometric fitting . this consideration of a wide range of redshifts , ages and extinction values emulates the real situation in which one simply has a photometric input catalogue without knowing a priori which sources are at high or low redshifts . no extra consideration of emission lines has been allowed for sample 3 in _ lephare _ , as our young - galaxy models already account for them . for all the filter combinations we ran _ lephare _ on the three galaxy samples , in order to recover the galaxy photometric redshifts and compare them with the fiducial redshift available for each galaxy . in the filter combinations with miri bands in samples 1 and 2 , and all cases for sample 3 , we chose the median photometric redshift of the 10 iterations done for each object ( corresponding to different variations in the photometry , as explained above ) . for each sample and filter set combination , in section [ sec : results ] we quote the resulting mean value of the normalised redshift difference distribution @xmath70 and the r.m.s . ( @xmath32 ) of the _ normalised _ absolute redshift difference distribution @xmath71 . note that , although we computed @xmath32 independently for each sample and broad - band combination , we considered as reference to define outliers a single @xmath32 value per sample ( the minimum obtained with all the filter sets ) . this allows us to directly compare how the outlier fractions change among the different filter combinations . we warn the reader that the specific values of the statistical quantities ( @xmath32 , outlier percentages ) quoted in this paper refer to the samples analysed here and may have variations for other galaxy samples with different redshifts and sed type distributions . even so , as all our tests are internally consistent , our results constitute a useful reference to assess the ability to recover galaxy redshifts using different _ jwst _ filter combinations and ancillary data . in this section we present our results for the three galaxy samples analysed in this work . ccccc[ht ! ] 8 nircam broad bands & 134 ( 10.3% ) & -0.024 & 0.115 + _ hst _ f435w + _ hst _ f606w + 8 nircam bands & 93 ( 7.1% ) & -0.032 & 0.076 + vlt @xmath67 + _ hst _ f435w , f606w + 8 nircam & 89 ( 6.8% ) & -0.043 & 0.058 + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w , f770w & 116 ( 8.9% ) & -0.037 & 0.066 + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w & 120 ( 9.2% ) & -0.029 & 0.077 + 8 nircam bands + miri f770w & 128 ( 9.8% ) & -0.037 & 0.067 + _ hst _ f435w , f606w + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w , f770w & 109 ( 8.3% ) & -0.042 & 0.062 + _ hst _ f435w , f606w + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w & 93 ( 7.1% ) & -0.034 & 0.060 + _ hst _ f435w , f606w + 8 nircam bands + miri f770w & 106 ( 8.1% ) & -0.042 & 0.064 + in figures [ fig : nircam_hst_u_zspec ] to [ fig : nircam_hst_miri_zspec ] we show the comparison between the spectroscopic and our derived photometric redshifts obtained with different filter combinations for sample 1 . for each case , we quote the mean of the @xmath72 distribution and the r.m.s . of @xmath73 , computed considering all galaxies in the sample . we identified 3@xmath32 outliers using as reference @xmath330.058 , which is the minimum of all the @xmath32 values that we get for sample 1 . this galaxy sample is particularly useful to test the percentage of low-@xmath6 galaxies ( @xmath74 ) that leak to wrong redshifts due to failures in the redshift recovery . the percentages of these low-@xmath6 sources that are leaking outliers for each filter combination is listed in table [ tab : contamination ] . for this analysis , we considered only the redshift bin @xmath75 , avoiding lower @xmath6 galaxies , as the miri filters are not very suitable to trace the direct stellar emission at such low @xmath6 . note that , although these obtained outlier percentages apply particularly to this galaxy sample , the changes obtained with different passbands are of general validity and show the impact of incorporating different filters on the redshift recovery . firstly , we analysed the case of using the 8 nircam broad bands with and without ancillary _ hst _ and ground - based @xmath67-band data ( figure [ fig : nircam_hst_u_zspec ] ) . we found that , when using only the 8 nircam broad bands , the percentage of @xmath75 sources that are @xmath65 outliers is of 10.3% , including several extreme cases which appear as @xmath17 contaminants . besides , the r.m.s . of the @xmath73 distribution is high ( @xmath76 ) compared with the typical precision that can currently be achieved for low-@xmath6 galaxies in deep surveys . when adding shorter - wavelength _ hst _ data , the normalised redshift difference distribution r.m.s . is significanlty lower , the outlier percentage decreases to 7.1% , and the majority of the most extreme redshift outliers are corrected . when adding also the @xmath67 band , the r.m.s . reaches a minimum ( @xmath77 ) and so does the outlier percentage ( 6.8% ) , leaving basically no catastrophic outlier cases . this is because it is necessary to cover wavelengths shorter than @xmath78 in order to distinguish between the lyman and @xmath12 breaks at @xmath79 . the improvement on the photometric redshift estimation is also due to the mere increase in the wavelength coverage given by the larger number of bands . besides , the incorporation of the _ hst _ and @xmath67-band data to the nircam photometry reduces the photometric redshift dispersion ( @xmath32 ) to about a half ( fig . [ fig : nircam_hst_u_zspec ] ) . secondly , we tested the photometric redshift estimation when complementing the nircam photometry with miri photometry , instead of shorter wavelength data ( figure [ fig : nircam_miri_zspec ] ) . when we incorporate both miri f560w and f770w bands , the resulting normalised redshift difference distribution r.m.s . is significantly lower ( @xmath80 ) than in the case with nircam data alone , indicating that the presence of miri photometry can mitigate the absence of short - wavelength data . ( table [ tab : contamination ] ) . lastly , we considered the situation in which _ hst _ ancillary data along with nircam and miri data are available ( figure [ fig : nircam_hst_miri_zspec ] ) . we explicitly tested a combination without @xmath67-band photometry , as ground - based @xmath67-band observations with matching depth to _ jwst _ observations will be time - consuming and difficult to achieve . the results are rather similar to the case with nircam and miri bands considered together : the obtained r.m.s . is @xmath81 , with the fraction of redshift outliers being slightly reduced . interestingly , when only nircam and miri photometry are considered , the f770w data improves the overall redshift statistics . instead , when _ hst _ data are also available , the incorporation of f560w alone provides slightly better results . ( this is related to how the @xmath82-fitting procedure works , typically giving more weight to longer wavelength data where the sources are brighter ) . to conclude , the 8 nircam broad bands alone are not adequate to obtain sufficiently good photometric redshifts at @xmath74 . although for most galaxies the derived redshifts are correct , the overall obtained statistics is poor compared with the typical @xmath3 quality that can currently be achieved in deep surveys at these redshifts . observations at wavelengths shorter than @xmath78 are necessary to remove the most extreme redshift outliers . incorporating miri longer - wavelength photometry instead can mitigate the absence of short - wavelength observations . having a complete optical and infrared coverage up to @xmath83 will allow us to keep the @xmath74 redshift statistics well under control . ccccc[ht ! ] 8 nircam broad bands & 190 ( 21.4@xmath84 ) & 46 ( 9.4@xmath84 ) & -0.111 & 0.218 + _ hst _ f435w , f606w + 8 nircam bands & 21 ( 2.4@xmath84 ) & 36 ( 8.0@xmath84 ) & -0.023 & 0.119 + vlt @xmath67 + _ hst _ f435w , f606w+ 8 nircam bands & 23 ( 2.6@xmath84 ) & 37 ( 8.2@xmath84 ) & -0.024 & 0.122 + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w , f770w & 68 ( 7.7@xmath84 ) & 14 ( 3.1@xmath84 ) & -0.034 & 0.099 + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w & 120 ( 13.5@xmath84 ) & 41 ( 9.1@xmath84 ) & -0.072 & 0.169 + 8 nircam bands + miri f770w & 90 ( 10.1@xmath84 ) & 31 ( 6.9@xmath84 ) & -0.049 & 0.127 + _ hst _ f435w , f606w + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w , f770w & 11 ( 1.2@xmath84 ) & 7 ( 1.4@xmath84 ) & -0.004 & 0.065 + _ hst _ f435w , f606w + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w & 20 ( 2.2@xmath84 ) & 32 ( 6.6@xmath84 ) & -0.019 & 0.113 + _ hst _ f435w , f606w + 8 nircam bands + miri f770w & 17 ( 1.9@xmath84 ) & 18 ( 4.0@xmath84 ) & -0.011 & 0.083 + in figures [ fig : nircam_hst_u ] to [ fig : nircam_hst_miri ] we show the comparison between our recovered photometric redshifts and fiducial candels consensus redshifts for galaxies in sample 2 ( all of which have fiducial redshifts @xmath17 ) . as we did before , we derived @xmath71 for all our galaxies and we identified 3@xmath32 outliers , where we adopted @xmath85 , which is the smallest r.m.s . value that we obtained with the different filter combinations . the percentages of outliers in each case are listed in table [ tab : outliers ] . crrrr[ht ! ] 8 nircam broad bands & 1 ( @xmath86 ) & 24 ( @xmath87 ) & 20 ( 3.5% ) & 87 ( 10.1% ) + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w , f770w & 1 ( @xmath86 ) & 5 ( @xmath88 ) & 3 ( 0.5% ) & 26 ( 3.0% ) + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w & 1 ( @xmath86 ) & 7 ( @xmath89 ) & 3 ( 0.5% ) & 29 ( 3.4% ) + 8 nircam bands + miri f770w & 2 ( @xmath90 ) & 16 ( @xmath91 ) & 14 ( 2.4% ) & 45 ( 5.2% ) + crrrr[ht ! ] 8 nircam bands & 11 ( 0.9% ) & 257 ( 20.4% ) & 118 ( 49.2% ) & 560 ( 44.4% ) + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w , f770w & 1 ( 0.1% ) & 152 ( 12.1% ) & 41 ( 17.1% ) & 462 ( 36.7% ) + 8 nircam bands + miri f560w & 13 ( 1.0% ) & 188 ( 14.9% ) & 68 ( 28.3% ) & 490 ( 38.9% ) + 8 nircam bands + miri f770w & 8 ( 0.6% ) & 196 ( 15.6% ) & 79 ( 32.9% ) & 508 ( 40.3% ) + as for sample 1 , our first step consisted of analysing the resulting photometric redshifts obtained using the 8 nircam broad bands with and without the _ hst _ and @xmath67-band data ( figure [ fig : nircam_hst_u ] ) . we found that when using only the 8 nircam broad bands the percentage of outliers for sample 2 is high . we did not show the percentage of low-@xmath6 contaminants because of the sample selection , which by construction only has @xmath17 objects . the most evident effect in sample 2 is the leakage of high-@xmath6 sources to low-@xmath6 values produced by the insufficient photometric coverage . this is particularly important for galaxies with input redshifts @xmath92 : a bit more than 20% of them are found @xmath93 away at lower redshifts ( table [ tab : outliers ] ) . the redshift estimation is better at higher redshifts ( @xmath94 ) . the percentage of sources leaking to lower @xmath6 is of only @xmath95 . as we discussed before , the lyman break enters the shortest - wavelength nircam band at @xmath96 , and therefore , the degeneracy between the @xmath12 and lyman breaks occurs mainly at lower redshifts . for this reason , adding the _ hst _ f435w and 606w photometry does not have an important effect on the redshift estimation at these higher redshifts , but it does at @xmath92 , where it reduces the percentage of leaking sources to only @xmath97 . the overall redshift distribution dispersion reduces to a half when the _ hst _ data is considered along the nircam photometry ( fig . [ fig : nircam_hst_u ] ) . the addition of the @xmath67 band does not produce any obvious effect in the redshift estimation for sample 2 , once the _ hst _ photometry is also considered . the role of the @xmath67 band is more important for identifying low - redshift contaminants rather than preventing the leakage of high-@xmath6 sources to low @xmath6 , because galaxies at z@xmath984 are very faint or not detected in this band . as we will discuss later , the _ hst _ optical bands have a similar effect at z@xmath985 . as a second step , we obtained photometric redshifts with the 8 nircam broad bands and two miri bands f560w and f770w , considered together and one at a time ( figure [ fig : nircam_miri ] ) . adding both miri bands significantly improves the photometric redshift estimates by decreasing the percentage of leaking sources to @xmath99 at @xmath92 and @xmath100 at @xmath94 . among the remaining @xmath92 leaking sources , some are placed at @xmath34 and a few at higher redshifts , i.e. , @xmath101 . when considering one miri band at a time , f770w appears to be more effective at improving the photometric redshift estimation than f560w , but it is the combined effect of both miri bands which produces the substantial reduction in the fraction of leaking galaxies . adding miri photometry appears to be more important than adding _ hst _ photometry to minimise the dispersion in the obtained redshift distribution : the resulting r.m.s . in the case of nircam and miri data is @xmath102 , which is slightly lower than for the _ hst _ and nircam filter combination ( @xmath103 ) . lastly , we considered _ hst _ , nircam and miri photometry altogether to obtain photometric redshifts ( figure [ fig : nircam_hst_miri ] ) . as expected , using all these bands jointly provides the best results in the identification of z@xmath104 galaxies . the presence of _ hst _ photometry at @xmath105 helps to correctly identify the lyman break at @xmath92 , while the miri mid - infrared bands provide a better wavelength coverage to correctly identify sources at z@xmath106 . the resulting redshift dispersion gets a minimum value of @xmath85 and the fraction of @xmath92 sources leaking beyond @xmath65 in redshift decreases to @xmath107 . as before , the miri f770w filter appears to have a more important role in improving the redshift estimation than miri f560w , but both bands are necessary to properly identify all galaxies at @xmath20 . to sum up , the short - wavelength _ hst _ data and long - wavelength miri data have complementary roles in the correct identification of @xmath17 galaxies . we remind the reader that the photometry in our samples 1 and 2 is of good quality ( @xmath108 in f150w for the vast majority of galaxies ; see section [ sec - jwstphotmeas ] ) . the redshift outlier percentages that we quote here correspond to this high - quality photometry , so they do not depend on the data quality , but are rather produced by the intrinsic limitations of the sed fitting with a limited number of photometric bands . we checked the @xmath28 of the photometry for the @xmath3 outliers and found no significant difference with respect to the photometry of all other sources , confirming that samples 1 and 2 results are not affected by the photometric @xmath28 . with sample 3 we aim to test the ability to recover photometric redshifts for simulated galaxies at @xmath7 , using the nircam broad bands alone and in conjunction with the miri f560w and f770w bands . for this sample , we did not consider the incorporation of the _ hst _ short - wavelength and @xmath67 filters , because these bands map rest wavelengths far blueward of the lyman break at these redshifts , so they basically correspond to non - detections in all cases . figures [ fig : z7_stn10 ] to [ fig : z7_stn3 ] show the distributions of the recovered photometric redshifts for each input redshift ( @xmath109 and 10 ) for the sample 3 galaxies simulated with the bc03 templates , obtained by running _ lephare _ with different _ jwst _ filter combinations . as in this case the input redshifts are four fixed values , it is clearer to show the output @xmath3 distributions for each input redshift rather than @xmath110 plots , which would contain four vertical columns each . as before , in each plot we quote the mean value of the normalised redshift difference distribution @xmath70 , taking into account all galaxies . however , for sample 3 galaxies , we adapted our method for the r.m.s . calculation . as it can be seen in figures [ fig : z7_stn10 ] to [ fig : z7_stn3 ] , the sample 3 redshift histograms are characterised by quite a narrow distribution around the main peak and the presence of some catastrophic failures producing secondary peaks at much lower redshifts . these catastrophic redshift failures would significantly bias the computed @xmath32 of @xmath71 if they were considered in the statistics . so , for sample 3 galaxies ( both based on the bc03 and _ yggdrasil _ models ) we explicitly excluded all galaxies with @xmath111 for the @xmath32 computation , and we considered those excluded galaxies to be the outliers of our sample . we provide the statistics on the outlier fractions for the bc03-sed galaxies in table [ tab : outliers_z7 ] . for @xmath112 , the 8 nircam broad bands alone allowed us to derive accurate redshift estimates , with mean values for the redshift distributions close to 0 and @xmath113 at all redshifts ( fig . [ fig : z7_stn10 ] ) . the percentage of outliers quoted in table [ tab : outliers_z7 ] is very small ( @xmath86 ) . adding miri photometry to the nircam photometry only slightly enhances the already excellent quality of the output redshifts , resulting in @xmath114 at all redshifts . these results indicate that the incorporation of the miri photometry to the nircam photometry has in practice little effect to derive photometric redshifts for @xmath7 galaxies with bc03-like seds when the nircam @xmath28 is very high . the miri effect to the photometric redshift estimation is more evident at @xmath115 ( fig . [ fig : z7_stn5 ] ) . the nircam data alone are sufficient for a reasonably good redshift recovery ( @xmath116 ) , but the addition of miri data improves the photometric redshift quality , taking the outlier percentage to @xmath117 ( when f560w photometry is included ) . inspection of fig . [ fig : sed_z7 ] suggests that this is a k - correction effect : galaxies are brighter in the miri bands either because they are old or because of the presence of emission lines . indeed , both effects are important . in fig . [ fig : z7_stn5el ] we show separately our results only for galaxies with emission lines : it can be seen that the effect of incorporating the miri photometry is similar as in the general case with @xmath115 . note that , on the one hand , the presence of emission lines helps in the redshift identification , but on the other hand having prominent emission lines in contiguous broad bands makes the observed photometry mimic a less featured sed , resulting in a more difficult redshift recovery . in the case of @xmath63 at f150w ( fig . [ fig : z7_stn3 ] ) , assuming identical integration times in all nircam filters implies that some galaxies are undetected at the shortest wavelength nircam bands . in this case , having complementary miri photometry becomes very important , even with the assumption that we made here , i.e. , that the miri depth will be one magnitude shallower than the nircam depth at @xmath118 . this assumption is reasonable , as achieving the same depth as in nircam will require too long exposure times times longer with miri than with nircam ; see http://jwstetc.stsci.edu/etc/ ] . the result of this poorer - quality photometry is that the output redshift distributions are broader and secondary peaks at lower redshifts become more significant ( fig [ fig : z7_stn3 ] ) . the incorporation of miri photometry has a significant effect in reducing the overall outlier fraction : it goes down from 10.1% with nircam data only to @xmath119 after adding the two miri bands ( table [ tab : outliers_z7 ] ) . note that , among the two miri filters , f560w appears to have a more important effect in improving the @xmath3 determination of the bc03-sed sources at @xmath7 . as a summary , we conclude that considering miri photometry of one magnitude shallower depth than the nircam photometry keeps the fraction of @xmath3 outliers low for the @xmath68 galaxies which have a moderate or low @xmath28 in the nircam images . this effect is evident for different sed types ( with or without emission lines ) . figures [ fig : z7_yggsn10 ] to [ fig : z7_yggsn3 ] show the distributions of the recovered photometric redshifts for the sample 3 galaxies simulated with the _ yggdrasil _ templates at each fixed redshift , obtained by running _ lephare _ with different _ jwst _ filter combinations . the outlier percentages for each analysed @xmath28 value are listed in table [ tab : outliers_z7_ygg ] . _ yggdrasil _ templates are more complex than the bc03 ones , given that _ yggdrasil _ automatically incorporates nebular emission lines and continuum emission when galaxy ages are young and the gas covering factor is @xmath120 , which may be the case of many high-@xmath6 galaxies . when considering objects with @xmath112 at f150w ( figure [ fig : z7_yggsn10 ] ) , we see that the nircam data alone provides a good photometric redshift recovery ( @xmath121 ) . the incorporation of the miri bands has little effect on the resulting @xmath32 values in most cases and the fraction of catastrophic outliers is only slightly reduced ( see table [ tab : outliers_z7_ygg ] ) as in the case of bc03-sed galaxies , the impact of incorporating miri photometry is more evident at @xmath115 at f150w ( figure [ fig : z7_yggsn5 ] ) . the overall percentage of catastrophic outliers reduces from @xmath122 to @xmath123 by adding miri photometry in this case ( table [ tab : outliers_z7_ygg ] ) . if we consider only those galaxies with emission lines in their seds ( i.e. , young and with gas covering factor @xmath124 ) , also at @xmath115 , we see two interesting effects ( figure [ fig : z7_yggsn5el ] and table [ tab : outliers_z7_ygg ] ) . firstly , the degeneracies in redshift space are more important than for the general galaxy sample with @xmath115 . this is manifested in a much larger outlier percentage , namely @xmath125 when considering the nircam data alone . secondly , the effect of incorporating miri photometry becomes more noteworthy : including both miri bands reduces the percentage of outliers to @xmath126 . these effects are produced by two reasons : on the one hand , the nebular line emission boosts the miri fluxes and , thus , the @xmath28 of the miri data . on the other hand , the multiple emission lines in the _ yggdrasil _ templates with nebular emission result in similarly bright observed fluxes in contiguous filters , masking the continuum sed shape and making the sed fitting more difficult ( as explained in section [ sec : z7bc03 ] ) , so having a longer baseline is necessary for a proper redshift recovery . for the lowest quality photometry ( @xmath63 ; figure [ fig : z7_yggsn3 ] ) , the percentage of catastrophic outliers in the entire sample is @xmath127 using only nircam photometry . the advantage of incorporating miri data , which also have lower @xmath28 , is less obvious in this case , as the percentage of @xmath3 outliers still remains high even with the two miri bands ( @xmath128 ) . a significant fraction of galaxies are detected in only a few ( nircam and miri ) bands , so the photometry provides poor constraints for the sed fitting , making degeneracies in redshift space become evident . indeed , as it is the case for the bc03-sed galaxies , the catastrophic outliers correspond mainly to sources with detections in four or less _ jwst _ bands ( empty regions in the histograms of figure [ fig : z7_yggsn3 ] ) . however , in the case of the _ yggdrasil_-sed galaxies , the secondary peaks appearing in the output redshift distributions are quite more pronounced than for the bc03 galaxies . these secondary peaks are mainly produced by two kinds of templates that are not represented in our bc03-sed sample : 1 ) young galaxies with nebular emission . the combination of multiple emission lines and low @xmath28 produces an enhancement in the number of catastrophic outliers ; 2 ) young galaxies with @xmath59 ( i.e. , no emission lines ) and the highest extinction adopted to build our mock sample ( i.e. , @xmath129 ) . these galaxies have no analogues either in the bc03-based sample , as we explicitly incorporated the main emission lines in all galaxies with ages lower than the characteristic @xmath30 in the star formation history . as a summary , we conclude that the benefit of considering miri photometry along with the nircam data for _ yggdrasil_-sed galaxies is mainly obvious for nircam sources with moderate @xmath28 values , and particularly helpful in the case of seds with nebular emission . at low @xmath28 the advantage is less obvious . this is in contrast to our conclusion for the bc03-sed galaxies , indicating that at low @xmath28 the importance of having miri data depends significantly on the galaxy spectral type . in this section we show the miri magnitudes and nircam / miri colours of our simulated galaxies in sample 3 , as this can be a useful reference when planning _ jwst _ observations . in particular , we analyse how the miri detections vary with the galaxy sed type . given our chosen normalisation [ f150w]=29 mag , all these galaxies will easily be observed in nircam deep surveys ( as it takes only @xmath130 min integration per pointing to reach [ f150w]=29 mag , @xmath65 with nircam , according to the public _ jwst_/nircam exposure time calculator ) . so our aim here is to discuss the fractions of such galaxies that will be detected in typically deep miri observations . of course , these same results only need to be re - scaled to remain valid for other nircam magnitudes . figures [ fig : f560wcol_bc03 ] to [ fig : f770wcol_ygg ] show the expected miri magnitude distributions for our sample 3 galaxies generated with the bc03 and _ yggdrasil _ models . as the nircam f150w magnitude for all these galaxies has been fixed to [ f150w]=29 mag , there is a direct correspondence between the miri f560w magnitudes and the f150w - f560w colours , which are also shown in each plot . for the bc03 galaxies ( fig . [ fig : f560wcol_bc03 ] and [ fig : f770wcol_bc03 ] ) , we analysed separately the cases with and without emission lines , which here correspond to galaxies with ages lower and higher than their characteristic sfh decay parameter @xmath30 , respectively . for the _ yggdrasil _ galaxies ( fig . [ fig : f560wcol_ygg ] and [ fig : f770wcol_ygg ] ) , we analysed three cases : galaxies with ages larger that their constant star formation period , which are galaxies in passive evolution ; and galaxies which are still forming stars with two different gas covering factors : @xmath59 ( implying no line or nebular continuum emission ) and 1 ( with nebular emission ) . the median values of all distributions are provided in table [ tab : medmag56 ] and [ tab : medmag77 ] . the magnitude distributions in fig . [ fig : f560wcol_bc03 ] show that the vast majority of bc03 galaxies with [ f150w]=29 mag at @xmath131 and 10 , and more than a half of those at @xmath132 , will be detected by a miri survey with a detection limit [ f560w]@xmath133 mag . this result is valid for galaxies with or without emission lines . all the latter are cases in which a @xmath134 break is at least partly developed , so the seds are brighter at the miri wavelengths than at @xmath118 , particularly at @xmath21 ( see fig . [ fig : sed_z7 ] ) . this k - correction effect makes that the median [ f560w ] value at this redshift is brighter for galaxies without emission lines , as those with emission lines correspond to younger galaxies with fainter continua which partly cancel the emission line flux enhancement ( table [ tab : medmag56 ] ) . at @xmath135 and 10 , instead , the combination of the continuum k - correction and the nebular emission results in a net flux boosting in the case of emission - line galaxies . for f770w ( fig . [ fig : f770wcol_bc03 ] ) , the flux enhancement due to the emission line presence is only evident at @xmath132 and 10 , as the h@xmath60 emission line enters the f770w wavelength window at these redshifts ( table [ tab : medmag77 ] ) . most young galaxies at @xmath21 and 8 , instead , remain below our reference [ f770w]=28 mag detection limit , as their continua are blue and no emission line is present in this filter to help with the detection . so , the f770w filter will only allow us to detect evolved galaxies at @xmath68 or young line emitters at @xmath132 and 10 to a [ f770w]=28 mag cut . the vast majority of the _ yggdrasil_-sed galaxies with [ f150w]=29 mag that finished forming stars at @xmath68 will have mag@xmath11 in both miri bands ( fig . [ fig : f560wcol_ygg ] and [ fig : f770wcol_ygg ] , and tables [ tab : medmag56 ] and [ tab : medmag77 ] ) . this is the result of the same k - correction effect discussed before . for the _ yggdrasil _ star - forming galaxies , there is a clear enhancement of the miri fluxes produced by the nebular lines ( compare the cases with @xmath59 and 1 in fig . [ fig : f560wcol_ygg ] and [ fig : f770wcol_ygg ] and the corresponding tables ) . in this case , the flux enhacement is more obvious that for the bc03 templates because here we are comparing only young galaxies with and without lines ( segregated by their different gas covering factors ) , so all their continua are similarly blue . in both cases , however , the median miri magnitude values are @xmath136 mag . this implies that a miri galaxy survey to our reference depth will only detect a minority of star - forming galaxies with [ f150w]=29 mag at @xmath68 if their seds are similar to the _ yggdrasil _ templates . note that these galaxies are considerably brighter in f560w if they are at @xmath21 or 8 , while slightly brighter in f770w if at @xmath132 or 10 . note that , conversely , our colour analysis shows that detecting more than a half of red miri galaxies at @xmath68 will require nircam data at least three magnitudes deeper . this is the case both for ` passive galaxies ' ( galaxies which finished forming stars ) and for galaxies which are red simply because of the presence of prominent emission lines . so , as a summary , ` old ' galaxies at @xmath68 will easily be detected with miri in reasonably deep surveys , independently of their galaxy type . for young galaxies , the situation is more complex , as it depends on to which extent line emission can compensate for the very faint continua which is characteristic in these sources . f560w will provide more detections than f770w if maps of the same depth are obtained in both passbands . cccccc[ht ! ] 7 & 26.86 & 27.08 & 26.28 & 29.50 & 28.47 + 8 & 26.77 & 26.49 & 25.96 & 29.43 & 28.32 + 9 & 27.12 & 28.08 & 26.66 & 29.35 & 29.15 + 10 & 26.96 & 26.17 & 26.44 & 29.27 & 28.72 + cccccc[ht ! ] 7 & 26.70 & 28.64 & 26.10 & 29.64 & 29.05 + 8 & 26.59 & 28.68 & 25.80 & 29.62 & 29.13 + 9 & 26.98 & 27.52 & 26.44 & 29.58 & 28.87 + 10 & 26.79 & 26.51 & 26.24 & 29.47 & 28.53 + in this work we have tested the impact of having data in different _ jwst _ filter combinations on deriving photometric redshifts for galaxies at different redshifts . we considered the 8 nircam broad bands and the two shortest wavelength miri bands ( f560w and f770w ) , which are the most sensitive ones and , thus , those which will be preferred for the study of high-@xmath6 galaxies . in addition , we also investigated the effect of having ( or not ) ancillary photometry from _ hst _ and ground - based telescopes at wavelengths shorter than those to be observed with _ jwst _ ( i.e. , @xmath2 ) . we performed our tests on three galaxy samples with known input redshifts : a sample of 2422 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts @xmath19 ( sample 1 ) ; a sample of 1375 galaxies with candels consensus photometric redshifts at @xmath20 ( sample 2 ) ; and a sample of 2124 mock galaxies at @xmath7 ( sample 3 ) , whose seds have been simulated with two template libraries , namely bc03 with manual addition of the main emission lines for star - forming galaxies ( considered as those with age lower than the characteristic @xmath30 of the star formation history ) , and the _ yggdrasil _ library . besides , for sample 3 we also explicitly investigated the effect of having photometry with different @xmath28 values on the ability to recover the galaxy redshifts . in samples 1 and 2 , more than 90% of galaxies have f150w photometry with @xmath108 , so the test results based on these samples are not affected by the photometric quality . these three samples altogether have allowed us to assess different effects in the photometric redshift estimation , such as the presence of high-@xmath6 contaminants and the leakage of high-@xmath6 sources towards low @xmath6 . note that our three samples are not meant to emulate a real galaxy population selected from a _ jwst _ nircam or miri blank field , but rather sample the typical redshifts and sed types of the galaxies that will be observed in these surveys , in order to test potential problems in the @xmath3 derivation . our main results are : @xmath137 _ the nircam broad bands alone are not sufficient to obtain good - quality photometric redshift estimates at low and intermediate redshifts ( @xmath138)_. for sample 1 , which is optimised to study the redshift range @xmath139 , the use of nircam data alone results in a high photometric redshift dispersion and outlier percentage ( @xmath140 ) . in sample 2 , which is particular suited to study the leakage of @xmath20 sources to low @xmath6 due to redshift failure , we found that @xmath141 ( @xmath95 ) of the input sources with @xmath92 ( @xmath94 ) are misidentified as lower @xmath6 galaxies . these effects are smaller at @xmath142 , as the lyman break is shifted into the nircam bands . @xmath137 _ having photometry in the hst f435w and f606w bands , and if possible also in the ground - based @xmath67 band , is very important to have the fraction of low-@xmath6 contaminants under control_. this photometry is important to constrain the lyman break shift and , thus , the redshifts of low-@xmath6 sources . indeed , in sample 1 the percentage of low-@xmath6 outliers changes from @xmath140 to @xmath143 , and the normalised redshift difference distribution r.m.s . reduces in 40% . in sample 2 , the percentage of sources leaking from @xmath92 ( @xmath94 ) to lower @xmath6 reduces from @xmath141 ( @xmath95 ) to @xmath97 ( @xmath29 ) . at @xmath94 , the reduction in the percentage of leaking sources is exclusively due to the incorporation of the _ hst _ bands . the additional incorporation of @xmath67-band data has no effect because the lyman break shifts inside the _ hst _ wavelength range at these redshifts . @xmath137 _ miri f560w and f770w data can help mitigate the absence of photometry at @xmath2_. in sample 1 , we found that the percentage of contaminants reduces from 41% ( 22% ) to @xmath144 ( @xmath145 ) at @xmath92 ( @xmath94 ) , by complementing the nircam data only with miri data in the photometric input catalogue . for the leaking sources in sample 2 , the addition of miri photometry to the nircam data reduces the percentage of outliers from @xmath141 ( @xmath95 ) to @xmath99 ( @xmath100 ) at the same redshifts . when both the _ hst _ and miri photometry are considered along with the nircam photometry , the percentage of leaking sources from @xmath92 goes down to @xmath146 . @xmath137 among the different photometric configurations tested here , the miri f560w and f770w bands are the only ones that can meaningfully complement the nircam data in galaxy studies at @xmath147 . the importance of the _ hst _ data at @xmath2 becomes negligible once the lyman break shifts within the nircam bands , except to confirm the expected non - detections . @xmath137 for photometry with f150w @xmath112 , the nircam data alone allows for accurate redshift estimates for galaxies at @xmath148 in most cases . we found that the r.m.s . of the @xmath149 distributions for sample 3 range between @xmath114 and 0.02 with nircam data alone at all high @xmath6 . the addition of miri photometry has a mild effect , being useful to enhance the accuracy of the derived @xmath3 . @xmath137 for sources with f150w @xmath115 , the benefit of incorporating miri photometry becomes more evident . in our reference case , in which the miri depth is one magnitude brighter than the nircam f150w depth , the incorporation of miri data significantly reduces the fraction of outliers with respect to the case with nircam data alone . this improvement is particularly noteworthy in the case of _ yggdrasil_-sed galaxies with emission lines , as the multiple nebular lines coupled with a moderate - quality @xmath28 make the sed fitting more challenging . the miri bands help extend the wavelength baseline for the sed fitting , and thus using nircam and miri data altogether results in a clear redshift recovery improvement . @xmath137 at f150w @xmath63 , the role of miri data in improving the redshift determination depends very much on the sed type . as ` old ' galaxies are red , miri fluxes are brighter that nircam fluxes , so the incorporation of the miri data is of clear benefit for these sources . for star - forming galaxies , the presence of emission lines in the miri bands boosts the miri fluxes , but at the same time these galaxies have bluer continua , so the net effect is more variable in these cases . @xmath137 at fixed @xmath28 , _ the presence of multiple emission lines , like in the case of nebular emission , makes the correct redshift identification much more difficult . _ although the emission lines enhance the fluxes , the presence of emission lines in all passbands make the filter - convolved seds rather featureless and the sed fitting becomes more complicated . in addition , we analysed the miri magnitudes of our sample 3 simulated galaxies at @xmath68 . as we have normalised all the seds to [ f150w]=29 mag , the f150w - miri colours directly correspond to miri magnitude values . analysing this expected miri photometry has allowed us to assess what types of high-@xmath6 galaxies will likely be detected in miri deep surveys . for a different f150w normalisation , one simply has to scale these results , as the galaxy colours are fixed for each sed model . we found that a miri survey with a detection limit of [ f560w]=@xmath150 mag should enable the detection of the vast majority of the nircam sources with [ f150w]=29 mag at @xmath7 , provided that these sources are at least mildly evolved . the youngest galaxies which are still forming stars ( _ yggdrasil_-sed galaxies with ages @xmath151 ) will remain mostly undetected . although in the case of gas covering factor @xmath124 the nebular lines make the miri fluxes much brighter than in the case of @xmath59 , the continua of these young galaxies are very blue , so the resulting miri fluxes are not very high even in the case of nebular emission . at the same miri reference depth , the f770w filter will provide less detections than the f560w filter at @xmath68 . among the nircam sources with [ f150w]=29 mag , evolved galaxies at @xmath68 and some line emitters at @xmath132 and 10 will be detected in f770w , but very few line emitters at @xmath21 and 8 . conversely , our colour analysis shows that detecting the majority of red miri galaxies at @xmath68 will require nircam data at least three magnitudes deeper . this is the case both for ` passive galaxies ' ( galaxies which finished forming stars ) and for galaxies which are red simply because of the presence of main emission lines . as an overall summary , we argue that the results presented here constitute a useful reference for designing deep imaging surveys with _ jwst_. we conclude that nircam and miri will have complementary roles and the optimal observing strategy and filter combination to be adopted will depend on each observing program s science goals . as adding miri imaging to the nircam observations would significantly enlarge the requested observing times , observers must clearly assess the need and importance of the former for their specific studies . miri observations with both the f560w and f770w filters are necessary along with the nircam data if a correct identification of low and moderate redshift ( @xmath138 ) sources are desired in fields without @xmath152 coverage . alternatively , a less expensive strategy would be limiting galaxy surveys to fields with ancillary @xmath152 data of matching depth and obtaining only nircam data , but the lack of any miri imaging would still result in a slightly higher percentage of redshift outliers and a lower overall recovered - redshift precision . if the main science goal is simply identifying the bulk of the galaxy population at @xmath7 , proposing an observing program based on ultra - deep nircam data alone will be adequate . however , adding miri imaging will help improve the identification of red sources and is of utmost importance to recover stellar ages and stellar masses at @xmath54 ( bisigello et al . , in prep . ) therefore , observing with both cameras will be necessary for a comprehensive study of galaxy evolution since early cosmic times . this work is partly based on observations taken with the nasa / esa _ hubble space telescope _ , which is operated by the association of universities for research in astronomy , inc . , under nasa contract nas5 - 26555 ; with the _ spitzer space telescope _ , which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology under a contract with nasa ; and the very large telescope operated by the european southern observatory ( eso ) at cerro paranal . lb and kic acknowledge the support of the nederlandse onderzoekschool voor de astronomie ( nova ) . kic also acknowledges funding from the european research council through the award of the consolidator grant i d 681627-buildup . olf acknowledges funding from the european research council advanced grant i d 268107-early . pgp - g acknowledges support from the spanish government mineco grants aya2012 - 31277 and aya2015 - 70815-erc . lg acknowledges support from the spanish government mineco grants aaya2012 - 32295 . jp acknowledges the uk science and technology facilities council and the uk space agency for their support of the uk s _ jwst _ miri development activities . we thank macarena garca - marn , alistair glasse and lvaro labiano for providing us the most updated versions of the _ jwst _ miri filter transmission curves . we also thank an anonymous referee for a careful and constructive report . anders , p. , & fritze - v . alvensleben , u. 2003 , , 401 , 1063 arnouts , s. , cristiani , s. , moscardini , l. , et al . 1999 , , 310 , 540 ashby , m. l. n. , willner , s. p. , fazio , g. g. , et al . 2015 , , 218 , 33 balestra , i. , mainieri , v. , popesso , p. , et al . 2010 , , 512 , a12 baum , w. a. 1957 , , 62 , 6 bouchet , p. , garca - marn , m. , lagage , p .- o . , et al . 2015 , , 127 , 612 bruzual , g. , & charlot , s. 2003 , , 344 , 1000 bunker , a. j. , stanway , e. r. , ellis , r. s. , mcmahon , r. g. , & mccarthy , p. j. 2003 , , 342 , l47 calzetti , d. , armus , l. , bohlin , r. c. , et al . 2000 , , 533 , 682 caputi , k. i. , dunlop , j. s. , mclure , r. j. , et al . 2012 , 750 , l20 caputi , k. i. , ilbert , o. , laigle , c. , et al . 2015 , , 810 , 73 cardamone , c. n. , van dokkum , p. g. , urry , c. m. , et al . 2010 , , 189 , 270 cristiani , s. , appenzeller , i. , arnouts , s. , et al . 2000 , , 359 , 489 croom , s. m. , warren , s. j. , & glazebrook , k. 2001 , , 328 , 150 dahlen , t. , mobasher , b. , faber , s. m. , et al . 2013 , , 775 , 93 dickinson , m. , stern , d. , giavalisco , m. , et al . 2004 , , 600 , l99 doherty , m. , bunker , a. j. , ellis , r. s. , & mccarthy , p. j. 2005 , , 361 , 525 faisst , a. l. , capak , p. , hsieh , b c. , et al . , 2016 , , 821 , 122 fumagalli , m. , patel , s. g. , franx , m. , et al . 2012 , , 757 , l22 gardner , j. p. , mather , j. c. , clampin , m. , et al . 2009 , , 10 , 1 glasse , a. , rieke , g. h. , bauwens , e. , et al . 2015 , , 127 , 686 grogin , n. a. , kocevski , d. d. , faber , s. m. , et al . 2011 , , 197 , 35 guo , y. , ferguson , h. c. , giavalisco , m. , et al . 2013 , , 207 , 24 ilbert , o. , arnouts , s. , mccracken , h. j. , et al . 2006 , , 457 , 841 ilbert , o. , capak , p. , salvato , m. , et al . 2009 , , 690 , 1236 koekemoer , a. m. , faber , s. m. , ferguson , h. c. , et al . 2011 , , 197 , 36 konno , a. , ouchi , m. , ono , y. , et al . 2014 , , 797 , 16 kroupa , p. 2001 , , 322 , 231 kurk , j. , cimatti , a. , daddi , e. , et al . 2013 , , 549 , a63 le fvre , o. , vettolani , g. , garilli , b. , et al . 2005 , , 439 , 845 le fvre , o. , tasca , l. a. m. , cassata , p. , et al . , 2015 , , 576a , 79 madau , p. 1995 , , 441 , 18 meyer , m. r. , rieke , m. , eisenstein , d. , et al . 2004 , bulletin of the american astronomical society , 37 , 180.09 mignoli , m. , cimatti , a. , zamorani , g. , et al . 2005 , , 437 , 883 morris , a. m. , kocevski , d. d. , trump , j. r. , et al . 2015 , , 149 , 178 oke , j. b. , gunn , j. e. , 1983 , , 266 , 713 pentericci , l. , vanzella , e. , fontana , a. , et al . 2014 , , 793 , 113 popesso , p. , dickinson , m. , nonino , m. , et al . 2009 , , 494 , 443 ravikumar , c. d. , puech , m. , flores , h. , et al . 2007 , , 465 , 1099 rafelski , m. , teplitz , h. i. , gardner , j. p. , et al . 2015 , , 150 , 31 rieke , m. j. , kelly , d. & horner , s. 2005 , spie , 5904 , 1 rieke , g. h. , wright , g. s. , bker , t. , et al . 2015 , , 127 , 584 schaerer , d. 2002 , , 382 , 28 silverman , j. d. , mainieri , v. , salvato , m. , et al . 2010 , , 191 , 124 smit , r. , bouwens , r. j. , labb , i. , et al . 2015 , arxiv:1511.08808 stanway , e. r. , glazebrook , k. , bunker , a. j. , et al . 2004 , , 604 , l13 stanway , e. r. , bunker , a. j. , mcmahon , r. g. , et al . 2004 , , 607 , 704 stark , d. p. , schenker , m. a. , ellis , r. , et al . 2013 , , 763 , 129 strolger , l .- g . , riess , a. g. , dahlen , t. , et al . 2004 , , 613 , 200 szokoly , g. p. , bergeron , j. , hasinger , g. , et al . 2004 , , 155 , 271 vanzella , e. , fontana , a. , pentericci , l. , et al . 2014 , , 569 , a78 van der wel , a. , franx , m. , van dokkum , p. g. , & rix , h .- w . 2004 , , 601 , l5 wright , g. s. , wright , d. , goodson , g. b. , et al . 2015 , , 127 , 595 zackrisson , e. , rydberg , c .- e . , schaerer , d. , stlin , g. , & tuli , m. 2011 , , 740 , 13 in section [ sec_sample3descr ] we considered four redshifts for our sample 3 analysis : @xmath21 , 8 , 9 and 10 . these four redshifts are representative of most of the entire redshift range @xmath7 , except for a few exception that we study here . for this analysis , we considered only bc03 templates to which we manually added the main emission lines . we analysed how these emission lines move in and out nircam and miri filters to identify all possible configurations ( fig . [ fig : el_band ] ) . for each filter , we only took into account the wavelength range where its transmission is above 20@xmath84 . to cover the redshift ranges that are unrepresented by our original analysis ( corresponding to the shaded areas in fig . [ fig : el_band ] ) , we re - tested the sample 3 redshift recovery at four additional redshifts , namely , @xmath153 and @xmath154 . the results of our new tests are shown in fig . [ fig : newz ] ( for @xmath115 ) . at @xmath155 , the main difference respect to the @xmath21 configuration is that the [ oiii ] line moves out of the f356w nircam filter while h@xmath156 is still inside . the results when using nircam broad bands alone are very similar to the @xmath21 case , with similar r.m.s . values , 0.023 in this case ( compared with 0.025 at @xmath21 ) and similar distribution shape . the number of outliers decreases from @xmath157 to 0 when adding the f560w band , but it does not change when adding the f770w band . also the r.m.s . improves more when adding the f560w filter rather than with the f770w one . at @xmath158 the main difference respect to the @xmath21 configuration and the previous one is that there are no emission lines inside the f356w band . when using nircam bands alone , it is already possible to obtain a good redshift estimation with totally no outliers and a small r.m.s .. this is because the absence of emission line inside the f356w band creates a strong contrast with the closest bands , allowing the code to properly identify the main sed features . moreover , this contrast happens in a narrow redshift range , confining the range of possible redshift solutions and producing a very small r.m.s . this is the most favourable configuration for the nircam bands among all considered redshifts . by adding the miri bands there is only a slight improvement to the already good redshift estimation . the case of @xmath159 is representative of the redshift range where no emission lines at all are present in the miri bands , while [ oiii ] , h@xmath156 and [ oii ] are inside the nircam wavelength range . the main difference between this case and the @xmath135 one is that the flux observed in the f115w band , where the lyman break falls , is fainter and more often is below the 2@xmath32 detection limit . when using the nircam bands only the derived distribution is broad , but there are almost no outliers ( 0.5@xmath84 ) . when adding the miri bands , and in particular the f560w band , the r.m.s . becomes about a half . finally , the @xmath160 case corresponds to a redshift in which [ oiii ] is just outside the f444w band , but h@xmath156 is still inside , while the opposite situation happens in the f560w miri band . the redshift estimation with nircam bands alone is generally good , with an r.m.s . of 0.019 and only one outlier . when adding the miri bands , there is a slight improvement in the redshift estimation ( r.m.s.@xmath32=0.012 ) and no outliers . the cases presented here are slightly different from the cases presented in the main body of the paper , but do not lead to any significantly different conclusion . considering all eight analysed redshifts and @xmath115 , the redshift estimation by using only nircam broad bands alone is particularly good at @xmath161 and @xmath162 , but is the worst at @xmath159 and @xmath163 . adding miri bands , the redshift estimation improves at all considered redshifts , and , in the majority of cases , f560w decreases the r.m.s . a bit more than f770w . in sample 3 we derived fluxes for all nircam broad bands assuming the same integration time for all of them . however , the sensitivity of nircam peaks around 2 @xmath14 m , so different integration times could be considered in order to compensate for different sensitivities . therefore , we tested this alternative scenario by considering observations of the same depth for all nircam bands , i.e. , the f150w band depth , and we re - derived photometric redshifts for all galaxies in sample 3 . in particular , this method implies deeper observations for the less sensitive bands , i.e. f070w , f090w , f115w and f444w , respect to the method considered before , but shallower observations for the most sensitive bands , i.e. f200w and f277w . we did this test for both bc03 and yggdrasil templates and for all three @xmath28 values considered before ( 3,5 and 10 ) . we compared the mean and r.m.s . of the normalised redshift difference @xmath164 for the current case and that where we assumed the same integration time in all nircam filters . our results are shown in table [ tab : samestn ] , while the r.m.s . values are also shown in figure [ fig : rms_comparison ] . at @xmath112 , the derived results considering the same depth are slightly better or similar than the one derived with the same integration times . on the other hand , at @xmath63 , results are similar or slightly worse . at @xmath115 the results are mixed , depending on the type of template and redshift considered . these results reveal a different importance of deep observations with the most sensitive and less sensitive nircam bands . in particular , deep observations with the less sensitive bands seem to improve results generally when the @xmath28 is high , while deep observations with the most sensitive bands are more crucial at low @xmath28 values . it is worth noticing that , despite the fact that reaching the same depth in all nircam filters improves the results derived using nircam bands alone , these results are still worse that those derived using nircam and miri bands together . c|ccc|ccc[ht ! ] z=7 ( bc03 ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] + z=8 ( bc03 ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] + z=9 ( bc03 ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] + z=10 ( bc03 ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] + z=7 ( ygg ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] + z=8 ( ygg ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] + z=9 ( ygg ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] + z=10 ( ygg ) & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] & [email protected] + Abstract:
[ "the determination of galaxy redshifts in _ james webb space telescope ( jwst ) s _ blank - field surveys will mostly rely on photometric estimates , based on the data provided by _ jwst s _ near - infrared camera ( nircam ) at @xmath0 and mid infrared instrument ( miri ) at @xmath1 . in this work we analyse the impact of choosing different combinations of nircam and miri broad - band filters ( f070w to f770w ) , as well as having ancillary data at @xmath2 , on the derived photometric redshifts ( @xmath3 ) of a total of 5921 real and simulated galaxies , with known input redshifts @xmath4 . we found that observations at @xmath5 are necessary to control the contamination of high-@xmath6 samples by low-@xmath6 interlopers . adding miri ( f560w and f770w ) photometry to the nircam data mitigates the absence of ancillary observations at @xmath5 and improves the redshift estimation . at @xmath7 , accurate @xmath3 can be obtained with the nircam broad bands alone when @xmath8 , but the @xmath3 quality significantly degrades at @xmath9 . adding miri photometry with one magnitude brighter depth than the nircam depth allows for a redshift recovery of @xmath10 , depending on sed type , and its effect is particularly noteworthy for galaxies with nebular emission . the vast majority of nircam galaxies with [ f150w]=29 ab mag at @xmath7 will be detected with miri at [ f560w , f770w]@xmath11 mag if these sources are at least mildly evolved or have spectra with emission lines boosting the mid - infrared fluxes ." ]
14,698
14,698
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the initial stellar mass function ( imf ) has been observed directly in dozens of clusters in our galaxy and the large magellanic clouds , and inferred indirectly for our galaxy and other galaxies from metallicities , supernova rates , ionization levels , luminosities , dynamical masses , colors , and other tracers . there is some convergence in these observations to an imf that is approximately a power law above 1 m@xmath0 , having a slope between @xmath1 and @xmath2 on a @xmath3 histogram ( see reviews in massey 1998 and scalo 1998 ) , with a flattening below this down to @xmath4 m@xmath0 or lower . the power - law part is in rough agreement with the salpeter ( 1955 ) function , which has a slope of @xmath5 on such a plot , and also with the scalo ( 1986 ) determination , which revised the often - used miller & scalo ( 1979 ) function at intermediate and high mass ( the miller - scalo function is too steep ) . scalo ( 1998 ) recently emphasized the variations in the derived power law slopes from region to region , which amount to about @xmath6 . there are no obvious correlations between these variations and physical properties of the star - forming regions , including the cluster density , galactocentric radius , and metallicity ( scalo 1998 ) . there are also `` gaps '' in the power law parts of some cluster imfs , according to scalo ( e.g. , ngc 103 ; phelps & janes 1993 ) , and a `` ledge '' in the orion imf by hillenbrand ( 1997 ) . these features led scalo to suggest that physical effects might be involved , making imf variations larger than poisson statistics . an emphasis on the similarities , rather than the differences , in the imf has been made by massey and collaborators ( see review in massey 1998 ) . they find an imf power law slope that is fairly constant , around the salpeter value , for clusters with a factor of @xmath7 range in densities ( massey & hunter 1998 ; luhman & rieke 1998 ) and a factor of @xmath8 range in metallicities ( massey , johnson & degioia - eastwood 1995a ; see also the globular cluster study by bellazzini et al . 1995 ) . this slope was also found by kennicutt , tamblyn & congdon ( 1994 ) in galaxy - wide surveys , and by bresolin & kennicutt ( 1997 ) for individual hii regions in galaxies , using the equivalent widths of hydrogen emission lines , and it was found by greggio et al . ( 1993 ) , marconi et al . ( 1995 ) , holtzman , et al . ( 1997 ) , and grillmair , et al . ( 1998 ) from color magnitude diagrams of stars in the lmc and local dwarf galaxies . chemical evolution also tends to suggest an invariant imf , at least at intermediate and high mass , in the stellar halo ( nissen et al . 1994 ) and disk ( tsujimoto et al . 1997 ; wyse 1998 ) , in qso damped ly@xmath9 ( lu et al . 1996 ) and ly@xmath9 forest ( wyse 1998 ) lines , the intracluster medium ( renzini et al . 1993 ; wyse 1997 , 1998 ; however , see loewenstein & mushotzky 1996 ) , and elliptical galaxies ( see review in wyse 1998 ) . the observable in this case is the ratio of the iron to the oxygen abundance , which is always about the same . since this ratio scales with the ratio of intermediate mass to high mass stars , the imf must be about the same too . a different result was obtained by heikkil , johansson & olofsson ( 1998 ) , who conjectured that a low c@xmath10o / c@xmath11o ratio in the lmc results from a relatively low proportion of high - mass stars , as observed , for example , by massey et al . ( 1995b ) ; clearly the chemical and fractionation processes involved with this important isotope ratio have to be investigated further . gibson & matteucci ( 1997 ) also obtained a different result from evolution and metallicity models of elliptical galaxies , including infall and wind ejection of gas . they suggested the imf had a higher proportion of massive stars than the solar neighborhood , as it appears to in some starburst models ( discussed below ) . angeletti & giannone ( 1997 ) modeled elliptical galaxies and fit the mass - to - light and [ fe / h ] ratios with an imf that has a mass - dependent high mass slope , different from the salpeter value . the imf in local ob associations might differ from the salpeter value too . brown ( 1998 ) reviewed observations , including those with distances from the hipparcos satellite , which suggest a slightly steeper slope , @xmath12 to @xmath13 for local associations , but the stellar types in these studies were obtained from photometry , and massey ( 1998 ) discussed how such data can artificially steepen the imf without spectroscopic observations too . at the low mass end , there is no _ systematic _ indication yet of a turnover at masses lower than 0.1 m@xmath0 , but there are some regions where such a turnover has been reported , e.g. , in nearby field stars ( reid & gazis 1997a ) , orion ( hillenbrand 1997 ) , the pleiades ( reid 1998 ) , ngc 6231 ( sung , bessell , & lee 1998 ) , 30 dor ( nota 1998 ) , and the globular cluster ngc 6397 ( king et al . there are also regions where the imf appears to rise below 0.1 m@xmath0 , again for local stars ( mra et al . 1996 ; gould et al . 1997 ) . scalo ( 1998 ) suggests that the local field results at low mass contain uncertainties in the star formation rate , pre - main - sequence contribution , and mass - luminosity relation . the older cluster results are uncertain also because of evaporation of low mass members , although reid ( 1998 ) suggests evaporation is not important for the pleiades . in any case , scalo ( 1998 ) and reid ( 1998 ) both provide evidence that the low mass imf , below 1 m@xmath0 , varies slightly in shape from region to region , although no sensible correlations with properties of the environment have yet been noticed . variations in the low mass imf are also seen for globular clusters , without any obvious dependence on metallicity ( santiago et al . 1996 ; piotto et al . 1997 ; see review in cool 1998 ) , but there may be some dependence on the cluster evaporation rate and susceptibility to orbit shocking ( cool 1998 ) , since low mass stars leave the cluster most easily . the imf for the young open cluster mentioned above , ngc 6231 ( sung et al . 1998 ) , is somewhat peculiar , because the turnover mass is around 2.5 m@xmath0 , much higher than in ob associations and other clusters . however , ngc 6231 is a dense cluster @xmath8 my old , and a high turnover mass in the central regions might be expected from rapid thermalization leading to mass segregation ( e.g. , scalo 1986 ) . the low mass imf is also probed by observations of embedded clusters , where most of the stars are pre - main sequence ( zinnecker et al . 1993 ; fletcher & stahler 1994a , b ; lada & lada 1995 ; lada , alves & lada 1996 ; megeath 1996 ; horner , lada , & lada 1997 ) . pre - main - sequence ( pms ) clusters have not yet evolved kinematically , so differential evaporation and segregation of high and low mass members should not be as much of a problem as it is for older clusters . pms stars are also much brighter than they will be on the main sequence , so even stars less massive than the hydrogen burning limit can be observed in local clusters ( see review in lada , lada , & muench 1998 ) . lada et al . ( 1998 ) combined herbig s ( 1998 ) optical data on the cluster ic 348 , which was used to determine the history of star formation in the region , with their own k - band luminosity function to determine the low mass imf . they found that the imf in this cluster turns over below 0.25 m@xmath0 . recent searches for brown dwarfs ( zuckerman & becklin 1992 ; reid & gizis 1997b ; reid 1998 ) suggest these objects are so infrequent that the imf can not continue to rise at low mass . the number of possible brown dwarfs is consistent with an extension of the flattening seen between 1 m@xmath0 and 0.1 m@xmath0 ( reid 1998 ) . in spite of these approximate similarities in the imf from region to region , there have been two clear and consistent deviations that , if real , would have important consequences for star formation . one is the apparent shift toward relatively higher masses in regions of extreme activity , such as starburst galaxies ( e.g. rieke et al . 1980 ) , and the other is the apparent shift toward relatively lower masses in regions of extreme _ in_activity , the so - called `` field '' population , away from ob associations , as discussed by massey et al . ( 1995b ) . indeed , there may be a monotonic transition from low - mass weighted imfs to high - mass weighted imfs with increasing star formation rate , ism pressure , radiation field , etc . , perhaps because of a change in cloud properties , cloud destruction capabilities of young stars , and other things . the `` normal '' imf occupies what seems to be a broad range of star formation rates between these two limits , but this broad range is not so broad in terms of _ possible _ ism conditions . it may only be broad in the sense that it is common in main galaxy disks where some type of feedback between star formation and gas stability is maintained for long periods of time . reviews of imfs in starburst galaxies are in scalo ( 1990 ) , zinnecker ( 1996 ) , and leitherer ( 1998 ) . the first observation that suggested a `` top - heavy '' imf was that the luminosity of the starburst regions are so high , and the dynamical masses from the rotation curves so low , that there can not be a full complement of low mass stars , which dominate the mass , to go with the high mass stars , which dominate the light ( rieke et al . 1980 , 1993 ; kronberg , biermann , & schwab 1985 ; wright et al . 1988 ; see reviews in telesco 1988 , joseph 1991 , rieke 1991 , thuan 1991 ) . thus the imf contains a higher proportion of high mass stars than the solar neighborhood . doane & matthews ( 1993 ) reached the same conclusion for m82 based on many properties of galactic evolution models , including the remaining gas mass , total mass , star formation rate , and supernova rate . doyon , joseph , & wright ( 1994 ) and smith et al . ( 1995 ) found top - heavy imfs from spectroscopic line ratios for the starburst galaxies ngc 3256 and ugc 8387 , respectively . smith , herter & haynes ( 1998 ) found the same result from infrared excesses in 20 starburst galaxies . the distribution of stars was often not resolved in the early starburst studies . satyapal et al . ( 1995 , 1997 ) derived a smaller extinction - corrected k band luminosity for the inner 30 of the starburst galaxy m82 , and suggested the imf could have the salpeter slope all the way from 0.1 to 100 m@xmath0 with only 30% of the dynamical mass in the star formation event . ho & filippenko ( 1996a , b ) measured the velocity dispersions in two dense clusters in starburst galaxies , clusters that may evolve into globulars like those in the halo of our galaxy ( meurer 1995 ) . they found that the young globulars have large masses like old globulars , and that the young clusters would evolve into old clusters with a mass - to - light ratio like the old globulars after a hubble time . because of this , they suggested that the imf might be the same in the young starburst globulars as it is in old globular clusters , and in particular , that it contains low mass stars ( e.g. , de marchi & paresce 1997 ) . other considerations have led to revisions of the top - heavy models as well . devereux ( 1989 ) observed 20 nearby starbursts like m82 with infrared photometry , and found no evidence for an unusual imf in any of these ; he pointed out that a revision of extinction corrections for m82 could change the rieke et al . ( 1980 ) result too , as recently confirmed by satyapal et al . schaerer ( 1996 ) considered detailed evolutionary models of young stellar populations in starburst galaxies and also found that the imf was normal . calzetti ( 1997 ) modeled multiwavelength spectroscopy and broad - band infrared photometry of 19 starburst galaxies and found that the salpeter imf between 0.1 and 100 m@xmath0 fits the observations . stasiska & leitherer ( 1996 ) modeled the emission line spectra of giant hii region and starburst galaxies , having a factor - of - ten range in metallicities , and found a salpeter imf up to 100 m@xmath0 ; the lower mass limit could not be obtained , however . the proposed peculiarity of starburst imfs is therefore not certain , a conclusion reached by scalo ( 1990 ) as well . maybe only the extreme examples of starbursts require a high proportion of massive stars , while other starbursts , perhaps more `` ordinary , '' do not . the exact form of the peculiarity in a starburst imf is not known either . it could be `` truncated '' in the sense that the lower mass limit of the power law , where the power law slope begins to flatten , is higher than usual , perhaps as high as several m@xmath0 instead of several tenths of a m@xmath0 . such truncation may be observed already for 30 dor ( nota 1998 ) . or , it could have a power - law slope that is shallower than @xmath14 , or possibly , a higher upper mass limit . these differences are often hard to distinguish , even though all of them affect the mass - to - light ratio . fortunately , the exact form of the imf sometimes affects other things as well . for example , charlot et al . ( 1993 ) suggested that a truncated imf will produce a very red population of red giants , without the corresponding main sequence stars , after the turnoff age reaches the stellar lifetime at the truncation mass . wang & silk ( 1993 ) suggested that the truncated model gives an oxygen abundance that is too high when the star formation process is over . presumably these other constraints will help narrow down the possible choices . the extreme field studied by massey et al . ( 1995b ) is another example where the salpeter imf seems to break down . in regions of the lmc and our galaxy that are more than 30 parsecs from catalogued ob associations , massey et al . found o - type stars that probably did not drift there during their short lifetimes . massey et al . showed with an h - r diagram that there was an approximately steady rate of star formation there for the last 10 my years , and they derived a time - averaged imf . the result was very steep , with @xmath15 instead of @xmath16 for a salpeter function . there are several other peculiarities of the imf that may or may not have a specific physical origin . for example , it has been known for a long time ( larson 1982 ; myers & fuller 1993 ) that high mass clouds produce high mass stars , and low mass clouds produce low mass stars . two decades ago , this observation and others were related to the concept of a bimodel imf ( eggen 1976 , 1977 ; elmegreen 1978 ; gsten & mezger 1983 ; larson 1977 , 1986 ) , and to the impression that spiral arms preferentially formed massive stars ( mezger & smith 1977 ) , presumably because the molecular clouds in spiral arms are more massive , or somehow different from interarm clouds . today , we know that massive clouds also produce low mass stars in great abundance ( herbig & terndrup 1986 ) , and there are essentially no local regions that produce high mass stars exclusively . thus the `` observation '' that the maximum mass of a star correlates with the mass of the cloud could be only a statistical sampling effect ( larson 1982 ; elmegreen 1983 ; walter & boyd 1991 ; massey & hunter 1998 ) : high mass clouds produce more stars of all types , and so they are more likely to sample at the tail of the imf to produce a few massive stars . in the same sense , high mass clouds should also produce more dwarf stars than low mass clouds . an imf model based on random sampling from a hierarchical cloud ( elmegreen 1997a ) shows this effect clearly in figure [ fig : mvsm ] . each curve on the left is from a different cluster , with a number of stars in the clusters equal to 2500 , 5000 , 10000 , 25000 , 50000 , and 100000 . as the number of model stars increases , the mass of the largest star increases too , as shown on the right of the figure . the expected slope of the power law relation between cluster mass , @xmath17 , and maximum star mass , @xmath18 , is @xmath19 , i.e. , @xmath20 ; actually the calculation gives a slightly steeper slope because of storage limitations to the number of hierarchical levels allowed in the simulation ( these models use 8 levels with an average of 3 subclumps per clump at each level ) . this property of increasing maximum star mass with cloud mass should not depend on any specific imf model or on the star formation process . to be more precise about the stochastic interpretation of this effect , we can consider an imf @xmath21 , which gives the salpeter function when @xmath22 . the largest star , with mass @xmath18 , typically satisfies @xmath23 . this gives @xmath24 . because the total cluster mass is @xmath25 , the largest star is related to the total cluster mass as @xmath26.\ ] ] for @xmath27 and @xmath22 , this gives @xmath28 , and for @xmath29 @xmath30 , this gives @xmath31 . thus , a cluster requires several hundred m@xmath0 before a small o - type star is likely to appear , and a cluster with @xmath32 m@xmath0 is likely to contain @xmath8 modest o - type stars or a few very massive ones . this is the mass range for the largest open clusters in the milky way disk , indicating that when a few o stars appear , a cluster is likely to terminate its formation in an unbound state , presumably as a result of rapid cloud destruction , and make an expanding ob association ( elmegreen 1983 ) . larson ( 1991 , 1992 ) and khersonsky ( 1997 ) interpret this observation in the opposite way , saying that there is a physical effect which tends to produce higher mass stars in clouds of higher mass , and that the imf partly results from this physical effect . larson ( 1992 ) attributes the physical effect to a larger accretion length in larger clouds for material going into a star . if there is such an effect , and the observation is not entirely statistical as discussed above , then the superposition of imfs from clouds of different mass would be different from the imf in any one cloud . that is , clouds of low mass would produce an imf with a particular slope up to some maximum mass , and clouds of higher mass would produce an imf , perhaps with the same slope , up to higher masses . the sum of these two imfs would be an imf with greater slope than either separate cloud , because the summed imf contains low mass stars from both clouds , but only high mass stars from the more massive cloud . larson ( 1991 ) proposed his model by saying , in effect , that only one star forms in each cloud fragment at each level in the hierarchy , and that the star mass is always proportional to the square root of the fragment mass . then the sum over all fragments is the final imf , and this has a slope of @xmath33 , which is not too bad . stated this way , there is no problem with the model because each component in the sum is only a single star , not a whole cluster of stars with a separate imf . however , even in this model , if we add together the stellar populations from many separate clouds with different total masses , then the summed imf will be steeper than the imf in each . at this point , it is important to recall that the imf obtained from large - scale surveys of galaxies and their metallicities is about the same as the imf observed in individual clusters . thus the summed imf from many regions of star formation has to be about the same as the imf from each separate cluster . this would seem to suggest that the observed increase in maximum star mass with cloud mass is not the result of a physical process that specifically increases the upper stellar mass in larger clouds . a second peculiarity about star formation is that the high mass stars tend to form after the low mass stars ( herbig 1962a , b ; iben & talbot 1966 ) . this has been determined most recently for 30 dor ( massey & hunter 1998 ) . again one can think of physical reasons for this , such as a gradual warming of the cloud following the formation of low mass stars , and an increase in the jeans mass with temperature ( silk 1977 ; yoshii & saio 1985 ) , but statistical effects can explain it too . the decreasing nature of the imf at high mass implies that massive stars are likely to form only after a lot of low mass stars have already formed . for a constant star formation rate , the average time between the formation of stars in a logarithmic mass range centered on @xmath34 is proportional to the rate at which these stars form , which is inversely proportional to the relative number of the stars , or @xmath35\right)^{-1}\propto m^{x}$ ] . for a constant star formation rate , this is also the average time after star formation begins for the _ first _ appearance of a star with this mass . thus the most common , low - mass stars form first , followed by the intermediate and then the high mass stars . in terms of the proportion of all stars formed , and for a constant star formation rate in units of mass per year , the maximum stellar mass increases with time as @xmath36 for star formation rate @xmath37 . thus , a star of mass @xmath38 forms after the proportional time given by @xmath39 for the power law portion of the imf only , with @xmath40 m@xmath0 and @xmath22 , this becomes , for masses in m@xmath0 , @xmath41 for example , in a cluster with a maximum stellar mass of 30 @xmath42 , stars with 10 m@xmath0 form in the last 20% of the time . note that this increase in time with stellar mass is only for the first appearance of a star with that mass . the _ average _ time of appearance is independent of stellar mass in the stochastic interpretation . this suggests a way to check the stochastic model of birth orders . if the average time of appearance of all stars with mass @xmath34 is the average age of the cloud , and this is true for any @xmath34 , and if the first time of appearance of a star with mass @xmath34 increases with time , as described above , then the birth order is dominated by stochastic effects . figure [ fig : mt ] shows the relative birth order of stars in the random sampling imf model by elmegreen ( 1998 ) . each point marks the earliest time of formation of a model star with that mass , among all of the stars that formed in 11 clusters on the left and 6 clusters on the right . each cluster contains 200 to 500 stars and is independently generated . the plot shows a distribution of points that traces the inverse of the imf in log intervals . the fiducial line has a slope of @xmath43 for comparison . the increase at low mass occurs because the model uses a gaussian probability for failure to form a star at low mass , which is an arbitrary assumption at this time ( it causes the model imf to turn over at low mass ) . there are no quantitative measures yet of how the earliest appearance of a star with a particular mass increases with time relative to the birth order of all stars , so the predictions of theory can not yet be checked . in a real star - forming region , the star formation rate is probably not constant in time , so the ordinate in figure [ fig : mt ] should not be time , but star number in its proper birth order ; i.e. one should plot , for the first appearance of a star of mass @xmath34 , its mass versus the number of stars that formed before it . an interesting implication of the above two discussions is that _ massive stars must not be able to severely limit or halt star formation in their primordial clouds . _ if they did , then , considering their relatively late appearance , each cloud would produce stars with the same local imf up to some maximum stellar mass at which point the cloud is finally destroyed . this maximum stellar mass at the time of cloud destruction is presumably larger for more massive clouds , because it is harder to destroy a massive cloud than a low mass cloud . thus the summed imf from many regions of star formation would be steeper than the local imf in each region , for the reasons discussed above , and we could not explain why the integral imf in a galaxy is the same as the cluster imf . perhaps massive stars only shred the low density parts of these clouds , allowing ( or perhaps stimulating ) , most of the cores that have already formed in these regions to continue their evolution toward stars . in view of this , it seems that stars of all mass are probably equally likely to form in any cloud ( that contains at least this much mass ) , regardless of what other stars have formed before them . moreover , the maximum stellar mass is not physically limited , it is only statistically limited in the sense that extremely massive stars are rare . an exception to this conclusion may arise in the `` field '' population studied by massey et al . ( 1995b ) , in which the summed imf of presumed dispersed clusters appears to be steeper than the imf in each . maybe massive stars can more easily disrupt their clouds in low pressure `` field '' environments . on the other hand , maybe the massey et al . observation can be explained in other ways . a third peculiarity of the imf is that massive stars are often closer to a cluster center than low mass stars . this effect has been discussed for a long time ( e.g. , sagar et al . 1988 ) , but it was never certain whether the observations reflected a birth position , or just a relaxation effect after the cluster formed . thermal relaxation makes the high mass stars sink to the center of the cluster , on average , in a thermalization time scale . however , hillenbrand & hartmann ( 1998 ) and bonnell & davies ( 1998 ) have recently shown that this peculiar mass distribution , which is observed in the trapezium cluster , could not result from thermalization because the orion cluster is too young ( see also jones & walker 1988 ) . similar mass segregation has been observed in ngc 2157 ( fischer et al . thus it is an effect that should be explained by an imf theory , and it is likely to result from a physical process during star formation rather than stochastic sampling . there have been many attempts to explain this relative birth position ( see reviews in larson 1991 , and zinnecker , mccaughrean & wilking 1993 ) , including excess gas clump collisions in the center of a cloud ( larson 1990 ; stahler , palla , & ho 1998 ) , excess gas accretion onto protostars in the cloud core ( larson 1978 ; larson 1982 ; zinnecker 1982 ; bonnell et al . 1997 ) , enhanced gas drag for massive protostars ( larson 1990 , 1991 ) , late - time formation of high mass stars in a collapsing cloud ( murray & lin 1996 ) , and hierarchical cloud structure in which the massive trunk of a hierarchical tree for the gas cloud is closer to the center of the tree than the low - mass branches ( elmegreen 1998 ) . a combination of these effects might be involved . there are evidently four distinct physical effects that have to be explained by a theory of the imf : + ( 1 ) the power - law slope at intermediate to high stellar mass , with a value close to that found by salpeter ( 1955 ) ; + ( 2 ) the flattening at low mass for clusters and star - forming regions in our galaxy ; + ( 3 ) the increase in the transition mass between power - law and flat regions of the imf in starburst galaxies , + ( 4 ) the preferential birth of high mass stars close to cluster centers . there are apparently three additional observations that can be explained by stochastic sampling effects : + ( 1 ) the tendency for the largest mass star in a region to increase with the total number of stars ; + ( 2 ) the tendency for the largest mass stars to form last , and + ( 3 ) the seemingly random variations in the intermediate and high mass imf slopes from region to region , along with the appearance of gaps , ledges , and other peculiar departures from a power law . in addition to these observations , there are tentative indications that other imf features may be present , including : + ( 1 ) a turnover at low mass , and + ( 2 ) a steepening of the power - law part in field regions . + future observations should be able to illuminate these uncertain features . the theory of the imf depends on both the theory of star formation and the theory of cloud structure . because of the complexity of these issues , the imf may not be understood for a long time . here we review some recent developments . previous reviews were in cayrel ( 1990 ) and clarke ( 1998 ) . one of the key problems in understanding the origin of the imf is to determine the processes that limit the pre - stellar gas accretion onto a star and define the star s final mass . there have been several ideas on this . the final mass could result from the star s own ability to limit the accretion of new gas onto its surface , perhaps because of an intense proto - stellar wind ( larson 1982 ; shu , adams , & lizano 1987 ) , which is known to exist at this phase of evolution ( lada 1985 ) . this possibility has led to several theories of the imf . one , proposed by nakano , hasegawa , & norman ( 1995 ) , considered three mass - limiting agents : protostellar winds , ionization , and depletion of the gas clump in which the star forms . they concluded that under normal conditions , the protostellar wind would limit the accretion . then they calculated the fraction of the clump that would get into the star , finding that the final star mass scaled with the clump mass to the @xmath44 power . to get an imf slope of @xmath45 , which they got from the field - star imf in scalo ( 1986 ) , they required a very steep clump mass spectrum , @xmath46 in linear intervals , instead of the usual observation of @xmath47 with @xmath48 ( blitz 1993 ; kramer et al . they justified this steep clump spectrum by noting that if the linewidths found in a cs survey of orion clumps ( tatematsu et al . 1993 ) were assumed to be virial velocities , and the masses calculated accordingly , then the orion cs clumps would have such a spectrum . another imf model with wind - limited stellar masses was proposed by adams & fatuzzo ( 1996 ) . they conjectured that the stellar luminosity scales with the wind mass loss rate , which , at the time when the accretion stops , is proportional to the direct accretion rate onto the star , independent of what goes onto the disk . this gave them a relation between the stellar properties , i.e. , luminosity and mass , and the gas cloud properties , sound speed and angular rotation rate . the angular rotation rate entered because they had to determine the fraction of the accreting gas that goes into the star and not the disk . finally , they related the stellar mass to the total luminosity of the star , from the sum of the accretion - driven luminosity , which depends on mass , and the luminosity of a main sequence star at intermediate mass , from the standard mass - luminosity relation . the result is a relation between stellar mass and the cloud properties , i.e. , sound speed and rotation rate . taking the mass distribution for clumps with the observed slope @xmath9 discussed above , and the empirical relationship between clump mass and velocity dispersion from larson s ( 1981 ) laws , they got a distribution function for the clump velocity dispersion , which then led to a distribution function for the final star mass if the angular rate of all the clumps is the same . adams & fatuzzo ( 1996 ) also discussed more general equations giving the stellar mass from cloud properties , considering random variations in these cloud properties , and derived a log - normal final mass distribution , as in larson ( 1973 ) , elmegreen & mathieu ( 1983 ) , zinnecker ( 1984 ) , and elmegreen ( 1985 ) . silk ( 1995 ) also got a relation between cloud core mass and turbulent linewidth , different from adams & fatuzzo s , considering centrifugally supported cores with luminosities equal to the accretion luminosities . he considered an equality between the turbulent linewidth and the thermal velocity in the core , which entered into the luminosity through the temperature using the usual radiative transfer equation for a star and the rossland mean opacity . then , after substituting the empirical correlations between clump rotation rate and size , and between linewidth and size , he got the cloud core mass as a function of the turbulent linewidth . the distribution function for cloud core mass then followed from a distribution function for linewidth , which came from a theory for the time - dependent deceleration of wind - driven bubbles in a cloud . the star mass is then taken to be proportional to the cloud core mass . silk ( 1995 ) made several comments that protostellar outflows limit the mass of a star , but this assumption was not present in any of the theory in his paper , nor in the imf that resulted , particularly considering that a fixed fraction of the cloud core mass was assumed to go into the star . this was unlike the results of the wind - limited accretion models proposed by nakano , hasegawa , & norman ( 1995 ) and adams & fatuzzo ( 1996 ) . one of the most popular and persistent methods for determining the mass of a star has been with a combination of cloud fragmentation , accretion , and clump collisions . larson ( 1978 ) showed with three - dimensional n - body experiments that gas clouds fragment hierarchically by self - gravity , and the fragments accrete material in competition with each other . the resulting mass distribution was modeled after a fractal , which was a remarkably prescient concept in astronomy considering that mandelbrot ( 1977 ) began to popularize his fractal geometry only a year earlier . larson showed that the fractal mass function would have a slope of about @xmath49 , in reasonable agreement with observations . larson also reasoned that the lower mass limit to a star is the thermal jeans mass in the cloud because smaller condensations are not likely to form in the initial collapse . this experiment was an important departure from standard fragmentation models of the time , since it was previously believed , following hoyle ( 1953 ) and hunter ( 1962 ) , that fragmentation decreased the jeans mass , leading to ever more fragmentation . in larson s result , the number of clumps formed was about equal to the number of jeans masses in the initial cloud , with no subfragmentation into smaller pieces . this result was seconded by tohline ( 1980 ) , but investigated again by silk ( 1982 ) , who concluded that initial cloud fragments , particularly elongated fragments , formed by dynamical collapse could in fact fragment again ( see also bonnell & bastien 1993 , burkert et al . 1997 ) . silk ( 1977 ) considered a different picture of cloud fragmentation , using a thermal jeans mass that increased with time as a result of heating from the stars that already formed . his model of fragmentation was simpler than larson s , so there was no built - in , power - law mass spectrum from the fragmentation process itself . the power law in silk s model came from the time increase in the thermal jeans mass and the identification of this mass with the stellar mass at all times . yoshii & saio ( 1985 ) followed this model by considering the additional influence of coalescence among the opacity - limited fragments . they showed that the opaque fragments are usually so small that coalescence is unimportant ; thus fragmentation and heating alone determine the imf as a time sequence of increasing thermal jeans masses , as in the silk ( 1977 ) model . bastien ( 1981 ) obtained a different result by using the jeans length to determine the fragment collision cross section . the initial jeans length is much larger than the size of the opaque fragments considered by yoshii & saio ( 1985 ) , so bastien ( 1981 ) found that fragment collisions were important . subsequent work by lejeune & bastien ( 1986 ) , and allen & bastien ( 1995 , 1996 ) considered time - dependent coalescence , and concluded again that both fragmentation and coalescence were important , with coalescence dominating the formation of massive stars . price & podsiadlowski ( 1995 ) used protostar collisions in a different way . they proposed that stars grow by accretion at some more - or - less uniform rate , and this accretion stops when two protostars collide , disrupting the gas reservoirs from each . the final stellar mass was then determined by the product of the accretion rate and the time interval between collisions . the imf was built up over time as the final stellar mass decreased in the presence of an increasing collision rate that resulted from the continuous formation of more and more protostars . another coagulation model was proposed by murray & lin ( 1996 ) . they suggested that fragmentation driven by thermal instabilities leads to clumps that fall in the potential well of a cloud , after which they collide and coalesce with other clumps that have fallen too . a star forms when the clump mass exceeds the thermal jeans mass , although further coalescence can increase that mass afterwards . the power - law distribution of masses follows from the coagulation process , in a manner similar to that proposed by silk & takahashi ( 1979 ) . there is no assumption about wind - limited accretion here ; the star mass is identified with the core mass directly . an interesting aspect of their model is that they considered positionally correlated velocities , as in a turbulent fluid , but they showed this had no important effect on the model imf . numerical sph simulations of an evolving imf made of accreting , pseudo - star particle clumps was done by bonnell et al . the advantages of numerical solutions like this is that they can treat well the competition for gas among all the nucleated centers . they found that nucleating centers originally close to the center of the whole cloud grow faster and to larger masses because of the larger gas density there . a different class of theory considers only the statistical aspects of the imf . the hoyle ( 1953 ) picture of fragmentation led naturally to these ideas , because successive fragmentation produces hierarchical structure and power law mass spectra regardless of many physical details . larson ( 1973 ) considered a modification to these ideas by proposing that only part of each fragment undergoes further fragmentation , and got from this a log - normal mass distribution instead of a power - law . when miller & scalo ( 1979 ) proposed that the imf actually had a log - normal form , the statistical implications of this were developed further by elmegreen & mathieu ( 1983 ) , zinnecker ( 1984 ) , and elmegreen ( 1985 ) , who showed that a variety of processes , acting together , would combine to make a log - normal function , regardless of the distribution functions resulting from each separate process . this point was made again more recently by adams & fatuzzo ( 1996 ) . the most recent development in this area has been by elmegreen ( 1997a , 1998 ) , who considered the random selection of masses from a hierarchically structured cloud . these papers depart from the usual scenarios by asserting that hierarchical cloud structure is independent of star formation that it is set up long before star formation begins in the diffuse cloud stage , and then continuously reestablished during the molecular cloud stage as a result of supersonic turbulence compression . there is no gravitationally - driven fragmentation at all , and no significant clump coalescence . in fact , the clumps in this model need not even be constant objects , able to move around and coalesce ; they can be ever - changing gas compressions and wavepackets in the chaotic turbulent flow . this model is motivated by the pervasive appearance of hierarchical structure and spatially - correlated velocities in interstellar clouds . these features are reminiscent of structures and flows in laboratory turbulence ( e.g. , see reviews in sreenivasan 1991 , and falgarone & phillips 1991 ) . the basic point of the elmegreen ( 1997a , 1998 ) model is that essentially all local star formation processes that have been considered in detail have a time scale for evolution that varies approximately as the inverse square root of local density , including contraction or collapse from self - gravity , turbulence compression , magnetic diffusion in virialized cores , and coalescence at each level in the hierarchy . this means that in a model like this , stars will appear here and there , randomly , alone or with neighbors , at a rate that depends almost exclusively on the local square root of density . on a large scale , this implies that dense clouds in high pressure regions of galaxies will form all of their stars quickly , while low density clouds in low pressure regions will take much more time . on a small scale , within any one cloud , it means that different parts of the hierarchy form stars at different times . the density always increases at lower levels in a hierarchical structure , and this is where the clumps , contained by other clumps on larger scales , are small and have low mass . thus the low mass pieces in a cloud are likely to form stars first . as a result , there is slightly less mass for other stars that form later in the same or higher levels . this competition for mass tends to steepen the power in the power - law mass function by several tenths , i.e. , from @xmath49 to @xmath22 , as in the salpeter imf . perhaps a more important difference in this new model is the way in which cloud structure is measured . typically , the power law index for molecular and diffuse cloud structure is determined from the mass distribution of separate clumps , resolved in large - scale surveys by various telescopes and then separated into discrete objects either by eye or by computer algorithms that do about the same thing as the eye . these mass distributions are always much flatter than the imf , having slopes @xmath9 in the range from 1.5 to 1.8 , when the imf has a slope of about @xmath50 . to understand the imf , however , we have to try to view interstellar clouds from the perspective of a forming star . a star does not care about the clumps that our telescopes resolve and our eyes choose to label as discrete , but only about the general distribution and motion of gas in all forms . in pre - star - forming clouds , where this structure is first established , it is largely hierarchical , from scales that are much smaller than mm - wave telescopes can resolve , up to perhaps a galactic scale height . hierarchical means that most of the small clouds are contained inside larger clouds , and most small stellar groupings are inside larger stellar groupings ( see review in elmegreen & efremov 1998 ) . for example , efremov ( 1995 ) and colleagues have estimated that 90% of the ob associations in the milky way ( efremov & sitnik 1988 ) , m31 ( efremov , ivanov , & nikolov 1987 ; battinelli 1991 , 1992 ; magnier et al . 1993 ; battinelli , efremov & magnier 1996 ) , m33 ( ivanov 1987 , 1992 ) , and the lmc ( feitzinger & braunsfurth 1984 ) are inside larger star complexes . scalo ( 1985 ) has reviewed hierarchical structure for interstellar clouds . it appears as if the hierarchical embedding of interstellar and young stellar structures is nearly all - inclusive . emission line surveys leading to `` discrete '' clump masses do not consider this aspect of cloud structure . if two clumps are close together and part of a larger structure , the algorithms call them two separate objects , and do not tabulate the larger `` object '' that contains them . for this reason , all emission line or extinction surveys catalogue clouds that are within a factor of @xmath51 to 10 of the angular resolution , regardless of the cloud distance or the wavelength of the observation . this factor of @xmath52 for recognized clump size corresponds to a factor of @xmath53 for cloud mass ( which scales as the size squared or cubed in co surveys ) , so the mass functions look reasonably well sampled , but in fact only a small part of the cloud structure is included . everything smaller than the telescope resolution is not seen , and everything larger than about 3 to 10 resolution elements is subdivided into its component parts and not called a separate object . this is how every cloud or clump mass function has been evaluated since the beginning of this exercise ( i.e. , since before field & saslaw 1965 ) . the elmegreen ( 1997a , 1998 ) model takes a different point of view . it considers the structure on all scales and asks for the probability that any particular mass is chosen from anywhere in the whole hierarchy . this is presumably what happens as a result of the combination of physical processes that leads to star formation in a real cloud : because of the self - similar nature of turbulent flows , each level in the hierarchy looks the same as any other level ( for masses above the thermal jeans mass ) , so each choice of level for a star - formation event would have the same likelihood as any other choice , modulated only by the density - dependent local evolution rate discussed in the previous paragraph . aside from this variable rate , the instantaneous distribution of masses for all structures , and the instantaneous probability of selecting any particular mass , is proportional to @xmath54 for linear intervals in mass ( i.e. , @xmath55 in the notation of the clump spectra given above ) . such a distribution for hierarchical structure was also recognized by larson ( 1978 ) and fleck ( 1996 ) . the result gives a steeper instantaneous mass function than emission line or extinction surveys , but there is no conservation of mass as in these standard surveys ( i.e. , the sum of the masses of all possible structures is larger than the mass of the whole cloud , because nearly all of the structures are contained in other structures , and so are multiply counted ) . this way of viewing cloud structure seems to be closer to what a real star - forming process `` sees '' before it actually begins the sequence of events that makes a star . the density dependent rate of star formation then steepens the mass function from @xmath54 to @xmath56 . this result is then identified with the salpeter imf . for the purposes of understanding the imf , there are probably better ways to measure cloud structures than with clump - finding algorithms . the structure on the edges of clouds has been analyzed in terms of fractals , rather than clumps , for many years ( beech 1987 ; bazell & dsert 1988 ; scalo 1990 ; dickman , horvath , & margulis 1990 ; falgarone , phillips , & walker 1991 ; zimmermann & stutzki 1992 , 1993 ; henriksen , 1991 ; hetem & lepine 1993 ; vogelaar & wakker 1994 ; pfenniger & combes 1994 ) . for the structures inside clouds , stutzki et al . ( 1998 ) showed that fourier transform power spectra of emission line intensity scans across molecular clouds gave power laws , and concluded that the internal structure was scale - invariant , as in a fractal . they reproduced this structure with a random fractal - generation model . other models that made cloud fractals were in hetem & lepine ( 1993 ) and elmegreen ( 1997b ) . the concept that the cloud mass distribution function is the result of fractal structure , presumably generated by turbulence , began with papers by fleck ( 1996 ) , elmegreen & falgarone ( 1996 ) , and stutzki et al . this seems to be a more reasonable explanation than the older collisional - build - up models of clump structure , particularly since off - center supersonic collisions between clumps should not be sticky ( scalo & pumphrey 1982 ; kimura & tosa 1996 ; fujimoto , & kumai 1997 ) . the probability of selecting structures for star formation in hierarchical clouds seems to show up more directly in the distribution of masses for open clusters . when a bound cluster forms , a high fraction of the gas mass has to go into stars ( see verschueren 1990 and references therein ) , so the cluster mass distribution should reflect the mass distribution of cloud structures pretty well . in this case , the result is obviously independent of telescope resolution or cloud - clump recognition bias , because clusters are seen optically , even at great distances . also , the range of masses for clusters can be reasonably large , exceeding a factor of 100 , so a power law can be measured fairly well if it exists . cluster selection suffers from various other biases , however , such as extinction , age limitations , and a loss of low - mass clusters with increasing distance . nevertheless , there are some studies that get around these biases , and they confirm the expected result . in two samples of nearby clusters , each with calibrated masses , battinelli et al . ( 1994 ) found power law mass functions with slopes of @xmath57 and @xmath58 . these clusters are close enough to the sun to be relatively free of distance and extinction effects . also , in the lmc , where @xmath59 clusters are catalogued ( bica et al . 1996 ) , calibrated photometrically for age ( girardi et al 1995 ) , and all at about the same distance , elmegreen & efremov ( 1997 ) found @xmath60 mass functions for discrete age groups ( e.g. , @xmath61 yrs ; dividing the clusters into age groups is important when there are no direct measures of cluster mass , because the conversion from luminosity to mass depends on age ) . the imf should be steeper than the cluster mass function because of the density - dependent formation rate of individual stars , and the competition for mass in the imf . these effects are not important for clusters . open clusters take a high fraction of all the gas mass originally available to them ( or else they would not have ended up bound ) , and the rate at which they do this is not important for their final masses . in the case of stars , new objects forming at one level steal mass away from the objects that form later at a higher level . but clusters do not do this : those which form inside other clusters in the general hierarchy can just merge together to make a single cluster of higher mass , appropriate to the higher level in the hierarchy . and if they do not merge , then they stay with their original masses , which are appropriate for the levels in which they form . other imf models based on fractal or hierarchical cloud structure were developed earlier by henriksen ( 1986 , 1991 ) and larson ( 1992 ) . henriksen used the size , @xmath62 , distribution function of structures in a fractal of dimension @xmath63 , given as @xmath64 by mandelbrot ( 1983 ) , and assumed that the density @xmath65 varied with size too , not as in a fractal ( which would be @xmath66 ) but as actually observed in self - gravitating clouds , namely @xmath67 . this gave a mass function for cloud structure that agreed well with observations if @xmath68 . note that if henriksen used the density dependence for a fractal , in a self - consistent manner with the size distribution , then the resulting mass function would have been independent of the fractal dimension , @xmath60 , as discussed above for hierarchical clouds in general . larson ( 1992 ) started again with the size distribution for a fractal , and assumed that final stellar mass is directly proportional to the linear size of the cloud structure , suggesting that such structures were filamentary anyway . then the slope of the imf in linear intervals became @xmath69 for @xmath70 , as implied by the fractal dimension of cloud perimeters , namely @xmath71 , added to 1 to account for the higher dimension of the surface . this imf , with a slope of @xmath72 , is significantly steeper than the salpeter imf , with a slope of @xmath73 , but larson suggested that maybe stars form in subparts of clouds where @xmath63 is smaller than 2.3 , or perhaps larger structures have larger temperatures , which would break the assumed linear relationship between star mass and scale size . these models differ from the elmegreen ( 1997a , 1998 ) model , even though both employ `` fractal '' cloud structure , because the latter uses general cloud shapes , not necessarily filaments or sheets , random sampling from all levels in the hierarchy of structures ( giving @xmath60 from sampling alone ) , a density - dependent rate that steepens the imf by preferred sampling at lower mass ( i.e. , steepening the result to @xmath74 ) , and a competition for mass , which steepens the imf further , to @xmath75 , as in the salpeter imf . with these different assumptions , the imf in the elmegreen model hardly depends on the fractal dimension at all ; it enters into the exponent of the imf power law as approximately @xmath76 , which is a very small increment for @xmath63 in the likely range of 2 to 3 . understanding the lower mass limit to star formation is an important part of any imf theory . various assumptions about this have already been mentioned in the review of theories presented above . three views on this subject seem to pervade most of them . in the wind - limited accretion models , the assumption is made that accretion onto a dense core continues until a protostellar wind develops , which presumably follows the onset of deuterium burning ( shu et al . thus low mass objects do not stay that way very long , they just keep accreting until they become active protostars . in most of the older fragmentation - coalescence models , the minimum mass is the mass of a gravitationally bound fragment that is optically thick . in the various scale - free models , based on gravitationally - driven fragmentation or turbulence , the minimum mass is usually the thermal jeans mass , particularly in the larson ( 1992 ) and elmegreen ( 1997a , 1998 ) models . this assumption is made because , without further fragmentation during the collapse itself , the thermal jeans mass is the smallest structure that can ever become self - gravitating , even in the presence of turbulence and magnetic fields . the first and the third of these mass limits equals about the observed limit , @xmath4 m@xmath0 . in the first case , it is self - defining : objects accrete until they become star - like , and then they stop accreting , so naturally the lowest possible mass is the mass of a star . this concept has the powerful advantage over the others that the basic star mass , and perhaps even the imf itself , can be the same everywhere , independent of cloud conditions . in the third case , the minimum theoretical mass just happens to equal the observed minimum in standard cloud conditions . an expression for this mass is the bonner - ebert critical mass , @xmath77 here we have normalized the result to standard cloud conditions , taking the pressure inside a cloud equal to the typical self - gravitating core pressure , not the boundary pressure ( which is sometimes lower by a factor of @xmath78 ) . our use of this form for the thermal jeans mass is motivated by the near constancy of @xmath79 and total @xmath80 in molecular clouds , according to the scaling relations ( larson 1981 ) . this is much more sensible than writing the thermal jeans mass in terms of @xmath79 and density , for example , when the density varies by several orders of magnitude inside a cloud . our use of the total pressure for @xmath80 also allows for a decrease of jeans mass in compressive flows , as in hunter & fleck ( 1982 ) . nevertheless , another theory of the imf in which all of the stellar masses have the local thermal jeans mass has been advanced by padoan , nordlund , & jones ( 1997 ) , with variations in mass entirely the result of variations in the density in a turbulent fluid . in this model , the high mass stars form in the low density regions , because the jeans mass is high there for a given temperature . the second minimum fragment mass discussed above , from the opacity limit of a self - gravitating condensation , is typically much smaller than the minimum star mass , so coalescence has to bring the star mass up to the observed value in these models . larson has looked for signatures of the thermal jeans mass in several ways , predicting that it should vary with cloud temperature ( larson 1985 , 1992 ) . in larson ( 1992 ) , he suggested that such variations were observed by myers ( 1991 ) in different molecular clouds . larson ( 1995 ) also suggested that the length scale at a break in the separation distribution for t tauri stars was the jeans length ( see also simon 1997 ; but see bate , clarke , & mccaughrean 1998 and nakajima et al . 1998 for other interpretations . ) elmegreen ( 1997a , 1998 ) considered @xmath81 from a different point of view , stating that most star - forming regions in normal galaxies actually do have nearly constant values of @xmath82 , with small variations in this quantity possibly leading to the observed variations in cluster imfs at low mass ( see section [ sect : intro ] above ) . this constancy is a result of the numerator in @xmath81 being approximately proportional to the cooling rate per unit mass of molecular gas ( neufeld , lepp , & melnick 1995 ) , and the denominator being approximately proportional to the local surface density of stars and gas in the galaxy , which determine the heating rate per unit mass from cosmic rays and background starlight . as long as cooling roughly balances background heating , this ratio will be about constant . other , more local variations in @xmath79 and @xmath80 tend to cancel out when combined as the quantity @xmath82 . for example , when @xmath80 goes up in a triggered region next to a previous generation of star - formation , @xmath79 generally goes up too because of the enhanced radiation field . conversely , when @xmath80 is low , as in low - mass clouds like taurus , then @xmath79 is low as well . elmegreen ( 1997a , 1998 ) also points out that the lower mass limit for stars actually _ does _ change , perhaps by a factor of 10 in extreme starburst regions ( see sect . [ sect : intro ] above ) where the average @xmath79 can be much larger than in local molecular clouds , e.g. , 100 k instead of 10 k ( cf . aalto et al . 1995 ) , and the pressure much larger too ( e.g. , @xmath83 ) . but this variation should be rare in normal galaxies because of feedback processes in the interstellar medium that tend to connect young stellar activity , interstellar pressure , and gas temperature . if we consider @xmath79 to be a measure of the rate of cooling per unit cloud mass , then @xmath79 in a star - forming region will be high when there is an unusually large embedded or nearby luminosity of stars per unit gas mass . this occurs when the efficiency for star formation is high in a high mass cluster ( the cluster has to be fairly high mass to contain the luminous stars that dominate the total radiation field ) . a high efficiency in a low mass cluster would not necessarily increase @xmath81 because low mass clusters are not very luminous per unit mass . a low efficiency in a high mass cluster , leading to an ob association , might not change @xmath81 much either , because the radiation luminosity per unit gas mass is not particularly large there either . thus the formation of globular clusters in regions with only moderately large pressures , not the enormous pressures typical of early galactic halos , might be elevate @xmath81 , but this conclusion is very uncertain . figure [ fig : mj ] shows two numerical experiments that made model imfs from random selections in a hierarchically structured gas cloud , using a rate of selection proportional to the square root of the gas density , as discussed above ( elmegreen 1997a ) . the models differ only in the value of @xmath81 , which enters into the probability for failure to form a star , taken to be @xmath84 in these cases ( @xmath81 in the figure is written in terms of the computer - program mass , which is scaled to a physical mass after multiplication by @xmath85 . the imfs are identical except for the larger value of the lower mass limit in the case with high @xmath81 . the two main contenders for the lower mass limit of star formation , wind - regulation and the thermal jeans mass , have obvious differences in predicted behaviors of the shape of the imf at low mass . if this shape varies a lot , with some clusters having clearly higher lower mass limits than other clusters , then wind self - regulation might be ruled out . moreover , if cluster imfs in regions with large turnover masses also have larger pre - stellar @xmath81 , then the thermal jeans mass would seem to be important . curiously , both of these models , the wind - regulated imf , and the @xmath81fractal cloud model , have their strong points where the other is weakest . the wind - regulated imf model seems to have difficulty explaining the nearly universal slope of the imf without some sensitivity to cloud parameters , yet it seems certain that wind self - regulation must play some role in determining the mass that gets onto a star , at least near the lower mass limit for star formation . similarly , models that rely on @xmath81 have an uncomfortable susceptibility to changes in cloud properties near the lower mass limit , but get the salpeter slope above this limit with essentially no free parameters . perhaps a combination of the two models would be better . there are several ways this could occur . first , the fractal model supposes that a star s mass can be identified with the mass of some structure in a turbulent cloud , but this is obviously too simple there is a lot that can happen during star formation that will vary the fraction of the cloud mass that gets into a star . if this fraction is randomly distributed , then the same imf slope and scatter about that slope result , as shown in connection with figure [ fig : scatter ] below , which is discussed in more detail in elmegreen ( 1998 ) . if it is not randomly distributed , then the power - law slope could change . but the entire power - law slope is not likely to come from wind - regulation , that would give the slope too great a sensitivity to cloud properties and the randomness of wind - clearing . this means that , perhaps to within a factor of 2 to 5 , star mass should really be identified with the mass of the clump in which it forms , i.e. , that bigger stars really do form in bigger clumps ( casoli et al . 1986 ; myers , ladd , & fuller 1991 ; myers & fuller 1993 ; pound & blitz 1995 ; motte , andr , & neri 1998 ; not to be confused with the statistical sampling statement discussed in section [ sect : intro ] , that bigger stars form in bigger _ whole _ clouds ) . this factor of 2 to 5 may contain all the detailed physics of wind clearing . protostellar winds should also play some role in regulating the smallest stars that form . according to the models by shu and collaborators , as reviewed in shu et al . ( 1987 ) , the onset of the wind is triggered by deuterium burning in a young , pre - stellar object . if the object is too small , there will be no wind , and presumably accretion will continue until deuterium burning begins . this concept combines well with the arguments based on a thermal jean mass . for example , if @xmath81 is much smaller than the deuterium burning limit , then a large number of small brown dwarfs or jupiters should form , and these could either leave the cloud in that state , forever drifting as brown dwarfs , or they could accrete more mass over time and end up finally able to start a wind . in the latter case , the effective lower mass limit to the imf would be the deuterium burning mass , not @xmath81 , and the larger masses would follow the fractal mass distribution as before , giving the salpeter function . on the other hand , if there are a lot of free brown dwarfs , which does not appear to be the case in the solar vicinity ( cf . [ sect : intro ] ) , and if there are also a lot of regions where @xmath81 is low , which does not appear to be the case locally either , then a model with accretion up to a wind - limited mass would not seem to work . if @xmath81 is much larger than the deuterium burning limit , then large , self - gravitating clumps will form in the cloud , but the rapid onset of a wind in these clouds might limit the gas mass that actually gets into the star to only a small fraction of what is available . then all of the excess mass between the deuterium limit and m@xmath86 would get dispersed back into the cloud for recycling into other stars , and the lower mass limit would be the deuterium limit . in this second case , the mass fraction that goes into each star will be small , but if it is about the same fraction for all clumps , then the higher mass stars will still map out the fractal properties of the cloud and produce the salpeter imf . again the details of how the imf gets established in a cloud depend strongly on unknown processes during the final collapse and dispersal phase of star formation , but the basic shape of the imf could be relatively independent of these details . there have been some fundamental changes lately in how we view molecular clouds and star formation , and these changes inevitably affect the various models for the imf . for example , we are beginning to think that star formation is relatively rapid in cloud cores , occurring in only one or two crossing times regardless of scale ( elmegreen & efremov 1996 ; efremov & elmegreen 1998 ) . this means that we can not generally wait for magnetic diffusion to occur as a cloud core slowly accretes across field lines . diffusion typically takes about 10 free fall times for cosmic ray ionization ( shu et al . 1987 ) , longer for ionization by starlight ( myers & khersonsky 1995 ) , and longer still if the gas is clumpy ( elmegreen & combes 1992 ) . indeed , nakano ( 1998 ) suggested that all star - forming cloud cores are magnetically _ super_critical ; i.e. , they would collapse dynamically across the field lines if turbulent motions were not present . there are two important implications of this change in thinking , if correct . first , there would no longer be a strong motivation for imf theories that consider bimodel star formation in the sense that low mass stars come from subcritical cores , and high mass stars come from magnetically supercritical cores ( lizano & shu 1988 ) . the imf is so remarkably uniform anyway , it does not seem possible to have widely different modes of star formation at high and low mass . any change from low mass dominance to high mass dominance in the imf could more easily be accommodated by an upward shift in the thermal jeans mass ( cf . section [ sect : theorylm ] ) . secondly , this time scale for star formation may be too short to allow multiple interactions between protostellar clumps . this would then rule out a broad class of coalescence and slow accretion models . such coalescence is unlikely anyway for clumps that move supersonically relative to each other ; they will fragment or disperse upon collision , rather than stick together . clump collisions may trigger star formation when they occur ( bhattal et al . 1998 ) , but multiple collisions are probably not the source of the cloud or star mass distributions . another observation that suggests the same thing is the extremely high stellar densities in young globular clusters , which form today in starburst regions . as suggested in section [ sect : intro ] , these globulars look like they will evolve into objects similar to our milky way s halo globulars , and the old milky way globulars have an apparently normal imf . if coalescence is important in local `` normal '' embedded clusters , it would seem to be devastating in globular clusters , where the stellar density can be @xmath87 times higher . conversely , if these globulars have normal imfs , then protostellar coalescence must be unimportant nearly everywhere . a similar constraint would come from the imf in small regions , where only a few stars form . there , protostar interactions are not likely to be important either . a second major shift in our view of molecular clouds is that most astronomers now think that pre - stellar structure comes from turbulence , not gravitationally - driven fragmentation . this is because the same character of structure is observed in both self - gravitating and non - self - gravitating clouds , and both types of clouds have correlated motions reminiscent of laboratory turbulence . a related point is that the cloud cores in which clusters form are not obviously collapsing as a whole : there are no inverse p - cygni profiles indicative of collapse motions for whole cores , as there are in some individual protostars . the stars are apparently forming inside more - or - less stable cloud cores . once again , the general collapse models seem untenable . the presence of supersonic turbulence also seems to rule out models involving thermal instabilities . turbulent motions in cluster - forming cores are generally much larger than thermal , and so the dominant forces that structure the gas are the turbulent forces , not the thermal . this means that turbulence causes the observed structures in pre - stellar clouds , not thermal instabilities . thermal processes are probably important on the smallest scales , but these are at and below @xmath81 . turbulence in pre - stellar clouds also appears to generate structure that is much lower in mass than even the smallest stars , perhaps as low as @xmath88 m@xmath0 ( heithausen et al . 1998 ; kramer et al . this means that star formation occurs in the middle range of all cloud structures , not at the bottom end . it also means that , while turbulence may generate a cascade of structures down to smaller and smaller scales , the end result of this cascade is not the formation of a star . turbulence makes cloud structures independent of star formation . self - gravity , sonic wave generation , magnetic reconnection , and many other aspects of interstellar cloud dynamics are likely to be important too by the time star formation begins . the remarkable near - uniformity of the imf in regions with a wide range of stellar densities , cluster masses , metallicities , ages , and galactic types strongly suggests there is a _ unifying process in star formation _ that makes the relative probability of forming various masses somewhat independent of physical parameters . for example , the imf seems independent of how star formation begins , i.e. , whether the region is triggered by some external pressure or forms quiescently ( e.g. see parker et al . 1992 and the contrary opinion by oey & massey 1995 ) , independent of the general cloud shape ( shell , layer , filament , etc . ) , magnetic field strength , ionization level , presence of other stars , and so on . this is remarkable because these physical variables do control the _ rate _ of star formation in some regions , and they certainly control _ where and when _ star formation begins . they just do not appear to influence the imf . the near - uniformity of the _ slope _ of the power law also implies several other things . ( 1 ) there is a _ universal aspect of cloud structure and evolution that produces the power - law portion of the imf independently of the temperature , pressure , and metallicity . _ this means that the power - law probably does not depend on the protostellar collapse process , e.g. , on the fragmentation or collapse of isothermal clumps , the accretion of gas in thermal equilibrium , or the thermal jeans mass . for all of these processes , thermal temperature and magnetic diffusion are probably important at some stage ( see reviews in nakano 1984 ; mouschovias 1991 ; shu , adams , & lizano 1987 ) . ( 2 ) the imf power - law is also likely to be a _ highly reduced average over many physical processes that either all give about the same result , or are combined so finely in every region that the same proportion of each process is always present . _ the variations in slope of the imf from region to region ( scalo 1998 ) seem at first to suggest something different , that the imf is not in fact uniform but depends sensitively on physical conditions . but are these variations statistically significant ? rarely do studies of cluster imfs contain more than several hundred stars . figure [ fig : fluctuations ] shows sample imfs from the model of random selection in a hierarchical cloud ( elmegreen 1998 ) . the panel in the upper left shows imf slopes for 100 different models , each with a different number of stars and therefore different upper mass limit . in all cases , the range of stars chosen for the power - law slope determination is such that there are 200 stars in the fit , starting from the histogram bin that is twenty filled bins ( a factor of 3 in mass ) away from the most massive star , and going to lower mass bins . this starting point for the fit ensures that there are enough stars to get an accurate slope , and it coincides with an astronomer s decision to avoid fitting the imf to the scarce few highest - mass stars in the cluster . we pick a different number of total stars for each imf , and use only the highest mass parts of each model , because this is what an astronomer would do as well . generally an observer catalogues only the brightest stars in a cluster and misses the low mass members . if a cluster has an imf made only from low mass stars , then that cluster is generally so small that there are no high mass stars at all . evidently the imf slope varies a lot around the salpeter value , shown in the figure by the dashed line at @xmath22 . this average slope is nearly independent of physical cloud properties in this model ( see the discussion in section [ sect : theory ] ) . the other three panels in figure [ fig : fluctuations ] show particular imfs and the mass ranges and fits used for the `` x '' marks in the top left panel . figure [ fig : scatter ] shows the rms deviations in the imf slopes around the mean values for power - law fits that include different numbers of stars in the same 100 imfs ( from elmegreen 1998 ) . each plotted value , connected by a smooth line , represents the rms deviation for the 100 models , calculated in the mass range from 1 to 10 m@xmath0 ( the characteristic physical mass in the model comes from @xmath81 , which is taken to be 0.35m@xmath0 from equation [ eq : mj ] ) . the rms deviation around the salpeter slope decreases systematically as more and more stars are included in the fit . the deviation can be as high as @xmath6 when only 80 stars are used , decreasing to @xmath4 when 1000 stars are used . this implies that an imf calculated with , say , 150 stars , and having a slope of @xmath89 instead of the salpeter slope of @xmath14 , is in fact statistically consistent with this salpeter slope in a `` universal '' imf . the fluctuations found by scalo ( 1998 ) in his review correspond to @xmath6 around the value @xmath90 . these fluctuations could be statistical , considering the number of stars included in typical imf surveys and the likely presence of measurement and star selection errors in the real data . the dashed line in figure [ fig : scatter ] is for another 100 models , independent of the first , and evaluated with a large ( @xmath91 ) and random fluctuation in the ratio of the star mass to the clump mass . such variations do not affect the average imf slope or the statistical fluctuations around it . the imf has been observed directly and indirectly for many years , with many different results , but there seems to be some convergence now in the basic form of the imf , and also some tantalizing indications that this form changes a little when the physical conditions for star formation change a lot . the main observational results were summarized in section [ sect : sum1 ] . the theory of the imf seems to be all over the map , even in recent years . this variation reflects our ignorance in the processes that determine a star s mass and in the processes that cause the complex spatial structures seen in interstellar clouds . the common aspects in many of these models , including clump and protostellar interactions , wind erosion of protostellar gas concentrations , minimum masses from the lack of self - gravity , and hierarchical cloud structure , are all likely to play some role in generating the imf . the worry is that the imf is such a highly reduced average over many physical processes that each process does not a have clear signature in the final result . in view of the observations , we should perhaps consider `` acceptable '' those models that do not have much sensitivity to either the local aspects of cloud structure , or the large scale aspects of time and place in the universe . this drives the recent appeal towards models based on common turbulence in one way or another , considering that turbulent structures are likely to be robust . unfortunately , we do not understand compressible mhd turbulence much either . there are several key observations that would help . one is the determination of star formation time scales , always in units of the cloud or clump crossing time . there are three important timescales : the rise time of the star formation rate in a cloud , the duration of star formation , and the decay time scale . if the rise time is less than a crossing time , and the duration only one or two crossing times , then imf models based on multiple clump interactions would seem to be ruled out . there is also a need to know the mass dependence of the mass fraction of clump gas that goes into a star . this might be determined from the ratio of luminosity to gas mass for type 0 sources , plotted as a function of gas mass for the dense cores where the stars are actually forming . theory should tell us what gas structures and evolutionary timescales are expected from self - gravitating mhd turbulence in the supersonic - subalfvnic regime of molecular clouds . if turbulence only makes moving waves and wavepackets , and star formation actually occurs in such regions , then star formation has to be relatively quick in terms of the local crossing time . it may be that in the absence of strong self - gravity , turbulent clumps are transient and amorphous , but when self - gravity becomes important , the clumps get some integrity and persist for a relatively long time . Abstract:
[ "observations of normal galactic star - forming regions suggest there is widespread near - uniformity in the initial stellar mass function ( imf ) in spite of diverse physical conditions . fluctuations may come largely from statistical effects and observational selection . there are also tantalizing , but uncertain reports that the imf shifts systematically in peculiar regions , giving a low mass bias in quiescent gas , and a high mass bias in active starbursts . theoretical proposals for the origin of the imf are reviewed . the theories generally focus on a combination of four physical effects : wind - limited accretion of stellar mass , coalescence of protostellar gas clumps , mass limitations at the thermal jeans mass , and power - law cloud structure . hybrid theories combining the best of each may be preferred . # 1#1 0123456789 abcdef @mtlplain@loaded = cmssi10 = cmssi10 = cmssi10 = cmmib10 = mtssi10 = mtssbx10 = mtssbi10 = mtmib10 @mtlplain@loaded = cmmib10 at 10pt = cmmib10 at 7pt = cmmib10 at 5pt = = = = \" 0103 @mtlplain@loaded @mtlplain@loaded = cmbsy10 = cmbsy10 at 7pt = cmbsy10 at 5pt = = = @ = \" 0@72 to be published in `` unsolved problems in stellar evolution , '' ed . m. livio , cambridge university press , 1999 , in press ." ]
14,893
14,893
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: it has been suggested by sen @xcite that the energy gap between unstable d - brane configurations and the stable vacuum should be computable using witten s cubic string field theory ( sft ) @xcite . the level truncation scheme of @xcite has appeared to lead to very good agreement with the expected results in the context of the decay of bosonic d - branes @xcite and unstable d - branes in superstring field theory @xcite . lower dimensional d - branes have been constructed as tachyonic lump configurations on bosonic d25-brane @xcite . support for sen s conjecture that lower dimensional d - branes can be identified with tachyonic lump solution of string field theory on bosonic d25-brane also has come from the noncommutative limit of the effective field theory @xcite . various toy models of tachyon dynamics have been useful tool for understanding the realization of sen s conjectures @xcite . despite the success of cubic sft in leading to very good agreement with the expected results , it is still not clear why the calculations in the level - truncated string field theory converge so rapidly to the correct answer for quantities like vacuum energy . it is also not clear how to study the nonperturbative vacuum using this approach . an alternative method has been suggested in @xcite which says that renormalization group ( rg ) analysis of worldsheet theory in first quantized approach can be used to show that the mass of the tachyon lump on a dp - brane is equal to that of a d(p1)-brane . this leads to the idea that boundary string field theory ( sft ) as was originally proposed by witten and shatashvili @xcite may efficiently describe open string tachyon condensation on d - branes in bosonic string theory @xcite ( also see @xcite . it has been pointed out in @xcite that boundary sft can provide an exact verification of sen s conjectures . based on @xcite , one can compute the action exactly taking a simplest tachyon profile as boundary operator of ghost number zero which is quadratic in the space - time coordinate . one can also describe the lumps corresponding to the lower dimensional d - branes and calculate their tension that agrees with the expected result exactly . one strong point of the results of @xcite using level truncation scheme in cubic sft is that it gives a definite picture of the tachyon profile as superposition of @xmath2 for different @xmath3 with definite coefficients producing soliton of finite width . on the other hand the boundary sft analysis of @xcite does not say how the higher tachyon harmonics get mixed with the cosines of different @xmath3 to produce finite size soliton profile . the reason for this is that the mass parameter flows to infinity in the ir in their particular choice of coordinates starting with the simple choice of the tachyon profile initially . this is because the rg equations in that particular choice of coordinates become linear in coupling constants . since the width of the soliton is given by inverse of the mass parameter which flows to infinity in the exact description , the width is zero . also it is difficult to see in this setup how the theory at ir fixed point can describe configurations of more than one d - brane . we should note that although the theory flows to infinity in the ir , the zamolodchikov metric on the space of worldsheet theories measures the distance between the uv and ir fixed point to be finite . in this paper we will try to address these issues in the worldsheet approach by choosing the initial tachyon profile on a circle on bosonic d25-brane world - volume . the basic setup is similar to @xcite . the choice of boundary perturbation , as we will discuss in the next section , is motivated from the analysis of @xcite . in our choice of coordinates in the space of worldsheet field theories the rg analysis provides the boundary conformal field theory to flow to a nearby ir fixed point . we will consider only the first three tachyon modes . the values they flow to after rg flow appears to be in good agreement with the values computed in @xcite of tachyon modes of the string field at the stationary point of the potential . the plan of the paper is the following . in section 2 we briefly review the worldsheet rg scheme in the context of boundary sft . we comment on the boundary entropy that measures the corresponding d - brane tension describing the boundary cft . we highlight the basic setup of @xcite that leads to a particular choice of the tachyon profile . in section 3 we perform the rg analysis in detail choosing a particular ansatz for the green s function of fast moving modes of the scalar field . the rg equations are obtained up to third order in coupling constants . the easy but tedious parts of the calculations are given in the appendix . in section 4 we plot the lump profile that appears from the rg analysis of the previous section . following the method of affleck and ludwig @xcite we calculate the boundary entropy in the leading order . our result satisfies the @xmath4-theorem of @xcite . the boundary entropy is calculated to an accuracy of about @xmath0 of the exact result . in section 5 we analyse the multicritical behaviour of the potential in the ir and argue that the theory in the ir is that of a configuration of two d24-branes . we make an analogy with the kondo problem and argue that the process of the formation of the lump due to tachyon condensation corresponds to the underscreened kondo effect . exact screening occurs when the theory on the brane rolls down to the nonperturbative closed string vacuum . overscreening , on the other hand leads to a picture similar to dielectric effect . we comment on @xmath1 symmetry restoration . section 6 contains discussions on further related issues that are beyond the scope of the paper . if the spectrum of a point in the moduli space has relevant operators in the ir , the point is said to be unstable . the unstable point then might be discarded from the moduli space . in other words , this results in the appearance of unstable directions in the effective potential . ir instability indicates that we are in a _ false _ vacuum . the obvious question will be which point ( or vacuum ) will replace this unstable point , or in other words , how to resolve the ir instability . often regions in moduli space contain d - brane configurations related by t - duality . the above issue can be addressed in these sectors by adding some ir relevant boundary perturbations . one important feature of this boundary deformation is that the bulk theory always remain conformal . flows caused by a relevant boundary operator appear as open string tachyon condensation . flowing to ir on the worldsheet is equivalent to approaching a classical solution of spacetime theory . as a result of the flow , at some points in moduli space , boundary conditions are changed from neumann to dirichlet . the reverse process indicates nonunitarity . the direction of the flow is determined by _ boundary entropy _ defined by @xcite g_a = 0|a , the disk partition function of the boundary state @xmath5 associated to the perturbed theory . the phases of @xmath6 and @xmath5 can be chosen such that the above quantity is real and positive for any boundary state . it is shown in @xcite in first order in conformal perturbation theory that boundary entropy , @xmath4 decreases along rg flows , suggesting the so called @xmath4-_theorem _ similar to zamolodchikov s @xmath7-theorem @xcite . in this context , the case of sine - gordon boundary perturbation with single frequency is studied in @xcite . in fact @xmath4 measures the tension of the d - brane that describes boundary conformal field theory at the corresponding fixed point @xcite ( see also @xcite ) and the @xmath4-theorem implies the minimization of the action in the space of _ all two - dimensioanal worldsheet field theories_. the worldsheet formulation of string field theory is _ manifestly _ background independent depends on the closed string background . ] . in @xcite a gauge invariant background independent spacetime string field theory action is defined as the solution of the following equation : = _ 0 ^ 2_0 ^ 2 _ i()\{q , o( ) } _ , [ seqn ] where @xmath8 is the brst charge and and @xmath9 is the boundary parameter of the disk . the operator @xmath10 has ghost number one : @xmath11 , where @xmath12 is a general boundary perturbation describing the space of boundary perturbations : @xmath13 . the normalization constant @xmath14 is fixed in @xcite by comparing the on - shell three tachyon amplitude computed from the background independent open string field theory with the same computed in chern - simons string field theory : k = t_p , [ norm ] @xmath15 being the corresponding dp - brane tension . the correlation function in the above expression is defined in terms of the perturbed worldsheet action on the disk . the above action is defined up to an additive constant . although the boundary perturbation @xmath12 does not depend on ghosts , the theory with perturbed action is not renormalizable . but in the case of tachyon condensation , it is renormalizable . so boundary string field theory works well for studying tachyon condensation problem . but it is not clear how to define a general off - shell amplitude due to uv divergences on the worldsheet . an alternative definition of s is given by the metric on the space of worldsheet theories @xcite = -^jg_ij , [ s - g ] where @xmath16 is the corresponding beta function which acts like a vector field on the space of worldsheet theories . in @xcite a very important relation between the action @xmath17 and the partition function on the disk is demonstrated up to second order in coupling constant : _ = -^i+z ( ) . [ s - z ] since on - shell the beta function vanishes , the action is same as the partition function . this fixes the additive ambiguity in ( [ seqn ] ) . the above relation implies that all symmetries of the worldsheet partition partition function are also symmetries of the spacetime action . it is further argued that @xcite the spacetime action @xmath17 is nothing but the boundary entropy @xmath4 . although background independence is manifest in the worldsheet formalism , it is lost once we compute @xmath17 or @xmath4 perturbatively . but if the above relation between the spacetime action and the partition function is true in all orders in coupling constant , it is not lost . on the other hand , the chern - simons string field theory is not manifestly background independent . to achieve this one is forced to work in a truncated version of hilbert space of the first quantized theory restricting the string field to a background independent subspace for studying the classical lump solution . in our renormalization group analysis of the problem of formation of the tachyonic lump , we follow the basic setup of @xcite where the @xmath18 coordinate is taken to be on a circle of radius @xmath19 . we take @xmath20 to be the scalar field on the string worldsheet associated with @xmath18 . on a d25-brane @xmath20 satisfies neumann boundary conditions . the conformal field theory associated with the field @xmath20 has central charge , @xmath21 . before going into the rg analysis let us briefly discuss the setup of @xcite . for details on the background independent subspace of the complete fock space see @xcite . a basis of states of this theory is conveniently formed by grouping the states into verma modules . the states contained in the verma module are obtained out of primary state @xmath22 by acting with the associated virasoro generators @xmath23 . linear independence of the states to form the basis is achieved by removing null states from the spectrum . in fact the spectrum is free of null states for @xmath24 and an irrational @xmath19 value . in order to achieve a successful truncation of the hilbert space one has to restrict the primary states of the boundary conformal field theory along @xmath18 to be even under @xmath25 and to be trivial primaries of the conformal field theory of the fields associated to the rest of the coordinates of bosonic string theory . as a result the appropriate primary states are : ( 1 ) the zero momentum primaries that are even under @xmath25 ( also removing the null states ) , and ( 2 ) the vacuum state @xmath26 with @xmath27 . let us recall that an open bosonic string propagating in the tachyon background is described by the following action s = dsdt ^ab_a__b^+_-^ dk t(k ) e^ik , where @xmath28 is the uv cutoff and @xmath29 is the tachyon field with momentum @xmath30 . in the present case where @xmath18 is compact , the momentum is descrete and we are motivated to take the boundary perturbation to be of the form ( respecting @xmath25 symmetry ) : dt t[(t)]=_n=0^_ndt ( ( 0,t ) ) , where @xmath31s are tachyon modes . the zero mode @xmath32 is the identity operator and is always tachyonic . the higher modes may not be tachyonic depending on the radius @xmath19 . in our analysis we only consider the first three tachyon modes ( _ i.e. _ @xmath33 ) . hence the problem is similar to the boundary sine - gordon model with two frequencies , which typically allows to hit a nearby ir fixed point producing a lump profile of finite size . the boundary conformal field theory can be described by a gaussian model with gapless excitation spectrum and the correlation functions of bosonic exponents follow power laws . this behaviour implies that the correlation length is infinite and the system is in its critical phase . under boundary perturbations , usually the correlation functions are affected differently on different scales and the long distance asymptotics get affected the most . certain perturbations may cause only tiny changes in the uv , but changes the ir behaviour profoundly . in the rg picture this is observed as a growth of the coupling constant associated with the perturbation . a slow decay of correlation functions gives rise to divergences in the perturbation series . if the influence of the perturbing operator grows on large scales , the perturbation is _ relevant_. consider the perturbed action s = s_0 + dt o_(t ) where @xmath34 is the action of the system at criticality and @xmath35 is the perturbing field with scaling dimension @xmath36 , @xmath37 . the perturbation with zero conformal spin and scaling dimension @xmath36 is relevant if @xmath38 and _ irrelevant _ if @xmath39 . the case @xmath40 is the _ marginal _ one and its effect on scaling dimensions of correlation functions depends on the sign of the coupling constant @xmath41 . consider the path integral on the disk with a worldsheet action s = s_0 + dt t[(t ) ] [ totalaction ] where @xmath34 is the free field action on the disk describing an open and closed string conformal background . the perturbing boundary field @xmath42 $ ] is a tachyon profile and @xmath20 is the scalar field along the string worldsheet associated with the compactified coordinate @xmath18 . the above action describes a renormalization group flow from a theory where all 26 bosonic directions are neumann describing a d25-brane to the theory where @xmath18 direction is dirichlet describing a d24-brane . instead of using the callan - symanzik formalism we follow the wilsonian renormalization scheme where we put the theory on a lattice . we assume that the fourier transform of the field , @xmath43 , is defined in the brillouin zone and choose a cut - off , @xmath44 . the aim is to start moving towards larger distances ( or lower energies ) by integrating out the fields with shorter and shorter wavelengths . the procedure is based on the decomposition of the boundary field with a cutoff into a slow moving ( long - wavelength ) and a fast moving ( short - moving ) component , @xmath45 , where we have split the brillouin zone @xmath44 into a wide region @xmath46 and a narrow slice @xmath47 . the original field is given by _ ( t ) & = & e^it _ ( ) + & = & _ ||< d2 e^it _ s ( ) + _ <|| < d2 e^it _ f ( ) . the next step will be to perform a partial path integration in the partition function over the fast moving part and representing the result in terms of an effective model for the slow moving field . if the model is renormalizable , which is known to be the case for sine - gordon model that we will consider below , the effective action will have the same structure as the original one , but with a new set of coupling constants . this procedure is repeated several times , and after each step the form of the original model is reproduced ( upto irrelevant terms ) . the relations between the bare and the renormalized couplings then lead to renormalization group ( rg ) equations . the gaussian part @xmath34 is additive under the above decomposition . hence , given the cutoff , the partition function is given by z_&= & d_sd_f e^-s_0[_s ] e^-s_0[_f]e^-s_i[_s+_f ] + & = & z_fd_s e^-s_0[_s ] e^-s_i[_s+_f]_f where @xmath48 is a nonsingular contribution of fast moving components to the partition function . the effective action involving the slow moving part of the field is given by s_eff[_s]=s_0[_s]+s_i eff[_s ] where s_i eff[_s ] = -e^-s_i[_s+_f]_f it is clear that the effective action preserves all ir singularities . assuming the coupling to be small , we expand the above effective interaction perturbatively upto cubic order s_i eff[_s ] & = & s_i _ f+1 2(s_i_f^2-s_i^2 _ f ) + & & + ( 1 6s_i^3 - 1 2s_i_f s_i^2 _ f + 1 3s_i_f^3 ) + o(^4 ) [ sieff ] now we consider the effect of switching on first three tachyon harmonics : @xmath49 , and @xmath50 . the scalar perturbation is of _ double sine - gordon _ type and reads symmetry of the coupling @xmath31s in writing down the perturbation which might be more appropriate in order to compare the results with that of @xcite . however we chose perturbation of the type ( [ double - sine - gordon ] ) as this allows us to hit the desired multicritical ir fixed point from the stable direction . however we will invoke the @xmath51 symmetry to show multicriticality in section 5 . the opposite sign in front of the identity operator does not modify the analysis for other operators . the coupling in front of the identity operator appears linearly in the beta function and it does not mix with other couplings . also as we will see in the next section , boundary entropy does not get a contribution from it . ] s_i [ _ ] = _ 0dt * 1 * - _ 1dt _ ( t ) - _ 2dt 2_(t ) . [ double - sine - gordon ] where @xmath52 defines the conformal dimensions of our theory and the scaling dimension is @xmath53 for the first harmonic and @xmath54 for the second harmonic . the tachyon zero mode is the identity operator with zero scaling dimension . rescaling @xmath52 : @xmath55 results in the relation @xmath56 . following @xcite , we take the radius @xmath57 . in this radius the first mode is least relevant and the perturbation by the second mode is least irrelevant , which , after being added to the cutoff theory , should improve the rg result . such a procedure should lead to a good result even when only first few irrelevant terms are included . the effects of highly irrelevant operators are highly damped by their rapid decay . using the above definition of the effective action we perturbatively calculate contributions in each order in coupling constant , @xmath41 . then in order to restore the original cut - off to @xmath58 we rescale the energy @xmath59 and the time @xmath60 so that the effective action is of the same form as the bare one but with a renormalized strength of coupling . now we calculate the expression ( [ sieff ] ) term by term . 0.5 cm : in first order in couplings , it is given by s_i_f & = & _ 0dt _ f - _ 1dt _ f + & & - _ 2dt 2_f . [ order1double ] the expression for correlation function of bosonic exponents reads _ n e^i_n(t_n)=e^-_m > n _ m_n g(t_m , t_n)e^-1 2_m _ n^2 g(t_m , t_m ) . [ exp - cor ] the terms containing green s functions of coinciding arguments are singular in the continuous limit . but in our regularized theory they are finite . the green s function has the following well known form g(t_m , t_n ) = 1 4 ln(r^2 ) , [ gf ] where @xmath61 and @xmath28 are ir and uv cut - off respectively . substituting into ( [ exp - cor ] ) we get the result for the correlation function of bosonic exponents : _ n e^i_n ( t_n)= _ m > n ( 1+(t_m - t_n)^2 a^2)^_m_n 4 ( r a)^-(_n_n)^2 4 . [ exp - cor1 ] using the above formulae we obtain e^i_f(t)_f = e^-^2 2_f(0)^2_f = e^-^2 2g_f(0,0 ) , where -^2 2g(0,0 ) = -^2 2_0^df ( ) = -^2 4 ln , [ gengf ] and -^2 2g_f(0,0 ) = -^2 2_-d^df ( ) = di ( ) = -^2 4(d ) = -^2 4dl . [ fastgf ] hence ( [ order1double ] ) turns out to be s_i_f & = & _ 0 * 1 * -_1(1-dl ) _ s(t ) + & & - _ 2(1-dl ) 2_s(t ) + o(dl^2 ) , [ order1doublefinal ] where @xmath62 are small dimensionless couplings . 0.5 cm : 0.5 cm we now turn to the quadratic contribution to ( [ sieff ] ) . imposing translational invariance it can be written as & & 1 2(s_i_f^2-s_i^2_f ) + & = & dt_1 dt_2 \ { e^-^2 g_f(0,0 ) ( 1-e^-^2 g_f(t_2-t_2 ) ) + & & + e^-^2 g_f(0,0 ) ( 1-e^^2 g_f(t_2-t_2 ) ) } + & & + dt_1 dt_2 \ { e^-4 ^ 2 g_f(0,0 ) ( 1-e^-4 ^ 2 g_f(t_2-t_2 ) ) 2 + & & + e^-4 ^ 2 g_f(0,0 ) ( 1-e^4 ^ 2 g_f(t_2-t_2 ) ) 2 } + & & + e^-dl dt_1dt_2 \{(1-e^-2 ^ 2g_f(t_1-t_2 ) ) + & & + \{(1-e^2 ^ 2g_f(t_1-t_2 ) ) } . [ order2double1 ] to evaluate the correlation functions of the bosonic vertices we have used ( [ exp - cor ] ) . to evaluate the green s function for fast moving modes we use the following scheme . instead of considering just the momentum shell for fast moving modes , if we consider all momenta upto cutoff @xmath58 then using ( [ exp - cor1 ] ) we get e^i(t_1 ) e^i(t_2)= ( 1+(t_1-t_2)^2 a^2)^^2 4 ^ -^2 , which , like ( [ gengf ] ) , leads to -^2 g(0,0)-^2 g(t_1-t_2 ) = ^2 4 . hence the analogous treatment for fast moving modes follows by performing the integration in the narrow slice only . using the expression for @xmath63 given by ( [ fastgf ] ) we arrive at the following useful expression for fast moving components -^2 g_f(t_1-t_2 ) -^2 2dl(ln||+1)+o(dl^2 ) , [ fastgf1 ] where we have assumed that @xmath64 . it is clear that g_f(t_1-t_2)=f(r ) dl+o(dl^2 ) , where @xmath65 . if we adopt a sharp momentum cut - off prescription , @xmath66 will be bessel function of order zero , @xmath67 , which has a long oscillating tail and does not fall off rapidly on increasing its argument . however , as was shown in @xcite , in a smooth cut - off procedure @xmath66 is truly short - ranged , essentially nonzero at @xmath68 . this can be seen in ( [ order2double1 ] ) , the functions like @xmath69 are also short - ranged . this allows us to introduce the center - of - mass coordinate @xmath70 and relative coordinate @xmath71 and expand the cosines of ( [ order2double1 ] ) in @xmath72 . the detail calculation is shown in the appendix . here we only mention some of the necessary facts . for example , consider the cosine @xmath73 \approx 1-{\beta^2r^2 \over 2}(\partial_{\tilde r}\phi_{s\lambda'}(\tilde r))^2 $ ] , where the first term contributes to renormalization of the free energy . in our case that generates the rg contribution to identity operator . on the other hand , the second ( gradient)@xmath74 term is an irrelevant term with a factor proportional to the uv cut - off @xmath28 in front of the renormalized coupling . here we see a striking difference between bulk and boundary rg flows , where in the latter case the gradient term is responsible for renormalization of the constant @xmath52 . collecting the @xmath75 , @xmath76 , and @xmath77 contributions from the appendix , we arrive at the following complete second order expression & & ( s_i_f^2-s_i^2_f ) + & = & _ 1 ^ 2dl 2_s ( t ) -_1 ^ 2dl * 1 * + & & + _ 2 ^ 2dl 4_s ( t ) -_2 ^ 2dl * 1 * + & & + 2 ^ 2dl ( 3_s(r ) -_s(r ) ) . [ order2doublefinal ] 0.5 cm : 0.5 cm the calculation of the cubic contribution to ( [ sieff ] ) is similar and the details are given in the appendix . here we give the result only : & & 1 6s_i^3_f-1 2s_i_fs_i^2_f + 1 3s_i_f^3 + & = & _ 1 ^ 3()dl 3_s ( t ) + _ 1 ^ 3 ( ) dl _ s ( t ) + & & + _ 2 ^ 3()dl 6_s ( t ) + _ 2 ^ 3 ( ) dl 2_s ( t ) . [ order3doublefinal ] collecting all the results up to third order from ( [ order1doublefinal ] ) , ( [ order2doublefinal ] ) and ( [ order3doublefinal ] ) we express the effective boundary action as s_i eff[_s ] & = & _ 0 * 1 * -_1(1-dl ) _ s(t ) -_2(1-dl ) 2_s(t ) + & & + _ 1 ^ 2dl 2_s ( t ) -_1 ^ 2dl * 1 * + & & + _ 2 ^ 2dl 4_s ( t ) -_2 ^ 2dl * 1 * + & & + 2 ^ 2dl 3_s(r ) -2 ^ 2dl _ s(r ) + & & _ 1 ^ 3()dl 3_s ( t ) + _ 1 ^ 3 ( ) dl _ s ( t ) + & & + _ 2 ^ 3()dl 6_s ( t ) + _ 2 ^ 3 ( ) dl 2_s ( t ) . [ sieffdouble(semifinal ) ] in order to restore the original cut - off to @xmath58 we rescale the energy @xmath59 . in order to keep the product @xmath78 intact , we have to rescale time in the opposite way , @xmath60 . the effective action is of the same form as the bare one but with a renormalized strength of coupling . hence neglecting the @xmath79 terms , s_i eff [ _ ] & = & _ 0(1+dl ) * 1 * -_1(1+(1-)dl ) _ s(t ) + & & -_2(1+(1-)dl ) 2_s(t ) + & & + _ 1 ^ 2dl 2_s ( t ) -_1 ^ 2dl * 1 * + & & + _ 2 ^ 2dl 4_s ( t ) -_2 ^ 2dl * 1 * + & & + 2 ^ 2dl 3_s(r ) -2 ^ 2dl _ s(r ) + & & + _ 1 ^ 3()dl 3_s ( t ) + _ 1 ^ 3 ( ) dl _ s ( t ) + & & + _ 2 ^ 3()dl 6_s ( t ) + _ 2 ^ 3 ( ) dl 2_s ( t ) . + & & [ sieffdouble(final ) ] note that although initially we considered perturbation with tachyonic zero , first and second modes , the non - linear rg flow equations force the coefficients of various other boundary fields with higher harmonics to evolve . we see from above expression that the third and fourth harmonics evolve at second order and the third and sixth harmonics evolve at third order . also notice that there is no mixing between @xmath80 and @xmath50 at third order in the coupling . the beta functions can be extracted from the above expression and are given by _ 0 & = & = _ 0 -_1 ^ 2-_2 ^ 2 , + _ 1 & = & = -(1-)_1 -_1_2 + _ 1 ^ 3 , + _ 2 & = & = -(1-)_2 + _ 1 ^ 2 + _ 2 ^ 3 . [ betafn2 ] now we take @xmath57 , where the perturbation with @xmath80 and @xmath50 becomes least relevant and irrelevant respectively . perturbation with the identity operator ( associated with @xmath32 ) in the rg picture just adds a constant to the action . typically the coefficient of the least relevant operator grows at the fastest rate at the beginning , and drives the system towards the fixed point . the final shape of the soliton is determined by where this fixed point is . rescaling of @xmath81 in ( [ betafn ] ) results in _ 0 & = & = _ 0 -_1 ^ 2-_2 ^ 2 , + _ 1 & = & = -_1 -_1_2 + _ 1 ^ 3 , + _ 2 & = & = _ 2 + _ 1 ^ 2 + _ 2 ^ 3 . [ betafn1 ] typically single a sine - gordon boundary perturbation does nt lead to a nearby fixed point and the theory typically flows to infinity . typically @xmath41 flows all the way from 0 to @xmath82 under renormalization . the boundary conditions look like neumann at very high energy ( uv ) but like dirichlet at low energy ( ir ) . the field @xmath20 satisfy neumann boundary conditions close to the boundary , but feels dirichlet boundary conditions instead far from it . but as in the next section we will see that sine - gordon model with two frequencies we considered above has a nearby fixed point . the situation is very analogous to string field theory . suppose we are trying to construct the lump solution on a circle of radius @xmath19 . in this case we need to start with an initial tachyon field for which the coefficient of @xmath83 is non - zero , and then use the equations of motion of string field theory iteratively to improve the solution . this generates all higher harmonics as well as the tachyon zero momentum mode as we saw in our rg analysis as well . but if from the beginning we introduce the tachyon zero momentum mode in the initial configuration , then the iterative process drives the solution towards the vacuum solution where the tachyon is constant instead of the one lump solution . in the rg picture perturbations with the identity operator are generally regarded as uninteresting , as they just add a constant to the action . also , in the peturbative definition via correlation functions , the zero mode has no effect . in this section we will calculate the boundary entropy perturbatively in leading order and compare the result with its exact value . we follow the method of @xcite . let us recall the rg equations ( [ betafn2 ] ) obtained in the last section ( up to second order in coupling constants ) _ 0 & = & = _ 0 -2(1-y_1)_1 ^ 2 - 8(1-y_1)_2 ^ 2 , + _ 1 & = & = -y_1_1 -8(1-y_1)_1_2 , + _ 2 & = & = -y_2_2 + 2(1-y_1)_1 ^ 2 , [ betafn ] where @xmath84 is the scaling dimension of the corresponding harmonic . the above rg equations satisfies right @xmath85-expansion behaviour according to @xcite . the first step will be to solve these equations for the bare couplings , @xmath86 , @xmath87 , and @xmath88 , as functions of renormalized couplings at the scale set by @xmath61 , @xmath89 , @xmath90 , and @xmath91 . the pfaffian differential equation obtained from the above set of equations is ( d_0+d_2 ) + [ _ 0 - 8(1-y_1)_2 ^ 2-(4y_1 - 3)_2]d_1 = 0 , [ pfaffian ] which is needed in order to satisfy the integrability condition given by & & [ y_1_1 + 8(1-y_1)_1_2][24(1-y_1 ) _ 2 + 5y_1 - 3]+8(1-y_1)_1 [ _ 0 - 8(1-y_1)_2 ^ 2-(4y_1 - 3 ) _ 2 ] + & & + [ y_1_1 + 8(1-y_1)_1_2][1-y_1 - 8(1-y_1 ) _ 2 ] = 0 . [ integrability ] for @xmath92 , we have the following relation between @xmath86 and @xmath88 64(1-y_1)^2_2 ^ 2 + 8(1-y_1)(1 + 2y_1)_2 + 8(1-y_1 ) _ 0 - 2y_1(1 - 2y_1)=0 . [ reln1 ] the branch containing the real solution of @xmath93 satisfies the following , 8(1-y_1)_0 + 2y_1(2y_1 - 1 ) ( 2y_1 + 1)^2/4 , which implies @xmath94 for @xmath57 , concistent with our results for the desired ir fixed point discussed below . combining @xmath95 and @xmath96 in ( [ betafn ] ) into ( d_0+d_2)/[_0 - 8(1-y_1 ) _ 2 ^ 2-(4y_1 - 3)_2 ] = dl , and using the relation ( [ reln1 ] ) , we get 8(1-y_1)d_2/[8(1-y_1)_2 + 2y_1 - 1]=dl , for @xmath97 . integrating the above expression from @xmath28 to @xmath61 , we obtain the following expression for the bare coupling @xmath88 = -_2^ * , [ bare2 ] where @xmath98 and @xmath99 is the scaling dimension of the second tachyon harmonic . for @xmath57 , the perturbation with the second harmonic is least irrelevant and is added to improve the shape of the profile of the lump at ir fixed point . being irrelavant the perturbing operator with @xmath88 decays out . this can be seen by considering the perturbation expansion of the two - point correlation function of bosonic exponents . the integral appearing in the first nonvanishing correction to this correlation function converges at large distances for an irrelevant operator . this implies that the perturbation expansion does not contain ir singularities ; so if the bare coupling constant is small , its effect will remain small and will not be amplified in the process of renormalization . in the limit the renormalization scale , @xmath100 , _ 2 = _ 2(r ) - ( -1 ) ( ) _ 2^ * -0.125 , which is very close to the result of @xcite for the second harmonic at the stable minimum of the tachyon potential . on the other hand , the other two operators which are relevant for @xmath57 evolve to the values : @xmath101 , which are also very close to the results obtained by the level truncation technique @xcite . hence the lump profile is given by t(x_25)=0.25 - 0.35(x_25 ) -0.125(x_25 ) as a function of @xmath18 . the profile is shown in figure 1 . the profile has finite size in contrast to the result of @xcite . before returning to the calculation of boundary entropy , notice that in the rg equations ( [ betafn ] ) in the limit @xmath102 , the linear terms in @xmath103 and @xmath96 agree . the reason for these to disagree with @xmath95 is that we chose a positive sign in front of @xmath32 in the beginning . the rg equations up to linear order are @xmath104 , where the sign in front of the universal linear term depends on the sign of perturbation . rg analysis with the identity operator is trivial and it does not mix with other operators . also as we will discuss soon its contribution goes to ground state energy correction only , not to boundary entropy . next we calculate the bare @xmath86 and @xmath87 in terms of the renormalized couplings . in order to obtain the expression for bare coupling , @xmath86 in terms of the renormalized couplings we use ( [ reln1 ] ) setting the scale at uv cutoff : _ 0 ( a ) = - . inserting ( [ bare2 ] ) for the bare coupling , @xmath88 , we get the following expression for @xmath86 = - . [ bare0 ] inserting the above expression for bare coupling , @xmath86 into the pfaffian equation ( [ pfaffian ] ) we get = - , which , assuming @xmath97 , simplifies to ( ) d[8(1-y_1)_2 ] = - . integrating both sides we obtain 8(1-y_1)_2+(1-y_1 ) ln[8(1-y_1)_2 + 2y_1 - 1 ] = -ln _ 1+ln c , [ indefinite ] where the integration constant determines the correct trajectory that passes through uv and desired ir fixed points . one might wonder since many different theories flow to the same fixed point , that we can not write the bare couplings in terms of renormalized couplings . in fact , here as we are starting with the correct set of rg equations which inherently have the right uv fixed point as a trivial solution so over an infinitesimal segment from the uv fixed point we are automatically on the right trajectory . what we need to worry about is that as we integrate those equations we do nt deviate from the right trajectory and miss the ir fixed point . we reach the desired fixed point by determining the correct value of the integration constant . to determine the constant that allows us to reach the desired _ nearby _ fixed point as the end point of the flow we substitute the couplings with their fixed point values _ 1^*=- , _ 2^*=- , into ( [ indefinite ] ) resulting in the following expression for the bare coupling , @xmath87 & = & e^-(1-y_1)()^1-y_1 , [ bare1 ] where we have used ( [ bare2 ] ) . having solved the renormalization group equations for the bare couplings as functions of renormalized couplings , given by ( [ bare0 ] ) , ( [ bare1 ] ) , and ( [ bare2 ] ) we turn to the calculation for boundary entropy which measures the tension of the corresponding d - brane and test the @xmath4-_conjecture _ , which in turn is related to the minimisation of the action in the space of open string fields . the boundary has its own free energy proportional to the size of the system which diverges linearly with scale @xmath105 in thermodynamic limit . the boundary free energy gets another contribution independent of scale which counts the boundary degrees of freedom , measured by @xmath106 , f_bl =- ln z = f_bl - ln g. we first perturbatively expand the partition function @xmath107 to @xmath108 . we arrive at a uv expansion of the form which schematically looks like ln z = _ n c_n(_ir^y_i)^n = f_b^ + ln g+^-ve , where @xmath109 is the scaling dimension . we discard terms linear in negative powers of scale and nonuniversal uv divergent terms which are linear in scale as they correspond to ground state energy corrections . the remaining terms have weak dependence on the scale set by @xmath61 , which acts as an ir cut - off , as we can absorb them approximately in terms of the renormalized coupling @xmath110 using the relations ( [ bare0 ] ) , ( [ bare1 ] ) , and ( [ bare2 ] ) obtained by solving simultaneous @xmath52-function equations . thus in the @xmath100 limit ( when @xmath111 ) , these terms give the contribution to the boundary entropy . note that the weak ir cut - off dependence is consistent with the renormalization group . to cubic order in coupling the partition function is given by & & 1 + dt_1dt_2 t _ j(t_2 ) + & & + dt_1dt_2dt_3 t _ i(t_1 ) _ j(t_2 ) _ k(t_3 ) . since @xmath112 , this vanishes in the thermodynamic limit , @xmath113 . here @xmath114 is the partition function at uv fixed point . any @xmath3-point correlation function of sine - gordon perturbation , the electro - nonneutral ( @xmath115 in ( [ exp - cor1 ] ) ) part has an overall factor of @xmath116 that can not be compensated using definition of renormalized coupling @xmath110 ; therefore in above perturbative expansion contributions come from electro - neutral parts only such as @xmath75 , @xmath76 , and @xmath117 . clearly there is no contribution from the identity operator of any order as its contribution can be considered to be going to ground state energy correction . the perturbing operator has two point function given by _ i(t_2 ) = ( ) ^2(1-y_i ) . so the quadratic contribution to @xmath118 turns out to be ( considering half - cylinder geometry ) z_2 & = & _ i=1,2 a^-2y_i _ i^2 + & = & _ i=1,2 a^-2y_i _ -r/2^r/2 , [ z2a ] where @xmath119 is the relative coordinate and @xmath120 . the above integration is regularized by the cut - off @xmath121 . mapping the circle to infinite line : @xmath122 the above integration becomes z_2 = _ i=1,2 _ i^2()^2y_i _ |u|<a / r . [ z2b ] integration by parts results in z_2 & = & _ i=1,2 _ i^2()^2y_i 2 + & = & _ i=1,2 _ i^2()^2y_i 2 , [ z2c ] where @xmath123 is the euler beta function . the first term is linear in @xmath61 and does not contribute to boundary entropy . we will formally perform the computation as an expansion in @xmath124 supposing @xmath124 to be small and at the end we will set @xmath125 corresponding to @xmath57 . it is not _ a priori _ obvious that such @xmath124 expansion will converge for finite value of @xmath124 . however , as we will see , it does quite well in our case giving nice agreement with exact value of the ratio @xmath126 . the situation is similar to computation of critical exponents in three dimensions where @xmath85-expansion for @xmath127 dimensions converges for @xmath128 and gives nice agreement with the experimental data . we note that we can reach nearby fixed point at the end of the rg flow with @xmath129 indicating that @xmath124 is small enough . now in the small @xmath124 limit @xmath130 becomes z_2 -^2 , [ z2final ] where we have dropped the @xmath131 part which vanishes in the @xmath100 limit as it has an overall factor of @xmath132 with @xmath133 negative as can be seen by substituting ( [ bare2 ] ) in ( [ z2c ] ) . the cubic part is given by z_3 = dt_1dt_2dt_3e^i(t_1)e^i(t_2 ) e^-2i(t_3)[z3a ] which on half - cylinder turns out to be z_3 = a^-2y_1a^-y_2d_1d_2d_3 . [ z3b ] now introducing the relative coordinates @xmath134 and @xmath135 and center - of - mass coordinate @xmath136 the above integral simplifies to z_3 & = & a^-2y_1a^-y_2r_|u_i|>a / r du_1 du_2 ( ) ^2 + & & ( ) ^2(1-y_1 ) ( ) ^-2(1-y_2 ) + & & | ( ) /|^2(1-y_1 ) , [ z3c ] where @xmath137 with a regularization @xmath138 , @xmath139 . the above expression can be written in a more convenient form given by z_3 = ^2_|u_i|>a / r du_1 du_2 . [ z3d ] let us first concentrate on terms of @xmath140 $ ] and the ground state energy contribution from terms of @xmath141 . to achieve that we make a change of variables : @xmath142 . the above integral becomes z_3 = ^2_|u_1|>u_0(v)du_1dv . [ z3e ] where @xmath143 is the new cut - off . integration by parts with respect to @xmath144 gives z_3 & = & ^2_-^dv + & & . [ z3f ] from the surface term we will get contribution of @xmath145 $ ] which has no effect on boundary entropy . the rest is uv finite and we can remove the cut - off . however there will be a contribution of @xmath146 $ ] coming from @xmath147 $ ] term in the denominator . to extract this contribution we perform the following calculation . we first introduce step functions into the integral ( [ z3d ] ) i ( ) = _ -^du_1du_2 ( u_1 ^ 2-^2)(u_2 ^ 2-^2 ) , where @xmath148 is the cut - off . it is convenient to differentiate the integral with respect to @xmath85 : _ -^ ( u_1 ^ 2-^2 ) . the integral is identical to ( [ z2b ] ) with the same cut - off . so using previous result obtained for @xmath130 we get = 2[^-(1 - 2y_1)-y_1 ] , that gives i ( ) = ( ) ^4 - 6y_1 -()^-y_2 + [ i ] the second part gives the desired @xmath146 $ ] behaviour that has weak cut - off dependence . but the first part is of no interest to us since it is the ground state energy contribution from @xmath149 . the constant part comes from evaluating the integral ( [ z3f ] ) throwing away the surface term . writing the integral in terms of old variables @xmath150 we get & & - ^2 + & & _ -^ ( + ) + & & = - ^2_-^ ( ) . + & & we notice that in small @xmath124 limit , while performing the @xmath151 integration , the @xmath124 factor in front is cancelled by a divergence from @xmath152 : 2_a / r^ - ( ) ^4y_1 - 3 . hence in small @xmath124 limit , the constant part of ( [ i ] ) becomes & & - ^2()^4y_1 - 3_-^ ( ) + & & - ^2()^-y_2 . so ignoring higher orders in @xmath124 the final expression for @xmath118 contributing to boundary entropy is given by = 1-y_1 ^ 2 -^2()^-y_2 . having already obtained the expression for the bare couplings in terms of the renormalized couplings as given by ( [ bare2 ] ) and ( [ bare1 ] ) we can rewrite the above result in terms of renormalized couplings only . as @xmath100 , @xmath153 . hence the desired ratio between ground state entropy at ir and uv fixed points turns out to be ( in the leading order in @xmath124 ) r_p = _ r 1 - 0.50088964 y_1 ^ 2 . notice that the change in @xmath4 is negative , implying decrease of @xmath4 under flow between uv to ir point . also the ratio becomes unity for exactly marginal case , _ i.e. _ where @xmath154 , giving a line of fixed points . on the other hand the exact result is given by @xcite r_e = . for @xmath155 , perturbative result is @xmath156 compared to the exact result , @xmath157 ; so our result is within @xmath158 . on the other hand for @xmath159 , _ i.e. _ when @xmath124 is very small and the perturbation by the first tachyon harmonic is nearly marginal , the perturbative result is @xmath160 compared to the exact result , @xmath161 ; the perturbative result is now obtained to an accuracy of @xmath0 of the exact result . in the effective landau - ginzburg description of two dimensional conformal field theory , = d^2x ( ( ) ^2+v ( ) ) , [ lg ] @xmath20 being the order parameter for some physical system , the extrema of the general polynomial interaction correspond to various critical phases of the system . many systems possess a @xmath25 symmetry with an even polynomial interaction @xmath163 . for a polynomial @xmath164 of degree @xmath165 , this ensures existence of @xmath166 minima separated by @xmath167 maxima . several critical phases can coexist if the corresponding extrema coincide . hence the most critical potential is a monomial in @xmath20 and the @xmath166 critical behaviour of the theory is given by the interaction : _ int = gd^2x ^2(m-1 ) . [ mono ] by comparing the structure of the operator algebra of the above bulk critical theory with that of the unitary diagonal minimal model @xmath168 , characterized by central charge @xmath169 for @xmath170 zamolodchikov @xcite has shown that each @xmath166 multicritical behaviour of the theory ( [ lg ] ) is nothing but a minimal model , @xmath168 . generalizing this concept to boundary conformal field theory we consider the boundary potential of the form v ( ) = _ k g_k ^2k(0 ) . the bulk theory is still the @xmath21 ( _ i.e. _ @xmath171 ) minimal model throughout the flow . near the uv fixed point , as we turn on the boundary interaction ( which can be considered as even polynomial interaction of order infinity and hence an indication of underlying infinite number of critical phases of the system ) the system flows to the ir near which the system has finite multicritical behaviour . the strength of multicriticality ( _ i.e. _ how many critical phases can coexist ) depends on number of couplings involved , _ i.e. _ on dimensionality of the space of coupling constants . in other words , expanding the sine - gordon polynomial about @xmath172 near the ir fixed point , the potential has the following form : v ( ) = ( _ n _ n^ * ) -(_n _ n^*)(0)^2 + ( _ n _ n^*)(0)^4- ( -1)^k_k g_k^*(0)^2k . now using the results from previous section , @xmath173 , so one can consider @xmath174 for a large number of couplings turned on . for the perturbation with the first three tachyon harmonics ( [ double - sine - gordon ] ) , _ i.e. _ @xmath175 , we observe that for @xmath176 , only @xmath177 , and all other @xmath178 indicating @xmath179 and hence the existence of two critical phases of the system at the ir fixed point . also for @xmath19 close to one ( _ i.e. _ the self - dual radius ) , @xmath180 , @xmath181 showing the two phases again . as we turn on more and more couplings , we will see that lower order coefficients of @xmath164 become zero , but some higher order coefficient becomes nonzero producing a shift in the degree of the polynomial effective interaction indicating the presence of more and more critical phases . for @xmath182 the effective interaction is basically a monomial of very large order . we can expect that by turning on all possible couplings ( _ i.e. _ infinite number of tachyon modes ) we can probe the @xmath82-multicritical behaviour of the system . note that the values of coupling constants @xmath183 are meaningful only in the context of a particular renormalization scheme and when the composite fields @xmath184 are defined . however the multicritical behaviour observed is rg scheme independent @xcite . for the effective polynomial interaction @xmath185 , the @xmath186-critical behaviour ( _ i.e. _ presence of @xmath186 degenerate minima ) of the potential is confined to hypersurfaces @xmath187 , @xmath188 of codimension @xmath189 , _ i.e. _ of dimension @xmath190 . the @xmath191 dimensional boundary @xmath192 of this hypersurface @xmath187 is critical . whereas the form of the hypersurfaces @xmath187 and @xmath192 essentially depends on the regularization scheme of the theory , the @xmath186-critical behaviour on the hypersurface @xmath192 is universal and depends only on @xmath186 . for the sine - gordon potential ( essentially an infinite degree polynomial interaction ) , @xmath193-critical behaviours are possible and our observation is that by turning on full set of coupling constants we can fully explore the @xmath82-critical behaviour at ir . in string theory language , the @xmath186-critical behaviour in the ir is nothing but a free @xmath21 boundary conformal field theory of @xmath186-coalescing d24-branes with @xmath194 chan - paton factor . note that in order to probe the @xmath82-critical behaviour ( in other words @xmath162 symmetry of the nonperturbative bosonic vacuum reached asymptotically from the core of the d24-brane ) we need to turn on all tachyonic modes even though higher modes , being highly irrelevant , have no significant effect in perturbative rg analysis . when we perturb by the zeroth mode only ( where @xmath195 ) we end up with the closed string vacuum with no d - brane ( _ i.e. _ @xmath196 ) . at this point we can draw an interesting analogy from kondo physics . the kondo model describes the interaction between @xmath30-degenerate bands of spin-@xmath197 conduction electrons and a quantum impurity of arbitrary size @xmath198 placed at one boundary , say at origin , which essentially makes the system nontranslationally invariant . this type of problem is similar to the open string theory in the sense that boundary spin is like a dynamic degrees of freedom or chan - paton factor . the ir ( or low - temperature ) behaviour is quite different depending on the relative size of @xmath199 and @xmath30 . for the _ underscreened case _ ( _ i.e. _ @xmath200 ) the rg flow leads to ir fixed point with fermi liquid behaviour . in the course of rg flow the boundary spin fuses with internal spin of the system and the electron channel screens or swallows up a part of the impurity spin giving rise to a similar current algebra as that of the uv fixed point with a shifted kac - moody current , _ n=_n+ , leading to rearrangement in the conformal towers of the theory . , the ir fixed point is given by fusion with spin-@xmath201 priamry . the fusion rules are @xcite @xmath202 . each conformal tower is mapped into a unique conformal tower giving rise to free fermion spectrum with a @xmath203 phase shift . whereas ir fixed point in overscreened case is given by fusion with spin - s primary . ] the fact that the ir fixed point for the underscreened case is stable can be seen from the interaction between the partially screened spin and the electrons on the neighbouring lattice sites , which is ferromagnetic and hence irrelevant . the strong coupling fixed point is much the same as the uv or zero coupling fixed point . only the size of the impurity spin is reduced and there is a change in boundary condition on the otherwise free fermions ( corresponding to a @xmath203 phase shift ) . this is precisely what happens in the present context of tachyon condensation which leads to a change of boundary condition from neumann to dirichlet . the leftover impurity spin @xmath204 at ir decouples from the internal symmetry group and is similar to the @xmath205 chan - paton factor of @xmath30 d24-branes at ir . for _ exact screening _ , @xmath206 , the internal spin fully swallows up the boundary spin giving rise to a translationally invariant system which is analogous to translationally invariant nonperturbative closed string vacuum with no d - brane . for the _ overscreened _ case ( _ i.e. _ @xmath207 ) , the ir fixed point is very nontrivial and is determined by fusion with the spin-@xmath198 primary . the theory arrives at non - fermi liquid fixed point in the ir which describes completely different physics . the strong coupling ir fixed point ground state has an overscreened spin of size @xmath208 . the induced interaction is antiferromagnetic and hence unstable . the existence of such nontrivial fixed point can be proved in the large-@xmath30 limit ( keeping @xmath198 fixed ) . the ground state can not be described by a simple physical picture . in @xcite the overscreened case is described based on hamiltonian non - abelian bosonization . the idea is to represent the @xmath209 species of electrons in terms of three independent bosonic fields : a free scalar carrying @xmath210 charge , a @xmath211 wzw non - linear @xmath212-model field carring @xmath213 spin , and a @xmath214 wzw field carring @xmath215 flavour degrees of freedom . the kondo interaction involves only the spin current . the degrees of freedom at the ir fixed point are described by an @xmath216 kac - moody invariant cft . both boundary scaling dimensions and fermi - liquid bulk scaling dimensions are described by a @xmath217 kac - moody boundary cft . there are restrictions on the combinations of charge , spin , flavour degrees of freedom . unlike the underscreened case , here fermion exponents are not recovered and are generally not half - integer . they come from more general combinations of three types of bosonic fields . the fermion exponents are sums of @xmath210 , @xmath214 and @xmath211 kac - moody current algebra exponents . they are not free and in fact _ bound _ together in combinations to form fermion composites . the analogue of overscreened kondo physics in string theory is the case when one considers string theory on the @xmath213 group manifold that can be described by a world - sheet wzw action and d - branes are stabilized against shrinking by quantized @xmath210 flux as discussed by bachas , douglas and schweigert @xcite ( also see @xcite ) . they considered a static d2-brane wrapping an @xmath218 parametrized by @xmath219 breaking @xmath220 to the diagonal @xmath221 . with non - zero background @xmath222 field the gauge invariant quantity is @xmath223 . if @xmath224 , where @xmath3 is the magnetic monopole number appearing due to the world - volume flux quantization @xmath225 , the d2 brane is prevented from shrinking to one of the poles of @xmath226 @xcite . inside this range the energy of the system has a unique minimum away from the poles of @xmath226 . in the large-@xmath30 limit , that minimum energy reduces to the mass of @xmath3 d - particles . the stable configuration leads in the dual picture to a bound state of @xmath3 d - particles on @xmath218 similar to the case described in @xcite . from the above physical picture ( of the underscreening and exact screening kondo effect ) one can try to see the mechanism of generation of local @xmath194 chan - paton factors of @xmath186 coincident d24-branes as a result of breaking of inherent stringy @xmath162 symmetry due to fusion of boundary spin or dynamical degrees of freedom with internal symmetry . the local operator @xmath227 near the ir fixed point breaks @xmath162 down to @xmath228 in the core of the soliton . while there is a local @xmath194 on @xmath186 coincident d24-branes , @xmath229 is again swallowed up by the internal symmetry of the system . as @xmath230 ( the exact screening case ) , the situation is similar to perturbation by the tachyon zero mode only , which leads the theory to the nonperturbative closed string vacuum and the local @xmath210 symmetry on the d25-brane is restored to the full @xmath162 symmetry . for @xmath231 ( when perturbations with all @xmath232s are triggered ) we get full @xmath162 symmetry corresponding to infinite number of d24-branes in the core of the soliton . symmetry restoration in the same context for noncommutative tachyon solitons is discussed in @xcite . it can also be seen whether the operator @xmath227 can give rise to @xmath233 copies of identity operator at ir fixed point , which are basically @xmath233 generators of @xmath194 as all operators flow to identity operators or derivative of identity operators at ir fixed point . so from the multicritical behaviour discussed above , four copies of the identity operator are left , indicating the final configuration to be that of two d24-branes . there are many unexplored questions related to the material covered in this paper . we mention some of them below along with some remarks . it would be interesting to understand the precise relationship between boundary string field theory and chern - simons string field theory . in other words , how the action in boundary sft is related to the chern - simons action in cubic sft . it is pointed out in @xcite that the boundary sft action described in certain coordinates on the space of coupling constants must be related to the cubic action described in a particular choice of coordinates on the space of string fields . the two choices of coordinates are related by some complicated singular transformation . in @xcite the boundary conformal field theory is perturbed by a simple tachyon profile with mass parameter @xmath234 that flows from zero in the uv to infinity in the ir . the lump profile has width @xmath235 which vanishes in the ir . in contrast , the level truncation scheme in cubic sft gives solitons with finite width . on the other hand , in our scheme one gets the soliton profile with finite width situated in a nearby ir fixed point . the set of values the first three tachyon harmonics evolve to in order to hit the desired ir fixed point is very close to the one obtained in the level truncation scheme in cubic sft @xcite . also the perturbative result of the boundary entropy is in good agreement with the exact result . it might be more appropriate to choose the signs of all the couplings initially to be the same or by a symmetry to be of the same sign for the zero and second modes and of opposite sign for the first mode . the former choice does not make the analysis different - we have already mentioned that the zero mode is the identity operator which appears in the rg equations only in linear order and does not contribute to the boundary entropy ( which is the only physical quantity of interest here ) . the latter choice ( that involves opposite signs for first and second modes ) makes the calculation of the boundary entropy more complicated and it does not fit in well with the setup used in @xcite . while the relationship between the our setup and the chern - simons sft is not clear , finding the reason for this ( apparent ) agreement of our result with that of @xcite is left for future work . there is a striking similarity between the beta function equations ( [ betafn2 ] ) in the first quantized theory and the string field equations of motion given below ( in the notation of @xcite ) : 2 & = & 2t_0 - 2k^3t_0 ^ 2-k^3-t_1 ^ 2-k^3-t_2 ^ 2= 0 , + 2 & = & -(1-)t_1 + 2k^3-t_0t_1 + k^3-t_1t_2=0 , + 2 & = & -(1-)t_2 + 2k^3-t_0t_2 + k^3-t_1 ^ 2 = 0 , [ sfteqn ] where @xmath236 is the inverse of the mapping radius of the punctured disks defining the three string vertex . it is maximal for the vertex of the cubic potential @xcite . the main difference is in the zero mode dependence . in the rg case the identity operator adds a constant to the action . in the rg equation the corresponding coupling constant appears in the universal linear order only . presumably there are definite complicated nonlinear relations between the different tachyon harmonics generating term proportional to @xmath237 and the cross terms @xmath238 , @xmath239 in rg equations . on the other hand since @xmath240 is dimensionless , the mapping radius @xmath241 should be somehow related to the cut - off @xmath242 in boundary conformal field theory side . in order to get a concrete relationship between our analysis with cubic string field theory we do need to develop a concrete proposal for how we can define an off - shell string field theory using our variables ; this requires choosing an appropriate uv regulator that makes the equations of motion for all the coupling constants unambiguous and free of divergence . once this is done , one can then interprete the fixed points that we have found as ( approximate ) solutions of the equations of motion of this specific string field theory . in the absence of such a field theory it is not clear what these solutions correspond to . these are of course the rg fixed points in a specific renormalization scheme , but this is a first quantized viewpoint as opposed to a second quantized one . cubic sft clearly provides such a formulation - the equations of motion involving arbitrarily high level fields do not suffer from uv divergence . the background independent sft does not provide such a formulation for all fields , but can be solved exactly for a special class of configurations ( corresponding to operators quadratic in @xmath243 ) and hence we can consider a subsector of the theory where only these operators are switched on . in this way it avoids having to do with non - renormalizable field theories . in your formulation we have switched a finite subset of the operators in an approximation scheme , but this in higher order would induce operators of arbitrarily high dimensions and so one needs to understand how to deal with non - renormalizable field theories . one way to avoid this might be to use the techniques of integrable perturbations developed by ghoshal and zamolodchikov @xcite . we have not raised issues concerning the shape and size of the lump representing the lower dimensional d - brane . as was pointed out in @xcite , in order to get some insight into this issue one needs to find the energy density of the object . since cubic sft is nonlocal , it is presently not clear how to address this . also the size might be an artifact of the particular gauge chosen . the shape and size depends on a particular definition of off - shell string field , and can vary from one sft to another . the important fact is that in chern - simons sft everything is smooth and non - singular , so it gives a good definition of the off - shell string field . there is no invariant definition of size of the d - brane unless one looks at the coupling to metric or some closed string background . presumably one needs to follow the analysis analogous to the bulk conformal perturbation theory in the presence of a fluctuating metric ( see for example @xcite ) . it is pointed out in @xcite that the dynamics of the metric makes sense only when there is a scale in the path integral , for example by fixing the area . this is done by the so - called _ gravitational dressing _ of the microscopic matter operator by the appropriate liouville dependence and inserting it in the path integral . an analogous treatment in boundary perturbation theory might give some useful insight regarding the shape and size of the d - brane . an other important issue is to extend the scheme used in this paper to superstring theories where lower dimensional d - branes are identified with a tachyonic kink solution rather than a lump solution . in the supersymmetric setup it is more convenient and sensible to study a configuration of parallel d - branes . also the size and shape of the d - branes in the ir can be investigated considering physical picture involving closed string scattering off the d - branes @xcite . it would also be of interest to study intersecting d - brane configurations using the boundary rg analysis discussed in this paper . we are grateful to michael douglas and michael green for many interesting discussions and critical reading of the manuscript . we thank david kutasov and ashoke sen for very useful discussions , correspondence and important remarks on a preliminary draft . we thank alexander zamolodchikov for a fruitful discussion on boundary entropy . sd is grateful to damtp for its hospitality in the early stages of this work . td is grateful to rutgers new high energy theory center for its hospitality in the final stages of this work . we acknowledge partial support from the pparc spg programme , `` string theory and realistic field theory '' , ppa / g / s/1998/00613 . td is supported by a scholarship of trinity college , cambridge . in this appendix we will present the details of the rg calculation in order two and three . ( s_i_f^2-s_i^2_f ) & = & - dr dr + [ order2a ] where we have expanded the cosines in @xmath72 . the ellipsis represent the @xmath245 ( which is identical to the @xmath244 part under replacement of @xmath52 by @xmath246 ) and @xmath247 contributions . following the arguments given in section 2 , we reach to the following expression & & ( s_i_f^2-s_i^2_f ) + & & = _ 1_2 ^ 2(1-dl)dr g_f(r)dr ( + & & -)+ + & & = _ 1_2 ^ 2(1-dl)dr g_f(r)dr + , where in the last step we expanded the cosines in @xmath72 about @xmath250 . by the same argument applied to @xmath244 part we can neglect the ( gradient)@xmath74 terms . as the field @xmath20 is odd under @xmath249 reflection , the overall sine terms are not invariant under this operation and hence do not contribute . hence using ( [ fastgf1 ] ) and the nonuniversal constants resulting from the integrals ( s_i_f^2-s_i^2_f ) = 2 ^ 2dl ( 3_s(r ) -_s(r))+ , [ order2double - mixed ] neglecting the @xmath79 terms . typically the integrals in ( [ i2i3 ] ) are divergent . but we have regulated them excluding the origin which is sensible in present case . & & 1 6s_i^3_f -1 2s_i_f s_i^2_f+1 3s_i_f^3 + & = & -dt_1dt_2dt_3 \ { ( dl ln|| ) + & & + ( dl ( ln|| + 4 ) ) + & & + ( dl ( ln|| -2 ) ) + & & + ( dl ( ln|| -2 ) ) } + , + & & [ order3double1 ] neglecting the @xmath79 terms . the ellipsis represent the @xmath251 , @xmath252 , and @xmath253 contributions . the @xmath251 and @xmath253 are related to @xmath254 and @xmath252 by exchanging @xmath255 respectively . we again introduce center - of - mass coordinate @xmath256 and relative coordinates @xmath257 and @xmath258 . the relative coordinates being bounded within the uv cut - off @xmath259 , the green s functions are truly short - ranged and we can expand the cosines in @xmath260 . the result is & & 1 6s_i^3_f-1 2s_i_f s_i^2_f+1 3s_i_f^3 + & = & -_1 ^ 3dl + . + & & [ order3c ] since under reflection of @xmath261 the integrand containing sine is odd , it vanishes identically . the @xmath261 integration containing @xmath262 vanishes imposing equation of motion from the action where the bulk degrees of freedom have been integrated out . hence the expression for @xmath254 cubic contribution is & & s_i^3_f-1 2s_i_f s_i^2_f+1 3s_i_f^3 + & = & _ 1 ^ 2_2(1-dl ) dt_1dt_2dt_3 + + & & as in the previous case we introduce the center - of - mass coordinate @xmath263 and relative coordinates @xmath264 and @xmath265 . expanding the cosines in @xmath260 , the above expression can be written approximately as dldr_1dr_2 ( ln r_1-ln r_2 ) d|r ( 4_s(|r)-*1 ) which vanishes identically after integration over @xmath266 and @xmath267 . by doing similar analysis for @xmath253 , we conclude that all the contributions to @xmath252 and @xmath253 vanishes . * s. ghoshal and a. zamolodchikov , _ boundary s - matrix and boundary state in two - dimensional integrable quantum field theoory _ a9 * 3841 ( 1994 ) ; erratum - ibid . * a9 * 4353 ( 1994 ) ; hep - th/9306002 . Abstract:
[ "renormalization group analysis of boundary conformal field theory on bosonic d25-brane is used to study tachyon condensation . placing the lump on a finite circle and triggering only the first three tachyon modes , the theory flows to nearby ir fixed point representing lumps that are extended object with definite profile . the boundary entropy corresponding to the d24-brane tension is calculated in the leading order in perturbative analysis which decreases under rg flow and agrees with the expected result to an accuracy of @xmath0 . multicritical behaviour of the ir theory suggests that the end point of the flow represents a configuration of two d24-branes . analogy with kondo physics is discussed . we comment on @xmath1 symmetry restoration . damtp-2000 - 121 + runhetc-2000 - 41 + hep - th/0010247 + 0.5 cm + * of tachyon condensation * 1.0 cm satabhisa dasgupta 0.5 cm _ department of physics and astronomy , rutgers university , + piscataway , nj 08855 , u.s.a . _ 0.5 cm tathagata dasgupta 0.5 cm _ department of applied mathematics and theoretical physics + wilberforce road , cambridge , cb3 0wa , u.k . _ 1.0 cm" ]
12,293
12,293
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: many communication protocols implicitly require that the communicating parties share a reference frame @xcite . for instance , if one party , alice , transmits qubits to another party , bob , using spin-1/2 particles , the quantum state of the collection can only be recovered by bob if he and alice share a reference frame for orientation . lacking such a shared reference frame ( for instance , by lacking knowledge of the relation between their local reference frames ) is equivalent to having a noisy channel ; the density operator relative to bob s local frame is the average over rotations of the density operator relative to alice s local frame . for a single qubit , such an average over rotations yields complete decoherence no information about the quantum state survives nonetheless , alice and bob can still achieve perfect classical and quantum communication by encoding the information into the rotationally - invariant degrees of freedom of many qubits @xcite . indeed , in the limit of large numbers , the cost of not sharing a reference frame is only logarithmic in the number of systems . similarly , if alice and bob lack a phase reference , they can still encode classical and quantum information in phase - invariant states of composite systems @xcite . however , such communication schemes are technically challenging to implement because they make use of highly entangled states of many qubits @xcite . such schemes will be referred to here as `` calibration - free '' . a more straightforward strategy for coping with the lack of a shared reference frame is for alice and bob to begin their communication protocol by setting up a shared reference frame , that is , they begin by calibrating or aligning their local reference frames . thereafter alice transmits her quantum systems normally . this strategy is illustrated in figure [ fig : figure1 ] . the problem of aligning reference frames using finite communication resources has been well studied @xcite . if only finite communication resources are devoted to the task , then the token of alice s reference frame that is transmitted to bob will be of bounded size . assuming the reference frame in question is associated with a continuous degree of freedom , this bound leads to a nonzero probability of error in the decoding of messages . nonetheless , this scheme has two advantages over its calibration - free counterpart : ( i ) alice does not need to implement any entangling operations to encode classical bits or logical qubits into the physical qubits , nor does bob require such operations to decode ( they may require entangling operations to prepare and measure the reference frame token , but the preparation and measurement they require is always the same and their effort does not scale with the size of the message ) ; ( ii ) if alice wishes to communicate a classical bit string or a string of logical qubit states , she can encode one logical bit or qubit per physical qubit , and bob can decode one logical bit or qubit per physical qubit ( in other words , the blocks of physical qubits into which they encode and decode their logical bits and qubits can be as small as one , unlike the calibration - free scheme ) . by virtue of ( ii ) , alice does not need to know the entire message string at the outset to achieve her optimal communication rate , nor does bob need to store all of the systems coherently until he has received the entire sequence of physical qubits , whereas such capabilities are required to achieve the optimal rate of communication in the calibration - free scheme . we are therefore motivated to explore how well alice can communicate quantum information to bob after supplying him with a bounded - size token of her reference frame . by the state @xmath0 and the system @xmath1 by the state @xmath2 . bob , who is not correlated with alice s reference frame , describes the joint state of @xmath3 and @xmath1 as the twirling of alice s description , namely @xmath4 . b ) we can consider alice s act of adjoining the reference frame token to the system together with the twirling as an encoding operation @xmath5 . composing this with bob s decoding operation @xmath3 , the resulting channel can be described as an effective @xmath6.,width=302 ] the general case we consider is that of a reference frame associated with a compact lie group @xmath7 . if the system is prepared in the state @xmath2 and the reference frame token in the state @xmath8 relative to alice s local reference frame , then relative to bob s local reference frame , the pair is in the state @xmath9 = \mathcal{g } ( |e\rangle \langle e| \otimes \rho ) \,,\ ] ] where @xmath10 averages over the collective action of the group and is termed the @xmath7-twirling operation ( see figure [ fig : figure1 ] ) . this state encodes @xmath2 . we consider the case where the reference frame token is prepared in a particular state @xmath8 , suggested by previous investigations @xcite , which is near - optimal for transmitting information about the group element and which makes the mathematics particularly simple . we then determine how well bob can reconstruct the state @xmath2 . it turns out that the recovery ( or decoding ) operation @xmath11 that is equal to the hilbert - schmidt adjoint of @xmath5 , normalized to be trace - preserving , is provably near - optimal ( in a sense we will define later ) . the composition of encoding and decoding yields an effective decoherence of the form @xmath12 where @xmath13 is a probability distribution over the group with @xmath14 the group - invariant measure , @xmath15 and @xmath16 are unitary representations of @xmath7 on the system @xmath1 and the reference frame token @xmath3 respectively . with our particular choice of reference state @xmath8 , we find that @xmath17 for all @xmath18 , ensuring that @xmath19 is a @xmath7-invariant map ( it commutes with the action of every @xmath20 ) . the figure of merit relative to which the decoding operation is judged to be near - optimal is the entanglement fidelity . we also demonstrate two distinct ways of implementing this decoding operation . the first is an obvious scheme : bob estimates the orientation of the token relative to his local frame and then re - orients the system appropriately . we call this the `` measure and re - orient '' scheme . the second is less intuitive , but reveals more about the structure of the problem : bob projects into the virtual subsystems that support the representation of the group induced by _ relative _ transformations of the system and token and implements an isometry that maps these onto a single hilbert space . we call this the `` extract from the relational subsystems '' scheme . these relational subsystems are the places in the hilbert space of the combined token and system where the quantum information associated with @xmath2 is to be found . their characterization is the key technical result of the article . the second scheme is also particularly interesting because , with a slight modification , it can yield a decoding that is probabilistically perfect , that is , one which sometimes fails but which yields a perfect decoding when it succeeds . we work out the explicit form of the recovery operation @xmath11 and the effective decoherence @xmath19 for several interesting examples : ( i ) a phase reference ; ( ii ) a cartesian frame ( representing an orthogonal triad of spatial directions ) ; ( iii ) a reference direction ( representing a single spatial direction ) . in each case , we consider a system consisting of a single qubit . the explicit form of the decoherence map is actually quite simple in this case . because @xmath19 is a @xmath7-invariant map , it follows from the results of ref . @xcite that it is a sum of irreducible @xmath7-invariant maps called moments . but in the case of a qubit , there is only a single nontrivial moment the @xmath7-twirling map @xmath10 . thus , we have @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the identity map . we show that for our examples , @xmath23 is inversely proportional to the size of the reference frame token , @xmath24 where the size of the reference frame is given by the quantum number of the highest irreducible representation appearing in the state of the token . it is also shown that in probabilistically perfect decoding schemes , the probability of failure is inversely proportional to the size of the reference frame token . these results are specific to the special form of reference frame state that we consider here . the idea that bounded - size quantum reference frames induce an effective decoherence is not new . the effect of a bounded - size clock , which is a kind of phase reference , has been considered previously by many authors @xcite and that of a bounded - size directional frame has been considered by poulin @xcite . our results go beyond this work in several ways . for one , the case of a cartesian frame , which is particularly significant given that it is representative of the general non - abelian case , has not been examined before . more significantly , we consider many different sorts of reference frames within a unified framework and we provide insight into the structure of the problem . it should be noted that although our method can be applied to a system of arbitrary dimension , we here obtain explicit expressions for the effective decoherence only in the case of the simplest possible system : a qubit . we hope to provide a discussion of the foundational implications of modeling bounded - size reference frames by effective decoherence in a subsequent paper . finally , it is worth pointing out that the problem of communication in the presence of a bounded - size reference frame has interesting connections with a disparate set of topics in quantum information theory and the theory of quantum reference frames : _ partially correlated reference frames . _ when some information is known about the relative orientation of alice and bob s local reference frames , they are said to share partially correlated reference frames . this is a resource that interpolates between having and lacking a shared reference frame . its quality can be characterized by the probability distribution over the relative orientation the more peaked the distribution , the better the correlation . what can be achieved with this resource is an interesting question that has only begun to be addressed . we gain some insight into the question in this article because the `` measure and re - orient '' implementation of the recovery operation begins with a reference frame alignment protocol @xcite that leaves alice and bob holding partially correlated reference frames . _ programmable operations . _ there have been many investigations into the possibility of encoding an operation into a quantum state such that the state can subsequently be used to implement the operation on another system . if the system into which the operation is encoded is bounded in size , then it is known that one can only achieve an approximate version of the operation or a perfect version with non - unit probability @xcite . the token of the quantum reference frame in our communication protocol is an instance of a program that encodes the unitary that relates alice s local reference frame to bob s . bob subsequently uses it to implement the inverse of this unitary on the system . our results therefore provide interesting examples of both approximate and unambiguous programmable operations . _ measures of the quality of a quantum reference frame . _ our results also contribute to the project of quantifying the extent to which a quantum reference frame of bounded size can stand in for one of unbounded size @xcite , an important element of a resource theory of quantum reference frames . for instance , a measure of the strength of the effective decoherence associated with the bounded - size reference frame may serve as an operational measure of its quality . _ private channels . _ if no party besides bob has a sample of alice s rf , then alice and bob are said to possess a _ private _ shared reference frame . these have been shown to constitute a novel kind of key that is useful for private communication schemes @xcite . our results establish a lower bound on the fidelity between input and output in private communication schemes that rely on bob possessing a bounded - size token of alice s reference frame . they also establish a bound on the probability of achieving perfect fidelity by post - selection . this cryptographic application provides a particularly useful perspective on bob s recovery operation : the message is encoded in the relative orientation between the system and the token of alice s reference frame in the same way that the plain - text in classical cryptography is encoded in the bit - wise parity of the cypher - text message and the key . bob decodes by using the token of alice s frame as a key . _ dense coding . _ as noted above in point ( ii ) , the calibration - free communication scheme requires alice to know the entire message to be sent prior to transmitting any systems to bob if she is to achieve the maximum rate . in the communication scheme that first sets up a bounded - size reference frame , alice can transmit to bob the quantum token of her local reference frame prior to knowing anything about the message . consequently , alice can use the quantum channel at an early time , when it is perhaps cheaper , to enhance the communication capacity at a future time , when it is known what message is to be sent . sending the frame token is therefore akin to establishing entanglement in a dense coding scheme @xcite . one difference , however , is that the fidelity of communication is never perfect for a bounded - size token whereas a single maximally - entangled state allows for perfect communication of one qubit . in this section , we present some formal mathematical tools that are useful for describing classical and quantum reference frames . we follow the notation of @xcite , to which we refer the reader for further details . suppose alice and bob are considering a single quantum system described by a hilbert space @xmath25 . let this system transform via a representation of a group @xmath7 relative to some reference frame . we will restrict our attention to lie groups that are compact , so that they possess a group - invariant ( haar ) measure @xmath14 , and act on @xmath25 via a _ unitary _ representation @xmath26 , ensuring that they are completely reducible @xcite . let @xmath20 be the group element that describes the passive transformation from alice s to bob s reference frame . furthermore , suppose that @xmath27 is completely unknown , i.e. , that alice s reference frame and bob s are uncorrelated . it follows that if alice prepares a system in the state @xmath2 on @xmath25 relative to her frame , then it is represented relative to bob s frame by the state @xmath28 = \int_g \text{d}g\ , u(g ) \rho u^\dag(g ) \ , . \label{eq : averagedstate}\ ] ] the action of the representation @xmath26 of the ( compact lie ) group @xmath7 on @xmath25 yields a very useful structure . it allows for a decomposition of the hilbert space into a direct sum of _ charge sectors _ , labeled by an index @xmath29 , where each charge sector carries an inequivalent representation @xmath30 of @xmath7 . each sector can be further decomposed into a tensor product of a subsystem @xmath31 carrying an irreducible representation ( irrep ) of @xmath7 and a subsystem @xmath32 carrying a trivial representation of @xmath7 . that is , @xmath33 note that this tensor product does not correspond to the standard tensor product obtained by combining multiple qubits : it is _ virtual _ @xcite . the spaces @xmath31 and @xmath32 are therefore _ virtual subsystems_. expressed in terms of this decomposition of the hilbert space , the map @xmath10 takes a particularly simple form , given by @xmath34 = \sum_q ( \mathcal{d}_{\mathcal{m}^{(q ) } } \otimes \mathcal{i}_{\mathcal{n}^{(q)}})[\pi^{(q ) } \rho \pi^{(q ) } ] \,,\ ] ] where @xmath35 is the projection into the charge sector @xmath29 , @xmath36 denotes the trace - preserving operation that takes every operator on the hilbert space @xmath37 to a constant times the identity operator on that space , and @xmath38 denotes the identity map over operators in the space @xmath39 . a proof of this result is provided in ref . @xcite . note that the operation @xmath10 has the general form of _ whereas decoherence typically describes correlation with an environment to which one does not have access , in this case the decoherence describes correlation with a reference frame to which one does not have access @xcite . consider a communication scheme wherein alice prepares a system @xmath3 in a pure quantum state @xmath8 and sends it to bob as a quantum sample of her reference frame , together with a system @xmath1 ( a collection of qubits for example ) that is described by a quantum state @xmath2 relative to her reference frame . let @xmath3 transform via the unitary representation @xmath16 of @xmath7 , and @xmath1 via the unitary representation @xmath15 . the lack of a shared reference frame between alice and bob implies that the transmitted composite @xmath40 is described relative to bob s reference frame by the @xmath7-invariant state @xmath41 \ , , \label{eq : ginvstate}\ ] ] where @xmath42 is the @xmath7-twirling operation of ( [ eq : averagedstate ] ) for the representation @xmath43 of @xmath7 . this map @xmath5 will be referred to as the _ encoding map_. note that its input space is @xmath44 ( the bounded operators on @xmath45 ) , while its output space is @xmath46 . it maps @xmath2 to a @xmath7-invariant state of the composite @xmath40 . it is useful to define the set of states @xmath47 which form the orbit under the representation @xmath16 of @xmath7 of the fiducial state @xmath8 ( associated with the identity element of the group ) . by expressing the @xmath7-twirling operation explicitly and making use of these , we can express the encoding operation as @xmath48 the encoding map clearly depends on the choice of the state @xmath8 for the reference frame . we turn to this choice now . we begin by considering what properties of a quantum state make it a good representative of a reference frame for the group @xmath7 ( the case wherein the reference frame is associated with a coset space will be considered in section [ sec : direction ] ) ; for a more complete discussion , see @xcite . states @xmath49 corresponding to different orientations of the reference frame must be distinct , so at the very least one requires that the the fiducial state @xmath8 is not invariant with respect to @xmath7 or any subgroup thereof . to emulate a perfect reference frame for @xmath7 , these states must in fact be perfectly distinguishable , @xmath50 where @xmath51 is the delta - function on @xmath7 defined by @xmath52 for any continuous function @xmath53 of @xmath7 , where @xmath54 is the identity element in @xmath7 . if the states latexmath:[$\ { requirements , then @xmath16 is the _ left regular representation _ of @xmath7 . in the case of a lie group , the dimensionality of any system @xmath56 that carries the regular representation must necessarily be infinite . we refer to such an infinite - dimensional quantum rf as _ unbounded _ ; such systems and states were considered in ref . @xcite . if the hilbert space dimensionality of the system @xmath3 serving as a quantum rf is finite , then we say that the quantum rf is _ of bounded size_. if the rf is associated with a lie group , having a continuum of elements , then a bound on the size of the rf implies that the condition ( [ eq : deltafunction ] ) can not be satisfied precisely . in this case , a key question is : what state on @xmath3 is the best approximation to a perfect reference frame ? the answer will depend on the figure of merit for the task at hand , but we will make use of a generic construction @xcite that illustrates the key features . suppose the representation @xmath16 reduces to a set of irreps @xmath57 , @xmath58 where the tensor product is the one appearing in the decomposition ( [ eq : hdecompfull ] ) of @xmath59 and where @xmath60 is the identity on @xmath61 . we are interested in a special subset of these irreps , namely , the @xmath62 that appear in the decomposition of @xmath16 a number of times greater than or equal to their dimension @xmath63 , i.e. those for which @xmath64 we denote the set of @xmath29 that label such irreps by @xmath65 and , in what follows , we will be restricting our attention to only these irreps . also , for irreps @xmath66 , choose an arbitrary subspace @xmath67 with dimension @xmath63 , i.e. , with dimension equal to that of @xmath68 . we now define a new hilbert space @xmath69 as @xmath70 which is of dimension @xmath71 the state of @xmath3 that we will use for our quantum rf is @xmath72 where @xmath73 is an arbitrary basis for @xmath31 , and @xmath74 an arbitrary basis for @xmath75 . note that the orbit of @xmath8 under @xmath7 has support in @xmath69 . the embedding @xmath76 provides a way of embedding @xmath8 in the original hilbert space @xmath59 , and in addition @xmath16 acts on the hilbert space @xmath69 in the obvious way . if @xmath65 contained all irreps of @xmath7 , then @xmath16 would be the ( left ) regular representation , and for a lie group the hilbert space @xmath69 would be infinite dimensional . if the quantum rf is of bounded size , then a limited set of irreps appear in @xmath65 . we note that , for the problem of optimally encoding a reference frame relative to a maximum likelihood figure of merit , given a general hilbert space @xmath59 the optimal states will not have this precise form @xcite . however , such optimal states do take the form of eq . when restricted to @xmath69 . these are the states of interest here . the restriction to irreps having the special property of eq . ( [ eq : specialproperty ] ) is in fact critical for our analysis , because only in this case can we define a useful _ right _ action of @xmath7 on the hilbert space @xcite . consider the representation @xmath77 of @xmath7 defined by its action on the covariant set as @xmath78 to obtain an explicit form for this right action in terms of the decomposition of eq . , we make use of the fact that the state @xmath8 is maximally entangled across the virtual tensor products @xmath79 . thus , we have for any transformation @xmath80 on a subsystem @xmath68 the identity @xmath81 where @xmath82 denotes the transpose , @xmath83 the complex conjugate , and we have made use of the fact that @xmath62 is unitary . given that the complex conjugate of a representation @xmath62 of @xmath7 is also a representation of @xmath7 ( called the conjugate representation and denoted by @xmath84 ) , we can define a representation @xmath77 by @xmath85 in contrast to @xmath16 , the representation @xmath77 acts on the subsystems @xmath86 irreducibly according to the conjugate representation @xmath87 , and leaves the subsystems @xmath68 invariant . clearly , the two actions @xmath16 and @xmath77 commute . furthermore , it is easy to verify that @xmath77 satisfies eq . ( [ eq : rightaction ] ) . as the states of the reference frame are restricted to the hilbert space @xmath69 , it is useful to consider our encoding operation @xmath5 of eq . ( [ eq : encoding ] ) with fiducial state @xmath8 of eq . ( [ eq : chiribella ] ) as a map from @xmath44 to @xmath88 . for the remainder of this paper , we consider the encoding map to be defined thus . finally , we note that the map @xmath5 with the fiducial state @xmath8 chosen to be of the form ( [ eq : chiribella ] ) is unital . ( because the input and output spaces of @xmath5 are of differing dimension , we define _ unital _ for such a trace - preserving map as one which maps the ( normalized ) completely mixed state to the completely mixed state . ) this result is seen as @xmath89 where @xmath90 is the dimension of @xmath45 . here , we have used the fact that the maximally - entangled states @xmath91 in eq . ( [ eq : chiribella ] ) have reduced density matrices on @xmath92 that are proportional to the identity . it is illustrative to investigate the action of the encoding map ( the fiducial state @xmath8 will be assumed to be given by eq . ( [ eq : chiribella ] ) except in the final section of the article ) and to explicitly identify the subsystems of @xmath93 into which the system s state is encoded . the details of this section require extensive use of the virtual tensor product structure of @xmath94 induced by the unitary representation @xmath95 of @xmath7 , given in eq . , as well as an application of the stinespring theorem for covariant maps @xcite ; this section may be skipped on first reading . to facilitate this , we first state the main result of this section prior to our detailed investigation of the encoding map . main result : : : according to eq . , the joint hilbert space @xmath94 can be decomposed under the representation @xmath95 of @xmath7 as @xmath96 where @xmath97 are the set of irreps @xmath29 of @xmath7 that appear in the decomposition of @xmath95 . the encoding map yields @xmath7-invariant density operators which , in terms of the decomposition , are block - diagonal in the irreps @xmath98 and , within each block , have the form of a tensor product of the completely mixed state on the subsystem @xmath99 and some non - trivial state on the subsystem @xmath100 . thus , the action of the encoding can be expressed as @xmath101 where @xmath102 is the identity operator on @xmath99 , and @xmath103 is a trace - decreasing map from states on @xmath45 to states on @xmath100 . we show below that , under the assumption that @xmath45 is an irrep of @xmath7 , each of these encodings @xmath103 takes the form @xmath104 where @xmath105 is the identity operator on a hilbert space @xmath106 carrying an irrep @xmath87 of @xmath7 , and @xmath107 is a linear map satisfying @xmath108 . in addition , each map @xmath109 takes a very simple form , which depends on the irrep @xmath29 . specifically , there is a subset of irreps @xmath110 such that , for @xmath111 , the map @xmath109 is a bijective isometry , that is , a unitary ; in these instances , the map @xmath103 can be inverted and @xmath2 can be recovered perfectly . for @xmath29 not in @xmath112 , the map @xmath109 is an isometry that is not surjective , i.e. , it maps onto a _ proper subspace _ of @xmath113 . the map @xmath103 is not invertible in these cases . we can identify the relational degrees of freedom in which the message is encoded by investigating how relational transformations act on the hilbert space @xmath94 . the subsystems @xmath99 carry an irreducible representation of @xmath7 corresponding to the collective action @xmath95 and describe collective degrees of freedom . in contrast , the subsystems @xmath100 are relational . however , not all degrees of freedom in @xmath100 describe relations of the system @xmath1 to the reference frame @xmath3 ; some of these describe relations among the parts of @xmath3 ( or among the parts of @xmath1 if the latter are composite systems ) . we seek to identify , for each irrep @xmath29 , the precise subsystem of @xmath100 into which the message state @xmath2 is encoded . the system hilbert space @xmath45 carries a representation @xmath15 of @xmath7 . if we act with @xmath7 on the system but not on the rf , this will induce a relative transformation of the two ; however , this action alone is not @xmath7-invariant . while it is possible to construct a @xmath7-invariant action of @xmath15 by using the techniques of refs . @xcite , it is much more straightforward to make use of the right action @xmath77 of @xmath7 defined in eq . ( [ eq : rightaction ] ) . this action commutes with the left action @xmath16 , and thus also commutes with the collective action @xmath95 of @xmath7 . by acting with @xmath114 for @xmath18 on a state @xmath115 of the form , we have @xmath116 where we have used the invariance of the haar measure . the action of @xmath114 on @xmath117 yields another invariant state , but one which is now an encoding of the transformed state @xmath118 . thus , @xmath114 acts as a transformation of the relation between @xmath1 and @xmath3 . a map @xmath5 satisfying eq . is called _ @xmath7-covariant_. as @xmath77 is a relational action , it acts on the subsystems @xmath100 in eq . ; we now decompose these subsystems according to the irreps of @xmath7 under the action of @xmath77 , and in doing so identify the subsystems in which we find the image of @xmath2 under the encoding map . at this stage , we restrict our attention to the case where @xmath15 is an irrep of @xmath7 , labelled @xmath119 . it appears straightforward ( although with substantially more burdensome notation ) to extend our results to the general case wherein this restriction is relaxed . indeed , the u(1 ) example considered in sec . [ sec : phase ] provides evidence of the generality of our theorem . however , we do not consider the general case here . recall that the reference frame @xmath3 has a hilbert space given by eq . , and the system s hilbert space is @xmath120 . thus , @xmath121 where @xmath122 denotes that the irreps @xmath123 and @xmath119 couple to the irrep @xmath29 , @xmath124 is the multiplicity space for the irrep @xmath29 in tensor representation @xmath125 , and where @xmath97 is the set of all irreps that are obtained by coupling some irrep @xmath126 to @xmath119 . comparing the expression above with eq . , the subsystems @xmath100 are given by @xmath127 we use the fact that if @xmath122 , then @xmath128 @xcite , and that @xmath129 @xcite . thus , @xmath130 where each subsystem @xmath131 on the right - hand side carries an irrep @xmath132 of @xmath7 under the action @xmath77 . ( we note that in the examples presented in the latter sections , with groups @xmath133 and @xmath134 , the subsystems @xmath135 are trivial and can be ignored . ) at this stage , we will make use of the @xmath7-covariance of the encoding map @xmath5 , given by eq . , to determine how the message is encoded into the relational subsystems @xmath100 . as the state @xmath136 is @xmath7-invariant under the action of @xmath95 for any @xmath2 , it can be expressed according to the hilbert space decomposition as @xmath137 where @xmath102 is the identity operator on @xmath99 and @xmath138 is an ( unnormalized ) density operator on @xmath100 . this expression defines a set of trace - decreasing superoperators @xmath139 ; note that the latter can be naturally embedded in the full multiplicity spaces @xmath140 of the combined system . from eq . ( [ eq : unital ] ) , we see that the maps @xmath103 are also unital in that @xmath141 is proportional ( because @xmath103 is trace - decreasing ) to the identity on @xmath100 . also , as @xmath77 commutes with @xmath95 , we have that each term @xmath103 is itself @xmath7-covariant , satisfying @xmath142 . we now make use of the stinespring theorem for covariant cp maps @xcite ; in particular , we use a form due to keyl and werner @xcite for unital covariant cp maps . there exists another unitary representation @xmath143 of @xmath7 on a space @xmath106 and an _ intertwiner _ ( linear map ) @xmath144 satisfying @xmath108 with @xmath145 such that @xmath146 the form of eq . allows us to identify a suitable stinespring extension . the representation @xmath147 acts on @xmath100 through what appears to be ( ignoring the limits on the sum @xmath148 ) a tensor representation of an irrep @xmath87 with an irrep @xmath119 . thus , we can choose our stinespring extension in a minimal way such that @xmath143 acts on @xmath106 irreducibly as the irrep @xmath87 of @xmath7 . the operators @xmath109 intertwine the representation @xmath147 with the collective representation @xmath149 on @xmath113 . we now consider two cases : * case a : * if @xmath98 is such that , for all @xmath123 obtained via @xmath150 then @xmath126 , ( i.e. , @xmath65 contains all of the irreps @xmath123 that one can obtain by @xmath150 ) , then the direct sum hilbert space in eq . is given by @xmath151 where @xmath152 denotes that these spaces are unitarily equivalent ; that is , the map @xmath109 is a bijective isometry and simply represents the clebsch - gordan transformation relating the tensor product of two irreps with the direct sum decomposition of @xmath100 given in . let @xmath153 denote the set of irreps satisfying this condition . * case b : * if , however , @xmath98 is such that the condition of case a fails ( i.e. @xmath65 does _ not _ contain all of the irreps @xmath123 that one can obtain by coupling @xmath87 and @xmath119 ) , then the intertwiner is no longer surjective . rather , the intertwiner maps @xmath100 onto a proper subspace of @xmath113 , specifically the subspace defined by the carrier space of the irreps @xmath132 , with @xmath126 , obtained through the coupling of the irrep @xmath87 on @xmath106 with the irrep @xmath119 on @xmath45 . ( this space is necessarily a proper subspace of @xmath154 because , by the conditions of case b , @xmath65 does not contain all irreps obtained in this coupling . ) a set of basis states for this subspace can be calculated explicitly in any particular instance using the clebsch - gordan coefficients for the group @xmath7 . we now turn to the probabilities of each of these cases . we note that @xmath155 = { \rm tr}[\mathcal{e}^{(q)}(\rho)]$ ] is the probability that the system is encoded into the irrep @xmath29 . we now prove that , for the case where @xmath45 carries an irrep @xmath15 of @xmath7 , this probability is independent of @xmath2 . using eq . ( [ eq : eq ] ) , we have @xmath156 \nonumber \\ & = \int { \rm d}g \frac{d_q}{d_r } { \rm tr}_{\bar{\mathcal{n}}^{(q)}_{rs}}\bigl[v^{(q^*)}(g ) a^{(q)\dag } \bigl(i_{\mathcal{k}^{(q ) } } \otimes \rho \bigr ) \nonumber \\ & \qquad \times a^{(q ) } v^{(q^*)}(g)^{-1 } \bigr ] \nonumber \\ & = \frac{d_q}{d_r } { \rm tr}_{\bar{\mathcal{n}}^{(q)}_{rs}}\bigl [ a^{(q)\dag } \bigl(i_{\mathcal{k}^{(q ) } } \otimes \int { \rm d}g\ , u_s(g)\rho u_s(g)^{-1 } \bigr)a^{(q ) } \bigr ] , \nonumber \\ % & = \frac{d_q}{d_s d_r } { \rm tr}_{\bar{\mathcal{n}}^{(q)}_{rs}}\bigl [ a^{(q)\dag}a^{(q)}\bigr]\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the second line we have used the g - invariance of @xmath103 and in the third line we have used eq . ( [ eq : intertwiner ] ) . because @xmath45 is an irrep , it follows that @xmath157 where @xmath158 , and therefore @xmath159 is independent of @xmath2 for all @xmath29 . the su(2 ) case , presented in sec . [ sec : cartesian ] , provides an explicit example of this . we note that for the general case , where the system does not carry an irrep of @xmath7 , then this probability can be state - dependent . for example , if @xmath45 is a direct sum of irreps @xmath119 , then @xmath160 where @xmath161 is the projector onto the @xmath119 irrep of @xmath45 . in this case , for @xmath162 ( where @xmath163 is unitary ) , we have @xmath164 , independent of @xmath2 . however , for @xmath165 , the weight @xmath159 can depend on @xmath2 . this occurs for the u(1 ) case , as seen explicitly in sec . [ sec : phase ] . with each map @xmath103 now defined through eq . ( [ eq : eq ] ) , we can explicitly express @xmath5 in kraus operator form as @xmath166 , where @xmath167 and where @xmath168 is a basis for @xmath99 and @xmath169 is a basis for @xmath106 . finally , we point out a useful expression for @xmath103 ( which applies regardless of whether @xmath45 carries an irrep of @xmath7 ) . from eq . ( [ eq : eofrho ] ) , it is clear that @xmath170 combining this with the expression for @xmath5 in eq . ( [ eq : ginvstate ] ) and making use of eq . ( [ eq : generaldecoherencedfulldfree ] ) , we obtain @xmath171\,.\ ] ] this form will be used frequently when working out explicit examples . in the communication protocol we are considering , bob s task is to recover the quantum message @xmath2 by implementing a decoding map @xmath172 . a useful recovery map to consider is the following @xmath173 where the adjoint for superoperators is defined relative to the hilbert - schmidt inner product , @xmath174)= \mathrm{tr}(\mathcal{e}[a ] b)$ ] . the map @xmath11 is completely positive and linear , because the superoperator adjoint preserves these features . it is also trace - preserving . to see this fact , observe that @xmath175 , where @xmath176 is the identity operator on @xmath69 ; consequently , for @xmath177 , we have @xmath178=\mathrm{tr}[\rho_{rs}\mathcal{r}^{\dag}(i_{s } ) ] = \mathrm{tr}[\rho_{rs}]$ ] . we have therefore verified that @xmath11 is a valid quantum operation that can be implemented deterministically . assuming that there is no prior information about the input state to @xmath5 , the map @xmath179 is precisely the `` approximate reversal '' operation for @xmath5 proposed by barnum and knill @xcite which yields an error no more than twice that of the optimal reversal operation . the error here is defined in terms of the deviation from unity of the average entanglement fidelity for an arbitrary input ensemble . given a superoperator @xmath180 , the adjoint @xmath181 is easily determined through a kraus decomposition of @xmath180 . specifically , if @xmath182=\sum_{i } k_{i}\rho k_{i}^{\dag}$ ] then @xmath183=\sum_{i}k_{i}^{\dag } \rho k_{i}$ ] . the expression ( [ eq : encoding ] ) for the encoding map @xmath5 provides one kraus decomposition : the covariant set of operators @xmath184 , where @xmath185 . it follows that a covariant set of kraus operators for @xmath186 is @xmath187 where @xmath188 and consequently @xmath189 = d_r \int\mathrm{d}g\bigl ( \langle g| \otimes u_{s}^{\dag}(g)\bigr ) \rho_{rs}\bigl ( |g\rangle \otimes u_{s}(g)\bigr ) \,.\ ] ] from this expression , we see that one way in which @xmath11 can be implemented is as follows : measure the covariant povm @xmath190 on @xmath1 , and finally discard @xmath3 and the measurement result @xmath27 . we refer to this as the `` measure and re - orient '' implementation of the decoding map . ( it is the adjoint of the `` prepare and @xmath7-twirl '' implementation of the encoding map . ) so we see that the decoding map we are considering is in fact the most obvious recovery scheme one can imagine ! bob simply estimates the relative orientation between alice s reference frame and his own by measuring how the sample @xmath3 of alice s rf is oriented , then re - orients the system appropriately ( i.e. in such a way that it is finally oriented relative to his rf in precisely the way that it was initially oriented relative to alice s rf ) . one can view the system @xmath3 as a cryptographic key or calibrating system that contains the information for how to recover the quantum state of @xmath1 . it is noteworthy that this implementation of bob s decoding map does not require any entangling operations between @xmath3 and @xmath1 . bob can achieve it with local operations and classical communication ( locc ) between @xmath3 and @xmath1 . because bob does not need to possess @xmath1 to implement the appropriate measurement on @xmath3 , it follows that alice can subsequently transmit an arbitrary number of systems and bob can decode these with the same fidelity as the first . consider the action of the decoding map on states @xmath115 , i.e. , on states of the form of eq . . after a measurement on @xmath3 having outcome @xmath191 , followed by a transformation @xmath192 to system @xmath1 , the reduced density operator on @xmath1 is @xmath193 & = d_r \int \text{d}g\ , |\langle g|g'\rangle |^{2}\ , u_s((g')^{-1}g)\rho u_s^{\dag}((g')^{-1}g ) \nonumber \\ & = d_r \int \text{d}g\ , | \langle e|g\rangle |^{2}\ , u_s(g)\rho u_s^{\dag } ( g)\ , , \label{eq : method2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the simplification occurs because d@xmath27 is invariant . note that the result is independent of the outcome @xmath191 . it is straightforward to check that this state is normalized , as @xmath194 . this is precisely how a state @xmath2 relative to alice s frame would be redescribed relative to bob s frame if their relative orientation @xmath27 was known to be distributed according to the probability distribution @xmath195 . if @xmath196 as a function of @xmath27 is highly peaked around the identity group element @xmath197 then the only unitary that will contribute significantly in the integral will be the identity operation , and we will have @xmath198\simeq\rho$ ] . it is the narrowness of the distribution @xmath196 , a measure of the quality of the quantum reference frame , that determines the degree to which one can recover the quantum information . we see that for bounded - size samples of alice s reference frame , the decoding map we have described achieves _ approximate error correction_. further on , we will show that the degree to which it deviates from perfect error correction is inversely proportional to the size of the quantum reference frame . recall that the `` measure and re - orient '' implementation of the recovery operation @xmath11 was inferred from the adjoint of the kraus decomposition @xmath199 of @xmath5 . we exhibited a different kraus decomposition of the encoding operation in eq . ( [ eq : krause ] ) . the adjoint of the latter provides a novel kraus decomposition of @xmath11 and therefore also a new way of implementing the recovery operation . we will refer to it as the `` extract from the relational subsystems '' implementation . we find that @xmath200 can be written as @xmath201\bigr ) \,,\ ] ] where we define @xmath202 \,,\ ] ] as a map from @xmath203 to @xmath44 . recalling the form of the encoding map @xmath103 of eq . ( [ eq : edecomp2 ] ) , we see that @xmath204 . this implementation of the decoding map @xmath11 differs from the `` measure and re - orient '' scheme in that it requires joint ( i.e. nonseparable ) operations on @xmath3 and @xmath1 . specifically , it is implemented via a joint unitary on @xmath40 followed by a trace on @xmath3 . finally , we highlight another decomposition of @xmath205 that will be useful to us further on . it is the one obtained by taking the adjoint of eq . ( [ eq : equsefulform ] ) , @xmath206 given eqs . ( [ eq : edecomp1 ] ) and ( [ eq : decodingdecomposition ] ) , the composition @xmath19 can be written as @xmath207 = \sum_{q\in q_{rs } } \mathcal{r}^{(q)}\circ\mathcal{e}^{(q)}[\rho]\ , . \label{eq : composition}\ ] ] substituting the expressions for @xmath103 and @xmath205 in eqs . ( [ eq : eq ] ) and ( [ eq : rq ] ) , we obtain @xmath207 = \sum_{q\in q_{rs } } \frac{d_q}{d_r } \mathrm{tr}_{\mathcal{k}^{(q)}}\bigl [ a^{(q)}a^{(q)\dag}\bigl ( i_{\mathcal{k}^{(q)}}\otimes\rho\bigr ) a^{(q)}a^{(q)\dag}\bigr]\ , . \label{eq : composition2}\ ] ] we now consider the two subsets of @xmath97 from sec . [ subsec : relsubsystems ] . in case a , where @xmath208 , the intertwiner @xmath109 is a bijective isometry , and consequently @xmath209 is the identity and @xmath210 = ( d_q^2/d_r ) \rho$ ] . therefore , in this case the quantum information is perfectly recovered by the decoding map . in case b , however , @xmath211 is a non - trivial projection on @xmath113 and the recovery is not perfect . we can express eq . ( [ eq : composition2 ] ) as @xmath212 = \bigl ( \sum_{q\in q_{rs}^{\mathrm{ok } } } \frac{d_q^2}{d_r } \bigr ) \rho \\ + \sum_{q\notin q_{rs}^{\mathrm{ok } } } \frac{d_q}{d_r } \mathrm{tr}_{\mathcal{k}^{(q)}}\bigl[p^{(q)}\bigl ( i_{\mathcal{k}^{(q)}}\otimes\rho\bigr ) p^{(q)}\bigr]\ , . \label{eq : composition3}\end{gathered}\ ] ] this is just an alternative kraus decomposition of the effective decoherence map of eq . ( [ eq : method2 ] ) . we have shown two very distinct ways of implementing one and the same decoding operation . if we describe the reference frame token @xmath3 as an ancilla , then what we have is an example wherein a single map can be implemented either by a joint unitary followed by a trace on the ancilla , or by a measurement of the ancilla followed by a unitary rotation on the system that depends on the outcome of the measurement . the existence of many different implementations of an operation is familiar in quantum information theory . for instance , griffiths and niu have made use of a similar multiplicity of possibilities for the optimal eavesdropping strategies in quantum cryptography @xcite . the multiplicity of ways of implementing a single operation is analogous to the multiplicity of mixtures that lead to the same density operator . two kraus decompositions of our @xmath7-invariant recovery operation differ in their transformation properties under the group : one is a @xmath7-covariant set of operators ( a continuous set in the case of a lie group ) and the other is a discrete set of @xmath7-invariant operators . similarly , a @xmath7-invariant density operator @xmath2 on a finite - dimensional hilbert space admits two sorts of convex decompositions : a spectral decomposition with a discrete number of @xmath7-invariant elements , and the decomposition induced by @xmath2-distortion of a g - covariant povm ( continuous if @xmath7 is a lie group ) @xcite . recognizing this multiplicity of convex decompositions and the fact that no particular decomposition is preferred has been important for resolving many conceptual confusions @xcite . furthermore , each decomposition may yield important insights . in quantum optics , for example , a poissonian mixture of number eigenstates is equivalent to a uniform mixture over coherent states with the same mean number but differing in phase . the decomposition into states with well - defined phase is particularly useful for making predictions about wave - like phenomena , such as interference experiments , whereas the number state decomposition is best for particle - like phenomena , such as determining number statistics @xcite . similarly , each of the two decompositions we have provided of our decoding operation provides some insight into our problem . the `` measure and re - orient '' scheme is clearly the most intuitive and demonstrates that joint operations on reference token and system are not necessary to implement our recovery map . the `` extract from relational subsystems '' scheme demonstrates that if bob begins by measuring the irrep of the composite of @xmath3 and @xmath1 , he learns whether the state was in a `` good '' irrep or not and consequently whether or not he has achieved a perfect decoding . this sort of post - selectively perfect decoding operation is discussed in the following section . thus far we have only judged decoding schemes by their average performance . it is also possible to say something about the best and worst case performance . the `` measure and re - orient '' scheme is not particularly interesting in this regard : one achieves precisely the same fidelity of recovery regardless of the outcome of the covariant measurement on the rf token , so that the best and worst case recoveries are equivalent to the average . on the other hand , in the `` extract from the relational subsystems '' scheme , we found that the fidelity of the recovery depends on the irrep of the composite of rf token and system into which the input state was encoded . furthermore , given that the decoding operation was incoherent over these irreps , it is always possible to make a projective measurement that distinguishes these . depending on the measurement outcome , one can achieve decodings with fidelities that are sometimes better and sometimes worse than the average . indeed , by enhancing the `` extract from the relational subsystems '' scheme with such a measurement , bob can achieve _ perfect _ decoding with some probability . specifically , if he finds one of the `` good '' irreps , @xmath162 , then @xmath103 is invertible and the decoding operation @xmath205 of eq . ( [ eq : rq ] ) recovers the quantum message perfectly . ( of course , if he achieves one of the `` bad '' irreps , @xmath213 , then he achieves a decoding that is worse than the average . ) recalling eq . ( [ eq : composition3 ] ) and making use of eq . ( [ eq : dr ] ) , the probability of perfect recovery is @xmath214 such a decoding scheme achieves post - selectively perfect error correction @xcite . it is akin to achieving unambiguous discrimination of a set of nonorthogonal quantum states @xcite . for this implementation of the decoding , note that bob must be able to store the quantum token of alice s reference frame coherently until the time when he receives the message systems . another point worth noting : if alice is sending a large number of systems and bob wishes to implement probabilistically perfect error correction on some subset of them , he must wait until he has collected all of the systems in that subset . the reason is that he must perform a joint measurement on the composite of these and the rf token . furthermore , after his measurement is complete , he has disrupted the state of the rf token and he can no longer achieve perfect error correction for any other systems . the tradeoffs involved in such postselectively perfect decoding schemes are an interesting topic for future research . finally , we can consider modifying the encoding operation rather than the decoding in a similar way . note that if , immediately after implementing her encoding operation , alice implements a projective measurement of the irrep of the composite of rf token and system , she can come to know whether a subsequent decoding operation will achieve a perfect recovery or not . in addition , if it happens that alice has a classical description of the quantum message rather than merely having a sample , then she can prepare the quantum state many times and only initiate transmission when her measurement finds one of the `` good '' irreps . in this case , the quantum message is perfectly encoded into a pure @xmath7-invariant state of the composite of system and rf token . such a scheme therefore achieves a relational encoding akin to the one presented in bartlett _ the precise connection of our results to the latter encoding is an interesting topic for future research ( as is the application of the mathematical tools developed here to the general problem of calibration - free communication schemes discussed in the introduction ) . the quantum state of a harmonic oscillator is always referred to some phase reference @xcite . in this example , we consider using one quantum harmonic oscillator ( a single mode ) as a phase reference for another , and investigate the effect of bounding the maximum number @xmath215 of excitations in the phase reference . specifically , consider the single - mode rf to be prepared in the bounded - size phase eigenstate @xmath216 where @xmath217 is the fock state with @xmath218 excitations . this state is of the form of our general state ( [ eq : chiribella ] ) for the case of @xmath219 u(1 ) . for the system , we consider a qubit encoded in the two - dimensional subspace spanned by @xmath220 and @xmath221 . note that the system we consider does not carry an irrep of u(1 ) , and in fact u(1 ) has only one - dimensional irreps . because our main result concerning the representation of the encoding map , presented in sec . [ subsec : relsubsystems ] , was only proven under the assumption that @xmath45 is an irrep , the u(1 ) example can not be presented as a special case of this result . nonetheless , we find the u(1 ) example to be in accord with the general result , suggesting that our theorem applies more generally . for simplicity , we consider a system prepared in an arbitrary pure state @xmath222 our results will directly extend to the mixed - state case via the linearity of convex combination . the overlap of the rf state @xmath223 with its rotated version is @xmath224 rotations in u(1 ) act on the qubit system state as @xmath225 evaluating eq . ( [ eq : method2 ] ) then gives @xmath226}{1-\cos \theta } \left(\begin{smallmatrix } |\alpha |^{2 } & \alpha \beta ^{\ast } e^{i\theta } \\ \alpha ^{\ast } \beta e^{-i\theta } & |\beta |^{2 } \end{smallmatrix}\right)\,.\ ] ] noting that @xmath227}{1-\cos \theta } & = n_{r}+1\ , , \\ \int \tfrac{d\theta } { 2\pi } \tfrac{1-\cos [ ( n_{r}+1 ) \theta ] } { 1-\cos \theta } e^{i\theta } & = n_{r}\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] which also gives the normalization , we have @xmath228 \ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath10 here denotes the u(1)-twirling operation ( the dephasing map ) . it follows that in the `` measure and re - orient '' scheme for decoding , regardless of the outcome of the measurement , the reduced density operator is with probability @xmath229 the state @xmath230 , while with probability @xmath231 it is completely dephased in the @xmath232 basis . the overall effect of encoding and decoding is to implement a partial dephasing . because the irreps of u(1 ) are all one - dimensional , we have @xmath233 and consequently , by eq . ( [ eq : edecomp1 ] ) , the encoding operation @xmath5 may be expressed simply as @xmath234 . by virtue of eq . ( [ eq : equsefulform ] ) , each operation @xmath235 may in turn be expressed as @xmath236\pi^{(n ) } \,,\ ] ] which evaluates for different values of @xmath237 as : @xmath238 the decoding operation has the form @xmath239 where @xmath240 . one easily verifies that @xmath241 maps @xmath242 to @xmath220 and @xmath243 to @xmath221 , so that @xmath244 \propto \begin{cases } \left\vert 0\right\rangle , & n=0 \\ \alpha \left\vert 0\right\rangle + \beta \left\vert 1\right\rangle , & 0<n < n_{r}+1 \\ \left\vert 1\right\rangle , & n = n_{r}+1\ , . \end{cases}\ ] ] the probability of the outcome @xmath245 is @xmath246 , of @xmath247 is @xmath248 , and of each of the other outcomes is @xmath231 . weighting the decoded states @xmath249 by these probabilities , we can verify that eq . ( [ eq : partialdephasing ] ) is recovered . in this particular example , taking the adjoint of the encoding operation as one s recovery operation is actually optimal . the proof is as follows . for @xmath250 , the recovery operation is perfect and consequently optimal . otherwise , the action of the encoding map is to measure the system in the @xmath251 basis and update it to one of two orthogonal states [ as can be inferred from eq . ( [ eq : u(1)encodingcases ] ) ] . it is a well - known result that the update map that maximizes the entanglement fidelity is simply the lders rule ( or projection postulate ) @xcite , and this is precisely what the composition of the encoding with the recovery operation achieves . the fact that the optimal recovery operation can be achieved using a `` measure and reorient '' scheme shows that having the classical resource of partially correlated reference frames that is obtained by this scheme is just as good as having the quantum reference frame token , at least for the purpose of optimizing average - case performance in decoding . this is a surprising result because one might have expected the quantum resource to always do better . finally , by implementing a projective measurement of the total number and post - selecting on finding @xmath252 , it is clear that bob can achieve perfect decoding . this occurs with probability @xmath253 for a cartesian frame , the relevant group is the rotation group . rather than @xmath254 to allow for spinor representations of the rotation group . ] the charge sectors ( irreps ) are labeled by a nonnegative integer or half - integer @xmath255 , and the irreps are @xmath256-dimensional with the standard basis @xmath257 . we bound the size of our reference frame token by bounding @xmath255 . recall that the fiducial state for the frame , eq . ( [ eq : chiribella ] ) , requires us to work in a subspace @xmath258 satisfying eq . ( [ eq : specialproperty ] ) . in the cartesian case , we are confined to @xmath255 values such that @xmath259 . we denote the largest such value by @xmath260 . ( as an example , for an even number @xmath237 of spin-1/2 particles , only the highest irrep , @xmath261 , fails to satisfy eq . ( [ eq : specialproperty ] ) , and consequently @xmath262 . see @xcite . ) for simplicity , we restrict our attention to integer values of @xmath260 ( similar results can be obtained if one also allows non - integer values ) . the fiducial state of the rf token is @xmath263 where @xmath264 the system is taken to be a spin-@xmath265 particle . because this is an irrep of su(2 ) , the general results of sec . [ subsec : relsubsystems ] apply . we choose the following parametrization of su(2 ) , @xmath266 describing a rotation by angle @xmath267 about the unit vector @xmath268 . let @xmath269 where @xmath270 is the fiducial rf state of eq . ( [ eq : spinchiribella ] ) . then @xmath271 where @xmath272 is the spin-@xmath255 irrep of su(2 ) , and @xmath273 $ ] are the characters of su(2 ) . these characters are independent of @xmath274 and @xmath275 . they are given by @xmath276}{\sin[\omega /2]}\,,\ ] ] using the following identity @xmath277}{2\sin[\omega/2 ] } = 1/2 + \sum_{k=1}^n \cos(k\omega)\,,\ ] ] we find that @xmath278(1+\cos\omega)}{\sin\omega(1-\cos\omega ) } \\ - 2 ( { j_r}+1)\frac{\cos[\omega({j_r}+ 1)]}{(1-\cos\omega)}\bigr)^2\,.\end{gathered}\ ] ] in terms of this parametrization , the su(2 ) invariant measure is @xmath279 where @xmath280 , @xmath281 , and @xmath282 . for the rotation @xmath283 on the qubit system in this parametrization , we have @xmath284 it follows that the composition of encoding and decoding maps , given by eq . ( [ eq : method2 ] ) , is @xmath285 \label{eq : su(2)method1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath10 is the su(2)-twirling operation ( which is completely decohering for a single qubit ) . next , we determine the precise nature of the relational subsystems where the quantum information is encoded . in this example , the multiplicity spaces play a key role . we begin by describing the group - induced structure of the hilbert spaces , both for the rf and the total system . under the action of the representation @xmath16 of su(2 ) , the hilbert space for the reference frame is decomposed as @xmath286 the joint system @xmath40 , consisting of the rf plus a spin-1/2 qubit , carries a collective representation @xmath287 of su(2 ) which can easily be determined using standard angular momentum coupling . for coupling a spin-@xmath255 irrep to a spin-1/2 irrep , we have @xmath288 . thus , the hilbert space of the joint system @xmath40 has a similar decomposition under the action of @xmath95 , given by @xmath289 the multiplicity spaces for the joint system @xmath40 are related to those of the rf as @xmath290 for simplicity , we consider the qubit state to be pure , expressed in the standard angular momentum basis as @xmath291 the encoded state within the @xmath292th irrep is @xmath293 to evaluate this expression , we first evaluate @xmath294 where we recall that @xmath295 is defined on the subsystem @xmath296 . therefore , the state ( [ eq : jmpurestate ] ) is an unnormalized vector on @xmath297 . we transform @xmath298 to a coupled basis using clebsch - gordan coefficients @xmath299 . in terms of the bases used in ( [ eq : spinchiribella ] ) and ( [ eq : spinqubitpure ] ) , we have @xmath300 we note that the states @xmath301 for @xmath302 ( @xmath303 ) form a basis of @xmath304 ( @xmath305 ) . it follows that the full set of states @xmath306 form a basis of @xmath297 . we have @xmath307 we use the following clebsch - gordan identity , @xmath308 to obtain @xmath309 we now consider two cases for @xmath292 separately . for @xmath310 , we note that the multiplicity space @xmath297 is unitarily equivalent to the tensor product of a spin-@xmath292 and a spin-1/2 system coupled to total angular momentum @xmath311 . that is , @xmath312 where @xmath313 carries an irrep @xmath292 of su(2 ) and @xmath152 denotes unitary equivalence . we explicitly define the bijective isometry @xmath314 via its adjoint action on a basis for @xmath315 as @xmath316 in terms of this new subsystem structure for the multiplicity spaces , we can express ( [ eq : intermediatestep ] ) as @xmath317 where @xmath318 is defined by eq . ( [ eq : spinqubitpure ] ) . it follows that the encoded state for an irrep @xmath292 where @xmath319 is @xmath320 \nonumber \\ & = \sum_{m =- j}^j \langle j , m| ( |e_{j_r } \rangle \langle e_{j_r}| \otimes \rho)|j , m\rangle \nonumber \\ & = \frac{2j+1}{d_r } a^{(j)\dag}\bigl ( i_{\mathcal{k}^{(j ) } } \otimes \rho \bigr ) a^{(j ) } \ , , \quad j < j_r+\tfrac{1}{2}\ , . \label{eq : usualjqubit}\end{aligned}\ ] ] because @xmath321 is bijective , ( specifically , because the set of states @xmath322 are orthogonal ) we find the qubit faithfully encoded into the relational subsystem whenever @xmath323 . however , for the result @xmath324 , the multiplicity space @xmath297 is exceptional ; see ( [ eq : su2multspacedirectsum ] ) . we can not factorize @xmath297 as in eq . ( [ eq : magicdecomp ] ) . nonetheless , we can still introduce a hilbert space @xmath325 which carries an irrep @xmath326 of su(2 ) and in terms of it we can define an isometry @xmath327 , by modifying eq . ( [ eq : intertwineraction ] ) to include only the @xmath328 term in the sum . this isometry is simply not surjective . it follows that the set of states @xmath329 are no longer orthogonal . therefore , the map @xmath330 is no longer invertible . the action of @xmath331 can be viewed as a projection of uncoupled states on @xmath332 onto the subspace of states which couple to total angular momentum @xmath260 . the probability assigned to each irrep @xmath292 is @xmath333 \nonumber \\ & = \begin{cases } \frac{(2j+1)^2}{d_r } \ , , & j < j_r+\frac{1}{2}\ , , \\ \frac{(2j_r+1)(j_r+1)}{d_r } \ , , & j = j_r+\frac{1}{2}\ , . \end{cases}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we note that these probabilities satisfy @xmath334 . the decoding map within each irrep @xmath292 takes the form @xmath335 \nonumber \\ & = ( 2j+1 ) \langle e_{j_r}| i_{\mathcal{m}^{(j)}_{rs } } \otimes ( \cdot ) |e_{j_r}\rangle \,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] for @xmath319 , eq . ( [ eq : usualjqubit ] ) gives @xmath336 for @xmath337 , we make use of eq . ( [ eq : exceptionaljqubit ] ) and find @xmath338\,,\end{gathered}\ ] ] where @xmath10 is the su(2)-twirling operation ( complete decoherence ) . averaging over the irreps with the weights given in eq . ( [ eq : probscartesian ] ) , we find the decoded state to be @xmath339\nonumber \\ & \qquad + \tfrac{(2j_r+1)(j_r+1)}{d_r } \bigl ( \tfrac{2j_r}{6({j_r}+1)}\mathcal{i } + \tfrac{(2j_r+3)}{3({j_r}+1)}\mathcal{g } \bigr ) [ \rho ] \nonumber \\ & = \bigl ( \tfrac{j_r}{{j_r}+1}\mathcal{i } + \tfrac{1}{{j_r}+1}\mathcal{g } \bigr ) [ \rho ] \,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] thereby verifying that eq . ( [ eq : su2effectivedecoherence ] ) is recovered . we note that our recovery operation is perfect in the non - exceptional irreps and therefore optimal there . in the exceptional irrep , the error incurred in recovery is at most twice that of the optimal recovery , as described in sec . [ sec : decoding ] , by virtue of being of the form of barnum and knill s approximate reversal . we leave it as an open problem to to prove whether this recovery is in fact optimal , or if not , to identify what form an optimal recovery map would take . post - selectively perfect decoding is achieved if bob implements a projective measurement that distinguishes the irreps and obtains @xmath340 . by eq . ( [ eq : probscartesian ] ) and eq . ( [ eq : drcartesian ] ) ( or by eq . ( [ eq : pperfect ] ) directly ) , we see that the probability for this to occur is @xmath341 a directional rf identifies only a single direction in space , as opposed to a full set of axes . such an rf is not associated directly with a lie group , but rather with a coset space . specifically , although su(2 ) may provide a group of transformations between all possible directional rfs , any one directional rf is invariant under u(1 ) rotations about its axis of symmetry ; the relevant coset is then su(2)/u(1 ) . because of this distinction , we expect this example to proceed differently from the other two . the distinction is immediately apparent because there is no obvious candidate for a fiducial reference state as in eq . ( [ eq : chiribella ] ) . instead , we take the directional rf to be in an su(2)-coherent state of size @xmath260 , so that the fiducial state is @xmath342 we consider a qubit system which is described relative to alice s local cartesian frame by the state @xmath343 where @xmath344 . note first of all that even if bob shared a classical reference direction with alice , her @xmath345 axis for instance , his description of the system is still related to alice s by a dephasing operation . the reason is that he _ only _ shares alice s @xmath345-axis , and so the rotation about @xmath345 that relates his local @xmath346-axis to hers is completely unknown . averaging over rotations @xmath347 yields the dephasing operation @xmath348 = \int_0^{2\pi } \frac{d\theta}{2\pi } r_z(\theta ) \rho r^\dag_z(\theta ) \\ = |\alpha|^2 |0\rangle \langle 0| + |\beta|^2 |1\rangle \langle 1|\,.\ ] ] consequently , if bob has a bounded - size token of alice s @xmath345-axis , his decoding will yield a state that approaches @xmath349 rather than @xmath2 as one increases the size of the token . define @xmath350 where @xmath351 . the encoding of @xmath2 relative to bob s local cartesian frame is the following state of the composite of rf token and system @xmath352 to decode , bob measures the covariant povm @xmath353 on the rf token and reorients the system accordingly . the net result is @xmath354 the effect of this map will be particularly simple given that @xmath270 is invariant under u(1 ) rotations about the @xmath355-axis . for this calculation , it will be easiest to use euler angles to parametrize su(2 ) : @xmath356 where @xmath357 $ ] . ( we note this parametrization is different from that used in sec . [ sec : cartesian ] . ) with this parametrization , @xmath358^{2{j_r}}\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] and thus @xmath359^{4{j_r}}$ ] . we can express @xmath360 as a @xmath361 matrix in the @xmath355-basis as @xmath362 and our qubit system in bloch vector notation as @xmath363 using the identities @xmath364 we find that @xmath365 \,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath10 is the su(2)-twirling operation , and @xmath366 is the dephasing operator defined in eq . ( [ eq : dephasing ] ) . first , we note that the rf token , consisting of only a spin-@xmath260 system , does not possess a multiplicity space . when coupling this spin-@xmath260 system to the spin-1/2 qubit , the resulting collective system is described by @xmath367 and does not possess any multiplicity spaces either . given that the fiducial state , eq . ( [ eq : fiducialdirection ] ) , is not of the form of eq . ( [ eq : chiribella ] ) , the derivation of eq . ( [ eq : edecomp1 ] ) is no longer valid . nonetheless , the encoding map defined by eq . ( [ eq : encodingdirection ] ) may still be written in the form of eq . ( [ eq : edecomp1 ] ) , namely , @xmath368 where @xmath369\,,\ ] ] which is of the same form as eq . ( [ eq : equsefulform ] ) . to see that this decomposition exists , simply express eq . ( [ eq : encodingdirection ] ) as @xmath370 where @xmath10 is the su(2)-twirling operation . then , using eq . ( [ eq : generaldecoherencedfulldfree ] ) and eq . ( [ eq : hdecomp_direction ] ) , we have @xmath371 \,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] which is equivalent to eqs . ( [ eq : qqq ] ) and ( [ eq : qqq2 ] ) . note that @xmath372 is still a map from @xmath44 to @xmath373 , but in this case @xmath374 , so that it maps density operators to scalars . specifically , @xmath375 we see that the encoding operation in this case can be described as follows : after adjoining the rf token to the system , destructively measure the total angular momentum @xmath376 of the composite and upon obtaining quantum number @xmath292 , reprepare the system in the associated su(2)-invariant state @xmath377 . the decoding operation defined in eq . ( [ eq : decodingdirection ] ) is clearly proportional to the hilbert - schmidt adjoint of the encoding operation . consequently , it admits a decomposition into irreps via the adjoints of eq . ( [ eq : qqq ] ) , namely , @xmath378 \,,\ ] ] where @xmath379 is a map from @xmath380 to @xmath44 . this is of the same form as eq . ( [ eq : decodingdecomposition ] ) . to determine @xmath381 , we calculate the adjoint of eq . ( [ eq : qqq2 ] ) and determine the normalization by requiring that @xmath382=1 $ ] for all @xmath292 . we obtain @xmath383 where @xmath384 . except for the constant of proportionality , this has the form of eq . ( [ eq : rqusefulform ] ) . it evaluates to @xmath385 [ which one could also infer by taking the adjoint of eq . ( [ eq : ejexplicit ] ) ] . consequently , the decoding operation may be described as follows : destructively measure the total angular momentum ( squared ) , @xmath376 , on the composite of rf token and system and upon obtaining quantum number @xmath386 , reprepare the system in one of the two states in eq . ( [ eq : rjp ] ) . the composition of encoding and decoding yields @xmath387 \,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] in agreement with eq . ( [ eq : effectivedecoherencedirection ] ) . we note that this coincides with the result obtained by poulin @xcite . this recovery operation is of the form of the approximate reversal operation described by barnum and knill @xcite and is therefore near - optimal in the sense described in sec . [ sec : decoding ] . although it is not itself the optimal recovery map , the latter is easy to find in this example and we do so presently . given that the only pure states of the system that one can hope to reconstruct in the limit of an unbounded rf token are the @xmath388 eigenstates , denoted here by @xmath389 and @xmath390 , it is natural to take as our figure of merit the average input - output fidelity equally weighted over these two input states ( because then one can achieve fidelity 1 in the limit of an unbounded rf token ) . the only information about the state of the system that is encoded in @xmath136 is encoded in the relative weights of its two su(2)-invariant terms . consequently , the optimal decoding operation must consist of a determination of @xmath292 followed by a repreparation of the system state . we make use of previous work on the optimal estimation of the relative angle between a spin-1/2 system and a spin-@xmath260 reference frame @xcite . these results show that a measurement of @xmath376 on the composite is in fact optimal for estimating whether the system state was @xmath389 or @xmath390 given a uniform prior over the two . it is also shown there that the posterior probabilities one ought to assign to these two states upon obtaining outcomes @xmath391 and @xmath392 are @xmath393 in order to optimize the fidelity , one must reprepare the state that is most likely given the outcome , so that one should reprepare @xmath389 given the ` @xmath394 ' outcome and @xmath395 given the ` @xmath396 ' outcome . @xmath11 falls short of this optimal recovery because , by eq . ( [ eq : rjp ] ) , it does not reprepare @xmath389 given the ` @xmath394 ' outcome ; instead , it prepares a mixed state reflecting bob s knowledge of the state given the measurement outcome . we thank robin blume - kohout , j .- c . boileau , matthias christandl and renato renner for helpful discussions . sdb acknowledges the support of the australian research council . rws acknowledges support from the royal society . pst acknowledges the support of the aif , icore , mitacs , and jsps . Abstract:
[ "typical quantum communication schemes are such that to achieve perfect decoding the receiver must share a reference frame with the sender . indeed , if the receiver only possesses a bounded - size quantum token of the sender s reference frame , then the decoding is imperfect , and we can describe this effect as a noisy quantum channel . we seek here to characterize the performance of such schemes , or equivalently , to determine the effective decoherence induced by having a bounded - size reference frame . we assume that the token is prepared in a special state that has particularly nice group - theoretic properties and that is near - optimal for transmitting information about the sender s frame . we present a decoding operation , which can be proven to be near - optimal in this case , and we demonstrate that there are two distinct ways of implementing it ( corresponding to two distinct kraus decompositions ) . in one , the receiver measures the orientation of the reference frame token and reorients the system appropriately . in the other , the receiver extracts the encoded information from the virtual subsystems that describe the relational degrees of freedom of the system and token . finally , we provide explicit characterizations of these decoding schemes when the system is a single qubit and for three standard kinds of reference frame : a phase reference , a cartesian frame ( representing an orthogonal triad of spatial directions ) , and a reference direction ( representing a single spatial direction ) ." ]
12,871
12,871
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: continuous state differential equations are a popular modeling choice for the chemical concentrations of biochemical reaction networks in several disciplines , including industrial chemistry and systems biology . however , differential equations should only be used to model chemical concentrations when the counts of the reactant species are high @xcite . when the multiplicity of the individual species is low , as is often the case in enzymatic and genetic systems , it is important to use a model with a discrete state space which tracks individual molecular counts . predictions pertaining to the long - term behavior of a particular system can change dramatically depending upon whether the system is modeled with differential equations or with a discrete state space . in particular , discrete - space models may exhibit an extinction event where none exists in the corresponding continuous state model . for example , consider the following chemical reaction network : ( c1 ) @xmath0 ; ( c2 ) @xmath1 ; ( c3 ) @xmath2 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c1 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c3 ) ; where the labels correspond to the enumeration of the reactions . the deterministic mass action model predicts an asymptotically stable steady state for a wide range of parameter values . however , for the discrete - space model with stochastic mass - action kinetics and @xmath6 , the state @xmath7 is the inevitable absorbing state regardless of parameter values . this extinction event can be achieved by reaction 3 occurring until the count of species @xmath8 is zero , at which point no further reactions may occur . several frameworks exist for tracking trajectories of discrete state chemical reaction systems , including those of continuous time markov chains @xcite and stochastic petri nets @xcite . in these settings , the admissible transitions between states are assumed to occur randomly at a known rate and the occurrence of each reaction instantaneously updates the system according to the stoichiometry of the associated reaction . analysis of such systems is typically conducted by generating sample trajectories ( through a stochastic simulation algorithm , e.g. _ gillespie s algorithm _ @xcite or the next reaction method @xcite ) , by analyzing the evolution of the probability distribution via kolmogorov s forward equations ( i.e. the _ chemical master equation _ ) , by characterizing the stationary distributions of the models @xcite , or by studying the stochastic equations for the model @xcite . the study of extinction events in discrete interaction models is well - established in population dynamics and epidemic modeling , but the corresponding study in systems biology has only recently gained widespread attention . in @xcite anderson _ et al . _ described a large class of systems for which an extinction event necessarily occurs in the discrete model . interestingly , this class of models had previously been shown to have a particular `` robustness '' when modeled with deterministic ordinary differential equations @xcite . in @xcite r. brijder utilized tools from petri net theory to further extend the scope of networks known to have extinction behavior , by relating a kernel condition introduced in @xcite to the @xmath9-invariants of the corresponding petri net . related recent work analyzing transient and post - extinction behavior in discrete chemical reaction systems can be found in @xcite . in this paper , we further develop a network - based approach to determining when discrete - space chemical reaction systems may exhibit an extinction event . our main results , theorem [ mainresult ] and corollary [ maincorollary ] , state that a chemical reaction network with a discrete state space exhibits an extinction event if there is a modified network , called the domination - expanded reaction network , on which a particular set of inequalities on the edges _ can not _ be satisfied . the conditions we present may be summarized as systems of equalities and inequalities and , like corollary 2 of @xcite , suggests computational implementation . such an implementation will be explored in further depth in a follow - up paper @xcite . we demonstrate the effectiveness of corollary [ maincorollary ] on several models , including a model of the envz - ompr signaling pathway in _ escherichia coli _ @xcite . the notation of the paper is drawn from _ chemical reaction network theory _ which has proven effective for relating topological properties of a network s reaction graph to its admissible qualitative dynamical behaviors @xcite . the notions introduced here may be equivalently defined in the context of petri nets , which we summarize in appendix [ appendixd ] @xcite . we also adopt the following common notation throughout the paper : * @xmath10 and @xmath11 , * for @xmath12 , we define @xmath13 , * for a set @xmath14 of indexed elements and a subset @xmath15 , we define @xmath16 , * for a subset @xmath15 , we define the complement @xmath17 , * for @xmath18 , we define @xmath19 if @xmath20 for each @xmath21 . we outline the background notation and terminology relevant to the study of _ chemical reaction network theory _ ( crnt ) . ( for further background , see martin feinberg s online lecture notes @xcite . ) the fundamental object of interest in crnt is the following . [ crn ] a * chemical reaction network * ( crn ) is given by a triple of finite sets @xmath22 where : 1 . the * species set * @xmath23 contains the species of the crn . 2 . the * reaction set * @xmath24 consists of ordered pairs @xmath25 where @xmath26 and where the values @xmath27 are the * stoichiometric coefficients*. we will also write reactions @xmath28 as @xmath29 . the * complex set * @xmath30 consists of the linear combinations of the species in . specifically , @xmath31 . the number of distinct complexes is denoted @xmath32 . + allowing for a slight abuse of notation , we will let @xmath33 denote both the complex itself and the complex vector @xmath34 . we assume an arbitrary but fixed ordering of the species , reactions and complexes . it is common to impose that a crn does not contain any self - loops ( i.e. reactions of the form @xmath35 ) . since this assumption is not used in our results , and since it is common to allow self - loops in petri net theory , we will not make this assumption here . the interpretation of reactions as directed edges naturally gives rise to a reaction graph @xmath36 where the set of vertices is given by the complexes ( i.e. @xmath37 ) and the set of edges is given by the reactions ( i.e. @xmath38 . the following terminology will be used . a. a complex @xmath33 is _ connected _ to a complex @xmath39 if there exists a sequence of complexes @xmath40 such that either @xmath41 or @xmath42 for all @xmath43 . b. there is a _ path _ from @xmath33 to @xmath39 if there is a sequence of distinct complexes such that @xmath44 . c. a maximal set of mutually connected complexes is called a _ linkage class _ ( lc ) while a maximal set of mutually path - connected complexes is called a _ strong linkage class _ ( slc ) . the set of linkage classes will be denoted @xmath45 while the set of slcs will be denoted @xmath46 . d. an slc @xmath47 is called _ terminal _ if there are no outgoing reactions , i.e. @xmath48 and @xmath49 implies @xmath50 . the set of terminal slcs will be denoted @xmath51 . a complex @xmath52 is called terminal if it belongs to a terminal slc , and a reaction @xmath53 is terminal if @xmath33 is terminal . e. a set @xmath54 is called an _ absorbing complex set _ if it contains every terminal complex and has no outgoing edges , i.e. @xmath55 and @xmath53 implies @xmath56 . a complex @xmath55 is called @xmath57-interior , and a reaction @xmath53 is called @xmath57-interior if @xmath33 is @xmath57-interior ; otherwise they are @xmath57-exterior . absorbing complex sets are a generalization of the set of terminal complexes of a crn , since they must contain , but may be strictly larger than , this set . note that the set of terminal complexes is a closed complex set of the crn , as is the set @xmath58 . we will be particularly interested in the case where @xmath57 is the set of terminal complexes , as this provides the foundation upon which our main results are built . to each reaction @xmath53 we associate a _ reaction vector _ @xmath59 which tracks the net gain and loss of each chemical species as a result of the occurrence of this reaction . the _ stoichiometric subspace _ is defined by @xmath60 the _ stoichiometric matrix _ @xmath61 is the matrix with the reaction vectors as columns . a crn is said to be _ conservative _ ( respectively , _ subconservative _ ) if there exists a @xmath62 such that @xmath63 ( respectively , @xmath64 ) . the vector @xmath65 is called a _ conservation vector_. conservative crns have the property that a particular linear combination of all species remains constant as a result of each reaction , while subconservative crns have a combination of species which is nonincreasing in every reaction . a common example is conservation in the overall amount of enzyme or substrates in a closed enzymatic system , but there need not be such a physical interpretation . we present three examples in order to illustrate definitions . [ example234 ] consider the following crn : ( c1 ) @xmath1 ; ( c2 ) @xmath2 ; ( ghost ) @xmath66 ; ( c3 ) @xmath67 ; ( c4 ) @xmath8 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c1 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c4 ) ; this crn has the sets @xmath68 , @xmath69 , and @xmath70 . the linkage classes are @xmath71 while the slcs are @xmath72 note that slcs may consist of singletons . the terminal slcs are @xmath73 the stoichiometric matrix is as follows : @xmath74.\ ] ] the stoichiometric subspace is given by @xmath75 , and there is the conservation vector @xmath76 . this conservation vector represents the fact that @xmath77 is constant . [ example235 ] consider the following crn : ( c1 ) @xmath8 ; ( c2 ) @xmath2 ; ( c3 ) @xmath67 ; ( c4 ) @xmath0 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c4 ) ; the set of terminal complexes is @xmath78 . there are several additional choices for absorbing complex sets , including @xmath79 and @xmath80 . the stoichiometric matrix is as follows : @xmath81.\ ] ] the stoichiometric subspace is given by @xmath82 . there is no vector @xmath83 for which @xmath84 , so the crn is not conservative or subconservative . [ example236 ] consider the following crn : ( c1 ) @xmath1 ; ( c2 ) @xmath8 ; ( c3 ) @xmath67 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c3 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c2 ) ; the stoichiometric matrix is as follows : @xmath85.\ ] ] there is no vector @xmath83 such that @xmath63 , so the crn is not conservative ; however , the vector @xmath76 has the property that @xmath86 so that the crn is subconservative . a discrete _ state _ @xmath87 is an element of @xmath88 and denotes the molecular counts of each species . we let @xmath89 denote the state where @xmath90 corresponds to the count of species @xmath91 at time @xmath92 . these discrete states evolve as follows : @xmath93 where @xmath94 and , for all @xmath95 , @xmath96 is the number of times the @xmath97th reaction has occurred up to time @xmath92 . there are several established frameworks for modeling the time - evolution of crns on discrete state spaces , including that of continuous time markov chains ( ctmcs ) and stochastic petri nets . we will not concern ourselves with precise dynamical details ; rather , we will focus on where trajectories may evolve in @xmath88 . for a similar treatment , see the paper of l. paulev _ _ @xcite . we will say that a complex @xmath98 is _ charged _ at state @xmath99 if @xmath100 for all @xmath101 . we will then say that reaction @xmath53 is _ charged _ at state @xmath99 if the `` source complex '' @xmath33 is charged at @xmath87 . note that a reaction is therefore charged at a state @xmath87 if the species counts are sufficient for the source complex of that reaction . we will be primarily interested in how trajectories @xmath102 move through the state space @xmath88 of subconservative crns . in particular , we will be interested in the long - term behavior . we therefore introduce the following terminology , which is adapted from the conventions of stochastic processes . [ recurrence ] consider a crn on a discrete state space . then a state @xmath103 * reacts to * a state @xmath104 ( denoted @xmath105 ) if there is a reaction @xmath53 such that @xmath106 and @xmath33 is charged at state @xmath87 . a state @xmath104 is * reachable * from a state @xmath103 ( denoted @xmath107 if there exists a sequence of states such that @xmath108 . a state @xmath103 is * recurrent * if , for any @xmath104 , @xmath109 implies @xmath110 ; otherwise , the state is * transient*. note that the state space of a subconservative crn is finite ( see theorem 1 , @xcite ) . for this classification of crns , therefore , the notion of recurrence introduced above therefore agrees with the notion of positive recurrence from the language of ctmc ( see @xcite ) . we now extend the properties of recurrence and transience of states to the complexes and reactions of a crn . further considerations on the recurrence properties of the slcs of a crn are contained in appendix [ appendixc ] . [ turnedon ] consider a crn on a discrete state space . then a complex @xmath52 is * recurrent * from state @xmath103 if @xmath109 implies that there is a @xmath111 for which @xmath112 and @xmath33 is charged at @xmath111 ; otherwise , @xmath33 is * transient * from @xmath87 . a reaction @xmath53 is * recurrent * from state @xmath103 if the source complex @xmath33 is recurrent from @xmath87 ; otherwise , @xmath53 is * transient * from @xmath87 . in plain english , a complex @xmath33 is recurrent from a state @xmath87 if , whenever the process can go from the state @xmath87 to the state @xmath113 , then the process can move from the state @xmath113 to some state @xmath111 where @xmath33 is charged . the following clarifies the type of behavior for crns on discrete state spaces in which we will be interested . consider a crn on a discrete state space . we will say that the crn exhibits : 1 . an * extinction event on @xmath54 from @xmath114 * if every complex @xmath55 is transient from @xmath87 . 2 . a * guaranteed extinction event on @xmath54 * if it has an extinction event on @xmath57 from every @xmath114 . consider the crn in example [ example234 ] . through repeated application of reaction @xmath5 , we can arrive at the state @xmath115 where @xmath116 . since this is a possible outcome from any initial @xmath117 , we have that this crn has a guaranteed extinction event on @xmath118 . notice that no reaction may occur after the extinction event . consider the crn in example [ example236 ] . notice that the reaction @xmath119 can not occur indefinitely since all other reactions in the crn preserve @xmath120 . it follows that the model has a guaranteed extinction event on @xmath121 . notice , however , that so long as @xmath122 the reactions @xmath123 and @xmath124 are both recurrent . an extinction event therefore does not necessarily imply that all reactions must cease . in this section , we motivate and present the main new constructions and theory of the paper ( theorem [ mainresult ] and corollary [ maincorollary ] ) . we introduce the following . [ complexdomination ] let @xmath125 denote two distinct complexes of a crn . we say that @xmath33 * dominates * @xmath39 if @xmath126 . we define the * domination set * of a crn to be @xmath127 the notion of complex domination was introduced by d. anderson _ et al . _ in @xcite as an adaptation of the notion of `` differing in one species '' introduced by g. shinar and m. feinberg in @xcite . the domination property was extended to slcs by r. brijder in @xcite where it was also shown that , for conservative crns , the domination properties give rise to a binary relation on the slcs of a crn whose transitive closure is a partial ordering on the slcs of the crn ( lemma 2 , @xcite ) . we consider further properties of transience and recurrence of slcs in appendix [ appendixc ] . we note that the definition of complex domination in definition [ complexdomination ] is consistent with @xcite but reversed from @xcite . [ example919 ] consider the crns from examples [ example234 ] , [ example235 ] , and [ example236 ] respectively . for the crn in example [ example234 ] , we set @xmath128 , @xmath129 , @xmath130 , and @xmath131 and have @xmath132 , @xmath133 , and @xmath134 . for the crn in example [ example235 ] , we set @xmath135 , @xmath129 , @xmath130 , and @xmath136 , and have @xmath137 and @xmath133 . for the crn in example [ example236 ] , we set @xmath128 , @xmath138 , and @xmath130 , and have @xmath139 and @xmath132 . the key construction of this paper is the following , which uses the domination relations @xmath140 to expand crns into larger crns we call _ domination - expanded reaction networks_. [ dominationnetwork ] we say that @xmath141 is a * domination - expanded reaction network * ( dom - crn ) of the crn @xmath22 if @xmath142 . furthermore , we say a dom - crn is * @xmath57-admissible * if , given an absorbing complex set @xmath54 of the dom - crn , we have : ( i ) @xmath143 , and ( ii ) @xmath144 implies @xmath145 . a dom - crn consists of the original crn with additional directed edges corresponding to some ( potentially all ) of the domination relations @xmath126 . note that the reaction arrows flow from the dominating complex to the `` smaller '' complex in the domination relation , i.e. @xmath126 implies we add @xmath29 . consequently , like reactions , we will denote domination relations as either @xmath28 or @xmath29 . a dom - crn is admissible if we do not add any reactions which lead to the absorbing complex set @xmath57 of the dom - crn . when applying definition [ dominationnetwork ] , we will commonly let the absorbing complex set @xmath57 coincide with the set of terminal complexes of the dom - crn . in such cases , we will say a dom - crn is simply _ admissible _ with the understanding that @xmath57 is the set of terminal complexes . note that a dom - crn is a crn in itself and therefore has associated to it all of the quantities and structural matrices given section [ crntsection ] . while a dom - crn in general may have different structural properties than the original crn , an important restriction is given by the following result , which is based on lemma 2 of @xcite . the proof is contained in appendix [ appendixa ] . [ terminallemma ] if a crn is subconservative , then for any dom - crn : ( i ) the slcs of the crn and the dom - crn coincide , and ( ii ) every terminal slc of the dom - crn is a terminal slc of the crn . we can interpret lemma [ terminallemma ] as saying that , for a subconservative crn , the addition of domination edges does not create new cycles between slcs since this would create new slcs . [ example920 ] consider the crn from examples [ example234 ] and [ example919 ] . recall that the crn is conservative , and therefore subconservative , so that lemma [ terminallemma ] applies . the maximal dom - crn is given by the following : ( c1 ) @xmath1 ; ( c2 ) @xmath2 ; ( c3 ) @xmath67 ; ( c4 ) @xmath8 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c1 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c4 ) ; ( c1 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath146 ( c3 ) ; ( c1 ) edge [ left ] node @xmath147 ( c4 ) ; ( c2 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath148 ( c3 ) ; where we have indexed the domination relations for clarity . as guaranteed by lemma [ terminallemma ] , the slcs of the crn and dom - crn coincide . notice that the terminal complex @xmath8 in the dom - crn above is terminal in the original crn , but that the terminal complexes @xmath77 and @xmath2 in the crn are not terminal in the dom - crn . notice also that this dom - crn is not admissible since the domination relations @xmath149 leads to the terminal complex @xmath8 . consider instead the subset @xmath150 which corresponds to the following dom - crn : ( c1 ) @xmath1 ; ( c2 ) @xmath2 ; ( c3 ) @xmath67 ; ( c4 ) @xmath8 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c1 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c4 ) ; ( c1 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath146 ( c3 ) ; ( c2 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath147 ( c3 ) ; this dom - crn is admissible since @xmath151 contains no domination edges which lead to the terminal complex @xmath8 . consider the crn from example [ example235 ] and [ example919 ] . recall that the crn is neither conservative nor subconservative . thus , lemma [ terminallemma ] stands silent . the maximal dom - crn is given by the following : ( c1 ) @xmath8 ; ( c2 ) @xmath2 ; ( c3 ) @xmath67 ; ( c4 ) @xmath0 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c4 ) ; ( c2 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath152 ( c3 ) ; ( c4 ) edge [ left ] node @xmath152 ( c1 ) ; we have that there is only one slc in the dom - crn , which is given by @xmath153 , so that the slcs of the crn and dom - crn do not coincide . we can see , therefore , that lemma [ terminallemma ] does not hold in general if we remove the subconservative assumption . the following concept is adapted from numerous sources in graph theory . trees have been used extensively in crnt @xcite and the related notion of arborescences factored in @xcite . [ forest1 ] consider a crn @xmath22 and a @xmath57-admissible dom - crn @xmath141 where @xmath54 is an absorbing complex set on the dom - crn . then @xmath154 where @xmath155 and @xmath156 is called an * @xmath57-exterior forest * if , for every complex @xmath157 , there is a unique path in @xmath158 from @xmath33 to @xmath57 . a @xmath57-exterior forest is a forest in the usual sense in graph theory after restricting to the @xmath57-exterior portion of the reaction graph of the dom - crn . note that definition [ forest1 ] places no restrictions on @xmath57-interior reactions . by convention , we will include such reactions in every @xmath57-exterior forest . if @xmath57 consists solely of the terminal complexes of the dom - crn , we say @xmath154 is simply an _ exterior forest_. we will be interested in particular in @xmath57-exterior forests which satisfy the following property . [ balancing ] consider a crn @xmath22 and a @xmath57-admissible dom - crn @xmath141 where @xmath54 is an absorbing complex set on the dom - crn . let @xmath159 . then a @xmath57-exterior forest @xmath154 is said to be * balanced * if there is a vector @xmath160 with @xmath161 for at least one @xmath57-exterior reaction which satisfies : 1 . supp@xmath162 supp@xmath163 and supp@xmath164 supp@xmath165 ; 2 . @xmath166 ; and 3 . for every @xmath167 where @xmath157 , we have @xmath168 where @xmath169 . otherwise , the @xmath57-exterior forest is said to be * unbalanced*. the third condition of definition [ balancing ] can be interpreted as saying that , for every @xmath157 , the weight of the outgoing edge in the @xmath57-exterior forest must be at least as large as the sum of all incoming edges . when taken together , the three conditions of definition [ balancing ] generate a set of equalities and inequalities on the edges of the dom - crn . this suggests a computational implementation , which is investigated in the companion paper @xcite . [ example921 ] recall the crn taken from examples [ example234 ] , [ example919 ] , and [ example920 ] and the admissible dom - crn from example [ example920 ] . this dom - crn admits several exterior forests , for example the following substructures in bold red : ( c11 ) @xmath1 ; ( c21 ) @xmath2 ; ( c31 ) @xmath67 ; ( c41 ) @xmath8 ; ( c12 ) @xmath1 ; ( c22 ) @xmath2 ; ( c32 ) @xmath67 ; ( c42 ) @xmath8 ; ( c11 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath170 ( c21 ) ; ( c21 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c11 ) ; ( c31 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath171 ( c41 ) ; ( c11 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath146 ( c31 ) ; ( c21 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath172 ( c31 ) ; ( c12 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c22 ) ; ( c22 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath173 ( c12 ) ; ( c32 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath171 ( c42 ) ; ( c12 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath174 ( c32 ) ; ( c22 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath147 ( c32 ) ; note that every nonterminal complex has a unique path to @xmath8 . we now check whether these exterior forests are balanced by definition [ balancing ] by checking equalities and inequalities on the vector of edges of the following form : @xmath175 note also that the stoichiometric matrix is given by @xmath176.\ ] ] 1 . in order for the left exterior forest to be balanced , it is required that we find a vector @xmath177 , @xmath178 , satisfying : @xmath179 we can choose @xmath180 so that this is balanced exterior forest . in order for the right exterior forest to be balanced , it is required that we find a nontrivial vector @xmath177 , @xmath178 , satisfying : @xmath181 substituting condition 1 into condition 2 gives @xmath182 which is inconsistent with the requirement from condition 3 that @xmath183 and at least one entry be nonzero . it follows that this is an unbalanced exterior forest . we now present the main results of this paper , which are inspired by theorem 1 and corollary 2 of @xcite . the proof of theorem [ mainresult ] is contained in appendix [ appendixb ] . [ mainresult ] consider a subconservative crn and a @xmath57-admissible dom - crn where @xmath54 is an absorbing complex set on the dom - crn . suppose that there is a complex @xmath157 of the dom - crn which is recurrent from a state @xmath184 in the discrete state space crn . then every @xmath57-exterior forest of the dom - crn is balanced . this result places restrictions on the structure of a subconservative crn that does not experience a guaranteed extinction event . we will be more frequently interested in when discrete extinction occurs , and therefore present the following corollary which follows immediately as the contrapositive of theorem [ mainresult ] . [ maincorollary ] consider a subconservative crn and a @xmath57-admissible dom - crn where @xmath54 is an absorbing complex set on the dom - crn . suppose there is a @xmath57-exterior forest of the dom - crn which is unbalanced . then the discrete state space crn has a guaranteed extinction event on @xmath185 . recall that an exterior forest is unbalanced if there is a set of equalities and inequalities on the edges of the dom - crn which can not be satisfied . the question of determining sufficient conditions for discrete extinction is therefore reduced to determining the feasibility of particular sets of equalities and inequalities . notice also that , even if a crn permits many @xmath57-exterior forests , it is sufficient for a single one to be unbalanced for an extinction event to follow . furthermore , the set of transient complexes corresponds to the set of complexes not in @xmath57 . note that this may contain terminal complexes in the original crn ( see example [ example920 ] ) . by convention , when applying corollary [ maincorollary ] , if no mention of an absorbing complex set @xmath54 is made , it is assumed to be the set of terminal complexes in the dom - crn . reconsider the crn analyzed in example [ example234 ] , [ example919 ] , and [ example920 ] . this crn is conservative , and in example [ example921 ] we showed that there is an admissible dom - crn with an unbalanced exterior forest . it follows from corollary [ maincorollary ] that the discrete state space crn has a guaranteed extinction event on the set of nonterminal complexes of the dom - crn . that is , from all states @xmath103 , there is guaranteed to be a time after which the count of the species is insufficient for any reaction from the complexes @xmath77 , @xmath2 , and @xmath67 to occur . this is consistent with our earlier observation that the state @xmath115 where @xmath116 absorbs all trajectories through repeated application of the reactions @xmath186 and @xmath124 . notice that this pathway consists of the true reactions in the unbalanced exterior forest . in this section , we consider a crn which was proposed as underlying the envz / ompr signaling pathway in _ escherichia coli _ in @xcite . this crn has been studied previously with a discrete state space in the papers @xcite where it was shown to exhibit a guarantee extinction event . we reconsider the crn here to demonstrate the process of applying corollary [ maincorollary ] and also to demonstrate the advantages of our approach . in particular , the graphical method of constructing @xmath57-exterior forests suggests the pathways to extinction in the crn . [ example1 ] consider the following reaction mechanism , which was proposed by g. shinar and m. feinberg as underlying the envz / ompr signaling pathway in _ escherichia coli _ in the supplemental material of @xcite : ( x1 ) @xmath8 ; ( x2 ) @xmath67 ; ( x3 ) @xmath187 ; ( x4 ) @xmath188 ; ( x4x5 ) @xmath189 ; ( x6 ) @xmath190 ; ( x2x7 ) @xmath191 ; ( x3x7 ) @xmath192 ; ( x8 ) @xmath193 ; ( x3x5 ) @xmath194 ; ( x1x7 ) @xmath195 ; ( x9 ) @xmath196 ; ( x1x5 ) @xmath197 ; ( x1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( x2 ) ; ( x2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( x1 ) ; ( x2 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( x3 ) ; ( x3 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( x2 ) ; ( x3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath199 ( x4 ) ; ( x4x5 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath200 ( x6 ) ; ( x6 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath201 ( x4x5 ) ; ( x6 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath202 ( x2x7 ) ; ( x3x7 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath203 ( x8 ) ; ( x8 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath204 ( x3x7 ) ; ( x8 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath205 ( x3x5 ) ; ( x1x7 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath206 ( x9 ) ; ( x9 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath207 ( x1x7 ) ; ( x9 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath208 ( x1x5 ) ; where @xmath209 , @xmath210 , @xmath211 , @xmath212 , @xmath213 , @xmath214 , @xmath215 , @xmath216 , @xmath217 . consider the admissible dom - crn with @xmath218 . the dom - crn may be graphically represented as : ( x1x7 ) @xmath195 ; ( x9 ) @xmath196 ; ( x1x5 ) @xmath197 ; ( x1 ) @xmath8 ; ( x2 ) @xmath67 ; ( x3 ) @xmath187 ; ( x4 ) @xmath188 ; ( x3x7 ) @xmath192 ; ( x8 ) @xmath193 ; ( x3x5 ) @xmath194 ; ( x4x5 ) @xmath189 ; ( x6 ) @xmath190 ; ( x2x7 ) @xmath191 ; ( x1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( x2 ) ; ( x2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( x1 ) ; ( x2 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( x3 ) ; ( x3 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( x2 ) ; ( x3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath199 ( x4 ) ; ( x4x5 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath200 ( x6 ) ; ( x6 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath201 ( x4x5 ) ; ( x6 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath202 ( x2x7 ) ; ( x3x7 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath203 ( x8 ) ; ( x8 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath204 ( x3x7 ) ; ( x8 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath205 ( x3x5 ) ; ( x1x7 ) edge node [ right = -0.1 cm ] @xmath206 ( x9 ) ; ( x9 ) edge node [ left = -0.1 cm ] @xmath207 ( x1x7 ) ; ( x9 ) edge node [ right = -0.1 cm ] @xmath208 ( x1x5 ) ; ( x1x7 ) edge [ above right = -0.15 cm ] node @xmath147 ( x1 ) ; ( x1x5 ) edge [ below right = -0.15 cm ] node @xmath146 ( x1 ) ; ( x3x7 ) edge [ left ] node @xmath219 ( x3 ) ; ( x3x5 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath220 ( x3 ) ; ( x2x7 ) edge [ right = -0.15 cm ] node @xmath148 ( x2 ) ; consider furthermore the following exterior forest : ( x1x7 ) @xmath195 ; ( x9 ) @xmath196 ; ( x1x5 ) @xmath197 ; ( x1 ) @xmath8 ; ( x2 ) @xmath67 ; ( x3 ) @xmath187 ; ( x4 ) @xmath188 ; ( x3x7 ) @xmath192 ; ( x8 ) @xmath193 ; ( x3x5 ) @xmath194 ; ( x4x5 ) @xmath189 ; ( x6 ) @xmath190 ; ( x2x7 ) @xmath191 ; ( x1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath170 ( x2 ) ; ( x2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( x1 ) ; ( x2 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath171 ( x3 ) ; ( x3 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( x2 ) ; ( x3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath221 ( x4 ) ; ( x4x5 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath222 ( x6 ) ; ( x6 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath201 ( x4x5 ) ; ( x6 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath223 ( x2x7 ) ; ( x3x7 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath203 ( x8 ) ; ( x8 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath224 ( x3x7 ) ; ( x8 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath205 ( x3x5 ) ; ( x1x7 ) edge node [ right = -0.1 cm ] @xmath206 ( x9 ) ; ( x9 ) edge node [ left = -0.1 cm ] @xmath225 ( x1x7 ) ; ( x9 ) edge node [ right = -0.1 cm ] @xmath208 ( x1x5 ) ; ( x1x7 ) edge [ above right ] node @xmath172 ( x1 ) ; ( x1x5 ) edge [ below right ] node @xmath226 ( x1 ) ; ( x3x7 ) edge [ left ] node @xmath227 ( x3 ) ; ( x3x5 ) edge [ right ] node @xmath228 ( x3 ) ; ( x2x7 ) edge [ right = -0.15 cm ] node @xmath229 ( x2 ) ; in the highlighted structure ( bold red ) , there is a unique path from every complex to the terminal complex @xmath188 . it can be seen directly that this exterior forest is unbalanced by noting that we need a vector @xmath230 , @xmath178 , which has support on a subset of the red highlighted structure above . to satisfy condition 2 of definition [ balancing ] , we need to satisfy @xmath166 . we can check that @xmath231 has the generators : @xmath232 \ker(\gamma ) \cap \mathbb{r}_{\geq 0}^r = \ { & ( 1 , & 1 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & \;0 , & \ ; 0 , & \ ; 0 , & \;0 , & \ ; 0),\\ & ( 0 , & 0 , & 1 , & 1 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & \;0 , & \ ; 0 , & \ ; 0 , & \;0 , & \ ; 0),\\ & ( 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 1 , & 1 , & 0 , & 0 , & \;0 , & \ ; 0 , & \ ; 0 , & \;0 , & \ ; 0),\\ & ( 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 1 , & \;1 , & \ ; 0 , & \ ; 0 , & \;0 , & \ ; 0),\\ & ( 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & 0 , & \;0 , & \ ; 0 , & \ ; 1 , & \;1 , & \ ; 0),\\ & ( 0 , & 0 , & 1 , & 0 , & 1 , & 1 , & 0 , & 1 , & 1 , & \;0 , & \ ; 1 , & \ ; 0 , & \;0 , & \ ; 0),\\ & ( 0 , & 0 , & 1 , & 0 , & 1 , & 1 , & 0 , & 1 , & 0 , & \;0 , & \ ; 0 , & \ ; 1 , & \;0 , & \ ; 1 ) \ ; \ ; \;\ } \end{array}\ ] ] the first five vectors correspond to reversible reaction pairs in the crn and so may be ignored . in order to obtain a nontrivial vector @xmath233 , we require @xmath234 . to build such a vector using the sixth vector yields a vector with support on @xmath235 while building it out of the seventh vector yields a vector with support on @xmath236 . neither of these options is consistent with condition 1 of definition [ balancing ] so that the exterior forest is unbalanced . it follows by corollary [ maincorollary ] that the discrete state space crn has a guaranteed extinction event , and that every complex except @xmath188 is transient . in fact , all trajectories are absorbed by a state where @xmath237 , @xmath238 , and @xmath239 for @xmath240 . this result was previously obtained in @xcite and also proved for a simplified crn in @xcite . the construction of the dom - crn , and computational implementation , is unique . this method also suggests a pathway toward extinction through the reactions in the unbalanced exterior forest . such a pathway was not apparent by the methods of either @xcite or @xcite . in this section , we provide further examples which demonstrate how to apply corollary [ maincorollary ] , and also demonstrate the necessity of several of the technical conditions required of the result . example [ example000 ] presents a crn which can be shown to have an extinction event for an absorbing complex set @xmath54 which is not the set of terminal complexes in the dom - crn . example [ example001 ] presents a crn which does not have a guaranteed extinction event , but which can be shown to have an unbalanced exterior forest if we do not insist on the underlying dom - crn being admissible . example [ example999 ] demonstrates that including condition 3 of definition [ balancing ] allows further classification of crns with extinction events than would be possible otherwise . examples [ example100 ] and [ example101 ] provide crns which show that the conditions of corollary [ maincorollary ] are sufficient , but not necessary , for a guaranteed extinction event to occur . [ example000 ] it is natural to wonder whether , when applying corollary [ maincorollary ] , there is an advantage to generalizing the set of terminal complexes to an absorbing complex set @xmath54 . to show that there is , consider the following crn : ( c1 ) @xmath0 ; ( c2 ) @xmath241 ; ( c3 ) @xmath242 ; ( c4 ) @xmath2 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c3 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c4 ) ; ( c4 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( c3 ) ; there are no domination relations so that the only dom - crn corresponds to the crn shown , and it is trivially admissible . the only exterior forest consists of all reactions . notable , it contains reactions 1 and 2 on the nonterminal component . we can easily determine that @xmath243 satisfies the conditions of definition [ balancing ] and therefore that this exterior forest is balanced . therefore , corollary [ maincorollary ] does not apply and we may not conclude that an extinction event occurs . consider instead taking @xmath244 . this set is absorbing and contains every terminal complex of the crn . the only exterior forest again contains all reactions but only reaction 1 is @xmath57-exterior . since there is no balancing vector @xmath245 for which @xmath246 , we may conclude by corollary [ maincorollary ] that there is a guaranteed extinction event on @xmath247 . in fact , we can see this directly since repeated application of reaction 1 will deplete @xmath8 and there are no pathways by which to replenish it . [ example001 ] it is natural to wonder whether it is necessary to insist on dom - crns being admissible . to show that removing this assumption from corollary [ maincorollary ] can lead to misclassification , consider the following crn : ( c1 ) @xmath0 ; ( c2 ) @xmath2 ; ( c3 ) @xmath67 ; ( c4 ) @xmath187 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c1 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c4 ) ; ( c4 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( c3 ) ; the crn has only the single domination relation @xmath248 . since the corresponding domination relation @xmath249 leads to a terminal component in any resulting dom - crn , we may not add it , so that the only admissible dom - crn corresponds to the original crn . suppose , however , that we do not insist on dom - crns being admissible . specifically , suppose we allow the following dom - crn : ( c1 ) @xmath0 ; ( c2 ) @xmath2 ; ( c3 ) @xmath67 ; ( c4 ) @xmath187 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c1 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c4 ) ; ( c4 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( c3 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath152 ( c3 ) ; the only exterior forest is given in bold red as follows : ( c1 ) @xmath0 ; ( c2 ) @xmath2 ; ( c3 ) @xmath67 ; ( c4 ) @xmath187 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath170 ( c2 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c1 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath171 ( c4 ) ; ( c4 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath250 ( c3 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath251 ( c3 ) ; notice that we have included the terminal reactions in the exterior forest . in order to be balanced , we must find a vector @xmath252 which is nonzero on at least one of the nonterminal reactions @xmath253 and @xmath254 , such that @xmath255 conditions 1 and 2 imply that @xmath256 so that @xmath245 is does not have support on the nonterminal portion of the dom - crn . it follows that the exterior forest is unbalanced . note , however , that corollary [ maincorollary ] remains silent since the presented dom - crn is not admissible . since all reactions of the discrete state space crn are recurrent whenever @xmath257 , this example highlights the importance of the assumption that dom - crns be admissible . [ example999 ] it is natural to wonder whether condition 3 of definition [ balancing ] is useful in classifying discrete state space crns with extinction events . to see that it can be , consider the following crn : ( c4 ) @xmath1 ; ( c5 ) @xmath0 ; ( c6 ) @xmath2 ; ( c4 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c5 ) ; ( c5 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c4 ) ; ( c5 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c6 ) ; there are no domination relations so the dom - crn coincides with the original crn . we have only the following exterior forest in bold red : ( c1 ) @xmath1 ; ( c2 ) @xmath0 ; ( c3 ) @xmath258 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above left = -0.15 cm ] @xmath170 ( c2 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ below right = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c1 ) ; ( c2 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath171 ( c3 ) ; in order for this exterior forest to be balanced , we need to have a vector @xmath259 , @xmath178 , which satisfies the following equalities and inequalities : @xmath260 condition 1 reduces condition 2 to @xmath261 , so that , combining with condition 3 , we have @xmath262 this can only be satisfied by @xmath256 and @xmath263 , which is a violation . it follows that the exterior forest is unbalanced and therefore , by corollary [ maincorollary ] , the discrete state space crn has a guaranteed extinction event on the nonterminal complexes @xmath77 and @xmath0 . note , however , that the vector @xmath264 satisfies conditions 1 and 2 of definition [ balancing ] . it follows that condition 3 of definition [ balancing ] allows furthermore classification of crns with extinction events than conditions 1 and 2 allow by themselves . note also that this crn is also not classified as having a guaranteed extinction event by corollary 2 of @xcite . [ example100 ] it is natural to wonder whether the conditions of theorem [ mainresult ] and corollary [ maincorollary ] are necessary as well as sufficient for a discrete state space crn to have an extinction event . to show that they are sufficient only , consider the following crn , which is simplified from the crn in eqn . ( 66 ) of @xcite and reproduced as eqn . ( 49 ) in the supplemental material for @xcite : ( c1 ) @xmath8 ; ( c2 ) @xmath67 ; ( c3 ) @xmath265 ; ( c4 ) @xmath266 ; ( c5 ) @xmath267 ; ( c6 ) @xmath268 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c4 ) ; ( c5 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c6 ) ; ( c6 ) edge node [ below = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( c5 ) ; the crn has a guaranteed discrete extinction event , since @xmath187 may convert into @xmath8 through reaction 3 , then @xmath8 may convert into @xmath67 through reaction 1 . this shuts down all reactions . to show that corollary [ maincorollary ] is incapable of affirming this extinction event , it is necessary to show that every @xmath57-exterior forest of every @xmath57-admissible dom - crn is unbalanced . we start by considering the terminal complexes and the set @xmath269 . this gives the following dom - crn : ( c3 ) @xmath265 ; ( c4 ) @xmath266 ; ( c5 ) @xmath267 ; ( c6 ) @xmath268 ; ( ghost ) ; ( c1 ) @xmath8 ; ( c2 ) @xmath67 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c4 ) ; ( c5 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c6 ) ; ( c6 ) edge node [ below = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( c5 ) ; ( c4 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath146 ( c1 ) ; ( c6 ) edge node [ below = -0.15 cm ] @xmath147 ( c1 ) ; this dom - crn is admissible and admits only a single exterior forest in bold red : ( c3 ) @xmath265 ; ( c4 ) @xmath266 ; ( c5 ) @xmath267 ; ( c6 ) @xmath268 ; ( ghost ) ; ( c1 ) @xmath8 ; ( c2 ) @xmath67 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath170 ( c2 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath173 ( c4 ) ; ( c5 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath171 ( c6 ) ; ( c6 ) edge node [ below = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( c5 ) ; ( c4 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath226 ( c1 ) ; ( c6 ) edge node [ below = -0.15 cm ] @xmath172 ( c1 ) ; this forest is balanced if we have a nontrivial vector @xmath270 + @xmath271 , @xmath272 , which satisfies the following : @xmath273 this can be satisfied by the vector @xmath274 . it follows that the forest is balanced , and since this is the only exterior forest for the given dom - crn , no conclusion may be reached as a result of corollary [ maincorollary ] . we now consider more general absorbing complex sets @xmath54 . notice that any potential @xmath57 which contains a subset of @xmath275 can be balanced by the @xmath245 above , with perhaps different support on @xmath276 . if @xmath277 , however , we must have @xmath278 in order for the dom - crn to be @xmath57-admissible . otherwise , we would have an edge in @xmath151 which would lead to @xmath57 . for @xmath278 , however , we have that @xmath279 and @xmath280 are terminal in the dom - crn and therefore @xmath267 and @xmath268 must be included in @xmath57 . this leaves @xmath58 which has an empty exterior forest . there are no other cases to consider , so we are done . it follows that every @xmath57-exterior forest of every @xmath57-admissible dom - crn is balanced . since the crn has a guaranteed extinction event , however , it follows that the conditions of corollary [ maincorollary ] are not necessary for extinction events in discrete state space crns . [ example101 ] to show that the gap raised in example [ example100 ] may not be easily overcome by structural considerations alone , consider the following crn : ( c1 ) @xmath8 ; ( c2 ) @xmath67 ; ( c3 ) @xmath281 ; ( c4 ) @xmath280 ; ( c5 ) @xmath194 ; ( c6 ) @xmath197 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c4 ) ; ( c5 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c6 ) ; ( c6 ) edge node [ below = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( c5 ) ; this is the crn in example [ example100 ] with @xmath187 replaced with @xmath188 in the reaction 2 , and @xmath188 replaced with @xmath282 in reactions 3 and 4 . examples [ example100 ] and [ example101 ] share significant structural data , including connectivity of paths , domination relations between complexes , and ker@xmath283 . taking @xmath284 gives the following admissible dom - crn : ( c3 ) @xmath281 ; ( c4 ) @xmath280 ; ( c5 ) @xmath194 ; ( c6 ) @xmath197 ; ( ghost ) ; ( c1 ) @xmath8 ; ( c2 ) @xmath67 ; ( c1 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath3 ( c2 ) ; ( c3 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath4 ( c4 ) ; ( c5 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath5 ( c6 ) ; ( c6 ) edge node [ below = -0.15 cm ] @xmath198 ( c5 ) ; ( c4 ) edge node [ above = -0.15 cm ] @xmath146 ( c1 ) ; ( c6 ) edge node [ below = -0.15 cm ] @xmath147 ( c1 ) ; we arrive at the same balancing equalities and inequalities ( [ conditions ] ) as example [ example100 ] , so that every @xmath57-exterior forest on this dom - crn is balanced . since the connectivity and domination relations are shared with example [ example100 ] , we can exhaust nontrivial @xmath57-admissible dom - crns in the same way , and we conclude that corollary [ maincorollary ] is inconclusive . in contrast to example [ example100 ] , this example does not exhibit an extinction event for most initial conditions . provided @xmath237 , @xmath285 , and any one of @xmath286 , @xmath287 , and @xmath288 is positive , every complex is recurrent . this analysis suggests that comprehensive conditions for extinction events must depend on further structural information than that considered in this paper . in this paper , we have presented novel conditions ( theorem [ mainresult ] and corollary [ maincorollary ] ) on the structure of a crn that are sufficient to guarantee that the corresponding crn exhibits an extinction event . the conditions presented generalize the dependence on terminal slcs in @xcite and @xcite , and also produces a system of equalities and inequalities which can be directly verified . our conditions have the additional advantage of being fundamentally graphical in nature and suggesting pathways to extinction . this work raises several promising avenues for future work : 1 . while corollary [ maincorollary ] gives sufficient conditions for discrete extinction , they are not necessary ( see examples [ example100 ] and [ example101 ] ) . this raises the question of whether there are structural conditions which are both sufficient and necessary for discrete extinction and , if so , which further structural components of the crn might be utilized in such a result . the conditions of corollary [ maincorollary ] consist of a system of equalities and inequalities . this suggests a computational implementation amenable , in particular , to the methods of linear programming . linear programming has already been used widely in crnt for verifying crns with desirable structural properties @xcite . this will be explored and utilized to characterize crns with extinction events in the companion paper @xcite . mdj and dfa were supported by army research office grant w911nf-14 - 1 - 0401 . dfa was also supported by nsf - dms-1318832 and mdj was also supported by the henry woodward fund . gc was supported by nsf - dms-1412643 . rb is a postdoctoral fellow of the research foundation flanders ( fwo ) . 10 david f. anderson . a modified next reaction method for simulating chemical systems with time dependent propensities and delays . , 127(21):214107 , 2007 . david f. anderson , daniele cappelletti , and thomas g. kurtz . finite time distributions of stochastically modeled chemical systems with absolute concentration robustness . available on the arxiv at arxiv:1604.03388 , 2016 . david f. anderson , gheorghe craciun , and thomas g. kurtz . product - form stationary distributions for deficiency zero chemical reaction networks . , 72(8):19471970 , 2011 . david f. anderson , german enciso , and matthew d. johnston . stochastic analysis of chemical reaction networks with absolute concentration robustness . , 11(93):20130943 , 2014 . david f. anderson and thomas g. kurtz . continuous time markov chain models for chemical reaction networks . in h. koeppl et al . , editor , _ design and analysis of biomolecular circuits : engineering approaches to systems and synthetic biology _ , pages 342 . springer , 2011 . david f. anderson and thomas g. kurtz . . springer , 2015 . falko bause and pieter s. kritzinger . . vieweg verlag 2 . aufl . , 2002 . balzs boros . on the dependence of the existence of the positive steady states on the rate coefficients for deficiency - one mass action systems : single linkage class . , 51(9):24552490 , 2013 . robert brijder . dominant and t - invariants for petri nets and chemical reaction networks . , 9211:115 , 2015 . gheorghe craciun , alicia dickenstein , anne shiu , and bernd sturmfels . toric dynamical systems . , 44(11):15511565 , 2009 . german a. enciso . transient absolute robustness in stochastic biochemical networks . , 13(121):20160475 , 2016 . martin feinberg . lectures on chemical reaction networks . unpublished written versions of lectures given at the mathematics research center , university of wisconsin . martin feinberg . complex balancing in general kinetic systems . , 49:187194 , 1972 . martin feinberg . chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal reactors : i. the deficiency zero and deficiency one theorems . , 42(10):22292268 , 1987 . martin feinberg . chemical reaction network structure and the stability of complex isothermal reactors : ii . multiple steady states for networks of deficiency one . , 43(1):125 , 1988 . michael a. gibson and jehoshua bruck . efficient exact stochastic simulation of chemical systems with many species and many channels . , 104:18761889 , 2000 . daniel gillespie . a general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions . , 22(4):403434 , 1976 . fritz horn . necessary and sufficient conditions for complex balancing in chemical kinetics . , 49:172186 , 1972 . fritz horn and roy jackson . general mass action kinetics . , 47:81116 , 1972 . matthew d. johnston . translated chemical reaction networks . , 76(5):10811116 , 2014 . matthew d. johnston . a linear programming approach to dynamical equivalence , linear conjugacy , and the deficiency one theorem . , 54(8):16121631 , 2016 . matthew d. johnston . a computational approach to extinction events in chemical reaction networks with discrete state spaces . available on the arxiv at arxiv:1701.02014 , 2017 . matthew d. johnston , casian pantea , and pete donnell . a computational approach to persistence , permanence , and endotacticity of chemical reaction networks . , 72(1):467498 , 2016 . matthew d. johnston , david siegel , and gbor szederknyi . a linear programming approach to weak reversibility and linear conjugacy of chemical reaction networks . , 50(1):274288 , 2012 . tom g. kurtz . the relationship between stochastic and deterministic models for chemical reactions . , 57:29762978 , 1972 . gregory f. lawler . chapman & hall , 2006 . grard memmi and grard roucairol . linear algebra in net theory . in wilfried brauer , editor , _ net theory and applications _ , volume 84 of _ lecture notes in comput . _ , pages 213223 . springer , 1975 . jost neigenfind , sergio grimbs , and zoran nikoloski . biochemical network decomposition reveals absolute concentration robustness . available on the arxiv at arxiv:1105.0624v1 . james l. peterson . petri nets . , 9(3):223252 , 1977 . wolfgang reisig and grzegorz rozenberg , editors . , volume 1491 of _ lecture notes in comput . _ springer , 1998 . loc paulev , gheorghe craciun , and keinz koeppl . dynamical properties of discrete reaction networks . , 69(1):5572 , 2014 . guy shinar and martin feinberg . structural sources of robustness in biochemical reaction networks . , 327(5971):13891391 , 2010 . gabor szederknyi . computing sparse and dense realizations of reaction kinetic systems . , 47:551568 , 2010 . * lemma [ terminallemma ] . * _ if a crn is subconservative , then for any dom - crn : ( i ) the slcs of the crn and the dom - crn coincide , and ( ii ) every terminal slc of the dom - crn is a terminal slc of the crn . _ _ proof of ( i ) : _ consider a subconservative crn and dom - crn . since the reactions of the crn are contained in the reactions of the dom - crn , it follows that the slcs of crn remain strongly connected in the dom - crn and therefore are contained in the slcs of the dom - crn . now suppose that there is an slc of the dom - crn which is not contained in any slc of the crn . it follows that there are slcs @xmath289 of the crn such that is a path in the dom - crn from some complex @xmath290 to some complex @xmath291 , and there is a path in the dom - crn from some complex @xmath292 to some complex @xmath293 . since @xmath294 and @xmath295 are strongly connected , we can create a cycle in the dom - crn by constructing a path from @xmath296 to @xmath297 to @xmath298 to @xmath299 back to @xmath296 . furthermore , since this is not a cycle in the crn ( otherwise , @xmath294 and @xmath295 would not be maximally strongly connected in the crn ) , we have that there is at least one reaction in this cycle which is from @xmath151 . we now index the complexes in the cycle so that , if there are @xmath300 reactions from @xmath151 in the cycle , we have the following segments in between these reactions : @xmath301 we take the segments above to be connected by reactions in @xmath302 . we also take @xmath303 and @xmath304 so that the endpoints of successive segments are joined together by @xmath305 . let @xmath306 denote the vector of counts of the reactions in ( [ cycle ] ) , and take @xmath307 . it follows that @xmath308 by the domination relations @xmath303 . since the crn is subconservative , it follows that there is a @xmath62 such that @xmath309 . it follows that we have @xmath310 \alpha = \mathbf{c}^t [ \gamma \alpha ] > 0\ ] ] where the last strict inequality follows from @xmath311 for @xmath312 and the observation that at least one component in ( [ 10 ] ) must be strictly greater than zero since the complexes of the crn are stoichiometrically distinct . this is a contradiction . it follows that such a cycle does not exist in the dom - crn so that @xmath294 and @xmath295 are slcs of the crn . the slcs of the crn and dom - crn therefore coincide and ( i ) is shown . + _ proof of ( ii ) : _ note that ( i ) guarantees that the crn and dom - crn share the same set of slcs which we will denote @xmath46 . suppose that @xmath47 is terminal in the dom - crn but not in the crn . this implies that there is a reaction @xmath25 where @xmath313 and @xmath314 ; however , this reaction is included in the dom - crn so that @xmath294 may not be terminal in the dom - crn . it follows that every terminal slc of the dom - crn is a terminal slc of the crn , and ( ii ) is shown . * theorem [ mainresult ] . * _ consider a subconservative crn and a @xmath57-admissible dom - crn where @xmath54 is an absorbing complex set on the dom - crn . suppose that there is a complex @xmath157 of the dom - crn which is recurrent from a state @xmath184 in the discrete state space crn . then every @xmath57-exterior forest of the dom - crn is balanced . _ the following proof is inspired by the proof of theorem 1 in @xcite . the notation has been adapted to that of crnt . consider a subconservative crn and a @xmath57-admissible dom - crn where @xmath54 is an absorbing complex set on the dom - crn . suppose that there is a complex @xmath157 of the dom - crn which is recurrent from a state @xmath184 . we will show that every @xmath57-exterior forest is balanced ; that is , every @xmath57-exterior forest admits a vector @xmath315 satisfying the requirements of definition [ balancing ] . we will accomplish this by constructing a sequence of reactions which may be executed indefinitively , and then demonstrating that this sequence repeats . we will define @xmath245 based on a specific repeating portion of this sequence and show that it is balanced . let @xmath103 denote our initial state . by assumption , there is a state @xmath316 and a complex @xmath317 such that ( i ) @xmath318 , ( ii ) @xmath319 is charged at @xmath320 , and ( iii ) no complex @xmath157 is charged at any state along the sequence of reactions from @xmath318 . that is , @xmath319 is the first @xmath57-exterior complex which becomes charged as a result of the reaction sequence . ( if @xmath319 is charged at @xmath87 then the sequence of reactions is empty . ) by construction , there is a unique path in the exterior forest from @xmath319 to @xmath57 . let @xmath321 denote the complex at the end of this path and @xmath322 denote the state obtained by the sequential occurrence of the true reactions in the path ( i.e. include reactions in @xmath323 but exclude domination relations @xmath324 ) . note that ( i ) @xmath325 , and ( ii ) @xmath326 is charged at @xmath327 . we now iterate this procedure for @xmath328 starting from the state @xmath329 rather than @xmath87 . this generates the following sequence of transitions , which may be continued indefinitely by the recurrence assumption : @xmath330 since the crn is subconservative , we have that there is a finite number of accessible states ( theorem 1 , @xcite ) . it follows that there is a state in @xmath331 which is repeated . we let @xmath332 and @xmath333 where @xmath334 denote the first and second indices for the set @xmath331 such that @xmath335 . this gives the following subsequence of ( [ stuff1 ] ) @xmath336 since @xmath335 , ( [ stuff2 ] ) defines a sequence of reactions which can be repeated indefinitely . we now define the vector @xmath160 in the following way : ( i ) @xmath233 consists of the counts of the reactions in the sequence of reactions in ( [ stuff2 ] ) , and ( ii ) @xmath276 consists of the counts of the domination relations in the paths taken to construct the reaction sequences in ( [ stuff2 ] ) . we now show that @xmath245 if balanced according to definition [ balancing ] . it is clear , first of all , that @xmath245 only has support on @xmath323 and @xmath324 so that condition @xmath3 is satisfied . in order to show that @xmath337 , we note from eqn . ( [ markov ] ) of the main text , and the definition of @xmath233 , that @xmath338 it follows that @xmath337 and therefore @xmath245 satisfies condition @xmath4 of definition [ balancing ] . to verify condition @xmath5 , we note that , since @xmath339 is always chosen to be the first complex exterior to @xmath57 which becomes charged , the only contribution to @xmath245 from the nonterminal component comes from the segments corresponding to @xmath340 , i.e. the paths from @xmath339 to @xmath57 . it follows that , at every complex exterior to @xmath57 , the count of the reaction out is at least as great as the sum of the reactions in , and @xmath245 therefore satisfies condition @xmath5 of definition [ balancing ] . the result is therefore shown . we define the following , which extends definition [ recurrence ] . consider a crn on a discrete state space . an slc @xmath47 is said to be * recurrent * from state @xmath103 if every @xmath313 is recurrent from @xmath87 ; otherwise , we will say @xmath294 is * transient * from @xmath87 . in other words , an slc is recurrent if every complex @xmath33 in the slc is recurrent . we now consider how the transient and recurrence of complexes may be distributed throughout a crn . [ lemma10 ] consider a crn on a discrete state space . then a complex @xmath313 is recurrent if and only if the slc @xmath47 is recurrent . let @xmath47 denote an slc of a crn . suppose @xmath313 is recurrent from @xmath103 and @xmath341 . from the recurrence of @xmath33 , it follows that , for every @xmath104 such that @xmath109 , there is a @xmath342 such that @xmath112 and @xmath33 is charged at @xmath111 . since @xmath33 and @xmath39 belong to the same linkage class , it follows that there is a path from @xmath33 to @xmath39 . it follows that there is a @xmath343 such that @xmath344 and @xmath39 is charged at @xmath345 . we have used the observation that reactions in a path in the reaction graph may occur in sequence since each reaction necessarily produces sufficient molecularity for the next reaction to proceed . we therefore have that @xmath346 so that , for every @xmath104 , such that @xmath109 , there is a @xmath343 such that @xmath347 and @xmath39 is charged at @xmath345 . it follows that @xmath39 is recurrent from @xmath87 , and we are done . this result shows that complex and slcs recurrent is equivalent in the sense that we may not have one without the other . we may further relate recurrence to the reaction graph of crn with the following . [ lemma1 ] consider a crn on a discrete state space and a dom - crn . suppose there is a path in the maximal dom - crn from a complex @xmath313 to a complex @xmath348 where @xmath349 are two slcs of the crn . then the following hold : 1 . if @xmath294 is recurrent from @xmath103 , then @xmath295 is recurrent from @xmath87 . if @xmath295 is transient from @xmath103 , then @xmath294 is transient from @xmath87 . the set of recurrent complexes is an absorbing complex set of the maximal dom - crn consisting of the union of slcs . let @xmath289 denote an slc of a crn and suppose @xmath294 is recurrent from @xmath103 . suppose there is a path in the dom - crn from a complex @xmath313 to a complex @xmath348 . it follows that , for every @xmath104 such that @xmath109 , there is a @xmath342 such that @xmath112 and @xmath33 is charged at @xmath111 . now consider the path in the dom - crn from @xmath33 to @xmath39 . the path may be composed of reactions in @xmath302 or @xmath151 . we have that , for any sequence of reactions in the path which are only from @xmath302 , if the path starts with a recurrent complex , recurrence is transferred to every complex in the path , including the final one . this can be realized by noting that the occurrence of each reaction necessarily confers sufficient molecularity for the next reaction in the path to take place . also notice that , for any reaction in @xmath151 , say @xmath350 we have @xmath351 for all @xmath352 . it follows that , if @xmath353 is charged at a state , then @xmath354 is charged at the state . combining these two results , we have that there is a @xmath343 such that @xmath344 and @xmath39 is charged at @xmath345 . it follows that @xmath39 is recurrent from @xmath87 . it follows that @xmath295 is recurrent from lemma [ lemma10 ] . this proves claim @xmath3 and , since claim @xmath4 is the contrapositive of claim @xmath3 , this is also shown . claim @xmath5 follows by noting that , if @xmath54 is the set of recurrent complexes but is not an absorbing complex set in the maximal dom - crn then there is a reaction @xmath355 such that @xmath356 and @xmath357 . it then follows from claim @xmath3 that @xmath358 is recurrent , which contradicts the construction of @xmath57 . since the set of recurrent complexes must consist of the union of slcs by lemma [ lemma10 ] , the result is shown . this result gives restrictions on the distribution of transient and recurrent complexes and slcs within a crn . recurrence travels with the direction of the paths in the dom - crn while transience travels against the direction of these paths . claim @xmath5 furthermore suggests that absorbing complex sets are the correct object of study when considering recurrence and transience in discrete state space crns . consider the following example . consider the crn structure contained in figure [ figure1 ] , where the boxes represent slcs . we write @xmath359 if there is a path from some @xmath360 to @xmath361 in the crn , and we write @xmath362 if @xmath363 for some @xmath360 and @xmath361 . in ( b ) and ( c ) , potential patterns for recurrent slcs consistent with lemma [ lemma1 ] are highlighted . if @xmath364 is recurrent , @xmath365 and @xmath366 must be recurrent as well ( red ) . if @xmath367 is recurrent , @xmath368 and @xmath369 must be recurrent as well ( green ) . note that in ( c ) this recurrence implication flows through the domination relationship . note also that lemma [ terminallemma ] guarantees that a subconservative crn may not contain any cycles in the representation figure [ figure1 ] . slcs . in ( b ) and ( c ) , two possible configurations of recurrent slcs ( red and green , respectively ) are presented which are consistent with lemma [ lemma1].,width=453 ] for subconservative crns , another way to interpret lemma [ lemma1 ] is by introducing the order operation @xmath370 on the slcs of a crn , where @xmath371 if there are @xmath313 and @xmath348 such that @xmath372 . in @xcite , r. brijder showed that the transition closure of this operator is a partial order on the slcs of a subconservative crn . we extend this slightly by defining the relation @xmath373 to be such that @xmath374 if either @xmath371 or there is a path from a complex @xmath348 to a complex @xmath313 in the crn , and then let @xmath375 denote the transitive closure of @xmath373 . since the relation @xmath375 corresponds to path - connectedness in the dom - crn , lemma [ terminallemma ] is equivalent to the property of @xmath375 being a partial order on the slcs of a subconservative crn . in this interpretation , the minimal slcs of the crn under the partial order @xmath375 correspond to the terminal slcs of the dom - crn . we may then interpret lemma [ lemma1 ] as stating that , for a subconservative crn with slcs @xmath349 such that @xmath376 , ( a ) if @xmath294 is recurrent from @xmath103 , then @xmath295 is recurrent from @xmath87 , and ( b ) if @xmath295 is transient from @xmath103 , then @xmath294 is transient from @xmath87 . that is , relative to the partial order @xmath375 on slcs of a subconservative crn , recurrence flows downward while transience flows upward . petri nets form a well - studied model of concurrent computation , see , e.g. , @xcite . petri nets are essentially . however , this difference is irrelevant for this paper . ] equivalent to crns on discrete state spaces . as a consequence , results concerning crns on discrete state spaces can be equivalently stated in terms of petri nets and vice versa . in a petri net ( without initial marking ) @xmath377 , species are called _ places _ ( i.e. , @xmath378 ) , reactions are called _ transitions _ ( i.e. , @xmath379 ) , and the stoichiometric coefficients of each reaction is encoded by a function @xmath380 . moreover , molecules are called _ tokens _ and states @xmath87 are called _ markings _ @xmath381 . furthermore , the stoichiometric matrix @xmath382 is known as the _ incidence matrix _ of a petri net , conservation vectors @xmath383 are known as _ @xmath384-invariants _ , and vectors @xmath385 such that @xmath386 are known as _ graphical depictions are different for petri nets compared to crns . for example , consider the following example . reconsider the crn from example [ example234 ] , which is represented graphically in figure [ fig : petri ] . in the setting of petri nets , species / places are denoted by circles and reactions / transitions by boxes . moreover , the reactants of a reaction / transition are the incoming edges of that transition ( including multiplicity as edge labels ) and the products of a reaction / transition are the outgoing edges of that transition ( including multiplicity as edge labels ) . the petri net has the incidence matrix : @xmath387 a @xmath384-invariant is given by the vector @xmath388 and @xmath9-invariants by the vectors @xmath389 and @xmath390 . Abstract:
[ "we study chemical reaction networks with discrete state spaces , such as the standard continuous time markov chain model , and present sufficient conditions on the structure of the network that guarantee the system exhibits an extinction event . the conditions we derive involve creating a modified chemical reaction network called a domination - expanded reaction network and then checking properties of this network . we apply the results to several networks including an envz - ompr signaling pathway in _ escherichia coli_. this analysis produces a system of equalities and inequalities which , in contrast to previous results on extinction events , allows algorithmic implementation . such an implementation will be investigated in a companion paper where the results are applied to 458 models from the european bioinformatics institute s biomodels database . [ section ] [ section ] [ section ] [ section ] [ section ] [ section ] * keywords : * reaction network , reaction graph , extinction , stochastic process , petri net * ams subject classifications : * 92c42 , 60j27" ]
13,985
13,985
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the study of topological phases of matter is one of the most vibrant directions of research in contemporary condensed matter physics . one core accomplishment has been the theoretical modeling and experimental discovery of two - dimensional topological insulators . @xcite the integer quantum hall effect ( iqhe ) was an early example of how states could be classified into distinct topological classes using an integer , the chern number , to express the quantized hall conductivity . @xcite in the iqhe , the number of delocalized edge channels is directly tied to the quantized hall conductivity through the chern number . more recently , it has been found that the symmetry under reversal of time acts as a protective symmetry for edge modes in ( bulk ) insulators with strong spin - orbit interactions in two and three dimensions , @xcite and that these systems are characterized by a @xmath0 topological invariant . the discovery of @xmath0 topological insulators has triggered a search for a classification of phases of fermionic matter that are distinct by some topological attribute . for non - interacting electrons , a complete classification , the tenfold way , has been accomplished in arbitrary dimensions . @xcite in this scheme , three discrete symmetries that act locally in position space time - reversal symmetry ( trs ) , particle - hole symmetry ( phs ) , and chiral or sublattice symmetry ( sls ) play a central role when defining the quantum numbers that identify the topological insulating fermionic phases of matter within one of the ten symmetry classes ( see columns 1 - 3 from table [ table : main table ] ) . the tenfold way is believed to be robust to a perturbative treatment of short - ranged electron - electron interactions for the following reasons . first , the unperturbed ground state in the clean limit and in a closed geometry is non - degenerate and given by the filled bands of a band insulator . the band gap provides a small expansion parameter , namely the ratio of the characteristic interacting energy scale to the band gap . second , the quantized topological invariant that characterizes the filled bands , provided its definition and topological character survives the presence of electron - electron interactions as is the case for the symmetry class a in two spatial dimensions , can not change in a perturbative treatment of short - range electron - electron interactions . @xcite on the other hand , the fate of the tenfold way when electron - electron interactions are strong is rather subtle . @xcite for example , short - range interactions can drive the system through a topological phase transition at which the energy gap closes , @xcite or they may spontaneously break a defining symmetry of the topological phase . even when short - range interactions neither spontaneously break the symmetries nor close the gap , it may be that two phases from the non - interacting tenfold way cease to be distinguishable in the presence of interactions . in fact , it was shown for the symmetry class bdi in one dimension by fidkowski and kitaev that the non - interacting @xmath1 classification was too fine in that it must be replaced by a @xmath2 classification when generic short - range interactions are allowed . how to construct a counterpart to the tenfold way for interacting fermion ( and boson ) systems has thus attracted a lot of interest . @xcite the fractional quantum hall effect ( fqhe ) is the paradigm for a situation by which interactions select topologically ordered ground states of a very different kind than the non - degenerate ground states from the tenfold way . on a closed two - dimensional manifold of genus @xmath3 , interactions can stabilize incompressible many - body ground states with a @xmath3-dependent degeneracy . excited states in the bulk must then carry fractional quantum numbers ( see ref . and references therein ) . such phases of matter , that follow the fqhe paradigm , appear in the literature under different names : fractional topological insulators , long - range entangled phases , topologically ordered phases , or symmetry enriched topological phases . in this paper we use the terminology long - range entangled ( lre ) phase for all phases with nontrivial @xmath3-dependent ground state degeneracy . all other phases , i.e. , those that follow the iqhe paradigm , are called short - range entangled ( sre ) phases . ( in doing so , we follow the terminology of ref . , that differs slightly from the one used in ref . the latter counts all chiral phases irrespective of their ground state degeneracy as lre . ) while there are nontrivial sre and lre phases in the absence of any symmetry constraint , many sre and lre phases are defined by some protecting symmetry they obey . if this protecting symmetry is broken , the topological attribute of the phase is not well defined any more . however , there is a sense in which lre phases are more robust than sre phases against a weak breaking of the defining symmetry . the topological attributes of lre phases are not confined to the boundary in space between two distinct topological realizations of these phases , as they are for sre phases . they also characterize intrinsic bulk properties such as the existence of gapped deconfined fractionalized excitations . hence , whereas gapless edge states are gapped by any breaking of the defining symmetry , topological bulk properties are robust to a weak breaking of the defining symmetry as long as the characteristic energy scale for this symmetry breaking is small compared to the bulk gap in the lre phase , for a small breaking of the protecting symmetry does not wipe out the gapped deconfined fractionalized bulk excitations . the purpose of this paper is to implement a classification scheme for interacting electronic systems in two spatial dimensions that treats sre and lre phases on equal footing . to this end , we use a coupled wire construction for each of the symmetry classes from the tenfold way . this approach has been pioneered in refs . and for the iqhe and in refs . and for the fqhe ( see also related work in refs . ) . to begin with , non - chiral luttinger liquids are placed in a periodic array of coupled wires . in doing so , forward - scattering two - body interactions are naturally accounted for within each wire . we then assume that the back - scattering ( i.e. , tunneling ) within a given wire or between neighboring wires are the dominant energy scales . imposing symmetries constrains these allowed tunnelings . whether a given arrangement of tunnelings truly gaps out all bulk modes , except for some ungapped edge states on the first and last wire , is verified with the help of a condition that applies to the limit of strong tunneling . we name this condition the haldane criterion , as it was introduced by haldane in his study of the stability of non - maximally chiral edge states in the quantum hall effect . @xcite we show that , for a proper choice of the tunnelings , all bulk modes are gapped . moreover , in five out of the ten symmetry classes of the tenfold way , there remain gapless edge states in agreement with the tenfold way . it is the character of the tunnelings that determines if this wire construction selects a sre or a lre phase . hence , this construction , predicated as it is on the strong tunneling limit , generalizes the tenfold way for sre phases to lre phases . it thereby delivers lre phases that have not yet appeared in the literature before . evidently , this edge - centered classification scheme does not distinguish between lre phases of matter that do not carry protected gapless edge modes at their interfaces . for example , some fractional , time - reversal - symmetric , incompressible and topological phases of matter can have fractionalized excitations in the bulk , while not supporting protected gapless modes at their boundaries . @xcite stated in a slightly more constructive way , we can think of our approach as ( 1 ) fixing , in a first step , a given desired edge theory at the boundary , and ( 2 ) continue , in a second step , by asking whether such an edge can be consistently defined with a set of symmetry - allowed periodic tunneling terms between wires which manage to gap out all other modes . alluding to a related strategy in philosophy , this is what we call wire deconstructionism of topological phases . the paper is organized as follows . we define the array of luttinger liquids in sec . [ sec : definitions ] . the haldane criterion , which plays an essential role for the stability analysis of the edge theory , is reviewed in sec . [ sec : conditions for a spectral gap ] . all five sre entries of table [ table : main table ] are derived in sec . [ sec : reproducing the tenfold way ] , while all five lre entries of table [ table : main table ] are derived in sec . [ sec : fractionalized phases ] . we conclude with sec . [ sec : discussion ] , where we allude to the generalization of our approach to additional symmetries , bosonic systems , and higher spatial dimensions . and @xmath4 , the scattering between them is forbidden by imposing locality in the limit @xmath5 . ( b ) periodic boundary conditions allow the scattering vector @xmath6 that gaps modes which were protected by locality before . , width=317 ] & @xmath7 & @xmath8&@xmath9 & & short - range entangled ( sre ) topological phase & long - range entangled ( lre ) topological phase + @xmath10 a & @xmath11 & @xmath11&@xmath11&@xmath12 & [ cols="^ " , ] + cii & @xmath13 & @xmath13&@xmath14 & & none & + [ table : main table ] we consider an array of @xmath15 parallel wires that stretch along the @xmath16 direction of the two - dimensional embedding euclidean space ( see fig . [ fig : boundaryconditions ] ) . we label a wire by the latin letter @xmath17 . each wire supports fermions that carry an even integer number @xmath18 of internal degrees of freedom that discriminate between left- and right - movers , the projection along the spin-@xmath19 quantization axis , and particle - hole quantum numbers , among others ( e.g. , flavors ) . we label these internal degrees of freedom by the greek letter @xmath20 . we combine those two indices in a collective index @xmath21 . correspondingly , we introduce the @xmath22 pairs of creation @xmath23 and annihilation @xmath24 field operators obeying the fermionic equal - time algebra [ eq : def hat psi s ] @xmath25 with all other anticommutators vanishing and the collective labels @xmath26 . the notation @xmath27 is used for the operator - valued row ( @xmath28 ) and column ( @xmath29 ) vector fields . we assume that the many - body quantum dynamics of the fermions supported by this array of wires is governed by the hamiltonian @xmath30 , whereby interactions within each wire are dominant over interactions between wires so that we may represent @xmath30 as @xmath15 coupled luttinger liquids , each one of which is composed of @xmath18 interacting fermionic channels . by assumption , we may thus bosonize the @xmath22 fermionic channels making up the array . to this end , we follow ref . . within abelian bosonization , this is done by postulating first the @xmath31 matrix [ eq : def mathcal k ] @xmath32 to be symmetric with integer - valued entries . because we are after an array of identical wires , each of which having its quantum dynamics governed by that of a luttinger liquid , it is natural to assume that @xmath33 is reducible , @xmath34 a second @xmath31 matrix is then defined by [ eq : def mathcal l ] @xmath35 where @xmath36 third , one verifies that , for any pair @xmath37 , the hermitian fields @xmath38 and @xmath39 , defined by the mandelstam formula [ eq : def hat phi s ] @xmath40 as they are , obey the bosonic equal - time algebra @xmath41= -\mathrm{i}\pi \left ( \mathcal{k}^{-1}_{\mathsf{a}\mathsf{a}'}\ , \mathrm{sgn}(x - x ' ) + \mathcal{k}^{-1}_{\mathsf{a}\mathsf{b}}\ , \mathcal{l}^{\,}_{\mathsf{b}\mathsf{c}}\ , \mathcal{k}^{-1}_{\mathsf{c}\mathsf{a } ' } \right ) . \label{eq : def hat phi 's b}\ ] ] here , the notation @xmath42 stands for normal ordering of the argument @xmath43 and the summation convention over repeated indices is implied . in line with eq . ( [ eq : def hat psi s b ] ) , we use the notation @xmath44 for the operator - valued row ( @xmath45 ) and column ( @xmath46 ) vector fields . periodic boundary conditions along the @xmath16 direction parallel to the wires are imposed by demanding that @xmath47 equipped with eqs . ( [ eq : def mathcal k])([eq : def hat phi s ] ) , we decompose additively the many - body hamiltonian @xmath30 for the @xmath48 interacting fermions propagating on the array of wires into [ eq : hat h bosonized ] @xmath49 hamiltonian @xmath50 even though quadratic in the bosonic field , encodes both local one - body terms as well as contact many - body interactions between the @xmath18 fermionic channels in any given wire from the array through the block - diagonal , real - valued , and symmetric @xmath31 matrix @xmath51 hamiltonian @xmath52 is not quadratic in the bosonic fields . with the understanding that the operator - multiplication of identical fermion fields at the same point @xmath16 along the wire requires point splitting , and with the short - hand notation @xmath53 , we interpret @xmath54 as ( possibly many - body ) tunnelings between the fermionic channels . here , we introduced the set @xmath55 comprised of _ all _ integer - valued tunneling vectors @xmath56 obeying the condition @xmath57 and we assigned to each @xmath58 from the set @xmath55 the real - valued functions @xmath59 and @xmath60 the condition ( [ eq : def mathcal t b ] ) ensures that these tunneling events preserve the parity of the total fermion number for the superconducting symmetry classes ( symmetry classes d , diii , c , and ci in table [ table : main table ] ) , while they preserve the total fermion number for the non - superconducting symmetry classes ( symmetry classes a , aiii , ai , aii , bdi , and cii in table [ table : main table ] ) . we emphasize that the integer @xmath61 dictates that @xmath58 encodes a @xmath62-body interaction in the fermion representation . our strategy consists in choosing the many - body hamiltonian @xmath63 defined in eq . ( [ eq : hat h bosonized ] ) so that ( i ) it belongs to any one of the ten symmetry classes from the tenfold way ( with the action of symmetries defined in sec . [ sec : representation of symmetries ] ) and ( ii ) all excitations in the bulk are gapped by a _ specific _ choice of the tunneling vectors @xmath55 entering @xmath54 ( with the condition for a spectral gap given in sec . [ sec : conditions for a spectral gap ] ) the energy scales in @xmath54 are assumed sufficiently large compared to those in @xmath64 so that it is @xmath64 that may be thought of as a perturbation of @xmath54 and not the converse . we anticipate that for five of the ten symmetry classes there can be protected gapless edge states because of locality and symmetry . step ( ii ) for each of the five symmetry classes supporting gapless edge states is represented pictorially as is shown in the fourth column of table [ table : main table ] . in each symmetry class , topologically trivial states that do not support protected gapless edge states in the tenfold classification can be constructed by gapping all states in each individual wire from the array . the classification is based on the presence or the absence of the trs and the phs that are represented by the antiunitary many - body operator @xmath65 and the unitary many - body operator @xmath66 , respectively . each of @xmath65 and @xmath66 can exist in two varieties such that their single - particle representations @xmath67 and @xmath68 square to the identity operator up to the multiplicative factor @xmath69 , @xmath70 respectively . by assumption , the set of all degrees of freedom in each given wire is invariant under the actions of @xmath65 and @xmath66 . if so , we can represent the actions of @xmath65 and @xmath66 on the fermionic fields in two steps . first , we introduce two @xmath71-dimensional matrix representations @xmath72 and @xmath73 of the permutation group of @xmath18 elements , which we combine into the block - diagonal @xmath31 real - valued and orthogonal matrices [ eq : def reps widehat theta and widehat pi ] @xmath74 where @xmath75 is the @xmath76 unit matrix and we make sure that @xmath72 and @xmath73 represent products of transpositions so that @xmath77 second , we introduce two column vectors @xmath78 and @xmath79 , which we combine into the two column vectors @xmath80 and the @xmath31 diagonal matrices @xmath81 with the components of the vectors @xmath82 and @xmath83 as diagonal matrix elements . the vectors @xmath84 and @xmath85 are not chosen arbitrarily . we demand that the vectors @xmath86 and @xmath87 are made of even [ for the @xmath88 in eq . ( [ eq : widehat theta and widehat phi square to pm1 ] ) ] and odd [ for the @xmath89 in eq . ( [ eq : widehat theta and widehat phi square to pm1 ] ) ] integer entries only , while @xmath90 and @xmath91 in order to meet @xmath92 and @xmath93 , respectively . the operations of reversal of time and interchanges of particles and holes are then represented by @xmath94 for the fermions and @xmath95 for the bosons . one verifies that eq . ( [ eq : widehat theta and widehat phi square to pm1 ] ) is fulfilled . hamiltonian ( [ eq : hat h bosonized ] ) is trs if [ eq : trs h ] @xmath96 this condition is met if @xmath97 the hamiltonian ( [ eq : hat h bosonized ] ) is phs if [ eq : phs h ] @xmath98 this condition is met if ( see appendix [ appendixsec : cond trs and phs ] ) @xmath99 the total number of fermions is a good quantum number in any metallic or insulating phase of fermionic matter . this is not true anymore in the mean - field treatment of superconductivity . in a superconductor , within a mean - field approximation , charge is conserved modulo two as cooper pairs can be created and annihilated . the existence of superconductors and the phenomenological success of the mean - field approximation suggest that the conservation of the total fermion number operator should be relaxed down to its parity in a superconducting phase of matter . if we only demand that the parity of the total fermion number is conserved , we may then decompose any fermionic creation operator in the position basis into its real and imaginary parts , thereby obtaining two hermitean operators called majorana operators . any hermitean hamiltonian that is build out of even powers of majorana operators necessarily preserves the parity of the total fermion number operator , but it might break the conservation of the total fermion number . by definition , any such hamiltonian belongs to the symmetry class d. the tool of abelian bosonization allows to represent a fermion operator as a single exponential of a bose field . in abelian bosonization , a majorana operator is the sum of two exponentials , and this fact makes it cumbersome to apply abelian bosonization for majorana operators . it is possible to circumvent this difficulty by representing any hamiltonian from the symmetry class d in terms of the components of nambu spinors obeying a reality condition . indeed , we may double the dimensionality of the single - particle hilbert space by introducing nambu spinors with the understanding that ( i ) a reality condition on the nambu spinors must hold within the physical subspace of the enlarged single - particle hilbert space and ( ii ) the dynamics dictated by the many - body hamiltonian must be compatible with this reality condition . @xcite the reality condition keeps track of the fact that there are many ways to express an even polynomial of majorana operators in terms of the components of a nambu spinor . the complication brought about by this redundency is compensated by the fact that it is straightforward to implement abelian bosonization in the nambu representation . we implement this particle - hole doubling by assigning to every pair of fermionic operators @xmath100 and @xmath101 ( whose indices we have been omitted for simplicity ) related to each other by the reality condition @xmath102 the pair of bosonic field operators @xmath103 and @xmath104 related by the reality condition @xmath105 invariance under this transformation has to be imposed on the ( interacting ) hamiltonian in the doubled ( nambu ) representation . in addition to the phs , we also demand , when describing the superconducting symmetry classes , that the parity of the total fermion number is conserved . this discrete global symmetry , the symmetry of the hamiltonian under the reversal of sign of all fermion operators , becomes a continuous @xmath106 global symmetry that is responsible for the conservation of the electric charge in all non - superconducting symmetry classes . in this way , all 9 symmetry classes from the tenfold way descend from the symmetry class d by imposing a composition of trs , @xmath106 charge conservation , and the chiral ( sublattice ) symmetry . hamiltonian @xmath64 in the decomposition ( [ eq : hat h bosonized ] ) has @xmath48 gapless modes . however , @xmath64 does not commute with @xmath54 and the competition between @xmath64 and @xmath54 can gap some , if not all , the gapless modes of @xmath64 . for example , a tunneling amplitude that scatters the right mover into the left mover of each flavor in each wire will gap out the spectrum of @xmath64 . a term in @xmath107 has the potential to gap out a gapless mode of @xmath64 if the condition ( in the heisenberg representation ) @xcite @xmath108= c^{\,}_{\mathcal{t}}(x ) \label{eq : locking condition}\ ] ] holds for some time - independent real - valued functions @xmath109 on the canonical momentum @xmath110 that is conjugate to @xmath111 , when applied to the ground state . the locking condition ( [ eq : locking condition ] ) removes a pair of chiral bosonic modes with opposite chiralities from the gapless degrees of freedom of the theory . however , not all scattering vectors @xmath58 can simultaneously lead to such a locking due to quantum fluctuations . the set of linear combinations @xmath112 that can satisfy the locking condition ( [ eq : locking condition ] ) simultaneously is labeled by the subset @xmath113 of all tunneling matrices @xmath55 defined by eqs . ( [ eq : def mathcal t a ] ) and ( [ eq : def mathcal t b ] ) obeying the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) @xcite [ eq : haldane conditions ] @xmath114 for any @xmath115 and @xmath116 pairwise for any @xmath117 . our first goal is to apply the wire construction in order to reproduce the classification of non - interacting topological insulators ( symmetry classes a , aiii , ai , aii , bdi , and cii in table [ table : main table ] ) and superconductors ( symmetry classes d , diii , c , and ci in table [ table : main table ] ) in ( @xmath118 ) dimensions ( see table [ table : main table ] ) . @xcite in this section , we will carry out the classification scheme within the bosonized description of quantum wires . here , we will restrict the classification to one - body tunneling terms , i.e. , @xmath119 in eq . ( [ eq : q - def ] ) , for the non - superconducting symmetry classes , and to two - body tunneling terms , i.e. , @xmath120 in eq . ( [ eq : q - def ] ) , for the superconducting symmetry classes . in sec . [ sec : fractionalized phases ] , we generalize this construction to the cases @xmath121 and @xmath122 of multi - particle tunnelings in the non - superconducting and superconducting symmetry classes , respectively . the topological stability of edge modes will be an immediate consequence of the observation that no symmetry - respecting local terms can be added to the models that we are going to construct . within the classification of non - interacting hamiltonians , superconductors are nothing but fermionic bilinears with a particle - hole symmetry . the physical interpretation of the degrees of freedom as bogoliubov quasiparticles is of no consequence to the analysis . in particular , they still carry an effective conserved @xmath106 charge in the non - interacting description . topological insulators in symmetry class a can be realized without any symmetry aside from the @xmath106 charge conservation . the wire construction starts from wires supporting spinless fermions , so that the minimal choice @xmath123 only counts left- and right - moving degrees of freedom . the @xmath124-matrix reads [ eq : def h for class a ] @xmath125 the entry @xmath88 of the @xmath124-matrix corresponds to a right mover . it is depicted by the symbol @xmath126 in the first line of table [ table : main table ] . the entry @xmath89 of the @xmath124-matrix corresponds to a left mover . it is depicted by the symbol @xmath127 in the first line of table [ table : main table ] . the operation for reversal of time in any one of the @xmath15 wires is represented by [ one verifies that eq . ( [ eq : trs on p and i ] ) holds ] @xmath128 we define @xmath54 by choosing @xmath129 scattering vectors , whereby , for any @xmath130 , [ eq : def h of t for class a ] @xmath131 with @xmath17 and @xmath132 . in other words , @xmath133 for @xmath134 . intent on helping with the interpretation of the tunneling vectors , we use the @xmath135 s in eq . ( [ eq : def h of t for class a e ] ) to compartmentalize the elements within a given wire . henceforth , there are @xmath123 vector components within each pair of @xmath135 s that encode the @xmath123 degrees of freedom within a given wire . the @xmath136th scattering vector ( [ eq : def h of t for class a e ] ) labels a one - body interaction in the fermion representation that fulfills eq . ( [ eq : def mathcal t b ] ) and breaks trs , since the scattering vector @xmath137 is mapped into the scattering vector @xmath138 by the permutation @xmath72 that represents reversal of time in a wire by exchanging right- with left - movers . for any @xmath130 , we also introduce the amplitude @xmath139 and the phase @xmath140 according to eqs . ( [ eq : trs h d ] ) and ( [ eq : trs h e ] ) , respectively . the choices for the amplitude ( [ eq : def h of t for class a f ] ) and the phase ( [ eq : def h of t for class a g ] ) are arbitrary . in particular the amplitude ( [ eq : def h of t for class a f ] ) can be chosen to be sufficiently large so that it is @xmath64 that may be thought of as a perturbation of @xmath54 and not the converse . one verifies that all @xmath129 scattering vectors ( [ eq : def h of t for class a d ] ) satisfy the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) , i.e. , @xmath141 correspondingly , the term @xmath54 gaps out @xmath142 of the @xmath143 gapless modes of @xmath64 . two modes of opposite chirality that propagate along the first and last wire , respectively , remain in the low energy sector of the theory . these edge states are localized on wire @xmath144 and @xmath145 , respectively , for their overlaps with the gapped states from the bulk decay exponentially fast as a function of the distance away from the first and end wires . the energy splitting between the edge state localized on wire @xmath144 and the one localized on wire @xmath145 that is brought about by the bulk states vanishes exponentially fast with increasing @xmath15 . two gapless edge states with opposite chiralities emerge in the two - dimensional limit @xmath5 . at energies much lower than the bulk gap , the effective @xmath33-matrix for the edge modes is @xmath146 here , @xmath147 follows from replacing the entries in the @xmath148 @xmath33 matrix for all gapped modes by 0 . the pictorial representation of the topological phase in the symmetry class a with one chiral edge state per end wire through the wire construction is shown on the first row and fourth column of table [ table : main table ] . the generalization to an arbitrary number @xmath149 of gapless edge states sharing a given chirality on the first wire that is opposite to that of the last wire is the following . we enlarge @xmath123 to @xmath150 by making @xmath149 identical copies of the model depicted in the first row and fourth column of table [ table : main table ] . the stability of the @xmath149 chiral gapless edge states in wire @xmath151 and wire @xmath15 is guaranteed because back - scattering among these gapless edges state is not allowed kinematically within wire @xmath151 or within wire @xmath15 , while back - scattering across the bulk is exponentially suppressed for @xmath15 large by locality and the gap in the bulk . the number of robust gapless edge states of a given chirality is thus integer . this is the reason why @xmath1 is found in the third column on the first line of table [ table : main table ] . it is imperative to ask whether the phases that we constructed so far exhaust all possible sre phases in the symmetry class a. by demanding that one - body interactions are dominant over many - body interactions , we have constructed all phases from the ( exhaustive ) classification for non - interacting fermions in class a and only those . in these phases , the same topological invariant controls the hall and the thermal conductivities . however , it was observed that interacting fermion systems can host additional sre phases in the symmetry class a where this connection is lost . @xcite these phases are characterized by an edge that includes charge - neutral chiral modes . while such modes contribute to the quantized energy transport ( i.e. , the thermal hall conductivity ) , they do not contribute to the quantized charge transport ( i.e. , the charge hall conductivity ) . by considering the thermal and charge hall conductivity as two independent quantized topological responses , this enlarges the classification of spt phases in the symmetry class a to @xmath152 . starting from identical fermions of charge @xmath153 , we now construct an explicit wire model that stabilizes a sre phase of matter in the symmetry class a carrying a non - vanishing hall conductivity but a vanishing thermal hall conductivity . in order to build a wire - construction of such a strongly interacting sre phase in the symmetry class a , we group three spinless electronic wires into one unit cell , i.e. , @xmath154 it will be useful to arrange the charges @xmath155 measured in units of the electron charge @xmath153 for each of the modes @xmath156 , @xmath20 , into a vector @xmath157 the physical meaning of the tunneling vectors ( interactions ) that we define below is most transparent , if we employ the following linear transformation on the bosonic field variables [ eq : trasf for fields phi a ] @xmath158 where @xmath159 is a @xmath31 block - diagonal matrix with the block @xmath160 having integer entries and unit determinant . the transformation @xmath160 that we employ is given by @xmath161 it brings @xmath124 to the form @xmath162 as we can read off from eq . , the parity of @xmath163 determines the self - statistics of particles of type @xmath164 . as eq is form invariant under the transformation ( [ eq : trasf for fields phi a ] ) , we conclude that , with the choice , the transformed modes @xmath132 as well as the modes @xmath165 are pairs of bosonic degrees of freedom , while the third and fourth mode remain fermonic . furthermore , the charges transported by the transformed modes @xmath166 are given by @xmath167 we may then define the charge - conserving tunneling vectors @xmath168 using eq . ( [ eq : t tilde if one wants to get bosons out of fermions ] ) , these tunneling vectors can readily be rewritten in the original electronic degrees of freedom . these tunneling vectors gap all modes in the bulk and the remaining gapless edge modes on the left edge are @xmath169 the only charge - conserving tunneling vector that could gap out this effective edge theory , @xmath170 , is not compatible with haldane s criterion . we conclude that the edge theory is stable against charge conserving perturbations . the hall conductivity supported by this edge theory is given by @xmath171 in units of @xmath172 . this is the minimal hall conductivity of a sre phase of bosons , if each boson is interpreted as a pair of electrons carrying the electronic charge @xmath173 . @xcite on the other hand , the edge theory supports two modes with opposite chiralities , for the symmetric matrix @xmath174 has the pair of eigenvalues @xmath175 . thus , the net energy transported along the left edge , and with it the thermal hall conductivity , vanishes . topological insulators in symmetry class aii can be realized by demanding that @xmath106 charge conservation holds and that trs with @xmath176 holds . the wire construction starts from wires supporting spin-@xmath19 fermions because @xmath176 , so that the minimal choice @xmath177 counts two pairs of kramers degenerate left- and right - moving degrees of freedom carrying opposite spin projections on the spin quantization axis , i.e. , two pairs of kramers degenerate helical modes . the @xmath124-matrix reads [ eq : def h of v for class aii ] @xmath178 the entries in the @xmath124-matrix represent , from left to right , a right - moving particle with spin up , a left - moving particle with spin down , a left - moving particle with spin up , and a right - moving particle with spin down . the operation for reversal of time in any one of the @xmath15 wires is represented by [ one verifies that eq . ( [ eq : trs on p and i ] ) holds ] @xmath179 we define @xmath64 by choosing any symmetric @xmath180 matrix @xmath181 that obeys @xmath182 we define @xmath183 by choosing @xmath142 scattering vectors as follows . for any @xmath130 , we introduce the pair of scattering vectors @xmath184 and @xmath185 the scattering vector ( [ eq : def h of t for class aii d ] ) labels a one - body interaction in the fermion representation that fulfills eq . ( [ eq : def mathcal t b ] ) . it scatters a left mover with spin up from wire @xmath136 into a right mover with spin up in wire @xmath186 . for any @xmath130 , we also introduce the pair of amplitudes @xmath187 and the pair of phases @xmath188 according to eqs . ( [ eq : trs h d ] ) and ( [ eq : trs h e ] ) , respectively . the choices for the amplitude ( [ eq : def h of t for class aii f ] ) and the phase ( [ eq : def h of t for class aii g ] ) are arbitrary . the subscript so refers to the intrinsic spin - orbit coupling . the rational for using it shall be shortly explained . one verifies that all @xmath142 scattering vectors ( [ eq : def h of t for class aii c ] ) and ( [ eq : def h of t for class aii d ] ) satisfy the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) , i.e. , @xmath189 for @xmath190 . correspondingly , the term @xmath183 gaps out @xmath191 of the @xmath192 gapless modes of @xmath64 . two pairs of kramers degenerate helical edge states that propagate along the first and last wire , respectively , remain in the low energy sector of the theory . these edge states are localized on wire @xmath144 and @xmath145 , respectively , for their overlaps with the gapped states from the bulk decay exponentially fast as a function of the distance away from the first and end wires . the energy splitting between the edge state localized on wire @xmath144 and wire @xmath145 brought about by the bulk states vanishes exponentially fast with increasing @xmath15 . two pairs of gapless kramers degenerate helical edge states emerge in the two - dimensional limit @xmath5 . at energies much lower than the bulk gap , the effective @xmath33-matrix for the two pairs of helical edge modes is @xmath193 here , @xmath147 follows from replacing the entries in the @xmath194 @xmath33 matrix for all gapped modes by 0 . we are going to show that the effective scattering vector @xmath195 with the potential to gap out the pair of kramers degenerate helical edge modes on wire @xmath144 since it fulfills the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) , is not allowed by trs . @xcite on the one hand , @xmath196 maps to itself under reversal of time , @xmath197 on the other hand , @xmath198 therefore , the condition ( [ eq : trs h e ] ) for @xmath196 to be a trs perturbation is not met , for the phase @xmath199 associated to @xmath196 then obeys @xmath200 a condition that can not be satisfied . had we imposed a trs with @xmath201 instead of @xmath202 as is suited for the symmetry class ai that describes spinless fermions with trs , we would only need to replace @xmath84 in eq . ( [ eq : def h of v for class aii b ] ) by the null vector . if so , the scattering vector ( [ eq : def t eff aii ] ) is compatible with trs since the condition ( [ eq : trs h e ] ) for trs then becomes @xmath203 instead of eq . ( [ eq : trs condition on alpha teff class aii ] ) . this is the reason why symmetry class ai is always topologically trivial in two - dimensional space from the point of view of the wire construction . note also that if we would not insist on the condition of charge neutrality ( [ eq : def mathcal t b ] ) , the tunneling vector @xmath204 that satisfies the haldane criterion and is compatible with trs could gap out the kramers degenerate pair of helical edge states . to address the question of what happens if we change @xmath177 to @xmath205 with @xmath149 any strictly positive integer in each wire from the array , we consider , without loss of generality as we shall see , the case of @xmath206 . to this end , it suffices to repeat all the steps that lead to eq . ( [ eq : def t eff aii ] ) , except for the change @xmath207 and @xmath208 are compatible with the condition that trs holds in that the pair is a closed set under reversal of time , @xmath209 one verifies that these scattering vectors fulfill the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) . consequently , inclusion in @xmath183 of the two cosine potentials with @xmath210 and @xmath211 entering in their arguments , respectively , gaps out the pair of kramers degenerate helical modes on wire @xmath144 . the same treatment of the wire @xmath145 leads to the conclusion that trs does not protect the gapless pairs of kramers degenerate edge states from perturbations when @xmath206 . the generalization to @xmath205 channels is that it is only when @xmath149 is odd that a pair of kramers degenerate helical edge modes is robust to the most generic @xmath183 of the form depicted in the fourth column on line 3 of table [ table : main table ] . since it is the parity of @xmath149 in the number @xmath205 of channels per wire that matters for the stability of the kramers degenerate helical edge states , we use the group of two integers @xmath0 under addition modulo 2 in the third column on line 3 of table [ table : main table ] . if we were to impose conservation of the projection of the spin-@xmath19 quantum number on the quantization axis , we must then preclude from all scattering vectors processes by which a spin is flipped . in particular , the scattering vectors ( [ eq : def mathcal teff aii ] ) and ( [ eq : def mathcal teff aii ] ) are not admissible anymore . by imposing the @xmath106 residual symmetry of the full @xmath212 symmetry group for a spin-@xmath19 degree of freedom , we recover the group of integers @xmath1 under the addition that encodes the topological stability in the quantum spin hall effect ( qshe ) . we close the discussion of the symmetry class aii by justifying the interpretation of the index so as an abbreviation for the intrinsic spin - orbit coupling . to this end , we introduce a set of @xmath129 pairs of scattering vectors [ eq : def mathcal t r aii ] @xmath213 and @xmath214 for @xmath215 . the scattering vector ( [ eq : def mathcal t r aii a ] ) labels a one - body interaction in the fermion representation that fulfills eq . ( [ eq : def mathcal t b ] ) . the index r is an acronym for rashba as it describes a backward scattering process by which a left mover with spin down from wire @xmath136 is scattered into a right mover with spin up on wire @xmath186 and conversely . for any @xmath130 , we also introduce the pair of amplitudes @xmath216 and the pair of phases @xmath217 according to eqs . ( [ eq : trs h d ] ) and ( [ eq : trs h e ] ) , respectively . in contrast to the intrinsic spin - orbit scattering vectors , the rashba scattering vectors ( [ eq : def mathcal t r aii a ] ) fail to meet the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) as @xmath218 hence , the rashba scattering processes fail to open a gap in the bulk , as is expected of a rashba coupling in a two - dimensional electron gas . on the other hand , the intrinsic spin - orbit coupling can lead to a phase with a gap in the bulk that supports the spin quantum hall effect in a two - dimensional electron gas . the simplest example among the topological superconductors can be found in the symmetry class d that is defined by the presence of a phs with @xmath219 and the absence of trs . with the understanding of phs as discussed in sec . [ sec : phs in superconductors ] , we construct a representative phase in class d from identical wires supporting right- and left - moving spinless fermions each of which carry a particle or a hole label , i.e. , @xmath177 . the @xmath124-matrix reads [ eq : def h of v for class d ] @xmath220 the entries in the @xmath124-matrix represent , from left to right , a right - moving particle , a left - moving particle , a left - moving hole , and a right - moving hole . the operation for the exchange of particles and holes in any one of the @xmath15 wires is represented by [ one verifies that eq . ( [ eq : phs on p and i ] ) holds ] @xmath221 we define @xmath64 by choosing any symmetric @xmath222 matrix @xmath181 that obeys @xmath223 we define @xmath54 by choosing @xmath224 scattering vectors as follows . for any wire @xmath225 , we introduce the scattering vector [ eq : def h of t for class d ] @xmath226 between any pair of neighboring wires we introduce the scattering vector @xmath227 for @xmath130 . we observe that both @xmath228 and @xmath229 are eigenvectors of the particle - hole transformation in that @xmath230 thus , to comply with phs , we have to demand that the phases @xmath231 while @xmath232 are unrestricted . similarly , the amplitudes @xmath233 and @xmath234 can take arbitrary real values . one verifies that the set of scattering vectors defined by eqs . ( [ eq : def h of t for class d d ] ) and ( [ eq : def h of t for class d e ] ) satisfies the haldane criterion . correspondingly , the term @xmath54 gaps out @xmath235 of the @xmath192 gapless modes of @xmath64 . furthermore , one identifies with @xmath236 a unique ( up to an integer multiplicative factor ) scattering vector that satisfies the haldane criterion with all existing scattering vectors eqs . ( [ eq : def h of t for class d d ] ) and ( [ eq : def h of t for class d e ] ) and could thus potentially gap out the remaining pair of modes . however , the tunneling @xmath237 is non - local for it connects the two edges of the system when open boundary conditions are chosen . we thus conclude that the two remaining modes are exponentially localized near wire @xmath144 and wire @xmath145 , respectively , and propagate with opposite chirality . to give a physical interpretation of the resulting topological ( edge ) theory in this wire construction , one has to keep in mind that the degrees of freedom were artificially doubled . we found , in this doubled theory , a single chiral boson ( with chiral central charge @xmath238 ) . to interpret it as the edge of a chiral @xmath239 superconductor , we impose the reality condition to obtain a single chiral majorana mode with chiral central charge @xmath240 . the pictorial representation of the topological phase in the symmetry class d through the wire construction is shown on the fifth row of table [ table : main table ] . the generalization to an arbitrary number @xmath149 of gapless chiral edge modes is analogous to the case discussed in symmetry class a. the number of robust gapless chiral edge states of a given chirality is thus integer . this is the reason why the group of integers @xmath1 is found in the third column on the fifth line of table [ table : main table ] . the remaining two topological nontrivial superconducting classes diii ( trs with @xmath176 and phs with @xmath219 ) and c ( phs with @xmath241 ) involve spin-@xmath19 fermions . each wire thus features no less than @xmath242 internal degrees of freedom corresponding to the spin-@xmath19 , chirality , and particle / hole indices . the construction is very similar to the cases we already presented . we relegate details to the appendices [ appendixsec : symmetry class c ] and [ appendixsec : symmetry class diii ] . the scattering vectors that are needed to gap out the bulk for each class of class diii and c are represented pictorially in the fourth column on lines 4 and 9 of table [ table : main table ] . we have provided an explicit construction by way of an array of wires supporting fermions that realizes all five insulating and superconducting topological phases of matter with a nondegenerate ground state in two - dimensional space according to the tenfold classification of band insulators and superconductors . the topological protection of edge modes in the bosonic formulation follows from imposing the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) along with the appropriate symmetry constraints . in the next section we shall extend the wire construction to allow many - body tunneling processes that delivers fractionalized phases with degenerate ground states . the power of the wire construction goes much beyond what we have used in sec . [ sec : reproducing the tenfold way ] to reproduce the classification of the sre phases . in this section we describe how to construct models for interacting phases of matter with intrinsic topological order and fractionalized excitations by relaxing the condition on the tunnelings between wires that they be of the one - body type . while these phases are more complex , the principles for constructing the models and proving the stability of edge modes remain the same : all allowed tunneling vectors have to obey the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) and the respective symmetries . first , we review the models of quantum wires that are topologically equivalent to the laughlin state in the fqhe , @xcite following the construction in ref . for abelian fractional quantum hall states . here , we want to emphasize that the choice of scattering vectors is determined by the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) and at the same time prepare the grounds for the construction of fractional topological insulators with trs in sec . [ subsec : symmetry class aii : fractional topological insulators ] . we want to construct the fermionic laughlin series of states indexed by the positive odd integer @xmath243 . @xcite ( by the same method , other fractional quantum hall phases from the abelian hierarchy could be constructed.@xcite ) the elementary degrees of freedom in each wire are spinless right- and left - moving fermions with the @xmath124-matrix [ eq : def array quantum wires tse a ] @xmath244 as is done in eq . ( [ eq : def h for class a a ] ) . reversal of time is defined through @xmath72 and @xmath84 given in eq ( [ eq : def h for class a b ] ) . instead of eq ( [ eq : def h of t for class a ] ) , the scattering vectors that describe the interactions between the wires are now defined by @xmath245 for any @xmath215 , where @xmath246 [ see table [ table : main table ] for an illustration of the scattering process ] . for any @xmath215 , the scattering ( tunneling ) vectors ( [ eq : def array quantum wires tse a b ] ) preserve the conservation of the total fermion number in that they obey eq . , and they encode a tunneling interaction of order @xmath247 , with @xmath62 defined in eq . . as a set , all tunneling interactions satisfy the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) , for @xmath248 we note that the choice of tunneling vector in eq . is unique ( up to an integer multiplicative factor ) if one insists on charge conservation , compliance with the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) , and only includes scattering between neighboring wires . the bare counting of tunneling vectors shows that the wire model gaps out all but two modes . however , we still have to convince ourself that the remaining two modes ( i ) live on the edge , ( ii ) can not be gapped out by other ( local ) scattering vectors and ( iii ) are made out of fractionalized quasiparticles . to address ( i ) and ( ii ) , we note that the remaining two modes can be gapped out by a unique ( up to an integer multiplicative factor ) charge - conserving scattering vector that satisfies the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) with all existing scatterings , namely @xmath249 connecting the opposite ends of the array of wires through the tunneling @xmath6 is not an admissible perturbation , for it violates locality in the two - dimensional thermodynamic limit @xmath5 . had we chosen periodic boundary conditions corresponding to a cylinder geometry ( i.e. , a tube as in fig . [ fig : boundaryconditions ] ) by which the first and last wire are nearest neighbors , @xmath6 would be admissible . hence , the gapless nature of the remaining modes when open boundary conditions are chosen depends on the boundary conditions . these gapless modes have support near the boundary only and are topologically protected . applying the transformation with @xmath250 where @xmath251 transforms the @xmath124-matrix into @xmath252 as its determinant is not unity , the linear transformation ( [ eq : trasf for fields phi a b r ] ) changes the compactification radius of the new field @xmath253 relative to the compactification radius of the old field @xmath254 accordingly . finally , the transformed tunneling vectors are given by @xmath255 where @xmath256 and @xmath215 . in view of eqs . and , the remaining effective edge theory is described by @xmath257 this is a chiral theory at each edge that can not be gapped by local perturbations . equation is precisely the edge theory for anyons with statistical angle @xmath258 and charge @xmath259 , @xcite where @xmath153 is the charge of the original fermions . having understood how fractionalized quasiparticles emerge out of a wire construction , it is imperative to ask what other phases can be obtained when symmetries are imposed on the topologically ordered phase . such symmetry enriched topological phases have been classified by methods of group cohomology . @xcite here , we shall exemplify for the case of trs with @xmath176 how the wire construction can be used to build up an intuition for these phases and to study the stability of their edge theory . the elementary degrees of freedom in each wire are spin-@xmath19 right- and left - moving fermions with the @xmath124-matrix [ eq : def array quantum wires tse aii ] @xmath260 as is done in eq . ( [ eq : def h of v for class aii a ] ) . reversal of time is defined through @xmath72 and @xmath84 given in eq ( [ eq : def h of v for class aii b ] ) . instead of eq ( [ eq : def h of t for class aii d ] ) , the scattering vectors that describe the interactions between the wires are now defined by @xmath261 and @xmath262 for any @xmath215 , @xmath243 a positive odd integer , and @xmath263 . for any @xmath215 , the scattering ( tunneling ) vectors ( [ eq : def array quantum wires tse aii b ] ) preserve conservation of the total fermion number in that they obey eq . , and they encode a tunneling interaction of order @xmath247 with @xmath62 defined in eq . . they also satisfy the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) as a set [ see table [ table : main table ] for an illustration of the scattering process ] . applying the transformation with @xmath264 to the bosonic fields , leaves the representation of time - reversal invariant @xmath265 while casting the theory in a new form with the transformed @xmath266-matrix given by @xmath267 and , for any @xmath215 , with the transformed pair of scattering vectors @xmath268 given by @xmath269 and @xmath270 when these scattering vectors have gapped out all modes in the bulk , the effective edge theory is described by @xmath271 this effective @xmath124-matrix describes a single kramers degenerate pair of @xmath258 anyons propagating along the first wire and another single kramers degenerate pair of @xmath258 anyons propagating along the last wire . their robustness to local perturbations is guaranteed by trs . unlike in the tenfold way , the correspondence between the bulk topological phase and the edge theories of lre phases is not one - to - one . for example , while a bulk topological lre phase supports fractionalized topological excitations in the bulk , its edge modes may be gapped out by symmetry - allowed perturbations . for the phases discussed in this section , namely the abelian and trs fractional topological insulators , it was shown in refs . and that the edge , consisting of kramers degenerate pairs of edge modes , supports at most one stable kramers degenerate pair of delocalized quasiparticles that are stable against disorder . ( note that this does not preclude the richer edge physics of non - abelian trs fractional topological insulators . @xcite ) we will now argue that the wire constructions with edge modes given by eq . exhaust all stable edge theories of abelian topological phases which are protected by trs with @xmath176 alone . let the single protected kramers degenerate pair be characterized by the linear combination of bosonic fields @xmath272 and its time - reversed partner @xmath273 where the tunneling vector @xmath58 was constructed from the microscopic information from the theory in ref . and @xmath274 is the @xmath124-matrix of a trs bulk chern - simons theory from the theory in ref . . [ in other words , the theory encoded by @xmath274 has nothing to do a priori with the array of quantum wires defined by eq . ( [ eq : def array quantum wires tse aii ] ) . ] the kramers degenerate pair of modes @xmath275 is stable against trs perturbations supported on a single edge if and only if @xmath276 is an odd number . here , @xmath277 is the charge vector with integer entries that determines the coupling of the different modes to the electromagnetic field . provided @xmath275 is stable , its equal - time commutation relations follow from eq . ( [ eq : def hat phi s b ] ) as @xmath278 = & \ , -\mathrm{i}\pi\ , \left ( \mathcal{t}^{\mathsf{t}}\ , \mathcal{k}'\ , \mathcal{t}\ , \mathrm{sgn}(x - x ' ) + \mathcal{t}^{\mathsf{t}}\ , \mathcal{l}\ , \mathcal{t } \right ) , \\ \left[\hat{\bar{\varphi}}(x),\hat{\bar{\varphi}}(x')\right ] = & \ , -\mathrm{i}\pi\ , \left ( -\mathcal{t}^{\mathsf{t}}\ , \mathcal{k}'\ , \mathcal{t}\ , \mathrm{sgn}(x - x ' ) + \overline{\mathcal{t}}^{\mathsf{t}}\ , \mathcal{l}\ , \overline{\mathcal{t } } \right),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we used that @xmath274 anticommutes with @xmath279 according to eq . ( [ eq : trs h c ] ) . by the same token , we can show that the fields @xmath280 and @xmath281 commute , for @xmath282 we conclude that the effective edge theory for _ any _ abelian trs fractional topological insulator build from fermions has the effective form of one kramers degenerate pairs @xmath283 and is thus entirely defined by the single integer @xmath284 with the scattering vectors ( [ eq : def array quantum wires tse aii c ] ) we have given an explicit wire construction for each of these cases , thus exhausting all possible stable edge theories for abelian fractional topological insulators . for each positive odd integer @xmath243 , we can thus say that the fractionalized mode has a @xmath0 character : it can have either one or none stable kramers degenerate pair of @xmath243 quasiparticles . in sec . [ subsec : symmetry class aii : fractional topological insulators ] we have imposed trs on the wire construction of fractional quantum hall states and obtained the fractional topological insulator in symmetry class aii . in complete analogy , we can impose phs with @xmath219 on the wire construction of a fractional quantum hall state , thereby promoting it to symmetry class d. physically , there follows a model for a superconductor with fractionalized " majorana fermions or bogoliubov quasiparticles . lately , interest in this direction has been revived by the investigation of exotic quantum dimensions of twist defects embedded in an abelian fractional quantum hall liquid , @xcite along with heterostructures of superconductors combined with fractional quantum hall effect , @xcite or fractional topological insulators . @xcite furthermore , the kitaev quantum wire has been generalized to @xmath285 clock models hosting parafermionic edge modes , @xcite along with efforts to transcend the read - rezayi quantum hall state @xcite to spin liquids @xcite and superconductors , @xcite all of which exhibit parafermionic quasiparticles . as in the classification of non - interacting insulators , we treat the bogoliubov quasiparticles under bosonization as if they were dirac fermions . the fractional phase is driven by interactions among the bogoliubov quasiparticles . the elementary degrees of freedom in each wire are spinless right- and left - moving fermions and holes as was defined for symmetry class d in eqs . - . we construct the fractional topological insulator using the set of phs scattering vectors @xmath228 , for @xmath225 with @xmath228 as defined in eq . in each wire and the phs as defined in eq . . we complement them with the set of phs scattering vectors @xmath229 , for @xmath215 defined by @xmath286 with @xmath243 an odd positive integer . notice that @xmath287 so that we have to demand that @xmath288 has to comply with phs . thus , together the @xmath228 and @xmath229 gap out @xmath235 of the @xmath192 chiral modes in the wire . we can identify a unique ( up to an integer multiplicative factor ) scattering vector @xmath289 with @xmath243 the ame odd positive integer as in eq . ( [ eq : def overline t for class d j=1 ... n-1 ] ) that satisfies the haldane criterion with all @xmath228 and @xmath229 and thus can potentially gap out the 2 remaining modes . however , it is physically forbidden for it represents a non - local scattering from one edge to the other . we conclude that each boundary supports a single remaining chiral mode that is an eigenstate of phs . to understand the nature of the single remaining chiral mode on each boundary , we use the local linear transformation @xmath160 of the bosonic fields @xmath290 with determinant @xmath291 . when applied to the non - local scattering vector @xmath292 that connects the two remaining chiral edge modes , @xmath293 while the @xmath124 matrix changes under this transformation to @xmath294 noting that the representation of phs is unchanged @xmath295 we can interpret the remaining chiral edge mode as a phs superposition of a laughlin quasiparticle and a laughlin quasihole . it thus describes a fractional chiral edge mode on either side of the two - dimensional array of quantum wires . the definite chirality is an important difference to the case of the fractional @xmath0 topological insulator discussed in sec . [ subsec : symmetry class aii : fractional topological insulators ] . it guarantees that any integer number @xmath296 layers of this theory is stable , for no tunneling vector that acts locally on one edge can satisfy the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) . for each @xmath243 , we can thus say that the parafermion mode has a @xmath1 character , as does the sre phase in symmetry class d. needed are the many - body tunneling matrices for class diii and c. we refer the reader to the appendices [ appendixsec : symmetry class c ] and [ appendixsec : symmetry class diii ] for their definitions . for class diii , the edge excitations ( and bulk quasiparticles ) of the phase are trs fractionalized bogoliubov quasiparticles that have also been discussed in one - dimensional realizations . ( in the latter context , these trs fractionalized bogoliubov quasiparticles are rather susceptible to perturbations . in this work , we have developed a wire construction to build models of short - range entangled and long - range entangled topological phases in two spatial dimensions , so as to yield immediate information about the topological stability of their edge modes . as such , we have promoted the periodic table of integer topological phases to its fractional counterpart . the following paradigms were applied . + ( 1 ) each luttinger liquid wire describes ( spinfull or spinless ) electrons . we rely on a bosonized description . + ( 2 ) back - scattering and short - range interactions within and between wires are added . modes are gapped out if these terms acquire a finite expectation value . + ( 3 ) a mutual compatibility condition , the haldane criterion , is imposed among the terms that acquire an expectation value . it is an incarnation of the statement that the operators have to commute if they are to be replaced simultaneously by their expectation values . + ( 4 ) a set of discrete and local symmetries are imposed on all terms in the hamiltonian . when modes become massive , they may not break these symmetries . + ( 5 ) we do not study the renormalization group flow of the interaction and back - scattering terms , but analyze the model in a strong - coupling limit . using this strategy , the following directions present themselves for future work . first , for symmetry class a , we have shown that sufficiently strong interactions among identical electrons can turn any topological phase with the same topological number controlling both the hall and thermal conductivities into a sre topological phase with independent quantized values of the hall and thermal conductivities . [ we only need to make the interaction encoded by eq . ( [ eq : definition of interactions that produce bosons out of fermions ] ) dominant . ] hence , it is natural to seek a putative breakdown of the topological counterpart to the wiedemann - franz law for metals in the symmetry class aii and for the lre phases in the symmetry classes a and aii . second , we can impose on our wire construction additional , albeit less generic , symmetries such as a non - local inversion symmetry or such as a residual @xmath106 spin symmetry . third , our construction can be extended to topological phases of systems that have bosons as their elementary degrees of freedom . for bosons , no analogue of the tenfold way exists to provide guidance . however , several works are dedicated to the classification of sre and lre phases of bosons , which might provide a helpful starting point . @xcite fourth , extensions to higher dimensions could be considered . @xcite this would , however , entail leaving the comfort zone of one - dimensional bosonization , with a necessary generalization of the haldane criterion in a layer construction . this work was supported by the european research council through the grant topolectrics , erc - stg - thomale-336012 , by darpa spawarsyscen pacific n66001 - 11 - 1 - 4110 ( t.n . ) , and by doe grant def-06er46316 ( c.c . ) . the conditions ( [ eq : trs h ] ) and ( [ eq : phs h ] ) for trs and phs can be derived by adapting the derivations @xmath297 and @xmath298 of eqs . ( [ eq : trs h d ] ) and ( [ eq : trs h e ] ) , respectively . class c is defined on line 9 of table [ table : main table ] by the operator @xmath66 for the phs obeying @xmath241 with neither trs nor chiral symmetry present ( as is implied by the entries 0 for @xmath7 and @xmath9 in table [ table : main table ] ) . in physical terms , class c describes a generic superconductor for which full spin @xmath212 symmetry is retained but trs is broken . the only difference to the case of class d considered in the main text is that the number of degrees of freedom is doubled . we postulate that under phs the following transformation rules hold @xmath299 for the creation operators of bogoliubov - degennes quasiparticles that are right ( r ) movers at the fermi energy and carry the spin quantum numbers @xmath300 . we apply the same transformation law to the creation operators of bogoliubov - degennes quasiparticles that are left ( l ) movers at the fermi energy and carry the spin quantum numbers @xmath300 . we consider identical wires with quasiparticles of type 1 and 2 , `` particles '' and `` holes '' , as well as left- and right - moving degrees of freedom . for any given wire with the basis ( @xmath301 , @xmath302 , @xmath303 , @xmath304 , @xmath305 , @xmath306 , @xmath307 , @xmath308 ) , the @xmath124-matrix reads @xmath309 where phs has the representation @xmath310 to complete the definition of an array of quantum wires realizing a sre phase in the symmetry class c , we specify the @xmath235 scattering vectors @xmath311 [ eq : tunneling vectors for c sre ] for @xmath225 , and @xmath312 . these scattering vectors gap out all modes in the bulk and comply both with phs and with the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) . of the remaining four modes , two are localized at either edge of the system . the remaining two modes on either edge share the same chirality , for they could be gapped out by the non - local scattering vectors @xmath313 which act on modes with @xmath14 chirality on the left and and of @xmath13 chirality on the right edge only . we conclude that the pair of chiral modes on either edge is protected from backscattering . extending this construction to any integer number of layers yields the @xmath1 classification of class c. to complete the definition of an array of quantum wires realizing a lre phase in the symmetry class c , we use the @xmath143 scattering vectors @xmath314 and @xmath315 , @xmath316 defined in eq . and supplement them with the @xmath142 scattering vectors latexmath:[\[\begin{aligned } \mathcal{t}^{(j)}_{3,\mathrm{lre}}:=&\ , ( 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0|\cdots| 0,-m^{\,}_{-},m^{\,}_{+},0,-m^{\,}_{+},0,0,m^{\,}_{-}|0,-m^{\,}_{+},m^{\,}_{-},0,-m^{\,}_{-},0,0,m^{\,}_{+ } \\ \mathcal{t}^{(j)}_{4,\mathrm{lre}}:=&\ , ( 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0|\cdots| m^{\,}_{-},0,0,-m^{\,}_{+},0,m^{\,}_{+},-m^{\,}_{-},0|m^{\,}_{+},0,0,-m^{\,}_{-},0,m^{\,}_{-},-m^{\,}_{+},0 for @xmath134 , and @xmath263 as well as @xmath243 an odd positive integer . these tunneling vectors gap out all modes in the bulk and comply both with phs and with the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) . one verifies that there exists a linear transformation with integer entires @xmath160 and @xmath318 such that @xmath319 the @xmath124-matrix transforms according to eq . , leaving the effective effective edge theory with two chiral modes of phs symmetric superpositions of laughlin quasiparticles with laughlin quasiholes on either edge of the system . as with the sre phase of symmetry class c , this is a completely chiral theory and no back - scattering mechanism can gap out modes by the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) . extending this construction to any integer number of layers yields a @xmath1 classification of the lre phase in symmetry class c for every positive odd integer @xmath243 . class diii is defined on line 4 of table [ table : main table ] by the operator @xmath66 for the phs obeying @xmath219 and with the trs @xmath176 . in physical terms , class diii describes a generic superconductor for which full spin @xmath212 symmetry is broken but trs is retained . we use the same basis and @xmath124-matrix as specified for class c in eq . , namely for @xmath225 , and @xmath312 . these tunnelings gap out all the bulk modes . here , @xmath314 and @xmath315 as well as @xmath324 and @xmath325 are pairwise related by trs , while each of the tunneling vectors is in itself phs . the phases of the corresponding cosine terms in hamiltonian comply with both trs and phs as if @xmath326 on both wire @xmath327 and wire @xmath4 , there remains a single kramers degenerate pair of propagating modes . now , the tunneling vector @xmath328 acts locally on the left edge , satisfies the haldane criterion with all existing scattering vectors , and is unique up to an integer multiplicative factor . it might thus be concluded that the left pair of kramers degenerate edge states can be gapped by the tunneling @xmath329 . this is not so however . indeed , while @xmath329 itself is both compliant with phs and trs , its contribution to @xmath54 induces another expectation value that breaks trs spontaneously . to see this , we note that , by the particle - hole redundancy , the bosonic fields @xmath330 and @xmath331 as well as @xmath332 and @xmath333 have to be identified . thus , it is @xmath334 that acquires an expectation value . now , the term @xmath335 is more relevant from the point of view of the renormalization group than @xmath336 . if @xmath336 acquires an expectation value , so does @xmath335 . however , @xmath335 corresponds to @xmath337 ( and scattering vectors related by phs ) must then break trs spontaneously , for the resulting condition @xmath338 on the phase of its cosine term can not be met . if we rule out the spontaneous breaking of trs on the left edge , we must rule out the tunnelings @xmath339 for any integer @xmath149 . under this assumption , there remains a single gapless left pair of kramers degenerate edge states . we conclude that there is no possibility to localize the remaining edge modes with perturbations that comply with both trs and phs . had we considered two layers of this wire model , edge modes in both layers can be gapped out pairwise , similar to the case of class aii that we discussed in the main text . we conclude that the sre phase of symmetry class diii features a @xmath0 topological classification . to complete the definition of an array of quantum wires realizing a lre phase in the symmetry class d iii , we use the @xmath143 scattering vectors @xmath314 and @xmath315 , @xmath316 defined in eq . and supplement them with the @xmath142 scattering vectors latexmath:[\[\begin{aligned } \mathcal{t}^{(j)}_{3,\mathrm{lre}}:=&\ , ( 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0|\cdots| -m^{\,}_{-},0,m^{\,}_{+},0,-m^{\,}_{+},0,m^{\,}_{-},0|-m^{\,}_{+},0,m^{\,}_{-},0,-m^{\,}_{-},0,m^{\,}_{+},0 for @xmath134 , and @xmath263 as well as @xmath243 an odd positive integer . these tunneling vectors gap out all modes in the bulk and comply both with phs and with the haldane criterion ( [ eq : haldane conditions ] ) . one verifies that there exists a linear transformation with integer entires @xmath160 and @xmath318 such that @xmath341 the @xmath124-matrix transforms according to eq . , leaving the effective effective edge theory with one kramers degenerate pair of phs symmetric superpositions of laughlin quasiparticles with laughlin quasi - holes on either edge of the system . as with the sre phase of symmetry class diii , this edge theory is protected by phs and trs . two copies of it , however , can be fully gapped out while preserving phs and trs . this yields a @xmath0 classification of the lre phase in symmetry class diii for every positive odd integer @xmath243 . a chiral symmetry is preseent if there exists a chiral operator @xmath342 that is antiunitary and commutes with the hamiltonian . the single - particle representation @xmath343 of @xmath342 is a unitary operator that anticommutes with the single - particle hamiltonian . in a basis in which @xmath343 is strictly block off diagonal , @xmath343 reverses the chirality . this chirality is unrelated to the direction of propagation of left and right movers which is also called chirality in this paper . Abstract:
[ "a scheme is proposed to construct integer and fractional topological quantum states of fermions in two spatial dimensions . we devise models for such states by coupling wires of non - chiral luttinger liquids of electrons , that are arranged in a periodic array . which inter - wire couplings are allowed is dictated by symmetry and the compatibility criterion that they can simultaneously acquire a finite expectation value , opening a spectral gap between the ground state(s ) and all excited states in the bulk . first , with these criteria at hand , we reproduce the tenfold classification table of integer topological insulators , where their stability against interactions becomes immediately transparent in the luttinger liquid description . second , we construct an example of a strongly interacting fermionic topological phase of matter with short - range entanglement that lies outside of the tenfold classification . third , we expand the table to long - range entangled topological phases with intrinsic topological order and fractional excitations ." ]
13,025
13,025
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the formation of a quark - gluon plasma ( qgp ) is achieved in ultra - relativistic heavy - ion collision experiments at relativistic heavy - ion collider ( rhic ) in bnl and at the large hadron collider ( lhc ) in cern . more and more information on properties of strongly interacting quark - gluon matter in quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) is being accumulated . however , despite a number of interesting discoveries and new notions established in experiments , the thermalization mechanism that leads to the qgp still lacks a deep understanding based on qcd first principles . there have been many attempts to estimate the thermalization time scale , that is phenomenologically known to be @xmath0 from analysis in hydrodynamic models @xcite . it was argued @xcite that perturbative qcd processes lead to a thermalization time of order @xmath1 where the saturation momentum @xmath2 is a characteristic hard scale in the high - energy reactions ; @xmath3-@xmath4 in the typical rhic kinematics . if the prefactor is of order unity , this estimate would yield a thermalization time around several @xmath5 , which is too slow to account for the rhic observations . it has also been suggested that qcd perturbation theory , no matter at which order one truncates it , may be unable to describe thermalization at all @xcite . plasma instabilities , particularly the weibel instability @xcite , could be promising candidates for the early thermalization mechanism @xcite and have been well investigated in the hard - loop formalism @xcite . there are also various other approaches @xcite including a framework based on the ads / cft correspondence @xcite , in which thermalization appears as the formation of a black hole horizon in the dual theory . parallel to the analysis on plasma instabilities , an important observation was made in a related theoretical framework . the occupation number of gluons at high energy is so huge that color field amplitudes @xmath6 can be realized , and then non - linearities must be taken into account to all orders . instead of a plain perturbative expansion , then , an approximation in terms of classical field equations becomes more suitable because it effectively makes a resummation of large - amplitude fields @xmath7 . this non - linear regime , whose natural time scale is of order @xmath8 at rhic , is expected to be prevalent during the early stages in heavy - ion collisions . the qcd framework known as the color glass condensate ( cgc ) @xcite rearranges the perturbative expansion in terms of classical fields ( that correspond to the resummation of infinite sets of graphs ) , and perturbations on top of these classical fields are of higher order in @xmath9 . the cgc was first developed in order to deal with the saturation effect in the gluon distribution function @xcite . because we are interested in the early time ( @xmath10 ) dynamics before thermalization , the cgc description seems to be the most suited for our purpose . the initial condition just above the forward light - cone ( i.e. at @xmath11 ) for the classical field that appears at lowest order in the cgc description can be nicely formulated in the bjorken ( expanding ) coordinates @xcite . because in the regime of large occupation numbers , classical field theory and kinetic theory essentially describe the same dynamics @xcite , it is conceivable that the cgc can describe the isotropization and thermalization processes qualitatively . however , for this program to have a chance to work , it is necessary to go beyond the lowest order description , since at zeroth order it is well known that the pressure tensor never isotropizes . it is unfortunately impossible to obtain an analytical solution of the classical yang - mills equations of motion for the heavy - ion collision ( two - source ) problem , and therefore one has to resort to numerical simulations . in refs . @xcite , heavy - ion collisions were simulated in the mclerran - venugopalan ( mv ) model ( i.e. the cgc at lowest order , with a local gaussian distribution of color sources ) , formulated gauge - invariantly in terms of link variables . these numerical calculations were later confirmed by an independent simulation in ref . the peculiar feature in the cgc description at leading order is that the initial condition for the classical fields is independent of the space - time rapidity variable @xmath12 , and the equations of motion maintain @xmath12-independence during the time evolution . therefore , the space - time evolution is entirely independent of @xmath12 , that is , invariant under boosts in the direction of the collision axis . intuitively , one can expect a longitudinally extended structure of the initial fields , which is indeed a characteristic property of the so - called `` glasma '' state @xcite , which could be a source for the so - called ridge structure seen in the two - particle correlations at rhic and lhc @xcite . within the cgc framework , an instability has been found when the boost invariant glasma fields are disturbed @xcite . this instability has some similarities to the weibel instability in anisotropic plasmas , but the origin of the instability is not yet fully clarified , though several interpretations have been proposed @xcite . also , it is still an issue how to properly formulate disturbances to the boost invariant cgc background . however , it is clear that such perturbations arise when one considers higher order corrections to the leading cgc picture @xcite , and therefore they should not be ignored since they can alter phenomena such as particle production @xcite , etc . moreover , without including these perturbations , one can not quantify the thermalization processes . one of the reasons why the origin of the glasma instability lacks a clear understanding is that the available numerical data from earlier works @xcite is rather limited . this motivates us to carry out a more systematic survey of the glasma instability , exploiting a wider range of simulation parameters . in this work we will specifically investigate the dependence of the glasma instability on the following parameters : * [ i ] * _ transverse grid size @xmath13 : _ it is known that the initial energy density at @xmath11 is sensitive to the ultraviolet and infrared regulators in the transverse direction , and this sensitivity becomes milder at finite @xmath14 @xcite . it is therefore important to check whether continuum - limit results can be obtained reliably by looking systematically at the dependence on the transverse lattice spacing @xmath15 , where @xmath16 is the length of the box and @xmath13 the number of lattice points in the transverse direction . * [ ii ] * _ longitudinal grid size @xmath17 : _ physical results should also not be contaminated by ultraviolet singularities in the longitudinal direction . to avoid this , we will use initial fluctuations with sufficiently small longitudinal wave - number @xmath18 ( @xmath18 is the fourier conjugate to the rapidity @xmath12 ) . we will confirm that there is no dependence on the longitudinal grid size @xmath17 or the longitudinal lattice spacing @xmath19 , at least until the longitudinal spectrum extends into the ultraviolet regions at very late time . * [ iii ] * _ magnitude @xmath20 of the seeds : _ in general the strength of the instability increases with the magnitude @xmath20 of the initial @xmath12-dependent perturbations . this dependence is found to be very simple until the unstable modes become large enough to be self - interacting : at moderate times , the finite-@xmath18 modes obey the linearized dynamics and their amplitudes grow linearly as @xmath20 increases . * [ iv ] * _ initial wave - number @xmath21 : _ the time evolution depends on the initial condition in the longitudinal direction , and in particular on the wave - number @xmath21 of the seeds . we will show that the instability produced by the smallest wave - number is defined to be an integer between @xmath22 and @xmath23 . the lowest non - zero wave - number is thus @xmath24 . ] ( @xmath25 ) is the fastest and strongest in a wide range of times . we will also confirm the dominance of linearity and the appreciable presence of residual non - linear effects by verifying that the result from an initial condition with multiple @xmath21 s can be approximated as the superposition of the results from initial conditions with single wave - numbers @xmath21 s . in this paper , we report on numerical results about these dependences for the growing behavior at the late stage of the glasma evolution . these numerical results provide a pool of observations that we hope will help to understand the microscopic mechanisms that drive the glasma instabilities . in the section [ sec : formulas ] , we recall the most important formulas for a lattice study of this problem . in the section [ sec : bi ] , we briefly expose some results in the purely boost - invariant case . these are well - known results already , and merely serve as a check of our implementation . in the section [ sec : notbi ] , we describe what happens when the glasma fields are perturbed by a rapidity - dependent seed , and we investigate thoroughly how the result depends on the parameters listed above . we explore the time evolution of the @xmath18-spectrum in the section [ sec : lspectrum ] . finally , the section [ sec : summary ] is devoted to a summary and outlook . in this section , we summarize our equations , with emphasis on the lattice specificities . the main goal of this section is to avoid confusions due to the existence of different conventions in the literature for some quantities . the link variables are defined as @xmath26 with the gauge potential @xmath27 that connects the neighboring sites from @xmath28 and @xmath29 . this expression for the link variable is the most important one in order to establish the correspondence between the continuum and the lattice ( link - variable ) formulations . under a gauge transformation by @xmath30 the link variables transform as @xmath31 and the chromo - electric fields as @xmath32 the plaquette variable is then defined as @xmath33 \ ; , \label{eq : approxf}\ ] ] where the last form is an approximation which gives rise to the field strength @xmath34 $ ] of the continuum formulation . this is a very useful expression to study the continuum limit . the lattice spacing should be the longitudinal one , i.e. @xmath35 , which is distinct from the transverse one @xmath36 , if the longitudinal direction is involved in the displacements @xmath37 or @xmath38 in the above formula . the canonical momenta in terms of link variables are expressed as @xmath39 here we note that in the above we already use variables made dimensionless by the transverse lattice spacing @xmath36 , and thus @xmath36 will never appear explicitly in our formula . because @xmath12 is a dimensionless number , @xmath35 does not bring any mass dimension unlike @xmath36 . we can also discretize the time in the above equations in order to solve the time evolution numerically for @xmath40 and @xmath41 ; @xmath42 u_i(\tau ) \;,\\ u_\eta(\tau '' ) & = \exp\bigl [ -2{\delta\tau}\cdot { \mathrm{i}}g a_\eta \tau ' e^\eta(\tau ' ) \bigr ] u_\eta(\tau ) \;,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath43 and @xmath44 . note that we have not written explicitly the position arguments in the quantities that appear in these equations . here , the exponentiation of @xmath45 is important ; otherwise the updated @xmath46 would not be a unitary matrix . the equations of motion are discretized in the same manner as @xmath47_\tau \\ & \qquad + 2{\delta\tau}\frac{{\mathrm{i}}\tau}{2g}\ , \sum_{j\neq i } \bigl [ u_{ji}(x)+u_{-ji}(x ) - \text{(h.c . ) } \bigr]_\tau \ ; , \end{split}\ ] ] for the transverse components and @xmath48_\tau \;,\ ] ] for the longitudinal component . we recall again that all variables including @xmath14 and @xmath49 above are dimensionless , and expressed in unit of the transverse spacing @xmath36 . one can make sure that these equations are equivalent to the ordinary equations of motion in the continuum limit , by using the approximate form . the initial conditions are derived from the requirement of avoiding the singularity at the collision point . it is written in terms of @xmath50 , the classical solution of the mv model for a single color source ( the label @xmath51 indicates which of the two nuclei produces the corresponding field ) . this single - source classical solution is a transverse pure - gauge , @xmath52 where the gauge rotation matrix @xmath53 can be written as @xmath54 \;. \label{eq : wilson}\ ] ] here , @xmath55 is the solution of the poisson equation , @xmath56 . in the mv model , the random color source @xmath57 is gaussian distributed , with a two - point correlation @xmath58 higher - point correlation functions are obtained as products of two - point contractions , via wick s theorem . in the mv model , @xmath59 is the only dimensionful parameter and it is related to the saturation momentum @xmath2 . then , the initial conditions are @xcite ; @xmath60 \ ; , \label{eq : initial_e}\end{aligned}\ ] ] written here in the slightly simpler case of the su(2 ) color group . these discretized equations of motion and initial conditions completely define the numerical mv model . our conventions are mostly consistent with those of previous works , except for the fact that the field @xmath61 is not treated as an adjoint scalar - field variable but instead we also describe it in terms of a link variable @xmath62 . we note that our formulation is reduced to the conventional one with the adjoint scalar - field variable if we take @xmath35 to be sufficiently small . in addition , since our interest lies primarily in the qualitative behavior of the glasma instability , we disregard the color neutralization that has been imposed onto the mv model color sources in other works @xcite . it is now straightforward to implement the numerical calculation for gauge - invariant observables such as the components of the energy - momentum tensor . they are in the continuum convention written down as @xmath63\bigr\rangle \ ; , \label{eq : e } \\ & p_{_t } = \frac{1}{2}\bigl\langle t^{xx } + t^{yy } \bigr\rangle = \bigl\langle { \mathrm{tr}}\bigl [ e_{_l}^2 + b_{_l}^2 \bigr ] \bigr\rangle \ ; , \label{eq : p_{_t } } \\ & p_{_l } = \bigl\langle \tau^2 t^{\eta\eta } \bigr\rangle = \bigl\langle{\mathrm{tr}}\bigl [ e_{_t}^2 + b_{_t}^2 - e_{_l}^2 - b_{_l}^2 \bigr]\bigr\rangle \ ; , \label{eq : p_{_l}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we define @xmath64 these formulas are implicitly summed over the color index @xmath36 , for @xmath65 and @xmath66 to be gauge invariant . here , the chromo - magnetic field squared should be expressed in a way consistent with eq . , that is , @xmath67 these definitions are , however , not very convenient when we decompose the energy into its fourier components , as we will see later . we confirm that the energy - momentum tensor is traceless ; @xmath68 . it should also be mentioned that our definition of @xmath69 is different from that in refs . @xcite by a factor @xmath70 so that @xmath71 for an isotropic system . we first check the consistency with the known results in the boost - invariant case , i.e. in @xmath72 dimensions . this is useful also for later discussions on the spectral decomposition when we consider @xmath12-dependent fluctuations . in this section , we focus on @xmath12-independent classical solutions , with initial conditions specified in eqs . and that are themselves independent of @xmath12 . eventually , however , our goal is to superimpose @xmath12-dependent fluctuations to these boost invariant initial conditions in order to incorporate quantum effects @xcite . we note here that our numerical calculations are limited to the su(2 ) color group , so that we can get more samples and thus better statistics for the same computational cost . as discussed in ref . @xcite , the su(2 ) calculations capture the essential properties of the glasma instability , and we expect that the results we report here for the su(2 ) case would be qualitatively the same for su(3 ) . let us first take a look at a typical fixed initial configuration , without taking the ensemble average over the color sources , in order to develop an intuitive picture for the glasma state . in the mv model , the initial color distribution in the transverse plane is akin to white noise , having no correlation between different transverse sites . ] . since the solution of the poisson equation @xmath73 involves a convolution with a massless ( i.e. long ranged ) transverse propagator , @xmath74 has a smooth structure as shown in the left panel of fig . [ fig : lam ] . . the mv - model parameters are chosen as @xmath75 ( number of transverse sites ) and @xmath76 . left : the solution @xmath74 of the poisson equation . only the first color component @xmath77 is plotted . right : corresponding gauge field @xmath78 calculated from @xmath79 $ ] . only the first color component @xmath80 is plotted.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] . the mv - model parameters are chosen as @xmath75 ( number of transverse sites ) and @xmath76 . left : the solution @xmath74 of the poisson equation . only the first color component @xmath77 is plotted . right : corresponding gauge field @xmath78 calculated from @xmath79 $ ] . only the first color component @xmath80 is plotted.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] although @xmath74 is fairly smooth due to the regularizing effect of this convolution , the corresponding gauge field @xmath81 , which is a phase of @xmath82 defined in eq . , is far from smooth . this is actually a consequence of the pure - gauge form ; contributions from globally smooth parts in @xmath74 cancel each other and the resulting @xmath81 fluctuates strongly . in other words , @xmath81 has a rough structure because a derivative of @xmath74 undoes the regularization provided by the convolution . the @xmath81 shown in the figure [ fig : lam ] is the gauge field from a single source only . in a collision , the initial fields such as @xmath83 and @xmath84 involve a product of two @xmath81 s from two independent sources , and thus have an even rougher structure . it is worth mentioning that the `` color - flux tube '' structures , whose transverse size is expected to be of order @xmath85 , do not emerge manifestly from the mv model since the source distribution has no correlation length in the transverse direction . this means that the nielsen - olesen instability @xcite is unlikely to occur at least within the mv model . nevertheless , we expect that color - flux tube structures would appear after the jimwlk evolution from the mv - model distribution . in the mean - field approximation , in fact , the transverse correlation function of color source has been already studied in ref . @xcite , which should be taken into account in the future works . also , to make a clear comparison with the weibel instability and the hard - loop estimates ( especially early works @xcite ) , it would be useful to simplify the mv - model setup in ( 1 + 1 ) dimensions without transverse dependences in such a way not to lose the qualitative features of the glasma instability that we will see in the section [ sec : notbi ] . in this sense the results reported in the present paper should serve as a foundation for future investigations in these directions . . an ensemble average is taken over @xmath86 random configurations of @xmath87 for @xmath88 and @xmath89 , and over @xmath90 configurations for @xmath91 , @xmath92 , @xmath93 and @xmath94 . the mv model parameter is chosen as @xmath76 . right : chromo - electric and chromo - magnetic fields and for the same mv model parameters and @xmath88.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] . an ensemble average is taken over @xmath86 random configurations of @xmath87 for @xmath88 and @xmath89 , and over @xmath90 configurations for @xmath91 , @xmath92 , @xmath93 and @xmath94 . the mv model parameter is chosen as @xmath76 . right : chromo - electric and chromo - magnetic fields and for the same mv model parameters and @xmath88.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] defined in eq . and transverse pressure @xmath69 defined in eq . , multiplied by @xmath95.,scaledwidth=49.0% ] figure [ fig : energy ] shows the time evolution of the energy density and . we set @xmath76 which means that @xmath96 with @xmath97 according to the convention for the rhic physics in the literature @xcite . this choice corresponds to @xmath98 [ @xmath99 ( i.e. the radius of the au atom ) ] and @xmath100 ( where @xmath101 as usually chosen , meaning that @xmath102 ) . in most of the numerical results presented in this work , we keep using these parameters . we note that the strength of the glasma instability as seen in the next section is set by the instability seed @xmath20 relative to @xmath103 which characterizes the cgc background . in this sense , for our purpose in later discussions , the precise value of @xmath104 is of no qualitative importance . in fig . [ fig : energy ] , we investigate the dependence on the transverse grid size @xmath13 : the left plot shows how the energy density increases with increasing @xmath13 , varying from @xmath105 to @xmath88 from the bottom curve to the topmost one . it is already known in the literature @xcite that the @xmath13-dependence ( or the uv - cutoff dependence ) is significant at @xmath106 , but becomes almost irrelevant for @xmath107 ( except for small lattice sizes @xmath108 ) . as is well - known from earlier works @xcite , the energy density decreases as @xmath109 , which is the scaling behavior of a free - streaming expansion . in fact the energy density multiplied by the time , @xmath110 , saturates at a time @xmath111 ( which is sometimes called the formation time , i.e. the time at which partons are freed from the wave - function of the nuclei ) where the free - streaming expansion starts . this is natural on physical grounds , because the classical fields keep interacting strongly until @xmath111 , and become quasi - free at @xmath112 . we see that the longitudinal chromo - electric and chromo - magnetic fields behave in the same way , which is the characteristic feature of the glasma initial state @xcite . in our convention @xmath65 , @xmath113 , @xmath66 , and @xmath114 are all approaching a common value for @xmath115 , and the system still remains anisotropic ( isotropy requires that @xmath116 and @xmath117 ) . this becomes clearer if we consider the transverse pressure @xmath69 and the longitudinal one @xmath118 defined in eqs . and , respectively , as shown in fig . [ fig : p ] . then , we can find that @xmath119 and @xmath120 both approach an asymptotic value and @xmath120 is much smaller than @xmath119 . if @xmath118 is exactly zero , this means that the system reaches the limit of the free - streaming expansion leading to @xmath121 . if the system is completely thermalized , on the other hand , the pressure must be isotropic and thus @xmath71 . because an expansion with positive @xmath118 produces work against the expansion of the matter , the energy density decreases faster than in the free - streaming case , e.g. @xmath122 if @xmath123 and if the expansion is purely longitudinal ( i.e. bjorken expansion ) . therefore , the ( leading order ) glasma state alone can not reach isotropization ; a candidate for causing the longitudinal pressure to grow is the instability due to the @xmath12-dependent fluctuations that occur in higher order corrections . let us now consider the time evolution of the spectral composition of the energy content . that is , the energy is written in terms of fourier components as @xmath124 in terms of the continuum variables . if written in terms of the lattice variables , the transverse momenta take discrete values @xmath125 and the integration is replaced by a summation over @xmath126 . the energy density in the mode @xmath127 is given by @xmath128\bigr\rangle , \label{eq : ee_k}\\ \varepsilon_{_b}(k_\perp ) & \equiv \bigl\langle { \mathrm{tr}}\bigl [ b^{\eta a}(-{\boldsymbol{k}_\perp})b^{\eta a}({\boldsymbol{k}_\perp } ) + \tau^{-2}\bigl ( b^{ia}(-{\boldsymbol{k}_\perp})b^{ia}({\boldsymbol{k}_\perp } ) \bigr ) \bigr]\bigr\rangle\ ; , \label{eq : eb_k}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath129 , @xmath130 , @xmath131 , and @xmath132 are the fourier transforms of the chromo - electric and chromo - magnetic fields . the above expressions are given in terms of the continuum variables , but it is non - trivial how to re - express them in terms of the link variables : equation for the chromo - electric component is not changed , but we can not use eq . as it is and @xmath114 in eq . are perfectly fine to calculate the chromo - magnetic energy the problem is that they are not simply a sum of squares . ] . it is of course possible to introduce the chromo - magnetic field using the relation in such a way that @xmath133 \notag\\ b_{x}^a & = f_{\eta y}^a \approx \frac{2}{{\mathrm{i}}g a_\eta}{\mathrm{tr}}\bigl [ t^a \bigl ( 1-u_{\eta y } \bigr ) \bigr]\ ; , \quad b_{y}^a = f_{\eta x}^a \approx \frac{2}{{\mathrm{i}}g a_\eta}{\mathrm{tr}}\bigl [ t^a \bigl ( 1-u_{\eta x } \bigr ) \bigr]\ ; . \label{eq : approxb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this approximation works for sufficiently large number of the transverse sites , i.e. @xmath134 . then , we in principle have two options here : we abandon the information on @xmath135 and just evaluate @xmath136 to see the spectral pattern , or , we adopt a sufficiently large value of @xmath13 so that we can use the approximation . in this work we take the former option , because simulations with @xmath134 would be too time - consuming in the forthcoming studies that include @xmath12-dependent fluctuations ( and where one thus needs to solve ( @xmath137 ) dimensional equations ) . at @xmath138 , the initial spectrum is calculable analytically in the mv model , leading to the expression @xcite , @xmath139 , \label{eq : ee_pert}\ ] ] with an ir cutoff @xmath140 . this formula means that @xmath136 behaves as @xmath141 at large @xmath127 , which is the expected perturbative tail . at @xmath142 , @xmath143 , @xmath144 , and @xmath145 . the transverse size is chosen as @xmath146 and the mv model parameter as @xmath147 . the spectrum at @xmath142 shows the perturbative scaling @xmath148 . an ensemble average is taken over @xmath86 configurations.,scaledwidth=49.0% ] at non - zero @xmath14 , we have evaluated @xmath136 numerically , with results shown in fig . [ fig : time - trans ] . to draw the figure , we have calculated @xmath149 first as a function of @xmath150 and @xmath151 and then have taken an average over the results that lie in a bin , @xmath152 , to obtain @xmath136 with @xmath153 . we use logarithmic horizontal and vertical axes in the plot of fig . [ fig : time - trans ] , to facilitate the identification of the initial - time power - law scaling in the spectrum . we can notice that the energy spectrum at the initial time @xmath142 ( where we started the simulation ) obeys the perturbative scaling @xmath154 up to the uv - cutoff , as indicated by a line for eye guide in fig . [ fig : time - trans ] in agreement with the perturbative expression in eq . . the spectral shape quickly approaches the asymptotic one within @xmath155 and it hardly changes after that time . in fact the shape at @xmath156 is already close to that at @xmath157 ( where we stopped the simulation ) . thanks to this , we do not show the results at any intermediate time between @xmath156 and @xmath157 in order to keep the plot legible . in later discussions in the section [ sec : lspectrum ] we will perform a similar analysis in the longitudinal direction to find non - trivial asymptotic behavior of the spectral shapes . after this summary of the boost - invariant results , including the time evolution of the energy spectrum , let us proceed with the analysis of the instability with respect to @xmath12-dependent fluctuations . we will first confirm the existence of the instability in a similar setup as the one used in previous studies . for this purpose , we choose the initial fluctuations according to the prescription used in refs . @xcite and we fix the mv model parameter @xmath103 in the same way as in the boost - invariant situation . we take the extent in the @xmath12 direction to be @xmath158 units of rapidity and we use periodic boundary conditions for @xmath12 as well as for transverse coordinates . we note that this extent covers roughly the mid - rapidity region where the boost - invariant plateau is expected , and therefore it is legitimate to have a boost - invariant background . that is , our parameter choice reads ; @xmath159 and we perform calculations at various values of the transverse grid size @xmath13 and the longitudinal grid size @xmath17 later . introducing an arbitrary function @xmath160 , we can write the @xmath12-dependent chromo - electric fields in such a way that gauss s law is satisfied by construction , @xmath161\ , \xi^i({\boldsymbol{x}_\perp } ) \ ; , \label{eq : deltaei}\\ \delta e^\eta(x ) & = -f(\eta)\sum_{i = x , y } \bigl [ u_i^\dagger(x-\hat{i})\xi^i({\boldsymbol{x}_\perp}-\hat{i})u_i(x-\hat{i } ) -\xi^i({\boldsymbol{x}_\perp } ) \bigr]\;. \label{eq : deltaeeta}\end{aligned}\ ] ] before applying eq . we can also add @xmath12-dependent fluctuations in @xmath162 . for the moment we will discuss the case with @xmath163 and @xmath164 only . here the choice of @xmath165 is arbitrary and we choose it as a random variable in the transverse plane , i.e.@xmath166 it is important to note that @xmath167 has the dimension of a momentum , which is obvious from the above equation . if all the dimensional quantities are scaled with the transverse spacing @xmath36 as is the case in the numerical implementation , @xmath167 scales as @xmath168 , which is artificial . the strength of the longitudinal disturbance should be given independently . to cancel this artificial @xmath36 dependence , we use a dimensionless @xmath169 satisfying @xmath170 ( on the lattice ) and make @xmath160 scale as @xmath171 , so that the fluctuations are proportional overall to @xmath172 which is a constant . in the literature @xcite @xmath160 is chosen as a random variable too containing all infrared and ultraviolet modes in the spectrum . here , in order to study the instability behavior in a well - controlled situation , let us perturb the system with a single @xmath12-mode , and consider superposition of multiple modes only later . hence , we will adopt the following simple form for the moment , the frequency @xmath21 is an integer between @xmath22 and @xmath23 . ] , @xmath173 where @xmath174 is chosen to be @xmath70 as we explained before and @xmath20 should scale as @xmath175 to make the fluctuations insensitive to the way we discretize the transverse plane . we will later fix @xmath176 and then vary @xmath13 to study the ( unphysical ) dependence on the transverse grid size . here we fix @xmath177 in eq . because , as we will confirm later , this lowest non - zero mode leads to the fastest and strongest growth in the longitudinal pressure . figure [ fig : size_t ] shows how the instability occurs in the longitudinal pressure @xmath118 in the long - time run . the left - panel is the pressure multiplied by time ( @xmath178 ) in the unit of @xmath179 . we note that the plotted quantity is for @xmath180 which maximizes the fourier transform of @xmath120 ( except for the zero mode @xmath181 ) . that is , we define , @xmath182 which is complex valued in general in our definition ranges from @xmath22 to @xmath183 and the corresponding wave - number is @xmath184 . ] . we thus plot its modulus , @xmath185 , in the left panel of fig . [ fig : size_t ] corresponding to an initial disturbance at @xmath177 and @xmath186 in eqs . and ( i.e. we choose @xmath187 as a reference point and then @xmath188 for @xmath187 ) . the horizontal axis represents @xmath189 , which is a natural variable in a longitudinally expanding geometry . note that the fourier transform @xmath190 at finite @xmath18 is not a measurable quantity in experiments . its real and imaginary parts both fluctuate from negative to positive values depending on the initial conditions and they would be vanishing if we compute an average without taking the modulus . only the @xmath181 mode has a physical meaning as the longitudinal pressure . for our purpose of studying the instability , we can nevertheless consider @xmath191 ( i.e. we compute the modulus first , and we perform the average over initial conditions next ) in order to confirm some known results reported previously @xcite . in later discussions , we will also decompose the energy density into @xmath18 components , which is a more well - defined quantity to see the instability . , where @xmath177 is chosen for the initial condition . the results are for @xmath105 , @xmath93 , @xmath92 , @xmath192 , @xmath193 in the transverse direction ( from the top to the bottom ) and @xmath194 fixed in the longitudinal direction ( except for @xmath195 for @xmath75 and @xmath196 for @xmath197 ) . the seed magnitude is @xmath188 for @xmath187 , i.e. @xmath186 in eq . . an ensemble average is taken over @xmath198 configurations . right : spectrum of the longitudinal `` pressure '' as a function of @xmath18 at @xmath199 ( @xmath200).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] , where @xmath177 is chosen for the initial condition . the results are for @xmath105 , @xmath93 , @xmath92 , @xmath192 , @xmath193 in the transverse direction ( from the top to the bottom ) and @xmath194 fixed in the longitudinal direction ( except for @xmath195 for @xmath75 and @xmath196 for @xmath197 ) . the seed magnitude is @xmath188 for @xmath187 , i.e. @xmath186 in eq . . an ensemble average is taken over @xmath198 configurations . right : spectrum of the longitudinal `` pressure '' as a function of @xmath18 at @xmath199 ( @xmath200).,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] from the left panel of fig . [ fig : size_t ] , the exponential growth with the square root of proper time is obvious . the onset of the instability depends on the transverse size @xmath13 but the instability slope is rather insensitive to @xmath13 . with increasing @xmath13 , the instability occurs earlier , and eventually the shift in this onset position saturates for @xmath201 . this means that the instability does not start earlier by increasing @xmath13 further . so , we stop increasing @xmath13 and conclude that simulations at @xmath187 are reasonably close to the continuum limit . in the right panel , we see how the fields , initially localized in the modes @xmath202 ( background field itself ) and @xmath203 ( perturbation ) , populate the higher @xmath18 modes due to the non - linearities in the yang - mills equations . for a small perturbation , the amplitude in the higher modes decreases very fast ( exponentially with @xmath18 ) , because in order to produce a field at a given @xmath18 , one needs to multiply @xmath18 seeds at @xmath177 . . the results are for @xmath188 and @xmath187 fixed in the transverse direction and @xmath194 and @xmath204 in the longitudinal direction . an ensemble average is taken over @xmath198 configurations . right : spectrum of the longitudinal `` pressure '' as a function of @xmath18 at @xmath199.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] . the results are for @xmath188 and @xmath187 fixed in the transverse direction and @xmath194 and @xmath204 in the longitudinal direction . an ensemble average is taken over @xmath198 configurations . right : spectrum of the longitudinal `` pressure '' as a function of @xmath18 at @xmath199.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] physical results must also not depend on how we discretize the longitudinal coordinate . in order to see the dependence on the longitudinal grid size , we make a plot in fig . [ fig : size_l ] in the same way as in fig . [ fig : size_t ] , where we compare two longitudinal grid sizes that differ by a factor @xmath70 . as is clear from fig . [ fig : size_l ] we can not find any sizable dependence on @xmath17 , which means that our numerical calculations are safely free from lattice artifacts in the longitudinal direction . the influence of @xmath17 can be seen more clearly in the spectrum of @xmath205 shown in the right panel of fig . [ fig : size_l ] . a different choice of @xmath17 with fixed @xmath174 changes the uv cutoff ( the spectrum ranges between @xmath22 and @xmath23 ) : in the right panel of fig . [ fig : size_l ] , @xmath18 varies from @xmath206 to @xmath207 for the @xmath194 calculation and from @xmath208 to @xmath209 for the @xmath204 calculation . since the seeds are at @xmath180 in our initial condition , we naturally anticipate that the uv cutoff at @xmath210 does not affect physical properties around @xmath211 . one may think that the results for a larger seed amplitude @xmath212 in fig . [ fig : size_l ] could be sensitive to the choice of @xmath17 because all the amplitudes in the spectrum are substantially larger and thus a change in @xmath17 leading to a change in the uv cutoff may have an influence on the spectrum . we have also checked this and found that it is not the case . as is clear from fig . [ fig : size_l ] , the difference between the results for @xmath213 with @xmath212 and that for @xmath214 with @xmath212 is almost invisible . from all these results we can conclude that a value of @xmath194 is sufficiently large as long as @xmath21 is set to be of order unity . if @xmath21 takes a larger value , as we will see soon below , the spectral shape has a wider distribution and the uv cutoff at @xmath210 could influence the results . . the results are for @xmath215 , @xmath216 , @xmath217 and a fixed lattice size @xmath213 . right : spectrum of the longitudinal `` pressure '' as a function of @xmath18 at @xmath199 , which has a uv cutoff at @xmath218 for the @xmath194 calculation.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] . the results are for @xmath215 , @xmath216 , @xmath217 and a fixed lattice size @xmath213 . right : spectrum of the longitudinal `` pressure '' as a function of @xmath18 at @xmath199 , which has a uv cutoff at @xmath218 for the @xmath194 calculation.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] in this subsection , we study the dependence on the seed magnitude @xmath20 of the longitudinal fluctuations in eq . . in fig . [ fig : magnitude ] , we show some of numerical results for different values of @xmath20 . it is interesting that the results obviously scale as @xmath219 up to the point where the instability growth eventually saturates . this @xmath20 dependence is almost trivial , which suggests that the non - linear effects in terms of finite-@xmath18 modes are small unless the unstable modes substantially develop at large @xmath95 . one might have thought that any physical observables should be expanded in even powers of @xmath20 and thus @xmath220 should be proportional @xmath221 rather than @xmath20 . this is not the case because we took the modulus of complex @xmath222 before performing the average over initial conditions , thus preventing the linear term in @xmath20 from vanishing . we can also notice from the right panel of fig . [ fig : magnitude ] that , once the instability at @xmath223 gets saturated , the mode at @xmath223 stops growing but the spectrum spreads quickly to higher @xmath18-modes . once this happens , the scaling property with @xmath20 is lost . actually the amplitude of the @xmath223 mode reaches one third of the zero - mode amplitude ( for @xmath212 results at @xmath199 ) before this saturation occurs . then the non - linearities or self - interaction effects can not be neglected any longer . now we investigate the @xmath21-dependence of the instability behavior . first , we have chosen three different @xmath21 s as @xmath177 , @xmath224 , and @xmath225 to uncover the general trend . then we study a more general case , that consists in a superposition of these initial wave - numbers . , @xmath224 , and @xmath225 with the initial condition given as a superposition . right : spectrum of the longitudinal `` pressure '' as a function of @xmath18 at @xmath199 . the solid line represents the results from the non - linear evolution with the initial condition given as a superposition , while the dotted one is a simple linear superposition of the results shown in fig . [ fig : nu].,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] , @xmath224 , and @xmath225 with the initial condition given as a superposition . right : spectrum of the longitudinal `` pressure '' as a function of @xmath18 at @xmath199 . the solid line represents the results from the non - linear evolution with the initial condition given as a superposition , while the dotted one is a simple linear superposition of the results shown in fig . [ fig : nu].,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] , @xmath224 , and @xmath225 with the initial condition given as a superposition . right : spectrum of the longitudinal `` pressure '' as a function of @xmath18 at @xmath199 . the solid line represents the results from the non - linear evolution with the initial condition given as a superposition , while the dotted one is a simple linear superposition of the results shown in fig . [ fig : nu].,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] , @xmath224 , and @xmath225 with the initial condition given as a superposition . right : spectrum of the longitudinal `` pressure '' as a function of @xmath18 at @xmath199 . the solid line represents the results from the non - linear evolution with the initial condition given as a superposition , while the dotted one is a simple linear superposition of the results shown in fig . [ fig : nu].,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] the figure [ fig : nu ] shows the numerical results . it is clear from the figure that the onset of the instability is delayed for larger @xmath21 . this is naturally understandable from the kinetic term for finite-@xmath18 modes . the ( positive ) kinetic term generally tends to stabilize the system , and so the ( negative ) term responsible for the instability is overwhelmed if @xmath18 is large enough . for dimensional reasons , however , this kinetic term for the finite-@xmath18 modes is of the form @xmath226 , and therefore it decreases with time . in contrast , the negative term that generates the instability has a constant coefficient of order unity therefore , it dominates over the kinetic term at sufficiently large time . in other words , the kinetic term in @xmath226 only delays the start of the instability by a time proportional to @xmath18 . we can confirm qualitatively this interpretation from fig . [ fig : nu ] . the growth appears to start around @xmath227 for @xmath228 , respectively , and the starting times are indeed ordered proportionally to @xmath21 . the spectral shape shown in the right panel of fig . [ fig : nu ] looks discontinuous for @xmath229 and @xmath225 , but this is a trivial artifact of the fact that our initial seed contains a single @xmath21 mode . indeed , the non - linear couplings in the yang - mills equations can only produce linear combinations with integer coefficients of the frequencies present in the initial condition . for instance , with @xmath229 , only modes with @xmath18 a multiple of @xmath224 can be produced by the non - linear evolution . the fact that the amplitude if these higher harmonics is suppressed compared to the amplitude of the base frequency @xmath21 is a good indication that we are still in a regime where the non - linearities are rather small . we can also see that the non - linear effects are certainly present but not very large by repeating the above calculation with an initial condition given as a superposition of three modes , namely , @xmath230 with @xmath231 , @xmath232 , @xmath233 , instead of the single - mode fluctuation of eq . with @xmath177 , @xmath229 , @xmath234 individually . if the non - linearity is significant , the results should not be a simple superposition of the individual calculation . in view of fig . [ fig : nu_mix ] , however , we can see only small deviations from the individual results shown in fig . [ fig : nu ] at @xmath199 . this is an important observation because the initial fluctuations in reality should have some continuous spectral distribution ( see ref . @xcite for instance ) and we simplified our analysis by considering the special case of a single - mode fluctuation . as long as the non - linearity is a minor effect , we can just add up the single - mode outputs in order to get approximate results for general initial spectra . although they are several orders of magnitude smaller at @xmath199 , we see that higher harmonics mixing the three @xmath21 s are enhanced by non - linear effects in the right panel of fig . [ fig : nu_mix ] . for instance , the amplitude of the mode @xmath235 is much larger than the sum of the amplitudes at @xmath235 for the three seeds considered in isolation . indeed , when the seed @xmath177 is alone for example , the mode @xmath235 is produced only after 20 interactions , which explains why it is totally negligible . furthermore , the seeds @xmath229 or @xmath225 can never lead to @xmath235 by themselves . when the three seeds are superposed in the initial condition , 21 can be reached more efficiently as @xmath236 , i.e. with 2 interactions only . apart from small non - linear effects , it is certainly true that the smallness of the field fluctuations we have considered gives a justification for our simplified , single mode , analysis . however , at the same time , thermalization is hardly expected to occur in these circumstances , precisely because in this regime the interaction effects are small . in realistic conditions , the parameter @xmath20 that controls the fluctuations is related to the strong coupling @xmath9 , and therefore it could be larger than @xmath237 that we have considered here . as a consequence , we expect that the non - linearities would start much sooner and be much more important in applications of this framework to actual heavy - ion collisions . the study with such large @xmath20 is beyond our current scope because a large @xmath20 requires full information on quantum fluctuations and needs appropriate renormalization procedures , which is technically involved @xcite . in spite of the instability the zero - mode is still dominant among all the modes in @xmath190 . with an initial condition that contains a single mode as in eq . , the @xmath180 mode is the second largest , which is obvious from the spectrum shown in the right panel of fig . [ fig : size_t ] . moreover , the spectrum is spreading into higher wave - numbers as the time elapses . in this section , we shall discuss the scaling property of the energy spectrum with respect to the frequency @xmath18 , and show that it possibly displays also a kolmogorov s turbulent spectrum . a turbulent spectrum has already been reported in the context of the qcd plasma instability @xcite , but these results with the power @xmath238 instead of @xmath239 are in conflict with kolmogorov s wave turbulence . on the other hand , the study performed in ref . @xcite has shown that a kolmogorov spectrum appears due to instabilities in yang - mills theory , for a fixed - volume system . therefore , it is still worth addressing the turbulent spectrum in the present glasma simulation , that has longitudinal expansion . this is because the glasma system is expanding along the beam axis , which tends to tame the turbulences and to delay the isotropization or thermalization in general . it is thus non - trivial whether the universal scaling still holds or not in the expanding system . besides , our description of the glasma evolution is purely classical and the precise relationship between the glasma instability and the qcd plasma instability is not fully understood yet . . the lattice size is @xmath213 and the seed is @xmath188 . left : results at early times up to @xmath240 . note that the horizontal axis is not logarithmic and also that the vertical axis is for not @xmath241 but @xmath242 ( see the text for details ) . right : results at later times up to @xmath243.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] . the lattice size is @xmath213 and the seed is @xmath188 . left : results at early times up to @xmath240 . note that the horizontal axis is not logarithmic and also that the vertical axis is for not @xmath241 but @xmath242 ( see the text for details ) . right : results at later times up to @xmath243.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=49.0% ] two plots in fig . [ fig : time - scale - long ] show the longitudinal energy spectrum ( for the chromo - electric part only ) , that is , the energy density decomposed in terms of the longitudinal wave - number @xmath18 as @xmath244 with @xmath245\bigr\rangle .\ ] ] ( the transverse momentum @xmath246 of the fields is integrated over . ) the question is then what kind of scaling spectrum we can expect for @xmath247 at later times . for this purpose , we consider three characteristic quantities ; the wave - number , the fourier decomposed energy , and the rate of energy flow in @xmath18-space ( denoted by @xmath248 below ) . the wave - number @xmath18 itself is , however , dimensionless and it seems difficult to cope with the dimensional matching argument by kolmogorov . we propose that one should use a scaled variable @xmath249 instead of @xmath18 , in the case of an expanding geometry . this is because @xmath250 is approximately equal to the longitudinal coordinate @xmath251 if @xmath12 is small enough , and @xmath249 is approximately equal to the momentum @xmath252 . then , the dimension of the scaled wave - number is @xmath253=l^{-1}$ ] . we note that the integration variable in the decomposition should also be @xmath254 for this scaling analysis , which means that the relevant energy density per mode should be @xmath255 . this in addition should be multiplied by the expanding length @xmath256 . therefore , the dimensions of the three relevant quantities are @xmath257 = l^{-1 } , \qquad [ v_\perp(c\tau)^2\varepsilon_{_e}(\nu ) ] = l^3 t^{-2 } , \qquad [ \psi ] = l^2 t^{-3 } , \ ] ] which are identical to the standard analysis of kolmogorov s spectrum . provided that @xmath258 is expressed in a form of @xmath259 , we can fix @xmath260 and @xmath261 uniquely from the dimensions and thus expect the kolmogorov scaling , that is , @xmath262 . in fact we can confirm this scaling property asymptotically from the right panel of fig . [ fig : time - scale - long ] . one might be wondering what the fate of the power - law spectrum should be at even later times . we understand from fig . [ fig : stage ] that the glasma time evolution in the present mv - model simulation has three stages ; the linear regime , the non - linear regime , and the uv - cutoff regime . in the linear regime the unstable modes grow up and the non - linear effects are still minor . when the amplitudes of @xmath263 modes become so large that the non - linearities can affect the time evolution , the instability stops , as shown in the right panel of fig . [ fig : stage ] , and the non - abelianization occurs @xcite . because non - linearities are no longer negligible in this regime , the energy cascade due to non - linearities is naturally expected , which would lead to the kolmogorov - type spectrum . eventually , as the turbulence decays into higher uv modes , the uv - cutoff effect flattens the whole spectrum as plotted in fig . [ fig : stage ] up to @xmath264 . up to @xmath264 . left : results including later time spectra . the horizontal axis is logarithmic to make it evident how the power - law spectrum spreads . right : longitudinal `` pressure '' with three regimes identified schematically.,scaledwidth=49.0% ] to the best of our knowledge the present work is the first to exhibit a kolmogorov spectrum from the glasma time evolution . our results imply that the framework of the glasma , in terms of classical variables together with @xmath12-dependent fluctuations , may encompass a rich physics contents including the qcd plasma instability . here , as a final remark in this section , we draw attention to related works in analogous systems . in the context of an ultra - cold gas , the kolmogorov spectrum has been obtained as a solution of the gross - pitaevskii equation ( gpe ) , which is a classical equation of motion like the glasma equations @xcite . the calculational procedure by means of the gpe is similar to the glasma simulation , but in that case the microscopic mechanism of the energy flow is understood in terms of the vortex dynamics . in future studies on the glasma dynamics , it will be important to clarify the structure of the energy flow , and it would be very interesting to see whether the so - called non - thermal fixed point @xcite appears in the strongly correlated yang - mills theory and glasma . indeed , a possible deviation in the power could be expected in yang - mills theory by non - perturbative resummations @xcite . in this paper we investigated the time evolution of the classical equations of motion in the su(2 ) pure yang - mills theory , especially in the framework of the glasma or the mclerran - venugopalan model in ( 3 + 1 ) dimensions . our emphasis has been put on the systematic study of the instability behavior that occurs in fluctuations with respect to the space - time rapidity @xmath12 when the initial conditions break boost invariance . computing the longitudinal pressure component at non - zero wave - number @xmath18 , that is a conjugate of @xmath12 , we have numerically confirmed the glasma instability that had been found in preceding works @xcite . we carefully checked the system size dependence of the instability to conclude that the glasma instability is a robust consequence from @xmath12-dependent disturbances and is not sensitive to how the transverse and longitudinal coordinates are discretized . hence , the glasma instability is certainly a physically well - defined phenomenon . at the same time , however , this means that taking the continuum limit does not help with an earlier onset of the instability . the typical time scales we found for the glasma instability is of order of hundreds in terms of @xmath95 , which is arguably too slow for being useful in heavy ion collisions . one should however keep in mind that the seeds we have used in this numerical study are very small compared to the glasma fields , while in a realistic situation they are suppressed at most by a power of the strong coupling constant . there may also be a chance that the non - linear effects could more or less accelerate the instability . we compared two results for the spectral distribution , one from the superposition of individual calculations with the initial condition that is given by a different wave - number @xmath21 , and the other from a single calculation with the initial condition that contains all @xmath21 s . we could observe the non - linear effects in our numerical results , which would not affect the instability behavior substantially , however , as long as the instability seed @xmath20 is reasonably small . we have decomposed the energy density into fourier modes to see how the low wave - number modes cascade toward higher wave - number modes due to non - linearity in the equations of motion . our motivation to do so is to examine whether the so - called kolmogorov s scaling can appear in the turbulent system described by the yang - mills theory put in an expanding geometry . in contrast to the boost - invariant case , a kolmogorov - type scaling behavior in the energy spectrum a function of the longitudinal wave - number @xmath18 may appear when the boost invariance is broken by the initial fluctuations . in this case , the violation of boost invariance increases with time due to instability , but the @xmath181 mode remains very large compared to the other @xmath263 modes , which enables us to regard the @xmath181 mode as the source for the energy injection . then , we could clearly observe that the energy spectra approach an asymptotic form that shows the kolmogorov s scaling with the power @xmath265 . as far as we know , our work is the first example that exhibits the kolmogorov - type scaling law in the expanding systems . although it is difficult to find any indication that the system indeed becomes isotropic and thermalized in our simulation , the confirmation of the kolmogorov - type spectra is a promising signal for the general tendency heading for thermalization . there remain very interesting questions to be investigated in the future . in order to unveil the microscopic mechanism for the instability , it would be very useful to make approximations on the classical equations of motion in such a way that the analytical treatment could be feasible . for instance , as we have confirmed , the instability mostly lies in the linear regime as long as its magnitude specified by @xmath20 is small enough . therefore the linearization of the equations of motion in terms of fluctuating fields on top of the boost - invariant cgc background should correctly describe the instability in early times . in this work we did not exploit such a comparison between the numerical output and the analytical result from the linearized equations . this is because it is not quite efficient to linearize the equations of motion given in terms of the lattice variables . the linearization is of course possible , but it would eventually be reduced to similar calculations in the continuum formulation . then , it would make much more sense to make a comparison between the numerical and analytical results that are both formulated in the continuum variables . we have already executed test programs to make sure if the numerical results from the glasma simulations are consistent with each other , given they are written in terms of lattice and continuum variables . we will report on this analysis elsewhere . it is also an intriguing question to look for a link between kolmogorov s turbulent spectrum and the chaotic behavior generally seen in the solution of the classical yang - mills equations . this problem may have some relevance for a deeper understanding of the microscopic description of the entropy generating process and how the thermalization is achieved at all . the time evolution of the glasma and its physics contents deserve much more investigations in the future . we would like to thank kevin dusling , tuomas lappi , and raju venugopalan for discussions . this work has been supported in part by jsps japan - france integrated action program ( sakura ) . thanks the yukawa institute for theoretical physics , where part of this work has been done , for its hospitality and support . p. f. kolb and r. rapp , `` transverse flow and hadrochemistry in au+au collisions at @xmath266 , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.67.044903[_phys . rev . _ * c67 * ( 2003 ) 044903 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0210222 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0210222 [ hep - ph ] ] . r. baier , a. h. mueller , d. schiff , and d. t. son , `` bottom - up thermalization in heavy ion collisions , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(01)00191-5[_phys . lett . _ * b502 * ( 2001 ) 5158 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0009237[arxiv:hep-ph/0009237 ] . y. v. kovchegov , `` can thermalization in heavy ion collisions be described by qcd diagrams ? , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.08.009[_nucl . _ * a762 * ( 2005 ) 298325 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0503038[arxiv:hep-ph/0503038 ] . b. arnold , j. lenaghan , and g. d. moore , `` qcd plasma instabilities and bottom up thermalization , '' _ jhep _ * 0308 * ( 2003 ) 002 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0307325[arxiv:hep-ph/0307325 [ hep - ph ] ] . erratum added online , sep/29/2004 . b. arnold , j. lenaghan , g. d. moore , and l. g. yaffe , `` apparent thermalization due to plasma instabilities in quark - gluon plasma , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.072302[_phys . * 94 * ( 2005 ) 072302 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0409068 [ arxiv : nucl - th/0409068 [ nucl - th ] ] . p. b. arnold , g. d. moore , and l. g. yaffe , `` the fate of non - abelian plasma instabilities in 3 + 1 dimensions , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.72.054003[_phys . * d72 * ( 2005 ) 054003 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0505212 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0505212 [ hep - ph ] ] . p. b. arnold and g. d. moore , `` qcd plasma instabilities : the nonabelian cascade , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.73.025006[_phys . rev . _ * d73 * ( 2006 ) 025006 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0509206[arxiv:hep-ph/0509206 [ hep - ph ] ] . j. randrup and s. mrowczynski , `` chromodynamic weibel instabilities in relativistic nuclear collisions , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.68.034909[_phys . rev . _ * c68 * ( 2003 ) 034909 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0303021[arxiv:nucl-th/0303021 ] . s. mrowczynski , `` instabilities driven equilibration of the quark - gluon plasma , '' _ acta phys . * b37 * ( 2006 ) 427454 , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0511052[arxiv:hep-ph/0511052 ] . a. dumitru , y. nara , and m. strickland , `` ultraviolet avalanche in anisotropic non - abelian plasmas , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.75.025016[_phys . rev . _ * d75 * ( 2007 ) 025016 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0604149 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0604149 [ hep - ph ] ] . j. berges , d. gelfand , s. scheffler , and d. sexty , `` simulating plasma instabilities in su(3 ) gauge theory , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.05.008[_phys . * b677 * ( 2009 ) 210213 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.3859[arxiv:0812.3859 [ hep - ph ] ] . d. bodeker , `` the impact of qcd plasma instabilities on bottom - up thermalization , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/092[_jhep_ * 0510 * ( 2005 ) 092 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0508223 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0508223 [ hep - ph ] ] . a. rebhan , p. romatschke , and m. strickland , `` hard - loop dynamics of non - abelian plasma instabilities , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.102303[_phys . lett . _ * 94 * ( 2005 ) 102303 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0412016[arxiv:hep-ph/0412016 ] . a. rebhan , p. romatschke , and m. strickland , `` dynamics of quark - gluon plasma instabilities in discretized hard - loop approximation , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/09/041[_jhep_ * 09 * ( 2005 ) 041 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0505261[arxiv:hep-ph/0505261 ] . p. romatschke and a. rebhan , `` plasma instabilities in an anisotropically expanding geometry , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.97.252301[_phys . _ * 97 * ( 2006 ) 252301 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0605064[arxiv:hep-ph/0605064 ] . a. rebhan , m. strickland , and m. attems , `` instabilities of an anisotropically expanding non - abelian plasma : 1d+3v discretized hard - loop simulations , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.78.045023[_phys . rev . _ * d78 * ( 2008 ) 045023 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.1714 [ arxiv:0802.1714 [ hep - ph ] ] . a. ipp , a. rebhan , and m. strickland , `` non - abelian plasma instabilities : su(3 ) vs. su(2 ) , '' http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.0298[arxiv:1012.0298 [ hep - ph ] ] . b. muller and a. trayanov , `` deterministic chaos in nonabelian lattice gauge theory , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.68.3387[_phys * 68 * ( 1992 ) 33873390 ] . t. s. biro , c. gong , and b. muller , `` lyapunov exponent and plasmon damping rate in nonabelian gauge theories , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.52.1260[_phys . * d52 * ( 1995 ) 12601266 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9409392[arxiv:hep-ph/9409392 ] . t. kunihiro _ et al . _ , `` chaotic behavior in classical yang - mills dynamics , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.82.114015[_phys . rev . _ * d82 * ( 2010 ) 114015 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.1156[arxiv:1008.1156 [ hep - ph ] ] . a. nishiyama and a. ohnishi , `` entropy production in gluodynamics in temporal axial gauge in 2 + 1 dimensions , '' _ prog . * 125 * ( 2011 ) 775795 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.4750[arxiv:1011.4750 [ nucl - th ] ] . p. m. chesler and l. g. yaffe , `` horizon formation and far - from - equilibrium isotropization in supersymmetric yang - mills plasma , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.102.211601[_phys . * 102 * ( 2009 ) 211601 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2053 [ arxiv:0812.2053 [ hep - th ] ] . p. m. chesler and l. g. yaffe , `` boost invariant flow , black hole formation , and far - from - equilibrium dynamics in n = 4 supersymmetric yang - mills theory , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.82.026006[_phys . rev . _ * d82 * ( 2010 ) 026006 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.4426 [ arxiv:0906.4426 [ hep - th ] ] . y. v. kovchegov and s. lin , `` toward thermalization in heavy ion collisions at strong coupling , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/jhep03(2010)057 [ _ jhep _ * 03 * ( 2010 ) 057 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.4707[arxiv:0911.4707 [ hep - th ] ] . v. balasubramanian _ et al . _ , `` thermalization of strongly coupled field theories , '' http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.4753[arxiv:1012.4753 [ hep - th ] ] . f. gelis , t. lappi , and r. venugopalan , `` high energy scattering in quantum chromodynamics , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218301307008331 [ _ int.j.mod.phys . _ * e16 * ( 2007 ) 25952637 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0047[arxiv:0708.0047 [ hep - ph ] ] . l. d. mclerran and r. venugopalan , `` computing quark and gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.49.2233[_phys . rev . _ * d49 * ( 1994 ) 22332241 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9309289[arxiv:hep-ph/9309289 ] . l. d. mclerran and r. venugopalan , `` gluon distribution functions for very large nuclei at small transverse momentum , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.49.3352[_phys * d49 * ( 1994 ) 33523355 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9311205[arxiv:hep-ph/9311205 ] . l. d. mclerran and r. venugopalan , `` fock space distributions , structure functions , higher twists and small x , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.59.094002[_phys . rev . _ * d59 * ( 1999 ) 094002 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9809427[arxiv:hep-ph/9809427 ] . a. kovner , l. d. mclerran , and h. weigert , `` gluon production from nonabelian weizsacker - williams fields in nucleus - nucleus collisions , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.52.6231[_phys . rev . _ * d52 * ( 1995 ) 62316237 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9502289[arxiv:hep-ph/9502289 ] . a. kovner , l. d. mclerran , and h. weigert , `` gluon production at high transverse momentum in the mclerran - venugopalan model of nuclear structure functions , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.52.3809[_phys . _ * d52 * ( 1995 ) 38093814 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9505320[arxiv:hep-ph/9505320 ] . d. son , `` semiclassical approach for multiparticle production in scalar theories , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(96)00386-0[_nucl . phys . _ * b477 * ( 1996 ) 378406 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9505338[arxiv:hep-ph/9505338 [ hep - ph ] ] . a. mueller and d. son , `` on the equivalence between the boltzmann equation and classical field theory at large occupation numbers , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.12.047[_phys . _ * b582 * ( 2004 ) 279287 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0212198 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0212198 [ hep - ph ] ] . a. krasnitz and r. venugopalan , `` non - perturbative computation of gluon mini - jet production in nuclear collisions at very high energies , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00366-1[_nucl . _ * b557 * ( 1999 ) 237 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9809433[arxiv:hep-ph/9809433 ] . a. krasnitz and r. venugopalan , `` the initial energy density of gluons produced in very high energy nuclear collisions , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.84.4309[_phys . * 84 * ( 2000 ) 43094312 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9909203[arxiv:hep-ph/9909203 ] . a. krasnitz and r. venugopalan , `` the initial gluon multiplicity in heavy ion collisions , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.86.1717 [ _ phys . * 86 * ( 2001 ) 17171720 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0007108[arxiv:hep-ph/0007108 ] . t. lappi , `` production of gluons in the classical field model for heavy ion collisions , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.67.054903[_phys . * c67 * ( 2003 ) 054903 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0303076[arxiv:hep-ph/0303076 ] . t. lappi and l. mclerran , `` some features of the glasma , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.04.001[_nucl . phys . _ * a772 * ( 2006 ) 200212 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0602189[arxiv:hep-ph/0602189 ] . a. dumitru , f. gelis , l. mclerran , and r. venugopalan , `` glasma flux tubes and the near side ridge phenomenon at rhic , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.06.012[_nucl . phys . _ * a810 * ( 2008 ) 91108 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.3858 [ arxiv:0804.3858 [ hep - ph ] ] . k. dusling , f. gelis , t. lappi , and r. venugopalan , `` long range two - particle rapidity correlations in a+a collisions from high energy qcd evolution , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.12.044 , 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.12.044[_nucl . phys . _ * a836 * ( 2010 ) 159182 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2720[arxiv:0911.2720 [ hep - ph ] ] . p. romatschke and r. venugopalan , `` collective non - abelian instabilities in a melting color glass condensate , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.062302[_phys . _ * 96 * ( 2006 ) 062302 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0510121[arxiv:hep-ph/0510121 ] . p. romatschke and r. venugopalan , `` the unstable glasma , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.74.045011[_phys . rev . _ * d74 * ( 2006 ) 045011 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0605045[arxiv:hep-ph/0605045 ] . k. fukushima , `` initial fields and instability in the classical model of the heavy - ion collision , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.76.021902[_phys . _ * c76 * ( 2007 ) 021902 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3625[arxiv:0704.3625 [ hep - ph ] ] . k. fukushima , `` erratum : initial fields and instability in the classical model of the heavy - ion collision , '' http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.2634[arxiv:0711.2634 [ hep - ph ] ] . h. fujii and k. itakura , `` expanding color flux tubes and instabilities , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.05.016[_nucl . phys . _ * a809 * ( 2008 ) 88109 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0410[arxiv:0803.0410 [ hep - ph ] ] . h. fujii , k. itakura , and a. iwazaki , `` instabilities in non - expanding glasma , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.06.020 [ _ nucl . phys . _ * a828 * ( 2009 ) 178190 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.2930[arxiv:0903.2930 [ hep - ph ] ] . k. dusling , t. epelbaum , f. gelis , and r. venugopalan , `` role of quantum fluctuations in a system with strong fields : onset of hydrodynamical flow , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.11.009[_nucl . _ * a850 * ( 2011 ) 69109 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.4363[arxiv:1009.4363 [ hep - ph ] ] . k. fukushima , f. gelis , and l. mclerran , `` initial singularity of the little bang , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.01.086[_nucl . _ * a786 * ( 2007 ) 107130 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0610416[arxiv:hep-ph/0610416 [ hep - ph ] ] . f. gelis and r. venugopalan , `` particle production in field theories coupled to strong external sources , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.07.020[_nucl . * a776 * ( 2006 ) 135171 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0601209 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0601209 [ hep - ph ] ] . f. gelis and r. venugopalan , `` particle production in field theories coupled to strong external sources . ii . generating functions , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.08.015[_nucl . phys . _ * a779 * ( 2006 ) 177196 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0605246 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0605246 [ hep - ph ] ] . f. gelis , s. jeon , and r. venugopalan , `` how particles emerge from decaying classical fields in heavy ion collisions : towards a kinetic description of the glasma , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.11.011 [ _ nucl . phys . _ * a817 * ( 2009 ) 6189 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3775[arxiv:0706.3775 [ hep - ph ] ] . t. lappi , `` energy density of the glasma , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2006.10.017[_phys . lett . _ * b643 * ( 2006 ) 1116 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0606207[arxiv:hep-ph/0606207 ] . e. iancu , k. itakura , and l. mclerran , `` a gaussian effective theory for gluon saturation , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0375-9474(03)01477-5 [ _ nucl . * a724 * ( 2003 ) 181222 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0212123[arxiv:hep-ph/0212123 ] . a. krasnitz , y. nara , and r. venugopalan , `` gluon production in the color glass condensate model of collisions of ultrarelativistic finite nuclei , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0375-9474(03)00636-5[_nucl.phys._ * a717 * ( 2003 ) 268290 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0209269 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0209269 [ hep - ph ] ] . a. krasnitz , y. nara , and r. venugopalan , `` classical gluodynamics of high - energy nuclear collisions : an erratumn and an update , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.08.004[_nucl.phys._ * a727 * ( 2003 ) 427436 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0305112 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0305112 [ hep - ph ] ] . h. fujii , k. fukushima , and y. hidaka , `` initial energy density and gluon distribution from the glasma in heavy - ion collisions , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.79.024909[_phys . rev . _ * c79 * ( 2009 ) 024909 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.0437 [ arxiv:0811.0437 [ hep - ph ] ] . j. berges , s. scheffler , and d. sexty , `` turbulence in nonabelian gauge theory , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.10.032[_phys . _ * b681 * ( 2009 ) 362366 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.4293[arxiv:0811.4293 [ hep - ph ] ] . j. berges , a. rothkopf , and j. schmidt , `` non - thermal fixed points : effective weak - coupling for strongly correlated systems far from equilibrium , '' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.101.041603[_phys . lett . _ * 101 * ( 2008 ) 041603 ] , http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0131 [ arxiv:0803.0131 [ hep - ph ] ] . Abstract:
[ "we extensively study the growing behavior of the energy and the pressure components depending on the space - time rapidity in the framework of the glasma , which describes the early - time dynamics in the ultra - relativistic heavy - ion collisions . we simulate the glasma solving the classical equations of motion in the su(2 ) yang - mills theory and systematically investigate the dependence of the glasma instability on the model parameters . we have checked that the transverse and longitudinal grid sizes in our simulation are large enough to handle cutoff effects under control . by comparing the numerical results from several initial conditions with different magnitudes of instability seed and also those with different wave - numbers for rapidity fluctuations , we clearly see that unstable modes dominantly grow up in the linear regime and we also confirm non - linear effects in the time evolution . to extract more detailed information on the evolving glasma , we decompose the energy into the components in terms of rapidity wave - numbers . we observe an energy flow from low wave - number modes into higher wave - number modes due to non - linearity in the equations of motion . we find that the energy spectrum approaches an asymptotic scaling that is consistent with kolmogorov s power - law form even in the expanding system of the glasma . and color glass condensate , glasma , relativistic heavy - ion collision , instability , kolmogorov spectrum" ]
12,774
12,774
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: perturbative methods are indispensable in order to establish consistent theories of particle interactions , and to predict quantitatively their experimental manifestations . the anticipation of new phenomena in modern experiments and theoretical extensions of the standard model , requires cross - sections for complicated processes . this has driven a remarkable progress in the development of new computational methods . at the one - loop level , the calculation of cross - sections with five external legs is gradually becoming a routine activity ( e.g. @xcite ) . at two - loops , there have been recent successful computations of amplitudes with four external legs and up to three kinematic scales ( e.g. @xcite ) . at three - loops and beyond , amplitudes with up to one parametric variable have also been computed ( e.g. @xcite ) . many new processes with higher final - state multiplicity , number of loops , and kinematic scales , have been identified to be important at the tev energy frontier . the aim of our paper is to provide a new method which can be used to compute loop amplitudes for such , more complicated , processes . loop integrations are cumbersome due to the presence of infrared singularities . loop integrals with many kinematic scales have , in addition , a complicated analytic structure with respect to their kinematic parameters . the tensor structure in gauge theories is also an issue , since it proliferates the number of terms . a general method for computing arbitrary loop integrals should extract their infrared and ultraviolet singularities , and treat simply kinematic discontinuities and threshold singularities . for practical applications , it should also be able to handle tensor integrals efficiently . there is no method which addresses satisfactorily all these issues ; known techniques can compute a limited number of amplitudes where some simplifications occur in special cases . following a traditional approach to calculate loop amplitudes , one reduces the number of terms to a few master integrals and computes the latter analytically . one - loop integrals can be reduced using the classical method of passarino and veltman @xcite . for generic multi - loop computations one can derive reduction identities from integration by parts @xcite and the invariance of scalar integrals under lorentz transformations @xcite . there is a large variety of approaches for evaluating the master integrals analytically . for example , one can compute integrals with a simple singularity structure and a small number of kinematic scales by integrating directly their feynman parameter representation . for more complicated cases one can use advanced techniques , such as the method of differential equations @xcite . this approach can fail , however , if we apply it to complicated processes . the reduction algebra is hard , and the expressions of amplitudes in terms of master integrals may have spurious singularities which hamper their numerical evaluation . the extraction of @xmath1 poles in the master integrals , the evaluation of the coefficients of the @xmath1-expansion in terms of known analytic functions , and the analytic continuation of the latter to physically interesting kinematic regions are also involved . it is , thus , very well motivated to improve or replace the `` traditional scheme '' and to develop new automated methods . one - loop amplitudes can be entirely determined in four dimensions in terms of basic functions such as logarithms and polylogarithms that appear in the one - loop scalar box . new methods introduce sophisticated algorithms for the reduction to the basic functions ; by either numerical or analytical techniques , they control the appearance of spurious singular terms and minimize the size of the intermediate expressions @xcite . recently , cross - sections for @xmath2 processes at nlo were computed @xcite using such techniques . a method , which is inspired by techniques for real radiation at nlo , renders one - loop graphs numerically integrable @xcite with the introduction of universal subtraction terms . a different approach uses unitarity , dualities , and analyticity properties for the determination of one - loop amplitudes @xcite . beyond one - loop , there has been a significant progress in the automation of the reduction methods to master integrals @xcite . the infrared structure of multi - loop integrals is substantially more complex than at one - loop ; the development of methods for their numerical evaluation is more difficult . nevertheless , there is significant progress in this direction @xcite . a powerful numerical method for multi - loop calculations is the method of sector decomposition @xcite ; it simplifies recursively the singularities of feynman parameterizations and allows a straightforward expansion in @xmath1 . the method of sector decomposition has been very succesfully employed in the computation of several multi - leg integrals at one , two and three loops @xcite . this method has been introduced , recently , for the purely numerical evaluation of multi - loop amplitudes @xcite . however , it is perplexing how to apply it for loop - integrals in non - euclidean regions . in 1999 , smirnov @xcite and , soon later , tausk @xcite , introduced a new method for the evaluation of loop integrals . in their pioneering papers , smirnov and tausk @xcite computed analytically the first infrared divergent double box integrals . in @xcite new two - loop integrals for @xmath3 massless processes were computed . in @xcite the method was applied to double - box integrals with one additional mass - scale . the method was spectacularly applied in the computation of three - loop amplitudes @xcite in @xmath4 supersymmetric yang - mills theory , shedding light to novel cross - order perturbative relations of the theory @xcite . the smirnov - tausk method is based on a few simple ideas . starting from the feynman parameterization of a loop integral we can derive a new representation in terms of a multiple complex contour integral . such , mellin - barnes ( mb ) , parameterizations have enabled compicated loop calculations by using powerful methods for complex integration @xcite . smirnov and tausk exploited a novel property of these representations . infrared divergences localize on simple poles inside the complex integration volume . we can isolate the divergent pieces of the integral at @xmath5 , by using the cauchy theorem . after subtracting the divergent residues , we can perform a taylor expansion in @xmath1 , and sum up the remaining infinite series of residues . finally , we can work to derive analytic expressions for the infinite sums in the coefficients of the expansion in terms of logarithms , generalized polylogarithms @xcite , and more complicated functions . the smirnov - tausk method is very powerful ; however , it is laborious and intricate . the isolation of the divergent residues in multiple mellin - barnes integrals is convoluted . in addition , it is difficult to identify infinite sums in terms of polylogarithm functions with known analyticity properties . as a consequence , the analytic continuation in physical kinematic regions is also involved . due to these complications , the method has been applied to a few master integrals with a small number of kinematic scales . in this paper , we generalize the method to a broader spectrum of applications . as a first task , we automate the procedure for the isolation of the divergent residues at @xmath0 . smirnov @xcite and tausk @xcite use different techniques for finding these residues . the approach of smirnov is very intuitive , but daedal . we have found that the technique described by tausk in ref . @xcite resembles closely to a programmable algorithm . we have used it as a guide and we have written computer programs which subtract the @xmath6 poles in arbitrary mellin - barnes integrals . in our method , we avoid entirely the painstaking tasks of finding analytic expressions for infinite sums in terms of polylogarithms , and performing the analytic continuation in the arguments of polylogarithms . mellin - barnes representations are valid in kinematic regions where loop integrals may be complex - valued . we have found that , in a broad spectrum of applications , it is simple to calculate the representations numerically . the only analytic continuation that is ever required is that of logarithms with a single kinematic scale as an argument . an important goal of our method is to calculate loop amplitudes in realistic gauge theories . we have found that tensor integrals and , furthermore , diagrams which belong to the same topology can be calculated collectively . as we will show , the integrand of a representation for a scalar integral will be a product of gamma functions and powers of kinematic invariants , while that of a generic tensor will be the same integrand as in the scalar integral multiplied by a polynomial in the integration variables . the evaluation of polynomials is fast in a numerical program ; the computational cost for evaluating tensor integrals or loop diagrams is not significantly larger than evaluating scalar integrals . the only practical issue that we need to address , is the book - keeping of the various terms that contribute to the polynomial ; we present an efficient solution of this problem here . in this paper , we apply our method to a number of examples . we , first , test our method in scalar and tensor integrals of the one - loop massless hexagon topology . the purpose of this computation is to introduce our method for tensor integrals and to demonstrate that we can tackle problems which are relevant in computations of physical amplitudes . we present here results for tensors through rank six , in both the euclidean and the physical region for @xmath7 processes . the numerical programs that we have constructed are suitable for the evaluation of the qcd amplitudes in four - jet production at hadron colliders . in the second set of examples , we compute scalar two and three - loop integrals which are known analytically in all kinematic regions : the massless planar @xcite and cross @xcite double - box , the massless double - box with one off - shell leg @xcite , and the massless planar triple - box @xcite . they serve to cross - check our algorithms and to demonstrate that we can easily reproduce state - of - the - art computations . our numerical results are in excellent agreement with the analytic expressions . we also present a number of new results that would require significant efforts for their computation with traditional approaches . we present , for the first time , double - box integrals with up to four kinematic parameters , and triple - box integrals with up to three kinematic parameters computed in all physical regions . in section [ sec : mbrepresentations ] , we explain our technique for deriving mellin - barnes representations for loop integrals . in section [ sec : analytic ] , we describe our routines for performing an @xmath1-expansion of mellin - barnes representations for scalar integrals . we extend these results to loop integrals with tensor numerators in section [ sec : tensors ] and , in section [ sec : numerical ] , we present our methods for the numerical integration . section [ sec : results ] is devoted to present our results for several integrals at the one , two and three loop level . finally we present our conclusions . we start with a brief discussion on the derivation of mellin - barnes representations for loop integrals from their feynman parameterization . the construction of parameterizations is not unique , and various representations of the same integral may have quite different features . for example , they could have a different integral dimensionality , or they could be better or worse suited for numerical evaluation . a valid parameterization , however , can always be found . a pedagogical introduction to the topic of mellin - barnes representations is presented in ref . @xcite . as a concrete example we consider the one - loop box integral with two adjacent external legs off - shell and massless propagators , @xmath8 with @xmath9 and @xmath10 , @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 . the powers of the propagators @xmath15 and the dimension @xmath16 are kept arbitrary and we will derive a mellin - barnes parameterization of the box - integral in this general case . in this section , we will seek values for @xmath17 where the representation is well defined and the integral is finite . in the next section , we will explain the technique for the analytic continuation to the values of the parameters , such as @xmath18 , where the integral develops divergences . our starting point is the feynman parameterization of the box integral : @xmath19 with @xmath20 . the main tool for obtaining the mellin - barnes representation of the above integral is the formula : @xmath21 where the following conditions are satisfied : 1 . @xmath22 are complex numbers with @xmath23 , 2 . the contour of integration is a straight line parallel to the imaginary axis separating the poles of @xmath24 and @xmath25 , i.e. @xmath26 . we can use the identity of eq . [ eq : mbrep ] to simplify the entangled denominator of eq . [ eq : box_2m_fp ] , with the cost of introducing new integrations in the complex plane . before we do so , we would like to point out an attractive feature of eq . [ eq : mbrep ] . the above two conditions guarantee that the integrand in the right hand side of eq . [ eq : mbrep ] vanishes at infinity . we can then close the contour of integration at infinity and calculate the integral using the cauchy theorem . if we close the contour to the side of the positive real - axis we obtain @xmath27 this is the taylor expansion of the left hand side of eq . [ eq : mbrep ] in the region @xmath28 . equivalently , by closing the contour of integration to the side of the negative real axis , we obtain a taylor expansion in the complementary region @xmath29 . this is a particularly useful property : representations of feynman integrals which are derived by using the mellin - barnes decomposition are valid in all kinematic regions . in addition , @xmath22 can be complex ; therefore , we can account for the infinitesimal imaginary part @xmath30 that is assigned to invariant masses and kinematic parameters . 3 may be recursively applied to denominators with more than two terms , yielding : @xmath31 we are now ready to apply the decomposition of eq . [ eq : mbrep_multi ] to the denominator of eq . [ eq : box_2m_fp ] , introducing three contour integrations : @xmath32 where the contours must satisfy condition 2 above , i.e. they must be chosen in such a way that the arguments of the gamma functions are all positive . it is now straightforward to integrate out the feynman parameters , using @xmath33 to exchange the order of integrations , we must assume that the exponents of the feynman parameters satisfy @xmath34 with these conditions the gamma functions on the right hand side of eq.[eq : int_feynman ] have arguments with positive real part as well . the final result is : @xmath35 where @xmath36 and we have adopted the shorthand notation @xmath37 in general , mellin - barnes representations for a loop - integral are well defined for number of dimensions and powers of propagators which render the real parts of the arguments in all gamma functions positive . for example , it is impossible to satisfy positivity in all gamma function arguments for @xmath38 . this is in accordance with the expectation that the scalar box integral is infrared divergent in four dimensions . but , for example , the representation of eq . [ eq : box_2m_mb ] is well defined if we choose the contour @xmath39 and the parameters @xmath40 . in the next section we will detail the analytic continuation from values of parameters for which the mellin - barnes representation is well - defined to values for which the integral develops divergences . that is , a procedure which makes the divergences appear explicitly in the form of poles in the parameter space . from eq . [ eq : box_2m_mb ] we observe that it is simple to implement the analytic continuation of kinematic parameters in a numerical evaluation , since they always appear in a factorized form , e.g. @xmath41 we need the analytic continuation of simple logarithms ; these are evaluated trivially in all kinematic regions : @xmath42 it is clear from the above example that we can derive a mellin - barnes representation for any integral starting from its feynman parameterization . the form of the parameterization depends on the choice of feynman parameters , the order in which the @xmath43 terms appear in the right hand side of eq . [ eq : mbrep_multi ] , and the implementation of the delta function constraint for the feynman parameters . this arbitrariness is more pronounced beyond one - loop . in section [ sec : tensors ] we will derive representations for tensor one - loop integrals which simplify their numerical evaluation . we aim to find similarly simple representations for multi - loop tensor integrals as well . for this purpose , it is convenient to use the one - loop representations as building blocks , by employing a re - insertion technique @xcite . we explain this technique in our second example . we now derive a mellin - barnes representation for the massless planar double - box integral with two adjacent legs off - shell . the integral is defined : @xmath44 with @xmath45 and @xmath10 , @xmath11 , @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath14 . for simplicity , we have set the powers of propagators to one . we perform , first , the @xmath46-loop integral and derive the representation for this integral reading it off from the one - loop result of eq . [ eq : box_2m_mb ] , @xmath47 the off - shell legs of the @xmath46-loop box correspond to the @xmath48 propagators while the @xmath49 invariant mass gives rise to a new propagator for the second integration : @xmath50 the propagators @xmath51 form a new one - loop box with two adjacent legs off - shell , and we can read off , once again , the representation for this second integration using eq . [ eq : box_2m_mb ] . the final result for the two - loop box with two adjacent legs off - shell is : @xmath52 we have produced a representation for a two - loop integral by embedding representations for one - loop integrals into other representations . it is obvious that we can use the re - insertion method for writing representations for arbitrary multi - loop integrals . representations for integrals with given kinematic scales can be used to derive , easily , results for simpler integrals where some of the scales are taken to zero . let us , for illustration , derive the representation for the double - box with one - leg off - shell and the on - shell double - box . we must first take the limit @xmath53 in eq . [ eq : dbox_2m_mb ] . the term @xmath54 is vanishing in this limit unless @xmath55 at the same time . if we use the cauchy theorem , we find that the wanted limit is given by taking the residue of the integrand at @xmath56 . therefore , the double - box with one - leg off - shell is : @xmath57 similarly , the on - shell double - box is given by : @xmath58 note that , in order to have a finite limit for a vanishing kinematic scale , the mellin - barnes representation should have terms in the integrand which behave as @xmath59 . these emerge naturally in non - trivial representations due to eq . [ eq : mbrep ] . in the previous section we have noted that the mellin - barnes representation of a loop integral is valid if appropriate poles of the gamma functions lay separated on the right and left of the integration contours . this condition guarantees the equivalence between the mellin - barnes integral and the original denominator in the loop integral . it often occurs that this condition can not be satisfied for values of the dimension parameter and the powers of the propagators which are relevant for a realistic application . let us consider , as an example , the one - loop box representation of eq . [ eq : box_2m_mb ] in the case of powers of propagators set to unity and the dimension in @xmath16 , @xmath60 this representation can only be valid for values of @xmath1 different from zero . for example , if we choose the contour @xmath61 we find that @xmath1 should be in the interval @xmath62 . we can use the cauchy theorem to obtain a representation in terms of a sum of contour integrals , which is valid at @xmath63 and the @xmath6 poles appear explicitly . the key point is that if the value of @xmath1 is chosen outside the allowed region , for example @xmath63 , some of the poles of the gamma functions will be on the wrong side of the contours ( see fig . [ fig : pole_pos ] ) . to recover the original result , we must compare the position of the poles relative to the contours for values of @xmath1 inside the allowed region and the point outside . depending whether the poles crossed the contours from left or right , we should correct the representation by adding or subtracting the residue of the integrand on those poles . this simple observation can be easily cast into general purpose algorithms which extract the poles in @xmath1 of arbitrary mellin - barnes representations . , and some of the poles cross to the other side of the contour . to recover a valid representation for the loop - integral , these poles sould be isolated using the cauchy theorem . , height=151 ] let us choose a value of @xmath1 inside the allowed region and observe the position of the poles with respect to the contours for some @xmath1-dependent gamma functions in our example . the poles of @xmath64 and @xmath65 , at @xmath66 and @xmath67 , are situated to the right of the @xmath68 and @xmath69 contours , respectively , for all non - negative integers @xmath70 . let us now take @xmath0 . we observe that the first poles , for @xmath71 , moved to new positions , @xmath72 and @xmath73 , which are on the left side of the contours . the poles for @xmath74 remain on the right side . therefore , the representation is not valid at @xmath75 , since the contours separate poles which originate from the same gamma function . to obtain a valid expression for the integral at @xmath76 , we need to use the cauchy theorem to isolate the crossing poles ( @xmath71 ) . smirnov , in ref . @xcite , provides a number of pedagogical examples where this is done . the approach of smirnov is to deform the multiple contours , using the cauchy theorem , so that the `` offending '' poles never cross the contour of integration . tausk , in ref . @xcite , describes in detail this task as well , using as an explicit example the mellin - barnes representation for the two - loop cross box integral . the technique of tausk is different from the one of smirnov ; the main idea is to account for the poles that end up on the `` wrong '' side of the contour in a progressive way , as they cross the contours when changing continuously the value of @xmath1 . in this paper , we have followed the approach of tausk . we would like to recommend that the interested reader studies the pedagogical example of ref . @xcite . here we discuss our implementation of the algorithm which is depicted in the flow diagram of figure [ fig : flow1 ] . consider the mellin - barnes representation @xmath77 of a loop integral . the integrand of @xmath77 depends initially on gamma functions . the application of the analytic continuation algorithm requires the iterative evaluation of residues . these may also give rise to psi functions , which have poles in the same positions the gamma functions do , and are treated identically for the purposes of analytic continuation . the contours @xmath78 of the representation are straight lines parallel to the imaginary axis , and are chosen so that the real parts of the arguments of all gamma functions are positive . the same condition determines an allowed region for @xmath1 , which we will assume that includes the point @xmath79 . for the sake of clarity , we will consider the case @xmath80 , but the method proceeds analogously when @xmath81 . the first step is to find the maximum value @xmath82 , with @xmath83 , for which the representation holds . at this value , one or some of the positions of the poles run into a contour . if the set of these poles , @xmath84 , is empty , i.e. no poles cross the contours when moving @xmath1 from @xmath85 to 0 , then the integral can be safely expanded around @xmath63 . so , let us focus on the more interesting case in which @xmath84 is non empty . here we have to distinguish between @xmath86 and @xmath87 . if @xmath86 , at least one pole lies on the contours for the terminating value of @xmath1 . then , the representation has an unregulated singularity , and it is not feasible to perform an @xmath1 expansion and evaluate the contour integrals numerically . to remedy the situation we must change the contour of integration ; we use the cauchy theorem and displace one or more of the contours parallel to the imaginary axis . then , we attempt afresh the analytic continuation ; the poles should now hit the contour at @xmath87 . if this does not happen , due to an unfortunate choice of the contour we displaced , we simply iterate the procedure until we succeed . when @xmath88 , we have to determine the residues in the poles that cross the contour . if there is only one pole in @xmath84 the situation is simple . let us look back at the specific example of the one - loop box . by applying the previous steps of the algorithm , we find that the first pole to cross a contour is at @xmath89 . we then choose one of the multiple integrals , e.g. the @xmath69 integral , and subtract the residue of the integrand on this pole , at @xmath90 , to the representation : @xmath91 the residue term in the above expression is a new multiple mellin - barnes integral with one integration variable less than in @xmath77 . in our example , the pole crosses the @xmath69 contour from the right side and we subtract its residue from the original representation . if a pole crosses the contour from the left , we should add its residue . at this point , we have achieved the analytic continuation in @xmath1 from @xmath85 to @xmath92 . we now repeat the algorithm setting as initial value @xmath93 , and perform the analytic continuation to the next value of @xmath1 where a new crossing occurs . we proceed iteratively , until we find all poles which cross the contours of integration in the terms of eq . [ eq : ancont ] and its descendants . the algorithm is more complicated if many poles cross simultaneously the contour at @xmath82 . in our one - loop box example , if we had chosen a symmetric contour @xmath94 then we would have two poles crossing at the same time : @xmath95 . one way to deal with this situation is to displace the contours in such a way that the degeneracy is removed , i.e. introduce asymmetric contours from the beginning . another alternative is to take combined residues in all the poles . to correctly account for all the terms in this case , we can imagine that the contours are only slightly displaced from their current position . then the poles will hit them one at the time and we can take residues successively . finally , we can restore the original position of the contours without affecting the position of the poles . there is , however , a caveat in taking multiple residues . let us consider the case of the one - loop box , where the poles @xmath96 and @xmath97 hit the contour at the same time . we take residues in sequence , considering first @xmath98 . we make the `` unfortunate '' choice to take the residue on the @xmath99 integration variable , and not on @xmath68 . the analytic continuation yields : @xmath100 then we consider the crossing of the @xmath101 pole on each of the two terms on the right hand side of the above expression . we find no problems in taking the residue of the first term . however , the position of the @xmath101 pole for the second term is now written : @xmath102 the pole @xmath101 is now independent of @xmath1 and gets nailed to the contour . this situation is similar to the one we encountered for @xmath86 , and we can deal with it in exactly the same way by displacing the contours . we apply the algorithm recursively , to all the terms which are generated by adding the residues of crossing poles to the original parameterization . at the end of this procedure , we obtain a sum of contour integrals plus some terms that do not contain any remaining integral due to taking residues on all integration variables . the method assures that the sum of all these contributions equals the original loop integral when @xmath103 . so we can expand in a power series of @xmath1 . in this section , we have presented the algorithm assuming that only the dimension parameter @xmath1 is required to regulate the mellin - barnes parameterization . however , the method proceeds identically for integrals where multiple analytic regulators are required . this could be the case in non - covariant gauges or in integrals with irreducible numerators @xcite or additional positive powers of propagators @xcite . the actual implementation of the algorithm in a set of routines in both maple and mathematica is very efficient , and allows to perform the analytic continuation in the regulator parameters in a few seconds , for all the mellin - barnes representations that we have studied in this paper . mellin - barnes representations , with the exception of the massless two - loop diagonal box topology @xcite , have been traditionally employed for the evaluation of master integrals . in this section , we introduce an efficient generalization of the method to tensor integrals ; our method does not require any reduction techniques to master integrals . common reduction methods produce extremely large algebraic expressions which may also have spurious singular denominators . here we derive efficient representations for one - loop tensor integrals , which are amenable to numerical integration . we can derive analogous representations for multi - loop integrals by using the re - insertion method of section [ sec : mbrepresentations ] . we consider a generic one - loop tensor integral of rank @xmath104 with @xmath70 external legs : @xmath105 \left [ ( k+q_2)^2-m_2 ^ 2 \right ] \cdots \left [ ( k+q_n)^2-m_n^2 \right ] } \,\ ] ] where , @xmath106 and @xmath107 are external incoming momenta . we first introduce feynman parameters for the denominator . we obtain , @xmath108^n}\,,\ ] ] where @xmath109 and @xmath110\ ] ] now we perform the usual shift in the loop momentum , @xmath111 , and we obtain , @xmath112 } } { ( k^2-\delta)^n}\ , , \ ] ] where , we denote @xmath113 } = \sum_{\{j_1,\ldots , j_m\ } } k^{\mu_{j_1}}\cdots k^{\mu_{j_r } } p^{\mu_{j_{r+1}}}\cdots p^{\mu_{j_m } } , \\ & & \hspace{2 cm } \{j_1,\ldots , j_m\ } \in \mbox{permutations}(1,\ldots , m ) \nonumber . \end{aligned}\ ] ] we find the standard feynman representation for the generic tensor one - loop @xmath70-point function , by integrating the loop momentum : @xmath114 } \delta^{\frac{r}{2 } } , \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath115 for @xmath116 odd , and @xmath117}$ ] for @xmath116 even . we observe that the sum , in the second line of the equation , is a polynomial in the feynman parameters , with tensor coefficients : @xmath118 } \delta^{\frac{r}{2 } } = \sum_{\{\nu_i > 0 \ } } c(\{\nu_i\ } ; \{p_i^{\mu_j}\ } ) x_1^{\nu_1 - 1}\cdots x_n^{\nu_n-1}\ ] ] for the scalar integral with unit powers of propagators , this sum is @xmath119 . we will use eq . [ eq : tensor - feynf ] to derive mellin - barnes representations for the tensor loop - integral . we would like to exploit the fact that the feynman representation of the scalar and tensor integrals have the same denominator : @xmath120 in section [ sec : mbrepresentations ] , we have seen that we can obtain a mellin - barnes representation for a loop integral by decomposing the denominator of the feynman parameterization with eq . [ eq : mbrep_multi ] . we should anticipate that the mellin - barnes representations of tensors and scalars are , therefore , very similar . we can verify this intuition , if we consider one generic term in the polynomial of eq . [ eq : fp_polynomial ] , and follow the steps of section [ sec : mbrepresentations ] . decomposing the denominator with eq . [ eq : mbrep_multi ] , we obtain @xmath121 where @xmath122 is the number of kinematic scales @xmath123 in the integral . the factors @xmath124 are universal for all terms in eq . [ eq : fp_polynomial ] , and originate from the dependence of @xmath125 on the feynman parameters . we now proceed to integrate out the feynman parameters using eq . [ eq : int_feynman ] . this integration yields gamma functions @xmath126 rewriting all gamma functions as above in eq . [ eq : fp_polynomial ] , we obtain , for the tensor integral , the gamma functions of the scalar integral multiplied by simple factors with mellin - barnes integration variables . the result for the one - loop tensor integrals depends on the topology and the rank of the tensors in a rather complicated manner . however , we find that the representation is of the following form @xmath127 the first line of the above representation contains all the terms which already appear in the analogous representation of the scalar integral with unit powers of propagators . the function @xmath128 is a _ polynomial in the mellin - barnes variables _ , with tensor coefficients in terms of the external momenta . this is very important for our strategy to evaluate tensor integrals and feynman diagrams . the polynomial in the numerator is smooth , and it does not affect the analytic continuation in @xmath1 . we can therefore perform the continuation collectively for all tensor integrals and diagrams of the same topology . we organize the evaluation of tensor integrals and diagrams of a topology as follows . we first find the mellin - barnes parameterization of the scalar integral of the topology , and multiply the integrand with a template function @xmath129 which we assume depends on all mellin - barnes variables . then , we apply the analytic continuation algorithm of section [ sec : analytic ] keeping @xmath130 general . we expand in @xmath1 , and create numerical programs for the evaluation of the expansion for any smooth function @xmath130 . this part of the evaluation needs to be performed only once for a given topology . then we must identify the polynomial for the evaluation of the specific tensors or diagrams that we are interested in . we have written form @xcite and mathematica programs which perform the steps that we described in this section , and derive the explicit functional form of the polynomials in eq . [ eq : tensor_mbrep ] . we then write numerical routines for their evaluation , and link them to the general routines for the @xmath1 expansion of the integrals of the topology . this approach is efficient for the application of our technique to tensor integrals . it turns out , however , that the expressions for the polynomials are quite long for high rank tensors . we have observed that we can reduce the size of the expressions substantially with a simple modification . the terms @xmath131 in eq . [ eq : tensor - feynf ] are lengthy , and when we integrate out the feynman parameters they give rise to large expressions in @xmath128 of eq . [ eq : tensor_mbrep ] . we rewrite eq . [ eq : tensor - feynf ] in a different way , @xmath132 } \,\end{aligned}\ ] ] then , we introduce a mellin - barnes decomposition for each denominator : @xmath133 and integrate out the feynman parameters . at the end of this procedure , we obtain a sum of @xmath134 + 1 $ ] mellin - barnes integrals for a tensor of rank @xmath104 . all integrals correspond to the mellin - barnes representation of the scalar integral with shifted dimension @xmath135 . each of them has a different polynomial @xmath136 in the numerator . however , these are substantially shorter than the polynomial @xmath128 in eq . [ eq : tensor_mbrep ] . it is worth to note that , with our method , we never introduce spurious singularities . the evaluation of the higher rank tensors and diagrams in gauge theories is very efficient , since we never require the manipulation of lengthy expressions . the polynomials @xmath136 can be large , however , they require a minimum amount of handling before generating numerical codes for their evaluation . here we have presented the derivation of efficient representations for one - loop integrals . the method may be applied to multi - loop integrals using the one - loop tensor integral representations as building blocks . the analogous functions of @xmath136 in multi - loop tensors contain gamma functions in the denominator . however , they are smooth and maintain the properties which are required for a collective evaluation of all tensors of a topology . explicit applications with multi - loop tensor integrals will be examined in future work . after analytic continuation , the contour integrals can be safely expanded in power series of @xmath1 . the coefficients of the expansion are also contour integrals which , in general , contain in their integrand gamma functions , gamma function derivatives , simple logarithms , and powers of the kinematic parameters . in earlier works , these integrals were computed analytically . the standard approach is to evaluate them by means of the residue theorem , i.e. summing an infinite number of residues and expressing the power series as logarithms , polylogarithms and harmonic polylogarithms . this method is cumbersome for the evaluation of integrals with more than one mellin - barnes variable . in all cases presented in the literature , integrals with more than one dimension are reduced to one - dimensional integrals with a variety of clever , however not general , tricks . typical procedures include direct integration in simple situations , the application of barnes lemmas @xcite , and the expansion in laurent series around an integer value of one of the variables . in a few cases , a careful inspection of the multi - dimensional integrals reveals exact cancellations between different components which yield significant simplifications . many integrals which are relevant for physical applications , such as the massless double box with two external legs off - shell and one - loop tensor integrals with six external legs , after the analytic continuation in @xmath1 , are expressed in terms of hundreds of mellin - barnes components ; some of them have a very high dimensionality . the analytic methods are not suitable for such problems . in our method , we choose to evaluate the mb integrals numerically by direct integration over the contours . the procedure we follow is , conceptually , straightforward . in practice , the implementation of the numerical evaluation requires a significant work in automating the book - keeping of the various terms . tensor integrals require significantly more complex book - keeping due to large expressions that multiply the gamma functions in the integrand of their mellin - barnes representation . our computer programs are organized in the following way . we first use maple , form @xcite , and mathematica routines to derive mellin - barnes representations for the integrals that we need to compute . we then perform the analytic continuation of section [ sec : analytic ] , and we expand the integrands in powers of @xmath1 using maple and mathematica . as the next step , we translate the integrands into fortran routines which evaluate them as complex quantities . there are many options to calculate numerically the sum of the mellin - barnes integrals which emerge from the routines for the @xmath1 expansion . for example , we can combine all contributions in a single common integrand , so that large numerical cancellations take place before integration . however , the finding of the peaks and the adaptation of the integration routines become less efficient . following a diametric approach , we could integrate all components separately and compute their sum at the end . then , the adaptation of the numerical integration is optimal , however , the numerical precision is sensitive to cancellations . in practice , we follow a hybrid approach and group together integrals with equivalent contours . we have achieved a reasonable efficiency and speed for all the computations that we present in this paper . since we aim to keep our integration method general , we do not attempt any special simplifications by , for example , applying barnes lemmas or exploiting symmetries of particular contours . for the numerical integration , we maintain the contours as straight lines parallel to the imaginary axis . we map them onto a real interval with a simple transformation , @xmath137 in all cases that we have considered , the integrands vanish rapidly when the integration variables take values away from the real line @xmath138 . the mellin - barnes integrals do not present problematic numerical instabilities , and converge rather fast . we perform the multidimensional integrations using the cuhre and vegas routines of the cuba library @xcite . to gain some speed , we integrate the real and imaginary parts of the integrals concurrently , using the same grid . the grid is adapted to the peaks of the real part , however , the quality of the integration for the imaginary part is only mildly affected . on the other hand , there is another subtle point concerning the convergence of the imaginary parts . as they always start an order later in the expansion in @xmath1 , the analytic expressions for them would be simpler than the corresponding real ones . when integrating numerically this relative simplicity is reflected by a faster convergence when compared to the real pieces at the same order . the numerical results depend on the values for the kinematic scales of the integrals . with our approach , we use the same expressions for the evaluation of the integrals in all kinematic regions . as we explained earlier , the only analytic continuations in kinematic variables that we must perform , is for simple functions of the type @xmath139 and @xmath140 . these are implemented trivially , in a branched format , in numerical programs . in this paper , we present multi - loop integrals for fixed kinematic parameters . however , we have arranged our routines so that a numerical integration over the phase - space can be performed simultaneously with the mellin - barnes integrations . a problematic case for our numerical algorithms is the evaluation of loop integrals with massive internal propagators in non - euclidean kinematic regions . typically , mellin - barnes represenations for such integrals exhibit a very slow damping at @xmath141 in physical regions . the mapping of the integration region to a finite interval that we have considered in eq . [ eq : mapping ] is not adequate , and contour deformations together with more sophisticated algorithms for the evaluation of oscillatory integrals are required . we defer the study of such situations for a future project . we have achieved a full automatization of the code generation for the numerical evaluation . this has allowed us to apply our method to diverse problems . our approach can be improved and refined further in the future by considering , for example , a clever analysis of the terms before integration in order to avoid numerical cancellations or more sophisticated mappings which can smoothen the peak structure of the integrands . however , as we will see in the rest of the paper , our first , naive , implementation is already sufficient to obtain accurate results for complicated integrals in a reasonable time . in what follows we present results for one , two , and three loop integrals . some of the integrals are known analytically , and we use them to verify our numerical programs . we also present new loop integrals , which would be extremely tedious to calculate with traditional methods . in this section we present results for one , two , and three - loop integrals that we obtain with our method . for each integral , we present the coefficients of its expansion in @xmath142 through the finite term : @xmath143 where @xmath116 is the depth of the leading pole in @xmath1 . we estimate the errors associated with our results for @xmath144 , by adding , in quadrature , the integration errors of all contributions from the residue decomposition . the first integral we consider is the massless one - loop hexagon , depicted in figure [ fig : hexagon ] . for massless external legs , we derive an eight - dimensional mellin - barnes representation for this integral . due to the high dimensionality , the analytic continuation in @xmath1 involves the crossing of the contours of integration from many poles , and the mellin - barnes expression after the continuation consists of about two hundred terms . this example demonstrates the advantage of the automatic algorithm we described in section [ sec : analytic ] , since the book - keeping is done automatically and our routines perform the @xmath1 expansion in fractions of a minute . after the analytic continuation and the expansion in series of @xmath1 , only integrals with low dimensionality contribute to the poles and finite pieces of the series . the integration over feynman parameters produces a denominator factor @xmath145 , which contributes factors of @xmath1 in the series expansion . the eight - dimensional component , in which no residues have been taken , drops out from the finite part . in addition , most of the residues in the analytic continuation do not give rise to poles in @xmath1 ; a few components only develop a singularity that compensates the @xmath1 in the overall factor . for the scalar hexagon , we find integrals with up to three dimensions which contribute to the poles and the finite term . this mechanism , which reduces the dimensionality of the representation in the leading coefficients of the @xmath1 expansion , is not specific to the hexagon topology , but is typical of mellin - barnes representations of scalar multi - leg integrals . in table [ tb : hex - scalar.physical ] we present explicit results for the scalar hexagon in phase space points corresponding to the physical region for the @xmath146 process . to check the efficiency of our integration routines in all the phase - space , we have sampled hundreds of points . here , we only show representative results in the phase - space points of table [ tb : hexagon - phasepoints ] . these points were generated starting from explicit values for the momenta in four dimensions , so they have a vanishing gram determinant . .explicit values of the invariants for some of the phase space points used for the evaluation of the hexagon topology . the points correspond to the physical region of the @xmath146 scattering of massless particles . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] we also present our results in the kinematical region corresponding to the process @xmath147 shown in figure [ fig:2b2mass ] , relevant , for instance , for the process @xmath148 . in figure [ fig:2off2bem ] we plot the values of the coefficients , for this configuration , up to the finite terms as a function of @xmath49 in the case of two equal masses , @xmath149 , where the energy scale is fixed by @xmath150 . figure [ fig:2off2bm10 ] corresponds to the same kinematical region but for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152 . the error bars again lie within the points in the plot and are , for the finite pieces , typically less that 1% after a run of a couple of minutes per point on a 2.8ghz cpu . process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath149.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath149.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath149.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath149.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath149.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath149.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath149.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath149.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath149.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath149.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152.,width=226 ] process where the two particles in the final state are massive . we plot the values of the coefficients as function of @xmath49 for @xmath150 , @xmath151 and @xmath152.,width=226 ] at the three loop level , we start by considering the on - shell triple box ( figure [ fig:3bonshell ] ) , impressively computed in an analytic way in @xcite using the mb technique . using the re - insertion method described in section ii , we get a 7-fold mb representation . the analytic continuation leaves us with contributions with up to 5 contour integrals for the constant pieces in the @xmath1 expansion , and poles up to @xmath153 . although the numerical integration is certainly more involved in this case , due to the depth of the poles in @xmath1 which generates very complicated expressions for the finite terms , it is relatively easy to achieve a precision of @xmath154 , as shown in figure [ fig : on3bem ] . as in the two loop case we show results for the physical region corresponding to @xmath155 , @xmath156 with @xmath157 and @xmath158 . we compare our results with the analytic computation of @xcite . we used the mathematica package hpl @xcite for the evaluation of the one - dimensional harmonic polylogarithms . process . on the upper and lower left panel we plot the real and imaginary parts , respectively , of @xmath159 as a function of @xmath49 for fixed value of @xmath150 . on the right panels we show the corresponding ratios of the numerical calculation to the analytic result of @xcite for the same kinematics , the bands are given by the error in the numerical integrations.,width=302 ] process . on the upper and lower left panel we plot the real and imaginary parts , respectively , of @xmath159 as a function of @xmath49 for fixed value of @xmath150 . on the right panels we show the corresponding ratios of the numerical calculation to the analytic result of @xcite for the same kinematics , the bands are given by the error in the numerical integrations.,width=302 ] process . on the upper and lower left panel we plot the real and imaginary parts , respectively , of @xmath159 as a function of @xmath49 for fixed value of @xmath150 . on the right panels we show the corresponding ratios of the numerical calculation to the analytic result of @xcite for the same kinematics , the bands are given by the error in the numerical integrations.,width=302 ] process . on the upper and lower left panel we plot the real and imaginary parts , respectively , of @xmath159 as a function of @xmath49 for fixed value of @xmath150 . on the right panels we show the corresponding ratios of the numerical calculation to the analytic result of @xcite for the same kinematics , the bands are given by the error in the numerical integrations.,width=302 ] as we did for the double box topology , we consider now a further step in complication for the triple box , adding a mass in the external state . this is , as far as we know , the first evaluation of a three - loop box with three mass scales . we obtained a mb representation with 8 variables . as usual , the dimensionality of the problem is reduced after the analytic continuation and we found that , up to order @xmath160 , only up to six - fold integrals contribute . we present results for this novel integral in the physical region of the decay of a heavy particle , @xmath161 ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) as we did in the two loops case . in figure [ fig:1off3bm ] we show the the corresponding coefficients of the expansion in @xmath1 as a function of the invariant @xmath162 for fixed values of the other two variables : @xmath163 and @xmath164 . with the notable exception of the left - most point in the real part of the constant term , the error bars are all contained in the plotted points . they are typically of the order of @xmath165 or better for the finite parts after 50 minutes , in average , per point on a 2.8ghz cpu . , width=151 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] ( figure [ fig:3bdecay ] ) . we show the results for fixed values of @xmath163 and @xmath164 as a function of the remaining invariant @xmath162.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] process with the massive leg on the final state . we plot the real and imaginary parts as a function of the invariant @xmath158 for fixed value of @xmath166 and @xmath167.,width=226 ] in this paper , we have introduced a new method for the numerical evaluation of arbitrary loop integrals . we first derive mellin - barnes representations by either decomposing directly the feynman representation , or by using one - loop representations as building blocks for representations of multi - loop integrals . for a given representation , we find values of the space - time dimension and the powers of the propagators which yield a well defined representation . then we use automated programs to perform the analytic continuation to values of the parameters for which the integral may develop divergences . finally , we expand in @xmath1 and compute the integral coefficients of the expansion numerically . the method is based on the earlier work of smirnov @xcite and tausk @xcite . the novel features in our publication are : ( i ) the automation of the procedure for the @xmath1 expansion , ( ii ) the numerical evaluation of the coefficients of the expansion , avoiding cumbersome summations of multiple infinite series and the analytic continuation in the arguments of polylogarithms , ( iii ) and the efficient generalization of the method to tensor integrals . we believe that these new features render our method suitable for the practical evaluation of multi - loop amplitudes in gauge theories . we have performed a number of explicit calculations to verify our algorithms and demonstrate the power of our method . we first recalculated complicated loop integrals which are only recently known in the literature . namely , we evaluated the planar and cross on - shell double boxes , the planar double - box with one leg off - shell , and the triple planar box with on - shell legs . in all cases , we have found an excellent agreement between our numerical results and the known analytic results . the analytic results require complicated analytic continuations of polylogarithms to non - euclidean kinematic regions . with our method , we were able to compute the integrals in all kinematic regions effortlessly . in this paper , we have presented results for loop - integrals which were previously unknown . at two - loops , we have computed the double - box integral with two adjacent legs off - shell for independent external mass - parameters . this is one of the most complicated two - loop box integrals that enters the evaluation of two - loop amplitudes for heavy boson pair production at colliders . at three - loops , we have computed the planar triple - box with one off - shell leg ; this integral emerges in @xmath168 , or the production of a single heavy boson in association with a jet at hadron colliders at nnnlo in qcd . to the best of our knowledge , it is the first time that a two - loop box with four kinematic scales or a three - loop box with three scales are ever computed in all physical regions . many processes with six external legs are particularly important at the lhc . at present , there has been no nlo calculation of a cross - section for a hadron collider process with six external states , due to the lack of efficient methods for evaluating loop amplitudes . in this paper , we applied our method to the evaluation of tensors through rank six for the hexagon topology . the purpose of this application was two - fold ; first , we wanted to demonstrate that we were able to extend the method to tensor integrals economically , and second , to setup programs that are efficient for the evaluation of multi - scale one - loop amplitudes ( e.g. six parton qcd amplitudes ) . we have found that the evaluation of the tensor integrals is not significantly more complicated than the scalar integral . the programs that we developed can be immediately used for the evaluation of the six parton one - loop qcd amplitudes . our technical goals for the current study were to build the necessary programs , implement an efficient book - keeping platform , and to examine the scaling of computing intensity in applications with diverse features . we anticipate that our method can be improved and generalized even further , when we consider issues that were only briefly examined in this first study . for example , in preliminary investigations , we have found that it is possible to exploit further the cauchy theorem . if we specify a kinematic region , it turns out that some of the numerical integrals can be approximated very accurately by the sum of a finite number of residues . we expect that we can improve substantially our efficiency if we replace some of the integrations which involve kinematic scales with appropriate finite sums of such residues . in addition , we are investigating hybrid approaches , combining our method with ideas in ref . @xcite . the applications of our method are numerous . we believe that it will be particularly useful for precision calculations of observables in collider physics . we plan to apply our techniques to key nlo and nnlo calculations for the lhc and to answer more formal questions on the perturbative behavior of gauge theories in the near future . we are indebted to vladimir smirnov , bas tausk , simon schwarz and jeppe andersen for extensive discussions on the topic . we would like to thank aude gehrmann - de ridder , thomas gehrmann , gudrun heinrich , zoltan kunszt , zoltan nagy , and bas tausk for their suggestions and for reading the manuscript . we are grateful to thomas gehrmann for providing us results and numerical routines from refs . @xcite , and daniel matre for discussions about his program to evaluate harmonic polylogarithms @xcite . this work was supported in part by the swiss national science foundation ( snf ) under contract number 200020 - 109162 and by the forschungskredit der universitt zrich . j. campbell , r. k. ellis , f. maltoni and s. willenbrock , arxiv : hep - ph/0510362 . l. w. garland , t. gehrmann , e. w. n. glover , a. koukoutsakis and e. remiddi , nucl . b * 642 * , 227 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0206067 ] . g. passarino and m. j. g. veltman , nucl . b * 160 * , 151 ( 1979 ) . f. v. tkachov , phys . b * 100 * , 65 ( 1981 ) ; k. g. chetyrkin and f. v. tkachov , nucl . b * 192 * , 159 ( 1981 ) . t. gehrmann and e. remiddi , nucl . b * 580 * , 485 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9912329 ] . z. bern , l. j. dixon and d. a. kosower , nucl . b * 412 * , 751 ( 1994 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9306240 ] . a. v. kotikov , phys . b * 254 * , 158 ( 1991 ) . w. t. giele and e. w. n. glover , jhep * 0404 * , 029 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0402152 ] ; r. k. ellis , w. t. giele and g. zanderighi , arxiv : hep - ph/0508308 ; r. k. ellis , w. t. giele and g. zanderighi , phys . d * 72 * , 054018 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0506196 ] . a. denner and s. dittmaier , arxiv : hep - ph/0509141 ; a. denner and s. dittmaier , nucl . b * 658 * , 175 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0212259 ] ; t. binoth , j. p. guillet , g. heinrich , e. pilon and c. schubert , arxiv : hep - ph/0504267 ; t. binoth , g. heinrich and n. kauer , nucl . phys . b * 654 * , 277 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0210023 ] ; t. binoth , j. p. guillet , g. heinrich and c. schubert , nucl . b * 615 * , 385 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0106243 ] ; t. binoth , j. p. guillet and g. heinrich , nucl . b * 572 * , 361 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9911342 ] . a. van hameren , j. vollinga and s. weinzierl , eur . j. c * 41 * , 361 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0502165 ] . f. del aguila and r. pittau , jhep * 0407 * , 017 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0404120 ] . a. denner , s. dittmaier , m. roth and l. h. wieders , arxiv : hep - ph/0505042 ; a. denner , s. dittmaier , m. roth and l. h. wieders , phys . b * 612 * , 223 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0502063 ] . z. nagy and d. e. soper , jhep * 0309 * , 055 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0308127 ] . z. bern , l. j. dixon and d. a. kosower , arxiv : hep - ph/0507005 . s. laporta , int . j. mod . a * 15 * , 5087 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0102033 ] . c. anastasiou and a. lazopoulos , jhep * 0407 * , 046 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0404258 ] . a. v. smirnov and v. a. smirnov , arxiv : hep - lat/0509187 ; o. v. tarasov , nucl . instrum . a * 534 * , 293 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0403253 ] ; o. v. tarasov , acta phys . b * 29 * , 2655 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9812250 ] ; p. a. baikov , arxiv : hep - ph/0507053 ; p. a. baikov , nucl . phys . proc . * 116 * ( 2003 ) 378 . v. a. smirnov and m. steinhauser , nucl . b * 672 * , 199 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0307088 ] . s. actis , a. ferroglia , g. passarino , m. passera and s. uccirati , nucl . b * 703 * , 3 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0402132 ] ; a. ferroglia , m. passera , g. passarino and s. uccirati , nucl . b * 680 * , 199 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0311186 ] ; a. ferroglia , m. passera , g. passarino and s. uccirati , nucl . b * 650 * , 162 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0209219 ] ; g. passarino and s. uccirati , nucl . b * 629 * , 97 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0112004 ] . s. p. martin and d. g. robertson , arxiv : hep - ph/0501132 . m. caffo , h. czyz and e. remiddi , nucl . suppl . * 116 * , 422 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0211178 ] ; s. laporta , phys . b * 504 * , 188 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0102032 ] . t. binoth and g. heinrich , nucl . b * 585 * , 741 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0004013 ] ; t. binoth and g. heinrich , nucl . b * 680 * , 375 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0305234 ] . k. hepp , commun . * 2 * , 301 ( 1966 ) . m. roth and a. denner , `` high - energy approximation of one - loop feynman integrals , '' nucl . b * 479 * , 495 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9605420 ] . t. binoth , g. heinrich and n. kauer , nucl . b * 654 * , 277 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0210023 ] . c. anastasiou , k. melnikov and f. petriello , arxiv : hep - ph/0505069 . v. a. smirnov , phys . b * 460 * , 397 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9905323 ] . j. b. tausk , phys . b * 469 * , 225 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9909506 ] . v. a. smirnov and o. l. veretin , nucl . b * 566 * , 469 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9907385 ] . c. anastasiou , j. b. tausk and m. e. tejeda - yeomans , nucl . suppl . * 89 * , 262 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0005328 ] . v. a. smirnov , phys . b * 491 * , 130 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0007032 ] ; v. a. smirnov , phys . b * 500 * , 330 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0011056 ] ; v. a. smirnov , phys . b * 524 * , 129 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0111160 ] ; g. heinrich and v. a. smirnov , phys . b * 598 * , 55 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0406053 ] . v. a. smirnov , phys . b * 567 * , 193 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0305142 ] . z. bern , l. j. dixon and v. a. smirnov , phys . d * 72 * , 085001 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0505205 ] . c. anastasiou , z. bern , l. j. dixon and d. a. kosower , phys . * 91 * , 251602 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0309040 ] . e. remiddi and j. a. m. vermaseren , int . j. mod . a * 15 * , 725 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9905237 ] . ussyukina , teor.mat.fiz . 22 ( 1975 ) 300 ; e. e. boos and a. i. davydychev , theor . * 89 * , 1052 ( 1991 ) [ teor . mat . fiz . * 89 * , 56 ( 1991 ) ] ; n. i. ussyukina and a. i. davydychev , phys . b * 305 * , 136 ( 1993 ) ; n. i. ussyukina and a. i. davydychev , phys . b * 298 * , 363 ( 1993 ) . t. gehrmann and e. remiddi , nucl . b * 601 * , 248 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0008287 ] . t. gehrmann and e. remiddi , comput . commun . * 141 * , 296 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0107173 ] . t. gehrmann and e. remiddi , comput . phys . commun . * 144 * , 200 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0111255 ] . t. gehrmann and e. remiddi , nucl . b * 640 * , 379 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0207020 ] . Abstract:
[ "we present a new method for the numerical evaluation of arbitrary loop integrals in dimensional regularization . we first derive mellin - barnes integral representations and apply an algorithmic technique , based on the cauchy theorem , to extract the divergent parts in the @xmath0 limit . we then perform an @xmath1-expansion and evaluate the integral coefficients of the expansion numerically . the method yields stable results in physical kinematic regions avoiding intricate analytic continuations . it can also be applied to evaluate both scalar and tensor integrals without employing reduction methods . we demonstrate our method with specific examples of infrared divergent integrals with many kinematic scales , such as two - loop and three - loop box integrals and tensor integrals of rank six for the one - loop hexagon topology ." ]
13,185
13,185
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: it is well known that relativistic quantum field theory models with four - fermion ( 4f ) interactions serve as effective theories for low energy considerations of different real phenomena in a variety of physical branches . for example , the meson spectroscopy , neutron star and heavy - ion collision physics are often investigated in the framework of ( 3 + 1)-dimensional 4f theories @xcite , known as nambu jona - lasinio ( njl ) models @xcite . in particular , low dimensional 4f field theories provide a powerful tool for investigations in condensed - matter physics . indeed , physics of ( quasi)one - dimensional organic peierls insulators ( the best known material of this kind is polyacetylene ) is well described in terms of the ( 1 + 1)-dimensional 4f gross - neveu ( gn ) model @xcite . the quasirelativistic treatment of electrons in planar systems like high - temperature superconductors or in graphene ( a planar monoatomic layer of carbon atoms ) is also possible in terms of ( 2 + 1)-dimensional gn models @xcite . notice that there are physical effects , which were observed for the first time just in the framework of njl- and gn - type models . in particular , the phenomenon of a dynamical generation of a fermion mass is well - known for strong interaction physics since the time , when nambu and jona - lasinio @xcite proved a dynamical breaking of the continuous @xmath2-symmetry on the basis of a generic 4f interaction theory . later on , this effect served as the basis of a qualitatively successful description of the low - energy meson spectrum of quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) @xcite . the effect of dynamical symmetry breaking and generation of a fermion mass is also known in low dimensional , d=1 + 1 and d=2 + 1 , gn theories @xcite , where the four - fermion theory is renormalizable and asymptotic free @xcite in the case of d=1 + 1 , whereas for d=2 + 1 the 4f gn models are perturbatively nonrenormalizable but become renormalizable in the framework of the @xmath3 expansion technique @xcite ( @xmath4 being the number of fermion fields ) . another example of this kind is the effect of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking induced by external magnetic or chromomagnetic fields . this effect was for the first time studied also in terms of the ( 2 + 1)-dimensional gn model @xcite . note in addition that due to a rather simple structure , different low dimensional gn models provide a good laboratory for a deeper study of dense baryon matter and , in particular , for the consideration of such phenomena as ( color)superconductivity @xcite , charged pion condensation @xcite , etc . moreover , these theories are very useful in developing new quantum field theoretical techniques like the @xmath3 expansion @xcite , the optimized perturbation theory @xcite , and so on . it is necessary to point out that there is one more , not yet mentioned above , phenomenon that is still a well - known feature of only some ( 1 + 1)-dimensional 4f theories . this is the duality correspondence between chiral symmetry breaking and superconductivity @xcite . ( in order to avoid the prohibition of cooper pairing as well as spontaneous breaking of a continuous symmetry in ( 1 + 1)-dimensional models @xcite , the consideration should be performed in the leading order of the @xmath3-technique , i.e. in the large-@xmath4 limit assumption . in this case quantum fluctuations , which would otherwise destroy a long - range order corresponding to spontaneous symmetry breaking , are suppressed by @xmath3 factors . ) to formulate this phenomenon , let us imagine that there is a microscopic 4f theory ( for d=1 + 1 see , e.g. , @xcite ) which describes a competition between fermion - antifermion ( or chiral ) and difermion ( or superconducting ) channels of interaction . moreover , we suppose that the ground state of the model is characterized by nonzero fermion number- and chiral charge densities ( the last is an imbalance between densities of left- and right - handed fermions ) , i.e. there are two external parameters , fermion number- @xmath0 and chiral charge- @xmath1 chemical potentials , respectively . then the duality phenomenon means that the phase structure of this 4f model is symmetric with respect to the following simultaneous transformations @xmath5 , @xmath6 and chiral symmetry breaking @xmath7 superconductivity ( here @xmath8 and @xmath9 are the coupling constants in the chiral and superconducting channels , respectively ) . thus , there is a correspondence between properties ( phase structure ) of the model , e.g. , at @xmath10 and @xmath11 , etc . moreover , knowing condensates and other dynamical and thermodynamical quantities of the system , e.g. in the chirally broken phase , one can obtain the corresponding quantities in the superconducting phase of the model , by simply performing there the duality transformation . it is worth to note that in recent years properties of media with nonzero chiral chemical potential @xmath1 , i.e. chiral media , attracted considerable interest ( see , e.g. , @xcite and references therein ) . in nature , chiral media might be realized in heavy - ion collisions , compact stars , condensed matter systems , etc . @xcite ( see also the review @xcite ) . in particular , one can expect that in the quark - gluon - plasma phase of qcd a chirality imbalance is produced , i.e. there appears a nonzero chiral charge density @xmath12 . the combined effect of the chiral imbalance and of the very strong magnetic field , which can be produced at noncentral heavy ion collision , results in the so - called chiral magnetic effect ( see , e.g. , the paper @xcite ) . it means that there might be induced an electric current along the direction of the magnetic field . it is important to note that this phenomenon is described effectively in the framework of 4f models with a chiral chemical potential @xmath1 , i.e. in terms of a quantity conjugated to the chiral charge density @xmath12 . recently , it was established that in planar condensed matter systems there may exists a phenomenon , which can be regarded as an analogue of the qcd chiral magnetic effect @xcite . this is the pseudo chiral magnetic effect , which can be observed , e.g. , in a distorted graphene sheet under the influence of external in - plane magnetic field . indeed , due to a mechanical distortion of the lattice structure of graphene , there might appears a nonzero chiral charge density @xmath12 ( chiral imbalance ) as well as a conserved electric current along the in - plane external magnetic field ( for details , see the paper @xcite ) . notice that , similar to the qcd chiral magnetic effect , one might expect that the pseudo chiral magnetic effect can be effectively described in terms of ( 2 + 1)-dimensional 4f models with nonzero chiral chemical potential @xmath1 ( in addiion to the usual chemical potential @xmath0 ) . finally , it is important to remark that a mechanical distortion of the lattice structure in graphene - like materials ( as well as other external perturbations ) can also lead to opening of different superconducting channels in the system @xcite . thus , it makes sense to study a competition between chiral symmetry breaking and superconductivity in ( 2 + 1)-dimensional quantum field theories with chiral chemical potential @xmath1 . in particular , it is important to predict / observe the possible duality relations between these qualitatively different phenomena accompanied by @xmath1 in field theories in spacetime dimensions d@xmath131 + 1 . in this paper we demonstrate that there exists a dual correspondence ( or dual symmetry ) between the phenomena of the chiral symmetry breaking and superconductivity in the framework of some ( 2 + 1)-dimensional 4f models . the consideration is performed at zero temperature @xmath14 , however it can be easily generalized to the case @xmath15 . we hope that our investigations shed some new light on the physical effects in planar condensed matter systems . the paper is organized as follows . in sec . ii a ( 2 + 1)-dimensional 4f gn - type model , containing both fermion - antifermion ( or chiral ) and difermion ( or superconducting ) interaction channels and including two kinds of chemical potentials , @xmath16 , is presented . here we show that under the pauli - grsey transformations of fermi fields there is a dual relationship between the relevant 4f structures . next , the unrenormalized thermodynamic potential ( tdp ) of the gn - type model is given in the leading order of the large - n expansion . in sec iii the dual symmetry of the model tdp is established . it means that it is invariant under the interchange of coupling constants , @xmath16 chemical potentials and chiral and superconducting condensates . moreover , the renormalization of the tdp is performed . iv contains a detailed numerical investigation of various phase portraits with particular emphasis on the role of the duality symmetry of the tdp . some technical details are relegated to appendices . moreover , in appendix [ apd ] we present an alternative ( 2 + 1)-dimensional gn model with dual relationship between other chiral and superconducting channels of 4f interaction . our investigation is based on a ( 2 + 1)-dimensional gn type model with massless fermions belonging to a fundamental multiplet of the auxiliary @xmath17 flavor group . its lagrangian describes the interaction both in the fermion antifermion and difermion ( or superconducting ) channels : @xmath18\psi_k&+ & \frac { g_1}n\left ( 4f\right ) _ { ch}+\frac { g_2}n\left ( 4f\right ) _ { sc},\label{1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the four - fermion structures @xmath19 and @xmath20 are used , @xmath21 in addition , @xmath0 and @xmath1 in ( 1 ) denote a fermion number chemical potential and a chiral ( axial ) chemical potential , respectively . @xmath0 is conjugated to a fermion number density @xmath22 , whereas @xmath1 is conjugated to a nonzero density of chiral charge @xmath23 , which represents an imbalance in densities of the right- and left - handed fermions . as it is noted above , all fermion fields @xmath24 ( @xmath25 ) form a fundamental multiplet of the @xmath17 group . moreover , each field @xmath24 is a four - component ( reducible ) dirac spinor ( the symbol @xmath14 denotes the transposition operation ) . therefore , in eqs . ( 1)-(2 ) the quantities @xmath26 ( @xmath27 ) and @xmath28 are matrices in the four - dimensional spinor space . moreover , @xmath29 is the charge conjugation matrix . the algebra of these matrices as well as their particular representations are given in appendix [ apa ] . clearly , the lagrangian @xmath30 is invariant under transformations from the internal auxiliary @xmath17 group , which is introduced here in order to make it possible to perform all the calculations in the framework of the nonperturbative large-@xmath4 expansion method . physically more interesting is that the model ( 1 ) is invariant under transformations from the @xmath31 group , where @xmath32 is the fermion number conservation group , @xmath33 ( @xmath34 ) , and @xmath35 is the group of continuous chiral transformations , @xmath36 ( @xmath25 ) . it means that in the framework of the model ( 1 ) both the particle number density @xmath37 and the density of chiral charge @xmath38 are conserved quantities . , which anticommutes with @xmath26 ( @xmath39 ) and @xmath28 , one can consider another continuous chiral @xmath40 transformation group of the spinor fields , @xmath41 ( @xmath25 ) . alternatively , there exists a 4f model with another fermion antifermion and difermion channels of interaction , which , in addition to @xmath32 , is invariant under the continuous chiral @xmath40 group ( see appendix [ apd ] ) . it is worth mentioning that in the case of graphene reducible four - component spinors just describe the two sublattice ( or pseudospin ) and two valley ( or dirac point ) degrees of freedom of the hexagonal honeycomb lattice of carbon atoms ( see e.g. @xcite and references therein ) . ] before studying the thermodynamics of the model , we would like to point out that there is a so - called duality correspondence between chiral and superconducting channels of the model ( 1)-(2 ) . to see this , it is very useful to form an infinite set @xmath42 composed of all lagrangians @xmath43 when the free model parameters @xmath44 and @xmath1 take arbitrary admissible values , i.e. @xmath45 at arbitrary fixed values of coupling constants @xmath46 , @xmath47 and chemical potentials @xmath48 . then , let us perform in ( 1)-(2 ) the so - called pauli - grsey ( pg ) transformation of spinor fields @xcite , @xmath49 taking into account that all spinor fields anticommute with each other , it is easy to see that under the action of the transformations ( [ 0004 ] ) the 4f structures of the lagrangian ( 1 ) are converted into themselves , i.e. @xmath50 and , moreover , each element ( lagrangian ) @xmath43 of the set @xmath51 is transformed into another element of the set @xmath51 according to the following rule @xmath52 i.e. the set @xmath51 is invariant under the field transformations ( [ 0004 ] ) . owing to the relations ( [ 040 ] ) and ( [ 004 ] ) there is a connection between properties of the model at some fixed free model parameters @xmath53 and properties of the model in the case , when @xmath5 and @xmath6 . in particular , if at some fixed @xmath44 and @xmath1 we have the chiral symmetry breaking ( csb ) phase , then at @xmath5 and @xmath6 one can definitely predict the superconducting ( sc ) phase , and vice versa . due to this reason , we will call the relations ( [ 040 ] ) and ( [ 004 ] ) the duality property of the model ( or duality correspondence between csb and sc ) . note also that in appendix [ apd ] we present another ( 2 + 1)-dimensional 4f model , in which the duality correspondence between alternative chiral and superconducting channels is realized . further on , we will study the role and the influence of the duality property of the model ( 1 ) on its phase structure . to this end , we introduce the semi - bosonized version of lagrangian ( [ 1 ] ) that contains only quadratic powers of fermionic fields as well as auxiliary bosonic fields @xmath54 , @xmath55 , @xmath56 and @xmath57 , @xmath58\psi_k -\frac{n(\sigma^2+\pi^2)}{4g_1 } -\frac n{4g_2}\delta^{*}\delta- \frac{\delta^{*}}{2}[\psi_k^tc\psi_k ] -\frac{\delta}{2}[\bar\psi_k c\bar\psi_k^t ] . \label{2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( here and in what follows the summations over repeated indices @xmath25 and @xmath59 are implied . ) clearly , the lagrangians ( 1 ) and ( [ 2 ] ) are equivalent , as can be seen by using the euler - lagrange equations of motion for bosonic fields which take the form @xmath60 one can easily see from ( [ 3 ] ) that the neutral fields @xmath61 and @xmath55 are real quantities , i.e. @xmath62 and @xmath63 ( the superscript symbol @xmath64 denotes the hermitian conjugation ) , but the ( charged ) difermion fields @xmath56 and @xmath65 are hermitian conjugated complex quantities , so that @xmath66 and vice versa . moreover , under the chiral @xmath35 group the fields @xmath67 are singlets , but the fields @xmath68 are transformed in the following way @xmath69 clearly , all the fields ( [ 3 ] ) are also singlets with respect to the auxiliary @xmath17 group , since the representations of this group are real . moreover , with respect to the parity transformation @xmath70 , @xmath71 the fields @xmath61 , @xmath72 and @xmath57 are even quantities , i.e. scalars , but @xmath55 is a pseudoscalar . if the difermion field @xmath56 has a nonzero ground state expectation value , i.e. @xmath73 , then the abelian fermion number conservation @xmath32 symmetry of the model is spontaneously broken down and the superconducting phase is realized in the model . however , if @xmath74 then the continuous @xmath35 chiral symmetry of the model is spontaneously broken . let us now study the phase structure of the four - fermion model ( 1 ) starting from the equivalent semi - bosonized lagrangian ( [ 2 ] ) . in the leading order of the large-@xmath4 approximation , the effective action @xmath75 of the considered model is expressed by means of the path integral over fermion fields : @xmath76[d\psi_l]\exp\bigl(i\int { \cal l}\,d^3 x\bigr),\ ] ] leading to @xmath77 + \widetilde { \cal s}_{\rm { eff}}. \label{5}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the term @xmath78 in ( [ 5 ] ) is the fermion contribution to the effective action and is given by : @xmath79[d\psi_l]\exp\bigl\{i\int\big [ \bar\psi_k(\gamma^\nu i\partial_\nu + \mu\gamma^0+\mu_5\gamma^0\gamma^5 -\sigma - i\gamma^5\pi ) \psi_k - \frac{\delta^{*}}{2}(\psi_k^t c\psi_k ) -\frac{\delta}{2}(\bar\psi_kc \bar\psi_k^t)\big ] d^3 x\bigr\}. \label{6}\ ] ] the ground state expectation values @xmath80 , @xmath81 , etc . of the composite bosonic fields are determined by the saddle point equations , @xmath82 for simplicity , throughout the paper we suppose that the above mentioned ground state expectation values do not depend on spacetime coordinates , i.e. @xmath83 where @xmath84 are constant quantities . in fact , they are coordinates of the global minimum point of the thermodynamic potential ( tdp ) @xmath85 . in the leading order of the large-@xmath4 expansion and using ( 13 ) it is defined by the following expression : @xmath86 the tdp ( [ 08 ] ) is invariant with respect to chiral @xmath35 symmetry group . so , as it is clear from ( [ 003 ] ) , it depends on the quantities @xmath87 and @xmath88 through the combination @xmath89 . moreover , without loss of generality , one can suppose that @xmath90 . thus , to find the other ground state expectation values @xmath80 etc . , it is enough to study the global minimum point of the tdp @xmath91 , @xmath92 taking into account the relations ( [ 5 ] ) , ( [ 6 ] ) and ( [ 08 ] ) , we have from ( [ 09 ] ) @xmath93[d\psi_l]\exp\big ( i\int d^3 x\big [ \bar\psi_k d\psi_k\right.\nonumber\\ & & \left.- \frac{\delta^*}{2}(\psi_k^tc\psi_k ) -\frac{\delta}{2}(\bar\psi_k c\bar\psi_k^t)\big ] \big ) \right ) , \label{9}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath94 . to proceed further , let us point out again that without loss of generality the quantities @xmath95 might be considered as real ones . might be eliminated by an appropriate transformation of fermion fields in the path integral ( [ 9 ] ) . ] so , in what follows we will suppose that @xmath96 , where @xmath97 now is already a real quantity . the path integration in the expression ( [ 9 ] ) is evaluated in appendix [ apb ] , we consider for simplicity the case @xmath98 , however the procedure is easily generalized to the case with @xmath99 . ] so we have for the tdp ( [ 9 ] ) the following expression @xmath100 , \label{11}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath101 are presented in ( [ b12 ] ) and superscription un denotes the unrenormalized quantity . note that the tdp ( [ 11 ] ) describes thermodynamics of the model at zero temperature . taking into account the expressions ( [ b12 ] ) , the tdp ( [ 11 ] ) can be presented in the form @xmath102 where @xmath103 and @xmath104 it is clear from ( [ 013 ] ) that the tdp ( [ 012 ] ) is an even function of each of the quantities @xmath0 , @xmath1 , @xmath87 , and @xmath97 , i.e. without loss of generality we can consider in the following only @xmath105 , @xmath106 , @xmath107 , and @xmath108 values of these quantities . moreover , the tdp ( [ 012 ] ) is invariant with respect to the so - called duality transformation @xcite , @xmath109 notice that this invariance of the tdp is a consequence of the rule ( [ 004 ] ) , according to which the 4f lagrangian ( 1 ) is modified under the pauli - gursey transformation ( [ 0004 ] ) of the spinor field . in powers of @xmath97 the fourth - degree polynomial @xmath110 has the following form @xmath111 expanding the right - hand side of ( [ 17 ] ) in powers of @xmath87 , one can obtain an equivalent alternative expression for this polynomial . namely , @xmath112 note also that according to the general theorem of algebra , the polynomial @xmath110 can be presented in the form @xmath113 where @xmath114 , @xmath115 , @xmath116 and @xmath117 are the roots of this polynomial . the fourth - order polynomial with similar coefficients @xmath118 ( [ 013 ] ) was studied in our paper @xcite , where it was shown that all its roots @xmath119 ( @xmath120 ) are real quantities ( see appendix b in @xcite ) . the roots @xmath119 are the energies of quasiparticle or quasiantiparticle excitations of the system . in particular , it follows from ( [ 17 ] ) that at @xmath121 @xmath122 whereas it is clear from ( [ 18 ] ) that at @xmath123 @xmath124 taking into account in ( [ 012 ] ) the relation ( [ 170 ] ) as well as the formula @xmath125 ( obtained rigorously , e.g. , in appendix b of @xcite and being true up to an infinite term independent of the real quantity @xmath126 ) , it is possible to integrate there over @xmath127 . so the unrenormalized tdp ( [ 012 ] ) can be presented in the following form , @xmath128 first of all , let us obtain a finite , i.e. renormalized , expression for the tdp ( [ 28 ] ) at @xmath130 and @xmath131 , i.e. in vacuum . since in this case a thermodynamic potential is usually called effective potential , we use for it the notation @xmath132 . it follows from ( [ 012 ] ) and ( [ 013 ] ) that at @xmath130 and @xmath131 @xmath132 looks like @xmath133\nonumber\\ & \equiv&\frac{m^2}{4g_1}+\frac{\delta^2}{4g_2}-\int\frac{d^2p}{(2\pi)^2}\big ( \sqrt{|\vec p|^2+(m+\delta)^2}+\sqrt{|\vec p|^2+(m-\delta)^2}\big ) , \label{25}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath134 . ( to obtain the second line of this formula , we have integrated there over @xmath127 according to the relation ( [ int ] ) . ) it is evident that the effective potential ( [ 25 ] ) is an ultraviolet divergent quantity . so , we need to renormalize it . this procedure consists of two steps : ( i ) first of all we need to regularize the divergent integral in ( [ 25 ] ) , i.e. we suppose there that @xmath135 , @xmath136 . ( ii ) second , we must suppose also that the bare coupling constants @xmath8 and @xmath9 depend on the cutoff parameter @xmath137 in such a way that in the limit @xmath138 one obtains a finite expression for the effective potential . before performing the steps ( i ) and ( ii ) of the renormalization procedure , it is useful to take into account the following asymptotic expansion at @xmath139 @xmath140 then , after construction of the regularized effective potential @xmath141 ( see below ) , we use there the asymptotic expansion ( [ 19 ] ) and integrate it over @xmath142 and @xmath143 term - by - term . the result reads @xmath144+\delta^2\left [ \frac 1{4g_2}-\frac{2\lambda\ln(1+\sqrt{2})}{\pi^2}\right ] -\frac{2\lambda^3(\sqrt{2}+\ln(1+\sqrt{2}))}{3\pi^2}+{\cal o}(\lambda^0 ) , \label{12}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath145 denotes an expression which is finite in the limit @xmath146 . now , we should suppose that the bare coupling constants @xmath8 and @xmath9 depend on the cutoff parameter @xmath137 in such a way that in the limit @xmath138 one obtains a finite expressions in the square brackets of ( [ 12 ] ) . clearly , to fulfil this requirement it is sufficient to require that @xmath147 where @xmath148 are finite and @xmath137-independent model parameters with dimensionality of inverse mass . since bare couplings @xmath8 and @xmath9 do not depend on a normalization point , the same property is also valid for @xmath148 . hence , taking into account in ( [ 12 ] ) the relations ( [ 13 ] ) and ignoring there an infinite @xmath87- and @xmath97-independent constant , one obtains the following _ renormalized _ , i.e. finite , expression @xmath149 for the effective potential , @xmath150 it should also be mentioned that the effective potential ( [ 14 ] ) is a renormalization group invariant quantity . the fact that it is possible to renormalize the effective potential of the initial model ( 1 ) in the leading order of the large @xmath4-expansion is the reflection of a more general property of ( 2 + 1)-dimensional theories with four - fermion interactions . indeed , it is well known that in the framework of the naive perturbation theory ( over coupling constants ) these models are not renormalizable . however , as it was proved in @xcite , in the framework of nonperturbative large @xmath4-technique these models are renormalizable in each order of the @xmath3-expansion . the @xmath145 term in ( [ 12 ] ) can be calculated explicitly , so we have for the renormalized effective potential @xmath149 ( [ 14 ] ) the following expression @xmath151 the global minimum point @xmath152 , where @xmath153 and @xmath154 , of this function was already investigated in @xcite , although in the framework of another ( 2 + 1)-dimensional gn model . so , we present at once the phase structure of the initial model ( 1 ) at @xmath130 and @xmath131 ( see fig . 1 ) . in fig . 1 the phase portrait of the model is depicted depending on the values of the free model parameters @xmath155 and @xmath156 . there the plane @xmath157 is divided into several areas . in each area one of the phases i , ii or iii is implemented . in the phase i , i.e. at @xmath158 and @xmath159 , the global minimum of the effective potential @xmath160 is arranged at the origin . so in this case we have @xmath161 and @xmath162 . as a result , in the phase i both continuous symmetries , chiral @xmath35 and electromagnetic @xmath32 , remain intact and fermions are massless . due to this reason the phase i is called symmetric . in the phase ii , which is allowed only for @xmath163 , at the global minimum point the relations @xmath164 and @xmath162 are valid . so in this phase chiral @xmath35 symmetry is spontaneously broken down and fermions acquire dynamically the mass @xmath165 . finally , in the superconducting phase iii , where @xmath166 , we have spontaneous breaking of the @xmath32 symmetry . this phase corresponds to the following values of the gaps : @xmath161 , @xmath167 . note also that if @xmath168 and , in addition , @xmath169 ( it is just the line _ l _ in fig . 1 ) , then the effective potential ( [ 15 ] ) has two equivalent global minima . the first one , the point @xmath170 , corresponds to a phase with chiral symmetry breaking . the second one , i.e. the point @xmath171 , corresponds to superconductivity . clearly , if the cutoff parameter @xmath137 is fixed , then the phase structure of the model can be described in terms of bare coupling constants @xmath172 instead of finite quantities @xmath173 . indeed , let us first introduce a critical value of the couplings , @xmath174 . then , as it follows from fig . 1 and ( [ 13 ] ) , at @xmath175 and @xmath176 the symmetric phase i of the model is located . if @xmath177 , @xmath176 ( @xmath175 , @xmath178 ) , then the chiral symmetry broken phase ii ( the superconducting phase iii ) is realized . finally , let us suppose that both @xmath177 and @xmath178 . in this case at @xmath11 ( @xmath10 ) we have again the chiral symmetry broken phase ii ( the superconducting phase iii ) . now , few comments about the nature of the superconductivity ( sc ) and chiral symmetry breaking ( csb ) are in order . in the framework of the model ( 1 ) there are two well - known mechanisms for appearing of these phenomena , ( i ) dynamical symmetry breaking , which occurs at strong couplings , and ( ii ) cooper instability of fermi surface , which takes place , in contrast to the case ( i ) , at weak couplings . if @xmath130 and @xmath131 , then the initial model ( 1 ) describes effectively the undoped regime of high temperature cuprate superconductors , etc ( see , e.g. , the papers @xcite , where the phase structure , similar to the phase diagram of our fig . 1 , was obtained ) . in this case fermi surface is absent , so both csb and sc phases appear dynamically in the system at a _ rather strong attraction _ in the fermion - antifermion or difermion channels , i.e. at @xmath177 and @xmath11 or at @xmath178 and @xmath179 , respectively . hence , at zero values of chemical potentials only the mechanism ( i ) for generating both sc and csb is realized in our model . is well known since the papers by nambu and jona - lasinio [ 3 ] . it is also valid in the framework of other ( 3 + 1)-dimensional 4f models with chiral and color superconducting channels of interaction at @xmath130 @xcite . in @xcite the bare coupling constants @xmath8 and @xmath9 are free model parameters . moreover , strong constraints were obtained there on @xmath8 and @xmath9 , at which color sc or csb is generated dynamically in the models . ] the second way , i.e. the mechanism ( ii ) , to break spontaneously a symmetry can be realized only at nonzero chemical potentials . for example , if the doping or impurities are present in the system , then one must introduce a finite chemical potential @xmath0 . in this case the fermi surface can be created . as a result , if there is an _ arbitrary small attraction _ in the sc channel , i.e. even at @xmath176 , there appears the so - called cooper instability of the fermi surface , which destroys the normal ground state in favor of superconductivity . ( below , when discussing the phase portrait of fig . 5 ( see sect [ ivb ] ) , we will see that at @xmath131 and @xmath180 both ( i ) and ( ii ) mechanisms take part in forming the phase structure . ) if @xmath130 but @xmath181 , then csb can also be generated in the model due to the mechanism ( ii ) at arbitrary small values of @xmath8 ( see in @xcite ) . this fact supports the duality correspondence between sc and csb in the model ( 1 ) . + to renormalize the tdp ( [ 28 ] ) in the most general case , it is necessary to imagine how the integrand of ( [ 28 ] ) , i.e. the quantity @xmath182 , behaves at asymptotically high values of @xmath183 . the properties of the roots @xmath119 ( @xmath120 ) of the polynomial @xmath110 appearing in ( [ 012 ] ) can be obtained both numerically and analytically using the methods of appendix b of @xcite . so it is easy to show that at @xmath139 @xmath184 since the asymptotic expansions ( [ 016 ] ) and ( [ 19 ] ) coincide , one can subtract from the integrand of ( [ 28 ] ) the expression @xmath185 , thereby obtaining a convergent integral . taking into account this circumstance , we have identically @xmath186 where @xmath187 is the effective potential ( [ 25 ] ) of the model in vacuum , i.e. at @xmath130 and @xmath131 , and @xmath188.\label{018}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is clear that the term @xmath189 in ( [ 017 ] ) is a convergent integral and all ultraviolet divergences of the tdp ( [ 28])-([017 ] ) are located in the term @xmath187 . hence , we can renormalize only the first term of ( [ 017 ] ) in the way of the previous subsection and obtain finally : @xmath190 where @xmath149 and @xmath189 are presented in ( [ 15 ] ) and ( [ 018 ] ) , correspondingly . it was already mentioned above that using the method presented in appendix b of the paper @xcite , the roots @xmath119 can be calculated numerically ( at fixed values of @xmath191 , etc ) . as a result , it is also possible to study numerically the whole tdp ( [ 20 ] ) . carrying out this procedure , we have seen that the global minimum of the tdp @xmath192 is always at the point of the form @xmath193 or @xmath194 . so , to get a more detailed information about the phase structure of the model , it is sufficient to investigate the reductions of the tdp ( [ 20 ] ) on the @xmath87- and @xmath97 axes on the @xmath87- and @xmath97 axes is known ( see ( [ 26 ] ) and ( [ 27 ] ) ) . ] , i.e. to consider the functions @xmath195\nonumber\\ & = & v_1(m)-\int\frac{d^2p}{(2\pi)^2 } \sum_{\eta = \pm}\big [ { \cal e}_{\eta}-\sqrt{|\vec p|^2+m^2}+(\mu-{\cal e}_{\eta})\theta(\mu-{\cal e}_{\eta})\big ] , \label{31}\\ f_2(\delta)&\equiv&\omega^{ren}(m=0,\delta)= v_2(\delta)-\int\frac{d^2p}{(2\pi)^2 } \sum_{\eta = \pm}\big [ \sqrt{\delta^2+(|\vec p|+\eta\mu)^2}-\sqrt{|\vec p|^2+m^2}\nonumber\\&+&\left ( \mu_5-\sqrt{\delta^2+(|\vec p|+\eta\mu)^2}\right ) \theta\left ( \mu_5-\sqrt{\delta^2+(|\vec p|+\eta\mu)^2}\right ) \big ] , \label{32}\end{aligned}\ ] ] respectively , where @xmath196 and @xmath197 is the reduction of the vacuum effective potential ( [ 15 ] ) on the @xmath87 ( in this case @xmath198 , @xmath199 ) or @xmath97 ( in this case @xmath200 , @xmath201 ) axes . moreover , to obtain the second line in ( [ 31 ] ) we use the evident relations , @xmath202 and @xmath203 . after tedious but straightforward calculations , the tdp ( [ 31 ] ) can be presented in the following form ( see appendix [ apc ] ) : @xmath204\nonumber\\ & & -\frac{\theta\left ( \sqrt{m^2+\mu_5 ^ 2}-\mu\right ) } { 2\pi}\left [ \mu_5 ^ 2\sqrt{\mu_5 ^ 2+m^2}+\mu_5 m^2\ln\left ( \frac{\mu_5+\sqrt{\mu_5 ^ 2+m^2}}{m}\right ) \right ] \nonumber\\ & & -\frac{\theta\left ( \mu - m\right ) \theta\left ( \sqrt{m^2+\mu_5 ^ 2}-\mu\right ) } { 2\pi}\left [ \mu_5\mu\sqrt{\mu^2-m^2}-\mu_5 m^2\ln\left ( \frac{\mu+\sqrt{\mu^2-m^2}}{m}\right ) \right ] \label{c18}\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( at @xmath131 this expression coincides with the corresponding tdp ( 22 ) from the paper @xcite ) . moreover , comparing the expressions ( [ 31 ] ) and ( [ 32 ] ) , we see that the quantity @xmath205 can be easily obtained from the tdp @xmath206 by the substitutions @xmath207 , @xmath208 and @xmath6 , i.e. @xmath209 clearly , the connection ( [ 35 ] ) between the reductions of the tdp @xmath192 on the @xmath87- and @xmath97 axes is the consequence of the duality property ( [ 16 ] ) of the model . next , in order to find the phase structure of the model , we will determine the global minimum points of the tdps @xmath210 ( [ c18 ] ) and @xmath211 ( [ 35 ] ) and then compare the minimum values of these functions vs external parameters @xmath212 . suppose now that at some fixed particular values of the model parameters , i.e. at @xmath213 , @xmath214 and @xmath215 , @xmath216 , the global minimum of the tdp ( [ 20 ] ) lies at the point , e.g. , @xmath217 . it means that for such fixed values of the parameters the chiral symmetry breaking ( csb ) phase is realized . then it follows from the duality invariance of the unrenormalized tdp with respect to the transformation @xmath218 ( [ 16 ] ) that the permutation of the coupling constant and chemical potential values for the renormalized tdp ( [ 20 ] ) means @xmath219 , @xmath220 , @xmath221 , under which this tdp is invariant . ] ( i.e. at @xmath222 , @xmath223 and @xmath224 , @xmath225 ) moves the global minimum of the tdp @xmath226 to the point @xmath227 , and the superconducting ( sc ) phase is originated ( and vice versa ) . this is the so - called duality correspondence between csb and sc phases in the framework of the model under consideration . hence , the knowledge of a phase of the model ( 1 ) at some fixed values of external free model parameters @xmath228 is sufficient to understand what phase is realized at rearranged values of external parameters , @xmath229 . moreover , we would like to emphasize once again that there exists an equality of the order parameters ( condensates ) , which characterizes both the initial phase and the phase corresponding to rearranged external parameters . in other words the chiral condensate of the csb phase at fixed @xmath228 is equal to the sc condensate of the phase at @xmath229 ( and vice versa ) . the duality transformation ( [ 16 ] ) of the tdp can also be applied to the arbitrary phase portrait of the model ( see below ) . in particular , it is clear that if we have a most general phase portrait , i.e. the correspondence between any point @xmath230 of the four - dimensional space of external parameters and possible model phases ( csb , sc and symmetric phase ) , then under the duality transformation ( @xmath231 , @xmath6 , csb@xmath7sc ) this phase portrait is mapped to itself , i.e. the most general phase portrait is selfdual . in practice , usually , there are constraints on the model parameters . as a result , if the constraint is dually ( non)invariant , then the phase portrait is also a dually ( non)invariant . below , we will use the dual symmetry of the tdp in order to explain and construct the phase structure of the model in different particular cases . + first of all , taking into account the duality correspondence between csb and sc , let us determine its characteristic features and then find ( analytically and numerically ) the phase structure of the model ( 1 ) in two particular cases , ( i ) @xmath232 and ( ii ) @xmath233 . it is evident that both of these constraints , ( i ) and ( ii ) , are invariant with respect to the duality transformation @xmath231 , @xmath6 . hence , the corresponding phase portraits should be selfdual ( a more detailed explanation of this fact is presented in the next subsection ) . in the case ( i ) we want to study the @xmath157 phase portrait , whereas in the case ( ii ) the @xmath234 phase portrait . it follows from the duality correspondence that in the case ( i ) the region of the csb phase is a mirror image of the sc phase with respect to the line @xmath233 of the @xmath157 plane . however , in the case ( ii ) the regions of these phases are arranged mirror symmetrically with respect to the line @xmath232 of the plane @xmath234 . of course , the specific form of the csb and sc areas depends on the values of the external parameters . for example , at @xmath235 the phase structure is presented in fig ( note that in order to obtain this phase portrait it is sufficient to investigate the behavior of the global minimum point of the tdp @xmath149 ( [ 15 ] ) vs the coupling constants @xmath155 and @xmath156 . ) however , at fixed @xmath236 the phase structure is presented in fig . 2 , where one can see the mirror symmetrical arrangement of the phases ii and iii with respect to the line @xmath233 . in figs 3 , 4 the @xmath234-phase portraits of the model ( 1 ) are presented at fixed @xmath237 and fixed @xmath238 , respectively . the csb and sc phases in these figures are arranged , as defined above , symmetrically with respect to the line @xmath232 of the @xmath234 plane . if @xmath239 , then at the points of the boundary of the phase i in fig . 3 , the second order phase transition takes place . in this case it is possible to give exact analytical expressions for the boundaries of the region i in fig . indeed , the global minimum point @xmath165 of the tdp ( [ c18 ] ) is defined by the equation @xmath240 . inside the region ii of fig . 3 we have @xmath241 and @xmath242 . however , on the boundary between phases i and ii one can see that @xmath161 and , moreover , that @xmath243 . it is the last relation that defines the boundary equation between i and ii phases . this equation looks like @xmath244 in a similar way it is possible to find the equation for the boundary between i and iii phases of fig . 3 : @xmath245 in contrast , on the boundary of the phase i of fig . 4 , a phase transition of the first order takes place . since on the boundary between ii and iii phases of this figure we also have a first order phase transitions , it is clear that the point t of the phase portrait fig . 4 is a so - called triple point , i.e. the point where three different phases , i , ii and iii , coexist . the triple point t of fig . 4 corresponds to the chemical potential values @xmath246 . in these two particular cases the restrictions on the external model parameters are already not dually invariant , so the corresponding @xmath157-phase portraits are not selfdual . however , as we shall see , each of these two phase portraits is a dual mapping of another one . the @xmath157-phase structure of the model at arbitrary fixed nonzero value of @xmath0 ( of @xmath1 ) and at @xmath131 ( at @xmath130 ) is presented in fig . 5 ( in fig . 6 ) let us first compare fig . 1 and fig it is easy to see that if @xmath158 , @xmath159 and @xmath235 , then the system is in the symmetric phase i ( see fig . 1 ) . however , an arbitrary small nonzero value of the chemical potential @xmath0 induces ( at @xmath131 ) in this case the superconducting phase iii ( see fig . 5 as well as fig . 3 for the particular case @xmath248 ) . note that there is a very simple explanation of this fact , which is based on the symmetry breaking mechanism ( ii ) ( see the end of the section iii a ) , i.e. on the cooper instability of a fermi surface . indeed , at @xmath158 , @xmath159 and @xmath180 we have a nonzero particle density ( see , e.g. , in @xcite ) , so there is a fermi sea of particles with energies less or equal to @xmath0 ( fermi surface ) . evidently , in this case there is no energy cost for creating a pair of particles with opposite momenta just over the fermi surface . then , due to an arbitrary weak attraction between these particles ( @xmath249 ) , the cooper pair is formed and @xmath32 symmetry is spontaneously broken , as a result of bose einstein condensation of cooper pairs . since in the energy spectrum of fermions the gap @xmath250 appears , rather small external forces are not able to destroy the superconducting condensate and it is a stable one . if @xmath158 , @xmath166 , then we have a rather strong interaction in the sc channel , i.e. @xmath178 and @xmath175 . as a result , in this case both at @xmath130 and @xmath180 the dynamical symmetry breaking mechnism ( i ) ( see the end of the section iii a ) plays a decisive role in the forming of sc phenomenon . now suppose that @xmath251 and @xmath252 , i.e. @xmath177 . ( in particular , the point @xmath157 might belong to the phase ii of fig . 1 , where chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken at @xmath130 , @xmath131 . ) then it follows from fig . 5 that at @xmath131 there is a sufficiently high critical value @xmath253 of the chemical potential @xmath0 , such that at @xmath254 the point @xmath255 will certainly be in one of the regions iii of fig . hence , the growth ( at @xmath131 ) of the chemical potential @xmath0 leads to the appearance of the sc phase in the model ( 1 ) at arbitrary @xmath256 and @xmath252 . , @xmath131 without duality correspondence . ] analysing in the same manner fig . 6 , we see that in the opposite case when @xmath130 but @xmath257 , the growth ( at @xmath130 ) of the chiral chemical potential @xmath1 leads to the appearance of the csb phase in the model ( 1 ) at arbitrary fixed @xmath256 and @xmath252 . indeed , these two properties of the model ( 1 ) , i.e. ( a ) the appearance of the sc at @xmath131 and at growing values of @xmath0 as well as ( b ) the appearance of the csb at @xmath130 and at growing values of @xmath1 ( in these two cases it is supposed that @xmath256 and @xmath252 are fixed ) , are dually connected ( or dually conjugated ) . to understand this fact , it is necessary to emphasize once again that ( a ) follows from the phase portrait of fig . 5 , whereas ( b ) is the consequence of the phase portrait presented in fig . 6 . now we will demonstrate that under the dual transformation @xmath218 ( @xmath231 , @xmath6 , csb@xmath7sc ) the phase portrait of fig . 5 is transformed into the phase portrait of fig . 6 ( and vice versa ) . note that the application of @xmath218 to fig . 5 can be divided into three more simple steps . ( i ) first , under permutation @xmath258 in ( [ 16 ] ) we have renaming of the phases , i.e. ii@xmath7iii . ( for example , in this case the global minimum point of the csb phase , i.e. the point @xmath259 , is transformed into the point @xmath260 and , as a result , the csb phase is transformed into the sc phase . ) ( ii ) second , performing the @xmath6 and @xmath231 transformations in fig . 5 , we rename the coordinate axes of the figure ( after the duality transformation we have along the vertical axis the quantity @xmath261 and along the horizontal one the quantity @xmath262 ) and change its caption or external conditions , at which the phase portrait is obtained . ( in our case the caption * @xmath131 with @xmath0 being an arbitrary fixed quantity * for fig . 5 is replaced by * @xmath130 with @xmath1 being an arbitrary fixed quantity * , i.e. we obtain the caption for fig . ( iii ) finally , it is necessary to direct the axis corresponding to the quantity @xmath261 ( to the quantity @xmath262 ) horizontally ( vertically ) . as a result of this dual transformation of the fig . 5 we obtain just fig . 6 . + in a similar way it is possible to apply the duality transformation @xmath218 to each of the phase portraits presented in figs . 14 . as a result , we see that these phase structures are selfdual . in the next subsubsections we obtain the phase structure of the model in other more general nonselfdual cases , i.e. the @xmath157-phase portraits at arbitrary fixed values of chemical potentials and the @xmath234-phase portraits at arbitrary fixed values of the coupling constants . -phase portrait of the model at arbitrary fixed values of @xmath0 and for different values of the chiral chemical potential @xmath1 . ( a ) the case @xmath263 . ( b ) the case @xmath264 . ( c ) the case @xmath265 . ( d ) the case @xmath266 . we use the same designations of the phases as in fig . 1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] -phase portrait of the model at arbitrary fixed values of @xmath0 and for different values of the chiral chemical potential @xmath1 . ( a ) the case @xmath263 . ( b ) the case @xmath264 . ( c ) the case @xmath265 . ( d ) the case @xmath266 . we use the same designations of the phases as in fig . 1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] + -phase portrait of the model at arbitrary fixed values of @xmath0 and for different values of the chiral chemical potential @xmath1 . ( a ) the case @xmath263 . ( b ) the case @xmath264 . ( c ) the case @xmath265 . ( d ) the case @xmath266 . we use the same designations of the phases as in fig . 1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] -phase portrait of the model at arbitrary fixed values of @xmath0 and for different values of the chiral chemical potential @xmath1 . ( a ) the case @xmath263 . ( b ) the case @xmath264 . ( c ) the case @xmath265 . ( d ) the case @xmath266 . we use the same designations of the phases as in fig . 1 . , title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] + let us now fix the fermion number chemical potential @xmath247 and consider how the @xmath157-phase portrait of the model is evolved vs the chiral chemical potential @xmath1 . this phase portrait at @xmath131 is presented in fig . 5 . in figs . 7 we have drawn several @xmath157-phase portraits at different relations between @xmath1 and @xmath0 , ( a ) @xmath263 , ( b ) @xmath264 , ( c ) @xmath265 , ( d ) @xmath266 . analyzing figs . 5 and 7 , we see the following phase evolution of the system vs @xmath1 at fixed @xmath247 . at @xmath131 the sc phase iii fills almost the whole @xmath255 plane ( see fig . it means that at arbitrary fixed @xmath256 and @xmath252 we have superconductivity in the system at sufficiently high values of @xmath0 ( see section [ ivb ] ) . if @xmath1 begins to grow , then for a lot of @xmath157 points there might occur a restoration of the initial symmetry ( the symmetrical phase i arises ) in the model however , the further growth of @xmath1 leads to the final appearance of the csb phase . it is the general property of the chiral chemical potential @xmath1 , which promotes the chiral symmetry breaking in the system . since the above mentioned constraints ( a), .. ,(d ) at which figs . 7 were drawn are not invariant under the duality transformation @xmath267 ( [ 16 ] ) , we would like to note that the phase portraits of fig . 7 are not selfdual . in this case the possible duality transformation ( see the previous subsubsection [ ivb ] ) of figs . 7 might result in the set of four phase portraits , which are a good illustration of the evolution of the model phase structure vs the particle number chemical potential @xmath0 at arbitrary fixed @xmath181 . it is straightforwardly clear from the dual mapping of figs . 7 that at arbitrary fixed values of @xmath257 and @xmath256 , @xmath252 we have in the system the appearance of superconductivity at sufficiently high @xmath0 . this property is dually conjugated to the appearing of csb phase at sufficiently high values of @xmath1 , which is a consequence of the phase portraits fig . 7 ( see the above consideration ) . we have already considered the @xmath234-phase structure of the model in the case of dually symmetrical constraints on the coupling constants , i.e. when @xmath233 ( see figs . 3 , 4 ) . in the present section , special attention is paid to a more general case when @xmath268 . here we construct @xmath234-phase portraits of the model for qualitatively different representative relations between @xmath155 and @xmath156 . namely , we fix in each of the regions of fig . 1 some representative @xmath157 point and draw a corresponding @xmath234-phase diagram . ( note that due to a duality symmetry of the model , it is sufficient to reduce the number of the representative @xmath157 points to three . ) in fig . 8 the @xmath234-phase portrait corresponds to arbitrary fixed @xmath158 and @xmath269 ( it is clear that at @xmath235 the point @xmath270 lies in the symmetrical region i of fig . 1 ) . on the phase boundaries of this figure there are phase transitions of the second order . in fig . 9 the @xmath234-phase portrait corresponds to arbitrary fixed @xmath163 and @xmath271 ( in this case at @xmath235 the point @xmath272 lies in the csb region ii of fig . 1 ) . finally , in fig . 10 the @xmath234-phase portrait corresponds to arbitrary fixed @xmath163 and @xmath273 ( in this case at @xmath235 the point @xmath274 lies in the sc region iii of fig . 1 ) . to obtain the @xmath234-phase portraits of the model when the point @xmath157 is fixed in the two remaining areas of fig . 1 , it is enough to perform the dual mapping of the figs 9 and 10 . in figs . 9 , 10 all phase boundaries are the curves of the first order phase transitions , so the point t on these figures is a triple point , where three phases coexist . the main conclusion from figs 8 - 10 is that the growth of @xmath1 ( the growth of @xmath0 ) induces the chiral symmetry breaking ( induces the superconductivity ) . + -phase portrait of the model at arbitrary fixed @xmath163 and @xmath273 . the notations i , ii and iii are the same as in fig . the letter t denotes a triple point , @xmath275 , @xmath276.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=45.0% ] + in this paper , the duality correspondence phenomenon between csb and sc , which was found earlier in ( 1 + 1)-dimensional 4f theories @xcite , is demonstrated to take place also in the framework of the ( 2 + 1)-dimensional 4f model ( 1 ) . ( an alternative 4f model with other dually conjugated chiral and superconducting channels of interaction is considered in appendix [ apd ] ) . it contains both fermion - antifermion ( with @xmath8 a bare coupling constant ) and difermion ( with @xmath9 a bare coupling constant ) interaction channels and two kinds of chemical potentials , @xmath16 . the duality property of the model means that its thermodynamic potential @xmath277 ( [ 11 ] ) is invariant under the duality transformation ( [ 16 ] ) . as a result , we have established the duality correspondence between csb and sc phases of the model ( 1 ) ( as well as of the alternative model of appendix [ apd ] ) . let us suppose , e.g. , that for some fixed set @xmath230 of external parameters ( the coupling constants @xmath155 and @xmath156 are connected with bare couplings @xmath278 by the relation ( [ 13 ] ) ) the chiral symmetry breaking phase is realized in the model . then for rearranged values of external parameters , @xmath231 , @xmath6 , ( or for dually conjugated set @xmath279 ) we have the so - called dually conjugated superconducting phase ( and vice versa ) . moreover , it must be emphasized that the chiral condensate of the csb phase , realized for the set @xmath230 , is equal to the superconducting condensate of the dually conjugated sc phase , corresponding to the set of external parameters with @xmath231 , @xmath6 ( and vice versa ) . in this way , it is sufficient to have the information about the ground state of the initial phase , which is realized for the set @xmath230 , in order to determine the properties of the ground state of the dually conjugated phase , corresponding to the rearranged external parameter set @xmath279 . in order to study the role and influence of the duality property on the phase structure of the model , for comparison and illustrations , we have demonstrated a variety of phase portraits in the ( @xmath16)- and @xmath157 planes . in particular , if the constraint , under which we obtain a phase portrait , is dually invariant , i.e. at @xmath232 or at @xmath233 , then we have a selfdual phase diagram ( see , e.g. , figs 14 ) . the selfdual phase portrait is mapped into itself under the duality transformation ( it is introduced in sec . [ ivb ] ) , and its most characteristic feature is the mirror symmetrical arrangement of the csb and sc phases with respect to the line @xmath232 ( or @xmath233 ) of the phase diagram . we have also presented a series of nonselfdual phase portraits , which do not transform into themselves under the duality mapping ( see figs . the results obtained lead to the conclusion that the growth of the chiral chemical potential @xmath1 promotes the chiral symmetry breaking , were studied , correspondingly , in the recent papers @xcite and @xcite . it was shown there that the chiral chemical potential @xmath1 plays a role of the catalyst of dynamical chiral symmetry breaking . ] whereas particle number chemical potential @xmath0 induces superconductivity in the system ( see also in @xcite ) . we hope that our investigations may shed some new light on physical effects in planar systems like high - temperature superconductors or graphene . the two - dimensional irreducible representation of the ( 2 + 1)-dimensional lorentz group so(2,1 ) is realized by the following @xmath281 @xmath282-matrices : @xmath283 acting on two - component dirac spinors . they have the properties : @xmath284=-2i\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha } \tilde\gamma_{\alpha};~ ~\tilde\gamma^{\mu}\tilde\gamma^{\nu}=-i\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha } \tilde\gamma_{\alpha}+g^{\mu\nu } , \label{a2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath285 . there is also the relation : @xmath286 note that the definition of chiral symmetry is slightly unusual in ( 2 + 1)-dimensions ( spin is here a pseudoscalar rather than a ( axial ) vector ) . the formal reason is simply that there exists no other @xmath281 matrix anticommuting with the dirac matrices @xmath287 which would allow the introduction of a @xmath28-matrix in the irreducible representation . the important concept of chiral symmetries and their breakdown by mass terms can nevertheless be realized also in the framework of ( 2 + 1)-dimensional quantum field theories by considering a four - component reducible representation for dirac fields . in this case the dirac spinors @xmath288 have the following form : @xmath289 with @xmath290 being two - component spinors . in the reducible four - dimensional spinor representation one deals with 4@xmath2914 @xmath280-matrices : @xmath292 , where @xmath293 are given in ( [ a1 ] ) . one can easily show , that ( @xmath294 ) : @xmath295 = diag(-i\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha}\tilde\gamma_\alpha , -i\varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha}\tilde\gamma_\alpha ) . \label{a5}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in addition to the dirac matrices @xmath296 there exist two other matrices , @xmath297 and @xmath28 , which anticommute with all @xmath296 and with themselves @xmath298 with @xmath299 being the unit @xmath281 matrix . it is obvious that @xmath300 and @xmath301 . each of the matrices @xmath297 and @xmath28 ( see appendix [ apa ] ) can be selected as a generator for the corresponding @xmath40 and @xmath35 chiral group of spinor field transformations . for example , the lagrangian ( 1 ) is invariant with respect to @xmath35 such that @xmath302 . alternatively , it is possible to construct a 4f model with fermion - antifermion and superconducting channels , symmetric under @xmath40 continuous chiral transformations , @xmath303 ( @xmath34 ) . its lagrangian , e.g. , reads @xmath304\psi_k&+ & \frac { g_1}n\left ( \widetilde { 4f}\right ) _ { ch}+\frac { g_2}n\left ( \widetilde { 4f}\right ) _ { sc},\label{a7}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the four - fermion structures @xmath305 and @xmath306 are used , @xmath307 here @xmath308 and @xmath0 is the usual particle number chemical potential ( as in ( 1 ) ) . since this lagrangian is invariant under @xmath40 , there exist a corresponding conserved density of chiral charge @xmath309 as well as its thermodynamically conjugate quantity , the chiral ( or axial ) chemical potential @xmath310 . note that in the framework of the model ( [ a7 ] ) there is also the duality between chiral and superconducting channels of interaction , i.e. between @xmath311 and @xmath312 four - fermion structures ( [ a71 ] ) . indeed , performing in ( [ a7])-([a71 ] ) the modified pauli - gursey transformation of spinor fields , @xmath313 we see that @xmath314 the relations ( [ d2 ] ) are the basis for the duality invariance of the thermodynamic potential of the model ( [ a7 ] ) . then , the thermodynamic potential @xmath322 , which describes the ground state of the model ( [ a7])-([a8 ] ) , is analogously defined by the following relation ( for convenience , we omit here and below the tilde in fields ) @xmath323[d\psi_l]\exp\big ( i\int d^3 x\big [ \bar\psi_k d_{\gamma^3}\psi_k\right.\nonumber\\ & & \left.- \frac{\delta}{2}(\psi_k^t\widetilde c\psi_k ) -\frac{\delta}{2}(\bar\psi_k\widetilde c\bar\psi_k^t)\big ] \big ) \right ) , \label{90}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath324 . in writing down this expression , we used the same arguments that were used in the derivation of the thermodynamic potential in the framework of the model ( 1 ) ( see the derivation of ( [ 9 ] ) in section ii ) . path integration in the expression ( [ 90 ] ) is evaluated in appendix [ apb ] so we have for the tdp ( [ 90 ] ) the following expression @xmath325 , \label{91}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath326 are presented in ( [ b14 ] ) . comparing this thermodynamic potential with the tdp @xmath327 ( [ 11 ] ) of the model ( 1 ) , we see that @xmath328 as a result , it is clear that the tdp @xmath329 of the 4f model ( [ a7 ] ) is invariant under the following dual transformation @xmath330 furthermore , to find phase portraits of the model ( [ a7 ] ) , it is sufficient to perform in all figs 1, .. ,10 the replacement @xmath331 . let us calculate the following path integral over anticommuting four - component dirac spinor fields @xmath332 , @xmath333 : @xmath334[d\psi ] \exp\big ( i\int d^3 x\big [ \bar\psi d_\gamma\psi-\frac{\delta}{2}(\psi^tc\gamma\psi ) -\frac{\delta}{2}(\bar\psi c\gamma\bar\psi^t)\big ] \big ) , \label{b1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath335 is the charge conjugation matrix , @xmath336 . since in the 4@xmath2914 spinor space the product matrix @xmath337 should be an antisymmetric one , it is clear that the @xmath338 matrix in ( [ b1 ] ) might be , e.g. , the unit matrix @xmath339 in the spinor space or @xmath340 ( for notations see appendix [ apa ] ) , etc . note in addition that at @xmath341 and @xmath342 ( see in ( [ 9 ] ) ) the integral @xmath343 is equal to the argument of the @xmath344-function in the formula ( [ 9 ] ) in the particular case @xmath98 , whereas at @xmath340 and @xmath345 ( see ( [ 90 ] ) ) the integral @xmath343 is equal to the argument of the @xmath344-function in the formula ( [ 90 ] ) also in the particular case @xmath98 . recall , there are general gaussian path integrals @xcite : @xmath346\exp\big ( i\int d^3 x\big [ -\frac{1}{2}\psi^t a \psi + \eta^t\psi \big ] \big ) & = & \left(\det(a)\right ) ^{1/2}\exp\big ( -\frac{i}{2}\int d^3 x\big [ \eta^t a^{-1}\eta\big ] \big ) , \label{b2}\\ \int[d\bar\psi]\exp\big ( i\int d^3 x\big [ -\frac{1}{2}\bar\psi a \bar\psi^t + \bar\eta\bar\psi^t\big ] \big ) & = & \left ( \det(a)\right ) ^{1/2}\exp\big ( -\frac{i}{2}\int d^3 x\big [ \bar\eta a^{-1}\bar\eta^t\big ] \big ) , \label{b3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath347 is an antisymmetric operator in coordinate and spinor spaces , and @xmath348 , @xmath349 are anticommuting spinor sources which also anticommute with @xmath288 and @xmath350 . first , let us integrate in ( [ b1 ] ) over @xmath288-fields with the help of the relation ( [ b2 ] ) supposing there that @xmath351 , @xmath352 , i.e. @xmath353 . then @xmath354\exp\big ( -\frac{i}{2}\int d^3 x \bar\psi \big [ \delta c\gamma+d_\gamma(\delta c\gamma)^{-1}d_\gamma^t\big ] \bar\psi^t\big ) . \label{b4}\end{aligned}\ ] ] second , the integration over @xmath350-fields in ( [ b4 ] ) can be easily performed with the help of the formula ( [ b3 ] ) , where one should put @xmath355 and @xmath356 . as a result , we have @xmath357\right ) ^{1/2}=\left ( \det [ \delta^2(c\gamma)^2+d_\gamma ( c\gamma)^{-1 } d_\gamma^t c\gamma]\right ) ^{1/2}. \label{b5}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we evaluate the expression ( [ b5 ] ) in two cases , ( i ) when @xmath341 and @xmath342 , where @xmath358 is presented in ( [ 9 ] ) , and ( ii ) when @xmath340 and @xmath345 , where @xmath359 is given in ( [ 90 ] ) . * ( i ) the case @xmath360 and @xmath361*. taking into account the relations @xmath362 and @xmath363 ( @xmath59 ) , we obtain from ( [ b5 ] ) @xmath364\right ) ^{1/2}\equiv\left ( \det b\right ) ^{1/2 } , \label{b7}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath365 . using the general relation @xmath366 , we get from ( [ b7 ] ) : @xmath367 ( a more detailed consideration of operator traces is presented in appendix a of the paper @xcite . ) in this formula the symbol tr means the trace of an operator both in the coordinate and internal spaces . moreover , @xmath368 ( @xmath120 ) in ( [ b8 ] ) are four eigenvalues of the 4@xmath2914 fourier transformation matrix @xmath369 of the operator @xmath370 from ( [ b7 ] ) . namely , @xmath371 where @xmath372 . it is clear from these relations that @xmath101 are even functions vs @xmath0 and/or @xmath1 . so , it is enough to take into account only nonnegative values of the chemical potentials @xmath0 and @xmath1 . * ( ii ) the case @xmath373 and @xmath374*. in this case @xmath375 . then it follows from ( [ b5 ] ) that @xmath376\right ) ^{1/2}\equiv\left ( \det { \cal b}\right ) ^{1/2 } , \label{b10}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath377 . then , similar to ( [ b8 ] ) , it is easy to find that in the case under consideration @xmath378 where @xmath379 ( @xmath120 ) are four eigenvalues of the 4@xmath2914 fourier transformation matrix @xmath380 of the operator @xmath381 from ( [ b10 ] ) . it turns out that the eigenvalues @xmath379 are connected with the eigenvalues @xmath368 ( [ b12 ] ) by the simple relations @xmath382 to calculate the improper convergent integral in ( [ 31 ] ) we first use there a polar coordinate system , i.e. @xmath383 , and then restrict the @xmath384-integration region by @xmath137 ( suppose in addition that @xmath385 ) . as a result , we come to the regularized expression @xmath386 of the tdp ( [ 31 ] ) , @xmath387 , where @xmath388,\label{c9}\\ i_\pm&=&-\int_0^\lambda\frac{pdp}{2\pi}\left ( \mu-\sqrt{m^2+(p\pm\mu_5)^2}\right ) \theta\left ( \mu-\sqrt{m^2+(p\pm\mu_5)^2}\right ) . \label{c10}\end{aligned}\ ] ] due to the presence of the @xmath389-functions in ( [ c10 ] ) and sufficiently high values of the cutoff parameter @xmath390 , the quantities @xmath391 indeed do not depend on @xmath137 . moreover , it is evident that @xmath392 is a nonzero quantity only in the case @xmath393 . hence , substituting @xmath394 for the @xmath392-integration in ( [ c10 ] ) , we have @xmath395 ( the upper limit in the integral ( [ c12 ] ) corresponds to a value of the momentum @xmath384 , where the @xmath396-function of the integrand for @xmath392 from ( [ c10 ] ) is equal to zero , i.e. to a value of @xmath384 determined by the condition @xmath397 . ) it is convenient to present the quantity @xmath398 from ( [ c10 ] ) as a sum of two integrals , @xmath399 , where @xmath400 it is clear that @xmath401 is a nonzero quantity only at @xmath402 . then , performing in the integral ( [ c14 ] ) the substitution @xmath403 , we obtain @xmath404 obviously , we have @xmath405 at @xmath406 . to evaluate @xmath407 at other values of @xmath0 , we should , first , substitute @xmath408 in the integral ( [ c13 ] ) and then consider two different regions of the parameter @xmath0 , ( i ) @xmath409 , ( ii ) @xmath410 . as a result , we have @xmath411 summing the expressions ( [ c12 ] ) , ( [ c15 ] ) and ( [ c16 ] ) , we have @xmath412 to calculate the @xmath413-term of the regularized tdp @xmath386 , it is useful to present @xmath413 as a sum of three integrals , each one corresponds to some square root expression of the integrand in ( [ c9 ] ) . then , substituting @xmath394 and @xmath403 in two of these integrals , it is possible to present @xmath413 in the form @xmath414 since @xmath415 , we an use @xmath416 in the last two terms of ( [ c4 ] ) . then , after integrations one can see that the sum of these two last integrals in ( [ c4 ] ) is equal to zero in the limit @xmath146 . hence , @xmath417.\label{c11}\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally , performing in ( [ c17 ] ) trivial table integrations and using the relation @xmath418 we obtain from ( [ c0 ] ) , ( [ c17 ] ) and ( [ c11 ] ) the expression ( [ c18 ] ) ( the function @xmath419 is given in the text below ( [ 32 ] ) ) . d. ebert and m.k . volkov , z. phys . c * 16 * , 205 ( 1983 ) ; d. ebert , h. reinhardt and m.k . volkov , prog . phys . * 33 * , 1 ( 1994 ) . m. buballa , phys . * 407 * , 205 ( 2005 ) . y. nambu and g. jona - lasinio , phys . rev.*122 * , 345 ( 1961 ) ; phys . rev . * 124 * , 246 ( 1961 ) . a. chodos and h. minakata , phys . a * 191 * , 39 ( 1994 ) ; lect . notes phys . * 508 * , 231 ( 1998 ) [ hep - th/9709197 ] ; h. caldas , j.l . kneur , m.b . pinto and r.o . ramos , phys . b * 77 * , 205109 ( 2008 ) . v. schn and m. thies , at the frontier of particle physics : handbook of qcd : boris ioffe festschrift , vol . * 3 * , 1945 , world scientific ( 2001 ) [ hep - th/0008175 ] ; m. thies , j. phys . a * 39 * , 12707 ( 2006 ) . semenoff , i.a . shovkovy and l.c.r . wijewardhana , mod . a * 13 * , 1143 ( 1998 ) . zhukovsky , k.g . klimenko , v.v . khudyakov and d. ebert , jetp lett . * 73 * , 121 ( 2001 ) ; v.c . zhukovsky and k.g . klimenko , theor . math . phys . * 134 * , 254 ( 2003 ) ; e.j . ferrer , v.p . gusynin and v. de la incera , mod . b * 16 * , 107 ( 2002 ) ; eur . j. b * 33 * , 397 ( 2003 ) . marino and l.h.c.m . nunes , nucl . b * 741 * , 404 ( 2006 ) ; l.h.c.m . nunes , r.l.s . farias and e.c . marino , phys . a * 376 * , 779 ( 2012 ) . klimenko , r.n . zhokhov and v.c . zhukovsky , phys . d * 86 * , 105010 ( 2012 ) . klimenko , r.n . zhokhov and v.c . zhukovsky , mod . lett . a * 28 * , 1350096 ( 2013 ) . d. mesterhazy , j. berges , and l. von smekal , phys . b * 86 * , 245431 ( 2012 ) . d. ebert , k.g . klimenko , p.b . kolmakov and v.c . zhukovsky , arxiv:1509.08093 [ cond-mat.mes-hall ] . klimenko , z. phys . c * 37 * , 457 ( 1988 ) ; b. rosenstein , b.j . warr , and s.h . park , phys . d * 39 * , 3088 ( 1989 ) ; phys . lett . * 62 * , 1433 ( 1989 ) . klimenko , z. phys . c * 54 * , 323 ( 1992 ) ; theor . * 89 * , 1161 ( 1992 ) ; theor . math . * 90 * , 1 ( 1992 ) ; v.p . gusynin , v.a . miransky and i.a . shovkovy , phys . lett . * 73 * , 3499 ( 1994 ) ; a.s . vshivtsev , b.v . magnitsky and k.g . klimenko , phys . atom . nucl . * 57 * , 2171 ( 1994 ) ; theor . phys . * 106 * , 319 ( 1996 ) ; v.p . gusynin , d.k . hong and i.a . shovkovy , phys . d * 57 * , 5230 ( 1998 ) . a. chodos , h. minakata , f. cooper , a. singh , and w. mao , phys . d * 61 * , 045011 ( 2000 ) . d. ebert , k.g . klimenko and h. toki , phys . d * 64 * , 014038 ( 2001 ) ; h. kohyama , phys . d * 77 * , 045016 ( 2008 ) ; phys . d * 78 * , 014021 ( 2008 ) . d. ebert , k.g . klimenko , a.v . tyukov and v.c . zhukovsky , phys . d * 78 * , 045008 ( 2008 ) ; d. ebert , k.g . klimenko , phys . * d80 * , 125013 ( 2009 ) ; d. ebert , n.v . gubina , k.g . klimenko , s.g . kurbanov and v.c . zhukovsky , phys . d * 84 * , 025004 ( 2011 ) . gubina , k.g . klimenko , s.g . kurbanov and v.c . zhukovsky , phys . d * 86 * , 085011 ( 2012 ) ; moscow univ . phys . bull . * 67 * , 131 ( 2012 ) . kneur , m.b . pinto , r.o . ramos and e. staudt , d * 76 * , 045020 ( 2007 ) ; phys . lett . b * 657 * , 136 ( 2007 ) . klimenko , z. phys . c * 50 * , 477 ( 1991 ) ; mod . lett . a * 9 * , 1767 ( 1994 ) . i. ojima and r. fukuda , prog . phys . * 57 * , 1720 ( 1977 ) . a.n . vasiliev and g.y . panasyuk , theor . * 103 * , 570 ( 1995 ) [ teor . mat . * 103 * , 295 ( 1995 ) ] . m. thies , phys . d * 68 * , 047703 ( 2003 ) ; phys . d * 90 * , no . 10 , 105017 ( 2014 ) . d. ebert , t.g . khunjua , k.g . klimenko and v.c . zhukovsky , phys . d * 90 * , 045021 ( 2014 ) . n.d . mermin and h. wagner , phys . * 17 * , 1133 ( 1966 ) ; s. coleman , commun . 31 * , 259 ( 1973 ) . andrianov , d. espriu and x. planells , eur . j. c * 73 * , 2294 ( 2013 ) ; eur . j. c * 74 * , 2776 ( 2014 ) ; r. gatto and m. ruggieri , phys . d * 85 * , 054013 ( 2012 ) ; m. ruggieri , arxiv:1110.4907 ; l. yu , h. liu and m. huang , phys . rev . d * 90 * , 074009 ( 2014 ) ; l. yu , h. liu and m. huang , arxiv:1511.03073 [ hep - ph ] ; g. cao and p. zhuang , phys . d * 92 * , 105030 ( 2015 ) . braguta and a.y . kotov , arxiv:1601.04957 [ hep - th ] . zhukovsky , k.g . klimenko and v.v . khudyakov , theor . phys . * 124 * , 1132 ( 2000 ) [ teor . mat . * 124 * , 323 ( 2000 ) ] . b. vanderheyden and a.d . jackson , phys . d * 61 * , 076004 ( 2000 ) ; v.c . zhukovsky , v.v . khudyakov , k.g . klimenko and d. ebert , jetp lett . * 74 * , 523 ( 2001 ) [ pisma zh . teor . fiz . * 74 * , 595 ( 2001 ) ] . g. cao , l. he and p. zhuang , phys . d * 90 * , 056005 ( 2014 ) . a.n . vasiliev,``functional methods in quantum field theory and statistical physics '' , leningrad univ . press , leningrad , 1976 . Abstract:
[ "in this paper the duality correspondence between fermion - antifermion and difermion interaction channels is established in two ( 2 + 1)-dimensional gross - neveu type models with a fermion number chemical potential @xmath0 and a chiral chemical potential @xmath1 . the role and influence of this property on the phase structure of the models are investigated . in particular , it is shown that the chemical potential @xmath1 promotes the appearance of dynamical chiral symmetry breaking , whereas the chemical potential @xmath0 contributes to the emergence of superconductivity ." ]
13,265
13,265
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the emergence of slow modes of relaxations is a major signature of the glassy behavior . @xcite the first consequence of large equilibration time is that the properties of a glass evolve on experimental timescales , the system ages . despite the huge amount of work that has been devoted to glassy systems , a general understanding of slow relaxation processes and of their relation to macroscopic rheology is still lacking . for example , experimental and numerical data converge to a stretched exponential shape of relaxation phenomena , the so - called kohlrausch - williams - watts ( kww ) relaxation , @xcite while mode coupling theory predicts power law behavior . @xcite when it comes to extend these results to non - linear rheology , the situation is even more difficult from the theoretical point of view , since the system is driven far from equilibrium . at an applied strain rate , power law viscosities or the emergence of a yield stress , are common features of complex fluids . @xcite md simulations of lennard - jones systems @xcite and recent experiments on colloidal glasses @xcite are also consistent with such properties . recent theoretical approaches to non - linear rheology @xcite have called on ideas originating in mode coupling theory , or trap models of spin glasses . @xcite these approaches , however , fail to provide a description of non - linear rheology that is consistent with experimental observations ; @xcite moreover , these models , based only on a phase - space picture of glassiness , do not lead to a clear identification of real - space physical mechanism that are responsible for an observed macroscopic behavior . some other attempts have been directed towards phenomenological approaches , @xcite but those are still unsatisfactory , and do not offer a microscopic picture , even heuristic , of the undergoing physical mechanisms . the current work lies at the convergence point of several recent theoretical ideas in various fields . firstly , it is based on the idea by liu , nagel and coworkers , that some unique mechanism lies behind the profound similarities displayed by structural glassy materials , be they colloidal glasses , granular materials , foams , @xcite drawing on this idea , the fundemental assumption underlying the current work is that macroscopic properties of dense materials results from major _ dynamical _ properties of structural rearrangement of the contact network . another important element of the current work comes from the study of density relaxation in granular materials . @xcite under vertical tapping , granular materials present a time - logarithmic relaxation of the occupied volume ; this is in strong analogy with free - volume relaxation , commonly observed in glasses , and of central importance for aging . @xcite however , in the case of tapped granular materials , density relaxation can not result from thermal activation since there is no thermal bath : the logarithmic density relaxation has been explained by introducing an equation of motion for free - volume , which characterizes the internal state of the granular material . finally , this work uses a theory introduced recently by falk and langer to account for elasto - plastic transition in amorphous solids . @xcite the so - called shear transformation zone ( stz ) theory , originates from ideas by argon , spaepen and others to describe creep in metallic alloys ; @xcite it has been primarily developed in the framework of fracture mechanics , and provides a general scheme for jamming as resulting from a structuration of the material by creation of arrangements oriented along principal directions of an applied stress . stz theory calls to free - volume arguments , but in fact , free - volume remains a parameter and enters constants of the theory . these ideas lead me to propose a general approach to the rheology of dense materials , leading to a simple set of constitutive equations . @xcite the purpose of the this article is to elaborate the theoretical arguments underlying these equations a to detail some of their consequences . two types of internal state variables are used : free - volume , which is an isotropic property of a molecular packing , and populations of arrangements , which are related to the distortion of the contact network between molecules ( hence introduce anisotropy ) . those variables evolves dynamically by free - volume activated processes : two types of rearrangements are associated to compaction and shear motion . free - volume enters activation factors that control both types of elementary rearrangements , and it is also a dynamical quantity . kww relaxation has been shown to result from the existence of a distribution of timescales ; @xcite and it seems that this is often thought to be a necessary requirement . the first contribution of the current work is to show that it is not necessary , and that kww relaxation also result from a more simple mechanism : the interplay between free - volume logarithmic relaxation and free - volume activated shear deformation . the second contribution of this work is to establish a relation between kww relaxation , time - logarithmic density relaxation , and power law viscosity of a strongly sheared glassy material . a single parameter of the theory determines these three types of phenomena . power law viscosity will be shown to result from the existence of shear induced dilatancy . i propose one of the simplest set of equations that can account for those three properties is a single framework . the third contribution of this work is to present a theoretical framework which accounts for two coexisting mechanisms for jamming . in mode - coupling theory , jamming results from an entropy crisis : at low temperature , the system supports any applied stress because no motion of molecules is allowed . resistance to shear is therefore an intrinsic property of a material , determined by the thermodynamic parameters of the system , and results from a phase transition . in stz theory , jamming results from a structuration of the contact network : jamming requires some amount of plastic deformation to induce the creation of anisotropic structures that can support a static stress . those two mechanisms are shown here to be incorporated in a unique theory . the difference between hard and soft glassy materials will be identified with the cases when one or the other process dominates . the interplay between those two mechanisms lead to a novel interpretation of brittleness and ductility , and provide age - dependent dynamical yield criteria . the main assumption made in this work is that the out - of - equilibrium dynamics of a glass can be modeled in the framework of a mean - field approximation . by mean - field , i mean that spatially averaged quantities account for the local state of the material . constitutive equations are proposed that relate the average shear stress , to the average shear strain . the internal state of the material is determined by free - volume and by densities of arrangements ( to be defined further ) . the forces in the material are supposed to be characterized by a stress tensor , which is written @xmath0 where @xmath1 is the pressure , and @xmath2 the shear stress . the deformation tensor is defined accordingly , and composed of shear , and of isotropic deformations , directly related to dilatancy . the average free - volume per molecule is denoted @xmath3 , and is related to the total volume @xmath4 by , @xmath5 where @xmath6 is the volume per molecule of the material in random close packing , and @xmath7 is the number of molecules . under strong shear , soft glassy materials , like clays , foams , or granular materials , can achieve large deformations ; the evolution of the system is more similar to the flow of a liquid than to the deformation of a solid . in this work i present a theory of deformation that is expected to hold for large deformations of amorphous solids or soft glassy materials . since there is a long - standing matter of debate in the mechanical community about linear versus non - linear deformations , @xcite it seems necessary to clarify this issue . i show here that the notion of inherent states @xcite offers a simple physical interpretation of small and large deformations . at low temperature , a supercooled liquid or a glassy material evolves in a complex energy landscape which can be partitioned in domains of influence of local minima . for almost all geometrical configuration of the molecules , a unique inherent state is defined as the local minimum to which the systems relaxes if suddenly quenched to zero temperature , @xcite and in the absence of forcing . when a material is forced , a constant stress or strain pulls the system through the energy landscape . each geometrical configuration reached lies in the domain associated with an instantaneous inherent state . the time series of instantaneous inherent states provides a coarse - grained description of the deformation of the material , and is taken here as the definition of irreversible , plastic , deformation . the instantaneous inherent state is a natural reference state for a given molecular configuration , and deviation from the instantaneous inherent state defines an _ inherent ( shear ) deformation _ starting from a known initial configuration , the total shear deformation , @xmath9 , results both from inherent deformation , and from the _ flow _ of inherent states in the phase space . by definition , the deformation @xmath10 is measured between two inherent states : it is not a state variable , since it is defined only from the knowledge of a configuration designed as `` initial '' . @xmath8 , however , is a state variable , since it is well defined for any instantaneous configuration of the system . moreover , @xmath8 is expected to be small , since it measures the deformation between two nearby configurations in phase space ; elasticity results from a harmonic approximation for every local minimum : it permits to write the stress as given by a hooke law , @xmath11 . the equation that governs @xmath2 can finally be written : @xmath12 the rate of plastic deformation @xmath13 will come out of a statistical analysis of hopping motion in the phase - space . it will be written as a function of the state variables of the system , @xmath2 , @xmath3 , an others , to define the constitutive law of the material . this work relies on the idea that , in dense materials , macroscopic deformation results from free - volume activated rearrangements . this is expected because temperature is so low that thermal activation becomes irrelevant , and activated processes are controlled by entropic fluctuations of the free - volume . a rearrangements occurs if sufficient space exists in the neighborhood of a given point ; the transition probabilities are thus determined by the size distribution of voids . in order to work at a mean - field level , the volume distribution is characterized by the single scalar value @xmath3 ; in order to write activation factors , it is necessary to provide an ansatz for the distribution of voids in the material . in the original works by cohen and turnbull on free - volume theory , it was argued that the voids in a material are given by a poisson distribution . @xcite in their picture , the motion of a molecule in a glassy material is permitted only if it can move into a hole of size , say @xmath14 . the probability to find a hole larger than @xmath14 , is proportional to @xmath15 : this leads to estimate a diffusion constant @xmath16 , which is a basis of free - volume approaches . important differences , however , exist between various uses and interpretations of free - volume theory . falk and langer use free - volume activation factors in the definition of stz theory . @xcite their argument borrowed from original ideas by edwards and coworkers for granular materials : @xcite the only extensive variable is supposed to be the volume @xmath4 ; the number of states available to the system is roughly proportional to @xmath17 , where @xmath18 is an arbitrary constant with dimension of a volume ; the entropy is defined as , @xmath19 and the intensive quantity , analogous to temperature , is @xmath20 : @xmath21 free - volume thus enters activation factors of the form @xmath15 . in stz theory , this discussion turns out to be somewhat formal since free - volume is taken constant : @xmath3 is absorbed in the phenomenological constants of the resulting equations . it also leads to complicated expressions for transition rates as functions of the applied stress ( because @xmath14 is supposed to be a function of @xmath2 ) . however , free - volume should vary when the material dilates or contracts . this idea has been considered recently by several authors in the analysis of density relaxation of granular materials subjected to vertical tapping . @xcite in these works , free - volume is understood as a purely dynamical quantity , and relaxes by the motion of single grains in holes created by volume fluctuations . a poisson distribution of volume fluctuations is assumed at all times : this leads to an equation of motion of the form , @xmath22 \quad . \label{eqn : vf:0}\ ] ] the activation factor @xmath23 $ ] is the probability that a hole of size larger than @xmath14 is present at a given point in the material ; @xmath24 is determined by the tapping frequency . the current work borrows from those different lines of thought . drawing on the works initiated on granular compaction , free - volume is a dynamical quantity ; voids are expected to redistribute fast enough in the material ; fast means , faster than free - volume activated collective rearrangements themselves . this is justified because redistribution of free - volume requires very tiny displacements of the molecules , and voids , considered as particles , are expected to diffuse faster than molecules themselves : around a void , there is by definition an excess of free - volume . there is an important difference , however , from the picture used in @xcite where compaction results from the motion of a single grain in a hole . here , borrowing on the argument of stz theory , compaction results from elementary rearrangements , involving several molecules at a mesoscopic scale . probabilities of transitions are estimated by entropic arguments . due to the redistribution of voids , the number of states available to the system is supposed to be proportional to @xmath17 at all times : the fast redistribution of voids allows the system to realize a quasi - equilibrium thermodynamic ensemble , determined by an intensive variable , @xmath3 . the existence of an intensive variable , associated to the fluctuations of molecular configurations , is supported by the observation of an effective fluctuation - dissipation theorem in sheared fluids . @xcite for reasons of clarity , and to be specific , i reserve the word temperature for the intensive quantity associated with the fluctuations of energy , or for the specific kinetic energy;therefore , i will not comply with to the recent use of `` effective temperature '' for something that is neither thermodynamic nor granular temperature . nevertheless , the observation of an effective fluctuation - dissipation theorem indicates that such an intensive quantity exists , without identifying what this quantity actually is . here , it is identified to @xmath3 and is associated with entropic fluctuations of molecular configurations at a mesoscopic scale . the important novelty introduced in the current work it that @xmath3 enters activation factors and is also a dynamical quantity . this is in weak analogy with granular temperature , which is a temperature , and evolves dynamically . but granular temperature couples with properties of the material only as far as it determines a collision frequency , @xcite while free - volume enters exponential prefactors in transformation rates . another important element of the current theory is that the dynamics of free - volume results both from density relaxation by activated rearrangements which exists in the absence of forcing and from dilatancy induced by the macroscopic shear flow which occurs when the system is driven out - of - equilibrium . the non - linear coupling with the mean - flow will be addressed later ; i will first continue the description of rearrangement processes . the typical elementary compaction process , corresponds to the system going through a saddle point in phase space . the rate of such transformations is controlled by free - volume fluctuations and this saddle is characterized by a typical activation volume @xmath14 , which depends on the shape of the molecules , and on the details of microscopic interactions . the activated hopping of the system through this type of saddle permits density relaxation , and leads to an equation of motion for @xmath3 of the form ( [ eqn : vf:0 ] ) . other types of elementary rearrangements occur in the material , in particular leading to elementary shear motion . before presenting a more elaborate scheme for macroscopic shear deformation , let me use a very minimal argument : shear strain is supposed to be proportional to shear stress : @xmath25 ; where @xmath26 is proportional to a free - volume activation factor . the current approach relies on the remark that the relative motion of molecules that permit compaction and shear are different ; different types of collective rearrangements , should require different activation volumes . in phase space , shear and compaction correspond to two types of saddle points , and those saddle points are entropic barriers of different heights . the activation volume for an elementary shear is denoted @xmath27 , and _ a priori _ differs from @xmath14 . this leads to @xmath28\,\sigma \quad . \label{eqn : dotgamma:0}\ ] ] one major purpose of this work is to study the consequences of introducing complexity , not through a non - trivial distribution of timescales , @xcite but through the existence of two types of entropy barriers of unequal heights . the set of equations ( [ eqn : sigma:0 ] ) , ( [ eqn : vf:0 ] ) , and ( [ eqn : dotgamma:0 ] ) will be shown to account for logarithmic relaxation of @xmath3 and for a kww relaxation of the stress after a strain increment . [ [ shear - transformation - zones . ] ] shear transformation zones . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + equation ( [ eqn : dotgamma:0 ] ) accounts for a free - volume dependent viscosity : the material described is a liquid ( in fact a non - newtonian liquid ) . it is however , a very rough description of shear motion . the theoretical description of shear deformation that i present is directly inspired by stz theory . @xcite the first assumption on which stz theory is based is that elementary shear deformation does not occur just anywhere in the material , but in zones , where a rearrangement is permitted by the local configuration of molecules . a shear transformation zone ( stz ) is thus defined as a locus within a material , where an elementary shear is possible . another essential assumption is that stz s are two - state systems . this can be understood as follows : an elementary arrangement corresponds to the opening and closing of some contacts between molecules ; once such a rearrangement has occurred somewhere in the material , these molecules can not shear further in the same direction , but they can shear backwards . a symmetry is thus introduced by shearing motion , and ( at least ) two types of arrangements can be identified that are transformed into one another , as pictured here : = 0.0011 ( 100,60)(0,0 ) ( 50,40)(0,0)@xmath29 ( 50,0)(0,0)@xmath30 ( -50,0 ) note that an stz is not supposed to contain only four molecules , but it is a mesoscopic object that accounts for the structure of several neighboring molecules ( say of order 10 ) . to simplify the analysis , only one pair of types of arrangements is considered , aligned along the principal directions of the stress tensor . macroscopic motion results from the statistics of elementary rearrangements , and reads : @xmath31 where @xmath32 denote the number density of arrangements , and where @xmath33 denote the rate of transition @xmath34 . those rates result from activation processes determined by free - volume , but also by force fluctuations . a stz shears if there is sufficient free - volume at its location , and if the local bias of the force network triggers the shear in the appropriate direction . in this work , force and volume fluctuations are supposed to be uncorrelated ; the probabilities associated with those two types of fluctuations factorize : @xmath35 . from the preceding discussion , @xmath36 . in order to estimate the factors @xmath37 associated with the fluctuations of the force network , let me first remark that @xmath38 is a positive , increasing function of @xmath2 . moreover , an elementary shear is expected to be triggered by _ large forces_. the distributions of static forces in glassy systems have been shown to share strong similarities with the force distribution in a granular material , @xcite in which case , large forces are distributed exponentially . @xcite this justifies an exponential dependency of @xmath37 on @xmath2 : @xmath39\,\exp\left[{\pm{\sigma\over\bar\mu}}\right ] \quad,\ ] ] with @xmath40 , the update frequency of microscopic processes . note however , that the exponential form for the activation factors @xmath37 plays no role in the following , since these factors will be linearized . the parameter @xmath41 measures the typical stress that must be overcome to trigger a rearrangement . in hard - sphere systems , it is expected to be proportional to the pressure @xmath1 . in general , @xmath41 is essentially the energy required to break a bond between two molecules , times the density of bonds . here , @xmath41 will be taken constant , either because @xmath1 fixed , or because it depends on some interaction potential . at some point , @xmath41 will be set to unity , which fixes the unit of forces . [ [ dynamics - of - arrangements . ] ] dynamics of arrangements . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + following @xcite , the equation of motion for the populations @xmath32 is written , @xmath42 the first two terms of the rhs account for the transitions between both types of stz . the last term accounts for the renewal of molecular configuration by the macroscopic flow : stz constantly appear and disappear during plastic deformation . the renewal of configurations is supposed to be proportional to the work of plastic deformation , @xmath43 , which is thus a common factor of creation and annhilitation terms . [ [ shear - induced - dilatancy . ] ] shear - induced dilatancy . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in this work , the dynamics of rearrangements is coupled to free - volume dynamics . part of this coupling results from the factor @xmath44 that controls shear transformation , but the macroscopic flow is also expected to influence the relaxation of free - volume . free - volume dynamics is derived in analogy with the dynamics of the populations @xmath32 : plastic deformations corresponds to the evolution of the system in the phase - space along trajectories that do not necessarily permit a minimization of free - volume . in real space , plastic deformation requires the constant renewal of local arrangements , and new arrangements are local configurations of large entropy ; by definition , their density is not optimized . therefore , the renewal of configurations by the shear flow leads to dilatancy . in experiments on suspensions , for example , the system is fluidized by applying a strong shear which rejuvenates the glassy structure . @xcite in order to quantify the average dilatancy induced by the shear flow , i assume that a fraction of the work of plastic deformation , @xmath45 in used for enthalpy production , @xmath46 . the equation for @xmath3 is : @xmath47 + { { \cal a}_v\over p}\,\sigma\,\dot\gamma \label{eqn : vf:1}\ ] ] this equation is an essential element of the current theory . the non - linear coupling with the macroscopic flow shows up when the system is strongly driven out - of - equilibrium . the competition between self - relaxation and shear induced dilatancy will be shown to lead to a power law viscosity . from ( [ eqn : stz : npm ] ) , the equation of motion for the total density , @xmath48 , of arrangements reads , @xmath49 the creation and destruction terms account for an entropic mixing of molecular configurations . the previous equation shows that this mixing leads to a convergence of @xmath50 to an asymptotic value , @xmath51 ; therefore , @xmath52 defines a state of maximal entropy of molecular configurations . for this reason , i do not expect @xmath50 to be different from @xmath53 unless in very special circumstances , _ e.g. _ if some level of crystallization exists in the material . in particular , an amorphous solid is usually produced by a rapid quench of a liquid at low temperature : the system comes from a state of high entropy , therefore , in the resulting glass , @xmath50 is expected to achieve its asymptotic value . in this work , i assume that @xmath52 at all times . the dynamics of local arrangements is thus determined only by the bias @xmath54 between the populations of stz . equations ( [ eqn : stz:0 ] ) and ( [ eqn : stz : npm ] ) are written in a more suitable form by introducing the variable @xmath55 and parameters , @xmath56 , @xmath57 , and @xmath58 . it is also convenient to introduce @xmath59 , @xmath60 and @xmath61 , and to rescale free - volume as , @xmath62 the complete set of constitutive equations is finally : @xmath63\ , \left(\sinh\left({\sigma\over\bar\mu}\right)-\delta\,\cosh\left({\sigma\over\bar\mu}\right)\right)\\ \label{eqn : stzdil:2 } \dot\delta&=&{\ddpl\over\epsilon_0}\,\left(1- \mu_0\,\sigma\,\delta\right)\\ \label{eqn : stzdil:3 } \dot\chi & = & -e_1 \exp\left[-{\kappa\over\chi}\right ] + \alpha\,\sigma\,\ddpl \quad.\end{aligned}\ ] ] those equations involve two state variables , @xmath64 and @xmath20 which play very different roles . @xmath64 evolves only when the material is sheared , therefore accounts for some sort of structural memory induced by deformation imposed on the material . on the contrary , @xmath20 evolves spontaneously , and relaxes towards 0 . since this relaxation is slow , @xmath20 also encodes some sort of memory , but a very different type of memory than @xmath64 , a memory which constantly evolves as the system ages . note that the asymptotic value for the relaxation of @xmath20 ( which here is 0 ) may , in fact , be temperature dependent ; this question is eluded in the current work : it seems a very reasonable assumption for materials like suspensions if not for glasses below the glass transition , because the logarithmic slow - down of density relaxation around @xmath65 prevents it to reach asymptotic values far below ( @xmath66 ) . the parameters involved in the theory should depend on pressure and temperature , and this dependency results from particularities of a given material ; for example the update frequencies @xmath24 and @xmath40 are expected to be proportional to @xmath67 ( where @xmath68 is the temperature ) in a dense hard - sphere material . @xcite such questions , however , are not the focus of this study ; in this article , the values of the parameters are constant and can be understood as a given thermodynamical state of the system . equations ( [ eqn : stzdil:1]-[eqn : stzdil:3 ] ) present non - linear couplings between shear motion and density relaxation . before studying the complete set of equations in various tests , i start with two simple cases , when one or the other process dominates . i show here that jamming transitions are captured by equations ( [ eqn : stzdil:1]-[eqn : stzdil:2 ] ) , and free - volume relaxation by equation ( [ eqn : stzdil:3 ] ) . in the absence of shear stress , @xmath69 and @xmath70 ; the system ( [ eqn : stzdil:1]-[eqn : stzdil:3 ] ) reduces to the single equation : @xmath71 \quad,\ ] ] which accounts for density relaxation . at short time , this process is dominated by the initial value , @xmath72 : @xmath73 \quad;\ ] ] this defines a time scale for short - time free - volume relaxation : @xmath74 \quad.\ ] ] the long time behavior is estimated from the integral expression : @xmath75 \d \chi \simeq \kappa\,\exp\left[{\kappa\over \chi(t)}\right]\ ] ] at long time , the integral is dominated by the small values of @xmath20 , _ i.e. _ by the ultimate value reached , @xmath76 . therefore , @xmath77 free - volume relaxes logarithmically with time : in the absence of any forcing , the system ages . in order to isolate the stz mechanism for jamming , i now assume that free - volume is constant , at some value @xmath20 ; the evolution of the system is governed by equations ( [ eqn : stzdil:1 ] ) and ( [ eqn : stzdil:2 ] ) only , and a constant stress @xmath2 is applied . these equations admit two stationary solutions : a jammed state for which , @xmath78 , and @xmath79 a steady deformation regime , for which , @xmath80 and , @xmath81\ , \left(\sinh\left({\sigma\over\bar\mu}\right)-{1\over\mu_0 \sigma}\,\cosh\left({\sigma\over\bar\mu}\right)\right ) \quad.\ ] ] the latter solution is unstable at small stresses , in which case , the material jams . for large stresses , the jammed state loose stability , and steady deformation results . the two solutions exchange stability at the yield stress @xmath82 , which is the solution of : @xmath83 in the following , i will consider several limiting cases of the general constitutive equations ( [ eqn : stzdil:1]-[eqn : stzdil:3 ] ) . in particular , the exponential dependency of @xmath84 as a function of @xmath2 will not be studied , although this non - linearity might be important in some cases . @xcite activation factors involving @xmath2 will thus be linearized ; this is valid under the assumption that @xmath85 ; @xmath41 is then incorporated into constants by taking it to unity . it leads to : @xmath86\,\left(\sigma-\delta\right)\\ \label{eqn : stzdil : lin:2 } \dot\delta&=&{\ddpl\over\epsilon_0}\,\left(1- \mu_0\,\sigma\,\delta\right)\\ \label{eqn : stzdil : lin:3 } \dot \chi & = & -e_1 \exp\left[-{\kappa/\chi}\right]+\alpha\,\sigma\ddpl \quad.\end{aligned}\ ] ] i will also consider an _ isotropic ( liquid ) limit _ , where the structural anisotropy , measured by @xmath64 plays no role . this is the case either at timescales when the dynamics of @xmath64 is too slow , @xmath87 ( and @xmath88 ) or because the typical stress @xmath89 vanishes . in this case , the rheology is determined by a single state variable : @xmath90\,\sigma\\ \label{eqn : stzdil : iso:2 } \dot \chi & = & -e_1 \exp\left[-{\kappa/\chi}\right]+\alpha\,\sigma\ddpl \quad.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the sets of equations ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1]-[eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) and ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1]-[eqn : stzdil : iso:2 ] ) will be helpful to emphasize the roles of @xmath64 versus @xmath20 . many aspects of glassiness will be shown to be captured by equations ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1 ] ) and ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:2 ] ) . jamming , however , is not captured at this level of simplification , and requires the existence of the variable @xmath64 . a word about the preparation of the sample : at time @xmath91 , the system is quenched from a highly mixed state , in which , @xmath88 and @xmath20 is large . the sample then ages during a waiting time , @xmath92 without any forcing . after this relaxation , some test is performed on the system . two main experimental procedures consist in forcing the stress , or forcing the deformation . if a stress , @xmath2 , is applied , the plastic deformation @xmath93 is determined by constitutive equations , and the total deformation is , @xmath94 . if the deformation , @xmath95 , is forced , the evolution of @xmath2 is given by equation ( [ eqn : sigma:0 ] ) , and couples to constitutive equations . if a small perturbation is applied to the sample , the response of the system results from first order terms in the linearized constitutive equations ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1]-[eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) , or ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1]-[eqn : stzdil : iso:2 ] ) . in relaxation processes , however , the linear approximation is not always valid at long times , @xcite because , the activation factors can become small , possibly smaller than non - linear terms . in the current theory , all non - linear terms involve the work of plastic deformation @xmath96 . therefore , the linear analysis is valid so long as this work is small compared to relaxation processes . stress relaxation is monitored after a small strain step . the step can be understood as a ramp in the deformation , which occurs on a very small time interval around @xmath92 . the strain @xmath97 determines the initial value of the stress , @xmath98 . during the relaxation , @xmath99 ; the subsequent evolution of the stress is governed by @xmath100 , and accounts for the plastic adaptation of the material to the imposed strain . the relaxation modulus , @xmath101 is the correlator associated with rearrangement processes : it measures the correlation between the initial state of the material , and its state at any following time , @xmath102 . assuming that the diffusion of molecules is dominated by collective rearrangements , stress relaxation can then be compared with the decay of self - intermediate scattering functions , which measure the spatial decorrelation resulting from the diffusion of particles in the dense medium . @xcite the long - time behavior of correlation functions is one of the major properties of glassy materials . @xcite ( see also recent reviews by debenedetti and stillinger , @xcite or angell _ et al_. @xcite ) . in the isotropic limit , the constitutive equations are ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1 ] ) and ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:2 ] ) . stress relaxation is governed by the linearized equations : @xmath103\sigma\\ \dot\chi & = & -e_1 \exp\left[-{\kappa\over\chi}\right ] \quad.\end{aligned}\ ] ] to determine the relaxation modulus , @xmath104 , the only relevant initial condition is the initial value of @xmath20 , when the strain is applied ; this value is also determined by the initial free - volume @xmath72 at time @xmath91 and by the waiting time @xmath92 . moreover , either @xmath105 or @xmath106 can be incorporated in the time scale , therefore , only two effective parameters determine all the possible outcomes of those equations : @xmath65 , and @xmath107 . while @xmath65 measures the relative heights of entropy barriers , @xmath107 measures the relative update frequencies of shear and compaction processes . at long time , the relaxation of @xmath20 is given by ( [ eqn : vf : relax ] ) , and stress relaxation verifies : @xmath108\sigma \simeq -\mu\,e_0\ , \left({e_1\,t\over\kappa}\right)^{-1/\kappa}\sigma \quad.\ ] ] the response modulus @xmath109 is , @xmath110\ ] ] with an exponent @xmath111 which is directly related to the ratio @xmath65 between the heights of entropy barriers : @xmath112 the validity of linear approximation is checked by considering the time - dependency of the work of plastic deformations @xmath96 ; this term should be compared with the first term is free - volume relaxation , @xmath113\propto { \kappa\over t } \quad.\ ] ] the stress relaxation , leads to the following evolution for the work of plastic deformations : @xmath114 \quad.\ ] ] if @xmath115 , or @xmath116 , the relaxation of @xmath96 is dominated by the exponential factor ; if @xmath117 , the stress goes to a constant , but @xmath118 decays faster than @xmath119 . in all cases , the non - linear term decays faster than the linear term , which justifies the linear approximation at all times . for @xmath116 , _ i.e. _ @xmath115 , the stress undergoes kww relaxation . this property results directly from the existence of two types of saddle points of unequal heights , when hopping motion is controlled by a logarithmically relaxing free - volume . measured values of exponent @xmath111 in glassy materials , ranging from @xmath120 to @xmath121 @xcite are consistent with , @xmath122 $ ] . the ratio @xmath65 is related to the shape of molecules , and to the details of their interactions . there is no _ a priori _ reason , from a phase space point of view , to assume a particular value for @xmath65 . in this work i will systematically study both cases in order to draw a complete picture of the phenomenology described by the proposed constitutive equations . if @xmath117 , then @xmath123 , and the previous calculation shows that the stress assumes a non - vanishing asymptotic value after relaxation . in this case , @xmath124 , and the stress relaxation towards its ultimate constant value can be further estimated as a power law : @xmath125\\ & \simeq & \exp\left[-|a|\,t_w^{-|\beta|}\right]\;\left(1+|a|\,t^{-|\beta|}\right ) \quad.\end{aligned}\ ] ] interpreting @xmath126 as a correlation function , it also means that the material never completely decorrelates from its initial state . this non - ergodicity is an indication of the glass transition as understood in mode - coupling theory @xcite ; it can be characterized by the asymptotic value @xmath127 , the edwards - anderson parameter : @xmath128 \quad,\ ] ] which increases with the age of the sample . such a dependency of the edwards - anderson parameter of the age of the sample has been observed experimentally by bonn and coworkers on a colloidal glass at very low concentrations . @xcite at short time , if free - volume can be assumed large or constant , the exponential term @xmath129 $ ] does not vary very much , and stress undergoes an exponential relaxation : @xmath130\;\left(t - t_w\right)\right ] \quad.\ ] ] this relaxation occurs on a time scale of order , @xmath131 \quad,\ ] ] which should be compared with the time scale of free - volume relaxation , @xmath132 . if @xmath133 , free - volume relaxes faster than stress , and the long time , free - volume controlled , stress relaxation can be observed . if @xmath134 , the stress relaxes exponentially before free - volume achieves sufficiently low values to slow down stress relaxation . the crossover between exponential and kww relaxation is determined by , @xmath135 or , @xmath136 \sim { \chi_0\over e_1}\;\exp\left[{\kappa\over\chi_0}\right ] \quad.\ ] ] for a large initial free - volume , this reduces to , @xmath137 kww relaxation can be observed for a larger value of @xmath105 , or for sufficiently small initial value of the free - volume , @xmath138 , ( that is for sufficiently large waiting time @xmath92 ) . in order to look at the short and long time response of the system , equations ( [ eqn : sigma:0 ] ) , ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1 ] ) and ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:2 ] ) are integrated numerically with a runge - kutta algorithm with adaptive timestep . the system is prepared in a dilute state , @xmath139 , which is allowed to relax during time @xmath92 , in the absence of any forcing ( @xmath140)=0 $ ] ) . at time @xmath92 , a strain @xmath141 is applied and produces an elastic response , @xmath142 . the dynamics of free - volume and stress are then monitored . [ [ crossover - stress . ] ] crossover stress . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in a first series of tests , @xmath92 is set to 0 , and the relaxation spectra are displayed for different values of the parameter @xmath105 . parameters @xmath143 , @xmath144 and @xmath145 are set to 1 ; @xmath146 and @xmath147 . the results are displayed figure [ fig : relax1 ] . for the first value @xmath148 , only exponential relaxation is observed because all the stress has been released before @xmath20 entered the logarithmic relaxation . the value @xmath149 corresponds to the crossover @xmath150 : kww relaxation is observed at later stages of the relaxation , with a non - vanishing values of @xmath126 . for a given @xmath72 , the stress release during the exponential part of the relaxation is proportional to @xmath106 , hence inversely proportional to @xmath105 . the plateau in the relaxation spectrum can be observed only for sufficiently large values of @xmath151 so that @xmath126 is still observable by the time @xmath20 enters the logarithmic relaxation . these relaxation curves are very similar to those observed in md simulations , @xcite or in experiments ; @xcite the general appearance of those curves depends sensibly on the parameters considered . from a practical point of view , it means that it depends on the time window that is available , numerically or experimentally . = 0.005 ( 100,110)(5,0 ) ( 10,5 ) ( 5,95)(0,0)@xmath152 ( 5,50)(0,0)@xmath126 ( 90,2)(0,0)@xmath153 [ [ aging ] ] aging + + + + + the crossover between exponential relaxation can also be studied by varying the initial free - volume . this amounts to varying the waiting time @xmath92 for a given @xmath154 . in order to observe a plateau in the relaxation spectrum , parameter @xmath105 is set to 20 , and parameters @xmath143 , @xmath144 and @xmath145 are set to 1 ; @xmath146 . in order to obtain an exponential relaxation for short waiting times , and to observe a wide variety of behavior , the initial value of @xmath20 is set to 100 . the results are displayed figure [ fig : relax2 ] . with this choice of parameter , the curves resemble experimental data . @xcite such curves strongly depend on the available experimental window , and on the width of the crossover region which is unobservable in a log - lin plot for smaller values of @xmath151 . to emphasize this point , another set of relaxation spectra is presented figure [ fig : relax ] for values of the parameters : @xmath155 , @xmath156 , and @xmath146 . the initial condition is @xmath157 and waiting times are : @xmath158 . the relaxation spectra are presented in log - lin , log - log , and log - log(log ) plot ; the crossover between exponential and kww relaxation is observable around values of the relaxation modulus of order @xmath159 , which is featureless in a log - lin plot . = 0.005 ( 100,110)(5,0 ) ( 10,5 ) ( 5,95)(0,0)@xmath152 ( 5,50)(0,0)@xmath126 ( 90,2)(0,0)@xmath160 = 0.005 ( 100,110)(5,0 ) ( 10,5 ) ( 5,95)(0,0)@xmath126 ( 5,50)(0,0)@xmath161 ( 90,2)(0,0)@xmath160 [ [ ergodic - to - non - ergodic - transition . ] ] ergodic to non - ergodic transition . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + i now consider the dependency of relaxation spectra on the parameter @xmath65 . this parameter is of primary importance in the current approach and is directly related to the existence of entropy barriers of unequal heights in the phase space . the parameters are taken to be , @xmath155 , @xmath162 , the initial condition is @xmath157 , and the waiting is set to @xmath163 . this choice is primarily motivated to obtain easily observable features on the relaxation spectrum . the results are displayed figure [ fig : relax3 ] . when @xmath65 goes to 1 , the system presents a transition to non - ergodic behavior . for @xmath117 , the asymptotic value of the stress is no longer vanishing . at the point @xmath164 , the long time relaxation of @xmath2 verifies : @xmath108\sigma \simeq -\mu\,{e_0\over e_1\,t}\sigma \quad,\ ] ] whence an asymptotic power law relaxation : @xmath165 = 0.005 ( 100,110)(5,0 ) ( 10,5 ) ( 5,95)(0,0)@xmath152 ( 5,50)(0,0)@xmath126 ( 90,2)(0,0)@xmath160 kww relaxation is also achieved with the complete set of equations ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1]-[eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) . at time @xmath91 , @xmath166 , and no constraint is applied until time @xmath92 : @xmath140 ) = 0 $ ] . during the ramp , the deformation of the material is essentially elastic , no rearrangement occurs , hence , @xmath167 , while the imposed strain determines the initial value the stress : @xmath142 . during the ensuing relaxation , @xmath100 and , for a small deformation , @xmath168 . it results that , at all times , the quantity @xmath169 is constant : @xmath170 here , @xmath171 , but this expression may vary , depending on the preparation of a sample . to treat initial values of @xmath2 and @xmath64 in the greatest generality , the initial value for the difference @xmath172 is denoted @xmath173 ( and here , @xmath174 ) . at long times , the dynamics of @xmath64 and @xmath2 verify , @xmath175\left(\sigma-\delta\right)\\ & \simeq & -\left(\mu+{1\over\epsilon_0}\right ) \,e_0\,\left({e_1\,t\over\kappa}\right)^{-1/\kappa}\left(\sigma-\delta\right)\end{aligned}\ ] ] whence , @xmath176\ ] ] with , @xmath177 the evolution in time of the quantity @xmath172 is governed by the same equation as the dynamics of @xmath2 in the isotropic limit . therefore , all the previous discussion presented in the isotropic limit pertains to the general case , up to a constant term , which is fixed by the conservation of the quantity @xmath169 . the dynamics of @xmath64 and @xmath2 follow . in particular , the evolution of @xmath64 reads , @xmath178\over 1+\mu\epsilon_0 } \quad,\ ] ] and the relaxation modulus verifies , @xmath179\over 1+\mu\epsilon_0 } \quad.\ ] ] the isotropic expression for @xmath180 is recovered by taking @xmath181 . note that the relaxation of the stress could lead to a negative value if @xmath182 , which depends on the preparation of the sample . for @xmath116 ( _ i.e. _ @xmath115 ) , the stress undergoes a kww relaxation towards a non - vanishing value , which depends on the properties of the material and on the preparation of the sample . for @xmath123 power law relaxation is observed towards a non - vanishing value of the stress . in the current work , two origins are therefore identified for the existence of a non - vanishing stress at long times : the creation of mechanical anisotropy of the contact network ( jamming ) , or the existence of a ergodic to non - ergodic transition for the hopping motion in phase space ( freezing ) . recent observations by bonn _ et al _ indicate that for a given material , jamming could not be identified only to a loss of ergodicity , and that some amount of jamming could coexist with liquid - like behavior . @xcite such features are allowed in the current theory and show the importance of the stz mechanism for soft glassy materials . the validity of the linear approximation is checked by considering the long times relaxation of the rate of plastic deformation : @xmath183\ ] ] and the work of plastic deformation decays like @xmath13 since @xmath2 goes to a constant ; the non - linear term in equation ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) is negligible at all times . when a constant strain rate @xmath184 is applied , the material is driven strongly out - of - equilibrium ; the response of the system involves non - linear terms . i study here the stationary states of a sheared material , in which , @xmath185 . in the first sections , i make a very primitive stability analysis of those stationary states , by assuming that @xmath185 is fixed at all times , and that the stress is given by the constitutive relation ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1 ] ) or ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1 ] ) ; this allows to decouple equation ( [ eqn : sigma:0 ] ) . the existence of an unstability in the complete set of equations accounts for the emergence of stick - slip motion in boundary lubrication . @xcite this question will be briefly discussed in section [ sec : hopf ] , but raises so many issues that it will be tackled thoroughly in another publication ; for the sake of completeness , the calculation of the hopf criterion is given in appendix [ app : hopf ] . in the limit @xmath186 ( no yield stress ) , the relation between shear rate and shear stress reads ( from ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1 ] ) ) : @xmath187 \quad.\ ] ] eliminating @xmath2 between equations ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1 ] ) and ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:2 ] ) , yields : @xmath188 + \alpha { \dot\epsilon^2\over e_0}\ , \exp\left[{1\over\chi}\right ] \label{eqn : chidyn}\ ] ] which is positive iff , @xmath189 in the stationary flow , the relation between shear strain and volume reads , @xmath190 \quad.\ ] ] for future use , i introduce the critical rate of deformation , @xmath191 = 0.005 ( 110,60)(8,-8 ) ( 13,40)(0,0)@xmath192 ( 10,48)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 85,-13)(0,0)@xmath20 ( 10,-13 ) the bifurcation diagram for @xmath20 is presented figure [ fig : vf ] . if @xmath193 , then @xmath194 at all times : free - volume diverges , the system blows up . if @xmath195 , the equation for @xmath20 admits one solution : @xmath196 the existence of a stationary value for the free - volume indicates that for any finite rate of deformation , aging stops . in fact , this is not completely exact if a vanishingly small shear rate was applied , such that the associated steady free - volume is so small , that it is not accessible at reasonable timescales . as a consequence , for very small @xmath13 , the apparent viscosity saturates to a constant value this is a common feature of complex liquids ( see _ e.g. _ @xcite ) . in the steady state the value of the shear stress is , @xmath197 with , @xmath198 the system behaves like a power law fluid ; the exponent @xmath199 of the power law viscosity is related to the exponent @xmath111 of kww relaxation by , @xmath200 those two exponents are directly related to the slope @xmath65 of @xmath152 as a function of @xmath201 . the assumptions underlying the current approach do not permit to evaluate the activation volumes associated with density relaxation and shear motion . however , the single parameter @xmath65 determines two exponents associated with the linear and non - linear response of a strained material . the existence of such a relation constitutes a important result of the current theory , although the form given to this relation depends on non - generic features : how non - linear dilatancy is introduced in the equation of motion for free - volume ; how the update frequencies ( here taken constant ) are written . in a hard - sphere material , for example , collision frequencies depend on free - volume as @xmath152 , and the relation between @xmath2 and @xmath184 is expected to be modified by logarithmic corrections . molecular dynamics simulations of sheared fluid are consistent with power law rheologies for @xmath199 equal to 0.1 @xcite or 0.2 @xcite recent measurement of power law rheology have also been obtained on a colloidal glass , leading to values of @xmath199 ranging from 0.1 to 0.35 . @xcite a value of @xmath111 of order @xmath202 corresponds to @xmath203 , which seems in reasonable agreement with the currently available data . the theory of structural rearrangement described here , is expected to present some degree of universality , and hold , in a given form , for wide classes of materials . what this model shows is that there is an intimate relation between time - logarithmic density relaxation , kww relaxation , and power law rheology of a dense material , and that this relation may depend only on generic features for a given class of materials . therefore the existence of a relation between @xmath111 and @xmath199 could be tested by considering families of materials . the experimental or numerical evaluation of such a relation appears as an important mean of characterization of the coupling between two major modes of deformation . the constitutive equations are now ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1]-[eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) . in the steady state , @xmath204 plugging expression ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1 ] ) for the plastic deformation in equation ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) leads to the following relation between @xmath20 and @xmath2 in the steady state : @xmath205 = e_0e_1(^2 - 1_0 ) . @xmath205 using ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) again , @xmath184 can then be written as a function of @xmath2 : @xmath206 for large @xmath2 or @xmath184 , the system behaves as a power law fluid , with the same exponent @xmath199 as in the isotropic limit . however , @xmath184 vanishes for a non - zero value of @xmath2 , which determines the yield stress : @xmath207 the following expression can also be obtained for @xmath184 as a function of @xmath20 : @xmath208 \over \sqrt{\alpha}\ ; \sqrt{e_0\alpha\,\exp\left[{\kappa/\chi}\right ] + e_1\mu_0\,\exp\left[{1/\chi}\right ] } } \quad,\ ] ] which is an increasing function of @xmath20 , and which has a maximum for @xmath209 : @xmath210 for @xmath211 , like in the isotropic case , the shear deformation leads to a constant increase of free - volume , and the system blows up . when a shear rate is suddenly imposed on a material , the transient dynamics often lead to a first rise of the stress before a dynamical yield stress is reached at which plastic deformations begin ; once plastic deformation occur , the stress relaxes towards its strain - rate dependent asymptotic value . @xcite these features are observed in sheared bulk solids @xcite but also in sheared thin films , @xcite granular materials @xcite or in solid friction . @xcite another generic property of transient regimes is that the dynamical yield stress depends on the age of the material : during aging , a material strengthens . these phenomena are captured by the proposed equations . strain softening and strengthening result essentially from the equation of motion for free - volume and are captured by the isotropic equations . figure [ fig : bump ] present some examples of transient dynamics obtained by numerical integration of equations ( [ eqn : sigma:0 ] ) , ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1]-[eqn : stzdil : iso:2 ] ) . parameters are set to @xmath212 . the initial value for the free - volume ( at time @xmath91 ) is set to @xmath213 , and the system relaxes without forcing during a time @xmath92 . at time @xmath92 , a constant strain rate is applied . to prevent the blow - up of the system , @xmath184 must be smaller than @xmath192 , which equals @xmath214 with the chosen parameters ; for this reason , the strain rate is set to @xmath215 . two different values of the parameter @xmath65 have been used to explore the two important cases when @xmath65 is larger or smaller than 1 . the stress is displayed as a function of the total time @xmath102 since preparation of the sample . = 0.005 ( 100,110)(5,0 ) ( 10,5 ) ( 5,95)(0,0)@xmath152 ( 5,50)(0,0)@xmath2 ( 90,2)(0,0)@xmath102 a dynamical yield stress clearly emerges for a sufficiently aged material , and increases with time . the yielding of the material is accompanied by a sudden rise of the free - volume allowing transformation rates to display non - vanishing values . these transients result from a rather complex interplay between the dynamics of free - volume and shear transformation . the complete study of this process may lead to many developments that would divert this work from the main questions that i would like to address , and i prefer to leave the discussion here . the stability analysis of equations ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1]-[eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) and ( [ eqn : sigma:0 ] ) shows the existence of a hopf bifurcation which is responsible for oscillatory response to a given strain rate . this leads to some understanding of stick - slip motion in sheared lubricants @xcite or in granular materials . @xcite in this work , i mention this instability for the sake of completeness , but it raises many questions , and will require a more thorough consideration . the calculation of the hopf criterion of bifurcation is given in appendix [ app : hopf ] . in the isotropic limit , the steady plastic deformation is stable iff @xmath216 , with : @xmath217 ^ 2 \quad.\ ] ] for @xmath115 , @xmath218 : there is no hopf bifurcation . for @xmath117 , @xmath219 on the interval @xmath220 $ ] , and the steady state becomes unstable iff @xmath221 . this criterion is represented figure [ fig : hopf : iso ] . for driving strain rates above @xmath192 , the system looses stability , because there is no stationary solution for @xmath20 . below @xmath192 , the hopf criterion separates a domain of stability , above @xmath222 where the system reaches steady plastic deformation , and and domain below this curve where stick - slip motion is achieved . = 0.005 ( 110,60)(8,-8 ) ( 6,40)(0,0)@xmath222 ( 68,-13)(0,0)@xmath192 ( 85,-13)(0,0)@xmath184 ( 10,-13 ) the introduction of the variable @xmath64 in the set of equations ( [ eqn : sigma:0 ] ) , ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1]-[eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) slightly modifies this picture ( see appendix [ app : hopf ] ) . two limit curves @xmath223 emerge , which delimit the unstable domain in the plane @xmath224 . these curves are displayed figure [ fig : hopf : lin ] along with the previous curves @xmath222 of the isotropic limit . the unstable domain is a subspace of what it is in the isotropic limit , and the system present a creeping zone , close to @xmath99 , when steady sliding is stable for very small values of the strain rate . = 0.005 ( 90,90)(0,0 ) ( 10,5 ) ( 5,75)(0,0)@xmath144 ( 70,2)(0,0)@xmath184 some examples of stick - slip motion are displayed figure [ fig : stickslip ] , with the set of parameters used in the phase diagram of figure [ fig : hopf : lin ] : @xmath225 , and @xmath226 in the isotropic limit ( solid lines ) and @xmath227 for the complete set of equations ( dashed lines ) . the fast bursts of plastic deformation are accompanied by sudden jumps in the free - volume . @xmath64 does not play a major role for the definition of the dynamical yield stress , as seen from the almost identical values of the maximum stress ; @xmath64 , however , strongly influences smaller values of the stress as it shifts upwards the unstable fixed point ; this also modifies the periodicity of stick - slip motion . = 0.005 ( 100,110)(5,0 ) ( 10,5 ) ( 5,95)(0,0)@xmath152 ( 5,50)(0,0)@xmath2 ( 90,2)(0,0)@xmath102 in a creep test , a material is tested by forcing a constant stress . since @xmath2 is constant , the elastic deformation is @xmath228 at all times , and the plastic deformation is determined by the constitutive equations . a small constant stress @xmath2 is applied at time @xmath229 . the plastic deformation of the material is determined by equations ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1]-[eqn : stzdil : iso:2 ] ) , for a fixed @xmath2 . at large times , the rate of plastic deformation reads @xmath230 this lead to a power law variation of the compliance , @xmath231 : @xmath232 if @xmath115 , or @xmath116 , the compliance diverges at long times ; if @xmath117 , or @xmath123 , the compliance saturates at long times : @xmath233 the system jams . this jamming is purely entropic , and does not result from a structural anisotropy of the force network . note that the asymptotic value of the compliance decays with the increasing age of the sample . the validity of the linear approximation must be checked by considering the evolution of the work of plastic deformation : @xmath234 the linear approximation is justified so long as this term is negligible , when compared to the first term in free - volume relaxation ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:2 ] ) , which decays as @xmath235 . when @xmath117 , the work @xmath45 decays faster than @xmath235 , and therefore , the linear approximation is valid at all times ; when @xmath115 , however , this approximation fails when : @xmath236 or , @xmath237 the time @xmath238 is a typical time after which the linear approximation fails ; this time diverges when @xmath239 . it will appear clearer in the following that , when @xmath115 , free - volume presents a non - vanishing stationary value for any small applied stress . this asymptotic value is determined by the balance between density relaxation and shear induced dilatancy . the failure of the linear approximation , for @xmath115 , is due to the existence of a non - zero stationary value of @xmath20 for any applied stress . in the general case , the constitutive equations are ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1]-[eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) . the constant applied stress deforms the material elastically , and at time @xmath240 , no plastic rearrangement has yet occurred . note that the initial value of the state variable @xmath64 depends on the preparation of the sample . in the experiments by cloitre _ et al _ , for example , the sample is prepared by applying a strong shear stress , above the yield stress during a rather long time . @xcite in this case , the initial value of @xmath64 is expected to be non - vanishing , and this leads to their observation of strain recovery . for the sake of generality , i will consider that the initial value of @xmath64 is non - vanishing : @xmath241 . in this section , i will assume that this value of @xmath64 is small enough so that the linear approximation is still valid . when plastic rearrangements occur in the material , they induce a structuration of the material , and the variable @xmath64 starts to evolve as @xmath168 . the plastic rate of deformation evolves as , @xmath242 and @xmath64 as , @xmath243 from this equation , the relaxation of the variable @xmath172 is easily obtained : @xmath244 \quad,\ ] ] with @xmath245 when @xmath115 , @xmath172 undergoes a kww relaxation towards 0 : the material relaxes towards a jammed state in which the stress is supported by structural anisotropy . when @xmath117 , @xmath172 saturates to a non - vanishing value : at long times , a fraction of the stress is supported by the bias between arrangements , measured by @xmath64 , but another fraction is supported by the loss of ergodicity resulting from the freezing of elementary shear processes . from equation @xmath168 , the compliance reads , @xmath246 ) \quad.\ ] ] the deformation relaxes to a constant value , which depends on the preparation of the sample ; the relaxation is either a kww or a power law relaxation depending on @xmath65 . note that the power law variation of the compliance that was found in the isotropic limit is recovered when @xmath247 ; for finite @xmath248 , this power law behavior shows up at short times , when @xmath64 is still far from saturation . in this section i start by considering the complete set of equations ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1]-[eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) , and in particular , i recall how the dynamics of @xmath64 lead to jamming . then i show how this leads to an effective equation for free - volume which is valid in the isotropic limit or in the general case . a constant stress @xmath2 is applied . the dynamics of @xmath64 is governed by the following equation : @xmath249\ , \left(\sigma-\delta\right)\;\left(1-\mu_0\,\sigma\,\delta\right ) \quad . \label{eqn : deltadyn}\ ] ] since the normalized free - volume @xmath20 enters this equation only through a positive factor , the time - dependent value of @xmath20 does not change the stability analysis performed at any fixed free - volume . the bifurcation diagram for @xmath64 is drawn figure [ fig : delta ] . = 0.005 ( 110,60)(8,-8 ) ( 12,40)(0,0)@xmath64 ( 85,-13)(0,0)@xmath2 ( 10,-13 ) the dynamics of the variable @xmath64 leads to jamming for any stress smaller than the yield stress @xcite @xmath250 in which case , @xmath251 and @xmath99 . above the yield stress , the steady shear flow becomes a stable solution , in which case , @xmath252 and @xmath253\,\left(\sigma-{1\over\mu_0\,\sigma}\right ) \quad . \label{eqn : eps : creep}\ ] ] if @xmath254 , the systems jams , and the second term in the equation of motion for the free - volume vanishes . free - volume continues to relax logarithmically in time while the system does not deform . when @xmath255 , the system presents a non - zero plastic flow , and the evolution of free - volume is governed by the following asymptotic equation : @xmath188 + \alpha { e_0}\,\exp\left[-{1\over\chi}\right]\,\left(\sigma^2-{1\over\mu_0}\right ) \quad . \label{eqn : chi : creep}\ ] ] at the level of this equation , the jamming resulting from stz s shows up only through the term @xmath89 in equation ( [ eqn : chi : creep ] ) , which shifts the square of the applied stress . the stability analysis pertains essentially to the isotropic limit . from this point on , i will consider the response to a constant stress as governed by equations ( [ eqn : eps : creep ] ) and ( [ eqn : chi : creep ] ) ( which amounts to neglect the influence of @xmath64 during transients ) . i now study the free - volume dynamics which result from equation ( [ eqn : chi : creep ] ) . the material dilates iff @xmath256 , with : @xmath257}\ ] ] and contracts otherwise . the resulting bifurcation diagram for @xmath20 is drawn figure [ fig : chi:1 ] and [ fig : chi:2 ] for @xmath115 and @xmath117 respectively . for @xmath115 , free - volume dynamics admit a stationary solution for any @xmath258 $ ] , with , @xmath259 for values of the applied stress in the interval @xmath260 $ ] , the material undergoes steady plastic deformation : it is ductile . the shear deformation reads , @xmath261 and the strain rate behaves as a power of the stress for large stresses . when the applied stress varies in the interval , @xmath258 $ ] , the strain rate can display a whole interval of values @xmath262 \quad.\ ] ] for larger values of @xmath2 , above @xmath263 , free - volume diverges , leading to the break - up of the material . = 0.005 ( 110,60)(8,-8 ) ( 10,48)(0,0)@xmath2 ( 13,40)(0,0)@xmath263 ( 13,-1)(0,0)@xmath264 ( 85,-13)(0,0)@xmath20 ( 10,-13 ) the resulting dynamics for the compliance and for the free - volume are presented figure [ fig : compl : soft ] for different values of the driving stress @xmath2 . the first part of the dynamics is determined by the initial value of free - volume and the corresponding timescale . as easily seen on the bifurcation diagram ( [ fig : chi:1 ] ) , for small stresses , an initially large free - volume decays , and slows down the plastic deformation . this results in a plateau for the dynamics of the compliance ; a larger times , free - volume converges towards a constant value , and the dynamics of @xmath265 resumes a steady increase . these curves are to compare with measurements of particle diffusion : the particle diffusion in a dense material is expected to be dominated by collective processes ; the diffusive constant is then @xmath266 $ ] , and the average motion of a particle in a glassy medium is essentially governed by the same equation as @xmath265 . the features displayed of figure [ fig : compl : soft ] are amazingly similar to the curves found in several recent experiments . @xcite = 0.005 ( 100,110)(5,0 ) ( 10,5 ) ( 5,95)(0,0)@xmath152 ( 5,50)(0,0)@xmath267 ( 90,2)(0,0)@xmath153 if free - volume diverges , just before break - up , the current equations indicate that the strain rate should display a behavior of the form , @xmath268 however , this expression must be taken with caution , since the strongly out - of - equilibrium behavior of a material during break - up , when @xmath20 is large , is beyond the scope of the current theory . in particular , assumption has been made that the distribution of voids is close to an equilibrium state . during break - up , the distribution of free - volume is expected to display strong heterogeneities leading to the nucleation of fractures . for @xmath117 , and for any @xmath269 , @xmath270 : free - volume relaxes to 0 . in this case , the applied stress does not stop aging , shear deformation is vanishingly small : the material creeps . at long time , the linear term dominates free - volume relaxation : the calculation of linear response that has been presented in section [ sec : lin : iso ] is valid , and indicates that compliance saturates : the system jams . in general , part of this jamming is supported by the structuration of the material , which lowers the value of the stress that enters equation ( [ eqn : chi : creep ] ) ; the remaining stress is supported by entropic freezing of the rearrangement dynamics . the sign of free - volume relaxation can be inverted only for larger stresses , above @xmath271 ; it this case , the response depends sensitively on the value of @xmath2 and on the state of the material at the time @xmath92 when stress is applied : a larger stress is required to break an older material . the stationary state is unstable : when @xmath2 is large enough to invert the sign of free - volume dynamics , the material breaks up . in this case , there are two types of response : creep for low stress , and break - up for large values of the stress . the material is brittle . = 0.005 ( 110,60)(8,-8 ) ( 10,40)(0,0)@xmath2 ( 13,20)(0,0)@xmath263 ( 85,-13)(0,0)@xmath20 ( 10,-13 ) the resulting dynamics for free - volume and for the compliance are displayed figure [ fig : compl : hard ] . the saturation of the compliance is clearly seen for small stresses while the divergence occurs at a value at @xmath272 . the shape of these curves changes drastically in a very small interval of @xmath2 around @xmath271 because of long transient to escape from the unstable fixed point . these features are commonly observed in creep tests . @xcite = 0.005 ( 100,110)(5,0 ) ( 10,5 ) ( 5,95)(0,0)@xmath152 ( 5,50)(0,0)@xmath265 ( 90,2)(0,0)@xmath102 materials with @xmath115 are liable to display ductile behavior , but can break ; those with @xmath117 either creep or break - up , and could be classified as unconditionally brittle . the study of stz equations one a one - dimensional elasto - plastic decohesion has shown the importance of dynamics in ductile to brittle transition . @xcite the current analysis slightly contradicts those results , and indicates that two major types of materials can be identified , which display different qualitative behavior : this is in agreement with the common idea that some materials are ductile , some other brittle . in fact , for hard materials ( @xmath117 ) , the existence of a strong entropic crisis precludes dynamics of rearrangements to come into play : intrinsic properties of the material completely dominate the dynamical process of deformation . the existence of a dynamically driven transition between ductile and brittle behavior is still expected for soft materials ( @xmath115 ) for which the dynamics or arrangements can fully play its role . the interplay between dynamics and intrinsic glassy properties of material , as displayed in the current approach , seems a promising perspective . as far as fracture mechanics is concerned , this picture indicates that during the breaking of a hard glass , the motion of molecules in a material should be essentially localized around the surface of a crack , where there is some free - volume , whereas in the bulk , plastic deformation can occur only in places where a very large stress in concentrated . this is apparently related to a theoretical approach of fracture mechanics , recently introduced by brener and spatschek , @xcite where the dynamics of the fracture is controlled by diffusion of molecules along the surface . for soft glassy materials , on the contrary , the propagation of a fracture is expected to induce more easily observable plastic deformation in the bulk of the material . the current work relies on the introduction of dynamical equations for the intensive quantity associated with entropic fluctuations of molecular configurations . in this work , this quantity is identified to free - volume , but other physical pictures could be given . for example , free - volume is related to the average number of contacts per molecule ; in a foam , the deformation of the bubbles can be accounted for a effective free - volume that is determined by the packing of effective overlapping particles as those used in the simulations by durian , @xcite even though the relative proportions of a fluid mixture is kept constant ; in a colloidal suspension , the existence of electrostatic screening contributes to an effective size of the particle that depends on the packing structure . in fact , the assumption made in this work is rather general , and many situation can be expected to lead to a dynamically driven effective free - volume ; this may explain the ubiquity of glassy behavior . the theoretical approach to glassy materials can be summarized as : how ergodicity breaks ? or what ergodicity breaking is sufficient to account for slow modes of relaxation . the introduction of a whole distribution of timescales is a very general way to account for non - ergodicity . here i assume that a much weaker ergodicity breaking is sufficient , and this is directly supported by the observation that fluctuation - dissipation theorem holds in a weak ( but , not so weak ) form . this indicates that the underlying distributions of state variables should not ( in fact ) be too weird , and that an effective width accounts for its essential features . however , since the system is out - of - equilibrium , this width must , at least , become a dynamical quantity . the equation proposed appear as a very minimal first order closure of the dynamics of an underlying distribution of voids . the set of curves displayed in figure [ fig : relax3 ] is very reminiscent of the temperature dependency of relaxation spectra . @xcite obviously , the parameters of the theory should depend on temperature and other thermodynamical parameters , but here i purposely do not intend to address this question . there are ( at least ) two reasons for that : firstly , because glassy behavior is observed in many systems , in particular in suspensions or in granular materials , where thermodynamical temperature is not a relevant parameter . secondly , because it seems to me more interesting to extract all possible conclusions from the simple equations proposed without trying to incorporate them into a more specific setup . i do think that an effective dynamically driven free - volume should emerge from microscopic dynamics under minimal assumptions . therefore , it seems to me important to try to get some fundamental understanding of the consequences of such assumptions for a fixed set of parameters , without complicating the discussion . the dependency of the parameters of this theory on thermodynamic quantities is definitely an important issue to address in the future , but it first requires to have some intuition about the outcome of those equations . this work is intended to provide a grid of possible behavior displayed by simple equations , and i hope it can be helpful for further developments . finally , one major interest of the current work is , in my opinion , that is gives a unified picture where different mechanisms for jamming coexist . this coexistence of jamming with non - linear rheology has been observed experimentally , but could not be captured by earlier model of glassy rheology . moreover , it opens the way towards a description of glassy materials where thermodynamics ( that determine the parameters of constitutive equations ) and dynamics coexists . this work has primarily benefited from the support and encouragements of jean carlson and jim langer who received me among their people in the busy heights of ucsb ; i acknowledge the opportunity they gave me to pursue my ideas , and their continuous interest for my work . i have enjoyed useful discussions with them , and also with others : ralph archuleta , pascal favreau , anthony foglia , delphine gourdon , jacob israelachvili , daniel lavalle , jean - christophe nave . i also would like to thank daniel bonn for giving me early versions of his papers , which were helpful in the writing of this manuscript . this work was supported by the w. m. keck foundation , and the nsf grant no . dmr-9813752 , and epri / dod through the program on interactive complex networks . the system ( [ eqn : sigma:0 ] ) , ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:1 ] ) , ( [ eqn : stzdil : iso:2 ] ) reduces to two equations for @xmath2 and @xmath20 , @xmath274\sigma\\ \dot\chi & = & -e_1 \exp\left[-{\kappa\over\chi}\right ] + \alpha\,e_0\,\exp\left[-{1\over\chi}\right]\,\sigma^2\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the jacobian of this dynamical system reads : @xmath275 ^ 2\cr 2\,e_0\,\alpha\,\sigma\,\phi & \left(-\kappa\,e_1\phi^\kappa + e_0\,\alpha \,{\sigma } ^2\,\phi\right)\log[\phi]^2\cr } \right ) \quad.\ ] ] in the steady state , the variable @xmath2 verifies , @xmath276 and @xmath277 takes on the value , @xmath278 for all @xmath279 , @xmath280 is a strictly increasing function of @xmath184 . in terms of @xmath281 , the eigenvalues @xmath282 of the jacobian verify : @xmath283 ^ 2 \right ) & + & \\ { \mu\,e_0\,e_1\,(\kappa+1)}\;\phi_{\rm s}^{\kappa+1}\,\ln\left[\phi_{\rm s}\right]^2 & = & 0 \quad,\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the hopf bifurcation is determined by a critical value of @xmath144 as a function of @xmath280 : @xmath284 ^ 2\ ] ] or , @xmath217 ^ 2 \quad.\ ] ] in the general case , the system ( [ eqn : sigma:0 ] ) , ( [ eqn : stzdil : lin:1]-[eqn : stzdil : lin:3 ] ) involves one additional variable ( @xmath64 ) , and the bifurcation analysis is somewhat more complicated . in the steady state , the relation between strain rate and free - volume can be rewritten as , @xmath285 since this expression is an strictly increasing function of @xmath277 , it is possible to carry out the analysis in terms of @xmath286 as an effective parameter . when the strain rate varies between @xmath287 and @xmath192 , @xmath277 varies on the interval @xmath288 $ ] . the values above @xmath214 are meaningless because there is no solution to the equations of motion . the hopf criterion can be written in the form , @xmath289 with : @xmath290 the quantity @xmath291 has the opposite sign of the real part of the complex eigenvalues of the jacobian : the steady state is stable , iff @xmath292 . for @xmath115 , and for any @xmath293 $ ] , @xmath294 is positive : the two values of @xmath144 , solutions of @xmath295 have the same sign . this sign can change only at a point where @xmath294 vanishes , that is @xmath296 or @xmath214 . the sign shared by these solutions on the interval @xmath293 $ ] can then be evaluated by taking the limit value of the coefficient @xmath297 close to 0 or 1 : it is positive . therefore , the equation @xmath295 has no real positive solution for @xmath115 : there is no hopf instability . it can be checked that there is no other instability , therefore , for @xmath115 , the system is stable . i am now considering the case when @xmath117 . to get a first idea of the phase diagram , in the parameter space @xmath298 , the quantity @xmath291 can be evaluated on the line @xmath299 : @xmath300 . on this line , the positiveness of @xmath291 is then equivalent to , @xmath301 which requires that : @xmath302 \quad.\ ] ] for @xmath303 the coefficient @xmath294 is negative , hence , equation @xmath295 has a single positive solution . on the interval @xmath304 $ ] this equation admits two solutions which are positive because @xmath297 is negative close to @xmath296 : the solution @xmath305 which vanishes at the point @xmath306 and the solution @xmath307 which exists on the whole interval @xmath288 $ ] . the unstability occurs for @xmath308 $ ] . at small shear rates , or small @xmath277 , the criterion @xmath291 is dominated by : @xmath309 whence , @xmath310 the solution @xmath307 can then be identified to : @xmath311 close to @xmath296 . the same expression was found in the isotropic limit , but here , the relation between @xmath277 and the shear rate , @xmath184 is different . the solution @xmath305 can be expanded as , @xmath312 Abstract:
[ "typical properties of glassy materials are shown to be captured by a mean - field free - volume theory . relaxation processes are supposed to be free - volume activated , and different entropy barriers are associated with density relaxation and shear motion . free - volume time logarithmic relaxation , kohlrausch - williams - watts , and power law viscosity result from the non - linear dynamics of spatially averaged quantities . the exponents associated with these phenomena are related to a single parameter of the theory . the theory also accounts for coexistence of jamming transitions and non - linear rheology ." ]
14,142
14,142
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: barely fifteen years after the invention of the laboratory maser in 1953 which required a population inversion in the ammonia molecule to be carefully _ engineered _ interstellar masers were _ discovered _ as a remarkable and naturally - occurring phenomenon . the @xmath3 transition of water vapor , with a frequency near 22 ghz , was among the first masing transitions detected from an astrophysical source ( the orion molecular cloud ; cheung et al . 1969 ) , and has proven to be an extraordinarily useful probe in environments as diverse as interstellar shock waves , circumnuclear gas in active galactic nuclei ( agn ) , and the envelopes of evolved stars ( elitzur 1992 ; lo 2005 ; and references therein ) . with brightness temperatures that often exceed @xmath5 k and in extreme cases can exceed @xmath6 k ( e.g. garay , moran & haschick ( 1989 ) , and with linewidths that are often extremely narrow , 22 ghz water masers can be observed with very long baseline interferometry ( vlbi ) . the very high angular resolution of such vlbi observations enables proper motion studies of the kinematics of gas outflowing from proto- and evolved stars . moreover , trigonometric and geometric / rotational parallaxes can be determined , yielding the distances and motions of star forming regions in our galaxy , in local group galaxies , and in more distant agn ( e.g. brunthaler et al . 2007 ; braatz et al . such observations have led to revised estimates of the size , shape and kinematics of the milky way ( e.g. reid et al . 2009 ) , as well as the best evidence yet obtained for the existence of supermassive black holes ( e.g. miyoshi et al . 1995 ) . masers directly probe extreme environments ( of density and temperature ) , whose properties can often only be inferred indirectly from other lines . over the 40 years since the first detection of interstellar water maser emission in the 22 ghz transition , several additional interstellar maser transitions have been detected at higher frequencies , some in response to a specific prediction of a population inversion ( menten et al . 1990a ) . in the case of pure rotational emissions , these comprise the 183 ghz ( waters et al . 1980 ) , 321 ghz ( menten et al . 1990b ) , 325 ghz ( menten et al . 1990a ) , 380 ghz ( phillips et al . 1980 ) , 439 ghz ( melnick et al . 1993 ) and 471 ghz ( melnick et al . 1993 ) lines , associated respectively with the @xmath7 , @xmath8 , @xmath9 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 , and @xmath12 transitions . these transitions are shown in the energy level diagram in figure 1 . in addition , several water transitions within the the @xmath131 and 2 vibrationally - excited states have been observed toward the circumstellar envelopes of evolved stars , as have the 437 ghz @xmath14 and 475 ghz 5@xmath15 pure rotational transitions ( melnick et al . 1993 ; menten et al . 2008 ) . the detection of multiple masing transitions has been crucial in elucidating the pumping mechanism responsible for the population inversions and the physical conditions in the masing gas . understanding the latter , of course , is crucial to the astrophysical interpretation of maser observations . while the interpretation of the emission observed in a single line ( e.g. the 22 ghz transition ) is very geometry dependent , because the non - linear amplification of the radiation strongly favors those sight - lines that happen to possess the greatest velocity coherence , the interpretation of multiline observations is more robust and permits important constraints to be placed upon ( 1 ) the excitation mechanism and ( 2 ) the conditions of temperature and density in the emitting gas . the pattern of pure rotational maser transitions observed from interstellar sources appears to confirm an excitation model ( e.g. neufeld & melnick 1991 ) in which collisional pumping , combined with spontaneous radiative decay , leads to the inversion of exactly those transitions that are observed to mase . in evolved stars , however , the additional presence of the 437 ghz @xmath14 maser transition suggests that collisional pumping is not the entire story and that radiative pumping by dust continuum radiation is also important . quantitative measurements of maser line ratios provide additional constraints . for example , the predicted dependence of a maser line ratio upon the temperature and density of the masing gas was used by melnick et al . ( 1993 ) to derive a lower limit of 1000 k upon the gas temperature in several observed sources ; this value argued against a model ( elitzur , hollenbach & mckee 1989 ) in which the masers were excited in 400 k material behind a dissociative shock wave , and favored a model ( kaufman & neufeld 1996 ) in which non - dissociative magnetohydrodynamic shocks were the source of the emission . the analysis makes the assumption that the maser beam angle is similar for the two transitions that are being compared . prior to the launch of the _ herschel space observatory _ ( pilbratt et al . 2010 ) , the observational data on pure rotational water masers had been limited to transitions of frequency less than 500 ghz , largely because of atmospheric absorption . the hifi spectrometer on _ herschel _ ( de grauuw et al . 2010 ) , however , provides the opportunity of expanding the available data set by the addition of higher frequency transitions that promise to increase our leverage on the pumping mechanism and the physical conditions in the maser - emitting gas . to date , _ herschel _ observations of oxygen - rich evolved stars have led to the detection of two additional water maser transitions : ( 1 ) the @xmath0 transition at 620.701 ghz ( detected toward vy cma by harwit et al . 2010 , and toward w hya , ik tau and irc+10011 by justtanont et al . 2012 ) ; and ( 2 ) the @xmath16 transition at 970.315 ghz ( detected toward w hya and ik tau by justtanont et al . to our knowledge , neither maser has previously been observed from interstellar gas . in this paper , we report the first detection of 621 ghz water maser emission from _ interstellar _ gas , obtained with _ herschel_/hifi in mapping observations of the orion - kl region . in addition , we report the detection of 621 ghz water maser emission obtained serendipitously in single pointings toward the w49n star - forming region and the orion south molecular cloud . our _ herschel _ observations of orion - kl were carried out on 2011 march 11 as part of the `` orion small maps '' subprogram within the hexos guaranteed time key program ( gtkp ; p.i . , e. bergin ) . we used the `` heterodyne instrument for the infrared '' ( hifi ) , in `` on - the - fly mapping '' ( otf ) mode , to obtain a nyquist - sampled map consisting of a 6 by 8 rectangular array of pointings spaced by @xmath17 in r.a . and the map center was located at offset ( @xmath18 relative to orion - kl . ( all offsets given in this paper are relative to @xmath19 ( j2000 ) , the position we adopt for orion - kl . ) the reference position for the otf mapping observations , at offset @xmath20 , was chosen to be devoid of known molecular emission . the observations were carried out in the upper sideband of mixer band 1b , using the wbs spectrometer , which provides an oversampled channel spacing of 0.5 mhz ( 0.27 km / s at a frequency of 621 ghz ) , roughly one - half the effective resolution . the absolute frequency calibration is accurate to 100 khz ( roefsema et al . the beam size was 34@xmath21 ( hpbw ) , and the absolute pointing accuracy is @xmath22 . two concatenated astronomical observation requests ( aors ) were used to obtain two separate maps , with a small relative offset ( @xmath23 ) chosen to make the center of the h polarization beam for one map coincident with the center of the v polarization beam for the other map . as discussed in 3 , the goal of acquiring two separate maps in this manner was to obtain a measurement of any linear polarization in the maser feature . as summarized in table 1 , the total duration of each aor was 1987 s , with an on - source integration time of 420 s , which yielded individual spectra with an r.m.s . noise of 62 mk ( on the scale of antenna temperature and for a 1.1 mhz channel width ) . the _ herschel _ data on orion - kl were reduced using standard methods in the herschel interactive processing environment ( hipe ; ott 2010 ) , version 10.0 on 2011 march 21 , ten days after the _ herschel _ observations of orion - kl were performed , we used the effelsberg 100 m telescope to carry out observations of the 22.23508 ghz @xmath3 transition , with the goal of determining the 621 ghz / 22 ghz line flux ratio as a constraint upon models for the maser emission mechanism . here , we obtained a map , centered at offset @xmath24 , consisting of a 9 by 9 square array of pointings spaced by @xmath25 in r.a . and the beam size was 41@xmath21 ( hpbw ) , and the frequency resolution was 6.1 khz , corresponding to a velocity resolution of 0.082 km / s . the observations were performed using the k - band receiver at the prime focus of the 100 m telescope , with an observing time of 1.0 min per position . in calibrating the spectra , we applied corrections for the atmospheric attenuation and for the dependence of the telescope gain on the elevation . the calibration factor was determined by the observation of suitable calibration sources like ngc7027 and 3c286 ( taking into account the significant linear polarization of the latter ) . in addition to the mapping observations of orion - kl that are the primary subject of this paper , we have also identified two additional _ spectra that show narrow and/or time variable 621 ghz features suggestive of maser action . our observations of high - mass star - forming region w49n were carried out at three separate epochs , as part of the prismas gtkp ( p.i , m. gerin ) . these observations had the primary goal of measuring foreground absorption in nearby spectral lines of @xmath26 , but included the 621 ghz line within the bandpass . for each epoch , the relevant data were acquired in 3 aors obtained with slightly different lo settings . the aor numbers , dates of observation , beam center position , duration of the observations , and rms noise achieved are listed in table 1 . the data reduction methods that we adopted within the prismas gtkp have been described , for example , by neufeld et al . our observations of the hot core in the orion south molecular cloud were performed as part of a spectral line survey in the hexos gtkp . the data of present interest were acquired in a full spectral scan of band 1b , in which the 621 ghz transition was observed ( in either the upper or the lower sideband ) at 19 separate lo settings . the data reduction methods that we adopted for spectral scans within the hexos gtkp have been described by bergin et al . ( 2010 ) , and further details of the observations appear in table 1 . ancillary 22 ghz maser observations were performed using the effelsberg 100 m telescope toward w49n and orion s on 2012 oct 1 and 2012 sep 28 , respectively . because water masers are well - known to exhibit significant variability on timescales of months , our comparison of these non - contemporaneous 22 ghz and 621 ghz spectra must be interpreted with caution ; indeed , as described in 3 below , time variability in the maser emission is readily inferred from a comparison of the w49n 621 ghz data acquired at the 3 epochs . in figure 2 , we show the 621 ghz @xmath0 line spectra obtained toward orion - kl . the spectra are autoscaled , with the color of each border indicating the vertical scaling in accordance with the color bars on the left , and the two linear polarizations are shown in separate panels . the lsr velocity range shown in each panel is 20 to + 30 km / s . analogous results are shown for the 22 ghz @xmath3 transition in figure 3 . clearly , the strongest 621 ghz line emission originates in the vicinity of orion - kl , and exhibits a broad profile characteristic of high - lying ( and non - masing ) rotational transitions of water observed by _ ( melnick et al . 2010 ) . however , to the northwest of orion - kl , close to the shocked material associated with orion h@xmath1 peak 1 ( beckwith et al . 1978 ) , a narrow emission feature is clearly present . this feature is most apparent in the four spectra obtained closest to offset @xmath27 , the average of which is shown in figure 4 ( e.g. upper panel , blue histogram ) . the 22 ghz maser emission , by contrast , is dominated by multiple narrow emission components , the strongest lying in the 7 to 13 km / s lsr velocity range ; see figure 4 ( upper panel , red histogram ) . in the lower panel of figure 4 , we compare the 621 ghz and 22 ghz line emissions observed in the vicinity of @xmath27 for the 9 to 14 km / s lsr velocity range . in this panel , the two polarizations are shown separately for each transition , and a broad emission component has been subtracted from the 621 ghz line profile . although the 621 ghz and 22 ghz spectra are dissimilar outside this velocity range the 22 ghz spectrum exhibiting a strong narrow feature near @xmath28 km / s that is absent in the 621 ghz spectrum , for example the spectra are very similar within the 10 13 km / s velocity range . and which are expected to account for more than @xmath29 of the observed emission , ) lie at frequency shifts of @xmath30 , @xmath31 and @xmath32 khz relative to the mean @xmath3 line frequency , corresponding to velocity shifts of @xmath33 , @xmath34 , and @xmath35 . thus , even if departures from lte lead to large changes in the hyperfine line ratios , the maximum resulting velocity shift is at most 0.5 km / s ; hyperfine splitting of the higher - frequency 621 ghz transitions is completely negligible . ] furthermore , for both lines , the spectra obtained in the two polarizations are very similar . given the systematic uncertainties ( associated , for example , with possible differences between the telescope beam profiles for the two polarizations ) , these data provide no compelling evidence for polarization . a more detailed study of polarization in this source , which makes use of additional observations obtained at multiple spacecraft roll angles to measure the linear polarization of the 621 ghz maser transition , is currently under way ( jones et al . 2013 , private communication ) the upper panel of figure 5 shows the 22 ghz spectrum obtained toward w49n ( red ) , along with the 621 ghz spectra obtained at three epochs spanning two years ( see table 1 ) . because the 621 ghz transition was not specifically targeted but rather observed serendipitously in observations with a different primary purpose , we did not perform near - contemporaneous 22 ghz observations . thus , the 22 ghz spectrum shown in figure 5 was acquired 170 days after the last 621 ghz observation , making a detailed comparison between the transitions difficult . on the other hand , the availability of 621 ghz line observations at three separate epochs has allowed us to detect unequivocal variability in the line profile . most notably , a narrow emission feature near @xmath36 km / s was present in the 2011 observation but absent in the 2010 and 2012 observations ; and the line profile in the @xmath37 km / s range shows clear variability throughout the period covered by the three epochs . this variability , which can result from small changes in the ( negative ) optical depth along the sight - line to the observer , is characteristic of high - gain maser emission from a turbulent medium . four interferometric studies provide information about the spatial distribution of the 22 ghz water maser emission in w49n over a 30-year time period ( moran et al . 1973 ; walker , matsakis , & garcia - barreto 1982 ; gwinn , moran & reid 1992 ; mcgrath , goss & de pree 2004 ; performed in 197071 , 1978 , 198082 , and 199899 , respectively ) . they indicate that 99% of the 22 ghz maser flux is associated with the ultracompact hii regions designated g1 and g2 ( dreher et al . 1984 ) , and originates within 5@xmath38 of the beam center position adopted for our _ herschel _ ( and effelsberg ) observations . the remainder of the observed 22 ghz maser emission originates from a region @xmath39 northeast of the beam center . given these offsets , the _ herschel _ beam size ( 34@xmath38 ) , and the absolute pointing accuracy ( 2@xmath38 ) , we find it very unlikely that the observed 621 ghz variability could be the result of pointing errors . the only way that pointing errors could falsely indicate variability is if a very strong 621 ghz maser emission feature were located in the far wing of the _ herschel _ beam profile ( where the beam response is a strong function of offset ) ; such an emission feature would lie outside the region from which 22 ghz emission has been detected in the interferometric studies discussed above . in the case of the 621 ghz spectra obtained toward w49n , the relative contribution of maser and non - maser emission is hard to disentangle , at least based on the data currently in hand . while it is tempting to interpret the spectra as a superposition of narrow maser features on top of a broad ( @xmath40 km / s wide ) plateau of thermal line emission , the 22 ghz spectrum has an entirely similar appearance . in the case of the 22 ghz transition , however , the expected contribution of thermal emission is negligible ; indeed , the interferometric studies referenced above show that the broad pedestal apparent in single - dish observations is - in reality - a superposition of numerous compact and narrow emission features within the beam . the lower panel of figure 5 shows the spectra obtained toward orion south in ( non - contemponeous ) observations of the 621 ghz and 22 ghz transitions . the 621 ghz spectrum shows a single prominent narrow feature of width @xmath41 km / s ( fwhm ) in near coincidence with one of three narrow 22 ghz features . the 621 ghz linewidth is considerably narrower than that ( @xmath42 km / s ) measured at this position for non - masing spectral lines such as those of h@xmath1cl@xmath43 ( neufeld et al . 2012 ) and cn ( rodriguez - franco et al . 2001 ) , for example and has its centroid at a lower lsr velocity ( @xmath44 km / s versus of 7.2 km / s ) . the strongest 22 ghz emission in orion south was detected in to 0 to + 17 km s@xmath45 lsr velocity range , but weaker features are present over a wider interval from @xmath46 to @xmath47 km s@xmath45 ; the latter range is somewhat wider than that obtained by gaume et al . 1998 ( @xmath48 to @xmath49 km s@xmath45 ; see their fig . 5 and table 2 ) in sensitive very large array observations performed in 1991 . the phenomenon of maser amplification in w49n and orion s is not unique to water . maser emission from hydroxyl radicals has been long been studied in w49n , but is believed to require different excitation conditions ( e.g. mader et al . 1975 ) . in orion south , voronkov et al . ( 2005 ) have reported 6.7 ghz @xmath50 emissions that are likely masing . in table 2 , we present the 22 ghz and 621 ghz photon luminosities for the three sources we have observed , each computed with the assumption that the emission is isotropic and for adopted distances of 414 pc ( orion - kl and orion - s ; menten et al . 2007 ) and 11400 pc ( w49n : gwinn , moran & reid 1992 ) . as we have noted in 3 above , however , particular velocity components that are clearly present in the 22 ghz spectra are sometimes unaccompanied by detectable 621 ghz line emission ( though the converse is never true ) , suggesting that the requirements for strong 621 ghz maser amplification are more stringent than those for strong 22 ghz maser action . thus , the source - averaged 621 ghz/22 ghz line ratios may be considerable smaller than those applying to specific 621 ghz emission features . accordingly , we have also computed luminosities and line ratios for specific velocity ranges in which strong 621 ghz emission is observed from orion - kl and orion - s . furthermore , as will be discussed further in 4.1.2 below , our mapping observations of orion - kl indicate that _ even when integrated over a narrow range of lsr velocities _ , the 621 ghz / 22 ghz line ratio varies spatially . in figure 6 , we present channel maps for the 22 ghz line emissions detected from orion - kl , with the location of the peak intensity marked by a red diamond , and the channel - averaged peak flux ( in jy / beam ) listed in red near the top of each panel . the two strongest velocity components , at @xmath28 km / s and @xmath51 km / s show peak intensities near @xmath52 and @xmath53 respectively , positions separated by 26@xmath38 , more than one - half the effelberg hpbw ( 41@xmath38 ) . km / s maser emission feature can be identified with a bursting maser feature observed using vlbi by hirota et al . ( 2011 ) and located at offset @xmath54 . this feature , which brightened dramatically in 2011 february ( tolmachev 2011 ) , is associated the orion compact ridge . hirota et al . suggested that the bursting maser emission arises in shocked gas associated with the interaction of an outflow with ambient material , and identified radio source i ( plambeck et al . 2009 ) as the likely origin of the outflow . the latter is located roughly 3400 au northeast of the bursting maser source , and is a site of well - studied sio maser emission ( e.g. matthews et al . ] moreover , as shown in figure 7 ( yellow contours ) , the peak 22 ghz line intensity integrated over the 10 13 km / s velocity range ( upper panel ) is clearly separated also from the location of the peak 621 ghz emission ( lower panel ) in the same velocity range , despite the similarity of the spectral line profiles shown in figure 4 ( lower panel ) . one intepretation of this separation is that the 22 ghz maser emission in this velocity range is actually the sum of two ( or more ) spatially distinct components , the stronger of which is unaccompanied by 621 ghz maser emission . to test this hypothesis , we have carefully compared the 10 13 km / s 22 ghz channel map with the beam profile for the effelsberg telescope . the latter was measured at 22 ghz by observing the compact continuum source 3c84 at the prime focus . the beam response function is shown in figure 8 ( black contours , upper panel ) , superposed on red contours indicating the best fit gaussian ( with a hpbw of @xmath55 ) . in each case , contours are labeled as a percentage of the peak response . the beam profile is reasonably well - approximated by a gaussian , with deviations less than @xmath56 of the peak intensity . the lower panel shows a grayscale representation of the residuals relative to the best - fit gaussian , with gray levels separated by 1@xmath57 of the peak intensity and the blue contour indicating a residual of zero . having determined the best - fit to the 22 ghz beam profile , we subtracted that beam profile centered at the centroid of the strongest 22 ghz maser emission ( at offset [ @xmath58,@xmath59 ) and rotated as appropriate for the mean parallactic angle of the orion - kl observations ( 19@xmath60 ) to 27@xmath60 ] from the observed profile of the 22 ghz maser emission for @xmath62 km / s . the grayscale background in figure 7 ( both panels ) represents the result of that subtraction , which we will henceforth refer to as the 22 ghz residual " ( i.e. the residual with respect to the intensity expected for a point source at offset [ @xmath58,@xmath59 ) . here , adjacent grayscale levels are separated by 1000 k km / s , corresponding to @xmath56 of the peak 22 ghz line intensity integrated over the 10 13 km / s velocity range . the spatial distribution of the 22 ghz residual " matches that of the 621 ghz line emission reasonably well , supporting the interpretation introduced at the of end the previous paragraph . thus , the ratio of the luminosity of the 621 ghz line to that of the 22 ghz _ residual _ provides our best estimate of the true maser line ratio in the 621 ghz - emitting gas : 0.28 ( table 2 ) . it is difficult to provide a quantitative estimate of the systematic uncertainty in the 22 ghz residual ; the latter depends upon the reproducibility of the effelsberg beam profile shown in figure 8 , an issue that is not presently constrained by observations . we note , however , that the peak flux in the residual is @xmath63 of the peak flux in the 10 13 km / s velocity range . by comparison , the maximum deviations from a gaussian in the beam response function ( blue contours in figure 8) are only 5@xmath57 of the peak response . this suggests that the likely error in our estimate of the residual flux is at most 25@xmath57 , even under the conservative assumption that the deviations from a gaussian profile have locations that vary from one observation to the next . in addition to comparing our observations of 621 ghz water emission with single - dish 22 ghz observations ( performed nearly contemporaneously ) , we may also compare them with interferometric observations of the 22 ghz maser transition . unfortunately , we are unaware of any such observations of the orion region performed in recent years . the only published map of 22 ghz maser features to cover the region of narrow 621 ghz emission is that presented by genzel et al . ( 1981 ) , based upon observations performed in 197779 ; more recent observations reported by gaume et al . 1998 do not extend far enough to the north . we have , however , located a set of more recent unpublished data , acquired using very large array ( vla ) on 1996 march 15 and covering the region of interest , in the national radio astronomy observatory ( nrao ) archive . our reduction of these data is described in the appendix , where we tabulate the velocities and positions of 339 maser spots of peak flux density exceeding 1 jy that were identified in our analysis . in figure 7 , blue , cyan and red circles show the locations of maser spots with lsr velocities in the 10 11 , 11 12 , and 12 13 km / s ranges , with the size of each circle indicating the peak flux on a logarithmic scale . figure 7 indicates that a strong 22 ghz maser counterpart was indeed present at a location and velocity close to that of the narrow 621 ghz emission , despite the 15 year time period that separates the two observing epochs . to help interpret the observed maser line ratios , we have updated the maser excitation models described by ( neufeld & melnick 1991 ; hereafter nm91 ) to make use of recent calculations of the rate coefficients for excitation of @xmath64 by h@xmath1 ( daniel , dubernet , & grosjean 2011 , extrapolated for additional states of h@xmath1o using the artificial neural network method introduced by neufeld 2010 ) . as in nm91 , we performed a parameter study in which the equations of statistical equilibrium for the h@xmath1o level populations were solved for a grid of temperatures , @xmath65 , h@xmath1 densities , @xmath66 , and water column densities , @xmath67 . these calculations were performed for a medium with a large velocity gradient , with use of a standard escape probability method to account for radiative trapping . these calculations yield two key quantities for any masing transition : ( 1 ) the line optical depth in the unsaturated limit , and ( 2 ) the line luminosity in the saturated limit . we computed the negative sobolev optical depth , along the direction of the velocity gradient , that would be obtained without the effect of maser amplification . these values are plotted in figure 9 , as a function of @xmath68 and @xmath65 , for four values of @xmath67 . here , red contours show results for the 22 ghz transition , and blue contours those for the 621 ghz transition . for both transitions , the sobolev optical depth is more negative than 3 within large regions of the parameter space plotted in figure 9 . at high densities , the level populations inevitably tend to their local thermodynamic equilibrium ( lte ) values , maser action is quenched , and the optical depths become positive ( in regions to the right of the contours labeled zero . ) as expected , the lower - frequency 22 ghz transition can maintain its population inversion up to higher gas densities than the 621 ghz transition , allowing for the possibility of maser amplification of the 22 ghz transition unaccompanied by maser emission in the 621 ghz transition . as discussed in 3 , _ this possibility is clearly realized in the observations reported here_. for example , the strong 14.5 km / s 22 ghz feature in orion south shows no detectable 621 ghz emission ; the implied upper limit on the 621 ghz/22 ghz line ratio is @xmath69 ) . at high densities ( e.g. @xmath70 at a temperature of 1000 k ) , the maser line ratio depends strongly upon temperature and density : thus , relatively modest variations in the physical conditions can lead to large changes in the emergent line ratio . the optical depths plotted in figure 9 are the values along sightlines _ parallel _ to the direction of the velocity gradient ( i.e. in the direction of _ minimum _ velocity coherence . ) in plane - parallel geometry , the optical depth of a masing transition formally approaches @xmath71 as the inclination of the ray approaches @xmath72 , although in reality the magnitude of the optical depth is limited by departures from plane - parallel geometry ( such as curvature in a shocked molecular shell , for example ) . nevertheless , the maximum optical depth in a typical interstellar region can easily exceed the sobolev optical depth by an order of magnitude : thus , a sobolev optical depth of 3 can easily produce a maser gain of @xmath73 . gain factors of this magnitude will reduce the population inversion , leading to maser saturation . we computed the maximum photon luminosity that can be obtained under conditions of saturation , with the use of the formalism discussed in nm91 . in essence , this is the maximum rate of stimulated emission that can occur without eliminating the population inversion . taking the ratio of these luminosities for the two transitions yields the results shown in figure 10 . if the 22 ghz and 621 ghz transition are both saturated and are similarly beamed , this luminosity ratio can be compared with the observed values in rightmost column of table 2 . this comparison indicates that the observed luminosity of the 621 ghz maser transition can be accounted for in the same collisional pumping model that has proved successful in explaining other masing transitions of interstellar water . in no velocity range , in any source , does the 621 ghz/22 ghz maser luminosity ratio exceed 1.16 ; given the likelihood of time variability ( in w49n and orion south where the observations were non - contemporaneous ) and other uncertainties associated with maser beaming , _ this value can be regarded as consistent with the range of values ( up to 0.8 ) predicted by the collisional excitation model_. unfortunately , and unlike some of the other submillimeter maser transitions ( e.g. melnick et al . 1993 ) , the 621 ghz transition does not provide strong constraints on the gas temperature ; thus the observed 621 ghz/22 ghz line ratios are consistent with either 400 k gas behind dissociative j - type shocks ( e.g. elitzur , hollenbach & mckee 1989 ) , or the hotter gas that can arise behind non - dissociative shocks ( kaufman & neufeld 1993 ) . a search for maser emission in the @xmath12 ( 471 ghz ) and @xmath11 ( 439 ghz ) transitions of water could provide a stronger constraint on the gas temperature , as these transitions can only be pumped significantly at temperatures @xmath74 k or higher ( melnick et al . we have performed _ herschel_/hifi mapping observations of the 621 ghz @xmath0 transition of ortho - h@xmath1o within a @xmath2 region encompassing the kleinmann - low nebula in orion , and pointed observations of that transition toward the orion south condensation and the w49n region of high - mass star formation . we also obtained ancillary observations of the 22.23508 ghz @xmath3 water maser transition using the effelsberg 100 m telescope . in the case of orion - kl , the 621 ghz and 22 ghz observations were carried out nearly contemporaneously ( within 10 days of each other ) . the key results of these observations are as follows : \1 . in all three sources , the 621 ghz water line emission shows clear evidence for strong maser amplification . in both orion - kl and orion south , the observations reveal a narrow ( @xmath4 km / s fwhm ) emission feature , superposed in the case of orion - kl on broad thermal line emission , with a velocity centroid that is consistent with that of an observed 22 ghz maser feature . in the case of w49n - for which observations were available at three epochs spanning a two year period - observed variability in the 621 ghz line profile provides further evidence for maser action . \2 . in all three sources , 621 ghz maser emission is apparently always accompanied by 22 ghz maser emission . our mapping observations of orion - kl reveal a spatial offset between the 621 ghz maser emission and the 22 ghz maser emission occuring at the same velocity . however , a careful analysis of the spatial distribution of the observed 22 ghz maser emission reveals two spatially - distinct components , the weaker of which is spatially coincident with the 621 ghz maser emission . the observed 621 ghz/22 ghz line ratios are always consistent with a maser pumping model in which the population inversions arise from the combined effects of collisional excitation and spontaneous radiative decay . the observed line ratios do not place strong constraints on the gas temperature , and thus the inferred physical conditions can plausibly arise behind either dissociative or non - dissociative shocks . the collisional excitation model predicts that the 22 ghz population inversion will be quenched at higher densities than that of the 621 ghz transition , providing a natural explanation for the observational fact that 22 ghz maser emission appears to be a necessary but insufficient condition for 621 ghz maser emission . hifi has been designed and built by a consortium of institutes and university departments from across europe , canada and the united states under the leadership of sron netherlands institute for space research , groningen , the netherlands and with major contributions from germany , france and the us . consortium members are : canada : csa , u. waterloo ; france : cesr , lab , lerma , iram ; germany : kosma , mpifr , mps ; ireland , nui maynooth ; italy : asi , ifsi - inaf , osservatorio astrofisico di arcetri- inaf ; netherlands : sron , tud ; poland : camk , cbk ; spain : observatorio astronmico nacional ( ign ) , centro de astrobiolog ( csic - inta ) . sweden : chalmers university of technology - mc2 , rss & gard ; onsala space observatory ; swedish national space board , stockholm university - stockholm observatory ; switzerland : eth zurich , fhnw ; usa : caltech , jpl , nhsc . support for this work was provided by nasa through an award issued by jpl / caltech . this study was partly based on observations with the 100-m telescope of the mpifr ( max - planck - institut fr radioastronomie ) at effelsberg . we are grateful to m. gerin for useful comments on the manuscript . we thank s. jones and collaborators for providing us with a draft of their results prior to publication . we have downloaded , from the nrao archive , a set of 22 ghz h@xmath1o maser data targeting orion - kl . the observations were performed on 1996 march 15 with the vla in its c configuration , as part of a project ( ac443 ) that targeted seven sources . the total observing time for that project was 3 hours , of which 16 minutes was devoted to on - source observations of orion - kl . the extragalactic radio source 0605 - 085 was used as a phase calibrator . in the absence of any non - variable radio source that could be used for absolute flux calibration , we established the flux density scale by assuming a flux density for 0605 - 085 of 1.7 jy , the value measured in 1997 december by ( kovalev et al . the spectral - line observations carried out with the 1.3 cm receivers employed a single intermediate frequency band ( if ) mode with total of 127 channels , each of width 49 khz , corresponding to 0.7 km s@xmath45 . the central channel was set to a local standard of rest ( lsr ) velocity of 10 km s@xmath45 for the 22 ghz transition , providing a total lsr velocity coverage from @xmath75 to + 52 km / s . the data were reduced with astronomical image processing system ( aips ) software package . after a standard flux and phase calibration , we used the strongest maser emission feature - which has a flux of 1500 jy and a v@xmath76 of 4.6 km s@xmath45 - for self calibration , and then applied the solutions to all the other channels . the fwhm primary beam of individual vla antennas is @xmath77 2@xmath78 . we imaged and cleaned the data by applying the natural weighting of the uv data , which resulted in a synthesized beam of size 1.3 @xmath79 1.0 ( fwhm ) at position angle 23@xmath80 . we produced a 2048 @xmath792048 maser image cube , with a cell size of 0.1 @xmath79 0.1 . we then used the aips task sad to detect maser emissions with peak intensity higher than 5 times the r.m.s . noise level . for line channels in the orion - kl region that are not limited by dynamic range , the r.m.s . noise level was @xmath77 0.12 jy . in table 3 , we list the parameters obtained for 339 maser emission spots , all selected to satisfy the following criteria : flux @xmath81 1 jy , signal noise ratio ( snr ) @xmath81 10 , and dynamic range @xmath81 0.01 . ( in other words , for channels with peak flux greater than 100 jy , we used a flux cutoff of 0.01 @xmath79 the peak flux ) . figure 11 shows distribution of maser spots , with the color and symbol size representing lsr velocity and peak flux respectively . for comparision with the 621 ghz maser feature observed toward orion - kl , we show in figure 12 the 22 ghz maser emission integrated over the 10 13 km s@xmath45 velocity range . the letters a , b , c , d , e and f mark subregions from which the spectra presented in figure 13 were extracted . these spectra were obtained at the peak of each subregion , after hanning smoothing the data with a kernel of fwhm @xmath82 . bergin , e. a. , phillips , t. g. , comito , c. , et al . 2010 , , 521 , l20 braatz , j. a. , reid , m. j. , humphreys , e. m. l. , et al . 2010 , , 718 , 657 beckwith , s. , persson , s. e. , neugebauer , g. , & becklin , e. e. 1978 , , 223 , 464 brunthaler , a. , reid , m. j. , falcke , h. , henkel , c. , & menten , k. m. 2007 , , 462 , 101 cheung , a. c. , rank , d. m. , townes , c. h. , thornton , d. d. , & welch , w. j. 1969 , , 221 , 626 daniel , f. , dubernet , m .- l . , & grosjean , a. 2011 , , 536 , a76 de graauw , t. , et al . 2010 , , 518 , l6 dreher , j. w. , johnston , k. j. , welch , w. j. , & walker , r. c. 1984 , , 283 , 632 elitzur , m. , hollenbach , d. j. , & mckee , c. f. 1989 , , 346 , 983 elitzur , m. 1992 , , 30 , 75 garay , g. , moran , j. m. , & haschick , a. d. 1989 , , 338 , 244 gaume , r. a. , wilson , t. l. , vrba , f. j. , johnston , k. j. , & schmid - burgk , j. 1998 , , 493 , 940 genzel , r. , reid , m. j. , moran , j. m. , & downes , d. 1981 , , 244 , 884 gwinn , c. r. , moran , j. m. , & reid , m. j. 1992 , , 393 , 149 harwit , m. , houde , m. , sonnentrucker , p. , et al . 2010 , , 521 , l51 hirota , t. , tsuboi , m. , fujisawa , k. , et al . 2011 , , 739 , l59 justtanont , k. , khouri , t. , maercker , m. , et al . 2012 , , 537 , a144 kaufman , m. j. , & neufeld , d. a. 1996 , , 456 , 250 kovalev , y. y. , nizhelsky , n. a. , kovalev , y. a. , et al . 1999 , , 139 , 545 kukolich , s. g. 1969 , , 50 , 3751 lo , k. y. 2005 , , 43 , 625 mader , g. l. , johnston , k. j. , knowles , s. h. , et al . 1975 , , 200 , l111 matthews , l. d. , greenhill , l. j. , goddi , c. , et al . 2010 , , 708 , 80 mcgrath , e. j. , goss , w. m. , & de pree , c. g. 2004 , , 155 , 577 melnick , g. j. , menten , k. m. , phillips , t. g. , & hunter , t. 1993 , , 416 , l37 melnick , g. j. , tolls , v. , neufeld , d. a. , et al . 2010 , , 521 , l27 menten , k. m. , melnick , g. j. , & phillips , t. g. 1990a , , 350 , l41 menten , k. m. , melnick , g. j. , phillips , t. g. , & neufeld , d. a. 1990b , , 363 , l27 menten , k. m. , lundgren , a. , belloche , a. , thorwirth , s. , & reid , m. j. 2008 , , 477 , 185 menten , k. m. , reid , m. j. , forbrich , j. , & brunthaler , a. 2007 , , 474 , 515 miyoshi , m. , moran , j. , herrnstein , j. , et al . 1995 , , 373 , 127 moran , j. m. , papadopoulos , g. d. , burke , b. f. , et al . 1973 , , 185 , 535 neufeld , d. a. , & melnick , g. j. 1991 , , 368 , 215 ( nm91 ) neufeld , d. a. , sonnentrucker , p. , phillips , t. g. , et al . 2010 , , 518 , l108 neufeld , d. a. 2010 , , 708 , 635 neufeld , d. a. , roueff , e. , snell , r. l. , et al . 2012 , , 748 , 37 ott , s. 2010 , astronomical data analysis software and systems xix , 434 , 139 pilbratt , g. l. , riedinger , j. r. , passvogel , t. , et al . 2010 , , 518 , l1 phillips , t. g. , kwan , j. , & huggins , p. j. 1980 , iaus , 87 , 21 plambeck , r. l. , wright , m. c. h. , friedel , d. n. , et al . 2009 , , 704 , l25 reid , m. j. , menten , k. m. , zheng , x. w. , brunthaler , a. , & xu , y. 2009 , , 705 , 1548 rodrguez - franco , a. , wilson , t. l. , martn - pintado , j. , & fuente , a. 2001 , , 559 , 985 roelfsema , p. r. , helmich , f. p. , teyssier , d. , et al . 2012 , , 537 , a17 tolmachev , a. 2011 , the astronomer s telegram , 3177 , 1 voronkov , m. a. , sobolev , a. m. , ellingsen , s. p. , & ostrovskii , a. b. 2005 , , 362 , 995 walker , r. c. , matsakis , d. n. , & garcia - barreto , j. a. 1982 , , 255 , 128 waters , j. w. , kakar , r. k. , kuiper , t. b. h. , et al . 1980 , , 235 , 57 r.a . ( j2000 ) & 5h 35 m 14.31s @xmath83 & 5h 35 m 13.44s & 19h 10 m 13.20s + declination ( j2000 ) & 5d 22@xmath78 23.2@xmath38 @xmath83 & 5d 24@xmath78 8.1@xmath38 & 9d 06@xmath78 12.0@xmath38 + + date & 2011 - 03 - 11 & 2010 - 08 - 31 & 2010 - 04 - 11 ( 1st epoch ) + & & & 2011 - 10 - 08 ( 2nd epoch ) + & & & 2012 - 04 - 14 ( 3rd epoch ) + total duration ( s ) & 3964 & 7482 & 226 @xmath84 ( 1st epoch ) + & & & 158 @xmath84 ( 2nd epoch ) + & & & 282 @xmath84 ( 3rd epoch ) + r.m.s . noise ( mk ) & 65 @xmath85 & 30 @xmath86 & 16 @xmath86 ( 1st epoch ) + & & & 16 @xmath86 ( 2nd epoch ) + & & & 12 @xmath86 ( 3rd epoch ) + hifi mode & otf mapping & full spectral scan & pointed + hifi key program & hexos & hexos & prismas / ddt + herschel aors # s & 134221591819 & 1342204001 & 134219452325 ( 1st epoch ) + & & & 134223037880 ( 2nd epoch ) + & & & 134224440204 ( 3rd epoch ) + + + date & 2011 - 03 - 21 & 2012 - 9 - 28 & 2012 - 10 - 01 + receiver & prime focus & secondary focus & prime focus + observing mode & raster map & on - off & on - off + gain ( @xmath87 ) & 0.9 k / jy & 0.9 k / jy & 0.9 k / jy + system temperature ( k)@xmath88 & 56 & 97 & 72 + orion - kl & [ 40 , 60 ] & 4.17(16)@xmath83 & 5.37(17 ) & 2.08(+45 ) & 7.50(+45 ) & 0.28 + orion - kl & [ 40 , 60 ] & 1.86(17)@xmath84 & 5.37(17 ) & 9.27(+43)@xmath84 & 7.50(+45 ) & 0.012 + orion - kl & [ 10 , 13 ] & 1.86(17)@xmath84 & 1.25(17 ) & 9.27(+43)@xmath84 & 1.74(+45 ) & 0.053 + orion - kl & [ 10 , 13 ] & 1.86(17)@xmath84 & 2.85(18)@xmath85 & 9.27(+43)@xmath84 & 3.96(+44)@xmath85 & 0.23 + orion s & [ 30 , 30 ] & 1.67(17 ) & 2.07(18 ) & 8.33(+43 ) & 2.88(+44 ) & 0.29 + & [ 4 , 7 ] & 8.95(18 ) & 2.77(19 ) & 4.46(+43 ) & 3.85(+43 ) & 1.16 + w49n & [ 80 , 100 ] & 5.22(15 ) & 2.09(16 ) & 1.97(+49 ) & 2.21(+49 ) & 0.89 + & [ 10 , 5 ] & 1.54(16 ) & 4.52(17 ) & 5.84(+47 ) & 4.77(+48 ) & 0.12 + & [ 5,0 ] & 1.79(16 ) & 1.43(17 ) & 6.75(+47 ) & 1.51(+48 ) & 0.45 + & [ 0 , 5 ] & 2.11(16 ) & 1.50(17 ) & 7.99(+47 ) & 1.58(+48 ) & 0.50 + & [ 5 , 10 ] & 2.80(16 ) & 2.18(17 ) & 1.06(+48 ) & 2.30(+48 ) & 0.46 + & [ 10 , 15 ] & 2.49(16 ) & 2.36(17 ) & 9.41(+47 ) & 2.49(+48 ) & 0.38 + & [ 15 , 20 ] & 2.04(16 ) & 6.89(18 ) & 7.71(+47 ) & 7.27(+47 ) & 1.06 + -31.8 & -2.4 & -2.8 & 7.9 & -21.2 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 7.1 & -12.6 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 10.7 & -6.6 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 20.2 + -31.8 & -0.2 & -2.3 & 4.0 & -20.5 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 15.2 & -11.9 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 14.9 & -5.9 & 3.5 & 3.2 & 163.4 + -31.1 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 13.2 & -19.9 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 10.9 & -11.9 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 13.2 & -5.9 & 6.4 & 11.1 & 152.9 + -30.5 & -2.4 & -2.8 & 8.1 & -19.9 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 7.7 & -11.2 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 18.2 & -5.9 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 21.5 + -30.5 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 4.3 & -19.2 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 15.5 & -11.2 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 13.4 & -5.3 & 3.5 & 3.2 & 333.6 + -29.8 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 13.4 & -19.2 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 4.3 & -10.6 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 15.9 & -5.3 & 6.4 & 11.1 & 101.3 + -29.1 & -2.4 & -2.8 & 8.4 & -18.5 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 11.4 & -10.6 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 14.9 & -5.3 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 27.8 + -29.1 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 4.6 & -18.5 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 8.3 & -9.9 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 18.9 & -5.3 & -2.5 & -2.7 & 22.6 + -28.5 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 13.6 & -17.9 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 15.9 & -9.9 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 17.5 & -4.6 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 1532.0 + -27.8 & -2.4 & -2.8 & 8.7 & -17.9 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 5.1 & -9.9 & -7.5 & -2.7 & 8.4 & -3.9 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 1379.0 + -27.8 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 5.0 & -17.2 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 12.0 & -9.2 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 17.2 & -3.3 & 3.5 & 3.2 & 153.3 + -27.2 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 13.8 & -17.2 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 9.1 & -9.2 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 16.9 & -3.3 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 23.8 + -26.5 & -2.4 & -2.8 & 9.0 & -16.5 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 16.2 & -9.2 & -7.6 & -2.7 & 6.6 & -2.6 & 3.4 & 3.0 & 148.6 + -26.5 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 5.3 & -16.5 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 6.1 & -8.6 & 3.6 & 3.2 & 35.5 & -2.6 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 44.5 + -25.8 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 14.0 & -15.9 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 12.6 & -8.6 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 19.7 & -2.6 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 28.2 + -25.2 & -2.4 & -2.8 & 9.3 & -15.9 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 9.9 & -8.6 & -7.6 & -2.7 & 11.8 & -2.6 & 6.4 & 11.1 & 5.6 + -25.2 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 5.7 & -15.2 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 16.7 & -7.9 & -7.6 & -2.7 & 34.4 & -1.9 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 26.3 + -24.5 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 14.3 & -15.2 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 7.3 & -7.9 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 19.3 & -1.3 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 63.8 + -23.8 & -2.4 & -2.8 & 9.7 & -14.6 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 13.2 & -7.9 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 18.6 & -1.3 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 56.4 + -23.8 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 6.2 & -14.6 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 10.8 & -7.3 & 3.5 & 3.2 & 47.0 & -1.3 & -2.5 & -2.7 & 33.3 + -23.2 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 14.6 & -13.9 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 17.2 & -7.3 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 20.5 & -1.3 & -3.2 & -0.8 & 17.4 + -22.5 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 10.1 & -13.9 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 8.8 & -7.3 & 6.4 & 11.1 & 8.5 & -0.6 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 28.3 + -22.5 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 6.6 & -13.2 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 14.0 & -7.3 & -7.6 & -2.7 & 4.2 & 0.0 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 113.8 + -21.8 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 14.9 & -13.2 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 11.9 & -6.6 & 3.5 & 3.5 & 29.7 & 0.7 & -3.1 & -0.8 & 37.3 + -21.2 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 10.5 & -12.6 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 17.7 & -6.6 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 22.8 & 0.7 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 31.2 + 1.4 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 1207.0 & 6.7 & -3.6 & -5.8 & 457.9 & 11.3 & -2.5 & -2.7 & 57.3 & 14.6 & -7.7 & -5.3 & 175.2 + 1.4 & -2.6 & -2.7 & 36.7 & 7.3 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 1372.0 & 12.0 & 9.7 & 14.5 & 50.4 & 14.6 & 22.8 & -6.9 & 98.6 + 2.0 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 1158.0 & 7.3 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 55.7 & 12.0 & -0.2 & -6.6 & 41.9 & 14.6 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 18.6 + 2.0 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 33.0 & 8.0 & -3.6 & -5.8 & 890.1 & 12.0 & -7.6 & -5.4 & 14.0 & 14.6 & -5.8 & -9.7 & 8.6 + 2.7 & -0.2 & -2.2 & 520.2 & 8.0 & 0.6 & -4.4 & 173.6 & 12.0 & 8.5 & 17.2 & 8.9 & 15.3 & 22.8 & -6.9 & 272.4 + 2.7 & -2.7 & -2.7 & 190.6 & 8.0 & 6.2 & 6.0 & 51.9 & 12.0 & 22.8 & -6.9 & 6.6 & 15.3 & -7.7 & -5.2 & 157.9 + 2.7 & 12.0 & -5.2 & 131.1 & 8.7 & -3.5 & -5.9 & 1163.0 & 12.7 & -11.8 & 34.0 & 307.3 & 15.3 & 3.4 & 3.6 & 44.8 + 3.4 & -0.2 & -2.3 & 626.0 & 8.7 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 151.9 & 12.7 & 9.7 & 14.5 & 67.8 & 15.3 & -3.7 & -5.6 & 34.5 + 3.4 & 12.0 & -5.2 & 64.7 & 8.7 & -2.5 & -2.7 & 151.3 & 12.7 & 12.4 & 16.9 & 39.2 & 15.3 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 24.4 + 3.4 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 40.3 & 8.7 & 6.2 & 6.0 & 112.2 & 12.7 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 37.5 & 15.3 & 18.1 & 1.2 & 16.1 + 4.0 & -3.6 & -5.8 & 607.0 & 8.7 & 0.5 & -4.4 & 71.5 & 12.7 & -0.2 & -6.6 & 19.4 & 15.3 & -0.1 & -2.4 & 16.0 + 4.0 & -0.5 & -2.0 & 110.9 & 8.7 & 20.6 & -3.9 & 62.3 & 12.7 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 16.8 & 16.0 & -7.6 & -5.4 & 295.0 + 4.0 & 3.4 & 1.5 & 67.7 & 9.3 & -4.1 & -5.1 & 683.6 & 13.3 & 8.5 & 17.2 & 212.5 & 16.0 & 22.8 & -6.8 & 28.9 + 4.0 & -2.4 & -2.8 & 63.8 & 9.3 & 20.7 & -4.0 & 215.9 & 13.3 & -11.9 & 34.1 & 121.4 & 16.0 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 15.2 + 4.0 & 3.6 & 3.2 & 21.9 & 9.3 & 2.9 & 3.3 & 81.1 & 13.3 & -7.9 & -5.3 & 77.3 & 16.6 & -7.6 & -5.4 & 110.6 + 4.7 & -0.3 & -2.2 & 555.0 & 9.3 & 6.2 & 6.0 & 53.7 & 13.3 & 12.3 & 16.9 & 29.1 & 16.6 & -3.7 & -5.6 & 27.2 + 4.7 & -3.5 & -5.9 & 439.5 & 9.3 & -0.2 & -6.6 & 34.6 & 13.3 & 22.8 & -6.9 & 12.8 & 16.6 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 21.7 + 4.7 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 49.6 & 9.3 & -11.8 & 34.0 & 30.0 & 13.3 & 17.2 & 13.9 & 12.3 & 16.6 & -0.1 & -2.4 & 14.2 + 5.4 & -0.4 & -2.1 & 218.6 & 10.0 & -4.0 & -5.1 & 1331.0 & 13.3 & -0.1 & -6.6 & 11.4 & 16.6 & 22.8 & -6.8 & 7.4 + 5.4 & -2.4 & -2.8 & 135.0 & 10.0 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 548.2 & 14.0 & 2.9 & 3.1 & 324.7 & 17.3 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 49.2 + 5.4 & 3.5 & 3.1 & 17.9 & 10.0 & -36.6 & -49.2 & 101.8 & 14.0 & 8.5 & 17.2 & 177.0 & 17.3 & 12.2 & 16.9 & 11.6 + 6.0 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 64.1 & 10.7 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 1573.0 & 14.0 & -7.9 & -5.2 & 47.2 & 18.0 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 19.0 + 6.0 & -0.2 & -2.3 & 54.4 & 11.3 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 736.1 & 14.0 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 30.8 & 18.0 & 5.8 & 22.7 & 12.8 + 6.0 & 20.9 & 8.8 & 34.4 & 11.3 & -11.8 & 34.1 & 593.2 & 14.0 & 17.2 & 13.8 & 21.7 & 18.6 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 170.6 + 6.7 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 767.3 & 11.3 & -0.2 & -6.6 & 67.1 & 14.0 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 18.0 & 18.6 & 0.7 & -3.9 & 41.3 + 18.6 & 12.2 & 16.9 & 8.4 & 22.6 & -14.0 & 13.3 & 10.7 & 27.3 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 7.0 & 34.6 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 6.3 + 19.3 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 141.6 & 22.6 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 8.3 & 27.3 & 0.8 & -4.5 & 3.9 & 35.2 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 6.0 + 19.3 & -3.0 & -5.8 & 94.4 & 22.6 & -8.4 & 14.7 & 5.9 & 27.9 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 7.2 & 35.2 & -2.6 & -2.8 & 5.2 + 19.3 & 0.6 & -3.9 & 73.6 & 22.6 & 12.3 & 16.9 & 3.7 & 28.6 & -2.5 & -2.7 & 9.0 & 35.2 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 4.1 + 19.3 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 17.3 & 23.3 & -3.6 & -5.7 & 13.0 & 28.6 & -3.6 & -5.8 & 8.0 & 35.2 & 12.1 & 17.0 & 3.1 + 19.3 & -0.2 & -2.3 & 10.9 & 23.3 & -2.5 & -2.7 & 11.8 & 28.6 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 7.6 & 35.9 & -10.6 & 11.6 & 35.0 + 20.0 & -2.8 & -5.8 & 136.2 & 23.3 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 11.7 & 28.6 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 6.2 & 35.9 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 6.2 + 20.0 & 0.6 & -3.9 & 36.1 & 23.3 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 9.6 & 29.2 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 7.0 & 36.5 & -10.6 & 11.6 & 203.0 + 20.0 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 9.1 & 23.9 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 7.9 & 29.9 & -2.5 & -2.7 & 8.6 & 36.5 & -2.6 & -2.8 & 6.2 + 20.0 & 12.2 & 16.9 & 7.1 & 23.9 & 12.3 & 16.9 & 2.5 & 29.9 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 7.3 & 36.5 & -0.1 & -2.3 & 5.3 + 20.6 & -3.0 & -5.8 & 63.5 & 24.6 & -3.6 & -5.8 & 11.3 & 29.9 & -3.6 & -5.9 & 7.1 & 37.2 & -10.6 & 11.6 & 122.8 + 20.6 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 27.4 & 24.6 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 10.4 & 29.9 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 5.6 & 37.2 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 6.2 + 20.6 & -2.5 & -2.7 & 15.8 & 24.6 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 9.4 & 30.6 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 6.8 & 37.2 & -10.5 & 9.3 & 3.3 + 20.6 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 10.9 & 24.6 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 9.0 & 31.2 & -2.5 & -2.7 & 10.8 & 37.9 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 5.5 + 21.3 & 0.8 & -4.4 & 11.9 & 24.6 & 0.9 & -4.6 & 5.2 & 31.2 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 6.9 & 37.9 & -2.6 & -2.8 & 4.4 + 21.3 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 8.7 & 25.3 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 7.6 & 31.2 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 5.1 & 37.9 & 12.1 & 17.0 & 3.8 + 21.3 & 12.3 & 16.9 & 5.1 & 25.3 & 12.4 & 16.8 & 1.5 & 31.9 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 6.6 & 37.9 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 3.7 + 21.3 & -5.2 & 9.5 & 1.8 & 25.9 & -3.6 & -5.8 & 10.0 & 32.6 & -2.6 & -2.7 & 7.2 & 38.5 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 5.8 + 21.9 & -14.1 & 13.3 & 23.0 & 25.9 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 9.5 & 32.6 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 6.6 & 38.5 & -10.6 & 11.6 & 3.7 + 21.9 & -3.5 & -5.7 & 17.3 & 25.9 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 8.5 & 32.6 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 4.7 & 39.2 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 5.3 + 21.9 & -2.6 & -2.7 & 16.1 & 25.9 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 8.0 & 33.2 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 6.4 & 39.2 & 12.1 & 17.0 & 4.1 + 21.9 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 15.8 & 26.6 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 7.4 & 33.9 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 6.3 & 39.2 & -2.6 & -2.8 & 3.9 + 21.9 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 10.2 & 27.3 & -3.6 & -5.8 & 8.9 & 33.9 & -2.6 & -2.8 & 5.7 & 39.2 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 3.5 + 21.9 & 0.8 & -4.6 & 5.9 & 27.3 & -2.5 & -2.8 & 8.6 & 33.9 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 4.4 & 39.9 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 5.7 + 21.9 & -8.3 & 14.8 & 5.2 & 27.3 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 8.1 & 33.9 & 12.1 & 17.0 & 2.7 & 39.9 & -10.6 & 11.6 & 2.2 + 40.5 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 5.1 & 42.5 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 5.5 & 45.8 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 5.4 & 48.5 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 4.0 + 40.5 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 4.4 & 43.2 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 4.9 & 45.8 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 4.4 & 49.1 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 5.0 + 40.5 & -2.6 & -2.8 & 3.6 & 43.2 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 4.7 & 45.8 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 2.9 & 49.8 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 5.9 + 40.5 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 3.4 & 43.2 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 3.2 & 45.8 & -2.6 & -2.8 & 2.5 & 49.8 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 3.8 + 41.2 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 5.6 & 43.2 & -2.6 & -2.8 & 3.0 & 46.5 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 5.2 & 50.5 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 4.9 + 41.2 & -10.6 & 11.6 & 1.5 & 43.8 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 5.4 & 47.2 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 5.6 & 51.1 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 6.1 + 41.8 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 4.9 & 44.5 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 5.1 & 47.2 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 4.2 & 51.1 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 3.7 + 41.8 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 4.6 & 44.5 & -0.2 & -2.4 & 4.5 & 47.2 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 2.9 & 51.1 & -2.7 & -2.8 & 1.7 + 41.8 & -2.6 & -2.8 & 3.3 & 44.5 & -2.6 & -2.8 & 2.7 & 47.8 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 5.1 & 51.8 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 4.8 + 41.8 & -7.7 & -5.4 & 3.3 & 45.2 & 3.5 & 3.0 & 5.3 & 48.5 & 12.2 & 17.0 & 5.8 + , @xmath89(average of four closest positions for the 621 ghz line or 2 closest positions for the 22 ghz line ) . lower panel : the 9 14 km / s velocity range , after subtraction of a broad pedestal ( 621 ghz line ) , and with two linear polarizations shown separately . , width=14 ] , @xmath90 ) . successive grayscale values are separated by 1000 jy km / s per beam , with the lowest value corresponding to negative residuals in the interval [ 1000 jy km / s per beam , 0 ] . open circles show the locations of 22 ghz maser spots observed in vla observations performed on 1996 march 15 ( see appendix ) . blue , cyan and red circles indicate lsr velocities in the 10 11 , 11 12 , and 12 13 km / s ranges , respectively , with the size of each circle indicating the flux on a logarithmic scale . offsets are shown in arcsec , computed relative to orion - kl at position @xmath19 ( j2000).,width=7 ] , where @xmath92 is the sobolev optical depth . these optical depths apply in the direction of the velocity gradient ( for which the magnitude of the optical depth is smallest ) . red and blue contours apply to the 22 ghz and 621 ghz maser transitions respectively.,width=12 ] o maser spectra extracted from the vla image cube . the six spectra were extracted from the peak positions labeled a , b , c , d , e and f in figure 12 , by hanning smoothing the data in spatial coordinates ( with a kernel of fwhm @xmath82 ) . some spectra show ringing artifacts associated with the gibbs phenomenon ; these can occur when a strong maser feature is narrower than the channel width.[fig - spectra],title="fig:",width=5]o maser spectra extracted from the vla image cube . the six spectra were extracted from the peak positions labeled a , b , c , d , e and f in figure 12 , by hanning smoothing the data in spatial coordinates ( with a kernel of fwhm @xmath82 ) . some spectra show ringing artifacts associated with the gibbs phenomenon ; these can occur when a strong maser feature is narrower than the channel width.[fig - spectra],title="fig:",width=5]o maser spectra extracted from the vla image cube . the six spectra were extracted from the peak positions labeled a , b , c , d , e and f in figure 12 , by hanning smoothing the data in spatial coordinates ( with a kernel of fwhm @xmath82 ) . some spectra show ringing artifacts associated with the gibbs phenomenon ; these can occur when a strong maser feature is narrower than the channel width.[fig - spectra],title="fig:",width=5 ] o maser spectra extracted from the vla image cube . the six spectra were extracted from the peak positions labeled a , b , c , d , e and f in figure 12 , by hanning smoothing the data in spatial coordinates ( with a kernel of fwhm @xmath82 ) . some spectra show ringing artifacts associated with the gibbs phenomenon ; these can occur when a strong maser feature is narrower than the channel width.[fig - spectra],title="fig:",width=5]o maser spectra extracted from the vla image cube . the six spectra were extracted from the peak positions labeled a , b , c , d , e and f in figure 12 , by hanning smoothing the data in spatial coordinates ( with a kernel of fwhm @xmath82 ) . some spectra show ringing artifacts associated with the gibbs phenomenon ; these can occur when a strong maser feature is narrower than the channel width.[fig - spectra],title="fig:",width=5]o maser spectra extracted from the vla image cube . the six spectra were extracted from the peak positions labeled a , b , c , d , e and f in figure 12 , by hanning smoothing the data in spatial coordinates ( with a kernel of fwhm @xmath82 ) . some spectra show ringing artifacts associated with the gibbs phenomenon ; these can occur when a strong maser feature is narrower than the channel width.[fig - spectra],title="fig:",width=5 ] Abstract:
[ "using the _ herschel space observatory _ s heterodyne instrument for the far - infrared ( hifi ) , we have performed mapping observations of the 620.701 ghz @xmath0 transition of ortho - h@xmath1o within a @xmath2 region encompassing the kleinmann - low nebula in orion , and pointed observations of that transition toward the orion south condensation and the w49n region of high - mass star formation . using the effelsberg 100 m radio telescope , we obtained ancillary observations of the 22.23508 ghz @xmath3 water maser transition ; in the case of orion - kl , the 621 ghz and 22 ghz observations were carried out within 10 days of each other . the 621 ghz water line emission shows clear evidence for strong maser amplication in all three sources , exhibiting narrow ( @xmath4 km / s fwhm ) emission features that are coincident ( kinematically and/or spatially ) with observed 22 ghz features . moreover , in the case of w49n for which observations were available at three epochs spanning a two year period the spectra exhibited variability . the observed 621 ghz/22 ghz line ratios are consistent with a maser pumping model in which the population inversions arise from the combined effects of collisional excitation and spontaneous radiative decay , and the inferred physical conditions can plausibly arise in gas heated by either dissociative or non - dissociative shocks . the collisional excitation model also predicts that the 22 ghz population inversion will be quenched at higher densities than that of the 621 ghz transition , providing a natural explanation for the observational fact that 22 ghz maser emission appears to be a necessary but insufficient condition for 621 ghz maser emission ." ]
12,246
12,246
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the path integral method within the lagrange formalism is a fundamental tool to formulate quantum field theory . certainly , the treatment of the same theory within the canonical operator formalism is somewhat more cumbersome . in fact , additionally to the operator - ordering problems of gauge theories @xcite , the formal invariance properties of a generic theory admit additional transformation laws which are not present in the lagrange formulation . the `` momentum fields '' in such a case are not related to the fundamental fields by means of the canonical equations , see , _ e.g. _ , ref.@xcite , but constitute separate degrees of freedom with independent transformation properties and thus symmetries . as a consequence the number of variables in the path integral increases in comparison to the lagrange formalism . this introduces for most theories considerable additional complications in perturbative as well as non - perturbative calculations @xcite . on the other hand , some recent studies indicate that the first order formalism proves to be a successful tool to study the required complete cancellation of the energy divergences @xcite that emerge in a perturbative treatment of coulomb gauge yang - mills theory within the standard lagrange formalism @xcite . coulomb gauge yang - mills theory has attracted attention since one possible solution to the confinement problem in qcd is provided by the `` gribov - zwanziger '' scenario @xcite ( _ cf . _ also ref.@xcite ) . however , the problem of renormalizing coulomb gauge yang - mills theory is still unsolved since these energy divergences can not be regularized using any of the standard procedures . recently it was illustrated how these energy divergences cancel at each order in perturbation theory @xcite . in order to perform explicit calculations a number of methods have been applied as _ e.g. _ introducing a novel method to regularize feynman integrals in non - covariant gauges @xcite , employing algebraic renormalizability @xcite , and trying to recover coulomb gauge yang - mills theory as a limit of an interpolating gauge @xcite . on the other hand , there are several indications that the canonical or first order formalism is better suited for studying coulomb gauge yang - mills theory @xcite . yet , even if such an approach would be successful , due to the dramatically complicated form of the functional equations in the first order formalism , an explicit non - perturbative study is far too involved to be computationally feasible . therefore , an analysis in the second order formalism would be highly desirable . to this end we provide general connections between the greens functions in the two formulations that should help to perform the renormalization in the lagrange framework according to the insight in the renormalization procedure obtained in the hamilton framework . in order to establish general relations between dressed correlation functions in the different formulations we exploit the following properties . at vanishing sources associated to the momentum fields the effective action ( _ i.e. _ the generating functional of one - particle - irreducible ( 1pi ) green s functions ) of the hamilton formalism reduces to the one of the lagrangean approach . this allows to reduce the set of dyson - schwinger equations ( dses ) @xcite in the first order formalism to the corresponding set derived from the standard path integral representation . an important special case is given if the hamiltonian is quadratic in the momentum fields . for a corresponding generating functional the integration over the momentum fields can be performed and any @xmath1point function involving this field as the average of a polylocal function of the quantum canonical momentum fields can be determined . this means that the full correlation functions involving these canonical variables can be found as a functional of those that usually appear in the standard path integral representation . the procedure to find these connections is closely related to the functional method used in the derivation of the dses ( see _ e.g. _ ref . @xcite ) . in this paper we give the explicit form of these relations for a general four - dimensional renormalizable theory . this includes the case that the interaction terms involve the time derivative of the fields . in a final step we resolve the relations between the proper two - point functions in both frames by considering the inverse of the matrix - valued propagators in the hamiltonian approach . moreover , we show that similar connections arise for theories where not the kinetic but the interaction part is linearized . such a bosonization procedure is an important technique used in many parts of physics ranging from hadronic physics to condensed matter systems . our results explicitly verify , in agreement with other approaches , that there is no double counting in bosonized theories , but instead a given correlation function in the underlying theory is exactly given by the sum of all possible contributions involving both the fundamental and the composite degrees of freedom in the bosonized theory . this paper is organized as follows : in sect . ii the functional equations for dses and a symmetry - related identity ( like ward - green - takahashi , resp . slavnov - taylor , identities ( stis ) of a gauge theory @xcite ) in the phase space formulation are given . in sect . iii we present the first order dses of theories which are quadratic in the momentum fields . in addition , we derive a method to determine the correlation functions and the stis including momentum fields from the respective quantities that usually appear in the standard lagrange representation . diagrammatic rules and the general decomposition of the full proper functions in the lagrange formalism are given in sect . iv , while in sect . v and sect . vi we detail the explicit decomposition of the connected and proper two - point functions in the hamilton framework , respectively . in sect . vii we show that the formalism can also be utilized in the case composite of auxiliary fields , and last but not least in sect . viii we apply the formalism to the case of coulomb gauge yang - mills theory . in the last section we conclude while essential steps of many calculations have been deferred to several appendices . we start our analysis by considering a generic quantum field theory formulated within the first order formalism . the hamiltonian density @xmath2 depends on the fundamental fields @xmath3 and the conjugate momentum fields @xmath4 , respectively . as will be discussed in sect . iv.d , for fermionic fields the relation between the two formalisms is trivial . therefore we will treat only the case of bosonic fields in this and the next section . in the case of gauge invariant theories we will suppose that the hamiltonian @xmath5 includes the additional terms that arise when the constraints associated to such theories , like _ e.g. _ gauss law in quantum electrodynamics , are localized . in this context each lagrange multiplier necessary to impose the constraints will be treated as a fundamental field . certainly the presence of these terms leads to the main differences between gauge theories and the more conventional hamiltonian systems . in addition , in a fixed gauge , ghost fields appear . the usual path integral representation of these grassmannian variables is formulated within the first order formalism ( see also sect . iv.c ) . thus , in the case of a gauge theory they will be analysed in an independent way ( for details see sect . [ sec : coulomb ] ) . in this section , to set up the problem , we will disregard for the moment these potential complications . let us suppose , in addition , that the fields @xmath4 and @xmath3 are coupled to a set of classical sources given by @xmath6 and @xmath7 , respectively . under such conditions the source dependent vacuum - to - vacuum transition amplitude between the asymptotic states @xmath8 and @xmath9 looks like @xmath10&=&\langle\mathrm{vac},\mathrm{out}|\mathrm{vac } , \mathrm{in}\rangle_{j}\nonumber\\&= & \int \mathcal{d}[q]\mathcal{d}[p ] \exp\left\{\frac{i}{\hbar}\left(i\left[q , p , j\right]+i\epsilon\textrm{-terms}\right)\right\}\;\;\;\label{gen}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath11 $ ] denotes the collection of all fundamental fields , whereas @xmath12 $ ] the corresponding momentum fields . for more details see section @xmath13 of the ref . @xcite . here the argument in the exponential has the structure @xmath14=i_0\left[q , p\right]+\int d^4x j(x)\cdot\phi(x)\ ] ] where @xmath15 include both momentum and fundamental fields and sources . the components of the sources in this notation are distinguished by upper labels , whereas @xmath16&= & \int_{-\infty}^\infty d\tau \bigg ( \int d^3\textbf{x}\big ( p_m(x)\dot{q}_m(x ) \nonumber \\ & & \qquad \qquad \qquad -\mathcal{h}\left(q(x),p(x)\right)\big ) \bigg ) \label{acv } \end{aligned}\ ] ] looks like the classical expression for the hamiltonian action . note that the part concerning to the @xmath17 terms in eq . ( [ gen ] ) have the function to produce the necessary @xmath18 in the denominators of all propagators such that the correct boundary conditions of the fields at asymptotic times , @xmath19 , are implemented ( see again ref . @xcite ) . the fact that @xmath20 $ ] looks like the action expressed in terms of canonical variables is somewhat misleading since the momentum fields @xmath4 are independent variables and therefore * not yet * related to the fundamental fields @xmath3 or their derivatives . in particular , since the path integral is not saturated by its saddle point(s ) they are not constrained to obey the equations of motion of classical hamiltonian dynamics @xmath21 where @xmath22 the path integrals , however , contain the information about these equations of motion . indeed , let us consider the operator version of eq . ( [ me1 ] ) . its vacuum expectation values in the presence of the external classical sources can be expressed as @xmath23\mathcal{d}[p]\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta\phi } \exp\left\{\frac{i}{\hbar}i\left[q , p , j\right]\right\ } } { \langle0_\mathrm{out}\vert0_\mathrm{in}\rangle_{j } } -j.\ ] ] assuming the absence of any boundary terms , the integral of such a functional derivative vanishes . then by substituting each of the elementary objects present in eq . ( [ me1 ] ) by the derivative with regard to the respective classical sources , the following functional differential equation arises @xmath24=-j(x)\mathcal{z}[j ] . \label{partida1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it contains all equations of motions fulfilled by all green s functions . introducing the generating functional of connected green s functions , @xmath25=-i\ln\left(\mathcal{z}[j]\right)$ ] , allows us to rewrite eq . ( [ partida1 ] ) as @xmath26 where in the last step we made use of the following identity @xmath27 for arbitrary functionals @xmath28 and @xmath29 . this set of equations constitutes the dses for the connected green s functions . in the next step we introduce the vacuum expectation values of the momentum and the fundamental fields in the presence of sources @xmath30=\frac{1}{i}\frac{\delta\mathcal{w}^h}{\delta j(x)}\equiv \left(\begin{array}{c } \bar{p}[j]\\ \\\bar{q}[j ] \end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c } \frac{1}{i } \frac{\delta\mathcal{w}^h}{\delta j^p_{m}}\\ \\ \frac{1}{i } \frac{\delta\mathcal{w}^h}{\delta j^q_{m } } \end{array}\right).\ ] ] we assume that it is possible to invert these relations such that the sources are expressed as functionals of the vacuum expectation values of @xmath31 and @xmath32 . hereby the replacements of variables in eq . ( [ wsde1 ] ) becomes @xmath33(x)+ \frac{\hbar}{i}\int d^4x^\prime\mathbb{d}[j](x , x^\prime ) \frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{\phi}(x^\prime)}\label{r11}\ ] ] where @xmath34(x , x^{\prime})\equiv\left(\begin{array}{cccc } \delta_{ml}^{pp}[j](x , x^{\prime } ) & \delta_{ml}^{pq}[j](x , x^{\prime } ) \\ & \\ \delta_{ml}^{qp}[j](x , x^{\prime } ) & \delta_{ml}^{qq}[j](x , x^{\prime } ) \end{array}\right)\label{cpro}\ ] ] are the source - dependent two - point green s function where @xmath35 } { \delta j^{p}(x)\delta j^{q}(x^\prime)}=\frac{\delta \bar{q}_l[j](x^\prime ) } { \delta j^{p}(x)}\ ] ] and @xmath36,$ ] @xmath37 $ ] and @xmath38 $ ] are analogously defined . the effective action in the first order formalism @xmath39 $ ] can be defined by the legendre transform of @xmath25 $ ] with respect to the associated `` averaged '' fields of the theory @xmath40\stackrel{def}{\equiv}\mathcal{w}^h[j]- \int d^4x j(x)\cdot\bar{\phi}(x).\label{ea}\ ] ] remember that the compact notation implies a twofold legendre transformation in the two independent components @xmath41 and @xmath42 . by considering the functional derivative of @xmath43 $ ] with respect to @xmath44 and @xmath45 we obtain as expected @xmath46 substituting eq . ( [ eq : ecmov ] ) into eq . ( [ wsde1 ] ) , however , we obtain with the replacement eq . ( [ r11 ] ) the desired functional differential equations for @xmath43,$ ] @xmath47(x)+ \frac{\hbar}{i}\int d^4x^{\prime}\mathbb{d}[j](x , x^\prime ) \frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{\phi}(x^\prime ) } } \ , .\label{sdev}\ ] ] this relation generates all dses for the 1pi green s functions of the first order formalism . the method to obtain such a functional relation will be employed several times in the following . the derivation of the proper propagators is straightforward when keeping in mind that they are embedded in a matrix . in fact , taking a derivative with regard @xmath48 in eq . ( [ sdev ] ) we obtain @xmath49}(x^{\prime\prime},x^\prime)\equiv\left(\begin{array}{cccc } \frac{\delta^2\gamma^h}{\delta\bar{p_m}(x^{\prime\prime } ) \delta\bar{p}_n(x^\prime ) } & \frac{\delta^2\gamma^h } { \delta\bar{p_m}(x^{\prime\prime})\delta\bar{q}_n(x^\prime ) } \\ & \\ \frac{\delta^2\gamma^h}{\delta\bar{q_m}(x^{\prime\prime } ) \delta\bar{p}_n(x^\prime ) } & \frac{\delta^2\gamma^h } { \delta\bar{q_m}(x^{\prime\prime})\delta\bar{q}_n(x^\prime ) } \end{array}\right).\label{pgf}\ ] ] this expression and eq . ( [ cpro ] ) are related via the identity @xmath50(x , x^{\prime\prime } ) \mathbb{g[\phi]}(x^{\prime\prime},x^\prime)=-\mathbb{i},\label{unidad}\ ] ] which can be obtained by taking a derivative with respect to the source @xmath51 in eq . ( [ eq : ecmov ] ) . hereby @xmath52 denotes the identity in the considered space . any other connected or proper green s function can be derived by considering higher order derivatives with respect to @xmath51 and @xmath53 in eq . ( [ cpro ] ) and eq . ( [ pgf ] ) , respectively . in general , these functions are constrained by the symmetry properties of the initial `` action '' . in the case of a gauge theory a corresponding derivation leads to the stis . for coulomb gauge yang - mills theory it is presented in sect . [ sec : coulomb ] . here we will illustrate the potential complications arising in the first order formalism . for this it sufficient to assume that @xmath54 is invariant under the simultaneous infinitesimal transformations @xmath55\equiv\epsilon \cdot \left(\begin{array}{c } \mathfrak{g}_m^q\left[p , q\right ] \\ \\ \mathfrak{f}_m^p\left[p , q\right]\end{array}\right)\label{transfi}\ ] ] and also assume that they leave the path integration measure invariant . performing this substitution in eq . ( [ gen ] ) we can obtain the following `` symmetry - related functional identity '' @xmath56\mathcal{d}[p]\int d^4 x j(x)\cdot\delta\phi(x ) \exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}i\left[\phi , j\right]\right].\label{slavnov}\ ] ] in the next step we substitute the fundamental and momentum fields by the respective derivatives with respect to the classical source . following a procedure similar to the derivation of the dses we rewrite the symmetry - related identity eq . ( [ slavnov ] ) and express it in terms of the full generating functional @xmath57 $ ] : @xmath58\mathcal{z}[j].\label{comparar}\ ] ] analogously , the above relation can be rewritten for connected green s functions @xmath59\vert_{\phi\to\frac{\delta\mathcal{w}^h}{\delta j}+\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta j } } .\label{comparar1}\ ] ] as before , eq . ( [ slavnov ] ) can be reformulated in terms of the effective action @xmath60\right\vert_{\phi\to\bar{\phi}[j]+ \frac{\hbar}{i}\int d^4y\mathbb{d}[j](x , y)\frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{\phi}(y ) } } .\label{comparar2}\ ] ] this identity verifies that the effective action in first order formalism preserves the continuous symmetries of the initial canonical quantum action . at this point the dses and the symmetry - related identity eq . ( [ slavnov ] ) of a qft seem to be more cumbersome than the usual one which appear in the standard path integral formulation . however , in the next section we shall show that under certain conditions the above system can be reduced to the latter one . from here on we will denote all the variables a field depends on by a single latin index . for instance in case of a gauge field such indices will indicate the space - time point @xmath61 , the vectorial index @xmath62 , and the adjoint gauge group index @xmath63 . repeated indices are summed and integrated over for discrete and continuous variables , respectively . also all fundamental fields will be denoted by the same letter @xmath41 . similarly , @xmath42 will represent all momentum fields . let us now consider the path integral representation of a @xmath0-point function involving only momentum fields @xmath64\mathcal{d}[p]p_{i_1}\ldots p_{i_n}\exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}i[q , p , j]\right ] } { i^{1-n}\int\mathcal{d}[q]\mathcal{d}[p ] \exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}i[q , p , j]\right]}\;\;\ ; .\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath65 is the time ordering operator , and @xmath66 are the hermitian momentum field operators in the heisenberg picture . the expression ( [ delta ] ) can be written via functional derivatives with respect to @xmath67 as @xmath68\mathcal{d}[p]\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta j^p_{i_1}}\ldots\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta j^p_{i_n}}\exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}\left\ { i[q , p , j]\right\}\right]}{i^{1-n}\int\mathcal{d}[q]\mathcal{d}[p ] \exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}\left\{i[q , p , j]\right\}\right]}.\label{ass}\ ] ] in the following we will consider only the important class of hamiltonians which are at most quadratic in the momentum fields . note that this case is realized for all renormalizable and most non - renormalizable theories . for later use we write the hamiltonian in the form @xmath69p_m+\mathcal{b}_i[q]p_i+ \mathcal{c}[q],\label{hamiltoniand1}\ ] ] which defines a real , symmetric , positive and non - singular matrix @xmath70 as well as the real functionals of @xmath41 , @xmath71 $ ] and @xmath72 $ ] . for the considered class of hamiltonians the gaussian integration over @xmath42 can be performed analytically . as shown in appendix [ app : p - int ] it yields an expression of the form @xmath68\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta j^p_{i_1}}\ldots\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta j^p_{i_n}}\exp{\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}\tilde{\mathcal{s}}[q , j]\right ] } } { i^{1-n}\int \mathcal{d}[q]\exp{\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}\tilde{\mathcal{s}}[q , j]\right]}}. \label{ass111}\ ] ] the general result for the new action arising in the exponential is given in eq . ( [ gac ] ) . for simplicity we will discuss first the standard hamiltonian with @xmath73=\delta_{ij}$ ] . the general case where @xmath70 is non - trivial is realized _ e.g. _ in the case of coulomb gauge qcd which will be discussed in sect . [ sec : coulomb ] . ( for the moment we only note that then the inverse matrix , @xmath74 $ ] , appears in the following expressions as a prefactor of @xmath75 making in general the action @xmath76 non - local . ) in the considered simpler standard case the new action possesses the structure @xmath77=\mathcal{s}_0 + \frac{1}{2}j^p_{i}j^p_{i}+j^p_{i}\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta\dot{q}_i}+ j^q_{i}q_i \label{actionlf}\ ] ] where @xmath78 is the standard action @xmath79=\frac{1}{2}\dot{q}^i \dot{q}^i -\dot{q}^i \mathcal{b}^i[q]\ + \frac{1}{2}\mathcal{b}^i[q]\mathcal{b}^i[q]- \mathcal{c}[q ] \ , .\label{act}\ ] ] the application of eq . ( [ especial ] ) on the integrand present in eq.([ass111 ] ) makes it possible to write @xmath68\left\{\hat{\mathcal{o}}_{i_1\ldots i_{n-1}}^{p\ldots p } \left(j^p_{i_n}+\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta \dot{q}_{i_n}}\right)\right\}\exp{\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}\tilde{\mathcal{s } } \right]}}{i^{1-n}\int \mathcal{d}[q]\exp{\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}\tilde{\mathcal{s}}\right]}}. \label{ass11}\ ] ] where the operator @xmath80 only acts on the function inside the curly brackets . note that the integrand in the numerator is a functional depending on the fields @xmath41 as well as the sources @xmath81 and @xmath75 . analogous to eq . ( [ wsde1 ] ) we can write the partially integrated expression eq . ( [ ass11 ] ) in terms of the generating functional of connected green s functions . let us specialize to the case of one - point green s functions , _ i.e. , _ the vacuum expectation values of the momentum fields @xmath82=\left.\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta \dot{q}_i } \right\vert_{q\to\frac{\delta\mathcal{w}^h}{\delta j^q}+ \frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta j^q}}+j^p_{i}= \frac{\delta \mathcal{w}^h}{\delta j^p_{i}(\textbf{x},\tau)}.\label{mge1}\ ] ] eq . ( [ eq : ecmov ] ) allows to express eq . ( [ mge1 ] ) as @xmath83+\frac{\hbar}{i } \delta^{qq}[j]\frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{q}}}.\label{mge11}\ ] ] here the dependence on the average momentum fields is made explicit and the action in the lagrange formalism appears which depends only on the @xmath41-fields . from a functional point of view it is more convenient to express this via eq . ( [ mge1 ] ) as @xmath84_{\phi\to\bar{\phi}[j]+ \frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{\phi\phi}[j]\frac{\delta}{\delta \phi}}.\label{mge11v}\ ] ] now , employing the identity @xmath56\frac{\delta}{\delta q_m}\int\mathcal{d}[p ] \exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}i[q , p , j]\right]\label{ef1sd}\ ] ] we perform the @xmath85integration , so that the above expression reads @xmath86\left(\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta q_i}+ j^p_{m}\frac{\delta^2\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta q_i\delta \dot{q}_m}+j^q_{i}\right ) \exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}\tilde{\mathcal{s}}[q , j]\right],\ ] ] which makes it possible to obtain an analogous form of the field equations @xmath87+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{\phi\phi}[j ] \frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{\phi}}}.\label{sdeqqq}\ ] ] eqs . ( [ mge11v ] ) and ( [ sdeqqq ] ) represent alternative forms of the first order dses ( [ sdev ] ) . this alternative form of the dses allows us to find corresponding equations for the fundamental proper green s functions by taking derivatives with respect to the momentum and/or fundamental fields . this way the proper momentum propagator can be written as @xmath88+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{qq}[j ] \frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{q}}}\right),\label{mge12}\ ] ] whereas the corresponding mixed green s function is @xmath89+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{qq}[j ] \frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{q}}}\right).\label{mge13}\ ] ] in a similar way , the other mixed propagator can be written as @xmath90+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{qq}[j]\frac{\delta } { \delta \bar{q } } } \right)\nonumber\\&-&\left.\frac{\delta^2\gamma^h } { \delta \bar{p}_i\delta\bar{p}_m}\frac{\delta^2\mathcal{s}_0 } { \delta q_j\delta \dot{q}_m}\right\vert_{\phi\to \bar{\phi}[j ] + \frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{\phi\phi}[j]\frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{\phi } } } \label{sppdeqqqpr},\end{aligned}\ ] ] whereas the fundamental field propagator is given by @xmath91 + \frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{qq}[j]\frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{q } } } \right)\nonumber\\&- & \left.\frac{\delta^2\gamma^h}{\delta \bar{q}_i\delta\bar{p}_m } \frac{\delta^2\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta q_j\delta \dot{q}_m } \right\vert_{\phi_j\to \bar{\phi}[j]+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{\phi\phi}[j ] \frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{\phi } } } .\label{sppdeqqq}\end{aligned}\ ] ] hereby , in the derivation of eqs . ( [ sppdeqqqpr ] ) and ( [ sppdeqqq ] ) we have discarded those terms that vanish when the sources are set to zero . in addition , note that the proliferated occurrence of green s functions involving the @xmath85field arises from functional derivatives on @xmath92 $ ] . as will become clear below , despite the different appearance , the structure of eqs . ( [ sppdeqqqpr ] ) and ( [ sppdeqqq ] ) is related to the one of eqs . ( [ mge12 ] ) and ( [ mge13 ] ) . in this subsection we derive expressions for first order correlation functions entirely in terms of second order correlation functions . to this end , we start from eq . ( [ ass11 ] ) . subsequently , we again follow a procedure similar to that used in the derivation of eq . ( [ wsde1 ] ) thus arriving at a general expression for arbitrary momentum correlation functions , @xmath93_{q\to \frac{\delta\mathcal{w}}{\delta j^{q}}+\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta j^{q}}}\label{mge}\ ] ] in contrast to the corresponding equation for the one - point function , eq.([mge1 ] ) , ( which did lead to the alternative set of dses ) here the connected generating functional in the standard lagrange formalism appears . note that the latter does not depend on @xmath75 anymore . from the above functional equation , any other @xmath94-point green s function with @xmath0-external legs associated to the @xmath95 s is obtained by taking @xmath96 derivatives with regard to @xmath97 and setting them to zero . in particular , the quantum average of the momentum fields becomes a functional of the averaged field @xmath98 , @xmath99=\left.\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta \dot{q}_i } \right\vert_{q_m\to\bar{q}_i[j^q]+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta_{ij}^{qq}[j^q ] \frac{\delta}{\delta q_j}}\label{momenta}.\ ] ] already at this point we want to point out that the averaged momentum field is generally not given by the usual definition of a canonical momentum field @xmath100 on the level of the effective action @xmath101=\left < \frac{\delta s}{\delta \dot q } \right > \neq \frac{\delta \gamma } { \delta \dot{\bar q } } \equiv \mathfrak{p}_i^{\mathrm{can } } \ , .\ ] ] this will be shown explicitly in subsection [ sub : proper - hamilton ] . in addition , the relation between the @xmath102correlation functions and those that appear in the standard formalism can be expressed as @xmath103+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{qq}[j^q ] \frac{\delta}{\delta q}},\label{fomp}\ ] ] whereas the corresponding mixed @xmath104correlation function can be written as @xmath105=\frac{\delta}{\delta j^q_{i}}\left.\left(\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta\dot{q}_{j } } \right)\right\vert_{q_m\to\frac{\delta\mathcal{w}}{\delta j^{q}}+\frac{\hbar}{i}\frac{\delta}{\delta j^{q}}}.\label{mix}\ ] ] by using the chain rule @xmath106 , eq . ( [ mix ] ) can also be given in the form @xmath107=\delta_{il}^{qq}\frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{q}_l } \left(\left.\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta\dot{q}_j } \right\vert_{q\to\bar{q}[j^q]+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{qq}[j^q ] \frac{\delta}{\delta q}}\right ) = \delta_{il}^{qq } \frac{\delta { \bar p}_j}{\delta { \bar q}_l}. \label{fopp}\ ] ] the other mixed correlator @xmath108 can be immediately inferred from the bosonic nature of the fields , @xmath109 . similarly , it is possible to determine the connected three point correlation functions @xmath110&=&\delta_{il}^{qq}\frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{q}_l}\delta_{jk}^{pp},\\ \delta_{ijk}^{qqp}[j^{q}]&=&\delta_{im}^{qq}\delta_{jl}^{qq}\left \{\frac{\delta^3\gamma}{\delta\bar{q}_l\delta\bar{q}_m\delta\bar{q}_n } \delta_{nk}^{qp}+\frac{\delta^2\bar{p}_k}{\delta\bar{q}_m\delta\bar{q}_l } \right\},\nonumber \\ \label{fopp1}\\ \delta_{ijk}^{ppp}[j^{q}]&=&i\delta_{ij}\bar{p}_k+i\delta_{ik}\bar{p}_j + i\delta_{jk}\bar{p}_i+\nonumber\\&+&i^2\left.\left(\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0 } { \delta \dot{q}_{i}}\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta\dot{q}_{j } } \frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta\dot{q}_{k}}\right ) \right\vert_{q\to\bar{q}[j^q]+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{qq}[j^q ] \frac{\delta}{\delta q}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the last expression we have used the previous results . employing eqs . ( [ fopp ] ) and eq . ( [ fopp1 ] ) the first and second derivatives of @xmath111 with respect to @xmath98 can be expressed as functionals of the remaining elements . in this way the vacuum expectation value of @xmath42 can be expanded . in fact , up to second order in the classical field it reads @xmath112\bar{q}_i\bar{q}_j \nonumber\\ & + & \ldots \ , .\label{mepn}\end{aligned}\ ] ] since @xmath113 can be computed using the procedure detailed above , the expression ( [ mepn ] ) determines @xmath111 as a function of the second - order dressed correlation functions . the determination of the proper functions within the canonical formalism as a functional of those appearing in the standard lagrange framework is rather cumbersome . this task involves connected tensors of rank larger than two and depends on the possibility to invert the propagator @xmath114 . once the individual elements of this propagator are computed , the proper two - point function is completely determined in terms of the elements of the lagrange formalism . in case the external sources associated to the @xmath85fields vanish , the inverse of @xmath115 is the proper green s function that arises in the standard path integral representation . by direct inversion of the @xmath116 block matrix one obtains @xmath117 where @xmath118 and @xmath119 according to eq . ( [ generalg ] ) there are several equivalent representations of the latter expression , _ e.g. _ @xmath120 however , in what follows we will consider the most simple form given by @xmath121 where we have introduced a unity in the form @xmath122 in eq . ( [ shrepr ] ) , and furthermore the expressions for the off - diagonal elements of eq.([generalg ] ) have been used . the method to obtain @xmath123 can be generalized to any proper @xmath1point function . for instance , let us suppose that we want to compute the proper three - point function . we denote it as @xmath124 and the correspondingly connected version as @xmath125 by considering the action of the symbolic functional derivative @xmath126 on eq . ( [ unidad ] ) we get the equation @xmath127 by inversion of @xmath114 in the second term we obtain the desired form for the proper 3-point green s function @xmath128 proceeding in an analogous way it is possible to express the proper four - point green s function @xmath129 , and so on . thereby , the number of variables within the first order formalism can be reduced . from that point of view , the initially cumbersome problem becomes simpler . let us now return to the symmetry identity . to this end we write eq . ( [ slavnov ] ) in the following form @xmath130\left\{j^q_{m}\delta q_m\left[\frac{\hbar}{i } \frac{\delta}{\delta j^p},q\right]+j^p_{m}\delta p_m\left[\frac{\hbar}{i } \frac{\delta}{\delta j^p},q\right]\right\}\nonumber\\ & \times & \int \mathcal{d}[p]\exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}i[\phi , j]\right ] . \label{importanteqq}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in order to simplify the following analysis let us consider theories where the transformations are linear in the momentum fields . under this condition and restricting to the class of hamiltonians analyzed so far we obtain @xmath130\left\{j^q_{m}\delta q_m\left[j^p+ \frac{\delta \mathcal{s}_0}{\delta \dot{q}},q\right ] \right . \nonumber\\ & & + \left.j^p_{m}\delta p_m\left[j^p+\frac{\delta \mathcal{s}_0}{\delta \dot{q}},q\right]\right\}\exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}\tilde{\mathcal{s}}[q , j ] \right].\label{importanteqqq}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in particular , if @xmath131 we find that the action @xmath78 is invariant under a symmetry transformation @xmath132 which is a functional of @xmath41 only , _ i.e. _ a symmetry transformation @xmath133 \to \delta q_m \left [ q \right]$ ] . the structure of eq . ( [ importanteqqq ] ) allows to write the symmetry identities in a similar form to eq . ( [ comparar1 ] ) and eq . ( [ comparar2 ] ) , @xmath134\right.\\ & & + \,\frac{\delta\gamma^h}{\delta \bar{q}_m } \left.\!\delta q_m\!\left[\frac{\delta \mathcal{s}_0}{\delta \dot{q}}\!-\!\frac{\delta \gamma^h}{\delta \bar{p}},q\right]\right\}_{\phi\to \bar{\phi}[j]+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{\phi\phi}[j]\frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{\phi}}}. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] this concludes the formal discussion of the functional symmetry identities . a complete derivation , especially for constrained systems as coulomb gauge yang - mills theories , is presented below in sect . [ sec : coulomb ] . in this section we will show how a general proper correlation function in the lagrange formalism can be decomposed into correlation functions in the hamilton approach . so far we have presented the formalism for a general field theory . in the present and forthcoming sections we will restrict ourselves to the most important class of renormalizable field theories . in four dimensions the most general renormalizable `` canonical action '' for a pure bosonic theory can be expressed as a functional taylor expansion , @xmath135&=&i_{0ji}^{qp}p_iq_j+\frac{1}{2}i_{0ij}^{pp}p_ip_j+ \frac{1}{2}i_{0ijk}^{pqq}p_iq_jq_k \nonumber\\ & + & \frac{1}{2}i_{0ij}^{qq}q_iq_j + \frac{1}{3!}i_{0ijk}^{qqq}q_iq_jq_k+ \frac{1}{4!}i_{0ijkl}^{qqqq}q_iq_jq_kq_l \ , .\nonumber\\ \label{can - action}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath136 is such that @xmath137 clearly , the coefficients @xmath138 are field independent . they are given by the functional derivatives of @xmath54 evaluated at @xmath139 namely @xmath140 we remark that @xmath141 as well @xmath142 are dimensionless tensor couplings whereas @xmath143 and @xmath144 have mass dimension @xmath145 and @xmath146 , respectively , and do not involve time derivatives of the fields . nevertheless , depending on the assumed theory the latter two might depend on @xmath147 and @xmath148 . we are considering bosonic theories , so that all coefficients are symmetric . in particular , the first term in eq.([acv ] ) can be written as @xmath149 where @xmath150 which leads to the functional relation @xmath151 we can identify the coefficients present in the hamiltonian density eq.([hamiltoniand1 ] ) as @xmath152 and @xmath153 substituting eqs . ( [ ceff1 ] ) and ( [ ceff2 ] ) in eq . ( [ act ] ) and collecting the terms of the same order in @xmath41 we get that the action @xmath78 can be written as a polynomial functional , @xmath154 in this context the following relations between the bare coefficients arise @xmath155 @xmath156 @xmath157 substituting the above equations in eq . ( [ a ] ) and considering the relation given by eq . ( [ dothg ] ) allows to find additional relations . in fact , taking the second , third and fourth functional derivatives of @xmath78 and evaluating at @xmath158 , respectively , we obtain @xmath159 @xmath160 @xmath161 @xmath162 in the last two relations we have introduced @xmath163 denoting a partial functional differentiation acting just on those terms in the action that do not involve the time derivative of the field . to complete our analysis we point out that from eq . ( [ cvbr ] ) the general form of the quantum canonical momentum fields in four - dimensional renormalizable theories is given by @xmath164 as these polynomial representations allow to identify a priori the bare elements , the expansions given above prove to be very convenient to derive the dses for a general bosonic theory in both formulations . the relations between the correlation functions in both formulations will be given in the following via explicit diagrammatic expressions . to enable this , we will first introduce a graphical representation in terms of the fundamental objects that characterize the theory in both formulations . * as before we consider fields that involve all the irreducible representations in the theory . the fundamental fields are represented by solid lines whereas the corresponding momentum fields are denoted by zigzag lines . + * dressed propagators are denoted by thick , whereas bare propagators and external lines by thin lines , respectively . off - diagonal propagator components are represented by a thick , half solid and half zigzag line . + + to keep the representation of the dses in the first order formalism concise we also include the matrix propagator eq . ( [ cpro ] ) represented by a double line . + * all proper correlation functions ( including proper 2-point functions ) in the first and second order formalism are denoted by small and large filled blobs , + + whereas bare vertex functions are represented by open blobs . + * in our analysis it will become useful to introduce the inverse proper momentum 2-point function @xmath165 which will be represented by a thick dotted line . since it has the form of an alternative momentum propagator it can connect as an internal momentum line to proper vertices . similarly all connected correlators which are one - particle - irreducible ( 1pi ) in the fields but merely connected via the `` propagator '' @xmath166 are called _ p - connected _ and are denoted by a blob labeled by a p. + to express proper functions in the lagrange formalism in terms of those of the hamilton formalism , we exploit the underlying equivalence between the first and second order formalism . due to the equivalence of the generating functionals of connected green s functions at vanishing sources @xmath95 , the effective actions in the two formalisms are identical when @xmath167 is a functional of @xmath168 which in turn is implicitly given by the stationarity in @xmath167 , @xmath169\equiv\gamma^h\left[\bar{p}(\bar{q}),\bar{q}\right ] \label{equivalenciaquantica}\ \ \mathrm{whenever}\ \ \frac{\delta \gamma^h}{\delta\bar{p}}=-j^p=0.\ ] ] here @xmath170 still depends explicitly on @xmath171 and @xmath111 , where the quantum average of the momentum fields is in general a complicated functional of the fundamental field . any proper @xmath0-point function in the standard formalism can be determined by taking @xmath0 derivatives with respect to the fields in eq . ( [ equivalenciaquantica ] ) and evaluated at the vacuum expectation value . in particular applying the chain rule and eq.([equivalenciaquantica ] ) the first derivative reads @xmath172 in the above defined graphical representation this equation reads . as usual in the standard formalism , a differentiation with respect to a field is equivalent to attaching an external leg in the graphical representation ( _ cf . , e.g. , _ ref . next we consider the second derivative of the action given by @xmath173 the field derivative of the momentum field can alternatively to the previous result ( [ mepn ] ) also be obtained from a field derivative of the constraint equation in eq . ( [ equivalenciaquantica ] ) , @xmath174 inserting this in eq . ( [ fundamenta2 ] ) it is expressed entirely in terms of proper first order green s functions and takes the symmetric form @xmath175 in accordance with eq . ( [ shreprqq ] ) . the above equation yields the graphical representation of the decomposition of the proper two - point green s function . interestingly , in terms of the first order correlation functions there is in addition to the proper part also a connected contribution due to the fact that the fundamental field mixes with the corresponding momentum field . this is evident from the off - diagonal elements eq . ( [ mix ] ) in the propagator matrix in the first order formalism . due to the mixing the arising propagator in eq . ( [ complementary1 ] ) is not the elementary @xmath42-propagator but the propagator for a collective mode described by the inverse of the proper two - point momentum correlation function @xmath166 which is represented by the dotted line and related to the actual momentum propagator via eq . ( [ ppifg ] ) . the result for the fundamental field derivative of a proper correlation function in the hamilton formalism yields the replacement rule . in the next step a field derivative can also act on the propagator @xmath166 . its derivative is obtained from the derivative of the inverse of an operator as @xmath176 which yields the graphical replacement rule . applying these two replacement rules in all possible ways on the right hand side of the above equation for the two - point vertex provides immediately the corresponding decomposition of the proper 3-point vertex . this yields directly a symmetric result , whereas the computation without the replacement eq . ( [ complementary1 ] ) in each step would produce an asymmetric result involving higher derivatives of @xmath111 . to derive the decomposition of higher order lagrange correlation functions it is useful to note that both of the above replacement rules involve the external legs in the form of the composite expression denoted by a dashed line . by introducing the composite external leg into the graphical representation , the decomposition of the 3-point function is given by a single graph with three of these new external legs . via the previous rules it is easy to obtain a corresponding replacement rule for the composite external leg . thereby the extension of a general @xmath0-point function by an additional leg can be obtained from the simplified set of rules in fig . [ fig : rules ] . , scaledwidth=20.0% ] starting from the 3-point function these rules allow to derive the decomposition of arbitrary proper @xmath0-point functions in the lagrange formalism . in the appendix we show that the graphs generated by these replacement rules have a very simple structure that can be summarized by the following general statement : _ a proper @xmath0-point function in the lagrange formalism can be decomposed into the sum of all @xmath42-connected @xmath0-point functions with composite external legs in the hamilton framework . _ this is shown in graphical form in fig . [ fig : lag - dec ] . the graphical representation manifestly shows that the propagation , decay and dispersion of particles are more complicated when analyzed in the hamilton framework . at the tree level the arising propagators @xmath166 are constant and correspondingly the dotted internal lines between the proper vertices represent merely contact terms . similarly the external leg corrections involve no additional poles at tree level and the explicit energy dependence arising from the mixed correlator in eq . ( [ complementary1 ] ) just cancels the one from the momentum field derivative of the initial vertex . in the fully dressed action , however , there could arise additional poles due to the actual propagation of the momentum fields via higher order kinetic terms , as well as an explicit energy dependence of the terms that cancels only after summing over all contributions . via graphical rules , one can therefore generate in a systematical way the connection between any proper green s function in the standard second - order formalism to the appropriate correlation functions in the first - order formalism . we point out already here that the inverse relations for green s functions in the latter context are more complicated and can involve loops related to connected correlation functions with both mixed and pure momentum fields . the method used in the last section allows us to represent them in terms of those appearing in the lagrange formalism . as already mentioned we will consider for completeness also quantum field theories involving grassmannian fields @xmath177 and @xmath178 fulfilling the anti - commutation rules @xmath179 the grassmannian action for a renormalizable theory in four dimensions has the general form @xmath180 the quantum canonical momentum fields associated to the @xmath177 are given by @xmath181 , where the suffix _ r _ denotes differentiation from the right . it is clear that the usual path integral representation for grassmannian field is already of first - order form since the momentum fields are treated as independent variables . _ purely fermionic correlation functions are therefore trivially identical in the two formulations . _ let us now study mixed correlation functions involving bosonic fields represented by the @xmath182 in eq . ( [ fp2 ] ) when the bosonic path integral is written in the canonical form as well . generally the tensors @xmath183 @xmath184 and @xmath185 are real and field independent . the kinetic tensor reads in particular @xmath186 where @xmath187 since it is a bosonic variable , @xmath111 is a functional of fermionic bilinears @xmath188 and the field @xmath98 . as a consequence the second term in eq . ( [ fundamenta2 ] ) vanishes identically , which confirms the equality of the propagators in both formulations @xmath189 analogous to the bosonic case the three - point vertex can be decomposed as @xmath190 although the propagators are the same in both formulations the vertices can be different . the above chain rule again results in the appearance of composite legs for all bosons in the graphical representation . the decomposition of a general @xmath0-point correlation function is then again given by all p - connected graphs where only the bosonic propagators @xmath166 are involved and only bosonic external legs are composite . so far we gave in subsection [ gen - ham - con ] general expressions for correlation functions in the hamilton formalism . the goal in this section is to evaluate the general decomposition of the two - point functions in the hamilton framework in case of a generic four - dimensional renormalizable quantum field theory in terms of lagrange correlation functions . to do this , we start by computing the elements of @xmath191 by considering eq . ( [ fopp ] ) and eq . ( [ gqcm ] ) the mixed connected two - point function in the first order formalism can be written as ( from now on we skip the explicit factor @xmath192 ) @xmath193 using partial differentiation for the identity @xmath194 we obtain @xmath195 and therefore in configuration space @xmath196 where eq . ( [ lamarmotadormida ] ) and eq . ( [ lamarmota ] ) have been used . according to the diagrammatic representation the above function has the decomposition given in fig . [ fig : mixed - dec ] . , scaledwidth=47.0% ] via the bosonic symmetry of the propagator it is easy to see that @xmath197 clearly , eq . ( [ qppp ] ) and eq . ( [ pppq ] ) fulfill the condition @xmath198 . our convention for the fourier transform of a general two - point function ( connected or proper ) obeying translational invariance is @xmath199 with @xmath200 and @xmath201 . as a consequence of this convention and the equivalence @xmath198 we obtain the relation @xmath202 where @xmath203 and @xmath204 represent the remaining internal indices . this yields the corresponding equation in momentum space @xmath205 in the derivation of the latter equation we have taken into account the fourier transformation of the proper 3-point function @xmath206 where the @xmath207function expresses the momentum conservation . the pure @xmath102correlator can be computed using eqs . ( [ fomp ] ) and ( [ gqcm ] ) . neglecting those terms that will eventually vanish when the sources are set to zero , it reads @xmath208.\end{aligned}\ ] ] by iterated application of eq . ( [ const ] ) and considering eqs.([lamarmotadormida ] ) and ( [ lamarmota ] ) this expression yields @xmath209 here we have already suppressed disconnected expressions involving tadpoles that cancel since eq . ( [ mge11 ] ) gives @xmath210 the graphical representation of the decomposition of the momentum propagator in the hamilton framework is shown in fig . [ fig : mom - dec ] . note that the loop graphs in the first line represent precisely the vacuum graphs of the @xmath0-particle irreducible ( @xmath0pi ) actions in the lagrange formalism of order one and two with attached external @xmath42-legs . in addition to these proper contributions this result involves again connected graphs in the second line . these graphs correspond to the second and third line in eq . ( [ ppexpf ] ) which can alternatively be expressed by the known mixed correlation functions derived in the last subsection as @xmath211 and correspondingly represented as a single graph . after fourier transformation of eq . ( [ ppexpf ] ) we find the representation of @xmath212 in momentum space @xmath213 the summation over all field components indicated by the subindices in eq . ( [ sadad ] ) ( see also eq . ( [ ppexpf ] ) ) leads to multiple possibilities . yet many of these might not be allowed due to the symmetries of the theory . the decomposition of higher order functions involving one or two external momentum fields is simply obtained by further derivatives of these generating equations . via the chain rule a derivative w.r.t . to the source can be transformed into a derivative with respect to the averaged fields yielding in addition external propagators . correspondingly the graphical decomposition of such correlation functions can be obtained recursively via the graphical replacement rules in the lagrange framework given in @xcite . on the other hand , from eq . ( [ mge ] ) it is clear that higher order correlation functions involving @xmath0 momentum fields involve graphs of loop order @xmath0 . therefore it is not possible to give a close result for all @xmath0-point functions . to conclude this section we remark that the multiplication of @xmath214 on the left hand side amputates the green s function @xmath215 according to eq . ( [ mepn ] ) , this operation allows to derive @xmath216 considering this expression and the diagrammatic rules in the standard path integral representation we get @xmath217 which can be represented graphically as we note in passing , that similar to the composite collective propagator and composite leg in the last section this `` vertex '' allows to write the graphs in the first line by a single loop graph . yet , here this is then surely no explicit decomposition in terms of second order correlation functions anymore . while in the context of the canonical formulation it is entirely possible to deduce the complete set of dses directly from eqs . ( [ mge12]-[sppdeqqqpr ] ) we will follow a slightly less obvious path here . we proceed to give the diagrammatic and analytic expressions for the proper propagators , typically the ones of the first order formalism . subsequently , we will show that such representations can be encoded into the usual ones , _ i.e. _ eqs . ( [ mge12]-[sppdeqqqpr ] ) , which then completes the proof of equivalence between both types of derivations . the result given by eq . ( [ generalg ] ) allows to analyze the structure of the inverse propagator . by considering the fourier transformation of this equation we find that @xmath218 the presence of the second term in eq . ( [ ftpp ] ) leads to the cancelation of the corresponding term in eq . ( [ ppexpf ] ) . the complete analytic result when inserting the corresponding expressions is rather lengthy and therefore deferred to appendix [ app : exp - form ] . it involves the inverse of sums of different terms . graphically these expressions are represented in fig.[fig.proper ] . for a clearer presentation the subsequent correlation functions are represented in terms of the previous ones . whereas the actual momentum propagator can only be given as an inverse and thereby by an infinite number of graphs , the `` alternative propagator '' @xmath166 , that featured prominently in the decomposition of lagrange correlation functions , is given by a finite number of graphs in terms of second order functions and differs from the ordinary one by the absence of the connected pieces in fig.[fig.proper ] . for a field theory without a three - point interaction vertex involving the time derivative of the fields , one has @xmath219 , and eq . ( [ generalg ] ) reduces to @xmath220 this simplified expression holds for theories like qed and/or self - interacting @xmath221theory , where the vacuum expectation value of the momentum field is completely determined in terms of @xmath41 , @xmath222 . actually , the expressions for @xmath223 , @xmath224 and @xmath225 in eq . ( [ generalgk ] ) encode a more general result because they could be obtained using eq . ( [ mge12 ] ) and eq . ( [ mge13 ] ) without setting variables to zero . as a consequence they show that dressed proper functions involving more than two external momentum legs are not present in such theories . this means that the mass and the coupling constant receive no contribution coming from the higher order corrections besides the usual ones given in the standard framework . on the other hand the absence of quantum corrections to @xmath226 @xmath224 , and @xmath225 means that only wave - function renormalization contributes to these kinetic terms . as in the present framework the quantum corrections to the propagators and vertices depend in general on temporal derivatives this shows that within the standard formalism there are several pieces in the effective action that depend on the time derivative of the averaged field . as a consequence , the canonical momentum fields defined on the level of the effective action differ from those given by the quantum average of @xmath42 since the involved limiting processes do not commute . although the decomposition of proper hamilton functions given above involves inversions that can not be omitted in terms of second order correlation functions it is possible to transform these equations into a form where such matrix inversions are eliminated . this is done by explicitly introducing first order correlation functions on the right hand side again . as we will show in this subsection , this leads precisely to the first order dses . we start from eq . ( [ 3dpqq ] ) and use it to express @xmath223 as @xmath227^{-1}.\label{newrpp}\ ] ] the multiplication of @xmath228 from the left hand side allows to write the above equation as @xmath229\gamma_{sj}^{pp}=-\delta_{ij},\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where eq . ( [ fopp1 ] ) has been taken into account . the introduction of a @xmath230 as @xmath231 in the last term in the bracket and the use of eq . ( [ fopp1 ] ) makes it possible to express the above relation in the following form @xmath232 which can be translated to @xmath233 this presents the dse for the proper momentum 2-point correlation function . it is possible to obtain a similar equation for the @xmath234propagator : @xmath235^{-1 } \nonumber\\ & & \quad \times \left(i_{0lj}^{pq } - \frac{i}{2}i_{0luk}^{pqq}\delta_{um}^{qq } \gamma_{mjn}^{qqq}\delta_{nk}^{qq}\right ) . \label{sofr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the multiplication of @xmath228 from the right hand side allows to rewrite eq . ( [ sofr ] ) as @xmath236 this can be rewritten in the following form @xmath237 the introduction of a @xmath230 as @xmath231 in the first and second term inside the brackets allows to write this as @xmath238 by considering eq . ( [ shrepr ] ) we get @xmath239 which yields the result @xmath240 we remark that the last terms of eqs . ( [ sombra111 ] ) and ( [ sombra222 ] ) include several combinations of fundamental and momentum fields . the relations given by eq.([sombra111 ] ) and eq . ( [ sombra222 ] ) are the dses of the proper @xmath241- and @xmath242-propagators expressed in terms of the usual elements of the canonical formulation . it is straightforward to prove that eq . ( [ sombra111 ] ) coincides with the corresponding equation derived using eq . ( [ mge12 ] ) and eq . ( [ gqcm ] ) . this is different for eq . ( [ sombra222 ] ) . in fact , as discussed previously , we could in principle calculate these propagators from eq . ( [ sppdeqqqpr ] ) , nevertheless by considering the action eq . ( [ a ] ) and the relations between the bare elements we find that the structure is more cumbersome than that given in eq . ( [ sombra222 ] ) . instead , the latter one is in correspondence with eq . ( [ mge13 ] ) via the symmetry relation @xmath243 in case both @xmath98 and @xmath111 are bosonic fields . the fact that we recover the standard first order propagator dses from the decomposition of proper hamilton correlation functions has its origin in the equivalence between the canonical and lagrange equations of motion at the quantum level . in appendix [ motion - equivalence ] it is shown that whenever they describe the same dynamical processes , the dses derived from them will be equivalent too . however , as we argued in the last subsection , the classical canonical momentum fields defined from the effective action and those given by the quantum average of @xmath42 are not the same . this means that the equations expressed in term of @xmath111 and @xmath98 do not correspond to the classical canonical ones . based on this statement , the derivation of @xmath244 is considerably simpler using eq . ( [ sppdeqqq ] ) than via the procedure performed in the last two cases . indeed , by considering eqs . ( [ gqcm ] ) and ( [ a ] ) as well as the relations between the bare elements , we arrive at @xmath245_{q\to \bar{q}+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{q\phi } \frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{\phi } } } .\label{tdasd}\end{aligned}\ ] ] now , in order to give the explicit form of @xmath244 , we rewrite eq . ( [ tdasd ] ) as @xmath246-\frac{i}{2}i_{0ijk}^{qqq}\delta_{jk}^{qq}[j]\nonumber\\ & -&\frac{1}{6}i_{0ijkl}^{qqqq}\delta_{jm}^{q\phi}[j]\delta_{ku}^{q\phi}[j ] \gamma_{mun}^{\phi\phi\phi}[\bar{q},\bar{p}]\delta_{nl}^{\phi q}[j_q ] \nonumber\\ & -&\frac{i}{2}i_{0ijkl}^{qqqq}\bar{q}_j\delta_{kl}^{qq}[j].\end{aligned}\ ] ] taking the functional derivative with respect to @xmath98 and setting the vacuum expectation values of the fundamental fields to zero we get @xmath247 the fourier transformation of eqs . ( [ sombra111 ] ) , ( [ sombra222 ] ) and ( [ ph4vt ] ) yields finally the corresponding dses in momentum space @xmath248 @xmath249 @xmath250 we show the graphical representation of the complete set of dses in fig.[f1 ] where for conciseness we use the matrix propagator which yields all possible loop graphs involving physical vertices in accordance with the symmetries of the action as a consequence of the implied summation over repeated indices . before we come to the main application of the developed formalism in the context of coulomb gauge qcd , we will show in this section that the above derived results also apply to theories involving auxiliary fields , _ i.e. _ the typical treatment of such theories represent a special case of the discussion presented here . however , it is not the kinetic but the interaction terms which are linearized . in the case of fermionic theories this is also referred to as bosonization @xcite . the action is by construction only quadratic in the auxiliary fields and lacks kinetic terms for them . therefore , as we detail below the above described analysis directly applies and gives general relations between correlation functions in the fundamental theory and the linearized form involving auxiliary fields . we will illustrate this in the case of fermionic theories with non - renormalizable , quartic interactions . examples for this class of theories are the nambu@xmath251jona - lasinio model @xcite or the bcs theory of superconductivity @xcite . the functional integral is given by @xmath252 with the lagrangian containing local quartic interactions @xmath253 here the @xmath254 are dirac matrices . the linearization of the fermionic interaction can be performed by formally introducing a one of the form @xmath255 into the fermionic path integral , where this path integral over @xmath256 enforces a functional @xmath257-function that allows to rewrite the non - linear fermionic interaction in terms of @xmath258 . integrating then over the @xmath258 yields the path integral of the corresponding linear sigma model @xmath259 where we have introduced additional sources for the auxiliary fields @xmath256 . after this bosonization procedure the lagrangian of the corresponding `` linear @xmath260-model '' reads @xmath261 where @xmath262 . here , there is , in contrast to the first order formalism , by construction no mixing between the fundamental and the auxiliary fields . analogous to eq . ( [ equivalenciaquantica ] ) the effective actions of the two theories are again identical at vanishing sources @xmath263 @xmath264=\gamma_\sigma[{\bar \psi}^\dagger , \bar \psi,\bar \sigma_i[{\bar \psi}^\dagger,\bar \psi]]\ ] ] where the auxiliary fields are implicitly given by @xmath265 via the chain rule of functional differentiation we obtain analogous expressions for eqs . ( [ opstart])-([propder ] ) with @xmath266 replaced by @xmath267 , respectively . correspondingly , the same graphical rules apply . with the simplification that there can be no mixing due to the different statistics of the fields , the external legs are not composite and the arising inverse 2-point function is the ordinary @xmath260-propagator . denoting as before connected correlation functions that are 1pi with respect to the fundamental fields and connected in the auxiliary fields as _ @xmath260-connected _ , this leads to the analogous general result : _ a proper @xmath0-point function in the fundamental theory can be decomposed into the sum of all @xmath260-connected @xmath0-point functions in the linearized theory . _ in particular the decomposition of the proper 4-fermion vertex in the fundamental theory eq . ( [ fermact ] ) reads where we represent in an analogous way the proper vertices in the fundamental and linearized theory by large and small blobs and the ordinary @xmath260-propagator by the dotted line . this result confirms a well - known fact , namely , that no double - counting occurs in the linearized theory although the original fermion field and the auxiliary bosonic field are employed both . this redundancy in the description can also be prevented from the outset by partial re - bosonization @xcite in the context of the functional renormalization group . in this approach the contribution of the fundamental degrees of freedeom is entirely absorbed into the bosonized interactions even at the level of the effective action . since the lagrangian of the linearized theory is at most quadratic and lacks kinetic terms for the @xmath260-fields by construction , these fields can be trivially integrated out retaining their sources at this point . this leads to an analogous expression to eq . ( [ mge ] ) for the correlation function of @xmath0 auxiliary fields @xmath268 after the sources are set to their vacuum expectation value . due to the absence of 3-point interactions and mixing , the decomposition of the auxiliary @xmath260-propagator is again simplified compared to the result given in fig . [ fig : mom - dec ] , where the different prefactors of the loop correction arise due to the fermionic nature of the fields . in contrast to the decomposition of the hamilton propagators there is no difference between proper and connected 2-point functions in the case of the auxiliary field due to the absence of mixing , and the proper correlation functions is simply the inverse of the above equation . this concludes the demonstration of the developed formalism to the case of theories with auxiliary fields . as detailed in the introduction the main motivation for developing the presented formalism is given by the fact that the first order formalism might be better suited for non - perturbative studies of coulomb gauge yang - mills theory . as a first step into this direction we will apply the formalism developed so far to give the explicit relations between the two - point correlation functions of the transversal and longitudinal components of the conjugate momentum to the ones of the gauge field . the starting point is the hamiltonian density of coulomb gauge yang - mills theory : @xmath269 where @xmath270 is the part of the hamiltonian density of pure yang - mills theory @xmath271 here , @xmath272 represents the chromomagnetic field , @xmath273 the time - component of the gluon field , whereas @xmath274 is the covariant derivative in the adjoint representation , with the structure constants @xmath275 of the color - group @xmath276 , and @xmath277 denotes the gauge coupling . on the other hand , @xmath278 is the piece of the hamiltonian density related to gauge fixing terms . above @xmath279 is the conjugate momentum of the gauge field @xmath280 @xmath281 and @xmath282 are the grassmann - valued faddeev - popov ghost fields introduced by fixing the gauge , and @xmath283 is a colored " lagrange multiplier field . note that the `` canonical action '' in the present case is given by @xmath284 it is remarkable that the ghost sector of the hamiltonian is fully disconnected from @xmath285 by identification of @xmath286 the above `` action '' can be written as a functional taylor expansion involving a pure bosonic piece like eq . ( [ can - action ] ) and one containing the ghost field as eq . ( [ fp2 ] ) . this fact allows therefore to use the general expressions derived so far . except for the inverse , bare ghost two - point function @xmath287 the remaining inverse tree level propagators of the theory are presented in table [ tab : w1 ] . note that @xmath54 involves four - vertices that have the following form in momentum space @xmath288,\\ i_{0ijlm}^{abcd(aaaa ) } & = & -g^2\left\{\delta_{ij}\delta_{lm}\left[f^{ace}f^{bde}-f^{ade}f^{cbe}\right ] \right.\nonumber\\ & & + \delta_{il}\delta_{jm}\left[f^{abe}f^{cde}-f^{ade}f^{bce}\right]\nonumber\\ & & + \left.\delta_{im}\delta_{jl}\left[f^{ace}f^{dbe}-f^{abe}f^{cde}\right ] \right\},\qquad\end{aligned}\ ] ] with all momenta defined as incoming . the decomposition of the conjugate momentum into transverse and longitudinal parts , @xmath289 , makes it convenient to study the required complete cancellation of the energy divergences @xcite that emerge in a perturbative treatment of coulomb gauge yang - mills theory . certainly , such a decomposition increases the number of fields of the theory and leads to @xmath290 where @xmath291 is a colored langrange multiplier field which appears via the transversality condition of @xmath292 in this context , the general structure of the connected two - point functions is given in table [ tab : w2 ] . the latter may be found independent of any approximation but based solely on the principles of brst invariance , spatial and time - reversal symmetries and transversality properties of the vector propagators . each dressing function @xmath293 is a dimensionless scalar function of @xmath294 and @xmath295 except the ghost propagator @xmath296 depending only on @xmath295 . the tree - level propagators are obtained when @xmath297 for a complete description , the reader is referred to ref . @xcite . the general results of the preceeding sections can in principle directly applied to coulomb gauge qcd as well by decomposing the momentum field into its individual components . however , since the longitudinal momentum field features more complicated bare correlation functions that involve additional derivative operators we derive the corresponding expressions of subsection [ gen - ham - con ] once more taking now the general action ( [ gac ] ) into account . to this end we first have to relate the bare momentum correlation functions with the corresponding ones for the individual momentum components . we formally express the decomposition via a the operator @xmath298 @xmath299 expanded in a local series in terms of the individual momentum components the general canonical action takes the form @xmath300=i_{0ji}^{qp}\pi_iq_j+\frac{1}{2}i_{0ij}^{pp}\pi_i\pi_j+ \frac{1}{2}i_{0ijk}^{pqq}\pi_iq_jq_k\\ & & \quad+i_{0ji}^{qp}\mathcal{x}_{il}\omega_l q_j\nonumber+ \frac{1}{2}\mathcal{x}_{il}i_{0ij}^{pp}\mathcal{x}_{jk}\omega_l\omega_k+ \frac{1}{2}i_{0ijk}^{pqq}\mathcal{x}_{il}\omega_l q_jq_k\\ & & \quad+\frac{1}{2}i_{0ij}^{qq}q_iq_j + \frac{1}{3!}i_{0ijk}^{qqq}q_iq_jq_k+ \frac{1}{4!}i_{0ijkl}^{qqqq}q_iq_jq_kq_l \nonumber \label{can - action2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath301 the above expression yields for the transverse tree level correlators @xmath302 and @xmath303 as well as analogously for the longitudinal expressions @xmath304 @xmath305 and @xmath306 the gaussian integration over @xmath307 yields @xmath308=\mathcal{s}_0+\frac{1}{2}j^\pi_ij^\pi_i + j^\pi_i\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta \dot{q}_i } \nonumber \\ & & + i_{0ji}^{q\omega}\omega_iq_j+\frac{1}{2}\omega_ji_{oij}^{\omega\omega } \omega_i+\frac{1}{2}i_{0ijk}^{\omega qq}\omega_i q_jq_k \nonumber \\ & & + j_i^{\omega}\omega_i + j_i^{q}q_i \label{can - actionvar}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath78 is given by eq . @xmath309 and @xmath310 are the corresponding sources associated to the momentum fields . similarly , the subsequent gaussian integration over @xmath311 gives @xmath312&=&\mathcal{s}_0+\frac{1}{2}j^\pi_ij^\pi_i+ j^\pi_i\frac{\delta\mathcal{s}_0}{\delta \dot{q}_i}+j_i^qq_i -\frac{1}{2}j^\omega_i \left(i_{0}^{\omega\omega}\right)_{ij}^{-1}j^\omega_i \!-\ ! j^\omega_i\left(i_{0}^{\omega\omega}\right)_{ij}^{-1}\ ! \left(\!i_{0uj}^{q\omega}q_u+\frac{1}{2}i_{0juk}^{\omega qq}q_uq_k\!\right ) \nonumber \\ & -&\frac{1}{2}i_{0ji}^{q\omega}\left(i_{0}^{\omega\omega}\right)_{il}^{-1 } i_{0ml}^{q\omega}q_jq_m-\frac{1}{2}i_{0ji}^{q\omega}\left(i_{0}^{\omega\omega } \right)_{il}^{-1}i_{0lmu}^{\omega qq } q_jq_mq_u -\frac{1}{8}i_{0imu}^{\omega qq } \left(i_{0}^{\omega\omega}\right)_{ij}^{-1 } i_{0jkl}^{\omega qq } q_mq_uq_lq_k . \nonumber \\ \label{can - actionvar2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] by collecting the terms of the same order in @xmath41 we obtain the bare vertices in the second order formalism in terms of those that arise in the first order formalism . thereby , the master equation for the momentum propagator eq . ( [ fomp ] ) becomes in the case of the @xmath311-field @xmath313\left(i_{0}^{\omega\omega } \right)_{mj}^{-1 } \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] whereas the corresponding mixed version eq . ( [ fopp ] ) is given by @xmath314 here the @xmath41 fields in eqs . ( [ eq : omegaomega ] ) and ( [ eq : omegaq ] ) again have to be replaced by @xmath315+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{qq}[j^q ] \frac{\delta}{\delta q } .\ ] ] the corresponding equations involving the @xmath307 field are identical to eqs . ( [ fomp ] ) and ( [ fopp ] ) . performing the same algebraic steps as in sect . [ sec.con-ham ] yields the corresponding decomposition of the hamilton propagators in coulomb gauge qcd . the result is displayed in diagrammatic form in fig . [ fig : coulomb - decomposition ] , it constitutes the main result of this section . we have also checked the structure of these expressions by an explicit projection of the general equations on the corresponding momentum components in appendix [ app : projection ] . next we will consider the other direction of the connection discussed in sect . [ sec : lagrange - decomposition ] , the one which expresses proper lagrange correlators in terms of hamiltonian ones . this is interesting in the context of coulomb gauge qcd , since in the hamilton framework a complete proof of the renormalizability of the theory seems possible due to explicit cancellations ensured by powerful ward identities @xcite . here again it is the particular definition of the longitudinal momentum that complicates the issue and does not allow to give these equations explicitly . nevertheless , one can easily convince oneself that these equations are given entirely by tree graphs that introduce no additional divergences . therefore , once the renormalizability of the theory in the first order formalism is established , the corresponding connection immediately implies renormalizability of the theory also in the lagrange framework . yet the cancellation mechanism of arising divergences might be far from obvious in the latter framework and could nevertheless prevent simple truncation schemes . c|c c|c c @xmath54 & @xmath316 & @xmath317 & @xmath260 & @xmath318 + ' '' '' @xmath319&@xmath320 & @xmath321&@xmath322 & @xmath323 + @xmath324&@xmath325 & @xmath326&@xmath323&0 + @xmath327&0&@xmath328&@xmath329 & @xmath329 + @xmath330&@xmath328&0&0 & 0 + c|c c|c c|c c & & & & & + @xmath331 & @xmath316 & @xmath332 & @xmath260 & @xmath311 & @xmath318 & @xmath291 + ' '' '' @xmath333&@xmath334 & @xmath335&0&0 & @xmath336&0 + @xmath337&@xmath338 & @xmath339&0&0&0 & @xmath336 + @xmath260&0&0&@xmath340 & @xmath341 & @xmath342&0 + @xmath311&0&0&@xmath341 & @xmath343 & @xmath344&@xmath345 + @xmath318&@xmath346&0&@xmath347 & @xmath348&0&0 + @xmath291&0&@xmath346&0&@xmath345&0&0 + next we consider the functional symmetry identity . the canonical action @xmath54 is brst - invariant , _ i.e. _ invariant under @xmath349,\ \ \delta\lambda^a=0 . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath350 is a grassmannian infinitesimal parameter , whereas @xmath351 on the other hand @xmath352 is the chromoelectric field . note in addition that @xmath353 is some color - singlet constant which in general could be some function of position . by considering the above transformation the slavnov - taylor identity reads @xmath354\ ! \!\int \ ! \ ! d^4x \left\{-\frac{1}{g}\rho^ad^{0ab}c^b+ \frac{1}{g}\vec{j}^a\cdot\vec{d}^{ab}c^b-\frac{1}{g}\lambda^a\eta^a\right . \nonumber\\ & -&\left.\frac{1}{2}f^{abc}\bar{\eta}^ac^bc^c+f^{abc}c^b\left[(1-\alpha ) \vec{p}^c+\alpha\vec{e}^c\right]\cdot\vec{j}_p\right\}\nonumber\\ & \times&\exp\left\{i i_0+ii_s\right\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath355 employing a procedure analogous to the one used in sect . [ sec : srifs ] we obtain @xmath356\ ! \!\int \ ! \ d^4x \left\{-\frac{1}{g}\rho^ad^{0ab}c^b+\frac{1}{g}\vec{j}^a\cdot\vec{d}^{ab}c^b -\frac{1}{g}\lambda^a\eta^a\right.\nonumber\\&-&\left.\frac{1}{2}f^{abc } \bar{\eta}^ac^bc^c+f^{abc}c^b\left[(1-\alpha)\vec{j}_p^c-\vec{e}^c\right ] \cdot\vec{j}_p\right\}\nonumber\\&\times&\exp\left\{i s_0+is_s\right\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath357 $ ] denotes the remaining integration measure of the fields @xmath358 and @xmath260 . expressed in the field strength tensor @xmath359 one has @xmath360 in addition we decompose the source @xmath361 into transversal and longitudinal components . employing this decomposoition the slavnov - taylor identity can be written as @xmath362\int d^4x\left\{-\frac{1}{g}\rho^ad^{0ab}c^b+ \frac{1}{g}\vec{j}^a\cdot\vec{d}^{ab}c^b- \frac{1}{g}\lambda^a\eta^a\right.\\&-&\left . \frac{1}{2}f^{abc}\bar{\eta}^ac^bc^c + f^{abc}c^b(1-\alpha)\left[\vec{j}^\pi_c\cdot\vec{j}^\pi_a+\frac{\vec{\nabla } } { -\nabla^2}j^\omega_c \frac{\vec{\nabla}}{-\nabla^2}j^\omega_a\right]\right . -\left.f^{abc}c^b\left[\vec{e}_t^c\cdot\vec{j}^\pi_a-\vec{e}_l^c \frac{\vec{\nabla}}{-\nabla^2}j^\omega_a\right]\right\}\exp\left\{i s_0+is_s\right\},\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath363 this completes the application of the developed formalism to coulomb gauge yang - mills theory . we conclude with our main result that given a quantum field theory in the context of the first order formalism it is possible to decompose all green s functions in terms of those obtained from the second order formalism and vice versa . whereas proper lagrange correlation functions are given explicitly to all orders and involve only tree graphs involving dressed hamilton correlation functions , the decomposition of hamilton @xmath0-point functions involves loop graphs of loop order @xmath0 . although the structure of the latter equations seems to be somewhat cumbersome , they are still more compact and simple than the usual dses within the hamilton formalism . we have discussed the connection between the hamilton and the lagrange formalism for a general quantum field theory and illustrated the detailed structure of the arising relations in the important case of a generic four - dimensional renormalizable field theory . in accordance with the obtained equations we have argued that in theories where the quantum average of the momentum fields is completely determined as @xmath364 the proper @xmath85propagators receives quantum corrections only via wave - function renormalization . additionally , it has been shown that the canonical momentum fields which can be defined from the effective action and those given by the quantum average of @xmath42 are in general different . as a demonstration of the general nature of the presented formalism we also showed that the results obtained in this paper can also be applied to the case of theories involving auxiliary fields from a linearization of the interaction part of the action . this yields general relations between correlation functions in the fundamental theory and the linearized form involving auxiliary fields . a major difference is that in this case the fundamental and the auxiliary fields do not mix which simplifies the connection considerably . clearly , the determination of green s functions of yang - mills theories in the first order formalism is considerably more complicated as this case , or even when compared to scalar or abelian gauge theories . the presence of a coupling between the gauge fields and their time derivative as well as the subtleties of gauge fixing present major complications . in particular the renormalizability still poses a major challenge . the presented general connection of all green functions in the two formulations implies that no additional divergences arise when going from one to the other . however , what still needs to be shown is that the theory is renormalizable in both formulations once a proof is given for either of them . on the other hand , renormalizing the theory is probably simpler in the first order formalism where energy divergences explicitly cancel . the obtained connections should then help to renormalize the second order theory where numerical calculations are far simpler . a detailed analysis of the renormalizability in coulomb gauge yang - mills theory will therefore be presented in a forthcoming publication . it is our pleasure to thank peter watson for helpful discussions . s. v .- c . is supported by the doktoratskolleg `` hadrons in vacuum , nuclei and stars '' of the austrian science fund ( fwf ) under contract w1203-n08 . k. s. acknowledges support from the fwf under contract m979-n16 , and r. a. from the german research foundation ( dfg ) under contract al 279/5 - 2 . in this appendix we perform the integration over the momentum fields in the vacuum - vacuum transition amplitude in presence of the classical sources . in order to do this , we assume a general quadratic hamiltonian density given by eq.([hamiltoniand1 ] ) . in order to evaluate the gaussian functional integral over the momentum fields we first consider a finite dimensional generating functional @xmath365=\mathcal{n}_j\int_{-\infty}^{\infty } \prod_{j=1}^{n-1 } \ ! \ ! d^4q^j \prod_{j=0}^{n}\ ! \ ! d^4p^j \exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}(\tilde{i}_0-\mathcal{c}+j_q^iq^i)\right].\ ] ] with the momentum field dependent part of the action @xmath366 by completing the squares in the above expression we arrive at @xmath367\mathcal{a}_{ij}^{-1 } \left [ \dot{q}^j-\mathcal{b}^j+j_p^j\right ] , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath368 . by considering the change of the integration variables from @xmath369 to @xmath370 we obtain @xmath365=\tilde{\mathcal{n}}_j\int\prod_{i=1}^{n-1}d^4q^j \exp\left[\frac{i}{\hbar}\tilde{\mathcal{s}}[q , j]\right ] \label{wqe}\ ] ] with @xmath371\ ] ] and @xmath372\ ! & = & \!\mathcal{s}_0[q ] \\ & + & \frac{1}{2}\!j_p^i \mathcal{a}^{-1}_{ij}[q]j_p^j+j_q^i q^i+j_p^i\mathcal{a}^{-1}_{ij}[q ] \!\left(\dot{q}^j\!-\!\mathcal{b}^j[q]\right).\nonumber \label{gac}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , the action @xmath78 can be obtained by considering the limit of @xmath373 $ ] when @xmath374 . explicitly it reads @xmath79=\frac{1}{2}\dot{q}^i\mathcal{a}^{-1}_{ij}[q]\dot{q}^j- \dot{q}^i\mathcal{a}^{-1}_{ij}[q]\mathcal{b}^j[q]-\int d^4x \mathcal{v}[q ] , % \label{act}\ ] ] where @xmath375=-\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{b}^i[q]\mathcal{a}^{-1}_{ij}[q]\mathcal{b}^j[q]+ \mathcal{c}[q].\ ] ] the canonical momentum fields defined as @xmath376\left(\dot{q}^j-\mathcal{b}^j[q]\right)\label{cvbr}\ ] ] allow us to identify and substitute the last term in @xmath377 $ ] by its respective definition , and to eventually obtain the desired form of eq . ( [ actionlf ] ) . in this appendix we prove the statement made in subsection [ sub : proper - decomposition ] that the replacement rules precisely generate the @xmath42-connected correlators . as usual for a statement over the integers this is done by induction . the statement is trivially fulfilled in the case @xmath378 given explicitly before . now let us assume it is fulfilled for all integers @xmath379 and show that this implies its validity for @xmath380 . in the @xmath42-connected diagrams with @xmath0 legs we single out the proper vertex we started the iteration with . this vertex can be connected to other connected clusters so that all arising graphs have the general form here we suppress all external legs and only give their number next to the corresponding vertex . the sum over @xmath381 counts the connected clusters attached to the considered proper vertex which in addition has @xmath382 external legs and the implicitly given sum labeled @xmath383 runs over all ways to distribute the remaining @xmath94 external legs to the @xmath381 indistinguishable connected vertices ( taking into account that a vertex has at least 3 legs ) . next we consider the attachment of an additional external leg via the rules given in fig . [ fig : rules ] , applied in all possible ways . the above representation then goes over to a @xmath380-point function of the following form here the connected cluster with @xmath380 legs in the first class of graphs is labeled by the additional index @xmath384 ( for reduced ) since one of the legs is connected to the @xmath42-propagator instead to a composite external leg . the derivative of this propagator is explicitly present via the second class of graphs . when the new proper vertex is absorbed in the connected cluster , according to the induction assumption ( @xmath385 ) these two terms together precisely yield the full @xmath42-connected vertex with @xmath386 external legs and without the index @xmath384 . since each connected cluster had before already at least two external legs , together with the new one there are now at least three . terms where besides the new external leg there is only one other external leg at a connected cluster are explicitly given by the fourth class of graphs involving a new `` connected cluster '' that consists only of the proper 3-point vertex . finally , the general expression at order @xmath380 contains also graphs where the new external leg is attached to the proper vertex itself , given by the third class of graphs . altogether , the sum of the different classes of graphs precisely yields all necessary graphs at order @xmath380 , which completes the proof . in this appendix we give the complete results for the decomposition of the proper 2-point function in the hamilton formalism in terms of those in the lagrange formalism . we represent the appearing operator inverses in terms of schwinger proper time integrals . the momentum correlation function is given as @xmath387\right\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] whereas the mixed correlation function reads @xmath388\right\}\nonumber\\ & \times & \left\{-ik_0\delta_{lj}- \frac{i}{2}\int\dbar\sigma i_{0fhl}^{qqp}(-\sigma - k,\sigma , k ) \delta_{fg}^{qq}(\sigma+k)\gamma_{gjw}^{qqq}(\sigma+k ,- k,-\sigma ) \delta_{wh}^{qq}(\sigma)\right\}.\label{sofr1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the fundamental field correlation function is finally given by the lengthy expression @xmath389\right\ } \nonumber\\ & \times&\left\{-ik_0\delta_{lj}- \frac{i}{2}\int\dbar\sigma i_{0fhl}^{qqp}(-\sigma - k,\sigma , k ) \delta_{fg}^{qq}(\sigma+k)\gamma_{gjw}^{qqq}(\sigma+k ,- k,-\sigma ) \delta_{wh}^{qq}(\sigma)\right\}.\label{ph42}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in this appendix we derive the dses in the first order formalism directly . in order to do this we compute eq . ( [ sdev ] ) with the canonical action given in eq . ( [ can - action ] ) @xmath390_{\phi_\to \bar{\phi}+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{\phi\phi } \frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{\phi}}}.\label{mty}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can identify the sum of the last two terms inside the bracket as the quantum canonical momentum fields , which allows to write the above relation as eq . ( [ mge11 ] ) . + the substitution of eq . ( [ mty ] ) in eq . ( [ sdeqqq ] ) , allows to write the latter as @xmath391_{\phi\to \bar{\phi}+\frac{\hbar}{i}\delta^{\phi\phi } \frac{\delta}{\delta \bar{\phi}}}\label{gfhs}\ ] ] where @xmath392 and @xmath393 in the last two equations we have used the elementary decomposition of the bare elements and eq . ( [ gqcm ] ) . plugging eqs . ( [ rtyy ] ) and ( [ rty ] ) into eq . ( [ gfhs ] ) we arrive at the dse ( [ tdasd ] ) . defining the transverse projector @xmath394 one has @xmath395 and @xmath396 . as no time derivative appears one can obtain @xmath397 @xmath398 @xmath399 and @xmath400 by projecting @xmath42 in the two - point functions @xmath401 , @xmath402 and @xmath403 . for instance to obtain @xmath404 we decode the result given in eq . ( [ qppp ] ) . let us first identify the fundamental field @xmath41 with index @xmath203 with @xmath405 we then expand the remaining sums over the fields involved in the @xmath41 s considering all possible combinations which generate the bare vertex @xmath406 . the bosonic symmetry of the latter allows to write @xmath407 here no internal propagator like @xmath408 appears since no proper vertex functions with @xmath409derivative exist . the relation between this function and @xmath404 is given by @xmath410 obviously the case corresponding to @xmath411 is obtained by replacing in eq . ( [ qpppvrie ] ) @xmath412 where appropriate and considering the relation @xmath413 note that the sum over @xmath414 in eq . ( [ lachacha ] ) and over @xmath204 in eq . ( [ lachachacha ] ) must be understood over the discrete spatial indices only . the bare greens functions involving the full momentum field can now be expressed by the corresponding expression for the individual components via the explicit expressions given in section [ sec : coulomb ] which results in the equations given in diagrammatic form in fig . [ fig : coulomb - decomposition ] . 99 j. s. schwinger , phys . * 127 * ( 1962 ) 324 . n. h. christ and t. d. lee , phys . d * 22 * ( 1980 ) 939 [ phys . scripta * 23 * ( 1981 ) 970 ] . s. weinberg , `` the quantum theory of fields . vol . 1 : foundations , '' _ cambridge , uk : univ . ( 1995 ) 609 p _ p. watson and h. reinhardt , phys . d * 75 * ( 2007 ) 045021 [ arxiv : hep - th/0612114 ] . p. watson and h. reinhardt , phys . d * 76 * ( 2007 ) 125016 [ arxiv:0709.0140 [ hep - th ] ] . a. andrasi , eur . j. c * 37 * ( 2004 ) 307 [ arxiv : hep - th/0311118 ] . a. andrasi and j. c. taylor , eur . j. c * 41 * ( 2005 ) 377 [ arxiv : hep - th/0503099 ] . d. zwanziger , nucl . b * 518 * ( 1998 ) 237 . r. n. mohapatra , phys . d * 4 * ( 1971 ) 378 ; 1007 . v. n. gribov , nucl . b * 139 * ( 1978 ) 1 . r. alkofer and j. greensite , j. phys . g * 34 * ( 2007 ) s3 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0610365 ] . a. niegawa , m. inui and h. kohyama , phys . d * 74 * ( 2006 ) 105016 [ arxiv : hep - th/0607207 ] . g. leibbrandt and j. williams , nucl . b * 475 * ( 1996 ) 469 [ arxiv : hep - th/9601046 ] . g. heinrich and g. leibbrandt , nucl . b * 575 * ( 2000 ) 359 [ arxiv : hep - th/9911211 ] . l. baulieu and d. zwanziger , nucl . b * 548 * ( 1999 ) 527 [ arxiv : hep - th/9807024 ] . a. p. szczepaniak and e. s. swanson , phys . d * 65 * ( 2002 ) 025012 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0107078 ] . a. andrasi and j. c. taylor , arxiv:0704.1420 [ hep - th ] . p. watson and h. reinhardt , phys . d * 77 * ( 2008 ) 025030 [ arxiv:0709.3963 [ hep - th ] ] . f. j. dyson , phys . * 75 * ( 1949 ) 1736 . j. s. schwinger , proc . nat . acad . * 37 * ( 1951 ) 452 ; 455 . r. alkofer and l. von smekal , phys . * 353 * ( 2001 ) 281 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0007355 ] . j. c. ward , phys . * 78 * ( 1950 ) 182 . h. s. green , proc . a * 66 * ( 1953 ) 873 . y. takahashi , nuovo cim . * 6 * ( 1957 ) 371 . j. c. taylor , nucl . b * 33 * ( 1971 ) 436 . a. a. slavnov , theor . * 10 * ( 1972 ) 99 [ teor . mat . * 10 * ( 1972 ) 153 ] . r. alkofer , m. q. huber and k. schwenzer , arxiv:0801 . 2762 [ hep - th ] ; comput . commun . * 180 * ( 2009 ) 965 [ arxiv:0808.2939 [ hep - th ] ] . j. hubbard , phys . rev . lett . * 3 * ( 1959 ) 77 . y. nambu and g. jona - lasinio , phys . rev . * 122 * , 345 ( 1961 ) . j. bardeen , l. n. cooper and j. r. schrieffer , phys . * 108 * ( 1957 ) 1175 . h. gies and c. wetterich , phys . d * 65 * ( 2002 ) 065001 , hep - th/0107221 . Abstract:
[ "the connection between the hamilton and the standard lagrange formalism is established for a generic quantum field theory with vanishing vacuum expectation values of the fundamental fields . the effective actions in both formalisms are the same if and only if the fundamental fields and the momentum fields are related by the stationarity condition . these momentum fields in general differ from the canonical fields as defined via the effective action . by means of functional methods a systematic procedure is presented to identify the full correlation functions , which depend on the momentum fields , as functionals of those usually appearing in the standard lagrange formalism . whereas lagrange correlation functions can be decomposed into tree diagrams the decomposition of hamilton correlation functions involves loop corrections similar to those arising in @xmath0-particle effective actions . to demonstrate the method we derive for theories with linearized interactions the propagators of composite auxiliary fields and the ones of the fundamental degrees of freedom . the formalism is then utilized in the case of coulomb gauge yang - mills theory for which the relations between the two - point correlation functions of the transversal and longitudinal components of the conjugate momentum to the ones of the gauge field are given ." ]
14,023
14,023
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: non - critical string theory @xcite provides a simple and tractable toy model to understand various aspects of string theory . one of the fascinating formulation of the theory is given by the description with the matrix model . this realizes a non - perturbative definition of string theory @xcite and provides an explicit example of gauge / string duality @xcite . recently , our knowledge about the duality in non - critical string theory has extended to various kind of string theories . the first non - trivial extension was to the correspondence between the two - cut matrix models @xcite and type 0 superstring theory @xcite ; later , the multi - cut matrix models @xcite were proposed as a description of fractional superstring theory @xcite . despite of many qualitative discussions , little is known quantitatively about the nature of multi - cut matrix models . therefore , in this paper we try to give explicit answers to the following questions : how do critical points and potentials look like and what is the corresponding geometry appearing at the vicinity of critical points ? to address these issues , _ macroscopic loop amplitudes _ @xcite have played important roles . the one - point function of macroscopic loop operator , which is also known as resolvent , is defined as @xmath9 . \label{introresolvent}\end{aligned}\ ] ] geometrically , the macroscopic loop amplitudes describe the probability amplitudes for creating holes on the two - dimensional surface as induced from the feynman graph of matrix integral . analytically , we can view the macroscopic loop amplitudes as a generating function for correlation functions of local operators ( in @xmath10 ) in the matrix models . most importantly , it enables us to probe eigenvalue distribution of a matrix @xmath10 @xcite and spacetime geometry in the weak coupling region @xcite . thus , the macroscopic loop amplitude is of fundamental importance in the theory of matrix models . in order to calculate the macroscopic loop amplitudes , one powerful way is to use the method of orthogonal polynomials @xcite . through a useful identity ( see appendix [ relationresolventorthpoly ] ) , we can express the resolvent @xmath11 and the spectral parameter @xmath12 as a pair of conjugate variables acting on the space of orthogonal polynomials , whose commutations relation gives rise to the douglas ( string ) equation . in terms of the differential operators , the string equation turns into a differential equation on the macroscopic loop amplitudes and we can solve it without directly evaluating the matrix integral ( [ introresolvent ] ) . right at the critical points , the resolvent has specific critical behavior . conversely , with some proper choice of the critical resolvent , one can obtain the critical potentials . in the two - matrix - model cases , this approach is especially useful for finding critical points @xcite and has been explicitly formulated for general @xmath13 critical points @xcite . along this line , we explicitly construct the critical points and potentials in the multi - cut two - matrix models . our results provide further insight into the understanding of the relationship @xcite between the existence of critical points and the the choice of hermiticity of critical potentials . macroscopic loop amplitudes at the vicinity of critical points ( i.e. with perturbation of the cosmological constant ) have been investigated in @xcite . the seminal formula for general @xmath13 critical points with cosmological constant @xmath14 was first found by kostov @xcite and can be expressed as @xmath15 with @xmath16 , _ the chebyshev polynomials of the first kind _ , and @xmath17 . in the case of @xmath18 minimal superstring theory ,- cut cases , there are two kinds of indexes : @xmath13 and @xmath18 . the former corresponds to the standard cft labeling of critical points ; the latter corresponds to order of differential operators @xmath19 and @xmath20 . these labellings are different in general @xcite@xcite . since the liouville continuum formulation of @xmath0 symmetric critical points has not been known so far , we only use @xmath18 labeling except for the bosonic @xmath21 cases . ] the corresponding formula was also found on the liouville side @xcite . the non - trivial solution ) with @xmath22 , which is called one - cut solution . the other is essentially different from the one - cut solution which is called two - cut solution ( [ introsupersesh ] ) . ] can be expressed as @xmath23 with @xmath24 , _ the chebyshev polynomials of the second kind _ , and @xmath17 . this general formula has been utilized in various studies of @xmath13 ( or @xmath18 ) critical points @xcite , even in the d - instanton effects of the string theory @xcite . moreover , in comparison with worldsheet cft , e.g. with the fzzt - brane or zz - brane amplitudes in liouville theory @xcite , it is essentially the above formula which is realized in the calculation of @xmath13 ( or @xmath18 ) minimal ( super)string theory @xcite . one of the significances of this formula is that it provides us further checks of the string duality ( e.g. matching of correlators ) beyond matching of operator contents and critical exponents . since this comparison is necessary especially in the correspondence between the multi - cut matrix models and fractional superstring theory @xcite , discovery of the general formula for the multi - cut two - matrix models is one of the most important stage in understanding the conjectured duality as well as the system itself . in this paper , the generalization of these formulae are explored especially in the @xmath0 symmetric potential @xmath25 , @xmath26 of the general @xmath2-cut two - matrix models @xmath27 . identifying a proper ansatz for the non - polynomial part of the amplitudes ( generalizing the square - root of ( [ introsupersesh ] ) ) , we explicitly show that there is a one - parameter set of solutions @xmath28 in the `` unitary '' series @xmath29 which can be tersely expressed as @xmath30{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^l\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{k - l } } , \\ q&= \mu^{\frac{\hat q}{\hat p+\hat q-1 } } p^{(-\frac{2l - k}{k},\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat q-1}(z ) \ , \sqrt[k]{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^{k - l}\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{l}},\end{aligned}\ ] ] in terms of _ the jacobi polynomials_. ] @xmath31 . this ansatz moreover enables us to explicitly describe the geometry of off - critical amplitudes . for instance , our ansatz for the @xmath32 case gives the following algebraic curve : @xmath33 which contains precisely three symmetric cuts corresponding to the eigenvalue distributions in the three - cut two matrix model . the organization of this paper is following : some basics of the multi - cut two - matrix models are reviewed in section [ subsecpreliminary ] . the scaling ansatz for the orthogonal polynomials and its relation to the @xmath34-rotated / real potentials are discussed in section [ secrotatedvsreal ] . the solutions for critical resolvents and potentials are studied in section [ seccritipotentialsresolvents ] ( some examples of critical potentials are listed in appendix [ listofcriticalpotentials ] ) . the daul - kazakov - kostov prescription @xcite is reviewed in section [ secrevofdkkoff ] and the two - cut cases are discussed in section [ twocutrevisited ] . the @xmath0 symmetric @xmath2-cut cases are studied in section [ kcutsymmetricjacobi ] . its algebraic structure is also discussed in section [ secgeometrymulticut ] . section [ secdiscussion ] is devoted to conclusion and discussion . some of the results for the critical potentials are listed in appendix [ listofcriticalpotentials ] . direct evaluation of douglas equation in the three - cut cases is given in appendix [ directevaluationthreecutstringeq ] . several useful formulae about jacobi polynomials are collected in appendix [ jacobip ] . we start with a brief review of some elementary facts about the orthogonal polynomial system in the multi - cut matrix models , which also serves to fix the notation used in this paper . as is the usual two - matrix model @xcite , the multi - cut two - matrix models are characterized by the orthonormal polynomial system , @xmath35 with an inner product , @xmath36 defined with respect to the two - matrix potential @xmath37 . we will use the normalization of the potential , @xmath38 , throughout the main text . the degrees of the potentials are chosen to be multiples of @xmath2 , @xmath39 here @xmath2 is the number of cuts and @xmath40 are arbitrary positive integers . a distinct feature of the multi - cut matrix models is that the integration domain @xmath41 is defined as a contour along radial directions specified by the @xmath42 symmetry of the system in the complex plane @xcite , @xmath43 where @xmath44 is a root of unity , which is chosen to be @xmath45 the @xmath2-cut matrix models possess a @xmath0 charge conjugation , which is a generalization of the reflection transformation for the matrix ( @xmath46 ) in the two - cut phases of the one - matrix models @xcite . the @xmath0 charge conjugation in the @xmath2-cut two - matrix models is given @xcite as @xmath47 which preserves the interaction term , @xmath48 , in the two - matrix potential . in general , if the potential @xmath25 is a @xmath0 symmetric potential , @xmath49 the system is said to be @xmath0 symmetric . the @xmath0 charge conjugation naturally defines a charge conjugation of the orthonormal polynomial as @xmath50 in the @xmath0 symmetric cases , the orthonormal polynomials are invariant under this charge conjugation , equivalently we have @xmath51 that is , the orthonormal polynomials are eigenfunctions of this @xmath0 transformation . the orthonormal polynomial system is characterized by the recursive relation , which can be written as @xmath52 where @xmath53 and @xmath54 . here @xmath55 is the index - shift operator @xcite@xcite@xcite that shifts every index @xmath56 by one unit on its right - hand side : @xmath57 and @xmath58 . note that , by construction , @xmath59 and @xmath60 can not be zero , @xmath61 including @xmath62 . in the @xmath0 symmetric case , invariance of the system asserts that the expansion coefficients @xmath63 and @xmath64 must be zero except for @xmath65 with @xmath66 and @xmath67 . from the recursive relation ( [ orthrecab ] ) and ( [ orthreccd ] ) , one can check that the operator pairs @xmath68 and @xmath69 satisfy the canonical commutation relations , @xmath70=[c , d]=n^{-1}. \label{primitiveccr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] furthermore , taking inner product ( [ orth ] ) between @xmath71 and @xmath72 and then integration by part leads to the following identity , @xmath73 combine these equations together , it can be seen that there is only one independent canonical commutation relation , @xmath74=\bigl[c,\bigl(-a^{\rm t}\bigr)\bigr ] = n^{-1}. \label{twomatccr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] one can also extract equations for @xmath75 and @xmath76 from eq . ( [ steqmatrix ] ) : @xmath77_{\geq -1 } - z^{-1}\frac{n / n}{\sqrt{r(n ) } } , \label{twomata}\\ c(n , z)&= \bigl[v_1'\bigl(a^{\rm t}(n , z)\bigr)\bigr]_{\geq -1 } - z^{-1}\frac{n / n}{\sqrt{r(n)}}. \label{twomatc}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here the bracket is defined as @xmath78_{\geq n}\equiv \left\ { \begin{array}{ll } z^s & ( s\geq n ) \cr 0 & ( s < n ) . \end{array } \right.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the system of equations was originally used to extract the string equations @xcite and can be considered as the fundamental equations dictating the double scaling limit of the two - matrix models . once we solve @xmath75 and @xmath76 , eq . ( [ steqmatrix ] ) leads to the solution of @xmath79 and @xmath80 in straightforward manner . the strategy for solving critical points in two - matrix models was proposed in @xcite . the observation is this ; the operators @xmath75 and @xmath76 have the following scaling behaviors at @xmath13 critical points ( determined by critical potentials ) : @xmath81 where the lattice spacing @xmath82 is introduced to satisfy @xmath83 & { \partial}_n = -a^{1/2 } g_{str}{\partial}_t \equiv -a^{1/2}{\partial}\to 0,\qquad ( a\to 0 ) , \label{scalinglattice}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the operator @xmath84 is the index - derivative operator in the index - shift operator @xmath85 . conversely , if one assumes this critical behavior ( [ twomatcriti ] ) , then there exist critical points . that is , we can obtain critical potentials which satisfy eq s ( [ twomata ] ) and ( [ twomatc ] ) @xcite . explicit solutions to this problem have been given in @xcite for the general @xmath13 critical points in the one - cut cases as follows : for each pair of potentials with degrees @xmath86 ( @xmath87 of eq . ( [ twomatpotentialorder ] ) ) , the maximal order of the differential operators ( [ twomatcriti ] ) is @xmath88 and the operator @xmath75 and @xmath76 is given as @xmath89 in the large @xmath1 limit . here @xmath90 is the critical value of @xmath60 , @xmath91 then it can be shown that , with these critical forms of @xmath75 and @xmath76 , we can solve for the critical potential @xmath25 which satisfies eq . ( [ twomata ] ) and ( [ twomatc ] ) . in the rest of this section , we generalize this idea to the multi - cut setting . the procedure of section [ subsecpreliminary ] implies that the orthonormal polynomials become smooth functions of the index @xmath56 at the vicinity of the critical points , especially at eq . ( [ scalinglattice ] ) . the scaling ansatz for the multi - cut cases is to find a sequence of orthonormal polynomials @xmath92 ( and @xmath93 ) which are smooth continuous functions in not only @xmath12 but also the index @xmath56 . first of all , since the orthonormal polynomials behave under @xmath0 transformation as @xmath94 there should be @xmath2 distinct smooth scaling functions , each of which has a distinct eigenvalue of the @xmath0 transformation . this is obvious in the @xmath0 symmetric background ( [ zksympol ] ) . hence , we separate the polynomials into the following @xmath2 sets of polynomials @xmath95 with respect to mod @xmath2 . for each set labeled by @xmath96 , we assume that there exists a smooth function in @xmath97 which can be regarded as the continuum limit of the sequence . the proper choice of the smooth functions was first proposed in @xcite and we further write it as @xmath98 with @xmath99 the phase factors indicate that the polynomials are approximated by smooth functions in the directions of @xmath100 and @xmath101 : @xmath102 since the phase does not depend on @xmath97 here . these directions are actually the liouville direction @xcite@xcite@xcite . the main reason for this ansatz is that the critical point of eigenvalues , @xmath103 , is at the origin @xmath104 when we consider @xmath0 symmetric potentials @xmath105 .. ] the consequence is that the operators acting on the vector - valued polynomials @xmath106 ( and @xmath107 ) become smooth functions of @xmath97 . the operators in this basis are expressed as @xmath108 with explicit expressions : @xmath109 where @xmath110 with @xmath111 and @xmath112 here @xmath113 is the identity matrix of @xmath114 . now eq . ( [ steqmatrix ] ) becomes @xmath115 in terms of the @xmath114 matrix - valued operators @xmath116 and @xmath117 . note that the smoothness of polynomials @xmath106 and @xmath107 in the index @xmath97 only implies smoothness of sequence of recursion coefficients @xmath118 in the index @xmath97 . this means that each recursion coefficient sequence ( labeled by @xmath96 ) can be approximated by a smooth function with the following taylor expansion with respect to the scaling parameter @xmath119 ; @xmath120 here the lattice spacing @xmath82 and scaling parameter @xmath121 are defined as @xmath122 & { \partial}_n = -a^{1/2 } g_{str}{\partial}_t \equiv -a^{1/2}{\partial}\to 0,\qquad ( a\to 0 ) , \label{scalinglattice2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for the @xmath18 critical points of the multi - cut matrix models . it has been argued in the two - cut matrix models @xcite that @xmath123 symmetry breaking critical points can only be realized in the potentials @xmath124 which has an imaginary number @xmath125 in the following way : @xmath126 here the potential @xmath127 is polynomial in @xmath12 with real coefficients . this consideration has a natural correspondence in the liouville theory because the liouville boundary cosmological constant @xmath128 is related to the eigenvalue @xmath12 with an imaginary number @xmath125 @xcite as @xmath129 a natural extension of this consideration is the @xmath34-rotated potential ( [ rotatedpotentials ] ) . from our results , . ] within the prescription reviewed in section [ subsecpreliminary ] , one can also find real - potential solutions for the @xmath123 symmetry breaking critical points . therefore , we consider both cases in this section . we will show in the next subsection that , at least in the sense of critical potentials , the map between two potentials is just an analytic continuation . the @xmath34-rotated potentials are defined as @xmath130 with a real - coefficient potential @xmath131 . if one puts @xmath132 , then this turns out to be eq . ( [ antihermitian ] ) given in @xcite . from the definition , this potential satisfies @xmath133 and consequently one can show that are real functions . ] @xmath134 therefore the uniqueness of the orthonormal polynomials implies @xmath135 here we have used the invariance of contour @xmath136 and the @xmath0 invariance of the measure , @xmath137 . this complex conjugation corresponds to the @xmath0 charge conjugation of the polynomials ( [ chargeconjpols22 ] ) , @xmath138 the hermiticity of coefficients in the operators @xmath75 , @xmath79 , @xmath76 and @xmath80 is also obtained in the same way as @xmath139 comparing this with the expression ( [ aoptilde ] ) , ( [ boptilde ] ) , ( [ coptilde ] ) and ( [ doptilde ] ) , one can see that the coefficients of the matrix - valued operators @xmath140 are all real number . in this sense , eq . ( [ tildesteqmatrix ] ) can have critical solutions with this @xmath34-rotated potential , including the @xmath0 symmetry breaking critical points . the real - potential models are defined by real two - matrix potentials @xmath25 with all coefficients real : @xmath141 the same discussion as above shows that the polynomials @xmath142 and @xmath143 , and the operators @xmath144 , and @xmath80 are all real functions . the relation between eq . ( [ steqmatrix ] ) and the smooth operators becomes simpler if one considers another convention of smooth orthonormal polynomials : @xmath145 } \alpha_{kl+j}(x),\qquad \chi_{l , j}^{(\rm real)}(y ) \equiv ( -1)^{[-\frac{kl+j}{k } ] } \beta_{kl+j}(y),\end{aligned}\ ] ] instead of eq . ( [ smoothfunpsichicomp ] ) . the corresponding smooth operators @xmath146 and @xmath147 are then given as @xmath148 here @xmath149 and @xmath150 are the counterpart of @xmath106 and @xmath107 given in eq . ( [ smoothfunpsichi ] ) . one can easily see that the operator @xmath151 can be obtained from @xmath152 by just replacing the phase @xmath153 in eq . ( [ aoptilde ] ) with @xmath154}$ ] ( the phases in the other operators @xmath155 are also similarly replaced : the phase @xmath156 is replaced by @xmath157}$ ] ) and by replacing the matrix @xmath158 with the matrix @xmath159 , @xmath160 which satisfies @xmath161 . here @xmath162 $ ] is the gauss symbol , which expresses the maximal integer less than or equal to @xmath163 . then eq . ( [ tildesteqmatrix ] ) is equivalent to @xmath164 since everything is real here , one can have critical points ( even @xmath0 symmetry breaking ones ) in the same sense as the @xmath34-rotated models . the large @xmath1 solutions to eq . ( [ tildesteqmatrix ] ) are given by critical values of the matrix - valued operators @xmath165 and @xmath166 ( defined in eq . ( [ aoptilde ] ) and eq . ( [ coptilde ] ) ) , @xmath167 and the critical potentials @xmath168 . at the vicinity of critical points , the coefficients of operators @xmath165 ( and @xmath166 ) should be approximated by the following smooth functions ; @xmath169 in principle , the leading coefficients @xmath170 ( and @xmath171 ) can depend on the index @xmath96 and the critical operators of @xmath165 ( and @xmath172 ) are expanded by these coefficients . for a while , let us see what happens in some special cases .. ] that is , we consider the @xmath173 critical points realized in the potentials of degree @xmath174 ( see eq . ( [ twomatpotentialorder ] ) ) . first we solve the condition ( [ accriticalmulticut ] ) . since @xmath165 and @xmath172 are almost similar , the operator @xmath165 is only considered here . by solving eq . ( [ accriticalmulticut ] ) in this critical point @xmath173 , , one performs the taylor expansion of @xmath175 in terms of @xmath84 and requires @xmath176 . then one can obtain constraints on the coefficients @xmath177 . the result is eq . ( [ solderivaaa ] ) ] one can obtain the critical operator of @xmath165 as @xmath178 the matrix @xmath179 is defined in eq . ( [ defmatr ] ) and the elements @xmath180 can depend on the index @xmath96 in principle . from eq . ( [ aoptilde ] ) , therefore , one can obtain @xmath181 here each term contains a phase factor @xmath182 . since @xmath183 is a multiple of @xmath2 ( say @xmath184 ) and @xmath185 , we get @xmath186 that is , the operator @xmath75 ( and similarly the operator @xmath76 ) is given as @xmath187 we then consider eq . ( [ twomata ] ) and eq . ( [ twomatc ] ) . the above operators @xmath188 and @xmath189 ( @xmath190 ) satisfy eq . ( [ twomata ] ) and eq . ( [ twomatc ] ) for each @xmath96 . by solving these equations , one can obtain the critical potentials and the solutions are realized when one has @xmath191 therefore , the critical behavior of matrix - valued operators @xmath165 and @xmath166 is finally given as @xmath192 several examples of critical potentials calculated by using the above procedure are listed in appendix [ listofcriticalpotentials ] and some critical potentials are drawn in fig . [ criticalpotential223 ] . note that all the parameters here , including @xmath90 , are fixed in this procedure . , but the critical points of eigenvalues are located at the origin , @xmath104 , we have chosen the scale , @xmath193 , and @xmath194 was fixed by choosing the convention of overall coefficient in the orthonormal polynomials ( [ onpmethod ] ) . in this sense , there is no free parameter here . one can also say that one can freely tune the parameter @xmath90 by turning on @xmath195 . this procedure is a redundant deformation which does not change the result , and we will use this fact in appendix [ listofcriticalpotentials ] . ] the result ( [ rareequal ] ) implies that all the @xmath2 coefficient sequences @xmath170 ( @xmath190 ) have the same asymptotic behavior at @xmath196 limit , i.e. at critical point , the coefficients satisfy @xmath197 even though @xmath198 can be approximated by @xmath2 different scaling functions ( e.g. @xmath199 ) in the sub - leading terms of eq . ( [ scalingfunctionsac ] ) . this was just an assumption in the previous discussion of the two - cut two - matrix models @xcite but here we have checked that this is generally correct in the multi - cut two - matrix models . next consider the critical points of @xmath200 realized in the potentials of degree @xmath174 ( see ( [ twomatpotentialorder ] ) ) . this contains @xmath0 symmetry breaking critical points @xmath18 . the critical operators of @xmath165 and @xmath166 are given as @xmath201 with @xmath202 ( see eq . ( [ barabcd ] ) ) . in particular , from eq . ( [ coptilde ] ) , one can see the following relations : @xmath203 therefore , the operators @xmath75 and @xmath76 are also obtained in the similar manner as eq . ( [ critiacwithoutt ] ) , and given as @xmath204 the critical points and potentials in this cases are also obtained with these operators and eq s ( [ twomata ] ) and ( [ twomatc ] ) , which are also listed in appendix [ listofcriticalpotentials ] . note that the critical potentials now depend on the parameters @xmath205 and @xmath206 . note that the difference between the @xmath34-rotated potentials ( [ rotatedpotentials ] ) and the real potentials ( [ realpotentials ] ) is almost the complex phase of @xmath207 @xmath208 in eq . ( [ accritibreaking1 ] ) . since we obtain the critical potentials by solving eq s ( [ twomata ] ) and ( [ twomatc ] ) by using eq . ( [ accritibreaking1 ] ) , the map from real critical potentials to @xmath34-rotated ones is also given by just analytically continuing the parameters @xmath209 in the real potentials to the complex values @xmath210 . this means that all the @xmath0 symmetric @xmath18 critical points and @xmath0-symmetry breaking @xmath18 critical points can be realized within both real potentials and @xmath34-rotated potentials of @xmath2-cut two - matrix models , and also that these real/@xmath34-rotated critical potentials are related to each other by just the above analytic continuation . , @xmath211 ; ( b ) @xmath212 , @xmath213 ; ( c ) @xmath214 , @xmath215 . ( a1 ) , ( b1 ) and ( c1 ) are plots in the real axes . the figures ( a2 ) , ( b2 ) and ( c2 ) are plots of the real part of the potentials @xmath216 on the complex sheet of @xmath12 . the straight lines with arrows on them correspond to the contour @xmath217 of integration . darker color means lower height . ] one can then realize the canonical operators in terms of the lax pair , and they are given by @xmath218 with @xmath219 { \partial}^{\hat q } + \sum_{n=0}^{\hat q-1}\widetilde h_n(t)\ , { \partial}^{\hat q- n},\label{tolax2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the canonical commutation relation ( [ twomatccr ] ) becomes the douglas equation , @xmath220=g_{str}i_k$ ] . the functions @xmath221 and @xmath222 are some combination of scaling functions in ( [ scalingfunctionsac ] ) . the parameter @xmath82 is a lattice spacing of @xmath223 . here we define @xmath224 here @xmath221 and @xmath225 are all real functions . since we can erase some parts of sub - leading scaling functions @xmath221 and @xmath222 by changing normalization of orthonormal polynomials ( some similarity transformation ) , we can always put @xmath226_{l+i , i } , \label{honeconst}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for @xmath227 . here we extend the meaning of indices as @xmath228_{i+lk , j+mk } \equiv \bigl[h_1(t)\bigr]_{i , j}$ ] it is also convenient to use the diagonalized basis of @xmath229 which is useful for analyzing multi - component kp hierarchy @xcite : @xmath230 and the matrix elements of @xmath231 are given by @xmath232 in this basis , the relation ( [ honeconst ] ) is simply given as @xmath233_{i , i } = 0\qquad ( i=1,2,\cdots , k).\end{aligned}\ ] ] however , from the analysis we have shown in section [ secrotatedvsreal ] , the component functions in the operators @xmath234 @xmath235 are complex - valued functions now . here we comment on the `` unitary '' series which is defined by the condition of @xmath236 . symmetric '' case in literature , in the sense of exchanging the matrices @xmath237 . since the terminology of `` @xmath123 symmetric '' is dedicated to @xmath0 symmetry in this paper , we will use the term `` unitary '' referring to the @xmath236 case . of course , the terminology of `` unitary '' should come from the worldsheet cft of dual string theory , and therefore our terminology `` unitary '' should be understood as a formal notion . in the case of one- and two - cut matrix models , this situation always gives unitary sequences although obtaining unitary sequences does not necessarily require this condition . ] we should note that the unitary series of the @xmath0 symmetric background is given by @xmath238 instead of @xmath239 . this can be understood as follows : in general , the `` unitary '' condition gives @xmath240 in the @xmath0 symmetric background . here @xmath241 . in the superstring ( @xmath132 ) cases , since the matrix @xmath158 satisfies @xmath242 the following combination of the operators @xmath165 and @xmath172 @xmath243 gives the @xmath244 system . the same argument also applies to the bosonic ( @xmath87 ) cases . for the @xmath245-cut @xmath0 symmetric background case , the matrices @xmath158 and @xmath246 are essentially different matrices ; hence , the previous argument fails . this means that the unitary series should be @xmath247 . on the other hand , if we consider the @xmath0 symmetry breaking critical points which correspond to minimal fractional superstring theory @xcite , @xmath248 & = a^{\hat q}\times \sqrt{r_*}\,k^{\hat q } \,\gamma\ , { \partial}^{\hat q } + \cdots,\end{aligned}\ ] ] the matrices of the leading terms in @xmath165 and @xmath172 are both given by @xmath158 . that is , the situation is similar to the super(bosonic)string cases . in fact , unitary minimal fractional superstring theory corresponds to the @xmath244 critical points , instead of @xmath247 . in this section , we consider off - critical behavior of the critical points we identified in the multi - cut matrix models . the prescription we adopt for studying off - critical amplitudes was developed in the one - cut two - matrix models @xcite , which we refer to as the dkk prescription . in the following , we first review their procedure then consider the extension to the multi - cut cases . at the @xmath13 one - cut critical points , the canonical pair of @xmath75 and @xmath76 operators was given as @xmath249 here we choose @xmath250 . considering the dependence on @xmath251 in the operators @xmath75 and @xmath76 is equivalent to turning on the coupling of the most relevant operator , @xmath121 . since we have dimensionful parameter @xmath121 , we can make a dimensionless combination with @xmath252 as @xmath253 = n \kappa t^n , \label{defofsmallz}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath254 . then the off - critical amplitudes of the canonical operators are generally expressed as @xmath255 note that the leading behavior of the polynomials @xmath256 and @xmath257 are @xmath258 so the commutation relation becomes @xmath259 = n^{-1 } \ , \frac{q\,\pi'_p(z)\ , \xi_q(z)-p\,\xi'_q(z)\,\pi_p(z)}{p+q-1},\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath260 this was found in @xcite and is one of the main equation for off - critical amplitudes in the two - matrix models . it is known that this system has a simple solution for conformal background which is given by the chebyshev polynomials of the first kind , @xmath261 @xcite . in the case of unitary series @xmath262 , the equation ( [ dkkeq ] ) becomes the addition formula for the hyperbolic sine and cosine functions : @xmath263 consequently , the solution for @xmath264 is @xmath265 with the normalization factor @xmath266 which satisfies @xmath267 and @xmath268 . for the general @xmath13 cases , the chebyshev - polynomial is not a solution to eq . ( [ dkkeq ] ) . however , aside from the unitary series , the most relevant operator and cosmological constant are different in general ; considering this fact here , it means that there can be a jacobian factor in the eq . ( [ dkkeq ] ) in general . therefore , we will utilize this degree of freedom to deform the eq . ( [ dkkeq ] ) ; it was proposed in @xcite that the simple solutions with the chebyshev polynomials can be derived from @xmath269 here @xmath270 with @xmath271 . this procedure corresponds to utilizing the canonical pair @xmath272 of the cosmological constant @xmath14 @xcite , @xmath273 = \kappa \ , n\ , \mu^n,\end{aligned}\ ] ] instead of the canonical coordinates @xmath274 of the most relevant operator @xmath121 , @xmath275 = \kappa\ , n\ , t^n.\end{aligned}\ ] ] so in general the equation we have is @xmath276 in this procedure , the requirement of matrix model is that the functions of @xmath277 in the operators @xmath75 and @xmath278 are all polynomials in @xmath277 . one can expect that @xmath279 should be polynomials in general background . the solution for conformal background in the superstring cases was first obtained in @xcite . there are two classes of the solutions . the first class is called the one - cut - phase solution : @xmath280 the second is called the two - cut - phase solution : @xmath281 here we use @xmath282 and @xmath283 is the fzzt disk amplitude . realization of this solution in the pure - supergravity critical point was shown in @xcite . realization of @xmath18 solutions in the two - cut two - matrix models was shown in @xcite , with the sft formulation @xcite@xcite and its prescription utilizing the @xmath284 constraints @xcite . in the dkk prescription , what we need to consider is the douglas equation for the matrix - valued lax operators @xmath285 and @xmath286 of eq s ( [ aoptilde ] ) and ( [ coptilde ] ) . since @xmath285 and @xmath286 can generally be expanded in terms of pauli matrices @xmath287 , one can decompose the string equation in the following form : @xmath288\ , a^{-\frac{\hat p+\hat q}{2}}\lambda^{-(\hat p+\hat q ) } -\kappa i_2 = \text{(ccr0)}\ , \kappa^0 + \text{(ccr1 ) } \,\kappa i_2 + \text{(ccr2)}\ , \kappa \sigma_3+o(\kappa^2 ) . \label{doug2cut}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the one - cut solution is trivially the solution found in the bosonic case . the two - cut solution is less trivial but can be realized as @xmath289 with @xmath290 . one can easily show that this satisfies the douglas equations ( [ doug2cut ] ) . the curly bracket @xmath291 denotes anti - commutator which is necessary to satisfy ( ccr2 ) . the implications of this system are the following : * the zero - th order equation of the douglas equation , ( ccr0 ) , indicates that @xmath165 commutes with @xmath172 . that is , @xmath165 and @xmath172 can be diagonalized simultaneously . , corresponds to the fzzt brane amplitude with each different r - r charge . ] * eigenvalues of the matrices @xmath165 and @xmath172 satisfy the same equation ( [ dkkeq ] ) as in the bosonic case . the important difference is now the eigenvalues can include non - polynomial parts ( e.g. the square root in eq . ( [ 2cutsolsesh ] ) ) , as long as all the matrix elements remain to be polynomials in the matrix - model realization ( [ 2cutsoldkk ] ) . * usually , some naive expression of the matrix - model realization ( e.g. eq . ( [ 2cutsoldkk ] ) without the anti - commutator ) can not satisfy ( ccr2 ) . in this case , we need to add proper first order corrections to the operators @xmath165 and @xmath172 . and @xmath277 . but in the higher - cut cases , we need to add purely first order corrections to the scaling functions in the operators @xmath165 and @xmath172 . see section [ directanalysis11cases ] . ] now we can extend the previous discussion to the @xmath2-cut matrix models . here we will focus on the general considerations ; more detailed investigation of the three - cut string equation can be found in appendix [ directevaluationthreecutstringeq ] . for the sake of simplicity , we consider the models with the @xmath0 symmetric background . in this case , the operators @xmath285 and @xmath292 are restricted to @xmath293 the matrix - model requires that all the functions @xmath294 and @xmath295 are polynomials in @xmath277 . thus the diagonalization is just given by @xmath296 with @xmath297 and @xmath298 and @xmath299 . here @xmath300 and @xmath301 are all polynomials and the equality `` @xmath302 '' indicates diagonalization . then eq . ( [ dkkeq ] ) is expressed as @xmath303 since the left - hand side of the equation is a polynomial , we need to resolve the @xmath2-th root @xmath304 in the right - hand side . a natural ansatz is @xmath305 which is characterized by the two indices @xmath306 . then the equation turns out to be @xmath307 + { \nonumber}\\ & + \bigl[(\hat q-\hat p ) z + \hat p \gamma_{\hat p } - \hat q \gamma_{\hat q}\bigr ] \rho_{\hat p}(z)\ , \eta_{\hat q}(z)=\hat p+\hat q-1 , \label{cisyeq}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath308 this solution can be realized in the matrix model as @xmath309,\qquad \mathcal c^{\rm t}(n , z ) = -a^{\hat q/2 } \lambda^{\hat q } \eta_{\hat q } ( z ) \bigl [ \gamma^{-1 } z - \bar m\bigr],\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath310 note that there is a sequence of @xmath97 @xmath266 s in @xmath311 and a sequence of @xmath97 @xmath312 s in @xmath313 . these matrices satisfy @xmath314 and @xmath315 = [ \gamma^{-1},\bar m]$ ] which result in ( ccr0 ) . of course , there is some ambiguity of taking permutation among the positions of @xmath312 and @xmath266 . where we explicitly study all possible solutions of the string equations in the three - cut cases . ] also we have the constraint of eq . ( [ honeconst ] ) , which means that @xmath316 with the above setting , we can solve equation ( [ cisyeq ] ) . from straightforward evaluation of eq . ( [ cisyeq ] ) , one observes that the parameters @xmath312 and @xmath266 satisfy @xmath317 except for @xmath318 case ; it can also be seen that @xmath319 is related to @xmath320 as @xmath321 for unitary series @xmath322 , one can see that they satisfy @xmath323 which leads to simple solutions of eq . ( [ cisyeq ] ) ; for instance , we list first five solutions of @xmath324 in the following : ) can generate polynomials ( i.e. solutions of eq . ( [ cisyeq ] ) ) in all the @xmath18 critical points not only in the unitary cases @xmath322 listed below . ] @xmath325 our claim is that the solutions for the unitary cases @xmath326 can be expressed by the jacobi polynomials , @xmath327 . in the diagonalized form ( [ diagac ] ) , the solution is given as @xmath328{\bigl(z - c\bigr)^l\bigl(z+c\bigr)^{k - l } } \times \omega { \nonumber}\\ \mathcal c^{\rm t}(n , z ) & \simeq a^{\hat q/2}\ , \frac{\gamma(\hat p)^2}{2c \gamma(2\hat p-1 ) } \bigl(2c k\lambda\bigr)^{\hat p } p^{(-\frac{2l - k}{k},\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z / c ) \ , \sqrt[k]{\bigl(z - c\bigr)^{k - l}\bigl(z+c\bigr)^{l}}\times \omega^{-1 } , \label{cisysol}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath329 here @xmath330 is the beta function and also @xmath331 is given in ( [ defomega ] ) . note that the relation ( [ exchangeabxp ] ) is essentially the identity ( [ exchangeab ] ) of the jacobi polynomials , @xmath332 . we show that the above expressions of @xmath165 and @xmath166 solve eq . ( [ cisyeq ] ) for general indices @xmath306 in appendix [ jacobipproof ] . for the three - cut critical points of @xmath333 , some of the solutions can be written in terms of the chebyshev polynomials . since this solution is very similar to the solutions of one - cut and two - cut cases , it provides simple examples to see what happens in multi - cut cases . in the case of @xmath318 , the constraints ( [ honeconst ] ) turns out to be @xmath334 when we have @xmath324 , then @xmath335 . a solution which satisfies this constraint is given by @xmath336{\bigl(z - c\bigr)^2\bigl(z+2c\bigr)}\times \omega,{\nonumber}\\ \mathcal c^{\rm t}(n , z ) & \simeq a^{\hat q/2}\,c^{-1}\bigl(\frac{3c \lambda}{2}\bigr)^{\hat q } \bigl(2\cosh\bigl(\frac{3}{2}\tau\bigr)\bigr)^{\frac{1}{3}}\ , \cosh \bigl(\frac{2\hat q-1}{2}\tau\bigr)\times \omega^{-1}{\nonumber}\\ & = a^{\hat q/2}\,c^{-1}\bigl(\frac{3c \lambda}{2}\bigr)^{\hat q}\ , w_{\hat q-1}\bigl(z / c\bigr ) \sqrt[3]{\bigl(z - c\bigr)\bigl(z+2c\bigr)^2}\times \omega^{-1 } , \label{cheb3cutsol}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath337 . here the polynomial @xmath338 is the chebyshev polynomial of the fourth kind : @xmath339 this satisfies the deformed equation ( [ deformeddkkeq ] ) with the canonical pair @xmath340 , critical point in the @xmath341-symmetric 3-cut cases . ] @xmath342 = n \kappa \tilde\mu^n,\qquad w(z)\sim \cosh ( \hat q-2)\tau \sim t_{|\hat q-2|}(z / c ) , \ ] ] with some proper normalization . here we consider geometry of the multi - cut solutions we have obtained . the purpose is two - folded ; first , it serves as a check of our ansatz ( [ cisyansatz ] ) ; second , it provides some physical intuition to the multi - cut system . the algebraic equation of the @xmath318 solution ( [ cheb3cutsol ] ) is easily written down as @xmath343 where we define @xmath344 and @xmath345 are the eigenvalues of the operators @xmath346 and @xmath347 ( see eq . ( [ tolax1 ] ) ) . one can easily see that this equation is an algebraic equation in @xmath128 and @xmath11 . note that there are three branches , @xmath348 @xmath349 , of the algebraic equation , @xmath350 and this defines the three sheets of the riemann surface . these branches are related by the following shift of the parameter @xmath351 , @xmath352 in the expression of eq . ( [ cheb3cutsol ] ) , since this shift does not change the coordinate @xmath128 . this algebraic equation has singularities @xmath353 , @xmath354 at the origin @xmath355 and at @xmath356 of @xmath357 with @xmath358 and @xmath359 . the geometrical meaning of singular points is that different branches of riemann surface intersect at the points . since the singular point at the origin does not change under the shift of @xmath351 of eq . ( [ shiftbranches ] ) , this singular point joins the three sheets at the same time . on the other hand , the singular points given in ( [ singularpointspeq1 ] ) only join two sheets at the same time . the reason is following : the invariance of the singular points ( [ singularpointspeq1 ] ) under the shift ( [ shiftbranches ] ) is essentially given by the invariance of the factor @xmath360 in @xmath361 , that is , @xmath362 \qquad ( m=0,1,2).\end{aligned}\ ] ] since the @xmath341 symmetric @xmath318 critical points satisfy @xmath363 , the above condition is only satisfied by two different values of @xmath364 . this means that the singular points only join two sheets at the same time . the branch points @xmath365 of the function @xmath366 , @xmath367 appear when @xmath368 one can see that the singular points ( [ singularpointspeq1 ] ) appear between the origin and the branch points in the @xmath341 symmetric manner ( i.e. @xmath369 ) . the simplest curve ( the @xmath370 cases ) , @xmath371 is drawn in fig . [ 3cutgeometry ] . the topology of the curves is also shown in fig . [ 3cuttopology ] . note that there is a non - trivial handle in the algebraic curve . this comes from the cubic root in the curve . the appearance of non - trivial handle is explained in appendix [ appcubicroots ] , where some basic properties of cubic roots are summarized . case and @xmath372 , which is given by @xmath373 . the branch points are at @xmath374 @xmath375 . the singularity is at the origin @xmath376 . ] and ( b ) @xmath377 . the junction of three sheets is the singular point at the origin . the torus comes from the cubic - root cut . two - sheet junctions in ( b ) are the singular points of ( [ singularpointspeq1 ] ) , the number of which is nine . ] we also write the algebraic curve of the @xmath378 cases as @xmath379 with @xmath380 and @xmath381{\bigl(z-\frac{3f}{2}\bigr)^2\bigl(z+\frac{3f}{2}\bigr ) } , \quad q=\mu^{2/3 } \bigl(z-\frac{f}{2}\bigr)\,\sqrt[3]{\bigl(z-\frac{3f}{2}\bigr)\bigl(z+\frac{3f}{2}\bigr)^2}. \end{aligned}\ ] ] one can see that this solution also has three branch points . next we consider the counterpart solution of `` one - cut phase '' in the two - cut matrix models , i.e. @xmath382 . we here adopt the expression ( [ onecutthreecut ] ) derived from direct analysis of the string equation , and leave the details in appendix [ directevaluationthreecutstringeq ] . the diagonalization of the matrix operators gives @xmath383 here we put @xmath384 and @xmath385 ( see eq . ( [ defofsmallz ] ) ) . they give three algebraic equations : @xmath386 since the phase @xmath44 labels branches of the solution , the complete algebraic equation should be given by multiplication of these equations , @xmath387 this curve has no branch point but has three singular points which are at @xmath388 @xmath375 . one can also see that these singular points only join two sheets at the same time . the curve is drawn in fig . [ 3cutonecutgeometry ] . the topology of the curve is also shown in fig . [ 3cutonecuttopology ] . case and @xmath382 , which is given by @xmath389 . the singularities are at @xmath390 @xmath375 . there is no branch point , but we explicitly show the cut which indicates the eigenvalue condensation . this cut has a junction of three cuts , which is allowed in the cubic root . since there is no branch point attached by this cut , one can also push this cut away to infinity . ] . ( a ) is the case of finite @xmath14 and ( b ) is the case of @xmath391 . ] here in fig . [ 3cutonecutgeometry ] , we draw a single connected cut which does not attach any branch points . this cut has a junction of three cuts . this kind of junction is always allowed in general @xmath2-th root ( see appendix [ appcubicroots ] ) . since there is no branch point here , one can also push this cut away to infinity . although this cut can be pushed away , this has a physical meaning as the eigenvalue condensation . there is a similar phenomenon in the two - cut matrix models @xcite : in the one - cut phase of two - cut matrix models , the `` two cuts '' are completely connected with each other and form `` a single cut '' , which run along the whole real axes . since the branch points disappear in this procedure , one can also push this cut away to infinity . in our three - cut case , since the cubic - root system admits a @xmath341 symmetric cut which has a three - cut junction without any branch points , it is natural to interpret that this system still have this kind of cut which indicates the eigenvalue density . in this paper , we have provided quantitative analysis of @xmath18 critical points in the multi - cut two - matrix models based on an extension of the prescription developed by daul , kazakov and kostov in the one - cut two - matrix models @xcite . right at the critical points , we identified the minimal construction of critical resolvents and potentials which can give @xmath18 critical points of the multi - cut two - matrix models . the hermiticity of the lax operators realized in the multi - cut critical points is identified . we have also studied off - critical behavior of macroscopic loop amplitudes . in this study , we identified an ansatz for non - polynomial parts of amplitudes in the @xmath0 symmetric background . this ansatz enables us to generate several formulas for off - critical macroscopic loop amplitudes : the intriguing one is the formula written with the jacobi polynomials in the unitary cases @xmath322 . several future issues about our results are in order : * in identification of the critical points , we only consider the system of equations ( [ primitiveccr ] ) and ( [ steqmatrix ] ) . in this investigation , there is no essential difference between the real potential models and the @xmath34-rotated models , in the sense of existence of @xmath0 symmetry breaking critical points . as an independent check , one can perform direct evaluations using the monte carlo approach @xcite , since our real - potential solutions can avoid the difficulty of complex numbers in numerical analysis . * although we have found the formula for the unitary cases ( [ cisysol ] ) , the expression in terms of algebraic equation is missing . since underlying structure is multi - component kp hierarchy @xcite , they should be expressed by the algebraic equation of @xmath392 order , @xmath393 @xcite . * from our analysis , the system of douglas equation in the @xmath0 symmetric background admits one discrete parameter @xmath97 in the expression ( [ cisysol ] ) . the off - critical system is , however , controlled only by a dimension - full perturbation @xmath14 . this parameter @xmath97 seems mysterious because one may expect that there are at most two meaningful geometries which respect the sign of @xmath14 . the physical meaning of the parameter @xmath97 , therefore , should be an interesting question to be investigated . * since our analysis only concentrates on the possible asymptotic ( weak coupling ) geometries of macroscopic loop amplitudes , the consideration about interpolation between different asymptotic geometries ( which might be expressed by @xmath97 ) is necessary . this should be accomplished by non - perturbative analysis of the string equation as is in the two - cut one - matrix models @xcite . * since we have known about macroscopic loop amplitudes in the @xmath0 symmetric critical points , it should be interesting to identify the liouville continuum formulation corresponding to the @xmath0 symmetric critical points . * to see the relation to minimal fractional superstring theory , we need to calculate the amplitudes in the @xmath0 symmetry breaking critical points . since minimal fractional superstring theory is a natural generalization of bosonic and super string theories , the formula could be probably written by the jacobi polynomials of the ultraspherical sequence , @xmath394 . * one of the important features of the multi - cut matrix models is the @xmath0 charge of d - branes . in this sense , it should be important to see the annulus amplitude of macroscopic loop amplitudes @xcite . to see the correlations among @xmath0 charges through annulus amplitudes of the matrix models is also an interesting problem to be studied . * acknowledgment * the authors would like to thank shoichi kawamoto for the useful discussion and comments on this work . we also would like to thank chien - ho chen , wei - ming chen , kazuyuki furuuchi , pei - ming ho , hiroshi isono , shoichi kawamoto , jen - chi lee , feng - li lin , tomohisa takimi , dan tomino and wen - yu wen for attending minimal string study meeting and sharing valuable discussions . shih would like to show his gratitude to people in taiwan string focus group where most of the work has been done . ct is supported by national science council of taiwan under the contract no . 96 - 2112-m-021 - 002-my3 . the authors are also supported by national center for theoretical science under nsc no . 98 - 2119-m-002 - 001 . an intuitive understanding of the relation between the resolvents and orthonormal polynomials is following : there is a useful expression for the general orthonormal polynomials @xcite : @xmath395 here the expectation value is defined by path integral over the @xmath396 truncated matrices @xmath397 and @xmath398 as @xmath399 with @xmath400 . this implies the following powerful relation in the large @xmath401 limit , @xmath402 this relation has been argued and proved from several viewpoints @xcite @xcite @xcite . with this relation , solving the eigenvalue problems ( [ orthrecab ] ) and ( [ orthreccd ] ) in the large @xmath1 limit is translated into obtaining the resolvents of the matrix model . to compare our calculations with previous results in @xcite , we make a list of the critical potentials ( of real coefficients ) @xmath403 .. the gaussian integration over @xmath404 for the two - matrix model partition function gives back to the one - matrix models . however note that the potential @xmath403 here is defined as the usual one - matrix potential @xmath405 . ] note that our ( real - coefficient ) critical potentials are related to the ( complex - coefficient ) critical potentials in @xcite by replacing @xmath406 and @xmath407 . has a different meaning in the main text . ] the parameter @xmath312 corresponds to the critical point of eigenvalue ( @xmath408 ) , which one can always put zero , @xmath409 . the parameter @xmath410 is an irrelevant perturbation and essentially does not change the system but is necessary to obtain the critical points of odd @xmath411 ( one can always choose any finite non - zero number ) . @xmath412 the critical resolvents are @xmath413 defined by the operator @xmath414 as @xmath415 and @xmath416 here we turn on the coefficient @xmath418 in the potential @xmath419 and put @xmath250 . with suitable choices of the value of @xmath195 or @xmath90 ( one of them is a free parameter ) , we can obtain critical potentials with smaller coefficients . for example , two - cut @xmath420 unitary critical potential with @xmath38 is given as @xmath421 and one can see that the coefficients are larger than those of the @xmath250 case ( [ twocut(4,5)critiwtheta ] ) . also the critical point in eigenvalue space @xmath103 are chosen to be the origin @xmath422 . by making a shift of variable @xmath423 , we can eliminate the parameter @xmath312 like in appendix [ onematcritipotentials ] . [ [ the - unitary - cases ] ] the unitary cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the critical potential of the unitary cases @xmath424 ( i.e. @xmath239 unitary minimal superstrings ) are @xmath425 [ [ the - hat - phat - q - cases ] ] the @xmath18 cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials @xmath426 of general @xmath427 cases are @xmath428 [ [ mathbb - z_2-breaking - cases ] ] @xmath123 breaking cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the @xmath123 breaking critical potentials ( @xmath410 is a breaking parameter ) are @xmath429 note that the critical potentials of @xmath430-rotated models are obtained by the analytic continuation , @xmath407 . [ [ the - unitary - cases - hat - phat - q ] ] the unitary cases ( @xmath322 ) : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials of `` unitary '' cases @xmath424 are @xmath431 note that , for the case of @xmath318 , we consider the potential of @xmath432 . then the critical operator of @xmath433 is given as @xmath434 from the construction , the vicinity of @xmath435 is the @xmath436 critical point . in this class of solutions , we need to be careful about critical potentials with odd degrees . in general , negative roots for the critical potentials @xmath437 with @xmath438 , and the fermi sea is filled from origin to some point around the first negative root . however for @xmath318 , the fermi sea extends to negative infinity ( see eq . ( [ peq1cripotex ] ) with @xmath439 ) . hence we introduce a regularization parameter @xmath440 by eq . ( [ defepsilon ] ) . this will make the matrix model well - defined and we will also adjust the normalization factor @xmath195 accordingly . [ [ the - hat - phat - q1hat - q - cases ] ] the @xmath441 cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials @xmath442 and @xmath443 of the @xmath333 case are @xmath444 since there is no @xmath445 critical point in three - cut cases , the above @xmath445 critical potential should result in the @xmath446 critical point . [ [ the - hat - phat - q - cases-1 ] ] the @xmath18 cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials @xmath426 of general @xmath427 cases are @xmath447 [ [ the - unitary - cases - hat - phat - q-1 ] ] the unitary cases ( @xmath322 ) : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials of `` unitary '' cases @xmath424 are @xmath448 [ [ the - hat - phat - q1hat - q - cases-1 ] ] the @xmath441 cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials @xmath442 and @xmath443 of the @xmath333 case are @xmath449 since there is no @xmath446 critical point in the four - cut cases , the above @xmath446 critical potential should result in the @xmath450 critical point . [ [ the - hat - phat - q - cases-2 ] ] the @xmath18 cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials @xmath426 of general @xmath427 cases are @xmath451 [ [ the - unitary - cases - hat - phat - q-2 ] ] the unitary cases ( @xmath322 ) : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials of `` unitary '' cases @xmath424 are @xmath452 [ [ the - hat - phat - q1hat - q - cases-2 ] ] the @xmath441 cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials @xmath442 and @xmath443 of the @xmath333 case are @xmath453 [ [ the - hat - phat - q - cases-3 ] ] the @xmath18 cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials @xmath426 of general @xmath427 cases are @xmath454 we concentrate on the @xmath0 breaking critical points of the multi - cut matrix models which is characterized by the operators @xmath165 and @xmath172 of @xmath455 since they correspond to minimal fractional superstring theory @xcite . the parameter @xmath410 is the breaking parameter . the critical potentials of the @xmath34-rotated models are obtained by the analytic continuation , @xmath456 . we put @xmath250 . [ [ the - unitary - models - hat - qhat - p1 ] ] the unitary models @xmath457 : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials @xmath458 of the unitary @xmath459 cases ( unitary minimal fractional superstring theory ) are @xmath460 & \hspace{8cm}\bigl(\theta= 5 + 21 \epsilon,\quad \epsilon \neq 1\bigr ) , \\[2pt ] & \underline{(\hat p,\hat q)=(2,3)}\quad \left\ { \begin{array}{l } { \displaystyle}v_1^{(3)}(x)= 3 g x^2 + \frac{13 x^3}{3 } -\frac{12 g x^5 } { 5 } -\frac{13 x^6}{6 } + \frac { g x^8}{8 } + \frac{x^9}{9 } , \cr { \displaystyle}v_2^{(2)}(y)= g y + \frac{5 g^2 y^2 } { 2 } -\frac{13 y^3}{3 } -\frac{5 g y^4 } { 4 } + \frac{y^6}{6 } , \end{array } \right . { \nonumber}\\ & \hspace{8cm}(\theta = 26 ) . \end{aligned}\ ] ] [ [ the - hat - phat - q1hat - q - cases-3 ] ] the @xmath441 cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the critical potentials @xmath461 and @xmath443 are @xmath462 [ [ the - unitary - models - hat - qhat - p1 - 1 ] ] the unitary models @xmath457 : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials @xmath458 of the unitary @xmath459 cases ( unitary minimal fractional superstring theory ) are @xmath463 & \hspace{8cm}\bigl(\theta= 2 ( 4 + 15 \epsilon ) , \quad \epsilon \neq 1\bigr ) , \\[2pt ] & \underline{(\hat p,\hat q)=(2,3)}{\nonumber}\\ & \left\ { \begin{array}{l } { \displaystyle}v_1^{(3)}(x)= -\frac{25 g}{3 } x^3 -13 x^4 + \frac{125 g}{7 } x^7 + \frac{143 x^8}{8 } -\frac{25 g}{11 } x^{11 } -\frac{13 x^{12}}{6 } + \frac{g}{15 } x^{15 } + \frac{x^{16}}{16},\cr { \displaystyle}v_2^{(2)}(y)= g y + \frac{7 g^2}{2 } y^2 -\frac{13 y^4}{2 } -\frac{7 g}{5 } y^5 + \frac{y^8}{8 } , \end{array } \right . { \nonumber}\\ & \hspace{8 cm } ( \theta=65).\end{aligned}\ ] ] [ [ the - hat - phat - q1hat - q - cases-4 ] ] the @xmath441 cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the critical potentials @xmath461 and @xmath443 are @xmath464 [ [ the - unitary - models - hat - qhat - p1 - 2 ] ] the unitary models @xmath457 : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the potentials @xmath458 of the unitary @xmath459 cases ( unitary minimal fractional superstring theory ) are @xmath465 [ [ the - hat - phat - q1hat - q - cases-5 ] ] the @xmath441 cases : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the critical potentials @xmath461 and @xmath443 are @xmath466 in this appendix , we make a detailed analysis of the string equation in the three - cut matrix models . ] based on the formalism of @xmath2-component kp hierarchy @xcite@xcite . the motivation behind this analysis is to check that our ansatz ( [ cisyansatz ] ) corresponds to a special solution of lax pairs . on the other hand , the complete analysis also provides useful hints for other solutions in the multi - cut matrix models . the realization of @xmath0 symmetric @xmath18 critical points have been shown in eq s ( [ tolax1 ] ) and ( [ tolax2 ] ) . here we drop some irrelevant factors and the following simplified notation is used : @xmath467 the coefficient matrices @xmath468 and @xmath469 are all real functions . then the lax operators @xmath470 and @xmath471 are defined as @xmath472 with @xmath473 = [ { \boldsymbol{p}},{\boldsymbol{l}}]=0 $ ] and @xmath474 , and @xmath475 in the following discussion , we put @xmath476 for simplicity . the relation @xmath477 can be easily solved if derivative terms are neglected : @xmath478 with @xmath479 . the bracket @xmath480 is a totally symmetric product which is defined by @xmath481 here we define @xmath482\bigr],\qquad f = f^{(\rm diag)}+f^{(\rm off)}. \end{aligned}\ ] ] in the kp hierarchy basis @xmath483 , they are truly a diagonal part and an off - diagonal part of the matrix @xmath484 . since we impose the @xmath0 symmetry here , the kp operator @xmath19 corresponding to the matrix operator @xmath75 is given in eq s ( [ tolax1 ] ) and ( [ tolax2 ] ) as @xmath485 with @xmath486 then the equation @xmath473=0 $ ] gives @xmath487\bigr ] + ( \text{derivative terms } ) . \end{aligned}\ ] ] the operator @xmath20 for the @xmath333 case can be written @xcite as @xmath488 with @xmath489 . then the string equation can be easily derived from @xmath490.\end{aligned}\ ] ] one can easily see that @xmath491 ( mod . @xmath492 ) is not allowed as critical points . for example , in the first simplest case @xmath370 , the string equation is written as @xmath493+t \bigl[h,\gamma^2\bigr]\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath494 . below , by imposing the information of the matrix model ( [ finhpeq1 ] ) , we solve this string equation at the first order of string coupling . there are four asymptotic solutions : the first one is generalization of `` one - cut solution '' in two - cut matrix models : @xmath495 with a shift of @xmath277 , this corresponds to our solution ( [ cisysol ] ) with the choice of @xmath382 . the others @xmath496 are essentially expressed as @xmath497 with @xmath498 they all satisfy @xmath499 . note that the forms of @xmath500 and @xmath501 @xmath496 are different from each other but eigenvalues are the same . with a shift of @xmath277 , this is equivalent to our ansatz ( [ cisyansatz ] ) and the solution ( [ cisysol ] ) of @xmath372 . we also note that the douglas equation , @xmath220=g_{str}i_3 $ ] , requires the following first order correction of string coupling : @xmath502 with @xmath503 this kind of first order correction can not be realized by the ordering problem of @xmath277 and @xmath121 like in the two - cut cases ( [ 2cutsoldkk ] ) . we consider the background @xmath504 . there are five asymptotic solutions : the first one is a generalization of `` one - cut solution '' in two - cut matrix models : @xmath505 other three solutions @xmath496 are essentially expressed as @xmath506 with @xmath507 these solutions precisely correspond to the ansatz ( [ cisyansatz ] ) . the last solution is different from the ansatz ( [ cisyansatz ] ) , and can be expressed as @xmath508 the functions @xmath509 and @xmath510 in @xmath511 ( see ( [ finhpeq1 ] ) ) are related as @xmath512 it would be of interest to make further study of these solutions . the kp operator @xmath19 which corresponds to the matrix operator @xmath165 is given in eq s ( [ tolax1 ] ) and ( [ tolax2 ] ) as @xmath513 with @xmath514 then the equation @xmath473=0 $ ] gives @xmath515+[h_2,s_{n-2 } ] \bigr ) \bigr ] + ( \text{derivative terms } ) . \end{aligned}\ ] ] the operator @xmath20 and the string equation for the @xmath378 case can be written as @xmath516 = g_{str } i_3.\end{aligned}\ ] ] there are also several equivalent solutions like the 2nd , 3rd and 4th solutions of the @xmath370 and @xmath446 cases . here we only list representative solutions . the first solution is the counterpart of the one - cut solution : there are three equivalent expressions . one of them is given as @xmath517 the parameter @xmath518 is fixed by the douglas equation @xmath220=g_{str}i_3 $ ] . this case is also related to our solution ( [ cisysol ] ) of @xmath382 . the second solution corresponds to our ansatz ( [ cisyansatz ] ) : there are also three expressions and one of them is given as @xmath519 the parameter @xmath518 is fixed by the douglas equation @xmath220=g_{str}i_3 $ ] . this case is also related to our solution ( [ cisysol ] ) of @xmath372 . here we write some basic facts about the jacobi polynomials , which we have used in this paper . some standard reference is @xcite , for example . the jacobi polynomial @xmath327 is a solution of the hypergeometric equation , @xmath520p_n^{(\alpha,\beta)}(z)=0,\label{jacobieq}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and is defined by @xmath521.\end{aligned}\ ] ] they are orthogonal polynomials with respect to the following inner product : @xmath522 the jacobi polynomials are related to other famous polynomials . the gegenbauer polynomials , @xmath523 , and the legendre polynomials , @xmath524 , are @xmath525 the chebyshev polynomials of the first kind , @xmath526 , and the second kind , @xmath527 , are @xmath528 ^ 2}\ , u_n(z).\end{aligned}\ ] ] they are also called the ultraspherical polynomials @xmath529 . the twisted type of ultraspherical polynomials , @xmath530 @xcite , can include the chebyshev polynomials of the third kind , @xmath531 , and the forth kind , @xmath338 : @xmath532 so we can see that @xmath533 . some useful relations are in order : + @xmath534 @xmath535 @xmath536 @xmath537 here we check that our formula ( [ cisysol ] ) @xmath538{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^l\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{k - l } } , { \nonumber}\\ \xi_{\hat q}(z ) & = p^{(-\frac{2l - k}{k},\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat q-1}(z ) \ , \sqrt[k]{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^{k - l}\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{l } } , \end{aligned}\ ] ] generally satisfies eq . ( [ dkkeq ] ) @xmath539 in the case of @xmath322 . for sake of simplicity , we neglect normalization factors . what we need to show is that the derivative of eq . ( [ dkkeq2 ] ) vanishes , @xmath540 we first calculate @xmath541 as follows : @xmath542{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^l\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{k - l}}\,+{\nonumber}\\ & \qquad\quad\quad + 2\ , { \partial}_z p^{(\frac{2l - k}{k},-\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z ) \times { \partial}_z \bigl(\sqrt[k]{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^l\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{k - l}}\bigr)+{\nonumber}\\[3pt ] & \qquad\quad\quad + p^{(\frac{2l - k}{k},-\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z ) \times { \partial}_z^2\bigl(\sqrt[k]{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^l\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{k - l}}\bigr ) \biggr ] { \nonumber}\\ & = p^{(-\frac{2l - k}{k},\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z ) \biggl [ ( z^2 - 1)\ , { \partial}_z^2 p^{(\frac{2l - k}{k},-\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z ) + { \nonumber}\\ & \qquad+ 2\bigl(z+\dfrac{l}{k}-\dfrac{k - l}{k}\bigr)\ , { \partial}_z p^{(\frac{2l - k}{k},-\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z ) - \dfrac{4\dfrac{l}{k}\bigl(\dfrac{k - l}{k}\bigr)}{z^2 - 1 } p^{(\frac{2l - k}{k},-\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z ) \biggr ] { \nonumber}\\[3pt ] & = \biggl [ -\dfrac{4\dfrac{l}{k}\bigl(\dfrac{k - l}{k}\bigr)}{z^2 - 1 } + \hat p(\hat p-1 ) \biggr ] p^{(-\frac{2l - k}{k},\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z)\times p^{(\frac{2l - k}{k},-\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z)\end{aligned}\ ] ] here we use the following relations , @xmath543{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^{k - l}\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{l}}\times \sqrt[k]{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^l\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{k - l } } & = z^2 - 1 , \\[5pt ] \sqrt[k]{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^{k - l}\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{l}}\ , \frac{{\partial}}{{\partial}z } \bigl(\sqrt[k]{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^l\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{k - l}}\bigr ) & = z+\dfrac{l}{k}-\dfrac{k - l}{k } , \\ \sqrt[k]{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^{k - l}\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{l}}\ , \frac{{\partial}^2}{{\partial}z^2 } \bigl(\sqrt[k]{\bigl(z-1\bigr)^l\bigl(z+1\bigr)^{k - l}}\bigr ) & = -\dfrac{4\dfrac{l}{k}\bigl(\dfrac{k - l}{k}\bigr)}{z^2 - 1},\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the differential equation ( [ jacobieq ] ) , @xmath544p^{(\frac{2l - k}{k},-\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z ) = \hat p(\hat p-1)\,p^{(\frac{2l - k}{k},-\frac{2l - k}{k})}_{\hat p-1}(z ) . \end{aligned}\ ] ] since the calculation of @xmath545 is similar to that of @xmath541 by exchanging the two indices : @xmath546 and one concludes @xmath547 this is the equation ( [ derdkkeq ] ) . one can calculate the constant in eq . ( [ dkkeq2 ] ) and fix the normalization of eq . ( [ cisysol ] ) by using eq s ( [ jacobinormalization1 ] ) and ( [ jacobinormalization2 ] ) . here we summarize basic properties of cubic roots of analytic functions and the topology of associated riemann surface , which serves as the simplest prototype of general @xmath2-th root cases . in the case of cubic root of a single complex variable , @xmath548{z^l}\ , \to\ , \sqrt[3]{(e^{2\pi i}z)^l } = \omega^{l } \sqrt[3]{z^l } \qquad ( l=0,1,2,\cdots),\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can define the charge @xmath549 of the branch point @xmath550 , according to the power of the fundamental phase @xmath97 , as @xmath551 . one can have branch cuts in the complex plane which connect branch points with vanishing total charges , @xmath552 . for cubic roots of an analytic function , there are two types of branch cuts : \(i ) type i branch cut connects two branch points of opposite charges . one concrete example is given by @xmath553{(z - a)(z - b)^2}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here the branch point @xmath554 carries charge @xmath555 , and the branch point @xmath556 carries charge @xmath557 . the geometry of the associated riemann surface is given in fig . [ cubicroot1](a ) . by cutting the three complex planes along the branch cuts and gluing the six edges according to the identification rule , we can see clearly that the topology of the type i branch cut is given by a simple junction of the three sheets , as shown in fig . [ cubicroot1](b ) . \(ii ) type ii branch cut connects three branch points of identical charges . one concrete example is given by @xmath558{(z - a)(z - a\omega)(z - a\omega^2 ) } = \sqrt[3]{z^3-a^3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here all three branch points @xmath559 carry charge @xmath555 . the geometry of the associated riemann surface is given in fig . [ cubicroot2](a ) . by cutting the three complex planes along the branch cuts and flipping the resulting complex plane into a hexagon ( including the point at infinity ) , one can transform the identification rule in fig . [ cubicroot2](a ) for three complex planes into a gluing rule for three hexagons . hence , the topology of the type ii branch cut is the same as that of a torus ( fig . [ cubicroot2](b ) ) . indicate the way of connection around the branch point @xmath560 . b ) cut the cuts out and open them up . after gluing the sheets , one can observe that the topology is torus . that is , the topological role of the second type cut is a junction of the three sheets with a torus . ] a. m. polyakov , `` quantum geometry of bosonic strings , '' phys . b * 103 * ( 1981 ) 207 ; `` quantum geometry of fermionic strings , '' phys . b * 103 * ( 1981 ) 211 . v. g. knizhnik , a. m. polyakov and a. b. zamolodchikov , `` fractal structure of 2d - quantum gravity , '' mod . lett . a * 3 * ( 1988 ) 819 . f. david , `` conformal field theories coupled to 2-d gravity in the conformal gauge , '' mod . phys . a * 3 * ( 1988 ) 1651 ; + j. distler and h. kawai , `` conformal field theory and 2-d quantum gravity , or who s afraid of joseph liouville ? , '' nucl . b * 321 * ( 1989 ) 509 . e. brezin and v. a. kazakov , `` exactly solvable field theories of closed strings , '' phys . lett . b * 236 * ( 1990 ) 144 ; + m. r. douglas and s. h. shenker , nucl . b * 335 * ( 1990 ) 635 ; + d. j. gross and a. a. migdal , `` nonperturbative two - dimensional quantum gravity , '' phys . * 64 * ( 1990 ) 127 . e. brezin , m. r. douglas , v. kazakov and s. h. shenker , `` the ising model coupled to 2-d gravity : a nonperturbative analysis , '' phys . b * 237 * ( 1990 ) 43 ; + d. j. gross and a. a. migdal , `` nonperturbative solution of the ising model on a random surface , '' phys . * 64 * ( 1990 ) 717 . d. j. gross and a. a. migdal , `` a nonperturbative treatment of two - dimensional quantum gravity , '' nucl . b * 340 * ( 1990 ) 333 . j. mcgreevy and h. l. verlinde , `` strings from tachyons : the @xmath561 matrix reloaded , '' jhep * 0312 * ( 2003 ) 054 [ arxiv : hep - th/0304224 ] . d. gaiotto and l. rastelli , `` a paradigm of open / closed duality : liouville d - branes and the kontsevich model , '' jhep * 0507 * ( 2005 ) 053 [ arxiv : hep - th/0312196 ] . d. j. gross and e. witten , `` possible third order phase transition in the large n lattice gauge theory , '' phys . d * 21 * ( 1980 ) 446 . v. periwal and d. shevitz , `` unitary matrix models as exactly solvable string theories , '' phys . lett . * 64 * ( 1990 ) 1326 ; `` exactly solvable unitary matrix models : multicritical potentials and correlations , '' nucl . b * 344 * ( 1990 ) 731 . m. r. douglas , n. seiberg and s. h. shenker , `` flow and instability in quantum gravity , '' phys . b * 244 * ( 1990 ) 381 . c. r. nappi , `` painleve - ii and odd polynomials , '' mod . lett . a * 5 * ( 1990 ) 2773 . c. crnkovic , m. r. douglas and g. w. moore , `` loop equations and the topological phase of multi - cut matrix models , '' int . j. mod . phys . a * 7 * ( 1992 ) 7693 [ arxiv : hep - th/9108014 ] . t. j. hollowood , l. miramontes , a. pasquinucci and c. nappi , `` hermitian versus anti - hermitian one matrix models and their hierarchies , '' nucl . b * 373 * ( 1992 ) 247 [ arxiv : hep - th/9109046 ] . t. takayanagi and n. toumbas , `` a matrix model dual of type 0b string theory in two dimensions , '' jhep * 0307 * ( 2003 ) 064 [ arxiv : hep - th/0307083 ] . m. r. douglas , i. r. klebanov , d. kutasov , j. m. maldacena , e. j. martinec and n. seiberg , `` a new hat for the @xmath561 matrix model , '' arxiv : hep - th/0307195 . i. r. klebanov , j. m. maldacena and n. seiberg , `` unitary and complex matrix models as 1-d type 0 strings , '' commun . * 252 * ( 2004 ) 275 [ arxiv : hep - th/0309168 ] . c. crnkovic and g. w. moore , `` multicritical multicut matrix models , '' phys . b * 257 * ( 1991 ) 322 . h. irie , `` fractional supersymmetric liouville theory and the multi - cut matrix models , '' nucl . b * 819 * ( 2009 ) 351 [ arxiv:0902.1676 [ hep - th ] ] . e. brezin , c. itzykson , g. parisi and j. b. zuber , `` planar diagrams , '' commun . * 59 * ( 1978 ) 35 . v. a. kazakov , `` the appearance of matter fields from quantum fluctuations of 2d gravity , '' mod . a * 4 * ( 1989 ) 2125 . i. k. kostov , `` strings embedded in dynkin diagrams , '' cargese 1990 , proceedings , random surfaces and quantum gravity , pp.135 - 149 . i. k. kostov , `` loop amplitudes for nonrational string theories , '' phys . b * 266 * ( 1991 ) 317 . i. k. kostov , `` strings with discrete target space , '' nucl . phys . b * 376 * ( 1992 ) 539 [ arxiv : hep - th/9112059 ] . t. banks , m. r. douglas , n. seiberg and s. h. shenker , `` microscopic and macroscopic loops in nonperturbative two - dimensional gravity , '' phys . b * 238 * ( 1990 ) 279 . g. w. moore , n. seiberg and m. staudacher , `` from loops to states in 2-d quantum gravity , '' nucl . b * 362 * ( 1991 ) 665 . j. m. daul , v. a. kazakov and i. k. kostov , `` rational theories of 2-d gravity from the two matrix model , '' nucl . b * 409 * ( 1993 ) 311 [ arxiv : hep - th/9303093 ] . m. fukuma and s. yahikozawa , `` comments on d - instantons in c @xmath562 1 strings , '' phys . b * 460 * ( 1999 ) 71 [ arxiv : hep - th/9902169 ] . j. m. maldacena , g. w. moore , n. seiberg and d. shih , `` exact vs. semiclassical target space of the minimal string , '' jhep * 0410 * ( 2004 ) 020 [ arxiv : hep - th/0408039 ] . m. r. douglas , `` strings in less than one - dimension and the generalized kdv hierarchies , '' phys . b * 238 * ( 1990 ) 176 . t. tada and m. yamaguchi , `` @xmath563 and @xmath11 operator analysis for two matrix model , '' phys . b * 250 * ( 1990 ) 38 ; + m. r. douglas , _ in * cargese 1990 , proceedings , random surfaces and quantum gravity * 77 - 83 . ( see high energy physics index 30 ( 1992 ) no . 17911 ) _ ; + t. tada , `` @xmath564 critical point from two matrix models , '' phys . b * 259 * ( 1991 ) 442 . m. fukuma , h. irie and y. matsuo , `` notes on the algebraic curves in @xmath13 minimal string theory , '' jhep * 0609 * ( 2006 ) 075 [ arxiv : hep - th/0602274 ] . m. fukuma and h. irie , `` a string field theoretical description of @xmath13 minimal superstrings , '' jhep * 0701 * ( 2007 ) 037 [ arxiv : hep - th/0611045 ] . n. seiberg and d. shih , `` branes , rings and matrix models in minimal ( super)string theory , '' jhep * 0402 * ( 2004 ) 021 [ arxiv : hep - th/0312170 ] . v. a. kazakov and i. k. kostov , `` instantons in non - critical strings from the two - matrix model , '' arxiv : hep - th/0403152 . a. sato and a. tsuchiya , `` zz brane amplitudes from matrix models , '' jhep * 0502 * ( 2005 ) 032 [ arxiv : hep - th/0412201 ] . n. seiberg and d. shih , `` flux vacua and branes of the minimal superstring , '' jhep * 0501 * ( 2005 ) 055 [ arxiv : hep - th/0412315 ] . m. fukuma , h. irie and s. seki , `` comments on the d - instanton calculus in @xmath565 minimal string theory , '' nucl . b * 728 * ( 2005 ) 67 [ arxiv : hep - th/0505253 ] . n. ishibashi , t. kuroki and a. yamaguchi , `` universality of nonperturbative effects in @xmath566 noncritical string theory , '' jhep * 0509 * ( 2005 ) 043 [ arxiv : hep - th/0507263 ] . f. david , `` phases of the large n matrix model and nonperturbative effects in 2-d gravity , '' nucl . b * 348 * ( 1991 ) 507 ; nonperturbative effects in matrix models and vacua of two - dimensional phys . b * 302 * ( 1993 ) 403 [ arxiv : hep - th/9212106 ] . p. h. ginsparg and j. zinn - justin , `` action principle and large order behavior of nonperturbative gravity , '' b. eynard and j. zinn - justin , `` large order behavior of 2-d gravity coupled to @xmath567 matter , '' phys . lett . b * 302 * ( 1993 ) 396 [ arxiv : hep - th/9301004 ] . m. fukuma and s. yahikozawa , `` nonperturbative effects in noncritical strings with soliton backgrounds , '' phys . b * 396 * ( 1997 ) 97 [ arxiv : hep - th/9609210 ] ; `` combinatorics of solitons in noncritical string theory , '' phys . b * 393 * ( 1997 ) 316 [ arxiv : hep - th/9610199 ] ; v. fateev , a. b. zamolodchikov and al . b. zamolodchikov , `` boundary liouville field theory . i : boundary state and boundary two - point function , '' arxiv : hep - th/0001012 ; + j. teschner , `` remarks on liouville theory with boundary , '' arxiv : hep - th/0009138 . a. b. zamolodchikov and al . b. zamolodchikov , `` liouville field theory on a pseudosphere , '' arxiv : hep - th/0101152 . m. l. mehta , `` a method of integration over matrix variables , '' commun . phys . * 79 * , 327 ( 1981 ) . e. j. martinec , `` on the origin of integrability in matrix models , '' commun . * 138 * ( 1991 ) 437 . m. fukuma , h. kawai and r. nakayama , `` continuum schwinger - dyson equations and universal structures in two - dimensional quantum gravity , '' int . j. mod . phys . a * 6 * ( 1991 ) 1385 ; `` infinite dimensional grassmannian structure of two - dimensional quantum gravity , '' commun . * 143 * ( 1992 ) 371 ; `` explicit solution for @xmath568@xmath569 duality in two - dimensional quantum gravity , '' commun . * 148 * ( 1992 ) 101 . n. kawahara , j. nishimura and a. yamaguchi , `` monte carlo approach to nonperturbative strings demonstration in noncritical string theory , '' jhep * 0706 * ( 2007 ) 076 [ arxiv : hep - th/0703209 ] . k. okuyama , `` annulus amplitudes in the minimal superstring , '' jhep * 0504 * ( 2005 ) 002 [ arxiv : hep - th/0503082 ] . h. irie , `` notes on d - branes and dualities in @xmath13 minimal superstring theory , '' nucl . phys . b * 794 * [ pm ] ( 2008 ) 402 [ arxiv:0706.4471 hep - th ] . g. w. moore , `` geometry of the string equations , '' commun . math . * 133 * ( 1990 ) 261 ; `` matrix models of 2-d gravity and isomonodromic deformation , '' prog . * 102 * ( 1990 ) 255 . m. sato , rims kokyuroku * 439 * ( 1981 ) 30 ; + e. date , m. jimbo , m. kashiwara and t. miwa , `` transformation groups for soliton equations . operator approach to the kadomtsev - petviashvili equation , '' rims-358 ; + m. jimbo and t. miwa , `` solitons and infinite dimensional lie algebras , '' publ . kyoto * 19 * ( 1983 ) 943 ; + v. g. kac and j. w. van de leur , `` the @xmath56-component kp hierarchy and representation theory , '' j. math . * 44 * ( 2003 ) 3245 [ arxiv : hep - th/9308137 ] . i. krichever , `` the dispersionless lax equations and topological minimal models , '' commun . * 143 * ( 1992 ) 415 . g. e. andrews , r. askey and r. roy , `` special functions , encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications 71 , '' cambridge university press ( 1999 ) 684 p. Abstract:
[ "multi - cut critical points and their macroscopic loop amplitudes are studied in the multi - cut two - matrix models , based on an extension of the prescription developed by daul , kazakov and kostov . after identifying possible critical points and potentials in the multi - cut matrix models , we calculate the macroscopic loop amplitudes in the @xmath0 symmetric background . with a natural large @xmath1 ansatz for the matrix lax operators , a sequence of new solutions for the amplitudes in the @xmath0 symmetric @xmath2-cut two - matrix models are obtained , which are realized by the jacobi polynomials . arxiv:0909.1197 + september 2009 * macroscopic loop amplitudes + in the multi - cut two - matrix models * chuan - tsung chan@xmath3 , hirotaka irie@xmath4 , sheng - yu darren shih@xmath5 and chi - hsien yeh@xmath4 _ @xmath6department of physics , tunghai university , taiwan , 40704 + @xmath7department of physics and center for theoretical sciences , + national taiwan university , taipei 10617 , taiwan , r.o.c + @xmath8department of physics , university of california , berkeley , ca 94720 - 7300 _" ]
15,142
15,142
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: for the past several decades since the discovery of pulsars , many authors have investigated the properties of dense matter which exist inside neutron stars and supernova cores ( see , e.g. , refs . these objects have been shown that they consist of a variety of material phases whose physical properties reflect in many astrophysical phenomena of these objects . especially , the properties of nuclear matter under extreme conditions , which is one of the essential topics for understanding the mechanism of collapse - driven supernovae @xcite , the structure of neutron star crusts @xcite and its relating phenomena , have been studied actively . this subject is also interesting as one of the fundamental problems of the complex fluids of nucleons . at subnuclear densities , nuclear matter exhibits the coexistence of a liquid phase with a gas phase due to the internucleon interaction which has an attractive part . at sufficiently low temperatures relevant to neutron star interiors , and sufficiently below the normal nuclear density , long - range coulomb interactions make the system divide periodically into gas and spherical liquid drops , adding a crystalline property to the liquid - gas coexistence . in the density region where nuclei are about to melt into uniform matter , it is expected that the energetically favorable configuration of the mixed phase possesses interesting spatial structures such as rodlike and slablike nuclei and rodlike and spherical bubbles , etc . , which are referred to as nuclear `` pasta '' . this picture was originally proposed by ravenhall et al . @xcite and hashimoto et al . @xcite independently . their predictions both based on free energy calculations with liquid drop models assuming some specific nuclear shapes . these works clarify that the most energetically stable nuclear shape is determined by a subtle balance between the nuclear surface and coulomb energies . detailed aspects of equilibrium phase diagrams , such as a series of nuclear shapes which can be realized as the energetically most favorable and the density range corresponding to the phases with nonspherical nuclei , vary with nuclear models @xcite . however , the realization of the `` pasta '' phases as energy minimum states can be seen in a wide range of nuclear models and the phase diagrams possess an universal basic feature that , with increasing density , the shape of the nuclear matter region changes like sphere @xmath4 cylinder @xmath4 slab @xmath4 cylindrical hole @xmath4 spherical hole @xmath4 uniform @xcite . this feature is also reproduced by the thomas - fermi calculations by several groups @xcite . the phases with these exotic nuclear structures , if they were realized in neutron star crusts or supernova cores , bring about many astrophysical consequences . as for those in neutron star phenomena , it is interesting to note the relevance of nonspherical nuclei to pulsar glitches and cooling of neutron stars . although the question whether the mechanism of pulsar glitches is depicted by vortex pinning model or star quake model has yet to be settled completely , the existence of nonspherical nuclei in neutron star matter ( nsm ) have significant effects in both cases . as for the former , while the force needed to pin vortices has yet to be clarified completely even for a bcc lattice of spherical nuclei mainly due to the uncertain properties of impurities and defects @xcite , the effect of spatial structure of normal nuclear matter on vortex dynamics can not be ignored . as for the latter , the existence of `` pasta '' phases with slablike and rodlike nuclei would change the elastic properties of inner crust matter from those of crystalline solid to those of liquid crystal as indicated by pethick and potekhin @xcite , which results in significant decrease of the maximum elastic energy that can be stored in the inner crust . the presence of nonspherical nuclei would also accelerate the cooling of the corresponding region of neutron stars by opening semileptonic weak processes which are unlikely to occur for spherical nuclei @xcite . `` pasta '' phases in supernova matter ( snm ) are expected to affect the neutrino transport and hydrodynamics in supernova cores . let us first note that the neutrino wavelengths , typically of order 20 fm , are comparable to or even greater than the internuclear spacing , leading to diffractive effects on the neutrino elastic scattering off such a periodic spatial structure of nuclear matter @xcite . these effects , induced by the internuclear coulombic correlations , would reduce the scattering rates and hence the lepton fraction @xmath5 . for the bcc lattice of spherical nuclei , such a reduction was examined by horowitz @xcite by calculating the associated static structure factor . it is also noteworthy that nonspherical nuclei and bubbles are elongated in specific direction . in such direction , the neutrino scattering processes are no longer coherent , in contrast to the case of roughly spherical nuclei whose finiteness in any direction yields constructive interference in the scattering . the final point to be mentioned is that the changes in the nuclear shape are accompanied by discontinuities in the adiabatic index , denoting how hard the equation of state of the material is . these discontinuities may influence the core hydrodynamics during the initial phase of the collapse @xcite . though the properties of `` pasta '' phases in equilibrium state have been investigated actively , the formation and the melting processes of these phases have not been discussed except for some limited cases which are based on perturbative approaches @xcite . it is important to adopt a microscopic and dynamical approach which allows arbitrary nuclear structures in order to understand these processes of nonspherical nuclei . at finite temperatures , it is considered that not only nuclear surface becomes obscure but also nuclei of various shapes may coexist . therefore , it is necessary to incorporate density fluctuations without any assumptions on nuclear shape to investigate the properties of `` pasta '' phases at finite temperatures . although the works done by williams and koonin @xcite and lassaut et al . @xcite do not assume nuclear structure , they can not incorporate fluctuations of nucleon distributions in a satisfying level because they are based on the thomas - fermi calculation , which is one - body approximation . in addition , only a single structure is contained in the simulation box in these works , there are thus possibilities that nuclear shape is strongly affected by boundary effect and some structures are prohibited implicitly . in the present work , we study the structure of cold dense matter at subnuclear densities in the framework of quantum molecular dynamics ( qmd ) @xcite , which is one of the molecular dynamics ( md ) approaches for nucleon many - body systems ( see , e.g. , ref . @xcite for review ) . md for nucleons including qmd , which is a microscopic and dynamical method without any assumptions on nuclear structure , is suitable for incorporating fluctuations of particle distributions . previously , we have reported the first results of our study on nuclear `` pasta '' by qmd , which demonstrated that the `` pasta '' phases can be formed in a dynamical way for matter with proton fractions @xmath6 and 0.5 @xcite . in this full paper , we present new results for astrophysically interesting neutron - rich matter of @xmath7 in addition to the cases of @xmath6 and 0.5 reported before . the plan of this paper is as follows . in section ii , we describe the framework of the qmd model used in the present study . we then show the results of our simulations in section iii and analyze the structure of matter obtained by the simulations using two - point correlation functions and minkowski functionals in section iv . in section v , we investigate the properties of the effective nuclear interaction used in this work in order to examine the validity of our results in terms of nuclear forces . astrophysical discussions are given in section vi . summary and conclusions are presented in section vii . we have various types of molecular dynamics methods for nucleons including representative ones such as fermionic molecular dynamics ( fmd ) @xcite , antisymmetrized molecular dynamics ( amd ) @xcite and qmd , etc . in the present work , we choose qmd among them balancing between calculation cost and accuracy . the typical length scale @xmath8 of inter - structure is @xmath9 fm and the density region of interest is just below the normal nuclear density @xmath10 . the required nucleon number @xmath11 in order to reproduce @xmath12 unit structures in the simulation box is about @xmath13 ( for slabs ) . it is thus desirable that we prepare nucleons of order 10000 if we try to reduce boundary effects down to a satisfactory level by reproducing several several unit structures in the box . while it is a hard task to treat such a large system with , for example , fmd and amd whose calculation costs scale as @xmath14 , it is feasible to do it with qmd whose calculation costs scale as @xmath15 . this difference comes from summations in the slater determinants in the trial wave functions of the former models . in qmd , on the other hand , the total @xmath11-nucleon wave function @xmath16 is assumed to be a direct product of single - nucleon states @xmath17 : @xmath18 the single - nucleon state is represented by a gaussian wave packet : @xmath19}\ , \label{packet}\ ] ] where @xmath20 and @xmath21 are the centers of position and momentum of the packet @xmath22 , respectively , and @xmath23 is a parameter related to the extension of the wave packet in the coordinate space . it is also noted that we mainly focus on the macroscopic structures ; the exchange effect would not be so important for them . this can be seen by comparing the typical values of the exchange energy for the macroscopic scale and of the energy difference between two successive phases with nonspherical nuclei . suppose there are two identical nucleons , @xmath24 and 2 , bound in different nuclei each other . the exchange energy between these particles is calculated as an exchange integral : @xmath25 where @xmath26 is the potential energy . an asymptotic form of the wave function is given by @xmath27 with @xmath28 and @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the binding energy and @xmath31 is the nucleon mass . the exchange integral reads @xmath32 } \sim 5 \times 10^{-6 } { \rm mev}\ ] ] for the internuclear distance @xmath33 fm and @xmath34 mev , which is extremely smaller than the typical energy difference per nucleon between the `` pasta '' phases of order 0.1 kev ( for nsm , see fig . 4 in ref . @xcite ) - 10 kev ( for snm , see fig . 4 in ref . therefore , it is expected that qmd , which is less elaborate in treating the exchange effect , is not bad approximation for investigating the nuclear `` pasta '' . consequently , qmd has the advantages over the other models in the present study . in the future , we will have to confirm the validity of the results obtained by qmd using other more elaborate model such as amd or fmd to treat the exchange effect more precicely . however , this problem is beyond the scope of the present work . to simulate nuclear matter at subnuclear densities within the framework of qmd , we use a qmd model hamiltonian developed by maruyama et al . @xcite , which is constructed so as to reproduce bulk properties of nuclear matter and properties of finite nuclei . this model hamiltonian consists of the following six terms @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the kinetic energy , @xmath37 is the pauli potential introduced to reproduce the pauli principle effectively , @xmath38 is the skyrme potential which consists of an attractive two - body term and a repulsive three - body term , @xmath39 is the symmetry potential , @xmath40 is the momentum - dependent potential introduced as two fock terms of the yukawa interaction and @xmath41 is the coulomb potential . the expressions of these terms are given as @xmath42 } \ \delta_{\tau_i \tau_j } \delta_{\sigma_i \sigma_j}\ , \label{pauli}\\ v_{\rm skyrme } & = & { \alpha\over 2\rho_0}\sum_{i , j ( \neq i ) } \rho_{ij } + { \beta\over ( 1+\tau)\ \rho_0^{\tau } } \sum_i \left [ \sum_{j ( \neq i ) } \int { d^3{\bf r } \ \tilde{\rho_i}({\bf r } ) \ \tilde{\rho_j}({\bf r } ) } \right]^{\tau}\ , \label{skyrme}\\ v_{\rm sym } & = & { c_{\rm s}\over 2\rho_0 } \sum_{i , j(\neq i ) } \ , ( 1 - 2 | c_i - c_j | ) \ \label{sym}\\ v_{\rm md } & = & v_{\rm md}^{(1 ) } + v_{\rm md}^{(2 ) } \nonumber \\ & = & { c_{\rm ex}^{(1 ) } \over 2\rho_0 } \sum_{i , j(\neq i ) } { 1 \over 1+\left[{{\bf p}_i-{\bf p}_j \over \hbar \mu_1}\right]^2 } \ \rho_{ij } + { c_{\rm ex}^{(2 ) } \over 2\rho_0 } \sum_{i , j(\neq i ) } { 1 \over 1+\left[{{\bf p}_i-{\bf p}_j \over \hbar \mu_2}\right]^2 } \ \rho_{ij}\ , \label{md}\\ v_{\rm coulomb } & = & { e^2 \over 2}\sum_{i , j(\neq i ) } \left(\tau_{i}+\frac{1}{2}\right ) \ , \left(\tau_{j}+\frac{1}{2}\right ) \int\!\!\!\!\int d^3{\bf r}\,d^3{\bf r}^{\prime } { 1 \over|{\bf r}-{\bf r}^{\prime}| } \ , \rho_i({\bf r})\rho_j({\bf r}^{\prime})\ , \label{coulomb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath43 means the overlap between the single - nucleon densities , @xmath44 and @xmath45 , for @xmath22-th and @xmath46-th nucleons given as @xmath47 @xmath48 is the nucleon spin and @xmath49 is the isospin ( @xmath50 for protons and @xmath51 for neutrons ) and @xmath52 and @xmath23 are model parameters determined to reproduce the properties of the ground states of the finite nuclei , especially heavier ones , and the saturation properties of nuclear matter @xcite . a parameter set used in this work is shown in table [ parameter ] . the single - nucleon densities @xmath44 and @xmath53 are given by @xmath54}\ , \quad \\ \tilde{\rho_i}({\bf r } ) & = & \frac{1}{(2\pi \tilde{l})^{3/2}}\ \exp{\left [ - \frac{({\bf r } - { \bf r}_i)^2}{2\tilde{l } } \right]}\ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath55 the modified width @xmath56 in @xmath53 is introduced in the three - body term of skyrme interaction [ eq . ( [ skyrme ] ) ] to incorporate the effect of the repulsive density - dependent term . .effective interaction parameter set + ( incompressibility @xmath57=280 mev ; medium eos model in ref . @xcite ) [ cols="^,^,^,^ " , ] [ parameter ] we adopt qmd equations of motion with friction terms to simulate the dynamical relaxation : @xmath58 where the friction coefficients @xmath59 and @xmath60 are positive definite , which determine the relaxation time scale . the relaxation scheme given by eqs . ( [ qmdeom fric ] ) is referred to as the steepest descent method and it leads to the continuous decrease in @xmath61 as @xmath62 even though it is recognized that this method is not efficient , it is expected that the dynamics given by eqs . ( [ qmdeom fric ] ) with @xmath63 deviates slightly in a short period from the physically grounded dynamics given by qmd equations of motion without the friction terms [ equations without the second terms in the right - hand sides of eqs . ( [ qmdeom fric ] ) ] , which we would like to respect . we have performed qmd simulations of an infinite @xmath64 system with fixed proton fractions @xmath65 0.5 and 0.3 for various nucleon densities @xmath66 [ the density region is ( 0.05 - 1.0 ) @xmath67 . we set 2048 nucleons ( 1372 nucleons in some cases ) contained in a cubic box which is imposed by the periodic boundary condition . throughout this paper , the numbers of the protons ( neutrons ) with up - spin and with down - spin are equal . the relativistic degenerate electrons which ensure the charge neutrality are regarded as a uniform background and the coulomb interaction is calculated by the ewald method taking account of the gaussian charge distribution of each wave - packet ( see appendix [ ewald sum ] ) . this method enables us to efficiently sum up contributions of long - range interactions in a system with periodic boundary conditions . for nuclear interaction , we use the effective hamiltonian developed by maruyama et al . ( medium eos model ) @xcite whose expressions are given in the last section . we first prepare an uniform hot nucleon gas at @xmath68 mev as an initial condition equilibrated for @xmath69 fm/@xmath70 in advance . in order to realize the ground state of matter , we then cool it down slowly for @xmath71 fm/@xmath70 , keeping the nucleon density constant with the frictional relaxation method [ eqs . ( [ qmdeom fric ] ) ] , etc . @xcite until the temperature gets @xmath72 mev or less . note that no artificial fluctuations are given in the simulation . the qmd equations of motion with the friction terms given by eqs . ( [ qmdeom fric ] ) are solved using the fourth - order gear predictor - corrector method in conjunction with multiple time step algorithm @xcite . integration time steps @xmath73 are set to be adaptive in the range of @xmath74 fm/@xmath70 depending on the degree of convergence . at each step , the correcting operation is iterated until the error of position @xmath75 and the relative error of momentum @xmath76 become smaller than @xmath77 , where @xmath75 and @xmath76 are estimated as the maximum values of correction among all particles . we mainly use pcs(pentium iii ) equipped with mdgrape-2 , which accelerates calculations of momentum - independent forces including the long - range coulomb force . shown in figs . [ fig pasta sym ] and [ fig pasta x0.3 ] are the resultant nucleon distributions of cold matter at @xmath78 0.5 and 0.3 , respectively . we can see from these figures that the phases with rodlike and slablike nuclei , cylindrical and spherical bubbles , in addition to the phase with spherical nuclei are reproduced in both the cases of @xmath78 0.5 and 0.3 . we here would like to mention the reasons of discrepancies between the present result and the result obtained by maruyama et al . which says `` the nuclear shape may not have these simple symmetries '' @xcite . one of the most crucial reasons seems to be the difference in treatment of the coulomb interaction . in the present simulation , we calculate the long range coulomb interaction in a consistent way using the ewald method . for the system of interest where the thomas - fermi screening length is comparable to or larger than the size of nuclei , this treatment is more adequate than that which inctroduces an artificial cutoff distance as in ref . the other crucial reason is the difference in the relaxation time scales @xmath79 fm/@xmath70 ; we set @xmath80 in the present work , but maruyama et al . set @xmath81 several@xmath82 fm/@xmath70 @xcite . in our simulation , we can reproduce the bubble - phases [ see ( d ) and ( e ) of figs . [ fig pasta sym ] and [ fig pasta x0.3 ] ] with @xmath83 fm/@xmath70 and the nucleus - phases [ see ( b ) and ( c ) of figs . [ fig pasta sym ] and [ fig pasta x0.3 ] ] with @xmath84 fm/@xmath70 . however , the matter in the density region corresponding to a nucleus - phase is quenched in an amorphous - like state when @xmath85 fm/@xmath70 . in the present work , we take @xmath79 much larger than typical time scale @xmath86 fm/@xmath70 for nucleons to thermally diffuse in the distance of @xmath9 fm at @xmath87 and @xmath88 mev . this temperature is lower than the typical value of the liquid - gas phase transition temperature in the density region of interest , it is thus considered that our results are thermally relaxed in a satisfying level . phase diagrams of matter in the ground state are shown in figs . [ phase diagram 1](a ) and ( b ) for @xmath78 0.5 and 0.3 , respectively . as can be seen from these figures , the obtained phase diagrams basically reproduce the sequence of the energetically favored nuclear shapes predicted by simple discussions @xcite which only take account of the coulomb and surface effects ; this prediction is that the nuclear shape changes like sphere @xmath4 cylinder @xmath4 slab @xmath4 cylindrical hole @xmath4 spherical hole @xmath4 uniform , with increasing density . comparing figs . 3 ( a ) and ( b ) , we can see that the phase diagram shifts towards the lower density side with decreasing @xmath89 , which is due to the tendency that the saturation density is lowered as the neutron excess increases . it is remarkable that the density dependence of the nuclear shape , except for spherical nuclei and bubbles , is quite sensitive and phases with intermediate nuclear shapes which are not simple as shown in figs . 1 and 2 are observed in two density regions : one is between the cylinder phase and the slab phase , the other is between the slab phase and the cylindrical hole phase . we note that these phases are different from coexistence phases with nuclei of simple shapes , which will be referred to as `` intermediate phases '' . we have also performed qmd simulations of matter with proton fraction @xmath7 as a more realistic condition for the neutron star matter . in this case , we have to deal with a larger system than in the cases of @xmath0 and 0.3 because enough number of protons for reproducing several nuclei in a simulation box are required to obtain significant results ; protons play an important role in generating the long - range order due to their electric charge . we have investigated the neutron - rich matter at @xmath7 with 10976 nucleons , in which 1098 protons and 9878 neutrons are contained . following basically the same procedure that used for the cases of @xmath0 and 0.3 ( see section [ sim p - rich ] for detail ) , we tried to obtain the ground - state matter . however , in the present case , we quickly relax from the initial state at @xmath90 mev to the state at @xmath91 mev , at which matter is still uniform , with a nos - hoover - like thermostat @xcite which will be discussed in another paper @xcite . after the relaxation at @xmath91 mev for @xmath92 7000 fm/@xmath70 , we then cool down the system with a relaxation time scale @xmath84 fm/@xmath70 using the qmd equations of motion with friction terms ( [ qmdeom fric ] ) . these simulations are performed by fujitsu vpp 5000 equipped with mdgrape-2 . some resultant nucleon distributions are shown in figs . [ fig sphere x0.1 ] and [ fig cylinder x0.1 ] , which correspond to the sphere phase and the cylinder phase , respectively . as can be seen in fig . [ fig sphere x0.1 ] , dripped neutrons spread over the whole region in the simulation box , which lead to smaller density contrast compared with that for the cases of @xmath0 and 0.3 depicted in figs . [ fig pasta sym ] and [ fig pasta x0.3 ] , respectively . the results obtained for @xmath7 are summarized in the phase diagram shown in fig . [ phase diagram 2 ] . a striking feature is that the wide density region from @xmath93 to @xmath94 is occupied by an intermediate phase . the structure of matter seems to change rather continuously from that consists of branching rodlike nuclei connected to each other [ obtained in the lower density region of the intermediate phase denoted by ( c , u ) ] to that consists of branching bubbles connected to each other [ higher density region of the intermediate phase ( c , u ) ] . however , in the present neutron - rich case , `` pasta '' phase with slablike nuclei can not be obtained as far as we have investigated , which will be discussed at the end of the next section . it is also noted that the density at which matter turns into uniform is lower than those in the cases of @xmath0 and 0.3 , which is consistent with the tendency that matter becomes the more neutron - rich , the saturation density becomes the lower . to analyze the spatial distribution of nucleons , we calculate two - point correlation function @xmath95 for nucleon density field @xmath96 @xmath97 where @xmath11 stands for nucleons@xmath98 . @xmath95 is here defined as @xmath99 where @xmath100 denotes an average over the position @xmath101 and the direction of @xmath102 , and @xmath103 is the fluctuation of the density field @xmath104 given by @xmath105 with @xmath106 we construct the nucleon density distribution @xmath104 from a data set of the centers of position of the nucleons by the following procedure . we first set @xmath107 ( for @xmath0 and 0.3 ) or @xmath108 ( for @xmath7 ) grid points in the simulation box and then distribute particle numbers on each grid point using the cloud - in - cell method ( see , e.g. , ref . next , we carry out the smoothing procedure in the discrete fourier space with a gaussian smoothing function corresponding to the distribution of the wave packet given by eq . ( [ packet ] ) . the density distributions @xmath109 , where @xmath110 or 1 projects on particle type @xmath22 , in the discrete real space can be obtained by the inverse fourier transformation . the fourier transformations are performed using the fft algorithm . the resultant two - point correlation functions @xmath111 , @xmath112 and @xmath113 at various densities below @xmath114 at which matter becomes uniform at zero temperature for @xmath0 , 0.3 and 0.1 are plotted in figs . [ corr x0.5 ] , [ corr x0.3 ] and [ corr x0.1 ] , respectively . we can see the general tendency , which is common for the different values of @xmath89 , that the amplitude of @xmath115 decreases with increasing the density . it is noted that even though the change in the amplitude of @xmath115 is quite noticeable , the smallest zero - point @xmath116 of @xmath115 takes similar values at various densities especially for @xmath0 and 0.3 . this feature means that the typical length scales of the nuclear structures , i.e. , the internuclear distance and the nuclear radius , keep comparable at subnuclear densities from @xmath117 to @xmath114 , which is consistent with the results obtained by the previous works ( see , e.g. , refs . this behavior just below @xmath114 will be discussed further concerning a problem about the properties of the transition to uniform matter . we also note that a strong attractive force acting between a proton and a neutron leads to the good agreement of the zero - points of @xmath118 and @xmath119 even for @xmath6 and 0.1 as well as for @xmath0 although the zero - point @xmath120 of @xmath119 is @xmath121 fm ( @xmath122 fm ) larger than that of @xmath118 for @xmath6 ( 0.1 ) at each density . this shows that the phase of the density fluctuations of protons and neutrons correlate so strongly with each other at zero temperature that they almost coincide . as can be seen by comparing @xmath111 for different values of the proton fraction @xmath89 , the amplitude decreases and the value of the smallest zero - point @xmath120 increases with decreasing @xmath89 . this behavior means that , as matter becomes more neutron - rich , not only the nucleon density distribution gets smoother but also the spatial structure becomes larger . let us then examine @xmath95 for each value of the proton fraction . for symmetric matter ( @xmath0 ) , protons and neutrons are equivalent except for the mass difference and the coulomb interaction . therefore , the two - point correlation functions @xmath123 , @xmath118 and @xmath119 are almost the same at larger values of @xmath124 . at smaller values of @xmath125 , @xmath118 is slightly smaller than @xmath119 because the repulsive coulomb interaction among protons tends to reduce the proton density inhomogeneity especially in the smaller scale . for asymmetric matter ( @xmath6 and 0.1 ) , on the contrary , the amplitude of @xmath119 is much smaller than that of @xmath118 due to the dripped neutrons which distribute rather uniformly outside the nuclei . let us here examine the properties of the transition from the phase with spherical bubbles to uniform matter for @xmath0 . for this purpose , two - point correlation function of the nucleon density fluctuation is useful . in fig . [ corr2 melt ] , we thus plot the two - point correlation function of the nucleon density fluctuation @xmath111 for several densities around the melting density @xmath114 . to compute @xmath111 , we use a 1372-nucleon system cooled down until the temperature gets @xmath126 0.05 mev by qmd equations of motion ( [ qmdeom fric ] ) with friction terms . for uniform phase , @xmath111 should be zero except for the contribution of short - range correlation . the behavior of @xmath111 shows that @xmath114 lies between 0.7@xmath127 and @xmath128 at @xmath0 [ see also fig . [ phase diagram 1](a ) ] above which long - range correlation disappears . it is noted that the smallest value of @xmath116 at which @xmath129 keeps around 8 fm even at densities just below @xmath114 . this means that , for @xmath0 , the phase with spherical bubbles whose radii are around @xmath120 suddenly disappear rather than they shrink gradually and the system turns into uniform with increasing the density because the quantity @xmath120 nearly corresponds to the half wave - length of the inhomogeneous density profile . the discontinuous change in the density profile indicates that the transition between the phase with spherical bubbles and the uniform phase is of first order . this conclusion is also obtained in the previous calculations for which the spatial structure of the nuclear matter region and/or the shape of the density profile are assumed @xcite . in the present work , we have confirmed the first order nature by qmd simulations without these assumptions as several authors have done so without the assumptions by the thomas - fermi approximation @xcite . for the cases of @xmath6 and 0.1 , we could not see the significant sign of the first order nature of the transition between the mixed phase and the uniform phase because the amplitude of @xmath111 is quite small just below @xmath114 . further study is necessary to determine the properties of the transition for theses cases of asymmetric matter . to extract the morphological characteristics of the nuclear shape changes and the intermediate phases , we introduce the minkowski functionals ( see , e.g. , ref . @xcite and references therein ; a concise review is provided by ref . @xcite ) as geometrical and topological measures of the nuclear surface . let us consider a homogeneous body @xmath130 in the @xmath131-dimensional eucledian space , where @xmath132 is the class of such bodies . morphological measures are defined as functionals @xmath133 which satisfy the following three general properties : * _ motion invariance _ : the functional is independent of the position and the direction of the body , i.e. , @xmath134 where @xmath135 denotes any translations and rotations . * _ additivity _ : the functional of the union of two bodies should behave like a volume . the contribution of the overlapping region should be subtracted , i.e. , @xmath136 where @xmath137 . * _ continuity _ : if the body is approximated with pixels , the functional of the approximate body converges to that of the original body when the pixels get smaller , i.e. , @xmath138 where @xmath57 is a convex body and @xmath139 is a sequence of convex bodies . hadwiger s theorem in integral geometry states that there are just @xmath140 independent functionals which satisfy the above properties ; they are known as minkowski functionals . in three dimensional space , four minkowski functionals are related to the volume , the surface area , the integral mean curvature and the euler characteristic . in classifying nuclear shapes including those of the intermediate phases obtained in our simulations , the integral mean curvature and the euler characteristic are useful , which will be discussed later . both are described by surface integrals of the following local quantities : the mean curvature @xmath141 and the gaussian curvature @xmath142 , i.e. , @xmath143 and @xmath144 , where @xmath145 and @xmath146 are the principal curvatures and @xmath147 is the area element of the surface of the body @xmath57 . the euler characteristic @xmath148 is a purely topological quantity and is given by @xmath149 thus @xmath150 for the sphere and the spherical hole phases and the coexistence phase of spheres and cylinders , and @xmath151 for the other ideal `` pasta '' phases , i.e. the cylinder , the slab and the cylindrical hole phases which consist of infinitely long rods , infinitely extending slabs and infinitely long cylindrical holes , respectively . we introduce the area - averaged mean curvature , @xmath152 , and the euler characteristic density , @xmath153 , as normalized quantities , where @xmath154 is the volume of the whole space . we calculate the normalized minkowski functionals , i.e. , the volume fraction @xmath155 , the surface area density @xmath156 , the area - averaged mean curvature @xmath157 and the euler characteristic density @xmath158 for @xmath0 and 0.3 by the following procedure . as described in subsection [ 2pcf ] , we first construct proton and nucleon density distributions @xmath159 and @xmath160 , where @xmath161 or 1 is the isospin projection on the proton state . we set a threshold proton density @xmath162 and then calculate @xmath163 , where @xmath164 and @xmath165 are the volume and the surface area of the regions in which @xmath166 . we find out the value @xmath167 where @xmath168 and define the regions in which @xmath169 as nuclear regions . for spherical nuclei , for example , @xmath170 corresponds to a point of inflection of a radial density distribution . in the most phase - separating region , the values of @xmath171 distribute in the range of about @xmath172 @xmath173 in the both cases of @xmath174 and 0.3 , where @xmath171 is the threshold nucleon density corresponds to @xmath170 . we then calculate @xmath155 , @xmath175 , @xmath176 and @xmath148 for the identified nuclear surface . we evaluate @xmath155 by counting the number of pixels at which @xmath177 is higher than @xmath170 , @xmath175 by the triangle decomposition method , @xmath176 by the algorithm shown in ref . @xcite in conjunction with a calibration by correction of surface area , and @xmath148 by the algorithm of ref . @xcite and by that of counting deficit angles @xcite , which are confirmed that both of them give the same results . we have plotted the resultant @xmath66 dependence of @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 and @xmath153 for the isodensity surface of @xmath178 in figs . [ fig minko 1 ] and [ fig minko 2 ] . in addition to the values of @xmath155 , @xmath156 and @xmath157 for the isodensity surface of @xmath178 , we have also investigated those for the isodensity surfaces of @xmath179 to examine the extent of the uncertainties of these quantities which stem from the arbitrariness in the definition of the nuclear surface . as shown in fig . [ fig minko 1 ] , these uncertainties are at most @xmath180 for @xmath155 and @xmath181 @xmath182 for @xmath156 . for @xmath157 , we could not observe remarkable differences from the values for @xmath178 ( they were smaller than 0.015 @xmath182 ) . we could not see these kinds of uncertainties in @xmath153 , except for the densities near below @xmath114 . as shown in fig . [ fig minko 1 ] , the volume fraction @xmath155 of the nuclear regions increases almost monotonically under @xmath114 in both cases of @xmath0 and 0.3 . this feature reflects the incompressible nature of nuclear matter . it is interesting to see the density dependence of the nuclear surface density @xmath156 because this quantity is directly related to the surface energy density , which is one of the key factors in determining the nuclear shape . figs . [ fig minko 1](c ) and [ fig minko 1](d ) show that , as the nucleon density increases , @xmath156 increases at a nearly constant rate until @xmath183 , and then its increasing rate becomes rather smaller around the density region of the slab phase , and finally it begins to decrease in the density region of the cylindrical hole phase or the spherical hole phase . this general behavior can be understood from the density dependence of the surface energy density obtained by simple arguments , which only allow for the nuclear surface and the coulomb effects ( see , e.g. , refs . @xcite ) . we also plot @xmath155 and @xmath156 for the nucleon density distribution @xmath184 as functions of the threshold density @xmath185 evaluated at various values of @xmath66 . the results for @xmath0 and 0.3 are shown in figs . [ fig minko thres x0.5 ] and [ fig minko thres x0.3 ] , respectively . features of nuclear shape changes can be seen in the behavior of the curves of @xmath156 . peaks in the higher @xmath185 region are attributed to nucleons in the nuclear matter regions and broad bumps in the lower @xmath185 region around 0.05 0.1@xmath127 observed for @xmath6 are due to the dripped neutrons outside nuclei . @xmath156 in the intermediate @xmath185 region in which its slope is nearly constant mainly comes from contribution of nuclear surfaces . as the nucleon density @xmath66 increases , the higher @xmath185 peak becomes more clear and the position of the center of the peak finally coincides with @xmath66 in the uniform phase . this feature shows that the nuclear matter regions become more uniform with increasing the density . when the dispersion of the internucleon distance is small , large surface area caused by the gaussian density distribution of each nucleon can be picked up with a single value of @xmath185 . as can be seen in fig . [ fig minko thres x0.3 ] , the lower @xmath185 bump , in turn , disappears with increasing @xmath66 . this is because , as @xmath66 increases , the dripped neutron gas becomes more inhomogeneous and tends to distribute close to the nuclear surface leading to a lower proton fraction in the nuclear matter regions . it is also noted that , as the nucleon density increases , the slope in the intermediate @xmath185 region changes from negative to positive at the density corresponding to the phase of slablike nuclei ( 0.4@xmath127 for @xmath0 and 0.35@xmath127 for @xmath6 ) , which is consistent with what is expected from the sign of @xmath157 for the nuclear surface [ see figs . [ fig minko 2](a ) and [ fig minko 2](b ) ] . let us then focus on @xmath157 and @xmath158 to classify the nuclear shape . the behavior of @xmath157 shows that it decreases almost monotonically from positive to negative with increasing @xmath66 until the matter turns into uniform . the densities corresponding to @xmath186 are about 0.4 and 0.35@xmath127 for @xmath0 and 0.3 , respectively ; these values are consistent with the density regions of the phase with slablike nuclei ( see fig . [ phase diagram 1 ] ) . as mentioned previously , @xmath153 is actually positive in the density regions corresponding to the phases with spherical nuclei , coexistence of spherical and cylindrical nuclei , and spherical holes because of the existence of isolated regions . as for those corresponding to the phases with cylindrical nuclei , planar nuclei and cylindrical holes , @xmath187 . the fact that the values of @xmath153 are not exactly zero for nucleon distributions shown as the slab phase in figs . [ fig pasta sym ] and [ fig pasta x0.3 ] reflects the imperfection of these `` slabs '' , which is due to the small nuclear parts connecting the neighboring slabs . however , we can say that the behaviors of @xmath153 plotted in figs . [ fig minko 2](c ) and [ fig minko 2](d ) show that @xmath153 is negative in the density region of the intermediate phases , even if we take into account the imperfection of the obtained nuclear shapes and the uncertainties of the definition of the nuclear surface . this means that the intermediate phases consist of nuclear surfaces which are saddle - like at each point on average and they consist of each highly connected nuclear and gas regions due to a lot of tunnels [ see eq . ( [ euler ] ) ] . using the quantities @xmath157 and @xmath158 , the sequence of the nuclear shapes with increasing the density can be described as follows : @xmath188 @xmath4 @xmath189 @xmath4 @xmath190 @xmath4 @xmath191 @xmath4 @xmath192 @xmath4 @xmath193 @xmath4 @xmath194 @xmath4 uniform . let us now consider the discrepancy from the results of previous works which do not assume nuclear structure @xcite ; the intermediate phases can not be seen in these works . we can give following two reasons for the discrepancy . * these previous calculations are based on the thomas - fermi approximation which can not sufficiently incorporate fluctuations of nucleon distributions . this shortcoming may result in favoring nuclei of smoothed simple shapes than in the real situation . * there is a strong possibility that some highly connected structures which have two or more substructures in a period are neglected in these works because only one structure is contained in a simulation box . it is not unnatural that the phases with highly connected nuclear and bubble regions are realized as the most energetically stable state @xcite . it is considered that , for example , a phase with perforated slablike nuclei , which has negative @xmath153 , could be more energetically stable than that with extremely thin slablike nuclei . the thin planar nucleus costs surface - surface energy which stems from the fact that nucleons bound in the nucleus feel its surfaces of both sides . the surface - surface energy brings about an extra energy increase in addition to the contribution of the surface energy . we have to examine the existence of the intermediate phases by more extensive simulations with larger nucleon numbers and with longer relaxation time scales in the future . in the case of @xmath7 , the criterion for identification of the isodensity surface corresponding to the nuclear surface using the second derivative of @xmath195 does not work at higher densities . we thus use another method to calculate the normalized minkowski functionals of the nuclear surface for @xmath7 . in fig . [ fig euler typical ] , we have plotted the @xmath185 dependence of the euler characteristic density @xmath158 at @xmath196 as an example . we can see that this curve consists of three components : the peaks of the lower @xmath185 region , the plateau region and the peaks of the higher @xmath185 region , which are due to dripped neutrons ( thus these peaks can not be observed for @xmath0 ) , nuclear surfaces and nucleons in nuclei , respectively . these components can also be seen at the other values of @xmath66 lower than @xmath114 . however , we have to mention that the higher the density becomes , the smaller the plateau region gets , which means that the density contrast between the dripped neutron gas region and the nuclear matter region becomes obscure . here , we take the mean values of the normalized minkowski functionals in the plateau region as those for the nuclear surface , which are plotted as crosses in fig . [ fig minko x0.1 ] . the error bars shown in this figure are the standard deviations of these quantities in the plateau region . consistency between this method and the one using the second derivative of @xmath195 has been confirmed for @xmath6 . [ fig minko x0.1 ] shows the resultant normalized minkowski functionals for the nuclear surface at various values of @xmath66 below @xmath114 . the qualitative behaviors of @xmath155 and @xmath157 for @xmath7 are the same as those for @xmath0 and 0.3 ; as @xmath66 increases , @xmath155 increases and @xmath157 decreases ( from positive to negative ) almost monotonically in the density region of 0.1@xmath197 . however , in the behaviors of @xmath156 and @xmath158 , qualitative differences can be observed between the present case and the cases of @xmath0 and 0.3 . as can be seen in fig . [ fig minko x0.1](b ) , @xmath156 increases almost linearly until just below @xmath114 . the absence of the phases with cylindrical bubbles and with spherical bubbles in the phase diagram of @xmath7 ( fig . [ phase diagram 2 ] ) is well characterized by the behavior of @xmath158 shown in fig . [ fig minko x0.1](d ) . in the cases of @xmath0 and 0.3 , @xmath158 increases from negative to positive with increasing density in the density region higher than that of the slab phase . however , for @xmath7 , we can not observe the tendency that @xmath158 starts increasing even at just below @xmath114 . as a result , @xmath158 keeps negative until matter becomes uniform . ( further discussion will be given in section [ int ] . ) let us then consider the phase with slablike nuclei , which have not been obtained in the simulations for @xmath7 . if it were realized by using a longer relaxation time scale , it is expected to be obtained at @xmath198 0.34 @xmath127 according to the behaviors of the @xmath157 and @xmath158 . however , we can not see any signs from fig . [ fig minko x0.1](b ) that @xmath156 stops increasing in this density region unlike the behaviors of @xmath156 in the cases of @xmath0 and 0.3 . here , we would like to mention that , according to the landau - peierls argument , thermal fluctuations are effective at destroying the long - range order of one - dimensional layered lattice of slablike nuclei rather than that of triangular lattice of rodlike nuclei and of bcc lattice of spherical ones . thus , the melting temperature of the planar phase would be lower than the other phases , which leads to a longer time scale for formation of the slablike nuclei by the thermal diffusion . therefore , a further investigation with a longer relaxation time scale is necessary to determine whether or not the phase with slablilke nuclei is really prohibited in such neutron - rich matter in the present model . in fig . [ fig minko thres x0.1 ] , we have also plotted @xmath155 and @xmath156 for the density distribution @xmath184 as functions of @xmath185 like figs . [ fig minko thres x0.5 ] and [ fig minko thres x0.3 ] . in comparison with fig . [ fig minko thres x0.3 ] , the contribution of the dripped neutrons is shown more clearly in this case . we can see that the peak in the lower @xmath185 region due to the dripped neutrons combines to the peak in the higher @xmath185 region . this behavior stems from the fact that a part of the dripped neutrons at lower densities are absorbed into nuclear matter region with increasing the density at fixed @xmath89 ; finally , all the neutrons are contained there in the uniform phase . we can also expect from the @xmath185 dependence of @xmath156 that the phase with slablike nuclei might be obtained around @xmath199 , where the slope of the plateau region is close to zero . let us here examine the effective nuclear interaction used in this work . structure of matter at subnuclear densities is affected by the properties of neutron - rich nuclei and of the pure neutron gas resulted from the nuclear interaction . key quantities are the energy per nucleon @xmath1 of the pure neutron matter , the proton chemical potential @xmath2 in the pure neutron matter , and the nuclear surface tension @xmath3 . there is a tendency , especially in the case of neutron star matter , that the higher @xmath1 , the density @xmath114 at which matter becomes uniform is lowered . this is because larger @xmath1 tends to favor uniform nuclear matter without dripped neutron gas regions than mixed phases with dripped neutron gas regions . in the neutron star matter , there is also a tendency that the lower @xmath2 , the smaller @xmath114 . this is because @xmath200 represents the degree to which the neutron gas outside the nuclei favors the presence of protons in itself . the quantity @xmath3 controls the size of the nuclei and bubbles , and hence the sum of the coulomb and surface energies . with increasing @xmath3 and so this energy sum , @xmath114 gets lowered . it is important to check whether the effective nuclear force given by eqs . ( [ hamiltonian])([coulomb ] ) yields unrealistic values of these quantities or not . if @xmath1 , @xmath201 and @xmath3 for the present model are unrealistically small in comparison with those for the other models , our results which have reproduced the `` pasta '' phases might be quite limited for the present model hamiltonian . in order to evaluate @xmath1 , we set 1372 neutrons in a simulation box imposed of the periodic boundary condition . this system is cooled down by the qmd equations of motion with friction terms [ see eqs . ( [ qmdeom fric ] ) ] until the temperature becomes @xmath126 1 kev . the resultant values of @xmath1 are plotted in fig . [ fig e_n ] . we note that our results for @xmath2020.2 , 0.6 and 1.0 @xmath127 ( the result for @xmath203 is not plotted in fig . [ fig e_n ] ) coincide with the results for zero - proton ratio plotted in fig . 9 of ref . @xcite . the values of @xmath1 for the present model behave like those for the skm skyrme interaction especially in the density region of @xmath204 @xmath173 ; they are close to the result of the variational chain summation obtained by akmal , pandharipande and ravenhall @xcite at @xmath205 . the steep rise in @xmath1 in the higher neutron density region ( @xmath206 @xmath173 ) compared to those obtained from the hartree - fock theory using various skyrme interactions would help neutron - rich matter , which have larger dripped neutron density of @xmath206 @xmath173 , to be uniform . therefore , we can say that this behavior of @xmath1 for the present qmd model hamiltonian suppresses the density region in which the `` pasta '' phases are the most energetically favorable in neutron star matter and in the case of @xmath7 in the present study . we also note that @xmath1 at lower neutron densities of @xmath207 @xmath173 is relatively small . this , in turn , would lead to increase the density at which matter with lower dripped neutron density ( e.g. , the case of @xmath6 in the present study ) turns into uniform . next , we calculate the proton chemical potential @xmath2 in the pure neutron matter . we use the cold neutron matter prepared for the above calculation of @xmath1 as an initial condition . we insert a proton into this pure neutron matter , and then minimize the total energy by the frictional relaxation method with fixing the positions and momenta of the other neutrons . the position of the inserted proton is chosen randomly in the simulation box , and its momentum is chosen randomly from @xmath208 mev@xmath209 . we evaluate @xmath2 as the difference in the total energy between that before the insertion of the proton and that after the optimization of the position and the momentum of the proton . in fig . [ fig mu_p0 ] , we plot @xmath2 for the present model hamiltonian . as can be seen from this figure , the result for the present model hamiltonian generally reproduce the data of the other results obtained from the hartree - fock theory using the various skyrme interactions at densities @xmath210 @xmath173 . at lower densities of @xmath211 @xmath173 , errors are quite large and data scatter significantly . this is because density fluctuations in pure neutron matter obtained by qmd would be unrealistically large at such low densities due to the fixed width of the wave packets in this model . however , it is noted that even in such a density region , our data are generally consistent with the other results mentioned above . finally , we turn to the surface tension , which affects energetically favorable nuclear shape most directly among the three quantities discussed here . we have calculated @xmath3 from the energy change induced by the change in the area of planar nuclear matter . we use nucleon gas with proton fractions @xmath7 , 0.2 , 0.3 and 0.5 composed of 1372 nucleons . in the calculation of @xmath3 , the coulomb interaction is excluded . in order to prepare slablike nuclear matter , we first cool down the above nucleon gas from @xmath90 mev to @xmath212 mev using eqs . ( [ qmdeom fric ] ) in a shallow trapping harmonic potential @xmath213 where @xmath214 mev @xmath215 . the simulation box here is imposed of the periodic boundary condition in the @xmath89- and @xmath216-directions , and is imposed of the open boundary condition in the @xmath217-direction . the box size @xmath218 in the @xmath89- and @xmath216-directions is set 20.26 fm . when the temperature reaches @xmath212 mev , we remove the trapping potential and , except for the case with @xmath0 , we change the boundary condition in the @xmath217-direction from open to periodic . the box size in the @xmath217-direction @xmath219 is chosen so as to at least all nucleons dripped outside the nuclear matter region can be contained in the box : @xmath220 fm ( @xmath7 ) , 79.12 fm ( @xmath221 ) , and 82.85 fm ( @xmath6 ) . after we relax the system for @xmath126 7000 fm/@xmath70 , we prepare three kinds of samples : one is nothing changed ( sample 1 ) and the others have the area of the @xmath222 side of the simulation box increased ( decreased ) by 1 @xmath223 with the total volume of the box kept constant [ sample 2 ( sample 3 ) ] . we further cool them down until @xmath224 kev . the resultant nucleon density profiles for the sample 1 of @xmath7 projected on the @xmath217-axis is shown in fig . [ fig profile ] . as can be seen from this figure , @xmath225 fm is much larger than the thickness of the slab @xmath226 fm , and thus the volume of the dripped neutron gas region is almost the same among the three kinds of samples because the volume change in the nuclear matter region is negligible . it is also noted that @xmath131 is much larger than the surface thickness @xmath227 fm , which ensures that the surfaces at both sides of the slab are separated well . therefore , we can say that the energy difference between the sample 2 and 3 is just due to the difference in the surface area of the planar nuclear matter . following the spirit of ravenhall , bennett and pethick ( hereafter rbp ) @xcite and by using the sample 1 , we define the proton fraction @xmath228 in the nuclear matter region as an averaged value for the region of the width of @xmath229 fm in the central part of the slab , where the proton and neutron density profiles ripple around constant values . we extract @xmath3 from the total energy @xmath230 of the sample 2 and @xmath231 of the sample 3 as follows : @xmath232 where @xmath233 is the area of the @xmath222 side of the sample 2 ( sample 3 ) given by @xmath234 @xmath235 ( @xmath236 @xmath235 ) . the factor 2 in the denominator represents , of course , the contribution of the two sides of the planar nuclear matter . as shown in fig . [ fig esurf ] , all the results plotted in this figure almost coincide with each other at @xmath237 , where uncertainty in the nuclear surface tension is rather small . these results deviate significantly at lower @xmath228 , and the values of @xmath3 of the present calculation lie between those obtained by baym , bethe and pethick ( hereafter bbp ) @xcite and by rbp @xcite , which is based on the hartree - fock calculation using a skyrme interaction , at @xmath238 . thus we can say that , in comparison with the result by rbp taken to be standard here , the contribution of @xmath3 of the present qmd model tends to favor uniform nuclear matter rather than the inhomogeneous `` pasta '' phases for lower @xmath228 of @xmath239 . now let us discuss the fact that the intermediate phases with a negative value of @xmath158 are obtained instead of the bubble phases in a wide density region for @xmath7 . in considering this problem , we should note the general tendency that @xmath201 increases and @xmath3 decreases as matter becomes neutron - rich ( see figs . [ fig mu_p0 ] and [ fig esurf ] ) . the density dependence of @xmath156 monotonically increases until @xmath114 as shown in fig . [ fig minko x0.1 ] would partly stem from the small value of @xmath3 . the apparently lower melting density @xmath114 in this case than in the cases of @xmath0 and 0.3 , even though @xmath3 is small , is due to a large @xmath201 , which increases typically of order 10 mev as @xmath240 increases . the small @xmath3 and the large @xmath201 in neutron - rich matter would help nuclear matter regions and neutron gas regions mix each other at the cost of small surface energy below @xmath114 . as a result , the structures with a negative @xmath158 could be favored . according to fig . [ fig mu_p0 ] , the quantity @xmath2 obtained for the present model hamiltonian is consistent with those for the other skyrme - hartree - fock calculations in the relevant region of @xmath241 @xmath173 . it is thus possible that a result which shows the structure of matter changes from negative @xmath158 to uniform without undergoing `` swiss cheese '' structure will be obtained by another calculation for neutron - rich matter using some framework without assuming nuclear shape . in closing this subsection , we summarize the consequences of the resultant @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 for the present qmd hamiltonian . * for symmetric matter ( @xmath242 ) + according to @xmath3 at @xmath237 , the present model is consistent with the other results , and is an appropriate effective interaction for the study of the `` pasta '' phases at @xmath0 . * for neutron - rich cases + for neutron - rich cases such as @xmath243 , in which the dripped neutron density @xmath240 grows @xmath244 @xmath173 just before matter turns into uniform , the present qmd model can be taken as a conservative one in reproducing the `` pasta '' phases . its @xmath1 , @xmath2 and @xmath3 act to suppress the density region of the `` pasta '' phases compared to other skyrme - hartree - fock results . * for intermediate cases + at intermediate proton fraction of @xmath245 , @xmath1 of the present model acts to favor the inhomogeneous `` pasta''phases rather than the uniform phase and @xmath3 acts in the opposite way in comparison with other skyrme - hartree - fock results . here we would like to discuss astrophysical consequences of our results . pethick and potekhin have pointed out that elastic properties of `` pasta '' phases with rodlike and slablike nuclei are similar to those of liquid crystals , which stems from the similarity in the geometrical structures @xcite . it can also be said that the intermediate phases observed in the present work are `` spongelike '' ( or `` rubberlike '' for @xmath246 ) phases because they have both highly connected nuclear and bubble regions shown as @xmath247 . the elastic properties of the spongelike intermediate phases are qualitatively different from those of the liquid - crystal - like `` pasta '' phases because the former ones do not have any directions in which the restoring force does not act ; while the latter ones have . our results imply that the intermediate phases occupy a significant fraction of the density region in which nonspherical nuclei can be seen ( see figs . [ phase diagram 1 ] and [ phase diagram 2 ] ) . according to figs . [ phase diagram 1 ] and [ phase diagram 2 ] , we expect that the maximum elastic energy that can be stored in the neutron star crust and supernova inner core is higher than that in the case where all nonspherical nuclei have simple `` pasta '' structures . besides , the cylinder and the slab phases , which are liquid - crystal - like , lie between the spongelike intermediate phases or the crystalline solidlike phase , and the releasing of the strain energy would , in consequence , concentrate in the domain of these liquid - crystal - like phases . the above effects of the intermediate phases should be taken into account in considering the crust dynamics of starquakes and hydrodynamics of the core collapse , etc . if these phases exist in neutron star matter and supernova matter . in the context of pulsar glitch phenomena , the effects of the spongelike nuclei on the pinning rate and the creep velocity of superfluid neutron vortices also have yet to be investigated . for neutrino cooling of neutron stars , some version of the direct urca process which is suggested by lorenz et al . @xcite , that this might be allowed in the `` pasta '' phases , would be suppressed in the intermediate phases . this is due to the fact that the proton spectrum at the fermi surface is no longer continuous in the spongelike nuclei . an important topic which we would like to mention is about the effects of the intermediate phases on neutrino trapping in supernova cores . the nuclear parts connect over a wide region which is much larger than that characterized by the typical neutrino wave length @xmath248 fm . thus the neutrino scattering processes are no longer coherent in contrast to the case of the spherical nuclei , and this may , in consequence , reduce the diffusion time scale of neutrinos as in the case of `` pasta '' phases with simple structures . this reduction softens the supernova matter and would thus act to enhance the amount of the released gravitational energy . it would be interesting to estimate the neutrino opacity of the spongelike phases and the `` pasta '' phases . finally , we would like to mention the thermal fluctuations with long wavelengths leading to displacements of `` pasta '' nuclei , which can not be incorporated into the simulations using a finite - size box . even if we succeed in reproducing the phase with slablike nuclei in neutron - rich matter in the future study , we should remind the above effect of thermal fluctuations to consider the real situation of matter in inner crusts of neutron stars . following the discussions in refs . @xcite by a liquid - drop model , it is likely that the extension of slablike nuclei is limited to a finite length scale of @xmath249 fm in the temperature regions typical for neutron star crusts and supernova cores . we have performed qmd simulations for matter with fixed proton fractions @xmath0 , 0.3 and 0.1 at various densities below the normal nuclear density . our calculations without any assumptions on the nuclear shape demonstrate that the `` pasta '' phases with rodlike nuclei , with slablike nuclei , with cylindrical bubbles and with spherical bubbles can be formed dynamically from hot uniform matter within the time scale of @xmath80 fm/@xmath70 in the proton - rich cases of @xmath0 and 0.3 . we also demonstrate that the `` pasta '' phase with cylindrical nuclei can be formed dynamically within the time scale of @xmath84 fm/@xmath70 for the neutron - rich case of @xmath7 . our results imply the existence of at least the phase with cylindrical nuclei in neutron star crusts because they cool down keeping the local thermal equilibrium after proto - neutron stars are formed and their cooling time scale , which is macroscopic one , is much larger than the relaxation time scale of our simulations . in addition to these `` pasta '' phases with simple structures , our results obtained here also suggest the existence of intermediate phases which have complicated nuclear shapes . we have systematically analyzed the structure of matter with two - point correlation functions and with morphological measures `` minkowski functionals '' , and have demonstrated how structure changes with increasing density . making use of a topological quantity called euler characteristic , which is one of the minkowski functionals , it has been found that the intermediate phases can be characterized as those with negative euler characteristic . this means that the intermediate phases have `` spongelike '' ( or `` rubberlike '' for @xmath246 ) structures which have both highly connected nuclear and bubble regions . the elastic properties of the spongelike intermediate phases are qualitatively different from those of the liquid - crystal - like `` pasta '' phases . we have also investigated the properties of the effective qmd interaction used in the present work in order to examine the validity of our results . important quantities which affect the structure of matter are the energy per nucleon @xmath1 of the pure neutron matter , the proton chemical potential @xmath2 in pure neutron matter and the nuclear surface tension @xmath3 . the resultant these quantities show that the present qmd interaction has generally reasonable properties at subnuclear densities among other nuclear interactions . it is thus concluded that our results are not exceptional ones in terms of nuclear forces . our results which suggest the existence of the highly connected intermediate phases as well as the simple `` pasta '' phases provide a vivid picture that matter in neutron star inner crusts and supernova inner cores has a variety of material phases . the stellar region which we have tried to understand throughout this paper is relatively tiny , but there has quite rich properties which stem from the fancy structures of dense matter . g. w. is grateful to t. maruyama , k. iida , a. tohsaki , h. horiuchi , k. oyamatsu , h. takemoto , k. niita , s. chikazumi , i. kayo , c. hikage , t. buchert , n. itoh and k. kotake for helpful discussions and comments . g. w. also appreciate j. lee for checking the manuscript . this work was supported in part by the junior research associate program in riken through research grant no . j130026 and by grants - in - aid for scientific research provided by the ministry of education , culture , sports , science and technology through research grant ( s ) no . 14102004 , no . 14079202 and no . 14 - 7939 . in calculating a long - range interaction , such as the coulomb interaction , it is necessary to sum up all contributions of particles at a sufficiently far distance . the ewald sum is a familiar technique for efficiently computing the long - range contributions in a system with the periodic boundary condition ( see , e.g. , refs . @xcite ; recent mathematically careful discussion relating to the conditionally convergence of the coulomb energy can be seen , e.g. , in ref . the basic idea of the ewald sum is that the contributions of particles in a long distance in real space can be calculated as contributions in the neighborhood in fourier space : the contributions of particles in a short distance is summed up in real space and those of particles in a long distance is summed up in fourier space . let us consider a system consisting of charged particles which have a gaussian charge distribution and a uniform background charge which cancels the total charge of charged particles . these @xmath11 particles are assumed to be in a cubic simulation box with volume @xmath250 which is imposed by the periodic boundary condition . if every particle @xmath22 with total charge @xmath251 is surrounded by a gaussian charge distribution with total charge @xmath252 , the electrostatic interaction of particle @xmath22 turns into a screened short - range interaction . thus the total coulomb energy @xmath253 of this system can be decomposed into as follows ( see fig . [ fig ewald ] ) : @xmath254 where @xmath255 is the sum of the coulomb energy between an each unscreened charged particle @xmath22 and the other charged particles with screening charges , @xmath256 is that between an each unscreened charged particle @xmath22 and compensating charges which cancels the screening gaussian charges , and @xmath257 is the sum of spurious self interactions between an each charged particle @xmath22 and its compensating charge @xmath22 . charge densities of the real charged particles @xmath184 and of the screening charges @xmath258 can be written as @xmath259 where @xmath260 and @xmath261 are the reciprocals of the widths of charge distributions for a charged particle and a screening charge , respectively , and * n * denotes a position vector of a periodic image normalized by @xmath262 . thus a distribution of screened charges @xmath263 is @xmath264 the electrostatic potential @xmath265 due to @xmath266 can be obtained as because a solution of the poisson equation @xmath268\ ] ] is @xmath269 where erf(@xmath89 ) and erfc(@xmath89 ) are the error function and the complementary error function , respectively , and they are defined as @xmath270 and @xmath271 . here , we determine the constant @xmath272 so that the average value of @xmath273 in the simulation box @xmath154 be zero : @xmath274 thus , @xmath265 leads to next , we calculate @xmath256 , which is the sum of the coulomb energy between an unscreened charged particle @xmath22 and a charge density @xmath281 which consists of the compensating charges and the background charge : @xmath282 fourier transforming the charge distribution @xmath281 yields @xmath283 using @xmath284 and the poisson equation @xmath285 in the fourier form @xmath286 we can at once obtain the electrostatic potential @xmath287 due to the charge density @xmath288 : @xmath289 the term with @xmath290 is canceled due to charge neutrality . thus the coulomb energy @xmath256 is given by @xmath291 we have to subtract a sum of spurious self interactions @xmath292 between a charged particle @xmath22 and its compensating charge from @xmath256 . according to eq . ( [ solution ] ) , an electrostatic potential @xmath293 due to a gaussian compensating charge is @xmath294 , thus the self interaction of particle @xmath22 reads to @xmath295 and hence , @xmath296 finally , the total coulomb energy can be calculated by eqs . ( [ coul ] ) , ( [ u_short ] ) , ( [ u1 ] ) and ( [ u_self ] ) . the positive background charge does not appear explicitly because the average value of @xmath273 within the simulation box is set to be zero . the total coulomb energy per particle @xmath297 and the @xmath89 component of the coulomb force @xmath298 acting on a particle for various values of @xmath261 are plotted in fig . [ fig ewald ] . in this calculation , we use 1024 positive charged particles ( protons ) distributed randomly in a simulation box of @xmath299 fm ( i.e. @xmath300 ) , which is imposed of the periodic boundary condition . figs . [ fig ewald ] ( a ) and [ fig ewald ] ( b ) show the results for point charges and for gaussian charge distributions , respectively , which are calculated for the same configuration of the particle positions @xmath301 . the width of the gaussian charge distributions is set to be @xmath302 with @xmath303 @xmath235 , which corresponds to the width of the wave packets in the qmd model used in this work . we note that there are plateau regions of @xmath297 and @xmath298 whose values do not depend on @xmath261 . these constant values give results to be obtained . we note that the range of @xmath304 of the plateau regions become larger with increasing @xmath305 , where @xmath305 is the cutoff radius in the unit of @xmath306 for the summation in fourier space . as can be seen from fig . [ fig ewald ] , @xmath261 dependences of @xmath297 and @xmath298 for the present qmd model with a finite width of the gaussian charge distributions are weaker than those for the point charges . these features are also confirmed for different proton number densities of 0.2 and 0.3 @xmath127 . in our simulations , @xmath261 is set 13 or 14 , which are considered to be large enough to calculate the total coulomb energy per particle in accuracy less than @xmath307 kev , which is the typical value of the energy difference between successive `` pasta '' phases in neutron star matter obtained by previous works . bethe , g. borner and k. sato , astron . astrophys . * 7 * , 279 ( 1970 ) . g. baym , h. a. bethe and c. j. pethick , nucl . a175 * , 225 ( 1971 ) . k. sato , prog . * 54 * , 1325 ( 1975 ) . h. a. bethe , rev . phys . * 62 * , 801 ( 1990 ) . c. j. pethick and d. g. ravenhall , annu . nucl . part . * 45 * , 429 ( 1995 ) . d. g. ravenhall , c. j. pethick and j. r. wilson , phys . lett . * 50 * , 2066 ( 1983 ) . m. hashimoto , h. seki and m. yamada , prog . 71 * , 320 ( 1984 ) . lorenz , d.g . ravenhall and c.j . pethick , phys . lett . * 70 * , 379 ( 1993 ) . g. watanabe , k. iida and k. sato , nucl . * a676 * , 455 ( 2000 ) ; erratum , nucl . phys . a ( in press ) . g. watanabe , k. iida and k. sato , nucl . * a687 * , 512 ( 2001 ) ; erratum , nucl . a ( in press ) . r. d. williams and s. e. koonin , nucl . a435 * , 844 ( 1985 ) . m. lassaut , h. flocard , p. bonche , p.h . heenen and e. suraud , astron . astrophys . * 183 * , l3 ( 1987 ) . k. oyamatsu , nucl . phys . * a561 * , 431 ( 1993 ) . b. jones , mon . not . . soc . * 296 * , 217 ( 1998 ) ; mon . not . . soc . * 306 * , 327 ( 1998 ) ; phys . lett . * 83 * , 3589 ( 1999 ) . c. j. pethick and a.y . potekhin , phys . b427 * , 7 ( 1998 ) . c. j. horowitz , phys . d * 55 * ( 1997 ) 4577 . k. iida , g. watanabe and k. sato , prog . * 106 * , 551 ( 2001 ) . j. aichelin and h. stcker , phys . lett . * b176 * , 14 ( 1986 ) . h. feldmeier and j. schnack , rev . phys . * 72 * , 655 ( 2000 ) . g. watanabe , k. sato , k. yasuoka and t. ebisuzaki , phys . c * 66 * , 012801(r ) ( 2002 ) . h. feldmeier , nucl . phys . * a515 * , 147 ( 1990 ) . a. ono , h. horiuchi , t. maruyama and a. ohnishi , prog . theor . phys . * 87 * , 1185 ( 1992 ) ; phys . rev . lett . * 68 * , 2898 ( 1992 ) . t. maruyama , k. niita , k. oyamatsu , t. maruyama , s. chiba and a. iwamoto , phys . c * 57 * , 655 ( 1998 ) . in some cases , the nos - hoover - like thermostat which will be described in another paper @xcite is also used . in the present study , employment of this thermostat is almost limited in a higher temperature region where matter is completely uniform . g. watanabe , k. sato , k. yasuoka and t. ebisuzaki , in preparation . m. p. allen and d. j. tildesley , _ computer simulation of liquids _ ( clarendon , oxford , 1987 ) . t. maruyama , private communication . s. nos , j. chem . 81 * , 511 ( 1984 ) . w. g. hoover , phys . rev . a * 31 * , 1695 ( 1985 ) . r. w. hockney and j. w. eastwood , _ computer simulation using particles _ ( iop publishing , bristol , 1988 ) . r. ogasawara and k. sato , prog . * 68 * , 222 ( 1982 ) . k. michielsen and h. de raedt , phys . rep . * 347 * , 461 ( 2001 ) . j. schmalzing , s. engineer , t. buchert , v. sahni and s. shandarin , ( 1996 ) unpublished . j. r. gott iii , a. l. melott and m. dickinson , astrophys . j. * 306 * , 341 ( 1986 ) ; d. h. weinberg , publ . pacific * 100 * , 1373 ( 1988 ) . g. watanabe , phd thesis , univ . of tokyo ( 2003 ) . existence of some phase with a complicated structure is also suggested by p. magierski and p. h. heenen , phys . c * 65 * , 045804 ( 2002 ) . they focus on shell effects of dripped neutrons . non - integral values of the `` dimensionality '' @xmath131 in the early work done by ravenhall et al . @xcite also suggest the possibilty of complicated nuclear shapes . akmal , v. r. pandharipande and d. g. ravenhall , phys . c * 58 * , 1804 ( 1998 ) . b. friedman and v. r. pandharipande , nucl . a361 * , 501 ( 1981 ) . c. j. pethick , d. g. ravenhall and c. p. lorenz , nucl . phys . * a584 * , 675 ( 1995 ) . f. douchin and p. haensel , phys . lett . * b485 * , 107 ( 2000 ) . o. sjberg , nucl . a222 * , 161 ( 1974 ) . j. siemens and v. r. pandharipande , nucl . a173 * , 561 ( 1971 ) . d. g. ravenhall , c. d. bennett and c. j. pethick , phys . rev . lett . * 28 * , 978 ( 1972 ) . m. p. tosi , in : f. seitz and d. turnbull ( eds . ) , _ solid state physics : advances in research and applications _ ( academic press , new york , 1964 ) p. 1 . h. takemoto , t. ohyama and a. tohsaki , prog . . phys . * 109 * , 563 ( 2003 ) . Abstract:
[ "structure of cold nuclear matter at subnuclear densities for the proton fraction @xmath0 , 0.3 and 0.1 is investigated by quantum molecular dynamics ( qmd ) simulations . we demonstrate that the phases with slablike and rodlike nuclei , etc . can be formed dynamically from hot uniform nuclear matter without any assumptions on nuclear shape , and also systematically analyze the structure of cold matter using two - point correlation functions and minkowski functionals . in our simulations , we also observe intermediate phases , which has complicated nuclear shapes . it is found out that these phases can be characterized as those with negative euler characteristic . our result implies the existence of these kinds of phases in addition to the simple `` pasta '' phases in neutron star crusts and supernova inner cores . in addition , we investigate the properties of the effective qmd interaction used in the present work to examine the validity of our results . the resultant energy per nucleon @xmath1 of the pure neutron matter , the proton chemical @xmath2 in pure neutron matter and the nuclear surface tension @xmath3 are generally reasonable in comparison with other nuclear interactions ." ]
13,668
13,668
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: synchronization is a dynamical process where two or more interacting oscillatory systems end up with identical movement . in 1665 huygens experimented with maritime pendulum clocks and discovered the anti - phase synchronization of two pendulums clocks mounted on the common frame @xcite . since then , synchronization has become a basic concept in nonlinear and complex systems @xcite . such systems include , but are not limited to , musical instruments , electric power systems , and lasers . there are numerous applications in mechanical @xcite and electrical @xcite engineering . new applications are found in mathematical biology such as synchronous variation of cell nuclei , firing of neurons , forms of cooperative behavior of animals and humans @xcite . recently , huygen s experiment has been widely discussed and several experimental devices were built @xcite . it was shown that two real mechanical clocks when mounted to a horizontally moving beam can synchronize both in - phase and anti - phase @xcite . in all these experiments synchronization was achieved due to energy transfer via the oscillating beam , supporting huygen s intuition @xcite . one of the rapidly developing areas in between physics and mathematics , is the topic of @xmath1-symmetry , which has started as a way to characterize non - hermitian hamiltonians in quantum mechanics @xcite . the key idea is that a linear schrdinger operator with a complex - valued potential , which is symmetric with respect to combined parity ( @xmath2 ) and time - reversal(@xmath3 ) transformations , may have a real spectrum up to a certain critical value of the complex potential amplitude . in nonlinear systems , this distinctive feature may lead to existence of breathers ( time - periodic solutions localized in space ) as continuous families of their energy parameter . the most basic configuration having @xmath1 symmetry is a dimer , which represents a system of two coupled oscillators , one of which has damping losses and the other one gains some energy from external sources . this configuration was studied in numerous laboratory experiments involving electric circuits @xcite , superconductivity @xcite , optics @xcite and microwave cavities @xcite . in the context of synchronization of coupled oscillators in a @xmath1-symmetric system , one of the recent experiments was performed by bender et al . these authors considered a @xmath1-symmetric hamiltonian system describing the motion of two coupled pendula whose bases were connected by a horizontal rope which moves periodically in resonance with the pendula . the phase transition phenomenon , which is typical for @xmath1-symmetric systems , happens when some of the real eigenvalues of the complex - valued hamiltonian become complex . the latter regime is said to have _ broken _ @xmath1 symmetry . on the analytical side , dimer equations were found to be completely integrable @xcite . integrability of dimers is obtained by using stokes variables and it is lost when more coupled nonlinear oscillators are added into a @xmath0-symmetric system . nevertheless , it was understood recently @xcite that there is a remarkable class of @xmath0-symmetric dimers with cross - gradient hamiltonian structure , where the real - valued hamiltonians exist both in finite and infinite chains of coupled nonlinear oscillators . analysis of synchronization in the infinite chains of coupled oscillators in such class of models is a subject of this work . in the rest of this section , we describe how this paper is organized . we also describe the main findings obtained in this work . section [ model ] introduces the main model of coupled pendula driven by a resonant periodic movement of their common strings . see figure [ pendulapic ] for a schematic picture . by using an asymptotic multi - scale method , the oscillatory dynamics of coupled pendula is reduced to a @xmath0-symmetric discrete nonlinear schrdinger ( dnls ) equation with gains and losses . this equation generalizes the dimer equation derived in @xcite . section [ symmetry ] describes symmetries and conserved quantities for the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation . in particular , we show that the cross - gradient hamiltonian structure obtained in @xcite naturally appears in the asymptotic reduction of the original hamiltonian structure of newton s equations of motion for the coupled pendula . section [ breathers ] is devoted to characterization of breathers , which are time - periodic solutions localized in the chain . we show that depending on parameters of the model ( such as detuning frequency , coupling constant , driving force amplitude ) , there are three possible types of breather solutions . for the first type , breathers of small and large amplitudes are connected to each other and do not extend to symmetric synchronized oscillations of coupled pendula . in the second and third types , large - amplitude and small - amplitude breathers are connected to the symmetric synchronized oscillations but are not connected to each other . see figure [ branches ] with branches ( a ) , ( b ) , and ( c ) , where the symmetric synchronized oscillations correspond to the value @xmath4 and the breather amplitude is given by parameter @xmath5 . section [ zero - equilibrium ] contains a routine analysis of linear stability of the zero equilibrium , where the phase transition threshold to the broken @xmath0-symmetry phase is explicitly found . breathers are only studied for the parameters where the zero equilibrium is linearly stable . section [ variational ] explores the hamiltonian structure of the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation and characterizes breathers obtained in section [ breathers ] from their energetic point of view . we show that the breathers for large value of parameter @xmath6 appear to be saddle points of the hamiltonian function between continuous spectra of positive and negative energy , similar to the standing waves in the dirac models . therefore , it is not clear from the energetic point of view if such breathers are linearly or nonlinearly stable . on the other hand , we show that the breathers for smaller values of parameter @xmath6 appear to be saddle points of the hamiltonian function with a negative continuous spectrum and finitely many ( either three or one ) positive eigenvalues . section [ stability ] is devoted to analysis of spectral and orbital stability of breathers . for spectral stability , we use the limit of small coupling constant between the oscillators ( the same limit is also used in sections [ breathers ] and [ variational ] ) and characterize eigenvalues of the linearized operator . the main analytical results are also confirmed numerically . see figure [ spectra ] for the three types of breathers . depending on the location of the continuous spectral bands relative to the location of the isolated eigenvalues , we are able to prove nonlinear orbital stability of breathers for branches ( b ) and ( c ) . we are also able to characterize instabilities of these types of breathers that emerge depending on parameters of the model . regarding branch ( a ) , nonlinear stability analysis is not available by using the energy method . our follow - up work @xcite develops a new method of analysis to prove the long - time stability of breathers for branch ( a ) . the summary of our findings is given in the concluding section [ conclusion ] , where the main results are shown in the form of table 1 . a simple yet universal model widely used to study coupled nonlinear oscillators is the frenkel - kontorova ( fk ) model @xcite . it describes a chain of classical particles coupled to their neighbors and subjected to a periodic on - site potential . in the continuum approximation , the fk model reduces to the sine - gordon equation , which is exactly integrable . the fk model is known to describe a rich variety of important nonlinear phenomena , which find applications in solid - state physics and nonlinear science @xcite . we consider here a two - array system of coupled pendula , where each pendulum is connected to the nearest neighbors by linear couplings . figure [ pendulapic ] shows schematically that each array of pendula is connected in the longitudinal direction by the torsional springs , whereas each pair of pendula is connected in the transverse direction by a common string . newton s equations of motion are given by @xmath7 where @xmath8 correspond to the angles of two arrays of pendula , dots denote derivatives of angles with respect to time @xmath9 , and the positive parameters @xmath10 and @xmath11 describe couplings between the two arrays in the longitudinal and transverse directions , respectively . the type of coupling between the two pendula with the angles @xmath12 and @xmath13 is referred to as the _ direct coupling _ between nonlinear oscillators ( see section 8.2 in @xcite ) . we consider oscillatory dynamics of coupled pendula under the following assumptions . * the coupling parameters @xmath10 and @xmath11 are small . therefore , we can introduce a small parameter @xmath14 such that both @xmath10 and @xmath11 are proportional to @xmath15 . * a resonant periodic force is applied to the common strings for each pair of coupled pendula . therefore , @xmath11 is considered to be proportional to @xmath16 , where @xmath17 is selected near the unit frequency of linear pendula indicating the @xmath18 parametric resonance between the force and the pendula . mathematically , we impose the following representation for parameters @xmath10 and @xmath19 : @xmath20 where @xmath21 are @xmath14-independent parameters , whereas @xmath14 is the formal small parameter to characterize the two assumptions ( a1 ) and ( a2 ) . in the formal limit @xmath22 , the pendula are uncoupled , and their small - amplitude oscillations can be studied with the asymptotic multi - scale expansion @xmath23 + \mu^3 x_n(t;\mu ) , \\[3pt ] y_n(t ) = \mu \left [ b_n(\mu^2 t ) e^{i \omega t } + \bar{b}_n(\mu^2 t ) e^{-i \omega t } \right ] + \mu^3 y_n(t;\mu ) , \end{array } \right . \label{expansion}\ ] ] where @xmath24 are amplitudes for nearly harmonic oscillations and @xmath25 are remainder terms . in a similar context of single - array coupled nonlinear oscillators , it is shown in @xcite how the asymptotic expansions like ( [ expansion ] ) can be justified . from the conditions that the remainder terms @xmath25 remain bounded as the system evolves , the amplitudes @xmath24 are shown to satisfy the discrete nonlinear schrdinger ( dnls ) equations , which bring together all the phenomena affecting the nearly harmonic oscillations ( such as cubic nonlinear terms , the detuning frequency , the coupling between the oscillators , and the amplitude of the parametric driving force ) . a similar derivation for a single pair of coupled pendula is reported in @xcite . using the algorithm in @xcite and restricting the scopes of this derivation to the formal level , we write the truncated system of equations for the remainder terms : @xmath26 where @xmath27 and @xmath28 are uniquely defined . bounded solutions to the linear inhomogeneous equations ( [ linear - equation ] ) exist if and only if @xmath29 for every @xmath30 . straightforward computations show that the conditions @xmath29 are equivalent to the following evolution equations for slowly varying amplitudes @xmath24 : @xmath31 the system ( [ dnls ] ) takes the form of coupled parametrically forced dnls equations ( see @xcite for references on parametrically forced nls equations ) . there exists an invariant reduction of system ( [ dnls ] ) given by @xmath32 to the scalar parametrically forced dnls equation . the reduction ( [ synchr-1 ] ) corresponds to the symmetric synchronized oscillations of coupled pendula of the model ( [ oscillators ] ) with @xmath33 in what follows , we consider a more general class of synchronized oscillations of coupled pendula . it turns out that the model ( [ dnls ] ) can be cast to the form of the parity time reversal ( @xmath0 ) dnls equations @xcite . using the variables @xmath34 the system of coupled dnls equations ( [ dnls ] ) is rewritten in the equivalent form @xmath35 , \\[3pt ] 2 i \dot{v}_n = \epsilon \left ( u_{n+1 } - 2 u_n + u_{n-1 } \right ) + \omega u_n - i \gamma v_n + 2\left [ \left ( |u_n|^2 + 2 |v_n|^2 \right ) u_n + \bar{u}_n v_n^2 \right ] , \end{array } \right . \label{pt - dnls}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which is the starting point for our analytical and numerical work . the invariant reduction ( [ synchr-1 ] ) for system ( [ dnls ] ) becomes @xmath36 without loss of generality , one can scale parameters @xmath37 , @xmath38 , and @xmath39 by a factor of two in order to eliminate the numerical factors in the system ( [ pt - dnls ] ) . also in the context of hard nonlinear oscillators ( e.g. in the framework of the @xmath40 theory ) , the cubic nonlinearity may have the opposite sign compared to the one in the system ( [ pt - dnls ] ) . however , given the applied context of the system of coupled pendula , we will stick to the specific form ( [ pt - dnls ] ) in further analysis . the system of coupled dnls equations ( [ pt - dnls ] ) is referred to as the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation because the solutions remain invariant with respect to the action of the parity @xmath2 and time - reversal @xmath3 operators given by @xmath41 = \left [ \begin{array}{c } v \\ u \end{array } \right ] , \qquad \mathcal{t } \left [ \begin{array}{c } u(t ) \\ v(t ) \end{array } \right ] = \left [ \begin{array}{c } \bar{u}(-t ) \\ \bar{v}(-t ) \end{array } \right].\ ] ] the parameter @xmath39 introduces the gain loss coefficient in each pair of coupled oscillators due to the resonant periodic force . in the absence of all other effects , the @xmath39-term of the first equation of system ( [ pt - dnls ] ) induces the exponential growth of amplitude @xmath42 , whereas the @xmath39-term of the second equation induces the exponential decay of amplitude @xmath43 , if @xmath44 . the system ( [ pt - dnls ] ) truncated at a single site ( say @xmath45 ) is called the @xmath0-symmetric dimer . in the work of barashenkov _ et al . _ @xcite , it was shown that all @xmath0-symmetric dimers with physically relevant cubic nonlinearities represent hamiltonian systems in appropriately introduced canonical variables . however , the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation on a lattice does not typically have a hamiltonian form if @xmath46 . nevertheless , the particular nonlinear functions arising in the system ( [ pt - dnls ] ) correspond to the @xmath0-symmetric dimers with a cross gradient hamiltonian structure @xcite , where variables @xmath47 are canonically conjugate . as a result , the system ( [ pt - dnls ] ) on the chain @xmath48 has additional conserved quantities . this fact looked like a mystery in the recent works @xcite . here we clarify the mystery in the context of the derivation of the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) from the original system ( [ oscillators ] ) . indeed , the system ( [ oscillators ] ) of classical newton particles has a standard hamiltonian structure with the energy function @xmath49 since the periodic movement of common strings for each pair of pendula result in the time - periodic coefficient @xmath19 , the energy @xmath50 is a periodic function of time @xmath9 . in addition , no other conserved quantities such as momenta exist typically in lattice differential systems such as the system ( [ oscillators ] ) due to broken continuous translational symmetry . after the system ( [ oscillators ] ) is reduced to the coupled dnls equations ( [ dnls ] ) with the asymptotic expansion ( [ expansion ] ) , we can write the evolution problem ( [ dnls ] ) in the hamiltonian form with the standard straight - gradient symplectic structure @xmath51 where the time variable @xmath9 stands now for the slow time @xmath52 and the energy function is @xmath53 the energy function @xmath54 is conserved in the time evolution of the hamiltonian system ( [ hamiltonian - dnls ] ) . in addition , there exists another conserved quantity @xmath55 which is related to the gauge symmetry @xmath56 with @xmath57 for solutions to the system ( [ dnls ] ) . when the transformation of variables ( [ variables ] ) is used , the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) is cast to the hamiltonian form with the cross - gradient symplectic structure @xmath58 where the energy function is @xmath59 the gauge - related function is written in the form @xmath60 the functions @xmath61 and @xmath62 are conserved in the time evolution of the system ( [ pt - dnls ] ) . these functions follow from ( [ energy - dnls ] ) and ( [ charge - dnls ] ) after the transformation ( [ variables ] ) is used . thus , the cross - gradient hamiltonian structure of the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) is inherited from the hamiltonian structure of the coupled oscillator model ( [ oscillators ] ) . we characterize the existence of breathers supported by the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) . in particular , breather solutions are continued for small values of coupling constant @xmath38 from solutions of the dimer equation arising at a single site , say the central site at @xmath45 . we shall work in a sequence space @xmath63 of square integrable complex - valued sequences . time - periodic solutions to the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) are given in the form @xcite : @xmath64 where the parameter @xmath6 is considered to be real , the factor @xmath65 is introduced for convenience , and the sequence @xmath66 is time - independent . the breather ( [ stationary ] ) is a localized mode if @xmath67 , which implies that @xmath68 as @xmath69 . the breather ( [ stationary ] ) is considered to be @xmath0-symmetric with respect to the operators in ( [ pt - symmetry ] ) if @xmath70 . the reduction ( [ reduction ] ) for symmetric synchronized oscillations is satisfied if @xmath71 the time - periodic breathers ( [ stationary ] ) with @xmath72 generalize the class of symmetric synchronized oscillations ( [ reduction - e ] ) . the time - independent sequence @xmath67 can be found from the stationary @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation : @xmath73 , \\[3pt ] e v_n = \epsilon \left ( u_{n+1 } - 2 u_n + u_{n-1 } \right ) + \omega u_n - i \gamma v_n + 2\left [ \left ( |u_n|^2 + 2 |v_n|^2 \right ) u_n + \bar{u}_n v_n^2 \right ] . \end{array } \right . \label{eq : state}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the @xmath0-symmetric breathers with @xmath70 satisfy the following scalar difference equation @xmath74 note that the reduction ( [ reduction - e ] ) is compatible with equation ( [ eq : statpt ] ) in the sense that if @xmath4 and @xmath75 , then @xmath76 satisfies a real - valued difference equation . let us set @xmath77 for now and consider solutions to the dimer equation at the central site @xmath45 : @xmath78 the parameters @xmath39 and @xmath37 are considered to be fixed , and the breather parameter @xmath6 is thought to parameterize continuous branches of solutions to the nonlinear algebraic equation ( [ dimer - states ] ) . the solution branches depicted on figure [ branches ] are given in the following lemma . ) . ] [ lemma - dimer ] assume @xmath46 . the algebraic equation ( [ dimer - states ] ) admits the following solutions depending on @xmath39 and @xmath37 : * @xmath79 - two symmetric unbounded branches exist for @xmath80 , * @xmath81 - an unbounded branch exists for every @xmath82 , * @xmath83 - a bounded branch exists for @xmath84 , where @xmath85 . substituting the decomposition @xmath86 with @xmath87 and @xmath88 into the algebraic equation ( [ dimer - states ] ) , we obtain @xmath89 excluding @xmath90 by using the fundamental trigonometric identity , we obtain the explicit parametrization of the solutions to the algebraic equation ( [ dimer - states ] ) by the amplitude parameter @xmath5 : @xmath91.\ ] ] the zero - amplitude limit @xmath92 is reached if @xmath93 , in which case @xmath94 , where @xmath85 . if @xmath95 , the solution branches ( if they exist ) are bounded away from the zero solution . now we analyze the three cases of parameters @xmath39 and @xmath37 formulated in the lemma . * if @xmath79 , then the parametrization ( [ branch - e - a ] ) yields a monotonically increasing map @xmath96 because @xmath97 > 0.\ ] ] in the two asymptotic limits , we obtain from ( [ branch - e - a ] ) : @xmath98 see figure [ branches](a ) . * if @xmath81 , the parametrization ( [ branch - e - a ] ) yields a monotonically increasing map @xmath99 , where @xmath100 indeed , we note that @xmath101 and @xmath102 so that the derivative in ( [ positivity - a ] ) is positive for every @xmath103 . we have @xmath104 see figure [ branches](b ) . * if @xmath83 , then the parametrization ( [ branch - e - a ] ) yields a monotonically decreasing map @xmath105 , where @xmath106 in ( [ a - minus ] ) , the first choice is made if @xmath107 and the second choice is made if @xmath108 . both choices are the same if @xmath109 . we note that @xmath110 , therefore , the derivative ( [ positivity - a ] ) needs to be rewritten in the form @xmath111 < 0,\ ] ] where @xmath112 for both @xmath107 and @xmath113 . in the two asymptotic limits , we obtain from ( [ branch - e - a ] ) : @xmath114 see figure [ branches](c ) . note that branches ( b ) and ( c ) coexist for @xmath83 . the reduction ( [ reduction - e ] ) corresponds to the choice : @xmath115 if @xmath44 , this choice corresponds to @xmath116 for @xmath117 , that is , the point @xmath4 on branch ( c ) . if @xmath118 , it corresponds to @xmath119 for any @xmath81 , that is , the point @xmath4 on branch ( b ) . every solution of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] can be extended to a breather on the chain @xmath48 which satisfies the spatial symmetry condition in addition to the @xmath0 symmetry : @xmath120 in order to prove the existence of the symmetric breather solution to the difference equation ( [ eq : statpt ] ) , we use the following implicit function theorem . + * implicit function theorem * ( theorem 4.e in @xcite ) . _ let @xmath121 and @xmath122 be banach spaces and let @xmath123 be a @xmath124 map on an open neighborhood of the point @xmath125 . assume that @xmath126 and that @xmath127 there are @xmath128 and @xmath129 such that for each @xmath130 with @xmath131 there exists a unique solution @xmath132 of the nonlinear equation @xmath133 with @xmath134 . moreover , the map @xmath135 is @xmath124 near @xmath136 . _ with two applications of the implicit function theorem , we prove the following main result of this section . [ theorem - existence - soliton ] fix @xmath46 , @xmath137 , and @xmath138 , where @xmath139 if @xmath93 . there exists @xmath140 sufficiently small and @xmath141 such that for every @xmath142 , there exists a unique solution @xmath143 to the difference equation ( [ eq : statpt ] ) satisfying the symmetry ( [ spatial - symmetry ] ) and the bound @xmath144 where @xmath5 and @xmath90 are defined in lemma [ lemma - dimer ] . moreover , the solution @xmath145 is smooth in @xmath38 . in the first application of the implicit function theorem , we consider the following system of algebraic equations @xmath146 where @xmath147 is given , in addition to parameters @xmath39 , @xmath37 , and @xmath6 . let @xmath148 , @xmath149 , @xmath150 , @xmath151 , and @xmath152 . then , we have @xmath153 and the jacobian operator @xmath154 is given by identical copies of the matrix @xmath155,\ ] ] with the eigenvalues @xmath156 . by the assumption of the lemma , @xmath157 , so that the jacobian operator @xmath154 is one - to - one and onto . by the implicit function theorem , for every @xmath147 and every @xmath158 sufficiently small , there exists a unique small solution @xmath159 of the system ( [ fixed - point-1 ] ) such that @xmath160 where the positive constant @xmath161 is independent from @xmath38 and @xmath162 . thanks to the symmetry of the difference equation ( [ eq : statpt ] ) , we find that @xmath163 , @xmath164 satisfy the same system ( [ fixed - point-1 ] ) with @xmath165 , with the same unique solution . in the second application of the implicit function theorem , we consider the following algebraic equation @xmath166 where @xmath167 depends on @xmath162 , @xmath39 , @xmath37 , and @xmath6 , satisfies the bound ( [ eq : u ] ) , and is uniquely defined by the previous result . let @xmath168 , @xmath169 , @xmath150 , @xmath151 , and @xmath170 . then , we have @xmath171 , where @xmath5 and @xmath90 are defined in lemma [ lemma - dimer ] . the jacobian operator @xmath172 is given by the matrix @xmath173 \biggr|_{u_0 = a e^{i \theta } } \\ \label{matrix - jacobian } & = & \left [ \begin{array}{cc } e - i \gamma - \frac{12 e a^2}{\omega + 8 a^2 } & -\omega - 12 a^2 \\ -\omega - 12 a^2 & e + i \gamma - \frac{12 e a^2}{\omega + 8 a^2 } \end{array } \right].\end{aligned}\ ] ] we show in lemma [ proposition - unbounded ] below that the matrix given by ( [ matrix - jacobian ] ) is invertible under the conditions @xmath46 and @xmath174 . by the implicit function theorem , for every @xmath158 sufficiently small , there exists a unique solution @xmath147 to the algebraic equation ( [ fixed - point-2 ] ) near @xmath175 such that @xmath176 where the positive constant @xmath177 is independent from @xmath38 . the bound ( [ bound - soliton ] ) holds thanks to the bounds ( [ eq : u ] ) and ( [ eq : u0 ] ) . since both equations ( [ fixed - point-1 ] ) and ( [ fixed - point-2 ] ) are smooth in @xmath38 , the solution @xmath145 is smooth in @xmath38 . in the following result , we show that the matrix given by ( [ matrix - jacobian ] ) is invertible for every branch of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] with an exception of a single point @xmath4 on branch ( c ) for @xmath178 . [ proposition - unbounded ] with the exception of the point @xmath4 on branch ( c ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] for @xmath178 , the matrix given by ( [ matrix - jacobian ] ) is invertible for every @xmath46 . the matrix given by ( [ matrix - jacobian ] ) has zero eigenvalue if and only if its determinant is zero , which happens at @xmath179 eliminating @xmath180 by using parametrization ( [ branch - e - a ] ) and simplifying the algebraic equation for nonzero @xmath181 , we reduce it to the form @xmath182 we now check if this constraint can be satisfied for the three branches of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] . * if @xmath79 , the constraint ( [ constraint - parameters ] ) is not satisfied because the left - hand side @xmath183 exceeds the right - hand side @xmath184 . * if @xmath81 and @xmath103 , where @xmath185 is given by ( [ a - plus ] ) , the constraint ( [ constraint - parameters ] ) is not satisfied because the left - hand side @xmath186 exceeds the left - hand side @xmath184 both for @xmath187 and for @xmath188 . * if @xmath83 and @xmath189 , where @xmath190 is given by ( [ a - minus ] ) , the constraint ( [ constraint - parameters ] ) is not satisfied because the left - hand side is estimated by @xmath191 in the first case , we have @xmath192 , so that the left - hand side is strictly smaller than @xmath193 . in the second case , we have @xmath194 , so that the left - hand side is also strictly smaller than @xmath193 . only if @xmath109 , the constraint ( [ constraint - parameters ] ) is satisfied at @xmath4 , when @xmath195 and @xmath196 hence , the matrix ( [ matrix - jacobian ] ) is invertible for all parameter values with one exceptional case . in the asymptotic limit @xmath197 as @xmath198 , see lemma [ lemma - dimer ] , the matrix ( [ matrix - jacobian ] ) is expanded asymptotically as @xmath199 + \mathcal{o}(1 ) \quad \mbox{\rm as } \quad |e| \to \infty , \label{matrix - jacobian - asymptotics}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the two eigenvalues @xmath200 and @xmath201 . thus , the matrix given by ( [ matrix - jacobian - asymptotics ] ) is invertible for every branch extending to sufficiently large values of @xmath6 . here we discuss the linear stability of the zero equilibrium in the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) . the following proposition yields a simple result . the zero equilibrium of the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) is linearly stable if @xmath202 , where @xmath203 . [ prop - zero - equilibrium ] truncating the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) at the linear terms and using the fourier transform @xmath204 we obtain the linear homogeneous system @xmath205 = \left [ \begin{array}{c } 0 \\ 0 \end{array } \right ] , \quad \mbox{\rm where } \quad \hat{d}(k ) : = \left [ \begin{matrix } -2 \omega(k ) - i \gamma & -\omega + 4 \epsilon \sin^2(k/2 ) \\ -\omega + 4 \epsilon \sin^2(k/2 ) & -2 \omega(k ) + i \gamma \end{matrix } \right].\ ] ] the determinant of @xmath206 is zero if and only if @xmath207 is found from the quadratic equation @xmath208 for any @xmath202 , where @xmath209 is given by ( [ gamma-0 ] ) , the two branches @xmath210 found from the quadratic equation ( [ dispersion - relation ] ) are real - valued and non - degenerate for every @xmath211 $ ] . therefore , the zero equilibrium is linearly stable . on the other hand , for any @xmath212 , the values of @xmath207 are purely imaginary either near @xmath213 if @xmath214 or near @xmath215 if @xmath188 . therefore , the zero equilibrium is linearly unstable . the value @xmath209 given by ( [ gamma-0 ] ) represents the phase transition threshold and the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) is said to have broken @xmath0-symmetry for @xmath212 . if @xmath77 , the zero equilibrium is only linearly stable for @xmath216 . since the localized breathers can not be stable when the zero background is unstable , we shall study stability of breathers only for the case when @xmath216 , that is , in the regime of unbroken @xmath0-symmetry . it follows from theorem [ theorem - existence - soliton ] that each interior point on the solution branches shown on figure [ branches ] generates a fundamental breather of the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) . we shall now characterize these breathers as relative equilibria of the energy function . thanks to the cross - gradient symplectic structure ( [ hamiltonian - pt - dnls ] ) , the stationary @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation can be written in the gradient form @xmath217 keeping in mind the additional conserved quantity @xmath62 given by ( [ charge - pt - dnls ] ) , we conclude that the stationary solution @xmath66 is a critical point of the combined energy function given by @xmath218 if we want to apply the lyapunov method in order to study nonlinear stability of stationary solutions in hamiltonian systems , we shall investigate convexity of the second variation of the combined energy functional @xmath219 at @xmath66 . using the expansion @xmath220 , @xmath221 and introducing extended variables @xmath222 and @xmath223 with the blocks @xmath224 we can expand the smooth function @xmath219 up to the quadratic terms in @xmath223 : @xmath225 where @xmath226 is the self - adjoint ( hessian ) operator defined on @xmath63 and the scalar product was used in the following form : @xmath227 using ( [ energy - pt - dnls ] ) and ( [ charge - pt - dnls ] ) , the hessian operator can be computed explicitly as follows @xmath228 where blocks of @xmath229 at each lattice node @xmath30 are given by @xmath230\end{aligned}\]]and @xmath231 is the discrete laplacian operator applied to blocks of @xmath223 at each lattice node @xmath30 : @xmath232 in the expression for @xmath233 , we have used the @xmath0-symmetry condition @xmath70 for the given stationary solution @xmath66 . we study convexity of the combined energy functional @xmath219 at @xmath66 . since the zero equilibrium is linearly stable only for @xmath216 ( if @xmath77 ) , we only consider breathers of theorem [ theorem - existence - soliton ] for @xmath216 . in order to study eigenvalues of @xmath226 for small values of @xmath38 , we use the following perturbation theory . + * perturbation theory for linear operators * ( theorem vii.1.7 in @xcite ) . _ let @xmath234 be a family of bounded operators from banach space @xmath235 to itself , which depends analytically on the small parameter @xmath38 . if the spectrum of @xmath236 is separated into two parts , the subspaces of @xmath235 corresponding to the separated parts also depend analytically on @xmath38 . in particular , the spectrum of @xmath234 is separated into two parts for any @xmath158 sufficiently small . _ with an application of the perturbation theory for linear operators , we prove the following main result of this section . [ theorem - critical - point ] fix @xmath46 , @xmath37 , and @xmath6 along branches of the @xmath0-symmetric breathers @xmath66 given by theorem [ theorem - existence - soliton ] such that @xmath93 and @xmath138 , where @xmath139 . for every @xmath237 sufficiently small , the operator @xmath226 admits a one - dimensional kernel in @xmath63 spanned by the eigenvector @xmath238 due to the gauge invariance , where the blocks of the eigenvector are given by @xmath239 in addition , * if @xmath240 , the spectrum of @xmath226 in @xmath63 includes infinite - dimensional positive and negative parts . * if @xmath241 and @xmath83 , the spectrum of @xmath242 in @xmath63 includes an infinite - dimensional negative part and either three or one simple positive eigenvalues for branches ( b ) and ( c ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] respectively . if @xmath77 , the breather solution of theorem [ theorem - existence - soliton ] is given by @xmath243 for every @xmath244 and @xmath86 , where @xmath5 and @xmath90 are defined by lemma [ lemma - dimer ] . in this case , the linear operator @xmath245 decouples into @xmath246-by-@xmath246 blocks for each lattice node @xmath30 . for @xmath45 , the @xmath246-by-@xmath246 block of the linear operator @xmath229 is given by @xmath247.\]]using relations ( [ parameterization - a ] ) and ( [ branch - e - a ] ) , as well as symbolic computations with maple , we found that the @xmath246-by-@xmath246 matrix block @xmath248 admits a simple zero eigenvalue and three nonzero eigenvalues @xmath249 , @xmath250 , and @xmath251 given by @xmath252 for each branch of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] with @xmath46 and @xmath138 , we have @xmath253 , so that @xmath254 . furthermore , either @xmath255 or @xmath256 if and only if @xmath257 expanding this equation for nonzero @xmath5 yields constraint ( [ constraint - parameters ] ) . with the exception of a single point @xmath4 at @xmath178 , we showed in lemma [ proposition - unbounded ] that the constraint ( [ constraint - parameters ] ) does not hold for any of the branches of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] . therefore , @xmath258 and @xmath259 along each branch of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] and the signs of @xmath249 , @xmath250 , and @xmath251 for each branch of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] can be obtained in the limit @xmath198 for branches ( a ) and ( b ) or @xmath260 for branch ( c ) . by means of these asymptotic computations as @xmath198 or @xmath260 , we obtain the following results for the three branches shown on figure [ branches ] : * @xmath261 . * @xmath261 . * @xmath262 , @xmath263 , and @xmath264 . for @xmath265 , the @xmath246-by-@xmath246 block of the linear operator @xmath229 is given by @xmath266.\ ] ] each block has two double eigenvalues @xmath267 and @xmath268 given by @xmath269 since there are infinitely many nodes with @xmath244 , the points @xmath267 and @xmath268 have infinite multiplicity in the spectrum of the linear operator @xmath229 . furthermore , we can sort up the signs of @xmath267 and @xmath268 for each point on the three branches shown on figure [ branches ] : * if @xmath270 , then @xmath271 and @xmath272 . * if @xmath241 and @xmath83 , then @xmath273 . by using the perturbation theory for linear operators , we argue as follows : * since @xmath226 is hermitian on @xmath63 , its spectrum is a subset of the real line for every @xmath158 . * the zero eigenvalue persists with respect to @xmath158 at zero because the eigenvector ( [ kernel ] ) belongs to the kernel of @xmath226 due to the gauge invariance for every @xmath158 . * the other eigenvalues of @xmath229 are isolated away from zero . the spectrum of @xmath226 is continuous with respect to @xmath38 and includes infinite - dimensional parts near points @xmath267 and @xmath268 for small @xmath237 ( which may include continuous spectrum and isolated eigenvalues ) as well as simple eigenvalues near @xmath274 ( if @xmath274 are different from @xmath275 ) . the statement of the theorem follows from the perturbation theory and the count of signs of @xmath274 and @xmath275 above . in the asymptotic limit @xmath197 as @xmath198 , we can sort out eigenvalues of @xmath226 asymptotically as : @xmath276 where the remainder terms are @xmath277 as @xmath278 . the values @xmath249 , @xmath251 , and @xmath267 are close to each other as @xmath278 . it follows from theorem [ theorem - critical - point ] that for @xmath240 , the breather @xmath66 is a saddle point of the energy functional @xmath219 with infinite - dimensional positive and negative invariant subspaces of the hessian operator @xmath226 . this is very similar to the hamiltonian systems of the dirac type , where stationary states are located in the gap between the positive and negative continuous spectrum . this property holds for points 1 and 3 on branches ( a ) and ( b ) shown on figure [ branches ] . no branches other than @xmath240 exist for @xmath79 . on the other hand , points 2 and 4 on branches ( b ) and ( c ) shown on figure [ branches ] satisfy @xmath241 and @xmath83 . the breather @xmath66 is a saddle point of @xmath219 for these points and it only has three ( one ) directions of positive energy in space @xmath63 for point 2 ( point 4 ) . spectral stability of breathers can be studied for small values of coupling constant @xmath38 by using the perturbation theory @xcite . first , we linearize the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) at the breather ( [ stationary ] ) by using the expansion @xmath279 , \quad v(t ) = e^{-\frac{1}{2 } i et } \left [ v + { \bf v}(t ) \right],\ ] ] where @xmath280 is a small perturbation satisfying the linearized equations @xmath281 , \\ 2 i \dot{{\bf v}}_n + e { \bf v}_n = \epsilon \left ( { \bf u}_{n+1 } - 2 { \bf u}_n + { \bf u}_{n-1 } \right ) + \omega { \bf u}_n - i \gamma { \bf v}_n \\ \phantom{text } + 2 \left [ 2 \left ( |u_n|^2 + |v_n|^2 \right ) { \bf u}_n + ( u_n^2 + v_n^2 ) \bar{{\bf u}}_n + 2 ( \bar{u}_n v_n + u_n \bar{v}_n ) { \bf v}_n + 2 u_n v_n \bar{{\bf v}}_n \right ] . \end{array } \right . \label{pt - dnls - lin}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the spectral stability problem arises from the linearized equations ( [ pt - dnls - lin ] ) after the separation of variables : @xmath282 where @xmath283 is the eigenvector corresponding to the spectral parameter @xmath284 . note that @xmath285 and @xmath286 are no longer complex conjugate to each other if @xmath284 has a nonzero imaginary part . the spectral problem can be written in the explicit form @xmath287 , \\ ( e - i \lambda + i \gamma ) \psi_n - \omega \nu_n = \epsilon \left ( \nu_{n+1 } - 2 \nu_n + \nu_{n-1 } \right ) \\ \phantom{texttext } + 2 \left [ 2 |u_n|^2 ( \varphi_n + 2\nu_n ) + ( u_n^2 + \bar{u}_n^2 ) ( 2 \psi_n + \chi_n ) \right ] , \\ ( e + i \lambda + i \gamma ) \chi_n - \omega \varphi_n = \epsilon \left ( \varphi_{n+1 } - 2 \varphi_n + \varphi_{n-1 } \right ) \\ \phantom{texttext } + 2 \left [ 2 |u_n|^2 ( 2 \varphi_n + \nu_n ) + ( u_n^2 + \bar{u}_n^2 ) ( \psi_n + 2 \chi_n ) \right ] , \\ ( e - i \lambda - i \gamma ) \nu_n - \omega \psi_n = \epsilon \left ( \psi_{n+1 } - 2 \psi_n + \psi_{n-1 } \right ) \\ \phantom{texttext } + 2 \left [ 2 |u_n|^2 ( 2 \psi_n + \chi_n ) + ( u_n^2 + \bar{u}_n^2 ) ( \varphi_n + 2 \nu_n ) \right ] , \end{array } \right.\ ] ] where we have used the condition @xmath70 for the @xmath0-symmetric breathers . recalling definition of the hessian operator @xmath226 in ( [ pt - dnls - var ] ) , we can rewrite the spectral problem ( [ spectral - problem ] ) in the hamiltonian form : @xmath288 where @xmath289 is a symmetric matrix with the blocks at each lattice node @xmath30 given by @xmath290.\ ] ] we note the hamiltonian symmetry of the eigenvalues of the spectral problem ( [ eq : eigenval ] ) . [ prop - ham - sym ] eigenvalues of the spectral problem ( [ eq : eigenval ] ) occur either as real or imaginary pairs or as quadruplets in the complex plane . assume that @xmath291 is an eigenvalue of the spectral problem ( [ eq : eigenval ] ) with the eigenvector @xmath292 . then , @xmath293 is an eigenvalue of the same problem with the eigenvector @xmath294 , whereas @xmath295 is also an eigenvalue with the eigenvector @xmath296 . if @xmath83 and @xmath297 ( points 2 and 4 shown on figure [ branches ] ) , theorem [ theorem - critical - point ] implies that the self - adjoint operator @xmath226 in @xmath63 is negative - definite with the exception of either three ( point 2 ) or one ( point 4 ) simple positive eigenvalues . in this case , we can apply the following hamilton krein index theorem in order to characterize the spectrum of @xmath298 . + * hamilton krein index theorem * ( theorem 3.3 in @xcite ) . _ let @xmath299 be a self - adjoint operator in @xmath300 with finitely many negative eigenvalues @xmath301 , a simple zero eigenvalue with eigenfunction @xmath302 , and the rest of its spectrum is bounded from below by a positive number . let @xmath303 be a bounded invertible skew - symmetric operator in @xmath300 . let @xmath304 be a number of positive real eigenvalues of @xmath305 , @xmath306 be a number of quadruplets @xmath307 that are neither in @xmath308 nor in @xmath309 , and @xmath310 be a number of purely imaginary pairs of eigenvalues of @xmath305 whose invariant subspaces lie in the negative subspace of @xmath299 . let @xmath311 be finite and nonzero . then , @xmath312 _ [ theorem - index ] fix @xmath46 , @xmath83 , and @xmath313 , where @xmath139 . for every @xmath237 sufficiently small , @xmath314 for branch ( b ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] and @xmath315 for branch ( c ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] with @xmath316 . for branch ( c ) with @xmath317 , there exists a value @xmath318 such that @xmath319 for @xmath320 and @xmath315 for @xmath321 . if @xmath46 , @xmath83 , @xmath241 , and @xmath237 is sufficiently small , theorem [ theorem - critical - point ] implies that the spectrum of @xmath226 in @xmath63 has finitely many positive eigenvalues and a simple zero eigenvalue with eigenvector @xmath238 . therefore , the hamilton krein index theorem is applied in @xmath63 for @xmath322 , @xmath323 , and @xmath324 . we shall verify that @xmath325 where @xmath238 is given by ( [ kernel ] ) and @xmath326 denotes derivative of @xmath222 with respect to parameter @xmath6 . the first equation @xmath327 follows by theorem [ theorem - critical - point ] . by differentiating equations ( [ eq : state ] ) in @xmath6 , we obtain @xmath328 for every @xmath6 , for which the solution @xmath222 is differentiable in @xmath6 . for @xmath77 , the limiting solution of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] is differentiable in @xmath6 for every @xmath72 and @xmath138 . due to smoothness of the continuation in @xmath38 by theorem [ theorem - critical - point ] , this property holds for every @xmath237 sufficiently small . by using ( [ generalized - kernel - lemma ] ) with @xmath329 , we obtain @xmath330 where we have used the definition of @xmath62 in ( [ charge - pt - dnls ] ) . we compute the slope condition at @xmath77 : @xmath331,\ ] ] where relations ( [ parameterization - a ] ) and ( [ branch - e - a ] ) have been used . for branch ( b ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] with @xmath83 , we have @xmath332 and @xmath333 , so that @xmath334 . by continuity , @xmath335 remains strictly positive for small @xmath237 . thus , @xmath336 and @xmath314 by the hamilton krein index theorem . for branch ( c ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] with @xmath83 , we have @xmath337 and @xmath338 . therefore , we only need to inspect the sign of the expression @xmath339 . if @xmath316 , then for every @xmath340 , we have @xmath341 therefore , @xmath336 and @xmath315 by the hamilton krein index theorem . on the other hand , if @xmath342 , we have @xmath343 at @xmath92 ( @xmath344 ) and @xmath345 at @xmath116 ( @xmath4 ) . since the dependence of @xmath5 versus @xmath6 is monotonic , there exists a value @xmath318 such that @xmath319 for @xmath320 and @xmath315 for @xmath321 . if @xmath315 and @xmath346 , orbital stability of a critical point of @xmath219 in space @xmath63 can be proved from the hamilton krein theorem ( see @xcite and references therein ) . orbital stability of breathers is understood in the following sense . we say that the breather solution ( [ stationary ] ) is orbitally stable in @xmath63 if for every @xmath347 sufficiently small , there exists @xmath348 such that if @xmath349 satisfies @xmath350 , then the unique global solution @xmath351 , @xmath352 to the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) satisfies the bound @xmath353 [ def - stability ] the definition of instability of breathers is given by negating definition [ def - stability ] . the following result gives orbital stability or instability for branch ( c ) shown on figure [ branches ] . [ theorem - bounded ] fix @xmath46 , @xmath83 , and @xmath313 . for every @xmath237 sufficiently small , the breather @xmath66 for branch ( c ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] is orbitally stable in @xmath63 if @xmath316 . for every @xmath317 , there exists a value @xmath318 such that the breather @xmath66 is orbitally stable in @xmath63 if @xmath321 and unstable if @xmath320 . the theorem is a corollary of lemma [ theorem - index ] for branch ( c ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] and the orbital stability theory from @xcite . orbital stability of breathers for branches ( a ) and ( b ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] does not follow from the standard theory because @xmath354 for @xmath240 and @xmath355 for branch ( b ) with @xmath241 . nevertheless , by using smallness of parameter @xmath38 and the construction of the breather @xmath66 in theorem [ theorem - existence - soliton ] , spectral stability of breathers can be considered directly . spectral stability and instability of breathers is understood in the following sense . [ def - spectral ] we say that the breather solution ( [ stationary ] ) is spectrally stable if @xmath356 for every bounded solution of the spectral problem ( [ eq : eigenval ] ) . on the other hand , if the spectral problem ( [ eq : eigenval ] ) admits an eigenvalue @xmath357 with an eigenvector in @xmath358 , we say that the breather solution ( [ stationary ] ) is spectrally unstable . the following theorem gives spectral stability of breathers for branches ( a ) and ( b ) shown on figure [ branches ] . [ theorem - stability ] fix @xmath46 , @xmath93 , and @xmath6 along branches ( a ) and ( b ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] with @xmath72 and @xmath138 . for every @xmath237 sufficiently small , the spectral problem ( [ eq : eigenval ] ) admits a double zero eigenvalue with the generalized eigenvectors @xmath359 where the eigenvector @xmath238 is given by ( [ kernel ] ) and the generalized eigenvector @xmath326 denotes derivative of @xmath222 with respect to parameter @xmath6 . for every @xmath6 such that the following non - degeneracy condition is satisfied , @xmath360 the breather @xmath66 is spectrally stable . if @xmath77 , the breather solution of theorem [ theorem - existence - soliton ] is given by @xmath243 for every @xmath244 and @xmath86 , where @xmath5 and @xmath90 are defined by lemma [ lemma - dimer ] . in this case , the spectral problem ( [ spectral - problem ] ) decouples into @xmath246-by-@xmath246 blocks for each lattice node @xmath30 . recall that @xmath361 at @xmath77 . for @xmath45 , eigenvalues @xmath284 are determined by the @xmath246-by-@xmath246 matrix block @xmath362 . using relations ( [ parameterization - a ] ) and ( [ branch - e - a ] ) , as well as symbolic computations with maple , we found that the @xmath246-by-@xmath246 matrix block @xmath362 has a double zero eigenvalue and a pair of simple eigenvalues at @xmath363 , where @xmath364 for @xmath265 , eigenvalues @xmath284 are determined by the @xmath246-by-@xmath246 matrix block @xmath365 , where @xmath233 is given by ( [ block - l - n ] ) . if @xmath216 , @xmath72 , and @xmath138 , where @xmath85 , each block has four simple eigenvalues @xmath366 and @xmath367 , where @xmath368 so that @xmath369 . since there are infinitely many nodes with @xmath244 , the four eigenvalues are semi - simple and have infinite multiplicity . if @xmath237 is sufficiently small , we use perturbation theory for linear operators from section [ variational ] . * the double zero eigenvalue persists with respect to @xmath158 at zero because of the gauge invariance of the breather @xmath66 ( with respect to rotation of the complex phase ) . indeed , @xmath327 follows from the result of theorem [ theorem - critical - point ] . the generalized eigenvector is defined by equation @xmath370 , which is equivalent to equation @xmath371 . differentiating equations ( [ eq : state ] ) in @xmath6 , we obtain @xmath372 . since @xmath373 = 1 $ ] and @xmath374 the second generalized eigenvector @xmath375 exists as a solution of equation @xmath376 if and only if @xmath377 . it follows from the explicit computation ( [ slope - explicit ] ) that if @xmath77 , then @xmath378 for every @xmath6 along branches ( a ) and ( b ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] . by continuity , @xmath378 for small @xmath237 . therefore , the zero eigenvalue of the operator @xmath379 is exactly double for small @xmath237 . * using the same computation ( [ slope - explicit ] ) , it is clear that @xmath380 for every @xmath6 along branches ( a ) and ( b ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] . assume that @xmath381 and @xmath382 , which is expressed by the non - degeneracy condition ( [ assumption - non - degeneracy ] ) . then , the pair @xmath383 is isolated from the rest of the spectrum of the operator @xmath379 at @xmath77 . since the eigenvalues @xmath363 are simple and purely imaginary , they persist on the imaginary axis for @xmath158 because they can not leave the imaginary axis by the hamiltonian symmetry of proposition [ prop - ham - sym ] . * if @xmath216 , @xmath72 , and @xmath138 , the semi - simple eigenvalues @xmath366 and @xmath367 of infinite multiplicity are nonzero and located at the imaginary axis at different points for @xmath77 . they persist on the imaginary axis for @xmath158 according to the following perturbation argument . first , for the central site @xmath45 , the spectral problem ( [ spectral - problem ] ) can be written in the following abstract form @xmath384 where @xmath385 denotes a continuation of @xmath248 in @xmath38 . thanks to the non - degeneracy condition ( [ assumption - non - degeneracy ] ) as well as the condition @xmath157 , the matrix @xmath386 is invertible . by continuity , the matrix @xmath387 is invertible for every @xmath38 and @xmath284 near @xmath77 and @xmath388 . therefore , there is a unique @xmath389 given by @xmath390 which satisfies @xmath391 near @xmath77 and @xmath388 , where @xmath10 is a positive @xmath38- and @xmath284-independent constant . next , for either @xmath164 or @xmath165 , the spectral problem ( [ spectral - problem ] ) can be represented in the form @xmath392 where @xmath393 denotes a continuation of @xmath233 given by ( [ block - l - n ] ) in @xmath38 , whereas the operator @xmath231 is applied with zero end - point condition at @xmath45 . we have @xmath394 and @xmath395 near @xmath77 and @xmath388 . therefore , up to the first order of the perturbation theory , the spectral parameter @xmath284 near @xmath396 is defined from the truncated eigenvalue problem @xmath397 which is solved with the discrete fourier transform ( [ discrete - fourier ] ) . in order to satisfy the dirichlet end - point condition at @xmath45 , the sine fourier transform must be used , which does not affect the characteristic equation for the purely continuous spectrum of the spectral problem ( [ truncated - problem ] ) . by means of routine computations , we obtain the characteristic equation in the form , see also equation ( [ dispersion - relation ] ) , @xmath398 where @xmath211 $ ] is the parameter of the discrete fourier transform ( [ discrete - fourier ] ) . solving the characteristic equation ( [ continuous - spectrum ] ) , we obtain four branches of the continuous spectrum @xmath399 where the two sign choices are independent from each other . if @xmath93 is fixed and @xmath237 is small , the four branches of the continuous spectrum are located on the imaginary axis near the points @xmath366 and @xmath367 given by ( [ lambda - plus - minus - eig ] ) . + in addition to the continuous spectrum given by ( [ continuous - spectrum ] ) , there may exist isolated eigenvalues near @xmath366 and @xmath367 , which are found from the second - order perturbation theory @xcite . under the condition @xmath72 and @xmath138 , these eigenvalues are purely imaginary . therefore , the infinite - dimensional part of the spectrum of the operator @xmath400 persists on the imaginary axis for @xmath158 near the points @xmath366 and @xmath367 of infinite algebraic multiplicity . the statement of the lemma follows from the perturbation theory and the fact that all isolated eigenvalues and the continuous spectrum of @xmath401 are purely imaginary . in the asymptotic limit @xmath197 as @xmath198 , the eigenvalues @xmath402 and @xmath396 defined by ( [ lambda-0-eig ] ) and ( [ lambda - plus - minus - eig ] ) are given asymptotically by @xmath403 where the remainder terms are @xmath277 as @xmath278 . the values @xmath402 , @xmath404 , and @xmath405 are close to each other as @xmath406 . computations in the proof of theorem [ theorem - stability ] can be extended to the branch ( c ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] . indeed , @xmath380 for branch ( c ) with either @xmath316 or @xmath317 , and @xmath6 near @xmath407 . on the other hand , @xmath408 if @xmath317 and @xmath6 near @xmath409 . as a result , branch ( c ) is spectrally stable in the former case and is spectrally unstable in the latter case , in agreement with theorem [ theorem - bounded ] . observe in the proof of theorem [ theorem - stability ] that @xmath410 if @xmath95 . in this case , branch ( b ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] is spectrally unstable . this instability corresponds to the instability of the zero equilibrium for @xmath95 , in agreement with the result of proposition [ prop - zero - equilibrium ] . before presenting numerical approximations of eigenvalues of the spectral problem ( [ eq : eigenval ] ) , we compute the krein signature of wave continuum . this helps to interpret instabilities and resonances that arise when isolated eigenvalues @xmath383 cross the continuous bands near points @xmath366 and @xmath367 . the krein signature of simple isolated eigenvalues is defined as follows . [ def - krein ] let @xmath411 be an eigenvector of the spectral problem ( [ eq : eigenval ] ) for an isolated simple eigenvalue @xmath380 . then , the energy quadratic form @xmath412 is nonzero and its sign is called the krein signature of the eigenvalue @xmath402 . definition [ def - krein ] is used to simplify the presentation . similarly , one can define the krein signature of isolated multiple eigenvalues and the krein signature of the continuous spectral bands in the spectral problem ( [ eq : eigenval ] ) @xcite . the following lemma characterizes krein signatures of the spectral points arising in the proof of theorem [ theorem - stability ] . [ lemma - krein ] fix @xmath46 , @xmath93 , and @xmath413 with @xmath138 . assume the non - degeneracy condition ( [ assumption - non - degeneracy ] ) . for every @xmath237 sufficiently small , we have the following for the corresponding branches of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] : * the subspaces of @xmath379 in @xmath63 near @xmath366 , @xmath367 , and @xmath383 have positive , negative , and positive krein signature , respectively ; * the subspaces of @xmath379 in @xmath63 near @xmath366 , @xmath367 , and @xmath383 have negative , positive ( if @xmath414 ) or negative ( if @xmath415 ) , and positive krein signature , respectively ; * all subspaces of @xmath379 in @xmath63 near @xmath366 , @xmath367 , and @xmath383 ( if @xmath380 ) have negative krein signature . we proceed by the perturbation arguments from the limit @xmath77 , where @xmath416 is a block - diagonal operator consisting of @xmath417 blocks . in particular , we consider the blocks for @xmath265 , where @xmath233 is given by ( [ block - l - n ] ) . solving ( [ spectral - problem ] ) at @xmath77 and @xmath388 , we obtain the eigenvector @xmath418 as a result , we obtain for the eigenvector @xmath419 , @xmath420 for branch ( a ) , @xmath79 and @xmath414 . therefore , @xmath421 for @xmath422 and @xmath423 for @xmath424 . for branch ( b ) , @xmath83 and either @xmath414 or @xmath425 . in either case , @xmath423 for @xmath422 . on the other hand , for @xmath424 , @xmath421 if @xmath414 and @xmath423 if @xmath425 . for branch ( c ) , @xmath83 and @xmath425 . in this case , @xmath423 for either @xmath422 or @xmath424 . finally , the krein signature for the eigenvalue @xmath426 denoted by @xmath427 follows from the computations of eigenvalues @xmath274 in the proof of theorem [ theorem - critical - point ] . we have @xmath428 for branches ( a ) and ( b ) because @xmath429 and we have @xmath430 for branch ( c ) because @xmath431 , whereas the eigenvalue @xmath263 is controlled by the result of lemma [ theorem - index ] . the signs of all eigenvalues are nonzero and continuous with respect to parameter @xmath38 . therefore , the count above extends to the case of small nonzero @xmath38 . the spectrum of @xmath401 is shown at figure [ spectra ] . panels ( a ) , ( b ) and ( c ) correspond to branches shown at figure [ branches ] . for different branches of breathers . ] * we can see on panel ( a ) of figure [ spectra ] that @xmath432 do not intersect for every @xmath414 and are located within fixed distance @xmath277 , as @xmath433 . note that the upper - most @xmath402 and @xmath404 have positive krein signature , whereas the lowest @xmath405 has negative krein signature , as is given by lemma [ lemma - krein ] . * we observe on panel ( b ) of figure [ spectra ] that @xmath434 intersects @xmath402 , creating a small bubble of instability in the spectrum . the insert shows that the bubble shrinks as @xmath435 , in agreement with theorem [ theorem - stability ] . there is also an intersection between @xmath436 and @xmath402 , which does not create instability . these results are explained by the krein signature computations in lemma [ lemma - krein ] . instability is induced by opposite krein signatures between @xmath404 and @xmath402 , whereas crossing of @xmath405 and @xmath402 with the same krein signatures is safe of instabilities . note that for small @xmath6 , the isolated eigenvalue @xmath402 is located above both the spectral bands near @xmath404 and @xmath405 . the gap in the numerical data near @xmath344 indicates failure to continue the breather solution numerically in @xmath38 , in agreement with the proof of theorem [ theorem - existence - soliton ] . * we observe from panel ( c ) of figure [ spectra ] that @xmath402 and @xmath437 intersect but do not create instabilities , since all parts of the spectrum have the same signature , as is given by lemma [ lemma - krein ] . in fact , the branch is both spectrally and orbitally stable as long as @xmath380 , in agreement with theorem [ theorem - bounded ] . on the other hand , there is @xmath318 , if @xmath317 , such that @xmath408 for @xmath438 , which indicates instability of branch ( c ) , again , in agreement with theorem [ theorem - bounded ] . as we see on panel ( b ) of figure [ spectra ] , @xmath402 intersects @xmath404 for some @xmath439 . in the remainder of this section , we study whether this crossing point is always located on the right of @xmath440 . in fact , the answer to this question is negative . we shall prove for branch ( b ) that the intersection of @xmath402 with either @xmath404 or @xmath441 occur either for @xmath442 or for @xmath443 , depending on parameters @xmath39 and @xmath37 . fix @xmath46 , @xmath83 , and @xmath413 along branch ( b ) of lemma [ lemma - dimer ] . there exists a resonance @xmath444 at @xmath445 with @xmath446 if @xmath447 and @xmath448 if @xmath449 , where @xmath450 moreover , if @xmath451 , there exists a resonance @xmath452 at @xmath445 with @xmath448 . let us first assume that there exists a resonance @xmath444 at @xmath453 and find the condition on @xmath39 and @xmath37 , when this is possible . from the definitions ( [ lambda-0-eig ] ) and ( [ lambda - plus - minus - eig ] ) , we obtain the constraint on @xmath181 : @xmath454 after canceling @xmath455 since @xmath456 with @xmath185 given by ( [ a - plus ] ) , we obtain @xmath457 which has two roots @xmath458 since @xmath103 , the lower sign is impossible because this leads to a contradiction @xmath459 the upper sign is possible if @xmath460 . using the parametrization , we substitute the root for @xmath181 to the equation @xmath461 and simplify it : @xmath462 \\ & = & \frac{2 \sqrt{\omega^2 - 4 \gamma^2 } \left(2 |\omega| + \sqrt{\omega^2 - 4 \gamma^2}\right)^2}{\left(|\omega| + \sqrt{\omega^2 - 4 \gamma^2}\right)}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this equation further simplifies to the form : @xmath463 squaring it up , we obtain @xmath464 which has only one positive root for @xmath465 given by @xmath466 this root yields a formula for @xmath467 in ( [ omega - star ] ) . since there is a unique value for @xmath468 , for which the case @xmath469 is possible , we shall now consider whether @xmath446 or @xmath470 for @xmath471 or @xmath447 . to inspect the range @xmath470 , we consider a particular case , for which the intersection @xmath472 happens at @xmath4 . in this case , @xmath473 given by ( [ a - plus ] ) , so that the condition @xmath474 can be rewritten as @xmath475 there is only one negative root for @xmath37 and it is given by @xmath476 . by continuity , we conclude that @xmath444 for @xmath477 and @xmath452 for @xmath478 , both cases correspond to @xmath448 . finally , we verify that the case @xmath444 occurs for @xmath446 if @xmath447 . indeed , @xmath479 and @xmath480 as @xmath198 , so that @xmath481 as @xmath482 . on the other hand , the previous estimates suggest that @xmath483 for every @xmath425 if @xmath447 . therefore , there exists at least one intersection @xmath444 for @xmath446 if @xmath447 . we have reduced newton s equation of motion for coupled pendula shown on figure [ pendulapic ] under a resonant periodic force to the @xmath0-symmetric dnls equation ( [ pt - dnls ] ) . we have shown that this system is hamiltonian with conserved energy ( [ energy - pt - dnls ] ) and an additional constant of motion ( [ charge - pt - dnls ] ) . we have studied breather solutions of this model , which generalize symmetric synchronized oscillations of coupled pendula that arise if @xmath4 . we showed existence of three branches of breathers shown on figure [ branches ] . we also investigated their spectral stability analytically and numerically . the spectral information on each branch of solutions is shown on figure [ spectra ] . for branch ( c ) , we were also able to prove orbital stability and instability from the energy method . the technical results of this paper are summarized in table 1 and described as follows . for branch ( a ) , we found that it is disconnected from the symmetric synchronized oscillations at @xmath4 . along this branch , breathers of small amplitudes @xmath5 are connected to breathers of large amplitudes @xmath5 . every point on the branch corresponds to the saddle point of the energy function between two wave continua of positive and negative energies . every breather along the branch is spectrally stable and is free of resonance between isolated eigenvalues and continuous spectrum . in the follow - up work @xcite , we will prove long - time orbital stability of breathers along this branch . for branch ( b ) , we found that the large - amplitude breathers as @xmath482 are connected to the symmetric synchronized oscillations at @xmath4 , which have the smallest ( but nonzero ) amplitude @xmath119 . breathers along the branch are spectrally stable except for a narrow instability bubble , where the isolated eigenvalue @xmath402 is in resonance with the continuous spectrum . the instability bubble can occur either for @xmath414 , where the breather is a saddle point of the energy function between two wave continua of opposite energies or for @xmath415 , where the breather is a saddle point between the two negative - definite wave continua and directions of positive energy . when the isolated eigenvalue of positive energy @xmath402 is above the continuous spectrum near @xmath404 and @xmath367 , orbital stability of breathers can be proved by using the technique in @xcite , which was developed for the dnls equation . finally , for branch ( c ) , we found that the small - amplitude breathers at @xmath484 are connected to the symmetric synchronized oscillations at @xmath4 , which have the largest amplitude @xmath116 . breathers are either spectrally stable near @xmath344 or unstable near @xmath4 , depending on the detuning frequency @xmath37 and the amplitude of the periodic resonant force @xmath39 . when breathers are spectrally stable , they are also orbitally stable for infinitely long times . * acknowledgements . * the authors thank i.v . barashenkov and p.g . kevrekidis for useful discussions regarding this project . the work of a.c . is supported by the graduate scholarship at mcmaster university . the work of d.p . is supported by the ministry of education and science of russian federation ( the base part of the state task no . 2014/133 , project no . 2839 ) . c. huygens , _ the pendulum clock or geometrical demonstrations concerning the motion of pendula as applied to clocks _ , iowa state university press series in the history of technology and science ( iowa state university press , ames , ia , 1986 ) . mohamed , m.a . rahman and r. seethapathy , _ robust line - voltage sensorless control and synchronization of lcl - filtered distributed generation inverters for high power quality grid connection _ , power electronics , ieee transactions * 27 * , 87 ( 2012 ) . Abstract:
[ "we derive a hamiltonian version of the @xmath0-symmetric discrete nonlinear schrdinger equation that describes synchronized dynamics of coupled pendula driven by a periodic movement of their common strings . in the limit of weak coupling between the pendula , we classify the existence and spectral stability of breathers ( time - periodic solutions localized in the lattice ) supported near one pair of coupled pendula . orbital stability or instability of breathers is proved in a subset of the existence region ." ]
12,134
12,134
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the single - impurity kondo model @xcite is unquestionably one of the most important models studied in condensed matter physics over the past decades . the investigation of its equilibrium properties has caused the development of important theoretical tools such as renormalization group methods or the bethe ansatz for impurity systems @xcite . more than 20 years ago it was also realized @xcite that the kondo model can be used to describe transport experiments through quantum dots . the developments in the ability to engineer devices on the nanoscale has led to the experimental realization of kondo physics in such systems @xcite . one particular advantage of these quantum dots is the almost full control over system parameters like temperature , bias and gate voltages , magnetic field , and exchange couplings . these possibilities have triggered a great interest in the theoretical study of quantum dots out of equilibrium . a wide range of theoretical methods has been applied in the past , including non - equilibrium perturbation theory @xcite , the flow - equation method @xcite , coulomb gas representations @xcite , real - time and functional renormalization group methods @xcite , a non - equilibrium extension of the numerical renormalization group ( nrg ) method @xcite , and time - dependent density matrix renormalization group ( dmrg ) techniques @xcite . these studies established the importance of relaxation and decoherence effects for the understanding of non - equilibrium physics . from an experimental point of view various measurable quantities like the steady - state current , the magnetization , and the static susceptibility have been calculated . beside the application of these techniques there were also attempts to employ the known integrability of certain impurity models in equilibrium , notably the anderson impurity model and the interacting resonant level model , to investigate their non - equilibrium properties . konik et al . @xcite calculated the differential conductance in the anderson impurity model by combining the well - known scattering states of the equilibrium system @xcite with a landauer - bttiker formalism . in this work the chemical potentials in the leads were coupled to dressed excitations rather than free electrons and the calculation was restricted to a subset of the excitations . in contrast , a different approach was recently put forward by metha and andrei @xcite to treat the interacting resonant level model . they constructed a new set of scattering states of bethe - ansatz form which share the quantum numbers of free electrons in the incoming channel , hence allowing the application of a finite voltage in the usual manner . however , questions concerning the existence of these scattering states and issues related to the used regularization scheme of the theory remain open . nevertheless , the interacting resonant level model has become one of the benchmark systems in the study of non - equilibrium physics @xcite . despite the large number of studies of impurity models out of equilibrium only few results are known for the dynamical correlation functions . the spin dynamics of a non - equilibrium quantum dot has been studied by using a majorana fermion representation @xcite , which yields the qualitative low - frequency properties of the correlation functions . the transverse susceptibility in a kondo model was studied by paaske et al . @xcite using non - equilibrium perturbation theory together with a pseudo - fermion representation of the kondo spin . they showed that the fourier transform of the transverse susceptibility possesses a peak if its frequency equals the value of the applied magnetic field , @xmath6 , and that the width of this peak is given by the transverse spin relaxation rate @xmath7 . their derivation was , however , restricted to either the regime @xmath8 or @xmath9 , where @xmath0 denotes the applied voltage . very recently , fritsch and kehrein @xcite applied the flow - equation method to study the longitudinal correlation function as well as the magnetization and t - matrix in a kondo model in and out of equilibrium . the numerical solution of the two - loop scaling equations allowed them to study the correlation function for all combinations of the parameters voltage , temperature , and magnetic field , provided the weak - coupling condition ( i.e. the presence of a large enough infrared cutoff ) was satisfied . in particular , these numerical solutions were used to compare the effects of an applied voltage and a finite temperature , revealing qualitative differences such as the appearance of kondo splitting in the non - equilibrium situation . in general , however , this method can not provide analytic expressions for the line shape . in this article we will generalize the real - time renormalization group method in frequency space @xcite to allow the calculation of dynamical correlation functions of arbitrary dot operators in systems describing spin and/or orbital fluctuations . in this setting the quantum dot is coupled to non - interacting leads which are held at different chemical potentials . the derived two - loop rg equations can be solved analytically in the weak - coupling regime . explicitly , we calculate the longitudinal and transverse spin - spin correlation and response functions in a two - lead kondo model in a magnetic field @xmath1 up to order @xmath10 . here @xmath11 denotes the effective coupling at the energy scale @xmath12 where the flow of the coupling constant is cut - off . in order to satisfy the weak - coupling condition @xmath13 either the applied voltage or the magnetic field have to be sufficiently large compared to the kondo temperature , @xmath14 , where @xmath3 is the scale where the system enters the strong - coupling regime . we note that the applied formalism does not rely on a fermionic representation of the kondo spin but rather deals with its matrix representation in liouville space directly . the longitudinal response function possesses a peak at the spin relaxation rate @xmath15 , which gets suppressed in a finite magnetic field . interestingly , in the case of a strong magnetic field , @xmath16 where @xmath17 denotes the renormalized magnetic field ( see eq . for the precise value ) , the longitudinal correlation and response function show `` kink - like '' structures at the frequencies @xmath18 , which were also observed using the flow - equation method @xcite . here we additionally provide the line shape close to these `` kinks '' and show that the real part of the response functions shows characteristic logarithmic features at @xmath18 . furthermore we study the longitudinal and transverse fluctuation - dissipation ratios . as expected these ratios show a revival of the fluctuation - dissipation theorem @xcite provided the applied voltage is small compared to the magnetic field or the considered oscillation frequency . this article is organized as follows . in the next two sections we will define the general set up we want to study and define the used notations . this will include the kondo model , the notion of liouville operators as well as the definition of the symmetrized correlation function and susceptibility . in sec . [ sec : pe ] we will then derive perturbative expansions for the kernels needed to calculate these correlation functions . this will be performed in liouville space ; the expansion is done in powers of the exchange coupling between the dot and the reservoirs . these perturbative expansions can be applied to any model describing spin and/or orbital fluctuations as well as correlation functions of arbitrary operators . in sec . [ sec : genrg ] we will use these results to derive the rg equations for the kernels of pure dot operators . in the following section we will further specialize to the two - lead kondo model , where we use the explicit expressions of the liouville operator and the coupling between the dot and the reservoirs to derive analytic results for the effective kernels appearing in the correlation functions . finally , these expressions for the kernels are used in secs . [ sec : cf ] and [ sec : tcf ] to calculate the longitudinal and transverse correlation and response functions . the real - time renormalization group in frequency space was applied in ref . to calculate various quantities including the spin relaxation and dephasing rates , the renormalized magnetic field , the magnetization and the current in the anisotropic kondo model in a finite magnetic field out of equilibrium . in this reference all notations which we will use in the following were originally set up . in order to increase the readability of the present manuscript we will briefly recall the basic formulas and notations . we consider a quantum dot with fixed charge in the coulomb blockade regime coupled to external reservoirs . as shown in detail in ref . , a standard schrieffer - wolff transformation leads to a hamiltonian of the form @xmath19 where @xmath20 is the reservoir part , @xmath21 characterizes the isolated quantum dot , and @xmath0 describes the coupling between reservoirs and quantum dot . they are given explicitly by @xmath22 here , @xmath23 are the fermionic creation ( @xmath24 ) and annihilation ( @xmath25 ) operators in the reservoirs and @xmath26 is an index characterizing all quantum numbers of the reservoir states , which contains the reservoir index @xmath27 and the spin quantum number @xmath28 . we measure the energy @xmath29 of the reservoir states relative to the chemical potential @xmath30 of reservoir @xmath31 . the eigenstates and eigenenergies of the isolated quantum dot are denoted by @xmath32 and @xmath33 . the interaction @xmath0 is quadratic in the reservoir field operators , which arises from second order processes of one electron hopping on and off the quantum dot coherently . this keeps the charge fixed and allows only spin / orbital fluctuations . the coupling vertex @xmath34 is an arbitrary operator acting on the dot states . it is written in its most general form , depending on the quantum numbers and energies of the reservoir states in an arbitrary way . as explained in ref . , the rg approach can be set up in its most convenient form if one assumes that the frequency dependence of the initial vertices is rather weak and varies on the scale of the band width @xmath35 of the reservoirs . for the model we have in mind , the isotropic spin-@xmath36 kondo model in a magnetic field , this is certainly satisfied . therefore , we will assume this in the following and introduce below [ see eq . ( [ contraction ] ) ] a convenient cutoff function into the free reservoir green s functions . to achieve a more compact notation for all indices , we write @xmath37 and sum ( integrate ) implicitly over all indices ( frequencies ) . the interaction is then written in the compact form @xmath38 @xmath39 denotes normal - ordering of the reservoir field operators , meaning that no contraction is allowed between reservoir field operators within the normal - ordering . within the normal - ordering of eq . ( [ spin_orbital ] ) , the field operators can be arranged in an arbitrary way ( up to a fermionic sign ) , therefore the coupling vertex can always be chosen such that antisymmetry holds : @xmath40 furthermore , due to the hermiticity of @xmath0 , the vertex has the property @xmath41 where @xmath42 . and @xmath43 involve exchange between the electron spins of the left / right reservoir and the local spin , @xmath44 transfers an electron from one reservoir to the other during the exchange process . we assume that the kondo model was derived from an anderson impurity model via a schrieffer - wolff transformation , which implies the relation @xmath45 . ] the specific model we want to study is the isotropic kondo model in an external magnetic field @xmath46 ( see fig . [ fig : kondomodel ] ) . in this case the above relations read explicitly @xmath47 -(j_{\alpha'\alpha})_0 s^i\sigma^i_{\sigma'\sigma } & \text{for $ \eta=-\eta'=-$ } \end{array } \right.\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath48 , @xmath49 is the @xmath50-component of the spin-@xmath36 operator of the quantum dot , @xmath51 is a pauli matrix , and @xmath52 are the initial exchange couplings . we will be interested in the antiferromagnetic model here , i.e. , we assume @xmath53 initially . if one derives the kondo model via a schrieffer - wolff transformation from an anderson impurity model ( see , e.g. , ref . ) , one further finds @xmath54 although the general formalism and many of the following formulas are also valid for an arbitrary number of reservoirs , we will consider the case of two reservoirs only with chemical potentials given by @xmath55 where @xmath0 is the applied voltage which we assume to be positive , @xmath56 . a contraction is defined with respect to a grand - canonical distribution of the reservoirs , given by @xmath57 @xmath58 is the fermi distribution function corresponding to temperature @xmath59 ( note that the chemical potential does not enter this formula since @xmath29 is measured relative to @xmath30 ) . furthermore , @xmath60 is the @xmath61-function in compact notation . furthermore , we have introduced the cutoff by the band width @xmath35 into the reservoir contraction via the density of states @xmath62 in order to calculate the dynamical spin - spin correlation functions we have to know the time evolution of the density matrix @xmath63 . formally , this follows from the solution of the von neumann equation @xmath64 where @xmath65}_-,\ ] ] is the liouvillian acting on usual operators in hilbert space via the commutator . the form of the hamiltonian yields a similar decomposition of the liouvillian , @xmath66 with @xmath67}_-$ ] , @xmath68}_-$ ] , and @xmath69}_-$ ] . we would like to note that the concept of liouville space and superoperators have been used in various contexts , for example in quantum statistical mechanics @xcite . initially , we assume that the density matrix is a product of an arbitrary dot part @xmath70 and a grandcanonical distribution @xmath71 for the reservoirs , @xmath72 furthermore , we introduce the laplace transform @xmath73 where we will frequently use the notation @xmath74 . the stationary density matrix is defined as @xmath75 which is understood in the sense @xmath76 for any local operator @xmath77 , and can be calculated using @xmath78 the existence of a stationary state was proven in ref . using non - equilibrium pertubation theory to all orders as well as in ref . using the rtrg - fs , which in particular clarified the generation of the relaxation and dephasing rates under the rg flow . the reduced density matrix of the dot is obtained by tracing out the reservoir degrees of freedom @xmath79 where @xmath80 denotes the effective liouvillian of the quantum dot formally defined in below . the stationary reduced density matrix can then be obtained similar to , @xmath81 the quantities of interest in this article are the two - point correlation function of two operators @xmath82 and @xmath83 as well as their dynamical susceptibility with respect to the steady state , @xmath84}_+\bigr\rangle_{st } , \qquad \label{eq : defphi}\\ \chi_{ab}(t)\!&=&\!{\text{i}}\,\theta(t)\bigl\langle { \left[a(t)_\mathrm{h},b(0)_\mathrm{h}\right]}_-\bigr\rangle_{st}. \label{eq : defchi}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath85 here the trace is taken over the dot states as well as the reservoir degrees of freedom , @xmath86 . the time - evolution of the operators in the heisenberg picture is given by @xmath87 instead of calculating and in real time we will study their respective fourier transforms @xmath88 where @xmath89 for @xmath90 ( @xmath91 ) . the susceptibility admits the standard decomposition @xmath92 . in order to calculate @xmath93 and @xmath94 we introduce the auxiliary correlation functions @xmath95}_\pm\bigr\rangle_{st } \label{eq : defbarcomega}\ ] ] with @xmath96 . its relations to the correlation functions are given by ( see app . [ sec : crel ] ) @xmath97 the static susceptibility is related to the dynamical susceptibility via @xmath98 where @xmath99 denotes the magnetization . some general properties of the correlation functions can be obtained by considering their spectral representations . let @xmath100 be a complete set of basis states of the full hamiltonian @xmath101 , i.e. @xmath102 . furthermore , the stationary density matrix @xmath103 satisfies @xmath104}_-=0 $ ] , thus the basis states @xmath105 can be chosen such that @xmath106 using this one easily verifies the spectral representations @xmath107 these relations imply @xmath108 as well as @xmath109 , @xmath110 , and @xmath111 . in equilibrium the matrix elements of the density matrix are given by @xmath112 with the partition sum @xmath113 , which implies the well - known fluctuation - dissipation theorem @xcite @xmath114 as well as @xmath115 . in this section we derive a perturbative expansion in liouville space for the auxiliary correlation functions @xmath116 , which will serve as the starting point for the derivation of the rg equations below . a similar perturbative expansion for the effective liouvillian of the quantum dot @xmath117 has been derived in refs . . we will generalize these results to @xmath116 while closely following the presentation of ref . . as starting point to set up the formalism we assume that the operators @xmath82 and @xmath118 admit a representation similar to , @xmath119 where we recall the short - hand notation @xmath120 and sum ( integrate ) implicitly over all indices ( frequencies ) . we further assume the operators @xmath82 and @xmath118 to be bosonic which implies @xmath121 and @xmath122 to be even . eventually we will be concerned with the correlation functions of the spin operators on the dot , i.e. @xmath123 . in this case the operators do not couple dot and reservoir degrees of freedom and hence only the terms with @xmath124 are non - vanishing . however , we will keep the general forms throughout this section , which for example include the case of current operators @xcite where @xmath125 . in order to set up the perturbative expansions in liouville space we define the operators @xmath126}_+,\quad l_b^\pm={\text{i}}{\left[b,.\right]}_\pm.\ ] ] then using together with we obtain after some algebra @xmath127 in the next step we use and and furthermore perform the laplace transform @xmath128 in to obtain @xmath129 here we have used @xmath96 to ensure convergence of the integral . the limit @xmath130 has to be taken before @xmath131 in order to reach the stationary state . the next step is to expand the expression in the interacting part @xmath132 of the liouvillian and to integrate out the reservoir part . this procedure was outlined for the reduced density matrix @xmath133 in detail in ref . ; we will generalize this to the case of the auxiliary correlation functions here . first , using @xmath134 with @xmath135 , can be formally expanded in @xmath132 , @xmath136 . \label{eq : cab3 } \end{split}\ ] ] second , in order to integrate out the reservoir degrees of freedom we write @xmath132 in the form @xmath137 where we implicitly sum ( integrate ) over @xmath138 as well as @xmath139 . @xmath140 is a quantum field superoperator in liouville space for the reservoirs , defined by ( @xmath141 is an arbitrary reservoir operator ) @xmath142 here @xmath143 serves as an auxiliary index which is similar to the keldysh index indicating whether the field operator is acting on the upper or the lower part of the keldysh contour . @xmath144 is a superoperator acting in liouville space of the quantum dot , and is defined by ( @xmath141 is an arbitrary operator on the quantum dot ) @xmath145 in the same way we define @xmath146 where the dot superoperators @xmath147 and @xmath148 act on arbitrary dot operators @xmath141 as @xmath149 for @xmath150 or @xmath151 we define @xmath152}_+$ ] and @xmath153}_\pm$ ] , respectively . as we consider only bosonic operators @xmath82 and @xmath118 which change the number of fermions by an even integer , the sign - superoperator is given by @xmath154 this operator was introduced to compensate additional signs due to interchanges of fermionic reservoir field operators as explained in detail in ref . . inserting the representations ( [ coupling_product ] ) as well as and into and shifting all reservoir field superoperators @xmath155 to the right using @xmath156 where we have introduced the short - hand notation @xmath157 , one can show@xcite that each term of perturbation theory can be written as a product of a dot part and an average over a sequence of field superoperators of the reservoirs with respect to @xmath71 . evaluating the latter with the help of wick s theorem , one can represent each term of the wick decomposition by a diagram ( see fig . [ fig : diagram_example ] for an example ) describing a certain process contributing to the auxiliary correlation function @xmath116 . each process consists of a sequence of interaction vertices @xmath158 between the dot and the reservoirs , and a free time propagation of the dot in between ( leading to resolvents in laplace space ) . since the reservoirs have been integrated out , the vertices are connected by reservoir contractions ( the green lines in fig . [ fig : diagram_example ] ) . this means that the various diagrams represent terms for the effective time evolution of the dot in the presence of dissipative reservoirs . . the time direction is to the left . each vertex @xmath159 is represented by two adjacent black dots indicating the two reservoir field operators associated with each vertex . the vertices @xmath160 and @xmath161 are represented in the same way by red dots . for this example we have chosen @xmath125 in as it would be the case for a current - current correlation function . the black horizontal lines connecting the vertices denote the free time propagation of the quantum system , leading to the resolvents @xmath162 in laplace space . the green lines are the reservoir contractions arising from the application of wick s theorem . the vertical blue lines between the vertices are auxiliary lines to determine the energy argument @xmath163 of the resolvents . ] each diagram for the auxiliary correlation function has the form @xmath164 where @xmath68}_-$ ] , @xmath165 indicates an interaction vertex , and @xmath166 is a contraction between the reservoir field superoperators , defined by @xmath167 we stress that only the initial reduced density matrix of the dot @xmath70 defined in appears in as we have already performed the trace over the reservoir degrees of freedom ( and hence @xmath71 ) to obtain the reservoir contractions @xmath168 . to factorize the wick decomposition , a fermionic sign has to be assigned to each permutation of reservoir field superoperators , indicated by the sign factor @xmath169 in ( [ value_diagram ] ) . for each pair of vertices connected by two reservoir lines , a combinatorial factor @xmath170 occurs , leading to the prefactor @xmath171 in ( [ value_diagram ] ) . the value of the frequencies @xmath163 in the resolvents between the interaction vertices is determined by the sum over all variables @xmath172 of those indices belonging to the reservoir lines which are crossed by a vertical line at the position of the resolvent ( the blue lines in fig . [ fig : diagram_example ] ) . thereby , the index of the left vertex has to be taken of the corresponding reservoir line . for example , the diagram shown in fig . [ fig : diagram_example ] is given by ( the obvious dependence on the keldysh indices has been omitted for simplicity , i.e. @xmath173 and @xmath174 ) @xmath175 where the resolvents are defined by @xmath176 with @xmath177 as well as @xmath178 as can be seen from the example ( [ diagram_example ] ) , each diagram consists of a sequence of irreducible blocks ( where a vertical line always cuts at least one reservoir line ) and free resolvents @xmath179 or @xmath180 in between . now there are two possibilities : ( i ) the vertices @xmath160 and @xmath161 do not belong to the same block ( see fig . [ fig : block1example ] for an example ) . ( ii ) the vertices @xmath160 and @xmath161 belong to the same block ( see fig . [ fig : block2example ] for an example ) . in the first case ( i ) one can formally resum those terms between the vertices @xmath160 and @xmath161 which are not connected to them similar to dyson equations with the result @xmath181 where @xmath182 here the kernel @xmath183 contains the sum over all irreducible diagrams , @xmath184 where the subindex @xmath185 indicates that only irreducible diagrams are allowed where any vertical line between the vertices cuts through at least one reservoir contraction . we further introduce irreducible blocks @xmath186 as well as @xmath187 which are given as the sum over all irreducible diagrams containing the vertices @xmath160 and @xmath188 , @xmath189 obviously , in the case of spin operators , @xmath190 , the vertex @xmath160 has no external legs and hence @xmath191 . in contrast , although the vertex @xmath188 does not possess external legs either , there exist irreducible diagrams containing @xmath188 and at least one vertex @xmath159 to the left and one to the right of @xmath188 . if we now proceed by resumming the irreducible blocks right to ( and not connected to ) the vertex @xmath188 similar to and perform the limit @xmath192 using , we deduce that all terms of type ( i ) contribute to @xmath193 . \label{eq : barcabterm1}\ ] ] in the second case ( ii ) we introduce a kernel similar to and which contains all irreducible diagrams containing both vertices @xmath160 and @xmath161 , @xmath194 in the case of spin operators , @xmath190 , there exist no irreducible diagrams connecting @xmath160 and @xmath188 , hence @xmath195 in this case . now using again for the sum of the irreducible blocks right to ( and not connected to ) the vertex @xmath188 we deduce that all terms of type ( ii ) contribute to @xmath196 . \label{eq : barcabterm2}\ ] ] hence , taking together ( i ) and ( ii ) we finally arrive at the main result of this section , @xmath197\nonumber\\ * & & \!\ ! -{\text{i}}\,\mbox{tr}_s\bigl[\sigma_{ab}^\pm(\omega,{\text{i}}0+)\,\rho_s^{st}\bigr ] , \label{eq : barcresult}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the kernels are defined by , , , and , respectively . in addition we note that the diagrammatic series can be partially resummed by taking all closed sub - diagrams between two fixed vertices together which contain only contractions connecting vertices between the two fixed ones . this has the effect that the resolvents in ( [ value_kernel ] ) , , , and , are replaced by @xmath198 ( and similar for @xmath199 ) , i.e. , the full effective liouville operator occurs in the denominator . in this formulation the number of diagrams is reduced , i.e. diagrams containing closed sub - diagrams between two vertices are no longer allowed . in this section we will set up the generic rg equations for the kernels @xmath186 , @xmath187 , and @xmath200 , for spin operators on the dot in a model with spin / orbital fluctuations . hence we will assume the form for the coupling between the reservoirs and the quantum dot , but will keep the vertex @xmath158 arbitrary at this stage . the derivation will require some relations between the initial liouvillian @xmath201 , the vertex @xmath188 and the effective dot liouvillian @xmath117 which can be explicitly checked for the kondo model to be studied in the next section but have to be assumed here . these relations are , , , and . the generic rg equations for the vertex @xmath159 and the effective liouvillian @xmath117 have been derived and solved in ref . , we will quote these results without derivation when they are needed . furthermore , we will restrict ourselves to the calculation of the dynamical spin - spin correlations only , i.e. we will assume @xmath190 in what follows . this implies in particular , that the initial values of the vertices @xmath160 and @xmath188 defined in and do not possess any external lines , i.e. @xmath124 . explicitly , @xmath202}_+,\label{eq : avertexinitial}\\ \mathcal{b}_\pm&=&{\text{i}}{\left[b,.\right]}_\pm.\label{eq : bvertexinitial}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we will see below that this form of the vertex @xmath160 is conserved under the rg flow . in contrast , a new effective @xmath118-type vertex @xmath203 with two external lines will be generated . the fact that the initial vertex @xmath160 has no external lines directly implies the final results for the kernels and , namely @xmath204 hence , in the following we have to consider the kernel only . we note that the results of this section remain valid for any pure dot operators @xmath82 and @xmath118 , i.e. any operators with @xmath124 . the rg procedure is divided into two steps . in the first step we will integrate out the symmetric part of the reservoir contractions @xmath205 . the reason for this is as follows : the effective dot liouvillian @xmath80 can be diagonalized as @xmath206 where @xmath207 and @xmath208 denote the eigenvalues and corresponding projectors , respectively . this diagonalization implies for the resolvents @xmath209 now there exists a zero eigenvalue @xmath210 whose eigenstate for @xmath211 corresponds to the stationary state . the appearance of this zero eigenvalue can lead to infrared divergencies of the frequency integrations in the perturbative expansions for the vertex @xmath159 and the effective liouvillian @xmath117 as is elaborated on in detail in ref . . however , after the discrete rg step we can trivially sum over the keldysh indices @xmath212 and @xmath213 by introducing @xmath214 in the resulting rg equations only the symmetric vertex @xmath215 will appear . this vertex has the important property @xmath216 which is independent of the model specifics . hence , after the discrete rg step the zero eigenvalue can no longer appear in any resolvent standing left to @xmath215 ( i.e. in no resolvent except the one standing left to the vertex @xmath188 ) . this resolves the problem of infrared divergent internal frequency integrations , as the remaining eigenvalues @xmath207 have a strictly negative imaginary part ( see and ) . we would like to refer to ref . for a general discussion of this topic . in the second step we introduce a cut - off @xmath217 into the reservoir contractions via the fermi function . we then integrate out the reservoirs by sending @xmath218 , which results in a description of the system in terms of effective dot quantities like @xmath117 . this second , continuous , rg step is further divided into two substeps , first we integrate out the reservoir degrees of freedom down to an energy scale @xmath219 , and second we complete the flow from @xmath219 down to @xmath220 . in the first discrete rg step we integrate out the symmetric part @xmath221 of the fermi function in the contraction ( [ liouville_contraction ] ) . the discrete rg step for the kernel ( [ value_kernel ] ) and the vertex @xmath159 has been performed in ref . . here we will derive the analog results for the kernel and the vertex @xmath203 . this is achieved by decomposing the contraction ( [ liouville_contraction ] ) according to @xmath222,\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath223 . using this decomposition in , one finds that each diagram decomposes into a series of blocks which are irreducible with respect to the symmetric part @xmath224 ( i.e. , any vertical line hits at least one symmetric contraction ) and connected to each other by antisymmetric contractions @xmath225 . the blocks which are irreducible with respect to @xmath224 can be formally resummed into an effective kernel @xmath226 and a newly generated effective vertex @xmath227 . the lowest order diagrams are shown in fig . [ fig : discrete_lg ] . ( left and middle diagram ) and the effective vertex @xmath227 ( right diagram ) when the symmetric part of the contraction is integrated out . @xmath228 ( @xmath229 ) denotes the symmetric ( antisymmetric ) contraction @xmath224 ( @xmath225 ) . ] using the diagrammatic rules together with ( [ contraction_decomposition ] ) and the convention ( [ e_definition ] ) , we obtain for the first two diagrams @xmath230 and for the third one ( including the interchange @xmath231 ) @xmath232 we use here the original perturbation series ( [ value_kernelb ] ) so that the unperturbed liouvillian @xmath201 occurs in the resolvents . performing the frequency integrations and assuming the band - width to be large , we obtain @xmath233 where we have performed the sum over the keldysh indices and used . we stress at this point that the kernel @xmath234 and the renormalized vertex @xmath235 without external lines are identical , @xmath236 nevertheless we will retain the distinction between the kernel and the vertex in the following , as the former appears in the final formulas for the correlation functions , whereas the latter appears in the diagrammatic expressions for the r.h.s . of the rg equations . we note that the frequency dependence in is generated during the flow as shown below . after integrating out the symmetric part of the fermi function in this way , we obtain a new diagrammatic series for the kernel analog to ( [ value_kernelb ] ) . the liouvillian and the vertices have to be replaced by the effective ones and the contractions between the effective vertices contain only the antisymmetric part @xmath225 . due to there occur no diagrams including the new vertex @xmath237 . furthermore , since the effective quantities have become energy dependent ( also the effective vertex @xmath238 becomes energy dependent in higher order perturbation theory ) , one has to replace @xmath239 ( with @xmath240 ) in ( [ value_kernelb ] ) . since the antisymmetric part of the contraction ( [ contraction_decomposition ] ) does not depend on the keldysh indices , only the effective vertex @xmath238 averaged over the keldysh indices occurs in the new perturbative series . in the second continuous rg procedure we deal with the remaining antisymmetric part of the fermi distribution function , where in each infinitesimal step a small energy shell is integrated out . instead of integrating out the energies on the real axis , it has turned out to be more efficient to integrate out the matsubara poles of the fermi distribution function on the imaginary axis @xcite . this is achieved by introducing a formal cutoff dependence into the antisymmetric part of the fermi distribution by @xmath241 where @xmath242 are the matsubara frequencies corresponding to the temperature of reservoir @xmath31 , and @xmath243 is a theta function smeared by temperature . for @xmath244 , ( [ fermi_cutoff ] ) yields the full antisymmetric part @xmath245 of the fermi distribution . in each rg step , one reduces the cutoff @xmath217 by @xmath246 , and integrates out the infinitesimal part @xmath247 of the fermi distribution . for example , the new effective liouvillian at scale @xmath248 @xmath249 and similarly the new effective vertices @xmath250 and @xmath251 as well as the kernel @xmath252 can be calculated technically in the same way as for the first discrete rg step . the only difference is that an infinitesimal small part is integrated out , so that the rg diagrams contain only one contraction involving @xmath253 . furthermore , since the diagrams have to be irreducible with respect to this part , this contraction must connect the first with the last vertex of the diagram . using this procedure the rg equations for the dot liouvillian @xmath254 and the vertex @xmath255 have been derived in ref . . here we will use this technique to obtain the rg equations for @xmath256 as well as @xmath257 . in @xmath258 . the slash indicates the contraction where the fermi function has to be replaced by @xmath259 . ] up to @xmath260 . ] the diagrams contributing to the rg equations for @xmath261 and @xmath262 are shown in fig . [ fig : rgb12 ] and fig . [ fig : rgsigmab ] , respectively . using the definition @xmath263 together with the convention @xmath264 we obtain the following rg equations : @xmath265 , \label{eq : bvertexcontrg}\ ] ] and @xmath266 \nonumber\\ & & -\frac{d\gamma^\lambda_{1}}{d\lambda}\,\gamma_2^\lambda\,\gamma_3^\lambda\ , \bar{g}_{12}(\omega)\,\pi_{12}(\omega ) \bigl [ \mathcal{b}_\pm(\omega_{12}+\bar{\omega}_{12},\xi_{12}+\bar{\omega}_{12})\ , \pi_{12}(\xi)\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{2}3}(\xi_{12}+\bar{\omega}_{12})\nonumber\\ * & & \hspace{20 mm } + \bar{g}_{\bar{2}3}(\omega_{12}+\bar{\omega}_{12})\,\pi_{13}(\omega)\ , \mathcal{b}_\pm(\omega_{13}+\bar{\omega}_{13},\xi_{13}+\bar{\omega}_{13})\ , \bigr]\pi_{13}(\xi)\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{3}\bar{1}}(\xi_{13}+\bar{\omega}_{13 } ) . \label{eq : bkernelcontrg}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we recall here that the kernel @xmath267 and the vertex without external lines @xmath188 equal each other , see , which yields a closed set of rg equations . we will further show in app . [ sec : b12 ] that the two - loop diagrams for @xmath203 as well as the one - loop diagrams containing @xmath203 itself do not contribute at second order in the coupling constant and hence can be neglected on the r.h.s . of . the initial conditions of the rg equations are given by ( [ eq : bkernela ] ) and ( [ eq : b12a ] ) . since @xmath268 , the solution at @xmath220 provides the result for the kernel @xmath269 from which the correlation functions can be calculated via . as the resolvents and the vertices on the r.h.s . of the rg equations are analytic functions in all frequencies @xmath270 in the upper half of the complex plane , all frequency integrations can be calculated analytically . the only poles contributing are the ones of the contractions and their derivatives given by with as well as @xmath271 here @xmath272 denotes the matsubara frequency @xmath273 which lies closest to the cutoff @xmath217 . after performing the integration we find@xcite that , due to the presence of the cutoff function @xmath274 , the r.h.s . of the rg equations gives a negligible contribution for @xmath275 . therefore , we can start the rg at @xmath276 and omit the cutoff function @xmath277 ( the precise ratio between @xmath278 and @xmath35 is determined such that no linear terms in @xmath35 in the effective liouvillian are generated @xcite ) . as a consequence , only the matsubara poles of the fermi function in the upper half plane contribute and all real frequencies are simply replaced by matsubara frequencies . from now on , we write the frequency dependence explicitly and define the analytic continuation of the liouvillian and the vertices in imaginary frequency space by @xmath279 where we keep the real and imaginary parts of the laplace variable @xmath74 and the external frequencies @xmath280 and @xmath281 separated from now on . furthermore , @xmath282 , @xmath283 correspond to matsubara frequencies and the compact indices @xmath284 and @xmath285 on the l.h.s . do no longer contain the frequencies @xmath286 . with the definition @xmath287 the rg equations and in matsubara space can be written as @xmath288 and @xmath289\nonumber\\ * & & \hspace{-25mm}\qquad\times \,\pi(\xi_{13},\xi'+\lambda_{t_{\alpha_1}}\!\!+\omega_3)\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{3}\bar{1}}(\xi_{13},\xi'+\lambda_{t_{\alpha_1}}\!\!+\omega_3 ; -\omega_3,-\lambda_{t_{\alpha_1 } } ) . \label{eq : bkernelmatsubara}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in these equations we implicitly sum over all indices and matsubara frequencies on the r.h.s . of the rg equations which do not occur on the l.h.s . only positive matsubara frequencies smaller than the cutoff @xmath217 are allowed and each sum has to be written as @xmath290 which reduces to an integral @xmath291 for zero temperature . in the next two subsections we will solve the rg equations ( [ eq : bvertexmatsubara ] ) and ( [ eq : bkernelmatsubara ] ) analytically in the weak coupling regime up to @xmath258 . weak coupling is defined by the condition that the renormalized vertices @xmath292 stay small compared to one throughout the rg flow , so that the expansion in powers of @xmath159 on the r.h.s . of the rg equations is well defined . this condition is fulfilled if the various cutoff scales occurring in the resolvents are much larger than the kondo temperature @xmath3 at which the vertices would diverge in the absence of any cutoff scales . as is discussed in detail in refs . there exists a characteristic energy scale @xmath294 where @xmath295 is the renormalized magnetic field . for @xmath296 the cutoff scales @xmath297 , @xmath298 and @xmath5 can be neglected in the rg equation for the vertex @xmath215 ( see below ) . this leads to a reference solution @xmath299 which serves as the starting point for a systematic expansion in powers of the coupling constant @xmath300 , where @xmath301 ( see ( [ g_vertex_liouville ] ) together with ) . this yields a perturbative solution of the rg equations in the regime @xmath296 . these results serve as initial values for the flow in the second regime @xmath302 . here the renormalization of the vertex @xmath303 is at least of order @xmath10 , where @xmath304 . provided the weak - coupling condition @xmath305 is satisfied all quantities can be calculated perturbatively . this fact crucially relies on the appearance of some relaxation / dephasing rate in the resolvents , which is guaranteed by ( as then in all resolvents standing left to a vertex @xmath215 the zero eigenvalue of the liouvillian can not contribute ) . this analysis has been performed for the liouvillian and the current kernel in the anisotropic kondo model in ref . . we note that the zero eigenvalue may appear in the resolvent left to the vertex @xmath188 in . we will show below that this does not lead to any problems in the calculation of the spin - spin correlation functions in the kondo model up to order @xmath10 . regarding the appearance of the external frequency @xmath306 as one of the cut - off parameters in we see from the perturbative expansion that @xmath307 does not appear in the resolvents and as a cut - off parameter for all vertices right to @xmath188 . this fact , however , will only affect the results in the regime @xmath308 . we will therefore use as unique cut - off for all vertices appearing in the derivation of the kernel @xmath309 . in sec . [ sec : expl ] we will show that for the spin operator in the kondo model the difference yields a correction @xmath310 and can thus be neglected . nevertheless we stress that all vertices appearing in the stationary reduced density matrix @xmath311 in do not possess @xmath307 as cut - off parameter . we thus deduce that in order to stay in the perturbative regime we can not rely on the external frequency @xmath307 but have to require @xmath312 . we finally note that temperature serves as a unique cutoff for all terms on the r.h.s . of the rg equations as for @xmath313 the matsubara sums are reduced to one term and the cutoff @xmath314 becomes independent of @xmath217 . this trivial cutoff is set to zero in the following , i.e. we will set @xmath315 . after these preliminary remarks let us turn to the evaluation of the rg equations . the one - loop rg equation for the vertex @xmath215 is at zero temperature given by @xcite @xmath316 the rg equation for the reference solution @xmath317 is obtained by assuming @xmath217 to be much larger than any other term appearing in the resolvent , which gives @xmath318 . \label{eq : poorman}\ ] ] the initial condition for @xmath319 at @xmath320 is the bare vertex @xmath321 defined in . the leading order solution is proportional to the coupling constant @xmath322 . we stress that the term on the r.h.s . , which is @xmath323 , contributes to the change of the vertex at order @xmath324 . this is a general feature of the rg above @xmath219 . in order to calculate the change of a quantity at order @xmath325 one has to analyze those terms @xmath326 , where @xmath327 is some energy scale , and @xmath328 on the r.h.s . of the corresponding rg equation . in contrast , terms @xmath329 @xmath330 do not contribute to the change at order @xmath325 . the rg equation for the vertex @xmath331 is given by with the replacement @xcite @xmath332 . using this leading order solution we can formally expand all quantities in powers of @xmath324 , i.e. @xmath333 here @xmath68}_-$ ] is the bare dot liouvillian . we recall , which implies @xmath334 in all orders in @xmath324 . furthermore , we have already indicated which terms will depend on the matsubara frequencies , external frequencies @xmath335 and @xmath336 and the laplace variable @xmath337 . the vertex @xmath215 and the liouvillian were calculated in ref . . we will here state those results needed for the calculation of and . the second order vertex @xmath338 is further decomposed as @xmath339 here the vertex @xmath340 is given by @xcite @xmath341.\ ] ] for the kondo model the vertex @xmath342 turns out to have the same matrix structure as the leading order solution @xmath299 . this implies that both can be put together by redefining @xmath343 , which amounts to a two - loop renormalization of the kondo temperature @xcite . furthermore , the vertex @xmath344 is generically given by @xmath345 the zeroth - order liouvillian is given by the initial condition @xmath68}_-$ ] with while the first - order liouvillian is further decomposed as @xmath346 where @xmath347 and @xmath348 do not depend on the laplace variable . the second - order liouvillian was calculated in ref . , however , we will not need it for the solution of ( [ eq : bvertexmatsubara ] ) and ( [ eq : bkernelmatsubara ] ) in the regime @xmath296 . let us now turn to the calculation of and . the zeroth - order term of the kernel is just given by the initial condition , i.e. @xmath349}_\pm.\ ] ] for the derivation of an rg equation for @xmath350 we have to keep all terms @xmath351 on the r.h.s . of ( [ eq : bkernelmatsubara ] ) . taking the zero - temperature limit and keeping only the order @xmath352 in the resolvents we obtain @xmath353 we evaluate this integral by assuming @xmath354}_-=\kappa\,\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0 ) } , \label{eq : defkappa}\ ] ] which has to be checked for the specific model at hand . in the kondo model we will find @xmath355 for @xmath356 and @xmath357 for @xmath358 ( see sec . [ sec : expl ] below ) . can be used to shift @xmath359 to the right and evaluate the remaining integral by a partial fraction expansion @xmath360\bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1)},\quad \label{eq : rgb1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have defined @xmath361 the leading term in is extracted by treating the terms @xmath362 separately , @xmath363 where @xmath364 can be integrated by @xmath365 with @xmath366 which has the asymptotic behavior @xmath367 as @xmath368 . using in we obtain the frequency independent result @xmath369 the initial condition is given by , i.e. @xmath370 . as mentioned above we identify this with the vertex in first order , @xmath371 . using the result for @xmath372 we derive in app . [ sec : b12 ] the vertex , which is given by @xmath373 , \label{eq : b12result}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath374 ( see sec . [ sec : expl ] below ) . we note that @xmath375 . for large @xmath217 and using the result we can derive the rg equation for the kernel in second order ( see app . [ sec : bkernel ] ) @xmath376\bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1)}\nonumber\\ * & & \hspace{-20mm}-\frac{{\text{i}}}{2\lambda}\bigl [ \bar{g}_{12}^{(2a_1)}\,\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\,\bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1 ) } + \bar{g}_{12}^{(1)}\,\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\,\bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(2a_1 ) } \bigr]-\frac{1}{2\lambda}\,\bar{g}_{12}^{(1)}\,\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(1)}\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1 ) } + \frac{1}{2\lambda}\,\bar{g}_{12}^{(1)}\ , { \left[z^{(1)},\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\right]}_+\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1 ) } , \label{eq : b2kernelrg}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath377 . the initial condition is given by . at this point it turns out to be useful to decompose the second - order kernel as @xmath378 here @xmath379 is given by @xmath380\bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1)},\label{eq : sigmab2aabovelc}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which satisfies the initial condition @xmath381 the remaining terms in satisfy @xmath382,\quad\label{eq : sigmab2babovelc}\\ & & \frac{d}{d\lambda}\sigma_b^{\pm,(2c)}= -\frac{1}{2\lambda}\,\bar{g}_{12}^{(1)}\,\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(1)}\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1)}\nonumber\\ * & & \quad+\frac{1}{2\lambda}\,\bar{g}_{12}^{(1)}\ , { \left[z^{(1)},\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\right]}_+\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1)},\label{eq : sigmab2cabovelc}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with initial condition ( according to ( [ eq : bkernela ] ) and ( [ eq : sigmab2a_initial ] ) ) @xmath383 the rg equations in the regime @xmath296 derived in this section for a model describing spin / orbital fluctuations will be specialized and solved for the isotropic kondo model in sec . [ sec : kondolargel ] below . in the next section we will first study the effect of the rg flow in the regime @xmath302 . as explained in ref . the rg above @xmath219 has resummed all leading and subleading logarithmic contributions in @xmath384 into the renormalized vertices . at @xmath385 , the bare coupling constant is replaced by a renormalized one @xmath11 , all logarithmic contributions are eliminated , and a simple power series in @xmath11 remains . thus the rg equations can be solved perturbatively provided @xmath386 . in addition , the liouvillian in the resolvents is replaced by the full effective liouvillian @xmath80 . when calculating diagrams containing the resolvent an obvious problem is that the frequency dependence of the effective liouvillian @xmath80 is not known explicitly . to circumnavigate this complication we use the following approximation for the resolvents , @xmath387 here the poles @xmath388 of the resolvent follow from the self - consistency equation @xmath389 the residue satisfy @xcite @xmath390 and hence can be set to one in the following . starting with the one - loop rg equation for the vertex @xmath215 we observe that the terms on the r.h.s . are already of @xmath391 . therefore , the renormalization of the leading - order vertex @xmath299 stops at @xmath385 and we have to use its value @xmath392 in all calculations from now on . note that we indicate the use of the coupling constant at @xmath219 by the additional superscript @xmath393 . furthermore , as we are eventually interested in the kernel @xmath394 up to @xmath391 we deduce that the higher - order vertices @xmath340 and @xmath344 will not be needed below @xmath219 . using the replacement @xmath395 in we obtain up to @xmath391 @xmath396 where we have already used that the flow of the kernel in order @xmath324 also stops at @xmath219 . the second - order kernel satisfies @xmath397 where we have used the approximation and only kept terms @xmath398 . the initial condition is given by the solution at @xmath385 . using the decomposition we obtain @xmath399 where the flow of @xmath400 below @xmath219 is governed by . the initial value at @xmath385 is given by , which we can rewrite as @xmath401\nonumber\\ * & & \hspace{-30mm}\times \bar{g}^{(1)c}_{12}\,p_i(z_i)\,\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\,p_j(z_j)\ , \bar{g}^{(1)c}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}. \label{eq : sigmab2ainitiallambdac}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in doing so we have assumed @xmath402 and neglected terms of order @xmath403 . we will show in app . [ sec : ass ] that these assumptions are fulfilled for the kondo model in a magnetic field . we will further show that @xmath404 for all pairs @xmath405 for which the last line in is non - zero . when applying the results of this section to other models of spin / orbital fluctuations one has to ensure the validity of the assumptions made above . the initial value problem with is readily solved using @xmath406 with @xmath407 the result for the kernel at @xmath220 is then obtained using @xmath408 : @xmath409 . \label{eq : sigmab2aresult}\end{aligned}\ ] ] together with @xmath410 and @xmath411 determined in the rg procedure above @xmath219 this yields the final result for the kernel in second order in @xmath11 . it is applicable to any operator @xmath118 which does not couple the dot and reservoir degrees of freedom , i.e. whose initial value satisfies @xmath151 in . furthermore the calculations were done for a generic model describing spin or orbital fluctuations as the initial vertex @xmath159 was assumed to have two external legs . the only assumptions we have made regarding the model specifics are the commutation relations and , eqs . and as well as the specific relation between the parameter @xmath412 and the poles @xmath388 and @xmath413 , which have to be determined from the self - consistency equation . in the next section we will apply the results derived above to the spin - spin correlation functions in the isotropic kondo model . in particular , we will show that the assumptions discussed above are justified in this model . finally we note that similar results for the effective liouvillian have been derived in refs . . in this section we will specialize the generic results derived above to the case of the spin - spin correlation functions in the isotropic , antiferromagnetic kondo model in a magnetic field . the hamiltonian was presented in sec . [ sec : kondo ] ; in particular , the dot hamiltonian and the coupling to the leads as given in and . the first step is to represent the initial vertex and hamiltonian in liouville space , @xmath414}_-=h_0\,(l^{+z}+l^{-z})=h_0\,l^h,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the spin superoperators @xmath415 are defined by their action on an arbitrary operator @xmath82 on the dot hilbert space via @xmath416 an explicit matrix representation for the superoperators @xmath417 is given in app . [ sec : appl ] , where also further superoperators are defined . the leading - order vertex @xmath299 was derived in refs . . it can be parametrized for @xmath418 as @xmath419 where @xmath420 is the vector formed by the pauli matrices . the vertex for @xmath421 is obtained using the antisymmetry @xmath422 . inserting into the rg equation and using the antisymmetry @xmath423 , , and @xmath424 we obtain @xmath425 if we assume the form , i.e. @xmath426 with @xmath427 , we obtain the usual poor - man scaling equation @xmath428 with the solution @xmath429 eq . explicitly shows that the term @xmath323 on the r.h.s . contributes to the renormalization in order @xmath324 . similarly , the renormalization of a quantity in order @xmath325 is determined by the terms @xmath430 as well as @xmath328 . in contrast , a term @xmath431 with @xmath432 does not contribute at order @xmath325 , as can be seen from @xmath433 the vertex @xmath331 is given by @xmath434 beside the leading - order vertex and the zero - order liouvillian we also need explicit expressions for the vertex @xmath340 as well as the liouvillian in first order . these are given by @xcite @xmath435 where @xmath436 is the coupling of the leading - order vertex @xmath299 and the trace tr is taken in the reservoir indices , @xmath437 . furthermore we have taken the scaling limit @xmath438 , @xmath439 such that the kondo temperature @xmath3 remains constant . as the next step it is straightforward to derive the following results for the initial vertex @xmath359 : @xmath440 where @xmath228 takes the values @xmath441 for @xmath442 and we have set @xmath443 , @xmath444 . we stress that in this way the spin operators are directly represented by their matrices in liouville space . hence , we do not have to use a pseudo - fermion representation of the kondo spin . the vertex @xmath160 defined in is just given by @xmath445 . furthermore , we recall that the kernels in zeroth order are just given by @xmath191 and @xmath446 , respectively . now the rg equation for @xmath350 reads @xmath447 where we have used and . the additional factor of two is due to the implicit summation over @xmath448 . hence the solution in the scaling limit is given by @xmath449 in second order we will here determine only the terms @xmath450 and @xmath451 as their flow is cut - off at @xmath385 . the remaining term @xmath400 will be derived in the next section . hence we have to solve the rg equation , which using and reads @xmath452 analogously we obtain for using , and @xmath453 the solutions read @xmath454 where we have already taken the scaling limit so that the contributions from the initial condition are negligible . as we have already explained above the rg flow of the leading order solution @xmath299 stops at the scale @xmath219 which is given by the maximal one of the external parameters , @xmath455 the value of the vertex at @xmath219 is given by with @xmath456 where due to the couplings satisfy @xmath457 with @xmath458 and @xmath459 the asymmetry ratio is defined as @xmath460 . as already mentioned the flow of all vertices right to @xmath188 does not stop at @xmath219 as defined in but rather at @xmath461 . this affects the result for the kernel @xmath309 only in the regime @xmath462 . we will discuss the changes in this case separately at the end of this section . we stress , however , that the flow of all vertices @xmath215 needed for the derivation of the stationary reduced density matrix @xmath311 is cut off by @xmath461 . hence in order to stay in the weak - coupling regime we need @xmath463 as the definition of the scale @xmath219 is to some extent arbitrary as long as it remains of the order of the external energy scales in the problem , it is necessary to study the effect of a redefinition @xmath464 with @xmath465 . this will induce a redefinition of the coupling as @xmath466 as we will show below , the redefinition @xmath464 does not change the final results for the liouvillian or the kernel @xmath309 up to order @xmath10 . the liouvillian up to @xmath391 can be parametrized as @xcite @xmath467 the liouvillian can be diagonalized ( see ) using the eigenvalues ( @xmath74 ) @xmath468 and the projectors @xmath469 the eigenvalues can now be used to determine the poles @xmath388 of the resolvent defined in . solving the self - consistency equation one finds @xmath470 , @xmath471 , and @xmath472 , where the spin relaxation and dephasing rates and the renormalized magnetic field are given up to @xmath391 by @xmath473 the higher order terms @xmath474 for the rates were obtained in ref . . the voltage was defined in and we always assume @xmath475 . as these rates are obtained from the liouvillian at @xmath476 and @xmath477 , respectively , the external frequency @xmath307 does not appear as a cut - off in the definition of @xmath219 . furthermore , we have defined the auxiliary functions @xmath478 which arises from terms like @xmath479 by neglecting the imaginary part of @xmath413 , which is proportional to @xmath480 , in the prefactor and takeing the real and imaginary parts . we note that as @xmath472 the renormalized magnetic field automatically appears in the logarithm . we have therefore also kept @xmath5 in the linear prefactor . the deviation of @xmath481 from @xmath482 is only important for @xmath483 and will be neglected otherwise . furthermore , we have omitted the imaginary part of the laplace variable , @xmath29 , since for the correlation functions calculated below we only need the liouvillian on the real axis . for @xmath484 and using , the functions in the parametrization are given up to order @xmath10 by @xcite @xmath485 in the last line we have replaced the bare magnetic field by the renormalized field , such that the latter appears consistently in all functions . the change is of @xmath486 . we further note that a redefinition @xmath464 yields the same result for the liouvillian with the replacement @xmath487 . naively , the linear terms in @xmath488 and @xmath489 yield additional contributions in order @xmath490 . these are , however , exactly cancelled by terms appearing from the logarithms using @xmath491 , where @xmath492 is given by with @xmath464 . the facts presented above allow us to justify the assumptions and made in sec . [ sec : genericrgbelowlambdac ] above for the specific case of the kondo model ( see app . [ sec : ass ] ) . after the recall of the liouvillian in second order we will finally evaluate the kernel @xmath394 in the kondo model . the flow of the kernel also stops at @xmath219 except for one term , namely @xmath400 . hence we find @xmath493 where the first term is given by or depending on the operator studied , and the second , fourth , and fifth is obtained from , as well as using the replacement @xmath494 . for the evaluation of the remaining contribution @xmath495 from let us first consider the operator @xmath358 . using @xmath496 for @xmath497 and @xmath498 ( in all other cases the l.h.s . vanishes ) we find @xmath499 we note that in the zero eigenvalue of the effective liouvillian appears in the resolvent left to @xmath500 . as we will show in the next section the resulting term does not contribute to the correlation functions . for the evaluation of the kernel for the calculation of the susceptibility we use @xmath501 0 , & \text{otherwise } , \end{array}\right . \label{eq : gpb - pg}\ ] ] which results in @xmath502\nonumber\\ * & & \hspace{-30 mm } -\frac{{\text{i}}}{2}\frac{j_rj_l}{\omega-\xi+{\text{i}}(\delta-\xi ' ) } \biggl[\left(\mathcal{h}_2(\omega+v+\tilde{h } ) + \mathcal{h}_2(\omega - v+\tilde{h})-\mathcal{h}_2(\omega+v-\tilde{h } ) -\mathcal{h}_2(\omega - v-\tilde{h})\right.\nonumber\\ * & & \left.\quad -\mathcal{h}_2(\xi+v+\tilde{h})-\mathcal{h}_2(\xi - v+\tilde{h } ) + \mathcal{h}_2(\xi+v-\tilde{h})+\mathcal{h}_2(\xi - v-\tilde{h})\right ) \left(l^a-\tfrac{1}{2}\,l^c\right)\nonumber\\ * & & -\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathcal{h}_2(\omega+v+\tilde{h } ) + \mathcal{h}_2(\omega - v+\tilde{h})+\mathcal{h}_2(\omega+v-\tilde{h } ) + \mathcal{h}_2(\omega - v-\tilde{h})\right.\nonumber\\ * & & \left.\quad -\mathcal{h}_2(\xi+v+\tilde{h})-\mathcal{h}_2(\xi - v+\tilde{h } ) -\mathcal{h}_2(\xi+v-\tilde{h})-\mathcal{h}_2(\xi - v-\tilde{h})\right)l^h \biggr ] . \label{eq : sigmab2aresult2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] next we consider the case @xmath503 and start with the evalution of the kernel @xmath504 from by using @xmath505 \mp\frac{{\text{i}}}{4}\frac{\gamma^{3z}(z_1)}{\gamma^a(z_1)}l^5_\pm , & i=1,j=-,\\[2 mm ] 0 , & \text{otherwise}. \end{array}\right.\end{aligned}\ ] ] hence the double sum in reduces to a sum over @xmath498 , where the two terms have opposite signs and otherwise equal each other up to the appearance of the rate @xmath15 in the second term . as can be easily shown this sum vanishes in second order , i.e. @xmath506 similarly , the kernel @xmath507 is evaluated using @xmath508 \!\!-\frac{{\text{i}}}{4}l^4_\pm , & i=\pm , j=1,\\[2 mm ] 0 , & \text{otherwise } , \end{array}\right.\ ] ] which results in @xmath509\nonumber\\ * & & \hspace{-30 mm } -\frac{{\text{i}}}{2}\frac{j_rj_l}{\omega-\xi-\tilde{h}+{\text{i}}(\delta-\xi ' ) } \biggl[\left(\mathcal{h}_1(\omega+v)+\mathcal{h}_1(\omega - v ) -\mathcal{h}_2(\xi+v+\tilde{h})-\mathcal{h}_2(\xi - v+\tilde{h})\right ) l^5_\pm\nonumber\\ * & & + \left(\mathcal{h}_2(\omega+v-\tilde{h})+\mathcal{h}_2(\omega - v-\tilde{h } ) -\mathcal{h}_1(\xi+v)-\mathcal{h}_1(\xi - v)\right ) l^4_\pm\biggr ] . \label{eq : sigmab2aresult2pm}\end{aligned}\ ] ] a redefinition @xmath464 yields the same result for the kernels @xmath309 with the replacement @xmath487 as can be easily shown in the same way as for the liouvillian . finally , let us consider the kernel in first order in the regime @xmath510 . starting from we obtain using @xmath511 ( @xmath512 ) @xmath513 here the second vertex still depends on @xmath217 . when integrating this from @xmath461 to @xmath514 we obtain a contribution @xmath310 . hence we deduce @xmath515 a similar analysis shows that the difference between @xmath516 and @xmath517 is at least @xmath518 . in this section we will use the results for the liouvillian and the kernel to calculate the correlation functions and . we first calculate the auxiliary correlation functions using . we start with the parametrization of the liouvillian , which implies the form for the resolvent in @xmath519 . we further deduce from the previous section that the kernels @xmath520 admit the parametrizations @xmath521 where for example @xmath522 . we stress that in contrast to the parametrization of the liouvillian we have not introduced additional factors of @xmath523 here . the stationary reduced density matrix has the form @xmath524 with @xmath525 . the stationary reduced density matrix can be determined using . without magnetic field one simply finds @xmath526 . furthermore , the rates and are given by @xmath527 we now rewrite the resolvent using the projectors and use @xmath528&=&-\frac{1}{2}\,\delta_{i1 } , \quad\label{eq : bla1}\\ \mbox{tr}_s\bigl[\sigma_{s^z}(\omega)\,p_i(\omega)\ , \sigma_{s^z}^-(\omega,{\text{i}}0+)\,\rho_s^{st}\bigr]&=&\nonumber\\ * & & \hspace{-20mm}{\text{i}}\frac{\pi}{4}(j_r+j_l)^2\,\delta_{i1},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have applied as well as . we note in particular that the term @xmath529 does not contribute to . this yields with and @xmath530 : @xmath531 since @xmath532 we can neglect @xmath533 in . on the other hand , the real part of @xmath534 in the denominator has to be kept as it becomes large compared to @xmath307 in the small - frequency limit . hence we arrive at @xmath535 we note that the leading term of the susceptibility is of order @xmath10 . the correlation functions are plotted in figs . [ fig : plot1][fig : plot3 ] . we observe very good agreement with the results obtained by fritsch and kehrein using the flow - equation method @xcite . in the symmetric kondo model ( @xmath536 ) for various values of the applied voltage @xmath0 . ] in the symmetric kondo model ( @xmath536 ) for various values of the applied voltage @xmath0 . ] for @xmath537 and various values of the asymmetry ratio @xmath460 . ] let us further study the behavior of the correlation functions analytically . for small values of the frequency @xmath538 has the lorentzian form @xmath539 where we have used @xmath540 . this result for the small - frequency regime agrees with conclusions drawn from a mapping of the spin correlators to the one - particle green s function of majorana fermions @xcite . on the other hand , in the limit of large frequencies we find @xmath541 in agreement with the flow - equation method @xcite . we note that the @xmath542 appearing in the correlation function have their origin in the resolvent @xmath543 , hence the external frequency @xmath307 serves as a cut - off parameter in @xmath219 . this results in the logarithmic corrections at large frequencies . the susceptibility in the limiting regimes reads @xmath544 the first result shows a dependence of the gradient at small @xmath307 on the asymmetry ratio @xmath460 , while the second result indicates the revival of the fluctuation - dissipation theorem for @xmath545 . we note that the derivation of relies on the fact that the coupling constants @xmath11 appearing in the kernel @xmath546 are cut - off by the external frequency @xmath307 , as it was discussed at the end of sec . [ sec : expl ] . furthermore , the susceptibility @xmath547 has a maximum at @xmath548 , where it takes the value @xmath549 this behavior was also deduced using the flow - equation method @xcite . for various values of the asymmetry @xmath550 and applied voltage @xmath0 . in order to get a smooth behavior at @xmath551 we have kept the @xmath552 in the definition of @xmath553 in this region . the dotted line is a guide to the eye . ] in order to investigate the revival of the fluctuation - dissipation theorem we introduce the longitudinal fluctuation - dissipation ratio @xcite @xmath554 which is in equilibrium simply given by @xmath555 ( @xmath556 ) . using our results and we obtain @xmath557 which is plotted in fig . [ fig : plot4 ] . we find @xmath558 , i.e. the equilibrium result , whereas for small frequencies we get @xmath559 in agreement with refs . . we note that @xmath560 increases with increasing asymmetry @xmath550 as the coupling of the voltage to the dot becomes less effective . in the symmetric kondo model ( @xmath536 ) for @xmath537 and various values of the applied magnetic field @xmath1 . for @xmath562 we already have @xmath16 , which implies @xmath563 in order @xmath10 ( see sec . [ sec : longlargeh ] ) . ] in the presence of an external magnetic field the stationary reduced density matrix is given by @xmath564 , @xmath565 , @xmath566 , with the magnetization in leading order @xcite ( see also refs . ) @xmath567 to evaluate the correlation function we now use @xmath568\\ & \qquad\qquad= \left\{\begin{array}{ll}m\frac{\gamma^{3z}(\omega)}{\gamma^a(\omega)},&i=0,\\ -\frac{1}{2}-m\frac{\gamma^{3z}(\omega)}{\gamma^a(\omega)},&i=1,\\ 0 , & i=\pm , \end{array}\right . \end{split}\ ] ] where the term @xmath529 again does not contribute . from this a straightforward calculation using yields the correlation function up to @xmath391 @xmath569 where the zero - frequency @xmath61-peak does not appear because of our definition . the suppression of the correlation function by the finite magnetic field is shown in fig . [ fig : plot5 ] , which agrees very well with similar plots obtained using the flow - equation method @xcite . in the zero - frequency limit we find @xmath570 while the leading term @xmath518 in the large frequency regime is given by ( including the logarithmic corrections in the coupling constants ) . furthermore we observe a weak feature at @xmath571 which has for @xmath572 the line shape @xmath573.\quad \label{eq : featurev - h}\end{aligned}\ ] ] similar features appear at @xmath574 . in the symmetric kondo model ( @xmath536 ) for @xmath537 and various values of the applied magnetic field @xmath1 . for @xmath575 we have @xmath16 , which implies @xmath576 in order @xmath10 ( see sec . [ sec : longlargeh ] ) . ] for the calculation of the susceptibility we need @xmath577\\ & \qquad\qquad=\left[\frac{{\text{i}}}{2}\,\gamma_{s^z}^{-,3z}(\omega ) + { \text{i}}\,m\,\gamma_{s^z}^{-,a}(\omega)\right]\delta_{i1 } , \end{split}\ ] ] which directly yields @xmath578 , \quad\label{eq : chipresultfiniteh}\\ \chi_{s^zs^z}''(\omega)&= & \left[\frac{\pi}{4}(j_r+j_l)^2+m\,re\,\gamma_{s^z}^{-,a}(\omega)\right ] \nonumber\\ * & & \qquad\times\frac{\omega}{\omega^2+re\,\gamma^a(\omega)^2}. \label{eq : chippresultfiniteh}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in we have kept the terms in the second line , which are of @xmath579 , as due to @xmath580 ( @xmath581 ) they become dominant in the small - frequency limit . for larger frequencies these terms have to be neglected . thus the static susceptibility is given in leading order by @xmath582 in agreement with the literature @xcite . for larger frequencies the real part of the susceptibility possesses logarithmic features at @xmath583 due to the term @xmath584 . for example , @xmath585 where the terms represented by the dots do not contain any logarithmic features at @xmath586 . the imaginary part of the susceptibility is plotted in fig . [ fig : plot6 ] . it has a finite gradient at @xmath587 given by @xmath588 as well as a maximum at @xmath548 , where it takes the value @xmath589 in the large - frequency limit @xmath590 coincides with the correlation function . furthermore , the imaginary part of the susceptibility has features at @xmath583 which have their origin in the function @xmath591 contained in @xmath592 and hence have a line shape similar to . for @xmath593 and different values of the asymmetry @xmath550 and magnetic field @xmath1 . in order to get a smooth behavior at @xmath594 we have kept the @xmath552 in the definition of @xmath553 . for @xmath16 the fluctuation - dissipation ratio is independently of @xmath307 given by @xmath595 . the dotted line is a guide to the eye . ] the fluctuation - dissipation ratio @xmath596 defined in reads in the presence of a magnetic field @xmath597 which is plotted in fig . [ fig : plot7 ] . larger values of the magnetic field push the system closer to its equilibrium behavior , as only those lead electrons in the energy interval @xmath598 can couple to the dot and thus induce the non - equilibrium behavior . we note , however , that the equilibrium result @xmath595 is only reached for @xmath599 . furthermore , increasing the asymmetry @xmath550 drives the system towards the equilibrium situation as the coupling of the voltage to the dot becomes less effective . this effect is suppressed by increasing the magnetic field as overall less electrons couple to the dot . for small frequencies we obtain @xmath600 in the symmetric kondo model ( @xmath536 ) for @xmath602 and various values of the applied voltage @xmath0 . the correlation function is given by @xmath603 . for @xmath604 the susceptibility vanishes in order @xmath10 . the line shape close to @xmath586 is given by . ] in the symmetric kondo model ( @xmath536 ) for @xmath602 and various values of the applied voltage @xmath0 . we observe characteristic logarithmic features at @xmath18 . ] in the case of a strong magnetic field , @xmath16 , the correlation functions up to quadratic order in the coupling are still given by , and , respectively , where the magnetization is simply @xmath605 . one can easily show using @xmath606 that @xmath607 , which implies the equilibrium result @xmath608 . furthermore , the correlation function vanishes identically in order @xmath10 for @xmath604 . physically the kondo spin is in its ground state @xmath609 and the energy difference to the state @xmath610 due to the external magnetic field is given by @xmath5 . hence one has to apply at least the frequency @xmath611 to obtain any response from the spin , where the energy @xmath0 is provided by the applied voltage . this has to be contrasted with the result for the susceptibility in the equilibrium kondo model derived by garst et al . they used a relation between the inelastic electron scattering and the correlation function to show that the susceptibility in equilibrium has the small - frequency behavior @xmath612 , i.e. it is non - zero for @xmath613 . this linear behavior was also observed by costi and kieffer @xcite as well as hewson @xcite using a numerical renormalization group calculation . in analogy , we expect the non - equilibrium correlation functions to be nonzero for @xmath604 in higher order in @xmath11 . the consistent calculation of terms @xmath614 in the real - time rg procedure applied here would involve , however , 5-loop diagrams and is hence beyond the scope of this work . the correlation function in the regime @xmath16 is plotted in fig . [ fig : plot8 ] . we find excellent agreement with numerical results recently obtained by fritsch and kehrein using the flow - equation method @xcite . in particular , we observe a splitting of the sharp edge at @xmath586 due to the applied voltage , which leads to characteristic features at @xmath18 . using our result we can derive analytic expressions for the line shape close to these frequencies . for example , at @xmath4 we find @xmath615 the first term shows that the gradient of @xmath547 will become negative for @xmath613 if the applied voltage is large enough , i.e. @xmath616 . in the vicinity of @xmath617 the correlation function shows similar kink - like behavior . the physical origin of these kinks lies in the fact that at each of the energies @xmath18 a new process sets in , which involves a spin - flip on the dot costing the zeeman energy @xmath5 as well as the virtual hopping of an electron on and off the dot gaining or costing the energy @xmath618 , @xmath619 , or @xmath0 , respectively . the real part @xmath620 of the susceptibility shows logarihmic features at @xmath18 as is shown in fig . [ fig : plot8a].we stress that the splitting of the sharp edge at @xmath586 is a true non - equilibrium effect . finally let us discuss the transverse correlation functions in the presence of a magnetic field . we note that by virtue of we can restrict ourselves to the @xmath621-correlations . the corresponding kernels up to second order in @xmath11 were calculated in , , , , as well as . we will first discuss the susceptibility and present the results for the correlation function afterwards . in the symmetric kondo model ( @xmath536 ) for @xmath602 and various values of the applied voltage @xmath0 . ] for @xmath622 , @xmath602 , and various values of the asymmetry ratio @xmath460 . the result is invariant under @xmath623 . ] in order to derive the susceptibility we start with the parametrization @xmath624 where for example @xmath625 . note that we already indicated that the explicit frequency dependence in order @xmath10 appears in @xmath626 exclusively . ( there is of course an implicit frequency dependence of @xmath627 and @xmath628 through @xmath11 . ) now using @xmath629\nonumber\\*[1 mm ] & & \qquad={\text{i}}\left(\gamma_{s^+}^{-,3}+\bigl(\gamma_{s^+}^{-,2 } + 2\gamma_{s^+}^{-,5}(\omega)\bigr)m\right)\delta_{i+}\qquad\end{aligned}\ ] ] we obtain @xmath630 where we have introduced the short - hand notation @xmath631 . for @xmath632 we find @xmath633 . the transverse susceptibility has a peak at the solution of @xmath634 which is up to first order solved by @xmath635 in a finite magnetic field the spin on the dot will be in its ground state @xmath609 . the energy difference to the excited state @xmath610 is given by @xmath5 , leading to an enhanced response of the system at this frequency . at the peak the imaginary part of the susceptibility takes the value @xmath636 as is shown in figs . [ fig : plot9 ] and [ fig : plot10 ] . the peak is suppressed by increasing the voltage , since this reduces the probability for the kondo spin to be in its ground state . on the other hand , for a fixed value of the voltage the peak increases with increasing asymmetry ratio as the coupling of the voltage to the dot becomes less effective . the width of the peak is up to order @xmath10 given by @xmath637 with the limiting cases @xmath638 in the equilibrium limit , @xmath639 , this corresponds to the result obtained in ref . . the real part of the transverse susceptibility possesses logarithmic features similar to at @xmath18 . using a pseudo - fermion representation of the kondo spin together with non - equilibrium perturbation theory paaske et al . @xcite previously obtained the transverse susceptibility . in order to compare these results to we first make the approximations @xmath640 and @xmath641 . in the limit @xmath642 we then obtain using @xmath643 @xmath644 in the regime @xmath645 we have @xmath646 , thus we can neglect @xmath628 as well as @xmath626 in the numerator in , which results in @xmath647 these approximations agree with the results obtained in ref . ( we have to replace @xmath648 due to a different sign in the definition of the bare dot hamiltonian @xmath21 ) . furthermore , in the regime @xmath649 we can use @xmath650 where we have replaced @xmath651 in the real part of @xmath626 , to obtain @xmath652 this confirms a conjecture by paaske et al . we would like to stress , however , that our result goes beyond the approximation . in analogy to the susceptibility one finds for the correlation function @xmath653 where we have neglected all terms of order @xmath403 in the numerator . this allows the calculation of the transverse fluctuation - dissipation ratio @xmath654 which is plotted in fig . [ fig : plot11 ] . for negative frequencies @xmath655 the fluctuation - dissipation ratio takes the value @xmath656 , whereas for frequencies @xmath657 we find @xmath658 , thus recovering the equilibrium situation in these limits . as for the longitudinal fluctuation - dissipation ration we observe that increasing the magnetic field or the asymmetry ratio @xmath550 drives the system towards the equilibrium situation . for @xmath593 and various values of the asymmetry ration @xmath550 and the applied magnetic field @xmath1 . the plot shows good agreement with similar results obtained in ref . . the dotted line is a guide to the eye . ] in this article we have generalized the real - time renormalization group method in frequency space to allow the calculation of dynamical correlation functions of arbitrary dot operators in systems describing spin and/or orbital fluctuations . we applied this to the two - lead kondo model in a magnetic field , where we calcualted the longitudinal and transverse spin - spin correlation and response functions up to second order in the exchange coupling . we wish to stress that within this formalism the kondo spin is directly represented by matrices in liouville space , hence there is no need to apply a pseudo - fermion representation . specifically , we derived the two - loop rg equations for the dot operators and solved them analytically up to order @xmath10 in the weak - coupling regime . here @xmath11 denotes the effective coupling at the energy scale @xmath12 which has to satisfy @xmath14 . our results show several features attributed to the non - equilibrium situation , e.g. the splitting of the edge at @xmath586 of the longitudinal correlation function in a strong magnetic field or the suppression of the peak in the transverse susceptibility by a finite applied voltage . furthermore , we find very good agreement with results for the longitudinal correlation function recently obtained by fritsch and kehrein using the flow - equation method @xcite . a particular advantage of our approach is the possibility to obtain analytic expressions for all correlation functions in the weak coupling limit . we have calculated the spin - spin correlation functions for the nonequilibrium kondo model in the weak coupling regime @xmath14 . the regime of strong coupling , @xmath659 , is still an open problem . in this case , the exchange couplings @xmath11 become of order @xmath660 and a controlled truncation of the rg equations is no longer possible . within the present rtrg - fs method it was shown in ref . that the relaxation / dephasing rates saturate to the kondo temperature in the strong coupling regime . as an effect the coupling constants do not diverge as in poor man scaling methods but remain finite . however , the numerical solution of the rg equations in lowest order showed an instability against an exponentionally small change in the initial condition for the relaxation / dephasing rates . although it was possible to find excellent agreement for the temperature dependence of the linear conductance with nrg calculations , it was necessary to fine tune the initial condition for the rates . therefore , up to now , it is not yet clear whether a controlled solution of the strong coupling regime is possible by using rtrg - fs . the nonequilibrium kondo model describes the spin fluctuation ( or coulomb blockade ) regime of the more general nonequilibrium anderson impurity model ( for a systematic derivation of the kondo model from the anderson model using a schrieffer - wolff transformation , see e.g. ref . ) . in this model the single - particle spectral function is of most interest , which has recently been studied within nrg in a scattering wave basis @xcite . the present rtrg - fs method can also be applied to this model but , as explained in detail in ref . , in the charge fluctuation regime it is not yet clear whether a well - defined weak coupling regime exists at zero temperature . at resonance ( i.e. when the renormalized single - particle level is identical to one of the chemical potentials of the leads ) there is no energy scale except the broadening of the level itself and the expansion parameter is of order @xmath660 . nevertheless the results obtained in ref . ( using a previous version of the real - time rg method ) after an a priori uncontrolled truncation of the rg equations were in excellent agreement with the bethe ansatz solution @xcite for the equilibrium occupation of the local level . these and related topics are of high interest and will be the subject of forthcoming research . we would like to thank benjamin doyon , markus garst , stefan kehrein , verena krting , mikhail pletyukhov , and frank reininghaus for valuable discussions . this work was supported the dfg - forschergruppe 723 `` functional renormalization group in correlated fermion systems '' and the dfg - forschergruppe 912 `` coherence and relaxation properties of electron spins '' . obviously the time - dependent correlation function can be written as @xmath661}_+\bigr\rangle_{st}- \bigl\langle a\bigr\rangle_{st}\bigl\langle b\bigr\rangle_{st}.\ ] ] now , applying the time - translational invariance @xmath662 for all @xmath663 fixed and finite as well as the relation @xmath664}_\pm\bigr\rangle_{st}^*= \bigl\langle{\left[a(t)_\mathrm{h},b(0)_\mathrm{h}\right]}_\pm\bigr\rangle_{st},\ ] ] which can be verified by a straightforward calculation using @xmath83 , we obtain . in the same way can be used to derive the relation @xmath665 . in this appendix we will calculate the vertex @xmath667 . starting from ( [ eq : bvertexmatsubara ] ) we first take the zero - temperature limit . furthermore , we can expand the resolvents up to @xmath668 as@xcite @xmath669 with @xmath670}_+.\ ] ] using this we obtain together with the expansion @xmath671 in ( [ eq : bvertexmatsubara ] ) @xmath672}_+\right ) \frac{1}{\xi_{12}+{\text{i}}\xi'+{\text{i}}\lambda+{\text{i}}\omega_1-l_s^{(0)}-\tilde{l}_s^{(1 ) } } \left(1-\frac{z^{(1)}}{2}\right)\bar{g}_{\bar{2}1 ' } -(1\leftrightarrow 1'),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have omitted the arguments of the vertices @xmath215 for simplicity . using @xmath673}_-= \tilde{\kappa}\,\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)},\quad { \left[l_s^{(0)}+\tilde{l}_s^{(1)},\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(1)}\right]}_-= \tilde{\kappa}\,\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(1)},\quad { \left[l_s^{(0)}+\tilde{l}_s^{(1)},{\left[z^{(1)},\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\right]}_+\right]}_- = \tilde{\kappa}\,{\left[z^{(1)},\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\right]}_+ , \label{eq : commapp}\ ] ] with @xmath674 for @xmath356 and @xmath675 for @xmath358 ( see sec . [ sec : expl ] ) we obtain after a partial fraction expansion @xmath676}_+\right)\nonumber\\ * & & \,\times \left [ \frac{1}{\omega_{12}-\tilde{\kappa}+{\text{i}}\delta+{\text{i}}\lambda+{\text{i}}\omega_1 -l_s^{(0)}-\tilde{l}_s^{(1)}}- \frac{1}{\xi_{12}+{\text{i}}\xi'+{\text{i}}\lambda+{\text{i}}\omega_1-l_s^{(0)}-\tilde{l}_s^{(1 ) } } \right]\left(1-\frac{z^{(1)}}{2}\right)\bar{g}_{\bar{2}1 ' } + ( 1\leftrightarrow 1').\qquad\end{aligned}\ ] ] we see that no terms @xmath677 can occur on the r.h.s . and , hence , in order to determine the rg equation for @xmath667 we have to replace the vertices @xmath215 by the leading order ones @xmath299 and omit all terms containing @xmath372 , @xmath348 and @xmath678 . this yields using @xmath374 as well as @xmath679 : @xmath680\bar{g}_{\bar{2}1'}^{(1)}+(1\leftrightarrow 1 ' ) . \label{eq : b12rgapp}\end{aligned}\ ] ] using the rg equation for the leading - order vertex we can integrate up to higher - order corrections and obtain the solution , which in particular satisfies the initial condition @xmath681 as given by from the discrete rg step . . ] which contain @xmath203 itself . ] the two - loop diagrams for the vertex @xmath203 are shown in fig . [ fig : twoloopb12 ] . as each diagram contains three vertices @xmath682 and we are interested in the vertex up to second order , we have to extract the terms @xmath683 . this is done by expanding the resolvents in lowest order @xmath684 where @xmath685 ( @xmath29 ) stands for either @xmath307 ( @xmath61 ) or @xmath686 ( @xmath687 ) , respectively . using this we immediately see that the first two diagrams are proportional to @xmath688 the fourth and fifth to @xmath689 and the third and sixth to @xmath690 thus the two - loop diagrams behave as @xmath691 and hence do not contribute to the renormalization of the second - order vertex @xmath667 . finally we have to study the one - loop diagrams which contain @xmath203 itself . these diagrams are shown in fig . [ fig : rgoneloopb12withb12 ] . as we can easily see from , the leading - order result for @xmath203 behaves for large @xmath217 as @xmath692 now the one - loop diagrams contain an additional vertex @xmath215 as well as a resolvent @xmath693 . hence we deduce that the diagrams yield terms proportional to @xmath694 which do not contribute to the renormalization of the second - order vertex @xmath667 . in this appendix we will derive the rg equation for the second - order kernel @xmath696 . for this we have to evaluate all terms on the r.h.s . of . we start with the first line . using ( [ eq : restildel ] ) and expanding @xmath215 in powers of @xmath324 yields @xmath697}_+\right)\nonumber\\ * & & \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\times \frac{1}{\xi_{12}+{\text{i}}\xi'+{\text{i}}\lambda+{\text{i}}\omega_2-l_s^{(0)}-\tilde{l}_s^{(1 ) } } \left(1-\frac{z^{(1)}}{2}\right)\bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1 ) } \label{eq : appc1}\\ & & + \int_0^\lambda d\omega_2\ , \bigl({\text{i}}\,\bar{g}_{12}^{(2a_1)}+ \bar{g}_{12}^{(2b)}(\omega,\delta;\lambda,\omega_2)\bigr)\ , \frac{1}{\omega_{12}+{\text{i}}\delta+{\text{i}}\lambda+{\text{i}}\omega_2-l_s^{(0)}}\ , \mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\ , \frac{1}{\xi_{12}+{\text{i}}\xi'+{\text{i}}\lambda+{\text{i}}\omega_2-l_s^{(0)}}\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1)}\label{eq : appc2}\\ & & + \int_0^\lambda d\omega_2\,\bar{g}_{12}^{(1)}\ , \frac{1}{\omega_{12}+{\text{i}}\delta+{\text{i}}\lambda+{\text{i}}\omega_2-l_s^{(0)}}\ , \mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\ , \frac{1}{\xi_{12}+{\text{i}}\xi'+{\text{i}}\lambda+{\text{i}}\omega_2-l_s^{(0)}}\nonumber\\ * & & \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\times \bigl({\text{i}}\,\bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(2a_1)}+ \bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(2b)}(\xi_{12},\xi'+\lambda+\omega_2 ; -\omega_2,-\lambda)\bigr),\label{eq : appc3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have already neglected the terms @xmath348 and @xmath678 in the second and third line as they lead only to higher - order corrections . using the commutators the first line can be treated similarly to @xmath350 derived in sec . [ sec : wkabove ] . in the term @xmath698 we only keep the term containing @xmath364 ( the term @xmath699 was already used to calculate @xmath350 ) , while in the other two terms we have to extract the term @xmath677 . thus we arrive at @xmath700\bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1)}\\ & \qquad-\frac{1}{2\lambda}\,\bar{g}_{12}^{(1)}\,\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(1)}\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1 ) } + \frac{1}{2\lambda}\,\bar{g}_{12}^{(1)}\ , { \left[z^{(1)},\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\right]}_+\,\bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1)}. \end{split } \label{eq : appbkernelresult1a}\ ] ] using the same steps for the terms containing @xmath340 in and one finds @xmath701 . \label{eq : appbkernelresult1b}\ ] ] for the terms of and containing @xmath344 we use in the form @xmath702 when inserted into and the first terms do not depend on the integration variable @xmath703 . the remaining integral can be done as usual by a partial fraction expansion . this yields ( @xmath704 for @xmath356 and @xmath357 for @xmath358 ) @xmath705\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1)}\nonumber\\ * & & \hspace{-8mm}+ \frac{{\text{i}}}{\omega\!-\!\xi\!-\!\kappa\!+\!{\text{i}}(\delta\!-\!\xi')}\ , \bar{g}_{12}^{(1)}\,\left [ \mathcal{k}_\lambda(\omega_{12}+{\text{i}}\delta - l_s^{(0 ) } ) \mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}-\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\ , \mathcal{k}_\lambda(\xi_{12}+{\text{i}}\xi'-l_s^{(0)})\right]\ , \bar{g}^{(1)}_{\bar{2}3 } \ln\frac{2\lambda-{\text{i}}(\xi_{13}+{\text{i}}\xi'-l_s^{(0)})}{\lambda } \,\bar{g}^{(1)}_{\bar{3}\bar{1}}.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] if we now expand @xmath706 and the logarithm for large @xmath217 , @xmath707 and @xmath708 , and keep only the terms proportional to @xmath709 we arrive at @xmath710 \bar{g}_{\bar{3}\bar{1}}^{(1)}. \label{eq : bg2b1stterm}\ ] ] in contrast , the second terms of and do depend on the integration variable @xmath703 . the evaluations is , however , straightforward . we use a partial fraction expansion for the resolvents left and right to the vertex @xmath359 as well as @xmath711 this leads to integrals of the form @xmath712 where we are only interested in the @xmath683 terms . now using the asymmetry @xmath423 we find @xmath713 \bar{g}_{\bar{3}\bar{1}}^{(1)}. \label{eq : bg2b2ndterm}\ ] ] which has to be combined with for the full result from the terms containing @xmath344 . the second and third line of containing the vertex @xmath667 can be treated using the same steps as were used to evaluate the @xmath344-dependent parts of and . the result reads after some tedious but straightforward algebra @xmath714 \bar{g}_{\bar{3}\bar{1}}^{(1)}. \label{eq : appbkernelresult2}\ ] ] finally , to extract the leading term @xmath715 of the fourth line of one can simply replace the resolvents @xmath716 by @xmath717 . this yields @xmath718 \bar{g}_{\bar{3}\bar{1}}^{(1)}. \label{eq : appbkernelresult3}\ ] ] hence , the result for the rg equation of the kernel @xmath696 is obtained by summing , , , , and , using @xmath365 with in as well as @xmath719 \bar{g}_{\bar{3}\bar{1}}^{(1)}= \frac{d}{d\lambda}\,\bar{g}_{12}^{(1)}\,\mathcal{b}_\pm^{(0)}\ , \bar{g}_{\bar{2}\bar{1}}^{(1)}.\ ] ] this yields . consider an operator @xmath82 acting on the dot hilbert space having matrix elements @xmath720 with respect to the basis @xmath721 . if @xmath722 denotes the superoperator acting on dot operators via @xmath723}_\pm$ ] then for an arbitrary dot operator @xmath118 we have @xmath724 furthermore , we represent superoperators in the matrix representation @xmath725 if @xmath726 is the product of two superoperators , then @xmath727 and the matrix of @xmath77 is simply given by the matrix product of the matrices of @xmath728 and @xmath729 . a basis for the operators in the liouville space of the kondo dot can be built up by the spin superoperators @xmath730 and @xmath731 defined in . an explicit representation in the basis is provided by @xmath732 @xmath733 @xmath734 furthermore we define the operators @xmath735 as well as @xmath736 we note that @xmath737 as well as @xmath738 . in the spin sector we will use frequently @xmath739 as well as @xmath740 the liouville operators satisfy ( the sums are over @xmath741 while the index @xmath212 takes the values @xmath143 ) @xmath742}_+\,l^{2i}&= & \delta_{p-}\,\frac{{\text{i}}}{2}\,\text{tr}\,j\,l^h.\label{eq : appe5}\end{aligned}\ ] ] + the results for the liouvillian presented in sec . [ sec : resultsbelowlc ] allow us to obtain @xmath743 where we have used @xmath470 , @xmath744 and @xmath745 . furthermore , we can expand the zero - eigenvalue projector as @xmath746 where @xmath747 . this directly yields . to prove the final statement , @xmath404 for all pairs @xmath405 for which @xmath748 is non - vanishing , we note that for @xmath358 these pairs are given by ( see and ) @xmath749 for @xmath500 and @xmath750 for @xmath751 , respectively . on the other hand we have @xmath357 in both cases , which implies @xmath752 for @xmath358 . the same analysis can be performed for @xmath356 where the relevant pairs are given by @xmath753 for @xmath500 and @xmath754 for @xmath751 . Abstract:
[ "we calculate the dynamical spin - spin correlation functions of a kondo dot coupled to two noninteracting leads held at different chemical potentials . to this end we generalize a recently developed real - time renormalization group method in frequency space ( rtrg - fs @xcite ) to allow the calculation of dynamical correlation functions of arbitrary dot operators in systems describing spin and/or orbital fluctuations . the resulting two - loop rg equations are analytically solved in the weak - coupling regime . this implies that the method can be applied provided either the voltage @xmath0 through the dot or the external magnetic field @xmath1 are sufficiently large , @xmath2 , where the kondo temperature @xmath3 is the scale where the system enters the strong - coupling regime . explicitly , we calculate the longitudinal and transverse spin - spin correlation and response functions as well as the resulting fluctuation - dissipation ratios . the correlation functions in real - frequency space can be calculated in matsubara space without the need of any analytical continuation . we obtain analytic results for the line - shape , the small- and large - frequency limits and several other features like the height and width of the peak in the transverse susceptibility at @xmath4 , where @xmath5 denotes the renormalized magnetic field . furthermore , we discuss how the developed method can be generalized to calculate dynamical correlation functions of other operators involving reservoir degrees of freedom as well ." ]
15,525
15,525
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: nervous system is continuously confronted by megabytes of information , representing light , sound , smell , etc . this information is compiled by the brain into a set of decisions , representing behaviors of living organisms . the mechanisms involved in this reduction have been under investigation for many years ( glimcher , 2003 ; romo and salinas , 2003 ) . in this study we address a question complimentary to the issue of decision making ( dm ) mechanisms . we define neuronal units involved in making perceptual decisions . for this purpose we determine dm activity in surrogate networks , defined mathematically , in which a complete control is present over stimuli , mechanisms , and responses . such decision making analysis ( dma ) has practical significance , since once units involved in making particular decision are located , further efforts could be concentrated on uncovering the underlying mechanisms . in this study dm task is defined as evaluation of a function in the multidimensional stimulus space ( figure 1a ) . this function has a discrete set of values , representing the repertoire of responses available to the organism . the decisions may , of course , be stochastic , to reflect the uncertainty , pertinent to behavior . this definition is suitable for experiments where subjects perform poly - alternative forced - choice tasks , such as saccadic response to the direction of stimulus motion ( shadlen and newsome , 2001 ) . let us consider motion - discrimination task in more detail . figure 1b lists some visual areas , which are involved in this task . the areas are arranged along a rough sensory - motor axis , so that the areas on the left are more `` sensory '' , while those on the right are more `` motor '' . this implies that the responses in these areas are more correlated with stimulus or response respectively . where on this sensory - motor axis one should position the dm elements ? one could argue that the elements most correlated with the decision itself are the decision makers , following the analogy with the definition of sensory and motor elements . it is , however , difficult , if not impossible , to distinguish such definition from the definition of purely motor units ( shadlen and newsome , 2001 ) . the latter relay the results of decision making process , without involvement in the formation of the decision . an alternative approach is therefore needed to define the dm units . the dm components may be surmised to be located on the interface between sensory and motor areas . more precisely , the _ first _ element in the sensory - motor chain , which carries significant correlation with the response , may be identified as the decision maker . in this study we develop this idea into rigorous mathematical formulation and find a special correlation function , which determines contributions of units to dm . this formalism allows us to answer two questions pertaining to the identities of dm units . first , we consider the case when not one but _ several _ elements are involved in the same decision simultaneously . our approach allows us to evaluate relative importance of various units in such a distributed dm . second , we consider the systems with loops in connectivity . for such systems the concept of ` the first element ' becomes more arbitrary and one has to proceed more carefully in defining contributions to dm . we succeed in doing so for our surrogate networks and define dm units for recurrent networks in a way , which is consistent with the linear sensory - motor chains , thus satisfying the requirement of the correspondence principle . this paper is organized as follows . we first analyze simple linear chain models , and networks , such as trees , which have similar properties . we then use this analysis to define decision makers in networks of arbitrary connectivity . finally , we extend our study to the cases , when electric stimulation can be applied to units , and show that dm components can be identified in a way consistent with our preceeding analyses . the goal of this section is to formulate quantitative principles by which dm network elements can be identified . we approach this task by analyzing simple cases , which can be solved exactly without the use of computer , and in which the identities of dm elements are clear . these cases allow us to emphasize the properties of dm task we are attempting to describe . we proceed therefore to the analysis of the simplest network capable of making decisions . in this subsection we consider the network , which we call ` nematode ' , because of its resemblance to simple biological organisms , both in the layout and in the fundamental significance . we first define the model ; then show that it can make simple decisions ; and , finally , define the positions of decision makers in the network . consider a linear chain of units , whose response is characterized by a set of real numbers @xmath0 , where @xmath1 is the position of the element in the chain ( figure 2 ) . response of each element does not depend on time . this model is therefore static . this assumption is introduced here to simplify the analysis and can be relaxed as described below ( section [ trees ] ) . each unit performs a simple linear transformation between the unit s input and the output . thus , for element number @xmath2 @xmath3 here @xmath4 is noise associated with the element . in this work we assume that noise has zero mean , is individual to each unit , and , therefore , is uncorrelated between units , i.e. @xmath5 we further assume that noise has a gaussian distribution . the chain of linear elements is thus completely specified by a set of noise variances @xmath6 . the model described by ( [ eq1 ] ) and ( [ eq2 ] ) yields the following solution for the response of the last element in the chain @xmath7 thus , the response of the last element is just a sum of the input into network @xmath8 and noise contributions from all units , independently on the order of unit in the chain . the last element in the chain has non - linear response properties . its response is defined by @xmath9 where @xmath10 is the heaviside step function , which is equal to one / zero if the argument is positive / negative . it follows then that our ` nematode ' network is capable of making decisions based on the values of input variable @xmath8 . this is if we interpret variable @xmath11 , which is equal either 0 or 1 , as the result of dm process , as defined in figure 1a . the decisions are made stochastically and are dependent upon the instantiations of random variables @xmath4 , which vary from trial to trial . our model is completely defined by the set of noise variances , pertinent to each unit @xmath12 . although decisions made by this chain are quite simple , the identities of decision makers are not so easy to find . the distribution of impact to dm along the chain should depend upon the distribution of noise variables @xmath6 . our next goal is to develop a sensible definition of contributions to dm based on the vector of variances @xmath6 . before doing so we describe general input - output properties of the chain . since decision made by the network varies from trial to trial , one can define averaged over trials response of the system @xmath13 . as shown in figure 2b it has a sigmoid shape , smeared by the total amount of noise in the system . one can , therefore , consider two cases , depending on whether the signal - to - noise ratio for the chain is large or small . these two regimes are shown in figure 3a and b respectively . to analyze responses of units in these two cases we define their correlation with the decision . this correlation is defined for each element in the chain ( figure 3 , right ) . as a measure of correlation we choose mutual information ( mi ) between response of the @xmath14th unit , @xmath15 , and the decision , @xmath11 . mi has an advantage of being unitless ( it is measured in bits ) and having clear intuitive properties , as described below . we will also show below in this section that mi has limitations as a measure of dm . mi describes the information transmission from the @xmath14th unit to the output of the system . since the output can only have values 0 or 1 , mi can not exceed the value of one bit . we now consider two cases , depending on the network s signal - to - noise ratio . if network input @xmath16 is large , as in figure 3a , response of the system is well correlated with the input . hence , activities of all units are well correlated with both input and output , and @xmath17 for all of the units . in the opposite limit , when the signal - to - noise ratio is small , @xmath16 is smaller than noise , and the system s response is weakly correlated with the input ( figure 3b ) . in this case mi as a function of unit s position displays a structure , shown in figure 3b ( right ) . this structure , as shown below , has a key to the definition of dm components and is qualitatively discussed here . the units , which are close to the exit from the network , show strong correlation with the decision , similarly to the high signal - to - noise ratio case . their mi is therefore close to 1 bit . on the other hand , more ` sensory ' units , in the beginning of the chain are strongly correlated with the input . since input - output correlation is weak in low signal - to - noise ratio case , the ` sensory ' units display virtually _ no _ relation to the output and @xmath18 for such units ( figure 3b , right ) . thus , mi , as a function of @xmath2 displays a transition from 0 to 1 in the low signal - to - noise ratio case . how could one deduce identities of decision makers from these dependencies ( figure 3a and b ) ? one could suggest that the elements perfectly correlated with the output of the system , such as exit elements from the chain , are the ones that make the decision . however , such elements may be just the relay or ` motor ' units , in which case their contribution to dm is small . indeed , when we type , our decisions are perfectly correlated with activities of finger muscles ; but one could hardly blame our fingers for the content of the typing . thus , despite their high correlation with the output , exit elements could not be called decision makers . input elements , having no correlation with the decision , are responsible for dm in even lesser degree . we thus need to analyze the dependence of mi on position in more detail and suggest another scheme for defining dm units . our discarding of motor units as decision makers can be further extended onto the entire high signal - to - noise ratio case ( figure 3a ) . we suggest that the deterministic regime is not descriptive from the point of view of dm analysis . first , in this regime all units become indistinguishable from motor . the latter are not decision makers , as suggested above . second , the dependence shown in figure 3a ( right ) does not reveal the contributions of individual units to the decision . since all units have the same correlation , it is hard , if not impossible , to differentiate them and assign different contributions . third , the responses of units in this case are deterministically related to the input . hence , units act as relays , passively transmitting information along the chain . it can be argued that the external environment , providing the input variable @xmath8 , acts as the decision maker . we conclude that to find decision making activity one has to concentrate on the low signal - to - noise ratio case . we show below that the identities of decision making units can be deduced from the shape of transition in figure 3b ( right ) . to this end we analyze a set of examples of networks with various distributions of noise @xmath19 . we start from the simplest example of a single noisy unit . consider a chain in which noise is absent from all units but one , whose order number in the chain is @xmath20 ( figure 4 ) . since , according to our previous discussion , we need to consider the low signal - to - noise ratio case , we will assume that @xmath21 i.e. network receives no input . making the decision in this case is still possible , based on the values of noise inside the network . since noise is only present in one neuron , from ( [ eq3 ] ) we conclude that @xmath22 the decision made by the network is @xmath23 thus , decision is causally linked to the processes controlling unit number @xmath20 , which leads us to conclusion that this neuron is the decision maker . paradoxically , the noisiest unit in this simple formulation makes the largest impact . all noiseless elements , even nonlinear , are deterministic , and work as simple relays which transmit information from the previous node to the next one . the output of the circuit is linked to the processes controlling noise in neuron number @xmath20 , rather that in any other neuron in the network . one would be tempted to conclude that the non - linear element is actually the decision maker in this case . we deduce that the non - linear element does not have a causal effect on output from the circuit ; therefore its role is just to relay response from neuron @xmath20 to the output . in this respect the non - linear element is not different from other noiseless elements . to link this example to our previous discussion ( figure 3b ) we plot mi as a function of position in the chain in figure 4 ( top ) . as we discussed , mi is high for exit ( ` motor ' ) units and low for input ( ` sensory ' ) elements . figure 4 also shows the derivative of mi with respect to position in the chain . it is clear that this derivative represents the decision making element . thus , we conclude that not correlation with the decision but the _ rate of change _ of the latter along the network is the indicator of dm . our next example shows that the conclusion about derivative of mi is basically correct , but has to be slightly amended to be numerically precise . consider the chain in which all elements are noisy and the variance of noise is the same for each element . in this case @xmath24 i.e. all units contribute to decision _ equally_. this is because eq . ( [ eq8 ] ) does not distinguish the order in which contributions from the units are added , and all contributions are of equal strength on average . can this conclusion be confirmed by the derivative of mi ? figure 5a shows mi as a function of position in the chain for this case . this dependence is obtained in appendix a. it increases smoothly from 0 to 1 resulting in a non - zero derivative at all units . this is consistent with ( [ eq8 ] ) and the notion that all units participate in the decision . however , ( [ eq8 ] ) suggests that all units participate in decision _ equally_. the derivative of mi turns out to be slightly non - uniform , as seen in figure 5a . this can be corrected if not mi itself but a non - linear function of mi , denoted @xmath25 , is considered . this non - linear function is calculated in appendix a and is shown in figure 5b . the new correlator @xmath25 has the same basic properties as the mi . it rises from 0 to 1 monotonously when passing through the array ( figure 5c ) . but , in addition , its derivative turns out to be _ uniform _ , as shown in figure 5c ( bottom ) . this is consistent with equal participation of all units in dm in the uniformly distributed noise case and eq . ( [ eq8 ] ) . thus , we conclude that for this case the contributions to dm are given by the rate of increase of @xmath25 when moving through the array @xmath26 here @xmath2 is the index along the chain . ( [ eq9 ] ) is the main result of this paper . it represents our definition of contributions to dm for networks of simple connectivity , such as chains . three points should be made about the definition ( [ eq9 ] ) . first , it reproduces the result obtained in the previous example of noisy neuron . indeed , the mutual information rises from 0 to 1 on the noisy neuron in figure 4 . but @xmath25 coincides with mi at these values , as follows from its plot in figure 5b . thus , the derivative of @xmath25 is also given by a single spike at the position of noisy neuron , as in figure 4 ( bottom ) . second , eq . ( [ eq9 ] ) implies that , from point of view of dm , not mutual information , but another correlator , given by @xmath25 , is more relevant . function @xmath27 deviates from linear function only slightly ( figure 5b ) , and for practical purposes the distinction between the mi and @xmath25 could be ignored . however , we retain it throughout the manuscript to ensure mathematical rigor . third , when deducing ( [ eq9 ] ) we did not postulate that contributions to dm are proportional to the variance of noise . instead , we suggested that eq . ( [ eq8 ] ) implies that all units contribute equally , independently on the order in the chain . this simple qualitative statement is powerful enough to constrain our quantitative reasoning and lead to a measure of dm in form of function @xmath25 and definition ( [ eq9 ] ) . we do not know yet if the derivative of @xmath25 is proportional to the variance of noise , square root of this variance , or any other characteristic of noise in each element . all of these parameters give the same results in the uniform noise case . we need to have a difference between units to measure relative strength of their contributions . this is achieved by the next example . , is close to linear , shown by the dotted line . * c * , the new correlator @xmath25 ( top panel ) has a uniform derivative ( bottom panel ) . thus , derivative of @xmath25 is a sensible measure of decision making in the case of uniform noise . , width=288 ] , is close to linear , shown by the dotted line . * c * , the new correlator @xmath25 ( top panel ) has a uniform derivative ( bottom panel ) . thus , derivative of @xmath25 is a sensible measure of decision making in the case of uniform noise . , width=288 ] in this example the variances of noise on all neurons are the same , similarly to the previous case . however , here we amend the network definition given by ( [ eq1 ] ) . we do so for only one neuron . we assume that the link between units 5 and 6 is characterized by a very large strength @xmath28 . thus , for neuron number 6 ( figure 6 ) instead of ( [ eq1 ] ) we have @xmath29 therefore this example is the same as the previous , except that the single network connection is changed . what are the dm units in this case ? the network s output is given by @xmath30 thus , units 1 through 5 contribute equally to decision . in addition , their contributions are multiplied by a large factor @xmath31 . units 6 through 11 also contribute equally , but their contribution is much smaller than that of the former group . we conclude that units 1 through 5 are much stronger decision makers than units 6 through 11 . this conclusion is supported by the derivative of @xmath25 , as shown in figure 6 ( bottom ) . thus , changing one link in the chain produces large effect on the distribution of dm . the units downstream from the link contribute less to decisions , while the units upstream contribute a lot . what is the measure of decision making , which could differentiate these two types of units ? calculations in appendix a show that derivative of @xmath25 is proportional to @xmath32 for units 1 through 5 . this is easy to understand qualitatively , since mi increases along the chain even for negative ( @xmath33 links . this is _ not _ possible if contribution from units 1 to 5 are multiplied by @xmath31 for example . thus , an even power of @xmath31 is required , which is shown in appendix a to be @xmath32 . so far we have used definition ( [ eq9 ] ) , which is quite complex , since it involves calculation of a nonlinear function @xmath25 . is it possible to reproduce the results derived above in a simpler way ? it turns out that the role of given unit in dm is proportional to its contribution to the variability of the output @xmath34 . this leads us to an alternative to ( [ eq9 ] ) definition of dm . let us introduce the new definition using the examples , considered above . from ( [ eq11 ] ) in the ` loud ' neuron case we derive @xmath35 we could conjecture that the contributions to dm from different units are weighted proportionally to the corresponding summands in ( [ eq12 ] ) . indeed , if we assume @xmath36 @xmath37 by choosing appropriate values of variance of noise and gain , we can reproduce the results of all three of our previous examples . thus , in the case of noisy neuron the variance of noise is only present in one unit , rendering this unit decision maker , according to ( [ eq13 ] ) . in the case of uniform noise , when @xmath38 and all @xmath39 are the same , ( [ eq13 ] ) gives uniform contributions to dm . in the case of ` loud ' neuron , ( [ eq13 ] ) gives the correct factor @xmath32 describing the advantage of upstream neurons . thus , the contributions to dm are proportional to the variance of noise on given element , multiplied by the square of the gain from this element to the output . we can rewrite ( [ eq13 ] ) in a more compact form to emphasize this latter statement @xmath40 one could verify ( [ eq14 ] ) , by applying it to ( [ eq12 ] ) and obtaining relationships ( [ eq13 ] ) . this justifies ( [ eq14 ] ) in the three examples considered above . ( [ eq14 ] ) also applies to linear chains in general . in appendix a we derive ( [ eq14 ] ) from previous definition ( [ eq9 ] ) for arbitrary distribution of connection strengths and noise . thus , ( [ eq14 ] ) can be considered an alternative definition to ( [ eq9 ] ) . the equivalence between ( [ eq9 ] ) and ( [ eq14 ] ) is demonstrated graphically in figure 7 . why should one consider an alternative definition ? this is because ( [ eq9 ] ) can not be applied to networks of arbitrary connectivity , such as circuits containing loops . definition ( [ eq14 ] ) however applies to all topologies , including the linear chain examples , considered here . the bottom panel displays the derivative of @xmath25 , defined by ( [ eq9 ] ) . the derivative is numerically the same as the variance of noise . both can be used as measures of decision making . , width=288 ] let us review our findings . first , we arrived to the definition of dm activity using the information - theoretical approach ( [ eq9 ] ) . according to this definition , dm is the rate of change of correlation with decision along the chain . in other words , the _ first _ element or elements , which correlate with the decision , are the decision makers . this approach has its pros and contras . indeed , the viewpoint expressed by ( [ eq9 ] ) has a potential to be transferred to other systems , which contain non - linear elements . ( [ eq9 ] ) has an information - theoretical origin ; hence its applicability may be broader than our simple system . another advantage of ( [ eq9 ] ) is that it relies on the characteristics measurable in single - electrode recording experiments , such as response of single unit and its correlation with behavioral decision . thus , ( [ eq9 ] ) could be used experimentally . the disadvantage of the information - theoretical approach is that it is not clear how to apply it to the systems with loops , as we have mentioned above . since biological networks almost always contain loops this significantly limits the applicability of information - theoretical formula ( [ eq9 ] ) . our second step was to derive an alternative definition ( [ eq14 ] ) . the latter is _ equivalent _ to the former definition ( [ eq9 ] ) for linear - chain ( ` nematode ' ) example , as we have demonstrated on simple examples and have shown more rigorously in appendix a. the alternative definition ( [ eq14 ] ) can be understood on the basis of the following two observations . first , the example of ` noisy ' neuron shows that the variability is the source of decisions . thus , under fixed other conditions , an increase in variability and noise in a single unit leads to a larger contribution to dm from this unit . @xmath41 second , the example of ` loud ' neuron shows that not only variability and noise are important but also how much of this variability reaches the motor units . dm is hence a property of network connectivity too . thus , we arrive to the next rule the stronger is the pathway from given unit to the motor output , the larger is the contribution of this unit to dm . @xmath42 these two rules are combined into the definition ( [ eq14 ] ) . although ( [ eq14 ] ) and ( [ eq16 ] ) assume that the output element is unique , this requirement will be removed below , when we consider arbitrary topology networks . what are the features of ( [ eq14 ] ) ? it could be used for an arbitrary topology network , since it does not contain derivative along the chain , as ( [ eq9 ] ) does . definition ( [ eq14 ] ) can also be used operationally to measure the contribution of each neuron to the decision experimentally . to do that one needs to vary noise at the given unit and measure the variability of the responses . the details are discussed in section [ stimulation ] below . a special note should be made about normalization in ( [ eq14 ] ) . throughout this work we adopt the convention that dm contributions are evaluated for all units and then normalized proportionally to ( [ eq14 ] ) , so that the total sum of all contributions is equal to one ( or 100% ) . we will assume this to hold below without explicitly mentioning . finally , we give another definition of dm contributions , which could be useful when noise in the system is the same for all units . in this case the only difference between units is due to difference in their position in the network . we therefore call such quantity _ topological _ dm . @xmath43 as seen from e.g. ( [ eq12 ] ) it does not depend on the levels of noise , and can be obtained from ( [ eq14 ] ) by assuming that @xmath44 for all units . it therefore describes how strongly each elements of the circuit affects the output . this quantity is sometimes helpful in describing the network s topology . lastly , we discuss the notion of noise and variability in our approach . is this really noise , which leads networks to decisions ? not necessarily . imagine that we have studied a chain - like network ( figure 8a ) and performed the dm analysis , described above . we found that the network contains two decision makers , which are equally important . a more thorough investigation may suggest that these units are inputs from external network , which in effect is responsible for dm . for example , these hidden pathways may be inputs from other sensory modalities or regulatory inputs of other type . thus , dma may help identify entry points from other , less studied , parts of the network . our studies indicate that information - theoretical analysis [ definition ( [ eq9 ] ) ] can be further extended to tree - like topologies ( figure 9 ) . to this end we define column - vector @xmath45 such that @xmath46 . then ( [ eq9 ] ) is equivalent to @xmath47 here @xmath48 is the structure matrix defined as follows . an element @xmath49 of the structure matrix is equal to 1 if there is a connection from unit number @xmath2 to @xmath50 . matrix @xmath51 thus implements evaluating differences between connected elements in ( [ eq9 ] ) . structure matrix is related to connectivity matrix , containing network s weights through @xmath52 . connectivity matrices for some networks are shown in figures 9 and 10 . information - theoretical approach can be even further extended on the cases , when signals propagate along the network in time , therefore resulting in delays between signal and response . in this case by @xmath53 one should understand a sum of correlations over all times preceding the decision . this compensates for the presence of delays . so far there is no understanding if eq . ( [ eq18 ] ) [ or ( [ eq9 ] ) ] can be used for topologies other than trees . definition ( [ eq14 ] ) , however , can be used with networks of arbitrary connectivity . this is the topic of the next section . all previous examples , except the one mentioned at the end of the last session , were static , i.e. variables did not depend on time . the deficiency of this approach is that it is not clear how to treat networks with loops . to apply our analysis to the cases with loops , and , in general , to networks with _ arbitrary _ connectivity ( figure 10 ) , we consider time - dependent models here . this allows us to observe propagation of noise around the loop explicitly and to make accurate conclusions about contributions to dm . we limit ourselves to linear dynamical systems , where the single nonlinear element is the last one , transforming an analog system output to a binary response . as the first step we consider temporal dynamics in the discrete - time approximation , which contains all essential features of our approach . later in the section we extend discrete model to the continuous - time case and show their equivalence . in this section we consider a system of @xmath54 elements , whose activity at each instant is described by an @xmath54-dimensional column - vector @xmath55 . time has discrete values separated by an interval @xmath56 . therefore this model is called the discrete - time model . the values of activity at two neighboring time - slices are related by the connection matrix @xmath57 @xmath58 here @xmath59 is the vector describing noise added to activity vector on each time - slice . the variable @xmath60 describes sensory input into the system . the rules of temporal evolution of activities described by this equation are general enough to include almost all interesting phenomena and mimic modeling of real systems on digital computers . in appendix b we will prove that this model is equivalent to systems with continuously defined time . noise is specified by the parameter @xmath59 , which has a zero mean and is defined by the correlation matrix @xmath61 we assume here that neighboring in time values on noise are not correlated , implying that we consider a system with white noise . this assumption can be easily relaxed and is used here to simplify the analysis . it becomes rigorously valid when time - interval @xmath56 is longer than the correlation time of noise . further , if noise is specific to each neuron , the same - time correlation matrix @xmath62 is diagonal @xmath63 this takes place i.e. when stochasticity is induced by probabilistic nature of synaptic vesicle release , in which case every two neurons receive uncorrelated fluctuating inputs . some time after presentation of the stimulus [ @xmath64 the system is forced to make a decision through the following process first , a scalar quantity @xmath65 is evaluated . here time corresponds to the instant , when the choice is to be made . the output metrics vector @xmath66 describes the way in which system s activity affects motor response . in the simplest case , which was considered in the previous section , when a single element number @xmath20 evokes responses , @xmath67 . in a more complex situation , when multiple areas / neurons have direct influence on decision , vector @xmath66 has more than one non - zero element . on the second step , decision is made based on the sign of @xmath68 @xmath69 thus , this model describes a two - alternative forced - choice task . our system is completely defined by the following set of parameters : @xmath70 , @xmath60 , @xmath62 , and @xmath66 . as we have shown in the previous section , the presence of the stimulus is not required to define dm elements [ eq . ( [ eq5 ] ) ] . we therefore set @xmath60 to zero and are left with three parameters @xmath57 , @xmath62 , and @xmath66 . we now are ready to determine dm elements in our simple model . to find decision makers we will use eq . ( [ eq14 ] ) . in this case it becomes @xmath71 therefore , we need to evaluate the variability on the output from the system @xmath72 . this is accomplished if we notice that @xmath73 and @xmath74 here we introduced the cross - correlation matrix defined as follows @xmath75 we replace here the time variable by the integers , specifying the time - slice number . the averaging in ( [ eq25 ] ) and ( [ eq26 ] ) is assumed over different instantiations of noise ( trials ) . due to the properties of noise in our model , this correlator does not depend on the absolute values of time ( @xmath20 and @xmath76 , but only on the difference ( @xmath77 . as follows from ( [ eq25 ] ) , of particular interest is the same - time correlator @xmath78 , which determines fluctuations in @xmath68 . we now derive equation for same - time correlator @xmath79 . using ( [ eq19 ] ) we obtain @xmath80\left [ { \vec { x}^t(n)\hat { c}^t+\vec { \eta } ^t(n ) } \right ] } \\ \end{array}\ ] ] we then notice that the correlator @xmath81 is identically zero , since @xmath82 is a linear combination of values of noise at times @xmath83 [ see eq . ( [ eq19 ] ) ] . we thus deduce from eq . ( [ eq27 ] ) that @xmath84 which leads us , finally , to @xmath85 this equation allows us to determine the same - time correlator @xmath79 from connectivity and noise cross - correlogram , defined in ( [ eq20 ] ) , which is a diagonal matrix . we would like to pause here and describe the properties of this equation . first of all , in the most generic case ( [ eq28 ] ) allows us to determine @xmath86 from @xmath57 and @xmath62 uniquely . indeed , ( [ eq28 ] ) is a system of @xmath87 linear equations for @xmath87 unknowns @xmath79 , arranged in the matrix form . hence , this system , in most cases , can be solved uniquely . on the other hand , with one exception , @xmath79 can not be expressed explicitly in terms of matrices @xmath57 and @xmath88 . thus , one has to either appeal to the representation of @xmath79 in terms of eigenvectors and eigenvalues of @xmath57 , or use computer to arrange elements of matrix @xmath79 in vector form and solve resulting linear system . the contribution to dm from a given element can be determined from eq . ( [ eq25 ] ) @xmath89 the topological dm contributions are @xmath90 using eqs . ( [ eq28 ] ) and ( [ eq29 ] ) one can analyze a variety of network connectivities . some new effect emerging for non - tree systems are described next . we now consider network shown in figure 11a , in which all elements have the same variance of noise and all connections have unitary strength . figure 11a shows two pathways from unit * 2 * to the exit unit , * 6*. the resulting network gain from unit * 2 * to unit * 6 * is thus equal to two . all other units gain at the exit is one . the contribution to dm from unit * 2 * is thus four times larger that from other units . this is because noise at this unit is multiplied by a factor of two , and the variance of noise , by a factor of four . we conclude that there may be some special elements in network , which occupy hub - like positions , gaining large influence due to abundance of their outputs . it should be noted that fan - in hubs are not special from the point of view of dm in any way . let us now examine the network with a loop . figure 11b shows such an example with unitary link strength and uniform noise variance , as in previous case . the presence of loop affects dm drastically : our discrete - time model marks units belonging to the loop as decision makers ) and ( [ eq29 ] ) does not have a valid solution for the loop with all connection equal to unity . one needs to set one of the connection as a parameter , @xmath91 , solve the equations , and consider the limit @xmath92 . this is easy to understand , since noise , generated by each unit on each time - step , can not leave the loop and , therefore , builds up there without limits . therefore the variance of noise in the output of element number three grows proportionally to time @xmath93 ^ 2 } = \overline { \eta ^2 } t\to \infty $ ] . here averaging is assumed over instantiations of noise ( trials ) . thus , loop becomes the crucial decision maker . this case is somewhat analogous to our previous ` noisy ' neuron example . what is the possible role of loops in biological networks ? why would one introduce such unreliable components ? loops , similar to shown in figure 11b , have many useful properties . for instance , they can act as parametric memory systems . imagine that responses of all units in the loop have the same values , equal to @xmath94 . this could be accomplished by manipulating the sensory inputs . assume that no more inputs are received from the outside of the system . it follows that , in the absence of noise on each element , this value of response will reverberate around the loop forever . this is because all links have unitary strength . loops can thus memorize a graded value , such as @xmath94 , functioning as parametric memory elements . suppose , in addition , that a non - zero input @xmath95 is applied to element number * 1 * at all times . since this element acts as a summator , its response on the next step is @xmath96 . the signal @xmath95 propagates around the loop , and in four steps it reaches the first element again , at which time its response is @xmath97 . in four more steps @xmath98 . thus , not only noise , but also signal can build up in the system . therefore , a loop can operate as a temporal integrator . the integration is not perfect if one of the links has a non - unitary strength , in which case integrator becomes leaky ( robinson , 1989 ) . temporal integrators play special role in dm , since they act as accumulators of sensory information , which puts them into special position with respect to other areas ( gold and shadlen , 2002 ) . as an example , such is area lip in primate visual cortex , which is involved in dm in direction - discrimination task ( shadlen and newsome , 2001 ; roitman and shadlen , 2002 ; mazurek et al . , 2003 ) . we finally consider a model , in which time runs continuously . this model has potential relevance to real - life networks . the responses of units satisfy the following equation @xmath99 the network connectivity matrix @xmath100 can be related to connection matrix from the discrete - time model in ( [ eq19 ] ) through @xmath101 ( see appendix b ) . noise is defined by its cross - correlation @xmath102 where @xmath103 is a diagonal cross - correlogram of noise . ( [ eq31])-([eq33 ] ) are analogous to the discrete - time case ( [ eq19])-([eq21 ] ) . similarly , we define the output scalar and the decision variable @xmath104 @xmath105 here @xmath106 is time when the system makes the decision . our model is thus defined by eqs . ( [ eq31])-([eq34 ] ) . we will now use definition ( [ eq29 ] ) to find decision makers . as in discrete - time case we need to know the variance of the output variable , @xmath72 , after which ( [ eq29 ] ) leads to @xmath107 important for us is the time - dependent correlator @xmath108 which we now evaluate . solution of ( [ eq31 ] ) is obtained using matrix exponentials @xmath109}\ ] ] if external stimulus is zero or a constant in time , due to ( [ eq5 ] ) , the correlator at @xmath110 @xmath111 we seek @xmath112 in the form @xmath113 where @xmath79 is equal - time cross - correlation . to find equation for @xmath79 we differentiate ( [ eq38 ] ) as follows @xmath114 we arrive thus to the following equation for @xmath79 @xmath115 this equation is the central tool for the continuous - time theory . the contributions to dm from each unit are found by differentiating @xmath116 with respect to noise , as in eq . ( [ eq29 ] ) @xmath117 once the same - time correlation matrix @xmath79 is found from eq . ( [ eq41 ] ) , cross - correlation for arbitrary time is @xmath118 this equation suggests a helpful strategy for determining noise matrix @xmath119 . indeed , ( [ eq41 ] ) and ( [ eq43 ] ) imply that @xmath120 here @xmath121 is infinitesimally small positive number . in other words , noise matrix is equal to discontinuity in time - derivative of cross - correlation at @xmath122 . since noise correlation matrix is diagonal , the non - zero elements are @xmath123 two comments are in order here . first , noise term @xmath59 plays the role of input noise in ( [ eq31 ] ) . it can not be measured directly . equation ( [ eq44 ] ) provides a way to single it out . second , ( [ eq44 ] ) does not apply to the discrete - time model . indeed , in the latter we either have @xmath122 , or @xmath124 , etc . , i.e. the condition @xmath125 with @xmath121 infinitesimally small is hard to enforce . it may happen that @xmath126 is acceptable due to presence of slow components in the circuit , such as temporal integrators . however , in general case ( [ eq44 ] ) can not be applied to the discrete - time case . for instance , it fails dramatically for the case of ` nematode ' chain considered above . equations ( [ eq41 ] ) , ( [ eq42 ] ) , and ( [ eq44 ] ) represent a useful set of tools to find dm components for various connectivities . we present here two possible cases , in which decision makers can be found . they differ in what is known about the system . assume we know the network connectivity @xmath100 , output metrics vector @xmath66 , and autocorrelation for each unit @xmath127 . the steps below allow finding the decision makers . 1 . since noise matrix is diagonal , as per ( [ eq33 ] ) , it can be found from autocorrelation using ( [ eq44 ] ) . 2 . solving ( [ eq41 ] ) allows determining @xmath128 , the derivative of equal - time crosscorrelation with respect to noise in each element . decision makers are found from ( [ eq42 ] ) . 4 . normalize contributions to dm so that @xmath129 . scenario 1 does not require simultaneous measurements from all units . it requires the knowledge of the network connectivity however . the next scenario is complimentary in this respect . suppose we have measured the full crosscorrelation matrix @xmath112 by simultaneous recordings from all units . suppose also that we know how the output of the system is evaluated ( vector @xmath130 . these are the steps to determine dm units . 1 . use ( [ eq44 ] ) to find noise matrix @xmath62 . 2 . use ( [ eq41 ] ) to find the connection matrix @xmath100 . 3 . solve ( [ eq41 ] ) to calculate @xmath128 for each element . 4 . use ( [ eq42 ] ) to find decision makers . normalize contributions to dm so that @xmath129 . both scenarios use extensive knowledge about the system , which renders them useless in experimental conditions . in the next subsection we discuss a way to bypass these limitations . finally , we would like to provide solution to ( [ eq41 ] ) using eigenbasis of matrix @xmath100 . since @xmath100 is not necessarily symmetric , a distinction should be made between right and left eigenvectors . the latter turn out to be useful for our purposes . they are defined by @xmath131 here and below greek indexes denote numbers of eigenvalues , while latin ones label spatial components of vectors and matrices . solution of ( [ eq41 ] ) is @xmath132 where @xmath133 is the gram matrix of eigenvectors . ( [ eq46_5 ] ) is valid if the eigenvectors form a complete basis in the @xmath54-dimensional space . as follows from ( [ eq46_5 ] ) , eigenvalues of @xmath100 with small real part contribute to dm in a large degree . this justifies the use of principal component analysis when such eigenvalues are present . an example of such principal component is the temporal integrator loop in figure 11b , which has vanishing @xmath134 . in case if matrix @xmath100 is symmetric , its eigenvalues are real and eigenvectors are orthogonal . this leads to a unit gram matrix . then , eq . ( 3.29 ) becomes more compact @xmath135 similar equations , called kubo formulas , are obtained for various correlators in case of diffusion of particles in random media ( efetov , 1997 ) . the distinguishing feature of ( [ eq48 ] ) is that a product of four eigenvectors enters the expression . thus , propagation of noise in this case can be accompanied by interference between different pathways . an example of destructive interference of this kind is given below , in section [ stimulation ] . ( [ eq48 ] ) can be further simplified . indeed , our model uses diagonal noise matrices , i.e. @xmath136 in ( [ eq48 ] ) . suppose also that the output from the network occurs through one exit element number @xmath2 , which is specified by taking @xmath137 . in this case the use of eq . ( [ eq42 ] ) gives @xmath138 from this equation we conclude that for element @xmath20 to contribute to dm , an eigenvector should exist , which is non - zero on both unit number @xmath20 and exit unit @xmath2 . thus , we conclude that eigenvectors of @xmath100 should be delocalized for broader impact of elements on the decision . this is not surprising in view of the mentioned analogy with the diffusion problem . in case if matrix @xmath100 is not symmetric , the gram matrix may be non - diagonal and ( [ eq49 ] ) can not be used . however , the off - diagonal elements of @xmath139 are usually smaller than diagonal ones , due to uncorrelated sign changes , when ( [ eq47 ] ) is computed with @xmath140 . therefore , ( [ eq49 ] ) may apply approximately . stimulations with electric current add a new degree of freedom to dma , thus leading to more effective ways of finding decision makers . there are two great advantages of the stimulation method . first , it only involves stimulation of a single neuron , therefore no simultaneous multiple - electrode measurements are required . second , the knowledge of network connectivity is not needed to solve the problem . in this section we study our simple networks and find what stimulation strategies are consistent with our earlier definitions , such as eq . ( [ eq14 ] ) . we will use continuous model for concreteness ( section [ continuous ] ) . consider the output variable @xmath68 . it is a linear function of the inputs . it is also a function , which contains noise components , variable from trial to trial . the noise components were acquired from all units in different degree . since noise in each unit is gaussian , the output variable is described by gaussian distribution too @xmath141 in each trial a random value of @xmath68 is obtained , according to distribution ( [ eq50 ] ) . the response of the system is equal to 1 if @xmath68 is positive , and 0 otherwise . the probability to obtain response equal to 1 to given stimulus @xmath95 is given by the error function ( abramowitz and stegun , 1972 ) @xmath142,\ ] ] whereas the probability of zero response is @xmath143.\ ] ] both probabilities depend upon the mean response to stimulus @xmath144 and the standard deviation @xmath145 . therefore the electric stimulation strategies may be based on affecting either the former or the latter . we now consider both of these strategies and show that affecting the mean response may provide misleading results , while changing the variance of response allows estimating contributions to dm consistently with our previous definitions . thus , strategies of stimulation based on standard deviation of the output variable are _ always _ correct in our simple model , independently on the topology of the network . this may seem a trivial consequence of definition ( [ eq14 ] ) , but we will discuss it here for the sake of comparison of two strategies and optimizing them . we start with the strategies of stimulation , which affect the mean response @xmath144 . in our simple model this may be accomplished by injecting a tonic input current into a unit number @xmath2 . mathematically it is accomplished by adding extra stimulus @xmath146 to this unit in eq . ( [ eq31 ] ) . note that in biological systems the stimulating current is alternating with constant amplitude ( salzman et al . , 1992 ) . the mean response is shifted by the stimulation , i.e. @xmath147 where @xmath146 is the magnitude of injected tonic current . this leads to observable changes in the probability @xmath148 @xmath149 here @xmath150 is the change in probability of correct responses after unit number @xmath2 is electrically stimulated . can @xmath150 be a measure of dm ? we notice that @xmath150 can be either positive or negative . this depends on the sign of derivative @xmath151 , which is positive for excitatory pathway from unit @xmath2 to the output and negative for inhibitory pathway . since contribution to dm ought to be positive , we can not assume simply that @xmath152 . the correct expression , which we provide here without derivation is @xmath153 ^ 2.\ ] ] this equation is understood in proportional sense , since @xmath154 should be normalized to ensure that @xmath155 . our investigations show that this expression is accurate for trees and is consistent with both our earlier definitions ( [ eq9 ] ) or ( [ eq14 ] ) . remarkably , it employs quantities , which can be measured in a single - electrode experiment . indeed , the amplitude of noise @xmath6 can be found from autocorrelation of unit s response , using ( [ eq44 ] ) ; and @xmath150 is determined from behavioral changes in response to single - unit stimulation . this equation thus provides an approach potentially useful in practice . does this relationship work for networks of arbitrary connectivity ? figure 12b shows a counterexample , in which a unit is stimulated , which results in _ no _ change in probability of correct response ( we consider trials in which 1 is the correct response throughout this section ) . this is because there are two pathways , leading from this unit to the exit , one positive and one negative . they have equal strength , and , therefore , compensate each other . on the other hand , unit number one _ does _ participate is dm , because if a non - stationary stimulation / stimulus is applied , its effect on the decision is not zero . thus , ( [ eq54 ] ) and tonic stimulation method can not be applied to arbitrary circuits , such as shown in figure 12b , to accurately reveal decision makers . . , width=288 ] . , width=288 ] is there a stimulation method for finding decision making components in arbitrary networks ? the method follows directly from the definition ( [ eq14 ] ) [ or ( [ eq35 ] ) , which is equivalent ] . indeed , when stimulating current is a temporal white noise , the output variable @xmath68 acquires a larger variance ( figure 12c ) . hence , the derivative of output variance , entering ( [ eq35 ] ) can be calculated operationally , by injecting a distracter current . more precisely , if the variance of stimulating current applied to unit @xmath2 is @xmath156 the derivative entering definition ( [ eq35 ] ) is @xmath157 in practice one has no access to the variable @xmath68 , so one can not measure directly the change in variance @xmath158 . instead , one could measure the change in the probability of correct responses under the influence of distracting current . indeed , from ( [ eq50_5 ] ) we obtain @xmath159 combining the last two equations we obtain for the important derivative @xmath160 since the probability of correct responses always decreases under the influence of distracters , the derivative @xmath161 is a negative constant . it is the same for all units . we arrive therefore to the expression for contributions to dm , which follows from ( [ eq35 ] ) @xmath162 here @xmath150 is the decrease in probability of correct responses produced by electric stimulation with variance of the random current equal to @xmath156 . the variance of noise on each unit @xmath163 can be found from autocorrelation using ( [ eq45 ] ) . this procedure works for any topology in our simplified model . it should be noted here that if noise is not entirely white or can not be considered white , ( [ eq45 ] ) can not be used directly and should be replaced by an expression reflecting the spectral characteristics of noise appropriate for the system under investigation . thus , if noise is provided by other parts of the network , its dynamic features may be more complex . therefore , ( [ eq45 ] ) may not apply directly to the ` hidden pathway ' example given in the end of section [ conclusions ] . the procedure , which we just described , permits further optimization . indeed , imagine that the probability of correct responses is exactly @xmath164 . adding distracting stimulation current will not change this probability , i.e. @xmath165 no matter what unit is stimulated . in the opposite limiting case when @xmath166 , the effect of distracter on performance is exponentially small . hence , behavioral response to stimulation has an optimum between @xmath167 and @xmath168 . to find the optimum we observe from ( [ eq56 ] ) that @xmath169 is maximum for the same variation in @xmath170 when @xmath171 is maximum . we therefore plot the latter derivative as a function of @xmath148 in figure 12d . we indeed observe a maximum at the value of probability of correct responses close to @xmath172 to summarize , the following scenario describes algorithm for finding contributions to dm using random stimulation . assume that we _ do not know _ the network connectivity @xmath100 and output metrics vector @xmath66 ; but we know autocorrelation for each unit @xmath127 . the steps below allow finding the decision makers . 1 . prepare stimulus so that the probability of correct responses is close to the value given by ( [ eq59 ] ) . 2 . stimulate one unit with random current , whose variance is @xmath156 , and measure the decrease in probability of correct responses @xmath169 . 3 . record autocorrelation and evaluate noise variance @xmath6 for this unit using ( [ eq45 ] ) . 4 . find contribution to dm for this unit using equation ( [ eq58 ] ) . repeat steps 1 through 4 for all units in the system . normalize contributions to dm so that @xmath129 . in this work we defined decision makers in networks , which behave in a well - defined fashion . as with any definition , there is certain degree of arbitrariness in our study , since this is the first mathematical study of this sort . we had to make choices about the features of decision making we were attempting to describe as well as about the way they were quantified . we demonstrated these features in a set of examples . future studies will show if these features can be used as a basis of a more complete model - independent theory . in this study we postulated that variability and noise , causally linked to decisions , are the chief descriptors of dm . although this point may seem paradoxical we suggest three arguments in its favor . first , variability may reflect additional information needed to make a decision in case of uncertainty . such may be inputs from other modalities , memories , or some other relevant modulatory inputs , supplying e.g. emotional condition of the subject or changing utility values ( figure 8) . second , many behaviors , such as c - start escape responses in fish ( eaton and emberley , 1991 ) and other organisms ( glimcher , 2003 ) , have stochastic character . this makes the task of pursuer more difficult . such unpredictable behaviors are reproduced in our model if the sensory input is weak or in the small signal - to - noise ratio case . third , the goal of dm is to dissipate sensory information , as suggested in the introduction ( figure 1a ) , whereby an analog multi - dimensional stimulus space is reduced to a discrete space of several decisions . we argue that this transformation is facilitated by noise . we have studied the problem of finding decision making units in networks of various connectivities . this path took us from simple linear chains , for which the information - theoretical ( it ) approach was found to be effective , to trees , and , finally to an alternative definition of decision makers , based on propagation of noise in networks . this latter definition is valid in networks of arbitrary topology . all these approaches are equivalent , when they can be compared , but include progressively broader classes of networks . as a practical application for the alternative definition we considered the problem of electric stimulation in the surrogate networks and showed a way of determining dm contributions for arbitrary networks using stimulation with random current . our findings are summarized in figures 13 and 14 . although we studied networks of complex connectivity , the model describing a single network element was quite simple . not all of the units are linear , of course , since dm is a non - linear task ( figure 1a ) . however , our model is essentially based on linear elements . the motivation for this model is that it is easy to analyze . the study of simple models is a necessary step before analysis proceeds any further . once the methodological issues are resolved for simpler models , complex non - linear systems can be studied in the same paradigm . one of important questions resolved here is that a completely linear element can be a decision maker , despite the presence of non - linear units in the network . thus , nonlinearity is not a necessary attribute of dm . this question would be impossible to answer for more realistic system , since in practice all units contain nonlinearities . decision making task , as formulated in figure 1a , is similar to general object discrimination task . representation of motor response in our model is not distinguishable mathematically from the representation of abstract object / decision category ( horwitz and newsome , 1998 ; shadlen and newsome , 2001 ) . the latter does not necessarily lead to a motor command . thus , our analysis may uncover the identities of units responsible for categorization of sensory inputs . in terms of this analysis we emphasize the distinction between units representing the object category and the units in which this representation is actually formed . the former are analogous to motor units in the decision task , while the latter are similar to decision makers . as follows from this study , the analysis is dependent upon the topology of the network involved . for simple linear sensory chains our conclusion is that the _ first _ unit , spatially or temporally , in which the representation of the object is correlated with final outcome of the discrimination process , is responsible for casting the stimulus in one of the abstract classes . in case of recurrent networks a more detailed quantitative analysis is needed to draw conclusions about identities of categorizing units . thus , dma may find a broader use in identifying units representing abstract object s percepts . a special care should be taken in distinguishing the dm task from the sensory discrimination task . it may occur that in the same experiment these tasks are performed by different populations of neurons . an example is given by ( salinas and romo , 1998 ) . they discovered a population of m1 neurons responding differentially to two categories of tactile stimuli . some of these neurons did not respond , when the same behavior was guided by visual cues . this observation is consistent with these neurons performing sensory discrimination of tactile stimuli , while some other population making decisions about the actual motor response . our mathematical analysis is general enough to include both of these functions . thus , if correlations with motor response are studied , it will result in the decision makers ; while when the correlations with percepts are investigated , dma should provide the identities of discriminating elements . we suggest that dma may be relevant to other biological systems . possible applications may include the analysis of molecular networks , such as genetic regulatory or protein binding networks ; finding decision makers in compartmental models of dentritic trees ( poirazi and mel , 2001 ) ; studies of neural networks and structural networks of connectivities between different brain areas ; and analysis of social networks . in this study we define network elements responsible for making decisions . we obtain two equivalent definitions . according to one , decisions are made by elements , in which correlations with the decision are first formed . according to the second definition , decision making activity is measured by the impact of variability in given unit on the response . we give examples of network motifs , especially potent from decision making prospective , such as fan - out hubs and recurrent loops . the latter can function as temporal integrators of sensory inputs . we also study how electric stimulations can reveal decision making components . we conclude that stimulations with time - varying random current produce correct results for all network topologies . here we solve a more general version of linear chain model than considered in the text . the responses of neighboring neurons are related linearly @xmath173 this is a generalization of ( [ eq1 ] ) . the response of the @xmath20th unit is @xmath174 where coefficients @xmath175 , @xmath176 . the external signal @xmath177 is assumed to be zero in this appendix , due to ( [ eq5 ] ) . for the last element in the chain we have @xmath178 comparing ( [ eqa2 ] ) and ( [ eqa3 ] ) we conclude that @xmath179 where @xmath180 is a variable , which describes noise in the networks downstream from unit @xmath20 . it is , thus , uncorrelated with @xmath181 . this is where tree - like topology enters our solution , since in case of loops , @xmath181 and @xmath180 are correlated . our goal now is to calculate mi between the decision variable @xmath182 and @xmath181 . we will use the definition for mi @xmath183 } } \label{eqa6}\ ] ] here @xmath184 , since there is no signal ; @xmath185 and @xmath186 . \label{eqa9}\ ] ] the upper / lower sign is assumed for @xmath187 or @xmath168 in ( [ eqa9 ] ) ; @xmath188 is the standard deviation of gaussian variable @xmath180 defined in ( [ eqa4 ] ) . the expression for mi ( [ eqa6 ] ) results in @xmath189 } \log _ 2 \left [ { 1+\mbox{erf}\left ( { zs_n } \right ) } \right ] \\ s_n = \sigma ( \alpha _ { nn } x_n ) /\sigma \\ \end{array } \label{eqa11}\ ] ] mi is therefore a function of signal - to - noise ratio @xmath190 . inversely , @xmath191 ^ 2 \label{eqa12}\ ] ] on the other hand , ( [ eqa4 ] ) leads to @xmath192 solving ( [ eqa12 ] ) and ( [ eqa13 ] ) with respect to @xmath193 we have @xmath194 ^ 2}{1+\left [ { m^{-1}(mi_n ) } \right]^2}\equiv f(mi_n ) \label{eqa14}\ ] ] function @xmath195 here is inverse to @xmath196 defined in ( [ eqa11 ] ) . function @xmath25 numerically calculated from ( [ eqa11 ] ) and ( [ eqa14 ] ) is shown in figure 5 . lastly , we recall that variances @xmath197 are related to the strength of noise @xmath6 through ( [ eqa2 ] ) . we have @xmath198 eqs . ( [ eqa14 ] ) and ( [ eqa15 ] ) are used below to prove a variety of statements about function @xmath25 used in the main text . in this case @xmath199 , and , consequently , @xmath200 . noise variance is the same on every node , i.e. @xmath201 . as follows from ( [ eqa15 ] ) @xmath202 , which results in @xmath203 it follows that contributions to dm defined by ( [ eq9 ] ) are the same for all units . in this case @xmath204 , while @xmath205 , assuming that the link from unit @xmath206 to @xmath207 is strengthened . in the example in the text @xmath208 [ cf . ( [ eq10 ] ) ] . eq . ( [ eqa15 ] ) leads us to the values for variances of responses @xmath209 applying ( [ eqa14 ] ) we obtain the expression for @xmath25 @xmath210 which is a piece - wise linear function of @xmath20 . ( [ eq9 ] ) determines contributions to dm as @xmath211 this confirms that the upstream units ( @xmath212 are @xmath32 times more potent than the downstream ones ( @xmath213 . let us start by determining decision makers from definition ( [ eq14 ] ) . according to ( [ eqa3 ] ) @xmath214 definition ( [ eq14 ] ) gives @xmath215 after normalization we obtain @xmath216 let us derive the same result from ( [ eq9 ] ) . as follows from ( [ eqa14 ] ) @xmath217 this proves the equivalence of ( [ eq9 ] ) and ( [ eq14 ] ) , since the result is identical to ( [ eqa22 ] ) . in this section we show that the discrete - time model can be derived from continuous - time model . starting from equation ( [ eq37 ] ) for the unit responses in the continuous case we obtain the relation for solutions at two different time points separated by the time - interval @xmath218 , analogous to ( [ eq19 ] ) in the discrete - time description . then we show that in the limiting case @xmath219 two descriptions are equivalent . from ( [ eq37 ] ) we obtain @xmath220 this equation can be rewritten as @xmath221 , where @xmath222 thus it has the same form as ( [ eq19 ] ) . using ( [ eq32 ] ) we obtain that the new noise cross - correlation matrix @xmath223 the solution of the continuous - time problem satisfies the equations of the discrete - time model for an arbitrarily large time interval @xmath56 , but the new noise cross - correlation matrix @xmath224 is non - diagonal in this case . in the limiting case @xmath219 it becomes diagonal . indeed ( [ eqb3 ] ) implies that in this limit @xmath225 which is diagonal by the definition of the continuous - time model . here we kept only terms linear in @xmath56 . thus , in this limit the matrix @xmath224 is diagonal as needed in our formulation of discrete - time model . one can also derive ( [ eq41 ] ) from ( [ eq28 ] ) using ( [ eqb2 ] ) and ( [ eqb4 ] ) and taking the limit @xmath219 . Abstract:
[ "neural circuits often face the problem of classifying stimuli into discrete groups and making decisions based on such classifications . neurons of these circuits can be distinguished according to their correlations with different features of stimulus or response , which allows defining sensory or motor neuronal types . in this study we define the third class of neurons , which is responsible for making decision . we suggest two descriptions for contribution of units to decision making : first , as a spatial derivative of correlations between neural activity and the decision ; second , as an impact of variability in a given neuron on the response . these two definitions are shown to be equivalent , when they can be compared . we also suggest an experimental strategy for determining contributions to decision making , which uses electric stimulation with time- varying random current ." ]
12,464
12,464
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the yee scheme ( also known as finite - difference time - domain , or fdtd ) was introduced in @xcite and remains one of the most successful numerical methods used in the field of computational electromagnetics , particularly in the area of microwave problems . although it is not a `` high - order '' method , it is still preferred for many applications because it preserves important structural features of maxwell s equations that other methods fail to capture . among these distinguishing attributes are that the gauss constraint @xmath1 is exactly conserved in a discrete sense , and electrostatic solutions of the form @xmath2 indeed remain stationary in time ( see * ? ? ? * ) . in this paper , we show that these desirable properties are direct consequences of the variational and discrete differential structure of the yee scheme , which mirrors the geometry of maxwell s equations . moreover , we will show how to construct other variational methods that , as a result , share these same numerical properties , while at the same time applying to more general domains . geometric numerical integrators have been used primarily for the simulation of classical mechanical systems , where features such as symplecticity , conservation of momentum , and conservation of energy are essential . ( for a survey of various methods and applications , see @xcite . ) among these , _ variational integrators _ are developed by discretizing the lagrangian variational principle of a system , and then requiring that numerical trajectories satisfy a discrete version of hamilton s stationary - action principle . these methods are automatically symplectic , and they exactly preserve discrete momenta associated to symmetries of the lagrangian : for instance , systems with translational invariance will conserve a discrete linear momentum , those with rotational invariance will conserve a discrete angular momentum , etc . in addition , variational integrators can be seen to display good long - time energy behavior , without artificial numerical damping ( see * ? ? ? * for a comprehensive overview of key results ) . this variational approach was extended to discretizing general multisymplectic field theories , with an application to nonlinear wave equations , in @xcite and @xcite , which developed the multisymplectic approach for continuum mechanics . building on this work , @xcite introduced _ asynchronous variational integrators _ ( avis ) , with which it becomes possible to choose a different time step size for each element of the spatial mesh , while still preserving the same variational and geometric structure as uniform - time - stepping schemes . these methods were implemented and shown to be not only practical , but in many cases superior to existing methods for problems such as nonlinear elastodynamics . some further developments are given in @xcite . while there have been attempts to apply the existing avi theory to computational electromagnetics , these efforts encountered a fundamental obstacle . the key symmetry of maxwell s equations is not rotational or translational symmetry , as in mechanics , but a _ differential gauge symmetry_. without taking additional care to preserve this gauge structure , even variational integrators can not be expected to capture the geometry of maxwell s equations . as will be explained , we overcome this obstacle by combining variational methods with discrete differential forms and operators . this differential / gauge structure also turns out to be important for the numerical performance of the method , and is one of the hallmarks of the yee scheme . as motivation , consider the basic relation @xmath3 , where @xmath4 is the magnetic flux and @xmath5 is the magnetic vector potential . because of the vector calculus identities @xmath6 and @xmath7 , this equation has two immediate and important consequences . first , @xmath4 is automatically divergence - free . second , any transformation @xmath8 has no effect on @xmath4 ; this describes a gauge symmetry , for which the associated conserved momentum is @xmath9 ( which must be zero by gauss law ) . a similar argument also explains the invariance of electrostatic solutions , since @xmath10 is curl - free and invariant under constant shifts in the scalar potential @xmath11 . therefore , a proper variational integrator for electromagnetism should also preserve a discrete analog of these differential identities . this can be done by viewing the objects of electromagnetism not as vector fields , but as _ differential forms _ in @xmath0-dimensional spacetime , as is typically done in the literature on classical field theory . using a discrete exterior calculus ( called dec ) as the framework to discretize these differential forms , we find that the resulting variational integrators automatically respect discrete differential identities such as @xmath12 ( which encapsulates the previous div - curl - grad relations ) and stokes theorem . consequently , they also respect the gauge symmetry of maxwell s equations , and therefore preserve the associated discrete momentum . the yee scheme , as we will show , is a method of precisely this type , which gives a new explanation for many of its previously observed _ a posteriori _ numerical qualities . for instance , one of its notable features is that the electric field @xmath13 and magnetic field @xmath14 do not live at the same discrete space or time locations , but at separate nodes on a staggered lattice . the reason why this particular setup leads to improved numerics is not obvious : if we view @xmath13 and @xmath14 simply as vector fields in @xmath15-space the exact same type of mathematical object why should nt they live at the same points ? indeed , many finite element method ( fem ) approaches do exactly this , resulting in a `` nodal '' discretization . however , from the perspective of differential forms in spacetime , it becomes clear that the staggered - grid approach is more faithful to the structure of maxwell s equations : as we will see , @xmath13 and @xmath14 come from objects that are dual to one another ( the spacetime forms @xmath16 and @xmath17 ) , and hence they naturally live on two staggered , dual meshes . the argument for this approach is not merely a matter of theoretical interest : the geometry of maxwell s equations has important practical implications for numerical performance . for instance , the vector - field - based discretization , used in nodal fem , results in spurious @xmath15-d artifacts due to its failure to respect the underlying geometric structure . the yee scheme , on the other hand , produces resonance spectra in agreement with theory , without spurious modes ( see * ? ? ? * ) . furthermore , it has been shown in @xcite that staggered - grid methods can be used to develop fast numerical methods for electromagnetism , even for problems in heterogeneous media with highly discontinuous material parameters such as conductivity and permeability . by developing a structure - preserving , geometric discretization of maxwell s equations , not only can we better understand the yee scheme and its characteristic advantages , but we can also construct more general methods that share its desirable properties . this family of methods includes the `` yee - like '' scheme of @xcite , which presented the first extension of yee s scheme to unstructured grids ( e.g. , simplicial meshes rather than rectangular lattices ) . general methods like these are highly desirable : rectangular meshes are not always practical or appropriate to use in applications where domains with curved and oblique boundaries are needed ( see , for instance * ? ? ? * ) . by allowing general discretizations while still preserving geometry , one can combine the best attributes of the fem and yee schemes . using dec as a structure - preserving , geometric framework for general discrete meshes , we have obtained the following results : 1 . the yee scheme is actually a variational integrator : that is , it can be obtained by applying hamilton s principle of stationary action to a discrete lagrangian . 2 . consequently , the yee scheme is _ multisymplectic _ and _ preserves discrete momentum maps _ ( i.e. , conserved quantities analogous to the continuous case of electromagnetism ) . in particular , the gauss constraint is understood as a discrete momentum map of this integrator , while the preservation of electrostatic potential solutions corresponds to the identity @xmath18 , where @xmath19 is the discrete exterior derivative operator . we also create a foundation for more general schemes , allowing _ arbitrary discretizations of spacetime _ , not just uniform time steps on a spatial mesh . one such scheme , introduced here , is a new asynchronous variational integrator ( avi ) for maxwell s equations , where each spatial element is assigned its own time step size and evolves `` asynchronously '' with its neighbors . this means that one can choose to take small steps where greater refinement is needed , while still using larger steps for other elements . since refining one part of the mesh does not restrict the time steps taken elsewhere , an avi can be computationally efficient and numerically stable with fewer total iterations . in addition to the avi scheme , we briefly sketch how completely covariant spacetime integrators for electromagnetism can be implemented , without even requiring a 3 + 1 split into space and time components . we will begin by reviewing maxwell s equations : first developing the differential forms expression from a lagrangian variational principle , and next showing how this is equivalent to the familiar vector calculus formulation . we will then motivate the use of dec for computational electromagnetics , explaining how electromagnetic quantities can be modeled using discrete differential forms and operators on a spacetime mesh . these dec tools will then be used to set up the discrete maxwell s equations , and to show that the resulting numerical algorithm yields the yee and bossavit kettunen schemes as special cases , as well as a new avi method . finally , we will demonstrate that the discrete maxwell s equations can also be derived from a discrete variational principle , and will explore its other discrete geometric properties , including multisymplecticity and momentum map preservation . this section quickly reviews the differential forms approach to electromagnetism , in preparation for the associated discrete formulation given in the next section . for more details , the reader can refer to @xcite and @xcite . maxwell s equations , without free sources of charge or current , are traditionally expressed in terms of four vector fields in @xmath15-space : the electric field @xmath13 , magnetic field @xmath14 , electric flux density @xmath20 , and magnetic flux density @xmath4 . to translate these into the language of differential forms , we begin by replacing the electric field with a @xmath21-form @xmath22 and the magnetic flux density by a @xmath23-form @xmath24 . these have the coordinate expressions @xmath25 where @xmath26 and @xmath27 . the motivation for choosing @xmath22 as a @xmath21-form and @xmath24 as a @xmath23-form comes from the integral formulation of faraday s law , @xmath28 where @xmath13 is integrated over curves and @xmath4 is integrated over surfaces . similarly , ampre s law , @xmath29 integrates @xmath14 over curves and @xmath20 over surfaces , so we can likewise introduce a @xmath21-form @xmath30 and a @xmath23-form @xmath31 . now , @xmath13 and @xmath4 are related to @xmath20 and @xmath14 through the usual constitutive relations @xmath32 as shown in @xcite , we can view @xmath33 and @xmath34 as corresponding to hodge operators @xmath35 and @xmath36 , which map the @xmath21-form `` fields '' to @xmath23-form `` fluxes '' in space . therefore , this is compatible with viewing @xmath22 and @xmath30 as @xmath21-forms , and @xmath31 and @xmath24 as @xmath23-forms . note that in a vacuum , with @xmath37 and @xmath38 constant , one can simply express the equations in terms of @xmath13 and @xmath4 , choosing appropriate geometrized units such that @xmath39 , and hence ignoring the distinction between @xmath13 and @xmath20 and between @xmath4 and @xmath14 . this is typically the most familiar form of maxwell s equations , and the one that most students of electromagnetism first encounter . in this presentation , we will restrict ourselves to the vacuum case with geometrized units ; for geometric clarity , however , we will always distinguish between the @xmath21-forms @xmath22 and @xmath30 and the @xmath23-forms @xmath31 and @xmath24 . finally , we can incorporate free sources of charge and current by introducing the _ charge density @xmath15-form _ @xmath40 , as well as the _ current density @xmath23-form _ @xmath41 . these are required to satisfy the continuity of charge condition @xmath42 , which can be understood as a conservation law ( in the finite volume sense ) . in lorentzian spacetime , we can now combine @xmath22 and @xmath24 into a single object , the faraday @xmath23-form @xmath43 there is a theoretical advantage to combining the electric field and magnetic flux into a single spacetime object : this way , electromagnetic phenomena can be described in a relativistically covariant way , without favoring a particular split of spacetime into space and time components . in fact , we can turn the previous construction around : take @xmath16 to be the fundamental object , with @xmath22 and @xmath24 only emerging when we choose a particular coordinate frame . taking the hodge star of @xmath16 , we also get a dual @xmath23-form @xmath44 called the maxwell @xmath23-form . the equation @xmath17 describes the dual relationship between @xmath22 and @xmath24 on one hand , and @xmath31 and @xmath30 on the other , that is expressed in the constitutive relations . likewise , the charge density @xmath45 and current density @xmath46 can be combined into a single spacetime object , the source @xmath15-form @xmath47 having defined @xmath48 in this way , the continuity of charge condition simply requires that @xmath48 be closed , i.e. , @xmath49 . let @xmath50 be the electromagnetic potential @xmath21-form , satisfying @xmath51 , over the spacetime manifold @xmath52 . then define the @xmath0-form lagrangian density @xmath53 and its associated action functional @xmath54 = \int _ x \mathcal{l}.\ ] ] now , take a variation @xmath55 of @xmath50 , where @xmath55 vanishes on the boundary @xmath56 . then the variation of the action functional along @xmath55 is @xmath57 \cdot \alpha & = \left . \frac{\mathrm{d } } { \mathrm{d } \epsilon } \right\rvert _ { \epsilon = 0 } s[a + \epsilon \alpha ] \\ & = \int _ x \left ( - \mathrm{d } \alpha \wedge * \mathrm{d } a + \alpha \wedge \mathcal{j } \right ) \\ & = \int _ x \alpha \wedge \left ( - \mathrm{d } { * \mathrm{d}a } + \mathcal{j } \right ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where in this last equality we have integrated by parts , using the fact that @xmath55 vanishes on the boundary . hamilton s principle of stationary action requires this variation to be equal to zero for arbitrary @xmath55 , thus implying the electromagnetic euler lagrange equation , @xmath58 since @xmath59 , then clearly is equivalent to @xmath60 . furthermore , since @xmath61 , it follows that @xmath62 . hence , maxwell s equations with respect to the maxwell and faraday @xmath23-forms can be written as @xmath63 suppose now we choose the standard coordinate system @xmath64 on minkowski space @xmath65 , and define @xmath22 and @xmath24 through the relation @xmath66 . then a straightforward calculation shows that is equivalent to @xmath67 likewise , if @xmath68 , then is equivalent to @xmath69 hence this lagrangian , differential forms approach to maxwell s equations is _ strictly equivalent _ to the more classical vector calculus formulation in smooth spacetime . however , in discrete spacetime , we will see that the differential forms version is _ not _ equivalent to an arbitrary vector field discretization , but rather implies a particular choice of discrete objects . we can also derive maxwell s equations by using a mixed variational principle , similar to the hamilton pontryagin principle introduced by @xcite for classical lagrangian mechanics . to do this , we treat @xmath50 and @xmath16 as separate fields , while @xmath70 acts as a lagrange multiplier , weakly enforcing the constraint @xmath71 . define the extended action to be @xmath72 = \int _ x \left [ - \frac{1}{2 } f \wedge * f + a \wedge \mathcal{j } + \left ( f - \mathrm{d } a \right ) \wedge g \right ] .\ ] ] then , taking the variation of the action along some @xmath73 ( vanishing on @xmath56 ) , we have @xmath74 \cdot \left ( \alpha , \phi , \gamma \right ) & = \int _ x \left [ - \phi \wedge * f + \alpha \wedge \mathcal{j } + \left ( \phi - \mathrm{d } \alpha \right ) \wedge g + \left ( f - \mathrm{d } a \right ) \wedge \gamma \right ] \\ & = \int _ x \left [ \alpha \wedge \left ( \mathcal{j } - \mathrm{d } g \right ) + \phi \wedge \left ( g - * f \right ) + \left ( f - \mathrm{d } a \right ) \wedge \gamma \right ] .\end{aligned}\ ] ] therefore , setting this equal to zero , we get the equations @xmath75 this is precisely equivalent to maxwell s equations , as derived above . however , this approach provides some additional insight into the geometric structure of electromagnetics : the gauge condition @xmath51 and constitutive relations @xmath17 are _ explicitly included in the equations of motion _ , as a direct result of the variational principle . when solving an initial value problem , it is not necessary to use all of maxwell s equations to evolve the system forward in time . in fact , the curl equations and automatically conserve the quantities @xmath76 and @xmath77 . therefore , the divergence equations and can be viewed simply as constraints on initial conditions , while the curl equations completely describe the time evolution of the system . there are a number of ways to see why we can justify eliminating the divergence equations . a straightforward way is to take the divergence of equations and . since @xmath78 , we are left with @xmath79 therefore , if the divergence constraints are satisfied at the initial time , then they are satisfied for all time , since the divergence terms are constant . another approach is to notice that maxwell s equations depend only on the exterior derivative @xmath80 of the electromagnetic potential , and not on the value of @xmath50 itself . therefore , the system has a _ gauge symmetry _ : any gauge transformation @xmath81 leaves @xmath80 , and hence maxwell s equations , unchanged . choosing a time coordinate , we can then partially fix the gauge so that the electric scalar potential @xmath82 ( the so - called weyl gauge or temporal gauge ) , and so @xmath50 has only spatial components . in fact , these three remaining components correspond to those of the usual vector potential @xmath5 . the reduced euler lagrange equations in this gauge consist only of , while the remaining gauge symmetry @xmath83 yields a momentum map that automatically preserves @xmath84 in time . equations and are automatically preserved by the identity @xmath85 ; they are not actually part of the euler lagrange equations . a more detailed exposition of these calculations will be given in . in this section , we give a quick review of the fundamental objects and operations of discrete exterior calculus ( dec ) , a structure - preserving calculus of discrete differential forms . by construction , dec automatically preserves a number of important geometric structures , and hence it provides a fully discrete analog of the tools used in the previous section to express the differential forms version of maxwell s equations . in subsequent sections , we will use this framework to formulate maxwell s equations discretely , emulating the continuous version . modern computational electromagnetism started in the 1960s , when the finite element method ( fem ) , based on _ nodal basis functions _ , was used successfully to discretize the differential equations governing @xmath23-d static problems formulated in terms of a scalar potential . unfortunately , the initial success of the fem approach appeared unable to carry over to @xmath15-d problems without spurious numerical artifacts . with the introduction of _ edge elements _ in @xcite came the realization that a better discretization of the geometric structure of maxwell s electromagnetic theory was key to overcoming this obstacle ( see @xcite for more historical details ) . mathematical tools developed by weyl and whitney in the 1950s , in the context of algebraic topology , turned out to provide the necessary foundations on which robust numerical techniques for electromagnetism can be built , as detailed in @xcite . in this section , we show how to define differential forms and operators on a discrete mesh , in preparation to use this framework for computational modeling of classical fields . by construction , the calculus of discrete differential forms automatically preserves a number of important geometric structures , including stokes theorem , integration by parts ( with a proper treatment of boundaries ) , the de rham complex , poincar duality , poincar s lemma , and hodge theory . therefore , this provides a suitable foundation for the coordinate - free discretization of geometric field theories . in subsequent chapters , we will also use these discrete differential forms as the space of fields on which we will define discrete lagrangian variational principles . the particular `` flavor '' of discrete differential forms and operators we will be using is known as _ discrete exterior calculus _ , or _ dec _ for short ; see @xcite . ( for related efforts in this direction , see also @xcite and @xcite . ) guided by cartan s exterior calculus of differential forms on smooth manifolds , dec is a discrete calculus developed , _ ab initio _ , on discrete manifolds , so as to maintain the covariant nature of the quantities involved . this computational tool is based on the notion of discrete chains and cochains , used as basic building blocks for compatible discretizations of important geometric structures such as the de rham complex @xcite . the chain and cochain representations are not only attractive from a computational perspective due to their conceptual simplicity and elegance ; as we will see , they also originate from a theoretical framework defined by @xcite , who introduced the whitney and de rham maps that establish an isomorphism between simplicial cochains and lipschitz differential forms . dec is concerned with problems in which the smooth @xmath86-dimensional manifold @xmath52 is replaced by a discrete mesh precisely , by a cell complex that is manifold , admits a metric , and is orientable . the simplest example of such a mesh is a finite simplicial complex , such as a triangulation of a @xmath23-dimensional surface . we will generally denote the complex by @xmath87 , and a cell in the complex by @xmath88 . given a mesh @xmath87 , one can construct a _ dual mesh _ @xmath89 , where each @xmath90-cell @xmath91 corresponds to a dual @xmath92-cell @xmath93 . ( @xmath89 is `` dual '' to @xmath94 in the sense of a graph dual . ) one way to do this is as follows : place a dual vertex at the circumcenter of each @xmath86-simplex , then connect two dual vertices by an edge wherever the corresponding @xmath86-simplices share an @xmath95-simplex , and so on . this is called the _ circumcentric dual _ , and it has the important property that primal and dual cells are automatically orthogonal to one another , which is advantageous when defining an inner product ( as we will see later in this section ) . for example , the circumcentric dual of a delaunay triangulation , with the euclidean metric , is its corresponding voronoi diagram ( see ) . for more on the dual relationship between delaunay triangulations and voronoi diagrams , a standard reference is @xcite . a similar construction of the circumcenter can be carried out for higher - dimensional euclidean simplicial complexes , as well as for simplicial meshes in minkowski space . note that , in both the euclidean and lorentzian cases , the circumcenter may actually lie _ outside _ the simplex if it has a very bad aspect ratio , underscoring the importance of mesh quality for good numerical results . there are alternative ways to define the dual mesh for example , placing dual vertices at the barycenter rather than the circumcenter but we will use the circumcentric dual unless otherwise noted . note that a refined definition of the dual mesh , where dual cells at the boundary are restricted to @xmath87 , will be discussed in to allow proper enforcement of boundary conditions in computational electromagnetics . -d simplicial mesh ( left ) , we can construct its circumcentric dual mesh , called the voronoi diagram of the primal mesh ( right ) . in bold , we show one particular primal edge @xmath96 ( left ) and its corresponding dual edge @xmath97 ( right ) ; the convex hull of these cells @xmath98 is shaded dark grey . ] the fundamental objects of dec are discrete differential forms . a discrete @xmath90-form @xmath99 assigns a real number to each oriented @xmath90-dimensional cell @xmath100 in the mesh @xmath87 . ( the superscripts @xmath90 are not actually required by the notation , but they are often useful as reminders of what order of form or cell we are dealing with . ) this value is denoted by @xmath101 , and can be thought of as the value of @xmath102 `` integrated over '' the element @xmath100 , i.e. , @xmath103 for example , @xmath104-forms assign values to vertices , @xmath21-forms assign values to edges , etc . we can extend this to integrate over discrete paths by linearity : simply add the form s values on each cell in the path , taking care to flip the sign if the path is oriented opposite the cell . formally , these `` paths '' of @xmath90-dimensional elements are called _ chains _ , and discrete differential forms are _ cochains _ , where @xmath105 is the pairing between cochains and chains . differential forms can be defined either on the mesh @xmath87 or on its dual @xmath89 . we will refer to these as _ primal forms _ and _ dual forms _ respectively . note that there is a natural correspondence between primal @xmath90-forms and dual @xmath92-forms , since each primal @xmath90-cell has a dual @xmath92-cell . this is an important property that will be used below to define the discrete hodge star operator . the discrete exterior derivative @xmath19 is constructed to satisfy stokes theorem , which in the continuous sense is written @xmath106 therefore , if @xmath55 is a discrete differential @xmath90-form , then the @xmath107-form @xmath108 is defined on any @xmath109-chain @xmath91 by @xmath110 where @xmath111 is the @xmath112-chain boundary of @xmath113 . for this reason , @xmath19 is often called the _ coboundary _ operator in cohomology theory . the discrete hodge star transforms @xmath90-forms on the primal mesh into @xmath92-forms on the dual mesh , and vice - versa . in our setup , we will use the so - called diagonal ( or mass - lumped ) approximation of the hodge star @xcite because of its simplicity , but note that higher - order accurate versions can be substituted . given a discrete form @xmath55 , its _ hodge star _ @xmath114 is defined by the relation @xmath115 where @xmath116 and @xmath117 are the volumes of these elements , and @xmath118 is the causality operator , which equals @xmath119 when @xmath113 is spacelike and @xmath120 otherwise . ( for more information on alternative discrete hodge operators , the reader may refer to , e.g. , @xcite . ) define the _ @xmath121 inner product _ @xmath122 between two primal @xmath90-forms to be @xmath123 where the sum is taken over all @xmath90-dimensional elements @xmath91 , and @xmath124 is the @xmath86-dimensional convex hull of @xmath125 ( see ) . the final equality holds as a result of using the circumcentric dual , since @xmath91 and @xmath126 are orthogonal to one another , and hence @xmath127 . ( indeed , this is one of the advantages of using the circumcentric dual , since one only needs to store volume information about the primal and dual cells themselves , and not about these primal - dual convex hulls . ) this inner product can be expressed in terms of @xmath128 , as in the continuous case , for a particular choice of the discrete primal - dual wedge product ; see @xcite . note that since we have already defined a discrete version of the operators @xmath129 and @xmath130 , we immediately have a discrete codifferential @xmath131 , with the same formal expression as given previously . see for a visual diagram of primal and dual discrete forms , along with the corresponding operators @xmath132 , for the case where @xmath87 is a @xmath15-d tetrahedral mesh . -d simplicial mesh . in the top row , we see how a discrete @xmath90-form lives on @xmath90-cells of the primal mesh , for @xmath133 ; the bottom row shows the location of the corresponding dual @xmath92-forms on the dual mesh . the differential operators @xmath129 and @xmath131 map `` horizontally '' between @xmath90 and @xmath134 forms , while the hodge star @xmath130 and its inverse @xmath135 map `` vertically '' between primal and dual forms . ] dec can be implemented simply and efficiently using linear algebra . a @xmath90-form @xmath55 can be stored as a vector , where its entries are the values of @xmath55 on each @xmath90-cell of the mesh . that is , given a list of @xmath90-cells @xmath136 , the entries of the vector are @xmath137 . the exterior derivative @xmath129 , taking @xmath90-forms to @xmath134-forms , is then represented as a matrix : in fact , it is precisely the _ incidence matrix _ between @xmath90-cells and @xmath134-cells in the mesh , with sparse entries @xmath138 . the hodge star taking primal @xmath90-forms to dual @xmath92-forms becomes a square matrix , and in the case of the diagonal hodge star , it is the diagonal matrix with entries @xmath139 . the discrete inner product is then simply the hodge star matrix taken as a quadratic form . because of this straightforward isomorphism between dec and linear algebra , problems posed in the language of dec can take advantage of existing numerical linear algebra codes . for more details on programming and implementation , refer to @xcite . particular care is required to properly enforce initial and boundary conditions on the discrete spacetime boundary @xmath140 . for example , in electromagnetism , we may wish to set initial conditions for @xmath22 and @xmath24 at time @xmath141 but while @xmath24 is defined on @xmath142 at @xmath141 , @xmath22 is not . in fact , as we will see , @xmath22 lives on edges that are extruded between the time slices @xmath143 and @xmath144 , so unless we modify our definitions , we can only initialize @xmath22 at the half - step @xmath145 . ( this half - step issue also arises with the standard yee scheme . ) there are some applications where it may be acceptable to initialize @xmath22 and @xmath24 at separate times ( for example , when the fields are initialized randomly and integrated for a long time to compute a resonance spectrum ) , but we wish to be able to handle the more general case . although our previous exposition of dec thus far applies anywhere away from a boundary , notions as simple as `` dual cell '' need to be defined carefully on or near @xmath140 . for a primal mesh @xmath87 , the dual mesh @xmath146 is defined as _ the voronoi dual of @xmath87 restricted to @xmath87_. this truncates the portion of the dual cells extending outside of @xmath147 ; compare with the earlier . this new definition results in the addition of a dual vertex at the circumcenter of each boundary @xmath95-simplex , in addition to the interior @xmath86-simplices as previously defined . to complete the dual mesh @xmath146 , we add a dual edge between adjacent dual vertices on the boundary , as well as between dual boundary vertices and their neighboring interior dual vertices , and proceed similarly with higher - dimensional dual cells . for intuition , one can imagine the @xmath95-dimensional boundary to be a vanishingly thin @xmath86-dimensional shell . that is , each boundary @xmath148-simplex can be thought of as a prismal @xmath90-cell that has been `` squashed flat '' along the boundary normal direction . this process is quite similar to the use of `` ghost cells '' at the boundary , as is commonly done for finite volume methods ( see * ? ? ? note that these additional dual cells provide the boundary @xmath149 with its own dual mesh @xmath150 . in fact , the boundary of the dual is now equal to the dual of the boundary , i.e. , @xmath151 . -d example , the dual mesh is properly defined near the boundary by adding dual vertices on the boundary edges . the restricted voronoi cells of the primal boundary vertices ( shaded at right ) thus have boundaries containing both dual edges ( dashed lines ) _ and _ primal boundary half - edges . ] returning to the example of initial conditions on @xmath22 and @xmath24 , we recall that @xmath22 is defined on extruded faces normal to the time slice @xmath143 . therefore , thanks to the proper restriction of the voronoi diagram to the domain , we can now define @xmath22 on _ edges _ in @xmath152 at time @xmath143 , where these edges can be understood as vanishingly thin faces ( i.e. , extruded between some @xmath153 and @xmath143 for @xmath154 ) . notice finally that with this construction of @xmath146 , there is a dual relationship between dirichlet conditions on the dual mesh and neumann conditions on the primal mesh , e.g. , between primal fields and dual fluxes , as expected . with the dual mesh properly defined , dual forms can now be defined on the boundary . therefore , the discrete duality between @xmath155 and @xmath156 can be generalized to include nonvanishing boundary terms . if @xmath55 is a primal @xmath148-form and @xmath157 is a primal @xmath90-form , then @xmath158 in the boundary integral , @xmath55 is still a primal @xmath148-form on @xmath159 , while @xmath160 is an @xmath92-form taken on the boundary dual @xmath161 . formula is readily proved using the familiar method of discrete `` summation by parts , '' and thus agrees with the integration by parts formula for smooth differential forms . in this section , we explain how to obtain numerical algorithms for solving maxwell s equations with dec . to do so , we will proceed in the following order . first , we will find a sensible way to define the discrete forms @xmath16 , @xmath70 , and @xmath48 on a spacetime mesh . next , we will use the dec version of the operators @xmath19 and @xmath162 to obtain the discrete maxwell s equations . while we havent yet shown that these equations are variational in the discrete sense , we will show later in that the lagrangian derivation of the smooth maxwell s equations also holds with the dec operators , in precisely the same way . finally , we will discuss how these equations can be used to define a numerical method for computational electromagnetics . in particular , for a rectangular grid , we will show that our setup results in the traditional yee scheme . for a general triangulation of space with equal time steps , the resulting scheme will be bossavit and kettunen s scheme . we will then develop an avi method , where each spatial element can be assigned a different time step , and the time integration of maxwell s equations can be performed on the elements asynchronously . finally , we will comment on the equations for fully generalized spacetime meshes , e.g. , an arbitrary meshing of @xmath163 by @xmath0-simplices . note that the idea of discretizing maxwell s equations using spacetime cochains was mentioned in , e.g. , @xcite , as well as in a paper by @xcite taking the more abstract perspective of higher - level `` @xmath164-form '' versions of electromagnetism and category theory . suppose that we have a rectangular grid in @xmath165 , oriented along the axes @xmath64 . to simplify this exposition ( although it is not necessary ) , let us also suppose that the grid has uniform space and time steps @xmath166 . note that the dec setup applies directly to a non - simplicial rectangular mesh , since an @xmath86-rectangle does in fact have a circumcenter . since @xmath16 is a @xmath23-form , its values should live on @xmath23-faces in this grid . following the continuous expression of @xmath16 @xmath167 and due to the tensor product nature of the regular grid , the exact assignment of each @xmath23-face becomes simple : _ the six components of @xmath16 correspond precisely to the six types of @xmath23-faces in a @xmath0-d rectangular grid_. simply assign the values @xmath168 to faces parallel to the @xmath169-plane , @xmath170 to faces parallel to the @xmath171-plane , and @xmath172 to faces parallel to the @xmath173-plane . likewise , assign @xmath174 to faces parallel to the @xmath175-plane , @xmath176 to faces parallel to the @xmath177-plane , and @xmath178 to faces parallel to the @xmath179-plane . this is pictured in . are stored on the primal @xmath23-faces of a @xmath0-d rectangular grid . shown here are the three mixed space / time @xmath15-cells , and the one purely spatial @xmath15-cell ( lower right ) . ] let us look at these values on the faces of a typical @xmath0-rectangle @xmath180 \times \left [ y _ l , y _ { l + 1 } \right ] \times \left [ z _ m , z _ { m + 1 } \right ] \times \left [ t _ n , t _ { n + 1 } \right ] $ ] . to simplify the notation , we can index each value of @xmath16 by the midpoint of the @xmath23-face on which it lives : for example , @xmath181 is stored on the face @xmath182 \times \left\{y _ l\right\ } \times \left\{z _ m\right\ } \times \left [ t _ n , t _ { n + 1 } \right ] $ ] , parallel to the @xmath183-plane . hence , the following values are assigned to the corresponding faces : @xmath184 @xmath185 we see that a `` staggered grid '' arises from the fact that @xmath22 and @xmath24 naturally live on @xmath23-faces , not at vertices or @xmath0-cells . the discrete equations of motion are , as in the continuous case , @xmath186 where now these equations are interpreted in the sense of dec . let us first look at the dec interpretation of @xmath187 . since @xmath188 is a discrete @xmath15-form , it takes values on the @xmath15-faces of each @xmath0-rectangle . its values are as follows : @xmath189 @xmath190 @xmath191 @xmath192 setting each of these equal to zero , we arrive at the following four equations : @xmath193 @xmath194 @xmath195 and @xmath196 these equations are the discrete version of the equations @xmath197 moreover , since @xmath22 and @xmath24 are differential forms , this can also be seen as a discretization of the _ integral version _ of maxwell s equations as well ! because dec satisfies a discrete stokes theorem , this automatically preserves the equivalence between the differential and integral formulations of electromagnetism . doing the same with the equation @xmath60 , evaluating on dual @xmath15-faces this time , we arrive at four more equations : @xmath198 @xmath199 @xmath200 and @xmath201 this results from storing @xmath202 on the dual grid , as shown in . this set of equations is the discrete version of @xmath203 are stored on dual @xmath23-faces in a rectangular grid . shown here are a mixed space / time dual @xmath15-cell ( left ) , corresponding to a spacelike primal edge ; and a purely spatial dual @xmath15-cell ( right ) , corresponding to a timelike primal edge . there are also two other mixed space / time cells , as in , that are not shown here . ] after eliminating the redundant divergence equations and ( see for details ) and making the substitutions @xmath204 , @xmath205 , the remaining equations are precisely the yee scheme , as formulated in @xcite . we now consider the case of an unstructured grid in space , but with uniform steps in time as advocated in , e.g. , @xcite . suppose that , instead of a rectangular grid for both space and time , we have an arbitrary space discretization on which we would like to take uniform time steps . ( for example , we may be given a tetrahedral mesh of the spatial domain . ) this mesh contains two distinct types of @xmath23-faces . first , there are triangular faces that live entirely in the space mesh at a single position in time . every edge of such a face is spacelike that is , it has positive length so the causality operator defined in takes the value @xmath206 . second , there are rectangular faces that live between time steps . these faces consist of a single spacelike edge extruded by one time step . because they have one timelike edge , these faces satisfy @xmath207 . again , the circumcentric - dual dec framework applies directly to this type of mesh , since the prismal extrusion of a @xmath15-simplex still has a circumcenter . again , we can characterize the discrete values of @xmath16 by looking at the continuous expression @xmath208 therefore , let us assign @xmath24 to the purely spacelike faces and @xmath209 to the mixed space / time faces . looking at @xmath17 shows that mixed dual faces should store @xmath210 and spacelike dual faces should store @xmath31 ; see . is stored on primal @xmath23-faces ( left ) , while @xmath17 is stored on dual @xmath23-faces ( right ) . shown here are the values on mixed space / time @xmath15-cells . ( the purely spatial @xmath15-cells , which correspond to the divergence equations and do not contribute to the equations of motion , are not shown . ) ] as in @xcite , we can store the values of each differential form over every spatial element in an array , using the method described in . this leads to the arrays @xmath211 and @xmath212 at whole time steps @xmath86 , and @xmath213 and @xmath214 at half time steps . let @xmath215 denote the edges - to - faces incidence matrix for the spatial domain . that is , @xmath216 is the matrix corresponding to the discrete exterior derivative , taken only in space , from primal @xmath21-forms to primal @xmath23-forms . similarly , the transpose @xmath217 corresponds to the exterior derivative from spatial dual @xmath21-forms to dual @xmath23-forms . then the equation @xmath218 , evaluated on all prismal @xmath15-faces becomes @xmath219 likewise , the equation @xmath60 , evaluated on all space / time @xmath15-faces in the dual mesh , becomes @xmath220 we can also evaluate @xmath218 and @xmath221 on spacelike @xmath15-faces , e.g , tetrahedra ; these simply yield the discrete versions of the divergence conditions for @xmath24 and @xmath31 , which can be eliminated . therefore , the dec scheme for such a mesh is equivalent to bossavit and kettunen s yee - like scheme ; additionally , when the spatial mesh is taken to be rectangular , this integrator reduces to the standard yee scheme . however , we now have solid foundations to extend this integrator to handle asynchronous updates for improved efficiency . instead of picking the same time step size for every element of the spatial mesh , as in the previous two sections , it is often more efficient to assign each element its own , optimized time step , as done in @xcite for problems in elastodynamics . in this case , rather than the entire mesh evolving forward in time simultaneously , individual elements advance one - by - one , asynchronously hence the name _ asynchronous variational integrator _ ( avi ) . as we will prove in , this asynchronous update process will maintain the variational nature of the integration scheme . here , we again allow the spatial mesh to be unstructured . after choosing a primal space mesh , assign each spatial @xmath23-face ( e.g. , triangle ) @xmath91 its own discrete time set @xmath222 for example , one might assign each face a fixed time step size @xmath223 , taking equal time steps _ within _ each element , but with @xmath224 varying _ across _ elements . we further require for simplicity of explanation that , except for the initial time , no two faces take the same time step : that is , @xmath225 for @xmath226 . in order to keep proper time at the edges @xmath227 where multiple faces with different time sets meet , we let @xmath228 therefore the mixed space - time @xmath23-faces , which correspond to the edge @xmath227 extruded over a time step , are assigned the set of intermediate times @xmath229 where @xmath230 . the values stored on a primal avi mesh are shown in . since @xmath231 when @xmath232 , each spatial edge @xmath227 takes more time steps than any one of its incident faces @xmath91 ; as a result , it is not possible in general to construct a circumcentric dual on the entire spacetime avi mesh , since the mesh is not prismal and hence the circumcenter may not exist . instead , we find the circumcentric dual to the _ spatial _ mesh , and assign same time steps to the primal and dual elements @xmath233 this results in well - defined primal and dual cells for each @xmath23-element in spacetime , and hence a hodge star for this order . ( a hodge star on forms of different order is not needed to formulate maxwell s equations . ) the equation @xmath218 , evaluated on a mixed space / time @xmath15-cell , becomes @xmath234 similarly , the equation @xmath60 becomes @xmath235 where @xmath236 equals @xmath21 when face @xmath91 has @xmath237 for some @xmath86 , and @xmath104 otherwise . ( that is , the indicator function `` picks out '' the incident face that lives at the same time step as this edge . ) solving an initial value problem can then be summarized by the following update loop : 1 . pick the minimum time @xmath238 where @xmath239 has not yet been computed . 2 . advance @xmath240 according to . update @xmath241 . 4 . advance @xmath242 on neighboring edges @xmath243 according to . update @xmath244 . as detailed in @xcite for elastodynamics , the explicit avi update scheme can be implemented by selecting mesh elements from a priority queue , sorted by time , and iterating forward . however , as written above , the scheme is not strictly iterative , since depends on past values of @xmath22 . this can be easily fixed by rewriting the avi scheme to advance in the variables @xmath50 and @xmath22 instead , where the potential @xmath50 effectively stores the cumulative contribution of @xmath245 to the value of @xmath246 on neighboring faces . compared to the avi for elasticity , @xmath50 plays the role of the positions @xmath247 , while @xmath22 plays the role of the ( negative ) velocities @xmath248 . the algorithm is given as pseudocode in . note that if all elements take uniform time steps , the avi reduces to the bossavit kettunen scheme . ' '' '' @xmath249 _ // store initial field values and times _ @xmath250 compute the next update time @xmath251 @xmath252.push@xmath253 _ // push element onto queue with its next update time _ @xmath254 @xmath252.pop ( ) _ // pop next element @xmath91 and time @xmath255 from queue _ @xmath256 _ // update neighboring values of @xmath50 at time @xmath255 _ @xmath257 @xmath258 @xmath259 @xmath260 @xmath261 @xmath262 _ // update element s time _ compute the next update time @xmath263 @xmath252.push@xmath264 _ // schedule @xmath91 for next update _ ' '' '' we first present a simple numerical example demonstrating the good energy behavior of our asynchronous integrator . the avi was used to integrate in time over a @xmath23-d rectangular cavity with perfectly electrically conducting ( pec ) boundaries , so that @xmath22 vanishes at the boundary of the domain . @xmath22 was given random values at the initial time , so as to excite all frequency modes , and integrated for 8 seconds . each spatial element was given a time step equal to 1/10 of the stability - limiting time step determined by the cfl condition . this simulation was done for two different spatial discretizations . the first is a uniform discretization so that each element has identical time step size , which coincides exactly with the yee scheme . the second discretization randomly partitioned the @xmath265- and @xmath266-axes , so that each element has completely unique spatial dimensions and time step size , and so the update rule is truly asynchronous . the energy plot for the uniform yee discretization is shown in , while the energy for the random discretization is shown in . even for a completely random , irregular mesh , our asynchronous integrator displays near - energy preservation qualities . such numerical behavior stems from the variational nature of our integrator , which will be detailed in . in addition , we tested the performance of the avi method with regard to computing the resonant frequencies of a @xmath15-d rectangular cavity , but using an _ unstructured _ tetrahedral spatial mesh . while the resonant frequencies are relatively simple to compute analytically , nodal finite element methods are well known to produce spurious modes for this type of simulation . by contrast , as shown in , the avi simulation produces a resonance spectrum in close agreement with theory . furthermore , by refining the mesh close to the spatial boundary , while using a coarser discretization in the interior , we were able to achieve these results with less computational effort than a uniformly fine mesh would require , since the time steps were selected to be proportional to the respective element sizes . finally , we look at the most general possible case : an arbitrary discretization of spacetime , such as a simplicial @xmath0-complex . such a mesh is completely relativistically covariant , so that @xmath16 can not be objectively separated into the components @xmath22 and @xmath24 without a coordinate frame . in most engineering applications , relativistic effects are insignificant , so a 3 + 1 mesh ( as in the previous subsections ) is almost always adequate , and avoids the additional complications of spacetime mesh construction . still , we expect that there are scientific applications where a covariant discretization of electromagnetism may be very useful . for example , many implementations of numerical general relativity ( using regge calculus for instance ) are formulated on simplicial @xmath0-complexes ; one might wish to simulate the interaction of gravity with the electromagnetic field , or charged matter , on such a mesh . first , a quick caution on mesh construction : since the lorentz metric is not positive definite , it is possible to create edges that have length @xmath104 , despite connecting two distinct points in @xmath267 ( so - called `` null '' or `` lightlike '' edges ) . meshes containing such edges are degenerate akin to a euclidean mesh containing a triangle with two identical points . in particular , the dec hodge star is undefined for @xmath104-volume elements ( due to division by zero ) . even without @xmath104-volume elements , it is still possible for a spacetime mesh to violate causality , so extra care should be taken . methods to construct causality - respecting spacetime meshes over a given spatial domain can be found in , e.g. , @xcite and @xcite . when the mesh contains no inherent choice of a time direction , there is no canonical way to split @xmath16 into @xmath22 and @xmath24 . therefore , one must set up the problem by assigning values of @xmath16 directly to @xmath23-cells ( or equivalently , assigning values of @xmath50 to @xmath21-cells ) . for initial boundary value problems , one might choose to have the initial and final time steps be prismal , so that @xmath22 and @xmath24 can be used for initial and final values , while the internal discretization is general . the equations @xmath218 and @xmath60 can be implemented directly in dec . since this mesh is generally unstructured , there is no simple algorithm as the ones we presented above . instead , the equations on @xmath16 results in a sparse linear system which , given proper boundary conditions , can be solved globally with direct or iterative solvers . however , it is clear that the previous three examples that the methods of yee , bossavit kettunen , and our avi integrator are special cases where the global solution is particularly simple to compute via synchronous or asynchronous time updates . it is known that , while variational integrators in mechanics do not preserve energy exactly , they have excellent energy behavior , in that it tends to oscillate close to the exact value . this is only true , however , when the integrator takes time steps of uniform size ; adaptive and other non - uniform stepping approaches can give poor results unless additional measures are taken to enforce good energy behavior . ( see ( * ? ? ? * chapter viii ) for a good discussion of this problem for mechanics applications . ) therefore , there is no reason to expect that _ arbitrary _ meshes of spacetime will yield energy results as good as the yee , bossavit kettunen , and avi schemes . however , if one is taking a truly covariant approach to spacetime , `` energy '' is not even defined without specifying a time coordinate . likewise , one would not necessarily expect good energy behavior from the other methods with respect to an arbitrary transformation of spatial coordinates . which sort of mesh to choose is thus highly application - dependent . in this section , we complete our exposition with a number of theoretical results about the discrete and continuous maxwell s equations . in particular , we show that the dec formulation of electromagnetism derives from a discrete lagrangian variational principle , and that this formulation is consequently multisymplectic . furthermore , we explore the gauge symmetry of maxwell s equations , and detail how a particular choice of gauge eliminates the equation for @xmath84 from the euler lagrange equations , while preserving it automatically as a momentum map . the discrete maxwell s equations are variational . the idea of this proof is to emulate the derivation of the continuous maxwell s equations from . interpreting this in the sense of dec , we will obtain the discrete maxwell s equations . given a discrete @xmath21-form @xmath50 and dual source @xmath15-form @xmath48 , define the discrete lagrangian @xmath0-form @xmath268 with the corresponding discrete action principle @xmath269 = \left\langle \mathcal{l } _ d , k \right\rangle . \nonumber\ ] ] then , taking a discrete @xmath21-form variation @xmath55 vanishing on the boundary , the corresponding variation of the action is @xmath270 \cdot \alpha = \left\langle - \mathrm{d } \alpha \wedge * \mathrm{d } a + \alpha \wedge \mathcal{j } , k \right\rangle = \left\langle \alpha \wedge \left ( - \mathrm{d } { * \mathrm{d } a } + \mathcal{j } \right ) , k \right\rangle . \nonumber\ ] ] ( here we use the bold @xmath271 to indicate that we are differentiating over the _ smooth space of discrete forms _ @xmath50 , as opposed to differentiating over discrete spacetime , for which we use @xmath19 . ) setting this equal to @xmath104 for all variations @xmath55 , the resulting discrete euler lagrange equations are therefore @xmath272 . defining the discrete @xmath23-forms @xmath71 and @xmath17 , this implies @xmath273 and @xmath274 , the discrete maxwell s equations . the concept of _ multisymplecticity _ for lagrangian field theories was developed in @xcite , where it was shown to arise from the boundary terms for general variations of the action , i.e. , those not restricted to vanish at the boundary . as originally presented , the cartan form @xmath275 is an @xmath276-form , where the @xmath86-dimensional boundary integral is then obtained by contracting @xmath275 with a variation . the multisymplectic @xmath277-form @xmath278 is then given by @xmath279 . contracting @xmath278 with two arbitrary variations gives an @xmath86-form that vanishes when integrated over the boundary , a result called the _ multisymplectic form formula _ , which results from the identity @xmath280 . in the special case of mechanics , where @xmath281 , the boundary consists of the initial and final time points ; hence , this implies the usual result that the symplectic @xmath23-form @xmath282 is preserved by the time flow . alternatively , as communicated to us by @xcite , one can view the cartan form @xmath283 as an @xmath86-form - valued @xmath21-form , and the multisymplectic form @xmath278 as an @xmath86-form - valued @xmath23-form . therefore , one simply evaluates these forms on tangent variations to obtain a boundary integral , rather than taking contractions . these two formulations are equivalent on smooth spaces . however , we will adopt patrick s latter definition , since it is more easily adapted to problems on discrete meshes : @xmath284 and @xmath278 remain smooth @xmath21- and @xmath23-forms , respectively , but their @xmath86-form values are now taken to be discrete . see for an illustration of the discrete multisymplectic form formula . the discrete maxwell s equations are multisymplectic . let @xmath285 be an arbitrary subcomplex , and consider the discrete action functional @xmath286 restricted to @xmath87 . suppose now that we take a discrete variation @xmath55 , _ without _ requiring it to vanish on the boundary @xmath142 . then variations of the action contain an additional boundary term @xmath270 \cdot \alpha = \left\langle \alpha \wedge \left ( - \mathrm{d } { * \mathrm{d } a } + \mathcal{j } \right ) , k \right\rangle + \left\langle \alpha \wedge * d a , \partial k \right\rangle . \nonumber\ ] ] restricting to the space of potentials @xmath50 that satisfy the discrete euler lagrange equations , the first term vanishes , leaving only @xmath287 then we can define the _ cartan form _ @xmath288 by @xmath289 since @xmath290 takes a tangent vector @xmath55 and produces a discrete @xmath15-form on the boundary of the subcomplex , it is a _ smooth 1-form taking discrete @xmath15-form values_. now , since the _ space of discrete forms _ is itself actually continuous , we can take the exterior derivative in the smooth sense on both sides of . evaluating along another first variation @xmath157 ( again restricted to the space of euler lagrange solutions ) , we then get @xmath291 \cdot \alpha \cdot \beta = \left\langle \mathbf{d } \theta \cdot \alpha \cdot \beta , \partial k \right\rangle . \nonumber\ ] ] finally , defining the multisymplectic form @xmath292 , and using the fact that @xmath293 , we get the relation @xmath294 for all variations @xmath295 ; is a discrete version of the multisymplectic form formula . since this holds for any subcomplex @xmath87 , it follows that these schemes are multisymplectic . -d asynchronous - time mesh @xmath296 , where the shaded region is an arbitrary subcomplex @xmath285 . given any two variations @xmath297 of the field , and the multisymplectic form @xmath298 , the formula states that @xmath299 vanishes when integrated over the boundary @xmath140 ( shown in bold ) . ] we now explore the symmetry of maxwell s equations under gauge transformations . this symmetry allows us to reduce the equations by eliminating the time component of @xmath50 ( for some chosen time coordinate ) , effectively fixing the electric scalar potential to zero . because this is an incomplete gauge , there is a remaining gauge symmetry , and hence a conserved momentum map . this conserved quantity turns out to be the charge density @xmath300 , which justifies its elimination from the euler lagrange equations . these calculations are done with differential forms and exterior calculus , hence they apply equally to the smooth and discrete cases of electromagnetism . because maxwell s equations only depend on @xmath80 , they are invariant under gauge transformations of the form @xmath81 , where @xmath301 is any scalar function on spacetime . if we fix a time coordinate , we can now choose the weyl gauge , so that the time component @xmath302 . therefore , we can assume that @xmath303 in fact , @xmath304 are precisely the components of the familiar vector potential @xmath5 , i.e. , @xmath305 . having fixed the gauge and chosen a time coordinate , we can now define two new `` partial exterior derivative '' operators , @xmath306 ( time ) and @xmath307 ( space ) , where @xmath308 . since @xmath50 contains no @xmath309 terms , @xmath310 is a @xmath23-form containing only the space terms of @xmath311 , while @xmath312 contains the terms involving both space and time . that is , @xmath313 restricted to this subspace of potentials , the lagrangian density then becomes @xmath314 next , varying the action along a restricted variation @xmath55 that vanishes on @xmath56 , @xmath315 \cdot \alpha & = \int _ x \left ( \mathrm{d } _ t \alpha \wedge { d } - \mathrm{d } _ s \alpha \wedge h \wedge \mathrm{d } t + \alpha \wedge j \wedge \mathrm{d } t \right ) \label{eqn : weylaction}\\ & = \int _ x \alpha \wedge \left ( \mathrm{d } _ t d - \mathrm{d } _ s h \wedge \mathrm{d } t + j \wedge \mathrm{d } t \right ) .\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] setting this equal to zero by hamilton s principle , one immediately gets ampre s law as the sole euler lagrange equation . the divergence constraint @xmath316 , corresponding to gauss law , has been eliminated via the restriction to the weyl gauge . let us restrict @xmath50 to be an euler lagrange solution in the weyl gauge , but remove the previous requirement that variations @xmath55 be fixed at the initial time @xmath143 and final time @xmath317 . then , varying the action along this new @xmath55 , the euler lagrange term disappears , but we now pick up an additional boundary term due to integration by parts @xmath318 \cdot \alpha = \left . \int _ { \sigma } \alpha \wedge { d } \,\right\rvert _ { t _ 0 } ^ { t _ f } , \ ] ] where @xmath319 denotes a cauchy surface of @xmath52 , corresponding to the spatial domain . if we vary along a gauge transformation @xmath320 , then this becomes @xmath318 \cdot \mathrm{d } _ s f = \left . \sigma \mathrm{d } _ s f \wedge { d } \,\right\rvert _ { t _ 0 } ^ { t _ f } = - \left . \int _ \sigma f \wedge \mathrm{d } _ s { d } \,\right\rvert _ { t _ 0 } ^ { t _ f } \ ] ] alternatively , plugging @xmath321 into , we get @xmath318 \cdot \mathrm{d } _ s f = \int _ x \mathrm{d } _ s f \wedge j \wedge \mathrm{d } t = - \int _ x f \wedge \mathrm{d } _ s j \wedge \mathrm{d } t = - \int _ x f \wedge \mathrm{d } _ t \rho = - \left . \int _ \sigma f \wedge \rho \,\right\rvert _ { t _ 0 } ^ { t _ f } .\ ] ] since these two expressions are equal , and @xmath301 is an arbitrary function , it follows that @xmath322 this indicates that @xmath323 is a conserved quantity , a momentum map , so if gauss law holds at the initial time , then it holds for all subsequent times as well . it should be noted that the variational structure and symmetry of maxwell s equations may be affected by the boundary conditions that one chooses to impose . there are many boundary conditions that one can specify independent of the initial values , such as the pec condition used in the numerical example in . however , one can imagine more complicated boundary conditions where which the boundary interacts nontrivially with the interior of the domain such as dissipative or forced boundary conditions , where energy / momentum is removed from or added to the system . in these cases , one will obviously _ not _ conclude that the charge density @xmath324 is conserved , but more generally that the _ change _ in charge is related to the flux through the spatial boundary . this is because , in the momentum map derivation above , the values of @xmath301 on the initial time slice causally affects its values on the spatial boundary at intermediate times , not just on the final time slice . thus , the spatial part of @xmath56 can not be neglected for arbitrary boundary conditions . the continued success of the yee scheme for many applications of computational electromagnetism , for over four decades , illustrates the value of structure - preserving numerical integrators for maxwell s equations . recent advances by , among others , bossavit and kettunen , and gross and kotiuga , have demonstrated the important role of compatible spatial discretization using differential forms , allowing for yee - like schemes that apply on generalized spatial meshes . in this paper , we have extended this approach by considering discrete forms on _ spacetime _ , encapsulating both space and time discretization , and have derived a general family of geometric numerical integrators for maxwell s equations . furthermore , since we have derived these integrators from a discrete variational principle , the resulting methods are provably multisymplectic and momentum - map - preserving , and they experimentally show correct global energy behavior . besides proving the variational nature of well - known techniques such as the yee and bossavit kettunen schemes , we have also introduced a new asynchronous integrator , so that time step sizes can be taken non - uniformly over the spatial domain for increased efficiency , while still maintaining the desirable variational and energy behavior of the other methods . one promising avenue for future work involves increasing the order of accuracy of these methods by deriving higher - order discrete hodge star operators . while this would involve redefining the hodge star matrix to be non - diagonal , the discrete maxwell s equations would remain formally the same , and hence there would be no change in the variational or multisymplectic properties proven here . we are currently exploring the development of a spectrally accurate spatial hodge star , which might make these geometric schemes competitive for applications where non - variational spectral codes are currently favored . additionally , the recent work of @xcite has shown that avis can be implemented as parallel algorithms for solid mechanics simulations . this uses the fact that , due to the asynchronous update procedure , an element does not need information from every one of its neighbors at every time step , which lessens the need for communication among parallel nodes . the resulting parallel avis , or pavis , can therefore take advantage of parallel computing architecture for improved efficiency . it is reasonable to expect that the same might be done in the case of our electromagnetic avi . while we have experimentally observed the fact that variational integrators exhibit near - energy conservation , little is known about this behavior from a theoretical standpoint . in the case of odes in mechanics , backwards error analysis has shown that these methods exactly integrate a nearby smooth hamiltonian system , although not much known about how this relates to the discrete variational principle on the lagrangian side . some initial work has been done in @xcite to understand , also by a backward error analysis approach , why discrete multisymplectic methods also display good energy behavior . finally , variational methods using discrete spacetime forms may be developed for field theories other than electromagnetism . promising candidates include numerical general relativity and fluid dynamics , although the latter is complicated by the difficulty in finding a proper discretization of the infinite - dimensional diffeomorphism group . if discrete lagrangian densities are developed for these theories , it should be straightforward to combine them with the electromagnetic lagrangian , resulting in numerical methods to simulate , e.g. , gravity coupled with an electromagnetic field , or the dynamics of a charged or magnetic fluid . we would like to thank several people for their inspiration and suggestions . first of all , alain bossavit for suggesting many years ago that we take the present dec approach to computational electromagnetism , and for his excellent lectures at caltech on the subject . second , michael ortiz and eva kanso for their ongoing interactions on related topics and suggestions . we also thank doug arnold , uri ascher , robert kotiuga , melvin leok , adrian lew , and matt west for their feedback and encouragement . in addition , the @xmath15-d avi simulations shown in were programmed and implemented by patrick xia , as part of a summer undergraduate research fellowship at caltech . desbrun , m. , a. n. hirani , and j. e. marsden ( 2003 ) , discrete exterior calculus for variational problems in computer vision and graphics . in _ proceedings of the 42nd ieee conference on decision and control ( cdc ) _ , volume 5 , pages 49024907 . ieee press , washington , dc . desbrun , m. , e. kanso , and y. tong ( 2008 ) , discrete differential forms for computational modeling . in _ discrete differential geometry _ , volume 38 of _ oberwolfach semin . _ , pages 287324 . birkhuser , basel . elcott , s. , and p. schrder ( 2005 ) , building your own dec at home . in _ siggraph 05 : acm siggraph 2005 courses_. acm press , new york . http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1198555.1198667[`doi:10.1145/1198555.1198667 ` ] . erickson , j. , d. guoy , j. sullivan , and a. ngr ( 2005 ) , building spacetime meshes over arbitrary spatial domains . _ engineering with computers _ , * 20 * ( 4 ) , 342353 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00366-005-0303-0[`doi:10.1007/s00366-005-0303-0 ` ] . gross , p. w. , and p. r. kotiuga ( 2004 ) , _ electromagnetic theory and computation : a topological approach _ , volume 48 of _ mathematical sciences research institute publications_. cambridge university press , cambridge . hairer , e. , c. lubich , and g. wanner ( 2006 ) , _ geometric numerical integration _ , volume 31 of _ springer series in computational mathematics_. springer - verlag , berlin , second edition . structure - preserving algorithms for ordinary differential equations . wang , k. , weiwei , y. tong , m. desbrun , and p. schrder ( 2006 ) , edge subdivision schemes and the construction of smooth vector fields . in _ siggraph 06 : acm siggraph 2006 papers _ , pages 10411048 . acm press , new york . http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1179352.1141991[`doi:10.1145/1179352.1141991 ` ] . Abstract:
[ "in this paper , we develop a structure - preserving discretization of the lagrangian framework for electromagnetism , combining techniques from _ variational integrators _ and _ discrete differential forms_. this leads to a general family of variational , multisymplectic numerical methods for solving maxwell s equations that automatically preserve key symmetries and invariants . in doing so , we demonstrate several new results , which apply both to some well - established numerical methods and to new methods introduced here . first , we show that yee s finite - difference time - domain ( fdtd ) scheme , along with a number of related methods , are multisymplectic and derive from a discrete lagrangian variational principle . second , we generalize the yee scheme to unstructured meshes , not just in space but in @xmath0-dimensional spacetime . this relaxes the need to take uniform time steps , or even to have a preferred time coordinate at all . finally , as an example of the type of methods that can be developed within this general framework , we introduce a new _ asynchronous variational integrator _ ( avi ) for solving maxwell s equations . these results are illustrated with some prototype simulations that show excellent energy and conservation behavior and lack of spurious modes , even for an irregular mesh with asynchronous time stepping ." ]
12,268
12,268
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: i came to copenhagen in september , 1967 , holding one - year s fellowship from the nishina foundation in japan . it was my first visit to foreign institutes , where i had to understand physics discussed in english . indeed , it took several years for me to understand some physics which i heard in english . everything was new and interesting to me , but among others , i remember clearly `` experimental meeting at nbi (= niels bohr institute ) '' at 11 oclock on monday morning , in which i learned how to talk with and study from experimentalists . new experimental data presented by experimentalists coming from all over the world were of course exciting , however , it was my strong impression that people were more carefully watching the questions and reactions by aage bohr and ben mottelson to those presentations . in the sixties at nbi we could meet physicists from both west ( usa , canada , europe , australia , etc . ) and east ( soviet union , east europe , china , etc . ) , and we became good friends for life after we spent our younger days together . my stay in copenhagen , which at the beginning i intended for one year , became for three years . though i once left copenhagen in the summer of 1970 , i came back to europe already in 1971 and to copenhagen in 1973 . since 1971 i helped the completion of bohr and mottelson s book , nuclear structure vol . ii , which was finally published in 1975 . the book is not at all just a textbook , but the entire volume is a big article , which is full of their original ideas and deeply - going understanding of physics . during those years i learned an enormous amount of physics from bohr and mottelson especially because i could directly talk with them and ask questions to them almost whenever i wanted . it was the exclusively precious and happy time and days in my life as a physicist , which i never forget , and i want to express my heartfelt thanks to aage and ben . in the present article i write my personal overview of five topics that have been centrally placed in the field of nuclear - structure physics in respective decades . those topics perhaps except for the most recently developed drip - line physics have been developed in the way either strictly followed from the ideas of bohr and mottelson or strongly influenced by their way of thinking physics , and the topics are those , the study of which i myself have also eagerly worked in . in sec . ii particle - vibration coupling , in sec . iii one - particle motion in deformed and rotating potentials , and yrast spectroscopy in high - spin physics , in sec . iv triaxial shape of nuclei , in sec . v nuclear structure as neutron - drip - line approaches , and in sec . vi nuclear shell - structure in oblate deformation are presented , while conclusions and discussions are given in sec . in the self - consistent system such as nuclei one - particle motion and collective phenomena are strongly related . elementary modes of excitations may be associated with excitations of individual particles or they may represent collective vibrations of the density , shape , or some other parameter that characterizes the equilibrium configuration . the vibrational motion in nuclei is so profoundly affected by the shell structure of one - particle motion that it presents an excellent example of the interweaving of one - particle and collective degrees of freedom @xcite . in the nuclear system the possibility of collective shape oscillations is strongly suggested by the fact that the ground states of some nuclei are described by densities and mean fields that are spherical while others are deformed . consequently , one might expect to find intermediate situations in which the shape undergoes rather large fluctuations away from the equilibrium shape . in addition to the modes which have classical analogs , in the nuclear spectra vibrational modes unique in a quantal system , such as those involving charge exchange or excitation of the nucleonic spins or oscillations in the pair field , are known and studied . in the following of this section we take shape oscillations as an example of particle - vibration coupling , because experimental study of various properties of them has been carried out for years and the resulting data are accumulated . the density variations associated with the vibrational motion make corresponding variations in the average potential . the distortion of the average potential gives a coupling between the degrees of freedom of the vibration and individual particles @xcite , @xmath0 where @xmath1 where @xmath2 expresses the radius of the average static potential , @xmath3 , for which we use the form of woods - saxon potential . either radial form on the r.h.s . of ( [ eq : pvc - kr ] ) that is used in various publications gives nearly the same numerical results because the quantity @xmath4 is concentrated on the nuclear surface , though the first form can be more reasonable . one may consider a number of effects which arise from the coupling : for example , the renormalization of the properties of both particles and vibrations , or a self - consistent description of the vibrational motion itself in terms of one - particle degree of freedom , or the effect of the exclusion principle between the degrees of freedom of particles and those involved in the vibrational modes , as well as the orthogonality of different modes . in particular , in the case of the coupling being weak enough to be treated by perturbation , one can systematically calculate those various effects , and the comparison between the calculated quantities and the observed ones provides a quantitative information on the validity of our understanding of the structure of the basic particle - vibration coupling . particle - vibration coupling in low - lying quadrupole vibrations is often too strong to be quantitatively treated by perturbation . in contrast , low - lying octupole vibrations provide the data , by which our understanding can be quantitatively tested . a beautiful example is related to the octupole vibration of the doubly magic nucleus , @xmath5pb@xmath6 . there are many kinds of data on octupole vibrations in neighboring nuclei of @xmath7pb @xcite , which were nicely interpreted in terms of the particle - vibration coupling . in the following we take the septuplet of the octupole vibration , @xmath8 $ ] , observed in @xmath9bi@xmath6 , as a beautiful example of the particle - vibration coupling . in fig . 1 observed low - lying energy spectra of @xmath5pb@xmath6 and @xmath9bi@xmath6 that are relevant to the present discussion are shown . pb@xmath6 and @xmath9bi@xmath6 that are relevant to the present discussion . excitation energies are expressed in mev . ] in the calculations of respective observed quantities shown in the following the contributions only in the lowest - order perturbation were taken into account . however , it is important to note that all contributions in the lowest order are included when differential equations appropriate for respective contributions were numerically integrated instead of expanding the wave - functions in terms of a given finite basis . a number of beautiful experiments on many faces of the septuplet members have been carried out especially during the sixties and the seventies , such as energies , decay scheme and octupole strength of respective members , one - nucleon transfer reaction cross section to populate some members . the properties of the octupole vibration itself in @xmath7pb such as the transition density , quadrupole moment , and double - phonon states were also explored . observed data in connection with this octupole vibration could be in almost all cases treated by perturbation and gave a firm support for our understanding of the shape ( surface ) oscillation and the related particle - vibration coupling . the detailed comparison between experimental and calculated results can be found in available publications . see , for example , @xcite . therefore , in the following i show only two examples ; ( i ) energy shifts and the decay scheme of the septuplet members of @xmath10bi and ( ii ) the radial transition density of the octupole vibration of @xmath7pb . parameters used as an input in the numerical calculations are the two observed quantities in @xmath7pb ; the observed vibrational energy , 2.614 mev , and the observed vibrational strength , @xmath11 = 32 @xmath12 , which is used to obtain the matrix element of @xmath13 . the value of 32 @xmath12 was taken from coulomb excitation experiments @xcite . in table 1 calculated energy shifts ( in the 2nd - order perturbation of the particle - vibration coupling ) and the decay scheme ( in the 1st - order perturbation of the particle - vibration coupling ) of the septuplet members in @xmath10bi are compared with experimental ones . the observed energy splitting of the septuplet is 250 kev compared with 350 kev of the calculated one . we note a remarkable agreement between the calculated and experimental decay schemes , in particular , six @xmath14-values obtained using @xmath15^{2 } = 0.14 \ , e^{2}$ ] , while it is known to be extremely difficult to predict @xmath14 values in strongly - hindered low - energy e1 transitions in nuclei . this agreement may be used for supporting our basic understanding of the present particle - vibration coupling and the surface vibration . in addition , the obtained value of @xmath16 agrees approximately with the value @xcite estimated by taking into account the reduction coming from both the center of mass motion and the presence of the isovector giant dipole resonance . [ ht ] the upper part expresses the radial transition charge density of the 3@xmath17 state at 2.614 mev in @xmath7pb . the solid line shows the calculated value @xcite , while for the experimental values the dashed band was taken from ref . @xcite and the crosspoints were from ref . the lower part of the figure denotes the calculated charge density of the ground state of @xmath7pb . the scale of the x - axis in the lower part is the same as the one in the upper part . the figure is adapted from fig . 1 of ref . , title="fig : " ] in fig . 2 the calculated radial transition density ( in the 1st - order perturbation of the particle - vibration coupling ) of the 3@xmath17 state of @xmath7pb @xcite is compared with those obtained from electron inelastic scatterings . the large peak around the surface can be understood as a feature of the shape oscillation . the position of the first minimum around 5 fm coincides closely with the @xmath18-value where the ground - state density reaches the maximum , noting that the radial transition density is approximately proportional to the radial derivative of the static density . the structure of the two small peaks inside the nucleus depends on the microscopic shell - structure of the octupole vibration in addition to the general quantum - mechanical oscillatory structure of the static density . another example in somewhat lighter - mass region , which exhibits a very similar coupling between particles and an octupole vibration , was reported in 1982 @xcite . the septuplet members in @xmath19gd@xmath20 , @xmath21 with @xmath22 = 1/2 , ... , 13/2 , in which the octupole vibration 3@xmath17 of @xmath23gd at @xmath24 = 1.579 mev with @xmath11=@xmath25 was coupled to the 83rd odd - neutron in the @xmath26 orbit , were identified except the @xmath27 member . due to the dominance of the proton @xmath28 component in the 3@xmath17 state , not all properties of the septuplet members could be analyzed by perturbation . however , it is unique in the case of the octupole vibration of @xmath23gd that the two - octupole - phonon angular - momentum - stretched state , [ ( @xmath29@xmath30 , in @xmath31gd was experimentally identified and the pretty strong anharmonicity in both the energy and the e3 transition rate was subsequently analyzed @xcite . the very basic description of nuclear many - body systems is the ( self - consistent ) mean - field approximation to the many - body problem . in particular , shape is the property of mean field . the ground states of some nuclei are described by densities and mean fields that are spherical , while others are deformed . in fig . 3 the even - even nuclei , of which the ground state is observed to be deformed , are shown . the deformation results from one - particle shell - structure , namely bunching of one - particle levels , in contrast to the prediction of the liquid - drop model . for the nucleus as a quantum many - body system the presence of deformation is a necessary condition for the occurrence of collective rotation , and the symmetry of the deformation determines the structure of rotation . the most important deformation around the ground states of nuclei is the axially - symmetric quadrupole deformation corresponding to a spheroidal shape ( cigar or pancake ) . axially - symmetric nuclei can not perform a collective rotation about the symmetry axis . if some nuclei show deformation with a given symmetry it is simplest and most convenient to start with the mean field , which has the same symmetry . one - particle motion in quadrupole - deformed potentials was solved in the fifties almost at the same time by three groups @xcite . among them , nilsson model @xcite has been used by many people in the analysis of data , presumably because the application of the nilsson model using modified oscillator potentials to actual nuclei was easiest and very practical . the spectrum of one - particle orbits as a function of deformation , so - called nilsson diagram , has played an invaluable role in the study of deformed nuclei . ( in the present article the word , nilsson diagram , is used for the diagrams of one - particle energies as a function of quadrupole deformation using general one - body potentials such as woods - saxon or hf potentials , and not only for the diagram drawn by using modified oscillator potentials . ) nilsson diagrams have been extremely useful for analyzing the data on deformed nuclei . this is mainly because the major part of the ( @xmath32 ) channel of the two - body quadrupole - quadrupole interaction is absorbed into the mean field . consequently , the picture of one - particle motion in the deformed potential works for deformed nuclei much better than that of one - particle motion in spherical potentials for spherical nuclei . for example , see the successful quantitative analysis of various kinds of experimental data of well - deformed ( especially odd - a ) nuclei such as @xmath33 mg , @xmath33al , @xmath34 tb , @xmath35tm , @xmath36yb , @xmath36lu , @xmath37lu , @xmath37hf , @xmath38u , @xmath39np , @xmath40pu presented in ref . @xcite . the field of nuclear high - spin physics was activated by the observation of the back - bending phenomena @xcite , which was the first band - crossing ( between the ground - band and the s - band ) along the yrast line in well - deformed collectively - rotating nuclei . during the seventies the possibility of studying nuclei with very large angular - momentum was opened up , thanks to the facilities of accelerating heavy - ions . collisions between two heavy nuclei could produce meta - stable compound systems with large angular - momenta . indeed , in heavy - ion collisions in the late seventies it was possible to produce compound nuclei with angular momentum all the way up to the limit set by the fission instability . the maximum value of angular momentum which nuclei can accommodate is the order of 100@xmath41 for nuclei with @xmath42 @xcite . the study of rapidly rotating nuclei provided the opportunity for exploring new aspects of nuclear dynamics @xcite . when the angular momentum is accommodated by a quantal system such as a nucleus , one recognizes that there are two fundamental ways of building the angular momentum @xcite . the first one is collective rotation in the presence of a significant amount of deformation , while the second one is to build the angular momentum by spin alignments of individual particles when the angular momentum is directed along an axis of symmetry of the nucleus . in actual nuclei we encounter situations in which the increment of angular momentum is achieved partly by increasing the frequency of collective rotation and partly by rearranging the occupation of one - particle orbits ( namely , by increasing the particle alignments ) . in fact , the collective rotational spectra together with the crossing of the ground band with the s - band are characteristic of this kind of situation . special interest in nuclear high - spin states attaches to the region in the neighborhood of the yrast line representing the lowest energy for a given angular - momentum . in this yrast region the nucleus is cold in the sense that almost the entire excitation energy of the nucleus is consumed in generating the angular momentum . therefore , the structure in the yrast region is ordered with simple excitation modes , and the study of those may be expected to give important nuclear - structure information on how the nucleus responds to the large centrifugal forces associated with rotation . the path that the yrast line of actual nuclei will follow in deformation space with increasing angular - momentum will result from the competition between the macroscopic centrifugal distortion effect and the quantal effects associated with shell - structure . in the yrast spectroscopy of medium - heavy nuclei an important role has been played by particles in high - j orbits , such as 1g@xmath43- , 1h@xmath44- , 1i@xmath45- and 1j@xmath46-orbits . this is because the parity of high - j orbits is different from that of other one - particle orbits in respective major shells , therefore , both in quadrupole deformation and under rotation particles in high - j orbits do not mix with those in neighboring orbits . that means , the wave functions of particles in high - j orbits have less ambiguity . furthermore , as soon as rotation sets in , particles in high - j orbits start to align due to the particularly large coriolis coupling , while particles in neighboring other orbits still contribute to collective rotation . consequently , the states consisting of high - j - shell configurations easily appear in the neighborhood of the yrast line . a typical example is that the intrinsic structure of the s - band contains a large alignment coming from the aligned two quasiparticles in the relevant high - j orbit , in contrast to the absence of such alignment in the ground band , at the angular momentum of the band crossing . the basis for the analysis of shell - structure effects on nuclear high - spin states is the study of one - particle motion in rotating potentials . the importance of understanding the physics in the yrast region , especially in terms of one - particle motion in rotating potentials , was repeatedly emphasized by bohr and mottelson during the seventies . the cranking model is easily treated and the rotational frequency appears as an explicit parameter . indeed , the major part of the analysis of nuclear high - spin phenomena has been carried out in terms of cranking models of various types . in particular , the so - called routhian diagram , namely the diagram plotting one quasiparticle energies in the rotating frame as a function of cranking frequency , played for years a central role in the analysis of nuclear high - spin data . i remember that around the middle of the seventies aage bohr was repeating to say to us working at the niels bohr institute that one should draw and study the routhian diagram for fixed deformation and pairing parameters . ( at that time i stupidly thought that such simplified routhian diagrams might be qualitatively excellent for getting ideas and ways of understanding physics , but they would hardly be useful for practical numerical applications . ) in this connection , i later realized that , for example , without plotting such routhian diagrams it would have been indeed difficult to notice the fact that the interaction strength between the ground band and the s - band , namely the sharpness of backbending phenomena , is an oscillating function of the degree of high - j - shell filling @xcite . the extended study with numerical works using realistic configuration spaces was eventually carried out by r. bengtsson and s. frauendorf @xcite , and the routhian diagrams of such a simple type turned out to be extremely useful and have been successfully used in the analysis of high - spin data for the following years . however , one should keep in mind that the uniform rotation of a system , which is a basic assumption of the cranking model , may become a poor approximation under certain circumstances , because the presence of fluctuations in the collective rotational frequency is recognized if one treats more reasonably the exchange of angular momentum between individual particles and the potential produced by the rest of the system @xcite . an example outside the applicability of the cranking model in its simplest form is the description of the crossings of the bands with a large difference of spin alignments , irrespective of whether the parameters in the model are chosen self - consistently or not . the inapplicability comes from the fact that a mixing of the two bands for a given rotational frequency is basically considered in the cranking model , while the two bands should interact for a given angular momentum @xcite . the experimental front of high - spin physics made a tremendous progress in the decades after the observation of back - bending , especially due to the development of multi - gamma - ray detectors , which had a resolution of orders greater than that of the last generation , and @xmath47 or @xmath48 spectrometers ; nordball and tessa @xmath49 eurogam and gasp @xmath49 euroball and gammasphere . new frontiers were opened in the nuclear high - spin physics , when the superdeformed band in @xmath50dy@xmath51 was reported @xcite by finally observing gamma - ray spectra of discrete transitions in the decay sequence of the superdeformed band of @xmath52dy extending to @xmath53 @xmath54 , thanks to the development of detectors . the observation of the discrete gamma - rays could directly and clearly show the presence of the superdeformed band , compared with the information extracted previously from the painstaking analysis of complicated continuum gamma - rays . it is noted that the largest angular momentum , which was reported in discrete line studies before the discovery of the superdeformed band , was only 46 @xmath54 . because of the large moment of inertia of superdeformed nuclei , the large angular - momentum needed for the study of such systems does not necessarily mean large rotational frequencies . consequently , the unique behavior of particles in high - j orbits could largely remain also in the analysis of superdeformed bands . the shape of superdeformation in nuclei , where the axis ratio of the prolately - deformed shape is approximately 2:1 , was known already in the sixties as ( low - spin ) fission isomers in actinide nuclei @xcite and was interpreted as the result of the shell - structure which appears first for much larger quadrupole - deformation ( @xmath55 in medium - heavy nuclei ) than the one known in nuclear ground states . in subsequent years the observation of super- or highly - deformed bands was reported also in other mass region than @xmath56=150 , such as @xmath56=130 @xcite and 190 @xcite , though the relevant shape was not always close to 2:1 . before 1975 the view might have been accepted that there were nuclei that were statically deformed and they were located far away from closed shells , while there were nuclei that were spherical and they were located in the neighborhood of closed - shell regions , though in some nuclei located on the border of spherical and deformed nuclei the simultaneous presence of the low - lying states with spherical and deformed shapes was already recognized . thanks to the marvelous development of experimental techniques in high - spin physics , collective rotational bands were found at the excitation energy of several mev also in some nuclei such as @xmath57pb , @xmath58sn and @xmath59ca isotopes @xcite , which are at least semi - magic and were supposed to be spherical . while it has been known that for a given nucleus hartree - fock calculations often predicted local energy - minima at several different deformations , the possible presence of such several shapes in a given nucleus has been indeed confirmed thanks to the modern experimental technique . in the present special issue of physica scripta i expect a number of contributions by specialists in the field of high - spin physics . therefore , to those contributions i would leave to show a tremendous amount of beautiful results obtained from all detailed numerical works in comparison with exciting and impressive experimental data . theoretically the existence of nuclear deformation other than axially - symmetric deformation was predicted , and it has been a great challenge to find the predicted axially - asymmetric ( triaxial ) deformation of nuclei . in order to pin down triaxial deformation , it is essential to find the phenomena which are unique in axially - asymmetric shape . in connection with available experimental data on high - j configurations in the yrast spectroscopy , some phenomena such as the signature - dependence of b(e2:i @xmath49 i@xmath601 ) values in odd - a nuclei and anomalous signature - splitting of routhians in odd - a and odd - odd nuclei , were theoretically suggested as the evidence for triaxial shape @xcite . however , before 2000 a very clear and firm evidence for stable triaxial shape was hardly obtained experimentally . on the other hand , the two phenomena , wobbling excitation modes and chiral bands , are unique in triaxial shape and were intensively searched for by using the advanced technique developed in high - spin physics . observation of beautiful wobbling excitation modes was reported in the beginning of the 21st century , while , in my opinion , experimental data which clearly pin down chiral bands have not yet been obtained though several candidates for chiral bands have been reported . in this section i describe the present understanding of these two phenomena . nuclei with a triaxial shape can rotate about any of the principal axes showing rich spectra of collective rotation . though the rotation about the axis with the largest moment of inertia is energetically cheapest , while freezing the intrinsic structure a series of rotational bands can be built by transferring some angular momentum to the other two axes . the family of the rotational bands is formulated in terms of vibrational excitations . the classical analog of this wobbling motion is the spinning motion of an asymmetric top , but the motion in the nuclear system is quantized and expressed in terms of the wobbling phonon number ( @xmath61 ) . a family of rotational bands with wobbling excitations can be pinned down by specific electromagnetic decay properties between them . this quantized wobbling phonon picture was first proposed by a. bohr and b. r. mottelson described in @xcite . in 2001 such a wobbling band , a one - phonon wobbling excitation , was discovered in the nucleus @xmath62lu@xmath63 @xcite . one year later , in 2002 the next wobbling excitation , a two - phonon rotational band , was reported in the same nucleus @xcite . in this experiment high spin states of @xmath64lu were populated using a @xmath65si beam and a @xmath66la target . the emitted gamma - rays were measured with the euroball detector system . the electromagnetic nature of the decay transitions from the newly observed band is analyzed and the results clearly show the two - phonon nature of the wobbling motion in good agreement with calculations , in which the intrinsic degree of freedom of the rotational bands in @xmath64lu is represented by one highly - aligned quasiproton in the @xmath67 shell @xcite . the state with high - j aligned particles favors a specific ( triaxial ) shape @xcite depending on the degree of the j - shell filling . the @xmath68-value favored by the aligned i@xmath45 proton in @xmath64lu is around + 20@xmath69 ( in the so - called lund convention states with large alignments can easily appear in the neighborhood of the yrast line because of the relatively small rotational angular - momentum ( and thereby small rotational energy ) needed for building a given total angular - momentum . furthermore , using a particle - rotor model , in which one quasiparticle of i@xmath45 protons is coupled to a triaxial core , it was shown @xcite that in the presence of one high - j aligned quasiparticle and for the @xmath68-value strongly favored by the fully - aligned high - j particle the wobbling excitation of the collective rotational angular - momentum of the core appears as the yrare band in a certain range of angular momentum and the electromagnetic transitions between the yrast and yrare bands show a unique pattern . the two - phonon wobbling excitation observed in @xmath64lu is one of the most exotic properties of the spinning nucleus . the observation has been possible not least due to an increased efficiency in the detection of gamma - rays with high resolution germanium spectrometers which have been developed and became available during the last decades of the 20th century . the observation of a two - phonon excitation , of which the relevant degree of freedom is collective rotation , amplifies the uniqueness of the finding for nuclear wobbling . the nucleus has revealed its exploitation of the quantal wobbling degree of freedom which proves the existence of triaxial nuclei and adds a new dimension to the description of a rotating nucleus . since 2002 the observation of the rotational bands , which showed spectroscopic properties ( though often only energies ) very similar to those of @xmath64lu , were reported in neighboring nuclei including @xmath70lu , indicating the presence of the wobbling bands also in those nuclei . however , the original data on the nucleus @xmath64lu are so far most beautiful and best to pin down the characteristic features of not only the energies and spin - parity but also electromagnetic properties and the two - phonon wobbling excitation . therefore , in the following i briefly describe the observed data on @xmath64lu and their interpretation . the essence of the experimental data on the wobbling excitations of @xmath64lu @xcite is shown in figs . 4 and 5 , compared with the calculated results obtained by using the particle - rotor model , in which one high - j quasiparticle is coupled to the core of triaxial shape @xcite . the moments of inertia and alignments of the three tsd ( triaxial , strongly deformed ) bands , tsd1 , tsd2 and tsd3 , are nearly identical , and the intrinsic structure of those tsd bands is understood as containing an aligned high - j (= i@xmath45 ) proton . tsd2 is identified as the one - phonon ( @xmath71 ) wobbling band built on the yrast tsd1 ( @xmath72 ) , while tsd3 as the two - phonon ( @xmath73 ) wobbling band . the identification of the two - phonon band is based on , among others , the unusually large ( at this high - spin ) b(e2 ; tsd3 @xmath49 tsd2 ) value in agreement with both the phonon picture and the calculated result of the particle - rotor model @xcite . it is also noted that very small values of b(e2 ; tsd3,@xmath22 @xmath49 tsd1,@xmath74 ) are in agreement with the assignment of tsd3 and tds1 as @xmath61=2 and 0 , respectively . the @xmath68-value in the calculation ( @xmath75 + 20@xmath69 ) was fixed by the observed ratios , b(e2 ; tsd2,i @xmath49 tsd1,i@xmath601)/b(e2 ; tsd2,i @xmath49 tsd2 , i@xmath602 ) and b(e2 ; tsd3,i @xmath49 tsd2 , i@xmath601)/b(e2 ; tsd3,i @xmath49 tsd3,i@xmath602 ) , which are insensitive to used values of moments of inertia but are strongly increasing functions of @xmath68 , especially for @xmath76 . it should be also mentioned that for nuclei with z@xmath7771 and n@xmath7794 ultimate cranker calculations @xcite predicted triaxial shapes ( @xmath78 ) with large quadrupole deformations ( @xmath79 ) for all combinations of parity and signature in the region of angular momenta , which are relevant for the observed tsd bands of @xmath64lu . the local minimum with @xmath80 is generally lowest , and at the minimum the i@xmath45 orbital is lowest in energy of the proton system with the favored signature @xmath811/2 where @xmath22 = @xmath82 . m1 transitions between @xmath83 bands are in general strongly reduced as seen in fig . this is because in the text - book example @xcite namely in the absence of the high - j aligned particle , the total angular - momentum @xmath84 is the only vector in the system , thus , the magnetic dipole operator is proportional to @xmath85 . then , m1 transitions should vanish in the case of the isotropic @xmath86-factor in the body - fixed system . in the presence of fully - aligned intrinsic angular - momentum @xmath87 and when possible quantum - fluctuations are neglected , the argument goes in a similar way to the above case when @xmath84 above is replaced by @xmath88 where @xmath88 expresses the rotational angular - momentum of the even - even core . in contrast , the b(e2 ; @xmath89 value is proportional to @xmath90 . the observed magnitudes as well as the zigzag pattern of both b(m1 ) and b(e2 ) values are in good agreement with the wobbling picture obtained from the model consisting of one @xmath67 quasiparticle coupled to the triaxial - rotor . in particular , it is interesting to note that in fig . 5 the zigzag pattern of both b(e2 ) and b(m1 ) values of @xmath91 transitions in the wobbling regime is opposite to the one in the cranking regime . furthermore , in the cranking regime one expects that for @xmath91 transitions at high spins the b(m1 ) values are the order of unity , while the b(e2)values are the order of @xmath92 . thus , it is seen that the expectation from the cranking model totally disagrees with the observation . spontaneous formation of handedness or chirality is a subject of general interest in molecular physics , the characterization of elementary particles , and in optical physics . the occurrence of chirality in a nuclear structure was considered theoretically @xcite and , subsequently , experimental level schemes in some odd - odd nuclei ( for example , @xmath93pr@xmath94 ) exhibiting the patterns similar to the predicted ones have been reported @xcite . the total hamiltonian for the nuclear system is taken to be invariant under the exchange of the right- and left - handed geometry . chirality in triaxial nuclei is characterized by the presence of three angular - momentum vectors , which are generally noncoplanar and thereby make it possible to define chirality . one of the three angular - momenta is the collective rotational angular - momentum , while the other two in odd - odd nuclei are , in practice , angular - momenta of quasiproton and quasineutron in high - j orbits . the hallmark of nuclear chirality is the observation of two almost degenerate @xmath91 rotational bands , chiral bands , having the same parity . those almost degenerate states are expected to appear only after an appreciable amount of collective rotation develops , while for higher rotational frequency the basis for chirality , namely the noncoplanar structure of the three angular - momenta , will be destroyed . the reason is that in order to make a given large total angular - momentum , it is cheapest to align all constituent angular - momenta to the direction of collective rotation . thus , chiral bands may be found only in a limited intermediate region of angular - momentum . observed so - called chiral bands , two @xmath95 = 1 bands , are typically a few hundreds kev apart and one must find a reasonable explanation of this energy difference . furthermore , though the presence of two close - lying bands may indicate chiral geometry , this geometry can be pinned down in a more definitive way if electromagnetic transition probabilities expected for the chiral bands are experimentally confirmed . the trivial behavior of electromagnetic transition probabilities or the trivial selection - rule expected in general chiral pair - bands is : for the states with @xmath96 the corresponding probabilities and moments in the two bands should be identical or in practice almost the same . namely , when chiral geometry is realized , observed two chiral - degenerate states may be written as @xmath97 where left- and right - handed geometry states are denoted by @xmath98 and @xmath99 , respectively . for @xmath96 it is expected that @xmath100 where @xmath101 expresses electromagnetic operators . then , within the chiral pair - bands one expects @xmath102 in addition , in ref . @xcite the selection rule derived from a special case of odd - odd nuclei , in which the orbits of both odd - neutron and odd - proton are the same high - j , was obtained by using the particle - rotor model in which one - proton- and one - neutron - quasiparticle were coupled to a triaxial core @xcite . the majority of observed two close - lying @xmath91 bands in odd - odd nuclei around @xmath103 @xcite belongs to this special case where j = h@xmath44 . in this case , an additional symmetry exists in the model hamiltonian and an associated quantum number can be obtained . using this quantum number a further selection rule for electromagnetic transitions was derived in an unambiguous manner @xcite . to my knowledge , two close - lying @xmath91 bands observed in odd - odd nuclei , which approximately satisfy this selection rule , are not yet found . as a matter of fact , we have not yet observed two close - lying @xmath95=1 bands , of which electromagnetic transition probabilities approximately follow even the trivial selection - rule . thus , we have to say that in spite of the nice theoretical idea we have not yet obtained experimental data which show the presence of chiral bands . this fact may come from the transient character of chiral bands , which can survive only in a certain range of angular momentum . the detailed description of our present knowledge about chiral bands together with so far available experimental data will be presented in other contributions to this special issue . an example of the systematic change of energies of one - particle orbits due to weak binding which we learn in traditional textbooks is thomas - ehrman shift . the reduction of the coulomb energy for the loosely - bound proton orbits and for the unbound resonance states is called thomas - ehrman shift . a typical example is : the rather large difference ( 370 kev ) in excitation energies of the s@xmath104 levels between mirror nuclei , e@xmath105 = 0.87 mev in @xmath106o@xmath107 where the neutron separation energy s(n)=4.14 mev and e@xmath105 = 0.50 mev in @xmath108f@xmath109 where the proton separation energy s(p)=0.60 mev , can be explained in terms of the reduction in coulomb energy associated with the loosely bound proton @xcite . in the case of protons the effect of weak binding on energies and wave functions can be seen only in such very light nuclei because the height of coulomb barrier becomes increasingly high as z increases . in the present section i confine my attention to the neutron - drip - line nuclei despite the significant interest that is also associated with the proton - rich side ( among others , nuclear astrophysical importance , neutron - proton correlations in the z@xmath77n region , new opportunities provided by @xmath110 and @xmath111 decays ) . the study of unstable nuclei , especially neutron - drip - line nuclei which contain very weakly - bound neutrons , has opened a new field in the research of the structure of finite quantum - mechanical systems . the study is important not only because of the interests in nuclear astrophysics such as understanding the production of energy and the synthesis of elements in stars and during stellar events , but also because it provides the opportunity to learn the properties of fermion systems with very loosely bound particles , some density of which can extend to the region far outside the region of the main density of the system . because the fermi level of drip - line nuclei lies close to the continuum , both weakly - bound and positive - energy one - particle levels play a crucial role in the many - body correlations of those nuclei . among various exciting phenomena which have been explored in the study of the structure of drip - line nuclei i pick up the following two topics in this section . first , we can find the systematic change of neutron shell - structure , as s(n ) decreases and approaches zero or even negative values ( namely , one - particle resonances ) . as a result of it , traditional magic numbers known for stable nuclei may be changed and , furthermore , nuclei with closed - shell configurations in the traditional stable nuclei may become deformed . i describe our understanding of these phenomena in the following first subsection , while in the second subsection i touch the halo phenomena in spherical and deformed nuclei which can be found along the neutron - drip - line having some components of weakly - bound @xmath112=0 or 1 neutrons . recent experimental data obtained by using radioactive ion beams reveal that the neutron numbers such as @xmath113=8 , 20 and 28 are no longer magic numbers in some nuclei toward the neutron - drip - line . in traditional stable nuclei the neutron separation energy @xmath114 is typically 7 - 10 mev . thus , the information on one - particle shell - structure around the energy has been easily obtained experimentally . the prominent change of the level structure in the region of @xmath115 mev can be seen , for example , in fig . 2 - 30 of ref . @xcite , where the energies of neutron orbits in spherical woods - saxon potentials are shown . when the potential strength becomes weaker by decreasing the mass - number @xmath56 , thereby decreasing the radius of the potential , eigenvalues of all orbits @xmath116 become less bound . however , neutron - orbits with larger @xmath112 ( thus , larger @xmath117 ) lose the binding energy more rapidly than those with smaller @xmath118 . this is because due to the presence of higher centrifugal barrier the major part of the wave functions of the orbits with larger @xmath118 stays inside the potential and , thus , eigenvalues @xmath119 are more sensitive to the strength of the potential than those of the orbits with smaller @xmath120 ) . taking a finite square - well potential as an example , the probability for bound one - neutron wave - functions to remain inside the potential in the limit of eigenvalues @xmath121 is tabulated in table ii . since the effective interactions , which can be reliably used in hartree - fock ( hf ) calculations of unstable nuclei far away from the stability line , are not yet established , in the present article we use the woods - saxon potential for nuclear one - body potential , of which parameters are taken from p.239 of ref . @xcite unless otherwise stated . weakening of the woods - saxon potential can be done by reducing either the potential radius or the potential depth . the two ways of weakening change the shape of the potential in respective manners . in fig . 6 an example of neutron one - particle energies as a function of the depth of a spherical woods - saxon potential is given . it is noted that as one - particle energy @xmath122 approaches zero the @xmath123 level approaches the @xmath124 level and may eventually become lower than the latter . realizing this result the possible neutron magic number n=16 was suggested in ref . @xcite . in the following i use the simple argument : a large one - particle level density around the fermi level at the spherical point may lead to a deformation . the argument is based on the following known fact : in very light nuclei the many - body pair - correlation may be neglected in a good approximation . then , nuclei with a few nucleons outside a closed shell can be already deformed , because using the near degeneracy of one - particle levels those nucleons have a possibility of gaining energy by breaking spherical symmetry ( jahn - teller effect @xcite ) . due to the same physics mechanism as the nearly - degenerate @xmath123 and @xmath124 levels in the case of weak binding as shown in fig . 6 , the @xmath125 and @xmath126 levels become nearly degenerate in the case of weak binding or low - lying resonant levels @xcite . the nilsson diagram based on a deformed woods - saxon potential which is appropriate for @xmath127mg@xmath128 @xcite is shown in fig . the @xmath129 and @xmath125 resonant levels for @xmath130=0 are found at + 5.22 and + 0.018 mev with the widths 2.08 and 0.005 mev , respectively , where one - particle resonance in deformed potentials is defined using the eigenphase formalism @xcite . using the eigenenergy @xmath131 = @xmath600.66 mev , the distance between the @xmath126 and @xmath125 levels is 680 kev , which is very small compared with the distance obtained in the case that both levels are well bound , as known from the presence of the magic number n=28 in stable nuclei . this near degeneracy of the @xmath126 and @xmath125 levels at @xmath130=0 directly means the disappearance of the n=28 energy gap ( or magic number ) and leads to the fact that the n = 20 - 26 nuclei with weakly - bound neutrons in the @xmath126-@xmath125 shells may prefer being deformed in the case that the proton configuration allows the deformation @xcite . in recent experiments @xcite the even - even mg - isotopes ( n=22 - 26 ) towards the neutron - drip - line are found to be indeed deformed by observing small values of @xmath132 and possible @xmath133 ratios , while the odd - n nuclei , @xmath134ne@xmath135 and @xmath127mg@xmath128 , are duly interpreted as deformed p - wave halo nuclei @xcite . interests in nuclear halo phenomena were aroused by the observation of a remarkably large interaction cross section of @xmath136li@xmath109 , which suggested a large deformation and/or a long tail in the matter distribution @xcite . the long tail is later interpreted as a two - neutron halo phenomenon . the observed neutron - halo structure makes it clear that the extreme difference in the radial motion of weakly - bound @xmath112=0 and @xmath112=1 neutrons from the radial distribution of the core particles indicates the approximate decoupling of the halo particles from the core of the nuclear system . the effects of this decoupling on pairing , deformation , and collective rotation is the interesting issue to be studied . the condition of the formation of neutron halo is that one or two least - bound neutrons have small separation energies , say @xmath137 mev , and some components of low orbital angular - momentum , @xmath112=0 or 1 . if it is one - neutron halo in spherical odd - n nuclei , the wave function of the halo neutron has the @xmath112=0 or 1 component with the probability close to unity . if it is one - neutron halo in deformed odd - n nuclei , the probability of @xmath112=0 or 1 component in the halo - neutron wave - function can be considerably smaller than unity . in the latter case the one - neutron wave - function can contain considerable amounts of high-@xmath112 components , which are spatially distributed within the same limited region as the well - bound even - even core nucleus . thus , in the reactions to which extended tail exclusively contributes , for example coulomb break - up reactions , one detects only the @xmath112=0 or 1 component of the one - neutron wave - function . this seems to be the case of coulomb break - up reactions of @xmath134ne@xmath135 @xcite and @xmath127mg@xmath128 @xcite . though the deformation of @xmath138ne and @xmath139 mg was predicted in 2007 @xcite as a result of the shell - structure of neutron - drip - line nuclei described in the previous subsection , the evidence for deformation of the core nuclei @xmath140ne and @xmath141 mg was recently reported . see refs . @xcite and @xcite , respectively . as is seen from the examples of @xmath138ne and @xmath139 mg , if nuclei are deformed , one - neutron halo can be found in many more nuclei with different neutron - numbers n than in the case that nuclei are limited to be spherical . this is because taking the example of @xmath112=0 halo , in the spherical case one - particle @xmath142-orbit is obtained only once in every @xmath143=even major - shell , where @xmath143 expresses the principal quantum - number of the harmonic oscillator ( ho ) . therefore , spherical @xmath112=0 halo may be observed only at very special drip - line nuclei , in which a neutron @xmath142-orbit lies around the fermi level . in contrast , in deformed nuclei all @xmath144 = 1/2@xmath145 intrinsic states acquire @xmath112=0 components induced by the deformation and , thus , all those @xmath144 = 1/2@xmath145 orbits have a chance to make a deformed s - wave halo if the orbits are weakly bound @xcite . needless to say , an @xmath144 = 1/2@xmath145 orbit can be created from every positive - parity orbits such as @xmath142 , @xmath146 , @xmath147 , @xmath148 , @xmath149 , ..... furthermore , the @xmath112=0 component in a given @xmath144 = 1/2@xmath145 orbit increases as the eigenvalue @xmath150 ( @xmath151 ) approaches zero , and the probability of the @xmath112=0 component approaches unity in the limit of @xmath152 @xcite . similar comments apply to the @xmath112=1 halo , because in the spherical case one - particle @xmath153- and @xmath154-orbits are obtained only once in every @xmath143=odd major shell . in contrast , in deformed nuclei @xmath144 = 1/2@xmath17 and 3/2@xmath17 intrinsic states originating from every negative - parity orbits such as @xmath153 , @xmath154 , @xmath155 , @xmath26 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 , ....... acquire @xmath112=1 components induced by the deformation , and all these orbits may make deformed @xmath112=1 halo if the orbits are weakly bound . the @xmath112=1 component in given @xmath144 = 1/2@xmath17 and 3/2@xmath17 orbits increases also in the limit of @xmath158 , but the amount of increase depends on both one - particle orbits and potentials . it is known that almost all known deformed even - even nuclei in the medium - heavy mass region can be interpreted in terms of prolate axially - symmetric dominantly quadrupole deformed shape . in the absence of pair correlation one obtains the number of prolate systems approximately equal to that of oblate ones in the simple models such as one - major - shell harmonic - oscillator or single - j shell . however , when hf calculations with appropriate effective interactions are performed in many well - bound nuclei , the dominance of prolate shape except for very light nuclei is obtained in agreement with the experimental observations . in my opinion , the nature of the element responsible for the overwhelming dominance of prolate shape has not yet been adequately understood . figure 6 - 48 of ref . @xcite expresses the single - particle spectrum for axially - symmetric quadrupole - deformed oscillator potentials and the resulting magic numbers for ( @xmath159 ) = ( 1:2 ) , ( 1:1 ) and ( 2:1 ) . the magic numbers for spherical shape ( 1:1 ) are well known in textbooks for years . on the other hand , the prominent shell - structure with the prolate shape ( 2:1 ) has played an important role in understanding the occurrence of both fission isomers @xcite and high - spin superdeformed bands . these phenomena have provided striking evidence for the shell structure in nuclear potentials with much larger deformations than those encountered in the ground states of heavy nuclei . though neither spin - orbit potential nor surface effects , which are important elements in nuclear potentials , are present , the shell structure seen in the oscillator potential has helped us to understand the physics in a simple terminology . in the present section it is shown that the possible oblate shape of the ground states of light well - bound nuclei , say @xmath160 , can also be easily understood in terms of the nilsson diagram based on the deformed oscillator potential . recently , the neutron - rich nucleus @xmath161si@xmath162 was reported to show a rotational spectrum @xcite , namely the ratio of observed excitation energies is @xmath133= 2.93(5 ) where @xmath163 expresses the excitation energy of the lowest level with the spin - parity @xmath164 , though the spin - assignment of the @xmath165 state is not yet actually pinned down experimentally . the observed value of @xmath132 , 770 kev , is not small compared with possibly prolate mg isotopes ( @xmath166 mg ) , of which @xmath132 is around 650 kev . the relatively low moment of inertia corresponding to @xmath167 770 kev may indicate an oblate deformation . one may wonder the reason why the nucleus with the neutron - number @xmath113=28 is deformed and not spherical , as the neutron - number 28 is a well - known magic - number in the j - j coupling shell - model and the observed neutron separation energy of @xmath168si , @xmath114= 3.6 mev , is not small . when even - even nuclei in the range of @xmath169 , of which the observed electric quadrupole moment of the first - excited 2@xmath145 state is clearly positive corresponding to an oblate shape ( or a fluctuation towards oblate shape ) , are looked for , one finds only five nuclei : @xmath170c@xmath171 , @xmath172si@xmath173 , @xmath174s@xmath175 , @xmath176s@xmath175 and @xmath177ni@xmath178 . the proton and neutron numbers of these five nuclei remind us of the magic numbers of oblate deformation with the frequency ratio ( @xmath159 ) = ( 1:2 ) and ( 2:3 ) in the deformed oscillator potential . see figure 6 - 48 of @xcite . namely , the magic numbers are z = n = 6 , 14 , 26 , 44 , ... for the ( 1:2 ) deformation while n = z = 6 , 8 , 14 , 18 , 28 , 34 , 48 , ... for the ( 2:3 ) deformation . when the neutron and/or proton numbers are equal to one of those magic numbers , the system in the deformed potential is supposed to be especially stable for respective ( @xmath159 ) deformations , though the total deformation is determined by both proton and neutron numbers . the deformation parameter @xmath130 of the ground state obtained from experimental data is relatively large for lighter nuclei , but certainly smaller than @xmath179 = 0.7 . the deformation parameter @xmath180 = @xmath181 , where @xmath182 , is equal to @xmath600.43 and @xmath600.75 for the ratio ( @xmath159 ) = ( 1:2 ) and ( 2:3 ) , respectively . thus , except for extremely light nuclei the magic numbers for the ( 2:3 ) shape may be more realistic than those for the ( 1:2 ) shape , considering @xmath183 . in fig . 8 the calculated nilsson diagram for @xmath161si@xmath162 , which is obtained based on realistic woods - saxon potentials , is shown @xcite . from fig . 8 it is seen that the energy difference , @xmath184 , is only 1.65 mev , which is smaller than the standard @xmath113=28 energy gap known in the j - j coupling shell model . indeed , the energy gap on the oblate side , which is largest around @xmath185 , is appreciably larger than the gap at @xmath186 . large energy gaps on the oblate side around @xmath185 occur at @xmath113 = 14 , 18 and 28 . those neutron - numbers are in fact exactly the magic numbers for the ( 2:3 ) deformation of the deformed oscillator potential , though the woods - saxon potentials used for drawing fig . 8 of course contain the spin - orbit potential with the standard strength . in contrast , it should be noted that the neutron numbers , at which large energy gaps are found on the prolate side of fig . 8 , such as @xmath113 = 12 , 16 , 24 and 28 around @xmath187 have no relation with the magic numbers for the prolate ( @xmath159 ) = ( 3:2 ) deformation of the oscillator potential , @xmath113 = ... , 14 , 22 , 26 , 34 , ... see also fig . 9 for the particle numbers in slightly heavier nuclei , at which large energy gaps are found in nilsson diagrams based on realistic potentials , in comparison with those based on the oscillator potential . for @xmath113=28 on the oblate side of fig . 8 four doubly - degenerate nilsson levels with @xmath143=3 are occupied , while none of @xmath143=2 orbits are unoccupied . this is the same configuration as the one at the magic number 28 of the ( 2:3 ) deformation of the oscillator potential . in short , the possible oblate deformation of @xmath168si can be understood as a result of the combination of the facts : ( i ) narrowing the spherical @xmath113=28 magic number due to the shell - structure change in very neutron - rich nuclei ; ( ii ) @xmath113=28 remains as a magic number for the moderate - size ( @xmath188 ) oblate deformation in realistic nuclear potentials , and it is in fact the magic number for the oblate ( 2:3 ) deformation of the oscillator potential ; ( iii ) oblate shape is much favored also by the proton number @xmath189=14 . note that the shell structure for protons in lighter well - bound nuclei is not so different from that for well - bound neutrons . the different correspondence between the realistic woods - saxon potential and the oscillator potential for the prolate deformation from for the oblate deformation seems to come mainly from the different behavior of the nilsson one - particle levels connected to the high - j shell ( the @xmath126 shell in the present case ) on the prolate side from on the oblate side . the different behavior of the high - j nilsson levels was discussed in detail in @xcite in relation to the numbers of oblate / prolate nuclei . due to the sign of nuclear spin - orbit potential a given high - j orbit in a spherical potential is strongly pushed down relative to other orbits belonging to the same oscillator major shell . consequently , on the oblate side the unique shell - structure coming from the presence of the high - j orbit in realistic potentials is disturbed soon after deformation sets in , and large energy gaps in the nilsson diagram occur at the particle numbers similar to those in the oscillator potential . in contrast , on the prolate side the shell structure originating from the high - j orbit in realistic potentials survives in the range of the realistic quadrupole deformation and , thus , the particle number , at which a large energy gap occurs , is considerably different from that of the oscillator potential . because of the simple property of the shell structure on the oblate side mentioned above , which is common to the woods - saxon potentials with realistic parameters ( and also realistic hf potentials ) , one may pretty reliably predict the light nuclei , of which the ground state may have an oblate shape . a good candidate for the oblate shape of light nuclei , which is immediately obtained from the above discussion , is @xmath190c@xmath173 . in my understanding the interplay between one - particle and collective degrees of freedom has been a fundamental theme in the nuclear - structure physics of bohr and mottelson . in all topics described in the present article the interplay is explicitly recognized . taking an example of particle - vibration coupling presented in sec . ii , first of all the coupling gives the relation between the vibration of an even - even nucleus and that of the neighboring odd - a nuclei . at the same time the coupling specifies the structure of the vibration of the even - even nucleus itself such as the transition density , which in turn gives the octupole vibrational strength . the self - consistent description of the vibration in terms of one - particle motion has to be satisfied . in the case that the coupling is weak enough to be treated by perturbation , it is easy to quantitatively check the validity of our understanding of the vibration . the unique role played by particles in high - j orbits is noticeable in almost all topics . some unique features of particles in high - j orbits are : approximately high - j wave - functions not only for the practical size of quadrupole deformation but also under an appreciable amount of rotation ; large coriolis coupling ; strong alignment immediately after rotation sets in ; unique contribution to octupole vibrations ; in case of full alignment of one high - j quasiparticle a given @xmath68 deformation is preferred as a function of shell - filling ; unique contributions to the shell - structure for prolate shape and for oblate shape , respectively ; and so on . though the idea of particle - vibration coupling itself can be applied to any kind of vibrations in nuclei , numerical applications have been so far done extensively in the isoscalar shape oscillations . when the vibration is the isoscalar quadrupole oscillation in spherical nuclei , the associated particle - vibration coupling is often so strong that it can not be treated by perturbation . in the present article the particle - vibration coupling , in which the vibration is a typical isoscalar octupole shape - oscillation , the lowest excited 3@xmath17 state of @xmath5pb@xmath6 , is chosen . in this case most data can be analyzed by the perturbation treatment of the coupling . thanks to the richness of available experimental data on the octupole - vibrations in neighboring nuclei of @xmath7pb , i believe we have confirmed that bohr and mottelson s basic idea of the shape oscillations and the associated particle - vibration coupling in nuclei is definitely on the right track . nuclear high - spin physics , in particular the yrast spectroscopy , was very actively and successfully developed during the last three decades of the 20th century , together with the tremendous progress in multi - gamma - ray detectors , 4@xmath191 or 8@xmath191 spectrometers and heavy - ion accelerators . at the beginning people were just fascinated by studying various kinds of rotational bands obtained from the analysis of observed discrete @xmath68-rays . the analysis of the data around the deformed ground - state was carried out based on nilsson diagrams , while at higher spins it was often done based on routhian diagrams . a clear evidence for mottelson - valatin effect @xcite , which was wondered once to be the origin of back - bending phenomena , was of course looked for . however , a clear - cut evidence for the phase transition might have been difficult to be seen in finite systems such as nuclei . after the discovery of the superdeformed ( 2:1 ) band in 1986 , hyperdeformed ( 3:1 ) bands were looked for , but the analysis of further complicated discrete and continuum @xmath68-rays has been so far unsuccessful in drawing any clear conclusion . experimental findings of quantized wobbling modes are the result of the technology developed in high - spin physics . the wobbling mode in @xmath64lu is the first one observed in nuclei , and it is even now the most beautiful and complete one . the presence of one aligned @xmath67 proton in the intrinsic configuration of @xmath64lu certainly helped the mode to appear around the yrast line so as to be found more easily . the electromagnetic properties of observed two close - lying @xmath91 rotational bands are being explored presently by several experimental groups . so far , whenever the electromagnetic transition probabilities were measured , they did not follow even the trivial selection - rule . however , if the close - lying @xmath91 bands are not interpreted as chiral pair - bands , one may wonder what they are . drip - line physics with halo phenomena is relatively newly - developed area in the study of nuclear structure , as a result of radioactive ion beam facilities constructed all over the world . it has given us the opportunity to learn the properties of fermion systems with very loosely bound particles . the heaviest odd - n halo nucleus so far known is @xmath139 mg , which is interpreted as the deformed p - wave halo . in heavier nuclei the ratio of the fraction of the particles , which lie in the extended region far outside the region of the main density of the system , to the total number of particles becomes smaller . nevertheless , the reactions such as coulomb break - up , which are extremely sensitive to the density far outside the region of the main density , may still easily detect the halo structure . then , besides the possible halo related to the @xmath192 level , the interesting region of possible one - neutron halo heavier than @xmath139 mg will be the neutron - drip - line nucleus with @xmath193 coming from the weakly - bound 3@xmath142 orbit if the shape is limited to be spherical . in contrast , if we look for the prolately deformed region as a result of near - degeneracy of the @xmath194 , @xmath195 and @xmath196 orbits in the spherical limit , a deformed @xmath197-wave halo may be expected for the lowest - lying @xmath198 orbit of the @xmath143=4 major shell , which will lie around the fermi level of neutron - drip - line nuclei with @xmath199 . the reason for the overwhelming dominance of prolate shape compared with oblate shape except for very light nuclei has not really pinned down . the clear difference of the splitting of one - particle levels coming from high - j orbits on the prolate side from on the oblate side may have something to do with the dominance . due to the unique shell - structure on the oblate side the particle numbers , at which the large energy gap occurs on the oblate side of the nilsson diagram of realistic potentials , can be reliably guessed from the magic numbers of the deformed oscillator potential . in this connection , it would be interesting to know whether the shape of @xmath190c@xmath173 is oblate or not . 99 a. bohr and b. r. mottelson , _ nuclear structure _ ( benjamin , reading , ma , 1975 ) , vol . i. hamamoto , physics reports * 10c * , no.2 , ( 1974 ) . a. r. barnett and w. r. phillips , phys . rev . * 186 * , 1205 ( 1969 ) . o.hausser , f. c. khanna and d. ward , nucl . phys . * a194 * , 113 ( 1972 ) . e. grosse _ et al . a174 * , 525 , ( 1971 ) . j. w. hertel , d. g. fleming , j. p. schiffer and h. e. gove , phys . * 23 * , 488 ( 1969 ) . i. hamamoto , phys . lett . * 66b * , 410 , ( 1977 ) . m. nagao , in : proc . of the intern . conf . on nuclear structure studies using electron scattering and photoreaction , k. shoda and h. ui ( sendai , 1972 ) p.121 . j. h. heisenberg and i. sick , phys . 32b * , 249 ( 1970 ) . m. piiparinen _ et al . _ , z. phys . * a309 * , 87 , ( 1982 ) . p. kleinheinz , _ et al . lett . * 48 * , 1457 , ( 1982 ) . s. g. nilsson , mat . * 29 * , no.16 , ( 1955 ) . s. a. moszkowski , phys . rev . * 99 * , 803 , ( 1955 ) . k. gottfried , phys . rev . * 103 * , 1017 , ( 1956 ) . a. johnson , h. ryde and j. sztarkier , phys . * b34 * , 605 , ( 1971 ) ; a. johnson , h. ryde and s. a. hjorth , nucl . phys . * a179 * , 753 ( 1972 ) . s. cohen , f. plasil and w. j. swiatecki , ann . * 82 * , 557 ( 1974 ) . a. bohr , nobel lecture , dec.11 , 1975 ( nobelstiftelsen 1976 ) . a. bohr and b. r. mottelson , phys . today , * 32 * , 25 ( 1979 ) . i. hamamoto , treatise on heavy - ion science , vol.3 , 313 , ( plenum publishing corporation , 1985 ) . j. d. garrett , g. b. hagemann and b. herskind , ann . rev sci . * 36 * , 419 ( 1986 ) . a. bohr and b. r. mottelson , phys . * 10a * , 13 ( 1974 ) . r. bengtsson , i. hamamoto and b. r. mottelson , phys . lett . * 73b * , 259 ( 1978 ) . r. bengtsson and s. frauendorf , nucl . phys . * a327 * , 139 ( 1979 ) . i. hamamoto , nuclear structure 1985 , p.129 , proc . of the niels bohr centennial conference , copenhagen , may , 1985 ( north - holland ) . i. hamamoto , nucl . phys . * a271 * , 15 , ( 1976 ) . p. twin _ et al . * 57 * , 811 ( 1986 ) . s. m. polikanov _ et al . _ , ( ussr ) * 42 * , 1464 ( 1962 ) ; transl . soviet phys . jetp * 15 * , 1016 ( 1962 ) . p. j. nolan and p. j. twin , ann . nucl . part . 38 * , 533 ( 1988 ) . r. v. f. janssens and t. l. khoo , ann . nucl . part . sci . * 41 * , 321 ( 1991 ) . some experimental data are collected in : k. heyde and j. l. wood , rev . phys . * 83 * , 1467 ( 2011 ) . for example , see : i.hamamoto , nucl . a520 * , 297c ( 1990 ) . s.w . degrd _ et al . _ , * 86 * , 5866 ( 2001 ) . d. r. jensen _ et al . lett . * 89 * , 142503 ( 2002 ) . i. hamamoto , phys . c * 65 * , 044305 ( 2002 ) . i. hamamoto and b. r. mottelson , phys . lett . * b127 * , 281 ( 1983 ) . g. andersson _ et al . _ , * a268 * , 205 ( 1976 ) . i. hamamoto , phys . b193 * , 399 ( 1987 ) . d. r. jensen _ et al . _ , nucl . phys . * a703 * , 3 ( 2002 ) . g. b. hagemann , private communications . schnack - petersen _ et al . _ , nucl . phys . * a594 * , 175 ( 1995 ) . s. frauendorf and j. meng , nucl . phys . * a617 * , 131 ( 1997 ) . k. starosta _ et al . _ , lett . * 86 * , 971 ( 2001 ) . t. koike , k. starosta and i. hamamoto , phys . * 93 * , 172502 ( 2004 ) . a. bohr and b. r. mottelson , _ nuclear structure _ ( benjamin , reading , ma , 1969 ) , vol . i. a. ozawa , t. kobayashi , t. suzuki , k. yoshida , and i. tanihata , phys . rev . * 84 * , 5493 ( 2000 ) . h. jahn and e. teller , proc . london , ser . * a161 * , 220 ( 1937 ) . i. hamamoto , phys . rev . * c76 * , 054319 ( 2007 ) . i. hamamoto , phys . rev . * c85 * , 064329 ( 2012 ) . r. g. newton , _ scattering theory of waves and particles _ ( mcgraw - hill , new york , 1966 ) . i. hamamoto , phys . rev . * c72 * , 024301 ( 2005 ) ; * c73 * , 064308 ( 2006 ) . p. doornenbal _ et al . _ , rev . lett . * 111 * , 212502 ( 2013 ) . t. nakamura _ et al . _ , lett . * 103 * , 262501 ( 2009 ) ; * 112 * , 142501 ( 2014 ) . n. kobayashi _ et al . _ , lett . * 112 * , 242501 ( 2014 ) . i. tanihata _ et al . _ , * 55 * , 2676 ( 1985 ) . p. fallon _ * c81 * , 041302 ( 2010 ) . i. hamamoto and b. r. mottelson , c. r. physique * 4 * , 433 ( 2003 ) . t. misu , w. nazarewicz and s. berg , nucl . * a614 * , 44 ( 1997 ) . i. hamamoto , phys . rev . * c69 * , 041306(r ) ( 2004 ) . s. takeuchi _ et al . _ , lett . * 109 * , 182501 ( 2012 ) . i. hamamoto , phys . rev . * c89 * , 057301 ( 2014 ) . i. hamamoto and b. r. mottelson , phys . rev . * c79 * , 034317 ( 2009 ) . b. r. mottelson and j. g. valatin , phys . * 5 * , 511 ( 1960 ) . Abstract:
[ "some developments of nuclear - structure physics uniquely related to copenhagen school are sketched based on theoretical considerations versus experimental findings and one - particle versus collective aspects . based on my personal overview i pick up the following topics ; ( 1 ) study of vibration in terms of particle - vibration coupling ; ( 2 ) one - particle motion in deformed and rotating potentials , and yrast spectroscopy in high - spin physics ; ( 3 ) triaxial shape in nuclei : wobbling motion and chiral bands ; ( 4 ) nuclear structure of drip line nuclei : in particular , shell - structure ( or magic numbers ) change and spherical or deformed halo phenomena ; ( 5 ) shell structure in oblate deformation ." ]
12,950
12,950
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: iin this paper , we consider a uniform , infinite universe with a spherical hole . ultimately , we intend to develop a new cosmological model for an expanding universe in which holes are the dominant feature . geller and huchra @xcite also indicate the importance of holes in the universe by writing ... it probably makes more physical sense to regard the individual voids as the fundamental structures . " thus motivated , we consider the behavior of a hole in an otherwise infinite and uniform universe . we show first in section 2 , using newtonian theory , that there exists an outward - directed gravitational force acting away from the center of the spherical hole , and we develop a formula for this force . this force is referred to as negative gravity . then , in section 3 , we solve the newtonian differential equations to discover the expansionary behavior of the hole and develop certain formul to be used later . we show the same conclusion using the methods of einstein s general relativity in section 4 . the derivation of the standard schwarzschild solution for an attracting point particle of mass @xmath0 is well known . the results are summarized in section 4.1 , and several consequences are mentioned which will be important later when the techniques used in the solution of the schwarzschild problem are applied to a nonstatic distribution of mass . it is well known that particles and photons are attracted toward the mass . in the geodesic equations describing the motion of particles and photons , if the mass were negative , we would conclude that particles and photons would deflect away from the mass . although negative mass may not have any physical significance , it serves as an introduction to the main results of later sections . the concept of negative mass will be used in terms of superimposing on a uniform universe this schwarzschild solution for negative mass in order to simulate a mass deficiency ( hole ) in an otherwise uniform universe . section 4.2 gives a new interpretation of the solution of einstein s field equations for a uniform distribution of mass . this solution represents a flat geometry and reduces to the flat geometry of special relativity for mass density decreasing to zero . section 4.3 describes the effect of a spherical hole in a uniform universe . in these sections also , the physical significance of the cosmological constant is determined . if this were a linear universe , the two solutions from sections 4.2 and 4.3 could be superimposed . in a physically imaginable universe which is initially uniformly filled with mass except for a spherical hole , particles and photons are deflected away from the hole . this follows since the geometry of the uniform distribution is flat and does not affect the uniform motion of particles and photons , while the negative schwarzschild mass of section 4.2 would repel matter and photons . loosely speaking , the hole repels matter and energy . also in section 4.3 , a remarkably close connection is made between the schwarzschild solution and the newly discovered newtonian potential for holes , which includes the contribution of negative gravity . the purpose of section 4.4 is to show this using the fully nonlinear einstein field equations . finally , the geodesic equations are considered , and it is shown that particles and photons are deflected away from the hole . section 4.5 summarizes the results . section 5 gives a development of a new cosmology , based upon expanding holes in an infinite , uniform universe . this is based upon a paper by r. n. lewis @xcite , in which it is shown how structure could form from the interactions of nearby holes , resulting in the universe we observe today . the microwave background radiation , caused by gravitational redshift , and hubble s law are shown to be natural consequences of the model . we also discuss the relative abundances of elements throughout the universe , olbers paradox , and other observed phenomena . finally , in section 6 , we use some of the ideas and equations previously derived in order to calculate hubble s constant , the average mass density in the universe , and the cosmological constant . certain accurate astronomical data are used in the calculations . the value derived for hubble s constant is shown to lie within the experimentally - determined range for that constant , providing confidence that the underlying theory is correct . iin this section , we consider a newtonian approach to the gravitational force field in an infinite universe filled with a uniform distribution of mass with the exception of a spherical hole . physicists usually consider the potential and the force acting on a particle anywhere in such an infinite universe to be infinite , since a formal integration over space produces this result . however , we apply symmetry in our calculations to produce cancellations , which leads to a finite force at any point . this application of symmetry is mathematically equivalent to a cauchy - type integration , without which the integral would be infinite . whether this approach is valid depends on its agreement with the results of general relativity . using results in later sections of this paper , we show this to be the case . iwe consider an infinite , uniform distribution of matter with mass from a spherical region removed and evaluate the force field at any point . the three main hypotheses we use are : 1 . gravity obeys the ( newtonian ) inverse - square force law , and it acts over arbitrarily large distances and time intervals . the general relativistic aspects of this problem are taken up later in this paper . when necessary , matter will be considered to be distributed continuously rather than discretely throughout space . with this assumption , the calculations become tractable . on the other hand , the difference in effect on a point mass of a continuous distribution of matter versus a discretely distributed ( atomic ) set of matter is negligible . indeed , the only essential aspect of the distribution of matter which is used in the computations leading to the results in section 2.3 is spherical symmetry . also , when convenient , we will assume that the mass density is constant . the universe is spatially infinite . this , along with the constant mass density of hypothesis ( 2 ) , implies that the universe contains an infinite amount of mass . ihere , we present some results which depend only upon the inverse - square law of newtonian theory . see kittel , knight , and rudderman @xcite for appropriate computations involving gravitational forces . the following is a list of the necessary facts and formul : 1 . the gravitational force due to a spherical shell of mass of radius @xmath1 , ( infinitesimal ) thickness @xmath2 , and mass density @xmath3 ( mass per unit volume ) acting on a mass @xmath0 outside the shell ( @xmath4 ) is the same as if all of the mass of the shell were concentrated at the center of the sphere . mathematically , this is expressed as + @xmath5 + where @xmath6 is newton s gravitational constant ( @xmath7 x @xmath8 m@xmath9/kg s@xmath10 ) , @xmath11 is the distance from the center of the sphere to the mass , and @xmath12 is a unit vector from the center of the sphere toward the mass . in the case @xmath13 , a slight modification of the calculations leading to the above result yields @xmath14 2 . if we have the same situation as in ( 1 ) above , but the mass @xmath0 is inside the shell ( @xmath15 ) , then there is no gravitational force acting on the mass . therefore + @xmath16 + this result generalizes to the case of a spherical shell ( not infinitesimally thin ) of inner radius @xmath17 and outer radius @xmath18 . the gravitational force acting on @xmath0 inside @xmath17 is still @xmath19 . furthermore , the above results generalize by integration to a sphere of mass acting on a mass @xmath0 . the force due to a sphere of mass of radius @xmath1 and mass density @xmath3 acting on a mass @xmath0 outside the sphere ( @xmath20 ) is the same as if all the mass were concentrated at the center . thus + @xmath21{{gm}\o{r^2}}\v{e}.\ ] ] 4 . if we have the same situation as in ( 3 ) but the mass @xmath0 is inside the sphere ( @xmath15 ) , then all of the mass outside of @xmath11 contributes nothing to the force , and the mass inside of @xmath11 acts on @xmath0 as if it were concentrated at the center . therefore + @xmath22{{gm}\o{r^2}}\v{e } = -\left({4\o 3}\right)\pi r\rho gm\v{e}.\ ] ] finally , we mention that , for a finite , spherically symmetric ( not necessarily uniform ) mass distribution , the gravitational force of it on a point mass does not depend on the mass farther away from the center than the point mass , and is the same as if all of the mass closer to the center than the point mass were concentrated at the center . we will see in the next section how this result generalizes to infinite mass distributions , with unexpected results . ithe next question we ask is : what is the gravitational force on a point mass @xmath0 situated at a positive distance @xmath11 from the origin due to a uniformly distributed ( infinite ) mass external to a spherical hole with center at the origin and radius @xmath1 ( @xmath15 ) ? that is , what is the gravitational effect on a test particle in a spherical hole in an otherwise uniform universe ? if we consider the situation specified in the generalization of formula ( 2 ) in section 2.2 , and navely let @xmath23 , then we would conclude that the total force acting on @xmath0 is @xmath19 . however , this conclusion is not accurate , since the total mass which lies outside the sphere of radius @xmath18 is not spherically symmetric about @xmath0 ( although it is spherically symmetric about the center of the sphere ) , and does have an effect on @xmath0 . in order to analyze this case , consider the situation depicted in figure 1 . we take the origin of our coordinate system at @xmath0 , with the center of the sphere @xmath24 , of radius @xmath1 , at a point @xmath11 units to the right of @xmath0 . then we draw a sphere , @xmath25 , with center at @xmath0 and radius @xmath26 . we also add a sphere , @xmath27 , concentric with @xmath24 , and with radius @xmath11 . since the mass external to @xmath25 is spherically symmetric with respect to @xmath0 , its total gravitational force on @xmath0 is @xmath19 . thus , the only effective force which will act on @xmath0 will be that due to the mass in the three - dimensional crescent - shaped region ( crescentoid ) , @xmath28 , which lies inside @xmath25 and outside @xmath24 ( see fig . 1 ) . in order to handle this situation , consider a totally uniform distribution of matter ( no hole ) with a test mass @xmath0 at the origin . by symmetry , there will be no force acting on @xmath0 . also by symmetry , the net force on @xmath0 due to all mass inside @xmath25 is @xmath19 . the force on @xmath0 due to all the mass in the spherical shell between @xmath27 and @xmath24 is @xmath19 , from the results of formula ( 2 ) and its generalization in section 2.2 . therefore , the mass in the region @xmath28 will have a force on @xmath0 which will exactly counterbalance the force on @xmath0 due to the mass inside @xmath27 . from section 2.2 , formula ( 4 ) , we find the force on @xmath0 due to the mass inside @xmath27 to be @xmath29 , where @xmath12 is a unit vector from the center of @xmath27 toward @xmath0 . thus , the force on @xmath0 due to the mass in the shaded region ( crescentoid ) is @xmath30 this will also be equal to the force acting on @xmath0 in a uniform universe with a hole ( either @xmath27 or @xmath24 ) , since the counterbalancing mass inside @xmath27 is not present . we note the interesting result that this force does not depend on @xmath1 . because of this , in some applications , we can think of @xmath1 as being arbitrarily large , and the crescentoid region in the figure as being arbitrarily far away from @xmath0 . the matter ( or absence of it ) in the spherical shell between @xmath27 and @xmath24 provides no contribution to the force on @xmath0 . we can therefore say that the force @xmath31 on @xmath0 given by the above formula is due to mass arbitrarily far away from @xmath0 . we also note that , as time passes , matter moves outward from the hole , destroying the constancy of matter but preserving spherical symmetry about the center of the hole . the above comments hold in this case as well , since the crescentoid region referred to above can be considered to be arbitrarily far from the motion and unaffected by it . the formula for force given above still applies , with @xmath11 a function of time . at this point , we mention that a formal mathematical integration over all space , after applying symmetry considerations , yields the same result . we note that the force can be written as @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the mass deficiency of the hole ( out to @xmath11 ) . this shows that newton s inverse - square force law holds for negative masses ( holes ) acting on positive masses . this formula gives the force @xmath31 at any point inside the hole ( @xmath15 ) . however , spherical shells of matter of any radius greater than @xmath11 have no gravitational effect on a mass @xmath0 at @xmath11 , so we can think of @xmath1 as being arbitrarily large . thus , the above formula yields the outward force at any point inside r outside the hole . for a point outside ( @xmath20 ) the hole , however , there will be an additional inward - directed force due to all mass closer to the origin than @xmath11 . this inward force is @xmath34gm}\o{r^2}}\v{e}. \eqno ( 2)\ ] ] the sum of the above two forces yields the force due to a hole of radius @xmath1 in an otherwise infinite and uniform distribution of mass on a mass @xmath0 at distance @xmath11 ( @xmath35 ) from the origin ( that is , the force of a hole acting on a mass outside the hole ) . this force is @xmath36 where @xmath37 is the mass deficiency of the hole . this again shows the applicability of newton s inverse - square force law with one negative and one positive mass . it is tempting to say that newton s inverse - square force law holds for two negative masses as well . however , we would need to define what we mean by a force on a hole . we simply mention that two holes would have an effect on each other due to the above - mentioned force acting on the particles surrounding the holes . the net effect would be that the two holes would move toward each other and become slightly distorted . we conclude that positive masses attract each other , as do negative masses ( holes ) , but positive and negative masses repel each other . the implication of the above result is the following . the infinite amount of matter outside of a hole in an otherwise infinite and uniform distribution of matter will gravitationally draw matter out of the hole . we can loosely say that the hole repels matter , just as a concentration of matter would attract matter ( section 2.2 ) . we refer to this phenomenon as _ negative gravity_. it must be remembered that this term refers to the apparent repulsion of matter by holes . in fact , the actual mechanism causing negative gravity is the positive gravitational attraction of mass at infinity " , that is , the mass in a crescentoid region arbitrarily far from the hole . the term negative gravity should not be taken to imply that the gravitational force between two particles is repulsive ; gravity is always attractive . as we shall see in section 4 , however , the energy - momentum tensor in the neighborhood of a hole can be negative because of the above - described effect . ian obvious generalization to make to the above calculations is the following . in a spherically symmetric ( about the origin ) universe , the net force acting on a particle of mass @xmath0 at a distance @xmath11 from the origin is @xmath38 where @xmath39 , is the difference in the average densities of matter outside and inside @xmath11 , respectively . the density @xmath40 is the mass divided by the volume of the region inside @xmath11 . the density @xmath41 is the average mass density over the region external to the sphere of radius @xmath11 . we note that if @xmath42 , then this formula reduces to the formula in section 2.3 . if @xmath43 , ( i.e. if there is negligible mass outside a sphere of large radius , or if the mass density decreases to 0 as @xmath11 increases ) , then the net force is inward , the force being given by formula ( 3 ) in section 2.2 . thus , the basic underlying idea for negative gravity to exist is that @xmath44 . furthermore , if @xmath44 , we speculate that , even in the absence of total spherical symmetry , there will be a net outward force ( from centers of holes ) tending to pull things apart . inow let us investigate the behavior of a spherical hole in an otherwise infinite and uniform universe and form some conclusions about the rate of expansion . as we point out later , a slow expansion caused by negative gravity does occur . we model the problem mathematically and solve two specific problems ( sections 3.1 and 3.2 ) which assume that the age of the universe under consideration is infinite . the conclusions show the relatively large time intervals that are required for particles to move an appreciable distance . under the assumptions given above , the outwardly - directed negative gravitational force acts at each point of space . for a particle of mass @xmath0 , the force was given above by equation ( 1 ) . this formula holds no matter what @xmath11 is . in other words , it holds both inside ( @xmath15 ) and outside ( @xmath20 ) the hole , although when the point is outside the hole , there is also an inward - directed force @xmath45 [ equ . ( 2 ) ] due to all mass inside @xmath11 . in fact , this formula holds even in a nonuniform universe as long as the universe is spherically symmetric about the origin and @xmath3 represents the average mass density . ilet us suppose that we have a universe of discrete hydrogen atoms . such a universe can not be uniform ( continuous ) except in a statistical sense , but it can be spherically symmetric about the origin . let us suppose that this is the case and that an atom , @xmath46 , lies at the origin . we also assume that the average mass density , @xmath3 , is one atom per cubic meter ( @xmath47 x @xmath48 kg / m@xmath9 ) . this is roughly on the same order of the value that current observations of luminous matter lead us to believe . the presence of unobserved matter would increase this value . the actual value of @xmath3 is immaterial to the conclusion we wish to draw . because of the density assumption , we assume that the nearest other atoms are one meter ( 1 m ) from the origin . to @xmath46 , the other atoms appear to be distributed spherically - symmetrically over all space outside of a hole of radius one meter . now , let @xmath46 be displaced a distance @xmath49 m in any direction . let @xmath50 represent this configuration , with @xmath51 representing the original spherically - symmetric universe . the hypotheses ( a test particle in a hole in a spherically - symmetric universe ) of section 1 are satisfied . the outward force given in that section acts on the atom @xmath46 . newton s second law of motion implies that @xmath52 where @xmath53 is a position vector of the particle . the initial value problem for @xmath11 , therefore , is @xmath54 @xmath55 @xmath56 let @xmath57^{1/2 } = 6.84 $ ] x @xmath58 s@xmath59 . then the solution of the initial value problem is @xmath60 according to this differential equation model , the time , @xmath61 , it takes for the mass @xmath0 ( hydrogen atom ) to reach the edge of the hole ( @xmath62 m ) and its corresponding velocity depend on @xmath63 . for example , if @xmath64 m , @xmath65 x @xmath66 years . if @xmath67 m , @xmath68 x @xmath66 years . in both cases , since @xmath69 , and since @xmath62 m , then @xmath70 x @xmath58 m / s . note that @xmath71/\a \}\bigl)/\beta \approx [ ln(2/\a ) ] /\beta \r \infty$ ] as @xmath72 . the conclusion we arrive at is that it takes infinitely long to transform the universe from configuration @xmath51 to configuration @xmath73 for @xmath74 m. there are two aspects of this model that need clarification . the first is that , as the hydrogen atom @xmath46 moves , it also gravitationally affects all the other atoms in the universe , displacing them slightly and destroying the spherical symmetry of the universe outside the hole . to counter this problem , we argue that the conclusion we reached at the end of the previous paragraph is still valid . the reason to believe this is that the smaller the value of @xmath63 is , the better the initial value problem @xmath75 models the physical situation . in the next section , we present a model in which spherical symmetry is preserved , so that this problem does not arise . the other remark to make is a positive one . this model allows us to start with a uniform universe , @xmath51 , at time @xmath76 ( let @xmath72 ) instead of starting at a particular time , @xmath77 ( big bang " ) , with a particular mass density and having to worry about what happened before that time or about what caused things to happen . inow let us consider a uniform ( rather than a discrete ) distribution of mass [ @xmath78 x @xmath48 kg / m@xmath9 ] and suppose that , at time @xmath80 , a spherical hole of radius @xmath1 is introduced , centered at the origin @xmath81 . @xmath82note : @xmath83^{1/3}$ ] m if we consider the problem of taking away the equivalent mass of one atom at the origin.@xmath84 consider the force acting at point @xmath85 where @xmath86 . at time @xmath87 , we have the situation depicted in figure 2 . there is an outward force ( relative to @xmath81 ) acting on each particle ( see below ) , so at a later time we will have the situation depicted in figure 3 . at time @xmath87 , the force acting on a particle at a distance @xmath88 from @xmath81 is @xmath89 where [ equ . ( 1 ) ] @xmath90 is the outward force due to negative gravity of all mass outside @xmath88 , and [ equ . ( 2 ) ] @xmath91\rho gm}\o{r_1 ^ 2}}\v{e}\ ] ] is the inward force due to mass inside @xmath88 , where @xmath92\rho$ ] is the mass inside the sphere of radius @xmath93 centered at @xmath81 . at time @xmath87 , @xmath94 which is outward - directed . the magnitude of @xmath95 decreases with increasing distance ( @xmath93 ) from @xmath81 . at time @xmath96 , the force acting on a particle at distance @xmath11 from @xmath81 is @xmath89 where @xmath97 is the force due to negative gravity ( it changes with @xmath11 ) , and @xmath45 is the inward force due to positive gravity of all matter closer to the origin than @xmath11 . because of the initial outward - directed force , all particles will be accelerated outward . we will see later that this outward motion will continue forever . at this point , let us make a further assumption about the motion . we will assume that atoms do not pass each other on their outward journey as time progresses . to justify this assumption , consider what would happen if one particle were to pass another . the force @xmath98 on each would not change , but the inward - directed force @xmath45 would . the magnitude of @xmath45 on the overtakng particle would increase , due to the increased mass inside the sphere of radius @xmath11 , thus decreasing the magnitude of the outward force @xmath31 . the magnitude of the force @xmath45 on the overtakn particle would similarly decrease . the net effect of one particle passing another would be a decrease in acceleration on the passing particle and an increase in acceleration on the passed particle . other particles farther away would see no effect of this passing , so we just assume it does not occur . with this assumption , we can write @xmath99\rho gm}\o{r^2}}\v{e}.\ ] ] because of the above assumption , the total amount of matter closer to @xmath81 than @xmath11 remains unchanged ( the term in brackets in the numerator ) , but @xmath45 has changed since @xmath11 in the denominator has increased from its initial value @xmath93 . therefore @xmath100 this is always an outward - directed force since the last parenthesized term is always positive . at time @xmath87 , it equals @xmath101 since @xmath88 . when @xmath102 , then @xmath103 , so the term in parentheses is greater than @xmath104 . since position is given by @xmath53 , then newton s second law gives @xmath105 or , with @xmath106 , @xmath107 but @xmath108 , so @xmath109 therefore @xmath110 the solution satisfying @xmath111 and @xmath88 at @xmath87 is @xmath112\right\ } ^{1/2},\ ] ] or @xmath113 this is difficult to integrate except when @xmath114 ( a point at the edge of the hole ) . in that case , @xmath115 the solution satisfying @xmath116 , found by trigonometric substitution in the integral of the above expression or by direct solution of the second order differential equation [ with @xmath117 , is @xmath118 @xmath119 note that , for @xmath120 ( the same formula was derived in section 3.1 for a discrete distribution of matter ) , which shows that hubble s law holds in this ( accelerating ) expanding universe , with no need for introducing a singularity ( big bang " ) at some finite time in the past . in addition , the value of @xmath121 given here as the proportionality constant is surprisingly close to the estimated value of the hubble constant @xmath122 . i propose that this value for @xmath121 is the one that should be used for the hubble constant , not necessarily the numerical value which is dependent upon a more accurate estimate of the average density in the universe , but the formula given before equation ( 4 ) . see section 6 for a more accurate calculation of @xmath3 and hence of @xmath121 . now we consider equation ( 5 ) when @xmath123 . in equation ( 5 ) , we let @xmath124 and @xmath125 and integrate , using @xmath126 , to obtain @xmath127^{1/2}}}ds.\ ] ] this can be written in terms of elliptic integrals of the first and third kinds ( see @xcite ) . we will not pursue this integral solution further since we are able to derive the desired results directly from the differential equation . now we consider the velocity of the particles . we have already shown that the magnitude of @xmath95 ( and therefore of acceleration ) is a decreasing function of initial position . thus , for a certain time interval after @xmath87 , the speed of particles will be a decreasing function of position also . we will assume that this situation holds for all @xmath128 . since particles that start farther out always move slower , the particles which began closer to the origin will begin to catch up to , but never overtake , the more distant particles . thus , an outward moving spherical wave of matter starts to build up at the edge of the hole . now let us find out how long the above process takes . using values for the constants given above , the time @xmath61 required for the spherical wave of matter to reach one light year in radius is given by @xmath129 if @xmath93 is the radius of a hole which holds the mass of one atom , then @xmath130 and @xmath131 it will take @xmath132 trillion years to evacuate a hole of radius @xmath133 light year . at that time , the velocity of the outwardly expanding wave would be @xmath134 x @xmath135 m / s . further calculations show that the mass of a typical galaxy ( our own , for instance ) is about @xmath136 x @xmath137 kg / sun x @xmath66 suns / galaxy @xmath138 x @xmath139 kg . in the original one - atom - per - cubic - meter universe , a sphere would need to have a radius of @xmath140 x @xmath141 m @xmath142 x @xmath143 light years to contain that much mass . solving @xmath144 for @xmath61 shows that it would take @xmath145 in order to evacuate a hole of size large enough to have initially contained the mass of a typical galaxy . the velocity of the outward - expanding wave at that time would be @xmath146 x @xmath147 m / s , still less than @xmath148 of the speed of light . in analogy with section 3.1 , we remark that the equation @xmath149 can be solved for @xmath61 as a function of @xmath11 and @xmath93 . for a given value of @xmath11 , we see that @xmath150 as @xmath151 . this reconfirms the conclusion we made in section 3.1 of the infinite age of the universe we are considering here . later , we show how this model can be applied to develop a cosmological model for our universe . inow we turn to an investigation of the problem of the behavior of a spherical hole in an infinite , uniform universe from the point of view of general relativity . we will have occasion to use some of the previously - derived results and will show that the newtonian results are compatible with general relativity . ithe standard line element of riemannian geometry is given as @xmath152 , where the einstein summation convention is used , and @xmath63 and @xmath153 take on values 1 through 4 . the @xmath154 are the elements of the metric tensor . because the problem we are considering exhibits spherical symmetry , the coordinates @xmath155 will be identified with the standard spherical coordinates of special relativity : @xmath156 where @xmath157 is the speed of light in a vacuum . depending on context , the origin will be taken to be either the center of an attracting mass or , when dealing with a hole in a uniform universe , the center of the hole . a standard solution of einstein s equations , which is now well known , was first found by schwarzschild in 1916 . for a particle of mass @xmath0 in an otherwise empty space , the static line element can be reduced to @xcite @xmath158 where @xmath159 and @xmath160 are functions of @xmath11 only . the relativistic field equations are ( * ? ? ? ( 9.79 ) ) @xmath161 @xmath162 is the contracted riemann - christoffel tensor , @xmath28 is a scalar contracted from @xmath162 , @xmath163 is the energy - momentum tensor , @xmath164 is the cosmological constant introduced by einstein , and @xmath165 is a constant which is related to the constant of gravitation in newton s theory . @xmath165 is usually evaluated when poisson s equation for the potential is used as a first approximation . this is not done here for two reasons : ( 1 ) a different potential [ that for holes ; see equ . ( 8b ) ] is used , and ( 2 ) the value of @xmath165 is later derived independently . later , the gravitational force acting on a particle of mass @xmath0 in a uniform universe with a spherical hole whose center is at the origin will be considered . the results of the newtonian theory are presented here for purposes of comparison with the results of general relativity . earlier , we found the outward newtonian force at any point to be [ see equs . ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) ] @xmath166 this represents a conservative force field with corresponding potential @xmath167 while this may not be the standard way of defining @xmath168 , the ultimate use to which this is put is as a guide to solve the field equations . the conclusion of that venture in no way depends upon this newtonian potential . moreover , the similarity below between this newtonian potential for holes and the schwarzschild solution is certainly more than coincidental . from equation ( 8b ) , we finally note that , either inside or outside the hole , direct differentiation yields @xmath169 this is the negative of the value found for the potential of an attracting mass ( * ? ? ? * equ . ( 9.3 ) ) . now consider an isolated mass at the origin . the equations ( 7 ) become @xcite @xmath170 @xmath171 + \l , \eqno ( 9b)\ ] ] @xmath172 where @xmath173 are the only possible nonzero elements of the energy - momentum tensor . only perfect fluids of density @xmath174 and pressure @xmath175 will be considered , so that the energy - momentum tensor reduces to @xmath176 as will be shown later , the cosmological constant , @xmath164 , enters into the equations through the influence of distant matter . in the schwarzschild model , special relativity boundary conditions at infinity are usually applied to obtain the value zero for @xmath164 . a nonzero value for @xmath164 is included in these calculations only for consideration in later models where distant matter can not be ignored . in the empty space surrounding the mass , the pressure and density are zero , and so @xmath177 . at this point , standard calculations on equations ( 9 ) yield the solution for the metric @xmath178 where @xmath0 is the mass of the attracting object . thus , the schwarzschild line element ( 6 ) becomes @xmath179 following tolman ( * ? ? ? * sec 83 ) , we can write the geodesic equations for a moving particle as @xmath180 where the term in braces is the christoffel symbol of the second kind . again , standard calculations yield the geodesics for a particle or for a photon . for a particle , we find that ( @xmath181 is a constant , @xmath182 ) @xmath183 or , for a radially - traveling particle , @xmath184 the acceleration in ( 14b ) is negative for positive @xmath0 and @xmath185 . thus , a particle is accelerated inward for an attracting body . for a photon , we can also calculate the geodesics . standard asymptotic analysis shows that the photon is deflected as it passes the attracting mass . to first order in @xmath186 , where @xmath28 is the distance of closest approach to the origin , the angle @xmath187 satisfies @xmath188 for an incoming photon , and @xmath189 for an outgoing photon . the photon has been deflected from the straight line path a total of @xmath190 toward the source @xmath0 , which agrees well with observations made during solar eclipses . the conclusion to be drawn from equations ( 14b ) and ( 15c ) is that , for negative @xmath0 and @xmath191 , particles are accelerated away from the mass ( @xmath192 , see @xcite ) , and photons are deflected away from the mass ( @xmath193 ) . particles and photons are deflected away from the origin due to an outward directed newtonian force or due to an outward - curving geometry . in other words , mass deficiency repels matter and energy . iconsider a spatially infinite universe with matter uniformly distributed with density @xmath194 . by spherical symmetry and homogeneity , the line element has the form [ equ . ( 6 ) ] @xmath195 where @xmath159 and @xmath160 are constants independent of @xmath11 and @xmath61 . einstein s field equations for a perfect fluid at constant pressure @xmath196 and constant density @xmath194 reduce to [ see equs.(9 ) and ( 10 ) ] @xmath197 @xmath198 @xmath199 so that ( see ( * ? ? ? after ( 4.206 ) ) ) @xmath200 @xmath201 @xmath202 @xmath203 equation ( 18c ) shows that the cosmological constant @xmath164 is nonzero . this shows the importance of the boundary conditions at infinity . a zero value for the cosmological constant is derived using special relativity ( no mass ) boundary conditions at infinity . a nonzero value is found by assuming uniformly distributed mass at infinity . @xmath164 must be positive in order that @xmath194 be positive . the pressure @xmath204 will then be negative . this is extremely counterintuitive . however , as we pointed out earlier , the introduction of a hole into an infinite , homogeneous , newtonian universe causes matter to move away from the hole . this explains the negative value of the pressure , since pressure measures the tendency of matter to fill a hole . this concept represents a significant change in cosmological thought . an infinite , uniform , static universe is now allowed , along with negative pressure , although such a universe is unstable ( see secs . 4.4 and 5 ) . see @xcite , for example , for a contrasting view . hawking @xcite states the contrasting case even more strongly : we now know that the universal attractive nature of gravity is inconsistent with a static infinite universe . " all three of @xmath204 , @xmath194 , and @xmath164 are extremely small in magnitude . later , the value of @xmath205 is found . using the values @xmath206 x @xmath8 m@xmath207 kg s@xmath208 x @xmath48 kg / m@xmath9 , and @xmath209 x @xmath210 m / s , then @xmath211 x @xmath212 m@xmath213 . the value of density is an estimate based upon observations of luminous matter and should provide a lower bound for @xmath164 . the presence of even vast amounts of unobserved matter would increase its value but not change the conclusions drawn . see section 6 for a more accurate determination of @xmath164 . in order to determine @xmath160 from ( 16 ) , consider a radially - traveling photon ( @xmath214 ) such that @xmath215 represents the speed of light in a medium of density @xmath194 , and @xmath216 is the index of refraction . @xmath217 is a reduction factor for the speed of light traveling through the medium , and @xmath218 . for a fixed medium , this will be constant . thus the speed of light in the medium is @xmath219 . as @xmath194 decreases to zero , @xmath217 increases to one . for the low density problem we envision here , @xmath220 . therefore , we will assume @xmath221 and not concern ourselves with the difference . it should also be recognized from the above equations that the cosmological constant @xmath164 is proportional to the density . this interpretation will provide a justification for the appearance of that constant in the field equations for cosmological purposes . it also gives a cosmological meaning to that constant and will show the effect of distant matter on the behavior of particles . finally , in a sparse universe of discrete atoms , there will be no kinetic interactions between atoms , and it is permissible to take @xmath222 , with @xmath223 . inow consider the same homogeneous universe with a spherical hole of radius @xmath1 . take the origin at the center of the hole . the line element will now have the form @xcite @xmath224 where @xmath159 and @xmath160 are functions of @xmath11 and @xmath61 . the universe is no longer static , but it can still be considered to be spherically symmetric . physically , think of arriving at this state by superimposing on a homogeneous universe a negative mass @xmath0 spread out over a sphere of radius @xmath1 , or , equivalently , deleting a sphere of radius @xmath1 and mass @xmath0 from the uniform universe . mathematically , think of linearizing the field equations and superimposing the schwarzschild exterior solution with negative mass , @xmath225 , onto the flat geometry of a uniform universe given in section 4.2 , @xmath226 . the field equations are ( see @xcite ; compare with equ . ( 9 ) ; note that dots and primes represent partial derivatives with respect to @xmath61 and @xmath11 , respectively ) @xmath227 = e^{-\l}\left({{\l ' } \o r } - { 1\o{r^2}}\right ) + { 1\o{r^2 } } - \l , \eqno ( 21a)\ ] ] @xmath228 = -e^{-\l}\left({{\nu ' } \o r } + { 1\o{r^2}}\right ) + { 1\o{r^2 } } - \l , \eqno ( 21b)\ ] ] @xmath229 = c\left[\left(\rho + { p\o{c^2}}\right)r^2sin^2\t \left({{d\phi}\o{ds}}\right)^2 + { p\o{c^2}}\right ] = \ ] ] @xmath230 + { { e^{-\nu}}\o{c^2}}\left({{\ddot{\l}}\o 2 } + { { \dot{\l}^2}\o 4 } - { { \dot{\l } \dot{\nu}}\o 4}\right ) - \l , \eqno ( 21c)\ ] ] @xmath231 = e^{-\l}{{\dot{\l}}\o { rc } } , \eqno ( 21d)\ ] ] where @xmath3 and @xmath175 represent density and pressure . these equations can be solved exactly in the interior of the hole where the energy - momentum tensor is zero . equations ( 21a ) and ( 21b ) imply @xmath232 . choose @xmath233 . also , equation ( 21d ) implies @xmath234 . theorem @xcite then requires @xmath235 since the equations ( 21 ) reduce to the same form as equations ( 9 ) [ see equ . ( 11 ) ] . regularity at @xmath236 requires @xmath237 . therefore , @xmath238 in light of equation ( 15c ) , with @xmath237 , the @xmath164 term has no influence on photons which pass through the hole in a straight euclidean line . however , with @xmath237 and @xmath239 , equation ( 14b ) implies that particles are accelerated outward . by continuity , this outward acceleration must extend at least part way into the matter - filled region outside the hole . we wonder whether the singularity at @xmath240 in equation ( 22b ) provides an upper limit to the expansion of holes in a uniform universe . in the newtonian theory , inside the hole , we have [ equs . ( 8) ] @xmath241 , and @xmath242 , indicating that @xmath243 , and @xmath244 . this is @xmath245 times the value usually used for c , which is derived for the potential of an attracting point mass . the equation @xmath246 is derived in @xcite or @xcite for a time independent metric , which exists in the interior of the hole . see @xcite where it is suggested how to calculate @xmath164 experimentally , thus yielding a reliable value for @xmath194 . before trying to solve the field equations ( 21 ) outside of the hole , where matter is in motion and the metric is not static , let us make a connection between this and the newtonian theory . there is the approximation given above @xmath247 where @xmath187 is the newtonian potential . we assume that this is approximately valid in the region exterior to the hole even though the metric is not static there . the force acting on a particle of mass @xmath0 at any point outside the hole is [ see equ . ( 4a ) ] @xmath248 . \eqno ( 24a)\ ] ] since the bracketed term is positive ( @xmath249 ) , the force is outward - directed . thus , as time increases , the hole expands outward and individual particles move away from the origin . the corresponding potential is @xmath250 . \eqno ( 24b)\ ] ] note that @xmath187 decreases toward @xmath251 as @xmath11 increases ( @xmath252 points in the same direction as @xmath253 ) , so that large @xmath11 values correspond to large negative potentials . using this value for @xmath187 , we see that @xmath254 from equation ( 23 ) should be of the form @xmath255}\o{c^2 } } \eqno ( 25a)\ ] ] @xmath256\left({g\o{c^2r}}\right ) - 2\left[\left({4\o 3}\right)\pi \rho _ 0r_1 ^ 3\right]\left({g\o{c^2r}}\right ) . \eqno ( 25b)\ ] ] earlier , we showed that , for a particle which started at @xmath114 , the position in the newtonian theory at any later time @xmath61 is @xmath257 . in addition , if @xmath123 then @xmath258 , but @xmath259 as @xmath260 . it is reasonable to conclude that @xmath261 where @xmath262 , so that the last term in equation ( 25b ) can be replaced with a general function @xmath263 which would be expected to lie asymptotically between @xmath264 and @xmath265 as @xmath266 . we identify in the first coefficient of @xmath264 in equation ( 25b ) the term @xmath267 which is the mass @xmath268 which was initially removed from an infinite homogeneous universe of constant density @xmath194 to make a hole of radius @xmath1 centered at the origin . letting @xmath269 ( * ? ? ? ( 8.28 ) , ( 8.33 ) ) or ( * ? ? ? ( 5.118 ) ) , this term is exactly @xmath270 which corresponds to the term in the schwarzschild exterior solution with negative mass [ see equ . ( 11 ) ] . the coefficient of @xmath271 is exactly the @xmath164 value calculated above . thus , @xmath272 which differs from the schwarzschild solution only in the @xmath273 term . it should also be noticed that the schwarzschild solution , except for the @xmath273 term , corresponds exactly with the newtonian potential for holes . in particular , the @xmath270 term corresponds to the mass which was initially removed to form the hole of radius @xmath1 ( negative schwarzschild mass ) , and the @xmath274 term corresponds to the effect of negative gravity , that is , to mass at infinity . the geodesic equations ( 13 ) now become more complicated , so the analysis of the motion of photons and particles is made more complex . thus , at this point , only an educated guess as to the motion of photons and particles outside the hole can be made . because of the outward newtonian force , we claim that particles move outward in the relativistic theory as well . this conclusion also follows from equation ( 14b ) if we neglect the @xmath273 term . in fact , as was remarked earlier , this conclusion follows from continuity at least near the edge of the hole . also , in comparison with equation ( 15c ) , we claim that the trajectories of photons are bent outward in the matter - filled region exterior to the hole because of the negative @xmath0 [ negative schwarzschild mass see discussion after equ . ( 15c ) ] referred to after equation ( 25b ) ( again neglecting @xmath273 ) . thus , the linear theory ( superposition of solutions from section 4.2 and from this section , neglecting @xmath273 ) gives the conclusion that a hole repels matter and energy . in the newtonian theory , we showed that the outward acceleration was due to the effect of mass at infinity " , that is , only that mass outside of a sphere of arbitrarily large radius . from equation ( 14b ) with @xmath237 , it can be seen that the outward acceleration acting on particles is due to the @xmath164 term . thus the cosmological constant @xmath164 is associated with the distant mass , which shows that mach s principle @xcite , at least insofar as it deals with radial forces , is apparently incorporated into einstein s theory through the cosmological constant . this conclusion contrasts with conventional thinking @xcite . inow , consider the equations ( 21 ) outside of the hole , where matter is present . first , it seems likely that zero is a lower bound for the sum @xmath275 [ see equ . ( 18d ) ] . as matter moves away from the hole , the hole ( where @xmath276 ) will expand . in addition , as matter builds up at the edge of the hole and beyond , @xmath3 will increase there , but @xmath175 will also increase due to the increased kinetic activity of the matter there . we will take this to be an additional requirement : @xmath277 next , notice that subtraction of equation ( 21b ) from equation ( 21a ) results in @xmath278 = e^{-\l}\le({{\l ' + \nu ' } \o r}\ri ) . \eqno ( 26)\ ] ] since @xmath279 ( sec . 4.3 ) and @xmath280 , then @xmath281 . compare with ( * ? ? ? ( 9.121 ) ) . let us require further that @xmath282 and @xmath283 . also note from equation ( 21d ) that @xmath284 . now the geodesic equations ( 13 ) will be considered . these reduce to ( for @xmath285 ) @xmath286 @xmath287 @xmath288 @xmath289 @xmath290 one solution of equation ( 27b ) is @xmath291 ( that is , motion takes place entirely in that plane ) , and the corresponding solution of equation ( 27c ) is @xmath292 , where @xmath181 is a constant . using these , equations ( 27a ) and ( 27d ) are simplified to @xmath293 = 0 , \eqno ( 28a)\ ] ] @xmath294 = 0 . \eqno ( 28b)\ ] ] one interesting observation about equation ( 28a ) is that it is a completely general description of the motion of particles or photons in a non - static universe . as such , it also describes motion in a different model where we have a concentration of matter ( rather than a hole ) at the origin in an otherwise uniform universe . physical considerations , as well as superposition of the regular schwarzschild solution for an attracting mass onto the flat geometry of section 4.2 , indicate that matter is accelerated inward and the trajectories of photons are curved inward toward the excess concentration of matter . in that model , @xmath295 and @xmath296 . the conclusion for that model is that @xmath297 for particles and photons . in our model , @xmath298 and @xmath299 , and we expect on exactly the same physical grounds that @xmath300 that is , particles and photons are repelled away from the hole , or are attracted toward the mass in the spherical region s ( see fig . 4 ; note that coordinates in the figure are spherical ) which is symmetrically - placed on the opposite side of the particle or photon from the hole . first , consider motion of a particle . assume that it starts from rest ( @xmath301 ) and travels radially ( @xmath302 ) . equation ( 28a ) can then be written as @xmath303 . \eqno ( 29)\ ] ] by previous assumptions that @xmath304 and @xmath305 , this represents a positive initial acceleration . therefore , @xmath306 initially increases from zero . we conclude that @xmath306 and @xmath307 are both positive on some initial interval @xmath308 . that is , particles are initially accelerated outward away from the hole . physical considerations indicate that this situation will continue forever . on the other hand , if @xmath307 ever turned negative , then @xmath306 would start to decrease , and the troublesome term ( the first one on the right ) in equation ( 29 ) would decrease in significance . in fact , @xmath306 could never become zero with @xmath297 , since that would contradict equation ( 29 ) , so we conclude that @xmath306 is always positive . we infer that @xmath307 is also always positive . now consider the trajectory of a photon , with @xmath309 but @xmath310 . let @xmath311 be a parameter to replace @xmath312 , increasing along the geodesic in the direction of motion . the geodesic equation ( 28a ) has the same form as that for the motion of a particle , with the presence of the @xmath313 term . at the point where @xmath314 ( the point of closest approach to the origin ) , @xmath315 by equation ( 28a ) . by the same reasoning as before , we deduce that @xmath316 from that time forward and infer that @xmath317 for all time . perhaps it is not possible to actually prove mathematically that @xmath307 is positive for particles and photons without a more detailed description of the metric functions @xmath159 and @xmath160 . the main conclusion we wish to draw is that particles and photons are accelerated outward , away from the hole . this result is independent of the actual structure of the metric ( within the restrictions placed on it above ) . it only depends on @xmath281 which , in turn , depends on @xmath279 , a result derived in section 4.3 when dealing with the potential of a hole . we thus see that holes and gravitating bodies have exactly the opposite effect on matter and energy . iwe have shown , on the basis of the newtonian theory , that a spherical hole in an otherwise infinite and uniform universe tends to repel matter . using einstein s theory of general relativity above , we have come to the same conclusion for both matter and photons , the quantum packets of radiation . along the way , we have developed some interesting formul and concepts and have considered einstein s equations for a nonstatic line element and the corresponding geodesics . in addition , we have given a physical explanation of the cosmological constant and have shown the possibility of an infinite , but unstable , universe in the general theory of relativity . the consequences of these new discoveries in the field of cosmology are staggering . below , we develop an entirely new cosmology based upon holes and their repulsive characteristics in an infinite universe . the mathematical results given here form the basis for that development . inow , we consider the implications of this theory to cosmology . we assume that our universe started out in an infinite , uniform configuration infinitely long ago . then we develop some of the logical consequences of such an assumption and show that the resulting universe is surprisingly like our own universe today . in particular , the expansion of the universe can be explained in terms of an accelerating expansion due to negative gravity rather that an explosive but decelerating expansion due to the big bang . of course , any cosmology , especially one which reportedly refutes the big bang theory , must be able to explain several astronomical observations such as the microwave background radiation , the hubble expansion , and the relative abundance of hydrogen , helium , and other elements in the universe , among others . this is done also . in section 5.1 , the history of the universe is developed , starting with an infinite , uniform state , and it is shown how structure could evolve in the universe to its present state . in section 5.2 , the gravitational redshift and some of its consequences for the evolution of the universe are discussed . section 5.3 gives a comparison between this new cosmology and the big bang . iwe showed mathematically , using newtonian mechanics , that there exists an outward gravitational force acting at each point in an infinite universe with a spherical hole whose center is at the origin . at any point at a distance @xmath11 from the center of the hole , the outward force on a mass @xmath0 is given by equation ( 1 ) . then , we came to a similar conclusion using einstein s theory of general relativity . using this idea that an outward force would cause holes to expand , r. n. lewis @xcite showed how structure could form in a universe which started out in a uniform state . the idea is that two spherical holes in an otherwise infinite and uniform universe would migrate toward one another , they would eventually touch and form a three - dimensional figure - eight , and they would eventually merge into one larger sphere . the mass in between the two holes would be pushed aside . if three holes were in close proximity , they too would approach each other and eventually merge , pushing aside the mass between them . four holes in close proximity to each other , however , retain the possibility that they trap some of the mass in between them as they move toward one another , thus forming a larger concentration of matter which would then pull together under its own positive gravitational attraction . we assume the existence of many holes throughout the universe , without specifying how they came into being . perhaps there were always slight imperfections in the uniformity which , as we earlier pointed out , would gradually grow in size . another possibility for the introduction of holes is some quantum effect which would destroy the total uniformity of the universe . whatever the cause , we assume that it repeated itself throughout the universe to form enough holes so that the ensuing evolution described below could occur . these holes , or any regions of lower than average mass density , would expand outward , just as lumps , or regions of higher than average mass density , would attract other mass toward itself . in other words , the infinite , uniform universe is unstable . we can imagine many expanding holes existing throughout the universe . r. n. lewis @xcite referred to this configuration as the swiss - cheese universe . later , as two holes came together , a sheet of matter would form between them , and the sheets of matter , looking at the entire conglomeration , would look like a foamy mixture , named the foam universe . still later , as the holes continue to expand and encroach upon each other s territory , the matter in the sheets would migrate toward the edge of the sheet , forming filaments connecting matter concentrations . this network configuration is referred to as the network universe . even later still , the filaments would split and be drawn gravitationally toward a concentration of matter . this arrangement is referred to as the caltrop universe because the appearance of one of these concentrations of matter is similar to a medieval caltrop . when astronomers peer outward toward other galaxies , they notice just this type of structure . galactic clusters seem to be connected to each other by filaments of galaxies , and , in turn , they appear clustered , not randomly , but in sheets , just the structure predicted above . galaxies and clusters are , in turn , separated from each other by gigantic voids which occur naturally in the above - described theory . it therefore appears that this view of the universe is better able to explain the observed structure of the universe than is the big bang theory , whose proponents are still arguing about how the universe could have differentiated into stars , galaxies , and galactic clusters in the relatively short time since the big bang . what is necessary for the above evolution to have occurred as stated ? the only requirements are an infinite universe , matter distributed somewhat uniformly throughout it , and the existence of randomly - scattered holes . the matter that was once distributed uniformly has been pushed or pulled together into galaxies , surrounded by emptyness , that we observe when looking out into the universe today . assuming that these galaxies are distributed somewhat uniformly throughout our universe , as most cosmologists believe today , then the outward force of negative gravity must also exist at this time , tending to push the universe apart . we can imagine that the universe we observe ( perhaps 10 billion light years or more in radius ) has an average mass density slightly less that that at infinity . one possible mechanism for this to happen is the following . assuming that there were events that occurred to form each of the holes initially all over the universe , it is conceivable that the effect of those events sufficiently far away from us havent been felt yet on earth , so that we on earth observe the average mass density in our neighborhood to be less than that farther out . our neighborhood ( radius unspecified ) of the universe and the galaxies in it , therefore , effectively reside in a large hole , with the force of negative gravity pushing outward of course , under this scenario of locality , this same comment would apply to any observer situated at any point of the universe . therefore , the same lower - than - average mass density and the same expansion must be observed everywhere . ithe outward force due to negative gravity at any point was given above in equation ( 1 ) . in addition to that outward force , there is an additional inward force due to the positive gravitational force of all mass closer to the center of the hole than the mass [ equ.(2 ) ] . the total force was given earlier as equation ( 8a ) . we also gave the corresponding potential as equation ( 8b ) . it is well known that light escaping from a gravitating body undergoes a shift in frequency due to the gravitational field @xcite . the shift is given by @xmath318 where @xmath319 is the frequency of the emitted wave , @xmath320 is its change in frequency , and @xmath321 is the change in potential . in calculating @xmath321 , there is a contribution from the emitting galaxy and one from the observing galaxy ( our own ) , each dependent on the gravitational mass of the respective galaxies . for a galaxy of roughly the same size as our own , these contributions will cancel . on the other hand , a much more massive galaxy may exhibit a relatively large gravitational redshift . there is also a doppler - type effect due to relative velocity , which is currently believed to be the primary cause of observed frequency shift . assuming that the visible universe resides in an expanding hole ( see section 5.1 ) , there will also be a contribution from the potential of the hole due to negative gravity . this newtonian potential [ see equ . ( 8b ) ] is proportional to @xmath265 for large @xmath11 , and could overwhelm the contributions from the other gravitational effects . it could do the same relative to doppler effects as well . it is apparent that whatever frequency shift is observed , at least four causes must be taken into account in the analysis : frequency shift caused by ( 1 ) gravitational effect of emitting galaxy , ( 2 ) gravitational effect of absorbing galaxy , ( 3 ) gravitational effect of negative gravity , and ( 4 ) doppler effect due to relative motion . however , we can conclude that the effects of ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) above reinforce each other , so that the observed redshift is not entirely due to relative motion . in other words , the estimated velocity of recession from observations of redshifted light is exaggerated , especially for galaxies which are relatively far away . in the past , an observed redshift value has been interpreted as indicating a certain distance and velocity of recession ( hubble s law ) . however , if ( negative ) gravitational effects as well as relative motion are taken into account , the observed redshift would indicate a slower ( less doppler redshift ) galaxy which is closer to us . the observed redshift should not be attributed entirely to doppler effects , nor entirely to gravitational effects . the negative gravitational redshift becomes increasingly important the larger that @xmath11 becomes . we note that , for @xmath322 light years , equation ( 30 ) yields a gravitational redshift given by @xmath323 x @xmath324 , which is significant when dealing with galaxies at that distance . in observing distant galaxies , this must be taken into account . for example , the great wall @xcite , distances to which are predicted on the basis of observed redshift values , is at a distance where negative gravitational effects are significant . more importantly , however , these negative gravitational effects will affect the microwave background radiation ( see below ) . because of the above comments , the entire big bang theory needs to be reevaluated in light of negative gravity . an entirely new cosmology based upon expansion due to negative gravity has been developed . r. n. lewis @xcite shows one approach to this . in fact , his explanation gives a simple account for the present structure of the universe which the big bang theory can not explain adequately without internal contradictions . a new cosmology was developed in which large velocities ( see section 3.2 ) are achieved due entirely to the effects of negative gravity over much larger time intervals ( many orders of magnitude ) than are currently believed to be required for expansion to our present state . we also showed that hubble s law holds in this case . for this cosmology , all that is required is that the visible universe , as well as possibly much more , resides in a region of slightly smaller mass density than that at infinity . this would allow negative gravity , as well as all of its consequences , to function . the observed abundances of helium , deuterium , and other heavier elements in the universe can be explained by supernova activity during the longer time intervals . it is currently believed that supernova activity since the big bang was not sufficient to produce anywhere near the amount of heavier elements that are observed in the universe . the amount of helium present is estimated to be from @xmath325 to @xmath326 of the mass of the universe , with a preference for a figure of @xmath327 . it is thought that perhaps one - tenth of that amount could have been produced in supernovas in the @xmath325 billion years since the big bang . in a universe which has been around forever and which may have been nuclearly active for @xmath328 billion years , the observed abundances of helium and other heavier elements could easily have been produced . the uniform microwave background radiation could be accounted for by the radiation of all galaxies . our sun radiates at close to blackbody levels . we expect the same of other stars and galaxies . averaged out over regions of the sky , we expect the radiation coming from other galaxies to be uniform and of blackbody type . indeed , data from the cosmic background explorer @xcite support this conclusion . it is generally agreed that the main nonuniformity in the background radiation is due to the fact that we are in motion relative to the source of that radiation . most cosmologists believe that the motion is due to the big bang . the motion could be due to a general expansion caused by negative gravity . we also expect the radiation from other galaxies to be redshifted because of relative motion . from the discussion above , it is apparent that radiation is also redshifted because of the negative gravitational potential . this redshifted radiation is observed in the microwave region . it is interesting to note that the singularity implicit in equation ( 22b ) ( which gives the metric tensor : @xmath329 ) , @xmath330 yields a redshift from equation ( 30 ) of @xmath331 this value being independent of @xmath332 or @xmath3 . if the microwave background radiation is actually due to an integration of the radiation of all galaxies , it would indicate a redshift of @xmath333 , corresponding to a temperature of 2.73 k and stellar surface temperatures on the order of 5000 k ( possibly less in the cooler , earlier universe ) . thus , it seems likely that the origin of the microwave background radiation must be @xmath334 to @xmath335 times more distant than @xmath336 , if we are to attribute the redshift to gravitational , rather than doppler , effects . more likely , it is due to a combination of the two effects . the singularity needs to be investigated further . however , it must be remembered that our universe is not exactly as modeled , so that the singularity shown above for a uniform universe with a spherical hole may not be a singularity for an uneven universe such as our own . the value @xmath337 found above is larger than most observed galactic redshifts . however , some recent observations of quasar redshifts are on the order of @xmath338 . these can be explained by doppler effects or positive gravitational effects due to incredibly high concentrations of mass , possibly in combination with the negative gravitational redshift . our sun s gravitational redshift is about @xmath323 x @xmath339 . a redshift of @xmath340 could result from a star or quasar with mass - to - radius radio of @xmath323 x @xmath143 times that of our sun . weinberg ( * ? ? ? ( 11.6.20 ) ) gives an upper bound of @xmath341 for gravitational redshift in a universe with zero cosmological constant . as can be seen from the equation before weinberg s equation ( 11.6.20 ) , using our equation ( 11 ) for his @xmath342 , a positive @xmath343 mediates a higher value of @xmath344 . of course this view of cosmology denies the great cosmological principle of isotropy and homogeneity and the principle of covariance by giving preference to centers of holes , at least at the present time . if we travel backward in time , the universe as has been presented here should appear more homogeneous and colder , so that these principles would have been more valid at earlier times . but , of course , as we look outward toward the heavens , we see that the universe is not isotropic nor homogeneous , so this should not be of concern . olbers paradox has an interesting explanation in this new theory of cosmology . wesson @xcite gives an explanation based upon the finite age of the universe and on inflation of the universe . this new theory does not require inflation or the big bang , but we can still invoke wesson s argument of the finite age of the universe by stating that , at earlier times , the universe was less radiant ( less hot ) . furthermore , another interesting explanation lies in the interpretation of the light ray geodesics . these bend outward , so that radiation from far enough away never reaches us ! one final comment deals with whether the universe is open or closed . this and the structure of the universe seem to be two of the most important open questions in the study of cosmology . in any cosmology based upon negative gravity , the universe is not only open , but its expansion is accelerating outward . there is not any great mass pulling it inward . in fact , the mass at infinity " is pulling it apart . iwhy should we believe in a cosmology based upon negative gravity rather than one based upon the big bang ? the big bang theory was developed to explain the observed redshift of light coming from distant galaxies . this redshift , in turn , was explained by attributing it to recessional motion , mainly because no other explanation for the observed redshift was known . this motion was then attributed to a general expansion of the universe . it was argued that this expansion could only be explained by extrapolating back to a time when an explosion ( big bang ) caused the motion we apparently observe today . no other mechanism for expansion was known . the subsequent discovery of the microwave background radiation fit in with this theory very nicely . this radiation was thought to be the remnant radiation left over from the big bang . it was further deduced that the expansion must be decelerating due to the inward pull of the finite mass distribution . the theory was further refined to include other recent observations , including the presence and concentration of heavy elements . the theory still has trouble explaining the observed structure of the universe , including the presence of large voids and the clustering of galaxies . recent observations from the cosmic background explorer @xcite show the early universe " to be almost perfectly uniform and homogeneous , not leaving enough time for matter to have differentiated and formed into the universe that we observe today . the theory of the development of the universe presented here , which is based on negative gravity in an infinite universe , does not have this shortcoming . it predicts the gross structure of the universe on the basis of mass being pushed or pulled together by the combined negative gravitational effects of adjacent holes @xcite . in addition , it presents a viable alternate explanation of the observed redshift of galactic radiation and of the microwave background radiation . the observed redshift of galactic light can be explained as due partly to recessional motion of expansion and partly to gravitational redshift , both ( expansion and gravitational redshift ) caused by the negative gravitational potential of mass at infinity " . it is possible to separate out the contribution to the redshift @xmath344 due to negative gravity and that due to recessional motion , assuming that some form of hubble s law is still valid . in fact , earlier , we showed that @xmath345 ( velocity proportional to distance ) for such a universe , which shows that hubble s law ( with constant @xmath121 ) is valid , without the necessity of extrapolating back in time to a singularity . in addition , the microwave background radiation can also be associated with a redshift of radiation due to the negative gravitational potential . finally , the abundances of elements other than hydrogen can be explained by supernova activity over the incredibly long life of the luminous universe ( at least an order of magnitude larger than is currently believed ) . this new theory predicts an expansion which originated rather benignly in a cold , ( relatively ) motionless , infinite universe and which has accelerated outward and will continue to accelerate outward forever . the purpose of this section is to use some of the equations derived in previous sections to deduce accurate values for the average mass density of the universe , @xmath194 , hubble s constant , @xmath46 , and the cosmological constant , @xmath164 . these calculations are based upon fairly accurate data , including redshift and distance data to specific galaxies . the computations can be done for any such galaxies , but we concentrate on one , m87 , for a variety of reasons . section 6.1 details these reasons and the specific data we use . section 6.2 includes the calculations of the different constants . finally , in section 6.3 , a summary and conclusions as well as justification of the methods developed here are presented . iin order to perform the calculations of the values of the particular constants , specific astronomical data are needed . there are several very good reasons why the galaxy m87 would yield reliable data on which the conclusions we reach are based . second , it is close enough to us that its distance from us can be fairly accurately measured by standard ( not redshift ) means . this measured distance is @xmath347 million light years @xcite . we will use both figures in our calculations . any error in measuring this distance will show up later in our calculation of the values of the constants . m87 is also close enough that small @xmath344 approximations should be valid . third , it lies near the center of the virgo cluster of galaxies , and is relatively motionless with respect to that cluster . therefore , such motions caused by local gravitational effects ( such as rotation about the center ) are not an added complication . we assume that the entire redshift , @xmath344 , is due to universal expansion ( see above for more details ; this expansion is not due to the big bang ) , and that local gravitationally - induced motions are insignificant . m87 is far enough away that this seems to be a reasonable assumption . fourth , m87 lies in the general direction toward which our galaxy and galactic cluster are moving . the observation of our direction of motion is based upon relative microwave background radiation measurements . for this reason , the calculations based upon negative gravity should be relatively accurate on the assumption that the virgo cluster is farther out than we are along a radial direction from the center of expansion . one drawback of using m87 is that it is a huge galaxy relative to our own , roughly @xmath348 times as massive @xcite . as such , it may have associated with it a significant gravitational redshift compared with ours , which may have to be accounted for in the calculations . ignoring this possible gravitational redshift , as we do here , means that the results for @xmath349 and @xmath350 later in this paper are upper bounds and may need to be reduced , thus changing the other calculated values . one problem associated with the use of data from only one galaxy is that the galaxy we choose may not be typical . a more comprehensive study could be done using a statistical analysis of data from many different galaxies , with proper precautions being taken to account for , in particular , the phenomenon referred to in the fourth category above . however , the fact that our calculation below gives a value of the hubble constant in the middle of the experimentally - determined range should convince the reader that m87 is a reasonable choice and that this approach is a sound one . ifirst , using the notation @xmath344 for redshift , we identify three causes of redshift : ( 1 ) redshift due to recessional motion , @xmath349 , ( 2 ) redshift due to negative gravity , @xmath350 , and ( 3 ) gravitational redshift , @xmath351 . for a given value of @xmath344 , the wavelength of the radiation has been shifted by a factor of @xmath352 . therefore , @xmath353 . we assume that @xmath351 is negligible , so that the above equation can be replaced by @xmath354 or in these equations , @xmath157 is the speed of light in a vacuum , @xmath359 is the velocity of recession , @xmath11 is distance , @xmath194 is mass density , and @xmath6 is the gravitational constant . therefore , since the @xmath11 values are line - of - sight distances and are probably greater than the difference in distance from the center of the main expansion , the @xmath11 values should be reduced by an indeterminant amount , thus resulting in a larger value for @xmath194 . the approximate value of @xmath194 used earlier was @xmath47 x @xmath48 kg / m@xmath9 , roughly one - tenth the value calculated above . rubin @xcite finds that the average value of @xmath194 , at least in our visible universe , is @xmath369 x @xmath48 kg / m@xmath9 . this figure is based upon gravitational calculations and is about @xmath370 times larger than observations of luminous matter lead us to believe . thus , rubin s calculations indicate that a large percentage of the matter in the universe is nonluminous . if these are accurate figures , they indicate that the average mass density at infinity is roughly @xmath371 times what it is in our neighborhood , which is in line with the assumption made above and referred to in section 5 . we note that the range of values we derive by this method for hubble s constant is right in the middle of the range of values currently used for that value . it corresponds to the value @xmath373 km / s / mpc . this correlation of values must lend credence to this line of reasoning . it is extremely unlikely that we would end up with this degree of accuracy , compared with experimentally - determined values , if the underlying theory were not correct . iin this section , we have used certain astronomical data , certain well - established formul , and several new formul for calculating the values of the average mass density of the universe , @xmath194 , the hubble constant , @xmath46 , and the cosmological constant , @xmath164 . these values are found to be in the ranges : the fact that @xmath46 lies exactly in the middle of the experimentally - determined range of values for that constant must mean several things . first and most importantly , it signifies that the underlying theory of negative gravity must be correct . otherwise , it would be exceedingly improbable that the calculated value would be anywhere near the experimental value . in fact , we use formula ( 37 ) above which is based upon a gravitational potential which is on the order of @xmath378 times larger than the one normally used in astronomical calculations . with the values of @xmath11 used here , the difference is about @xmath379 orders of magnitude . if the underlying theory were not correct , the calculated values should be different to a corresponding degree . second , it shows that our use of the galaxy m87 was a reasonable choice . third , it serves to pin down the value of the hubble constant even closer . fourth , the values given for the cosmological constant and for the average mass density of the universe should be relatively accurate . it should be pointed out that this is the first attempt to actually assign a nonzero value to the cosmological constant and to calculate the average mass density in an infinite universe . finally , let us observe that , in the above calculations , there were several places where it was indicated that certain values might need to be reduced for various reasons , while , in other places , just the opposite was indicated . again , since the calculated value of the hubble constant falls in the experimentally - determined range , it is reasonable to conclude that the above mentioned changes approximately balance each other . Abstract:
[ "in this paper , the behavior of a spherical hole in an otherwise infinite and uniform universe is investigated . first , the newtonian theory is developed . the concept of negative gravity , an outward gravitational force acting away from the center of the spherical hole , is presented , and the resulting expansion of the hole is investigated . then , the same result is derived using the techniques of einstein s theory of general relativity . the field equations are solved for an infinite uniform universe and then for an infinite universe in which matter is uniformly distributed except for a spherical hole . negative pressure caused by negative gravity is utilized . the physical significance of the cosmological constant is explained , and a new physical concept , that of the gravitational potential of a hole , is discussed . the relationship between the newtonian potential for a hole and the schwarzschild solution of the field equations is explored . finally , the geodesic equations are considered . it is shown that photons and particles are deflected away from the hole . an application of this idea is pursued , in which a new cosmology based upon expanding holes in a uniform universe is developed . the microwave background radiation and hubble s law , among others , are explained . finally , current astronomical data are used to compute a remarkably accurate value of hubble s constant , as well as estimates of the average mass density of the universe and the cosmological constant . i v u = 1" ]
14,316
14,316
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: interest in the gravitational @xmath1-matrix at transplanckian energies @xcite has revived in the past few - years @xcite , when explicit solutions of the so - called reduced - action model @xcite have been found @xcite . the model is a much simplified version of the acv eikonal approach @xcite to transplanckian scattering in string - gravity , and is valid in the regime in which the gravitational radius @xmath2 is much larger than the string length @xmath3 , so that string - effects are supposed to be small . the reduced - action model ( sec . [ s : rcram ] ) was derived by justifying the eikonal form of the @xmath1-matrix at impact parameter @xmath4 on the basis of string dynamics and by then calculating the eikonal itself ( of order @xmath5 ) in the form of a 2-dimensional action , whose power series in @xmath0 corresponds to an infinite sum of proper irreducible diagrams ( the `` multi - h '' diagrams @xcite ) , evaluated in the high - energy limit . the model admits a quantum generalization @xcite of the @xmath1-matrix in the form of a path - integral with definite boundary conditions of the reduced - action exponential itself . the main feature of the model and of its boundary conditions is the existence of a critical impact parameter @xmath6 such that , for @xmath7 the @xmath1-matrix matches the perturbative series and is unitary , while for @xmath8 the field solutions are complex - valued and the elastic @xmath1-matrix is suppressed exponentially . the suppression exponent is of order @xmath9 ( @xmath10 being the planck length ) or , if we wish , of the same order as the entropy of a black - hole of radius @xmath11 . from various arguments we believe that in the region in which @xmath8 ( that is , @xmath4 is smaller than the gravitational radius ) , a classical gravitational collapse is taking place . a key issue related to the collapse region is the possible existence of information loss at quantum level , which in the acv model shows up as lack of @xmath1-matrix unitarity . according to @xcite such unitarity loss is mostly related to a restrictive boundary condition , which is required for the solutions of the model be uv - safe . if such condition is relaxed , further solutions show up , which could contribute to unitarity , but are irregular i.e. , dominated by planckian distances , region in which the model itself is inadequate . the main motivation of the present paper is to improve and complete some unsatisfactory aspects of the reduced - action model which might be crucial at planckian distances , but show up already at distances of order @xmath12 , the gravitational radius . the new model that we shall present here features two improvements . firstly , the eikonal representation itself is embedded in three dimensions , so as to be able to describe the motion of the breit - frame during the scattering process . by comparison , the usual two - dimensional representation is inadequate outside the regime of very small angle scattering , and in particular in the collapse region . in fact , the energy - momentum of the impinging particles is taken to be an external light - like source without any deflection which generates gravitational fields characterized by aichelburg - sexl - like shock waves @xcite . however , the resulting action predicts the einstein deflection angle @xcite and corrections to it @xcite , at variance with the original assumption of frozen sources . instead , we know from the beginning @xcite that in the classical limit the gravitational equations should predict both particle motion and fields in a self - consistent way . for that to be possible , the improved eikonal representation is needed . the additional important improvement of the present model is the treatment of rescattering corrections of the produced gravitons . such effects were argued in @xcite to be of particular interest for the irregular solutions of the model , perhaps explaining their relationship to collapse and their contribution to unitarity . but , independently of such a feature , we shall argue here that even for regular ( uv - safe ) solutions , rescattering corrections are needed in order to achieve self - consistency of motion and metric at higher orders in the eikonal expansion . to start with , we deal with the self - consistency problem at leading level , in which the eikonal refers to frozen undeflected sources , the metric contains two aichelburg - sexl ( as ) shock waves , while the action predicts the einstein deflection angle @xmath13 , as function of the impact parameter @xmath4 and of the gravitational radius @xmath14 ( @xmath15 being the invariant mass of the system ) . the problem in introducing the particle motion is that the kinematical corrections implementing it are of the same relative order ( @xmath16 or higher ) as the irreducible dynamical corrections to the einstein deflection . how to disentangle the former terms from the latter ones ? a hint about solving the question above was provided in ref . @xcite , where it was shown that given the particular coulombic form of the leading eikonal it is possible to take into account the motion of the breit - frame of the particles without affecting the @xmath1-matrix eigenvalue which is still provided by the naive two - dimensional fourier transform . such observation is the basis for our treatment of motion in sec . [ s : ilepp ] , which suggests writing a modified metric , which is self - consistent at leading level . the main difference with the previous one @xcite lies in the introduction of two - body `` shifts '' of t hooft type @xcite , summarizing the action of the leading @xmath1-matrix at two - body level . that is not enough however . the reduced - action model contains the longitudinal fields @xmath17 ( @xmath18 ) characterized by as shock waves centered on the particles with profile functions @xmath19 ( @xmath20 ) ; furthermore , it generates a gravitational wave also with a field @xmath21 defined by the h - diagram . the longitudinal field is here calculated in the improved eikonal representation in sec . [ s : ssw ] and found to be consistent with as waves @xcite which are delayed in time and rotated in space , as suggested in sec .. [ s : ilepp ] . the transverse field , on the other hand , provides corrections to the leading eikonal profiles in @xmath22 and @xmath23 , and causes modifications of the metric inside the light - cone by providing important rescattering corrections . we then set up a perturbative procedure , in order to deal with the self - consistency problem at higher orders in the eikonal expansion . at next order we find the h - diagram deflection @xcite which again appears as a feature of the action , but is not incorporated in the metric , which would require further modifications of the energy - momentum tensor . surprisingly , we find that the class of multi - h diagrams considered in @xcite is not sufficient in order to provide a satisfactory metric at this level but we need to go one further step , and calculate rescattering corrections , which carry the information due to two - body shifts for the produced gravitons . such shifts occur in an approximate solution to the rescattering equations under consideration since a long time @xcite , which is here worked out to completion in sec . [ s : rcram ] . the results so obtained complete the picture of the improved eikonal representation in sec . [ s : ssw ] for corrections of relative order @xmath0 . finally , in sec . [ s : isrp ] we somewhat change subject , and we address the gross features of the ultraviolet - sensitive solutions of the model , whose importance lies in the fact that they could play a role for the recovery of unitarity and/or the related information loss . we then summarize the essential results of the paper and their consequences for action and metric in sec . [ s : conc ] , by discussing also some suggestions which arise from our preliminary analysis of singular solutions . acv @xcite have shown that the leading contributions to the high - energy elastic scattering amplitude come from the @xmath24-channel iteration of soft - graviton exchanges , which can be represented by effective ladder diagrams as in fig . [ f : ladder ] . the purpose of the present section is to recall the method of resumming the effective ladder contributions to all orders so as to provide the so - called eikonal representation for the elastic @xmath1 matrix . this representation is here `` improved '' in the sense that we do not make a separation of longitudinal and transverse variables by neglecting the leading scattering angle . instead , by following @xcite , we use the exact 3-dimensional phase - space of the on - shell particles at each gravitational eikonal exchange and we prove that due to the coulombic form of the exchange the @xmath1-matrix is nevertheless provided by a 2-dimensional transform . -matrix in the eikonal approximation . solid lines : on - shell external particles ; dashed lines : eikonal gravitational exchanges._,scaledwidth=70.0% ] [ f : ladder ] it is important to note that the exchanged gravitons ( dashed lines ) are associated to a propagator @xmath25 and are coupled to the colliding particles / strings ( solid lines ) with an interaction strength equal to @xmath26 for each pair of vertices . furthermore , the particles lines are on - shell along the effective ladder , as proved in ref @xcite by the sum over inelastic excitations also . the generic ladder is thus built by iteration of the basic rung @xmath27 we start computing the 2-rung ladder ( fig . [ f : ladder].b ) @xmath28 in the center - of - mass ( cm ) frame where @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 , the two mass - shell delta functions in eq . ( [ amp2 ] ) become @xmath33 and , for the same reason , the two external mass - shell deltas in eq . ( [ rung2 ] ) constrain @xmath34 , @xmath35 , @xmath36 . in this way , the 4d integration @xmath37 reduces to a 2d integral is a function of @xmath24 and @xmath38 . ] @xmath39 by taking into account the expression of @xmath40 and @xmath41 in terms of @xmath42 , @xmath43 and @xmath44 and using the identity @xmath45 it is easy to evaluate the azimuthal integral in eq . ( [ a2 ] ) and , more interestingly , to show that it can be rewritten as the azimuthal integral of a pure 2d propagator : @xmath46 where @xmath47 and @xmath48 are fictitious 2d vectors with the same modulus as @xmath49 and @xmath50 respectively , and @xmath51 is the angle between them . with this trick , @xmath52 can be rewritten as a 2d convolution : @xmath53({\boldsymbol{q } } ) \ ; , \quad ( { \boldsymbol{q}}^2=-q^2)\;.\ ] ] it is now straightforward to generalize that procedure to the @xmath54-rung ladder , by deriving the recursion formula @xmath55 \;. \label{ampn}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it should be noted that such simplification is due to the peculiar form of the graviton interaction from which eq . ( [ azimuthal ] ) follows . finally , the eikonal @xmath1 matrix ( with overall momentum conservation factored out ) is given by the sum of the ladder diagrams with the usual combinatorial factor @xmath56 and with the final - state mass - shell deltas removed : [ seik ] @xmath57 \;.\ ] ] by applying a 2d fourier transform to eq . ( [ ssum ] ) , convolutions become standard products and the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ ssum ] ) reduces to an exponential series : @xmath58 where we interpret the 2d fourier transform of the one - graviton amplitude @xmath59 as _ eikonal action _ @xmath60 . actually , the definition of @xmath60 ( and of all convolutions involved in this calculation ) requires the introduction of an infrared cutoff @xmath61 in order to regularize the `` coulomb '' divergence typical of long - range interactions @xmath62 : @xmath63 where @xmath64 and @xmath65 . a couple of remarks are in order : * the `` position '' variable @xmath66 , being conjugate to @xmath47 , is usually interpreted as impact parameter of the collision , and @xmath67 as the associated phase shift . however , @xmath47 is a fictitious 2d vector whose polar angle is actually undefined , therefore @xmath66 can not be thought of as a purely transverse ( to @xmath68 ) vector . * the dependence of @xmath69 on @xmath70 amounts to a @xmath4-independent phase , and therefore it is unimportant in the determination of the scattering angle . however such a phase depends on the total energy @xmath71 . this may cause a cutoff - dependent time evolution of the scattered particles , hopefully without physical consequences . both issues will be discussed in detail in the next section . the purpose of this section is to derive the motion of two quantum particles subject to a scattering amplitude given by the leading eikonal result of @xcite and recalled in sec . [ s : ersa ] . suppose we prepare a state of two well separated light - like free particles in the past . in a first - quantization description the wave function is given by @xmath73 in the far future the wave function is expressed in terms of the @xmath1-matrix as follows : @xmath74 it is convenient to perform the calculation in the cm frame . as usual , we define the cm coordinate @xmath75 and relative coordinate @xmath76 [ cmcoordinates ] @xmath77 for simplicity , we limit ourselves to states which have zero total momentum , by setting [ wavefunc ] @xmath78 with this restriction the cm coordinate is completely delocalized , but we can build a state representing a localized wave packet in the relative coordinate : @xmath79 where @xmath80 is the relative momentum , @xmath81 is its mean value and @xmath82 a measure of its broadening , @xmath83 is a normalization factor , @xmath84 is the total cm energy , while @xmath85 is the relative position at time @xmath86 . in fact , by inserting eqs . ( [ wavefunc ] ) into eq . ( [ d : psiin ] ) we are left with an integral in @xmath87 whose phase @xmath88 is stationary for @xmath89 since the shape of @xmath90 forces @xmath91 . going back to particles coordinates , we confirm that in the past each particle moved at the speed of light in the direction of @xmath92 : @xmath93 on the other hand , by substituting eqs . ( [ wavefunc ] ) in the outgoing wave ( [ d : psiout ] ) together with the energy - momentum conserving eikonal @xmath1-matrix ( [ seik ] ) @xmath94 we find @xmath95 where @xmath47 and @xmath66 are auxiliary 2d vectors , the former being determined by the condition @xmath96 . in this case , the stationarity of @xmath97 with respect to independent variations of @xmath87 , @xmath98 and @xmath66 yields the asymptotic motion in the future , as follows . in the plane of scattering @xmath99 we introduce the polar angles @xmath100 of momenta and coordinates , and write @xmath101 where we used the notation @xmath102 , @xmath64 , @xmath103 and the relations @xmath104 , @xmath105 . we can now determine the five unknowns @xmath106 , @xmath107 , @xmath108 and @xmath66 by finding the stationarity point of the phase with respect to variations of the five integration variables @xmath109 , @xmath107 , @xmath108 and @xmath66 , while @xmath86 and @xmath85 are known parameters . we have @xmath110 where @xmath111 denotes the sign of @xmath112 . the first equation causes @xmath66 to be aligned with @xmath49 ( @xmath113 ) and to have modulus @xmath114 the second equation yields a further relation involving the physical impact parameter @xmath115 : @xmath116 allowing us to determine the ( attractive ) scattering angle @xmath117 @xmath118 the third equation identifies the outgoing trajectory to be the straight line @xmath119 with the same impact parameter of the incoming one , thus implying angular momentum conservation . note that this trajectory intersects the incoming one at the point @xmath120 , as is apparent from fig . [ f : deflection ] . [ f : deflection ] the fourth equation provides the motion of the outgoing relative coordinate @xmath121 meaning that each particle keeps on moving at the speed of light . a very peculiar behaviour of our result is that the motion of the outgoing particles suffers a time delay given by the energy - derivative of the action @xmath122 with respect to a motion with the same deflection but at constant speed . this is easily seen by projecting the incoming trajectory ( [ xin ] ) on @xmath87 @xmath123 and by choosing the origin of time @xmath124 when @xmath125 is ( or would be ) at the intersection point @xmath126 of the trajectories ( [ outtraj],[inmotion ] ) , i.e.@xmath127 , so that eqs . ( [ inmotion],[motion ] ) become @xmath128 showing that @xmath129 at @xmath130 . let us stress that this time delay is peculiar of gravity , since the energy dependence of the amplitude stems from the gravitational coupling @xmath131 . in other theories , like electrodynamics , the coupling is independent of the particles energies , and one obtains analogous equations with @xmath132 . we have seen that the leading eikonal @xmath1-matrix provides a definite scattering angle and wave - packet motion . it also provides a gravitational metric , associated to the gravitaional fields @xmath133 , whose longitudinal terms are expressed in terms of the eikonal amplitude @xmath134 as follows @xcite [ hfields ] @xmath135 where @xmath136 and we actually deal with the situation before collision ( @xmath137 ) . the collision process , according to the reduced action model to be described in sec . [ s : rcram ] , introduces further ( transverse ) components of the metric field , and modifies the expressions ( [ hfields ] ) by corrections of relative order @xmath0 and higher . nevertheless , at leading level , starting from the ( improved ) eikonal representation only , it should be possible to describe the scattering on the basis of an associated metric . here we suggest a simple way to do it , which is based on t hooft s understanding @xcite of the @xmath1-matrix as a coordinate shift . the starting point is to write the leading order metric before collision , provided by the expressions ( [ hfields ] ) as follows : @xmath138 \;.\ ] ] we see that it consists of two aichelburg - sexl ( as ) shock waves @xcite travelling against each other . if only one is present the one at @xmath139 , say , a test particle impinging on it will acquire a shift in the @xmath140 direction : @xmath141 as a consequence , after the shift , the test particle will be deflected . in particular , if the particle was moving at fixed @xmath140 and @xmath142 , the scattering angle @xmath143 is given by @xmath144 , see fig . [ f : deflection ] . the scattering angle formula is derived by either calculating the action @xmath145 of eq . ( [ amp1b ] ) from the shift ( [ vshift ] ) as in ref . @xcite and then using eq . ( [ angle ] ) , or by computing the geodesics by standard methods . denote the transverse direction starting from the center of mass ( cm ) of the two colliding particles . at the point @xmath146 ( @xmath147 ) the test particle leaves the first ( second ) wave front._,scaledwidth=60.0% ] [ f : doppioshift ] the next question is : what happens when both as waves are present ? in order to understand that , consider a test particle at @xmath148 , travelling along with particle 1 ( @xmath149 ) shortly before it . then , at @xmath139 ( @xmath150 ) the test particle will collide with particle 2 and will acquire the shift ( [ vshift ] ) , while the location of particle 1 will be forced to do the same with @xmath151 , evaluated at the `` on shell '' point @xmath152 ( @xmath153 ) , see fig . [ f : doppioshift ] . next , the test particle trajectory is deflected on a trajectory @xmath154 , @xmath155 , therefore , due to the @xmath40 factor , it will be shortly hit by particle 1 , travelling at @xmath156 , and thus will acquire the shift @xmath157 to sum up , the test particle acquires two shifts @xmath158 separated by a short time interval @xmath159 , which vanishes in the @xmath160 limit . as a consequence , it is natural to assume that particle 1 acquires two shifts also : @xmath161 where @xmath162 is actually a possibly singular parameter describing the scattering of particle 1 on itself , which is here taken to be a @xmath115-independent constant , @xmath163 . taking into account both shifts , particle 1 goes from @xmath164 to @xmath165 at time @xmath166 and is then deflected by an angle @xmath167 on the trajectory means `` rotated '' ; see also eqs . ( [ rotation ] ) . ] [ coor ] @xmath168 where we recall that @xmath169 . the total collision time from @xmath164 to @xmath170 is therefore @xmath171 from the stationarity condition of the collision time with respect to @xmath172 , we obtain the scattering angle @xmath173 where @xmath174 is `` on - shell '' . since @xmath175 , eq . ( [ scatang ] ) is consistent with the action determination , at leading level : @xmath176 besides providing the scattering angle , the double - shift picture has a strict analogy with the wave packet motion in sec . [ s : wpm ] . the former can be summarized in 3 steps : * the `` come - back '' motion from @xmath164 back to @xmath177 , taking the time @xmath178 which is just the retardation time with respect to travel at the speed of light ; * the motion along the residual shift @xmath179 , taking time @xmath180 = \xi\tan\frac{\bar\theta}{2}\;,\ ] ] where we have defined the angular shift @xmath181 as in fig . [ f : doppioshift ] ; * the motion along the deflected trajectory , taking time @xmath182 by comparison , in the wave packet motion the delay time is just the same , while steps ( b ) ( travel to point @xmath183 joining incoming and outgoing trajectories ) and ( c ) ( travel to @xmath184 ) both take time @xmath185 . although different , the expressions ( [ timeb ] ) and ( [ timec ] ) correspond to the total time @xmath186\ ] ] whose difference with the former is of relative order @xmath0 , because both @xmath187 and @xmath181 are of order @xmath188 . therefore the two pictures coincide at leading order . similarly , the outgoing impact parameter is @xmath189\ ] ] which differs from the incoming one by relative order @xmath0 also . furthermore both differences vanish in the limit @xmath190 , which is obtained by setting @xmath191 this model , that we could call the `` linear model '' , could be described by the scattering of extended sources , in which the energy of each source inside a disk of radius @xmath106 increases like @xmath106 . we conclude that the double - shift picture provides us with some understanding of the evolution of the metric at collision and after , which is satisfactory at leading level , even if a full account of the collision process is lacking . the basic features argued so far are : * the existence of a delay time @xmath192 which causes a shift of either shock wave around @xmath193 in the form @xmath194 around particle 1 , with a similar one for particle 2 ; * the deflection of the particle trajectories , causing a rotation by the scattering angle @xmath187 for @xmath195 and reaching @xmath184 at the collision time @xmath196 @xmath197 where the rotated coordinates are @xmath198 therefore , the particle motion occurs explicitly in the expression of the metric , that we could call at this point , a self - consistent leading metric . field ( red cross ) . the parametrization of momenta is choosen so as to simplify the the calculations._,scaledwidth=90.0% ] [ f : simpleinsertion ] we have seen before how the improved eikonal model is able to describe particle motion at leading level ( sec . [ s : wpm ] ) , and how this feature can be incorporated by trajectory shifts in the corresponding shock - waves ( sec . [ s : sdts ] ) . we want now to show how the shock - wave fields can be explicitly derived from the sum of diagrams describing eikonal scattering , as defined in sec . [ s : ersa ] . we confirm in this way the delay shifts introduced previously , leading eventually to the scattered energy - momentum . in order to calculate the fields @xmath199 and @xmath200 we should consider the eikonal diagrams ( fig . [ f : ladder ] ) in presence of a linearly coupled external source ( @xmath201 , @xmath202 ) which generates the fields by a functional derivative of the corresponding semiclassical @xmath1-matrix or , in other words , of the corresponding action . we can write @xmath203 and compute the result by inserting the @xmath202 source on the eikonal diagrams , in all possible ways . since the external current diagrams generate insertions of momentum @xmath204 and thus generally do not conserve energy - momentum , we should restore time - ordered integrations in order to evaluate them properly . since @xmath200 is coupled to @xmath205 only , the @xmath206 conservation is not affected , and it is sufficient to consider @xmath207-ordered diagrams as depicted in fig . [ f : simpleinsertion ] . let us first consider the small scattering angle kinematics @xmath208 , in which the longitudinal dynamics is separated from the transverse one . in order to understand the issue , let us start from the simplest diagrams in fig . [ f : simpleinsertion ] . we notice that , while the @xmath209-exchange in the eikonal line has negligible @xmath210 because of two mass - shell conditions @xmath211 , the @xmath204-exchange has only one , @xmath212 , so that some @xmath213 is still allowed , provided @xmath214 . therefore @xmath215 is still negligible , but the @xmath216 leakage should be considered in the @xmath217 evolution . in the example of fig . [ f : simpleinsertion ] we choose to couple the @xmath202 current to initial and final particles of type 1 symmetrically , ) with a wave function having energy centered around @xmath218 , which amounts to setting @xmath219 and @xmath220 . ] so that a @xmath216-independent factor of @xmath221 is factored out . in this way , the lowest - order diagram in fig . [ f : simpleinsertion].a yields the born - level field @xmath222 where @xmath223 is the leading profile function of the shock - wave . on the other hand , the @xmath209-exchange yields the leading eikonal @xmath224 coupled to the charge @xmath225 , where @xmath226 according to eq . ( [ h0++ ] ) . therefore , diagram [ f : simpleinsertion].b predicts a ( subleading ) contribution to @xmath200 [ h1bc ] @xmath227\ ] ] while diagram [ f : simpleinsertion].c yields @xmath228\ ] ] because of the opposite sign in @xmath216 and @xmath207 . we shall interpret the results ( [ h1bc ] ) as the first order expansion in @xmath229 of a shifted field @xmath230 which is retarded ( advanced ) for @xmath231 ( @xmath232 ) . therefore , the result ( [ h++sh ] ) confirms the delay - shift of sec . [ s : sdts ] , in a form which is appropriate for the calculation of the real part of the action @xmath233 , or to the principal - value prescription of the @xmath234 propagator . ( red cross ) . the blobs represent ladders of eikonal exchanges._,scaledwidth=65.0% ] [ f:2bolle ] ( red cross)._,scaledwidth=36.0% ] [ f:2prop1x ] the higher - order contributions to the shifted field are computed from their definition in fig . [ f:2bolle ] . in order to do the explicit calculation , we have to explain in more detail how the @xmath207-ordering just mentioned is generated from the usual @xmath235-ordering in perturbation theory . we shall work off energy - shell , but on mass - shell for the intermediate particles so that , in the example of fig . [ f:2prop1x ] , @xmath236 , @xmath237 , , @xmath238 . therefore , to each eikonal exchange , we assign the energy differences in the center of mass frame @xmath239 , e.g. , @xmath240 and so on.s occurring in the last equation s line is sufficient to our purposes , because we shall need it around @xmath241 . the argument is therefore valid for the finite - angle kinematics too . ] the ordered time integrations , up to time @xmath235 of the field , yield therefore the factor @xmath242}{[{\varepsilon}+{\mathrm{i}}(\delta_1+\delta_2)]\ , [ { \varepsilon}+{\mathrm{i}}\delta_1 ] } \to \frac{\exp[{\mathrm{i}}(\delta_1+\delta_2)t]}{2 ( { \varepsilon}+{\mathrm{i}}\delta_2)({\varepsilon}+{\mathrm{i}}\delta_1 ) } \;,\ ] ] where the last expression is obtained after @xmath243 symmetrization , because of the integrations on @xmath244 , @xmath245 induced by @xmath246 , @xmath247 , with a factor which is symmetrical under @xmath248 permutations . finally the factorized @xmath249 integrations induced by the angular ones on the @xmath248 s are done separately , by using the identity @xmath250 in which the integration contour is closed in the upper ( lower ) half - plane for @xmath251 ( @xmath137 ) by noting that corrections due to the large @xmath252 contour are exponentially small in @xmath253 in our finite angle kinematics . similarly , the time and @xmath252 integrations can be done after the insertion , and yield @xmath254 this means that eikonal echanges occurring both before and after the insertion are suppressed , in the @xmath255-functions so that overlap of subsequent contributions is allowed for a limited time . the uncertainty so introduced in the time of shift is expected to be larger than @xmath256 because of the number of coherent reinteractions , but in any case smaller than @xmath11 , which would correspond to the maximal number @xmath257 of leading eikonal scatterings . ] because of @xmath258 , so that the whole sum reduces to the diagrams in fig . [ f:1bolla1x ] . ._,scaledwidth=80.0% ] [ f:1bolla1x ] in order to compute them we first diagonalize the scattering amplitude in impact parameter @xmath66 space and we then compute the inserted field by fourier transform in the @xmath259 variables , in order to yield its @xmath260 dependence . the non - trivial point about impact parameter transform is that it is 2-dimensional , while the integration variables @xmath261 and @xmath262 ( in , say fig . [ f:2prop1x ] ) are 3-dimensional in the finite angle kinematics . fortunately , the conditions @xmath263 fix the 3-components of both @xmath261 and @xmath49 , by determining the directions of the respective breit frames . we thus have the bessel transform @xmath264 which , by the clever identity ( [ azimuthal ] ) yields the same result as the 2-dimensional azimuthal average @xmath265 which is a 2-dimensional convolution diagonalized in @xmath66-space . we thus obtain that the amplitude in front of the field insertion resums to the exponentiated result @xmath266 and cancels out with the factor @xmath267 in eq . ( [ derfunz ] ) . we are left with the calculation of the @xmath200 field itself . notice that in fig . [ f:1bolla1x].b the insertion is on the incoming leg @xmath87 , while in fig . [ f:1bolla1x].a it occurs on the final leg @xmath268 . since @xmath269 because of the mass - shell plus energy - conservation constraints , the difference is just a rotation @xmath270 by the angle @xmath271 . when inserted in the field propagator it leads to a rotated variable projection should be rotated also with the @xmath272-axis in the direction of the deflected longitudinal direction . ] @xmath273 with a mass - shell condition^{-1}$ ] . however , for @xmath274 the contour can be closed on the pole , with the same result , while for @xmath275 it vanishes . this remark confirms the ordering @xmath276 ( see app . [ a : hdi ] ) . ] @xmath277 , and we get @xmath278 where we have neglected the exponent dependence on @xmath279 , when @xmath280 is a very small variable if we make the natural assumption @xmath281 , insuring that the field insertion does not modify the scattering angle . ( @xmath199 ) generated by particle 1 ( 2 ) , here represented by the blue ( red ) line . _ ] [ f : shiftedshocks ] finally , by taking the value @xmath282 of the initial energy as we did in the beginning , we get for the field a factorized value proportional to @xmath283 which translates @xmath284 into @xmath276 . the complete resummation in fig . [ f:2bolle ] is thus summarized in the exponentiated form @xmath285 \times \nonumber \\ & \qquad\left\{2\pi r\left[\theta(-x^+)\delta(x^-)a_0({\boldsymbol{x}})+\theta(x^+)\delta(x^-_r)a_0({\boldsymbol{x}}_r ) \right]\right\ } \nonumber \\[1 mm ] & = 2\pi r \left [ \delta\big(x^-_r-\pi r a_0(b)\big ) a_0({\boldsymbol{x}}_r)\theta(x^+ ) + \delta\big(x^- + \pi r a_0(b)\big ) a_0({\boldsymbol{x}})\theta(-x^+)\right]\;. \label{hppr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] an identical calculation with the exchange @xmath286 yields an analogous result for the field @xmath287 . the overall situation is depicted in fig . [ f : shiftedshocks ] , where we show the shifted ( and slightly rotated ) shock waves , on which the source particles lie before and after the collision ( solid lines ) . the evolution of the particles during the collision actually depends on the reference frame used to describe their motion . for instance , a time - like observer that crosses first shock 2 ( the one on the bottom - right ) describes the scattering in two steps : firstly the shock 2 drags shock 1 and particle 1 by an amount @xmath288 in the @xmath140 direction ; then shock 1 drags shock 2 and particle 2 in the @xmath207 direction . in this frame particle 1 travels along the dashed blue line in fig . [ f : shiftedshocks ] . a symmetric description is given by an observer crossing first shock 1 , which `` sees '' particle 2 moving along the dashed red line . the transplanckian field equations in the acv proposal @xcite were based on two main groups of results . firstly , the acv investigation of string - gravity showed that at transplanckian energies @xmath289 ( @xmath290 ) the eikonal representation with an eikonal operator which is calculable in principle by expanding in @xmath291 and @xmath188 yields a good representation of the scattering amplitude , and incorporates both string- and strong - gravity effects . secondly , in the regime @xmath292 in which string effects are supposed to be small , the irreducible eikonal diagrams are much in correspondence with the effective action of lipatov and co - workers @xcite , who calculated a regge - graviton emission vertex @xcite which is the building block of the effective lagrangian used in @xcite . finally , the equations of motion of the latter by neglecting rescattering terms were shown to yield a shock - wave solution for the fields which is the basis for the reduced - action model investigated in detail in later years @xcite . here , we have considered so far only the leading graviton - exchange kernel in the eikonal , and we have improved the amplitude representation based on it , so as to include a motion of the breit - frame on which the exchange is defined . next , we want to reconsider the field equations in 4-dimensions including rescattering and we shall provide a solution for the fields which fits very well in our understanding of scattering developed so far , by adding corrections which are of relative order @xmath0 and higher . in the effective action framework , the elastic @xmath1-matrix of the tree diagrams in fig . [ f : subldiagrams ] is given in terms of the classical solutions of the lagrangian equation of motion as @xmath293 where @xmath294 and @xmath295 are just rescaled versions of the longitudinal fields considered so far , @xmath296 is related to the transverse field which is proportional to @xmath297 , and @xmath298 represents ( up to an unconventional but convenient factor of @xmath299 ) the energy - momentum tensor of the colliding particles . the usual metric components are given by @xcite @xmath300 + \frac{\kappa}{4 } \left [ \epsilon_{\mu\nu}^{tt } { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}^2\re\phi - \epsilon_{\mu\nu}^{lt } { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}^2\im\phi\right ] { \mathrm{d}}x^\mu { \mathrm{d}}x^\nu \ ; , \label{hmunudxdx}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath301 denotes the transverse laplacian and the @xmath302 s denote graviton polarizations to be specified below . the lagrangian is conveniently written in terms of real light - cone variables @xmath303 , @xmath304 and a complex transverse variable @xmath305 , @xmath306 . it consists of a kinetic term @xmath307 where the longitudinal fields have a mostly transverse propagator and the ( complex ) @xmath296 field a mostly longitudinal one , of a graviton emission term @xmath308 incorporating lipatov s vertex @xcite , and finally , of a rescattering term @xmath309 which is supposed to take into account the rescattering diagrams of fig . [ f : subldiagrams].c , d . this term is quadratic in @xmath296 , and is likely to play a role when the latter is large . ; _ ( b ) _ a `` multi - h '' diagram of order @xmath310 involving only lipatov s vertices ( red disks ) ; _ ( c ) _ the first diagram with a rescattering vertex ( green triangle ) is of order @xmath311 , but actually vanishes on - shell ; _ ( d ) _ the first nonvanishing rescattering diagram is of order @xmath310._,scaledwidth=95.0% ] [ f : subldiagrams ] notice in particular in eq . ( [ emissionterm ] ) the current @xmath312 , which describes transverse graviton emission @xcite in the so - called h - diagram @xcite and is non - local because of the inverse laplacian needed to find it . for this reason it has been convenient to introduce the complex field @xmath296 , which corresponds to two graviton polarizations . the detailed computation shows that @xmath313 and , more generally , using a notation with real - valued indices , that @xmath314 where @xmath315 so that we have the polarizations @xmath316 the resulting equations of motion are given by [ eqs ] @xmath317 + \frac12\kappa\sqrt{s}\delta^2({\boldsymbol{x}})\delta(x^- ) \nonumber \\ & \qquad = -\kappa\left({\partial^2}\phi^*{\partial^2}_-{\partial^{*2}}\phi \;+\;(\partial\leftrightarrow\partial^ * ) \right ) \label{eqh } \\ & 4\partial_+\partial_- |\partial|^4\phi -\kappa \left [ { \partial^{*2}}{\tilde{h}}^{++}{\partial^2}{\tilde{h}}^{-- } - { |\partial|^2}{\tilde{h}}^{++}{|\partial|^2}{\tilde{h}}^{--}\right ] \nonumber \\ & \qquad= \kappa \left [ { \partial^{*2}}\left({\tilde{h}}^{++}{\partial^2}_+{\partial^2}\phi\right ) + { \partial^2}\left({\tilde{h}}^{--}{\partial^2}_-{\partial^{*2}}\phi\right ) \;+\;(\partial\leftrightarrow\partial^*)\right ] \ ; , \label{eqphi } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the rescattering terms are set on the r.h.s . , with similar equations for @xmath318 and @xmath319 . notice that in eqs . ( [ eqs ] ) the impinging particles are represented by the frozen external sources @xmath201 and @xmath202 written in eq . ( [ enmomtens ] ) , which pertain to the collinear kinematics used before . according to this small - angle approach , scattering comes out because of a non - trivial action , but is not taken into account in the energy - momentum of the particles . shortly , we shall take a somewhat different attitude . we start recalling @xcite that , if the rescattering terms are dropped , eqs . ( [ eqs ] ) admit a shock - wave solution of the form [ separation ] @xmath320 where the metric component @xmath321 are of as type @xcite while the transverse field @xmath296 has support inside the whole _ light - wedges _ @xmath322 . the latter propagation , of retarded plus advanced type , corresponds to the principal value part of the feynman propagators , as is appropriate for the real part of the amplitude . the field equations ( [ eqs ] ) induce a set of differential equations on @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath323 , which can be solved on the basis of proper boundary conditions which make them regular , i.e. , ultraviolet safe . furthermore , by replacing the expressions ( [ separation ] ) into ( [ eqs ] ) and omitting the rescattering term , we obtain the acv equations of motion and the corresponding reduced action @xmath324 \big\ } \ ; , \label{reda}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have freely performed some integration by parts , assuming a smooth enough ultraviolet behaviour of the solutions , and we have replaced the current @xmath312 by its reduced counterpart @xmath325 : @xmath326 we state below some of the properties of the ram solutions @xcite in the particularly simple case of axisymmetric sources like particle - ring scattering which is relevant for the azimuthal averaged particle - particle case . by assuming the real fields @xmath327 , @xmath328 and the complex field @xmath329 to be functions of @xmath330 only , and by calling @xmath331 , @xmath332 the axisymmetric sources , we soon realize that the action @xmath333 can be recast in one - dimensional form . this is because the current @xmath325 defined by eq . ( [ defhc ] ) is simply obtained in this case by setting @xmath334 where the dot denotes the @xmath335-derivative and is therefore real and axisymmetric also . as a consequence , the interaction term involves @xmath336 only and is proportional to the @xmath337 kinetic term as follows @xmath338 \qquad \left(\cdot \equiv \frac{{\mathrm{d}}}{{\mathrm{d}}r^2 } \right ) \;.\ ] ] here we have replaced @xmath323 by the auxiliary field @xmath339 a sort of renormalized squared distance defined by @xmath340 \ ; , \qquad h \equiv { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}^2\phi = 4\frac{{\mathrm{d}}}{{\mathrm{d}}r^2}(r^2\dot\phi ) = \frac{1}{(\pi r)^2}(1-\dot\rho ) \;,\ ] ] which incorporates the @xmath323-@xmath22-@xmath23 interaction . furthermore , the field @xmath323 is now taken to be real - valued , describing the @xmath341 polarization only . the external axisymmetric sources @xmath24 and @xmath342 are able to approximately describe the particle - particle case by setting @xmath343 , @xmath344 , where the azimuthal acv averaging procedure is assumed . the equations of motion , derived from the reduced - action ( [ 1dimaction ] ) and specialized to the case of particles at impact parameter @xmath4 ( with the axisymmetric sources just quoted ) , provide the profile functions @xmath345 from the analogue of eq . ( [ eqh ] ) , and the @xmath346-field ( or @xmath323-field ) @xmath347 from the analogue of eq . ( [ eqphi ] ) . ( [ eomrho ] ) shows a `` coulomb '' potential in @xmath346-space , which is repulsive for @xmath348 , acts for @xmath349 and plays an important role in the tunneling phenomenon @xcite . by replacing the equation of motion ( [ eoma ] ) into eq . ( [ 1dimaction ] ) , the reduced action can be expressed in terms of the @xmath346 field only , and takes the simple form @xmath350 \equiv -\int_0^\infty { \mathrm{d}}r^2 \ ; { \mathcal{l}}(\rho,\dot\rho , r^2 ) \;,\ ] ] which is the one we shall consider at quantum level in the following . the effective metric generated by the axisymmetric fields @xmath346 , @xmath22 and @xmath23 was calculated @xcite on the basis of the complete form of the shock - wave ( [ separation ] ) and is given by @xmath351 \nonumber \\ & + ( { \mathrm{d}}x^+)^2 \delta(x^{+ } ) \left [ 2\pi r \bar{a}(r^2 ) -{{\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}}(1-\dot\rho ) |x^{-}| \right ] \nonumber \\ & + ( { \mathrm{d}}x^-)^2 \delta(x^{- } ) \left [ 2\pi r a(r^2 ) -{{\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}}(1-\dot\rho ) |x^{+}| \right ] \nonumber \\ & + { \mathrm{d}}r^2\left[1 + 2(\pi r)^2\theta(x^{+}x^{-})\dot{\phi } \right ] + { \mathrm{d}}\theta^2\,r^2 \left[1 + 2(\pi r)^2\theta(x^{+}x^{-})(\dot{\phi } + 2r^2\ddot{\phi})\right ] \;. \label{metr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this metric is dynamically generated and may be regular or singular at short distances , depending on the behaviour of the field solutions themselves . it is not fully consistent , however , since it does not take into account the longitudinal shifts that the fields cause to each other . in the following sections we shall compute such shifts at subleading level and we shall present the improved expression of the self - consistent metric . the first nontrivial use of the reduced action ( [ reda ] ) is the calculation of the first order correction to the einstein deflection @xcite which is due to the h - diagram contribution to the action ( fig . [ f : subldiagrams].a ) . the latter is obtained by expanding the action ( [ reda ] ) and the corresponding equations of motion ( quoted in eqs . ( [ eoma],[eomrho ] ) for the axisymmetric case ) in the parameter @xmath0 where @xmath352 is the gravitational radius and @xmath4 is the impact parameter conjugated to the transverse momentum @xmath209 ( and related to the true impact parameter @xmath115 by eq . ( [ b0 ] ) ) . by expanding the equations of motion we obtain first order corrections to the profile function @xmath353 and to the transverse field @xmath354 as consequence of the lipatov s vertex @xmath312 in eq . ( [ emissionterm ] ) . it is then straighforward to obtain for the action @xcite @xmath355 \;,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath356 and the h - diagram contribution is @xmath357 in the following , we specialize the expression ( [ hdiagram ] ) to the axisymmetric case ) ) which is due to the @xmath358 polarization and is to be subtracted out by the exponentiation procedure of ref @xcite . ] in which , according to eq . ( [ rho ] ) , @xmath359 and by the equations of motion ( [ eomrho ] ) we obtain the result @xmath360 as contribution of the @xmath341 polarization only . here we have used the regular solution of eq . ( [ eomrho ] ) @xmath361 where @xmath362 and @xmath363 is the largest real solution of eq . ( [ tbcond ] ) . the complete result , including the @xmath364 polarization would be @xcite @xmath365 and provides by stationarity of the eikonal phase the scattering angle @xmath366 \;.\ ] ] the recollection above suggests to generalize the calculation of the shifted field @xmath200 in sec . [ s : ssw ] to the next order in the @xmath188 expansion , by including the h - diagram in the eikonal . in so doing we find 3 kinds of insertions of the @xmath200 source , illustrated in fig . [ f : hdiagraminsertions ] : _ ( a ) _ insertions on the on - shell propagators , which can be done in a similar way as we did the leading one ; _ ( b ) _ insertions on the particle propagators of the h - dagram itself , and _ ( c ) _ insertions on the emitted transverse field @xmath367 . the latter are new and involve the rescattering vertex , which is omitted in the ram calculation and will be included in the next subsection . ( red cross ) on the h - diagram._,scaledwidth=90.0% ] [ f : hdiagraminsertions ] insertions of type _ ( a ) _ above add up to the leading shift @xmath368 and are done by replacing @xmath217 with @xmath369 in the corresponding energy charge . between past and future . note that in the acv equations framework the profile function @xmath134 and the shift @xmath370 occur together in the product @xmath371 ( eq . ( [ eqd ] ) ) , while in the insertion formalism @xmath372 is probed by the leading profile @xmath373 only , which dominates for @xmath374 . ] however , @xmath375 contains two @xmath217 factors and thus acquires a factor of 2 , as follows @xmath376 \nonumber \\ & = 2\pi gs ( a_0 + a_h ) + 2\pi r(a_0 + 2 a_h){\mathrm{i}}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^- } + \cdots \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the outcome is that the overall shift @xmath377 is proportional to @xmath378 , as given by the perturbative formula ( [ h++sh ] ) : @xmath379 and thus it extends to the h - diagram the relationship between shift and energy - derivative of the action suggested in sec . [ s : ilepp ] . consider now the full field equations , starting from ( [ eqh ] ) . while , by replacing in the l.h.s . the shock - wave ( [ separation ] ) , we generate terms proportional to @xmath380 , the rescattering term in the r.h.s . yields instead the structure @xmath381 which suggests an @xmath140 translation , i.e. , a shift similar to those just found at leading and h - diagram level with the eikonal insertions . therefore , we make the ansatz [ shifts ] @xmath382 \ ; , \label{phishift } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath383 are shift variables to be determined . we take a similar ansatz for energy - momentum too , because we know from last section the latter is really shifted at leading level . by then formally expanding the @xmath384-function ( [ hppshift ] ) in @xmath229 , we get two equations from the zeros of the @xmath384 and @xmath385 contributions . the first equation is simply the reduced - action model ( ram ) equation for @xmath22 , which reads @xmath386 + { { \textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}\delta^2({\boldsymbol{x } } ) = 0\ ] ] and reduces , in the axisymmetric case and for real - valued @xmath323 , to @xmath387 = \frac{{\mathrm{d}}}{{\mathrm{d}}r^2}\big[\dot a\rho ] = -\frac1{2\pi}\delta(r^2 ) \;.\ ] ] the latter is equivalent to eq . ( [ eomrho ] ) and yields the solution @xmath388 where we have introduced the infrared cutoff parameter @xmath70 by setting @xmath389 . since by eqs . ( [ regsol ] ) above @xcite @xmath390 @xmath327 approaches the leading value for @xmath391 @xmath392 and diverges logarithmically for @xmath393 . the second equation ( from the vanishing of the @xmath385-coefficient ) involves the rescattering terms and is supposed to determine the shift parameter @xmath252 , which occurs in the combination @xmath394 , as follows @xmath395 = -\frac{\delta_0}{2}\delta^2({\boldsymbol{x}})+(2\pi r)^2 |{\partial^{*2}}\phi|^2 \;,\ ] ] where we have set the rescattering terms on the r.h.s . and we notice in particular the energy - momentum shift which , according to sec . [ s : ssw ] , has the contribution @xmath396 emerging from the eikonal insertions up to @xmath0 accuracy . in the axisymmetric limit , ( [ eqd ] ) takes the simplified form @xmath397 where we note that the rescattering source @xmath398 vanishes for @xmath399 , as a consequence of the equations of motion ( [ rhoasy ] ) . it is then straightforward to find a solution for @xmath400 which is regular everywhere , in the form @xmath401 \displaystyle \delta_0 - \frac1{a(r^2)}\left[2\pi a(b ) \int_{b^2}^\infty { \mathrm{d}}r'{}^2\,{{j_\textsc{r}}}(r'{}^2 ) - \int_{b^2}^{l^2}\frac{{\mathrm{d}}r'{}^2}{\rho(r'{}^2 ) } \int_{r'{}^2}^\infty{\mathrm{d}}r''{}^2{{j_\textsc{r}}}(r''{}^2 ) \right ] & ( r^2\leq b^2 ) \end{cases}\ ] ] where @xmath402 in other words , the shift parameter of the longitudinal field takes over the ( constant ) leading value @xmath403 from the energy - momentum tensor and adds an @xmath335-dependent term of relative order @xmath0 which , for @xmath404 , is related to the kinetic term of the ram action @xmath405 \equiv 2\pi gs \ , { \mathcal{a}}(b ) \;.\ ] ] this means that , while the ram action is sufficient in order to describe the scattering parameters at relative order @xmath0 ( h diagram ) , the rescattering terms are needed in order to describe the form of the fields , like shock - wave shifts , and thus the metric properties at a comparable level of accuracy . it is amusing to check the result ( [ soldelta ] ) which is based on the rescattering equations and on the energy momentum shift in eq . ( [ eqd ] ) by using the direct insertions _ ( b ) _ and _ ( c ) _ on the h - diagram mentioned before , and depicted in fig . [ f : hdiagraminsertions ] . by keeping track of the flow of energy charges we calculate the above insertions on the imaginary parts ( app . [ a : hdi ] ) and we find that diagram _ ( b ) _ is already counted by lipatov s vertices , while diagram _ ( c ) _ contributes the absorptive part @xmath406 the @xmath216-dependent part , by dividing out the rapidity factor @xmath407 ( as requested in order to obtain the real part of the diagram from the dispersion relations ) and the leading field @xmath408 fits with the displacement form @xmath409 , by thus providing the shift @xmath410 from past to future , where @xmath411 we recognize here the 2-dimensional laplacian green function @xmath412 applied to the h - diagram density . by translating it to the azimuthal - averaged formalism we can use the one - dimensional form @xmath413 and apply it to the rescattering current @xmath398 . the result is just identical to the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ soldelta ] ) with the @xmath414 contribution subtracted out . in particular , for @xmath415 eq . ( [ deltahb ] ) factorizes and yields @xmath416 , thus recovering the form ( [ akin ] ) of the total shift . our overall interpretation of the present findings is that a large - distance observer will see the particle shock - waves to suffer a total time delay @xmath417 , directly related to the action and thus to the scattering angle @xmath418 because of the contribution of the rescattering shift . on the other hand , a test particle parallel to particle 2 , traveling at transverse distance @xmath419 from particle 1 at deflection time , corresponding to the perpendicular distance ( impact parameter ) @xmath420 , according to the discussion of sec . [ s : wpm ] . ] will see a profile function @xmath421 related to its own scattering angle @xmath422 which turns out to be the same in the limit @xmath423.-derivative of @xmath424 has implicit contributions which vanish by the equation of motion . ] furthermore , the test - particle will suffer a time delay that , due to the double - shift picture of sec . [ s : sdts ] , is @xmath425 , close to the short - distance value @xmath426 coming from the eikonal insertions of sec . [ s : ssw ] finally , while the rescattering contribution is needed for the large distance shifts , its contribution to the action starts at order @xmath310 because the diagram in fig . [ f : subldiagrams].c ( formally of order @xmath311 ) vanishes by the property @xmath427 . therefore it does not affect the consistency of the metric and action descriptions at order @xmath428 . was argued @xcite to vanish for light - particle scattering by analiticity and relativity arguments . ] of course , a symmetrical calculation yields the shift @xmath429 for the field @xmath199 , provided one exchanges light - cone indices @xmath430 and the profile functions and shifts @xmath431 , @xmath432 . we now go over to the second basic equation ( [ eqphi ] ) which essentially describes rescattering properties ( fig . [ f : subldiagrams].c , d ) of the transverse field @xmath21 , once emitted by the longitudinal fields . we note that , by replacing the ram fields ( [ shifts ] ) in the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ eqphi ] ) , we obtain the structure @xmath433 \times \label{eqphistr } \\ \nonumber & \left\ { -\frac{\partial}{\partial\delta}\frac12\big [ \delta(x^- -\pi r\delta)\delta(x^+ -\pi r\bar\delta_\phi ) + \delta(x^- + \pi r\delta)\delta(x^+ + \pi r\bar\delta_\phi)\big]\right\ } \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] let us recall that , according to eqs . ( [ delta0],[soldelta ] ) , the longitudinal rescattering predicts a shift @xmath434 . we then decide to expand the shift @xmath435 of the transverse field around the constant value @xmath436 , which gives the leading order of the longitudinal shift . by this method , it is easy to evaluate a ( formally ) first order modification @xmath437 of the transverse - field shift , which however is also of leading order in the @xmath188 expansion . by expanding the first term in the l.h.s . of eq . ( [ eqphi ] ) we obtain @xmath438 \times \nonumber\\ & \frac12\big [ \delta(x^- -\pi r\delta ) \delta(x^+ -\pi r\bar\delta ) + \delta(x^- + \pi r\delta)\delta(x^+ + \pi r\bar\delta ) \big]\label{expphi}\end{aligned}\ ] ] so that we can easily match the left and the r.h.s . to get the equation , in the axisymmetric limit , @xmath439 where we work in the regime @xmath440 with @xmath441 . the expression of @xmath323 is found by the ram equation @xmath442 which was provided before ( [ eomrho ] ) . by inserting proper boundary conditions , in our regime @xmath415 we can set @xmath443 ^ 2 $ ] and tentatively look for a solution @xmath444 , where @xmath445 and @xmath446 are constants . a simple calculation shows that @xmath447 + \frac1{2\pi } \;,\ ] ] so that @xmath435 is @xmath335-dependent and of leading order , while the correction @xmath448 is sizeable . furthermore , @xmath435 becomes cutoff independent , and pretty small at @xmath423 . the above conclusion may be unpalatable from a calculational standpoint , but is natural on physical grounds because rescattering occurs for the @xmath323 field at relatively leading level and at all distances , so that the parameter @xmath403 has no particular role and a sizeable difference @xmath449 is expected . one might ask , at this point , whether the ram hierarchy for the action is really satisfied or not . fortunately it remains , because the integral over @xmath207 , @xmath140 of the rescattering vertex with the longitudinal field just vanishes ( @xmath450 ) or , in other words , there is no @xmath451 contribution to the action from diagram [ f : subldiagrams].c . furthermore , the shift does not change the @xmath452 integration in the h - diagram and therefore rescattering contributions . on the other hand , the location of the shock - wave and the evolution of particle trajectories and geodesics does change from the point of view of the metric , so that rescattering is needed in order to have self - consistent calculations even at relative order @xmath0 . all preceding arguments hold for the uv - safe solutions of the ram model in eqs . ( [ eoma],[eomrho ] ) which , by definition satisfy the condition @xmath453 . due to the form of @xmath339 in eq . ( [ rho ] ) , @xmath454 would imply that @xmath455 has a short - distance singularity , @xmath456 has an outgoing flux @xmath457 and therefore @xmath458 has a singular @xmath384-function contribution . the latter behaviour would call for large short - distance effects possibly regularized by the string which are expected , but not considered , in the ram model . restricting the solutions by @xmath453 is possible only if the impact parameter is larger than some critical value @xmath6 which signals a possible classical collapse . in fact , the regular solution ( [ regsol ] ) of eq . ( [ eomrho ] ) has continuous derivative at @xmath459 provided @xmath460 a condition which has real - valued solutions only for @xmath461 . on the other hand , the complex solutions for @xmath8 lead to an exponential damping @xcite of the @xmath1-matrix of type @xmath462 with exponent of the order of a black - hole entropy @xmath463 which leads , eventually , to a violation of unitarity of the ram model @xcite . from the above discussion , some questions arise : what happens to the rescattering solutions for @xmath8 , when they are irregular ? do we see any sign of a possible collapse in the latter , perhaps in relation with the unitarity problem and to a `` fall in the center '' mechanism @xcite ? let us then consider a class of real - valued ram solutions with @xmath454 for @xmath8 , as follows . we start from the general solution for @xmath454 @xmath464 \theta(b^2-\tau)+r^2\cosh^2\chi(\tau)\theta(\tau - b^2)\ ] ] where @xmath465 is now a free parameter which @xmath466 depends on . then we choose @xmath467 so as to minimize @xmath468 , i.e. , @xmath469 . the parameters of this `` minimal '' solution @xmath470 are given by @xmath471 the corresponding rescattering current is @xmath472 the above current is now non - vanishing for @xmath473 , and , in addition , has a non - integrable behaviour for @xmath474 . this means that large rescattering amplitudes are built in the short - distance region @xmath475 and , as a consequence , that exchange and emission of ( massive ) string states can no longer be neglected . nevertheless , we find it instructive to provide here a preliminary analysis of irregular solutions in our effective - theory framework in which only graviton intermediate states are considered . basic string effects like graviton reggeization and ensuing string production at @xmath476 @xcite , as well as diffractive and central string emission induced by tidal forces @xcite - derivatives of phaseshifts @xcite and are thus possibly important in the whole subcritical region @xmath475 where ( [ irrjr ] ) is large , so that unitarity defect @xcite and energy balance @xcite could be sizeably affected . ] should certainly be estimated in the near future in order to see how they affect the picture , but we feel that our effective approach may still provide suggestions and questions to be answered , and is anyway needed as a ground for the estimates just mentioned . in order to get a better insight on the evolution of irregular solutions , we cut - off the current ( [ irrjr ] ) below @xmath477 , and we compute the total charge , related in sec . [ s : rcram ] to the h - diagram action @xmath478 and to the shift @xmath479 as follows : @xmath480\rho(0 ) + \frac{\rho^2(0)}{\lambda_s^2 } + { \mathcal{o}\left(\lambda_s^2\right)}\right ] \ ; , \label{ahirr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the singular integration has been performed by a careful integration by parts and in the last equality we have introduced the @xmath384-function singularity in the @xmath346-derivative : @xmath481 this means that we think of @xmath482 for @xmath483 ( a region which is felt by the two - dimensional model through the outgoing flux ) and that the @xmath384-function occurs because of the @xmath484-discontinuity . thus , strictly speaking , we discover that the singular solutions are not _ bona fide _ solutions of the equations of motion up to @xmath485 unless we introduce a singular `` external force '' @xmath486 at @xmath487 . we can do that by starting from the action @xcite @xmath488\ ] ] and by supplementing the lipatov s current @xmath325 of eq . ( [ defhc ] ) with a singular external current @xmath489 by then replacing such expression into eq . ( [ 2dimaction ] ) , i.e. , @xmath490\left ( 2\dot{a}\dot{\bar{a}}+\frac{\rho_m(0)\delta'(\tau)}{(\pi r)^2}\right ) \;,\ ] ] we find that the action enforces eq . ( [ irrdrho ] ) and becomes , on the equation of motion , @xmath491{\mathrm{d}}\tau-\frac12\int_{0^+}^\infty \left(\frac{1-\dot\rho}{\pi r}\right)^2{\mathrm{d}}\tau + \frac12\left(\frac{\rho_m(0)}{\pi r}\right)^2\delta(0 ) \right\ } \nonumber\\ & = a(b ) - \int_{0^+}^\infty \frac{(1-\dot\rho)^2}{2\pi r^2}\;{\mathrm{d}}\tau + \frac{\rho_m^2(0)}{2\pi r^2\lambda_s^2 } \ ; , \label{irract}\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus determining the singular term in the action . as a step - function located around @xmath487 with width @xmath492 and height @xmath493 , hence the identification @xmath494 . ] we are now able to look at the scattering and shift properties of the irregular solutions , by keeping in mind that we need in this case the external current ( [ deltahc ] ) , that we think generated by the short - distance string dynamics and/or by possibly collapsed matter . compared to the complex solutions which have a quantum - tunneling interpretation and cause a probability suppression the irregular ones may provide a probability source or alternatively may carry away the information loss . by thus using the eikonal representation of the @xmath1-matrix with the action ( [ irract ] ) and by carefully computing @xmath4- and @xmath71-derivatives , we get the scattering angle @xmath495 and the time delay @xmath496 \equiv 2\pi r\delta_0 \;,\ ] ] where , by eqs . ( [ irrsol],[deltahc ] ) @xmath497 \;.\ ] ] such results can be further specified by using @xmath498 and the outcomes are plotted in fig . [ f : irraction ] . without the @xmath468 contribution ; _ ( b ) _ scattering angle as derived by eq . ( [ irrtheta ] ) . in both plots @xmath499 ; lengths are measured in units of @xmath500._,title="fig : " ] without the @xmath468 contribution ; _ ( b ) _ scattering angle as derived by eq . ( [ irrtheta ] ) . in both plots @xmath499 ; lengths are measured in units of @xmath500._,title="fig : " ] [ f : irraction ] we note the strong increase of the action in the region @xmath501 due to the positive singular contribution implying in particular a motion with many turns in the region @xmath502 . actually , large scattering angles are reached pretty soon around @xmath503 as solutions of the equation @xmath504 \;,\ ] ] but , due to the strong increase of the action derivative ( fig . [ f : irraction ] ) , the saddle - points are confined to either the critical region @xmath505 or to the small-@xmath4 region @xmath506 , for all real values of @xmath507 . finite @xmath4-values , in the region @xmath508 are strongly suppressed like @xmath509 . the above observation suggests that the singular solutions under study do not actually yield back all the initial information in the physical scattering region , but may carry it away in the small-@xmath4 , string - dominated region . another piece of information comes from the study of the shifts and the corresponding time delay . we first notice , by eq . ( [ irrdelay ] ) , that the short - distance shift of @xmath510\frac{2\rho(b^2)}{2\pi r^2}\ ] ] has a positive singular term meaning a lot of time spent in the interaction region which is essentially twice the singular contribution to @xmath511 in eq . ( [ ahirr ] ) . the factor of 2 comes from @xmath468 scaling like @xmath512 similar to what happens for the h - diagram itself . furthermore , we already know from sec . [ s : rcram ] that the large - distance shift takes contributions from rescattering insertions and produces the additional ( negative ) shift @xmath479 , the one we started with in eq . ( [ deltah ] ) . we thus have @xmath513 we note that the singular term remains positive after subtraction of @xmath479 and of the same order as that of the action apart for the addition of a term proportional to @xmath514 . the very large time delay is thus confirmed at all distances . that means that the singular solutions , wherever they are , spend a long time in the interaction region , before exiting , either around @xmath503 , or at @xmath515 . therefore , they are connected with long - lived states in that region . finally , let us look at the associated metric ( [ metr ] ) , whose geodesics in the `` regular '' case @xmath453 were argued to provide a complementary picture of particle scattering . for the irregular solutions of eqs . ( [ irrsol],[minpar ] ) , the relevant metric coefficients ( inside the light - wedges @xmath516 ) have the form [ gmunu ] @xmath517 where the arrows label the simplified expressions obtained in the @xmath518 limit , which will be used for the purpose of the qualitative discussion below . we note that , for @xmath454 , @xmath519 shows a puzzling zero at @xmath520 , which causes a change of signature of the @xmath106-dimension for @xmath521 a feature to be taken with great caution because our perturbative identification of the metric coefficient is probably invalid in the strong - coupling region we are interested in . nevertheless , let us take the expressions ( [ gmunu ] ) at face - value , and discuss the ensuing geodetic flow , in the transverse plane , which is strongly affected by the @xmath323-field singularity @xmath522 . in order to do that , we shall introduce the test - particle lagrangian ( per unit mass ) @xmath523 with corresponding momenta and hamiltonian ( per unit mass ) [ momenta ] @xmath524 it is convenient to define the momenta per unit energy @xmath525 , so as to allow the treatment of the massless case too . by evaluating the constants of motion in the asymptotic region @xmath526 one finds that @xmath527 , @xmath528 and @xmath529 , where @xmath530 , @xmath531 and @xmath532 are the longitudinal , transverse and total ( asymptotic ) velocity , while @xmath533 is the impact parameter of the test particle w.r.t . the @xmath272 axis . the test - particle motion is eventually described by the constants of motion @xmath534 , @xmath535 , @xmath536 and by the radial `` effective potential '' @xmath537 \longrightarrow -\left(1-\frac{r^*{}^2}{r^2}\right ) v_\perp^2\left(1 -\frac{\beta^2}{r^2+r^*{}^2}\right ) \;,\end{aligned}\ ] ] since @xmath538 . ( solid blue ) , @xmath539 ( dashed red ) , @xmath540 ( dotted green ) , @xmath541 ( dash - dotted brown ) . _ ] [ f : potential ] the @xmath542 geodesics are characterized by the fact that the transverse velocity @xmath531 ( if present ) is purely radial and the potential ( [ potential ] ) is purely repulsive ( fig . [ f : potential ] ) , and would be typical of an angular momentum barrier with @xmath543 that by lack of other explanations we should attribute to the external source @xmath544 in eq . ( [ deltahc ] ) that we have put in at @xmath545 in order to justify the irregular solutions themselves . for @xmath546 the repulsive potential is absent , and the geodesics ( at @xmath547 , say ) will reach the shock - wave ( at @xmath548 , say ) at the initial distance @xmath106 , but will thereby acquire a shift and will be deflected according to the formula @xmath549 which takes into account the `` refraction index '' of the @xmath323-field . once again @xmath550 is unreachable : if initially we try to approach it , the geodesic scattering angle approaches @xmath551 , and the test particle is reflected backwards . we note at this point that the situation does change unexpectedly when @xmath552 increases and overcomes the threshold @xmath553 : in this case , according to eq . ( [ potential ] ) , the centrifugal factor at the origin changes sign , so that the potential becomes partly attractive , close to the origin and above @xmath553 ( fig . [ f : potential ] ) . in particular , for @xmath540 the potential is everywhere attractive ! this somewhat surprising feature opens up the possibility that test particles may reach the small-@xmath106 region , at least at quantum level , because the small barrier has a transmission coefficient of order unity around the value @xmath540 , and is thus able to populate the small-@xmath106 region around @xmath476 in an efficient way . that feature is the counterpart of the selection of possible issues of the particles themselves , which was argued before to have sizeable probability for a small-@xmath4 exit on the basis of the action stationarity condition . furthermore , the test - particle action variable @xmath554 develops a logarithmic behaviour in the small-@xmath106 region with frequency @xmath555 : is that perhaps a possible interpretation of the time nature of the variable @xmath106 in that region ? on the whole , we think , the above discussion shows at a sort of `` phenomenological '' level that the irregular solutions may indeed vehicle the particles information from distances of order @xmath11 down to the string size , thus suggesting that the unitarity loss of the @xmath453 model is due to the opening up of the gate to other worlds . however , due to the lack of the theoretical ingredients from string theory mentioned in the beginning , in the present formulation we have been unable to really assess the reliability of the above suggestion and to discuss the physical interpretation of the state(s ) , living at @xmath476 , which could be responsible for the singular contributions to the action investigated here and for their intriguing consequences . to sum up , in our study of the improved eikonal model with subleading correction we have found that : * the source particles , after the interaction , besides being deflected , suffer a time delay which can be interpreted as a shift in the light - cone variables ( sec . [ s : ilepp ] ) ; * the shock - wave metric fields @xmath556 generated by the source particles are also shifted in an analogous way , after the interaction described by the eikonal amplitude ( sec . [ s : ssw ] ) ; * the subleading contributions to the eikonal , represented by the ( multi ) h - diagram and by the rescattering terms , provide corrections to the scattering angle of the particles and to the shifts of the metric fields @xmath556 and @xmath296 ( sec.[s : rcram ] ) . due to rescattering , the large - distance shift of the particle fields agrees with the scattering - angle description based on the action . in order to find an adequate form for the self - consistent metric which embodies all these features , we have to modify the acv expression ( [ metr ] ) . as far as the shock waves are concerned , the improved expressions are obtained from eq . ( [ hppr ] ) by replacing the leading profile function @xmath373 with the full profile function @xmath134 derived in sec . [ s : hd ] and by accordingly shifting the location of the shock waves of the amount @xmath557 as explained in sec . [ s : rssf ] . in turn , the support @xmath558 of the transverse field @xmath296 is also shifted from the region @xmath516 to the two ( past and future ) disconnected regions @xmath559 where in the region @xmath560 after the interaction we have used the rotated coordinates of eq . ( [ rotation ] ) . equivalently , the characteristic function of @xmath561 reads @xmath562 the ensuing improved metric we propose is thus @xmath563 \nonumber \\ & + ( { \mathrm{d}}x^+)^2 \delta\big(x^{+}-\pi r { \epsilon}(x^-)\bar\delta({\boldsymbol{x}})\big ) \left [ 2\pi r \bar{a}({\boldsymbol{x } } ) -{{\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}}(1-\dot\rho ) |x^{-}-\pi r { \epsilon}(x^+)\delta({\boldsymbol{x}})| \right ] \nonumber \\ & + ( { \mathrm{d}}x^-)^2 \delta(x^{-}-\pi r { \epsilon}(x^+)\delta({\boldsymbol{x}})\big ) \left [ 2\pi r a({\boldsymbol{x } } ) -{{\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}}(1-\dot\rho ) |x^{+}-\pi r { \epsilon}(x^-)\bar\delta({\boldsymbol{x}})| \right ] \nonumber \\ & + { \mathrm{d}}r^2\left[1 + 2(\pi r)^2\chi({\sigma})\dot{\phi } \right ] + { \mathrm{d}}\theta^2\,r^2 \left[1 + 2(\pi r)^2\chi({\sigma})(\dot{\phi } + 2r^2\ddot{\phi})\right ] \;. \label{metrica}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it takes into account all the physics results following the analysis of the improved eikonal model and the acv effective action , and is self - consistent , in the sense that the trajectory shifts caused by the shock - wave metric are felt by the metric itself . of the metric field @xmath296 ( yellow ) . the ( pink ) rectangle @xmath564 actually corresponds to two different regions of space - time , which are accessed either from the left or from the right . _ ] [ f : wedgeslice ] a word of caution has to be spent concerning the form of the metric in eq . ( [ metrica ] ) in the region between the forward and past light - wedges . in fact , the set @xmath565 , @xmath566 enclosed by the continuation of the shock waves represented by a rectangle @xmath564 for each longitudinal section at fixed @xmath142 as depicted in fig . [ f : wedgeslice ] actually represents two distinct physical regions in our coordinate system . each region is unambiguously described by continuing the metric either from the left or from the right . for instance , by continuing the metric from the left across the boundary @xmath567 , we enter the region at the left of both shocks , where shock 1 travels from @xmath44 to @xmath568 , collides with shock 2 in @xmath568 , and after that shock 2 moves from @xmath568 to @xmath536 and goes on in the @xmath140 direction , as shown . on the other hand , either continuation leads to the same form of the metric inside the future light - wedge @xmath560 . we have also investigated here the scattering features of uv - sensitive solutions of the model in the subcritical range @xmath569 , without making a real attempt to restore the string degrees of freedom which are nevertheless called for by the singular short - distance behaviour of the rescattering current . this preliminary analysis leads to the suggestion that such solutions may indeed carry the information from distances of order @xmath11 to distances of order @xmath476 , but a dynamical analysis in the string - dominated region is needed to find out about their fate . it is a pleasure to thank gabriele veneziano for various exchanges on the topics presented here , and domenico seminara for useful discussions . we start noticing that the field - insertions we shall consider are basically either _ ( a ) _ external ( fig . [ f : hdiagraminsertions].a ) or _ ( b ) _ internal ( fig . [ f : hdiagraminsertions].b , c ) . here we shall concentrate on the final external insertion kinematics which in the frame characterized by initial particle s momenta @xmath570 and final momenta @xmath571 is able to provide the full shift @xmath572 from past to future . the field @xmath573 is coupled to the charge @xmath574 and thus the insertion factor in front of the amplitude @xmath575 is @xmath576 \left(q^- - \frac{{\boldsymbol{q}}^2-{\mathrm{i}}{\varepsilon}}{q^+}\right ) q^+ } \frac{{\mathrm{d}}^2{\boldsymbol{q}}}{(2\pi)^2 } { \mathrm{e}^{{\mathrm{i}}{\boldsymbol{q}}\cdot{\boldsymbol{x}}}}\ ] ] where @xmath577 and @xmath578 are both taken to the positive and larger than @xmath579 . the value of @xmath580 is fixed by the mass - shell and the @xmath581-integration is done in the lower half - plane because @xmath582 picking up the pole at @xmath583 . the result is @xmath584 { \mathrm{e}^{{\mathrm{i}}{\boldsymbol{q}}\cdot{\boldsymbol{x } } } } \label{htpp2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here we have kept for completeness the soft - emission contribution at @xmath585 also which is however suppressed by the phase factor exponent @xmath586 in the fast - emitting particle kinematics we are using . the dominant contribution , due to the @xmath587 pole , has a small phase factor @xmath588 , and thus it provides the @xmath276 result that we have anticipated in the text . limit the whole contribution ( [ htpp ] ) vanishes for @xmath589 , because the @xmath581-integrand has both poles in the same half - plane . ] note also that the @xmath204-translation in the @xmath590 denominator is due to the scattering angle implied by the @xmath591 momentum transfer , which in a single - hit process is small , @xmath592 and is thus negligible . on the other hand , in the full scattering process we have that @xmath593 is sizeable , and the shock - wave is correspondingly rotated , as in eqs . ( [ hr],[hppr ] ) of the text . therefore , for insertion on the eikonal lines in which @xmath594 and the amplitude factor is @xmath595 , we recover the insertion factor @xmath596 that we have repeatedly used in the text . here @xmath597 is the leading profile function of eq . ( [ a0 ] ) and the possible rotation along the scattered beams is understood . in the case of the h - diagram , besides the insertion _ ( a ) _ on external lines ( already computed in the text ) we have in principle two insertions , one of which is on the internal ( eikonal ) propagators . we think that this one ( fig . [ f : hdiagraminsertions].b ) is already included by the lipatov s vertices , which by definition count the external particles emissions also . therefore , in order to avoid double - counting we only estimate here the insertion on the rescattering graviton propagator of momentum @xmath598 in fig . [ f : hdiagraminsertions].c , as emitted by lipatov s vertices . by going through the same steps as before , we perform the @xmath581-integration first ( by keeping the leading @xmath587 contribution only ) and we have , in addition , a weighted @xmath600-integration , as follows : @xmath601 in the strong ordering region @xmath602 we estimate the effect of the ( small ) @xmath204-translation ( or @xmath591-dependent rotation ) by redefining @xmath603 and neglecting the translation in the matrix element @xmath604 . the integral in @xmath605 becomes @xmath606 by thus factorizing the exponential @xmath607 which modifies the subsequent @xmath578 and @xmath216 integrations . by performing the latter in the phase - space @xmath608 , we obtain in turn the factor @xmath609 \nonumber \\ & \simeq \log(\sqrt{s}b ) \;{\mathrm{i}}\partial_- \delta(x^- ) \times \left[1+{\mathcal{o}\left(\frac1{\sqrt{s}b}\right)}\right ] \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can see here the small shock - wave rotation @xmath610 which has been neglected in front of the logarithmic phase space . by then collecting the various factors we obtain the result @xmath611 \;,\ ] ] where we have defined @xmath612({\boldsymbol{x } } ) & \equiv \pi r^2 y\int{\mathrm{d}}^2 { \boldsymbol{x}}'\;|{\tilde{h}}({\boldsymbol{x}}')|^2 g_0({\boldsymbol{x}}-{\boldsymbol{x } } ' ) \stackrel{r\gg b}{\simeq } a_0(r)\cdot\im a_h(b ) \ ; , \\ \im a_h & = \frac{2y}{\pi}\re a_h \;. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] this shift of the imaginary part and the corresponding one for the real part add up to the total shift @xmath613 of both real and imaginary parts due to the external line insertion @xmath614 and thus occurs at large distances only with a relative minus sign , as emphasized in the text . 99 d. amati , m. ciafaloni and g. veneziano , `` superstring collisions at planckian energies , '' phys . b * 197 * ( 1987 ) 81 ; `` classical and quantum gravity effects from planckian energy superstring collisions , '' int . j. mod . phys . a * 3 * ( 1988 ) 1615 ; `` can space - time be probed below the string size ? , '' phys . b * 216 * ( 1989 ) 41 . d. j. gross and p. f. mende , `` the high - energy behavior of string scattering amplitudes , '' phys . b * 197 * ( 1987 ) 129 ; `` string theory beyond the planck scale , '' nucl . b * 303 * ( 1988 ) 407 . d. amati , m. ciafaloni and g. veneziano , `` higher order gravitational deflection and soft bremsstrahlung in planckian energy superstring collisions , '' nucl . b * 347 * ( 1990 ) 550 . d. amati , m. ciafaloni and g. veneziano , `` effective action and all order gravitational eikonal at planckian energies , '' nucl . b * 403 * , 707 ( 1993 ) . d. amati , m. ciafaloni and g. veneziano , `` towards an @xmath1-matrix description of gravitational collapse , '' jhep * 0802 * ( 2008 ) 049 [ arxiv:0712.1209 [ hep - th ] ] . m. ciafaloni and d. colferai , `` s - matrix and quantum tunneling in gravitational collapse , '' jhep * 0811 * ( 2008 ) 047 [ arxiv:0807.2117 [ hep - th ] ] . m. ciafaloni and d. colferai , `` quantum tunneling and unitarity features of an @xmath1-matrix for gravitational collapse , '' jhep * 0912 * ( 2009 ) 062 [ arxiv:0909.4523 [ hep - th ] ] . p. c. aichelburg and r. u. sexl , `` on the gravitational field of a massless particle , '' gen . rel . grav . * 2 * ( 1971 ) 303 . a. einstein , l. infeld and b. hoffmann , `` the gravitational equations and the problem of motion , '' annals math . * 39 * ( 1938 ) 65 . + a. einstein and l. infeld , `` the gravitational equations and the problem of motion . 2 . , '' annals math . * 41 * ( 1940 ) 455 . m. ciafaloni , d. colferai and g. falcioni , `` unitarity alternatives in the reduced - action model for gravitational collapse , '' jhep * 1109 * ( 2011 ) 044 [ arxiv:1106.5628 [ hep - th ] ] . g. t hooft , `` graviton dominance in ultrahigh - energy scattering , '' phys . b * 198 * ( 1987 ) 61 . d. amati , m. ciafaloni and g. veneziano , private communication . l. n. lipatov , `` high - energy scattering in qcd and in quantum gravity and two - dimensional field theories , '' nucl . phys . b * 365 * ( 1991 ) 614 . r. kirschner and l. szymanowski , `` effective action for high - energy scattering in gravity , '' phys . rev . d * 52 * ( 1995 ) 2333 [ arxiv : hep - th/9412087 ] . l. n. lipatov , `` multi - regge processes in gravitation , '' sov . jetp * 55 * ( 1982 ) 582 [ zh . * 82 * ( 1982 ) 991 ] . g. dappollonio , p. di vecchia , r. russo and g. veneziano , `` high - energy string - brane scattering : leading eikonal and beyond , '' jhep * 1011 * ( 2010 ) 100 [ arxiv:1008.4773 [ hep - th ] ] . s. b. giddings , d. j. gross and a. maharana , `` gravitational effects in ultrahigh - energy string scattering , '' phys . rev . d * 77 * ( 2008 ) 046001 [ arxiv:0705.1816 [ hep - th ] ] . v. s. rychkov , private communication . Abstract:
[ "starting from the acv approach to transplanckian scattering , we present a development of the reduced - action model in which the ( improved ) eikonal representation is able to describe particles motion at large scattering angle and , furthermore , uv - safe ( regular ) rescattering solutions are found and incorporated in the metric . the resulting particles shock - waves undergo calculable trajectory shifts and time delays during the scattering process which turns out to be consistently described by both action and metric , up to relative order @xmath0 in the gravitational radius over impact parameter expansion . some suggestions about the role and the ( re)scattering properties of irregular solutions not fully investigated here are also presented ." ]
14,761
14,761
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in general relativity , a black hole may be formed during the evolution from asymptotically flat initial data where none is present . consider a one - parameter family of regular asymptotically flat initial data . it is not difficult to find such families which form a black hole for some range of the parameter ( strong data ) but disperse for another range ( weak data ) . the boundary between the two regimes is the black hole threshold . in what is called type ii critical collapse , the black hole mass can be made arbitrarily small by adjusting the parameter @xmath0 of the initial data to its critical value @xmath1 . near the threshold , the final black hole mass @xmath2 then scales as @xmath3 where @xmath4 is a constant . @xmath4 depends on the family , but the transcendental number @xmath5 is universal it depends on the type of matter but not on the family of initial data . type ii critical collapse was originally discovered by choptuik in the spherically symmetric massless scalar field @xcite , but has since been found in many simple matter systems in spherical symmetry , and also in axisymmetric gravitational waves @xcite . a review of the field is @xcite . type ii critical phenomena can be described in dynamical systems terms : the phase space of the system has ( at least ) two attracting fixed points , namely black holes and dispersion . the boundary between the two basins of attraction , the critical surface , contains a critical point : it is an attractor within the boundary surface , and a repeller only in the one remaining direction . this means that it must have precisely one unstable linear perturbation , with the property that adding a bit of that perturbation with one sign leads to collapse , while adding it with the opposite sign leads to dispersion . in type ii critical collapse the critical point is either a discretely self - similar ( dss ) or a continuously self - similar ( css ) spacetime . type ii critical collapse is interesting , among other things , because the maximum value of the curvature in a subcritical evolution , and the maximal value of the curvature outside the black hole in a supercritical evolution , both diverge as @xmath6 as the fine - tuning is improved . ( this is basically the same result as the black hole mass scaling , and similar results hold for any curvature invariant . ) from the dynamical systems picture it is clear that the end point of type ii critical collapse in the limit of perfect tuning of @xmath0 to its critical value @xmath1 is not a `` zero mass black hole '' but the critical solution itself . this solution has a naked singularity . it is therefore interesting to examine the global spacetime structure of the critical solution , and in particular its cauchy horizon . here we do this for the spherically symmetric massless scalar field , where the critical solution is dss . we focus on this system because css can be viewed as a limiting case of dss , and because the critical solution in the most interesting system in which type ii critical phenomena have been found , axisymmetric pure gravity , is also dss @xcite . in section [ section : kinematics ] we discuss the global structure of choptuik s critical solution kinematically . section [ section : scalarfield ] sets out the field equations for the real massless scalar field in spherical symmetry , in coordinates adapted to our problem , and describes the mathematical structure of the solution at the cauchy horizon of the singularity . sections [ section : numerics ] , [ section : continuation ] and [ section : globalimages ] show the results of our numerical integration of the critical solution , and section [ section : conclusions ] contains our conclusions . some technical details have been removed to appendices . a spacetime is discretely self - similar ( dss ) if there is a conformal isometry @xmath7 of the spacetime such that @xmath8 the value of the dimensionless `` logarithmic scale period '' @xmath9 is a geometric property of the spacetime , independent of coordinates . it is often useful to work in coordinates adapted to the symmetry at hand . a generic self - similar and spherically symmetric metric can be written as @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the metric on the unit 2-sphere , and where @xmath12 , @xmath13 , @xmath4 and @xmath14 are functions of @xmath15 and @xmath16 . this metric is dss if and only if they are periodic in @xmath15 with period @xmath9 . it is continuously self - similar ( css ) if these functions are completely independent of @xmath15 . we assume that the signature is @xmath17 , and that the metric is non - degenerate . this leads to the inequality @xmath18 . we also assume @xmath19 for definiteness . any four - dimensional spacetime splits into a product of a two - dimensional spacetime ( the reduced manifold ) and a round two - sphere of area @xmath20 . the area radius @xmath21 is a scalar in the reduced manifold . here the coordinates on the reduced manifold are @xmath15 and @xmath16 , and the area radius is given by @xmath22 . geodesics in the reduced spacetime are radial ( constant @xmath23 and @xmath24 geodesics in the full spacetime ) . the hawking mass @xmath25 is defined by @xmath26 . it is a scalar on both the full and the reduced spacetime . from @xmath25 we define the two dimensionless scalars @xmath27 and @xmath28 . it is easy to show that a spherical surface where @xmath29 is a closed trapped surface , and one where @xmath30 is an apparent horizon . in a dss spherical spacetime , @xmath31 and @xmath32 are periodic in @xmath15 . radial null geodesics which are invariant under the symmetry ( [ dssgeometric ] ) are called self - similarity horizons ( ssh ) . they are the key to determining the causal structure . all coordinate systems of the form ( [ spherical_metric ] ) are related by coordinate transformations of the form @xmath33 where @xmath24 and @xmath34 are periodic in @xmath15 with period @xmath9 . we use this coordinate freedom to make all lines in the reduced manifold where @xmath35 into lines of constant @xmath16 . ( these can be either regular centers or central singularities . ) we also make all sshs into lines of constant @xmath16 where @xmath36 . in order to discuss the global structure of the choptuik spacetime and its possible continuations we briefly review the kinematical results of @xcite . in a spherically symmetric dss spacetime , two kinds of singularities can be distinguished . from dimensional analysis it can be seen that the kretschmann scalar scales as @xmath37 for constant @xmath16 , and therefore the set @xmath38 is a central ( because @xmath21 scales as @xmath39 ) curvature singularity . we call this the kinematical singularity . geometrically , this singularity is either a point or a null line in the reduced spacetime . there are two types of self - similarity horizons that in @xcite we have called fans and splashes . the kinematical singularity is null if there is at least one splash . additional central singularities can arise where @xmath35 for all @xmath15 . ( we call these dynamical . ) because @xmath15 takes all values up to @xmath40 they are connected to the kinematical singularity . there are at most two of them , connected to the kinematical singularity at its ends . topologically , they are lines in the reduced manifold . all known type ii critical solutions in spherical gravitational collapse can be defined by the properties of self - similarity ( css or dss ) , analyticity at the past lightcone , and the requirement that they have a single unstable perturbation mode . a generic spherically symmetric dss scalar field solution is singular either at the center or the past lightcone . imposing analyticity at both the center and the past lightcone defines a nonlinear pde boundary value - problem which admits at most discrete solutions @xcite . only one such solution has been found , and it empirically turns out to have only one unstable mode , and to agree perfectly with the critical solution found previously in collapse simulations by choptuik @xcite . the global structure of the choptuik solution up to the future light cone of the kinematical singularity ( which is a cauchy horizon ) is sketched in fig . [ figure : prech ] , together with the @xmath16 and @xmath15-lines of the three coordinate patches that we shall use in the numerical calculations . this structure is the same as for all other known type ii critical solutions in spherical symmetry . these solutions have a regular center @xmath41 in the past . as @xmath16 increases , the @xmath16 lines are at first timelike , so that @xmath42 . they become null at the fan @xmath43 where @xmath36 , @xmath44 and @xmath45 . as @xmath16 increases further , they are spacelike , so that @xmath46 spacelike . somewhere in the spacelike region @xmath13 changes sign . the @xmath16-lines become null again at the second fan @xmath47 , where @xmath36 , @xmath48 and @xmath49 . approaching the kinematical singularity @xmath38 from the range of `` angles '' @xmath50 it is a single point . @xmath51 and @xmath52 are its past and future lightcones . are shown dashed ( we have assumed @xmath53 while in reality @xmath54 ) . note that the numerical domain is @xmath55 ( shaded ) , with periodic boundary conditions . we have illustrated the three coordinate patches we use for numerical work : in the past patch between @xmath56 and @xmath51 @xmath15-lines are spacelike . in the outer patch between @xmath51 and @xmath52 @xmath15-lines are timelike . in the future patch beyond @xmath52 they are null . the three patches together cover the entire spacetime without overlapping , and the coordinates @xmath16 and @xmath15 are continuous at the interfaces.,width=264 ] we demonstrate below _ numerically _ that the curvature at the cauchy horizon @xmath47 is finite in choptuik s scalar field critical solution . furthermore all geodesics cross it in finite affine parameter . the spacetime can therefore be extended beyond , but this continuation is not unique . mathematically speaking we shall see that the solution is not analytic at the cauchy horizon in the limit coming from the past , and so there is no preferred analytic continuation to the future . ( the curvature is only @xmath57 from the past . ) the family of continuations in which the curvature is @xmath57 across the cauchy horizon and which are dss is parameterized by one free periodic function @xmath58 . physically speaking this function can be interpreted as data on the naked singularity which determine the continuation , in addition to the null data on the cauchy horizon . we now discuss the possible continuations that are allowed kinematically . and @xmath52.,height=302 ] in the simplest case , the @xmath16-lines to the future of the cauchy horizon are all timelike ( @xmath42 ) until a timelike singularity @xmath35 is reached . in our classification this is a dynamical singularity , while the kinematical singularity is a single point . this conformal structure is shown in fig . [ figure : timelikesingular ] . if @xmath59 , or equivalently @xmath60 as @xmath61 , the conformal structure is the same , but with the singularity replaced by a regular center . nolan @xcite has drawn spacetime diagrams for spherically symmetric css spacetimes in which the point singularity at the origin of the cauchy horizon is only the starting point of an ingoing central null singularity . in our classification this is an extended kinematical singularity , which requires the existence of at least one splash , that is a line where @xmath36 again . [ figure : spacelikesingular ] shows the simplest generic possibility , in which the splash is followed by a spacelike dynamical singularity , which covers part of the naked null singularity . this spacetime structure can actually be realized in spherical css scalar field solutions @xcite . the same , and more exotic structures , can also be realized in spherical css perfect fluid solutions @xcite . contrary to our expectations , we have found that none of these exotic possibilities are realized as spherical dss continuations of the choptuik solution . there is a unique dss continuation with a regular center , and all other dss continuations have a timelike singularity . in hindsight , the reason appears to be that the null data on the cauchy horizon are extremely weak . with stronger data ( not associated with the choptuik spacetime ) we find different kinds of continuations . and @xmath52 and a splash at @xmath62 . note that this extension is _ not _ realized as a dss continuation of the choptuik solution . , height=302 ] in spherical symmetry , there are four algebraically independent einstein equations , which can be taken to be @xmath63 , @xmath64 , @xmath65 and @xmath66 . the fourth of these is a combination of derivatives of the first three and can therefore be disregarded . the first three equations contain first and second derivatives of @xmath14 , but only first derivatives of @xmath12 , @xmath13 , and @xmath4 . in the following we assume that @xmath14 is a given function of @xmath16 and @xmath15 . the einstein equations then determine three independent linear combinations of the six first derivatives of @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath4 . a non - degenerate basis of this three - dimensional space is @xmath67 , @xmath68 and @xmath69 . ( with @xmath70 given , this last term contains only first derivatives of @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath4 . ) here we investigate massless real scalar field matter . the scalar field @xmath71 obeys the wave equation @xmath72 and the einstein equations can be written as @xmath73 the wave equation , when written as a second order pde , will in general contain both first derivatives of all four metric coefficients . however , by writing the wave equation in a geometrically defined first - order form , all metric derivatives except one can be eliminated . define two null derivative operators @xmath74 and @xmath75 with the usual convention that both point towards the future and that @xmath74 points inwards while @xmath75 points outwards . normalize them by imposing that @xmath76 and @xmath77 . we define the null derivatives of the scalar field as @xmath78 and @xmath79 . the massless wave equation in spherical symmetry can then be written as @xmath80 with the scalar @xmath81 . using the einstein equations , the curvature can be given in terms of @xmath82 and @xmath83 : @xmath84 ( other components of the ricci tensor vanish ) and @xmath85 the most general form of the scalar field compatible with dss is @xmath86 where @xmath87 and @xmath88 is a global constant . in the choptuik solution , @xmath89 empirically , so that @xmath71 is periodic in @xmath15 . this means that @xmath82 and @xmath83 have zero average in @xmath15 . moreover , @xmath82 and @xmath83 in the choptuik solution obey @xmath90 and so for @xmath83 . ( this of course implies zero average . ) as a consequence @xmath91 and so for other suitable metric fields . we shall assume these extra symmetries in our numerical work , but all our analytical expressions remain valid if these symmetries are dropped . we now describe three coordinate patches that cover the critical solution . we demand that both the past and the future lightcones of the singularity occur at lines of constant @xmath16 . this makes it easier to impose regularity at the center and past lightcone , and to investigate the behavior at the future lightcone ( cauchy horizon ) . it also allows us to match the coordinate patches without overlap . subject to these requirements , we have tried to make the field equations in each patch as simple as possible . based on the three patches , it is straightforward to construct a single smooth coordinate system covering the whole spacetime ( see section [ section : globalimages ] ) , but using it from the beginning would unnecessarily complicate our numerical work . we summarize a number of coordinate systems for spherically symmetric css and dss spacetimes , and their advantages and disadvantages , in the appendix . on the past patch , which extends from the regular center to the past lightcone , we write the metric in terms of two free functions @xmath92 and @xmath93 as @xmath94 for @xmath95 . here @xmath96 is the scalar we defined above . these coordinates can be derived from the schwarzschild - type metric @xmath97 through the coordinate change @xmath98 and @xmath99 , and defining @xmath100 . the remaining gauge freedom of time relabelling is fixed by imposing that the past lightcone is on a constant @xmath43 line . note that we do not follow the convention of @xcite that @xmath101 at the center , which in @xcite forced us to introduce an additional free function of time in the definition of @xmath16 . the einstein equations are @xmath102a^{-2}-1 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and the matter equations are @xmath103-{xu_{,\tau}}\over x(f+x ) } , \\ v_{,x}&=&{f[(1-a^2)v+u]+{xv_{,\tau}}\over x(f - x)},\end{aligned}\ ] ] at the regular center @xmath104 we impose elementary flatness , that is the absence of a conical singularity . in order to do this , we define @xmath105 and @xmath106 and impose that both are regular even functions of @xmath16 at @xmath104 . at the past lightcone we have @xmath107 , which by our gauge choice means that @xmath108 there . we also impose the physical regularity condition @xmath109 on the past lightcone . the conditions of dss , regularity at the center and regularity at the past lightcone select a solution . the equations on the past patch are form - invariant under the linear coordinate transformation @xmath110 , @xmath111 , and @xmath32 , @xmath82 and @xmath83 unchanged . in the numerical results presented here we have set @xmath112 on the past patch . note that the regularity condition ( [ past_patch_regularity ] ) is coordinate - independent , as @xmath82 , @xmath83 and @xmath32 and @xmath21 are all scalars and @xmath113 on the lightcone . on the outer patch , which extends from the past to the future lightcone , we write the metric in terms of @xmath93 , @xmath114 , and the auxiliary function @xmath115 as @xmath116 where @xmath117 is a function of @xmath15 only . @xmath118 is the scalar defined above . we fix the remaining gauge freedom by imposing that the past lightcone @xmath119 occurs at @xmath43 , and the future lightcone @xmath120 at @xmath47 . putting both lightcones on a line of constant @xmath16 requires @xmath115 to be non - constant . there is no outer coordinate patch that does not have at least one function like @xmath115 . as @xmath113 everywhere on the outer patch , @xmath15 is continuous between the past and outer patches . the metric equations are @xmath121\ , a^{-2}-1,\end{aligned}\ ] ] and the matter equations are @xmath122 note that the @xmath123 constraint equation is again linear in @xmath124 . the equations on the outer patch are form - invariant under the linear coordinate transformation @xmath125 , @xmath126 , and @xmath32 , @xmath127 , @xmath82 and @xmath83 unchanged . in the numerical results presented here we have set @xmath128 and @xmath129 on the outer patch . we shall see that at the cauchy horizon the solution is mildly singular . naive finite differencing breaks down there . instead we expand the generic solution around the cauchy horizon in terms of two free periodic functions @xmath130 and @xmath131 , and match this expansion to the numerical evolution at a small finite distance to the past of the cauchy horizon . before describing the full expansion , we focus on the origin of the singular behavior . equation ( [ outer_u ] ) becomes singular at the future lightcone because the denominator of the right hand side vanishes there . in contrast to the past lightcone , we do not have any freedom left to enforce the vanishing of the numerator as well . therefore we expect the solution to have some kind of singularity at @xmath52 . we rewrite ( [ outer_u ] ) @xmath132 where we have defined the metric function @xmath133 @xmath134 is positive on the outer patch and vanishes on the future light cone . the characteristics @xmath135 of eq . ( [ u_singular_eq ] ) are given by @xmath136 recall that we impose the gauge condition that the ch is at @xmath47 , or @xmath137 . we define the shorthand @xmath138 . we now make one fundamental assumption , namely that the spacetime admits regular null data on the cauchy horizon @xmath139 . this assumption is clearly necessary if we want to continue the spacetime through the ch , but here we make it simply because we have not been able to find a more general ansatz . we shall see later that it is sufficiently general to be matched to the critical solution that we have obtained numerically on the past patch . we therefore assume that @xmath83 is continuous , or @xmath140 by substituting this into eq . ( [ outer_a ] ) in the limit @xmath120 we find that @xmath32 is also continuous and @xmath141 obeys @xmath142 because we impose periodic boundary conditions in @xmath15 this ode has a unique solution . the physical significance of this is that the null data @xmath130 determine the geometry of the ch . similarly , from ( [ u_singular_eq ] ) in the limit @xmath143 we find that @xmath82 must be continuous , and @xmath144 is the unique periodic solution of @xmath145 this condition follows from the assumption of dss . finally , from ( [ ddef ] ) , ( [ outer_first ] ) and ( [ outer_second ] ) we find that @xmath134 is once differentiable , so that @xmath146 , and @xmath147 is given by @xmath148 at this point we introduce more shorthand notation . if @xmath149 is any periodic function ( with period @xmath9 ) , let @xmath150 be its average value , and let @xmath151 be its oscillatory part . let @xmath152 be the definite integral @xmath153 where @xmath154 is chosen so that @xmath152 has vanishing average . we can now integrate ( [ ucharacteristics ] ) for the @xmath82-characteristics to leading order and obtain @xmath155 we see that on a characteristic @xmath156 as @xmath157 . because @xmath158 is periodic in @xmath15 with period @xmath9 , an infinite number of oscillations in @xmath159 at constant @xmath15 pile up at the cauchy horizon @xmath139 . we can solve ( [ u_singular_eq ] ) to leading order by the method of characteristics . the general solution is @xmath160 where @xmath161 is an arbitrary periodic function with period @xmath9 and @xmath162 rewriting ( [ a0eqn ] ) as @xmath163 we see that @xmath164 , and so we can express @xmath165 and @xmath166 as @xmath167 our initial assumption that @xmath82 and @xmath83 are continuous at the light cone is therefore justified either if @xmath168 , so that @xmath169 , or if @xmath170 . we shall show numerically that @xmath165 is small but positive on the ch . in this case @xmath82 and @xmath83 are just @xmath57 , and the scalar field is therefore @xmath171 . in spherical symmetry the riemann tensor is determined completely by the ricci tensor , which in turn is quadratic in the partial derivatives of @xmath71 , see ( [ ricci ] ) . the curvature is therefore quadratic in @xmath82 and @xmath83 and so is @xmath57 . a similar analysis , with @xmath82 and @xmath83 interchanged , applies to the past lightcone . in the notation we have introduced here we can describe the past lightcone by saying that @xmath172 there ( because the null data @xmath173 on the past lightcone are large , @xmath174 ) but that the free coefficient @xmath175 vanishes identically ( because we have imposed analyticity as a boundary condition ) . we can not apply fuchsian techniques to our system of equations because they require the _ simultaneous _ vanishing on @xmath139 of the coefficients of @xmath176 and @xmath177 in equation ( [ u_singular_eq ] ) . however , the form ( [ uepsilon ] ) of the leading terms in @xmath82 suggests that the full non - linear solution can be written as a regular part , containing only integer powers of @xmath159 , plus a singular part which contains powers of @xmath178 . we can in fact construct a formal solution near the cauchy horizon in the form of an asymptotic double series : @xmath179 where @xmath180 stands for @xmath82 , @xmath83 , @xmath32 and @xmath127 , and @xmath181 here @xmath165 and @xmath182 are the quantities defined above in terms of @xmath130 . the expansion depends on the two free periodic functions @xmath183 and @xmath161 . by function counting we can therefore match any dss solution to this expansion . the first non - integer term appears in each variable at the following orders : @xmath184 in the previous section we obtained the coefficients of expansions ( [ expansion0][expansion3 ] ) up to @xmath185 . stopping there , the first order we neglect is @xmath186 . this truncation already depends on both free functions @xmath130 and @xmath131 and shows the singular behavior . it is also a sensible truncation numerically because @xmath165 turns out to be very small in the choptuik solution . going further , for the same reason there would be no point in including @xmath186 terms without also including all @xmath187 terms . it turns out that we need to go to @xmath188 . we have used the expansion to that order to check convergence . the expressions are given in appendix [ singular_expansion ] . our analysis of the possible continuations of the critical solution in section [ section : kinematics ] has shown that we can cover the entire future of the cauchy horizon in a single patch if we make @xmath15 an ingoing null coordinate . this means setting @xmath189 and @xmath49 . in order to put the center @xmath190 at a known coordinate location , we also set @xmath191 . we choose @xmath192 here so that @xmath16 increases as we extend the spacetime away from the cauchy horizon . we parameterize this metric in terms of the scalar @xmath32 and a coefficient @xmath180 ( not the same as @xmath180 in the past patch ) : @xmath193 regularity of the metric requires @xmath118 and @xmath194 . the field equations are @xmath195a^{-2}-1 , \\ u_{,x}&=&{f[(1-a^2)u+v]-xu_{,\tau}\over x(f+x ) } , \\ v_{,x}&=&{u+(1-a^2)v\over x}. \label{futureeq5}\end{aligned}\ ] ] at the cauchy horizon @xmath196 we impose the coordinate condition @xmath197 . the equations are invariant under @xmath110 , @xmath111 . we use this to set @xmath198 on this patch . as a consequence @xmath113 on the lightcone , and so @xmath15 is continuous between the outer and future patches . we find an asymptotic expansion around the cauchy horizon in terms of two free functions @xmath130 and @xmath131 . @xmath130 is given by the null data on the cauchy horizon , and so is the same as on the outer patch . @xmath165 is therefore the same on both sides . @xmath173 obeys the same ode , ( [ u0eqn ] ) , as on the outer patch , and so is the same function . there is no need , however , to make @xmath131 the same on both sides , as we would not gain any differentiability by doing so . instead we consider @xmath131 as free `` data on the naked singularity '' , and we shall find experimentally how the global structure of the spacetime is influenced by this choice . we have carried out a brand new numerical computation of the choptuik spacetime , improving the precision of our previous calculations @xcite by roughly four orders of magnitude . this was mainly needed to assert without doubt that @xmath165 is different from zero , even though it is extremely small . essentially , our new scheme uses shooting methods on the @xmath16 axis , instead of relaxation methods . this allows us to improve the treatment of the regular singular points of the equations ( the center and the lightcones ) by using taylor expansions . we still work with pseudo - spectral fourier techniques in @xmath15 because the solution is periodic . we shall see however that the particular structure of the fourier transform of the choptuik spacetime poses an unexpected problem when combining taylor and fourier expansions . in this section we explain the numerical scheme and present the results for the first two patches , with special emphasis on convergence properties and error analysis . for definiteness , let us suppose we work on the past patch . following @xcite we discretize our @xmath9-periodic fields @xmath199 , where @xmath200 stands for any of the set @xmath201 , using @xmath202 equidistant points in one period : @xmath203 for @xmath204 . in this way we transform our 1 + 1 pde problem for @xmath199 into an ode problem for the modes @xmath205 . the essential idea of pseudo - spectral methods is to carry out algebraic operations pointwise on the @xmath206 and @xmath15-differentiation / integration on the @xmath207 , switching from one to the other with a fast fourier transform algorithm . the main drawback of the method is the aliasing problem : pointwise products of fields ( nonlinearities ) generate high frequency modes which can not be sampled with only @xmath202 points . we partially solve that problem by doubling the @xmath207 ( padding with zeros ) before going to the @xmath206 , carrying out the necessary algebraic operations on the doubled @xmath206 and going back to the @xmath207 , then halving the @xmath207 and thus throwing away high frequency noise . we have tried other possibilities , such as padding with @xmath208 or @xmath209 instead of @xmath202 zero fourier components , or extrapolating the fourier coefficients using the observed fact that high frequency modes have a simple exponential dependence on frequency ( see below ) , but the results are not improved . aliasing can only be reduced by going to higher @xmath202 . from a numerical point of view , we are only safe from aliasing when the amplitude of the modes we are cutting off is below machine precision . because all our fields are real @xmath210 . furthermore , the metric fields @xmath32 and @xmath180 are even [ in the sense @xmath211 and therefore their fourier transform only contains even @xmath212 modes , while the matter fields @xmath82 and @xmath83 are odd [ in the sense @xmath90 ] and therefore their fourier transform only contains odd @xmath212 modes . taking this symmetry into account an even or odd field @xmath200 sampled with @xmath202 points per period is encoded by @xmath214 independent non - zero complex modes . as we have 4 independent variables @xmath215 , the ode system we solve comprises @xmath202 complex or @xmath216 real variables . in our calculations we have used @xmath217 and @xmath218 . previous investigations used @xmath219 . see appendix c of ref . @xcite for a complete discussion of our fourier pseudo - spectral method . we can not cross the lightcones during the integration of the ode in the @xmath16-axis because they are regular singular points of the equations . therefore we perform consecutive shooting calculations on the past , outer and future patches , in this order because we need information from the first to shoot the second and from the second to shoot the third . the issue of error propagation becomes very important . again , we describe the past patch for definiteness . given the equations ( [ pastmetriceqs][pastmattereqs ] ) and free data @xmath220 , @xmath221 at the center , we calculate the solution at @xmath222 slightly larger than @xmath56 using a second - order power expansion [ leaving errors of order @xmath223 . from these data we integrate the ode system forward in @xmath16 using finite differencing , up to @xmath224 . in the same way , given free data @xmath225 and the gauge condition @xmath226 , we calculate the solution at @xmath227 slightly smaller than @xmath51 [ this time with errors of order @xmath228 and integrate backward in @xmath16 up to the same @xmath229 . finally we use newton s method to look for the free data which brings the mismatch between both integrated solutions at @xmath229 down to a minimum , typically of order @xmath230 . ( this is the machine precision of @xmath231 reduced by a factor @xmath232 due to the calculations at each step and a factor @xmath233 from the ode - integration along @xmath234 points . ) we use a grid that becomes logarithmic near the regular singular points , with maximum stepsize @xmath235 at some intermediate position . that grid is constructed using the transformation @xmath236 from a grid of equidistant points in @xmath237 between the values @xmath238 and @xmath239 corresponding to @xmath222 and @xmath240 respectively . near the two endpoints we have @xmath241 and @xmath242 . we integrate on a fixed grid in @xmath16 rather than using a variable stepsize method in order to check for convergence with @xmath235 . this gives us a good estimate of the underlying discretization error . concerning the ode - integrator , we have tried several runge - kutta methods , both explicit and implicit ( gauss - legendre ) , with different convergence orders @xcite . in general , implicit methods are better suited to our problem than explicit methods , particularly for high @xmath202 , because high frequencies make the problem stiffer . we choose an irk2 method ( implicit , 2 stages , order 4 ) , which is a compromise between the accuracy of a high order method and the clarity of convergence of a low order method . our implicit schemes are implemented by iteration until @xmath243-differences between successive iterations converge below @xmath244 . we can not get closer to actual machine precision ( @xmath231 ) due to the accumulation of roundoff error . an implicit step typically takes 5 to 15 iterations to converge . the natural choice for the coordinate of the center is @xmath245 , but there is no preferred value for the past lightcone coordinate and we choose @xmath112 . with the set of parameters @xmath246 our newton s method converges to the free data plotted in fig . [ freedata ] ( see also table [ fouriertable ] ) , with a value @xmath247 which improves the precision of our previous result @xmath248 more than four orders of magnitude . the metric and matter fields integrated from those free data are given in fig . [ 3dinnerplots ] . best free data on the singular points : @xmath249 ( continuous line ) , @xmath250 ( dotted line ) and @xmath251 ( dash - dot line ) . ] [ cols="^,<,<,<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] finally , it is interesting to see that going to @xmath188 is not essential for obtaining an accurate result . table [ eps_conv ] compares the results for @xmath165 using a zeroth - order expansion ( that is , we only include the terms of orders @xmath252 and @xmath178 ) with those from the first order expansion ( which also includes orders @xmath159 and @xmath253 ) . it is clear that they both converge to the same number , even though with very different rates of convergence . we can not continue the solution as flat empty minkowski spacetime after the cauchy horizon because we have a small amount of ingoing radiation there , given by @xmath254 . the simplest continuation to look for is one with a regular timelike center , so that the conformal diagram is the same as for minkowski spacetime . in this case both @xmath82 and @xmath83 are small on the entire future patch , and we can obtain an approximate solution in perturbation theory around minkowski space , using the magnitude @xmath255 of @xmath256 as the small parameter . to leading order in @xmath165 we obtain the dalembert solution on flat spacetime : @xmath257 + o(\epsilon^{3/2 } ) , \label{upert } \\ v & = & \epsilon^{1/2 } \left[-g'(\tau ) + ( 1+x)\frac{f(\hat\tau)+g(\tau)}{x } \right ] + o(\epsilon^{3/2 } ) , \label{vpert}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath258 . in order to match the null data on the cauchy horizon @xmath259 , we need @xmath260 . recall that @xmath254 is given numerically by ( [ v_f_numerical ] ) . if we want to have a regular solution at the center we need @xmath261 . the solution is then completely determined , and it is clear that a nonlinear solution exists of which this is the leading order , and which can be found numerically . because the null data @xmath256 on the cauchy horizon are dss , it appears highly unlikely that there is another continuation with a regular timelike center that is not dss . we have obtained the ( probably ) unique regular continuation by shooting from expansions around the cauchy horizon and a regular center . the free data for the shooting algorithm ( given by @xmath262 at the ch and @xmath180 , @xmath176 at the center ) were obtained from the flat spacetime approximation . in this case we use an irk1 integrator and @xmath263 with very good convergence , that we do not show again . the fields @xmath32 , @xmath180 , @xmath82 and @xmath83 are shown in fig . [ choptuon_future ] . we now consider the other possible continuations , in particular those of figs . [ figure : timelikesingular ] and [ figure : spacelikesingular ] . before performing a numerical search of the possibilities in the @xmath131 space , we study the equations of motion in the future patch . we proceed in four steps : [ [ a - necessary - condition - for - another - ssh - is - a22 . ] ] a necessary condition for another ssh is @xmath264 . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in order to obtain fig . [ figure : spacelikesingular ] , or any even more exotic continuation , we must have a self - similarity horizon before the central singularity occurs at @xmath265 . a self - similarity horizon is a dss line @xmath266 ( periodic ) where @xmath36 . the only factor in @xmath267 that can vanish ( while the metric is regular ) is @xmath268 . we have @xmath269 and so @xmath270 at the cauchy horizon @xmath197 and @xmath271 because @xmath272 is small , and so @xmath273 and @xmath42 at least to the immediate future of the cauchy horizon . if there are more self - similarity horizons to the future of the cauchy horizon , we must have @xmath197 again there , and therefore @xmath274 in some intermediate region . @xmath275 must increase from @xmath276 to @xmath264 in order to achieve this . [ [ once - a21-for - any - tau - a2to-0-for - that - tau . ] ] once @xmath277 for any @xmath15 , @xmath278 for that @xmath15 . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + @xmath32 is given by the constraint ( [ a_constraint ] ) which reduces at the cauchy horizon to @xmath279 and this means that @xmath280 there . now @xmath32 obeys the evolution equation @xmath281 recall that in the future patch @xmath192 and increases towards the future . therefore @xmath282 is a repeller in the absence of matter , but any outgoing radiation @xmath82 drives @xmath32 to smaller values . hence , once @xmath32 becomes smaller than 1 for some value of @xmath15 , it will afterwards decrease to 0 for that @xmath15 whatever happens . because @xmath283 , this means that we are in a negative mass regime and remain there until we reach the central singularity @xmath104 , which is therefore timelike and has negative infinite mass at least for this @xmath15 . the singularity can not be reached with a finite value of @xmath284 . [ [ is - a21-at - the - singularity - possible - at - least - for - some - values - of - tau ] ] is @xmath285 at the singularity possible at least for some values of @xmath15 ? + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + if we choose @xmath131 much larger than @xmath286 , the @xmath287 term will drive @xmath32 to @xmath288 almost immediately . however , we know that the regular solution does not have negative mass and therefore it seems plausible that functions @xmath289 close to the regular case could generate a singularity with positive mass . we shall now argue that this is not true . @xmath32 can only increase from its ch value if @xmath290 is very small . in order to explore this regime we return to the approximation of perturbing around minkowski spacetime , but now dropping the assumption that @xmath261 . the result can be summarized as : @xmath291 ^ 2 \\ & + & \epsilon \ ; o(x^{-1 } ) + o(\epsilon^{3/2 } ) . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the function @xmath292 is positive and always smaller than 2 , and is independent of @xmath14 . all singular terms vanish for @xmath293 . for every other @xmath14 , the function @xmath32 becomes smaller than 1 , which corresponds to negative mass , as the center @xmath104 is approached . this is due to the divergent terms @xmath294 in ( [ upert ] ) and ( [ vpert ] ) . the crucial point is that @xmath275 is integrated from @xmath295 and therefore the term in the perturbation expansion that makes the mass nonzero has coefficient @xmath296 , and so the mass can not be positive . the negative mass regime is reached while perturbation theory still applies , and we have seen that afterwards the mass must decrease indefinitely . with these arguments we have ruled out the possibility of having positive mass at the singularity for very large @xmath131 and for very small ( in particular , close to the regular case ) @xmath131 . however we could be missing some intermediate regime where perturbation theory does not apply . for these intermediate cases we observe that the minimum of @xmath32 is far from 1 ( and therefore we can not apply perturbation theory ) , but its maximum is positive and close to 1 , and only becomes negative in the vicinity of the singularity . there could be solutions where @xmath32 is positive at the singularity for some values of @xmath15 . numerically , however , we do not find that . we have performed a large number of numerical evolutions in this intermediate regime starting from @xmath297 , for @xmath298 and @xmath299 . even though it is difficult to evolve the system near the singularity , we always observe a final decay of @xmath32 to 0 . see fig . [ negativemass ] . therefore we believe that , starting from small null data @xmath256 at the ch it is not possible to form another ssh . therefore , either we have a regular center or a timelike singularity , and this singularity always has negative mass . in the approach to the center with @xmath300 we always have @xmath301 with both @xmath302 finite . it should be stressed that this scenario is a consequence of the small amplitude of the null data @xmath256 on the cauchy horizon in the choptuik solution . we have performed other evolutions starting from large null data on the cauchy horizon ( not @xmath256 of the choptuik solution ) where @xmath275 increases beyond 2 . maximum and minimum of @xmath32 for different initial data functions @xmath131 from numerical evolutions of the nonlinear equations . note that the @xmath16 axis becomes logarithmic when approaching the boundaries , while the @xmath32 axis is linear between the dotted lines at @xmath303 , @xmath304 , and logarithmic elsewhere . the initial @xmath131 have been obtained multiplying the regular data ( black ) by different constants : 0 ( red ) , -1 ( blue ) and 5 ( green ) . clearly , the larger @xmath131 is , the sooner @xmath32 decays . ] [ [ how - is - the - singularity - approached ] ] how is the singularity approached ? + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we find that in all numerical continuations @xmath305 , @xmath306 , @xmath82 and @xmath83 tend to finite values and @xmath307 as the singularity @xmath104 is approached . if we assume that @xmath305 and @xmath308 as @xmath309 then the @xmath310 and @xmath311 equations to leading order give @xmath312 making the ansatz that @xmath313 we find from the @xmath176 and @xmath314 equations to the leading order , @xmath315 that @xmath316 ( the expansion also holds in the special case @xmath101 . ) the next order , @xmath317 , gives @xmath318 the metric in the future patch contains a residual gauge freedom worth one periodic function of @xmath15 . near the singularity @xmath104 , we can fix this gauge freedom by setting @xmath319 to an arbitrary value . ( in our numerical evolutions starting at the cauchy horizon , the gauge has of course been fixed already by setting @xmath320 at the cauchy horizon . ) @xmath144 and @xmath321 are then physical free data which determine @xmath141 and all other coefficients of the expansion . ( [ constraint ] ) can be solved for @xmath322 only if the right - hand side has vanishing average , which means that @xmath323 can not be set completely freely . ) this expansion is therefore generic in the sense of depending on two free functions after the gauge has been fixed . the behavior just described is what we observe numerically for large values of the free data @xmath324 at the cauchy horizon . for small values of @xmath324 we find @xmath325 , that is @xmath326 . note that by our ansatz of exact dss with @xmath89 , @xmath82 must be an odd function of @xmath15 with zero average . we observe in fact that @xmath158 goes to a fundamental frequency square wave of amplitude @xmath327 , that is , in half of each @xmath15-period @xmath328 , and @xmath329 in the other half . this is shown in fig . [ choptuon_singular ] . as the center @xmath104 is approached with @xmath330 , we observe empirically that the @xmath15-derivatives become dynamically negligible . this means that different values of @xmath15 effectively decouple , that at each point @xmath15 the evolution equations become an ode system in @xmath16 , while the constraint becomes algebraic , and that the spacetime becomes locally css . it also means that the evolution equations become `` velocity - dominated '' in the sense that all derivatives transversal to the singularity ( here in spherical symmetry , this is only the @xmath15-derivative ) become dynamically irrelevant compared to the one derivative running into the singularity ( here , the @xmath16-derivative ) . it is known that generic spacelike singularities in general relativity with massless scalar field matter are velocity - dominated @xcite . here we find this to be the case only in the limit of small data @xmath324 . as this class of continuations seems to be locally css near the singularity , it is interesting to study the exactly css solutions from the point of view of a dss ansatz . starting from a generic dss scalar field ( [ generalphi ] ) we introduce a new ( gauge - dependent ) variable @xmath331 which coincides with @xmath332 at the future lightcone @xmath333 , and obeys the equation @xmath334 in exactly css solutions of the system the metric functions and @xmath302 are independent of @xmath15 , and hence @xmath335 is constant with value @xmath336 . the css solution with @xmath89 was found in closed form by roberts @xcite and is described in appendix [ appendix : roberts ] . the css solutions with @xmath337 were studied numerically by brady @xcite . we find that the small @xmath324 continuations locally approach a roberts solution ( with @xmath89 ) with a value of the parameter @xmath0 of the roberts solution that depends on @xmath15 , and not , as one might have expected , one of brady s solutions . this is discussed in appendix [ appendix : roberts ] . figures [ 3dinnerplots ] , [ choptuon_outer ] , [ choptuon_future ] and [ choptuon_singular ] show in a very detailed way the structure of the choptuik spacetime . however it is difficult to get from them an idea of what it looks like globally . in this final section before the conclusions we present a number of additional figures that will fill this gap . we do it in two very different ways . as shown in fig . [ figure : prech ] , our three @xmath338 patches match continuously , but we do not expect the resulting global coordinate system to be differentiable at the interfaces between the patches . the critical spacetime itself , however , is differentiable ( analytic at the past lightcone and @xmath171 at the ch ) , and it must be possible to construct global coordinate systems which are at least @xmath339 . one simple possibility is synchronous slicing plus area gauge : @xmath340 we add the gauge condition @xmath341 on the past lightcone of the singularity . the coordinate transformation @xmath342 can be easily integrated and it is shown on the left panel of fig . [ coordinates ] for a single @xmath9-period in @xmath15 . another simple possibility is double null coordinates : @xmath343 with gauge condition @xmath344 at the center , where @xmath345 is the time coordinate constructed in the previous paragraph . the coordinate change @xmath346 is shown on the right panel of fig . [ coordinates ] for a single @xmath9-period in @xmath15 . the fields @xmath32 , @xmath82 and @xmath83 in double null coordinates are shown in fig . [ fieldsuv ] . as these fields are spacetime scalars , they should be analytic in these coordinates at the past lightcone , and @xmath171 at the cauchy horizon . in the plot it looks as if they are only @xmath57 at the cauchy horizon , but that is due to a lack of resolution in the plot : the slopes on the two sides of the cauchy horizon are dominated by @xmath347 and @xmath348 , which are discontinuous at the resolution of the plot , but close enough to the cauchy horizon , the slope becomes @xmath349 , which is continuous . we shall now consider the spherical dss scalar field as an infinite - dimensional dynamical system where @xmath16 is the `` time '' coordinate . the dynamical variables in this system are @xmath350 , @xmath351 and @xmath149 ( or @xmath352 in the outer patch ) . the variable @xmath353 is not independent , but given by a constraint . however , many solutions of the dynamical system correspond to the same spacetime , namely all that are related by the coordinate transformations ( [ dssgaugefreedom ] ) . the pair of periodic functions @xmath350 and @xmath351 describes a closed , possibly self - intersecting curve in the @xmath354 plane . an entire evolution in @xmath16 gives a surface that is topologically a cylinder , which we may call a phase portrait of the solution . clearly the surface itself is invariant under the coordinate change @xmath355 . if we consider @xmath15 as our `` space '' coordinate in the usual `` 3 + 1 '' split , then by looking at the phase portrait we have eliminated the `` spatial '' gauge freedom . the `` slicing '' freedom @xmath356 however does change the shape of the phase portrait , so it is not completely gauge - invariant . the choptuik spacetime up to the ch is given in fig . [ dynbefore ] and its regular continuation is shown in fig . [ dynafter ] . phase - portrait of the regular continuation of the choptuik spacetime from the ch at @xmath198 to the regular center at @xmath357 . again , from @xmath259 to @xmath358 we have distorted the axis to show the infinite number of oscillations that pile up there . from @xmath358 to @xmath359 we use a logarithmic axis and from this middle point to @xmath360 we use a different logarithmic axis . ] imposing css means that the system is independent of @xmath15 and hence the phase - portrait in @xmath361 reduces to a line that can be easily projected on the @xmath354 plane . then the whole evolution of the system can be described by this curve in the @xmath354 plane , which is now completely gauge - invariant . this is essentially what brady has done @xcite . in order to understand the singular continuations of the critical spacetime , we first look at phase portraits of the roberts spacetime . fig . [ roberts ] shows the phase - lines of the roberts solution for several values of @xmath0 in both branches ( see also appendix [ appendix : roberts ] ) . we see that the shape of the curves become constant for very small values of @xmath0 , but just translated along the @xmath362-axis . on the other hand fig . [ dynsingular ] gives the phase - portrait two of our singular evolutions , for small and large initial @xmath131 , respectively . in both cases as @xmath301 squeezes the phase cylinder into the diagonal , following a roberts solution in the former case , and not doing so in the latter . this figure demonstrates why it is not possible to obtain @xmath363 in the continuations of the choptuik solution . the roberts spacetime with @xmath364 does have @xmath363 on the singularity , @xmath365 ( minkowski ) has @xmath366 , and all other @xmath0 have @xmath278 . the @xmath364 roberts solution has the phase line @xmath367 line . to reach @xmath363 approach a solution must approach this line from the very beginning , because it is unstable . this requires @xmath83 of order @xmath327 at least and on the cauchy horizon we only have @xmath83 of order @xmath368 . phase - lines of the roberts spacetime . the colors encode different values of @xmath0 , for both branches : 1 ( red ) , 0.99 ( orange ) , 0.9 ( yellow ) , 0.5 ( light green ) , 0.1 ( dark green ) , 0.01 ( light blue ) , 0.001 ( dark blue ) and 0.0001 ( purple ) . the future ( past ) branch of the singularity is denoted with thick ( thin ) lines starting with @xmath369 ( @xmath370 ) . note that the vertical lines @xmath367 corresponding to @xmath364 are unstable . note also that the smaller @xmath0 is , the longer the curves stay close to the unstable flat line @xmath371 . ] phase - portrait of two singular continuation of the choptuik spacetime ( upper : initial @xmath289 of order @xmath368 ; lower : initial @xmath131 of order @xmath232 ) , together with a few roberts solutions for @xmath372 . the @xmath373 solution almost coincide with the external envelope of the upper phase - portrait and sets a maximum for the values that are realized in this solution . the lower phase - portrait is shown only for @xmath374 . for @xmath375 it is essentially on the diagonal in the @xmath354 plane although the amplitude of the oscillations is not the same as in the roberts solution . note that for small @xmath16 this phase portrait has been truncated also in @xmath82 , because @xmath82 becomes large . for @xmath376 the phase portrait is essentially on the @xmath82-axis . ] in a companion paper @xcite we investigate the constraints that the kinematic assumptions of spherical symmetry and discrete self - similarity impose on the causal structure . the key elements of our analysis were the self - similarity horizons radial null geodesics that are mapped onto themselves by the self - similarity . these come in two types : a `` fan '' connects a point singularity to a piece of null infinity , while a `` splash '' connects a piece of null singularity to a point at null infinity . all spherically symmetric and self - similar spacetimes can be enumerated in terms of a sequence of fans and splashes . we found that the singularity is central and consists of a middle segment which is either a point or null line , flanked by two segments which can be timelike , spacelike , or null lines , or which can be absent . there are never two or more disconnected singularities . in this paper , we have focussed on scalar field matter and in particular choptuik s critical solution in gravitational collapse . this solution is found as an intermediate attractor in the evolution of regular asymptotically flat scalar field initial data near the black hole threshold @xcite . independently , it can be constructed as the solution of a nonlinear pde boundary value problem from the assumptions of spherical symmetry , discrete self - similarity , and analyticity at the past center and past lightcone of the singularity @xcite . it can then be uniquely continued up to the future lightcone ( cauchy horizon ) of the singularity . @xcite found that the scalar field oscillates roughly as @xmath377 as the cauchy horizon @xmath139 is approached . it was suggested on theoretical grounds that these oscillations are damped by a factor @xmath178 with @xmath169 , but the numerical value of @xmath165 was too small to distinguish it from zero numerically . we have repeated the numerical calculations of ref . @xcite from scratch and have increased the accuracy by more than four orders of magnitude . we have found the positive value for @xmath165 given in eq . ( [ epsilon_value ] ) . therefore the scalar field is continuous on the cauchy horizon , with null data given in eq . ( [ v_f_numerical ] ) . the structure of the fields near the cauchy horizon is quite complicated , and has been discussed in subsections [ section : singularch ] and [ section : expansion ] . all possible dss continuations beyond the cauchy horizon are determined by the ( fixed ) null data on the cauchy horizon , and one ( arbitrary ) periodic function @xmath161 that can be thought of as data emerging from the naked singularity . ( in the absence of the naked singularity , null data on the cauchy horizon would alone determine the continuation . ) there is a unique dss continuation that has a regular timelike center except for a naked point singularity . for all other values of the arbitrary function @xmath161 , the continuation has a timelike central singularity with infinite negative mass . in particular , neither fig . [ figure : spacelikesingular ] , nor the even more exotic spacetime diagrams found in self - similar perfect fluid solutions @xcite can arise as continuations of the choptuik solution ( although they can probably arise in other dss scalar field solutions ) . the global structure of the choptuik solution is of interest partly because of the connection between critical collapse and cosmic censorship . choptuik s work has established that ( assuming the validity of general relativity at arbitrarily high curvatures ) a naked singularity can be formed in the spherical einstein - scalar field system from generic regular and asymptotically flat initial data by fine - tuning any one parameter to the black hole threshold . solutions with a naked singularity therefore form a subset of codimension one ( the black hole threshold in the space of initial data ) in all solutions arising from regular data . the choptuik spacetime is an attractor on the critical surface and therefore , assuming that it is actually a global attractor on the surface , we can conclude that every naked singularity will have , at least in a neighborhood of the singularity , the structure of the choptuik spacetime . we can now summarize this structure as follows : the curvature at the cauchy horizon of the singularity is finite but not differentiable , with an infinite number of damped oscillations piling up as the cauchy horizon is approached . the continuation of the spacetime beyond the cauchy horizon is not unique , but we have shown that if it is dss then the naked singularity is either a single point or timelike with infinite negative mass . the spacetime near the timelike singularity is locally css and velocity - dominated . the question remains whether this structure is stable against perturbations which break self - similarity and/or spherical symmetry . because the background is spherically symmetric and periodic in @xmath15 , all such perturbations are of the form @xmath378 , where @xmath379 is periodic , times a suitable scalar , vector or tensor spherical harmonic . we have shown in the past @xcite that all but one of these modes decay , with @xmath380 . ( the one growing mode determines the critical exponent for the black hole mass . ) the functions @xmath379 were calculated explicitly only between the regular center and past lightcone , but as they are by construction analytic at the past lightcone , they can be analytically continued up to the cauchy horizon , with the same @xmath381 . what needs to be done is to check that the functions @xmath379 remain bounded as @xmath16 approaches the cauchy horizon . we expect that this is true . nolan and waters @xcite have investigated a massless minimally coupled , non - spherically symmetric scalar field propagating on a class of spherically symmetric css spacetimes , and find that its gradient remains finite at the cauchy horizon . the structure of the full perturbation equations is similar . as the functions @xmath379 can not be analytic at the cauchy horizon ( because the background is not ) , the spectrum of @xmath381 need not be the same in the continuation beyond the cauchy horizon , and is likely to depend on the choice of continuation . we have finally given , for the first time , a number of global images of the choptuik spacetime , trying to minimize the gauge content of the pictures . we would like to thank james vickers for helpful discussions . this research was supported by epsrc grant gr / n10172/01 . in this appendix we review a variety of coordinate systems defined by giving @xmath14 as a function of @xmath15 and @xmath16 . this class covers the coordinate systems used in refs . @xcite , but does not include the lagrangian fluid coordinates used in @xcite . we classify the gauges within this class in three stages . 1 ) we fix @xmath70 . 2 ) we impose an algebraic relation between @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath4 . 3 ) we parameterize @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath4 in terms of two functions , say @xmath32 and @xmath180 . ( it will turn out to be useful to always use the scalar @xmath32 defined above as one of the two parameters . ) in a dss spacetime , the unknowns are periodic in @xmath15 . we therefore solve the einstein equations by `` evolving '' in @xmath16 , with periodic boundary conditions in @xmath15 . when we use the einstein equations to eliminate the metric derivative @xmath382 , @xmath82 and @xmath83 obey a pair of transport equation of the form @xmath383 where the dots stand for a known function of @xmath82 , @xmath83 , @xmath32 and @xmath180 but not their derivatives . by a suitable parameterization of @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath4 in terms of @xmath32 and @xmath180 , the einstein equations can always be brought into the form of two odes in @xmath16 , which for our purposes are evolution equations , and one ode in @xmath15 , which for our purposes is a constraint : @xmath384 this last equation can be made linear in @xmath124 ( that is , in @xmath31 ) by a suitable choice of @xmath180 , at least in all three coordinate systems we use . this inhomogeneous linear equation can then be solved uniquely for @xmath32 in terms of @xmath82 , @xmath83 and @xmath180 , using the fact that @xmath82 , @xmath83 and @xmath180 are periodic in @xmath15 and that we require @xmath32 to be periodic , too . in a css solution , where nothing depends on @xmath15 , the @xmath123 constraint becomes an algebraic equation linking @xmath82 , @xmath83 , @xmath32 and @xmath180 . the regular center is both timelike and an @xmath16 line , but @xmath15 is finite there . this requires @xmath35 at the center , and @xmath386 elsewhere . the simplest choice is @xmath385 . on a past patch , it is possible to choose the @xmath15 lines to be timelike , null or spacelike , or to change signature . we consider only the first two possibilities [ [ bondi - past - patch ] ] bondi past patch + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + if we choose the @xmath15-lines to be null everywhere , this means @xmath189 . we then have @xmath49 between the past center and the past light cone , and @xmath45 beyond the past lightcone , so that @xmath12 and @xmath13 both change sign at the past lightcone . @xmath385 and @xmath189 has been used by brady @xcite to investigate css solutions with scalar field matter . he used the bondi metric coefficients that are traditionally called @xmath387 and @xmath388 as parameters . in a dss solution this gives a constraint for a combination of @xmath387 and @xmath388 , as well as evolution equations for @xmath387 and @xmath388 . the best parameterization we have found uses the mass function @xmath32 and the bondi metric coefficient @xmath389 : @xmath390 where the upper sign applies when @xmath15 is an outgoing null coordinate , and the lower sign applies when @xmath15 is an ingoing null coordinate , assuming that @xmath194 . this gives an ode evolution equation and a linear ode constraint for @xmath124 , and an ode evolution equation for @xmath180 . [ [ schwarzschild - past - patch ] ] schwarzschild past patch + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + if the @xmath15-lines are spacelike everywhere , this implies @xmath391 . a natural algebraic condition to impose is to make the @xmath15 lines orthogonal to the @xmath21 lines . this means @xmath392 . @xmath15 is then @xmath393 where @xmath394 is the schwarzschild time coordinate . a possible parameterization is in terms of the metric coefficients often called @xmath32 and @xmath395 in schwarzschild coordinates . ( @xmath32 is the scalar we have defined above ) . the best parameterization we have found is by @xmath32 and @xmath100 , and is given in ( [ pastpatch ] ) above . it gives ode evolution equations for @xmath32 and @xmath180 , and a linear ode constraint equation for @xmath124 . the transport equations for @xmath82 and @xmath83 are linear in @xmath82 and @xmath83 because @xmath382 reduces to a function of @xmath32 , @xmath15 and @xmath16 . the lightcones are at @xmath396 ( although of course only one lightcone can be covered at one time by a past patch ) . on an outer patch that stretches from the past to the future lightcone the @xmath15 lines must be timelike at least somewhere , and it is possible to make them timelike everywhere . the simplest choice for @xmath14 compatible with all these possibilities is @xmath14=1 . [ [ schwarzschild - outer - patch ] ] schwarzschild outer patch + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + assuming that the @xmath15 lines are timelike everywhere means @xmath398 . we have @xmath49 on the past lightcone and @xmath45 on the future lightcone , so that @xmath13 has to change sign somewhere between . this `` @xmath13-surface '' is where the @xmath15 and @xmath16 lines are orthogonal . in @xcite one of us used a coordinate system in the outer patch that was based on schwarzschild coordinates . as in the past patch based on schwarzschild coordinates , this meant @xmath399 . however , when we impose @xmath399 together with @xmath397 , we face an unexpected coordinate singularity at @xmath104 . in particular , if we again use @xmath32 and @xmath100 to parameterize the metric , we obtain an ode constraint and an ode evolution equation for @xmath32 as before on the past patch , but for @xmath180 we obtain an equation of the form @xmath400 in order to make the coordinates regular at @xmath104 , we need to impose the vanishing of the numerator of this equation there , and that is effectively what was done in @xcite . but this introduces an additional boundary condition just to keep the coordinate system regular on a surface where the solution itself is perfectly regular , and that is why we do not use these coordinates here . [ [ best - buy - outer - patch ] ] best buy outer patch + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + a better algebraic condition to combine with @xmath397 is @xmath401 . a workable parameterization is in terms of the mass function @xmath32 and @xmath13 itself . this gives ode evolution equations for @xmath32 and @xmath13 , and a ( nonlinear ) ode constraint for @xmath32 . the lightcones are at @xmath402 . if we replace @xmath13 by @xmath403 , we have the parameterization given above in ( [ outerpatch ] ) , and the ode constraint for @xmath32 becomes linear in @xmath124 , while the wave equation becomes linear in @xmath82 and @xmath83 . [ [ a - c - unworkable ] ] @xmath404 : unworkable + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + it is compatible with @xmath397 to assume that the @xmath15 lines `` bend round '' to become spacelike at large and small @xmath16 . means this that @xmath4 changes sign . a natural choice is that @xmath12 and @xmath4 change sign together , and we can impose this by setting @xmath404 . we have not found a way of parameterizing this choice in a way that brings the einstein equations into the standard form ( [ standardform ] ) . parameterizing with @xmath13 and @xmath31 gives two roots for @xmath12 . using @xmath12 and @xmath31 gives two roots for @xmath13 . [ [ x - and - tau - orthogonal - unworkable ] ] @xmath16 and @xmath15 orthogonal : unworkable + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + we can also force the `` bending round '' by making @xmath15 and @xmath16 lines orthogonal everywhere , or @xmath405 . this implies that , while they are independent , @xmath12 and @xmath4 change sign together . parameterizing by @xmath12 and @xmath4 we obtain an evolution equation and a constraint for @xmath12 and a constraint for @xmath4 . but the constraint for @xmath4 is homogeneous , @xmath406 , so that @xmath4 can not be periodic . therefore this coordinate system is not compatible with css or dss . [ [ forcing - the - lightcones - unworkable ] ] forcing the lightcones : unworkable + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + instead of finding a working outer patch and then forcing the two lightcones to fall on the lines @xmath43 and @xmath47 by imposing @xmath407 , we can make @xmath12 a given function of @xmath16 . the simplest such choice is @xmath408 , which vanishes at @xmath409 . ( the two lightcones will be distinguished by the sign of @xmath13 ) . a parameterization that brings the einstein equations into standard form is @xmath410 this gives an evolution equation and a constraint for @xmath127 and a linear constraint for @xmath411 . however , the right - hand sides of all three equations are of the form @xmath412 . furthermore , at @xmath413 the numerator of @xmath414 depends on the matter through @xmath415 , while the numerator of @xmath416 depends on the matter through @xmath417 . ( the numerator of @xmath418 is proportional to that of @xmath414 . ) that means that we would have to impose two independent regularity conditions at @xmath413 . together these would fix @xmath82 and @xmath83 completely . therefore this coordinate system is not sufficiently generic near the line @xmath405 . from ( [ expansion1],[expansion2 ] ) we see that @xmath419 the regular coefficients to @xmath186 are as follows : @xmath420 is the unique periodic solution of @xmath421 and @xmath422,\\ a_1&=&-{\xi\over 2}(u_0 ^ 2-v_0 ^ 2 ) , \\ b_1&=&-{\xi'\over a_0}-{\xi\over 2a_0}\left(-3+a_0 ^ 2 + 2v_0 ^ 2\right),\\ b_2&=&-{a_1\over 2 a_0}b_1 \nonumber \\ & & -{\xi\over 4a_0 } \left(2a_0a_1-b_1u_0 ^ 2+b_1v_0 ^ 2 + 4v_0v_1\right ) , \\ d_1&=&-{a_0 b_1\over \xi } .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the regular coefficients to higher orders continue in this style , with @xmath423 the solution of a linear inhomogeneous ode , while @xmath424 , @xmath425 and @xmath426 are given algebraically . the nonvanishing singular coefficients up to @xmath427 are @xmath428 we only give two examples of how these coefficients are derived . substituting the ansatz into the @xmath310 equation and isolating the terms of @xmath429 in the result , we obtain @xmath430 we solve this for all @xmath15 and @xmath182 by setting @xmath431 and by making @xmath432 the unique solution of the ode @xmath433 if we substitute the ansatz into the @xmath176 equation ( [ u_singular_eq ] ) and isolate the terms of @xmath434 , we find @xmath435 because @xmath436 , the derivatives @xmath437 cancel out . taking also into account that @xmath438 ( this is an accident at this particular order ) , the equation can be rewritten as @xmath439\hat u_{1+\epsilon}^{(i ) } \nonumber \\ + \left[-\epsilon d_2 - 2a_0a_2)\check u_\epsilon\right ] \hat u_\epsilon + \left[-kd_2\check u_\epsilon\right ] \hat u_\epsilon ' + \left[\check v_{1+\epsilon}-2a_0\check a_{1+\epsilon}u_0\right ] \hat a_{1+\epsilon}=0.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the terms in square brackets all depend on @xmath15 and each multiplies a different known function of @xmath182 . to solve this for all @xmath15 and @xmath182 , we assign one term @xmath440 to each function of @xmath182 : @xmath441 the corresponding coefficients @xmath442 are the unique solutions of the odes @xmath443 where the source terms @xmath444 can be read off directly from ( [ u1pe ] ) . the calculation of the other terms proceeds in a similar manner at all orders . note that the functions of type @xmath445 , where @xmath180 stands for @xmath83 , @xmath32 and @xmath127 , are given algebraically and @xmath446 obeys an ode . for @xmath82 it is the other way around . the limit @xmath447 of our expansion exists . the regular @xmath448 terms in the series vanish identically , and so do some of the @xmath449 terms but not all of them . @xmath349 and @xmath347 for example vanish because they are proportional to @xmath173 , but @xmath348 is proportional to @xmath450 , and so encodes the curvature to @xmath186 . in the limit @xmath451 the curvature components proportional to @xmath287 are no longer continuous at the ch because they are now periodic in @xmath452 , but for the same reason they remain bounded . the components proportional to @xmath453 and @xmath454 are still continuous even then because @xmath83 is @xmath186 . @xmath32 is also still continuous , with @xmath282 on the cauchy horizon . in the notation of @xcite , the roberts solution @xcite is given by @xmath455 , \\ \label{roberts3 } \phi(u , v ) & = & \frac{1}{\sqrt{16\pi g } } \log \frac{(1-p)v - u}{(1+p)v - u},\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath0 a constant parameter . @xmath365 is minkowski spacetime with zero scalar field , and without loss of generality @xmath456 . only the regions @xmath457 are physical and without loss of generality , we consider the right side ( @xmath458 ) of the spacetime . for @xmath459 , the lines @xmath460 are central curvature singularities : the mass function @xmath461 diverges on them . the line @xmath462 , @xmath463 is timelike and has ( infinite ) negative mass , and for @xmath463 forms the past branch of the roberts singularity . the line @xmath464 is timelike with negative mass for @xmath465 , null with zero mass for @xmath364 , and spacelike with positive mass @xmath466 . for @xmath467 it forms the future segment of the singularity . some of our solutions become asymptotically css and have @xmath468 , therefore approaching the roberts spacetime . we know that the solutions develop a timelike , negative mass singularity , which must correspond to one of the two branches of the roberts singularity . in this appendix we study the issue of which of the two branches is actually approached in our numerical evolutions and for what values of @xmath0 . our scalars @xmath82 and @xmath83 are @xmath469 where both denominators are positive in the region of interest . it is clear that @xmath0 is covariantly defined by @xmath82 and @xmath83 on the light cones @xmath470 or @xmath471 , respectively . however , at the singularities @xmath460 the scalars take values @xmath472 for any @xmath473 in the roberts solution . if we use an expansion using a generic self - similar coordinate @xmath159 such that @xmath474 with the singularity at @xmath139 [ that is , @xmath475 : @xmath476 therefore @xmath0 is covariantly given by the ratio of the rates at which @xmath82 and @xmath83 approach their values at the singularity : @xmath477 this determines both @xmath0 and which branch of the singularity we approach locally : the upper sign applies for @xmath478 ( past branch , turned upside down ) and the lower sign for @xmath479 ( future branch of the singularity ) . we can relate the coordinates @xmath480 of ( [ roberts1]-[roberts3 ] ) to our coordinate @xmath16 through @xmath481 this expression applies only for negative @xmath16 and so only covers the future branch of the singularity . we obtain the expressions for the past branch exchanging the role of the functions @xmath82 and @xmath83 . that explains why exchanging @xmath82 and @xmath83 in eq . ( [ uvratio ] ) amounts to a change of branch . it also shows that we have to change branch four times per @xmath9-period as we move through the four quadrants determined by the lines @xmath482 and @xmath483 . c. gundlach , living reviews in relativity * 2 * , 4 ( 1999 ) , published electronically at http://www.livingreviews.org . for an updated version see c. gundlach , critical phenomena in gravitational collapse , to be published in phys . , preprint gr - qc/0210101 . Abstract:
[ "at the threshold of black hole formation in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field a naked singularity is formed through a universal critical solution that is discretely self - similar . we study the global spacetime structure of this solution . it is spherically symmetric , discretely self - similar , regular at the center to the past of the singularity , and regular at the past lightcone of the singularity . at the future lightcone of the singularity , which is also a cauchy horizon , the curvature is finite and continuous but not differentiable . to the future of the cauchy horizon the solution is not unique , but depends on a free function ( the null data coming out of the naked singularity ) . there is a unique continuation with a regular center ( which is self - similar ) . all other self - similar continuations have a central timelike singularity with negative mass ." ]
13,781
13,781
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: cataclysmic variables ( cvs ) are a diverse group of short - period binaries in which a late - type , roche - lobe filling secondary star transfers matter through an accretion disk onto a white dwarf primary . the standard paradigm for the formation of cvs postulates that they start out as wide binaries ( on the order of 1 au ) , of moderate orbital period ( @xmath5 1 yr ) . as the more massive component , the white dwarf progenitor , evolves off of the main sequence , the secondary star suddenly finds itself orbiting within the red giant photosphere . during this `` common envelope '' ( ce ) phase , much of the angular momentum of the binary is believed to be shed due to interactions of the secondary star with the atmosphere of the red giant . during this process , the binary period gets shortened , and the red giant envelope gets ejected . depending on the input parameters used in standard ce models , between 50 and 90% of all of these close binary stars merge ( c.f . , politano & weiler 2007 ) . after emerging from the ce phase , an epoch of angular momentum loss via magnetic braking ( verbunt & zwaan 1981 ) , lasting @xmath6 10@xmath7 yr ( warner 1995 ) , is then required that leads to the formation of a semi - detached binary , and the mass transfer phase that signals the birth of a cv . in this scenario , the vast majority of cv secondary stars should not show any signs of evolution , as there just has not been sufficient time for the low mass secondary stars ( m@xmath8 @xmath9 1 m@xmath10 ) in these systems to have begun to evolve off of the main sequence . thus , the composition of the secondary stars should be relatively normal unless they have accreted matter with an unusual composition during the ce phase , or perhaps during classical novae eruptions . in an infrared spectroscopic survey of cvs , harrison et al . ( 2004 , 2005 ) found that the co features of the secondary stars in a number of cvs were much weaker than expected for their spectral types . for u gem , the co features were extremely weak , yet the water vapor feature was normal for a spectral type of m4v . this suggested a deficit of carbon . hamilton et al . ( 2011 ) have tabulated the list of cvs with weaker than expected co features , and show that , when such data exists , analysis of uv spectra _ also _ find evidence for carbon deficiencies . one issue with the infrared spectroscopy surveys was that they were qualitative , and were derived from lower resolution ( r @xmath0 2000 ) spectroscopy . the line features in those spectra _ might _ be compromised due to veiling by a continuum source that arises from the accretion disk . we have obtained moderate , and lower resolution , @xmath1-band spectroscopy of three of the brightest cvs : ss cyg , ru peg , and gk per . previous near - infrared spectroscopy with spex ( harrison et al . 2004 , 2007 ) revealed that the secondary stars in these three systems had weaker than expected co features . in the following , we use a modified version of the moog spectral synthesis program to model moderate resolution @xmath1-band spectra to examine the atomic and molecular abundances in their secondary stars . as shown in hamilton et al . ( 2011 ) , higher resolution spectra dramatically reduce the effects of accretion disk veiling , allowing us to see secondary stars even in cv systems where the accretion luminosity totally dominates that of the secondary star . in the systems discussed here , however , the secondary star dominates the accretion disk flux in the @xmath1-band , and any veiling has to be quite small . we then compare the best fit model spectra derived from the higher resolution data to lower resolution data . in the next section we discuss the data to be modeled , in section 3 we discuss the spectral synthesis procedure , in section 4 we present the modeling of the data , discuss the results in section 5 and draw our conclusions in section 6 . ss cyg , ru peg , and gk per were observed using nirspec in high resolution mode on keck ii on 2004 august 28 . the 0.432 x 12 slit was used providing a resolving power of r @xmath0 25000 , or a velocity resolution of @xmath11 @xmath0 12 km s@xmath12 . we employed the two - nod script , and we used five minute exposure times for the three program cvs . to completely cover the @xmath1-band using nirspec requires two grating settings . due to time limitations , however , we only obtained data at a single grating position chosen to insure coverage of the first overtone bandhead of @xmath13co@xmath14 at 2.294 @xmath15 m . this grating setting also covers the @xmath13co@xmath16 bandhead at 2.383 @xmath15 m . in addition to the three program cvs , we also observed two late - type stars , @xmath17 eri ( k2v ) and @xmath18 psc ( g9iii ) , to provide templates for our synthetic spectral program given that the properties of those two objects are well known . to correct for telluric absorption , we observed bright a0v stars located close to the program objects so as to minimize their relative differences in airmass . these data were reduced using the idl routine `` @xmath19 '' , specially developed for nirspec package can be found here : http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/inst/nirspec/redspec/index.html ] . in the @xmath1-band , the spectra of a0v stars are nearly featureless , except for the prominent h i brackett @xmath18 feature at 2.16 @xmath15 m . the @xmath19 package does not attempt to correct for this feature , but can interpolate across such lines to reduce their impact upon division into the program star spectrum . note that there is a weak telluric feature located very close to the brackett @xmath18 line , and thus the h i line profiles in spectra produced by the division of a `` patched '' a - star spectrum are slightly compromised . just prior to our observing run on keck , we observed the three program cvs using spex at the irtf on 2004 august 15 . spex was used in cross - dispersed mode generating spectra spanning the range from 0.8 to 2.45 @xmath15 m . in the @xmath1-band , the dispersion is 5.4 / pix . the raw data were reduced using spextool ( cushing et al . 2004 ) . a log of all of our observations is presented in table 1 , and includes the orbital phase at the mid - point of the observational sequence for each of the three cvs . the aavso light curve data base shows that ss cyg was in quiescence at the time of both the spex and nirspec observations , having reached visual maximum on 17 july . ru peg was in outburst on 23 july , but was in quiescence for both observing runs . at the time of the infrared observations , gk per had @xmath20 = 13.1 , its normal minimum light value . to calculate a synthetic spectrum , three basic building blocks are required : a stellar atmosphere model , a list of atomic and molecular lines , and a tool to calculate the corresponding flux at the stellar surface as a function of wavelength . a full description of the modified version of moog and the grid generation and spectral matching python code ( called `` _ kmoog _ '' ) used below is described in hamilton ( 2013 ) , here we highlight the most important aspects . there are several groups that provide precomputed atmosphere models , each with their own slightly different assumptions , simplifications , and basic input physics . most of the models in general circulation , however , have the same underlying assumptions : the atmosphere is either modeled as a series of plane - parallel slabs ( 1d ) , or as a series of concentric shells ( 2d ) . the 1d and 2d atmosphere models are calculated assuming local thermodynamic equilibrium ( lte ) conditions , in which one temperature can describe the particle velocity distribution as well as the population of atomic levels and ionization states around a given point in the stellar atmosphere . it is also assumed that the atmosphere is time invariant , with the effects of dynamical processes such as mixing and convection parameterized . bonifacio et al . ( 2012 ) provide an overview of the more detailed assumptions and differences between the available atmosphere computation methods and programs . full 3d ( radiation - hydrodynamic ) stellar atmosphere models have been calculated across parameter grids ( e.g. , ludwig et al . 2009 , hauschildt and baron 2010 , magic et al . 2013a , 2013b ) . for this program , however , we have only used the 1d and 2d models . the most commonly used atmosphere model codes are phoenix ( hauschildt et al . ( 1999 ) , allard et al . 2011 ) , marcs ( gustafsson et al . 1975 , 2008 ) , and atlas ( sbordone et al . 2004 ) . phoenix is perhaps the most computationally sophisticated , sampling 42 million atomic and 550 million molecular lines when calculating opacity . marcs model atmospheres are consistently updated through a web interface providing both 1d and 2d models . ultimately for this project , we chose to use marcs atmospheres . an important consideration for this choice was the existence of the interpolation code to create subgrid models , making it much simpler to construct a large grid of models quickly . very recently , mszros et al . ( 2012 ) presented a new grid of atmospheres based off of atlas and marcs codes with an updated h@xmath21o line list as well as finer grid spacings in temperature , gravity , metallicity , and c and @xmath22 abundances . given their recent availability , however , all analyses and spectra computed here use solely the original marcs grid . the next crucial step to constructing a synthetic spectrum is to assemble a list of atomic and molecular transitions for which you wish to calculate an opacity at the stellar surface . for our project we used the atlas line list with the addition of the co line list by goorvitch ( 1994 ) . each line list was converted into a common format before combining , and , in the case of the co line list , only lines with @xmath23 and 2.28 @xmath24 2.405 @xmath15 m were kept . the final list contains a total of 11,681 lines . for the purposes of this work , only computations involving diatomic molecules were considered . this eliminates lines of the important molecular species for the cooler m dwarfs commonly found in cvs , such as h@xmath21o . as described below , synthetic spectra for the sun and arcturus were generated and compared to observations to provide the initial validation of this line list . there are a number of codes that can readily make use of marcs and kurucz atmospheres . moogchris / moog.html ] ( sneden 1973 ) has one of the longest track records , and given its ubiquity , we chose it to compute the synthetic spectra for this work . when creating a spectrum , moog is internally limited to considering only 2500 lines in the line list . given the size of our line list , we modified moog ( see hamilton 2013 ) to allow for lists of 250,000 lines . two additional changes were made to the moog source code . first , a version was created to produce absolutely no output to the screen . this prevents unnecessary lag and slowdowns , as well as greatly enhances usability when running a large number of models simultaneously . second , and most importantly , a new binary output file type of moog was created . significant savings in storage size were realized by creating a true fits output type , reducing the file size of a successfully created model by a factor of five or more . the fits files created also have the benefit of being fully compliant and compatible with the standard cfitsio libraries , unlike the fits - like output already in the code . the fits output created also has the benefit of storing both a full resolution spectrum as well as one convolved to lower resolutions , useful for quickly comparing against observations from different telescopes and instruments . to validate our line list , we constructed synthetic spectra for the sun ( using the solar marcs model ) and arcturus ( using the parameters listed in table 2 , but with log@xmath25 = 3.0 ) to compare them to high resolution @xmath1-band spectra published by wallace et al . ( 1996 ) , and wallace & hinkle ( 1996 ) . we concentrated on the reproduction of only the strongest spectral features observed in these two objects . note that the arcturus comparison was only used to insure that we were not missing lines that become important at lower temperatures . we then altered the oscillator strengths of the most highly discrepant lines to insure that they would both fit the observations better , and not bias the automated fitting process . for example , there were a large number of sc i transitions that had oscillator strengths that were much too large . unfortunately , oscillator strengths for many of the transitions in the @xmath1-band do not appear in the nist atomic spectra database , and thus we used trial and error adjustment of the tabulated oscillator strength in the line list to better reproduce the observed spectral feature ( for a primer on the identification of the strongest spectral features found in the @xmath1-band for k - type stars , see fig . 5 in harrison et al . 2004 ) . to test our ability to reproduce observations , we have constructed synthetic spectra to compare to the nirspec observations of @xmath17 eri and @xmath18 psc , and to a sample lower resolution spectra of k dwarfs contained in the irtf spectral library ( cushing et al . we summarize the spectroscopically derived parameters for these objects in table 2 , averaging the data compiled in the pastel catalog ( soubiran et al . 2010 ) for each object , constrained to measures made after 1970 . the final column of table 2 denotes how many unique measurements went into the determination of each of the average properties for each star ( note that hd45977 only has a single measurement of its characteristics by sousa et al . as we will see , this sample more than spans the range in metallicity observed for our program cvs . note that the solar abundance pattern derived by grevesse et al . ( 2007 ) was used for all of the synthetic spectra , and only the abundance of carbon was altered for the investigation of the cvs . in preparation for comparison to the models , the spectra were continuum normalized using a third order polynomial fit in iraf . for the high resolution spectra , the process was quite trivial . for the full @xmath1-band spectra , however , we used an identical set of wavelength bins for identifying the continuum to be fit . the continua were then fitted over the range 2.08 to 2.29 @xmath15 m , with bins that avoided all of the strongest spectral features . the nirspec spectrum of @xmath17 eri is presented in fig . [ eps ] , where data for five of the seven spectral orders are shown ( the first order , spanning @xmath262.43 to 2.47 @xmath15 m , was too far red to obtain appreciable signal in our cv spectra , while the seventh order spectrum is dominated by the strong telluric feature at 2.05 @xmath15 m ) . as shown in table 2 , @xmath17 eri has a temperature near 5100 k , and a near - solar metallicity of [ fe / h ] = @xmath20.1 . in fig . [ eps ] , we overplot a synthetic spectrum with t = 5100 k , and [ fe / h ] = @xmath20.125 ( interpolated between the model atmospheres with [ fe / h ] = @xmath20.25 , and [ fe / h ] = 0.0 ) . the model fit to the strongest lines is excellent . note that we have inserted an h i br@xmath18 line into our line list . we do this to primarily show where this line is located . the profiles of this feature as found in the infrared spectra for each of the objects are unreliable due to the reduction technique . in addition , the profile of such a strong line can not be easily reproduced using moog . @xmath18 psc allows us to test our ability to reproduce a much lower gravity object with a very low metallicity . we used a marcs spherical , alpha - enhanced model atmosphere with log@xmath25 = 2.5 , and [ fe / h ] = @xmath20.5 to generate a synthetic spectrum for @xmath18 psc . as noted in alves - brito et al . ( 2010 ) , @xmath18 psc has a modest alpha - enhancement of @xmath0 @xmath270.2 , and thus many of the metal lines are stronger in @xmath18 psc than they would be in a model that has a solar abundance pattern . since @xmath28 does not yet have the capabilities to adjust the abundances of any other species besides carbon , we ran the moog binary used by @xmath28 in a stand - alone mode , increasing the abundances of o , al and mg as detailed in alves - brito et al . we overplot this model on the observed data in fig . [ gamma ] . the resulting synthetic spectrum is a reasonable match to the data . given that the majority of cvs are too faint for moderate resolution infrared spectroscopy , most of the existing @xmath1-band data have been obtained at a lower resolution . to examine how well we can model such data sets we have downloaded spex data for dwarf stars spanning the spectral types k0v to k7v . the spectral type range k0v to k3v is shown in fig . [ k0tok3 ] , while the range k4v to k7v is shown in fig . [ k4tok7 ] . we generated synthetic spectra for each of these stars using the parameters listed in table 2 . the published metallicities produced excellent fits over most of the spectral range for all of the stars except hd145675 ( k0v ) . we found that the best fitting model for hd145675 over the entire @xmath1-band required a lower metallicity , [ fe / h ] = @xmath270.25 , than tabulated for this object ( though within the observed error bars ) . close inspection of fig . [ k0tok3 ] shows that the synthetic spectra do not do a very good job of matching the strongest spectral features in the 2.10 to 2.15 @xmath15 m bandpass . the origin of this discrepancy is not obvious . the fit of the synthetic spectra over the rest of the @xmath1-band suggests the tabulated ( or derived ) metallicities are correct . this might be a problem with continuum subtraction . to investigate this , we reduced and plot the spex data for the g9v star hd161198 observed during the same run as our program cvs [ note that hd161198 is a spectroscopic binary with a cool secondary star ( duquennoy et al . 1996 ) , and it is not a useful spectral template ] . the model for hd145675 does a good job at fitting the spectrum of hd161198 in this range , indicating that continuum subtraction is not the issue . this suggests that the problem could be due to either the data reduction process , or some issue with the telluric standard and/or object spectra . the maximum amount of observed signal occurs in this bandpass , and the k0v , k1v , and k3v have @xmath1 @xmath9 4.7 ( hd3765 has @xmath1 = 5.16 , while hd145675 has @xmath1 = 5.55 ) , so perhaps it is a linearity issue . the discrepancy between the models and observed spectra in the 2.10 to 2.15 @xmath15 m bandpass is not as severe for the k4v to k7v templates ( even though the k7v template is 61 cyg b , with @xmath1 = 2.32 ) . clearly , however , our synthetic spectra do an excellent job at matching objects with known temperatures and metallicities . especially important for the current program is the match of the model spectra to the observed co features over a wide range of temperature and metallicity . in the preceding we have modeled the spectra of objects with known parameters . for modeling the cvs , where the temperatures and metallicities are poorly known , requires the generation of a large number of models , and a robust method to match the synthetic spectra to the observations . with the python wrapper we have constructed to the modified version of the moog program described above , we are able to generate a large grid of models covering a user - defined range of the following parameters : t@xmath29 , log @xmath25 , [ fe / h ] , and [ c / fe ] . microturbulence was fixed at 2 km s@xmath30 , and macroturbulence was not included since it is a small effect at the resolution of our observational data . in _ , if the synthetic spectra are designated to be stored as fits files , each model actually contains two synthetic spectra : one unsmoothed , full resolution model , and one model convolved with a rotationally broadened spectrum appropriate for the target at the observed spectral resolution ( which must be specified before the grid creation ) . a full grid covering the entire parameter space ( 3800 @xmath9 t@xmath29 @xmath9 5200 k , 3.0 @xmath9 log @xmath25 @xmath9 5.0 , @xmath31 @xmath9 [ fe / h ] @xmath9 @xmath271 , and @xmath31 @xmath9 [ c / fe ] @xmath9 @xmath271 ) requires about one day to create on a 32 core machine and occupies @xmath0 86 gbyte in fits output format . obviously , smaller grids can be generated much more rapidly if the input parameter space can be narrowed . with such large grids , it is easy to be overwhelmed by the quantity of data . given a suitable subset of parameters , a direct grid search is possible ; gather a list of valid models , and step through them one at a time comparing the model to observations . given the sometimes low s / n of the observational data , however , a @xmath32 statistic is not calculated across the entire observational range , but restricted to the areas of greatest impact . for example , including na i , ca i , mg i , al i , fe i lines , and the co bands . this restricted region has the advantage of avoiding areas prone to increased levels of noise , and generally improves the quality of the fits to the observations . another method of stepping through the parameter space involves the use of an evolutionary algorithm to find the best fit to the data . evolutionary algorithms are based off the ideas of biological evolution , the simple premise that in some given population only the `` fittest individuals '' ( combination of all parameters ) will `` breed '' and influence the next generation of that population . if we imagine representing our parameters as 1d binary strings , then the behavior and the manipulation of the binary strings over the course of the fit is not unlike that of dna during reproduction . sets of parameters can be mutated , introducing diversity into the population which helps to avoid getting stuck in a local maximum or minimum in the `` @xmath33 landscape '' . mutations take the form of bit flips or swaps , analogous to transcription errors in dna replication . we used a genetic algorithm framework called @xmath34 . the algorithm proceeds as follows : 1 . make an initial first guess at the parameters based on spectral shape 2 . choose an appropriate maximum number of generations to evolve through as well as the initial population size 3 . `` breed '' and `` mutate '' the `` fittest '' members in the population to create a new generation 4 . repeat # 3 until the population converges to the desired level in this manner , all parameters are varied continually as the population converges towards some minimum @xmath32 , at least a factor of four faster than the plain grid searching technique . using both grid search and genetic algorithm techniques , the grid created with moog can be readily compared with the appropriate subset of cv spectra to attempt to determine as many stellar parameters as possible . both methods are available in _ kmoog _ , though we find the brute force is sufficiently rapid and as reliable as the genetic algorithm technique . heat maps showing the best fitting models for any two parameters are then generated to allow the determination of the best fitting model(s ) . as we will find below , determining the exact value t@xmath29 or [ fe / h ] for an unconstrained object from a @xmath1-band spectrum is difficult . many of the relevant oscillator strengths for transitions in this bandpass are unknown , and we have had to estimate a number of them by comparison of models to observations . in addition , our line list is incomplete , and thus weaker spectra features can contribute in a negative fashion to the assessment of the fit of a model to the data . the issues of telluric correction and continuum subtraction , as noted above , can introduce additional uncertainties into the goal of finding the best fitting solution . thus , the @xmath32 analysis just described must be done carefully , focussing on the strongest spectral features , insuring that there is not a spectroscopic anomaly in that feature which can be attributed to random noise variation , or to the telluric correction process . it is extremely difficult to produce a fully automated best fit regimen that can blindly solve for the parameters of a previously unconstrained object in the @xmath1-band , even when focused on specific spectral lines . currently , we manually examine the @xmath32 analysis for each line / region to insure that it is reliable , and that no unexpected events have occurred that affect the line / region under analysis . one such anomaly will be encountered shortly when we discuss the al i line ( at 2.116 @xmath15 m ) in ss cyg . it has an unusual strength that defies obvious explanation . @xmath35 analysis of this line results in a super - solar abundance . we continue to work on the matching aspects of _ kmoog _ , but in its current state , a more interactive ( `` hands - on '' ) approach is required to insure the most robust results . given that we have some information on the spectral types of the secondary stars in our cvs , we decided to use smaller grid than can be generated with the default settings of _ kmoog_. for example , tests in hamilton ( 2013 ) show that even the moderate resolution @xmath1-band spectra are inadequate for assessing gravity . given the large rotational broadening of our targets , it will be impossible to constrain the surface gravity for the program cvs . thus we fixed log @xmath25 = 4.5 for modeling ss cyg and ru peg , and log @xmath25 = 4.0 for gk per ( see below ) , to reduce parameter space , and increase the efficiency of the grid searching process . we postpone the discussion of error bar estimation to section 4.4 . ss cyg is the prototype long period ( p@xmath36 = 6.603 hr ) dwarf nova with eruptions that recur on a monthly basis . harrison et al . ( 2004 ) estimate the spectral type of the secondary as k4/k5 , consistent with other published values . they noted , however , that the co features were very weak for this spectral classification . bitner et al . ( 2007 ) have used moderate resolution visual band spectroscopy to examine the masses of both components , and found that the secondary star is 10 to 50% larger than a star of its mass and temperature should be . they suggest that the secondary star in ss cyg is evolved , and may have a core that is depleted in hydrogen . they also measured a rotational velocity of @xmath37sin@xmath38 = 89 km s@xmath12 for the secondary star . the nirspec spectrum of ss cyg is presented in fig . [ sscyg ] . the large rotational broadening of the spectral features is apparent . our observations spanned @xmath39 = 0.05 . at the observed phase ( using the k@xmath8 = 162.5 km s@xmath12 value derived by bitner et al . ) , the total change in radial velocity over our set of observations would be @xmath11 = 11 km s@xmath12 , resulting in minimal `` orbital smearing . '' concentrating on the sixth order bandpass ( 2.095 to 2.128 @xmath15 m ) , we convolved solar metallicity models having t = 4700 k with rotational velocities ranging from 70 to 110 km s@xmath12 . the lowest @xmath33 values were for @xmath37sin@xmath38 = 90 @xmath40 10 km s@xmath12 . for the modeling below , we adopt the bitner et al . value of @xmath37sin@xmath38 = 89 km s@xmath12 for ss cyg . to attempt to reproduce the nirspec data , we generated a grid of models spanning 4200 k @xmath9 t@xmath29 @xmath9 4900 k , @xmath41 @xmath9 [ fe / h ] @xmath9 @xmath270.50 , and @xmath42 @xmath9 [ c / fe ] @xmath9 @xmath270.25 . the resulting heat map for the sixth order , based on @xmath33 fits to _ only _ the first two of the three strong lines in the wavelength interval 2.104 and 2.118 @xmath15 m is shown in fig . [ sshm02 ] . the best fit occurs for t = 4700 k , and [ fe / h ] = @xmath20.25 . the fourth order contains a number of metal lines from ti i and fe i , though this spectral region is noisier than the data at shorter wavelengths . the resulting heat map , fig . [ sshm04 ] , is consistent with the result for the sixth order , though the value of [ fe / h ] is less constrained . the results for the third order containing the @xmath13co@xmath14 bandhead is shown in fig . [ sshm05 ] , and suggests [ c / fe ] @xmath9 @xmath20.5 . the best fit synthetic spectrum is overplotted on the data in fig . [ sscyg ] has these values , and fits the data set quite well . there is only one apparent anomaly in the nirspec spectrum of ss cyg , and that is the al i line at 2.116 @xmath15 m . we overplot the derived best fit model spectrum on the irtf spex observation in fig . [ ssirtf ] . the fit is quite good , given the s / n of those data . the main differences between the model and the low resolution spectrum is again the al i line 2.116 @xmath15 m , and an mg i feature at 2.282 @xmath15 m . the al i line was perfectly reproduced for the solar spectrum and for @xmath17 eri , but does appear to be slightly under - predicted for the irtf spectral sequence ( though note our earlier discussion of the anomalous continuum in this bandpass ) . the line at 2.109 @xmath15 m is also due to al i , thus the abundance of aluminum is not unusual . it is odd that this line is perfectly reproduced for our other cvs . there is an he i line at this position that is often seen weakly in emission in the @xmath1-band spectra of other cvs with more prominent accretion disks , such as tt ari , see fig . [ ttari ] . this emission line might be the cause of the peaks in the continuum on either side of this line in fig . [ ssirtf ] , but the effect of any such emission line would be to lessen the depth of the feature , not increase its strength . the mg i line at 2.282 @xmath15 m is well reproduced by _ kmoog _ for all of the template star spectra . this line is very weak in the spex spectrum of ss cyg . since the mg i line at 2.106 @xmath15 m is at the appropriate strength in both the moderate and lower resolution data sets , we conclude that this is simply a s / n or telluric correction issue . the nirspec and spex data were obtained at quite different orbital phases , 0.20 and 0.40 , respectively . the @xmath1-band light curve of ss cyg presented in harrison et al . ( 2007a ) shows no evidence for irradiation at @xmath43 = 0.5 , and the @xmath1 magnitudes at these two phases in this light curve are nearly identical . thus , the fact that the same synthetic spectrum works for both epochs is not surprising . this does prove , however , that irradiation of the secondary star is not the source that weakens the co absorption features , as the amount of the irradiated hemisphere seen at the dramatically different orbital phases of our spectra has no influence on the strength of the co features . ru peg is a u gem type dwarf nova of very long period ( p@xmath36 = 8.99 hr ) , whose binary parameters were first examined by kraft ( 1962 ) , observing doubled ca ii lines at some points in the orbital phase and a spectrum broadly consistent with a g8 iv to k0 v. friend et al . ( 1990 ) observed the @xmath268190 na i doublet to measure radial velocity motion of ru peg , finding that the secondary star is cooler and less massive than expected , with the spectrum being consistent with a k3 dwarf . they also note that the secondary star must be somewhat evolved , as the temperature , and masses derived are inconsistent with a main sequence dwarf . harrison et al . ( 2004 ) presented irtf observations of ru peg , showing that the nir spectrum was consistent with a spectral type of k2 , but that ru peg must contain a subgiant since it would be over - luminous for a dwarf at the distance given by its parallax . dunford et al . ( 2012 ) recently presented spectra of ru peg analyzed with roche tomograms , deriving a much cooler spectral type of k5 . along with the estimation of a cooler spectral type than found previously , dunford et al . used moderate resolution visual band spectra to estimate @xmath37sin@xmath38 = 89 km s@xmath12 . as for ss cyg , we convolved a solar abundance model with t@xmath29 = 4700 k to make our own estimate of the rotation velocity and found a slightly higher value of @xmath37sin@xmath38 = 95 @xmath40 10 km s@xmath12 . we have used this value in generating the synthetic spectra that follow . using the same size grid as that for ss cyg , the @xmath44 analysis for the sixth order , shown in fig . [ ruhm04 ] , suggests solar metallicities , and 4600 @xmath9 t@xmath29 @xmath9 4700 k. the results for the fourth order ( fig . [ ruhm02 ] ) indicate slightly subsolar metallicities , and 4500 @xmath9 t@xmath29 @xmath9 4900 k. we conclude that the secondary star has t@xmath29 = 4700 k , and [ fe / h ] = 0.0 . analysis of the co features in the third spectral order ( fig . [ ruhm05 ] ) finds [ c / fe ] = @xmath20.75 . a synthetic spectrum with these values is overplotted on the nirspec data in fig . [ rupeg ] , and provides an excellent fit to the data in all of the spectral orders . the h i emission from the disk is lower than seen in ss cyg , and the underlying h i br@xmath18 absorption from the secondary star leaves its imprint on the emission line profile . note that the long period and orbital phase at which the observations occurred make for minimal orbital smearing for the duration of our data taking : @xmath11 = 20 km s@xmath12 . the final model derived for the nirspec spectrum is overplotted on the spex data in fig . [ rupegirtf ] . this model fits the lower resolution data very well , including all of the other strong @xmath13co bandheads in the red part of the @xmath1-band . sion et al . ( 2004 ) found that the carbon abundance in the photosphere of the white dwarf was 10% of solar . thus , the carbon deficit observed in the uv can be directly traced to the secondary star . sion et al . also found that silicon suffered a similar deficit as that of carbon . the most prominent si i lines in the wavelength range plotted in fig . [ rupegirtf ] are at 2.136 and 2.189 @xmath15 m , and while these lines are weak in our data , and the s / n not very high , they seem to be well represented by our solar abundance model . gk per is an old classical nova , having experienced an extremely luminous nova eruption in 1901 ( see harrison et al . it has since exhibited periodic dwarf nova outbursts every 2 - 3 years since 1966 , brightening by @xmath0 3 mag during these events . kraft ( 1964 ) detected the mass donor star in the optical , adopting a spectral type of k2 iv and noting that the spectrum was highly variable with an equivalent width of sr ii 4077 consistent with a giant at one point and a dwarf the next . more recently , morales - reuda et al . ( 2012 ) analyzed spectra of gk per , finding that the donor star appeared as k1 iv . their analysis consisted of an iterative template subtraction method , however , not direct detection of the secondary star . harrison et al . ( 2007b ) presented a @xmath1-band spectrum of the mass donor star in gk per , and found that it has extremely weak co features . the radial velocity study conducted by morales - reuda et al . found @xmath37sin@xmath38 = 61.5 @xmath40 11.8 km s@xmath12 , k@xmath8 = 120.5 @xmath40 0.7 km s@xmath12 , and a mass ratio of @xmath45 = 0.55 @xmath40 0.21 . given the luminosity of its classical nova eruption suggests a massive white dwarf . if this is true , the radial velocity solution implies a surface gravity for the secondary star of log @xmath25 @xmath9 4 . as noted above , it is not possible to constrain the surface gravity of the program objects given the limitations of our data set . thus , in contrast to ss cyg and ru peg , we set the surface gravity to log @xmath25 = 4.0 for our modeling of gk per ( though this produced identical results to models with log @xmath25 = 4.5 ) . as for the preceding two objects , we analyzed the rotational velocity apparent in our nirspec data and find @xmath37sin@xmath38 = 55 @xmath40 10 km s@xmath12 , slightly lower than that derived by morales - rueda et al . , but agreeing within the error bars of the two measurements . we use this value in all of our modeling . the nirspec data is plotted in fig . [ gkper ] . @xmath35 analysis of the model grid found these best fit values : t@xmath29 = 5100 k , [ fe / h ] = @xmath20.125 , and [ c / fe ] = @xmath21.0 . gk per is fainter than our other two targets so the co region is very noisy , and thus the measurement of [ c / fe ] for gk per is slightly less certain than found for the other two targets . it is interesting to note that the h i absorption of the underlying secondary star is sufficient to create the appearance of no h i br@xmath18 emission at the center of this feature . the spex spectrum of gk per , fig . [ gkperirtf ] , is even noisier than the nirspec data . clearly , however , the same model does an excellent job at fitting the observations . as demonstrated above , we are easily able to reproduce the spectra of objects with known parameters . our examination of k stars in the irtf spectral library shows that if we know the value of [ fe / h ] , we can derive values of t@xmath29 , or vice versa , that are correct to within the published error bars for that object . to examine how well we can determine t@xmath29 or [ fe / h ] if we do not know either value , we present a @xmath35 analysis for the irtf template hd36003 . the heat map for the spectral region 2.18 @xmath9 @xmath26 @xmath9 2.37 @xmath15 m of this star is shown in fig . [ k4vhm ] . while the models with parameters similar to the published values for both t@xmath29 ( 4615 @xmath40 29 k ) and [ fe / h ] ( @xmath20.14 @xmath40 0.08 ) do have low values of @xmath35 , there is a range of solutions with quantitatively similar fits to the data . as demonstrated in the plots shown in figs . [ k0tok3 ] and [ k4tok7 ] , for k dwarfs , the strong na i doublet ( at 2.209 @xmath15 m ) , the ca i triplet ( at 2.26 @xmath15 m ) , and the co features all slowly get stronger as we decrease temperature . thus , models can mimic the observed spectrum by either an enhanced abundance of [ fe / h ] and a hotter temperature , or a reduced value of [ fe / h ] and a lower temperature . our @xmath35 analysis over such a large span in wavelength is certainly also affected by missing transitions for weak lines , the s / n of the data , and for this lower resolution spectrum , the continuum subtraction process . the red end of the @xmath1-band is filled with strong telluric features , and even for high s / n data , small discrepancies can appear due to a slight mis - match of the telluric standard with the program object . this is especially clear for the co features , as some bandheads in a particular spectrum are well fitted by the models , while others are not . given these results , if we are able to constrain the limits on the temperature of the object , such as `` the secondary star in ss cyg has a spectral type near k5 '' , and not expect super - solar metallicities , we find that temperatures derived from these data are good to @xmath40 250 k , and [ fe / h ] is good to @xmath40 0.25 . moderate resolution data that covered either the na i doublet or ca i triplet would almost certainly lead to more precise values of both quantities . putting error bars on our values for [ c / fe ] is more difficult in that none of our templates are known to have unusual values for this parameter . it is clear that our models reproduce the co features in the template spectra over a large range in metallicity . thus , altering just the abundance of carbon should not introduce any significant issues , as it simply acts to reduce the strength of the co features to mimic those seen in lower metallicity stars . how a reduced carbon abundance affects the input stellar atmosphere is difficult to assess given the unknown evolutionary state of the cv secondary stars . the presence of more than one co bandhead in all of the spectra also allows us to have more confidence in a particular value of [ c / fe ] . for the higher s / n spectra , we expect that the precision of the values for [ c / fe ] are similar in scale to [ fe / h ] : @xmath40 0.25 . for gk per the data are quite poor compared to the other two cvs , and the derived value for [ c / fe ] is less certain . it is obvious , however , that the value of [ c / fe ] is lower in gk per than in the other two sources . this result will be amplified if the gravity of gk per is significantly lower than our input value of log @xmath25 = 4.0 . we have obtained moderate resolution @xmath1-band spectroscopy of three cvs that were previously noted to have weaker than expected co features : ss cyg , ru peg , and gk per . because those earlier data were obtained at lower resolution , r @xmath0 2,000 , questions were raised about the possibility of `` veiling '' of the co features to make them appear weaker . while we show below that this argument has no validity if realistic veiling scenarios are examined , it is the increased dispersion of the spectra obtained with nirspec that easily argues against such a scenario . the nirspec data have a dispersion of 0.32 / pix , nearly 1/17 that of the spex data . thus , the flux per pixel from any veiling component would be diminished by this factor . model spectra fitted to the two different sets of data would give different values for the strength of the co features if there was some type of veiling confined to the co region . to provide quantitative estimates of the relative carbon abundances for cvs we have altered moog to allow us to model the entire @xmath1-band , and developed a software package that constructs large grids of synthetic spectra , and then searches these grids to find the best fitting solution to the observed data . we specifically allowed for the abundance of carbon to be a separate input under the assumption that the @xmath13c abundance has been changed in the initial branches of the cno cycle , as argued in harrison et al . obviously , weak co features could be explained by a deficit of oxygen , but a process that could cause such a deficit is not obvious . with this software we derived values of t@xmath29 , [ fe / h ] , and [ c / fe ] from the nirspec spectra for the three program objects . we list these results in table 3 . except for the deficits of carbon , no other abundance anomalies are apparent , and the secondary stars of all three objects have solar , or slightly sub - solar abundances . the total @xmath13c abundance for ss cyg and ru peg are similar , @xmath0 25% of solar , while for gk per it is @xmath0 10% of solar . if these peculiar values are the result of the cno cycle ( c.f . , marks & sarna 1998 ) , than the abundance of @xmath46c should be enhanced , allowing for the detection of the bandheads of @xmath46co . the two strongest such bandheads with @xmath47 2.4 @xmath15 m are @xmath46co@xmath14 at 2.345 @xmath15 m , and @xmath46co@xmath48 at 2.374 @xmath15 m . the first of these is not covered by our nirspec data , but dhillon et al . ( 2002 ) present a @xmath1-band spectrum of ss cyg which appears to show a strong @xmath46co@xmath14 absorption feature . they attribute this feature to metal line absorption in star spots as indicated by anomalously strong na i absorption features ( at 2.3355 and 2.3386 @xmath15 m ) in their spectra . these two na i lines are not anomalous in our spex data , nor is there a @xmath46co@xmath14 feature of the strength observed by dhillon et al . the second of the @xmath46co features is covered by our nirspec observations , but there is a deep telluric feature at this wavelength that makes good correction quite difficult , and results in a noisy portion of the second order spectrum . even with this issue , there is certainly no sign of a strong absorption feature at this location in either ss cyg or ru peg . the spex data covers both features , and while there are hints of both of these bandheads in the data for ss cyg and ru peg , the spectra are simply too noisy to draw any firm conclusions . new , higher s / n moderate resolution spectroscopy will be required to properly investigate the @xmath13c/@xmath46c ratio . harrison et al . ( 2004 ) found that the @xmath1-band continua of many long period cvs were flatter than expected if the secondary star was the sole source of emission in that bandpass . to more closely examine the slope of the continuum of ss cyg , we compare the full @xmath1-band spectrum of ss cyg with that of the irtf template star that has the most similar temperature : hd45977 . in fig . [ sscygcomp ] , we subtract the spectrum of hd45977 from that of ss cyg , both spectra having been normalized at 2.2 @xmath15 m . the result is a residual spectrum that is fairly flat , with f@xmath49 @xmath50 @xmath51 . given the uncertainties in the temperatures of the two objects , and the differing sources of the data , such a flat spectrum is consistent with free - free emission . the continuum subtraction process step required to allow us to directly compare the spex data to the synthetic spectra easily removes a weak continuum source such as this , and this is why the results for the nirspec and spex are simultaneously consistent with the same model . we can also attempt to model the contribution of line emission sources that might preferentially veil the co features . there are only two possible sources that we can envision that might do this : the h i pfund continuum , and co emission . as shown in fig . [ sscygcomp ] , the h i br@xmath18 emission line in ss cyg is quite strong , so the pfund series of hydrogen will also be present . the pfund series limit is at @xmath262.279 @xmath15 m , and the transitions pf23 and higher , will fall in our modeling bandpass . the emissivities of these lines are very small ; hummer & storey ( 1987 ) list them as being @xmath9 1.7% that of br@xmath18 ( for `` case b '' conditions ) . fitting the br@xmath18 line with a gaussian profile gives fwhm = 73 . we will assume all of the h i lines have this profile . in fig . [ sscygpfcomp ] , we present spectra where we added a rotationally broadened spectrum of the pfund series ( up to pf100 ) to the k4v spectral template , and compare it to the spectrum of ss cyg . given their low emissivities , the effect of the h i lines is not detectable . we also artificially multiplied the emissivities of the pfund lines by factors 10 and 100 and added them to the k4v template . only at very large multiplicative factors can their presence be detected , and even then , they add a smooth continuum to the co region , leaving the absorption features relatively undisturbed , but producing a highly distorted continuum . even with this simplistic model , it is clear that h i pfund emission can not provide the veiling necessary to explain weak co features . the detection of co emission in wz sge ( howell et al . 2004 ) has led to the suggestion that co emission is the source of the veiling needed to produce weaker than expected co features seen in the program cvs . since the co emission must come from the accretion disk , a similar result as that for the pfund continuum emission attains . as discussed in scoville et al . ( 1980 ) , such emission is expected to be confined to regions where t @xmath52 3000 k , and where the densities are high , @xmath53 @xmath54 10@xmath55 @xmath56 . since ss cyg was in a minimum during our observations , presumably these conditions exist somewhere within its accretion disk . as shown in bik et al . ( 2006 ) , optically thin co emission features are essentially the inverse of the co absorption features seen in late type stars . this similarity allows us to construct crude models to investigate what co emission might look like if its origin was in a cv accretion disk . if we assign the co emission to the disk , then the broadening of any spectral feature located there will be much greater than that of the slower rotational broadening of the secondary star ( 89 km s@xmath12 in the case of ss cyg ) . for example , if the accretion disk extends to 75% of r@xmath57 ( the roche lobe radius of the white dwarf ) , using the stellar parameters for ss cyg in bitner et al . ( 2007 ) , the keplerian velocity at this radius will be @xmath0 400 km s@xmath12 . in fig . [ sscygcocomp ] , we add a rotationally broadened co spectrum to the best fitting synthetic spectrum for ss cyg using the value for the h i br@xmath18 line ( fwhm = 73 ) , and a co emission spectrum broadened by half that value . as could be expected , the result is a dramatic change in the profiles of the co features , with an emission peak preceding each bandhead , a subtle redward shift for the location of the strongest absorption , and a dramatic narrowing of the co bandhead profiles . obviously , the data for none of our objects resembles this result . more complicated scenarios for the emission profile could be constructed , but to truly diminish the co features without distorting the resulting spectrum _ requires _ the addition of co emission with a broadening profile that is very similar to that of the secondary star . there is no other location in a cv system besides the secondary star photosphere where such low velocities occur . we have modified the spectral synthesis program moog and have demonstrated that we are able to model moderate and lower resolution @xmath1-band spectra for stars hotter than t@xmath29 @xmath54 4000 k. we then used this program to investigate such spectra for three cvs : ss cyg , ru peg , and gk per . it is clear that all three cvs in this sample have subsolar carbon abundances . that synthetic spectra with identical parameters simultaneously model data with dramatically different dispersions for each of the objects , and realistic co veiling scenarios fail to reproduce the observed co features , proves that the carbon deficits are real . it is important to note that these results represent the first direct measurements of abundances in the photosphere of the mass donor stars in cvs . while our determinations of t@xmath58 , [ fe / h ] , and [ c / fe ] for these three objects are not overly precise , they have no parallel . there have not been many predictions for the behavior of the abundances in the atmospheres of cv donor stars as a function of age / evolutionary state . marks & sarna ( 1998 ) explored how the photospheric abundances of cno elements in cv secondaries might evolve with time , including the possibilities of pollution by the common envelope phase , or through the accretion of classical novae ejecta . they found that the latter two scenarios were inadequate in producing observable changes , and concluded that only pre - contact evolution could significantly alter the cno abundances and isotopic ratios in cv secondary star photospheres . schenker et al . ( 2002 ) examined how cvs might evolve from supersoft binaries and , if so , could show dramatic changes in cno species . in light of our results , it would be useful to revisit this research with newer generations of binary star evolution codes , such as starevol ( stancliffe & eldridge 2009 ) . it is also obvious that moderate resolution spectroscopy of the brightest cvs covering the _ entire _ @xmath1-band are required to achieve more robust measures of [ fe / h ] , as well as allow for the proper examination of the co bands . if the deficits of carbon arise from the cno cycle , than the isotopic abundances of carbon will be altered . moderate resolution @xmath1-band spectroscopy covering the main @xmath46co features will allow for the confirmation of this inference . both teh and rth were partially supported by a grant from the nsf ( ast-1209451 ) . we acknowledge with thanks the variable star observations from the aavso international database contributed by observers worldwide and used in this research . allard , f. , homeier , d. , & freytag , b. 2011 , aspc , 448 , 91 + alves - brito , a. , melendez , j. , asplund , m. , ramirez , i. , et al . 2010 , a&a , 513 , 35 + baron , e. , chen , b. , & hauschildt , p. h. 2009 , in aip conf . , vol . 1171 , american institute of physics conference series , ed . i. hubeny , j. m. stone , k. macgregor , & k. werner , 148160 + bitner , m. a. , robinson , e. l. , & behr , b. b. 2007 , apj , 662 , 564 + bonifacio , p. , caffau , e. , ludwig , h .- , & steffen , m. 2012 , iaus 282 , 213 + cushing , m. c. , rayner , j. t. , & vacca , w. d. 2005 , apj , 623 , 1115 + cushing , m. , vacca , w. d. , & rayner , j. t. 2004 , pasp , 116 , 362 + dhillon , v. s. , littlefair , s. p. , marsh , t. r. , sarna , m. j. , & boakes , e. h. 2002 , a&a , 393 , 611 + dunford , a. , watson , c. a. , & smith , r. c. 2012 , mnras , 422 , 3444 + duquennoy , a. , tokovinin , a. a. , leinert , ch . , glindemann , et al . 1996 , a&a , 314 , 846 + friend , m. t. , martin , j. s. , connon - smith , r. , & jones , d. h. p. 1990 , mnras , 246 , 654 + goorvitch , d. 1994 , apjs , 95 , 535 + gray , d. f. , the observation and analysis of stellar photospheres ( cambridge : cambridge univ . press ) , 374 + gray , r. o. , & corbally , c. j. 1994 , aj , 107 , 742 + grevesse , n. , asplund , m. , & sauval , a. j. 2007 , space sci . , 130 , 105 + gustafsson , b. , bell , r. a. , eriksson , k. , & nordlund , a. 1975 , a&a , 42 , 407 + gustafsson , b. , edvardsson , b. , eriksson , k. , j@xmath59rgensen , u. g. , nordlund , a. , & plez , b. 2008 , a&a , 486 , 951 + hamilton , r. t. 2013 , phd thesis , new mexico state university + hamilton , r. t. , harrison , t. e. tappert , c. , & howell , s. b. 2011 , apj , 728 , 16 + harrison , t. e. , bornak , j. , mcarthur , b. e. , & benedict , g. f. 2013 , apj , 767 , 7 + harrison , t. e. , howell , s. b. , szkody , p. , & cordova , f. a. 2007a , aj , 133 , 162 + harrison , t. e. , campbell , r. k. , howell , s. b. , cordova , f. a. , & schwope , a. d. 2007b , apj , 656 , 444 + harrison , t. e. , osborne , h. l. , & howell , s. b. 2005 , aj , 129 , 2400 + harrison , t. e. , osborne , h. l. , & howell , s. b. 2004 , aj , 127 , 3493 + hauschildt , p. h. , & baron , e. 2010 , a&a , 509 , 36 + hauschildt , p. h. , allard , f. , ferguson , j. , baron , e. , & alexander , d. r. 1999 , apj , 525 , 871 + howell , s. b. , harrison , t. e. , & szkody , p. 2004 , apj , 602 , l49 + hummer , d. g. , & storey , p. j. 1987 , mnras , 224 , 801 + kraft , r. r. 1964 , apj , 139 , 457 + kraft , r. p. 1962 , apj , 135 , 408 + ludwig , h. -g . , caffau , e. , steffen , m. , freytag , b. , et al . 2009 , mmsai , 80 , 711 + magic , z. , collett , r. , hayek , w. , & asplund , m. 2013 , a&a , 560 , 8 + magic , z. , collett , r. , asplund , m. , trampedach , r. , et al . 2013 , a&a , 557 , 26 + marks , p. b. , & sarna , m. j. 1998 , mnras , 301 , 699 + martnez - arniz , r. , maldonado , j. , montes , d. , eiroa , c. , & montesinos , b. 2010 , a&a , 520 , 79 + mszros , sz . , allende prieto , c. , edvardsson , b. , castelli , f. , et al . 2012 , aj , 144 , 120 + morales - reuda , l. , still , m. d. , roche , p. , wood , j. h. , & lockley , j. j. 2002 , mnras , 329 , 597 + politano , m. & weiler , k. p. 2007 , apj , 665 , 663 + reddy , r. r. , & viswanath , r. 1990 , journal of astrophysics and astronomy , 11 , 67 + sbordone , l. , bonifacio , p. , castelli , f. , & kurucz , r. l. 2004 , memorie della societa astronomica italiana supplementi , 5 , 93 + scoville , n. z. , krotkov , r. , & wang , d. 1980 , apj , 240 , 929 + schenker , k. , king , a. r. , kolb , u. , wynn , g. a. , & zhang , z. 2002 , mnras , 337 , 1105 + sion , e. m. , cheng , f. , godon , p. , urban , j. a. , & szkody , p. 2004a , aj , 128 , 1834 + sneden , c. a. 1973 , phd thesis , university of texas + soubiran , c. , le campion , j. -f . , cayrel de strobel , g. , & caillo , a. 2010 , a&a , 515 , 111 + sousa , s. g. , santos , n. c. , israelian , g. , mayor , m. , et al . 2011 , a&a , 533 , 141 + stancliffe , r. j. , & eldridge , j. j. 2009 , mnras , 396 , 1699 + verbunt , f. & zwaan , c. 1981 , a&a , 100 , 7 + wallace , k. , & hinkle , k. 1996 , apjs , 107 , 312 + wallace , k. , livingston , w. , hinkle , k. , & bernath , p. 1996 , apjs , 106 , 165 + warner , b. 1995 , cataclysmic variable stars ( cambridge : cambridge univ . press , 443 + lccccc ss cyg & nirspec & 2004 aug . 28 & 12:31:51 & 4 @xmath60 300 & 0.20 + ru peg & nirspec & `` & 13:17:12 & 4 @xmath60 300 & 0.87 + gk per & nirspec & '' & 14:20:24 & 6 @xmath60 300 & 0.46 + @xmath18 psc & nirspec & `` & 13:45:17 & 8 @xmath60 1 & + @xmath17 eri & nirspec & '' & 15:06:18 & 24 @xmath60 1 & + ss cyg & spex & 2004 aug . 15 & 08:55:17 & 8 @xmath60 180 & 0.40 + ru peg & spex & `` & 10:25:06 & 8 @xmath60 240 & 0.85 + gk per & spex & '' & 13:53:54 & 6 @xmath60 240 & 0.94 + lccccc sun & g2v & 5777 & 4.44 & 0.0 & + arcturus & k0iii & 4313 @xmath40 84 & 1.65 @xmath40 0.30 & @xmath20.54 @xmath40 0.10 & 34/31/31 + @xmath17 eri & k2v & 5088 @xmath40 72 & 4.54 @xmath40 0.16 & @xmath20.09 @xmath40 0.09 & 26/24/24 + @xmath18 psc & g9iii & 4853 @xmath40 45 & 2.59 @xmath40 0.26 & @xmath20.46 @xmath40 0.12 & 11/8/8 + hd145675 & k0v & 5320 @xmath40 114 & 4.45 @xmath40 0.07 & @xmath270.41 @xmath40 0.12 & 18/15/15 + hd10476 & k1v & 5189 @xmath40 53 & 4.46 @xmath40 0.12 & @xmath20.06 @xmath40 0.06 & 16/10/10 + hd3765 & k2v & 5023 @xmath40 66 & 4.53 @xmath40 0.16 & @xmath270.05 @xmath40 0.10 & 7/4/4 + hd219134 & k3v & 4837 @xmath40 138 & 4.51 @xmath40 0.13 & @xmath270.05 @xmath40 0.10 & 15/10/10 + hd45977 & k4v & 4689 @xmath40 174 & 4.30 @xmath40 0.39 & @xmath270.03 @xmath40 0.18 & 1/1/1 + hd36003 & k5v & 4615 @xmath40 29 & 4.35 @xmath40 0.06 & @xmath20.14 @xmath40 0.08 & 3/2/2 + hd201092 & k7v & 3964 @xmath40 175 & 4.50 @xmath40 0.18 & @xmath20.26 @xmath40 0.27 & 10/5/5 + lcccc ss cyg & 4700 @xmath40 250 & 4.50 & @xmath20.25 @xmath61 0.25 & @xmath20.50 @xmath40 0.25 + ru peg & 4700 @xmath40 250 & 4.50 & @xmath270.00 @xmath40 0.25 & @xmath20.75 @xmath61 0.25 + gk per & 5100 @xmath40 250 & 4.00 & @xmath20.125 @xmath40 0.25 & @xmath21.00 @xmath40 0.50 + eri ( black solid line ) . the synthetic model spectrum ( green , dashed line ) generated for this object is overplotted . for the purposes of this paper , the bottom panel will be defined as the second order , while the top panel will be labeled the sixth order . the synthetic spectrum has been rotationally broaded by 4 km s@xmath12 as measured by martinez - arnaiz et al . the s / n ratio ranged from 214 in the sixth order , to 95 in the second order.,title="fig:",width=566 ] m are not especially well matched by the models . the source of this discrepancy is hard to identify . in the top panel we also plot in red the spectrum of a g9v star ( hd161198 ) that we observed with spex during the 2004 august observing run , and the model spectrum generated for the k0v template fits the spectrum of hd161198 quite well.,title="fig:",width=566 ] heat map for the order 6 spectral region for the nirspec spectrum of ss cyg . in this , and all subsequent heat maps , blue denotes @xmath62 @xmath63 0.7 , green is 0.7 @xmath9 @xmath62 @xmath63 0.9 , yellow is 0.9 @xmath9 @xmath62 @xmath63 1.5 , magenta is 1.5 @xmath9 @xmath62 @xmath63 2.5 , and red is @xmath62 @xmath54 2.5 . , title="fig:",width=566 ] heat map for the order 3 spectral region for the nirspec spectrum of ss cyg . for this analysis , a grid of models with the metallicity fixed to [ fe / h ] = @xmath20.25 was constructed , while the carbon abundance was altered over the range @xmath21.0 @xmath9 [ c / fe ] @xmath9 @xmath270.25 . , title="fig:",width=566 ] heat map for the model grid fits to the third order spectrum of ru peg . like that for ss cyg , a grid of single metallicity models ( here with [ fe / h ] = 0.0 ) were generated with only the carbon abundance altered for this analysis.,title="fig:",width=566 ] analysis of the irtf spectral template hd36003 for a large grid of model spectra . the mean of the published values for this star , see table 2 , are t@xmath29 = 4550 k , and [ fe / h ] = @xmath20.17 . the grid has temperature intervals of 100 k , and [ fe / h ] stepped by @xmath400.125.,title="fig:",width=491 ] line of ss cyg . the spectrum below that has had the emissivities of the pfund lines increased by a factor of 10 . the bottom spectrum has the pfund line emissivity increased by a factor of 100.,title="fig:",width=491 ] line , added to the best fitting ( solar abundance ) synthetic spectrum . the bottom spectrum is the result of the identical process , except the velocity broadening was one half that of br @xmath18 profile . the co emission component was normalized so that when it was added to the model spectrum , the depth of the minima in the co features of ss cyg were reproduced . dashed vertical lines indicate the wavelengths of the @xmath13co@xmath65 ( left ) and @xmath13co@xmath66 ( right ) bandheads.,title="fig:",width=642 ] Abstract:
[ "we use a modified version of moog to generate large grids of synthetic spectra in an attempt to derive quantitative abundances for three cvs ( gk per , ru peg , and ss cyg ) by comparing the models to moderate resolution ( r @xmath0 25,000 ) @xmath1-band spectra obtained with nirspec on keck . for each of the three systems we find solar , or slightly sub - solar values for [ fe / h ] , but significant deficits of carbon : for ss cyg we find [ c / fe ] = @xmath20.50 , for ru peg [ c / fe ] = @xmath20.75 , and for gk per [ c / fe ] = @xmath21.00 . we show that it is possible to use lower resolution ( r @xmath0 2,000 ) spectra to quantify carbon deficits . we examine realistic veiling scenarios and find that emission from h i or co can not reproduce the observations . _ key words : _ infrared : stars stars : cataclysmic variables stars : individual ( ss cyg , ru peg , gk per ) stars : abundances @xmath3 visiting observer , w. m. keck observatory , which is operated as a scientific partnership among the california institute of technology , the university of california , and the national aeronautics and space administration . + @xmath4 visiting astronomer at the infrared telescope facility , which is operated by the university of hawaii under contract from nasa ." ]
12,057
12,057
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in this paper we present an attempt to formalize what may be called a _ string field theory ( sft ) _ for ( closed ) topological strings with hodge property . from the very first days of string theory it was considered as a kind of generalization of the perturbative expansion of the quantum field theory in the ( functional ) integral representation . the space of graphs with @xmath0 loops with metrics on edges ( schwinger proper times ) was generalized to moduli space of riemann surfaces . indeed , the latter space really looks like a principle @xmath1 bundle over the former space near the points of maximal degeneracy ( i.e. , where maximal number of handles are pinched ) . a natural question is whether there are special string theories that degenerate exactly to quantum field theories ( may be , of the special kind ) . would it happen such theories should enjoy both finiteness of string theory and ( functional ) integral description of quantum field theory . one of the first attempts to construct a theory of this type was done by zwiebach in @xcite . he divided the moduli space into two regions : the internal piece and the boundary . he observed that surfaces representing the boundary region may be constructed from those representing the internal piece by gluing them with the help of cylinders ( with flat metric ) . therefore , he proposed to take integrals over the moduli spaces in two steps : first , to take an integral over the internal pieces , such that this would produce vertices , and then take an integral along metrics on cylinders , that would exactly reproduce integral along the schwinger parameters on graphs in qft prescription . in this approach , he came with the infinite number of vertices of different internal genera and with different number of external legs . however , he observed that such vertices satisfy quadratic relations that where a quantum version of some infinity - structure . at that time community of theoretical physicists seemed not to be impressed by the lagrangian with infinite number of ( almost uncomputable ) vertices . the next attempt was done by witten @xcite . he assumed that in topological string theories there may be a limit in the space of two - dimensional theories such that the measure of integration goes to the vicinity of the points of maximal degeneration . in the type b theories such limit seems to be the large volume limit of the target space ; this motivated witten s chern - simons - like representation for the topological string theory . this approach was further developed by bershadsky , cecotti , ooguri , and vafa in @xcite . we note that the tropical limit of gromov - witten theory @xcite ( type a topological strings ) seems to realize the same qft degeneration of string theory . indeed , the tropical limit of a riemann surface mapped to a toric variety is represented by the graph mapped to the moment map domain . in the development of topological string theory it became clear that the proper object is not just a measure on the moduli space of complex structures of riemann surfaces , but rather a differential form on this space . in original formulation these differential forms were assigned to the tensor algebra of cohomology of some complex ; such objects are called gromov - witten invariants . we say that gromov - witten invariants are qft - like if the differential forms of non - zero degree have support only in a vicinity of the points of maximal degeneration . we generalized the definition of gromov - witten invariants in @xcite by lifting it from the cohomology of a complex to the full complex . such generalization involved enlargement of the moduli space from deligne - mumford space to kimura - stasheff - voronov space @xcite , and we called it zwiebach invariants ( in fact , some pieces of this construction appeared earlier in @xcite and @xcite ) . the complex of states involved in the definition of zwiebach invariants is a bicomplex due to the action of the second differential . the second differential represents the substitution of a special vector field corresponding to the constant rotation of the phase of the local coordinate at a marked point into differential forms on the kimura - stasheff - voronov space . once we have some zwiebach invariants , it is possible to produce new zwiebach invariants by contraction of an acyclic hodge sub - bicomplex . in fact , it is one of the main properties of zwiebach invariants . consider a sub - bicomplex , where these two differentials act freely . we call it hodge contractible bicomplex . the operation of contraction of a hodge contractible bicomplex turns zwiebach invariants into induced zwiebach invariants on the coset with respect to contactible bicomplex . induced zwiebach invariants are differential forms whose support is a union of the support of the initial zwiebach invariants and small neighbourhoods of the points of maximal degeneration . this procedure is a generalization from intervals to cylinders of the procedure of induction of @xmath2-structures , see e. g. @xcite . this way we can obtain qft - like gromov - witten invariants . we just should start with zwiebach invariants that have ( in some suitable sense ) no support inside the kimura - stasheff - voronov spaces . in fact , it is even enough to consider a weaker condition , motivated by applications . that is , usually people consider the integrals of gromov - witten invarians only over the tautological classes in the moduli space of curves . so , we call a set of zwiebach invariants vertex - like if the integral over the kimura - stasheff - voronov spaces of any their non - zero component multipled by the pullback ( from the deligne - mumford space ) of any tautological class vanishes . consider vertex - like zwiebach invariants . assume we contract a hodge contractible bicomplex down to cohomology . we obtain differential forms on the deligne - mumford space , such that the integral of the product of any such form of non - zero degree with any tautological class vanishes the interior of the moduli space . integrals of such forms over the moduli spaces turn out to be sums over graphs ( corresponding to degenerate riemann surfaces ) . they resemble feynman diagramms , and generation function for the integral over moduli spaces resemble diagrammatic expansion of perturbative quantum field theory . in this paper , we do nt construct examples of vertex - like zwiebach invariants ( we are going to do this explicitly in a future publication , as well as the corresponding theory for the spaces introduced in @xcite ) . rather we conjecture that they exist and study the consequences of this assumption . we call the emerging construction the _ hodge field theory _ , and now we will explain it in some detail . first of all , degree zero parts of vertex - like zwiebach invariants induce the structure of homotopy cyclic hodge algebra on the target complex @xcite . we remind that a cyclic hodge algebra is just a hodge dgbv - algebra with one additional axiom ( @xmath3-axiom , see below ) . in fact , this structure is interesting by itself , without any reference to zwiebach invariants . it has first appeared in the paper of barannikov and kontsevich @xcite ; it captures the properties of polyvector fields on calabi - yau manifolds . more examples of dgbv algebras are studied in @xcite and @xcite . it is possible to understand the structure of dgbv - algebra as a natural generalization of the algebraic structure studied in @xcite . in the hodge field theory construction we consider only a particular case , where we obtain axioms of of a cyclic hodge algebra itself , not up to homotopy . we are aware of the fact that demanding existance of vertex - like zwiebach invariants simultaneously with vanishing homotopy piece of cyclic hodge algebra conditions may be too restrictive , and while considering only those relations that lead to axioms of cyclic hodge algebra may be too weak , however we proceed . in the hodge field theory construction we define graph expressions for the analogues of gromov - witten invariants multiplied by tautological classes using _ only cyclic hodge algebra data_. we call them hodge field theory correlators . the corresponding action of the hodge field theory is written down explicitely in section [ action ] . our main result is the proof that the hodge field theory correlators satisfy all universal equations that follow from relations among tautological classes in cohomology . the first result of this kind is due to barannikov and kontsevich . they have noticed that there is a solution of the wdvv equation that is associated to a dgbv - algebra ( this solution is the critical value of the bcov action @xcite , see ( * ? ? ? * appendix ) and ( * ? ? ? * appendix ) ) . later , we reproved this in @xcite . then , in @xcite we proved some other low - genera universal equations . here we generalize all these result and put all calculations done before in a proper framework . in particular , the main problem for us was to define a graph expression in tensors of a cyclic hodge algebra that corresponds to the full gromov - witten potential with descendants . the first steps were done in @xcite , where we introduced the definition of descendants at one point in hodge field theory ( mostly for combinatorial reasons ) . but then we observed that it is a part of a natural definition of potential with descendants in cyclic hodge algebras that appears as a special case of degeneration of vertex - like zwiebach invariants multiplied by tautological classes . in this paper , we present and study this construction . we prove in a completely algebraic way that hodge field theory correlators satisfy the same equations as a gromov - witten potential : string , dilaton , and the whole system of pdes coming from tautological relations in the cohomology of the moduli space of curves ( see also @xcite for some preliminary results ) . in what follows we will not only present the proof but also will do our best relating algebraic definitions and statements on hodge field theory to analoguous constructions and theorems in the theory of zwiebach invariants . in section [ sec - gw ] we remind all necessary facts about the axiomatic gromov - witten theory . in section [ sec - z ] we define zwiebach invariants and explain the motivation to consider the sums over graphs in cyclic hodge algebras . in section [ sec - defpot ] we define cyclic hodge algebras and the corresponding descendant potential . in section [ sec - proper ] we state the main properties of the descendant potential in cyclic hodge algebras , and the rest of the paper is devoted to the proofs . a.l . was supported by the russian federal agency of atomic energy and by the grants intas-03 - 51 - 6346 , nsh-8065.2006.2 , nwo - rfbr-047.011.2004.026 ( rfbr-05 - 02 - 89000-nwo - a ) , and rfbr-07 - 02 - 01161-a . s.s . was supported by the grant snsf-200021 - 115907/1 . s.s . is grateful to the participants of the moduli spaces program at the mittag - leffler institute ( djursholm , sweden ) for the fruitful discussions of the preliminary versions of the results of this paper . the remarks of c. faber , o. tommasi , and d. zvonkine were especially helpful . i.s . was supported by the grant rfbr-06 - 01 - 00037 . in this section we remind what is gromov - witten theory and explain its basic properties that we are going to reproduce in hodge field theory construction . let us fix a finite dimensional vector space @xmath4 over @xmath5 together with the choice of a homogeneous basis @xmath6 and a non - degenerate scalar product @xmath7 on it . let @xmath8 be a distinguished even element of the basis . consider the moduli spaces of curves @xmath9 . on each @xmath9 we take a differential form @xmath10 of mixed degree with values in @xmath11 . the whole system of forms @xmath12 is called _ gromov - witten invariants _ , if it satisfies the axioms @xcite : 1 . there are two actions of the symmetric group @xmath13 on @xmath10 . first , we can relabel the marked points on curves in @xmath9 ; second , we can interchange the factors in the tensor product @xmath11 . we require that @xmath10 is equivariant with respect to these two actions of @xmath13 . in other words , one can think that each copy of @xmath4 in the tensor product is assigned to a specific marked point on curves in @xmath9 . the forms must be closed , @xmath14 . 3 . [ pull - back ] consider the mapping @xmath15 forgetting the last marked point . then the correspondence between @xmath10 and @xmath16 is given by the formula @xmath17 the meaning of the right hand side is the following . we want to turn a @xmath18-valued form into a @xmath11-valued one . so , we take the copy of @xmath4 corresponding to the last marked point and contract it with the vector @xmath8 using the scalar product . [ factor ] consider an irreducible boundary divisor in @xmath9 , whose generic point is represented by a two - component curve . it is the image of a natural mapping @xmath19 , where @xmath20 and @xmath21 . we require that @xmath22 here on the right hand side we contract with a scalar product the two copies of @xmath4 that correspond to the node . + in the same way , consider the divisor of genus @xmath23 curves with one self - intersection . it is the image of a natural mapping @xmath24 . in this case , we require that @xmath25 as before , we contract two copies of @xmath4 corresponding to the node . 5 . we also assume that @xmath26 . let us associate to each @xmath27 the set of formal variables @xmath28 , @xmath29 . by @xmath30 denote the formal power series in these variables defined as @xmath31 the first sum is taken over @xmath32 for @xmath33 , @xmath34 for @xmath35 , and @xmath36 for @xmath37 . on the right hand side , we contract each copy of @xmath4 with the factor of the tensor product associated to the same marked point . the formal power series @xmath38 is called gromov - witten potential associated to the system of gromov - witten invariants @xmath12 . the coefficients of @xmath30 , @xmath39 , are called correlators and denoted by @xmath40 vectors @xmath41 are called primary fields . the main properties of gw potentials come from geometry of the moduli space of curves . first , one can prove that coefficients of @xmath42 satisfy string and dilaton equations : @xmath43 the string equation is a corollary of the fact that @xmath44 ; here @xmath15 is the projection forgetting the last marked point and @xmath45 is the divisor in @xmath46 whose generic point is represented by a two - component curve with one node such that one component has genus @xmath47 and contains exactly two marked points , the @xmath48-th and the @xmath49-th ones . it is assumed that @xmath50 . the dilaton equation is a corollary of the fact that , in the same notations , @xmath51 . of course , we assume that @xmath52 . second , any relation in the cohomology of @xmath9 among natural @xmath53-@xmath54-strata gives a relation for the correlators . let us explain this in more detail . the moduli space of curves @xmath9 @xcite has a natural stratification by the topological type of stable curves . we can combine natural strata with @xmath53-classes at marked points and at nodes and @xmath54-classes on the moduli spaces of irreducible components . these objects are called @xmath53-@xmath54-strata . a convenient way to describe a @xmath53-@xmath54-stratum in @xmath9 is the language of stable dual graphs . take a generic curve in the stratum . to each irreducible component we associate a vertex marked by its genus . to each node we associate an edge connecting the corresponding vertices ( or a loop , if it is a double point of an irreducible curve ) . if there is a marked point on a component , then we add a leaf at the corresponding vertex , and we label leaves in the same way as marked points . if we multiply a stratum by some @xmath53-classes , then we just mark the corresponding leaves or half - edges ( in the case when we add @xmath53-classes at nodes ) by the corresponding powers of @xmath53 . also we mark each vertex by the @xmath54-class associated to it . let us remark that by @xmath54-classes on @xmath9 we mean the classes @xmath55 where @xmath56 is the projections forgetting the last @xmath57 marked points . it is just another additive basis in the ring generated by the ordinary @xmath54-classes ( @xmath58 , @xmath59 , in our notations ) . the basic properties of these classes are stated in @xcite . using the properties of gw invariants , one can express the integral of @xmath10 over a @xmath53-@xmath54-stratum @xmath60 in terms of correlators . consider a special case , when @xmath60 is represented by a two - vertex graph with no @xmath53- and @xmath54-classes . then , according to axiom [ factor ] , the integral of @xmath10 is the product of integrals of @xmath61 and @xmath62 over the moduli spaces corresponding to the vertices , contracted by the scalar product : @xmath63 here we assume that the genus of one component of a generic curve in @xmath60 is @xmath64 and @xmath65 marked points with labels @xmath66 , @xmath67 , are on this component . the other component has genus @xmath68 and @xmath69 marked points with labels @xmath70 , @xmath71 , lie on it . of course , @xmath72 , @xmath73 . now consider a special case , when @xmath60 is represented by a one - vertex graph with @xmath53- and @xmath54-classes . let us assign a vector in the basis of @xmath4 to each leaf ( to each marked point ) . then , according to axiom [ pull - back ] the integral @xmath74 is equal to @xmath75 combining these two special cases one can obtain an expression in correlators that corresponds to an arbitrary @xmath53-@xmath54-stratum . suppose that we have a linear combination @xmath76 of @xmath53-@xmath54-strata that is equal to @xmath47 in the cohomology of @xmath9 ( a tautological relation ) . since @xmath14 , the integral of @xmath77 over @xmath76 is equal to zero , for an arbitrary choice of primary fields . this gives an equation for correlators . usually , one consider also the pull - backs of @xmath76 to @xmath78 , @xmath79 , multiplied by arbitrary monomials of @xmath53-classes . of course , they are also represented as vanishing linear combinations of @xmath53-@xmath54-strata . this gives a system of pdes for the formal power series @xmath30 , @xmath39 . for the detailed description of the correspondence between tautological relations and universal pdes for gw potentials see , e. g. , @xcite or @xcite . there are @xmath80 basic tautological relations known at the moment : wdvv , getzler , belorousski - pandharipande , and topological recursion relations in @xmath81 , @xmath82 , @xmath83 , @xmath84 , @xmath85 @xcite . in gromov - witten theory ( and also in topological string theory ) the gromov - witten invariants is usually a structure on the cohomology of a target manifold ( the space @xmath4 ) of on the cohomology of a complex of some other gometric origin . we have introduced the notion of zwiebach invariants in @xcite in order to formalize in a convenient way what physicists mean by topological conformal quantum field theory at the level of a complex rather than at the level of the cohomology . the very general principles of homological algebra imply that algebraic stuctures on the cohomology are often induced by some fundamental structures on a full complex ( the standard example is the induction of the infinity - structures from differential graded algebraic structures ) . such induction usually can be represented as a sum over trees with vertices corresponding to fundamental operations and edges corresponding to the homotopy that contracts the complex to its cohomology . we would like to stress that gromov - witten invariants also can be considered as an induced structure on the cohomology of a complex . in this case , the fundamental structure on the whole complex is determined by zwiebach invariants . we are able to associate some structure on a bicomplex with a special compactification of the moduli space curves ( kimura - stasheff - voronov compactification ) . so , complexes are replaced by bicomplexes , where the second differential reflects the rotation of attached cylinders ( or circles ) . this is an appearance of the string nature of the problem . as an induced structure we indeed obtain a gromov - witten - type theory that , under some additional assumptions , can be presented in terms of a sum over graphs . below we explain the whole construction , following @xcite and with some additional details . we remind the construction of the kimura - stasheff - voronov compactification @xmath86 of the moduli space of curves of genus @xmath0 with @xmath87 marked point . it is a real blow - up of @xmath9 ; we just remember the relative angles at double points . we can also choose an angle of the tangent vector at each marked point ; this way we get the principal @xmath88-bundle over @xmath86 . we denote the total space of this bundle by @xmath89 . there are also the standard mappings between different spaces @xmath89 . first , one can consider the projection @xmath90 forgetting the last marked point . suppose that under the projection we have to contract a sphere that contains the points @xmath91 , @xmath92 , and a node . denote the natural coordinates on the circles corresponding to @xmath91 and a node on a curve in @xmath93 by @xmath94 and @xmath95 . let @xmath96 be a coordinate on the circle corresponding to @xmath91 in @xmath89 . then @xmath97 under the projection @xmath98 . in the same way , if we contract a sphere that contains two nodes and @xmath92 , then @xmath99 , where @xmath100 and @xmath101 are the coordinates on the circles corresponding to the two nodes of a curve in @xmath93 and @xmath102 is a coordinate on the circle at the resulting node in @xmath89 in the same way , when we consider the mappings @xmath103 representing the natural boundary components of @xmath89 , we have @xmath104 , where @xmath105 and @xmath106 are the coordinates on the circles corresponding the points that are glued by @xmath107 into the node and @xmath95 is the coordinate on the circle at the node . for the mapping @xmath108 we also have @xmath109 with the same notations . let us fix a hodge bicomplex @xmath110 with two differentials denoted by @xmath111 and @xmath112 and with an even scalar product @xmath113 invariant under the differentials : @xmath114 the hodge property means that @xmath115 where @xmath116 and @xmath4 is orthogonal to @xmath117 . below we consider the action of @xmath111 and @xmath118 on @xmath119 . we denote by @xmath120 and @xmath121 the action of @xmath111 and @xmath118 respectively on the @xmath122-th component of the tensor product . on each @xmath89 we take a differential form @xmath123 of the mixed degree with values in @xmath11 . the whole system of forms @xmath124 is called _ zwiebach invariants _ , if it satisfies the axioms : 1 . @xmath10 is @xmath13-equivariant . 2 . @xmath125 , @xmath126 . @xmath127 for all @xmath128 ( we denote by @xmath129 the substitution of the vector field generating the action on @xmath89 of the @xmath122-th copy of @xmath130 ) ; @xmath123 is invariant under the action of @xmath88 ; 4 . @xmath131 , where @xmath90 is the mapping forgetting the last marked point . @xmath132 , where @xmath133 represents the boundary component . in the same way , @xmath134 for the mapping @xmath135 @xmath136 , @xmath137 and @xmath138 are the coordinates on the circles at the corresponding points . zwiebach invariants on the bicomplex with zero differentials determine gromov - witten invariants . indeed , in this case the factorization property implies that @xmath124 is lifted from the blowdown of kimura - stasheff - voronov spaces , i.e. it is determined by a set of forms on deligne - mumford spaces . then it is easy to check that this system of forms satisfied all axioms of gromov - witten invariants . induced zwiebach invariants are obtained by the contraction of @xmath117 . we denote by @xmath139 the contraction operator . this means that @xmath140 , @xmath141 is the projection to @xmath117 along @xmath4 , @xmath142 , and @xmath143 . we construct an induced zwiebach form @xmath144 on a homotopy equivalent modification @xmath145 of the space @xmath89 . at each boundary component @xmath146 we glue the cylinder @xmath147 $ ] such that @xmath146 in @xmath89 is identified with @xmath148 in the cylinder . so , we have the mappings @xmath149\to\tilde{\mathcal{s}}_{g , n}$ ] and @xmath150\to\tilde{\mathcal{s}}_{g , n}$ ] representing the boundary components with glued cylinders . we take a form @xmath123 , restrict it to @xmath11 , and extend it to the glued cylinder by the rule that @xmath151 \right)\ ] ] in the first case and @xmath152 \right)\ ] ] in the second case , where @xmath153 $ ] is the bivector obtained from the operator @xmath154 , @xmath155 is the coordinate on @xmath156 $ ] . this determines @xmath144 completely . now it is a straightforward calculation to check that the forms @xmath144 are @xmath157-closed and satisfy the factorization property when restricted to the strata @xmath158 . the induced zwiebach invariants determine gromov - witten invariants . the correlators of the corresponding gromov - witten potential are given by the integrals over the fundamental cycles of @xmath159 ( we just forget the circles at marked points in @xmath145 ) of the forms @xmath160 . in fact , the fundamental class of @xmath159 is represented as a sum over all irreducible boundary strata in @xmath9 . indeed , a boundary stratum @xmath146 in @xmath9 has real codimension equal to the doubled number of the nodes of its generic curve . but then we add in @xmath159 a real two - dimensional cylinder for each node . a simple explicit calculation allows to express the integral over the component of the fundamental cycle of @xmath159 corresponding to @xmath146 . it splits into the integrals of the initial zwiebach invariants ( multiplied by @xmath53-classes ) over the moduli spaces corresponding to the irreducible components of curves in @xmath146 ; they are contracted with the bivectors @xmath161 $ ] ( obtained from the operator @xmath162 via the scalar product ) corresponding to the nodes according to the topology of curves in @xmath146 . so , we represent the correlators of the induced gromov - witten theory as sums over graphs . then one can observe that @xmath163 determines a multiplication on @xmath110 . topology of the spaces @xmath164 and @xmath165 implies that the whole algebraic structure that we obtain on @xmath110 is the structure of cyclic hodge algebra up to @xmath111-homotopy , see @xcite . let us assume that the initial system of zwiebach invariants is simple enough , i. e. , it induces the explicit structure of cyclic hodge algebra on @xmath110 and only the integrals of the zero - degree parts of the initial zwiebach invariants ( multiplied by @xmath53-classes ) are non - vanishing on fundamental cycles . in this case , the induced gromov - witten potential can be described in very simple algebraic terms . it is the motivation of the definition of the hodge field theory construction given in the next section . in this section , we describe in a very formal algebraic way the sum over graphs obtained as an expression for the gromov - witten potential induced from zwiebach invariants in the previous section . in this section , we recall the definition of cyclic hodge dgbv - algebras @xcite ( cyclic hodge algebras , for short ) . a supercommutative associative @xmath5-algebra @xmath110 with unit is called cyclic hodge algebra , if there are two odd linear operators @xmath166 and an even linear function @xmath167 called integral . they must satisfy the following axioms : 1 . @xmath168 is a bicomplex : @xmath169 2 . @xmath170 , where @xmath116 and @xmath117 is represented as a direct sum of subspaces of dimension @xmath171 generated by @xmath172 for some vectors @xmath173 , i. e. @xmath174 ( hodge decomposition ) ; 3 . @xmath111 is an operator of the first order , it satisfies the leibniz rule : @xmath175 ( here and below we denote by @xmath176 the parity of @xmath177 ) ; 4 . @xmath118 is an operator of the second order , it satisfies the @xmath178-term relation : @xmath179 5 . @xmath118 satisfies the property called @xmath3-axiom : @xmath180 ( here @xmath181 and @xmath182 are the operators of multiplication by @xmath183 and @xmath184 respectively , @xmath185 means supertrace ) . define an operator @xmath186 related to the particular choice of hodge decomposition . we put @xmath140 , and on each subspace @xmath187 we define @xmath139 as @xmath188 we see that @xmath189=0 $ ] ; @xmath190 $ ] is the projection to @xmath117 along @xmath4 ; @xmath191 is the projection to @xmath4 along @xmath117 . consider the integral @xmath167 . we require that @xmath192 these properties imply that @xmath193 , @xmath194 , and @xmath195 . we can define a scalar product on @xmath110 as @xmath196 we suppose that this scalar product is non - degenerate . using the scalar product we may turn any operator @xmath197 into the bivector that we denote by @xmath198 $ ] . here we explain a way to encode some tensor expressions over an arbitrary vector space in terms of graphs . consider an arbitrary graph ( we allow graphs to have leaves and we require vertices to be at least of degree @xmath199 , the definition of graph that we use can be found in @xcite ) . we associate a symmetric @xmath87-form to each internal vertex of degree @xmath87 , a symmetric bivector to each egde , and a vector to each leaf . then we can substitute the tensor product of all vectors in leaves and bivectors in edges into the product of @xmath87-forms in vertices , distributing the components of tensors in the same way as the corresponding edges and leaves are attached to vertices in the graph . this way we get a number . let us study an example : @xmath200 we assign a @xmath201-form @xmath202 to the left vertex of this graph and a @xmath199-form @xmath203 to the right vertex . then the number that we get from this graph is @xmath204 . note that vectors , bivectors and @xmath87-forms used in this construction can depend on some variables . then what we get is not a number , but a function . consider a cyclic hodge algebra @xmath110 . there are some standard tensors over @xmath110 , which we associate to elements of graphs below . here we introduce the notations for these tensors . we always assign the form @xmath205 to a vertex of degree @xmath87 . there is a collection of bivectors that will be assigned below to edges : @xmath161 $ ] , @xmath206 $ ] , @xmath207 $ ] , @xmath208 $ ] , @xmath209 $ ] , @xmath210 $ ] , and @xmath211 $ ] . in pictures , edges with these bivectors will be denoted by @xmath212 respectively . note that an empty edge corresponding to the bivector @xmath207 $ ] can usually be contracted ( if it is not a loop ) . the vectors that we will put at leaves depend on some variables . let @xmath213 be a homogeneous basis of @xmath4 . in particular , we assume that @xmath8 is the unit of @xmath110 . to each vector @xmath27 we associate formal variables @xmath28 , @xmath36 , of the same parity as @xmath27 . then we will put at a leaf one of the vectors @xmath214 , @xmath36 , and we will mark such leaf by the number @xmath87 . in our picture , an empty leaf is the same as the leaf marked by @xmath47 . there is a subtlety related to the fact that @xmath110 is a @xmath215-graded space . in order to give an honest definition we must do the following . suppose we consider a graph of genus @xmath0 . we can choose @xmath0 edges in such a way that the graph being cut at these edge turns into a tree . to each of these edges we have already assigned a bivector @xmath198 $ ] for some operator @xmath216 . now we have to put the bivector @xmath217 $ ] instead of the bivector @xmath198 $ ] , where @xmath218 is an operator defined by the formula @xmath219 . in particular , consider the following graph ( this is also an example to the notations given above ) : @xmath220 an empty loop corresponds to the bivector @xmath207 $ ] . an empty leaf corresponds to the vector @xmath221 . a trivalent vertex corresponds to the @xmath199-form given by the formula @xmath222 . if we ignore this remark , then what we get is just the trace of the operator @xmath223 . but using this remark we get the supertrace of this operator . in fact , this subtlety will play no role in this paper . it affects only some signs in calculations and all these signs will be hidden in lemmas shared from @xcite . so , one can just ignore this remark . we are going to define the potential using correlators . let @xmath224 be the sum over graphs of genus @xmath0 with @xmath87 leaves marked by @xmath225 , @xmath226 , where @xmath227 are vectors in @xmath110 , and @xmath228 are just formal symbols . the index of each internal vertex of these graphs is @xmath229 ; we associate to it the symmetric form . there are two possible types of edges : edges marked by @xmath161 $ ] ( thick black dots in pictures , `` heavy edges '' in the text ) and edges marked by @xmath207 $ ] ( empty edges ) . since an empty edge connecting two different vertices can be contracted , we assume that all empty edges are loops . consider a vertex of such graph . let us describe all possible half - edges adjusted to this vertex . there are @xmath230 , @xmath39 , half - edges coming from @xmath0 empty loops ; @xmath231 half - edges coming from heavy edges of graph , and @xmath57 leaves marked @xmath232 . then we say that the type of this vertex is @xmath233 . we denote the type of a vertex @xmath234 by @xmath235 . consider a graph @xmath236 in the sum determining the correlator @xmath224 we associate to @xmath236 a number : we contract according to the graph structure all tensors corresponding to its vertices , edges , and leaves ( for leaves , we take vectors @xmath227 ) . let us denote this number by @xmath237 . also we weight each graph by a coefficient which is the product of two combinatorial constants . the first factor is equal to @xmath238 here @xmath239 is the order of the automorphism group of the labeled graph @xmath236 , @xmath240 is the set of internal vertices of @xmath236 . in other words , we can label each vertex @xmath234 by @xmath241 , delete all empty loops , and then we get a graph with the order of the automorphism group equal to @xmath242 . the second factor is equal to @xmath243 the integrals used in this formula can be calculated with the help of the witten - kontsevich theorem @xcite . so , the whole contribution of the graph @xmath236 to the correlator is equal to @xmath244 . one can check that the non - trivial contribution to the correlator @xmath245 is given only by graphs that have exactly @xmath246 heavy edges . the geometric meaning here is very clear . the number @xmath237 comes from the integral of the induced gromov - witten invariants of degree zero , while the coefficient @xmath247 is exactly the combinatorial interpretation of the intersection number of @xmath248 with the stratum whose dual graph is obtained from @xmath236 by the procedure described after the definition of @xmath249 . we fix a cyclic hodge algebra and consider the formal power series @xmath250 defined as @xmath251 abusing notations , we allow to mark the leaves by @xmath252 , @xmath253 , or @xmath183 ; all this variants are possible and denote the same . for example , consider the trivial cyclic hodge algebra : @xmath254 , @xmath255 , @xmath256 . then @xmath257 , and the correlator @xmath258 consists just of one graph with one vertex , @xmath0 empty loops , and @xmath87 leaves marked by @xmath259 . the explicit value of the coefficient of this graph is , by definition , @xmath260 so , in the case of trivial cyclic hodge algebra we obtain exactly the gromov - witten potential of the point ( i. e. , @xmath261 ) that we denote below by @xmath262 . abusing notation , we use the same symbol @xmath263 for the correlators in gw theory and in hodge field theory . we hope that it does not lead to a confusion . for instance , @xmath258 in the trivial example above is the correlator of the trivial hodge field theory , while @xmath264 is the correlator of the trivial gw theory . in this section , we prove that the potential satisfies the same string and dilaton equations as gw potentials . if @xmath265 , we have : @xmath266 consider a graph @xmath236 contributing to the correlator on the left hand side of the string equation . the special leaf that we are going to remove is marked by @xmath267 and is attached to a vertex @xmath234 of genus @xmath268 ( i. e. , with @xmath268 attached light loops ) with @xmath269 more attached leaves labeled by indices in @xmath270 , @xmath271 , and @xmath272 attached half - edges coming from heavy edges and loops . let us remove the leaf @xmath267 and change the label of one of the leaves attached to the same vertex from @xmath273 to @xmath274 . this way we obtain a graph @xmath275 contributing to the @xmath276-th summand of the right hand side of . we take the sum of these graphs over @xmath277 . of course , we skip the summands where @xmath278 . note that this sum is not empty ( if @xmath236 gives a non - zero contribution to the left hand side of ) . indeed , if it is empty , this means that @xmath278 for all @xmath277 . therefore , since we expect that the contribution to @xmath279 of the vertex @xmath234 on the left hand side is nonzero , it follows that @xmath280 and @xmath281 . so , there are three possible local pictures : @xmath282 the first picture can be replaced with the bivector @xmath283 $ ] , which is equal to zero . therefore , @xmath237 is also equal to zero . in the second case , we also get @xmath47 since @xmath284 . the third picture is possible only when it is the whole graph , and this is in contradiction with the assumption that @xmath265 . note also that @xmath285 and @xmath286 for all @xmath276 . indeed , we have just removed the leaf with the unit of the algebra , so this ca nt change anything in the contraction of tensors . therefore , @xmath287 . also both the leaf @xmath267 and the vertex @xmath234 are the fixed points of any automorphism of @xmath236 . the same is for the vertex corresponding to @xmath234 in @xmath275 . therefore , the automorphism groups are isomorphic for both graphs . since we make no changes for empty loops , it follows that @xmath286 . let us prove that @xmath288 . indeed , the vertices of @xmath236 and @xmath275 are in a natural one - to - one correspondence . moreover , the local pictures for all of them except for @xmath234 and its image in @xmath275 are the same . therefore , the corresponding intersection numbers contributing to @xmath279 and @xmath289 are the same . the unique difference appeares when we take the intersection numbers corresponding to @xmath234 and its images in @xmath275 , @xmath277 . but then we can apply the string equation of the gw theory of the point , and we see that @xmath290 ( here @xmath291 is an arbitrary on - to - one mapping ) . this implies that @xmath288 . so , we have @xmath292 . in order to complete the proof of , we should just notice that when we write down this expression for all graphs contributing to the left hand side of , we use each graph contributing to the right hand side of exactly once . if @xmath293 , we have : @xmath294 consider a graph @xmath236 contributing to the correlator on the left hand side of . the special leaf that we are going to remove is marked by @xmath295 and is attached to a vertex @xmath234 of genus @xmath268 ( i. e. , with @xmath268 attached light loops ) with @xmath269 more attached leaves labeled by indices in @xmath270 , @xmath271 , and @xmath272 attached half - edges coming from heavy edges and loops . let us remove the leaf @xmath295 . we obtain a graph @xmath296 contributing to the right hand side of . let us prove this . indeed , if we remove a leaf and do nt get a proper graph , it follows that we have a trivalent vertex . since the contribution of this vertex to @xmath279 should be non - zero , it follows that the unique possible local picture is @xmath297 but this picture is the whole graph , and it is in contradiction with the condition @xmath293 . the same argument as in the proof of the string equation shows that @xmath298 and @xmath299 . also , the contribution to @xmath279 and @xmath300 of all vertices except for the changed one is the same . the change of the intersection number corresponding to the vertex @xmath234 is captured by the dilaton equation of the trivial gw theory : @xmath301 ( again , @xmath291 is an arbitrary on - to - one mapping ) . this implies that @xmath302 , and , therefore , @xmath303 let us write down the last equation for all graphs @xmath236 contributing to the left hand side . observe that any graph @xmath296 contributing to the right hand side occurs @xmath304 times , since the leaf @xmath295 could be attached to any its vertex . therefore , any graph @xmath296 contributing to the right hand side of appears in these equations with the coefficient @xmath305 this completes the proof . as we have explained in section [ rel - for - corr ] , any linear relation @xmath76 among @xmath53-@xmath54-strata in the cohomology of the moduli space of curves gives rise to a family of universal relations for the correlators of a gromov - witten theory . [ thm - tautolog ] the system of universal relations coming from a tautological relation in the cohomology of the moduli space of curves holds for the correlators @xmath306 of cyclic hodge algebra . note that some special cases of this theorem were proved in @xcite . our argument below is a natural generalization of the technique introduced in these papers . also we are able now to give an explanation why we have managed to perform all our calculations there , see remark [ last - remark ] . let us give here a brief account of the proof of this theorem . first , the definition of correlators of the hodge field theory can be extended to the intersection with an arbitrary tautological class @xmath307 of degree @xmath308 in the space @xmath9 , not only the a monomial in @xmath53-classes . in that case , we do the following . again , we consider the sum over all graphs @xmath236 with @xmath309 heavy edges , and the number @xmath237 is defined as above . instead of the coefficient @xmath247 we use the intersection number of @xmath307 with the stratum whose dual graph is obtained from @xmath236 by the procedure described right after the definition of @xmath249 . namely , a vertex with @xmath0 loops is replaced by a vertex marked by @xmath0 . this definition is very natural from the point of view of zwiebach invariants . however , we know from gromov - witten theory that this extension of the notion of correlator is unnecessary . indeed , all integrals with arbitrary tautological classes can be expressed in terms of the integrals with only @xmath53-classes via some universal formulas . the main question is whether these universal formulas also work in hodge field theory . actually , the main result that more or less immediately proves the theorem is the positive answer to this question . the rest of the paper is devoted to the proof of main theorem , and here we would like to overview it here . in section 6 , we study the structure of graphs that can appear in formulas for the correlators of hodge field theory . we prove that if @xmath310 and there is at least one heavy edge in @xmath236 , then all vertices have genus @xmath311 , i. e. , there is at most one empty loop at any vertex . this basically means that in calculations we ll have to deal only with genera @xmath47 and @xmath312 . also this allows us to write down the action of a hodge field theory . in section 7 , we prove the main technical result ( main lemma ) . informally , it states that @xmath313 when we apply these two operators to the correlators of a hodge field theory . in order to prove it , we look at a small piece ( consisting just of one heavy edge and one or two vertices that are attached to it ) in one of the graphs of a correlator . of course , in the correlator we can vary this small piece in an arbitrary way , such that the rest of the graph remains the same . so , when we consider the sum of all these small pieces , it is also a correlator of the hodge field theory . thus we reduce the proof to a special case of the whole statement . but since the genus of a vertex is @xmath311 , it appear now to be a low - genera statement that can be done by a straightforward calculation . in section 8 , we present the proof of the main theorem . consider a @xmath53-@xmath54-stratum @xmath307 whose stable dual graph has @xmath59 edges . there is a universal expression of the integral over @xmath307 coming from gromov - witten theory . it includes @xmath122 entries of the scalar product restricted to @xmath4 . in terms of graphs , it means that we are to introduce new edges with the bivector @xmath206 $ ] on them , and there are @xmath122 such edges in our expression . a direct corollary of the main lemma is that we can always replace @xmath206 $ ] by @xmath207-\psi [ g_-g_+]-[g_-g_+]\psi$ ] . in sections 8.2 , 8.3 , and 8.4 , we show that when we replace @xmath206 $ ] by @xmath207-\psi [ g_-g_+]-[g_-g_+]\psi$ ] at all edges corresponding to the scalar product restricted to @xmath4 , we obtain a new expression for the integral over @xmath307 that again contains only heavy edges and empty loops , as any ordinary correlator . the main problem now is to understand the combinatorial coefficient of a graph @xmath236 obtained this way . since we have a sum over graphs with heavy edges and empty loops , it is natural to identify again these graphs with the corresponding strata in the moduli space of curves . then we can calculate the intersection index of the stratum corresponding to a graph @xmath236 and the initial class @xmath307 . roughly speaking , the main thing that we have to do is to decide about each node in @xmath307 ( represented initially by @xmath206 $ ] ) , whether we have this node in stratum corresponding to @xmath236 . if yes , then we have an excessive intersection ( so , we must put @xmath314 on one of the half - edges of the corresponding edge ) , and we keep this edge in @xmath236 ( so , we replace @xmath206 $ ] with @xmath315 $ ] or @xmath316\psi$ ] ) . if no , then we do nt have this edge in @xmath236 , so we contract @xmath206 $ ] , i. e. , replace it with @xmath207 $ ] . so , the procedure that we used to get rid of the scalar product is the same as the procedure of the intersection of @xmath307 with strata of the complementary dimension . this means ( section 8.5 ) that the universal formula coming from gromov - witten theory is equivalent to the natural formula for the `` correlator with @xmath307 '' coming from zwiebach theory . the tautological relation is a sum of classes equal to zero . so , while the universal formula coming from gromov - witten theory gives ( in the case of a vanishing class ) a non - trivial expression in correlators , the natural formula coming from zwiebach theory gives identically zero . this proves our theorem , see section 8.6 . in this section , we recall several useful lemmas shared in @xcite . in particular , these lemmas give some strong restrictions on graphs that can give a non - zero contirbution to the correlators defined above . [ tillmann ] @xcite the following vectors and bivectors are equal to zero : @xmath317 also let us remind another lemma in @xcite that is very useful in calculations . [ g - jump ] @xcite for any vectors @xmath318 , @xmath319 , @xmath320 both lemmas are just simple corollaries of the axioms of cyclic hodge algebra . consider a graph studied in section [ subsec - correlators ] . it can have leaves , empty and heavy loops , and heavy edges . consider a vertex of such graph . let us assume that there are @xmath321 empty loops , @xmath322 heavy loops , @xmath323 heavy edges going to the other vertices of the graph , and @xmath324 leaves attached to this vertex : @xmath325 this picture can be considered as an @xmath326 form . let us denote it by @xmath327 . [ lemma - emptyedges ] if @xmath328 and @xmath329 , then @xmath330 . in other words , if there are at least two empty loops at a vertex , then there should not be any heavy loops or edges attached to this vertex . otherwise the contribution of the whole graph vanishes . this implies in the definition of correlators one should consider only graphs of one of the following two types : 1 . one - vertex graphs with no heavy edges ( loops ) . 2 . arbitrary graphs with at most one empty loop at each vertex . the contribution of all other graphs vanishes . this corollary dramatically simplifies all our calculations with graphs given below . also we can write down now the action of the hodge field theory . let @xmath331 , @xmath332 $ ] be the `` dimension zero '' part of the potential of the hodge field theory , namely , @xmath333 the first sum is taken over @xmath36 such that @xmath293 . so , it is exactly the generating function for the vertices of our graph expressions . then the action of the hodge field theory is equal to @xmath334 if we put @xmath335 for @xmath34 , then we immediately obtain the bcov - type action discussed in ( * ? ? ? * appendix ) and ( * ? ? ? * appendix ) . the similar actions were also studied in @xcite and @xcite . we consider the form @xmath327 and we assume that @xmath328 . first , let us study the case when @xmath336 . in this case , our @xmath326-form can be represented as a contraction via the bivector @xmath207 $ ] of two forms , @xmath337 and @xmath338 . let us prove that the last one is equal to zero . indeed , this two - form can be represented as @xmath339 , where the two - form @xmath340 is represented by the picture @xmath341 according to lemma [ tillmann ] , @xmath342 . therefore , @xmath343 and the whole form @xmath327 is also equal to zero . now consider the case when @xmath344 . in this case , our @xmath326-form can be represented as a contraction via the bivector @xmath207 $ ] of two forms , @xmath345 and @xmath346 . let us prove that the last one is equal to zero . indeed , @xmath347 here the first equality is definition of @xmath346 , the second one is just an equivalent redrawing , the third equality is application of lemma [ g - jump ] , the fourth one is again an equivalent redrawing . the last picture contains the bivector which is equal to zero according to lemma [ tillmann ] . therefore , the whole picture is equal to zero , and @xmath348 . so , the whole form @xmath327 is equal to zero also in this case . this proves the lemma . the main technical tool that we use in the proof of theorem [ thm - tautolog ] is the lemma that we prove in this section . [ main - lemma ] for any @xmath349 , @xmath350 , @xmath351 a simple corollary of this lemma is the following : [ cor - main - l ] for any @xmath352 , @xmath353 , @xmath354 in other words , we can state informally that @xmath355 . the proof of the lemma can be reduced to a small number of special cases . we consider correlators whose graphs have only one heavy edge . [ [ section ] ] the first case is the following : let @xmath356 . we prove that for any @xmath349 , @xmath357 first , we see that according to the definition of the correlator , the left hand side of equation is the sum over graphs with two vertices and with @xmath161 $ ] on the unique edge that connects the vertices . for each @xmath358 we can consider the corresponding distribution of leaves between the vertices ( to be precise , let us assume that @xmath359 ) . then the coefficient of such graph is @xmath360 , and we take the sum over all possible positions of @xmath111 at the leaves . using the leibniz rule for @xmath111 and the property that @xmath361=-g_-$ ] , we see that this sum is equal to the sum over graphs with two vertices and with @xmath362 $ ] on the unique edge that connects the vertices . for each @xmath358 , @xmath363 , we consider the corresponding distribution of leaves between the vertices . then the coefficient of such graph is still @xmath360 , and the underlying tensor expression can be written ( after we multiply the whole sum by @xmath364 ) as @xmath365 let us recall that the @xmath178-term relation for @xmath118 implies that @xmath366 using this , we can rewrite the whole sum over graphs as @xmath367\\ -\sum_{i\not=1}\left[\left(v_1,\prod_{j\not=1,i}v_j\cdot g_-(v_i)\right)\cdot\right . \\ \left.\sum_{i'\sqcup j ' \sqcup\{i\}=\{2,\dots , n\ } } \left(|j'|-1\right)\langle \tau_{a_1 } \tau_0 \prod_{j\in i ' } \tau_{a_j } \rangle_0 \langle \tau_{a_i } \tau_0 \prod_{j\in j ' } \tau_{a_j } \rangle_0\right].\end{gathered}\ ] ] using that @xmath368 equation , and the fact that @xmath369 we can rewrite expression as @xmath370 the last formula coincides by definition with the right hand side of equation multiplied by @xmath364 . this proves the first special case . [ [ section-1 ] ] the second case is in genus @xmath312 . let @xmath371 . we prove that for any @xmath349 , @xmath372 according to the definition of the correlator , the left hand side of equation is the sum over graphs of two possible types . the first type include graphs with two vertices and two edges . the first edge is heavy and connects the vertices ; the second edge is an empty loop attached to the first vertex . for each @xmath358 , @xmath373 , we can consider the corresponding distribution of leaves between the vertices ( we assume that leaves with indices in @xmath374 are at the first edge ) . then the coefficient of such graph is @xmath375 . the second type include graphs with one vertex and one heavy loop . all leaves are attached to this vertex , and the coefficient of such graph is @xmath376 . for both types of graphs , we take the sum over all possible positions of @xmath111 at the leaves . using the leibniz rule for @xmath111 and the property that @xmath361=-g_-$ ] , we get the same graphs as before , but there is no @xmath111 , and instead of @xmath161 $ ] we have @xmath377 $ ] on the corresponding edge . using lemma [ g - jump ] , we move @xmath378 in graphs of the first type to the leaves marked by indices in @xmath218 . using the @xmath3-axiom and lemma [ g - jump ] , we move @xmath378 in graphs of the second type to all leaves . this way we get graphs of the same type in both cases . we get graphs with one vertex , one empty loop attached to it , all leaves are also attached to this vertex , and there is @xmath378 on one of the leaves . one can easily check that the coefficient of the graphs with @xmath378 at the @xmath48-th leaf is equal to @xmath379 it is exactly the unique graph contributing to the @xmath48-th summand of the right hand side of equation , and the coefficient is right . this proves that special case . [ [ section-2 ] ] consider @xmath37 . let @xmath380 . in this case , the statement that for any @xmath349 , @xmath381 is immediately reduced to @xmath382 ; it is a simple corollary of lemma [ tillmann ] . consider the left hand side of equation . as usual , using the leibniz rule for @xmath111 and the property that @xmath361=-g_-$ ] , we can remove all @xmath111 , but then we must change one of @xmath161 $ ] on edges to @xmath377 $ ] . let us cut out the peaces of graphs that includes this edges with @xmath377 $ ] , all empty loops , leaves and halves of heavy edges attached to the ends of this special edge . since we consider the sum over all possible graphs contributing to correlators , these small pieces can be gathered into groups according to the type of the rest of the initial graph . each group forms exactly one of the special cases studied above . so , we know that @xmath378 should jump either to one of the leaves or to one of the heavy edges attached to the ends of its edge . in the first case , we get exactly the graphs in the right hand side of equation ; in the second case , we get zero . one can easily check that we get the right coefficients for the graphs in the right hand side of equation . this proves the lemma . consider the expression in correlators corresponding to a @xmath53-@xmath54-stratum as it is described in section [ integrals - strata ] . to each vertex of the corresponding stable dual graph we assign the sum of graphs that forms correlator in the sense of section [ subsec - correlators ] . the leaves of these graphs corresponding to the edges of the stable dual graph ( nodes ) are connected in these pictures by edges with @xmath206 $ ] ( the restriction of the scalar product to @xmath4 ) . we call the edges with @xmath206 $ ] `` white edges '' and mark them in pictures by thick white points , see . the axioms of cyclic hodge algebra imply a system of linear equations for the graphs of this type . in particular , it has appeared that playing with this linear equations we can always get rid of white edges in the sum of pictures corresponding to a stable dual graph , see @xcite . however , previously it was just an experimental fact . now we can show how it works in general . the numerous examples of the correspondence between stable dual graphs and graphs expressions in cyclic hodge algebras and also of the linear relations implied by the axioms of cyclic hodge algebra are given in @xcite . below , we explain how one can represent the expression in correlators corresponding to a @xmath53-@xmath54-stratum in terms of graphs with only empty and heavy edges and with no white edges . the unique tool that we need is lemmas [ main - lemma ] and [ cor - main - l ] proved above . consider a stable dual graph with two vertices and one edge connecting them : @xmath383 the corresponding expression in correlators is @xmath384 ( here we denote by @xmath385 an arbitrary choice of @xmath386 ) . it is convenient for us to rewrite this expression as @xmath387^{\alpha_1\alpha_2}\cdot \langle\tau_{b_0}(x_{\alpha_2})\prod_{i=1}^{n_2}\tau_{b_i}(e_\bullet ) \prod_{i=1}^{l_2}\tau_{v_i}(e_1)\rangle_{g_1},\end{gathered}\ ] ] where @xmath388 is the basis of the whole @xmath110 . using the fact that @xmath389 and applying lemma [ cor - main - l ] , we obtain @xmath390^{\alpha_1\alpha_2}\cdot \langle\tau_{b_0}(x_{\alpha_2})\prod_{i=1}^{n_2}\tau_{b_i}(e_\bullet ) \prod_{i=1}^{l_2}\tau_{v_i}(e_1)\rangle_{g_1 } \\ = \langle\tau_{a_0}(x_{\alpha_1})\prod_{i=1}^{n_1}\tau_{a_i}(e_\bullet ) \prod_{i=1}^{l_1}\tau_{u_i}(e_1)\rangle_{g_1}\cdot \\ [ id]^{\alpha_1\alpha_2}\cdot \langle\tau_{b_0}(x_{\alpha_2})\prod_{i=1}^{n_2}\tau_{b_i}(e_\bullet ) \prod_{i=1}^{l_2}\tau_{v_i}(e_1)\rangle_{g_1 } \\ - \langle\tau_{a_0 + 1}(x_{\alpha_1})\prod_{i=1}^{n_1}\tau_{a_i}(e_\bullet ) \prod_{i=1}^{l_1}\tau_{u_i}(e_1)\rangle_{g_1}\cdot \\ [ g_-g_+]^{\alpha_1\alpha_2}\cdot \langle\tau_{b_0}(x_{\alpha_2})\prod_{i=1}^{n_2}\tau_{b_i}(e_\bullet ) \prod_{i=1}^{l_2}\tau_{v_i}(e_1)\rangle_{g_1 } \\ - \langle\tau_{a_0}(x_{\alpha_1})\prod_{i=1}^{n_1}\tau_{a_i}(e_\bullet ) \prod_{i=1}^{l_1}\tau_{u_i}(e_1)\rangle_{g_1}\cdot \\ [ g_-g_+]^{\alpha_1\alpha_2}\cdot \langle\tau_{b_0 + 1}(x_{\alpha_2})\prod_{i=1}^{n_2}\tau_{b_i}(e_\bullet ) \prod_{i=1}^{l_2}\tau_{v_i}(e_1)\rangle_{g_1}\end{gathered}\ ] ] in all three summands of the right hand side we still have two correlators , whose leaves corresponding to the nodes are connected by some special edges . but now the connecting edge is either marked by @xmath207 $ ] ( an empty edge ) or by @xmath161 $ ] ( an ordinary heavy edge ) . so , this way we get rid of the white edge in this case . informally , in terms of pictures , we can describe equation as @xmath391 when we put @xmath53 , we mean that we add one more @xmath53-class at the node at the corresponding branch of the curve . dashed circles denote correlators . we perform the same calculation as above , but now we explain it in terms of informal pictures from the very beginning . so , the first step is the same as above : @xmath392 then we apply lemma [ main - lemma ] to each of the summands in the right hand side : @xmath393 @xmath394 and @xmath395 we take the sum of these three expressions , and we see that all pictures where we have edges with @xmath211 $ ] and @xmath210 $ ] are cancelled . so , we get an expression for the sum of graphs representing the initial stratum in terms of graphs with only empty and heavy edges . the general argument is exactly the same as in the second example . in fact , this gives a procedure how to write an expression in graphs with only empty and heavy edges ( and no white edges ) starting from a stable dual graph . let us describe this procedure . take a stable dual graph corresponding to a @xmath53-@xmath54-stratum of dimension @xmath122 in @xmath9 . first , we are to decorate it a little bit . for each edge , we either leave it untouched , or substitute it with an arrow ( in two possible ways ) . at the pointing end of the arrow , we increase the number of @xmath53-classes by @xmath312 . each of these graphs we weight with the inversed order of its automorphism group ( automorphisms must preserve all decorations ) multiplied by @xmath396 , where @xmath397 is the number of arrows . consider a decorated dual graph . to each its vertex we associate the corresponding correlator of cyclic hodge algebra ( we add new leaves in order to represent @xmath54-classes ) . then we connect the leaves corresponding to the nodes either by empty edges ( if the corresponding edge of the decorated graph is untouched ) or by heavy edges ( if the corresponding edge of the dual graph is decorated by an arrow ) . we can simplify the resulting graphs obtained in the previous subsection . first , we can contract empty edges ( as much as it is possible ; it is forbidden to contract loops ) . second , we can remove leaves added for the needs of @xmath54-classes . indeed , each such leaf is equipped with a unit of @xmath110 , so it does nt affect the contraction of tensors corresponding to a graph . moreover , when we remove all leaves corresponding to @xmath54-classes , we still have graph with at least trivalent vertices . otherwise , this graph is equal to zero , c. f. arguments in the proofs of string and dilaton equations . so , we obtain final graphs that have the same number of heavy edges as the dimension of the initial @xmath53-@xmath54-stratum , the same number of leaves as the initial dual graph , and some number of empty loops , at most one at each vertex . the exceptional case is when @xmath398 ; in this case we obtain only one graph , with one vertex , @xmath87 leaves , and @xmath0 empty loops . in the first case , let us turn a graph like this into a stable dual graph . just replace its vertices with no empty loops by vertices of genus zero , vertices with empty loops by vertices of genus one , heavy edges are edges , and leaves are leaves . there are no @xmath53- or @xmath54- classes . it is obvious that the codimension of the stratum corresponding to this dual graph is @xmath122 . indeed , in this case it is just the number of nodes . so , to each @xmath53-@xmath54-stratum @xmath399 of dimension @xmath400 we associate a linear combination @xmath401 of strata of codimension @xmath122 with no @xmath53- or @xmath54-classes , whose curves have irreducible components of genus @xmath47 and @xmath312 only . we prove it two steps . first , consider a one - vertex stable dual graph with no edges ( just a correlator ) . in this case , the intersection number @xmath403 is just by definition @xmath404 , where @xmath405 is the cyclic hodge algebra graph that turns into @xmath406 via the procedure described above . then , consider a stable dual graph with one edge . it is the intersection of the one - vertex stable dual graph with an irreducible component of the boundary . for a given @xmath406 , this component of the boundary either intersects it transversaly , or we have an excessive intersection . in the first case , the corresponding node is not represented in @xmath406 . this means that in @xmath405 it should be an empty edge . in the second case , this node is one of the nodes of @xmath406 , so it should be a heavy edge of @xmath405 . also , it is an excessive intersection , so we are to add the sum of @xmath53-classes with the negative sign at the marked points ( half - edges ) corresponding to the node , see ( * ? ? ? * appendix ) . if @xmath398 , this means that each of the vertices of the initial stable dual graph also has dimension @xmath47 , and the corresponding correlator of cyclic hodge algebra is represented by one one - vertex graph with no heavy edges . also this means that each edge of the initial stable dual graph is replaced in the algorithm above by an empty edge . so , we can think that we just work with the correlators of the gromov - witten theory of the point . in this case proposition becomes obvious . consider the system of subalgebras @xmath408 of the cohomological tautological algebras of @xmath9 generated by strata with no @xmath53- or @xmath54-classes and with irreducible curves of genus @xmath47 and @xmath312 only . let @xmath76 be a linear combination of @xmath53-@xmath54-strata of dimension @xmath122 in @xmath9 . then the expression in correlators of cyclic hodge algebras corresponding to @xmath76 is equaivalent to a sum of some graphs with coefficients equal to the intersection of @xmath76 with classes in @xmath409 . so , if the class of @xmath76 is equal to zero , then the corresponding equation ( and also the whole system of equations that we described in section [ rel - for - corr ] ) for correlators of cyclic hodge algebra is valid . theorem is proved . evidently , @xmath410 is a module over @xmath411 . also it is obvious that @xmath410 is closed under pull - backs and push - forwards via the forgetful morphisms . this explains why it was enough to make only one check in the simplest case in order to get the system of equations in @xcite ( cf . an argument in the last section in @xcite ) . from the point of view of the theory of zwiebach invariants , both propositions look very natural . indeed , we try to give a graph expression for the integral of an induced gromov - witten form multiplied by a tautological class @xmath399 . since we know that we are able to integrate only degree zero parts of induced gromov - witten invariants , we should just take the sum over all graphs that correspond to the strata of complimentary dimension in @xmath410 . the coefficients are to be the intersection numbers of these strata with @xmath399 . on the other hand , we know that in any gromov - witten theory it is enough to fix the integrals of gromov - witten invariants multiplied by @xmath53-classes . then the integrals of gromov - witten invariants multiplied by arbitrary tautological classes are expressed by universal formulas . we can try to use these universal formulas also in hodge field theory . they are exactly our expressions with white edges . so , we have two different natural ways to express in terms of graphs the integrals of induced gromov - witten invariants multiplied by tautological classes . propositions [ prop1 ] and [ prop2 ] state that these two different expressions coinside . a. losev , hodge strings and elements of k. saito s theory of primitive form , topological field theory , primitive forms and related topics ( kyoto , 1996 ) , 305335 , progr . , 160 , birkhaeuser boston , boston , ma , 1998 . Abstract:
[ "we propose a hodge field theory construction that captures algebraic properties of the reduction of zwiebach invariants to gromov - witten invariants . it generalizes the barannikov - kontsevich construction to the case of higher genera correlators with gravitational descendants . we prove the main theorem stating that algebraically defined hodge field theory correlators satisfy all tautological relations . from this perspective the statement that barannikov - kontsevich construction provides a solution of the wdvv equation looks as the simplest particular case of our theorem . also it generalizes the particular cases of other low - genera tautological relations proven in our earlier works ; we replace the old technical proofs by a novel conceptual proof ." ]
12,226
12,226
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in adiabatic quantum computation ( aqc ) @xcite quantum algorithms are implemented by initializing a system in an easily prepared ground state , followed by adiabatic evolution subject to a hamiltonian whose final ground state represents the solution to a computational problem . it is known that this model is computationally equivalent to the standard circuit model of quantum computation , in the sense that each model can simulate the other with polynomial resource overhead @xcite . while error correction methods have been proposed for aqc @xcite , and arguments have been put forth that aqc is inherently insensitive to certain types of errors @xcite , unlike the circuit model it is still an open question whether aqc can be made fault tolerant subject to realistic noise models pertaining to aqc in an open system setting . indeed , even what constitutes a consistent picture of adiabatic evolution in open systems is still the subject of some debate @xcite . nevertheless , experiments in aqc using superconducting qubits have made great strides recently @xcite . the performance of adiabatic quantum algorithms is characterized by the adiabatic error , i.e. , the fidelity loss between the actual time - evolved state ( the solution of the schrdinger equation ) and the instantaneous ground state , calculated at the final time @xmath0 . since the adiabatic theorem fock , kato , messiah : book , teufel : book guarantees that in the limit of arbitrarily slow evolution the error approaches zero , one expects that a more slowly varying hamiltonian and/or a longer evolution time should result in higher fidelity or accuracy . this is the _ accuracy - time tradeoff _ in quantum adiabatic algorithms . this tradeoff is often formalized by the adiabatic condition , which states ( roughly ) that the variation rate of the hamiltonian should be @xmath1 the adiabatic error times the gap squared . a clear disadvantage of this condition is the inherent vagueness of @xmath1 , which makes it difficult to reliably quantify the evolution time _ vs _ the desired accuracy . moreover , violations of the traditional adiabatic condition have been reported @xcite , in the sense that the condition is neither necessary nor sufficient for adiabatic evolution . while these violations have been explained as being either due to inconsistent manipulations @xcite or due to resonant transitions amin , it appears that there is no single adiabatic theorem . rather , a number of different rigorous conditions have been derived , which apply under various mathematical assumptions @xcite . a rigorous condition which holds for analytic hamiltonians and exibits the explicit scaling with system size , needed for aqc resource quantification , was derived in ref . @xcite . in this work we perform a comprehensive analysis of the adiabatic error for the case of an adiabatic quantum search algorithm , in a closed system setting . we focus on quantum search not only because it is an important example of a quantum speedup @xcite , but also because it is amenable to an exact analytical treatment . indeed , rather than relying on a particular form of the adiabatic theorem , our approach is based on an exact treatment of the underlying dynamics . we calculate the adiabatic error as an explicit function of the evolution time . we work out the formal @xmath2 expansion of the error often used in rigorous treatments of the adiabatic theorem through which we provide a large-@xmath0 _ polynomial _ upper bound for the adiabatic error . we shall argue that a leading order truncation of this series expansion can result in misleading estimates for the scaling of the evolution time _ vs _ system size . we draw this conclusion on the basis of a careful study of the adiabatic error , showing that it may exhibit a short-@xmath0 _ exponential _ decay , which is hidden in the formal polynomial expansion . we show that this short - time exponential decay heralds the correct scaling for the evolution time _ vs _ system size ( a quadratic speedup over classical search ) , avoiding the overestimation that results from the long - time polynomial decay , and which leads to a loss of the quantum speedup . additionally , we propose specific adiabatic evolution paths ( `` interpolations'')inspired by a procedure for minimization of time functionals for adiabatic evolution @xcite and use these to illustrate our results . we also examine the applicability of the traditional measure of the evolution time and contrast this to what we obtain from our analysis . this careful analysis enables us to show explicitly how one can reduce the adiabatic error as a function of the evolution time . the structure of this paper is as follows . we start with some general background in sec . [ ad - int ] by delineating the framework of adiabatic quantum computation , the definition of the adiabatic error , and the adiabatic theorem . in sec . [ qsham ] , we specialize to the specific problem of quantum search . there we introduce a general hamiltonian interpolation for the search problem , and analytically solve the corresponding schrdinger equation . section [ aderror ] contains the core of our results . we first derive an exact expression for the adiabatic error in subsection exactr . next , in subsection [ approx ] , we approximate this expression and show how the polynomial and exponential behaviors emerge . since estimation of the adiabatic error requires specific interpolation paths , we derive a general interpolation for the search hamiltonian in subsection ham , and investigate in detail three special cases . the adiabatic error for the general interpolation together with the special cases is estimated in subsection [ erpaths ] . in subsection [ strategy ] , we discuss a strategy for controllably reducing the adiabatic error . there we show how one can employ a freedom in the interpolation to manipulate the adiabatic error . this accounts for the performance - resource tradeoff . we conclude with a summary of the results and an outlook in sec . we begin by defining the adiabatic error as it arises in the context of aqc . we also provide a brief review of some pertinent facts concerning the traditional adiabatic theorem , also in the context of aqc . however , we note that in the sequel we shall not use the adiabatic theorem ; rather , we shall treat the dynamics directly by solving the schrdinger equation , and later enforce adiabaticity by means of a @xmath2 expansion . let us treat the total evolution time @xmath0 as a parameter and define the the scaled ( dimensionless ) time@xmath3.\]]assume that we have an @xmath4-dimensional quantum system that evolves for a total time @xmath0 under the hamiltonian @xmath5 with spectral decomposition @xmath6 \label{h}\]]where @xmath7 for @xmath8 , except that the ground state energy is separated from the rest of the spectrum by a nonvanishing gap @xmath9possible level crossing among excited eigenstates @xmath10 shall not concern us here because in the following we shall only focus on the ground state @xmath11 . we assume that the system is closed , i.e. , the evolution is governed by the schrdinger equation @xmath12where from now on dot denotes @xmath13 , and we set @xmath14 . the initial state is assumed to be the ground state , i.e. , @xmath15 _ remark_. we shall use the subscript @xmath0 to indicate the parametric dependence on @xmath0 . when symbols already have a subscript we shall avoid the additional @xmath0 subscript so as not to clutter the notation . a central quantity of interest to us is the adiabatic error @xmath16 , which quantifies the distance between the instantaneous ground state and the actual state : @xmath17note that @xmath16 is a distance and ( in)fidelity measure in their rigorous sense . indeed , the trace distance @xmath18 and fidelity @xmath19 between two arbitrary density operators @xmath20 and @xmath21 are defined as @xcite @xmath22where @xmath23 is the trace norm ( sum of singular values of @xmath24 ) . for pure states @xmath25 it is not hard to show that @xmath26 and @xmath27 . thus@xmath28 an equivalent and useful formulation of @xmath16 is the following . let @xmath29 denote the ground - state eigenprojection . the connection between the initial preparation @xmath30 and the time evolved state @xmath31 is given by @xmath32where the unitary operator @xmath33called the adiabatic intertwiner @xcite determines the evolution in the eigenspace @xmath31 and its orthogonal complement @xmath34 : @xmath35one can assign a ( dimensionless ) adiabatic hamiltonian , @xmath36 , to this evolution defined via @xmath37on the other hand , the evolution operator generated as @xmath38dictates the actual dynamics : @xmath39thus the error @xmath16 in fact measures the difference between @xmath40 and @xmath33 , or equivalently how far the unitary operator @xmath41is from @xmath42 ( identity ) . indeed , we have @xmath43which vanishes iff @xmath44 . the above formulations have presumed that the degeneracy of the ground - state eigensubspace does not change in time . nonetheless , there may be situations in which this degeneracy preservation assumption does not hold . in fact , as we shall see later , the quantum search problem we study in this paper falls into this category . let us assume that the initial state is pure , @xmath45 , but the instantaneous ground - state eigenprojection @xmath31 is not necessarily rank-@xmath46 , accounting for the possibility of degeneracy . intuitively , if the actual state @xmath47 only has components in the support of @xmath31 the algorithm has achieved its goal at the instant @xmath48 , whereas a less than full overlap denotes lack of success at this instant . the overlap of @xmath49 and the support of @xmath31 can be quantified , e.g. , with @xmath50 , whence we define the following performance error : @xmath51it is evident that @xmath52 , with @xmath53 iff the actual state has vanishing overlap with the support of the instantaneous ground - state eigenprojection , while @xmath54 iff the actual state resides anywhere in the support . we can write @xmath55 $ ] and @xmath56=\mathrm{tr}[p(0)\omega _ { t}(\tau ) p(0)\omega _ { t}^{\dag } ( \tau ) ] $ ] . using this , note the difference between @xmath57|^{2}}\]]and @xmath58}.\]]namely , in the nondegenerate case @xmath59 iff @xmath60 , indicating that the evolution was perfectly adiabatic . in the degenerate case , on the other hand , algorithmic success does not require the evolution to be perfectly adiabatic since only nonvanishing overlap with the ground - state eigensubspace is required , i.e. , @xmath54 iff @xmath61 $ ] , whereas complete failure requires the dynamics to remove any overlap with the ground - state eigensubspace , i.e. , @xmath53 iff @xmath62 $ ] . while the error as defined in eq . ( [ error - final - form ] ) is not necessarily a distance in the strict sense , it is adequate for quantifying the adiabatic error . note also that @xmath63 reduces to @xmath16 when the ground state is nondegenerate . from now on we shall be using these various expressions for the adiabatic error as appropriate in the rest of this paper . one variant of the traditionaladiabatic theorem @xcite states that given an @xmath64 and a time - dependent hamiltonian @xmath65 with a nondegenerate ground state , the adiabatic error satisfies @xmath66 , provided that @xmath67 in which @xmath68 is the standard operator norm , defined as the maximum singular value , i.e. , @xmath69 which reduces to @xmath70 for normal operators . as remarked in the introduction , this condition is hardly quantitative due to the intrinsic vagueness of @xmath1 , and has been the subject of critique ( consistent with its lack of rigor ) @xcite , justifications @xcite , and rigorous improvements avron:871,avron:872,nenciu:93,martinez , hagedornjoye:02,jrs , ohara:042319,boixo , lrh . nevertheless , it remains a useful rule of thumb , as long as it is applied with appropriate care . an immediate implication of the adiabatic theorem is that , assuming it is initialized in the ground state , the system remains close to the final ground state at @xmath71 . thus , by choosing the hamiltonian such that @xmath72 corresponds to a _ simple _ ground state @xmath73 ( simple in the sense that it is easily preparable ) , and @xmath74 represents a hamiltonian whose ground state @xmath75 identifies the solution to a computationally _ hard _ problem , one can devise an adiabatic version for the corresponding algorithmic or computational task . this is precisely the insight that led to the advent of aqc @xcite . a simple `` annealing schedule '' , or `` path '' , between @xmath72 and @xmath74 is the following linear interpolation in @xmath48 : @xmath76 in physical situations , however , one often realizes the dynamics by tuning some time - dependent control knobs or couplings @xmath77 of the hamiltonian . this suggests that a generalization of eq . ( [ aaa ] ) can be introduced by assuming access to a controllable set of non - commuting , linearly - independent primitive hamiltonians @xmath78 combined , e.g. , as @xmath79=\sum_{i=1}^{k}x_{i}(\tau ) h_{i}$ ] . further generalizations can be introduced as well @xcite . however , for our purposes in this paper we shall consider the parametrization rolandcerf , qab @xmath80with the boundary conditions @xmath81 two remarks are in order regarding aqc . ( i ) a primary goal in aqc is to make @xmath82 decrease more rapidly for a given @xmath0 and problem size , or alternatively , to make @xmath0 smaller for a given @xmath83 and problem size . often the problem size is given by @xmath4 , the dimension of the hilbert space . however , in the context of many - body quantum systems , where the hilbert space is a tensor product of subsystems ( e.g. , qubits ) , @xmath84 is the correct measure of problem size , coinciding with system size . ( ii ) the run time complexity of a quantum algorithm should be defined as @xmath85not @xmath0 @xcite . this _ regularization _ is required because of the energy - time tradeoff in quantum mechanics , in the sense that multiplication of @xmath65 in eq . ( [ cond ] ) by some positive factor @xmath86 manifests itself as dividing @xmath0 by the same factor , making it possible to decrease @xmath0 arbitrarily by choosing @xmath86 sufficiently large . this tradeoff can also be understood via the schrdinger equation ( [ eqscalt ] ) , in which the final state of a system evolving under hamiltonian @xmath65 for @xmath0 is the same as that of a system evolving under @xmath87 for @xmath88 . this ambiguity is fixed by the definition of @xmath89 as in eq . ( [ runt ] ) . scaling of @xmath90 with system size , for a given upper bound on the error @xmath91 , determines the run time complexity of the corresponding quantum algorithm . grover s quantum search algorithm @xcite performs a search for @xmath92 marked items among @xmath4 items of an unsorted database , presuming that there is an oracle for distinguishing the marked from the unmarked items . the algorithm in its original form ( @xmath93 ) comprises the following steps : ( i ) assign orthonormal quantum states ( i.e. , labels ) @xmath94 to the items , ( ii ) prepare the quantum system in the equal superposition state @xmath95 , and ( iii ) apply the grover operator encompassing the oracle repeatedly @xcite . the algorithm finds a marked item after @xmath96 calls of the oracle a quadratic speedup over the best classical algorithm and is provably optimal for any @xmath4 ( not necessarily very large ) @xcite . various generalization of the algorithm have been introduced ( e.g. , refs . @xcite ) , and it has also been implemented experimentally in a number of physical settings ( e.g. , refs . @xcite ) . an adiabatic hamiltonian version of the search algorithm was first introduced in ref . @xcite , but failed to display the expected quadratic speedup as it relied on the linear interpolation of eq . ( [ aaa ] ) . this was fixed in ref . @xcite by using a non - linear but one - dimensional interpolation with @xmath97 [ recall eq . ( 2-d - interpol ) ] , which moves fast when away from the minimum gap , but slows down near it . as shown in ref . @xcite , this result can be further improved , in the sense of a smaller adiabatic error , by adopting a two - dimensional interpolation as in eq . ( [ 2-d - interpol ] ) , @xmath98with the two projective hamiltonians @xmath99where @xmath100 is the equal superposition of all of the labelstates ( items ) , @xmath101 is the projection over the subspace @xmath102 of the marked items ( @xmath103 ) , and @xmath104 is a dimensional constant which sets the energy scale . in other words , the initial state @xmath105 is the ground state of the initial hamiltonian @xmath106 , while any state supported fully on @xmath102 is a ground state of the final ( oracle ) hamiltonian @xmath107 . note that unlike previous treatments of adiabatic quantum search @xcite , the hamiltonian @xmath107 has a degenerate ground eigenspace spanned by @xmath108 . we remark that the search hamiltonian ( [ search - ham ] ) is a member of the following class of projective hamiltonians qab , aqc - intrinsic , aharonovta - shma : @xmath109where @xmath110 , @xmath111 , with @xmath112 and @xmath113 fixed ( normalized ) vectors in the system hilbert space , for which @xmath114 is a given function of @xmath4 . in the case of the search problem , we have @xmath115 , @xmath116 , whence @xmath117 . the results of this paper can be generalized to other members of the class of projective hamiltonians . in the computational basis , in which @xmath118 , the schrdinger equation ( [ eqscalt ] ) becomes @xmath119 , \]]with the initial value @xmath120 . it can be seen from this expression that the marked components all behave similarly , as do the unmarked components . hence we can rewrite the state @xmath121 as @xmath122where the subscripts u and m denote unmarked and marked , respectively . the normalization condition now reads @xmath123by defining the ( unnormalized ) two - dimensional vector @xmath124and the ( non - hermitian ) reduced hamiltonian matrix @xmath125 in which @xmath126is the fraction of the marked items , the schrdinger equation reduces to @xmath127with the initial condition @xmath128 . therefore , not only is the parameter space of the problem two - dimensional , it is described by an effectively two - dimensional hamiltonian ( in the m - u representation ) . this reduction from the real hamiltonian @xmath129 [ eq . ( [ search - ham ] ) ] to the effective hamiltonian @xmath130 [ eq . ( [ pseudoham ] ) ] will prove useful in our analysis below . later in the paper we shall need the norm of the hamiltonian as well . this can be calculated easily from eqs . ( [ op - norm ] ) and ( [ pseudoham ] ) , and yields : @xmath131and similarly , @xmath132 the hamiltonian @xmath133 ( [ search - ham ] ) has three distinct dimensionless eigenvalues @xmath134 , where @xmath135where @xmath136is the dimensionless gap ( hence @xmath137 ) and @xmath138 is @xmath139-fold degenerate . let @xmath140 and @xmath141 denote the pauli matrices . let us define the similarity matrix@xmath142and the unitary@xmath143/2}. \label{formofa}\]]then the effective hamiltonian @xmath144 [ eq . ( [ pseudoham ] ) ] satisfies @xmath145where @xmath146is the hermitian core of @xmath147 , and we easily find that @xmath148\openone+\delta ( \tau ) \widehat{a}(\tau ) \sigma _ { z}\widehat{a}^{\dag } ( \tau ) \right\ } . \label{uni - interp}\]]this last result is remarkable : it states that , up to an overall ( time - dependent ) shift @xmath149\openone$ ] and a conformal factor @xmath150 , the reduced hamiltonian @xmath151 is a _ unitary interpolation _ @xmath152 @xcite . we will exploit this observation below . the non - hermitian reduced hamiltonian @xmath144 and its hermitian core @xmath151 have the same set of eigenvalues @xmath153 , and we have the spectral resolution@xmath154where @xmath155and @xmath156 are the eigenvectors of @xmath157 , corresponding to the eigenvalues @xmath158 . the unitary operator @xmath159 acts as a reduced adiabatic intertwiner [ eq . ( [ ad - int ] ) ] , in the sense that for the reduced projection @xmath160 we have @xmath161 _ remark . _ we emphasize that throughout the paper hat and tilde denote states or operators in the reduced representation ; the only exception is @xmath162 . in solving the schrdinger equation and calculating the adiabatic error @xmath82 , it is more convenient to work with the normalized state @xmath163equation ( [ sch-1 ] ) now becomes @xmath164with @xmath165 . solving this equation results in @xmath166 in which @xmath167\ ] ] is the time - ordered reduced evolution operator . having observed that the grover search problem can be cast as a conformal unitary interpolation , we outline a general , systematic approach for solving the corresponding class of schrdinger equations using the dyson series expansion @xcite . consider as a specialization of the general time - dependent hamiltonian of eq . ( [ h ] ) the conformal unitary interpolation hamiltonian @xmath168 in which @xmath169is the spectral decomposition of the ( traceless ) initial hamiltonian @xmath72 , the unitary operator @xmath33 satisfies the adiabatic schrdinger equation ( [ ad - schr ] ) generated by the adiabatic hamiltonian @xmath170 @xcite , and ( the dimensionless gap ) @xmath171 is a smooth function with the initial value @xmath172 . it is also useful to think of the time - dependent hamiltonian @xmath5 [ eq . ( [ h_t ] ) ] as the adiabatic interaction picture hamiltonian , though normally an interaction picture transformation does not involve a time - dependent prefactor such as @xmath173 . it is evident that the eigenvalues and eigenprojections of @xmath5 satisfy @xmath174equation ( [ spect ] ) implies that the spectrum of @xmath5 evolves conformally with @xmath150 , i.e. , all the eigenvalues are multiplied by the same factor , while eq . ( [ ap : p ] ) implies that the eigenprojections are unitarily connected , and the degeneracy is constant in time . comparison of eqs . ( [ ad - int ] ) and ( [ ap : p ] ) reveals that @xmath175 and here too , @xmath33 plays the role of the adiabatic intertwiner . rather than solving the schrdinger equation @xmath176we solve the equation of motion for the adiabatic interaction picture propagator [ cf . ( [ omega ] ) ] @xmath177this provides a more direct tool for the calculation of the adiabatic error [ eq . ( [ def : ad - err ] ) ] . let us define @xmath178note that @xmath179 has dimensions of energy while @xmath180 is dimensionless . in the adiabatic interaction picture the ( dimensionless ) perturbation is @xmath181 , i.e. , it follows from eqs . ( [ ad - schr ] ) and ( [ wdot ] ) that @xmath182\omega _ { t}(\tau ) . \label{omega - dott}\]]we also define the two unitaries @xmath183 and @xmath184 through the following equations : @xmath185it is easily seen that @xmath186 also satisfies eq . ( [ omega - dott ] ) , so that @xmath187 to simplify the analysis , we only consider hamiltonians for which @xmath188 in which @xmath189 is an integrable function and @xmath190 is a constant ( @xmath48-independent ) and traceless operator belonging to the space of linear operators acting on the system hilbert space . thus from eq . ( [ h_1 ] ) we obtain @xmath191 note that , from eqs . ( [ h_0 ] ) and ( [ v_0 ] ) , @xmath192where @xmath193 is shorthand for @xmath194we shall use the similar shorthand @xmath195wherever convenient . inserting @xmath196 into eq . ( [ v_1 ] ) yields @xmath197 in which the kernel @xmath198 is defined as @xmath199equation ( [ v_1-eq ] ) , or equivalently the volterra equation @xmath200can be solved iteratively , yielding the dyson series @xmath201 now we apply the method described above to the adiabatic quantum search problem . recall that we are working with the reduced states and operators ( hence the hat over all reduced quantities , except the gap @xmath162 [ eq . ( [ gap ] ) ] ) comparing eq . ( [ hhat ] ) with eq . ( [ h_t ] ) implies that @xmath202after excluding the trivial term @xmath203 from @xmath204 . similarly , eqs . ( [ formofa ] ) and ( [ h_a ] ) yield @xmath205\right ] \notag \\ & \overset{\text{(\ref{gap})}}{=}&\sqrt{r(1-r)}\frac{x_{1}\dot{x}_{2}-\dot{x}_{1}x_{2}}{\delta ^{2 } } , \label{h_a } \\ \widehat{\xi } & = & \sigma _ { y}.\end{aligned}\]]as a result , from eqs . ( [ v_0-form ] ) and ( [ kernel ] ) we obtain @xmath206where the phase factor @xmath207~\mathrm{d}\tau ^{\prime } \]]compensates for the removal of the trivial term from @xmath208 . some simple algebra then yields @xmath209where , for @xmath210 , the dyson series terms are @xmath211and @xmath212 . this completes the derivation of @xmath213 in the previous section , we worked out the solution to the schrdinger equation in the quantum search problem . having collected the pertinent ingredients , we now return to calculating our main object of interest , @xmath16 . after deriving an exact formula for the error , we proceed with approximating it in the large system - size limit , identified with @xmath214 . we start with the well - known polynomial expansion of @xmath82 in terms of @xmath0 , which works well for large times . in refining this result , we show that in fact two regimes are discernible in the behavior of @xmath82 vs @xmath0 : ( i ) the onset of _ exponential _ decrease , followed by ( ii ) a _ polynomial _ tail . this dichotomy will appear to be crucial in a correct characterization of the scaling of the run time of the algorithm with system size . the exact behavior of the error in the algorithm depends strongly on the form of the interpolation one chooses for the hamiltonian . inspired by our earlier study aiming at minimizing the adiabatic error in quantum algorithms @xcite , we shall suggest a general class of interpolations , which includes three specific cases already studied in the literature . next , we investigate the specific behavior of the adiabatic error for each interpolation , separately . finally , we shall suggest methods for suppressing the adiabatic error even further . recall that the adiabatic quantum search hamiltonian ( [ search - ham ] ) has a nondegenerate ground state @xmath105 at the initial time @xmath215 , whereas the ground - state eigenprojection at the final time @xmath216 is @xmath217 , which is @xmath92-fold degenerate . here , any full superposition of the form @xmath218 will work equally well , whereas if @xmath219 does not have complete support over @xmath217 then this indicates that the algorithm has partially failed . hence , following the discussion in sec . ad - int [ eq . ( [ error - final - form ] ) ] , the adiabatic error at the final time is determined by @xmath220 an equivalent formulation can be obtained for the two - dimensional reduction we discussed in sec . [ qsham ] . in this representation @xmath221 is replaced by @xmath222 [ eq . ( [ state - red ] ) ] ; similarly , the instantaneous ground state is represented by the nondegenerate state @xmath223 [ eq . ( [ phi - hat ] ) ] . thus we can employ the error formula appropriate for the non - degenerate case [ eq . ( [ def : ad - err2 ] ) ] , whereby @xmath224 in which @xmath225 is given by eq . ( [ o - hat ] ) , and in the last line we used the unitarity of @xmath225 . the equality of eqs . ( [ er ] ) and ( [ ad - error ] ) is immediately seen from @xmath226 inserting @xmath225noting eqs . ( [ v0 ] ) and ( [ v1])into eq . ( [ ad - error ] ) yields the following _ exact _ expression for the adiabatic error at the final time : @xmath227which is upperbounded by @xmath228from the above equations we can in principle calculate the adiabatic error or its bound given that we know all @xmath229 s . _ the value of @xmath230 will be important later . in this case , we have @xmath231 , thence eq . ( [ ad - error ] ) yields @xmath232 in which we used the boundary conditions ( [ bc-2 ] ) in @xmath233 . this relation is valid for any interpolation that satisfies the boundary conditions . an exact calculation of the adiabatic error from eq . ( [ error ] ) can be challenging because of the infinite number of terms in the summand and the fact that each term contains a multiple integral . to alleviate this difficulty , in this subsection we approximate the upper bound on @xmath82 from eq . ( [ error ] ) from the first few @xmath234 s , and argue that this suffices for most algorithmic purposes . we start from an expansion in powers of @xmath2 , based on integration by parts , and explain its limitations . we then provide more careful analyses , based on the residue theorem and on the stationary phase method , both of which lead to an exponential error estimate . the most common rigorous adiabatic approximation employs an expansion in powers of @xmath2 , presuming that @xmath0 is large @xcite . let us now show how one can systematically expand the adiabatic error as a polynomial in@xmath2 by extracting powers of @xmath2 from each term @xmath235 through integration by parts . from the identity @xmath236 [ valid for any differentiable function @xmath237 , we obtain the following relation by integration by parts : @xmath238 . \notag\end{aligned}\]]notice how this extracted a @xmath2 in front of the first term . in the second integral on the right hand side we can iterate the same trick of replacing the exponential with its derivative ; which generates @xmath239 and higher order terms . this provides a systematic way for generating @xmath240 expansions of exponential integrals , as we shall see more specifically below for the @xmath235 s . using eq . ( [ ibp - identity ] ) , we obtain @xmath241 . \label{i1}\end{aligned}\]]applying once more the exponential identity ( [ ibp - identity ] ) for the second integral above gives rise to @xmath242 terms ; whence , @xmath243+o\bigl(\frac{1}{t^{2}}\bigr ) , \notag \\ & & \end{aligned}\]]i.e . , @xmath244 . in analogous fashion , for @xmath245 we obtain @xmath246 , \notag \\ & & \end{aligned}\]]from which @xmath247-\frac{\widehat{h}_{a}(0)}{(jt)^{2}}\bigl[\frac{\widehat{h}_{a}(\tau ) e^{-ijt\int^{\tau } \delta } } { \delta ( \tau ) } \notag \\ & & -\widehat{h}_{a}(0)\bigr]+o\bigl(\frac{1}{t^{3}}\bigr ) , \label{i2}\end{aligned}\]]and @xmath248 . by induction , one can conclude from eq . ( [ inttran ] ) that @xcite @xmath249for @xmath250 . thus , from eq . ( [ error ] ) the adiabatic error bound becomes @xmath251+o\bigl(\frac{1}{t^{2}}\bigr ) . \label{addelta}\end{aligned}\]]this relation can be simplified further . from the boundary conditions ( bc-1 ) and ( [ bc-2 ] ) , we obtain @xmath252 [ eq . ( [ gap ] ) ] , @xmath253 and @xmath254 [ eq . ( [ h_a ] ) ] . thus eq . ( addelta ) reduces to @xmath255+o\bigl(\frac{1}{t^{2}}\bigr ) . \label{er - simp}\]]proceeding in a similar manner , one can in principle obtain the exact form of the coefficient of each @xmath256 term , for arbitrary @xmath250 . _ remarks . _ let us make some remarks regarding the polynomial expansion , and in particular eq . ( [ er - simp ] ) . \(i ) notice that often the @xmath240 series is _ truncated _ after the first or at most the second order term , on the basis of the assumption that for sufficiently large @xmath0 the first couple of terms should give a reliable and accurate upper bound . however , without correctly defining what large @xmath0 means , a truncation after the first few terms might be unjustifiable . in fact , in addition to @xmath0 , the system size @xmath84 ( introduced here through @xmath257 ) and the gap @xmath150 are also key players in the estimation of @xmath16 . the minimum ( system - size dependent ) gap @xmath258 works in general as a bottleneck for the performance of quantum algorithms ( e.g. , refs . farhi1,farhi2,latorre , qab , schaller ) . specifically , where the gap closes or becomes small , the adiabatic approximation may not hold , indicative of a quantum phase transition ( in the thermodynamic limit ) sachdev : book , latorre , schutzhold:06,schaller2,aminchoi . this implies that the coefficients of some high order @xmath256 terms might have a stronger gap dependence than those of lower order terms . with this caveat , neglecting those higher order terms is not always possible . in fact , it is not difficult to see that the coefficient of the @xmath239 has a @xmath259 dependence ( see also ref . @xcite ) , stronger than the @xmath260 dependence of the coefficient of the @xmath2 term in @xmath261 [ eq . ( [ h_a ] ) ] . \(ii ) for similar reasons , an estimate of @xmath0 arising from @xmath262 ( for a given @xmath83 ) along with a truncated @xmath240 expansion , is not always reliable . we shall see this explicitly later in this section . \(iii ) one might argue that @xmath263 results from an energy - time uncertainty relation such as @xmath264 [ presuming @xmath82 is directly related to the uncertainty in measurement of energy ] . however , this argument is not rigorous and should not be considered as a replacement for the analysis leading to the @xmath240 expansion ( unless justified carefully ) . a rigorous energy - time uncertainty relation is given , for example , by the mandelstam - tamm inequality @xmath265\times t_{\psi } [ k]\geq 1/2,\]]in which @xmath266\equiv \delta _ { \psi } [ k]/|\mathrm{d}\langle \psi @xmath267\equiv \sqrt{\langle \psi |x^{2}|\psi \rangle -\langle \psi |x|\psi \rangle ^{2}}$ ] @xcite . hence , as is well known the naive relation @xmath268\times t\approx 1 $ ] should be treated with care . strictly , a relation between @xmath269 $ ] and @xmath82 can be constructed as the following . note that we can write @xmath270where @xmath271 is orthogonal to @xmath272 [ eq . [ ad - error ] ] . hence , after some algebra we obtain @xmath273\bigl|_{\tau = 1}}+o(\delta _ { \text{ad}}^{2 } ) . \hskip-3 mm & & \end{aligned}\]]despite this relation , connecting @xmath0 and @xmath274 $ ] is not straightforward . although using different versions of the energy - time uncertainty relation @xcite may provide additional insights , we shall not further pursue this here . [ [ residue - theorem - analysis ] ] residue theorem analysis + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + in the previous subsection we used integration by parts to arrive at a polynomial expansion . let us now show that an alternative , more careful analysis based on the residue theorem of complex analysis , reveals that the adiabatic error decays _ exponentially _ for sufficiently short times . in some sense , this exponential behavior is reminiscent of the well - known landau - zener formula for two - state quantum systems @xcite , which in its simplest form states that the _ tunneling probability _ @xmath275 from @xmath276 to @xmath277 , for the hamiltonian @xmath278 , is @xmath279we notice that @xmath280 is in fact intimately related to @xmath82 in this simple two - state case , as @xmath281the exponentiality of the adiabatic error _ vs _ time and ( some power of ) the gap has been previously established in generality in rigorous treatments of the adiabatic theorem nenciu:93,martinez , hagedornjoye:02,lrh ( see also ref . @xcite in a more restricted setting ) . in what follows we focus on @xmath282 ; higher order terms can be treated similarly . we start from eq . ( [ error ] ) , whence @xmath283here denotes the higher order terms @xmath284 ( @xmath210 ) , whose neglect we justify below in the specific examples we discuss . an exponential error term can be obtained , for example , by extending the integral to the complex time plane and using an appropriate closed contour for the application of the residue theorem @xcite . a precursor to this treatment of the adiabatic error can be found , e.g. , in ref . @xcite . if @xmath285 ( @xmath286 ) is not constant it has poles at points @xmath287 where the gap vanishes : @xmath288 [ eq . ( [ h_a ] ) ] . from eq . ( [ gap ] ) , we obtain @xmath289 , or ( assuming @xmath290 ) @xmath291where @xmath292 . the poles @xmath287 can in principle be obtained by inverting this relation for a given interpolation @xmath293 . note , however , that there might exist other singularities ( typically at infinity ) arising from the exponential @xmath294 in eq . ( h1-int ) . therefore , estimating the integral ( [ h1-int ] ) requires finding all contributing singularities in a suitably chosen contour @xmath295 in the complex @xmath48-plane . the value of the integral @xmath296 can now be obtained by calculating the residues of the integrand at the poles enclosed inside the contour , @xmath297}\widehat{h}_{a}(z)e^{ijt\int^{z}\delta } \mathrm{d}z\bigr| . \label{tmp - eq-1}\end{aligned}\]]for example , if the poles @xmath287 are _ simple _ and arise from @xmath298 , calculating the integral becomes straightforward . recall that @xmath299 [ eq . ( [ h_a ] ) ] and the residue of a rational function @xmath300 at a simple pole @xmath301 is given by @xmath302 @xcite . thus , in this case we obtain @xmath303= \label{residue } \\ \hskip-5 mm & & \frac{\sqrt{r(1-r)}\dot{x}_{21}(z_{0})e^{ijt\int^{z_{0}}\delta } } { \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}z}\bigl[\bigl(1-x_{21}(z)\bigr)^{2}+4rx_{21}(z)\bigr]\bigl|_{z_{0}}}\approx \frac{1}{4i}e^{ijt\int^{z_{0}}\delta } \notag,\end{aligned}\]]where in the last line we assumed @xmath304 . note that this computation of the residues does not necessarily hold when @xmath305 , or when @xmath287 is at infinity . this yields that an exponentially decreasing contribution emerges from @xmath306 $ ] of the exponential within the integrand perhaps in addition to a generically non - exponentially - decreasing term . thus , from eq . ( [ residue ] ) we find @xmath307 } + r_{t}^{\prime } ( 1 ) , \label{xx}\]]where @xmath308 results from the non - exponential contribution of the residue at @xmath287 and @xmath309 encapsulates the collective nonvanishing contribution of other segments of the contour as well as other non - exponentially - decreasing contributions emerging from the terms in eq . ( [ h1-int ] ) . ) , and from eq . ( [ tmp - eq-1 ] ) , we obtain : @xmath310 . this is in good agreement with eq . ( [ t=0-eq ] ) when @xmath311 and @xmath312 . ] [ [ stationary - phase - analysis ] ] stationary phase analysis + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + an alternative and complementary approach for obtaining the exponential contribution to the adiabatic error is to use the stationary phase method . this method is appropriate for obtaining asymptotic value of complex integrals of the form @xmath313 , where @xmath314 is a large number and @xmath315 is a path for the integration . assuming @xmath316 is a slowly - varying function over @xmath315 and @xmath317 is an analytic function , one can argue that the major contribution to the integral comes from the point(s ) @xmath287 at which @xmath317 has a minimum , whence hayek : book @xmath318 to apply this result to eq . ( [ h1-int ] ) , we replace @xmath317 and @xmath319 with @xmath320 and @xmath285 , respectively . accordingly , @xmath287 is where @xmath321 . the minimum point @xmath287 is often a complex number . in fact , in quantum many - body situations , the gap @xmath162 is a nonnegative function , often with a nonvanishing minimum , which becomes zero in the thermodynamic limit @xcite . in such cases , @xmath317 does indeed have a minimum . it is also required that @xmath322 be finite [ this of course is not satisfied when @xmath323 has a pole or singularity at @xmath287 ] . if all these conditions are satisfied , eqs . ( [ h1-int ] ) and ( [ spm ] ) yield @xmath325 } , \label{st - ph}\]]as we wished . this relation complements eq . ( [ residue ] ) in that it may be applicable when eq . ( [ residue ] ) is not . [ [ discussion ] ] discussion + + + + + + + + + + the emergence of the exponential dependence of @xmath326 on @xmath0 [ eqs . ( [ xx ] ) and ( [ st - ph ] ) ] in contrast to the polynomial dependence [ eq . ( [ er - simp ] ) ] is remarkable , as it indicates a much faster decay of the adiabatic error than what is suggested by the standard @xmath2 expansion . in the exponential regime it suffices that @xmath0 be large compared to @xmath327 $ ] , or roughly @xcite:@xmath328this is a less stringent condition than the standard condition ( [ cond ] ) or its more rigorous counterparts avron:871,avron:872,nenciu:93,martinez , hagedornjoye:02,jrs , ohara:042319,boixo , lrh , involving higher powers of the gap . the crossover point @xmath329 between the exponential and the polynomial regimes can be estimated by solving @xmath330}\approx \frac{\sqrt{r}}{jt^{\star } } \bigl(|\dot{x}_{1}(1)|+|\dot{x}_{2}(0)|\bigr ) , \label{crossover}\]]in which @xmath331 is a non - exponential prefactor given by eq . ( [ xx ] ) or ( [ st - ph ] ) . if @xmath332 ( @xmath333 ) the exponential ( polynomial ) behavior prevails . later in this section , we show explicitly that the expected run time for the quantum search algorithm is often given by the exponential contribution ; the polynomial regime may _ overestimate _ the minimum run time required for reasonable accuracy . since the scaling of the run time depends on which interpolation we choose for the hamiltonian , in the following we shall obtain specific interpolations by employing some recently developed results for ( partial ) minimization of the adiabatic error @xcite . the set of available control knobs ( @xmath334 ) , as well as the way one varies them , determine the specific hamiltonian interpolation implemented in a laboratory setting . theoretically , though , there are various ways by which one can obtain families of hamiltonians for an adiabatic quantum algorithm . one natural choice is interpolations which minimize physical cost . for example , in the setting of refs . rolandcerf , qab , time functionals were constructed from a _ local _ version of the adiabatic condition ( [ cond ] ) , whose minimization resulted in a set of euler - lagrange equations for the underlying interpolations . a different method was suggested in ref . @xcite , where it was shown that in the standard @xmath240 expansion of the adiabatic error @xmath16 [ general counterpart of eq . ( [ addelta ] ) or ( [ er - simp ] ) ] , the coefficient of the @xmath2 term has a _ geometric _ part , in a differential geometric sense . specifically , this geometric coefficient , in terms of the ground - state eigenprojection , @xmath31 is@xmath335\bigr\vert~\mathrm{d}\tau ^{\prime } . \label{geometric}\]]minimizing this coefficient yields adiabatic geodesic interpolations , which partially decrease @xmath336 for a given @xmath0 . it follows from standard variational calculus @xcite that the geodesic interpolations satisfy the following equation @xmath337\bigr\vert\bigl|_{\mathbf{x}_{\text{geo}}(\tau ) } = \text{const . } , \label{geo - eq}\]]where the constant is chosen to satisfy boundary conditions . we adopt this method in the following and derive geodesic interpolations for the adiabatic quantum search . in the reduced two - dimensional representation , @xmath338 is replaced with @xmath339 . thus we have @xmath340noting with the help of eqs . ( [ formofa ] ) , ( [ phi - hat ] ) , and ( [ h_a ] ) that @xmath341we find @xmath342\bigr\vert & = & \sqrt{2\langle \dot{\widehat{\phi } } _ { -}|\dot{\widehat{\phi } } _ { -}\rangle } \notag \\ & \overset{\text{(\ref{phi - hat})}}{=}&\sqrt{2}|\widehat{h}_{a}|.\end{aligned}\]]hence , according to eq . ( [ geo - eq ] ) , a class of adiabatic geodesics can be obtained from @xmath343which implies that the adiabatic hamiltonian @xmath344 is in fact constant . in other words , from @xmath345 [ eq . ( [ formofa ] ) ] we can see that @xmath346this equation suggests that a more general choice for the intertwiner @xmath347 can be obtained by @xmath348 , for some arbitrary differentiable @xmath349 ; i.e. , @xmath350 . in terms of @xmath323 , this translates into choosing @xmath351 . in terms of the geometric factor ( geometric ) , this simply means that on the geodesic , the time is determined by @xmath352 rather than @xmath48 . to see this , note that @xmath353\bigr\vert~\mathrm{d}\tau ^{\prime } & = & \int_{0}^{\theta ( \tau ) } \bigl\vert\lbrack \partial _ { \theta } p(\theta ) , p(\theta ) ] \bigr\vert~\mathrm{d}\theta , \notag \\ & & \end{aligned}\]]which in turn , from variational calculus , gives the following equation for the geodesics : @xmath354\bigr\vert\bigl|_{\mathbf{x}_{\text{geo}}(\theta ( \tau ) ) } = \mathrm{const . } \label{geo - eq2}\]]hence , @xmath355\bigr\vert & = & \frac{1}{\dot{\theta}}\bigl\vert\lbrack \dot{\widehat{p}}_{-},\widehat{p}_{-}]\bigr\vert \notag \\ & = & \sqrt{2}\frac{|\widehat{h}_{a}|}{\dot{\theta } } \notag \\ & = & \mathrm{const.},\end{aligned}\]]where we assumed @xmath356 , @xmath357 , and @xmath358 . as a result , we choose the adiabatic geodesic satisfying @xmath359 we remark that introducing an arbitrary nondecreasing function @xmath360 will serve as more than a generalization . in fact , we show below that @xmath349 allows us to substantially enhance the suppression of the adiabatic error . for example , choosing a @xmath349 such that it is a differentiable function of @xmath48 ( up to some controllable order , say , @xmath361 ) , with vanishing derivatives ( up to the same order @xmath361 ) at the initial and final times , can suppress the adiabatic error [ up to @xmath362 . this property which comes at the relatively small price of sufficient control at the beginning and end of the dynamics may have immediate applications in experimental realizations of quantum annealing and aqc . the above geodesic equation can be solved analytically . recall that @xmath363 , with the boundary values @xmath364 and @xmath365 [ eqs . ( [ bc-1 ] ) and ( [ bc-2 ] ) ] . then from eq . ( h_a ) we find @xmath366^{2}+4rx_{21}(\tau ) } = \varphi \dot{\theta}(\tau ) , \label{weak}\]]the solution to this equation can be written as follows : @xmath367}{\sin [ 2(1-\theta ( \tau ) ) \varphi ] } , \label{relat}\]]where we must choose @xmath368.\]]observe that @xmath369 has the following symmetry : @xmath370which is satisfied , for example , by requiring @xmath371equations ( [ relat ] ) and ( [ symmetry ] ) identify a two - dimensional interpolation for the quantum search hamiltonian . notice that , given eq . ( [ relat ] ) , we can also add another relation ( satisfying the boundary conditions ) so as to find other classes of interpolation . for example , we can choose @xmath372 in which @xmath373 can be a smooth function with the boundary values @xmath374 ; e.g. , @xmath375 or @xmath376 . choosing a form for @xmath373 corresponds to assuming a given @xmath377 [ eq . ( [ hnorm ] ) ] , which implies a given control over the maximum amount of the available energy in the system . thus , eqs . ( [ relat ] ) and ( [ bc-3 ] ) yield @xmath378}{2\sin ( \varphi ) \cos [ ( 1 - 2\theta ( \tau ) ) \varphi ] } \notag \\ & = & \frac{a(\tau ) } { 2}\bigl[1+\cot ( \varphi ) \tan [ ( 1 - 2\theta ( \tau ) ) \varphi ] \bigr ] , \label{x1 } \\ \hskip-6 mm x_{2}\bigl(\theta ( \tau ) \bigr ) & = & \frac{a(\tau ) \sin [ 2\theta ( \tau ) \varphi ] } { 2\sin ( \varphi ) \cos [ ( 1 - 2\theta ( \tau ) ) \varphi ] } \notag \\ & = & \frac{a(\tau ) } { 2}\bigl[1-\cot ( \varphi ) \tan [ ( 1 - 2\theta ( \tau ) ) \varphi ] \bigr ] . \label{x2}\end{aligned}\]]note that this interpolation also satisfies the symmetry ( [ symmetry ] ) . it is clear that one can consider other auxiliary or control conditions over the hamiltonian different from eq . ( [ bc-3 ] ) . in the following , we address three special cases : ( i ) the hamiltonian interpolation is linear in time , namely , @xmath379 ; ( ii ) hamiltonians with constant norm ; specifically , @xmath380 ; and , ( iii ) hamiltonians with constant gap ; specifically , @xmath381 . if we choose @xmath382,\]]and assume @xmath383 , from eqs . ( [ x1 ] ) and ( [ x2 ] ) we obtain the simple linear interpolation @xmath384 let us assume @xmath385 . the constraint @xmath386 implies that @xmath387 [ eq . ( [ hnorm ] ) ] , or equivalently @xmath388 [ eq . ( [ bc-3 ] ) ] . hence , in this case from eqs . ( [ x1 ] ) and ( [ x2 ] ) we obtain @xmath389 , \label{rcpath1 } \\ x_2\bigl(\theta(\tau ) \bigr ) = \frac{1}{2}-\frac{\sqrt{r}}{2\sqrt{1-r}}\tan\bigl[\bigl(1 - 2\theta(\tau)\bigr)\varphi\bigr ] . \label{rcpath2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this interpolation is a generalization of the interpolation obtained in refs . @xcite by using a local adiabatic condition . rather than assuming condition ( [ bc-3 ] ) , here we consider the case in which the gap is constant , e.g. , @xmath390 . hence combining the following relation [ eq . ( [ gap ] ) ] : @xmath391^{2}+4rx_{1}\bigl(\theta ( \tau ) \bigr)x_{2}\bigl(\theta ( \tau ) \bigr)=1,\]]and eq . ( [ relat ] ) yields @xmath392 , \label{constgapx1 } \\ x_{2}\bigl(\theta ( \tau ) \bigr ) & = & \frac{1}{2\sqrt{r(1-r)}}\sin \bigl[2\theta ( \tau ) \varphi \bigr ] . \label{constgapx2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] having given a general recipe for adiabatic interpolations and having obtained three particular interpolations , we proceed to compute the adiabatic error for each of these interpolations . our main interest here is to analyze how the run time scales with system size for each of these three interpolations . we shall also contrast the result for each case with the estimate obtained from the traditional adiabatic theorem . as a result , we will demonstrate that the traditional adiabatic condition is not always reliable for estimation of the minimum run time ( given an error threshold ) , whereas the time we obtain from the exponential regime of the adiabatic error is in fact accurate . a remarkable feature of this result is that the estimated times ( in an appropriate sense ) need not be very large . for the linear interpolation @xmath393 , obtained by numerically solving the corresponding schrdinger equation , for @xmath394 . the dashed lines represent the exponential fits @xmath395 [ eq . ( [ b2 ] ) ] and the polynomial fit @xmath396 [ eq . ( [ b1 ] ) ] , from left to right , respectively.,width=321 ] in this case , @xmath397 , so that we have @xmath398hence the traditional adiabatic condition ( [ cond ] ) implies that , for @xmath262 , we should have @xmath399or equivalently from eq . ( [ runt ] ) , @xmath400that is , that the adiabatic quantum search with a linear interpolation hamiltonian requires a run time @xmath401 [ recall @xmath402 , hence performing no better than a classical search algorithm @xcite . note , however , that if we truncate the @xmath240 expansion ( er - simp ) after the first term , in the @xmath214 limit we obtain @xmath403i.e . , @xmath404 , which is not the right estimate . this illustrates the caveat we discussed in sec . [ aderror ] . now we employ the results we developed in sec . [ aderror ] for estimating the exponential regime of @xmath82 [ eq . ( [ xx ] ) ] . it is obvious that for this case there exist no point at which both @xmath405 and @xmath406 vanish . thus , the pole @xmath287 ( where the gap vanishes ) is obtained simply by inverting eq . ( [ poles ] ) , i.e. , @xmath407the integral over the gap can be evaluated explicitly as @xmath408 = \frac{\pi r}{8\sqrt{1-r}}.\]]for the integral ( [ residue ] ) , we choose the contour @xmath295 to be a rectangle composed of : ( i ) @xmath409 the real line @xmath410 $ ] , ( ii ) @xmath411 , the line connecting @xmath412 to @xmath413 , ( iii ) @xmath414 , the line connecting @xmath413 to @xmath415 , and ( iv ) @xmath416 , the line connecting @xmath413 to @xmath417 . from the form of @xmath323 , we can easily see that @xmath418 [ because @xmath419 and @xmath420 [ because @xmath421 . this means that for @xmath214 and in the regime in which @xmath422 gives the dominant contribution to @xmath82 , the error exhibits an exponentially decreasing behavior as @xmath423 in this regime , for @xmath262 it is sufficient to have @xmath424whereby we can estimate the following run time : @xmath425this result agrees perfectly with the expected @xmath401 scaling , with a _ logarithmic _ ( rather than inverse ) dependence on the error @xmath83 . figure [ fig.linear ] depicts the adiabatic error vs time , calculated by solving the corresponding schrdinger equation numerically . it illustrates the exponential and polynomial regimes . _ here we could not use eq . ( [ st - ph ] ) because @xmath323 has poles @xmath426 . here for simplicity , we assume @xmath427 . from eqs . ( rcpath1 ) and ( [ rcpath2 ] ) , the gap ( [ gap ] ) is @xmath428 , \label{g - c - n}\]]with the minimum value @xmath429 at @xmath430 , and eqs . ( [ hnorm ] ) and ( [ hdotnorm ] ) yield @xmath431,\end{aligned}\]]the latter with the maximum value @xmath432 at @xmath433 . thus , according to the traditional adiabatic condition ( [ cond ] ) , in order to have @xmath262 , we should require @xmath434and in turn , @xmath435which is larger than the expected @xmath436 grover - like scaling rolandcerf , qab . for the constant - norm interpolation [ eqs . ( [ rcpath1 ] ) and ( rcpath2 ) ] , obtained by numerically solving the corresponding schrdinger equation , for @xmath437 . the dashed lines represent the exponential fit @xmath438 [ eq . ( [ dellin ] ) ] and the polynomial fit @xmath439 [ eq . ( [ c1])].,width=321 ] on the other hand , truncation of the corresponding @xmath240 expansion ( [ er - simp ] ) results in @xmath440 in which we used @xmath441 [ eqs . ( [ rcpath1 ] ) and ( [ rcpath2 ] ) ] and @xmath442 . hence , @xmath443which of course is incorrect . now we show that a careful treatment of @xmath282 , as in sec . [ aderror ] , results in an exponential adiabatic error , and gives the correct scaling for the run time . here , we note that @xmath444 [ eq . ( [ h_a ] ) ] , from which @xmath445 ^{-i\frac{jt\sqrt{r}}{2\varphi } } \mathrm{d}\tau ^{\prime } , \notag \\ & & \end{aligned}\]]where we used the identity @xmath446 . for @xmath214 [ @xmath447 , this gives rise to @xmath448^{-i\frac{jt\sqrt{r}}{2\varphi } } \mathrm{d}\tau ^{\prime } \right\vert \notag \label{integralbeta } \\ & \approx & \frac{\pi } { 2}\int_{0}^{1}[\tan ( \pi \tau ^{\prime } /2)]^{-i\frac{jt\sqrt{r}}{2\varphi } } \mathrm{d}\tau ^{\prime } + o(\sqrt{r } ) . \notag \\ & & \end{aligned}\]]further simplification can be obtained by using the identity @xmath449^{-i\alpha } \mathrm{d}\tau ^{\prime } = \mathrm{sech}(\pi \alpha /2)$ ] ( for @xmath450 ) and the inequality @xmath451 ( for @xmath452 ) ; hence , @xmath453this is the corresponding _ exponential _ behavior for the constant - norm hamiltonian interpolation . it implies that for @xmath66 it is sufficient to have @xmath454or equivalently , @xmath455which is the expected grover - like @xmath436 scaling rolandcerf , qab , but with a logarithmic dependence on the error . although eq . ( [ residue ] ) may not be applicable to the case of constant - norm interpolation ( for @xmath323 does not have any singularity ) , we can apply eq . ( [ st - ph ] ) instead . in fact , eq . ( g - c - n ) implies that @xmath456hence , @xmath408 = \frac{\pi \sqrt{r}}{4\varphi } \overset{r\ll 1}{\approx } \frac{\sqrt{r}}{2},\]]and in turn [ eq . ( [ st - ph ] ) ] @xmath457with some non - exponentially decreasing @xmath458 . this results in a scaling similar to eq . ( [ mmm ] ) . in this case [ @xmath381 ] , from eqs . ( [ hnorm ] ) , ( [ hdotnorm ] ) , ( [ constgapx1 ] ) , and ( [ constgapx2 ] ) we obtain @xmath460|/\sqrt{r } , \\ & \vert \dot{h}(\tau ) \vert /j=&\varphi |\sin [ ( 1 - 2\tau ) \varphi ] |/\sqrt{r}. \label{temp1}\end{aligned}\]]hence , according to the traditional adiabatic condition ( [ cond ] ) , in order to have @xmath262 , it is sufficient to have @xmath461whereby @xmath462which is quadratically larger than the grover - like @xmath436 scaling . for the constant - gap interpolation [ eqs . ( [ constgapx1 ] ) and ( constgapx2 ) ] . here , @xmath463 ( blue and green , respectively ) , and the dashed lines ( red ) show the @xmath464 envelopes . the points @xmath465 , where @xmath466 , are given by eq . ( [ t_k]).,width=321 ] on the other hand , noting that @xmath441 [ eqs . ( [ constgapx1 ] ) and ( [ constgapx2 ] ) ] , the truncation of the corresponding @xmath240 expansion after the first term yields @xmath467or equivalently @xmath468clearly , eqs . ( [ rr1 ] ) and ( [ rr2 ] ) are not in agreement . it is interesting to note that here one can in fact solve the schrdinger equation exactly . the operator @xmath469 [ eq . ( [ o - hat ] ) ] satisfies the following equation : @xmath470 in which @xmath471}{\sqrt{r}}\openone+\sigma _ { z}\right ) -\varphi \sigma _ { y}. \notag \\ & & \end{aligned}\]]since @xmath472 is time - independent , integration of eq . ( [ temp3 ] ) is straightforward : @xmath473 . \notag \\ & & \end{aligned}\]]thus , from eq . ( [ ad - error ] ) the adiabatic error is exactly @xmath474 figure [ fig.constg ] depicts @xmath82 for two different values of @xmath257 . note that for large evolution times @xmath475 , we obtain @xmath476this implies that , in the @xmath214 limit , in order for @xmath262 it is sufficient to have @xmath477which is the grover - like scaling @xmath436 . notice that in this limit the adiabatic error behaves inverse - linearly , @xmath478 , which is in perfect agreement with eq . ( [ temp4 ] ) . in addition , we observe that there exist @xmath0s less than the above limit in in which the adiabatic error can vanish ( hence instantaneous full adiabaticity ) . according to eq . ( [ c - g - t ] ) , we have @xmath479 where @xmath480for @xmath481 . the existence of such @xmath465s is in agreement with ref . figure [ fig.constg ] shows @xmath82 for two different values of @xmath257 . _ as is evident here the adiabatic error does not show any exponential behavior . in fact , neither of the methods we discussed in subsection [ expl ] is applicable . here , we discuss the behavior of the exponential @xmath482}$ ] for the general interpolation we derived in subsection [ path - g ] . our analysis is based on a formal power series expansion of @xmath483 and @xmath484 in terms of @xmath257recall that we are interested in the regime @xmath485 . we further assume that @xmath352 does not depend explicitly on @xmath257 . consider the following formal expansions : @xmath486 in which @xmath487 and @xmath488 are some nonnegative numbers ( to be determined later ) , @xmath489 , and @xmath490 . we notice that the linear and constant - gap interpolations ( subsections lin - sec and [ c - gap ] ) do not admit expansions as in eqs . ( [ e1 ] ) and ( [ e2 ] ) . equation ( [ gap ] ) hence yields @xmath491similarly , inserting eqs . ( [ e1 ] ) and ( [ e2 ] ) into @xmath363 gives @xmath492on the other hand , eq . ( [ relat ] ) yields @xmath493the symmetry @xmath494 [ eq . ( [ symmetry ] ) ] requires that @xmath495which in turn implies @xmath496 . comparing the terms with the same powers of @xmath257 in eqs . ( [ x21 - 1 ] ) and ( [ x21 - 2 ] ) , we conclude that @xmath497and @xmath498after inserting the above relations back into eq . ( [ delta - r ] ) and using eq . ( [ fg - eq ] ) , we obtain @xmath499now we assume that @xmath500 everywhere , or if there exist points at which @xmath501 vanishes , their contribution to the integral @xmath502 $ ] is not substantial . note that the previous condition is in fact a condition on the norm of the hamiltonian because from eq . ( [ hnorm ] ) @xmath503therefore , provided that for large times the adiabatic error asymptotically behaves as in eq . ( [ residue ] ) or ( [ st - ph ] ) , we obtain @xmath504\bigr|},\]]where @xmath458 is a non - exponential function of @xmath0 ( which may also depend weakly on @xmath257 ) . hence , in the @xmath214 limit for @xmath66 , it is sufficient to have @xmath505\bigr|.\]]this in turn implies the following scaling for the run time : @xmath506\bigr|\bigr ) . \notag \label{generalt } \\ & & \end{aligned}\]]the overall @xmath257-dependence here comes from @xmath507 and @xmath508 ; e.g. , we recover the grover - like @xmath436 scaling if @xmath287 does not depend on @xmath257 . this analysis then highlights in a fairly general way the interplay between @xmath257 , @xmath0 , and @xmath82 in the quantum search algorithm . for most applications it is desirable to make the adiabatic error as small as possible . we have seen that @xmath82 contains exponential terms , suppressed by the polynomially - decaying terms . therefore , it is useful to somehow extend the dominance of the exponential term by reducing the contribution of the polynomial term , e.g. , by prolonging the dominance of the exponential regime or by enforcing higher order polynomial behavior . in the following we shall discuss a control strategy for reducing the adiabatic error by manipulation of the boundary conditions ( see , e.g. , refs . @xcite ) . equation ( [ er - simp ] ) demonstrates explicitly how the adiabatic error depends on the boundary conditions , up to @xmath509 . interestingly , if we choose @xmath510 , the prefactor of the @xmath2 vanishes , whence @xmath511 . in a similar fashion , one can see that by enforcing suitable ( extra ) boundary conditions on the interpolation @xmath512 the prefactor of the @xmath239 or even higher order terms can be made zero . this implies that by manipulating the boundary conditions of the interpolation , one may achieve smaller adiabatic errors . this observation is a manifestation of the following general theorem : if the hamiltonian @xmath65 is sufficiently differentiable , forcing _ all _ time derivatives of the hamiltonian up to some order @xmath361 to vanish at the boundaries,@xmath513is sufficient for @xmath514 sancho , hagedornjoye:02,jrs , lrh . it is interesting to note that the very same condition together with the assumption of the _ analyticity _ of @xmath65 in a small strip around the real axis in the _ complex _ @xmath48-plane give rise to @xmath515 , where @xmath516 [ up to an @xmath517 prefactor ] @xcite . we obtained above are in fact weaker than requiring @xmath518 [ sufficient for @xmath519 . ] this is a remarkable result , in that it guarantees that with sufficient smoothness at two points one can substantially suppress the adiabatic error . this is a fairly low price to pay for higher accuracy . in particular , in experimental realizations , manipulating hamiltonian interpolations only at the beginning and the end ( as opposed to from beginning to end ) , may offer a less demanding control strategy than one seeking to control the dynamics instantaneously along the entire evolution . now we show that in the framework we developed earlier , enforcing the required smoothness properties can be achieved by choosing an appropriate @xmath352 function . we recall that this function was fairly arbitrary ; we required that it be a monotonically increasing differentiable function ( @xmath356 ) satisfying the boundary conditions @xmath357 and @xmath358 . we require further that @xmath520 ( for a given @xmath481 ) have the following property : @xmath521namely , the first @xmath361 derivatives should vanish at the boundaries . this property is sufficient for fulfilling eq . ( [ hdz ] ) because @xmath522 . an example of such @xmath523 is the regularized incomplete beta function , @xmath524 in which @xmath525 , with @xmath526 , and @xmath527 @xcite . to demonstrate explicitly how the conditions ( [ hdz ] ) affect the adiabatic error , we employ the method developed in refs . hagedornjoye:02,lrh for approximating the coefficients in the @xmath240 expansion of @xmath82 . one can construct an approximate ( unnormalized ) ansatz for the solution to the schrdinger equation ( [ eqscalt ] ) in the powers of @xmath2 as follows : @xmath528,\end{aligned}\]]with the error @xmath529here , @xmath530 and @xmath531 are given as follows @xcite : @xmath532it is evident that @xmath533 . provided that all @xmath534 derivatives of @xmath65 vanish at the boundaries , eq . ( [ hdz ] ) , all the terms except @xmath75 and @xmath535 will vanish @xcite ( see also ref . @xcite , where with a condition different than eq . ( [ fs ] ) all the terms except @xmath536 vanish ) . let us define @xmath537since @xmath538 ( for normalized @xmath539 and @xmath540 ) is a distance [ eq . ( [ delta - d ] ) ] , from the triangle inequality @xmath541 we have : @xmath542notice that @xmath543 can also be written as follows : @xmath544^{2}[1+o(1/t)]^{2 } } } \notag \\ & \approx & \sqrt{1-(1 + 2\mathrm{re}[\langle \widehat{\psi } _ { n}(1)|\widehat{r}_{n}(1)\rangle ] ) } \notag \\ & = & o\bigl(\frac{1}{t^{n+2}}\bigr ) , \label{delta1-t-2}\end{aligned}\]]where @xmath545 on the other hand , a straightforward calculation ( supplemented with induction ) shows that @xmath546this bound holds true for any interpolating paths @xmath512 for which @xmath547 . as can be seen , @xmath543 is negligible in comparison to @xmath548 , hence we obtain @xmath549this result is a generalization of eq . ( [ er - simp ] ) . for example , in the case of the constant - gap interpolation ( subsection [ c - gap ] ) , this error reduces to @xmath550 in comparison with eq . ( [ cg-1 ] ) . figure [ fig : errorbeta ] depicts @xmath82 for the constant - norm interpolation [ eqs . ( rcpath1 ) and ( [ rcpath2 ] ) ] . it can be seen that by increasing @xmath361 the exponential regime dominates longer , while the polynomial regime is pushed farther away to the region of large evolution times . however , this improvement comes at a price . the rate of exponentiality decreases with increasing @xmath361 ; that is , if @xmath551 and @xmath66 for an @xmath83 in the exponential regime for the larger @xmath361 , then @xmath552 [ see the inset of fig . [ fig : errorbeta ] ] . in other words , for some values of @xmath83 , increasing @xmath361 might give rise to an increased run time . of course , if @xmath83 is such that the polynomial regimes dominate for both values of @xmath553 and @xmath554 , the interpolation with the larger @xmath361 ( @xmath554 ) results in a smaller run time . obtained by numerically solving the schrdinger equation corresponding to the constant - norm interpolation with @xmath555 the regularized beta function [ eq . ( [ beta ] ) ] , for @xmath556 ( here @xmath557 ) . the dashed ( red ) lines represent @xmath558 and @xmath559 [ eq . ( [ er])].,width=321 ] nevertheless , @xmath561 helps remove the polynomial terms arbitrarily , hence extending the exponential regime farther . additionally , the exponent of the exponential term is controllable through varying the parameters @xmath86 and @xmath568 . in this case , asymptotic evaluation of the integral ( [ inttran ] ) with the stationary phase method results in a faster - than - polynomial convergence to zero . for example , with @xmath569 and @xmath570 for the constant - norm interpolation , we can approach an exponential convergence similarly to the case with @xmath571 . the achievement of an exponentially small @xmath82 for such functions may be understood as an instance of rigorously derived exponentially small errors for a general class of functions called the gevrey class @xcite . it is evident that manipulating the @xmath352 function may also affect the exponent @xmath572 $ ] . this can be observed in fig . [ fig : errorbeta ] ( the inset ) through the change of the slope of the exponential lines in the log plot . a side consequence of using a @xmath573 with the desired boundary conditions ( [ theta - cond ] ) is that increasing @xmath361 may adversely increase the value of @xmath0 for which @xmath262 ( in the exponential regime ) . to quantify how choosing a @xmath523 for the hamiltonian interpolation affects the performance of the algorithm , we propose the following measure : @xmath574namely , the average adiabatic error up to time @xmath0 , for a given @xmath361 . a larger average error may be interpreted as less efficient performance . the above problem with the effect of @xmath361 on exponentiality may be partially alleviated in some cases . recall that in subsection [ path - g ] we found a fairly general interpolation , which resulted in the parametrization @xmath575 [ eq . ( [ relat])]it was later that we added further conditions so as to find @xmath576 and @xmath577 separately . rather than assuming the condition ( [ bc-3 ] ) , let us impose @xmath578for some @xmath579 . we should be mindful of the fact that , from eq . ( [ hnorm - f ] ) , modifying @xmath501 leads to a modification of the norm of the hamiltonian , or equivalently the maximum energy of the system ; this is a cost , which should be taken care of in the correct estimation of @xmath89 [ eq . ( [ runt ] ) ] . additionally , from eq . ( [ gg-0 ] ) it is seen that since we assumed @xmath580(up to the leading order in @xmath257 ) the gap @xmath162 vanishes where @xmath581 ; i.e. , @xmath582 . in this case , the exponent @xmath583 $ ] [ eq . ( [ xx ] ) ] becomes @xmath584 = \nonumber\\ \mathrm{im}\left[\int_0^{{z_0}_+}\csc\bigl(\pi\theta(\tau')\bigr)~\mathrm{d}\tau'\right ] + \frac{\zeta}{2}. \label{mm}\end{aligned}\]]therefore , by appropriately choosing @xmath585subject to the condition @xmath586we can tune the exponent of the exponential term in @xmath82 . this in turn gives us control over the run time in the exponential regime . furthermore , as we argued earlier , replacing @xmath587 causes the polynomial terms of @xmath82 to be @xmath588 . thus , we are now in possession of two control parameters @xmath361 [ more precisely @xmath523 ] and @xmath585 with which we can manipulate how the adiabatic error behaves in either of the exponential and polynomial regimes . this type of control may have applications in experiments in which adiabaticity plays a role . as an example , let @xmath523 be the regularized beta function [ eq . ( [ beta ] ) ] . for @xmath590 and after employing stirling s approximation for the factorial function ( @xmath591 @xcite ) , we obtain @xmath592whereby @xmath593as a result , for example , in order to keep the maximum energy constant , while having the advantages of @xmath594 , we should choose @xmath595 . adiabatic evolution is characterized by a tradeoff between the total time taken and the error in the final state reached , relative to the desired adiabatic state . motivated by a desire to understand and optimize this tradeoff , in this work we performed a detailed analysis of the adiabatic error for the case of an adiabatic quantum search algorithm . rather than using the traditional adiabatic condition , with its associated pitfalls , we chose to calculate the adiabatic error directly by solving the schrdinger equation . this enabled us to derive an exact relation for the adiabatic error . building on this exact result , we employed a formal polynomial series expansion in @xmath2 for calculating the error term by term . this also allowed us to bound the adiabatic error . we showed that the polynomial expansion should be truncated carefully if we aim to obtain a reliable estimate for the run time of the algorithm . we demonstrated that employing a different technique based on complex analysis reveals , in fairly general situations , a regime of exponential time - dependent decay of the adiabatic error , preceding a polynomial regime . the latter has been shown to be a general feature of adiabatic hamiltonians , whereas the existence of an exponential precursor is not always guaranteed . we showed how , in case these two regimes both exist , one can estimate the crossover region i.e . , the time at which a transition between the two regimes takes place . equipped with this , we provided an estimate for the minimum time required for the algorithm to achieve a given accuracy threshold . discerning the exponential regime enabled us to give an improved total time estimate , circumventing the overestimate arising from the error bound using only the polynomial expansion . indeed , the total time estimated from the exponential regime always gave the correct scaling with system size ( the well - known quadratic speedup over classical search ) , while the estimate resulting from the polynomial regime resulted in unreliable and even erroneous results . we also obtained a specific class of hamiltonian interpolations for the search problem . to this end , we employed a recently developed theory , based on the geometry of adiabatic evolutions , for obtaining suitable adiabatic interpolations . this theory separates the adiabatic error into geometric and non - geometric parts , and minimizes the former . we discussed three special cases of the resulting class of interpolations in detail : ( i ) linear , ( ii ) constant - norm , and ( iii ) constant - gap interpolations . finding strategies for minimizing the required total time as a function of a given resource ( system size , for example ) is a desirable goal for many applications , and is also of fundamental importance for the control of quantum systems . we demonstrated explicitly how by imposing fairly general controllability assumptions , which should be experimentally straightforward to realize in certain scenarios , one can achieve a significant reduction of the adiabatic error , and hence improve algorithmic performance . the method we used relied on a polynomial expansion of the adiabatic error , and resulted in the suppression of polynomial terms in @xmath2 by requiring smoothness for interpolations at the initial and final times . it is evident that controlling the interpolation in this manner , at only two points , has a substantial advantage over instantaneous control of the hamiltonian along the entire evolution . however , we demonstrated that there is an extra price to pay for this error reduction : the exponential regime ( if exists ) is extended , but with a slower rate of decay . this , in turn , may result in an overestimation of the run time of the algorithm for some values of the error threshold . we proposed a measure for quantifying the performance of an adiabatic interpolation with various controllability properties . in some cases , we also suggested a remedy for the above problem . this fix necessitated further control over the hamiltonian interpolation , directly related to the amount of accessible energy in the system . the interplay between the degree of required control over hamiltonian interpolations and the run time needed for achieving a given accuracy was thus clearly exhibited . although we focused on the quantum search problem , our methods and most of our results are applicable ( perhaps with minor modifications ) to a wider class of problems as discussed in the text . since a principal goal in adiabatic quantum algorithms , adiabatic quantum transport , quantum annealing , and other applications of the adiabatic theorem , is the design of algorithms with favorable performance - resource tradeoff , we hope that our results will be of use in related physical applications . Abstract:
[ "adiabatic quantum algorithms are characterized by their run time and accuracy . the relation between the two is essential for quantifying adiabatic algorithmic performance , yet is often poorly understood . we study the dynamics of a continuous time , adiabatic quantum search algorithm , and find rigorous results relating the accuracy and the run time . proceeding with estimates , we show that under fairly general circumstances the adiabatic algorithmic error exhibits a behavior with two discernible regimes : the error decreases exponentially for short times , then decreases polynomially for longer times . we show that the well known quadratic speedup over classical search is associated only with the exponential error regime . we illustrate the results through examples of evolution paths derived by minimization of the adiabatic error . we also discuss specific strategies for controlling the adiabatic error and run time ." ]
13,301
13,301
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the general goal of quantum information processing is to manipulate the information coded in a particular quantum system , while simultaneously trying to isolate it from undesired perturbations due to the external environment . for instance , in the fields of quantum computation @xcite and quantum simulation @xcite , the processing stage usually relies on a designed unitary evolution which , preserving the coherence of the system , provides a quantum state that contains the outcome of the computation , or the properties of the quantum phase of matter under study . therefore , the experimental progress in these fields has been typically associated to technological developments that minimize experimental imperfections and maximize environmental isolation @xcite . however , the coupling of a system to its surrounding environment is not necessarily a disadvantage . in fact , the dissipation of a quantum system , if judiciously exploited , can act as a resource for quantum information processing . this interesting change of paradigm started with the recognition that dissipation can assist the generation of entanglement between distant atoms , either in free space @xcite , or trapped inside cavities @xcite . by measuring the presence of a photon spontaneously emitted by the atoms @xcite , or its absence @xcite , it is possible to project an initially uncorrelated atomic state into a maximally entangled one , as has been recently experimentally demonstrated @xcite . these schemes can be improved further by tailoring the atom - cavity interaction @xcite or by modifying the measurement techniques @xcite , and can also be generalized to provide a route towards universal quantum computation @xcite . since the dissipation does not always render the desired result in these approaches , the measurement is required to select only the successful outcomes . therefore , the combination of dissipation and measurement can be considered as a probabilistic resource for quantum information . another promising approach is to assess whether , by designing the system - environment coupling in a particular way , the dissipation could provide the desired quantum state with certainty . this _ quantum reservoir engineering _ finds its roots in the theory of laser cooling of atoms @xcite and , more related to this work , of trapped ions @xcite . laser - cooling schemes try to design the system - environment coupling such that the dissipation yields a stationary state with reduced kinetic energy . these ideas can be taken a step further in order to non - probabilistically produce stationary states that display non - classical aspects , or a certain amount of entanglement @xcite . for instance , by mimicking superradiance phenomena @xcite , certain engineered decay channels yield partial entanglement in the stationary mixed state @xcite . however , it would be highly desirable to devise dissipative protocols that provide _ maximally - entangled pure states _ asymptotically , the so - called dark states , showing fidelities comparable to those obtained by more standard unitary schemes @xcite . this approach has been recently pursued by different groups which have shown that , provided that one can engineer a dissipation that acts quasi - locally on different parts of the system , it is possible to design dissipative protocols to produce a number of paradigmatic dark states @xcite , or to perform universal dissipative quantum computation @xcite . for instance , by engineering a particular dissipation that acts on pairs of adjacent atoms in an optical lattice , the system can be driven dissipatively into a superfluid phase @xcite . in addition , as initially proposed for rydberg atoms @xcite and first realized in experiments of trapped ions @xcite , by concatenating multi - qubit gates with a controlled dissipation of ancillary qubits , a variety of multipartite entangled states ( i.e. bell , greenberger - horne - zeilinger , and dicke states ) have been dissipatively generated with reasonably high fidelities . let us note that this stroboscopic time - evolution corresponds to a markovian master equation in the limit of many gates and dissipation steps , where the dissipative jump operators correspond to multi - qubit jump operators . from a fundamental point of view , it is of interest to address whether similar dissipative protocols can also work in an _ ( i ) analog _ and _ ( ii ) global _ fashion ( i.e. using always - on couplings without individual addressing ) . additionally , from a more pragmatic point of view , such global analog schemes would not be limited by the accumulation of the errors in each step of the stroboscopic protocols . however , finding particular schemes to provide multi - qubit jump operators in an analog manner seems to be a tremendous task from both a theoretical and experimental point of view . therefore , we impose a further constraint , the jump operators should be composed of _ ( iii ) single - qubit operators_. in this article , we develop an instance of a global analog dissipative protocol that generates multipartite entangled states corresponding to ground states of a quantum spin chain . the underlying idea is to engineer jump operators that are a particular sum of single - spin operators , in analogy to the models of collective spontaneous emission @xcite . we show that , if the dissipation of the spins is mediated by a common harmonic mode , the spin chain sees a structured markovian environment . by structured environment we refer to a spectral density exhibiting a sharp peak at a certain frequency ( so called breit - wigner resonance ) , corresponding to a weakly damped harmonic oscillator . this structure will allow us to design jump operators in such a way that the stationary state of the system corresponds to the ground state of the quantum spin chain . in particular , we consider an isotropic xy spin chain , which describes a critical phase of matter . we explain in detail how to implement this protocol with trapped ions , relying on tools that have already been achieved experimentally . these tools are the so - called state - dependent forces @xcite , and sympathetic resolved - sideband cooling developed for quantum computation @xcite . we test the scheme for realistic parameters , and show that the fidelities that can be achieved are comparable to the unitary protocols that produce multipartite entangled states @xcite . our procedure performs well for small chains of trapped ions , which is actually the regime in most of the current experiments . this article is organized as follows . in sec . [ dissipative_protocol ] , we describe the dissipative protocol . we start by introducing the model under consideration in sec . [ model ] , and then move onto an analytic discussion , supported by numerical results , of how to engineer a structured environment that allows us to prepare multipartite entangled states dissipatively ( sec . [ cooling_spin_wave ] ) . in sec . [ spin_gs_cooling ] we explain how the method can be used to cool the system to the many - body ground state of the quantum spin chain . in sec . [ sec : ions ] we show how crystals of trapped atomic ions are ideally suited for an experimental implementation of our ideas . section [ ion_crystal ] describes the trapped - ion setup , a two - species coulomb crystal . in secs . [ ion_xy_model ] , [ ion_spin_boson ] and [ ion_damping ] we introduce the trapped - ion toolbox required to implement the dissipative protocol . section [ numerical ] contains a numerical analysis of the trapped - ion dissipative protocol . finally , we present our conclusions and an outlook in sec . [ conclusions ] . and @xmath0 going respectively up and down the spectrum of spin - chain excitations with quasi - momentum @xmath1 and energy @xmath2 ( the model parameters are defined in the text ) . ] let us start by introducing the model under consideration : an interacting spin-@xmath3 chain coupled to a damped bosonic mode ( see fig . [ fig_scheme]*(a ) * ) . this model , which shall be referred to as the _ damped spin - boson chain _ ( dsbc ) in the rest of the manuscript , is a many - body generalization of a system considered recently for the dissipative generation of two - qubit entanglement @xcite . the dsbc is described by the following master equation ( @xmath4 ) @xmath5+\mathcal{d}_{\rm b}(\rho),\ ] ] where @xmath6 is the total density matrix , and @xmath7 is the dissipative liouvillian . we consider a finite chain of @xmath8 spins evolving under the isotropic xy hamiltonian @xcite @xmath9 where @xmath10 is an antiferromagnetic interaction strength , and we introduced the raising and lowering operators @xmath11 . the bosonic hamiltonian consists of a single mode @xmath12 where @xmath13 and @xmath14 are respectively the creation and annihilation operators ( the oscillator frequency @xmath15 can actually correspond to a detuning @xmath16 , as will become clear from the experimental implementation ) . the spins and the boson are coupled through @xmath17 in the above expression , we have introduced the site - dependent coupling strength @xmath18 , and the pauli matrices @xmath19 . finally , we also consider weak damping of the bosonic mode via a lindblad - type dissipator @xmath20 where @xmath21 is the damping rate . we note that all these individual ingredients can be realized with the state - of - the - art technology of trapped - ion crystals , as described in sec . [ sec : ions ] . the objective of this work is to understand the interplay of these dynamics , such that the liouvillian @xmath7 generates stationary entanglement between the initially uncorrelated spins . so far , we can already appreciate two of the properties of the protocol outlined in the introduction : _ ( i ) _ it is _ analog _ , since the couplings - are considered to be switched on during the whole protocol . _ ( ii ) _ it is _ global _ , since the couplings - address all the spins of the chain . let us note that the spin - chain hamiltonian alone could already generate entangled states unitarily at given instants of time . nonetheless , these correlations have a transient nature , whereas the interest of this work is the onset of stationary correlations . therefore , we explore the interplay of this hamiltonian part with the irreversible dynamics introduced by the damped boson through the spin - boson coupling . in fig . [ fig_scheme]*(a ) * , we represent schematically the dsbc . the spin chain is considered to be our system @xmath22 , whereas the bosonic mode , together with the markovian reservoir where it dissipates , provide an effective structured environment @xmath23 for the spin chain . at first sight , the dephasing - like spin - boson coupling seems to introduce a source of decoherence in the spin chain , thus hindering rather than assisting the generation of stationary entanglement . in the following section , we will show that this nave intuition is not always valid , and explain the subtle mechanism that allows for generation of stationary entanglement in a particular regime of the system parameters . we consider an initial state of the system @xmath24 , where @xmath25 is an arbitrary state of the harmonic mode , and the uncorrelated spin state @xmath26 has a single spin excitation at the left edge of the chain . in this section , we discuss how the system liouvillian @xmath7 acts on this state , allowing for the onset of stationary entanglement . as a consequence of the xy hamiltonian , the initially localized spin excitation is exchanged between different neighbors . in fact , the spin chain corresponds exactly to a tight - binding model where the excitation hops along the sites of the underlying chain according to @xmath27 in this expression , @xmath28 results from the projection of the xy hamiltonian onto the single - excitation subspace @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the projector onto an @xmath8-dimensional subspace spanned by the states @xmath31 , such that @xmath32 labels the position of the spin excitation in the chain . this tight - binding model gives rise to the following band structure ( see fig . [ fig_scheme]*(b ) * ) @xmath33 where each energy is associated to a `` spin - wave excitation '' @xmath34 the goal of this section is to find the conditions to generate dissipatively one of these multipartite entangled states , @xmath35 . we consider a spatial modulation of the spin - boson coupling strength in the form @xmath36 , where @xmath37 . in the single - excitation subspace , the spin - boson coupling becomes @xmath38 where the ladder operators @xmath39 are responsible for ascending or descending along the ladder of spin - wave excitations ( see fig . [ fig_scheme]*(b ) * ) . accordingly , the spin - boson coupling connects different spin - wave excitations , while simultaneously creating or annihilating bosonic quanta . moreover , since the harmonic mode dissipates irreversibly into a markovian environment , the ladder operators @xmath40 introduce irreversible dynamics in the spin chain . in terms of these ladder operators , the single - excitation spin - chain hamiltonian reads @xmath41 where for simplicity we reset the zero of energy at the bottom of the band . we show below how to generate mesoscopic entangled states by controlling the relative strengths of the dissipative processes that take the system up and down the _ spin - wave ladder_. since we are interested in the stationary properties of the dsbc , we consider long times @xmath42 , such that the bosonic mode has enough time to relax under the action of the damping . besides , for @xmath43 , this relaxation is much faster than the process of energy exchange between the boson and the spins . in this limit , the boson thermalizes individually , and the spin chain evolves on a much slower timescale under such a bosonic background . to obtain the effect of the boson background on the slower spin dynamics @xcite , we must `` integrate out '' the bosonic degrees of freedom from the spin - boson coupling . we start with a state of the form @xmath44 , where @xmath45 is the vacuum of the harmonic mode , and fulfills @xmath46 . we then expand the state at a later time @xmath47 , with @xmath48 , in powers of the coupling constant @xmath49 between the spin system and the oscillator , keeping up to second order in @xmath49 . tracing over the mode , we obtain : @xmath50 where the `` hat '' indicates that we work in interaction picture with respect to @xmath51 , and where we have introduced @xmath52 $ ] . using the explicit form of @xmath53 and @xmath54 , after some algebra and one integral in @xmath55 we find : @xmath56.\end{gathered}\ ] ] here , we introduced the _ collective jump operators _ @xmath57 with @xmath58 $ ] , being @xmath59 the energy difference between two neighboring spin - wave excitations in the spin - wave ladder ( see fig . [ fig_scheme]*(b ) * ) . the integrand in eq . ( [ first_integral ] ) contains some terms that oscillate rapidly in time . we now perform the remaining integral , assuming that the time interval @xmath60 is short compared to the time scale given by @xmath61 , but long enough such that @xmath62 . this condition restricts the values of @xmath49 for which this treatment is valid . to perform the integral , we group the frequencies @xmath63 in such a way that within each group the frequencies are equal , and the difference between the frequencies in different groups is finite ( we note that this is not possible in the limit of infinite sizes , where the energies become a continuum ) . it is worth noticing that the presence of degenerate frequencies is typical in this model and makes the grouping necessary . if one keeps only the dominant terms , which are the terms in the integrand that are constant in time , back in schrdinger picture one finds the following master equation governing the coarse - grained evolution over the time scales of interest : @xmath64+\mathcal{d}_{\rm s } ( \rho_{\rm s}),\ ] ] with @xmath65\,,\end{gathered}\ ] ] and where @xmath66\,.\end{gathered}\ ] ] in the expressions above , the sum over @xmath67 runs over the different transition frequencies in the system , @xmath68 denotes an anticommutator , and the lindblad operators are defined as : [ jump_operator ] j_^+ = _ n/_n= l_n^+ = j_^-^where the sum is over all the values of @xmath69 such that @xmath70 . the action of the different lindblad operators is weighted by the spectral density of the effective environment , @xmath71}.\ ] ] according to these expressions , the spins are subjected to a lorentzian reservoir centered at the boson detuning @xmath15 with a width given by the boson damping rate @xmath72 . therefore , the dissipation on the spins is not equal at all frequencies , but stronger at frequencies matching that of the bosonic mode ( i.e. they do not see a totally flat environment , but a structured one @xcite ) . as announced previously , the ladder operators @xmath40 are responsible for introducing the irreversible dynamics in the spin chain . in particular , they determine the collective jump operators , where the adjective collective emphasizes that they act over all the spins in the chain . however , we remark that these jump operators are a sum of single - spin operators , as opposed to the multi - spin nature of some other engineered dissipation protocols considered recently @xcite . with this discussion , we show the third property of the protocol outlined in the introduction : jump operators are composed of sums of _ ( iii ) single - qubit operators_. this draws an analogy to the models of collective spontaneous emission @xcite , but we will show that the special dissipation mediated by the boson mode allows us to use them to prepare dissipatively the ground state of the spin chain . , the jump operators that descend the ladder govern the dissipative dynamics ( i.e. @xmath73 ) . this can be understood in terms of the effective lorentzian spectral density @xmath74 of the environment seen by the spin chain , which overlaps minimally with the processes that climb up the ladder . * ( b , d ) * in the regime of negative oscillator detuning @xmath75 , the jump operators that climb up the ladder dominate the dissipative dynamics ( i.e. @xmath76 ) , since in this case the spectral density of the environment seen by the spin chain overlaps minimally with the processes that descend the ladder . ] we are searching for the steady state @xmath77 of eq . , @xmath78 , with three properties : being pure , displaying multipartite entanglement , and being unique . a pure steady state @xmath79 necessarily belongs to a hamiltonian eigenspace @xcite , which in our case is given by the spin - wave excitations @xmath80 . additionally , the steady state should also belong to the kernel of the dissipator , @xmath81 . by inspection of the jump operators , we identify two regimes where this can happen , which depend on the boson detuning with respect to the spin - wave energy difference : @xmath82 @xmath83 for the regime of positive detunings , we can then approximate the evolution using that @xmath84 is negligibly small for all @xmath69 , while all the @xmath85 are non - negligible . in that case the non - unitary part of the evolution is _ s _ s 2_j_a ( ) ( j_^- _ s j_^+ - \ { j_^+ j_^- , _ s } ) , taking the system to the lowest state in the manifold of spin waves ( the hamiltonian part does not induce transitions between spin waves ) . thus , the unique pure steady state corresponds to the lowest spin wave @xmath86 . conversely , for negative detunings , the steady state corresponds to the highest spin - wave @xmath87 . following @xcite , it can be shown that in these limits the particular form of the lindblad operators does not allow for mixed steady states . we thus get the desired result : a unique pure state displaying stationary multipartite entanglement . in fig . [ fig_2 ] , we represent schematically the two regimes of interest . when conditions are fulfilled , for @xmath88 , the dissipative processes that go down the spin - wave ladder dominate since @xmath89 . effectively , the dissipation induced by the damped bosonic mode `` cools '' the spin state to the lowest - energy spin wave , @xmath90 ( see fig . [ fig_2]*(a ) * ) . the bath spectral density peaks at the frequencies corresponding to the dissipative processes descending the spin - wave ladder ( see fig . [ fig_2]*(c ) * ) and therefore , the bath absorbs very efficiently the energy dissipated by the spin chain during its relaxation to the spin wave @xmath91 . conversely , when the system parameters fulfill conditions , for negative detunings @xmath92 , it is the dissipative processes that climb up the ladder which dominate , @xmath93 . in this limit , the bosonic mode drives the spin state to the highest - energy spin wave , @xmath94 ( see fig . [ fig_2]*(b ) * ) . the bath spectral density is maximal for the ascending dissipative processes ( see fig . [ fig_2]*(d ) * ) , and the bath provides the required energy to climb up the spin - wave ladder . we may thus conclude that in both regimes , the structured reservoir singles out a unique spin wave as the steady state of the chain , assisting the generation of stationary multipartite entanglement . in the light of these results , we can also understand the regime @xmath95 . in this limit , the reservoir spectral density becomes essentially flat , and both up / down processes contribute equally @xmath96 . it is straightforward to see that if @xmath97 is constant , the dissipator in eq . ( [ complete_dissipator ] ) satisfies @xmath98 , and the totally mixed state @xmath99 becomes a steady state . this regime corresponds to the nave argument of section [ model ] , following which one expects that the dephasing - like term can only decohere the spin chain . it is now clear that there are other regimes , - , where we can profit from a structured environment to assist the generation of stationary entanglement . we now comment on the time required to reach the aforementioned steady states . in the regime where the effective liouvillian was derived , it is given by @xmath100 , where @xmath101 . for a particular experimental setup , where the spin couplings can not reach arbitrarily large values , this preparation time may turn out to be too long for practical purposes . we emphasize , however , that the same dissipative preparation of entangled states can be obtained in a non - markovian regime where @xmath102 , or @xmath103 . since simple master equations can not be derived analytically for this regime , we shall explore it numerically . let us note that although the spin - wave excitations are genuinely multipartite entangled , the weights for the excitation of each of the spins in the system are different . a small modification of the scheme also allows for the dissipative generation of @xmath8-partite w - like states , where the w - state is defined as |w=(|+| + | ) . let us leave for a moment the constraint to consider purely @xmath104 couplings , and assume that it is possible to add external transverse fields that act locally at the two edges of the chain @xmath105 in the subspace with one spin excitation , the ground state of this hamiltonian is of the form |_n = _ i=1^n ( -1)^i |i , which is locally equivalent to the above @xmath8-partite w - state ( we note that the actual w - state can be obtained if the spin - spin coupling is ferromagnetic instead of antiferromagnetic ) . as opposed to the ground state of the spin system considered so far , the w - state has the property that it is fully symmetric under particle interchanges . in the state @xmath106 , the excitation is equally distributed over all the sites , and each of the particles is equally entangled with the rest this state can be prepared with the same method described before , at the price of introducing individual addressability in the trapped - ion proposal of sec . [ sec : ions ] . * approach to the asymptotic state : * time evolution of the error @xmath107 , where @xmath108 is the fidelity with the inhomogeneous spin - wave excitation @xmath109 for a chain of three spins . the curves correspond to the resonant case @xmath110 , while the other parameters are @xmath111 , @xmath112 ( red ) , @xmath113 , @xmath114 ( blue ) , and @xmath115 ( green ) . for these numerical calculations , the oscillator was truncated to three levels , with trace preserved to order @xmath116 . ] + in this section , we analyze numerically the validity of our previous analytical derivations by integrating directly the master equation of the damped spin - boson chain . we obtain the fidelity with the desired stationary entangled state @xmath117 where @xmath26 , we consider that the boson mode is initially in the vacuum state @xmath118 , and @xmath119 is the particular entangled state that the protocol targets . we test the robustness of this fidelity against a non - optimal choice of the system parameters - , a limited protocol time @xmath120 , and an increasing particle number @xmath8 . in figure [ fig : fidelity_dynamics ] , we consider the time evolution of the fidelity for the preparation of the lowest - energy spin - wave excitation of an @xmath121 spin chain @xmath122 for these calculations , we set the oscillator detuning @xmath15 to the value @xmath123 which is resonant with the spin - wave transitions , and vary the ratio between the spin - boson coupling strength @xmath49 and the damping rate @xmath72 . the plot indicates that , for similar values of the final fidelity , the convergence is much faster when @xmath49 and @xmath72 are of the same order . this implies that for practical purposes it is most convenient to work in the deeply non - markovian regime . the optimal ratio @xmath124 , however , depends in general on the number of spins and the value of @xmath15 . it is important to note that the resonance condition can be relaxed to some extent . in figure [ fig : fidelity_n3 ] we analyze the fidelity as a function of the detuning @xmath15 and of the coupling @xmath49 , setting @xmath125 . from our previous analysis , we expect the fidelity to be maximal when @xmath126 , and when @xmath127 approach zero to fulfill the requirement @xmath128 . this behavior is totally captured by the numerical results in fig . [ fig : fidelity_n3]*(a ) * , displaying the asymptotic fidelity . the maximum fidelity , highlighted with a white dot , is indeed found in this limit and is equal to 1 within the numerical errors . we remark that , even when the above conditions are only partially fulfilled , the dynamics can provide the desired state with fidelities well above @xmath129 . therefore , we can claim that our dissipative protocol is considerably robust against parameter imperfections . nevertheless , the time required to approach the desired target state might be prohibitively long . therefore , we also characterize the fidelity for a fixed protocol duration . in fig . [ fig : fidelity_n3]*(b ) * , we show the value of the fidelity at a finite fixed time @xmath130 . as can be seen in this figure , the optimal choice for the oscillator detuning is still @xmath123 , while the optimal value for @xmath131 has moved away from zero . in fact , the best choice now results from the interplay between the condition @xmath132 , and the required convergence speed . we emphasize that it is still possible to find parameters such that the achieved fidelities remain very high , @xmath133 . we now address the dissipative generation of w - like states by adding boundary transverse fields . for the @xmath121 spin chain under consideration , the target state is @xmath134 in fig . [ fig : fidelity_n3]*(c)-(d ) * , we show the asymptotic and finite - time fidelities for the dissipative generation of such a tripartite entangled state with homogeneously - distributed excitations . we observe high fidelities comparable to the inhomogeneous spin - wave state , and moreover , an analogous robustness with respect to a non - optimal choice of the system parameters . let us note that , for @xmath121 , there are two different transitions in the spectrum of these w - type spin - waves : one is resonant at a frequency of @xmath135 , and the remaining one occurs at @xmath136 . therefore , it is impossible to set an oscillator detuning at resonance with both transitions simultaneously , and thus the conditions are not completely fulfilled . this explains the fact that the w - type fidelities achieved for finite times are lower than those corresponding to the inhomogeneous spin waves in fig . [ fig : fidelity_n3]*(b ) * , where the two transitions have the same frequency @xmath137 . in this section , we have analyzed numerically the validity of the scheme for the generation of the simplest case of multipartite entanglement , namely tripartite entangled states . a question that should be carefully addressed is whether the same scheme can be used to generate @xmath8-partite entangled states , and how large can the attained fidelities be as @xmath8 is increased . this is the topic of the following section . we start by assessing the fulfillment of the necessary conditions - , which rely on the energetic difference between the dissipative processes that climb up / down the spin - wave ladder , as the number of spins @xmath8 is increased . for very large spin chains @xmath138 , the energy differences between neighboring spin waves @xmath139 . this implies that the energetic argument selecting only processes going up or down the ladder can no longer hold . indeed , @xmath140 , so that the protocol ceases to be operative in the thermodynamic limit of infinitely long chains . however , for mesoscopic spin chains , the ratio @xmath141 can be controlled to an acceptable degree . in fig . [ fig : nsites]*(a ) * , we show that for positive detunings and @xmath142 , @xmath143 for the most of the spin - wave excitations , whereas slightly higher values are attained for the extremal spin excitations ( where @xmath144 ) . for ratios @xmath141 on this order , we expect that the dissipative preparation of entangled states still works with acceptable fidelities . to be more specific , we note that the presence of different transition frequencies @xmath63 is generic for @xmath145 , which represents an obstacle for the efficiency of the procedure . as the number of spins is increased , the convergence also becomes slower because of the larger number of steps down / up the ladder towards the target state , and the lower transition frequencies which require a decrease in @xmath49 and @xmath72 . in fig . [ fig : nsites]*(b ) * , we show numerical results for the dependence of the protocol error @xmath146 achieved for a finite time @xmath147 as a function of the number of sites and optimizing the values of @xmath49 , @xmath72 and @xmath15 . we observe that the errors obtained for the dissipative state preparation of the inhomogeneous spin wave @xmath148 are below 10% for chains of up to ten sites . in comparison , the creation of the w - like states is worse , and such high fidelities can only be achieved for short chains of up to five sites . * the dissipative protocol in mesoscopic chains : * * ( a ) * ratio @xmath149 of the relative strength of the dissipative processes climbing up and going down the ladder as a function of quasimomentum index @xmath69 for different number of spins @xmath8 . the values @xmath150 correspond to negative oscillator detunings @xmath151 which select the processes up the ladder , whereas @xmath152 corresponds to positive oscillator detunings @xmath153 selecting the cooling processes down the ladder . * ( b ) * error @xmath154 for the dissipative generation of the target state in a finite time @xmath147 as a function of the number of spins @xmath8 in the chain . the blue circles represent the errors corresponding to the inhomogeneous spin waves @xmath155 . the red diamonds represent the error for the w - like states @xmath156 . for the numerical calculation , the hilbert space of the oscillator was truncated to four levels . ] so far , our analysis has been restricted to an @xmath8-dimensional subspace of the spin chain , since the initial spin state @xmath26 contains a single excitation , and the number of spin excitations is preserved by the complete dsbc liouvillian . in the following we explore the full @xmath157-dimensional hilbert space of the spin chain . in order to treat the full hilbert space of the spins , we fermionize the spin chain via the so - called jordan - wigner transformation @xcite , namely @xmath158 where @xmath159 are fermionic creation - annihilation operators . the spin - chain and spin - boson hamiltonians can be expressed in terms of the jordan - wigner fermions as follows @xmath160 where we recall that the spin - boson couplings are @xmath36 with @xmath37 . the next step is to express these hamiltonian terms in the spin - wave basis introduced in eq . , which leads to the following expressions @xmath161 where the fermionic operators in momentum space are @xmath162 . in combination with the dissipative part given by eq . , the spin - boson system is analogous to a _ damped single - mode holstein model _ , a dissipative version of the familiar holstein model describing electron - phonon interactions @xcite . we can obtain the same formal expressions as in the single - excitation problem by rewriting the ladder operators in second - quantized form @xmath163 accordingly , in the regime where the boson degrees of freedom can be integrated out , we obtain a purely fermionic master equation which coincides with eqs . - , but with the collective jump operators now expressed in terms of the jordan - wigner ladder operators @xmath164 as a result , the dissipative dynamics restricted to the single - excitation sector can be generalized directly to the full hilbert space with arbitrary numbers of spin excitations . let us now consider an initial state with an arbitrary number of spin excitations @xmath165 distributed along the chain @xmath166 we would like to determine the steady - state of the spin - boson system if the conditions are fulfilled . in this limit , the lindblad operators are only of the form @xmath167 such a jump operator has the effect of lowering the energy of the fermionic quasiparticles . due to the pauli exclusion principle , the initial @xmath168 excitations can not all occupy the lowest energy level , with quasimomentum @xmath169 . instead , the stationary state must be of the following form @xmath170 this is precisely the ground state of the original isotropic xy model , if supplemented with a homogeneous transverse field @xmath171 . in this hamiltonian , the transverse field plays the role of an effective chemical potential @xmath172 , which is determined by the initial number of spin excitations . due to the to the dissipative process , the excitations are distributed in the lowest available single - particle states ( see fig . [ fig_6]*(a ) * ) . this means , for each number of spins up in the initial state prepared , there is a value of the transverse field @xmath173 such that the asymptotic state corresponds to the ground state of @xmath174 . conversely , a given choice of @xmath175 determines the number of spins that should be up in the initial state so that the dissipative dynamics take the system into the desired ground state . spin excitations to the lowest non - occupied state . the stationary state corresponds to the ground state of the isotropic xy hamiltonian , with the particular filling determined by an additional transverse field acting as a chemical potential . * ( b ) * the same as in * ( a ) * but selecting the processes that climb up the ladder . the stationary state would correspond to the zero - temperature state of the same xy model in a transverse field , but with reversed coupling strengths . ] we could also explore the steady state when the conditions are fulfilled . in this limit , the only lindblad operators are of the form : @xmath176 and pump all the excitations to the highest - energy available single - particle states @xmath177 corresponding to the ground - state of the xy hamiltonian @xmath178 with a ferromagnetic spin - spin coupling , and an inverted chemical potential ( see fig . [ fig_6]*(b ) * ) . * scaling of the ground - state - cooling protocol : * error @xmath179 in producing the desired ground - state @xmath180 after a fixed time @xmath147 and for a number of spins ranging from @xmath181 to @xmath182 . for each number of sites , we plot in blue circles the average over the different possible numbers of excitations ( @xmath183 $ ] ) , and with yellow and red squares the best and worst cases , respectively . for the numerical calculation , the hilbert space of the oscillator was truncated to three levels . ] let us now confirm the validity of the above argument by numerical analysis for small spin chains with different numbers of initial excitations . in fig . [ fig : xx ] , we display the error in producing the ground - state taking a fixed protocol time of @xmath147 . the highest errors occur when the number of excitations is 1 or @xmath184 , since the transition frequencies are lowest at these points ( this is the worst case , with the errors plotted in fig . [ fig : xx ] by means of red squares ) . with yellow squares , we represent the lowest attained errors . note that the average errors of the protocol ( blue circles , averaged over all the possible excitation numbers ) are as low as @xmath185 for chains up to @xmath182 spins , which would thus allow us to prepare dissipatively the ground state of the spin model with fidelities of @xmath186 . let us close this section by noting that , in the general case with an arbitrary number of spin excitations , a different choice for the site - dependence of the coupling coefficients @xmath18 may allow for jump operators that go down / up the spin ladder in larger steps , and therefore favor a faster convergence to the asymptotic state ( this appears to be specially well - suited for chains around the half - filling condition ) . however , for up to @xmath182 spins , we have not found any sizable advantage , and the highest fidelities were always achieved for transitions between neighboring spin waves @xmath187 . let us describe a specific platform where the dsbc model can be realized . we consider a system of @xmath188 ions confined in a linear radio - frequency trap @xcite , and arranged forming a one - dimensional chain ( see fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(a ) * ) . the vibrational degrees of freedom around the equilibrium positions can be expressed in terms of the so - called normal modes @xcite , namely @xmath189 where @xmath190 refers to the trap axis , @xmath191 labels the different modes with frequencies @xmath192 , and @xmath193 are bosonic operators that annihilate / create phonons in a particular mode . in a linear chain of ions with equal mass , the phonon branches have the structure shown in fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(b ) * , such that the different modes spread around the trap frequencies lying in the range @xmath1941 - 10mhz , @xmath1951 - 10mhz , and @xmath1960.1 - 1mhz . a property of the longitudinal branch that will be used in this work is the existence of an energy gap between the lowest - energy mode ( i.e. the center - of - mass mode ) and the following one . as shown in fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(a ) * , @xmath8 ions of the chain correspond to a particular atomic species with hyperfine structure , whereas the remaining @xmath197 ions , that will be used for cooling , do not necessarily have hyperfine splitting ( we note that though we focus on hyperfine qubits , our proposal could be generalized to optical or zeeman qubits ) . for simplicity , in the following we describe the case @xmath198 . for the first @xmath8 ions , we select two hyperfine levels of the ground - state manifold , which are referred to as spin states @xmath199 , and have a transition frequency @xmath200 in the microwave range with a negligible linewidth @xmath201 ( fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(c ) * ) . for the remaining @xmath202-th ion , we select two internal states @xmath203 from a certain transition with frequency @xmath204 , and linewidth @xmath20510 - 100@xmath206khz ( fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(d ) * ) . this is the so - called resolved sideband limit @xmath207 , which will allow for an efficient laser cooling close to the vibrational ground state for the longitudinal center - of - mass mode @xcite . let us note that these small linewidths can be obtained by a variety of methods depending on the particular ion species ( e.g. for weakly - allowed dipole transitions , for quadrupole - allowed transitions with an additional laser that admixes the excited state with that of a dipole - allowed transition , or by a raman configuration ) @xcite . the complete degrees of freedom are thus described by the following master equation @xmath208+\tilde{\mathcal{d}}(\rho),\ ] ] where we have introduced the hamiltonians @xmath209 such that @xmath210 , and @xmath211 ( we use @xmath212 instead of @xmath213 to emphasize the pseudo - spin character of these internal states ) . additionally , we have to take into account the dissipation from the dipole - allowed transition considering recoil effects @xcite . for trapped ions , this can be described by the following super - operator @xmath214 , where @xmath215 where @xmath216 . this is the usual dissipator of a two - level atom in an electromagnetic environment . the spontaneous emission also has effects on the vibrational degrees of freedom due to the photon recoil . to leading order in the lamb - dicke parameter @xmath217 for each normal mode , the jump operators create and annihilate phonons as given by @xcite : @xmath218\tilde{\tau}_{n+1}^++\text{h.c . } , \end{split}\ ] ] where we have introduced @xmath219 , with @xmath220 the coefficients describing the displacement of the @xmath221 ion in mode @xmath69 along direction @xmath222 . once the vibrational and atomic degrees of freedom have been introduced , let us summarize the role that each of them will play in the realization of the damped spin - boson chain : _ ( i ) _ the hyperfine levels of the @xmath8 ions will simulate the spins in the dsbc model . _ ( ii ) _ the @xmath223 vibrational modes along the @xmath224 and @xmath225 axes will be used to mediate the spin - spin interactions leading to the isotropic xy model in eq . . _ ( iii ) _ the longitudinal center - of - mass mode will play the role of the harmonic oscillator in the dsbc model . _ ( iv ) _ the atomic levels of the @xmath202-th ion will be used to laser - cool the longitudinal center - of - mass mode . we note that the position of this auxiliary ion is irrelevant for the purpose of cooling , but it modifies the spin couplings in the chain . moreover , it is also possible to use more than one auxiliary ion as an additional knob to control the damping rate . in the following sections , we will detail the different elements required for the ion - trap implementation of the dsbc . we emphasize that all of them can be realized with state - of - the - art technology . we start by addressing how to implement the isotropic xy model in the ion chain by means of a variation of the mlmer - srensen gate @xcite . the idea is to use the so - called spin - dependent forces , a tool that has already been implemented in several laboratories for different purposes @xcite . by combining a pair of raman laser beams ( see fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(c ) * ) , each of which is tuned to the red / blue first vibrational sideband of the hyperfine transition @xcite , it is possible to obtain the following state - dependent force @xmath226 where the `` hat '' indicates the interaction picture with respect to @xmath227 . in the above expression , we have assumed that the effective wavevector of the raman beams @xmath228 points along the @xmath229 axis of the trap ( see fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(a ) * ) . additionally , we assume that the strength of both raman beams is equal , such that they share a common rabi frequency @xmath230 , and have opposite detunings , such that we can define a common @xmath231 . we have introduced the laser lamb - dicke parameter @xmath232 . the constraints on these parameters are @xmath233 to neglect other terms in addition to such a state - dependent force . finally , we have defined the sum and difference of the raman beam phases @xmath234 and the pauli spin operator @xmath235 . in order to obtain the desired isotropic xy model , we apply two orthogonal state - dependent forces with the following phases and directions @xmath236 altogether , the hamiltonian of the ion chain in the interaction picture becomes @xmath237 performing a magnus expansion @xcite , the evolution turns out to be given by the unitary operator @xmath238 , where @xmath239 displays the following form to second order @xmath240.\ ] ] we want to derive an effective hamiltonian from this expression @xmath241 ( where the superscript `` ti '' stands for the trapped - ions realization ) . the first - order contribution leads to a couple of orthogonal state - dependent displacements , which can only be neglected in the limit @xmath242 @xcite . in addition , from the non - commutativity of the @xmath243 and @xmath244 forces , we get a residual spin - phonon coupling in the second - order term of the magnus expansion . in order to neglect it , we have to impose a further constraint , namely @xmath245 , which can be fulfilled if the trap frequencies along the @xmath246 axes are sufficiently different @xmath247 . under these constraints , an interacting quantum spin chain is obtained @xmath248 therefore , by adjusting the strengths of the raman beams , and their detunings , it is possible to find a regime where @xmath249 , and the above spin hamiltonian corresponds to the desired isotropic xy model since @xmath250 . let us remark that the resulting xy model has the peculiarity of displaying long - range couplings . in fact , when @xmath251 , and the raman lasers are far - detuned from the whole vibrational branch , it can be shown that these couplings decay with a dipolar law . the trapped - ion hamiltonian becomes a realization of the xy interaction in the dsbc model after the identifications @xmath252 , and @xmath253 . for typical nearest - neighbor distances of @xmath2541 - 10@xmath173 m , the spin - spin couplings attain strengths in the @xmath2551 - 10 khz . let us note that modifications of the scheme of state - dependent forces have been proposed to yield other quantum spin models @xcite , some of which have also been realized experimentally @xcite . [ ion_spin_boson ] let us now address how to implement the spin - boson coupling in the ion chain . the idea is again to use a @xmath256-beam configuration ( see fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(c ) * ) , but in a different regime . rather than tuning the two - photon frequencies @xmath257 to the vibrational sidebands of the hyperfine transition , we impose that @xmath258 . moreover , we consider that the laser beams form a standing wave along the trap @xmath259-axis ( see fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(a ) * ) . under these constraints , the laser - ion interaction leads to a crossed - beam differential ac - stark shift , which can be interpreted as another state - dependent force in the @xmath260 basis @xmath261 where the `` hat '' refers to the interaction picture with respect to @xmath262 . here , the parameters are defined in analogy to those in eq . , with three important differences : _ ( i ) _ @xmath263 is not the two - photon rabi frequency of the hyperfine transition , but rather a differential ac - stark shift coming from processes where a photon is exchanged between the pair of laser beams in the @xmath256 configuration . _ ( ii ) _ the detunings are changed to @xmath264 . _ ( iii ) _ since the ion chain lies along the @xmath259 axis , there is an additional site - dependent phase when shining the lasers such that @xmath265 . when adjusting the difference of the laser phases to be @xmath266 , then we obtain @xmath267 . let us highlight that the standing - wave nature of this spin - dependent force is not essential for the dissipative protocol . however , it makes the connection with the dsbc studied in sec . [ dissipative_protocol ] more transparent . we will show in sec . [ numerical ] that essentially the same fidelities can be achieved for a traveling - wave configuration , which has also been experimentally demonstrated @xcite . we now exploit the particular properties of the longitudinal phonon branch ( see fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(b ) * ) . more precisely , we use the presence of a gap between the axial center - of - mass mode and the rest of the modes along the same direction . for the case of equal ions , @xmath268 , while for different ion species or isotopes , the exact value of the gap will depend on the mass ratio and the position of the cooling ions . we assume that @xmath269 is red - detuned with respect to the axial center - of - mass mode @xmath270 , such that @xmath271 . since the next vibrational modes are separated by a large energy gap , the laser coupling to the remaining phonon branch is highly off - resonant and can be thus neglected . accordingly , this state - dependent force gives _ l_z=_i_i1^z_i^zb_1ze^-i_1zt+ h.c .. we can finally move to a different picture where the above hamiltonian becomes time - independent @xmath272 , where [ spin_boson_ion ] h_b^ti&=_i_1zb_1z^b_1z , + h_sb^ti&=_i_i1^z_i^z(b_1z+b_1z^ ) . therefore , it is clear that the center - of - mass mode plays the role of the harmonic oscillator @xmath273 in the dsbc , with the laser detuning corresponding to the oscillator detuning @xmath274 in the dsbc model . in addition , the strength of the state - dependent force determines the spin - boson coupling @xmath275 in the dsbc model . let us now comment on realistic values for the trapped - ion parameters . since the laser detuning should only fulfill @xmath2761 - 10@xmath206mhz , it will be easy to reach the required condition of @xmath2771 - 10@xmath206khz . on the other hand , we know from the previous section that @xmath278 is necessary to have an accurate pumping to the desired entangled state . nevertheless , @xmath49 should not be too small that the total preparation time becomes prohibitively long . a suitable choice could be @xmath279 0.1 - 0.5 khz . since @xmath280 , it will suffice to set the rabi frequency in the @xmath2811 - 5@xmath282khz . finally , we should adjust the laser wavevector such that @xmath283 . once the implementation of the xy model and the spin - boson coupling has been described , let us turn into the last required ingredient : an effective damping of the bosonic mode . as discussed previously , the idea is to exploit the atomic levels of the @xmath284-th ion to laser - cool the longitudinal center - of - mass mode . since the resonance frequencies are very different , @xmath285 , the cooling lasers do not affect the spin dynamics of the other @xmath8 ions . however , since the vibrational modes are collective , it is possible to sympathetically cool the vibrations of the crystal by only acting on the @xmath284-th ion . this sympathetic laser cooling @xcite has been already realized experimentally in small crystals for quantum computation @xcite . our starting point is the master equation with the dissipation superoperators - . to control the effective damping , we introduce a laser beam red detuned from the atomic transition @xmath286 , such that @xmath287 ( see fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(d ) * ) . let us note that the particular laser - beam configuration will depend on the particular ion species , and the scheme to attain the resolved - sideband limit @xcite . we consider that the laser is in a traveling - wave configuration , such that its wavevector is aligned parallel to the trap axis @xmath288 ( see fig . [ fig_ion_scheme]*(a ) * ) . after expanding in series of the lamb - dicke parameter @xmath289 , the laser - ion interaction leads to two different terms , the so - called carrier term @xmath290 and the red and blue sideband terms @xmath291 where we introduced @xmath292 , and the corresponding rabi frequency @xmath293 . by controlling appropriately these sideband terms , and their interplay with the atomic spontaneous emission , it is possible to tailor the damping of the longitudinal modes . let us rearrange the full liouvillian as a sum of two terms @xmath294 , where @xmath295+\tilde{\mathcal{d}}^0(\bullet),\\ \mathcal{l}_1(\bullet)&=-{{\rm i}}[\tilde{h}_{\tilde{\rm l}_z}^1,\bullet]+\tilde{\mathcal{d}}^1(\bullet ) , \end{split}\ ] ] which is justified for small lamb - dicke parameters . to obtain the effective damping of the longitudinal center - of - mass mode , we use a similar formalism as in @xcite . in this case , the fastest timescale in the problem is given by the decay rate @xmath296 of the atomic states of the @xmath202-th ion . therefore , we must `` integrate out '' these atomic degrees of freedom , which can be accomplished by projecting the density matrix of the full system into @xmath297 , where @xmath298 fulfills @xmath299 , and @xmath300 is the reduced density matrix for the @xmath8 spins and the chain vibrational modes . for this we use the expression @xmath301 where the `` hats '' refer to the interaction picture with respect to @xmath262 . after some algebra , one gets the effective damping of the longitudinal modes @xmath302+{\mathcal{d}}_{\rm b}(\rho_{n}),\ ] ] where we have introduced the bosonic dissipator @xmath303 together with the effective rates for laser cooling and heating @xmath304 here , the so - called diffusion coefficient accounting for the recoil heating is @xmath305 , and the spectral functions of the sideband terms are @xmath306 which can be obtained by means of the quantum regression theorem . the formalism and cooling rates coincide with those of a single trapped ion @xcite , with the difference that in the diffusion coefficient @xmath307 and forces @xmath308 one must consider the normal vibrational modes at the position of the cooled ion . the idea is to work in the resolved sideband regime @xmath207 , and set the laser - cooling parameters to optimize the cooling of the longitudinal center - of - mass mode @xmath309 . in this regime , the cooling dominates in , and we are left with the desired damping of the bosonic mode @xmath310 once more , after the identifications @xmath273 , and @xmath311 , we obtain an analogous dsbc damping . let us finally comment on the required cooling rates . ideally , we should achieve the regime @xmath3120.1 - 0.5 khz . since such cooling is not particularly fast , it is possible to find the right detuning @xmath287 such that @xmath3130.1 - 0.5 khz . besides , since we are in the resolved sideband limit , the heating can be made much smaller , @xmath314 . the stationary state of a harmonic oscillator under the action of @xmath315 in eq . is a thermal state with mean number of quanta @xmath316 . in the limit @xmath317 , such that the cooling is the dominant effect and the heating only presents a small correction , the equilibrium state of the center - of - mass mode is close to the vacuum state . in this last section , we will explore numerically how the dissipative protocol described in the part [ dissipative_protocol ] of this manuscript can be implemented with the trapped - ion dscb model in eqs . , and , namely @xmath318+\mathcal{d}_{\rm b}^{\rm ti}(\rho).\ ] ] therefore , the results discussed below correspond to the actual spin - spin couplings @xmath319 in an ion trap , which are not nearest - neighbors couplings , but display a dipolar decay with the cube of the distance . furthermore , we have taken into account that in harmonic ion traps , the interparticle distance is not constant over the chain . more importantly , we have considered the effects of the always - present heating term in the trapped - ion effective damping . * heating in the trapped - ion dissipative protocol : * * ( a ) * fidelity with the desired target state for a fixed time @xmath147 and as a function of the ratio @xmath320 between the sympathetic heating and cooling rates in a chain of six ions in which the central four represent sites of the isotropic xy spin chain . the blue dots correspond to the case of @xmath321 initial spin excitations , and the orange squares to the case of @xmath322 excitations . the oscillator was truncated to five levels . * ( b ) * same as in * ( a ) * , but considering a shorter time @xmath323 , and a traveling - wave configuration of the spin - boson coupling in eq . . the achieved fidelities for this experimentally simpler configuration are similar to the ones in * ( a)*. ] in fig . [ fig:6 ion chain]*(a ) * , we show the optimal fidelity for the dissipative generation of the ideal ground state at different fillings , by integrating numerically the dipolar and inhomogeneous trapped - ion dsbc model as a function of the ratio between heating and cooling rate @xmath324 . we study a chain of @xmath325 ions , in which @xmath326 have a hyperfine structure and play the role of the spins in the xy chain , while the two peripheral ions are assumed to be used for sympathetic cooling ( this choice of auxiliary cooling ions at the ends of the chain makes the interparticle spacing slightly more homogeneous for the `` system '' ions ) . as can be seen in the figure , when @xmath327 , the fidelities with the target ground state approach 100@xmath328 , which allows us to conclude that the differences due to the inhomogeneity of the chain and the dipolar range of interactions with respect to the ideal homogeneous and nearest - neighbor dsbc do not compromise the fidelities severely . the situation is different as finite heating rates @xmath329 are considered . in fig . [ fig:6 ion chain]*(a ) * , we observe that the fidelity with the target ground state decays essentially linear with @xmath324 . in the worst case considered , where @xmath330 leads to a mean phonon number of @xmath331 , the fidelities obtained are reduced to roughly @xmath332 . we note that resolved sideband cooling of single vibrational modes has been experimentally achieved reaching @xmath333 below 0.1 for single trapped ions @xcite . sympathetic cooling of crystals up to @xmath326 ions has also been achieved @xcite , reaching values as low as @xmath334 with pulsed techniques . we note that our scheme does not demand such an accurate ground - state cooling ( see fig . [ fig:6 ion chain]*(a ) * ) , and we expect that the required mean phonon numbers @xmath335 can also be achieved in a continuous cooling scheme . another source of experimental imperfections is given by slow drifts of the trap frequencies which will modify the detuning @xmath336 in different experimental runs , such that the conditions will not be perfectly fulfilled . nonetheless , in fig . [ fig : fidelity_n3 ] we have shown that the dissipative character of the protocol endows it with a natural robustness with respect to non - optimal choices of the parameters . therefore , one can expect large fidelities even in the presence of slow drifts of the trap frequency within the khz - range . in any case , to alleviate imperfections caused by both magnetic - field dephasing and trap frequency drifts , we have considered a faster protocol where the required time is @xmath3371 - 10@xmath206ms . in fig . [ fig:6 ion chain]*(b ) * , we show that the achieved fidelities in this case are still above 0.8 ( for heating / cooling ratios below 0.2 ) . moreover , in this figure we have also considered substituting the standing - wave force in eq . by a traveling - wave configuration , which is experimentally less demanding . the need of the @xmath260 state - dependent force forbids the use of magnetic - field insensitive states ( i.e. clock states ) . therefore , the hyperfine spins will be subject to fluctuations induced by non - shielded external magnetic fields , typically leading to dephasing in a timescale of @xmath3381 - 10@xmath206ms . these timescales are comparable to the protocol times @xmath3391 - 10@xmath206ms , where we have taken @xmath3401 - 10@xmath206khz . nevertheless , these magnetic - field fluctuations act globally for standard radio - frequency traps @xmath341 , where @xmath342 is a fluctuation of the resonance frequency due to the zeeman shift ( note that this might not be the case for micro - fabricated surface traps , where fluctuating magnetic - field gradients can also arise ) . since the dynamics of the dsbc conserves the number of spin excitations , this magnetic - field noise only introduces a global fluctuating phase , and thus does not decohere the state of the system . therefore , as far as the induced spin dynamics occurs within any subspace with a conserved number of excitations , the dissipative protocol is robust to global magnetic - field noise . * anisotropy in the trapped - ion dissipative protocol : * * ( a ) * fidelity with the desired target state for a fixed time @xmath343 and as a function of the anisotropy ratio @xmath344 for a chain of six ions in which the central four ions represent sites of the slightly - anisotropic xy spin chain . the blue dots correspond to the case of @xmath321 initial spin excitations , and the orange squares to the case of @xmath322 excitations . the oscillator was truncated to five levels . ] it is , however , important to stabilize the intensity of the state - dependent forces to the sweet spot where @xmath249 , and make sure that @xmath345 to neglect any term that does not conserve the number of excitations . the effect of off - resonant terms in the scheme leading to the xy interactions , that could give rise to non - conservation of the number of spin excitations , should be much smaller than in stroboscopic proposals @xcite since our protocol does not require fast gates @xcite . in fig . [ fig:7 ion chain ] , we show the achieved fidelities for anisotropies in @xmath346 . the results have been obtained numerically for the same regime as in fig . [ fig:6 ion chain]*(b ) * , and indicate that if @xmath347 differ by 1 part in @xmath348 , the fidelities are not severely reduced . the results in fig . [ fig:7 ion chain ] also show a marked difference in the robustness depending on the number of spin excitations in the initial state . this behaviour , at first surprising , can be understood by looking at the small undesired hamiltonian terms responsible for the anisotropy in an interaction picture with respect to the ideal isotropic hamiltonian . the anisotropy term creates or destroys fermionic quasiparticles in pairs , and rotates with a frequency that is the sum of the energies of the two quasiparticles . for the case with only one spin up , it is possible to create from the ideal target state pairs of fermions with energy adding up to zero , so that these error terms do not rotate . in the case with two spin excitations , on the contrary , the lower half of the fermionic spectrum is filled , so that any hamiltonian term creating or destroying a pair of fermions from the ideal target state oscillates in time , and therefore its effect is strongly suppressed . we have presented a method to dissipatively generate multipartite - entangled states corresponding to the ground states of small spin chains with isotropic xy hamiltonian in a transverse field . the protocol for dissipative state preparation is interesting from a fundamental point of view , as it illustrates how local and even purely markovian noise can assist entanglement production . indeed , the jump operators required are sums of terms acting on individual sites , in contrast with the few - body ( quasi - local ) nature of the operators in @xcite . when the noise deviates from exact markovianity , the required time for achieving the steady state is reduced , which illustrates the value of non - markovian effects for practical purposes . we would like to emphasize that the general idea underlying the procedure presented in this work is not specific to the model considered , and might be generalized to other spin hamiltonians . as an example , we introduced a variation that can be used to generate states locally equivalent to w - states . it would also be interesting to modify our dissipative protocol to prepare the ground state of a gapped spin model . for longer ion chains , the combination of more state - dependent forces with different wavevectors could improve the scalability of the protocol . we have also explained in detail how to implement this method in small chains of trapped ions . in our proposal , two internal levels of the ions embody the spin system and a collective motional mode represents the damped oscillator . the preparation procedure requires the implementation of spin - spin interactions using the so - called mlmer - srensen scheme , the action of a state - dependent force , and sympathetic cooling , all ingredients within the capabilities of present ion - trap technology . numerical simulations including different sources of errors indicate that the protocol can produce the target states with fidelities comparable to the more standard coherent protocols @xcite . the method presented is indeed robust against a number of experimental imperfections , and the implementation is simplified since only global addressing of the ions is required . our results , however , may find a realization in different experimental setups . for instance , the application of our ideas to arrays of superconducting qubits in stripline resonators seems feasible . morever , since this model can also be understood as a quadratic fermonic model with an additional chemical potential fixing the number of particles , the results may also be interesting for fermionic atoms in optical lattices . the realization of this kind of dissipative system paves the way for the implementation of more complex scenarios to study the interplay of coherent and incoherent dynamics giving rise to noise - induced criticality @xcite . indeed , recent work in the area of non - equilibrium quantum phase transitions @xcite has shown a number of fascinating results that could be demonstrated in systems of trapped ions using tools similar to the ones in our protocol . d. e. browne , m. b. plenio , and s. f. huelga , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v91/i6/e067901[phys . * 91 , * 067901 ( 2003 ) ] ; l .- m . duan and h. j. kimble , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v90/i25/e253601[phys . rev . lett . * 90 , * 253601 ( 2003 ) . ] a. beige , d. braun , b. tregenna , and p. l. knight , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v85/i8/p1762_1[phys . * 85 , * 1762 ( 2000 ) ] ; j. pachos and h. walther , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v89/i18/e187903[phys . rev . lett . * 89 , * 187903 ( 2002 ) ] ; a. beige , d. braun , s. bose , s.f . huelga , p.l . knight , m.b . plenio and v. vedral , http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500340008232183[j . mod . opt . * 47 * , 2583- 2598 ( 2000 ) ] . j. f. poyatos , j. i. cirac , and p. zoller , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v77/i23/p4728_1[phys . * 77 , * 4728 ( 1996 ) ] ; m. b. plenio and s. f. huelga , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v88/i19/e197901[phys . rev . lett . * 88 , * 197901 ( 2002 ) ] . a. gonzalez - tudela , d. martin - cano , e. moreno , l. martin - moreno , c. tejedor , and f.j . garcia - vidal , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v106/i2/e020501[phys . * 106 , * 020501 ( 2011 ) ] ; a. bermudez , t. schaetz , and m. b. plenio , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v110/i11/e110502[phys . lett . * 110 * , 110502 ( 2013 ) ] ; m. j. kastoryano , f. reiter , and a. s. srensen , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v106/i9/e090502[phys . rev . * 106 * , 090502 ( 2011 ) ] . j. t. barreiro , m. mller , p. schindler , d. nigg , t. monz , m. chwalla , m. hennrich , c. f. roos , p. zoller , and r. blatt , http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v470/n7335/full/nature09801.html[nature * 470 , * 486 ( 2011 ) ] ; p. schindler , m. mller , d. nigg , j. t. barreiro , e. a. martinez , m. hennrich , t. monz , s. diehl , p. zoller , and r. blatt , http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v9/n6/abs/nphys2630.html[nature phys . * 9 * , 361 ( 2013 ) ] . c. monroe , d.m . meekhof , b.e . king , and d.j . wineland , http://www.sciencemag.org/content/272/5265/1131.abstract?sid=cc4c0d27-8270-4f9d-bd28-4e7af11fb993[science * 272 , * 1131 ( 1996 ) ] ; p. c. haljan , k .- a . brickman , l. deslauriers , p. j. lee , and c. monroe , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v94/i15/e153602[phys . * 94 , * 153602 ( 2005 ) ] ; m.j . mcdonnell , j.p . home , d.m . lucas , g. imreh , b.c . keitch , d.j . szwer , n.r . thomas , s.c . webster , d.n . stacey , a.m. steane , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v98/i6/e063603[phys . lett . , * 98 , * 063603 ( 2007 ) ] ; u. poschinger , a. walther , k. singer , and f. schmidt - kaler , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v105/i26/e263602[phys . rev . lett . * 105 , * 263602 ( 2010 ) . ] sackett , d. kielpinski , b.e . king , c. langer , v. meyer , c.j . myatt , m. rowe , q.a . turchette , w.m . itano , d.j . wineland , and c. monroe , http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v404/n6775/abs/404256a0.html[nature * 404 , * 256 ( 2000 ) ] ; d. leibfried , b. demarco , v. meyer , d. lucas , m. barrett , j. britton , w. m. itano , b. jelenkovic , c. langer , t. rosenband , and d. j. wineland , http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v422/n6930/abs/nature01492.html [ nature * 422 , * 412 ( 2003 ) ] ; j. benhelm , g. kirchmair , c. roos , and r. blatt , http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v4/n6/full/nphys961.html [ nat . phys . * 4 , * 463 ( 2008 ) ] ; a. noguchi , s. haze , k. toyoda , and s. urabe , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v108/i6/e060503[phys . * 108 , * 060503 ( 2011 ) ] . c. ospelkaus , u. warring , y. colombe , k. r. brown , j. m. amini , d. leibfried , and d. j. wineland , http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7359/full/nature10290.html[nature * 476 , * 181 ( 2011 ) ] ; a. khromova , ch . piltz , b. scharfenberger , t. f. gloger , m. johanning , a. f. varon , ch . wunderlich , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v108/i22/e220502[phys . * 108 , * 220502 ( 2012 ) . ] a. friedenauer , h. schmitz , j. t. glueckert , d. porras , and t. schaetz , http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v4/n10/full/nphys1032.html[nat . phys . * 4 , * 757 ( 2008 ) ] ; k. kim , m .- s . chang , s. korenblit , r. islam , e. e. edwards , j. k. freericks , g .- d . lin , l .- m . duan , and c. monroe , http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v465/n7298/full/nature09071.html[nature * 465 , * 590 ( 2010 ) ] ; r. islam , e. e. edwards , k. kim , s. korenblit , c. noh , h. carmichael , g .- d.lin , l .- m . duan , c .- c . joseph wang , j. k. freericks , and c. monroe , http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v2/n7/full/ncomms1374.html[nat . * 2 , * 377 ( 2011 ) ] ; b. p. lanyon , c. hempel , d. nigg , m. mller , r. gerritsma , f. zhringer , p. schindler , j. t. barreiro , m. rambach , g. kirchmair , m. hennrich , p. zoller , r. blatt , and c. f. roos , http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6052/57[science * 334 , * 57 ( 2011 ) ] ; j. w. britton , b. c. sawyer , a. c. keith , c .- c . j. wang , j. k. freericks , h. uys , m. j. biercuk and j. j. bollinger , http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v484/n7395/full/nature10981.html[nature * 484 , * 489 ( 2012 ) . ] h. schmitz , r. matjeschk , ch . schneider , j. glueckert , m. enderlein , t. huber , and t. schaetz , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v103/i9/e090504[phys . * 103 , * 090504 ( 2009 ) ] ; f. zhringer , g. kirchmair , r. gerritsma , e. solano , r. blatt , and c. f. roos , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v104/i10/e100503[phys . rev . lett . * 104 , * 100503 ( 2010 ) . ] h. rohde , s. t. gulde , c. f. roos , p. a. barton , d. leibfried , j. eschner , f. schmidt - kaler , r. blatt , http://iopscience.iop.org/1464-4266/3/1/357/[j . b * 3 , * s3 ( 2001 ) ] ; m. d. barrett , b. demarco , t. schaetz , v. meyer , d. leibfried , j. britton , j. chiaverini , w. m. itano , b. jelenkovic , j. d. jost , c. langer , t. rosenband , and d. j. wineland , http://pra.aps.org/abstract/pra/v68/i4/e042302[phys . a * 68 , * 042302 ( 2003 ) ] . j. p. home , m. j. mcdonnell , d. j. szwer , b. c. keitch , d. m. lucas , d. n. stacey , and a. m. steane , http://pra.aps.org/abstract/pra/v79/i5/e050305[phys . a * 79 , * 050305(r ) ( 2009 ) ] ; j. p. home , d. hanneke , j. d. jost , j. m. amini , d. leibfried , and d. j. wineland , http://www.sciencemag.org/content/325/5945/1227[science * 325 , * 1227 ( 2009 ) ] . a. imamoglu , http://pra.aps.org/abstract/pra/v50/i5/p3650_1[phys . a * 50 , * 3650 ( 1994 ) ] ; b. m. garraway , http://pra.aps.org/abstract/pra/v55/i3/p2290_1[phys . a * 55 , * 2290 ( 1997 ) . ] chin , a. rivas , s.f . huelga and m.b . * 51 * , 092109 ( 2010 ) ] . t. holstein , http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=articlelisturl&_method=list&_articlelistid=-67535988&_sort=r&_st=13&view=c&_acc t = c000057787&_version=1&_urlversion=0&_userid=2532525&md5=e2f1d3979b0d8f1c0b747b3c2c93f84e&searchtype = a[ann . * 8 , * 325 ( 1959 ) ] ; ( ibid ) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000349165990003x[*8 , * 343 ( 1959 ) ] d. j. wineland , c. monroe , w. m. itano , d. leibfried , b. e. king , and d. m. meekhof , http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/jres/103/3/cnt103-3.htm[j . res . * 103 , * 259 ( 1998 ) ] , _ and references therein_. j. dalibard and c. cohen - tannoudji , http://iopscience.iop.org/0022-3700/18/8/019[j . b : at . mol . * 18 , * 166 ( 1985 ) ] ; y. castin , h. wallis , and j. dalibard , http://www.opticsinfobase.org/josab/abstract.cfm?uri=josab-6-11-2046[j . b. * 6 , * 2046 ( 1989 ) . ] w. magnus , http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpa.3160070404/abstract[commun . pure appl . * 7 , * 649 ( 1954 ) ] ; s. blanes , f. casas , j. a. oteo and j. ros , http://iopscience.iop.org/0143-0807/31/4/020[eur . * 31 , * 907 ( 2010 ) . ] m. pons , v , ahufinger , ch . wunderlich , a. sanpera , s. braungardt , a. sen , u. sen , and m. lewenstein , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v98/i2/e023003[phys . * 98 , * 023003 ( 2007 ) ] ; a. bermudez , d. porras , and m. a. martin - delgado , http://pra.aps.org/abstract/pra/v79/i6/e060303[phys . a * 79 , * 060303 ( r ) ( 2009 ) ] ; p. hauke , f. m. cucchietti , a. mller - hermes , m.c . bauls , j. i. cirac , and m. lewenstein , http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/12/11/113037/[new j. phys . * 12 , * 113037 ( 2010 ) ] ; p. a. ivanov and f. schmidt - kaler , http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/13/12/125008[new j. phys . * 13 , * 125008 ( 2011 ) ] ; a. bermudez , j. almeida , f. schmidt - kaler , a. retzker , and m. b. plenio , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v107/i20/e207209[phys . * 107 , * 207209 ( 2011 ) ] ; r. schmied , j. h. wesenberg , and d. leibfried , http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/13/11/115011/[new j. phys . * 13 , * 115011 ( 2011 ) ] ; g .- d . lin , c. monroe , and l .- m . duan , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v106/i23/e230402[phys . * 106 , * 230402 ( 2011 ) ] ; a. bermudez , j. almeida , k. ott , h. kaufmann , s. ulm , u. poschinger , f. schmidt - kaler , a. retzker , and m. b. plenio , http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/14/9/093042/[new j. phys . * 14 , * 093042 ( 2012 ) . ] d. kielpinski , b. e. king , c. j. myatt , c. a. sackett , q. a. turchette , w. m. itano , c. monroe , d. j. wineland , and w. h. zurek , http://pra.aps.org/abstract/pra/v61/i3/e032310[phys . rev . a * 61 , * 032310 ( 2000 ) ] ; g. morigi and h. walther , http://epjd.epj.org/index.php?option=com_article&access=standard&itemid=129&url=/articles/epjd/abs/2001/02/d0131/d0131.h tml[eur . j. d * 13 , * 261 ( 2001 ) ] . g. schn and a.d . zaikin , http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037015739090156v[phys . rep . * 198 * , 237 ( 1990 ) ] . l. capriotti , a. cuccoli , a. fubini , v. tognetti , and r. vaia , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v94/i15/e157001[phys . * 94 * , 157001 ( 2005 ) ] . m. a. cazalilla , f. sols , and f. guinea , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v97/i7/e076401[phys . * 97 * , 076401 ( 2006 ) ] . f. verstraete , m. m. wolf , and j. i. cirac , http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v5/n9/abs/nphys1342.html[nature phys . * 5 * , 633 ( 2009 ) ] . j. eisert and t. prosen , e - print http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5013[arxiv:1012.5013 ( 2012 ) ] . s. morrison , a. s. parkins , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v100/i4/e040403[phys . lett . * 100 * , 040403 ( 2008 ) ] . t. prosen and e. ilievski , http://prl.aps.org/abstract/prl/v107/i6/e060403[phys . * 107 * , 060403 ( 2011 ) ] ; m. j. bhaseen , j. mayoh , b. d. simons , and j. keeling , http://pra.aps.org/abstract/pra/v85/i1/e013817[phys . a * 85 * , 013817 ( 2012 ) ] ; v. m. bastidas , c. emary , g. schaller , and t. brandes , http://pra.aps.org/abstract/pra/v86/i6/e063627[phys . a * 86 * , 063627 ( 2012 ) . ] Abstract:
[ "we propose a dissipative method to prepare the ground state of the isotropic xy spin hamiltonian in a transverse field . our model consists of a spin chain with nearest - neighbour interactions and an additional collective coupling of the spins to a damped harmonic oscillator . the latter provides an effective environment with a lorentzian spectral density and can be used to drive the chain asymptotically towards its multipartite - entangled ground state at a rate that depends on the degree of non - markovianity of the evolution . we also present a detailed proposal for the experimental implementation with a chain of trapped ions . the protocol does not require individual addressing , concatenated pulses , or multi - particle jump operators , and is capable of generating the desired target state in small ion chains with very high fidelities ." ]
13,804
13,804
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the fundamental theory of strong interactions , quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) , possesses an exact @xmath8 local gauge symmetry ( the color symmetry ) and an approximate global @xmath9 symmetry for @xmath10 massless quark flavours ( the chiral symmetry ) . for sufficiently low temperature and density quarks and gluons are confined into colorless hadrons ( i.e. , @xmath8 invariant configurations ) . thus , it is the chiral symmetry which predominantly determines hadronic interactions in the low - energy region . effective field theories which contain hadrons as degrees of freedom rather than quarks and gluons have been developed along two lines which differ in the way in which chiral symmetry is realized : linear @xcite and non - linear @xcite . in the non - linear realization , the so - called non - linear sigma model , the scalar states are integrated out , leaving the pseudoscalar states as the only degrees of the freedom . on the other hand , in the linear representation of the symmetry , the so - called linear sigma model , both the scalar and pseudoscalar degrees of freedom are present . in this work , we consider the linear representation of chiral symmetry . an exactly linearly realized chiral symmetry implies that the qcd eigenstates come in degenerate pairs , the so - called chiral partners . chiral partners have the same quantum numbers with the exception of parity and g - parity for example , the scalar states sigma and pion and the vector states @xmath11 and @xmath12 , respectively , are chiral partners . experimental data in vacuum and at sufficiently low temperatures and densities of matter , however , show that the mass degeneracy is lifted , because the chiral @xmath13 symmetry is broken in two ways : explicitly and spontaneously . due to the @xmath14 anomaly @xcite , the @xmath15 symmetry is broken explicitly by quantum effects to @xmath16 . in the case of small but nonzero degenerate quark masses , the latter is explicitly broken to @xmath17 . if the quark masses are not degenerate , the @xmath17 symmetry is furthermore explicitly broken to @xmath18 , corresponding to baryon number conservation . qcd also possesses discrete symmetries such as the charge conjugation ( _ c _ ) , parity ( _ p _ ) and time reversal ( _ t _ ) symmetry ( _ cpt _ ) , which are to a very good precision separately conserved by strong interactions . this fact offers further constraints in the construction of effective models of qcd . [ a review of a possible , although small , _ cp _ violation in strong interactions may be found e.g.in ref . @xcite . ] in addition to the explicit breaking of axial symmetry @xmath19 due to nonzero quark masses , the latter symmetry is also spontaneously broken in vacuum by the non - vanishing expectation value of the quark condensate : @xmath20 @xcite . this symmetry breaking mechanism leads to the emergence of @xmath21 pseudoscalar goldstone bosons , as well as of massive scalar states representing the chiral partners of the goldstone bosons . for @xmath22 , the three lightest mesonic states , the pions , are identified with these goldstone bosons of qcd . their non - vanishing mass arises due to the explicit breaking of the chiral symmetry , rendering them pseudo - goldstone bosons . in this paper we study an @xmath23 linear sigma model which contains scalar ( @xmath3 , @xmath24 ) and pseudoscalar ( @xmath25 , @xmath26 ) , and in addition also vector ( @xmath27 , @xmath28 ) and axial - vector ( @xmath29 , @xmath30 ) degrees of freedom . usually , such models are constructed under the requirement of local chiral invariance @xmath9 , with the exception of the vector meson mass term which renders the local symmetry a global one @xcite . in a slight abuse of terminology , we will refer to these models as locally chirally invariant models in the following . a study of the qcd phase transition and its critical temperature @xmath31 within such a model can be found e.g. in ref . @xcite . however , as shown in refs . @xcite , the locally invariant linear sigma model fails to simultaneously describe meson decay widths and pion - pion scattering lengths in vacuum . as outlined in ref . @xcite , there are at least two ways to solve this issue . one way is to utilize a model in which the ( up to the vector meson mass term ) local invariance of the theory is retained while higher - order terms are added to the lagrangian @xcite . the second way which is pursued here is the following : we construct a linear sigma model with global chiral invariance containing all terms up to naive scaling dimension four @xcite . the global invariance allows for additional terms to appear in our lagrangian in comparison to the locally invariant case presented e.g. in ref . we remark that , introducing a dilaton field , one can argue @xcite that chirally invariant terms of higher order than scaling dimension four should be absent . in ref . @xcite , we have presented a first study of meson decays and pion - pion scattering lengths in vacuum in the framework of the globally invariant linear sigma model . we have distinguished two different assignments for the scalar fields @xmath32 and @xmath33 : ( _ i _ ) they may be identified with @xmath1 and @xmath2 which are members of a nonet that in addition consists of @xmath34 and @xmath35 ; ( _ ii _ ) they may be identified with @xmath5 and @xmath6 which are members of a decuplet that in addition consists of @xmath36 , @xmath37 , and @xmath38 , where the additional scalar - isoscalar state emerges from the admixture of a glueball field @xcite . in the following , we will refer to assignment ( _ i _ ) as scenario i , and to assignment ( _ ii _ ) as scenario ii . in the latter , scalar mesons below 1 gev are not ( predominantly ) quark - antiquark states . their spectroscopic wave functions might contain a dominant tetraquark or mesonic molecular contribution @xcite . the correct assignment of the scalar quark - antiquark fields of the model to physical resonances is not only important as a contribution to the ongoing debate about the nature of these resonances , but it is also vital for a study of the properties of hadrons at nonzero temperature and density , where the chiral partner of the pion plays a crucial role @xcite . it is important to stress that the theoretical @xmath3 and @xmath4 fields entering the linear sigma model describe pure quark - antiquark states , just as all the other fields ( @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 , @xmath28 , @xmath29 , @xmath30 ) . this property can be easily proven by using well - known large-@xmath39 results @xcite : the mass and the decay widths of both @xmath3 and @xmath4 fields scale in the model as @xmath40 and @xmath41 , respectively . in this paper we first investigate the consequences of scenario i on various decay widths and pion - pion scattering lengths . this assignment is disfavored because a consistent description of all experimental data can not be achieved . to reach this conclusion , vector and axial - vector degrees of freedoms play an important role . on the one hand their decays ( such as @xmath42 and @xmath43 ) and the role of the @xmath11 meson in @xmath0 scattering provide strong constraints , on the other hand they affect , indirectly but sizably , some decay channels , such as @xmath44 . we then present a study of scenario ii . although the latter is not yet conclusive because additional scalar fields ( glueball , tetraquark ) are not yet taken into account , our preliminary results for the decay widths ( albeit not for the scattering length @xmath7 ) are consistent with the data . the paper is organized as follows : in sec . ii we present the lagrangian of our model and discuss the parameters which are known to very good precision and thus do not enter the fit of the decay widths and the scattering lengths . in sec . iii we present the formulas for the decay widths and the pion - pion scattering lengths which will be used to fit the remaining parameters and to compare the results to experimental data . this fit and comparison are discussed in sec . iv , both for scenario i and scenario ii . in sec . v we summarize our results in the conclusions and give an outlook to future work . in the appendix , we show the explicit form of our lagrangian in terms of the meson fields . the lagrangian of the globally invariant linear sigma model with @xmath45 symmetry for @xmath23 reads @xcite : @xmath46-m_{0}^{2 } \mathrm{tr}(\phi^{\dagger}\phi)-\lambda_{1}[\mathrm{tr}(\phi^{\dagger}% \phi)]^{2 } -\lambda_{2}\mathrm{tr}(\phi^{\dagger}\phi)^{2}\nonumber\\ & -\frac{1}{4}\mathrm{tr}[(l^{\mu\nu})^{2}+(r^{\mu\nu})^{2}]+\frac{m_{1}^{2}% } { 2 } \mathrm{tr}[(l^{\mu})^{2}+(r^{\mu})^{2}]+\mathrm{tr}[h(\phi+\phi ^{\dagger})]\nonumber\\ & + c(\det\phi+\det\phi^{\dagger})-2ig_{2}(\mathrm{tr}\{l_{\mu\nu}[l^{\mu } , l^{\nu}]\ } + \mathrm{tr}\{r_{\mu\nu}[r^{\mu},r^{\nu}]\})\nonumber\\ & -2g_{3}\left [ \mathrm{tr}\left ( \left\ { \partial_{\mu}l_{\nu}-iea_{\mu } [ t^{3},l_{\nu } ] + \partial_{\nu}l_{\mu}-iea_{\nu}[t^{3},l_{\mu}]\right\ } \{l^{\mu},l^{\nu}\}\right ) \right . \nonumber\\ & \hspace*{0.65 cm } + \left . \mathrm{tr } \left ( \left\ { \partial_{\mu}% r_{\nu}-iea_{\mu}[t^{3},r_{\nu } ] + \partial_{\nu}r_{\mu}-iea_{\nu}[t^{3}% , r_{\mu}]\right\ } \{r^{\mu},r^{\nu}\}\right ) \right ] \nonumber\\ & + \frac{h_{1}}{2}\mathrm{tr}(\phi^{\dagger}\phi)\mathrm{tr}[(l^{\mu})^{2 } + ( r^{\mu})^{2}]+h_{2}\mathrm{tr}[(\phi r^{\mu})^{2}+(l^{\mu}\phi)^{2 } ] + 2h_{3}\mathrm{tr}(\phi r_{\mu}\phi^{\dagger}l^{\mu}).\nonumber\\ & + g_{4}\left\ { \mathrm{tr}\left [ l^{\mu}l^{\nu}l_{\mu}l_{\nu}\right ] + \mathrm{tr}\left [ r^{\mu}r^{\nu}r_{\mu}r_{\nu}\right ] \right\ } + g_{5}\left\ { \mathrm{tr}\left [ l^{\mu}l_{\mu}l^{\nu}l_{\nu}\right ] + \mathrm{tr}\left [ r^{\mu}r_{\mu}r^{\nu}r_{\nu}\right ] \right\ } \nonumber\\ & + g_{6}\mathrm{tr}\left [ r^{\mu}r_{\mu}\right ] \,\mathrm{tr}\left [ l^{\nu}l_{\nu}\right ] + g_{7}\left\ { \mathrm{tr}[l^{\mu}l_{\mu } ] \,\mathrm{tr}[l^{\nu}l_{\nu}]+\mathrm{tr}[r^{\mu}r_{\mu}]\,\mathrm{tr } [ r^{\nu}r_{\nu}]\right\ } \;. \label{lagrangian}%\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that the locally chirally invariant linear sigma model emerges from the globally invariant lagrangian ( [ lagrangian ] ) by setting @xmath47 @xmath48 . in eq . ( [ lagrangian ] ) , @xmath49 contains scalar and pseudoscalar mesons , where @xmath50 , @xmath51 are the generators of @xmath52 in the fundamental representation and @xmath53 denotes the non - strange content of the @xmath25 meson . vector and axial - vector mesons are contained in the left - handed and right - handed vector fields : @xmath54 respectively . the covariant derivative @xmath55\ ] ] couples scalar and pseudoscalar degrees of freedom to vector and axial - vector ones as well as to the electromagnetic field @xmath56 . note that local chiral invariance requires @xmath57 . the left - handed and right - handed field strength tensors , @xmath58 -\left\ { \partial^{\nu}l^{\mu}-iea^{\nu}[t^{3},l^{\mu}]\right\ } \;,\\ r^{\mu\nu } & = \partial^{\mu}r^{\nu}-iea^{\mu}[t^{3},r^{\nu } ] -\left\ { \partial^{\nu}r^{\mu}-iea^{\nu}[t^{3},r^{\mu}]\right\ } \;,\end{aligned}\ ] ] respectively , couple vector and axial - vector mesons to the electromagnetic field @xmath56 . explicit breaking of the global symmetry is described by the term tr@xmath59\equiv h_{0}\sigma$ ] @xmath60 . the chiral anomaly is described by the term @xmath61 @xcite . the model has been extended to include the nucleon field and its putative chiral partner ; for details , see refs . @xcite . in the pseudoscalar and ( axial-)vector sectors the identification of mesons with particles listed in ref . @xcite is straightforward , as already indicated in eqs . ( [ scalars ] ) and ( [ vectors1])-([vectors ] ) : the fields @xmath26 and @xmath53 correspond to the pion and the @xmath62 counterpart of the @xmath25 meson , @xmath63 , with a mass of about @xmath64 mev . this value can be obtained by `` unmixing '' the physical @xmath25 and @xmath65 mesons , which also contain @xmath66 contributions . the fields @xmath67 and @xmath68 represent the @xmath69 and @xmath70 vector mesons , respectively , while the fields @xmath71 and @xmath72 represent the @xmath73 and @xmath74 axial - vector mesons , respectively . ( in principle , the physical @xmath27 and @xmath29 states also contain @xmath66 contributions , however their admixture is negligibly small . ) unfortunately , the identification of the @xmath3 and @xmath24 fields is controversial , the possibilities being the pairs @xmath75 and @xmath76 . as mentioned in the introduction , we will refer to these two assignments as scenarios i and ii , respectively . we discuss the implications of these two scenarios in the following . one may raise the question whether vector meson dominance ( vmd ) is still respected in the globally invariant linear sigma model ( [ lagrangian ] ) . as outlined in ref . @xcite , there are two ways to realize vmd in a linear sigma model . the standard version of vmd was introduced by sakurai @xcite and considers vector mesons as yang - mills gauge fields @xcite . the gauge symmetry is explicitly broken by the vector meson masses . another realisation of vmd was first explored by lurie @xcite whose theory contained a lagrangian which was globally invariant . it is interesting to note that lurie s lagrangian contained direct couplings of the photon to pions and @xmath11 mesons , as well as a @xmath11-@xmath77 coupling . it was shown in ref . @xcite that the two representations of vmd are equivalent if the @xmath11-@xmath77 coupling @xmath78 equals the photon-@xmath11 coupling @xmath79 ( the so - called `` universal limit '' ) . it was also shown that , if the underlying theory is globally invariant , the pion form factor at threshold @xmath80 for _ any _ value of the above mentioned couplings . on the other hand , in sakurai s theory @xmath81 unless one demands @xmath82 , or other parameters are adjusted in such a way that @xmath80 . in other words , for _ any _ globally invariant model , and thus also for ours , one has the liberty of choosing different values for the photon-@xmath11 and @xmath11-@xmath77 couplings , without violating vmd . the lagrangian ( [ lagrangian ] ) contains 16 parameters . however , the parameters @xmath83 with @xmath84 ... , @xmath85 are not relevant for the results presented here so that the number of undetermined parameters decreases to eleven : @xmath86 the squared tree - level masses of the mesons in our model contain a contribution arising from spontaneous symmetry breaking , proportional to @xmath87 . the value @xmath88 is the vacuum expectation value of the @xmath3 field and coincides with the minimum of the potential that follows from eq . ( [ lagrangian ] ) . the @xmath3 field is the only field with the quantum numbers of the vacuum , @xmath89 , i.e. , the condensation of which does not lead to the breaking of parity , charge conjugation , and lorentz invariance . the potential for the @xmath3 field reads explicitly @xmath90 and its minimum is determined by @xmath91 \phi - h_{0}\ ; \text{. } \label{minimum}%\ ] ] spontaneous symmetry breaking corresponds to the case when the potential @xmath92 assumes its minimum for a nonvanishing value @xmath93 . in order to determine the fluctuation of the @xmath3 field around the new vacuum , one shifts it by its vacuum expectation value @xmath94 , @xmath95 . the shift leads also to @xmath53-@xmath29 and @xmath26-@xmath30 mixing terms and thus to non - diagonal elements in the scattering matrix . these terms are removed from the lagrangian by shifting the @xmath29 and @xmath30 fields as follows : @xmath96 where we defined the quantities @xmath97 note that the field renormalisation of @xmath53 and @xmath26 guarantees the canonical normalization of the kinetic terms . this is necessary in order to interpret the fourier components of the properly normalized one - meson states as creation or annihilation operators @xcite . note also that the @xmath11 and @xmath27 masses as well as the @xmath29 and @xmath12 masses are degenerate in the globally as well as in the locally invariant model . once the shift @xmath95 and the transformations ( [ shifts ] ) have been performed , the mass terms of the mesons in the lagrangian ( [ lagrangian ] ) read : @xmath98 = m_{\pi}^{2}+2cz^{2}% \;,\label{eta}\\ m_{a_{0}}^{2 } & = m_{0}^{2}+c+\left ( \lambda_{1}+3\frac{\lambda_{2 } } { 2}\right ) \phi^{2}\;,\label{a0}\\ m_{\pi}^{2 } & = z^{2}\left [ m_{0}^{2}-c+\left ( \lambda_{1}+\frac { \lambda_{2}}{2}\right ) \phi^{2}\right ] \overset{(\ref{minimum})}{=}% \frac{z^{2 } h_{0}}{\phi}\;,\label{pion}\\ m_{\omega}^{2 } & = m_{\rho}^{2}=m_{1}^{2}+\frac{\phi^{2}}{2}(h_{1}% + h_{2}+h_{3})\;,\label{rho}\\ m_{f_{1}}^{2 } & = m_{a_{1}}^{2}=m_{1}^{2}+g_{1}^{2}\phi^{2}+\frac{\phi^{2}% } { 2 } ( h_{1}+h_{2}-h_{3})\;\text{. } \label{a1}%\end{aligned}\ ] ] in appendix a we show the lagrangian in the form when all shifts have been explicitly performed . from eqs . ( [ rho ] ) and ( [ a1 ] ) we obtain : @xmath99 the pion decay constant , @xmath100 is determined from the axial current , @xmath101 the large-@xmath39 dependence of the parameters is given by @xmath102 we remind the reader that a vertex of @xmath103 quark - antiquark mesons scales as @xmath104 . as a consequence , the parameters @xmath105 , @xmath106 scale as @xmath107 , because they are associated with a three - point vertex of quark - antiquark vector fields ( of the kind @xmath108 ) . similarly , the parameters @xmath109 , @xmath110 , @xmath111 scale as @xmath41 , because they are associated with quartic terms such as @xmath112 and @xmath113 . the parameter @xmath114 is suppressed by a factor @xmath39 although it enters quadratic mass - like terms . this is due to the fact that the axial anomaly is suppressed in the large-@xmath39 limit . as is evident from eq . ( [ eta ] ) , the @xmath115 meson would also be a goldstone boson for @xmath116 . the parameters @xmath117 , @xmath118 also describe quartic interactions , but are further suppressed by a factor @xmath119 because of the trace structure of the corresponding terms in the lagrangian . the quantities @xmath120 , @xmath121 are mass terms and therefore scale as @xmath40 . then the pion decay constant @xmath100 scales as @xmath122 . the quantity @xmath123 scales as @xmath122 in order that @xmath124 scales as @xmath40 as expected . note that without any assumptions about the @xmath3 , @xmath4 , and @xmath29 , @xmath12 fields , we immediately obtain that their masses scale as @xmath40 and their decay widths as @xmath41 , as we shall see in the following section . therefore , they must also correspond to quark - antiquark degrees of freedom . there are , however , also approaches to the phenomenology of low - lying axial - vector mesons , such as the one in ref . @xcite , where the bethe - salpeter equation is used to unitarize the scattering of vector and pseudoscalar mesons . here , the bethe - salpeter kernel is given by the lowest - order effective lagrangian . this leads to the dynamical generation of resonances , one of which has a pole mass of 1011 mev and is consequently assigned to the @xmath74 meson . this unitarized approach is used in ref . @xcite to study the large-@xmath39 behaviour of the dynamically generated resonances , with the conclusion that the @xmath74 resonance is not a genuine quark - antiquark state . however , it was shown in ref . @xcite that , while unitarizing the chiral lagrangian by means of a bethe - salpeter study allows one to find poles in the complex plane and identify them with physical resonances , it does not necessarily allow one to make a conclusion about the structure of those resonances in the large-@xmath39 limit . in order to be able to draw correct conclusions , a bethe - salpeter study requires at least one additional term of higher order not included in the lagrangian of refs . alternatively , the inverse amplitude method of refs . @xcite can be used . a very similar approach to the one in refs . @xcite was also used in ref . @xcite where a very good fit to the @xmath125 decay data from the aleph collaboration @xcite was obtained by fine - tuning the subtraction point of a loop diagram . note , however , that detuning the subtraction point by 5% will spoil the agreement with experimental data . alternately , these data may be described by approaches with the @xmath74 meson as an explicit degree of freedom , such as the one in ref . @xcite , where @xmath74 is a quark - antiquark state and where the experimental @xmath74 spectral function is fitted very well . in ref . @xcite , @xmath126 mev and a full width @xmath127 @xmath128 mev are obtained . note that our results , as will be shown later , give very good results on the @xmath74 phenomenology , for example in the @xmath129 and @xmath130 decay channels , see sec . iv.a.3 . for the following discussion , it is interesting to note that the @xmath11 meson mass , @xmath131 can be split into two contributions : the term @xmath121 which does not depend on the chiral condensate , and the term @xmath132 which depends quadratically on the condensate and vanishes in the chirally restored phase . we shall require that none of the two contributions be negative : in fact , a negative @xmath121 would imply that the system is unstable when @xmath133 ; a negative @xmath134 would imply that spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking decreases the @xmath11 mass . this is clearly unnatural because the breaking of chiral symmetry generates a sizable effective mass for the light quarks , which is expected to positively contribute to the meson masses . this positive contribution is a feature of all known models ( such as the nambu jona - lasinio model and constituent quark approaches ) . indeed , in an important class of hadronic models ( see ref . @xcite and refs . therein ) the only and obviously positive contribution to the @xmath11 mass is proportional to @xmath87 ( i.e. , @xmath135 ) . instead of the eleven parameters in eq . ( [ param ] ) , it is technically simpler to use the following , equivalent set of eleven parameters in the expressions for the physical quantities : @xmath136 the quantities @xmath124 , @xmath137 , @xmath138 are taken as the mean values for the masses of the @xmath77 , @xmath11 , and @xmath12 meson , respectively , as given by the pdg @xcite : @xmath139 mev , @xmath140 mev , and @xmath141 mev . while @xmath124 and @xmath137 are measured to very good precision , this is not the case for @xmath138 . the mass value given above is referred to as an `` educated guess '' by the pdg @xcite . therefore , we shall also consider a smaller value , as suggested e.g. by the results of ref . we shall see that , although the overall picture remains qualitatively unchanged , the description of the decay width of @xmath12 into @xmath142 can be substantially improved . as outlined in ref . @xcite , the mass of the @xmath53 meson can be calculated using the mixing of strange and non - strange contributions in the physical fields @xmath25 and @xmath143 : @xmath144 where @xmath145 denotes a pure @xmath146 state and @xmath147 @xcite . in this way , we obtain the value @xmath148 mev . given the well - known uncertainty of the value of @xmath149 , one could also consider other values , e.g. , @xmath150 , as published by the kloe collaboration @xcite . in this case , @xmath151 mev . the variation of the @xmath53 mass does not change the results significantly . the quantities @xmath88 and @xmath152 are linked to the pion decay constant as @xmath153 mev . therefore , the following six quantities remain as free parameters : @xmath154 the masses @xmath155 and @xmath156 depend on the scenario adopted for the scalar mesons . at the end of this subsection we report three useful formulas which link the parameters @xmath105 , @xmath111 , and @xmath157 of the original set ( [ param ] ) to the second set of parameters ( [ param2 ] ) [ see also eq . ( [ z ] ) ] : @xmath158 \text{. } \label{m1eq}%\end{aligned}\ ] ] in this section , we quote the formulas for the decay widths and the @xmath0 scattering lengths and specify their dependence on the parameters @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath152 , @xmath106 , @xmath118 , and @xmath110 . using the scaling behavior ( [ largen ] ) we obtain that all strong decays and scattering lengths scale as @xmath41 , as expected . for future use we introduce the momentum function @xmath159 in the decay process @xmath160 , with masses @xmath161 , respectively , the quantity @xmath162 represents the modulus of the three - momentum of the outgoing particles @xmath163 and @xmath114 in the rest frame of the decaying particle @xmath164 . the theta function ensures that the decay width vanishes below threshold . the decay width for @xmath42 reads @xmath165 ^{3/2 } \left [ g_{1 } z^{2 } + \left ( 1-z^{2}\right ) \frac{g_{2}}{2}\right ] ^{2 } \text{. } \label{rhopionpion}%\ ] ] the experimental value is @xmath166 mev @xcite . the small experimental error can be neglected and the central value is used as a further constraint allowing us to fix the parameter @xmath106 as function of @xmath152 : @xmath167 note that all input values in eq . ( [ g2z ] ) are experimentally known @xcite . the parameter @xmath168 is fixed via eq . ( [ g1 ] ) . as apparent from eq . ( [ g2z ] ) , two solutions for @xmath106 are obtained . the solution with the positive sign in front of the square root may be neglected because it leads to unphysically large values for the @xmath169 decay width , which is another quantity predicted by our study that also depends on @xmath106 [ see eq . ( [ a1rhopion ] ) ] . for example , the value @xmath170 ( see below ) would lead to @xmath171 which in turn would give @xmath172 gev clearly an unphysically large value . therefore , we will take the solution for @xmath106 with the negative sign in front of the square root . in this case , reasonable values for both @xmath106 ( see table [ table1 ] ) and @xmath173 ( see sec.iv.a.3 ) are obtained . the decay width @xmath175 reads @xmath176 ^{2}\;\text{. } \label{f1a0pion}%\ ] ] there is a subtle point to comment on here . when the quark - antiquark @xmath4 state of our model is identified as the @xmath2 meson of the pdg compilation ( scenario i ) , then this decay width can be used to fix the parameter @xmath110 as function of @xmath177 @xmath178 , by using the corresponding experimental value @xmath179 mev @xcite.@xmath180 again , there are two solutions , just as in the case of the parameter @xmath106 . how strongly the somewhat uncertain experimental value of @xmath181 influences the possible values of @xmath110 , depends on the choice of the sign in front of the square root in eq . ( [ h2z ] ) . varying @xmath182 within its experimental range of uncertainty changes the value of @xmath110 by an average of 25% if the negative sign is chosen , but the same variation of @xmath182 changes @xmath110 by an average of only 6% if the positive sign is considered . this is due to the fact that the solution with the positive square root sign yields larger values of @xmath183 , while the solution with the negative sign leads to @xmath184 . the absolute change of @xmath110 is the same in both cases . our calculations have shown that using the negative sign in front of the square root yields a too small value of the @xmath25-@xmath65 mixing angle @xmath185 . this follows by inserting @xmath110 into eq . ( [ a0etapion ] ) so that it is removed as a degree of freedom ( i.e. , replaced by @xmath152 ) and calculating the mixing angle @xmath149 from eq . ( [ a0etapion0 ] ) using the experimental value of the @xmath186 decay amplitude from ref . @xcite . for this reason , we only use the positive sign in front of the square root in eq . ( [ h2z ] ) , i.e. , the constraint leading to higher values of @xmath110 . then @xmath187 is obtained , in very good agreement with the central value quoted by the kloe collaboration @xcite , @xmath188 ( see also section iv.a.1 ) . it may be interesting to note that only the ( disregarded ) lower value of @xmath110 leads to the expected behaviour of the parameter @xmath118 which [ according to eq . ( [ largen ] ) ] should be large-@xmath39 suppressed : the lower value of @xmath110 yields @xmath189 whereas the higher value of @xmath110 yields @xmath190 ( see table _ _ [ table1 ] ) . note that if the quark - antiquark @xmath4 meson of our model is identified as the @xmath6 meson of the pdg compilation ( scenario ii ) then the described procedure of replacing @xmath110 by @xmath152 using eq . ( [ h2z ] ) is no longer applicable because the decay @xmath174 is kinematically not allowed and its counterpart @xmath191 has not been measured . our @xmath23 lagrangian contains the unphysical field @xmath53 . however , by making use of eq . ( [ phi ] ) and invoking the ozi rule , it is possible to calculate the decay amplitude for the physical process @xmath193 as @xmath194 from eq . ( [ lagrangian ] ) the formula for the decay amplitude containing the non - strange @xmath53 field is @xmath195 ( m_{a_{0}}% ^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2}-m_{\eta}^{2 } ) \right\ } \text{. } \label{a0etapion}%\ ] ] note that eq . ( [ a0etapion ] ) contains the unmixed mass @xmath196 which enters when expressing the coupling constants in terms of the parameters ( [ param2 ] ) , as well as the physical mass @xmath197 mev . the latter arises because the derivative couplings in the lagrangian lead to the appearance of scalar invariants formed from the four - momenta of the particles emerging from the decay , which can be expressed in terms of the physical ( invariant ) masses . the decay width @xmath198 follows from eq . ( [ a0etapion0 ] ) by including a phase space factor:@xmath199 ^{2}\text{. } \label{a0etapion2}%\ ] ] in the case of scenario i , in which @xmath200 , we shall compare the decay amplitude @xmath201 , eq . ( [ a0etapion0 ] ) , with the corresponding experimental value deduced from crystal barrel data : @xmath202 mev @xcite . this is preferable to the use of the decay width quoted by the pdg @xcite for @xmath2 , which refers to the mean peak width , an unreliable quantity due to the closeness of the kaon - kaon threshold . in the case of scenario ii , in which @xmath203 , it is also possible to calculate the decay width @xmath204 , using the ozi rule . the amplitude @xmath205 is obtained following the same steps as in the previous case , eq . ( [ a0etapion]):@xmath206 ( m_{a_{0}}^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2}-m_{\eta^{\prime}}^{2 } ) \right\ } \ ; , \label{a0etapion00}\ ] ] where the difference compared to eqs . ( [ a0etapion0 ] ) and ( [ a0etapion ] ) is the prefactor @xmath207 and the physical @xmath65 mass @xmath208 mev . the corresponding decay width reads:@xmath209 ^{2}\text{. } \label{a0eta'pion2}%\ ] ] we obtain the following formula for the @xmath43 decay width:@xmath210 ^{3}\text{. } \label{a1piongamma}%\ ] ] note that the @xmath43 decay width depends only on the renormalisation constant @xmath152 . using @xmath211 mev @xcite , one obtains @xmath212 unfortunately , the experimental error for the quantity @xmath213 is large . given that almost all quantities of interest depend very strongly on @xmath152 , a better experimental knowledge of this decay would be useful to constrain @xmath152 . in the study of scenario i this decay width will be part of a @xmath214 analysis , but still represents the main constraint for @xmath152 . we obtain the following formula : @xmath216 ( m_{\sigma}^{2}- 2\ , m_{\pi}^{2})\right\ } ^{2}\;. \label{sigmapionpion}%\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is apparent from eqs . ( [ largen ] ) that the sigma decay width decreases as the number of colours @xmath39 increases . thus , the sigma field in our model is a @xmath217 state @xcite . in scenario i we have assigned the @xmath3 field as @xmath1 , correspondingly we are working with the assumption that @xmath1 [ as well as @xmath2 ] is a @xmath217 state . in scenario ii , the same assumption is valid for the @xmath5 and @xmath6 states . note that in eq . ( [ sigmapionpion ] ) the first term in braces arises from the scalar @xmath219 vertex , while the second term comes from the coupling of the @xmath3 to the @xmath12 , which becomes a derivatively coupled pion after the shift ( [ shifts ] ) . because of the different signs , these two terms interfere destructively . as the decay width of a light @xmath3 meson into two pions can be very well reproduced in the linear sigma model without vector mesons ( corresponding to the case @xmath220 ) , this interference prevents obtaining a reasonable value for this decay width in the present model with vector mesons , see sec . this problem does not occur for a heavy @xmath3 meson , see sec . iv.b.3 and ref . @xcite . the formula for the decay width reads@xmath222 ^{2}\text{. } \label{a1sigmapion}%\ ] ] let @xmath224 be the four - momentum of the @xmath12 meson , @xmath225 the four - momentum of the @xmath11 meson and @xmath226 the four - momentum of the pion . then the following formula for the @xmath223 decay width is obtained : @xmath227 \text { , } \label{a1rhopion}%\ ] ] where @xmath228 is the vertex following from the relevant part of the lagrangian ( [ lagrangian ] ) that reads@xmath229 \right\}\ ] ] and @xmath230 thus , we have @xmath231 \right . \\ & \hspace*{1.3cm}-\left . 3\,\frac{g_{1}g_{2}(g_{1}^{2}-h_{3})}{m_{a_{1}}% ^{2}}\left ( m_{a_{1}}^{2}-m_{\rho}^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2}+2m_{a_{1}}e_{\pi}\right ) \right\ } \text{,}\\ ( h_{\mu\nu}k_{1}^{\nu})^{2 } & = z^{4}f_{\pi}^{2}\left\ { ( g_{1}^{2}% -h_{3})^{2}m_{\rho}^{2}+\frac{g_{1}^{2}g_{2}^{2}}{4m_{a_{1}}^{4}}[(m_{\pi}% ^{2}-m_{\rho}^{2})^{2}(m_{\pi}^{2}+m_{\rho}^{2}-2m_{a_{1}}^{2})+(m_{\pi}% ^{2}+m_{\rho}^{2})m_{a_{1}}^{4}\right . \\ & \hspace*{1.3cm}\left . -4(m_{a_{1}}^{2}-m_{\rho}^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2})m_{a_{1}% } ^{2}e_{\rho}e_{\pi}]+\frac{g_{1}g_{2}(g_{1}^{2}-h_{3})}{m_{a_{1}}^{2}}\left [ ( m_{a_{1}}^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2})m_{a_{1}}e_{\rho}-2m_{a_{1}}m_{\rho}^{2}\left ( e_{\pi}+\frac{e_{\rho}}{2}\right ) \right ] \right\ } \text{,}\\ ( h_{\mu\nu}p^{\mu})^{2 } & = z^{4}f_{\pi}^{2}\left\ { ( g_{1}^{2}-h_{3}% ) ^{2}m_{a_{1}}^{2}+\frac{g_{1}^{2}g_{2}^{2}}{4m_{a_{1}}^{4}}[(m_{a_{1}}% ^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2})^{2}(m_{a_{1}}^{2}+m_{\pi}^{2}-2m_{\rho}^{2})+(m_{\pi}% ^{2}+m_{a_{1}}^{2})m_{\rho}^{4}\right . \\ & \hspace*{1.3cm}\left . -4(m_{a_{1}}^{2}-m_{\rho}^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2})m_{a_{1}% } ^{2}e_{\rho}e_{\pi}]+\frac{g_{1}g_{2}(g_{1}^{2}-h_{3})}{m_{a_{1}}^{2}% } [ 2m_{a_{1}}^{2}e_{\rho}e_{\pi}-(m_{a_{1}}^{2}-m_{\rho}^{2}-m_{\pi}% ^{2})m_{a_{1}}^{2}]\right\ } \;,\\ ( h_{\mu\nu}p^{\mu}k_{1}^{\nu})^{2 } & = ( g_{1}^{2}-h_{3})^{2}z^{4}f_{\pi}% ^{2}m_{a_{1}}^{2}e_{\rho}^{2}\;\text{.}%\end{aligned}\ ] ] the partial wave decomposition @xcite leads to the following formula for the s - wave @xmath232 pion - pion scattering length @xmath7 ( in units of @xmath233):@xmath234\right\ } -\frac{5}{8}\frac { z^{2}m_{\sigma}^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2}}{f_{\pi}^{2}}\right . \nonumber\\ & \hspace*{1 cm } -\frac{3}{2}\left\ { g_{1}^{2}z^{2}\phi\frac{m_{\pi}^{2}% } { m_{a_{1}}^{4}}\left [ 2m_{a_{1}}^{2 } + m_{\rho}^{2}-\frac{\phi^{2}}{2 } ( h_{1}+h_{2}+h_{3})\right ] -\frac{z^{2}m_{\sigma}^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2}}{2\phi } \right\ } ^{2}\frac{1}{4m_{\pi}^{2}-m_{\sigma}^{2}}\nonumber\\ & \hspace*{1 cm } + \left . \left\ { g_{1}^{2}z^{2}\phi\frac{m_{\pi}^{2}% } { m_{a_{1}}^{4}}\left [ m_{\rho}^{2}-\frac{\phi^{2}}{2}(h_{1}+h_{2}% + h_{3})\right ] + \frac{z^{2}m_{\sigma}^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2}}{2\phi}\right\ } ^{2}\frac{1}{m_{\sigma}^{2}}\right ) \text{. } \label{a00}%\end{aligned}\ ] ] we use the value @xmath235 in accordance with the 2003 and 2004 data from the na48/2 collaboration @xcite . an analogous calculation leads to the s - wave @xmath236 pion - pion scattering length @xmath237 : @xmath238 \right . \nonumber\\ & \hspace*{1 cm } -\left . \left\ { g_{1}^{2}z^{2}\phi\frac{m_{\pi}^{2}% } { m_{a_{1}}^{4}}\left [ m_{\rho}^{2}-\frac{\phi^{2}}{2}(h_{1}+h_{2}% + h_{3})\right ] + \frac{z^{2}m_{\sigma}^{2}-m_{\pi}^{2}}{2\phi}\right\ } ^{2}\frac{1}{m_{\sigma}^{2}}\right ) \text{. } \label{a02}%\end{aligned}\ ] ] the experimental result for @xmath237 from the na48/2 collaboration is @xmath239 @xcite . note that the @xmath0 scattering lengths were also studied away from threshold in ref . @xcite , in a model quite similar to ours . in this section we discuss two different interpretations of the scalar mesons . the following subsection describes the results obtained when @xmath1 and @xmath2 are interpreted as scalar quarkonia ( scenario i ) . then we discuss the results obtained when @xmath5 and @xmath6 are interpreted as scalar quarkonia ( scenario ii ) . as a first step we utilize the central value of the experimental result @xmath240 mev @xcite in order to express the parameter @xmath106 as a function of @xmath152 via eq . ( [ g2z ] ) . moreover , we fix the mass @xmath241 gev @xcite and we also use the central value @xmath242 mev to express @xmath110 as a function of @xmath152 . the results are practically unaffected by the 6% uncertainty in @xmath243 originating from the uncertainty in @xmath182 , see eq . ( [ h2z ] ) . as a result , the set of free parameters in eq . ( [ param3 ] ) is further reduced to three parameters : @xmath244 note that in this scenario the field @xmath3 is identified with the resonance @xmath1 , but the experimental uncertainty on its mass is so large that it does not allow us to fix @xmath155 . we therefore keep @xmath155 as a free parameter . we now determine the parameters @xmath152 , @xmath118 , and @xmath155 using known data on the @xmath43 decay width ( [ a1piongamma ] ) and on the @xmath0 scattering lengths @xmath7 and @xmath237 reported in eqs . ( [ a00 ] ) and ( [ a02 ] ) . this is a system of three equations with three variables and can be solved uniquely . we make use of the @xmath214 method in order to determine not only the central values for our parameters but also their error intervals : @xmath245 the errors for the model parameters are calculated as the square roots of the diagonal elements of the inverted hessian matrix obtained from @xmath246 . the minimal value is obtained for @xmath247 , as expected given that the parameters are determined from a uniquely solvable system of equations . the values of the parameters are as follows : @xmath248 clearly , the error intervals for @xmath155 and @xmath118 are very large . fortunately , it is possible to constrain the @xmath118 error interval as follows . as described at the end of sec . ii.b , the @xmath11 mass squared contains two contributions the bare mass term @xmath121 and the quark condensate contribution ( @xmath249 ) . the contribution of the quark condensate is special for the globally invariant sigma model ; in the locally invariant model @xmath137 is always equal to @xmath157 @xcite . each of these contributions should have at most the value of 775.49 mev ( @xmath250 ) because otherwise either the bare mass or the quark condensate contribution to the rho mass would be negative , which appears to be unphysical . a plot of the function @xmath251 see eq . ( [ m1eq ] ) , for the central values of @xmath252 and @xmath253 mev is shown in fig . [ m1f ] . as function of @xmath118 , constrained at the central value of @xmath252 . the black dot marks the position of central values @xmath190 and @xmath254 mev.,width=377 ] note that varying the value of @xmath255 within its experimental boundaries would only very slightly change @xmath118 by @xmath256 and this parameter is thus unaffected by the experimental error for @xmath257 . if the value of @xmath157 was known exactly , then eq . ( [ m1eq ] ) would allow us to constrain @xmath118 via @xmath152 . however , given that at this point we can only state that @xmath258 , for each @xmath152 one may consider all values of @xmath118 between two boundaries , one obtained from the condition @xmath259 and another obtained from the condition @xmath260 . for example , using the central value of @xmath252 , we obtain @xmath261 . the lower boundary follows from @xmath262 and the upper boundary from @xmath263 , see fig . note that the central value @xmath190 from eq . ( [ ksquared ] ) corresponds to @xmath254 mev . if the minimal value of @xmath264 is used , then @xmath265 is obtained from @xmath262 and @xmath266 from @xmath263 . thus , @xmath267 for @xmath264 . analogously , @xmath268 is obtained for the maximal value @xmath269 . clearly , each lower boundary for @xmath118 is equivalent to @xmath270 and each upper boundary for @xmath118 is equivalent to @xmath263 . thus , in the following we will only state the values of @xmath152 and @xmath157 ; @xmath118 can always be calculated using eq . ( [ m1eq ] ) . in this way , the dependence of our results on @xmath157 and thus on the origin of the @xmath11 mass will be exhibited . the value of @xmath155 can be constrained in a way similar to @xmath118 using the scattering length @xmath7 ; the scattering length @xmath237 possesses a rather large error interval making it unsuitable to constrain @xmath155 . figure [ a00a02f ] shows the different values for @xmath7 and @xmath271 depending on the choice of @xmath152 and @xmath157 . [ h ] a00a02-paper.eps it is obvious that the value of @xmath7 is only consistent with the na48/2 value @xcite , if @xmath155 is in the interval [ 288 , 477 ] mev , i.e. , @xmath272 mev . this value for @xmath155 follows if the parameters @xmath152 and @xmath157 are varied within the allowed boundaries . if we only consider the @xmath7 curve that is obtained for the central values of @xmath152 and @xmath157 , a much more constrained value of @xmath273 mev follows from fig . [ a00a02f ] . we will be working with the broader interval of @xmath155 . even then , constraining @xmath157 to the interval @xmath274 $ ] , the error bars for @xmath155 are reduced by at least a factor of three in comparison to the result ( [ ksquared ] ) following from the @xmath214 calculation . we summarize our results for the parameters @xmath152 and @xmath155 : @xmath275 the central values of all parameters of the original set ( [ param ] ) are given in table _ _ [ table1 ] . they follow from the @xmath214 fit ( @xmath155 , @xmath118 ) , via decay width constraints ( @xmath110 , @xmath106 ) , and from eqs . ( [ sigma ] ) ( [ a1 ] ) and ( [ g1 ] ) ( [ h3 ] ) . the central values of @xmath152 , @xmath155 , and @xmath118 , eq . ( [ ksquared ] ) , have been used to calculate all other parameters . we neglect the errors , apart from those of @xmath157 , which in this scenario vary in a large range . [ c]|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|__parameter _ _ & @xmath155 & @xmath118 & @xmath110 & @xmath111 & @xmath105 & @xmath106 & @xmath276 & @xmath157 & @xmath117 & @xmath109 & @xmath114 & @xmath277 + _ value _ & 332 mev & -68 & 80 & 2.4 & 6.4 & 3.1 & 210 mev & 652@xmath278 mev & -14 & 33 & 88744 mev@xmath279 & @xmath280 mev@xmath281 + note that the values of @xmath237 depend strongly on the choice of the parameters @xmath152 and @xmath157 . whereas for the central values of @xmath152 and @xmath157 this scattering length is constant and has the value @xmath282 , its value increases if @xmath152 and @xmath157 are considered at their respective boundaries , see fig . [ a00a02f ] . the value of @xmath152 alone allows us to calculate certain decay widths in the model . for example , as a consistency check we obtain @xmath283 mev which is in good agreement with the experimental result . also , given that the @xmath284 decay amplitude only depends on @xmath152 , it is possible to calculate the value of this amplitude , eq . ( [ a0etapion ] ) . for @xmath252 , we obtain @xmath285 mev for the decay amplitude @xmath286 involving the physical @xmath25 field if the @xmath25-@xmath65 mixing angle of @xmath287 @xcite is taken . the crystal barrel data @xcite read @xmath288 mev and hence there is an approximate discrepancy of 20% . if the kloe collaboration @xcite value of @xmath150 is considered , then the value of @xmath289 mev follows in perfect agreement with the crystal barrel value . from this we conclude that this scenario prefers a relatively large value of the @xmath290-@xmath65 mixing angle . in fact , if we use the crystal barrel value @xmath288 mev as input , we would predict @xmath291 for the central value of @xmath152 as well as @xmath292 and @xmath293 for the highest and lowest values of @xmath152 , respectively , i.e. , @xmath294 . this is in excellent agreement with the kloe collaboration result @xmath295 . the sigma decay width @xmath296 depends on all three parameters @xmath152 , @xmath157 ( originally @xmath118 ) , and @xmath155 . in fig . [ sigmaf1 ] we show the dependence of this decay width on the sigma mass for fixed values of @xmath152 and @xmath157 , varying the latter within their respective boundaries . [ h ] sigmazerfall-paper.eps generally , the values that we obtain are too small when compared to the pdg data @xcite and to other calculations of the sigma meson decay width , such as the one performed by leutwyler _ @xcite who found @xmath297 mev and pelez _ et al . _ @xcite who found @xmath298 mev . the largest values for the decay width that we were able to obtain within our model are for the case when @xmath152 is as small as possible , @xmath264 , and @xmath135 , i.e. , when the @xmath11 mass is solely generated by the quark condensate . as seen above , for this case the scattering lengths allow a maximum value @xmath299 mev , for which @xmath300 mev . in all other cases , the decay width is even smaller . however , as will be discussed in sec . iv.a.3 , the case @xmath135 leads to the unphysically small value @xmath301 and should therefore not be taken too seriously . as apparent from fig . [ a00a02f ] , excluding small values of @xmath157 would require smaller values for @xmath155 in order to be consistent with the scattering lengths . according to fig . [ sigmaf1 ] , however , this in turn leads to even smaller values for the decay width . hence , we conclude that the isoscalar meson in our model can not be @xmath1 , thus excluding that this resonance is predominantly a @xmath217 state and the chiral partner of the pion . then the interpretation of the isospin - one state @xmath2 as a ( predominantly ) quarkonium state is also excluded . the only choice is to consider scenario ii , see sec . iv.b , i.e. , to interpret the scalar states above 1 gev , @xmath5 and @xmath6 , as being predominantly quarkonia . if the decay width of @xmath5 can be described by the model , this would be a very strong indication that these higher - lying states can be indeed interpreted as ( predominantly ) @xmath217 states . note that very similar results about the nature of the light scalar mesons were also found using different approaches : from an analysis of the meson behaviour in the large-@xmath39 limit in refs . @xcite and @xcite as well as from lattice studies , such as those in refs . @xcite . we remark that the cause for preventing a reasonable fit of the light sigma decay width is the interference term arising from the vector mesons in eq . ( [ sigmapionpion ] ) . in the unphysical case without vector meson degrees of freedom , a simultaneous fit of the decay width and the scattering lengths is possible @xcite . we first consider the decay width @xmath302 . for a given @xmath138 , this decay width depends only on @xmath152 . the pdg quotes a rather large band of values , @xmath303 mev . for @xmath141 mev , our fit of meson properties yields @xmath304 . the ensuing region is shown as shaded area in fig . [ a1rhopif ] . for @xmath141 mev , @xmath305 decreases from 2.4 gev to 353 mev , if @xmath152 varies from 1.47 to 1.87 . we also observe from fig . [ a1rhopif ] that the range of values for @xmath152 , which give values for @xmath302 consistent with the experimental error band , becomes larger if one considers smaller masses for the @xmath12 meson . we have taken @xmath306 mev and @xmath307 mev , the latter being similar to the values used in refs . @xcite and @xcite . repeating our calculations , we obtain a new range of possible values for @xmath152 , @xmath308 for @xmath309 mev and @xmath310 for @xmath311 mev . for the respective central values of @xmath152 we then compute @xmath312 mev ( @xmath313 ) and @xmath314 mev ( @xmath315 ) , in good agreement with experimental data . all other results remain valid when @xmath138 is decreased by about 100 mev . most notably , the @xmath1 decay width remains too small . [ h ] a1rhopion-paper1.eps we also consider the @xmath221 decay width . experimental data on this decay channel @xcite are inconclusive . the value @xmath316 mev is obtained for the central values of @xmath152 , @xmath157 , @xmath155 , and @xmath182 ( which was used to constrain @xmath110 via @xmath152 ) . taking the limit @xmath135 pulls the value of @xmath317 down to practically zero , regardless whether @xmath318 or @xmath319 . this is an indication that the @xmath135 limit , where @xmath137 is completely generated from the quark condensate , can not be physical . note that the case @xmath320 and @xmath262 , i.e. , where the quark condensate contribution to the @xmath11 mass vanishes , leads to a rather large value of @xmath321 , e.g. , for the central value of @xmath322 mev the value of @xmath323 mev follows . interestingly , this picture persists even if lower values of @xmath138 are considered . improving experimental data for this decay channel would allow us to further constrain our parameters . so far , the values of the scattering lengths used in our fit , @xmath324 and @xmath325 @xcite , account for the small explicit breaking of isospin symmetry due to the difference of the up and down quark masses . however , in our model the isospin symmetry is exact . thus , one should rather use the isospin - exact values @xmath326 and @xmath327 @xcite . in this section we will briefly show that the conclusions reached so far remain qualitatively unchanged if the isospin - exact values for the scattering lengths are considered . performing the @xmath214 fit , eq . ( [ chi ] ) , with @xmath328 , @xmath329 and @xmath330 as experimental input yields @xmath331 unchanged in comparison with the previous case ( @xmath152 is largely determined by @xmath332 which is the same in both @xmath214 calculations ) , @xmath333 , and @xmath334 mev . note that in this case the errors are much smaller than previously . the reason is that the mean value of @xmath155 is almost on top of the two - pion decay threshold and thus leads to an artificially small error band . for such small values of @xmath335 the decay width @xmath336 is at least an order of magnitude smaller than the physical value , but even for values of @xmath335 up to 500 mev ( not supported by our error analysis ) the decay width never exceeds 150 mev , see fig . [ sigmaf1 ] . a possible way to resolve the problem of the unphysically small two - pion decay width of the sigma meson is to identify the fields @xmath3 and @xmath4 of the model with the resonances @xmath5 and @xmath6 , respectively . thus , the scalar quarkonium states are assigned to the energy region above 1 gev . in the following we investigate the consequences of this assignment . however , the analysis can not be conclusive for various reasons : 1 . the glueball field is missing . many studies find that its role in the mass region at about @xmath337 gev is crucial , since it mixes with the other scalar resonances . the light scalar mesons below 1 gev , such as @xmath1 and @xmath2 , are not included as elementary fields in our model . the question is if they can be dynamically generated from the pseudoscalar fields already present in our model by solving a bethe - salpeter equation . if not , they should be introduced as additional elementary fields from the very beginning [ see also the discussion in ref . 3 . due to absence of the resonance @xmath1 , the @xmath0 scattering length @xmath338 can not be correctly described at tree - level : whereas @xmath237 stays always within the experimental error band , @xmath7 clearly requires a light scalar meson for a proper description of experimental data because a large value of @xmath155 drives this quantity to the weinberg limit ( @xmath339 ) which is outside the experimental error band . despite these drawbacks , we turn to a quantitative analysis of this scenario . as in scenario i , the parameter @xmath106 can be expressed as a function of @xmath152 by using the @xmath42 decay width ( [ rhopionpion ] ) . however , the parameter @xmath110 can no longer be fixed by the @xmath340 decay width : the @xmath341 meson is now identified with the @xmath6 resonance listed in ref . @xcite , with a central mass of @xmath342 mev , and thus @xmath343 is too light to decay into @xmath341 and @xmath77 . one would be able to determine @xmath243 from the ( energetically allowed ) decay @xmath344 , but the corresponding decay width is not experimentally known . instead of performing a global fit , it is more convenient to proceed step by step and calculate the parameters @xmath345 explicitly . we vary @xmath346 within the experimentally known error band @xcite and check if our result for @xmath347 is in agreement with experimental data . we first determine @xmath152 from @xmath43 , eq.([a1piongamma ] ) , and obtain @xmath348 . we then immediately conclude that the @xmath223 decay width , eq.([a1rhopion ] ) , will remain the same as in scenario i because this decay width depends on @xmath152 ( which is virtually the same in both scenarios ) and @xmath106 [ which is fixed via @xmath349 , eq . ( [ g2z ] ) , in both scenarios ] . the parameter @xmath118 , being large-@xmath39 suppressed , will be set to zero in the present study . we then only have to determine the parameter @xmath110 . this is done by fitting the total decay width of the @xmath6 meson to its experimental value @xcite , @xmath350 although kaons have not been included into the calculations , we can easily evaluate the decay into @xmath351 by using flavour symmetry @xmath352^{2}\ ; , \label{a0kk2 } \\ a_{a_{0}kk}(z , h_{2 } ) & = & \frac{1}{2 z f_\pi}\left\ { m_{\eta_{n}}^{2}-m_{a_{0}}^{2 } + \left ( 1 - \frac{1}{z^2 } \right ) \left [ 1-\frac{1}{2 } \frac{z^{2}\phi^{2}}{m_{a_{1}}^{2}}(h_{2}-h_{3})\right ] ( m_{a_{0}}^{2}-2m_{k}^{2 } ) \right\}\ ; .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the remaining , experimentally poorly known decay width @xmath353 can be calculated from the sequential decay @xmath354 note that the first decay step requires the @xmath11 to be slightly below its mass - shell , since @xmath355 . we denote the off - shell mass of the @xmath11 meson by @xmath356 . from the lagrangian ( [ lagrangian ] ) we obtain the following formula for the @xmath357 decay width : @xmath358 \;.\ ] ] the full decay width @xmath359 is then obtained from the following equation : @xmath360 where @xmath361 is the mass distribution of the @xmath11 meson , which is taken to be of relativistic breit - wigner form : @xmath362 where @xmath363 mev and @xmath140 mev @xcite . ( in general , one should use the theoretical quantity @xmath349 , which is itself a function of @xmath356 , instead of @xmath364 , see for instance ref . @xcite and refs . therein this is , however , numerically irrelevant in the following . ) the normalization constant @xmath365 is chosen such that @xmath366 in agreement with the interpretation of @xmath367 as the probability that the off - shell @xmath11 meson has a mass between @xmath356 and @xmath368 inserting eqs . ( [ a0etapion2 ] ) , ( [ a0etapion2 ] ) , ( [ a0kk2 ] ) , and ( [ a0omegapionpion2 ] ) into eq . ( [ a01450 ] ) , we can express @xmath243 as a function of @xmath152 , analogously to eq . ( [ g2z ] ) where @xmath106 was expressed as a function of @xmath152 . similar to that case , we obtain two bands for @xmath243 , @xmath369 and @xmath370 , the width of the bands corresponding to the uncertainty in determining @xmath152 , @xmath348 . both bands for @xmath243 remain practically unchanged if the @xmath371 experimental uncertainty of @xmath372 is taken into account and thus we only use the mean value @xmath373 mev in the following . since @xmath374 is assumed to be zero , eq . ( [ m1eq ] ) allows to express @xmath375 as a function of @xmath152 , @xmath376 ( we neglect the experimental uncertainties of @xmath377 , and @xmath378 ) . the result is shown in fig . [ m1s2f ] . the first band of ( lower ) @xmath110 values should be discarded because it leads to @xmath379 . the second set of ( higher ) values leads to @xmath380 only if the lower boundary for @xmath152 is 1.60 rather than 1.46 . thus , we shall use the set of larger @xmath110 values and take the constraint @xmath380 into account by restricting the values for @xmath152 to the range @xmath381 . as can be seen from fig . [ m1s2f ] , this sets a lower boundary for the value of @xmath375 , @xmath382 mev . thus , in this scenario we obtain @xmath383 mev . the values for the other parameters can be found in table [ table2 ] ( only central values are shown with the exception of @xmath157 where the corresponding uncertainties are stated as well ) . [ h ! ] m1s2.eps [ c]|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|__parameter _ _ & @xmath118 & @xmath110 & @xmath111 & @xmath105 & @xmath106 & @xmath120 & @xmath157 & @xmath117 & @xmath109 & @xmath114 & @xmath123 + _ value _ & 0 & 4.7 & 2.4 & 6.4 & 3.1 & -811987 mev@xmath279 & 720@xmath384 mev & -3.6 & 84 & 88747 mev@xmath279 & @xmath280 mev@xmath281 + @xmath385 note that @xmath386 in agreement with the expectations from the large-@xmath39 limit , eq . ( [ largen ] ) . the value of @xmath387 mev is sizable and constitutes a dominant contribution to the @xmath11 mass . this implies that non - quark contributions , for instance a gluon condensate , play a decisive role in the @xmath11 mass generation . as a final step , we study the ratios @xmath388 and @xmath389 their experimental values read @xcite @xmath390 using the central value @xmath252 and @xmath391 for the @xmath392 mixing angle , we obtain @xmath393 and @xmath394 . the latter is in very good agreement with the experiment , the former a factor of two larger . note , however , that according to eqs . ( [ a0etapion0 ] ) and ( [ a0etapion00 ] ) the value of the ratio @xmath395 is proportional to @xmath396 . if a lower value of the angle is considered , e.g. , @xmath397 , then we obtain @xmath398 for the central value of @xmath152 and the central value of @xmath399 in eq . ( [ a01450 ] ) . taking @xmath319 and the upper boundary @xmath400 mev results in @xmath401 , i.e. , in agreement with the experimental value . therefore , our results in this scenario favour a smaller value of @xmath149 than the one suggested by the kloe collaboration @xcite . it is possible to calculate the decay width @xmath402 using eq . ( [ a0omegapionpion2 ] ) . we have obtained a very small value @xmath403 mev . from eq . ( [ a0etapion2 ] ) we obtain @xmath404 89.5 mev , such that the ratio @xmath405 , in contrast to the results of ref . @xcite . it is now possible to calculate the width for the @xmath406 decay using eq . ( [ sigmapionpion ] ) . the decay width depends on the @xmath5 mass , @xmath152 , @xmath118 , and @xmath110 which is expressed via @xmath152 using eq . ( [ a01450 ] ) . the values of the latter three are listed in table _ _ [ table2 ] . in fig . [ f0pionpionf ] we show the decay width as a function of the mass of @xmath407 . assuming that the two - pion decay dominates the total decay width , we observe a good agreement with the experimental values if @xmath408 mev . other contributions to the decay width are likely to reduce this upper bound on @xmath409 somewhat . nevertheless , the correspondence with the experiment is a lot better in this scenario where we have identified @xmath5 rather than @xmath1 as the ( predominantly ) isoscalar @xmath217 state . note that this result has been obtained using the decay width of the @xmath6 meson ( in order to express @xmath110 via @xmath152 ) , which is also assumed to be a scalar @xmath217 state in this scenario . it is remarkable that vector mesons are crucial to obtain realistic values for the decay width of @xmath407 : without vector mesons , the decay width is @xmath410 gev and thus much too large . this is why scenario ii has not been considered in the standard linear sigma model . [ h ] f0pionpion.eps the four - body decay @xmath411 can also be studied . similarly to the @xmath412 decay , we view @xmath413 as a sequential decay of the form @xmath414 . the lagrangian ( [ lagrangian ] ) leads to@xmath415 \text { , } \label{f0rhorho}%\ ] ] where @xmath416 and @xmath417 are the off - shell masses of the @xmath11 mesons . the decay width @xmath418 is then given by @xmath419 with @xmath420 from eq . ( [ f0rhorho ] ) and @xmath361 from eq . ( [ drho ] ) . using the previous values for the parameters we obtain that the @xmath421 contribution for the decay is small : @xmath422 mev . ( the error comes from varying @xmath152 between 1.6 and 1.88 . ) @xcite quotes 54 mev for the total @xmath423 decay width . since ref . @xcite ascertains that about 26% of the total @xmath423 decay width originates from the @xmath421 decay channel , our result is consistent with these findings . we have presented a linear sigma model with vector mesons and global chiral invariance . the motivation for considering global invariance rather than the standard sakurai model with local chiral invariance ( with the exception of the vector - meson mass term ) was that the latter fails to describe some important low - energy meson decay processes correctly , most notably the two - pion decay width of the @xmath11 meson @xcite . this lagrangian describes mesons as pure quarkonium states . as shown in sec . iv.a , the resulting low - energy phenomenology is in general in good agreement with experimental data with one exception : the model fails to correctly describe the @xmath424 decay width . this led us to conclude that @xmath1 and @xmath2 can not be predominantly @xmath217 states . assigning the scalar fields @xmath3 and @xmath4 of the model to the @xmath5 and @xmath6 resonances , respectively , improves the results for the decay widths considerably . we have obtained @xmath425-@xmath426 mev for @xmath427-@xmath428 mev ( see fig . [ f0pionpionf ] ) . thus , the scenario in which the scalar states above 1 gev , @xmath5 and @xmath6 , are considered to be ( predominantly ) @xmath217 states appears to be favoured over the assignment in which @xmath1 and @xmath2 are considered ( predominantly ) @xmath217 states . however , a more detailed study of this scenario is necessary , because a glueball state with the same quantum numbers mixes with the quarkonium states . this allows to include the experimentally well - known resonance @xmath36 into the study . of course , interpreting @xmath5 and @xmath6 as @xmath217 states leads to question about the nature of @xmath1 and @xmath2 . their presence is necessary for the correct description of @xmath0 scattering lengths that differ from experiment for too large values of the isoscalar mass ( see sec . we distinguish two possibilities : ( i ) they can arise as ( quasi-)molecular states . this is possible if the attraction in the @xmath0 and @xmath351 channels is large enough . in order to prove this , one should solve the corresponding bethe - salpeter equation in the framework of scenario ii . in this case @xmath1 and @xmath2 can be classified as genuinely dynamically generated states and should not appear in the lagrangian , see the discussion in ref . @xcite . if , however , the attraction is not sufficient to generate the two resonances @xmath1 and @xmath2 we are led to the alternative possibility that ( ii ) these two scalar states must be incorporated into the model as additional tetraquark states . in this case they shall appear from the very beginning in the lagrangian and should not be considered as dynamically generated states . of course , the isoscalar tetraquark , quarkonium , and glueball will mix to produce @xmath429 and @xmath430 , and the isovector tetraquark and quarkonium will mix to produce @xmath431 and @xmath432 . the issue of restoration of chiral symmetry at nonzero temperature and density is one of the fundamental questions of modern hadron and nuclear physics , see , e.g. , refs . linear sigma models constitute an effective approach to study chiral symmetry restoration because they contain from the onset not only pseudoscalar and vector mesons , but also their chiral partners with which they become degenerate once the chiral symmetry has been restored . once vacuum phenomenology is reasonably well reproduced within our model , we also plan to apply it to studies of chiral symmetry restoration at nonzero temperatures and densities . another important check of the model is the description of the aleph data for the decay of the @xmath125 lepton into two and three pions @xcite . in this way , we will have a better constraint on the parameters of the model , e.g. the value for the @xmath12 mass . an extension of the model to @xmath433 can be performed @xcite ; with the exception of the strange quark condensate , no further free parameters will arise in this extension . however , much more data are available for the strange mesons , which constitute an important test for the validity of our approach . the authors thank j. schechter , f. sannino , j.r . pelez , s.gallas , and s. strber for valuable discussions . the work of d.p . was partially supported by the foundation `` polytechnical society '' . the work of d.p . and f.g . was partially supported by bmbf . the work of d.h.r.was supported by the extreme matter institute emmi . this work was ( financially ) supported by the helmholtz international center for fair within the framework of the loewe program launched by the state of hesse . this is the final form of the lagrangian ( [ lagrangian ] ) that is obtained after the shifts ( [ shifts ] ) and the renormalisation of the pseudoscalar wave functions ; @xmath434 ; @xmath435 ; ( @xmath436)@xmath437 marks the third component of the vector @xmath436 . note that the term @xmath438 contains the ( axial-)vector four - point vertices [ the terms @xmath439 in the lagrangian ( [ lagrangian ] ) ] . we do not give the explicit form of @xmath438 because it is not relevant for the results that are presented in this paper . @xmath440 \sigma^{2}\\ & + \,\frac{1}{2}\,(z\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}+g_{1}z\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\times \vec{\pi}-g_{1}f_{1}^{\mu}\vec{a}_{0}-g_{1}wz\partial^{\mu}\eta\vec{a}% _ { 0}-g_{1}\sigma\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}-g_{1}wz\sigma\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})^{2}\\ & + \,\frac{1}{2}\,(z\partial^{\mu}\eta - g_{1}\sigma f_{1}^{\mu}-g_{1}% wz\sigma\partial^{\mu}\eta - g_{1}\,\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}\cdot\vec{a}_{0}% -g_{1}wz\,\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{a}_{0})^{2}\\ & -\,\frac{1}{2}\,\left [ m_{0}^{2}-c+\left ( \lambda_{1}+\frac{\lambda_{2}% } { 2}\right ) \phi^{2}\right ] z^{2}\vec{\pi}^{2}-\frac{1}{2}\,\left [ m_{0}^{2}+c+\left ( \lambda_{1}+\frac{\lambda_{2}}{2}\right ) \phi^{2}\right ] z^{2}\eta^{2}\\ & + \,\frac{1}{2}\,[\partial^{\mu}\vec{a}_{0}+g_{1}\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\times \vec{a}_{0}+g_{1}zf_{1}^{\mu}\vec{\pi}+g_{1}wz^{2}\vec{\pi}\partial^{\mu}% \eta+g_{1}z\eta\,\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}+g_{1}wz^{2}\eta\,\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi } ] ^{2}\\ & -\,\frac{1}{2}\,\left [ m_{0}^{2}+c+\left ( \lambda_{1}+\frac{3}{2}% \lambda_{2}\right ) \phi^{2}\right ] \vec{a}_{0}^{2}-\frac{\lambda_{2}}% { 2}[(\sigma\vec{a}_{0}+z^{2}\eta\,\vec{\pi})^{2}+z^{2}\vec{a}_{0}^{2}\vec{\pi } ^{2}-z^{2}(\vec{a}_{0}\cdot\vec{\pi})^{2}]\\ & -\,\frac{1}{4}\,\left ( \lambda_{1}+\frac{\lambda_{2}}{2}\right ) \,(\sigma^{2}+\vec{a}_{0}^{2}+z^{2}\eta^{2}+z^{2}\vec{\pi}^{2})^{2}-\left ( \lambda_{1}+\frac{\lambda_{2}}{2}\right ) \,\phi\sigma\,(\sigma^{2}+\vec { a}_{0}^{2}+z^{2}\eta^{2}+z^{2}\vec{\pi}^{2})\\ & -\,\lambda_{2}\phi\vec{a}_{0}\cdot(\sigma\vec{a}_{0}+z^{2}\eta\,\vec{\pi } ) -\frac{1}{4}\,(\partial^{\mu}\omega^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu}\omega^{\mu}% ) ^{2}+\frac{m_{1}^{2}}{2}\,(\omega^{\mu})^{2}\\ & -\,\frac{1}{4}\,[\partial^{\mu}\vec{\rho}^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu}\vec{\rho } ^{\mu}+g_{2}\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\times\vec{\rho}^{\nu}+g\,_{2}\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu } \times\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu}+g_{2}wz\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\times\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu } + g_{2}wz\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}\times\partial^{\nu}\vec{\pi}\\ & + \,g_{2}w^{2}z^{2}(\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\ ) \times(\partial^{\nu}\vec{\pi } ) ] ^{2}\\ & + \,\frac{m_{1}^{2}}{2}(\vec{\rho}^{\mu})^{2}-\frac{1}{4}\,(\partial^{\mu } f_{1}^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu}f_{1}^{\mu})^{2}+\frac{m_{1}^{2}+g_{1}^{2}\phi^{2}% } { 2}\,(f_{1}^{\mu})^{2}+\frac{m_{1}^{2}+g_{1}^{2}\phi^{2}}{2}\,(\vec{a}% _ { 1}^{\mu})^{2}\\ & -\,\frac{1}{4}\,[\partial^{\mu}\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu}-\partial^{\nu}\vec{a}% _ { 1}^{\mu}+g_{2}\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\times\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu}+g_{2}wz\vec{\rho}% ^{\mu}\times\partial^{\nu}\vec{\pi}+g_{2}\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}\times\vec{\rho } ^{\nu}+g_{2}wz(\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})\times\vec{\rho}^{\nu}]^{2}\\ & -\,g_{1}^{2}\,\phi\,\vec{a}_{1\mu}\cdot\lbrack\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\times z\vec{\pi}-f_{1}^{\mu}\vec{a}_{0}-wz\vec{a}_{0}\,\partial^{\mu}\eta]\\ & -\,g_{1}^{2}wz\,\phi\,\partial_{\mu}\vec{\pi}\cdot\,[z\vec{\rho}^{\mu } \times\vec{\pi}-f_{1}^{\mu}\vec{a}_{0}-wz\partial^{\mu}\eta\,\vec{a}% _ { 0}]+g_{1}^{2}\,\phi f_{1\mu}\,(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}\cdot\vec{a}_{0}% + wz\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{a}_{0})\\ & + \,g_{1}^{2}wz\,\phi\,\partial_{\mu}\eta\,(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}\cdot\vec { a}_{0}+wz\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\cdot\vec{a}_{0})\\ & + \,g_{1}^{2}\,\phi\,\sigma\,[(f_{1}^{\mu})^{2}+2wzf_{1\,\mu}\partial^{\mu } \eta+w^{2}z^{2}(\partial^{\mu}\eta)^{2}]\\ & + \,g_{1}^{2}\,\phi\,\sigma\,[(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu})^{2}+2wz\vec{a}_{1\mu}% \cdot\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}+w^{2}z^{2}(\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})^{2}]\\ & -\,\frac{1}{2}\,\frac{g_{1}^{2}\phi^{2}}{\,m_{a_{1}}^{2}}\,z^{2}% \,(\partial_{\mu}\eta\partial^{\mu}\eta+\partial_{\mu}\vec{\pi}\cdot \partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})\\ & + ea_{\mu}\{(\vec{a}_{0}\times\partial^{\mu}\vec{a}_{0})_{3}+z^{2}(\vec{\pi } \times\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})_{3}-4(\vec{\rho}^{\mu\nu}\times\vec{\rho}% _ { \nu})_{3}-4[(\vec{a}_{1\nu}+zw\partial_{\nu}\vec{\pi})\times\vec{a}_{1}% ^{\mu\nu}]_{3}\\ & + g_{1}\{2z(f_{1}^{\mu}+zw\partial^{\mu}\eta)(\vec{a}_{0}\times\vec{\pi } ) _ { 3}+z(\sigma+\phi)[(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}+zw\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi } ) \times\vec{\pi}]_{3}\\ & + \eta\lbrack\vec{a}_{0}\times(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}+zw\partial^{\mu } \vec{\pi})]_{3}-a_{0}^{3}(a_{0}^{1}\rho^{\mu1}+a_{0}^{2}\rho^{\mu2})-z^{2}% \pi^{3}(\pi^{1}\rho^{\mu1}+\pi^{2}\rho^{\mu2})\\ & + \rho^{\mu3}[(a_{0}^{1})^{2}+(a_{0}^{2})^{2}+z^{2}(\pi^{1})^{2}+z^{2}% ( \pi^{2})^{2}]\}\\ & + 4g_{2}\{[\vec{\rho}_{\nu}^{2}+\vec{a}_{1\nu}^{2}+z^{2}w^{2}\left ( \partial_{\nu}\vec{\pi}\right)^{2}+zw\vec{a}_{1\nu}\cdot\partial^{\nu}% \vec{\pi}]\rho^{\mu3}+2\vec{\rho}_{\nu}\cdot(\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu}+zw\partial ^{\nu}\vec{\pi})\times(a_{1}^{\mu3}+zw\partial^{\mu}\pi^{3})\\ & -(\vec{\rho}_{\nu}\cdot\vec{\rho}^{\mu}+\vec{a}_{1\nu}\cdot\vec{a}_{1}% ^{\mu}+zw\vec{a}_{1\nu}\cdot\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}+zw\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}% \cdot\partial_{\nu}\vec{\pi}+z^{2}w^{2}\partial_{\nu}\vec{\pi}\cdot \partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})\rho^{\nu3}\\ & -(\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\cdot\vec{a}_{1\nu}+\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}\cdot\vec{\rho}% _ { \nu}+zw\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\cdot\partial_{\nu}\vec{\pi}+zw\vec{\rho}_{\nu}% \cdot\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})a_{1}^{\nu3}\}\}\\ & + \frac{e^{2}}{2}a_{\mu}a^{\mu}[(a_{0}^{1})^{2}+(a_{0}^{2})^{2}+z^{2}% ( \pi^{1})^{2}+z^{2}(\pi^{2})^{2}+4(\rho^{\nu1})^{2}+4(\rho^{\nu2})^{2}\\ & + 4(a_{1\nu}^{1}+zw\partial_{\nu}\pi^{1})^{2}+4(a_{1\nu}^{2}+zw\partial _ { \nu}\pi^{2})^{2}]\\ & -2e^{2}a_{\mu}a_{\nu}[\rho^{\mu1}\rho^{\nu1}+\rho^{\mu2}\rho^{\nu2}% + ( a_{1}^{\mu1}+zw\partial^{\mu}\pi^{1})(a_{1}^{\nu1}+zw\partial^{\nu}\pi ^{1})\\ & + ( a_{1}^{\mu2}+zw\partial^{\mu}\pi^{2})(a_{1}^{\nu2}+zw\partial^{\nu}% \pi^{2})]+{\mathcal{l}}_{h_{1,2,3}}+\mathcal{l}_{g_{3}}+\mathcal{l}_{4}%\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath441\\ & + 2zw(f_{1\mu}\partial^{\mu}\eta+\vec{a}_{1\mu}\cdot\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi } ) \}\\ & + \left ( \frac{h_{1}}{4}+\frac{h_{2}}{4}+\frac{h_{3}}{4}\right ) \phi ^{2}(\omega_{\mu}^{2}+\vec{\rho}_{\mu}^{2})+\left ( \frac{h_{1}}{4}% + \frac{h_{2}}{4}-\frac{h_{3}}{4}\right ) \phi^{2}(f_{1\mu}^{2}+\vec{a}_{1\mu } ^{2})\\ & + ( h_{2}+h_{3})\omega_{\mu}[(\sigma+\phi)\vec{a}_{0}+z^{2}\eta\vec{\pi } ] \cdot\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\\ & + ( h_{2}-h_{3})[(\sigma+\phi)\vec{a}_{0}+z^{2}\eta\vec{\pi}]\cdot\lbrack f_{1\mu}\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}+zw(\vec{a}_{1\mu}\partial^{\mu}\eta+f_{1\mu}% \partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})+z^{2}w^{2}(\partial_{\mu}\eta)(\partial^{\mu}\vec { \pi})]\\ & + ( h_{2}+h_{3})z(\vec{a}_{0}\times\vec{\pi})\cdot(\omega_{\mu}\vec{a}% _ { 1}^{\mu}+zw\omega_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})\\ & + ( h_{2}-h_{3})z(\vec{a}_{0}\times\vec{\pi})\cdot(f_{1\mu}\vec{\rho}^{\mu } + zw\vec{\rho}_{\mu}\partial^{\mu}\eta)\\ & + h_{3}z[\eta\vec{a}_{0}-(\sigma+\phi)\vec{\pi}]\cdot\lbrack\vec{\rho}_{\mu } \times(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}+zw\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})]\\ & -\frac{h_{3}}{2}\{(\vec{a}_{0}\times\vec{\rho}^{\mu})^{2}-[\vec{a}% _ { 0}\times(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}+zw\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})]^{2}+z^{2}(\vec{\pi } \times\vec{\rho}^{\mu})^{2}-z^{2}[\vec{\pi}\times(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu } + zw\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})]^{2}\}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath442\\ & + ( \partial_{\mu}f_{1\nu}+zw\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\eta)[\omega^{\mu } f_{1}^{\nu}+\omega^{\nu}f_{1}^{\mu}+\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\cdot\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu } + \vec{\rho}^{\nu}\cdot\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}+zw(\omega^{\mu}\partial^{\nu}% \eta+\omega^{\nu}\partial^{\mu}\eta+\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\cdot\partial^{\nu}% \vec{\pi}+\vec{\rho}^{\nu}\cdot\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})]\\ & + \partial_{\mu}\vec{\rho}_{\nu}\cdot\lbrack\omega^{\mu}\vec{\rho}^{\nu } + \omega^{\nu}\vec{\rho}^{\mu}+f_{1}^{\mu}\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu}+f_{1}^{\nu}\vec { a}_{1}^{\mu}+zw(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}\partial^{\nu}\eta+\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu}% \partial^{\mu}\eta+f_{1}^{\mu}\partial^{\nu}\vec{\pi}+f_{1}^{\nu}\partial ^{\mu}\vec{\pi})+z^{2}w^{2}(\partial^{\mu}\eta\partial^{\nu}\vec{\pi}% + \partial^{\nu}\eta\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})]\\ & + ( \partial_{\mu}\vec{a}_{1\nu}+zw\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\vec{\pi } ) \cdot\lbrack f_{1}^{\mu}\vec{\rho}^{\nu}+f_{1}^{\nu}\vec{\rho}^{\mu}% + \omega^{\mu}\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu}+\omega^{\nu}\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}+zw(\vec{\rho } ^{\mu}\partial^{\nu}\eta+\vec{\rho}^{\nu}\partial^{\mu}\eta+\omega^{\mu } \partial^{\nu}\vec{\pi}+\omega^{\nu}\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi})]\}\\ & + 4eg_{3}a_{\mu}\{\omega_{\nu}[(\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\times\vec{\rho}^{\nu}% ) _ { 3}+(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}\times\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu})_{3}+zw(\partial^{\mu}\vec { \pi}\times\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu})_{3}+zw(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}\times\partial^{\nu}% \vec{\pi})_{3}+z^{2}w^{2}(\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\times\partial^{\nu}\vec{\pi } ) _ { 3}]\\ & + ( f_{1\nu}+zw\partial_{\nu}\eta)[(\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\times\vec{a}_{1}^{\nu } ) _ { 3}+(\vec{a}_{1}^{\mu}\times\vec{\rho}^{\nu})_{3}+zw(\vec{\rho}^{\mu}% \times\partial^{\nu}\vec{\pi})_{3}+zw(\partial^{\mu}\vec{\pi}\times\vec{\rho } ^{\nu})_{3}]\}\end{aligned}\ ] ] c. amsler and f. e. close , phys . lett . b * 353 * , 385 ( 1995 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9505219 ] ; w. j. lee and d. weingarten , phys . d * 61 * , 014015 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - lat/9910008 ] ; f. e. close and a. kirk , eur . j. c * 21 * , 531 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0103173 ] ; f. giacosa , t. gutsche , v. e. lyubovitskij and a. faessler , phys . rev . d * 72 * , 094006 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0509247 ] ; f. giacosa , t. gutsche , v. e. lyubovitskij and a. faessler , phys . b * 622 * , 277 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0504033 ] . r. l. jaffe , phys . d * 15 * , 267 ( 1977 ) ; r. l. jaffe , phys . d * 15 * , 281 ( 1977 ) ; l. maiani , f. piccinini , a. d. polosa and v. riquer , phys . rev . lett . * 93 * , 212002 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0407017 ] ; a. h. fariborz , r. jora and j. schechter , phys . d * 72 * , 034001 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0506170 ] ; f. giacosa , phys . d * 74 * , 014028 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0605191 ] ; a. h. fariborz , r. jora and j. schechter , phys . d * 76 * , 114001 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv:0708.3402 [ hep - ph ] ] ; f. giacosa , phys . rev . d * 75 * , 054007 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0611388 ] ; g. t hooft , g. isidori , l. maiani , a. d. polosa and v. riquer , phys . b * 662 * , 424 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0801.2288 [ hep - ph ] ] ; t. kojo and d. jido , phys . d * 78 * , 114005 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0802.2372 [ hep - ph ] ] ; t. kojo and d. jido , arxiv:0807.2364 [ hep - ph ] . g. t hooft , nucl . b * 72 * , 461 ( 1974 ) ; e. witten , nucl . b * 160 * , 57 ( 1979 ) ; s. r. coleman , `` 1/n , '' published in erice subnuclear 1979:0011 ; r. f. lebed , czech . j. phys . * 49 * , 1273 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : nucl - th/9810080 ] . j. r. pelaez , phys . 92 * , 102001 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0309292 ] ; j. r. pelaez , aip conf . * 814 * , 670 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0510118 ] ; j. r. pelaez and g. rios , phys . lett . * 97 * , 242002 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0610397 ] . n. mathur _ et al . _ , phys . d * 76 * , 114505 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0607110 ] ; t. draper , t. doi , k. f. liu , d. mankame , n. mathur and x. f. meng , pos * lattice2008 * , 108 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0810.5512 [ hep - lat ] ] . b. bloch - devaux [ na48/2 collaboration ] , presentation at the panic08 conference , eilat ( israel ) , 9 - 14 november 2008 . f. giacosa and g. pagliara , phys . c * 76 * , 065204 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv:0707.3594 [ hep - ph ] ] . c. a. baker _ _ , phys . b * 563 * , 140 ( 2003 ) . d. v. bugg , eur . j. c * 52 * , 55 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv:0706.1341 [ hep - ex ] ] . a. abele _ et al . _ [ crystal barrel collaboration ] , eur . phys . j. c * 21 * , 261 ( 2001 ) . a. habersetzer , f. giacosa and d. h. rischke , in preparation . Abstract:
[ "we present a two - flavour linear sigma model with global chiral symmetry and vector and axial - vector mesons . we calculate @xmath0 scattering lengths and the decay widths of scalar , vector , and axial - vector mesons . it is demonstrated that vector and axial - vector meson degrees of freedom play an important role in these low - energy processes and that a reasonable theoretical description requires globally chirally invariant terms other than the vector meson mass term . an important question for meson vacuum phenomenology is the quark content of the physical scalar @xmath1 and @xmath2 mesons . we investigate this question by assigning the quark - antiquark @xmath3 and @xmath4 states of our model with these physical mesons . we show via a detailed comparison with experimental data that this scenario can describe all vacuum properties studied here except for the decay width of the @xmath3 , which turns out to be too small . we also study the alternative assignment @xmath5 and @xmath6 for the scalar mesons . in this case the decay width agrees with the experimental value , but the @xmath0 scattering length @xmath7 is too small . this indicates the necessity to extend our model by additional scalar degrees of freedom ." ]
12,644
12,644
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: quenched disorder induces an extrinsic inhomogeneity in otherwise translationally invariant pure systems . as a result , the equilibrium and out - of - equilibrium physics of disordered systems may be influenced by rare collective events , such as `` avalanches '' , statistically unlikely regions , such as `` droplets '' or `` griffiths regions '' , and by the proliferation of `` metastable states '' . our objective is to develop a theory describing the long - distance physics of such systems through a nonperturbative functional renormalization group ( np - frg ) method and our first focus is the equilibrium behavior of the random - field model . we showed in previous papers , which we refer to as i@xcite and ii@xcite , that the effect of avalanches and droplets can be captured by an approach based on the rg flow of the cumulants of the renormalized disorder , provided that the full functional dependence of the latter is accounted for.@xcite a functional rg is therefore required to let the singular behavior due to rare events or regions emerge along the flow , as also shown in the case of the equilibrium and forced behavior of manifolds in a random environment.@xcite the issue of metastable states , which , at zero temperature where the concept is well defined , refers to the presence of many minima of the microscopic hamiltonian ( bare action ) not simply related by symmetry transformations , is a recurring conundrum in theories of disordered systems . in the case of the random - field ising model ( rfim ) under study , it has a clear manifestation . the critical behavior of the model being controlled by a zero - temperature fixed point,@xcite the long - distance physics can be described through the properties of the ground state which , due to the presence of the random field , is obtained as the solution of a stochastic field equation . by standard field - theoretic manipulations , this leads to a theory expressed in terms of superfields . parisi and sourlas@xcite showed that a supersymmetry of the theory , more specifically the invariance under rotations of the underlying superspace , implies the property of dimensional reduction , according to which the critical behavior of the rfim in @xmath4 dimensions is identical to that of the pure ising model in @xmath5 dimensions . the property however has been proven to be wrong in low enough dimension.@xcite at the same time , it has been understood that the superfield construction breaks down because of the presence of many solutions of the stochastic field equation.@xcite however , in the parisi - sourlas formalism , it is not possible to disentangle breaking of superrotational invariance and collapse of the formalism due to the appearance of multiple solutions . in the companion paper , henceforth referred to as paper iii,@xcite we have shown how to resolve the above conundrum and to combine an extended superfield approach with the np - frg formalism . in particular , ground - state selection can be achieved by adding a weighting factor involving an auxiliary temperature and letting at the end of the manipulations the auxiliary temperature go to zero in the exact np - frg equations for the cumulants of the renormalized disorder . the resulting property of `` grassmannian ultralocality '' then allows one to specifically investigate supersymmetry ( superrotational invariance ) and its spontaneous breaking along the rg flow . such an investigation is the purpose of the present paper . the outline of the article is as follows . in sec . [ sec : model ] , we briefly summarize the main steps of the np - frg in a superfield formalism that we have developed in paper iii . this allows us to recall definitions , notations , and rg equations that will be used in the present article . in particular , we stress two important , and distinct , formal properties of the superfield theory : grassmannian ultralocality " and superrotational invariance " . we also consider the rg flow of the ward - takahashi identities associated with the latter and the consequences for the choice of the infrared regulator . in sec . [ sec : surot invariance ] , we show through our np - frg formalism that the superrotational invariance nonperturbatively leads to dimensional reduction . we conclude the section by building a scenario for a spontaneous breaking of the superrotational invariance along the rg flow that is based on our previous results on the appearance of a cusp " in the functional dependence of the cumulants of the renormalized random field,@xcite and we propose a continuation of the np - frg flow equations when spontaneous breaking has taken place . [ sec : approximation scheme ] is devoted to the development of a supersymmetry - compatible nonperturbative approximation scheme for the exact np - frg equations . it relies on combined truncations of the cumulant expansion and the expansion in spatial derivatives of the field . we also provide details on the numerical resolution . in sec . [ sec : results ] we present the results . we show in particular that breakdown of the dimensional reduction predictions for the critical exponents of the rfim occurs below a critical dimension @xmath0 . we compute the critical exponents as a function of dimension down to @xmath2 and we find good agreement with the best available estimates in @xmath2 and @xmath3 . finally , we show that scaling is described by three independent exponents , contrary to a proposed conjecture.@xcite a short account of this work has appeared in ref . we start by briefly recalling the main features of the formalism presented in the preceding article , with the associated definitions and notations . in paper iii,@xcite we have developed a np - frg theory for describing the equilibrium long - distance physics of the rfim that is based on an extension of the parisi - sourlas@xcite supersymmetric formalism . the latter relies on the fact that the critical behavior of the model is dominated by disorder - induced fluctuations , thermal fluctuations being subdominant , and can therefore be studied by looking directly at zero temperature . the equilibrium properties are then described by the ground state which is solution of the following stochastic field equation @xmath6}{\delta \varphi(x ) } = j(x),\ ] ] where we have added an external source ( a magnetic field ) @xmath7 conjugate to the @xmath8 field and the action @xmath9 $ ] is given by @xmath10 where @xmath11 , @xmath12 , with @xmath13 a random ( magnetic ) field sampled from a gaussian distribution of zero mean and variance @xmath14 . two key ingredients of our extension of the parisi - sourlas formalism are : \(1 ) the need to consider multiple copies ( or replicas ) of the original system with the same disorder , each copy being coupled to a different applied source , in order to generate cumulants of the renormalized disorder with their full functional dependence , thereby allowing for the emergence of a nonanalytic behavior in the field arguments , \(2 ) the introduction of a weighting factor involving an auxiliary temperature @xmath15 to the solutions of the stochastic field equation , so that when @xmath15 appraches 0 only the ground state contributes to the generating functional . by using standard field - theoretical techniques,@xcite one then ends up with a superfield theory for multiple copies in a curved superspace , with @xmath16=\exp ( \mathcal w^{(\beta)}[\{\mathcal j_a\}])=\overline{\exp(\sum_{a=1}^n\mathcal w_h^{(\beta ) } [ \mathcal j_a ] ) } \\&= \int \prod_{a=1}^{n}\mathcal q\phi_a \exp \bigg(-s^{(\beta)}[\{\phi_a\ } ] + \sum_{a=1}^{n } \int_{\underline x } \mathcal j_a(\underline x ) \phi_a(\underline x)\bigg ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the multicopy action is given by @xmath17 = \sum_{a=1}^{n } \int_{\underline{x } } \left [ \frac 12 ( \partial_{\mu}\phi_a(\underline{x}))^2+u_{b}(\phi_a(\underline{x}))\right ] \\&- \frac{\delta_b}{2}\sum_{a_1=1}^{n}\sum_{a_2=1}^{n } \int_{x}\int_{\underline{\theta}_1\underline{\theta}_2 } \phi_{a_1}(x,\underline{\theta}_1)\phi_{a_2}(x,\underline{\theta}_2 ) . \end{aligned}\ ] ] in the above equations , we have introduced a superspace ( coordinates @xmath18 ) comprising the @xmath4-dimensional euclidean space ( coordinates @xmath19 ) and a @xmath20-dimensional grassmannian space ( anticommuting coordinates @xmath21 ) ; the metric is flat in the euclidean sector and curved in the grassmannian one with the curvature proportional to @xmath22 . ( for instance , the integral over superspace is defined as @xmath23 . ) we have also defined superfields @xmath24 , with one auxiliary bosonic ( response " ) field @xmath25 and two auxiliary fermionic ( ghost " ) fields @xmath26 and @xmath27 , and associated supersources @xmath28 . the action in eq . ( [ eq_superaction_multicopy ] ) is invariant under a large group of ( bosonic and fermionic ) symmetries . when expanded in increasing number of sums over copies , the generating functional of the connected green s functions , @xmath29 $ ] , gives access to the cumulants of the random generating functional @xmath30 $ ] . we have next applied the np - frg formalism to this superfield theory . this proceeds by first adding an infrared ( ir ) regulator that enforces a progressive account of the fluctuations to the bare action , @xmath31 where the two cutoff functions @xmath32 and @xmath33 are related through @xmath34 with @xmath35 the euclidean momentum , @xmath36 the strength of the renormalized random field , and @xmath37 the field renormalization constant . this ensures that all symmetries of the theory are satisfied . this includes the superrotational invariance found when the theory is restricted to a single copy and to @xmath38 : it then corresponds to @xmath39 , a property that is valid at the microscopic ( uv ) scale @xmath40 ( see also below ) . one next introduces the effective average action@xcite @xmath41=-\mathcal w_k^{(\beta)}[\{\mathcal j_a\}]+\sum_a\int_{\underline x } \phi_a(\underline x ) \mathcal j_a(\underline x ) -\delta s_k^{(\beta)}[\{\phi_a\}]$ ] , whose dependence on the ir cutoff @xmath42 is governed by an exact renormalization - group equation ( erge ) . the effective average action can also be expanded in increasing number of sums over copies , each term of the expansion being then related through the legendre transform to the cumulants of @xmath30 $ ] . we refer to the @xmath43th order term of the expansion of @xmath41 $ ] as the @xmath43th `` cumulant of the renormalized disorder '' . these expansions in increasing number of sums over copies lead to systematic algebraic manipulations that allow one to derive from the erge for @xmath41 $ ] a hierarchy of coupled erge s for the cumulants of the renormalized disorder . we have unveiled an important property of the random generating functional @xmath30 $ ] : the latter satisfies a specific dependence on the grassmann coordinates , which we have called grassmannian ultralocality " , if and only if a unique solution of the stochastic field equation is included in its computation . this translates into an ultralocal " property of the cumulants of the renormalized disorder . grassmannian ultralocality `` becomes a property of the superfield theory when @xmath44 ; it is also asymptotically found for finite @xmath22 when @xmath45 ( after going to dimensionless quantities ) . it then reflects the desired ground - state dominance . when this property is satisfied ( _ e.g. _ by setting @xmath46 ) , the erge s for the cumulants simplify and only involve ultralocal '' quantities that can be evaluated for physical fields @xmath47 , _ i.e. _ for superfields that are uniform in the grassmann subspace . for illustration , we give below the erge s for the first two cumulants under the property of grassmannian ultralocality " , which will be needed in the following : @xmath48= \\&- \dfrac{1}{2 } \tilde{\partial}_t \int_{x_2x_3}\widehat{p}_{k;x_2x_3}[\phi_1 ] \big(\gamma_{k2;x_2,x_3}^{(11)}\left[\phi_1,\phi_1\right ] - \widetilde{r}_{k;x_2x_3}\big ) \end{split}\ ] ] and @xmath49=\\ & \dfrac{1}{2 } \tilde{\partial}_t \int_{x_3x_4}\big \{- \widehat{p}_{k;x_3x_4}\left[\phi_1\right ] \gamma_{k3;x_3,.,x_4}^{(101)}\left[\phi_1,\phi_2,\phi_1\right ] + \\ & \widetilde{p}_{k;x_3x_4}\left[\phi_1,\phi_1\right ] \gamma_{k2;x_3x_4,.}^{(20)}\left[\phi_1,\phi_2\right ] + \frac{1}{2}\widetilde{p}_{k;x_3x_4}\left[\phi_1,\phi_2\right ] \\ & \times \left ( \gamma_{k2;x_3,x_4}^{(11)}\left[\phi_1,\phi_2\right ] - \widetilde{r}_{k;x_3x_4}\right ) + perm(12)\big \ } , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath50 denotes the expression obtained by permuting @xmath51 and @xmath52 , @xmath53 , @xmath54 is a short - hand notation to indicate a derivative acting only on the cutoff functions ( _ i.e. _ , @xmath55 ) , and the propagators @xmath56 and @xmath57 ( denoted by @xmath58}$ ] and @xmath59}$ ] in paper iii@xcite ) are defined as @xmath60=\left(\gamma _ { k,1}^{(2 ) } [ \phi ] + \widehat r_k\right ) ^{-1}\ ] ] and @xmath61= \widehat { p}_{k } [ \phi_1 ] ( \gamma _ { k,2}^{(11)}[\phi_1 , \phi_2 ] -\widetilde r_k ) \widehat { p}_{k } [ \phi_2 ] , \ ] ] and superscripts indicate functional differentiation with respect to the field arguments . generically , the flow of @xmath62 $ ] involves three types of quantities : the propagators @xmath56 and @xmath57 , second functional derivatives of @xmath63 in which all the arguments are different , and second functional derivatives of @xmath64 with two of their arguments equal to each other . a graphical representation of the hierarchy of erge s is provided is appendix c of the companion paper iii . in the present paper we will focus on these flow equations , which correspond to the @xmath44 limit and describe the equilibrium properties associated with the ground state ( recall that the `` bath '' temperature is also at @xmath65 ) . we will briefly comment on the rg flow of corrections to grassmannian ultralocality " when @xmath22 is large but finite . finally , it is worth stressing that to obtain the flow equation for @xmath66 $ ] with its full functional dependence on the @xmath43 field arguments , one needs to consider at least @xmath43 copies . if one considers less than @xmath43 copies , the equation necessarily involves @xmath63 and its derivatives in which several of the arguments are equal . as we will show later , breaking of supersymmetry and breakdown of dimensional reduction are precisely related to the analyticity properties of the functionals when taking the limit of equal arguments . formally , the whole hierarchy of flow equations for the cumulants can thus be obtained by considering an arbitrary large number of copies . when grassmannian ultralocality " is satisfied , the curvature @xmath22 disappears from the flow equations [ see eqs . ( [ eq_flow_gamma1_ulapp],[eq_flow_gamma2_ulapp ] ) ] . formally , the latter are then the same as those obtained from considering a flat grassmann subspace . we have shown in paper iii that in this case , and provided one restricts the supersources such that one effectively recovers a one - copy theory , the theory is invariant under superrotations " that mix the euclidean and grassmannian sectors of the superspace . the associated generators are @xmath67 and @xmath68 . as any linearly realized continuous symmetry , superrotational invariance leads to a set of ward - takahashi ( wt ) identities for the one - particle irreducible ( 1pi ) generating functional , _ i.e. _ at scale @xmath42 the effective average action . for a flat superspace and a restriction to one copy , the wt identity for the effective average action reads @xmath69=0\ ] ] and similarly with @xmath70 . one can now check that the above wt identities are _ a priori _ stable under the rg flow , _ i.e. _ @xmath71=0,\ ] ] where @xmath72 generically indicates a component @xmath73 and , since there is no curvature , @xmath74 . to prove eq . ( [ eq_flow_ward ] ) , we rewrite the erge for the effective average action when the superfield theory is restricted to one copy and is considered in a flat superspace ( @xmath38 ) : @xmath75=\frac 12 \int_{\underline{x}_1\,\underline{x}_2 } \left ( \partial_t \mathcal r_{k;\underline x_1,\underline x_2}\right ) \mathcal p_{k;\underline x_1,\underline x_2}[\left\lbrace \phi_a \right\rbrace ] , \ ] ] where the regulator function @xmath76 with @xmath77 and the modified ( full ) propagator @xmath78 is the inverse in the sense of operators of @xmath79 . ( inserting the `` multilocal '' expansion in the grassmann coordinates and using the assumption of grassmannian ultralocality " then leads to erge s for the cumulants which are just eqs . ( [ eq_flow_gamma1_ulapp],[eq_flow_gamma2_ulapp ] ) and their extension to higher orders with all copy superfields taken as equal in both sides of the equations . ) the flow of the left - hand side of eq . ( [ eq_flow_ward ] ) can then be expressed as @xmath80\\ & = \frac{1}{2}\tilde{\partial}_t \int_{\underline{x}_1\,\underline{x}_2\ , \underline{x}_3}\phi(\underline{x}_1)\mathcal q_{\underline{x}_1 } \left ( \mathcal p_{k;\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_3}[\phi]\gamma_{k;\underline{x}_3\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_1}^{(3)}[\phi]\right ) \\ & = \frac{1}{2}\tilde{\partial}_t \int_{\underline{x}_2\,\underline{x}_3}\mathcal p_{k;\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_3}[\phi ] \int_{\underline{x}_1}\phi(\underline{x}_1)\mathcal q_{\underline{x}_1 } \gamma_{k;\underline{x}_3\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_1}^{(3)}[\phi ] , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used that @xmath81 does not act on @xmath82 . assuming that the wt identity , eq . ( [ eq_ward_k ] ) , is satisfied down to the scale @xmath42 ( we study its further evolution ) , one has @xmath83= - \left ( \mathcal q_{\underline{x}_2 } + \mathcal q_{\underline{x}_3}\right ) \gamma_{k;\underline{x}_3\underline{x}_2}^{(2)}[\phi ] , \end{aligned}\ ] ] which is obtained by differentiating twice eq . ( [ eq_ward_k ] ) . after an integration by parts and a relabel of the dummy variables @xmath84 , one then finds @xmath85\\&= -\frac{1}{2}\tilde{\partial}_t \int_{\underline{x}_2\,\underline{x}_3}\gamma_{k;\underline{x}_3\underline{x}_2}^{(2)}[\phi]\ ; \left(\mathcal q_{\underline{x}_2 } + \mathcal q_{\underline{x}_3}\right ) \mathcal p_{k;\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_3}[\phi ] . \end{aligned}\ ] ] provided that one chooses the infrared cutoff function such that @xmath86 one can replace @xmath87 $ ] by @xmath87 + \mathcal r_{k;\underline{x}_3\underline{x}_2}$ ] in eq . ( [ eq_dem_susy_dr ] ) . by using the fact that the latter is equal to the inverse modified propagator @xmath88)_{\underline{x}_3\underline{x}_2}$ ] , one can rewrite the right - hand side of eq . ( [ eq_dem_susy_dr ] ) ( up to the trivial factor of @xmath89 ) as @xmath90)_{\underline{x}_3\underline{x}_2}\ ; \mathcal q_{\underline{x}_2 } \mathcal p_{k;\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_3}[\phi]\\&=\tilde{\partial}_t \int_{\underline{x}_2\,\underline{x}_4}\delta_{\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_4}\int_{\underline{x}_3}(\mathcal p_{k}^{-1}[\phi])_{\underline{x}_3\underline{x}_4}\ ; \mathcal q_{\underline{x}_2 } \mathcal p_{k;\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_3}[\phi]\\&=\tilde{\partial}_t \int_{\underline{x}_2\,\underline{x}_4}\delta_{\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_4 } \mathcal q_{\underline{x}_2}\ ; \int_{\underline{x}_3}(\mathcal p_{k}^{-1}[\phi])_{\underline{x}_3\underline{x}_4 } \mathcal p_{k;\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_3}[\phi]\\&=\tilde{\partial}_t \int_{\underline{x}_2\,\underline{x}_4}\delta_{\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_4 } \mathcal q_{\underline{x}_2}\ ; \delta_{\underline{x}_2\underline{x}_4}. \end{aligned}\ ] ] this last expression is easily shown to be identically zero , so that one finally obtains that eq . ( [ eq_flow_ward ] ) is satisfied at scale @xmath42 . the same reasoning can be repeated with the identity associated with @xmath91 . therefore , if one starts with an initial condition that is superrotationally invariant , which can be enforced by suppressing fluctuations ( see section ii - a and paper iii ) , the above derivation proves that the wt identities associated with the superrotational invariance are _ a priori _ preserved along the rg flow if the regulator satisfies eq . ( [ eq_condition_cutoff ] ) . the latter condition can be reexpressed as @xmath92=0 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used the fact that @xmath93 and @xmath94 are translationally invariant functions of the euclidean coordinates , with therefore @xmath95 and similarly for @xmath94 . going to fourier space , this implies that @xmath93 and @xmath94 are related through @xmath96 which , as already stated , corresponds to eq . ( [ eq_cutoffs_relation ] ) with @xmath39 , a condition that we choose to enforce at the beginning of the flow when @xmath97 . such a choice of cutoff then avoids an _ explicit _ breaking of superrotational invariance . an important property of the theory is that the superrotational invariance ( which for simplicity will often be denoted by the acronym susy , for supersymmetry , in the following ) leads to dimensional reduction . we consider here the case where grassmannian ultralocality " is satisfied so that the curvature @xmath22 drops out of the flow equations as in eqs . ( [ eq_flow_gamma1_ulapp],[eq_flow_gamma2_ulapp ] ) , and we assume that susy is indeed obeyed when the theory is restricted to one copy ( see above ) . we showed in paper iii@xcite that susy implies nontrivial wt identities relating cumulants of different orders . more specifically , the following wt identity at the scale @xmath42 will be needed below : @xmath98 & - \frac{\delta_b}{2 } ( x_1^\mu - x_2^\mu)\gamma_{k1;x_1x_2}^{(2)}[\phi ] = \\&- \int_{x_3}\phi(x_3 ) \partial_{3\mu}\gamma_{k2;x_1x_3,x_2}^{(21)}[\phi,\phi ] . \end{aligned}\ ] ] to prove the dimensional reduction property , it is then useful to single out a @xmath20-dimensional subspace of the @xmath4-dimensional euclidean space . we define @xmath99 with @xmath100 and @xmath101 and we consider superfields that are uniform in the 2-dimensional grassmannian and the 2-dimensional euclidean subspaces , _ i.e. _ @xmath102 . for such fields , the wt identity in eq . ( [ eq_wt_susy ] ) implies that @xmath103 = \delta_b\ , \partial_{p^2}\gamma_{k1;y_1y_2}^{(2)}[p^2;\phi],\ ] ] where @xmath43 is the @xmath20-dimensional momentum obtained from a spatial fourier transform over @xmath104 [ by using translational invariance we have as usual defined @xmath105 and similarly for @xmath106 . the same type of relation holds between @xmath107 and @xmath108 . with the help of the above relations , the erge for the first cumulant @xmath109 $ ] , eq . ( [ eq_flow_gamma1_ulapp ] ) , can be reexpressed as @xmath110&=- \big(\frac{\delta_b}{2 } \big ) \tilde \partial_t \int d^{d-2}y_1 \int d^{d-2}y_2 \int \frac{d^{2}p}{(2\pi)^2}\\&\times \widehat{p}_{k;y_1y_2}[p^2 , \phi]\ ; \partial_{p^2}\left ( \gamma_{k1;y_1y_2}^{(2)}[p^2,\phi ] + \widehat{r}_k(p^2)\right ) \\&= - \big(\frac{\delta_b}{2 } \big ) \tilde \partial_t \int d^{d-2}y_1 \int \frac{d(p^2)}{4\pi}\\&\times \partial_{p^2}\left [ \log \left ( \gamma_{k1}^{(2)}[p^2,\phi ] + \widehat{r}_k(p^2)\right)\right ] _ { y_1y_1 } , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where , in the last expression , @xmath111 and @xmath32 are functions of @xmath112 but operators in the @xmath113-dimensional euclidean space spanned by the coordinate @xmath114 ( since @xmath115 is _ not _ uniform ) . the integral over @xmath112 is easily performed . choosing an infrared cutoff function that becomes independent of @xmath42 when its argument @xmath112 is at the uv scale , it only remains : @xmath116=&\big(\frac{\delta_b}{4\pi } \big ) \frac 12 \tilde{\partial}_t \int d^{d-2}y \\&\times \big [ \log\left ( \gamma_{k1}^{(2)}[p^2=0,\phi ] + \widehat{r}_k(p^2=0)\right)\big ] _ { yy}. \end{aligned}\ ] ] up to the trivial factor @xmath117 and with the identifications @xmath118\equiv \gamma_{k}[\phi ] , \gamma_{k1}^{(2)}[p^2=0,\phi]\equiv \gamma_{k}^{(2)}[\phi ] , \widehat{r}_k(p^2=0)\equiv r_k,\ ] ] eq . ( [ eq_dim_red ] ) coincides with the erge for the effective average action of a standard scalar @xmath119 theory@xcite in dimension @xmath5 . this provides another nonperturbative demonstration@xcite of the property of dimensional reduction for supersymmetric scalar field theories , first put forward by parisi and sourlas.@xcite we have shown within a nonperturbative implementation of the rg that the supersymmetry of the theory , and more specifically the superrotational invariance for one copy ( susy ) , imply the property of dimensional reduction . as one knows that dimensional reduction does not hold in low enough dimension , what then goes wrong in the formalism ? the answer is that some ( super)symmetries or identities must be spontaneously broken along the rg flow . we make the assumption , which will be supported by actual calculations , that only the superrotational invariance ( for the theory restricted to a single copy ) may be broken along the rg flow , all other ( super)symmetries and properties , most significantly the `` grassmannian ultralocality '' encoding ground - state dominance ( when @xmath44 ) , remaining unaltered . from the above proof , it follows that failure of dimensional reduction implies that the wt identity between @xmath120 and @xmath111 breaks down : a singularity must occur along the flow , which invalidates the wt identity ; the equality in eq . ( [ eq_flow_ward ] ) and some step in its derivation must go wrong at some scale @xmath42 . from our previous work,@xcite we anticipate that this arises due to the appearance of a strong enough nonanalytic dependence of the second cumulant of the renormalized random field @xmath121 $ ] in its field arguments when the latter two , @xmath51 and @xmath52 , become equal . ( one should keep in mind that the cumulants are invariant under permutations of their arguments ; consequently , @xmath120 is an even function(al ) in @xmath122 . ) as a result , some higher - order derivative ( _ i.e. _ , a 1pi vertex deriving from @xmath120 ) blows up and the whole hierarchy of coupled erge s and wt identities for one copy ceases to be valid . in order to envisage the possible scenario for spontaneous susy breaking and breakdown of dimensional reduction , it is instructive to study the structure of the exact hierarchy of coupled rg flow equations , whose lowest - order examples are given in eqs . ( [ eq_flow_gamma1_ulapp],[eq_flow_gamma2_ulapp ] ) . the following exposition is not meant to be rigorous , but only to provide some heuristic arguments . consider first the hierarchy of erge s for the proper vertices evaluated for uniform fields ( in euclidean space ) that is obtained by repeated functional differentiation of the erge for the effective average action . for this part of the reasoning , the case of a simple scalar field theory is sufficiently illustrative . the erge for the effective average action then reads @xmath123=\frac{1}{2}\int_q \partial_t r_k(q^2 ) \left(\gamma_k^{(2)}[\phi]+r_k \right)_{q ,- q}^{-1}.\ ] ] after differentiating this equation @xmath124 times , it is easily realized that for @xmath125 the erge for any generic 1pi vertex @xmath126 depends on all lower - order proper vertices ( of order @xmath127 ) as well as on some @xmath128 s and @xmath129 s . two cases then arise : when @xmath130 , the flow equation is _ linear _ in @xmath126 itself , whereas in the other case when @xmath131 , the flow equation may be _ nonlinear _ in @xmath126 itself . the same structure applies to the present theory . a consequence is that , if no other 1pi vertices diverge first , @xmath126 can only diverge at the end of the flow ( @xmath45 ) when @xmath130 ( due to the linearity of the corresponding erge ) whereas a divergence may occur at a finite scale when @xmath132 . to get more insight , we have to look more thoroughly into the structure of the rg equations and consider the 1pi vertices associated with the cumulants separately [ see eqs . ( [ eq_flow_gamma1_ulapp],[eq_flow_gamma2_ulapp ] ) for illustration ] . we further make the following plausible assumptions ( in order to have a renormalizable theory ) : \(i ) the @xmath133-copy 1pi vertices @xmath134 always stay finite , as do the cumulants of the renormalized random field @xmath135 and their first - order derivatives . the latter may however be discontinuous ; the condition on the first derivatives amounts to assuming that no `` supercusp''@xcite stronger than linear appears in the cumulants when two arguments become equal . \(ii ) since we expect a nonanalytic behavior occuring as the copy fields become equal in the reduction to an effective @xmath133-copy system , we also anticipate that derivatives with respect to symmetric combinations of the field arguments are always bounded ( _ e.g. _ , @xmath136 \vert_{\phi } \vert < + \infty$ ] , where the derivative is evaluated for all replica fields equal to @xmath137 ) . a `` cusp''@xcite in @xmath135 with @xmath138 implies that one of its second derivatives , which means a proper vertex of order at least @xmath139 , blows up . similarly , for having a `` subcusp''@xcite in @xmath120 , at least one of its third derivatives , hence a proper vertex of order at least @xmath139 , should blow up . as we have seen above that the associated flow equations are linear , we conclude that the divergence of such proper vertices ( with @xmath130 ) can not be the triggering event for a singularity at a finite scale . on the other hand , due to the nonlinearity of the erge s for the second derivatives of @xmath120 , a `` cusp '' may appear in the latter at a finite scale . to summarize this discussion : one expects that breakdown of dimensional reduction requires the presence of a _ cusp _ in the field dependence of @xmath120 , cusp that should appear _ at a finite scale _ , which by analogy with what occurs for a manifold in a random environment@xcite we call the `` larkin '' scale , during the rg flow . by contrast , weaker nonanalyticities in @xmath120 as well as nonanalyticities in higher - order cumulants ( if no cusp has appeared in @xmath120 ) can only appear at the fixed point , in the limit @xmath140 , thereby preserving the dimensional - reduction property . indeed , the derivation leading to eq . ( [ eq_dim_red ] ) then remains valid . another nontrivial question is then raised : if superrotational invariance ( susy ) is spontaneously broken , _ how can one continue the rg flow for the effective average action ? _ the answer , which again should be verified in calculations , is as follows : \(i ) keeping in mind that superrotational invariance is explicitly broken in the presence of multiple copies ( see section [ sec : model ] ) and that it is only recovered in the process of reducing the whole problem to a single - copy system , spontaneous breaking may then be described by rejecting any implicit assumption of analyticity of the field dependences in the latter process . one should therefore restrict the hierarchy of erge s to those equations for cumulants that are considered for generic ( nonequal ) field arguments , so that a putative nonanalytic dependence in these arguments can freely emerge along the rg flow.@xcite \(ii ) one assumes that except for the superrotational invariance , all of the properties and symmetries of the effective average action @xmath141 remain valid . in particular , this applies to the property of grassmannian ultralocality " of the random generating functional and to its consequences for the cumulants of the renormalized disorder . as discussed in the preceding paper , this property is obeyed when taking the limit @xmath46 in the erge s for the cumulants , which leads to eqs . ( [ eq_flow_gamma1_ulapp],[eq_flow_gamma2_ulapp ] ) and their extensions to higher orders . it keeps track of the fact that only the ground state is considered for each copy . the validity of the property of grassmannian ultralocality " is therefore distinct from that of superrotational invariance , a distinction that can not be made in the original parisi - sourlas formalism . \(iii ) the cutoff functions satisfy the relation in eq . ( [ eq_cutoffs_relation ] ) which contains as a special case the explicit superrotational invariance when @xmath39 . in practice , the typical strength of the renormalized random field @xmath36 is defined from @xmath142 evaluated for some specific uniform field configuration and the field renormalization constant @xmath37 is obtained from @xmath143 also evaluated for some uniform field configuration . finally , the cusp in @xmath144 , which is associated with spontaneous susy breaking , must be stable upon further evolution with the infrared scale @xmath42 and must not generate `` supercusps '' . from the structure of the erge for @xmath144 , it is expected that a `` linear cusp''@xcite satisfies these requirements and provides a mechanism for dimensional reduction _ if _ it persists at the fixed point ( see appendix [ appendixa ] ) . up to this point , many of the previous considerations remain plausible conjectures . we now provide an implementation of the np - frg that allows us to check their validity . the hierachy of erge s of course can not be solved exactly and the next step is to provide a susy - compatible nonperturbative approximation scheme . from our previous work,@xcite we know that an efficient scheme relies on a joint truncation in the _ derivative expansion _ , which approximates the long - distance behavior of the 1pi vertices,@xcite and in the _ expansion in cumulants of the renormalized disorder_. the truncations however must be combined in a way that does not explicitly break the supersymmetry , more precisely the superrotational invariance ( susy ) . to implement this requirement , we use the wt identities . as is clear from the discussion in the preceding section , a minimal truncation must at least include the second renormalized cumulant . when susy is not broken , the wt identity [ see eq . ( [ eq_wt_susy_vertex ] ) ] imposes that for a uniform field @xmath145 is given by the derivative of @xmath146 with respect to @xmath147 . ( a similar relation is satisfied by the infrared cutoff functions . ) consider now the derivative expansion . in the lowest order ( lpa for `` local potential approximation '' ) , the derivative of @xmath111 is a field - independent constant , which would force @xmath120 to be also field independent : this is clearly too crude to describe the physics of the rfim . the first order of the derivative expansion leads to @xmath146 of the form @xmath148 , with @xmath149 the `` effective average potential '' ( `` gibbs free energy '' for a magnetic system ) and @xmath150 a field renormalization function . when the wt identity is satisfied , this in turn requires that @xmath151 which corresponds to a local approximation for the second cumulant . it is easy to generalize this reasoning by taking into account the whole set of wt identities for the proper vertices obtained from the cumulants : a susy - compatible approximation at order @xmath152 consists of taking @xmath153 at the order @xmath152 of the derivative expansion , @xmath154 at the order @xmath155 of the derivative expansion , ... , @xmath156 in the local approximation , and all higher - order cumulants equal to zero.@xcite this provides a scheme of successive approximations that in principle can be used to check the robustness of the results and if necessary improve them . the minimal truncation that can already describe the long - distance physics of the rfim and does not explicitly break susy is then the following : @xmath157=\int_{x}\left [ u_k(\phi(x))+\frac{1}{2}z_k(\phi(x))(\partial_{\mu}\phi(x))^2 \right ] , \end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath158=\int_{x}v_k(\phi_1(x),\phi_2(x)),\ ] ] with the higher - order cumulants set to zero.@xcite inserted in the erge s for the cumulants , eqs . ( [ eq_flow_gamma1_ulapp ] ) and ( [ eq_flow_gamma2_ulapp ] ) , the above ansatz provides @xmath159 coupled flow equations for the @xmath133-copy effective average potential @xmath149 ( or its derivative ) that describes the thermodynamics of the system , the field renormalization function @xmath150 , and the @xmath20-copy effective average potential @xmath160 from which one obtains the second cumulant of the renormalized random field at zero momentum , @xmath161 . susy is obeyed when @xmath162 , which is easily satisfied at the uv scale @xmath97 . in order to search for the fixed point that controls the critical behavior , the flow equations must be recast in a scaled form . this can be done by introducing appropriate scaling dimensions ( see refs . [ ] and paper iii@xcite ) . near a zero - temperature fixed point,@xcite one has the following scaling dimensions : @xmath163 and a renormalized temperature is introduced as @xmath164 , with @xmath165 and @xmath166 related through @xmath167 . more precisely , we define running anomalous dimensions @xmath168 and @xmath169 as @xmath170 @xmath171 where @xmath172 and @xmath36 have been introduced in sec . one also has @xmath173 the dimensionless counterparts of @xmath174 will be denoted by lower - case letters , @xmath175 . the resulting equations are @xmath176 \big [ z_{k}(\varphi ) -\delta_{k,0}(\varphi)\big ] + l_1^{(d)}(\varphi)\big[-\frac{d}{2 } z_k'(\varphi ) + \delta_{k,0}'(\varphi)\big]\\&+\frac{1}{2}(\eta_k-\bar\eta_k)\big[z_k'(\varphi)j_2^{(1,d+2)}(\varphi)+u'''_k(\varphi)j_2^{(1,d)}(\varphi)\big ] \big\ } , \end{split}\ ] ] @xmath177 + 4 l_{3}^{(d)}(\varphi ) z_{k}'(\varphi ) u'''_k(\varphi)[z_{k}(\varphi ) \\&- \delta_{k,0}(\varphi ) ] - l_{2}^{(d)}(\varphi ) \big[\frac{2d+1}{2 } z_{k}'(\varphi)^2 + z_{k}''(\varphi)(z_{k}(\varphi ) - \delta_{k,0}(\varphi ) ) \\ & - 2 z_{k}'(\varphi ) \delta_{k,0}'(\varphi)\big ] + m_{4}^{(d-2)}(\varphi)u'''_k(\varphi)^2 + \frac{2}{d}m_{4}^{(d)}(\varphi ) u'''_k(\varphi)\times \\&[(d+2)z_{k}'(\varphi)- 2 \delta_{k,0}'(\varphi ) ] + \frac{1}{d}m_{4}^{(d+2)}(\varphi)z'_k(\varphi)[(d+4)z_{k}'(\varphi)- \\ & 4 \delta_{k,0}'(\varphi ) ] - \frac{8}{d}[m_{5}^{(d+4)}(\varphi ) z'_k(\varphi)^2 + 2 m_{5}^{(d+2)}(\varphi ) z'_k(\varphi)u'''_k(\varphi ) + \\ & m_{5}^{(d)}(\varphi ) u'''_k(\varphi)^2][z_{k}(\varphi ) - \delta_{k,0}(\varphi ) ] -\frac{1}{2}(\eta_k-\bar\eta_k)\big[z_k''(\varphi)\times\\&j_2^{(1,d)}(\varphi)-(4+\frac 2d)z_k'(\varphi)^2j_3^{(1,d+2)}(\varphi)-4z_k'(\varphi)u'''_k(\varphi)\times\\ & j_3^{(1,d)}(\varphi)+\frac 2dz_k'(\varphi)^2h_4^{(d+2)}(\varphi)+\frac 4dz_k'(\varphi)u'''_k(\varphi)h_4^{(d)}(\varphi)+\\ & \frac 2d u'''_k(\varphi)^2h_4^{(d-2)}(\varphi)\big ] \big\ } , \end{split}\ ] ] @xmath178 ^ 2 + l_{2}^{(d)}(\varphi_1)v_k^{(20)}(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)\\ & \times [ \delta_{k,0}(\varphi_1)-z_k(\varphi_1 ) ] + \frac{d-2}{2 } l_{1}^{(d-2)}(\varphi_1)v_k^{(20)}(\varphi_1,\varphi_2 ) + \\ & \frac{1}{2 } m_{1,1}^{(d-2)}(\varphi_1,\varphi_2 ) - n_{1,1}^{(d-2)}(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)[\delta_k(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)-z_k(\varphi_1 ) ] \\ & -\frac{1}{2}(\eta_k-\bar\eta_k ) \big[\delta_k(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)j_{1,1}^{(1,d)}(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)+j_{1,1}^{(2,d)}(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)\\&+v_k^{(20)}(\varphi_1,\varphi_2)j_{2}^{(1,d)}(\varphi_1)\big ] + perm(12 ) \big\ } , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath179 , a prime denotes a derivative with respect to the field ( when only one argument is present ) , @xmath180 , @xmath181 , and @xmath182 denotes the terms obtained by permuting @xmath183 and @xmath184 . the functions @xmath185 , @xmath186 , @xmath187 , @xmath188 , @xmath189 , @xmath190 , @xmath191 and @xmath192 appearing in the above flow equations are `` dimensionless threshold functions '' which are defined from the infrared cutoff functions that satisfy@xcite @xmath193 and @xmath194 with the prime again denoting a derivative . the dependence of the dimensionless threshold functions on the dimensionless fields comes through @xmath195 and @xmath196 . their definitions are given in appendix [ appendixb ] . the properties of these threshold functions have been extensively discussed.@xcite they decay rapidly when their arguments @xmath197 become large , which , since @xmath198 is the square of a renormalized mass , ensures that only modes with a mass smaller than @xmath42 contribute to the flow in eqs . ( [ eq_u_ising]-[eq_v_ising ] ) . these threshold functions essentially encode the nonperturbative effects beyond the standard one - loop approximation.@xcite note that @xmath199 and @xmath196 are even functions of @xmath8 and that , due to the @xmath200 symmetry and the permutational symmetry of the cumulants in their field arguments , @xmath201 satisfies @xmath202 , and similarly for @xmath203 . finally , the initial conditions for eqs . ( [ eq_eta_z],[eq_etabar_delta],[eq_u_ising],[eq_z_ising],[eq_v_ising ] ) at the uv scale @xmath40 ( @xmath204 ) are obtained from the bare action in eq . ( [ eq_superaction_multicopy ] ) for @xmath38 and @xmath205 , _ i.e. _ , @xmath206 the last equality being valid in the ( relevant ) region where the bare potential has a nontrivial minimum;@xcite after a trivial rescaling of the fields so that the explicit dependence on @xmath207 disappears , one also has @xmath208 which implies @xmath209 . this initial condition trivially satisfies @xmath210 which ensures that invariance under superrotations is obeyed at the beginning of the flow . an important property of the present theory occurs in the limit @xmath211 when @xmath203 is regular enough . for convenience , we introduce the variables @xmath212 and @xmath213 . the property can be stated as follows : if the behavior of @xmath214 is regular enough when @xmath215 , _ i.e. _ , is such that @xmath216 with @xmath217 when @xmath215 , then the flow of @xmath218 coincides with that of @xmath196 . this is precisely the wt relation in eq . ( [ eq_wt_susy_vertex ] ) when evaluated at zero momentum ; indeed , in dimensionless form , this equation is just @xmath219 . within the present ansatz for the effective average action , dimensional reduction then follows . to prove the equality of the two flow equations , we first derive eq . ( [ eq_v_ising ] ) with respect to @xmath183 and @xmath184 to obtain the rg equation for @xmath214 , change variables to @xmath220 and take the limit @xmath221 by assuming the above small @xmath114 behavior [ eq . ( [ eq_deltak_small_y ] ) ] . the derivation makes use of the properties of the dimensionless threhold functions that are summarized in appendix [ appendixb ] . this leads to @xmath222 \\ & - \frac{2d-3}{2 } l_{2}^{(d)}(\varphi ) \delta_{k,0}'(\varphi)^2 + m_{4}^{(d-2)}(\varphi)u'''_k(\varphi)^2 + 2 m_{4}^{(d)}(\varphi ) \times \\&u'''_k(\varphi)\delta_{k,0}'(\varphi ) + m_{4}^{(d+2)}(\varphi)\delta_{k,0}'(\varphi)^2 + l_k[\varphi;\delta_{k,0}-z_k]\big\ } , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath223 $ ] is a polynomial of degree two in @xmath224 $ ] and its derivatives , with coefficients that are function of @xmath8 and such that @xmath225\equiv 0 $ ] . subtracting from the above flow equation the one for @xmath226 in eq . ( [ eq_z_ising ] ) leads to an equation for the difference @xmath227 in the form @xmath228 = m_k[\varphi ; \delta_{k,0}-z_k ] - ( \bar\eta_k-\eta_k ) z_k(\varphi),\ ] ] where @xmath229 $ ] is another polynomial of degree two in @xmath224 $ ] and its derivatives such that @xmath230\equiv 0 $ ] . [ note that due to their definitions , @xmath231 and @xmath168 are equal as soon as @xmath219 . ] since the initial condition satisfies @xmath232 and @xmath233 , the only solution to eq . ( [ eq_diff_ising ] ) is @xmath234 at all scales , which provides the desired demonstration . by inserting this result in eq . ( [ eq_u_ising ] ) , one obtains @xmath235 which coincides with the flow equation for @xmath236 in the @xmath237 theory without random field in dimension @xmath5 ( use the relation @xmath238 and compare with eq . ( 4.33 ) of ref . [ ] ) . the same exercise can be repeated for the flow of @xmath196 , thereby completing the proof of dimensional reduction in this nonperturbative approximation . on the other hand , a spontaneous breaking of susy and of the associated wt identity occurs whenever @xmath239 diverges and @xmath214 has a cusp - like singularity in the form @xmath240 as @xmath241 . we expect that such a cusp appears at a finite `` larkin '' scale @xmath242 through the formation of a boundary layer as @xmath243 and @xmath215 in the form @xmath244^{2\varpi } + y^2},\ ] ] with @xmath245 an ( _ a priori _ unknown ) exponent , as can be checked by inserting in the flow equations . the boundary layer provides the appropriate initial conditions to further continue the flow below @xmath242 with a cuspy function . finally , it is worth comparing the above np - frg equations with those we have previously derived without the superfield formalism@xcite in a minimal approximation based on the same ansatz as in eqs . ( [ eq_ansatz1],[eq_ansatz2 ] ) . the two main differences are that : \(i ) the present equations are directly considered at zero temperature ( and zero auxiliary temperature ) and subdominant terms proportional to @xmath246 do not appear in the beta functionals . \(ii ) more importantly , since from the previous formalism we had no insight into the requirements for avoiding an _ explicit _ breaking of the underlying superrotational invariance at the single - copy level , we had for simplicity set the infrared cutoff function @xmath94 to zero . as a result , the wt identity associated with superrotational invariance was violated at _ all _ scales . the dimensional - reduction property could therefore not be exactly recovered when it was expected to be valid.@xcite we are interested in the long - distance physics of the rfim near its critical point and in the associated ( once unstable ) fixed point . such information can be obtained from the solution of the above coupled frg flow equations with appropriate boundary conditions . we have carried out the three following types of resolution . \(1 ) we have investigated the location of the breakdown of susy associated with the appearance of a cusp in @xmath203 . to this end , we have solved the set of coupled flow equations which is obtained when @xmath214 has a sufficiently regular ( no cusp ) behavior as @xmath247 , _ i.e. _ @xmath215 : see eq . ( [ eq_deltak_small_y ] ) . as already shown , the flow of @xmath218 then coincides with that of @xmath196 , and the np - frg equations for @xmath248 and @xmath196 form a closed set . in addition , we have solved the equation for the second derivative of @xmath249 with respect to @xmath250 , @xmath239 , which depends on @xmath248 and @xmath196 . a divergence in @xmath239 signals the appearance of a cusp in @xmath203 . the numerical task of solving this system of three coupled partial differential equation is reasonable . we discretize the problem both in the time and field directions . we use finite differences to evaluate the field derivatives that appear in the beta functions and use an explicit scheme to find the ( rg ) `` time '' evolution of the functions . \(2 ) when a cusp is present , solving in their full glory the set of coupled partial differential equations for functions of up to two field arguments is a hard task . we have discretized the field variables , using a 2-dimensional grid to solve the equation for @xmath203 . for convenience , we have switched variables from @xmath251 to @xmath252 and @xmath213 and restricted the grid to a trapezoidal region with @xmath253 and @xmath254 . observe that the flow of @xmath203 depends on @xmath255 and @xmath256 and their derivatives . in this sense , the flow equation for @xmath214 is nonlocal since its evolution depends not only on its property in a neighborhood of @xmath257 but also on its values at points faraway in the @xmath257 plane . it is therefore important to choose the trapezoidal grid such that , for all point in the grid , the information necessary for computing the evolution of the function at this point is inside the trapezoid . in the larger simulations we had 60 points in the @xmath258 direction and 50 in the @xmath114 direction . we have solved the set of coupled equations with two kinds of _ modus operandi _ : ( 2-i ) first , for selected values of the dimension @xmath4 we have searched the `` cuspy '' fixed point by dichotomy , starting from `` cuspy '' initial conditions ( @xmath259 ) . depending on the dimension and the regulator parameters , there appears from time to time numerical instabilities . such instabilities showed up for instance in the ( physically not very interesting ) large - field region , where the threshold functions are very small . to keep the latter under control , we have therefore used slightly modified flow equations : this is discussed in appendix [ appendix c ] . ( 2-ii ) secondly , once a proper `` cuspy '' fixed point has been identified in some given @xmath4 , we have followed this fixed point by continuously decreasing or increasing @xmath4 . this was done by looking directly for the roots of the beta functions by means of the hybrid algorithm , using as an initial guess the fixed point found at the previous iteration . we have studied the cuspy fixed point down to @xmath1 ; it is indeed difficult to go down to lower @xmath4 because the anomalous dimensions @xmath260 and @xmath166 become large in low dimensions : @xmath261 ( see also ref . \(3 ) when approaching the critical dimension @xmath262 for both susy and dimensional - reduction breaking from below , the procedures ( 2-i ) and ( 2-ii ) above become inefficient . we have used instead an expansion of the function @xmath263 in @xmath264 with , in practice , @xmath265 note that the expansion can not be applied in the close vicinity of @xmath262 . indeed , one then expects the approach @xmath266 to proceed nonuniformly in @xmath114 through a boundary layer in @xmath267 . it is easy to check that a similar boundary - layer phenomenon is found in the more easily handled 1-loop equation for the rf@xmath268 m near @xmath3,@xcite around the critical value @xmath269 , _ i.e. _ when @xmath270 . to compute the anomalous dimensions , we have defined the amplitudes @xmath37 and @xmath36 appearing in eqs . ( [ eq_eta_z],[eq_etabar_delta ] ) by choosing the specific configuration of the fields as equal to zero . this amounts to imposing @xmath271 @xmath272 which fixes @xmath168 and @xmath169 . in addition to the anomalous dimensions @xmath260 and @xmath166 ( obtained as the fixed - point values @xmath273 and @xmath274 ) , we have computed the critical exponent @xmath275 that controls the escape of the rg flow away from the fixed point along the unstable ( relevant ) direction . this was done by diagonalizing the flow equations around the fixed point and extracting the negative eigenvalue which identifies with @xmath276 . finally , we have chosen a dimensionless cutoff function @xmath277 [ see eqs . ( [ eq_scaled_hatr ] ) and ( [ eq_scaled_wider ] ) ] of the form @xmath278 where @xmath279 [ not to be confused with @xmath280 . this function satisfies the requirements @xmath281 and @xmath282 . it is a modification of the function used in refs . the parameters @xmath283 , @xmath284 and @xmath285 can be optimized via stability considerations ( see refs . [ , , ] ) . they are varied to find a region of values for which the computed critical exponents are stable under changes of the parameters . for more details , see appendix [ appendix c ] . our main result is a numerical confirmation of the scenario put forward above : the np - frg equations allowing us to continuously follow the critical behavior and the associated fixed point as a function of dimension @xmath4 , we find that there is a critical dimension @xmath262 separating a region @xmath286 where susy is valid all along the rg flow ( except possibly right at the fixed point ) and dimensional reduction applies from a region @xmath287 where susy is broken at a finite ir scale along the rg flow and a breakdown of dimensional reduction takes place . by using the procedure ( 1 ) detailed in the above subsection , we have numerically located this critical dimension as @xmath288 ( the precise value has a residual dependence on the chosen cutoff function ) . note that the value @xmath0 obtained here is consistent with the value found in our previous , and somewhat cruder , np - frg approach of the rf@xmath268 m when extrapolating the transition line @xmath289 down to @xmath290 ( see figure 4 of paper ii@xcite ) . for initial conditions of the rg flow at or near the critical point , the second derivative @xmath291 blows up at a finite rg `` time '' @xmath292 for @xmath293 , whereas it stays finite up to the fixed point for @xmath286.@xcite we illustrate the difference of behavior between these two cases in fig . [ fig_larkin ] for a field configuration @xmath294 . np - frg flow of @xmath295 in the regime where susy is valid . the initial conditions at @xmath97 ( _ i.e. _ , @xmath204 ) for @xmath296 and @xmath297 , with @xmath298 , are taken at the fixed - point solution , @xmath299 and @xmath300 [ @xmath301 , and those for @xmath302 and @xmath303 are chosen as @xmath304 and @xmath305 . the upper ( color online blue ) curve corresponds to @xmath306 and one observes that @xmath295 tends to a finite fixed - point value . the lower ( color online red ) curve corresponds to @xmath307 shows a divergence at a finite rg `` time '' @xmath308 . ] the divergence of the full function @xmath239 when @xmath287 is shown in fig . [ fig_larkin_3d ] . ( due to the @xmath200 symmetry , it is more convenient to represent the functions in terms of @xmath298 . ) np - frg flow of @xmath309 for @xmath307 . the initial conditions at @xmath97 ( _ i.e. _ , @xmath204 ) for @xmath296 and @xmath310 are taken at the fixed - point solution , @xmath299 and @xmath300 , and those for @xmath302 and @xmath303 are chosen as @xmath304 and @xmath305 . one observes that the divergence first takes place for small values of @xmath311 . ] we find , as can be anticipated from an analysis of the np - frg equations for @xmath312 , @xmath218 and @xmath239 , that the latter stays finite at @xmath313 and that its fixed - point value for @xmath314 behaves as @xmath315 , as seen in fig . [ fig_d_dr_dpf ] . fixed - point solution @xmath316 for dimensions @xmath317 . note the square - root behavior @xmath318 as a function of dimension . ] when considering dimensions smaller than @xmath262 , one must study the full dependence of the function @xmath319 . we show in fig . [ fig_larkin_y ] the evolution of this function for @xmath320 . starting from a constant function , one can clearly see that a linear cusp in @xmath114 appears in a finite rg time @xmath321 , close to 0.7 for the case shown . np - frg flow of @xmath322 for @xmath323 . the initial conditions at @xmath97 ( _ i.e. _ , @xmath204 ) for @xmath296 and @xmath310 are taken at the fixed - point solution , @xmath299 and @xmath300 , and that for @xmath249 is chosen as @xmath324 . one observes that a linear cusp appears at a finite rg time . by construction @xmath325 along the flow . ] the appearance of a cusp along the flow leads to a breakdown of the superrotational invariance and of the associated wt identities . this is illustrated for the @xmath2 fixed point in fig [ fig_d0z3d ] : there , @xmath326 , which implies a breaking of the wt identity in eq . ( [ eq_wt_approx ] ) . fixed - point solution in @xmath2 for @xmath300 ( solid line ) and @xmath327 ( dashed line ) . the two functions differ for a large enough field ( by construction , they coincide at @xmath320 ) . ] the different asymptotic behaviors at large @xmath311 are easily deduced from eqs . ( [ eq_z_ising],[eq_v_ising ] ) , from which we show that @xmath328 and @xmath329 . in @xmath2 , @xmath330 is very small , which implies that the function @xmath327 decreases slowly to @xmath331 . fixed - point solution @xmath332 for dimensions ranging from 3 ( steepest ) to 4.8 ( smoother curve ) . the variable @xmath311 has been rescaled by a factor @xmath333 so that all curves can be represented on the same plot . ] fixed - point solution @xmath300 for dimensions ranging from 3 ( steepest ) to 4.8 ( smoother curve ) . the variable @xmath311 has been rescaled by a factor @xmath333 so that all curves can be represented on the same plot . ] we also display in figs . [ fig_uppf ] and [ fig_zpf ] the fixed - point solutions @xmath332 and @xmath300 for different dimensions . one can see that the lower the dimension the steeper the curves . this means that for a numerical study of the critical properties in low dimensions , we need to discretize the field dependence in the np - frg equations with a small mesh , which entails a large number of points . the numerical integration is therefore more difficult and even becomes intractable in practice . finally , we show in fig . [ fig_deltapf ] the full dependence of the fixed - point solution @xmath334 . fixed - point solution @xmath334 in @xmath2 . note that the point @xmath335 corresponds to the lower right corner . the function is even in @xmath114 ( with a cusp around @xmath221 ) and the part corresponding to @xmath336 is not shown . ] we now turn to the results concerning the critical exponents . we begin with the anomalous dimensions @xmath260 and @xmath337 which are determined at the ( critical ) fixed point . ( we recall that @xmath260 characterizes the spatial decay of the `` connected '' pair correlation function and @xmath166 that of the `` disconnected '' pair correlation function at criticality . ) their dependence on the spatial dimension @xmath4 is shown in fig . [ fig_eta ] . anomalous dimensions @xmath260 and @xmath338 as functions of the spatial dimension @xmath4 . the dashed lines are lower bounds for the anomalous dimensions [ @xmath339 and @xmath340 for @xmath260 and @xmath166 respectively ] and the crosses correspond to predictions from computer simulations and ground - state determinations . ] above @xmath0 , we find that @xmath260 and @xmath166 rigorously coincide , @xmath341 , which is the signature of dimensional reduction . ( their value is moreover equal to that found in the same order of the derivative expansion for the pure ising model in dimension @xmath5 . ) below @xmath262 , the two anomalous dimensions bifurcate and @xmath342 . note that the predicted values satisfy the required bounds , _ i.e. _ , @xmath343 , @xmath344 , @xmath345 . we give in table [ tab_results_eta_etab ] our estimates for @xmath260 and @xmath166 in @xmath2 and @xmath3 , where a comparison is possible with numerical determinations from computer studies ( monte carlo calculations and @xmath65 ground - state determinations ) . .[tab_results_eta_etab ] comparison between the anomalous dimensions obtained in the present work and in computer studies ( a : [ ] ; b : [ ] ; c : [ ] ; d : [ ] ; e : [ ] ; f : [ ] ; g : [ ] ; h : [ ] ; i : [ ] ; j : [ ] ; k : [ ] ; l : [ ] ; m : [ ] ; n : [ ] ) . the error bars on the results from simulations and ground - state computations can be found in the original papers.the values of the temperature exponent @xmath346 that we obtain are @xmath347 in @xmath2 and @xmath348 in @xmath3 , in excellent agreement with the other studies . [ cols="<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] one can see that the agreement is good or very good . ( real - space rg studies in @xmath2@xcite provide results in the same range , with an anomalous dimension @xmath260 between @xmath349 to @xmath350 and an exponent @xmath165 between @xmath351 and @xmath352 . ) as is well known from the study of simpler models such as the pure @xmath268 model , the way to further improve the accuracy of the exponents would be to consider higher orders of the approximation scheme presented in section iv - a . we have not been able to perform our np - frg calculation down to the lower critical dimension @xmath353 , where the values @xmath354 and @xmath355 are exactly known . the numerical resolution of the flow equations become extremely arduous in low dimension where the anomalous dimensions become large and approach their lower bound , @xmath339 and @xmath340 respectively . in addition , one also encounters numerical difficulties as one approaches the critical dimension @xmath262 from below . indeed , as mentioned in section iv - d , it is anticipated that the limit @xmath356 , @xmath215 is nonuniform with a boundary layer in @xmath267 . more work will be needed to solve this boundary - layer problem numerically . [ fig_eta ] also provides evidence that the claim according to which the two exponents @xmath260 and @xmath166 are related by a fixed ratio , @xmath357,@xcite can not be right in general . it is true that the relation @xmath357 is exact in @xmath353 ( and according to a phenomenological rg,@xcite also at first order in @xmath358 ) and is very closely obeyed by the numerical estimates in @xmath2 and @xmath3 ( see table [ tab_results_eta_etab ] ) . however , the latter type of `` numerical evidence '' can always be challenged , and it is actually impossible to reach a definite conclusion on the sole basis of numerical results in selected dimensions ( @xmath359 ) . on the other hand , the overall and continuous dependence on spatial dimension that we provide through the np - frg leads to a different and firmer type of answer : since one goes from @xmath341 for @xmath360 to @xmath361 above , the relation @xmath357 can not be always valid . finally , we also display our results in @xmath2 and @xmath3 for the correlation length exponent @xmath275 , which is associated with the relevant direction around the critical fixed point , in table i. the agreement with the available data from computer studies is excellent in @xmath3 and fair in @xmath2 . ( note that in the real - space rg studies in @xmath2@xcite , the exponent @xmath275 is in general too large , with values ranging from @xmath362 to @xmath363 . ) all the other critical exponents are obtained in the np - frg through the expected relations : @xmath364 , @xmath365 , @xmath366 , etc.@xcite the validity of the theoretical description is clearly confirmed by both the overall consistency and the quantitative accuracy of the predictions in @xmath2 and @xmath3 . to assess the effect of a nonzero auxiliary temperature and of a deviation from `` grassmannian ultralocality '' , we have considered the simplest `` non - ultralocal '' contribution to the cumulants introduced in section vii - b of paper iii . combined with the above truncation of the `` ultralocal '' contributions of effective average action [ eqs . ( [ eq_ansatz1],[eq_ansatz2 ] ) ] , this amounts to expressing the first cumulant as ( see eq . ( 136 ) of paper iii ) @xmath367 = \int_{\underline{\theta}_1 } \bigg ( \gamma_{k1 } [ \phi_1(\underline{\theta}_1)]+\frac{1}{2\beta}(1 + \beta \bar \theta_1 \theta_1)\times \\ & \int_x y_{k}(\phi_1(x,\underline{\theta}_1))\partial _ { \theta_1 } \phi_1(x,\underline{\theta}_1)\partial_{\bar \theta_1 } \phi_1(x,\underline{\theta}_1 ) \bigg ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath109 $ ] given in eq . ( [ eq_ansatz1 ] ) , whereas the second - order cumulant is taken as purely `` ultralocal '' and given in eq . ( [ eq_ansatz2 ] ) . the frg flow equation for the function @xmath368 is directly obtained from eq . ( 139 ) of paper iii . in a dimensionless form , it reads @xmath369 l^{(d)}_2(\varphi)+(\bar \eta_k-\eta_k)j^{(1,d)}_2(\varphi)\big\}+ o(t_k ) , \end{split}\ ] ] where the threshold functions are defined in appendix [ appendixb ] . in deriving the above expression from eq . ( 139 ) of the preceding paper , we have used the dimensionless quantity @xmath370 defined through @xmath371 and the fact that as @xmath372 , @xmath373 the above equation is valid provided that @xmath374 which asymptotically goes as @xmath375 is subdominant with respect to @xmath376 . as discuss just below , this is indeed true , although @xmath370 goes to zero at the fixed point . the flow of the `` ultralocal '' quantities in the limit @xmath46 has already been solved and we can introduce the corresponding solution in eq . ( [ eq_flow_ydimensionless ] ) . we have solved the latter equation and found that @xmath377 goes to zero as one approaches the fixed point , in such a way that the dimensionful quantity @xmath378 goes to a constant @xmath379 : this is illustrated in fig . 10 for @xmath2 . of the dimensionless field with @xmath380 . after a transient regime , the function tends to a constant . ] in addition , we can investigate the effect of the `` non - ultralocal '' contribution to the flow of the `` ultralocal '' quantities when the auxiliary temperature @xmath15 is different from zero . this can be done by considering the erge s for the `` ultralocal '' components of the first and the second cumulants given in eqs . ( 134 ) and ( 135 ) of paper iii . from the above results ( in particular , the fact that @xmath376 goes to a finite constant when @xmath372 ) , we know that @xmath381 is asymptotically equal to @xmath382 : see eq . ( [ eq_hatqp_approx ] ) and discussion below . the flow of the dimensionless first cumulant therefore follows eq . ( 151 ) of paper iii and the contribution of the `` non - ultralocal '' piece goes as @xmath246 times a well - behaved function(al ) , with @xmath383 and @xmath384 . the flow of the second cumulant is also of the form of eq . ( 151 ) in the preceding paper , but the dimensionless beta function due to the `` non - ultralocal '' piece is now potentially singular when a cusp appears in the limit of zero ( auxiliary ) temperature of the second cumulant . more specifically , one finds that @xmath385+perm(12 ) \big\ } , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath386 is the zero ( auxiliary ) temperature beta functional obtained by taking derivatives with respect to @xmath183 and @xmath184 of the right - hand side of eq . ( [ eq_v_ising ] ) and we have omitted subdominant terms coming from the difference between @xmath387 and @xmath388 ( see above ) . we can now follow the derivation done for the effect of the ( bath ) temperature in the formalism without superfields ( see paper ii@xcite ) . after changing variables from @xmath389 to @xmath390 and @xmath391 , one obtains the solution for @xmath392 in the close vicinity of the fixed point , when both @xmath246 and @xmath114 go to zero , in the form of a boundary layer @xmath393 + o(t_k^2 ) , \end{split}\ ] ] where @xmath394 , @xmath395 , @xmath396 are well - behaved functions of @xmath19 and @xmath397 is equal to the absolute value of the coefficient of the cusp in the zero - temperature fixed - point function @xmath398 . the connection between this boundary - layer phenomenon and the presence of rare low - energy excitations above the ground - state known as `` droplets''@xcite is the same as that already discussed in our previous work@xcite ( see also refs . [ , ] ) and the discussion is not repeated here . in this paper and the preceding one @xcite we have extended our np - frg approach of disordered systems , which was initiated in the previous articles of this series.@xcite the objective was to discuss the property of dimensional reduction and its breakdown in the rfim from the parisi - sourlas@xcite perspective of an underlying supersymmetry and its breaking . we have reformulated the np - frg in a superfield formalism and , to do so , we have proposed a solution for properly selecting the ground state among the many metastable states that are present at zero temperature . through the introduction of an appropriate regulator and a supersymmetry - compatible nonperturbative approximation , we have been able to follow the supersymmetry ( more precisely , the superrotational invariance ) and its spontaneous breaking along the rg flow . despite the fact that the effective hamiltonian ( or microscopic action ) in the presence of a random field has numerous minima in the region of interest near the critical point , dimensional reduction need not be systematically broken . by implementing a np - frg flow for the cumulants of the renormalized disorder , our work shows that there is a finite range of dimension below the upper critical dimension , @xmath399 , for which this multiplicity of minima has no effect on the long - distance properties of the model . more precisely , the scaling behavior around the critical point conforms to the dimensional - reduction predictions . the associated fixed point is characterized by a nonanalytic dependence of the effective action in the dimensionless fields , at odds with a naive description based on perturbation theory , but the nonanalyticity is too weak to alter the spectrum of critical exponents . it is only by going below a critical dimension @xmath262 , which we numerically find around @xmath400 , that spontaneous breaking of the supersymmetry ( superrotational invariance ) takes place . the robustness of our theoretical description , which explains the pending puzzles concerning the critical behavior of the rfim , is supported by the good agreement obtained between the np - frg predictions for the critical exponents and the available values from computer studies . finally , one may wonder whether the formalism developed here can be useful in a different context . an obvious extension is a study of the long - distance physics of self - avoiding branched polymers and the associated property of reduction to the yang - lee edge singularity problem in two fewer dimensions.@xcite dimensional reduction is known to hold in this case,@xcite and this provides a benchmark model to test the ability of our nonperturbative approximation scheme to reproduce this property . another extension concerns the hysteresis behavior and out - of - equilibrium phase transitions of the rfim at zero temperature when driven by a slow change of the external magnetic field.@xcite work in those directions is under way . more challenging , and far more speculative too , is the question known as the `` gribov ambiguity '' in the nonperturbative quantization of nonabelian gauge field theories.@xcite the standard faddeev - popov gauge - fixing procedure aims at restricting the functional integral over the gauge field to nonequivalent gauge configurations ( _ i.e _ , configurations that are not obtainable one from another by a gauge transformation ) . unfortunately , the gauge - fixing conditions that respect lorentz invariance and internal ( color ) symmetry , such as the landau gauge condition , are inconsistent because they admit solutions that are equivalent up to a gauge transformation ( `` gribov copies '' ) . there has been a strong theoretical effort to overcome this problem . this `` gribov ambiguity '' does not affect the perturbative regime , so that calculations at high energy can be performed in the standard faddeev - popov approach . however , very little is known on its influence in the nonperturbative regime . the gribov - zwanziger model @xcite enables one to reduce the number of copies taken into account in the functional , but not to a single one , and , up to now , there is no unambiguous gauge - fixing procedure . the strong connections between the faddeev - popov and the parisi - sourlas formalisms , and their common failure when the relevant field equation has a multiplicity of solutions , have been underlined.@xcite the relevance of the tools and concepts developed in the present and the preceding papers to the problem of the gribov ambiguity has yet to be investigated . to illustrate that a linear cusp in @xmath144 does not generate a supercusp and may break dimensional reduction , we consider the erge for the fourier transform of the 2-point proper vertex @xmath401 ( for uniform fields ) in the limit @xmath402 . we switch to the variables @xmath403 and @xmath404 and we study a situation in which a cusp is present : @xmath405 where @xmath406 and @xmath407 ( recall that @xmath120 is even in @xmath137 and @xmath408 separately ) . with the assumption concerning the behavior of the proper vertices detailed in sec . iii - b , we find that the flow of @xmath120 , where for simplicity we take @xmath409 , can be written in the @xmath406 limit : @xmath410 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath411 denotes the terms that could be obtained by directly considering the flow of @xmath412 and by assuming a regular behavior of its beta - functional when @xmath406 . the contribution due to the derivatives of the third cumulant @xmath413 is an even function of @xmath408 ; the @xmath414 term contributes to the regular component of the beta - functional and the next term is a @xmath415 ) with @xmath416 . the above equation indicates that a `` supercusp '' with @xmath417 leads to an ill - defined flow for @xmath412 . for @xmath418 ( cusp ) one should also study the erge for the third cumulant to determine the leading nonanalyticity ( _ i.e. _ , @xmath419 ) and therefore study the stability of the cusp under further rg flow . in any case , eq . ( [ eq_flow_cusp_stab ] ) shows that a cusp weaker than linear , with @xmath420 , has no effect on the flow of @xmath412 and , since @xmath421 is obtained from the latter , is not expected to modify dimensional reduction . a linear cusp ( @xmath422 ) on the other hand provides a possible mechanism for the failure of dimensional reduction while not _ a priori _ generating stronger nonanalyticities . in order to actually lead to breakdown of dimensional reduction , the linear cusp must of course remain in the renormalized second cumulant up to the appropriate fixed point . the various dimensionless threshold functions correspond to the various @xmath133-loop integrals involving the infrared cutoff functions and the propagators ( after account of the scaling dimensions ) . more specifically , they are defined as follows:@xcite @xmath423 @xmath424 @xmath425 with @xmath426 , @xmath279 , and @xmath427 acts only on the dimensionless function @xmath428 that is contained in the @xmath429s@xcite(by definition , @xmath430 $ ] ) . note that , in addition to the dependence on @xmath431 and @xmath432 , the threshold functions explicitly depend on the scale @xmath42 via the running anomalous dimension @xmath168 . ( note also that the functions @xmath433 and @xmath434 are not symmetric in the exchange of the indices @xmath133 and @xmath20 . ) the generic properties of these dimensionless threshold functions are discussed in detail in ref . [ ] . in the present study , it is also necessary to introduce additional threshold functions , which accounts for the fact that the cutoff function @xmath435 has an anomalous scaling compared to @xmath436 when dimensional reduction is broken . these threshold functions then always appear multiplied by @xmath437 in the flow equations . we define : @xmath438 and @xmath439 we summarize here a number of relations that are useful in the developments of sec . one has @xmath440 , @xmath441 , @xmath442 , @xmath443 , with @xmath444 . in addition , the functions @xmath445 s and @xmath446 s are related by @xmath447 from the above definitions , one also straightforwardly finds that @xmath448 @xmath449 and @xmath450 @xmath451 @xmath452 similar relations hold for the functions @xmath453 and @xmath454 . from these expressions one can obtain the derivatives with respect to the field arguments @xmath455 by using that @xmath431 and @xmath456 . dependence of the anomalous dimensions @xmath260 ( upper panel ) , @xmath166 ( middle panel ) and of the critical exponent @xmath275 ( lower panel ) on the parameter @xmath283 of the ir cutoff function in eq . ( [ eq_chosen_r ] ) . the `` principle of minimal sensitivity '' leads to a determination of the anomalous exponents @xmath457 , @xmath458 , @xmath459 ( at the minima ) . the variations of the anomalous dimensions are very small over a wide range of @xmath283 and enables us to evaluate the precision to @xmath460 and @xmath461 . @xmath275 is more sensitive to the regulator parameters and we estimate @xmath462,title="fig : " ] dependence of the anomalous dimensions @xmath260 ( upper panel ) , @xmath166 ( middle panel ) and of the critical exponent @xmath275 ( lower panel ) on the parameter @xmath283 of the ir cutoff function in eq . ( [ eq_chosen_r ] ) . the `` principle of minimal sensitivity '' leads to a determination of the anomalous exponents @xmath457 , @xmath458 , @xmath459 ( at the minima ) . the variations of the anomalous dimensions are very small over a wide range of @xmath283 and enables us to evaluate the precision to @xmath460 and @xmath461 . @xmath275 is more sensitive to the regulator parameters and we estimate @xmath462,title="fig : " ] dependence of the anomalous dimensions @xmath260 ( upper panel ) , @xmath166 ( middle panel ) and of the critical exponent @xmath275 ( lower panel ) on the parameter @xmath283 of the ir cutoff function in eq . ( [ eq_chosen_r ] ) . the `` principle of minimal sensitivity '' leads to a determination of the anomalous exponents @xmath457 , @xmath458 , @xmath459 ( at the minima ) . the variations of the anomalous dimensions are very small over a wide range of @xmath283 and enables us to evaluate the precision to @xmath460 and @xmath461 . @xmath275 is more sensitive to the regulator parameters and we estimate @xmath462,title="fig : " ] in the exact formulation of the np - frg , the results of the flow equations are independent of the ir regulator , which is only an intermediate means that does not affect the long - distance physics . once approximations are introduced , a residual dependence on the choice of regulator however remains . ( a similar situation occurs in perturbation theory where a residual dependence on the parameters of the borel resummation procedure is observed . ) one can in some sense optimize the choice of ir cutoff function by demanding that the output , say the critical exponents , satisfies a property of `` minimal sensitivity '' such that by varying the characteristics of the cutoff function around the optimum , a minimal variation of the exponents results . this guarantees the stability of the results . we apply this procedure to the type of function given in eq . ( [ eq_chosen_r ] ) where the parameters @xmath283 , @xmath284 , and @xmath285 can be varied . we illustrate in fig . [ fig_etapms ] the dependence of the anomalous dimensions in @xmath2 on the parameter @xmath283 when @xmath284 and @xmath285 are kept fixed at the values @xmath463 and @xmath464 respectively ( these latter values were determined by preliminary variational studies to find minimal sensitivity ) . one can see that there is a large domain of values in which @xmath260 and @xmath166 vary little ( say by less than @xmath465 ) . we use the `` principle of minimal sensitivity '' to determine the best estimate of the critical exponents [ note that the minima of @xmath466 and @xmath467 happen at very close values of @xmath283 ] . we also estimate the error bars from the observation that when @xmath283 varies in the range [ 1.5,3 ] , the maximum variation of @xmath260 is of 0.03 and that of @xmath338 is of 0.04 . these are the values that we have reported in sec . [ sec : results ] . during the numerical integration of the flow , we encountered numerical instabilities in physically unimportant regions ( typically , at large fields ) . the origin of these instabilities can be understood as follows . in the region of large fields , the threshold functions rapidly decrease to zero . in this limit , the flow of a function is given by the dimensional part , _ i.e. _ the flow obtained by setting @xmath469 [ _ e.g. _ @xmath470 . this flow no longer depends on the second derivative of the associated function with respect to the field . however , this diffusive - like term [ @xmath471 in our previous example ] is very important to stabilize the numerical integration . in practice , when necessary , we have therefore added by hand a small diffusive contribution to the flow equations and checked that the numerical results are stable under varying the strength of these extra terms . the physics associated with griffiths phases " is however unlikely to be captured by such an approach . in this case the rare regions that are involved are exponentially suppressed as their size increases and produce very weak ( essential ) singularities in the thermodynamics . such a behavior does not show up easily once the average over disorder has been performed , as done in the cumulants . droplets on the other hand are `` power - law rare '' regions in their size and have a clear signature in the functional dependence of the cumulants of the renormalized disorder ( see _ e.g. _ the detailed work by balents and ledoussal on the random manifold model.@xcite ) the same is true for avalanches " , which are collective discontinuous events occurring in _ typical _ samples at zero temperature for exceptional values of the applied source . we define `` supercusp '' , `` cusp '' , and `` subcusp '' in @xmath472 according to the order of the nonanalyticity in @xmath473 when @xmath402 : @xmath474 corresponds to a supercusp , @xmath475 to a `` cusp '' , and @xmath419 a noninteger @xmath476 to a subcusp . a `` linear cusp '' is associated with @xmath477 . this can be generalized to higher - order cumulants of the renormalized random field . note that there does not seem to be any alternative route , for instance by introducing new sources conjugate to operators that break susy explicitly.we have not found any useful additional wt identities when the invariance under superrotations is broken . to check this , we have followed zinn - justin s procedure,@xcite which amounts to performing transformations on the action and adding sources to the new generated independent operators . however , introducing new operators to compensate for the terms breaking susy breaks additional symmetries , including rotations in euclidean subspace , and an increasing number of independent operators are generated at each new iteration of the procedure . if one also wishes to describe microscopic details associated with a specific definition of the bare action and keep a finite uv cutoff @xmath40 , one has to generalize the function @xmath277 to @xmath478 , with @xmath479 when @xmath480 and @xmath481 ; a possible choice of @xmath482 is @xmath483 where @xmath484 is the heaviside step function . when @xmath485 for @xmath147 fixed , the infrared cutoff function @xmath486 diverges as @xmath487 whereas @xmath488 goes to @xmath489 , which fulfills the requirements described in paper iii.@xcite the constraint of no explicit susy breaking and the associated wt identities are not easily implemented in other approximation schemes . for instance one could envisage to replace the derivative expansion by a more powerful scheme to describe the full momentum dependence of the proper vertices , as proposed in ref . [ ] . however , it is not obvious then to combine this approximation with the expansion in cumulants . note that if the bare random field is not gaussian distributed , one can not bluntly neglect all higher - order cumulants . one should then check that , as expected , the non - gaussian behavior that is present at the bare level does not change the long - distance physics . to assess this point , it is necessary to include in the description at least the third cumulant and then consider the next order of the approximation scheme . when @xmath317 , one anticipates a subcusp in @xmath490 as @xmath491 , with no implication for the dimensional reduction . numerically however , it is very hard to find evidence for such subcusps as this would involve computing high orders in the derivatives with respect to the fields : for instance , one should be able to follow the fourth derivative of @xmath214 with respect to @xmath114 and check for its divergence at the fixed point above @xmath262 . one can also check that the `` magnetic - field eigenvalue '' @xmath492 corresponding to the relevant direction associated with odd eigenfunctions in the field arguments is analytically obtained in any dimension as @xmath493 , which as expected is the dimension of the fields ; the corresponding eigenfunctions @xmath494 , @xmath495 , and @xmath496 are expressed in terms of the fixed - point functions , namely : @xmath497 , @xmath498 , and @xmath499 . Abstract:
[ "we apply the nonperturbative functional renormalization group ( np - frg ) in the superfield formalism that we have developed in the preceding paper to study long - standing issues concerning the critical behavior of the random field ising model . through the introduction of an appropriate regulator and a supersymmetry - compatible nonperturbative approximation , we are able to follow the supersymmetry , more specifically the superrotational invariance first unveiled by parisi and sourlas [ phys . rev . lett . * 43 * , 744 ( 1979 ) ] , and its spontaneous breaking along the rg flow . breaking occurs below a critical dimension @xmath0 , and the supersymmetry - broken fixed point that controls the critical behavior then leads to a breakdown of the `` dimensional reduction '' property . we solve the np - frg flow equations numerically and determine the critical exponents as a function of dimension down to @xmath1 , with a good agreement in @xmath2 and @xmath3 with the existing numerical estimates ." ]
14,063
14,063
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: a hundred years and more of fundamental research in atomic and nuclear physics has shown that all matter is corpuscular , with the atoms that comprise us , themselves containing a dense nuclear core . this core is composed of protons and neutrons , referred to collectively as nucleons , which are members of a broader class of femtometre - scale particles , called hadrons . in working toward an understanding of hadrons , we have discovered that they are complicated bound - states of quarks and gluons . these quarks and gluons are elementary , pointlike excitations , whose interactions are described by a poincar invariant quantum non - abelian gauge field theory ; namely , quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) . the goal of hadron physics is the provision of a quantitative explanation of the properties of hadrons through a solution of qcd . quantum chromodynamics is the strong - interaction part of the standard model of particle physics and solving qcd presents a fundamental problem that is unique in the history of science . never before have we been confronted by a theory whose elementary excitations are not those degrees - of - freedom readily accessible via experiment ; i.e. , whose elementary excitations are _ confined_. moreover , there are numerous reasons to believe that qcd generates forces which are so strong that less - than 2% of a nucleon s mass can be attributed to the so - called current - quark masses that appear in qcd s lagrangian ; viz . , forces capable of generating mass from nothing , a phenomenon known as dynamical chiral symmetry breaking ( dcsb ) . neither confinement nor dcsb is apparent in qcd s lagrangian and yet they play the dominant role in determining the observable characteristics of real - world qcd . the physics of hadrons is ruled by _ emergent phenomena _ such as these , which can only be elucidated through the use of nonperturbative methods in quantum field theory . this is both the greatest novelty and the greatest challenge within the standard model . we must find essentially new ways and means to explain precisely via mathematics the observable content of qcd . the complex of dyson - schwinger equations ( dses ) is a powerful tool , which has been employed with marked success to study confinement and dcsb , and their impact on hadron observables . this will be emphasised and exemplified in this concise review , which describes selected recent progress in the study of mesons . it complements and extends earlier and other efforts @xcite . the basic problem of hadron physics is to solve qcd . this inspiring goal will only be achieved through a joint effort from experiment and theory because it is the feedback between them that leads most rapidly to improvements in understanding . the hadron physics community now has a range of major facilities that are accumulating data , of unprecedented accuracy and precision , which pose important challenges for theory . the opportunities for researchers in hadron physics promise to expand with the use of extant accelerators , and upgraded and new machines and detectors that will appear on a five - to - ten - year time - scale , in china , germany , japan , switzerland and the usa . a short list of facilities may readily be compiled : beijing s electron - positron collider ; in germany cosy ( jlich cooler synchrotron ) , elsa ( bonn electron stretcher and accelerator ) , mami ( mainz microtron ) , and fair ( facility for antiproton and ion research ) under construction near darmstadt ; in japan j - parc ( japan proton accelerator research complex ) under construction in tokai - mura , 150 km ne of tokyo , and kek , tsukuba ; in switzerland , the alice and compass detectors at cern ; and in the usa , both the thomas jefferson national accelerator facility ( jlab ) , currently being upgraded , with new generation experiments expected in 2016 , and rhic ( relativistic heavy ion collider ) at brookhaven national laboratory . asymptotic coloured states have not been observed , but is it a cardinal fact that they can not ? no solution to qcd will be complete if it does not explain confinement . this means confinement in the real world , which contains quarks with light current - quark masses . this is distinct from the artificial universe of pure - gauge qcd without dynamical quarks , studies of which tend merely to focus on achieving an area law for a wilson loop and hence are irrelevant to the question of light - quark confinement . in stepping toward an answer to the question of confinement , it will likely be necessary to map out the long - range behaviour of the interaction between light - quarks ; namely , qcd s @xmath4-function at infrared momenta . in this connection it is noteworthy that the spectrum of meson and baryon excited states , and hadron elastic and transition form factors provide unique information about the long - range interaction between light - quarks and , in addition , the distribution of a hadron s characterising properties such as mass and momentum , linear and angular amongst its qcd constituents . the upgraded and promised future facilities will provide data that should guide the charting process . however , to make full use of that data , it will be necessary to have poincar covariant theoretical tools that enable the reliable study of hadrons in the mass range @xmath5-@xmath6gev . crucially , on this domain both confinement and dcsb are germane . it is known that dcsb ; namely , the generation of mass _ from nothing _ , does take place in qcd . it arises primarily because a dense cloud of gluons comes to clothe a low - momentum quark @xcite . this is readily seen by solving the dse for the dressed - quark propagator ; i.e. , the gap equation , which yields the result illustrated in fig.[gluoncloud ] . ( in our euclidean metric : @xmath7 ; @xmath8 ; @xmath9 , tr@xmath10=-4 \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$ ] ; @xmath11 $ ] ; @xmath12 ; and @xmath13 timelike @xmath14 @xmath15 . more information is available in app.a of ref.@xcite . ) however , the origin of the interaction strength at infrared momenta , which guarantees dcsb through the gap equation , is currently unknown . this relationship ties confinement to dcsb . the reality of dcsb means the higgs mechanism is largely irrelevant to the bulk of normal matter in the universe . instead the most important mass generating mechanism for light - quark hadrons is the strong interaction effect of dcsb ; e.g. , one may identify it as being responsible for 98% of a proton s mass @xcite . there is a caveat ; namely , as so often , the pion is exceptional . its mass is given by the simple product of two terms , one of which is the ratio of two order parameters for dcsb whilst the other is determined by the current - quark mass ( sec.[psmassformula ] ) . hence the pion would be massless in the absence of a mechanism that can generate a current - mass for at least one light - quark . the impact of a massless , strongly - interacting particle on the physics of the universe would be dramatic . dressed - quark mass function , @xmath16 in eq.([sgeneraln ] ) : _ solid curves _ dse results , explained in @xcite , `` data '' numerical simulations of lattice - qcd @xcite . ( nb . @xmath17mev is the uppermost curve and current - quark mass decreases from top to bottom . ) one observes the current - quark of perturbative qcd evolving into a constituent - quark as its momentum becomes smaller . the constituent - quark mass arises from a cloud of low - momentum gluons attaching themselves to the current - quark . this is dynamical chiral symmetry breaking ( dcsb ) : an essentially nonperturbative effect that generates a quark mass _ from nothing _ ; namely , it occurs even in the chiral limit . ( figure adapted from ref.@xcite.),scaledwidth=66.0% ] it is natural to ask whether the connection between confinement and dcsb is accidental or causal . there are models with dcsb but not confinement , however , a model with confinement but lacking dcsb has not yet been identified ( see , e.g. , secs.2.1 and 2.2 of ref.@xcite ) . this leads to a conjecture that dcsb is a necessary consequence of confinement . it is interesting that there are numerous models and theories which exhibit both confinement and dcsb , and possess an external control parameter such that deconfinement and chiral symmetry restoration occur simultaneously at some critical value of this parameter ; e.g. , quantum electrodynamics in three dimensions with @xmath18 electrons @xcite , and models of qcd at nonzero temperature and chemical potential @xcite . whether this simultaneity is a property possessed by qcd , and/or some broader class of theories , in response to changes in : the number of light - quark flavours ; temperature ; or chemical potential , is a longstanding question . the momentum - dependence of the quark mass , illustrated in fig.[gluoncloud ] , is an essentially quantum field theoretic effect , unrealisable in quantum mechanics , and a fundamental feature of qcd . this single curve connects the infrared and ultraviolet regimes of the theory , and establishes that the constituent - quark and current - quark masses are simply two connected points separated by a large momentum interval . the curve shows that qcd s dressed - quark behaves as a constituent - quark , a current - quark , or something in between , depending on the momentum of the probe which explores the bound - state containing the dressed - quark . it follows that calculations addressing momentum transfers @xmath19 , where @xmath20 is the mass of the hadron involved , require a poincar - covariant approach that can veraciously realise quantum field theoretical effects @xcite . owing to the vector - exchange character of qcd , covariance also guarantees the existence of nonzero quark orbital angular momentum in a hadron s rest - frame @xcite . the dressed - quark mass function has a remarkable capacity to correlate and to contribute significantly in explaining a wide range of diverse phenomena . this brings urgency to the need to understand the relationship between parton properties in the light - front frame , whose peculiar properties simplify some theoretical analyses , and the structure of hadrons as measured in the rest frame or other smoothly related frames . this is a problem because , e.g. , dcsb , an established keystone of low - energy qcd , has not explicitly been realised in the light - front formulation . the obstacle is the constraint @xmath21 for massive quanta on the light front @xcite . it is therefore impossible to make zero momentum fock states that contain particles and hence the vacuum is `` trivial '' . on the other hand , it is conceivable that dcsb is inextricably tied with the formation and structure of goldstone modes and not otherwise a measurable property of the vacuum . this conjecture is being explored @xcite and is something about which more will be written herein ( sec.[inhadroncondensate ] ) . in addition , parton distribution functions , which have a probability interpretation in the infinite momentum frame , must be calculated in order to comprehend their content : parametrisation is insufficient . it would be very interesting to know , e.g. , how , if at all , the distribution functions of a goldstone mode differ from those of other hadrons @xcite . it is worth stating plainly that the potential between infinitely - heavy quarks measured in numerical simulations of quenched lattice - regularised qcd the so - called static potential is simply _ irrelevant _ to the question of confinement in the real world , in which light quarks are ubiquitous . in fact , it is a basic feature of qcd that light - particle creation and annihilation effects are essentially nonperturbative and therefore it is impossible in principle to compute a potential between two light quarks @xcite . drawing on a long list of sources ; e.g. , refs.@xcite , a perspective on confinement was laid out in ref.@xcite . confinement can be related to the analytic properties of qcd s schwinger functions , which are often called euclidean - space green functions . for example , it can be read from the reconstruction theorem @xcite that the only schwinger functions which can be associated with expectation values in the hilbert space of observables ; namely , the set of measurable expectation values , are those that satisfy the axiom of reflection positivity . this is an extremely tight constraint . it can be shown to require as a necessary condition that the fourier transform of the momentum - space schwinger function is a positive - definite function of its arguments . this condition suggests a practical confinement test , which can be used with numerical solutions of the dses ( see , e.g. , sec.iii.c of ref.@xcite and sec.iv of ref.@xcite ) . the implications and use of reflection positivity are discussed and illustrated in sec . 2 of ref.@xcite . it is noteworthy that any 2-point schwinger function with an inflexion point at @xmath22 must breach the axiom of reflection positivity , so that a violation of positivity can be determined by inspection of the pointwise behaviour of the schwinger function in momentum space ( sec.iv.b of ref.@xcite ) . consider then @xmath23 , which is the single scalar function that describes the dressing of a landau - gauge gluon propagator . a large body of work has focused on exposing the behaviour of @xmath23 in the pure yang - mills sector of qcd . these studies are reviewed in ref.@xcite . a connection with the expression and nature of confinement in the yang - mills sector is indicated in fig.[fig : gluonrp ] . the appearance of an inflexion point in the two - point function generated by the gluon s momentum - dependent mass - function is impossible to overlook . hence this gluon can not appear in the hilbert space of observable states . the inflexion point possessed by @xmath24 , visible in fig.[gluoncloud ] , conveys the same properties on the dressed - quark propagator . numerical simulations of lattice - qcd confirm the appearance of an inflexion point in both the dressed - gluon and -quark propagators ; e.g. , see fig.[gluoncloud ] and ref.@xcite . the signal is clearest for the gluon owing to the greater simplicity of simulations in the pure yang - mills sector @xcite . we emphasise that this sense of confinement is essentially quantum field theoretical in nature . amongst its many consequences is that confinement in qcd can not veraciously be represented in potential models . @xmath23 , the function that describes dressing of a landau - gauge gluon propagator , plotted for three distinct cases . a bare gluon is described by @xmath25 ( the dashed line ) , which is plainly convex on @xmath26 . such a propagator has a representation in terms of a non - negative spectral density . in some theories , interactions generate a mass in the transverse part of the gauge - boson propagator , so that @xmath27 , which can also be represented in terms of a non - negative spectral density . in qcd , however , self - interactions generate a momentum - dependent mass for the gluon , which is large at infrared momenta but vanishes in the ultraviolet @xcite . this is illustrated by the curve labelled `` ir - massive but uv - massless . '' with the generation of a mass-_function _ , @xmath23 exhibits an inflexion point and hence can not be expressed in terms of a non - negative spectral density . , scaledwidth=67.0% ] from the perspective that confinement can be related to the analytic properties of qcd s schwinger functions , the question of light - quark confinement can be translated into the challenge of charting the infrared behavior of qcd s _ universal _ @xmath4-function . ( although this function may depend on the scheme chosen to renormalise the theory , it is unique within a given scheme @xcite . of course , the behaviour of the @xmath4-function on the perturbative domain is well known . ) this is a well - posed problem whose solution is an elemental goal of modern hadron physics and which can be addressed in any framework enabling the nonperturbative evaluation of renormalisation constants . it is the @xmath4-function that is responsible for the behaviour evident in figs.[gluoncloud ] and [ fig : gluonrp ] , and one of the more interesting of contemporary questions is whether it is possible to reconstruct the @xmath4-function , or at least constrain it tightly , given empirical information on the gluon and quark mass functions . in order to proceed it is necessary to describe explicitly the best known and simplest dse . the dyson or gap equation describes how quark propagation is influenced by interactions ; viz . , for a quark of flavour @xmath28 , @xmath29 where : @xmath30 is the gluon propagator ; @xmath31 , the quark - gluon vertex ; @xmath32 , a symbol that represents a poincar invariant regularization of the four - dimensional euclidean integral , with @xmath33 the regularization mass - scale ; @xmath34 , the current - quark bare mass ; and @xmath35 , respectively , the vertex and quark wave function renormalisation constants , with @xmath36 the renormalisation point dependence upon which is not usually made explicit . the gap equation s solution is the dressed - quark propagator , @xmath37 which is obtained from eq.([gendsen ] ) augmented by a renormalisation condition . a mass - independent scheme is a useful choice and can be implemented by fixing all renormalisation constants in the chiral limit . ( see , e.g. , ref.@xcite and references therein ; or ref.@xcite for a detailed discussion of renormalisation . ) the mass function , @xmath38 , is independent of the renormalisation point , @xmath36 ; and the renormalised current - quark mass , @xmath39 wherein @xmath40 is the renormalisation constant associated with the lagrangian s mass - term . like the running coupling constant , this `` running mass '' is familiar from textbooks . however , it is not commonly appreciated that @xmath41 is simply the dressed - quark mass function evaluated at one particular deep spacelike point ; viz , @xmath42 the renormalisation - group invariant current - quark mass may be inferred via @xmath43^{\gamma_m } m_f(p^2)\,,\ ] ] where @xmath44 : @xmath18 is the number of quark flavours employed in computing the running coupling ; and @xmath45 is qcd s dynamically - generated renormalisation - group - invariant mass - scale . the chiral limit is expressed by @xmath46 moreover , @xmath47 however , we would like to emphasise that in the presence of dcsb the ratio @xmath48 is not independent of @xmath49 : in the infrared ; i.e. , @xmath50 , it then expresses a ratio of constituent - like quark masses , which , for light quarks , are two orders - of - magnitude larger than their current - masses and nonlinearly related to them @xcite . the gap equation illustrates the features and flaws of each dse . it is a nonlinear integral equation for the dressed - quark propagator and hence can yield much - needed nonperturbative information . however , the kernel involves the two - point function @xmath30 and the three - point function @xmath31 . the gap equation is therefore coupled to the dses satisfied by these functions , which in turn involve higher @xmath51-point functions . hence the dses are a tower of coupled integral equations , with a tractable problem obtained only once a truncation scheme is specified . it is unsurprising that the best known truncation scheme is the weak coupling expansion , which reproduces every diagram in perturbation theory . this scheme is systematic and valuable in the analysis of large momentum transfer phenomena because qcd is asymptotically free but it precludes any possibility of obtaining nonperturbative information . given the importance of dcsb in qcd , it is significant that the dressed - quark propagator features in the axial - vector ward - takahashi identity , which expresses chiral symmetry and its breaking pattern : @xmath52 \,\gamma_5^{fg}(k;p ) = s_f^{-1}(k_+ ) i \gamma_5 + i \gamma_5 s_g^{-1}(k_- ) \ , , \label{avwtimn}\ ] ] where @xmath53 is the total - momentum entering the vertex and @xmath54 is the relative - momentum between the amputated quark legs . to be explicit , @xmath55 , with @xmath56 $ ] , and hence @xmath57 , @xmath58 . in a poincar covariant approach , such as presented by a proper use of dses , no observable can depend on @xmath0 ; i.e. , the definition of the relative momentum . sec.[flavourless ] discusses the important differences encountered in treating flavourless pseudoscalar mesons . in eq.([avwtimn ] ) , @xmath59 and @xmath60 are , respectively , the amputated axial - vector and pseudoscalar vertices . they are both obtained from an inhomogeneous bethe - salpeter equation ( bse ) , which is exemplified here using a textbook expression @xcite : @xmath61_{tu } = z_2 [ \gamma_5 \gamma_\mu]_{tu}+ \int_q^\lambda [ s(q_+ ) \gamma_{5\mu}(q;p ) s(q_- ) ] _ { sr } k_{tu}^{rs}(q , k;p ) , \label{bsetextbook}\ ] ] in which @xmath62 is the fully - amputated quark - antiquark scattering kernel , and the colour- , dirac- and flavour - matrix structure of the elements in the equation is denoted by the indices @xmath63 . nb . by definition , @xmath62 does not contain quark - antiquark to single gauge - boson annihilation diagrams , nor diagrams that become disconnected by cutting one quark and one antiquark line . the ward - takahashi identity , eq.([avwtimn ] ) , entails that an intimate relation exists between the kernel in the gap equation and that in the bse . ( this is another example of the coupling between dses . ) therefore an understanding of chiral symmetry and its dynamical breaking can only be obtained with a truncation scheme that preserves this relation , and hence guarantees eq.([avwtimn ] ) without a fine - tuning of model - dependent parameters . through the gap and bethe - salpeter equations the pointwise behaviour of the @xmath4-function determines the pattern of chiral symmetry breaking ; e.g. , the behaviour in fig.[gluoncloud ] . moreover , the fact that these and other dses connect the @xmath4-function to experimental observables entails that comparison between computations and observations of the hadron mass spectrum , and hadron elastic and transition form factors , can be used to constrain the @xmath4-function s long - range behaviour . in order to realise this goal , a nonperturbative symmetry - preserving dse truncation is necessary . steady quantitative progress can be made with a scheme that is systematically improvable @xcite . in fact , the mere existence of such a scheme has enabled the proof of exact nonperturbative results in qcd . before describing a number of these in some detail , it is worth explicating the range of applications . for example , there are : veracious statements about the pion @xmath64-term @xcite ; radially - excited and hybrid pseudoscalar mesons @xcite ; heavy - light @xcite and heavy - heavy mesons @xcite ; novel results for the pion susceptibility obtained via analysis of the isovector - pseudoscalar vacuum polarisation @xcite , which bear upon the essential content of the so - called `` mexican hat '' potential that is used in building models for qcd ; and a derivation @xcite of the weinberg sum rule @xcite . turning now to a fuller illustration , the first of the results was introduced in ref.@xcite ; namely , a mass formula that is exact for flavour non - diagonal pseudoscalar mesons : @xmath65 where : @xmath66 are the current - masses of the quarks constituting the meson ; and @xmath67 where @xmath68 is the pseudoscalar meson s bound - state bethe - salpeter amplitude : @xmath69 , \label{gengpi}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which is determined from the associated homogeneous bse . it is worth emphasising that the quark wavefunction and lagrangian mass renormalisation constants , @xmath70 , respectively , depend on the gauge parameter in precisely the manner needed to ensure that the right - hand sides of eqs.([fpigen ] ) , ( [ rhogen ] ) are gauge - invariant . moreover , @xmath71 ensures that the right - hand side of eq.([fpigen ] ) is independent of both @xmath36 and @xmath33 , so that @xmath72 is truly an observable ; and @xmath73 ensures that @xmath74 is independent of @xmath33 and evolves with @xmath36 in just the way necessary to guarantee that the product @xmath75 is renormalisation - point - independent . in addition , it should be noted that eq.([mrtrelation ] ) is valid for every pseudoscalar meson and for any value of the current - quark masses ; viz . , @xmath76 , @xmath77 . this includes arbitrarily large values and also the chiral limit , in whose neighbourhood eq.([mrtrelation ] ) can be shown @xcite to reproduce the familiar gell - mann oakes renner relation . the axial - vector ward - takahashi identity , eq.([avwtimn ] ) , is a crucial bridge to eqs.([mrtrelation ] ) ( [ rhogen ] ) ; and on the way one can also prove the following goldberger - treiman - like relations @xcite : @xmath78 wherein the superscript indicates that the associated quantity is evaluated in the chiral limit , and @xmath79 , @xmath80 , @xmath81 are analogues in the inhomogeneous axial - vector vertex of the scalar functions in the @xmath82-meson s bethe - salpeter amplitude . these identities are of critical importance in qcd . the first , eq.([gtlrele ] ) , can be used to prove that a massless pseudoscalar meson appears in the chiral - limit spectrum if , and only if , chiral symmetry is dynamically broken . moreover , it exposes the fascinating consequence that the solution of the two - body pseudoscalar bound - state problem is almost completely known once the one - body problem is solved for the dressed - quark propagator , with the relative momentum within the bound - state identified unambiguously with the momentum of the dressed - quark . this latter emphasises that goldstone s theorem has a pointwise expression in qcd . the remaining three identities are also important because they show that a pseudoscalar meson _ must _ contain components of pseudovector origin . this result overturned a misapprehension of twenty - years standing ; namely , that only @xmath83 is nonzero @xcite . these pseudovector components materially influence the observable properties of pseudoscalar mesons @xcite , as do their analogues in other mesons @xcite . it is natural to reiterate here a prediction for the properties of non - ground - state pseudoscalar mesons , which follows from the exact results described above ; namely , in the chiral limit @xcite @xmath84 this is the statement that goldstone modes are the only pseudoscalar mesons to possess a nonzero leptonic decay constant in the chiral limit when chiral symmetry is dynamically broken . the decay constants of all other pseudoscalar mesons on this trajectory , e.g. , radial excitations , vanish . on the other hand , in the absence of dcsb the leptonic decay constant of each such pseudoscalar meson vanishes in the chiral limit ; i.e , eq.([fpin ] ) is true @xmath85 . lattice - qcd results for the ratio of the decay constants for the first - excited- and ground - state pseudoscalar mesons as a function of the pion mass squared . ( lattice parameters : volume@xmath86 ; @xmath87 , spacing @xmath88fm , two flavours of degenerate sea quarks ; wilson gauge action and clover fermions . ) the `` not improved '' results were obtained from a fermion action with poor chiral symmetry properties . in this case @xmath89 , consistent with expectations based on quantum mechanics . the `` improved '' results were obtained through implementation of the full alpha method for the nonperturbative improvement of the fermion action , which greatly improves the simulation s chiral symmetry properties . in this case , the sign of the ratio was not determined in the simulation but is discussed in ref.@xcite . figure adapted from ref.@xcite.),scaledwidth=66.0% ] from the perspective of quantum mechanics , eq.([fpin ] ) is a surprising fact . the leptonic decay constant for @xmath91-wave states is typically proportional to the wave function at the origin . compared with the ground state , this is smaller for an excited state because the wave function is broader in configuration space and wave functions are normalised . however , it is a modest effect ; e.g. , consider the @xmath92 decay of vector mesons , for which a calculation in relativistic quantum mechanics based on light - front dynamics @xcite yields @xmath93 , consistent with the value inferred from experiment . thus , it is not uncommon for eq.([fpin ] ) to be perceived as `` remarkable '' or `` unbelievable . '' notwithstanding this , in connection with the pion s first radial excitation , the value of @xmath94mev predicted in ref.@xcite is consistent with experiment @xcite and simulations of lattice - qcd @xcite , as illustrated in fig.[fig : fradial ] . it is now recognised that the suppression of @xmath95 is a useful benchmark , which can be used to tune and validate lattice qcd techniques that try to determine the properties of excited states mesons . for the last thirty years , _ condensates _ ; i.e. , nonzero vacuum expectation values of local operators , have been used as parameters in order to correlate and estimate essentially nonperturbative strong - interaction matrix elements @xcite . they are also basic to current algebra analyses . it is conventionally held that such quark and gluon condensates have a physical existence , which is independent of the hadrons that express qcd s asymptotically realisable degrees - of - freedom ; namely , that these condensates are not merely mass - dimensioned parameters in a theoretical truncation scheme , but in fact describe measurable spacetime - independent configurations of qcd s elementary degrees - of - freedom in a hadronless ground state . owing to confinement , however , this view is erroneous @xcite . one may readily recapitulate upon the argument . to begin , note that eq.([fpigen ] ) is the exact expression in qcd for the leptonic decay constant of a pseudoscalar meson . it is a property of the pion and , as consideration of the integral expression reveals , it can be described as the pseudovector projection of the pion s bethe - salpeter wavefunction onto the origin in configuration space . note that the product @xmath96 is called the bethe - salpeter wavefunction because , when a nonrelativistic limit can validly be performed , the quantity @xmath97 at fixed time becomes the quantum mechanical wavefunction for the system under consideration . ( nb . in the neighborhood of the chiral limit , a value for @xmath72 can be estimated via either of two approximation formulae @xcite . these formulae both illustrate and emphasize the role of @xmath72 as an order parameter for dcsb . ) if chiral symmetry were not dynamically broken , then in the neighborhood of the chiral limit @xmath98 @xcite . of course , chiral symmetry is dynamically broken in qcd @xcite and for the ground - state pseudoscalar @xmath99 taken together , these last two observations express the fact that @xmath72 , which is an intrinsic property of the pseudoscalar meson , is a _ bona fide _ order parameter for dcsb . an analysis within chiral perturbation theory @xcite suggests that the chiral limit value , @xmath100 , is @xmath101% below the measured value of 92.4mev ; and efficacious dse studies give a 3% chiral - limit reduction @xcite . now , eq.([rhogen ] ) is kindred to eq.([fpigen ] ) ; it is the expression in quantum field theory which describes the _ pseudoscalar _ projection of the pseudoscalar meson s bethe - salpeter wavefunction onto the origin in configuration space . it is thus truly just another type of pseudoscalar meson decay constant . in this connection it is therefore notable that one may rigorously define an `` in - meson '' condensate ; viz.@xcite : @xmath102 now , using eq.([gtlrele ] ) , one finds @xcite @xmath103 hence the so - called vacuum quark condensate is , in fact , the chiral - limit value of the in - meson condensate ; i.e. , it describes a property of the chiral - limit pseudoscalar meson . one can therefore argue that this condensate is no more a property of the `` vacuum '' than the pseudoscalar meson s chiral - limit leptonic decay constant . moreover , ref.@xcite establishes the equivalence of all three definitions of the so - called vacuum quark condensate : a constant in the operator product expansion @xcite ; via the banks - casher formula @xcite ; and the trace of the chiral - limit dressed - quark propagator . ( nb . in the presence of confinement it is impossible to write a valid nonperturbative definition of a single quark or gluon annihilation operator and therefore impossible to rigorously define a second quantised vacuum for qcd . to do so would be to answer the question : what is the state that is annihilated by an operator which is unknowable ? ) the chiral - limit vacuum quark condensate is therefore qualitatively equivalent to the pseudoscalar - meson leptonic decay constant in the sense that both are obtained as the chiral - limit value of well - defined gauge - invariant hadron - to - vacuum transition amplitudes that possess a spectral representation in terms of the current - quark - mass . thus , whereas it might sometimes be convenient to imagine otherwise , neither is essentially a constant mass - scale that fills all spacetime . hence , in particular , the quark condensate can be understood as a property of hadrons themselves a perspective also advocated in ref.@xcite and now established for all hadrons @xcite which is expressed , for example , in their bethe - salpeter or light - front wave functions . in the latter instance , the light - front - instantaneous quark propagator appears to play a crucial role @xcite . this has enormous implications for the cosmological constant . the universe is expanding at an ever - increasing rate and theoretical physics has tried to explain this in terms of the energy of quantum processes in vacuum ; viz . , condensates carry energy and so , if they exist , must contribute to the universe s dark energy , which is expressed in the computed value of the cosmological constant . the problem is that hitherto all potential sources of this so - called vacuum energy give magnitudes that far exceed the value of the cosmological constant that is empirically determined . this has been described as `` the biggest embarrassment in theoretical physics '' @xcite . however , given that , in the presence of confinement , condensates do not leak from within hadrons , then there are no space - time - independent condensates permeating the universe @xcite . this nullifies completely their contribution to the cosmological constant and reduces the mismatch between theory and observation by a factor of @xmath104 @xcite , and possibly by far more , if technicolour - like theories are the correct paradigm for extending the standard model . in connection with electric - charge - neutral pseudoscalar mesons , eq.([mrtrelation ] ) is strongly modified owing to the non - abelian anomaly . this entails that whilst the classical action associated with qcd is invariant under @xmath105 ( non - abelian axial transformations generated by @xmath106 , where @xmath107 $ ] ) , the quantum field theory is not . the modification is particularly important to properties of @xmath0 and @xmath1 mesons . the latter is obviously a peculiar pseudoscalar meson because its mass is far greater than that of any other light - quark pseudoscalar meson ; e.g. , @xmath108 . we note that the diagram depicted in fig.[fig : nonanomaly ] is often cited as central to a solution of the @xmath0-@xmath1 puzzle . however , as will become clear below , whilst it does contribute to flavour - mixing , the process is immaterial in resolving the @xmath0-@xmath1 conundrum . this simple flavour - mixing diagram is immaterial to the resolution of the @xmath0-@xmath1 conundrum , as is any collection of processes for which the figure may serve as a skeleton diagram . ( straight lines denote quarks and springs denote gluons . ) , scaledwidth=50.0% ] the correct mass formula for flavourless pseudoscalars follows from consideration of the complete @xmath105 ward - takahashi identity : @xmath109 which generalises eq.([avwtimn ] ) . in eq.([avwtig ] ) , @xmath110 are the generators of @xmath111 in the fundamental representation , orthonormalised according to tr@xmath112 ; the dressed - quark propagator @xmath113diag@xmath114 $ ] is matrix - valued ; and @xmath115,\ ] ] where @xmath116 is a matrix of renormalised current - quark masses and the trace is over flavour indices . the final term in the last line of eq.([avwtig ] ) expresses the non - abelian axial anomaly . it can be written @xmath117 and since @xmath118 is a pseudoscalar , it has the general form @xmath119.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the matrix element in eq.([au ] ) represents an operator expectation value in full qcd ; the operation in eq.([amputate ] ) amputates the external quark lines ; and @xmath120 \label{topq } = \partial_\mu k_\mu(x)\ ] ] is the topological charge density operator , where the trace is over colour indices and @xmath121 is the matrix - valued gluon field strength tensor . it is plain and important that only @xmath122 is nonzero . nb . while @xmath123 is gauge invariant , the associated chern - simons current , @xmath124 , is not . thus in qcd no physical state can couple to @xmath124 and hence no state which appears in the observable spectrum can contribute to a resolution of the so - called @xmath125-problem ; i.e. , physical states can not play any role in ensuring that the @xmath1 is not a goldstone mode . as described in sec.[psmassformula ] , if one imagines there are @xmath18 massless quarks , then dcsb is a necessary and sufficient condition for the @xmath126 components of eq.([avwtig ] ) to guarantee the existence of @xmath127 massless bound - states of a dressed - quark and -antiquark . owing to eq.([amputate ] ) , @xmath128 in eq.([avwtig ] ) requires special consideration . one case is easily covered ; viz . , it is clear that if @xmath129 , then the @xmath128 component of eq.([avwtig ] ) is no different to the others and there is an additional massless bound - state in the chiral limit . on the other hand , the large disparity between the mass of the @xmath1-meson and the octet pseudoscalars suggests that @xmath130 in real - world qcd . if one carefully considers that possibility , then the goldberger - treiman relations in eqs.([gtlrele ] ) ( [ gtlrelh ] ) become @xcite @xmath131 it follows that the relationship @xmath132 is necessary and sufficient to guarantee that @xmath133 , the flavourless pseudoscalar vertex , does not possess a massless pole in the chiral limit ; i.e. , that there are only @xmath127 massless goldstone bosons . now , in the chiral limit , @xmath134 if , and only if , chiral symmetry is dynamically broken . hence , the absence of an additional massless bound - state is only assured through the existence of an intimate connection between dcsb and an expectation value involving the topological charge density . this critical connection is further highlighted by the following result , obtained through a few straightforward manipulations of eqs.([avwtig ] ) , ( [ amputate ] ) and ( [ au ] ) : @xmath135 the absence of a goldstone boson in the @xmath128 channel is only guaranteed if this explicit identity between the chiral - limit in - meson condensate and a mixed vacuum polarisation involving the topological charge density is satisfied . mass formulae valid for all pseudoscalar mesons have also been obtained @xcite @xmath136 where @xmath137 for charged pseudoscalar mesons , eq.([newmass ] ) is equivalent to eq.([mrtrelation ] ) , but the novelty of eq.([newmass ] ) is what it expresses for flavourless pseudoscalars . to illustrate , consider the case of a @xmath138-symmetric mass matrix , in which all @xmath139 current - quark masses assume the single value @xmath41 , then this formula yields : @xmath140 plainly , the @xmath1 is split from the goldstone modes so long as @xmath141 . numerical simulations of lattice - qcd have confirmed this identity @xcite . it is important to elucidate the physical content of @xmath142 . returning to the definition : @xmath143 it is readily seen to be another type of in - meson condensate . it is analogous to those discussed in sec.[inhadroncondensate ] but in this case the hadron - to - vacuum transition amplitude measures the topological content of the @xmath1 . one may therefore state that the @xmath1 is split from the goldstone modes so long as its wavefunction possesses nonzero topological content . this is plainly very different to requiring that the qcd vacuum is topologically nontrivial . an illustration of the nature of the contribution to the bethe - salpeter kernel associated with the non - abelian anomaly . all terms have the `` hairpin '' structure illustrated in the lower panel . no finite sum of such intermediate states is sufficient . ( straight lines denote quarks , with @xmath144 and @xmath145 independent , and springs denote gluons . ) ( figure adapted from ref.@xcite.),scaledwidth=70.0% ] within qcd the properties of the @xmath1 can be computed via the bse , just like other mesons . a nonzero value of @xmath142 can be achieved with a bethe - salpeter kernel that contains the contribution depicted in fig.[etaglue ] because one may argue from eqs.([au ] ) and ( [ topq ] ) that an anomaly - related contribution to a meson s bethe - salpeter kernel can not contain external quark or antiquark lines that are connected to the incoming lines : purely gluonic configurations must mediate , as illustrated in fig.[etaglue ] . furthermore , it is straightforward to see that no finite sum of gluon exchanges can serve this purpose . indeed , consider any one such single contribution in the chiral limit . it will be proportional to the total momentum and hence vanish for @xmath146 , in conflict with eq.([etapchiral ] ) . this lies behind the need for something like the kogut - susskind _ ghost _ ; i.e. , the coupling of a massless axial - vector gauge - like field to the chern - simons current , which does not appear in the particle spectrum of qcd because the current is not gauge invariant . ( see ref.@xcite and sec.5.1 of ref.@xcite . ) it is argued @xcite that in qcd with @xmath147 colours , @xmath148 and it can be seen to follow from the gap equation , the homogeneous bse and eqs.([fpia ] ) , ( [ cpres ] ) that @xmath149 one thus obtains @xmath150 the first term vanishes in the limit @xmath151 while the second remains finite . subsequently taking the chiral limit , the @xmath1 mass approaches zero in the manner characteristic of all goldstone modes . ( nb . one must take the limit @xmath151 before the chiral limit because the procedures do not commute @xcite . ) these results are realised in the effective lagrangian of ref.@xcite in a fashion that is consistent with all the constraints of the anomalous ward identity . this is not true of the so - called thooft determinant @xcite . implications of the mass formula in eq.([newmass ] ) were exemplified in ref.@xcite using an elementary dynamical model that includes a one - parameter _ ansatz _ for that part of the bethe - salpeter kernel related to the non - abelian anomaly , an illustration of which is provided in fig.[etaglue ] . the study compares ground - state pseudoscalar- and vector - mesons constituted from all known quarks , excluding the @xmath152-quark . amongst the notable results is a prediction for the mixing angles between neutral mesons ; e.g. , @xmath153 nb . there are necessarily two mixing angles , with each determined at the appropriate pole position in the inhomogeneous vertex . it is interesting that the angles are approximately equal and compare well with the value inferred from a single mixing angle analysis @xcite @xmath154 . it is worth explicating the nature of the flavour - induced difference between the @xmath155 and @xmath156 masses . if one ignores mixing with mesons containing other than @xmath157-quarks ; viz . , works solely within @xmath158 , then @xmath159mev . on the other hand , the full calculation yields @xmath160mev , a factor of ten greater , and one obtains a @xmath155-@xmath0 mixing angle , whose value at the neutral pion mass shell is @xmath161 for comparison , ref.@xcite infers a mixing angle of @xmath162 from a @xmath62-matrix analysis of the process @xmath163he@xmath164 . plainly , mixing with the @xmath0-meson is the dominant non - electromagnetic contribution to the @xmath156-@xmath155 mass splitting . the analogous angle at the @xmath0 mass - shell is @xmath165 the angles in eq.([valmixing ] ) correspond to latexmath:[\ ] ] wherein the bethe - salpeter amplitudes and dressed - quark propagators are discussed above and @xmath404 is a generalization of the dressed - quark - photon vertex , describing a dressed - quark scattering from a zero momentum photon . it satisfies a bse ( here with a rainbow - ladder kernel ) with the inhomogeneous term @xmath405 . here @xmath406 is a light - like vector satisfying . in choosing rainbow - ladder truncation one implements a precise parallel to the symmetry - preserving treatment of the pion charge form factor at , wherein the vector current is conserved by use of ladder dynamics at all three vertices and rainbow dynamics for all three quark propagators @xcite . equation ( [ eucl_pdf_lr_ward ] ) ensures automatically that @xmath407 since @xmath408 gives the ward - identity vertex and the bethe - salpeter amplitudes are canonically normalised . . _ solid curve _ full dse calculation @xcite ; _ dot - dashed curve _ semi - phenomenological dse - based calculation in ref.@xcite ; _ filled circles _ experimental data from ref.@xcite , at scale ( 4.05gev)@xmath319 ; _ dashed curve _ nlo reanalysis of the experimental data @xcite ; and _ dot - dot - dashed curve _ nlo reanalysis of experimental data with inclusion of soft - gluon resummation @xcite . ( adapted from ref.@xcite . ) [ fig : pi_dse],scaledwidth=66.0% ] figure [ fig : pi_dse ] displays the dse results for the pion s valence @xmath179-quark distribution , evolved from a resolving scale @xmath409gev)@xmath319 to @xmath410 using leading - order evolution , and a comparison with @xmath411 drell - yan data @xcite at a scale @xmath412 , inferred via a leading - order analysis . the computation s resolving scale , @xmath413 , was fixed by matching the @xmath414 moments for @xmath415 to an experimental analysis at ( 2gev)@xmath319 @xcite . it is notable that at @xmath413 the dse results yield @xmath416 ( for comparison , the parametrised valence - like pion parton distributions of ref.@xcite yield a gluon momentum fraction of @xmath417 . ) in each case the remainder of the hadron s momentum is carried by gluons , which effect binding of the meson bound state and are invisible to the electromagnetic probe . some fraction of the hadron s momentum is carried by gluons at all resolving scales unless the hadron is a point particle @xcite . indeed , it is a simple algebraic exercise to demonstrate that the only non - increasing , convex function which can produce @xmath418 and @xmath419 , is the distribution @xmath420 , which is uniquely connected with a pointlike meson ; viz . , a meson whose bethe - salpeter amplitude is momentum - independent . thus eqs.([momcons ] ) are an essential consequence of momentum conservation . whilst the dse results in fig.[fig : pi_dse ] are both consistent with eq.([pqcduvx ] ) ; i.e. , they produce algebraically the precise behaviour predicted by perturbative qcd , on the valence - quark domain it is evident that they disagree markedly with the drell - yan data reported in ref.@xcite . this tension was long seen as a crucial mystery for a qcd description of the lightest and subtlest hadron @xcite . its re - emergence with ref.@xcite motivated a nlo reanalysis of the drell - yan data @xcite , the result of which is also displayed in fig.[fig : pi_dse ] . at nlo the extracted pdf is softer at high-@xmath395 but the discrepancy nevertheless remains . to be precise , ref.@xcite determined a high-@xmath395 exponent of @xmath421 whereas the exponents produced by the dse studies @xcite are , respectively , @xmath422 and @xmath423 at the common model scale . they do not allow much room for a harder pdf at high-@xmath395 . following the highlighting of this discrepancy in ref.@xcite , a resolution of the conflict between data and well - constrained theory was proposed . in ref.@xcite a long - overlooked effect was incorporated ; namely , `` soft - gluon resummation . '' with the inclusion of this next - to - leading - logarithmic threshold resummation effect in the calculation of the drell - yan cross section , a considerably softer valence - quark distribution was obtained at high-@xmath395 . this is readily understood . the drell - yan cross - section factorises into two pieces : one hard and the other soft . the soft piece involves the pdf and the hard piece is calculable in perturbation theory . adding additional interactions to the latter , which are important at large-@xmath395 ; viz . , soft gluons , provides greater strength in the hard piece on the valence - quark domain . hence a description of the data is obtained with a softer pdf . indeed , the distribution obtained thereby matches precisely the expectations based on perturbative - qcd and obtained using dses . this is evident in a comparison between the _ dash - dot _ and _ dash - dot - dot _ curves in fig.[fig : pi_dse ] . dse prediction for the ratio of @xmath179-quark distributions in the kaon and pion @xcite . the full bethe - salpeter amplitude produces the _ solid _ curve ; a reduced bse vertex produces the _ dashed _ curve . the reduced amplitude retains only the invariants and amplitudes involving pseudoscalar and axial vector dirac matrices , and ignores dependence on the variable @xmath424 . these are part of the reductions that occur in a pointlike treatment of pseudoscalar mesons . the experimental data is from @xcite . ( adapted from ref.@xcite.),scaledwidth=66.0% ] the ratio @xmath425 measures the effect of the local hadronic environment . in the kaon , the @xmath179-quark is bound with a heavier partner than in the pion and this should cause @xmath426 to peak at lower-@xmath395 than @xmath427 . the dse prediction @xcite is shown in fig.[fig : pi_dse_ratio ] along with available drell - yan data @xcite . the parameter - free dse result agrees well with the data . we note that @xmath428 viz , the ratio approaches one under evolution to larger resolving scales owing to the increasingly large population of sea - quarks produced thereby @xcite . on the other hand , the value at @xmath429 is a fixed - point under evolution : @xmath430 i.e. , it is the same at every value of the resolving scale @xmath323 , and is therefore a persistent probe of nonperturbative dynamics @xcite . with ref.@xcite a significant milestone was achieved ; , unification of the computation of distribution functions that arise in analyses of deep inelastic scattering with that of numerous other properties of pseudoscalar mesons , including meson - meson scattering @xcite and the successful prediction of electromagnetic elastic and transition form factors . the results confirm the large-@xmath395 behavior of distribution functions predicted by the qcd parton model ; provide a good account of the @xmath431-@xmath432 drell - yan data for @xmath427 ; and a parameter - free prediction for the ratio @xmath402 that agrees with extant data , showing a strong environment - dependence of the @xmath179-quark distribution . the new drell - yan experiment running at fnal is capable of validating this comparison , as is the compass ii experiment at cern . such an experiment should be done so that complete understanding of qcd s goldstone modes can be claimed . while a symmetry - preserving description of mesons is essential , it is only part of the physics that nonperturbative qcd must describe because nature also presents us with baryons : light - quarks in three - particle composites . an explanation of the spectrum of baryons and the nature of interactions between them is basic to understanding the standard model . the present and planned experimental programmes at jlab , and other facilities worldwide , are critical elements in this effort . no approach to qcd is comprehensive if it can not provide a unified explanation of both mesons and baryons . we have explained that dcsb is a keystone of the standard model , which is evident in the momentum - dependence of the dressed - quark mass function fig.[gluoncloud ] : it is just as important to baryons as it is to mesons . the dses furnish the only extant framework that can simultaneously connect both meson and baryon observables with this basic feature of qcd , having provided , e.g. , a direct correlation of meson and baryon properties via a single interaction kernel , which preserves qcd s one - loop renormalisation group behaviour and can systematically be improved @xcite . in quantum field theory a baryon appears as a pole in a six - point quark green function . the residue is proportional to the baryon s faddeev amplitude , which is obtained from a poincar covariant faddeev equation that sums all possible exchanges and interactions that can take place between three dressed - quarks . a tractable faddeev equation for baryons @xcite is founded on the observation that an interaction which describes colour - singlet mesons also generates nonpointlike quark - quark ( diquark ) correlations in the colour-@xmath433 ( antitriplet ) channel @xcite . the dominant correlations for ground state octet and decuplet baryons are scalar ( @xmath434 ) and axial - vector ( @xmath435 ) diquarks because , for example , the associated mass - scales are smaller than the baryons masses @xcite and their parity matches that of these baryons . it follows that only they need be retained in approximating the quark - quark scattering matrix which appears as part of the faddeev equation @xcite . we note that diquarks do not appear in the strong interaction spectrum @xcite but the attraction between quarks in this channel justifies a picture of baryons in which two quarks within a baryon are always correlated as a colour-@xmath433 diquark pseudoparticle , and binding is effected by the iterated exchange of roles between the bystander and diquark - participant quarks . here it is important to emphasise strongly that qcd supports _ nonpointlike _ diquark correlations @xcite . hence models that employ pointlike diquark degrees of freedom have little connection with qcd . numerous properties of the nucleon have recently been described using the faddeev equation just outlined , e.g. : a survey of the form factors @xcite , with additional results explicated in refs.@xcite ; indications of the role of quark orbital angular momentum in forming the nucleon s spin @xcite ; and computation of the nucleon s @xmath64-term @xcite . this body of work will be reviewed elsewhere . however , much more can and should be done , as described , for example , in sec.iii of ref.@xcite ; and ref.@xcite is a first step . it is expected that feedback between dse results and extant and forthcoming precision data on nucleon elastic and transition form factors can serve as a practical means by which to empirically chart the momentum evolution of the dressed - quark mass function , and therefrom the infrared behavior of qcd s @xmath4-function . in particular , it should enable the unambiguous location of the transition boundary between the constituent- and current - quark domains , signalled by the sharp drop with increasing momentum that is apparent in fig.[gluoncloud ] , which can likely be related to an infrared inflexion point in qcd s running coupling , whose properties are determined by the @xmath4-function . dynamical chiral symmetry breaking ( dcsb ) is a fact in qcd . it is manifest in dressed - propagators and vertices , and , amongst other things , it is responsible for : the transformation of the light current - quarks in qcd s lagrangian into heavy constituent - like quark s , in terms of which order was first brought to the hadron spectrum ; the unnaturally small values of the masses of light - quark pseudoscalar mesons ; the unnaturally strong coupling of pseudoscalar mesons to light - quarks @xmath436 ; and the unnaturally strong coupling of pseudoscalar mesons to the lightest baryons @xmath437 . herein we have used a diverse range of phenomena to illustrate the dramatic impact that dcsb has upon meson observables , amongst them : the spectrum ; form factors ; and parton distribution functions . unavoidably , many valuable contributions during the last few years were overlooked , some of which may be pursued through refs.@xcite . we have also completely neglected an extensive body of work that focuses on elucidating the nature of the primordial state of matter that has been recreated with rhic : refs.@xcite serve as a starting point for exploring this area of dse research . ( as noted in ref.@xcite , the rainbow truncation of qcd s gap equation excludes what in a point - meson field theory would appear as @xmath438-suppressed meson - loop dressing of the quark propagator , and this is why chiral symmetry restoration is a mean field transition in all models within the rainbow - truncation class @xcite . such meson - loop corrections are capable of correcting the critical exponents ; i.e. , of introducing that infrared divergence in the dressed - quark self - energy which can force a deviation from mean field critical exponents in the chiral symmetry restoring transition . this is illustrated in ref.@xcite . ) in addition , there are attempts to derive an equation of state that may be used in modern astrophysics in order , e.g. , to assist in the identification of a neutron star with a quark - matter core @xcite . a `` smoking gun '' for dcsb is the behaviour of the dressed - quark mass function . the momentum dependence manifest in fig.[gluoncloud ] is an essentially quantum field theoretical effect . exposing and elucidating its consequences therefore requires a nonperturbative and symmetry - preserving approach , where the latter means preserving poincar covariance , chiral and electromagnetic current - conservation , etc . the dyson - schwinger equations ( dses ) provide such a framework . experimental and theoretical studies are underway that will identify observable signals of @xmath24 and thereby confirm and explain the mechanism responsible for the vast bulk of visible mass in the universe . there are many reasons why this is an exciting time in hadron physics . we have focused on one . namely , through the dses , we are positioned to unify phenomena as apparently diverse as : the hadron spectrum ; hadron elastic and transition form factors , from small- to large-@xmath323 ; and parton distribution functions . the key is an understanding of both the fundamental origin of nuclear mass and the far - reaching consequences of the mechanism responsible ; namely , dcsb . these things might lead us to an explanation of confinement , the phenomenon that makes nonperturbative qcd the most interesting piece of the standard model . we acknowledge valuable input from a. bashir , i.c . clot , b. el - bennich , l. x. gutirrez - guerrero , a. kizilers , y .- x . liu , s .- x . qin , j. rodriguez - quintero , s.m . schmidt and d. j. wilson . this work was supported by : the u.s . department of energy , office of nuclear physics , contract no . de - ac02 - 06ch11357 ; forschungszentrum jlich gmbh ; and the u.s . national science foundation , under grant no . phy-0903991 , in conjunction with a conacyt mexico - usa collaboration grant . c. d. roberts and a. g. williams , prog . . phys . * 33 * , pp . 477 - 575 ( 1994 ) . c. d. roberts and s. m. schmidt , prog . * 45 * , pp . s1-s103 ( 2000 ) . maris and c. d. roberts , int . j. mod . e * 12 * , pp . 297 - 365 ( 2003 ) . m. r. pennington , j. phys . ser . * 18 * , pp . 1 - 73 ( 2005 ) . a. hll , c. d. roberts and s. v. wright , `` hadron physics and dyson - schwinger equations , '' nucl - th/0601071 , contribution to the _ proceedings of the 20th annual hampton university graduate studies program ( hugs 2005 ) _ , newport news , virginia , 31 may - 17 jun 2005 , 103 pages . c. s. fischer , j. phys . g * 32 * , pp . r253-r291 ( 2006 ) . c. d. roberts , m. s. bhagwat , a. hll and s. v. wright , eur . j. st * 140 * , pp . 53 - 116 ( 2007 ) . c. d. roberts , prog . . phys . * 61 * , pp . 50 - 65 ( 2008 ) . r. j. holt and c. d. roberts , rev . phys . * 82 * , pp . 2991 - 3044 ( 2010 ) . e. s. swanson , aip conf . * 1296 * , pp . 75 - 121 ( 2010 ) . m. s. bhagwat , i. c. clot and c. d. roberts , `` covariance , dynamics and symmetries , and hadron form factors , '' in _ exclusive reactions at high momentum transfer _ , eds . a. radyushkin and p. stoler ( world scientific , singapore , 2008 ) pp . 112 - 120 ; arxiv:0710.2059 [ nucl - th ] . m. s. bhagwat , m. a. pichowsky , c. d. roberts and p. c. tandy , phys . c * 68 * , 015203 ( 2003 ) [ 9 pages ] . m. s. bhagwat and p. c. tandy , aip conf . proc . * 842 * , pp . 225 - 227 ( 2006 ) . o. bowman _ et al_. , phys . d * 71 * , 054507 ( 2005 ) [ 7 pages ] . v. v. flambaum _ et al_. , few body syst . * 38 * pp . 31 - 51 ( 2006 ) . a. hll , p. maris , c. d. roberts and s. v. wright , nucl . suppl . * 161 * , pp . 87 - 94 ( 2006 ) . a. bashir , a. raya , i. c. clot and c. d. roberts , phys . c * 78 * , 055201 ( 2008 ) [ 7 pages ] . a. bashir , a. raya , s. sanchez - madrigal and c. d. roberts , few body syst . * 46 * , pp . 229 - 237 ( 2009 ) . c. p. hofmann , a. raya and s. s. madrigal , phys . d * 82 * , 096011 ( 2010 ) [ 8 pages ] . a. bender , d. blaschke , yu.l . kalinovsky and c. d. roberts , phys . lett . * 77 * , pp . 3724 - 3727 ( 1996 ) . d. blaschke , c. d. roberts and s. m. schmidt , phys . b * 425 * , pp . 232 - 238 ( 1998 ) a. bender _ et al_. , phys . b * 431 * , pp . 263 - 269 ( 1998 ) . h. chen _ et al_. , phys . d * 78 * , 116015 ( 2008 ) [ 11 pages ] . c. s. fischer and j. a. mueller , phys . d * 80 * , 074029 ( 2009 ) [ 14 pages ] . s .- x . qin _ et al_. , phys . lett . * 106 * , 172301 ( 2011 ) [ 4 pages ] . s .- x . qin , l. chang , y .- x . liu and c. d. roberts , phys . d**84 * * , 014017 ( 2011 ) [ 6 pages ] . y .- x . liu , s .- x . qin , l. chang , c. d. roberts , aip conf . proc . * 1354 * , pp . 91 - 96 ( 2011 ) . i. c. clot _ et al_. , few body syst . * 46 * , pp . 1 - 36 ( 2009 ) . m. s. bhagwat , a. krassnigg , p. maris and c. d. roberts , eur . phys . j. a * 31 * , pp . 630 - 637 ( 2007 ) . m. s. bhagwat and p. maris , phys . c * 77 * , 025203 ( 2008 ) [ 12 pages ] . i. c. clot , a. krassnigg and c. d. roberts , in _ proceedings of 11th international conference on meson - nucleon physics and the structure of the nucleon ( menu 2007 ) _ , jlich , germany , 10 - 14 sep 2007 , 125/1 - 11 , arxiv:0710.5746 [ nucl - th ] . s. j. brodsky and h. c. pauli , lect . notes phys . * 396 * , pp . 51 - 121 ( 1991 ) . s. j. brodsky , c. d. roberts , r. shrock and p. c. tandy , phys . rev . c * 82 * , 022201 ( 2010 ) [ 5 pages ] . s. j. brodsky and r. shrock , proc . sci . * 108 * , pp . 45 - 50 ( 2011 ) . l. chang , c. d. roberts and p. c. tandy , `` expanding the concept of in - hadron condensates , '' arxiv:1109.2903 [ nucl - th ] . g. s. bali _ et al_. , phys . d * 71 * , 114513 ( 2005 ) [ 26 pages ] . l. chang _ et al_. , chin . c * 33 * , pp . 1189 - 1196 ( 2009 ) . articles cited in : v. n. gribov , eur . j. c * 10 * , pp . 91 - 105 ( 1999 ) . h. j. munczek and a. m. nemirovsky , phys . rev . d * 28 * , pp . 181 - 186 ( 1983 ) . m. stingl , phys . d * 29 * , pp . 2105 - 2117 ( 1984 ) . r. t. cahill , austral . j. phys . * 42 * , pp . 171 - 186 ( 1989 ) . g. krein , c. d. roberts and a. g. williams , int . j. mod . phys . a * 7 * , pp . 5607 - 5624 ( 1992 ) . r. f. streater and a. s. wightman , _ pct , spin and statistics , 3rd edition _ ( addison - wesley , reading , massachussets , 1980 ) . f. t. hawes , c. d. roberts and a. g. williams , phys . rev . d * 49 * , pp . 4683 - 4693 ( 1994 ) . p. maris , phys . d * 52 * , pp . 6087 - 6097 ( 1995 ) . boucaud , j.p . leroy , a. le yaouanc , j. micheli , o. pne and j. rodriguez - quintero , `` the infrared behaviour of the pure yang - mills green functions , '' to appear in few body syst . , arxiv:1109.1936 [ hep - ph ] . f. d. r. bonnet , p. o. bowman , d. b. leinweber and a. g. williams , phys . rev . d * 62 * , 051501(r ) ( 2000 ) [ 4 pages ] . j. i. skullerud and a. g. williams , phys . d * 63 * , 054508 ( 2001 ) [ 13 pages ] . w. kamleh , p. o. bowman , d. b. leinweber , a. g. williams and j. zhang , phys . d * 76 * , 094501 ( 2007 ) [ 9 pages ] . w. celmaster and r. j. gonsalves , phys . d * 20 * , pp . 1420 - 1434 ( 1979 ) . l. chang _ et al_. , phys . c * 79 * , 035209 ( 2009 ) [ 9 pages ] . p. pascual and r. tarrach , _ qcd : renormalization for the practitioner _ , lecture notes in physics * 194 * ( springer - verlag , berlin , 1984 ) . e. e. salpeter and h. a. bethe , phys . rev . * 84 * , pp . 1232 - 1252 ( 1951 ) . h. j. munczek , phys . d * 52 * , pp . 4736 - 4740 ( 1995 ) . a. bender , c. d. roberts and l. von smekal , phys . lett . b * 380 * , pp . 7 - 12 ( 1996 ) . a. hll , a. krassnigg and c. d. roberts , phys . c * 70 * , 042203(r ) ( 2004 ) [ 5 pages ] . a. hll _ et al_. , phys . c * 71 * , 065204 ( 2005 ) [ 12 pages ] . m. a. ivanov , yu . l. kalinovsky and c. d. roberts , phys . d * 60 * , 034018 ( 1999 ) [ 17 pages ] . l. chang _ et al_. , phys . c * 81 * , 032201(r ) ( 2010 ) [ 4 pages ] l. chang , y. x. liu , w. m. sun and h. s. zong , phys . b * 669 * , pp . 327 - 330 ( 2008 ) . s. weinberg , phys . lett . * 18 * , pp . 507 - 509 ( 1967 ) . p. maris , c. d. roberts and p. c. tandy , phys . b * 420 * , pp . 267 - 273 ( 1998 ) . r. delbourgo and m. d. scadron , j. phys . g * 5 * , pp . 1621 - 1632 ( 1979 ) . maris and c. d. roberts , phys . c * 58 * pp . 3659 - 3665 ( 1998 ) . m. b. hecht , c. d. roberts and s. m. schmidt , phys . c * 63 * , 025213 ( 2001 ) [ 8 pages ] . l. x. gutirrez - guerrero , a. bashir , i. c. clot and c. d. roberts , phys . c * 81 * , 065202 ( 2010 ) [ 5 pages ] . h. l. l. roberts _ et al_. , phys . c * 82 * , 065202 ( 2010 ) [ 10 pages ] . h. l. l. roberts _ et al_. , phys . c * 83 * , 065206 ( 2011 ) [ 12 pages ] . t. nguyen , a. bashir , c. d. roberts and p. c. tandy , phys . c * 83 * , 062201(r ) ( 2011 ) [ 5 pages ] . p. maris and p. c. tandy , phys . c * 60 * , 055214 ( 1999 ) [ 15 pages ] . p. maris and p. c. tandy , phys . c * 61 * , 045202 ( 2000 ) [ 11 pages ] . p. maris and p. c. tandy , phys . c * 62 * , 055204 ( 2000 ) [ 8 pages ] . j. p. b. de melo , t. frederico , e. pace and g. salme , phys . d * 73 * , 074013 ( 2006 ) [ 35 pages ] . m. diehl and g. hiller , jhep * 0106 * , 067 ( 2001)/1 - 36 . s. x. qin _ et al_. , `` commentary on rainbow - ladder truncation for excited states and exotics , '' arxiv:1109.3459 [ nucl - th ] . c. mcneile and c. michael [ ukqcd collaboration and ukqcd collaboration ] , phys . b * 642 * , pp . 244 - 247 ( 2006 ) p. colangelo and a. khodjamirian , `` qcd sum rules , a modern perspective , '' arxiv : hep - ph/0010175 . h. pagels and s. stokar , phys . d * 20 * , pp . 2947 - 2952 ( 1979 ) . r. t. cahill and c. d. roberts , phys . d * 32 * , pp . 2419 - 2428 ( 1985 ) . l. chang and c. d. roberts , phys . * 103 * , 081601 ( 2009 ) [ 4 pages ] . j. bijnens , prog . part . * 58 * , pp . 521 - 586 ( 2007 ) . maris and c. d. roberts , phys . c * 56 * , pp . 3369 - 3383 ( 1997 ) . k. langfeld _ et al_. , phys . c * 67 * , 065206 ( 2003 ) [ 7 pages ] . k. d. lane , phys . d * 10 * , pp . 2605 - 2618 ( 1974 ) . h. d. politzer , nucl . b * 117 * , pp . 397 - 406 ( 1976 ) . t. banks and a. casher , nucl . b * 169 * , pp . 103 - 125 ( 1980 ) . a. casher and l. susskind , phys . d * 9 * , pp . 436 - 460 ( 1974 ) . m. burkardt , phys . d * 58 * , 096015 ( 1998 ) [ 11 pages ] . m. s. turner , `` dark energy and the new cosmology , '' astro - ph/0108103 . m. s. bhagwat _ et al_. , phys . c * 76 * , 045203 ( 2007 ) [ 10 pages ] . w. a. bardeen , a. duncan , e. eichten and h. thacker , phys . d * 62 * , 114505 ( 2000 ) [ 16 pages ] . s. ahmad , j. t. lenaghan and h. b. thacker , phys . d * 72 * , 114511 ( 2005 ) [ 12 pages ] . j. b. kogut and l. susskind , phys . d * 11 * , pp . 3594 - 3610 ( 1975 ) . g. a. christos , phys . rept . * 116 * , pp . 251 - 336 ( 1984 ) . e. witten , nucl . b * 156 * , pp . 269 - 283 ( 1979 ) . g. veneziano , nucl . b * 159 * , pp . 213 - 224 ( 1979 ) . r. narayanan and h. neuberger , nucl . b * 696 * , pp . 107 - 140 ( 2004 ) . p. di vecchia , phys . b * 85 * , pp . 357 - 360 ( 1979 ) . r. j. crewther , phys . b * 70 * , pp . 349 - 354 ( 1977 ) . r. j. crewther , acta phys . austriaca suppl . * 19 * , pp . 47 - 153 ( 1978 ) . c. bini , eur . phys . j. a * 31 * , pp . 446 - 450 ( 2007 ) . a. m. green and s. wycech , phys . rev . c * 68 * , 061601(r ) ( 2003 ) [ 5 pages ] . c. d. roberts , `` confinement , diquarks and goldstone s theorem , '' in _ como 1996 , quark confinement and the hadron spectrum ii _ , eds . n. brambilla and g.m . prosperi ( world scientific , new jersey , 1997 ) , pp . 224 - 230 , proceedings of the `` 2nd international conference on quark confinement and the hadron spectrum , '' como , italy , 26 - 29 jun 1996 , arxiv : nucl - th/9609039 . c. d. roberts , phys . nucl . * 30 * , pp . 223 - 257 ( 1999 ) [ fiz . chast . atom . yadra * 30 * , pp . 537 - 612 ( 1999 ) ] . a. bender , w. detmold , a.w . thomas and c.d . roberts , phys . c * 65 * , 065203 ( 2002 ) [ 16 pages ] . m. s. bhagwat _ et al_. , phys . c * 70 * , 035205 ( 2004 ) [ 15 pages ] . c. j. burden _ et al_. , phys . c * 55 * , pp . 2649 - 2664 ( 1997 ) . p. watson , w. cassing and p. c. tandy , few body syst . * 35 * , pp . 129 - 153 ( 2004 ) . p. maris , aip conf . proc . * 892 * , pp . 65 - 71 ( 2007 ) . c. s. fischer and r. williams , phys . lett . * 103 * , 122001 ( 2009 ) [ 4 pages ] . a. krassnigg , phys . d * 80 * , 114010 ( 2009 ) [ 8 pages ] . a. krassnigg and m. blank , phys . d * 83 * , 096006 ( 2011 ) [ 7 pages ] . a. hll , a. krassnigg , c. d. roberts and s. v. wright , int . j. mod . a * 20 * , pp . 1778 - 1784 ( 2005 ) j. s. ball and t. w. chiu , phys . d * 22 * , pp . 2542 - 2549 ( 1980 ) . a. kizilers and m. r. pennington , phys . d * 79 * , 125020 ( 2009 ) [ 25 pages ] . j. r. pelaez and g. rios , phys . * 97 * ( 2006 ) 242002 [ 4 pages ] . j. ruiz de elvira , j. r. pelaez , m. r. pennington and d. j. wilson , `` chiral perturbation theory , the @xmath439 expansion and regge behaviour determine the structure of the lightest scalar meson , '' arxiv:1009.6204 [ hep - ph ] . h. m. foley and p. kusch , phys . rev . * 73 * , p. 412 j. s. schwinger , phys . rev . * 73 * , pp . 416 - 417 ( 1948 ) . p. j. mohr , b. n. taylor and d. b. newell , rev . phys . * 80 * , pp . 633 - 730 ( 2008 ) . l. chang , y. x. liu and c. d. roberts , phys . lett . * 106 * , 072001 ( 2011 ) [ 4 pages ] . a. i. davydychev , p. osland and l. saks , phys . d * 63 * , 014022 ( 2001 ) [ 31 pages ] . j. i. skullerud _ et al_. , jhep * 0304 * , 047 ( 2003 ) [ 16 pages ] . m. s. bhagwat and p. c. tandy , phys . d * 70 * , 094039 ( 2004 ) [ 6 pages ] . n. i. kochelev , phys . b * 426 * , pp . 149 - 153 ( 1998 ) . d. diakonov , prog . phys . * 51 * , pp . 173 - 222 ( 2003 ) . d. ebert , r. n. faustov and v. o. galkin , eur . j. c * 47 * , pp . 745 - 755 ( 2006 ) . l. chang and c. d. roberts , `` tracing masses of ground - state light - quark mesons , '' arxiv:1104.4821 [ nucl - th ] . j. a. bicudo , j. e. f. ribeiro and r. fernandes , phys . c * 59 * , pp . 1107 - 1112 ( 1999 ) . f. jegerlehner and a. nyffeler , phys . rept . * 477 * , pp . 1 - 110 ( 2009 ) . t. goecke , c. s. fischer and r. williams , phys . d * 83 * , 094006 ( 2011 ) [ 14 pages ] . m. s. bhagwat _ et al_. , few body syst . * 40 * , pp . 209 - 235 ( 2007 ) k. nakamura _ et al . _ , j. phys . g * 37 * 075021 ( 2010 ) [ 1422 pages ] . r. alkofer , p. watson and h. weigel , phys . d * 65 * , 094026 ( 2002 ) [ 10 pages ] . i. c. clot and c. d. roberts , pos * lc2008 * , 047 ( 2008 ) [ 10 pages ] . h. l. l. roberts , l. chang , i. c. clot and c. d. roberts , few body syst . * 51 * , pp . 1 - 12 ( 2011 ) . m. a. pichowsky , s. walawalkar and s. capstick , phys . d * 60 * ( 1999 ) 054030 [ 21 pages ] . g. eichmann _ et al_. , phys . c * 77 * , 042202(r ) ( 2008 ) [ 5 pages ] . j. j. dudek , `` the lightest hybrid meson supermultiplet in qcd , '' arxiv:1106.5515 [ hep - ph ] . j. volmer _ et al . _ , phys . lett . * 86 * , pp . 1713 - 1716 ( 2001 ) . t. horn _ et al . _ , phys . lett . * 97 * , 192001 ( 2006 ) [ 4 pages ] . v. tadevosyan _ et al . _ , phys . c * 75 * , 055205 ( 2007 ) [ 9 pages ] . k. wijesooriya , p. e. reimer and r. j. holt , phys . c * 72 * , 065203 ( 2005 ) [ 5 pages ] . g. r. farrar and d. r. jackson , phys . lett . * 43 * , pp . 246 - 249 ( 1979 ) . a. v. efremov and a. v. radyushkin , phys . b * 94 * , pp . 245 - 250 ( 1980 ) . g. p. lepage and s. j. brodsky , phys . d * 22 * , pp . 2157 - 2198 ( 1980 ) . o. bowman _ et al_. , phys . d * 70 * , 034509 ( 2004 ) [ 4 pages ] . d. ebert , t. feldmann and h. reinhardt , phys . b * 388 * , pp . 154 - 160 ( 1996 ) . c. d. roberts , nucl . a * 605 * , pp . 475 - 495 ( 1996 ) . z. f. ezawa , nuovo cim . a * 23 * , pp . 271 - 290 ( 1974 ) . g. r. farrar and d. r. jackson , phys . lett . * 35 * , pp . 1416 - 1419 ( 1975 ) . b. aubert _ et al . _ , phys . d * 80 * , 052002 ( 2009 ) [ 16 pages ] . h. j. behrend _ et al . _ , z. phys . c * 49 * , pp . 401 - 410 ( 1991 ) . j. gronberg _ et al . _ , phys . d * 57 * , pp . 33 - 54 ( 1998 ) . p. maris and p. c. tandy , phys . c * 65 * , 045211 ( 2002 ) [ 13 pages ] . a. v. radyushkin , phys . d * 80 * , 094009 ( 2009 ) [ 9 pages ] . m. v. polyakov , jetp lett . * 90 * , pp . 228 - 231 ( 2009 ) . s. v. mikhailov and n. g. stefanis , mod . a * 24 * , pp . 2858 - 2867 ( 2009 ) . s. j. brodsky , f. g. cao and g. f. de teramond , phys . rev . * d84 * , 033001 ( 2011 ) [ 14 pages ] . a. p. bakulev , s. v. mikhailov , a. v. pimikov and n. g. stefanis , phys . rev . * d84 * , 034014 ( 2011 ) [ 11 pages ] . s. j. brodsky , f. g. cao and g. f. de teramond , `` meson transition form factors in light - front holographic qcd , '' arxiv:1105.3999 [ hep - ph ] . b. aubert _ et al . _ , phys . d * 74 * , 012002 ( 2006 ) [ 14 pages ] . j. badier _ et al . b * 93 * , pp . 354 - 356 ( 1980 ) . j. badier _ et al . _ [ na3 collaboration ] , z. phys . c * 18 * , pp . 281 - 287 ( 1983 ) . b. betev _ et al . _ [ na10 collaboration ] , z. phys . c * 28 * , pp . 15 - 22 ( 1985 ) . j. s. conway _ et al . _ , phys . d * 39 * , pp . 92 - 122 ( 1989 ) . c. j. burden , c. d. roberts and m. j. thomson , phys . b * 371 * , pp . 163 - 168 ( 1996 ) . b. el - bennich , m. a. ivanov and c. d. roberts , phys . c * 83 * , 025205 ( 2011 ) [ 5 pages ] . m. aicher , a. schafer and w. vogelsang , phys . lett . * 105 * , 252003 ( 2010 ) [ 4 pages ] . p. j. sutton , a. d. martin , r. g. roberts and w. j. stirling , phys . d * 45 * , pp . 2349 - 2359 ( 1992 ) . m. gluck , e. reya and a. vogt , eur . j. c * 5 * , pp . 461 - 470 ( 1998 ) . l. chang and c. d. roberts , aip conf . proc . * 1261 * , pp . 25 - 30 ( 2010 ) . p. bicudo , `` proof of the weinberg theorem for chiral quark models , '' arxiv : nucl - th/0110052 . p. bicudo _ et al_. , phys . d * 65 * , 076008 ( 2002 ) [ 8 pages ] . g. eichmann _ et al_. , phys . c * 79 * , 012202(r ) ( 2009 ) [ 5 pages ] . g. eichmann , phys . rev . * d84 * , 014014 ( 2011 ) . v. mader , g. eichmann , m. blank and a. krassnigg , phys . rev . * d84 * , 034012 ( 2011 ) . r. t. cahill , c. d. roberts and j. praschifka , austral . j. phys . * 42 * , pp . 129 - 145 ( 1989 ) . r. t. cahill , c. d. roberts and j. praschifka , phys . d * 36 * , pp . 2804 - 2812 ( 1987 ) . p. maris , few body syst . * 32 * , pp . 41 - 52 ( 2002 ) . p. maris , few body syst . * 35 * , pp . 117 - 127 ( 2004 ) . i. c. clot _ et al_. , few body syst . * 42 * , pp . 91 - 113 ( 2008 ) . l. chang and c. d. roberts , `` hadron physics : the essence of matter , '' arxiv:1003.5006 [ nucl - th ] . h. l. l. roberts , l. chang , i. c. clot and c. d. roberts , `` exposing the dressed quark s mass , '' in _ exclusive reactions at high momentum transfer iv _ , ed . a. radyushkin ( world scientific , singapore , 2011 ) pp . 201 - 211 , proceedings of the `` 4th workshop on exclusive reactions at high momentum transfer , '' thomas jefferson national accelerator facility newport news , virginia , 18 - 21 may 2010 , arxiv:1007.3566 [ nucl - th ] l. chang , i. c. clot , c. d. roberts , h. l. l. roberts , aip conf . proc . * 1354 * , pp . 110 - 117 ( 2011 ) . i. c. clot , c. d. roberts and d. j. wilson , `` baryon properties from continuum - qcd , '' arxiv:1103.2432 [ nucl - th ] . i. aznauryan _ et al . _ , `` theory support for the excited baryon program at the jlab 12- gev upgrade , '' arxiv:0907.1901 [ nucl - th ] . m. r. pennington , aip conf . proc . * 1343 * , pp . 63 - 68 ( 2011 ) . m. blank , `` properties of quarks and mesons in the dyson - schwinger / bethe - salpeter approach , '' arxiv:1106.4843 [ hep - ph ] . m. he , j. f. li , w. m. sun and h. s. zong , phys . d * 79 * , 036001 ( 2009 ) [ 7 pages ] . t. klhn _ et al_. , phys . c * 82 * , 035801 ( 2010 ) [ 5 pages ] . h. li , x. l. luo , y. jiang and h. s. zong , phys . d * 83 * , 025012 ( 2011 ) [ 7 pages ] . p. maris , c. d. roberts , s. m. schmidt and p. c. tandy , phys . c * 63 * , 025202 ( 2001 ) [ 12 pages ] . a. hll , p. maris and c. d. roberts , phys . c * 59 * , pp . 1751 - 1755 ( 1999 ) c. s. fischer and j. a. mueller , `` on critical scaling at the qcd @xmath440 chiral phase transition , '' arxiv:1106.2700 [ hep - ph ] . Abstract:
[ "we provide a brief review of recent progress in the study of mesons using qcd s dyson - schwinger equations . along the way we touch on aspects of confinement and dynamical chiral symmetry breaking but in the main focus upon : exact results for pseudoscalar mesons , including aspects of the @xmath0-@xmath1 problem ; a realisation that the so - called vacuum condensates are actually an intrinsic , localised property of hadrons ; an essentially nonperturbative procedure for constructing a symmetry - preserving bethe - salpeter kernel , which has enabled a demonstration that dressed - quarks possess momentum - dependent anomalous chromo- and electromagnetic moments that are large at infrared momenta , and resolution of a longstanding problem in understanding the mass - splitting between @xmath2- and @xmath3-mesons such that they are now readily seen to be parity partners in the meson spectrum ; features of electromagnetic form factors connected with charged and neutral pions ; and computation and explanation of valence - quark distribution functions in pseudoscalar mesons . we argue that in solving qcd , a constructive feedback between theory and extant and forthcoming experiments will enable constraints to be placed on the infrared behaviour of qcd s @xmath4-function , the nonperturbative quantity at the core of hadron physics ." ]
15,651
15,651
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the modern effective field theory ( eft ) analysis of the nn interaction using chiral symmetry as a constraint has a recent but prolific history @xcite ( for comprehensive reviews see e.g. ref . most theoretical setups are invariably based on a perturbative determination of the chiral potential @xcite and the subsequent solution of the scattering problem @xcite . actually , the theory encounters many problems in the low partial waves and in particular in the @xmath2waves ( see however ref . @xcite for a more optimistic view ) . indeed , there is at present an ongoing debate on how an eft program should be sensibly implemented within the nn context and so far no consensus has been achieved ( see e.g. @xcite ) . the discussion is concerned with the issue of renormalization vs. finite cutoffs , a priori ( power counting ) vs. a posteriori error estimates or the applicability of perturbation theory both on a purely short distance theory or around some non - perturbative distorted waves . at the moment , it seems fairly clear that an eft scheme with a cutoff - independent and systematic perturbative power counting for the s - matrix ( the so - called ksw counting ) fails @xcite . on the other hand , the original eft inspired scheme @xcite ( the so - called weinberg counting ) has recently been shown to produce many results which turn out to be strongly cutoff dependent @xcite and hence to be incompatible with renormalizability . thus , some acceptable compromise must be made . actually , the chosen approach between this dichotomy depends strongly on the pursued goals and it is fair to say that any choice has both advantages and disadvantages . in any case , the reason for both failures can be traced back to the nature of the long - distance chiral potentials ; while pion - exchange potentials fall off exponentially at long distances they include strong power - law singularities at short distances . those singularities become significant already at distances comparable with the smallest de broglie wavelength probed in nn scattering below pion production threshold . obviously , any development of nn interactions based on chiral dynamics will presumably require a deeper understanding and proper interpretation of the peculiarities of these highly singular chiral potentials . although singular potentials where first analyzed many years ago @xcite ( for an early review see e.g. @xcite and for a more updated view within an eft context see @xcite ) , their short distance singular character within the nn interaction has seriously been faced more recently within a renormalization context for the one - pion exchange ( ope ) potential @xcite and the two - pion exchange ( tpe ) potential @xcite . in the np scattering problem the @xmath0 channel is very special since the scattering length is unnaturally large as compared to the range of the strong interaction , @xmath3 . in fact , even at zero energy the wave function probes relatively short distance components of the chiral potential @xcite \ ] ] where @xmath4 is the zero energy wave function , fulfilling the asymptotic condition @xmath5 . most of the integrand is located in the region around @xmath6 which is in between ope and tpe ranges . moreover , the low energy theorem of ref . @xcite allows to write @xmath7 which in the extreme limit @xmath8 yields @xmath9 . numerically it is found that @xmath10 is far more dependent than @xmath11 and @xmath12 when being evaluated at lo , nlo and nnlo . ] . higher energies become even more sensitive to short distance interactions . consequently , this channel looks like an ideal place to learn about the size of the most relevant short range corrections to the nn force in the elastic scattering region . actually , in the @xmath0 channel , most eft inspired schemes yield at leading order ( lo ) ( which consists of ope plus a nonderivative counterterm ) an almost constant phase of about @xmath13 around @xmath14 , and an effective range of @xmath15 . on the other hand , most determinations from partial wave analysis @xcite and high quality potential models @xcite yield an almost vanishing phase at this center - of - mass ( cm ) momentum while the experimental effective range is about twice the ope value , @xmath16 . . ] it is quite unbelievable that such large changes can be reliably accommodated by perturbation theory starting from this lo result despite previous unsuccessful attempts treating ope and tpe perturbatively @xcite . actually , for the singlet channel case , short distance components are enhanced due to the large value of the scattering length and the weakness of the ope interaction in this channel . this is why tpe contributions have been treated with more success in a non - perturbative fashion @xcite . despite phenomenological agreement with the data , the inclusion of finite cutoffs suggests that there might be some regulator dependence in those calculations . in a series of recent papers @xcite , two of us ( m.p.v . and e.r.a . ) have proposed not only to iterate but also to renormalize to all orders the nn chiral potential within a long distance expansion . by allowing the minimal number of counterterms to yield a finite result , long - distance regulator - independent correlations are established . in practice , the potential must be computed within some power counting scheme . while the potential is used within weinberg s power counting to lo , next - to - leading order ( nlo ) , and next - to - next - to - leading order ( n2lo ) , we only allow for those counterterms which yield a finite and unique scattering amplitude . in the @xmath0 np channel a single energy and momentum independent counterterm @xmath17 is considered which is determined by adjusting the physical scattering length . in the derivation of this result the mathematical requirements of completeness and self - adjointness for the renormalized quantum mechanical problem for a local chiral potential play a decisive role . this surprising result is in contrast to the standard weinberg counting where an additional counterterm @xmath18 is included already at nlo . this @xmath18 counterterm could , in fact , be determined by fitting the experimental value of the effective range ; the physics of @xmath18 is to provide a short distance contribution to the effective range in addition to the contribution from the known long distance chiral potential . within this context it is remarkable that according to ref . @xcite , where such a short distance contribution vanishes ( or equivalently @xmath19 when the cut - off is removed ) , rather accurate values are _ predicted _ yielding @xmath20 and @xmath21 _ after renormalization_. this latter value is less than @xmath22 larger than the experimentally accepted value and it suggests that most of the effective range is saturated by n2lo tpe contributions and calls for pinning down the remaining discrepancy . this trend to convergence and agreement is also shared by higher order slope parameters in the effective range expansion without strong need of specific counterterms although there is still room for improvement . motivated by this encouraging result , one goal of the present paper is to analyze the size of the next - to - next - to - next - to - leading order ( n3lo ) corrections to the results found in @xcite . the calculations in ref . @xcite exploit explicitly the local character of the chiral potential by conducting the calculations in coordinate space which makes the analysis more transparent . many results , in particular the conditions under which a renormalized limit exists , can be established a priori analytically . moreover , the highly oscillatory character of wave functions at short distances is treated numerically using efficient adaptive - step differential equations techniques . this situation contrasts with momentum space calculations where , with the exception of the pion - less theory , there is a paucity of analytical results , and one must mostly rely on numerical methods . moreover , the existence of a renormalized limit is not obvious a priori and one may have to resort to some trial and error to search for counterterms . finally , renormalization conditions are most naturally formulated at zero energy for which the momentum space treatment may be challenging , at times . of course , besides these technical issues , there is no fundamental difference between proceeding in momentum or coordinate space , particularly _ after _ renormalization , provided the same renormalization conditions are specified , since disparate regulators stemming from either space are effectively removed . indeed , we will check agreement for the phase - shifts determined in different spaces whenever such a comparison becomes possible . this equivalence is in itself a good motivation for renormalization . however , at n3lo some unavoidable non - localities appear in the chiral long distance potential . although they could be treated in configuration space , we adopt here a momentum space treatment . this will also allow us to answer an intriguing question which was left open in the coordinate space analysis of previous works @xcite , namely , the role played by the conventional momentum - polynomial representations of the short distance interaction used in most calculations @xcite in the renormalization problem . more specifically , ref . @xcite showed that taking @xmath19 was consistent , and a regularization scheme exists where a fixed @xmath18 was irrelevant , but could not discriminate whether @xmath23 was inconsistent as far as it was readjusted to the effective range parameter for any cut - off value . , becomes irrelevant in the limit @xmath24 ( see below ) . ] in this regard , the present paper yields a definite answer making the surprising agreement of the effective range found in ref . @xcite an inevitable mathematical consequence of renormalization . the paper is organized as follows . the problem is stated in sec . [ sec : renorm - prob ] where a general overview of the renormalization problem is given both in momentum as well as coordinate space . in sec . [ sec : mom - space ] , we particularize the momentum space formulation of the scattering problem with counterterms for the @xmath0 channel within a sharp three - momentum cutoff scheme . likewise , in sec . [ sec : coor - space ] we proceed similarly in the coordinate space formulation within a boundary condition regularization with a short distance cutoff @xmath25 . in sec . [ sec : coor - mom ] , we discuss some features of both coordinate and momentum space formulations in the pion - less theory and try to connect the high momentum cutoff @xmath26 with the short distance radial cutoff @xmath25 . this allows a one - to - one mapping of counterterms in both spaces which will prove useful later on in the pion - full theory . the identification between the sharp momentum cutoff and the short distance radius found in the pion - less theory is discussed further in appendix [ sec : nyquist ] in the presence of a long distance potential in the light of the nyquist theorem . in sec . [ sec : n3lo ] , we come to the central discussion on n3lo corrections to the phase shifts when the scattering amplitude is renormalized with only one short distance counterterm . a wider perspective is achieved by further considering the role of explicit @xmath1-excitations in intermediate states and the subsequent one - counterterm renormalization of the scattering amplitude . we also discuss the role of three pion exchange as well as how the results depend on the renormalization scheme used to compute the potential based on cut - off independent counterterms . the mathematical justification for using just one counterterm is provided in sec . [ sec : weinberg ] where the standard weinberg scheme is pursued both in momentum and coordinate space at nlo and n2lo and shown to potentially have some problems . finally , in sec . [ sec : conc ] , we summarize our main points . let us define the scope and goals of the present work . the standard non - perturbative formulation of the renormalization problem starts with an effective lagrangian or hamiltonian ( see e.g. @xcite and @xcite and references therein ) , from which a certain set of irreducible feynman diagrams ( usually up to a certain order ) is calculated . these irreducible diagrams are defined to represent a potential @xmath27 . the potential is then inserted into a scattering equation where it is iterated infinitely many times or , in other words , re - summed non - perturbatively . in the cm frame , where the np kinetic energy is given by @xmath28 , with @xmath29 , the scattering process is governed by the lippmann - schwinger equation @xmath30 with @xmath27 the potential operator and @xmath31 the resolvent of the free hamiltonian . the outgoing boundary condition corresponds to @xmath32 . using the normalization @xmath33 one has @xmath34 here @xmath26 means a generic regulator and represents the scale below which all physical effects are taken into account _ explicitly_. the degrees of freedom which are above @xmath26 are taken into account _ implicitly _ by including a suitable cutoff dependence in the potential . the precise equation governing this cutoff dependence was described and studied in some detail in ref . @xcite with particular emphasis on infrared fixed points . we will analyze the cutoff dependence below focusing on the ultraviolet aspects of the interaction . motivated by the low energy nature of the effective theory , the potential is usually separated into short and long distance components in an _ additive _ form @xmath35 where the long distance contribution is usually given by successive pion exchanges @xmath36 and the short distance component is characterized by a power series expansion in momentum @xmath37 where for simplicity we assume a spin singlet channel . note that @xmath17 and @xmath18 contribute to s - waves while @xmath38 contributes to p - waves , and so on . one should face the fact that , although the decomposition given by eq . ( [ eq : long - short ] ) is perturbatively motivated and seems quite natural , the additivity between short and long range forces is actually an _ assumption _ which has important consequences , as we will see . ) does not foresee for instance terms of the form @xmath39 , i.e. terms which are not polynomial but influence the renormalization process . of course , once additivity is relaxed there are many possible representations , in particular for the short distance components . ] in principle , for a given regularization scheme characterized by a cutoff @xmath26 , the counterterms @xmath17 , @xmath38 , @xmath18 and so on are determined by fixing some observables . one naturally expects that the number of renormalization conditions coincides with the number of counterterms in a way that all renormalization conditions are fully uncorrelated . the statement of uv - renormalizability is that such a procedure becomes always possible when the cutoff @xmath26 is removed by taking the limit @xmath24 . this may not be the case as there may appear redundant contributions ( see the discussion below in sec . [ sec : coor - mom ] ) meaning that one counterterm or counterterm combination can take any value . another possible situation is just the opposite ; one may want to impose more renormalization conditions than possible . in this case some counterterms or counterterm combinations are forbidden . rather than being intricate mathematical pastimes , these features have already been investigated recently @xcite for large cutoffs casting some doubt on the regulator independence of the original proposal @xcite . even if one admits generically eq . ( [ eq : long - short ] ) as well as eq . ( [ eq : long ] ) and eq . ( [ eq : short ] ) , it is not obvious how many terms should be considered and whether there is a clear way of defining a convergence criterium or identifying a convergence pattern . it is fairly clear that , on physical grounds , one should consider an expansion of the potential that starts at long distance and decreases in range as the number of exchanged particles increases . note , however , that , while ope is well - defined , the general form of the tpe potential is not uniquely determined . within this context , one of the main attractive features of the eft approach has been the definition of a power counting scheme which provides a hierarchy and an _ a priori _ correlation between long and short range physics . in the present paper , we will assume weinberg power counting @xcite ( see below for a more precise definition ) , where the long distance potential is determined in a dimensional power expansion . the long distance component @xmath40 is obtained by particle exchanges and , in some simple cases , depends only on the momentum transfer channel . ] . in such a case , if we formally take a fourier transformation of the long distance potential @xmath41 and take the limit @xmath42 one has the standard schrdinger equation in coordinate space , @xmath43 where the coordinate space potential is @xmath44 + \dots \ , \ , . \label{eq : pot - coor}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the whole discussion , which has been carried on for years now , concerns the precise meaning of these delta and derivatives of delta interactions , particularly when a long distance potential is added to the short distance one . a crucial finding of the present paper based on a direct analysis in momentum space is that _ non - perturbative renormalization imposes restrictions _ on the number of terms and form of the short distance potential which depend also on the particular long distance potential . some of these restrictions were discussed in previous works @xcite . remarkably these new renormalizability restrictions were conjectured in coordinate space in ref . @xcite for the @xmath0 channel based on self - adjointness and completeness of states and apply to the tpe potential ; a single @xmath45 counterterm is allowed while two counterterms , @xmath45 and @xmath46 , are forbidden . in the @xmath0 channel the scattering process is governed by the lippmann - schwinger equation @xmath47 where @xmath48 and @xmath49 are the scattering amplitude and the potential matrix elements , respectively , between off - shell momentum states @xmath50 and @xmath51 in that channel and the sharp three - momentum cutoff @xmath26 represents the scale below which all physical effects are taken into account _ explicitly_. from the on - shell scattering amplitude the phase shift can be readily obtained @xmath52 the short range character of the nuclear force implies that at low energies one has the effective range expansion ( ere ) @xmath53 \nonumber \\ & = & -\frac1{\alpha_0 } + \frac12 r_0 p^2 + v_2 p^4 + v_3 p^6 + \dots \label{eq : ere}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath54 is the scattering length , @xmath55 the effective range and @xmath56 , @xmath57 etc . are slope parameters . in the @xmath0 channel , the potential is decomposed as the sum of short and long range pieces @xmath58 in the standard weinberg counting , the short distance contribution is written as follows @xmath59 where the counting is related to the order of the momentum which appears explicitly . the long distance component of the potential is taken to be the sum of explicit pion exchanges @xmath60 where @xcite @xmath61 using dimensional power counting . ideally , one should determine the physically relevant long range regulator independent correlations , i.e. , long distance effects of similar range . this would amount to consider _ all _ @xmath62 exchange effects on the same footing , since they yield a long distance suppression @xmath63 modulo power corrections . at present , the only way how these long distance potentials can be systematically computed is by dimensional power counting in perturbation theory , as represented schematically in eqs . ( [ eq : potpi ] ) and ( [ eq:1pi2pi3pi ] ) . in the standard weinberg counting one has @xmath64 note that this counting involves both unknown short - distance physics and chiral long - distance physics in a _ uncorrelated way_. note also that there is no first order contribution and that there is no third order contribution to the short distance potential . regarding eq . ( [ eq : long - short-1s0 ] ) one should stress that the separation between long and short range contributions to the potential is not unique . in fact , there is a polynomial ambiguity in the long range part which can freely be transferred to the short distance contribution . however , the non - polynomial part is unambiguous as it is directly related to the left hand cut of the partial wave amplitude which for @xmath65 exchange is located at @xmath66 but presumably becomes incomplete for @xmath67 . for any non - vanishing radius ( see e.g. the discussion in ref . @xcite . ) ] in coordinate space , the problem in the @xmath0 channel is formulated as follows @xcite . assuming a _ local _ long distance potential @xmath68 one has to solve the schrdinger equation @xmath69 where @xmath70 is the reduced potential ( in fact , the fourier transformation of @xmath71 ) and @xmath72 the reduced wave function for an s - wave state . here @xmath25 is the short distance cutoff and the reduced wave function is subject to the boundary condition at @xmath73 and the standard long distance free particle behaviour @xmath74 where @xmath75 is the short distance phase - shift encoding the physics for @xmath76 . in the case of a vanishing long range potential @xmath77 the phase shift is given by @xmath78 . on the other hand , if we take @xmath79 we get a standard problem with a hard core boundary condition , @xmath80 which for @xmath81 becomes the standard regular solution at the origin . at low energies both the _ full _ phase - shift @xmath82 and the _ short distance _ phase - shift @xmath83 can be described by some low energy approximation , like e.g. , an effective range expansion , @xmath84 where @xmath85 is the short range scattering length , @xmath86 the short range effective range , and @xmath54 and @xmath55 the full ones for a further discussion on this . ] . if we also make an expansion at low energies of the reduced wave function @xmath87 we get the hierarchy of equations @xmath88 and @xmath89 and so on . the standard way to proceed would be to integrate the equations for @xmath90 , @xmath91 , etc . from infinity downwards , with a known value of @xmath92 , using eq . ( [ eq : u0 ] ) to obtain @xmath93 and then one can use eq.([eq : sch_k ] ) together with eq . ( [ eq : bc_sch ] ) and eq . ( [ eq : ere_short ] ) to compute @xmath94 for any energy with a given truncated boundary condition . this procedure provides by construction the low energy parameters we started with and takes into account that the long range potential determines the form of the wave function at long distances . the only parameter in the procedure is the short distance radius @xmath25 , which is eventually removed by taking the limit @xmath95 . one should mention at this point that the coordinate space is particularly suited for the case of local long distance potentials , but the renormalization with an arbitrary number of countertersm requires an _ energy dependent _ but real boundary condition at short distances which eventually violates self - adjointness . on the other hand , the momentum space formulation allows the discussion of nonlocal long distance potentials and the renormalization is done in terms of a _ momentum dependent _ short distance polynomial potential . although this looks like a self - adjoint problem , we will see that in this formulation the counterterms may in fact become complex . the renormalization of the pion - less theory , i.e. , a set of pure contact interactions , has been treated with great detail in the literature @xcite although without much consideration on how this problem might be embedded into the wider and certainly more realistic situation where the finite range and short distance singular chiral nn potentials are present . in fact , much of the understanding of non - perturbative renormalization within the modern nn context has been tailored after those and further studies based on the non - singular ope singlet @xmath0 potential @xcite plus the standard perturbative experience . in previous @xcite and in the present work , we pursue exactly the opposite goal : we will only consider renormalization procedures which can directly be implemented in the _ presence _ of long distance potentials since , after all , contact nn interactions are always assumed to approximate truly finite range interactions in the long wavelength limit . thus , it is useful to review here those developments with an eye on the new ingredients which appear in the non - perturbative renormalization of singular pion exchange potentials as analyzed in later sections . in addition , the deduced running of the counterterms in the contact theory in the infrared domain serves as a useful starting point when the long distance pion exchange potential is switched on . finally , we will also discuss the size of finite cutoff corrections to the renormalized result depending both on the particular regularization as well as the corresponding representation of the short distance physics . although the previously described momentum space framework has extensively been used in the past to describe successfully the data @xcite with a _ finite cutoff _ @xmath96 it is worth emphasizing some puzzling features regarding the off - shell ambiguities of the short distance potential when finite range corrections , encoded in the @xmath18 , @xmath97 etc . counterterms , are included . in momentum space , the pion - less theory corresponds to taking @xmath98 . in such a case the lippmann - schwinger equation reduces to a simple algebraic equation @xcite . at very small values of the cutoff @xmath99 , the long range part of the potential may be neglected since they scale with powers of momentum and a simple contact theory of the form of eq . ( [ eq : vs(k , k ) ] ) may be used . for instance , when @xmath100 , the lippmann - schwinger equation ( lse ) may be directly solved . using the basic integral corresponds to making the replacement @xmath101 . in dimensional regularization ( minimal subtraction scheme ) the integral is just the unitarity piece , @xmath102 . ] @xmath103 for a sharp momentum cutoff @xmath26 and @xmath104 , one obtains for the phase shifts @xmath105 at zero energy , @xmath106 and , thus , the running of @xmath17 is given by @xmath107 in this case , the phase shift is given by @xmath108 which corresponds to an ere with @xmath109 in the limit @xmath24 . note that finite cutoff corrections scale as @xmath110 . this indicates a relatively slow convergence towards the infinite cutoff limit and hence that finite cutoff effects are quantitatively important and might even become a parameter of the theory . actually , one might determine @xmath26 by fixing the effective range from the first of eq . ( [ eq : pcotdmom0 ] ) , @xmath111 , yielding the accurate numerical value @xmath112 . in this case , this particular three - momentum regularization method becomes itself a model , since we have no control on the remainder . in any case , it is straightforward to check that for any finite cutoff there is no off - shellness : @xmath113 . the running given by eq . ( [ eq : c0-short ] ) must be used for _ any _ cutoff @xmath26 if we want to renormalize in the end . however , thinking of the more general case where finite range corrections are relevant such a running is only reliable for very small cutoffs @xmath114 . if we consider also a @xmath115 coefficient in the potential , the corresponding lse can be solved with the ansatz @xmath116 which yields a set of three linear equations for @xmath117 , @xmath118 and @xmath119 . after some algebraic manipulation , the final result for the phase shift can then be written in the form @xmath120 matching at low energies to the ere , eq . ( [ eq : ere ] ) , we get the running of @xmath17 and @xmath18 @xmath121 the first equation allows to eliminate uniquely @xmath17 in favour of @xmath54 and @xmath18 , but as we see there are two branches for the solutions . however , we choose the branch for which @xmath18 decouples in the infrared domain , i.e. fulfills @xmath122 for @xmath123 . in fact , at small cutoffs , one gets for this branch @xmath124 the factor @xmath125 appearing in the small cutoff expansion for @xmath17 differs already from the coefficient in the case @xmath19 . eliminating @xmath17 and @xmath18 in favour of @xmath54 and @xmath55 , the phase shift becomes @xmath126 note that the finite cutoff corrections are , after fixing @xmath55 , again @xmath127 . so , fixing more low energy constants in the contact theory does not necessarily imply a stronger short distance insensitivity , as one might have naturally expected . in other words , the inclusion of a higher dimensional operator such as @xmath18 does not improve the ultraviolet limit , at least in the polynomial representation given by eq . ( [ eq : vs(k , k ) ] ) . in sec . [ sec : n3lo ] we will show , however , that with just one counterterm @xmath17 the inclusion of pion exchange long distance contributions generates a much faster convergence towards the renormalized limit as anticipated in refs . @xcite ( see also ref . @xcite for a quantitative estimate ) . in sec . [ sec : weinberg ] we will also show that when a @xmath128 counterterm is added this scaling behaviour is not only broken but also the phase shift fails to converge in the limit @xmath129 . thus , we see that one can establish a one - to - one mapping between the counterterms @xmath17 , @xmath18 and the threshold parameters @xmath54 and @xmath55 . nevertheless , this is done at the expense of operator mixing , i.e. , both @xmath17 and @xmath18 are intertwined to determine both the scattering length and the effective range . in other words the cutoff dependence of @xmath130 is different depending on the presence of @xmath18 . as we have seen this is not a problem since for small cutoffs we expect the running of @xmath17 to be fully independent of @xmath18 and hence on @xmath55 . however , unlike the one counterterm case , where @xmath19 , the solutions of eq . ( [ eq : c0-c2 ] ) may become complex when @xmath131 for the physical @xmath0 threshold parameters this happens already for @xmath132 ( the other two roots are complex ) . above this critical value the potential violates self - adjointness . for @xmath133 one has @xmath134 . thus , the cutoff can only be fully removed with a self - adjoint short distance potential if @xmath135 . this is consistent with the violation of the wigner causality condition reported in @xcite . note that the violation of self - adjointness is very peculiar since once @xmath17 and @xmath18 have been eliminated the phase - shift ( [ eq : ps - lambda ] ) remains real between off - shell momentum states , is violated , since the schwartz s reflection principle fails @xmath136^\dagger \neq t ( e-{\rm i } 0^+ ) $ ] . this would also have far reaching consequences for the three body problem , since three body unitarity rests on two - body off - shell unitarity and self - adjointness of three body forces . ] . one feature in the theory with two counterterms @xmath17 and @xmath18 is that the off - shell @xmath137matrix becomes on - shell only in the infinite cutoff limit , @xmath138 this is unlike the theory with one counterterm @xmath17 where there is no off - shellness at any cutoff . thus , finite cutoff effects are also a measure of the off - shellness in this particular problem . this will have important consequences in sec . [ sec : weinberg ] when attempting to extend the theory with two counterterms in the presence of the long distance pion exchange potentials since the off - shellness of the short distance contribution of the potential becomes an issue in the limit @xmath24 . the situation changes qualitatively when the fourth order corrections depending on two counterterms @xmath139 and @xmath140 are considered . obviously , we can not fix both @xmath139 and @xmath140 _ simultaneously _ by fixing the slope parameter @xmath56 of the effective range expansion , eq . ( [ eq : ere ] ) . clearly , one expects some parameter redundancy between @xmath139 and @xmath140 or else an inconsistency would arise since a sixth order parameter in the effective range expansion @xmath57 should be fixed . the situation worsens if higher orders in the momentum expansion are considered due to a rapid proliferation of counterterms while there is only one more threshold parameter for each additional order in the expansion . this required parameter redundancy is actually a necessary condition for consistency which is manifestly fulfilled within dimensional regularization but not in the three - momentum cutoff method . moreover , it was realized some time ago @xcite that the finite cutoff regularization and dimensional regularizarion in the minimal subtraction scheme yielded _ different _ renormalized amplitudes for a _ truncated _ potential . this non - uniqueness in the result due to a different regularization happens when a non - vanishing @xmath18 counterterm is considered . in any case , the dimensional regularization scheme has never been extended to include the long range part of the tpe potential which usually appear in the present nn context . thus , for the momentum space cutoffs which have been implemented in practice the short distance representation is somewhat inconsistent at least for a finite value of the cutoff @xmath26 . alternatively , one may choose an energy dependent representation of the short distance physics as @xmath141 in this case the correspondence between counterterms and threshold parameters @xmath54,@xmath55 , @xmath56 , etc . is exactly one - to - one , and the parameter redundancy is manifest , since the on shell @xmath142-matrix depends only on the on - shell potential . actually , under dimensional regularization the representations of the potential eq . ( [ eq : vs(k , k ) ] ) and eq . ( [ eq : vs(p ) ] ) yield the same scattering amplitude . although this on - shell equivalence is certainly desirable it is also unnatural , if the long distance potential is energy independent . we will nevertheless analyze such a situation in the next subsection in coordinate space . the previous discussion highlights the kind of undesirable but inherent off - shell ambiguities which arise when finite range corrections are included in the short distance potential is considered . it vanishes on the mass shell @xmath143 but nonetheless generates non trivial on shell scattering for the three - momentum cutoff . ] . in our view these are unphysical ambiguities which have nothing to do with the unambiguous off - shell dependence of the long distance potential . of course , one way to get rid of the ambiguities is to take the limit @xmath129 which corresponds to the case where a truly zero range theory is approached . however , even for a finite cutoff there is a case where one is free from the ambiguities , namely when the short distance potential is _ both _ energy and momentum independent for s - wave scattering @xmath144 the key point is that we allow only this counterterm to be cutoff dependent and real , as required by self - adjointness . of course , the discussion above for the contact theory suggests the benefits of using just one @xmath17 counterterm but does not exactly provide a proof that one _ must _ take further counterterms such as @xmath18 to zero . the extension of this analysis to the case of singular chiral potentials in sec . [ sec : weinberg ] will yield the definite conclusion that renormalizability is indeed equivalent to take @xmath19 . the previous renormalization scheme is the momentum space version corresponding to the coordinate space renormalization adopted in a previous work by two of us ( mpv and era ) @xcite . actually , in the pure contact theory , we can relate the renormalization constant with the momentum space wave function explicitly . at large values of the short distance cutoff @xmath25 , the zero energy wave function reads , @xmath145 thus , the following relation holds @xmath146 comparing with eq . ( [ eq : c0-short ] ) , we get @xmath147 where the momentum cutoff @xmath26 and the short distance cutoff @xmath25 are related by the equation @xmath148 which is nothing but an uncertainty principle relation between cutoffs . ] . note that for the standard regular solution @xmath149 one has a vanishing counterterm @xmath150 . in contrast , @xmath151 for the irregular solution . in the case of the singular attractive potentials the solution is regular but highly oscillatory and the @xmath130 takes all possible values for @xmath152 . a more detailed discussion on these issues can be seen in refs . of course , strictly speaking both eq . ( [ eq : c0-equiv ] ) and eq . ( [ eq : lambda - rc ] ) are based on a zero energy state , and in the finite energy case we will assume these relations having the limit @xmath152 or @xmath42 in mind . let us now deal with finite energy scattering states . since there is no potential , @xmath153 , for @xmath154 we have the free wave solution @xmath155 in the theory with one counterterm , we fix the scattering length @xmath54 by using the zero energy wave function and matching at @xmath73 so we get @xmath156 yielding @xmath157 and thus @xmath158 this is in qualitative agreement with the momentum space result when the cutoff is being removed , eq . ( [ eq : pcotdmom0 ] ) and , as we can see , the approach to the renormalized value is similar if the identification @xmath159 is made . note further that since the boundary condition is energy independent the problem is self - adjoint and hence orthogonality between different energy states is guaranteed . the theory with two counterterms where both @xmath54 and @xmath55 are fixed to their experimental values opens up a new possibility , already envisaged in ref . @xcite , related to the non - uniqueness of the result both for a finite cutoff as well as for the renormalized phase - shift . as pointed out above , this non - uniqueness was noted first in momentum space ref . @xcite when using a finite three dimensional cutoff or dimensional regularizarion ( minimal subtraction ) . remarkably , within the boundary condition regularization we will be able to identify both cases as different short distance representations . actually , when fixing @xmath54 and @xmath55 we are led to @xmath160 where @xmath161 and @xmath162 are defined in sec . [ sec : coor - space ] . note that now self - adjointness is violated from the beginning due to the energy dependence of the boudary condition . within the second order approximation in the energy the neglected terms are @xmath163 , so _ any _ representation compatible to this order might in principle be considered as equally suitable . the close similarity to a pad approximant suggests to compare the following three possibilities for illustration purposes @xmath164 \ , , \nonumber \\ d_p^{\rm iii } & = & \frac{u_0 ' ( r_c)^2}{u_0 ( r_c ) u_0'(r_c ) + p^2 \left [ u_2 ( r_c)u_0'(r_c ) - u_0 ( r_c ) u_2 ' ( r_c ) \right ] } \ , , \nonumber \\ \label{eq : d_p's}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and study what happens as the cutoff is removed , @xmath152 . note that all three cases possess _ by construction _ the same scattering length @xmath54 and effective range @xmath55 and no potential for @xmath165 . straightforward calculation yields @xmath166 as we see , all three representations provide the _ same _ threshold parameters , but _ do not _ yield identical renormalized amplitude for finite energy . actually , cases i and ii coincide with the three - dimensional cutoff regularization method ( see sec . [ sec : mom - pion - less ] ) , whereas case iii corresponds to dimensional regularization ( ms ) . moreover , the finite cutoff corrections to the renormalized result are , generally , @xmath167 while the rational representation yields corrections @xmath168 . these observations survive at higher orders when @xmath56 , @xmath57 , etc . threshold parameters are further taken into account . this indicates that not all short distance representations are equally `` soft '' in the uv - cutoff . the generalization of these results to the case of singular tpe chiral potentials was studied in ref . @xcite and will be also re - analyzed in sec . [ sec : weinberg ] while discussing the consistency of the standard weinberg s power counting . in any case , when finite range corrections are considered within the boundary condition regularization , there are two possible renormalized solutions depending on the particular parameterization of short distance physics . a nice feature of this regularization is that they can be identified with similar results found already in the momentum space analysis of ref . @xcite when confronting three - momentum cut - off and dimensional regularization . we note also here that no ambiguity arises when the boundary condition is assumed to be energy independent , in which case self - adjointness is guaranteed . the study of the contact theory in sec . [ sec : coor - mom ] provides suggestive arguments why it is highly desirable to carry out a regularization with a single counterterm in the @xmath0 channel by adjusting it to the physical scattering length for any cutoff value . in this section we want to extend that study when the long distance chiral potential organized according to weinberg power counting enters the game and the cutoff is removed . by taking the cutoff to infinity , we are actually assuming that all degrees of freedom not included in the present calculation become infinitely heavy . this way we expect to learn about missing physics in a _ model _ and _ regularization _ independent fashion . the traditional strategy of adjusting an increasing number of counterterms may obscure the analysis . in other words , by using this minimal number of counterterms , we try not to mock up what might be still missing in the long range description . in this context there is of course the question of convergence or cutoff insensitivity of the phase shift , when @xmath42 , provided we keep at any rate the scattering length @xmath54 to its physical value by suitably adjusting the unique counterterm @xmath169 . in coordinate space this is a rather trivial matter if the long distance potential is local @xcite , as it happens in the lo , nlo , and n2lo weinberg counting . the analysis in momentum space involves detailed large momenta behaviour of the lippmann - schwinger equation and one must resort to trial and error . indeed , the n3lo case analyzed below includes nonlocalities and it _ turns out _ to provide convergent results . for numerical calculations , we take the values for the @xmath170 and @xmath171 parameters appearing in the pion exchange potential @xmath172 used in ref . @xcite , which do a good job for peripheral waves , where re - scattering effects are suppressed and where one is , thus , rather insensitive to cutoff effects . we will only consider tpe contributions to the n3lo potential . to determine the running of the counterterm we start from low cutoffs @xmath173 since the long range part of the potential is suppressed and eq . ( [ eq : c0-short ] ) may be used . actually , the analytical result is well reproduced by the numerical method used to solve the lippmann - schwinger equation in the pure contact theory with @xmath17 . once this identification has been done , the value of the cutoff is increased steadily so that the scattering length is always fixed to the experimental value , @xmath174 . this adiabatic switching on of the long range physics guarantees that we are always sitting on the correct branch which smoothly goes into the contact theory at low cutoffs fitting @xmath54 . they are physically unacceptable unless they behave as @xmath175 for @xmath176 since they do not evolve into the theory where the long range components are decoupled . ] . the running of the counterterm @xmath177 is depicted for the lo , nlo , n2lo , and n3lo potentials in fig . [ fig : c0 - 1s0.eps ] in the low cutoff region . as expected , the deviations from the simple result of the pure contact theory , eq . ( [ eq : c0-short ] ) , start at @xmath178 for lo because of the @xmath179 exchange potential . for higher cutoffs the nlo , n2lo , and n3lo counterterm displays a cycle structure very similar to what has been observed in coordinate space @xcite . the convergence of the @xmath180 phase shift for fixed values of the lab energy , @xmath181 is displayed in fig . [ fig:1s0-cutoff.eps ] . of course , one observes a faster convergence for small energies . for the maximal value of @xmath182 , cutoff values @xmath183 are needed to change the phase shift by less than @xmath184 . in agreement with the analytical estimates of ref . @xcite , the convergence of the regulated phase - shifts towards their renormalized values follows a computable power like pattern , @xmath185 . the more singular the potential at large momenta the faster the convergence . thus , the expected increased insensitivity at short distances is indeed confirmed . finally , the renormalized @xmath0 phase shift is presented in fig . [ fig : ps1s0.eps ] for lo , nlo , n2lo , and n3lo . as a check of the present calculation in momentum space , let us mention that we reproduce the coordinate space renormalized phase shifts of @xcite at lo , nlo , and n2lo . for instance , at the maximal cm momentum of @xmath186 , the maximal discrepancy between the coordinate space and momentum space phase shifts is less than half a degree when @xmath187 and @xmath188 , respectively . the clear converging pattern can be observed all over the elastic scattering region , actually at @xmath189 , one has @xmath190 , @xmath191 , @xmath192 , and @xmath193 . however , there is still a discrepancy with the nijmegen pwa result which at this energy is @xmath194 for np scattering . to have an idea on the uncertainty of the calculated phase shift , we vary the scattering length @xmath195 , the value of , @xmath196 and @xmath197 . actually the error in the latter is correlated through the goldberger - treiman relation , so we will quote both as an error in @xmath198 only . in addition , for the chiral constants we take the central values used in @xcite which provided a good description for the peripheral waves and for the uncertainties we assume as an educated guess those from the @xmath199 study @xcite . the only exception is @xmath200 , for which the error from @xmath199 @xcite is much smaller than the systematic discrepancy with the nn determination @xcite . so it is more realistic to take the systematic discrepancy as the error . thus we take @xmath201 , @xmath202 , @xmath203 , @xmath204 , @xmath205,@xmath206 , @xmath207 . the results for the particular variations are presented in table [ tab : table1 ] and as we clearly see , the uncertainty in @xmath208 dominates the total error . at @xmath189 , one has @xmath209 , @xmath210 , @xmath211 , @xmath212 . as we see the statistical uncertainty stemming from the input parameters increases with the order . if we take the difference @xmath213 as an estimate of the systematic error , adding in quadrature statistical and systematic errors we have , @xmath214 , still a smaller quantity than the discrepancy to the nijmegen phase shift . this may suggest that _ after renormalization _ there are some physical effects missing even at the n3lo level beyond pure tpe . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] in the previous section we have seen that all tpe effects included to n3lo display a convergent pattern after renormalization , but there is still some missing physics . note that while at lo and nlo the only parameters are @xmath198 , @xmath215 , @xmath216 and @xmath217 , at n2lo and n3lo there appear new low energy constants ( the @xmath170 and @xmath171 , respectively ) which can be related to @xmath199 scattering and encode short range physics not considered explicitly . the @xmath1 resonance is an outstanding feature of @xmath218 scattering and explains a great deal of the low energy constants . thus , it is interesting to analyze the role of explicit @xmath1 excitations as intermediate states in the @xmath219 potential . the importance of explicit @xmath1 degrees of freedom has been emphasized on power counting grounds in several previous works with finite cutoffs where the @xmath220 splitting is regarded as a small parameter @xmath221 @xcite . the crucial role played in the renormalization problem has been stressed in ref . @xcite . in this section , we analyze the nn potential with the nlo terms of @xcite together with the @xmath222 and @xmath223 in the box diagrams as computed in ref . one advantage of such an approach is that , as compared to the standard @xmath1-less theory , there only appears the @xmath220 splitting as a parameter . the renormalization of the @xmath0 channel proceeds along the lines discussed in the @xmath1-less theory . the results for lo , nlo , nlo+@xmath222 , and nlo+@xmath224 renormalized phase shifts in the @xmath0 channel are plotted and compared to the nijmegen partial wave analysis @xcite as a function of the cm momentum in fig . [ fig : ps1s0-del.eps ] . the most striking result is the very strong resemblance between the n2lo @xmath1-less vs nlo+@xmath222 and the n3lo @xmath1-less vs nlo+@xmath224 . these results sustain the treatment of the @xmath225 splitting as a small parameter @xmath226 corresponding to the @xmath1-counting nlo@xmath227 = nlo + @xmath222 + @xmath224 . the fact that all the contributions fall off at large distances as @xmath228 suggests that despite the ability to mimic higher order corrections in the weinberg counting for the long distance potential in the @xmath0 channel there is still missing shorter range physics beyond tpe . at n3lo , three - pion exchange occurs for the first time . these contributions have been calculated by kaiser @xcite and found to be small , which is why present n3lo nn potentials omit these contributions when renormalization is not implemented . however , it should be noted that , for small distances , the @xmath229 diagrams are proportional to @xmath230 and , thus , will ultimately dominate at short distances . a rough estimate of the results published in refs . @xcite suggests that the sum of all @xmath229 graphs is attractive . thus , we infer from there that the scattering length will still be a free input parameter . on the other hand the @xmath231-exchange contribution falls off as @xmath232 at long distances so it becomes active at rather short distances , and so the effect is expected to be small because of the short distance suppression ( modulo oscillations ) of the wave function @xmath233 typical of potentials with a short distance power like singularity @xcite . this agrees with the rule that the more singular the potential the more convergent is the calculation , as we have extensively discussed above . therefore , in a complete and renormalized n3lo calculation of the @xmath0 phase shifts , we expect the @xmath229 effects not to be large , although the predictions may be closer to the empirical values than in fig . [ fig : ps1s0.eps ] . an accurate investigation of the impact of @xmath229 exchange at n3lo on nn phase shifts represents an interesting and challenging project for the future . as we have mentioned , the very definition of the potential is ambiguous as it requires fixing the polynomial terms in the momentum . in the calculations presented above , we have taken the renormalization scheme for the potential where the fixed and cut - off independent choice @xmath19 for the potential is made . we have also analyzed the situation when a different renormalization scheme is taken , namely a non - vanishing arbitrary @xmath18 coefficient which does not run with @xmath26 . however , we allow @xmath177 to run in a way that the scattering length @xmath92 is reproduced . this generates a different renormalization trajectory for @xmath234 as compared to the case @xmath19 . we find by actual calculations that this fixed @xmath18 coefficient is irrelevant , i.e. the renormalized phase shift does not depend on this fixed value in the limit @xmath129 . roughly speaking , the reason is that while the polynomial combination @xmath235 is large at large momenta , the pion exchange part behaves as @xmath236 with an additional logarithm and thus dominates for fixed @xmath18 . this irrelevance of @xmath18 was highlighted in the coordinate space analysis of ref . @xcite where the regularization based on a radial cut - off @xmath25 would provide a compact support not sensing the details of the distributional contributions in eq . ( [ eq : pot - coor ] ) , regardless on how many derivatives of delta s are included . a quite different situation arises when @xmath18 depends on the cut - off in a way that the effective range is fixed as we discuss in the next section [ sec : weinberg ] . there , it will be shown that if @xmath237 is relevant then the phase shift is not convergent . in previous sections , we have seen that the lo , nlo , n2lo , and n3lo chiral potentials can be renormalized when one counterterm @xmath169 is determined for any value of the cutoff @xmath26 by fixing the scattering length to its experimental value , @xmath238 and the limit @xmath42 is subsequently taken . this agrees with the observation of refs . @xcite that attractive singular potentials can be renormalized with a single counterterm . however , weinberg counting requires further counterterms in the short distance potential , see eq . ( [ eq : vs(k , k ) ] ) . for instance , both at nlo and n2lo a @xmath128 counterterm should be included . in this section , we discuss whether the @xmath0 scattering amplitude is renormalizable , i.e. whether the scattering amplitude has a well defined limit , when both the @xmath177 and @xmath239 counterterms are included and fixed by fitting the scattering length @xmath240 as well as the effective range @xmath241 for any value of the cutoff @xmath26 and the limit @xmath24 is pursued . actually , when the nlo ( n2lo ) long distance potential , eq . ( [ eq:1pi2pi3pi ] ) is used , this way of proceeding corresponds to renormalizing the nlo ( n2lo ) approximation of the @xmath0 channel in the standard weinberg counting . the method we follow in practice is a straightforward extension of the case with only just one counterterm @xmath17 . in the case when @xmath242 , we get a finite ( renormalized ) effective range @xmath243 , which is close but still differs significantly from the experimental value . at n2lo with @xmath19 one gets @xmath21 . this last value is so close to the experimental one that one would not expect big changes when a @xmath18 is added to exactly fit the experimental @xmath55 . thus , it makes sense to investigate what would happen if one uses a non - vanishing @xmath18 to account for the missing , and in principle tiny , contribution to the effective range . the surprissing result , to be discussed below in detail , is that trying to fit the discrepancy in the effective range with a @xmath18 counterterm is incompatible with renormalizability . in the contact theory we found that for @xmath244 the counterterms @xmath17 and @xmath18 diverge before becoming complex numbers . thus , the corresponding hamiltonian becomes non - self - adjoint , in harmony with the wigner causality bound violations unveiled in ref . when the nlo contribution to the potential is included , the critical value of the cutoff is slightly shifted towards the higher values @xmath245 ; above those values the short distance contribution to the potential becomes non - self - adjoint and causality bounds are violated . nevertheless , and similarly to the pion - less theory , the phase shifts remain real beyond this critical cutoff . in fig . [ fig:1s0-ps - c0-c2-mom.eps ] the value of the phase shift for both nlo and n2lo approximations is depicted for several cutoff values . as we see , at nlo one observes large variations when the cutoff is changed from @xmath246 to @xmath247 . in fig . [ fig:1s0-ps - c0-c2-mom.300.eps ] , we plot the value at a fixed lab energies as a function of the cutoff for both nlo and n2lo . as we see the phase shift does not seem to converge to any particular value when @xmath26 is increased ; in fact large variations can be clearly seen at moderate cutoff values , @xmath248 for @xmath249 and @xmath250 for @xmath251 . on the other hand , let us note that a plateau region not always appears , and when it does the residual contribution from pion - exchange effects is less important and the counterterms may dominate the calculation . in other words , if the cutoff was too small , one would be driven back to an effective range expansion with no visible contribution from chiral potentials whatsoever . thus , any finite cutoff calculation within a higher cutoff regime turns out to be strongly cutoff dependent , or else the cutoff must be fine tuned to intermediate energy data , hence becoming an esssential , and not an auxiliary , parameter of the theory . note that all the problems are triggered by _ insisting _ on fitting the effective range parameter to the experimental value by introducing the @xmath18 counterterm required by weinberg power counting on the short distance interaction . in contrast , if @xmath19 , as advocated in refs . @xcite and sec . [ sec : n3lo ] above , not only is the phase shift convergent in the limit @xmath42 ( in practice @xmath252 ) but also most of the effective range is saturated by the chiral potential and under the assumption of van ver waals dominance one gets at n2lo the analytical result ( see ref . @xcite for details ) , @xmath253^\frac14\ ] ] which yields @xmath254 , a surprissingly good approximation . further studies exploiting the chiral van der waals correlations can be found in ref . @xcite . ] . although we have checked that these results are numerically robust within the lse by increasing the number of grid points , there is always a reasonable doubt , since these are demanding calculations . thus , it would be nice to understand the lack of convergence from a different perspective , as we do next . let us compare the previous findings in momentum space with related investigations in coordinate space @xcite . a thorough study in coordinate space has revealed that the very existence of the @xmath42 limit may actually depend on the specific representation of the short distance physics . this analytical result has been verified by numerical calculations and will become extremely helpful in analyzing the momentum space calculations presented above . thus , for the sake of completeness it is worth reviewing the emerging pattern from ref . @xcite . as we have discussed in sec . [ sec : coor - space ] , within the boundary condition regularization the _ unknown _ short distance interaction is represented by the logarithmic derivative of the wave function at the short distance cutoff radius @xmath25 , @xmath255 . in an energy expansion of the wave function at short distances , one has @xmath256 and its logarithmic derivative for which a continuity condition is required . this introduces an energy dependence which eludes the wigner causality bound discussed in refs . @xcite , since self - adjointness is broken from the start . as we discussed previously in the contact theory described in sec . [ sec : coor - pion - less ] , at second order in the energy the neglected terms are @xmath163 and _ any _ of the three representations displayed by eq . ( [ eq : d_p s ] ) might be equally acceptable . actually , we found that renormalized amplitudes fall into two classes and that not all of them approach the renormalized limit in the same way , see eq . ( [ eq : coor - pion - renor ] ) . here , we will extend that study by inquiring what happens when the same three representations displayed by eq . ( [ eq : d_p s ] ) are used and the long distance potential @xmath257 is taken to be the nlo and n2lo for @xmath154 as the cutoff is removed , @xmath152 . note that all three cases possess _ by construction _ the same scattering length @xmath54 and effective range @xmath55 and the same long distance potential for @xmath154 . thus , any difference is clearly attributable to the different short distance representation . the results are displayed in fig . [ fig:1s0-ps - c0-c2-coor.eps ] for fixed short distance cutoff values @xmath25 as a function of the cm momentum @xmath258 . for finite values of @xmath25 we see a difference which can naturally be explained by the different off - shell behaviour of the short distance physics . as we see , the difference persists as the cutoff is being removed and in fact is magnified . as was already pointed out in a previous work @xcite , only the case @xmath259 representing a rational function turns out to yield a unique and well defined finite value for the phase shift ) . ] . this fact is clearly seen from inspection of fig . [ fig:1s0-ps - c0-c2-coor.300.eps ] where we plot the phase shifts for a fixed value of the cm momentum @xmath260 as a function of the equivalent sharp momentum cutoff @xmath261 derived for the pion - less theory in sec . [ sec : coor - mom ] . the striking similarity between the momentum space calculation presented in fig . [ fig:1s0-ps - c0-c2-mom.300.eps ] and the coordinate space calculation displayed in fig . [ fig:1s0-ps - c0-c2-coor.300.eps ] for _ finite cutoffs _ is noteworthy although not completely surprising in the light of the analysis of appendix [ sec : nyquist ] . there , the finite cutoff equivalence , @xmath262 , deduced in the contact theory is shown to hold also in the presence of a local potential . of course , all these features depend on the singular character of the interaction at short distances and do not depend on the specific form of the potential , so we expect them to hold also when @xmath1 degrees of freedom are explicitly taken into account . although we can not prove it analytically in momentum space , the remarkable similarity of the coordinate space analysis with the present momentum space calculations strongly suggests that the standard polynomial representation of the short distance potential is _ incompatible _ with renormalization . of course , this does not preclude the possible existence of a suitable potential representation of the short distance interaction , most likely with complex counterterms , such that both low energy parameters can be fixed and the cutoff can at the same time be removed . we leave such an interesting investigation for the future . in the present paper , we have analyzed the renormalization of the singlet np phase shift in the @xmath0 channel incorporating one- and two - pion exchange effects . for the long distance potential , the standard weinberg scheme based on dimensional power counting is adopted to n3lo . however , the short distance physics is parameterized in terms of one unique energy and momentum independent counterterm whose cutoff dependence is determined by adjusting the scattering length to its physical value . the present analysis is carried out in momentum space in a somewhat complementary manner as previously done in coordinate space @xcite . actually , we have analyzed and reproduced those results directly in the more popular momentum space after the cutoff has been effectively removed . in order to stress the equivalence of both approaches , we have displayed many results in parallel . this is not just a stylistic matter of presentation ; besides numerical simplicity , much understanding of the renormalization problem has been achieved by a direct analysis in coordinate space at least for local potentials . the present work provides a further example in this respect . the momentum space framework allows a direct extension to include n3lo contributions which include non - local pieces in the long distance chiral potential . the main outcome of such a calculation is that the n3lo chiral potential induces rather small corrections as compared to the n2lo results in all of the elastic scattering region . as anticipated previously @xcite , this happens to be so even when the n3lo potential is more singular than the n2lo one at short distances . moreover , the analytical scaling behaviour for large cutoffs @xmath26 of the scattering amplitude predicted in a previous coordinate space analysis @xcite is confirmed qualitatively by the present momentum space calculations ; increasing the order in the expansion of the long distance potential suppresses more the finite cutoff dependence . in summary , the scheme is convergent , but differs from the expected phase shifts obtained from partial wave analyses . an error analysis of the results shows that although there are some uncertainties induced by the input parameters , the corresponding error bands are not large enough to be compatible with the partial wave analysis of the nijmegen group . the n3lo approximation to the long distance chiral potential is computed within a heavy baryon expansion and assuming only explicit nucleon degrees of freedom in the nn potential . this implies in particular that the @xmath220 splitting is considered a non - small parameter . however , this number is about twice the pion mass , so it is not clear whether such an assumption is fully justified . therefore , we have analyzed the nn scattering problem when explicit @xmath1 intermediate state excitations are included in the potential . the net result is that , after renormalization , the @xmath222 and @xmath224 box diagrams contributions mimic extremely accurately the @xmath1-less n2lo and n3lo potentials , respectively , and thus fail to describe the higher energy region of the @xmath0 phase shift . given the fact that these contributions also fall off at large distances as @xmath263 , this result reinforces the conclusion that there is some shorter range missing physics beyond that provided by tpe . further , it is interesting to compare the present renormalized results with those obtained for a two pion exchange potential computed within a relativistic baryon framework which sums up all heavy nucleon components @xcite thus contains a full determination of tpe contributions assuming all other degrees of freedom ( including explicit @xmath1 s ) are infinitely heavy . there , all np partial waves with @xmath264 are analyzed and for the particular case of the @xmath0 channel the results are rather similar to those found here . this , again , suppports the present conclusion that , presumably , the components of the nn potential with a shorter range than tpe might finally provide the missing repulsion needed to reduce the @xmath22 overshooting of the @xmath0 effective range as well as the too low value of the phase shift in the region with cm momenta @xmath265 . we have also investigated the convergence of the standard weinberg counting for both the short distance as well as the long distance potential . at nlo and n2lo this corresponds to including a polynomial momentum dependence in the short distance interaction by means of two counterterms which may then be fixed by adjusting the scattering length and the effective range to their experimental values . we find that , with these two renormalization conditions , the counterterms turn out to be complex for not too large cutoffs ( around @xmath266 ) , signaling the breakdown of self - adjointness of the potential , and more generally suggesting a violation of wigner s causality condition . nonetheless , despite phase shifts remaining real , a unique renormalized limit does not exist . this lack of convergence agrees with similar findings in coordinate space anticipated in ref . the physical understanding of the situation is as follows . on the one hand the long range physics is fixed , thus , the off - shell propagation within the long range region is unambiguous . on the other hand , the short range potential must be adjusted to provide the threshold parameters such as the scattering length , the effective range etc . if the short range potential is just determined from fixing the scattering length only , this is at zero energy and becomes zero range when the cutoff is removed , so there is no off - shell ambiguity . in contrast , fixing further the effective range requires non - zero energy and there are in fact infinitely many ways of parameterizing this , with different off - shell behaviour even when the cutoff is removed . in other words , fixing a finite range and removing the cutoff depends on details of the method . these conflicts between off - shellness and finiteness are not new in field theory . green s functions which are renormalized on - shell do not necessarily provide finite off - shell amplitudes . the standard weinberg parameterization as a polynomial in momenta is one choice which may not turn out to be consistent with renormalizability . in this regard , it is interesting to mention that coordinate space detailed studies based on renormalization group properties @xcite suggest the existence of a suitable short distance representation yielding convergent results in theories with more than one counterterm . the generalization of those results to momentum space would require an in - depth study of the renormalization group in the presence of eventually nonlocal but singular potentials . we note that the energy dependence of the coordinate space solution violates self - adjointness explicitly and we expect that most likely an energy independent non - polynomial momentum space solution would spoil self - adjointness as well . it is important to note that with a finite cutoff and four counterterms the @xmath0 phase shift has been successfully described within the standard weinberg counting @xcite . in this regard , it is natural to question the usefulness of taking the infinite cutoff limit and to carry out a renormalization process . from a physical point of view the limit @xmath42 corresponds to consider other degrees of freedom than those not considered explicitly to be infinitely heavy . thus , the aim of the renormalization program is far more stringent than previous finite cutoff calculations . within such a framework any failure can be unambiguously attributed to missing physical information on the long distance potential , and the renormalization process highlights this in a rather vivid manner as one clearly sees when going from ope to tpe potentials . from a mathematical perspective the renormalizability requirement imposes tight constraints on the admissible forms of the short distance physics for some given long distance interactions . these are powerful conditions which have traditionally been the great strength of the renormalization ideas to avoid unnecessary proliferation of interactions . since the power counting of long distance potentials is not uniquely determined yet ( one may e.g. include or not explicit @xmath1 s ) , it would be very helpful to see what kind of short distance constraints on those potentials might be imposed as well on the basis of renormalizability or other principles . the problems with the weinberg counting for the short distance polynomial form in the momenta of the interaction with renormalization found in this paper for nlo and n2lo is to be added to the other ones noted in previous works @xcite . on the mathematical side , it is noticeable that the coordinate space analysis of ref . @xcite conjectured this result by exploiting the compelling requirement of completeness and self - adjointness for the renormalized quantum mechanical problem for a local chiral potential which at first sight may seem completely germane concepts to the eft machinery . on the phenomenological side , it should be noted that this inconsistency result does not explain why the renormalized phase shift with just one counterterm comes out reasonably close to the accepted ones , but certainly makes this unique and finite prediction more credible and inevitable from a theoretical perspective if self - adjointness is maintained , and provides further confidence on the virtues of a renormalization principle within the chiral approach to the nn interaction . one of us ( e.r.a . ) thanks diego pablo ruiz padillo ( departamento de fsica aplicada , universidad de granada ) for patient instruction on the virtues of nyquist theorem some years ago . we also thank evgeny epelpaum for a critical reading of the manuscript and daniel phillips for remarks on the paper . the work of d. r. e. has been partially funded by the ministerio de ciencia y tecnologa under contract no . fpa2004 - 05616 , the junta de castilla y len under contract no . the work of e.r.a . is supported in part by funds provided by the spanish dgi and feder funds with grant no . fis2005 - 00810 , junta de andaluca grants no . fqm225 - 05 , eu integrated infrastructure initiative hadron physics project contract no . rii3-ct-2004 - 506078 . m. p. v. has been funded by the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft ( sfb / tr 16 ) , helmholtz association ( contract number vh - ng-222 ) . r. m. has been supported in part by the u. s. national science foundation under grant no . in this appendix we discuss further the relation between momentum and coordinate space for _ finite cutoffs _ and local potentials . we will show that solving the lippmann - schwinger equation for a long range potential with a sharp cutoff @xmath26 is equivalent to the solution of the schrdinger equation for the same potential in a discretized grid with @xmath267 . this equivalence reminds the previous identification between sharp momentum cutoff @xmath26 and the short distance cutoff @xmath25 found in the contact theory in sec . [ sec : coor - mom ] , @xmath268 . we can choose the initial grid point at @xmath269 , thus recovering the previously mentioned equivalence . actually , by invoking nyquist theorem on the cut - off ls equation , we deduce a discretized version of the variable phase equation @xcite which allows to discuss both the renormalization as well as the decimation problem of the nn - force based on chiral potentials . let us consider as a starting point the lippmann - schwinger equation for @xmath270 wave scattering , written in the form @xmath271 where @xmath272 are the matrix elements of the @xmath137 matrix between initial and final cm momentum states @xmath50 and @xmath51 respectively and the corresponding potential matrix element is given by @xmath273 for a local potential . since we are integrating the intermediate momentum up to infinity , we are implicitly assuming that @xmath49 is a regular potential . the singular potential case will be discussed later . now , if we cutoff the potential in momentum space ) . ] , we get the regularized potential @xmath274 where @xmath275 is the heaviside step function . in coordinate space the cutoff potential becomes @xmath276 which is obviously nonlocal and becomes local only when @xmath129 ( second line ) . the cutoff lse , where @xmath277 , can be solved by standard means . in the spirit of an eft , based on the idea that low energy dynamics does not depend on the details at short distances , it may perhaps be appropriate to proceed a bit differently . actually , if high momentum states are cutoff from the theory the same idea should apply to small _ resolution _ scales , i.e. regardless whether they are short or long . that means that using _ too much _ information on the potential @xmath278 even if it is exactly known point - wise may be illusory at wave - lengths longer than a given resolution , @xmath279 , is supplemented by highly oscillatory ripples at short resolution scales , @xmath280 the phase shifts should be insensitive to them at @xmath281 . ] so that one can sample @xmath278 with _ some _ resolution @xmath282 . this obviously reduces the number of coordinate mesh points in the integration . in the present context , nyquist theorem @xcite is remarkably useful because it provides an optimal way of sampling signals which have a bandwidth in fourier space , i.e. , functions for which @xmath283 then , for the original function we have @xmath284 if we define the sampling function @xmath285 of the function @xmath286 at the equidistant points @xmath287 , with the optimal @xmath288 separation , @xmath289 and compute its fourier transform we get @xmath290 note that for the optimal sampling @xmath291 is bandwidth limited to the @xmath292 $ ] interval , it can be expressed as a fourier sum @xmath293 where @xmath294 . thus it is trivial to see that @xmath295 when the sampling is done with @xmath296 . ] . inverting the fourier transform we get @xmath297}{{\pi } ( x - x_n ) } \delta x \ , .\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus , if we sample the function according to eq . ( [ eq : sampl ] ) , the following identity holds at the sampling points @xmath298 hence , there is no loss of information on the sampling points if the sampling is done equidistantly with the optimal nyquist frequency , @xmath299 . in particular , it does not really make sense to sample the function with smaller @xmath300 . in the next section we apply this sampling principle to the potential . nyquist theorem also applies for the special case of the lippmann - schwinger equation in s - wave scattering , although the derivation is different in some details to the one presented in the previous section . for clarity , we present here these details . we will consider first the general case of a non - local potential , for which the schrdinger equation in s - wave reads @xmath301 we can sample this non - local potential as @xmath302 for the momentum space representation of the sampled potential we get @xmath303 where @xmath304 . as a consequence of the cut - off @xmath26 , the potential @xmath305 can be expressed as a sum of spherical bessel functions @xmath306 where @xmath307 . then by taking @xmath267 , the sampled potential recovers the original one , i.e. @xmath308 , for @xmath309 . by fourier - transforming @xmath310 back to coordinate space , it can be checked that it reproduces the original sampling points , i.e. @xmath311 for the nyquist sampling frequency . in the case of a local potential , the one which interests us most , we sample the following way @xmath312 after double fourier - transforming , we get @xmath313 which makes the potential local for the grid points . it is in fact a finite cut - off version of @xmath314 once we notice that @xmath315 @xmath316 . for a lippmann schwinger equation with a finite cut - off @xmath26 all the matrix elements become a linear combination of separable terms . thus the ls equation becomes a linear matrix equation which can be solved by standard techniques by writing @xmath317 and defining propagator matrix elements @xmath318 therefore we get @xmath319 this equation can be reduced to a finite - dimensional @xmath320 linear algebra problem by cutting the sums to @xmath321 . the effect of this simplification can be seen by sampling @xmath322 in coordinate space ( see eqs . ( [ eq : sampl ] ) and ( [ eq : sampl - local ] ) ) @xmath323 from which we can check that cutting the sum is equivalent to introducing the ( harmless ) infrared cut - off @xmath324 . note that for local potentials , the sampled potential matrix elements at the grid points are diagonal @xmath325 thus eq . ( [ eq : ls_grid ] ) becomes @xmath326 which looks like a multiple scattering equation , with on - shell propagation between delta - shell scatterers . after matrix inversion , the on - shell solution is then given by @xmath327 in the previous section we have seen that for the lippmann - schwinger equation with a cut - off @xmath26 , we can either use the original momentum space potential @xmath305 and solve by standard means , or expand this potential , i.e. use the sampled potential @xmath310 , and solve as a linear algebra problem ( as they are both the same potential for momenta below the cut - off ) . alternatively we can directly solve the schrdinger equation for the sampling potential @xmath328 . this procedure will give an excellent approximation to the solution of the ls equation ( although not the exact solution , as explained at the end of this section ) but at a much smaller computational cost . for this purpose we make the replacement @xmath329 which is a superposition of equally spaced delta - shell potentials . it should be noted that the point @xmath330 does not contribute , as it lies at the integration boundary of the schrdinger equation . then , we have @xmath331 thus , for a potential of size @xmath332 where we do not want to describe energies higher than @xmath26 we should do with an infrared cut - off larger than the potential s length scale , @xmath333 , or equivalently @xmath334 . we can solve the schrdinger equation piecewise , @xmath335 where @xmath336 is the amplitude and @xmath337 can be understood as the accumulated phase - shift due to adding a new delta shell at @xmath338 chosen to be located at the midpoint @xmath339 ( for reasons to become clear soon ) . note that with this choice the lowest possible location of the phase - shift , @xmath340 corresponds to the point @xmath341 which we may identify with a short distance ( ultraviolet ) cutoff . this identification between the momentum - space cutoff agrees with the one obtained for the pure short range theory by solving the lse without any discretization ( see sec . [ sec : coor - mom ] ) . it should be noted that the previous method for solving the schrdinger equation does not really generate the exact solution of the ls equation with a cut - off , but only a close approximation . although @xmath328 is the best sampling function for @xmath342 , it is not the same quantum mechanical potential . the solution to the ls equation with @xmath342 can be exactly reproduced by solving the non - local schrdinger equation , eq . ( [ eq : schroedinger_nonlocal ] ) , with the potential @xmath343 which comes from inverse fourier transforming @xmath310 . the schrdinger equation should be solved with trivial initial conditions , @xmath344 , as all the physically relevant information is included in @xmath343 . on the contrary , if we solve @xmath328 , a sum of delta shells , we must include a non trivial initial condition sampling point . ] , even in the absence of any short range physics . if we solve the discretized schrdinger equation with a trivial initial boundary condition , @xmath345 , then a certain error will be included in the final solution . in the worst case we can expect an error of order @xmath279 . by means of the variable phase equation @xcite we can perform a better assessment of the error , the variable phase equation will yield @xmath346 as a curiosity , we can see that @xmath340 will scale as an inverse power of @xmath279 for a singular potential , thus signaling the need of a counterterm . ] , yielding , for example , an @xmath347 error for a yukawa potential or @xmath348 for a square well . from the previous discussion , it is apparent how to include a counterterm in the computation . it enters throught the initial sampling point of @xmath349 , which maps onto a constant term in @xmath310 counterterm when projected to the s - wave takes the form @xmath350 thus , if we write the sampled potential @xmath351 , and take into account eq . ( [ eq : v_ij_nyquist ] ) , we see that @xmath17 maps only onto @xmath352 , giving a constant contribution in momentum space , as expected . ] . thus it is ignored when solving the schrdinger equation for @xmath349 , and it enters through the initial condition @xmath340 . similar remarks can be made for singular potentials , in which a counterterm must be included in order to obtain a stable result for @xmath353 . the previous discussion can be elaborated further to reach interesting results . matching the wave functions at the points where the delta shells are located , @xmath354 , we simply get @xmath355 where @xmath356 is the reduced potential . this is a recursion relation for the phase - shift at the interval midpoint @xmath357 . unlike the matrix equation which has traditional storage limitations for large number of grid points @xmath358 , this equation does not posses this shortcoming allowing for rather large @xmath358 values . similar equations were deduced many years ago @xcite as a practical tool to attack the inverse scattering problem and to determine the nn potential on the grid points . defining the discretized effective range function , @xmath359 we get @xmath360 which can be rewritten as a continuous fraction . note that for the cutoff theory both eqs . ( [ eq : vf_dis ] ) and ( [ eq : m_dis ] ) are almost exact . the only approximation comes from the finiteness of the cutoff @xmath26 . an important property which will be used later on is the reflection property , namely the symmetry under the replacement @xmath361 which means that on the grid running the relation upwards or downwards are inverse operations of each other . obviously this property may fail in practice only due to accumulation of computer round - off errors over large evolution distances . this is also the reason why we choose the midpoint @xmath362 for the accumulated phase shift : in any other case we would lose the reflection property . the regular solution at the origin reads @xmath363 if we take the limit @xmath42 we can define @xmath364 , to get @xmath365 which is the variable phase equation @xcite up to finite grid corrections and can be interpreted as the change in the accumulated phase when a truncated potential of the parametric form @xmath366 is steadily switched on as a function of the variable @xmath367 . ( [ eq : vf_dis ] ) is thus a discretized variable phase equation , corresponding to a discretized potential sampled at the optimal nyquist frequency . this equation and its generalization to coupled channels has extensively been used to treat the renormalization problem in nn scattering in refs . @xcite . and similar equations for higher low energy parameters , @xmath370 . note that the potential only enters explicitly in the equation involving the discretized scattering length . one of the nice features of this equation is the way how it handles the case of singular points , when @xmath371 or other parameters diverge , since standard integration methods for the corresponding differential equation are based on the smoothness of the solution and hence fail . the way to proceed in practice is quite simple . for a given number of grid points @xmath358 we take the scattering length , @xmath372 , the effective range , @xmath373 and run eq . ( [ eq : alpha_dis ] ) and eq . ( [ eq : r_dis ] ) to determine @xmath374 and @xmath375 . then , we use , e.g. @xmath376 and run eq . ( [ eq : m_dis ] ) upwards to obtain @xmath377 . due to the reversibility of the algorithm one _ exactly _ has @xmath378 in the limit @xmath379 for any finite grid size @xmath380 ( modulo computer arithmetic round - off errors ) . in this way we can fix the initial boundary conditions to exactly reproduce any given scattering length , effective range , etc . this method was used successfully @xcite to extract low energy threshold parameters in all partial waves with @xmath381 from high quality potentials @xcite . on that case , we ran eq . ( [ eq : alpha_dis ] ) and eq . ( [ eq : r_dis ] ) with trivial initial boundary conditions @xmath382 , @xmath383 , etc , and obtain the potential s threshold parameters as @xmath384 , @xmath385 , etc . as we have said the discretized running parameters located at the lowest possible radius @xmath386 correspond to the short distance interactions . nowhere in the equations does the potential at the origin appears explicitly , since according to eq . ( [ eq : m_dis ] ) , one starts with @xmath387 . from this point of view the treatment of regular and singular potentials at the origin is on equal footing . the previous equations provide the accumulated phase shifts due to the addition of equidistant delta - shells sampling the original potential in coordinate space . we want to show that they actually provide a solution of the decimation problem of the lse where the low energy states are cutoff . assuming that we have the lse with a given cutoff @xmath26 related to potential , we ask how does the physical phase - shift change when we make the transformation @xmath388 , in the potential fixed . applying the process explained above based on nyquist theorem we see that this corresponds to double the grid resolution @xmath389 . obviously , by repeating the process we may effectively have @xmath390 ( being @xmath332 the range of the potential ) and hence the potential never contributes and @xmath391 . thus , for @xmath392 , the short range theory is recovered . in the opposite limit @xmath393 we get the full short range plus long range physics . the discretized representation of the lse is algebraically closed , since it corresponds to a separable interaction , but any term contains _ all _ powers in momentum . moreover , they also vanish for large @xmath50 , unlike any polynomial approximation to it . the numerical procedure explained above of computing the phase - shift from some low energy parameters like @xmath397,@xmath55 , etc . and the long distance potential @xmath278 can be also carried out by assuming that the potential at the lowest grid point , @xmath398 , is energy dependent yielding @xmath399 expanding in powers of momentum we can identify the terms @xmath400\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath17 , @xmath18 , etc . note that the radius of convergence of the expansion in @xmath50 and @xmath401 is the whole complex plane , due to the meromorphic character of the spherical bessel functions . Abstract:
[ "' '' '' the renormalization of the chiral np interaction in the @xmath0 channel to n3lo in weinberg counting for the long distance potential with one single momentum and energy independent counterterm is carried out . this renormalization scheme yields finite and unique results and is free of short distance off - shell ambiguities . we observe good convergence in the entire elastic range below pion production threshold and find that there are some small physical effects missing in the purely pionic chiral nn potential with or without inclusion of explicit @xmath1 degrees of freedom . we also study the renormalizability of the standard weinberg counting at nlo and n2lo when a momentum dependent polynomial counterterm is included . our numerical results suggest that the inclusion of this counterterm does not yield a convergent amplitude ( at nlo and n2lo ) ." ]
15,820
15,820
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: this work is concerned with catalytic branching processes that model the dynamics of catalyst - reactant populations in which the activity level of the reactant depends on the amount of catalyst present . branching processes in catalytic environments have been studied extensively and are motivated , for instance , by biochemical reaction networks ; see @xcite and references therein . a typical setting consists of populations of multiple types such that the rate of growth ( depletion ) of one population type is directly affected by population sizes of other types . the simplest such model consists of a continuous time countable state branching process describing the evolution of the catalyst population and a second branching process for which the branching rate is proportional to the total mass of the catalyst population , modeling the evolution of reactant particles . such processes were introduced in @xcite in the setting of super - brownian motions ; see @xcite . for classical catalyst - reactant branching processes , the catalyst population dies out with positive probability and subsequent to the catalyst extinction , the reactant population stays unchanged , and therefore the population dynamics are modeled until the time the catalyst becomes extinct . in this work , we consider a setting where the catalyst population is maintained above a positive threshold through a specific form of controlled immigration . branching process models with immigration have also been well studied in literature ; see @xcite and references therein . however , typical mechanisms that have been considered correspond to adding an independent poisson component ; see , for example , @xcite . here , instead , we consider a model where immigration takes place only when the population drops below a certain threshold . roughly speaking , we consider a sequence @xmath0 of continuous time branching processes , where @xmath1 starts with @xmath2 particles . when the population drops below @xmath2 , it is instantaneously restored to the level @xmath2 . there are many settings where controlled immigration models of the above form arise naturally . one class of examples arises from predator - prey models in ecology , where one may be concerned with the restoration of populations that are close to extinction by reintroducing species when they fall below a certain threshold . in our work , the motivation for the study of such controlled immigration models comes from problems in chemical reaction networks where one wants to keep the levels of certain types of molecules above a threshold in order to maintain a desired level of production ( or inhibition ) of other chemical species in the network . such questions are of interest in the study of control and regulation of chemical reaction networks . a control action where one minimally adjusts the levels of one chemical type to keep it above a fixed threshold is one of the simplest regulatory mechanisms , and the goal of this research is to study system behavior under such mechanisms with the long - term objective of designing optimal control policies . the specific goal of the current work is to derive simpler approximate and reduced models , through the theory of diffusion approximations and stochastic averaging techniques , that are more tractable for simulation and mathematical treatment than the original branching process models . in order to keep the presentation simple , we consider the setting of one catalyst and one reactant . however , similar limit theorems can be obtained for a more general chemical reaction network in which the levels of some of the chemical species are regulated in a suitable manner . settings where some of the chemical species act as inhibitors rather than catalysts are also of interest and can be studied using similar techniques . these extensions will be pursued elsewhere . our main goal is to establishes diffusion approximations for such regulated catalyst - reactant systems under suitable scalings . we consider two different scaling regimes ; in the first setting the catalyst and reactant evolve on `` comparable timescales , '' while in the second setting the catalyst evolves `` much faster '' than the reactant . in the former setting , the limit model is described through a coupled system of reflected stochastic differential equations with reflection in the space @xmath3 . the precise result ( theorem [ thmcrdiffusion ] ) is stated in section [ secdiffusionlimit ] . such limit theorems are of interest for various analytic and computational reasons . it is simpler to simulate ( reflected ) diffusions than branching processes , particularly for large network settings . analytic properties such as hitting time probabilities and steady state behavior are more easily analyzed for the diffusion models than for their branching process counterparts . in general , such diffusion limits give parsimonious model representations and provide useful qualitative insight to the underlying stochastic phenomena . for the second scaling regime , where the catalyst evolution is much faster , we establish a stochastic averaging limit theorem . a key ingredient here is an ergodicity result , which says that under a suitable `` criticality from below '' assumption on the catalyst dynamics , the limiting catalyst reflected diffusion admits a unique stationary distribution , which takes an explicit form ( proposition [ propstationarydistrofx ] ) . characterization of the invariant distribution is based on a variant of echeverria s criterion for constrained markov processes @xcite . next , by constructing suitable _ uniform _ lyapunov functions , we show that the stationary distribution of the scaled catalyst branching process converges to that of the catalyst diffusion ( theorem [ thmtightnessandconvergenceofnu^n1 ] ) . these results are then used to establish a stochastic averaging principle that governs the dynamics of the reactant population in the fast catalyst limit . proofs proceed by developing suitable moment estimates that are uniform in time and the scaling parameter and by using characterization results for probability laws of reflected diffusions through certain constrained martingale problems @xcite . the limit evolution of the reactant population is given through an autonomous one - dimensional sde with coefficients that depend on the stationary distribution of a reflected diffusion in @xmath4 . such model reductions are important in that they not only help in better understanding the dynamics of the system but also help in reducing computational costs in simulations . indeed , since in the model considered here the invariant distribution is explicit , the coefficients in the one - dimensional averaged diffusion model are easily computed , and consequently this model is significantly easier to analyze and simulate than the original two - dimensional model . we refer the reader to @xcite and references therein for similar results in the setting of ( nonregulated ) chemical reaction networks . it will be of interest to see if similar model reductions can be obtained for general multi - dimensional regulated chemical - reaction networks . key mathematical challenges will be to identify suitable conditions for ergodicity of multi - dimensional reflected diffusions in polyhedral domains that arise from the regulated part of the network , and to develop uniform ( in time and the scaling parameter ) moment estimates for such multi - dimensional constrained diffusions . we consider two different formulations of models with multiple time scales . in theorem [ thmfastcatalystweaklimit ] we consider the setting where both catalyst and reactant processes are described through ( reflected ) diffusions and the time scale parameter appears in the coefficients of the catalyst evolution equation . an important step here is to argue that the generator of the two - dimensional catalyst - reactant reflected diffusion is suitably close to the generator of the one - dimensional averaged diffusion , for large values of the scaling parameter . bounds on the exponential moments of the catalyst process , obtained in lemma [ lemunifmombdx ] , play a key role in this argument . the second formulation is considered in theorem [ fastcatalystbpaveraging ] . here , both catalyst and reactant populations evolve according to near critical countable state branching processes , and the branching rate in the catalyst dynamics is of higher order than that for the reactant process . in this setting one encounters the additional difficulty of showing that the steady state distributions of the scaled catalyst branching process , for large values of the scaling parameter , are suitably close to the stationary distribution of the limiting catalyst reflected diffusion . the approach taken here is based on characterizing the limit points of a certain sequence of random measures on the path space of the catalyst process and the associated reflection process , as time and the scaling parameter together approach infinity . the model considered in this work does not incorporate any spatial dynamics of the two chemical species . as noted earlier in the , in the unregulated setting , dawson and fleischmann @xcite considered catalyst - reactant systems , with chemical species moving continuously in a spatial domain , given in terms of super - brownian motions . it will be of interest to develop analogous continuous spatial models for the regulated catalyst - reactant systems of the form considered in the current work . this question will be explored in a future work . the paper is organized as follows . we begin in section [ secdiffusionlimit ] by presenting the basic limit theorem in the setting of `` comparable time scales . '' section [ chasymptoticbehaviorofthecatalystpopulation ] studies the time asymptotic behavior of the catalyst process under a suitable _ criticality from below _ assumption . section [ secdiffusionlimitofthereactantunderfastcatalystdynamics1 ] presents our main results for the multiple time scale setting . section [ secauxresults ] collects some auxiliary estimates that are needed in our proofs . section [ sec6 ] proves theorem [ thmcrdiffusion ] , and section [ secproofofasymptoticbehaviorofthecatalystpopulation ] is devoted to the proofs of proposition [ propstationarydistrofx ] and theorem [ thmtightnessandconvergenceofnu^n1 ] . finally , in section [ secdiffusionlimitofthereactantunderfastcatalystdynamics ] we present proofs of stochastic averaging principles stated in section [ secdiffusionlimitofthereactantunderfastcatalystdynamics1 ] . the following notation will be used throughout this work . denote by @xmath5 the natural numbers , let @xmath6 , denote the set of integers by @xmath7 and let @xmath8 be the set of nonnegative real numbers . the state spaces of the scaled catalyst , reactant , and auxiliary processes , @xmath9 and @xmath10 , respectively , introduced below in ( [ eqhatw^n ] ) , are @xmath11 , @xmath12 and @xmath13 . let @xmath14 and @xmath15 . let @xmath16 denote the space of @xmath17-times continuously differentiable , real valued functions on @xmath18 , and denote by @xmath19 the space of @xmath16 functions with compact support . here , by a ( @xmath17-times ) differentiable function @xmath20 on a set @xmath21 we mean a function that can be extended to a ( @xmath17-times ) differentiable function @xmath22 on an open domain @xmath23 such that @xmath22 restricted to @xmath24 equals @xmath20 . given a metric space @xmath25 , the space of probability measures on @xmath25 will be denoted by @xmath26 , the borel @xmath27-field on @xmath25 by @xmath28 , and the space of real valued , bounded , measurable functions on @xmath25 by bm(@xmath25 ) . let @xmath29 and @xmath30 , where these @xmath24-spaces are endowed with the usual skorohod topology . let @xmath31 be the space of continuous functions from @xmath32 to @xmath32 endowed with the local uniform topology . we say a sequence @xmath33 of random variables with values in some polish space @xmath34 is tight if the corresponding probability laws are a tight sequence in @xmath35 . for a function @xmath36 , let the jump at time @xmath37 be defined as @xmath38 , @xmath39 , and @xmath40 . for a function @xmath41 and @xmath42 , let @xmath43 . for two semimartingales @xmath44 and @xmath45 , the quadratic covariation ( or bracket process ) and predictable ( or conditional ) quadratic covariation are denoted by @xmath46_t\}_{t\in{\mathbb{r}}_+}$ ] and @xmath47 , respectively ; their definition will be recalled in section [ secauxresults ] . consider a sequence of pairs of continuous time , countable state markov branching processes @xmath48 , where @xmath1 and @xmath49 represent the number of catalyst and reactant particles , respectively . the dynamics are described as follows . each of the @xmath50 particles alive at time @xmath37 has an exponentially distributed lifetime with parameter @xmath51 ( mean lifetime @xmath52 ) . when it dies , each such particle gives rise to a number of offspring , according to the offspring distribution @xmath53 . additionally , if the catalyst population drops below @xmath2 , it is instantaneously replenished back to the level @xmath2 ( _ controlled immigration _ ) . the branching rate of the reactant process @xmath49 is of the order of the current total mass of the catalyst population , that is , @xmath54 , and we denote the offspring distribution of @xmath49 by @xmath55 . a precise definition of the pair @xmath48 will be given below . we are interested in the study of asymptotic behavior of @xmath56 , under suitable scaling , as @xmath57 . to facilitate some weak convergence arguments , we will consider an auxiliary sequence of processes @xmath58 that `` shadow '' @xmath1 in the following manner . the process @xmath58 will be a @xmath7 valued pure jump process whose jump instances and sizes are the same as that of @xmath1 away from the boundary @xmath59 , whereas when @xmath1 is at the boundary , @xmath58 has a negative jump of size 1 whenever there is immigration of a catalyst particle into the system . this description is made precise through the infinitesimal generator given in ( [ eqgeneratorofwholeprocess ] ) . the process @xmath10 will not appear in the statements of the results ; nevertheless it plays an important role in our proofs . we now give a precise description of the various processes and the scaling that is considered . roughly speaking , time is accelerated by a factor of @xmath2 , and mass is scaled down by a factor of @xmath2 . define rcll processes @xmath60 and let @xmath61 , where @xmath62 is the initial number of catalyst and reactant particles and @xmath63 . then @xmath64 is characterized as the @xmath65 valued markov process with sample paths in @xmath66 , starting at @xmath67 , and having infinitesimal generator @xmath68 given as @xmath69 \mu_1^{(n)}(k ) \nonumber\\[-8pt]\\[-8pt ] & & { } + \lambda_2^{(n ) } n^2 x y \sum _ { k=0}^\infty \biggl[\phi \biggl(x , y+ \frac{k-1}{n},z \biggr)-\phi(\mathbf w ) \biggr]\mu_2^{(n)}(k),\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath70 and @xmath71 . from the definition of the generator we see that , for each @xmath72 , given @xmath73 , the process jumps to @xmath74 with rate @xmath75 and to @xmath76 with rate @xmath77 , except when @xmath78 and @xmath79 , in which case the latter jump is to @xmath80 with rate @xmath81 . this property of the generator at @xmath79 accounts for the instantaneous replenishment of the ( unscaled ) catalyst population to level @xmath2 , whenever the catalyst drops below @xmath2 . for @xmath82 , let @xmath83 we make the following basic assumption on the parameters of the branching rates and offspring distributions as well as on the initial configurations of the catalyst and reactant populations : [ conditioncr ] for @xmath82 and for @xmath84 , @xmath85 and @xmath86 . for @xmath82 , as @xmath57 , @xmath87 , @xmath88 and @xmath89 . for @xmath82 and for every @xmath90 , @xmath91 as @xmath57 , @xmath92 condition [ conditioncr ] and the form of the generator in ( [ eqgeneratorofwholeprocess ] ) ensure that the scaled catalyst and reactant processes transition on comparable time scales , namely @xmath93 . in order to state the limit theorem for @xmath94 , we need some notation and definitions associated with the one - dimensional skorohod map with reflection at 1 . let @xmath95 be defined as @xmath96 the function @xmath97 , known as skorohod map , can be characterized as follows ; see , for example , appendix b in @xcite and references therein : if @xmath98 are such that ( i ) @xmath99 , ( ii ) @xmath100 , ( iii ) @xmath101 , ( iv ) @xmath102 is nondecreasing , @xmath103 , and @xmath104 , then @xmath105 and @xmath106 . the process @xmath102 can be regarded as the reflection term that is applied to the original trajectory @xmath107 to produce a trajectory @xmath108 that is constrained to @xmath4 . from the definition of the skorohod map and using the triangle inequality , we get the following lipschitz property : for @xmath109 , @xmath110 the diffusion limit of @xmath111 will be the process @xmath112 , starting at @xmath113 , which is given through a system of stochastic integral equations as in the following proposition . [ propuniqunessofx , y ] let @xmath114 be a filtered probability space on which are given independent standard @xmath115 brownian motions @xmath116 and @xmath117 . let @xmath118 be square integrable @xmath119 measurable random variables with values in @xmath4 and @xmath32 , respectively . then the following system of stochastic integral equations has a unique strong solution : @xmath120 where @xmath97 is the skorohod map defined in ( [ eqskorohodmap ] ) . in the above proposition , by a strong solution of ( [ eqx])([eqeta ] ) , we mean an @xmath121-adapted continuous process @xmath122 with values in @xmath123 that satisfies ( [ eqx])([eqeta ] ) . the following is the main result of this section . [ thmcrdiffusion ] suppose condition [ conditioncr ] holds . the process @xmath124 converges weakly in @xmath125 to the process @xmath112 given in proposition [ propuniqunessofx , y ] with @xmath126 . proposition [ propuniqunessofx , y ] follows by standard arguments , so its proof is relegated to the . theorem [ thmcrdiffusion ] will be proved in section [ sec6 ] . stochastic averaging results in this work rely on understanding the time asymptotic behavior of the catalyst process . such behavior , of course , is also of independent interest . we begin with the following result on the stationary distribution of @xmath127 , where @xmath127 is the reflected diffusion from proposition [ propuniqunessofx , y ] , approximating the catalyst dynamics . the proof uses an extension of the echeverria criterion for stationary distributions of diffusions to the setting of constrained diffusions ; see section [ secproofstationarydistrofx ] . we will make the following additional assumption . recall the constants @xmath128 and @xmath129 introduced in condition [ conditioncr ] . [ conditionc1 ] for all @xmath84 , @xmath130 and @xmath131 . [ propstationarydistrofx ] suppose condition [ conditionc1 ] holds . the process @xmath127 defined through ( [ eqx ] ) has a unique stationary distribution , @xmath132 , which has density @xmath133 where @xmath134 . the following result shows that the time asymptotic behavior of the catalyst population is well approximated by that of its diffusion approximation given through ( [ eqx ] ) . we make the following additional assumption on the moment generating function of the offspring distribution , which will allow us to construct certain `` uniform lyapunov functions '' that play a key role in the analysis ; see theorem [ thmintegratingtillreturntime ] and the function @xmath135 defined in ( [ lyapfn ] ) . [ conditionmoment ] for some @xmath136 , @xmath137 [ thmtightnessandconvergenceofnu^n1 ] suppose conditions [ conditioncr ] , [ conditionc1 ] and [ conditionmoment ] hold . then , for each @xmath84 , the process @xmath138 has a unique stationary distribution @xmath139 , and the family @xmath140 is tight . as @xmath57 , @xmath139 converges weakly to @xmath132 . proposition [ propstationarydistrofx ] and theorem [ thmtightnessandconvergenceofnu^n1 ] will be proved in section [ secproofofasymptoticbehaviorofthecatalystpopulation ] . as noted in section [ secdiffusionlimit ] , the catalyst and reactant populations whose scaled evolution is described through ( [ eqgeneratorofwholeprocess ] ) transition on comparable time scales . in situations in which the catalyst evolves `` much faster '' than the reactant , one can hope to find a simplified model that captures the dynamics of the reactant population in a more economical fashion . one would expect that the reactant population can be approximated by a diffusion whose coefficients depend on the catalyst only through the catalyst s stationary distribution . indeed , we will show that the ( scaled ) reactant population can be approximated by the solution of @xmath141 where @xmath142 . such model reductions ( see @xcite and references therein for the setting of chemical reaction networks ) not only help in better understanding the dynamics of the system but also help in reducing computational costs in simulations . in this section we will consider such stochastic averaging results in two model settings . first , in section [ secstochaveragingindiffusionsetting ] , we consider the simpler setting where the population mass evolutions are described through ( reflected ) stochastic integral equations and a scaling parameter in the coefficients of the model distinguishes the time scales of the two processes . in section [ secstochasticaveragingforscaledbranchingprocesses ] we will consider a setting which captures the underlying physical dynamics more accurately in the sense that the mass processes are described in terms of continuous time branching processes , rather than diffusions.=1 in this section we consider the setting where the catalyst and reactant populations evolve according to ( reflected ) diffusions similar to @xmath127 and @xmath143 from proposition [ propuniqunessofx , y ] , but where the evolution of the catalyst is accelerated by a factor of @xmath144 such that @xmath145 as @xmath146 ( i.e. , drift and diffusion coefficients are scaled by @xmath144 ) . more precisely , we consider a system of catalyst and reactant populations that are given as solutions of the following system of stochastic integral equations : for @xmath42 , @xmath147 where @xmath148 , @xmath149 , @xmath150 , @xmath116 and @xmath117 are independent standard brownian motions , and @xmath97 is the skorohod map described above proposition [ propuniqunessofx , y ] . the following result says that if @xmath131 , then the reactant population process @xmath151 , which is given through a coupled two - dimensional system , can be well approximated by the one - dimensional diffusion @xmath152 in ( [ eqchecky ] ) , whose coefficients are given in terms of the stationary distribution of the catalyst process . [ thmfastcatalystweaklimit ] suppose condition [ conditionc1 ] holds . the process @xmath153 converges weakly in @xmath31 to the process @xmath152 . the proof of theorem [ thmfastcatalystweaklimit ] is given in section [ secdiffusionlimitofthereactantunderfastcatalystdynamics ] . we now consider stochastic averaging for the setting where the catalyst and reactant populations are described through branching processes . consider catalyst and reactant populations evolving according to the branching processes introduced in section [ secdiffusionlimit ] , but where the catalyst evolution is sped up by a factor of @xmath144 such that @xmath145 monotonically as @xmath146 . that is , we consider a sequence of catalyst populations @xmath154 , @xmath42 , where @xmath1 are the branching processes introduced in section [ secdiffusionlimit ] . the reactant population evolves according to a branching process , @xmath155 , whose branching rate , as before , is of the order of the current total mass of the catalyst population , @xmath156 . the infinitesimal generator @xmath157 of the scaled process @xmath158 is given as @xmath159\mu_1^{(n)}(k ) \nonumber\\[-8pt]\\[-8pt ] & & { } + \lambda_2^{(n ) } n^2 x y \sum _ { k=0}^\infty \biggl[\phi \biggl(x , y+\frac{k-1}{n } \biggr)-\phi(x , y ) \biggr]\mu_2^{(n)}(k),\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath160 and @xmath161 . we note that a key difference between the generators @xmath157 above and @xmath162 in ( [ eqgeneratorofwholeprocess ] ) is the extra factor of @xmath144 in the first term of ( [ eqcheckg^n ] ) , which says that , for large @xmath2 , the catalyst dynamics are much faster than that of the reactant . we will show in theorem [ fastcatalystbpaveraging ] that the reactant population process @xmath151 can be well approximated by the one - dimensional diffusion @xmath152 in ( [ eqchecky ] ) . once again , the result provides a model reduction that is potentially useful for simulations and also for a general qualitative understanding of reactant dynamics near criticality . [ fastcatalystbpaveraging ] suppose conditions [ conditioncr ] , [ conditionc1 ] and [ conditionmoment ] hold . then , as @xmath57 , @xmath163 converges weakly in @xmath164 to the process @xmath152 . we will prove the above theorem in section [ secdiffusionlimitofthereactantunderfastcatalystdynamics ] . in this section we collect several auxiliary results , which will be used in the proofs of our main results . recall that the quadratic covariation ( or bracket process ) of two semimartingales @xmath44 and @xmath45 is the process @xmath46_t\}_{t\in{\mathbb{r}}_+}$ ] defined by @xmath165_t:=\xi_t\zeta_t-\int _ 0^t \xi_{s- } \,d \zeta_s-\int_0^t \zeta_{s- } \,d\xi_s,\qquad t\geq0,\ ] ] where @xmath166 . the predictable quadratic covariation of @xmath44 and @xmath45 is the unique predictable process @xmath167 such that @xmath46_t-\langle\xi,\zeta\rangle_t\}_{t\in{\mathbb{r}}_+}$ ] is a local martingale . if @xmath168 , then @xmath169\equiv[\xi,\xi ] $ ] and @xmath170 are , respectively , the quadratic and predictable quadratic variation processes of @xmath44 . for @xmath171 , let @xmath172 , @xmath173 , and @xmath174 . note that for a locally bounded measurable function @xmath20 on @xmath18 @xmath175 is a local martingale with respect to the filtration @xmath176 . for the rest of the paper , we suppress the filtration , and simply refer to @xmath177 as a local martingale . let @xmath178 this process will play the role of the reflection term in the dynamics of the catalyst , arising from the controlled immigration . the following tightness result will be used in the weak convergence proofs . [ lemtighnessofcatalyst - reactant ] suppose conditions [ conditioncr ] and [ conditionc1 ] hold . then the family @xmath179 is tight in @xmath180 . if additionally condition [ conditionmoment ] holds , then the family @xmath181 is tight in @xmath182 . the proof of proposition [ lemtighnessofcatalyst - reactant ] will be based on the following results . lemma [ lemrepresentationofcrprocesses ] below gives some useful representations for the catalyst and reactant processes . lemmas [ lemevofsquaredsuprema][lemevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedprocesses ] and corollary [ corevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedhatx^n ] provide moment bounds that are useful for arguing tightness . proofs of these results are given in section [ secproofsofauxresults ] . [ lemrepresentationofcrprocesses ] suppose condition [ conditioncr ] holds . the process @xmath94 can be represented as @xmath183\\[-8pt ] & = & \gamma \biggl(\hat x_0^{(n)}+c_1^{(n ) } \lambda_1^{(n)}\int_0^\cdot \hat x_s^{(n)}\,ds+m_\cdot^{(n ) } ( \phi_1 ) \biggr ) ( t)\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath184 moreover , for @xmath185 , @xmath186\\[-8pt ] & \le&\lambda_1^{(n)}\alpha_1^{(n ) } \int_0^t\hat x_s^{(n)}\,ds\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath187 let @xmath188 then we have the following second moment estimate . [ lemevofsquaredsuprema ] suppose conditions [ conditioncr ] and hold . then there is a @xmath189 such that for all @xmath84 and @xmath190 , @xmath191 and for each @xmath192 , @xmath193 where @xmath194 . in order to study properties of invariant measures of @xmath195 , it will be convenient to allow the initial random variable @xmath196 to have an arbitrary distribution on @xmath197 . when @xmath198 has distribution @xmath199 on @xmath197 , we will denote the corresponding probability and expectation operator by @xmath200 and @xmath201 , respectively . if @xmath202 for some , we will instead write @xmath203 and @xmath204 , respectively . when considering an initial condition @xmath205 for @xmath195 , @xmath205 will always be in @xmath197 , although this will frequently be suppressed in the notation . the symbols @xmath206 and @xmath207 ( without any subscripts ) will correspond to the initial distribution as in condition [ conditioncr ] . [ lemexpmomentsonfinitetime ] suppose conditions [ conditioncr ] and , [ conditionc1 ] and [ conditionmoment ] hold . then there exist @xmath208 such that for every @xmath209 , @xmath210 [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] suppose conditions [ conditioncr ] and , [ conditionc1 ] and [ conditionmoment ] hold . then there exist @xmath211 such that for every @xmath212 , @xmath84 and @xmath42 , @xmath213 the following is immediate from lemmas [ lemevofsquaredsuprema ] and [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] . [ corevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedhatx^n ] suppose conditions [ conditioncr ] and , [ conditionc1 ] and [ conditionmoment ] hold . let @xmath214 be as in lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] and @xmath215 . then there exists a @xmath216 such that for all @xmath212 and @xmath84 , @xmath217 the next lemma follows by combining lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] with arguments as in the proof of lemma [ lemevofsquaredsuprema ] . the proof is omitted . [ lemevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedprocesses ] suppose conditions [ conditioncr ] and , [ conditionc1 ] and [ conditionmoment ] hold . let @xmath214 be as in lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] . then for each @xmath190 there are @xmath218 such that for all @xmath84 and @xmath219 , @xmath220 in order to prove weak convergence results for the scaled catalyst and reactant processes , we will need to argue that the limit processes are continuous , which will be a consequence of the following bounds on the jumps . the somewhat stronger estimate on the jumps of the catalyst population in ( [ eqpsupdeltahatx^nt ] ) , below , will be used in the stochastic averaging argument in the proof of theorem [ fastcatalystbpaveraging ] . recall that for a process @xmath221 the jump at instant @xmath39 is defined as @xmath38 and @xmath40 . [ lempsupdeltahatx^nt ] suppose condition [ conditioncr ] holds . fix @xmath222 . then , as , @xmath223 if additionally conditions [ conditionc1 ] and [ conditionmoment ] hold , then , as @xmath57 , @xmath224 in this section we prove the results stated in section [ secauxresults ] . we begin with the proofs of lemmas [ lemrepresentationofcrprocesses][lemevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedprocesses ] . using these results , we will then prove proposition [ lemtighnessofcatalyst - reactant ] . the proof of lemma [ lempsupdeltahatx^nt ] is given at the end . proof of lemma [ lemrepresentationofcrprocesses ] recall that @xmath225 and that for @xmath171 , @xmath226 , @xmath173 , and @xmath174 . from ( [ locmart ] ) , @xmath227 using ( [ eqgeneratorofwholeprocess ] ) , we get @xmath228 next , since @xmath229 , we have @xmath230 and , once more using ( [ eqgeneratorofwholeprocess ] ) , @xmath231 thus with @xmath232 as in ( [ hateta^n ] ) , we get @xmath233 noting that @xmath234 and using ( [ eqhatz^n ] ) , ( [ eqhata^nphi3 ] ) and ( [ eqhatx^n - hatz^n ] ) , we have @xmath235 since @xmath232 is nondecreasing and @xmath236 , we have from the characterization given above ( [ eqskorohodlipschitz ] ) that @xmath237 next , for the reactant population , using similar calculations as for @xmath238 , we get @xmath239 finally , routine calculations then show ( see @xcite , lemma 3.1.3 ) that ( [ eqpqvm^nphi1 ] ) and ( [ eq5.6 ] ) hold . details are omitted . proof of lemma [ lemevofsquaredsuprema ] using ( [ eqpqvm^nphi1 ] ) and doob s inequality , we have @xmath240 next , from ( [ eq5.3 ] ) , @xmath241 the lipschitz continuity of the skorohod map implies @xmath242 letting @xmath243 , we now get @xmath244 combining this with ( [ eqhatn^ndef ] ) and ( [ eq5.20 ] ) , we obtain @xmath245 . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] using gronwall s inequality , we get , since @xmath246 , @xmath247 where @xmath248 . since @xmath249 and @xmath250 converge as @xmath57 , we have that for some @xmath189 and all @xmath251 @xmath252 using ( [ eq5.23 ] ) in ( [ eq5.20 ] ) , ( [ eq5.22 ] ) and ( [ eqhatx^nintemsofmartandeta ] ) , we have the estimate in ( [ eqevofsquaredsuprema ] ) by choosing @xmath253 sufficiently large . we next establish ( [ eqestimateonhaty^n ] ) . using doob s inequality once more and applying ( [ eq5.6 ] ) , we have @xmath254 thus , by ( [ eqhaty^nb^n2 ] ) , @xmath255\int_0^t e \bigl(\bigl|\hat y^{(n)}\bigr|_{*,s\wedge\sigma^{(n)}_k}^2 \bigr)\,ds \biggr).\end{aligned}\ ] ] the estimate in ( [ eqestimateonhaty^n ] ) now follows by choosing @xmath253 sufficiently large and applying gronwall s inequality . proof of lemma [ lemexpmomentsonfinitetime ] first we show , using conditions [ conditioncr](i ) and ( ii ) , [ conditionc1 ] and [ conditionmoment ] , that there are @xmath256 such that for all @xmath257 $ ] and @xmath258\mu^{(n)}_1(k ) \le-\delta d_1.\ ] ] note that @xmath259\mu^{(n)}_1(k)\\ & & \qquad = n^2 \sum_{k=0}^\infty \biggl(\sum _ { l=1}^\infty\frac { 1}{l ! } \biggl ( \frac{(k-1)\delta}{n } \biggr)^l \biggr)\mu^{(n)}_1(k ) \\ & & \qquad= n\delta \biggl(\sum_{k=0}^\infty k \mu^{(n)}_1(k)-1 \biggr ) + \frac { 1}{2 } \delta^2\sum_{k=0}^\infty(k-1)^2 \mu^{(n)}_1(k ) \\ & & \qquad\quad { } + n^2\sum_{k=0}^\infty \biggl ( \sum_{l=3}^\infty\frac { 1}{l ! } \biggl ( \frac{(k-1)\delta}{n } \biggr)^l \biggr)\mu^{(n)}_1(k).\end{aligned}\ ] ] now , as @xmath57 , @xmath260 and @xmath261 noting that @xmath130 , we can choose @xmath262 sufficiently small , and @xmath263 suitably , such that ( [ eqinstep1 ] ) holds . for @xmath264 as above and @xmath265 , let @xmath266 and @xmath267\mu^{(n)}_1(k ) \bigr)1_{\{\hat x^{(n)}_s > 1\}}\,ds.\ ] ] note that , by ( [ eqinstep1 ] ) , for any @xmath268 , @xmath269\\[-8pt ] & \le&-\delta d_1\lambda^{(n)}_1 \int _ u^t \hat x^{(n)}_s 1_{\{\hat x^{(n)}_s>1\}}\,ds.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] moreover , @xmath270 the first inequality in the last display is immediate , the second inequality can be seen as follows : @xmath271 by ( [ eqinstep1 ] ) , the first term on the right - hand side of the last display is smaller or equal to @xmath272 . thus @xmath273 we now argue that @xmath274 is a local martingale . let @xmath275 and @xmath276 here @xmath277 is the generator of @xmath195 , that is , for @xmath278 , @xmath279 \mu_1^{(n)}(k).\ ] ] note that @xmath280 \mu^{(n)}_1(k ) \bigr)1_{\{x>1\}}\ ] ] and thus @xmath281 also , @xmath282 consider the markov process @xmath283 defined by @xmath284 denote by @xmath285 the generator of @xmath283 . then the action of the generator on the function @xmath286 with @xmath275 and @xmath287 is given by @xmath288 using ( [ eq5.28 ] ) we now have that @xmath289 is a local martingale . from ( [ eq5.29 ] ) we now see that the last expression equals @xmath290 , @xmath42 , which is thus a local martingale . we next show that for every @xmath209 , @xmath265 and @xmath42 , @xmath291 note that @xmath292\\[-12pt ] & = & \biggl(m^{(n),\delta}_t+\alpha^{(n)}_\delta \int_0^t e^{-\beta ^{(n),\delta}_s}\,d\hat \eta^{(n)}_s \biggr)e^{\beta^{(n),\delta}_t}.\nonumber \ ] ] applying it s formula and using ( [ eqinstep1 ] ) , ( [ eq5.28 ] ) and ( [ eq5.31 ] ) , we see that @xmath293 the estimate in ( [ eq5.30 ] ) now follows by combining the above inequality with lemma [ lemevofsquaredsuprema ] and ( [ eqestimatealpha^bdelta ] ) . fix @xmath209 , @xmath294 and @xmath295 . then , since @xmath296 for all @xmath42 , we have for @xmath297 , @xmath298 where the last inequality follows on noting that @xmath299 is a submartingale and applying doob s inequality . now from ( [ eqestimatebeta^bdelta ] ) and ( [ eq5.30 ] ) , @xmath300 choose @xmath301 . then , by combining the above estimates , we can find a @xmath302 such that for all @xmath294 , @xmath84 and @xmath295 @xmath303^{1/2}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] dividing both sides by @xmath304^{1/2}$ ] yields @xmath305^{1/2}\le d_4(\delta,\rho , m)\ ] ] for any @xmath294 and @xmath84 . the result follows . proof of lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] for @xmath306 , define @xmath307 and @xmath308 from ( [ eqinstep1 ] ) , we have , for some @xmath309 , @xmath310 for all @xmath265 [ with @xmath264 as above ( [ eqinstep1 ] ) ] and @xmath311 . observing that with @xmath275 , @xmath312 , where @xmath313 is the generator of @xmath195 defined in ( [ eq5.27 ] ) , we have that @xmath314 is a local martingale . fix @xmath214 and @xmath315 as in the statement of lemma [ lemexpmomentsonfinitetime ] . without loss of generality , we can assume that @xmath265 . note that on the set @xmath316 we have @xmath317&\le&\delta \bigl[\hat x^{(n)}_{j\rho}- \hat x^{(n)}_{(j-1)\rho}\bigr]-\int_{(j-1)\rho } ^{j\rho}b^{(n)}_\delta \bigl(\hat x^{(n)}_s\bigr)\,ds-\delta\kappa\rho \nonumber\\[-8pt]\\[-8pt ] & \equiv & v^{(n)}_j-\delta\kappa\rho.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] fix @xmath39 , and let @xmath318 be such that @xmath319 . then , similarly , on the set @xmath320 @xmath321\le v^{(n)}_{n}(t)$ ] , where @xmath322-\int_{(j-1)\rho}^{t}b^{(n)}_\delta \bigl(\hat x^{(n)}_s\bigr)\,ds.\ ] ] now , for a fixed @xmath323 , let @xmath324 be such that @xmath325 is the last interval in which @xmath195 visits 1 before time @xmath326 . we set @xmath327 if 1 is not visited before time @xmath326 . we distinguish between the cases @xmath328 , @xmath329 and @xmath327 , where the latter corresponds to the case where 1 is not visited before time @xmath326 . _ case _ 1 : @xmath328 . in this case @xmath330 for @xmath331 , let @xmath332 and @xmath333.\ ] ] then @xmath334 combining the above estimates , we have @xmath335 thus , in this case @xmath336 where by convention @xmath337 for @xmath338 and @xmath339 . _ case _ 2 : @xmath327 . in this case , 1 is not visited before time @xmath326 and thus @xmath340 _ case _ 3 : @xmath329 . suppose first that there is an @xmath341 $ ] such that @xmath342 . it then follows that @xmath343 now suppose that there is no such @xmath341 $ ] . define @xmath344 to be such that @xmath345 is the last interval in which @xmath195 visits 1 before @xmath346 . once again we set @xmath347 if there is no such interval . if @xmath347 , we get exactly as in case 2 that @xmath348 if @xmath349 , then @xmath350 combining the three cases , we have @xmath351 thus , for any @xmath352 , @xmath353 \biggr ) e^{-\delta\kappa\rho(n - l-1 ) } \biggr]\\ & & \qquad\quad\hspace*{227.5pt}{}+ e_x\bigl(e^{\delta\theta ^{(n)}_n } \bigr ) \biggr).\end{aligned}\ ] ] recalling @xmath354 from ( [ equ^nmart ] ) and using its martingale property , we get @xmath355\\[-8pt ] & \le & e^{-m_0}e^{(1+x)\delta } \,d(\delta,\rho,1 ) \biggl(1 + \frac { 1}{1-e^{-\delta\kappa\rho } } \biggr),\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the last inequality follows from lemma [ lemexpmomentsonfinitetime ] and the observation that @xmath356 where @xmath357 is as in ( [ eqtheta^nj ] ) . finally , from ( [ eq5.36 ] ) , we get that for all @xmath42 and @xmath84 @xmath358 where @xmath359 . the result follows . proof of proposition [ lemtighnessofcatalyst - reactant ] we will first consider the second part of the proposition . we begin by showing that @xmath360 is tight . for that , in view of ( [ eqevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedprocesses ] ) , it suffices to show that the following condition ( aldous kurtz criterion ) holds : for each @xmath361 and @xmath362 there are @xmath262 and @xmath363 such that for all stopping times @xmath364 with @xmath365 , we have @xmath366 let @xmath367 be given . note that @xmath368 by ( [ eqestimateofshiftedhatx^noverfinitetime ] ) we have , for @xmath264 sufficiently small , @xmath369 it remains to prove that , for some @xmath262 , @xmath370 using the martingale property of @xmath371 , @xmath372 and , using ( [ eqpqvm^nphi1 ] ) , @xmath373 now , using ( [ eqestimateofshiftedhatx^noverfinitetime ] ) once more , we can choose @xmath262 such that ( [ eq5.40 ] ) holds . this proves tightness of @xmath360 and , using the continuity property of the skorohod map ( from @xmath374 to @xmath375 ) , that of @xmath376 and @xmath377 . tightness of @xmath378 now follows by using the uniform estimate in lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] . now we consider the first part of the proposition . tightness of @xmath379 follows as before . we now consider @xmath380 . fix @xmath381 . using ( [ eqestimateonhaty^n ] ) , we get , for @xmath382 , @xmath383 & \leq&\frac{e ( \sup_{t\leq t}(\hat y^{(n)}_{\sigma ^{(n)}_k\wedge t})^2 ) } { \tilde k^2}+p \bigl(\sup_{t\leq t}\bigl(\hat x^{(n)}_t\bigr)\geq k \bigr ) \\[-2pt ] & \leq&\frac{\exp(kt^2 k^2 ) ( y^{(n)}_0)^2}{\tilde k^2}+\frac{e ( \sup_{t\leq t}(\hat x^{(n)}_t)^2 ) } { k^2}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] using ( [ eqevofsquaredsuprema ] ) , we can choose @xmath17 such that @xmath384 now choose @xmath385 such that @xmath386 the last two displays imply @xmath387 , and since @xmath381 is arbitrary , the tightness of the random variables @xmath388 , for each @xmath389 , follows . to establish the tightness of the processes @xmath390 , it now suffices to show that for each @xmath361 and @xmath391 there are @xmath262 and @xmath363 such that for all stopping times @xmath364 with @xmath365 , we have @xmath392 fix @xmath393 . then , for any @xmath394 , @xmath395 & & \qquad \leq p \bigl(\bigl|\hat y^{(n)}_{(\tau_n+\theta)\wedge\sigma ^{(n)}_k}-\hat y^{(n)}_{\tau_n\wedge\sigma^{(n)}_k}\bigr| \geq\gamma \bigr)+p \bigl(\sigma^{(n)}_k\leq m+1 \bigr).\end{aligned}\ ] ] taking @xmath396 and @xmath17 as in ( [ eqsupe|x^n|k ] ) , we have @xmath397 for all @xmath84 . for the first term on the right - hand side of the last display , we get , using ( [ eqhaty^nb^n2 ] ) and that @xmath398 , @xmath399 & & \qquad \leq p \biggl(\biggl|c_2^{(n)}\lambda^{(n)}_2 \int_{\tau _ n\wedge\sigma^{(n)}_k}^{(\tau_n+\theta)\wedge\sigma^{(n)}_k}\hat y^{(n)}_s \,ds\biggr|\geq\frac{\gamma}{2k } \biggr ) \\[-2pt ] & & \qquad\quad { } + p \biggl(\bigl|m^{(n)}_{(\tau_n+\theta)\wedge \sigma^{(n)}_k}(\phi_2)-m^{(n)}_{\tau_n\wedge\sigma^{(n)}_k } ( \phi_2)\bigr|\geq\frac{\gamma}{2 } \biggr).\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the first term on the right - hand side can be bounded as follows : @xmath400 where @xmath253 is the constant from ( [ eqestimateonhaty^n ] ) . thus , for @xmath264 sufficiently small , we get @xmath401 the second term on the right - hand side of ( [ eq5.43 ] ) can be bounded as follows : @xmath402 using ( [ eqestimateonhaty^n ] ) once more , we have that , for @xmath264 sufficiently small , the second term in ( [ eq5.43 ] ) is bounded by @xmath403 . combining the above estimates , we now see that ( [ eq5.42 ] ) holds , and thus tightness of @xmath404 follows . proof of lemma [ lempsupdeltahatx^nt ] consider ( [ eqpsupdeltahatx^nt ] ) . let @xmath405 be the number of deaths of particles of the ( unscaled ) process @xmath1 in the time interval @xmath406 $ ] . . then @xmath408 by corollary [ corevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedhatx^n ] , we can choose @xmath409 such that @xmath410 for @xmath219 and @xmath84 . next , consider @xmath411 note that on the set @xmath412 the branching rates of @xmath1 are bounded during the time interval @xmath406 $ ] , uniformly in @xmath413 and @xmath2 , and thus we can choose a @xmath414 such that for @xmath219 and @xmath84 @xmath415 finally , let , for @xmath84 , @xmath416 be i.i.d . random variables distributed as @xmath417 . then , since the variance of the offspring distribution converges , we have for @xmath363 sufficiently large and all @xmath418 , @xmath419 combining the above estimates , ( [ eqpsupdeltahatx^nt ] ) follows . the limit in ( [ eqpsupdeltahaty^nt ] ) can be established similarly , using lemma [ lemevofsquaredsuprema ] instead of corollary [ corevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedhatx^n ] ; the proof is therefore omitted . the following martingale characterization result will be useful in the proof of theorem [ thmcrdiffusion ] . the proof is standard and is omitted ; see @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and theorem 5.3 of @xcite . for @xmath420 , let @xmath421 let @xmath422 and @xmath423 be the corresponding borel @xmath27-field ( with respect to the skorohod topology ) . denote by @xmath424 the canonical filtration on @xmath425 , that is , @xmath426 , where @xmath427 for @xmath428 . finally , let @xmath429 , @xmath173 , be the coordinate processes , that is , @xmath430 . [ thmmartingalecharacterization ] let @xmath431 be a probability measure on @xmath432 under which the following hold a.s . : @xmath433 is a nondecreasing , continuous process , and @xmath434 ; @xmath435 is an @xmath436 valued continuous process ; @xmath437 ; for all @xmath420 @xmath438 is an @xmath439 martingale ; @xmath440,where @xmath441 and @xmath442 are as in proposition [ propuniqunessofx , y ] . then @xmath443 . proof of theorem [ thmcrdiffusion ] recall that for @xmath420 , we have @xmath444 where @xmath445 is a martingale , and @xmath446 is as defined in ( [ eqgeneratorofwholeprocess ] ) . also note that @xmath447 can be rewritten as @xmath448 where @xmath449\mu_1^{(n)}(k ) \\ & & { } + \lambda_2^{(n ) } n^2 x y \sum _ { k=0}^\infty \biggl[\phi \biggl(x , y+\frac{k-1}{n } \biggr)-\phi(x , y ) \biggr]\mu_2^{(n)}(k)\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath450 thus , using ( [ hateta^n ] ) , ( [ eq6.1 ] ) can be rewritten as @xmath451 recall the path space @xmath452 introduced above theorem [ thmmartingalecharacterization ] . denote by @xmath453 the measure induced by @xmath454 on @xmath425 and by @xmath455 the corresponding expectation . from proposition [ lemtighnessofcatalyst - reactant ] , @xmath456 is tight . let @xmath431 be a limit point of @xmath457 along some subsequence @xmath458 . in order to complete the proof , it suffices to show that under @xmath431 properties ( i)(v ) in theorem [ thmmartingalecharacterization ] hold almost surely . property ( i ) is immediate from the fact that @xmath232 is nondecreasing and continuous with initial value 0 for each @xmath2 . also , property ( v ) is immediate from the fact that @xmath459 , a.s . , for each @xmath2 . next , consider property ( ii ) . the continuity of @xmath460 and @xmath461 follows by ( [ eqpsupdeltahaty^nt ] ) ; see @xcite , proposition vi.3.26 , page 315 . to see ( iii ) , consider , for @xmath462 , continuous bounded test functions @xmath463 such that @xmath464 note that , for each @xmath84 , @xmath465 and thus , for each @xmath462 , @xmath466 consequently , for each @xmath462 , @xmath467 , almost surely w.r.t . the property in ( iii ) now follows on sending @xmath468 . finally , we consider part ( iv ) . it suffices to show that for every @xmath469 @xmath470 where @xmath471 is an arbitrary bounded , continuous , @xmath472 measurable map . now fix such @xmath473 and @xmath107 . then by weak convergence of @xmath474 to @xmath431 and using the moment bound in lemma [ lemevofsquaredsuprema ] , @xmath475 to complete the proof , it suffices to show that the limit on the left - hand side above is 0 . in view of the martingale property in ( [ eq6.1 ] ) , to show this , it suffices to prove that for @xmath420 , @xmath476 and @xmath477 the latter is immediate upon using the smoothness of @xmath108 and the moment estimate for @xmath232 in ( [ eqevofsquaredsuprema ] ) . for ( [ eqh4forsingletypecont ] ) , we rewrite @xmath478 using a taylor expansion as follows : @xmath479\mu_1^{(n)}(k ) \\ & & \qquad\quad { } + \lambda_2^{(n ) } n^2 xy \sum _ { k=0}^\infty \biggl[\frac { k-1}{n } \,\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\phi(x , y)+\frac{1}{2 } \biggl(\frac{k-1}{n } \biggr)^2\,\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}\phi(x , y ) \biggr]\mu_2^{(n)}(k ) \\ & & \qquad\quad { } + r^{(n)}(x , y ) \\ & & \qquad = c_1^{(n)}\lambda_1^{(n ) } x \,\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\phi ( x , y)+\frac{1}{2}\alpha_1^{(n ) } \lambda_1^{(n ) } x \,\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\phi(x , y ) \\ & & \qquad\quad { } + c_2^{(n ) } \lambda_2^{(n ) } x y \,\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\phi(x , y)+\frac{1}{2}\alpha_2^{(n ) } \lambda_2^{(n ) } x y \,\frac { \partial^2}{\partial y^2}\phi(x , y)+r^{(n)}(x , y),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the term @xmath480 is a remainder term , which , using part ( iii ) of condition [ conditioncr ] , is seen to satisfy @xmath481 as @xmath57 , for any @xmath482 . furthermore , using the compact support property of @xmath483 , it follows that @xmath484 . next note that @xmath485 and therefore , in view of condition [ conditioncr ] , @xmath486 once more using the compact support property of @xmath108 , it follows that @xmath487 combining the above estimates , we have ( [ eqh4forsingletypecont ] ) , and the result follows . uniqueness of the invariant measure of @xmath127 is an immediate consequence of the nondegeneracy of the diffusion coefficient ( note that @xmath488 ) . for existence , we will apply an extension of the well - known echeverria criterion for invariant measures of markov processes @xcite and theorem 5.7 of @xcite . this criterion , in the current context , says that in order to establish that a probability measure @xmath489 is an invariant measure for @xmath127 , it suffices to verify that for some @xmath490 and all @xmath491 @xmath492 where @xmath493 we now show that ( [ eqewk - criterion ] ) holds with @xmath494 and @xmath495 . for @xmath496 and @xmath497 as in ( [ eqdensityofnu1 ] ) , @xmath498 thus ( [ eqewk - criterion ] ) follows . throughout this section we assume that conditions [ conditioncr ] , [ conditionc1 ] and [ conditionmoment ] hold . this will not be explicitly noted in the statements of the results . existence of a stationary distribution @xmath139 of the @xmath499 valued markov process @xmath195 follows from the tightness of @xmath500 , which is a consequence of lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] . the uniqueness of the stationary distribution follows from the irreducibility of @xmath195 . in order to establish the tightness of the sequence @xmath140 , we will use the following uniform in @xmath2 moment stability estimate for @xmath195 . [ thmmomentstability ] there is a @xmath501 such that for all @xmath502 and @xmath503 , @xmath504 fix an @xmath505 , and let @xmath506 . observe that if @xmath507 for some @xmath318 , then , following arguments as in the proof of lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] , for @xmath508 , @xmath509 thus we have that @xmath510 where @xmath511 , @xmath82 . the above estimate along with lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] implies , for @xmath84 , @xmath512 where @xmath513 is as in lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] and @xmath514 is some constant , independent of @xmath2 . fix @xmath503 . then , for some @xmath515 , we have @xmath516 choose @xmath517 large enough such that @xmath518 . then for @xmath519 @xmath520 the result follows . as a consequence of theorem [ thmmomentstability ] , we have the following result . for @xmath521 , define the return time to a compact set @xmath522 by @xmath523 there are @xmath524 and a compact set @xmath522 such that @xmath525 note that @xmath526 since @xmath527 . applying theorem [ thmmomentstability ] with @xmath528 , we have that there is an @xmath529 such that with @xmath530 , for all @xmath531 , @xmath532 where @xmath517 is as in theorem [ thmmomentstability ] . let @xmath533 and @xmath534 consider a sequence of stopping times defined as follows : @xmath535 let @xmath536 , and @xmath537 then @xmath538 let @xmath539 . we claim that there is a @xmath540 such that for all @xmath541 , @xmath542 @xmath543 due to the strong markov property , to prove the claim it suffices to show that for some @xmath540 and for all @xmath544 @xmath545 note that for @xmath311 , @xmath546 , where @xmath547 . using this bound along with lemma [ lemevofsquaredsuprema ] , we get , for some @xmath548 , @xmath549 the claim follows . from the estimate ( [ eqclaimaa ] ) , we now have @xmath550 note that @xmath551 is a markov chain with transition probability kernel @xmath552 where @xmath553 is the transition probability kernel for @xmath138 . using ( [ eqexpmomentoutsidecompact ] ) and lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] , we get that for any @xmath529 there exists a @xmath554 such that for all @xmath555 @xmath556\\[-8pt ] & & { } + \sup_n \int_1^\infty y^3 p^{(n)}_{t_0 l}(x , dy ) 1_{\{x\leq l\ } } \nonumber\\ & \leq & x^3-\frac{1}{2}x^3+\tilde b 1_{[0,l]}(x ) . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the above inequality along with theorem 14.2.2 of @xcite yields @xmath557 } \bigl(\hat x^{(n)}_{\sigma ^{(n)}_k } \bigr ) \biggr ) \biggr ) \\ & = & 2 \bigl(x^3+\tilde b 1_{[0,l]}(x ) \bigr)\le\tilde c x^3,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the equality in the last display follows from the fact that @xmath558 for @xmath559 . the result follows now on combining the last estimate with ( [ eq7.7 ] ) . the following theorem is proved exactly as proposition 5.4 of @xcite . the proof is omitted . [ thmestimatefx^nbyv^n ] let @xmath560 be a measurable function . define for @xmath561 and a compact set @xmath522 @xmath562 if @xmath563 is everywhere finite and uniformly bounded on @xmath564 , then there exists a @xmath565 such that for all @xmath566 @xmath567 we now return to the proof of theorem [ thmtightnessandconvergenceofnu^n1 ] and establish the tightness of @xmath140 . we will apply theorem [ thmestimatefx^nbyv^n ] with @xmath568 , and @xmath569 as in theorem [ thmintegratingtillreturntime ] . since @xmath139 is an invariant measure for @xmath195 , we have for nonnegative , real valued , measurable functions @xmath570 on @xmath4 @xmath571 fix @xmath192 and let @xmath572 . let @xmath573 by ( [ eq7.9 ] ) , we have that @xmath574 . let @xmath575 by the monotone convergence theorem @xmath576 as @xmath577 . we next show that @xmath578 is bounded from below for all @xmath579 : if @xmath580 , then @xmath581 where the last inequality follows from theorem [ thmestimatefx^nbyv^n ] . if @xmath582 , @xmath583 thus @xmath584 for all @xmath311 . by fatou s lemma , we have @xmath585 by theorem [ thmestimatefx^nbyv^n ] we have @xmath586 . combining this with the last display , we have @xmath587 using the invariance property of @xmath139 once more , we see that the first term on the right - hand side above equals @xmath588 , and therefore@xmath589 . this completes the proof of tightness . the tightness of @xmath140 implies that every subsequence of @xmath590 has a convergent subsequence . call such a limit @xmath591 . theorem [ thmcrdiffusion ] and the stationarity of @xmath139 imply that @xmath591 is a stationary distribution of @xmath127 . since the stationary distribution of @xmath127 is unique , we have @xmath592 , which completes the proof.=-1 in order to prove the result , we will verify that the assumptions of theorem ii.1 ( more precisely , those in the remark following theorem ii.1 ) in @xcite , pages 78 and 79 , hold . for this , it suffices to show that for all @xmath192 , @xmath593 , @xmath594 and @xmath595 , there exists a sequence @xmath596 with @xmath597 and @xmath598}\bigl{\vert}e \bigl[\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) \bigl(\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t+h_n } \bigr)-\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t } \bigr)-h_n\check l\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t \bigr ) \bigr ) \bigr]\bigr{\vert}\nonumber\\[-8pt]\\[-8pt ] & & \qquad = o(h_n),\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath599 is given as @xmath600 letting @xmath601 , @xmath42 , we see , using scaling properties of the skorohod map and straight forward martingale characterization results , that @xmath602 has the same probability law as the process @xmath127 that was introduced in proposition [ propuniqunessofx , y ] with initial value @xmath603 . the following uniform moment bound will be used in the proof of theorem [ thmfastcatalystweaklimit ] . [ lemunifmombdx ] there exists a @xmath604 , such that whenever @xmath127 is as in proposition [ propuniqunessofx , y ] with initial value @xmath605 , for some @xmath579 , we have @xmath606 we begin by establishing exponential moment estimates for the increase of @xmath607 over time intervals of length @xmath608 when the process is away from the boundary 1 , where @xmath297 and @xmath609 . fix @xmath610 . let @xmath611 , @xmath612 and @xmath613 . note that in view of condition [ conditionc1 ] , @xmath614 . define @xmath615 and @xmath616 . then @xmath617 where the inequality follows on noting that @xmath618 and @xmath619 . using the super martingale property of the stochastic exponential , we have that the second term on the right - hand side of the last display is bounded by 1 . thus , sending @xmath620 , we have , with @xmath621 , @xmath622 next , for @xmath579 , we have by application of it s formula that for @xmath623 and @xmath624 , @xmath625 where @xmath626 and the last inequality follows by an application of gronwall s lemma and the lipschitz property of the skorohod map ; see ( [ eqskorohodlipschitz ] ) . using the above estimates , we will now establish certain uniform estimates on the tail probabilities of @xmath627 , which will lead to exponential moment estimates at these time points . fix @xmath505 , and let @xmath628 @xmath629 . fix @xmath192 , and let @xmath630 if there is an @xmath631 $ ] such that @xmath632 , and set @xmath633 equal to 0 otherwise . let @xmath634 then @xmath635 . letting @xmath636 , we have , using ( [ eq8.3 ] ) , @xmath637 next note that , from ( [ eq8.4 ] ) , @xmath638 } 1_{\tau_i < i\rho } \bigr)+1=e_x \bigl ( e^{-\delta x_{\tau_i}}1_{\tau _ i < i\rho } e_{x_{\tau_i } } \bigl(e^{\delta x_{i\rho } } \bigr ) \bigr)+1 \\ & \le & e_x \bigl[e^{-\delta x_{\tau_i}}1_{\tau_i < i\rho } \bigl(e^{\delta x_{\tau_i}}+x_{\tau_i } c_1(\rho,\delta ) \bigr ) \bigr]+1\equiv c_2(\rho,\delta)+1.\end{aligned}\ ] ] hence , @xmath639 the last estimate yields , analogously to ( [ eq5.38 ] ) , @xmath640 for some @xmath641 . finally , letting @xmath642 , we have from ( [ eq8.4 ] ) for @xmath643 $ ] , @xmath644 , @xmath645 the result follows . [ remunifmombdcheckx^n ] note that lemma [ lemunifmombdx ] and the scaling property noted above that lemma say that for all @xmath579 @xmath646 we now prove theorem [ thmfastcatalystweaklimit ] by showing ( [ eqstochaveragcriterion ] ) . let , for @xmath594 , @xmath647 then @xmath648 \nonumber \\ & & \qquad = e \biggl[\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) \int_t^{t+h_n } \mathcal{l}_{\check x^{(n)}_s}\phi\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t\bigr)\,ds \biggr ] \\ & & \qquad\quad { } + e \biggl[\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) \int_t^{t+h_n } \bigl(\mathcal{l}_{\check x^{(n)}_s}\phi\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_s \bigr)- \mathcal{l}_{\check x^{(n)}_s}\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t \bigr ) \bigr)\,ds \biggr].\hspace*{-15pt}\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] for the second term , we have , using remark [ remunifmombdcheckx^n ] and the fact that the function @xmath570 is bounded and @xmath108 as well as its derivatives are continuous with bounded support , that @xmath649 } e \biggl|\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) \int_t^{t+h_n } \bigl(\mathcal{l}_{\check x^{(n)}_s } \phi\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_s\bigr)- \mathcal{l}_{\check x^{(n)}_s } \phi\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t\bigr ) \bigr)\,ds \biggr| \nonumber \\ & & \qquad= \sup_{t\in[t_{k+1},t ] } e \biggl|\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1 } , \ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) \nonumber\\ & & \qquad\quad\hspace*{48pt}{}\times\int_t^{t+h_n } \biggl[c_2\lambda_2\check x^{(n)}_s \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_s\phi'\bigl ( \check y^{(n)}_s\bigr)-\check y^{(n)}_t \phi'\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t\bigr ) \bigr ) \\ & & \hspace*{93.3pt}\qquad\quad { } + \frac{1}{2}\alpha_2\lambda_2 \check x^{(n)}_s \bigl ( \check y^{(n)}_s \phi''\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_s \bigr)-\check y^{(n)}_t\phi '' \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t\bigr ) \bigr ) \biggr]\,ds \biggr|\nonumber\\ & & \qquad = o(h_n).\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] recalling the definition of @xmath602 above lemma [ lemunifmombdx ] , the first expected value on the right - hand side in ( [ eqab ] ) equals @xmath650.\ ] ] thus @xmath651 \\ & & \qquad = e \biggl[\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) h_n \biggl(\frac{1}{h_n a_n } \int_{ta_n}^{ta_n+h_na_n } \mathcal{l } _ { x^\circ_s}\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t\bigr)\,ds-\check{\mathcal{l}}\phi\bigl ( \check y^{(n)}_t\bigr ) \biggr ) \biggr]\\ & & \qquad\quad{}+o(h_n ) \\ & & \qquad = e \biggl[\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) h_n \biggl(c_2 \lambda_2\check y^{(n)}_t\phi ' \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t\bigr)+\frac { 1}{2 } \alpha_2\lambda_2 \check y^{(n)}_t \phi''\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t \bigr ) \biggr ) \\ & & \hspace*{173.4pt}{}\times \biggl(\frac{1}{h_na_n}\int_{ta_n}^{ta_n+h_na_n } x^\circ_s \,ds - m_x \biggr ) \biggr]\\ & & \qquad\quad{}+o(h_n).\end{aligned}\ ] ] to complete the proof , it thus remains to show that for some sequence @xmath652 with @xmath597 @xmath653 converges to 0 uniformly in @xmath654 $ ] . from the ergodicity of @xmath127 and the moment estimate in lemma [ lemunifmombdx ] , it follows that @xmath655 the above result , along with lemma [ lemshiftintegrallimits ] , below , implies that there is a sequence @xmath652 such that @xmath656 , and the expression in ( [ eqc ] ) converges to 0 uniformly in @xmath657 $ ] . this completes the proof . the proof of the following lemma is adapted from lemma ii.9 , page 137 , in @xcite . [ lemshiftintegrallimits ] let @xmath658 and @xmath659 monotonically as @xmath57 . if for all @xmath654 $ ] @xmath660 then there is a sequence @xmath652 such that @xmath661 as @xmath662 , and @xmath663}e\biggl{\vert}\frac{1}{h_na_n}\int_{ta_n}^{ta_n+h_na_n}x_s\,ds - m_x \biggr{\vert}\to0\qquad \mbox{as } n\to \infty.\ ] ] let @xmath664 . note that @xmath665 converges monotonically to 0 as @xmath666 . for @xmath654 $ ] we have @xmath667 for all @xmath2 such that @xmath668 . note that the right - hand side of the last display is independent of @xmath654 $ ] . choosing @xmath669 , the lemma follows . as in the proof of theorem [ thmfastcatalystweaklimit ] , it suffices to show that for all @xmath192 , @xmath593 , @xmath594 and @xmath595 , there exists a sequence @xmath596 with @xmath597 and @xmath663}\bigl|e\bigl[\phi\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k}\bigr ) \bigl(\phi\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t+h_n}\bigr)-\phi\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t } \bigr)-h_n\check l\phi\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t \bigr)\bigr)\bigr]\bigr|=o(h_n),\ ] ] where @xmath599 is given as in ( [ eq8.2 ] ) . let for @xmath594 and @xmath670 @xmath671 \mu_2^{(n)}(k)\ ] ] and recall @xmath672 from ( [ eq8.6 ] ) . then @xmath673 \nonumber\\ & & \qquad = e \biggl[\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) \int_t^{t+h_n } \mathcal{l}^{(n)}_{\check x^{(n)}_s}\phi\bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t \bigr)\,ds \biggr ] \\ & & \qquad\quad { } + e \biggl[\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) \int_t^{t+h_n } \bigl [ \mathcal{l}^{(n ) } _ { \check x^{(n)}_s}\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_s \bigr)-\mathcal{l}^{(n ) } _ { \check x^{(n)}_s } \phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t \bigr ) \bigr]\,ds \biggr ] . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] using lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] , we get , as in ( [ eqsecondterm ] ) , that the second term in the last display is @xmath674 uniformly in @xmath654 $ ] . thus @xmath675 \nonumber\\ & & \qquad = e \biggl[\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) \biggl(\int_{t}^{t+h_n } \bigl(\mathcal{l}^{(n ) } _ { \check x^{(n)}_s}\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t \bigr)-\mathcal{l}_{\check x^{(n)}_s}\phi \bigl ( \check y^{(n)}_t \bigr ) \bigr ) \,ds \biggr ) \biggr ] \nonumber\\[-8pt]\\[-8pt ] & & \qquad\quad{}+ e \biggl[\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_{t_1},\ldots,\check y^{(n)}_{t_k } \bigr ) h_n \biggl(\frac{1}{h_n } \int_{t}^{t+h_n } \mathcal{l } _ { \check x^{(n)}_s}\phi \bigl(\check y^{(n)}_t\bigr)\,ds-\check{\mathcal{l}}\phi\bigl ( \check y^{(n)}_t\bigr ) \biggr ) \biggr]\nonumber\\ & & \qquad\quad{}+o(h_n ) . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] calculations similar to those in the proof of theorem [ thmcrdiffusion ] show that the first term on the right - hand side in the last display is @xmath674 uniformly in @xmath654 $ ] [ see proof of ( [ eqh4forsingletypecont ] ) ] , while the second term can be written as @xmath676.\end{aligned}\ ] ] to show that the latter term is @xmath674 uniformly in @xmath657 $ ] , it suffices to show the following result . [ th8.1 ] as @xmath57 @xmath663 } e\biggl{\vert}e_{\check{\mathcal{f}}^{(n)}_t } \biggl(\frac{1}{h_n } \int_{t}^{t+h_n}\check x^{(n)}_s \,ds - m_x \biggr)\biggr{\vert}\to0,\ ] ] where @xmath677 and @xmath678 . in order to prove this theorem , we need the following three results . let @xmath679 , @xmath26 be the space of probability measures on @xmath25 , and , given a sequence @xmath680 $ ] , @xmath681 be a sequence of @xmath26 valued random variables defined as follows . for @xmath682 , @xmath683\,ds.\ ] ] let @xmath684 . [ lemrandommeasuretight ] the family of @xmath26 valued random variables @xmath685 is tight , and any weak limit point is a @xmath686 valued random variable . let @xmath687 with @xmath460 and @xmath461 being the canonical coordinate processes on @xmath688 . [ lemrandommeasurelimit ] let @xmath199 be a weak limit point of @xmath689 given on some probability space @xmath690 . then for @xmath691 a.e . @xmath692 , @xmath693 satisfies the following : a. @xmath694 , for all @xmath42 ; @xmath695 ; b. @xmath461 is nondecreasing and @xmath696 a.s . @xmath693 ; c. @xmath697 a.s . d. under @xmath693 , for all @xmath491 @xmath698 is a @xmath699-martingale , where @xmath700 is as in ( [ eq7.2 ] ) and . we postpone the proofs of lemmas [ lemrandommeasuretight ] and [ lemrandommeasurelimit ] until after the proof of theorem [ th8.1 ] . the following is immediate from the above two lemmas , proposition [ propstationarydistrofx ] and the martingale characterization of the probability law of the process in ( [ eqx ] ) ; see theorem [ thmmartingalecharacterization ] . [ lemrandommeasurelimitcorollary ] let @xmath701 be as in proposition [ propuniqunessofx , y ] with @xmath702 and @xmath132 given as in proposition [ propstationarydistrofx ] . let @xmath703 be the probability measure on @xmath688 induced by @xmath701 . then @xmath681 converges weakly to @xmath703 . proof of theorem [ th8.1 ] it suffices to show that for an arbitrary sequence @xmath704 $ ] we have , as @xmath57 , @xmath705 since @xmath706 it suffices to show that @xmath707 for any @xmath708 , let @xmath709 be the following continuous function : @xmath710 and @xmath709 is linearly interpolated on @xmath711 $ ] . by corollary [ lemrandommeasurelimitcorollary ] @xmath681 converges weakly to @xmath703 , and therefore , for every @xmath708 , @xmath712 moreover , using the estimate in lemma [ lemsuptsupnexpmoment ] , @xmath713 and @xmath714 the last three displays imply the convergence in ( [ eq8.14 ] ) , and thus the result follows . proof of lemma [ lemrandommeasuretight ] to show the tightness of @xmath689 , it suffices to show that @xmath715 is tight , where for @xmath682 @xmath716\,ds.\ ] ] however , the tightness of @xmath717 is immediate in view of the tightness of @xmath718 which was proved in proposition [ lemtighnessofcatalyst - reactant ] . let @xmath199 be a weak limit point of @xmath681 and @xmath719 be defined by @xmath720\,du,\ ] ] where @xmath721 then @xmath722 is continuous and bounded on @xmath25 , and in order to show that @xmath199 is supported on @xmath688 , it suffices to show that @xmath723 ; see @xcite , page 147 . in turn , for the latter equality to hold , it suffices to show that for all @xmath381 , @xmath724 as @xmath57 . now @xmath725\wedge1 \bigr)\,du>\varepsilon \biggr ) \,ds.\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally , noting that @xmath726 is continuous and using lemma [ lempsupdeltahatx^nt ] , we now have that the right - hand side of the latter equation converges to 0 as @xmath57 . the result follows . proof of lemma [ lemrandommeasurelimit ] for a measure @xmath727 , let @xmath728 denote the expectation operator . for ( a ) , we show that @xmath729\\[-8pt ] & & \eqntext{\mbox{a.s . for all bounded continuous } f\mbox { on } s.}\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that @xmath730 this proves ( [ eq8.15 ] ) since we can choose @xmath596 such that @xmath731 , and thus ( a ) follows . property ( b ) is immediate from the fact that @xmath732 is nondecreasing and continuous with initial value 0 for each @xmath2 . to prove ( c ) , it suffices to show that for a.e . @xmath323 and for every @xmath733 @xmath734 where @xmath735 is defined in ( [ eqfdelta ] ) . in turn , for the above equality to hold , it suffices to show that @xmath736 the latter equality is immediate on noting that for every @xmath733 @xmath737 & & \qquad = \frac{1}{a_nh_n}\int_{a_nt_n}^{a_nt_n+a_nh_n}e \biggl(\int _ 0^t f_\delta\bigl(\hat x^{(n)}_{s+u}\bigr)\,d\bigl(\hat\eta^{(n)}_{s+\cdot}- \hat \eta^{(n)}_s\bigr ) ( u)\wedge1 \biggr ) \,ds=0\end{aligned}\ ] ] and thus @xmath738=\lim_{n\to\infty } e \biggl[\tilde e^{\mu_n } \biggl(\int_0^t f_\delta\bigl(\pi^{(1)}_s\bigr)\,d \pi^{(2)}_s\wedge1 \biggr ) \biggr]=0.\ ] ] finally , consider ( d ) . it suffices to show that for every @xmath739 , @xmath740 & & \hspace*{151.5pt}\qquad{}- \phi'(1)\bigl[\pi_t^{(2)}- \pi_r^{(2)}\bigr ] \biggr ) \biggr ) \biggr|=0,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath741 is an arbitrary bounded , continuous , @xmath742 measurable map . now fix such @xmath743 and @xmath107 . assume without loss of generality that @xmath681 converges to @xmath199 . combining this weak convergence with lemma [ lemevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedprocesses ] , we see that the left - hand side of the last display is the limit of @xmath744 & & \qquad\quad\hspace*{144.5pt}{}- \phi'(1)\bigl[\pi_t^{(2)}-\pi_r^{(2 ) } \bigr]\biggr ) \biggr ) \biggr| \\[-2pt ] & & \qquad=\frac{1}{a_nh_n}\int_{a_nt_n}^{a_nt_n+a_nh_n } e \biggl| e_{\check{\mathcal{f}}_{t_n } } \biggl(\psi\bigl(\hat x^{(n)}_{s+\cdot},\hat \eta^{(n)}_{s+\cdot}-\hat\eta^{(n)}_s\bigr ) \\[-2pt ] & & \hspace*{146.2pt}{}\times \biggl[\phi\bigl(\hat x^{(n)}_{s+t}\bigr)-\phi\bigl(\hat x^{(n)}_{s+r}\bigr ) \\[-2pt ] & & \qquad\quad\hspace*{130pt}{}-\int_r^t \mathcal{l}_1\phi\bigl(\hat x^{(n)}_{s+u } \bigr)\,du\\[-2pt ] & & \qquad\quad\hspace*{130pt}{}-\phi'(1)\bigl[\hat\eta^{(n)}_{s+t}-\hat \eta^{(n)}_{s+r}\bigr ] \biggr ] \biggr ) \biggr|\,ds.\end{aligned}\ ] ] to complete the proof , it suffices to show that the limit of the expression in the last display is 0 . note that for @xmath491 , @xmath745 is a martingale , where @xmath746 $ ] and @xmath747\mu_1^{(n)}(k).\ ] ] thus , it suffices to prove that @xmath748 and @xmath749 the proofs for the last two equalities are completed as those for ( [ eqh4forsingletypecont ] ) and ( [ eqeintd^n - phi ] ) upon using the uniform estimates in corollary [ corevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedhatx^n ] and lemma [ lemevofsquaredsupremaofshiftedprocesses ] . proof of proposition [ propuniqunessofx , y ] we will consider here only the case where @xmath750 for some @xmath751 . the general case can be treated similarly . the unique solvability of ( [ eqx ] ) is an immediate consequence of the lipschitz property of the skorohod map , lipschitz coefficients ( note that @xmath752 is a lipschitz function on @xmath4 ) and a standard picard iteration scheme ; see , for example , proposition 1 in @xcite . we next argue the unique solvability of ( [ eqy ] ) . for @xmath84 , let @xmath753 , @xmath754 and @xmath755 . consider the equation @xmath756\\[-8pt ] & & { } + \sqrt{\alpha_2 \lambda_2}\int_0^t \sqrt { \bar x^{(n)}_s f^{(n)}\bigl ( \bar y^{(n)}_s\bigr ) } \,db_s^y.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] from the lipschitz property of @xmath757 and @xmath758 it follows that , for each @xmath2 , the above equation has a unique pathwise solution . let @xmath759 and @xmath760 . note that @xmath761 solves ( [ eqy ] ) on @xmath762 $ ] . also , by unique solvability of ( [ eqcheckyinpropuniqunessofx , y ] ) , we have for all @xmath84 , @xmath763 finally , letting @xmath764 , the unique solution of ( [ eqy ] ) is given by the following : @xmath765 we thank the editor , the associate editor and the referees for their comments that led to several improvements in the manuscript . Abstract:
[ "near critical catalyst - reactant branching processes with controlled immigration are studied . the reactant population evolves according to a branching process whose branching rate is proportional to the total mass of the catalyst . the bulk catalyst evolution is that of a classical continuous time branching process ; in addition there is a specific form of immigration . immigration takes place exactly when the catalyst population falls below a certain threshold , in which case the population is instantaneously replenished to the threshold . such models are motivated by problems in chemical kinetics where one wants to keep the level of a catalyst above a certain threshold in order to maintain a desired level of reaction activity . a diffusion limit theorem for the scaled processes is presented , in which the catalyst limit is described through a reflected diffusion , while the reactant limit is a diffusion with coefficients that are functions of both the reactant and the catalyst . stochastic averaging principles under fast catalyst dynamics are established . in the case where the catalyst evolves `` much faster '' than the reactant , a scaling limit , in which the reactant is described through a one dimensional sde with coefficients depending on the invariant distribution of the reflected diffusion , is obtained . proofs rely on constrained martingale problem characterizations , lyapunov function constructions , moment estimates that are uniform in time and the scaling parameter and occupation measure techniques ." ]
11,828
11,828
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: for ultracold dilute non - relativistic bosons in three dimensions , bogoliubov theory gives a successful description of most quantities of interest @xcite . this approximation breaks down , however , near the critical temperature for the phase transition , as well as for the low temperature phase in lower dimensional systems , due to the importance of fluctuations . one would therefore like to have a systematic extension beyond the bogoliubov theory , which includes the fluctuation effects beyond the lowest order in a perturbative expansion in the scattering length . such extensions have encountered obstacles in the form of infrared divergences in various expansions @xcite . only recently , a satisfactory framework has been found to cure these problems @xcite . functional renormalization @xcite for the average action @xcite systematically copes with the infrared problems by exploring the difficult long range behavior gradually by means of non - perturbative flow equations , which are based on an exact renormalization group equation @xcite . for zero temperature they lead to a consistent description of bose - einstein condensation and the quantum phase transition for nonrelativistic bosons in arbitrary dimension @xcite . a key ingredient is the generation of a term in the inverse propagator that is quadratic in the frequency @xmath4 . it characterizes the long time behavior of the full propagator at long distances , even if no quadratic frequency dependence is present in the microphysical or classical propagator . the coupling @xmath5 is due to quantum fluctuations and appears during the flow from microphysics to macrophysics . the extreme infrared limit is governed by a `` relativistic '' model where @xmath5 dominates , with an enhanced ( approximate ) space - time symmetry @xmath6 corresponding to lorentz symmetry . in one or two dimensions the relativistic term @xmath7 in the inverse propagator is crucial for a correct description of the low temperature behavior . in contrast , in three dimensions the flow towards the extreme infrared behavior is only logarithmic , such that the quantitative influence remains quite moderate for practical purposes . nevertheless , the effective coupling @xmath5 is needed in order to avoid the infrared problems . in this paper , we extend this formalism to a nonvanishing temperature . we present a quantitative rather accurate picture of bose - einstein condensation in three dimensions and find that the bogoliubov approximation is indeed valid for most quantities . the same method can be applied for one or two dimensions , such that the present work can also serve as a test of the method . this is nontrivial , because insufficient truncations of the flow equations can lead to fake dependencies on the microscopic physics . for dilute non - relativistic bosons in three dimensions we find an upper bound on the scattering length @xmath0 . this is similar to the `` triviality bound '' for the higgs scalar in the standard model of elementary particle physics . as a consequence , the scattering length is at most of the order of the inverse effective ultraviolet cutoff @xmath8 , which indicates the breakdown of the pointlike approximation for the interaction at short distances . typically , @xmath8 is of the order of the range of the van der waals interaction . for dilute gases , where the interparticle distance @xmath9 is much larger than @xmath8 , we therefore always find a small concentration @xmath10 . this provides for a small dimensionless parameter , and perturbation theory in @xmath11 becomes rather accurate for most quantities . for typical experiments with ultracold bosonic alkali atoms one has @xmath12 , @xmath13 , such that @xmath14 is really quite small . bosons with pointlike interactions can also be employed for an effective description of many quantum phase transitions at zero temperature , or phase transitions at low temperature @xmath15 . in this case , they correspond to quasi - particles , and their dispersion relation may differ from the one of non - relativistic bosons , @xmath16 . we describe the quantum phase transitions for a general microscopic dispersion relation , where the inverse classical propagator in momentum and frequency space takes the form @xmath17 ( in units where the particle mass @xmath18 is set to @xmath19 ) . we present the quantum phase diagram at @xmath20 in dependence on the scattering length @xmath0 and a dimensionless parameter @xmath21 , which measures the relative strength of the term quadratic in @xmath22 in @xmath23 . in the limit @xmath24 ( @xmath25 ) our model describes relativistic bosons . a nonzero temperature @xmath15 introduces a new scale into the problem . this modifies the effective scaling behavior . in particular , near the critical temperature @xmath2 , where the bose - einstein condensate dissolves , the long distance physics can be described by classical statistics . the non - relativistic bosons belong to the universality class of the three - dimensional @xmath26 model , with the associated universal critical exponents . the flow equations in the classical regime are well studied and lead , for an appropriate level of the truncation , to very accurate results for the critical behavior @xcite . here we use a rather simple truncation , but we obtain nevertheless a reasonable description of the non - analytical critical behavior . however , the temperature range for the applicability of the universal critical behavior is found to be very small for the small values of @xmath11 encountered for the dilute gases . the value of the critical temperature for interacting bosons can not be computed within the bogoliubov theory . we find a temperature shift @xmath3 , compared to the free theory . in contrast to other estimates , which only take the classical fluctuations into account ( only the zero matsubara frequency ) , we include the full quantum statistics ( all matsubara frequencies ) . we finally compute the sound velocity at @xmath20 . this quantity agrees to high precision with the bogoliubov result . for a known scattering length @xmath0 , it can therefore be used as a precise measure of the density . our paper is organized as follows . as a starting point , we specify our microscopic model in sec . [ sectmicroscopicmodel ] . in the following sec . [ sectnonperturbativeflowequations ] , we recall the method of functional renormalization , explain our truncation of the effective average action and also describe the projection of the exact flow equation onto that truncation . the flow equations in the vacuum are investigated in sec . [ sectupperboundforthescatteringlength ] and an upper bound for the scattering length is derived . in sec . [ sectquantumphasediagram ] we explain our method to determine the density and also study the quantum phase diagram at zero temperature . the effects of a non - vanishing temperature on the condensate are taken into account in sec . [ secttemperaturedependenceofcondensate ] , while sec . [ sectcriticaltemperature ] gives our result for the critical temperature in dependence of the interaction strength . finally , we investigate the sound velocity and draw conclusions in secs . [ sectsoundvelocity ] and [ sectconclusions ] . the appendices [ secttruncation ] and [ sectsymmetriesandnoethercurrents ] contain a motivation of our truncation in terms of a systematic derivative expansion and an analysis of symmetries constraining the form of the effective action . our explicit results for the flow equations of the effective potential and the kinetic coefficients are shown in appendices [ secfloweffectivepotential ] and [ sectflowofkineticcoefficients ] . appendix [ sectpropdisp ] analyzes the dispersion relation . our microscopic action describes nonrelativistic bosons , with an effective interaction between two particles given by a contact potential . it is assumed to be valid on length scales where the microscopic details of the interaction are irrelevant and the scattering length is sufficient to characterize the interaction . the microscopic action reads @xmath27=\int_x \,{\big \{}\phi^*\,(s\partial_\tau - v\partial_\tau^2-\delta-\sigma)\,\phi\,+\,\frac{1}{2}\lambda(\phi^*\phi)^2{\big \ } } , \label{microscopicaction}\ ] ] with @xmath28 the integration goes over the whole space as well as over the imaginary time @xmath29 , which at finite temperature is integrated on a circle of circumference @xmath30 according to the matsubara formalism . we use natural units @xmath31 . we also scale time and energy units with appropriate powers of @xmath32 , with @xmath18 the particle mass . in other words , our time units are set such that effectively @xmath33 . in particular , we use the rescaled chemical potential @xmath34 and @xmath15 stands for the temperature multiplied by @xmath32 . in these units time has the dimension of length squared . for standard non - relativistic bosons one has @xmath35 and @xmath36 , but we also consider quasiparticles with a more general dispersion relation described by nonzero @xmath37 . after fourier transformation , the kinetic term reads @xmath38 with @xmath39 at nonzero temperature , the frequency @xmath40 is discrete , with @xmath41 while at zero temperature this becomes @xmath42 the dispersion relation encoded in eq . obtains by analytic continuation @xmath43 in this paper , we consider homogeneous situations , i.e. an infinitely large volume without a trapping potential . many of our results can be translated to the inhomogeneous case in the framework of the local density approximation . one assumes that the length scale relevant for the quantum and statistical fluctuations is much smaller than the characteristic length scale of the trap . in this case , our results can be transferred by taking the chemical potential position dependent in the form @xmath44 , where @xmath45 is the trapping potential . the microscopic action is invariant under the global @xmath46 symmetry which is associated to the conserved particle number , @xmath47 on the classical level , this symmetry is broken spontaneously when the chemical potential @xmath48 is positive . in this case , the minimum of @xmath49 is situated at @xmath50 . the ground state of the system is then characterized by a macroscopic field @xmath51 , with @xmath52 . it singles out a direction in the complex plane and thus breaks the @xmath46 symmetry . nevertheless , the action itself and all modifications due to quantum and statistical fluctuations respect the symmetry . for @xmath35 and @xmath36 , the situation is similar for galilean invariance . at zero temperature , we can perform an analytic continuation to real time and the microscopic action is then invariant under transformations that correspond to a change of the reference frame in the sense of a galilean boost . it is easy to see that in the phase with spontaneous @xmath46 symmetry breaking also the galilean symmetry is broken spontaneously : a condensate wave function , that is homogeneous in space and time , would be represented in momentum space by @xmath53 under a galilean boost transformation with a boost velocity @xmath54 , this would transform according to @xmath55 this shows that the ground state is not invariant under such a change of reference frame . this situation is in contrast to the case of a relativistic bose - einstein condensate , like the higgs boson field after electroweak symmetry breaking . a relativistic scalar transforms under lorentz boost transformations according to @xmath56 such that a condensate wave function @xmath57 transforms into itself . we will investigate the implications of galilean symmetry for the form of the effective action in app . [ secttruncation ] . an analysis of general coordinate invariance in nonrelativistic field theory can be found in @xcite . we start with a functional integral representation of the grand canonical partition function @xmath58}. \label{eqpartfunction}\ ] ] in this paper , we work with the formalism of quantum statistics for many particle problems . in contrast to classical statistics , the fields @xmath59 are parametrized by an euclidean time variable @xmath29 in addition to the space variable @xmath60 . this euclidean time is wrapped up on a circle of circumference @xmath61 , such that the fields @xmath59 live on a ( generalized ) torus . the microscopic action @xmath62 $ ] is of a form similar to . we generalize eq . by introducing a source @xmath63 for the fields @xmath64 and write @xmath65=e^{w[j]}=\int d \chi \,e^{-s[\chi]+\int_x j\chi}. \label{eqpartfunctwithj}\ ] ] the @xmath1-point correlation functions can now be obtained by functional differentiation of @xmath66 $ ] , while @xmath67 $ ] generates the connected @xmath1-point functions . for example , the expectation value of @xmath64 obtains from @xmath68}{\delta j(x)}.\ ] ] the thermodynamic potential @xmath69 associated with the grand canonical partition function is given by @xmath70.\ ] ] the effective action @xmath71 $ ] is defined as @xmath72=\left(-w[j]+\int_x j \phi\right)_{j = j_{\text{ex}}[\phi]}.\ ] ] where @xmath73 is obtained by the inversion of @xmath74}{\delta j}\bigg{|}_{j = j_\text{ex}}=\phi.\ ] ] it is straightforward to show @xmath75}{\delta \phi}=j$ ] . in the absence of a source @xmath63 , we obtain for the thermodynamic potential of the grand canonical partition function @xmath76\ ] ] where @xmath77 is defined by @xmath78}{\delta \phi}\bigg{|}_{\phi=\phi_{\text{eq}}}=0.\ ] ] the effective action @xmath71 $ ] is the generating functional of the one - point irreducible correlation functions and in a sense , its precise knowledge corresponds to the solution of the theory . our method determines @xmath71 $ ] with the help of an exact flow equation . for that purpose , we include an infrared cutoff term @xmath79 $ ] in eq . and define @xmath80}=\int d\chi\ , e^{-s[\chi]-\delta s_k[\chi]+\int j \chi}.\ ] ] in fourier space , the cutoff term reads @xmath81=\int_q r_k(q ) \chi^*(q)\chi(q)\ ] ] and has the properties @xmath82 the effective average action is defined as a modified legendre transform of @xmath83 @xmath84=\left ( -w_k[j]+\int_x j\phi \right)_{j = j_\text{ex}}-\delta s_k[\phi].\ ] ] it has the important property , that it interpolates between the microscopic action @xmath85 $ ] and the full effective action @xmath71 $ ] @xmath86 & \rightarrow s[\phi ] & \quad ( k\rightarrow \infty),\\ \gamma_{k}[\phi ] & \rightarrow \gamma[\phi ] & \quad ( k\rightarrow 0).\end{aligned}\ ] ] in physical terms @xmath87 $ ] is the effective action in the presence of an infrared cutoff at a momentum scale @xmath88 . only fluctuations with momenta larger than @xmath88 are included . for example , a finite volume @xmath89 of the system under consideration would lead to an situation that is described by @xmath87 $ ] . our method to determine @xmath87 $ ] ( and for @xmath90 also @xmath71 $ ] ) relies on the existence of an exact flow equation @xcite @xmath91 here the trace operation includes a momentum integration @xmath92 , as well as a sum over internal indices @xmath93 , according to the two real components in the decomposition @xmath94 . on the r.h.s . of , @xmath95 is the second functional derivative of @xmath87 $ ] @xmath96)_{ij}(q , p)=\frac{\overset{\rightharpoonup}{\delta}}{\delta\phi_i(-q)}\gamma_k[\phi]\frac{\overset{\leftharpoonup}{\delta}}{\delta \phi_j(p)}.\ ] ] it is therefore a matrix in internal and momentum space . correspondingly , @xmath97 in eq . stands for @xmath98 the flow equation describes the evolution of the effective average action with the cutoff scale @xmath88 . the functional differential equation is hard to be solved exactly . in principle , @xmath99 is described by infinitely many couplings . we will use here an approximation with only a finite number of couplings . this is achieved by an ansatz for a specific form of @xmath87 $ ] . in the absence of anomalies the effective action @xmath71 $ ] is invariant under the same symmetries as the microscopic action @xmath85 $ ] . this holds also for the effective average action @xmath87 $ ] , provided that the cutoff term @xmath100 $ ] is also invariant . our ansatz will respect all symmetries of the classical action . approximate solutions of the exact flow equations obtain from a truncation of the general form of the effective action . we use here terms with up to two derivatives and truncate @xmath101 with @xmath102 . this particular form is motivated by a more systematic derivative expansion and an analysis of symmetry constraints ( ward identities ) in appendix [ secttruncation ] . we introduce the renormalized fields @xmath103 , @xmath104 , the renormalized kinetic coefficients @xmath105 , @xmath106 and we express the effective potential in terms of the renormalized invariant @xmath107 , with @xmath108 this yields @xmath109 for the effective potential , we use an expansion around the @xmath88-dependent minimum @xmath110 of the effective potential and the @xmath88-independent value of the chemical potential @xmath111 that corresponds to the physical particle number density @xmath1 . we determine @xmath110 and @xmath111 by the requirements @xmath112 more explicitly we take a truncation for @xmath113 of the form @xmath114 in the symmetric phase we have @xmath115 , while in the phase with spontaneous symmetry breaking , we have @xmath116 . in summary , the flow of @xmath99 for fixed @xmath117 is described by four running renormalized couplings @xmath118 , @xmath119 , @xmath120 and @xmath37 . in addition , we need the anomalous dimension @xmath121 . a computation of @xmath1 requires a flow equation of @xmath122 , which involves the couplings linear in @xmath123 , namely @xmath124 and @xmath125 . the pressure is calculated by following the @xmath88-dependence of the height of the minimum @xmath126 . all couplings @xmath118 , @xmath119 , @xmath120 , @xmath37 , @xmath127 , @xmath122 , @xmath128 , @xmath124 , @xmath125 depend on @xmath88 and @xmath15 . the physical renormalized couplings obtain for @xmath90 . they specify the thermodynamic potential @xmath129 as well as suitable derivatives of the potential and the correlation function . the `` initial values '' at the scale @xmath130 are determined by the requirement @xmath131=s[\phi],\ ] ] using the microscopic action @xmath85 $ ] in eq . . this implies the initial values @xmath132 we remain with the free microscopic couplings @xmath133 , @xmath134 , @xmath135 . the coupling @xmath133 will be replaced by the scattering length @xmath0 in the next section . we further choose units for @xmath29 where @xmath136 then our second free coupling is @xmath137 in consequence , besides the thermodynamic variables @xmath15 and @xmath111 our model is characterized by two free parameters , @xmath0 and @xmath5 . often , we will concentrate on `` standard '' non - relativistic bosons with a linear @xmath29 derivative , such that @xmath138 . the scattering length @xmath0 remains then the only free parameter . in the vacuum , where @xmath139 , this sets the relevant unit of length . finally , we have for the infrared cutoff @xmath140 we choose the optimized cutoff function @xcite @xmath141 where we recall , that @xmath116 in the regime with spontaneous symmetry breaking . it is convenient to work with real fields @xmath142 , @xmath94 , with fourier components @xmath143 the inverse propagator for the fields @xmath144 becomes a @xmath145 matrix in the space of @xmath146 and @xmath147 , given by the second functional derivative of @xmath99 . for a real constant background field @xmath148 , @xmath149 the latter becomes diagonal in momentum space @xmath150 for our truncation one has at @xmath117 @xmath151 here , primes denote derivatives with respect to @xmath107 ( not @xmath152 ) . in the phase with spontaneous symmetry breaking , the infrared cutoff in the flow equation adds to the diagonal term in a piece @xmath153 . this effectively replaces @xmath154 in eq . whenever @xmath155 , thus providing for an efficient infrared regularization . we project the flow equation of the effective average action onto equations for the coupling constants by using appropriate background fields and taking functional derivatives . the flow equation for the effective potential obtains by using a space- and time - independent background field in eq . , with @xmath156 @xmath157 the propagator @xmath158 is here determined from @xmath159 with @xmath160 again primes denote a differentiation with respect to @xmath107 . we switch to renormalized fields by making a change of variables in the differential equation @xmath161 we can now derive the flow equations for the couplings @xmath110 and @xmath162 by appropriate differentiation of with respect to @xmath107 . the flow equation for @xmath163 is given more explicitly in appendix [ secfloweffectivepotential ] . differentiation with respect to @xmath48 yields the flow of @xmath122 , @xmath124 , @xmath125 . we use in detail @xmath164 where we recall , that @xmath165 in our truncation . to determine the flow equation of @xmath118 , we use the condition that @xmath166 for all @xmath88 , and therefore @xmath167 we show the flow of @xmath119 and @xmath118 in figs . [ figflowoflambda ] , [ figflowofrho ] for @xmath168 , @xmath20 and different values of @xmath133 ( with @xmath138 ) . the change in @xmath118 is rather modest . this will be different for nonzero temperature . with the scale parameter @xmath88 for different start values , corresponding to @xmath169 ( dotted ) , @xmath170 ( solid ) and @xmath171 ( dashed ) . the first case is plotted for zero density ( @xmath172 ) only , while the last two cases are plotted also for unit density ( @xmath168 ) . the curves @xmath172 and @xmath168 are identical within the plot resolution . the solid and the dashed curve correspond to @xmath173 and @xmath174 , respectively . ] . the parameters for the solid and the dashed curves are the same as in figure [ figflowoflambda ] . ] the flow of @xmath122 is given by @xmath175 and similar for the flow of @xmath124 and @xmath125 , @xmath176 where the last equation holds since @xmath177 in our truncation . for a derivation of @xmath178 and the flow equations for @xmath120 and @xmath37 , we have to evaluate the flow equation for a background field depending on @xmath179 and @xmath180 . we use an analytic continuation @xmath181 and obtain the flow equation for @xmath120 from @xmath182 with four - volume @xmath183 . the projection prescription for @xmath37 is @xmath184 and similar for @xmath127 @xmath185 after the functional differentiation , we evaluate the expressions , , at homogeneous background fields . these calculations are a little intricate , but standard and straightforward in principle . more explicit flow equations are given in app . [ sectflowofkineticcoefficients ] . eventually , it is always possible to perform the matsubara sums and also the spatial momentum integration analytically . in figure [ figflowkinetic ] we show the flow of @xmath127 , @xmath120 and @xmath37 at zero temperature and for density @xmath168 . ( solid ) , @xmath120 ( dashed ) and @xmath37 for a scattering length @xmath173 , temperature @xmath20 and density @xmath168 . ] the kinetic coefficient @xmath127 starts on the large scale with @xmath186 , increases a little around @xmath187 and saturates to a constant . in contrast , the coefficient @xmath120 starts to decrease after a short period of increase with @xmath127 . for very tiny scales @xmath88 , @xmath120 would finally go to zero . the frequency dependence of the propagator is then governed by the quadratic frequency coefficient @xmath37 . in three spatial dimensions , however , this decrease of @xmath120 is so slow that it is not relevant on the length scales of experiments . this is one of the reasons why bogoliubov theory , which neglects the appearance of @xmath37 , describes experiments with ultracold bosonic quantum gases in three dimensions with so much success . the coefficient @xmath37 is always generated in the phase with spontaneous symmetry breaking @xcite . its @xmath88-dependence is also shown in figure [ figflowkinetic ] . the vacuum is defined to have zero temperature @xmath20 and vanishing density @xmath172 , which also implies @xmath115 . the interaction strength @xmath119 at the scale @xmath188 determines the four point vertex at zero momentum . it is directly related to the scattering length @xmath0 for the scattering of two particles in vacuum , which is experimentally observable . we therefore want to replace the microscopic coupling @xmath133 by the renormalized coupling @xmath0 . in our units ( @xmath33 ) , one has the relation @xmath189 the vacuum properties can be computed by taking for @xmath20 the limit @xmath190 . we may also perform an equivalent and technically simple computation in the symmetric phase by choosing @xmath191 such , that @xmath192 . this guarantees that the boson field @xmath193 is a gap - less propagating degree of freedom . we first investigate the model with a linear @xmath29-derivative , @xmath194 , @xmath195 . projecting the flow equation , we find the following equations : @xmath196 the propagator is not renormalized , @xmath197 , @xmath198 , @xmath199 , and one finds @xmath200 . the coupling @xmath125 is running according to @xmath201 since @xmath125 appears only in its own flow equation , it is of no further relevance in the vacuum . also , no coupling @xmath37 is generated by the flow and we have therefore set @xmath35 on the r.h.s . of eqs . and . inserting in eq . the vacuum values @xmath116 and @xmath36 , we find @xmath202 the solution @xmath203 tends to a constant for @xmath204 , @xmath205 . the dimensionless variable @xmath206 goes to zero , when @xmath88 goes to zero . this shows the infrared freedom of the theory . for fixed ultraviolet cutoff , the scattering length @xmath207 as a function of the initial value @xmath133 , has an asymptotic maximum @xmath208 the relation between @xmath0 and @xmath133 is shown in fig . [ figscatteringbound ] . in dependence on the microscopic interaction strength @xmath133 ( solid ) . the asymptotic maximum @xmath209 is also shown ( dashed ) . ] as a consequence of eq . , the nonrelativistic bosons in @xmath210 are a `` trivial theory '' in the sense that the bosons become noninteracting in the limit @xmath211 , where @xmath212 . the upper bound has important practical consequences . it tells us , that whenever the `` macrophysical length scales '' are substantially larger than the microscopic length @xmath8 , we deal with a weakly interacting theory . as an example , consider a boson gas with a typical inter - particle distance substantially larger than @xmath8 . ( for atom gases @xmath8may be associated with the range of the van der waals force . ) we may set the units in terms of the particle density @xmath1 , @xmath168 . in these units @xmath213 is large , say @xmath214 . this implies a very weak interaction , @xmath215 . in other words , the scattering length can not be much larger than the microscopic length @xmath8 . for such systems , perturbation theory will be valid in many circumstances . we will find that the bogoliubov theory indeed gives a reliable account of many properties . even for an arbitrary large microphysical coupling @xmath216 , the renormalized physical scattering length @xmath0 remains finite . let us mention , however , that the weak interaction strength does not guarantee the validity of perturbation theory in all circumstances . for example , near the critical temperature of the phase transition between the superfluid and the normal state , the running of @xmath162 will be different from the vacuum . as a consequence , the coupling will vanish proportional to the inverse correlation length @xmath217 as @xmath15 approaches @xmath2 , @xmath218 . indeed , the phase transition will be characterized by the non - perturbative critical exponents of the wilson - fisher fixed point . also for lower dimensional systems , the upper bound for @xmath219 is no longer valid - for example the running of @xmath119 is logarithmic for @xmath220 . for our models with @xmath221 , the upper bound becomes dependent on @xmath222 . it increases for @xmath223 . in the limit @xmath224 , it is replaced by the well known `` triviality bound '' of the four dimensional relativistic model , which depends only logarithmically on @xmath213 . finally , for superfluid liquids , as @xmath225 , one has @xmath226 , such that for @xmath227 one finds a large concentration @xmath11 . the situation for dilute bosons seems to contrast with ultracold fermion gases in the unitary limit of a feshbach resonance , where @xmath0 diverges . one may also think about a feshbach resonance for bosonic atoms , where one would expect a large scattering length for a tuning close to resonance . in this case , however , the effective action does not remain local . it is best described by the exchange of molecules . the scale of nonlocality is then given by the gap for the molecules , @xmath228 . only for momenta @xmath229 the effective action becomes approximately local , such that @xmath230 for our approximation . close to resonance , the effective cutoff is low and again in the vicinity of @xmath231 . the density sets a crucial scale for our problem . its precise determination is mandatory for quantitative precision . we will discuss two different methods for its determination and show that the results agree within our precision . for @xmath20 , we also find agreement with the ward identity @xmath232 . the first method is to derive flow equations for the density . this has the advantage that the occupation numbers for a given momentum @xmath233 are mainly sensitive to running couplings with @xmath234 . in the grand canonical formalism , the density is defined by @xmath235{\big |}_{\phi=\phi_0,\sigma=\sigma_0}\ ] ] we can formally define a @xmath88-dependent density @xmath122 by @xmath236{\big |}_{\phi=\phi_0,\sigma=\sigma_0}=-(\partial_\sigma u)(\rho_0,\sigma_0).\ ] ] the flow equation for @xmath122 is given in eq . and the physical density obtains for @xmath188 . the term @xmath237 that enters eq . is the derivative of the flow equation for @xmath163 with respect to @xmath48 . to compute it , we need the @xmath48-dependence of the propagator @xmath158 in the vicinity of @xmath111 . within a systematic derivative expansion , we use the expansion of @xmath113 and the kinetic coefficients @xmath238 and @xmath239 to linear order in @xmath240 , as described in appendix [ secttruncation ] . here , @xmath241 and @xmath242 are the coefficient functions of the terms linear in the @xmath29-derivative and linear in @xmath243 , respectively . no reasonable qualitative behavior is found , if the linear dependence of @xmath238 and @xmath239 on @xmath240 is neglected . also , the scale dependence of @xmath124 and @xmath125 are quite important . the flow equations for @xmath124 and @xmath125 can be obtained directly by differentiating the flow equation of the effective potential with respect to @xmath48 and @xmath107 , cf . the situation is more complicated for the kinetic coefficients @xmath244 and @xmath245 . their flow equations have to be determined by taking the @xmath48-derivative of the flow equation for @xmath246 and @xmath242 . as discussed in app . [ secttruncation ] , we use in this paper the approximation @xmath247 . as a check of both our method and our numerics , we also use another way to determine the particle density . this second method is more robust with respect to shortcomings of the truncation , but less adequate for high precision calculations as needed e.g. to determine the condensate depletion . the second method determines the pressure @xmath248 as a function of the chemical potential @xmath111 . here , the effective potential is normalized by @xmath249 at @xmath20 , @xmath172 . the flow of the pressure can be read of directly from the flow equation of the effective potential and is independent of the couplings @xmath124 and @xmath125 . we calculate the pressure as a function of @xmath48 and determine the density @xmath250 by taking the @xmath48-derivative numerically . it turns out that @xmath251 is in very good approximation given by @xmath252 , where the constant @xmath11 can be determined from a numerical fit . the density is thus linear in @xmath48 . at zero temperature and for @xmath138 , we can additionally use the ward identities connected to galilean symmetry , which yield @xmath232 . we compare our methods in figure [ densitycompared ] and find that they give numerically the same result . we stress again the importance of a reliable method to determine the density , since we often rescale variables by powers of the density to obtain dimensionless variables . . we use three different methods : @xmath253 from the flow equation ( triangles ) , @xmath232 as implied by galilean symmetry ( stars ) and @xmath254 , where the pressure @xmath255 ( boxes ) was obtained from the flow equation and phenomenologically fitted by @xmath256 ( solid lines ) . units are arbitrary and we use @xmath257 , @xmath214 . ] we want to split the density into a condensate part @xmath258 and a density for uncondensed particles or `` depletion density '' @xmath259 . for our model the condensate density is given by the `` bare '' order parameter @xmath260 in order to show this , we introduce occupation numbers @xmath261 for the modes with momentum @xmath233 with normalization @xmath262 one formally introduces a @xmath233 dependent chemical potential @xmath263 in the grand canonical partition function @xmath264}=\text{tr}e^{-\beta(h-\omega_3\int_{\vec{p}}\sigma(\vec{p})n(\vec{p}))},\ ] ] with three dimensional volume @xmath265 . then one can define the occupation numbers by @xmath266{\big |}_{\phi=\phi_0,\sigma(\vec{p})=\sigma_0}.\ ] ] this construction allows us to use @xmath88-dependent occupation numbers by the definition @xmath267{\big |}_{\phi=\phi_0,\sigma(\vec{p})=\sigma_0}.\ ] ] one can derive a flow equation for this occupation number @xmath268 @xcite : @xmath269{\big |}_{\phi_0,\sigma_0}(\partial_k\rho_0 ) . \label{flowofnp}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we split the density occupation number into a @xmath270-distribution like part and a depletion part , which is regular in the limit @xmath271 @xmath272 one can see from the flow equation for @xmath268 that the only contribution to @xmath273 comes from the second term in equation . within a more detailed analysis @xcite one finds @xmath274 we therefore identify the condensate density with the bare order parameter @xmath275 correspondingly , we define the @xmath88-dependent quantities @xmath276 and compute @xmath277 by a solution of its flow equation . even at zero temperature , the repulsive interaction connected with a positive scattering length @xmath0 causes a portion of the particle density to be outside the condensate . from dimensional reasons , it is clear , that @xmath278 should be a function of @xmath279 . the prediction of bogoliubov theory or , equivalently , mean field theory , is @xmath280 . we may determine the condensate depletion from the solution to the flow equation for the particle density , @xmath281 , and @xmath282 . from galilean invariance for @xmath20 and @xmath138 , it follows that @xmath283 with @xmath284 . this gives an independent determination of @xmath258 . in figure [ figdepletion ] we plot the depletion density obtained from the flow of @xmath1 and @xmath285 over several orders of magnitude . apart from some numerical fluctuations for small @xmath279 , we find that our result is in full agreement with the bogoliubov prediction . as a function of the dimensionless scattering length @xmath286 . for the solid curve , we vary @xmath0 with fixed @xmath168 , for the dashed curve we vary the density at fixed @xmath174 . the dotted line is the bogoliubov - result @xmath287 for reference . we find perfect agreement of the three determinations . the fluctuations in the solid curve for small @xmath286 are due to numerical uncertainties . their size demonstrates our numerical precision . ] for @xmath20 a quantum phase transition separates the phases with @xmath115 and @xmath288 . in this section , we investigate the phase diagram at zero temperature in the cube spanned by the dimensionless parameters @xmath289 , @xmath290 and @xmath291 . this goes beyond the usual phase transition for nonrelativistic bosons , since we also include a microscopic second @xmath29-derivative @xmath292 , and therefore models with a generalized microscopic dispersion relation . for non - vanishing @xmath5 ( i.e. for a nonzero initial value of @xmath293 with @xmath294 in app . [ secttruncation ] ) , the galilean invariance at zero temperature is broken explicitly . for large @xmath5 , we expect a crossover to the `` relativistic '' @xmath26 model . if we send the initial value of the coefficient of the linear @xmath29-derivative @xmath295 to zero , we obtain the limiting case @xmath25 . the symmetries of the model are now the same as those of the relativistic @xmath26 model in four dimensions . the space - time - rotations or lorentz symmetry replace galilean symmetry . it is interesting to study the crossover between the two cases . since our cutoff explicitly breaks lorentz symmetry , we investigate in this paper only the regime @xmath296 . detailed investigations of the flow equations for @xmath25 can be found in the literature @xcite . the phase diagram in the @xmath297 plane with @xmath298 is shown in figure [ figqptsigmava1 ] . the critical chemical potential first increases linearly with @xmath5 and then saturates to a constant . the slope in the linear regime as well as the saturation value depend linearly on @xmath299 for @xmath300 . at @xmath20 , the critical exponents are everywhere the mean field ones ( @xmath198 , @xmath301 ) . this is expected : it is the case for @xmath138 @xcite , and for @xmath302 the theory is equivalent to a relativistic @xmath26 model in @xmath303 dimensions . this is just the upper critical dimension of the wilson - fisher fixed point @xcite . -@xmath5 plane for @xmath298 . ] from section 3 we know that for @xmath138 the parameter @xmath299 is limited to @xmath304 . for @xmath138 and a small scattering length @xmath212 , a second order quantum phase transition divides the phases without spontaneous symmetry breaking for @xmath305 from the phase with a finite order parameter @xmath288 for @xmath306 . it is an interesting question , whether this quantum phase transition at @xmath307 also occurs for larger scattering length @xmath0 . we find in our truncation that this is indeed the case for a large range of @xmath0 , but not for @xmath308 . here , the critical chemical potential suddenly increases to large positive values as shown in fig . [ figqptsigmaofa ] . for @xmath309 this increase happens even earlier . ( for a truncation with @xmath310 , the phase transition would always occur at @xmath311 . ) we plot the @xmath312 plane of the phase diagram for different values of @xmath5 in figure [ figqptsigmaofa ] . the form of the critical line can be understood by considering the limits @xmath313 as well as @xmath314 . -@xmath299 plane for @xmath315 ( dotted ) , @xmath316 ( dashed ) and @xmath138 ( solid ) . ] for a fixed chemical potential , the order parameter @xmath118 as a function of @xmath0 goes to zero at a critical value @xmath317 as shown in fig . [ figqptrhoofa ] . this happens in a continuous way and the phase transition is therefore of second order . for @xmath318 , we find @xmath319 . we emphasize , however , that @xmath317 is of the order of the microscopic distance @xmath8 . universality may not be realized for such values , and the true phase transition may depend on the microphysics . for example , beyond a critical value for the repulsive interaction , the system may form a solid . ultracold atom gases correspond to metastable states which may lose their relevance for @xmath320 . for @xmath309 and @xmath321 the phase transition occurs for @xmath322 such that universal behavior is expected . , with @xmath214 . the density @xmath323 as a function of the scattering length @xmath0 goes to zero at a critical @xmath324 , indicating a second order quantum phase transition at that point . ] so far , we have only discussed the vacuum and the dense system at zero temperature . a non vanishing temperature @xmath15 will introduce an additional scale in our problem . for small @xmath325 we expect only small corrections . however , as @xmath15 increases the superfluid order will be destroyed . near the phase transition for @xmath326 and for the disordered phase for @xmath327 , the characteristic behavior of the boson gas will be very different from the @xmath328 limit . for @xmath329 the particle density @xmath1 receives a contribution from a thermal gas of bosonic ( quasi- ) particles . it is no longer uniquely determined by the superfluid density @xmath118 . we may write @xmath330 and observe , that @xmath331 is enforced by galilean symmetry only for @xmath332 . the heat bath singles out a reference frame , such that for @xmath329 galilean symmetry no longer holds . in our formalism , the thermal contribution @xmath333 appears due to modifications of the flow equations for @xmath334 . we start for high @xmath88 with the same initial values as for @xmath20 . as long as @xmath335 the flow equations receive only minor modifications . for @xmath336 or smaller , however , the discreteness of the matsubara sum has important effects . we plot in fig . [ fignoftemperature ] the density as a function of @xmath15 for fixed @xmath337 . ( solid ) and order parameter @xmath338 ( dashed ) as a function of the temperature @xmath339 . the units are arbitray with @xmath340 and @xmath214 . the plot covers only the superfluid phase . for higher temperatures , the density is given by the thermal contribution @xmath341 only . ] in fig . [ fignofsigma ] we show @xmath342 , similar to fig . [ densitycompared ] , but now for different @xmath0 and @xmath15 . for @xmath20 the scattering length sets the only scale besides @xmath1 and @xmath48 , such that by dimensional arguments @xmath343 . bogoliubov theory predicts @xmath344 the first term on the r.h.s . gives the contribution of the ground state , while the second term is added by fluctuation effects . for small scattering length @xmath0 , the ground state contribution dominates . we have then @xmath345 for @xmath168 and @xmath346 can be treated as a small quantity . for @xmath347 and small @xmath0 one expects @xmath348 . the curves in fig . [ fignofsigma ] for @xmath349 show that the density , as a function of @xmath48 , is below the curve obtained at @xmath20 . this is reasonable , since the statistical fluctuations now drive the order parameter @xmath118 to zero . at very small @xmath48 , the flow enters the symmetric phase . the density is always positive , but for simplicity , we show the density as a function of @xmath48 in figure [ fignofsigma ] only in those cases , where the flow remains in the phase with spontaneous @xmath46 symmetry breaking . for different temperatures and scattering length . we plot @xmath342 in arbitrary units , with @xmath214 , and for a scattering length @xmath350 ( solid and dotted ) , @xmath174 ( dashed and dashed - dotted ) . the temperature is @xmath20 ( solid and dashed ) and @xmath349 ( dotted and dashed - dotted ) . ] for temperatures above the critical temperature , the order parameter @xmath118 vanishes at the macroscopic scale and so does the condensate density @xmath351 . the density is now given by a thermal distribution of particles with nonzero momenta . up to small corrections from the interaction @xmath352 , it is described by a free bose gas , @xmath353 with the `` bose function '' @xmath354 in figure [ figrhooftemperature ] we show the dimensionless order parameter @xmath355 as a function of the dimensionless temperature @xmath356 . as a function of the dimensionless temperature @xmath357 for scattering length @xmath174 . here , we varied @xmath15 keeping @xmath48 fixed . numerically , this is equivalent to varying @xmath48 with fixed @xmath15.[figrhooftemperature ] ] this plot shows the second order phase transition from the phase with spontaneous @xmath46 symmetry breaking at small temperatures to the symmetric phase at higher temperatures . the critical temperature @xmath2 is determined as the temperature , where the order parameter just vanishes - it is investigated in the next section . since we find @xmath358 , the condensate fraction @xmath359 as a function of @xmath356 resembles the order parameter @xmath355 . we plot @xmath127 as a function of @xmath356 in fig . [ abaroftemperature ] . except for a narrow region around @xmath2 , the deviations from one remain indeed small . near @xmath2 the gradient coefficient @xmath127 diverges according to the anomalous dimension , @xmath360 , with @xmath361 the anomalous dimension . the correlation length @xmath362 diverges with the critical exponent @xmath363 , @xmath364 , such that @xmath365 here , @xmath361 and @xmath363 are the critical exponents for the wilson fisher fixed point of the classical three - dimensional @xmath26 model , @xmath366 , @xmath367 @xcite . , as a function of the dimensionless temperature @xmath357 , and for scattering length @xmath174 . here , we varied @xmath15 keeping @xmath48 fixed . numerically , this is equivalent to varying @xmath48 with fixed @xmath15 . the plot covers only the phase with spontaneous symmetry breaking . for higher temperatures , the symmetric phase has @xmath368 . the divergence of @xmath127 for @xmath369 reflects the anomalous dimension @xmath361 of the wilson - fisher fixed point . ] in figure [ figrhoofsigma ] we plot @xmath355 as a function of the chemical potential @xmath48 for different temperatures and scattering lengths . we find , that @xmath370 is indeed approached in the limit @xmath328 , as required by galilean invariance . all figures of this section are for @xmath138 . the modifications for @xmath371 are mainly quantitative , not qualitative . , as a function of the chemical potential . we use arbitrary units with @xmath214 . the curves are given for a scattering length @xmath350 ( solid and dotted ) , @xmath174 ( dashed and dashed - dotted ) and temperature @xmath372 ( solid and dashed ) and @xmath349 ( dotted and dashed - dotted ) . at zero temperature , galilean invariance implies @xmath323 , which we find within our numerical resolution . ] the critical temperature @xmath2 for the phase transition between the superfluid phase at low temperature and the disordered or symmetric phase at high temperature depends on the scattering length @xmath0 . by dimensional reasoning , the temperature shift @xmath373 obeys @xmath374 . the proportionality coefficient can not be computed in perturbation theory @xcite . it depends on @xmath5 and we concentrate here on @xmath138 . monte - carlo simulations in the high temperature limit , where only the lowest matsubara frequency is included , yield @xmath375 @xcite . within the same setting , renormalization group studies @xcite yield a similar result , for composite bosons see @xcite . near @xmath2 , the long wavelength modes with momenta @xmath376 dominate the `` long distance quantities '' . then a description in terms of a classical three dimensional system becomes valid . this `` dimensional reduction '' is achieved by `` integrating out '' the nonzero matsubara frequencies . however , both @xmath377 and @xmath1 are dominated by modes with momenta @xmath378 such that corrections to the classical result may be expected . we have computed @xmath2 numerically by monitoring the zero of @xmath118 , as shown in fig . [ figrhooftemperature ] , @xmath379 . our result is plotted in fig . [ tcofa ] . in the limit @xmath212 we find for the dimensionless critical temperature @xmath380 , which is in good agreement with the expected result for the free theory @xmath381 . for the shift in @xmath2 due to the finite interaction strength , we obtain @xmath382 we expect that the result for @xmath383 depends on the truncation and may change somewhat if additional higher order couplings are included . as a function of the dimensionless scattering length @xmath279 ( points ) . we also plot the linear fit @xmath384 ( solid line ) . ] the macroscopic sound velocity @xmath385 is a crucial quantity for the hydrodynamics of the gas or liquid . it is accessible to experiment . as a thermodynamic observable , the adiabatic sound velocity is defined as @xmath386 where @xmath18 is the particle mass ( in our units @xmath387 ) , @xmath251 is the pressure , @xmath1 is the particle density , and @xmath388 is the entropy per particle . it is related to the isothermal sound velocity @xmath389 by @xmath390 where we use our units @xmath33 . one needs the `` equation of state '' @xmath391 and @xmath392 by dimensional analysis , one has @xmath393 with @xmath394 ( in bogoliubov theory ) , and @xmath395 ( free theory ) , such that for small @xmath11 @xmath396 at zero temperature the second term in eq . vanishes , such that @xmath397 . for the isothermal sound velocity one has @xmath398 we can now use @xmath399 and infer @xmath400 one may also define a microscopic sound velocity @xmath401 , which characterizes the propagation of ( quasi- ) particles . at zero temperature , where we can perform the analytic continuation to real time , we can calculate the microscopic sound velocity from the dispersion relation @xmath402 ( with @xmath403 ) . in turn , the dispersion relation is obtained from the effective action by setting @xmath404 , where @xmath405 is the full inverse propagator . we perform the calculation explicitly in app . [ sectpropdisp ] and find @xmath406 the bogoliubov result for the sound velocity is in our units @xmath407 in three dimensions , the decrease of @xmath120 is very slow and the coupling @xmath37 remains comparatively small even on macroscopic scales , cf . [ figflowkinetic ] . we thus do not expect measurable deviations from the bogoliubov result for the sound velocity at @xmath20 . in figure [ figsound ] , we plot our result over several orders of magnitude of the dimensionless scattering length and , indeed , find no deviations from bogoliubovs result . at zero temperature , as a function of the scattering length @xmath279 . within the plot resolution the curves obtained by varying @xmath0 with fixed @xmath1 , by varying @xmath1 with fixed @xmath0 , and the bogoliubov result , @xmath408 , coincide . ] we finally show that for @xmath20 the macroscopic and microscopic sound velocities are equal , @xmath409 . for this purpose , we use @xmath410 from the minimum condition @xmath411 , it follows @xmath412 combining this with the ward identities from app . [ secttruncation ] , namely @xmath413 and @xmath414 , valid at @xmath20 , it follows that the macroscopic sound velocity equals the microscopic sound velocity @xmath415 the use of functional renormalization yields a quantitative description of the whole phase diagram for dilute non - relativistic bosons in three dimensions . this can describe a gas of ultracold bosonic atoms . more generally , our results can also be applied to quantum phase transitions or low temperature phase transitions , whenever the most relevant excitations correspond to bosonic quasi - particles . for this reason we deal with a general dispersion relation , involving in the classical propagator terms linear and quadratic in the frequency . as a function of temperature @xmath15 and effective chemical potential @xmath48 , we have computed the pressure @xmath251 , the density @xmath1 , condensate @xmath285 , superfluid density @xmath118 , and the sound velocity @xmath401 , in dependence on two system parameters , namely the scattering length @xmath0 and a dimensionless coupling @xmath5 parameterizing the classical dispersion relation . for @xmath20 and @xmath138 we find very good agreement with the bogoliubov theory . as @xmath15 increases , the condensate melts at a critical temperature @xmath2 , which exceeds the one for the free theory by @xmath416 . we find a second order phase transition in the universality class of the three - dimensional @xmath26 model , with the associated universal critical exponents . we have found an upper bound for the scattering length , which is of the order of the microscopic length scale @xmath8 . this indicates the breakdown of the pointlike approximation . for atom gases , @xmath8 typically corresponds to the range of the van der waals interaction . the upper bound is a result of strong fluctuation effects in presence of a large microscopic interaction . even for an arbitrary strong microscopic interaction , the quantum fluctuations reduce the renormalized coupling , which corresponds to the physical scattering length in vacuum . for non - relativistic atoms with pointlike interactions , a strong interaction regime can therefore only be realized at high density , @xmath417 . superfluid liquids , like @xmath225 are good examples for such systems . first functional renormalization studies for such systems have already been performed @xcite . our extended treatment overcomes several problems of this early approach and we will apply it to @xmath225 in the future . except for the vicinity of the phase transition , however , the detailed microphysics may play an important role , since all relevant length scales are of the order of the microphysical length scale @xmath8 . other interesting extensions concern lower dimensional systems . we look forward to a unified functional renormalization description of bosons with pointlike interactions , for arbitrary dimensions and arbitrary interaction strength . we use a derivative expansion for the truncation of the effective average action with derivative operators up to four momentum dimensions @xmath418 here , we employ the renormalized fields @xmath419 and coupling functions @xmath163 , @xmath420 , @xmath421 . we fix the wave function renormalization factor @xmath127 such that @xmath422 . terms of the form @xmath423 or @xmath424 are not included here , since they are expected to play a sub - leading role . for a systematic derivative expansion they have to be added - the terms with up to two derivatives can be found in @xcite . in terms of dimensions , the operator @xmath425 counts as two space derivatives for the nonrelativistic model with @xmath35 , while it counts as one space dimension for the relativistic model with @xmath426 . we expand the @xmath88-dependent functions @xmath113 , @xmath241 , @xmath242 , @xmath427,@xmath428 and @xmath429 around the @xmath88-dependent minimum @xmath110 of the effective potential and the @xmath88-independent value of the chemical potential @xmath111 that corresponds to the physical particle number density @xmath1 . for example , with @xmath430 , one has @xmath431 let us concentrate on the non - relativistic model where @xmath36 , @xmath35 in the microscopic action . at zero temperature , we can perform an analytic continuation to real time @xmath432 . the microscopic action is then @xmath433&=&-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty } dt\int d^3x \\ & & { \big \{}\phi^*\,(-i\partial_t-\sigma-\delta)\,\phi\,+\,\frac{1}{2}\lambda(\phi^*\phi){\big \}}. \label{realtimemicroscopicaction}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in addition to space translations , rotations and time translations , two further symmetries constrain the possible forms of the couplings in @xmath434 . in order to derive these constraints , we extend eq . to a @xmath435-dependent source @xmath436 . first , there is a semi - local @xmath46 symmetry of the form @xmath437 this holds since the combination @xmath438 acts as a covariant derivative . in addition , we have the invariance under galilean boost transformations of the fields @xmath439 while the invariance of the interaction term under this symmetry is obvious , its realization for the kinetic term is more involved . performing the transformation explicitly , one finds @xmath440 such that indeed the combination @xmath441 leads to this invariance . on the other hand , the validity of the galilean symmetry for an effective action guarantees that only the combination or powers of this operator act on @xmath193 . an operator of the form @xmath442 with @xmath443 would break the symmetry . ( note , that @xmath444 is also invariant . ) both the semi - local @xmath46 symmetry and the galilean symmetry are helpful only at zero temperature . at nonzero temperature , the analytic continuation to real time is no longer useful . an analog version of the semi - local @xmath46 transformation for euclidean time @xmath29 would involve the imaginary part of the chemical potential @xmath48 , which has no physical meaning . the dependence of physical quantities on @xmath445 is not restricted . in addition , the galilean symmetry is broken explicitly by the thermal heat bath . combining semi - local @xmath46 symmetry and galilean symmetry at @xmath20 , we find that the derivative operators @xmath446 , @xmath243 and the chemical potential term @xmath240 are combined to powers of the operator @xmath447 in addition to powers of that operator acting on @xmath193 , only spatial derivatives of terms , that are invariant under @xmath46 transformations , like @xmath448 , may appear . since the symmetry transformations act linearly on the fields , the full effective action @xmath71 $ ] is also invariant . this also holds for the average action @xmath87 $ ] , provided that the cutoff term @xmath100 $ ] is invariant . we can write the effective action as an expansion in the operator @xmath449 @xmath450&=&\int_x \bigg{\{}u_0(\rho)\\ \nonumber & & + \frac{1}{2}\tilde{z}(\rho)\left(\phi^*(-i\partial_t-(\sigma-\sigma_0)-\delta)\phi+c.c\right)\\ \nonumber & & + \frac{1}{2}\tilde{v}(\rho)\left(\phi^*(-i\partial_t-(\sigma-\sigma_0)-\delta)^2\phi+c.c\right)\\ & & + \dots\bigg{\ } } \label{eqeffectiveactiongalilean}\end{aligned}\ ] ] performing the wick rotation back to euclidean time , we can compare this to eq . , and find for @xmath20 the relations @xmath451 and therefore @xmath452 we next compute the inverse propagator in a constant background field by expanding @xmath99 to second order in the fluctuations around this background . for this purpose , it is convenient to decompose @xmath453 the constant condensate field @xmath51 can be chosen to be real without loss of generality . the fluctuating real fields are the radial mode @xmath454 and the goldstone mode @xmath455 , and @xmath456 . the truncation of the effective average action reads in that basis @xmath457 = \int_x{\bigg \{}u(\rho,\sigma ) % \\ % \nonumber % & & & + & \frac{1}{2}z_1(\rho,\sigma ) \left(i\sqrt{2}\phi_0\partial_\tau\phi_2+i\phi_1\partial_\tau \phi_2-i\phi_2\partial_\tau\phi_1\right)\\ \nonumber & + & \frac{1}{2}z_2(\rho,\sigma ) \left(\sqrt{2}\phi_0(-\delta)\phi_1+\phi_1(-\delta ) \phi_1+\phi_2(-\delta)\phi_2\right)\\ \nonumber & + & \frac{1}{2}v_1(\rho,\sigma ) \left(\sqrt{2}\phi_0(-\partial_\tau^2)\phi_1+\phi_1(-\partial_\tau^2 ) \phi_1+\phi_2(-\partial_\tau^2)\phi_2\right)\\ \nonumber & + & v_2(\rho,\sigma ) \left(i\sqrt{2}\phi_0(\partial_\tau\delta)\phi_2+i\phi_1(\partial_\tau\delta ) \phi_2-i\phi_2(\partial_\tau\delta)\phi_1\right)\\ & + & \frac{1}{2}v_3(\rho,\sigma ) \left(\sqrt{2}\phi_0(-\delta^2)\phi_1+\phi_1(-\delta^2 ) \phi_1+\phi_2(-\delta^2)\phi_2\right){\bigg \}}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the inverse propagator @xmath95 can be inferred from an expansion in second order in @xmath454 and @xmath455 . we keep the linear order in @xmath123 , which will be needed for the flow equation for the density . this yields @xmath457 & = & \int_x{\bigg \{}u(\rho_0,\sigma_0)+u^{(\sigma)}\,(\sigma-\sigma_0)+\frac{1}{2}(u^\prime+2\rho_0 u^{\prime\prime})\phi_1 ^ 2+\frac{1}{2}u^\prime \phi_2 ^ 2\\ \nonumber & + & \frac{1}{2}\left(z_1+z_1^\prime \rho_0+z_1^{(\sigma)}(\sigma-\sigma_0)\right ) \left(i\phi_1\partial_\tau \phi_2-i\phi_2\partial_\tau\phi_1\right)\\ \nonumber & + & \frac{1}{2}\left(1 + 2 z_2^\prime \rho_0+z_2^{(\sigma)}(\sigma-\sigma_0)\right ) \left(\phi_1(-\delta ) \phi_1\right)\\ \nonumber & + & \frac{1}{2}\left(1+z_2^{(\sigma)}(\sigma-\sigma_0)\right ) \left(\phi_2(-\delta ) \phi_2\right)\\ \nonumber & + & \frac{1}{2}\left(v_1 + 2 v_1^\prime\rho_0+v_1^{(\sigma)}(\sigma-\sigma_0)\right ) \left(\phi_1(-\partial_\tau^2 ) \phi_1\right)\\ \nonumber & + & \frac{1}{2}\left(v_1+v_1^{(\sigma)}(\sigma-\sigma_0)\right ) \left(\phi_2(-\partial_\tau^2 ) \phi_2\right)\\ \nonumber & + & \left(v_2+v_2^\prime\rho_0+v_2^{(\sigma)}(\sigma-\sigma_0)\right ) \left(i\phi_1(\partial_\tau\delta ) \phi_2-i\phi_2(\partial_\tau\delta)\phi_1\right)\\ \nonumber & + & \frac{1}{2}\left(v_3 + 2v_3^\prime \rho_0+v_3^{(\sigma)}(\sigma-\sigma_0)\right ) \left(\phi_1(-\delta^2 ) \phi_1\right)\\ & + & \frac{1}{2}\left(v_3+v_3^{(\sigma)}(\sigma-\sigma_0)\right)\left(\phi_2(-\delta^2 ) \phi_2\right){\bigg \}},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we dropped the argument @xmath458 at several places and used the implicit rescaling condition @xmath459 . in our simple truncation , we take at @xmath117 only @xmath460 into account . we neglect the contribution of the other couplings , i.e. set @xmath461 . as shown above , it follows from the symmetry requirements at zero temperature , that @xmath462 , @xmath463 and @xmath464 . the truncation @xmath294 therefore violates the galilean symmetry , as does our choice of the cutoff term @xmath465 . within our approximation , it is consistent to set @xmath466 at zero temperature . also the deviations from this relation at finite temperature are neglected for simplicity in this paper . this yields eq . . in the following we discuss the role of continuous symmetries of the microscopic action @xmath85 $ ] . since all these symmetries are linear in the fields , the full effective action @xmath71 $ ] is also symmetric . in the case that the cutoff term @xmath100 $ ] is chosen invariant under the symmetry transformation in question , this also holds for the average action @xmath467 $ ] for finite @xmath88 . from noether s theorem it follows that there exists a conserved current @xmath468 connected with every such symmetry . if the action is formulated as an integral over the imaginary time @xmath29 the conservation equation implies for the current @xmath469 at zero temperature , we can perform a wick rotation to real time , @xmath470 , and eq . takes the usual form @xmath471 the noether charge @xmath472 is conserved in time , i.e. @xmath473 . this holds if @xmath474 falls off sufficiently fast at spatial infinity . at finite temperature however , the situation is different . a simple analytic continuation to real time is no longer possible , since the configuration space is now a torus with periodicity @xmath475 in the @xmath29-direction instead , we can integrate eq . over complex time @xmath29 , giving @xmath476 from the symmetry , it now follows that there exists a solenoidal vector field or three component current @xmath477 . a global symmetry of an action @xmath71 $ ] ( where @xmath434 could be replaced by @xmath120 or @xmath99 if appropriate ) can be formulated in its infinitesimal form as @xmath478=\gamma[\phi],\ ] ] with @xmath479 independent of @xmath480 . here @xmath388 is the infinitesimal generator of the symmetry transformation . for a local transformation , where @xmath479 depends on @xmath480 , @xmath481 , we can expand @xmath482=\gamma[\phi]+\int_x \left\ { ( \partial_\mu\epsilon){\cal j}^\mu+(\partial_\mu\partial_\nu\epsilon){\cal k}^{\mu\nu}+\dots\right\}. \label{noetherexpansion}\ ] ] the global symmetry implies that the expansion on the r.h.s . of eq . starts with @xmath483 . here and in the following it is implied that @xmath479 as well as its derivatives are infinitesimal , i.e. we keep only terms that are linear in @xmath479 . the index @xmath484 goes over @xmath485 , representing @xmath486 in the real time case and @xmath487 for imaginary time . . implies for arbitrary @xmath488 @xmath489}{\delta\phi}\epsilon s\phi-(\partial_\mu\epsilon){\cal j}^\mu-(\partial_\mu\partial_\nu\epsilon){\cal k}^{\mu\nu}+\dots\right\}=0 . \label{eqnoetherintegral}\ ] ] our notation is for real fields and implies a summation over components , if appropriate . in a complex basis one replaces @xmath490 by @xmath491 . is valid for all field configurations @xmath193 and not only for those that fulfill the field equation @xmath492}{\delta \phi}=0 $ ] . in consequence , the integrand is a total derivative @xmath493}{\delta\phi}\epsilon s\phi-(\partial_\mu\epsilon){\cal j}^\mu-(\partial_\mu\partial_\nu\epsilon){\cal k}^{\mu\nu}+\ldots & \\ & = -\partial_\mu\left(j^\mu \epsilon+\kappa^{\mu\nu}\partial_\nu\epsilon+\ldots\right ) . & \end{aligned}\ ] ] we can now specialize to @xmath494 and find @xmath495}{\delta\phi } s\phi(x)=-\partial_\mu j^\mu.\ ] ] this defines the noether current @xmath496 . for solutions of the field equation , @xmath492}{\delta\phi}=0 $ ] , the current @xmath496 is conserved , @xmath497 . for a given @xmath480 we can also specialize to @xmath498 which leads to @xmath499 this process can be continued , leading us to a whole tower of identities for the conserved current @xmath496 . if the action @xmath71 $ ] includes derivatives only up to a finite order @xmath1 , i.e. can be written in the form @xmath72=\int_x{\cal l}(\phi,\partial\phi , \partial\partial\phi , \ldots , \partial^{(n)}\phi),\ ] ] the expansion on the right hand side of only contains terms up to order @xmath500 such that the tower of equations for @xmath496 can be solved . moreover , for homogeneous situations where @xmath492}{\delta\phi}$ ] is solved by a constant @xmath193 , the second term on the r.h.s . vanishes since it includes a derivative . we have then @xmath501 . a convenient way to find the local currents employs parameters @xmath502 that decay sufficiently fast at infinity such that we can partially integrate eq . @xmath503}{\delta\phi } s\phi+\partial_\mu{\cal j}^\mu-\partial_\mu\partial_\nu{\cal k}^{\mu\nu}+\dots\right\}=0.\ ] ] this yields the local identity @xmath78}{\delta \phi}s\phi=-\partial_\mu{\cal j}^\mu+\partial_\mu\partial_\nu { \cal k}^{\mu\nu}-\dots.\ ] ] an expansion of the l.h.s . in derivatives often yields substantial information on @xmath504 etc . by inspection . our construction yields a unique conserved local current @xmath496 for every generator of a continuous symmetry . we note , however , that @xmath505 is also a conserved local current if @xmath124 and @xmath506 are independent of @xmath480 . this remark is important if we want to associate @xmath496 with the current for a physical quantity . a rotation invariant setting implies @xmath507 , but @xmath508 and @xmath124 may differ from zero . after these general considerations we now specialize to nonrelativistic real time actions of the form @xmath72=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dt \int d^3x{\cal l}(\phi , ( i\partial_t+\delta)\phi,(i\partial_t+\delta)^2\phi,\dots).\ ] ] we assume , that @xmath434 invariant under the same symmetries as the action . from the symmetry under time translations @xmath509 we find a conserved current @xmath510 . up to a possible additive constant its @xmath435-component is the energy density , while the spatial components describe energy flux density . the multiplicative constant @xmath124 gets fixed if we choose the units to measure energy . the choice @xmath511 corresponds to @xmath512 . similarly , the invariance under spatial translations @xmath513 implies a conserved current @xmath514 for each spatial direction @xmath515 . up to an additive constant @xmath516 the @xmath435-component is the conserved momentum density , @xmath517 , while the spatial components can be interpreted as a momentum flux density , with the diagonal components @xmath518 describing pressure . from the global @xmath46 symmetry @xmath519 we can infer the conservation of the current @xmath520 associated to the conserved particle number . in order to identify the total particle number with the charge of this current , @xmath521 , we need to fix a possible multiplicative constant @xmath124 . for this purpose , we use the galilean boost invariance , described already in eq . . it reads in its infinitesimal form @xmath522 and the conserved charge of @xmath523 is the center of mass , again up to an additive constant . the generator @xmath523 can be decomposed as @xmath524 this implies for the current @xmath525 specializing to the @xmath435-component , identifying the momentum density @xmath526 and reintroducing the particle mass @xmath33 we find @xmath527 from this we can conclude that up to an additive constant @xmath528 is the particle density @xmath529 . for the effective action we find for @xmath117 and constant @xmath530 the current @xmath531 using the normalization condition @xmath532 , this gives @xmath533 . at zero temperature , this is the particle density and the additive constant @xmath534 vanishes . at nonzero temperature we can compare to eq . and find @xmath535 . for completeness we also mention the symmetry under spatial rotations @xmath536 with orthogonal matrix @xmath537 , generators @xmath538 , and @xmath539 the antisymmetric tensor in three dimensions . the infinitesimal transformation reads @xmath540 the time component of the conserved current @xmath541 is , of course , the angular momentum density . we derive the flow equation for the effective potential by evaluating the flow equation for the average action for constant fields . inserting a real constant field @xmath542 one finds for @xmath543 the flow at fixed @xmath107 @xmath544 here , @xmath545 is the number of spatial dimensions and we use the abbreviations @xmath546 we dropped the arguments @xmath547 at several places on the right hand side . primes denote derivatives with respect to @xmath107 . in the phase with spontaneous symmetry breaking , we have @xmath548 . the matsubara sums over @xmath1 can be carried out by virtue of the formulae @xmath549 with @xmath550 . this brings us to @xmath551 where we introduced @xmath552 in our simple truncation with @xmath553 , @xmath554 , @xmath461 , and at @xmath117 , the integrand in eq . becomes mostly independent of the spatial momentum . the integral can than be carried out and we find @xmath555 with @xmath556 that the momentum integral can be performed analytically is a nice feature of the cutoff . the limit @xmath328 is obtained by substituting the @xmath557 functions with unity . the flow of the effective potential contains a subtlety that can be seen in the limit @xmath558 ( @xmath515 ) , where we find @xmath559 the term @xmath560 in the last line is not present if @xmath293 is set to zero from the outset . if @xmath238 is independent of @xmath107 , this term is independent of @xmath107 and gives only an overall shift of the effective potential . we show in this appendix our results for the flow equation of the kinetic coefficients @xmath120 , @xmath127 and @xmath37 . we neglect all contributions from momentum dependent vertices . in other words , we use @xmath107-independent constants @xmath561 , @xmath562 and @xmath554 . in our truncation with @xmath563 , and with the cutoff , we can perform all momentum integrations analytically , leading us to @xmath564 here , @xmath545 is the number of spatial dimensions , @xmath565 and @xmath566 are as in . the matsubara sums over @xmath1 can be performed analytically again by using and derivatives thereof . in the limit @xmath328 , the matsubara frequencies are continuous @xmath567 and the sum becomes an integral @xmath568 . the expressions for @xmath361 and @xmath569 in eq . agree with those derived in @xcite , while our result for @xmath570 corrects an error in a first version of @xcite ( in equation ( c.8 ) ) . the inverse propagator is given by the second functional derivative of the effective action @xmath571 and we find from the truncation @xmath572 here we use the abbreviations @xmath573 at zero temperature , we can analytically continue to real time @xmath574 , and find @xmath575 the dispersion relation is found from the on shell condition @xmath576 which yields @xmath577 the solutions for @xmath22 define the dispersion relation . we find two branches , according to @xmath578 in the phase with spontaneous symmetry breaking , the @xmath579 branch of this solution is an `` optical mode '' , while the @xmath580 branch is a sound mode . the microscopic sound velocity is @xmath581 . using @xmath582 , @xmath583 , @xmath584 and @xmath585 , we find @xmath586 the `` optical mode '' has at vanishing spatial momentum the frequency @xmath587 which diverges @xmath588 in the limit @xmath589 . 12 n. n. bogoliubov , j. phys . ( moscow ) * 11 * , 23 ( 1947 ) . s. t. beliaev , sov . jetp * 7 * , 289 ( 1958 ) ; * 7 * , 299 ( 1958 ) ; j. gavoret , p. nozires , ann . ( n. y. ) * 28 * , 349 ( 1964 ) ; a. a. nepomnyashchii , y. a. nepomnyashchii , jetp lett . * 21 * , 1 ( 1975 ) . c. castellani , c. di castro , f. pistolesi , g. c. strinati , phys . lett . * 78 * , 1612 ( 1997 ) ; f. pistolesi , c. castellani , c. d. castro , g. c. strinati , phys . b * 69 * , 024513 ( 2004 ) . c. wetterich , phys . b * 77 * , 064504 ( 2008 ) . k. g. wilson , phys . b * 4 * , 3174 ( 1971 ) ; k. g. wilson , j. b. kogut , phys . * 12 * , 75 ( 1974 ) ; f. wegner , a. houghton , phys . rev . a * 8 * , 401 ( 1973 ) ; j. polchinski , nucl . b * 231 * , 269 ( 1984 ) . c. wetterich , z. phys . c * 48 * , 693 ( 1990 ) ; nucl . b * 352 * , 529 ( 1991 ) . c. wetterich , phys . b * 301 * , 90 ( 1993 ) . j. berges , n. tetradis and c. wetterich , phys . rept . * 363 * , 223 ( 2002 ) ; c. bagnuls , c. bervillier , phys . rept . * 348 * , 91 ( 2001 ) ; b. delamotte , arxiv : cond - mat/0702365 . n. dupuis , k. sengupta , europhys . lett . * 80 * , 50007 ( 2007 ) . j. o. andersen and m. strickland , phys . rev . a * 60 * , 1442 ( 1999 ) ; l. canet , b. delamotte , d. mouhanna and j. vidal , phys . b * 68 * , 064421 ( 2003 ) ; phys . d * 67 * , 065004 ( 2003 ) ; c. bervillier , a. juttner and d. f. litim , nucl . phys . b * 783 * , 213 ( 2007 ) . d. t. son and m. wingate , annals phys . * 321 * , 197 ( 2006 ) . d. f. litim , phys . b * 486 * , 92 ( 2000 ) ; j. m. pawlowski , annals phys . * 322 * , 2831 ( 2007 ) . c. wetterich , arxiv:0712.1926 [ cond-mat.stat-mech ] . t. papenbrock and c. wetterich , z. phys . c * 65 * , 519 ( 1995 ) . d. i. uzunov , phys . a * 87 * , 11 ( 1981 ) ; s. sachdev , quantum phase transitions , cambridge university press , cambridge ( 1999 ) . k. g. wilson and m. e. fisher , phys . rev . * 28 * ( 1972 ) 240 . a. pelissetto and e. vicari , phys . rept . * 368 * , 549 ( 2002 ) . j. o. andersen , rev . phys . * 76 * , 599 ( 2004 ) . p. arnold , g. moore , phys . * 87 * , 120401 ( 2001 ) ; v. a. kashurnikov , n. v. prokofev , b. v. svistunov , phys . lett . * 87 * , 120402 ( 2001 ) . g. baym , j. -p . blaizot , m. holzmann , f. lalo , d. vautherin , phys . lett . * 83 * , 1703 ( 1999 ) ; j. -p . blaizot , r. mndez - galain , n. wschebor , phys . e * 74 * , 051116 ( 2006 ) ; j. -p . blaizot , r. mndez - galain , n. wschebor , phys . e * 74 * , 051117 ( 2006 ) . s. ledowski , n. hasselmann , p. kopietz , phys . a * 69 * , 061601(r ) ( 2004 ) ; n. hasselmann , s. ledowski , p. kopietz , phys . a * 70 * , 063621 ( 2004 ) . s. diehl , h. gies , j. m. pawlowski and c. wetterich , phys . a * 76 * , 021602(r ) ( 2007 ) . t. gollisch and c. wetterich , phys . b * 65 * , 134506 ( 2002 ) . Abstract:
[ "we investigate bose - einstein condensation for interacting bosons at zero and nonzero temperature . functional renormalization provides us with a consistent method to compute the effect of fluctuations beyond the bogoliubov approximation . for three - dimensional dilute gases , we find an upper bound on the scattering length @xmath0 which is of the order of the microphysical scale - typically the range of the van der waals interaction . in contrast to fermions near the unitary bound , no strong interactions occur for bosons with approximately pointlike interactions , thus explaining the high quantitative reliability of perturbation theory for most quantities . for zero temperature we compute the quantum phase diagram for bosonic quasiparticles with a general dispersion relation , corresponding to an inverse microphysical propagator with terms linear and quadratic in the frequency . we compute the temperature dependence of the condensate and particle density @xmath1 , and find for the critical temperature @xmath2 a deviation from the free theory , @xmath3 . for the sound velocity at zero temperature we find very good agreement with the bogoliubov result , such that it may be used to determine the particle density accurately ." ]
12,517
12,517
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: rare event physics at the low energy frontier is playing a significant role in particle physics and cosmology . examples of such rare phenomena could be the detection of non - baryonic particle dark matter ( axions or wimps ) , supposedly filling a substantial part of the galactic haloes , or neutrinoless double beta decay . these rare signals , if detected , would be important evidences of a new physics beyond the standard model of particle physics , and would have far - reaching consequences in cosmology . the experimental achievements accomplished during the last decade in the field of ultra - low background detectors have led to sensitivities capable of searching for such rare events . dark matter detection experiments have largely benefited from the techniques developed for double beta decay searches . both types of investigation , which have very close relation from an experimental point of view , are the two main scientific objectives of cuoricino and cuore . due to the low probability of both types of events , the essential requirement of these experiments is to achieve an extremely low radioactive background . for that purpose the use of radiopure detector components and shieldings , the instrumentation of mechanisms of background identification , the operation in an ultra - low background environment , in summary , the use of the state - of - the - art of low background techniques is mandatory . in some of these phenomena , like the case of the interaction of a particle dark matter with ordinary matter , a very small amount of energy is deposited , and the sensitivity needed to detect events within such a range of energies , relies on how low the energy threshold of detection is . in addition , to increase the chances of observing such rare events a large amount of detector mass is in general advisable , and so most of the experiments devoted to this type of searches are planned to have large detector mass , while keeping the other experimental parameters ( background , energy thresholds and resolutions ) optimized . on the other hand , the recent development of cryogenic particle detection @xcite has led to the extended use of thermal detectors @xcite to take advantage of the low energy threshold and good energy resolution that are theoretically expected for the thermal signals . this detection technology has also the advantage of enlarging the choice of materials which can be used , either as dm targets or @xmath2 decay emitters . after a long period of r&d to master the techniques used in cryogenic particle detectors , low temperature devices of various types are now applied to the detection of double beta decay or particle dark matter @xcite . a major exponent of this development is the midbd ( _ milano double beta _ ) experiment @xcite , which successfully operated a 20 teo@xmath3 crystal array of thermal detectors of a total mass of 6.8 kg , the largest cryogenic mass operated up to now . with the objective of going to larger detector masses and of improving the sensitivity achieved in the smaller arrays , the cuore ( _ cryogenic underground observatory for rare events _ ) project @xcite was born some years ago as a substantial extension of midbd . the objective of cuore is to construct an array of 1000 bolometric detectors with cubic crystal absorbers of tellurite of 5 cm side and of about 760 g of mass each . the crystals will be arranged in a cubic compact structure and the experiment will be installed in the gran sasso underground laboratory . the material to be employed first is teo@xmath3 , because one of the main goals of cuore is to investigate the double beta decay of @xmath1te , although other absorbers could also be used to selectively study several types of rare event phenomenology . apart from the midbd experiment , already completed , a wide r&d program is under way in the framework of cuoricino , a smaller and intermediate stage of cuore , which consists of 44 of the above crystals ( 790 g in this case ) and 18 smaller crystals ( 330 g ) for a total mass of @xmath440 kg . cuoricino has been recently installed in the gran sasso laboratory ( lngs ) and is , by far , the largest cryogenic detector on the stage . the preliminary running tests are encouraging @xcite . in the present work the prospects are presented for the cuore and cuoricino experiments with respect to their double beta decay discovery potential and their detection capability of wimp and axions . in section [ bc ] considerations of the expected background levels in the energy regions of interest are made taking into account all relevant sources . the theoretical motivation of neutrinoless double beta decay experiments as well as the experimental prospects of both cuoricino and cuore are shown in section [ dbd ] . in the same way , the physics potential of the experiments is discussed for direct detection of wimps in section [ wimps ] and for solar axion searches in section [ axions ] . from the radioactive background point of view , thermal detectors are very different than , say , conventional ionization detectors ; the former are sensitive over the whole volume , implying that surface impurities may play an important role . in principle , bolometric detectors like those used in midbd , cuoricino and cuore experiments are expected to have radioactive backgrounds larger than those of conventional germanium ionization detectors , also because the more complex technology of cryodetectors had not yet been fully optimized from the point of view of the radiopurity of the components near the detector . on the other hand , the production of radiopure absorbers for thermal detectors is less mastered than the production of radiopure ge crystal . however , after a considerable r&d effort a significant improvement in the radiopurity of bolometers has been accomplished during recent years , and now these devices have achieved very competitive backgrounds @xcite . the midbd background @xcite at low energy ( @xmath52 c / kev / kg / d at threshold -10 kev- and at 3500 m.w.e . ) is similar to the measured event rate anticoincident with the veto in the cdms experiment @xcite ( @xmath5 2 c / kev / kg / d at 10 kev and at 20 m.w.e . ) and in the edelweiss experiment @xcite(@xmath5 1.8 c / kev / kg / d at 30 kev and 4000 m.w.e . ) , without a veto , ( in both cases , obviously , prior to charge - heat discrimination ) and is roughly equal to that of dama @xcite and anais @xcite ( @xmath5 1.5 c / kev / kg / d , at 2 kev and 3500 m.w.e . and at 4 kev and 2450 m.w.e . respectively ) but still one order of magnitude worse than that of igex @xcite ( @xmath5 0.2 and 0.05 c / kev / kg / d at 4 kev and 10 kev respectively , and at 2450 m.w.e . ) . in the double beta decay region ( @xmath5 2.5 mev ) the midbd background values ( @xmath5 0.3 and 0.6 c / kev / kg / y in the old and new set - up respectively ) are competitive but still higher than those of the igex and heidelberg - moscow experiments @xcite ( @xmath5 0.05 c / kev / kg / y at 2 mev ) ( which uses pulse shape discrimination ) . the challenge of cuore is to significantly reduce the midbd background values ( both in the low and high energy regions ) by , say , two orders of magnitude without using background discrimination mechanisms like the simultaneous measurement of charge ( or light ) and heat . this reduction will be accomplished by working on both the selection of low contamination materials and on the improvement of the detector geometry and the shielding efficiency . as one of the main ingredients in the prospective physics potential of the cuoricino and cuore experiments is the level of background achievable , an evaluation of the expected background must be done , including the contribution of all the possible background sources . a preliminary estimation is contained in ref . @xcite , a more complete estimate is underway . in the following we will give a briefing of that reference and will add further considerations . there are several background sources to be considered : the environmental backgrounds of the underground site ( neutrons from the rocks , environmental @xmath6 flux ... ) , the intrinsic radioactivities of the detectors components and shielding ( bulk and surface ) , the cosmic muon induced backgrounds ( neutrons , muon direct interactions ) , as well as the possible cosmogenic induced activities produced when the detector and components were outside the underground laboratory . even the small leakage of two neutrino double beta decay counts emitted by the absorber s nuclei in the relevant region of analysis might be a potential source of background . the depth at which the experiment will be performed , plus the addition of an efficient cosmic veto and a suitable passive shielding ( lead , polyethylene , ) will effectively reduce the external background . so we will refer mainly to the intrinsic background , although we will make some remarks concerning the other sources . on the other hand , the experience gained in the midbd experiment , where the measured background is used as a test - bench for checking the mc estimates , has been essential in predicting the expectations for cuoricino and cuore . using the midbd results and the cuoricino tests a monte carlo study of the expected intrinsic background has been carried out for the cuoricino and cuore set - ups . radioactive impurities in the bulk of the tellurite crystals , as well as in the dilution refrigerator and surrounding shielding were assumed . background suppression due to the anticoincidence between crystals ( which will be significant in the cuore set up ) was calculated . the code is based on the geant-4 @xcite package ; it models in detail the shields , the cryostat , the detector structure and the detector array for the midbd , cuoricino and cuore experiments . it includes the propagation of photons , electrons , @xmath7 particles and heavy ions ( nuclear recoils from @xmath7 emission ) as well as neutrons and muons . for the simulated radioactive chains ( @xmath8 and @xmath9 ) or radioactive isotopes ( @xmath10 , @xmath11 ) alpha , beta and @xmath6 /x ray emmissions are considered according to their branching ratios . the time structure of the decay chains is taken into account and the transport of nuclear recoils from alpha emissions is included . the 20 crystal midbd array was operated in two different configurations @xcite , the difference between the two was that in the latter configuration the roman lead shield surrounding the detectors was improved by increasing its thickness , and that the crystals as well as their copper mounting structures underwent a new surface treatment . the crystals were re - polished with superpure powders while the copper was cleaned with a chemical process . the result was an improvement in the background measured in the second configuration ( midbd - ii ) with respect to that measured in the previous one ( midbd - i ) either in the gamma region ( below 3 mev ) and in the @xmath7 region ( between 3 and 10 mev ) . the @xmath7 peaks identified in midbd - i as due to a surface u and th contamination of the crystals were reduced by a factor 2 . the reduction of the @xmath7 contaminations , together with the reduction of the @xmath12tl line at 2615 kev is probably responsible of the improvement obtained in the 2448 - 2556 kev ( 0@xmath132@xmath14 decay ) region where the counting rate changed from [email protected] c / kev / kg / y in midbd - i to [email protected] c / kev / kg / y in midbd - ii @xcite . during midbd - ii run , a 10 cm thick borated polyethylene shield was mounted outside the external lead shield but no improvement in the counting rate was obtained proving that the backgroud was still dominated by other radioactive sources . with the above background value the lower limit of the neutrinoless half - life of @xmath16 obtained is @xmath17 y , or equivalently , an upper bound for the majorana neutrino mass @xmath18 of 0.9 - 5.2 ev ( depending on the nuclear matrix element calculation ) , which is the second - best published result @xcite . as far as the low energy region is concerned , the background of midbd stands around 2.3 c / kev / kg / day between 10 and 50 kev and 0.5 c / kev / kg / day between 50 and 80 kev , region where the dark matter signal is expected @xcite . with these background values , the exclusion plot of wimps interacting coherently with te and o is depicted as the ( dashed ) contour of figure [ cuoricino_exclusion ] . to understand what are the main sources responsible of the midbd background the mc code developed to study cuore background was used to reproduce the results obtained in the two configurations in which the midbd 20 crystal array was operated @xcite . the radioactive impurities used as inputs were all the contaminants identified in the midbd background spectrum , through an analysis of the @xmath7 and @xmath6 lines : @xmath19u chain in secular equilibrium , @xmath19u chain broken at the level of @xmath20ra , @xmath21bi or @xmath22pb , @xmath23th chain in secular equilibrium , @xmath24k and @xmath25co . either bulk contaminations ( with a uniform and isotropic distribution ) and surface contaminations ( with an exponential density profile and various depths ) were considered . the details of this analysis are reported in ref . @xcite , the results obtained can be summarized as follows : the mc simulation is able to reproduce the measured background spectrum , allowing the identification and localization of the most probable sources of background . it proves that a large contribution to the counting rate in both the low energy region and the 0@xmath132@xmath14 region comes from the surface contaminations of the crystals and of the copper structure facing the bare crystals . in the case of the crystals , the origin of this contamination is known : it is due to the use of contaminated powders during the optical polishing of the crystals produced by the shanghai quinhua material company ( sqm ) in china . indeed the re - treatment of their surfaces by means of low contamination powders reduced the contamination to one half . for this reason it was agreed that the cuoricino crystals would undergo only a minor surface treatment in china ( the one indispensable to check crystal quality ) and were subsequently polished in italy using low contamination powders . on the contrary , the origin of the copper surface contamination is still uncertain : it could either have been produced during the machining of the metal or during the surface acid treatment . as the cuoricino copper structure was produced with the same technique of the midbd - ii a similar contamination may have been produced . for cuore a dedicated r@xmath26d is foreseen to reduce or cancel this kind of contamination . finally , other important contributions come from bulk contamination of the structures outside the roman lead shield that surrounds the detector and from outside the cryostat . evaluating each impurity for each simulated element , the maximum contribution to the measured background by bulk contamination of teo@xmath3 , copper and roman lead were obtained and have been used in cuore simulation . cuoricino will be operated in the same set - up as that of the midbd experiment : the same dilution refrigerator , the same cryostat , the same external lead and borated - polyethylene shield , at the same underground location ( a description of the set - up can be found in ref . the crystals will be different but the measured upper limits of their u and th contamination are again of the order of 10@xmath27 g / g . therefore bulk contribution to cuoricino background should be not larger than that measured in midbd - ii . on the other hand , for surface contamination some improvement with respect to midbd - ii result is foreseen thanks to the different surface treatment of the crystals and to a reduced exposure of detectors to dust and rn . a reasonable guess for cuoricino is therefore a background of @xmath5 0.1 c / kev / kg / y in the @xmath28 region , slightly better than the one measured in midbd - ii ; while in the dark matter region a background of the order of 1 - 0.1 c / kev / kg / d is anticipated . on the contrary no extrapolation of the background achievable in cuore is possible from the midbd data , nor from the cuoricino results . this is true for several reasons : the different structure of the detector ( in the case of cuore an efficient reduction of background events will be provided by operating the detectors of the array in anticoincidence , without loosing efficiency in detecting wimps or 0@xmath132@xmath14 decay events ) , the different cryostat and shielding systems , and finally because a much more severe selection of the constructing materials and a much better control on their mechanical working and chemical cleaning will be applied . also predictions based on mc simulations are not straightforward since they depend critically on the assumed inputs : contamination levels , detector design , etc . here we present a very conservative evaluation of the background reachable with cuore , mainly based on the state of the art of detector design and on the knowledge of radioactive contamination . the cuore construction will require about five years and in the meantime an @xmath29 dedicated to background reduction will be realised . this approach for intrinsic background evaluation could be rather pessimistic but it is the only one that presently guarantees a reliable but possibly conservative prediction . in cuore ( a description of the set - up can be found in ref . @xcite ) the main contribution to background due to bulk contaminations comes from the heavy structures near the detectors ( the copper mounting structure of the array , the roman - lead box and the two lead disks on the top of the array ) and from the detectors themselves ( the @xmath30 crystals ) . in the simulation , the @xmath9 , @xmath8 , @xmath10 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 , @xmath33 and @xmath34 impurities of @xmath30 , copper and lead as well as the @xmath11 cosmogenic contamination of copper are conservatively assumed equal to the 90% c.l . upper limits obtained for the contamination levels of those materials measured in midbd experiment or in low hp@xmath35 spectrometry @xcite . the @xmath11 cosmogenic contamination of @xmath30 is on the other hand evaluated according to the time required to produce @xmath30 powder from the ore , grow the crystals and store them underground @xcite . with these contaminations , assuming a threshold of 10 kev and using the results obtained after the reduction by anti - coincidence between detectors , the background due to bulk contaminations is @xmath36 counts/(kev kg y ) in the @xmath37 decay region and @xmath38 counts/(kev kg d ) in the low energy region ( 10 - 50 kev ) . on the other hand , surface contaminations contribute to background only when they are localized on the crystals or on the copper mounting structure directely facing them . in the simulation , u and th surface contaminations are assumed to be : for crystals @xmath5 100 times lower and for copper @xmath5 50 times lower than the corresponding contamination in midbd experiment . the midbd crystals were contaminated during the polishing procedure due to the use of highly contaminated powders . polishing powders with a radioactive content 1000 times lower are however commercially available and have already been used for cuoricino , an improvement of the surface contamination of a factor 100 is therefore fully justified . a similar situation holds for copper . in the midbd experiment the copper surfaces were treated with an etching procedure studied to reduce impurities on surfaces before the sputtering process . this procedure resulted in an improvement of the surface quality of copper , however it is not optimized from the point of view of background . the use -for the surface treatment- of low contamination liquids in a low background environment , and special care in the mechanical working and handling will allow an improvement between one and two orders of magnitude in the surface contamination of copper . with such a contamination the surface contribution is estimated to be 2.8@xmath39 counts/(kev kg y ) in the 0@xmath132@xmath14 region and @xmath40 counts/(kev kg d ) in the dark matter region . finally , the unavoidable background produced by the @xmath41 decay region is lower than 10@xmath42 counts/(kev kg y ) in the 0@xmath132@xmath14 region and @xmath43 counts/(kev kg d ) in the dark matter region ( assuming 3.8@xmath44 y for the @xmath1te @xmath45 half - life @xcite ) . concerning the cosmogenic activation produced by cosmic rays when the crystals are above ground ( during fabrication and shipping of the crystals from the factory to the underground laboratory ) we used a code based on computed cross sections to estimate the amount and type of radionuclides produced by cosmic rays on teo@xmath3 @xcite . the comparison between our prediction and the midbd - i and ii run data is discussed in ref . the radionuclei produced by the activation of tellurium are mostly tellurium isotopes ( a=121,123,125,127 ) as well as @xmath46sb , @xmath47sb , @xmath25co and tritium , these last three being of more concern because of their long half - life ( @xmath47sb : beta decay of 2.7 years , end - point energy of 767 kev , @xmath25co : beta decay of 5.27 years end - point energy 2823 kev and @xmath48h : beta decay of 12.3 years , end - point energy of 18 kev ) . in midbd - i no clear evidence of cosmogenic activation was present ( the crystals were stored underground for several months ) , while in midbd - ii the @xmath6 lines of the tellurium isotopes were clearly seen , with an intensity that is in good agreement with our prediction ( based on the period they were reexposed because of the repolishing process ) . the history of the cuoricino crystals is rather similar to those of midbd , therefore their cosmogenic activation is already included in the extrapolation of cuoricino background from midbd data . in the case of cuore the control on crystal production will be more severe . the sqm that produces the crystals , oxidizing the tellurium ore and growing a 760 g crystal in about two months , will require two years to grow the 1000 cuore detectors . once grown , the crystals will be shipped to italy and stored underground , therefore their total exposition to cosmic rays will be limited to about 4 months . the total induced activities remaining after 2 years underground have been estimated @xcite and the consequent contribution to the detector counting rate was deduced by a mc simulation . the radionuclei that contribute to background through their @xmath49 decay are : * in the 0@xmath132@xmath14 region , the long lived @xmath25co isotope with an activity of @xmath50.2 @xmath50bq / kg , while a minor contribution is due to the isotopes @xmath51ag and @xmath46sb whose activity is 4 times lower and fast decreasing with time ; * in the dark matter region , the long lived nuclei of @xmath48h and @xmath47sb with an activity of @xmath57 @xmath50bq / kg for the former and of @xmath515 @xmath50bq / kg for the latter . the influence of @xmath25co in the cuore background was already considereded in the evaluation of the contributions due to bulk contaminations of the crystals , while the contribution of @xmath48h and @xmath47sb to the dark matter region is completely negligible ( @xmath52 counts/(kev kg d ) ) if compared to the intrinsic background . as noted before , neither contributions from underground cosmic muons nor neutrons have been taken into account in detail in the estimation of the background . however , the following simplified arguments will serve to have an approximate idea of their contribution . the depth of the lngs ( 3500 m.w.e ) reduces the muon flux to @xmath52@xmath53 @xmath54s@xmath55 , but a further effective reduction could be obtained with the use of an efficient ( 99.9% ) active veto to detect muons traversing the detectors and to tag possible events associated with them . consequently , the muon - induced events contributing to the background are expected to be only a small component of it . on the other hand , the shielding will substantially reduce the event rate due to particles external to the detector from various sources ( neutrons and photons ) , from radioactivity in the environment ( natural decay chains u / th , @xmath22pb , @xmath24k , ) , as well as muon - induced in the surroundings or in the shielding itself . the passive shielding either for midbd , for cuoricino and for cuore consists of a neutron screen ( blocks of -borated- polyethylene of 10 cm thickness ) to moderate and attenuate neutrons and a lead shell to attenuate the incoming external photons ; the innermost part ( 10 cm thick ) is made of special lead with a small content ( @xmath5616 bq / kg ) of @xmath22pb ( half - life 22 years ) while the outer part ( 10 cm thick ) is made of modern lead ( @xmath22pb @xmath56150bq / kg ) both with a low level of th and u. neutrons may constitute a worrisome background in dark matter experiments because for appropriate neutron energies ( few mev ) they can produce nuclear recoils in the detector target nuclei which would mimic wimp interactions . simple kinematics tells that in the case of tellurium , neutrons of 1 to 5 mev could elastically scatter off tellurium nuclei producing recoils of energies up to 31 to 154 kev . in general , one considers neutrons of two origins : from radioactivity in the surroundings or muon - induced . depending on the overburden of the underground site ( i.e. , depending on the muon flux ) , muon - induced neutrons are produced , at lesser or greater rate , both inside and outside the shielding . they are moderated according to their energies by the polyethylene and lead shield ( when produced outside ) or tagged by the muon veto coincidence ( when produced within the passive shielding ) . a certain fraction of the neutrons of a few mevs produced outside can pass the veto reaching the detector and producing `` dangerous '' nuclear recoils and @xmath6 background . however , a significant fraction of the associated events can be vetoed because of their interaction with the veto and also because of the hadronic showers initiated by the muons ( see ref . @xcite ) . in the case of external neutrons ( from the rocks , from fission processes or from ( n,@xmath7 ) reactions , as well as neutrons originated by muons in the walls of the underground site ) , the environmental neutron flux has been measured in lngs . the resulting flux is of @xmath57 @xmath54s@xmath55 for the thermal component , @xmath58 @xmath54s@xmath55 for the epithermal and @xmath59 @xmath54s@xmath55 for energies over 2.5 mev @xcite . they are fairly well moderated by the polyethylene and eventually absorbed or captured . we have carried out a monte carlo simulation of the propagation of neutrons through the 10 cm thick borated polyethylene shield of cuoricino and cuore . the result is that the neutron induced event rate on the entire energy range ( from threhsold to 10 mev ) is much lower than the contribution due the bulk contamination of crystals . other neutrons , produced by muon interactions inside the shielding materials , are very scarce and tagged as events coincident with the muon veto . as it is well - known , muon - induced neutrons are originated in a variety of processes . the reduction of muon flux in underground sites results in a substantial depletion of the associated neutrons and below @xmath5100 m.w.e . the dominant sources of neutrons are nuclear fission processes and ( n,@xmath7 ) reactions in rocks and other environmental material with sizeable content of u / th . the energy spectrum of muon - induced neutrons is approximated by an inverse energy power law ( @xmath60 for 1 - 50 kev and @xmath61 above 50 kev ) but other neutron energy spectra have been proposed . the neutron yield per muon can be approximately evaluated for an organic compound through the simple expression @xmath62 neutrons/(g @xmath54 ) per muon @xcite which fits the value of 1.5@xmath63 neutrons/(g @xmath54 ) of the muon - induced neutron flux measured by the lvd experiment at gran sasso @xcite . for the lngs muon flux ( 2.5@xmath53 @xmath50/(@xmath64s ) ) , muons would produce in the cuore shielding of polyethylene ( 10 cm ) and lead ( 20 cm ) ) about @xmath50.04 neutrons/(m@xmath65 day ) in the polyethylene shield and @xmath525 neutrons/(m@xmath65 day ) in the lead shell . so , independently of the mechanism set up to reject or tag the events associated to neutrons , their rather small number is expected to play a secondary role in the total background compared with other , intrinsic , sources of background . a preliminary evaluation of the influence of the environmental @xmath6 background in gran sasso @xcite resulted in a negligible contribution for the @xmath28 region and a contribution similar to that of bulk contaminations for the dark matter region . a more complete and detailed study of the external , non intrinsic background rates for cuore is underway . summarizing , for cuoricino a background similar to the one measured in midbd - ii is the most conservative prediction either in the dark matter region or in the @xmath28 region . for cuore on the other hand , the previous sections have shed light on how the background contamination dominating the two regions of interest is mostly the intrinsic background due to bulk and surface contaminations of the contructing materials . with the presently achieved quality of low contamination materials and considering the worst possible condition for bulk contaminations ( i.e. all the contamination equal to the present 90%/,c.l . measured upper limits ) we have proved that cuore background will be @xmath66 counts/(kev kg y ) at the @xmath28 transition energy and @xmath67 counts/(kev kg d ) near threshold . even at these conservative values cuore is , as we will prove in the following , a powerful instrument to search for double beta decay and dark matter . however , the goal of the cuore technical @xmath68 of the next few years will be the reduction of background to the level of 0.001 counts/(kev kg y ) at the @xmath28 transition energy and to 0.01 counts/(kev kg d ) at threshold . the potential of the experiment in this background configuration will also be discussed . regarding the expected threshold and resolution , in the cuoricino test experiment @xcite energy thresholds of @xmath69 kev have been obtained and a resolution of 1 kev at the 46 kev line of @xmath22pb was achieved in some of the detectors . details can be found in ref . we will assume a conservative value of 10 kev for the energy threshold of both cuoricino and cuore , and energy resolutions of 1 kev at threshold . as far as the energy resolutions obtained in the double beta decay region , values of 3 kev at 2615 kev were achieved in some crystals but they are worse ( by a factor two ) in others . an energy resolution of 5 kev will be assumed both for cuore and for cuoricino . taking into account these expectations , we discuss in the following the prospects of cuoricino and cuore for double beta decay searches ( section 3 ) , for wimp detection ( section 4 ) and for solar axion exploration ( section 5 ) . one of the main scientific objectives of the cuore detector is the search for the neutrinoless double - beta decay of the @xmath1te isotope contained in the ( natural ) teo@xmath3 crystals . the importance of nuclear double - beta decay as an invaluable tool to explore particle physics beyond the standard model has been repeatedly emphasized and widely reported @xcite . in the standard model of particle physics neutrinos are strictly massless , although there is no theoretical reason for such a prejudice . on the experimental side , moreover , there exist strong evidences from atmospheric neutrino data ( from superkamiokande @xcite ) , from experiments with solar neutrinos ( from homestake , gran sasso and kamioka @xcite ) and from reactor experiments ( from kamland @xcite ) which suggest that neutrinos have indeed masses and oscillate among the three species . the results of the solar @xmath13 experiment from sno with both cc ( charged current ) and nc ( neutral current ) interactions @xcite , also combined with superk have definitively provided a strong evidence that neutrinos change of flavour and , consequently , the existence of non - zero mass neutrinos . the recent results of kamland @xcite exclude all oscillation solutions but the large mixing angle solution to the solar neutrino problem using reactor antineutrino sources . however , neutrino oscillation experiments provide the squared mass difference between the neutrino species but not their absolute value and scale . the neutrinoless double beta decay would help to solve this question and to disentangle the hierarchy scheme of the neutrino flavours . most of the models ( see @xcite ) indicate that the majorana neutrino mass parameter could be around ( or slightly below ) @xmath70 ev , value within reach of the future double beta decay experiments , like cuore . majorana massive neutrinos are common predictions in most theoretical models , and the value of a few tens of millielectronvolts predicted for its effective mass , if reached experimentally -as expected- will test its majorana nature . double - beta decay experiments with even better sensitivities ( of the order of a few mev ) will be essential to fix the absolute neutrino mass scale and possibly to provide information on cp violation @xcite . on the other hand , galaxy formation requires a small amount of hot non - baryonic dark matter likely in form of neutrinos to match properly the observed spectral power at all scales of the universe . the question of the neutrino mass is one of the main issues in particle physics . in the standard model , neutrinos and antineutrinos are assumed to be different particles , but no experimental proof has been provided so far . nuclear double - beta decay addresses both questions : whether the neutrinos are self - conjugated and whether they have majorana mass . in fact , the lepton number violating neutrinoless double beta decay @xmath71 ( @xmath72 ) is the most direct way to determine if neutrinos are majorana particles . another form of neutrinoless decay , @xmath73 may reveal also the existence of the majoron ( @xmath74 ) , the goldstone boson emerging from the spontaneous symmetry breaking of the @xmath75 symmetry which is of most relevance in the generation of majorana neutrino mass and has far - reaching implications in astrophysics and cosmology . moreover , the observation of a @xmath72 decay would imply a lower bound for the neutrino mass , i. e. at least one neutrino eigenstate has a non - zero mass . it is quite straightforward to demonstrate how the determination of the effective majorana mass of the electron neutrino constrains the lightest neutrino mass eigenvalue . this was done recently by barger , glashow , marfatia and whistnant @xcite . however it is very convenient to use the approximation that @xmath76 and @xmath77 . with the further assumption @xmath78 in the normal hierarchy case we obtain : @xmath79 where @xmath80 . similarly in the case of inverted hierarchy : @xmath81 a related quantity , @xmath82 has great importance in cosmology . it is related to the quantity @xmath83 , the fraction of the critical density , @xmath84 ( that would close the universe ) that is in the form of neutrinos , where : @xmath85 and @xmath86 is the dimensionless hubble constant . it was shown in reference @xcite that @xmath87 obeys the following inequality with respect to @xmath88 : @xmath89 where the @xmath90 and @xmath91 signes refer to normal and inverted hierarchies respectively , and @xmath92 . if this relation is written as two equalities , and each side is solved for @xmath93 in terms of @xmath87 , quadratic equations result with the constant terms @xmath94 . values of @xmath95 of cosmological interest are much larger than @xmath96 ev ( 99.73% c.l . ) . accordingly the above inequality reduces to the trivial form : @xmath97 this clearly demonstrates the direct connection between neutrinoless double beta decay and neutrino dark matter . cosmic microwave background and galaxy cluster surveys have set the bound @xmath98 @xcite . it is expected that the map satellite will produce data that will result in a sensitivity @xmath99 . one possible interesting scenario results in the case the map satellite , if for example it observes a clear singal well above their limiting sensitivity , and cuore ( as well as other next generation experiments ) have a negative results at sensitivities of @xmath87 far below that of the satellite data . this would be a clear indication that the phenomenon causing the density fluctuations implied by the cmb data was not caused by majorana neutrino dark matter . in addition a positive measurement of the mass @xmath100 by katrin @xmath101 beta end - point spectrum measurement would have to yield @xmath102 . the cuore experiment will have a far greater sensitivity , and if it found a negative result , the mistery of dirac or majorana character of neutrinos will be solved . these and other issues , make the search for the neutrinoless double beta decay an invaluable tool for the exploration of non - standard model physics , probing energy scales well above those reachable with accelerators . that is the motivation of why there are dozens of experiments underway looking for the double beta decay of various nuclei @xcite like @xmath103 ( igex @xcite , heidelberg - moscow @xcite ) , @xmath104 and others ( nemo @xcite , elegants @xcite ) and @xmath16 ( midbd , cuoricino ) and a few big experimental projects , like cuore , majorana @xcite ( @xmath103 ) , moon @xcite ( @xmath104 ) and exo @xcite ( @xmath105 ) . the cryogenic thermal detectors provide new double - beta emitter nuclei to be explored in `` active '' source / detector calorimeters . some of them have been tested and others are already in running detectors , like @xmath106ca in caf@xmath3 , @xmath1te in teo@xmath3 , and @xmath107cd in cdwo@xmath108 . as far as the tellurium oxide is concerned , the @xmath1te isotope is a good candidate for double beta decay searches : its isotopic content in natural tellurium is 33.87% , and its 2@xmath14 q - value ( @xmath109 kev ) is reasonably high to escape from the main radioimpurity lines when looking for a neutrinoless signal . moreover , this q - value happens to be between the peak and the compton edge of the 2615 kev line of @xmath12tl , which leaves a clean window to look for the signal . finally , it has a fairly good neutrinoless nuclear factor - of - merit @xmath110 , where @xmath111 is an integrated kinematical factor qualifying the goodness of the @xmath112 value ( large phase space ) and @xmath113 is the neutrinoless double - beta decay nuclear matrix elements characterizing the likeliness of the transition . in table [ tab_doblebeta ] we quote the values of @xmath114 in the case of @xmath1te calculated in various nuclear models @xcite , together with those of other emitters used in source / detector calorimeters . it can be seen that no matter the nuclear model is used to compute the neutrinoless double - beta decay matrix elements , the merits of @xmath1te are a factor 510 more favorable than those of @xmath115ge ( the emitter where the best neutrinoless double beta decay half - life limits have been achieved so far ) , which translates into a factor 2 to 3 better as far as the @xmath116 ( majorana neutrino mass parameter ) bounds are concerned . the detector factor - of - merit @xmath117 , or detection sensitivity , introduced earlier by fiorini , provides an approximate estimate of the neutrinoless half - life limit achievable with a given detector . for source / detector devices , it reads : @xmath118 where @xmath119 is the atomic mass , @xmath120 is the isotopic abundance , @xmath121 the detector mass in kg , @xmath122 the background in c / kev / kg / y in the 2@xmath14 neutrinoless decay region , @xmath123 the running time in years , @xmath124 the fwhm energy resolution in kev and @xmath125 the detector efficiency ( which is 0.86 in the case of the cubic 5x5x5 @xmath126 crystals ) . in the case of a teo@xmath3 crystal detector , @xmath127 , with @xmath121 the crystal mass in kg and @xmath122 the background in counts per kev and year per kg of detector mass . a simple projection for cuoricino sensitivity can be obtained assuming a background of b=0.1 c / kev / kg / y ( as discussed in section 2 ) and a resolution of @xmath128 5 kev in the 2.5 mev region . in that case , one would have @xmath129 years , with @xmath121 ( kg ) the mass of the teo@xmath0 crystal array . for the mass of cuoricino ( m=40.7 kg ) , one will have a sensitivity of @xmath130 years . using a typical average value of @xmath131 y@xmath55 , as obtained in qrpa @xcite , cuoricino will have a mass sensitivity of @xmath132 ev in one year , in the least favourable case . notice that the bound on the effective mass of the electron neutrino , @xmath133 , is given by @xmath134 . using for comparison the value of @xmath135 y@xmath55 of ref . @xcite which is usually employed in the @xmath116 bound ( @xmath50.33 ev ) derived from the ge experiments , with these assumptions cuoricino would provide @xmath1360.24 ev . to go further , one needs to increase the mass of teo@xmath0 and to reach even a lower background . in our very conservative projection for the cuore array ( 760 kg of teo@xmath0 ) a background of b=0.01 c / kev / kg / y can be easly achieved , assuming as in the case of cuoricino a resolution @xmath124(2.5 mev)=5 kev , one would get @xmath137 years , which in one year of statistics would provide @xmath116 bounds ranging from 0.07 ev @xcite , 0.08 ev @xcite , 0.15 ev @xcite or 0.04 ev @xcite just to mention results using a few nuclear matrix element estimates . however , the r&d to be carried out in cuore , if succesful , would provide a value of @xmath138 c / kev / kg / y i.e. , a detection sensitivity of @xmath139 years , or @xmath116 bounds ranging from @xmath140 ev ( in @xcite ) to @xmath141 ev ( in @xcite ) . teo@xmath0 crystals made with @xmath142te enriched material have been already tested during the midbd experiment , making an enriched cuore a feasible option . assuming a 95% enrichment in @xmath142te and a background level of b=0.001 c / kev / kg / y , the sensitivity becomes @xmath143 years . for an exposure of 5 years , the corresponding @xmath144 bounds range from 9 mev to 56 mev depending on the nuclear matrix element calculations . recent cosmological observations @xcite provide compelling evidence for the existence of an important component of non - baryonic cold dark matter in the universe . among the candidates to compose this matter , weakly interacting massive particles ( wimps ) and axions are the front runners . the lightest stable particles of supersymmetric theories , like the neutralino @xcite , constitute a particular class of wimps . under the hypothesis that wimps are the main component of the dark matter , these particles should fill the galactic haloes and explain the flat rotation curves which are observed in many galaxies . the detection of such particles could be attempted both by means of direct and indirect methods . the direct detection of wimps relies on the measurement of their elastic scattering off the target nuclei of a suitable detector@xcite . the non relativistic and heavy ( gev tev ) wimps could hit a detector nucleus producing a nuclear recoil of a few kev . because of the small wimp - matter interaction cross sections the rate is extremely low . in the case of susy wimps , most of the cross section predictions @xcite ( derived using mssm as the basic frame implemented with different unification hypothesis ) encompass a range of values several orders of magnitude ( the so - called scatter plots ) providing rates ranging from 1 c / kg / day down to 10@xmath145 c / kg / day according to the particular susy model . it is well known that the predicted signal for the wimp elastic scattering has an exponentially decaying energy dependence , hardly distinguishable from the background recorded in the detector . the simple comparison of the theoretical wimp spectrum with the one experimentally obtained , provides an exclusion curve ( at a given confidence level ) , as dark matter component of the halo , of those wimps with masses ( @xmath146 ) and cross sections on nucleons ( @xmath147 ) which yield spectra above the measured experimental rate . to claim a positive identification of the wimp , however , a distinctive signature is needed . the only identification signals of the wimp explored up to now are provided by the features of the earth s motion with respect to the dark matter halo . in particular , the annual modulation @xcite is originated by the combination of the motion of the solar system in the galactic rest frame and the rotation of the earth around the sun . due to this effect , the incoming wimp s velocities in the detector rest frame change continuously during the year , having a maximum in summer and a minimum in winter . therefore the total wimp rate changes in time with an oscillating frequency which corresponds to an annual period and a maximum around the beginning of june . the relative annual variation of the signal is small ( a few percent ) so in order to detect it one needs large detector masses to increase statistics and several periods of exposure to minimize systematics . several experiments have already searched for this effect @xcite and since 1997 one group has reported a positive signal @xcite which has been appearing throughout four yearly periods . the present situation is no doubt exciting : on one hand that result has triggered an intense activity in the field ; on the other , the experimental sensitivities of various types of underground detectors are entering the supersymmetric parameter space @xcite and in particular several of them @xcite are excluding , to a larger or lesser degree , the region of mass and cross - section where the reported wimp is supposed to exist . new data from one of them @xcite have excluded totally the dama region . we will discuss in the following the capabilities of cuoricino and cuore to exclude or detect wimps using the total time - integrated experimental rate and comparing it with the predicted nuclear recoil rate . to look for the annual modulation signal in cuoricino / cuore experiments , which in principle have enough mass to be sensitive to it , one needs to know their stability performances . the analysis of the cuore / cuoricino potential for annual modulation searches will be performed -following statistical consideration- ( see ref . @xcite ) , with the proviso that systematic uncertainties are under control . data on the stability of cuoricino will be crucial to assess such hypotheses . to calculate the theoretical wimp rate , standard hypothesis and astrophysical parameters are assumed , i.e. , that the wimps form an isotropic , isothermal , non - rotating halo ( the isothermal sphere model ) of density @xmath148 gev/@xmath126 , which has a maxwellian velocity distribution with @xmath149 km / s ( with an upper cut corresponding to an escape velocity of 650 km / s ) , and a relative earth - halo velocity of @xmath150 km / s ) . other , more elaborated halo models , which have been considered recently @xcite would lead to different results . the same applies when other astrophysical parameters are employed or when uncertainties in the halo wimps velocity distribution are included @xcite . the theoretical predicted rate is expressed in terms of the mass and cross - section of the wimp - matter interaction . the cross sections are normalized per nucleon assuming a dominant scalar interaction , as is expected , for instance , for one of the most popular dark matter candidates , the neutralino : @xmath151 where @xmath119 is the target ( oxygen and tellurium ) mass number , @xmath152 , is the wimp - nucleus reduced mass , and @xmath153 the wimp - nucleon reduced mass . the helm parameterization @xcite is used for the scalar nucleon form factor . the @xmath154 exclusion plot is then derived by requiring the theoretically predicted signal for each @xmath146 and @xmath147 in each energy bin to be less than or equal to the ( 90% c.l . ) upper limit of the ( poisson ) recorded counts . the bin width is assumed to be equal to the detector resolution . in figure [ cuoricino_exclusion ] , the exclusion plots for coherent spin - independent wimp - matter interaction are shown for two possible values of the background of cuoricino , 1 and 0.1 c / kev / kg / day . the first value is of the order of the background already achieved from threshold onwards ( 10 - 50 kev ) in the midbd latest results ( see @xcite ) . the value 0.1 c / kev / kg / day is a one - order - of - magnitude extrapolation from that currently achieved in midbd ( see discussion on section 2 ) and is close to the one obtained above 50 kev . in the case of cuore , background values of 0.05 and 0.01 c / kev / kg / day will be assumed . notice , moreover , that values of a few 0.01 c / kev / kg / day have been obtained above 10 kev in the raw spectra of germanium experiments ( like igex @xcite ) without using mechanisms of background rejection , and so it does not seem impossible to achieve such equivalent small values in crystal thermal detectors of tellurium ( only phonons , and no discrimination mechanism ) . to draw the two exclusion contours of fig . [ cuoricino_exclusion ] , a low energy resolution of 1 kev and an energy threshold of 10 kev have been assumed as well as an exposure of 2 years of cuoricino ( 81 kg@xmath155year ) . the projected exclusion contours are compared with the one currently obtained from midbd ( dashed line ) . in figure [ cuore_exclusion ] , the exclusions for the two quoted values of the background of cuore , 0.05 and 0.01 c / kev / kg / day , are similarly presented for an exposure of 1 year ( 760 kg@xmath155year ) . as previously noted , cuore and to some extent cuoricino have detector masses large enough to search for the annual modulation signal . as it is well known , an essential requirement to estimate the prospects of any detector to search for annual modulation is to have a superb control of systematic errors and to assure that the stability of the various experimental parameters , which might mimic periodic variations of the signals , are kept within a small fraction of the ( already tiny ) expected signal . the various changes of the set - up , crystals and shielding of the midbd experiment have not provided a definitive estimation of the long - term stability parameters of midbd . possible instabilities are that of the electronic gain and the ensuing time fluctuation of the energy scale ( both in energy thresholds and energy resolutions ) , the temperature variations , the possible fluctuation in time of the efficiency with which the triggered noise is rejected and others . they must be kept well below the small expected seasonal modulation of the wimp signal the fact that we are dealing with a very small signal depending on time , which typically amounts to a fraction between 1% and 7% of the average count rates , reinforces the need for a control of the stability of the experiment well below that range over long periods of time . when assuming that all these fluctuations are controlled well below the levels needed ( @xmath561% ) , then one can proceed to analyze the sensitivity of cuoricino / cuore to the annual modulation signal on purely statistical grounds . this has been first attempted in @xcite and @xcite , but a more extensive and rigorous approach is followed in ref . @xcite where sensitivity plots for several types of detectors ( and experimental parameters ) are presented , and in particular , for cuore and cuoricino . the sensitivity of a given experimental device to the annual modulation signal ( according to the detector material employed and the experimental parameters of the detectors ) has been extensively studied in ref . @xcite on purely statistical grounds . following the guidelines of that reference , it can be precisely quantified by means of the @xmath156 parameter , defined from the likelihood function or , equivalently , from the @xmath157 function of the cosine projections of the data ( for further details see ref . @xcite ) : @xmath158 this parameter measures the statistical significance of the modulation signal detected in an experimental set of data . however , for a given ( @xmath159 ) and a given experiment the expected value @xmath160 can be estimated using the expression derived in ref . @xcite : @xmath161 where @xmath162 and @xmath163 are the modulated and non - modulated parts of the wimp signal in the @xmath164th energy bin of @xmath165 width , @xmath166 is the background in that energy bin and @xmath167 the effective exposure , being @xmath7 a coefficient accounting for the temporal distribution of the exposure time around modulation maxima and minima ( @xmath168 for @xmath169 temporal bins ) . using this equation we have estimated the region that could be within reach for cuore and cuoricino with the above mentioned assumptions on the background levels . we have fixed a value of 5.6 for @xmath160 that corresponds to 50% probability of obtaining a positive result at 90% c.l .. in figure [ cuoricino_mod ] curves are shown obtained for a threshold of 10 kev , two years of exposure with cuoricino ( 81 kg year ) and two assumed flat backgrounds of 1 and 0.1 c / kev / kg / day . one can see that cuoricino could already explore most of the dama region looking for a positive annual modulation signal . in figure [ cuore_mod ] similar curves are presented , assuming flat backgrounds of 0.05 and 0.01 c / kev / kg / day , two years of exposure of cuore ( 1500 kg year ) and a threshold of 10 kev ( solid lines ) . the possibility of a lower thresholds of 5 kev with a background of 0.01 c / kev / kg / day is also shown ( dashed line ) . in conclusion , cuore and cuoricino will be able to explore and/or exclude wimps lying in large regions of their parameter space . the capability of cuoricino / cuore to investigate the dama region through the exclusion plot ( time integrated method ) relies in getting a background of 0.1 c / kev / kg / day from 10 kev onwards , independently of more elaborated time modulation methods which require an exhaustive control of the stability of the experiment . however , cuoricino and cuore could also attempt to look for annual modulation of wimp signals provided that the stability of the experiment is sufficient . axions are light pseudoscalar particles which arise in theories in which the peccei - quinn u(1 ) symmetry has been introduced to solve the strong cp problem @xcite . they could have been produced in early stages of the universe being attractive candidates for the cold dark matter ( and in some particular scenarios for the hot dark matter ) responsible to 1/3 of the ingredients of a flat universe . dark matter axions can exist in the mass window @xmath170 ev @xmath171 ev , but hadronic axions could exist with masses around the ev . axions could also be copiously produced in the core of the stars by means of the primakoff conversion of the plasma photons . in particular , a nearby and powerful source of stellar axions would be the sun . the solar axion flux can be easily estimated @xcite within the standard solar model , resulting in an axion flux of an average energy of about 4 kev that can produce detectable x - rays when reconverted again in an electromagnetic field . moreover , it has been pointed out recently that the dimming of supernovae snia might be due to the conversion of photons into axions in the extra - galactic magnetic field @xcite . a photon - axion ( @xmath6-a ) oscillation could make unobservable about 1/3 of the sn emitted light and so , they would appear fainter than implied by the luminosity - distance versus redshift relation , without need to invoke an accelerated expansion of the universe . the sn result would be matched by axions of mass @xmath172 ev and coupling to photons @xmath173 gev@xmath55 . so stellar axions may play an important role in cosmology . we would like to stress that , although we focus on the axion because its special theoretical motivations , all this scenario is also valid for any generic pseudoscalar ( or scalar ) particle coupled to photons @xcite . needless to say that the discovery of any type of pseudoscalar or scalar particle would be extremely interesting in particle physics . we will keep our discussion , however , restricted to the case of solar axions . crystal detectors provide a simple mechanism for solar axion detection @xcite . axions can pass in the proximity of the atomic nuclei of the crystal where the intense electric field can trigger their conversion into photons . the detection rate is enhanced if axions from the sun coherently convert into photons when their incident angle with a given crystalline plane fulfills the bragg condition . this induces a correlation of the signal with the position of the sun which can be searched for in the data and allows for background subtraction . the potentiality of primakoff conversion in crystals relies in the fact that it can explore a range of axion masses ( @xmath174 kev ) not accessible to other direct searches . moreover it is a relatively simple technique that can be directly applied to detectors searching for wimps . primakoff conversion using a crystal lattice has already been employed in two germanium experiments : solax @xcite and cosme - ii @xcite with the ensuing limits for axion - photon coupling @xmath175 gev@xmath55 and @xmath176 gev@xmath55 respectively . also the dama collaboration has analyzed 53437 kg - day of data of their nai set up @xcite , in a search for solar axions , following the techniques developed in ref . @xcite , where a calculation of the perspectives of various crystals detectors ( including nai ) for solar axion searches has been made . the dama result @xmath177 gev@xmath55 improves slightly the limits obtained with other crystal detectors @xcite and agrees with the result predicted in ref . these `` crystal helioscopes '' constraints are stronger than that of the tokyo axion helioscope @xcite for @xmath178 ev and do not rely on astrophysical considerations ( i.e. on red giants or hb stars dynamics @xcite ) . the orientation of the crystal was not known so that the data were analyzed taking the angle corresponding to the most conservative limit . it has been noted that the model that yields the solar axion fluxes used to calculate the expected signals is not compatible with the constraints coming from helioseismology if @xmath179 gev@xmath55 @xcite . this would imply a possible inconsistency for solar axion limits above that value , and sets a minimal goal for the sensitivity of future experiments . the use of cuore to search for solar axions via bragg scattering should have a priori some advantages with respect to germanium detectors , because of the larger mass and the known orientation of the crystals . on the other hand , as the cross - section for primakoff conversion depends on the square of the atomic number , teo@xmath0 will be a priori a better candidate than germanium . needless to say that a low energy threshold is mandatory because the expected signal lies in the energy region 2 kev @xmath180 10 kev and is peaked at @xmath181 kev . a detailed analysis has been performed @xcite for a teo@xmath3 crystal ( which has a tetragonal structure @xcite ) assuming different values for the experimental parameters . as it is shown in ref . @xcite , the bound on axion - photon coupling which a given experiment can achieve can be estimated through the expression : @xmath182 where @xmath164 depends on the crystal structure and material , as well as on the experimental threshold and resolution . for the case of teo@xmath3 and a threshold of 5 kev , @xmath164 has been calculated to be @xmath183 assuming an energy resolution of 1 kev . the computation of this expression for some assumed values of the experimental parameters is shown in table [ tab_cuore ] for cuoricino and cuore . in all cases flat backgrounds and 2 years of exposure are assumed . it is worth noticing the faible dependence of the ultimate achievable axion - photon coupling bound on the experimental parameters , background and exposure mt : the 1/8 power dependence of @xmath184 on such parameters softens their impact in the final result . the best limit shown in table [ tab_cuore ] is in fact only one order of magnitude better than the present limits of solax and cosme - ii . the @xmath185 bound that cuore could provide is depicted comparatively to other limits in figure [ fig ] . the limit which can be expected from the cuoricino experiment is comparable to the helioseismological bound mentioned before ( see table [ tab_cuore ] ) . cuore could go even further ( see figure [ fig ] and table [ tab_cuore ] ) . notice that in both cases an energy threshold of @xmath186 kev ( and resolution of @xmath51 kev ) has been assumed . that value will be confirmed only after knowing the performances and preliminary runs of cuoricino . as was described at length in ref . @xcite , the crucial parameters for estimating the perspectives on solar axion detectors with crystals rely on the energy threshold and resolution ( appearing in @xmath164 ) , and the level of background achieved ( although the influence of this parameter is damped by a factor 1/8 ) . in particular , a threshold of 5 - 8 kev would loose most of the axion signal . other crystal detectors with , say , ge or nai ( genius , majorana , gedeon , dama , libra , anais , ) could surpass cuore as axion detectors because the energy thresholds of these projects are supposed to be significantly lower . also the background is expected to be better . nevertheless , it should be stressed that the bounds on @xmath187 obtained with this technique in the various proposed crystal detector arrays stagnate at a few @xmath188 gev@xmath55 , not too far from the goal expected for cuore , as has been demonstrated in @xcite . there are no realistic chances to challenge the limit inferred from hb stars counting in globular clusters @xcite and a discovery of the axion by cuore would presumably imply either a systematic effect in the stellar - count observations in globular clusters or a substantial change in the theoretical models that describe the late - stage evolution of low - metallicity stars . to obtain lower values of @xmath185 one should go to the magnet helioscopes like that of tokio @xcite and that of cern ( cast experiment @xcite currently being mounted ) . in particular , the best current experimental bound of @xmath185 published comes from the tokyo helioscope : @xmath189 gev@xmath55 for @xmath190 ev and @xmath191 gev@xmath55 for @xmath192 ev . the sensitivity of cast is supposed to provide a bound @xmath193 gev@xmath55 or even lower . a recent , preliminary run of cast , with only @xmath55 hours of `` axion light '' has improved already the tokyo limit . we have reported the perspectives of cuore , a projected massive 760 kg array of 1000 teo@xmath3 bolometers , and of its first stage cuoricino , with 40 kg of the same crystals , as far as their physics potential to detect various types of rare events is concerned . the estimated background and resolution , based on monte carlo studies , together with the results obtained in recent improvements in the performances of the midbd experiment and the information obtained from the preliminary tests of cuoricino , have allowed us to assess the potentialities of these experiments for double beta decay searches , solar axion detection and wimp exclusion or identification . in these three types of searches , cuore and to some extent cuoricino will be powerful tools to explore , with higher sensitivity , such rare phenomena . this work has been partially supported by the spanish cicyt ( contract aen99 - 1033 ) , italian infn , the us national science foundation and the eu network ( contract erb - fmrx - ct-98 - 0167 ) . thanks are due to our student f. capozzi for the work done on the mc simulations , and to g. luzon for discussions on the cosmogenic activation of the crystals . booth , b. cabrera and e. fiorini , ann . nucl . part . * 46 * ( 1996 ) 471 . k. pretzl , nucl . intrum . and meth . a * 454 * ( 2000 ) 114 . e. fiorini , nucl . * 91 * ( 2001 ) 262 . l. mosca , review talk given at the impf2002 , feb . 2002 , jaca , huesca ( spain ) , to appear in nucl . b proc.suppl . 2003 . for a recent survey of wimp detection , see for instance a. morales , nucl . * 87 * ( 2000 ) 477 [ astro - ph/9912554 ] and review talk given at taup 2001 , sept . 2001 , lngs , [ astro - ph/0112550 ] , nucl . * 110 * ( 2002 ) 39 . r. abusaidi _ et al . _ [ cdms collaboration ] , phys . * 84 * ( 2000 ) 5699 [ astro - ph/0002471 ] . d. abrams _ et al . _ [ cdms collaboration ] , [ astro - ph/0203500 ] . a. benoit _ et al . _ [ edelweiss collaboration ] , phys . * b513 * ( 2001 ) 15 [ astro - ph/0106094 ] . g. gerbier , talk given at neutrino 2002 , munich 30 may 2002 . m. altmann _ et al _ , proceedings of the x international symposium on lepton and photon interactions at high energies , 2001 , [ astro - ph/0106314 ] . j. jochum _ et al _ , nucl . b. ( proc . suppl . ) 87 ( 2000 ) 70 . r. bernabei _ et al . _ [ dama collaboration ] , phys . b * 480 * ( 2000 ) 23 ; r. bernabei _ et al . _ [ dama collaboration ] , phys . b * 450 * ( 1999 ) 448 ; r. bernabei _ et al . _ , phys . b * 424 * ( 1998 ) 195 . s. cebrin _ et al . _ , . suppl . * 110 * ( 2002 ) 94 , [ hep - ex/0111075 ] . a. morales _ et al . _ [ igex collaboration ] , phys . b * 489 * ( 2000 ) 268 [ hep - ex/0002053 ] ; a. morales _ et al . _ [ igex collaboration ] , phys . b * 532 * ( 2002 ) 8 [ hep - ex/0110061 ] . d. gonzalez _ et al . _ , nucl . * 87 * ( 2000 ) 278 . h. v. klapdor - kleingrothaus _ et al . _ , eur . phys . j. a * 12 * ( 2001 ) 147 . a. alessandrello _ et al . _ , submitted to nim a , `` cuore : a cryogenic underground observatory for rare events '' . the evaluation of cosmogenic activation is obtained with a code based on the measured cosmic ray flux and on the interaction cross sections contained in the following articles : r. silberberg and r. tsao , astrophys . * 220 * ( 1973 ) 315 for an updated review , see for instance a. morales , nucl . * 77 * ( 1999 ) 335 [ hep - ph/9809540 ] ; h. ejiri , nucl . phys . * 91 * ( 2001 ) 255 . e. fiorini , nucl . * 91 * ( 2001 ) 262 and o. cremonesi , review talk given at neutrino 2002 , munich , 30 may 2002 . w. hampel _ _ , the gallex collaboration , phys . lett . * b 388 * , 384 ( 1996 ) ; g. n. abdurashitov _ _ , the sage collaboration , phys . * 77 * , 4708 ( 1996 ) ; b. t. cleveland _ et al . _ , astrophysics j. * 496 * , 505 ( 1998 ) ; r. davis , prog . part . phys . * 32 * , 13 ( 1994 ) ; y.fukuda _ et al . lett . * 86 * , 5651 ( 2001 ) ; * 86 * , 5656 ( 2001 ) . q. r. ahmad _ et al . _ [ sno collaboration ] , phys . rev . lett . * 87 * ( 2001 ) 071301 , [ nucl - ex/0106015 ] . s. pascoli and s. t. petcov , phys . b 544 ( 2002 ) 239 , [ hep - ph/0205022 ] . b. kayser , talk given at neutrino 2002 , 30 may 2002 . j. g. hirsh _ et al . _ , a589 * ( 1995 ) 445 ; c. r. ching _ et al . _ , phys . rev . * c40 * ( 1984 ) 304 ; x. r. wu _ et al . _ , phys . lett . * b272 * ( 1991 ) 169 ; x. r. wu _ et al . lett * b276 * ( 1992 ) 274 e. caurier _ et al . _ , rev . lett . * 77 * ( 1996 ) 54 ; retamosa _ et al . _ , phys . rev . * 51 * ( 1995 ) 371 ; a. poves _ et al . _ , phys . lett . * b361 * ( 1995 ) 1 ; e. caurier _ et al . _ , nucl . phys . * a654 * ( 1999 ) 973c . a. k. drukier , k. freese and d. n. spergel , phys . d * 33 * ( 1986 ) 3495 . sarsa , a. morales , j. morales , e. garca , a. ortiz de solrzano , j. puimedn , c. senz , a. salinas , j.a . villar , _ phys . lett . _ * b386 * ( 1996 ) 458 . d. abriola , f.t . avignone , iii , r.l . brodzinski , j.i . collar , d.e . di gregorio , h.a . farach , e. garca , a.o . gattone , c.k . gurard , f. hasenbalg , h. huck , h.s . miley , a. morales , j. morales , a. ortiz de solrzano , j. puimedn , j.h . reeves , a. salinas , m.l . sarsa , j.a . villar , _ astrop . * 10 * ( 1999 ) 133 . s. cebrian _ et al . _ , astropart . * 14 * ( 2001 ) 339 [ hep - ph/9912394 ] . f. donato , n. fornengo and s. scopel , astropart . * 9 * ( 1998 ) 247 [ hep - ph/9803295 ] ; m. kamionkowski and a. kinkhabwala , phys . rev . * d 57 * ( 1998 ) 3256 [ hep - ph/9710337 ] ; j. d. vergados , phys . rev . * 83 * ( 1999 ) 3597 ; j. d. vergados , phys . rev . * d62 * ( 2000 ) 023519 [ astro - ph/0001190 ] ; p. ullio and m. kamionkowski , jhep 0103 ( 2001 ) 049 [ hep - ph/0006183 ] ; a. m. green , phys.rev . * d63 * ( 2001 ) 043005 [ astro - ph/0008318 ] ; c. j. copi , j. heo and l. m. krauss , phys.lett . * b461 * ( 1999 ) 43 ; p. belli _ et al . _ , [ hep - ph/0203242 ] . m. brhlik and l. roszkowski , phys . lett . * b464 * ( 1999 ) ; p. belli , r. bernabei , a. bottino , f. donato , n. fornengo , d. prosperi y s. scopel , phys . * d61 * ( 2000 ) 023512 [ hep - ph/9903501 ] ; a. bottino , f. donato , n. fornengo and s. scopel , phys . rev . * d62 * ( 2000 ) 056006 [ hep - ph/0001309 ] . r. d. peccei and h. r. quinn , phys . * 38 * ( 1977 ) 1440 . k. van bibber , p. m. mcintyre , d. e. morris and g. g. raffelt , phys . d * 39 * ( 1989 ) 2089 . r. j. creswick , f. t. avignone , h. a. farach , j. i. collar , a. o. gattone , s. nussinov and k. zioutas , phys . * b427 * ( 1998 ) 235 [ hep - ph/9708210 ] . c. csaki , n. kaloper and j. terning , phys . * 88 * ( 2002 ) 161302 . f. t. avignone , d. abriola , r. l. brodzinski , j. i. collar , r. j. creswick , d. e. digregorio , h. a. farach , a. o. gattone , c. k. gurard , f. hasenbalg , h. huck , h. s. miley , a. morales , j. morales , s. nussinov , a. ortiz de solrzano , j. h. reeves , j. a. villar , and k. zioutas , phys . rev . * 81 * ( 1998 ) 5068 [ astro - ph/9708008 ] . i. g. irastorza , s. cebrian , e. garca , d. gonzalez , a. morales , j. morales , a. ortiz de solrzano , a. peruzzi , j. puimedn , m.l . sarsa , s. scopel and j.a . villar , nucl . * 87 * ( 2000 ) 102 [ astro - ph/9912491 ] ; a. morales , f.t . avignone iii , r.l . brodzinski , s. cebrin , e. garca , d. gonzlez , i.g . irastorza , h.s . miley , j. morales , a. ortiz de solrzano , j. puimedn , j.h . reeves , m.l . sarsa , s. scopel , j.a . villar , astropart . * 16 * ( 2002 ) 325 [ hep - ex/0101037 ] f. t. avignone iii _ et al . _ , suppl . ) 72 ( 1999 ) 176 . s. cebrian , e. garca , d. gonzalez , i.g . irastorza , a. morales , j. morales , a. ortiz de solrzano , j. puimedn , a. salinas , m.l . sarsa , s. scopel , j.a . villar , astropart . * 10 * ( 1999 ) 397 [ astro - ph/9811359 ] . y. inoue , t. namba , s. moriyama , m. minowa , y. takasu , t. horiuchi and a. yamamoto , [ astro - ph/0204338 ] . for an updated review see , for instance , p. sikivie , nucl . * 87 * ( 2000 ) 41 and g. raffelt , nucl . * 77 * ( 1999 ) 459 . [ hep - ph/9806506 ] ) plane for cuoricino , assuming a threshold of 10 kev , flat background @xmath195 1 ( solid line ) and 0.1 c / kev / kg / day ( dashed line ) and two years of exposure ( 81 kg year ) . it has been calculated for @xmath196 5.6 ( see the text ) . the closed contour represents the 3@xmath147 cl region singled out by the modulation analysis performed by the dama experiment @xcite.,scaledwidth=100.0% ] ) plane for cuore , assuming a threshold of 10 kev , two years of exposure ( 1500 kg year ) and flat backgrounds of 0.05 and 0.01 c / kev / kg / day . it has been calculated for @xmath196 5.6 ( see the text ) . the sensitivity curve has been also calculated for a possible threshold of 5 kev with a background of 0.01 c / kev / kg / day ( dashed line ) . the closed contour represents the 3@xmath147 cl region singled out by the modulation analysis performed by the dama experiment @xcite.,scaledwidth=100.0% ] Abstract:
[ "the cuore ( _ cryogenic underground observatory for rare events _ ) experiment projects to construct and operate an array of 1000 cryogenic thermal detectors of teo@xmath0 , of a mass of 760 g each , to investigate rare events physics , in particular , double beta decay and non baryonic particle dark matter . a first step towards cuore is cuoricino , an array of 62 of bolometers , currently being installed in the gran sasso laboratory . in this paper we report the physics potential of both stages of the experiment regarding neutrinoless double beta decay of @xmath1te , wimp searches and solar axions . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ( the cuore collaboration ) pacs : 23.40.-s ; 95.35.+d ; 14.80.mz _ key words _ : underground detectors ; double beta decay ; dark matter ; wimps ; axions ." ]
13,507
13,507
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: chaos in ordinary language means disorder , randomness , absence of law , and unpredictability . it played the major role in philosophy of ancient greeks . already empedocles ( cca.490430 b.c . ) viewed the real world , , as a combination of the world of perfect order , ( today we may tentatively translate it as ) , and the world of complete disorder , . since chaos seemed to be too elusive for any kind of rigorous description , the attention of science has for long been focused only to sphairos . this has changed over the past decades when numerous explorations have shown that chaos is not as lawless as originally thought . at present , the term _ chaos theory _ belongs to the common speak @xcite . in both classical and quantum physics @xcite is built on very sophisticated mathematics . it sticks on the original idea of randomness , but at the same time it creates a new type of universality in the representation of reality . the universality of chaos is based on ergodic character of motions and implies high efficiency of the statistically oriented description . since majority of systems in nature are chaotic , at least to a considerable extent , this type of description is often the ultimate one . the routes to more deterministic descriptions may exist but they are usually impassable . chaos thus belongs to very fundamental subjects in physics . among the physical systems that materialize the signatures of chaos in nature , an important place is held by atomic nuclei . already the fact that even more than 80 years after the discovery of their composition we are not able to present a satisfactory microscopic theory of nuclear structure is a good reason to think that nuclei are indeed chaotic objects par excellence . it is not an accident that nuclei were at dawn of the field named quantum chaos . however , atomic nuclei not only show well recognized signs of chaos , they also provide a variety of models that can be used to better understand the rules of chaos in a more general context . such a path is followed in this text . our aim is not to draw an exhaustive map of the overlap between physics of chaos and physics of nuclei such reviews exist @xcite and we may only recommend to read them . instead , we want to make a passage through selected topics of classical and quantum chaos using models taken from the description of nuclear collective dynamics . before diving into the ocean of chaos , we have to briefly introduce the models we will be playing with . these are the old ( and the good ) geometric collective model ( below abbreviated as gcm ) and the newer and more sophisticated interacting boson model ( ibm ) of nuclei . both these models attempt to describe nuclear collective motions vibrations and rotations assuming only the quadrupole type of nuclear deformations . the number of degrees of freedom associated with both gcm and ibm is five . two degrees of freedom correspond to the quadrupole deformation of the nucleus in the body - fixed frame ( one can think of an ellipsoid with a fixed volume ) ; their dynamics therefore represents vibrational motions . the other three degrees of freedom correspond to the orientation of the whole nucleus in the laboratory frame they describe rotations . in the following we will mostly consider only the non - rotational case , i.e. , fix the angular momentum ( which is an integral of motions ) to zero . in this case , we will be left just with two vibrational degrees of freedom , opening a direct link to other @xmath0 systems famously studied in the context of chaos . we will see that nuclear vibrations represent a rather rich specimen of chaos in two dimensions . the gcm , introduced already in 1952 by a.bohr ( for the review see @xcite ) , treats the nucleus as structureless drop described by quadrupole shape variables @xmath1 and rotation euler angles @xmath2 . these 5 generalized coordinates are associated with a particular parametrization of the rank-2 tensor @xmath3 ( real , symmetric , and traceless in the cartesian form ) , describing the quadrupole deformation of the nucleus in the laboratory frame . the deformation tensor @xmath3 can be introduced via the expansion of the nuclear radius @xmath4 to spherical harmonics @xmath5 , or alternatively via multipole moments of the nuclear mass ( charge ) distribution @xmath6 . in the first case , the @xmath7 spherical component of the deformation tensor ( @xmath8,@xmath9,@xmath10 ) is associated with the coefficient ( up to complex conjugation ) at the @xmath11 term of the radius expansion . in the second case , the deformation tensor is obtained via the following integral ( up to a scaling factor ) of the mass ( charge ) density : @xmath12 . any variables describing the shape of the nucleus must be invariant under rotations of the nucleus as a whole . there are just two independent building blocks for all rotational invariants made of the quadrupole deformation tensor namely the quadratic and cubic couplings of the quadrupole tensor to zero total angular momentum . the shape variables @xmath13 and @xmath14 can be defined as a certain parameterization of these two elementary couplings:^{(\lambda)}$ ] of rank-@xmath15 and -@xmath16 spherical tensors @xmath17 and @xmath18 to the resulting spherical tensor of rank @xmath19 ( the definition is analogous to the elementary angular momentum coupling ) . scalar product of spherical tensors is defined for @xmath20 as @xmath21^{(0)}$ ] . ] @xmath22^{(0)}=\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\ \beta^2 \ , \qquad [ [ \alpha^{(2)}\times\alpha^{(2)}]^{(2)}\times\alpha^{(2)}]^{(0)}=-\sqrt{7}\ \beta^3\cos 3\gamma \label{bega } \,.\ ] ] alternatively , @xmath13 and @xmath14 can be derived from the eigenvalues of @xmath3 , which read as @xmath23 $ ] , @xmath24 , @xmath25\bigr)$ ] . these values are the only components of the deformation tensor in the intrinsic frame ( if ) of the nucleus ( the frame connected with the principal axes of the quadrupole deformation ) , where the deformation tensor is diagonal . the transformation between the if and laboratory frame ( lf ) is expressed in terms of the euler angles @xmath2 , describing the orientation of the deformed nucleus in lf . ) with the same choice of parameters . adapted from ref.@xcite . ] note that @xmath1 can be considered as radial coordinates in the cartesian plane @xmath26 . while the radius @xmath13 quantifies the degree of deformation of the nucleus ( @xmath27 for spherical shape ) , the angle @xmath14 parameterizes the type of the deformed shape . the plane is divided into six equivalent angular sectors , which follow from an inherent discrete symmetry of the problem , given by the dynamical equivalence of three possible orientations of the deformed shape in the if ( along @xmath28 ) and two deformation types ( prolate , oblate ) . the @xmath29 , @xmath30 , and @xmath31 axially symmetric prolate or oblates shapes are located at @xmath14 equal to @xmath32 , @xmath33 , and @xmath34 , respectively , while the intermediate @xmath14 values correspond to the related triaxial shapes . note that these conclusions are consistent with the above - given form of the deformation tensor in the intrinsic frame . to become more familiar with the formalism ( which , as one has to agree , looks rather tough as the first sight ) , the reader is encouraged to consult specialized literature , e.g. , ref.@xcite . the plane of deformation coordinates with the basic sample of shapes is depicted in fig.[begafi ] . the momenta associated with the coordinates @xmath13 and @xmath14 are denoted as @xmath35 and @xmath36 , respectively . in the non - rotational case , as noted above , the euler angles @xmath2 are fixed , rendering zero values of the associated rotational momenta . the resulting vibrational hamiltonian therefore contains just the shape variables @xmath1 and the corresponding momenta @xmath37 . our analysis is performed mostly with the hamiltonian which contains purely quadratic momentum term of the kinetic energy , and quadratic , cubic and quartic coordinate terms of the potential energy : @xmath38}_{t_{\rm vib}}+\underbrace{a\beta^2+b\beta^3\cos 3\gamma+c\beta^4}_{v_{\rm vib}}\ , . \label{hgcm}\ ] ] @xmath39 and @xmath40 are adjustable parameters satisfying physical constraints @xmath41 ( kinetic energy is positive ) and @xmath42 ( the potential is confining ) . the geometric hamiltonian ( [ hgcm ] ) is closely related to the famous hnon - heiles hamiltonian , which was originally introduced in the context of stellar dynamics in galaxies and became a paradigmatic example of chaos in the classical domain @xcite . the hnon - heiles hamiltonian is a special case of eq.([hgcm ] ) with @xmath43 . in this contribution ( as in ref.@xcite ) we claim that the inclusion of the confining @xmath44 term generates even much richer structures than those obtained in the @xmath43 case . the coexistence of regular and chaotic types of classical motions generated by the full geometric hamiltonian at high energies is illustrated in fig.[begafi ] . the two trajectories shown in this figure were calculated for the same model parameters and energy , but represent very dissimilar species of collective motions . the regular orbit corresponds to a moderate , highly organized vibration , localized in a relatively small region around an axially symmetric equilibrium shape ( above the potential well to which the nucleus with given parameters drops in the low energy limit ) . in contrast , the chaotic orbit represents some large - amplitude vibrations , which rather disorderly wander through small , medium and large oblate deformations with all three intrinsic orientations . a generalization of the simple hamiltonian ( [ hgcm ] ) can be achieved by considering higher - order terms in kinetic or potential energy . we consider two extensions of the kinetic energy , particularly @xcite : @xmath45 \,,\qquad t_{\rm vib}^{(ii)}=\frac{1}{2m(1+\kappa\beta^2)}\left[p_\beta^2+\left(\frac{p_\gamma}{\beta}\right)^2\right ] \ , , \label{halt}\ ] ] both based on some specific deformation - dependent effective mass ( @xmath46 is an additional model parameter ) . such or similar extensions of the effective mass are relevant for the description of nuclear rotational bands since they modify the behavior of nuclear moments of inertia . here we consider them to probe the sensitivity of the vibrational measures of chaos to the general form of the hamiltonian kinetic term . another extension of the above hamiltonian is the inclusion of rotational terms , containing the intrinsic components of angular momentum and the corresponding moments of inertia . this however leads beyond the 2d description and makes the analysis much more difficult . we follow this line only in rather a restricted manner considering only rotations around a fixed axis @xmath31 @xcite . this can be done by introducing a third collective coordinate , angle @xmath47 , and the associate momentum @xmath48 , which coincides with the angular momentum of the nucleus around @xmath31 in both laboratory and intrinsic frames . the quadrupole deformation tensor @xmath49 in the laboratory frame is obtained from the diagonal form @xmath50 in the intrinsic frame ( see above ) via rotation by angle @xmath51 around the @xmath31-axis . this identifies @xmath47 as a variable connected with the if @xmath52 lf transition . the rotational energy reads as : @xmath53 which has to be added to the vibrational hamiltonian in eq.([hgcm ] ) to get the total hamiltonian @xmath54 . details can be found in ref.@xcite . an important feature of the geometric hamiltonian is related to its scaling properties the fact that dynamics of the system must be invariant under scale transformations affecting the units of relevant quantities , i.e. , energy , coordinate , and momentum . let us return now to the bare vibrational hamiltonian ( [ hgcm ] ) . since the scale transformations of this form can be absorbed in parameters @xmath55 , we deduce that some choices of these parameters must be dynamically equivalent . a more detailed treatment @xcite shows that the quantity @xmath56 is invariant under all scale transformation and represents the only essential parameter of the bare vibrational model in the classical case . the value of the mass parameter @xmath40 is relevant only in the quantum case , weighting the absolute density of quantum states in the discrete energy spectrum ( for @xmath57 we get the classical limit with infinite state density ) . this effective parameter reduction implies a crucial simplification of the numerical analysis of the geometric model . the quantization of the nuclear geometric model is achieved by replacing individual terms in the gcm hamiltonian by the corresponding operators in the hilbert space of wavefunctions @xmath58 . this task is mathematically rather involved and was completed with a substantial contribution of the patron of this school , marcos moshinsky see , e.g. , refs.@xcite and many others . the basic form of the vibrational kinetic energy reads as follows : @xmath59 note that this operator acts in the space where the scalar product @xmath60 is given by an integration over the collective coordinates with a specific measure @xcite . the expression of the potential @xmath61 is the same as in the classical case , see eq.([hgcm ] ) . since we are mostly interested in the non - rotational motions , the rotational energy will not be included into the quantized hamiltonian . examining eq.([tqgcm ] ) one immediately notices the differences from the kinetic energy of a particle in a 2d space , which in polar coordinates @xmath62 reads as @xmath63 . the absence of euler angles in the description of vibrational motions suggests a possibility to quantize the vibrational energy in the standard 2d manner , i.e. , using the formula : @xmath64 note that this implies a change of the definition of scalar product and the necessity to impose the condition @xmath65 to keep link with the 5d quantization , where this condition is naturally satisfied . in addition , we choose one of two possible angle - reflection symmetries of the wavefunctions , namely @xmath66 . we therefore construct three different quantizations of the vibrational collective hamiltonian , all of them yielding the same classical limit : the 2d - even , 2d - odd , and the 5d quantizations ( in the 5d case , the reflection symmetry is fixed ) . from the viewpoint of nuclear theory , only the 5d option is correct , but from the viewpoint of chaos theory ( which is in our focus here ) we have the freedom to probe all three possibilities . we will use this freedom to check the influence of the quantization scheme on the signatures of quantum chaos . for details , see ref.@xcite . let us move to the alternative description of nuclear collective motions with the aid of the interacting boson model . the ibm , introduced in 1970 s by f.iachello and a.arima ( for a review see @xcite ) , does a similar job as the gcm , but in terms of an ensemble of bosons with angular momentum 0 ( @xmath67-bosons ) and 2 ( @xmath68-bosons ) . these bosons are commonly interpreted as an approximation for nucleon pairs in an even - even nucleus ( their total number @xmath69 is usually fixed at a half of the number of valence nucleons ) , but at the same time they give rise to quadrupole degrees of freedom needed to describe basic collective motions of nuclei . the @xmath67- and @xmath68-bosons live in a hilbert space associated solely with their spin degree of freedom ( such space has a finite dimension ) and interact with each other through two - body interactions . for instance , a popular form of the hamiltonian is composed of the @xmath68-boson number operator @xmath70 and a bosonic quadrupole operator @xmath71 as follows : @xmath72)^{(2)}}_{\hat{q}_\chi}\cdot\underbrace{(d^\dag s+s^\dag\tilde{d}+\chi[d^\dag\times\tilde{d}])^{(2)}}_{\hat{q}_\chi } \ , , \label{hibm}\ ] ] where we used @xmath68-boson annihilation operators @xmath73 having proper transformation properties of a rank-2 tensor . the parameters @xmath74 and @xmath75 , weighting both terms in eq.([hibm ] ) , are more or less arbitrary , while @xmath76 from the quadrupole operator varies within interval @xmath77 for prolate shapes and @xmath78 $ ] for oblate shapes . note that the @xmath70 term of the above hamiltonian is of the 1-body nature and the term @xmath79 generates specific 2-body interactions . the link between the bosonic hamiltonian la ( [ hibm ] ) and the geometric hamiltonian of the type ( [ hgcm ] ) goes via the use of coherent states in the ibm . for instance , the glauber type of coherent states with an average total number of boson equal to @xmath69 is given by : ) onto a subspace with a sharp boson number , yielding a bosonic condensate state . ] @xmath80\ket{0 } \label{glau } \,,\ ] ] where @xmath81 stands for a normalization factor to ensure @xmath82 . the complex variables @xmath83 ( with @xmath84 ) which parameterize the coherent state , have transformation properties of a rank-2 spherical tensor and can be associated with a linear combination of the deformation tensor @xmath3 and the tensor of associated momenta @xmath85 . performing the same gymnastics as in the gcm case ( for details see ref.@xcite ) , one obtains the five generalizad collective coordinates @xmath86 and the corresponding momenta . the general bosonic hamiltonian @xmath87 is then translated into a function of these canonical variables by evaluating its expectation value in the respective coherent state @xmath88 . in the @xmath89 limit , this function coincides with the classical hamiltonian @xmath90 associated with @xmath87 . and @xmath91 , using two truncation dimensions of the hamltonian matrix expressed in the 2d oscillator basis , namely @xmath9239905 and 59080 . panel ( a ) shows a quantum measure of chaos @xmath93 ( where @xmath94 is so - called brody parameter of the nearest - neighbor spacing distribution ; for explanation see below ) calculated for spectra determined by a numerical diagonalization in both truncated bases . panels ( b ) and ( c ) show the absolute and relative differences between individual level energies , @xmath95 and @xmath96 , respectively . it is seen that at a certain energy the two calculations yield diverging results . only the fraction of the spectrum below the vertical dashed line ( corresponding to less than a half of the smaller dimension ) is reproduced correctly . adapted from ref.@xcite . ] for instance , hamiltonian ( [ hibm ] ) yields the following classical limit @xcite : @xmath97\sqrt{1-\frac{t+\beta^2}{2 } } \nonumber\\ & & \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\ ! -\frac{2\chi^2 b}{7}\left[\left(\frac{t+\beta^2}{2}\right)^2-p_\gamma^2\right ] \ , , \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad t = p_\beta^2+\left(\frac{p_\gamma}{\beta}\right)^2 \label{hibmclas } \,.\end{aligned}\ ] ] it needs to be stressed , with regard to the boundedness of the ibm energy spectrum , that the coordinates and momenta appearing in the coherent - state parameterization are restricted only to finite domains , namely : @xmath98 $ ] , @xmath99 $ ] , and @xmath100 $ ] . thus the square root in eq.([hibmclas ] ) is always well defined . we may conclude that the ibm classical hamiltonians are closely related to the gcm hamiltonians , discussed above , though by far not identical with them . the most important difference between both models lies in the kinetic energy terms , which have a much more complex form in the ibm case . on the other hand , the potential energy terms , which can be extracted from the hamiltonian by setting all momenta to zero , are rather similar and yield analogous dynamical features . in conclusion of this section we say a few words on numerical computations . classical trajectories for both gcm and ibm are determined with the aid of the fourth - order runge - kutta integration of the classical equations of motions . some details can be found in ref.@xcite . quantum spectra are obtained through a numerical diagonalization of the respective quantum hamiltonian . calculations within the ibm ( which has just a finite dimensional hilbert space ) are naturally done in the complete basis composed of states with different numbers @xmath67- and @xmath68-bosons , coupled to definite angular momenta . the calculations in gcm ( infinite dimensional space ) has to be performed in a truncated basis . the results of these must be checked for convergence . let us streess that due to the restriction to the subset of the quantum spectrum with angular momentum @xmath101 , we perform all gcm calculations in two dimensions . in general , only a certain fraction of the gcm states obtained by the numerical diagonalization within a truncated 2d basis can be employed in the analyses . as illustrated in fig.[egcm ] , these converged states yield unambiguous and reliable results . in physics , we like most to deal with integrable systems . these are the systems which roughly speaking have a sufficiently large degree of symmetry to make the dynamical equations solvable . more precisely @xcite , the full integrability of a classical hamiltonian system with @xmath102 degrees of freedom requires the following three conditions to be simultaneously satisfied : ( a ) there exists @xmath102 integrals of motions @xmath103 ( @xmath104 ) , represented as functions in the @xmath105-dimensional phase space which have zero poisson bracket with the hamiltonian , @xmath106 , ( b ) all these integrals are mutually , i.e. , have vanishing poisson brackets with each other , @xmath107 @xmath108 ( in quantum mechanics , we would say : they are compatible ) , and ( c ) the @xmath105-dimensional gradients @xmath109 are all linearly independent in every point of the phase space . these conditions guarantee that the hamiltonian ( as well as any other conserved quantity ) can be written as a function of the given integrals , @xmath110 , and that there exists a canonical transformation @xmath111 to some new variables ( so - called action - angle variables ) in terms of which the solution of the hamilton equations becomes rather trivial ( the transformation itself being usually highly nontrivial ) . for example , the dynamics of the geometric collective model and the interacting boson model is integrable if the corresponding hamiltonian does not depend on variable @xmath14 . then the momentum @xmath36 becomes an integral of motion , in addition to the hamiltonian @xmath112 itself . it is easy to verify that all three conditions for integrability in dimension @xmath0 are fulfilled in this situation : ( a ) and ( b ) are obvious , and ( c ) follows from the fact that the gradient of @xmath112 is a nonvanishing normal to the energy surface , while the gradient of @xmath36 is a nonvanishing tangent therefore , they always define two perpendicular directions . as we see from eqs.([hgcm ] ) and ( [ hibmclas ] ) , the gcm and ibm hamiltonians are independent of @xmath14 ( hence integrable ) for @xmath113 and @xmath114 , respectively . the @xmath36-dependent integral of motion is usually written in a less trivial form @xcite : @xmath115 ( where @xmath116 are components of the angular momentum @xmath117 in the if ) , which defines a quantity in the nuclear context called . note that the rigorous proof of integrability in the full dimension @xmath118 ( including rotational degrees of freedom ) requires a construction of the fifth integral of motions , which is additional to @xmath112 , @xmath119 , @xmath120 , and @xmath121 . the ibm hamiltonian ( [ hibm ] ) has an extra realization of integrability , situated at the points @xmath122 of the parameter space ( @xmath75 remains an arbitrary scaling parameter ) . it can be shown that this case of integrability of the ibm hamiltonian is connected with its underlying su(3 ) dynamical symmetry @xcite . ( red and blue dots ) and @xmath123 ( black dot ) . the two cases , differing just by a small displacement of the lighter body , show rather different sets of trajectories . exponentially diverging distance between both alternative positions of the lighter body is shown in the inset . adapted from ref.@xcite . ] for 3-body system ) . panel ( a ) shows evolution of initially close trajectories for times @xmath124 units , in which the deviation is not large . panel ( b ) displays the evolution for times @xmath125 units , the two final positions represented by the blue and red dots ( with the corresponding shapes drawn aside ) . note that long - time deviation between the two vibrational orbits ( given in the inset ) reaches a saturation regime , which follows from the boundedness of the system for any finite energy . ] already from these examples it must be obvious that integrability is a rather rare spice , therefore that by far not all the systems are integrable . the full realization of this simple fact and its essential consequences came surprisingly late only in the last decade of the 19th century . it happened independently and almost simultaneously in the works of h.poincar ' e and a.lyapunov , who can undoubtedly be named the founders of chaos . poincar ' e s story , in particular , can be used as an exemplary illustration of the random ways in which science makes its progress @xcite . poincar ' e , who in the preceding years spent a lot of effort to solve the three body problem , submitted an account of his results to a scientific competition , organized in 1885 to celebrate the birthday anniversary of king oscar ii of sweden . his work won the competition , but an assistant of one of the famous mathematicians in the jury noticed some unclear points in the derivations . the thing was even much more complex than poincar ' e thought . in 1890 , he submitted a new version of his treatise , in which the mathematical notion of chaos defined in the sense of instability of motions was born . in one of the later writings poincar ' e explains : _ _ an example of this behavior is given in fig.[body3 ] . the new treatise was published at poincar ' e own expenses , exceeding the reward of the competition , which may serve as a warning to those who think that science must always be profitable . lyapunov came to similar conclusions ( concerning the instability of motions ) in 1892 in his doctoral thesis @xcite . the description of chaos remained for long a rather exotic domain of abstract mathematics . in integrable systems , the transformation to action - angle variables @xmath126 ensures that motions in the phase - space , described by hamilton equations @xmath127 and @xmath128 , are localized on manifolds , which are topologically equivalent to tori . these motions are therefore highly organized . poincar ' e himself developed a method how the tori can be visualized for systems with @xmath0 . the method is based on cutting the phase space by a planar section and marking passages of individual trajectories through the section today we call these pictures poincar maps . systems results from the requirement that each point of the planar section is crossed by a single trajectory . indeed , the point in the section is characterized by 2 variables ( usually a coordinate @xmath129 and the associated momentum @xmath130 ) , another variable is fixed by the section constraint ( often of the form @xmath131 ) , and the fourth variable ( e.g. , the momentum @xmath132 ) can for hamiltonian systems be computed from energy conservation . therefore , we have determined all 4 variables in the 4-dimensional phase space . for @xmath133 systems with no integrals of motions additional to @xmath112 the poincar ' e map would have to be more than 2-dimensional , which is rather impractical . ] but what happens when the integrability is destroyed ? certainly , some of the tori must die , but what is the exact scenario and an underlying mechanism ? plane in the phase space ; details of the hamiltonian can be found in ref.@xcite . the concentric curves correspond to deformed phase - space tori . all panels show examples of the poincar ' e - birkhoff fixed - point theorem . courtesy of m.macek . ] in 1912 , poincar ' e conjectured a theorem , in which he partly attacked this problem . the theorem was proven in 1913 and finalized in 1925 by g. birkhoff and became known as the poincar ' e - birkhoff fixed - point theorem . consider an @xmath0 torus characterized by a pair of frequencies @xmath134 with ratio @xmath135 . if @xmath136 is an irrational number , the trajectory never closes a loop the motion is only quasi - periodic . in contrast , if @xmath136 is rational , all trajectories on the given torus are periodic after @xmath137 crossings of the poincar ' e surface they return to the initial point . the theorem of poncar ' e and birkhoff is focused on such a rational tori , or more precisely , on the remnants of these tori after the destruction of integrability by a general perturbation . they showed that each periodic torus leaves an even number of fixed points in the poincar ' e map a half of these fixed points is stable ( elliptic ) , the other half is unstable ( hyperbolic ) . this was the first indication that the transition from the full regularity of an integrable system to a complete chaos of a strongly perturbed system is a highly non - trivial ( and usually rather fascinating ! ) process . figure [ ibmsec ] shows some examples of poncar ' e maps generated by the ibm hamiltonian with @xmath101 ( hence @xmath0 ) . alternating islands of elliptic and hyperbolic fixed points are clearly visible . several decades later , an essential and famous result related to the order - to - chaos transition in classical hamiltonian systems was formulated and proven by a.kolmogorov ( 1954 ) , v.arnold ( 1963 ) , and j.moser ( 1962 ) . it is nowadays known as the kam theorem @xcite . what does it tell us ? it attacks the problem of what exactly happens if an integrable system is subject to an increasingly strong non - integrable perturbation . which of the tori of the original system die , for a given strength of perturbation , and which survive in a deformed form ? it turned out that the rational tori , such as those considered above , disappear immediately , leaving only the above described remnants . on the other hand , some of the irrational tori are rather they may survive ( in a deformed form ) even rather strong perturbations . the clue for the torus to survive is that it must be . this superficial statement can be quantified by means of the number theory , through the convergence properties of rational approximations of the number @xmath136 ( the ratio of torus frequencies for an @xmath0 system ) . the tori characterized by irrational ratios @xmath136 ( slowly converging rational sequences ) are more resistant than the tori with ratios ( fast converging rational sequences ) . some people say that this law demonstrates the higher immunity of ugliness in the world , but sometimes even the most terrible irrational orbits look really pretty . ) with @xmath138 . value of @xmath75 is given in each column . the maps are constructed for energy @xmath139 of the potential local maximum at @xmath27 ( here , all sections are contracted to a single point with @xmath140 ) . the upper and lower rows show the @xmath141 and @xmath142 sections , respectively . each map visualizes 1000 intersections of 100 trajectories with the plane of the section . adopted from ref.@xcite . ] several examples of complex poncar ' e maps generated by the gcm vibrational hamiltonian ( [ hgcm ] ) are shown in fig.[gcmsec ] . particularly the maps in the middle column ( @xmath143 ) show numerous fine structures , which must be caused by rather sophisticated regular orbits . they appear in the system in spite of a large strength @xmath75 of the hamiltonian term violating the full integrability at @xmath113 . however , a surprising observation is that most of these orbits can not be identified with the survived tori from the @xmath113 system since the maps for lower values of @xmath75 ( c.f . , @xmath144 ) contain no trace of such orbits . one may perhaps think of a of the given hamiltonian to an unknown integrable hamiltonian beyond the parameter space of the gcm . note that also the @xmath145 maps contain some suspicious fine structures , whose origin can not be explained via the only known integrable regime of the model . nuclear vibrations even in their most simplistic description are highly nontrivial type of motion ! to classify the overall degree of chaos for transitional systems such as those exemplified in fig.[gcmsec ] , one needs to divide the whole phase space into the part filled with regular orbits , and the part filled with chaotic orbits . since each point of the phase space is crossed by a single trajectory , this division is unique , and one can introduce the degree of classical chaos through the following quantity , below shortened as the : @xmath146 \label{freg } \,.\ ] ] here , @xmath147 stands for the total of the fixed - energy hypersurface @xmath148 in the @xmath105-dimensional phase space , while @xmath149 is the occupied by regular orbits . the fraction @xmath150 is therefore a quantity between 0 ( for fully chaotic systems ) and 1 ( for completely regular systems ) . corresponding to the given orbits is shown in panel ( e ) , where we notice a clear difference between regular and chaotic cases . this is verified more systematically in panel ( d ) , which shows @xmath151 at three different times for 2000 orbits initiating along the line @xmath152 of section ( b ) . we observe that chaotic domains yield @xmath153 decreasing to negligible values , while in regular domains @xmath153 fluctuates around much higher values . adapted from ref.@xcite . ] it is clear that any numerical estimate of the regular fraction ( [ freg ] ) for a system between order and chaos must be imperfect . its precision depends primarily on the sampling density of the phase space by test trajectories . each of these trajectories is either regular ( stable ) or chaotic ( unstable ) , and the regular fraction can be directly approximated by the fraction @xmath154 . the convergence of this estimate to the exact value of @xmath150 is guaranteed ( assuming a uniform coverage of the phase space by initial points ) in the limit @xmath155 . however , a truly hard computational problem is how to unmistakably determine the stability or instability of each individual orbit . this requires to compute simultaneously the evolution of several orbits @xmath156 $ ] ( both @xmath29 and @xmath157 stand for @xmath102-dimensional vectors ) which initiate in a close vicinity of the given reference orbit @xmath158 $ ] . if the maximal lyapunov exponent for the deviation @xmath159 of these orbits is positive , the reference orbit is chaotic , if the lyapunov exponent is zero , the orbit is regular . is defined through the long - time phase - space distance @xmath160 between a given orbit and an arbitrary accompanying orbit : @xmath161 . this yields an exponential growth of the maximal distance for long times : @xmath162 . fof instance , the lyapunov exponent for the trajectory in fig.[ginst ] , determined however only from a finite time interval of the linear growth of @xmath163 ( where @xmath47 stands for the distance in the coordinate plane ) , is @xmath164 . ] applicability of this asymptotic - time criterion is however hindered in bounded systems , where the deviation of different orbits has an upper limit for any finite energy @xmath165 , yielding therefore all lyapunov exponents formally zero ( cf . the time dependence of the deviation of the vibrational orbits in fig.[ginst ] ) . several ways to bypass this computational problem has been proposed in the literature . one of these ways the one based on so - called alignment indices @xcite was used in our gcm and ibm calculations . the procedure resorts to evaluating only the relative phase - space deviations of trajectories instead of absolute ones : @xmath166 , where @xmath167 . the relative deviation is clearly a unity vector in the phase space , @xmath168 , and only the mutual orientation of two or more such vectors is meaningful . let us take a pair of randomly selected orbits , both of them accompanying the reference orbit @xmath169 , and calculate relative deviations @xmath170 and @xmath171 . if the reference orbit is unstable , the relative deviations tend to align in either parallel or antiparallel directions along the line of the maximal lyapunov exponent . this means that the smaller of the lengths @xmath172 ( this quantity is called and denoted below as @xmath153 ) converges to zero for long enough times . in contrast , for a stable reference orbit @xmath153 keeps oscillating within the definition interval @xmath173 $ ] . an illustration of the efficiency of this method in the gcm is presented in fig.[sali ] . for the gcm hamiltonian ( [ hgcm ] ) at @xmath139 as a function of control parameter @xmath74 and/or @xmath75 for @xmath174 . three computation methods are compared by distinct curves . the methods are distingished by initiating the trajectories on the @xmath141 or @xmath142 sections ( two curves denoted as @xmath150 ) , or in the whole phase space ( curve @xmath175 ) . the horizontal axis is split into two parts : the first with @xmath176 and @xmath177 $ ] ( the scale invariant parameter @xmath178 $ ] ) , the second with @xmath179 and @xmath180 $ ] ( hence @xmath181 $ ] ) . adopted from ref.@xcite . ] our procedure for calculating the regular fraction @xmath182 for a given gcm or ibm vibrational hamiltonian ( @xmath0 ) at fixed energy @xmath165 proceeds in the following steps : ( i ) we choose either the @xmath141 or @xmath142 section of the phase space and calculate the domain in this section that can be reached by trajectories with the given energy . ( ii ) we cover the accessible domain with tiny rectangular cells of the same area ; total number of these cells is @xmath183 . ( iii ) we perform a repeated computation in which an arbitrary point inside any cell of the accessible domain becomes an initial point of a calculated orbit ( note that all 4 canonical variables are fixed by selecting a point in the section and energy ) . the stability of this orbit is determined by the alignment index technique . if the orbit is stable , the initial cell as well as all the cells visited by the orbit during the evaluated time interval are counted and the resulting number is incremented to variable @xmath184 ( initially set to zero ) . it can happen that a single cell is visited by both regular and chaotic orbits ; in that case the value incremented to @xmath184 for this cell is the properly weighted average between 0 and 1 . ( iv ) the calculation is repeated until all cells of the accessible domain are either initial for a trajectory or are visited by at least one of these trajectories . ( v ) we estimate the regular fraction as @xmath185 . this method has an advantage of a systematic coverage of the phase space or more precisely , its 2d section with trajectories . on the other hand , it is clear that the resulting value of the regular fraction may depend on the phase - space section selected . the efficiency of our procedure and its inherent ambiguities in the gcm are illustrated by fig.[freg0 ] , where we compare the values of @xmath182 ( for @xmath139 and variable control parameter @xmath75 and/or @xmath74 ) calculated for both @xmath141 and @xmath142 sections , as well as by directly counting the stable and unstable orbits generated without reference to any phase - space section . it is seen that all three methods give approximately the same results . the differences between the three curves in fig.[freg0 ] can be declared to be an internal uncertainty of the method at the selected level of resolution ( number @xmath186 ) . figure [ freg0 ] , apart from its methodological aspect , has also a very interesting physical content . we see that for moderate values of parameter @xmath75 the regular fraction quickly drops from value @xmath187 at @xmath113 to @xmath188 at @xmath189 . in view of the kam scenario , this is a perfectly expectable behavior since @xmath75 weights the nonintegrable perturbation in the hamiltonian ( [ hgcm ] ) . however , at @xmath190 the regularity starts growing again ! in particular , in the subsequent region up to @xmath191 we observe a series of fine - structured peaks in the @xmath150 dependence . or @xmath192 is limited to energies @xmath193 and results from a specific shape of the potential . ] the increased regularity in this parameter domain is connected with rather complex poincar maps , such as those shown in the middle column of fig.[gcmsec ] . quite surprisingly , the peaks in fig.[freg0 ] follow a certain if expressed in scale invariant parameter @xmath194 ( the four local peaks appear at integer multiples of the value @xmath194 corresponding to the first peak ) . the origin of this behavior is still unknown . the complete dependence of @xmath150 on the gcm hamiltonian parameters and energy can be found in ref.@xcite . for gcm hamiltonians with extended kinetic term @xmath195 ( panel a ) and @xmath196 ( panel b ) , see eq.([halt ] ) . dependences for several values of parameter @xmath46 are given for both types of kinetic term . the other parameters are the same as in fig.[freg0 ] ( which corresponds to the @xmath197 case in both panels ) . adapted from ref.@xcite . ] in fig.[freg0ext ] , we show the regularity plots for generalized gcm hamiltonians with the kinetic energy terms according to eq.([halt ] ) . one can point out the opposite prevailing influence of type i and ii extensions of the kinetic energy on the regular fraction : while the type i extension with growing @xmath46 tends to reduce @xmath150 , the type ii extension seems to rather increase it . note that the influence of the rotational term ( [ trot ] ) on the regularity plot was analyzed in ref.@xcite . let us note that similar structures as in figs.[freg0 ] and [ freg0ext ] are observed also in the interacting boson model , where people often discuss about a so - called @xcite . it needs to be stressed that the general ibm hamiltonian is more sophisticated than the gcm one and therefore can not be characterized by a single scale invariant parameter such as @xmath194 . in particular , the common parameterization ( [ hibm ] ) yields two essential parameters , namely @xmath76 and the proportion between @xmath74 and @xmath75 , so that the peak series from fig.[freg0 ] becomes a kind of in the regularity landscape . the ridge follows an arc shape in the parameter plane and , as in the gcm , it is most pronounced for energies just above the @xmath27 local maximum of the potential . the physics behind both phenomena is probably rather similar . there is a fundamental problem to define chaos in quantum mechanics since linearity of the theory excludes any chance to introduce an exponential sensitivity to initial conditions . consider two normalized initial states @xmath198 and @xmath199 differing by @xmath200 with @xmath201 and @xmath202 , @xmath203 . the evolution of both states reads : @xmath204 where all scalar products remain conserved due to unitarity of the evolution operator . as a consequence , the squared distance of both states , @xmath205 , is independent of time . quantum hilbert space does not permit any kind of butterfly - wing effect . a different type of instability , the one which remains relevant even in the quantum domain , was pointed out by a.peres in 1984 @xcite . instead of the dependence on initial conditions he proposed to consider the dependence of quantum dynamics on details of the hamiltonian ( tiny changes of interaction parameters or small external perturbations ) . although the resulting concept of so - called plays an important role in many branches of quantum physics , including quantum information applications , it does not provide unfortunately!a selfsufficient definition of chaos in general quantum systems @xcite . according to present understanding , chaos is firmly anchored in classical physics . quantum physics can only explore a multitude of its distinct consequences ( signatures ) on the quantum level of description . quantum chaos in this sense is therefore not a , but rather a research field located somewhere in the highlands along the border between quantum and classical physics . m.berry , who undertook some pioneering expeditions to these wild territories , speaks about instead of quantum chaos @xcite . for bounded quantum systems those with discrete energy levels the most important signatures of chaos were identified in statistical properties of energy spectra . the relevant mathematics was created already in the 1950 s , long before the quest for quantum chaos started @xcite . it was when e.wigner looked for an achievable type of physical description related to long sequences of neutron resonances plentiful and rather complex excited states of compound atomic nuclei . wigner decided to give up the exact description prediction of the properties of all individual resonances and proposed to strictly separate smooth ( predictable ) and fluctuating ( statistical ) parts of the corresponding quantities . while the smoothened dependences ( averages , which reflect only sort of properties of the system ) can be described in terms of some reasonable simplifying models , the fluctuations ( that depend on all details of the dynamics ) represents just random , unpredictable component of the problem . in the 1980 s it became clear that quantum signatures of chaos lie right in these fluctuating properties @xcite . as an example , consider a discrete energy spectrum described by the state density @xmath206 . to predict the position of every individual level @xmath207 might be too hard ( or impossible especially if the system is as complex as a nucleus . however , one can perhaps estimate a smoothened density @xmath208 , where @xmath209 stands for a suitable smoothening function ( e.g. , the gaussian of width @xmath210 ) . indeed , the smoothed density is closely related to the size @xmath211 of the energy shell in the multidimensional phase space in units associated with the planck constant , which , in principle , can be evaluated with the aid of suitable techniques ( like the fermi gas approximation in the case of a nucleus ) . in contrast , the remaining component of the state density , its fluctuating part @xmath212 , depends on tiny details of the hamiltonian and can not be predicted by simple models . nevertheless , statistical features of @xmath212 reflect the degree of chaos in the classical limit of the system . to extract the chaos - related information , one usually performs a transformation of the spectrum called @xcite . it can be written in the following way : @xmath213 the unfolded sequence @xmath214 has a constant average density ( equal to one ) and therefore materializes statistical properties of the spectrum in the most explicit form . it turns out that mutual correlations between the members of this sequence show some universal behavior , which depends on whether the classical counterpart of the system is regular or chaotic . surprisingly , in regular ( integrable ) systems the unfolded sequences of energies with the same quantum numbers ( such as angular momentum or parity ) exhibit only weak or virtually no correlations , making the visual appearance of spectra rather disordered . in contrast , chaotic systems yield strong correlations and produce seemingly more regular spectra . ( classical regular fraction ) , @xmath93 ( the brody parameter adjunct ) , and @xmath215 ( a shifted exponent of the power spectrum ) for the gcm . panels ( a ) and ( b ) show results for @xmath216 and for @xmath217 , respectively . the mass parameter was chosen such that the displayed energy intervals contain 30 ( panel a ) and 40 ( panel b ) thousand of quantum levels , calculated with the 2d quantization option ( see the text ) . panels ( c ) and ( d ) show separately @xmath93 and @xmath215 for all three different quantization schemes ( the hamiltonian parameters are the same as in the respective left panel ) . we conclude that within the error bars ( given by the fitting methods of the respective quantities in finite samples of levels in a vicinity each energy)the correlation measures show no dependence on the quantization . ] the correlations in unfolded spectra of chaotic systems are of both short- and long - range types . the short range correlations are usually expressed through the statistical distribution of nearest neighbor spacing @xmath218 constructed for sequences of levels with the same quantum numbers . this distribution reveals whether the system exhibits the so - called , a phenomenon indicating the absence of additional integrals of motions . we use the following formulae @xcite : @xmath219 where the brody form with @xmath220 interpolates between the limiting cases @xmath221 ( poisson ) and @xmath222 ( wigner ) . note that the symbol @xmath223 stands for the normalization factor and @xmath224 for a coefficient ensuring that @xmath225 . the poissonian distribution , which describes an uncorrelated spectrum , is typical for integrable systems . it implies the absence of level repulsion ( since @xmath226 for @xmath227 ) , which is related to the existence of additional integrals of motions that eliminate the corresponding offdiagonal matrix elements of the hamiltonian . the wigner formula includes the level repulsion given by @xmath228 for small spacings and captures properties of chaotic systems ( with generally nonvanishing offdiagonal hamiltonian matrix elements ) . ) is only an approximation of the distribution predicted by the random matrix theory . it applies in system symmetric under the time reversal . for other systems , the formula is modified to include even stronger ( @xmath229 ) level repulsion @xcite . ] system in between order and chaos are characterized by a transitional brody form with the parameter @xmath94 somehow related to the overall degree of chaos . to be more specific , we expect a correlation ( generally nonlinear ) between values @xmath230 . associated with the gcm unfolded energy spectrum at a single energy @xmath165 . model parameters : @xmath231 , @xmath232 . panel ( a ) displays the number @xmath137 of levels in the energy interval @xmath233 corresponding to the shortest periodic orbit ( period @xmath234 ) as a function of energy @xmath165 . the value @xmath235 sets the minimal frequency @xmath236 for the evaluation of the power spectrum . panel ( b ) shows in the log - log scale the power spectrum @xmath237 for a sample of 2048 levels in a vicinity of the energy indicated in panel ( a ) by the vertical line . the slope of the cloud of points in the above @xmath238 ( vertical line in panel b ) yields the exponent in the @xmath239 dependence . the power spectrum is determined by two different methods : ( i ) by considering all 2048 levels ( black dots ) and ( ii ) by grouping the levels into 32 bunches of 64 levels and calculating an average power spectrum over the bunches ( green dots ) . the corresponding fits of the slope , indicated by the full ( i ) and dashed ( ii ) tilted lines , yield values @xmath240 and @xmath241 . note that in fig.[qchagcm ] we used the method ( ii ) . ] long range correlations in spectra of chaotic systems are also very strong . they can be expressed in different ways , for instance via the variance of the number of unfolded levels in an interval of length @xmath242 , or equivalently via a so - called @xmath243 statistics @xcite . an alternative approach @xcite is based on the fourier analysis of a sequence of statistical quantities @xmath244 . the sequence apparently satisfies @xmath245 , expressing fluctuations of the cumulative number @xmath246 of unfolded levels around the straight line @xmath247 . the fourier transformed sequence reads as @xmath248 $ ] , with @xmath40 being the number of levels included into the analysis , and yields a power spectrum @xmath249 . the power spectrum contains information on the frequencies @xmath102 present in the @xmath250 ( number @xmath137 being identified with a discrete time ) and represents a statistical quantity associated with @xmath250 . it turns out that the average of the power spectrum can be well approximated by the formula @xmath239 , where @xmath251 for strongly correlated spectra of chaotic systems , and @xmath252 for the uncorrelated poissonian spectra of regular systems @xcite . hence we establish a link @xmath253 . statistical properties of spectra were extensively studied for both the geometric collective model and the interacting boson model @xcite . figure [ qchagcm ] shows some of the gcm results , namely a comparison of classical regular fraction with the corresponding measures of short - range and long - range spectral correlations for two choices of the hamiltonian parameters . a clear correspondence between @xmath150 and the dependences of @xmath254 and @xmath255 is observed , which confirms the above given statement concerning the link between chaos , on the classical level , and statistical properties of spectra , on the quantum level . this , as some authors call it , has been already tested in numerous systems , but mostly in the regime of a weak energy dependence of the regular fraction @xcite . in particular , the most influential analyses have been performed with 2d billiard systems , which show a constant value of @xmath150 , totally independent of @xmath165 . here we verify the bohigas conjecture in a more complex form ( though still based on a 2d model ) , demonstrating that even rapid changes of the classical regularity are closely followed by both short- and long - range quantum correlation measures . moreover , the comparison is performed for different quantization schemes and shows that the correlation properties are quantization - independent . these properties must therefore reflect only the features related to the classical limit of the system , in agreement with the bohigas conjecture . we want to emphasize that the rapid variability of the gcm regular fraction with energy not only creates a desirable framework for testing the quantum chaos assumptions , but also represents a considerable computational challenge ! the statistical analysis of the spectrum can only be performed piece by piece on samples of levels situated in a close vicinity of energy @xmath165 , where @xmath165 varies along the whole spectrum . on the one hand , the samples have to be sufficiently large to allow for a reliable statistical evaluation , on the other hand , the energy interval @xmath95 spanned by each sample needs to be sufficiently narrow with respect to the scale that determines local variations of @xmath182 . as an example , we illustrate in fig.[onef ] the fourier analysis of a single sample of levels around one particular energy @xmath165 , outlining the procedures capable to determine the local power - spectrum exponent @xmath256 . in the rest of this section we describe an interesting visual approach to quantum chaos , which will complement the cute poincar ' e maps presented above in connection with classical chaos . the method was proposed by a.peres @xcite ( also in 1984 , which seems to be _ annus mirabilis _ for quantum chaos ) and its practical application is limited to systems with two degrees of freedom . it is based on the fact that the time average @xmath257 of an arbitrary quantity @xmath258 represents an automatic integral of motion , regardless of any specific dynamical properties of the system . classically , the average is defined through infinite - time integration over the whole classical orbit , and therefore assigns a unique value @xmath259 to any point of the phase space ( the same value is assigned to all points visited by a single trajectory ) . the integrals of motions @xmath257 do not generally satisfy the conditions for integrability ( any system has an infinite number of such integrals ) , but , as shown below , they provide a valuable analyzing tool for systems between order and chaos . ) with @xmath260 [ the o(6 ) dynamical symmetry limit ] for @xmath261 bosons . symbol @xmath194 stands for the o(5 ) seniority , while the other symbols denote casimir invariants of the su(3 ) and u(5 ) algebras , which are involved in the overall u(6 ) dynamical algebra of the ibm . the lower row shows the lattices @xmath262 of mean values of the respective quantities @xmath258 , while the upper row shows the corresponding lattices of the variances @xmath263 . courtesy of m. macek . ] in the 5d quantization with @xmath264 ( upper rows ) and @xmath265 ( lower rows ) . parameters @xmath74 and @xmath75 of the potential are indicated above the panels , @xmath174 , and @xmath266 . ] in the quantum case , the time average is defined by the following formula : @xmath267\,\hat{p}\,\exp[-\tfrac{i}{\hbar}\hat{h}t ] \,,\qquad [ \hat{\bar{p}},\hat{h}]=0 \label{per } \,,\ ] ] where @xmath268 is an operator corresponding to the original observable . it is easy to verify that the commutator of the time - average operator @xmath269 with the hamiltonian @xmath87 vanishes in the @xmath270 limit , irrespective of the concrete choice of @xmath268 . quantum expectation values of both observables @xmath268 and @xmath269 are the same for the energy eigenstates of the system , @xmath271 , and it is therefore rather straightforward to create a 2d picture in which the discrete energies @xmath272 are plotted against the corresponding expectation values @xmath273 . for the resulting lattice of points we use the term . it can be constructed for any observable @xmath268 . peres lattices for systems with @xmath0 can be seen as quantum counterparts of the classical poincar ' e maps . it turns out that geometric regularity ( irregularity ) of the lattice signals regular ( chaotic ) dynamics of the system on the classical level . in particular , if the system is classically integrable , any integral of motion must be a function ( suppose a function ) of the canonical actions , hence @xmath274 and @xmath275 . in transition to the quantum regime , @xmath276 and @xmath277 become approximate multiples of the planck action and form a rectangular grid in the @xmath278 plane . as the peres lattice in the @xmath279 plane is related to this @xmath278 grid by a sooth mapping , it will certainly be somehow distorted , but one expects that it will still look orderly . for non - integrable systems , on the other hand , there is no reason for the peres lattice to be regular . for given energy @xmath165 tend to be contracted to a single value due to ergodicity of the system . ] in this case , any partial arrangement of the lattice is a signature of fractional regularity of the dynamics . it should be noted that various peres lattices can in general be combined with each other or smoothly transformed without affecting regularity or chaoticity of the patterns present in the lattice . for instance , the lattice of @xmath272 versus @xmath263 , which displays the variance of the quantity @xmath258 in the hamiltonian eigenstates , is just a combination of lattices for @xmath280 and @xmath258 . some examples of peres lattices for the above ibm and gcm hamiltonians are given in figs.[peribm ] and [ pergcm ] . the first of them , fig.[peribm ] , shows several incompatible lattices calculated for an integrable ibm hamiltonian with the o(6 ) dynamical symmetry . the o(5 ) seniority , cf . eq.([senior ] ) , whose average and variance lattices are drawn in the first column , represents a conserved quantity for any ibm hamiltonian ( [ hibm ] ) with @xmath114 , as can be directly verified through the null variance of the seniority in all hamiltonian eigenstates . the other quantities are not integrals of motions , they nevertheless generate perfectly regular lattices in both average values and dispersions . this is in agreement with integrability of the hamiltonian employed . figure [ pergcm ] depicts several peres lattices for the gcm , using eigenstates with @xmath101 in the 5d quantization . the lattices were constructed using only the average values of the respective peres operator , the corresponding variances are not given this time . two choices of the peres operator are presented : the first one is the @xmath101 seniority @xmath281 , which expresses an operator @xmath282 in the plane @xmath283 of the deformation coordinates ( in the 5d quantization ) . the corresponding averages are denoted as @xmath284 and their lattices are shown in the first row of each panel . the second choice of the peres operator coincides with the cubic term of the gcm potential , @xmath265 , which represents the nonintegrable perturbation of the @xmath113 integrable hamiltonian . the averages , denoted @xmath285 , are seen in the second row of each panel . peres lattices in fig.[pergcm ] are given for several points in the parameter plane @xmath286 , following a path which crosses all inequivalent gcm potentials differing by the scale invariant parameter @xmath194 . at first , we fix @xmath176 and change @xmath287 , visualizing the onset of chaotic vibrations in deformed nuclei and their partial regularization at larger values of @xmath75 . next we keep @xmath179 and change @xmath288 . in this way , we make a transition between two qualitatively different types of the potential the one corresponding to deformed equilibrium shapes of the nucleus and the one associated with spherical nuclei ( the @xmath289 potentials have three degenerate minima at @xmath290 , while those with @xmath74 above a certain critical value @xmath291 have just a single global minimum at @xmath292 ) . and @xmath290 minima of the potential become degenerate and swap is at @xmath293 . ] finally , we fix @xmath294 and decrease @xmath295 , coming back to the integrable regime , but on the spherical side of the parameter plane . the most chaotic lattices are the ones in panels ( c ) and ( e ) . the first corresponds to @xmath296 , which coincides with the first minimum of @xmath150 at @xmath139 in fig.[freg0 ] . both peres lattices in this panel can be compared with the energy dependences of @xmath182 and with the other measures of chaos shown in panels ( a ) and ( c ) of fig.[qchagcm ] . we may notice that the regions with increased regularity in fig.[qchagcm ] correspond to the occurrence of regular parts of the lattice in fig.[pergcm](c ) . the chaotic lattice in panel ( e ) corresponds to @xmath297 , which is a point situated near the between spherical and deformed shapes . many other examples of peres lattices and their detailed comparison with the dependence @xmath182 can be found in refs.@xcite and @xcite . from the examples shown here and in the literature it can be inferred that peres lattices significantly complement the standard methods used to investigate chaotic properties of quantum systems . in fact , they even enable one to go beyond the standard methods . this is so because quantum states can be _ individually assigned _ to distinctly regular or distinctly chaotic parts of the lattice , which is in contrast to the statistical approach that can only attribute some averaged regular / chaotic attributes to sufficiently large ensembles of states . constructing a suitable peres lattice for a given quantum system with known spectral correlations is therefore similar to analyzing the classical dynamics with a given @xmath150 by means of poincar ' e sections . two remarks on the applicability of the method are in order : first , to unambiguously deduce whether a given state is in a regular or chaotic domain of the spectrum , it is usually useful to construct peres lattices for several operators . a comparison of several lattices helps particularly in situations when an overlap of two or more regular parts in a single lattice produces a seemingly chaotic mesh . second , the method in the above - presented form is applicable only in systems with @xmath0 . consider , for example , an integrable system with @xmath298 . to ensure a one - to - one mapping from the space of canonical actions @xmath299 , one would have to consider a @xmath300-dimensional lattice ( @xmath102-dimensional in general ) . this is , however , rather difficult with only 2d physical literature being available . these unalterable limitations of us , poor 3d creatures , will probably always hinder our understanding of higher than 2d systems . we are arriving to the end of our short tour . its purpose was to show some known concepts of chaos theory by means of simple models taken from the nuclear context . was the marriage of chaos with nuclei successful ? we believe it was . we think that the models like those used here provide an excellent environment for general investigations of chaos in both classical and quantum incarnations environment , which is sufficiently complex to embrace diverse nontrivial phenomena , but at the same time simple enough to allow an intelligible description . in analogy with the billiard models , that have been extensively used for such investigations in the past decades , the nuclear models can be used as models with two degrees of freedom . in contrast to the billiard models , however , they exhibit very rich dependence of chaos measures on both energy and hamiltonian parameters , which opens some new directions of potential research . * geometrical chaos : attempts have been made to develop techniques that would be able to _ predict _ an approximate value of the regular fraction @xmath150 for an arbitrary choice of the system s parameters and energy . an interesting approach is based on the geometrical method , which reduces the dynamics of the system to free motions of particles in curved space @xcite . a related technique resorts to evaluating the convexity / concavity of the energy contours of the model potential @xcite . it can be shown that in the gcm ( and/or ibm ) the geometrical method is only partially successful @xcite . pre - estimation of the degree of chaos in a given system therefore remains one of the major tasks of chaos theory . * chaos versus symmetry : people keep trying to establish a link of order and chaos with some generalized concepts of symmetry . if such a link exists and is universal , it would interpret partial regularity , as observed in various systems of nature , through some imperfect , fractional dynamical symmetries possessed by these systems . this led to the ideas of so - called partial dynamical symmetry @xcite and quasi dynamical symmetry @xcite . although both gcm and ibm are particularly well suited for this kind of research @xcite , its success in connection with chaos is so far only partial . * implications of chaos : one can step from origins to consequences of chaos , investigating various chaos - assisted phenomena in specific systems . for example , the coexistence of regular and chaotic modes of dynamics turned out to be relevant for transitions between spherical and deformed shapes of nuclei @xcite . regular dynamics was also shown to play a remarkable role in the emergence of rotational bands in highly excited nuclei @xcite , which suggests that the physics underlying the general phenomenon of adiabatic separation of intrinsic and collective motions in many - body systems might be closely related to chaos theory . m. gutzwiller , _ chaos in classical and quantum mechanics _ , springer , new york , 1990 . weidenmller and g.e . mitchell , _ rev . phys . _ * 81 * , 539 ( 2009 ) . mitchell , a. richter , and h.a . weidenmller , _ rev . phys . _ * 82 * , 2845 ( 2010 ) . rowe and j.l . wood , _ fundamentals of nuclear models . foundational models _ , world scientific , singapore , 2010 . p. cejnar , p. str ' ansk ' y , and m. macek , _ nuclear physics news _ * 21 * , 22 ( 2011 ) . m. h ' enon and c. heiles , _ astron . j. _ * 69 * , 73 ( 1964 ) . p. cejnar and p. str ' ansk ' y , _ phys . lett . _ * 93 * , 102502 ( 2004 ) . p. str ' ansk ' y , _ ph.d . thesis _ , charles university , prague , 2009 . p. str ' ansk ' y , m. kurian , and p. cejnar , _ phys . _ c * 74 * , 014306 ( 2006 ) . e. chacn , m. moshinsky , and r.t . * 17 * , 668 ( 1976 ) . e. chac ' on and m. moshinsky , _ j. math . phys . _ * 18 * , 870 ( 1977 ) . str ' ansk ' y , p. hruka , and p. cejnar , _ phys . _ e * 79 * , 04620 ( 2009 ) . str ' ansk ' y , p. hruka , and p. cejnar , _ phys . _ e * 79 * , 066201 ( 2009 ) . f. iachello and a. arima , _ the interacting boson model _ , cambridge university press , cambridge , 1987 . r. l. hatch and s. levit , _ phys . _ c * 25 * , 614 ( 1982 ) . m. macek , p. str ' ansk ' y , p. cejnar , s. heinze , j. jolie , and j. dobe , _ phys . _ c * 75 * , 064318 ( 2007 ) . arnold , _ mathematical methods of classical mechanics _ , springer , new york , 1989 . j. barrow - green , _ poincar ' e and the three body problem _ ( history of mathematics , v. 11 ) , am . a.m. lyapunov , _ the general problem of the stability of motion _ , taylor & francis , london , 1992 . m. macek and a. leviatan , _ nuclear structure and dynamics 12 _ , ed . r. bijker , _ aip conf . proc . _ * 1488 * , 441 ( 2012 ) . skokos , _ j. phys . _ a * 34 * , 10029 ( 2001 ) skokos , ch . antonopoulos , t.c . bountis , and m.v . vrahatis , _ j. phys . _ a * 37 * , 6269 ( 2004 ) . y. alhassid and n. whelan , _ phys _ * 67 * , 816 ( 1991 ) . n. whelan and y. alhassid , _ nucl . phys . _ a * 556 * , 42 ( 1993 ) . a. peres , _ phys _ a * 30 * , 1610 ( 1984 ) . t. gorin , t. prosen , t.h . seligman , and m. nidari , _ phys . _ * 435 * , 33 ( 2006 ) . m. berry , _ physica scripta _ * 40 * , 335 ( 1989 ) . c.e . porter ( ed . ) , _ statistical theories of spectra : fluctuations _ , academic press , new york , 1965 . o. bohigas , m.j . giannoni , and c. schmit , _ phys . _ * 52 * , 1 ( 1984 ) . t. guhr , a. mller - groeling , and h.a . weidenmller , _ phys . rep . _ * 299 * , 189 ( 1998 ) . a. rela~ no , j.m.g . g ' omez , r. a. molina , j. retamosa , and e. faleiro , _ phys . _ * 89 * , 244102 ( 2002 ) . a. peres , _ phys _ * 53 * , 1711 ( 1984 ) . l. horwitz , y.b . zion , m. lewkowitz , m. schiffer , and j. levitan , _ phys . lett . _ * 98 * , 234301 ( 2007 ) . str ' ansk ' y _ et al . _ , to be published . a. leviatan , _ prog . phys . _ * 66 * , 93 ( 2011 ) . rowe , p. rochford , and j. repka , _ j. math . _ * 29 * , 572 ( 1988 ) . m. macek , j. dobe , and p. cejnar , _ phys . _ c * 80 * , 014319 ( 2009 ) . m. macek , j. dobe , and p. cejnar , _ phys . _ c * 82 * , 014308 ( 2010 ) . berezovoj , yu.l . bolotin , and v.a . cherkaskiy , _ phys . lett . _ a * 323 * , 218 ( 2004 ) . a. leviatan and m. macek , _ phys . _ b * 714 * , 110 ( 2012 ) . m. macek , j. dobe , p. str ' ansk ' y , and p. cejnar , _ phys . * 105 * , 072503 ( 2010 ) . Abstract:
[ "we use two models of nuclear collective dynamics the geometric collective model and the interacting boson model to illustrate principles of classical and quantum chaos . we propose these models as a suitable testing ground for further elaborations of the general theory of chaos in both classical and quantum domains . address = institute of particle and nuclear physics , faculty of mathematics and physics , charles university , + v holeovikch 2 , 18000 prague , czech republic address = instituto de ciencias nucleares , universidad nacional autnoma de mxico , 04510 , mxico , d.f . ," ]
12,655
12,655
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: nanoparticle arrays@xcite are a perfect system to analyze correlated electronic transport and have received a lot of experimental and theoretical attention during the last decade@xcite . in spite of this , their properties and i - v characteristics are not well understood . the presence of disorder in these arrays complicates the analysis@xcite . the two most relevant and experimentally unavoidable types of disorder are charging disorder due to random charges quenched at the substrate and resistance disorder due to small changes in the distance between the nanoparticles and the exponential dependence of the resistance on the distance . voids in the lattice or a non - homogeneous distribution of nanoparticle size can be also present@xcite but this source of disorder is less important in some recent experiments . theoretical analysis have mainly considered arrays in which each nanoparticle is capacitively coupled only to its nearest neighbors@xcite , especially the case in which this coupling is small . the truncation of capacitive coupling to nearest neighbor results in an interaction between charges in different conductors which decays exponentially with the distance between them@xcite . this limit is relevant for those arrays coupled to a gate electrode@xcite , as the mobile charges in this lead effectively screen coulomb interactions . a complete description of the non - equilibrium transport through arrays has been presented only very recently@xcite and is restricted to one - dimensional metallic nanoparticle arrays in which interactions are finite only when charges are placed on the same conductor . self - assembled arrays fabricated nowadays are deposited onto insulating substrates and generally lack a gate voltage . in these arrays , the screening of long - range interactions is less effective , but the proximity of other conductors , both islands and leads , modifies its value compared to a @xmath0 coulomb law@xcite . the electrodes contribute to the screening of the interaction . theoretical analysis including the effect of long - range interactions are scarce and limited@xcite to numerical results or particular cases . in this paper we perform a detailed analysis of the effect of the long - range character of the interaction on the transport properties through ordered and disordered one - dimensional arrays . we consider the influence of charging and resistance disorder . the interactions are described by an inverse capacitance matrix , in which coupling to other conductors is not truncated . the matrix is calculated including the effect of screening and the current is computed numerically . some analytical approximations are also discussed and compared with the numerical results . this comparison allows us to understand the origin of the behavior found . to analyze the transport we put forward a model to describe the electrostatic interactions among the charges occupying the islands and the electrodes , which allows for a clear description of the relevant contributions to the transport . in particular , we introduce the concept of polarization potential drop at the junctions between the nanoparticles . as in our previous study of the short - range case@xcite , we analyze the threshold voltage , flow of current and voltage drop for the cases with and without charge or junction resistance disorder . the organization of the paper is as follows . section ii describes the system under study and the model used to analyze the transport properties and compares it with previous models used in the literature . in section iii we discuss the correlations introduced by the long - range character of the interaction in the disorder potential . section iv , v and vi respectively analyze the threshold voltage , i - v characteristics and voltage drop through the array . in section vii we summarize our results . finally , in appendix i we describe the two methods employed to calculate the screened interaction between charges , and in appendix ii we discuss the effect of screening on the distance - dependence of this interaction . we consider an array composed of @xmath1 metallic spheres of radius @xmath2 and center to center distance @xmath3 . throughout lengths are measured in units of @xmath2 and energies in units of the charging energy of an isolated nanoparticle @xmath4 , with @xmath5 the nanoparticle capacitance when it is isolated . here and in the following the electronic charge @xmath6 . as @xmath7 decreases , the charges in an island feel more the effects of charges in other islands . in this sense we say that decreasing the spacing @xmath7 increases the range of interactions . experimentally arrays in which the metallic nanoparticles are capped with thiols have @xmath8 . arrays self - assembled via other types of molecules , like dna , allow for the investigation of larger @xmath7 values . we model each nanoparticle with a continuum level spectrum . the tunneling barriers which separate them have a resistance much larger than the quantum of resistance and we treat the transport at the sequential tunneling level@xcite . to analyze the transport the array is sandwiched between two large electrodes . we assume that the electrodes are not ideal voltage sources , but have finite self - capacitances . the potential on the leads will thus fluctuate in response to all tunneling events , even those that do not directly involve the electrodes . for a more extensive discussion of these assumptions see@xcite the energy of the system is given by @xmath9 labels @xmath10 and @xmath11 refer to source and drain electrodes and @xmath12 to the islands . latin capital and lower case letters are used to denote electrodes and islands respectively . greek indexes will be used when the labels refer to both islands and electrodes . @xmath13 is a random potential at each island , present in charge disordered arrays , and zero in the clean case . charges @xmath14 and @xmath15 maintain source and drain electrodes at potentials @xmath16 and @xmath17 , respectively . the electrostatic interactions in our system are defined through an inverse capacitance matrix @xmath18 that directly includes all the conductors in our system . all the elements @xmath19 are positive . the inverse capacitance matrix is symmetric , @xmath20 , and has dimension @xmath21 , i.e. it includes the electrodes . we have developed two numerical methods to calculate the interaction potential ( inverse capacitance matrix ) of an array of spheres . these methods are explained in appendix i. the properties of this interaction , how it compares to previous calculations for the case of cubic , cylindrical ( with array and island axis collinear ) and disk shaped islands ( with array and island axis perpendicular ) and the screening effect of the electrodes are discussed in appendix ii . for simplicity we have considered two large spherical leads . the coupling between the islands and the electrodes is included through @xmath22 and @xmath23 . the current is computed numerically by means of a monte carlo simulation , described in@xcite . it is controlled by the probability of a tunneling process , given by @xmath24 here @xmath25 is the resistance of the junction through which tunneling takes place and @xmath26 is the difference between the energy of the system before and after the tunneling event . in the following we restrict the discussion to zero temperature . then @xmath27 . it is finite only when @xmath26 is negative . after a bit of algebra , the change in energy due to a tunneling event from @xmath28 to @xmath29 can be rewritten as @xmath30 here , the excitonic energy @xmath31 necessary to create an electron - hole pair in an uncharged array is given by @xmath32 the second term in ( [ change ] ) can be seen as the potential difference between the sites involved in the tunneling . at the electrodes @xmath33 and @xmath34 , where @xmath35 is the bias potential and we have introduced the bias asymmetry parameter @xmath28 as in ref.@xcite . both @xmath36 , also denoted as symmetric bias , and @xmath37 have been used in the literature . @xmath28 characterizes how the bias voltage is partitioned between source and drain chemical potential shifts . since no physical properties depend on the overall zero of energy , varying @xmath28 in our model is entirely equivalent to rigidly shifting all impurity potentials by @xmath38 . since in our model all transport occurs by transfer between adjacent nanoparticles , the evolution of a nanoparticle array as the bias voltage is applied is sensitive to @xmath28 , and we believe that the dependence on @xmath28 could in principle be observable , see discussion in @xcite . at the islands the potential can be decomposed into three terms @xmath39 , the disorder potential @xmath13 due to random charges in the substrate , the polarization potential @xmath40 at the island induced by the electrodes at finite bias and the potential due to the charges in the nanoparticles @xmath41 . here @xmath42 with @xmath43 { \ ; \mbox{.}}\label{lambda2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath44 the charging potential @xmath45 with @xmath46 { \ ; \mbox{.}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath47 can be interpreted as a modification of the interaction between the charges in the islands due to the proximity of the electrodes at a fixed potential . for the case @xmath48 in which both charges are on the same island this modification was already discussed in@xcite , as the interaction of a soliton with a passive edge . expression ( [ ctilde ] ) shows that not only when the charges are in the same island , but also when they occupy different islands , their effective interactions are modified by the presence of the voltage - biased leads . two types of terms can be differentiated in the modification of this interaction . the last two terms in ( [ ctilde ] ) or direct terms , can be viewed as the interaction between a charge in island @xmath49 and the image charge at one of the electrodes induced by the charge in island @xmath50 . this term is affected by the presence of the other electrode . on the other hand , the terms containing @xmath51 , or indirect terms , reflect the interaction between the image charges in both electrodes . direct and indirect terms have opposite sign . the direct term reduces the effective interaction ; the indirect one increases it . we emphasize that ( [ change ] ) to ( [ ctilde ] ) follow from ( [ freecharge ] ) after straightforward and trivial algebra . we have just defined a few quantities and split the change in energy @xmath26 and potential @xmath52 in several terms to facilitate the physical interpretation of the transport properties . we can also define the potential drop at each junction @xmath53 with the corresponding disorder , polarization and charging terms @xmath54 , @xmath55 , and @xmath56 . label @xmath49 for a junction runs from @xmath57 to @xmath11 and refers to the one between conductors @xmath58 and @xmath49 . the polarization potential drop at each junction , @xmath59 does not depend on the resistance of the junctions , but on the electrostatic interactions of each island with the voltage - biased leads . here @xmath60 and @xmath61 . a linear drop of the polarization potential implies @xmath62 , requires @xmath63 for all junctions and independence on @xmath28 . from ( [ lambda2 ] ) we see that a priori @xmath64 depends both on the geometry of the electrodes and the array and on how this is biased . it depends on how the charges in the islands and the electrodes interact . for most capacitance matrices , in particular for the capacitance matrices discussed here , the polarization potential is not linear in the island label @xmath49 and the potential drops are larger close to the biasing leads . in the onsite case , discussed in ref.@xcite @xmath65 is finite only at junctions @xmath57 and @xmath11 and given by @xmath66 and @xmath67 . in general , as the range of the interactions between charges increases , @xmath68 is more homogeneous in previous models@xcite @xmath18 had dimension @xmath69 and the inverse self - capacitances of the electrodes , @xmath70 and @xmath71 , and the inverse mutual capacitances between them , @xmath72 , were neglected . in our model @xmath73 are small quantities whose values will not significatively affect the quantitative results . these other models do not include the indirect term in ( [ ctilde ] ) either . on the other hand , an expression analogous to ( [ phipol ] ) can be defined in other models . for example , in the model previously discussed by middleton and wingreen@xcite , with an @xmath69 capacitance matrix , the interaction between an island and an electrode is given by the interaction of the charge of the island with charges induced by the electrode in the islands immediately adjacent to the electrode . this interaction results in a polarization potential characterized by @xmath74 here @xmath75 is the capacitance between the source or drain electrode and an adjacent island . in this model , except in the extreme long - range case , see below , the polarization potential does not decay linearly with distance and depends on the asymmetry of the bias potential . other models , however , impose a uniform polarization drop through the array @xcite as discussed in@xcite and section vi , even if the polarization potential does not drop linearly and is independent on the junction resistance , the average total potential drop depends on the resistance ( via the average charge occupation of the islands ) and for homogeneous resistances a linear drop is partially recovered at large bias voltages . whenever not specified we assume that all the junction resistances @xmath76 are equal and given by @xmath77 . the effect of non homogeneous resistances will be studied in two ways . in the first case , one of the junction resistances at a given position is larger than the other ones ( given by @xmath77 ) . in the second case the value of the resistances , varying in between two values is randomly assigned to the junctions . to mimic that disorder in resistances originates in variations in distances between the islands and the exponential dependence of the junction resistance in the distance between islands the junction resistance is given by @xmath78 with @xmath79 and @xmath80 input parameters and @xmath81 . here @xmath82 is a random number between @xmath10 and @xmath57 . in the paper , we have used @xmath83 and @xmath84 . with these values the resistance changes respectively between ( 5 - 11)@xmath77 , ( 8 - 21)@xmath77 and ( 23 - 83)@xmath77 . charged impurities trapped in the substrate underlying the nanoparticle array create random potentials at the nanoparticles . in molecularly assembled arrays , charge transfer to the organic molecules surrounding the nanoparticles results in non - integer random charges at the islands@xcite . charging disorder is included in our model through a random potential at each island @xmath85 . in principle , @xmath85 take values larger than the charging energy @xmath86 . however , for large values of the disorder potential , charges flow to compensate for these large fluctuations . in this section we analyze the effect of the long - range interaction on the final distribution of disorder potential as compared to the case with onsite interactions . we find that the distribution of probabilities @xmath87 and @xmath88 are modified . the maximum and minimum values of @xmath89 and @xmath90 are modified compared to the short range case and given by @xmath91 and @xmath92 . correlations between the disorder potentials of neighboring islands are introduced . if interactions between the charges are short - range , ( @xmath93 ) , the set of disorder potentials @xmath94 , once the screening of the potential due to the mobile charges is taken into account , is uniformly distributed in the interval @xmath95 . the probability associated with each pair , @xmath96 , is a constant , see fig . 1 and the distribution of the probabilities of the potential drops due to disorder across the array junctions , @xmath97 , has the form@xcite @xmath98 and @xmath99 . in the presence of long - range interactions , the charges which flow to compensate the large fluctuations of the disorder potential , influence the value of the total potential at neighboring islands . as a consequence , the screened disorder is correlated@xcite . the probability of each pair @xmath96 is no longer a constant . @xmath88 depends on the inverse capacitance matrix @xmath18 . in order to analyze these correlations and obtain the proper disorder potential distribution we assign the potentials by first randomly assigning potentials to the islands @xmath100 , in the interval @xmath101 with @xmath102 larger than the charging energy . we then find the equilibrium configuration of charges @xmath103 that occupy the array with island disorder potentials @xmath104 and grounded leads ( @xmath105 ) and redefine the potentials at each site using the expression @xmath106 the effect of the screening charges @xmath103 is included in the redefined potentials @xmath94 so we then reset the number of charges at each site to zero to avoid doublecounting the charge when we calculate the total electrostatic energy of our system . following the redefinition of the disorder potentials , we find that on average the distribution of the disorder potentials @xmath94 and the disorder potential drops @xmath107 between adjacent islands are independent of @xmath102 . the values of @xmath94 and @xmath107 are bound by @xmath91 and @xmath108 respectively , as the total energy of the system is at a global minimum when the original disorder configuration @xmath104 is screened out by the charges @xmath103 . when in this state , adding an additional charge to any island in the array increases the energy of the system . the energy of adding an additional charge to an island from a large electrode outside the system with neglible self inverse capacitance is given by @xmath109 where the top ( bottom ) sign refers to the change in energy of the system as a result of adding a positive ( negative ) charge to island @xmath49 . since @xmath110 when the array is in equilibrium , the disorder potential values must lie between @xmath111 . the magnitude of this quantity equals @xmath86 in the onsite limit and decreases as the strength and range of the coulomb interactions increases , see appendix ii . additionally when the array is in equilibrium state , the energy to hop between all pairs of adjacent sites must be greater than zero . from ( [ change ] ) , the disorder potential differences @xmath112 are restricted between @xmath113 . @xmath92 equals @xmath114 in the onsite limit and decreases with decreasing @xmath7 , as shown in fig . 1(a ) and ( b ) compare @xmath115 and @xmath116 for arrays with purely onsite interactions ( @xmath117 ) with arrays with long range interactions ( @xmath118 ) at two spacings , @xmath119 and @xmath120 . in all cases , @xmath13 and @xmath121 are calculated for arrays with 50 islands in between two grounded leads . the histograms average the values of the potentials of all islands and the values of the potential drops between all adjacent islands over many realizations of disorder @xmath122 . the smaller spacing , @xmath119 , is typical of chemically assembled nanoparticle arrays . the larger spacing , @xmath120 , is atypical of arrays in most experiments but is mainly included as a pedagogical example because it has interactions among islands that are finite yet comparable to the onsite case that is often used to describe experiments @xcite . arrays recently synthesized@xcite have large @xmath7 values . in fig . 1(a ) , @xmath115 is a constant between @xmath123 for the onsite case . as the range of interactions increases ( decreasing @xmath124 , the width of @xmath115 decreases because the disorder potential values are bound by @xmath125 . increasing coulomb interactions also increases ( decreases ) the probability of small ( large ) values of @xmath126 . in fig . 1(b ) , the onsite @xmath127 distribution is given by ( [ pdmuonsite ] ) . similar to the trends in fig . 1(a ) , as the range of coulomb interactions increases , the width of the distribution decreases and the probability of small ( large ) @xmath128 values increases ( decreases ) . the increased probabilities of small @xmath128 are due to coulomb correlations that make it more likely for the disorder potentials of neighboring islands to have similar values . see fig . 2 . increasing the range of coulomb interactions leads to a greater relative reduction in the width of @xmath127 than @xmath129 because the former are bound by @xmath113 whereas the latter are bound by @xmath125 . in the onsite case , @xmath130 equals @xmath114 for all junctions between two islands and increasing coulomb interactions can reduce @xmath92 significantly due to an decrease ( increase ) in @xmath131 ( @xmath132 ) . see ( [ excitonic ] ) . our results for @xmath116 differ to some extent from those by elteto et al@xcite , calculated with an inverse capacitance matrix @xmath133 that is finite only for nearest neighbors and charge disorder modelled by a set of stationary quenched charges . elteto et al@xcite distributions are bound by @xmath134 instead of by @xmath92 due to the lack of correlations in their quenched disorder model . we permit the interactions among the screening charges to determine whether or not the disorder potentials are correlated . in fig . 2 , we plot @xmath135 to show how interactions among charges affect the correlations among disorder potentials . in the onsite case , correlations are finite only if @xmath48 . in this case , the disorder potentials of different islands are uncorrelated . in the case of long - range interactions with @xmath136 , correlations are maximal when @xmath48 , but they do not vanish for @xmath137 . @xmath135 is finite for at least @xmath138 . the correlation of disorder decays faster than the interactions as shown in the figure . the correlations between @xmath85 and its nearest neighbors @xmath139 make it more likely for the disorder potential differences @xmath140 to have small magnitudes . the threshold voltage is the minimum voltage which allows the flow of current . in this section we analyze the threshold voltage of one - dimensional arrays with long - range interactions for both clean and disordered systems . as in the short - range case the threshold is completely determined by energetic considerations and is independent of junction resistance disorder . in the clean case we find that the threshold equals the minimum voltage necessary to create an electron - hole pair and increases with the number of particles at a rate which depends on @xmath7 . for charge disordered arrays the average threshold is reduced compared to the onsite interactions case , and increases linearly with the number of islands , with a slope that decreases with decreasing @xmath7 , i.e. with increasing the range of the interaction . when the interaction strength between charges at the nanoparticle and those at the electrodes does not vanish for any particle the polarization potential drop at every junction is finite . in a clean array , the potential gradient created by this polarization potential drop allows current once an electron - hole pair is created , opposite to what happens in the onsite case . as a result , the threshold voltage equals the mimimum voltage which allows the creation of an electron - hole pair . the cost in energy to create an electron - hole pair in junction @xmath49 in an uncharged array ( i.e. an array in which the nanoparticles have no excess charges ) is @xmath141 . we can define a junction dependent threshold voltage for creating an electron - hole pair @xmath142 . in the onsite limit @xmath143 is finite only at one or both contact junctions and infinite at the bulk , but with long - range interactions @xmath144 is finite at every junction . for those cases analyzed , we have found that due to the smaller value of the excitonic energy and the larger potential drop @xmath145 is smallest at the contact junctions and the threshold voltage is controlled by them . figs . 3(a ) and ( b ) show the dependence of the threshold voltage @xmath146 of clean , symmetrically biased arrays with long - range interactions on the number of islands in the array @xmath1 and on the spacing between array sites , @xmath7 . the threshold voltage is determined by those factors that define the polarization potential drops across the contacts , @xmath147 and @xmath148 . @xmath146 increases with increasing @xmath1 because the fraction of the polarization potential which drops across the contact junctions decreases as @xmath1 increases . as the spacing between the leads increases , the polarization potential drop across each contact decreases until eventually it reaches a minimum value at which the polarization of each contact is only due to the interaction of each contact with the lead closest to it . as a result , @xmath146 increases sublinearly with increasing @xmath1 and eventually saturates . for @xmath1 and @xmath7 large enough that the polarization potential drop across the contacts is not strongly influenced by interactions with the opposite lead , decreasing the array spacing decreases the polarization potential drop across the contact junctions and the threshold increases . for @xmath1 and @xmath7 small enough that both leads strongly influence the polarization of both contact junctions , decreasing the spacing increases the polarization potential drop across the leads and the threshold decreases . the potential drops and threshold can be estimated by using an unscreened @xmath149 model for the inverse capacitance elements associated with the leads , @xmath150 and @xmath151 . these estimates are included as dashed lines in figs . 3(a ) and ( b ) . of symmetrically biased arrays @xmath152 , with no disorder as a function of number of islands @xmath1 and of array spacing @xmath7 for the inverse capacitances calculated as described in appendix i. as decribed in the text , the threshold voltage of clean arrays is controlled by the value @xmath153 at the contact junctions . the dashed lines are estimates of the threshold voltage that use a @xmath149 interaction to approximate the polarization potential drops across the contact junctions @xmath154 and @xmath155 . inset in ( b ) : threshold voltage of clean arrays for several array parameters as a function of @xmath28 normalized to the value for a symmetrically biased array . from top to bottom @xmath156 ; @xmath157 ; and @xmath158 . ( c ) main figure : average threshold voltage of disordered arrays versus the array length at three different array spacings . the solid line shows the dependence of the average threshold on array length in the limit of onsite interactions . the inset shows the root mean square deviation of the threshold voltage distribution . for small @xmath7 it deviates from the @xmath159 dependence found in the onsite case ( in solid line ) . in inset and main figure dashed - dot lines are a guide to the eye and same legend as in ( a ) applies , width=3 ] as shown in the inset of fig . 3(b ) @xmath146 changes smoothly with @xmath28 , contrary to the peak - valley structure found in the onsite interaction case@xcite . the threshold voltage depends less on @xmath28 as @xmath1 increases and as @xmath7 decreases because the applied voltage drops more homogenously across the array junctions . this dependence disappears completely if the polarization potential drops linearly . in this last case the threshold voltage of clean arrays would be @xmath160 . this threshold is linear in the number of particles , as in the onsite case , but its origin of linearity and its slope differs in both cases . in the charge disordered onsite case every up - step in the disorder potential prevents current flow and has to be compensated by a charge gradient . as a result , the threshold voltage is controlled by the number of up - steps , but this is not the case for long - range interactions . in the long - range case the situation is more complex . due to the finite polarization potential drop at the inner junctions the number of junctions which prevent the flow of current is reduced , compared to the onsite case . up - steps in the disorder potential drop can localize the charge only if its value is larger than the polarization potential drop at the same junction . in some cases in which there is finite polarization drop at a junction , that is slightly smaller than the energy cost for tunneling it is possible that a small increase in the voltage in the electrodes permits the tunneling . increasing the voltage above the minimum bias voltage which permits the generation of electron - hole pairs will , in some cases , but not always , result in a negative potential drop at the given junction allowing the flow of charges . but , quite often , the entrance of more charges and the creation of a charging potential gradient will be required in a similar way as it happened in the onsite case . note that due to the polarization voltage drop at the bulk , the threshold junction can be other than the contact ones . moreover , the interaction between charges in different islands decreases the energy for the entrance of a charges with opposite sign and increases the one for the entrance of charges with the same sign . this effect was attributed to an attraction ( repulsion ) between the injected soliton and an antisoliton ( soliton ) on the array by likharev and coauthors@xcite . accumulation of charges in the array increases the threshold voltage . on the other hand a value of @xmath85 at the contact islands favourable for the entrance of charge unto the array can decrease it , as the polarization potential drop to allow entrance of charge is smaller . both mechanisms compete to determine @xmath146 . for large @xmath7 the accumulation of charges is more important as the voltage drop at the bulk junctions is small and on average @xmath146 of large arrays will increase compared to the clean array threshold voltage . on the contrary the second effect can be more important for small @xmath7 . numerically we have found a linear dependence of the threshold voltage on the number of particles in the array , see fig . 3(c ) . decreasing the array spacing decreases the average thresholds below the threshold values of the arrays in the onsite limit . the expected behavior of the average threshold value as compared to the clean limit , discussed above , is found . only at the largest array spacing ( @xmath120 ) studied do we recover the dependence of the fluctuations of the threshold voltage on array length predicted by middleton and wingreen@xcite , see inset of fig . in this section we discuss the three main voltage regimes which can be distinguished in the i - v curve . at voltages very close to the threshold , we show that the current is linear in @xmath161 . contrary to the short - range interaction case , the slope of this linearity depends , not only on the junction resistance and on @xmath28 , but also on the number of islands and on @xmath7 . for given @xmath28 , @xmath1 , @xmath7 and @xmath162 , in the presence of charge disorder , the slope of the i - v curve close to threshold can depend on the potential disorder configuration . at intermediate voltages steps in the current are smoothed compared to the onsite interaction case . a linear i - v with an offset voltage , closely related to the one found for short range interactions , characterizes the high voltage regime . , much lower than the values used in experiments to check the power - law dependence close to threshold . ( a ) shows how varying the length and spacing of symmetrically biased arrays affects the slopes of the linear regimes , due to the change in the polarization potential drop factors @xmath153 and correspondingly the fraction of potential which drops in the junction which acts as bottle - neck . ( b ) in a similar way , the slope depends on how symmetrically is the array biased . ( c)plots the i - v curves and derivatives corresponding to clean arrays with equal length , @xmath7 and @xmath28 but different junction resistances . resistances in these plots vary randomly in between @xmath163 , @xmath164 and @xmath165 in top , middle and lower curves . ( d)i - v curves corresponding to three different realizations of charge - disordered arrays with all junction resistances equal @xmath166 and @xmath152 . contrary to what was found for onsite interactions the slope of the low - voltage linear current can be different for different arrays with the same nominal parameters if there is charge disorder . this reflects that the bottle - neck is not necessarily a contact junction but can be a junction in the bulk . , width=3 ] for the onsite interaction case we recently resolved the controversy@xcite on the power law dependence of current on @xmath161 , showing that very close to threshold it is linear@xcite . such a linearity is due to the bottle - neck character of one of the junctions and the linear dependence of the energy for tunneling on the bias voltage . these two assumptions remain valid for long - range interactions , so the linear @xmath161 dependence is also found in this case . in the case of clean arrays , the threshold and low - voltage bottle - neck for current are found at the contact junctions and @xmath167 except for @xmath36 , for which @xmath168 and @xmath169 have to be added in the expression for the slope . dependence in @xmath1 , @xmath7 and @xmath28 via the dependence of @xmath170 on these parameters is found as seen in fig.4 ( a ) and ( b ) . the value of @xmath171 which appears in the expression of @xmath146 is the same that controls the linearity of the iv curves very close to theshold . the behavior of the slope of @xmath172 vs @xmath161 with @xmath28 , @xmath1 and @xmath7 is opposite to the one of @xmath146 . for @xmath28 different from @xmath173 , increasing @xmath1 and decreasing @xmath7 decreases the slope because these changes reduce the fraction of the polarization potential that drops across the contact junctions . biasing the array in a more assymetric way ( increasing @xmath174 changes the slope as the fraction of the polarization potential that drops across the contact junction that serves as a bottle - neck at small voltages is modified . the slope does also depend on the junction resistances , similar to the dependence found for onsite interactions@xcite , see fig . the charge disordered case is to some extent different . the above threshold bottle - neck ( and below threshold current - blocking ) junction is not necessarily either of the contact junctions , so the slope of the linear dependence can be controlled by @xmath153 with @xmath175 . the junction that acts as the bottle - neck depends on the particular disorder configuration . this is shown in fig . 4(d ) , which plots the current and its derivative with respect to voltage for several configurations of disorder corresponding to the same value of @xmath7 , @xmath1 and @xmath28 and the same junction resistances . a similar dependence of the slope on the charge disorder configuration was not present in the short - range case , as the energy gain for tunneling is directly modified by changes in the bias potential only at the contact junctions , at least for @xmath36 . the slope is generally larger ( smaller ) when the bottleneck junction lies closer to the edge ( middle ) of the array . changing @xmath28 also modifies the slope of the disordered case , not shown . this modification can be due to the change of @xmath176 with or without a change in the bottleneck junction . as in the onsite case@xcite the linearity of the current disappears when the bottle - neck description stops being valid . this happens at very small values of @xmath177 . it is easy to show how this situation leads to sublinear behavior . assume that the transport happens through a sequence of @xmath11 tunneling processes and consider a bottle - neck process with rate @xmath178 with @xmath179 and another process in the sequence with rate @xmath180 . here @xmath181 is the gain in energy of the second process at @xmath182 . if these two processes have rates much smaller than the rest of processes in the sequence , the current can be approximated by and respectively to @xmath166 with onsite interaction ; @xmath166 with @xmath136 ; @xmath183 with @xmath184 ; @xmath166 with @xmath184 . the lowest curve corresponds to a @xmath166 and @xmath37 and @xmath184 . the threshold voltage has been substracted . @xmath146 equals 98 , 43 , 14 , 16 and 9.7 respectively . in the onsite case it is necessary to create a charge gradient at every junction to allow current , but once charge can reach the opposite electrode it flows easily and the i - v shows a large jump close to threshold . for @xmath184 a charge gradient is not created and bulk junctions slow the current flow producing the staircase structure . the step width is smaller for forward bias @xmath37 than for symmetric bias , but contrary to the behavior found in the coulomb staircase for onsite interactions , with long - range interactions the step width is not fixed . the steps are washed out for @xmath136 due to a more homogeneous polarization potential drop through the array . ( b ) i - v curves for disordered arrays with @xmath185 . the clean case is included for comparison . ( c ) i - v in a large voltage scale for clean arrays with homogeneous resistances , from top to bottom solid lines correspond to @xmath136 , @xmath184 and onsite interactions . the dashed lines give the asymptotic predictions for @xmath136 and @xmath186 . at high voltages all the curves have the same slope given by @xmath187 . the offset voltages differ as the excitonic energies do . in spite of the very different threshold voltage and the different dependence on voltage close to threshold , the @xmath184 i - v curve differs little from the onsite one at high voltages . ( d ) i - v curves in a large voltage scale corresponding to @xmath136 symmetrically biased arrays . from top to bottom @xmath183 and @xmath166 disordered arrays with homogeneous resistances and a @xmath166 clean array with the first resistance ten times larger than the other ones . dashed lines give the asymptotic predictions . the slope of both @xmath166 curves differ , but their offset voltages are the same . , width=3 ] @xmath188 the slope of the current and the lost of linearity depends on the resistance of the junctions , as was also seen in the onsite case@xcite . in the clean long - range case comparing the values of @xmath153 the linear behavior lasts longer in shorter arrays , smaller @xmath7 and smaller @xmath28 , as in these cases the values of @xmath153 are more homogenous throughout the array . the disordered long - range case is more complex . due to the non - homogeneous increase in polarization voltage drop a junction which has a small energy gain can increase this gain more than other junctions when the applied voltage increases and the dependence of the slope with the array parameters is not so easily predicted . if the value of the voltage is increased further several tunneling processes are energetically allowed at each step in a sequence and the discussion of transport becomes more complex due to the multiple choices available and the polarization potential drop at the bulk junctions . above the linear regime there is a region of smoothed steps in the i - v curve . decreasing @xmath7 smooths the steps and for small @xmath7 they are hardly distinguishable . this behavior is seen in fig . 5(a ) which compares the onset of current , at voltages not extremely close to threshold , for several array parameters . for clarity the curves have been plotted as a function of @xmath161 . the staircase profile differs in all these cases . the top curve corresponds to an @xmath166 array with short - range interactions , previously studied@xcite . in this case to allow current flow a charge gradient at each bulk junction has to be created , but once charge can enter the array it flows easily through it . this is reflected in the sharp onset of the current close to threshold . the steps at higher voltages are just barely visible at this scale . once the polarization voltage at each junction is finite it is not necessary to create a charge gradient at the inner junctions and the steps shape is modified . the three bottom curves correspond to @xmath184 . several features can be appreciated in these curves . the step shape is clearly seen . as the potential drop at the inner junction is small , bulk junctions control the flow of currents at each plateau and their slope is small . the slope is larger for shorter arrays , and the step width depends on the value of @xmath28 . the dependence of the step width on @xmath28 was also found for onsite interactions , but contrary to the short range case , for finite @xmath7 the step width is not a constant throughout the curve as the presence of charges in the array influences the energy cost to add charges from the electrodes , to the first or last island . as also seen in this figure , for small @xmath7 the polarization potential drop at the inner junction is larger and similar to what happened in the onsite case ( but for reasons to some extent different ) once the charge enters the array it can flow easily . in ( b ) we can see the different i - v curves in clean and disordered arrays . specially interesting is the disordered @xmath136 i - v characteristic . it looks superlinear , similar to what would be found if a power - law larger than unity is present at these voltages . we have observed that this approximate superlinear type dependence is common in disordered arrays with small @xmath7 . if experimentally the power - law behavior expected close to threshold is measured at these voltages ( larger than those at which the linear behavior is predicted ) the exponent of the power - law could be erroneously assigned a value larger than one . at very high voltages , in the onsite interaction case we showed@xcite that the current can be approximated by the asymptotic expression @xmath189 with @xmath190 . the arguments , based on a uniform tunneling rate through all the junctions in this voltage regime , which led to this expression remain valid in the long - range case , with the only change of the quantitative value of the excitonic energies @xmath191 . the slope of the current does not depend on the range of the interaction or the presence of charge disorder but the offset voltage at which the asymptotic expression cuts the zero current axis , does@xcite . confirmation of the validity of ( [ highcurrent ] ) is seen in figs . 5(c ) and ( d ) , where numerical results are compared with the asymptotic behavior predicted by ( [ highcurrent ] ) . in fig . 5(c ) the i - vs for symmetrically biased arrays with @xmath166 nanoparticles and different interaction range are plotted . at high voltages slopes are equal but the offset voltage to which they extrapolate it is not . note the difference between the value of threshold and the one of the offset . in particular the @xmath184 curve has a smaller threshold and larger offset than the @xmath136 . in fig . 5(d ) the influence of the number of junctions and their resistance in the high - voltage current is reported and shown to be in good agreement with the approximate prediction . in this section we analyze the effect of long - range interactions in the voltage drop through the array . we differentiate the same three regimes as in previous section . differences found with respect to the onsite case , previously analyzed@xcite are mainly due to the polarization potential drop at the bulk junctions , which vanishes in the onsite limit but is finite when interactions between the charges at the islands and those at the electrodes are long - range . arrays with different parameters . both ( a ) and ( b ) correspond to clean arrays . main figures are for @xmath152 and long - range interaction . the average potential drop essentially equals the polarization potential for each value of @xmath7 , which is plotted as filled small dots in ( b ) for comparison . this behavior contrasts with the potential due to the charge gradient which has to be created in the onsite case , shown in the inset of ( a ) . as shown by comparing main figure in ( a ) with the inset in ( b ) a change in the value of @xmath28 modifies @xmath192 and correspondingly the potential drop through the array . , width=3 ] as discussed in section iv , in a clean array , @xmath146 is given by the minimum bias voltage which allows the creation of an electron - hole pair . contrary to the onsite case@xcite there is no charge accumulation in the array . it is thus expected that very close to @xmath146 the voltage drop reflects the polarization drop @xmath193 at each junction . the potential drop distribution thus depend on the length of the array @xmath1 , the bias asymmetry @xmath28 and on the range of the interactions @xmath7 . this dependence is confirmed in figs . 6(a ) and ( b ) where the potential drop is plotted for different array parameters . the value of @xmath194 is included for comparison in fig . the voltage drop is very different from the one found to the onsite case ( included in the inset of fig . 6(a ) ) , where in the bulk it is due to charge accumulation at the islands . the dependence on the value of the resistance is extremely weak even once the polarization potential drop is substracted ( not shown ) and not observable , except if the difference in the value of resistances is very large . in the disordered case with long - range interaction it is possible that once charge is allowed to enter the array it can flow . then the average potential drop is approximately the sum of the disorder potential and the polarization potential . in general , when this happens the threshold voltage is smaller than the one in the clean case as the disorder potential reduces the polarization potential drop necessary at at least one of the contact junctions . but for large @xmath7 is more probable that one or more charges remain stacked in the array , similarly to the case of onsite interactions and the charge potential due to these stacked charges has to be added . at intermediate voltages , in the coulomb staircase regime , we saw in the onsite case@xcite that the voltage drop through the array shows an oscillatory behavior , with the number of maxima increasing from step to step . a similar behavior is found in fig . 7(a ) corresponding to a clean array and @xmath184 . in fig . 7(b ) for all the voltages plotted the number of maxima is two , and their amplitude decreases until at the largest voltage oscillations can not be discerned . comparing with fig . 5 one realizes that the step number has not changed . the i - v curves reaches the high - voltage regime without showing stepwise behavior . at high voltages , the potential drop is qualitatively similar to the one found in the onsite case@xcite . the voltage drops linearly only after subtracting from each junction the excitonic energy . the sum of the excitonic energies results in the offset voltage . the current is equal to @xmath195 and the corresponding voltage drop at each junction is @xmath196 which satisfies @xmath197 . eq.([drophigh ] ) is valid for both ordered and disordered arrays . some examples of this behavior are shown in are shown in fig . 7 . in fig . 7(c ) we can see that as expected , in the absence of resistance disorder , once the excitonic energy is substracted the potential drops homogeneously through the array even if there is charge disorder , while it is proportional to the resistance value when resistances are not homogeneous , as in fig . 7(d ) . and @xmath166 . upper figures correspond to clean arrays . curves in ( a ) are for @xmath184 and ( from top to bottom ) @xmath198 . the oscillations in average potential found in the onsite case at intermediate bias voltages are still present , and the number of maxima increases in two when going to a higher step . in ( b ) @xmath136 and @xmath199 . the number of maxima has not increased in this range of voltages but oscillations are smoothed with increasing bia voltage . in spite of the large value of the voltage the current is still in the first step of the coulomb staircase , see fig . the potential drop at @xmath200 resembles the one at high voltages , homogeneous except by the excitonic term responsible of the offset . in ( c ) and ( d ) the excitonic energy has been substracted from the average potential drop at high voltages . once this term is substracted the average potential drop is completely homogeneous through the array in ( c ) where there is charge disorder , and all resistances are equal but not in ( d ) which corresponds to a clean array but with resistances which vary randomly between @xmath163 , width=3 ] in this paper we have analyzed the effect of the long - range interaction in the transport through ordered and disordered nanoparticle arrays . to this end we have introduced a model which allows a discussion of the relevant quantities in determining these transport properties . we have introduced the concept of polarization potential drop , which results from the interaction between charges at the electrodes and at the islands . in the model used we take into account that electrodes are not ideal voltage sources . their potential fluctuates in response to tunneling processes ( but its effect in the numerical results is very small ) . we have studied how the proximity of the nanoparticles modifies the @xmath0-interaction due to screening . to determine this screening we have developed two methods which allow us to calculate the inverse capacitance matrix of the system under study , see appendix i. as discussed in appendix ii , and shown in fig . 8(a ) , for the case of metallic nanoparticles , here considered , the effect of screening starts to be relevant when @xmath201 , there is no divergency in the value of @xmath131 at small @xmath7 values , but capacitance values and their inverses saturate at finite values . as discussed previously by matsuoka and likharev@xcite for cylindrical nanoparticles , the interaction between charges is reduced only when the nanoparticles are very close , at larger distances the interaction increases and approaches the @xmath0 law from above , resulting in a bump in the interaction potential as compared to coulomb law , see fig . we have related this anti - screening effect with the dipolar charges induced in the conductors . long - range interactions screen the disorder potential and induce correlations between the values of @xmath13 at different islands . these correlations are related to , but smaller than the inverse capacitance matrix elements . the distribution of the island and junction potentials is modified in comparison to the one found for onsite interactions . these effects are discussed in section iii , and are shown in figs . 1 and 2 . as discussed in section iv , as in the onsite case , the current is blocked up to a threshold value @xmath146 . this threshold value is independent of the resistances of the junctions . in clean arrays , @xmath146 is the minimum voltage that allows the creation of an electron - hole pair , see figs . 3(a ) and ( b ) . this behavior is opposite to the one found in the onsite case where a charge gradient at the junctions has to be created to allow the flow of current . with long - range interactions , the polarization potential drop across the array creates a potential gradient which facilitates charge flow . in the disordered case , two effects compete that can increase or decrease the threshold voltage compared to the clean case . charge accumulation can be induced by up - steps in the disorder potential , increasing @xmath146 , and the disorder potential distribution can reduce the energy to create an electron - hole pair decreasing it . the latest effect dominates for small @xmath7 , see fig . the current varies linearly with respect voltage close to threshold , in the bottle - neck regime . this is discussed in section v and plotted in fig . the slope depends , as the threshold voltage does on the polarization potential drop , and also on the resistance of the bottle - neck junction . at intermediate voltages , we find steps in the current , but these are smoothed as compared to the onsite case , see fig . 5(a ) and ( b ) . contrary to the onsite case , due to the interaction between the charges in different islands the width of the steps is not fixed . a linear dependence of current on voltage is recovered for large biases , but as in the onsite case , current extrapolates to zero at a finite offset voltage ( fig . 5(c ) and ( d ) ) . the offset voltage is given by the sum of the excitonic energies of all the junctions , and its value depends on the range of the interaction , but as in the case of onsite interactions the slope of the current is given by the sum of the resistances in series and is independent of @xmath7 . the voltage drop through the array close to threshold , reflects the polarization contribution @xmath68 due to the electrodes , as shown in fig . 6 . in the onsite case , the potential drop in this bottle - neck regime was due to the charge accumulation at the islands , necessary to create a potential gradient through the array . shown in fig . 7 , at intermediate voltages an oscillatory voltage drop through the array , similar to the one found for short range interactions is found for large values of @xmath7 . for small @xmath7 there is some remnant of this behavior but the amplitude of the oscillations can vanish while still being in the first step of the coulomb staircase , which is not well defined in this case . at large voltages , the potential drop is analogous to the one found in the onsite case . in conclusion , we have found that the long - range character of the interaction modifies the i - v characteristics of one - dimensional arrays for both ordered and disordered arrays . this modification is greatly due to the finite polarization potential drop at the bulk junctions , due to the interactions between charges at the islands and at the electrodes . differences in transport as a function of the range of the interaction are larger at low voltages . in both the long - range and onsite cases the current is blocked up to a threshold voltage @xmath146 and the current depends linearly on for very small @xmath161 , but the value of both @xmath146 and the slope of the current are different in both cases , as the mechanism to create a potential gradient through the array differs . at high voltages , for given values of the excitonic energies the transport in both cases is analogous . in this appendix we discuss the two methods that we have used to calculate the interaction strength @xmath202 . in the first one we determine the capacitance matrix using the method of images . this is an iterative method which a priori can be used to determine the capacitance matrix @xmath203 for any geometric configuration of spheres , so it is valid also for two - dimensional arrays , for example . although the algorithm for generating images is straightforward , the number of images required to calculate @xmath204 makes the numerical implementation of this technique nontrivial . while computer memory problems can be solved , the computation time is too large to tackle those cases with very large arrays and electrodes and small distance between conductors . on the other hand , the capacitance matrix is calculated to a given accuracy . small errors in @xmath203 can be enhanced and uncontrolled in @xmath205 . in the second method the interaction matrix @xmath205 is calculated directly taking into account the symmetry of the system and the properties of spherical harmonics . it requires the inversion of a matrix which can be quite large . it is specially useful and fast for systems with azimuthal symmetry as the one considered here . results obtained with both methods are in extremely good agreement . the method of images is based on the relation between charges and potentials in capacitively coupled conductors . the charge @xmath206 induced on a conductor in the presence of @xmath207 equipotentials at potentials @xmath208 is given by the capacitance matrix @xmath203 @xmath209 the inverse capacitance matrix which enters the free energy ( [ freecharge ] ) is the inverse of the capacitance matrix @xmath204 . we have calculated the capacitance matrix using some properties of spheres and the fact that the charge in a conductor @xmath28 produced by a unit potential in a conductor @xmath29 is equal to the capacitance matrix element @xmath204 . we have obtained @xmath202 inverting @xmath204 . the method of images@xcite is the placement of imaginary charges inside the spheres at positions that make the potential everywhere on the surface of the conductor equal a constant . to determine the positions of the image charges , we exploit two properties of spheres . first , the center of the sphere is equidistant from all points on the surface of the sphere . using this property , the surface of an sphere of radius @xmath25 can be set to a potential @xmath35 by placing an image at the center of the sphere of charge @xmath210 . second , for every point outside a sphere there is a point inside the sphere for which the ratio of the distances between these two points and any point on the surface of the sphere is a constant . from here it follows that if a charge @xmath211 is located at the outside point , at a distance @xmath212 from the center , an image charge @xmath213 placed at the inside a distance @xmath214 from the center in the radial line , with charge @xmath215 will set the potential to zero everywhere on the surface of the sphere . we determine the @xmath216 capacitance matrix , column by column , by determining the set of image charges that sets the potentials of the spheres to @xmath217 . the capacitance matrix elements @xmath203 are given by the sum of all the charges in sphere @xmath28 . to set the potential of the @xmath29 sphere , with radius @xmath218 to one , we place a charge with magnitude @xmath218 at the center of this sphere @xmath219 . the remaining spheres are grounded by placing images inside each sphere with charges @xmath220 at positions @xmath221 here @xmath222 and @xmath223 are the value and the position of the charge which creates the inhomogeneous potential that we want to compensate and @xmath224 and @xmath225 are the radius and position of the center of the sphere to which we add the image charge @xmath226 . these image charges are added to all the spheres except the one in which @xmath227 is placed . the charges that have been added generate new inhomogeneous potentials at the rest of the spheres and have to be compensated following the same method . this process repeats iteratively for all the charges added to all the spheres . during each iteration @xmath228 , the number of new images required to compensate the potential of the other spheres approximately equals @xmath229 . we eliminate some of the images by discarding images with a magnitude that is smaller than a suitable cutoff value , @xmath230 . we required @xmath230 to be small enough that the relative diffferences between the matrix elements generated with the cutoff value @xmath230 and by a larger cutoff value @xmath231 are less than one percent . following wehrli _ et al_@xcite , the energy of the system , given by ( [ freecharge ] ) can be rewritten in terms of the higher - order multipolar charges induced by the charges on the conductors as @xmath232 here greek indices denote the conductors , @xmath233 and @xmath234 denote the order of the multipole , and @xmath235 and @xmath236 denote the azimuthal number . this matrix @xmath237 is hermitian with respect to the exchange of @xmath238 and @xmath239 . using the linear response form for the induced multipoles , the higher - order multipolar charges , @xmath240 , can be expressed in terms of the ( monopolar ) charges on the conductors @xmath241 , as @xmath242 substituting ( [ qlm ] ) into ( [ freemultipolar ] ) and comparing it with ( [ freecharge ] ) , the inverse capacitance matrix can be expressed as @xmath243 the multipolar charge induced is the one which minimizes the energy . separating the monopolar contribution ( @xmath244 ) in the expression of the free energy , and minimizing the latter with respect to @xmath245 , we obtain @xmath246 here @xmath247 and @xmath248 , correspondingly @xmath249 , and the equation is written in vectorial and matrix notation . once this expression is substituted in the free energy , the inverse capacitance can be written in terms of the @xmath250 matrices @xmath251 the order of approximation in this method is the number of the highest multipoles @xmath252 included . matrix @xmath253 has dimension @xmath254 with @xmath255 the total number of conductors . matrices @xmath256 and @xmath257 are @xmath258 and ( @xmath259)@xmath260 respectively , and matrix @xmath261 has dimension @xmath262 . @xmath263 is the maximum number of multipolar terms considered . formally it is @xmath264 with @xmath265 the order of the maximum multipole included in the approximation . however the symmetries of the problem can help us to reduce it as the @xmath261 elements corresponding to certain @xmath266 can be seen to vanish by symmetry . in particular in the case of azimuthal symmetry , considered in the text , only @xmath267 gives non - zero values and the number of terms included can be reduced to @xmath268 . depending on the geometry of the conductors it can be convenient to use different number of @xmath265 for different conductors . in particular in the case of an array of small islands sandwiched by two large electrodes , it is better to use a larger number of multipoles at the electrodes . most of the cases presented here are done with @xmath269 . the expression for @xmath270 follows from the decomposition of @xmath271 , with @xmath272 , @xmath273 and @xmath274 three points in space and depends on the geometry of the conductors . for @xmath275 @xmath276^{1/2 } \\ ( -1)^{l_2+m_2}i_{l_1+l_2+m_1-m_2}(x_\beta - x_\alpha)\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath277 the irregular solid spherical harmonics @xmath278 the sign of @xmath279 depends not only on @xmath280 and @xmath281 , but also on the order @xmath282 or @xmath283 through the dependence of @xmath284 . for the case of an sphere @xmath28 with radius @xmath285 , @xmath286 @xmath287 the case of spheres on a row is especially simple . in this case we have azimuthal symmetry what means that all terms involving @xmath288 should vanish . thus at order @xmath265 we have just @xmath268 . this simplification allows us to go to reasonably high orders . we can eliminate the indexes @xmath289 from the matrix @xmath237 . together with the diagonal terms @xmath290 calculated above , and using that @xmath291 and @xmath292 and @xmath293 the equations are greatly simplified . thus @xmath294 for @xmath295 . here @xmath296 is the distance between the centers of the spheres @xmath28 and @xmath29 . the diagonal of @xmath297 and @xmath298 are zero and @xmath299 . note that @xmath300 and @xmath301 the zero - order approximation recovers our expectation for the case of far - apart spheres . the correction to the inverse capacitance due to the higher order multipoles is given by @xmath302 . as spheres come closer , higher order terms become more and more important . this is reasonable taking into account that the interaction between two multipolar charges @xmath303 and @xmath304 decays as @xmath305 . when two conductors become closer together the mobile charges in their surfaces screen the interaction between the charges in them , compared to the @xmath0 coulomb law which describes the interaction between two isolated point - like charges . other metallic systems in the surrounding environment contribute to this screening . it is expected that the charging energy of an sphere , or the energy to create an electron - hole pair between two islands will depend on the distance between the particles in the array . in this appendix we describe the modification of the interaction due to screening and compare it with other models and calculations available in the literature . @xmath202 is calculated as described in appendix i. both methods described give the same value of @xmath205 to several digits when the accuracy used in the computation is good enough . here , inverse capacitances are measured in units of @xmath306 , the value of the inverse capacitance of a nanoparticle @xmath131 when it is isolated . we find that the effect of screening is essentially restricted to the interactions between charges which are in the same islands or in the closest neighboring islands and only when the particles are very close @xmath307 . , nearest - neighbor interaction @xmath308 and excitonic energy , all in units of @xmath309 , at the center of a 50 nanoparticle array ( without electrodes ) as a function of the interisland separation . solid - lines give the value obtained with a @xmath0 interaction between charges . the effect of screening is evident for @xmath307 . all the plotted quantities saturate to a finite value as @xmath7 vanishes.(b ) decay of the interaction potential from the center of a 50 nanoparticle array ( without electrodes ) as a function of island position for different values of @xmath7 . inverse capacitances are given in units of @xmath309 solid lines correspond to an unscreened @xmath0 law . the bump is clearly observed only for very small @xmath7 . it is much weaker than the one found in@xcite and is restricted to the first nearest neighbor . for large distances the @xmath0 law is approached from above . the effect of screening is negligible for @xmath310 . in ( a ) and ( b ) dashed and dotted lines are included as a guide to the eye.,width=3 ] three important quantities for the transport are the island inverse capacitance @xmath131 , the nearest - neighbor interaction @xmath308 and the resulting excitonic energy @xmath92 . in fig . 8(a ) we show how these quantities depend on the distance between the particles , @xmath7 for the case of an array with @xmath311 equal - sized islands , at the center of the array . the effects of screening start to be relevant for @xmath312 . at this value @xmath131 starts decreasing , and when @xmath313 , approximately at @xmath314 it saturates at about 0.68 of its bare value . @xmath315 increases following a @xmath0 law as @xmath316 is reduced , until @xmath201 . then it decreases slightly due to the screening of the interaction , and finally it saturates at about @xmath317 . at large @xmath7 the @xmath92 starts decreasing when @xmath7 is reduced , according to the @xmath0 increase of @xmath315 . for @xmath318 , its value is affected both by the increase of @xmath315 and the decrease of @xmath131 , at small distance is controlled by this last effect . finally it saturates . the modification of the distance dependent interaction in one - dimensional arrays has been previously studied for some particular island geometries . for the case of thin circular disks ( with disk axis perpendicular to the array axis ) , whan et al.@xcite found that a @xmath0 law describes well the dependence of the non - diagonal inverse capacitance matrix elements on distance and that the diagonal elements are reduced . likharev and matsuoka@xcite analyzed the cases of an array of cubic islands ( with inverse capacitance matrix calculated using the finite - differences software fastcap ) and a continuum model in which the discrete periodic structure is replaced by a continuous dielectric medium . they found that the dependence of the interaction on the distance between the charges @xmath319 has a crossover between a linear dependence at short distances and a @xmath0 law at long distances . there is a bump on the interaction when compared to a @xmath0 law . the potential approaches the @xmath0 law from above . the interaction potential could by approximated by the expression @xmath320 \right ) \ ] ] here @xmath321 is the distance in units of the array period , @xmath322 , @xmath323 , with @xmath324 a characteristic decay length of the interaction . @xmath325 , the inter - islands dielectric constant , @xmath326 the junction surface and @xmath327 a fitting parameter with value very close to 1 and related to @xmath28 by @xmath328 the dependence of @xmath329 on @xmath50 that we have obtained for the experimentally relevant case of an array of spherical particles is plotted in fig . screening is less important for the case of spheres than for cubic islands but larger than for the thin disks analyzed by whan _ et al_@xcite . compared with a @xmath0 law , at short distance the screened interaction potential decreases and at large distances it increases . when the particles are very close , there is a bump in the renormalization of the interaction . only when two charges are in the same particle or at the nearest neighbor one the interaction between them decreases . in other cases the interaction increase . we have not been able to fit our results with ( [ fit ] ) . we recover the bump found by likharev and matsuoka@xcite , but it is smaller than the one they observe , even when our particles are very close . we believe that the differences are due to the different geometry of the system under study . from the decomposition of the induced screening charge in high - order multipoles discussed in previous appendix it is possible to get some insight on how does the bump appear . the correction to the inverse capacitance @xmath330 due to screening is @xmath331 , see ( [ correction ] ) , which has the same sign as the monopole - induced multipole interaction . thus , @xmath332 has the same sign as the interaction of the monopolar charge in @xmath28 with the multipolar charge induced in all conductors by the monopolar charge in @xmath29 . let us restrict to dipolar order , which will be the largest contribution . @xmath333 generates dipolar charges in all the other conductors @xmath80 , equal to @xmath334 and the monopolar charge in @xmath28 interact with these induced charges via @xmath335 . both the monopolar - dipolar interaction @xmath336 and the dipolar induced charges are odd quantities with respect to position . to dipolar order , all the elements of @xmath337 are positive . the sign of the two odd quantities will control the sign of @xmath332 . consider @xmath332 , with @xmath338 , the charges induced by a monopolar charge placed in @xmath29 in conductors from @xmath57 to @xmath339 and from @xmath340 to @xmath341 have the same sign , but the interaction of a monopolar charge in @xmath28 with them , have opposite . thus those terms coming from the charge induced in conductors from @xmath57 to @xmath339 and those from conductors @xmath342 to @xmath343 contribute to @xmath344 with different sign . the sign of the contribution of the conductors at the right of @xmath29 will be the same as those at the left of @xmath28 and both induced charge and interaction have opposite sign . as further are these conductors to @xmath28 and @xmath29 the correction will be smaller . individual contributions from each conductor @xmath80 will be larger when @xmath345 . the contribution of the interaction term which comes from the dipoles generated in conductors between @xmath28 and @xmath29 increase @xmath202 . only when the contribution of the terms which decrease the inverse capacitance matrix element is able to compensate the contribution of those ones which increase it , the total change will be negative . as closer are @xmath28 and @xmath29 the number of terms increasing the interaction will decrease . @xmath202 is expected to be smaller than the bare value , only if @xmath28 and @xmath29 are very close , what results in the appearance of the bump and the anti - screening effect at intermediate and large distances . the interaction obtained differs considerably from the one resulting from capacitive coupling only to nearest - neighbors . this form of the interaction has been used frequently in the literature , and applies when the system is coupled to a gate electrode which screens the long - range part . the capacitance matrix has a triband form . only @xmath346 and @xmath347 are finite . the inverse of @xmath348 for the case of an infinite array becomes @xmath349 with @xmath350 and @xmath351 defined from @xmath352 . due to the exponential dependence @xmath350 can be viewed as the decay length of the interaction , which increases with @xmath353 . interactions on the same island are given by @xmath354 . in the case of a finite array of length @xmath1 this value is approached , from below , as @xmath1 increases . the onsite case is recovered when @xmath355 and long - range interactions appear in the opposite limit @xmath356 . in the later limit the interaction potential goes like @xmath357 it decays linearly with distance . the energy to create an electron - hole pair @xmath358 remains bound and equal to @xmath359 . on the contrary , the diagonal element @xmath360 diverges with the array size . there is not such unphysical divergence in @xmath131 with the array size in our model . to analyze the transport properties the array is sandwiched between two electrodes , much larger than each of the nanoparticles . to this end we consider a one - dimensional array of @xmath1 nanoparticles placed in between two large spheres , with radius @xmath25 , which play the role of the leads . the large size ensures large screening and that @xmath361 and @xmath362 are much smaller than the islands @xmath131 . the spherical shape greatly simplifies the calculations of the inverse capacitance matrix . the interaction between the charges at the islands and those at the electrodes and the inverse capacitance elements of the electrodes determine @xmath176 and @xmath363 , which control the polarization voltage drop through the array and to a large extent the current flow at small voltages , see figs . 6(a ) and ( b ) . for the size of the electrodes used in the text , @xmath364 , the inverse capacitance of the islands close to the electrodes is slightly reduced compared to those at the center , except for very small @xmath7 . for small @xmath7 the inverse capacitance of islands at the center of the array is almost insensitive to the presence of the electrodes . if the electrodes are much larger the dependence of the inverse capacitance matrix elements with the size of the electrodes can become non - monotonous . this behavior , like the one found for small @xmath7 is most probably associated to the spherical shape chosen to model the electrodes . we thank s. wehrli for useful discussions . financial support from the swiss national foundation , nccr manep of the swiss national fonds , the spanish science and education ministry through ramn y cajal contract fpi fellowship and grant no . fis2005 - 05478-c02 - 02 and the direccin general de universidades e investigacin de la consejera de educacin de la comunidad de madrid and csic through grant no . 200550m136 is gratefully acknowledged . work at ut austin was supported by the welch foundation , by the nsf under grant dmr-0606489 and by the aro under grant w911nf-07 - 1 - 0439 . 99 r.l.whetten , j.t . khoury , m.m . alvarez , s.murthy , i. vezmar , z.l . wang , p.w . stephens , c.l . cleveland , w.d . luedtke and u. landman , adv . * 8 * , 428 ( 1996 ) . collier , r.j . saykally , j.j . shiang , s.e . henrichs , j.r . heath , science * 277 * , 1978 ( 1997 ) . g. markovich , c. p. collier , s.e . henrichs , f. remacle , r.d . levine and j.r . heath , acc . 32 * , 415 ( 1999 ) . r. parthasarathy , x - m lin and h. m. jaeger , phys . lett . * 87 * , 186807 ( 2001 ) j.d . le , y. pinto , n.c . seeman , k. musier - forsyth , t.a . taton and r.a . kiehl , nanoletters * 4 * , 2343 ( 2004 ) . y. lin , a. bker , j. he , k. sill , h. xiang , c. abetz , x. li , j. wang , t. emrick , s. long , q. wang , a. balazs and t.p . russell , nature * 434 * , 55 ( 2005 ) . k. elteto , x .- lin and h.m . jaeger , phys . b * 71 * , 205412 ( 2005 ) . j. zhang , y.liu , y. ke and h. yan , nanoletters * 6 * , 248 ( 2006 ) . t.p . bigioni , x .- m.lin , t.t . nguyen , e.i . corwin , t.a . witten and h. m. jaeger , nature materials * 5 * , 265 ( 2006 ) . j. liao , l. bernard , m. langer , c. schnenberger and m. calame , adv . mater.*18 * , 2803 ( 2006 ) . ( ojo comprobar si es 2803 o 2444 ) . s.s . mark , m. bergkvist , x. yang , l.m . teixeira , p. bhatnagar , e. r. angert and c.a . batt , langmuir * 22 * , 3763 ( 2006 ) murray , c.r . kagan and m.g . bawendi , science * 270 * , 1335 ( 1995 ) . d.v.talapin , e.v . shevchenko , a. kornowski , n. gaponik , m. haase , a.l . rogach and h. weller , adv . * 13 * , 1868 ( 2001 ) . morgan , c.a . leatherdale , m. drndc , m.v . jarosz , m.a . kastner and m. bawendi , phys . rev . b*66 * , 075339 ( 2002 ) . v.j . porter , t. mentzel , s. charpentier , m.a . kastner and m.g . bawendi , phys . b * 73 * , 155303 ( 2006 ) . d. yu , c. wang , b.l . wehrenberg and p. guyot - sionnest , phys . lett . * 92 * , 216802 ( 2004 ) . h. romero and m. drndic , phys . lett . * 95 * , 156801 ( 2005 ) . t. feng , h. yu , m. dicken , j.r . heath and h.a . atwater , app . * 86 * , 033103 ( 2005 ) . s. sun , c.b . murray , d. weller , l. folks and a. moser , science * 287 * , 1989 ( 2000 ) . black , c.b . murray , r.l . sandstrom and s. sun , science * 290 * , 1131 ( 2000 ) v. f. puntes , p. gorostiza , d.m . aruguete , n.g . bastus and a.p . alivisatos , nature materials * 3 * , 263 ( 2004 ) . redl , k .- s . cho , c.b . murray and s. obrien , nature ( london ) * 423 * , 968 ( 2003 ) . a.e . saunders and b. a. korgel , chem . phys . chem . * 6 * , 61 ( 2005 ) . schevchenko , c.v . talapin , n.a . kotov , s. obrien and c.b . murray , nature ( london ) * 439 * , 55 ( 2006 ) . , _ nato asi series , vol b _ , 294 , eds . h. grabert and m.h . devoret . , new york , plenum press 1992 . p. sheng and b. abeles , phys . * 28 * , 34 ( 1972 ) . p. sheng , b. abeles and y. arie , phys . * 31 * , 44 ( 1973 ) . j.s . helman and b. abeles , phys . lett . * 37 * , 1429 ( 1976 ) . shiang , j.r . heath , c.p . collier and r.j . saykally , j. phys . b * 102 * , 3425 ( 1998 ) . kim , g. medeiros - ribeiro , d.a.a . ohlberg , r.s . williams and j.r . heath , j. phys . b * 103 * , 10341 ( 1999 ) . j.f . sampaio , k.c . beverly and j.r . heath , j. phys . b , * 105 * , 8797 ( 2001 ) i.s . weitz , j.l . sample , r.ries , e.m . spain and j.r . heath , j. phys . chem b * 104 * , 4288 ( 2000 ) . quinn , i. prieto , s. k. haram and a.j . bard , j. phys . b * 105 * , 7474 ( 2001 ) . doty , h. yu , c.k . shih and b.a . korgel , j. phys . b * 105 * , 8291 ( 2001 ) . a. courty , a. mermet , p.a . albouy , e. duval and m.p . pileni , nature materials * 4 * , 395 ( 2005 ) . ancona , w. kruppa , r.w . rendell , a.w . snow , d. park and j.b . boos , phys . b * 64 * , 033408 ( 2001 ) . a. bezryadin , r.m . westervelt , and m. tinkham , app . * 74 * , 2699 ( 1999 ) . bakhalov , g.s . kazacha , k.k . likharev and s.i . serdyukova , sov . jetp * 68 * , 581 ( 1989 ) . a.a . middleton and n.s . wingreen , phys . * 71 * , 3198 ( 1993 ) . k.a . matsuoka and k.k . likharev , phys . b * 57 * , 15613 ( 1998 ) kaplan , v.a . sverdlov and k.k . likharev , cond - mat/0303477 . m.shin , s. lee , k.w . park and e.h . lee , phys . lett . * 80 * , 5774 ( 1998 ) . m. stopa phys . b * 64 * , 193315 ( 2001 ) kaplan , v.a . sverdlov and k.k . likharev , phys . b * 65 * , 193309 ( 2002 ) . d.a . kaplan , v.a . sverdlov and k.k . likharev , phys . b * 68 * , 045321 ( 2003 ) . kinkhabwala , v.a . sverdlov , k.k . likharev , j , of phys . matter * 18 * 2013 ( 2006 ) . s. semrau , h. schoeller and w. wenzel , phys . b * 72 * , 205443 ( 2005 ) . r.kotliar and s. das sarma , superlatt . and microst . * 20 * , 641 ( 1996 ) . beloborodov , a.v . lopatin , v.m . vinokur and k.b . efetov , rev . phys . * 79 * , 469 ( 2007 ) . beloborodov , a. glatz and v.m . vinokur , phys . b * 75 * , 052302 ( 2007 ) . t.b . tran , i.s . beloborodov , x.m . lin , t.p . bigioni , v.m . vinokur and h.m . jaeger , phys . lett . * 95 * , 076806 ( 2005 ) . a. atland , l. glazman , a. kamenev , phys . lett . * 92 * , 026801 ( 2004 ) . meyer , a. kamenev and l.i . glazman , phys . b * 70 * , 045310 ( 2004 ) . y.l . loh , v. tripathi and m. turlakov , phys . b * 72 * , 233404 ( 2005 ) . k.b . efetov and a. tschersich , europhys . lett . * 59 * , 114 ( 2002 ) . j. zhang and b.i . shklovskii , phys . b * 70 * , 115317 ( 2004 ) . r. parthasarathy , x .- lin , k. elteto , t.f . rosenbaum and h.m . jaeger , phys . lett . * 92 * , 076801 ( 2004 ) . k. elteto , e. g. antonyan , t. t. nguyen , and h. m. jaeger , phys . b * 71 * , 064206 ( 2005 ) . beverly , j.f . sampaio and j.r . heath , j. phys . chem b * 106 * , 2131 ( 2002 ) . f. remacle , c.p . collier , g. markovich , j.r . heath , u. banin , r.d . levine j. phys . chem b * 102 * , 7727 ( 1998 ) . f. remacle , k.c . beverly , j.r . heath and r.d . levine , j. phys . chem b * 106 * 4116 ( 2002 ) . cordan , a. goltzen , y. herv , m. mejas , c. vieu and h. launois , jour . of app . phys . * 84 * , 3756 ( 1998 ) . a. ppin , c. vieu , m. mejias , y. jin , f. carcenac , j. gieraz , c. david , l. couraud , a. s. cordan , y. leroy and a. goltzen , app . . lett . * 74 * , 3047 ( 1999 ) . cordan , y. leroy , a. goltzen , a. pepin , c. vieu , m. mejias and h. launois , jour . of app . phys . * 87 * 345 ( 2000 ) . y. leroy , a. s. cordan and a. goltzen , jour . of app . phys . * 90 * 953 ( 2001 ) . hu and r.f . oconnell , phys . b * 49 * , 16773 ( 1994 ) . j.a . melsen , u. hanke , h.o . mller and k.a . chao , phys . b * 55 * , 10638 ( 1997 ) . c.a . berven and m.n . wybourne , app . . lett . * 78 * , 3893 ( 2001 ) . s. jha and a.a . middleton , cond - mat/0511094 c. kurdak , a.j . rimberg , t.r . ho and j. clarke , phys . rev . b * 57 * , r6842 ( 1998 ) . e. bascones , v. estvez , j.a . trinidad , a.h . macdonald , arxiv:0709.3718 k.k . likharev and k.a . matsuoka , appl . . lett . * 67 * , 3037 ( 1995 ) . whan , j. white and t.p . orlando , app . . lett . * 68 * , 2996 ( 1996 ) . c.reichhardt and c.j . o. reichhardt , phys . lett . * 90 * , 046802 ( 2003 ) . y. xue and m.a . ratner , phys . b * 68 * , 235410 ( 2003 ) . n.s.bakhalov , g.s . kazacha , k.k . likharev and s.i . serdyukova , physica b * 173 * , 319 ( 1991 ) . u. geigenmller and g. schn , europhys . lett . * 10 * , 765 ( 1989 ) . w.r . smythe _ static and dynamic electricity _ ( mcgraw - hill , new york , 1950 ) . s. wehrli , e. koch and m. sigrist , phys . rev . b * 68 * , 115412 ( 2003 ) . Abstract:
[ "we analyze the effect of the long - range interaction on the transport properties through ordered and disordered one - dimensional metallic nanoparticle arrays . we discuss how the threshold voltage , the i - v curves and the voltage drop through the array are modified as compared to the case in which interactions are restricted to charges placed on the same island . we show that some of these modifications are due to finite interactions between charges in different nanoparticles while other ones are due to interactions between charges in the islands and those at the electrodes , what produces a polarization potential drop through the array . we study the screening of the disorder potential due to charged impurities trapped in the substrate and find that long - range interactions introduce correlations between the disorder potentials of neighboring islands ." ]
15,265
15,265
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: suppression of the low - energy part of bremsstrahlung from ultrarelativistic electrons passing through an amorphous scattering medium is the celebrated lpm - effect @xcite , named after landau and pomeranchuk who predicted it qualitatively @xcite , and migdal @xcite who provided an accurate theory for bremsstrahlung in a semi - infinite uniform medium . it has also been studied for finite - thickness targets @xcite , and for the opposite limit of thin target , which is of intrinsic interest @xcite . the theoretical predictions were accurately tested experimentally only within the last two decades @xcite , and the theoretical and experimental state of the art is reviewed in @xcite . a natural further step , both for practice and for theory , is to study composite targets . one of the simplest configurations thereof is a sequence of thin plates with a gap between them comparable to the photon formation length @xmath1 the latter quantity depends on the electron energy @xmath2 and photon energy @xmath0 in the window covered by the detector , @xmath3 standing for the electron mass . the problem of structured target as applied to the gamma - quantum emission , was first discussed by blankenbecler @xcite , who treated it at the basis of the model for multiple scattering devised in @xcite . subsequently , other authors @xcite extended their formalisms to handle this problem . an experimental verification of the existence of interference effects in bremsstrahlung on compound targets has recently been undertaken at cern @xcite . it was emphasized @xcite that high electron energy allows achieving macroscopic values for the photon formation length ( [ l_f - def ] ) , and thereby study its manifestations simply by tuning the distance between the scattering plates by a micrometer screw . but even for cern energies , @xmath4 gev , the coefficient in eq . ( [ l_f - def ] ) amounts only @xmath5 m , wherefore to make @xmath6 practically macroscopic ( @xmath7 mm ) , one needs to consider sufficiently small photon energies compared to @xmath2 , which then renders the problem essentially classical . at the same time , condition @xmath8 can be safely fulfilled , wherewith the contribution from transition radiation may be neglected . the experiment @xcite conducted at such conditions favored the theory @xcite , but also found some departures from it , and , surprisingly , from other theoretical predictions , which were expected to be more accurate . to clarify the origin of remaining discrepancies , it may be instructive to recollect underlying assumptions for the theories at the market . it is fair to say that blankenbecler and drell @xcite in essence extended landau and pomeranchuk s approach @xcite to cover the case of finite - thickness target , and incorporate quantum effects . at that , a simplified model of scattering in a medium was adopted , in which transverse dimensions of the target random field exceeded that of the electron wave packet , allowing to exactly integrate over electron impact parameters and to reduce the photon emission amplitude to an integral over particle trajectory , like in classical mechanics . a strong simplification was made then , in the spirit of @xcite , by replacing the medium average of an oscillatory integrand by the corresponding oscillatory function of averaged variables . that yielded the angle - integral spectrum in the form of a double time integral , which for most cases of interest had to be computed numerically . along these lines , blankenbecler @xcite evaluated the spectrum of radiation on @xmath9 plates , and discovered an additional maximum , or shoulder " in the region where the gap width becomes commensurable with the radiation coherence length . the approach of blankenbecler and drell has the merit of being simple and qualitatively correct . however , it suffers from a lack of accuracy due to the oversimplified averaging ( the neglect of fluctuations ) , which may be essential for comparison with experiments . an attempt to improve it was undertaken in blankenbecler s later paper @xcite , where a correlation of the amplitude and the phase of the integrand in the double time integral was taken into account , while other fluctuations were neglected , as before . as we will show , however , the correction so evaluated improves the accuracy only for the case of weak scattering in the plates , whilst in the opposite case of strong ( non - dipole ) scattering , in which interference effects are actually the strongest , this correction is rather counterproductive . almost simultaneously with @xcite , zakharov @xcite advanced with a calculation of the lpm effect in finite targets including proper averaging . it was built upon techniques originally developed for particle physics , notably the impact parameter representation . the merit of the latter is that it naturally invokes fourier transforms of scattering - angle distribution functions , which from solution of the kinetic equation express as simple exponentials of the fourier - transformed scattering differential cross - section . the main attention in papers @xcite was payed to a single finite - thickness target , while for structured target , the results were presented only graphically . zakharov noticed that the interference features in his calculated spectrum were less pronounced than those in @xcite , albeit attributed that to the crudeness of the blankenbecler - drell model for scattering medium , rather than to an oversimplification of their averaging procedure . shortly after , baier and katkov @xcite proposed a technique which allowed them to handle the case of @xmath9 scattering plates analytically . to this end , an alternative form of the double time integral representation for the radiation spectrum was adopted , and radiation spectra for @xmath9 plates were calculated by mathematical induction , assuming all the plates to be identical , equidistant , and the scattering angle distributions in them to be gaussian . the influence of the transition radiation was taken into account too , which can be valuable for lower - energy experiments . baier and katkov ultimately restricted their analysis to the case of plates infinitesimally thin compared to the gap width , and demonstrated that instead of one maximum , the radiation spectrum features a sequence of maxima and minima of decreasing amplitude . the common drawback shared by all the abovementioned approaches is that the resulting expressions for the radiation spectrum are rather unwieldy , and relations of the spectral features with physical parameters in the problem remain obscure . what is more serious , however , is that it led to a number of qualitative controversies in the literature , the most noticeable among which are the following : * it was suggested in @xcite that the position of the greatest spectral maximum corresponds to a situation when the photon formation length ( [ l_f - def ] ) matches the distance between the plate centres . but in that case , the resonance condition ought to involve an additional factor @xmath10 , as in coherent bremsstrahlung ( see @xcite ) . however , therewith it would definitely contradict the experiment @xcite . * in the integral expressing the radiation spectrum , the oscillating function typically has the argument @xmath11 , where @xmath12 is the electron s lorentz factor , and @xmath13 the radiation angle . the use of the latter expression suggests that for the distance @xmath14 between the plate centers , the main spectral maximum should be located at @xmath15 involving factor @xmath10 , as expected , but also a denominator @xmath16 , which might compensate it . practically , though , it is not a priori obvious , with respect to which direction the radiation angles should be counted , and what are their typical values . if one estimates them as @xmath17 , where @xmath18 is the rms scattering angle in the plates @xcite , then for @xmath19 the compensation between the @xmath10 factor and the denominator can be significant . but numerically , such estimates still contradict the experimental findings @xcite . * concerning the comparative strength of the contributions from the enhancement region and the suppression region at low @xmath0 , it is unobvious whether their integrated effect must be zero , as suggested in @xcite , or the suppression must dominate in the total energy losses , as one might anticipate from the migdal s theory @xcite of radiation in a thick target , where no enhancement manifests itself in the spectrum at all . in the absence of cogent explanation for those controversies , the state of the theory can hardly be regarded as satisfactory . besides that , it is becoming desirable further to consider the case of plates of unequal thickness , and to fully scrutinize the role of non - gaussian ( coulomb ) tails in scattering , insofar as approaches of baier and katkov , as well as blankenbecler and drell rested on gaussian description of scattering . given rather fundamental significance of the present problem , it makes sense at present to reappraise its theoretical treatment . in this paper we shall derive physically more transparent representations for the radiation spectrum , which will help clarify the matter as a whole , and at the same time improve the numerical accuracy . to simplify the problem , we will consider the case of two _ thin _ scattering plates ( foils ) , which allows avoiding double time integral representations for the radiation spectrum . we will also limit ourselves to classical electrodynamics , and neglect the transition radiation , which are good approximations for the performed experiments @xcite . on the other hand , we will investigate in more detail the influence of coulomb corrections . to alleviate the connection between the theory and the experiment , we introduce appropriate visibilities of the interference pattern . we will be able to resolve the controversies alluded above , and to correct abundant numerical errors existing in the literature . ultimately , we compare our predictions with the recent experimental data , and show that there is no significant discrepancy between the experiment and the theory . in classical electrodynamics , the spectral - angular energy distribution of radiation ( with vector @xmath20 marking the direction of photon emission ) expresses in a known way through the charged particle trajectory @xmath21 , @xmath22 @xcite : @xmath23}\frac{d}{dt } \frac{\bm{n}\times\bm{v}(t)}{1-\bm{n}\cdot \bm{v}(t ) } \right|^2,\ ] ] @xmath24 being the electron charge . for our present study , it will suffice to consider the simplest case when the electron experiences 2 abrupt scatterings , at instants @xmath25 and @xmath26 : @xmath27 integration over the time in eq . ( [ init - t - int ] ) trivially yields [ eq2 ] @xmath28,\label{expand - sum - sq - j}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath29 @xmath30 @xmath31 eq . ( [ expand - sum - sq - ja ] ) implies that if scatterings are well separated , the spectral radiation amplitude can be viewed as a sum of spectral amplitudes of radiation at single scatterings ( with a distance- and @xmath0-dependent phase shift @xmath32 between them ) . that may be conceived as the absence of effects of temporarily nonequilibrium proper field on the radiation amplitude level . however , observed in practice is the radiation intensity , which is proportional to the amplitude square . it differs from a sum of intensities on separate plates , engaging certain dependence on @xmath0 through the cosine of the phase shift between the scatterings . an important generic property of eq . ( [ expand - sum - sq - j ] ) is that the @xmath0-integral of the interference term therein strictly vanishes : @xmath33 by virtue of the relation @xmath34,\ ] ] and strictly non - zero value of the argument of the @xmath35-function for @xmath36 . the absence of interference in the total radiative energy loss at successive random scatterings has a simple physical reason : equivalently , it can be expressed as a _ time _ integral of the particle acceleration squared , in which time - separated scatterings obviously give non - interfering contributions @xcite : @xmath37 hence , if a suppression occurs in one region of the spectrum ( typically at lowest @xmath0 where it is associated with the lpm effect ) , it should be accompanied by a commensurable _ enhancement _ in some other region ( which is natural to call the anti - lpm effect ) . the established property is undoubtedly general and must hold as well for a number of scatterings greater than 2 . but it may contradict our experience that in a target with @xmath35-correlated scatterings , interference effects to the spectrum are purely suppressive , and there is seemingly no enhancement region at all @xcite . the contradiction is resolved if one takes into account that in condensed matter , distances between atoms are very short indeed , being usually far shorter than photon formation length . specifically , if we consider inequality @xmath38 where _ quantum _ arguments stipulate that @xmath39 , condition ( [ aa - gg - lf ] ) is fulfilled already at @xmath40 mev . in the latter ( quite ubiquitous ) case , the radiation spectrum reaches its quantum end at @xmath41 sooner than the radiation enhancement can develop . therefore , the spectral enhancement has no room to develop , and the suppression dominates both locally and globally @xcite . one could imagine that for gaseous targets , where distances between atoms are much greater than @xmath42 , the situation might change , but in the latter case , it is essential that @xmath43 should be regarded as a random variable . we will return to effects of randomization of @xmath43 in sec . [ sec : randomization ] , and demonstrate that the anti - lpm effect still manifests itself on a scale of photon formation length comparable with the range of _ anti_-correlation , which is of order of atomic size , again . meanwhile , we will concentrate on studying the case of radiation on two scattering foils with definite and macroscopic separation . before we proceed , however , there is another observation worth making . for bremsstrahlung in a sufficiently thin layer of substance , a fair approximation is the smallness of scattering angles ( dipole limit ) , when @xmath44 . in that case , the structure of currents ( [ j21-def])([j32-def ] ) appreciably simplifies . linearizing @xmath45 in @xmath46 and @xmath47 in @xmath48 , integrating over radiation angles , and averaging ( [ expand - sum - sq - j ] ) over scattering angles @xmath49 , @xmath50 yields @xmath51 with @xmath52 @xmath53 , and @xmath54 . since in most cases , successive scatterings are not causally connected , the correlator in ( [ g ] ) reduces to a product of mean scattering angles : @xmath55 for amorphous targets , mean deflection angles are obviously zero , wherefore the whole interference in the spectrum in this approximation vanishes . to preserve the interference effects between the targets , one thus needs either to render both scatterings asymmetric are challenging to manufacture . more compact deflectors could be created with the aid of lasers , as proposed in @xcite , or bent crystals . ] , or to arrange _ non - dipole _ conditions for radiation in the amorphous target , which may be simpler to bring into practice , and will be the subject of our study in what follows . to make our presentation self - contained , before addressing interference effects in a composite target , let us recapitulate the properties of bremsstrahlung on a single amorphous foil . this section gives the account of relevant formulae , highlighting the differences between gaussian and molire averaging procedures , as well as between frameworks of different authors . we will also propose two our own recipes for incorporating coulomb corrections , which give a reasonable balance between precision and simplicity for the addressed case . radiation spectrum at scattering to a definite angle of arbitrary size ( which is small by absolute value , but may be sizable compared with the typical radiation angle @xmath56 ) expresses by an integral ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) @xmath57 where @xmath58 small - angle expansion of ( [ f - def ] ) can be obtained as @xmath59 series ( [ f - dipole - series ] ) has finite ( actually , unit ) convergence radius , which is natural in view of the presence in ( [ f - def ] ) of the structure @xmath60 . the large - angle asymptotics of ( [ f - def ] ) is logarithmic : @xmath61 the logarithm here stems from the fact that although for a large - angle scattering , the radiation cones from the initial and final electron lines are well separated , the region between them is filled by an enhanced radiation , owing to the interference between the cones . it is integration over this inter - jet domain which gives rise to the large logarithm in ( [ f - la ] ) . ( a ) green solid curve , @xmath62 [ eq . ( [ fsigma - change - var ] ) or ( [ k1 ^ 2gauss ] ) ] ; red dashed curve , @xmath63 [ eq . ( [ f - def ] ) or eq . ( [ fb(t)=f(sigma2 ) ] ) ] ; red dot - dashed curve , the corrected blankenbecler - drell approximation ( [ ftilde - blankenbecler - thintarget ] ) . ( b ) red curve ( upper ) ; molire averaging for gold , blue curve , molire averaging for carbon ; dashed curve , gaussian averaging by eq . ( [ highland - approx ] ) . ] eqs . ( [ i1 ] ) , ( [ f - def ] ) may be used to derive radiation spectrum in a thin layer of substance [ under condition when a target thickness is much smaller than the photon formation length ( [ l_f - def ] ) in the considered range of @xmath0 ] . to this end , ( [ i1 ] ) must be averaged with the appropriate distribution in scattering angles in the target @xcite . in the simplest approximation , this distribution can be taken to be gaussian . averaging over scattering angles with the gaussian distribution with rms scattering angle @xmath18 , @xmath65 one gets @xmath66 where @xmath67 inserting here ( [ f - dipole - series ] ) , and integrating termwise yields @xmath68 with @xmath69 . series ( [ f - aver - series ] ) diverges for any finite @xmath70 ( not surprisingly since it was derived by integrating a series beyond its convergence domain ) ; nonetheless , the sequence of its terms may be used as an asymptotic expansion . the first two terms in eq . ( [ f - aver - series ] ) are @xmath71 note that the coefficient at the leading - order term is the same as in ( [ f - dipole ] ) , but the coefficient at the next - to - leading order term is twice greater . to obtain large-@xmath70 asymptotics of @xmath62 , it is advantageous to change in ( [ fsigma ] ) the integration variable to @xmath72 : @xmath73 the remaining integral in ( [ fsigma - change - var ] ) is a bounded function , ranging from 0 to 1 . at large @xmath70 , this term vanishes due to the pre - factor @xmath74 , so the corresponding asymptotics of @xmath75 is determined by that of macdonald function at the origin : @xmath76 . employing this in ( [ fsigma - change - var ] ) , we get @xcite @xmath77 it is instructive to compare result ( [ i1sigma])([fsigma ] ) with representations derived within frameworks of blankenbecler and drell @xcite , and baier and katkov @xcite , under the same conditions of ( geometrically ) thin target and gaussian scattering . blankenbecler s result [ see @xcite , eq . ( 30 ) ] for the thin - target limit reads [ f - blankenbecler - thintarget ] @xmath78 evaluation of this integral yields @xmath79 where @xmath63 is given by eq . ( [ f - def ] ) . hence , the correspondence between @xmath80 and @xmath70 is @xmath81 and the approximation of blankenbecler consists in substituting the rms scattering angle to the non - averaged ( fixed - scattering - angle ) radiation spectrum : @xmath82 this correspondence is what one could expect , given that blankenbecler and drell @xcite , similarly to landau and pomeranchuk @xcite , replaced an average of an oscillatory function in the integrand of a double time integral by the oscillatory function with average amplitude and phase . as is seen from comparison of asymptotics ( [ fsigma - la ] ) and ( [ f - la ] ) , however , such a simple - minded replacement deviates from the exact result only by @xmath83 . yet another possible source of inaccuracy , though , may stem from the fact that for numerical calculations , blankenbecler adopted relation @xmath84 ( with @xmath85 the target thickness and @xmath86 the radiation length ) . the coefficient in ( [ blankenbecler - q2def ] ) differs by a constant factor @xmath87 from that in the rossi formula @xmath88 accordingly , blankenbecler defined the scaled target thickness [ see @xcite , eq . ( 10.1 ) , @xcite , eq . ( 16 ) ] @xmath89 consistent with the correspondence rule ( [ t = sigma2/6 ] ) . but physically , the coefficient in the relation between @xmath90 and @xmath91 should vary logarithmically with @xmath85 . more accurate description of multiple coulomb scattering will be furnished in sec . [ subsec:1platemoliere ] . in @xcite , blankenbecler derived a correction to eq . ( [ f - blankenbecler - thintarget - int ] ) [ see @xcite , eq . ( 109 ) ] : @xmath92 ^ 2}-1\bigg).\end{aligned}\ ] ] at small @xmath80 , i.e. , small @xmath70 , it rather neatly reproduces the next - to - leading order term in the exact small - angle expansion ( [ fsigma - dipole ] ) , provided one uses here the correspondence ( [ t = sigma2/6 ] ) : @xmath93 however , at large @xmath70 ( or @xmath80 ) , approximation ( [ ftilde - blankenbecler - thintarget ] ) fails by a factor of 2 [ see fig . [ fig : f](b ) , red dot - dashed curve ] , and can not be regarded as tenable there . baier and katkov s result for the case of one foil @xcite reads missing in @xcite . ] @xmath94 ^ 2}\right\}.\ ] ] evaluation of this integral re - obtains expression ( [ fsigma ] ) , once one identifies @xmath95 and @xmath96 baier and katkov stated their own prescription for computation of @xmath97 , which will be compared with our prescription in the next subsection . for very thin targets , the distribution in scattering angles can significantly deviate from a gaussian , while in the extreme @xmath98 , it must turn proportional to the differential cross - section of single scattering . to be more accurate , one may utilize the general ( molire ) solution of the kinetic equation in terms of a fourier - bessel integral @xcite : @xmath99},\ ] ] where @xmath100 is the scattering differential cross - section . it may be noted that at substantial thicknesses , ( [ moliere - distr - def ] ) is approximable by a gaussian plus corrections @xcite , but we will not resort to such approximations here , dealing directly with the exact integral representation ( [ moliere - distr - def ] ) . according to eqs . ( [ expand - sum - sq - j ] ) , ( [ j21-def ] ) , @xmath101 where the last integral effectively extends over the transverse plane of small angle differences . since the two terms in parentheses in ( [ 80 ] ) only differ by a shift in the @xmath102 plane , it may be expedient to expand them into fourier integrals , so that the angular shift converts to a phase factor : @xmath103 considering that @xmath104 is the photon s transverse momentum , @xmath105 can be interpreted as the photon s impact parameter relative to the parent electron . inserting ( [ wf - angle - wf - imp - par ] ) to eq . ( [ 80 ] ) obtains @xmath106 ^ 2\left|1-e^{i(\bm{v}_1-\bm{v}_2)\cdot \bm{r } } \right|^2\nonumber\\ & \,&\label{40a}\\ & = & \frac{4e^2}{\pi\gamma^2}\int_0^{\infty } dr r k_1 ^ 2(r/\gamma)\left[1-j_0\left(\chi r\right)\right].\label{k1 ^ 2(1-j)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it can be checked that evaluation of the integral in ( [ k1 ^ 2(1-j ) ] ) reproduces the explicit form ( [ i1 ] ) , ( [ f - def ] ) . the reader familiar with the light - cone formalism @xcite will recognize @xmath107 as being ( the low-@xmath0 approximation for ) the electron - photon component of the electron wave function , with the vector index accounting for the photon polarization . in this spirit , @xmath108 amounts the complete wave function after electron scattering to a definite angle , and for @xmath109 this wave function differs from zero . correspondingly , the integral of its modulus square gives the total probability of emission of a photon with energy @xmath0 , i.e. , the radiation spectrum . interpretation of this kind may be noteworthy for intuitive understanding of the final results , albeit in this paper we will refrain from using it technically , and adhere to the standard formulation of classical electrodynamics . to proceed , when expression ( [ k1 ^ 2(1-j ) ] ) is averaged over scattering angles with a gaussian distribution ( [ gauss - distr ] ) , it becomes @xmath110 on the other hand , averaging with molire distribution ( [ moliere - distr - def ] ) leads to the form @xmath111}\right\},\ ] ] essentially coinciding with the result of zakharov @xcite ( see also @xcite ) . it is also in the spirit of glauber form @xcite for scattering of a high - energy composite quantum system . ( it is not crucial that in our case the scattering is multiple , since it conserves the impact parameter , anyway . ) to use formula ( [ k1 ^ 2(1-edsigma ) ] ) , we need further to specify the differential cross - section of scattering on one atom . the simplest model thereof is @xmath112 where @xmath113 , and @xmath114 , with @xmath115 playing the role of the atomic screening radius . inserting ( [ dsigma - model ] ) to ( [ k1 ^ 2(1-edsigma ) ] ) gives @xmath116}\right\}\!.\ ] ] at practice , parameter @xmath117 , so for any value of @xmath118 , for description of radiation it is always legitimate to expand @xmath119 in vicinity of the origin : @xmath120 . to determine the precise value of @xmath121 , one may note that in the limit of small @xmath85 , @xmath122 on the other hand , by definition of the radiation length ( in the approximation of complete screening ) , that must equal in eq . ( [ 43x0 ] ) . ] @xmath123 parameter @xmath121 can thus be related to phenomenological parameters @xmath86 and @xmath124 via @xmath125 in this paper , our approach will be simply to employ relation ( [ x0-rho1 ] ) in eq . ( [ exp - k1 ] ) . the factor @xmath118 in the exponent can be expressed in terms of the ratio @xmath126 : @xmath127 therewith , we have only one adjustable parameter @xmath128 ( instead of two , for radiation with and without atom ionization or excitation ) . that parameter depends on the radiation length , which may include all the molecular binding and crystal structure effects . at practice , though , @xmath86 itself is often inferred from calculations by formulas for bremsstrahlung on a free atom , neglecting the inter - atomic effects @xcite . utilizing the commonly used ( calculated @xcite ) values for the radiation length , for gold we obtain @xmath129 , @xmath130 , whereas for carbon , @xmath131 , @xmath132 . note that if the screening radius is estimated from relation @xmath133 , for gold it amounts @xmath134 , while for carbon , @xmath135 . the presented estimates for @xmath115 are generally greater than those following from the prescription used by zakharov @xcite @xmath136 for gold , eq . ( [ zakh - a ] ) gives @xmath137 , while for carbon , @xmath138 , the latter deviating distinctly from our above estimate . fortunately , though , the sensitivity to this parameter is only logarithmic . [ fig : f](b ) overlays the predictions of eq . ( [ exp - k1 ] ) for carbon and for gold . along with those , we plot formfactor ( [ fsigma ] ) for gaussian averaging with the rms scattering angle evaluated by the widely used empirical formula - dependence of the coefficient were obtained @xcite , but to keep the treatment simple , and expose numerical differences between the approaches , we will confine ourselves here to parameterization ( [ highland - approx ] ) . ] @xcite @xmath139 formula ( [ highland - approx ] ) is known to work with an accuracy better than 10% for @xmath140 . from fig . [ fig : f](b ) we conclude that for bremsstrahlung on one plate , the agreement is good in the whole range of @xmath85 , including @xmath141 . that is natural since it can be shown that under some approximations , formula ( [ highland - approx ] ) can actually be derived from the rigorous representation ( [ exp - k1 ] ) ( see appendix [ appendix ] ) . correspondence between values of rms scattering angle calculated by our eq . ( [ 51 ] ) and by baier and katkov s eq . ( [ bk - rms - prescription ] ) . red curve for carbon ; blue curve for gold . the auxiliary dashed line marks the diagonal @xmath142 . ] finally , our eq . ( [ 51 ] ) approximately accounting for coulomb corrections in multiple scattering can also be compared with the recipe of baier and katkov @xcite : @xmath143.\end{aligned}\ ] ] predictions of eq . ( [ 51 ] ) and ( [ bk - rms - prescription ] ) are confronted in fig . [ fig : rms ] , and are reasonably close , although some differences are perceptible . we are now in a position to address the case of two plates . in eq . ( [ expand - sum - sq - j ] ) , the first two terms are individual contributions from each plate , described by formulas of sec . [ sec:1plate ] , while the nontrivial third term of eq . ( [ expand - sum - sq - j ] ) involves the product of currents induced by scattering in different plates . hence , averaging of those currents over corresponding scattering angles proceeds independently : @xmath144 as was pointed out in the end of sec . [ sec:2scat ] , product ( [ av - prod = prod - av ] ) receives a suppression after integration over azimuthal directions of @xmath20 . therefore , it is reasonable to carry out the averaging in two steps : first , to average over azimuths of @xmath20 , which does not need a reference to a specific form of the ( axially - symmetric ) scattering angle distribution function . at the second step , one implements convolutions with specific angular distribution functions . granted that the currents entering eq . ( [ eq2 ] ) have similar structure , it suffices to consider a generic form @xmath145 where @xmath146 may equal @xmath147 or @xmath148 . averaging of expression ( [ j - def ] ) over azimuths of the scattering angle , say , wrt direction @xmath149 ( it makes no difference since ultimately all directions are to be integrated over ) proceeds as follows . decomposing @xmath146 into components parallel and orthogonal to @xmath149 , @xmath150 with @xmath151 , we compute the azimuthal average : @xmath152 now we can insert @xmath153 , and omit the component parallel to @xmath20 , which does not contribute to the vector product with @xmath20 appearing in eq . ( [ av - prod = prod - av ] ) . as a result , the azimuthally averaged radiation amplitude assumes the form @xmath154 with @xmath155 in the small - angle approximation , @xmath156 , @xmath157 , @xmath158 , @xmath159 , we obtain @xmath160[\gamma^{-2}+(\theta+\chi)^2]}}\right)\nonumber\\ & \equiv&\frac{1}{2(1+\theta^2)}-\frac{1 } { 4\theta^2}\!\left(\!1\!+\!\frac{\theta^2-x-1}{\sqrt{(x+1-\theta^2)^2 + 4\theta^2}}\!\right),\quad\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath161 . function ( [ j - scalar - def ] ) is everywhere positive . at small @xmath162 , it expands as @xmath163\!\!\bigg\}\nonumber\\ & \underset{\theta\ll 1}\simeq&\frac12-\frac1{2(1+x)^2}+\mathcal{o}(\theta^2),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath164 are legendre polynomials @xcite arising as coefficients in the expansion @xmath165 . before proceeding to averaging over moduli of scattering angles , i.e. , @xmath166 , it is also instructive to examine the asymptotics of @xmath167 as a function of @xmath166 . at small @xmath166 , @xmath168\,\ , \label{j - quadrupole - approx - a}\\ & \underset{x\ll1}\simeq&\frac{1}{(1+\theta^2)^3}x+\mathcal{o}(x^2).\label{j - quadrupole - approx}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here the leading term is proportional to @xmath169 , whereas in the dipole approximation the current is @xmath170 , but the latter contribution vanishes after azimuthal averaging [ see eq . ( [ g ] ) ] . thus , the leading term ( [ j - quadrupole - approx ] ) corresponds to a quadrupole " approximation . on the other hand , at large @xmath171 and fixed @xmath13 , @xmath172 factor @xmath173 here describes the radiation from the @xmath149 half - line alone . as for the radiation from the @xmath146 half - line , it is smeared by the azimuthal averaging , but in any case , the inter - jet region extends only out to polar angle @xmath174 . it is noteworthy that function @xmath167 features no enhancement around @xmath175 , which could be expected due to the presence of the @xmath146-jet . so , after the azimuthal averaging , the latter jet does not manifests itself as a peak . for @xmath176 , the radiation is suppressed because radiation amplitudes from @xmath149 and @xmath146 lines strongly cancel . ( a ) loglog plot of the azimuthally averaged electromagnetic current at one scattering , eq . ( [ j - scalar - def ] ) , for scattering angles @xmath177 , 0.3 , 1 , 3 , 6 , 10 , 15 ( solid curves , bottom to top ) . dashed curves , approximation ( [ j - quadrupole - approx ] ) ; ( b ) same for the gaussian - weighted azimuthally averaged electromagnetic current at one scattering , eq . ( [ j - scalar - av - chi ] ) . dashed curves , approximation ( [ g - small - sigma ] ) . dot - dashed curves , approximation ( [ gsigma - la ] ) . ] employing representation eq . ( [ approx - aver - j ] ) in eq . ( [ av - prod = prod - av ] ) , we have @xmath178 where @xmath179 and we invoked the identity @xmath180 . the minus sign in eq . ( [ av - g ] ) , i.e. , the negativity of interference between the currents , retraces to the general property of saturation of radiation . in eq . ( [ expand - sum - sq - j ] ) , though , factor ( [ interf - jj ] ) is multiplied by an @xmath0-dependent factor @xmath181 , and the corresponding product is yet to be integrated over polar radiation angles . given that @xmath181 is sign - alternating , the spectrum may then actually oscillate with the increase of @xmath182 , not only experience a suppression . combining with the previously computed bremsstrahlung contributions from individual plates , which are @xmath0-independent , we get @xmath183.\,\,\end{aligned}\ ] ] the dependence of function ( [ didomega - combined ] ) on @xmath182 is shown in fig . [ fig : exact - oscill ] . as anticipated , it exhibits an oscillatory behavior . oscillations of spectrum of the bremsstrahlung on two foils , computed for gaussian scattering - angle distribution functions with rms @xmath184 ( thin red curve ) , 1 ( yellow ) , 2 ( green ) , 5 ( blue ) . at @xmath185 , the spectrum must rise again , and reach the bethe - heitler constant value ( see sec . [ sec : plate - formfactor ] ) . ] to determine the magnitude and the phase of the oscillations , note that at @xmath186 , the integral in the last term of ( [ didomega - combined ] ) is dominated by the vicinity of the lower endpoint , and its evaluation with @xmath187 yields the asymptotics @xmath188.\,\,\end{aligned}\ ] ] according to this result , maxima of @xmath189 should appear at @xmath190 with @xmath124 integer , independently of shapes of distribution functions @xmath191 . that simple prediction is confirmed by fig . [ fig : exact - oscill ] . a suggestive geometrical interpretation for the rule ( [ secondary - max ] ) , in the spirit of wave optics , is that the maxima correspond to situations when the distance between the plates equals an integer number of full coherence lengths @xmath192 . concerning the main maximum ( which accounts for the bulk of the anti - lpm enhancement ) , however , there is no possibility to associate it with the case of unit wavelength shift as proposed in @xcite . for @xmath193 , of course , formula ( [ di - largelambda ] ) does not apply , but from the point of exact formula ( [ didomega - combined ] ) , the main maximum of @xmath194 emerges when in the integrand of the last term , the maximum of owes in particular to the factor @xmath195 , which is due to the cancellation of interference effects at small @xmath162 see the end of sec . [ sec:2scat ] . ] @xmath196 , achieved at some @xmath197 , coincides with the extremum of @xmath198 : @xmath199 whereat @xmath200 . this situation has to be discriminated from the case @xmath201 in eq . ( [ di - largelambda ] ) , where the existence of a maximum for @xmath202 is irrelevant because there are several oscillations within its width , and the region of dominant contribution shifts to the endpoint . in the latter case , the half - wavelength shift corresponds to a spectral _ minimum _ next to the main maximum . as opposed to that , case ( [ denom=1+theta^2 ] ) with the account of the denominator @xmath203 can be called the inclined half - length , which is numerically close to quarter - wavelength . it is worth stressing in this regard that although there is a denominator in relation ( [ denom=1+theta^2 ] ) depending on @xmath70 , but it obeys a relation @xmath204 . clearly , even at large @xmath70 , the contributing @xmath162 in eq . ( [ didomega - combined ] ) are @xmath205 , i.e. , @xmath206 with respect to the direction @xmath149 . therefore , the use of the in - medium coherence length @xcite @xmath207 in the resonance condition @xmath208 is _ unjustified_. in fact , employment of ( [ l - f - in - medium ] ) in application to the present problem led in @xcite to a large underestimate of the location of the first spectral maximum . finally , one must pay attention to the pronounced spectral minimum at @xmath209 , which must be associated with zero wavelength shift . this limit is known to correspond to a situation when the radiation amplitude completely factorizes from the scattering one , and so radiation on two plates becomes the same as on one plate with the aggregate thickness . such a relation may be not immediately transparent from eq . ( [ didomega - combined ] ) , although proves by straightforward integration ; we will also supply a simpler derivation thereof in sec . [ subsec : v0 ] . to deduce all the consequences from the averaging , let us now assume @xmath210 in ( [ av - g ] ) to be a gaussian weighting distribution ( [ gauss - distr ] ) . the averaging of @xmath167 with such a distribution simplifies after an integration by parts : @xmath211^{3/2}}.\qquad\label{j - scalar - av - chi}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the behavior of function ( [ j - scalar - av - chi ] ) is illustrated in fig . [ fig : j](b ) for several values of @xmath70 . it is largely similar to that of @xmath167 shown in fig . [ fig : j](a ) , but is smoother at @xmath212 , the latter property being natural inasmuch as the unit step function in ( [ j - largeangle - approx ] ) is smoothened out by the averaging over @xmath171 . numerically , eq . ( [ didomega - combined ] ) with entries ( [ fsigma - change - var ] ) , ( [ j - scalar - av - chi ] ) proves to be equivalent to eqs . ( 2.34 ) , ( 2.36 ) of @xcite under the correspondence rule ( [ b - sigma2 ] ) , although analytically , the equivalence of both approaches is challenging to verify . our representation seems to be better suited for the analytic study of @xmath70- and @xmath182-dependences . with its aid , we will now derive small- and large-@xmath70 asymptotics of function @xmath213 , which will be useful in what follows . at small @xmath70 , plugging expansion ( [ j - quadrupole - approx - a ] ) to eq . ( [ j - scalar - av - chi - a ] ) , and integrating termwise , we obtain @xmath214\label{g - small - sigma - series}\\ & \underset{\sigma\ll 1}{\simeq}&\sigma^2(1+\theta^2)^{-3}+\mathcal{o}(\sigma^4).\label{g - small - sigma}\end{aligned}\ ] ] similarly to eq . ( [ f - aver - series ] ) , expansion ( [ g - small - sigma - series ] ) diverges , but again , it remains sensible as an asymptotic series . its leading term ( [ g - small - sigma ] ) coincides with the asymptotics of non - averaged expression ( [ j - quadrupole - approx ] ) , granted that there the @xmath171-dependence factorizes . the behavior of approximation ( [ g - small - sigma ] ) is shown in fig . [ fig : j](b ) by dashed curves . on the other hand , at significant @xmath70 , it is legitimate to expand @xmath215 to taylor series in vicinity of point @xmath216 and integrate termwise : @xmath217^{3/2}}\nonumber\\ & \,&\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\times \left(1+\frac{\theta^2 - 1-x}{\sigma^2}\right)\nonumber\\ & = & \frac{1}{1+\theta^2}e^{-\frac{\theta^2 - 1}{\sigma^{2}}}\left(\frac12-\frac1{\sigma^2}\right)\nonumber\\ & \approx&\frac{1}{2(1+\theta^2)}e^{-\frac{1+\theta^2}{\sigma^{2}}}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] according to fig . [ fig : j](b ) ( dot - dashed curves ) , approximation ( [ gsigma - la ] ) works well for @xmath218 . at large @xmath70 and fixed @xmath162 , the exponential here tends to unity , and form ( [ j - largeangle - approx ] ) is retrieved . if instead of a gaussian we prefer to use molire weighting distribution ( [ moliere - distr - def ] ) , it may be more convenient to return to eq . ( [ expand - sum - sq - j ] ) for the radiation spectrum . in the last line of eq . ( [ expand - sum - sq - j ] ) , the product of currents consists of 4 terms , which have similar structure . it suffices to calculate only one of those , @xmath219,\end{aligned}\ ] ] while the other terms can be reconstructed by replacements @xmath220 or / and @xmath221 . changing the integration variable to @xmath222 , inserting representations ( [ wf - angle - wf - imp - par ] ) for the first factor in the first line of ( [ 89 ] ) , and a complex conjugate representation for the second factor , one brings it to the form of an integral over impact parameters : @xmath223 here @xmath224 may be regarded as green s function for a two - dimensional free schrdinger equation on the light front : @xmath225\!s_{\omega}\!\left(\bm{r}_1-\bm{r}_3,t_{21}\right)\!\theta(t_{21})\nonumber\\ = -i\delta(\bm{r}_1-\bm{r}_3)\delta(t_{21}),\qquad\end{aligned}\ ] ] and it evaluates in closed form : @xmath226.\ ] ] note that this function depends only on the difference between @xmath227 and @xmath228 , just as in ( [ didomega - combined ] ) the cosine depends , besides @xmath229 , only on the angle between @xmath149 and @xmath20 . restoring the rest of the interference terms by substitutions @xmath221 or @xmath220 , and combining them , we get @xmath230 convolving this with the molire distribution function , and integrating over azimuths of @xmath227 and @xmath228 , leads to the result @xmath231}\right\ } \nonumber\\ \times\int_0^{\infty } d \rho_3\rho_3 k_1(\rho_3 ) \left\{1-e^{-n_2l_2 \int d\sigma(\chi)[1-j_0(\rho_3\gamma\chi)]}\right\ } \nonumber\\ \times \cos\left(\frac{\rho_1 ^ 2+\rho_3 ^ 2}{4\omega}-\omega\right)j_1\left(\frac{\rho_1\rho_3}{2\omega}\right),\quad\end{aligned}\ ] ] where for convenience we rescaled the impact parameter variable to @xmath232 . note that after integration over the azimuth , the dependence only on the impact parameter difference is somewhat disguised . at large @xmath182 , upon approximations @xmath233 , @xmath234 , ( [ impact-2scat ] ) factorizes : @xmath235}\right\ } \nonumber\\ \times\int_0^{\infty } d \rho_3\rho_3 ^ 2 k_1(\rho_3 ) \left\{1-e^{-n_2l_2 \int d\sigma(\chi)[1-j_0(\rho_3\gamma\chi)]}\right\}.\,\,\end{aligned}\ ] ] this form proves to be equivalent to eq . ( [ di - largelambda ] ) , by virtue of the identity @xmath236}\right\}\quad\label{80a}\\ = \frac14\int d^2\chi \frac{dw_{\text{m}}}{d^2\chi } \int_0^{\infty } d \rho\rho^2 k_1(\rho ) \left[1-j_0(\rho\gamma\chi)\right]\nonumber\\ = \int d^2\chi \frac{dw_{\text{m}}}{d^2\chi } \left[\frac12-\frac1{2(1+x)^2}\right ] \equiv\left\langle g\right\rangle_{\text{m}}(0)\quad\end{aligned}\ ] ] [ cf . ( [ g(0 ) ] ) ] . the spectrum of radiation on two plates that we have evaluated , even under the simplification of a negligible plate thicknesses , is a function of 3 variables : @xmath237 , @xmath237 , and @xmath182 . in limiting cases , though , it reduces to simpler functions , which will be scrutinized below . the visibility of the low-@xmath0 dip , eq . ( [ v - through - f ] ) . ( a ) for gaussian averaging and arbitrary @xmath237 , @xmath238 . ( b ) for gaussian averaging and @xmath239 . solid black curve , exact expression ( [ visibility ] ) . dashed black curve , its asymptotics ( [ v - largesigma ] ) . purple dot - dashed curve , the visibility in the blankenbecler - drell approximation . ( c ) for molire averaging . blue curve , carbon ; red curve , gold ; black dashed curve , gaussian averaging with rms scattering angle computed by formula ( [ highland - approx ] ) . ] for experimental tests , it is imperative to estimate visibilities of gross features of the spectrum , and find their optimum by choosing appropriate foil materials and their thicknesses . the interference term reaches its largest absolute value at @xmath209 . therefore , it is natural to consider the characteristic quantity @xmath240 adopting the terminology from optics , this may be called the visibility of the low-@xmath0 dip . with the aid of eq ( [ didomega - combined ] ) , it can be explicitly written as [ visibility ] @xmath241 as we already mentioned at the end of sec . [ subsec : aggr - spectr ] , here the spectrum must reduce to that from a single plate of aggregate thickness . this can now be proven rather easily , based on the impact parameter representation ( [ impact-2scat ] ) . there , @xmath242 , and terms @xmath243 , @xmath244 cancel with some of the interference terms , leaving @xmath245 . thereby , @xmath246 indeed reduces to the form @xmath247 at small @xmath70 , @xmath248 i.e. , essentially it is proportional to the minimal among @xmath249 , @xmath250 . at large @xmath237 , @xmath238 , @xmath251 thus , in principle , asymptotically @xmath246 tends to @xmath252 . that is natural , inasmuch as radiation at one plate saturates as a function of its thickness , and hence the radiation at any two strongly scattering foils must be about twice stronger than on one of them . but practically , such a saturation is achieved only logarithmically , and is too remote , so the second term in eq . ( [ v - largesigma ] ) is usually significant . the behavior of ( [ visibility ] ) and asymptotic approximation ( [ v - largesigma ] ) is illustrated in fig . [ fig : v](b ) by black solid and dashed curves . for comparison , the purple dot - dashed curve also shows the corresponding result for blankenbecler s theory , when in eq . ( [ v - through - f ] ) @xmath75 is replaced by @xmath253 . notably , that curve intersects with the exact result at @xmath254 , and keeps close to it at greater @xmath70 . but at @xmath255 the difference is relatively large . it is also interesting to note that the blankenbecler - drell prediction for @xmath246 is lower than the exact one , i.e. , the neglect of fluctuations leads to an underestimation of the interference effect in radiation . that means that under the conditions of cancellation of dipole contributions in the interference , fluctuations help creating uncompensated contributions . likewise , it is useful to compare in this limit the predictions of gaussian and molire averaging [ see fig . [ fig : v](c ) ] . it appears that the gaussian averaging prediction becomes inaccurate at @xmath256 , just where the accuracy of approximation ( [ highland - approx ] ) itself becomes worse than 10% . in the opposite limit of large @xmath0 , according to eq . ( [ di - largelambda ] ) , the visibility may be characterized by the ratio @xmath257 at small @xmath70 , this quantity behaves as @xmath258 whereas at large @xmath237 , @xmath238 , it logarithmically decreases : @xmath259 the dependence of @xmath260 on both parameters @xmath237 and @xmath238 is shown in fig . [ fig : vinfty](a ) . its maximum is achieved at @xmath261 [ see fig . [ fig : vinfty](b ) ] . there , the function still does not exceed 0.7 . yet , in ( [ di - largelambda ] ) it is multiplied by @xmath262 with @xmath263 , hence , actual visibility in the high-@xmath0 region is on the level of a few percent , demanding formidable measurement statistics . for comparison , in fig . [ fig : vinfty](b ) by dot - dashed curve we show the behavior of eq . ( [ v_infty - def ] ) after replacement of averaged radiation formfactors by non - averaged functions of averaged argument : @xmath264 which we presume to correspond to blankenbecler - drell approximation . function ( [ 89 ] ) intersects with the exact result at @xmath265 , and keeps close to it at greater @xmath70 , but at @xmath266 the difference is rather large . same as fig . [ fig : v ] , for visibility of secondary minima and maxima , eq . ( [ v_infty - def ] ) . the dashed curve in ( b ) obeys eq . ( [ vinfty - asympt ] ) for @xmath239 . ] fig . [ fig : vinfty](c ) compares predictions of eq . ( [ v_infty - def ] ) when averaging is performed with the molire distribution , by eqs . ( [ 80a ] ) , ( [ exp - k1 ] ) ( the blue solid curve for carbon , the red solid curve for gold ) , and with gaussian distribution , eqs . ( [ j - scalar - av - chi ] ) and ( [ fsigma - change - var ] ) ( black dashed curve ) . there is a distinct difference between the predictions around the maximum , which is achieved at @xmath267 , i.e. , @xmath268 . the sign of this difference tells that in the region of substantial photon energies , the account of fluctuations of scattering leads to a lowering of the interference effect in radiation , contrary to the situation with @xmath246 in the previous section . that admits rather simple explanation : fluctuations always tend to suppress the radiation , but at @xmath209 , where the interference effect itself is suppressive , that worked towards increasing the effect , whereas in the large-@xmath0 region it just lowers both amplitudes @xmath269 and @xmath270 in the interference term . for a generic case , integral ( [ didomega - combined ] ) can only be evaluated numerically . but for limiting cases ( [ j - quadrupole - approx ] ) and ( [ j - largeangle - approx ] ) , the integration is analytically manageable . for completeness , in the remainder of this section , we will collect formulae for the corresponding limiting spectral shapes , and compare them with results of @xcite , obtained for same limits , at @xmath271 . to begin with , consider the case when scattering angles in both of the foils are small . inserting ( [ g - small - sigma ] ) to ( [ didomega - combined ] ) , we get @xmath272 where @xmath273 and @xmath274 is the quadrupole - quadrupole interference function . the latter function achieves its first ( anti - lpm ) maximum at @xmath275 ( see fig . [ fig : g - qq ] ) . according to eqs . ( [ qq ] ) , ( [ g - qq - def ] ) , the visibility of spectral fringes is @xmath276 . it must be noted that our function ( [ g - qq - def ] ) appears to differ from function @xmath277 obtained in @xcite , eq . the comparison of those functions in fig . [ fig : g - qq ] shows ample differences except in the limits @xmath278 and @xmath279 . we believe therefore that the corresponding result of @xcite is in error . ( while contributions @xmath280 from @xmath281 and @xmath282 must cancel ) . we did not follow this procedure , wherefore we can not indicate the source of the error . ] the next case to be considered is when scattering angles on each of the foils are @xmath283 . inserting eq . ( [ gsigma - la ] ) to ( [ didomega - combined ] ) , obtains @xmath284,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath285\nonumber\\ & = & e^{-\xi}\cos\omega-\mathfrak{re}\left[(1+\xi+i\omega)e_1\left(\xi+i\omega\right)\right],\nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath286 the exponential integral . term @xmath287 in the argument of @xmath288 is negligible if @xmath289 ; then our eq . ( [ ll ] ) reduces to eq . ( 2.45 ) of @xcite . this limiting function has an anti - lpm maximum at @xmath290 ( see fig . [ fig : gll ] ) , which agrees with the conclusions of blankenbecler - drell and baier - katkov that the maximum is achieved at @xmath291.m . ] however , for small @xmath182 , term @xmath292 in the argument of @xmath288 is crucial . there , @xmath293 , wherewith @xmath294 corrections proportional to @xmath292 , especially in the prefactor of the logarithm in ( [ g_ll - approx ] ) , can be important at moderately small @xmath295 . neglecting @xmath296 or @xmath297 under the logarithm sign in ( [ g_ll - approx ] ) , we arrive correspondingly at eq . ( 2.42 ) or ( 2.43 ) of @xcite . in fig . [ fig : gll ] we compare the behavior of function ( [ e1 ] ) ( solid curve ) , with that of approximation ( [ g_ll - approx ] ) ( dotted curve ) , and of an approximation resulting when we put in eq . ( [ e1 ] ) @xmath298 ( dashed curve ) . the latter two approximations are seen to work in complementary regions . interference function for the case of double small - angle - scattering . solid curve , eq . ( [ g - qq - def ] ) close to the red curve of fig . ( [ fig : exact - oscill ] ) . blue dot - dashed curve , baier - katkov s function @xmath299 @xcite . ] finally , we examine the case when one of the foils scatters weakly , whereas another one scatters the electrons through angles @xmath283 . inserting the corresponding limiting forms ( [ g - small - sigma ] ) and ( [ gsigma - la ] ) to ( [ didomega - combined ] ) , we arrive at @xmath300\right\},\ ] ] where @xmath301 this function has a maximum at @xmath302 . notably , there is no logarithmic dependence in the interference term , and its amplitude does not depend on @xmath238 , which corresponds to strict saturation of radiation . correspondingly , the visibility in this case is @xmath303 , i.e. , even lower than for the case of double small - angle scattering . interference function for the case of double large - angle - scattering . solid curve , eq . ( [ e1 ] ) close to the blue curve of fig . [ fig : exact - oscill ] . dashed curve , @xmath304 . dotted curve , asymptotics ( [ g_ll - approx ] ) . ] hitherto we presumed negligible thicknesses of both targets , but at a sufficiently large @xmath0 , finite target thickness must inevitably show up . indeed , when @xmath305 decreases down to the value of @xmath85 , the target geometry gets resolved . thereat , the radiation spectrum must additionally rise from the doubled but logarithmically saturated values to the completely saturation - free bethe - heitler value . in principle , our framework requires only minor modification to reflect the mentioned rise : it suffices to multiply the radiation spectrum computed above by the plate formfactor , which smoothly interpolates between unity at @xmath306 and migdal s function @xmath307 at @xmath308 ( specifically , @xmath309 ) . the implementation of such an interpolation , however , is beyond our scope in the present paper . the best way to test our equations is to confront them with experimental data . measurements of bremsstrahlung spectra from 178 gev electrons on a sequence of plates were performed in @xcite with two equal 26 @xmath310 m thick golden foils ( @xmath311 mm ) separated by a gap of variable width . the scattering strength parameter for one such a foil , according to eq . ( [ highland - approx ] ) , estimates as @xmath312 , so the scattering angles there were rather large . in fig . [ fig : experiment ] we compare predictions of our eq . ( [ didomega - combined ] ) and eq . ( [ impact-2scat ] ) with the experiment @xcite , letting @xmath43 be equal to the distance between plate centres , @xmath14 . the agreement may be regarded as fair . some possible experimental inaccuracies at @xmath313 mev were discussed in @xcite , but they do not seem to cause large deviations . since our gaussian and molire averaging procedures give numerically close results , and on the other hand , it was found in sec . [ sec:1plate ] that our prescriptions for scattering parameters are close to those of baier - katkov and zakharov , we expect that baier - katkov s and zakharov s predictions for the radiation spectrum must be in agreement with the experiment @xcite , too , even though the qualitative inferences based on the baier - katkov theory seem to disagree with it . shapes of spectral oscillations for conditions of experiment @xcite ( @xmath314 m ) . ( a ) @xmath315 m ; ( b ) @xmath316 m ; ( c ) @xmath317 m . dark blue curves , gaussian averaging , with @xmath70 calculated by eq . ( [ highland - approx ] ) . green curves , molire averaging for gold . ] as for comparison of experimental results with predictions of blankenbecler , recalling our results of sec . [ sec : analysis ] , it should be noticed that the use of plates with scattering strength @xmath318 closely corresponds to the point of intersection of visibilities in bd approximation with exact ones [ see fig . [ fig : vinfty](b ) ] . therefore , blankenbecler s predictions may agree with particular experiment @xcite rather nicely , too . basic agreement of experimental results with @xcite ( and disagreement with @xcite ) was actually reported in @xcite . however , for foils several times thinner that currently used ( or made of a lighter material ) , we predict a growing inaccuracy of blankenbecler - drell predictions . at the same time , for weaker scattering foils , the visibility of _ secondary _ spectral minima and maxima can yet increase by about a factor of 2 [ see figs . [ fig : vinfty](b),(c ) ] . having dwelt enough on the case of bremsstrahlung on two targets separated by a fixed distance , it would be instructive also to generalize it so that it could be compared with the conventional case of bremsstrahlung in an extended random medium . of course , presently we possess equations for radiation only at two scatterings , but arguably , the greatest contribution to the interference must come from nearest scatterings . therefore , we can exploit previous formulae , if @xmath43 is regarded as a random variable distributed within some range @xmath319 . rather realistically , it can be modeled by an exponential @xmath320 , corresponding to the probability of avoiding an encounter with the next atom in a uniform gas with the mean interatomic distance @xmath321 . to preserve the anti - lpm effect , though , we must prevent @xmath43 from tending to zero , as was pointed out in sec . [ sec:2scat ] . for simplicity , we shall assume the shape of the anticorrelation to be described also by an exponential , but shorter - range one , thus choosing the distribution function @xmath322 parameter @xmath323 provides the ` repulsion ' distance between the scatterers . weighting eq . ( [ didomega - combined ] ) with ( [ dwdt21 ] ) , we get @xmath324\!\!\bigg\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the @xmath0-depending factor in the integrand is now a difference of lorentzians ( bell - shaped functions of definite sign ) having different heights and widths determined by @xmath321 or @xmath325 , but equal areas . the first term in the brackets is negative , and can be associated with lpm - like uniform suppression , whereas the second term is positive , representing the anti - lpm enhancement , which is now strictly positive and non - oscillatory . the shapes of radiation - angle - integral spectra are illustrated in fig . [ fig : oscill - aver - t21 ] for same values of @xmath70 as in fig . [ fig : exact - oscill ] , and ( for the sake of illustration ) a moderately large ratio @xmath326 . it may be observed that with the increase of @xmath70 , the shape of lpm - like suppression sharpens towards @xmath327 , although it does not tend to the thick - target dependence @xmath328 . obviously , to get the @xmath329 behavior , more than two scatterings need to be involved . spectra of bremsstrahlung on two plates with a randomized distance between them , eq . ( [ i - aver - t21 ] ) , for @xmath330 and same parameter values for scattering strengths as in fig . [ fig : exact - oscill ] . ] finally , we note that in atomic matter , scales @xmath321 and @xmath325 should vastly differ . to estimate @xmath321 , it may suffice to note that according to migdal s calculation , typical @xmath0 at which lpm effect develops are @xmath331 , where @xmath332 is the range at which the angle of multiple scattering becomes comparable with the radiation angle @xmath56 . hence , @xmath333 , and owing to the presence of factor @xmath334 , this range is at least by 4 orders of magnitude greater than typical interatomic distance ( a few units of @xmath42 ) , which must constitute the scale for @xmath325 . therefore , anti - lpm enhancement in atomic matter must be virtually invisible indeed , reconciling its principal existence with the conventional theories of the lpm effect . put differently , @xmath335 can be effectively sent to zero , justifying the formal use of the @xmath35-correlated model of multiple scattering employed by migdal @xcite . in course of our study , we arrived at the following conclusions : * for scattering foils with macroscopic and fixed separation , the lpm - like suppression of bremsstrahlung at lowest @xmath0 is accompanied by an adjacent enhancement , which can be called the anti - lpm effect . the latter effect may be associated with an inclined - half - wavelength resonance [ see eq . ( [ denom=1+theta^2 ] ) ] , but not with the unit wavelength resonance , as was previously suggested in @xcite . in classical electrodynamics , lpm and anti - lpm effects are predicted to have equal strength , in the sense that their @xmath0-integrated effect is zero ( see the end of sec . [ sec:2scat ] ) . however , in a random and weakly scattering media , like the ordinary atomic matter , the anti - lpm enhancement is expected to smear over a broad spectral interval , and thus become faint . * the shape of the anti - lpm maximum depends on the strength of the scattering in each plate ( see fig . [ fig : exact - oscill ] ) . it assumes universal forms for limits of strong or weak scattering : for small scattering angles in both plates , the shape of the oscillatory pattern in the spectrum is described by eq . ( [ g - qq - def ] ) . for large scattering angles in both plates , it is described by function ( [ e1 ] ) ( unifying different limiting cases described in @xcite ) . for the mixed case when one plate scatters strongly , and another one weakly , the spectrum shape obeys eq . ( [ g_ql - def ] ) , where the dependence of the interference term on @xmath70 strictly saturates . * at asymptotically large @xmath0 , the dominant contribution to the interference term stems from photon emission angles close to @xmath149 , such that @xmath336 . therewith , the interference term scales as @xmath337 , with the coefficient proportional to the product of @xmath167-amplitudes of radiation emitted strictly parallel to @xmath149 [ see eq . ( [ di - largelambda ] ) ] . granted this universality , the locations of _ secondary _ maxima and minima are virtually independent of the scattering strength in the plates . we have also established that if the rms scattering angle is calculated with a proper account of coulomb corrections , the predictions of gaussian averaging are pretty close to those of the more precise molire averaging , and practically comply with the results of zakharov @xcite , and baier and katkov @xcite . for 2 scattering plates , the equation for molire averaging is basically as simple as that for gaussian averaging . finally , we note that satisfactory agreement of predictions of classical electrodynamics with experiment was found . for future experiment planning , it may be useful to refer to visibilities of the interference minima and maxima at low and at large @xmath0 , computed in sec . [ sec : analysis ] ( figs . [ fig : v ] and [ fig : vinfty ] ) . it may be added that prospects of observing anti - lpm effect in radiation may be not restricted to artificial assemblies of plates , provided one finds a case when @xmath338 , i.e. , every constituent of the matter can scatter the radiating projectile relativistically . conditions for such a situation may be sought , for instance , in nuclear matter . this work was supported in part by uffr project no . to clarify the success of the gaussian approximation in conjunction with interpolation ( [ highland - approx ] ) for the rms scattering angle , consider the large-@xmath339 limit of eq . ( [ exp - k1 ] ) : @xmath340}\right\}\nonumber\\ & \simeq&2\int_0^{\rho_0 } \frac{d\rho}{\rho}\left\{1-e^{-\frac12\rho^2\gamma^2\chi^2_c\left(\ln\frac{2}{\gamma\chi_1\rho}+\frac12-\gamma_{\text{e}}\right)}\right\}\nonumber\\ & \,&+2\int_{\rho_0}^{\infty } d\rho \rho k_1 ^ 2(\rho)\nonumber\\ & \simeq&\int_0^{\rho_0 ^ 2 } \frac{d\rho^2}{\rho^2}\left\{1-e^{-\frac14\rho^2\gamma^2\chi^2_c\left[\ln\left(\frac{\chi^2_c}{\chi^2_1}\ln\frac{\chi^2_c}{\chi^2_1}\right)+1 - 2\gamma_{\text{e}}\right]}\right\}\nonumber\\ & \,&+2\left(\ln\frac2{\rho_0}-\frac12-\gamma_{\text{e}}\right)\nonumber\\ & \simeq&\ln\left\{\gamma^2\chi^2_c\left[\ln\left(\frac{\chi^2_c}{\chi^2_1}\ln\frac{\chi^2_c}{\chi^2_1}\right)+1 - 2\gamma_{\text{e}}\right]\right\}-1-\gamma_{\text{e}}. \nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] comparing it with eq . ( [ fsigma - la ] ) , we establish the correspondence @xmath341.\ ] ] if we neglect here @xmath342 , and substitute @xmath118 from eq . ( [ chi2c / chi21 ] ) , it casts as next , one can put @xmath344 , @xmath345 , @xmath346 , and @xmath347 can vary from @xmath348 ( if @xmath349 ) to @xmath350 ( if @xmath351 ) . as a result , @xmath70 can be approximated by @xmath352 with @xmath353 , and @xmath354 . those numbers comply with the coefficients in eq . ( [ highland - approx ] ) , which we have thereby derived ab initio . parameter @xmath310 can also be compared with rossi s @xmath355 mev . product @xmath356 becomes twice smaller than @xmath357 at @xmath358 , which then exactly corresponds to approximation ( [ blankenbecler - q2def ] ) . in general case , of course , it is more reliable to use formula with an explicit @xmath359 dependence , like ( [ highland - approx ] ) . Abstract:
[ "we investigate the interference pattern in the spectrum of non - dipole bremsstrahlung on two amorphous foils . apart from suppression at lowest @xmath0 , the spectrum exhibits an enhancement adjacent to it . in classical electrodynamics , the net effect of suppression and enhancement proves to be zero . we study the location and the origin of the spectral features , comparing predictions of full molire averaging with those of the gaussian averaging with coulomb corrections to the rms multiple scattering angle . comparison with experimental data , and with previous theoretical predictions is presented ." ]
11,991
11,991
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the internet is a primary example of a large - scale , self organized , complex system . understanding the processes that shape its topology would provide tools for engineering its future . the internet is assembled out of multiple autonomous systems ( ass ) , which are contracted by different economic agreements . these , in turn , compose the routing pathways among the ass . with some simplifications , we can represent the resulting network as a graph , where two nodes ( ass ) are connected by a link if traffic is allowed to traverse through them . the statistical properties of this `` internet graph '' , such as the clustering properties , degree distribution etc . , have been thoroughly investigated @xcite . however , without proper understanding of the mechanism that led to this structure , the statistical analysis alone lacks the ability to either predict the future evolution of the internet nor to shape its evolution . a large class of models , a primary example is the `` preferential attachment '' model @xcite , use probabilistic rules in order to simulate the network evolution and recover some of its statistical properties . yet , these models fail to account for many other features of the network @xcite . possibly , one of the main reasons for that is they treat the ass as passive elements rather than economic , profit - maximizing entities . therefore , an agent - based approach is a promising alternative . game theory is one of the main tools of the trade in estimating the performance of distributed algorithms @xcite . it describes the behavior of interacting rational agents and the resulting equilibria . game theory has been applied extensively to fundamental control tasks in communication networks , such as flow control @xcite , network security @xcite , routing @xcite and wireless network design @xcite . recently , there has been increased activity in the field of _ network formation games_. these studies aim to understand the network structure that results from interactions between rational agents @xcite . different authors emphasized different contexts , such as wireless networks @xcite or the inter - as topology @xcite . the theme of such research is to investigate the equilibria s properties , e.g. , establishing their existence and obtaining bounds on the `` price of anarchy '' and price of stability . these metrics measure from above and below , correspondingly , the social cost deterioration at an equilibrium compared with a ( socially ) optimal solution . alternatively , agent - based simulations are used in order to obtain statistical characteristics of the resulting topology @xcite . nonetheless , the vast majority of these studies assume that the players are identical , whereas the internet is a heterogeneous mixture of various entities , such as cdns , minor isps , tier-1 ass etc . there are only a few studies that have explicitly considered the effects of heterogeneity on the network structure . some examples include @xcite , which extends a previous model of formation games for directed networks @xcite , and in the context of social networks , @xcite . the latter describes a network formation game in which the link costs are heterogeneous and the benefit depends only on a player s nearest neighbors ( i.e. , no spillovers ) . most of the studies on the application of game theory to networks , with very few exceptions , e.g. , @xcite , focused on static properties of the game . this is particularly true for network formation games . however , it is not clear that the internet has reached an equilibrium . indeed , ass continuously draw new contracts , some merge with others while other quit business . in fact , a dynamic inspection of the inter - as network suggests that the system may be far from equilibrium . therefore , a _ dynamic _ study of an inter - as network formation game is needed . in addition , previous work ignores an important requirement that autonomous systems has - reliability . indeed , failures occur , and an as must face such events . while some game theoretic works addressed reliability in other contexts @xcite , to the best of our knowledge , there are no works that considered the _ topological properties _ that emerge in a _ heterogeneous , dynamic , _ network formation game with _ reliability constraints . _ we establish an analytically - tractable model , which explicitly accounts for the heterogeneity of players as well as reliability requirements . we base our model on the heralded fabrikant model @xcite , which was recently extended to include heterogeneous players @xcite . we model the inter - as connectivity as a network formation game with _ heterogeneous _ players that may share costs by monetary transfers . we account for the inherent bilateral nature of the agreements between players , by noting that the establishment of a link requires the agreement of both nodes at its ends , while removing a link can be done unilaterally . as reliability comes into play , agents may require to be connected to other agents , or to all the other agents in the network , by at least two disjoint paths . we investigate both the static properties of the resulting game as well as its dynamic evolution . game theoretic analysis is dominantly employed as a `` toy model '' for contemplating about real - world phenomena . it is rarely confronted with real - world data . in this study we go a step further from traditional formal analysis , and we do consider real inter - as topology data analysis to support our theoretical findings . the main contributions of our study are as follows : * in the context of network formation games , we provide a theoretical framework that introduces reliability constraints . we discuss both the case of frequent failures , where the fall - back pathways are as frequently used as the main pathways , as well as the case of rare crashes . * we introduce the concept of _ price of reliability _ , which is defined as the ratio of the social cost with reliability constraints to the social cost with no such additional constraints . surprisingly , we show that this price can be smaller than one , namely , that the additional reliability requirements may increase the social utility . * we provide dynamical analysis of topological quantities , and explain the prevalence of some `` _ _ network motifs _ _ '' , i.e. , sub - graphs that appear frequently in the network . through real - world data , we provide encouraging support to our predictions . in the next section , we describe our model . we discuss alternative variants that address different failure frequencies or whether utility transfers ( e.g. , monetary transfers ) are allowed or not ; we address both the case of allowing utility ( i.e. , monetary ) transfers as well as the case where this is not possible . next , in section 3 , we provide static analysis . dynamic analysis is presented in section 4 . in section 5 we compare our theoretical predictions with real - world data on inter - as topologies . finally , conclusions are presented in section 6 . we assume that each as is a player . while there are many types of players , following @xcite , we aggregate them into two types : _ major league _ ( or t__ype - a _ _ ) players , such as major isps , central search engines and the likes , and _ minor league _ ( or _ type - b _ ) players , such as local isp or small enterprises . each player , regardless of its type , may form contracts with other players , and should they reach a mutual understanding , a link between them is formed . a player s strategy is set by specifying which links it is interested in establishing , and , if permissible , the price it will be willing to pay for each . in order to maintain reliable routing pathways , players may be required to sustain at least _ two disjoint paths _ to other players or a subset of players . we denote the set of type - a ( type b ) player by @xmath0 ( @xmath1 ) . a link connecting node @xmath2 to node @xmath3 is denoted as either @xmath4 or @xmath5 . the total number of players is @xmath6 , and we assume @xmath7 . the _ shortest distance _ between nodes @xmath2 and @xmath3 is the minimal number of hops along a path connecting them and is denoted by @xmath8 . finally , the degree of node @xmath2 is denoted by @xmath9 . our cost function is based on the cost structure in @xcite and @xcite . players are penalized for their distance from other players . first and foremost , players require a good , fast connection to the major players , while they may relax their connection requirements to minor players . bandwidth usage and delay depends heavily on the hop distance , and connection quality is represented by this metric . similarly to @xcite , we weight the relative importance of a major player by a factor @xmath10 in the cost function in the corresponding distance term . the link prices represent factors such as the links maintenance costs , bandwidth allocation costs etc . different player types may incur different link costs , @xmath11 , due to varying financial resources or infrastructure . all ass must maintain access to the internet in case of a single link failure . this is tantamount to the requirement that all the players must have at least two _ disjoint _ paths to each other node . nevertheless , if either link prices are high , crash frequencies are low or the content of a minor as is of little value , players may relax their reliability requirements and demand the establishment of disjoint paths only to the major players . this is represented in the cost function by a control parameter @xmath12 , which is set to one if two disjoint paths are required to all nodes , and zero if the requirement holds for ( other ) nodes of major players only . conversely , if failures are often , then the regular and backup paths ( in the corresponding pair of disjoint paths ) are used almost as frequently . as such , they must be weighted the same in the cost function . therefore , the distance cost is composed of two terms , one represents the distance along the primary path and the other represents the distance along the backup path . the relative weight of these two terms is set by a parameter @xmath13 if failures are frequent and the likelihood of using either route is the same , we have @xmath14 . however , if failures are rare , traffic will be mostly carried across the shorter path . therefore its length should carry more weight in the cost than the length of the backup route , hence @xmath15 . this motivates the following cost function . two paths , @xmath16 and @xmath17 are disjoint if they have no node in common , namely if the unordered sets satisfy @xmath18 the cost function @xmath19 of node @xmath2 of type @xmath20 , is defined as:[cost - definition ] @xmath21 where @xmath8 and @xmath22 are the lengths of a pair of disjoint paths between @xmath23 that minimizes the cost function . @xmath8 denotes the length of the shorter path . formally , denote a pair of disjoint paths connecting player @xmath2 and player @xmath3 as @xmath24 , where @xmath25 @xmath26 is the length of shorter ( correspondingly , longer ) path . set @xmath27 then @xmath28 and @xmath29 . if there is not pair of disjoint path player @xmath2 and player @xmath3 , then @xmath30 , with @xmath31if there is not a path connecting players @xmath2 and @xmath3 we also have @xmath32 for convenience , we set @xmath33 . we assume @xmath34 the social cost is the sum of individual costs , @xmath35 . we denote the optimal ( minimal ) social cost as @xmath36 _ _ , _ _ and the social cost at the optimal stable solution is @xmath37 . the _ price of stability _ is the ratio between the social cost at the best stable solution and its value at the optimal solution , namely @xmath38 . similarly , denote by @xmath39 the highest social cost in an equilibrium . then , the _ price of anarchy _ is the ratio between the social cost at the worst stable solution and its value at the optimal solution , namely @xmath40 . note that the requirement of disjoint _ node _ paths generalizes the requirement of disjoint _ link _ paths and protects against link failures within an autonomous system . all of our results apply to both notions of disjoint path ( except a refinement of theorem [ thm : symmetric dynamic ] ; see the discussion there ) . for simplicity and generality we shall use the notion of a disjoint node paths . we denote the change in cost of player @xmath2 as after the addition ( removal ) of a link @xmath41 by @xmath42 ( correspondingly , @xmath43 ) . the abbreviation @xmath44 is often used . if @xmath14 , then the two routing pathways are used the same . in this case , the shortest cycle length @xmath45 is the relevant quantity that appears in the cost function . this can be found in polynomial time by using suurballe s algorithm @xcite . however , if @xmath15 , routing will occurs along two disjoint paths , such that the length of the shortest between the two is shortest ( among all pairs of disjoint paths ) . although the complexity of finding this pair is np - hard , first finding the shortest path and then finding the next shortest path is a heuristic that works remarkably well , both in the real - world data analysis and on the networks obtained in the theoretical discussion . the reason behind this is that , when failures are rare , information is predominantly routed along the shortest path . when players are required to establish a fall - back route , they will establish a path that is disjoint from the _ current _ routing path , namely the shortest one . the establishment of a link requires the bilateral agreement of the two parties at its ends , while removing a link can be done unilaterally . this is known as a _ pairwise - stable _ equilibrium@xcite . the players strategies are _ pairwise - stable _ if for all @xmath46 , the following hold : \a ) if @xmath47 , then @xmath48 ; \b ) if @xmath49 , then either @xmath50 or @xmath51 . the resulting graph is referred to as a _ stabilizable _ graph . the additional reliability requirements result in additional link expenses , as for example , the degree of every node needs to be at least two . the _ price of reliability _ is the ratio between the optimal social cost under the additional survivability constraint to the optimal social cost when the additional constraints are removed . the cost function,@xmath52 , of node @xmath2 of type @xmath20 , is obtained by setting @xmath53 in definition [ cost - definition ] and requiring the existence of only a _ path from player @xmath2 to any other players in the network . denote the optimal social cost without the additional survivability requirement in a pairwise stable equilibrium as @xmath54 . the _ price of reliability _ ( _ por ) _ is the ratio between the optimal value of the social costs among the set of stable equilibria , @xmath55 . surprisingly , we shall show that there exist scenarios in which reliability requirements _ increase _ the social utility , so that the price of reliability can be smaller than one . thus far , it was implicitly assumed that utility transfer is not feasible . nevertheless , often players are able to transfer utility , for example via monetary transactions . an extended model that incorporates such transfers is introduced by allowing for a monetary transaction in which player @xmath2 pays player @xmath3 some amount @xmath56 iff the link @xmath57 is established @xcite . player @xmath3 sets some minimal price @xmath58 and should @xmath59 the link is formed . [ monetary cost definition]the cost function of player @xmath2 when monetary transfers are allowed is @xmath60 . we recall the observation in @xcite that , without transfers , a link will be established only if _ both _ parties , @xmath2 and @xmath3 , reduce their costs , @xmath61 and @xmath62 . but , when monetary transfers are allowed , an edge will be established if ( and only if ) the relaxed condition @xmath63 holds . in game theoretic terms , this condition is equivalent to the requirement that the _ core _ of the two players game is non - empty . _ _ in the remainder of the paper , whenever monetary transfers are feasible , we will state it explicitly , otherwise the basic model ( without transfers ) is assumed . we shall now analyze the properties of stable equilibria , such as the _ price of anarchy _ , which is the ratio between the social cost at the worst stable solution and its value at the optimal solution , and the _ price of stability _ , which is the ratio between the social cost at the best stable solution and its value at the optimal solution . we shall further discuss topological properties that emerge from our analysis . it was shown in @xcite that if @xmath64 the only stable solution is a clique and in @xcite it was shown that if @xmath65 then the major players form a clique . one may have guessed that reliability requirements , which generally induce the creation of additional , backup edges , would ease the formation of the clique . the next proposition shows that this naive assumption is wrong , and in fact , as the frequency of failure increases , it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain the major player s clique . consider a dense set , in which every player may access all the other players within two hops by a at least two disjoint paths . a direct link between two players only reduces their mutual distance by one , and does not affect any other distance . if this link fails often , it may be used only partially , and it may not be worthy to pay its cost . hence , in this setting , counter intuitively , frequent failures end up with a sparser network . assume the frequency of failures is high , namely @xmath66 then , the type - a players form a clique if and only if @xmath67 . allowing monetary transfers does not change the result . we consider a major player s clique and ask under which conditions the removal of a link is a worthy move . consider an edge @xmath4 in this clique . since only the shortest distance between players @xmath2 and @xmath3 is affected , and is increased by one , the type - a players clique is stable if and only if @xmath68 . as the major players ( tier-1 as ) form a densely connected set , a clique - like subgraph , in the rest of the paper we shall only consider the case where @xmath67 . we also assume , trivially , that @xmath69 , as otherwise the only stabilizable network is a clique . the next proposition describes a scenario in which , surprisingly , the additional reliability constraints _ reduce _ the social cost . the optimal solution when @xmath70 and @xmath71 , according to prop . [ lem : reliable optimal 1 ] . the type - b players are in red circles . the type - a clique is in blue squares . ] [ lem : reliable optimal 1 ] assume @xmath70 and symmetric reliability requirements , namely @xmath71 . then , the optimal network is composed of a type - a clique , where all the type @xmath72 nodes are connected to all members of the type - a clique , as depicted in fig . [ fig : the - optimal - solution ] . this network is not stabilizable , and @xmath73 . nevertheless , for @xmath74 , we have @xmath75 . in addition , the price of reliability is smaller than one . the main idea behind this result is that in the optimal , yet unstable solution , every minor player establishes a link with all the major players ( fig . [ fig : the - optimal - solution ] ) . this configuration is unstable as it is over - saturated with links , and the optimal stable solution is obtained by diluting this network so that every minor player will connect to just two major players . if the reliability requirements are further removed , then additional dilution occurs , increasing the social cost . in other words , the stable configuration is under - saturated with edges , and the additional survivability requirements facilitate the formation of additional links . we shall now prove the first part of this theorem , namely that the network described in fig . [ fig : the - optimal - solution ] , is optimal in terms of social cost . in this network , every type - b player is connected to every type - a player . we denote this network by @xmath76 first , consider a network in which the type - a players are not in a clique . then , there exists two players @xmath77 such that @xmath78 . by establishing a link @xmath4 the change in social cost is @xmath79 therefore a network which includes this link has a lower social cost . hence , in the optimal network , all the type - a players are in clique . a similar calculation for a missing link between player @xmath80 and @xmath81 shows that @xmath82 and establishing this link reduces the social cost as well . in conclusion , in an optimal network a type - a player is connected to all the other players . consider node @xmath83 its distance from every other node @xmath81 is @xmath84 and @xmath85 . the minimal distances between two minor players @xmath86 are @xmath87 and @xmath85 whereas in @xmath88 we have @xmath89 . assume that a network with a lower social cost exists , and denote it by @xmath90 . in @xmath90 there must exists a link between two type - b players , @xmath86 . however , removing this link reduces the social cost , as @xmath91 therefore , @xmath90 is not optimal , in contradiction to our assumption . this proves that @xmath88 is optimal . next , we are going to show @xmath88 is unstable . consider @xmath92 and @xmath93 . by removing @xmath94 we cost change of player @xmath95 is @xmath96 and therefore it is beneficial for player @xmath95 to remove this link . hence , this network in not stabilizable . finally , we are going to show that the @xmath97 . the outline is as follows . first , we are going to show that the network depicted in fig . @xmath98 is stable . the optimal stable network ( without reliability requirements ) in this parameter regime was explicitly derived in @xcite . we are going to show that the cost in the latter network is higher than the former , which bound the @xmath99 from above by a value smaller than one . consider a network in which all the minor players are connected to two major players , @xmath100 . we are going to show that this network is stable . clearly , as shown before , the type - a clique is stable . in addition , for any player @xmath92 neither @xmath101 nor @xmath2 has the incentive to remove either @xmath102 or @xmath103 as it would violate the reliability requirement and would lead to unbounded cost . hence , this network is stable . denote this network by @xmath104 in @xcite it was shown that the optimal stable network ( without reliability requirements ) in this configuration is the network in which all type - a players form a clique , and all the type - b players are connected to a single type - a player . we denote the latter network by @xmath105we have @xmath106 but , @xmath107 this concludes the proof . in conclusion , if the failure frequency is high , the survivability requirements will induce dilution of the clique of major players . however , the opposite effect occurs along the graph cut - set between the set of minor players and the set of major players , where the additional constraints lead to an increased number of links connecting major and minor players . so far we have assumed that the reliability requirements are symmetric . as explained in the introduction , in some cases it is reasonable to assume that players will require a backup route only to the major players , i.e. , non - symmetric reliability constraints . we shall now show that in this case , the social cost may deteriorate considerably . hence , from a system designer point of view , it is much more important to incentivize a configuration where the reliability requirements are symmetric , than to reduce failure frequency globally . this result stems from the following lemma . [ lem : finite distances]if @xmath108 then for every two nodes i , j , @xmath109 . if @xmath110 there exists stable equiliberia such that there are no two disjoint paths between some nodes @xmath23 . first , we are going to show that @xmath22 is finite ( step 1 ) . then , in the second step , we shall bound @xmath22 from above . note , that if there are nt two disjoint paths between players @xmath2 and @xmath3 , it is beneficial for both players to add the link @xmath4 and form a path . step 1 : if @xmath2 and @xmath3 are disconnected , then it is worthy for both of them to establish the link @xmath4 . therefore , there exists a path from @xmath2 to @xmath3 and @xmath8 is finite . assume @xmath111 . if there are nt two disjoint paths between nodes @xmath2 and @xmath112 it is worthy for both nodes to establish a direct link . hence if @xmath111 the distance @xmath22 is finite . we now discuss the case @xmath87 and show there must exists an additional disjoint path , so @xmath22 is finite . we prove by negation . take node @xmath113 . as before , both @xmath114 and @xmath115 are finite . consider the following two cases : \a ) @xmath116 , @xmath117 . then , the trajectory @xmath118 is disjoint from the path @xmath4 , and it is therefore worthy for both player @xmath2 and player @xmath3 to establish the link @xmath119 hence @xmath22 is finite . \b ) @xmath116 , @xmath120 or @xmath121 , @xmath117 . without loss of generality , we assume the first case . according to the previous discussion , there are at least two disjoint paths from @xmath95 to @xmath122 since they are disjoint , only one of them may contain the edge @xmath4 . therefore , there exist a path @xmath123 that is disjoint from the edge @xmath4 and therefore @xmath22 is finite . \c ) @xmath121 , @xmath120 . applying the same reasoning as in b ) , there exists a path from @xmath2 to @xmath95 that is disjoint from the edge @xmath4 . likewise , there exists a path from @xmath3 to @xmath95 that is disjoint from the edge @xmath119 therefore there exist a path from @xmath2 to @xmath3 that is disjoint from @xmath119 step 2 : step 1 has shown that every two nodes are connected by a cycle . let us assume the longest shortest cycle connecting two nodes is of length @xmath124 , namely there exists a cycle @xmath125 . by establishing the link @xmath126 the cost of player @xmath127 due to distances from other players is reduced by at least @xmath128 , hence the link will be established as @xmath129 and similarly @xmath130 . since @xmath131 the proof is complete . if there exist players with no two disjoint paths in an equilibrium , then the social cost becomes unbounded . this immediately results in an _ unbounded _ price of anarchy , as indicated by the following theorem . [ thm : price of anarchy]consider a network such that @xmath132 . the price of anarchy is as follows : \a ) in a setting with asymmetric reliability requirements @xmath133 : unbounded . \b ) in a setting with symmetric reliability requirements @xmath134 : bounded by @xmath135 . \a ) we shall prove this by showing that there exists a stable equilibrium with unbounded social cost . consider a network in which the major players ( type - a players ) form a clique , while every minor player is connected only to a single type - a player @xmath136 . we shall show that this network is stabilizable . as discusses before , the type - a clique is stable . consider @xmath83 by forming the link @xmath94 the change of cost of player @xmath93 , @xmath137 is @xmath138 hence , this link will be formed . no additional links between minor players will be established , since such a link only reduces the distance between the participating parties by one , @xmath139 and does not provide an additional disjoint path to the type - a clique . therefore , the social cost is @xmath140 . \b ) the total cost due to the inter - connectivity of the type - a clique is identical for all link stable equilibria and is @xmath141 . this cost is composed of @xmath142 links per node , and the distance cost to every other major nodes , @xmath143 next , we evaluate the cost due to the type - b nodes inter - distances . according to lemma [ lem : finite distances ] , both @xmath144 and @xmath145 , so the cost due to the inter - distances between a type - b player and every other player is bounded from above by @xmath146 . when summed up over all minor players , this contributes a term @xmath147 to the social cost . likewise , the cost of links that at least one of their ends is a type b player is at most @xmath148 . therefore , the maximal cost in all link stable equilibria is bounded from above by @xmath149 the optimal network configuration is described in proposition [ lem : reliable optimal 1 ] . it is straightforward to evaluate the social cost in this configuration . the distance cost due to inter - distances of the type - b players is @xmath150 while the cost of all links which connect type - b players to type - a players is @xmath151 finally , the social cost due to the type - a clique remains the same , so finally we obtain that the minimal social cost is @xmath152 by taking the limits @xmath153 we obtain that @xmath154 . a stable equilibrium with infinite social cost can be easily achieved by considering a network where all minor players are connected to a single , designated , major player . there exists a single path of at most two hops between every minor player to every major player . however , as the stability requirements are asymmetric , the major players have no incentive to establish additional routes to any minor player , and the reliability requirements of the minor players remain unsatisfied . the previous discussion assumed that a player can not compensate other players for an increase in their costs . yet , contracts between ass often do involve monetary transactions . accordingly , in this subsection we shall highlight the additional insights that are obtained when utility transfers are permissible . our first result indicates that , in this setting , in contrast to the previous setting , there always exists a fallback route between every two players , regardless of the symmetric or asymmetric nature of the additional survivability constraints . if monetary transfers are feasible , players may compensate other players for the cost of additional links such that all the additional constraints are satisfied . hence , symmetry is less important than in the previous scenario . furthermore , this result suggests that every player is connected to every other player by a cycle . the following proposition shows that the maximal cycle length decays with the number of major players . as the number of ass increases in time , this predicts that this length should decrease in time . we shall verify this prediction in section [ sec : data - analysis ] . [ prop : max distance]assume @xmath155 . then , every two players are connected by a cycle , and the maximal cycle length connecting a major player to a minor player is bounded by @xmath156 _ _ lemma [ lem : finite distances ] showed that the maximal distance between players is bounded . we are going to tighten this result in the regime where monetary transfers are feasible . denote the maximal distance between type - a player and a type_b player by @xmath157 . _ _ _ _ first , we are going to show that the maximal cycle length connecting a major player and a minor player is @xmath158 this follows from a simple geometric argument . consider two players , @xmath80 and @xmath81 . assume @xmath159 . if the cycle length is @xmath160 or greater , there exists a type - b node that its distance @xmath161 in contradiction to the assumption that the maximal distance between a major player and and a minor player is @xmath157 . denote maximal distance between two minor players by @xmath162 a similar argument shows that maximal cycle length between two minor players is @xmath163 . _ _ _ _ next , are going to show that the maximal distance connecting a major player and a minor player is @xmath164 . we prove by negation . assume that the distance between player @xmath136 and @xmath92 is @xmath165 . denote the nodes on the path as @xmath166 . then , by establishing a link between them , the distance between @xmath3 and @xmath167 ( similarly , and distance between player @xmath2 and players @xmath168 ) is reduced . in addition , player @xmath2 reduces its distance to every node of the type - a clique by @xmath165 . lemma 25 of @xcite shows that the total reduction in distance is @xmath128 . then , by establishing the link @xmath4 we have @xmath169 _ _ _ _ and as @xmath170 this expression is negative . therefore , the link will be established , and the maximal shortest distance between a major player and a minor player is smaller than @xmath165 . this concludes the proof . _ _ our second result is based on the first one , and shows that the price of anarchy is bounded . in fact , as the network grows , proposition [ prop : max distance ] also indicates that its diameter _ shrinks_. therefore , in the large network limit , the price of anarchy is bounded by a constant . the price of anarchy is bounded by @xmath135 . furthermore , if @xmath171 then the price of anarchy is upper bounded by 2 . in proposition [ prop : max distance ] s proof we showed that the maximal distance between a major player a minor player is bounded by @xmath172 it immediately follows that in the large network limit , as @xmath173 , every player is directly connected to a player that , in turn is connected to the type - a players . the latter can be either a major player , as part of the clique , or a minor player that is connected to every player in the major player s clique . note that a link between any two players @xmath174 and @xmath175 reduces the social cost , since it at least lowers the costs of @xmath174 of @xmath175 and can only reduce the costs of other players . therefore , we can bound the social cost by a configuration in which every type - b player has the minimal number of links , namely two , is at distance two from every major player . therefore , the worst social cost in bounded by @xmath176 comparing this bound with @xmath36 , as derived in proposition [ lem : reliable optimal 1 ] , in the limit @xmath153 completes the proof . the internet undergoes continuous transformations , such as the emergence of new ass , or formation of new traffic contracts . in fact , it may very well be out of equilibrium . therefore , a static analysis of the equilibrium points must be accompanied by dynamic analysis . accordingly , our main focus in this section is to identify prevalent network motifs @xcite , i.e. , small sub - graphs that emerge during the natural evolution of the network . in section [ sec : data - analysis ] we shall show that these motifs are indeed ubiquitous in the real as topology , and the frequency of their occurrences is few folds _ _ more than expected in a random network . while there are many possible equiliberia , we shall show that convergence occurs only to _ just a few_. we shall also show that the convergence time is short , namely _ linear _ in the number of players . we start the discussion by setting up the dynamic framework , as first formulated in @xcite . we split the game into _ turns _ , where at each turn only a single player is allowed to remove or initiate the formation of links . at each point in time , or turn , the players that already joined the game form a subset @xmath177 . we shall implicitly assume that the cost function is calculated with respect to the set @xmath178 of players that are already present in the network . each turn is divided into _ moves , _ at each of which a player either forms or removes a single link . a player s turn is over when it has no incentive to perform additional moves . note that disconnections of several links can be done unilaterally and hence iteratively . dynamic rule # 1 : in player @xmath2 s turn it may choose to move @xmath179 times . in each move , it may remove a link @xmath180 or , if player @xmath3 agrees , it may establish the link @xmath4 . player @xmath3 would agree to establish @xmath4 iff @xmath181 . according to this definition , during player s @xmath2 turn , all the other players will act in a greedy , rather than strategic , manner . for example , although it may be that player @xmath3 prefers that a link @xmath182 would be established for some @xmath183 , if we adopt dynamic rule # 1 it will accept the establishment of the less favorable link @xmath119 in other words , the active player has the advantage of initiation and the other players react to its offers . there are numerous scenarios in which players can not fully forecast other players moves and offers , e.g. , when information is asymmetric or when only partial information is available @xcite . in these settings , it is likely that a greedy strategy will become the modus operandi of many players . this is a prevalent strategy also when the system evolves rapidly and it is difficult to assess the current network state and dynamics . in a dynamic network formation game , a key question is : can a player temporarily disconnects itself from the graph , only to reconnect after getting to a better bargaining position ? or must a player stay connected ? if the timescale in which the costs are evaluated is comparable to the timescale in which the dynamics occur , then , clearly , a player will not disconnect from the network voluntarily . however , if the latter is much shorter , it may , for a very brief time , disconnect itself from the graph in order to perform some strategic move . the following rules address the two alternative limits . dynamic rule # 2a : let the set of links at the current move @xmath184 be denoted as @xmath185 . a link @xmath4 will be added if @xmath2 asks to form this link and @xmath186 . in addition , any link @xmath4 can be removed in move @xmath187 dynamic rule # 2b : in addition to dynamic rule # 2a , player @xmath2 would only remove a link @xmath4 if @xmath188 and would establish a link if both @xmath186 and @xmath189 according to dynamic rule # 2a , a player is allowed to perform a strategic plan in which the first few steps will increase its cost , as long as when the plan is completed its cost will be reduced . on the other hand , if the game follows dynamic rule # 2b , then a player s cost must be reduced _ at each move _ , hence such multi - move plan is not possible . our first result in this section shows that , during the natural evolution of the network , a `` double star '' sub - graph , or network motif , often emerges . in the `` double star '' motif , as depicted in fig . [ fig : generalized star 2 ] , there exists a primary and a secondary star . all the minor players are connected to the primary star s center . part of the players are also connected to the other star s center , forming the secondary star . consider a region where it is immensely difficult to establish a link to a major player , either due to geographical distance , link prices or perhaps additional physical links are simply not accessible . nevertheless , in order to maintain a reliable connection , there must be at least two links that connect this region to the internet backbone via some major players . in order to provide a stable , fault tolerant service , every player in this region will form links with the players hosting the endpoints of these links , forming the double star sub - graph . assume now that link prices reduce over time , or that the importance of a fast connection to the internet core increases in time . in this case , players may decide to establish direct links with the major players , and remove either one of both links connecting them to the star centers . note though , that players will be reluctant to disconnect from the star center if the number of nodes in the star is large . a network configuration which includes a `` double - star '' structure of minor players . every node in the primary star ( encircled in yellow ) is linked to a major player , node @xmath190 ( in green ) . a direct link connects the two star centers , denoted by 1 and 2 ( in pink ) . the members in the secondary star ( in purple ) are connected to both star centers . in addition , there secondary star center is also connected to the major player @xmath190 . there might be additional minor players outside the stars ( in red ) . needless to say , the type - a clique ( square boxes ) is also present . ] moreover , the next theorem also shows that , eventually , and fairly quickly , the system will converge to either the optimal stable state , or to a state in which the social cost is a low multiple of the optimal social cost . [ thm : symmetric dynamic]assume symmetric reliability requirements , i.e. , @xmath71 . if the players follow dynamic rules # 1 and # 2a , then , in any playing order : \a ) the system converges to either the optimal stable state , depicted in fig . [ fig : optimal and stable ] , or to the network depicted in fig . [ fig : generalized star 2 ] . \b ) in the large network limit , namely , when @xmath74 , the social costs ratio satisfy @xmath191 , with @xmath192 . \c ) if players play in a uniformly random order , the probability that the system has not converged by turn @xmath193 decays exponentially with @xmath193 . otherwise , if every player plays at least once in o(n ) turns , convergence occurs after o(n ) steps . we claim that the network , at any time , has the following structure ( fig . [ fig : generalized star 2 ] ) : a type - a players clique , and _ at most _ two type - b star centers @xmath194 . the larger ball s center is labelled as @xmath195 , and the smaller is @xmath196 . we denote the set of type - b players which are members of the star centered about node 1 ( 2 ) as @xmath197 and ( correspondingly , @xmath198 ) . we have @xmath199 in addition , some type - b players might be linked to two nodes @xmath200 , the set of these type - b players is denoted by @xmath201 . the set of type - a players that have a direct link with the star center @xmath195 ( star center @xmath196 ) is denoted by @xmath202 ( correspondingly @xmath203 ) . players @xmath204 form a clique . assuming the second star exists , it is connected to either players @xmath195 or @xmath205 ( or both ) . finally , there may be additional links between players is @xmath201 and @xmath203 . an example of this network structure is presented in fig . [ fig : generalized star 2 ] . .[tab : d(i , k)]the shortest distance @xmath8 between two nodes , as discussed in prop . [ thm : symmetric dynamic ] . note that if @xmath206 , than column 9 applies instead of column 8 for @xmath207 . [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ] we prove by induction . after the first three players played the induction base case is true . we first assume that the link @xmath208 and consider the case @xmath209 later . denote the active player by @xmath210 . consider the following cases : \1 . @xmath211 : as @xmath212 , @xmath210 will form ( or maintain ) links with every type - a player . if additional links to minor players are to be formed , it is clearly better for player @xmath210 to establish links first with either player @xmath195 or player @xmath196 than to any player in @xmath213 or @xmath207 . we first consider the case where @xmath214 and split into two cases : 1a ) if no two disjoint paths exists between player @xmath210 to players @xmath195 or @xmath196 , namely , if @xmath215 and either @xmath216 or @xmath217 , then it is beneficial for both @xmath210 and the star centers to link such that reliability requirements will be satisfied . 1b ) if @xmath218 then by establishing the edge @xmath219 we have @xmath220 while by establishing @xmath221 the change of cost is : @xmath222 as @xmath223 , player @xmath210 will prefer to establish first a link with player 1 rather than with player 2 . the link will be formed if @xmath224 , which is true if @xmath225 if condition [ eq:2r edge ] holds , then player @xmath210 will attempt to form a link with the star center @xmath196 , and succeed if condition [ eq : a - b link condition ] holds as well . establishing a link to any other type - b node is clearly an inferior option , as if a player had decided to establish links with either node @xmath195 or node @xmath226 an additional link to one of their leafs will only reduce the distance to it by 1 and hence is not a worthy course of action . therefore , @xmath227 . \2 . @xmath228 and @xmath229 . a player may disconnect itself and then choose its two optimal links . clearly , among the type - a clique , player @xmath230 best candidates are players @xmath231 , while among the type - b players , the cost reduction is maximal by linking to nodes @xmath232 . in addition , a link to node @xmath190 is at least as preferred a link to @xmath205 , while a link to node 1 is always preferred over a link to node @xmath196 as long as @xmath233 . therefore , we only need to consider three possible moves by player @xmath210 - linking to @xmath231 ( the red players in fig . [ fig : generalized star 2 ] ) , linking to @xmath234 or linking to @xmath232 . using tables [ tab : d(i , k ) ] and [ tab : d(i , k ) ] we can compare the cost of connecting to nodes @xmath232 versus the costs of connecting to nodes @xmath195 and @xmath190 . a simple calculation shows that if the expression @xmath235 is positive , than linking to players @xmath195 and @xmath190 is preferred over linking to player @xmath195 and @xmath196 . this expression is positive , as @xmath236 and @xmath223 . in a similar fashion , we can compare between the choices of linking to nodes @xmath195 and @xmath190 or forming links with nodes @xmath190 and @xmath237 if the expression @xmath238 is positive , then establishing links to @xmath195 and @xmath190 is preferred , otherwise the alternative will be chosen . two special cases are of interest : if @xmath239 and @xmath240 , then every player will prefer to link to @xmath190 and @xmath205 . that is , we ll get the optimal configuration . if @xmath14 , @xmath241 , i.e , node 1 is a member of the clique , @xmath242 and @xmath243 , then a minor player will connect to players @xmath195 and @xmath190 . note that if there are no type - a players present when @xmath210 plays , then it must connect to the star centers @xmath195 and @xmath196 . in addition , after @xmath210 formed two links , no player @xmath244 will agree to form the link @xmath245 , as the induced change of cost is @xmath246 if @xmath247 and @xmath248 then player @xmath249 and player @xmath250 will establish the link @xmath245 . by symmetry , this also happens when @xmath251 and @xmath252 . if @xmath253 then it must maintain links to all nodes in @xmath254 ( if there are any ) in order to satisfy the reliability criteria . additional links to type - a players will be formed according to the discussion in case 1 , while no other links to type - b player will be formed according to the discussion in case 2 . \4 . if @xmath255 , then it must maintain links to all nodes in @xmath198 ( if there are any ) in order to satisfy the reliability criteria . a similar calculation to the one in case @xmath196 shows that player @xmath196 s best course of action is to remain connected to player in order to complete the induction proof all that is left is to address the case @xmath209 . in this case , player @xmath196 must be connected to at least one additional player @xmath256 in order to have two disjoint path to every player in the network . clearly , its optimal choice is player @xmath205 . in order to maintain reliable path to every @xmath257 player @xmath205 must agree to form this link . player @xmath196 will disconnect @xmath208 if either @xmath258 or @xmath259 . however , if either of this conditions hold , tables [ tab : d(i , k ) ] and [ tab : d(i , k ) ] shows that for every @xmath260 , it would prefer to link to player @xmath205 rather than player @xmath196 . in particular , this is also true for every node @xmath207 . therefore , as soon as every member in @xmath198 played once , the star will be empty and no additional star will raise again . therefore , there will be at most one star left in the network . this completes the proof on the momentarily structure of the network . note that if @xmath261 we obtain the optimal stable solution . \b ) since every minor player has either two or three links , the contribution to the social cost due to minor players links is @xmath262 while the contribution to the social costs due to the inter - distances between minor players is @xmath263 . in the limit @xmath153 , the dominant term in the cost function is the term proportional to @xmath264 . both @xmath8 and @xmath22 for @xmath86 are bounded by @xmath265 , and comparing this results with the optimal social cost ( proposition [ lem : reliable optimal 1 ] ) we have @xmath266 with @xmath192 in the limit @xmath153 . \c ) the discussion of case 2 shows that in a large network , it is suboptimal for a minor player to be a member of @xmath198 . given the the opportunity , it will prefer to become a member in either @xmath197 or @xmath201 . therefore , after every player has played at least twice , @xmath267 , and after every player has played four times the system will reach equilibrium . lemma 13 in @xcite then shows that the probability that the system has not converged by turn @xmath193 decays exponentially with @xmath193 . the optimal stable network , as described in theorem [ thm : symmetric dynamic ] . ] in section [ sec : static - analysis ] we emphasized the importance of symmetry in the reliability requirements for reducing the price of anarchy . the next theorem affirms this assertion , and shows that if the constraints are asymmetric , the system converges to a state with an unbounded social cost on a large set of possible dynamics and initial conditions . [ thm : dynamic asymetric]assume asymmetric reliability requirements , namely @xmath110 . if the players follow dynamic rules # 1 and either dynamic rule # 2a or # 2b , then the system converges to a state with an unbounded social cost . the idea behind the proof is to show that the reliability requirements of at least one minor player remain unsatisfied , the therefore the social costs , as a sum over individual costs , is unbounded . first assume that @xmath268 . we shall now show that at any given turn , the network is composed of a type - a ( possibly empty ) clique , a set of type - b players @xmath269 linked to player @xmath95 , acting as a star center , and an additional ( possibly empty ) set of type - b players @xmath201 connected to the type - a player @xmath190 . player @xmath95 is also connected to player @xmath190 . some major player may establish links with the star center @xmath270 the set of these major players is denoted by @xmath271 . note that the cost of every player in either @xmath269 or @xmath201 is @xmath272 , since every path from each of these players to the type - a clique crosses player @xmath190 . we prove by induction . at turn @xmath273 , this is certainly true . denote the active player at time @xmath193 as @xmath274 consider the following cases : \1 . @xmath211 : since @xmath275 all links to the other type - a nodes will be established or maintained , if @xmath210 is already connected to the network . clearly , the optimal link in @xmath210 s concern is the link with the star center @xmath95 . therefore , player @xmath210 will attempt to establish the link @xmath276 if @xmath277 is negative . if @xmath278 or that @xmath279 then @xmath95 will accept this link . regardless , if player @xmath210 has formed the link it will not establish a link with @xmath280 , as it only reduces its distance to player @xmath2 by a single hop , and @xmath281 if eq . [ eq : term1 ] is positive , then , player @xmath210 has no incentive to establish a link with any @xmath280 , as @xmath282 and the by establishing @xmath283 the sole change is the reduction of @xmath284 from @xmath265 to @xmath195 , @xmath285 eq . [ eq : no single hop ] also shows that if @xmath286 , it will not form a link with @xmath287 , while if @xmath288 it may not remove the link @xmath289 as otherwise @xmath2 is disconnected . @xmath290 : first , assume that @xmath210 is a newly arrived player , hence it is disconnected . obviously , in its concern , a link to the star s center , player @xmath95 , is preferred over a link to any other type - b player . similarly , a link to a player @xmath190 is preferred over a link to any other type - a player ( or if @xmath291 and @xmath292 , equivalent to a link to any other type - a player ) . therefore , @xmath210 first link choice would be either @xmath293 or @xmath276 . in other words , @xmath249 or @xmath294 . if @xmath249 , than no @xmath80 will agree to establish a link with @xmath210 , as it only reduces its distance from @xmath210 by one hop , and does nt alter @xmath114 for any other @xmath95 similarly , if @xmath294 than @xmath295 and the link would not be formed . likewise , no link between @xmath287 and @xmath296 may be formed , as @xmath297 \3 . @xmath298 , the star s center : @xmath210 may not remove any edge connected to a type - b player and render the graph disconnected . on the other hand , the previous discussion shows it will not establish additional links to nodes in @xmath201 . note that the reliability requirements of players in @xmath299 are invalidated . therefore , the cost of every player @xmath300 is at least @xmath301 , and we have @xmath302 . hence , at any given turn , as soon as either @xmath303 and @xmath282 , the social cost is unbounded . if @xmath304 a link between player @xmath80 and player @xmath228 will be formed . however , as soon as player @xmath2 becomes the active player , it is beneficial for it to remove the link @xmath283 and establish a link to the star center @xmath94 instead . therefore , after player @xmath2 s turn , the cost of player @xmath210 is again @xmath305 . in a similar fashion , if @xmath306 than player @xmath280 and player @xmath307 may establish the link @xmath4 . this does not affect any other player and while it may reduce their costs , it does not provide them with two disjoint paths to the type - a clique , as they both must traverse player @xmath190 in order to access it . therefore , their costs is still @xmath305 . although , at first sight , it might seem that this result is due to the greedy and myopic choice of edges , it is possible to show that there are cases in which this result holds even when players may pick their links strategically rather than in a greedy manner . for example , if @xmath268 and the number of minor players is odd , than a similar analysis shows that a player in @xmath308 will establish a link to a single player in @xmath201 . however , as the number of minor players is odd , there will always be an unmatched player in either @xmath201 or @xmath269 and its cost will be @xmath305 . recall that under the presence of monetary transfers , players @xmath2 and @xmath3 will agree to establish an edge if @xmath309 . nevertheless , it may be that during the active player turn there are a few links that satisfy this condition , and the player _ _ must prioritize them . each player s decision is myopic , and is based solely on the current state of the network . hence , the order of establishing links is potentially important . needless to say , a player s preference order will depend on the link prices . while there are several alternatives , we adopt the following preference order @xcite : denote the active player as player @xmath2 . each link @xmath4 carries different utility in player @xmath310 respect . it is reasonable to assume that a link with a lower connection value will be priced lower , so that the link with the least connection utility will be marked with the lowest price . in fact , one may assume its price will be as much as the implied cost of the other party of this link . we will denote this price as @xmath311 . every other player @xmath95 will use this value and demand an additional payment from player @xmath2 for the link @xmath94 , as it is more beneficial for player @xmath2 . formally : `` strategic '' pricing mechanism : set @xmath312 as the node that maximizes @xmath313 . set @xmath314 . finally , set @xmath315 the price that player @xmath3 requires in order to establish _ @xmath4 _ is _ _ @xmath316 . under this pricing mechanism , there could be many links that carry the same utility . some of these links have a better connection value , but they come at a higher price . since all the links carry the same utility , we need to decide on some preference mechanism for player @xmath2 . the simplest one is the `` cheap '' choice , in which , if there are a few equivalent links , the player will choose the cheapest one . this can be a reasonable choice , as new players can not spend too much resources , and therefore they will choose the `` cheapest '' option that belongs to the set of links with maximal utility . preference order : player @xmath2 will establish links with player @xmath3 if player @xmath3 minimizes @xmath317 and @xmath318 . if there are several players that minimize @xmath319 , then player @xmath2 will establish a link with a player that minimizes @xmath56 . if there are several players that satisfy the previous condition , then one out of them is chosen randomly . we are now at a position to identify an additional network motif , namely , the `` entangled cycles '' . this network motif is composed of a line ( i.e. , interconnected sequence ) of minor players nodes , with some cross - links between the nodes along this line , breaking the hierarchy ( fig . [ fig : the - entangled - loops ] ) . the `` entangled cycle '' of length three is the `` feedback loop '' motif , which was previously found to exist in a higher frequency than expected in the internet graph @xcite . the `` entangled cycles '' motif . a ) six minor player are connected in an `` entangled cycles '' subgraph . the first two nodes have direct connection to some major player , and access the rest of the network by the major player s additional links , represented by the dotted line . b ) if at some point , a link between a player in this subgraph and some external player is formed ( in this example , a major player ) , some links may be removed without violating the reliability requirement and without increasing the distance cost appreciably . the removed links marked by a red x. ] when a new minor player arrives , it will choose the two cheapest links and will connect to the corresponding players . clearly , its costs due to the distance from the rest of the network will be the highest . as such , when the next player arrives , it will offer the lowest link price . the new arrival will link to it and to one of its provider . the process will repeat , until , at some point , an existing player will decide that this growing branch is too far from it , and will connect to one of the nodes along this `` entangled cycles '' . at this point , this subgraph will be over - saturated with links as players may utilize this link to access the internet core . hence , some links will be removed ( see , for example fig . [ fig : the - entangled - loops](b ) ) . the set of the links that will be removed depends heavily on the playing order and the temporary network structure . nevertheless , some cross - links may remain in order to satisfy reliability constrains . this explains the following result . [ thm : entangled cycles motif]assume the number of major players is at least 10 . denote the distance cost of player @xmath320 @xmath20 , as @xmath321 , namely @xmath322 assume that a subset @xmath323 of minor player first join the game and play consecutively and that the two players with the maximal distance cost are adjacent . then : \a ) these players will form an `` entangled cycles '' structure of length @xmath165 , as depicted in fig . [ fig : the - entangled - loops ] , and @xmath324 \b ) the entangled cycles structure is semi - stable , in the following sense : if , at some later turn , there exist players @xmath325 , @xmath326 such that the link @xmath4 is formed ( fig . [ fig : the - entangled - loops](b ) ) , then some links in the `` entangled cycles '' structure may be removed in subsequent turns . \a ) assume that at time @xmath193 a subset of @xmath327 minor players first join the game . denote the set of players that are currently connected to the network by @xmath178 . we denote by @xmath328 ( @xmath329 the number of type a players ( correspondingly , type - b player ) at that moment . let us denote the players with the highest distance cost term as @xmath127 and @xmath330 , namely , @xmath331 where for simplicity we assumed that @xmath332 are minor player ( type - b players ) . according to the `` strategic '' pricing mechanism a new player will establish links with these players , as they will offer the cheapest links . note that by connecting to these players , its survivability requirements are satisfied , as each of these players maintain two disjoint path to every major player ( if the reliability requirements are asymmetric ) or to all other players ( in case of symmetric reliability requirements ) . we are now going to prove by induction that player @xmath333 will first connect to players @xmath334 and @xmath335 . we shall prove by this by proving that the distance costs of @xmath334 and @xmath335 are maximal . first , note that for every player @xmath336 , we have @xmath337 and @xmath338 , since the path from @xmath3 to every player in @xmath178 pass through @xmath339 or @xmath340 , and @xmath341 . therefore , in order to show that players @xmath334 and @xmath335 have the highest distance cost , it is sufficient to show that @xmath342 for every @xmath343 . for every player @xmath344 we have @xmath345 since the path that connects player @xmath334 to the any player @xmath346 crosses either player @xmath127 or @xmath347 , which are adjacent . therefore , the distance cost of player @xmath334 due to its distance from every player @xmath346 , denoted by @xmath348 is at least grater than the corresponding distance cost of player @xmath127 , @xmath349 by at least @xmath350 . note that @xmath351 for every @xmath343 according to the definition of @xmath127 . however , player @xmath339 may be closer to players @xmath352 than player @xmath353 . denote the maximal distance between any two players by @xmath274 we have , @xmath354 where @xmath210 is the maximal distance between two players . in proposition [ prop : max distance ] it was shown that @xmath355 hence , @xmath354 as @xmath356 this expression is positive . hence , links will be established as stated . this shows that at the time player @xmath333 joins the game , the distance cost of player @xmath334 is maximal . a similar calculation shows that at this turn , the distance cost @xmath357 is maximal in the set @xmath358 . we have thus far shown that the first two links of a new player @xmath333 are to players @xmath334 and @xmath335 . nevertheless , as the `` entangled cycles '' motif grows , the incentive of other players to connect to players in it increases . at some point , player @xmath3 may be able to form links with players not in @xmath323 , or an active player @xmath359 may decide to connect to some player in @xmath323 ( or vice versa for @xmath360 ) . in either of these cases , players in the `` entangled cycles '' motif may have three disjoint paths to other players , and may therefore remove a link , should they deemed to do so . in this case , the `` entangled cycles '' motif will be diluted . this theorem shows that reliability is a major factor in breaking up tree hierarchy in the internet . in addition , it also hints that the hierarchical structure does not break frequently in the top levels of the internet , but rather mostly in the intermediate and lower tiers . note that according to theorem [ thm : entangled cycles motif](b ) , in large networks the length of the `` entangled motifs '' is short . therefore , we do not expect to see excessively long structures , but rather small ones , having just a few ass . in this section we compare our theoretical predictions with the real - world inter - as topology graph @xcite . we classified ass to major players and minor players according the popular caida ranking @xcite . for the sake of comparison with previous work @xcite , we classified the major players as the top 100 ass according to this ranking . the mean length of the shortest cycle connecting a major player and a minor player as function of time , from january 2006 to october 2008 . the length decrease as time passes and the network grows , in agreement with our model . ] in section [ sec : monetary - transfers ] , we showed that , by allowing monetary transfers , the maximal cycle length connecting a major player to a minor player depends inversely on the number of major players . as the number of ass increases in time , it is reasonable that the number of major player grows as well . hence , we expect that the length of the shortest cycle connecting a major player to a minor player will decrease in time . [ fig : the - mean cycle - length ] shows the mean cycle length connecting one of the secondary leading 2000 ass , ranked 101 - 2100 in caida ranking , and one of the top 100 nodes . the steady decline of the cycle s length in time is predicted by our model . the ratio of the mean number of disjoint paths connecting a minor player to the core to the mean degree of a minor player . this ratio is above @xmath361 , and increases in time , showing that additional links are likely to part of disjoint paths to the core . this ratio is presented as a function of time from january 2006 to october 2008 . ] our analysis showed that in most of the generated topologies , the minor players are organized in small subgraphs that have direct connection to the internet core , namely the major players clique , or the tier-1 subgraph , in agreement with @xcite . in order to maintain a reliable connection , in each subgraph there must be at least two links that connect minor players to the core . indeed , we have found out that the ratio between the mean number of disjoint paths from a minor player to the core and the mean degree of minor players is more than @xmath361 , and it increases in time ( fig . [ fig : disjoint path ratio ] ) . that is , almost every outgoing link of a minor player is used to provide it with an additional , disjoint path to the core . in other words , a player is more likely to establish an additional link , hence increase its degree , if it supplies it with a new path to the core that does not intersect its current paths . in section [ sec : dynamic - analysis ] we predicted the ubiquity of two network motifs , the `` double star '' motif ( fig . [ fig : generalized star 2 ] ) and the `` entangled cycles '' motif ( fig . [ fig : the - entangled - loops ] ) . we define the occurrence of a `` double star '' motif as the existence of a a connected pair of nodes , each with degree greater than @xmath184 , designated as the centers , such that at least @xmath184 neighbors of one center are also neighbors of the other center . we generated random networks according to the configuration model ( cm ) , in which each node is given a number of stubs according to its degree , and stubs are connected uniformly . then , we evaluated the mean number of occurrences of this motif in a random cm network with the same number of nodes and the same degree distribution as the real inter - as topology . for @xmath362 , we have found @xmath363 occurrences in the real - world inter - as topology , whereas the mean number of occurrences in the random cm network was only * @xmath364 * instances ( the @xmath365 indicates standard deviation ) . namely , there are more than four times displays of this subgraph in the internet than in a random network with the same degree distribution . chebyshev s inequality provides a bound on the _ p - value , @xmath366 . _ this low value indicates that it is highly unlikely that a random cm network explains the frequent appearance of this network motif . we have tested the prevalence of this motif with other values of @xmath184 and the number of occurrences is consistently a few times more than expected in a random cm network . our analysis suggests that reliability considerations is one of the factors leading to the increased number of incidents . the unexpected prevalence of the `` feedback loop '' , which is a special case of the `` entangled cycles '' motif , was first reported in @xcite . the `` feedback loop '' motif coincides with the entangled cycles motif of length three , and in order to further assess our results we tested for the occurrence frequency of the `` entangled cycles '' motif of length four . we compared the number of occurrences of this motif in the real - world internet graph to the expected number of occurrences in a random configuration model network . while the number of instances of this motif in the internet graph was @xmath367 , the expected number of occurrences in the random network was only @xmath368 . as before , the abundance of this network motif , an order of magnitude greater than expected ( _ @xmath369 _ , a relaxed bound based on chebyshev s inequality ) provides a positive indication to the implications of survivability requirements . in summary , we have provided both static and dynamic empirical evidence that conform with our predictions , suggesting the importance of reliability considerations on the structure and dynamics of the inter - as topology . while many studies have tried to model the internet structure , the list of works the explicitly address reliability considerations is much shorter . furthermore , most of the theoretical models of the internet structure and dynamics assume homogenous agents , while the internet is inherently heterogeneous , composed of a wide variety of entities with different business models . in this work , we found that constructing a model that includes these two factors , namely reliability and heterogeneity , may provide important insights on the internet structure and dynamics . we first rigorously formulated a model of a network formation game in this context . our model is flexible , and may be used in a wide variety of settings . it allows for many variations and schemes , for example situations in which failures are frequent or rare , or to account for varying centrality of different types of players . the homogeneity of the model also allows us to describe scenarios in which a fallback route is required only to a subset of players . indeed , a reasonable as policy is to require a backup routing path only to the internet backbone , rather than establishing fault - tolerant routing pathways to every particular autonomous system . we established the _ price of reliability , _ which measures the excess social cost that is required in order to maintain network survivability in an optimal stable equilibrium . surprisingly , we showed that it can be smaller than one , that is , that the additional survivability constraints _ add _ to the social utility . we have also showed that reliability requirements have disparate effects on different parts of the network . while it may support dilution in dense areas , it facilitates edges formation in sparse areas , and in particular it supports the formation of edges connecting minor players and major players . in our dynamic analysis we have found the repetitive appearance of small sub - graphs , or network motifs , namely the `` entangled cycles '' motif and the `` double star '' motif . indeed , the number of appearance of these motifs in the real inter - as topology surpassed the expected number by a few folds , indicating that additional factors support their formation , and as our analysis shows , survivability is one of them . we have also predicted that the length of the minimal cycle connecting a major player to a minor player should decrease in time . this prediction , too , was verified by a dynamic data analysis . finally , while our analysis focuses on the inter - as topology , it may be applied to other networks as well , that are composed of heterogeneous , rational agents that are required to maintain some reliability aspects . primary examples are trade networks and mvno operators in the cellular market . in this work we have shown that a game theoretic analysis of network formation , which encompasses heterogeneous agents and explicitly addresses survivability concerns , holds promising results . nevertheless , there are many open questions , such as the following . how does the emerging network handle more than a single failure ? which incentive mechanism will promote increased reliability of the future internet ? what can a comparative analysis of experimental results on different networks tell us about the players strategies in each network ? these , and many more , indicate that there is yet a lot to uncover in this intersection between network formation , heterogeneity and reliability . Abstract:
[ "we establish a network formation game for the internet s autonomous system ( as ) interconnection topology . the game includes different types of players , accounting for the heterogeneity of ass in the internet . we incorporate reliability considerations in the player s utility function , and analyze static properties of the game as well as its dynamic evolution . we provide dynamic analysis of its topological quantities , and explain the prevalence of some `` network motifs '' in the internet graph . we assess our predictions with real - world data . # 1" ]
13,722
13,722
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: over the past ten years , large ( supersymmetric ) extra dimensions have been subject to an increased attention , providing a simple framework for new cosmological ideas . motivated by scenarios such as the randall - sundrum model @xcite , physics in the presence of one extra dimension has been extensively analyzed and represents an interesting framework in which effects from the higher dimension can be understood . nevertheless , just as the dynamics of domain walls in a four - dimensional spacetime is in many ways very different to that of a cosmic string or point particle , the behavior of gravity near codimension - one branes is not representative of that around higher codimensional objects . models with two large extra dimensions , on the other hand , are capable of tracking some of the more interesting features of higher codimension objects , without introducing complications associated with higher - codimension branes . six - dimensional ( super)gravity is therefore a choice framework for the study of higher - dimensional effects , and presents remarkable features of its own . solutions of six - dimensional gravity , have been found in refs . @xcite , cosmological solutions in @xcite , and the stability of these models has been studied in @xcite . in six - dimensional supergravity , for instance , not only would the hierarchy problem be resolved if these dimensions had a submillimeter size @xcite , but if supersymmetry remained unbroken in the bulk at energies much lower that on the brane , the casimir energy could also be of the same order of magnitude as the observed four - dimensional cosmological constant , @xcite . another property of codimension - two objects relevant to the cosmological constant problem is their capacity of preserving a flat minkowski induced geometry in the presence of any tension , @xcite . codimension - two branes in the context of six - dimensional ( super)gravity can therefore provide potential resolutions of two of the most embarrassing problems of current particle physics and cosmology , namely the hierarchy and cosmological constant problems in scenarios where the weinberg s argument has different imports , @xcite . nevertheless , these models are faced with one great obstacle , the necessity of regularizing the brane before any question can be addressed , @xcite . distributional sources of matter on codimension - two and higher branes are indeed only well - defined as regularized objects , and one can therefore wonder whether any regularization - independent statement can even be made . from a field theory perspective , one expects the low - energy theory on such a brane to be independent of any high - energy regularization scheme , yet as of today , no regularization - invariant scheme has been proposed to study the effective theory on such branes . the only known work in this direction has been developed by goldberger and wise in 2001 ( see ref . @xcite ) , where it is pointed out that a field living on a six - dimensional flat spacetime will typically present a pathological behavior if coupling terms were to be introduced on a codimension - two surface . this pathology can however be removed by appropriate renormalization of the coupling constants . in this paper , we propose a direct extension to ref . @xcite , where we analyze couplings between bulk fields , free to live in the entire six dimensions , and brane fields , which are confined to codimension - two branes . the couplings between the two fields induce pathologies for both fields which can be absorbed by appropriate renormalization . similar ideas have been proposed as being useful for understanding black hole physics @xcite , post - newtonian corrections @xcite and brane localized kinetic terms @xcite . in what follows , we first review in section [ sectionii ] the problems arising when dealing with distributional sources on codimension - two branes , the regularization schemes that have been proposed in the literature as well as different sources of confusion which we clarify . we then explain the philosophy of our approach and discuss the main consequences . our strategy is applied in section [ section free theory ] , where a scalar field toy - model is considered . in particular , we analyze couplings between a bulk and a brane scalar field and discuss the renormalization procedure using two different techniques . the first one makes use of a conical cap to regularize the brane , while the other removes the divergences directly in the propagators . both methods give rise to the same renormalization group ( rg ) flows . this analysis is then extended to all possible relevant and marginal couplings in section [ sectioninteractions ] , where the three and four - point functions are computed as well as the loop diagrams . using these couplings , we also demonstrate that the theory is renormalizable . the second part of this paper is then dedicated to the physical implications . in section [ section em ] , we show how the same prescription remains valid when considering the more physical example of interactions between gravity and electromagnetism and finally explores the implications for localized kinetic terms on the brane which are relevant for models such as the dvali - gabadadze - porrati ( dgp ) in section [ section kinetic terms ] . we show how to make sense of kinetic couplings on the brane and deduce that only fixed functions of the kinetic terms are allowed by the renormalization procedure . after concluding in section [ section conclusion ] , we consider all possible local counterterms in appendix [ appendix ct ] and argue that no such counterterms can simultaneously absorb the bulk field divergences both in the bulk and on the brane , in complete agreement with our procedure . using the rg flows obtained for the brane couplings , we finish in appendix [ appendix generalcase ] by computing the arbitrary @xmath0-point function at all order in loops , and prove that it remains finite in the thin - brane limit , hence justifying that the theory is renormalizable against codimension - two divergences . in 1987 , geroch & traschen showed that strings and point particles do not belong to the class of metrics whose curvatures are well defined as distributions , @xcite . in their analysis , they considered a string in @xmath1-dimensions to be regularized as a cylinder of radius @xmath2 carrying energy density @xmath3 . the profile of the gravitational potential @xmath4 is obtained by solving poisson s equation @xmath5 , where @xmath3 vanishes outside the cylinder . although well - defined when the cylinder has a finite width @xmath2 , it turns out that the gravitational potential @xmath4 is not locally integrable in the thin - brane limit @xmath6 and so strings ( and point particles ) are not permitted as sources in @xmath1-dimensions , unless they are pure tension strings . issues arising from smoothing out codimension - two branes are also discussed in @xcite . despite the amount of attention branes have recently received , mainly motivated by string theory , the situation is unfortunately no different for those objects whose intrinsic codimension is equal or greater to two . from the string theory point of view , progress in these areas has mainly been achieved by neglecting the backreaction of such objects , treating them as test particles , the so - called probe - brane approximation . from a cosmological point view , however , such a procedure would miss some of their most important features and is hence not always satisfying . instead , much effort has been invested in specific regularizations of the theory , such as models arising from abelian - higgs theory , @xcite , thick brane regularizations , @xcite , capped branes , @xcite , intersecting branes , @xcite , codimension - two branes confined on codimension - one objects @xcite , etc ... in all of these examples , if the extra dimensions are compact or if an einstein - hilbert term is confined on the brane , one recovers four - dimensional gravity for the zero mode . however a logarithmic divergence appears in the first kaluza - klein mode as soon as the regularization mechanism is removed ( or the thin - brane limit is taken ) . understanding the significance of this divergence and the consequences for an observer on the brane represents the main objective of this paper . bulk fields away from a defect should be insensitive to the regularization procedure , but evaluating them on the defect itself requires knowledge of the internal structure of the defect . the philosophy of this paper is therefore to accept the presence of divergences in the thin - brane limit for bulk fields when evaluated on a codimension - two defect but to ensure that these divergences do not propagate into matter fields confined on the defect . we will show the validity of an effective field theory for such fields and present how observables on the brane remain finite after appropriate renormalization of the coupling constants . following the analysis of goldberger and wise @xcite , the brane - to - brane feynman propagator for a massless scalar field living in six - dimensional flat space - time with a conical singularity of deficit angle @xmath7 at @xmath8 is given by [ b - b prop ] d_k(0 ; 0)=-_0^ = - , where @xmath9 is the four - dimensional momentum along the brane direction , ( see eq . for more details . ) the brane - brane propagator is therefore divergent in the thin - brane limit for which the cutoff @xmath10 is sent to infinity ( or for large physical scale . ) in real space , on the other hand , the free propagator is finite outside the coincidence limit , and the presence of the logarithmic divergence in four - dimensional momentum space is merely a consequence to the fact that the gravitational potential of six - dimensional gravity behaves as @xmath11 in real space . more precisely , one can express the free brane - to - brane bulk propagator in real space as d(0,x;0,x)&= & _ 0^ + & = & _ 0^ = , where @xmath12 and @xmath13 represent directions tangent to the codimension - two brane and the two - point function is evaluated at @xmath8 along the normal direction . when the integral over the brane momentum @xmath9 is performed before that over the bulk momentum @xmath14 , the two - point function is finite everywhere . nevertheless , as soon as a source is considered at @xmath8 , the logarithmic behavior of the brane - brane two - point function in momentum space becomes relevant . this will be seen more concretely in what follows . we present here two general sources of confusion that usually appear when discovering these logarithmic divergences : * the first one is related to the nature of the divergence , and the order of magnitude at which it arises . any codimension - two object arises from an underlying theory ( abelian - higgs field theory , string theory or any other underlying theory ) which will naturally provide a regularization mechanism for the brane . we could hence argue that the notion of thin - brane limit is not physical and one should not be concerned about any thin - brane divergences . yet , such a argument would be going against the principles of effective field theory ( eft ) . even though the brane is expected to be regularized at some scale ( the string scale ) , we expect from eft that the low - energy physics is independent of the high - energy regularization mechanism . in other words , one should not need to understand the physics at string scale in order to understand and make predictions about the low - energy physics . * faced with this realization , one can hope that introducing brane localized counterterms should remove the logarithmic divergence present in without effecting the bulk propagator . unfortunately such an approach is too naive in this context , since brane - localized counterterms will not only affect the brane - brane propagator @xmath15 but also the brane - bulk @xmath16 and bulk - bulk propagators @xmath17 which were previously finite . any attempt to absorb the logarithmic divergence of the brane - brane propagator into brane localized counterterms will then automatically result in the introduction of further divergences . this argument is made more explicit in appendix [ appendix ct ] , where we consider the most general set of local counterterms ( that remain quadratic in the scalar field ) both in the bulk and on the brane , and show explicitly that no such counterterms will allow the propagator to be finite everywhere . in the philosophy we will follow , we will thus not attempt to make the bulk field propagator finite everywhere but will rather explore the consequences for observers on the brane . in a conical space - time , the propagator diverges at the tip of the cone . the aim of this paper is to explore the consequences for a scalar field living on the tip and coupled to a bulk field . we expect physically that 1 . bulk fields evaluated away from the brane should not depend on the regularization mechanism and thus be finite in the thin - brane limit . bulk fields evaluated on the brane itself are sensitive to the regularization procedure , since the position at which they are evaluated , the position of the brane , is dependent of the regularization . therefore we do not require bulk fields evaluated on the brane ( at @xmath8 ) to be finite in the thin - brane limit . brane fields , should have a well defined low - energy theory independent of the brane regularization . as long as the energy scales probed by an observer on the brane are much lower than that of the cutoff theory , the physics we will observe should be independent of the regularization , and hence finite in the thin - brane limit . in this paper , we will follow this philosophy carefully . the case of bulk fields with brane couplings was considered in @xcite . we here extend this analysis to matter fields confined to the brane and draw conclusions for brane observers . in this section we compute the propagator for scalar fields confined to a codimension - two brane and coupled with a bulk scalar field . we work in a six - dimensional flat space - time with a conical singularity located at @xmath8 : s^2=x^x^+r^2 + r^2 ^2 , with @xmath18 , and where @xmath19 is the deficit angle ( @xmath20 ) . a three - dimensional brane is located at the tip of the cone and @xmath21 represents the coordinates along the brane direction . we use the notation @xmath22 ; @xmath23 ; + @xmath24 and @xmath25 . this scalar field toy - model represents a good framework for the study of effective theories on codimension - two branes . the theory is composed of two coupled scalar fields , namely * the scalar field @xmath26 which symbolizes the bulk fields ( gravity , dilaton , gauge field ... ) and thus lives in six dimensions , * the brane field @xmath27 which symbolizes the matter fields living on the brane ( standard model ) and thus confined to a four - dimensional space - time . the action for this system can thus be taken to be of the form [ freeaction ] s=-^6 x @xmath28 $ ] , where for simplicity we have assumed the field @xmath26 to be massless in the bulk , but further extensions will be considered in section [ sectioninteractions ] . the coupling between the bulk and brane fields is symbolized by the term @xmath29 ( which can be set to zero ) . higher interactions will be considered in section [ sectioninteractions ] . to make contact with previous works in the literature , we first consider a specific thick - brane regularization mechanism , and show how the coupling constants can be renormalized in order for the theory to remain finite in the thin - brane limit . we then explore the renormalization mechanism in a more systematic way by analyzing the different classical two - point functions before turning to interactions and one - loop corrections in the following section . we point out that both methods will give rise to the same tree - level renomalized couplings . as a warm up , we follow a standard technique used in the literature to confine matter fields on a codimension - two brane , namely a thick - brane regularization in which the brane is no longer located at @xmath8 , but rather at @xmath30 . + the thin - brane limit is then recovered when @xmath31 . the action is regularized by [ regaction ] s=-^4 xr r & ( & 12 ( _ r ) ^2 + 12 ( _ ) ^2 + & & + ) , where for simplicity we omit for now any angular dependance . this leads to the following equations of motions : & & -_r(r (r))+k^2 = -@xmath32(r- ) + & & ( r- ) , [ bdycond ] @xmath33 being the eigenvalue of the four - dimensional dalembertian @xmath34 . integrating the first equation along the brane gives rise to the following jump condition : [ jump ] . r (r)|^^+_^-=-@xmath35 . one can solve for the bulk scalar field separately in the conical cap ( for @xmath36 ) and within the bulk ( @xmath37 ) . we choose the solution within the cap such that the scalar field remains finite at the tip @xmath8 . this leads to the following solutions ( r)=\ { lc a i_0 ( kr ) & r < + i_0 ( kr)+b k_0 ( k r ) & r > . , where @xmath38 and @xmath39 are the two modified bessel functions , or hyperbolic bessel functions , and @xmath40 remains finite as @xmath41 . for @xmath42 , we have set the coefficient of the divergent bessel function @xmath39 to zero , so that @xmath43 remains finite as @xmath44 . for @xmath37 , on the other hand , no such choice has been made and this solution is therefore independent of any other boundary conditions . these results will thus stand independently to any condition imposed on the fields away from the brane . the constants @xmath45 and @xmath46 are determined using the boundary condition and the jump condition . in the thin - brane limit , this leads to a&= & , + b&= & , where @xmath47 is the euler number , @xmath48 . for the bulk scalar field to be well - defined in the thin - brane limit , we require @xmath46 to remain finite when probing large physical scales @xmath49 . this will only be possible if the logarithmic divergence is reabsorbed into one of the coupling constants @xmath50 or @xmath51 . furthermore the scalar field @xmath27 should also be well - defined in that limit . this will thus be the case if both the following quantities remain finite b/&=&-(k^2+m^2 ) + ^-1&=&-(k^2+m^2)+ @xmath52@xmath53 . the logarithmic divergence can thus be absorbed into the coupling constants by arguing that their renormalized expression is related to their bare value by [ renormcouplingsthick ] _ 2= , = m^2=m_b^2 + , where the subscript @xmath54 represents the bare value , and @xmath3 is the physical scale . we therefore get the following renormalization group flows for the brane couplings [ rgflowthick ] = , = = . notice that we recover the same flow as ref . @xcite for the coupling @xmath55 which gives rise to a mass term for the bulk field on the brane . the renormalization of this coupling ensures that the bulk field to be finite away from the tip . however we wish to emphasize that this procedure does not get rid of the divergence of @xmath26 as @xmath56 . the point of the renormalization is to make sense of the bulk field away from the tip , however at the tip itself the bulk field diverges logarithmically as explained in section [ sectionii ] which is consistent with our philosophy . the key point here is that one can still make sense of the brane field @xmath27 ( @xmath27 is finite ) despite its coupling with @xmath26 . in other words , at low - energy , matter fields living on a codimension - two brane are independent of the regularization procedure , even though they couple to gravity and other bulk fields which are themselves ill - defined in the brane in the thin - brane limit . this is possible through adequate renormalization of the couplings . the renormalization for the coupling @xmath55 is already known from ref.@xcite . we show here how the renormalization is extended to the couplings for brane fields . in particular , we see that as soon as @xmath57 , the brane field acquires a mass . in this setup , we have used an artificial thick brane regularization . more fundamentally , we expect this defect to arise as the result of other fields ( abelian - higgs scalar and gauge field @xmath58 ) , providing a natural regularization . the fundamental theory is thus of the form = [ ] [ a _ ] [ ] [ ] e^i s_tot [ , a _ , , ] . the resulting field theory is obtained by integrating out the regularizing fields @xmath59 and @xmath60 . in this picture , we therefore expect that field loop integrations generate the same tree - level counterterms as those obtained in . in what follows , we shall recover the same results using a green s function approach , this uses the same technique as in @xcite . we will also discuss other interaction terms and show how the same renormalization procedures goes through , leading to a renormalizable theory . in this section we adopt a more field theoretic approach and require that the bulk - bulk propagator of the bulk field remains finite as well as the brane field propagator . we will proceed in three steps : 1 . we consider first of all the purely free theory for which the bulk and brane fields do not couple and all couplings vanish @xmath61 . in particular we recover the logarithmic divergence of the bulk field propagator when evaluated on the brane , but this divergence is only present in four - dimensional momentum space . we then consider the corrections to the bulk field propagators arising from the mass term @xmath55 on the brane . this situation is precisely that considered in @xcite , and we will follow the same approach . in particular , we will show how this brane coupling induces divergences in the bulk which can be removed by appropriate renormalization of the coupling @xmath55 , hence recovering the same result as in . we finally consider the corrections to both the bulk and brane field propagators induced by the coupling @xmath62 between the two fields . once again , these couplings will induce divergences which can be removed by renormalization of @xmath62 and @xmath63 , as in . \i ) _ free propagators _ + we concentrate first of all on the purely free theory given by the action [ freeaction2 ] s=-^4 xr r@xmath64 $ ] . the propagators for both fields satisfy r^(6d)_x d(x^a , x^a)&= & d(x^a , x^a)=i^(6)(x^a - x^a ) + _ x h(x^ , x^)&=&i^(4)(x^-x^ ) , where @xmath65 is the feynman propagator for @xmath26 and @xmath66 the one for @xmath27 . using a mixed - representation , momentum space along the directions @xmath21 and real space along the two extra dimensions , the propagators for both fields are simply [ bulk prop ] d_k(r , ; r, ) & = & -_n=-^+_0^ e^i n(-)j_|n|(q r)j_|n|(q r ) + h_k&=&- , where @xmath67 the bessel function of first kind , @xmath68 , and @xmath69 the four - dimensional momentum . notice that in this representation , in four - dimensional momentum space , the free propagator for @xmath26 is finite when at least one of the points is evaluated in the bulk ( @xmath17 and @xmath16 finite ) but it contains a logarithmic singularity when trying to evaluate both points on the brane . introducing a momentum cutoff scale @xmath10 in the evaluation of the propagator , one has [ b - b prop 2 ] d_k(0,0)=-_0^ = , which has the short distance singularity pointed out in @xcite . this divergence is usually not a problem since the two - point function is actually finite in real space , ( see section [ sectionii ] ) . however , as soon as a source is included at @xmath8 , the convolution of this two - point function will not be finite in real space . we therefore expect this divergence to affect the two - point function of both scalar fields when brane couplings are included . \ii ) _ corrections from the brane mass term @xmath55 _ + the previous two - point functions were that of the free theory for which the both fields were not coupled . we can now dress " these propagators with first of all the coupling @xmath55 : [ coupledaction ] s=-^4 xr r@xmath70 $ ] . ( 150,30)(-15,35)(0,51)(0,0)*@xmath71 * ( 40,60)(0,0)@xmath72 ( 40,50 ) ( 40,50)(3,0)10 ( 70,50 ) ( 70,60)(0,0)@xmath73 ( 85,49.5)(0,0)@xmath74 ( 100,60)(0,0)@xmath72 ( 100,50 ) ( 100,50)(10,0)3(1,0)7 ( 130,50 ) ( 130,60)(0,0)@xmath73 ( 140,49.5)(0,0)@xmath75 ( 155,60)(0,0)@xmath72 ( 155,50 ) ( 155,50)(10,0)3(1,0)7 ( 185,50)(10,0)3(1,0)7 ( 215,50 ) ( 215,60)(0,0)@xmath73 ( 185,60)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 185,50 ) ( 215,50 ) ( 185,40)(0,0)@xmath55 ( 230,50)(0,0)@xmath77 ( 245,60)(0,0)@xmath72 ( 245,50 ) ( 245,50)(10,0)3(1,0)7 ( 275,50)(10,0)3(1,0)7 ( 305,50)(10,0)3(1,0)7 ( 335,50 ) ( 335,60)(0,0)@xmath73 ( 305,60)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 275,60)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 305,50 ) ( 275,50 ) ( 305,40)(0,0)@xmath55 ( 275,40)(0,0)@xmath55 ( 350,51)(0,0)@xmath77 ( 370,50)(0,0)@xmath78 the propagator for the brane field @xmath27 remains unaffected while that for the bulk field @xmath26 gets modified to d_k(r , r)&=&d_k(r , r)-i_2 d_k(r,0 ) d_k(0,r)+ i^2_2 ^ 2 d_k(0,0 ) d_k(r,0 ) d_k(0,r)+ + & = & d_k(r , r)- d_k(r,0 ) d_k(0,r ) , as symbolized in fig . [ figlamdba2 ] . if @xmath15 was finite , this bulk field propagator would be finite at tree level as one should expect from usual field theory . in the presented case , the logarithmic divergence of @xmath15 needs to be absorbed in the coupling constant @xmath55 in the following way : [ lambda2 renorm ] _ 2()= , so that this coupling constant flows as = . we point out that this renormalization ensures the two - point function @xmath79 to be finite away from the brane . however , both the bulk - brane and the brane - brane two point functions remain ill - defined : both @xmath80 and @xmath81 contains a logarithmic dependence . once again , this is to be expected since evaluating the bulk two - point function on the brane requires knowledge about the exact brane position ( see section [ sectionii ] ) . \iii ) _ corrections from the coupling between the two fields _ + finally , we consider the corrections to these propagators arising from the coupling @xmath62 between the bulk and brane fields : [ coupledaction2 ] s=-^4 xr r@xmath82 $ ] . the tree level green s functions for this coupled theory are symbolically represented in fig . [ treelevel ] . ( 150,40)(20,-5 ) ( 5,60)(0,0)@xmath72 ( 5,50 ) ( 5,50)(3,0)15 ( 27.5,50 ) ( 50,50 ) ( 50,60)(0,0)@xmath73 ( 65,49.5)(0,0)@xmath74 ( 80,60)(0,0)@xmath72 ( 80,50 ) ( 80,50)(3,0)15 ( 125,50 ) ( 125,60)(0,0)@xmath73 ( 140,49.5)(0,0)@xmath77 ( 155,60)(0,0)@xmath72 ( 155,50 ) ( 155,50)(3,0)10 ( 185,49.5)(1,0)30 ( 215,50)(3,0)10 ( 245,50 ) ( 245,60)(0,0)@xmath73 ( 185,60)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 215,60)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 185,50 ) ( 215,50 ) ( 185,40)(0,0)@xmath62 ( 215,40)(0,0)@xmath62 ( 260,50)(0,0)@xmath77 ( 275,60)(0,0)@xmath72 ( 275,50 ) ( 275,50)(3,0)10 ( 335,50)(3,0)10 ( 395,50)(3,0)10 ( 305,50)(1,0)30 ( 365,50)(1,0)30 ( 425,50 ) ( 425,60)(0,0)@xmath73 ( 305,60)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 335,60)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 365,60)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 395,60)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 305,50 ) ( 335,50 ) ( 365,50 ) ( 395,50 ) ( 305,40)(0,0)@xmath62 ( 335,40)(0,0)@xmath62 ( 365,40)(0,0)@xmath62 ( 395,40)(0,0)@xmath62 ( 440,51)(0,0)@xmath77 ( 460,50)(0,0)@xmath78 ( 5,0 ) ( 5,0.1)(1,0)45 ( 50,0 ) ( 27.5,0 ) ( 65,0.5)(0,0)@xmath74 ( 80,0 ) ( 80,0.1)(1,0)45 ( 125,0 ) ( 140,0.5)(0,0)@xmath77 ( 155,0 ) ( 155,0.1)(1,0)30 ( 185,10)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 230,10)(0,0)@xmath76 ( 185,0)(3,0)15 ( 230,0.1)(1,0)30 ( 260,0 ) ( 185,-10)(0,0)@xmath62 ( 230,-10)(0,0)@xmath62 ( 185,0 ) ( 230,0 ) ( 207.5,0 ) + by summing these diagrams , we obtain the following tree - level green s functions g^_k(r , r ) & = & d_k(r , r)-^2 d_k(r,0)d_k(0,r ) h_k _ n0(-^2)^nd_k(0,0)^n h_k^n + & = & d_k(r , r)-d_k(r,0)d_k(0,r ) + & = & d_k(r , r)-d_k(r,0 ) d_k(0,r ) + g^_k&=&h_k@xmath83= + & = & . notice that there is now also a mixed two - point function for the bulk and brane fields : g^_k(r)=(r ) , = - . here again , if @xmath15 was finite , both green s functions would be finite at the tree level as one expects in usual field theory . in the presented case , the logarithmic divergence of @xmath15 needs to be absorbed in the coupling constants . these propagators will thus remain finite in the thin brane limit ( for @xmath84 ) , provided the coupling constants are renormalized as follows : [ renormcouplings ] _ 2()= , ( ) = , + [ renormcouplingsm ] m^2()=m^2()- , leading to the following rg flows = , = = . we therefore recover precisely the same relations between the bare and renormalized coupling constants as in the thick brane analysis and the same rg flows . this is a non - trivial check of our prescription . notice that @xmath85 , @xmath86 and @xmath87 are still divergent in the four - momentum representation , but the two - point function of the brane field @xmath88 has been made completely finite , and so are @xmath89 and @xmath90 , for @xmath91 . in summary , we find that by renormalizing the tree - level theory , the propagators of the field on the branes are finite , and the propagator in the bulk are only divergent when one point is evaluated on the brane ( and in the coincident limit ) . thus there is a consistent effective field theory on the brane and matter can be considered on a codimension - two brane in a completely meaningful regularization - invariant way . this will have important implications for observers on such a brane . before attacking this argument , let us consider in what follows all possible relevant and marginal interactions between a bulk and a brane field . we consider here an extension of the precedent toy - model where further couplings are taken into account . the effective field theory approach will remain completely consistent after the appropriate tree - level renormalization of the couplings . we also expect uv divergences to be present in loop corrections , but these can be dealt with through the usual uv renormalization mechanism . in order to avoid issues related to the uv divergences , ( which are independent of the fact that we consider a codimension - two brane ) , we restrict ourselves to the relevant and marginal operators . the most general brane interactions are then s=-^6x , with ^int_= _ 3 ^3 + _ 4 ^4+_3 ^2 , where the coupling @xmath92 is relevant while @xmath93 and @xmath94 are marginal . for each diagram in this theory , we expect two sorts of divergences to arise : * the ones associated with the usual uv divergences which appear in four dimensions when integrating over loops , * the short - distance divergences associated with the thin - brane limit . from standard four - dimensional eft , it is a well - known fact that the interactions of the type @xmath95 will induce uv divergences in the one - loop correction of both the two - point function and the four - point functions . these divergences can be absorbed by renormalization of the mass @xmath63 , the coupling @xmath93 as well as the wave - function . however , such divergences can be treated in a completely independent way to that arising at the tree - level in our codimension - two scenario . interactions of the form @xmath96 , for instance will typically induce divergences in the thin - brane limit which can be absorbed by appropriate renormalization of the coupling @xmath97 , this will be studied in the three - point functions in what follows . ( 150,80)(0,-40 ) ( -10,60)(0,0)@xmath98 ( 35,60)(1,0)30 ( 75,65)(2,1)20 ( 75,55)(2,-1)20 ( 50,60 ) ( 85,70 ) ( 85,50 ) ( 25,60)(0,0)@xmath74 ( 110,60)(0,0)@xmath74 ( 130,60)(0,0)@xmath99 ( 230,60)(0,0)@xmath100 ( 350,60)(0,0)@xmath101 ( 145,60)(1,0)30 ( 175,60)(1,1)15 ( 175,60)(1,-1)15 ( 160,60 ) ( 183,68 ) ( 183,52 ) ( 260,60)(1,0)15 ( 268,60 ) ( 290,60)(1,1)15 ( 290,60)(1,-1)15 ( 298,68 ) ( 298,52 ) ( 65,55)(0,1)10 ( 75,55)(0,1)10 ( 65,55)(1,0)10 ( 65,65)(1,0)10 ( 275,60)(3,0)6 ( -10,-10)(0,0)@xmath102 ( 75,-5)(2,1)20 ( 75,-15)(2,-1)20 ( 85,0 ) ( 85,-20 ) ( 25,-10)(0,0)@xmath74 ( 110,-10)(0,0)@xmath74 ( 145,-10)(3,0)7 ( 154,-10 ) ( 35,-10)(3,0)10 ( 50,-10 ) ( 330,-10)(3,0)7 ( 339,-10 ) ( 130,-10)(0,0)@xmath99 ( 225,-10)(0,0)@xmath103 ( 310,-10)(0,0)@xmath104 ( 415,-10)(0,0)@xmath77 perm.@xmath105 ( 165,-10)(1,0)15 ( 180,-10)(1,1)15 ( 180,-10)(1,-1)15 ( 188,-2.5 ) ( 188,-17.5 ) ( 265,-10)(1,1)15 ( 265,-10)(1,-1)15 ( 273,-2.5 ) ( 273,-17.5 ) ( 350,-10)(1,0)10 ( 360,-9.5)(1.5,1.5)5 ( 367,-2)(1,1)10 ( 360,-10)(1,-1)15 ( 372,2.5 ) ( 368,-17.5 ) ( 65,-15)(0,1)10 ( 75,-15)(0,1)10 ( 65,-15)(1,0)10 ( 65,-5)(1,0)10 ( 245,-9.5)(3,0)7 ( 254,-10 ) the diagrams involved in the three - point functions are summarized in fig . [ 3pt ] . summing these diagrams , we get , for @xmath106 , g^_k_1 , k_2 , k_3&=&_k_1 _ k_2 _ k_3 + & = & ( -i)@xmath107 + g^_k_1 , k_2 , k_3(r)&= & _ k_1(r ) _ k_2 _ k_3 + & = & ( -i)(6 _ 3 g^_k_1(r)g^_k_2g^_k_3 + 2_3 g^_k_1(r,0 ) g^_k_2g^_k_3 + & & + 2 _ 3g^_k_1(r)@xmath108 ) , where the factor @xmath109 arises from the first order expansion of @xmath110 . notice that after appropriate renormalization of @xmath62 , @xmath51 and @xmath55 , the propagators @xmath111 and @xmath112 have been made finite , however the bulk quantities evaluated on the brane @xmath113 and @xmath114 are a priori ill - defined . once again , this divergence would propagate into the three - point function for the brane field , had we not renormalized the couplings @xmath92 and @xmath94 . upon simplification of the previous expression , we find that the divergent part of @xmath115 is proportional to _ k_1 _ k_2 _ k_3_div & & @xmath116 , so that the coupling @xmath92 should be renormalized as [ beta3 ] _ 3()- d_k(0,0 ) + = _ 3()- , for any @xmath9 , and where we recall that the coupling @xmath62 has been renormalized in such a way that @xmath117 is finite ( see eqs . ( [ renormcouplings],[renormcouplingsm ] ) . ) the divergent part of @xmath118 is then proportional to _ k_1(r ) _ k_2 _ k_3_div & & . this divergence will thus be absorbed if the coupling @xmath94 is renormalized as [ rgflow3 ] _ 3()&= & , and so [ beta3_2 ] _ 3()=_3()+ , notice that this renormalization of @xmath94 is precisely the one that ensures the renormalized coupling @xmath92 in eq . to be independent of the four - momentum @xmath9 . after renormalization , the quantity @xmath119 is therefore finite [ 3ptfinite ] _ @xmath120=0 which corresponds to the following flows for @xmath92 and @xmath94 = = . once again , this tree - level renormalization leads to a perfectly well - defined notion of the three - point functions @xmath121 and @xmath122 , as long as @xmath72 is not evaluated on the brane and we work outside the coincidence limit . furthermore , this renormalization of these coupling constants @xmath92 and @xmath94 also ensures that the two additional three - point functions @xmath123 and @xmath124 are finite ( for @xmath125 ) . indeed , we have , for @xmath106 , & & g^_k_1,k_2,k_3(r_1,r_2)=_k_1(r_1 ) _ k_2(r_2)_k_3 + & & = -i(6 _ 3 g^_k_1(r_1 ) g^_k_2(r_2 ) g^_k_3 + 2 _ 3 g^_k_1(r_1 ) g^_k_2(r_2 ) g^_k_3(0 ) + & & + 2 _ 3 @xmath126 g^_k_3 ) + & & = -2i g^_k_3_i=1 ^ 2 g^_k_i(r_i)(3 _ 3 ( ) -_3 ( ) -_i=1 ^ 2 ) + & & = -2i g^_k_3_i=1 ^ 2 g^_k_i(r_i ) ( 3_3()-_3()_i=1 ^ 3 + & & + _ i=1 ^ 2 ) , which , in terms of the renormalized coupling constants , is clearly finite . the last three - point function can be expressed in a similar way : & & g^_k_1,k_2,k_3(r_1,r_2,r_3)=_k_1(r_1 ) _ k_2(r_2)_k_3(r_3 ) + & & = -i@xmath127(6 _ 3 + 2 _ 3 _ i=1 ^ 3 ) + & & = -2i @xmath127 _ i=1 ^ 3 , and is therefore also completely finite . this result is already non - trivial as it stands , since all four three - point functions have been made finite by simple tree - level renormalization of the two coupling constants @xmath92 and @xmath94 . we can however push this analysis even a step further by studying the implications for the four - point functions as well as the loop corrections to the two - point functions . the classical contributions to the four - point function @xmath128 are symbolically represented in fig . [ 4pt ] . summing these diagrams , we get for @xmath129 , & & g^_k_1,k_2,k_3,k_3= _ k_1 _ k_2_k_3_k_4 + & & = @xmath130,where we recall again that the factor @xmath109 and @xmath131 arise from the expansion to first order ( resp . second order ) of @xmath110 . the sum over perm@xmath132 is the one over the three permutations @xmath133 , for which @xmath134 . ( 150,90)(-10,-65)(-20,60)(0,0)[l]@xmath135 ( -20,-40)(0,0)[l]@xmath136 ( 60,60)(-1,1)10 ( 60,60)(-1,-1)10 ( 60,60)(1,1)10 ( 60,60)(1,-1)10 ( 55,55 ) ( 65,55 ) ( 55,65 ) ( 65,65 ) ( 165,60)(-1,1)10 ( 160,65 ) ( 165,60)(-1,-1)10 ( 160,55 ) ( 165,60)(1,0)15 ( 172,60 ) ( 180,60)(1,1)10 ( 185,65 ) ( 180,60)(1,-1)10 ( 185,55 ) ( 277,60)(-1,1)10 ( 277,60)(-1,-1)10 ( 277,60)(2,0)7(290,60)(1,0)10 ( 300,60)(1,1)10 ( 300,60)(1,-1)10 ( 272,55 ) ( 272,65 ) ( 295,60 ) ( 305,55 ) ( 305,65 ) ( 344,66)(-1,1)10 ( 350,60)(-1,-1)10 ( 350,60)(1,0)10 ( 360,60)(1,1)10 ( 360,60)(1,-1)10 ( 350,60)(-1,1)7(345,55 ) ( 340,70 ) ( 355,60 ) ( 365,55 ) ( 365,65 ) ( 334,76 ) ( 190,10)(-1,1)10 ( 190,10)(-1,-1)10 ( 190,10)(2,0)6(195,10)(200,10)(1,1)10 ( 200,10)(1,-1)10 ( 185,15)(185,5)(205,15)(205,5 ) ( 249,16)(-1,1)10 ( 255,10)(-1,-1)10 ( 255,10)(1,0)10 ( 265,10)(1,-1)10 ( 271,16)(1,1)10 ( 255,10)(-1,1)7(265,10)(1,1)7(250,5 ) ( 245,20 ) ( 260,10 ) ( 270,5 ) ( 275,20 ) ( 239,26 ) ( 281,26 ) ( 322,10)(-1,1)10 ( 322,10)(-1,-1)10 ( 322,10)(2,0)7(335,10)(1,0)10 ( 351,16)(1,1)10 ( 345,10)(1,-1)10 ( 317,5 ) ( 317,15 ) ( 340,10 ) ( 350,5 ) ( 355,20 ) ( 345,10)(1,1)7 ( 361,26 ) ( 30,60)(0,0 ) @xmath137 ( 87,50)(0,0)[l ] @xmath138 ( 70,60)(0,0)[l ] @xmath139 ( 133,60)(0,0 ) @xmath140 ( 230,60)(0,0)@xmath141 ( 320,60)(0,0)@xmath142 ( 385,60)(0,0)@xmath105 ( 130,10 ) ( 0,0)[l]@xmath143 ( 220,10)(0,0)[l]@xmath144 ( 290,10)(0,0)[l]@xmath144 ( 370,10)(0,0)[l]@xmath145 $ ] ( 60,-40)(-1,1)10 ( 60,-40)(-1,-1)10 ( 60,-40)(1,1)10 ( 60,-40)(1,-1)10 ( 55,-45 ) ( 65,-45 ) ( 55,-35 ) ( 65,-35 ) ( 140,-35)(-1,1)10 ( 140,-45)(-1,-1)10 ( 175,-35)(1,1)10 ( 175,-45)(1,-1)10 ( 150,-40)(1,0)15 ( 140,-35)(1,0)10(140,-45)(1,0)10(140,-35)(0,-1)10(150,-35)(0,-1)10 ( 165,-35)(1,0)10(165,-45)(1,0)10(165,-35)(0,-1)10(175,-35)(0,-1)10 ( 135,-30 ) ( 135,-50 ) ( 180,-30 ) ( 180,-50 ) ( 157,-40 ) ( 240,-40)(-1,1)10 ( 240,-40)(-1,-1)10 ( 240,-40)(2,0)6(250,-40)(1,1)10 ( 250,-40)(1,-1)10 ( 235,-35)(235,-45)(255,-35)(255,-45 ) ( 30,-40)(0,0 ) @xmath137 ( 87,-50)(0,0)[l ] @xmath138 ( 70,-40)(0,0)[l ] @xmath146 ( 190,-40 ) ( 0,0)[l]@xmath147 ( 270,-40 ) ( 0,0)[l]@xmath148 $ ] we now recall that the product of the two three - point functions @xmath149 is _ finite _ ( after appropriate renormalization of the couplings @xmath92 and @xmath94 in ) and is given by & & _ u= _ k_u_1_k_u_2_k_u_k_u_3_k_u_4_k_u + & & = -@xmath150 ^ 2@xmath151@xmath152 @xmath153 + & & = -(6 ^ 2 _ 3 ^ 2 g^_k_u+12 _ 3 _ 3 g^_k_u _ i=1 ^ 4 + 24 _ 3 _ 3 g^_k_u(0 ) + 4_3 ^ 2 g^_k_u(0)_i=1 ^ 4 + & & + 4 _ 3 ^ 2g^_k_u_i = u_1,u_2_j = u_3,u_4 + 4_3 ^ 2 ) g^_k_u @xmath130.as shown symbolically in fig . [ 4pt ] , after appropriate recombination of these different contributions , we can reexpress this four - point function as a finite product of these two renormalized three - point function plus a divergent piece which fixes the renormalization of the coupling @xmath93 : g^_k_1,k_2,k_3,k_4 & = & _ perm_u\{_u + 4(-i)^2_3 ^ 2@xmath130 } + & & + 4!(-i)_4@xmath154 + [ 4ptfunc ] & = & _ perm_u\{_u + @xmath154}. all terms in the previous expressions are finite apart from the ones in square brackets . the divergence of this term can once again be absorbed into @xmath93 using the following appropriate renormalization [ beta4 ] _ 4()-2_3 ^ 2()d_k(0,0)&= & _ 4()- + & = & _ 4()- , the renormalized coupling @xmath93 must flow as _ _ 4()=. in other words , as soon as cubic interactions between the bulk and the brane field are introduced , a quartic interaction for the brane field is spontaneously generated classically . this is familiar for standard eft . we can also carefully check using exactly the same technique as previously that this renormalization of the coupling @xmath93 also ensures that all remaining four - point functions @xmath155 , @xmath156 , @xmath157 and @xmath158 are completely finite classically ( provided the bulk field is evaluated away from the brane ) , g^_k_1,k_2,k_3,k_4(r ) & = & _ perm_u\ { g^_k_u_1,k_u_2,k_u(r)g^_k_u_3,k_u_4,k_u + & & -4g^_k_1(r)@xmath159 } + g^_k_1,k_2,k_3,k_4(r_1,r_2 ) & = & g^_k_1,k_2,k_1+k_2(r_1,r_2)g^_k_3,k_4,k_1+k_2 + & & + g^_k_1,k_3,k_1+k_3(r_1)g^_k_2,k_4,k_1+k_3(r_2 ) + ( 34 ) + & & -(4+(34 ) + & & + 4 ) @xmath160@xmath161g^_k_1,k_2,k_3,k_4(r_1,r_2,r_3 ) & = & _ perm_u\ { g^_k_u_1,k_u_2,k_u(r_u_1,r_u_2)g^_k_u_3,k_4,k_u(r_u_3 ) + & & -4@xmath162 g^_k_4 } + g^_k_1,k_2,k_3,k_4(r_1,r_2,r_3,r_4 ) & = & _ perm_u\ { g^_k_u_1,k_u_2,k_u(r_u_1,r_u_2)g^_k_u_3,k_u_4,k_u(r_u_3,r_u_4 ) + & & -4@xmath163 } . each of these four - point functions introduces a combination of the couplings which is completely finite once they have been renormalized as specified previously ( @xmath164 is finite ) . this non - trivial check ensures that our proposal makes sense at least at the classical level up to the four - point function . before discussion the general renormalizability of this theory for higher point functions , we present in what follows an insight into the situation at the quantum level , when loops are taken into account . at the loop level , we expect from standard field theory in four dimensions , that uv divergences will arise from the momentum integral over the loop . however no further divergences arise from the codimension - two nature of the theory , and the counterterms required to absorb the divergences are thus the usual one of four - dimensional field theory . to start with , we concentrate on the two - point function of the brane field @xmath27 . at first order in loops , ( second order for @xmath92 and @xmath94 ) one 1loop = _ loop(p , k ) g^_k g^_k , with the integrand @xmath165 being the sum over the different loop configurations : _ loop(p , k)&= & g^_pg^_k - p@xmath166 ^ 2 + & & g^_kg^_0@xmath167 ^ 2 + & & + 4 _ 3 ^ 2@xmath168 + ( -i)_4 g^_p , where for simplicity we have used the notation @xmath169 . this expression can be most easily interpreted as finite products of three - point functions and extra terms as symbolized in fig . [ figloops ] [ loop1 ] _ loop(p , k ) & = & -12 -12 + & & -2 g^_k - p -2g^_p + & & -2 g^_p . ( 150,100)(-50,-10)(-40,60)(0,0)[l]@xmath170 ( 125,60)(0,0)[l]@xmath171 ( 248,60)(0,0)[l]@xmath172 ( 20,10)(0,0)[l]@xmath171 ( 170,10)(0,0)[l]@xmath173 ( 365,60)(0,0)[l]@xmath148 $ ] ( 300,10)(0,0)[l]@xmath148 $ ] ( 65,60 ) ( 1,0)52 ( 91,68 ) ( 78,60 ) ( 104,60 ) ( 91,76 ) ( 180,60)(1,0)60 ( 210,60)(26,20)[t ] ( 186,60 ) ( 234,60 ) ( 210,70 ) ( 210,60 ) ( 196,60 ) ( 224,60 ) ( 192,56)(0,1)8 ( 200,56)(0,1)8 ( 192,56)(1,0)8 ( 192,64)(1,0)8 ( 220,56)(0,1)8 ( 228,56)(0,1)8 ( 220,56)(1,0)8 ( 220,64)(1,0)8 ( 315,60)(2,0)13(295,60)(1,0)20 ( 341,60)(1,0)20 ( 328,60)(26,20)[t ] ( 305,60 ) ( 328,70 ) ( 351,60 ) ( 90,0 ) ( 1,0)60 ( 120,0)(0,1)22 ( 120,30 ) ( 100,0 ) ( 140,0 ) ( 120,38 ) ( 120,11 ) ( 116,-4)(0,1)8 ( 124,-4)(0,1)8 ( 116,-4)(1,0)8 ( 116,4)(1,0)8 ( 116,18)(0,1)8 ( 124,18)(0,1)8 ( 116,18)(1,0)8 ( 116,26)(1,0)8 ( 120,0 ) ( 120,22)(220,0 ) ( 1,0)60 ( 250,30 ) ( 230,0 ) ( 270,0 ) ( 250,38 ) ( 250,0)(0,2)12 to clarify the discussion , we denote by @xmath10 , the cutoff scale associated with the codimension - two brane thickness , or equivalently with the integration over the momentum along the extra dimensions , while @xmath174 designates the standard four - dimensional momentum cut - off scale , in the loop integration is cutoff at the scale @xmath174 : @xmath175 . clearly these two scales could be associated with one another , simply representing the scale at which uv physics becomes important . however for sake of simplicity , we distinguish for now between these two quantities and assume that in general they could be different . in this scenario , the couplings are then flowing along two distinct directions @xmath10 and @xmath174 , and we focus our attention on the flow along the @xmath10 direction . on simple dimension grounds , we expect that the loop integral over @xmath176 will diverge logarithmically , and the one - loop contribution to the two - point function has thus a cutoff dependence of the form @xmath177 which should be absorbed by introduction of a mass counterterm of the form @xmath178 . this is standard procedure in four - dimensional field theory . we are however more concern here on the dependence of the other cutoff @xmath10 . @xmath94 and @xmath92 have been renormalized in , such that the three - point function @xmath121 is finite so the first line of is clearly finite . although the rest of expression includes divergent terms of the form @xmath179 , the combination involved @xmath180 $ ] is precisely the combination that appeared in the expression of four - point function ( [ 4ptfunc ] , [ beta4 ] ) , and is thus also finite . notice furthermore that the one - loop correction to the two remaining two - point functions @xmath181 and @xmath182 will be also be finite in the thin - brane limit ( once the loop divergences associated with @xmath174 have been taken care of ) , as shown explicitly for the four - point function . however a non - trivial feature emerges from the computation of the one - loop corrections . the expression involves terms of the form @xmath183 which also diverges logarithmically , but this time this divergence is instead associated with a ir behaviour . in this toy - model , the origin of this ir divergence is related to the fact that the bulk field @xmath26 is massless , but would disappear as soon as a small mass @xmath184 was introduced . however , if the bulk field is to mimic the graviton , this field should remain massless . physically , such ir divergences can be removed in the same way as in quantum electrodynamics , see ref . @xcite . to complete this section , we argue that this scalar field toy - model is renormalizable , provided that only relevant and marginal operators are considered . since no coupling of the form @xmath185 , @xmath186 is introduced , any further @xmath0-point function will necessarily be composed of only reducible diagrams and will thus be expressible in terms of lower - dimensional @xmath187-point functions ( @xmath188 . ) since we have shown that all of these @xmath187-point functions are finite at the classical level , any further @xmath0-point function will thus automatically be finite , without any further counterterms . we make this argument more concrete by exploring the five - point function , and showing explicitly that it remains finite in the thin - brane limit if @xmath93 is renormalized as in . a completely general argument for an arbitrary @xmath0-point function can be found in appendix [ appendix generalcase ] . in particular we show that the same will remains true at the level of any @xmath0-point function . the theory will thus be renormalizable , as one can expect from standard four - dimensional field theory intuition . the contributions to the five - point function are symbolized in fig.[fig5pt ] . ( 150,70)(-20,40)(-20,60)(0,0)[l]@xmath189 ( 130,60)(0,0)[l]@xmath190 ( 270,60)(0,0)[l]@xmath191 ( 360,60)(0,0)[l]@xmath148 $ ] ( 90,64 ) ( -1,1)10 ( 90,56 ) ( -1,-1)10 ( 94,60 ) ( 1,0)30 ( 114,60)(1,1)10 ( 114,60)(1,-1)10 ( 85,69 ) ( 85,51 ) ( 104,60 ) ( 120,60 ) ( 120,66 ) ( 120,54 ) ( 86,56)(0,1)8 ( 94,56)(0,1)8 ( 86,56)(1,0)8 ( 86,64)(1,0)8 ( 210,64 ) ( -1,1)10 ( 210,56 ) ( -1,-1)10 ( 234,64 ) ( 0,1)10 ( 258,64 ) ( 1,1)10 ( 258,56 ) ( 1,-1)10 ( 238,60 ) ( 1,0)16 ( 214,60 ) ( 1,0)16 ( 205,69 ) ( 205,51 ) ( 222,60 ) ( 234,69 ) ( 246,60 ) ( 263,69 ) ( 263,51 ) ( 206,56)(0,1)8 ( 214,56)(0,1)8 ( 206,56)(1,0)8 ( 206,64)(1,0)8 ( 230,56)(0,1)8 ( 238,56)(0,1)8 ( 230,56)(1,0)8 ( 230,64)(1,0)8 ( 254,56)(0,1)8 ( 262,56)(0,1)8 ( 254,56)(1,0)8 ( 254,64)(1,0)8 ( 320,64 ) ( -1,1)10 ( 320,56 ) ( -1,-1)10 ( 324,60 ) ( 1,0)15 ( 349,60)(1,1)10 ( 349,60)(1,-1)10 ( 339,60)(0,1)10 ( 315,69 ) ( 315,51 ) ( 331,60 ) ( 355,66 ) ( 355,54 ) ( 339,65 ) ( 316,56)(0,1)8 ( 324,56)(0,1)8 ( 316,56)(1,0)8 ( 316,64)(1,0)8 ( 339,60)(2,0)5 summing these diagrams , we obtain g^^5_k_1,,k_5&= & + & & + @xmath192g^_(k_4+k_5),k_4,k_5_i=1 ^ 3g^_k_i + & & = 5 ! ig^_(k_4+k_5 ) , k_4 , k_5 , where for simplicity we have used a specific momentum configuration , but the counting takes in account all possible permutations . the first line of the pervious expression is trivially finite , while the second line is finite only if the terms proportional to @xmath93 and @xmath193 contribute with appropriate coefficients . as can be seen in the third line of this expression , the contribution from these terms is also finite as @xmath93 is renormalized precisely so as to have @xmath194 finite . the five - point function is therefore finite at the classical level and no counterterms ought to be added . this result will remain valid for any other five - point functions ( including the ones with bulk external fields @xmath195 , etc . ) , as well as for any higher @xmath0-point function and their loop corrections , ( see appendix [ appendix generalcase ] ) . this represents a highly non - trivial check and leads to the conclusion that the theory is completely renormalizable against divergences associated with the codimension - two source . in this section , we consider the more physical scenario of a massless gauge field @xmath60 confined to the brane and coupled to gravity . this represents a more realistic framework to study the coupling between gravity and electromagnetism . we start with the following six - dimensional action s^(em)=^6 x , with @xmath196 . in what follows we work at linear order in perturbations around a flat conical background : s^2= g_a b x^a x^b = r^2+r^2 ^2+@xmath197x^x^ , where we work in de donder gauge , @xmath198 . since the stress - energy for radiation is transverse , we will have @xmath199 . the einstein s equations impose g_&= & ^2 t_^em + -12 ^(6 ) h_&= & -^2@xmath200 . using results from the previous sections , we know that @xmath201 will diverge logarithmically when evaluated at @xmath8 [ induced h ] h_(0)= @xmath202(f_f_^ -1 4 f^2 _ ) , where @xmath47 is the euler number and @xmath203 represents the thin - brane limit . this will affect the equation of motion for the photon : _ f^&=&@xmath204@xmath205@xmath206 + & = & [ maxwell1 ] _ f^-_@xmath207=0 , where in the second line , all index raising is performed with respect to the background flat metric @xmath208 . we remember that in the previous expression , @xmath209 represents the induced value of the metric perturbation evaluated on the brane and thus diverges logarithmically in the thin - brane limit . if this was the end of the story , then photons would be very sensitive to the brane thickness @xmath2 even at low - energy . however , we have learned from section [ section free theory ] , that as soon as a coupling @xmath62 is introduced between brane and bulk fields , this spontaneously generates a mass term @xmath63 for the brane field at the classical level . the situation is no different here , and the logarithmic divergence of @xmath210 on the brane will spontaneously generate @xmath211 terms on the brane . more precisely , let us consider the euler - heisenberg brane action s_(brane)=-x^4 , so that the maxwell s equations are modified to _ f^-_@xmath207-_1 _ @xmath212-_2 _ @xmath213=0 . substituting the expression for the perturbed metric on the brane , we obtain _ f^ & + & @xmath214-_1 _ @xmath215 + & -&@xmath216+_2 _ @xmath217=0 . the divergence of the graviton can thus be absorbed in the two couplings @xmath218 and @xmath219 : _ 1()=_1()+ and _ 2()=_2()- , leading to the following rg flows _ _ 1 ( ) = -1 4 _ _ 2 ( ) = . the generation of @xmath211 terms on the brane at the classical level ensures that a photon confined to a codimension - two brane and interacting with a gravitational wave will not evolve in a regularization - dependent way . in particular , this mechanisms ensures that at low - energy , there is a well defined thin - brane limit description of the codimension - two brane . of course once , @xmath211 terms are introduced , they will in turn introduce divergences on the brane , which should be absorbed with higher order terms . the proper finite theory will hence include a infinite series . as a last intriguing physical implication , we consider in this section the consequences for localized kinetic terms on the brane . localized kinetic terms are of importance when considering brane - induced einstein - hilbert terms , where the action is typically of the form s= ^d x r_(d ) + ^4 x @xmath220 . the induced einstein - hilbert term @xmath221 term is expected to be spontaneously generated at the quantum level , and represents a natural mechanism to localize gravity on a four - dimensional surface when the extra dimensions are flat and infinite @xcite . such models also represent a physical realization of the degravitation process ( see ref . @xcite ) , since in such scenarios gravity becomes fully higher - dimensional at long wavelengths , hence providing a potential explanation for the observed value of the cosmological constant . such models are also enriched with an additional interesting feature namely the possibility of having self - accelerating branches @xcite ( see refs . @xcite for ghost - free realizations ) . although such models are usually considered in the context of one large extra dimension , a simultaneous resolution of the hierarchy problem usually requires at least two extra dimensions @xcite , and the degravitation observed in the presence of only one extra dimension is only marginal . understanding this scenario in the presence of two extra dimensions is therefore an important next step . in what follows , we examine the consequences of such kinetic terms in a scalar field toy - model . we consider a massless scalar field @xmath26 living in a six - dimensional flat space - time with induced kinetic terms on a codimension - two brane s=-^6x , where @xmath222 represents the four - dimensional dalembertian @xmath223 . in order to recover on the brane the standard klein - gordon equation for the scalar field in the infrared , @xmath224 , we require that only positive powers of @xmath222 be present in @xmath225 . in particular we write f()= _ n0 c_n @xmath226^n , where @xmath227 is an arbitrary length scale ( we recall that in this six - dimensional formalism , @xmath26 has dimension mass squared and thus @xmath225 ought to be dimensionless ) . in particular , @xmath228 represents the dimensionless coupling @xmath55 that was considered in section [ section free theory ] . from that section , we know that the scalar field will be well - defined away from the brane only if the induced couplings on the brane ( in this case the function @xmath225 ) are renormalized and flow as _ f()=12 f^2 ( ) . in terms of the coefficients @xmath229 , this implies [ cn ] _ c_n()=12 _ u=0^n c_n - u()c_u ( ) . this has important consequences for these kind of theories , in particular , we are not free to choose a brane induced function of the form @xmath230 , as higher curvature terms will spontaneously be generated at the tree - level . as soon as a mass term @xmath228 and kinetic term @xmath231 are present , all the other couplings @xmath229 will flow in a non - trivial way . the solution for the two first terms is of the form c_0()&= & + c_1()&=&=c_0()^2 , where @xmath232 is a dimensionless parameter . as an example , one can choose a particular solution of , for which c_n()=^n c_0()^n+1 , and so f()=. notice that in this formalism , the function of the kinetic term is fixed by the renormalization conditions , and very few parameters can actually be tuned arbitrarily . in this sense this represents a much more satisfying candidate for theories of modified gravity than for instance @xmath233 gravities , ( see ref . @xcite for a review on such theories ) . as a natural extension , one should understand the cosmology for such a scenario and possibly the different signatures which could allow for the discrimination of codimension - two models . we have analyzed the coupling between bulk fields living in a six - dimensional flat space - time and brane fields confined onto a four - dimensional surface . due to these couplings , logarithmic divergences that arise when evaluating the bulk field on the brane generically propagate into the brane field . in this paper , we have presented a consistent renormalization mechanism at tree and one - loop level that removes any divergences simultaneously in the brane field and bulk field when the latter is evaluated away from the brane . we have also shown that any five - point function is finite at the classical level without the addition of any further counterterm , and demonstrated that this remains true for any @xmath0-point function at any order in the loop expansion , thus proving the renormalizability of the theory . we also point out the presence of ir divergences in the loop diagrams which can be dealt with the same way as for quantum electrodynamics . the same principle can be applied to more complex theories such as electromagnetism in curved space - time , for which the same prescription remains completely valid . in particular we show that at tree - level , the coupling of electromagnetism to gravity generates a quartic term for the form field in the action , giving rise to a euler - heisenberg lagrangian which is usually only generated via quantum corrections . as another physical application , we have also explored the consequences for localized kinetic terms which are relevant in scenarios such as the dgp model . in particular we show that as soon as a kinetic term are induced on the brane , one can not prevent for the generation of an infinite series of higher order terms . this provides a natural modification of gravity on the brane which might have potential interesting signatures . to our knowledge , this prescription is the only one to date capable of making sense of sources on codimension - two branes in a regularization - independent way and providing a way to derive the low - energy effective theory on such objects in a regime where interactions with the bulk can not be ignored . since the main objective of this paper was the establishment of a consistent framework to study sources on codimension - two branes , implications for braneworld physics have only been superficially addressed . armed with these new tools , extensions to more physical scenarios will however be of great importance . understanding the relevance of our results for electromagnetism and theories with induced gravity terms were beyond the scope of this paper but will present interesting extensions . more realistic interactions from the standard model would also be intriguing , and in particular consequences to the higgs physics in six - dimensional scenarios , such as the sled , @xcite should be understood in more detail . the author wishes to thank rouzbeh allahverdi , cliff burgess , stefan hofmann , justin khoury , federico piazza , andrew tolley , mark wise and mark wyman for their contribution throughout the development of this work . research at mcmaster is supported by the natural sciences and engineering research council of canada . research at perimeter institute for theoretical physics is supported in part by the government of canada through nserc and by the province of ontario through mri . in what follows , we consider a free scalar field living on a flat six - dimensional spacetime with a conical singularity at @xmath8 . as shown in and , the brane - brane propagator of this field diverges logarithmically in the thin - brane limit : @xmath234 as @xmath235 . in order to make this quantity finite , one can try to include counterterms both in the bulk and the brane . unlike in usual eft , these counterterms are not added to make the interacting theory finite , but the classical free theory itself . we consider the following most general set of counterterms to renormalize the free theory ( renormalization of the wave function and mass both in the bulk and brane ) s=-^6x . the propagator will now be instead d^_k(r , r)&=&_n=-^+_0 j_|n|(q r)j_|n|(q r ) + & = & , where @xmath68 and @xmath236 . because of the brane counterterms @xmath237 and @xmath55 , this is however not the complete two - point function . the two - point function is obtained by summing over all the interactions with the bulk coupling . this gives rise to following dressed " propagators g_k(r , r)&=&d^_k(r , r)-d_k^(r,0)d_k^(0,r ) + g_k(r,0)&=&d^_k(r,0 ) + g_k(0,0)&=&d^_k(0,0 ) . notice that in this approach , we no longer require the propagator @xmath238 to be finite in the thin brane limit but require instead that the two - point function @xmath239 between any two points ( taken in the bulk or the conical tip ) is finite @xmath240 and @xmath55 should flow in such a way that @xmath241 and @xmath242 are all finite . this implies that : * @xmath243 should be finite in the limit @xmath244 for any value of @xmath72 , * and similarly the quantity @xmath245 $ ] should be finite for any @xmath72 and @xmath73 . it will therefore only be possible to make sense of the two - point function on the brane , if one can renormalize the wave function and the mass in such a way that the ratio @xmath243 is finite . from , we get d_k^(r,0)= k_0@xmath246 , and d_k^(0,0)= _ d_k^(^-1,0)= . it is therefore clear from these expressions that no matter how the wave function and the mass renormalization flow , the quantity @xmath247 will never be finite in the thin brane limit : = , ( ) . no local counterterm ( quadratic in the field ) will thus ever make the two - point function finite everywhere both in the bulk and the brane . in this appendix , we demonstrate that the rg flows of the brane couplings @xmath51 , @xmath92 , @xmath93 , @xmath62 , @xmath55 , @xmath94 , ( [ renormcouplings ] , [ rgflow3 ] , [ beta3_2 ] and [ beta4 ] ) is sufficient to make all @xmath0-point green s functions finite in the thin - brane limit at any order in the loop expansion , hence justifying the renormalizability of the theory . we focus , in what follows , on divergences associated with the codimension - two nature of the theory and do not discuss loop divergences which can be renormalized the standard way . to simplify , we present the argument for the @xmath0-point green s functions having only brane field external legs @xmath27 . as seen in section [ sectioninteractions ] , the generalization to an arbitrary number of bulk field legs @xmath26 is straight forward . defining the generating functional @xmath248 $ ] g[j]=0|e^-i(h^int _ + j ) |0 , the @xmath0-point green s functions are expressed by g^(n)(x_1,,x_n)=.|_j=0 . technically , we are only interested in the connected green s functions which are generated by @xmath249=-i \log g[j]$ ] . the connected @xmath0-point green s function can thus be expressed in terms of the lower ones as g_c^(n)=-i@xmath250 , where @xmath251 is the binomial coefficient . we have previously demonstrated that all the connected tree - level green s functions @xmath252 were finite for . in what follows , we show that this results remains true for any green s function @xmath253 , @xmath254 at any order in the loop expansion , thus ensuring that all the connected green s is finite for any arbitrary number of external legs . the expression for the @xmath0-point function is g^(n)(x_1,,x_n)&= & _ n0(x_1)(x_n ) + & & _ i=1^ny_i @xmath255 . omitting the evaluation points @xmath256 and @xmath257 and remembering that every field is evaluated on the brane , we have g^(n)&=&_n0 ^n@xmath258^n + & = & _ n0_m=0^n_k=0^mc^m_n c^k_m _ 3^m - k_4^n - m _ ^n - k+4n - m^k among these diagrams , some of them can connect two bulk fields together , generating a singular two - point function @xmath259 . there can be @xmath260 such connections , ( with @xmath261 ) , so that g^(n)=_n0_m=0^n_k=0^m_=0^k/2c^m_n c^k_m c^2_k _ 3^m - k_4^n - m _ 3^k ^n - k+4n - m^k-2 ^2.we now consider the number of ways there is to connect the different fields together ( we recall that for now we are interested in all the possible configurations , and do not restrict ourselves to the connected ones ) . for @xmath12 fields @xmath262 , there is@xmath263 possible configurations if @xmath12 is even , and no possible configurations if @xmath12 is odd ( @xmath264 ) . there is therefore @xmath265 ways to connect the @xmath266 bulk fields in @xmath267 . to count the number of configurations in @xmath268 , we need to pick first of all the fields @xmath27 which will connect with the remaining @xmath269 fields @xmath26 . there is @xmath270 such configurations and then @xmath271 ways to connect the remaining @xmath27 together . putting all this together , we therefore get [ g(n)1 ] g^(n)&=&_n0_m=0^n_k=0^m_=0^k/2 ( c^m_n c^k_m _ 3^m - k_4^n - m_3^k c^2_k + & & p_n-2k+4n - m+2p_2 + & & @xmath272^@xmath273^k-2@xmath259^)with p_x=\ { expressing the bulk - bulk and bulk - brane propagator as g^(0)&=&-id g^ + g^(0,0)&=&d-^2 d ^2 g^ , we get g^(n)&=&_n0_m=0^n_k=0^m_=0^k/2_=0^c^m_n c^k_m _ 4^n - m_3^m - k_3^k^k-2d^k-2 @xmath272^(n+4n - m-2 ) + & & _ = f ( ) . notice that the coefficient @xmath260 does not affect the couplings , and so the summation over @xmath260 can be performed without affecting the order of the diagram _ = 0^k/2_=0^f()=_=0^k/2 _ = ^k/2 f ( ) = _ = 0^k/2(-i)^k-2p_n - m+4n+2 . we now change the summation variables to @xmath275 , with x = m-2,y = n - m+,l = k-2so that the green s function can be expressed as g^(n)&=&_x0_y0 ( p_n+3x+4y @xmath272^(n+3x+4y ) + & & _ l=0^x_=0^y c^l_x c^_y ^l _ 3^l+2_3^x - l_4^y - d ^l+ ) , finally , summing over @xmath276 and @xmath277 , we recover the familiar expressions g^(n)=_x0_y0 p_n+3x+4y @xmath272^(n+3x+4y ) @xmath278^x @xmath279^y . so the coupling constants @xmath62 , @xmath92 , @xmath92 , @xmath94 and the free bulk - bulk propagator @xmath280 come in precisely the right combination to be finite . the rg flows of @xmath94 , @xmath92 and @xmath93 indeed ensures that both expressions @xmath281 and @xmath282 are finite , see eqs . and . since the renormalization of @xmath62 , @xmath63 and @xmath55 is such that the brane propagator @xmath272 is finite , we can conclude that @xmath253 is completely finite in the thin brane limit ( up to loop diagram divergences which can be renormalized in the standard way ) . this argument thus demonstrates that the theory is renormalizable . l. randall and r. sundrum , `` a large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension , '' phys . lett . * 83 * , 3370 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9905221 ] ; l. randall and r. sundrum , `` an alternative to compactification , '' phys . * 83 * , 4690 ( 1999 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9906064 ] . a. salam and e. sezgin , `` chiral compactification on minkowski x s**2 of n=2 einstein - maxwell supergravity in six - dimensions , '' phys . b * 147 * , 47 ( 1984 ) . p. kanti , r. madden and k. a. olive , `` a 6-d brane world model , '' phys . d * 64 * , 044021 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0104177 ] ; g. w. gibbons , r. guven and c. n. pope , `` 3-branes and uniqueness of the salam - sezgin vacuum , '' phys . b * 595 * , 498 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0307238 ] ; y. aghababaie _ et al . _ , `` warped brane worlds in six dimensional supergravity , '' jhep * 0309 * , 037 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0308064 ] ; h. m. lee and a. papazoglou , `` brane solutions of a spherical sigma model in six dimensions , '' nucl . phys . b * 705 * , 152 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0407208 ] ; c. p. burgess , f. quevedo , g. tasinato and i. zavala , `` general axisymmetric solutions and self - tuning in 6d chiral gauged supergravity , '' jhep * 0411 * , 069 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0408109 ] ; s. mukohyama , y. sendouda , h. yoshiguchi and s. kinoshita , `` warped flux compactification and brane gravity , '' jcap * 0507 * , 013 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0506050 ] ; s. l. parameswaran , g. tasinato and i. zavala , `` the 6d superswirl , '' nucl . b * 737 * , 49 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0509061 ] ; h. m. lee and c. ludeling , `` the general warped solution with conical branes in six - dimensional supergravity , '' jhep * 0601 * , 062 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0510026 ] ; a. j. tolley , c. p. burgess , d. hoover and y. aghababaie , bulk singularities and the effective cosmological constant for higher jhep * 0603 * , 091 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0512218 ] ; a. j. tolley , c. p. burgess , c. de rham and d. hoover , `` scaling solutions to 6d gauged chiral supergravity , '' new j. phys . * 8 * , 324 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0608083 ] ; t. kobayashi and m. minamitsuji , `` brane cosmological solutions in six - dimensional warped flux compactifications , '' arxiv:0705.3500 [ hep - th ] ; e. j. copeland and o. seto , `` dynamical solutions of warped six dimensional supergravity , '' arxiv:0705.4169 [ hep - th ] . s. hayakawa , d. ida , t. shiromizu and t. tanaka , `` gravitation in the codimension two brane world , '' prog . theor . phys . suppl . * 148 * , 128 ( 2003 ) ; j. m. cline , j. descheneau , m. giovannini and j. vinet , `` cosmology of codimension - two braneworlds , '' jhep * 0306 * , 048 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0304147 ] ; j. vinet , `` generalised cosmology of codimension - two braneworlds , '' int . j. mod . a * 19 * , 5295 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0408082 ] ; c. charmousis and r. zegers , `` einstein gravity on an even codimension brane , '' phys . d * 72 * , 064005 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0502171 ] ; e. papantonopoulos and a. papazoglou , `` cosmological evolution of a purely conical codimension-2 brane world , '' jhep * 0509 * , 012 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0507278 ] . m. l. graesser , j. e. kile and p. wang , `` gravitational perturbations of a six dimensional self - tuning model , '' phys . d * 70 * , 024008 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0403074 ] ; h. m. lee and a. papazoglou , `` scalar mode analysis of the warped salam - sezgin model , '' nucl . b * 747 * , 294 ( 2006 ) [ erratum - ibid . b * 765 * , 200 ( 2007 ) ] [ arxiv : hep - th/0602208 ] ; c. p. burgess , c. de rham , d. hoover , d. mason and a. j. tolley , `` kicking the rugby ball : perturbations of 6d gauged chiral supergravity , '' jcap * 0702 * , 009 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0610078 ] ; s. l. parameswaran , s. randjbar - daemi and a. salvio , `` stability and negative tensions in 6d brane worlds , '' arxiv:0706.1893 [ hep - th ] . m. peloso , l. sorbo and g. tasinato , `` standard 4d gravity on a brane in six dimensional flux compactifications , '' phys . d * 73 * , 104025 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0603026 ] . n. arkani - hamed , s. dimopoulos and g. r. dvali , `` the hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter , '' phys . b * 429 * , 263 ( 1998 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9803315 ] . a. albrecht , c. p. burgess , f. ravndal and c. skordis , `` natural quintessence and large extra dimensions , '' phys . d * 65 * , 123507 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0107573 ] ; d. m. ghilencea , d. hoover , c. p. burgess and f. quevedo , `` casimir energies for 6d supergravities compactified on t(2)/z(n ) with wilson lines , '' jhep * 0509 * , 050 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0506164 ] ; e. elizalde , m. minamitsuji and w. naylor , `` casimir effect in rugby - ball type flux compactifications , '' phys . rev . d * 75 * , 064032 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0702098 ] ; m. minamitsuji , `` casimir effect in a 6d warped flux compactification model , '' arxiv:0704.3623 [ gr - qc ] ; k. koyama , `` the cosmological constant and dark energy in braneworlds , '' arxiv:0706.1557 [ astro - ph ] . v. a. rubakov and m. e. shaposhnikov , `` extra space - time dimensions : towards a solution to the cosmological constant problem , '' phys . lett . b * 125 * , 139 ( 1983 ) . y. aghababaie , c. p. burgess , s. l. parameswaran and f. quevedo , `` towards a naturally small cosmological constant from branes in 6d supergravity , '' nucl . b * 680 * , 389 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0304256 ] ; o. corradini , a. iglesias and z. kakushadze , `` toward solving the cosmological constant problem ? , '' int . j. mod . a * 18 * , 3221 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0212101 ] ; s. m. carroll and m. m. guica , `` sidestepping the cosmological constant with football - shaped extra dimensions , '' arxiv : hep - th/0302067 ; i. navarro , `` codimension two compactifications and the cosmological constant problem , '' jcap * 0309 * , 004 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0302129 ] ; i. navarro , `` spheres , deficit angles and the cosmological constant , '' class . quant . grav . * 20 * , 3603 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0305014 ] ; h. p. nilles , a. papazoglou and g. tasinato , `` selftuning and its footprints , '' nucl . b * 677 * , 405 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0309042 ] ; c. p. burgess , `` supersymmetric large extra dimensions and the cosmological constant : an update , '' annals phys . * 313 * , 283 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0402200 ] ; j. m. schwindt and c. wetterich , `` the cosmological constant problem in codimension - two brane models , '' phys . b * 628 * , 189 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0508065 ] ; c. p. burgess , `` supersymmetric large extra dimensions and the cosmological constant problem , '' arxiv : hep - th/0510123 ; e. k. park and p. s. kwon , `` a self - tuning mechanism in 6d gravity - scalar theory , '' arxiv : hep - th/0702171 . c. p. burgess , j. matias and f. quevedo , `` msled : a minimal supersymmetric large extra dimensions scenario , '' nucl . b * 706 * , 71 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0404135 ] ; j. vinet and j. m. cline , `` can codimension - two branes solve the cosmological constant problem ? , '' phys . d * 70 * , 083514 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0406141 ] ; j. garriga and m. porrati , `` football shaped extra dimensions and the absence of self - tuning , '' jhep * 0408 * , 028 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0406158 ] ; j. vinet and j. m. cline , `` codimension - two branes in six - dimensional supergravity and the cosmological constant problem , '' phys . d * 71 * , 064011 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0501098 ] . g. dvali , g. gabadadze and m. shifman , `` diluting cosmological constant in infinite volume extra dimensions , '' phys . d * 67 * , 044020 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0202174 ] ; o. corradini , a. iglesias and z. kakushadze , `` diluting solutions of the cosmological constant problem , '' mod . a * 18 * , 1343 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0305164 ] . g. dvali , s. hofmann and j. khoury , arxiv : hep - th/0703027 . g. r. dvali , g. gabadadze and m. porrati , `` metastable gravitons and infinite volume extra dimensions , '' phys . b * 484 * , 112 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0002190 ] ; g. r. dvali , g. gabadadze and m. porrati , `` 4d gravity on a brane in 5d minkowski space , '' phys . b * 485 * , 208 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0005016 ] ; g. r. dvali and g. gabadadze , `` gravity on a brane in infinite - volume extra space , '' phys . d * 63 * , 065007 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0008054 ] . w. d. goldberger and m. b. wise , `` renormalization group flows for brane couplings , '' phys . d * 65 * , 025011 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0104170 ] . w. d. goldberger and i. z. rothstein , `` an effective field theory of gravity for extended objects , '' phys . d * 73 * , 104029 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0409156 ] ; w. d. goldberger and i. z. rothstein , `` dissipative effects in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics , '' phys . d * 73 * , 104030 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0511133 ] ; w. d. goldberger and i. z. rothstein , `` towers of gravitational theories , '' gen . grav . * 38 * , 1537 ( 2006 ) [ int . j. mod . d * 15 * , 2293 ( 2006 ) ] [ arxiv : hep - th/0605238 ] ; w. d. goldberger , `` les houches lectures on effective field theories and gravitational radiation , '' arxiv : hep - ph/0701129 . r. a. porto , `` post - newtonian corrections to the motion of spinning bodies in nrgr , '' phys . d * 73 * , 104031 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : gr - qc/0511061 ] ; r. a. porto and i. z. rothstein , `` the hyperfine einstein - infeld - hoffmann potential , '' phys . lett . * 97 * , 021101 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : gr - qc/0604099 ] ; r. a. porto and r. sturani , `` scalar gravity : post - newtonian corrections via an effective field theory approach , '' arxiv : gr - qc/0701105 ; r. a. porto , `` new results at 3pn via an effective field theory of gravity , '' arxiv : gr - qc/0701106 . f. del aguila , m. perez - victoria and j. santiago , `` bulk fields with general brane kinetic terms , '' jhep * 0302 * , 051 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0302023 ] ; f. del aguila , m. perez - victoria and j. santiago , `` effective description of brane terms in extra dimensions , '' jhep * 0610 * , 056 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0601222 ] . t. gherghetta and m. e. shaposhnikov , `` localizing gravity on a string - like defect in six dimensions , '' phys . rev . lett . * 85 * , 240 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0004014 ] . i. navarro and j. santiago , `` gravity on codimension 2 brane worlds , '' jhep * 0502 * , 007 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0411250 ] ; c. de rham and a. j. tolley , jcap * 0602 * , 003 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0511138 ] . t. kobayashi and m. minamitsuji , `` gravity on an extended brane in six - dimensional warped flux compactifications , '' phys . d * 75 * , 104013 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0703029 ] ; c. p. burgess , d. hoover and g. tasinato , `` uv caps and modulus stabilization for 6d gauged chiral supergravity , '' arxiv:0705.3212 [ hep - th ] . a. e. nelson , `` a new angle on intersecting branes in infinite extra dimensions , '' phys . d * 63 * , 087503 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/9909001 ] ; e. gravanis and s. willison , `` intersecting hyper - surfaces in dimensionally continued topological density gravitation , '' j. math . * 45 * , 4223 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0306220 ] ; i. navarro and j. santiago , `` higher codimension braneworlds from intersecting branes , '' jhep * 0404 * , 062 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0402204 ] ; n. kaloper , `` origami world , '' jhep * 0405 * , 061 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0403208 ] . c. de rham , g. dvali , s. hofmann , j. khoury , o. pujolas , m. redi and a. j. tolley , `` cascading dgp , '' arxiv:0711.2072 [ hep - th ] ; c. de rham , s. hofmann , j. khoury and a. j. tolley , `` cascading gravity and degravitation , '' arxiv:0712.2821 [ hep - th ] . c. de rham , t. shiromizu and a. j. tolley , `` weaker gravity at submillimetre scales in braneworlds models , '' arxiv : gr - qc/0604071 . c. deffayet , g. r. dvali and g. gabadadze , `` accelerated universe from gravity leaking to extra dimensions , '' phys . d * 65 * , 044023 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0105068 ] . c. de rham and a. j. tolley , `` mimicking lambda with a spin - two ghost condensate , '' jcap * 0607 * , 004 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0605122 ] ; g. gabadadze , `` a model for cosmic self - acceleration , '' arxiv : hep - th/0612213 . h. beauchemin , g. azuelos and c. p. burgess , `` dimensionless coupling of bulk scalars at the lhc , '' j. phys . g * 30 * , n17 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0407196 ] ; j. j. van der bij and s. dilcher , `` a higher dimensional explanation of the excess of higgs - like events at cern lep , '' phys . b * 638 * , 234 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0605008 ] . Abstract:
[ "distributional sources of matter on codimension - two and higher branes are only well - defined as regularized objects . nevertheless , intuition from effective field theory suggests that the low - energy physics on such branes should be independent of any high - energy regularization scheme . in this paper , we address this issue in the context of a scalar field model where matter fields ( the standard model ) living on such a brane interact with bulk fields ( gravity ) . the low - energy effective theory is shown to be consistent and independent of the regularization scheme , provided the brane couplings are renormalized appropriately at the classical level . we perform explicit computations of the classical renormalization group flows at tree and one - loop level , demonstrate that the theory is renormalizable against codimension - two divergences , and extend the analysis to several physical applications such as electrodynamics and brane localized kinetic terms ." ]
14,707
14,707
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: gravitational wave ( gw ) observations are expected to provide a new view of relativistic phenomena in the universe . one of the most promising candidates for the direct detection of gws is the merger of compact binaries such as binary neutron stars ( nss ) . the second generation of ground - based gw detectors , such as advanced ligo @xcite , advanced virgo @xcite and kagra @xcite , will reach the sensitivity required to detect gws from the inspiral and coalescence of compact binary systems including binary nss within a few hundred mpc . statistical studies suggest that a few tens of merger events should be observed per year @xcite . electromagnetic counterparts of gw emitters have been recently focused on to maximize a scientific return from the expected detection of gws ( e.g. , * ? ? ? follow - up observations of these electromagnetic counterparts are important to confirm a gw detection and to investigate progenitors and environments . the electromagnetic detection also improves the localization of gw sources because the localization accuracy by photons is much better than that by the ground - based gw detectors @xmath1 deg@xmath2 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? sophisticated simulations have revealed mass ejection associated with the mergers of binary nss by several mechanisms . significant mass is dynamically ejected by gravitational torques and hydrodynamical interactions during the mergers , called dynamical ejecta ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? general relativistic simulations show that these ejecta distribute nearly isotropic compared to newtonian simulations in the cases of binary nss @xcite , while they are anisotropic for ns - black hole ( bh ) mergers @xcite . mass may be also ejected through winds driven by neutrinos @xcite , magnetic fields of and/or amplified by the merged objects @xcite , viscous heating and nuclear recombination @xcite . a traditional electromagnetic counterpart is short - hard gamma - ray bursts ( grbs ; * ? ? ? recent simulations have revealed that a hypermassive ns is formed from the merger of a ns binary ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , which is believed to collapse into a bh at later time . non - collapsed matter and some ejecta falling back to the bh form a torus around the bh ( e.g. , * ? ? ? then , a relativistic jet may be launched from the bh - torus system , which is believed to be the central engine of short - hard grbs . another interesting possibility is a so - called macronova / kilonova , which is thermal emission from ejecta ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the radiative energy of a macronova is estimated between that of a classical nova and supernova . ejecta can also produce non - thermal emission at later time similarly to supernova remnants @xcite . ejecta may accompany an advanced relativistic part , producing early emission ( @xmath3 hours ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? emission from macronovae and ns binary merger remnants is almost isotropic and hence different from that of short grbs which depends on the directions of their relativistic jets . moreover , macronovae are closer in time to mergers than emission from merger remnants and do not depend on the properties of circumburst environments . therefore , macronovae are expected to play a crucial role to localize a large sample of gw events @xcite . recently , a macronova candidate following grb 130603b was discovered @xcite . this candidate is widely interpreted as the results of the radioactive decay of @xmath0-process elements produced in the ejecta of a compact binary merger @xcite . we call this scenario _ an @xmath0-process model _ throughout this paper . the ejecta from a merger of binary nss is primarily neutron - rich . then , heavy radioactive elements ( mass number @xmath4 ) are expected to form through neutron - capture onto nuclei ( @xmath0-process nucleosynthesis ) ( e.g. , * ? ? ? although the @xmath0-process nucleosynthesis ends a few hundred millisecond after a merger , synthesized elements release energy due to nuclear fission and beta decays up to @xmath5 days ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) . a schematic picture for this model is shown in the left panel of figure [ figure : model ] . if this scenario is correct , the observations also give important insights into the enrichment of @xmath0-process elements in the galaxy evolution ( e.g. , * ? ? ? although the @xmath0-process model explains the observed light curve of the macronova , it is based on the limited observational data and the nuclear heating rate with large uncertainties . required mass of dynamical ejecta to explain the observations is relatively large compared with the simulation results @xcite . in addition , the occurrence of @xmath0-process nucleosynthesis needs the ejecta with low electron fraction ( @xmath6 ) . however , relatively high electron fraction ( @xmath7 ) can be also realized , which has been discussed for neutrino - driven wind ( e.g. , * ? ? ? it is worth considering other possibilities such as the scenarios of an external shock between ejecta and surrounding medium @xcite , a supramassive magnetar @xcite and dust grains @xcite . in this study , we consider another power source of macronovae , i.e. , energy injection from the activity of the central engine , in addition to the radioactive decay of @xmath0-process elements . this is similar to the early evolution of core - collapse supernovae ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? we call this model _ an engine model _ throughout this paper . there are several motivations to consider that the activity of the central engine contributes to the heating of ejecta . one observational motivation is the extended emission following the prompt emission of short grbs . the origin of extended emission is considered to be the activity of the central engine @xcite because the sharp drop of its light curve is difficult to be reproduced by afterglow emission @xcite . after the merger , a stable ns or a bh is formed . in the case that a bh with a torus ( or disk ) is formed , the energy injection to the ejecta is expected as a form of the jet and/or disk wind ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) . in the case that a ns with strong poloidal magnetic field is formed as a result of a merger , the wind of relativistic particles is ejected @xcite . then , the wind collides with the ejecta , and about half of the wind energy converts to the internal energy by the shock - heating . a schematic picture is shown in the right - hand side of figure [ figure : model ] . the ejecta emission powered by a stable magnetar has already been discussed @xcite . they suggest that the magnetar - powered ejecta emit the brighter optical and x - ray emissions than that of the @xmath0-process model . however , they did not show that the magnetar - powered ejecta explain the detected infrared excess in grb 130603b @xcite . the engine model can provide energy enough to reproduce the detected macronova candidate , grb 130603b . we do not specify the specific heating sources . alternatively , to estimate the luminosity and temperature , we assume that the internal energy @xmath8 erg is injected to the ejecta at the time @xmath9 s after the merger . these values are consistent with typical isotropic energy @xmath10 erg and duration @xmath11 s of the extended emission @xcite . using the velocity of the ejecta @xmath12 , the temperature at @xmath13 is @xmath14^{1/4}$ ] , where @xmath15 is the radiative constant . if we only consider the adiabatic cooling for the cooling process of the ejecta , the evolution of the internal energy @xmath16 and temperature @xmath17 is scaled as @xmath18 and @xmath19 . the luminosity is described as @xmath20 . adopting the ejecta velocity @xmath21 cm s@xmath22 @xcite , the luminosity @xmath23 and the temperature @xmath17 at @xmath24s are @xmath25 and @xmath26 the observations of macronova of grb 130603b give j - band luminosity @xmath27 erg s@xmath22 and the difference between j - band and b - band @xmath28 mag which corresponds to the temperature @xmath29 k at @xmath30 days after grb 130603b in the source rest frame @xcite . therefore , in this estimate , the luminosity and temperature for the engine model is consistent with the observation of the macronova following grb130603b . we model the evolution of luminosity and temperature of a macronova . unlike the previous studies , we treat the model in an analytical manner and formulate a light curve including the early phase ( @xmath31 s ) , which is important for the search of electromagnetic counterparts of gw emitters . we consider shock - heating due to the activity of a central engine as a heating mechanism of the ejecta . for comparison , the @xmath0-process model , which has been discussed in most papers ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , is also formulated . then , we compare the results of our models with observations to constrain the model parameters such as the ejected mass and the velocity of the ejecta . although our models are simplified , it is valuable to make comparison between two heating models . in section [ model ] , we introduce our model assumptions . we describe the analytical models for the evolution of luminosity and temperature in section [ evolution ] . then , we compare our results with observations in section [ discuss ] . implications for the discrimination between two models are also discussed . we summarize our results in section [ summary ] . in appendix a , we summarize the formulae for the observed temperature and bolometric luminosity . significant mass of material @xmath32 is ejected during a binary merger . we model ejecta by following the results of the general relativistic simulations of ns - ns mergers in @xcite . the simulations show that ejecta expand in a nearly homologous manner ( see also * ? ? ? the morphology of the ejecta is quasi - spherical in the case of a merger of binary nss . according to these results , we assume an isotropic and homologous expansion for the ejecta . then , the velocity of ejecta @xmath12 is @xmath33 where the radius @xmath0 originates the central engine and the time @xmath34 is measured from the time when a compact binary merges . note that in the case of a merger of ns - bh binary , the ejected mass expands with significant anisotropy @xcite . we do not consider such anisotropic ejecta in this work . @xcite found that the profile of ejecta obtained from simulations by @xcite can be well fitted by a power - law function @xmath35 . the power - law index of snapshot density @xmath36 is more or less independent on the dynamics of mergers , which is in the range of @xmath374 for @xmath38 , where @xmath39 and @xmath40 are the velocities of the outer and inner edges of the ejecta , respectively . we choose the middle of this range @xmath41 in this study . we also fix the maximum velocity @xmath42 from simulation results @xcite . the maximum velocity @xmath39 is comparable with the escape velocity of the system . the minimum velocity @xmath43 is mainly determined by complicated dynamics at the initial stage of the merger @xmath44 . for the mass density profile at the front of the ejecta , we assume the discrete boundary and the mass density @xmath45 at the region @xmath46 . although this profile may be far from the actual one , ) . such a profile is difficult to calculate precisely with current numerical calculations . ] our main aim is to compare two models for energy sources , so that our conclusions are not affected . in section [ outer ] , we discuss the dependence on the mass density profile at the outer region of the ejecta for the observed light curve . here , we only consider the evolution after the initial stage of the merger ( @xmath47 ) and treat @xmath43 as a model parameter . because of homologous expansion , the density decreases as @xmath48 . then , the density profile is described by @xmath49 where @xmath50 and @xmath51 are normalization factors . the factor @xmath52 is related to the total mass of the ejecta @xmath53 as following , @xmath54,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we use @xmath55 from equation ( [ sec2:v ] ) . we also introduce the radius of ejecta outer edge @xmath56 and their inner edge @xmath57 the inner part of the ejecta is optically thick , and therefore the propagation of radiation in the ejecta can be regarded as a diffusion process . photons can diffusively escape from the region which satisfies that the diffusion time , @xmath58 , is smaller than the dynamical time @xmath34 , @xmath59 the medium in this region is called to be effectively thin @xcite . for convenience , we introduce a diffusion radius @xmath60 which is the radius satisfying the condition @xmath61 . furthermore , we divide ejecta into two regions called the effectively thin ( @xmath62 ) and effectively thick ( @xmath63 ) regions . near the diffusion radius , the optical depth is @xmath64 . we consider random walk for photons so that the mean number of scatterings to propagate for the distance @xmath65 is @xmath66 , where @xmath67 is the mean free path for a photon . hence , the diffusion time @xmath58 for the propagation distance @xmath65 is @xmath68 in the right hand of equation ( [ sec2 - 1:t_diff ] ) , we use @xmath69 . we calculate the diffusion radius @xmath70 from the condition @xmath71 . since the mass density profile of the ejecta is described by a decreasing power - law function ( equation [ sec2 - 1:rho ] ) , the diffusion time @xmath58 is negligible in an outer part . thus , in order to calculate the diffusion radius @xmath70 , it is a good approximation to only consider scatterings near @xmath70 ( @xmath72 ) . however , in the early phase , the distance from the outer edge of the ejecta @xmath73 to the diffusion radius @xmath70 is smaller than the diffusion radius @xmath74 . therefore , we should take the propagation distance as @xmath75 we call the first the thin - diffusion phase and the second the thick - diffusion phase throughout this paper . we schematically show these two phases in figure [ figure : diffuse ] . note that in the thin - diffusion phase , since the size of the effectively thin region is much smaller than the size of the ejecta ( @xmath76 ) , the calculation of the radiative transfer using monte carlo technique ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) requires a large number of realizations to follow the temporal evolution , which do not seem to have been considered properly so far . to obtain the diffusion radius , we need to calculate the optical depth @xmath77 of photons which propagate a distance @xmath65 . using equations ( [ sec2 - 1:rho ] ) and ( [ sec2 - 1:deltar ] ) , the optical depth @xmath77 is described as , @xmath78^{-1 } \nonumber \\ & & \times { \displaystyle \left[\left(\frac{r_{\rm diff}}{v_{\min}t}\right)^{1-\beta}-\left(\frac{v_{\max}}{v_{\min}}\right)^{1-\beta}\right]},\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the thin - diffusion phase , and @xmath79^{-1 } \nonumber \\ & & \times { \displaystyle \left(\frac{r_{\rm diff}}{v_{\min}t}\right)^{1-\beta}(1 - 2^{1-\beta})},\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the thick - diffusion phase , where @xmath80 is the opacity of the ejecta . for simplicity , we use a grey approximation and a spatially uniform value of the opacity @xmath80 . from the results of @xcite ( see also * ? ? ? * ) which consider the contribution from all @xmath0-process elements to the opacity of merger ejecta , the evolution of the bolometric luminosity can be approximately described by the constant value of the opacity , @xmath81 cm@xmath2g@xmath22 . following their results , we use this value for the opacity of the ejecta . note that the exact value of the opacity of the ejecta has some uncertainties in the production efficiency of @xmath0-process elements and its spatial distribution . moreover , if the ejecta temperature is low enough for dust formation ( @xmath83 k ) , the opacity significantly increases @xcite . from these reasons , we consider the dependence on @xmath80 in section [ evolution ] . our model is based on the formulation of the light curves of supernovae ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , but there are several differences . in the case of type ii supernovae , the opacity is significantly reduced due to hydrogen recombination ( e.g. , * ? ? ? however , since the ionization potentials of the lanthanides included in the @xmath0-process elements are generally lower than that of hydrogen and the iron group , the opacity remains high at relatively low temperature @xcite . therefore , we do not consider the recombination effects for the opacity . as far as we know , the supernova studies ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) have not taken into account the thin - diffusion phase , which is necessary for treating the thickness of the diffusion length appropriately and estimating the physical quantities by the values at the outer edge of the ejecta in the analytical formulae . this phase may be also important for the case of supernovae . some supernova studies consider the planar phase @xcite in which the evolution of the ejecta is approximately planar as long as its radius do not double . in the case of the ns - ns merger , since the initial length scale of the merger system is small @xmath84 cm and the velocity of the merger ejecta is subrelativistic , the planar phase is irrelevant for the observations . one of the two heating mechanisms we consider is nuclear heating by @xmath0-process elements . since the beta decay products of @xmath0-process elements produced in ns binary mergers naturally heat ejecta , this mechanism is considered to power the emission of a macronova ( e.g. , * ? ? ? the nuclear heating rate is calculated in several works @xcite . the derived heating rates per unit mass @xmath85 are described by the following formula @xmath86 in this study , we use @xmath87 and @xmath88 obtained by @xcite . the value of @xmath89 has been obtained by simulations under some simplified assumptions with only limited parameter regions . thus , we should note that the value of @xmath90 has uncertainties . the injected internal energy by the nuclear decay is @xmath91 in the region @xmath63 . on the other hand , the injected energy in this region is decreased by adiabatic cooling . the time - evolution of internal energy due to the adiabatic cooling is proportional to @xmath92 . comparing the two temporal evolution , the index of the adiabatic cooling is smaller than that of the increase of internal energy due to the nuclear decay for @xmath93 . since we use @xmath87 , we neglect the injected internal energy in the region @xmath63 . unlike the @xmath0-process model , energy injection occurs only within the time @xmath13 in the engine model . we only consider adiabatic cooling as a cooling process of ejecta after @xmath13 , and therefore , the temperature distribution at time @xmath34 is , @xmath94 where the index @xmath95 is a parameter for a snapshot distribution and @xmath96 is a normalization factor described later . the time dependence of @xmath92 is the effect of adiabatic expansion . the normalized value @xmath96 is determined by using the relation of total injected internal energy @xmath97 as @xmath98,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we use @xmath99 . for the temperature index @xmath100 , the innermost region of ejecta has dominant internal energy . as will be shown in section [ evolution ] , since the luminosity and temperature always depend on the product of @xmath97 and @xmath13 , we treat @xmath101 as a parameter . thus , the engine model has two parameters , @xmath95 and @xmath101 instead of @xmath90 and @xmath102 in the @xmath0-process model . energy injection is not always a single event and the shock does not always get through the whole ejecta . it is considered that the activity of the central engine accompanies violent time variability . in this case , multiple shocks propagate into the ejecta . some of the shock may not catch up with the outer edge of the ejecta . current general relativistic simulations can not calculate the evolution of ejecta for such a long time after merger ( @xmath103 s ) , so that the index @xmath95 of temperature distribution is highly uncertain . therefore , we treat the temperature index @xmath95 as a parameter . unlike the case of core - collapse supernova @xcite , it is difficult to determine the temperature distribution of heated ejecta by the activity of a central engine . in the case that the activity of a central engine injects the energy into the ejecta , the radiation - dominated shock ( where the internal energy behind the shock is dominated by radiation ) is formed in the ejecta . the ejecta are heated during the propagation of the shock . this situation is similar to the initial phase of core - collapse supernovae ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? in the cases of core - collapse supernovae , the kinetic energy of ejecta before the shock heating is much smaller than the injected internal energy . in such ejecta , the relation between velocity and mass density was obtained by @xcite ( in the non - relativistic case for the velocity of the ejecta ) . using sakurai s ( 1960 ) solution and the equipartition between the kinetic energy after the shock heating and the internal energy @xcite , the distribution of the temperature distribution is derived . however , in the case of compact binary mergers , the merger ejecta have a large velocity ( @xmath104 ) before the shock heating @xcite . then , injected internal energy is not always larger than the kinetic energy of ejecta so that it is not clear whether we can use the equipartition to estimate the distribution of internal energy or not . the kinetic energy of the ejecta @xmath105 is described as @xmath106}{(5-\beta)\left[1-\left(\frac{v_{\max}}{v_{\min}}\right)^{3-\beta}\right]}}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that if the injected internal energy @xmath97 is larger than the kinetic energy of the ejecta , it is expected that some of the internal energy converts to the kinetic energy of the ejecta . as a result , the internal energy and the kinetic energy are equal as in the case of core - collapse supernovae . then , the mass density distribution and the maximum velocity of the ejecta derived from simulations may be changed because the injection time may be long @xmath107s compared to that calculated by simulations @xmath108s @xcite . for simplicity , we only consider the case @xmath109 . clccc + symbol & & fiducial model & minimum mass model & hot interior model + @xmath53 & ejecta mass & @xmath110 & @xmath111 & @xmath112 + @xmath43 & minimum velocity & @xmath113 & @xmath114 & @xmath115 + @xmath39 & maximum velocity & @xmath116 & @xmath116 & @xmath116 + @xmath36 & index of the density profile & 3.5 & 3.5 & 3.5 + @xmath80 & opacity & 10 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 & 30 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 & 10 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 + @xmath90 & nuclear heating rate at 1 day & @xmath117 erg s@xmath22 g@xmath22 & @xmath118 & @xmath117 erg s@xmath22 g@xmath22 + @xmath102 & index of nuclear heating rate & 1.3 & @xmath118 & 1.3 + @xmath97 & internal energy at @xmath13 & @xmath119 erg & @xmath120 erg & @xmath121 erg + @xmath13 & injection time & @xmath122 s & @xmath122 s & @xmath122 s + @xmath95 & index of the temperature profile & 1.6 & 1.1 & 2.7 + [ tab : parameter ] in this section , we present the evolution of the observed temperature and luminosity of a macronova using our model introduced in the previous section . in sections [ thin ] [ transparent ] , we focus on the parameter dependence of the evolution using some approximations . in section [ fiducial ] , we calculate the temperature and luminosity using the fiducial model with parameters summarized in the first column of table 1 . to calculate the luminosity and temperature , we assume that the emission is well described by the blackbody radiation ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) . for simplicity , we assume that the observed temperature equals to the temperature at the diffusion radius @xmath70 . we also assume that the temperature is not so different from the diffusion radius @xmath70 to @xmath123 so that in the thick - diffusion phase ( @xmath124 ) , we only consider the emission from @xmath70 to @xmath123 to calculate the observed luminosity for both the @xmath0-process and engine models . in some studies ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , the observed temperature is approximated by the temperature at the radius of the photosphere @xmath125 where the optical depth is unity . since the velocity of the ejecta is near the light speed , the optical depths at the diffusion radius @xmath70 and its twice @xmath123 are @xmath126 . therefore , our assumed temperature approximately equals to the temperature at the photosphere . in section [ diffusion ] , we introduced two phases , the thin- and thick - diffusion phases ( figure [ figure : diffuse ] ) , depending on the size of the region where photons make the diffusion in the ejecta @xmath65 . we also introduce another phase @xmath127 , the transparent phase , in which photons can diffuse out from the entire of the ejecta . thus , we divide the evolution into these three phases for the values of the diffusion radius @xmath70 as described below . the size of the effectively thin region gets larger with time . at the early phase of a macronova , the diffusion radius @xmath70 , which is the inner radius of the effectively thin region , is near the outer edge of the ejecta @xmath73 . in this early phase , we take the propagation distance @xmath65 of a photon as @xmath128 . since we assume that the density is a homologous function of the velocity @xmath35 , the density can be approximated as @xmath129 in the region @xmath130 . using the escaping condition for the diffusing photons @xmath131 , equation ( [ sec2 - 1:t_diff ] ) and approximation on the optical depth @xmath132 , the propagation distance @xmath65 can be estimated as @xmath133 in the discussion of parameter dependence ( sections [ thin ] [ transparent ] ) , we only consider the dominant term . for example , we neglect the second term in the right - hand side of equation ( [ sec2 - 1:m_ej ] ) to derive the parameter equation ( [ sec2 - 2 - 1:deltar ] ) because the index of the mass density is @xmath134 in our model . in section [ fiducial ] , we include the subdominant terms to calculate the light curves numerically . first we consider the @xmath0-process model . the evolution of temperature @xmath135 is obtained by the internal energy density @xmath136 at the radius @xmath137 . using equations ( [ sec2 - 1:rho ] ) and ( [ sec2 - 1:m_ej ] ) , the parameter dependence of the density is @xmath138 . the observed temperature is @xmath139 for @xmath87 , the observed temperature evolves as @xmath140 . this is because in the thin - diffusion phase the ejecta is effectively a single expanding shell with @xmath141 and the injected energy @xmath142 is almost constant so that the observed temperature approximately follow adiabatic cooling @xmath19 . note that in this phase the observed temperature does not depend on the opacity . the bolometric luminosity @xmath143 for the radioactivity is described as the product of the mass within the thickness @xmath65 in equation ( [ sec2 - 2 - 1:deltar ] ) and the nuclear heating rate @xmath89 in equation ( [ sec2 - 1:dotepsilon ] ) so that @xmath144 for @xmath87 , the evolution of the bolometric luminosity is @xmath145 . next we consider the engine model . we should take into account the freedom of the temperature index @xmath95 in the temperature distribution ( equation [ sec2 - 1:t ] ) . since we only consider a dominant term in the right - hand side of equation ( [ sec2 - 1:e_int ] ) ( the first term for @xmath146 or the second term for @xmath147 ) in this subsection , the parameter dependence of the temperature @xmath96 is described as @xmath148 substituting @xmath149 into equation ( [ sec2 - 1:t ] ) , the observed temperature is described as @xmath150 since the observed temperature @xmath135 approximately equals to the temperature at the outer edge of the ejecta , @xmath151 , the evolution of the observed temperature and the luminosity are also determined by the adiabatic cooling . the bolometric luminosity in the effectively thin region is equal to the total radiation created by thermal emission in this region @xcite . using equation ( [ sec2 - 2 - 1:t_obs , sh ] ) , the bolometric luminosity is described as @xmath152 the time evolution of bolometric luminosity for the engine model does not depend on the temperature index @xmath95 in the thin - diffusion phase . comparing the engine model with the @xmath0-process model in the thin - diffusion phase , the bolometric luminosity and the observed temperature decrease faster in the engine model than those in the @xmath0-process model . these time - dependence do not depend on the indices of the density and temperature . note that the light curve may depend on the detailed profile of the front of the ejecta in this thin - diffusion phase . the profile of the ejecta front is difficult to calculate by the numerical simulation due to its low density , and hence has large uncertain @xcite . we discuss its dependence in section [ discuss ] . we consider diffusion to evaluate the diffusion radius in the thick - diffusion phase . we take the propagation distance @xmath72 after the time when the difference between the radius of the outer edge of the ejecta @xmath73 and the diffusion radius @xmath70 is larger than the diffusion radius , @xmath153 , since the optical depth of the outer part is negligible for the density profile in equation ( [ sec2 - 1:rho ] ) . in this thick - diffusion phase , mass density significantly deviates from @xmath154 . substituting equations ( [ sec2 - 1:t_diff ] ) and ( [ sec2 - 1:tau2 ] ) into @xmath61 , the diffusion radius @xmath70 is calculated as @xmath155^{\frac{1}{\beta-2 } } \nonumber \\ & \propto&\kappa^{\frac{1}{\beta-2}}m_{\rm ej}^{\frac{1}{\beta-2}}v_{\min}^{\frac{\beta-3}{\beta-2}}t^{\frac{\beta-4}{\beta-2}},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we use the relations @xmath72 and @xmath156 . the latter is obtained from the assumption of the homologous expansion . regarding the optical depth @xmath77 , the second term is neglected in the right - hand side of equation ( [ sec2 - 1:tau ] ) to focus only on the dominant term to study parameter dependence in sections [ thin ] [ transparent ] . for @xmath41 , the diffusion radius decreases with time ( @xmath157 ) . then , emission from the region with relatively high mass density can be observed progressively in this phase ( @xmath158 ) . we introduce the transition time @xmath159 between thin- and thick - diffusion phases , which satisfies the relation @xmath160 . substituting equation ( [ sec2 - 2 - 2:r_diff ] ) and @xmath161 into the relation @xmath160 , we can obtain the transition time @xmath159 as @xmath162 where @xmath163 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 , @xmath164 , @xmath165 and @xmath166 . as seen above , the transition time @xmath159 is typically several days . this timescale is expected to allow the follow - up observations @xcite . thus , we should consider both phases to predict something useful for follow - up observations . if we fix @xmath80 and @xmath39 and use @xmath41 , equation ( [ sec2 - 2 - 2:t_times ] ) gives @xmath167 . if we increase the total mass of the ejecta @xmath53 and the velocity at the inner edge of the ejecta @xmath43 , the mass density of the ejecta @xmath168 and hence the optical depth are increased . as a result , the transition time @xmath159 becomes large . first , we consider the @xmath0-process model . here , we introduce the velocity @xmath169 based on the homologous relation . using the velocity @xmath170 and equation ( [ sec2 - 2 - 2:r_diff ] ) for the mass density ( equation [ sec2 - 1:rho ] ) , the evolution of temperature is @xmath171 for @xmath87 and @xmath41 , the evolution is described by @xmath172 so that the observed temperature increases with time . the bolometric luminosity is described as the product of the mass between @xmath70 and @xmath123 and the nuclear heating rate @xmath89 . using equations ( [ sec2 - 1:dotepsilon ] ) and ( [ sec2 - 2 - 2:r_diff ] ) , we obtain the bolometric luminosity as , @xmath173 for @xmath87 and @xmath41 , the evolution of the bolometric luminosity is @xmath174 . next , we consider the engine model . using equations ( [ sec2 - 1:t ] ) and ( [ sec2 - 2 - 2:r_diff ] ) , the evolution of the observed temperature is described as @xmath175 for @xmath41 , the value @xmath176 is the boundary whether the observed temperature increases with time ( @xmath100 ) or not ( @xmath146 ) . the evolution of the luminosity equals to the total radiation created by thermal emission in the sphere with radius @xmath70 . using the relation @xmath177 and equations ( [ sec2 - 2 - 2:r_diff ] ) and ( [ sec2 - 2 - 2:t_obs , sh ] ) , we obtain @xmath178 if we take @xmath41 and @xmath179 , the evolution of the bolometric luminosity is @xmath180 . this is almost the same dependence as in the @xmath0-process model . note that even if the inner part of the ejecta has the larger internal energy ( @xmath100 ) , the bolometric luminosity does not always increase with time . using the relation @xmath181 , from the adiabatic cooling , the evolution of bolometric luminosity for a given mass shell with @xmath12 is @xmath182 , where @xmath183 is the total internal energy for the mass shell with a given expanding velocity @xmath12 . since @xmath184 and @xmath185 , the bolometric luminosity increases with time for the value of the temperature index @xmath186 . once the diffusion radius reaches the inner edge of the ejecta @xmath187 , all photons emitted from the ejecta can diffuse out within dynamical timescale . if energy is not injected into the ejecta in this transparent phase , the internal energy in the ejecta runs out immediately . the transition time from the thick - diffusion phase to the transparent phase @xmath188 is described as @xmath189 where we use the diffusion radius @xmath190 . first we consider the @xmath0-process model . the observed temperature equals to the temperature at the inner edge of the ejecta , @xmath191^{1/4}$ ] . using equation ( [ sec2 - 1:rho ] ) , we obtain @xmath192 since the energy is continuously injected due to the nuclear heating in the @xmath0-process model , the bolometric luminosity from the entire ejecta is described as @xmath193 . however , the outer part of the ejecta emits photons with lower temperature and/or x - rays and @xmath194-rays produced directly in radioactive decays . although such emission contributes to the bolometric luminosity , we here focus only on the optical and infrared emissions . in the thick - diffusion phase , the observed emission comes from the region between @xmath195 and @xmath196 . in the transparent phase , we assume that the time evolution of the diffusion radius @xmath70 is the same as the thick - diffusion phase until @xmath197 and the observed luminosity comes from the region from @xmath198 to @xmath123 for simplicity . then , the bolometric luminosity is described as @xmath199 although it appears that this time evolution directly reflects the nuclear decay rate , when we calculate the mass between @xmath198 and @xmath123 the evolution of the upper limit of the integration @xmath123 makes the decrease of the luminosity faster than @xmath200 ( see a dashed line in the middle panel of figure [ figure : evolution ] ) . in addition , the evolution of @xmath70 depends on the index @xmath36 ( see equation [ sec2 - 2 - 2:r_diff ] ) , so that the mass between @xmath198 and @xmath123 also depends on the index @xmath36 . next we consider the engine model . we assume that the internal energy is exhausted when the diffusion radius reaches @xmath197 . for the observed temperature @xmath135 , we assume the relation @xmath201 and use equation ( [ sec2 - 1:t ] ) , @xmath202 the bolometric luminosity is described as @xmath203 since the internal energy at the innermost region almost equals to the total internal energy @xmath204 and determines the bolometric luminosity @xmath205 for the temperature index @xmath100 , the bolometric luminosity does not depend on the mass @xmath53 and velocities @xmath39 and @xmath43 . this luminosity always corresponds to the maximum luminosity for @xmath147 , so that we can impose the lower limit on the parameter @xmath101 . -process model and the engine model , respectively . for comparison , we also plot the bolometric luminosity from the whole ejecta for the @xmath0-process model after the transparent phase ( @xmath206 in equation [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_tr ] ) as a blue long - dashed line in the middle panel.,width=264 ] we show the temporal evolution of the diffusion radius @xmath70 , the bolometric luminosity @xmath143 and the observed temperature @xmath135 in figure [ figure : evolution ] under the fiducial parameter set . the parameters are summarized in the first column of table 1 . here , we do not use approximations @xmath207 and @xmath208 at the thin - diffusion phase as in section [ thin ] . instead , the diffusion radius @xmath70 is calculated from equations ( [ sec2 - 1:t_diff ] ) ( [ sec2 - 1:tau ] ) without approximations . using the obtained diffusion radius @xmath70 and the relation @xmath169 , we calculate the observed temperatures in the thin- and thick - diffusion phases , @xmath209^{1/4}$ ] ( equation [ sec2 - 2 - 2:t_obs , nuc ] ) , and @xmath210 ( equation [ sec2 - 2 - 2:t_obs , sh ] ) for the @xmath0-process and the engine models , respectively . in the transparent phase , the temperature in equations ( [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_obs , nuc ] ) and ( [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_obs , sh ] ) are evaluated with @xmath211 . equations on observed temperature and bolometric luminosity for both models are summarized in appendix . the set of parameters we choose here explains the observed optical and infrared light curves of grb 130603b ( see next section ) . the vertical dash - dotted lines in figure [ figure : evolution ] show the time @xmath212 ( equation [ sec2 - 2 - 2:t_times ] ) . the diffusion radius is plotted only up to the transition time @xmath213 ( equation [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_tr ] ) . in the thick - diffusion phase , the diffusion radius ( @xmath214 for @xmath41 ) moves inward in the ejecta ( @xmath215 ) . since the observed luminosity and temperature are determined at the diffusion radius @xmath70 , the time evolution of luminosity and temperature strongly depends on the indices of the profile , @xmath36 and @xmath95 . for the @xmath0-process model , the bolometric luminosity decreases with time ( @xmath216 ) in the thick - diffusion phase ( see equation [ sec2 - 2 - 2:l_bol , nuc ] ) , which is more rapid than that in the thin - diffusion phase ( @xmath217 , see equation [ sec2 - 2 - 1:l_bol , nuc ] ) . since the index of the mass density @xmath41 is close to 3 , in which the mass of each shell with a certain size @xmath218 is the same value in logarithmic scale , the mass between the diffusion radius @xmath70 and its doubled value @xmath123 does not significantly change with time . the luminosity is mainly determined by that mass , so that the evolution of the luminosity is slow compared with the evolution of nuclear heating rate ( @xmath200 ) in the thick - diffusion phase . on the other hand , bolometric luminosity and observed temperature increase with time in the engine model with the parameter set of the fiducial model . these mainly reflect the profile of the temperature distribution ( @xmath219 ) . in fact , using equation ( [ sec2 - 2 - 2:l_bol , sh ] ) , the index of the time @xmath34 for the bolometric luminosity is @xmath220 for the engine model . after the transition time @xmath221 , the luminosity and temperature are almost determined by the quantities at the inner edge of the ejecta . then , the evolution of the luminosity and temperature does not significantly depend on the indices of profile @xmath36 and @xmath95 as in the case of the thin - diffusion phase ( except for the case @xmath146 of the engine model , equation [ sec2 - 2 - 3:l_bol , sh ] ) . since our used profile of mass density has an artificially steep cut - off at the inner edge of the ejecta ( figure [ figure : diffuse ] ) , bolometric luminosity in both models rapidly declines after the time @xmath221 . in the bottom panel of figure [ figure : evolution ] , the observed temperature in both models has a steep cutoff at @xmath197 . for comparison , we also consider the time evolution of bolometric luminosity from the whole ejecta @xmath222 in the @xmath0-process model . time evolution is shown in the middle panel of figure [ figure : evolution ] as a blue long - dashed line . this luminosity evolution ( @xmath223 ) is significantly slower than that of the engine model in the transparent phase . in section [ implication ] , we discuss the implication for discriminating the @xmath0-process model and the engine model using these temporal behaviors . -process model ) . since two regions are overlapped , the color looks like purple for the @xmath0-process model . these regions are only a schematic view . we fix @xmath42 , @xmath41 , @xmath224 erg s@xmath22 g@xmath22 and @xmath87 . for the opacity @xmath80 , we use the range @xmath225 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 . for the engine model , we treat @xmath101 and @xmath95 as free parameters to fit the light curve . the circle , square and triangle denote the case of the fiducial model , minimum mass model and hot interior model , respectively ( see table 1).,width=377 ] we compare the results with the optical and infrared observations of short grb 130603b in figure [ figure : observation ] . the fiducial parameter set in table 1 is adopted . the @xmath0-process model and the engine model result in similar light curves at the optical and infrared bands . both of them satisfy the observational data of grb 130603b . note that the detection point at f606w band at @xmath226 s is consistent with the afterglow of grb 130603b modeled as a smoothly broken power law ( blue dashed line , * ? ? ? we regard this detected value as an upper limit for the luminosity of emission from the ejecta . the detection point at f160w band at @xmath84 s exceeds the extrapolation of the afterglow emission ( red dashed line , * ? ? ? * ) , so that we regard this detected emission as a thermal radiation from the ejecta . the range of the model parameters @xmath43 and @xmath53 to satisfy the constraints obtained from the observation of grb 130603b is shown in figure [ figure : parameter ] as colored areas ( red area for the @xmath0-process model and blue area for the engine model ) . note that the red area has a completely overlap with the blue area . we fix the other model parameters @xmath42 , @xmath41 , @xmath224 erg s@xmath22 g@xmath22 and @xmath87 as in the fiducial model . we take into account the uncertain range of the opacity , @xmath225 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 to constrain the parameters , @xmath43 and @xmath53 . in the engine model , @xmath95 and @xmath101 are additionally treated as free parameters to derive the allowed area in figure [ figure : parameter ] . in the @xmath0-process model , the luminosity becomes smaller for smaller ejecta mass @xmath53 . the small ejected mass @xmath227 can not reproduce the infrared excess of grb 130603b ( figure [ figure : observation ] ) . the required ejecta mass is relatively large compared to the mass indicated by recent numerical simulations for a merger of binary nss ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? note that in @xcite , @xmath228 is required to explain the observed infrared excess , which is a factor @xmath32 smaller than our results . their theoretical light curves are based on the study of @xcite . in @xcite , a broken power - law mass density profile with the index @xmath229 for the inner layer and @xmath230 for the outer layer of ejecta is adopted , in which the mass of the ejecta is efficiently concentrated at the transition point of the density index . therefore , the luminosity of ejecta is evaluated as the heating rate multiplied by the total ejecta mass at the moment when the diffusion radius reaches the transition point . on the other hand , the index of our mass density profile of the ejecta is @xmath231 , which is indicated by general relativistic simulations by @xcite . this profile is quite different from the profile adopted in @xcite ; the index is close to 3 , in which the mass in each logarithmic radius is constant . then , at the time @xmath232 ( equation [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_tr ] ) , the mass contributing to the luminosity is about @xmath360% of the total ejecta mass in the case @xmath233 . this profile predicts luminosity dimmer than that other studies . in fact , @xcite tried to explain the observed infrared excess using the mass profile which is almost the same with ours . in the case of a binary ns merger with ejecta mass @xmath30.02 @xmath234 , even if they use a larger nuclear heating rate ( larger by a factor of 2 ) , their predicted luminosity is slightly smaller than the observed infrared excess ( in the left panel of their figure 3 ) . this result is consistent with our model , i.e. , our model requires larger mass than most of previous studies . in the engine model , the injected internal energy which determines the luminosity does not depend on the ejecta mass ( except for the limit in equation [ sec2 - 1:e_int ] ) . however , the luminosity declines rapidly after the transition time @xmath235 which depends on the ejecta mass as in equation ( [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_tr ] ) . the condition @xmath236 s in the observer frame is required to reproduce the excess observed from grb 130603b in the near - infrared band . this condition gives the lower limit for the ejecta mass in the engine model , @xmath237 with the opacity @xmath238 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 . note that the observed upper limit on the infrared luminosity at @xmath239 s in the observer frame ( figure [ figure : observation ] ) , which corresponds to @xmath240 s , gives the upper limit on the ejecta mass for both models . however , this limit is not important for the range @xmath241 in the range of the opacity @xmath225 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 . the smaller minimum velocity @xmath43 gives the smaller bolometric luminosity at certain time in the @xmath0-process model ( see equations [ sec2 - 2 - 1:l_bol , nuc ] and [ sec2 - 2 - 2:l_bol , nuc ] ) . the small minimum velocity enlarges the size of ejecta ( when we fix the maximum velocity @xmath39 ) . then , the diffusion time @xmath58 of photons emitted from the inner region of the ejecta becomes long for the small velocity @xmath43 ( equation [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_tr ] ) . the mass between @xmath70 and @xmath123 ( or @xmath73 ) increases toward inner region of the ejecta ( as long as @xmath134 ) so that the mass is reduced for the small minimum velocity @xmath40 at certain time . in fact , the dependence of the mass on the minimum velocity is @xmath242 . as a result , smaller minimum velocity gives smaller luminosity to reproduce the observed infrared excess of grb 130603b . moreover , smaller minimum velocity gives larger temperature @xmath135 at certain time ( equations [ sec2 - 2 - 2:t_obs , nuc ] and [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_obs , nuc ] ) because mass density at a shell with small velocity is large . the difference between the detected luminosity at f160w band and the upper limit on the luminosity at f606w band at @xmath84 s in the observer frame gives the upper limit on the observed temperature ( @xmath243 k ) . to satisfy the observed upper limit on the temperature from grb 130603b , a lower limit of @xmath244 is obtained for @xmath245 . the smaller minimum velocity @xmath43 gives higher temperature @xmath135 in the engine model ( equations [ sec2 - 2 - 2:t_obs , sh ] and [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_obs , sh ] ) . the observational limit for the temperature at @xmath84 s in the observer frame indicates that the range of the minimum velocity @xmath40 is limited in the engine model ( @xmath246 for @xmath245 ) . we discuss the dependence on the value of @xmath80 . as mentioned in section 2.2 , we use the temperature - independent opacity @xmath80 with the grey approximation . in general , the @xmath0-process line opacity depends on frequency and changes with temperature and ionization state of the ejecta @xcite . the indicated grey opacity is @xmath225 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 . in the case of the @xmath0-process model , the luminosity significantly depends on opacity @xmath80 . the larger opacity causes larger diffusion time @xmath58 , so that larger time is required to observe the inner region of the ejecta for given ejecta mass @xmath53 and minimum velocity @xmath43 . in fact , two transition times @xmath159 and @xmath188 are proportional to @xmath247 ( equations [ sec2 - 2 - 2:t_times ] and [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_tr ] ) . then , the mass around the diffusion radius @xmath70 is small at certain time , so that the luminosity is reduced . as a result , in order to explain the infrared excess observed in grb 130603b , larger mass @xmath53 is required for the larger value of opacity @xmath80 . for the opacity @xmath248 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 , total ejecta mass @xmath249 is required to reproduce the observed excess , which is much larger than the simulation results of mergers of binary nss ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) . on the other hand , the transition time @xmath188 is smaller for the smaller value of the opacity . then , the luminosity significantly increases at @xmath226 s. for the opacity @xmath250 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 , there is no parameter set which gives smaller luminosity than the detection at f606w band ( @xmath226 s in the observer frame ) and the luminosity comparable to the observed excess at f160w band simultaneously in the @xmath0-process model . in the case of the engine model , a larger value of opacity @xmath80 reduces the lower limit for the mass @xmath53 to explain the observed excess . for certain temperature and luminosity , the opacity @xmath80 and the ejecta mass @xmath53 always degenerate in the form @xmath251 ( see equations [ sec2 - 2 - 1:t_obs , sh ] , [ sec2 - 2 - 1:l_bol , sh ] , [ sec2 - 2 - 2:t_obs , sh ] , [ sec2 - 2 - 2:l_bol , sh ] , [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_obs , sh ] and [ sec2 - 2 - 3:l_bol , sh ] ) . this dependence comes from the optical depth ( equation [ sec2 - 1:tau ] ) because the internal energy in the ejecta does not depend on the opacity and the ejecta mass , contrary to the @xmath0-process model . we present a parameter set to give the minimum ejecta mass @xmath53 in table 1 as the minimum mass parameter set . we also plot the value of @xmath53 and @xmath43 of this model in figure [ figure : parameter ] as a square . this ejecta mass is naturally realized in general relativistic simulations ( e.g. , * ? ? ? although the larger value of the opacity @xmath80 reduces the lower limit for the ejecta mass @xmath53 , the kinetic energy is @xmath252 erg ( equation [ sec2 - 1:e_kin ] ) which is close to the initial injected energy @xmath253 erg for the minimum mass parameter set . the lower ejecta mass @xmath53 reduces the kinetic energy of the ejecta , @xmath254 in equation ( [ sec2 - 1:e_kin ] ) , so that the required energy @xmath97 may exceed the kinetic energy of the ejecta for the larger opacity . for the small value of the opacity , larger mass and smaller minimum velocity is required to satisfy the condition @xmath236 s ( @xmath255 in equation [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_tr ] ) . for the opacity @xmath256 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 , the condition corresponds to @xmath257 . the observational constraint for the temperature also requires a large value of the minimum velocity @xmath43 . then , there is no solution to explain the observed excess within the parameter range shown in figure [ figure : parameter ] for the opacity @xmath258 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 . therefore , for the small opacity @xmath259 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 the engine model can not explain the observed excess . since the engine model has additional free parameters , @xmath95 and @xmath101 , the allowed region of the parameters is larger than that of the @xmath0-process model . we can impose the lower limit on the parameter @xmath101 by regarding the infrared luminosity @xmath27 erg s@xmath22 at @xmath260 day as bolometric luminosity in the source rest frame with equation ( [ sec2 - 2 - 3:l_bol , sh ] ) . the derived limit is @xmath261 . to satisfy the optical upper limit at @xmath226 s and the detected luminosity at @xmath84 s in the observer frame ( figure [ figure : observation ] ) , we find the lower limit on the index of the temperature profile @xmath262 . for a smaller value of the index @xmath95 , emission from the ejecta with relatively high temperature can be observed at time @xmath226 s , so that luminosity at f606w band is larger than the observed upper limit of grb 130603b . in addition , the smaller value of @xmath95 decreases relative internal energy in the inner edge of the ejecta . to reproduce the luminosity at time @xmath263 s in the observer frame when observed emission comes from the inner ejecta , the smaller @xmath95 requires the larger initial internal energy @xmath97 which exceeds the kinetic energy of the ejecta @xmath105 in some cases . several deep optical observations of short grbs give stringent upper limits on the luminosity of macronovae @xcite . we compare the results with two deep optical observations of short grbs , grb 050509b and grb 080905a . for the fiducial parameter set , the luminosity exceeds the observational upper limits on these two observations . in the engine model , we can reduce the luminosity in the early phase @xmath264 s without reducing the luminosity in the late phase @xmath84 s by utilizing the steep temperature profile ( large @xmath95 ) . here , we introduce the hot interior parameter set with larger value of index @xmath95 than that of the fiducial parameter set . since emission from the inner part of the ejecta is observed at the later time , the luminosity at the early phase decreases and avoids the observational limits if most of the internal energy is injected to the inner part of the ejecta . we show the light curve of the hot interior parameter set in figure [ figure : observation2 ] . we choose the parameters as @xmath265 and @xmath266 ( the right column of table 1 ) . from figure [ figure : observation2 ] , the light curves are consistent with all three observations using the same model parameters . a possible scenario for the hot interior parameter set is that the shock produced by the activity of the central engine may not be able to catch up with the outer part of the ejecta because the velocity of the ejecta is close to the light speed ( @xmath42 ) . then , only the inner part of the ejecta will be heated . for comparison , we also show the light curves in the @xmath0-process model with the parameter set of the hot interior in figure [ figure : observation2 ] as dashed lines . the luminosity of the @xmath0-process model exceeds the observed upper limits in two observations , grb 050509b and grb 080905a ( left and middle panels of figure [ figure : observation2 ] ) if we choose the parameter set of the hot interior model . we are not able to find any parameter set in the @xmath0-process model , which simultaneously satisfies the observed limits of the three observations . note that we do not argue that the @xmath0-process model is excluded from these results because we need to take into account the variations of the model parameters for each event . note that the extended emission was not detected in three short grbs . however , it is not unreasonable to miss the extended emission of these bursts . one possibility is a selection effect . observationally , the fraction of short grbs with extended emission is significantly larger at softer energy bands : @xmath325% in the swift bat samples ( @xmath26715 kev ; * ? ? ? * ) and @xmath37% in the batse samples ( @xmath26720 kev ; * ? ? ? this suggests that observations with a low energy threshold may dramatically increase short grbs with extended emission @xcite . this will be further tested by future soft x - ray survey facilities such as wide - field maxi ( 0.7 - 10 kev ) @xcite . the three referred short grbs were detected by swift bat and therefore swift bat could not detect extended emission by chance . alternatively , the outflow following the main short grb jet could not breakout the ejecta . @xcite and @xcite investigated the propagation of jets in merger ejecta . they found the cases that relativistic jets can penetrate merger ejecta and produce the prompt emission of short grbs , but in the late energy injection cases , outflow fails to breakout the ejecta . therefore , some extended emission may not be observed , although the central engine works actively . -process model on the shape of the front of the ejecta . we plot the case of grb 130603b . thick - dashed lines denote the fiducial model . thin - solid , thin - dashed , and thin - dot - dashed lines correspond to the exponential profiles of mass density ( equation [ sec3:rho ] ) with @xmath268 and @xmath269 , respectively . we also plot the observational data from @xcite.,width=302 ] in the thin - diffusion phase , the light curve strongly depends on the density profile of the ejecta surface . the density profile is determined by the complex merger dynamics @xcite , so that the density profile of the ejecta can not be analytically derived as mentioned in section 2.3 . since the outer part of the density profile is difficult to calculate precisely , little attention has paid on the mass profile at the outer region in current numerical simulations . in order to investigate the dependence of the light curve on the mass profiles in the thin - diffusion phase , we consider other forms of the mass profile and compare the light curve with that of equation ( [ sec2 - 1:rho ] ) . we adopt an exponential profile @xmath270 we introduce an additional free parameter @xmath271 and the ejecta expand @xmath272 . the calculations are the same except for using @xmath273 . we fix the mass with velocity larger than @xmath274 and calculate three models for @xmath275 . for the other parameters , we adopt from the fiducial parameter set in table 1 . we show the results in the @xmath0-process model in figure [ figure : exp_comp ] . since we fix the mass with velocity larger than @xmath274 , the bolometric luminosities at the time @xmath276 are almost the same values . in the thin - diffusion phase ( @xmath277 ) , both the luminosity and the temperature are smaller than the fiducial model . this is because the density at the front of the ejecta is reduced in this mass profile . since the maximum velocity effectively becomes large and the adiabatic cooling becomes efficient , these effects for luminosity and temperature should be also seen in the engine model . we conclude that the luminosities in the thin - diffusion phase ( @xmath277 ) have uncertainties at least with @xmath278 mag , which originates from the uncertainty of the outermost mass profile . note that the emission from the ejecta with the mass profile discussed here reduces the tension between the light curve in the @xmath0-process model and the upper limits of the deep optical observations ( grb 050509 and grb 080905a ) as discussed in section [ other ] . especially , the optical luminosity in the case @xmath279 ( thin - dot - dashed line ) significantly decreases after @xmath280 s. therefore , the ejecta with relatively shallow mass distribution at the front of the ejecta is able to explain the current optical follow - up observations in the @xmath0-process model . in the fiducial parameter set , the light curves for two models in the optical and infrared bands are similar ( figure [ figure : observation ] ) . in figure [ figure : parameter ] , the allowed parameter region to explain the observation of grb 130603b for both models are also overlapped . recall that emission from ejecta is described as blackbody radiation for the two models , whose spectrum is narrow in bands . therefore , no excess at other wavelengths is expected and also the prediction is consistent with radio observations @xcite . therefore , it is difficult to discriminate two models from the currently available observational data . in the @xmath0-process model , the light curve with mass profile @xmath35 ( @xmath281 ) and a parameter set which explains the infrared excess detected from grb 130603b can not explain the upper limits obtained from the deep optical observations of some short grbs . therefore , if both stringent optical upper limits at @xmath226 s and bright infrared emission at @xmath84 s are simultaneously obtained from a single event ( with a difference larger than two magnitudes @xmath282 mag ) , the @xmath0-process model is significantly restricted . for the engine model , these observations give a constraint for the temperature distribution in the ejecta , which may give new insights into the activity of the central engine . as shown in the middle panel of figure [ figure : evolution ] , the bolometric luminosity in the @xmath0-process model from the whole ejecta ( blue long - dashed line ) , including low temperature and/or x - rays and @xmath194-rays produced directly in radioactive decays @xcite , declines more gradually than that for the engine model . this is because there is no energy injection after the time @xmath283 for the engine model . then , the luminosity significantly decreases when photons at the inner edge of the ejecta begin to diffuse out ( see the middle panel of figure [ figure : evolution ] and figure [ figure : observation ] ) . the luminosity from the whole ejecta can be described as @xmath193 in the transparent phase . the index of time @xmath34 is determined by the nuclear heating rate , @xmath284 . therefore , the two models are distinguishable by observing the temporal evolution of bolometric luminosity from the whole ejecta in this phase . we calculated the light curves of macronovae by developing analytical models . we modeled the ejecta based on the results of numerical simulations for a merger of binary nss . in addition to the nuclear decay of @xmath0-process elements ( the @xmath0-process model which is often discussed ) , we considered another heating mechanism for the ejecta , the engine - driven shock ( engine model ) . we compared the results with the optical and infrared observations of the first macronova candidate associated with grb 130603b , and showed that both models can explain the observations . in order to reproduce the observed light curve , the @xmath0-process model requires relatively large ejecta mass @xmath285 which is mainly determined by the observed infrared luminosity @xmath27 erg s@xmath22 at @xmath84 s. in the engine model , the internal energy of ejecta , which mainly determines the observed luminosity , does not depend on the ejecta mass . then , unless the entire of the ejecta is effectively thin ( the diffusion time is smaller than the dynamical time , @xmath286 , at the inner edge of the ejecta ) , s in the engine model , the luminosity rapidly decreases after the time @xmath287 when photons can diffuse out from the inner edge of the ejecta ( section [ transparent ] ) . ] the required ejecta mass is @xmath237 , which is comparable to the recent numerical simulation results . the initial internal energy @xmath97 and the injection time @xmath13 are required as @xmath288 , which is consistent with the observed extended emission of short grbs , @xmath10 erg and @xmath11 s. the required minimum velocity is about @xmath289 for both models , which is mainly determined by the constraint for the observed temperature @xmath29 k at @xmath84 s. for the range of the opacity @xmath250 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 , it is difficult for both models to explain the observations of macronova associated with grb 130603b by the ejecta mass less than @xmath241 . if macronovae are identical , the upper limits on the luminosity obtained in the deep optical observations of other short grbs give stringent constraints on the @xmath0-process model . on the other hand , the engine model satisfies these constraints if the temperature profile is centrally concentrated in the ejecta ( large @xmath95 ) . thus , if the difference between the optical magnitude at @xmath226 s and the infrared magnitude at @xmath84 s is larger than @xmath290 mag in a single event , the @xmath0-process model is difficult to explain the observations unless the front of the ejecta has much shallow mass distribution . another difference in the light curves between two models is the bolometric luminosity at the transparent phase when dynamical time is smaller than the diffusion time at the inner edge of the ejecta @xmath198 . although the optical and infrared luminosities rapidly decrease in the transparent phase , the bolometric luminosity from the whole ejecta , including lower frequency than near - infrared band and/or x - rays and @xmath194-rays produced directly in radioactive decays , is determined by the energy injection rate of nuclear decay , @xmath291 . for the engine model , the bolometric luminosity decreases rapidly in this phase ( faster than @xmath292 ) . therefore , we expect that the light curve of the bolometric luminosity from the whole ejecta can distinguish between two heating mechanisms . our results show that early light curves depend on the density profile of the outermost edge of the ejecta . it is necessary to develop a method to calculate the low - density region of the ejecta in either the analytical or numerical ways in order to precisely predict the early light curves of macronovae . we thank k. asano , k. kashiyama , k. kiuchi , h. nagakura , t. nakamura , y. sekiguchi , m. shibata for fruitful discussions . this work is supported by kakenhi 24103006 ( s.k . , k.i . ) , 24.9375 ( h.t . ) , 24000004 , 26247042 , 26287051 ( k.i . ) . we summarize the formula for the observed temperature and bolometric luminosity . the detailed derivation of equations in this section is described in sections 2 and 3 . since we assume that the observed luminosity and temperature approximate the luminosity and temperature at the diffusion radius @xmath70 ( section 3 ) , we need to calculate the diffusion radius . for the dynamics of the ejecta , we assume an isotropic and homologous expansion . then , the velocity of ejecta @xmath12 is described by equation ( [ sec2:v ] ) @xmath293 where the radius @xmath0 originates the central engine and the time @xmath34 is measured from the time when a compact binary merges . as in section [ fiducial ] , we calculate the diffusion radius @xmath70 from the condition that the diffusion time equals the dynamical time , @xmath71 . the diffusion time is described by equation ( [ sec2 - 1:t_diff ] ) as @xmath294 where @xmath295 is the speed of the light , @xmath77 is the optical depth described by equation ( [ sec2 - 1:tau ] ) as @xmath296 and @xmath65 is the width of the diffusion region described by the equation ( [ sec2 - 1:deltar ] ) as @xmath297 in the calculation of the optical depth @xmath77 , we use the spatially uniform value of the optical depth @xmath80 with grey approximation and the ejecta mass density @xmath298 described by equation ( [ sec2 - 1:rho ] ) as , @xmath299 where @xmath50 and @xmath51 are normalized factors , and @xmath43 is the velocity at the inner edge of the ejecta . the radius @xmath73 is the outer edge of the ejecta , described by equation ( [ sec2 - 1:r_out ] ) as @xmath300 where the velocity @xmath39 is at the outer edge of the ejecta . the radius at the inner edge of the ejecta @xmath198 is described by equation ( [ sec2 - 1:r_in ] ) as @xmath301 the normalization factor @xmath52 in the profile of the mass density is determined by the ejecta mass @xmath53 ( in equation [ sec2 - 1:m_ej ] ) as @xmath302 we consider two heating sources of the ejecta . in the @xmath0-process model , the internal energy of the ejecta is determined by the nuclear heating rate of the @xmath0-process element described in equation ( [ sec2 - 1:dotepsilon ] ) as @xmath303 for the engine model , we assume the temperature profile of the ejecta @xmath304 as a result of the activity of the central engine , described in equation ( [ sec2 - 1:t ] ) as @xmath305 where @xmath96 is the normalization factor . this factor is determined by injected internal energy @xmath97 at the time @xmath13 , which is described in equation ( [ sec2 - 1:e_int ] ) as @xmath306 observed temperatures in the @xmath0-process model and the engine model are given by @xmath307^{1/4 } } \\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(r_{\rm diff}>r_{\rm in } ) \\ \\ { \displaystyle \left[\frac{\dot{\epsilon}t\rho(t , v_{\min})}{a}\right]^{1/4 } } \\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(0.5r_{\rm in } < r_{\rm diff } \le r_{\rm in } ) \\ \\ { \displaystyle 0 } \\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(r_{\rm diff } \le 0.5r_{\rm in } ) , \\ \end{array } \right.\end{aligned}\ ] ] and by @xmath308 respectively . note that we do not use the approximation @xmath309 and @xmath310 in the thin - diffusion case . the bolometric luminosities for the @xmath0-process model and the engine model are given by @xmath311 and @xmath312 respectively . an example of the calculated result is shown in figure [ figure : evolution ] . we present the numerical values with the parameter dependence for later use . unlike equations ( [ sec2 - 2 - 2:t_times ] ) and ( [ sec2 - 2 - 3:t_tr ] ) , we include the contribution from subdominant terms to the numerical values when we integrate equations . some of the subdominant terms include the ratio @xmath313 . hereafter , the value @xmath314 in subdominant terms are fixed and are not included in the parameter dependence . we introduce the normalized quantities @xmath164 , @xmath315 , @xmath166 , @xmath316 cm@xmath2 g@xmath22 , @xmath317 erg and @xmath318 s. for other parameters , we fix the index of the mass density profile @xmath41 and the parameters of the nuclear heating rate @xmath224 erg s@xmath22 g@xmath22 and @xmath87 . we also introduce the normalized time @xmath319 s and @xmath320 s. the values of observed temperature and bolometric luminosity in the thin - diffusion phase are @xmath321 and @xmath322 respectively . the transition time from the thin - diffusion phase to the thick - diffusion phase @xmath159 is @xmath323cv_{\max}}\left(\frac{v_{\max}}{v_{\min}}\right)^{3-\beta } } \nonumber \\ \nonumber \\ & \sim&4.53\times10 ^ 5~\kappa_{10}^{0.5}m_{\rm ej,0.1}^{0.5}v_{\min,0.1}^{0.25}v_{\max,0.4}^{-0.75}~{\rm s}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the values of the observed temperature and bolometric luminosity in the thick - diffusion phase are @xmath324 and @xmath325 respectively . note that since the diffusion radius @xmath70 can not be analytically described in the thin - diffusion phase , we use the approximations @xmath309 and @xmath310 in equations ( [ app : t_obs , thin ] ) and ( [ app : l_bol , thin ] ) . these approximations make discontinuity at the transition time @xmath159 . the ratios of the temperature in the thick - diffusion phase to the temperature in the thin - diffusion phase for the @xmath0-process @xmath326 and the engine model @xmath327 at the time @xmath159 are @xmath328 and @xmath329 respectively . the ratios of the luminosity in the thick - diffusion phase to the luminosity in the thin - diffusion phase for the @xmath0-process model @xmath330 and the engine model @xmath331 at the time @xmath159 are @xmath332 and @xmath333 respectively . the transition time from the thick - diffusion phase to the transparent phase @xmath188 is @xmath334cv_{\min } } } \nonumber \\ \nonumber \\ & \sim&7.62\times10 ^ 5~\kappa_{10}^{0.5}m_{\rm ej,0.1}^{0.5}v_{\min,0.1}^{-0.5}~{\rm s}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we introduce another transition time @xmath335 when the upper limit of the integral for the luminosity @xmath123 reaches the inner edge of the ejecta @xmath198 , @xmath336 the values of the observed temperature and bolometric luminosity in the transparent phase ( @xmath337 ) are @xmath338 and @xmath339 } \\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(r-{\rm process } ) \\ \\ { \displaystyle 1.33\times10^{41}~~{\rm erg~s}^{-1 } } \\ ~~{\displaystyle \times e_{\rm int0,51}t_{\rm inj,2}t_6^{-2}\left[1-\left(\frac{t}{t_{\rm tr2}}\right)^{1.333}\right ] } \\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~({\rm engine},~\xi=1 ) , \\ \\ { \displaystyle 1.00\times10^{41}~~{\rm erg~s}^{-1 } } \\ ~~{\displaystyle \times e_{\rm int0,51}t_{\rm inj,2}t_6^{-2}\left[1-\left(\frac{t}{t_{\rm tr2}}\right)^{6.667}\right ] } \\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~({\rm engine},~\xi=2 ) , \\ \\ { \displaystyle 1.00\times10^{41}~~{\rm erg~s}^{-1 } } \\ ~~{\displaystyle \times e_{\rm int0,51}t_{\rm inj,2}t_6^{-2}\left[1-\left(\frac{t}{t_{\rm tr2}}\right)^{12}\right ] } \\ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~({\rm engine},~\xi=3 ) , \\ \end{array } \right.\end{aligned}\ ] ] respectively . Abstract:
[ "a macronova ( kilonova ) was discovered with a short gamma - ray burst , grb 130603b , which is widely believed to be powered by the radioactivity of @xmath0-process elements synthesized in the ejecta of a neutron star binary merger . as an alternative , we propose that macronovae are energized by the central engine , i.e. , a black hole or neutron star , and the injected energy is emitted after the adiabatic expansion of ejecta . this engine model is motivated by extended emission of short grbs . in order to compare the theoretical models with observations , we develop analytical formulae for the light curves of macronovae . the engine model allows a wider parameter range , especially smaller ejecta mass , and better fit to observations than the @xmath0-process model . future observations of electromagnetic counterparts of gravitational waves should distinguish energy sources and constrain the activity of central engine and the @xmath0-process nucleosynthesis ." ]
13,012
13,012
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: roughly one - third of _ kepler _ s planet candidates announced by @xcite are associated with targets that have more than one candidate planet . false positives ( fps ) plague ground - based transit searches , but the exquisite quality of _ kepler _ photometry , combined with the ability to measure small deviations in center of light during transits @xcite , have been used to cleanse the sample prior to presentation in @xcite . accounting for candidates on each one s individual merit , @xcite estimated the fidelity of _ kepler _ s planet candidates ( fraction of the candidates expected to be actual planets ) to be above @xmath0 . yet the fidelity of multiple planet candidates is likely to be higher than that for singles @xcite . we show herein that the vast majority of _ kepler _ s multiple planet candidates are true multiple planet systems . the majority of _ kepler _ planet discoveries announced to date have been confirmed dynamically , using radial velocity variations of the target star or departures of observed transit times from a linear ephemeris ( transit timing variations , ttvs ) . however , three of the first sixteen _ kepler _ planets do not have dynamical evidence supporting the discovery , but rather these planets have been `` validated '' by showing that the probability that the observed signal is produced by a planet around the host star is at least 100 times as large as that of a false positive @xcite . for these three planets , the validation process was based on the results of the blender code , which performs detailed comparisons between the observed _ kepler _ lightcurve and the lightcurves predicted for an ensemble of theoretically conceivable fps to reject fp models that are not consistent with the observations . blender then sums the _ a priori _ probability for the allowed false positives and compares that to the _ a priori _ probability for the planet model . blender validates a planet when the resulting odds ratio very strongly favors the planet model . although all three of these planets orbit stars that also have dynamically - confirmed planets , planetary multiplicity was not used quantitatively to aid in their validation . @xcite do a more cursory analysis , but one that is far easier , enabling them to perform it for all of the candidate planets ( `` candidates '' , henceforth ) that are listed in the @xcite paper . the study by @xcite assumes a flat 20% planet occurrence rate as a prior for their bayesian analysis ( i.e. , the average number of planets per star is assumed to be 0.2 ) , and they do not consider planets orbiting background stars to be fps . @xcite use the depth and period of the transit , together with the magnitude , stellar properties and galactic latitude of the target star ( henceforth `` target '' ) to provide an upper bound on the fp prior ; for high snr transits , this upper bound on the fp prior can be much higher than the one computed using detailed lightcurve matching by blender to rule out many fp scenarios @xcite . indeed , @xcite do not examine _ kepler _ lightcurves , but rather assume for their calculations that various false - positive vetting procedures using _ kepler _ photometry have been done , such as elimination of candidates with v - shaped lightcurves or where the centroid of light received on the _ kepler _ focal plane is in a different position during a transit than it is outside of transit , and that the planet candidates show no evidence for being fps . however , these cuts were not applied to all of the candidates listed in @xcite . some candidates were not vetted as extensively as assumed by @xcite , and other candidates did not pass one of the cleanness tests but still remain viable , if somewhat more suspect , planetary candidates ( e.g. , grazing planetary transits , as well as grazing stellar eclipses , produce v - shaped lightcurves ) , and thus remain on @xcite s candidate list . we develop herein a quantitative method to estimate the true planet fraction of the overall sample of _ kepler _ candidate multiple planets that is based upon the observation that there are far more multiples than would be expected for a random distribution of candidates among _ kepler _ targets @xcite . this `` overabundance '' of multiples is illustrated by the fact that fewer than 1% of targets have a candidate on @xcite s candidate list , whereas more than 15% of targets with at least one candidate have multiple candidates , and more than 25% of targets with at least two candidates have a third candidate . such a result is expected if planets often appear within systems of planets , especially if such systems tend to be flat in the distribution of inclinations . high multiplicity , low inclination , planetary systems are consistent with _ kepler _ observations @xcite . we describe an approach to validation of specific multiple planet system candidates that is intermediate between those of @xcite and blender , and we apply these techniques to validate the very flat and dynamically - packed koi-707 system . in this approach , applied herein exclusively to koi-707 , we examine the target and candidates individually , supplementing the _ kepler _ input catalog ( kic , * ? ? ? * ) with spectroscopic observations of the target and high - resolution imaging , including keck guider camera exposures and speckle imaging @xcite and/or adaptive optics @xcite , to search for other stars in the target aperture . we check the lightcurve for a shape consistent with a transit . we verify that the centroid motion is nil or consistent with a transit around the target star and not a transit/ eclipse of any other stars observed nearby . but we do not perform detailed matching of observed lightcurves to fp scenarios . we then use multiplicity to effectively increase the planet priors and allow for validation in a bayesian sense . note that for candidate giant ( @xmath1 1 jupiter radius ) planets , one would need to consider the possibility of the transit signal being produced by a late m star partially eclipsing the target star ( perhaps with dilution ) ; for smaller candidates , the possibility of transits of fainter stars by larger planets must be taken into account . the probability of a candidate in a multiple system being a false positive is contrasted to that of a single candidate in section 2 . other factors involved in validating transiting planet candidates are discussed in section 3 . we apply our method to the koi-707 candidate multi - planet system in section 4 . we conclude in section 5 with a summary of our results and a discussion of their implications . _ kepler _ has found far more multiple candidate systems than would be the case if candidates were randomly distributed among target stars @xcite . false positives are expected to be nearly randomly distributed among _ kepler _ targets , whereas true transiting planets could be clustered if planets whose sizes and periods are adequate for transits to be detected often come in multiples , as is the case for planets detected by radial velocity variations @xcite , and/or if planetary systems tend to be flat , so geometry leads to higher transit probabilities for other planets if one planet is seen to transit @xcite . we quantify the excess of multiples and its implications for the overall fidelity of the sample of multiple candidates in this section . we use the following notation and input parameters : the number of planet candidates is @xmath2 , the number of targets with two or more candidates , i.e. , the number of candidate multiple planet systems , is @xmath3 , and the number of targets from which the sample is drawn is @xmath4 = 160,171 . these numerical values are taken from @xcite , who removed from the 1235 candidates listed in @xcite those objects that were estimated to have radii greater than twice that of jupiter , those for which only one transit had been observed , and those identified as fps by @xcite . we denote the number of actual planets among the candidates as @xmath5 , the number of false positives as @xmath6 , and the fidelity of the sample ( fraction of candidates that are planets ) as @xmath7 , so @xmath8 and @xmath9 . for our calculations in equations ( 19 ) , we make the following two assumptions : \i ) fps are randomly distributed among the targets ; \ii ) there is no correlation between the probability of a target to host one or more detectable planets and to display fps . in contrast , we do not assume that planets are randomly distributed among the targets . the previous verifications of the two - planet kepler-10 system @xcite , the three - planet kepler-9 @xcite and kepler-18 systems @xcite , and especially the six - planet kepler-11 system @xcite , provide strong evidence of the non - random distribution of transiting planets among _ kepler _ target stars . the above two assumptions , together with observed values of @xmath10 , @xmath11 and @xmath4 and an assumed lower bound on @xmath7 , allow us to estimate lower bounds on the fidelity of candidates in various classes of candidate multi - planet systems using simple algebra . for example , assumption ( 1 ) implies that the expected number of targets with @xmath12 false positives , @xmath13 , is given by a poisson distribution of @xmath4 members whose mean is given by the average number of false positives per target , @xmath14 . this expectation value is given by the following formula : @xmath15 where the approximation in equation ( 1 ) is valid for @xmath16 . we next compute the expected number of _ kepler _ targets with multiple candidates at least one of which is a fp . in some cases , we make approximations that yield conservative estimates of the expected numbers of true planets ( i.e. , overestimate the expected number of fps ) . our results , presented in equations ( 27 ) , are given first as general formulae , then as a function of the fraction of candidates that are true planets , @xmath7 , for the observed values of 160,171 targets , 1199 candidates , and 170 multiple candidate systems stated above , and finally these value if @xmath7 = 0.5 or 0.9 because we consider it to be a reasonable estimate of the actual planet fidelity rate , and @xmath17 to show that even for an overall fp rate far higher than studies suggest , the expected number of fps among the multis is remarkably low . ] . these final numbers are to be compared to the observation that there are 115 candidate 2-planet systems , with a total of 230 planet candidates , and 55 candidate systems of 3 or more transiting planets , with a total of 178 planet candidates . equation ( 1 ) yields estimates of the number of targets with two or three false positives : @xmath18 @xmath19 the number of targets expected to have four or more false positives is very small and can be neglected for our purposes . equation ( 1 ) also yields the expected number of targets with a single fp under the same assumptions , 597.3 or 119.8 . the assumed lack of correlation between the propensity of a target to have false positives and true planets implies that the probability that a given target hosts both a planet and one or more false positive is equal to the product of these individual probabilities . the probability of a target having a detected transiting planet is given by @xmath20 , and the probability of it showing a false positive is given by equation ( 1 ) . thus , the estimated numbers of targets with at least one planet as well as one or more false positives are given by : @xmath21 @xmath22 the number of targets expected to have both a planet and three or more false positives is very small and can be neglected for our purposes . somewhat lower estimates of the number of multi- candidate systems with one planet and at least one fp than given by equations ( 4 ) and ( 5 ) can be derived by noting that the observed multiplicity implies fewer ( than @xmath10 ) targets with a nonzero number of planet candidates . to derive an estimate of the expected number of targets with multiple true planets as well as at least one fp , replace the term in equations ( 4 ) and ( 5 ) that represents the probability of a given target having a true planet , @xmath20 , with a term representing the probability of a given target having a multi - planet system , @xmath23 . ( assuming all multis are multi - planet systems to estimate of this term is conservative in the sense that it may lead to an overestimate in the number of false positives in multi - candidate systems . ) @xmath24 @xmath25 the number of targets expected to have both multiple planets and three or more false positives is extremely small and can be neglected for our purposes . adding up the above estimates of fps of different types yields expected totals of 4.5 or 0.9 fps ( for assumed fp rates of 50% and 10% , respectively ) in doubles ( compared to a total of 230 candidates ) and 0.65 or 0.13 fps in systems with three or more candidates ( compared to a total of 178 candidates ) . these numbers suggest that validation of doubles at the 99% level by this method alone is marginal . triples and higher multiplicity candidates are more strongly validatable , enough so that the one dynamically - unstable candidate triple system noted by @xcite , koi-284 , which has a pair of candidates with a period ratio @xmath26 , should be viewed as somewhat surprising ( but see section 2.4 ) . it is of interest to compare the ( low ) false positive rates for multis estimated in the previous paragraph with the presumed fp rates for singles upon which their calculations are based . for 50% fps in singles , our estimates above correspond to 2% fps in doubles ( compare the first numbers at the end of equations 2 and 4 with the 230 candidates in _ kepler _ candidate 2-planet systems ) and 0.4% fps for targets with three or more candidates ( compare the first numbers at the end equations 3 and 57 with the 178 candidates in _ kepler _ candidate 3 or more planet systems ) ; for 10% fps in singles , we estimate 0.4% fps in doubles ( compare the final numbers at the end of equations 2 and 4 with the 230 candidates in _ kepler _ candidate 2-planet systems ) and 0.1% for targets with three or more candidates ( compare the final numbers at the end equations 3 and 57 with the 178 candidates in _ kepler _ candidate 3 or more planet systems ) . these values are consistent with a `` multiplicity boost '' in the bayesian prior for planets of @xmath1 25 for a system with one additional candidate and of @xmath1 100 for a system with more than one additional candidate . the probability that a target hosts a planet candidate , 1/150 , can be compared to the probability of a target that hosts one candidate hosts another , 1/6 , and that an additional candidate has been found for higher multiplicity systems , 1/3 . these latter values , together with the assumption that fps and true planets are uncorrelated , lead to an estimate of the multiplicity boost for candidate doubles of 30 , slightly larger than the value of 25 computed above , and to a somewhat reduced estimate of @xmath1 50 for candidates in systems of higher multiplicity . the multiplicity boost introduced in the previous paragraph can be used to quantify the increased probability that a set of transit - like signatures represent a real transiting planet if one or more additional set of transit - like signatures are detected for the same _ kepler _ target ; i.e. , to compute an estimate the probability of a particular candidate in a multiple candidate system being a true planet from an estimate of that candidate being a planet that does not account for multiplicity . we denote the probability of planethood of the candidate in question computed without factoring in multiplicity by @xmath27 and the probability of it being a planet accounting for multiplicity by @xmath28 if it is in a two candidate system and by @xmath29 if it is a member of a three or more candidate system . in our formulation , multiplicity effectively increases the bayesian estimate of the planet prior but leaves the fp prior unchanged . thus the probability of the planet interpretation accounting for multiplicity is related to that neglecting multiplicity according to the following approximate formulae : @xmath30 @xmath31 where in each case we use the smaller value computed in the previous paragraph . rough estimates for the planet probabilities of individual _ kepler _ candidate multis can be obtained by applying expressions ( 8) and ( 9 ) to the estimates of planet probability by @xcite ; the @xcite planet probabilities are given by @xmath27 in the above formulae since their numbers do not account for multiplicity . note that this multiplicity boost incorporates self - consistently both the coplanarity boost discussed in @xcite and the systems boost ( that planets tend to come in systems ) without need to disentangle these effects . the above calculations of the multiplicity boost do not assume that any of the candidates of the target under consideration have been confirmed or validated as planets . does validating one or more candidate as a true planet(s ) substantially increase the probability that other candidates of the same target are also planets ? for realistic estimates of fp rates ( e.g. , 10% ) , the equations above show that most fps in multis are likely to be combinations of 1 fp with one or more true planets , so validating one candidate does not substantially increase confidence in the others from a statistical viewpoint . nonetheless , validating one candidate does eliminate some of the non - statistical issues raised in the following three subsections . in particular , if that validated candidate is shown to not only be a planet but also to orbit the _ kepler _ target star , then the probability that the other candidates are physically - associated with the target increases . to examine the validity of the three assumptions stated above , we divide fps into two classes , ( i ) chance - alignment blends such as background eclipsing binaries ( bgebs ) and ( ii ) physical triple stars ( pts ) , where grazing eclipses of the target star by a stellar companion are considered together with pts for this purpose . we note that it is a matter of choice how to count cases where the transit signal is produced by a planet transiting a star other than the _ kepler _ target . larger planets transiting stars that are not physically associated with the star providing most of the target s flux can be considered to fall within the chance - alignment blends / bgeb class of fps ( as they must be for _ kepler _ s statistical census of planets , because background stars are not in the denominator of the ratio taken to calculate the fraction of stars with planets , so their planets must not be included in the numerator ) , or alternatively not be regarded as fps when assessing individual candidates and the reliability of the sample . planets transiting physical companions to the star providing most of the flux can either be viewed as members of the pt class of fps or not classified as fps ; how these planets are categorized for _ kepler _ s statistical census of planets is also a matter of choice . assumptions ( i ) and ( ii ) lead to the following caveats : ( i ) : the expected number of bgebs ( chance - alignment blends ) that can cause fps varies with the magnitude and galactic latitude of the target star , whereas those of pts do not ( except to the extent that the distribution of stellar types among _ kepler _ targets depends somewhat on magnitude ) . the variations in expected bgebs act to increase the expected total number of systems with 2 or more fps compared to the value given by the above formulae . when looking at individual candidate systems , the fp probability of those around faint targets and at low galactic latitude is larger , whereas the planetary interpretation becomes more likely for brighter targets and those at higher galactic latitude . however , the distributions in galactic latitude of the planet candidates and of the multiple candidate systems both track that of all _ kepler _ targets , whereas the distribution of expected bgeb fps is quite different ( figure 1 ) ; this suggests that the fraction of candidates ( both singles and multis ) that are produced by bgebs is small . binomial variation ) of each of the planet candidate curves at quartile points in their distributions . the basic shape of the three solid curves is governed by the orientation of the _ kepler _ field on the sky , where the amount of area covered increases from a point at galactic latitude @xmath32 to a region spanning @xmath33 in longitude at @xmath34 in galactic latitude and then decreases to a point at @xmath35 latitude ; the second most important factor is a weighting towards the galactic plane because of the higher spatial density of target stars in that portion of the field . the dashed curve is more heavily weighted towards the galactic plane because , to first approximation , it is weighted quadratically in the spatial density of stars ( more precisely , the product of the spatial densities of target stars and background stars ) , whereas the other curves are only weighted linearly . the spatial density of background stars drops by a factor of 17 from the lowest latitude _ kepler _ observes to the highest latitude . the similarity of curves for targets , planets and multis , and the difference of these from the curve estimating bgeb fps , suggests that the fraction of candidates that are produced by bgebs ( as well as that resulting from planets transiting background stars ) is small . ] the statistical analysis that we presented above does not discriminate between multiple candidates resulting from multiple planets orbiting a background star and a single candidate resulting from a single planet orbiting a background star . however , the correlations and lack thereof between the curves shown in figure 1 also imply that the fraction of kois caused by single or multiple planets transiting a background star is small . in some cases , it is especially unlikely that a multiple candidate system is produced by several planets orbiting a background star , either because its largest member would be greater than planetary in size , or because the requirement of dynamical stability would imply implausibly small densities for the larger planets orbiting the fainter star . additionally , as the fraction of giant planets among the multis is smaller than it is for the singles @xcite , the probability of a multi being a system of larger planets orbiting a fainter star is less than that of a single candidate orbiting a star fainter than the target . a second class of multiple fps can be produced from a single physical system , either a triple star with two sets of eclipses or a background star with multiple transiting planets . triple star systems are unstable for small period ratios and produce large eclipse timing variations for moderate period ratios , so if large timing variations are not detected , we do not need to consider triple star system fps ( nor grazing eclipsing binary stars with a transiting planet ) unless period ratios are large . quadruple star systems consisting of two pairs of eclipsing binaries ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) could produce a small excess probability of a pair of fps . such systems , as well as line of sight pairs of physically - unrelated ebs , also might be more likely to mimic planetary - depth transits because of mutual dilution of the fraction of light in the _ kepler _ aperture . we note also that fps are inherently more likely among both small ( earth - size and smaller ) and large ( jupiter - size and larger ) candidates than among intermediate ( neptune - size ) candidates , independent of multiplicity . most small candidates produce low - amplitude transits that reduce our ability to remove false positives from the candidate list on the basis of the shape of the lightcurve or from differences in the centroid of the location of the dip relative to that of the target . small candidates , including multis , are more likely to be planets orbiting stars fainter than the target simply because the neptune - size planets that could produce such signals are far more common according to _ kepler _ observations than are giant planets @xcite , and this difference in abundance is even larger for the multis than for the singles @xcite . at the other extreme of the planet size distribution , giant candidates appear to be more contaminated by stellar false positives @xcite of the type which plague ground - based surveys than do neptune - size candidates . ( ii ) : planets and fps of both types are more easily detectable for quieter targets ; planets and pts are more detectable for brighter targets , but bgebs that are bright enough to mimic observable transits of the target star are more likely for fainter targets . a grazing eclipsing binary with a circumstellar or circumbinary transiting planet analogous to kepler-16 @xcite would violate our assumption of a lack of correlation between planets and fps , but such a configuration requires a large period ratio for stability and an even larger period ratio for the planet to have modest ttvs . the assumption of no correlation between planets and fps would be violated if the orientations of orbital planes of pts with one star having a planet are not random . alignments of planetary orbital planes for binary stars for which both stars possess planets also violate this assumption , although members of this class are true planets that are all physically associated ( albeit less directly ) with the target star and thus would for many purposes not be classified as fps . the numbers quoted in equations ( 29 ) do not incorporate the caveats noted in this subsection . correlations between the propensity of a target to have one or more fps and to host one or more identified true planets ( ii ) are likely to be at most a factor of a few . false positives of the bgeb class are likely to be concentrated among faint target stars that are located at low galactic latitude @xcite ; this concentration increases the expected number of targets with two ( or more ) fps , but also points to a substantial portion of _ kepler _ s target list whose members have _ a priori _ fp likelihood that is lower than or comparable to those given by the numbers above . the distribution of candidate period ratios exhibits spikes near strong mean motion resonances , which implies that candidates with such period ratios are more likely to be true planets than those candidates not in or very near such resonances @xcite . this clustering can be used to increase confidence in candidates with periods near resonances ; such a `` near - resonance boost '' can be quantified using the measured values of the normalized distance from resonance computed from the distribution of planet period ratios in @xcite . candidate resonant planets can , however , arise from period aliases in analysis of light curves ; such aliases are not of the form of the astrophysical fps considered in this paper , and we note that special care to search for them is an important aspect of validating candidate resonant planets ( see the discussion of koi-730 and the note added in proof in @xcite ) . resonant period ratios increase confidence in various candidates , and as mentioned at the beginning of section 2.1 , one of the candidate systems , koi-284 , is highly suspect because two of the candidates have periods that differ from one another by @xmath36 , which would rapidly lead to a dynamical instability on a very short time scale ( but see the discussion of this system in section 2.4 ) . do non - resonant periods reduce the confidence in individual multis and do stable systems produce an increase in our confidence ? the answers to both parts of this question are yes , but in most cases these effects are minor . while resonances are overpopulated , a substantial majority of multis are not in nor near such resonances @xcite . and while drawing planetary periods randomly from the observed ensemble of transiting planet periods gives many more nominally unstable systems than are observed , the fraction of unstable configurations from such a random draw is still small . nonetheless , in high - multiplicity densely - packed systems , wherein most configurations with the same number of planets randomly spread over the same range in period would likely be unstable , the boost in confidence from stability can be significant . note that special period ratio boosts and stability boosts are in addition to the standard multiplicity boost , i.e. , they can be applied together as two multiplicative factors in the planet prior for appropriate systems . a very rough estimate of the expected number of multiple candidate systems that orbit different members of a binary / multiple star system ( rather than a single system of planets orbiting the same star ) can be made by assuming that half of _ kepler _ s targets are binaries , that each star within a binary is as likely to host both single and multiple transiting planets as are single stars , and that the probability of one star within a binary hosting transiting planets is uncorrelated with that of its binary companion . these assumptions imply @xmath10 planets spread around @xmath37 stars , and thus @xmath38 planets per star and @xmath39 cases in which multis are composed of planets transiting differing members of a stellar binary . positive correlations between the propensity of stars in a binary to have transiting planets ( resulting from the abundance of planets and/or alignment of orbital planes ) would increase this number , but the fact that a significant majority of binaries are composed of stars of substantially differing surface brightness combined with the paucity of giant planets transiting low luminosity stars should reduce the number of multis comprised of two planetary systems because of the difficulty of detecting planets around secondary stars . as mentioned above , koi-284 , with three planetary candidates having periods of 6.18 , 6.42 , 18.0 days and nominal sizes of @xmath1 2 r@xmath40 ( earth radii ) , is the only one of 170 multi - candidate system identified in @xcite that would be clearly dynamically unstable if all of the planets orbited the same star @xcite 0.0012 days . the revised period places the planets much farther apart , and the system is stable with the updated parameters . ] . analysis of a mcdonald observatory spectrum of this bright ( _ kepler _ magnitude @xmath41 ) target yields a temperature of @xmath1 6250 k and log@xmath42 , which suggest a f7v star that is twice as luminous as the sun . speckle images of koi-284 obtained on 24 june 2010 revealed two stars differing in brightness by less than one magnitude and separated from one another by slightly less than 1@xmath43 @xcite . spectroscopic observations of each individual star obtained at keck in 2011 show the two stars to have nearly identical spectra and have a difference in radial velocity of 0.94 @xmath44 0.1 km / s . the nearly identical velocities are consistent with their being gravitationally bound . their separation of @xmath45 at a distance of roughly 500 pc implies a projected separation of 450 au ; the relative orbital velocities for two 1 @xmath46 stars on a circular orbit with semimajor axis @xmath47 = 450 au is 2 km / s . these observations suggest that the three candidates may well all be transiting planets in the same stellar system , with one of the stars hosting one of the six day period planets and the other two planets orbiting the other star in the binary . thus , this system would not call into question the statistical arguments presented in section 2.1 . a detailed analysis of both _ kepler _ and ground - based data to test this hypothesis and elucidate particulars is currently underway @xcite . the numbers derived in section 2 suggest that the sample of multi - planet candidates identified by @xcite is likely to include only a small fraction of false positives , of order 1% . but because of the uncertainties associated with the caveats discussed in section 2 , as well as any factors that we may have omitted , we do not consider it appropriate to view all of _ kepler _ s multi - planet candidates to be validated planets at the 99% level . nonetheless , it is possible to identify candidates with various favorable characteristics as detailed below , and to examine the available data for systems individually for signs of potential inconsistencies with the planet hypothesis . see @xcite for a more detailed discussion of transit characteristics . the shape and duration of a candidate transit can be used to distinguish events produced by planets from false positives produced by known astrophysical sources . the blender code @xcite compares the observed lightcurve to synthetic lightcurves of both a planet transiting the target star and a vast array of possible astrophysical false positives involving binary stars and larger planets transiting fainter stars . if the planet hypothesis does not provide an acceptable fit to the data , the candidate is not viable ; candidates for which the planet fit is marginal are called into question , and such candidates are not considered further herein . astrophysical false positives are considered credible if they provide an acceptable fit ( 3@xmath48 ) to the data . then the _ a priori _ likelihoods of the planet hypothesis and that of a false positive are compared , and a probability that the apparent transit is caused by a blend is computed . the process can be very involved , especially for candidates with orbital periods long enough that astrophysical false positives could plausibly be produced by objects with eccentric ( not tidally - damped ) orbits @xcite . true planetary transits of the star that is the dominant source of light in the aperture are wavelength - independent ( neglecting the small effects of stellar limb - darkening and contamination by flux from other stars in the aperture ) , whereas false positives are not ( except in the unlikely case that the effective temperatures of the contributing stars are similar ) . by providing infrared time series spanning times of transit , the warm spitzer mission can assist in the validation of many transiting planet systems . several candidates in multiple systems have been observed , and they all exhibit achromatic transit depths , consistent with planetary signals @xcite . the durations of transit - like signatures can be used to assess the probability of the planetary interpretation , especially when more than one planet candidate is present for a given target . transit and eclipse durations depend on several factors , including the masses and radii of the two objects , the impact parameter , @xmath49 , which is defined as the minimum projected separation between the center of the smaller body ( planet in the case of a planetary transit ) and that of the larger body ( star ) measured in units of the radius of the larger body , and the period and eccentricity of the orbit . central transits ( those for which the center of the transiting body passes over the center of the transited body ) by a planet on a circular orbit have durations that vary as the cube root of the orbital period @xcite and inversely to the cube root of the stellar density @xcite ; these relationships hold for fps as long as the bright star is substantially larger and more massive than the other body . when the system s mass is dominated by the primary but the radius of the secondary can not be ignored , then the duration , @xmath50 , ( 1@xmath51 contact 4@xmath52 contact , which corresponds to the values reported in @xcite and in table 3 of this paper ) , of a central transit for a circular orbit satisfies the following proportionality relationship : @xmath53 if the transit duration is measured over the time interval when the center of the planet covers the disk of the star , the first factor on the right - hand side of expression ( 10 ) is no longer relevant and the proportionality is simply to @xmath54 . note that the orbital period , @xmath55 , is very accurately measured by _ kepler _ , as is the ratio of the planet s radius , @xmath56 , to that of the star , @xmath57 , provided dilution by nearby stars is small . planetary transits with an impact parameter smaller than half the star s radius have a duration that exceeds @xmath58 that of a central transit . such transits account for almost half of all transiting planets , and over half of the transits observed to a specified snr threshold . the fraction of transits with durations greater than half that of a central transit is @xmath59 ; again specifying a snr threshold increases the observed fraction . orbital eccentricities also influence the durations of transits and fps ; in most cases , durations are reduced because speeds are highest near periastron @xcite , where geometric considerations imply that transit probabilities are larger . there are two primary purposes of this work : demonstrating the very high credibility of the ensemble of _ kepler _ multi - planet candidates and providing a framework to validate particular systems of candidates as planets . we now turn to a specific system that is both intrinsically interesting because it is the closest analog to kepler-11 observed to date @xcite and has characteristics very favorable for validation by multiplicity . koi-707 ( kic 9458613 ) is a @xmath60 star for which four planet candidates , ranging in period from 13 to 41 days , were announced by @xcite ; a fifth candidate planet , with shorter orbital period and smaller size , has subsequently been identified . the lightcurve of this target is shown in figure 2 . we performed an analysis of pixel - level _ kepler _ spacecraft data that shows that the transit signals come from a location on the sky that is coincident with that of the target star within small uncertainty , and we obtained high - resolution images of the target that did not show any nearby stars capable of producing the transit signals ; these studies are presented in section 4.1 . our analyses of the transit lightcurves and spectra taken of the target star are presented in section 4.2 . in section 4.3 , we review the characteristics of this system that allow for its validation by multiplicity . we discuss the properties of the kepler-33 planetary system in section 4.4 . a seeing - limited image taken at lick shows a star @xmath61 to the nw that is 4.5 magnitudes fainter than koi-707 , but no stars closer to the target . on 12 june 2011 , koi-707 was imaged in the 880 nm filter ( @xmath62 = 50 nm ) of our speckle camera at the wiyn 3.5-m telescope located on kitt peak . this star showed no companions within a 2.8 @xmath63 2.8 arcsec region down to 3.1 magnitudes fainter than the target star ; stars within @xmath64 of the target star would not have been detected . details of this speckle imaging data collection and reduction precesses are fully described in @xcite . we check to see whether the transit signal is due to a source other than koi-707 using the difference image technique described in @xcite . this method fits the measured _ kepler _ pixel response function ( prf ) to a difference image formed from the average in - transit and average out - of - transit pixel images in order to calculate the position of the difference image centroid . this difference image centroid position is compared with the position of the prf - fit centroid of the average out - of - transit image , as well as to the predicted deviations in centroid locations due to scene crowding . the results for all 5 planet candidates are presented in table 1 and shown in figure 3 . uncertainty in the offset distance . the robust average of each modeled quarterly offsets is shown as a thick gray cross , with the gray dashed circle showing the average model 3@xmath48 offset distance uncertainty . when the circle showing the observed 3@xmath48 uncertainty in the difference image has significant intersection with the dashed circle showing the modeled 3@xmath48 uncertainty in the position of the target star , the data are consistent with the observed transit signal being on koi-707 . , title="fig : " ] uncertainty in the offset distance . the robust average of each modeled quarterly offsets is shown as a thick gray cross , with the gray dashed circle showing the average model 3@xmath48 offset distance uncertainty . when the circle showing the observed 3@xmath48 uncertainty in the difference image has significant intersection with the dashed circle showing the modeled 3@xmath48 uncertainty in the position of the target star , the data are consistent with the observed transit signal being on koi-707 . , title="fig : " ] + uncertainty in the offset distance . the robust average of each modeled quarterly offsets is shown as a thick gray cross , with the gray dashed circle showing the average model 3@xmath48 offset distance uncertainty . when the circle showing the observed 3@xmath48 uncertainty in the difference image has significant intersection with the dashed circle showing the modeled 3@xmath48 uncertainty in the position of the target star , the data are consistent with the observed transit signal being on koi-707 . , title="fig : " ] uncertainty in the offset distance . the robust average of each modeled quarterly offsets is shown as a thick gray cross , with the gray dashed circle showing the average model 3@xmath48 offset distance uncertainty . when the circle showing the observed 3@xmath48 uncertainty in the difference image has significant intersection with the dashed circle showing the modeled 3@xmath48 uncertainty in the position of the target star , the data are consistent with the observed transit signal being on koi-707 . , title="fig : " ] + uncertainty in the offset distance . the robust average of each modeled quarterly offsets is shown as a thick gray cross , with the gray dashed circle showing the average model 3@xmath48 offset distance uncertainty . when the circle showing the observed 3@xmath48 uncertainty in the difference image has significant intersection with the dashed circle showing the modeled 3@xmath48 uncertainty in the position of the target star , the data are consistent with the observed transit signal being on koi-707 . , title="fig : " ] the uncertainty in the quarterly centroid locations displayed in figure 3 is based upon propagating pixel - level uncertainty and does not include possible prf fit bias . sources of prf fit bias include scene crowding , because the fit is of a single prf that assumes a single star , and prf error . the centroid offset is the difference between the positions of the centroids of the difference image and out - of - transit images , so common biases such as prf error should approximately cancel . there is , however , a quarter - dependent residual bias . statistical analysis across many uncrowded _ kepler _ targets indicates that the residual bias due to prf error is zero - mean , so we average the quarterly centroid positions . specifically , we compute a robust @xmath65 minimizing best - fit position to the quarterly position data . the uncertainties of the average are estimated by taking the uncertainties of the fit and performing a bootstrap analysis . this average for each planet candidate is shown on figure 3 . bias due to crowding ( stars close enough to the target that they contribute light observed in the aperture ) , however , does not cancel because , to the extent that variations in other field stars are not correlated with transits , field stars do not contribute to the difference image . this introduces a systematic bias component that remains in the average over quarters . to investigate the possibility that the observed offsets are due to crowding bias , we model the local scene using stars from the kic and the measured prf , induced the transit on koi-707 with the ephemeris of each planet candidate , and performed the same prf fit analysis on the model difference and out - of - transit images as that performed on the pixel data . if the resulting modeled average offset matches the observed average offset , then the observed offset can be explained by crowding bias . the locations of the transit signatures ( difference image centroids ) of each of koi-707 s five planet candidates lie within @xmath66 of the predicted position , and given the uncertainties listed in table 1 , none of the signatures are significantly offset and all are fully consistent with transits on the target star . furthermore , the lack of near neighbor stars seen in the speckle image rules out some of the possible false positive scenarios that could produce a centroid shift of the magnitude suggested by the marginally significant offset observed . we obtained a spectrum of the target star koi-707/kepler-33 using the hires spectrometer at keck i 10-m telescope . classification of this spectrum using sme ( spectroscopy made easy , @xcite ) yields the stellar parameter values shown in table 2 ( the final two columns in this table show results from constrained fits described at the end of this subsection ) . the mean stellar density based on spectroscopic information was estimated by matching the determined distributions of @xmath67 and [ fe / h ] to the yonsei - yale evolution tracks . this allowed the determination of stellar mass and radius and mean stellar density posterior distribution based on spectroscopy . the spectrum of koi-707 is consistent with two sets of stellar evolution tracks ( figure 4 ) , leading to double - peaked probability distributions and asymmetric uncertainties in several stellar parameters . we plot the probability distributions of the fundamental parameters of stellar mass and age in figure 5 and those of the stellar density , which is a key input to transit fitting , in figure 6 , and we include in table 2 various measures of uncertainty beyond the simple standard deviation for the values of various derived stellar parameters that are either critical to the validation and properties of koi-707 and/or distributed highly asymmetrically . note that both solutions are somewhat above the main sequence , implying an evolved star . ( red ) , 1.2 m@xmath68 ( green ) , 1.3 m@xmath68 ( blue ) , 1.4 m@xmath68 ( cyan ) and 1.5 m@xmath68 ( magenta ) stars with [ fe / h ] = 0.15 . ages , in gyr , are marked along the tracks . note the uneven rates of evolution along these tracks . the gray dotted tracks are spaced by 0.01 m@xmath68 in stellar mass and 0.02 gyr in time to illustrate the distribution of field stars on the @xmath69 plane ; the apparent gaps / discontinuities in these tracks are caused by rapid changes at various stages of stellar evolution . the three boxes mark the 1 , 2 and 3 @xmath48 confidence regions of the spectroscopic sme analysis of the spectrum of koi-707 taken at keck . there are degeneracies in determining a unique stellar mass and radius for specified values of @xmath70 and @xmath71 . for example , a 4.4 gyr , 1.3 m@xmath68 model and a 5.5 gyr , 1.2 m@xmath68 model have nearly identical @xmath70 and @xmath71 . the low - mass / old peaks in the probability distribution functions shown in figure 5 result from the pile - up of stellar evolution tracks as core h is exhausted in the transition regime from radiative cores of 1.1 m@xmath68 and smaller stars to convective cores in 1.2 m@xmath68 and larger stars . the high - mass / young peaks result from the overlap between tracks for the early shell h burning phase of stars with convective cores with tracks for the late core h burning phase of stars that are @xmath72 more massive . ] as an independent check of the values of the sme parameters , we also derived values by matching the spectrum to synthetic spectra @xcite , and in addition we employ a new fitting scheme ( stellar parameter classification , spc ) that is currently under development and being readied for publication , allowing us to extract precise stellar parameters from the spectra . the spc analysis yielded the following parameters : @xmath73 k , @xmath74 , [ m / h]=@xmath75 km / s , rv = @xmath76 km / s . the sme and spc parameters are fully consistent , and the nominal value of the key parameter @xmath71 from spc is slightly ( @xmath77 ) larger than the sme value . in contrast , the derived stellar radius from sme is @xmath78 , substantially larger ( more than @xmath79 formal error , see table 2 ) than the radius estimate of 1.29 r@xmath68 based upon the kic that was used by used by @xcite . we measured the radial velocity of koi-707 relative to the barycenter of our solar system . the method involves measuring the doppler shift of the stellar spectrum obtained with the keck i telescope and hires spectrometer on bjd = 2455782.9441 relative to the solar spectrum by a @xmath65 fit of the two spectra . to set the zero point of the wavelength scale accurately , we measure the displacement of telluric lines from the earth s atmosphere , serving as the iodine cell " . the resulting radial velocities are accurate to 0.1 km / s , based on measurements of 2000 stars @xcite and comparison with iau standard stars . for koi-707 , the radial velocity is @xmath80 = 14.09 km / s , indicating motion of the star away from the solar system at a speed typical of the velocity dispersion of stars in the galactic disk . orbital periods of the planets quoted in table 3 are as perceived from the barycenter of our solar system . as the kepler-33 system is receding from us at @xmath81 , where @xmath82 represents the speed of light , the actual orbital periods in the rest frame of the kepler-33 system are 0.999953 times as large as the tabulated values . we used q1-q8 long - cadence _ kepler _ aperture photometry ( i.e. , only pixel - level corrections such as bias and dark smear are applied to the data and there is no co - detrending ) . at this level of data reduction , there are still instrumental artifacts on timescales similar to the planetary orbits . to detrend the data ( remove long - period variations ) , a second - order polynomial was fitted to segments of sequential _ kepler _ photometry data outside of transits ( i.e. , in - transit observations were given zero weight ) , and then this polynomial was subtracted from the data . a segment is defined as a length of data that is uninterrupted for 5 or more consecutive long cadences ( @xmath12.5 hours ) . each segment is then combined to produce a final time series that is then normalized by the median . we adopt a simple model to fit the data . we fit for the mean stellar density ( @xmath83 ) , and each planet s orbital period ( @xmath55 ) , transit epoch ( @xmath84 ) , scaled planetary radius ( @xmath85 ) and impact parameter ( @xmath49 ) . the planets are assumed to be on circular orbits ; planet - planet interactions are implicitly accounted for by allowing the center of transit time to vary in order to best - fit transit shape ( minimization of scatter on residuals ) . the transit was described with the analytic formulae of @xcite , and we adopted a non - linear limb darkening law with coefficients fixed based on the @xcite tabulation for the _ kepler _ band with stellar parameters from sme analysis . a best fit model was computed using a levenberg - marquardt algorithm to minimize the @xmath65 statistic and initial uncertainties were estimated via the construction of a co - variance matrix . the best fit model and co - variances were used to seed a hybrid - mcmc ( markov chain monte - carlo ) algorithm to determine posterior distributions of our model parameters . the model is considered hybrid , as we randomly use a gibbs - sampler and a buffer of previous chain parameters to produce proposals to jump to a new location in the parameter space . the addition of the buffer allows for a calculation of vectorized jumps that allow for efficient sampling of highly correlated parameter space . a direct comparison of the mean stellar density determined by the circular transit - model ( 0.236 @xmath44 0.080 ) and the mean stellar density determined from spectroscopy ( 0.301 @xmath44 0.067 ) differ by less than 1@xmath48 . this shows that we can produce a self - consistent circular model in which all five planets orbit the same star and produce stellar parameters that agree with spectroscopy . close - ups of the lightcurves of each of the planets near planetary transit are shown in figure 7 . transit durations of all five kois vary in proportion to the @xmath54 to within 5% , and to within 3% when planet sizes are factored in as specified in expression ( 10 ) . the remarkable similarity of these transit durations when appropriately scaled to orbital periods is apparent in figure 8 , which shows the same data as figure 7 but with the time coordinate scaled by @xmath54 . such similarity would be the consequence of an ensemble of planets transiting the same star on low eccentricity orbits with similar impact parameters . the impact parameters given in table 3 are indeed quite similar for all of the planets . but the inclinations implied to produce these parameters require a very fortuitous arrangement in which tilt to the line of sight is just enough larger in the inner planets than the outer ones . in contrast , if the system is viewed nearly edge on , i.e. , @xmath86 , then both a wider range of impact parameters would be allowed ( because transit durations are less sensitive to the precise value of @xmath49 when @xmath87 ) and similar values of @xmath49 imply a very flat system rather than a fortuitous ensemble of tilts . of the planet in question . vertical lines mark the beginning and end times for each transit . for planets on circular orbits with the same impact parameter , durations normalized in this manner should be the same for all planets . the remarkable similarity in normalized durations of these planets is very strong evidence that they all orbit the same star . ] we are thus motivated to perform a second set of fits constrained by the assumptions of circular orbits for all planets and @xmath88 for the planet with the longest normalized ( according to expression 10 ) transit duration , koi-707.01 . two such fits were performed , one for the low mass stellar solution ( where we imposed the constraint @xmath89 ) and the other for the high mass ( @xmath90 ) solution . we show in the far right columns of tables 2 and 3 both the high and low stellar mass `` flat '' fits ; no uncertainties are quoted for these fits because the @xmath88 assumption constrains results so tightly that computed uncertainties are unrealistically low . the fitting procedure that we used to compute the planetary parameters listed in table 3 did not account for the small ( 1 2% ) contribution of the second star in the aperture to the flux measured by _ this dilution implies that the planet radii quoted are overestimated by 0.5 1% , a difference far smaller than the uncertainties in their actual values . the five planetary candidates of koi-707 are extremely likely to represent a true 5 planet system orbiting the target star . there are several lines of evidence that support this conclusion . first , the analysis presented in section 2 implies that the overwhelming majority of _ kepler _ multiple - planet candidates are true planets and bound within the same physical system . second , the planetary system is already closely - packed dynamically for the sizes of planets around an undiluted target star ( see section 4.4 ) . were the planetary system to orbit another star that is not seen because it is significantly fainter than the target , the larger planets required to match the observations would necessitate implausibly low densities for the planetary system to be stable . third , the spatial location analysis presented in section 4.1 , combined with the galactic latitude distribution of targets and planet candidates shown in figure 1 and the relatively high galactic latitude of koi-707 ( 15@xmath91 ) , together imply that it is unlikely that the signals are due to a source not physically associated with the target star . fourth , the long durations of the transits relative to the planets orbital periods imply that they are produced by light being blocked from a star whose density is significantly less than those of cool dwarfs , and/or they are produced by apocentric transits of objects with substantial orbital eccentricity . substantial orbital eccentricities would make the system unstable if the planets orbited the same star . it is highly implausible that two stars in an unresolved stellar binary would be so similarly coeval to have nearly equal densities characteristic of a somewhat evolved star . fifth , the remarkable similarity of the transit durations when appropriately scaled to orbital periods ( expression ( 10 ) and figure 8) can be understood as the consequence of an ensemble of planets transiting the same star with similar impact parameters , but would otherwise be an unlikely coincidence . the above characteristics of koi-707.0105 , combined with the overall high validity of _ kepler _ multis , imply that these candidates have a well above 99% probability of composing a true multi - planet system , hence we consider these candidates to be validated planets and name the system kepler-33 . numerical integrations to test stability of the system were performed using masses of the planets from the nominal mass - radius relationship based upon planets within our solar system presented in @xcite . this relationship is given by : @xmath92 where r@xmath40 and m@xmath40 are the radius and mass of the earth , respectively . in previous work , @xcite integrated the koi-707 system using parameters based on the data presented by @xcite and assuming planar initially circular orbits ; the model system survived intact for the entire @xmath93 years simulated . all of our integrations also assume that the system is planar . for all planets having zero initial eccentricity , all three models of the system listed in tables 2 and 3 survived intact for the entire @xmath94 years simulated . of the three kepler-33 planetary system models that we integrated , the one based directly on the spectroscopic stellar parameters had the largest planetary sizes and thus largest estimated planetary masses , with the fractional differences in estimated planetary masses from one model to another being larger than those for stellar mass . thus , the spectroscopic parameters yielded the largest interplanetary perturbations , and presumably the largest ttv signatures . we examined distributions of ttv signals over 2 year periods during the first 2 myr of this simulation . these theoretical ttvs for the inner planet were smaller than 30 seconds , and those for kepler-33c less than 90 seconds , both values below current measurement capabilities . the outer three planets exhibited far larger ttvs , 9 18 minutes for kepler-33d , 23 38 minutes for kepler-33e and 23 35 minutes for kepler-33f , roughly consistent with variations detected . while this model used relatively high mass estimates , the integration began with circular orbits , which produce smaller ttvs , so the results do not yield a preference between the three models of planetary sizes listed in table 3 . a detailed analysis of planetary ttvs is beyond the scope of this paper , but we note that it may well soon be possible to derive estimates of the masses of some or all of the outer three planets using observed ttvs . the properties of the 5 planet kepler-33 system are analogous to those of the 6 planet kepler-11 system @xcite . both systems include 4 planets with orbital periods between 13 and 47 days that are comparable in radius to , or somewhat smaller in size than , neptune , as well as a smaller planet closer to the star . both systems are thus very closely - packed in a dynamical sense . the kepler-11 system is slightly more dynamically close - packed than is the kepler-33 system , both in the sense that the ratios of the orbital periods of neighboring planets are a bit larger for kepler-33 s planets @xcite and as evidenced from smaller ttvs detected in the kepler-33 system . in some aspects , the kepler-33 system can be viewed as a less extreme cousin of kepler-11 , with 5 known transiting planets rather than 6 and spacing that not quite as close , yet dynamically much tighter than most systems @xcite . however , the new system s inner planet , kepler-33b , is smaller and closer to its star than is its counterpart , kepler-11b . the high density of kepler-11b relative to its brethren , coupled with its smaller size , indicates a composition richer in heavy elements @xcite . while the mass and thus the density of kepler-33b is not known , it is unlikely that a planet this small ( @xmath95 ) and close ( 0.07 au ) to its bright star ( 3 l@xmath68 ) could have retained a substantial h / he atmosphere . this lends support to the suggestion by @xcite that planets such as kepler-11b may have once had atmospheres of light gases that subsequently escaped as a result of stellar irradiation . the slightly shorter normalized duration of the small inner planet kepler-33b suggests that this planet has somewhat larger inclination and/or eccentricity than do the outer four planets . we note that mercury , the innermost and smallest planet in our solar system , also has the largest eccentricity and inclination of the 8 planets known to orbit our sun . stability of the kepler-33 planetary system excludes large eccentricities of the four outer planets , although interplanetary perturbations must cause eccentricities to be non - zero . the remarkable similarity in the normalized transit durations of the five planets orbiting kepler-33 would be very unlikely if the eccentricities and inclinations of planetary orbits are significant ( figure 9 ) . moreover , the consequent similarity in computed impact parameters despite the planets differing orbital distances requires that either the system is viewed near edge - on , with impact parameters @xmath96 , or a very fortuitous coincidence producing an anticorrelation between inclinations and orbital periods . we view such a coincidence as unlikely , and therefore prefer the planetary parameters closer to those listed in final two columns of tables 2 and 3 ( the `` flat '' fits ) than to those listed in the second column of tables 2 and 3 . case . the blue triangles , yellow diamonds and red squares show results from simulations in which the eccentricity assigned to each planet was drawn form a rayleigh distribution with mean value @xmath97 , @xmath98 and @xmath99 , respectively . the addition of even a small range of eccentricities greatly reduces probability of highly correlated transit durations . ] the calculations presented in section 2 show that the vast majority of _ kepler _ s multi - planet candidates are indeed planets . the essence of our argument is that fewer than 10@xmath100 of _ kepler _ targets have a planet candidate listed in @xcite . if 10% or fewer of these candidates are fps , then fewer than 10@xmath101 of _ kepler _ targets have a false positive , and if fps are not correlated with other planet candidates , then fewer than 10@xmath102 of _ kepler _ s @xmath1 160,000 targets , i.e. , a total of at most 2 targets , are expected to have a false positive as well as another transit - like signature that makes them a candidate multi - planet system . this number can be compared to 170 candidate multi - planet systems with a total of 408 planet candidates announced by @xcite . accurate estimates of the false positive rate in this population require detailed analysis of both _ kepler _ and ground - based data to account for the caveats expressed in section 2.2 . nonetheless , we expect that @xmath103 of the 408 planet candidates in multis that were announced by @xcite are indeed exoplanets , although a small fraction of these planets orbit stars other than their nominal _ kepler _ target star . note that the smallest planet candidates are most prone to false positives , because low snr limits the restrictiveness in parameter space of tests of lightcurve shape and location of the centroid of the transit signal on the sky plane , and the abundance of astrophysical signals that are capable of producing lower amplitude events is greater . also note that stellar parameters , and thus planetary sizes , are prone to large uncertainties for candidates that have no high - snr spectroscopic observations from the ground . from a bayesian statistical perspective , multiplicity effectively allows us to increase the planet prior , and thus enables the validation of candidates as being true planets at a specified high probability level without going to the extreme lengths often required to provide a very small upper bound on the fp prior . we use these arguments along with a detailed analysis of _ kepler _ data to validate the kepler-11 analog koi-707 system , which we name kepler-33 . was competitively selected as the tenth discovery mission . funding for this mission is provided by nasa s science mission directorate . the authors thank the many people who gave so generously of their time to make the _ kepler _ mission a success , chief among them bill borucki , who has devoted decades to developing and implementing _ kepler_. useful comments were provided by natalie batalha , ruth murray - clay , dimitar sasselov , jason steffen , and especially by tim brown . kevin zahnle and mark marley provided constructive comments on the manuscript . d. c. f. acknowledges nasa support through hubble fellowship grant # hf-51272.01-a , awarded by stsci , operated by aura under contract nas 5 - 26555 . ccccc .01 & @xmath104 & @xmath105 & @xmath106 & @xmath107 + .02 & @xmath108 & @xmath109 & @xmath110 & @xmath111 + .03 & @xmath112 & @xmath113 & @xmath114 & @xmath115 + .04 & @xmath116 & @xmath117 & @xmath118 & @xmath119 + .05 & @xmath120 & @xmath121 & @xmath122 & @xmath123 + [ tab : centroids ] ccccccccccc spectroscopy + @xmath124 ( m@xmath68 ) & 1.291 & 0.082 & 0.063 & -0.121 & 0.212 & -0.200 & 1.271 & 1.164 + @xmath57 ( r@xmath68 ) & 1.82 & 0.16 & 0.14 & -0.18 & 0.49 & -0.42 & 1.663 & 1.615 + @xmath125 & 0.0250 & 0.0019 & & & & & 0.0248 & 0.0241 + @xmath126 ( k ) & 5904 & 47 & & & & & 5899 & 5880 + log(@xmath127/l@xmath68 ) & 0.556 & 0.080 & & & & & 0.476 & 0.446 + age ( gyr ) & 4.27 & 0.87 & 0.74 & -1.03 & 2.68 & -1.65&4.31 & 5.92 + log@xmath128 ( @xmath129/s ) & 4.027 & 0.056 & & & & & 4.0994 & 4.087 + @xmath80 ( km / s)&14.09&0.1 & & & & & & & + @xmath83 ( g/@xmath130 ) & 0.300 & 0.066 & 0.049 & -0.079 & 0.230 & -0.147 & 0.3883 & 0.3885 + transit model + @xmath83 ( g/@xmath130 ) & 0.288 & 0.081 & 0.091 & -0.066 & 0.112 & -0.215 & 0.03897&0.3897 + ccccccccccc kepler-33b = koi-707.05 + @xmath84 ( bjd-2454900 ) & 64.8981 & 0.0075 & & & & & 64.8973 & 64.8973 + @xmath55 ( days ) & 5.66793 & 0.00012 & & & & & 5.667939 & 5.667939 + @xmath49 & 0.50 & 0.16 & 0.16 & -0.20 & 0.34 & -0.41 & 0.298 & 0.298 + @xmath85 & 0.00877 & 0.00046 & & & & & 0.00853&0.00853 + @xmath56 ( r@xmath40 ) & 1.74 & 0.18 & & & & & 1.549 & 1.504 + @xmath131 ( degrees ) & 86.39 & 1.17 & 0.96 & -1.62 & 2.90 & -3.16 & 88.03 & 88.03 + @xmath132 & 7.87 & 0.87 & & & & & 8.714 & 8.714 + @xmath47 ( au ) & 0.0677 & 0.0014 & & & & & 0.06740 & 0.06544 + tr@xmath133 ( ppm ) & 86.8 & 6.8 & & & & & 87.7 & 87.7 + tr@xmath134 ( hr ) & 4.88 & 0.16 & 0.16 & -0.15 & 0.45 & -0.54 & 4.80 & 4.80 + + kepler-33c = koi-707.04 + @xmath84 ( bjd-2454900 ) & 76.6764 & 0.0042 & & & & & 76.6777 & 76.6777 + @xmath55 ( days ) & 13.17562 & 0.00014 & & & & & 13.17563 & 13.17563 + @xmath49 & 0.44 & 0.17 & 0.17 & -0.21 & 0.38 & -0.38 & 0.144 & 0.144 + @xmath85 & 0.01602 & 0.00057 & & & & & 0.01560 & 0.01560 + @xmath56 ( r@xmath40 ) & 3.20 & 0.30 & & & & & 2.833&2.751 + @xmath131 ( degrees ) & 88.19 & 0.72 & 0.58 & -1.06 & 1.55 & -1.92 & 89.46&89.46 + @xmath132 & 13.8 & 1.5 & & & & & 15.292 & 15.292 + @xmath47 ( au ) & 0.1189 & 0.0025 & & & & & 0.11287 & 0.11484 + tr@xmath133 ( ppm ) & 297.7 & 9.1 & & & & & 299.8 & 299.8 + tr@xmath134 ( hr ) & 6.700 & 0.104 & 0.096 & -0.107 & 0.325 & -0.295&6.616&6.616 + + kepler-33d = koi-707.01 + @xmath84 ( bjd-2454900 ) & 122.6342 & 0.0018 & & & & & 122.6341 & 122.6341 + @xmath55 ( days ) & 21.77596 & 0.00011 & & & & & 21.775984 & 21.7759 + @xmath49 & 0.44 & 0.17 & 0.14 & -0.23 & 0.38 & -0.40 & 0 ( assumed ) & 0 ( assumed ) + @xmath85 & 0.02667 & 0.00087 & & & & & 0.02589 & 0.02589 + @xmath56 ( r@xmath40 ) & 5.35 & 0.49 & & & & & 4.700&4.564 + @xmath131 ( degrees ) & 88.71 & 0.51 & 0.61 & -0.48 & 1.08 & -1.37 & 90 ( assumed ) & 90 ( assumed ) + @xmath132 & 19.3 & 2.1 & & & & & 21.38&21.38 + @xmath47 ( au ) & 0.1662 & 0.0035 & & & & & 0.16533 & 0.16053 + tr@xmath133 ( ppm ) & 831.4 & 10.5 & & & & & 831 & 831 + tr@xmath134 ( hr ) & 8.011 & 0.097 & 0.065 & -0.103 & 0.345 & -0.192 & 7.987 & 7.987 + + kepler-33e = koi-707.03 + @xmath84 ( bjd-2454900 ) & 68.8715 & 0.0048 & & & & & 68.8720 & 68.8720 + @xmath55 ( days ) & 31.78440 & 0.00039 & & & & & 31.78438 & 31.78438 + @xmath49 & 0.47 & 0.16 & 0.14 & -0.21 & 0.38 & -0.37 & 0.204 & 0.204 + @xmath85 & 0.02011 & 0.00072 & & & & & 0.01955 & 0.01955 + @xmath56 ( r@xmath40 ) & 4.02 & 0.38 & & & & & 3.550 & 3.446 + @xmath131 ( degrees ) & 88.94 & 0.37 & 0.45 & -0.35 & 0.84 & -1.07 & 89.576 & 89.576 + @xmath132 & 24.9 & 2.8 & & & & & 27.51 & 27.51 + @xmath47 ( au ) & 0.2138 & 0.0045 & & & & & 0.2127 & 0.20656 + tr@xmath133 ( ppm ) & 467 & 12 & & & & & 469 & 469 + tr@xmath134 ( hr ) & 8.90 & 0.13 & 0.12 & -0.13 & 0.40 & -0.38 & 8.819 & 8.819 + + kepler-33f = koi-707.02 + @xmath84 ( bjd-2454900 ) & 105.5763 & 0.0040 & & & & & 105.5757 & 105.5757 + @xmath55 ( days ) & 41.02902 & 0.00042 & & & & & 41.02903 & 41.02903 + @xmath49 & 0.43 & 0.17 & 0.15 & -0.23 & 0.39 & -0.42 & 0.130 & 0.130 + @xmath85 & 0.02227 & 0.00076 & & & & & 0.02171 & 0.02171 + @xmath56 ( r@xmath40 ) & 4.46 & 0.41 & & & & & 3.941 & 3.827 + @xmath131 ( degrees ) & 89.17 & 0.34 & 0.33 & -0.42 & 0.68 & -0.98 & 89.772 & 89.772 + @xmath132 & 29.5 & 3.3 & & & & & 32.61 & 32.61 + @xmath47 ( au ) & 0.2535 & 0.0054 & & & & & 0.2522 & 0.2449 + tr@xmath133 ( ppm ) & 579 & 12 & & & & & 581 & 581 + tr@xmath134 ( hr ) & 9.87 & 0.13 & 0.11 & -0.15 & 0.43 & -0.36 & 9.732 & 9.732 + Abstract:
[ "we present a statistical analysis that demonstrates that the overwhelming majority of _ kepler _ candidate multiple transiting systems ( multis ) indeed represent true , physically - associated transiting planets . binary stars provide the primary source of false positives among _ kepler _ planet candidates , implying that false positives should be nearly randomly - distributed among _ kepler _ targets . in contrast , true transiting planets would appear clustered around a smaller number of _ kepler _ targets if detectable planets tend to come in systems and/or if the orbital planes of planets encircling the same star are correlated . there are more than one hundred times as many _ kepler _ planet candidates in multi - candidate systems as would be predicted from a random distribution of candidates , implying that the vast majority are true planets . most of these multis are multiple planet systems orbiting the _ kepler _ target star , but there are likely cases where ( a ) the planetary system orbits a fainter star , and the planets are thus significantly larger than has been estimated , or ( b ) the planets orbit different stars within a binary / multiple star system . we use the low overall false positive rate among _ kepler _ multis , together with analysis of _ kepler _ spacecraft and ground - based data , to validate the closely - packed kepler-33 planetary system , which orbits a star that has evolved somewhat off of the main sequence . kepler-33 hosts five transiting planets with periods ranging from 5.67 to 41 days ." ]
12,884
12,884
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the radial instability of the electron - degenerate , chandrasekhar - mass core marks the beginning of the final episode in the life of a massive star with zero - age main - sequence ( zams ) mass in the range @xmath3 . collapse ensues and , once fully dynamical , separates the core into a subsonically homologously contracting inner core and a supersonically collapsing outer core . at nuclear density , the repulsive component of the nuclear force leads to a stiffening of the equation of state ( eos ) . this stabilizes the inner core , which overshoots its new equilibrium , then rebounds into the outer core , launching a strong hydrodynamic shock wave from its edge . this instant in time is referred to as _ core bounce_. the inner core has a mass of @xmath4 at bounce and this material becomes the unshocked core of the protoneutron star . the shock formed at core bounce propagates into the outer core , but the dissociation of nuclei in the accreted material into neutrons and protons and the electron capture on free protons in the region behind the shock ( the _ postshock _ region ) soon sap its might , driving it into submission to the ram pressure of accretion . the shock stalls and turns into a standing accretion shock that must be revived to unbind the stellar envelope and drive a core - collapse supernova explosion . neutrinos play a pivotal and dominant role in stellar collapse and core - collapse supernovae . neutrinos and antineutrinos of all flavors carry away the @xmath5@xmath6 ( @xmath7 ) of gravitational binding energy of the remnant neutron star over tens of seconds after core bounce . aided by multi - dimensional fluid instabilities , they probably deposit , within a few hundred milliseconds after bounce , sufficient energy in the region behind the stalled shock to revive the shock and make typical @xmath5@xmath8 core - collapse supernova explosion ( @xcite and references therein ) . only hyper - energetic ( i.e. , @xmath9 ) explosions may require a different mechanism @xcite , e.g. , rapid rotation combined with strong magnetic fields , which may lead to energetic jet - driven explosions ( e.g. , @xcite ) . for a galactic or near - extragalactic core - collapse supernova , neutrinos offer the unique possibility of directly observing the dynamics and thermodynamic conditions prevalent in the supernova core . together with gravitational waves ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) they will herald the next nearby supernova possibly hours before any telescope sensitive to electromagnetic waves will notice the event . in the probable case that the next galactic supernova occurs in a dust - enshrouded region and/or close or behind the galactic center , the supernova may be impossible to observe in broad bands of the electromagnetic spectrum , making neutrino and gravitational - wave observations even more important . the observation of neutrinos from sn 1987a in the large magellanic cloud @xcite confirmed the basic picture of core collapse and early protoneutron star evolution ( e.g. , @xcite and references therein ) , but the small number and poor timing of the observed interactions did not allow far - reaching and robust conclusions on core - collapse supernova dynamics and the involved neutrino physics , nuclear physics and astrophysics . the situation will be completely different when the neutrino burst from a galactic core - collapse supernova reaches current and near - future neutrino detectors on earth . super - kamiokande @xcite , icecube @xcite , lvd @xcite , borexino @xcite , kamland @xcite , sno+ @xcite , no@xmath10a @xcite and others will together see many thousands of neutrinos from a core collapse event at @xmath11 @xcite . distance estimates based on the observed neutrino flux @xcite , sky localization @xcite , and triggering of gravitational - wave searches by the reconstruction of the time of core bounce @xcite will likely all be possible . well - timed high - statistics coincident neutrino observations will allow to probe in detail a broad range of supernova astrophysics , nuclear physics , and neutrino physics ( see @xcite for overviews ) . fast characteristic temporal variations in the preexplosion neutrino fluxes would be tell - tale signs of multi - dimensional fluid instabilities in the postshock region @xcite and/or early postbounce ring - down oscillations of a rapidly spinning protoneutron star @xcite . while artificially - driven , spherically - symmetric core collapse simulations suggest that a sudden deep drop of the accretion - driven component of the neutrino luminosity ( primarily in @xmath12 and @xmath13 ) within a few hundred milliseconds would indicate the onset of explosion ( e.g. , @xcite ) , the situation is likely different in nature as multidimensional simulations show a much shallower drop due to simultaneous accretion and explosion of material . this leads to a persistent accretion luminosity even after the explosion has begun @xcite . the spectral characteristics and long - term spectral evolution of the neutrino flux could provide important constraints on the nuclear eos @xcite and/or the spin of the progenitor core @xcite . the ability of some detectors to distinguish interactions of different neutrino flavors would lead to constraints on the neutron - to - proton ratio in the neutrino - driven wind phase , allowing an observational test of core - collapse supernovae as potential sites for @xmath14-process nucleosynthesis @xcite . the neutrino signature of core collapse , of the subsequent core - collapse supernova evolution and of the protoneutron star cooling phase , is invariably intertwined with neutrino oscillation physics . the robustness of all of the above mentioned observational conclusions will depend on our understanding of the impact of neutrino flavor oscillations . neutrinos propagating from their emission site to detectors on earth may experience ( _ i _ ) so - called vacuum oscillations driven by neutrino mass differences @xcite , ( _ ii _ ) oscillations mediated by a resonance in @xmath10@xmath15 scattering ( the mikheyev - smirnov - wolfenstein [ msw ] effect ; @xcite ) , and ( _ iii _ ) oscillations due to @xmath10@xmath10 scattering ( @xcite ; see @xcite for a review ) . vacuum and msw oscillations are well understood and their outcomes depend essentially only on neutrino mixing parameters , in particular the neutrino mass hierarchy and the mixing angles . the @xmath10@xmath10-scattering driven oscillations , on the other hand , have a non - linear hamiltonian that may lead to so - called collective oscillations with very complex spatial and temporal outcome that remains to be fully understood ( see , e.g. , @xcite and references therein ) . however , a number of recent studies suggest that collective oscillations may be completely or at least partially suppressed in the preexplosion accretion phase of ordinary core - collapse supernovae @xcite , but see @xcite and @xcite for discrepant results . provided that collective oscillations can be ignored in the preexplosion phase and that the @xmath16 mixing angle indeed has the large value suggested by recent measurements @xcite , the neutrino mass hierarchy may be inferred from the qualitative shape of the early postbounce neutrino signal @xcite . a preexplosion accretion phase with suppressed collective oscillations would also offer the opportunity to probe the structure of the progenitor star on the basis of the observed neutrino signal . the details of the preexplosion neutrino emission have been discussed carefully , e.g. , by @xcite and @xcite and we shall not repeat them here . it is , however , necessary to outline its most salient features . for simplicity , we neglect neutrino oscillations in the following . in core collapse and in the subsequent postbounce evolution , emission of @xmath12 and @xmath13 occurs via charged and neutral currents , while heavy - lepton neutrinos @xmath17 are created exclusively via thermal neutral - current pair processes . before core bounce , only @xmath12 are emitted from electron capture in the collapsing core . milliseconds after core bounce , the shock breaks out of the @xmath12 neutrinosphere ( where the optical depth is @xmath18 ) and a strong burst of @xmath12 is emitted for @xmath5@xmath19 from rapid electron capture on the freshly abundant free protons behind the shock . @xmath20 are copiously created in the hot interior of the protoneutron star after bounce and begin to diffuse out , leading to a steep rise , quick leveling and subsequent slow decay of the @xmath20 luminosity ( @xmath21 ) . @xmath13 production via charged - current positron capture is initially suppressed due to the high degeneracy of the electrons . the latter is partially lifted after bounce at the moderate - density , hot edge of the protoneutron star and @xmath22 rises , reaching or surpassing the value at which @xmath23 levels off after the neutronization burst decays . the subsequent preexplosion luminosity can roughly be split into a diffusive component from the core and accretion luminosity ( @xmath24 \dot{m } / r_\nu$ ] , where @xmath25 is an approximate neutrinosphere radius ) from or from above the neutrinosphere @xcite . @xmath21 is primarily diffusive , while @xmath23 and @xmath22 are dominated by accretion . in general , @xmath26 , but @xmath27 . @xmath20 have the lowest opacity , since they interact only via neutral currents . they decouple from matter at the smallest radii and highest temperatures and thus have the highest average energies @xmath28 . @xmath13 have a slightly lower opacity than @xmath12 , leading to the well established neutrino energy hierarchy in the preexplosion phase @xmath29 . the mean energy of all species grows with increasing postbounce time , reflecting the recession of the neutrinospheres due to the contraction of the protoneutron star . considering that the accretion luminosity will scale with the postbounce accretion rate @xmath30 , one would naturally expect an increase of the detected neutrino interactions with increasing mass of the stellar core . since higher accretion rates correspond to more material compressing and settling more rapidly on the protoneutron star , the latter s outer regions will be hotter . thus the thermal neutral - current emission will be enhanced , leading to higher luminosities and higher mean neutrino energies . the variation of the preexplosion neutrino signal with progenitor star zams mass was first discussed by @xcite based on the pioneering simulations of @xcite and @xcite . these authors provided total emission characteristics and spectra that show a systematic increase of total energy emitted in neutrinos and mean @xmath13 energy with zams mass in the range from @xmath31 . @xcite , before sn 1987a , carried out simulations of a range of progenitor stars with zams mass in the range @xmath32 . they found that the @xmath12 neutronization burst shows little dependence on the progenitor , due to the rather universal homologous collapse and bounce dynamics . furthermore , they mentioned , though did not discuss in detail , that the luminosities and mean neutrino energies increase as a function of iron core mass ( and not zams mass ) . a more detailed and clear physical discussion was provided by @xcite , who contrasted the predicted neutrino signal from the early postbounce phase in two different progenitor core models with neutrino observations of sn 1987a . he noted that there are significant uncertainties in connecting a given zams mass to precollapse structure . instead of a progenitor with an associated zams mass , he considered a massive ( and high - entropy ) @xmath33-@xmath34 iron core model and a lower - mass ( and lower - entropy ) @xmath35-@xmath34 iron core model in his spherically - symmetric ( 1d ) neutrino radiation - hydrodynamic simulations . he showed that the more massive core leads to a consistently higher @xmath13 luminosity in both the accretion and diffusion sectors . the water cherenkov detectors that observed neutrinos from sn 1987a are most sensitive to the inverse beta decay ( ibd ) reaction @xmath36 . @xcite predicted a factor of two difference in the integrated number of early ibd interactions between the massive and the low - mass core in these detectors . he concluded that the neutrino signal observed by these detectors from sn 1987a was most consistent with the low - mass core . @xcite , who carried out a parameter study of quasi - hydrostatic protoneutron star cooling , considering various initial masses , ad - hoc accretion rates , and different nuclear eos , found a similar trend . he showed that more massive cores , higher accretion rates , and softer eos lead to stronger , higher - energy neutrino emission . some of his strongest emitters were cases in which eventually a black hole was formed . liebendrfer and collaborators carried out a sequence of studies of the progenitor dependence of the neutrino signal using modern general relativistic 1d radiation - hydrodynamics simulations @xcite . they showed that the @xmath12 neutronization burst is indeed almost independent of progenitor structure ( as first suggested by @xcite ) . they also qualitatively and quantitatively connected the evolution of the postbounce preexplosion luminosity to the postbounce accretion rate , but did not discuss observational implications . their results were corroborated by similarly sophisticated subsequent studies of @xcite . of these , @xcite presented the most comprehensive analysis and also compared between 1d and axisymmetric ( 2d ) results . they found that in 2d , convection in the protoneutron star alters the structure of the latter , affecting the neutrino emission starting @xmath5@xmath37 after bounce , but preserving the overall systematics with accretion rate . @xcite also were the only authors to suggest that the accretion - rate dependence of luminosity and total emitted energy in the preexplosion phase could be used to infer the structure of the progenitor . the other studies , being focused on aspects such as neutrino oscillations , black hole formation , or the late - time post - explosion evolution , did not consider observational consequences . @xcite , using a limited set of three progenitor models ( \{@xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath40}@xmath41 at zams ) , found similar systematics as the aforementioned studies , but also carried out an analysis of the expected signal in various neutrino detectors in the first @xmath42 after bounce . they computed ibd interaction rates for their @xmath40-@xmath34 and @xmath38-@xmath34 and found a factor of two more ibd interactions for the former , which would allow a high - confidence distinction between these progenitors for a galactic core collapse event . however , their @xmath39-@xmath34 model yielded a postbounce neutrino signal very similar to that of their @xmath38-@xmath34 model and would be indistinguishable by neutrino observations alone . this suggests that zams mass is not a good parameter to describe presupernova stellar structure ( cf . , @xcite ) . in this article , we present a fresh look at the progenitor dependence of the neutrino signature in the preexplosion accretion phase of core - collapse supernovae . we perform 1d general relativistic radiation - hydrodynamics core collapse simulations of 32 progenitor models from the single - star solar - metallicity presupernova model suite of @xcite and follow the postbounce preexplosion evolution for @xmath43 . in zams mass , these models range from @xmath0 to @xmath1 , but guided by the previous results discussed in the above , we choose not to parameterize our simulations by zams mass . instead we employ the compactness parameter @xmath44 ( for a relevant mass scale @xmath45 , measured at the time of bounce ) . as shown in @xcite , and further explored in @xcite , @xmath46 is a quantitative stellar structure parameter that describes the postbounce accretion evolution to a remnant mass scale @xmath45 . we demonstrate that the preexplosion neutrino emission is very well parameterized by the compactness . the preexplosion luminosities and mean energies of all neutrino species increase essentially monotonically with increasing @xmath46 . we compute predicted integrated ibd interactions for a galactic core - collapse supernova in the super - kamiokande detector and show that the clear systematics governed by @xmath46 carries over to observation , even when standard msw neutrino oscillations are taken into account . our results thus indicate that in the absence of complicated collective neutrino oscillations a high - statistics detection of neutrinos from the preexplosion phase will allow , in principle , a tight constraint of the compactness of the progenitor star s core . this , however , will require knowledge of the nuclear eos and of the rotation rate of the collapsed core , since , as we show , both can dilute the otherwise clear compactness - dependent neutrino emission systematics . this paper is structured as follows . in [ sec : methods ] , we discuss our general relativistic hydrodynamics code gr1d and introduce its extension to neutrino radiation - hydrodynamics in the two - moment approximation , nugr1d . the initial models and the employed eos are discussed in [ sec : models ] . in [ sec : boltzmanncompare ] , we present results from a benchmark collapse and postbounce simulation that allows us to compare with the previously published code comparison of @xcite to assess nugr1d s ability to reproduce results of full boltzmann neutrino transport . we present the results of our simulations in [ sec : results ] , analyze the dependence of the neutrino signal on progenitor compactness , discuss predicted ibd signals from a galactic core collapse event in the super - kamiokande detector , and explore potential degeneracies introduced by eos and rotation . finally , in [ sec : discussion ] , we critically summarize our work and conclude by contrasting our results with the early neutrino signal observed from sn 1987a . we make use of the open - source 1d general relativistic hydrodynamics code ` gr1d ` ( @xcite ; available at http://www.stellarcollapse.org ) outfitted with an energy - dependent multi - species m1 neutrino transport scheme in which the zeroth and first moments of the neutrino distribution function are evolved . we refer the reader to @xcite for details on ` gr1d ` and describe in the following our current implementation of the transport scheme . for this first application , we neglect the computationally - expensive energy - coupling neutrino interactions and transport terms these terms are undoubtedly important for making highly accurate predictions of the neutrino signature ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) , but are unlikely to affect the general trends we observe . we will address them in future work , but provide a discussion on the consequences of neglecting these terms via a comparison to full boltzmann neutrino transport simulations in . our m1 scheme closely follows @xcite , who formulate the m1 evolution equations in a closed covariant form . the scheme is simplified greatly by neglecting the energy - coupling terms . this further requires that the velocity dependent terms are also ignored . in this limit , and using the schwarzschild - like metric and radial - polar slicing of ` gr1d ` and setting @xmath47 , the coordinate frame evolution equations for the neutrino energy density , @xmath48 , and the neutrino flux vector , @xmath49 , simplify from equations 3.37 and 3.38 of @xcite to @xmath50 and @xmath51 where @xmath52 is the neutrino interaction source term ( see below ) , @xmath53 is the lapse function and @xmath54 . @xmath55 is the neutrino pressure tensor and is taken to be an interpolation between the two limiting cases of free streaming and diffusion . we follow @xcite , who express @xmath56 as @xmath57 where @xmath58 is the eddington factor , taken here to be the maximum entropy closure in a closed , analytic form @xcite , @xmath59 in the no - velocity limit for ` gr1d ` , @xmath60 . the free streaming and diffusion limits of the neutrino pressure tensor are @xmath61 and @xmath62 , respectively . we set out to solve the system of equations via standard hyperbolic methods borrowed from conservative hydrodynamic schemes @xcite . transport variables live at cell centers and we employ piece - wise linear reconstruction to cell interfaces with van leer s limiter @xcite and the hlle approximate riemann solver @xcite for calculating the intercell fluxes . a complication arises when solving the neutrino moment equations in the high - opacity limit . in this case , the standard fluxes returned from the riemann solver are dominated by a numerical diffusion term . we follow @xcite and modify the fluxes to correct for this . essentially , the modified fluxes return the diffusion - limit flux in the high opacity limit . the modified form of the neutrino energy density flux through the @xmath63 interface is given by @xmath64 the corresponding modified interface flux for the neutrino flux evolution equation is , @xmath65 with @xmath66 in these equations , @xmath67 controls the modification to the fluxes to account for the high opacity . following @xcite , we take @xmath68 where @xmath69 is the sum of the scattering and absorptive opacities . these opacities are strong functions of energy and are also species dependent . we note that when @xmath67 is 1 , the intercell fluxes reduce to the standard hlle approximation . the characteristic speeds needed for the hlle scheme are calculated in the same spirit as the neutrino pressure tensor @xcite , @xmath70 where in the zero velocity limit , @xmath71 and @xmath72 . @xmath73 and @xmath74 are the maximum and minimum values , respectively , of these characteristic speeds evaluated from both the right and left reconstructed variables . finally , the source terms in and [ eq : fluxevolution ] are taken from @xcite . in the zero velocity limit , @xmath75 where @xmath76 , @xmath77 , and @xmath78 are the neutrino emissivity , neutrino absorption opacity , and the neutrino scattering opacity , respectively we precompute the neutrino interaction terms for each neutrinos species ( we treat @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath79 ) and neutrino energy group in dense tabular form as a function of density @xmath80 , temperature @xmath81 , and electron fraction @xmath82 . we then use linear interpolation for efficient on - the - fly interpolation . we include all standard iso - energetic scattering processes , charged - current absorption and emission , and thermal pair - production processes @xcite in the calculation of the neutrino interaction terms . since the neutrino matter interactions for heavy - lepton neutrinos and antineutrinos are slightly different , ` nulib ` averages the two values of the emissivities and opacities . our library of neutrino interaction routines , which we call ` nulib ` , is open source and available as a github repository at http://www.nulib.org . ` nulib ` requires an eos for the evaluation of the emissivities and opacities . our treatment of thermal pair - processes in gr1d warrants some comments . since we do not currently consider energy ( or species ) coupling for thermal emission processes such as electron positron annihilation to a neutrino antineutrino pair , we compute an emissivity based on the thermal content of the matter ignoring any final state neutrino blocking . to limit the neutrino energy density to the equilibrium value ( where neutrino - antineutrino annihilation rates are in equilibrium with the thermal pair production rates ) , we use kirchhoff s law to derive an _ effective _ absorption opacity for neutrino antineutrino annihilation from the thermal emissivity , @xmath83 where @xmath84 is the thermal energy density of neutrinos with energy @xmath48 and @xmath85}+1)$ ] is the equilibrium neutrino distribution function with chemical potential @xmath86 . as we shall see , this method performs well at predicting the thermal neutrino flux of the heavy - lepton neutrinos during the preexplosion phase . in ` nugr1d ` , we first update the hydrodynamic variables to the @xmath87-th timestep . we then compute the neutrino opacities and emissivities associated with the updated hydrodynamic variables . we update the radiation field operator - split . the flux term is solved explicitly , using the radiation moments of the @xmath88-th timestep . we calculate the neutrino matter interaction terms using the @xmath87 radiation moments via a local implicit update . with the @xmath87 radiation energy density source term , we then update the energy density and electron fraction of the matter . we use 24 energy groups , with lowest - energy group centers at 0.5mev and 1.5mev , and then spaced logarithmically up to 200mev for @xmath12 , @xmath13 and @xmath20 . we note that for the highest energy bins it occasionally occurs that the evolved neutrino flux vector exceeds the evolved neutrino energy density . this tends to occur in the most dynamic phases of our simulations and where the opacities vary significantly from one zone to the next . when this is the case we limit the neutrino flux to the neutrino energy density . we extract the radiation quantities in the coordinate frame at a radius of 500 km . we employ the most recent non - rotating solar - metallicity single - star model set from the stellar evolution code ` kepler ` @xcite . this model set contains the presupernova configuration of 32 stars ranging in zams mass from 12@xmath34 to 120@xmath34 . we denote individual models by @xmath89wh07 , where @xmath90 corresponds to the integer zams mass of the model , e.g. , @xmath91wh07 is the @xmath92-@xmath34 model of this model set . in @xcite , we investigated this and other model sets in the context of black hole formation . under the assumption of a failed core - collapse supernova , we found a strong empirical relation between the properties of the presupernova structure and the evolution of the failing supernova , e.g. , the time to black hole formation . this led to a clear prediction : if we observe black hole formation in a failed core - collapse supernova via neutrinos , the lifetime of the protoneutron star ( and thus of the neutrino signal ) relays direct information about the presupernova structure . however , such a prediction , ( _ i _ ) requires a failed supernova , which may not be the norm , and ( _ ii _ ) has a strong dependence on the nuclear equation of state . the empirical parameter introduced in @xcite is the compactness of the progenitor , measured at the time of core bounce . it is an inverse measure of the radial extent of a given mass coordinate at the time of bounce , @xmath93 where @xmath94 is the radial coordinate that encloses a baryonic mass of @xmath45 at the time of core bounce . in @xcite , we chose @xmath95 , since this is the relevant mass scale for black hole formation , i.e. , a typical maximum baryonic mass at which a range of eos can no longer support a neutron star against gravity . in this study , we primarily use @xmath96 . the motivation for this is that during the postbounce preexplosion phase , the relevant mass scale , especially for models with relatively small compactness , is much less than 2.5@xmath34 . in this study , we choose 1.75@xmath34 because this is close to the average baryonic mass inside the shock at 200300ms after bounce for all models : in the two extreme models that span the space in compactness parameter ( model s12wh07 , [ @xmath97 and @xmath98 , on the lower end ; model s40wh07 [ @xmath99 and @xmath100 on the upper end ) , the baryonic mass accreted through the shock at 250 ms after bounce is 1.45 m and 2.05 m , respectively . we further justify our motivation of using @xmath96 over @xmath101 in . in , we plot both @xmath96 and @xmath101 versus zams mass for all 32 considered models . @xmath96 is provided in for all models . for , one notes that while @xmath96 and @xmath101 differ quantitatively , there is no significant qualitative difference between them . the overall trends transcending individual models remain , including the two regions of high compactness near 2225@xmath34 and 3545@xmath34 . @xmath96 simply provides a more fine - grained parameterization at the lower mass scale relevant in the first few hundred milliseconds after bounce . note , however , that there are a few models that have similar @xmath101 , but rather different density structure at small enclosed masses and radii and , hence , a different @xmath96 . models @xmath10214wh07 and @xmath10216wh07 are examples . and @xmath101 . the mapping between zams mass and precollapse structure is highly non - monotonic , making the former an ill - suited parameter for describing progenitor structure in core collapse simulations . ] in this study we perform core collapse simulations with each progenitor and two eos . we use the eos of @xcite with a nuclear incompressibility of 220mev . the ls220 eos is based on a compressible liquid - drop model of the nucleus . of the publicly available nuclear eos , the ls220 eos best matches the constraints from nuclear theory and astrophysical observations ( see fig . 1 of @xcite and @xcite ) . we also employ the relativistic mean field eos of @xcite that is based on the tm1 parameter set . it is very different from the ls220 eos . the maximum neutrino - less @xmath103-equilibrium cold neutron star gravitational masses are 2.04@xmath34 and 2.24@xmath34 for the ls220 and hshen eos , respectively . the radius of a neutrino - less @xmath103-equilibrium cold neutron star with a gravitational mass of 1.4@xmath34 using the ls220 eos is 12.7 km . for the hshen eos , the corresponding radius is 14.6 km . for details on our particular implementation and the treatment of the low - density eos , we refer the reader to @xcite . the eos tables , reader and interpolation routines are available from http://www.stellarcollapse.org . since our implementation of neutrino transport is new and approximate , a comparison with published results of full boltzmann neutrino transport is warranted . this will allow us to test the ability of our code to reproduce the neutrino luminosities and spectral properties in the preexplosion phase . we compare ` nugr1d ` with the results of @xcite , a comparison study between two boltzmann neutrino transport codes ] . the two codes , @xcite , and ` vertex ` @xcite , approach the neutrino transport problem in very different ways . their results compare very well in the newtonian limit , but show significant quantitative differences in the general relativistic case . subsequent modifications to the approximate general relativistic potential used in ` vertex ` @xcite have since removed many of the quantitative differences between the codes . the general relativistic test case of @xcite was the collapse and early postbounce evolution of a @xmath39-@xmath34 ( at zams ) solar - metallicity progenitor of @xcite , referred to as model @xmath10215ww95 in the following . they employed the ls180 eos @xcite and a baseline set of neutrino - matter interactions , including coupling of energy groups via inelastic scattering processes @xcite . we repeat their test here , using the same initial conditions and eos , with our current approximations and compare the neutrino observables . we emphasize again that the current version of ` nugr1d ` lacks inelastic neutrino electron scattering and velocity dependent transport terms . both are included in the simulations of @xcite . our transport scheme evolves only the zeroth and first moment of the neutrino distribution function , using an analytic closure to truncate the series of moment equations , whereas @xcite solve the full boltzmann equation for neutrino transport . 15ww95 progenitor . these luminosities ( top panels ) and energies ( bottom panels ) correspond to the comparison study of @xcite . the left panels contain results for @xmath12 , the right panels show @xmath13 ( thick lines ) and @xmath20 ( thin lines ) results . the inset plot in the upper left panel shows the @xmath12 luminosity around core bounce . shown in solid black lines are luminosities and root mean squared energies obtained with ` nugr1d ` . the blue dashed lines and red dashed - dotted lines are the results from @xcite using the ` vertex ` code @xcite and code @xcite , respectively . the thin dashed black lines ( labeled as ` nugr1d ` * ) are curves from a test simulation using profile data from the ` vertex ` simulation 5ms before bounce as starting data . a detailed discussion of the differences is provided in the text . ] in , we show the luminosities ( top panels ) and root mean squared energies ( bottom panels ) of three neutrino species : @xmath12 ( left panels ) , and @xmath13 and @xmath20 ( right panels ) . both the luminosity and root mean squared energies are defined in @xcite , section 4 . the black solid lines are the results obtained with ` nugr1d ` , the red dashed - dotted lines are the predictions of , and the blue dashed lines are the ` vertex ` results . overall , the agreement is good , however there are are several systematic differences : ( _ i _ ) the magnitudes of the @xmath12 and @xmath13 luminosities in the early postbounce phase predicted by ` nugr1d ` agree well with the results but they are systematically lower than the ` vertex ` results . this discrepancy , which also exists between ` vertex ` and the , has been further investigated in @xcite and has since been resolved . the updated ` vertex ` code employs an improved general relativistic potential and gives comparable amplitudes to , and hence ` nugr1d ` . ( _ ii _ ) the time when the silicon oxygen interface ( located at a baryonic mass coordinate of 1.43@xmath34 in model @xmath10215ww95 ) accretes through the shock , which is marked by a sharp drop in the @xmath12 and @xmath13 luminosities , is earlier ( at @xmath104ms ) in our simulations than in the simulations of @xcite ( @xmath105ms in the ` vertex ` simulations and @xmath13 luminosities begins around the same time as in the ` vertex ` simulations . ] ) . we have carried out a number of tests to try to understand this difference . we have varied the zero point of the internal energy , which affects the relativistic enthalpy entering the momentum and energy equations and alters the collapse time . we have attempted different mappings of the presupernova stellar structure to our eulerian grid , we have tested variations in precollapse electron capture by parameterizing @xmath82 as a function of density in the collapse phase @xcite , and we have replaced the low density compositions with a pure silicon gas ( which replaces the nse equivalent of mainly iron and therefore better represents the low density matter ) . none of these tests led to a change of the postbounce time to silicon oxygen interface accretion by more than @xmath510ms . without currently having the modeling technology to test it , we suspect that the apparent difference may be due to the only other obvious difference between ` nugr1d ` and ` vertex ` : our lack of detailed neutrino physics during the collapse phase . two facts lead us to this conclusion . the collapse time discrepancy between the ` vertex ` ( @xmath106ms ) and ( @xmath107ms ) and ` nugr1d ` ( @xmath108ms ) can be explained by the lack of inelastic scattering . @xcite gives a @xmath109ms in when neutrino - electron inelastic scattering is neglected . this collapse time difference , @xmath540ms , is the difference in the silicon - oxygen interface accretion times . also , when we map in the ` vertex ` profiles from @xcite at 5ms before bounce to ` nugr1d ` and continue the evolution we reproduce the postbounce time that the silicon - oxygen interface reaches the shock . we show the result of this simulation with a thin dashed curve , marked as nugr1d * , in . it is worth noting that there may be additional differences due to the simplistic treatment of the eos at low densities . below a density of @xmath110g@xmath111 , ` vertex ` replaces the nuclear statistical equilibrium ( nse ) eos with an eos that specifically depends on the composition of the matter . assumes all matter below this density is silicon . both have some treatment of nuclear burning . in ` gr1d ` , as discussed in @xcite , we assume nse compositions from the nuclear eos . at densities below the validity regime of the nuclear eos , we take the compositions at the lowest density point from the nuclear eos and use the timmes eos @xcite . for reference , the initial density of the silicon oxygen interface is 0.41.0@xmath112g@xmath111 , where the range represents the extent in density space . ( _ iii _ ) the @xmath12 and @xmath13 root mean squared energies , predicted by ` nugr1d ` agree very well with the boltzmann transport results during the postbounce phase . the difference seen in the @xmath20 root mean squared energy is similar to that observed by @xcite and @xcite when investigating the effects of inelastic neutrino electron scattering . in the postbounce evolution , this interaction is expected to predominately affect the @xmath20 neutrino . we currently ignore this process in ` nugr1d ` and note that the @xmath20 luminosity predicted by ` nugr1d ` still agrees well with the full boltzmann results . ( _ iv _ ) another difference between the evolution in ` nugr1d ` and the full boltzmann transport results arises in the collapse phase . the lack of velocity terms and inelastic @xmath113 scattering significantly effects the composition of the inner core . in simulations with inelastic @xmath113 scattering , neutrinos from electron capture on free protons down - scatter off of electrons to lower energies . since the optical depth is lower , these neutrinos can then escape , deleptonizing the core . in our simulations , these high - energy neutrinos can not down - scatter and therefore can not escape . deleptonization is suppressed until later phases , when central density and temperature are higher . the lack of velocity - dependent terms delays full trapping by neutrino advection that would normally begin to occur at @xmath114g@xmath111 until nuclear densities , allowing for further deleptonization . at bounce the central value of @xmath82 are @xmath50.22 compared to @xmath50.29 in ` vertex ` and . the root mean squared @xmath12 energies predicted by ` nugr1d ` are higher during the prebounce phase , because the neutrinos do not experience the down - scattering via inelastic neutrino electron scattering . overall , we find that differences in the inner core structure and composition at bounce do not strongly present themselves in the neutrino signal after the collapse phase . therefore , for this study , we find the current version of ` nugr1d ` to be acceptable , since our primary focus is the neutrino signal of the preexplosion accretion phase . we do note , however , that the lack of energy - coupling terms in our transport can cause qualitative differences near black hole formation . when energy - coupling terms , such as gravitational redshift , are included , then the @xmath12 and @xmath13 luminosities drop off at times very close to black hole formation , as seen in @xcite . this effect can be captured with ` gr1d ` s leakage scheme in which it is trivial to include redshift terms @xcite . capturing redshift in an energy - dependent transport scheme requires energy - group coupling . we have also compared our m1 scheme to the results of @xcite for the 40@xmath34 model from @xcite using the ls180 eos . in this model a black hole forms within 500ms of bounce . we find differences in the @xmath12 and @xmath13 luminosities of @xmath51020% in the last @xmath550ms , but good agreement in the early postbounce phase . rcccccccccccc @xmath10212 & 0.235 & 19.24 / 14.19 / 7.73 & 1.02 / 0.92 & 2.13 / 1.78 + @xmath10213 & 0.383 & 22.18 / 16.58 / 8.76 & 1.25 / 1.09 & 2.53 / 2.07 + @xmath10214 & 0.537 & 25.19 / 19.35 / 9.24 & 1.36 / 1.20 & 3.06 / 2.49 + @xmath10215 & 0.580 & 25.51 / 19.59 / 9.17 & 1.30 / 1.16 & 3.13 / 2.59 + @xmath10216 & 0.338 & 18.91 / 13.72 / 8.20 & 1.11 / 0.95 & 2.00 / 1.68 + @xmath10217 & 0.383 & 19.93 / 14.54 / 8.57 & 1.20 / 1.02 & 2.13 / 1.78 + @xmath10218 & 0.738 & 28.66 / 22.26 / 10.30 & 1.55 / 1.36 & 3.62 / 2.92 + @xmath10219 & 0.544 & 23.36 / 17.49 / 9.37 & 1.43 / 1.23 & 2.67 / 2.18 + @xmath10220 & 0.944 & 29.39 / 22.70 / 11.08 & 1.79 / 1.55 & 3.64 / 2.91 + @xmath10221 & 0.325 & 18.48 / 13.41 / 8.09 & 1.04 / 0.91 & 1.95 / 1.65 + @xmath10222 & 0.972 & 30.06 / 23.29 / 11.26 & 1.82 / 1.58 & 3.76 / 3.00 + @xmath10223 & 1.256 & 42.00 / 33.88 / 14.68 & 2.29 / 2.00 & 5.99 / 4.67 + @xmath10224 & 1.167 & 39.14 / 31.35 / 13.66 & 2.16 / 1.89 & 5.44 / 4.24 + @xmath10225 & 1.040 & 32.30 / 25.28 / 11.87 & 1.93 / 1.68 & 4.15 / 3.28 + @xmath10226 & 0.727 & 24.97 / 18.84 / 10.10 & 1.59 / 1.38 & 2.88 / 2.33 + @xmath10227 & 0.783 & 25.67 / 19.45 / 10.21 & 1.61 / 1.40 & 3.01 / 2.42 + @xmath10228 & 0.640 & 25.86 / 19.83 / 9.54 & 1.36 / 1.21 & 3.16 / 2.62 + @xmath10229 & 0.556 & 23.24 / 17.38 / 9.43 & 1.45 / 1.22 & 2.64 / 2.17 + @xmath10230 & 0.760 & 26.61 / 20.30 / 10.19 & 1.60 / 1.40 & 3.20 / 2.58 + @xmath10231 & 0.687 & 25.23 / 19.09 / 9.95 & 1.56 / 1.35 & 2.96 / 2.40 + @xmath10232 & 0.883 & 28.10 / 21.58 / 10.70 & 1.71 / 1.49 & 3.43 / 2.75 + @xmath10233 & 0.965 & 30.36 / 23.57 / 11.28 & 1.82 / 1.58 & 3.82 / 3.04 + @xmath10235 & 1.129 & 35.93 / 28.50 / 12.77 & 2.06 / 1.79 & 4.83 / 3.79 + @xmath10240 & 1.328 & 48.32 / 39.45 / 17.51 & 2.49 / 2.21 & 7.23 / 5.75 + @xmath10245 & 1.300 & 46.42 / 37.81 / 16.56 & 2.42 / 2.14 & 6.86 / 5.44 + @xmath10250 & 0.701 & 25.60 / 19.42 / 10.00 & 1.57 / 1.32 & 3.02 / 2.45 + @xmath10255 & 0.577 & 23.56 / 17.65 / 9.52 & 1.48 / 1.25 & 2.69 / 2.20 + @xmath10260 & 0.461 & 21.52 / 15.88 / 9.07 & 1.33 / 1.12 & 2.36 / 1.95 + @xmath10270 & 0.755 & 25.83 / 19.58 / 10.17 & 1.60 / 1.39 & 3.04 / 2.46 + @xmath10280 & 0.591 & 23.75 / 17.80 / 9.63 & 1.48 / 1.26 & 2.71 / 2.22 + @xmath102100 & 0.792 & 29.90 / 23.33 / 10.59 & 1.61 / 1.42 & 3.82 / 3.07 + @xmath102120 & 0.474 & 22.31 / 16.64 / 9.02 & 1.33 / 1.15 & 2.52 / 2.07 + [ tab : results ] we perform core collapse and early postbounce evolutions of all 32 models introduced in using both the ls220 and the hshen eos . in we present the three neutrino luminosities and average energies for each model and eos as a function of postbounce time . we do not expect a clear trend in the neutrino observables with zams mass . however , we do expect trends based on the presupernova structure of the star , which is well encapsulated by the compactness parameter introduced in [ sec : models ] . in the top set of panels we show simulations run using the ls220 eos . in the bottom panels , simulations performed with the hshen eos are shown . to highlight that there is indeed a trend with presupernova structure , we color - code individual models according to their compactness parameter . the mapping between line color and @xmath96 is provided on the right . to more directly highlight the eos dependence , we include the luminosity and average energies of two models run with the ls220 eos in the hshen eos panels with thick dashed lines . these models , @xmath10212wh07 and @xmath10240wh07 , have the lowest and highest compactness parameter in our model set , respectively . we find that there is little variation in the peak luminosity of the @xmath12 neutronization burst signal . for all 32 models simulated using the ls220 ( hshen ) eos , the peak amplitude varies by less than 3% ( 5% ) from the average . this reflects the universal nature of the collapse of the inner core @xcite . after the neutronization burst , the postbounce luminosities of all species increase systematically with increasing compactness parameter . models with higher @xmath96 have higher temperatures throughout the protoneutron star @xcite . this increases the diffusive neutrino luminosity and is best seen in the @xmath20 luminosities . the postbounce accretion rate also increases with the compactness parameter . higher accretion rates , and the deeper gravitational potential due to the higher protoneutron star mass , increase the accretion luminosity , which is most directly reflected in the @xmath12 and @xmath13 signals . after roughly 100ms , the average energy of the emitted neutrinos also shows an increasing trend with the compactness parameter . the matter temperature at the neutrinosphere is higher in models with larger compactness , therefore a higher average neutrino energy is observed at infinity . the neutrino luminosities and average energies from simulations using the hshen eos are systematically lower than the luminosities and average energies from simulations of the same model run with the ls220 eos . this is clearly seen in the bottom set of panels in : models @xmath10212wh07-ls220 and @xmath10240wh07-ls220 have luminosities and average energies that are comparable to or larger than in the corresponding hshen models . for a fixed accretion rate ( or fixed progenitor model ) , the location of the neutrinosphere of each species influences the emitted luminosities and spectra . in models evolved with the stiff hshen eos , the neutrinospheres are located systematically at larger radii and lower matter temperatures than in models run with the softer ls220 eos . for example , in the @xmath10212wh07 simulations , the rosseland - mean @xmath12 neutrinospheres at 200ms after bounce have radii and temperatures of @xmath535.3 km and @xmath54.86mev ; and @xmath539.5 km and @xmath54.46mev for the ls220 and the hshen eos , respectively . the larger neutrinosphere radii are responsible for the lower accretion luminosity since the latter is set essentially by the product of the mass accretion rate and the gravitational potential at the protoneutron star surface @xcite . the latter is located at larger radii in simulations using the hshen eos . the differences in the neutrinosphere radii and temperatures between the ls220 and hshen eos also give an explanation for the systematically lower average neutrino energies seen in the hshen simulations . matter at larger radii has been compressed less and therefore is cooler . this leads to average neutrino energies that can be up to 5mev lower for the hshen eos than for the ls220 eos for the same progenitor model ( see ) . the difference in the neutrino luminosities and average energies between the two eos is largest for models with @xmath115 , in which the high accretion rates lead to the accumulation of @xmath52@xmath34 of material inside the shock within @xmath5200300ms of bounce . in the case of the ls220 eos , this leads to very high temperatures throughout the protoneutron star as it becomes more and more compact and closer to gravitational collapse to a black hole . in our simulations , the most compact model @xmath10240wh07 ( @xmath99 , @xmath116 ) forms a black hole 503ms after bounce . the slightly less compact model @xmath10245wh07 ( @xmath117 , @xmath118 ) forms a black hole 563ms after bounce . the high temperatures present in the ls220 simulations at these times will not be obtained until postbounce times @xmath119 in models using the hshen eos40wh07 and @xmath10245wh07 models are @xmath51.3s and @xmath51.4s , respectively , when using the hshen eos . ] . + most neutrino detectors are most sensitive to the electron antineutrino luminosity through the dominant ibd interaction , @xmath120 . in the left panel of , we consider the cumulative emitted @xmath13 energy for each model using the ls220 eos . we color code the models based on their compactness parameter and include two reference models that use the hshen eos , model @xmath10212wh07 and model @xmath10240wh07 . the graphs shown in this panel are the integral of the graphs shown in the top center panel of . it is obvious that the cumulative amount of @xmath13 energy emitted during the preexplosion phase strongly correlates with the compactness of the progenitor model . for example , the amount of emitted @xmath13 energy from model @xmath10240wh07 ( @xmath99 ) is _ always _ between two and three times of that of model @xmath10212wh07 ( @xmath97 ) . we make this point more quantitative in the center and right panels of . in the center ( right ) panel we plot the cumulative emitted @xmath13 energy at 100 , 200 , 300 , and 400ms after bounce for both eos as a function of @xmath96 ( @xmath101 ) . for reference , we present a subset of these numbers in . we see a very clear correlation that depends only weakly on the chosen eos . note , however , that for models with small compactness parameter ( @xmath121 ) , the correlation between the total emitted @xmath13 energy and the compactness parameter is not as strong after 400ms of postbounce evolution . comparing the center and right panels justifies our choice of @xmath96 over @xmath101 as explained in . the onset of an explosion will break the correlation observed in . once it is launched , the accretion luminosity effectively turns off and only the diffusion luminosity remains . one also expects this diffusion luminosity to show a correlation with the compactness of the progenitor , since the remnant protoneutron star s thermodynamic conditions , such as the central entropy and its mass , are essentially set by the presupernova structure . however , it is currently unclear whether one should obtain a correlation between explosion time and the compactness parameter . clarification will require a more complete understanding of the core - collapse supernova explosion mechanism and may require extensive parameter studies with fully self - consistent three - dimensional simulations . and is provided in . the dashed lines are results for models @xmath10212wh07 and @xmath10240wh07 run with the hshen eos . in the inset we show the cumulative ibd interactions as a function of @xmath96 for each model and eos at four postbounce times : 100 , 200 , 300 , and 400ms . ] we use the publicly available software ` snowglobes ` ] to predict the neutrino signal observed in earth - based neutrino detectors . ` snowglobes ` @xcite , which in turn relies on ` globes ` @xcite , is a set of routines that compute the interaction rates of supernova neutrinos in user - specified detector configurations . variables include detector material ( e.g. , water , scintillator , argon , and lead ) , detector volume , detector response functions , and a host of relevant neutrino interactions . for this investigation , we consider only ibd interactions in a water cherenkov detector . we choose a detector mass of 32kt , the mass of water in super - kamiokande that is sensitive to core - collapse supernova neutrinos @xcite . for reference , we use the ` wc100kt30prct ` smearing rates and efficiencies provided with ` snowglobes ` . we construct ` snowglobes ` initial fluence data from our simulations binned in 5ms intervals . we provide these energy - dependent fluences at http://www.stellarcollapse.org/m1prog for all models , neutrino species , and both eos in 5ms intervals up to 450ms after bounce . we assume a fiducial galactic supernova distance of 10kpc . in , we show the cumulative number of interactions for each model run with the ls220 eos and , for reference , two models run with the hshen eos . the lines are color - coded according to compactness parameter . note that the vertical scale in this figure is in thousands of interactions . we note that our answers agree with the total number of expected detected interactions in super - kamiokande from a galactic core - collapse supernova at 10kpc , which is estimated to be @xmath57000 @xcite . to arrive at this number from our results , consider the lowest zams mass progenitor in our model set , model @xmath10212wh07 . after 450ms of evolution , 15b of @xmath13 energy has been radiated ( ) , which corresponds to 2000 ibd detected interactions ( ) . for 50b of released energy ( @xmath51/6 of 300b , the fiducial energy released in neutrinos over the entire cooling phase ) , one would then expect @xmath57000 detected interactions . however , as is clear from , the number of detected interactions from the next galactic supernova may be higher than this fiducial number . more importantly , the rate of interactions in the preexplosion phase will give us detailed information on the progenitor core structure . in order to more directly quantify the differences between variations in progenitor compactness and variations in the nuclear eos , we plot in the inset of the number of expected ibd detected interactions in a super - kamiokande - like water cherenkov detector at various postbounce times versus @xmath96 . there is a well defined trend : the number of ibd interactions detected in the first 100 , 200 , 300 , and 400ms increases with the compactness parameter of the models . for reference , we include the expected number of interactions at 200 and 400ms for both eos in . we find that the eos dependence of the expected number of interactions is similar to the eos dependence of the total emitted @xmath13 energy : the hshen eos leads to a lower number of interactions ( compare the inset of to the center panel of ) . the dependence on eos is somewhat stronger here , since the the lower average @xmath13 energy predicted from stiffer eos translates into a reduced cross section in earth - based detectors . in addition to the total number of interactions , a water cherenkov detector measures individual energies , and thus , allows for the reconstruction of the cumulative emitted @xmath13 energy over time . this reconstruction will depend on the detector s response function and efficiency . an additional independent path to experimentally probing the inner structure of the progenitor is via the total neutrino energy emitted in all species over the first 10s of seconds after the initial collapse . this method requires a measurement of the total fluence of neutrinos of all species , not just electron antineutrinos . examples of neutrino interactions capable of relaying such information are the mono - energetic de - excitation of a neutral - current neutrino - excitation of @xmath122c @xcite or neutrino - proton elastic scattering interactions @xcite . such measurements would require good energy resolution , a significant source of carbon and/or a low energy threshold , for example , a liquid scintillator neutrino detector . we note that even with a liquid scintillator detector , the dominant neutrino interaction is still ibd @xcite . if such a measurement was made , and there is not a significant amount of rotation ( see the discussion on rotation in ) , one can immediately infer the gravitational binding energy of the remnant , since neutrinos carry away the vast majority ( @xmath1231% of the energy is predominantly shared among the kinetic energy of the explosion , the original binding energy of the unbound stellar mantle , and the binding energy of the iron core at the onset of collapse . ] ) of the gravitational binding energy . for typical nuclear eos like the ones considered here , this results in a one - to - one mapping of the released gravitational binding energy to the baryonic mass of the remnant , and , hence , the gravitational mass of the remnant . this is most easily seen by fitting the gravitational binding energy of a cold ( t=0.1mev ) , neutrino - less @xmath103-equilibrium , non - rotating neutron star to its baryonic mass . from cold neutron star tov solutions using the ls220 eos one can obtain an empirical fit to better than 3% above a baryonic mass of 1.15@xmath34 , @xmath124 a similar fit for the hshen eos gives , @xmath125 and is accurate to 5% above baryonic masses of 1.15@xmath34 . below @xmath126 , the empirical quadratic fit is not as accurate . however , all models considered here reach a baryonic protoneutron star mass of 1.15@xmath34 within @xmath510ms of bounce . hence , we believe that the above fits are acceptable for the iron - core core collapse events considered here . we now make the assumption that an explosion launched at a particular postbounce time will result in a neutron star remnant with a baryonic mass equal to the baryonic mass that has accreted through the shock up until the time of the explosion . this neglects any late - time fallback of material onto the protoneutron star which would lead to additional neutrino emission . @xcite and @xcite predict fallback masses @xmath1275 - 10% of the initial protoneutron star remnant mass . we also neglect any asymmetric mass accretion which may occur in the early explosion phase . in , we convert the baryonic mass enclosed by the shock to the _ total _ emitted neutrino energy using and [ eq : ebind_hshen ] . we plot this for all progenitor models ( run with the ls220 eos ) as a function of the hypothetical time of explosion . as a concrete example , consider the situation where 300b ( shown as the dashed line in ) of total neutrino energy was observational inferred . this could correspond ( @xmath128 ) to a progenitor with a high compactness parameter that exploded at an early time , e.g. , model @xmath10240wh07 at 70ms or ( @xmath129 ) to a low progenitor with low compactness parameter that exploded at late times , e.g. , model @xmath10212wh07 at 400ms . if we have an estimate of the explosion time , e.g. , via characteristic features in the neutrino observables , then we can use the combined measurement to probe the progenitor core structure . this is further quantified in , where we choose three total emitted neutrino energies , 250 , 300 , and 350b , and determine the time at which the explosion must have been launched for a given compactness and the respective total emitted energy . we plot this explosion time versus @xmath96 for all models and both eos . in general , for a fixed total emitted energy , as the compactness parameter of the progenitor increases , the explosion time must decrease . for progenitors with high @xmath96 ( @xmath130 ) , there is a clear mapping between the explosion time and the compactness parameter , given a specific total emitted neutrino energy and an eos . as was the case for the total ibd rates , there is some scatter at low @xmath96 ( @xmath131 ) , but there is still an overall trend . , and the baryonic mass enclosed in the shock at any given time . this defines the explosion time to be , in a lagrangian sense , the time at which the outermost final neutron star mass element accretes through the shock . the color coding corresponds to @xmath96 , the color coding is provided in . ] shows that there is a very strong eos dependence . while the baryonic mass inside the shock as a function of postbounce time does not vary strongly with eos , the gravitational binding energy released does . based on the above empirical fits to the gravitational binding energy , the ls220 eos leads to @xmath132 more energy release than the hshen eos for the same baryonic mass . this method of determining the compactness parameter ( by combining an estimate of the explosion time and the total emitted neutrino energy ) can be used together with the methods described above ( using the postbounce , preexplosion ibd rates ) as a consistency check , or to break degeneracies , which we will discuss next in . 14% energy for a given baryonic mass . ] there are a number of degeneracies and uncertainties that may prevent fully conclusive statements regarding the mapping from detected signal to progenitor core structure . these include , nuclear eos , rotation , viewing angle , distance , and neutrino oscillations ( including collective oscillations ) . we will discuss each one of these consecutively and independently , although all may be relevant in a generic situation . _ nuclear eos _ : we have already briefly explored the dependence of the neutrino observables on the nuclear eos by taking two very different eos and comparing the emitted neutrino signal . the total number of interactions predicted to be detected from a given progenitor model varies with eos ( cf . , ) in such a way that a high compactness model paired with the hshen eos produces the same number of interactions as a model with a slightly lower compactness paired with a softer eos , like the ls220 . hence , there is a clear degeneracy between the progenitor compactness and the equation of state . however , a water cherenkov detector will not only detect a given number of ibd interactions , but also their energy distribution . from this distribution , and the detector response , one can work backwards to reconstruct both the emitted average @xmath13 energy and the luminosity . we show in how knowledge of the emitted energy spectrum can break the degeneracy with cumulative emitted @xmath13 energy and eos , provided the distance to the core collapse event is known ( see the discussion of distance uncertainties later in this section ) . for each model and eos , we plot the average @xmath13 energy as a function of cumulative emitted @xmath13 energy at three select postbounce times : 100 , 200 , and 300ms . the data from each of the 32 progenitors fall on a unique line that is parameterized by the compactness . in principle , provided very large statistics and ultimate predictions of neutrino observables , this allows one to break the eos - progenitor degeneracy between eos . in reality , achieving an instantaneous measurement of the neutrino average energy to within a few % will be difficult , and there will likely be a large suite of nuclear eos that could reproduce the observables within error . energy versus cumulative emitted @xmath13 energy each eos and progenitor . this is shown for three postbounce times , 100ms ( left panel ) ; 200ms ( center panel ) ; and 300ms ( right panel ) . solid ( open ) points correspond to the ls220 ( hshen ) eos . the degeneracy between eos and cumulative @xmath13 energy is broken when the average energy is taken into account . we find that is a robust prediction across all progenitors and postbounce preexplosion times . ] _ rotation and viewing angle _ : the effect of rotation on the neutrino signal may be more difficult to disentangle from the effects of progenitor structure . to explore the effect of rotation , we perform 1.5d simulations of rotating core collapse . these simulations treat rotation in a spherically symmetric way , using ` shellular rotation ' @xcite . this approximation only captures the spherically - averaged centrifugal effect of rotation on the matter . as the amount of rotation is increased , the protoneutron star becomes more and more centrifugally supported . increased rotation leads to lower densities and temperatures throughout the protoneutron star . this in turn effects the neutrino signal . in , we plot the @xmath13 luminosities and average @xmath13 energies determined from ` nugr1d ` for 12 rotating core collapse simulations . we use model @xmath10215wh07 paired with the ls220 eos . the initial rotation rate is assigned via @xcite @xmath133^{-1}\times 10^{16}\ \mathrm{cm}^2\ \mathrm{s}^{-1}\,,\label{eq : rotationlaw}\ ] ] where @xmath134 is the radius that encloses 1@xmath34 , which for the @xmath10215wh07 progenitor is 703 km , and @xmath135 is the specific angular momentum at infinity , in units of @xmath136 . we vary @xmath135 from 0 to 3 in increments of 0.25 . for the @xmath10215wh07 progenitor , the initial central angular velocity is @xmath137rads@xmath138 , giving a range of @xmath139 from 0 to 6.08rads@xmath138 . at bounce , the @xmath140rads@xmath138 model has a rotation period of @xmath52.4ms , which decreases nearly linearly with increasing initial @xmath135 . increased rotation leads to the overall reduction of both the @xmath13 luminosity and average energy . for example , with @xmath139 = 0 , 2.03 , 4.05 , and 6.08rads@xmath138 the @xmath13 luminosity at 100ms is @xmath555 , @xmath552 , @xmath540 , and @xmath525bs@xmath138 , respectively . while we do not show the @xmath12 and @xmath20 luminosities and average energies , they follow the @xmath13 trends . the only exception to this is the @xmath12 neutronization burst where rotation in our 1.5d approach does not significantly alter the @xmath12 luminosity . our 1.5d approach to rotation does not capture the anisotropy of the neutrino emission , rather just the angle - averaged value . @xcite considered a model with an initial rotation rate of @xmath141rads@xmath138 , roughly corresponding to our @xmath142 model . they found that the ratio of polar to equatorial luminosity can be as large as 34 and that average neutrino energies in polar regions can be harder by @xmath14312mev than on the equator . we find that it is not possible with the cumulative neutrino signals alone to break the degeneracy between rotation and the progenitor star eos combinations . the angle - averaged @xmath13 luminosity and average energy from a rotating system mimic the @xmath13 luminosity and average energy from a non - rotating system with a progenitor with lower compactness and/or a stiffer eos . in addition , the rotational energy stored in the neutron star remnant can lead to an underestimate of the total emitted neutrino energy , again mimicking a lower - compactness progenitor and/or a stiffer eos . however , all hope is not lost : stellar evolution and current constraints on pulsar birth spins ( e.g. , @xcite ) suggest that most massive stars will be spinning too slowly for rotation to have a strong effect on dynamics and neutrino signal . @xcite , for example , predict a presupernova rotation rate of 0.2rads@xmath138 for a 15@xmath34 star , which is smaller than all rotation rates considered here . if , on the other hand , the progenitor is rapidly spinning , the degeneracy in the neutrino signal may be broken by coincident observations in gravitational waves that are able to constrain the rotation rate of the collapse core @xcite . 15wh07 for various initial central angular velocities . we assign angular momentum to the @xmath10215wh07 progenitor via with values of @xmath135 ranging from 0 to 3 in 0.25 increments . this gives initial central rotation rates of 0 to @xmath56.08 rad s@xmath138 in increments of @xmath50.51 rad s@xmath138 . in our simulations , increased rotation lowers both the neutrino luminosity and the average energy . ] _ distance _ : if the electromagnetic signal is blocked , by , for example , the galactic center , we may not be able to obtain a reliable distance to the supernova . the @xmath13 flux at earth follows an inverse square law , while the spectral distribution will not change over the distances of relevance . this means that degeneracy with distance is also hard to break with the ibd neutrino signal alone for the following reason : a high - compactness progenitor at a large distance can produce the same energy - integrated flux at earth as a low - compactness progenitor . less neutrinos are emitted in the latter but the flux has not been diluted as much due to the closer distance . if the nuclear eos is not known , the observed neutrino flux and energy spectra could be associated with a range of nuclear eos distance combinations . a progenitor at a large distance could produce the same neutrino flux and energy distribution as a lower - compactness progenitor with a softer eos . here , the softer eos , which will give rise to an increased average energy , compensates for the decrease in the average energy produced by the smaller compactness . future constraints on the nuclear eos could break this degeneracy since one could more reliably associate an observed energy distribution with a particular progenitor compactness ( ) . this may even provide a distance estimate , as would a detection of the neutronization burst signal @xcite . it does not show a strong dependence on the progenitor model , but is difficult to detect since the @xmath12 cross sections in water cherenkov detectors are much lower than the ibd cross section , resulting in few interactions . some detector materials have significantly larger @xmath12 cross sections and would be better suited to detect the neutronization burst , such as liquid argon @xcite and lead @xcite . _ neutrino oscillations : _ first , considering only matter - induced neutrino oscillations , in the normal mass hierarchy , the electron antineutrino signal at earth is a composite spectrum of @xmath14470% of the original @xmath13 neutrinos and @xmath14530% of the original @xmath146 spectrum , where @xmath147 is the mixing angle between the mass eigenstates @xmath148 and @xmath149 . in the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy , the entire @xmath13 signal is replaced with the original @xmath150 signal @xcite . in either case , we still expect the total number of ibd interactions to increase with the compactness parameter of the progenitor since both the @xmath13 and the @xmath20 luminosity increase . if the hierarchy of the neutrino mass eigenstates is not determined by neutrino experiments before the next nearby core - collapse supernova , the early postbounce , preexplosion neutrino luminosities may provide an answer @xcite . this relies on the systematically different rise times of the @xmath20 and @xmath13 signals . we also point out a degeneracy in disentangling the spectral properties of the emitted neutrino spectra from the matter - induced oscillated neutrino spectra observed in earth detectors @xcite . much more troublesome are the collective neutrino oscillations that arise from coherent neutrino - neutrino forward scattering . collective oscillations are very sensitive to the energy spectra ( both the distribution and magnitude ) of all neutrino flavors and the background matter density . since the governing equations are highly non - linear , there are currently no simple analytic expressions predicting the neutrino signal at earth based on the output of core - collapse simulations . recent studies suggest that during the early postbounce , preexplosion phase , collective neutrino oscillations may be suppressed @xcite , however the community has not yet reached consensus , see , e.g. , @xcite and @xcite . the next nearby core - collapse supernova will be extremely well observed in neutrinos . super - kamiokande alone will observe @xmath5@xmath151 electron antineutrinos from a typical core - collapse supernova at a fiducial galactic distance of @xmath11 . future detectors of the scale of the proposed hyper - kamiokande may see in excess of @xmath152 interactions . such high - statistics observations will provide rich information on the neutrino signal . comparison with theoretical model predictions will allow to falsify or constrain a broad range of hypotheses in core - collapse supernova astrophysics and nuclear / neutrino physics . unexpected signal features may lead to the discovery of new physics . in this study , our focus has been on the imprint of the progenitor star s structure on the neutrino signal in the postbounce preexplosion phase of core - collapse supernovae . we have carried out a large set of spherically - symmetric radiation - hydrodynamics simulations of core collapse and the early postbounce phase with the goal of studying trends in the neutrino signal with variations in progenitor structure . our results show , in agreement with previous work ( e.g. , @xcite ) , that the @xmath12 signal from the neutronization burst emerging shortly after bounce has very little progenitor dependence , due to the universal nature of homologous inner core collapse . the neutrino signal in the postbounce preexplosion phase is determined primarily by the accretion luminosity of outer iron core , silicon shell , and oxygen shell material . the postbounce accretion rate depends on the inner structure of the progenitor at the presupernova stage . our results show that the preexplosion neutrino signal has an essentially monotonic dependence on progenitor structure described by a single parameter , the compactness @xmath153 ( where @xmath45 is a typical baryonic mass reaching the center over the timescale of interest ) . the greater a progenitor s @xmath46 , the higher are the emitted luminosities and average energies of all neutrino species . scaling in the same way is the total emitted energy in neutrinos over the entire protoneutron star cooling phase for a given explosion time at which accretion is shut off . these trends are robust and independent of the nuclear eos . they are also rather insensitive to the particular choice of the reference mass @xmath45 in @xmath46 as long as it is in the range of typical neutron star baryonic masses ( @xmath5@xmath154 ) and we find @xmath96 to be a good choice . and @xmath20 spectra . the color coded lines denote different progenitors and are generated with ` snowglobes ` based on our simulations with the ls220 eos . more details are provided in the text . we overlay the cumulative detected interactions observed in kamiokande ii from sn 1987a , assuming the first interaction denotes the time of core - bounce . we caution the reader by noting that the very low number statistics make it hard to draw any conclusions regarding the progenitor of sn1987a . ] the monotonic dependence of the preexplosion neutrino emission on progenitor compactness translates directly to the neutrino signal observed by detectors , provided collective neutrino oscillations do not lead to complicated swaps of flavor spectra that brake the dependence of the observed signal on progenitor structure . neutrino observations of the next nearby core collapse event thus may , in principle , allow quantitative constraints on the inner structure of the progenitor star . as an example with real neutrino data , we consider the early postbounce neutrino signal observed from sn 1987a by the kamiokande ii experiment @xcite . of the eleven interactions that were observed , the first four occurred within 323ms of each other . all interactions observed by kamiokande ii are consistent with being ibd interactions @xcite . we assume that the first interaction occurs at the onset of the postbounce phase , although the actual bounce time is likely somewhat earlier . in , we plot the cumulative number of detected interactions observed from sn 1987a in the first 500ms along with the ` snowglobes ` prediction from our simulations with the ls220 eos using a 2.14kt water cherenkov detector at 51.4kpc . we use the efficiencies quoted in @xcite and the smearing matrices from the ` snowglobes ` detector configuration ` wc100kt30prct ` . to show the full range of the possible effects of msw neutrino oscillations , we show the expected number of interactions assuming no oscillations and assuming a complete switch of the @xmath13 and @xmath20 spectra ( as would be the case in the inverted mass hierarchy ; the normal hierarchy is a combination of these two signals ) . during the accretion phase the expected number of detected interactions from an oscillated @xmath20 spectrum can be significantly smaller than the electron - type neutrino luminosity due to the smaller neutrino luminosity in the accretion phase . while the quantitative results obviously depend on neutrino oscillation details , the qualitative trend with @xmath46 is unbroken . comparing our predictions with the interactions observed from sn 1987a one notes ( but must keep the very small - number statistics in mind ) that either the explosion must have occurred early in the postbounce phase and/or the progenitor must have had a relatively low @xmath96 . stated another way , that data strongly disfavors a late - time explosion in a high compactness model . both of these statements are broadly consistent with the previous work of @xcite and @xcite . it is also not inconsistent with the proposed zams mass of @xmath5@xmath155 for sanduleak @xmath156 @xmath157 ( e.g. , @xcite ) , the blue supergiant progenitor star of sn 1987a . however , the mapping between zams mass and stellar structure ( i.e. , compactness ) at the presupernova stage appears to be highly non - monotonic ( cf . [ fig : xis ] ; @xcite ) . this makes it very difficult to link the observed neutrino signal to zams mass without additional constraints from classical astronomical observations in the electromagnetic spectrum . in the discussion of sn 1987a , we have ignored uncertainties regarding nuclear eos , rotation of the progenitor core , distance , and collective neutrino oscillations . all affect the preexplosion neutrino signature in ways that may be degenerate with variations in the compactness parameter . however , as we have shown , large variations in the stiffness of the nuclear eos in the density and temperature regime relevant in the preexplosion phase can be disentangled from @xmath46 via observations of the emitted neutrino spectrum . rapid rotation , which decreases both ( angle - averaged ) luminosities and average neutrino energies , can be constrained by gravitational wave observations of a galactic event ( e.g. , @xcite ) . distance uncertainties from electromagnetic observations , which translate into uncertainties in the absolute luminosities , can be reduced by exploiting the generic neutronization burst as a standard candle @xcite . collective neutrino oscillations are not yet fully understood and have not been directly incorporated in neutrino radiation - hydrodynamics simulations . they may lead to one or multiple energy - dependent swaps of spectra between flavors and could thus complicate the mapping between neutrino signal and compactness parameter . however , the recent understanding suggests that collective oscillations may not be significant in the preexplosion phase ( @xcite ; but : @xcite and @xcite ) . our goal with this study was to highlight overall trends of the preexplosion neutrino signal with progenitor structure in the limit of spherical symmetry . we expect these overall trends to be robust and to carry over to the multi - dimensional case . we did not aim at making precise and robust quantitative predictions for any individual model . these are not possible with our current spherically - symmetric radiation - hydrodynamics treatment , which neglects inelastic scattering , redshift and velocity dependent terms ( e.g. , @xcite ) . rotation is included only in an angle - averaged manner and other important multi - dimensional dynamics , in particular convection and the standing - accretion shock instability @xcite , can not be captured . future work to remove these limitations will be necessary to produce the reliable signal predictions necessary for drawing quantitative conclusions from neutrino observations of the next nearby core - collapse supernova . however , even with fully realistic and complete simulation codes , large parameter studies will be necessary to account for prevailing uncertainties in the nuclear eos and/or neutrino interaction physics . we acknowledge helpful discussions with and input from john beacom , adam burrows , luc dessart , ken nomoto , ryan patterson , kate scholberg , mark vagins , and stan woosley . cdo thanks the kavli institute for the physics and mathematics of the universe for hospitality while work on a draft of this article was carried out . the computations were performed at caltech s center for advanced computing research on the cluster `` zwicky '' funded through nsf grant no . phy-0960291 and the sherman fairchild foundation . furthermore , computations were performed on louisiana optical network infrastructure computer systems under allocation loni_numrel06 , on the nsf xsede network under allocation tg - phy100033 , and on resources of the national energy research scientific computing center , which is supported by the office of science of the u.s . department of energy under contract no . de - ac02 - 05ch11231 . eoc is supported in part by a post - graduate fellowship from the natural sciences and engineering research council of canada ( nserc ) . this research is supported in part by the national science foundation under grant nos . ast-0855535 and oci-0905046 , by the alfred p. sloan foundation , and by the sherman fairchild foundation . , a. , beroz , f. , carr , r. , duan , h. , friedland , a. , kaiser , n. , kneller , j. , moss , a. , reitzner , d. , scholberg , k. , webber , d. , & wendell , r. 2011 , snowglobes , revision 1373 , http://www.phy.duke.edu/~schol/snowglobes/ Abstract:
[ "we perform spherically - symmetric general - relativistic simulations of core collapse and the postbounce preexplosion phase in 32 presupernova stellar models of solar metallicity with zero - age - main - sequence masses of @xmath0 to @xmath1 . using energy - dependent three - species neutrino transport in the two - moment approximation with an analytic closure , we show that the emitted neutrino luminosities and spectra follow very systematic trends that are correlated with the compactness ( @xmath2 ) of the progenitor star s inner regions via the accretion rate in the preexplosion phase . we find that these qualitative trends depend only weakly on the nuclear equation of state , but quantitative observational statements will require independent constraints on the equation of state and the rotation rate of the core as well as a more complete understanding of neutrino oscillations . we investigate the simulated response of water cherenkov detectors to the electron antineutrino fluxes from our models and find that the large statistics of a galactic core collapse event may allow robust conclusions on the inner structure of the progenitor star ." ]
13,929
13,929
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the semiclassical quantisation of non - integrable systems using properties of their periodic orbits was triggered by m. gutzwiller @xcite and extended by several groups @xcite . it allows one to express the oscillating part @xmath7 of the quantum - mechanical density of states , given exactly in terms of a quantum spectrum @xmath8 and separated into two terms by g(e ) = _ n ( e - e_n ) = g(e)+g(e ) , [ gqm ] through a semiclassical trace formula of the form g_sc(e ) _ po a_po(e ) [ s_po(e)/-_po/2 ] . [ dgsc ] the sum is over all periodic orbits @xmath9 of the classical system , @xmath10 are their action integrals , the amplitudes @xmath11 depend on their stabilities and degeneracies , and @xmath12 are some phases called maslov indices . the average part @xmath13 of the density of states , which by definition varies smoothly with energy , is obtained by the extended thomas - fermi ( etf ) model ( see , e.g. , @xcite , chapter 4 ) . then , the sum @xmath14 usually turns out to be a good approximation to the exact quantity , although the sum over the @xmath15 in is only an asymptotic one , correct to leading order in @xmath16 , and in chaotic systems is hampered by convergence problems @xcite . for integrable systems , berry and tabor @xcite and later creagh @xcite showed how a trace formula of the form can quite generally be obtained from the einstein - brillouin - keller ( ebk ) quantisation @xcite . this method will be used in the present paper for a spherical system . the semiclassical theory , often referred to as periodic orbit theory ( pot ) , has been very successful not only in ( partial ) quantisation of a given hamiltonian , but also in interpreting many experimentally observable quantum oscillations in finite fermion systems so - called `` shell effects '' in terms of classical mechanics . examples are atomic nuclei @xcite , metallic clusters @xcite , semiconductor quantum dots @xcite , and metallic nanowires @xcite . an overview over many aspects of the pot and illustrative applications are given in @xcite . one problem that remains with all the trace formulae developed in the work quoted above is that the amplitudes @xmath17 diverge in situations where a continuous symmetry is broken or restored under the variation of a system parameter ( which may also be the energy @xmath18 ) , or where bifurcations of periodic orbits occur . in such situations one has to go beyond the stationary phase approximation which is underlying the semiclassical approach . this has , besides @xcite , been developed most systematically by ozorio de almeida and hannay @xcite for both situations , leading to local uniform approximations with finite amplitudes @xmath17 . so - called global uniform approximations , which yield finite amplitudes at symmetry - breaking and bifurcation points and far from them go over into the standard ( extended ) gutzwiller trace formula , were developed for the breaking of u(1 ) symmetry in @xcite , for some cases of u(2 ) and so(3 ) symmetry breaking in @xcite , and for various types of bifurcations in @xcite . ( details and further references may be found in @xcite , chapter 6.3 . ) in this paper we investigate an anharmonically perturbed three - dimensional spherical harmonic oscillator ( ho ) hamiltonian ( for a particle with mass @xmath19 ) : h ( , ) = 12p^2 + 12 ^ 2 r^2 + 14r^4 = h_0(r , p ) + h(r ) , [ hpert ] where @xmath20 and @xmath21 are the absolute values of the three - dimensional momentum and radius vectors . @xmath22 is the strength of the perturbation which first is assumed to be small , but later may assume arbitrary positive values . the unperturbed ho system has u(3 ) symmetry @xcite which is broken by the anharmonic term , leading to the so(3 ) symmetry of the perturbed spherical system . the hamiltonian suggested itself in a recent study @xcite of harmonically trapped fermionic atoms with a short - range repulsive two - body interaction , treated self - consistently in the hartree - fock approximation . as a result , very pronounced shell effects in the total energy @xmath23 of the interacting system as a function of the number @xmath24 of atoms were found , which remind about the so - called super - shells predicted @xcite and observed @xcite in metallic clusters . in a first attempt to interpret these shell effects semiclassically @xcite , we parameterised the self - consistent mean field of the interacting system by the hamiltonian and applied the semiclassical perturbation theory of creagh @xcite to explain qualitatively the shell structure of the hf results . in the present paper we describe some of the mathematical details of the semiclassical perturbation theory for the symmetry breaking u(3 ) @xmath25 so(3 ) and develop a uniform trace formula valid for arbitrary strengths @xmath1 in the hamiltonian . in section [ secpert ] we present the perturbative trace formula for the density of states which is valid in the limit of small @xmath1 and has been presented shortly in @xcite . it already puts the dominance of the shortest periodic orbits , namely the circles and diameters , into evidence . although their individual contributions to the perturbative trace formula diverge in the limit @xmath26 , their sum restores to the unperturbed ho trace formula with u(3 ) symmetry in this limit , which at the same time is the limit of zero energy . in section [ secuni ] we develop the uniform trace formula that includes the contributions of the diameter and circle orbits for arbitrary values of @xmath1 . for this purpose , we start from the ebk quantisation of an arbitrary system with spherical symmetry and apply the poisson summation formula . we obtain a one - dimensional trace integral for the semiclassical density of states , whose end - point contributions correspond to the diameter and circle orbits , valid for an arbitrary spherical one - body potential . for the hamiltonian , the gross - shell structure of the density of states is at low energies always dominated by the families of diameter and circle orbits , although these orbit families only have a two - fold degeneracy . at sufficiently high energies and repetition numbers , `` rational tori '' with frequency ratios @xmath27 with @xmath28 bifurcate from the circle orbits with repetition numbers @xmath29 , as discussed in section [ sectori ] . these rational tori have the highest ( three - fold ) degeneracy possible in a three - dimensional spherical system , but due to their length they only affect the finer quantum structures of the density of states . this situation is completely different from that of a spherical billiard @xcite where the contribution of the diameter orbits to the density of states is practically negligible . in the limit @xmath30 , becomes a purely quartic oscillator which in many respects is easier to handle . in particular , in this limit the system acquires the `` scaling property '' that its classical dynamics becomes independent of the energy which can be absorbed by a rescaling of coordinates and time . this limit will be discussed separately in section [ secquart ] . one interesting classical aspect is that no bifurcations of the circle orbits occur . the same rational tori , which bifurcate from the circle orbit in the perturbed ho system , exist here at all energies . but , again , they affect only the finer quantum structures of the density of states , while its gross - shell structure is largely dominated by the circles and diameters . in the appendices [ app1 ] - [ app3 ] , we collect some mathematical details about the integration over the manifolds @xmath2p@xmath3 and s@xmath31 and some explicit analytical expressions for action integrals and periods in terms of elliptic integrals . finally , in the appendix [ appothers ] , we re - derive from our general trace integral the known trace formulae for two popular spherical systems : the spherical billiard and the coulomb potential . we first write down the exact density of states of the unperturbed three - dimensional harmonic oscillator ( ho ) , given by the hamiltonian h_0(r , p ) = 12 p^2 + 12 ^ 2 r^2 . [ hho ] its quantum - mechanical density of states can be written in the form g_0(e ) = _ n=0^d_n ( e - e_n ) = g_0^etf(e ) + g_0(e ) , [ gsum ] using the spectrum @xmath32 with the degeneracy factor @xmath33 . here @xmath34 is the smooth part given by the etf model g_0^etf(e ) = , [ getfho ] and @xmath35 is the oscillating part given by the following exact trace formula @xcite g_0(e ) = 2g_0^etf(e)_k=1^(-1)^k ( 2k ) = 2g_0^etf(e)_k=1^(-1)^k . [ dg3ho ] it can be understood as a sum over all periodic orbits of the system . hereby @xmath36 represents the repetition number of the primitive classical periodic orbit which has the action @xmath37 . keeping only the leading tf term of @xmath34 in , the density of states can also be written in the form g_0(e ) = e _ -^(-1)^ke^i2ke/ + o(^-1 ) , [ g3hoc ] since the imaginary parts cancel upon summation . note that the smooth tf part in comes from the contribution with @xmath38 in . next we follow creagh @xcite by writing the perturbed trace formula in the form g_pert(e ) = e _ -^(-1)^k m(k/)e^i2ke/ , [ gpert ] where @xmath39 is a modulation factor that takes into account the lowest - order perturbation of the action of the ho orbits . here @xmath40 is a small action that , quite generally , depends on @xmath1 and the energy @xmath18 . the factor in front of the sum in takes into account only the leading term of the smooth part @xmath34 ; this is consistent with the fact that the perturbation theory only deals with the terms of leading order in @xmath41 of the semiclassical trace formula . as we will see in section [ secqm ] , the contributions of terms of relative order @xmath42 in @xmath34 are , indeed , negligible . as described in detail in @xcite , one obtains @xmath39 from an integration of a perturbative phase function over the manifold that describes the classical degeneracy of the ho orbits . the unperturbed ho has u(3 ) symmetry , so that @xmath39 is formally obtained by the average ( k/ ) = e^iks(o)/_ou(3 ) , [ mav ] where @xmath43 is an element of the group u(3 ) characterising a member of the unperturbed ho orbit family , and @xmath44 is the lowest - order primitive action shift brought about by the perturbation @xmath45 in . in the present case @xmath44 is nonzero already in first - order perturbation theory and therefore @xmath46 is proportional to @xmath1 . we need , however , not integrate over the full nine - dimensional space of group elements of u(3 ) . it is sufficient to consider only the subset of symmetry operations which transform the orbits within a given degenerate family into each other ( without changing their actions ) . the dimension of this subset is the degree of degeneracy @xmath47 of that family . for the three - dimensional spherical ho we have @xmath48 . this can most easily be seen by the following argument which also will allow us to find a suitable parametrisation for the four - fold integration . the full phase space is six - dimensional ; due to energy conservation it is reduced to a five - dimensional energy shell which has the topology of a five - sphere s@xmath31 . of the five parameters that specify a point on s@xmath31 , one can be chosen as a trivial time shift along the periodic orbits corresponding to a simple phase factor @xmath49 . this parameter forms a subgroup u(1 ) , so that its elimination restricts us to the four - dimensional manifold ( see appendix [ app1 ] for its mathematical definition ) s^5/u(1 ) = ^2 , [ coset ] which is neither a four - torus nor a four - sphere @xcite . ( note that for the two - dimensional ho one is led to the manifold @xmath2p@xmath50 which happens to be homomorphous to the two - sphere s@xmath3 , see @xcite . ) a suitable parametrisation of @xmath2p@xmath3 is given in appendix [ app1 ] in terms of four angles @xmath51 whose meaning will become clear in a moment . the modulation factor therefore becomes ( k/ ) = d_^2 e^iks/ = _ 0^ d _ 0^ ^3d _ 0 ^ 2 d_2 _ 0 ^ 2 d_3 e^iks(,,_2,_3)/. [ mfac ] in the zero - perturbation limit @xmath26 , where the action shift @xmath52 and hence also @xmath46 is zero , the modulation factor becomes unity , as it should for to approach . next we have to determine the action shift @xmath52 of a primitive periodic orbit of the ho , caused by the perturbation @xmath53 . the harmonic solutions of the classical equations of motion of the unperturbed system are well known : x_i = ( t+_i ) , i=1,2,3 ( x_1,x_2,x_3)=(x , y , z ) . [ xi ] hereby @xmath54 are the three conserved energies in the three dimensions . depending on the values of @xmath54 and the phases @xmath55 , describes circles , ellipses or librations through the origin ; we will in the following call the latter the `` diameter orbits '' . we now re - parameterise the @xmath56 in the following way : x(t ) = rn_1(t),y(t ) = rn_2(t+_2),z(t ) = rn_3(t+_3 ) , [ xi3d ] where @xmath57 , and @xmath58 is given by r=/,e = e_1+e_2+e_3 . since the @xmath59 must lie on the sphere @xmath60 , due to the conservation of energy , we can also write them as : n_1 = , n_2 = , n_3 = . [ s2par ] actually , since the @xmath61 must be restricted to positive definite values in order to cover once all classically allowed values of the @xmath62 , we only have to integrate over the first octant of s@xmath3 , so that @xmath63 $ ] . the four angles @xmath64 , with their ranges of definition , are precisely the parameters describing the manifold @xmath2p@xmath3 as explained in appendix [ app1 ] , and the correct integration measure is that used in . we might have kept the phase angle @xmath65 of @xmath66 in , too ; integration over it is tantamount to a trivial integration over time along the orbits . the resulting five - dimensional integral becomes equivalent to that over the s@xmath31 sphere discussed in appendix [ app2 ] . according to creagh @xcite , the first - order action shift brought about by a perturbation @xmath67 is given by _ 1 s = - _ po h(t ) dt , where @xmath15 stands for a particular member of the unperturbed periodic orbit family , and the perturbating hamiltonian @xmath68 has to be evaluated along the periodic orbit . inserting - into the perturbation @xmath69 leads to elementary integrals over powers of the trigonometric functions . the result is _ 1 s(,,_2,_3 ) & = & -(3r^4 - 4l^2/^2 ) = -(3e^2-^2l^2 ) + & = & -[3-^2(2 ) ( ^2 ^ 2_2+^2 ^ 2_3 ) -^4 ^ 2(2)^2(_2-_3 ) ] , [ ds3d ] where @xmath70 is the conserved squared angular momentum , and the first - order action unit @xmath46 is given by = e^2/4 ^ 5 . [ sigma ] the integral , with the function given in , has been integrated numerically and found to be identical with the corresponding five - dimensional integral over the 5-sphere s@xmath31 , expressing @xmath71 in terms of the five hyperspherical angles of the six - dimensional polar coordinates ( cf . appendix [ app2 ] ) . however , even the four - dimensional integration in is more than needed . in fact , the same result is obtained if we replace the phase function under the @xmath2p@xmath3 integration as follows : _ 1 s(,,_2,_3 ) _ 1 s ( ) = -(3-^2 ) . [ ds3da ] the integrals over @xmath72 , @xmath73 and @xmath74 then become trivial and the result is found ( with @xmath75 ) to be ( k/ ) & = & 2 _ 0^ d e^-ik(3-^2)/ = _ 0 ^ 1 dze^-ik(3-z)/ = . [ modfex ] the replacement is not obviously justifiable in a direct way , but a suitable reduction of the five - dimensional s@xmath31 integral yields exactly the integral , as demonstrated in appendix [ app2 ] . identically the same result is also obtained independently from the ebk quantisation of the perturbed hamiltonian using poisson summation and keeping only first - order terms in @xmath1 ; it is given in eq . at the end of sect . [ secpois ] . the form of the modulation factor suggests a simple physical interpretation : the resulting two terms correspond to two separate families of orbits that survive the breaking of the u(3 ) symmetry . as we will see below , these are the circle and the diameter orbits with maximal and minimal ( i.e. , zero ) angular momentum , respectively , at fixed energy . for @xmath76 these are actually the shortest periodic orbits found in the perturbed system . in contrast to the four - fold degenerate unperturbed ho orbits , they only have a two - fold degeneracy , since only rotations about two of the euler angles change their orientation . in general , the most degenerate periodic orbits in a three - dimensional system with spherical symmetry so(3 ) can be rotated about three euler angles . however , for each of the circle and diameter orbits one of the three rotations is redundant in the sense that it maps these orbits onto themselves : for the circles , it is the in - plane rotation around their centre , and for the diameters , it is the rotation about their own axis of motion . the loss of two degrees of degeneracy of these two orbit types with respect to the unperturbed ho orbits appears in the form of the factor @xmath77 in their amplitudes in , in agreement with the general counting of the powers of @xmath77 in semiclassical amplitudes @xcite . we will see in the next section that for values @xmath78 and large enough values of @xmath1 , there exist fully three - fold degenerate orbits , namely orbits with rational ratios @xmath79 of radial and angular frequencies with @xmath80 . they are created at bifurcations of the @xmath36-the repetitions of the circle orbits with @xmath81 . this happens , however , only at finite values of @xmath1 , so that these orbits do not contribute in the limit @xmath26 . inserting into , we find the following perturbed trace formula for the oscillating part of the level density : g_pert(e ) & = & _ k=1^ + & = & _ k=1^ , [ dgp ] where @xmath82 and @xmath83 are the perturbed primitive actions of the diameters and the circle , respectively : s_d = s_0 - 3 , s_c = s_0 - 2,s_0=2e/. [ sorbits ] these values will be confirmed from the general expressions derived in the next section . the perturbative trace formula uniformly restores the oscillating part of the exact ho trace formula in the limit @xmath26 . in section [ secqm ] we will test its range of validity comparing against quantum - mechanical results . note that as is usual in perturbation theory the semiclassical amplitudes and actions of the orbits contributing to are correct only in the small-@xmath1 limit . in general , one has to generalise the perturbative trace formula to a uniform version that , in the limit of large perturbation , goes over into the corresponding ( extended ) gutzwiller trace formula . this uniformisation has been done for the breaking of u(1 ) symmetry in @xcite , and for some cases of u(2 ) symmetry breaking in @xcite ; one of the latter result applies , with suitable changes , also to some cases of so(3 ) @xmath25 u(1 ) symmetry breaking . the symmetry breaking u(3 ) @xmath25 so(3 ) under study here has not been treated in the literature so far . however , the simplicity of our above results makes the uniformisation particularly easy in the present case : since the modulation factor already has its own asymptotic form or , inversely speaking : since the asymptotic expansion of the integral in in the limit of large @xmath46 happens to be exact also for @xmath84 it will be sufficient to replace in the perturbed actions @xmath82 , @xmath83 and their semiclassical amplitudes by those valid for all values of @xmath1 , which will be derived in the next section . in this section we will calculate the full actions and semiclassical amplitudes of the diameter and circle orbits of the hamiltonian , valid for arbitrary values of @xmath1 . the general trace formula for an arbitrary spherical potential in three dimensions has been given by creagh and littlejohn @xcite . we choose a different approach here , which is in spirit that of berry and tabor @xcite , but goes beyond their leading - order approximation in taking into account the end - point corrections to a trace integral which yield precisely the circle and diameter orbit contributions . the classical hamiltonian of the system ( with mass @xmath19 ) h ( , ) = e = 12p^2 + v(r ) , v(r ) = 12 ^ 2 r^2 + 14 r^4 , [ hrad ] is integrable due to the spherical symmetry of the potential , so that we can apply the standard ebk ( or radial wkb ) approximation to it . writing @xmath85 in terms of polar coordinates @xmath86 and the associated canonical momenta @xmath87 , we have the usual form involving an effective potential @xmath88 that includes a centrifugal term : e = h(r , p_r , l ) = 12 p_r^2 + v_eff(r ) , v_eff(r ) = v(r ) + , [ heff ] where @xmath89 is the radial momentum . the three independent ( and poisson - commuting ) constants of the motion are the energy @xmath18 , the total angular momentum @xmath90 , and its @xmath91 component @xmath92 . the momentum @xmath93 can be expressed in terms of the latter two as p_= . [ pthet ] before we specialise to our particular potential @xmath94 in , we briefly recall the radial ebk quantisation and derive from it a general trace formula for an arbitrary spherical potential , starting from the hamiltonian . in the standard radial ebk method @xcite , one quantises the three following action integrals s_r & = & p_rdr = 2(n_r+1/2 ) , n_r = 0,1,2, [irad ] + i _ & = & p_d= ( n_+1/2 ) , n_= 0,1,2, [ithet ] + i _ & = & l_z = m , m=0,1,2, [iphi ] where the maslov index 1/2 in is correct only for smooth potentials . since @xmath93 in does not depend on the potential , the integral for @xmath95 can be done once for all and yields i_= l-|l_z| 0 , [ ithet1 ] so that the quantisation condition for @xmath96 is given by l = ( n_+|m|+1/2 ) = ( + 1/2 ) , = n_+|m|=0,1,2 , [ lquant ] in terms of a single angular momentum quantum number @xmath97 . the relation includes the so - called langer correction ; the quantised squared angular momentum @xmath98 agrees with the exact quantum - mechanical value @xmath99 in the limit of large @xmath97 . solving for @xmath89 , we can write the radial action as s_r(e , l ) = dr = 2(n_r+1/2 ) , [ irad1 ] showing that the quantised energies will only depend on the radial and angular momentum quantum numbers @xmath100 and @xmath97 ; they have , of course , the usual @xmath101-degeneracy @xmath102 , since @xmath103 . inverting the relation , we may rewrite the hamiltonian in the form e = ( s_r , l ) . [ ham ] inserting the right - hand side of and into , we obtain the ebk - quantised eigenenergies : e_n_r^ebk = ( 2(n_r+1/2),(+1/2 ) ) , , n_r = 0,1,2, [eebk ] they can in general only be obtained by numerical iteration after doing the radial action integral over @xmath104 within the classical turning points . before continuing , we simplify the situation by a scaling of the energy . in principle we have to vary the three parameters @xmath18 , @xmath105 , and @xmath1 to study the dynamics of our present system . however , we can introduce a scaling of the energy in such a way that the classical dynamics only depends on one single parameter , a dimensionless scaled energy @xmath106 . if we multiply by the factor @xmath107 , we can write the r.h.s . in terms of scaled coordinates @xmath108 and momenta @xmath109 and a scaled time @xmath110 : q_i = x_i,_i = p_i , = t , [ scal ] so that the scaled energy @xmath106 becomes e = e = 12**^2+v(q ) = 12q^2+v(q)+ , v(q)=12q^2 + 14q^4 . [ escal ] where the dimensionless scaled angular momentum @xmath111 is given by l = l / s , s = . [ sscal ] in @xmath112 is the scaled radial variable and @xmath113 the scaled radial momentum , and the dot means the derivative with respect to the scaled time @xmath110 . @xmath114 is the action unit . this brings about a considerable simplification of the classical dynamics : we only need to vary one parameter @xmath106 ; at the end of our calculations we just have to remember that energies are measured in units of @xmath115 , angular momentum and actions in units of @xmath116 , times in units of @xmath117 , etc . in the following we shall give all quantities as functions of the dimensionless scaled variables @xmath106 and @xmath111 . ( other scaled dimensionless quantities such as actions , periods etc . will be denoted by lower - case letters . ) the scaling in is specific for our present hamiltonian . it can , however , easily be modified for ho potentials perturbed by arbitrary central potentials which are pure power laws in @xmath112 . the results of this subsection can therefore easily be generalized to the corresponding suitably scaled potentials @xmath118 . we now take the spectrum as a starting point to write down the density of states in the ebk approximation : g_ebk(e ) = _ n_r=0^_=0^ ( 2 + 1)(e - e_n_r^ebk ) . [ gebk ] next we apply poisson summation @xcite to convert the sums over @xmath100 and @xmath97 into integrals : g_ebk(e ) = _ n=-^_m=-^ _ 0^d ( 2 + 1 ) _ 0^dn_r ( e - e_n_r^ebk ) e^i2(nn_r+m ) + [ gebk1 ] due to the finite lower limits of the summations in , there are boundary corrections to , which we have indicated by the dots . we shall comment on them in a moment . using and , we substitute the variables @xmath97 and @xmath100 by the classical actions @xmath96 and @xmath119 , using @xmath120 and @xmath121 . then @xmath122 becomes , expressed in terms of the dimensionless scaled variables , g_ebk(e ) = _ n=-^ _ m=-^_0^l_m(e ) dl2l _ 0^s_r(e , l ) ds_r(e-(s_r , l ) ) e^is[ns_r+2ml]/-i(n+m ) + [ gebk2 ] hereby @xmath123 is the scaled radial action integral and @xmath124 the scaled hamiltonian . note that the integration limits have been imposed by the energy conservation ; @xmath125 is the maximum scaled angular momentum at fixed energy . the lower limits are , strictly speaking , @xmath126 for the integral over @xmath111 and @xmath127 for the integral over @xmath128 . replacing them by zero corresponds to neglecting corrections of higher order in @xmath77 . in the following , we keep terms up to order @xmath77 with respect to the leading factor @xmath129 in . there are exactly two corrections of relative order @xmath77 in what is indicated by the dots above : one is a boundary correction from @xmath130 to , and the second is coming from the lower limit @xmath131 of the @xmath128 integral in . a short calculation shows that these two corrections cancel identically . all other terms neglected in correspond to corrections of relative order @xmath42 or higher . we now use the relations ( e-(s_r , l ) ) = |s_r(e , l)|(s_r - s_r(e , l ) ) and s_r(e , l ) = = t_r(e , l ) . here @xmath132 is the scaled period of the classical motion at fixed values of @xmath106 and @xmath111 , which is the energy derivative of the corresponding scaled action integral @xmath133 : s_r(e , l ) & = & _ q(e , l)dq = 2_q_1^q_2 dq , [ srad ] + t_r(e , l ) & = & = 2_q_1^q_2 dq . [ trad ] here @xmath134 and @xmath135 are the scaled lower and upper turning points of the radial motion , respectively , which both depend on @xmath106 and @xmath111 . the above integrals can in many cases be expressed in terms of complete elliptic integrals . ( exceptions are the ho and coulomb potentials where they become simple algebraic functions of @xmath106 and @xmath111 . ) for our present potential @xmath118 in , the analytical expressions for , and other quantities of interest are given in the appendix [ app3 ] . one important result derived there is the taylor expansion of @xmath133 around @xmath136 , whose first terms are s_r(e , l ) = s_r(e,0 ) - l + a(e)l^2 + o(l^3 ) , [ srltay ] where @xmath137 is given in . the structure of but not the explicit form of @xmath137 appears to be a general result valid for all regular central potentials @xmath118 with a minimum at @xmath138 ( and hence not for the coulomb potential , see appendix [ appcoul ] ) , but we were not able to prove it in the general case . the relevance of the linear term @xmath139 in will become clear in the next subsection . using the above relations we can now do the integral over @xmath128 in exactly , due to the delta function , and obtain the following `` ebk trace integral '' : g_ebk(e ) = _ n=-^ _ m=-^(-1)^n+m _ 0^l_m(e ) dllt_r(e , l ) e^i[ns_r(e , l)+2msl]/ + o(^-1 ) . [ gebkint ] the phase of the integrand of can be interpreted as the full action @xmath140 , divided by @xmath77 , of a given classical orbit labelled by @xmath141 and @xmath24 , consisting of the radial part @xmath142 and the angular part @xmath143 . when doing the full double summation over all @xmath141 and @xmath24 and the integration over @xmath111 exactly , yields the ebk spectrum to leading order in @xmath77 . note that the limits of the @xmath111 integral are the cases of zero angular momentum , which corresponds to the diameter orbits , and its maximum value @xmath125 at a given energy , which corresponds to the circle orbits . the latter have the radius @xmath144 at which the effective scaled potential @xmath145 has its minimum ; for this motion the radial action is zero : @xmath146 , since all energy is in the angular motion . all contributions with @xmath147 to the integral correspond to motion which has both radial and angular components . the formula , valid for arbitrary ( but correctly scaled ) spherical potentials @xmath118 with smooth walls , is in principle a trace formula , but it does not yet have its characteristic form . that form is obtained by evaluating the integral over @xmath111 in the semiclassical limit @xmath148 by evaluating its leading contributions from the critical points of the phase function @xmath149 in the exponent of the integrand . to leading order in @xmath77 , these are stationary points as far as they exist . using the standard stationary - phase evaluation of the integral around the stationary points , one obtains contributions to @xmath122 with amplitudes proportional to @xmath150 , as expected for the fully three - fold degenerate orbits in a spherical system ( cf . the discussion at the end of the previous section ) . next to leading order in @xmath77 , one obtains contributions from the end points of the integral ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) , sometimes referred to as `` edge corrections '' . as already announced above and shown explicitly below , these correspond here to the diameter and circular orbits , giving contributions with amplitudes proportional to @xmath151 . a special contribution to @xmath122 comes from @xmath152 . as generally proved by berry and mount @xcite , this must be the thomas - fermi ( tf ) value of the density of states , which is the leading contribution to its smooth part . from we obtain with @xmath152 g_ebk^(0)(e ) = _ 0^l_m(e)dl^2 t_r(e , l ) . [ tfint ] the integral of over @xmath153 is straightforward . note that the contribution from the upper limit @xmath125 in is zero , since the turning points coincide : @xmath154 . the result is g_ebk^(0)(e ) = _ 0^q_2 ^ 0q^2dq = g_tf(e ) . [ gtf ] here @xmath155 is the upper turning point for @xmath136 . ( the lower one is zero : @xmath156 . ) that really is equal to the tf density of states follows from its general definition g_tf(e ) = d^3p d^3r ( e- ( , ) ) = d^3 d^3q ( e- ( , * ) ) . using polar coordinates for @xmath157 and @xmath158 and doing the @xmath158 integration leads to . the analytical expression valid for the potential is given in . in the introduction we have stated that the average part of the density of states is generally given by the etf approximation which contains @xmath77 corrections to the tf limit . for the spherical three - dimensional ho , these corrections are of relative order @xmath42 , as seen in . for the present perturbed ho potential we will see that the tf approximation is sufficient to reproduce the average part of the quantum - mechanical density of states , at least up to the energies for which the quantum spectrum is numerically available . * the stationary condition for the phase function in at a point @xmath159 reads [ ns_r(e , l)+2ml]|_l_nm = n|_l_nm+2m= 0 . [ stat ] due to energy conservation we may write de = d(s_r , l ) = |_l ds_r + |_s_r dl= 0 , so that = -2 , [ dsrdl ] where the frequencies of angular and radial motion are defined as usual by _ ( e , l ) = , _ r(e , l ) = 2 . with this , the stationary condition becomes = = , [ tori ] which is the periodicity condition for the `` rational tori '' as the most degenerate classical orbits @xcite . clearly , @xmath24 and @xmath141 must have the same sign , since frequencies and periods are positive quantities . because of , the lower integration limit @xmath136 in is a stationary point corresponding to the diameter orbit with @xmath160 . however , the stationary - phase integration of for @xmath161 yields a zero contribution due to the factor @xmath111 in the integrand , so that the only semiclassical contribution due to the diameter orbits is the end - point correction for @xmath136 discussed in the next section . as we shall see further below , solutions of with @xmath162 do not exist for all energies @xmath106 and for all pairs @xmath163 of integers . therefore we postpone the contributions of the rational tori to and concentrate first on the diameter and circle orbits . before developing the corresponding trace formula for our present system , valid to all orders in @xmath1 , we want to establish here the connection to the first - order perturbative approach used in sect . [ secpert ] . from the taylor expansions given in appendix [ app3 ] , we obtain for the radial action integral the following first terms : 2s_r(e , l ) = 2(-l ) -(3e^2-^2l^2 ) + o(^2 ) . [ srad1 ] in the second term we recognise precisely the first - order action shift given in . inserting into it @xmath164 and the leading - order expression for @xmath165 given in , we obtain the first - order action shifts of the diameter and circle orbits , respectively , given in . we now insert into the expression for the density of states , neglecting the terms of higher order in @xmath1 and keeping only the zero - order terms in the amplitude of @xmath166 , given in , and of the upper integration limit @xmath165 . noting furthermore that for the unperturbed ho orbits the ratio @xmath167 becomes equal to 2 , so that the resonance condition implies @xmath168 , we assume for the moment that all other combinations of @xmath24 and @xmath141 in this limit may be neglected . writing @xmath169 , we obtain the following result for the density of states up to first order in @xmath1 ( note that the linear terms in @xmath96 cancel in the exponent of the integrand ) : g_ebk^(1)(e ) = _ k=-^(-1)^k e^i2ke/ _ 0^e/ dl^2 e^-ik(3-^2l^2/e^2)]/ , [ gebkp ] where @xmath46 is the quantity defined in . using the substitution @xmath170 , the above integral becomes identically equal to the integral for the perturbative modulation factor , and the result is precisely the perturbed density of states defined in with the oscillating part given in . rather than proving at this stage that all contributions to with @xmath171 either cancel or are negligible to the leading order in @xmath77 , we now go on to derive the full trace formula for the diameter and circle orbits , doing the summations over all @xmath24 and @xmath141 exactly in the semiclassical limit . equipped with the above results , we are now in a position to evaluate the full trace formula for the contribution of diameter and circle orbits for our present hamiltonian . the smooth tf part of the level density , @xmath172 , is given explicitly in the appendix [ app3 ] . the contributions of the rational tori , which bifurcate from the circle orbits only for high enough energy and repetition numbers , will be discussed in section [ sectori ] . we therefore now evaluate the end - point contributions to the integral in in the semiclassical limit @xmath148 . the lower end point @xmath136 in yields the asymptotic contribution g_d(e ) = t_r(e,0 ) _ n=-^ ( -1)^n e^i[ns_r(e,0)/+/2]u_n(e ) , [ gd1 ] where we have left out the contribution from @xmath173 which contributes to the tf part , and defined the quantity u_n(e ) = _ l0 . using the identity @xcite = _ m=-^ , ( zn , n ) [ polesum ] we find u_n(e ) = _ l0 . [ une ] we now exploit the result from which we find = -+ 2a(e ) l + o(l^2 ) . for odd values of @xmath24 , the sin function in gives always a nonzero denominator in the limit @xmath136 , so that @xmath174 becomes zero . for even @xmath175 we get in the limit @xmath176 ( ) = ( -k+2kla(e ) ) = ( -1)^k(2kla(e ) ) ( -1)^k 2kla(e ) , so that we obtain u_2k(e ) = . inserting this into using , leaving out the contribution @xmath38 which is contained in @xmath177 , we obtain the final contribution of the diameter orbits to the density of states : g_d(e ) = -_k=1^ ( ks_d(e)/ ) , [ dgd2 ] where the actions @xmath178 are given explicitly in . in the low - energy limit we obtain with exactly the diameter contribution to the perturbative trace formula . note that the presence of the linear term @xmath179 in the quantity is instrumental in annihilating the contributions with odd @xmath24 to the sum in and hence in establishing the fact that only an even number of radial oscillations yields a physical periodic orbit with angular momentum @xmath164 . the upper end point @xmath180 in yields the asymptotic contribution g_c(e ) = l_m(e)t_r(e , l_m ) _ m=-^(-1)^m e^i[2l_m(e)/-/2 ] _ n=-^. [ gc1 ] using , and noting that @xmath181 , we get |_l_m = - . employing again to perform the @xmath24 summation , writing @xmath182 and omitting the @xmath38 term , we obtain after some manipulations the contribution of the circle orbits to the density of states g_c(e ) = _ k=1^ ( ks_c(e)/ ) , [ dgc2 ] where @xmath183 is given explicitly in , and the quantity @xmath184 is defined by w(e ) = = . [ wofe ] in the limit @xmath185 this quantity is found with the r.h.s . of the analytical results and to go like w(e ) = 2(1+e/4 + ) = 2+e + expanding the denominator in , using the above @xmath184 , up to first order in @xmath1 brings the amplitude exactly into that of the circle orbit contribution to the perturbative result . note that the denominator under the sum in looks exactly like that in the gutzwiller trace formula @xcite for an isolated stable orbit , whereby @xmath186 corresponds to one - half of the stability angle . indeed , the semiclassical amplitude in diverges when @xmath187 becomes an integer @xmath188 . at the corresponding nonzero energies , the circle orbit bifurcates ; the condition for this to happen is exactly the resonance condition for the rational tori with @xmath189 , taken at @xmath190 . ( we come back to this point in section [ sectori ] . ) using and , we find that @xmath184 is restricted to the following range : 2 < w(e ) = < 0 . [ wlim ] the smallest @xmath36 for which we can have @xmath191 with @xmath192 is @xmath193 with @xmath194 , so that @xmath195 , which happens at the scaled energy @xmath196 ( see below ) . this means that the shortest new orbit is the 7:3 torus , bifurcating from the 3rd repetition of the circle orbit . the next bifurcation ( from @xmath197 ) is that of the 9:4 torus at @xmath198 . still longer orbits bifurcate at lower energies , but from higher repetitions of the circle orbit . therefore , we can ignore the bifurcations at low energies and small repetition numbers @xmath36 and concentrate on the contributions of the diameter and circle orbits to the density of states . let us finally write down the trace formula which we have obtained for the oscillating part of the density of states : g(e ) _ k=1^ , [ dguni ] where the semiclassical amplitudes are given by _ k^c(e ) = , _ k^d(e ) = . [ ampcd ] in the following we shall test this formula against the quantum - mechanical density of states . as we have shown above , goes over into the perturbative trace formula in the limit @xmath26 . this confirms the assumption , made at the end of sect . [ secpois ] , that the contributions with @xmath171 to do not contribute in this limit . in this section we compare our semiclassical results with those obtained from the exact quantum - mechanical spectrum ( obtained numerically by solving the radial schrdinger equation on a discrete mesh ) . in order to focus on the _ coarse - grained _ shell structure , we convolute both results over the energy @xmath18 with a normalised gaussian of width @xmath199 . the quantum - mechanical density of states then becomes g_qm(e ) = _ n e^-(e - e_n)^2/^2 . [ gqmgam ] in order to obtain its oscillating part , we subtract from it the tf expression @xmath172 which we can calculate analytically ( see appendix [ app3 ] ) . the semiclassical trace formula becomes , after doing the convolution in stationary - phase approximation ( cf . @xcite , sec . 5.5 ) g_sc(e ) _ po a_po(e ) e^-[t_po(e)/2]^2 [ s_po(e)/-_po/2 ] , [ dgscgam ] so that orbits with longer periods @xmath200 will be exponentially suppressed . in we show a comparison of the results obtained with the uniform trace formula for the case @xmath201 with those obtained from the exact numerical quantum spectrum . the width of the gaussian smoothing was chosen to be @xmath202 ; in the semiclassical result the harmonics @xmath203 then do not contribute noticeably . the agreement is seen to be perfect ; tiny differences can only be noted near the beat minima on the amplified scale below . in we show a similar comparison for @xmath204 , exhibiting much fine structures . we now start to resolve the spectrum with a higher resolution ; note that we still only plot the oscillating part @xmath7 of the density of states . in the top panel , the semiclassical result includes harmonics ( i.e. , repetitions of the two orbits ) with @xmath205 . this is evidently sufficient to reproduce the quantum - mechanical oscillations up to @xmath206 with a high accuracy . in the centre panel , we have added two more harmonics , going up to @xmath207 . here we recognise the appearance of divergences at the scaled energies @xmath208 and @xmath209 which correspond to the bifurcations of the 19:9 and 17:8 tori from the repetitions of the circle orbit with @xmath210 and @xmath211 , respectively ( cf . below ) . the small wiggles close to the divergences , with decreasing amplitudes when going away from them , are due to the missing contributions from those torus orbits in the trace formula ( see the following section ) . = 13.5 cm in order to anticipate the results of a suitable uniform trace formula including the contributions of the tori , we show in the bottom panel of the result of the ebk trace integral obtained by a numerical integration over the variable @xmath111 . hereby the summations over @xmath24 and @xmath141 have been done in the limits @xmath212 , @xmath213 using @xmath214 . [ the period to be used in the gaussian damping factor of is in this case given by @xmath215 . ] now the divergences and all other discrepancies have disappeared ; the difference to the quantum - mechanical result can hardly be recognised . the integral therefore is also a uniform expression for the semiclassical density of states , containing the contributions of all periodic orbits . the numerical evaluation becomes , however , very time consuming for even finer energy resolutions ( i.e. , still smaller values of @xmath199 ) . our main result here is that up to a rather fine resolution , the shell structure of the present perturbed ho system is dominated by the two - fold degenerate families of diameter and circle orbits , although these are not the most degenerate orbits . this is a rather unusual situation , due to the fact that the shortest tori with the highest degeneracy are considerably longer ( by a factor @xmath21610 ) than the primitive diameter and circle orbits . let us finally test the range of validity of the perturbative trace formula . in we compare its results to that of the full trace formula for the two values @xmath217 ( upper panel ) and @xmath201 ( lower panel ) . as expected , the two curves agree in the limit @xmath185 . however , already for @xmath217 the amplitude modulation of the perturbative result deviates so much that the position of the first beat node is predicted by about 10% too low in energy . for @xmath201 , the perturbative result becomes so bad that it predicts the second beat node approximately at the position of the correct first one . these results underline the fact that in @xcite , the quantum results for weak interactions could be qualitatively reproduced by the perturbative trace formula , but not quantitatively with correct positions of the beat nodes . a more detailed analysis of the selfconsistent hf results of @xcite using the uniform trace formula is in progress @xcite . as we have seen in the previous section , periodic orbit with both angular and radial motion appear as the rational tori fulfilling the periodicity condition . for the hamiltonian , this condition can only be fulfilled in the limits given in . this means that stationary points @xmath218 of the @xmath96 integral in satisfying and hence only exist if @xmath219 . hereby @xmath220 corresponds to the repetition number @xmath36 of the circle orbit that undergoes a bifurcation exactly when @xmath218 is equal to the maximum angular momentum @xmath221 . in we list some of the lowest energies @xmath222 at which this happens for the smallest integers @xmath189 . each of the @xmath223 tori only exists above its bifurcation energy , i.e. , at energies @xmath224 . [ cols="^,^,<,<,<",options="header " , ] the contributions of the bifurcated tori to the semiclassical trace formula is obtained by a stationary - phase evaluation of the @xmath111 integral in , leading to g_tori(e ) = _ n>2m>0 a^t_nm(e)(-1)^n+m ( + ) . [ dgt ] the summation goes only over those pairs @xmath163 of positive integers for which the stationary condition can be fulfilled . ( note that the contribution of the corresponding pairs of negative integers is included in the amplitudes by a factor 2 . ) the actions of the tori are given by s^t_nm(e ) = ns_r(e , l_nm)+m2l_nm(e ) , [ stori ] and their amplitudes by ^t_nm(e ) = t_r(e , l_nm)l_nm(e ) ( n| |_l = l_nm(e))^-1/2(e - e_n : m ) , [ amptori ] where @xmath114 is the action unit given in . the heaviside step function in is defined as ( x ) = 0 x < 0,(x ) = 1/2 x = 0,(x ) = 1 x > 0,where the value 1/2 for @xmath225 accounts for the fact that one obtains only half a fresnel integral when the stationary point is the upper end point of the integral in . the power @xmath150 in the amplitude @xmath226 is characteristic of the three - fold degenerate orbits in a three - dimensional spherical system @xcite . . corresponds to the standard berry - tabor trace formula @xcite for the most degenerate orbits in an integrable system . here , however , each contribution to is only valid if the energy @xmath106 is sufficiently larger than the corresponding bifurcation energy @xmath222 . in the neighbourhood of the bifurcation energies , we have to replace the sum of the diverging circle orbit contribution and the corresponding torus contribution with @xmath227 by a common uniform contribution . as it is well - known from the semiclassical theory of bifurcations @xcite , one has to include hereby also the contributions of so - called `` ghost orbits '' , which are the imaginary ( or complex ) continuations of the bifurcated orbits ( here : the tori ) to the other side of the bifurcation ( here : @xmath228 ) . it is , however , not the purpose of our present paper to discuss in more detail the uniform approximation suitable for this situation . the present scenario is actually almost identical to that described in @xcite for the bifurcations of tori in the integrable hnon - heiles system . although there the orbit from which the tori bifurcate is an isolated one , while it here is a family of circle orbits , the uniform trace formula given in @xcite can be applied to the present system in a straightforward manner . we refer the interested reader to this paper for all the detailed formulae as well as for a numerical demonstration showing how diverging discrepancies of the type seen in the centre part of disappear when a proper uniform trace formula is used . its result would here be practically indistinguishable from the result shown in the bottom part of , in which we have evaluated the integral in numerically instead of using the stationary phase approximation with end - point corrections . in this section we discuss briefly a purely quartic oscillator potential , i.e. , we start from the hamiltonian h ( , ) = 12p^2 + r^4 = e. [ hr4 ] here both the energy and @xmath1 can be scaled away . after dividing the above equation by @xmath18 and introducing the scaled variables q_i = ( ) ^1/4r_i , = ( e)^1/4t , l = ^1/4e^-3/4l , we obtain the `` unit energy '' equation 1 = 12q^2 + 14q^4 + , where the dot again means derivative with respect to the scaled time @xmath110 . hence the classical equations of motion become independent of energy and @xmath1 . after obtaining all the classical results , we can reintroduce @xmath18 and @xmath1 just by remembering that lengths scale with @xmath229 , momenta with @xmath230 , times ( periods ) with @xmath231 , actions and angular momenta with @xmath232 . we obtain the semiclassical trace formula from the results of the previous sections and of the appendix [ app3 ] simply by taking the limit @xmath30 , which means practically by extracting the leading terms for @xmath233 . in this way , we obtain the following primitive periods and actions for the circle orbit : t_c(e ) = 2 ^ -1/4(4e/3)^-1/4,s_c(e ) = 2l_m(e ) = 2 ^ -1/4(4e/3)^3/4 , [ circr4 ] and for the diameter orbit : t_d(e ) = 2 ^ -1/4k_0e^-1/4,s_d(e ) = 2 ^ -1/4(4/3)k_0e^3/4 . [ diagr4 ] here @xmath234 is the constant elliptic integral k_0=k(_0)=1.8540746773 ,_0 = 1/. furthermore we get t_r(e , l_m ) = ( 3e)^-1/4 . the resonance condition becomes independent of the energy = w(l_nm ) = , [ wofl ] since both periods scale with the same power of the energy . for the frequency ratio we find the limits 2 w(l_nm ) = n : m < 0 l_nm < l_m = ( 4/3)^3/4 = 1.240806 [tori4 ] note that the upper limit @xmath235 never becomes a stationary point , so that no bifurcations of the circle orbits occur in this system . the values of the stationary points @xmath236 ( in scaled dimensionless units ) for the lowest values of @xmath24 and @xmath141 are given in the rightmost column of ; as we just have seen , they do not depend on the energy @xmath18 . the result @xmath237 is a special case of the general result , given in @xcite , that for a potential @xmath94 = @xmath238 one has @xmath239 . for the amplitudes of the circle and diameter orbits in the trace formula , which keeps the same form , we obtain here _ k^c(e ) = , _ k^d(e ) = . [ ampr4 ] the actions @xmath83 and @xmath82 to be used in are those given in and . finally , the tf level density is found to be g_tf(e ) = . the tori , which in the perturbed ho system discussed in the last section occur only at sufficiently high energies after their bifurcations from the repeated circle orbits , exist in the present system at all energies . they affect again only the finer quantum structures of the density of states since they only exist for @xmath240 due to the selection by their resonance condition ( cf . also ) . this is demonstrated in the following two figures . in , we compare the results of the semiclassical trace formula for the diameters and circles using the above quantities to the exact quantum - mechanical density of states , both gaussian - averaged over a width @xmath241 ( in energy units ) . the agreement is again perfect even on the enlarged scale in the lower part of the figure . the reason is that for the chosen energy resolution with @xmath241 , only repetition numbers @xmath242 contribute , for which there exist no tori ( see ) . = 9.2 cm = 4.5 cm shows the same comparison for @xmath243 . here some small discrepancies appear which become more visible with increasing energy . they are due to the missing contributions from the tori with @xmath244 . since there are no bifurcations involved in the present system , the contributions of the tori are given by the berry - tabor trace formula , employing the appropriate expressions for the actions and periods used therein . the analytical expression of the action integral @xmath245 in terms of elliptic integrals is the same as for the perturbed ho potential , as given in eqs . - , except that here the term @xmath246 in the potential and the corresponding contribution @xmath247 must be omitted . even at the rather fine resolution obtained in , our main result is the observation that the circle and diameter orbits dominate the shell structure also for the purely quartic oscillator . motivated by recent hartree - fock ( hf ) calculations of harmonically trapped fermionic gases with a repulsive interaction @xcite , in which pronounced super - shell effects were obtained , we have developed a semiclassical trace formula for the density of states of the anharmonically perturbed three - dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator ( ho ) defined in . we find that its gross - shell structure is dominated by the periodic orbits of diameter and circle shape , whose interference leads to super - shell beats which explain the findings from the numerical hf results . in a first step , we have used the perturbative approach of creagh @xcite to describe the symmetry breaking u(3 ) @xmath25 so(3 ) for weak anharmonicities @xmath1 , resulting in the perturbative trace formula . it uniformly restores the u(3 ) limit , yielding the exact trace formula of the unperturbed ho system in the limit @xmath26 . for the derivation of the perturbative result , one must in principle integrate over the 4-fold degenerate families of unperturbed ho orbits which cover the manifold @xmath2p@xmath3 . as shown in app . [ app2 ] , however , it turns out to be easier to integrate over the energy shell in phase space , which is a five - sphere s@xmath31 , whereby the integration can be reduced , under exploitation of the so(3 ) symmetry , to the one - dimensional integral given analytically in . an interesting result hereby is the fact that its two contributions , corresponding to the diameter and circle orbits , already have the characteristic form occurring in the general trace formula . usually , this form is obtained from a perturbative trace formula only asymptotically in the semiclassical limit @xmath148 ; this happens , e.g. , also when one investigates the corresponding hamiltonian in two dimensions or other perturbed 2-dimensional systems @xcite . next we have used the standard ebk quantisation and the poisson summation formula to derive a general semiclassical trace formula for arbitrary central potentials in terms of a one - dimensional integral over the angular momentum @xmath96 of the classical orbits , given in . exact integration and summation over all @xmath248 yields , to leading order in @xmath77 , the ebk spectrum . its asymptotic evaluation in the limit @xmath148 yields the standard - type contributions to the trace formula . the end - point contributions yield the diameter orbits with @xmath164 and the circle orbits with maximum angular momentum ; both contributions are of next - to - leading order in @xmath77 , whereas the leading - order contributions corresponding to the typical rational tori of integrable systems according to the berry - tabor theory @xcite come from the stationary points inside the integration interval . one interesting mathematical aspect is the mechanism by which the ratio @xmath249 of radial to angular frequency of the diameter orbit is naturally selected by a property of the general radial action integral @xmath250 as a function of angular momentum @xmath96 which appears to be universal for regular spherical potentials . it holds also for a particle in a spherical box with specular reflection , for which we have re - derived in appendix [ appbb ] the trace formula given by balian and bloch @xcite from our general formula , taking into account the changes of the maslov indices due to hard - wall reflections ) . the coulomb potential , for which @xmath251 , is discussed in appendix [ appcoul ] where we also re - derive the exact trace formula for the rydberg spectrum given in @xcite . for the hamiltonian , we have derived a uniform trace formula for the diameter and circle orbit contributions that is valid for arbitrary @xmath1 . we find that for low energies and low repetition numbers no tori exist , so that the gross - shell structure of this system is dominated by the circle and diameter orbits and their lowest repetitions . the tori bifurcate , at sufficiently high energy , out of the repetitions with @xmath78 of the circle orbits , as was also observed recently for homogeneous power - law potentials in @xcite . their contributions sufficiently high above the respective bifurcation energies are given by the usual berry - tabor type trace formula . we have not discussed here the common uniform treatment of the circle orbits and the tori bifurcating from them , since this scenario is identical to the one discussed in detail in @xcite . the same qualitative results are found also in the limit @xmath252 in which the potential becomes a purely quartic oscillator . although the tori with @xmath80 here exist at all energies , they are so much longer ( by a factor @xmath253 ) than the shortest diameter and circle orbits that they only affect the finer details of the quantum spectrum . we thus have found the interesting and quite atypical situation of a three - dimensional system in which the periodic orbits with highest , i.e. , three - fold degeneracy are only responsible for finer details of the quantum spectrum , whereas its gross - shell structure is to an astonishing degree dominated by the orbits of next - to - leading order in @xmath77 , i.e. , the diameter and circle orbits occurring in two - fold degenerate families . this is totally different from the situation , observed first by balian and bloch @xcite , of a spherical cavity potential ( with ideally reflecting walls ) which has turned out to be a realistic model for large spherical metal clusters . ( we re - derive the semiclassical trace formula of balian and bloch for the spherical cavity in appendix [ appbb ] . ) there the famous super - shells @xcite come from the interference of the shortest three - fold degenerate tori ( the triangle and square orbits ) , whereas the two - fold degenerate diameter orbit family has virtually no effect on the observable shell structure of these systems . our results explain qualitatively the numerical quantum - mechanical hf results @xcite for harmonically trapped fermionic atom gases . a more quantitative comparison , in which the strength @xmath1 of the perturbation in is determined directly from the numerically obtained self - consistent hf potentials , is in progress @xcite . lazzari _ et al . _ @xcite have studied the periodic orbits in a spherical woods - saxon potential in connection with the physics of metal clusters and thereby focused on the contributions of the diameter orbits . we find agreement of their results for the tori and the diameters with our results , and , respectively , if we interpret their function @xmath254 as being _ the radial period @xmath255 at the corresponding stationary value @xmath218 of the angular momentum (= 0 for the diameters ) . they have , however , neglected the contributions from the circle orbits ; furthermore they did not compare their semiclassical results with quantum - mechanical results . we suspect that the neglect of the circle orbits might be justifiable due to the chosen steepness of their woods - saxon potential , for which the triangle - like tori are perhaps more important than the circles . ozorio de almeida _ et al . _ @xcite have discussed the summation of all periodic orbits in integrable systems in connection with spectral determinants . they conclude that edge corrections corresponding to lower - degenerate orbits may be neglected because they are implicitly approximated by the nearest - lying rational tori ( characterised by very large numbers @xmath248 in our notation ) . while their argument applies to the _ full quantisation _ of the exact ( or ebk - approximated ) quantum spectrum obtained by summing over _ all orbits _ , it can not be used when the spectrum is coarse - grained with a finite energy window @xmath199 , such as we have used the periodic - orbit sum in our present investigation ( cf . also the discussion in the appendix of ref . @xcite ) which is more practically oriented . we acknowledge enlightening discussions with s. bechtluft - sachs , s. creagh , and n. sndergaard , and helpful comments by an anonymous referee . we are particularly grateful to k. jnich for providing us with the elegant reduction of the s@xmath31 integration given in appendix [ app2 ] . we thank a. magner for valuable comments on our manuscript and for bringing the refs . @xcite to our attention . this work was financially supported by the swedish foundation for strategic research and the swedish research council . m. . acknowledges financial support from the deutsche forschungsgesellschaft ( graduiertenkolleg 638 : _ nichtlinearitt und nichtgleichgewicht in kondensierter materie _ ) , and m.b . acknowledges the warm hospitality at the lth during several research visits . we reproduce here the parametrisation of @xmath2p@xmath3 given in @xcite . we start with three complex numbers @xmath256 : ( z_1,z_2,z_3 ) = ( n_1,n_2e^i_2,n_3e^i_3 ) , with @xmath257 , @xmath258 , and @xmath259 , @xmath260 , whereby the @xmath261 are restricted to n_1 ^ 2+n_2 ^ 2+n_3 ^ 2=1 . [ ensh ] the @xmath262 define the complex projective space @xmath2p@xmath3 . the @xmath261 are in one - to - one correspondence with the points on the first octant of the 2-sphere @xmath60 , and the @xmath263 form a 2-torus . at the edges of the octant , the torus contracts to a circle or to a point , and one or both of the @xmath263 are not defined . physically , we interpret the real and negative imaginary parts of the @xmath262 as coordinates and momenta , respectively , of a starting point @xmath264 r_(0 ) = e z_,p_(0 ) = - m z _ , in the 6-dimensional phase space @xmath265 of the 3-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator . the hamiltonian , which has u(3 ) symmetry @xcite , is given by h ( , ) = 12 _ = 1 ^ 3 = e. the @xmath266-periodic solutions of the equations of motion are then given by r_(t ) = e ( z_e^it ) , p_(t ) = -m ( z_e^it ) . the equation defines the energy shell , so that the six quantities @xmath267 are points on a 5-sphere , s@xmath31 ( see also appendix [ app2 ] below ) . by taking the total energy to be @xmath268 and setting @xmath269 , we fix the radius of the 5-sphere to be unity . taking out the phase factor @xmath270 takes us from s@xmath31 to the projective space @xmath2p@xmath3 . using the fubini - study metric , the authors of @xcite find the squared distance @xmath271 between two points on @xmath2p@xmath3 to be ds^2 = dn_1 ^ 2+dn_2 ^ 2+dn_3 ^ 2 + n_2 ^ 2(1-n_2 ^ 2)d_2 ^ 2+n_3 ^ 2(1-n_3 ^ 2)d_3 ^ 2 - 2n_2 ^ 2n_3 ^ 2d_2d_3 . [ ds2 ] the first three terms correspond to the standard metric on @xmath60 , and the last three to the metric on a flat 2-torus whose shape depends on where we are on the octant . we now wish to re - parametrise the @xmath261 in terms of the two polar angles @xmath272 on @xmath60 by writing n_1 = , n_2 = , n_3 = , [ coord ] with @xmath273 $ ] . collecting our four angles in a vector @xmath274 by defining = ( _ 1,_2,_3,_4 ) = ( , , _ 2,_3 ) , we can write the squared distance @xmath271 as ds^2 = _ i , j=1 ^ 4 g_ijd_id_j , [ ds2a ] and find the elements @xmath275 of the metric tensor to be @xmath276 , @xmath277 , @xmath278 , @xmath279 , @xmath280 , and @xmath281 . from this , we get the integration measure on @xmath2p@xmath3 to be d_^2 = |det(g_ij)|^1/2 d_1d_2d_3d_4 = ^3d dd_2d_3 . the integrated volume of @xmath2p@xmath3 , consistent with a general formula for @xmath2p@xmath282 , is _ ^2 = d_^2 = _ ^n = . here we give a strict proof of eq . of the modulation factor @xmath283 for the anharmonically perturbed ho system . the most straightforward parametrisation of the six - dimensional phase space of the unperturbed ho is given in terms of the coordinate vector @xmath284 and the momentum vector @xmath285 @xmath286 . since a periodic solution is uniquely determined by their initial values at @xmath287 : @xmath288 and @xmath289 , and the total energy @xmath290 is a constant of motion , the six components of @xmath291 and @xmath292 must cover a 5-sphere with radius @xmath293 . we introduce dimensionless coordinate and momentum vectors @xmath294 and @xmath295 , respectively , by = _ 0 , = _ 0 , [ unvec ] so that in these variables the energy shell becomes the unit sphere s@xmath31 : ^2+^2 = 1 . [ ens5 ] from eq . , the first - order action perturbation @xmath296 is given in terms of energy @xmath18 and angular momentum @xmath96 by s_1 = -(3-^2l^2/e^2 ) , [ ds1 ] with @xmath46 defined in . the modulation factor for the first - order perturbed ho system becomes therefore ( k/ ) = d_s^5 e^iks_1/ , [ modfac5 ] where @xmath297 is the five - dimensional solid angle and @xmath298 is the integration measure on s@xmath31 with @xmath299 . one may now express @xmath296 in directly in terms of the five polar angles of six - dimensional hyperspherical coordinates , which becomes a very complicated function , and integrate over all five angles . we have done this numerically and verified that it yields exactly the same result as the numerical 4-dimensional @xmath2p@xmath3 integration of with the phase function . it is , however , not necessary to perform the full five - dimensional integral for . we follow a much more economical route @xcite , exploiting the rotational symmetry of the system and the so(3 ) invariance of the expression for @xmath296 . due to the restriction , we can write the s@xmath31 sphere as s^5 = \{(*e*_,*e * _ ) | ; _ , * e*_s^2 } , [ s5new ] where @xmath300 and @xmath301 are the unit vectors in the directions of @xmath294 and @xmath295 , respectively . the square of the conserved total angular momentum then is l^2 = * l*^2 = ( _ 0_0)^2 = ^2 ^ 2 ( * e*__)^2 , so that the action perturbation becomes , after the substitution @xmath302 , s_1 = - , . [ ds1a ] the integration measure for is d_s^5 = ^2d_s^2(*e * _ ) ^2d_s^2(*e*_)d = 18 ^ 2d d_s^2(*e * _ ) d_s^2(*e * _ ) , and the modulation factor becomes ( k/ ) = _ 0^d^2 d_s^2(*e * _ ) d_s^2(*e * _ ) e^-ik/. [ mf5a ] we now introduce the angle @xmath303 between the unit vectors @xmath300 and @xmath301 , so that ( * e*__)^2 = ^2 , and choose @xmath300 as the direction of the north pole ( @xmath304 ) of polar angles @xmath305 for the vector @xmath301 . the integrand then becomes independent of @xmath300 , so that the corresponding s@xmath3 integral just gives @xmath306 . for the other s@xmath3 integral we have @xmath307 since the integrand does not depend on @xmath308 . we thus obtain , after the standard substitution @xmath309 and an obvious reduction of the integration limits , ( k/ ) = _ 0^/2 d^2 _ 0 ^ 1 du e^-ik/. next , we make the substitution @xmath310 and then a further substitution @xmath311 to obtain ( k/ ) = _ 0^/2d _ 0^ dt e^-ik(3-^2+t^2)/ = _ 0 ^ 1 ds _ 0^ dt e^-ik(2+s^2+t^2)/. since the last integral goes exactly over the first quadrant of a unit disk in the @xmath312 plane , we can use polar coordinates @xmath313 and furthermore @xmath314 to obtain our final result ( k/ ) = _ 0^/2 d _ 0 ^ 1 drre^-ik(2+r^2)/ = _ 0 ^ 1 dze^-ik(3-z)/ , which is identical to that given in or in . in this appendix we derive analytical expressions for the particular scaled potential @xmath118 in . rewriting the radial action integral using the substitution @xmath315 , we obtain s_r(e , l ) = 2_q_1^q_2 dq = _ z_1^z_2 , [ srint ] where g(z ) = 4ez-2z^2-z^3 - 2l^2 = ( z_1-z)(z_2-z)(z_3-z ) . [ gz ] the classical turning points are defined by the roots of the cubic equation @xmath316 , which are always real : the discriminant can easily be shown to be negative except for @xmath180 where it becomes zero due to the double root @xmath317 . selecting the roots such that z_3 < z_1 z_2 , one finds that @xmath318 is always negative , whereas @xmath319 and @xmath320 are positive definite and represent the squares of the real classical turning points @xmath134 and @xmath135 . the integrals in can not be found in most tables . however , after an integration by parts we may write the r.h.s . as s_r(e , l ) = s_r^(1)(e , l)+ s_r^(2)(e , l)-l^2 s_r^(-1)(e , l ) , [ srltot ] where we have defined s_r^(n)(e , l ) = _ z_1^z_2 dz . in byrd and friedman @xcite , these integrals are found to be : s_r^(1)(e , l ) & = & [ ( ^2-^2)k()+^2e ( ) ] , + s_r^(2)(e , l ) & = & [ ( 3 ^ 4 - 6 ^ 2 ^ 2 + 2 ^ 4+^2 ^ 4 ) k()+2 ^ 2(3 ^ 2-^2-^2 ^ 2 ) e ( ) ] , + s_r^(-1)(e , l ) & = & ( ^2 , ) . [ sradn ] here @xmath321 , @xmath322 and @xmath323 are the complete elliptic integrals of first , second and third kind with modulus @xmath324 , and = , ^2 = 1- . [ kap ] note that @xmath325 , which corresponds to the circular case of the elliptic integral @xmath323 @xcite . this function becomes singular like @xmath326 , i.e. , for @xmath327 which happens when @xmath176 . since @xmath319 goes to zero like @xmath328 in this limit , @xmath323 has a first - order pole at @xmath136 . using the laurent expansion of @xmath323 given in eq . 906.04 of @xcite , we find s_r^(-1)(e , l ) = -2a(e ) + o(l ) = -2a(e ) + o(l ) , [ srlm1 ] with a(e ) = - = ( 1-e + ) . [ aofe ] here @xmath329 and @xmath330 are the @xmath136 values of the quantities given in eqs . and below . the last equality in follows because @xmath331 , as seen from . the functions @xmath332 with @xmath333 are both regular in @xmath136 . altogether we obtain the following taylor expansion for the total radial action integral : s_r(e , l ) = s_r(e,0 ) - l + a(e)l^2 + o(l^3 ) , [ srlexp ] the radial period is easily found to be t_r(e , l ) = s_r^(0)(e , l ) = k ( ) . [ trad1 ] in the limit @xmath136 , which is relevant for the diameter orbits and the tf density of states , the above results simplify considerably . we obtain s_r(e,0 ) & = & 23(1 + 4e)^1/4 , [ sr0 ] + t_r(e,0 ) & = & 2(1 + 4e)^-1/4k(_0 ) [ tr0 ] . note that in this limit we get z_1 ^ 0=0,z_2 ^ 0=(q_2 ^ 0)^2=-1,z_3 ^ 0=--1 , [ zi0 ] and the modulus of the elliptic integrals becomes _ 0 = = = ( 1-e + ) . [ kap0 ] the tf expression for the density of states becomes g_tf(e ) & = & ( 1 + 4e)^1/4 [ 2(1 + 3e)e(_0)-(1 + 3e+)k(_0 ) ] . [ gtf0 ] it is of interest to see the first terms in the taylor expansion of the above results around @xmath334 , whose leading terms are those of the pure harmonic oscillator : s_r(e , l ) & = & ( e - l)-18(3e^2-l^2)+ , [ srtay ] + t_r(e , l ) & = & -34e+(7e^2-l^2)+ , [ trtay ] + g_tf(e ) & = & e^2(1 - 5e/4 + ) .[gtftay ] the unscaled leading ho terms are s_r^ho(e , l ) = ( -l ) = , t_r^ho = , g_tf^ho(e ) = . the diameter orbit with @xmath164 makes two full radial oscillations during its primitive period . therefore its primitive action and period are given by s_d(e ) = 2s_r(e,0),t_d(e)=2t_r(e,0 ) . [ stdia ] for the circle orbit , the primitive action integral @xmath183 is just @xmath266 times the maximum value of the angular momentum , @xmath335 , which for the present potential is found to be l_m(e ) = s , s_c(e ) = 2l_m(e ) = ( 1-e/4 + ) . [ scirc ] the primitive period of the circle orbit is given by its energy derivative t_c(e ) = = ( 1-e/2 + ) . [ tcirc ] we also give here the value of the radial period @xmath336 at @xmath180 . the corresponding frequency @xmath337 is easily obtained from the second derivative of the effective potential at its minimum @xmath144 , which for the present potential is given by q_0 ^ 2=z_0=2(-1)/3 , using @xmath338 , and the result becomes t_r(e , l_m ) = = ( 1 + 3e)^-1/4 = ( 1 - 3e/4 + ) . [ trlm ] this agrees with the result obtained from , noting that for the maximum value of @xmath180 , @xmath339 and @xmath340 , so that @xmath324 becomes zero and @xmath341 . in order to illustrate the validity and the usage of our general ebk trace integral , we present in this appendix briefly its application to two popular spherical potentials . we consider a particle with mass @xmath19 in a spherical box with radius @xmath58 and ideal specular reflection from the boundary , i.e. , a three - dimensional spherical billiard . quantum - mechanically , one obtains the spectrum by solving the schrdinger equation with dirichlet boundary conditions . the semiclassical trace formula for this system has been derived by balian and bloch @xcite using a multi - reflection expansion of the green function . to derive it from our formula , we need the radial action integral for arbitrary energy @xmath342 and angular momentum @xmath343 . working throughout with unscaled variables , we find ( with @xmath344 ) s_r(e , l ) = 2_r_1^r dr & = & 2 - 2l(l / r ) + & = & 2r - l + l^2/r + o(l^3 ) , [ srlbox ] thus fulfilling our general relation with a(e ) = 1/r . with this , the stationary condition gives 2n(l / r ) = 2 m with the solutions l_nm = r(m / n ) . as in the potentials discussed in sect . [ secuni ] , the solution with @xmath164 corresponding to n=2 m contributes only via the end - point correction of to the diameter orbit with the primitive action s_d(e ) = 2s_r(e,0 ) = 4r and , according to the lower equation in , with the amplitude of its @xmath36-th repetition _ k^d(e ) = . ( k=|m| ) the upper end - point correction with @xmath345 can , for @xmath346 , only be reached formally in the limit @xmath347 . it corresponds to the `` whispering gallery mode '' with amplitude @xmath348 , cf . below , and does therefore not contribute to the trace formula . the tori with @xmath349 have the actions s^t_nm(e ) = ns_r(e , l_nm)+2 m l_nm = 2nr_nm , _ nm = m / n . [ stbb ] this corresponds exactly to the actions of the polygonal orbits given in @xcite with winding number @xmath350 and @xmath351 corners ( i.e. , reflections from the boundary ) . the case @xmath352 corresponds to the @xmath36-th repetition of the diameter orbit . for the polygons , @xmath353 is half the polar angle covered by one of their segments . the amplitudes of the tori with @xmath354 become , according to , ^t_vk(e ) = ( 2_vk ) . [ ampbb ] before we can write down the trace formula with the correct phases , we have to correct the radial quantisation condition , because the maslov index changes from 1/4 to 1/2 per turning point if a reflection happens there . hence the quantisation condition is @xmath355 for the diameter orbit and @xmath356 for the tori . this changes the phases in and all the results derived from it . taking this into account , we obtain the semiclassical trace formula for the spherical billiard g(e ) = _ v>2k>0^t_vk(e ) - _ k>0 a_k^d(e ) , [ dgbb ] which is identically the result of balian and bloch @xcite . here we derive the trace formula for the coulomb potential as a special central potential which is not regular in @xmath357 : v(r ) = - . [ vcoul ] we need not use scaled variables here , but it is useful to introduce the positive energy @xmath358 since all bound states in the potential have @xmath359 . the maximum angular momentum and the action of the circle orbit are l_m(e ) = , s_c(e)= , from which the period of the circle orbit is found to be t_c(e ) = 2 = . the radial action integral becomes elementary ( cf . @xcite ) : s_r(e , l ) = _ r_1^r_2 dr = 2(-l ) = 2 . [ srcoul ] from it we find the radial period t_r(e ) = . the difference from the other potentials treated in this paper is that the term linear in @xmath96 in here has the coefficient @xmath360 . furthermore , we find from the general relation = -2 _ ( e ) = _ r(e ) , t_r(e ) = t_(e ) . [ trat ] thus , the radial and angular frequencies are identically the same for all values of the angular momentum @xmath96 . this is a special property of kepler s ellipses . [ note that here , in contrast to the spherical ho , the angular momentum @xmath96 is defined with respect to one of the focal points and not to the symmetry centre of the ellipse ! ] inserting the above results into the general ebk trace integral for the density of states , we obtain g_coul(e ) = _ m , n=-^ ( -1)^m+n_0^l_m(e ) ldl e^i2/. [ gcoul ] due to , the general resonance condition implies @xmath361 for all periodic orbits . we therefore only use the terms with @xmath362 in the double sum of ( cf . the discussion at the end of sect . [ secpois ] ) . we then find g_coul(e ) = . writing this in terms of atomic units ( note that we have put @xmath19 ) e_at= = ry , we finally obtain the quantum - mechanically exact trace formula g_coul(e ) = _ n=1^n^2 ( e+e_at / n^2 ) = , [ gcoul1 ] which has been given in @xcite . the eigenenergies e_n = -,(n = n_r++1 ) with degeneracies @xmath363 are , as is well known , also found directly from the ebk quantisation conditions - using and . m. c. gutzwiller : _ chaos in classical and quantum mechanics _ ( springer verlag , new york , 1990 ) ; + h .- j . stckmann : _ quantum chaos : an introduction _ ( cambridge university press , cambridge , uk , 1999 ) ; + f. haake : _ quantum signatures of chaos _ ( springer , 2nd edition , 2001 ) . Abstract:
[ "we develop a uniform semiclassical trace formula for the density of states of a three - dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator ( ho ) , perturbed by a term @xmath0 . this term breaks the u(3 ) symmetry of the ho , resulting in a spherical system with so(3 ) symmetry . we first treat the anharmonic term for small @xmath1 in semiclassical perturbation theory by integration of the action of the perturbed periodic ho orbit families over the manifold @xmath2p@xmath3 which is covered by the parameters describing their four - fold degeneracy . then we obtain an analytical uniform trace formula for arbitrary @xmath1 which in the limit of strong perturbations ( or high energy ) asymptotically goes over into the correct trace formula of the full anharmonic system with so(3 ) symmetry , and in the limit @xmath1 ( or energy ) @xmath4 restores the ho trace formula with u(3 ) symmetry . we demonstrate that the gross - shell structure of this anharmonically perturbed system is dominated by the two - fold degenerate diameter and circular orbits , and _ not _ by the orbits with the largest classical degeneracy , which are the three - fold degenerate tori with rational ratios @xmath5 of radial and angular frequencies . the same holds also for the limit of a purely quartic spherical potential @xmath6 ." ]
14,467
14,467
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in recent years , the investigations of non - intersecting brownian motion and random walk paths focused on the description of a critical process called the tacnode process . this process appears when two groups of trajectories are asymptotically supported in two ellipses in the time - space plane such that the ellipses touch each other creating a tacnode ( self - touching point ) of the macroscopic boundary . the aim is to describe the behaviour of the paths near the touching point . a series of recent papers by different groups of authors studied the tacnode process in parallel using various methods . the first result in this direction is due to adler , ferrari and van moerbeke : in @xcite , a model of non - intersecting random walk paths is considered such that the paths form a symmetric tacnode . in @xcite , delvaux , kuijlaars and zhang studied the non - symmetric case of non - intersecting brownian trajectories and they expressed the critical correlation kernel in terms of the solution of a @xmath2 riemann hilbert problem . a different approach to the brownian case is due to johansson who gave a formula for the tacnode kernel in terms of the resolvent of the airy kernel in @xcite in the symmetric case . the latter approach was extended by ferrari and vet in @xcite to the general non - symmetric case . the tacnode process was also obtained in the tiling problem of the double aztec diamond by adler , johansson and van moerbeke in @xcite . it was not a priori clear that the various formulas for the tacnode kernel give rise to the same limit process , since the results in @xcite , @xcite and @xcite contain airy resolvent type formulas whereas the kernel in @xcite is expressed with the solution of a riemann hilbert problem . it was shown in @xcite that the formulation of @xcite and @xcite are equivalent . a more recent result @xcite gives the equivalence of the riemann hilbert formulas in @xcite and the airy resolvent formulas in @xcite and @xcite . apart from systems of non - intersecting brownian motions and random walk paths , the study of non - intersecting squared bessel paths is also natural due to their representation as eigenvalues of the laguerre process , see @xcite . this process is a positive definite matrix valued brownian bridges . since the transition kernel of the squared bessel paths can be given explicitly via modified bessel functions , see , a karlin mcgregor type formula like can be applied . non - intersecting squared bessel paths were also studied by katori and tanemura in @xcite , but the first description of the hard edge tacnode process is due to delvaux @xcite . the formation of the tacnode in this case is slightly different : instead of two touching groups of trajectories in the time - space plane , only one group of paths is considered and its boundary macroscopically touches the hard edge , i.e. the @xmath3 line . this configuration is referred to as the hard edge tacnode and the critical process in the neighbourhood of the touching point is called the hard edge tacnode process . in @xcite , the correlation kernel of the hard edge tacnode process is expressed in terms of the solution of a @xmath2 riemann hilbert problem which is different from the one that appears in the case of the brownian trajectories . see the left - hand side of figure [ fig : simulation ] for non - intersecting squared bessel paths with the tacnode scaling of the starting and endpoints . for further figures , see also @xcite . in theorem [ thm : hardedgetacnode ] which is the main result of the present paper we provide an explicit airy type formula for the multi - time correlation kernel of the hard edge tacnode process , under the assumption that the parameter @xmath4 of the bessel process is a ( non - negative ) integer . the kernel is expressed as a double complex integral , see . the formula is completely new in the literature . it is reminiscent to the usual tacnode kernel , but the airy resolvent operator on @xmath0 is replaced by an operator which acts on the direct sum space of @xmath0 and a finite dimensional space . a different phenomenon appears when the starting points of the non - intersecting squared bessel paths are taken to be @xmath1 and the endpoints are scaled linearly with the number of paths . in this case , there is a critical time such that for any earlier time the lowest path stays close to @xmath1 whereas for any later time the distance of the lowest path from @xmath1 is macroscopic . after rescaling around the critical time , one obtains the hard edge pearcey process , see the right - hand side of figure [ fig : simulation ] . the single time hard edge pearcey kernel was already described by desrosiers and forrester @xcite and later in a different formulation by kuijlaars , martnez - finkelshtein and wielonsky @xcite . we give the multi - time correlation kernel of the hard edge pearcey process in different formulations in theorems [ thm : hardedgepearcey ] and [ thm : pearcey : alternative ] which also shows the equivalence of the formulas in @xcite and @xcite . in corollary [ cor : bk ] , we obtain the kernel by borodin and kuan @xcite in the special case of one - dimensional squared bessel paths , i.e. of absolute values of one - dimensional brownian motions . the main steps how the convergence of the kernel of @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel paths to that of the hard edge tacnode is proved are the following . first we write the kernel as a double complex contour integral using the representation of the modified bessel function . the integrand can be transformed into the ratio of two toeplitz determinants of sizes @xmath6 and @xmath5 respectively . the toeplitz determinants have symbols with non - zero winding numbers around @xmath1 , hence we apply a generalized borodin okounkov formula due to bttcher and widom in @xcite to obtain theorem [ theorem : toeplitz ] if the parameter @xmath7 of the squared bessel paths is a ( non - negative ) integer . then we obtain the ratio of two fredholm type determinants where the two operators are rank one perturbations of each other . this yields a resolvent type formula in theorem [ theorem : kernel : n ] which is suitable for asymptotic analysis . the functions that appear in the finite @xmath5 kernel can be rewritten in terms of bessel functions , hence the asymptotic analysis relies on the convergence of bessel functions which is proved separately in the appendix . now we introduce the model of non - intersecting squared bessel paths that we consider . the squared bessel process depends on a parameter @xmath8 . the transition probability of the squared bessel process for any time @xmath9 is defined by @xmath10 for @xmath11 and @xmath12 where @xmath13 is the modified bessel function which can be given by the series @xmath14 the transition probability @xmath15 is obtained by taking the limit @xmath16 . if @xmath17 is an integer , then the squared bessel process can be obtained as the squared absolute value of a @xmath18-dimensional brownian motion . in this case , we call @xmath18 the dimension of the squared bessel process . in the present paper , we consider non - intersecting squared bessel paths which start from one fixed point and end at another fixed point . in order to construct this system of paths , we first take @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel paths with fixed different starting points @xmath19 at time @xmath20 and fixed different ending points @xmath21 at time @xmath22 . the paths are conditioned to be non - intersecting in the time interval @xmath23 . it is well known that this defines an extended determinantal point process . that is , the joint probability at a sequence of times @xmath24 can be expressed via the determinant of an extended correlation kernel @xmath25 . the kernel @xmath26 is defined in terms of the transition probability @xmath27 in . namely as given also in ( * ? ? ? * eq . ( 1.1 ) ) , we have @xmath28 for any positions @xmath29 and times @xmath30 with @xmath31 denoting the characteristic function of @xmath32 and with @xmath33 defined as the @xmath34 matrix @xmath35 next we take the confluent limit of the starting and ending points @xmath36 and @xmath37 . if @xmath38 and @xmath39 are suitably scaled with the number @xmath5 of the paths , we can create a picture in the time - space plane with a cusp or a tacnode at the hard edge . in this paper , we obtain the limiting extended correlation kernel of non - intersecting squared bessel paths near the tacnode and the cusp which we call the hard edge tacnode process and the hard edge pearcey process . the paper is organized as follows . we first state our main results in section [ s : mainres ] . the correlation kernel @xmath26 is expressed as a ratio of two toeplitz determinants and in a pre - asymptotic form for finite @xmath5 in subsection [ ss : finiten ] . then two different scalings and the corresponding limit processes are considered : the hard edge tacnode process is introduced and discussed along with our results on the convergence in subsections [ ss : hetacnode ] and [ ss : alt_tacnode ] . the hard edge pearcey process with different formulations of its correlation kernel and our results are given in subsection [ ss : hepearcey ] . the finite @xmath5 formulas for the kernel @xmath26 are proved in section [ s : derivation_finite ] . the asymptotic analysis for the hard edge tacnode process is performed in section [ s : analysis_tacnode ] , the one for the hard edge pearcey process is in section [ s : analysis_pearcey ] . the alternative hard edge pearcey formulas are proved in section [ s : alternative_pearcey ] . the proof of proposition [ prop : limschur ] which is needed for the existence of the given formulation of the hard edge tacnode kernel is postponed to section [ s : asymptinv ] . section [ s : bessel_limit ] of the appendix contains a statement about the convergence of the derivatives of bessel functions to those of the airy function and useful tail bounds . we first report our formulas for @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel paths for @xmath5 finite . next we describe the limits under the tacnode and the pearcey scaling . in what follows , we will assume that the parameter @xmath7 of the squared bessel process is a ( non - negative ) integer . see however remark [ remark : nonint ] where we state an extension of one of our results for finite @xmath5 to the case of non - integer @xmath7 . define the weight function @xmath40 on the unit circle @xmath41 with parameters @xmath42 . we abbreviate @xmath43 where @xmath44 denote the starting and ending point of the non - intersecting squared bessel paths . we also define the weight function @xmath45 where @xmath46 are free parameters for the moment , but they will depend on the integration variables in as given by below . first , we express the kernel of @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel paths as a double integral where the integrand is a ratio of two toeplitz determinants . the proof of the theorem is given in section [ subsection : proof : theorem : toeplitz ] . [ theorem : toeplitz ] let @xmath7 be an integer and consider @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel paths of parameter @xmath7 with starting point @xmath47 and ending point @xmath39 . then the extended correlation kernel can be written as @xmath48 where @xmath49 denotes the unit circle in the complex plane , oriented counterclockwise and @xmath50 is a ratio of two toeplitz determinants with weight functions @xmath51 and @xmath52 defined in with @xmath53 [ remark : nonint ] theorem [ theorem : toeplitz ] can be extended to arbitrary real values of the parameter @xmath7 ( @xmath8 ) , not necessarily integer . to that end , it suffices to replace both integration contours @xmath49 in by a contour @xmath54 where @xmath54 is a contour encircling the origin in counterclockwise direction , beginning at and returning to @xmath55 , and never intersecting the negative real line except at @xmath55 . the contour @xmath54 is the negative of the standard ` hankel contour ' . we then assume that all powers in the formulas have a branch cut along the negative real axis . note that in the special case where @xmath7 is integer , the integration over the contour @xmath54 can be replaced by an integration over the unit circle @xmath49 and then we retrieve the formula stated in theorem [ theorem : toeplitz ] above . the proof of the extension to non - integer @xmath7 is similar to the one of theorem [ theorem : toeplitz ] given in section [ subsection : proof : theorem : toeplitz ] , by noting that holds for non - integer values of @xmath4 provided that the integration contour @xmath49 is replaced by the contour @xmath54 described above . we omit the details . unfortunately , we were unable to apply an asymptotic analysis to the toeplitz determinants for this generalized setting with @xmath4 non - integer , therefore we will always assume below that @xmath4 is integer . in order to calculate the asymptotics of the toeplitz determinants in , we apply a borodin okounkov type formula . note that the symbols of our toeplitz matrices have winding number @xmath7 around the origin , which is in general non - zero . a borodin okounkov type formula in this setting is described by bttcher widom @xcite . the formulas in @xcite allow to write each toeplitz determinant as the fredholm determinant of an operator on @xmath56 times a determinant of size @xmath57 . alternatively , we will see that the toeplitz determinant can be expressed via the fredholm determinant of a _ single _ operator acting on the direct sum space @xmath58 fix @xmath59 . we define a block matrix operator of size @xmath60 @xmath61 which we view as the matrix representation of a linear operator acting on the space @xmath62 with respect to the natural basis of @xmath62 . the block matrix decomposition is compatible with the direct sum decomposition of @xmath62 . let us describe the four blocks of . we will denote by @xmath63 the circle with radius @xmath64 . * @xmath33 is a semi - infinite matrix with @xmath65th entry @xmath66 for @xmath67 . * @xmath68 is a matrix of size @xmath69 with @xmath65th entry given by @xmath70 for @xmath71 . * @xmath54 is a toeplitz matrix of size @xmath72 with @xmath65th entry @xmath73 * @xmath74 is a toeplitz matrix of size @xmath75 with @xmath65th entry given by @xmath76 next we define two vectors in the space @xmath62 . the vectors will depend on parameters @xmath77 which we consider for the moment to be fixed numbers such that @xmath78 and @xmath79 . denote again by @xmath63 the circle of radius @xmath80 which we now take such that @xmath81 . we define @xmath82 to be the column vectors of length @xmath83 and @xmath4 respectively with @xmath84th entry @xmath85 let @xmath86 be the row vector of length @xmath83 with @xmath87th entry @xmath88 and we define @xmath89 as the row vector of length @xmath4 given by @xmath90 with these notations , let @xmath91 where the matrix is the same as the one given in and the entries of the two vectors are defined in and respectively . the block matrix and block vector notation is again compatible with the direct sum decomposition of the space @xmath62 given in . the inverse of the block matrix in the above formula can again be partitioned as a block matrix of size @xmath60 : @xmath92 where @xmath93 is the schur complement of @xmath33 . hence the invertibility of the block matrix in follows from the invertibility of @xmath33 and @xmath94 . it is not clear a priori that the block matrix in the definition of @xmath95 in is invertible , but as it will be seen later in proposition [ prop : limschur ] for the tacnode scaling and in for the pearcey scaling , we get invertible matrices in these two limits . therefore , @xmath95 is certainly well - defined if the parameters are close enough to any of these limits . [ theorem : inner : product ] the ratio of toeplitz determinants in can be written as @xmath96 where @xmath95 is given above by . the proof of the theorem is given in section [ subsection : proof : theorem : bo ] . [ def : contour : xi : eta ] we denote by @xmath97 and @xmath98 counterclockwise oriented closed contours as follows . @xmath97 is a loop encircling @xmath1 but not the points @xmath99 and @xmath100 . @xmath98 consists of two pieces : a loop encircling @xmath1 lying at the inside of @xmath97 , and a small loop surrounding the point at @xmath101 lying at the outside of @xmath97 . a particular choice is shown later in figure [ fig : xietacontours ] . [ theorem : kernel : n ] under the same assumptions as in theorem [ theorem : toeplitz ] , the correlation kernel @xmath26 for @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel paths can be written as @xmath102 where @xmath95 is defined by and the contours @xmath98 and @xmath97 are given in definition [ def : contour : xi : eta ] . it turns out that it is more convenient for our purposes to work with @xmath103 when we consider the hard edge tacnode process . the free parameter @xmath104 will parametrize the location of the hard edge tacnode process , however @xmath105 will disappear from the limit process . [ def : tacscale ] let the _ tacnode scaling _ be the scaling when time and space are scaled according to @xmath106 and the starting and ending points are rescaled by @xmath107 where @xmath108 is the _ temperature parameter_. for @xmath108 , we define the shifted airy kernel by @xmath109 to state the result about the limiting kernel , we define the function @xmath110 and the two - variate functions ( with @xmath111 denoting the @xmath84th derivative of the airy function ) @xmath112 the matrix component @xmath113 always appears with a subscript throughout this paper in order to avoid confusions with the set of complex numbers . let @xmath114 and for any function @xmath115 or @xmath116 , we define the column vector on the space @xmath117 @xmath118=\begin{pmatrix } ( f(x))_{x\in{\mathbb{r}}_+ } & f(x)|_{x=0 } & \frac{{\partial}}{{\partial}x } f(x)|_{x=0 } & \ldots & \frac{{\partial}^{{\alpha}-1}}{{\partial}x^{{\alpha}-1 } } f(x)|_{x=0 } \end{pmatrix}^t.\ ] ] finally define @xmath119.\ ] ] [ def : contours ] the contours depend on real parameters @xmath120 but we will not indicate this dependence in the notation . let @xmath121 be a jordan arc in the complex plane which comes from @xmath122 , goes to @xmath123 and it crosses the real axis on the right of @xmath124 and @xmath125 . let @xmath126 consist of two pieces : a jordan arc in the complex plane coming from @xmath127 and going to @xmath128 , lying to the right of @xmath121 , and a clockwise oriented small loop around @xmath124 , lying to the left of @xmath121 . a possible choice of these contours can be seen in figure [ fig : hxicontours ] . let @xmath129 be the hard edge tacnode kernel where the integration contours are given in definition [ def : contours ] and the function @xmath130 is defined by . the next theorem will be proved in section [ s : analysis_tacnode ] . [ thm : hardedgetacnode ] let @xmath7 be a non - negative integer . 1 . under the tacnode scaling given by definition [ def : tacscale ] , the sequence of rescaled kernels converges @xmath131 uniformly as @xmath132 and @xmath133 are in a compact subset of @xmath134 where @xmath135 and the kernel on the right - hand side of is defined by . 2 . as a consequence , the hard edge tacnode process @xmath136 exists as the limit of @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel processes under the tacnode scaling . it is characterized by the following gap probabilities . for any fixed @xmath84 and @xmath137 and for any compact set @xmath138 , @xmath139 in the definition of the kernel @xmath140 in , we implicitly assume that the limiting block matrix is invertible . equivalently , the limiting schur complement @xmath141 should be invertible . this follows from proposition [ prop : limschur ] below for @xmath142 large enough . let @xmath143 be the integral operator on @xmath144 with kernel @xmath145 note that @xmath146 and the matrices in can also be easily expressed in terms of the operator @xmath143 as @xmath147 we will use the following general notation in the sequel : if @xmath148 is a smooth function on @xmath149 , we denote the kernel of the integral operator @xmath150 on @xmath144 by @xmath151 . in particular , we have @xmath152 in below . straightforward substitution of into yields the following . [ lemma : schur : repr ] 1 . the schur complement @xmath153 in can be represented as @xmath154 2 . the schur complement @xmath153 is a symmetric matrix . in particular , for @xmath155 the schur complement takes the scalar form @xmath156 it is well - known @xcite that this is equal to @xmath157 where @xmath105 is the hastings mcleod solution to the painlev ii equation . the invertibility of the schur complement then amounts to the fact that @xmath158 for all @xmath159 . we conjecture that it holds more generally . [ conj : schur : inv ] the schur complement is invertible for all @xmath159 . let us prove conjecture [ conj : schur : inv ] under the assumption that @xmath160 is large enough . note that for @xmath161 the operator @xmath162 tends exponentially fast to the identity operator . hence the @xmath65th entry of the matrix is approximated by @xmath163 we will prove the following proposition in section [ s : asymptinv ] . [ prop : limschur ] 1 . let @xmath5 be fixed . we have the asymptotics @xmath164 for @xmath165 where @xmath166 means that the ratio of the two sides goes to @xmath167 . the schur complement @xmath153 is invertible for all @xmath160 large enough . we take the derivative of the kernel with respect to the temperature parameter @xmath142 . it turns out that this derivative has a convenient form : it is a rank 1 kernel . the proof of this fact is a rather lengthy calculation which we omit here , hence we give the next theorem without proof . [ theorem : temp : der ] the derivative of the hard edge tacnode kernel with respect to @xmath142 is a rank 1 kernel , that is @xmath168 if @xmath169 , then @xmath170 and they both are given by the contour integral @xmath171 if @xmath172 , then the function @xmath173 is given by @xmath174\ ] ] and @xmath175 can be represented as @xmath176\right].\end{gathered}\ ] ] the functions @xmath173 and @xmath175 are the same . the conjecture holds for @xmath169 trivially , the @xmath177 case can still be checked by rewriting the functions in schur complement forms . for general @xmath7 , it is more complicated . the equality of the two functions @xmath178 and @xmath179 follows from the hidden symmetry of the kernel . integration of with respect to the temperature yields the following . the hard edge tacnode kernel can be written as @xmath180 finally , we show how the block matrix notations in the above formulas can be avoided . we show this first for the function @xmath130 . let us use the notation @xmath181 for the exponential function for any @xmath182 and let @xmath183 be the usual scalar product of functions @xmath148 and @xmath184 in @xmath0 . observe that with this notation @xmath185 [ lemma : mschur ] we can rewrite the function @xmath130 in with the notation of and as @xmath186 here the two expressions between large parentheses @xmath187 denote a row and a column vector respectively , both of length @xmath4 . in a very similar way , one can express the functions @xmath178 and @xmath179 without the block matrix notation . [ rem : cafasso ] in the @xmath169 case after the change of variables @xmath188 and @xmath189 , the kernel in restricted to single time reads @xmath190 the contour @xmath191 is a clockwise curve that has a cusp at the origin such that it leaves the origin in the @xmath192 direction , it crosses the positive real axes and it returns to the origin from the @xmath193 direction . the other contour @xmath194 consists of two parts : the first one is a clockwise loop inside @xmath191 and it has a cusp at the origin such that it leaves the origin in the @xmath195 direction and it returns to the origin from the @xmath196 direction ; the other part is a counterclockwise circle around @xmath191 . the kernel in with a further change of variables is a special case of the single time kernels of the form @xmath197 where @xmath198 is a rational function in @xmath199 which depends on the parameter @xmath132 linearly , i.e. @xmath200 . in this case , @xmath201 is a third order rational function . in the hard edge pearcey case , it is a second order function , see corollary [ cor : kmw ] below and also @xcite . as discussed in @xcite , to the type of kernels with some further restrictions on @xmath201 , one can associate a riemann hilbert problem which was used in @xcite to express the gap probabilities in terms of the tau function of the riemann hilbert problem . it is natural to ask about the existence of a corresponding riemann hilbert problem in the present case . here we consider the non - intersecting squared bessel paths which all start from @xmath1 . more precisely , let @xmath202 be the confluent limit of the kernel of @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel processes as the starting points tend to @xmath1 . this means that @xmath203 is the correlation kernel for @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel processes conditioned to start at @xmath1 at time @xmath1 and end at positions @xmath204 at time @xmath167 . this is similar to the situation considered by kuijlaars , martnez - finkelshtein and wielonsky ( * ? ? ? [ prop : confluent : a0 ] for any real @xmath8 , the kernel @xmath205 in has the double integral representation @xmath206 where the @xmath207-contour @xmath208 is an counterclockwise loop surrounding the points @xmath209 and being disjoint from the @xmath210-contour @xmath211 $ ] . the branch for @xmath212 is defined by @xmath213 and along the contour @xmath208 , we use the extension of @xmath214 from the positive real axis . this proposition is closely related to a result by katori tanemura ( * ? ? ? * theorem 2.1 ) . it can also be considered as the hard edge analogue of tracy widom ( * ? ? ? * eq . ( 2.11 ) ) . for completeness we will provide a proof of the proposition in section [ s : analysis_pearcey ] the confluent limit of the endpoints @xmath215 for @xmath216 is simply obtained by substituting it in . if we choose @xmath217 where @xmath104 is a free parameter , then the region filled by the trajectories of the bessel processes behaves as follows . for any time @xmath218 , the lowest path stays close to @xmath1 whereas for @xmath219 , its distance from @xmath1 is macroscopic . our main focus is the neighbourhood of @xmath220 under the following scaling where the hard edge pearcey process is observed . [ def : peascaling ] let the _ pearcey scaling _ be the following scaling of the parameters . we consider @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel paths , take the confluent limit as all the starting points are @xmath1 and the endpoints are equal to @xmath217 with a free parameter @xmath104 and we rescale time and space variables @xmath221 and @xmath133 as @xmath222 respectively . ( we make this rescaling for all the considered time and space variables . ) we define the hard edge pearcey kernel by @xmath223 where @xmath54 is the contour which consists of two rays : one from @xmath224 to @xmath1 and one from @xmath1 to @xmath225 . in the single time case @xmath226 , the above kernel essentially reduces to the one of desrosiers forrester ( * ? ? ? 5 ) which was also discussed in the last paragraph of ( * ? ? ? * sec . 1 ) . applying an asymptotic analysis to the double integral formula in proposition [ prop : confluent : a0 ] similarly to ( * ? ? ? iii ) , we obtain the multi - time extension of the hard edge pearcey process . [ thm : hardedgepearcey ] let @xmath8 . the hard edge pearcey process @xmath227 is obtained as the limit of @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel processes starting at @xmath1 at time @xmath1 and ending at @xmath217 at time @xmath167 under the time - space scaling . it is defined by the following gap probabilities . for any fixed @xmath84 and @xmath137 and for any compact set @xmath138 , @xmath228 where @xmath229 is the hard edge pearcey kernel given by . [ rem : pearceysigmadep ] it is not hard to see from the proof of theorem [ thm : hardedgepearcey ] that if we set @xmath230 for some fixed @xmath159 , then the correlation kernel of the hard edge pearcey process becomes @xmath231 . similarly as before , one can think of @xmath142 as a _ temperature _ parameter . for non - negative integer values of @xmath7 , we can use our methods involving toeplitz determinants to obtain an alternative formulation of the kernel @xmath232 . the following result is proved in section [ s : alternative_pearcey ] . [ thm : pearcey : alternative ] if @xmath7 is a non - negative integer , then we can write @xmath229 in as @xmath233 where @xmath234 is a clockwise oriented circle surrounding the singularity at @xmath124 , and @xmath235 is chosen such that the contour @xmath236 passes to the right of the singularity at @xmath125 and to the right of the contour @xmath234 . [ rem : pearcy : nonint ] although we derive it only if @xmath4 is a non - negative integer , formula makes sense for any real @xmath237 with a few minor modifications . in that case , we replace @xmath234 by a clockwise oriented closed loop which intersects the real line at a point to the right of @xmath124 , and also at @xmath124 itself where it has a cusp at angle @xmath238 . we then take the principal branches of the powers @xmath239 , @xmath240 , i.e. , with a branch cut along the negative half - line . see also remark [ remark : kmw : noninteger ] . in the single time case @xmath241 , the kernel @xmath232 in can be further reduced to the kernel of kuijlaars , martnez finkelshtein and wielonsky , as stated in ( * ? ? ? * eq . ( 1.19 ) ) : @xmath242 where @xmath243 is a clockwise circle in the left half - plane touching zero along the imaginary axis , and @xmath244 is a counterclockwise loop surrounding @xmath243 . [ cor : kmw ] in the single time case @xmath241 , the kernel @xmath232 in reduces to @xmath245 as a consequence of theorem [ thm : hardedgepearcey ] in the special case of @xmath246 , we recover the process described by borodin and kuan @xcite via the kernel @xmath247 as follows . [ cor : bk ] for @xmath246 , let us choose @xmath248 then the hard edge pearcey process with the above change of the space and time variables is the same as the borodin kuan process , that is , their kernels satisfy the relation @xmath249 we assume above that the non - intersecting paths start at @xmath250 and end at @xmath217 . instead we could let them start at @xmath251 and end at @xmath252 . this leads to an alternate hard - edge pearcey process that we could denote by the superscript @xmath253 . the corresponding kernels are related by @xmath254 note that the prefactor @xmath255 is just a conjugation of the kernel , hence the two kernels give rise to essentially the same correlation functions . note that this prefactor also appears in the right - hand side of . the equivalence of the two formulas and for the kernel @xmath229 can be seen directly as follows . in both formulations , it can be shown that the derivative of the kernel with respect to the parameter @xmath142 factorizes as @xmath256 where the functions @xmath257 solve the third - order ode s @xmath258 where the prime denotes the derivative with respect to the space variable @xmath132 or @xmath133 . by using this fact and also some extra information to determine the relevant solutions to the ode s , one can prove that the functions @xmath257 in are the same for both formulations of the kernel @xmath232 , and hence the kernels and themselves are equal as well . we leave the details to the interested reader . we note that if @xmath259 the functions @xmath257 in also satisfy the pde s @xmath260 in this section , we prove the different formulations of the kernel @xmath26 stated in theorems [ theorem : toeplitz ] , [ theorem : inner : product ] and [ theorem : kernel : n ] . the proof of theorem [ theorem : toeplitz ] consists of two steps . first we express the quantity @xmath261 as a christoffel darboux kernel , then we rewrite it as the ratio of two toeplitz determinants . [ [ step-1 . ] ] step 1 . + + + + + + + let us take the confluent limit of the starting and ending points @xmath262 and @xmath37 . the expression reduces to @xmath263 where @xmath264 since we assumed that @xmath7 is an integer , the integral representation for the modified bessel function @xmath265 holds where @xmath49 denotes the unit circle . therefore , the transition probability can be written as @xmath266 with the weight function on the unit circle @xmath267 . we can then evaluate the quantities in : @xmath268 and @xmath269 inserting these expressions in the kernel and using the linearity of matrix multiplication , we find @xmath270 with @xmath271 where @xmath272 and @xmath273 are arbitrary polynomials of degree @xmath274 and @xmath84 respectively . note that the factors @xmath275 in the denominators in cancel each other . so we obtain the formula , but with @xmath276 there replaced by the christoffel darboux kernel @xmath277 with again the notation and . by taking @xmath278 and @xmath279 , this reduces to @xmath280 where @xmath281 note that @xmath33 is a toeplitz matrix . [ [ step-2 . ] ] step 2 . + + + + + + + next we express the christoffel darboux kernel @xmath276 in as a ratio of two toeplitz determinants . we discuss this in a broader context . let @xmath51 be an arbitrary weight function on the unit circle @xmath49 . define the moments @xmath282 for @xmath283 . obviously the moments @xmath284 depend only on the difference @xmath285 . so they satisfy the toeplitz property @xmath286 but we will not use this for the moment . let @xmath287 be the moment matrix , i.e. , the toeplitz matrix . with the setting of the last paragraph , consider the christoffel darboux kernel . it can be written as a ratio of two toeplitz determinants @xmath288 with the moments @xmath284 given in and @xmath289 which also satisfy the toeplitz property @xmath290 . the definition of the christoffel darboux kernel is equivalent with @xmath291 which in turn yields the determinantal formula @xmath292 the denominator of is a toeplitz determinant . we want to achieve the same for the determinant in the numerator . to this end we apply a series of elementary row and column operations . from the @xmath274th row we subtract @xmath293 times the @xmath294st row for @xmath295 , and from the @xmath84th column we subtract @xmath296 times the @xmath297st column for @xmath298 . these operations kill all the entries in the last row and column except for the entries @xmath299 and @xmath300 . hence the determinant factorizes as @xmath301 times the determinant obtained by skipping the last two rows and columns . the lemma follows . note that @xmath302 are expressed as moments @xmath303 where the weight function @xmath52 is given in . this proves , which ends the proof of theorem [ theorem : toeplitz ] . we prove theorem [ theorem : inner : product ] in three steps . first we apply a borodin okounkov type formula for the toeplitz determinants , then we rewrite the ratio of determinants , finally we use the rank one structure to obtain the assertion . [ [ step-1.-1 ] ] step 1 . + + + + + + + we express both toeplitz determinants in via a borodin okounkov type formula , in the formulation of bttcher widom @xcite . let @xmath5 be a fixed integer . recall the semi - infinite matrix @xmath33 in , viewed as an operator on @xmath56 , and similarly define @xmath304 by . both operators @xmath33 and @xmath304 are a trace class perturbation of the identity operator on @xmath56 so their fredholm determinants @xmath305 , @xmath306 are well - defined . then we obtain the following factorizations . [ thm : borodin : okounkov ] with the above notations , the following is true . 1 . the toeplitz determinant in the numerator of can be factorized as @xmath307 where @xmath308 and @xmath309 will be defined in . 2 . the toeplitz determinant in the denominator of can be factorized as @xmath310 where @xmath311 and @xmath312 will be defined in the proof . the second part follows from the first by taking the limit @xmath313 , @xmath314 and replacing @xmath5 by @xmath315 . so it suffices to prove the first part of the lemma . it will be convenient for us to replace the weight function @xmath52 in the left hand side of by @xmath316 . note that this is equivalent to a conjugation of the toeplitz matrix by the diagonal matrix @xmath317 , which does not affect the value of the determinant . moreover , we multiply the weight function @xmath316 by the prefactor @xmath318 ; this prefactor multiplies the toeplitz determinant in by the factor @xmath319 , but this factor will cancel out later . we use the setting in bttcher widom @xcite . with the notations in that paper , the weight function of the toeplitz determinant is @xmath320 on the unit circle @xmath41 . note the changes of signs compared to by the replacement of @xmath52 with @xmath316 , and note that @xmath207 turned into @xmath321 due to the conventions in @xcite . we have the wiener hopf factorization @xmath322 with @xmath323 where @xmath324 are analytic inside and outside the unit circle respectively and we normalized them as in bttcher widom ( * ? ? ? * eq . ( 1 ) ) . following ( * ? ? ? * page 2 ) , set @xmath325 hence @xmath326 let @xmath327 , @xmath328 be the semi - infinite hankel matrices associated to the symbols @xmath329 and @xmath330 respectively . the row and column indices of these matrices are labelled by @xmath331 . from ( * ? ? ? * theorems 1.1 and 1.3 ) ( with @xmath5 replaced by @xmath6 and with @xmath332 ) , we obtain the required formula for appropriately defined @xmath333 ( see below ) , but with the final factor @xmath334 in replaced by the fredholm determinant @xmath335 where @xmath336 denotes the projection matrix @xmath337 with @xmath338 being the sequence of @xmath1s of length @xmath84 . ( note that the prefactor @xmath339 in ( * ? ? ? * theorem 1.3 ) cancels out with the one at the end of the first paragraph of the present proof , see above . ) we calculate the product of hankel matrices @xmath340 in . its @xmath65th entry , @xmath341 , is given by @xmath342 times @xmath343 hence the @xmath65th entry of @xmath344 is given by @xmath345 which corresponds with our definition of @xmath304 in up to a shift of the indices @xmath346 by @xmath347 . therefore the fredholm determinant equals @xmath348 as desired . next , the expressions for @xmath349 and @xmath350 are easily calculated from bttcher widom @xcite ( keeping in mind formula above ) : @xmath351 and @xmath352 as desired . finally , we discuss the quantity @xmath309 . from ( * ? ? ? * eq . ( 4 ) ) , we have @xmath353 where @xmath354 where again @xmath355 denotes the projection matrix @xmath356 with @xmath357 being the sequence of @xmath1s of length @xmath5 . the quantity @xmath358 can be defined similarly . it is also obtained as the limit of @xmath359 as @xmath360 and @xmath314 . from lemma [ thm : borodin : okounkov ] we obtain [ theorem : bo ] the ratio of toeplitz determinants in can be written as @xmath361 [ [ step-2.-1 ] ] step 2 . + + + + + + + we express the last factor in corollary [ theorem : bo ] via the determinants of certain block matrices , i.e. determinants on the space @xmath62 . fix @xmath59 . we define a block matrix operator @xmath362 of size @xmath60 . let us describe the four blocks . denote again by @xmath63 the circle with radius @xmath80 which we choose such that @xmath81 . * @xmath304 is a semi - infinite matrix with @xmath65th entry @xmath363 for @xmath67 . * @xmath364 is a matrix of size @xmath69 with @xmath65th entry given by , but with the @xmath365 term removed and the factor @xmath366 replaced by @xmath367 for @xmath368 and @xmath369 . * @xmath370 is a toeplitz matrix of size @xmath72 with @xmath65th entry @xmath371 for @xmath372 and @xmath373 . * @xmath374 is a toeplitz matrix of size @xmath75 with @xmath65th entry given by , but with the factor @xmath375 replaced by @xmath376 for @xmath377 . by taking the limit @xmath378 and replacing @xmath5 by @xmath315 in the above formulas for @xmath379 , we retrieve the formulas for the matrices @xmath380 . [ prop : block : matrix ] with the above notations , the last factor in corollary [ theorem : bo ] can be written as @xmath381 where the constant @xmath382 is the same in both formulas . we only prove , the other identity being similar . we recall the general matrix identity @xmath383 for arbitrary matrices @xmath384 with compatible dimensions and @xmath385 invertible . we will apply this identity with the matrices @xmath386 in and @xmath387 . then the left - hand side of reduces to @xmath388 by virtue of . on the other hand , the right - hand side of can be reduced to@xmath389 with @xmath390 . [ [ step-3 . ] ] step 3 . + + + + + + + we relate the block matrices via a rank 1 formula . let @xmath391 be the upper triangular toeplitz matrix @xmath392 [ prop : rank1:alpha ] the block matrices in proposition [ prop : block : matrix ] satisfy the identity @xmath393 where the right - hand side of is a rank @xmath167 matrix and we used the notations . recall the matrices @xmath370 and @xmath391 in and respectively . the @xmath65th entry of @xmath394 is given by @xmath395\notag\\ & = \frac{1}{2\pi { \mathbf{i}}}\int_{s_1}{\,\mathrm{d}}w\,\frac{w^{-(k+n+{\alpha}+1)}}{w+\eta}\exp\left(\frac{bw - aw^{-1}}{2}\right)\notag\\ & \qquad\qquad\times\left[(w+\xi)w^l-(\xi-\eta)(w^{l}-(-\xi)^l)\right]\label{proof : rank1:1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for @xmath372 and @xmath373 . on the other hand , the @xmath65th entry of @xmath54 is given by @xmath396.\ ] ] subtracting from and cancelling terms , we find @xmath397.\ ] ] this proves the matrix equality @xmath398 on account of and . in a similar way , one shows that @xmath399 which yields the second block column of . finally , from the identity @xmath400 one obtains the matrix equation @xmath401 on account of . this yields the first block column of . [ lemma : rankone : doublesum ] the last factor in corollary [ theorem : bo ] can be written as @xmath402 this follows from propositions [ prop : block : matrix ] and [ prop : rank1:alpha ] . theorem [ theorem : inner : product ] is now an easy consequence of corollary [ theorem : bo ] and corollary [ lemma : rankone : doublesum ] . this ends the proof of theorem [ theorem : inner : product ] . in what follows , we show that @xmath403 where @xmath95 is defined in where in the definitions of @xmath404 in we now take the circle radius @xmath80 such that @xmath405 and where the contours @xmath406 and @xmath407 are as follows . let @xmath406 and @xmath407 denote counterclockwise oriented closed contours such that @xmath78 and @xmath79 holds for all @xmath408 and @xmath409 and such that @xmath406 encircles @xmath1 but it does not encircle the points @xmath99 and @xmath100 and @xmath407 does surround the points @xmath99 and @xmath100 . see figure [ fig : primecontours ] for illustration . as a first step for proving , we combine theorems [ theorem : toeplitz ] and [ theorem : inner : product ] along with and to get @xmath410 where we recall that @xmath46 are defined in terms of @xmath411 by . next we show that the circle radius @xmath80 in the definitions of @xmath404 can be taken as in . recall that we had @xmath81 in the original definitions of @xmath404 in . if we enlarge @xmath80 as in , then a residue term will be picked up in each of these definitions . these residue terms ( ignoring the signs ) are given by @xmath412 we claim that the contributions from these residue terms all drop out when inserting them in the double integral via . note that the dependence on @xmath293 and @xmath413 ( that is , on @xmath414 and @xmath415 ) factorizes in the second term of if we substitute it in . hence in the second term , we can separate the @xmath414 and the @xmath415 integrals . first , we show that the contribution coming from the residue @xmath416 vanishes . note that there are essential cancellations when we multiply by the @xmath415 ( and @xmath413 ) dependent factors in . the resulting contribution written as an @xmath413 integral is @xmath417 where the integration contour is the image of the unit circle under , that is the circle of radius @xmath418 around @xmath99 . note that the integrand is analytic outside this circle ( also at @xmath83 ) , hence we can blow up the contour and conclude that the integral is @xmath1 by cauchy s theorem . the argument for @xmath419 is similar , for @xmath420 after the change from @xmath414 to @xmath293 according to , we can shrink the contour to @xmath1 . next we change the integration variables @xmath411 in the double integral in to @xmath46 as defined in . the integration contours also transform under , i.e. the contour for @xmath293 becomes the circle of radius @xmath421 around @xmath422 and the contour for @xmath413 will be the circle of radius @xmath418 around @xmath423 . note that for any @xmath424 , the point @xmath100 is outside the @xmath293 contour and for any @xmath425 , the point @xmath99 is inside the @xmath413 contour . since the @xmath293 integral has no singularity at @xmath99 and the @xmath413 integral has no singularity at @xmath100 , the contours can be deformed to @xmath406 and @xmath407 as shown in figure [ fig : primecontours ] by cauchy s theorem and reduces to . now we are ready to derive theorem [ theorem : kernel : n ] from . note that the order of the @xmath293 and @xmath413 integration in the double integral can be interchanged . this is due to fubini s theorem and the fact that the contours @xmath406 and @xmath407 are disjoint . we deform the integration contours in formula from @xmath406 and @xmath407 to the new contours @xmath97 and @xmath98 in the following steps . first we enlarge @xmath407 to @xmath426 if necessary and we move the contour @xmath406 to @xmath97 inside @xmath426 . then , for any fixed @xmath427 , we pick up a residue contribution when deforming @xmath426 to @xmath98 due to the @xmath428 term in @xmath95 . the residue term can be written as @xmath429 the integrand above is analytic away from @xmath99 and @xmath100 , in particular inside @xmath97 , hence it vanishes thanks to cauchy s theorem . in this section , we prove theorem [ thm : hardedgetacnode ] . the proof of the first part follows the lines of the classical method of steep descent analysis . the leading terms in the exponent of the kernel @xmath26 can be expressed by the function @xmath430 we define the following contours with counterclockwise orientation . if @xmath431 and close enough to @xmath167 , then let @xmath432 where @xmath433 and @xmath434 . if @xmath435 and close to @xmath167 , then let @xmath436 where @xmath437 and @xmath438 . the next lemma is about the steep descent properties of these paths . [ lemma : steep ] 1 . there is an @xmath439 close enough to @xmath167 for which @xmath440 defines a steep descent contour for the function @xmath441 with respect to the critical point at @xmath442 . 2 . there is an @xmath443 close enough to @xmath167 for which @xmath444 defines a steep descent contour for the function @xmath445 with respect to the critical point at @xmath442 . to show the steep descent property , we consider the following derivatives . in the neighborhood of @xmath442 , we have @xmath446 if @xmath447 . furthermore , @xmath448 if @xmath449 . on the circular part of the contour , @xmath450 if @xmath431 , is negative for @xmath451 $ ] and positive for @xmath452 $ ] , whereas for @xmath435 , the sign of is opposite . this proves the required property of the paths . we use the method of steep descent analysis . if we substitute and the rescaled space and time variables into the double integral in , one sees that the leading term in the exponent is @xmath453 . we also substitute for @xmath95 . next we specify the initial contours @xmath98 and @xmath97 to be the steep descent contours @xmath454 and @xmath455 . @xmath455 coincides with @xmath456 except for an @xmath457 neighbourhood of @xmath458 and there it crosses the real axis to the right of @xmath99 and @xmath100 . @xmath454 consists of two parts : the first one coincides with @xmath459 except for an @xmath457 neighbourhood of @xmath458 and it remains inside @xmath455 . the other part is a small ( order @xmath457 ) circle around the singularity at @xmath101 which is also in the @xmath457 neighbourhood of @xmath458 due to the scaling . see figure [ fig : xietacontours ] . now we are ready for the steep descent analysis . consider the kernel with the integration contours replaced by @xmath454 and @xmath455 . let us choose a small but fixed @xmath235 and denote @xmath460 and @xmath461 . for @xmath462 small enough , these contours do not contain the circular part of the original steep descent contour coming from the last part in and , but they completely contain the order @xmath457 modifications if @xmath463 is large enough . by neglecting the integral over @xmath464 and @xmath465 , we make an error of order @xmath466 . in the @xmath462 neighborhood of @xmath458 , we can replace @xmath467 by its taylor series . now we can do the change of variables given by @xmath468 the reader should not be confused by the fact that @xmath413 and @xmath293 were initially defined by @xmath414 and @xmath415 in where @xmath414 and @xmath415 played different role than in the rescaling . for the factor giving the main exponential term in , we have @xmath469 using also . the other factors after substituting the scaling on the left - hand side of become @xmath470 and @xmath471 finally , the change of variables gives a factor @xmath472 and @xmath473 goes to @xmath167 . together with proposition [ prop : detdetlimit ] , this shows that the double integral in multiplied by the prefactor @xmath474 is equal to @xmath475 up to an error of order @xmath476 in the exponent coming from the taylor approximation and the additive @xmath466 error . by the identity @xmath477 , the error in the exponent can be removed by an additive @xmath476 error . finally , we extend the integral over @xmath478 to infinity in the @xmath479 directions and the integral over @xmath480 to infinity in the @xmath481 directions on the cost of an @xmath466 error again . this proves the convergence towards the double integral on the right - hand side of . the term @xmath482 appears by simple substitution . if @xmath132 and @xmath133 are confined in a compact subset of @xmath134 , then all the above error estimates can be given uniformly in @xmath132 and @xmath133 yielding the stated uniform convergence . this completes the proof of the first part of the theorem . the second part follows directly from the first one since the uniform convergence of the kernel on bounded intervals implies the convergence of fredholm determinants on compact sets by the dominated convergence theorem . [ prop : detdetlimit ] under the scaling , we have @xmath483 as @xmath484 , where @xmath95 is given by and @xmath130 is defined in . furthermore , @xmath485 . first we will show that @xmath486 is independent of the parameter @xmath105 . to see this , define the diagonal matrices @xmath487 in equation , the matrix product on the right - hand side can be conjugated by the invertible matrices @xmath488 . this yields @xmath489 let us show that the right - hand side of is independent of @xmath105 . the idea is to perform a change of variables @xmath490 and @xmath491 in the defining integrals of @xmath492 , @xmath493 , @xmath494 , @xmath495 , @xmath496 , @xmath497 and @xmath498 , see and . it is not hard to see that after this change of variables , @xmath499 becomes @xmath492 with @xmath413 replaced by @xmath500 and with @xmath501 and @xmath502 defined for @xmath503 , i.e. @xmath504 in . @xmath505 will be @xmath506 with @xmath413 replaced @xmath500 and with @xmath501 and @xmath502 defined for @xmath503 in . similarly , @xmath507 is the same as @xmath494 with @xmath293 replaced by @xmath508 and with @xmath501 and @xmath502 defined for @xmath503 in and @xmath509 is equal to @xmath510 with @xmath293 replaced by @xmath508 in . by the same change of variables , one sees that the block matrix on the right - hand side of is equal to @xmath511 with @xmath501 and @xmath502 defined for @xmath503 in . note that by , replacing @xmath413 and @xmath293 by @xmath500 and @xmath508 means the same scaling as taking @xmath413 and @xmath293 for @xmath503 . hence we have shown that @xmath486 is independent of @xmath105 . therefore we can and do assume that @xmath503 in what follows . denote by @xmath512 ( resp . @xmath62 ) the lower triangular ( resp . upper triangular ) pascal triangle type matrix @xmath513 in equation , the matrix product on the right - hand side can be further conjugated by the invertible matrices @xmath514 . this yields ( recall @xmath503 ) @xmath515 now follows from propositions [ prop : functionlimits ] , [ prop : operatorlimits ] , [ prop : functopbounds ] below and the dominated convergence theorem . note that the right - hand side of can be rewritten by using the block matrix inversion formula . the matrix inverse in the limit is well - defined since the operator @xmath516 is invertible for any @xmath108 , and for @xmath142 large enough the limiting schur complement @xmath517 is also invertible by proposition [ prop : limschur ] . finally , the second assertion follows from the estimates given in proposition [ prop : functopbounds ] . [ prop : functionlimits ] assume that @xmath503 . let @xmath518 be fixed and choose @xmath519 . we have the following limits for the functions in : @xmath520 as @xmath484 pointwise . [ prop : operatorlimits ] assume that @xmath503 . fix the integers @xmath518 and let @xmath519 . then the operators in converge as follows : @xmath521 as @xmath484 pointwise . we have the following decay properties of the functions and operators . [ prop : functopbounds ] assume that @xmath503 . for any @xmath518 and any constant @xmath522 , there are constants @xmath523 such that @xmath524 uniformly for @xmath525 and as @xmath526 for some thresholds @xmath527 and @xmath528 . the strategy for proving propositions [ prop : functionlimits ] and [ prop : operatorlimits ] is the following . to keep the computations simpler , we first prove for @xmath529 , and we point out the changes for general @xmath530 . we first rewrite our functions and operators using the bessel function @xmath531 defined by @xmath532 it turns out that some of the operators and functions can be written even more conveniently using the function @xmath533 which is an approximation of the @xmath84th derivative of the airy function as seen from proposition [ prop : jconv ] . we remark that one can also rewrite @xmath534 by its definition and the binomial theorem as @xmath535 then the limit statement of proposition [ prop : jconv ] and the bound of proposition [ prop : jbound ] imply the claimed convergence results in propositions [ prop : functionlimits ] and [ prop : operatorlimits ] by dominated convergence . the bounds in proposition [ prop : functopbounds ] follow from the bounds given for the dominated convergence argument in the proofs of propositions [ prop : functionlimits ] and [ prop : operatorlimits ] . suppose first that @xmath529 . in the definition of @xmath492 we write @xmath536 and use ( with @xmath503 and @xmath529 ) to obtain @xmath537 on account of . if we substitute the scaling of @xmath413 from ( with @xmath503 ) and @xmath538 and replace the summation by an integral for @xmath539 , then the above expression up to @xmath457 error is @xmath540 the factor @xmath541 converges to @xmath542 and it is bounded by @xmath543 uniformly in @xmath463 . it follows from propositions [ prop : jconv ] and [ prop : jbound ] for @xmath544 that the factor @xmath545 converges to @xmath546 pointwise and that its decay in @xmath547 ( and in @xmath132 ) is faster than any exponential , in particular , faster than @xmath548 . this shows that the dominated convergence theorem applies and it yields for @xmath529 . for general @xmath530 , we have @xmath549 instead of @xmath550 on the right - hand side of . then we use proposition [ prop : jconv ] as @xmath551 after the change of variable @xmath552 in the integral obtained as the limit of @xmath553 , one gets . suppose again @xmath529 . in the definition of @xmath493 , we write @xmath554 as a geometric series as in to get @xmath555 by the definition of the matrix @xmath512 and by that of the function @xmath556 , we have @xmath557 by the same dominated convergence argument as above using propositions [ prop : jconv ] and [ prop : jbound ] for @xmath558 , one can conclude the proof of for @xmath529 . the general case follows as before . the proof of is similar . we write @xmath559 as a geometric series . next we substitute @xmath560 . this allows for expressing @xmath494 with bessel functions as @xmath561 the dominated convergence argument and the extension to general @xmath530 is the same as for @xmath492 . finally , the proof of is straightforward . since the steps of this proof are rather similar to those of proposition [ prop : functionlimits ] , we only give a sketch here , from which the reader can complete the details . we also restrict ourselves to the @xmath529 case . by rewriting @xmath562 as a geometric series , substituting @xmath560 and using ( with @xmath503 ) , we get @xmath563 for @xmath538 and @xmath564 , an application of propositions [ prop : jconv ] and [ prop : jbound ] for @xmath544 and the dominated convergence theorem gives . similarly , @xmath565 as in by applying the matrix @xmath512 , one gets @xmath566 a dominated convergence argument as before yields . it is easy to see that @xmath567 if we apply the matrix @xmath62 from the right , the convergence follows from the equation @xmath568 similarly , @xmath569 after applying the matrix @xmath512 from the left and the matrix @xmath62 from the right , one can rewrite as @xmath570 then follows . this completes the proof of proposition [ prop : operatorlimits ] . the assertions easily follow from the bounds given in the proofs of propositions [ prop : functionlimits ] and [ prop : operatorlimits ] for the dominated convergence argument , which were obtained from proposition [ prop : jbound ] and from obvious estimates . in this section , we first prove proposition [ prop : confluent : a0 ] which is the starting formula for the asymptotic analysis for the hard edge pearcey process . then , we turn to the actual asymptotic analysis , i.e. we prove theorem [ thm : hardedgepearcey ] . we use the following lemma for the proof of proposition [ prop : confluent : a0 ] . [ lemma : kernel : joh ] the kernel @xmath26 for @xmath5 non - intersecting squared bessel paths in can be written as @xmath571 for any @xmath29 and @xmath30 where we use the notation @xmath572 we follow johansson ( * ? ? ? * ( 2.7)(2.10 ) ) . define the column vector @xmath573 applying cramer s rule to , we find @xmath574 where @xmath575 denotes the matrix @xmath33 in with its @xmath84th column replaced by the vector @xmath576 . the following markov type formula holds for the transition probabilities of the squared bessel paths given in for negative time spans : @xmath577 for any @xmath29 and @xmath578 . here we define the branches of the powers in by @xmath579 and @xmath580 when @xmath207 is negative . the markov type formula is the analogue of ( * ? ? ? * ( 2.5)(2.6 ) ) . from , we get @xmath581 with the notation . by inserting into and interchanging the sum and the integral , we obtain . this proves the lemma . consider the ratio of determinants in the right hand side of . from the definition of the transition probability and using the linearity of the determinant , we can write it as @xmath582 where we also used . the factors @xmath583 in the above determinants depend only on the row index @xmath584 , therefore they can be extracted from the determinants cancelling each other completely . but it will be convenient to keep these factors inside the determinants . when taking the confluent limit @xmath585 of , certain derivatives appear . this is discussed by tracy widom @xcite in a similar context . if we apply this idea to , we obtain @xmath586_{a=0}\right)_{i , j } } { \det\left(\frac{\partial^{i-1}}{\partial a^{i-1}}\left [ a^{-\alpha/2 } i_{\alpha}\left(\sqrt{a b_j}\right)\right]_{a=0}\right)_{i , j}}\ ] ] where again @xmath587 run from @xmath167 to @xmath5 . we evaluate the derivatives . from the series expansion of the modified bessel function , we find @xmath588_{a=0}=\frac{1}{\gamma(i+\alpha)}\left(\frac{b}{4}\right)^{i-1+\alpha/2}.\ ] ] using this for both matrices on the right - hand side of and cancelling again the common factors , we obtain @xmath589 where the second line follows from the evaluation of the vandermonde determinants and cancellation of the common factors recalling . , by inserting into and using the residue theorem , we obtain the double integral formula . this proves the proposition . next we prove theorem [ thm : hardedgepearcey ] which immediately follows from the following convergence statement for the kernels . let @xmath590 be fixed numbers . it holds that @xmath591 and the convergence is uniform for @xmath132 and @xmath133 from compact subsets of @xmath134 . we use again the method of steep descent analysis . first we substitute the scaled parameter values of the pearcey scaling to and use the definition of the transition kernel to get @xmath592 we perform the change of variables @xmath593 and @xmath594 in the double integral above . since @xmath595 , the following exponential integral representation holds : @xmath596 the advantage of this formula is that it separates the dependence of the integrand of on the variables @xmath210 and @xmath207 , so the @xmath597 limit of the @xmath210-integral and the @xmath207-integral can be taken separately , as we will proceed . at the end , we will redo the operation . in fact , one could perform the asymptotic analysis without using the identity , but then one would have even longer formulas in the proof . using in , we arrive at @xmath598 we start with the asymptotic analysis for the @xmath210-integral . we are to take the limit of @xmath599 where @xmath600 means an error term which is bounded in absolute value by constant times @xmath601 for @xmath5 large enough . the constant may depend on other parameters : @xmath133 and @xmath221 here . the term @xmath602 has a similar meaning in . we use the method of steep descent analysis to determine the limit of as explained also in @xcite and @xcite . note that by the exponential asymptotics @xmath603 as @xmath604 , see e.g. 9.7.1 in @xcite , the bessel function in corresponds to a term of order @xmath605 in the exponent . the first step of the analysis is to consider the function that is multiplied by the highest power of @xmath5 in the exponent @xmath606 we show that @xmath607 is a steep descent path for the function @xmath608 which means that it reaches its maximum at @xmath609 and that @xmath608 is monotone along @xmath607 . it is easily seen by taking the derivative @xmath610 for all @xmath611 . for a @xmath235 small enough which will be given later , restricting the integral in to @xmath612 gives an error of order @xmath613 as @xmath597 because of the steep descent property of the path . we substitute @xmath467 by its taylor expansion given in , and now we choose @xmath462 small enough such that the error of the taylor expansion is much smaller than the main terms in the exponent . we do a change of variables @xmath614 . as @xmath597 , the error term of the taylor expansion is @xmath602 . in order to compare the integral with and without this error term in the exponent , we use the inequality @xmath477 and we get that the difference of the two integrals is @xmath602 . in the integral without the error term in the exponent , we extend the steepest descent path to @xmath607 again where an error of @xmath613 is made . this procedure of steep descent analysis proves that converges to @xmath615 as @xmath597 . it is also seen from the above argument that the convergence is uniform if @xmath133 is in a compact interval . with a similar method for the @xmath207-integral , one can show that @xmath616 as @xmath597 uniformly as @xmath132 is in a finite interval where @xmath617 is @xmath618 with opposite orientation . the error terms here have similar meaning as in . in this argument , one has to first specify the contour @xmath619 . before taking the @xmath597 limit , let @xmath619 to be the counterclockwise oriented sector contour @xmath620\}\cup\{e^{{\mathbf{i}}\theta}r,\theta\in[-\pi/2+\varepsilon,\pi/2-\varepsilon]\}\cup\{e^{{\mathbf{i}}(\pi/2-\varepsilon)}t , t\in[r,0]\}$ ] where @xmath621 $ ] refers to opposite orientation . here @xmath622 is a small value and @xmath623 is sufficiently large such that the contour surrounds the point @xmath624 . as @xmath625 , the integrand on the left - hand side of along @xmath626\}$ ] becomes exponentially small in @xmath623 for large enough but fixed @xmath5 , hence we can replace @xmath619 by the contour @xmath627 consisting of two rays one coming from @xmath628 to @xmath1 and one from @xmath1 to @xmath629 . the reason why we use the contour @xmath627 for some small @xmath622 for the analysis instead of @xmath630 is that by deforming the contour on the left - hand side of , we do not have enough control on the decay of the integrand along @xmath631\}$ ] . the path @xmath627 is a steep descent contour for the function @xmath632 , since @xmath633 for all @xmath611 if @xmath622 is small enough . one can perform a similar asymptotic analysis as for the @xmath210-integral using the steep descent contour @xmath627 for the @xmath207-integral . one gets the convergence with @xmath617 replaced by @xmath627 on the right - hand side , but these two integrals are the same due to the decay coming from the quadratic term in the exponent . to show that the second term in the right - hand side of without the minus sign converges to @xmath634 we use a dominated convergence argument for the @xmath547 integral of . following the lines of the proof of proposition [ prop : jbound ] , but actually easier as in lemma 4.1 of @xcite , one can give an exponential bound in @xmath547 on the expression in and on the left - hand side of uniformly in @xmath5 . we omit the proof here . this justifies that the second term on the right - hand side of converges to . what is left to show is that can be rewritten as the double integral in . to this end , it is convenient to split the integration contour @xmath618 in into the half - lines @xmath635 and @xmath636 . let us first consider the contribution from @xmath636 . by substituting @xmath207 by @xmath637 and @xmath210 by @xmath638 and taking into account the branches of the powers , we get the contribution @xmath639 where we also used the identity @xmath640 for any @xmath641 for the bessel functions ( see e.g. 9.6.3 in @xcite ) . similarly , the contribution from the half - line @xmath635 in can be written in exactly the same form as , but with @xmath635 replaced by @xmath636 . to get this , we also use the identity @xmath642 for @xmath643 and @xmath644 which is a consequence of the series expansion of the bessel function ( see e.g. 9.1.10 in @xcite ) . combining these two contributions , we conclude that equals @xmath645 making the change of variables @xmath646 and @xmath647 , we rewrite this as @xmath648 where we recall the definition of the contour @xmath54 . hence we obtain the double integral on the right - hand side of . in this section , we prove proposition [ thm : pearcey : alternative ] and corollaries [ cor : kmw ] and [ cor : bk ] . the strategy for proving the proposition is the following . if @xmath7 is an integer , we can give another formulation of the kernel @xmath229 in proposition [ prop : pearcey : alternative2 ] below via the approach used to derive the hard edge tacnode kernel . then we show in proposition [ prop : pearcey : rank1 ] that the temperature derivative of the kernel has a rank one structure . finally , in lemma [ lemma : rank1:eq ] , we see that the functions which appear in the rank one derivative can be written in a simpler form given in . the proof of proposition [ thm : pearcey : alternative ] is easy after this . let @xmath649 let @xmath650 be the matrix of size @xmath75 with @xmath65th entry @xmath651 where the superscript denotes the @xmath652th derivative . let the row vector @xmath653 of size @xmath4 be defined as before by , and let @xmath654 be the column vector of size @xmath4 with @xmath84th entry @xmath655 then we put @xmath656 note that we use the same symbols @xmath654 and @xmath130 in this section for different functions as in the sections about the hard edge tacnode process , but this should not lead to any confusion . the invertibility of the matrix @xmath650 follows from the identity @xmath657 which is easily proved by induction on @xmath4 , see below . now we are ready to state [ prop : pearcey : alternative2 ] if @xmath7 is a non - negative integer , then we can write @xmath229 in as @xmath658 where @xmath234 is a clockwise oriented circle surrounding the singularity at @xmath124 and @xmath235 is chosen such that the contour @xmath236 passes to the right of the singularity at @xmath125 and to the right of the contour @xmath234 . [ prop : pearcey : rank1 ] the derivative of the kernel with respect to @xmath142 is the rank 1 kernel @xmath659 where @xmath660,\\ \label{g2:pea : schur } g_2(t , y ) & = \frac1{2\pi{\mathbf{i}}}\int_{\delta+{\mathbf{i}}{\mathbb{r}}}{\mathrm d}{u}\ , e^{\frac{{u}^2}2-{\sigma}{u}-\frac y{{u}+t}}({u}+t)^{{\alpha}-1 } \left[{u}^{{\alpha}}-{\boldsymbol { \bf u}}{\mathcal d_{\alpha}}^{-1}\left ( b^{(k+{\alpha})}(-{\sigma } ) \right)_{k=0}^{{\alpha}-1}\right].\end{aligned}\ ] ] if @xmath259 then the expressions between square brackets above are understood to be @xmath167 . the proofs of propositions [ prop : pearcey : alternative2 ] and [ prop : pearcey : rank1 ] are very similar to the ones for the analogous statements for the hard edge tacnode kernel . we leave this to the interested reader . contrary to the tacnode case , it turns out that the above formulas can be considerably simplified . [ lemma : rank1:eq ] the functions given in can be written in the simplified form @xmath661 an important ingredient for the proof of lemma [ lemma : rank1:eq ] is the following elementary analysis lemma which we give with a draft of the proof . [ lemma : int : parts : repeated ] for any @xmath662 and any function @xmath148 with sufficient decay at infinity in the direction of the contour @xmath126 , we have @xmath663 this is trivial for @xmath259 . for @xmath155 , it follows by applying integration by parts to the left - hand side of . for higher values of @xmath4 , it follows from a repeated ( @xmath4-fold ) use of integration by parts writing each time @xmath664 and then integrating by parts . this allows to express the left - hand side of as @xmath665 times a sum of several terms . then one notes that these terms cancel out each other completely except for one surviving term which is precisely the right - hand side of . this is obvious for @xmath259 . for general @xmath4 , the first step in the proof is to use lemma [ lemma : int : parts : repeated ] . then it remains to prove two identities , one for @xmath666 and one for @xmath667 . we start with the identity for @xmath666 which reads @xmath668 to prove this identity , we first derive the formula @xmath669 as follows . note that the derivatives of the function @xmath68 satisfy the recursion relation @xmath670 for all @xmath671 which is closely related to the recursion for the hermite polynomials . by taking the @xmath478 derivative of and using , one gets @xmath672 integration by parts yields the equation @xmath673 which substituted into exactly gives . if we apply one derivation on the left - hand side of to the vector of entries @xmath674 , then by , we get @xmath675 if @xmath177 , then @xmath676 is @xmath1 and follows easily . otherwise ( if @xmath677 ) after substituting into the left - hand side of and cancelling @xmath650 with its inverse , the scalar product of the two vectors is @xmath1 , hence the left - hand side of can be written as @xmath678 at this point we apply the following elementary column operations to the matrix @xmath679 . for @xmath680 we update column @xmath87 by subtracting @xmath142 times column @xmath681 and adding @xmath681 times column @xmath682 . by with @xmath683 , the resulting matrix has zeros in its zeroth row , except for the @xmath684 entry , which is @xmath685 . we should apply the same operations to the row vector @xmath686 , but this vector does not change under the operations . then reduces to @xmath687 where @xmath688 denotes an unimportant column vector . taking into account the sparsity pattern of the involved matrices and vectors and using the block inversion formula , this in turn can be reduced to @xmath689^{-1 } \frac{{\partial}^{{\alpha}-1}}{{\partial}{v}^{{\alpha}-1}}\left(e^{-{v}^2/2+{\sigma}{v}}{l h_{l-1}}\right)_{l=1}^{\alpha-1}.\ ] ] finally , we note that the factors @xmath297 in the matrix rows and @xmath87 in the entries of the column vector cancel each other . so we get @xmath690 but this is just what we get from the identity for @xmath691 in , so the proof of ends by induction yielding the equivalence of @xmath666 in and in . now we turn to the identity for @xmath667 . using lemma [ lemma : int : parts : repeated ] , we will prove the identity @xmath692 by induction on @xmath4 . for @xmath259 the identity is trivial since both sides are @xmath167 . for @xmath693 , denote the left - hand side of by @xmath694 and the right - hand side by @xmath695 . note that @xmath694 is basically a hermite polynomial and it satisfies the recursion @xmath696 where the prime denotes the @xmath480-derivative . we will show that @xmath695 satisfies the same recursion . the expression @xmath695 has a schur complement form and therefore it can be written as a ratio of two nested determinants : @xmath697 note that the last column of @xmath698 nicely follows the pattern of the previous columns . we note that the entries in the topmost rows of @xmath698 are basically the hermite polynomials and they satisfy the recursion with @xmath683 . we use the following column operations for @xmath698 : for @xmath680 we update column @xmath87 by subtracting @xmath142 times column @xmath681 and adding @xmath681 times column @xmath682 . the resulting matrix has zeros in its zeroth row , except for the @xmath684 entry , which is @xmath685 , and so we can reduce the size of the determinant . this gives us @xmath699 we take out the factor @xmath700 from the @xmath84th row yielding a total contribution @xmath701 next we split the determinant by linearity with respect to its last row , recognizing the smaller matrix @xmath702 in one of the terms , and its @xmath480-derivative @xmath703 in the other term . this yields @xmath704.\ ] ] similar ( but actually simpler ) manipulations yield @xmath705 using these relations in , we find that @xmath695 satisfies the required recursion relation . this ends the proof of the identity , hence the two definitions and of @xmath667 coincide . by proposition [ prop : pearcey : rank1 ] , the derivative of the kernel @xmath229 with respect to @xmath530 can be written in a rank one form with @xmath666 and @xmath667 given by . note that the derivative of the right - hand side of is also rank one but with @xmath666 and @xmath667 given by . hence lemma [ lemma : rank1:eq ] shows that the two derivatives are the same . moreover , both double integrals converge to zero in the @xmath706 limit . this ends the proof . now we turn to the proofs of the two corollaries . similarly to remark [ rem : cafasso ] for the tacnode kernel , by introducing the new integration variables @xmath707 and @xmath708 in , the kernel can be written alternatively as @xmath709 where @xmath243 is a clockwise circle in the left half - plane touching zero along the imaginary axis , and @xmath244 is a counterclockwise loop surrounding @xmath243 . it is now straightforward to get . [ remark : kmw : noninteger ] similarly to remark [ rem : pearcy : nonint ] , also extends to any real @xmath237 . in this case , we take @xmath243 as above but we replace @xmath244 by a counterclockwise contour coming from @xmath710 from above , encircling @xmath243 , and returning to @xmath710 from below . we then take the powers @xmath711 , @xmath712 with a branch cut along the positive half - line , i.e. , with @xmath713 , see also ( * ? ? ? * eq . ( 1.19 ) ) . for @xmath246 , we have @xmath714 if @xmath715 or @xmath716 . substituting this , we get the following expression for the kernel @xmath717 to conclude the proof , one has to do the change of variables @xmath718 and @xmath719 and substitute the new variables from along with the derivative @xmath720 , the rest is straightforward . in this section , we prove proposition [ prop : limschur ] . it relies on lemmas [ lemma : detairewrite ] , [ lemma : fklasympt ] and [ lemma : detan ] . in order to state them , we introduce the following notation . then we give the proof of the proposition , finally , we prove the lemmas . inspired by the asymptotics of the airy function @xmath721 as @xmath165 , see e.g. 10.4.59 in @xcite , let us denote @xmath722 for @xmath723 . [ lemma : detairewrite ] for any positive integer @xmath5 , one has the equality @xmath724 where @xmath725 is the @xmath87th derivative of @xmath726 . by the definition @xmath727 of the airy function , all higher derivatives of @xmath728 can be expressed in terms @xmath729 and @xmath730 . by and the asymptotics of @xmath730 , see 10.4.61 in @xcite , it follows that @xmath731 as @xmath165 with @xmath732 where the empty product is defined to be @xmath167 . note that already yields the following [ lemma : fklasympt ] we have the asymptotics @xmath733 as @xmath165 . the matrix in the lemma has the form @xmath734 [ lemma : detan ] the determinant of the @xmath34 matrix defined by is @xmath735 1 . the asymptotics readily follows if one puts together , and . 2 . the assertion is a consequence of the first part and the discussion in the paragraph before the statement of the proposition . by definition , one immediately gets with @xmath736 replaced by @xmath737 in the determinant on the right - hand side . hence one only needs to show that @xmath738 it follows from that the recursion relation @xmath739 holds for any @xmath740 integer . in , @xmath741 is expressed in terms of @xmath726 and its derivative where the coefficient of the latter is @xmath167 . by applying and its derivative on the right - hand side of again , one can express @xmath742 in terms of @xmath726 and its first and second derivative where the coefficient of the second derivative is @xmath167 . in general , one gets by induction that @xmath743 for all @xmath346 non - negative integers where @xmath744 are coefficients that depend on @xmath132 but not on @xmath84 . the equality of the determinants now follows by simple column transformations . we first represent the entries on the left - hand side of as given in . then we perform the following step for @xmath745 : from the @xmath87th column of the matrix , we subtract @xmath746 times the @xmath1 column , @xmath747 times the first column , up to @xmath748 times the @xmath681st column . after these transformations , we recover the right - hand side of , which completes the proof . we apply elementary column operation on the matrix @xmath749 in order to get @xmath1 everywhere in the first row except for the first position as follows . starting from the last column and proceeding from right to left until the second column , we add an appropriate multiple of the previous column to each of the columns such that we get @xmath1 in the top position of the column . with this procedure , we get that @xmath750 where we expanded the determinant along the first row in the last step . by dividing the @xmath84th row on the right - hand side of by @xmath751 , we get that the determinant of the matrix @xmath749 is @xmath752 times a similar @xmath753 determinant as that of @xmath749 . the statement of the lemma now follows by induction . [ prop : jconv ] fix a non - negative integer @xmath84 . then for any @xmath754 , @xmath755 pointwise as @xmath756 . in the integral representation of @xmath556 in , the coefficient of the leading term in the exponent as @xmath756 is the function @xmath757 for which we introduce the following steep descent path . it follows from the more general derivative calculation in that the circle @xmath758 is a steep descent path for @xmath759 for any @xmath622 . let us choose a small @xmath760 such that @xmath758 replaced in a small neighborhood of @xmath167 by a segment of the path @xmath761 such that they form a closed loop around the origin . for the contour given above , we perform the usual steep descent analysis , so we first neglect the integral on the right - hand side of except for a small neighborhood of @xmath167 . after the change of variable @xmath762 , we get that @xmath763 to show that the right - hand side of and that of are the same , we apply a dominated convergence argument . with the notation @xmath764 we can write @xmath765 where we used the dominated convergence theorem in the second step above . the integrand can be dominated uniformly in @xmath766 because of the fast decay of @xmath767 along the @xmath768 contour . [ prop : jbound ] fix a non - negative integer @xmath84 . for any @xmath769 , there is a finite constant @xmath54 and thresholds @xmath770 , @xmath771 such that @xmath772 holds uniformly for @xmath773 if @xmath774 . we adapt the method of proof of proposition 5.3 in @xcite or that of lemma 4.1 in @xcite to our setting . in order to investigate the large values of @xmath775 , we rescale it as @xmath776 and we define the function @xmath777 which gives the leading contribution in the exponent of the integrand on the right - hand side of if @xmath775 is of order @xmath778 . for small values of @xmath779 , this function has two critical points at @xmath780 at first order , and we will pass through the larger one . hence define @xmath781 for some small @xmath622 to be chosen later . on the right - hand side of , we can change the integration contour by the cauchy theorem to a circle of radius @xmath7 . using the definition , this yields @xmath782 the path @xmath783 is steep descent for the function @xmath784 , since @xmath785 which is negative for @xmath786 and @xmath787 . we show that the integral in can be bounded by the value of the integrand at @xmath7 . to this end , define @xmath788 let @xmath789 for some small @xmath235 . by the steep descent property of @xmath783 , the contribution of the integral over @xmath790 in is bounded by @xmath791 where @xmath792 does not depend on @xmath221 . to bound the integral over @xmath793 , we first observe by series expansion that @xmath794 we also use that for any @xmath795 @xmath796 holds for some @xmath797 and @xmath512 constants by if @xmath775 is larger than some @xmath771 . if @xmath798 is such that @xmath799 , then the stronger bound @xmath800 applies . putting the estimates , and together , we get that the integral on the right - hand side of taken only over @xmath793 can be bounded by @xmath801 } { \mathrm d}\theta e^{-\frac{\alpha-\alpha^{-1}}2 \theta^2 t(1+{\mathcal o}(\theta))}k + \int_{\substack{[-\delta,\delta]\setminus\\ [ -t^{-\frac13},t^{-\frac13 } ] } } { \mathrm d}\theta e^{-\frac{\alpha-\alpha^{-1}}2 \theta^2 t(1+{\mathcal o}(\theta))}kt^{k/3}\bigg]\end{gathered}\ ] ] after the change of variable @xmath798 . for @xmath221 large enough , the error terms in the exponents on the right - hand side of and factor @xmath802 in the second integral can be removed by replacing @xmath803 by @xmath804 . thus we get that @xmath805 by bounding the gaussian integral . the estimate above is the largest if @xmath7 is close to @xmath167 . note that , by and , @xmath806 which is large if @xmath775 is large enough , therefore is at most constant times @xmath807 . the authors thank patrik ferrari for many illuminating discussions at different stages of the project and mattia cafasso for the discussion which led to remark [ rem : cafasso ] . b. v. thanks the invitation of lun zhang and the hospitality of the ku leuven where the present research was initiated . he is grateful for the generous support of the humboldt research fellowship for postdoctoral researchers during his stay at the university of bonn and for the postdoctoral fellowship of the hungarian academy of sciences . his work was partially supported by otka ( hungarian national research fund ) grant k100473 . s. d. is a postdoctoral fellow of the fund for scientific research flanders ( belgium ) . Abstract:
[ "a system of non - intersecting squared bessel processes is considered which all start from one point and they all return to another point . under the scaling of the starting and ending points when the macroscopic boundary of the paths touches the hard edge , a limiting critical process is described in the neighbourhood of the touching point which we call the hard edge tacnode process . we derive its correlation kernel in an explicit new form which involves airy type functions and operators that act on the direct sum of @xmath0 and a finite dimensional space . as the starting points of the squared bessel paths are set to @xmath1 , a cusp in the boundary appears . the limiting process is described near the cusp and it is called the hard edge pearcey process . we compute its multi - time correlation kernel which extends the existing formulas for the single - time kernel . our pre - asymptotic correlation kernel involves the ratio of two toeplitz determinants which are rewritten using a borodin okounkov type formula ." ]
15,170
15,170
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: a very common statistical procedure is obtaining a confidence interval for a physics parameter of interest , when there are uncertainties in quantities such as the acceptance of the detector and/or the analysis procedure , the beam intensity , and the estimated background . these are known in statistics as nuisance parameters , or in particle physics as sources of systematic uncertainty . we assume that estimates of these quantities are available from subsidiary measurements . ; that is not enough information for a bayesian approach . alternatively the data relevant for the physics and nuisance parameters could be bound up in the main measurement , and not require a subsidiary one . ] a variant of this procedure which is particularly relevant for particle physics is the extraction of an upper limit on the rate of some hypothesized process or on a physical parameter , again with systematic uncertainties . to specify the problem in more detail , we assume that we are performing a counting experiment in which we observe @xmath0 counts , and that the acceptance has been estimated as @xmath1 and the background as @xmath2 . for a signal rate @xmath3 , @xmath0 is poisson distributed with mean @xmath4 . here @xmath5 contains factors like the intensity of the accelerator beam(s ) , the running time , and various efficiencies . it is constrained to be non - negative , but can be larger than unity . we aim to study and compare different approaches for determining confidence intervals for this problem . in general we are interested in pathologies in these areas : * * coverage . * this is a measure of how often the limits that we deduce would in fact include the true value of the parameter . this requires consideration of an ensemble of experiments like the one we actually performed , and hence is an essentially frequentist concept . nevertheless , it can be applied to a bayesian technique . + coverage is a property of the technique , and not of the particular limit deduced from a given measurement . it can , however , be a function of the true value of the parameter , which is in general unknown in a real measurement . + undercoverage ( i.e. the probability of containing the true value is less than the stated confidence level ) is regarded by frequentists as a serious defect . usually coverage is required for all possible values of the physical parameter . occur at values which are not fixed in @xmath3 , but which depend on the details of our experiment ( such as the values of @xmath5 and @xmath6 ) . these details vary from experiment to experiment . thus we could achieve ` no undercoverage for the ensemble of experiments measuring the parameter @xmath3 ' , even if the individual coverage plots did fall below the nominal coverage occasionally . thus in some sense ` average coverage ' would be sufficient ( see for example reference @xcite ) , although it is hard to quantify the exact meaning of ` average ' . it should be stated that this is not the accepted position of most high energy physics frequentists . ] in contrast , overcoverage is permissible , but the larger intervals result in less stringent tests of models that predict the value of the parameter . for measurements involving quantised data ( e.g. poisson counting ) , most methods have coverage which varies with the true value of the parameter of interest , and hence if undercoverage is to be avoided , overcoverage is inevitable . + frequentist methods by construction will not undercover for any values of the parameters . this is not guaranteed for other approaches . for example , even though the bayesian intervals shown here do not undercover , in other problems bayesian 95% credible intervals could even have zero coverage for some values of the parameter of interest.@xcite it should also be remarked that , although coverage is a very important property for frequentists , on its own exact coverage does not guarantee that intervals have desirable properties ( for many examples , see refs . @xcite and @xcite ) . * * interval length . * this is sometimes used as a criterion of accuracy of intervals , in the sense that shorter intervals have less probability of covering false values of the parameter of interest . however , one should keep in mind that short intervals are only desirable if they contain the true value of the parameter . thus empty intervals , which do occur in some frequentist constructions , are generally undesirable , even when their construction formally enjoys frequentist coverage . + intervals that fill the entire physically allowed range of the parameter of interest may also occur in some situations . examples of this behavior are given in @xcite and @xcite . an experimenter who requests a 68% confidence interval , but receives what appears to be a 100% confidence interval instead , may not be satisfied with the explanation that he is performing a useful service in helping to keep the coverage probability averaged over his measurement and his competitor s measurements from dropping below 68% . * * bayesian credibility . * in some situations it may be relevant to calculate the bayesian credibility of an interval , even when the latter was constructed by frequentist methods . this would of course require one to choose a prior for all the unknown parameters . the question is one of plausibility : given the type of measurement we are making , the resolution of the apparatus , etc . , how likely is it that the true value of the parameter we are interested in lies in the calculated interval ? does this differ dramatically from the nominal coverage probability of the interval ? in fact for different values of the observable(s ) , frequentist ranges are very likely to have different credibilities . some examples of this behavior are noted in ref . @xcite . + when calculating the bayesian credibility of frequentist intervals , `` uninformative '' priors appear advisable . note that severe interval length pathologies will automatically produce a large inconsistency between the nominal coverage and the bayesian credibility of an interval . except in a handful of very special cases , it is not possible to construct an interval scheme that has simultaneously constant bayesian credibility and constant frequentist coverage , even if one has total freedom in choosing the prior(s ) . although it is not at all clear exactly how large a level of disagreement is pathological , nevertheless it may be instructive to know how severely an interval scheme deviates from constant bayesian credibility ( and how sensitive this is to the choice of prior ) . * * bias . * in the context of interval selection , this means having a larger coverage @xmath7 for an incorrect value @xmath8 of the parameter than for the true value @xmath9 . this requires plots of coverage versus @xmath8 for different values of @xmath9 . for upper limits , @xmath10 if @xmath11 is less than @xmath12 , so methods are necessarily biassed for low @xmath8 . bias thus is not very interesting for upper limits . it will be discussed in later notes dealing with two - sided intervals . * * transformation under reparametrisation . * intervals that are not transformation - respecting can be problematic . for example , it is possible for the predicted value of the lifetime of a particle to be contained within the 90% interval determined from the data , but for the corresponding predicted value of the decay rate ( equal to the reciprocal of the predicted lifetime ) to be outside the 90% interval when the data is analysed by the same procedure , but in terms of decay rate . this would result in unwanted ambiguities about the compatibility of the data with the prediction . * * unphysical ranges . * the question here is whether the interval construction procedure can be made to respect the physical boundaries of the problem . for example , branching fractions should be in the range zero to one , masses should not be negative , etc . statements about the _ true _ value of a parameter should respect any physical bounds . in contrast , some methods give _ estimates _ of parameters which can themselves be unphysical , or which include unphysical values when the errors are taken into account . we do not recommend truncating ranges of _ estimates _ of parameters to obey such bounds . thus the fact that a branching fraction is estimated as @xmath13 conveys more information about the experimental result than does the statement that it lies in the range 0.9 to 1 . * * behavior with respect to nuisance parameter . * we would normally expect that the limits on a physical parameter would tighten as the uncertainty on a nuisance parameter decreases ; and that as this uncertainty tends to zero , the limits should agree with those obtained under the assumption that the `` nuisance parameter '' was exactly known . ( otherwise we could sometimes obtain a tighter limit simply by pretending that we knew less about the nuisance parameter than in fact is the case . ) these desiderata are not always satisfied by non - bayesian methods ( see @xcite and @xcite ) . although we are ultimately interested in comparing different approaches to this problem , in this note we investigate a bayesian technique for determining upper limits . our purpose is to spell out in some detail how this approach is used , and to discuss some of the properties of the resulting limits in this specific example . we believe that , for variants of this problem ( e.g. different choice of prior for @xmath3 ; alternative assumptions about the information on the nuisance parameters ; etc . ) , the reader could readily adapt the techniques described here ( and the associated software ) to their particular situation . we will report on two - sided intervals and also compare with other methods ( e.g. cousins highland , pure frequentist , profiled frequentist ) in later notes . before dealing with the problem of extracting and studying the limits on @xmath3 as deduced from observing @xmath0 events from a poisson distribution with mean @xmath4 in the presence of an uncertainty on @xmath5 , we recall the way the bayesian approach works for the simpler problem of a counting experiment with no background and with @xmath5 exactly known . then @xmath0 is poisson distributed with mean @xmath14 , and bayes theorem s denote prior p.d.f.s , lower case @xmath15 s denote other p.d.f.s , upper case @xmath16 s denote prior probabilities , and upper case @xmath17 s denote other probabilities . equation ( [ eqn : bayesth ] ) is true for probabilities , p.d.f.s , or mixtures depending on whether @xmath18 and/or @xmath19 are discrete or continuous variables . ] @xmath20 gives @xmath21 where @xmath22 is the prior probability density for @xmath3 ; @xmath23 is the posterior probability density function ( p.d.f . ) for @xmath3 , given the observed @xmath0 ; and @xmath24 is the probability of observing @xmath0 , given @xmath3 . we assume a constant prior for @xmath3 , . ) ] and that @xmath24 is given by the poisson @xmath25 then of the discrete distribution ( [ eqn : poisson ] ) and the integral over @xmath3 of the continuous distribution ( [ eqn : poisson2 ] ) are both equal to unity . this means that the probability @xmath24 and the probability density @xmath23 are correctly normalised . ] @xmath26 the limit is now obtained by integrating this posterior p.d.f . for @xmath3 until we achieve the required fraction @xmath27 of the total integral from zero to infinity . if @xmath27 is @xmath28 , the upper limit @xmath29 is given by @xmath30 @xmath27 is termed the credible or bayesian confidence level for the limit . for different observed @xmath0 , the upper limits are shown in the last two columns of table [ ltablex ] , for @xmath31 and for @xmath32 respectively . the gaussian approximation for the case @xmath31 , @xmath33 , would yield @xmath34 , which is roughly comparable to the corresponding @xmath35 of the table . for @xmath31 , it coincidentally turns out that , for this particular example , the bayesian upper limits are identical with those obtained in a frequentist calculation with the neyman construction and a simple ordering rule ( see later note on the frequentist approach to this problem ) . in general this is not so . other priors sometimes used for @xmath3 are @xmath36 @xcite or @xmath37 @xcite . having a prior peaked at smaller values of @xmath3 in general results in tighter limits for a given observed @xmath0 . if the whole procedure is now repeated with a background @xmath6 and a flat prior , the upper limits not surprisingly decrease for increasing @xmath6 at fixed @xmath0 ( except for the case @xmath38 where the limits can trivially be seen to be independent of @xmath6 ) . this is not inconsistent with the fact that the mean limit for a series of measurements increases with @xmath6 , i.e. experiments with larger expected backgrounds have poorer sensitivity . .upper 90% limits for @xmath0 observed events with @xmath6 background and @xmath39 ( @xmath40 and @xmath41 , as defined in section [ submeas ] ) . also shown are limits for @xmath42 and @xmath43 with fixed @xmath44 . [ ltablex ] [ cols= " > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > , > " , ] next we can investigate the frequentist coverage @xmath45 when the poisson variable is generated with @xmath46 . this differs from @xmath7 where the coverage is checked at @xmath47 when the generation value is @xmath9 . ] of this bayesian approach . that is , we can ask what the probability is , for a given value of @xmath9 , of our upper limit being larger than @xmath9 , and hence being consistent with it . this is equivalent to adding up the poisson probabilities of eqn . ( [ eqn : poisson ] ) for those values of @xmath0 for which @xmath48 i.e. @xmath49 as @xmath9 increases through any of the values of @xmath29 of the last two columns of table [ ltablex ] , the coverage drops sharply . for example , for the case of zero background and efficiency known to be unity , the 90% bayesian upper limits will include @xmath50 for @xmath51 or larger . but @xmath52 is no longer below the upper limit for @xmath51 . thus one term drops out of the summation of eqn . ( [ csum ] ) for the calculation of the coverage at @xmath52 , while the remaining terms change but little for the small change in @xmath9 ; this produces the abrupt fall in coverage . the coverage is plotted in fig . [ fig : bayes ] , where the drop at @xmath53 can be seen . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the calculation of @xmath45 can be done as follows : the identity @xmath54= -e^{-x}{x^n\over n ! } \qquad\mathrm{for}\qquad f(x)=e^{-x}\sum_{k=0}^n{x^k\over k!}\ ] ] allows us to write ( integrating @xmath55 ) @xmath56 from this , it follows that `` relevant @xmath0 '' is equivalent to any one of these inequalities : @xmath57 and our expression for the coverage becomes @xmath58 where @xmath59 means `` sum until the next term would cause the sum to exceed @xmath60 '' . this result proves that @xmath61 for all values of @xmath9 in this simple example . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ it is seen that the coverage starts at @xmath62 for small @xmath9 . this is because even for @xmath38 the bayesian upper limit will include @xmath9 , and this is even more so for larger @xmath0 . bayesian methods can be shown to achieve average coverage . by this we mean that when the coverage is averaged over the parameter @xmath3 , weighted by the prior in @xmath3 , the result will agree with the nominal value @xmath27 , i.e. @xmath63 a proof of this theorem is given in the second appendix , section [ ac ] of this note . for a constant prior , the region at large @xmath3 tends to dominate the average , while in general we will be interested in the coverage at small @xmath3 . thus the `` average coverage '' result is of academic rather than practical interest , especially for the case of a flat prior . indeed it is possible to have a situation where the average coverage is , say , @xmath28 , while the coverage as a function of @xmath3 is always larger than or equal to @xmath28 . our actual problem differs from the simple case of section [ bayes ] in that + ( a ) we have a background @xmath6 , assumed for the time being to be accurately known ; and ( b ) we have an acceptance @xmath5 estimated in a subsidiary experiment as @xmath1 . what we are going to do is to use a multidimensional version of bayes theorem to express @xmath64 in terms of @xmath65 and the priors for @xmath3 and @xmath5 . the relationship is and + + @xmath66 . + + so with @xmath67 , @xmath68 and @xmath69 identified with @xmath3 , @xmath5 and @xmath0 respectively , and with the prior for @xmath3 and @xmath5 factorising into two separate priors for @xmath3 and for @xmath5 , we obtain @xmath70 . ] @xmath71 to obtain the posterior p.d.f . for @xmath3 , we now integrate this over @xmath5 : @xmath72 and finally we use this to set a limit on @xmath3 as in eqn . ( [ eqn:0.9 ] ) . the coverage for this procedure needs to be calculated as a function of @xmath9 and @xmath73 . the average coverage theorem of the previous section must be generalized to @xmath74 to implement the above procedure we need priors for @xmath3 and @xmath5 . as in the simple example of section [ bayes ] , for simplicity we assume that the prior for @xmath3 is constant . it will be interesting to look at the way the properties of this method change as other priors for @xmath3 are used . we assume that the prior for @xmath5 is extracted from some subsidiary measurement @xmath75 . we do * not * assume that this implies that our belief about @xmath73 is represented by a * gaussian * distribution centred on @xmath76 , as this would give trouble with the lower end of the gaussian extending to negative @xmath5 . instead , we specify some particular form of the subsidiary experiment that provides information about @xmath5 , and then assume that a bayesian analysis of this yields a posterior p.d.f . for @xmath5 . slightly confusingly , this posterior from the subsidiary experiment is used as the prior for the application of bayes theorem to extract the limit on @xmath3 ( see eqns.([eqn : extended ] ) and ( [ eqn : posterior ] ) ) . somewhat arbitrarily , we assume that , for a true acceptance @xmath73 , the probability for the measured value @xmath76 in the subsidiary experiment is given by a poisson distribution @xmath77 where @xmath78 , @xmath79 and @xmath80 is a scaling constant and @xmath81 as the mean and variance of the posterior p.d.f . of eqn . ( [ eqn : posterior_e ] ) . ] . we interpret this as the probability for @xmath76 . this is discrete because the observable @xmath82 is discrete , but the allowed values become closely spaced for large @xmath80 . for small @xmath83 ( i.e. for large @xmath82 ) , these probabilities approximate to a narrow gaussian ( see fig . [ fig : comparison ] ) . given our choice of probability in eqn . ( [ eqn : pdf ] ) , the likelihood for the parameter @xmath5 , given measured @xmath76 , is @xmath84 this is the same function of @xmath5 and @xmath76 as eqn . ( [ eqn : pdf ] ) , but now @xmath82 is regarded as fixed , and @xmath5 is the variable . the likelihood is a continuous function of @xmath5 . it is compared with a gaussian in fig . [ fig : comparison2 ] . finally in the bayes approach , with the choice of a constant prior for @xmath5 , the posterior probability density for @xmath5 after our subsidiary measurement is @xmath85 which is obtained by multiplying the right - hand side of eqn . ( [ eqn : likelihood ] ) by unity . this * posterior * probability density for @xmath5 will be used as our * prior * for @xmath5 in the next step of deducing the limit for @xmath3 . the details of the necessary analytical calculations are presented in the appendix of this note . in this section we investigate the behavior of the bayesian limits in this example , especially the shape of the frequentist coverage probability as a function of @xmath9 . the posterior p.d.f . for @xmath3 has the form @xmath861\,ds\ ] ] where the likelihood , the prior for @xmath5 , the ( constant ) prior for @xmath3 , and the marginalization integral over @xmath5 are all prominently displayed . the posterior probability density for @xmath3 gives the complete summary of the outcome of the measurement in the bayesian approach . it is therefore important to understand its shape before proceeding to use it to compute a limit ( or extract a central value and error - bars ) . figure [ pdfs ] illustrates the shape of the posterior for @xmath3 ( i.e. marginalized over @xmath5 ) in the case of a nominal 10% uncertainty on @xmath5 , and an expectation of 3 background events . plots are shown for 1 , 3 , 5 , and 10 observed events . the posterior evolves gracefully from being strongly peaked at @xmath87 to a roughly gaussian shape that excludes the neighborhood near @xmath87 with high probability . technically , the posterior would be described as a mixture of @xmath88 beta distributions of the 2nd kind '' ( i.e. `` beta prime '' ) , `` inverted beta '' , `` pearson type vi '' , `` variance - ratio '' , `` gamma - gamma '' , `` f '' , `` snedecor '' , `` fisher - snedecor'' . ] , giving it a tail at high @xmath3 that is heavier than that of a gaussian . in this note , our main goal is to obtain a bayesian upper limit @xmath29 from our observation of @xmath0 events . it is by integrating the posterior p.d.f . out to @xmath89 that an upper limit is calculated : a @xmath90 upper limit is defined so that the integral of the posterior from @xmath87 to @xmath89 is 0.9 . the probability ( in the bayesian sense ) of @xmath91 is then exactly @xmath27 . table [ ltablex ] shows the upper limits ( @xmath92 ) for @xmath9320 observed events with @xmath428 and @xmath39 . ( integer values of @xmath6 are chosen for illustration purposes only ; @xmath6 can , of course , take any real value @xmath94 . ) one notices that when @xmath93 , the limit is independent of the expected background @xmath6 . this is required in the bayesian approach : we know that exactly zero background events were produced ( when no events at all were produced ) , and this knowledge of what _ did _ happen makes what might have happened superfluous . an interesting corollary is , in the case of no events observed , uncertainties in estimating the background rate are of no consequence in the bayesian approach , and must not contribute any systematic uncertainty to the limit . this reasoning does not hold in the frequentist framework , where what might have happened definitely does influence the limit . for comparison , limits for fixed @xmath44 with @xmath42 or @xmath43 are also shown in table [ ltablex ] . it is interesting that these two columns start out equal at @xmath93 and differ by almost exactly 3 for @xmath95 . in contrast , the difference between the @xmath42 and @xmath43 columns for @xmath39 is already greater than 3 at @xmath96 , and continues to grow as @xmath0 increases ; it is not clear whether the difference approaches a finite value as @xmath97 . in any case , the limits for @xmath44 exactly are all smaller than the corresponding limits for @xmath39 , as expected . the main quantity of interest in this subsection is the frequentist coverage probability @xmath19 as a function of @xmath9 ( for fixed @xmath73 and @xmath6 ) . because both the main and the subsidiary measurements involve observing a discrete number of events , the function @xmath45 will have many discontinuities . on the other hand , @xmath98 will be continuous ( for fixed @xmath9 ) . the explanation of this effect is as follows : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the measured data are @xmath0 events in the main measurement and @xmath82 events in the subsidiary measurement . for each observed outcome @xmath99 there is a limit @xmath100 . this limit includes the effect of marginalization over @xmath5 . all @xmath99 with @xmath101 and @xmath102 are possible , and the probability @xmath17 of observing @xmath99 can be calculated as the product of two poissons . ( it will depend on @xmath9 , @xmath73 , ) if we look at all the possible limits we can obtain , @xmath103 and sort them in increasing @xmath29 , the @xmath29 are countably infinite in number and dense in the same way that rational numbers are dense in the reals . to compute the coverage as a function of @xmath9 , we simply add up all the probabilities of obtaining @xmath99 with @xmath104 : @xmath105 this sum is over a countably infinite number of terms . if we increase @xmath106 slightly to @xmath107 and recalculate the coverage , we have to drop all the terms @xmath108 from the previous sum ( the @xmath109 for each term also changes continuously with @xmath106 , but this is no problem ) . if there are @xmath110 such terms , there are @xmath111 discontinuities in the coverage in the interval @xmath112 $ ] , since @xmath109 for each of these is finite , and we lose them one by one as we sweep across the interval @xmath112 $ ] . but it seems that , in general , we can always find a solution to @xmath113 for finite @xmath114 by going out to larger and larger @xmath0 and @xmath82 . so , although the discontinuity may be tiny , we can always find a finite discontinuity in any finite interval of @xmath106 . on the other hand , if we keep @xmath106 fixed and vary @xmath115 , we always sum over the same set of @xmath99 , since the definition of @xmath116 does not involve @xmath73 , and @xmath109 is continuous in @xmath73 . so the coverage is continuous as a function of @xmath73 for @xmath9fixed . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ plotting a curve that is discontinuous at every point is somewhat problematical . the solution adopted here is to plot the coverage as straight line segments between the discontinuities , ignoring any discontinuities with @xmath117 . figure [ l100 ] shows @xmath45 for the case @xmath90 , @xmath118 , nominal 10% uncertainty of the subsidiary measurement of @xmath5 , and @xmath43 . we observe that @xmath119 in this range , and it is not clear numerically whether @xmath120 as @xmath121 . the same conclusions hold for fig . [ l25 ] , which illustrates the same situation with a 20% nominal uncertainty for the @xmath5-measurement . figure [ ecov ] shows @xmath98 for @xmath90 , @xmath122 , @xmath40 , and @xmath43continuous as advertised . the shape of the curve is quite similar to that of figs . [ l100 ] and [ l25 ] , so it seems that the coverage probability ( with @xmath6 fixed ) is approximately a function of just the product of @xmath73 and @xmath9 . this approximate rule is likely to fail in the limit as @xmath123 and @xmath121 , for example , but it seems to hold when @xmath73 and @xmath9 are at least of the same order of magnitude . when @xmath124 is small , of order 1 or less , the coverage is @xmath125100% , as in the simple case of fig . [ fig : bayes ] . otherwise , the behavior of coverage in figs . [ l100][ecov ] is superior to that of fig . [ fig : bayes ] , which has a much larger amplitude of oscillation . another frequentist quantity that characterizes the performance of a limit scheme is the sensitivity , defined as the mean of @xmath29 . figure [ sens ] shows the sensitivity as a function of @xmath9 for the case of fig . [ l100 ] ; @xmath126 is observed to be nearly linearly dependent on @xmath9 . there is one complication here : when the subsidiary measurement observes @xmath127 events , and the prior for @xmath3 is flat , @xmath128 . since the poisson probability of obtaining @xmath127 is always finite , @xmath129 is consequently infinite . so we must exclude the @xmath127 case from the definition of @xmath129 . ( in fig . [ sens ] the probability of obtaining @xmath127 is @xmath130 . ) a weakness of the bayesian approach is that there is no universally accepted method to obtain a unique `` non - informative '' or `` objective '' prior p.d.f . reference @xcite , for example , states : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ put bluntly : data can not ever speak entirely for themselves ; every prior specification has _ some _ informative posterior or predictive implications ; and `` vague '' is itself much too vague an idea to be useful . there is no `` objective '' prior that represents ignorance . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ nevertheless , ref . @xcite does derive a @xmath131 `` reference prior '' for the simple poisson case , which is claimed to have `` a minimal effect , relative to the data , on the final inference '' . this is to be considered a `` _ default _ option when there are insufficient resources for detailed elicitation of actual prior knowledge '' . reference @xcite attempts to discover the optimal form for prior ignorance by considering the behavior of the prior under reparameterizations . for the case in question , the form @xmath37 clearly has the best properties in this respect . we are using an flat ( @xmath132 ) prior for this study , which seems to be the most popular choice , but the appendix works out the form of the posterior using an @xmath133 prior , so we can briefly here summarize the results for the @xmath37 and @xmath131 cases : the @xmath37 prior leads to an unnormalizable posterior for all observed @xmath0 when @xmath134 . the posterior becomes a @xmath135-function at @xmath87 , @xmath136 for any @xmath27 , and the coverage is consequently zero for all @xmath137 . this clearly is a disaster . the @xmath131 prior results in a posterior p.d.f . qualitatively similar in shape to those of fig [ pdfs ] , except that the p.d.f.is always infinite at @xmath87 . for @xmath138 , this produces an extremely thin `` spike '' at @xmath87 , which has a negligible contribution to the integral of the posterior p.d.f . a more significant difference ( for frequentists ) between the @xmath131 and the @xmath132 case is that the coverage probability is significantly reduced : for the case of fig . [ l100 ] the @xmath131 prior pushes the minimum coverage down to @xmath1250.87 . so the @xmath131 prior leads to violation of the frequentist coverage requirement ; it undercovers for some values of @xmath9 . one might also seek to further improve the coverage properties by adopting an intermediate prior . for example , an @xmath139 prior would reduce the level of overcoverage obtained with the @xmath132 prior . how acceptable this approach would be within the bayesian statistical community is an interesting question . it should be noted that all the prior p.d.f.s considered in this note are `` improper priors''they can not be correctly normalized : in the case of the @xmath132 and @xmath131 priors , the integral from 0 to any value @xmath140 is finite , while the integral from @xmath140 to infinity is infinite . the corresponding integrals of the @xmath37 prior are infinite on both sides for all @xmath141 . improper priors are dangerous but often useful ; `` improper posteriors '' are generally pathological . extra care must be taken when employing improper priors to verify the normalizability of the resulting posterior when using a numerical method to obtain the posterior , it is very easy to miss the fact that its integral is infinite . we summarize here the restrictions forced on the priors for @xmath3 and @xmath5see the appendix for the analytical causes . the discussion below assumes @xmath134 . the prior for @xmath3 being of the form @xmath133 , we must require @xmath142 , as discussed above . as specified in this note , the prior for @xmath5 , being taken from the posterior from the subsidiary measurement with a flat prior , has been given no freedom . should the subsidiary measurement observe @xmath127 events , the posterior for @xmath3 is not normalizable when @xmath143 : @xmath128 when @xmath127 and @xmath143 . this behavior is due to a well known effect : the @xmath5 prior becomes @xmath144 when @xmath127 , which remains finite as @xmath145 . all such cases is the standard example . ] yield @xmath128 when @xmath143 ; any positive @xmath146 cuts off the posterior at large @xmath3 sufficiently rapidly to render it normalizable . from this point of view , a @xmath131 prior may seem preferable , but on the other hand , having @xmath128 when @xmath127 seems intuitively reasonable . ( in general , we have @xmath128 for @xmath147 , but @xmath148 are not popular choices . ) there is another approach possible to the gamma prior for @xmath5 : we may simply specify by fiat the form of the prior as @xmath149 where @xmath150 is no longer required to be an integer . in practice , one then might obtain @xmath150 and @xmath80 from a subsidiary measurement whose result is approximated by the gamma distribution . in such cases , one must require @xmath151 to keep the posterior normalizable . note that in this form , @xmath152 is the mean of the @xmath5 prior , @xmath153 is the mode , and @xmath154 is the variance . the subsidiary measurement is often analysed by other experimenters , who chose statistics to quote for their central value and uncertainty ( omitting additional likelihood information ) . it is then important to obtain @xmath150 and @xmath80 in a consistent way from the information supplied by the subsidiary measurement . if @xmath5 , for example , were estimated by a maximum likelihood method , one would identify the estimate with @xmath153 rather than @xmath152 . results have been presented on the performance of a purely bayesian approach to the issue of setting upper limits on the rate of a process , when @xmath0 events have been observed in a situation where the expected background is @xmath6 and where the efficiency / acceptance factor @xmath155 has been determined in a subsidiary experiment . we find that this approach , when using a flat prior for the rate , results in modest overcoverage . plots of the expected sensitivity of such a measurement and of the coverage of the upper limits are given . it will be interesting to compare these with the corresponding plots for other methods of extracting upper limits , to be given in future notes . reference @xcite provides the limit calculating software associated with this study in the form of c functions . here we present the details of the analytical calculation of the posterior p.d.f . for @xmath3 . for generality , we work through the calculation with a @xmath133 prior ; a flat prior is then the special case @xmath156 . we measure @xmath0 events from a process with poisson rate @xmath157 , and we want the bayesian posterior for @xmath3 , given improper prior @xmath133 . we compute the posterior for fixed @xmath5 and @xmath6 in this subsection ; the calculation with our prior for @xmath5 follows in the next subsection . we have @xmath158 where all factors not depending on @xmath3 have already been absorbed into the normalization constant @xmath159 , which is defined by @xmath160 where we have performed the indicated change of variable . expanding @xmath161 in powers of @xmath162 using the binomial theorem , we get @xmath163 recognizing this as of the general hypergeometric form , we write it as @xmath164\ ] ] to make the hypergeometric nature more explicit . using the modern notation@xcite for the falling factorial @xmath165 this is expressed as @xmath166 where @xmath111 is the notation of @xcite . ( @xmath111 , a confluent hypergeometric function , is often written @xmath167 , and the relation given here is only valid for integer @xmath101 . ) note that @xmath168 is a polynomial of order @xmath0 in @xmath6 ( for @xmath0 a non - negative integer ) , and is related to the laguerre polynomials . when @xmath156 , we get @xmath169 , which is related to the incomplete gamma function . when @xmath170 , we get @xmath171 , which is infinite , so we require that @xmath142 . our posterior probability density for fixed @xmath5 is then given by @xmath172 the subsidiary measurement observes an integer number of events @xmath82 , poisson distributed as : @xmath173 where @xmath80 is a real number ( connecting the subsidiary measurement to the main measurement ) whose uncertainty is negligible , so @xmath80 can safely be treated as a fixed constant . @xmath80 might be thought of , for example , as based on a cross section that is exactly calculable by theory . there is negligible ( i.e. zero ) background in the subsidiary measurement . the prior for @xmath5 is specified to be flat . the bayesian posterior p.d.f . for @xmath5 is then @xmath174 ( or @xmath175 instead of @xmath176 in the denominator if you prefer ) . this is known as a gamma distribution . the mean and rms of this posterior p.d.f . summarize the result of the subsidiary measurement as : @xmath177 note that the observed data quantity in the subsidiary measurement is an integer @xmath82 , while the quantity being measured by the subsidiary measurement is a positive real number @xmath5 . next we compute the joint posterior @xmath178 using the @xmath133 prior for @xmath3 and our gamma distribution prior ( i.e. the posterior derived from the subsidiary measurement ) for @xmath179 @xmath180 where it is convenient to write @xmath150 for @xmath181 . we have for the joint posterior p.d.f . @xmath182 where @xmath183 we calculated @xmath159 above , so we have @xmath184 @xmath185 @xmath186 the marginalized posterior for @xmath3 can then be expressed as @xmath187ds= { s^{\alpha-1}\kappa^{\mu-\alpha}\mathcal{i}_\epsilon\over \gamma(\mu-\alpha)\gamma(\alpha+n)m(-n,1-n-\alpha , b)}ds\ ] ] where the integral @xmath188 is given by @xmath189 the same procedure that was used for the normalization integral can be applied here , producing @xmath190 @xmath191^k\ ] ] @xmath192 @xmath193 which has a particularly simple form when the background term is zero : @xmath194 a beta distribution of the 2nd kind . note that we must require @xmath195 to obtain a normalizable posterior . our posterior p.d.f . for @xmath3 with @xmath5 ( and @xmath6 ) fixed is recovered exactly by taking the limit of @xmath196 as @xmath197 . this means that the limit of @xmath198 as @xmath197 is identical to the value of @xmath198 when @xmath5 is known exactly . this property may seem obvious , but it is violated by some frequentist methods of setting limits , so it is worth mentioning . we need to integrate @xmath196 up to some limit @xmath29 , which can be done analytically as follows . @xmath199 where the substitution @xmath200 has been performed . re - expanding the polynomial @xmath111 and integrating term by term yields @xmath201 where @xmath202 is the standard notation for the incomplete beta function @xmath203 which also satisfies the following recursion : @xmath204 using the same technique as above , we can calculate the @xmath205th moment of the posterior p.d.f . as @xmath206 where we utilize the rising factorial notation@xcite @xmath207 the expression for the mean of the posterior when @xmath156 can be simplified using the identity @xmath208 obtaining @xmath209 note that the 2nd term is very small when @xmath138 . the recurrence relation@xcite @xmath210 leads to a recurrence relation between moments @xmath211 the special case @xmath156 then yields @xmath212\ ] ] which leads to this approximation for the variance of the posterior @xmath213 here we very briefly consider the case where the background parameter @xmath6 also acquires an uncertainty . this case is more general than the fixed @xmath6 case that is the main subject of this note : the fixed @xmath6 case will be the subject of additional studies employing various popular frequentist techniques , with the goal of comparing their performance . we judge the more general case considered in this subsection to be more complicated than necessary for the purpose of comparing the various methods , but it is instructive to document the fact that the bayesian method can easily handle the more general case . we assume a 2nd subsidiary measurement observing @xmath214 events ( poisson , as was the case for @xmath5 ) , which , when combined with a flat prior for @xmath6 , results in a gamma posterior for @xmath6 of the form @xmath215 where @xmath216 is a calibration constant ( analogous to @xmath80 in the subsidiary measurement for @xmath5 ) . the posterior for @xmath6 becomes the prior for @xmath6 in the measurement of @xmath3 . after determining the joint posterior @xmath217 by using our priors for @xmath3 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 , we marginalize with respect to @xmath5 and @xmath6 , resulting in @xmath218 where we write @xmath219 for convenience , and @xmath220 is the hypergeometric function@xcite . as long as @xmath0 is a non - negative integer and @xmath142 , @xmath221 is a polynomial of order @xmath0 in @xmath222 ( closely related to jacobi polynomials ) . this marginalized posterior for @xmath3 can then be integrated , with the result @xmath223 these two equations closely resemble the main results of sections [ postpdf ] and [ intpostpdf ] : to recover the fixed @xmath6 results , simply substitute @xmath224 for @xmath225 above , and take the limit @xmath226 . in this appendix we prove that bayesian credible intervals have average frequentist coverage , where the average is calculated with respect to the prior density . we start from the bayesian posterior density : @xmath227 for a given observed value of @xmath0 , a credibility-@xmath27 bayesian interval for @xmath3 is any interval @xmath228 $ ] that encloses a fraction @xmath27 of the total area under the posterior density . such an interval must therefore satisfy : @xmath229 or , using the definition of the posterior density : @xmath230 now for coverage . given a true value @xmath231 of @xmath3 , the coverage @xmath232 of @xmath233 $ ] is the frequentist probability that @xmath231 is included in that interval . we can write this as : @xmath234 s_\mathrm{l}(n)\le s\le s_\mathrm{u}(n ) } } p(n\,|\,s_\mathrm{t } ) . \label{eq : acbci2}\ ] ] next we calculate the average coverage @xmath235 , weighted by the prior @xmath22 : @xmath236\\[6 mm ] & \;=\ ; \int_{0}^{\infty}\sum_{\substack{\text{all $ n$ such that:}\\[1 mm ] s_\mathrm{l}(n)\le s\le s_\mathrm{u}(n ) } } p(n\,|\,s)\,\pi(s)\ , ds , & & \text{using equation ( \protect\ref{eq : acbci2 } ) , } \displaybreak[0]\\[6 mm ] & \;=\ ; \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\;\int_{s_\mathrm{l}(n)}^{s_\mathrm{u}(n)}\ ! p(n\,|\,s)\,\pi(s)\,ds , & & \text{interchanging integral and sum,\protect\footnotemark}\displaybreak[0]\\[6 mm ] & \;=\ ; \beta\ ; \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\;\int_{0}^{\infty}\ ! p(n\,|\,s)\,\pi(s)\,ds , & & \text{using equation ( \protect\ref{eq : acbci1 } ) , } \displaybreak[0]\\[6 mm ] & \;=\ ; \beta\ ; \int_{0}^{\infty}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty } p(n\,|\,s)\,\pi(s)\,ds , & & \text{interchanging sum and integral,}\displaybreak[0]\\[6 mm ] & \;=\ ; \beta\ ; \int_{0}^{\infty}\!\pi(s)\ , ds , & & \text{by the normalization of } p(n\,|\,s ) , \displaybreak[0]\\[6 mm ] & \;=\ ; \beta , & & \text{by the normalization of } \pi(s ) .\end{aligned}\ ] ] this completes the proof . we have assumed here that the prior @xmath22 is proper and normalized to 1 , but the proof can be generalized to improper priors such as those we considered in this note . a constant prior for example , can be regarded as the limit for @xmath237 of the proper prior : @xmath238 where @xmath239 is @xmath240 if @xmath241 and @xmath242 otherwise . we then _ define _ the average coverage for the constant prior as the limit : @xmath243 the previous proof can now be applied to the argument of the limit and leads to the same result . the average coverage theorem remains valid when @xmath3 is multidimensional , for example when it consists of a parameter of interest and one or more nuisance parameters . in that case one needs to average the coverage over _ all _ the parameters . m. j. bayarri and j. o. berger , `` the interplay of bayesian and frequentist analysis '' , statistical science 19 , p 58 ( 2004 ) , + projecteuclid.org/dienst/ui/1.0/summarize/euclid.ss/1089808273 , + www.isds.duke.edu/~berger/papers/interplay.html . peter clifford , `` interval estimation as viewed from the world of mathematical statistics '' , cern yellow report cern 2000 - 005 , p 157 ( 2000 ) , _ proceedings of the workshop on confidence limits at cern , 1718 january 2000 _ , edited by l. lyons , y. perrin , and f. james , + doc.cern.ch/yellowrep/2000/2000-005/p157.pdf . giovanni punzi , `` a stronger classical definition of confidence limits '' , hep - ex/9912048 , www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/9912048 . gnter zech , `` confronting classical and bayesian confidence limits to examples '' , cern yellow report cern 2000 - 005 , p 141 ( 2000 ) , _ proceedings of the workshop on confidence limits at cern , 1718 january 2000 _ , edited by l. lyons , y. perrin , and f. james , doc.cern.ch/yellowrep/2000/2000-005/p141.pdf . d. karlen , `` credibility of confidence intervals '' , in _ proceedings of the conference on advanced techniques in particle physics , durham , 1822 march 2002 _ , edited by m. whalley and l. lyons , p 53 , ( 2002 ) , + www.ippp.dur.ac.uk/workshops/02/statistics/proceedings/karlen.pdf . gary feldman , `` multiple measurements and parameters in the unified approach '' , _ fermilab workshop on confidence limits 2728 march , 2000 _ , p 11 , + conferences.fnal.gov/cl2k/copies/feldman2.pdf , + huhepl.harvard.edu/~feldman/cl2k.pdf . joel heinrich , `` user guide to bayesian - limit software package '' , cdf internal note 7232 , ( 2004 ) , + www-cdf.fnal.gov/publications/cdf7232_blimitguide.pdf ; + cdf statistics committee software page , + www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/statistics/statistics_software.html . r. l. graham , d. e. knuth , and o. patashnik , `` concrete mathematics : a foundation for computer science '' , 2nd ed . , ( addison - wesley , reading , ma , 1994 ) ; planetmath mathematics encyclopedia , + planetmath.org/encyclopedia/fallingfactorial.html . m. abramowitz and i.a . stegun , editors , `` handbook of mathematical functions '' , ( united states department of commerce , national bureau of standards , washington , d.c . 1964 ; and dover publications , new york , 1968 ) , chapter 13 . m. abramowitz and i.a . stegun , ibid . , chapter 15 ; william h. press , et al . , `` numerical recipes '' , 2nd edition , ( cambridge university press , cambridge , 1992 ) , 5.14 and 6.12 , lib-www.lanl.gov/numerical/bookcpdf/c5-14.pdf , + lib-www.lanl.gov/numerical/bookcpdf/c6-12.pdf . for bayes 90% limits , for the simple case of no background and no uncertainty on @xmath244 . the dotted line at @xmath245 is given to show that the coverage never falls below 90% ( in this simple case ) . ] vs @xmath3 for @xmath246 , 3 , 5 , 10 . in each case , @xmath43 and @xmath39 ( i.e. @xmath40 and @xmath82=99).,title="fig:",width=302]-0.2 in vs @xmath3 for @xmath246 , 3 , 5 , 10 . in each case , @xmath43 and @xmath39 ( i.e. @xmath40 and @xmath82=99).,title="fig:",width=302 ] + vs @xmath3 for @xmath246 , 3 , 5 , 10 . in each case , @xmath43 and @xmath39 ( i.e. @xmath40 and @xmath82=99).,title="fig:",width=302]-0.2 in vs @xmath3 for @xmath246 , 3 , 5 , 10 . in each case , @xmath43 and @xmath39 ( i.e. @xmath40 and @xmath82=99).,title="fig:",width=302 ] + Abstract:
[ "we address the common problem of calculating intervals in the presence of systematic uncertainties . we aim to investigate several approaches , but here describe just a bayesian technique for setting upper limits . the particular example we study is that of inferring the rate of a poisson process when there are uncertainties on the acceptance and the background . limit calculating software associated with this work is available in the form of c functions ." ]
12,015
12,015
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the discovery of the planet around 51 pegasi ( mayor & queloz 1995 ) has spurred an avalanche of observations over the last 15 years , leading to a census of almost 700 confirmed planets to date . within this data we can find a variety of exotic and unexpected systems , such as planets with short orbital periods , extreme orbital eccentricities , or systems with strong resonant interactions . these observations have also inspired a wealth of theoretical work , on both the origin and structure of such planets . furthermore , planet searches have continued to push the observational thresholds towards lower masses , with current observations now probing below @xmath5 ( mayor et al . 2009a , b ; leger et al . 2009 ; howard et al . 2011 ; batalha et al . 2011 ) , with the hope of eventually finding planets that may convincingly be argued to be hospitable to life . despite the wealth of data and interpretation now available , it is still difficult to draw together the different elements into an overall synthesis , in large part because of the heterogeneous nature of the observations . however , in the next few years a variety of observations offer the possibility to provide new constraints , which may allow us to frame a rigorous context for planet formation and evolution . recently , howard et al . ( 2010 ) and mayor et al . ( 2011 ) published the results of volume limited radial velocity surveys of nearby sun - like stars . the importance of these studies is that one can now begin to compare the relative frequencies of different types of planets , illuminating which are the generic product of the planet formation process , and which are the exotica . the results suggest that lower mass planets ( @xmath6 ) are even more common than gas giants at short periods , and that they appear to form a distinct population for orbital periods @xmath7 days . particularly striking is the fact that the low - mass planet distribution appears to show an upper edge in a plot of mass versus orbital period ; planets are found with masses between the completeness limit of the survey and an upper limit ranging between @xmath8 at @xmath9 day and @xmath10 at @xmath11 days . this is in contrast to the results of the predominant planet population synthesis models ( e.g. ida & lin 2008 ; mordasini , alibert & benz 2009 ) , which predict that this mass range ( @xmath12 ) should be liberally populated with partially - accreted giant planet cores ( `` hot neptunes '' ) that have migrated in from larger radii . in addition to the radial velocity surveys , the kepler satellite has begun to release the contents of its large - scale transit catalogue ( borucki et al . 2011 , lissauer et al . the majority of the present sample are still unconfirmed ` candidates ' , but a variety of tests suggest that the true planetary yield from this sample is expected to be high ( borucki et al . 2011 ) . the kepler sample once again has the advantage of being drawn from a relatively homogeneous program , and the distribution of planetary radii supports the aforementioned claim that the dominant species of short period planets corresponds to radii and masses below that expected from gas giant planets ( howard et al . 2011 ; wolfgang & laughlin 2011 ; youdin 2011 ) . these new surveys highlight the importance of short - period low - mass planets , as the low - mass planets now appear to outnumber their more massive brethren . the origins of such hot neptunes and ` super - earths ' is still poorly understood . most models of their formation ( alibert et al . 2006 ; terquem & papaloizou 2007 ; raymond , barnes & mandell 2008 ; mordasini et al . 2009 ; ida & lin 2010 ; mcneil & nelson 2010 ) adopt the position that they form at larger radii , in a manner related ( if not similar ) to the planets uranus and neptune in our own solar system , and then migrate inwards , to be trapped closer to the star . however , quantitative comparisons with the properties of observed systems remain unsatisfactory ( mcneil & nelson 2010 ) . ultimately , many of the problems with these calculations stem from the properties of the migration models assumed . although the notion of gaseous disk migration has a long , physically motivated provenance ( e.g. goldreich & tremaine 1980 ; ward 1997 ) , the nature of the migration and when it occurs is still a subject of significant uncertainty ( see kley & nelson 2012 for a recent review ) . the principal reason for the revival of interest in migration models was the notion that hot jupiters were emplaced in this fashion ( e.g. lin , bodenheimer & richardson 1996 ) . however , it is becoming clear that these systems represent a small minority of all planetary systems ( e.g. howard et al . 2010 ; mayor et al . 2011 ) and may therefore reflect rather special circumstances . indeed , there is a growing accumulation of recent results demonstrating the misalignment of stellar spin and planetary orbits in many hot jupiter systems ( e.g. winn et al . 2011a and references therein ) . the simplest interpretation is that at least some hot jupiters did not migrate through a gas disk . furthermore , it is no longer clear that migration implies a monotonic inward motion ( e.g. paardekooper & mellema 2006 ; oishi , mac low & menou 2007 ; adams & bloch 2009 ) . with the large numbers of @xmath13 planets now seen at short periods , where the simplest migration models suggest they should not be , indicates that large radial movement need not be ubiquitous in planetary systems . motivated by this renewed skepticism , we have chosen to revisit the question of in situ accumulation of rocky planets on small scales , and to explore the consequences of planet assembly without significant late - time gaseous migration . however , we will consider the possibility that significant radial migration is possible for smaller bodies , before they accumulate into planets , and so we will allow for disks with a wide variety of masses , discussed in [ inventory ] . in [ accum ] we then present the results of a series of traditional in situ planetary accumulation models on scales of 0.051 au , from the resulting disks . in [ accretion ] we investigate the consequences of gas accretion onto the massive rocky cores that form . we address the role of jupiter mass planets in [ hotties ] and evaluate the possible role of photoevaporation in [ evap ] . the prototypical initial condition for assembly of a planetary system is the ` minimum - mass solar nebula ' ( weidenschilling 1977a ; hayashi 1981 ) , based on an estimate of the material required to form our own planetary system . the required surface density of solids ( based here on the hayashi estimate ) is @xmath14 with the gas surface density @xmath15 times larger . this applies interior to the ` snow line ' ( taken to be at @xmath16 au ) . exterior to the snow line the available material in solids is a factor of four higher , reflecting the fact that more volatile elements are able to condense and form solids as the nebular temperature drops . this enhancement brings the solid / gas ratio closer to the estimated metallicity of the sun , which presumably reflects the original composition of the nebular gas . if we integrate this surface density we infer a mass in solids of 3.3@xmath17 interior to 1 au , @xmath18 inside the snow line , and 25.5 @xmath17 within 10 au . this inventory is the minimum amount of mass required to match the solar system planets , but factors of two or three more are not unreasonable , if we assume a certain inefficiency in the process of converting nebular material into planets . in addition , many planet hosting stars are known to show super - solar atmospheric abundances ( gonzalez 1998 ; santos , israelian & mayor 2001 ; fischer & valenti 2005 ; udry & santos 2007 ) , often up to a factor of two . as such , we can reasonably argue for an increase in the above inventory of solids by a factor of five . thus , the simplest extension of the mmsn mass accounting could plausibly provide 17@xmath17 inside 1 au , 29@xmath17 inside the snow line , and 128@xmath17 inside 10 au . the above estimates are still very much in the spirit of the original mmsn model , in which solid material condenses out of a gaseous nebula and accumulates in situ to form planets from the local reservoir of material . however , the modern view of nebular and planetary evolution is considerably more dynamic . recent models have focused largely on the migration of planet - sized bodies , but it has been known for a long time that the dust and small rocks from which planets form are also potentially subject to significant radial migration ( weidenschilling 1977b ; nakagawa , sekiya & hayashi 1986 ; youdin & shu 2002 ; bai & stone 2010 ) . if a significant fraction of the solid material can migrate interior to 1 au while it is still in the form of small bodies , then the potential reservoir of material for the accumulation of terrestrial - class planets could be considerably larger . we will consider mass reservoirs up to 100 @xmath17 , corresponding to a radial concentration of mass by factors of at least 10 . the nature of the processes that produce such radial concentrations is still a subject of active research , and it is not guaranteed that the solids will preserve the same radial profile as the original gas disk . thus we will consider solid surface density profiles with a range of slopes . there is a long history of studies of terrestrial planet accumulation in our own solar system . we adopt the oligarchic model of kokubo & ida ( 1998 ) as our starting point , which provides an analytic prescription for a protoplanetary system consisting of a sequence of annuli , each dominated by a single planetary embryo . simulations of the last stages of gravitational interaction and accumulation of embryos into planets in this model , using n - body techniques ( chambers & wetherill 1998 , agnor , canup & levison 1999 ; chambers 2001 ; raymond , quinn & lunine 2006 ) , shows that configurations of three or four planets emerge naturally from a minimum mass solar nebula disk , although the low masses of mercury and mars in the solar system may require a more localised initial distribution of mass ( hansen 2009 ) . the production of multi - planet systems is fairly robust with respect to varying the amount of mass and the disk density profile ( raymond , quinn & lunine 2005 ; kokubo , kominami & ida 2006 ) , although the masses of the planets tend to scale with the reservoir mass . prior simulations of this process have generally restricted themselves to distances @xmath19 au because of the lack of any closer planet in the solar system ( and shorter timesteps add unecessarily to the computational burden ) . this is also often motivated on the basis of arguments regarding the chemistry of volatiles and a presumed reduction in the mass fraction that condenses out of the nebula . however , our knowledge of nebula dynamics and chemistry is sufficiently poorly constrained that it is prudent to examine the dynamical consequences of different disk masses regardless , and argue about the underpinnings later . thus , in the following , we will examine the assembly of terrestrial planet - class systems from power law surface density distributions of solid material extending down to 0.05 au and up to 1 au . we use the n - body code mercury ( chambers 1999 ) to simulate the final stages of accumulation of planetary embryos , born of the oligarchic model , into planets around a @xmath20 star . we have performed a series of simulations of disks that extend from 0.05 to 1 au , while varying the total mass and surface density profile , to assess whether such an initial distribution can produce the planetary systems observed in a homogenously selected sample , such as that by howard et al . ( 2010 ) . in order to resolve the orbital dynamics at the inner edge of the disk , we use timesteps of 12 hours ! fortunately , most of the interesting dynamics in these collisional accumulation simulations occurs within a fixed number of orbits , so that the compact systems simulated here evolve very rapidly in absolute terms . we evolve our systems to 10 myr , which is sufficient to produce dynamically stable final results . we have verified this by evolution of selected systems to 100 myr and 1 gyr , and have observed little significant change . results of these and subsequent simulations are collected in the table [ simparam ] . we consider three surface density profiles , all of the power law form @xmath21 , and examine models with @xmath22 and @xmath23 . this encompasses a wide range of behaviour and is taken to represent the range of uncertainty in the initial conditions , given the possibility that this might be sculpted by radial migration of solids from large scale to small . with each choice of @xmath24 , we normalise the surface density to have a particular mass of solids interior to 1 au . we choose three different representative normalisations , of 25 , 50 and 100 @xmath17 . in each case , we start with the surface density profile consisting of a series of protoplanetary embryos realised according to the oligarchic distribution described in equations 17 & 18 of kokubo & ida ( 2002 ) , spaced out between 0.05 au to 1 au . for the disk masses considered here , which are larger than usually assumed , the mass of the initial oligarchs can sometimes reach several @xmath17 , and one might be concerned that such bodies are massive enough that their mutual perturbations would invalidate the assumption of mutually independent radial annuli . in appendix [ democratic ] , we have also investigated models in which we restrict the mass of oligarchs to be less than @xmath25 , and we found no meaningful difference in the eventual outcomes . figures [ snap0][snap2.5 ] show the characteristic evolution of three different disks . all have the same total mass ( @xmath26 ) within 1 au , but distributed according to surface densities with different slopes . the disk with the flattest profile ( @xmath27 ) is shown in figure [ snap0 ] . in this case , the masses of the initial oligarchs increase rapidly with radius , scaling with the area of individual annuli . the consequence of this is that the most massive planets at the end are located from 0.51 au . this is somewhat too large a radius to match most of the observations , which , at the time of writing , are most complete for orbital periods of 100 days or less . figure [ snap1.5 ] shows the evolution for an intermediate slope ( @xmath28 ) . here we find that the most massive final planets are found between 0.2 and 0.5 au . although the original oligarchs still increase in mass with semi - major axis , there is sufficient mass on smaller scales so that the faster dynamical evolution results in the accumulation of mass into a few large , comparable - mass objects by 10 myr . figure [ snap2.5 ] shows the evolution of a disk with a steep density profile ( @xmath29 ) . in this case , the oligarch masses decrease with semi - major axis , and the final result retains many of the characteristics of the original mass profile , with the largest planets having the shortest orbital periods . the three histories shown here demonstrate the characteristic behaviour of the models steep density profiles result in a distribution of planet masses that decreases with increasing orbital period , while flatter profiles move the maximum planet mass to larger scales . the stochastic nature of n - body systems means that there is some variation in the total number and division of mass from one simulation to the next , but the general distribution of mass with semi - major axis is reasonably constant . for a fixed density profile , the final planet masses will also , obviously , scale with the total mass budget . figure [ param2_4 ] shows the mass and orbital period of the largest final planet for several simulations with @xmath28 ( the choice which comes closest to matching the observations ) . the open circles indicate a total disk mass of 100@xmath17 , the open triangles indicate @xmath26 and the crosses indicate a total mass of @xmath30 . the filled circles are the observed periods and masses of the largest bodies in systems detected by howard et al . ( 2010 ) ( jupiter mass planets will lie off the top of this plot ) . we see that the known super - earth candidates require total disk masses in the range @xmath31 . as noted in [ inventory ] , even the optimistic estimates of the static nebula solid inventory are not sufficient to meet this requirement of @xmath0@xmath1 needed to match the observed planets . such massive planetesimal disks are more plausible if we allow for the possibility of migration of solids from several au to small scales . another generic consequence of in situ accumulation of rocky planets is that the resulting systems are almost always multiple , and the degree of multiplicity and clustering can be characterised by a variety of statistics ( see chambers 2001 for a summary , and appendix [ stats ] ) that were initially developed to analyse the formation of the terrestrial planets of our own solar system . this proves a useful test of the in situ accumulation hypothesis , as we would then expect the observed systems to be primarily multiple , and to be consistent with the statistical distribution of the simulated systems . a complication for such a comparison is that the observations are likely to be still severely incomplete ( howard et al . 2010 ) and there may be many additional planets lurking in the observed systems , but we can hope for this to improve with time . however , there are some systems for which the noise levels are low enough to demonstrate the existence of multiple systems already . the howard et al sample contains several multiple systems , although some contain planets beyond 1 au , and so are not directly comparable to our calculations . however , there are two systems , 61 vir ( originally announced by vogt et al . 2009 ) and hd69830 ( originally announced by lovis et al . 2006 ) which contain multiple planets within the period and mass range under discussion .. ] figures [ param2 ] and [ param3 ] show the comparison of these two systems with the corresponding simulation results . in order to ensure a proper comparison , we do not count planets in the simulations whose radial velocity amplitude would be @xmath32 . figure [ param2 ] plots two statistical measures , @xmath33 and @xmath34 , of how the mass in the system is distributed with semi - major axis . the observed systems hd69830 and 61 vir are shown as well , where the range indicates an uncertainty in the global system mass because of the unknown inclination angle of the system to the line of sight , assuming coplanarity to within 5 degrees . again , we see that the @xmath35 model produces systems with similar values of both mass concentration and distribution in eccentricity and semi - major axis , whereas the shallower and steeper slopes can not do match all observed statistics simultaneously . to some extent this is not surprising , given the qualitative features of figures [ snap0][snap2.5 ] , although it is a more quantitative statement . figure [ param3 ] compares the measures of angular momentum deficit , amd , ( a measure of eccentricity and inclination spread ) and mass - weighted mean semi - major axis . the spread on the observed systems account for randomly varying the observed eccentricities according to the observed error bars , and allowing the unknown mutual inclinations to fluctuate randomly by 5 degrees . again , we see that the @xmath35 models bracket the observations . it is striking that both the 61 virginis and hd69830 parameters overlap with the simulated values , suggesting that it is possible to realise these observed systems within this model . the spread in the model statistics derives primarily from two sources . the variation in the mass concentration statistics ( figure [ param2 ] ) reflects the degree to which the mass is spread evenly amongst the surviving planets , or concentrated in one or two more massive bodies . the spread in the amd ( see appendix [ stats ] ) seen in figure [ param3 ] is caused primarily by one of the surviving planets having significant ( @xmath36 ) inclination with respect to the others . if such conditions apply to the observed systems , then their parameter range will be expanded from that shown here , in which we limited the amount of assumed mutual inclinations . the outlier systems in the simulation results usually result from an incomplete accounting due to one or more of the final bodies being too small to meet our radial velocity criterion . the result of these accumulation models suggests that both the 61 vir and hd69830 systems are consistent with in situ accumulation of rocky planets from disks of sufficient mass . it also suggests that many of the other systems in the howard et al sample should harbour planets not far below the current detection limits , as the ratio of the two most massive planets in the simulated systems ranges from 0.40.98 , with a median value of 0.78 . the ability of the in situ accumulation model to match the properties of the observed low mass planet population is encouraging , but the masses of the rocky bodies that result suggest that a reconsideration of the issue of gaseous accretion is warranted . in the traditional model of gaseous giant planet formation , the first stage is the collisional assembly of a rocky core , which eventually gravitationally captures gas from the surrounding nebula ( e.g. pollack et al . 1996 ) when it reaches as mass @xmath3 . the final planet masses in [ accum ] exceed this threshold , albeit in a much different region of the disk than the original cores of jupiter and saturn . therefore , the assumption that these planets are wholly rocky is likely to be in error . the question of gas giant formation on small scales was widely reconsidered upon the discovery of 51 pegasi and other ` hot jupiters ' . however , a consensus quickly emerged that these planets most likely formed on larger scales and migrated to their currently observed positions . part of this consensus was the finding , from detailed calculations of the core accretion process , that in situ formation was unlikely ( bodenheimer , hubickyj & lissauer 2000 ; ikoma , emori & nakazawa 2001 , rafikov 2006 ) . however , these findings rest largely on the assumed implausibility of assembling a massive enough rocky core on small scales , given traditional estimates of the rocky material reservoir . if the solid mass available is substantially enhanced by inward radial transport of material , then such massive cores are no longer an outlandish idea . furthermore , on these scales , the assembly timescales of the planets in [ accum ] is short , often @xmath37 years , and the system configurations are largely in place by @xmath38 years . thus , it is quite conceivable that cores of several earth masses are in place before the gas is removed from the system . as a demonstration of this , figure [ acc ] shows the temporal history of the accumulation in a representative simulation with total disk mass in solids of 50 @xmath17 interior to 1 au . the final configuration has 4 planets in the ` super - earth ' mass range interior to 1 au . the assembly of all four planets is largely completed within 1 myr and so it is quite likely that the planets achieve a significant mass while there is still gas present in the system . on scales @xmath39 au , detailed calculations suggest that the energy transport in a hydrostatic atmosphere above a rocky core is regulated by convection ( ikoma et al . 2001 ; rafikov 2006 ) . however , these authors also note that traditional estimates of the critical core mass on these scales become uncertain because the hill sphere radii of the resulting cores begin to approach the size of the disk scale height i.e. a core could potentially open a gap in the disk before the threshold mass is reached . for a disk temperature profile given by @xmath40 this is @xmath41 . the criterion for the planet to open a gap in the gas disk is to set the hill diameter of a planet of mass @xmath42 equal to the gas disk scale height @xmath43 , which yields @xmath44 this threshold mass is less than many of the simulated planets in [ accum ] and most of the observed planets in the howard et al thus , if the assembly of these planets takes place in the presence of gas , accretion is likely to occur . however , the final outcome will not be a traditional gas giant planet . the normal core accretion sequence of events proceeds through a sequence of hydrostatically supported atmospheres until runaway gas accretion occurs ( see rafikov 2006 for a review ) . however , for planets on these small scales , the hydrostatic atmosphere becomes tidally limited before instability sets in , and the opening of the gap limits the amount of gas accretion . therefore , tidally limited accretion from the disk will produce a different , gas - starved , branch of the core accretion family than is found on larger scales . for a gas disk of surface density @xmath45 , the gas mass within an annulus of half width equal to the hill sphere of a core of mass @xmath42 is @xmath46 where @xmath47 is the gas disk mass inside 1 au , and @xmath48 is the orbital semimajor axis of the core . the value @xmath49 corresponds to the gas mass in the standard hayashi minimum mass solar nebula . the relation between this mass and the solid mass will depend on whether or not solids migrate radially . if the gas is eventually accreted by the planet , then the final mass of the planet will result from the combination of the two estimates . in the case where both the gas and solids follow a profile with @xmath50 , this yields a constant core mass fraction for the final planet , @xmath51 suggesting core mass fractions @xmath52 , for ranges of disk mass from 13 the mmsn value . if the gas disk had a different profile , the core mass fraction will vary with orbital period . for a gas disk profile @xmath53 , the mass - period relation would be @xmath54 it is striking that this estimate seems to naturally produce planets in the right range of masses and orbital periods . for example , at the fiducial period of 50 days , we derive a gap opening core mass of 7 @xmath17 which results in a total mass of 2149@xmath17 , for gas disks within a factor of three of the mmsn . this naturally covers the range of the observed masses , with most of the currently observed planets falling in this intermediate class with comparable amounts of rock and gas ( see figure [ pm ] ) . there is potentially also an intermediate regime , where the planet core is large enough to maintain a gravitationally bound atmosphere but not big enough to open a gap in the gas disk . as the disk gas dissipates , the planet may retain enough of this gas to have a significant observational effect . this is the case treated by rafikov ( 2006 ) , whose estimate of the core instability threshold is really a criterion for the gravitionally bound gaseous atmosphere to be some fraction of the core mass . if we adopt an atmosphere fraction of 10% , rafikov s estimate ( in the case of the inner disk his equation 60 ) , amounts to @xmath55 this turns out to be very similar to equation ( [ gapmaker ] ) , so that there are probably few planets in the intermediate regime . if a planet accretes a non - negligible mass fraction of gas , the accretion is likely limited by the opening of a gap . thus , we envision two different outcomes for in situ rocky accretion , depending on the amount of mass available . traditional terrestrial class planets , such as those in the solar system , emerge from disks below some mass threshold so that the time to assemble bodies of several earth masses is longer than the gas dispersal timescale ( @xmath56 years ) . for larger mass disks , cores form that are massive enough to bind gaseous atmospheres of significant mass before the dispersal of the disk . this process is also self - limiting , as they will accrete enough gas to actually open a gap in the disk , which limits their masses to the observed values . it does not depend sensitively on the evolution of the background gas disk a difference from the traditional ` failed core ' model , often invoked to explain these objects ( e.g. mordasini et al . 2009 ; ida & lin 2010 ) . to determine the threshold of disk mass that divides the gas - poor and gas - rich systems , we have simulated the assembly of disks of various masses for an @xmath35 profile , and find that the threshold disk mass is @xmath57 of solids inside 1 au . for disk masses above this value , one or more planets can assemble , within 1 myr , to masses that satisfy equation ( [ gapmaker ] ) , and therefore should accrete gas . for lower mass disks , planets either never reach the threshold value or do so when the gas has dispersed , leaving behind rocky cores . figure [ pm ] shows the overall picture that emerges , along with the observed planets in the howard et al . sample . the solid and open points indicate planets and planet candidates . the dotted line indicates the threshold mass for gas accretion ( eqn . [ gapmaker ] ) . planets above this dotted line will frequently harbour non - negligible gaseous envelopes . the exact size of the envelope depends on the mass in the gaseous disk . the long - dashed line indicates the final mass if the gas accreted is given by equation ( [ gaplimit ] ) , and assuming a gas disk that contains @xmath58 inside 1 au ( equivalent to four times the mmsn value ) . the region between these two lines is approximately the domain of the neptune - like planets born in situ . the short - dashed line running diagonally from upper left to lower right divides the parameter space into regions where accretion of solid bodies is efficient ( to the left of the line ) and not efficient ( to the right ) . the in situ solid body accumulation process is largely conservative of mass on scales smaller than this , whereas planets that lie above the line are more likely to eject smaller bodies than to accrete them . these planets will not grow significantly , but rather will migrate inwards until they reach the accretion / ejection boundary given by the short - dashed line in figure [ pm ] ( murray et al . further accretion will drive planets inwards approximately along the boundary ( i.e. they will grow and migrate inwards ) . the fact that there are few objects located near the intersection of these lines suggests that concurrent migration and accretion in this fashion is not a significant contributor to the demographics of the observed populations . the accretion of gas will change the assembly history , because one or more bodies will increase in mass and therefore the gravitational perturbations on other bodies in the system will be stronger . to account for the effects of this , we repeated the in situ assembly simulations using the @xmath35 profile , but we stop the simulation at 0.1 , 0.3 and 1 myr to compare the masses of all bodies to the threshold value of equation ( [ gapmaker ] ) . if any body has crossed the threshold in the interim , we instantaneously increase the mass according to a model for gas accretion , and then continue the simulation . this model is not fully self - consistent as it does not treat the gravitational influence of the gas disk before it is accreted , nor does it account for any difference in the specific angular momentum of the accreted gas , but it does address the issue of how the rapid mass growth of some bodies affects the gravitational interactions that regulate the assembly of the n - body system into a final system of planets . after the last gas accretion episode the systems are run to ages of 10 myr . we examined two models for gas accretion . in the first , we started with a rocky disk of mass @xmath26 , @xmath35 and assumed gas was accreted according to equation ( [ gaplimit ] ) , i.e. , from a gas disk that also obeys @xmath59 , and with a mass three times the mmsn value . this gas disk mass is chosen to produce planets that trace the upper edge of the observed lower mass planet population . in the second model , we start with a lower mass rocky disk ( @xmath60 , @xmath35 ) and assume gas is accreted according to equation ( [ gasscale ] ) , i.e. , from a gas profile @xmath53 , with a mmsn normalisation . this is chosen to capture the median parameters of the observed low mass population . note that the gas and solid disks have different power law slopes , which is possible if the solid inventory was assembled by radial inward migration , and not in situ deposition . figure [ param4 ] shows the statistical comparison of these simulations with the observed parameters of 61 vir and hd69830 . both sets of simulations show an inward shift in terms of the mass - weighted semi - major axis . this is a result of the tendency of planets with shorter orbital periods to assemble more rapidly and therefore they are more likely accrete gas . the end result is that including gas accretion in the model tends to steepen the mass profile . we have therefore repeated the experiments using a slightly shallower rocky profile of @xmath61 , using two different normalisations ( total masses of 50 @xmath17 and 80 @xmath17 ) . in both cases , the gas accretion is given by equation ( [ gasscale ] ) . the results are shown in figure [ param7 ] . with the use of a steeper profile , both 61 virginis and hd69830 remain within the parameter space of the simulations , although the simulations are now biased to larger semi - major axis ( because there is a larger fraction of mass at large radii and so it is easier to assemble the critical core mass ) . the overall conclusion to draw is that simulations can produce a wide range of systems , depending on the original slope and the amount of gas accreted , bracketing those observed . the dynamical effect of the gas accretion is to accelerate the orbital instabilities and dynamical interactions that characterise the final stages of terrestrial planet assembly . figure [ ta22 ] shows an example of one system ( drawn from the @xmath35 case ) in which three different planets cross the threshold given by equation ( [ gapmaker ] ) , two at 0.1 myr , and a third at 0.3 myr . close examination of the various curves shows that a rapid increase in mass leads to orbital instability in neighbouring , less massive bodies . the ultimate result is frequent collisions , and occasionally accretion onto the star or ejection from the system . this example also shows a common occurrence in which two of the planets which accreted gas eventually merge . the end result of this simulation is that we are left with three planets , two of which possess substantial gas fractions , although somewhat less than indicated by equation ( [ gasscale ] ) because of the accretion of substantial amounts of rocky material during the final clearing stages . this plot also shows why the mass - weighted semi - major axis @xmath62 moves inwards for these simulations , relative to the purely rocky ones the innermost planets grow the fastest and accrete gas earlier . this shifts the mass distribution to shorter radii . nevertheless , accretion occurs for planets at larger radii in some simulations as well , and we also find collisions between planets on larger scales too . this offers an interesting avenue to get the upper envelope of the masses in figure [ pm ] even if the gas disk is not quite as massive as assumed in equation ( [ gaplimit ] ) . our model thus far has addressed the nature of the low mass population at short periods . the howard et al . ( 2010 ) sample also contains a handful of genuine jovian mass planets with orbital periods @xmath6350 days . these must arise in some other fashion . the original model for such planets was migration through a gas disk , but recent observations suggest the situation may be different . for planets with orbital periods of a few days , tidal capture from eccentric orbits might be an alternative model ( rasio & ford 1996 ; matsumura , peale & rasio 2010 ) . however , this seems less likely to produce a planet with orbital periods @xmath64 days , because tidal forces weaken rapidly with distance . the planetary system around the star 55 cancri may offer insights because it appears to contain members of both the low mass and high mass population . we have investigated several hypotheses to see which are consistent with the existence of the 55 cancri system . * can the disk of rocky material we invoke play the role of a dissipative medium in capturing an eccentric jupiter ? the model in which a high eccentricity planet is tidally captured was originally motivated by the onset of dynamical instability , which can potentially occur late in a planetary system s lifetime ( rasio & ford 1996 ) after the removal of the gas disk . we have therefore examined whether a rocky planet system as described in previous sections can capture and circularise a jovian mass planet injected into the system on a highly eccentric orbit . the short answer is that this model is wildly unsuccessful , because the mass of the injected planet is comparable to , or larger than , the entire mass budget of the disks we have considered . thus , the end result of this model is that the injected planet remains on an orbit with a slightly decreased semi - major axis , and partially circularised eccentricity , having ejected essentially all of the mass of the initial disk . to reduce the semi - major axis and eccentricity to the level required by observation would require more mass , and would leave very little surviving mass to make the other planets in the 55 cancri system . + * it is possible to generate rocky planets of jovian mass , given a large enough mass reservoir . in a model where the solid material is laid down from a marginally gravitationally stable @xmath65 surface density profile ( appendix [ gi ] ) , the resulting innermost planet is quite massive , @xmath66 , with orbital periods @xmath64 days ] . this opens the possibility for the formation of rocky planets of saturn mass in short period orbits . at present there is little evidence for the existence of such objects in the sample discovered in transit surveys , although that sample is heavily biased to shorter orbital periods , and is possibly dominated by the tidal capture of genuine gas giants from eccentric orbits . these simulations do not , however , faithfully reproduce the lower mass planets found in the 55 cancri system . nevertheless , if some fraction of protoplanetary disks are significantly sculpted by gravitational instability , this class of planets may eventually emerge in a sample like that of the kepler mission . * a hybrid version of the model in [ accum ] is to simply assume the giant planet was in place in the beginning through some other , unspecified , process ) in the case of the q=1.5 gas disk , which is much more massive . however , the rest of the 55 cancri system is consistent with a less massive disk . ] , and then to repeat our calculation of in situ accumulation with this additional component . the end result of such a simulation actually produces systems qualitatively similar to that of 55 cancri , as shown in figure [ 55match ] . we are able to produce both an inner planet and a system of planets further out . in the event of no gas accretion , the resulting planets are too small compared to the observed planets , but they do cross the threshold of equation ( [ gapmaker ] ) and should grow to appropriate mass . figure [ 55match ] shows this for the analogue of 55 cancri c. the conclusion is that the presence of a jovian mass planet in the disk does not impede the in situ assembly of planets along the lines we have investigated , and that the resulting dynamical environment can produce systems with similar organisation to 55 cancri . jovian mass planets can also potentially influence the assembly on sub - au scales even if they orbit farther out ( such perturbations are often advanced as potential causes for the low mass of the asteroid belt , and possibly mars e.g. chambers 2001 ) . there are several systems in the howard et al . sample which contain a gas giant at long orbital periods and a lower mass planet at shorter orbital periods . to investigate the degree to which an external jupiter could influence the assembly histories considered here , we have repeated the @xmath35 , 50 @xmath17 runs in the presence of a planet of mass 351 @xmath17 , orbital period 493 days , and @xmath67 . this is chosen based on the planet hd114783b , as an example . we find that planet assembly is largely unaffected interior to @xmath68 au ( orbital periods @xmath69 days ) . the bulk of our analysis applies to smaller scales and shorter periods , so that the general character of the solutions is largely unaffected by the presence or absence of jupiters on scales @xmath70 au . this is consistent with the approximate separation between jupiter and the asteroid belt in the solar system and the rule - of - thumb that a gas giant does not significantly reduce planet assembly interior to it s 3:1 mean motion resonance . it has been suggested by numerous authors that short period planets may experience significant atmospheric mass loss driven by irradiation from the central star ( e.g. lammer et al . 2003 ; yelle 2004 ; lecavelier des etangs et al . 2004 ; tian et al . 2005 ; murray - clay , chiang & murray 2009 ) . as a result , we need to consider how much of a limit this will place on the accretion or retention of gas by planets at short orbital periods . empirical estimates of the evaporation rate for exoplanets are based on the so - called ` energy diagram ' , in which the gravitational binding energy of the planet ( @xmath71 ) is compared to the energy input ( @xmath72 ) from x - ray and euv radiation ( lecavelier des etangs 2007 , ehrenreich & desert 2011 ) , after accounting for various uncertain efficiency factors . using the estimates of ehrenreich & desert for the life - time averaged euv flux for the host star , we can rewrite the formula for the characteristic evaporation time , @xmath73 , as a mass - period relation @xmath74 where @xmath75 is the efficiency factor for converting incident radiation into mass loss ( set equal to unity here , so that this is a very generous estimate ) . the meaning of this equation is that planets with masses above this threshold are too large to experience significant dimunition through the evaporation process , under even very optimistic assumptions . we see that this relation has the wrong slope to explain the edge in figure [ pm ] , and will likely affect only the planets with periods @xmath76 days . the slope may be changed if we postulate a particular relationship between mass and radius , but not by much , as the mass - radius relationship for planets with gaseous envelopes is relatively flat in this mass range . therefore , evaporation is unlikely to be responsible for the shape of the mass - period relation in figure [ pm ] . nevertheless , it is likely to be important for the lowest mass , shortest period planets . in cases where the mass given by equation ( [ evaplim ] ) is greater than that given by equation ( [ gaplimit ] ) , the planet may very well accrete some gas , but it will likely lose it again over the course of time . thus , we may expect to see a transition from significant gaseous envelopes to thin , remnant envelopes below some period . estimating the period is somewhat uncertain because of the rather unconstrained nature of @xmath75 , but it likely lies in the range of 3.7 days ( @xmath77 ) to 8.5 days ( @xmath78 ) . motivated by recent observational challenges to the prevailing paradigm of exoplanet migration , we have re - examined the role that in situ accumulation might play in the assembly of planets on small scales , with masses ranging up to several tens of earth masses . we have demonstrated that the observed properties of planets in the hot neptune``/super - earth '' mass range , orbiting solar mass stars with periods of days to several months , can be reproduced with a simple model of in - situ accumulation of rocky planets from traditional oligarchic conditions , without any additional radial migration . however , in order for this to be the case , the original amount of rocky material required is @xmath79 within 1 au . this is somewhat in excess of that expected from traditional estimates of the mass profiles of protoplanetary disks , but could be achieved if there was significant radial migration of solid material from the outer parts of disks to the scales of interest , before the migrating bodies achieved the mass of planetary embryos . thus , our calculations argue that migration of solid material did indeed occur , but that it served to rearrange the mass budget of the nebula before the final stages of planet assembly . such a position is not without physical foundation , as the timescale for small bodies to migrate over au scales through the action of aerodynamic drag forces can be as small as @xmath80 years ( weidenschilling 1977b ; nakagawa et al . 1986 ; youdin & shu 2002 ; bai & stone 2010 ) . a further consequence of such a mass concentration is that the collisional assembly of planets is fast enough that bodies of several earth masses can form within 1 myr of the original material being emplaced . if this growth occurs in the vicinity of a gas disk , accretion and gravitational retention of gas from the nebula is possible . the accretion of this gas is limited , however , by the fact that it is easier to open a gap in the gas disk on smaller scales , and the accretion may be quenched before the accretion flow enters the traditional runaway regime in the core instability scenario ( e.g. rafikov 2006 ) . this process provides a natural mechanism for the production of planets with comparable amounts of gas and rock , intermediate between the traditional classifications of rocky terrestrial planets , and gas - dominated giants . figure [ mx ] shows the heavy element fraction of planets of various mass formed in our simulations , compared to published estimates for observed hot neptunes around solar mass stars . it should be noted that many of the published systems do not strictly fall within the bounds of our model ( e.g. hd149026b ) in terms of the parameter space of figure [ pm ] . furthermore , our crude estimate of a tidally - limited gas accretion ignores a lot of potentially interesting physics that determines the final mass of a planet embedded in a gas disk . in particular , planets that open gaps in disks can continue to accrete gas if the disk viscosity is high enough to allow flow into the gap ( e.g. artymowicz & lubow 1996 ; bryden et al . 1999 ; kley 1999 ) . based on the formulae of lin & papaloizou ( 1979 ) or taniguchi & ikoma ( 2007 ) , we estimate that disks with @xmath81 ( shakura & sunyaev 1973 ) may result in further gas accretion across the gaps we have estimated here . nevertheless , it is interesting that the simple considerations outlined above provide a natural framework for producing planets of this observed class . it is particularly encouraging that the objects on this plot most likely to fall within our model are the kepler-9 planets , which match the results of our simulations quite well . the quantitative agreement between observations and model is in striking contrast to the failures of traditional migration - based models ( alibert et al . 2006 , terquem & papaloizou 2007 ; ida & lin 2010 ) to match the same observations ( mcneil & nelson 2010 ) . the neptune mass analogs in these calculations formed further out and represent ` failed cores ' of giant planets , whose inward migration due to disk torques quenches the gas accretion that would produce a traditional gas giant . multiplicity is often important in the survival of such objects , as strong mutual gravitational interaction can serve to slow the migration and avoid spiralling into the central star . however , the effects of such strong interaction imprints itself on the final system , even after the loss of gas and further dynamical evolution ( ida & lin 2010 ; mcneil & nelson 2010 ) . recent observations of hot jupiters have cast doubt on the migration of gas giants as well , suggesting that perhaps the very idea of planetary migration needs to be extensively reviewed ( although we stress that the inventory of solids invoked in our model most likely still requires significant radial migration of solid material ) . we should be clear , however , that the model presented here is not complete , as we have not addressed the details of how these systems are related to those with hot jupiters or jupiters on more traditional scales . our aim is to better understand the individual physical processes at work before attempting a complete synthesis of all known planetary systems . furthermore , it is now evident that the lower planet mass systems are the most generic kind , and that stars which host hot jupiters are a small minority . it may thus be useful to consider our models independently of those developed for hot jupiters , which could represent only one very special case amongst the pathways to planetary system formation . our original discussion was purposely limited to the sample of howard et al . ( 2010 ) because of the homogeneity of selection . mayor et al . ( 2011 ) recently released a catalog of detections from a homogeneously selected sample of their own . in addition to 61 vir and hd 69830 , their sample contains seven more stars with at least three sub - jupiter mass companions . figure [ param6 ] shows a comparison of these systems with the same models as discussed before . the model range encompasses nearly all of these , with hd 10180 ( lovis et al . 2011 ) , hd 31527 and hd 136352 located closest to the bulk of the simulation points . several systems , such as hd 40307 and hd 39194 , could be brought closer to the main locus of points if additional planets are discovered in these systems with longer orbital period ( which seems likely in the case of hd 40307 , since mayor et al . 2009a also report the detection of a linear trend ) . conversely , hd 134606 has an anomalously large @xmath82 , which could be made consistent if another planet is found in the system with orbital period @xmath83 days . as a check on the howard et al . sample , figure [ pmall ] shows the harps ( mayor et al . 2011 ) and kepler - based exoplanet samples in the orbital period - mass plane , along with the proposed physical classification based on our model . at the lower right , at masses below those given by equation ( [ gapmaker ] ) , planets are not large enough to accrete significant gas and thus are likely to be truly rocky planets . this is a regime that is poorly explored as yet , although current radial velocity limits are slowly inching lower . above this limit , and at orbital periods @xmath84 days , we expect to find cores which have accreted substantial , but not overwhelming , gaseous envelopes . within our model , the bulk of the planets in this period and mass range are expected to be more like neptunes than scaled - up rocky planets ( a.k.a . super - earths ) . this is consistent with the newly emerging constraints from kepler , which suggests planetary radii for this class of object that require substantial gaseous envelopes ( holman et al . 2010 ; lissauer et al . further encouragment comes from the analysis of howard et al . ( 2011 ) , who estimate that planets with masses @xmath85 and periods @xmath7 days have substantial gas fractions on average , while those at lower masses are less gas - rich . evaluating our equation ( [ gapmaker ] ) at a mean period for the howard sample @xmath86 days , yields a mass of 5@xmath17 . as the observations and analysis improve , we expect that this division will be found to rise to higher masses at longer orbital periods . although the criterion is based on the ability of a core to gravitationally retain gas ( e.g. ikoma et al . 2001 ; rafikov 2006 ) , if the ordering of mass with semi - major axis is preserved to the present day , it would represent strong evidence that there was little orbital evolution post assembly . for orbital periods @xmath4 days , the division between the two classes is less uncertain because of the possibility that a gaseous envelope could be accreted but then removed over time . the fact that the observations tend to group near the line in figure [ pmall ] is a tantalising suggestion that evaporation could be very efficient . if true , it would suggest that most of the planets with @xmath87 days , and @xmath88 are neptune - like planets that have experienced significant erosion over the course of their lifetime . the essential point of these calculations is that many of the quantitative features of the observations can be modelled within a relatively simple in situ accumulation formalism . as such , several aspects of the more general astrophysical context need to be addressed , but the agreement with the observations argues that the basic model is correct . the mechanism(s ) by which heavy elements are concentrated in the inner parts of the nebula remain to be properly quantified . although the mobility of small bodies in protoplanetary nebulae is well established , the precise nature of the material rearrangement will depend on the properties of the background nebula . similarly , the effects of a residual gas disk on the damping of planetary eccentricities and inclinations is something to be considered . however , moeckel & armitage ( 2012 ) have shown that the statistical outcome of planetary scattering remains largely unaffected by the presence of gas . they do identify a subpopulation of low eccentricity orbits in their population , but presently the observations are still in excellent agreement with the outcomes of pure n - body calculations ( e.g. figure [ pmall ] ) . the model also predicts a period - dependent threshold mass that separates true rocky planets from those with comparable amounts of rock and gas . this will be quantitatively tested as more low mass planets are found , but already finds some statistical support in the planet candidates uncovered by kepler ( howard et al . 2011 ; wolfgang & laughlin 2011 ; youdin 2011 ) . the authors thank phil armitage , ravit helled , kristen menou , hilke schlichting and chris thompson for discussions and comments . is supported by the nasa atp program . is supported in part by the canada research chair program and by nserc of canada . adams , f. c. & bloch , a. m. , 2009 , apj , 701 , 1381 agnor , c. b. , canup , r. m. & levison , h. f. , 1999 , icarus 142 , 219 alibert , y. et al . , 2006 , a&a , 455 , l25 artymowicz , p. & lubow , s. h. , 1996 , apj , 467 , l77 bai , x .- & stone , j. m. , 2010 , apj , 722 , 1437 batalha , m. , et al . , 2011 , apj , 729 , 27 bodenheimer , p. , hubickyj , o. & lissauer , j. j. , 2000 , icarus , 143 , 2 borucki , w. b. et al . , 2011 , apj , 736 , 19 bryden , g. , chen , x. , lin , d. n. c. , nelson , r. p. & papaloizou , j. c. b. , 1999 , apj , 514 , 344 burrows , a. et al . , 2007 , apj , 661 , 502 carter , j. a. , winn , j. n , gilliland , r. & holman , m. j. , 2009 , apj , 696 , 241 chambers , j. e. , 1999 , mnras , 304 , 793 chambers , j. e. , 2001 , icarus , 152 , 205 chambers , j. e. & wetherill , g. w. , 1998 , icarus , 136 , 304 chambers , j. e. , wetherill , g. w. & boss , a. p. , 1996 , icarus , 119 , 261 dawson , r. i. & fabrycky , d. c. , 2010 , apj , 722 , 937 ehrenreich , d. , & dsert , j .- m . , 2011 , arxiv:1103.0011 fischer , d. a. & valenti , j. , 2005 , apj , 622 , 1102 gammie , c. , 2001 , apj , 553 , 174 goldreich , p. & tremaine , s. , 1980 , apj , 241 , 425 gonzalez , g. , 1998 , a&a , 334 , 221 hansen , b. m. s. , 2009 , apj , 703 , 1131 hartman , j. d. , et al . , 2011 , apj , 728 , 138 havel , m. , guillot , t. , valencia , d. & crida , a. , 2011 , arxiv:1103.6020 hayashi , c. , 1981 , prog . suppl . , 70 , 35 holman , m. et al . , 2010 , science , 330 , 51 howard , a. w. et al . , 2010 , science , 330 , 653 howard , a. w. et al . , 2011 , apj , 726 , 73 ida , s. & lin , d. n. c. , 2008 , apj , 685 , 84 ida , s. & lin , d. n. c. , 2010 , apj , 719 , 810 ikoma , m. , emori , h. & nakazawa , k , 2001 , apj , 553 , 999 kley , w. , 1999 , mnras , 303 , 696 kley , w. & nelson , r. p. , 2012 , arxiv:1203.1184 kokubo , e. , kominami , j. & ida , s. , 2006 , apj , 642 , 1131 kokubo , e. & ida , s. , 1998 , icarus , 131 , 171 kokubo , e. & ida , s. , 2002 , apj , 581 , 666 lammer , h. , selsis , f. , ribas , i. , guinan , e. , bauer , s. j. , & weiss , w. , 2003 , apj , 598 , l121 laughlin , g. , & rozyczka , m. , 1996 , apj , 456 , 279 leger , a. , et al . , 2009 , a&a , 506 , 287 lecavelier des etangs , a. , vidal - madjar , a. , mcconnell , j. c. & hebrard , g. , 2004 , apj , 621 , 1049 lecavelier des etangs , a. , 2007 , a&a , 461 , 1185 lin , d. n. c. , bodenheimer , p. & richardson , d. c. , 1996 , nature , 380 , 606 lin , d. n. c. & papaloizou , j. , 1979 , mnras , 186 , 799 lissauer , j. j. , et al . , 2011b , nature , 470 , 53 lissauer , j. j. et al . , 2011a , apj , 197 , 8 lovis , c. et al . , 2006 , nature , 441 , 305 lovis , c. et al . , 2011 , a&a , 528 , a112 matsumura , s. , peale , s. j. & rasio , f. a. , 2010 , apj , 725 , 1995 marcy , g. , butler , p. , fischer , d. , vogt , s. , lissuaer , j. & rivera , e. , 2001 , apj , 556 , 296 mayor , m. & queloz , d. , 1995 , nature , 378 , 355 mayor , m. et al . , 2009a , a&a , 493 , 639 mayor , m. et al . , 2009b , a&a , 507 , 487 mayor , m. et al . , 2011 , arxiv:1109.2497 mcneil , d. s. & nelson , r. p. , 2010 , mnras , 401 , 1691 moeckel , n. & armitage , p. j. , 2012 , mnras , 419 , 366 mordasini , c. , alibert , y. & benz , w. , 2009 , a&a , 501 , 1139 murray , n. , b. hansen , m. holman & s. tremaine , 1998 , science , 279 , 69 murray - clay , r. a. , chiang , e. i. & murray , n. , 2009 , apj , 693 , 23 nakagawa , y. , sekiya , m. & hayashi , c. , 1986 , icarus , 67 , 375 oishi , j. s. , mac low , m .- & menou , k. , 2007 , apj , 670 , 805 paardekooper , s. j. & mellema , g. , 2006 , a&a , 459 , l17 pollack , j. b. , hubickyj , o. , bodenheimer , p. , lissauer , j. j. , podolak , m. & greenzweig , y. , 1996 , icarus , 124 , 62 rafikov , r. , 2006 , apj , 648 , 666 rasio , f. a. & ford , e. b. , 1996 , science , 274 , 954 raymond , s. n. , barnes , r. & mandell , a. , 2008 , mnras , 384 , 663 raymond , s. n. , quinn , t. & lunine , j. i. , 2004 , icarus , 168 , 1 raymond , s. n. , quinn , t. & lunine , j. i. , 2005 , apj , 632 , 670 rice , w. k. m. & armitage , p. j. , 2009 , mnras , 396 , 2228 rogers , l. a. & seager , s. , 2010 , apj , 712 , 974 santos , n. c. , israelian , g. & mayor , m. , 2001 , a&a , 373 , 1019 shakura , n. i. & sunyaev , r. a. , 1973 , a&a , 24 , 337 taniguchi , t. & ikoma , m. , 2007 , apj , 667 , 55 terquem , c. & papaloizou , j. c. b. , 2007 , apj , 654 , 1110 tian , f. , toon , o. b. , pavlov , a. a. & de sterck , h. , 2005 , apj , 621 , 1049 udry , s. & santos , n. c. , 2007 , ara&a , 45 , 397 vogt , s. et al . , 2009 , apj , 708 , 1366 ward , w. r. , 1997 , icarus , 126 , 261 weidenschilling , s. j. , 1977a , ap&ss , 51 , 153 weidenschilling , s. j. , 1977b , mnras , 180 , 57 winn , j.n . , et al . , 2011a , aj , 141 , 63 winn , j. n. et al . , 2011b , apj , 737 , l18 wolfgang , a. & laughlin , g. , 2011 , arxiv:1108.5842 yelle , r. v. , 2004 , icarus , 170 , 167 youdin , a. & shu , f. , 2002 , apj , 580 , 494 youdin , a. , 2011 , apj , 742 , 38 for the kinds of disk masses considered in this paper , the oligarchic formalism of kokubo & ida ( 1998 ) can produce bodies with masses @xmath89 or more . with masses this large , one might wonder whether the long - range gravitational perturbations between neighbouring annuli become important sooner , and perhaps the assumption of initially independent annuli no longer holds . to examine this , we have repeated our calculations but have restricted the maximum size of an oligarch to @xmath25 . the bodies are still spaced by annuli with width ten times the hill radius , and so the overall surface density distribution is preserved . in table [ democheck ] we show the statistics for 5 realisations of this model , for a disk with power law @xmath28 and total mass @xmath26 . these can be compared with the results of the runs run@xmath9012 in table [ simparam ] . we see that there is little difference in the final statistical measures . the only noticeable difference is that the runs for this section lose a few percent of material in scattered and ejected bodies , which leads to a slightly higher probability that one of the surviving bodies will have a radial velocity signature @xmath32 . as a result we quote two sets of statistics for some of the runs in table [ democheck ] . the first line represents the direct comparison to other simulations . in those cases where we show a second set of values for a simulation , it means that one of the surviving planets would not have been detected with a 1 m / s radial velocity threshold . the second line shows the statistics calculated if we include those planets that would likely have been missed . the equations collected here offer a brief description of each of the statistical measures used in the text . further information can be found in chambers ( 2001 ) and references therein . the angular momentum deficit is defined as @xmath91 } { \sum_j m_j \sqrt{a_j}}\ ] ] where @xmath92 , @xmath93 , @xmath94 and @xmath95 are the mass , semi - major axis , eccentricity and inclination of the j - th particle . it is a measure of how much the orbits in the system deviate from the case of circular , coplanar orbits , which represent the state of maximal angular momentum per unit energy . the mass - weighted semi - major axis is @xmath96 and is a measure of where the mass is eventually accumulated . the mass concentration statistic is given as the maximum value of the function @xmath97 ^ 2 } \right)\ ] ] as the semi - major axis @xmath48 is varied . the orbital spacing statistic is @xmath98 where @xmath99 is the mean mass of the planets , and @xmath100(@xmath101 ) is the semi - major axis of the shortest ( longest ) period of the n planets in the system . this quantity is often considered a measure of the long - term dynamical stability of the system , as it bears a qualitative similarity to the average spacing of the planets measured in terms of their hill radii , @xmath102 . dynamical simulations can determine the threshold value of these parameters for long term stability ( e.g. chambers , wetherill & boss 1996 ) , but require some choices with regards to the masses of the various components . thus , we have repeated this calculation for the specific case of interest here . we consider three - planet systems , with the middle planet at 0.35 au . the planet masses are given by equation ( [ gasscale ] ) , and two other planets in the system were placed at equal separation @xmath103 on either side . the results suggest that stability is achieved for @xmath104 au , corresponding to @xmath105 . comparison to figure [ param6 ] shows that nearly all the observed systems satisfy this criterion . the two that do not are gliese 876 ( which corresponds to a pair of jupiter mass planets orbiting an m - dwarf in resonance ) and kepler-11 ( which satisfies this criterion if the mass of the outermost planet , kepler-11 g , lies somewhat below the currently quoted upper limit ) . in the early stages of star formation , the mass fraction of material in the disk may be substantial and the disk may exhibit a variety of large scale gravitational instabilities . this can also lead to significant radial transport of gas and dust ( e.g. laughlin & rozyczka 1996 ; gammie 2001 ) and may result ina somewhat different radial profile than those considered above . thus , we will also consider a model in which the solid distribution is deposited in situ , but from a gas disk which follows a disk profile dictated by setting the toomre parameter to @xmath65 , which we take as the marginally stable end state of a gravitationally unstable disk . the temperature profile is also somewhat different because the disk is heated by the dissipation inher ent in the mass transport . based on the results of rice & armitage ( 2009 ) , we assume a constant temperature @xmath106 k interior to 1 au , and derive @xmath107 where we have used a conversion factor of @xmath108 between gas and solid material . this is a small fraction of the gas metallicity , but captures the likely inefficiency of sedimentation at these temperatures . the assembly of embryos , drawn from this distribution , into planets proceeds in the same way as in the other simulations , except for the fact that there is considerably more mass available . the final planets produced have masses that range up to @xmath1 . this particular scenario may never be realised in practice , but is worth calculating if only to demonstrate that the gap in the observed masses is the result of the available reservoir of material , not of the physics of assembly itself . it is only when the masses begin to approach the ejection / accretion division shown in figure [ pm ] that the process of collisional accumulation becomes self - limiting . lccccc|cccccc run@xmath109 & 230 & 1.75 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 2 & 99.3 & 36.5 & 0.073 & 8.5 & 0.168 + run@xmath109 & 230 & 1.75 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 2 & 127.5 & 31.1 & 0.012 & 10.3 & 0.291 + run@xmath109 & 230 & 1.75 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 2 & 97.9 & 29.4 & 0.027 & 13.5 & 0.161 + run@xmath111 & 25 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 79 & 1 & 16.3 & @xmath110 & 0.034 & @xmath112 & 0.545 + run@xmath113 & 25 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 79 & 1 & 12.5 & @xmath110 & 0.1011 & @xmath112 & 0.485 + run@xmath114 & 25 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 79 & 1 & 9.9 & @xmath115 & 0.0005 & @xmath112 & 0.906 + run@xmath116 & 50 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 2 & 46.1 & 38.6 & 0.0136 & 22.8 & 0.740 + run@xmath117 & 50 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 3 & 27.1 & 21.2 & 0.0084 & 17.3 & 0.738 + run@xmath118 & 50 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 3 & 27.1 & 17.5 & 0.0031 & 45.0 & 0.705 + run@xmath119 & 50 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 3 & 42.7 & 26.3 & 0.0081 & 15.8 & 0.717 + run@xmath120 & 50 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 3 & 32.1 & 15.6 & 0.0013 & 59.9 & 0.734 + run@xmath121 & 50 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 3 & 28.0 & 11.4 & 0.0006 & 87.1 & 0.750 + run@xmath122 & 50 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 2 & 28.0 & 21.5 & 0.0014 & 43.3 & 0.767 + run@xmath123 & 50 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 1 & 40.5 & @xmath110 & 0.0194 & @xmath112 & 0.559 + run@xmath124 & 50 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 57 & 3 & 28.0 & 21.9 & 0.0148 & 16.4 & 0.755 + run@xmath125 & 100 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 41 & 2 & 61.3 & 23.4 & 0.0125 & 46.4 & 0.664 + run@xmath126 & 100 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 41 & 3 & 51.3 & 19.3 & 0.0020 & 37.2 & 0.628 + run@xmath127 & 100 & 0 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 41 & 4 & 50.3 & 18.5 & 0.0042 & 23.9 & 0.614 + run@xmath128 & 25 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 34 & 5 & 6.3 & 24.1 & 0.0114 & 6.2 & 0.401 + run@xmath129 & 25 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 34 & 3 & 10.2 & 36.6 & 0.0189 & 11.7 & 0.234 + run@xmath130 & 25 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 34 & 4 & 9.3 & 29.4 & 0.0136 & 6.9 & 0.380 + run@xmath90 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 3 & 17.3 & 32.1 & 0.0102 & 6.2 & 0.383 + run@xmath131 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 2 & 16.5 & 48.5 & 0.0417 & 11.3 & 0.156 + run@xmath132 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 2 & 23.3 & 48.7 & 0.0484 & 12.8 & 0.199 + run@xmath133 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 3 & 22.6 & 33.7 & 0.0033 & 5.1 & 0.513 + run@xmath134 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 4 & 19.9 & 24.6 & 0.0100 & 5.9 & 0.474 + run@xmath135 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 3 & 17.8 & 33.3 & 0.0059 & 8.4 & 0.304 + run@xmath136 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 4 & 11.7 & 30.4 & 0.0569 & 10.0 & 0.208 + run@xmath137 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 3 & 26.4 & 31.9 & 0.0395 & 7.4 & 0.341 + run@xmath138 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 4 & 15.9 & 34.0 & 0.0087 & 5.2 & 0.428 + run@xmath139 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 4 & 12.8 & 24.6 & 0.0094 & 8.6 & 0.286 + run@xmath140 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 3 & 23.3 & 33.9 & 0.0121 & 8.0 & 0.316 + run@xmath141 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 4 & 14.5 & 24.2 & 0.0076 & 6.4 & 0.384 + run@xmath142 & 100 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 18 & 5 & 28.3 & 16.8 & 0.0034 & 6.5 & 0.426 + run@xmath143 & 100 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 18 & 2 & 53.3 & 54.5 & 0.0067 & 13.6 & 0.588 + run@xmath144 & 100 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 18 & 4 & 37.3 & 20.5 & 0.0159 & 5.9 & 0.442 + run@xmath145 & 50 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 20 & 3 & 24.0 & 26.5 & 0.0093 & 13.8 & 0.132 + run@xmath146 & 50 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 20 & 3 & 19.4 & 30.9 & 0.0063 & 9.9 & 0.155 + run@xmath147 & 50 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 20 & 3 & 22.6 & 28.0 & 0.0125 & 16.1 & 0.123 + run@xmath148 & 50 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 20 & 4 & 19.8 & 19.4 & 0.0057 & 12.2 & 0.116 + run@xmath149 & 50 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 20 & 4 & 19.8 & 18.7 & 0.0040 & 14.8 & 0.102 + run@xmath150 & 50 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 20 & 5 & 16.6 & 17.3 & 0.0082 & 10.7 & 0.126 + run@xmath151 & 50 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 20 & 4 & 14.5 & 20.7 & 0.0023 & 13.8 & 0.110 + run@xmath152 & 50 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 20 & 4 & 14.5 & 21.2 & 0.0068 & 10.2 & 0.131 + run@xmath153 & 50 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 20 & 4 & 13.4 & 21.3 & 0.0039 & 11.8 & 0.133 + run@xmath154 & 100 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 14 & 4 & 40.5 & 21.0 & 0.0132 & 6.9 & 0.198 + run@xmath155 & 100 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 14 & 3 & 60.3 & 25.2 & 0.0099 & 9.3 & 0.165 + run@xmath156 & 100 & 2.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 14 & 4 & 49.7 & 18.6 & 0.0133 & 9.6 & 0.164 + + run@xmath157 & 50 & 1.5 & 2300 & 1.5 & 25 & 4 & 62.0 & 19.6 & 0.023 & 11.1 & 0.311 + run@xmath158 & 50 & 1.5 & 2300 & 1.5 & 25 & 4 & 60.7 & 20.6 & 0.011 & 10.9 & 0.267 + run@xmath159 & 50 & 1.5 & 2300 & 1.5 & 25 & 4 & 101.4 & 17.6 & 0.0047 & 9.6 & 0.354 + run@xmath160 & 50 & 1.5 & 2300 & 1.5 & 25 & 3 & 40.8 & 27.9 & 0.0230 & 6.8 & 0.315 + run@xmath161 & 50 & 1.5 & 2300 & 1.5 & 25 & 3 & 67.3 & 23.5 & 0.0091 & 12.8 & 0.230 + run@xmath162 & 50 & 1.5 & 2300 & 1.5 & 25 & 3 & 52.0 & 27.6 & 0.0146 & 6.8 & 0.301 + run@xmath163 & 50 & 1.5 & 2300 & 1.5 & 25 & 3 & 42.6 & 27.9 & 0.0145 & 8.1 & 0.259 + run@xmath164 & 50 & 1.5 & 2300 & 1.5 & 25 & 2 & 100.0 & 19.9 & 0.0059 & 34.3 & 0.410 + run@xmath165 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 4 & 22.1 & 23.9 & 0.0025 & 9.3 & 0.217 + run@xmath166 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 3 & 15.7 & 32.3 & 0.011 & 12.6 & 0.150 + run@xmath167 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 2 & 30.6 & 44.0 & 0.0025 & 11.3 & 0.196 + run@xmath168 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 4 & 28.9 & 24.0 & 0.0121 & 6.2 & 0.341 + run@xmath169 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 5 & 26.4 & 18.5 & 0.0891 & 7.4 & 0.313 + run@xmath170 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 5 & 13.9 & 20.2 & 0.0057 & 7.3 & 0.280 + run@xmath171 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 4 & 19.2 & 22.8 & 0.0097 & 6.7 & 0.317 + run@xmath172 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 3 & 18.7 & 35.5 & 0.0225 & 6.9 & 0.242 + run@xmath173 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 5 & 23.3 & 18.3 & 0.0063 & 5.6 & 0.350 + run@xmath174 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 3 & 32.9 & 34.1 & 0.0277 & 8.0 & 0.241 + run@xmath175 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 11 & 7.2 & 15.4 & 0.0007 & 6.1 & 0.442 + run@xmath176 & 40 & 1.5 & 767 & 1.0 & 30 & 1 & 43.2 & @xmath110 & 0.163 & @xmath112 & 0.106 + run@xmath177 & 50 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 30 & 4 & 28.2 & 20.9 & 0.0083 & 7.9 & 0.511 + run@xmath178 & 50 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 30 & 3 & 37.8 & 28.8 & 0.0011 & 10.6 & 0.344 + run@xmath179 & 50 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 30 & 3 & 51.1 & 27.9 & 0.0243 & 8.3 & 0.549 + run@xmath180 & 50 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 30 & 4 & 39.8 & 21.2 & 0.0042 & 8.6 & 0.511 + run@xmath181 & 50 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 30 & 3 & 55.4 & 25.9 & 0.0151 & 13.8 & 0.491 + run@xmath182 & 80 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 22 & 2 & 45.2 & 28.4 & 0.101 & 21.9 & 0.368 + run@xmath183 & 80 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 22 & 4 & 57.3 & 18.1 & 0.0078 & 9.1 & 0.580 + run@xmath184 & 80 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 22 & 3 & 49.5 & 25.7 & 0.0290 & 10.2 & 0.400 + run@xmath185 & 80 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 22 & 3 & 50.9 & 26.6 & 0.0352 & 10.6 & 0.339 + run@xmath186 & 80 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 22 & 2 & 57.3 & 31.2 & 0.0041 & 14.3 & 0.433 + run@xmath187 & 80 & 1.0 & 767 & 1.5 & 22 & 3 & 48.9 & 25.8 & 0.0086 & 7.4 & 0.500 + run@xmath188 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 3 & 11.8 & 33.3 & 0.0200 & 9.4 & 0.215 + run@xmath189 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 3 & 10.6 & 30.9 & 0.0305 & 10.4 & 0.194 + run@xmath190 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 25 & 3 & 14.5 & 30.8 & 0.0173 & 8.2 & 0.264 + lccccc|cccccc demo@xmath191 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 52 & 3 & 23.7 & 31.1 & 0.0254 & 6.5 & 0.379 + demo@xmath192 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 52 & 3 & 15.0 & 28.4 & 0.0214 & 13.1 & 0.291 + & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 52 & 4 & 15.0 & 25.3 & 0.0199 & 9.7 & 0.356 + demo@xmath193 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 52 & 2 & 17.0 & 45.3 & 0.0467 & 13.2 & 0.169 + & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 52 & 3 & 17.0 & 33.4 & 0.0471 & 7.6 & 0.272 + demo@xmath194 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 52 & 2 & 22.0 & 45.0 & 0.0495 & 13.9 & 0.174 + & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 52 & 3 & 22.0 & 36.0 & 0.0498 & 5.0 & 0.422 + demo@xmath195 & 50 & 1.5 & @xmath110 & @xmath110 & 52 & 3 & 21.0 & 34.2 & 0.0218 & 8.4 & 0.291 Abstract:
[ "we demonstrate that the observed distribution of ` hot neptune'/`super - earth ' systems is well reproduced by a model in which planet assembly occurs in situ , with no significant migration post - assembly . this is achieved only if the amount of mass in rocky material is @xmath0@xmath1 interior to 1 au . such a reservoir of material implies that significant radial migration of solid material takes place , and that it occur before the stage of final planet assembly . the model not only reproduces the general distribution of mass versus period , but also the detailed statistics of multiple planet systems in the sample . we furthermore demonstrate that cores of this size are also likely to meet the criterion to gravitationally capture gas from the nebula , although accretion is rapidly limited by the opening of gaps in the gas disk . if the mass growth is limited by this tidal truncation , then the scenario sketched here naturally produces neptune - mass objects with substantial components of both rock and gas , as is observed . the quantitative expectations of this scenario are that most planets in the ` hot neptune / super - earth ' class inhabit multiple - planet systems , with characteristic orbital spacings . the model also provides a natural division into gas - rich ( hot neptune ) and gas - poor ( super - earth ) classes at fixed period . the dividing mass ranges from @xmath2 at 10 day orbital periods to @xmath3 at 100 day orbital periods . for orbital periods @xmath4 days , the division is less clear because a gas atmosphere may be significantly eroded by stellar radiation ." ]
14,759
14,759
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: while string theory has had remarkable successes over the last several years , accelerated by the revolutions in understanding its non perturbative properties , it is still very much the case that we do not yet know what the theory is . we can not state unambiguously what the basic degrees of freedom are ( it is highly context dependent in a way that depends upon the dynamics themselves ) , and even the backgrounds in which the theory propagates are themselves open to interpretation . for example , in some descriptions and situations , the theory contains gravity , and in others , it does not . from some perspectives there are open strings present , and from others , only closed . ironically , several of these frustrating ( from the point of view of finding simple definitions ) features are also among the theory s most powerful positive traits , allow an ever widening range of applications of the theory to diverse problems , often of a strongly coupled nature . while applications continue , it is still important to try to get to grips with what the theory is . at the very least , this is important from a pragmatic standpoint , since perhaps a useful definition or characterization of string theory might be put to use as , for example , a diagnostic device in identifying when a physical problem may have some aspect of it that is amenable to solution by string theory methods . more generally , if string theory ultimately plays some fundamental role in the understanding of physics beyond the standard model , and/or in cosmology and other origins questions about the universe at large , a more profound understanding of the nature , power , and scope of the theory would seem to be highly desirable . at best , to date , as a result of various dualities , we know that it is probably part of some larger physical framework which itself is only string theoretic in various corners of its parameter space . this physical setting , called m theory , remains profoundly mysterious well over a decade after the first clear glimpses of it@xcite . historically , problems pertaining to such essential matters of understanding in physics are greatly illuminated by having a rich set of examples that are simple , but yet complex enough to contain all the important phenomena in question . for the problems outlined above , it would be rather excellent to have the simplest possible string theories that still contain some of the marvellous non - perturbative physics we know and love , and be able to follow them as they connect to each other in ways that are entirely invisible in perturbation theory . further icing on the cake would be to have the physics all captured in terms of relatively familiar structures for which there is an existing technology for its study . this is the subject of this paper ( and a follow up to appear later@xcite ) , at least in part . the simplest known strings with tractable non perturbative physics that contain a rich set of phenomena ( such as holography and open closed dualities ) are the minimal strings@xcite , and in particular ( where non perturbative physics is concerned ) the type 0 strings ( formulated in refs.@xcite and refs.@xcite , and recognized as type 0 strings in ref.@xcite ) . the non perturbative formulation of the type 0a and type 0b strings can be done rather beautifully in terms of certain integrable systems , as we will review later : type 0a has the korteweg de vries system while type 0b has zakharov shabat . the non perturbative physics of each is formulated in terms of associated non linear ordinary differential equations often called `` string equations '' . while much of the language of the two is similar , these are very different systems , and except for various accidental ( from the perspective of those separate formulations ) perturbative coincidences ( and a non trivial non perturbative equivalence for one model see later ) , the physics of each are quite separate indeed . this paper builds on all of these results , taking them much further . we have found that there is a larger framework into which the type 0a and type 0b string theories can be naturally embedded and within which they are connected as parts of a larger theory . we found further that the two string theories are merely special points in a much larger tapestry of possibilities . when perturbation theory is examined , other special points suggest themselves , and they turn out to be just as `` stringy '' as the original type 0 theories , deserving to be thought of as string theories as well . we begin the program of trying to identify some of these theories , with some success . we also find that the larger framework provides natural definitions of regimes of the type 0 string theories that are hard to define using perturbation theory , and we will report more fully on non perturbative aspects in a follow up paper@xcite . in this sense , we have a precise analogue of m theory . we have a larger physical framework that is not itself a string theory , but that can be readily specialized to yield string theories as special limits . we can move between different theories in a quite natural way , which is nonetheless outside the framework of any of its daughter string theories . we find this encouraging and exciting . at the base of our infinite family of string equations , organizing much of this remarkable structure , is a non linear differential equation known as painlev iv . this well known equation from the classical mathematics literature , part of a celebrated family of six equations , has two arbitrary constants , usually denoted @xmath7 and @xmath8 . ( actually , two copies of painlev iv turn up in our story , intertwined in an interesting way . ) it turns out that the type 0a and 0b points in the tapestry of theories occur at the vanishing of one or other of these constants for one of the copies of painlev iv . the vanishing of the constants of the second painlev iv hint at interesting new special points . after reviewing crucial aspects of the type 0a and 0b string theories in section [ sec : type0 ] , we unpack the dispersive water wave hierarchy and present the infinite family of equations we propose as the string equations in section [ sec : dww ] . section [ sec : painleve ] highlights the role of painlev iv . in section [ sec : connectab ] we show how the structures of section [ sec : type0 ] arise as special points in this larger framework , while section [ sec : beyond ] is a detailed study of the rich properties of the string equations and the types of solutions available . we organize and classify a great deal of the physics that appears , and notice in section [ sec : square ] that much of the physics can be organized in terms of a square . the square is reminiscent of the main square organizing the moduli space of @xmath9 ( two dimensional ) string theories , discovered in ref.@xcite , and we contemplate a possible connection , perhaps induced by renormalization group flow@xcite to the @xmath0 context of the work in question . the possible relation between the squares helps us make a conjecture about the nature of two new special points we find : they might be type iia and iib minimal string theories . ( note that these are type ii theories in the sense of the structure of the gso projection used to formulate them . there is no spacetime supersymmetry@xcite . ) in section [ sec : new ] we carry out a comparison of the new structures we found to some continuum computations for one loop partition functions . from this we strengthen aspects of our type ii suggestion . we conclude in section [ sec : conclusion ] with a brief summary and discussion . we will start with a brief review of the type 0 string theories coupled to the @xmath10 superconformal minimal models and show how these theories can be elegantly described within the framework of an integrable hierarchy of partial differential equations ( pdes ) accompanied by an hierarchy of ordinary differential equations ( odes ) . these models exhibit novel and interesting physics , all of which and more will be seen to be embedded in the dww system that we will describe in the next section . this review will help establish our notation and the framework upon which we can readily build the more general structure . we begin with the following ordinary differential equation ( known in the old days as a `` string equation '' ) @xmath11 this equation ( or , really , family of equations ) and its properties have been studied in several papers . it was first derived and studied as a fully non perturbative definition of a string theory in refs.@xcite , and evidence that it defines a type 0a string theory was presented first in ref@xcite . further properties of the equation , in particular concerning how branes and fluxes are encoded by it and the underlying integrable ( kdv ) system , were presented in refs.@xcite . here @xmath12 is a real function of the real variable @xmath13 , a prime denotes @xmath14 , and @xmath15 and @xmath16 are real constants . the quantity @xmath17 is defined by @xmath18 where the @xmath19 $ ] are polynomials in @xmath12 and its @xmath13derivatives , called the gelfand dikii polynomials@xcite . they are related by a recursion relation ( defining a recursion operator @xmath20 ) @xmath21 and fixed by the value of the constant @xmath22 and the requirement that the rest vanish for vanishing @xmath23 . some of them are : @xmath24 the @xmath25th model is chosen by setting all the @xmath26 to zero except @xmath27 and @xmath28 this number is chosen so that the coefficient as @xmath29 . if we had instead chosen @xmath30 , we would have chosen the coefficient of @xmath31 to be unity . ] of @xmath31 in @xmath32 is set to @xmath33 . the function @xmath12 defines the partition function @xmath34 of the string theory @xmath35 @xmath36 where @xmath37 is the coefficient of the lowest dimension operator in the world sheet theory . so @xmath12 is a two point function of the theory . from the point of view of the @xmath25th theory , all the other @xmath38 represent couplings of closed string operators @xmath39 . it is well known@xcite that the insertion of each operator is captured in terms of the integrable kdv hierarchy of flows describing how @xmath40 evolves in @xmath26 : @xmath41 for the @xmath25th model , equation ( [ streqn0a ] ) , which has remarkable properties@xcite , is known to furnish a complete non perturbative definition of a family of spacetime bosonic string theories @xcite . the models are actually type 0a strings @xcite , based upon the @xmath10 superconformal minimal models coupled to super liouville theory . as superconformal theories , they have central charge @xmath42 the asymptotic expansions for the first two @xmath25 are : @xmath43 @xmath44 @xmath45 @xmath46 it should be noted that the solution for @xmath47 can be numerically and analytically shown to match onto the solution for @xmath48 , providing a unique@xcite non perturbative completion of the theory . ( see figure [ fig : plot ] for an example of a solution found using numerical methods . ) type 0a solution showing how the perturbative regimes at large @xmath49 are smoothly connected . section [ sec : dww ] discusses a function @xmath50 ( @xmath51 ) , which has a number of different classes of behaviour distinguished by choice of boundary condition . the type 0a theory has class @xmath52 in the @xmath53 perturbative regime and class @xmath54 in the @xmath55 perturbative regime . here we have set @xmath56 and @xmath57.,title="fig:",width=453 ] + as instructed in equation ( [ 0afreeenergy ] ) , integrating twice the asymptotic expansions ( such as those in equations ( [ 0aexpnsk=1 ] ) and ( [ 0aexpnsk=2 ] ) ) furnishes the free energy @xmath58 , and it can be seen to define a perturbative expansion in the dimensionless string coupling @xmath59 for all models , in the @xmath60 regime , @xmath15 represents@xcite the number of background zz d branes @xcite in the model , with a factor of @xmath15 for each boundary in the worldsheet expansion . these are point like branes localized at infinity in the liouville direction @xmath61 , deep in the strong coupling region . in the @xmath62 regime , @xmath15 represents the number of units of rr flux in the background , with @xmath63 appearing when there is an insertion of pure rr flux @xcite . since there is a unique non perturbative solution connecting the two regimes , the string equation ( [ streqn0a ] ) supplies a non - perturbative completion of the theory that is a very clear example of a geometric transition between these two distinct ( d - branes @xmath64 rr fluxes ) spacetime descriptions of the physics . the function @xmath12 is the potential in the hamiltonian @xmath65 of the well known ( in the inverse scattering literature ) associated sturm liouville problem connected to the integrable kdv hierarchy . the wavefunctions of that problem define the partition functions of fzzt@xcite d branes stretched along the liouville direction @xmath61 , ending at a finite @xmath66 set by the eigenvalue . the zero energy problem is interesting@xcite , since there the fzzt d branes stretch to infinity , and the hamiltonian s factorization , @xmath67 where @xmath68 , is highly convenient . the function @xmath69 ( its definition in the equation before is termed a miura map in the integrable literature ) satisfies@xcite an infinite hierarchy of equations sometimes called the painlev ii hierarchy since the equation at @xmath70 is the painlev ii equation . the asymptotic expansion of @xmath71 generated by these equations is in terms of worldsheets involving zz d branes ( or fluxes ) and fzzt d branes . the entire problem defines a toy supersymmetric quantum mechanics problem within which the celebrated bcklund transformations of the kdv system can be made manifest . in this language the zz d branes are identified with the number of threshold bound states ( formally , zero velocity solitons ) of the system , and the bcklund transformations change their number by an integer . these more recently established features@xcite , together with the earlier identification@xcite of the role of the kdv flows in organizing the close string operators , show how the integrable model and inverse scattering technology of the mathematical physics literature comes to life in organizing the open and closed string content of minimal string theory . type 0b string theory coupled to the @xmath72 superconformal minimal models @xcite is described succinctly by the following string equations@xcite : @xmath73 where the @xmath74 and @xmath75 are polynomials of functions @xmath76 and @xmath77 ( and their derivatives ) , and @xmath16 and @xmath78 are real constants . the differential polynomials satisfy the following recursion relations @xmath79 where a prime denotes @xmath80 . some of them are : @xmath81 the function @xmath82 defines the partition function of the theory @xmath35 @xmath83 the @xmath84th model is chosen by setting all @xmath85 to zero except @xmath86 and @xmath87 , analogous to what was done in the previous section concerning the 0a case . note that these models have an interpretation as type 0b strings coupled to the @xmath88 superconformal minimal models only for even , lack of modular invariance of the partition function rules out the interpretation as type 0b strings coupled to superconformal matter @xcite . ] writing @xmath89 , we again have a set of models connected to the @xmath10 superconformal minimal models , this time type 0b . as in the 0a case , from the point of view of the @xmath25th theory , all the other @xmath26 represent coupling to closed string operators @xmath39 . again the insertion of each operator can be expressed in terms of the zakharov shabat@xcite hierarchy of flows , the underlying integrable system in this case : @xmath90 where @xmath91 . the asymptotic expansions of the string equations ( [ streqn0b ] ) for the first even @xmath92 are : @xmath93 @xmath94\ , \quad ( x \rightarrow \infty ) \nonumber\\ { \widetilde w}(x ) & = & \frac{\nu q\sqrt{2}}{4|x|^{1/2 } } - \frac{\nu^2 q^2}{4 |x|^2 } + \frac{\nu^3}{|x|^{7/2}}\frac{5\sqrt{2}}{64 } q\left(1 + 4q^2\right)+\cdots \quad ( x \rightarrow -\infty)\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath95 @xmath96 upon integrating twice , the asymptotic expansions in equations ( [ 0bexpnsm=2 ] ) and ( [ 0bexpnsm=4 ] ) furnish the free energy perturbatively as an expansion in the dimensionless string coupling , given by the same expression as before in equation ( [ 0astrcoupling ] ) . for these models , in the @xmath62 regime , @xmath78 represents the number of background zz d branes in the model , with a factor of @xmath78 for each boundary in the world sheet expansion , while in the @xmath97 regime it counts the number of units of rr - flux in the background@xcite . the asymptotic expansions in the two directions can be argued in ref.@xcite to match onto each other analytically in a particular ( t hooft ) limit . for the case @xmath70 , the full non perturbative solution is known since it can be mapped directly to the solution known for the @xmath70 type 0a case , as will be discussed below in section [ sec : connectingab ] . for later reference , we briefly discuss the structure of these solutions with increasing @xmath84 . as argued in ref.@xcite the @xmath98 expansions are deformations of the solutions of the equation with @xmath99 . however things get interesting for @xmath100 . as before , the @xmath101 solution is a deformation of the solution with @xmath99 . for @xmath102 , @xmath99 allows for the trivial solution @xmath103 , but trying to deform this for @xmath104 leads only to a complex solution . additionally , @xmath99 allows for two nontrivial solutions with @xmath105 and @xmath106 . these two are related by @xmath107 and are interpreted as @xmath108 symmetry breaking solutions . in the interpretation of ref.@xcite , this is due to the presence of r both these solutions have a real extension to the case with @xmath109 . the requirement of matching a @xmath102 solution to the @xmath101 solution picks out one of these for @xmath110 and the other for @xmath111 . ( the @xmath112 solution listed above is for @xmath110 . ) for higher @xmath84 , more such symmetry breaking solutions arise . we will see how this is organized explicitly in section [ sec : beyond ] . it turns out that the simplest case of @xmath113 ( @xmath70 ) , the 0a and 0b theories are non perturbatively related in a very special way . in this case the conformal model is trivial ( _ i.e. _ @xmath114 ) and we simply have the pure world sheet supergravity sector . the strings are unencumbered by a spacetime embedding ( not counting the ubiquitous liouville direction , @xmath61 ) . the string equation for the @xmath70 0a theory , equation ( [ streqn0a ] ) with @xmath115 , is @xmath116 on the other hand , the string equation ( [ streqn0b ] ) for the @xmath70 0b theory can be written succinctly as @xmath117 notice that the perturbative expansion for the @xmath70 0a theory as @xmath118 ( equation ( [ 0aexpnsk=1 ] ) ) looks similar to the perturbative expansion for the @xmath98 0b theory as @xmath119 ( equation ( [ 0bexpnsm=2 ] ) ) up to a ( non universal ) sphere term , once one identifies @xmath15 with @xmath78 . the two expansions are just offset by various powers of @xmath120 . in fact there exists a non perturbative map between the two equations @xcite that can be seen as follows . first define a function @xmath121 _ via _ @xmath122 for which the string equation for the 0a theory ( [ streqn0ak=1 ] ) becomes @xmath123 after rescaling using @xmath124 equation ( [ 0ak1to0bm2 ] ) becomes the string equation for the 0b theory ( [ streqn0bm=2 ] ) , but with the sign of @xmath125 reversed . the physics of pure 0a supergravity and pure 0b supergravity ( _ i.e. _ @xmath114 ) are non perturbatively related , with the brane and flux perturbative regions exchanged . this non perturbative connection between the 0a and 0b theories ( for @xmath70 ) follows , mathematically , from the fact that the same basic string equation appears at the base of the two separate ( kdv _ vs _ zs ) hierarchies of equations . this connection is partly in the spirit of a much larger set of connections that we are reporting on in this paper . we find that the kdv and zs structures are embedded in a much larger structure , the dispersive water wave hierarchy of equations , and find a class of connections ( of a different sort ) between 0a and 0b for all @xmath25 and see that they define two special corners of a larger tapestry of physical theories . the standard dispersive water wave ( dww ) hierarchy@xcite , which will play a central role in the new physics we uncover , is a two component system . it is described by : @xmath126 \quad , \ ] ] where @xmath127 , @xmath128 ( note that here and in the rest of the paper , for any function @xmath129 , @xmath130 will denote @xmath131 ) , and we adopt a matrix notation : @xmath132=\left(\begin{array}{c } l_n[u , v]\\ k_n[u , v]\end{array}\right ) \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath133 is the recursion operator for the dww hierarchy . the operator @xmath134 can be written as the quotient of two hamiltonian operators @xmath135 and @xmath136 , @xmath137 where @xmath135 and @xmath136 are given by @xmath138 the @xmath139 obey the recursion relation @xmath140 which follows immediately from ( [ dwwpde ] ) . the first few @xmath141 and @xmath142 are as follows : @xmath143 the normalization of @xmath144 is chosen so as to reproduce ( [ dwwpde ] ) for @xmath145 . + the dww hierarchy can be reduced to a one component system by demanding that one of the two independent functions vanish . if we set @xmath146 , we actually reduce to the kdv hierarchy : two operations of the ( reduced ) dww recursion operator give @xmath147 where @xmath148 is the recursion operator of the kdv hierarchy , shown in equation ( [ kdvrec ] ) . thus we obtain a reduction of the even flows of the original hierarchy ( [ dwwpde ] ) to @xmath149 which is the kdv system in @xmath150 with independent variable @xmath125 , and the even times of dww map to the times of the kdv @xmath151 . ( compare with equation ( [ kdvflow ] ) ) . + in addition , the recursion relation ( [ lrec ] ) reduces to @xmath152 which is exactly the kdv recursion relation ( [ kdvrec ] ) . the relative normalizations are @xmath153 and @xmath154 so we conclude that @xmath155 . moreover , with @xmath156 , it is immediate that @xmath157 . the other obvious reduction , @xmath158 , reduces the system to the burgers hierarchy . we do not explore if there are any string theory consequences of that in this paper , since @xmath50 is used to define the partition function of our theories in all our examples . integrable hierarchies of partial differential equations ( pdes ) can be reduced to ordinary differential equations ( odes ) through an additional condition on the variables . in our context , these odes are sometimes to be thought of as defining string theories ; they are the `` string equations '' of a family of theories , forming an hierarchy themselves . as outlined around equation ( [ kdvflow ] ) , string equations can be thought of as supplying the initial conditions for the partition function , and then the pdes of flows describe how the partition function evolves as a function of the operators that couple to the @xmath159@xcite . the original example of all this@xcite was a hierarchy of equations that have the painlev i equation as the non trivial equation at their base , indexed by an integer @xmath25 . they defined the bosonic @xmath160 string theories coupled to the @xmath161 conformal minimal models . it was later realized@xcite that another rich family of string equations ( those in equations ( [ streqn0a ] ) ) can be obtained by imposing certain scaling relations on the variables of the kdv system ( note however that the equations were originally derived@xcite directly from matrix model constructions analogous to the original route ) . with this in mind , we explore a similarity reduction of the dww hierarchy , expecting to obtain new string equations at the end of the day . we follow the approach originally used to derive the string equations of type 0a ( [ streqn0a ] ) for the kdv hierarchy @xcite . to that end , assign @xmath162 mass dimension 1 . the dimensions of the other terms uniquely follow from ( [ dwwpde ] ) and are @xmath163=\frac{1}{2}$ ] , @xmath164=-\frac{1}{2}$ ] and @xmath165=-\frac{1}{2}(n+1)$ ] thus we can write down two callan symanzik equations expressing the scaling symmetry , @xmath166 using ( [ dwwpde ] ) and ( [ lrec ] ) we can rewrite these equations , @xmath167 defining , @xmath168 we can rewrite ( [ cs1 ] ) , @xmath169 where we have used the fact that we will take @xmath170 and the other @xmath87 to be independent of @xmath125 . equation ( [ cs21 ] ) can readily be integrated . moreover , solving ( [ cs21 ] ) for @xmath171 and substituting the result into ( [ cs22 ] ) yields an expression , which , after multiplying by @xmath172 , can also be integrated . the results are our new coupled string equations , @xmath173 where we have introduced two integration constants , @xmath174 and @xmath15 . we stress that the simplest possibility is for @xmath174 and @xmath15 to be independent of @xmath125 _ and _ @xmath175 , though only independence of @xmath125 is strictly necessary . + the @xmath84th model is chosen by setting all @xmath175 equal to zero except for @xmath170 and @xmath87 which is chosen to be a numerical factor to fix the normalization . we choose to parameterize @xmath87 as @xmath176 in order to make direct contact with some recent literature which discusses this system in a much different ( mathematical ) context@xcite . let us focus on the case @xmath177 , which forms the bottom of the hierarchy of string equations from which all others follow using the recursion relations . the string equations in this case reduce to the painlev iv equation , an important equation from the mathematical literature . its appearance at the bottom of the ladder of string equations we re presenting here is significant . note that the entire family of string equations can be generated from this @xmath177 case by use of the recursion operator , and so structures at this level will be reflected at higher @xmath84 , even while the complexity of the equations increases . also notable is that this is the first time that a role for this equation has been uncovered in this context of non perturbative string theory , and it takes its place alongside the painlev i and ii equations whose roles ( mentioned earlier ) have been established in this context already . in fact , part of the motivation that led to the discoveries upon which we report here was the question as to the further role of the painlev equations in such systems . painlev iv emerged naturally as a candidate equation to play a role and this led to our studying of the dww system that we found connected to painlev iv in the literature@xcite . let us see more explicitly how the equation emerges . remarkably , it will naturally appear in two different ways@xcite . the string equations for @xmath177 are : @xmath178 where we have used the relation @xmath179 . solving the first of these for @xmath162 gives @xmath180 and substituting this into the second yields a second order ode in @xmath181 which , under the change of variables @xmath182 becomes @xmath183 y - \nu^2 \frac{1}{2 } \frac{\beta^2_1}{y } \quad .\ ] ] @xmath184 and @xmath185 are constants related to @xmath174 and @xmath15 in the dww string equations through @xmath186 setting @xmath187 , and dropping the subscripts on the constants , gives @xmath188 which is the fourth painlev equation @xmath189 in standard form , and @xmath190 we will see in the next section , specific constraints yielding the 0a and 0b theories that require @xmath191 and @xmath192 respectively . notably , these are precisely the values for which the constants @xmath7 and @xmath8 in the standard form of painlev iv vanish . in fact , there is another natural appearance of the painlev iv equation in this system@xcite , at @xmath177 . there is a natural generalization@xcite of the miura map ( that we saw for kdv in section [ sec : type0 ] ) to the dww system , defining new variables @xmath193 and @xmath194 : @xmath195 now , as we saw above , @xmath196 satisfies painlev iv with constants @xmath7 and @xmath8 given in equation ( [ eq : painleve ] ) . well , additionally , @xmath197 satisfies a copy of painlev iv ( equation ( [ eq : painleve ] ) ) also , but with constants related to our physical parameters by @xmath198 we take this seriously , not the least because the variables described by the miura map in the case of kdv ( type 0a ) were seen to be physically very natural , pertaining as they do to the fzzt and zz d branes . ( see the end of section [ sec:0a ] for a brief review . ) we expect therefore ( but this needs more exploration ) that this dww miura map also leads to rich physics . the cases @xmath199 and @xmath200 imply vanishing of @xmath7 and @xmath8 and may well have some special significance in this context . ( we will , for example , find special solutions for all @xmath84 corresponding to @xmath199 points . it is also interesting to note that the equations together point to the values @xmath201 , @xmath202 , values which do feature prominently in what is to follow . ) having introduced the dww hierarchy , we now show how both the type 0a and type 0b string theories coupled to the @xmath10 superconformal minimal models can be found embedded in this system . we show that by placing appropriate constraints on the full system of string equations , one can recover the respective string equations for both of the type 0 theories . quite beautifully , these constraints require one of the two integration constants @xmath203 to freeze to particular values . the remaining unfixed constant then acts as the parameter that counts the number of zz branes or units of r r flux in each theory , depending on which asymptotic region ( positive or negative large @xmath125 ) is under consideration . it was seen in section ( [ sec : dww ] ) that setting @xmath181=@xmath204 reduces the dww hierarchy to the kdv hierarchy . we therefore expect that this constraint also reduces our new string equations to the 0a string equations . that this indeed occurs can be seen as follows . equation ( [ lk ] ) gives , @xmath205&=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2}(n+1)t_n^{\mathrm{dww}}l_n \\ & = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2}(2n+1)t_{2n}^{\mathrm{dww}}l_{2n } \\ & = 4\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}(j+\frac{1}{2})t_{2j}^{\mathrm{dww}}p_{j } \\ & = \mathcal{r}[w ] \end{split}\ ] ] where we have used that @xmath206=@xmath207=0 $ ] and @xmath208=@xmath209=@xmath210=4p_n[w]$ ] ( see below ( [ kdvrec2 ] ) ) . the last equality holds provided that we make the identification , @xmath211 finally , we see that when @xmath156 and @xmath212 , equation ( [ dwwstring2 ] ) exactly reduces to equation ( [ streqn0a ] ) , _ i.e. _ our new string equations encode 0a string theory coupled to the @xmath10 superconformal minimal models . for even flows it is easy to show that @xmath156 is only consistent with the other string equation ( [ dwwstring1 ] ) if @xmath174 is frozen : @xmath213 so one of the parameters in the original dww equations becomes fixed when recovering type 0a coupled to the @xmath10 superconformal minimal models , while the other parameter @xmath15 counts the number of branes or units of rr flux in the type 0a theory . we will see this behaviour again in the case that we recover the type 0b theory . consider the following redefinition of the dww variables @xmath214 to the zs variables @xmath215 : @xmath216 the recursion relation ( [ lrec ] ) becomes , @xmath217 or , @xmath218 where we have defined , @xmath219 these are precisely the recursion relations of the zs hierarchy ( [ zsrec ] ) . moreover , the @xmath220 and @xmath221 just defined actually agree with those presented in ( [ zspoly ] ) . it suffices to check @xmath145 : from ( [ dwwpolys ] ) we have @xmath153 and @xmath222 which imply @xmath223 and @xmath224 , as expected . + finally , we may ask how we can produce the 0b string equations ( [ streqn0b ] ) from our new string equations ( [ dwwstring1 ] ) and ( [ dwwstring2 ] ) . the answer turns out to be simple and elegant : all we must do is set @xmath225 equation ( [ dwwstring1 ] ) then requires , @xmath226 which further implies , @xmath227 the @xmath87 required here to consistently produce the equations of @xcite are identical to the values we determined earlier ( [ tn ] ) . so , upon identifying @xmath228 , we have exactly produced the 0b string equations . + again notice how the consistency of our constraint @xmath229 with ( [ dwwstring2 ] ) forces one of our parameters to vanish @xmath230 leaving the parameter @xmath231 to count the number of zz branes or rr fluxes in the type 0b theory . finally , we remark that the partition function of the 0b theory is determined _ via _ @xmath232 so that @xmath150 encodes the partition function for both 0a and 0b . we have seen that constraining the dww string equations ( [ dwwstring1 ] ) appropriately leads to the 0a and 0b theories ( coupled to the superconformal @xmath10 series ) , respectively . the constraints take the system with two free parameters @xmath203 and define two special points : 0a with @xmath233 free ) and 0b with @xmath234 free , @xmath235 . we can also consider the fully unconstrained system with both parameters @xmath203 unfixed , and general @xmath236 . interestingly , we get _ multiple _ asymptotic expansions for the variable @xmath50 . the structure of the equations and the corresponding asymptotic expansions gets richer as @xmath84 increases . since in both cases , asymptotic expansions of @xmath50 gave us , upon integrating twice , an expansion of a partition function for a string theory , we look again for it to define an interesting partition function in the new cases we will encounter . while this is an assumption , we shall see it bear fruit presently . in this section we will first list the asymptotic expansions for the first few @xmath84 obtained from the corresponding string equations . we will explain the organizational rules we use to group these expansions into various classes . a careful analysis of the patterns we uncover in what follows allows us to extrapolate to higher @xmath84 and predict the structure of the expansions for any @xmath84 . we will see that a subset of these , when appropriately combined , reproduce the type 0 expansions that we have already encountered . in addition , we obtain _ completely new _ expansions which have not been presented in the literature before . our key observation here is that these also resemble perturbative sectors of string theories ( either with branes or fluxes present ) . we take these seriously as new string theories and our task after this section will be to identify what string theories they might be . the number of expansions grows large as @xmath84 increases ( we will see later that the number of expansions is @xmath237 ) . to deal with this proliferation of expansions , we classify them into classes whose members are related to one another by simple symmetries . the classes themselves are distinguished by a number of salient features , many of which we explore in what follows . we choose to define the classes based on their behavior at order @xmath238 ( this is equivalent to the leading behavior in @xmath239 , the sphere level of closed string perturbation theory , as we will see later ) . since dww is a two component system , we must consider the leading behavior of both functions , @xmath181 and @xmath162 . we adopt the following classification scheme : + @xmath240 + we postpone the detailed study of @xmath181 to subsequent work . here we mention its leading behavior only to complete the classification ; in what follows , we focus exclusively on @xmath162 and its asymptotic expansions . the details of sections [ sec : expandone][sec : expandfour ] , being a list of examples that we found instructive , might be a little dry on first reading and so the reader is encouraged to skip to section [ sec : general ] for the general case . the string equations for this case were already written in equations ( [ dwwn=1 ] ) . solving the first of these for @xmath162 gave equation ( [ dwwn=1v ] ) , and substituting into the second yields a scalar second order ode in @xmath242 ( equivalent to painlev iv ) , which can be used to produce the expansions . asymptotic expansions for @xmath242 can then be used to yield asymptotic expansions for @xmath50 using equation ( [ dwwn=1v ] ) . we obtain three classes of expansions for @xmath50 , @xmath243 upon integrating twice ( following what we learned from the type 0 theories in sections [ sec:0a ] and [ sec:0b ] ) , one can obtain the free energy for a genus expansion of a string theory which allows us to identify the string coupling to be @xmath244 . the other expansions within each class can be obtained by the following symmetry operation : @xmath245 since @xmath246 and @xmath247 contain only even powers of @xmath15 , the are invariant under this map ; however , @xmath248 . thus there are two expansions in the @xmath249 class , and , together with @xmath246 and @xmath247 , these comprise four total @xmath177 expansions . the string equations are : @xmath250 where again @xmath251 . solving the first of these for @xmath162 gives , @xmath252 substituting this into the second yields a scalar fourth order ode in @xmath181 , which can then be used to produce the expansions for @xmath162 . in this case , there are four relevant classes of expansions @xmath253 here , we see that the string coupling is @xmath254 . the other expansions within each class can be obtained by the following operations , @xmath255 and compositions thereof . some of the @xmath256 are invariant under one or both of these maps . altogether , there are nine distinct expansions . here are the four classes of expansions together with the number of distinct expansions within each class and the maps that lead to them : @xmath257 the string equations are too long to be written down explicitly here and so we omit them . four classes of expansions are produced in this case , and one sees expansions in class 5 appearing for the first time here . @xmath259 here the string coupling turns out to be @xmath260 the other expansions within each class can be obtained by the following operations , @xmath261 and any compositions of these maps . a quick calculation shows that there 16 different expansions @xmath262 our explicit string equations are rather complicated and so we will not list them here . the following five classes of expansions are obtained : @xmath264 here , the string coupling is @xmath265 . the other expansions within each class can be obtained by the following operations , @xmath266 and any arbitrary composition of those maps . a quick calculation shows that there are 25 distinct expansions . here are the five classes of expansions together with the number of distinct expansions within each class and the maps that lead to them : @xmath267 the expansions displayed above for @xmath177 to @xmath100 exhibit a rich structure which we explore shortly . first we briefly review the interpretation given to the parameter @xmath15 of the 0a theory ( and also to @xmath78 of the 0b theory ) . in the @xmath37 ( or @xmath125 ) @xmath268 regime , @xmath15 represents the number of background zz d branes in the model , with a factor of @xmath15 for each boundary in the worldsheet expansion . since an orientable surface with odd ( even ) euler characteristic must contain an odd ( even ) number of boundaries , @xmath15 must be raised to an odd ( even ) power if @xmath269 is . in addition , the power of @xmath15 must be less than or equal to the power of @xmath269 . on the other hand , in the @xmath37 ( or @xmath125 ) @xmath270 regime , @xmath15 represents the number of units of rr flux in the background , with @xmath63 appearing when there is an insertion of pure rr flux . so in this case both @xmath15 and @xmath269 should appear with even powers . + in applying these observations to our dww expansions , we immediately notice the remarkable fact that the various expansions have powers of the parameters which somehow allow for interpretations as counting branes or fluxes . this is by no means guaranteed , and indeed its occurrence was one of our main motivations for in depth study of the system . the presence of two parameters , however , leads to a few subtleties . for example , in some expansions an interpretation in terms of branes is only possible if one of the two parameters is set to zero . with keep such observations in mind as we begin the study of the various expansions . finally we note that the asymptotic direction ( _ i.e. , _ positive or negative @xmath125 ) of each expansion can be fixed by requiring that once we fix the value of @xmath271 , the expansion must be real ( which is an important constraint since @xmath162 encodes the free energy ) . the value of @xmath271 , in turn , can be fixed using the values listed in equation ( [ tn ] ) since we must reproduce the 0a theory . with all of these observations we are ready to begin analyzing our expansions . * @xmath272 contains powers of @xmath15 consistent with those of a parameter counting branes . this remains true for any value of @xmath174 . * @xmath272 contains powers of @xmath174 consistent with those of a parameter counting fluxes . however , for arbitrary @xmath15 , @xmath269 appears with odd powers , inconsistent with our requirements for a description of fluxes , as mentioned above . this problem is avoided if we set @xmath57 since this forces the odd powers of @xmath269 to vanish . * in particular , setting @xmath192 with @xmath271 given by equation ( [ tn ] ) reduces this expansion to the @xmath101 flux - expansion in @xmath174 ( or @xmath78 ) for the type 0b theory seen in equations ( [ 0bexpnsm=2],[0bexpnsm=4 ] ) for @xmath273 respectively . * alternatively , setting @xmath274 with the same value of @xmath271 reduces these expansions to those of the type 0a for @xmath101 . ( we listed them in equations ( [ 0aexpnsk=1 ] and [ 0aexpnsk=2 ] ) for @xmath275 respectively is related to kdv hierarchy index @xmath25 by @xmath92 . ] . ) * with the values of @xmath271 need to reduce to 0a and 0b , one obtains real expansions in this class _ only _ if @xmath276 . hence we fix this class of expansions to be @xmath277 asymptotic expansions . * this class of expansions only exists for even @xmath84 . * for even @xmath84 , @xmath246 contains powers of @xmath15 and @xmath269 consistent with those of a parameter counting fluxes . this is true for all values of @xmath174 . for odd @xmath84 , the powers of @xmath15 are still consistent with the flux interpretation , but there are odd powers of @xmath269 which are inconsistent with fluxes . these odd powers can be removed by setting @xmath278 . * for even @xmath84 , @xmath246 contains powers of @xmath174 and @xmath269 consistent with a parameter counting fluxes . this is true for all values of @xmath15 . for odd @xmath84 , the powers of @xmath174 are consistent with those of a parameter counting branes . in this interpretation , there are no contributions from surfaces with only one boundary . * setting @xmath279 with @xmath271 as chosen in equation ( [ tn ] ) , reduces the @xmath246 expansions to the type 0a expansions for @xmath102 . ( we listed them in equations ( [ 0aexpnsk=1 ] ) and ( [ 0aexpnsk=2 ] ) for @xmath275 respectively . ) * only even powers of @xmath271 and @xmath125 appear , so the requirement of reality does not fix the direction of these expansions . * consistency with the 0a expansions forces us to consider the expansions in this class as @xmath280 expansions . we note the possibility that these might appear as @xmath277 expansions outside of the simple type 0a context we ve seen so far type expansions ( for @xmath281 ) in both asymptotic directions for @xmath125 . clearly there are analogous rational solutions for the full dww equations that have @xmath246 asymptotic expansions that generalize the known cases . we have constructed large families of them , and leave their study for a later publication . ] . * these expansions vanish when @xmath282 . ( this is a likely special point(s ) in parameter space . we got a first hint of this point in section [ sec : painleve ] where the second copy of painlev iv has @xmath283 . ) * this class of expansions appears for all @xmath84 . * @xmath249 contains powers of @xmath15 consistent with those of a parameter counting branes . this is true only for @xmath278 . * @xmath249 contains powers of @xmath174 consistent with those of a parameter counting branes . this is true only for @xmath57 . * we notice that associating one boundary to each factor of @xmath174 _ and _ @xmath15 also produces a consistent worldsheet expansion . we might speculate about whether , in general , these expansions might capture @xmath174 and @xmath15 simultaneously counting branes . * setting @xmath192 with @xmath284 reduces these expansions to the @xmath102 brane - expansions for the type 0b theory for @xmath98 as seen in equation ( [ 0bexpnsm=2 ] ) . hence we fix the expansions in this class to be @xmath280 expansions . * at @xmath100 , the value @xmath285 with @xmath192 renders this expansion complex for @xmath112 . this fits in nicely with the structure of expansions observed in the 0b case , reviewed in that case did not have a real deformation for @xmath104 . the @xmath249 class is exactly the analogue of this trivial solution . ] in section [ sec:0b ] . * @xmath286 causes these expansions to vanish ( we got a first hint of this point in section [ sec : painleve ] where the second copy of painlev iv has @xmath283 . ) * this class of expansions exists for all @xmath84 , but is real as an @xmath102 expansion only for @xmath98 mod @xmath287 . * the @xmath247 class of expansions has not , to our knowledge , made a previous appearance in the literature , as it does not appear until encountering the dww system . * @xmath247 contains powers of @xmath174 consistent with those of a parameter counting branes . this remains true for any value of @xmath15 . * @xmath247 contains powers of @xmath15 consistent with those of a parameter counting fluxes . however , for arbitrary @xmath174 , @xmath269 appears with odd powers , inconsistent with our requirements for a description of fluxes , as mentioned above . this problem is avoided if we set @xmath278 since this forces the odd powers of @xmath269 to vanish . * the direction of @xmath247 is not immediately determined by the consistency conditions we have used so far . compatibility with the type 0 theories at @xmath98 requires @xmath288 which renders @xmath247 real for @xmath280 . on the other hand , compatibility with the type 0 theories at @xmath100 requires @xmath289 which renders @xmath247 real for @xmath277 . * we will later provide evidence in favor of @xmath247 existing for @xmath290 . * in general , for the type 0 choices ( [ tn ] ) for @xmath271 , @xmath247 remains real for @xmath101 when @xmath291 mod @xmath287 and becomes complex when @xmath113 mod @xmath287 . * in the special case @xmath98 , @xmath247 can be made real by setting @xmath278 . * @xmath292 contains powers of @xmath15 consistent with those of a parameter counting branes . this is true only for @xmath278 . * @xmath292 contains powers of @xmath174 consistent with those of a parameter counting branes . this is true only for @xmath57 . * as for @xmath249 , we notice that associating one boundary to each factor of @xmath174 _ and _ @xmath15 also produces a consistent worldsheet expansion . we might speculate that , in general , these expansions might capture @xmath174 and @xmath15 simultaneously counting branes . * these expansions do not exist for @xmath293 . * with @xmath192 and @xmath294 this class reduces to the @xmath102 brane expansion in @xmath174 seen for the 0b theory at @xmath100 in equation ( [ 0bexpnsm=4 ] ) . ( recall that there @xmath295 . ) * these are the non trivial broken symmetry solutions obtained in the 0b theory as one increases @xmath84 . we reviewed this at the end of section [ sec:0b ] . * as @xmath84 increases , further expansions in this class arise for every odd @xmath84 , which we generically label @xmath296 . these are distinguished by the different values of @xmath297 in ( [ classes ] ) , but since their behavior is identical for our purposes we often group them together . * for odd @xmath84 , reality imposes no restrictions on the direction of @xmath296 . * for @xmath100 , reality requires that we fix @xmath292 to be an @xmath298 expansion . for the subsequent even @xmath84 , some of the @xmath296 are real for @xmath299 , while the remaining are real for @xmath300 . we can extrapolate the pattern observed for the first few @xmath84 and make predictions for the structures that should appear at higher @xmath84 . the first observation is that there are @xmath237 expansions in all ( taking into account the various expansions related by symmetries in each class ) at each @xmath84 . the counting can be broken down as follows . .the number and types of expansion classes for @xmath50 , as a solution to the string equations ( [ dwwstring1 ] ) and ( [ dwwstring2 ] ) , with increasing @xmath84 from 1 to 8 . see text for further discussion . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^,^,>",options="header " , ] as table 1 indicates , we have multiplied the torus terms by unknown normalizations @xmath301 , @xmath302 and @xmath303 , which we will later attempt to fix . notice that we have distinguished two possibilities for @xmath304 : @xmath305 and @xmath306 , to match the @xmath307 choices . we now construct the three possible @xmath308 from these torus terms . the known theories : 0a and 0b @xmath309 \quad \ \quad ( x > 0 ) \nonumber\\ z^{(\rm 0a , 0b)}_{\rm even } & = & \frac{1}{2}\left[a c^2 + \left(\frac{n+3}{2n}\right)b\gamma^{2}\right]\;\;\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \quad\quad\quad ( x < 0)\end{aligned}\ ] ] 2 . the unknown theories : @xmath310 and @xmath311 @xmath312 \quad \quad ( x > 0 ) \nonumber\\ z^{(\rm \widetilde{a } , \widetilde{b})}_{\rm even } & = & \frac{1}{2}\left[\left(\frac{n-1}{2n}\right)\tilde{a}c^2 - \tilde{b}\gamma^2\right ] \quad\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad\qquad \qquad\quad ( x < 0)\end{aligned}\ ] ] 3 . the unknown theories : @xmath313 and @xmath314 @xmath315 \quad , \quad ( x > 0 ) \nonumber\\ z^{(\rm \widehat{a } , \widehat{b})}_{\rm even } & = & \frac{1}{2}\left[\hat{a}\left(\frac{n+1}{12n}\right ) - \frac{1}{n}\hat{a}c^2 - \hat{b}\gamma^2\right ] \qquad \qquad\qquad \qquad\quad \quad\quad ( x < 0)\end{aligned}\ ] ] we will now see what conditions are required to deduce the special parameter values , @xmath274 and @xmath192 , for type 0a and 0b respectively . we begin by observing that the continuum partition functions listed in section [ continuum ] are independent of the sign of @xmath125 . therefore , we will impose this as a constraint on every @xmath316 that we construct , @xmath317 we impose this condition by equating the two expressions in equation ( [ zevenknown ] ) . interestingly , the @xmath84dependence factorizes completely leading to @xmath318 while it is indeed possible for @xmath174 and @xmath15 to inherit @xmath84 dependence from dependence on @xmath87 , the simplest possibility is that these parameters are independent of @xmath84 . that the @xmath84 dependence factors out of equation ( [ relncgammaaa ] ) allows this simplicity to be realized . this suggests that we also impose @xmath319 substituting ( [ relncgammaaa ] ) back into ( [ zevenknown ] ) we obtain , @xmath320 finally , we impose one more condition , @xmath321 which , together with condition 2 , forces us to conclude @xmath322 condition 3 is motivated by the remarkable fact that @xmath323 _ is _ independent of @xmath84 , which is nontrivial given the form of equation ( [ pfnaamins2 ] ) , and also by the observation that this constraint correctly produces the required parameter values in this case . this is as far as we can go without some extra information . fortunately , for the type 0 theories , we actually know @xmath324 and @xmath325 : the factor of half is because of the doubling of the free energy the 0b theory relative to the 0a theory and the negative sign is because it is @xmath326 which defines the two point function for these theories . ( recall the observation at the end of section ( [ sec:0breduc ] ) ) . thus we see that we obtain the correct parameter values @xmath327 and @xmath57 for the theories under consideration . moreover , we correctly obtain the known value to be the @xmath112 contribution to the 0b theory leading us to @xmath328 . this means that the @xmath112 contribution to the 0b theory is actually zero . while @xmath249 is real as a @xmath112 expansion for @xmath329 , it is complex for @xmath330 . the resolution is that the zero contribution is to be understood as coming from the _ trivial _ @xmath331 solution of the 0b theory obtained by setting @xmath332 in the 0b string equations . it is interesting that our procedure using @xmath249 should give parameter values that are consistent with the _ trivial _ solution . ] of @xmath333 . next , we turn to exploring where our new conditions take us in investigating the unknown corners . using equation ( [ zevenunknown2 ] ) , we see that condition 1 gives , @xmath335 conditions 2 and 3 give , @xmath336 and so result means that the contribution to the torus terms coming from @xmath249 is zero . in a sense , this result is the analog of what was seen for the type 0b theories . our argument again is that the torus term for @xmath102 at the @xmath337 corner comes from the trivial @xmath338 solution , analogous to the 0b case . ] we have @xmath339 remarkably enough , everything seems to work as before , except now we obtain new values for our parameters and a new expression for @xmath340 . we have yet to make an numerical prediction for @xmath340 as we still must fix the normalizations . we will return to this point in next section [ sec : new - theories ] . condition 1 gives : @xmath342 conditions 2 and 3 imply , @xmath343 this result is not as encouraging . @xmath316 does not depend on @xmath344 which implies that it does not depend on theory @xmath345 at all . we find this unacceptable and therefore conclude that conditions 2 and 3 are incompatible constraints in this case . we nevertheless take seriously the possibility that theories like this may exist , but with @xmath84dependent parameters and an @xmath84dependent @xmath316 . we will briefly consider this possibility in section ( [ sec : ndep ] ) . in the above we have explored the crucial and quite constraining assumption that @xmath316 is independent of the index @xmath346 . theories @xmath347 and @xmath348 seemed particularly suited to produce such a @xmath316 . in an effort to better understand what these theories may be , we next ask which continuum theories are capable of producing an @xmath84independent @xmath340 . looking at the various partition functions listed in section [ continuum ] , it is easy to see that only the following choices give rise to an @xmath84independent partition function : + 1 . @xmath349 in equation ( [ pfnaamins2 ] ) with @xmath350 and @xmath351 . and @xmath78 labeling the super minimal models must obey : @xmath352 ; @xmath353 ; if both are odd , they are coprime and if both are even , then @xmath354 and @xmath355 must be coprime . there is also a standard restriction that if @xmath356 and @xmath78 are even , then @xmath357 must be odd . it follows that if @xmath350 then @xmath351 . ] these theories are type 0 string theories coupled to the @xmath10 @xmath1 models and are already described at the known corners . @xmath358 in equation ( [ pfnsadmins1 ] ) with @xmath359 and @xmath360 .. the choice @xmath361 would suggest that the @xmath362 @xmath2 model exists at at @xmath70 ; however , all combinations of real expansions at @xmath70 have been exhausted in describing the type 0 @xmath1 @xmath363 model . we therefore expect the @xmath362 model to appear at @xmath364 where more combinations of expansions exist since @xmath247 is real . thus we choose @xmath365 with @xmath366 . ] these theories are the type 0 strings theories coupled to the @xmath367 @xmath2 models with @xmath368 . @xmath369 in equation ( [ pfnaaminstypeii2 ] ) with @xmath350 and @xmath351 . these are the type ii strings coupled to the @xmath10 @xmath1 models with @xmath370 . @xmath371 in equation ( [ pfnsadminstypeii2 ] ) with @xmath350 and @xmath351 . these are the type ii strings coupled to the @xmath10 @xmath2 models with @xmath370 . this is the same partition function as case @xmath372 above . @xmath371 in equation ( [ pfnsadminstypeii1 ] ) with @xmath359 and @xmath373 . these theories are the type ii string theories coupled to the @xmath374 @xmath2 models with @xmath375 . + we seek to identify @xmath376 with one of the above partition functions , but to do so we will need some way of determining @xmath377 and @xmath378 . we consider the possibility that the theories @xmath379 and @xmath380 are type iia and type iib string theories , respectively . as we will see , this will uniquely fix the normalizations and allow us to identify the resulting @xmath381 as that of case ( 5 ) above , _ i.e. _ type ii string theories coupled to the @xmath374 @xmath2 models . pursuing the apparent similarity with the moduli space of @xmath382 theories@xcite a little further , ( recall our discussion in section [ sec : square ] , and figure [ fig3 ] ) we can study the partition functions of those theories ( compactified on a circle ) to get clues as to the possible relative normalizations . we list them here@xcite : @xmath383 an important clue is to be found in the @xmath384 behaviour of each theory . this is the physics of the field theory sector ( kaluza klein states ) that propagate on the circle , and the relative normalizations are of interest to us . type 0b has twice as much energy in this sector as type 0a , and type iia has double that of type iib . now , as expected , the type 0 theories exchange under the t duality operation @xmath385 , as do the type ii theories . duality vertically should take the type ii theories to the type 0 theories , but this needs to be done on a circle twisted by @xmath386 . the partition functions for iia / b on such a circle is : @xmath387 notice that the field theory term of type iia is now actually half that of type iib . now we can compare the overall type ii normalization to the type 0 by doing the vertical t duality . under @xmath385 we see that type iib field theory term matches that of the type 0a theory , while for type iia , the field theory term is 1/4 that of the type 0b value . in summary , we see that comparing squares would suggest that @xmath388 and @xmath389 , and the chain of relationships above gives the relative normalization of 0b and 0a as 2 to 1 , while that of ( twisted ) iib and iia is 2 to 1 , so @xmath390 . finally , t duality ( with a twist ) between 0a and iib gives them the same relative normalization , implying , @xmath391 in this case we get therefore that for our putative type ii theories , @xmath392 which is equal to that of the type 0 case , but with an opposite sign . this is the same as the partition function ( [ pfnsadminstypeii1 ] ) for the type ii theories coupled to the @xmath374 @xmath2 super minimal models . interestingly , equation ( [ gammaad ] ) implies that @xmath393 for iib and @xmath278 for iia , which nicely mirrors the values @xmath394 for 0a and @xmath57 for 0b . further work is required to strengthen our conjecture that we have here the type iia and iib theories coupled to the superconformal minimal models . as stated , an explicit definition of @xmath0 type ii strings ( separately for types a and b , and not just our suggestion for @xmath316 given in section [ sec : type - ii - z - even ] ) does not yet seem to exist in the literature , and our attempts to directly define them so far are incomplete . note that we have assumed that the relative normalizations of the partition functions that follow from @xmath382 really descend to the @xmath0 case , and while reasonable , this needs to be proven . the explicit @xmath25 dependence of the individual partition functions that we get by taking the dww one loop expressions seriously have a ( so far ) unilluminating form at positive @xmath125 that we have not been able to check against a continuum computation . on the other hand the negative @xmath125 result neatly mirrors the type 0 case . we list the results here , and leave this line of investigation for the future and @xmath395 theories are again type 0a and type 0b string theories , respectively , perhaps coupled to an @xmath2 modular invariant . this would again fix the relative normalization of the partition functions such that @xmath396 and @xmath397 , yielding @xmath398 , which unfortunately differs from the continuum partition function for the @xmath367 @xmath2 super minimal models by a sign . to match , we would have to assume that @xmath399 encodes the partition function instead of @xmath326 , which contradicts our earlier establishment of the @xmath1 type 0 points . ] : @xmath400 this should be compared with the type 0 cases displayed in equation ( [ pfns0a0b ] ) . our main successes so far have involved theories in which @xmath340 and the values for @xmath15 and @xmath174 have been independent of @xmath84 . while these are the simplest possibilities , there is little reason to suspect that these theories are the only types amenable to description by dww . we observed in section [ sec : unknown - tilde ] that there might be new theories , _ e.g. , _ the ones we called @xmath401 and @xmath402 , whose description will most likely require such @xmath84dependence for @xmath403 . unfortunately , the availability of continuum calculations to compare to is limited , so obtaining convincing evidence for any particular proposal is difficult . nevertheless , there is much more evidence to accumulate from the differential equations themselves . we hope to report upon this issue in later work . we briefly mention one way that @xmath84dependence might emerge naturally . the @xmath316 that we have constructed from the torus terms of our perturbation expansions depend on three variables : @xmath84 , @xmath174 , and @xmath15 . we must however impose sign independence which reduces the total number of independent variables describing @xmath340 to two . in special cases the algebra conspires and we find that @xmath316 actually depends on no variables at all . this behavior is to be compared to @xmath316 as computed from the continuum partition functions . for generic @xmath356 and @xmath78 , @xmath316 is a function of two variables , but in special cases this dependence completely vanishes . this motivates us to attempt to express for @xmath84 , @xmath174 , and @xmath15 as functions of @xmath356 and @xmath78 . equation ( [ z0a0b ] ) indicates that @xmath404 is inversely proportional to @xmath84 . the form of equation ( [ pfnaamins2 ] ) then suggests that we take @xmath405 . since @xmath406 in this case , we can predict @xmath407 now equating @xmath404 of equation ( [ z0a0b ] ) with the quantity in equation ( [ pfnaamins2 ] ) and using the relation @xmath408 , which follows from sign independence , gives @xmath409 note that the models already studied had @xmath350 which gave us @xmath57 . we can perform the same exercise for @xmath410 which we have argued describes type ii strings coupled to @xmath2 @xmath374 models . again we have @xmath411 , which holds for @xmath359 and @xmath412 . equating @xmath413 of equation ( [ relncgammaad ] ) with the quantity in equation ( [ pfnsadminstypeii1 ] ) and using @xmath414 gives , @xmath415 for the models we ve previously considered , @xmath359 , so we correctly reduce to the condition @xmath278 . note here that we would run into problems if we considered @xmath416 because then @xmath174 would become imaginary . as discussed at length in the introduction , we find very significant this rich framework into which we can embed so many string theories and discover how they intertwine with each other . we suspect that there may be many more theories to be found in this framework , and that we have only just begun to learn how to extract and identify the various theories using the limited comparisons we can do to existing continuum computations . we have been able to gather evidence for a square of connected theories , firmly establishing the top corners as type 0a and 0b theories coupled to the @xmath1 modular invariant @xmath10 minimal models , and finding several strong pieces of evidence that the special points at the bottom are string theories , the ( non supersymmetric@xcite ) type iia and iib theories coupled to the @xmath2 modular invariant @xmath374 minimal models . see figure [ square2 ] . notice that the @xmath249 side of the square is generically understood as defining the theory when the number background branes , _ i.e. , _ @xmath174 or @xmath15 , is set to zero . this is the case for type 0b ( already established in ref . @xcite ) and is inherited by the type iia theory as well . away from @xmath278 @xmath249 is complex for @xmath25 even , and one of the symmetry breaking @xmath417 may supply the @xmath102 physics instead . ( for @xmath25 odd , @xmath249 is real for @xmath418 and so may well furnish the @xmath102 physics in those cases . ) it is also important to note that for @xmath25 odd , @xmath247 is no longer real ( with the exception of @xmath278 at @xmath70 ) . this suggests that this regime of perturbation theory at @xmath101 ( containing fluxes for type iia and branes for type iib ) is ill defined at those values of @xmath25 , even while the opposite regime at @xmath102 exists . this may suggest non perturbative instabilities for those values of @xmath25 . an instructive prototype of this possibility is the original bosonic family of string theories defined non perturbatively in terms of a painlev i hierarchy of string equations@xcite . at large @xmath125 , the leading behaviour for the two point function was @xmath419 for the @xmath25th model , and for positive @xmath125 the physics was the @xmath161 conformal minimal models coupled to liouville theory . for even @xmath25 , the the @xmath102 regime gives complex values , signalling the non perturbative problems . something analogous may be going on here for odd @xmath25 ( except @xmath70 , @xmath278 ) for the type ii @xmath2 @xmath374 models . we will report further non perturbative aspects in a follow up paper where we discuss numerical and analytic studies of solutions that connect different perturbative regimes@xcite . + there are many more interesting issues to understand . while we compared to our proposal for a continuum definition of the even sector partition function of the type ii theories , a direct continuum definition of the type iia and iib string theories would be valuable to have , in order to provide another check on our conjecture for the new points . whether or not they are type ii string theories , it is clear that these new theories are of interest , and may ( as already stated ) be only the first in a very large family of new theories that our string equations define . they are all nicely interconnected with the known type 0 theories , and have a rich non perturbative sector . we will explore much of this non perturbative physics in a follow up paper@xcite . we have seen several signs that the organizing square is inherited from the organizing square of theories seen at @xmath382 in ref.@xcite . we suspect this inheritance arises physically by rg flow , and it would be of value to explore this further ( there are bosonic investigations in the literature@xcite ) . in particular , the special points with @xmath420 , where our partition functions vanish ( also suggested by the underlying painlev iv structures we saw in section [ sec : painleve ] , which are also worth understanding better ) , may well be related to the supersymmetric points identified in ref.@xcite . in summary , we have found a rich laboratory of solvable string theory models with several non perturbative connections between them by realizing them as special points of a larger physical system , the theory of dispersive water waves . in some respects it is an analogue of what we would like to see in studies of m theory . it will be interesting to learn whether the larger framework of dispersive water waves can yield any new insights about the non perturbative nature of string theories and related theories . this work was supported by the us department of energy . ri thanks tameem albash , nikolay bobev , arnab kundu , hubert saleur , and nicholas warner for useful conversations . cvj thanks the aspen center for physics for hospitality while some of this work was carried out . c. m. hull and p. k. townsend , `` unity of superstring dualities , '' _ nucl . * b438 * ( 1995 ) 109137 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9410167[hep-th/9410167 ] . p. k. townsend , `` the eleven - dimensional supermembrane revisited , '' _ phys . * b350 * ( 1995 ) 184187 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9501068[hep-th/9501068 ] . e. witten , `` string theory dynamics in various dimensions , '' _ nucl . * b443 * ( 1995 ) 85126 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9503124[hep-th/9503124 ] . r. iyer , c. v. johnson , and j. s. pennington , `` non perturbative string theory from water waves ( working title ) , '' _ _ to appear , _ _ ( 2010 ) . d. j. gross and a. a. migdal , `` nonperturbative two - dimensional quantum gravity , '' _ phys . * 64 * ( 1990 ) 127 . e. brezin and v. a. kazakov , `` exactly solvable field theories of closed strings , '' _ phys . _ * b236 * ( 1990 ) 144150 . m. r. douglas and s. h. shenker , `` strings in less than one - dimension , '' _ nucl . * b335 * ( 1990 ) 635 . t. r. morris , `` 2-d quantum gravity , multicritical matter and complex matrices , '' . fermilab - pub-90 - 136-t . s. dalley , c. v. johnson , and t. r. morris , `` multicritical complex matrix models and nonperturbative 2- d quantum gravity , '' _ nucl . * b368 * ( 1992 ) 625654 . s. dalley , c. v. johnson , and t. r. morris , `` nonperturbative two - dimensional quantum gravity , '' _ nucl . phys . _ * b368 * ( 1992 ) 655670 . c. v. johnson , t. r. morris , and a. watterstam , `` global kdv flows and stable 2-d quantum gravity , '' _ phys . _ * b291 * ( 1992 ) 1118 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9205056[hep-th/9205056 ] . s. dalley , c. v. johnson , t. r. morris , and a. watterstam , `` unitary matrix models and 2-d quantum gravity , '' _ mod . lett . _ * a7 * ( 1992 ) 27532762 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206060[hep-th/9206060 ] . c. crnkovic , m. r. douglas , and g. w. moore , `` physical solutions for unitary matrix models , '' _ nucl . * b360 * ( 1991 ) 507523 . t. j. hollowood , l. miramontes , a. pasquinucci , and c. nappi , `` hermitian vs. anti - hermitian 1-matrix models and their hierarchies , '' _ nucl . * b373 * ( 1992 ) 247280 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9109046[hep-th/9109046 ] . i. r. klebanov , j. m. maldacena , and n. seiberg , `` unitary and complex matrix models as 1-d type 0 strings , '' _ commun . * 252 * ( 2004 ) 275323 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0309168[hep-th/0309168 ] . m. noumi , `` painlev equations through symmetry , '' _ american mathematical society ( translations of mathematical monographs , volume 223 ) . _ ( 2004 ) . n. seiberg , `` observations on the moduli space of two dimensional string theory , '' _ jhep _ * 03 * ( 2005 ) 010 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0502156[hep-th/0502156 ] . d. j. gross and i. r. klebanov , `` one - dimensional string theory on a circle , '' _ nucl . phys . _ * b344 * ( 1990 ) 475498 . e. hsu and d. kutasov , `` the gravitational sine - gordon model , '' _ nucl . * b396 * ( 1993 ) 693707 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9212023[hep-th/9212023 ] . j. e. carlisle , c. v. johnson , and j. s. pennington , `` baecklund transformations , d - branes , and fluxes in minimal type 0 strings , '' _ j. phys . _ * a40 * ( 2007 ) 1245112462 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0501006[hep-th/0501006 ] . j. e. carlisle , c. v. johnson , and j. s. pennington , `` d - branes and fluxes in supersymmetric quantum mechanics , '' http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0511002[hep-th/0511002 ] . i. m. gelfand and l. a. dikii , `` asymptotic behavior of the resolvent of sturm - liouville equations and the algebra of the korteweg - de vries equations , '' _ russ . math . surveys _ * 30 * ( 1975 ) 77113 . m. r. douglas , `` strings in less than one dimension and the generalized kdv hierarchies , '' _ phys . _ * b238 * ( 1990 ) 176 . t. banks , m. r. douglas , n. seiberg , and s. h. shenker , `` microscopic and macroscopic loops in non - perturbative two- dimensional gravity , '' _ phys . lett . _ * b238 * ( 1990 ) 279 . a. b. zamolodchikov and a. b. zamolodchikov , `` liouville field theory on a pseudosphere , '' http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0101152[hep-th/0101152 ] . v. fateev , a. b. zamolodchikov , and a. b. zamolodchikov , `` boundary liouville field theory . i : boundary state and boundary two - point function , '' http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0001012[hep-th/0001012 ] . j. teschner , `` remarks on liouville theory with boundary , '' http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0009138[hep-th/0009138 ] . v. periwal and d. shevitz , `` unitary matrix models as exactly solvable string theories , '' _ phys . rev * 64 * ( 1990 ) 1326 . v. periwal and d. shevitz , `` exactly solvable unitary matrix models : potentials and correlations , '' _ nucl . _ * b344 * ( 1990 ) 731746 . h. airault , `` rational solutions of painlevequations , '' _ stud . _ * 61 * ( 1979 ) 3153 . v. e. zakharov and a. b. shabat , `` integration of nonlinear equations of mathematical physics by the method of inverse scattering . ii , '' _ funct . * 13 * ( 1979 ) 166174 . t. r. morris , `` multicritical matter from complex matrices , '' _ class grav . _ * 9 * ( 1992 ) 18731881 . b. kuperschmidt , `` mathematics of dispersive water waves , '' _ comm . * 99 * ( 1985 ) 5173 . c. v. johnson , `` string theory without branes , '' http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610223[hep-th/0610223 ] . d. kutasov and n. seiberg , `` noncritical superstrings , '' _ phys . * b251 * ( 1990 ) 6772 . h. ginsparg and g. w. moore , `` lectures on 2-d gravity and 2-d string theory , '' http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9304011[hep-th/9304011 ] . p. di francesco , p. h. ginsparg , and j. zinn - justin , `` 2-d gravity and random matrices , '' _ phys . * 254 * ( 1995 ) 1133 , http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9306153[hep-th/9306153 ] . p. di francesco , h. saleur , and j. b. zuber , `` generalized coulomb gas formalism for two - dimensional critical models based on su(2 ) coset construction , '' _ nucl . phys . _ * b300 * ( 1988 ) 393 . a. cappelli , `` modular invariant partition functions of superconformal theories , '' _ phys . _ * b185 * ( 1987 ) 8288 . m. bershadsky and i. r. klebanov , `` partition functions and physical states in two - dimensional quantum gravity and supergravity , '' _ nucl . * b360 * ( 1991 ) 559585 . Abstract:
[ "we uncover a remarkable role that an infinite hierarchy of non linear differential equations plays in organizing and connecting certain @xmath0 string theories non perturbatively . we are able to embed the type 0a and 0b @xmath1 minimal string theories into this single framework . the string theories arise as special limits of a rich system of equations underpinned by an integrable system known as the dispersive water wave hierarchy . we observe that there are several other string like limits of the system , and conjecture that some of them are type iia and iib @xmath2 minimal string backgrounds . we explain how these and several string like special points arise and are connected . in some cases , the framework endows the theories with a non perturbative definition for the first time . notably , we discover that the painlev iv equation plays a key role in organizing the string theory physics , joining its siblings , painlev i and ii , whose roles have previously been identified in this minimal string context . * string theory and water waves * * ramakrishnan iyer@xmath3 , clifford v. johnson@xmath4 , jeffrey s. pennington@xmath5 * _ @xmath6department of physics and astronomy _ _ university of southern california _ _ los angeles , ca 90089 - 0484 , u.s.a . _ _ @xmath5slac national accelerator laboratory _ _ stanford university _ _ stanford , ca 94309 , u.s.a . _ @xmath3ramaiyer , @xmath4johnson1 , [ at ] usc.edu ; @xmath5jpennin [ at ] stanford.edu" ]
13,605
13,605
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: it is by now well established that baryonic matter represents only about @xmath1 of the total matter density of the universe ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , while the majority is in the form of non - baryonic dark matter ( dm ) . since galaxies form through the accretion of baryonic material onto dynamically dominant dm structures ( halos ) , it would be reasonable to assume that the baryon mass fraction of present day galaxies approximately equals the cosmic value ( @xmath2 ) . despite this expectation , observations point to the fact that galaxies are not able to retain their cosmic `` fair share '' of baryons , and that the resulting baryon deficit depends strongly on the mass of their host halo . the first line of evidence is provided by observational estimates of the abundance of galaxies as a function of their total stellar mass , a distribution referred to as the galactic stellar mass function ( smf ) . thanks to the advent of wide area optical surveys with multiband photometric and spectroscopic information , such as the two degree field galaxy redshift survey ( 2dfgrs ) and the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) , the smf has been measured over the mass range @xmath3 , using statistical samples of tens of thousands of galaxies and a variety of stellar mass estimation techniques ( @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , to name a few ) . the smf displays an exponential cutoff at masses @xmath4 and an approximate power - law behavior at low masses ( @xmath5 ) , with a `` shallow '' exponent of @xmath6 . on the other hand , the halo mass function ( hmf ) predicted in the lambda cold dark matter ( @xmath0cdm ) model , follows a much `` steeper '' power - law ( @xmath7 ) over the mass range of interest . this observation alone excludes the possibility that the stellar mass of a galaxy is simply a fixed fraction of the host halo mass . one can furthermore statistically derive an average relation between the stellar mass of a galaxy ( @xmath8 ) and the mass of its host halo ( @xmath9 ) , through the technique of abundance matching ( see [ sec : am ] for details ) . @xmath8 - @xmath9 relations based on abundance matching ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) have shown that the `` stellar conversion efficiency '' , @xmath10 , never exceeds 25 - 30% . furthermore , @xmath11 peaks for milky way - sized galaxies ( @xmath12 ) , and declines rapidly on either side of the peak ( e.g. figure 2 in @xcite ) . the second line of evidence comes from direct halo mass measurements , obtained through weak lensing or kinematics studies ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? for example , @xcite used stacked weak lensing measurements to estimate the average host halo mass of galaxies in different stellar mass bins , and found that @xmath11 never exceeds @xmath13% . direct halo mass measurements can circumvent a number of assumptions inherent in the application of abundance matching , but such techniques can presently only be applied to a restricted range of stellar mass ( @xmath14 ) , and are affected by their own set of systematics . stellar mass is not always the dominant baryonic component in a galaxy . in fact , the hi to stellar mass ratio ( `` hi fraction '' ; @xmath15 ) tends to increase with decreasing stellar mass , and hi often dominates the baryonic content of low - mass galaxies . the transition from stellar - mass dominated to hi dominated systems takes place at @xmath16 for hi - selected samples ( e.g. * ? ? ? * see also fig . [ fig : gsmr ] in this work ) , or at @xmath17 for optically - selected samples ( e.g. * ? ? ? as a result , it is presently not clear what is the behavior of the `` baryon retention fraction '' @xmath18 in low - mass galaxies , when both stars and cold gas are taken into account . in particular it is not well understood whether the very low average value of @xmath11 inferred for low - mass halos is a result of poor retention of baryonic material , of the low efficiency of gas - to - stars conversion , or of a combination of both . for example , @xcite argue that the increasing gas fraction in low - mass galaxies should approximately offset the decreasing stellar - to - halo mass ratio , and result in a roughly constant @xmath19% . this conclusion was based on an indirect estimate of the cold gas content of galaxies , based on the average @xmath20 relation observed in a set of samples in the literature . an early work by @xcite , based on the same indirect method , also reached a qualitatively similar conclusion . @xcite found an approximately constant @xmath21 at the low - mass end using a different indirect method , which involves the comparison of the stellar and hi mass distributions of two different galaxy samples . these results would imply that low - mass galaxies are relatively efficient at retaining baryonic mass , but very inefficient in converting their gas into stars . this conclusion , however , would require a `` steep '' hi mass function ( himf ) in the local universe , in contrast to what is measured @xcite . moreover , the recent work of @xcite , also based on using the average @xmath20 relations for blue and red galaxies separately , found no signs for a flat @xmath21 at low masses . in this article we _ directly _ measure the abundance of galaxies as a function of their `` baryonic mass '' ( throughout this article the term baryonic refers to the combined stellar and atomic gas components of galaxies , and baryonic mass is calculated as @xmath22 , where the 1.4 factor accounts for the presence of helium ) . we use optical data from the seventh data release of the sdss ( sdss dr7 ) to estimate stellar masses , and hi - line flux measurements from the arecibo legacy fast alfa ( alfalfa ) survey to measure atomic gas masses . the resulting distribution , referred to hereafter as the baryon mass function ( bmf ) of galaxies , can be used in abundance matching to derive a robust @xmath21 - @xmath9 relation . in order to investigate sample selection effects , we employ both an hi - selected and an optically - selected sample drawn from the _ same _ volume to derive the mass distributions for the stellar , atomic hydrogen and baryonic components . the paper is organized as follows : in section [ sec : data ] , we introduce the datasets used to measure the stellar , hi and baryon mass distributions . we describe the methodology used to measure atomic hydrogen masses and we estimate stellar masses for our galaxy samples . in section [ sec : bmf ] , we present our measurements of the smf , himf & bmf from both the hi - selected and the optically - selected samples , and compare them against one another as well as against other published results . in section [ sec : biases ] we consider the impact of possible systematics on our measurements , such as stellar mass estimation method , distance uncertainties and the exclusion of some baryonic components ( e.g. molecular gas ) in the calculation of the bmf . in section [ sec : bar_frac ] , we present the @xmath11 - @xmath9 and @xmath21 - @xmath9 relation in a @xmath0cdm universe . in section [ sec : conclusion ] , we discuss the implications of the result and summarize our main conclusions . throughout this paper , we use a hubble constant of @xmath23 . we select galaxies from the current data release of the alfalfa survey , which covers 40% of the planned final survey area ( `` @xmath24.40 '' catalog ; @xcite ) . we restrict ourselves to two rectangular areas of the `` spring '' coverage of @xmath24.40 ( @xmath25 , @xmath26 & @xmath27 ) , which encompass the virgo cluster as well as the supergalactic plane at low velocities . we restrict ourselves to galaxies with @xmath28 15000 km s@xmath29 ( @xmath30 ) , in order to avoid the strong radio frequency interference ( rfi ) present at frequencies that correspond to @xmath31 km s@xmath29 . we discard the nearest extragalactic sources with @xmath32 mpc , because they can carry extreme fractional uncertainties on their distances ( see [ sec : derived ] for details on the distance assignment method ) . we furthermore select only hi sources designated as `` code 1 '' in @xmath24.40 , i.e. extragalactic sources detected at high significance ( @xmath33 ) . in addition , we exclude sources with integrated fluxes below the 50% completeness limit of the alfalfa survey ( see @xcite , section 6 for the derivation of the alfalfa completeness limits ) . the above requirements are satisfied by 7618 galaxies . we remove from our sample 204 @xmath24.40 sources which are not crossmatched with an optical source in sdss , as well as 208 additional sources which have been flagged as having problematic sdss photometry ( crossmatch code `` p '' in @xmath24.40 , for details see section 4 in @xcite ) . this quality cut on the sdss photometry introduces some bias against faint , low surface brightness galaxies of irregular morphology ; such sources are often `` shredded '' ( i.e. assigned multiple photometric objects ) by the sdss magnitude extraction process , and are usually assigned a `` p '' ( `` photometry suspect '' ) crossmatch code in @xmath24.40 . lastly , 11 additional objects were discarded , in cases where the stellar mass computation method described in [ sec : derived ] failed to produce physically plausible results . our final sample thus consists of 7195 extragalactic objects , detected over @xmath342000 deg@xmath35 of high galactic latitude sky and out to @xmath36 mpc . the upper panel of figure [ fig : coneplot ] displays the spatial distribution of our hi - selected galaxies , and puts in evidence the complex large scale structure in the survey volume . note that all objects in our hi - selected sample have 21 cm redshifts and line fluxes as well as multi - band optical photometry , and hence estimates of both their stellar and atomic hydrogen masses . we draw an optically - selected sample from the sdss dr7 @xcite spectroscopic database , in the same volume used to define our hi - selected sample . specifically , we select galaxies that lie within the same sky area ( @xmath25 , @xmath26 & @xmath27 ) and satisfy the same velocity and distance restrictions ( @xmath37 15000 km s@xmath29 , @xmath38 mpc ) . cmb velocities for our optically - selected galaxies are calculated based on their sdss spectroscopic redshifts ( @xmath39 ) . we restrict ourselves to objects spectroscopically classified as galaxies in sdss ( ` specclass = 2 ` ) that also have an apparent petrosian magnitude brighter than 17.5 in the @xmath40-band ( @xmath41 ) . this initial cut results in 22707 galaxies . due to their large number , it is not practical to inspect all galaxies individually for the quality of their sdss photometry / spectroscopy . as a result , we expect a fraction of our sources to have issues with their sdss photometry , most often related to `` shredding '' ( i.e. assignment of multiple photometric objects to a single galaxy ) . this issue affects mostly extended sources with structure in their light distribution , such as low surface brightness ( lsb ) galaxies with irregular morphology . in such cases , the sdss magnitude will underestimate the true flux of the galaxy , which in turn will result in an underestimate of its stellar mass . a second issue related to shredding , is that bright star forming knots in the disks of nearby spiral galaxies can sometimes be cataloged as separate spectroscopic objects , and hence interpreted as low - mass satellites of the main spiral . we find that applying a color cut on our sample , @xmath42 , removes a fair fraction of these unwanted cases . on the other hand , cuts based on the quality of the sdss spectrum ( such as cuts on ` zconf ` , ` zstatus ` or ` zwarning ` ) are ineffective , since they exclude mostly legitimate faint or lsb dwarf galaxies with noisy spectra . lastly , we exclude objects for which the stellar mass computation described in [ sec : derived ] failed to produce physically plausible results . our final optically - selected sample consists of 22587 galaxies , occupying the same volume as our hi - selected sample . we crossmatch the optical sample with the full @xmath24.40 catalog ( including code 1 & 2 sources ) , and find 7551 hi source counterparts . the crossmatch rate is thus approximately @xmath43 , as reported in @xcite . note that alfalfa non - detected galaxies are not necessarily hi - poor objects ; due to the low emissivity of atomic hydrogen in the 21 cm line , even moderately gas - rich galaxies in the outer portion of the survey volume can be missed by alfalfa . this point is illustrated by the lower panel of figure [ fig : coneplot ] , which compares the spatial distribution of galaxies in the hi - selected and optically - selected samples . note that all optically - selected galaxies have multiband optical photometry as well as optical redshifts , and hence an estimate of their stellar mass . however , only galaxies crossmatched with an @xmath24.40 source have a 21 cm flux measurement , and hence a value for their atomic hydrogen mass . -band absolute magnitude ( _ panel a _ ) , @xmath44 color ( _ panel b _ ) , stellar mass ( _ panel c _ ) and hi mass ( _ panel d _ ) , for the optically - selected ( _ red solid line _ ) and hi - selected ( _ blue dashed line _ ) samples . as evident in panel _ b _ , the hi - selected sample is strongly biased against the red galaxy population and as a result it is skewed towards lower luminosity and stellar mass systems . conversely , the fractional contribution of bright and massive galaxies ( @xmath45 ) is larger for the optically - selected sample ( panels _ a _ and _ c _ ) . ] we calculate hi masses from the measured 21 cm integrated flux reported in @xmath24.40 . assuming optically thin emission @xmath46 where @xmath47 is the hi mass in units of the solar mass ( @xmath48 ) , @xmath49 is the integrated flux in jy@xmath50km@xmath51s@xmath29 and @xmath52 is the distance in mpc . distances in this article are calculated according to the method used in @xmath24.40 @xcite : nearby galaxies ( @xmath53 km s@xmath29 ) are assigned distances through the use of a peculiar velocity flow model developed by @xcite , while for more distant galaxies simple hubble distances are used ( @xmath54 , with @xmath55 km@xmath51s@xmath29mpc@xmath29 ) . moreover , group and cluster membership information is taken into account when available , as well as primary distance measurements published in the literature . we would like to point out that most of the galaxies in our optically - selected sample are not included in @xmath24.40 , and hence lack the systematic group assignments and primary distance information contained in the catalog . nevertheless , optically - selected galaxies that lie within the sky area and redshift range of the virgo cluster are placed collectively at the virgo distance ( @xmath56 mpc ) , in order to minimize the effects of peculiar motions on the inferred distances of galaxies in the region . we would also like to note that the distance assignment method can have a large impact on the determination of mass functions , especially at the low - mass end . we illustrate this issue in [ sec : dist_unc ] , where we consider the effect on the himf of using uniformly hubble distances for all galaxies . we compute stellar masses for our galaxies based on fitting all 5 sdss photometric bands ( @xmath57 ) , with model spectral energy distributions ( seds ) . the full details of the method can be found in @xcite , but here we summarize the main points : a library of model seds are generated , using the @xcite stellar population synthesis code and assuming a @xcite stellar initial mass function ( imf ) . models with an extensive range of internal extinction , metallicity and star formation histories are considered . in particular , star formation history templates include both an exponentially declining component as well as random starburst episodes . the final physical properties ( e.g. stellar mass , star formation rate , internal extinction etc . ) are computed as the average of all model values , where each model is weighted according to its fit likelihood . in addition to mean values , `` @xmath58 '' uncertainties of the physical properties can also be derived , as one quarter of the 2.5 - 97.5 percentile range of model values . the median @xmath58 uncertainty in @xmath59 is 0.086 dex , or about 22% ( excluding uncertainties on the distance ) . it is important to note that stellar mass estimates of the same galaxy obtained with different methods can have systematic offsets of up to factors of a few . in [ sec : stellar_est ] we address issues related to stellar mass estimation , and consider alternative methods for calculating stellar masses @xcite . figure [ fig : histogram ] compares the distributions of @xmath60-band absolute magnitude ( @xmath61 ) and @xmath44 color ( both corrected for milky way extinction ) , stellar mass ( @xmath8 ) and hi mass ( @xmath47 ) for the hi - selected and optically - selected samples . the most notable difference is in the @xmath44 color distribution , where the hi - selected sample shows a strong bias against the red galaxy population ( see also @xcite ) . as a result , the optically - selected sample contains a larger proportion of high luminosity and stellar mass systems compared to the hi - selected sample . by contrast , the @xmath47 distribution of the two samples is very similar , but remember that only those optically - selected galaxies that are detected in alfalfa are included in the histogram . stellar masses for all galaxies , and hi masses for all alfalfa - detected galaxies are calculated as described in [ sec : derived ] . for the @xmath3415000 galaxies in the optically - selected sample that lack an alfalfa detection , we assign a lower and an upper limit on their atomic hydrogen content ( @xmath62 ) . the lower limit is simply @xmath63 , which corresponds to an hi - devoid galaxy . the upper limit is calculated by assuming that the hi flux of the non - detected galaxy lies just below the alfalfa `` detection limit '' , as defined by the 25% completeness limit of the @xmath24.40 catalog when both code 1 & 2 sources are considered . more precisely @xmath64 where @xmath52 is the galaxy distance in mpc determined by its sdss optical redshift , and @xmath65 is the flux level at which the completeness of the @xmath24.40 catalog falls to 25% , in jy km s@xmath29 . according to eqns . 6 & 7 of @xcite @xmath66 where @xmath67 is the hi - line profile width in km s@xmath29 , measured at the 50% flux level of the profile peak . since alfalfa non - detected galaxies lack a measurement of @xmath67 , we assign a value based on the average @xmath8 @xmath68 relation ( i.e. the stellar mass tully - fisher relation ) of @xmath24.40 galaxies . we then project the @xmath68 value on the line - of - sight according to the sdss @xmath40-band axial ratio , and assuming an intrinsic axial ratio of @xmath69 for all galaxies . baryonic masses ( i.e. stellar mass + atomic gas mass ) for all galaxies are calculated as @xmath22 , where the 1.4 factor is used to account for the cosmic abundance of helium . note that alfalfa non - detected galaxies have two assigned values for their hi mass , and consequently two values for their baryonic mass , @xmath70 and @xmath71 . we calculate cumulative mass functions in logarithmic mass bins for all three components ( i.e. stellar mass , atomic hydrogen mass , baryonic mass ) , separately for the hi - selected and optically - selected samples . since neither sample is volume - limited , mass functions have to take into account the sample selection criteria as well as the large - scale structure in the survey volume . hi selection is based on a combination of galactic hi integrated flux , @xmath49 , and profile width , @xmath67 ( see [ sec : hi_selected ] & discussion in section 6 of @xcite ) ; as a result , galaxies of different hi masses and linewidths are detected out to different distances . similarly , our optically - selected sample is a flux - limited sample , which results in galaxies with different @xmath40-band absolute magnitudes being detected in different volumes . as a result , mass distributions are calculated by summing up the number of detections in a given mass bin ( see fig . [ fig : histogram ] ) , with each detection weighted by an appropriate volume factor . individual weighting factors are calculated via the `` @xmath72 '' method , as implemented in @xcite . this is a non - parametric , maximum - likelihood method , which reduces to the standard @xmath73 method @xcite when applied to a spatially homogeneous galactic sample . the advantage of @xmath72 consists in the fact that it is insensitive to local density fluctuations , and hence mostly immune to structure - induced bias . we refer the interested reader to the literature for the definition , implementation and details of the method . the method definition and basic setup is described in @xcite ; details of the implementation of the method for hi data can be found in @xcite ; the specifics of the application of the method on alfalfa data can be found in @xcite , while a shorter qualitative description can be found in @xcite . lastly , a fraction of galaxies that satisfy all criteria for sdss spectroscopic followup can not be observed for technical reasons ( mostly fiber collisions ) , and are therefore not included in the sdss spectroscopic database . we therefore correct the normalization of all optically - selected distributions by @xmath74 , using the average spectroscopic completeness value reported in @xcite , @xmath75 . similarly , a fraction of the alfalfa volume is `` lost '' due to rfi contamination of certain frequency bands in the alfalfa passband . we correct the normalization of all hi - selected distributions by @xmath76 , where @xmath77 . we would also like to note that , due to the @xmath78 beam size of the alfa receiver , a number of hi sources are expected to be blended . we do not attempt to correct for blending but , given that hi - selected galaxies are a weakly clustered population ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , we anticipate the effect on the hi - selected distributions to be small . ( bmf , _ black symbols _ ) , derived from the hi - selected galaxy sample . error bars represent just the poisson counting error assuming independent errors among different mass bins . ] ( _ black lines _ ) , derived from the optically - selected galaxy sample . the atomic hydrogen and baryonic distributions are represented as allowed ranges , based on estimates of the minimum and maximum hi mass for galaxies that are not detected by alfalfa ( \{@xmath62 } , see [ sec : derived ] for details ) . error bars again represent just the poisson counting error assuming independent errors among different mass bins . ] figure [ fig : mfs_hi ] shows the cumulative distribution of stellar mass ( smf ; _ gold symbols _ ) , hi mass ( himf ; _ cyan symbols _ ) and baryonic mass ( bmf ; _ black symbols _ ) , derived from the hi - selected galaxy sample . the hi - selected bmf follows closely the hi - selected smf at high masses , while at the low - mass end the contribution of the himf becomes dominant ; this is because hi - selected galaxies become more gas - rich as their stellar mass decreases . figure [ fig : mfs_opt ] shows the same distributions ( smf , _ gold line _ ; himf , _ cyan lines _ ; bmf , _ black lines _ ) derived from the optically - selected sample . recall that , in the case of the optically - selected sample , a lower and upper limit of the himf and bmf are shown , since sdss galaxies that are undetected by alfalfa are assigned an upper and lower limit on their hi content , and therefore also on their baryonic mass ( see [ sec : derived ] ) . ) and low - mass ( @xmath79 ) ends . this difference is mostly due to the bias of the hi - selected sample against the red galaxy population ( see [ sec : results ] for a detailed discussion ) . ] for a detailed discussion . ] ) . [ sec : results ] for a detailed discussion . ] in figure [ fig : opt_vs_hi_gsmf ] we compare the smfs derived from the optically - selected and hi - selected samples . the two smfs are consistent at intermediate masses , but the optically - selected smf ( gold line ) is systematically higher at the high - mass and low - mass ends . at high masses the discrepancy is due to the bias of the hi - selected sample against the most massive galaxies , which are usually red passive systems . the discrepancy at the low - mass end is mostly due to the population of red - sequence dwarf galaxies in the nearby virgo cluster that are undetected by alfalfa ; these are mostly dwarfs with early - type morphologies and very low hi content ( see @xcite , for example ) . on the other hand , the hi - selected and optically - selected himfs ( fig . [ fig : opt_vs_hi_himf ] ) are in good agreement with one another , with the hi - selected himf having a slightly steeper low - mass end slope than what suggested by the range of the optically - selected distribution . the two bmfs are mostly in agreement with one another , except at the high - mass end ( a factor of @xmath344 at @xmath80 ) . this is a direct consequence of the discrepancy between the optically - selected and hi - selected stellar mass functions at high masses . note that there is little difference between the two bmfs at low masses , which suggests that the low - mass end of the bmf has been measured robustly . ) . the red diamonds correspond to the @xcite smf in the local universe ( @xmath81 ) , while the purple triangles correspond to the smf of @xcite , extracted over a larger volume ( @xmath82 ) . both the baldry at el . and yang et al . smfs are based on the nyu - vagc galaxy catalog . [ sec : comparison ] for a discussion of the comparison . ] figure [ fig : gsmf_vs_other ] compares the optically - selected smf presented in this work ( same as gold line in fig . [ fig : opt_vs_hi_gsmf ] ) with the local - universe smf of @xcite and the @xcite smf , which are both based on the new york university value - added galaxy catalog ( nyu - vagc ; * ? ? ? there is excellent agreement between the baldry et al . smf and our optically - selected smf , especially at intermediate and low stellar masses ( @xmath83 ) . the deviations at high masses are due to the fact that stellar masses in baldry et al . are calculated differently than in this work ( see sec . 3 of @xcite for details ) ; note that a systematic difference of just 0.1 dex ( 26% ) in stellar mass would be enough to explain the observed difference in abundance at the high - mass end . the @xcite smf is systematically higher than our optically - selected smf at high masses , and displays a more pronounced `` plateau '' at intermediate masses . it is not clear what the cause of the difference at the high - mass end of the distributions is , but it may relate to the fact that the yang et al . smf is extracted from a significantly larger volume than our measurement ( the maximum redshift is @xmath84 for the yang et al . sample and @xmath85 for the sample used in this work ) . moreover , yang et al . use the prescription of @xcite to estimate stellar masses , which is based on the galactic @xmath86 color . as discussed in more detail in [ sec : stellar_est ] , the use of different stellar mass estimators can significantly affect the shape of the measured smf . ) . the solid purple line corresponds to the schechter function fit to the @xcite himf , which is based on the full @xmath24.40 catalog of alfalfa sources and without any optical selection cuts . the green dashed line corresponds to the schechter fit to the @xcite himf , based on 4315 galaxies detected by the hipass survey . [ sec : comparison ] for a discussion of the comparison . ] figure [ fig : himf_vs_other ] compares the hi - selected himf presented in this work ( same as the cyan symbols in fig . [ fig : opt_vs_hi_himf ] ) with the himf of @xcite derived from 10119 galaxies detected by alfalfa over @xmath342600 deg@xmath35 of sky ( purple solid line ) . there is excellent agreement at intermediate and large hi masses ( @xmath87 ) between the @xcite himf and the himf derived in this work , while at lower masses the @xcite himf is slightly steeper than ours . this disagreement may be due to the set of additional optical requirements imposed on our hi - selected sample . as argued in [ sec : hi_selected ] , these requirements are expected to reduce the number of low - mass systems in the sample and therefore decrease the inferred space density at the low - mass end . the dashed green line represents the himf of @xcite based on 4315 sources detected by the hi parkes all - sky survey ( hipass ) over the whole southern celestial hemisphere ( @xmath34 29000 deg@xmath35 ) . there is disagreement between both alfalfa - based himfs and the hipass - based himf of @xcite , at the high - mass end . as argued in @xcite , the higher sensitivity of the alfalfa survey compared to hipass , which enables alfalfa to detect hi - massive systems over a larger volume , should give a statistical advantage to the alfalfa survey in determining the high - mass end of the himf . however , the difference is too large to be explained by counting statistics or cosmic variance ( e.g. according to the estimates of @xcite or @xcite ) . on the other hand , due to the exponential drop - off of the himf at high masses , a flux calibration difference of as low as 0.1 dex could give rise to a similar discrepancy . color and the @xmath60-band luminosity , according to the widely used @xcite calibration . the gold dotted line represents the smf computed using stellar masses derived from the galactic @xmath44 color and the @xmath60-band luminosity , according to the the more recent calibration of @xcite . [ sec : stellar_est ] for a discussion of the comparison . ] a variety of methods exist to estimate stellar masses from spectra or broadband photometric measurements of galaxies ( * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * to name a few ) . most methods rely on comparing the actual galactic emission to the light output of a set of galactic stellar population models . the models that most closely reproduce the observed data are then used to estimate the galactic properties of interest ( e.g. stellar mass , present star formation rate , internal extinction etc . ) ; it is therefore very important to consider model stellar populations which span as large a range of physical parameters as the galaxies in the sample being studied . inferred galactic properties depend not only on the particular type of data employed by each method ( e.g. spectroscopy vs. broadband photometry or optical vs. near - infrared photometry ) , but also by differences in the way in which the model stellar populations are constructed . this means that different methods can yield different estimates of a galactic property even when the _ same _ observational measurements are used . for example , @xcite find that unbiased stellar masses can only be recovered when the true star formation history ( sfh ) of a galaxy is known . in practice however a restricted set of sfhs is considered ( often in the form of a parametrized function ) , which may introduce systematics for galaxies with sfhs that are not well described by the assumed general form . additional complications can be introduced by the different treatment of dust reddening among different models . in general , stellar mass estimates can differ systematically by as much as 0.3 dex , while for individual galaxies the scatter can be as large as 0.6 dex @xcite . bands used in this work ( see [ sec : derived ] ) , and those derived from the galactic @xmath86 color and the @xmath60-band luminosity according to the widely used @xcite calibration . each datapoint corresponds to a galaxy in the optically - selected sample , and the symbol color represents the g - r color of the galaxy . the two stellar mass estimates agree fairly well for red passive galaxies , while for blue star - forming galaxies bell et al . masses are systematically larger by up to a factor of @xmath342 ( see [ sec : stellar_est ] for a detailed discussion ) . ] here we compare the optically - selected smf presented in this work ( computed from stellar masses derived from sed - fitting , see [ sec : derived ] ) with the smf obtained using stellar masses derived from a single galactic color , according to the widely - used @xcite calibration as well as the more recent calibration of @xcite . more specifically , we compute bell et al . masses by multiplying the @xmath60-band luminosity of each galaxy by a mass - to - light ratio inferred from its @xmath86 color . we choose this particular combination of bands because it is relatively immune to contamination of galactic spectra by bright nebular emission lines @xcite . we use a similar procedure to calculate taylor et al . masses , by using their calibration of @xmath60-band mass - to - light ratio versus @xmath44 color . @xcite argue that using @xmath44 colors best constrains the galactic stellar mass estimates . figure [ fig : sed_vs_color ] shows the impact that different methods of estimating stellar mass have on the measurement of the smf . when bell et al . stellar masses are used ( _ gold dashed line _ ) , the smf becomes systematically higher at low and intermediate masses ( @xmath88 ) , while it remains mostly unchanged at the high - mass end . the reason for this pattern becomes evident in fig . [ fig : bell_vs_sed ] , where we see that bell et al . masses agree fairly well with the masses derived in this work for red passive galaxies , but are systematically larger ( by up to a factor of @xmath342 ) for blue star - forming galaxies . @xcite argue that the difference can be primarily attributed to the fact that the stellar population models used for the bell et al . calibration do not consider `` bursty '' star formation histories which are typical of low - mass galaxies with blue colors . this leads to systematically older stellar populations for blue galaxies according to the bell et al . method , which in turn results in systematically higher stellar mass estimates . note that including models with bursty sfhs in a stellar population library does not by itself guarantee a correct estimate of stellar mass ; overestimating the effect of bursts would result in systematically low stellar masses for blue galaxies . conversely , when taylor et al . masses are used ( gold dotted line ) , the smf becomes systematically lower at the high - mass end , while it is mostly unchanged at low and intermediate masses . again , this is a result of the fact that taylor et al . masses agree well with the sed - fitting masses used in this work for blue star - forming galaxies , but are systematically lower ( by up to a factor of @xmath341.4 ) for red passive galaxies . for further discussion ) . ] stellar , hi and baryonic masses are distance - dependent quantities and hence their statistical distributions are affected by distance uncertainties . this is particularly true for the low - mass end of the distributions , which is determined by the properties of nearby galaxies ; neglecting the peculiar velocity of some of these objects can cause fractional distance and mass errors of order @xmath89 , especially in a volume with complex large - scale structure such as the one surveyed by alfalfa ( see fig . [ fig : coneplot ] ) . for this reason , nearby galaxies ( @xmath90 km s@xmath29 ) in the @xmath24.40 catalog are assigned distances based on a parametric peculiar velocity flow model @xcite , and only more distant galaxies ( @xmath91 km s@xmath29 ) are assigned simple hubble distances according to their cmb recessional velocity . the @xcite flow model includes a dipole and a quadrupole component ( local group bulk motion & asymmetric expansion ) and two local attractors ( virgo cluster & great attractor ) , and is calibrated against the sfi++ catalog of galaxies with redshift and independent distance distance information ( from tully - fisher ) . the residuals are then attributed to random thermal motions , which are estimated to have a magnitude of @xmath92 km s@xmath29 . in addition , distances reported in the @xmath24.40 catalog take into account known group and cluster membership as well as primary distance information published in the literature . this latter information is not available for the majority of the galaxies in our optically - selected sample ( which are not included in @xmath24.40 ) , and we only make an attempt to assign all probable virgo members to the virgo cluster distance ( @xmath93 ) . here we re - evaluate the himf for our hi - selected sample using uniformly hubble distances for all galaxies , in order to illustrate the impact of the distance assignment scheme on the derived distributions . figure [ fig : hubble_vs_flow ] shows that the himf computed using hubble distances ( cyan dashed line ) has a much shallower low - mass end slope compared to the himf presented in this work , which uses flow model distances for most nearby galaxies ( cyan solid line ) . this result is in agreement with the work of @xcite , who find that neglecting the local peculiar velocity field when estimating distances to nearby galaxies in the alfalfa volume will lead to a systematically shallower low - mass end slope for the himf . . cyan diamonds represent 14 galaxies of the heracles survey @xcite detected in co line emission . the solid and dotted blue lines represent the average and @xmath94 scatter of the distribution found for 125 co detected galaxies in the cold gass survey @xcite . both samples show that , at least for @xmath95 , molecular gas is almost always a subdominant mass component ( see [ sec : h2 ] for details ) . ] throughout this article we use the term `` baryonic mass '' to refer to the sum of the stellar and atomic gas mass ( @xmath22 ) , a convention that is common in the literature . this definition however excludes a number of baryonic components that are definitely present in galaxies , most notably molecular and ionized -warm or hot- gas . figure [ fig : h2_mass_frac ] displays the fraction of molecular hydrogen ( h@xmath96 ) mass ( accounting for helium ) to `` baryonic mass '' as defined above , as a function of stellar mass . the cyan diamonds represent 14 galaxies from the heracles survey @xcite with h@xmath96 masses measured from interferometric co line observations ( using a fixed @xmath97 conversion factor ) . over the probed stellar mass range ( @xmath98 ) , molecular gas rarely contributes more than 10% of the `` baryonic mass '' . the same conclusion is reached when h@xmath96 mass measurements from the cold gass survey are considered @xcite . the blue solid and dotted lines show the mean and @xmath94 scatter of the relation between the molecular and `` baryonic '' mass components , based on 125 galaxies detected in co emission with the iram 30 m telescope . in this latter case we have estimated the atomic hydrogen mass of galaxies indirectly , using the average @xmath99 vs. @xmath8 relation of the cold gass parent sample @xcite . again , over the stellar mass range probed by the survey ( @xmath100 ) molecular gas is always a subdominant mass component . at lower stellar masses there is large uncertainty on the fractional contribution of h@xmath96 , as it is not precisely known how well the galactic co emission traces molecular hydrogen mass . in particular , the @xmath97 conversion factor may vary by about an order of magnitude as we consider less luminous and more metal poor late - type galaxies ( e.g. * ? ? ? determining the contribution of ionized gas to the total baryonic mass budget of galaxies is much more challenging . for example @xcite argue that warm ionized hydrogen ( hii ) may amount to about 1/3 of the mass of atomic hydrogen ( hi ) in the disk of the milky way . if the ratio of ionized - to - neutral hydrogen mass ( @xmath101 ) were fairly constant among galaxies , then the baryonic mass of a galaxy would be given by the expression @xmath102 . if @xmath103 , then the peak value of the @xmath21 - @xmath9 relation ( see fig . [ fig : am2 ] ) would shift to lower halo mass and the peak value would slightly increase . however , since the precise value and scatter of @xmath101 is not well constrained -and its dependence on galaxy size is not known- we choose not to include the contribution of warm ionized gas in the calculation of @xmath104 . assessing the contribution of the hot ionized medium ( him ) to the total baryonic mass of a galaxy is even more challenging . the coronal him may be the dominant baryonic mass component in galactic halos , especially in massive ellipticals . determining the mass contribution of the him for less massive galaxies however is observationally challenging . in any case , the tightness of the `` baryonic tully - fisher relation '' when computed just from the stellar and hi mass ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) implies that the him never dominates the total baryonic mass budget of late - type galaxies , at least within the extent of the galactic hi disk . let @xmath105 be the cosmic number density of galaxies with baryon mass greater than @xmath104 and let @xmath106 be the cosmic number density of haloes with mass greater than @xmath9 . the fundamental assumption of the abundance matching method ( @xcite ; @xcite ; also see @xcite for a review ) is that @xmath104 is a monotonically increasing function of @xmath9 . with this assumption , @xmath107 can be determined by solving the equation @xmath108 in reality , the baryon content of a halo will depend not only on its mass but also on other parameters , such as its formation history . as a result , a scatter in the distribution of @xmath104 at a given @xmath9 is expected . neglecting the scatter is , nevertheless , justifiable because the aim of abundance matching is precisely to determine the average value of @xmath104 within a halo of mass @xmath9 . we evaluate the right hand side of equation [ eq : am ] , using a halo mass function extracted from one of the cosmological n - body simulations of the horizon project . the simulation was run with a public version of the gadget code @xcite , and uses @xmath109 particles of mass @xmath110 to simulate the formation and evolution of dm structures in a comoving volume of 100 @xmath111 mpc on a side . it assumes a cosmology and initial conditions which are consistent with wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe ( wmap ) third year results @xcite , namely @xmath112 , @xmath113 , @xmath114 , and @xmath115 . the identification of dm haloes and sub - haloes was done with the adaptahop algorithm presented in @xcite . haloes are identified as groups of particles above a threshold over - density of 80 times the mean density of the universe , which corresponds to a mean overdensity contrast of about 200 . the identification of subhaloes within haloes is done using the method described in @xcite . we only keep haloes and sub - haloes with more than 20 particles , i.e. we introduce a minimum halo mass of @xmath116 . - @xmath9 relation . the black solid line shows the @xmath8 - @xmath9 relation obtained by matching the stellar mass function of central galaxies to the mass function of haloes excluding subhaloes . this matching should reproduce the `` true '' relation for central galaxies . the blue dot - dashed line is the relation obtained by matching the total galaxy stellar mass function , including central and satellite galaxies , to the mass function of haloes excluding subhaloes . the red dashed line is the relation obtained by matching the total galaxy stellar mass function with the mass function of haloes including subhaloes . note that , unlike all other figures , this figure uses the stellar mass functions of @xcite , who have separately measured the smf for central and satellite galaxies . ] an important issue for our analysis is determining whether subhaloes should be included or excluded in the calculation of the hmf used in the abundance matching procedure . let @xmath117 be the stellar mass of the central galaxy in a halo of mass @xmath9 and let @xmath118 be the stellar mass of the satellite galaxy in a subhalo of mass @xmath9 . if subhaloes are excluded , then we implicitly assume that all galaxies in our samples are central galaxies , that is , @xmath119 . on the other hand , if subhaloes are included , we implicitly assume that the @xmath104 - @xmath9 relation is the same for both central and satellite galaxies , that is , @xmath120 . in order to understand how much this choice could affect our results , we consider the stellar mass functions of @xcite , for which separate distributions for central and satellite galaxies have been presented . this allows us to calculate the @xmath8 - @xmath9 relation in three ways : firstly , we can match the smf of central galaxies with the halo mass function excluding subhaloes ; this method will give us the correct @xmath8 - @xmath9 for central galaxies , shown by the black solid line in figure [ censat ] . then , we consider the total smf of central plus satellite galaxies and match it with the halo mass function excluding subhaloes . this is equivalent to assuming that all galaxies are central and overestimates the @xmath8 - @xmath9 for central galaxies ( blue dot - dashed line in fig . [ censat ] ) . finally , we can match the total smf of central plus satellite galaxies with the total halo mass function including subhaloes . the result , shown by the red dashed line in figure [ censat ] , lies below the black solid line because it is effectively a weighted average of the relation for the dominant central galaxy population ( the black solid line ) and the relation for the satellite population , which has lower @xmath8 for a given @xmath9 . quantitative comparisons of @xmath118 and @xmath117 have received the attention of much recent literature ( see e.g. cattaneo et al . 2012 , submitted , @xcite , @xcite ) . as we do not distinguish between central and satellite galaxies in the samples used in this work , we shall choose the third method ( the one that corresponds to the red dashed line ) as our best estimator of the @xmath8 - @xmath9 relation and the @xmath104 - @xmath9 relation . this choice will introduce some systematic bias which is , nonetheless , smaller than the typical uncertainty involved in the determination of the @xmath8 - @xmath9 relation . we also considered whether abundance matching our hi - selected smf with the hmf excluding subhaloes would give consistent results with our fiducial abundance matching result , obtained by matching our optically - selected smf and the hmf including subhaloes . physically , this consideration was motivated by the fact that satellite galaxies tend to be redder than central galaxies of the same mass ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , and so hi - selection may be equivalent to the exclusion of satellite galaxies from an observational sample . however , the comparison in fig . [ censatbis ] of our hi - selected smf with the smf for central galaxies of @xcite shows that this argument may not be valid . we note that the comparison between the yang et al . smf for central galaxies and our hi - selected smf is subject to observational systematics , such as the distance assignment scheme or the stellar mass estimator ; for example using hubble distances for the galaxies in our hi - selected sample ( see fig . [ fig : hubble_vs_flow ] ) would bring the two distributions in fair agreement . relation ) . the thick yellow line shows our main result , obtained from abundance matching the stellar mass function of our optically - selected sample with the halo mass function including subhaloes . the yellow dashed and dash - dotted lines correspond to variations of our main result , obtained by considering the @xcite smf and excluding subhaloes from the hmf respectively , and are shown to illustrate uncertainties . the magenta dotted , cyan dashed , blue dot - dashed , green solid and red solid lines correspond to the abundance matching results of @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite , respectively . the big green circles are the results of a stacked weak lensing study of sdss galaxies by @xcite . all other data points refer to measurements for individual galaxies : the small circles correspond to galaxies with halo mass measurements from weak lensing studies ( @xcite : cyan circles ; @xcite : red circles ; @xcite : blue circles ) . the star symbols show galaxies in which the halo mass was determined from studies of stellar dynamics ( @xcite : cyan stars ; @xcite : red stars ) . the triangles show galaxies with halo masses determined from the disc rotation speed ( @xcite : cyan triangles ; @xcite : red triangles ; @xcite : blue triangles ) . the dotted - dashed horizontal line shows the cosmic baryon fraction @xmath121 . ] our abundance matching analysis produces two main results : 1 . we determine @xmath122 as a function of @xmath9 by comparing the galaxy stellar mass function ( smf ) from our optical sample to the total halo mass function ( including subhaloes ) . [ item1 ] 2 . we determine @xmath123 as a function of @xmath9 by comparing the baryonic mass function ( bmf ) from our optically selected sample to the total halo mass function ( including subhaloes ) . [ item2 ] the latter relation is the focus of this paper , but we first discuss the former because the results can be compared to an extensive literature of previous studies . the consistency of our findings with previous work on point [ item1 ] boosts our confidence that our conclusions on point [ item2 ] are robust . figure [ fig : am1 ] shows our result for @xmath122 as a function of @xmath9 , obtained from our optically selected sample ( gold thick solid line ) . our analysis extends to halo masses as low as @xmath124 , since both our optically - selected and hi - selected samples probe stellar masses down to @xmath125 . at the high mass end , our relation stops at @xmath126 because our galactic samples are drawn from a relatively small volume , and are not appropriate to measure the abundance of the most massive galaxies and clusters . we find good agreement with previous estimates from abundance matching obtained in the same manner ( @xcite : cyan dashed line ; @xcite : blue dotted - dashed line ; @xcite : green solid line ; @xcite : red solid line ; @xcite : purple dotted line ) . the thick yellow dash - dotted and dashed lines are shown to illustrate the systematics introduced by the choice of hmf and smf : the former represents the abundance matching result when our fiducial smf is matched the hmf excluding subhaloes ; the latter is the result of matching the yang et al . smf with our fiducial hmf , which includes subhaloes . we also compare our average @xmath8 - @xmath9 relation with values measured for individual galaxies . the small cyan , red and blue circles correspond to galaxies with measurements of their halo mass @xmath9 from weak lensing @xcite . the star symbols correspond to galaxies for which @xmath9 was estimated form stellar dynamics @xcite . the triangles correspond to disc galaxies for which @xmath9 was determined from their rotation speed @xcite . we remark that , while results for individual galaxies have large scatter , they seem to be systematically lower than any of the relations inferred from abundance matching ( at least over the halo mass range @xmath127 ) . furthermore , the halo mass for which @xmath128 has a maximum appears to be higher when inferred from measurements of individual galaxies compared to the value derived from abundance matching : in the first case the peak is at @xmath129 , while in the second case it is at @xmath130 . there is also slight disagreement of all abundance matching results with the results of @xcite ( large green circles ) , who used a stacked weak lensing analysis of over a hundred thousand disk galaxies in sdss separated in three bins of stellar mass . regardless of the method used , however , there is a clear consensus that @xmath122 is much lower than the universal baryon fraction @xmath121 ( horizontal black dash - dotted line in figure [ fig : am1 ] ) , at all halo masses . relation ) . the gray shaded area shows the results of an abundance matching analysis of our optically - selected sample . its boundaries correspond to two extreme assumptions for the gas content of galaxies detected optically but not in hi : i ) galaxies that are not detected in hi contain no gas ( lower boundary ) and ii ) galaxies that are not detected in hi contain the largest amount of gas that could have escaped detection from alfalfa ( upper boundary ) . the thick solid yellow line is the @xmath128-@xmath9 relation ( same as in figure [ fig : am1 ] ) , and is shown for comparison . the dotted - dashed line shows the baryon fraction that @xcite predict based on hydrodynamic simulations that include cosmic reionisation . ] let us now examine the results for the @xmath123 - @xmath9 relation ( fig . [ fig : am2 ] ) . the gray shaded area shows the relation derived from our optically - selected sample , matched to a halo mass function that includes both haloes and subhaloes : its upper and lower envelopes correspond to the distribution for @xmath131 and @xmath132 , respectively , as defined in [ sec : derived ] . the thick gold solid line represents the relation for the stellar mass ( same as in figure [ fig : am1 ] ) and has been added for reference . figure [ fig : am2 ] puts in evidence the fact that @xmath21 decreases monotonically with decreasing halo mass , despite the fact that atomic gas contributes progressively more to the baryonic mass budget of galaxies . - @xmath9 relation derived in this work from our optically - selected sample ( same as fig . [ fig : am2 ] ) . the magenta dotted line and the green solid lines show the @xmath123 - @xmath9 relations that @xcite and @xcite derived from their @xmath122 - @xmath9 relations ( fig . [ fig : am1 ] ) , using the mean gas - to - stellar mass ratio as a function of stellar mass to account for the gas content of galaxies . the black solid line correspond to the results obtained from our optically - selected sample when we use the same method . the red solid line represents the result of @xcite , who used separate @xmath133 - @xmath8 relations for blue and red central galaxies . lastly , the thin black dotted - dashed line is the same as fig . [ fig : am3 ] and shows the baryon fraction that @xcite predict based on hydrodynamic simulations that include cosmic reionisation . ] in fig . [ fig : am3 ] we compare our results to those by @xcite and @xcite , who derived their @xmath123 - @xmath9 relations from the equation @xmath134 in eqn . [ eqn : mbmh ] the baryonic mass is computed from the stellar mass , using the mean gas - to - stellar mass ratio for galaxies as a function of stellar mass . to enable a cleaner comparison , we have made the exercise of re - deriving the @xmath123 - @xmath9 relation from our @xmath122 - @xmath9 relation , using the same procedure followed by @xcite ( as in eq . [ eqn : mbmh ] ) . the result is shown by the black solid line in fig . [ fig : am3 ] . the main difference between the results obtained by using individual galaxy gas masses ( gray shaded region ) and by adopting a mean gas - to - stellar mass ratio ( black solid line ) seems to be an artificial flattening of the @xmath135 relation at low masses . this is probably due to the fact that the latter method ignores the large scatter of galactic @xmath136 values from the mean , and leads to the incorrect interpretation that the baryon retention fraction ( @xmath21 ) of low - mass halos asymptotes to some fixed value . the red solid line in fig . [ fig : am3 ] corresponds to the result of @xcite , who used a separate mean @xmath136 - @xmath8 relation for blue and red galaxies . their result shows no signs of flattening at low masses , however the relation only extends down to @xmath137 . independently of the used method however , all results point to values of @xmath21 that are well below unity , and can not be explained by the effects of cosmic reionization alone ( black dotted - dashed line in fig . [ fig : am3 ] ; see sec . [ sec : discussion ] for details ) . ) for the galaxies in our optically - selected sample that are detected by alfalfa , while the red inverted triangles are maximum hi - fractions ( @xmath138 ) for a representative subset of our optically - selected galaxies that are not detected by alfalfa . ] the @xmath139 relation that we use to evaluate the right hand side of eqn . [ eqn : mbmh ] ( black solid line in fig . [ fig : gsmr ] ) is a power - law fit to the @xmath99 data by @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . the best fit relation , plotted as a thin solid black line in fig . [ fig : gsmr ] , is given by @xmath140 . the blue contours in fig . [ fig : gsmr ] represent the distribution of @xmath99 values for the galaxies in our optically - selected sample that are detected by alfalfa . since the alfalfa survey is a blind hi survey with a fixed integration time per pointing , the alfalfa distribution is expected to lie above the data obtained by pointed observations of optically - selected galaxies ( as in @xcite ) . the inverted red triangles correspond to the maximum hi - fraction ( @xmath138 ) for a representative subsample of our optically - selected galaxies that lack an alfalfa detection . note that these upper limits are also systematically higher than the relationship indicated by the power - law fit . the main result of this paper is the large `` gap '' between the present - day baryon fraction of galaxies in low - mass halos and the cosmic value ( @xmath121 ) , which is present even when the atomic gas content of the galaxies is taken into account . this result is not contrived , given that atomic gas dominates the baryonic mass budget of galaxies with @xmath141 . moreover , the low - mass behavior is in disagreement with previous studies ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , who find that the @xmath21 - @xmath9 relation flattens out at low masses , and approaches a roughly constant value of @xmath142 . these previous results would then require an exceptionally low efficiency of gas - to - stars conversion in low mass systems to explain the observed values of @xmath11 , which decrease monotonically . in fig . [ fig : am2 ] we compare our result for the baryon fraction of halos to the predictions at @xmath143 of a cosmological hydrodynamic simulation that includes heating from a photoionizing uv background ( * ? ? ? * black dotted - dashed curve ) . at the high - mass end ( @xmath144 ) , the low values of @xmath21 can be explained by the fact that infalling gas is shock - heated @xcite , and is kept hot by feedback from active galactic nuclei @xcite . this picture is supported by considerable observational evidence in the case of x - ray groups and clusters , but the situation within individual galaxies is not so well understood ( see @xcite for a review ) . at the low mass end , photoionization heating is expected to become important , since the intergalactic medium is too hot to fall into the shallow potential wells of haloes with @xmath145 , and their baryon fraction is heavily suppressed . however , this process alone can not account for the shape of the @xmath21 - @xmath9 relation at low masses , especially for the onset of a sharp decrease in the @xmath123 ratio at relatively large halo masses ( @xmath146 ) . additional feedback is therefore needed , usually attributed to the ejection of baryons by stellar - driven winds . semianalytic models of galaxy formation based on this assumption reproduce a good fit to luminosity functions in the local universe @xcite but the implied outflow rates are enormous . to reproduce the result presented in figure [ fig : am2 ] , the outflow rate in a halo with @xmath147 must be of order a hundred times higher than the star formation rate . it is difficult at present to reproduce such outflow rates in hydrodynamic simulations . moreover , observational estimates place the total mass of outflows in normal star - forming galaxies at approximately the same level as the galaxies final stellar mass @xcite . even in the most extreme observational cases , the `` mass - loading factor '' ( the ratio of mass loss rate due to outflows over the star formation rate ) is estimated to be @xmath148 @xcite . therefore , explaining in detail the mechanisms responsible for the very low @xmath21 values found in low - mass galaxies seems to be a fundamental challenge for models of galaxy formation in a @xmath0cdm cosmological context . recent cosmological hydrodynamic simulations have challenged this statement , by managing to reproduce `` realistic '' galaxies whose properties satisfy a number of observational constraints . for example , the high - resolution eris simulation @xcite has managed to produce a milky - way type object with values of @xmath11 in agreement with those that we see in fig . [ fig : am2 ] . more recently , @xcite has managed to reproduce a population of @xmath1491000 simulated galaxies with low stellar - to - halo mass ratios ( @xmath150 at @xmath151 ) , in accordance to observations . notice , however , that this simulation uses a kinetic rather than thermal wind model , in which the initial wind speed is @xmath152 and the initial mass - loading factor is a factor of four , by construction . lastly , the work of @xcite has been extended to lower masses by @xcite , who managed to produce a pair of dwarf galaxies ( @xmath153 ) , which obey the observed `` baryonic tully - fisher '' relation and are therefore expected to have the correct baryon - to - halo mass fractions . while these studies indicate that we may be heading toward a solution of the discrepancy between the observed and the expected baryon content of dark matter halos , many questions ( e.g. the expected outflow rates and re - accretion timescales ) remain unanswered . therefore , explaining in detail the mechanisms responsible for the very low @xmath21 values found in low - mass galaxies remains an open problem for studies of galaxy formation in a @xmath0cdm universe . furthermore , our measurement of @xmath154 provides an additional constraint with which cosmological hydrodynamical simulations and semianalytic models will have to confront . we use optical data from the seventh data release of the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss dr7 ) and 21 cm emission - line data from the arecibo legacy fast alfa ( alfalfa ) survey to measure the `` baryonic mass '' ( defined as @xmath22 ) of galaxies in the local universe , and determine the @xmath143 baryon mass function ( bmf ) . we use both an hi - selected and an optically - selected sample ( 7195 and 22587 galaxies respectively ) drawn from the same volume , in order to address the effects of sample selection on the derived distributions . we find that the main difference consists of the optically - selected stellar mass function ( smf ) being systematically larger at high - masses than the hi - selected smf , and find that this difference carries over to the high - mass end of the bmf ( see fig . [ fig : opt_vs_hi_gsmf ] & [ fig : opt_vs_hi_bmf ] ) . we combine the obtained mass distributions with the halo mass function in a wmap3 @xmath0cdm cosmology , to obtain average values of @xmath128 and @xmath135 as a function of halo mass ( fig . [ fig : am1 ] & [ fig : am2 ] ) . our most important result is that low - mass halos seem to have very low galactic baryon fractions compared to the cosmic value ( @xmath2 ) , even when their atomic gas content is taken into account ; for example , the average baryon fraction of halos with @xmath155 is just 2% of the cosmic value ( @xmath156 ) , and displays a monotonically decreasing trend . this result contrasts with previous indirect measurements of the bmf @xcite , which pointed to an approximately constant value of @xmath157 at the low halo - mass end . such very low values of @xmath21 are difficult to reconcile with current models of galaxy formation . photoionization heating in the early universe suppresses the baryonic content of halos only at @xmath158 @xcite , but this mass is more than an order of magnitude smaller than what is required by our result . therefore , additional feedback mechanisms , such as baryon blowout by supernova explosions , must be present and must be extremely efficient . it is not yet clear whether hydrodynamic simulations or observational results can accommodate such intense galactic outflows in low mass halos . as a result , the observed @xmath21 - @xmath9 relation remains difficult to explain , and may represent a challenge to our understanding of galaxy formation and/or the properties of dark matter . the authors acknowledge the work of the entire alfalfa collaboration team in observing , flagging , and extracting the catalog of galaxies used in this work . the alfalfa team at cornell is supported by nsf grants ast-0607007 and ast-1107390 to rg and mph and by grants from the brinson foundation . ep would also like to thank the onassis foundation for partial support . ac thanks alexie leauthaud for providing many of the data points used to make fig . [ fig : am1 ] . funding for the sdss and sdss - ii has been provided by the alfred p. sloan foundation , the participating institutions , the national science foundation , the us department of energy , the nasa , the japanese monbukagakusho , the max planck society and the higher education funding council for england . the sdss web site is ` http://www.sdss.org ` . the sdss is managed by the astrophysical research consortium for the participating institutions . Abstract:
[ "we use both an hi - selected and an optically - selected galaxy sample to directly measure the abundance of galaxies as a function of their `` baryonic '' mass ( stars + atomic gas ) . stellar masses are calculated based on optical data from the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ) and atomic gas masses are calculated using atomic hydrogen ( hi ) emission line data from the arecibo legacy fast alfa ( alfalfa ) survey . by using the technique of abundance matching , we combine the measured baryonic function ( bmf ) of galaxies with the dark matter halo mass function in a @xmath0cdm universe , in order to determine the galactic baryon fraction as a function of host halo mass . we find that the baryon fraction of low - mass halos is much smaller than the cosmic value , even when atomic gas is taken into account . we find that the galactic baryon deficit increases monotonically with decreasing halo mass , in contrast with previous studies which suggested an approximately constant baryon fraction at the low - mass end . we argue that the observed baryon fractions of low mass halos can not be explained by reionization heating alone , and that additional feedback mechanisms ( e.g. supernova blowout ) must be invoked . however , the outflow rates needed to reproduce our result are not easily accommodated in the standard picture of galaxy formation in a @xmath0cdm universe ." ]
12,243
12,243
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in qed , the landau - pomeranchuk - migdal ( lpm ) effect interpolates between the bethe - heitler and factorization limit for the radiation spectrum of a charged particle undergoing multiple , @xmath4 say , scatterings in a medium . if the separation between scattering centers is very large , then the radiation off these centers reduces to a sum of radiation spectra for @xmath4 small - angle scatterings - this is the bethe - heitler limit . in the opposite limit , when the scattering centers sit too close together to be resolved by the emitted photon , the observed radiation factorizes into a product of a single scattering bethe - heitler spectrum for momentum transfer @xmath5 and the elastic cross section for the momentum transfer @xmath6 accumulated over @xmath4 small - angle scatterings . as first noted by landau and pomeranchuk @xcite , the relevant length scale for the interpolation between bethe - heitler and factorization limit is the coherence length ( formation length ) @xmath7 , determined by the longitudinal momentum transfer @xmath8 , @xmath9 this characterizes the longitudinal scale on which the radiated particle becomes distinguishable from its radiating parent . scattering amplitudes for the radiation off different scattering centers interfer destructively if their separation is less than @xmath7 : the _ coherent _ factorization limit is suppressed in the ultrarelativistic limit with respect to the _ incoherent _ bethe - heitler limit . for a quantitative description of the lpm interference effect , the relative phases of the different contributions to the @xmath4-fold scattering amplitude matter . these depend on the transverse energies and thus require knowledge about the transverse motion of the radiating particle in the medium . migdal @xcite was the first to develop a dynamical description to this aim , employing a two - dimensional fokker - planck transport equation @xcite for the hard parton . in the limit of an infinite medium , his well - known result shows a characteristic @xmath10 low frequency suppression of @xmath11 compared to the constant dependence in the bethe - heitler limit , i.e. , the coherent factorization limit for @xmath12 vanishes . this is , however , only a very special feature of migdal s limiting case , where the formation length goes to infinity for @xmath12 , but never exceeds the ( infinite ) extension @xmath13 of the medium . for a medium of finite size , the formation length does exceed the system size below some critical frequency @xmath14 , and the bethe - heitler limit is finite . migdals @xmath15-dependence is hence not valid for @xmath16 . moreover , additional effects become important for the radiation spectrum at lower frequencies @xcite . most notably , this is the transition radiation and the ter - mikaelian effect @xcite of dielectric suppression . the renewed interest in the lpm - effect has at least two reasons : on the one hand , fourty years after discovering the theoretical principles @xcite , the first precision measurements of the lpm - effect @xcite ( and the ter - mikaelian effect @xcite ) were made recently by the slac-146 collaboration . on the other hand , with the advent of a new generation of relativistic heavy ion colliders at rhic and lhc , the understanding of the non - abelian analogue becomes important . in the qed case , the experiment explored relatively thin targets with @xmath17 on the order 0.1 to 10 , in which the transition between bethe - heitler and factorization limit occurs . for a quantitative understanding , a realistic theory has to account for the finite extension of the target , the multiple elastic scatterings in the target , multiple photon emission , and possibly additional complications like radiation off structured targets . there are at least three modern approaches , which can account in principle for the lpm - effect in realistic targets . they implement the eikonal approximation for the radiating hard particle in different ways : i ) blankenbecler and drell @xcite ( see also baier and katkov @xcite ) started from the solution of the klein - gordon equation for the charged particle in the presence of an external field . the solution was approximated to order @xmath18 in a high energy expansion in which the eikonal path of the radiating particle is recovered . ii ) zakharov @xcite proposed a light - cone path integral formulation which describes in a coordinate - space representation the transverse momentum kicks on the eikonal path , mimicking the elastic scatterings by an effective dipole cross section . zakharov s work @xcite provides the most accurate description of the measured data so far . as we shall see in section [ sec2c ] , his starting point is closely related to a high energy expansion of the dirac equation in the presence of an external potential . iii ) a third approach is due to r. baier et al . ( bdmps ) @xcite , who started from the radiation amplitudes for @xmath4-fold scattering in the eikonal approximation . for qed , the consistency of their approach and the work of blankenbecler and drell can be checked diagrammatically @xcite . a discussion of the lpm effect also exists for non - equilibrium conditions @xcite . in the qcd case , high @xmath19 gev jets will be one of the new probes of the dense matter produced in relativistic heavy ion collisions . deviations from factorized perturbative qcd due to final state rescattering are sensitive to the density and coupling in the plasma and will affect key observables like the high momentum tails of single particle spectra . the corresponding study of qcd radiative energy loss due to final state rescattering was initiated by gyulassy and wang @xcite . recently , it has been extended most notably in a series of papers by bdmps @xcite using equal time perturbation theory . also , zakharov has pointed out that his formalism can be adopted to qcd bremsstrahlung with a dipole prescription @xcite , and the equivalence of zakharov s formalism with the work of bdmps was sketched @xcite . all these calculations of the lpm - effect in qcd , however , are ( 1 ) limited to the cases of infinitely many or very few ( @xmath20 ) rescatterings of the parton , and ( 2 ) they mainly focus on the angular integrated energy loss @xmath21 in which the transverse momentum dependence of the radiation pattern is averaged out . this energy loss , however , is not a good observable for qcd , because the parton shower is not directly observable due to hadronization . in addition , the qcd bremsstrahlung of hard jets must compete with the hard radiation associated with the jet production . to detect modifications of this hard vacuum bremsstrahlung spectrum due to final state rescattering requires knowledge about the angular distribution of the spectrum . in qcd , the transverse momentum dependence of the lpm - effect is thus indispensable for a quantitative understanding of radiative energy loss . recently , kopeliovich , schfer and tarasov ( kst ) @xcite have used the furry approximation of the dirac equation in order to account for the transverse momentum dependence of the radiation spectrum emitted in a multiple scattering process . for the case of qcd bremsstrahlung radiation , they translate their qed results into qcd via an _ a posteriori _ dipole prescription ( [ 5.1 ] ) . this strategy is frequently used not only for the calculation of the radiative energy loss of high @xmath22 partons @xcite , but also for the description of nuclear shadowing in the target rest frame @xcite and for related problems of diffractive dissociation of virtual photons @xcite . as we show in what follows , an extension of the kst - formalism has great potential for the calculation of radiative energy loss in realistic scenarios since ( 1 ) it provides a smooth interpolation between the cases of infinitely many and very few rescatterings and ( 2 ) it allows to compare qed - inspired calculations of qcd radiative energy loss with perturbative qcd results . the present work focuses on the general formalism , its region of validity , and a qualitative discussion of its generic features . it gives expressions which allow for the numerical calculation of the radiation spectrum as a function of the medium density and extension , but it leaves phenomenological applications to further publications . our work is organized as follows . in section [ sec2 ] , we derive the starting point of our discussion , the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) . we discuss how a technical complication , the regularization of this spectrum , can be dealt with analytically , and we calculate the corresponding integrated energy loss . section [ sec3 ] focuses on limiting cases of the general radiation formula ( [ 2.22 ] ) . we derive the radiation spectra for @xmath23 , @xmath1 and @xmath2 scatterings and we show that these reproduce the bethe - heitler and the factorization limit . in section [ sec4 ] , the dipole approximation of the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) is discussed . this gives access to true in medium properties of the radiation spectrum which can not be obtained from an expansion to finite order in the coupling constant . finally , we discuss in section [ sec5 ] how this method can be extended to qcd and how it compares to results from perturbative qcd . our main results are summarized in the conclusion . an expansion of the lpm - radiation cross section in orders of the coupling constant is essentially an expansion in the number of elastic scatterings , since each elastic scattering mott cross section is proportional to @xmath24 . in contrast , a high energy expansion of the solution of the dirac equation in the presence of an external field takes to leading order in @xmath18 an arbitrary number of elastic scatterings into account . in this section , we derive the corresponding high energy limit of the qed radiation cross section for a hard electron , traversing a medium of longitudinal density @xmath25 . the physics contained in our main result ( [ 2.22 ] ) will be discussed in the following sections [ sec3 ] - [ sec5 ] . our approach in [ sec2a ] parallels to a large extent that of kopeliovich , schfer and tarasov ( kst ) in ref . we present the derivation in full detail to introduce our notation and to discuss all the approximations involved in the calculation . in contrast to ref . @xcite , our radiation cross section ( [ 2.22 ] ) contains an @xmath26-regularization whose treatment is discussed in subsection [ sec2b ] . then we show that the kst - formalism results in an angular integrated energy loss formula from which modifications to zakharov s formalism @xcite can be obtained . we consider a relativistic electron undergoing multiple small - angle scattering in a spatially extended medium , described by an external potential @xmath27 . the angular dependence of the radiation spectrum for emitted photons carrying away a fraction @xmath28 of the incident electron energy @xmath29 is given by the differential cross section @xmath30 where @xmath31 and @xmath32 denote the transverse momenta of the photon and outgoing electron , respectively . the radiation amplitude for transversely polarized photons is given in terms of the ingoing and outgoing electron wavefunctions @xmath33 and @xmath34 , @xmath35 here , @xmath36 , and @xmath37 is the adiabatic switching off of the interaction term at large distances . this term plays an important role in what follows since the @xmath38 limit does not commute with the longitudinal @xmath39-integration . the wavefunctions @xmath40 solve the dirac equation in the external potential @xmath27 : @xmath41\ , \psi(x , p_{1,2 } ) = 0\ , . \label{2.3}\ ] ] following kopeliovich et al . @xcite , we rewrite the dirac equation @xmath42 \psi(x , p_{1,2 } ) \nonumber \\ & & = \left [ -i\ , \bbox{\alpha}\cdot\left(\bbox{\nabla}u({\bf x})\right ) - u^2({\bf x})\right ] \psi(x , p_{1,2})\ , . \label{2.4}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this allows for an expansion to order @xmath18 , treating the right hand side as a small perturbation , solving the corresponding homogeneous problem and including in a first iteration the derivative term @xmath43 . the result is the furry approximation @xcite : @xmath44 which is exact to order @xmath45 and @xmath46 . the building blocks of this solution are the differential operators @xmath47 and the functions @xmath48 whose properties we explain now : to determine the functions @xmath48 , we neglect the second derivative @xmath49 in ( [ 2.4 ] ) . this is allowed since the longitudinal distances in a multiple scattering problem are much larger than the transverse ones . the left hand side of ( [ 2.4 ] ) reduces then to a two - dimensional schrdinger equation , with corresponding retarded green s function @xmath50\ , g(z_2,{\bf r}_2;z_1,{\bf r}_1|{\bf p } ) \nonumber \\ & & \qquad \qquad = i\,\delta(z_2-z_1)\,\delta({\bf r}_2-{\bf r}_1 ) \label{2.7}\ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] satisfying @xmath51 and vanishing for @xmath52 . the functions @xmath48 in ( [ 2.5 ] ) , ( [ 2.6 ] ) are solutions of this two - dimensional schrdinger equation , @xmath53 for very early and very late times , i.e. for far forward and far backward longitudinal distances @xmath54 and @xmath55 respectively , they satisfy the boundary conditions @xmath56 this ensures that the wavefunctions @xmath57 approximate plane waves at asymptotic distances . the differential operators @xmath58 are obtained by including the derivative term @xmath59 of ( [ 2.4 ] ) in a first iteration of this solution , @xmath60 we now explain how to obtain from the furry approximation an explicit expression of the differential radiation cross section ( [ 2.1 ] ) . we work in the ultrarelativistic limit , @xmath61 , @xmath62 , @xmath63 . the longitudinal axis is redefined to be parallel to the emitted photon @xmath64 , see figure [ fig4 ] . the transverse momenta of the ingoing ( @xmath65 ) and outgoing ( @xmath66 ) electron for small @xmath28 are therefore @xmath67 = 7.5 cm for the calculation of @xmath68 , we use the following four steps : + 1 ) we do the time - integral in ( [ 2.2 ] ) which ensures energy conservation , @xmath69 . + 2 ) we determine the @xmath39-dependent phase factor @xmath70 for ( [ 2.2 ] ) by observing that the @xmath39-dependent phases in ( [ 2.5 ] ) , ( [ 2.6 ] ) come with the modulus of the spatial momentum @xmath71 . using energy - momentum conservation , one finds to leading order @xmath18 @xmath72 the inverse momentum transfer @xmath73 is often refered to as photon formation length @xmath7 . however , contributions from transverse energies @xmath74 dominate the @xmath39-dependent phase factor of @xmath75 , as will be seen below . hence , @xmath7 gives only a rough upper estimate for the longitudinal size over which interference effects suppress photon emission . + 3 ) we absorb in ( [ 2.2 ] ) the spinor structure of the wavefunctions @xmath76 , @xmath77 in the interaction vertex @xmath78 depending on the electron spin of the ingoing ( @xmath79 ) and outgoing ( @xmath80 ) electron and the photon helicity ( @xmath81 ) , this vertex takes the form @xmath82 \nonumber \\ & & \times \left ( { \partial\over \partial r_x } -i\ , \lambda_\gamma\ , { \partial\over \partial r_y } \right)\ , , \label{2.15 } \\ \widehat\gamma_r\bigl(\lambda_e=-\lambda_{e ' } , \lambda_\gamma\bigr ) & = & 2\ , m_e\ , x\ , \lambda_\gamma\ , \delta_{\lambda_\gamma\ , , 2\lambda_e } \ , , \label{2.16}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the spin - flip contribution ( [ 2.16 ] ) is only non - vanishing for @xmath83 . the differential operators in ( [ 2.14 ] ) act to the right on the two different transverse components of @xmath84 . in what follows , we are only interested in the spin- and helicity - averaged combination @xmath85 which takes the simple form @xmath86 \frac{\partial}{\partial{\bf r } } \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial{\bf r'}}\ , + 2m_e^2x^2\ , . \label{2.17}\ ] ] 4 ) we split up the green s functions @xmath87 at longitudinal distances @xmath88 in such a way that contributions from the amplitude ( [ 2.2 ] ) and its complex conjugate part can be paired , see eg . ( [ 2.18 ] ) and fig . [ fig1 ] . after these four steps , the radiation probability can be expressed as a fourier transform over pairs of green s functions on whose transverse coordinates the interaction vertex ( [ 2.17 ] ) is acting : @xmath89 to turn this into an explicit expression , it is necessary to i ) calculate the averages @xmath90 over the scattering centers in the medium and ii ) evaluate the green s functions @xmath91 which are given by path integrals @xmath92 \right\ } \label{2.19}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with boundary conditions @xmath93 , @xmath94 . we show in appendix [ appa ] that the in medium averages involved in ( [ 2.18 ] ) result in a factor which depends on the cross section @xmath95 times the density @xmath25 of scattering centers as follows @xmath96 \right\}\bigg\rangle \nonumber \\ & & \qquad = \exp\left\ { - \int\limits_{z}^{z'}{\it d}\xi\ , \sigma\bigr(\xi,\left[\bbox{r}(\xi)-\bbox{r}'(\xi)\right]\bigl ) \right\}\ , , \label{2.20 } \\ & & \sigma\bigl(\xi,\bbox{\rho}(\xi)\bigr ) = \frac{1}{2}\ , n(\xi)\ , % \theta_a\ , \sigma\bigl(\bbox{\rho}(\xi)\bigr)\ , . \label{2.21 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] an explicit expression for @xmath97 , supporting its interpretation as a mott cross section , is also derived in appendix [ appa ] . most importantly , the resulting expression @xmath98 depends only on the relative distance @xmath99 between the paths @xmath100 and @xmath101 . as we explain in appendix [ appb ] , this makes it possible to carry out a large number of the integrals and path - integrals in ( [ 2.18 ] ) analytically . one obtains ( see appendix [ appb ] for further details ) @xmath102 { \cal k}\bigl(z',\bbox{\rho}_2;z,\bbox{\rho}_1|\mu\bigr ) \ , . \label{2.22 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] this differs from the result in @xcite by including the regularization @xmath103 . the physical radiation spectrum is obtained by removing @xmath38 _ after _ doing the @xmath39 and @xmath88-integrations and taking @xmath104 and @xmath105 . to simplify the notation , we define @xmath106 which plays the role of mass , and the factor @xmath107 which accounts for a combination of recurring kinematical prefactors . the coefficients of the spin - flip ( @xmath108 ) and non - flip ( @xmath109 ) contributions of the interaction vertex ( [ 2.17 ] ) read @xmath110 the remaining path integral @xmath111 in ( [ 2.22 ] ) is given by @xmath112 \right\}\ , . \label{2.24}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in this path integral , @xmath113 plays the role of an imaginary potential , while its physical interpretation is up to a minus sign that of an elastic mott cross section times the density of scattering centers , cf . equation ( [ a.12 ] ) . depending on the context , we shall hence refer to @xmath114 as a potential or a cross section . the following sections are devoted to a study of the differential cross section ( [ 2.22 ] ) . we focus on analytically accessible limiting cases which illustrate the physics contained in ( [ 2.22 ] ) and we discuss approximations which allow for its numerical analysis . the regularization prescription in ( [ 2.22 ] ) can not be neglected since the @xmath38 limit does not commute with the @xmath39- and @xmath88-integrations . this complicates practical applications of ( [ 2.22 ] ) : even if the green s function @xmath111 is known explicitly in some approximation ( see sections [ sec3 ] and [ sec4 ] below ) , the expression ( [ 2.22 ] ) is not suited for numerical calculations since one can not control numerically the @xmath38-limit _ after _ carrying out the @xmath39-integrations . to solve this problem , we determine the @xmath38 limit of the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) analytically . we consider a medium of arbitrary but finite longitudinal extension which is positioned along the longitudinal axis between 0 and the finite distance @xmath13 . the @xmath39- and @xmath88-integrations of ( [ 2.22 ] ) can be split into six parts , @xmath115 to shorten the following calculations , we omit the spin - flip contribution @xmath108 to the radiation spectrum . this contribution is negligible in the relativistic limit @xmath116 on which we focus in the following . [ if needed , the @xmath108-contributions to all our results can be recovered without additional technical difficulties . ] the differential cross section receives six contributions which we label according to ( [ 2.25 ] ) in an obvious way : @xmath117 since the medium does not extend outside the interval @xmath118 $ ] , we can replace the in - medium propagator @xmath119 outside @xmath118 $ ] by the free propagator @xmath120 , given in ( [ 3.3 ] ) below . e.g. , for @xmath121 , we can write @xmath122 this allows to do all `` infinite '' integrals @xmath123 and @xmath124 in ( [ 2.25 ] ) analytically . one is left with the `` finite '' integrals @xmath125 for which the @xmath38 limit commutes with the @xmath39-integration . doing the @xmath39-integrations first , then taking @xmath126 and @xmath127 respectively , and finally adiabatically switching off the regularization , @xmath128 , we find @xmath129 here , the factors @xmath130 contain the explicit solutions of those @xmath39-integrals which extend to @xmath54 or @xmath55 respectively . using the notational shorthands @xmath131 we obtain @xmath132 and analogously , @xmath133 the differential radiation spectrum ( [ 2.26 ] ) given by the equations ( [ 2.28 ] ) - ( [ 2.38 ] ) is suitable for a numerical evaluation since the @xmath38-limit is taken . previous numerical investigations @xcite of ( [ 2.22 ] ) were based on a non - regularized expression which did not include the term @xmath103 in the integrand . the difference to the above results is found by determining the above @xmath39-integrals without regularization : @xmath134 the differential cross - section ( [ 2.22 ] ) can be related to the unregularized one @xmath135 : @xmath136\ , + \ , \theta_{\rm corr}^{\rm osc}[z_-,z_+]\ , . \label{2.44}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , the correction term @xmath137 $ ] summarizes those oscillating contributions which vanish if one averages suitably in a numerical calculation over the boundaries @xmath55 and @xmath54 of the longitudinal integration . in addition , there are two terms which do not depend on the boundaries @xmath55 , @xmath54 . they stem from the terms @xmath138 and @xmath139 which differ by an overall factor 2 from the regularized expressions @xmath140 , @xmath141 . these terms provide the proper subtraction of the weizscker - williams fields of the ingoing and outgoing electron . as will become clear below , they are non - negligible , and ensure e.g. the consistency of ( [ 2.22 ] ) with the bethe - heitler spectrum in the appropriate limiting cases . the total energy loss cross section is calculated by integrating ( [ 2.22 ] ) over transverse momenta . to this aim , we rewrite the differential cross section as a function of the relative momentum transfer @xmath142 and the transverse momentum @xmath31 of the emitted photon . since there is no kinematical boundary on @xmath143 , the integration over the transverse momentum of the electron is simple : @xmath144 { \cal k}\bigl(z',\bbox{\rho}_2=0;z,\bbox{\rho}_1|\mu\bigr ) \ , . \label{2.45 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] the integration over the photon transverse momentum is more complicated due to the finite kinematical boundaries for the photon , @xmath145 : @xmath146 \nonumber \\ & & \qquad \times { \cal k}\bigl(z',\bbox{\rho}_2=0;z,\bbox{\rho}_1|\mu\bigr ) \ , . \label{2.46}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is interesting to compare this energy loss formula to that derived by zakharov @xcite : @xmath147 \nonumber \\ & & \times \left [ { \cal k}\bigl(z',0;z,0|\mu\bigr ) - { \cal k}_0\bigl(z',0;z,0|\mu\bigr ) \right]\ , . \label{2.47 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath120 is the free , non - interacting path integral , given explicitly in ( [ 3.3 ] ) below . if we had ignored the kinematical boundary , extending the @xmath148-integration in ( [ 2.46 ] ) up to infinity , we would have regained the expression of zakharov except for the term proportional to @xmath120 . we note that zakharov s arguments leading to ( [ 2.47 ] ) are very different from our derivation of ( [ 2.46 ] ) . the transverse momentum dependence of the radiation enters in no intermediate step of his calculation @xcite . also , the @xmath120-term in ( [ 2.47 ] ) does not result from a derivation : it is rather subtracted _ a posteriori _ as a ` renormalization prescription ' in order to cancel a singularity in the integrand of ( [ 2.47 ] ) for small @xmath149 . in this sense , our derivation differs from zakharov s result ( [ 2.47 ] ) by : i ) taking the finite phase space of the emitted photon properly into account , ii ) containing a proper @xmath26-regularization of the radiation amplitude and iii ) not employing a subtraction of a singular contribution a posteriori . information about the target medium enters the radiation cross section ( [ 2.22 ] ) via the product @xmath150 , which measures the elastic cross section times the density of scattering centers in the medium . since @xmath151 @xmath25 , an expansion of ( [ 2.22 ] ) in powers of @xmath24 is an expansion in powers of the opacity @xmath152 , where @xmath153 is the effective elastic single scattering cross section and @xmath154 @xmath152 measures the average number of scatterings for an electron traversing a medium of length @xmath13 . since the elastic cross section in ( [ 2.22 ] ) is not a geometrical quantity but depends on the integration variables , our expansion of ( [ 2.22 ] ) will be formally in powers of @xmath155 , and we shall refer by a slight abuse of language to @xmath156 as opacity . of course , after all integrals are done , each power of @xmath155 will be accompanied by a power of the elastic cross section . the @xmath4-th term in this expansion of ( [ 2.22 ] ) is of order @xmath157 and corresponds to the multiple scattering off exactly @xmath4 external potentials . an expansion in the opacity @xmath156 is thus an expansion in the number of rescatterings . below , we study this low opacity expansion of the radiation spectrum up to third order . this leads for equation ( [ 2.22 ] ) to a number of consistency checks which any radiation spectrum including in medium effects should satisfy . moreover , this provides the basis for a discussion of the corresponding qcd radiation spectrum in section [ sec5 ] . the derivation of the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) relies on the approximation that the distribution of scattering centers in the medium can be described by the average ( [ 2.20 ] ) . this uses explicitly that the size of the medium is much larger than the debye radius of a single scattering potential . a priori , it may hence seem unclear to what extent one can still recover from ( [ 2.22 ] ) the correct radiation spectrum for a single scattering process where the extension of the potential is the extension of the target . however , in the low opacity limit , when the distance between scattering centers is much larger than the photon formation length , multiple scattering should not affect the radiation pattern . the radiation spectrum should converge to the single scattering bethe - heitler cross section times the opacity factor @xmath156 . deriving this is an important consistency check for our formalism . our expansion of the integrand of the cross section ( [ 2.22 ] ) in powers of @xmath151 @xmath25 , uses the corresponding expansion of the path integral @xmath158 where from now on , we suppress the explicit @xmath159-dependence in @xmath111 and in the corresponding free green s function @xmath120 , @xmath160 from the two potentials in the third line of ( [ 2.22 ] ) and from the propagator @xmath111 , the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) receives three contributions to order @xmath161 : @xmath162 here , @xmath163 and @xmath164 denote the derivatives of the zeroth and first order contributions to the propagator ( [ 3.2 ] ) , @xmath165 we consider a medium of finite longitudinal extension @xmath13 and homogeneous density @xmath166 . then , all integrals in ( [ 3.5 ] ) - ( [ 3.7 ] ) can be done analytically . taking the limit @xmath38 after the @xmath39-integrations , we arrive at @xmath167 the result is particularly transparent in the relativistic limit , when all mass dependencies can be neglected and @xmath168 . for a medium characterized by a set of yukawa potentials with electric charge @xmath169 and debye screening mass @xmath170 ( see appendix [ appa ] for a derivation ) , @xmath171 denotes the elastic scattering cross section with @xmath143 given by ( [ 2.12 ] ) . the three terms ( [ 3.10])-([3.12 ] ) then combine to @xmath172 this is the high - energy limit of the bethe - heitler radiation cross section for scattering off a yukawa potential times the opacity factor @xmath173 . the exact result [ see e.g. equation ( 5.150 ) of ref . @xcite in the coordinate system fig . [ fig4 ] used here . ] differs from the above approximation only by terms of order @xmath174 and @xmath175 . the main properties of the qed radiation spectrum are seen clearly from ( [ 3.14 ] ) . the spectrum vanishes for vanishing momentum transfer @xmath176 , it shows the @xmath177-dependence characteristic for the qed radiation spectrum peaking at forward rapidity , and it shows the correct @xmath178 @xmath179 dependence . we mention as an aside that the evaluation of the cross section ( [ 3.4 ] ) without regularization prescription leads to terms @xmath180 and @xmath181 which are a factor 2 larger while the interference term remains unchanged . the @xmath26-regularization of ( [ 2.22 ] ) is thus necessary to regain the bethe - heitler spectrum . in complete analogy to the derivation of the bethe - heitler limit , one can expand the cross section ( [ 2.22 ] ) to second order . all contributions to the radiation cross section depend now on the product of two elastic mott cross sections @xmath182 , whose combined momentum transfers sum up to @xmath143 . for this we introduce the shorthand @xmath183 also , we introduce shorthands for the transverse momenta and the corresponding transverse energies , @xmath184 the second order contribution of the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) consists of six terms . after integrating out all transverse coordinates , it takes the form @xmath185\ , n^2_0\ , . \label{3.16}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the first three terms stem from the expansion of the exponential term @xmath186 in ( [ 2.22 ] ) to second order in @xmath114 , the fourth term is from the second order expansion of the green s function @xmath111 , and the remaining two terms are contributions from the first order in @xmath111 times the first order of the exponential term . the variables @xmath187 stand for the remaining longitudinal integrals over phase factors . in general , they are involved , e.g. @xmath188 for a medium of homogeneous density @xmath189 and finite length @xmath13 , they reduce to very simple forms : @xmath190 from this , we read off simple limiting cases : in the limit of a very thin target of fixed opacity , we can move the two scattering centers so close together that the photon can not resolve them . the spectrum is then indistinguishable from a single scattering process @xmath191 this is the coherent factorization limit that corresponds to one single effective bethe - heitler radiation spectrum which depends only on the initial and final momenta . the characterisitc momentum dependence of the bethe - heitler radiation spectrum ( [ 3.14 ] ) is now combined with the convolution of two mott cross sections ( [ 3.15 ] ) . the first @xmath13-dependent correction to this factorization limit is proportional to @xmath192 and takes the form @xmath193\ , , \label{3.25}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which is mainly of formal interest since the @xmath143-integral diverges logarithmically . in the opposite limit , @xmath194 , we can study for fixed opacity @xmath195 the case of two well - separated scattering centers : @xmath196\ , . \label{3.26}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this is the incoherent bethe - heitler limit in which the radiation spectrum is the sum of two independent bethe - heitler contributions associated with the scattering off the first and the second external potential with momentum transfers @xmath197 and @xmath198 , respectively . it provides the starting point for a comparison of the corresponding qcd radiation spectrum with a full @xmath3 perturbative calculation in section [ sec5 ] . the pattern emerging in this expansion to second order in the opacity is fully confirmed in the case of @xmath199 scattering centers . in appendix [ appc ] , we derive the corresponding radiation cross section and check the bethe - heitler and factorization limit . to calculate the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) to all orders in opacity , an approximation scheme for the path integral @xmath111 is needed . the low opacity expansion , studied in section [ sec3 ] , becomes rapidly more complicated for increasing number of scattering centers . it is only useful for the description of ultrathin media where very few elastic scatterings have to be taken into account . for the generic case of a hard projectile particle undergoing many small angle scatterings , the dipole approximation of @xmath111 is standard @xcite . this dipole approximation is based on the observation that for small transverse distances @xmath200 , the cross section @xmath201 of the yukawa potential ( [ a.11 ] ) has a leading quadratic dependence : @xcite @xmath202\ , , \label{4.2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath203 denotes eulers constant . the main contribution to the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) comes from small values of @xmath204 , where @xmath205 shows only a slow logarithmic dependence on @xmath204 and can be approximated by a constant , @xmath206 . for a quadratic dependence @xmath207 , where this logarithmic dependence is weak enough to be neglected , the path integral @xmath111 in ( [ 2.24 ] ) is that of a harmonic oscillator @xcite @xmath208 \over 2\ , \sin(\omega\delta z ) } \right\ } \label{4.3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the oscillator frequency @xmath209 in the following , we exploit the consequences of this approximation . in section [ sec2b ] , we have determined the six contributions ( [ 2.28 ] ) - ( [ 2.33 ] ) to the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) . in the dipole approximation , the transverse integrations in ( [ 2.28 ] ) - ( [ 2.33 ] ) reduce to gaussian integrals and can be done analytically . here we discuss the resulting expression @xmath210 obtained from ( [ 2.26 ] ) . for three of the six terms @xmath211 , all integrals can be done analytically : @xmath212 these terms show a characteristic dependence on the coupling constant : in the dipole approximation , @xmath213 is constant and measures the size of the elastic single scattering mott cross section , see eq . ( [ 4.2 ] ) . thus , @xmath213 and @xmath214 are proportional to @xmath24 , and the three terms @xmath180 , @xmath215 and @xmath216 are non - analytic in the coupling constant . for small @xmath24 , their leading dependence is @xmath217 @xmath218 . we show in the next subsection that these contributions combine to a radiation cross section with a leading dependence @xmath219 @xmath218 . the factor @xmath220 responsible for the remaining non - analyticity of the radiation cross section has an intuitive physical interpretation as molere @xmath143-broadening . this broadening is proportional to the density of the medium @xmath189 , the path length @xmath13 inside the medium and the probability @xmath213 that a scattering center in the medium interacts with the hard electron . as expected from a particle undergoing random motion in the @xmath143-plane , the accumulated average @xmath221 grows proportional to @xmath13 . the corresponding contribution ( [ 4.9 ] ) is seen explicitly in @xmath180 and @xmath215 , but it can also be recovered from @xmath216 in an expansion to lowest order in @xmath24 , when @xmath222 we now turn to the remaining three contributions of the radiation cross section ( [ 4.5 ] ) , which are given in terms of integrals over the longitudinal extension of the medium : @xmath223\ , \times \nonumber \\ & & \quad \exp\left\{{-x^2\over 4\ , c_2 } \left [ b_2^{(1)}\ , { \bf p}_{1\perp}^2 -2\,{\bf p}_{1\perp}\cdot { \bf p}_{2\perp } + b_2^{(2)}\ , { \bf p}_{2\perp}^2 \right ] \right\}\ , , \label{4.11 } \\ & & i_5^{({\rm osc } ) } = { { \rm re}\over q_2 } \int\limits_0^l { \it d}z\ , e^{i\,\bar{q}\,(z - l)}\ , { \pi\ , x^2\over c_5 ^ 2}\ , \nonumber \\ & & \quad\ , \left[a_5^{(2)}\ , { \bf p}_{2\perp}^2 + a_5^{(12)}\ , { \bf p}_{1\perp}\cdot{\bf p}_{2\perp } \right]\ , \times \nonumber \\ & & \quad \exp\left\{{-x^2\over 4\ , c_5 } \left [ b_5^{(1)}\ , { \bf p}_{1\perp}^2 -2\,{\bf p}_{1\perp}\cdot { \bf p}_{2\perp } + b_5^{(2)}\ , { \bf p}_{2\perp}^2 \right ] \right\}\ , , \label{4.12}\\ & & i_4^{({\rm osc } ) } = -\ , { \rm re } \int\limits_0^l { \it d}z\ , \int\limits_z^l { \it d}z'\ , e^{-i\,\bar{q}\,(z'-z ) } { \pi\ , x^2\over c_4 ^ 3}\ , \times \nonumber \\ & & \quad \left [ a_4^{(0 ) } + a_4^{(1)}\ , { \bf p}_{1\perp}^2 + a_4^{(12)}\ , { \bf p}_{1\perp}\cdot{\bf p}_{2\perp } + a_4^{(2)}\ , { \bf p}_{2\perp}^2\right]\ , \times \nonumber \\ & & \quad \exp\left\{{-x^2\over 4\ , c_4 } \left[b_4^{(1)}\ , { \bf p}_{1\perp}^2 - 2\ , { \bf p}_{1\perp}\cdot { \bf p}_{2\perp } + b_4^{(2)}\ , { \bf p}_{2\perp}^2\right ] \right\}\ , . \label{4.13}\end{aligned}\ ] ] to make the structure of these terms transparent , we have introduced several shorthands @xmath224 , @xmath225 and @xmath226 . the factors @xmath225 and @xmath226 show simple limiting behaviour : @xmath227 this allows us to recover the molire @xmath143-broadening term ( [ 4.9 ] ) to leading order in the coupling constant in all six contributions @xmath211 of the radiation spectrum ( [ 4.5 ] ) . the explicit form of the functions @xmath226 are : @xmath228 + \sin[\omega\ , z ] \right\}\ , , \label{4.16 } \\ c_5 & = & { i\ , \mu\over 2}\ , \omega\ , \left\ { \omega\ , z\ , \cos[\omega(l - z ) ] + \sin[\omega(l - z ) ] \right\}\ , , \label{4.17 } \\ c_4 & = & { i\ , \mu\over 2}\,\omega\ , \left\ { -\omega^2\,z\,(l - z')\ , \sin[\omega(z'-z ) ] + \sin[\omega(z'-z ) ] \right . \nonumber \\ & & \left . + \omega\,(l - z'+z)\ , \cos[\omega(z'-z ) ] \right\}\ , , \label{4.18}\end{aligned}\ ] ] from which the limit ( [ 4.14 ] ) is recovered easily . the functions @xmath225 are given by @xmath229 - \omega\ , ( l - z)\ , \sin[\omega\ , z]\ , , \label{4.19 } \\ b_2^{(2 ) } & = & \cos[\omega\ , z]\ , , \label{4.20 } \\ b_5^{(1 ) } & = & \cos[\omega\ , ( l - z)]\ , , \label{4.21 } \\ b_5^{(2 ) } & = & \cos[\omega\ , ( l - z ) ] - \omega\ , z\ , \sin[\omega\ , ( l - z)]\ , , \label{4.22 } \\ b_4^{(1 ) } & = & \cos[\omega\ , ( z'-z ) ] - \omega\ , ( l - z')\ , \sin[\omega\ , ( z'-z ) ] \ , , \label{4.23}\\ b_4^{(2 ) } & = & \cos[\omega\ , ( z'-z ) ] - \omega\ , z\ , \sin[\omega\ , ( z'-z ) ] \ , . \label{4.24}\end{aligned}\ ] ] from which the limiting form ( [ 4.15 ] ) is also clear . finally , the prefactors of the integrands in ( [ 4.11])-([4.13 ] ) are : @xmath230\ , , \label{4.25 } \\ a_5^{(2 ) } & = & { \mu\over 2}\ , \omega^2 z\ , , \qquad a_5^{(12 ) } = { \mu\over 2}\ , \omega\ , \sin[\omega\ , ( l - z)]\ , , \label{4.26 } \\ a_4^{(0 ) } & = & \mu^2\ , \omega^4\ , c_4\ , { 1\over x^2}\ , z(l - z')\ , , \label{4.27 } \\ a_4^{(1 ) } & = & { \mu^2\ , \omega^4\over 4}\ , \left ( ( l - z')^2\ , c + { { l - z'}\over \omega}\ , s\right)\ , , \label{4.28 } \\ a_4^{(2 ) } & = & { \mu^2\ , \omega^4\over 4}\ , \left ( z^2\ , c + { z\over \omega}\ , s\right)\ , , \label{4.29 } \\ a_4^{(12 ) } & = & { \mu^2\ , \omega^4\over 4}\ , \left\ { z(l - z ' ) + \left(z\ , c + { s\over \omega}\right ) \right . \nonumber \\ & & \qquad \qquad \qquad \times \left . \left((l - z')\ , c + { s\over \omega}\right ) \right\}\ , , \label{4.30}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used @xmath231 $ ] and @xmath232 $ ] . the expressions given here allow for a numerical calculation of the radiation spectrum , once the extension @xmath13 of the medium , its density @xmath189 , and the measure @xmath213 of the elastic cross section of a single scatterer are given . based on these expressions , we discuss in the next subsections i ) an analytically accessible limiting case of the spectrum ( [ 4.5 ] ) and ii ) a bethe - heitler limit which allows to determine the constant @xmath213 phenomenologically . we now turn to a limiting case of the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) in which a characteristic in - medium effect can be isolated in a simple analytical expression . this limit focusses on the kinematical region @xmath233 the first condition ( [ 4.31 ] ) is satisfied in the high energy limit when @xmath28 is small and the photon is radiated under a small angle with respect to the beam . it is characteristic for relativistic kinematics that the transverse momentum freed by multiple interactions can be significantly larger than the total transverse momentum @xmath234 transfered by the medium , i.e. , @xmath235 and @xmath236 . according to ( [ 4.32 ] ) and ( [ 4.33 ] ) , the length of the medium has to exceed one formation length significantly , while the last condition @xmath237 can be realized e.g. by choosing a target of sufficiently low density . we note that ( [ 4.33 ] ) is by far the most stringent condition . as a consequences of ( [ 4.32 ] ) and ( [ 4.33 ] ) , the terms @xmath238 , @xmath239 are rapidly oscillating as function of @xmath13 . if we assume a target with varying extension @xmath13 , e.g. due to an unpolished surface , then contributions to the radiation spectrum ( [ 4.5 ] ) proportional to these oscillating terms will be averaged out by the experiment . an expansion of the terms in ( [ 4.5 ] ) in powers of the coupling constant leads then to @xmath240 e^ { - { { \bf q}_{\perp}^2\over 2\ , n\ , c\ , l}}\ , , \label{4.36 } \\ i_3^{({\rm osc } ) } & = & 0 \label{4.37 } \\ i_4^{({\rm osc } ) } & = & \left [ { 2\,\pi\over n\ , c\ , l}\ , { { \bf p}_{*\perp}^2\over q^2 } + { 2\pi\over q^2 } + { { 4\ , \pi}\over q^2}{1\over l^2\ , q^2 } \right ] e^ { - { { \bf q}_{\perp}^2\over 2\ , n\ , c\ , l}}\ , , \label{4.38 } \\ i_5^{({\rm osc } ) } & = & \left [ { -\ , 2\,\pi\over n\ , c\ , l}{{\bf p}_{*\perp}^2\over q^2 } - { 4\pi\over q^2}{1\over l^2\ , q^2 } \right ] e^ { - { { \bf q}_{\perp}^2\over 2\ , n\ , c\ , l}}\ , , \label{4.39 } \\ i_6^{({\rm osc } ) } & = & { 1\over 2}\ , { { \bf p}_{*\perp}^2\over q^2}\ , { 2\,\pi\over n\ , c\ , l}\ , \exp\left\ { - { { \bf q}_{\perp}^2\over 2\ , n\ , c\ , l}\right\}\ , . \label{4.40 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] here , we have used ( [ 4.32 ] ) to neglect the @xmath143-dependent terms except for the leading @xmath241 molire factor ( [ 4.9 ] ) , and we have approximated @xmath242 . corrections to these terms are of order @xmath243 and @xmath244 . neglecting @xmath245-contributions , the radiation spectrum ( [ 4.5 ] ) takes the simple form @xmath246 this molire limit is the main result of the present subsection . in accordance with the bethe - heitler single scattering cross section ( [ 3.14 ] ) , we still find the characteristic @xmath177 rapidity dependence , as well as the @xmath247 fall off of the spectrum in the kinematical regime @xmath248 . in contrast to the single scattering bethe - heitler cross section , however , the spectrum now peaks at vanishing total momentum transfer @xmath249 rather than to vanish for @xmath176 . the reason is that the radiation from many small angle scatterings adds up to a finite contribution , while the sum @xmath250 of many small random momentum transfers @xmath251 peaks at zero . also the dependence of ( [ 4.41 ] ) on the coupling constant is easy to understand . the cross section is proportional to @xmath219 , since one photon is radiated off . the broadening of the @xmath143- distribution is determined by the probability that the hard electron undergoes an interaction . this probability is given by the elastic single scattering mott cross section , and hence the exponent shows a characteristic @xmath217-dependence . the radiation cross section ( [ 4.5 ] ) obtained in the dipole approximation , is clearly more complex than the limiting case ( [ 4.41 ] ) . the latter , however , illustrates most clearly that generic in medium effects are retained in the dipole approximation which can not be obtained from a calculation to fixed order in the coupling constant . in the dipole approximation , the expansion of the radiation cross section ( [ 2.22 ] ) in powers of the coupling constant does not converge . the spectra for @xmath252 scatterings derived in section [ sec3 ] , are proportional to the @xmath4-th power of the elastic scattering cross section @xmath253 which is essentially the fourier transform of @xmath254 . while the fourier transform of the analytic expression ( [ a.11 ] ) for @xmath254 is well - defined , the fourier transform of its dipole approximation @xmath255 diverges . this failure of the dipole approximation to allow for an expansion of ( [ 2.22 ] ) in powers of the opacity @xmath156 does not affect its validity for the calculation of medium effects as given e.g. in the last subsections . this can be seen e.g. from the factor @xmath256 in ( [ 2.22 ] ) . its fourier transform is well - defined and it is well approximated in the dipole approximation @xmath255 by a gaussian of appropriate width . it is only the expansion of this factor in @xmath219 whose fourier transform does not receive the main contributions from small values around @xmath257 . this is the reason why the dipole approximation of @xmath254 for small values of @xmath258 can not be combined without difficulties with an expansion in the coupling constant . for the @xmath143-integrated spectrum ( [ 2.45 ] ) , this technical difficulty does not exist . the reason is that in the integrand of ( [ 2.45 ] ) , the first order term @xmath259 comes multiplied by @xmath260 which is to lowest order in the coupling constant a gaussian in @xmath261 . this ensures that the main contribution to the integral ( [ 2.45 ] ) comes from small values of @xmath258 where the dipole approximation is valid . the corresponding bethe - heitler spectrum in which the dipole approximation is employed _ after _ integrating out the @xmath143-dependence , reads : @xmath262 in the calculation of ( [ 4.42 ] ) we have not neglected the @xmath263-dependence of the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) . the consequence is the apprearance of the very small term @xmath264 which regulates the @xmath265 singularity . this allows to calculate the @xmath31-integrated bethe - heitler energy loss formula in the dipole approximation @xmath266 we note that except for the small correction from the kinematical boundary @xmath267 of the @xmath31-integral , expression ( [ 4.43 ] ) is consistent with the bethe - heitler term derived by zakharov in the dipole approximation @xcite . equations ( [ 4.42 ] ) or ( [ 4.43 ] ) allow to determine the only free parameter @xmath213 from a comparison with well - tabulated bethe - heitler scattering cross section @xcite . once , @xmath213 is fixed , the radiation spectrum ( [ 4.5 ] ) in the dipole approximation provides thus a parameter free prediction of the measured in - medium energy loss . zakharov has pursued this strategy to fix @xmath213 in his @xmath143- and @xmath31- integrated spectrum ( [ 2.47 ] ) , and this has lead to a very successful description of the slac-146 data on radiative energy loss @xcite . to calculate the integrated qcd radiative energy loss of a hard coloured parton , zakharov @xcite has used a very simple substitution in his energy loss formula ( [ 2.47 ] ) . this qcd dipole prescription consists in replacing the dipole cross section @xmath268 in the calculation of the qed radiation spectrum by a combination of three dipole cross sections @xcite : @xmath269 here , we have chosen @xmath270 proportional to the elastic @xmath6-@xmath6 mott cross section , cf . subsection [ sec5a ] . the heuristic argument for the prescription ( [ 5.1 ] ) starts from the representation of the projectile quark in the light cone frame as a superposition of the bare quark and higher fock states , @xmath271 if all fock components interact with the external potentials with the same amplitude , then the coherence between these amplitudes is not disturbed , and no bremsstrahlung is generated . the radiation amplitude depends hence on the difference between the elastic scattering amplitudes of different fluctuations . the dipole cross section @xmath272 contains information about this difference since it arises from averaging in ( [ 2.20 ] ) the ( part of the ) amplitude @xmath68 for the `` ingoing '' @xmath273 with the ( part of the ) complex conjugated amplitude @xmath274 for the `` outgoing '' higher fock state @xmath275 . in the transverse plane , the separation of the @xmath275 fluctuation from the ingoing @xmath6 can be estimated via the uncertainty relation : @xmath276 and @xmath277 . the transverse distance @xmath258 is linked to the transverse momentum in ( [ 2.22 ] ) by a fourier transform and we may think of @xmath258 as the transverse size of the @xmath263-@xmath278 fluctuation . with the transverse center of mass of this fluctuation at the position of the ingoing quark @xmath273 , see figure [ fig2 ] , the transverse distance between the charged components @xmath6 and @xmath263 is then @xmath279 , and it is the dipole of this size which determines the radiation spectrum . for related arguments , see also ref . @xcite . = 7.5 cm in qcd , the emitted gluon is charged too , and aside from the @xmath6-@xmath263 dipole of size @xmath279 , there is a @xmath280-@xmath263 dipole of size @xmath258 and a @xmath280-@xmath6 dipole of size @xmath281 . the prefactors introduced for these dipoles in the prescription ( [ 5.1 ] ) stem from interpolating between the limits @xmath282 in the limit @xmath283 , the @xmath284 pair is indistinguishable from a pointlike color - octet charge and the ratio @xmath285 of the octet to triplet couplings arises . in the opposite limit @xmath286 , the gluon - quark pair at vanishing separation is indistinguishable from a pointlike quark . the question to what extent this intuitive physical picture leads to the correct qcd radiation cross section was addressed recently in ref . there it is argued that zakharov s integrated energy loss formula ( [ 2.47 ] ) coincides for qcd with the result of their calculation based on time - ordered perturbation theory . for a discussion of the terms neglected in this approach , see ref . @xcite . here , we contribute to this discussion by comparing the transverse momentum dependence resulting from the qcd dipole prescription ( [ 5.1 ] ) to the transverse momentum dependent radiation cross sections for @xmath0 and @xmath3 scattering centers , calculated @xcite in time - ordered perturbation theory . in the present subsection , we test the qcd dipole prescription ( [ 5.1 ] ) for the case of @xmath0 scattering . we start from the @xmath0 qed bethe - heitler spectrum ( [ 3.14 ] ) in the form @xmath287 to specify the absolute size of @xmath270 in ( [ 5.1 ] ) , we relate the elastic qed @xmath288-@xmath288 cross section to the corresponding qcd one by @xmath289 where @xmath226 denotes the colour factor , @xmath290 @xmath291 , @xmath292 , @xmath293 , for @xmath6-@xmath6 , @xmath6-@xmath280 , @xmath280-@xmath280 . also , to change to the qcd - case , we replace the coupling to the emitted photon in ( [ 5.5 ] ) by @xmath294 , where the casimir @xmath295 of the adjoint representation accounts for the emitted gluon . with this input , we follow the dipole prescription and substitute ( [ 5.1 ] ) in the bethe - heitler cross section ( [ 5.5 ] ) . after rescaling @xmath143 @xmath296 on both sides of the equation , we find ( note that @xmath297 ) @xmath298 this is the bertsch - gunion radiation spectrum @xcite times the elastic mott cross section for a debye - screened coloured potential . for @xmath0 , the qcd dipole prescription turns to leading order @xmath299 the bethe - heitler qed radiation spectrum _ exactly _ into the bertsch - gunion qcd radiation spectrum . this success does not depend on the particular combination of colour dipoles introduced in ( [ 5.1 ] ) . it is rather due to the scaling property of the dipole size in ( [ 5.5 ] ) : replacing in the argument of @xmath300 the transverse extension @xmath301 modifies both : ( i ) the @xmath177 rapidity distribution of the qed spectrum into the flat rapidity distribution of the qcd spectrum and ( ii ) the characteristic @xmath302-dependence of the qed spectrum into the characterisitc @xmath143-dependence of the qcd radiation spectrum . the interference terms of qcd multiple scattering bremsstrahlung radiation are more complicated than their qed analogue . especially , since the gluon is charged , it can rescatter on additional potentials , and these cascading contributions do not factorize from the gluon production amplitudes . this effect does not exist for the qed bremsstrahlung : there , the only in medium modification of the produced photons is the dielectric suppression which is clearly a final state effect which factorizes from the production amplitude . this qualitatively different structure of qcd rescattering processes makes it interesting to study the accuracy of the qcd dipole prescription for @xmath3 scatterings . to this aim , we compare the @xmath3 radiation spectrum ( [ 3.15 ] ) to the result of the full @xmath3 qcd radiation spectrum calculated in time ordered perturbation theory in ref . @xcite : @xmath303 where @xmath304 , @xmath305 , @xmath306 . equation ( [ 5.8 ] ) is obtained by squaring the amplitude in eq . ( 2.20 ) of ref . @xcite which corresponds to the seven diagrams in fig . we have used the following shorthands : @xmath307 the @xmath3 radiation spectrum ( [ 5.8 ] ) is obtained for the case of two scattering centers placed at _ fixed _ longitudinal positions @xmath308 , @xmath309 with @xmath310 . in contrast , the @xmath3 calculation presented in section [ sec3b ] considers two scattering centers at _ arbitrary _ longitudinal positions distributed according to a homogeneous density @xmath189 within a longitudinal extension @xmath13 . in fact , the interference terms in ( [ 5.8 ] ) depend in a different way on the kinematical variables than the interference terms in ( [ 3.16 ] ) . moreover , we can not compare the @xmath311 limit of both expressions , since ( [ 5.8 ] ) is obtained in time ordered perturbation theory where @xmath312 is used to neglect diagrammatic contributions . this leaves us for a direct comparison of both calculations with only the limiting case @xmath313 which corresponds to two scattering centers at arbitrary large relative distance . one checks that the qcd dipole prescription leads for the @xmath3 rescattering result ( [ 3.26 ] ) in the @xmath314 limit @xmath315 due to the symmetry of the @xmath197- and @xmath198-integrations , one can exchange @xmath316 in ( [ 5.13 ] ) . also , for a direct comparison with the @xmath3 case ( [ 5.12 ] ) , the opacity factor @xmath317 that corresponds to the probability of two scatterings , should be dropped . to discuss the differences between the result ( [ 5.13 ] ) of the qcd dipole prescription and the @xmath3 pqcd result ( [ 5.12 ] ) , we present in figure [ fig3 ] the seven feynman amplitudes contributing to the radiation spectrum ( [ 5.8 ] ) . for each of the diagrams , we denote by @xmath318 the entire contribution , by @xmath319 the part of the contribution whose phase factor depends only on @xmath320 , by @xmath321 the part whose phase factor depends on @xmath320 and @xmath322 , etc . based on calculations reported in ref . @xcite , one finds @xmath323 as can be seen from figure [ fig3 ] , the terms @xmath324 and @xmath325 are the bertsch - gunion radiation contributions off the first and second scattering center respectively . the term @xmath326 corresponds to gluon emission around @xmath320 and rescattering of the gluon at @xmath322 . since it is the gluon and not the quark which scatters off the second coloured potential , the term @xmath326 is enhanced by a factor @xmath327 in ( [ 5.12 ] ) . these three sets of diagrams leading to @xmath324 , @xmath325 and @xmath326 can also be seen to form the building blocks of an effective current in the bdmps - approach , see e.g. fig . 4 of ref . @xcite . = 7.5 cm one might have expected naively that the qcd dipole prescription maps the two bethe - heitler terms of ( [ 3.26 ] ) onto the two bertsch - gunion terms @xmath324 and @xmath325 . this is only the case for the @xmath31-integrated cross section ( i.e. , the energy loss ) if the kinematical boundary @xmath328 is ignored . then , the @xmath31-integration allows to shift @xmath329 which changes @xmath330 in ( [ 5.13 ] ) . the @xmath3 low opacity expansion allows a quantitative check of qed - inspired qcd calculations . the deviation of the limiting case ( [ 5.13 ] ) from the perturbative qcd result is clearly non - negligible : for the @xmath31-integrated case , where the @xmath331 and @xmath332-contributions have the same size , one can read off a correction factor @xmath333 with which the @xmath3 dipole cross section ( [ 5.13 ] ) has to be multiplied to regain the pqcd radiation spectrum . [ in fact , for qcd , the @xmath31-integrals are divergent in the @xmath334 limit due to the collinear singularity that must be regulated by an in - medium screening scale . ] for the @xmath31- differential spectrum or for finite @xmath13 , corrections are clearly more complicated , but the important message is that at least for simple few - rescattering cases , the resulting expressions can be compared to pqcd results and the deviations can be quantified . the fact that the qcd dipole prescription tends to underestimate the full pqcd radiation cross section by a significant amount ( at least for @xmath3 ) may indicate that it is of use as a lower bound for the possible radiative energy loss . in the present work , we have extended the kst - formalism @xcite for quantum electrodynamics in several ways : ( i ) we have supplemented it with a regularization prescription which correctly removes the weizscker - williams fields of the asymptotic states from the radiation spectrum and thus warrants the correct limiting behaviour of the formalism for a set of few - scattering scenarios . ( ii ) we have calculated the corresponding angular integrated energy loss and shown that it implies corrections to zakharov s energy loss formula ( [ 2.47 ] ) . ( iii ) we have derived a properly regularized radiation spectrum in the dipole approximation which allows for a straightforward numerical calculation , as well as for further analytical studies in limiting cases . most importantly , the kst - formalism describes the angular dependence of the radiative energy loss which was shown in section [ sec4 ] to have a very rich non - analytical structure , incorporating intuitive properties of in - medium propagation as e.g. the molire @xmath143-broadening . in the qcd case , the situation is much more complex due to the colour structure and the rescattering of the gluon . we have tested the qcd dipole prescription , used in various previous applications @xcite , against few - scattering pqcd results @xcite . the good news is that this prescription recovers the @xmath0 qcd bertsch - gunion gluon radiation spectrum . for multiple collisions , however , even the angular integrated distributions differ from the exact result by a sizeable factor which approaches 17/8 at large separation . this discrepancy is due to the increase in the effective elastic cross section because both the jet and the gluon undergo multiple scattering . clearly , the qcd problem still needs further work and the present formalism needs to be extended to properly take into account non - abelian features . the introduction of the low opacity expansion in this paper was shown to be a powerful test of any proposed extension of qed calculations to qcd . we thank boris kopeliovich and andreas schfer for several discussions , especially about the problem of regaining the bethe - heitler limit from the radiation spectrum of ref . @xcite . after informing them about the importance of the regularization prescription discussed in section [ sec2b ] , boris kopeliovich noted that alexander tarasov had come to the same conclusion on the basis of earlier calculations of one of us . we also thank peter levai and ivan vitev for many discussions about radiative energy loss calculations in the bdmps - formalism and for sharing with us the unpublished result ( [ 5.8 ] ) whose derivation will appear in @xcite . finally , we thank u. heinz for helpful comments regarding the manuscript . this work was supported by the director , office of energy research , division of nuclear physics of the office of high energy and nuclear physics of the u.s . department of energy under contract no . de - fg-02 - 92er-40764 . in this appendix , we give details of the calculation of in medium averages , used in the derivation of the radiation probability ( [ 2.22 ] ) . we start from a set of @xmath4 static external potentials @xmath335 at positions @xmath336 , @xmath337 the in medium average @xmath338 averages over the elementary scattering centers in a volume of longitudinal extension @xmath339 and transverse radius @xmath340 according to @xmath341 we are interested in the combinations @xmath342 of external potentials appearing in the squared radiation amplitude ( [ 2.18 ] ) , @xmath343 = \bigg\langle \exp\left\ { \sum_{i=1}^n\ , w_i\bigl ( { \bf r},{\bf r}';z',z\bigr ) \right\}\bigg\rangle\ , , \label{a.3 } \\ & & w_i\bigl ( { \bf r},{\bf r}';z',z\bigr ) = \nonumber \\ & & \quad i\int\limits_{z}^{z'}{\it d}\xi\ , \left [ u\bigl({\bf r}-{\bf r}_i,\xi - z_i\bigr ) - u\bigl({\bf r}'-{\bf r}_i,\xi - z_i\bigr ) \right]\ , . \label{a.4 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] with a density @xmath344 of scattering centers ( which is @xmath345 for the homogeneous case ) , the average ( [ a.3 ] ) can be rewritten in the form @xmath346 the notational shorthand @xmath347 introduced here does _ not _ grow linearly with the number of scattering centers @xmath4 . this is crucial for the @xmath348 limit in ( [ a.5 ] ) to work . so far , we have not specified the remaining functional dependence of @xmath347 in ( [ a.6 ] ) . for homogeneous targets of sufficiently large transverse size , it is clear that @xmath347 can only depend on the relative path difference @xmath349 . we now demonstrate for a specific model that @xmath347 takes the form @xmath350 = - \int\limits_{z}^{z ' } { \it d}\xi\ , \sigma\bigl(\xi,\bbox{\rho}(\xi)\bigr)\ , , \label{a.7}\ ] ] where @xmath98 @xmath351 @xmath97 is defined in terms of the so - called dipole cross section @xmath254 and the longitudinal density @xmath25 of scattering centers , see ( [ 2.21 ] ) . the model under consideration is the abelian version of the gyulassy - wang model which takes for the elementary scattering centers in ( [ a.1 ] ) yukawa potentials with debye mass @xmath170 , @xmath352 we have included in the definition of these potentials an extra power in the coupling constant to take the coupling of the potential to the passing electron into account . in the following calculation , we assume that the average range @xmath353 of the potentials @xmath335 is much smaller than the size of the medium , @xmath354 . also , we use that density fluctuations are negligible on the scale @xmath353 . expanding @xmath347 to leading non - vanishing order in the coupling constant @xmath355 , we find @xmath356 \ , , \label{a.9}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath357 the integrals in ( [ a.9 ] ) can be done analytically , leading to zakharov s result @xcite @xmath358 in our study of the @xmath31-dependence of the radiation probability , we shall encounter the fourier transform of @xmath359 $ ] with respect to the transverse momentum transfer @xmath143 from the medium to the electron , @xmath360 for non - vanishing momentum transfer , the first term of ( [ a.12 ] ) is the mott cross - section for electron scattering off the single external potential ( [ a.1 ] ) in the relativistic limit . the size of the prefactor of the @xmath361 contribution is such that the @xmath143-integral over ( [ a.12 ] ) vanishes . this warrants that the dipole cross section @xmath254 vanishes at vanishing dipole size @xmath362 . one can trace back the origin of this second term : in the expansion of ( [ a.4 ] ) to second order in the coupling constant , it arises from contributions which are second order in @xmath363 but zeroth order in @xmath364 , or vice versa . this amounts to multiplying the second order term of @xmath365 with the zeroth order term @xmath366 of the complex conjugated amplitude . the contribution @xmath365 @xmath367 to the radiation cross section vanishes however due to energy momentum conservation . calculating such a contribution from the furry approximation ( [ 2.5 ] ) , ( [ 2.6 ] ) , this energy momentum conservation appears in the form of a @xmath368-function @xmath361 , resulting in an additional contribution to the mott cross section . for a comparison with experimental data , one has to assume a transverse momentum transfer @xmath369 which is always finite but can become arbitrarily small . then the second term in ( [ a.12 ] ) drops out in all physical quantities . in this appendix , we give details of the solutions of the path integrals , used for the derivation of the radiation probability @xmath370 in ( [ 2.22 ] ) . we start from the observation that with the help of the averaging ( [ 2.20 ] ) @xmath371\ , , \label{b.1 } \\ & & \bbox{\hat\rho}(z ) = \bbox{r}(z ) - \bbox{r}'(z)\ , , \qquad \bbox{\bar\rho}(z ) = \bbox{r}(z ) + \bbox{r}'(z)\ , . \label{b.2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , the dot denotes a derivative with respect to the longitudinal direction and the integral @xmath372 is trivial . it results in a @xmath368-function which constrains all possible paths @xmath373 by the mid - point rule to a straight line @xmath374 the final result is @xmath375 \over { 2\ , ( z'-z ) } } \right\}\ , , \label{b.4 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] we note that this ` eikonal path ' @xmath376 does not result from an eikonal approximation . it is rather obtained from a calculation on the cross section level , once the ingoing and outgoing states @xmath57 of ( [ 2.5 ] ) , ( [ 2.6 ] ) are adopted as starting point : the furry approximation is a systematic expansion in @xmath18 and thus closely related to the eikonal approximation . = 8.5 cm the explicit expression ( [ b.4 ] ) allows to simplify the radiation probability ( [ 2.18 ] ) by using @xmath377 % \nonumber \\ % & & \qquad \times & & = - \exp\left\{-i\bbox{p}_{2\perp}\cdot \bbox{\rho}_2 - \int_{z'}^{z_+ } \sigma(\xi,\bbox{\rho}_2)\ , { \it d}\xi\right\}\ , , \label{b.5 } \\ & & \int d{\bf r}_1\ , d{\bf r}'_1\ , e^{i{\bf p}_{1\perp}\cdot ( { \bf r}_1-{\bf r}'_1 ) } s(z,\bbox{r},\bbox{\rho}';z_-,\bbox{r}_1,\bbox{r}'_1|p_1 ) \nonumber \\ % & & = -\int { \it d}\bbox{\rho}_1\ , \ , \ , % \delta^{(2)}\bigl [ \bbox{\rho}_1 - ( \bbox{r}-\bbox{\rho}')\bigr ] % \nonumber \\ % & & \qquad \times & & = - \exp\left\{i\bbox{p}_{1\perp}\cdot \bbox{\rho}_1 - \int_{z_-}^{z } \sigma(\xi,\bbox{\rho}_1)\ , { \it d}\xi\right\}\ , , \label{b.6 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have introduced the coordinates @xmath378 the integrals ( [ b.5 ] ) , ( [ b.6 ] ) depend only on the relative distances @xmath261 , @xmath379 . also , due to the boundary conditions , the path @xmath380 turns out to be @xmath381-independent in ( [ b.5 ] ) and ( [ b.6 ] ) . equation ( [ b.4 ] ) provides an explicit expression for the in - medium average of pairs of green s functions as long as both green s functions are for particles with the same momentum @xmath382 . to calculate the radiation probability ( [ 2.17 ] ) , we have to extend this calculation to the case of two different momenta . to this end , we use the identity @xmath383 where the norm @xmath384 is given in terms of the boundary conditions for the path integral over @xmath385 , @xmath386 this allows us to write @xmath387 \right\}\ , , \label{b.11 } \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath388 and @xmath389 . introducing the new coordinates @xmath390 the exponent of the path integral ( [ b.10 ] ) reads @xmath391 and @xmath342 appears with the argument @xmath392 . in complete analogy to the calculation of ( [ b.4 ] ) , this renders the path integral over @xmath393 trivial and reduces the support of @xmath394 to a straight line . with the choice of boundary conditions ( [ b.9 ] ) , we find @xmath395 \right\ } \nonumber \\ & & \times \int { \cal d}\bbox{r}_b \exp\left\ { \frac{i\mu}{2}\int_z^{z'}\bbox{\dot r}_b^2 - \int_z^{z ' } \sigma\bigl(\xi,\bbox{\hat \rho}_f + x\bbox{r}_b\bigr ) \right\}\ , , % { \cal f}(\bbox{\hat \rho}_f + x\ , \bbox{r}_b)\ , , \label{b.15}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath396 and @xmath397 we can now simplify the radiation probability @xmath370 of ( [ 2.18 ] ) with the help of ( [ b.5 ] ) , ( [ b.6 ] ) and ( [ b.15 ] ) . to this aim , we observe first that with a partial integration , the derivative @xmath398 @xmath399 of the interaction vertex ( [ 2.17 ] ) changes into @xmath400 @xmath401 . then we change to the integration variables @xmath402 the only @xmath403-dependence of the integrand of @xmath370 is in the exponential of the second line of ( [ b.15 ] ) . rewriting this in the new integration variables ( [ b.7 ] ) and ( [ b.17 ] ) , we find @xmath404 \over { 2(z'-z ) } } \right\ } \nonumber\\ & & = \frac{- 8\pi i\ , ( z'-z)}{p\ , x } \exp\left\ { \frac{ip\ , ( 1-x)}{2(z'-z)x } \left(\bbox{\rho}_1-\bbox{\rho}_2\right)^2 \right\}\ , . \label{b.18}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the radiation probability reads now @xmath405 \frac{\partial}{\partial\bbox{\rho}_1 } \cdot % \frac{\partial}{\partial\bbox{\rho}_2}\ , % + 2m_e^2x^2 \right\ } % \nonumber\\ & & \quad \times \widehat{\gamma}_{-{\rho}_1}\ , \widehat{\gamma}_{-{\rho}_2}^*\ , \exp\left\ { \frac{ip\ , ( 1-x)}{2(z'-z)x } \left(\bbox{\rho}_1-\bbox{\rho}_2\right)^2 \right\ } \nonumber \\ & & \quad \times \int { \cal d}\bbox{r}_b\ , \exp\left\ { \frac{i\ , p\ , ( 1-x)\ , x}{2 } \int_z^{z'}\bbox{\dot r}_b^2(\xi)\ , { \it d}\xi \right\ } \nonumber \\ & & \qquad \quad \times \exp\left\ { - \int_z^{z ' } \sigma\bigl(\xi,\bbox{\hat \rho}_f + x\bbox{r}_b\bigr)\ , { \it d}\xi \right\}\ , . \label{b.19}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this is proportional to a transverse area @xmath406 which we devide out in what follows : the corresponding radiation spectrum is given per unit transverse area . the above expression can be simplified further if one observes that @xmath407 after a transformation @xmath408 , and @xmath409 , this allows to combine in ( [ b.19 ] ) the gaussian exponent and the path integral into a new path integral over @xmath410 with boundary conditions @xmath411 the resulting expression is given in ( [ 2.22 ] ) and differs from the result of ref . @xcite by the regularization @xmath412 of the integrand only . the extension of the formalism to spin- and helicity dependent quantities is obtained , by inserting for @xmath413 and @xmath414 in ( [ b.19 ] ) the spin- and helicity dependent vertex functions ( [ 2.15 ] ) and ( [ 2.16 ] ) , rather than the average ( [ 2.17 ] ) . for the case of @xmath415 scatterings , the combined momentum transfer @xmath143 from the medium is desribed by the folding of three elastic mott cross sections @xmath182 , @xmath416 with the shorthands @xmath417 the radiation spectrum ( [ 2.22 ] ) expanded to third order reads @xmath418\ , n^3_0\ , . \label{3.29}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the variables @xmath419 stand again for the longitudinal integrals over phase factors . for a homogeneous medium of density @xmath189 and length @xmath13 they read @xmath420 from this one finds again the simple limiting cases . we confirm the factorization limit @xmath421 and the bethe - heitler limit @xmath422\ , . \label{3.41}\end{aligned}\ ] ] also , we have checked in complete analogy to the case of @xmath3 scatterings that the lowest order correction to the factorization limit ( [ 3.40 ] ) is proportional to @xmath192 times @xmath423 . the @xmath143-integral of this correction diverges logarithmically . this further corroborates the conclusions drawn in subsection [ sec3b ] . landau and i.ya . pomeranchuk , dokl . sssr * 92 * ( 1953 ) 535 , 735 . berestetski , e.m . lifshits and l.p . pitaevski , _ landau course of theoretical physics vol . iv _ , oxford , pergamon press , 1979 . a.b . migdal , phys . rev . * 103 * ( 1956 ) 1811 . bell , nucl . * 8 * ( 1958 ) 613 . s. klein , hep - ph/9802442 , submitted to _ review of modern physics_. m.l . ter - mikaelian , jetp * 25 * ( 1953 ) 289 . slac-146 coll . , p. anthony et al . , phys . * 75 * ( 1995 ) 1949 . slac-146 coll . , p. anthony et al . , phys . d 56 * ( 1997 ) 1373 . slac-146 coll . , p. anthony et al . , phys . * 76 * ( 1996 ) 3550 . r. blankenbecler and s.d . drell , phys . d 53 * ( 1996 ) 6265 . r. blankenbecler , phys . rev . * d55 * 190 . baier and v.m . katkov , phys . rev . * d57 * ( 1998 ) 3146 ; v.n . baier and v.m . katkov , phys . rev . * d59 * ( 1999 ) 056003 . baier and v.m . katkov , hep - ph/9902436 . zakharov , jetp letters * 63 * ( 1996 ) 952 , * 65 * ( 1997 ) 615 . zakharov , hep - ph/9805271 . b.g . zakharov , phys . * 61 * ( 1998 ) 838 [ yad . fiz . * 61 * ( 1998 ) 924 ] , hep - ph/9807540 . r. baier , y.l . dokshitzer , a.h . mueller , s. peign and d. schiff , nucl . phys . * b478 * ( 1996 ) 577 . i.m . dremin and c.s . lam , mod . a13 * ( 1998 ) 2789 . j. knoll and d.n . voskresensky , annals phys . * 249 * ( 1996 ) 532 ; phys . * b351 * ( 1995 ) 43 . m. gyulassy and x .- wang , nucl . b420 * ( 1994 ) 583 . wang , m. gyulassy and m. plmer , phys . rev . * d51 * ( 1995 ) 3436 . r. baier , y.l . dokshitzer , a.h . mueller , s. peign and d. schiff , nucl . phys . * b483 * ( 1997 ) 291 . r. baier , y.l . dokshitzer , a.h . mueller , s. peign and d. schiff , nucl . phys . * b484 * ( 1997 ) 265 . r. baier , y.l . dokshitzer , a.h . mueller and d. schiff , phys . rev . * c58 * ( 1998 ) 1706 . r. baier , y.l . dokshitzer , a.h . mueller and d. schiff , nucl . phys . * b531 * ( 1998 ) 403 . kopeliovich , a. schfer and a.v . tarasov , phys . * c59 * ( 1999 ) 1609 . kopeliovich , j. raufeisen and a.v . tarasov , phys . * b440 * ( 1998 ) 151 . j. raufeisen , a.v . tarasov and o.o . voskrenskaya , hep - ph/9812398 , eur . j. c in press . nikolaev and b.g . zakharov , jetp * 78 * ( 1994 ) 598 . c. itzykson and j .- b . zuber , _ quantum field theory _ , new york , mcgraw - hill , 1985 . zakharov , sov . * 46 * ( 1987 ) 92 . brodsky , a. hebecker , and e. quack , phys . * d55 * ( 1997 ) 2584 . m. gyulassy , p. levai and i. vitev , hep - ph/9907461 . y .- s . tsai , rev . * 46 * ( 1974 ) 815 . gunion and g. bertsch , phys . * d25 * ( 1982 ) 746 . Abstract:
[ "we study the transverse momentum dependence of the landau - pomeranchuk - migdal effect in qed , starting from the high energy expansion of the solution of the dirac equation in the presence of an external field . the angular integrated energy loss formula differs from an earlier expression of zakharov by taking finite kinematical boundaries into account . in an expansion in powers of the opacity of the medium , we derive explicit expressions for the radiation cross section associated with @xmath0 , @xmath1 and @xmath2 scatterings . we verify the bethe - heitler and the factorization limit , and we calculate corrections to the factorization limit proportional to the square of the target size . a closed form expression valid to arbitrary orders in the opacity is derived in the dipole approximation . the resulting radiation spectrum is non - analytic in the coupling constant which is traced back to the transverse momentum broadening of a hard parton undergoing multiple small angle molire scattering . in extending the results to qcd , we test a previously used dipole prescription by comparing to direct pqcd results for @xmath0 and @xmath1 . for @xmath0 , the qcd dipole prescription reproduces exactly the bertsch - gunion radiation spectrum . for @xmath3 , we find a sizeable correction which reduces to a multiplicative factor 17/8 at large separation ." ]
13,539
13,539
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the obscuring effects of dust and high stellar density in the milky way have historically prevented the detection of galaxies that lie behind the disk of our galaxy . this zone of avoidance ( zoa ) typically comprises more than 20% of the optical extragalactic sky and nearly 10% of the infrared extragalactic sky , although recent surveys have begun to lessen its extent . the presence of the zoa does not affect extragalactic population studies , as galaxies in the highly obscured zoa should not differ from those detected in regions of low obscuration . a complete census of galaxies across the galactic plane is necessary , however , to fully understand the dynamics of the local group as well as the large - scale structure of the local universe . many early zoa studies focused on finding a highly obscured , nearby , massive galaxy . several such galaxies have been found , including maffei 1 and 2 ( maffei 1968 ) , circinus ( freeman et al . 1977 ) , and dwingeloo 1 ( kraan - korteweg et al . 1994 ) . while the ic 342/maffei group and other nearby massive galaxies largely define the motion of the local group , the direction of the local group acceleration is strongly affected by the full zoa mass distribution out to 6000 km s@xmath5 ( kolatt , dekel , & lahav 1995 ) , and possibly beyond . several attempts have been made in recent years to sample the zoa more completely . optical galaxy candidates have been identified by searches of the palomar observatory sky survey ( poss ) prints and schmidt atlases ( see kraan - korteweg & lahav 2000 for a review ) . highly obscured galaxies have also been detected in the near - infrared ( nir ) and far - infrared by the deep near - infrared survey of the southern sky ( denis ; schrder , kraan - korteweg , & mamon 1999 ) , the two micron all sky survey ( 2mass ; jarrett et al . 2000 ) , and the infrared astronomical satellite sky survey ( iras , e.g. nakanishi et al . 1997 ) . while useful in reducing the size of the zoa , optical and infrared surveys are ultimately limited by galactic extinction and source confusion . the most thorough optical searches are complete to an apparent diameter of @xmath9 and a magnitude of b@xmath10 at extinctions of @xmath11 ( kraan - korteweg 2000 , woudt & kraan - korteweg 2001 ) . the dirbe/_iras _ 100 @xmath12 m extinction maps ( schlegel , finkbeiner , & davis 1998 ) directly measure the dust column density and indicate that @xmath13 for 9.5% of the sky , although the data in the galactic plane are not yet well - calibrated . the completeness of infrared surveys of the zoa is affected primarily by source confusion . results from the denis survey indicate that nir surveys can easily detect galaxies down to @xmath14 mag , and the brighter ones far beyond ( schrder et al . the 2mass survey is expected to be complete to @xmath15 at 2.2 @xmath12 m for the majority of the sky , but for @xmath16 , this completeness drops to @xmath17 ( jarrett et al . 2000 ) . hi emission is not affected by the dust in the milky way . consequently , blind hi surveys provide a unique means by which to identify gas - rich zoa galaxies . the first blind zoa hi survey was conducted by henning ( 1992 ) using the green bank 300-ft telescope . more recent blind hi surveys include the arecibo dual beam survey ( adbs , rosenberg & schneider 2000 ) and the arecibo hi strip survey ( ahiss , zwaan et al . 1997 ) , which intersect with but do not focus on the zoa . the first systematic hi survey to focus on the optically most opaque part of the zoa is the dwingeloo obscured galaxies survey ( henning et al . 1998 , rivers 2000 ) which sampled the northern zoa ( @xmath18 , @xmath19 ) to velocities of 4000 km s@xmath5 in the local group standard of rest with an rms of 40 mjy beam@xmath5 . each of these surveys has contributed to our understanding of gas - rich galaxies and the structure of the local universe , but all have been limited in either sensitivity or sky coverage . the 21-cm multibeam receiver ( staveley - smith et al . 1996 ) on the parkes 64-m telescope is the first instrument capable of conducting both sensitive _ and _ large - area blind hi surveys in a reasonable time . two multibeam surveys commenced in 1997 . the hi parkes all - sky survey ( hipass , see meyer et al . 2004 ) is a blind hi survey of the sky south of @xmath20 and has an rms noise of 13 mjy beam@xmath5 . the hi parkes zone of avoidance survey is a more sensitive ( rms = 6 mjy beam@xmath5 ) survey of the region of the milky way accessible from parkes ( @xmath21 to @xmath1 , @xmath22 ) . an analysis of shallower data for the southern zoa ( rms = 15 mjy beam@xmath5 , @xmath23 to @xmath24 ) led to the discovery of 110 galaxies , 67 of which were previously unknown ( henning et al . here we report on the results for the complementary region north of dec . @xmath25 ( @xmath0 to @xmath1 and @xmath2 to @xmath3 ) . the results reported here are , however , at full survey sensitivity ( rms = 6 mjy beam@xmath5 ) . although this region overlaps with the dwingeloo survey , the parkes survey is much more sensitive and represents the first probe , beyond a few mpc , of this region of the universe , which lies near both the local and microscopium voids . data of similar depth for the remainder of the zoa ( @xmath26 to @xmath24 ) will be reported elsewhere . in 2 , we describe the observations and the method by which the data were reduced . the galaxy search method , measurement of hi parameters , search results , and survey completeness are discussed in 3 . in 4 , we describe the results of a search for multiwavelength counterparts to the survey galaxies . the large - scale structures revealed by the survey are discussed in 5 , and the mass function of the galaxies is discussed in 6 . throughout the paper , we assume @xmath27 km s@xmath5 mpc@xmath5 . the observations for the northern extension of the hi parkes zoa survey began in 2000 october and were completed in 2002 may . the data were taken at the parkes 64-m telescope using the 21-cm multibeam receiver , which consists of an array of 13 beams each with two orthogonal linear polarizations and an average beamwidth of @xmath28 ( fwhm ) . the multibeam correlator has a bandwidth of 64 mhz and covers the velocity range @xmath29 km s@xmath5 . the channel spacing is 13.2 km s@xmath5 and the average system temperature is 20k . the northern zoa region referred to in this paper lies at declinations @xmath30 and is divided into four fields , each approximately @xmath31 , as shown in figure 1 . each field was scanned 425 times , with a single @xmath32 scan covering a region @xmath33 wide in eight minutes . the central beam for all scans lies along a line of constant galactic latitude , with each of the 425 scans being separated by 14 in latitude . at the midpoint of each scan , the feed angle is @xmath34 with respect to the scan direction so that all 13 beams lie at different latitudes in a minimally redundant fashion . the total integration time is 2100 s beam@xmath5 . the median rms noise of the four fields after hanning smoothing is 6.0 mjy beam@xmath5 . the data were bandpass - corrected , doppler - corrected , and calibrated using aips++ livedata ( barnes et al . gridding was performed by gridzilla , using a top - hat median gridding algorithm with a top - hat radius of 6@xmath35 ( barnes et al . the resulting pixel and beam sizes are @xmath36 and @xmath37 , respectively . spectral ringing associated with galactic hi emission and the baseline ripple associated with strong continuum emission were respectively removed or suppressed using hanning smoothing and the scaled template method ( see barnes et al . hanning smoothing increases the velocity resolution to 27 km s@xmath5 . several sources of extraneous signal remained after standard processing . residual baseline ripples caused by continuum radio sources are the most prominent . hydrogen recombination lines at 1424.734 mhz ( h166@xmath38 ) , 1399.368 mhz ( h167@xmath38 ) , and 1374.601 mhz ( h168@xmath38 ) appear at velocities of cz=-911 km s@xmath5 , 4507 km s@xmath5 , and 9990 km s@xmath5 , respectively . interference from the l3 beacon of the gps near 1380 mhz ( 8778 km s@xmath5 ) is also present . these sources of interference can generally be identified by their characteristic frequencies and widths . in the case of recombination lines , they are accompanied by continuum emission from their underlying hii regions . the four hanning - smoothed data cubes were visualized using kview in the software package karma ( gooch 1995 ) and were searched by eye ; the strong residual baseline ripples prevented the use of automatic galaxy - finding software . the galaxy search was conducted over the full velocity range , @xmath39 km s@xmath5 , although confusion from galactic emission prevented a complete survey of the region with @xmath40 km s@xmath5 . all possible planes , ra - dec , ra - velocity , and dec - velocity were examined by three independent parties and a final galaxy list was decided upon by a fourth author . the coordinates and spectral characteristics of each galaxy were measured using the program mbspect in the software package miriad ( sault , teuben , & wright 1995 ) . the galaxy positions were determined by spatially fitting a gaussian to the velocity - integrated emission of each galaxy . we subsequently used this position in the spectral analysis , where the weighted sum of the emission in each velocity plane was used to form the spectral profile . the total flux was measured by integrating the flux over the galaxy profile . the systemic velocity was taken to be the midpoint of the profile at 50% of the peak flux . the widths at 20% and 50% of the peak flux density were measured using a width - maximizing technique . due to the large hanning - smoothed velocity resolution of 27 km s@xmath5 , the velocity widths we measure are broader than the intrinsic widths of the galaxies . the velocity widths at the 20% and 50% peak flux levels were therefore corrected by 21 and 14 km s@xmath5 , respectively ( see henning et al . 2000 ) . if the hi emission showed no evidence of extension or confusion , we analyzed a region 28@xmath35 around the galaxy . for seven of the galaxies , a narrower box of width 12@xmath35 or 20@xmath35 was used to isolate the galaxy emission from that arising from a neighboring galaxy , which may have led to an underestimation of the total flux . while no galaxies in our survey are clearly extended , we did identify one galaxy that is possibly extended or confused , j1912 + 02 . the spectral fitting for this galaxy was conducted by summing the emission over a @xmath41 box . the position was fit over a smaller @xmath42 box . where possible , a first - order baseline was fit to each profile . for approximately half of the galaxies , however , baseline ripples made a first - order fit unrealistic ; for these galaxies , we used the lowest order baseline that gave a reasonable fit . the distance to each galaxy , @xmath43 , was calculated using its velocity in the local group standard of rest , @xmath44 sin@xmath45 cos@xmath46 . the hi mass was determined using @xmath47 = 2.36\times10^{5 } d^{2 } f_{\rm hi}$ ] , where @xmath48 is the distance in mpc and @xmath49 is the integrated hi flux in jy km s@xmath5 . to estimate the errors on the hi parameters , we conducted a set of simulations . each galaxy profile was first smoothed using a savitzky - golay smoothing filter ( press et al . 1992 , sec . this least - squares polynomial filter reduces noise while better retaining the higher - order characteristics of the spectrum than traditional smoothing techniques . fifty simulated spectra were then created for each galaxy by adding random poisson noise to the smoothed galaxy spectrum ; the rms of this random noise was set equal to that of the original galaxy spectrum . the errors on the hi parameters were then taken to be the median absolute offsets between the parameters of the 50 simulated spectra , as measured by mbspect , and those of the smoothed galaxy profile . the median errors on the peak and integrated flux for the entire sample of galaxies are approximately 9% and 4% , respectively . the median error on the systemic velocity is 3 km s@xmath5 and the median errors on the 50% and 20% velocity widths are 8 km s@xmath5 and 10 km s@xmath5 , respectively . we note that the error we quote for the integrated flux does not take into account the uncertainty due to baseline subtraction or the uncertainty in calibration ; the total errors on the integrated flux are likely to be @xmath50 10 - 15% . we further discuss this method and the dependence of the estimated errors on s / n in appendix a. 77 definite or probable galaxies were detected , 35 in the @xmath0 to @xmath1 region and 42 in the @xmath2 to @xmath3 region . because adjacent data cubes extend slightly beyond the @xmath31 boundaries and overlap in galactic longitude , 5 galaxies were initially detected twice . of these , the detection located within the well defined @xmath31 region of a cube was chosen for the final list . the hi properties of the 77 galaxies are presented in table 1 . the hi spectra of a subset of the sample are shown in figure 2 ; the complete set of spectra is available in the electronic edition of the journal . the set of dotted lines nearest the galaxy spectrum defines the region in which the galaxy profile was measured . a second set of more widely spaced dotted lines indicate the region over which the baseline was fit . if no second set is present , the baseline fit was applied to the entire region displayed . all velocities are given in the optical convention , @xmath51 . for several galaxies , a highly variable baseline prevents a convincing spectrum from being attained although the galaxy is clearly present in the data cube . as an example , consider j0623 + 14 , a galaxy that was detected despite its superposition on one of the most extreme ripples that remain in the survey data . coincidentally , j0623 + 14 has previously been observed by arecibo in an hi follow - up survey of weinberger galaxies ( pantoja et al . despite the extremely poor baseline we observe , our hi parameters are in satisfactory agreement with the arecibo hi parameters . the arecibo flux is higher than what we detect by 14% and the peak flux density is lower by 22% . the most significant difference between our hi properties and those derived from the arecibo observation is the 50% velocity width ; we measure a value of 286 km s@xmath5 whereas pantoja et al . measure 411 km s@xmath5 . the identification of confused and marginally extended galaxies in our sample is difficult . we expect most normal galaxies to be unresolved in the parkes beam at the typical distances in this survey , although confusion in the parkes beam is not unlikely . the hi profile is the best indicator of a confused signal , although a profile can be intrinsically asymmetric , and minor contributions to the hi profile often do not disturb the profile greatly . a possible confusion in the detection can be confirmed by the relative positions and distances of the potential optical and ir counterparts , although background galaxies and hi - poor counterparts make this difficult , as does the high extinction in the zoa . the unambiguous identification of confused galaxies can therefore only be made by high - resolution follow - up observations . the mass distribution of the survey galaxies is shown in figure 3 . the hi masses range from @xmath52 to @xmath53 , with a mean mass of @xmath54 . the distributions of velocities in the local group ( solid line ) and heliocentric ( dotted line ) standards of rest are shown in figure 4 . by using the local group standard of rest , we remove the effect of the milky way s velocity within the local group from our velocity and distance determinations . as we are interested in large - scale structures outside of the local group , we feel that this is the more appropriate standard of rest . both the velocities in the local group and heliocentric standards of rest have been plotted in figure 4 , however , for comparison . distinct peaks can be seen at local group standard of rest velocities near 3250 km s@xmath5 , 4750 km s@xmath5 , and 6750 km s@xmath5 in the @xmath0 to @xmath1 region which seem to be due to filaments crossing the galactic plane at those velocities ( see also fig . the first of these peaks seems to be due to the boundary of the local void . the velocity distribution for the @xmath2 to @xmath3 region seems smoother overall , except for the curious gap around 4500 km s@xmath5 . as will be discussed in 5 , this structure may be due to the wall of the canis major void . of the 77 galaxies detected in this survey , three have systemic velocities of @xmath55 km s@xmath5 . the newly detected galaxy hizoa j0630 + 08 ( @xmath6 = 203.1,0.9 ) has a velocity of only @xmath56 km s@xmath5 ( see table 1 ) and could be a high velocity cloud , though its isolation and relative compactness suggest it is more likely a nearby dwarf galaxy . the galactic extinction towards this galaxy is @xmath57 mag ( schlegel et al . hizoa j0630 + 08 may be part of the orion group ( giovanelli & haynes 1981 ) whose known members are the orion dwarf ( @xmath6 = 200.6 , 12.3 ) , the irregular galaxy 0554 + 07 ( @xmath6 = 200.0 , 8.4 ) , the dwarf irregular galaxy cgcg 422003 ( @xmath6 = 198.8 , 12.2 ) and ugc 03303 ( @xmath6 = 198.6 , 16.9 ) . their velocities are cz = 365 , 411 , 441 and 521 km s@xmath5 , respectively ( giovanelli 1979 , giovanelli & haynes 1981 , michel & huchra 1988 , thuan & seitzer 1979 ) . karachentsev & musella ( 1996 ) give distances of @xmath58 mpc ( orion dwarf ) and @xmath59 mpc ( 0554 + 07 ) assuming galactic extinctions of 2.7 and 2.9 mag , respectively . at a distance of 6 mpc the hi mass of hizoa j0630 + 08 would be @xmath60 . further investigations of the orion group and surroundings are under way . in addition to hizoa j0630 + 08 , we detect two other nearby galaxies , hizoa j1940 + 11 and hizoa j1914 + 10 , with systemic velocities of 580 km s@xmath5 and 654 km s@xmath5 , respectively . for hizoa j1914 + 10 we derive an hi mass of @xmath61 m@xmath62 . this galaxy was previously detected in the dwingeloo obscured galaxies survey and is known as dw044.80.5 ( henning et al . 1998 , rivers 2000 ) . the galactic extinction in this direction is extremely high , preventing detection of optical or infrared counterparts . for hizoa j1940 + 11 , a newly cataloged galaxy , we derive an hi mass of only @xmath63 m@xmath62 . confirmation of this hi detection would be desirable as it is very weak and found at the edge of our survey field . the galactic extinction in this direction is @xmath64 mag ( schlegel et al . both hizoa j1940 + 11 and hizoa j1914 + 10 appear isolated , in contrast to hizoa j0630 + 08 , and lie in the outskirts of the local void . our ability to detect a galaxy in the survey depends on both its integrated flux and velocity width . a galaxy with a high total flux and a small to moderate velocity width can be identified most easily ; decreasing a galaxy s flux or increasing its velocity width would generally make detection more difficult . this , and previous experience with hi surveys ( e.g. kilborn et al . 2002 ) , leads us to expect the survey to be approximately mean flux limited , where mean flux is defined here to be the integrated flux divided by the 20% velocity width ( or the 50% velocity width in cases where the 20% width is not available ) . this expectation is confirmed by plotting the number of survey galaxies with a given flux , @xmath65 , where @xmath66 is defined to be the mean , integrated , or peak flux density . we find that @xmath65 declines most steeply at low fluxes , and therefore best defines the flux cutoff , when the flux is taken to be the mean flux density . a plot of @xmath65 against @xmath66 is shown in fig.5 , with @xmath66 representing the mean flux density as above . it is consistent with a euclidean power law , @xmath67 , and a mean flux density completeness limit of 0.022 jy , assuming approximate spatial homogeneity . the best - fit linear relationship between the mean flux density and peak flux density of galaxies in the survey has a slope of 0.75 . the above completeness limit therefore corresponds roughly to a peak flux density completeness limit of 0.029 jy , which is @xmath68 above the rms noise of the survey , 6.0 mjy . in figure 6 , we plot as a solid histogram the area of the survey , @xmath69 , at or below a given rms noise , @xmath66 . the number of galaxies detected at or below a given rms noise is also given as a dotted histogram . we conservatively define the effective area of the survey to be the area with an rms noise at or below 0.0073 jy , 239 deg@xmath70 . inside this area , the limiting mean flux density of the survey , 0.022 jy , corresponds to a 3@xmath71 , or higher , detection ( corresponding to 5@xmath71 , or higher , in peak flux density ) . this area is less than the nominal survey area of @xmath72 deg@xmath73 partly because of edge effects , and partly because of the increased continuum ( particularly residual continuum ripple ) along the galactic plane . to investigate the effect of the variable rms , we divide the survey into three regions of equal area , but of different rms noise . we again plot @xmath65 against @xmath66 for each of the three regions and fit the differential number counts with a euclidean power law . we estimate completeness limits of 0.019 , 0.020 and 0.026 jy for the regions of low , medium , and high rms noise , respectively . as expected , the completeness limit increases with rms noise . however , the variation is sufficiently limited that , for the present purposes , a mean completeness limit of 0.022 jy adequately characterizes the survey . finally , it is worth noting that , in addition to good completeness above a mean flux density of 0.022 jy , this survey is expected to be highly reliable . galaxy identifications were made by three authors independently , and the final galaxy list was made by a fourth author in a conservative manner , guided by experience gained from follow - up observations of surveys with similar noise characteristics ( henning et al . 2000 , zwaan et al . we expect that very few , if any , of the new galaxies presented here will be false detections , and therefore the reliability of the catalog to be close to 100% . ultimately , however , follow - up hi observations of some weaker objects will be required to ensure that no false detections remain . the region of sky covered by the northern zoa survey overlaps slightly with a number of other surveys . these include four blind hi surveys , the arecibo dual beam survey ( adbs ; rosenberg & schneider 2000 ) , the pilot nrao 300-ft telescope survey ( henning 1992 ) , the dwingeloo obscured galaxy survey ( dogs ; henning et al . 1998 , rivers 2000 ) , and the hi parkes zone of avoidance shallow survey ( hizss ; henning et al . 2000 ) , although the overlap with the hizss is extremely small . this region also coincides with a number of hi follow - up surveys and several optical surveys , from which the zoag ( see lercher , kerber , & weinberger 1996 ) , cgmw ( see roman , iwata , & saito 2000 ) , wein ( weinberger 1980 ) , and additional catalogs have been compiled . significant infrared coverage of these regions has been provided by iras and 2mass . we searched for hi , optical , and infrared counterparts to the northern zoa galaxies using two methods . we first used the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) , the 2mass extended source catalog ( xsc ) , and the iras point source catalog ( psc ) to conduct an automated search for the _ nearest _ potential counterparts to each hi galaxy . the fraction of these counterparts likely to be associated with the hi galaxies was estimated by a simulation , described in appendix b. our second approach was to determine the most likely counterparts by searching for and visually inspecting all potential optical and infrared counterparts , including ( 1 ) counterparts located further from the hi position than those chosen by our previous search and ( 2 ) previously unidentified galaxies in the digitized sky survey ( dss ) poss - ii near - infrared , red , and blue images . any galaxy visible in the dss bands was classified by us as an optical detection . the visual search is , of course , subject to error ; we have tried to minimize this error by having multiple authors participate in the choice of counterparts . previous investigations of the offset between parkes hi sources and their counterparts ( see juraszek et al . 2000 , koribalski et al . 2004 , ryan - weber et al . 2002 ) indicate that while most counterparts are found within @xmath74 , offsets as high as @xmath75 are not highly unusual . a conservative search radius of 10@xmath35 was used for the initial searches to ensure that no potential counterparts were missed . of the 77 galaxies detected here , 20 have been detected previously in hi . we have detected all galaxies from the adbs , nrao 300-ft , hizss , and dogs blind hi surveys that lie in our survey region , although j0635 + 11 was resolved into two galaxies separated by @xmath76 by the adbs . we have also detected several galaxies from follow - up hi surveys . figure 7 illustrates the difference between our measured systemic hi velocities and the hi velocities given by ned as well as the fractional differences in flux between our survey and measurements in the literature ( rosenberg & schneider 2000 , pantoja et al . 1997 , pantoja et al . 1994 , theureau et al . 1998 , henning et al . 2000 , rivers 2000 ) . the distribution of velocity offsets has a mean of @xmath77 km s@xmath5 and a dispersion of 19 km s@xmath5 . the flux we measure is offset by an average of -16% from the values in the literature , with a dispersion of 32% . the galaxies with the largest positive and negative flux offsets are hizoa j0654 + 08 and hizoa j0622 + 11b , respectively . both were previously observed as part of the arecibo dual beam survey . the small adbs flux for hizoa j0622 + 11b can potentially be explained by the fact that adbs flux measurements were underestimated if the source was offset from the beam center ( see rosenberg and schneider 2000 ) . we are confident in our fits to both galaxies , and are unable to explain the large positive flux offset of hizoa j0654 + 08 . two of the remaining galaxies for which our flux is significantly higher than that in the literature were identified by the dwingeloo obscured galaxies survey . both have strong clean profiles . the discrepancies in flux most likely arise from the conservative way in which the dwingeloo galaxy fluxes were measured ( rivers ( 2000 ) defined the total integrated flux to be the flux inside the @xmath78 @xmath79 contour ) . also , as the dwingeloo fluxes were measured from vla maps , any extended emission would have been missed by the interferometer . we present in table 2 the hi counterparts from other surveys of the zoa galaxies , along with the most likely optical , 2mass , and iras counterparts . for the latter group , we include only those sources that were visually verified to be likely counterparts . potential counterparts were discarded from this list if they did not appear to be a galaxy , were offset from the hi position by a statistically unlikely amount ( @xmath80 ) , or were of an unlikely galaxy type . in seven cases , the 2mass counterpart that was chosen by the visual inspection was not the counterpart closest to the hi position . all likely optical and iras counterparts ( excluding the dss galaxies which were not found via the automated ned search ) were the counterparts nearest the hi position . in table 3 , we give the positions of the newly detected dss counterparts . the spatial distribution of sources with multiwavelength counterparts is shown in figure 8 , where solid circles represent galaxies with both optical and infrared counterparts , solid triangles represent galaxies with optical counterparts only , and solid stars represent galaxies with infrared counterparts only . hi galaxies with no counterparts are given as crossed open circles . we have overlaid contours of e(b - v ) on figure 8 using the dirbe / iras data . contour values of @xmath81 and @xmath82 were used for the @xmath0 to @xmath1 region , whereas values of @xmath83 and @xmath84 were used for the contours of the @xmath2 to @xmath3 region . @xmath85{donley.fig8a.eps } & \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.30]{donley.fig8b.eps } \end{array}$ ] in summary , 19 of our 77 galaxies have likely optical counterparts , 27 have likely 2mass counterparts , and 11 have likely iras counterparts . in addition , 16 galaxies have likely optical dss counterparts that are previously uncatalogued . the percentage of counterparts found via the automated search that were still considered likely after a visual verification is roughly consistent with the expected percentages calculated by means of the simulations discussed in appendix b. the spatial distribution of galaxies in our survey can be found in figures 9 through 12 . in figures 9 and 11 , the hi galaxies detected in our survey are given by solid points . we have plotted as open points all galaxies in the lyon - meudon extragalactic database ( leda ) with known velocities . in each velocity - slice , the galaxies with the lowest velocities are represented by triangles ; medium and high velocity galaxies are plotted as squares and circles , respectively . the dotted box outlines the region sampled by our survey . in the cone diagrams of figures 10 and 12 , the hi galaxies are plotted as solid circles and leda galaxies are plotted as open circles . the survey region is again defined by dotted lines . the velocities in figures 9 , 10 , 11 , and 12 have been converted to the local group standard of rest . void parameters are taken from fairall ( 1998 ) and are given in table 4 . the @xmath0 to @xmath1 region lies near several voids , including the local , microscopium , and cygnus voids . at first glance it appears that the galaxies detected in our survey may define the edge of the local and/or microscopium voids , but we caution that preliminary results from the full zoa survey indicate that the number of galaxies rises slightly as one moves from our survey region towards the local and microscopium voids before dropping off at galactic longitudes of @xmath86 . lcc j0622 + 11a & 06 21 59.4 & + 11 18 38 + j0634 + 09 & 06 34 04.9 & + 09 12 55 + j0635 + 11 & 06 35 54.6 & + 11 08 10 + j0641 + 01 & 06 41 04.4 & + 01 50 24 + j0659 + 06 & 06 59 38.1 & + 06 27 19 + j0702 + 03 & 07 02 50.4 & + 03 11 14 + j1853 + 09 & 18 53 47.5 & + 09 51 16 + j1917 + 07 & 19 17 24.8 & + 07 49 07 + j1927 + 09 & 19 27 49.5 & + 09 27 32 + j1929 + 08 & 19 29 19.9 & + 08 02 42 + j1930 + 12 & 19 30 32.2 & + 12 11 41 + lrrrr[t ! ] aquarius void & 60 & -41 & 4500 & 1500 + canis major void & 229 & -13 & 5000 & 2500 + capricornus void & 2 & -17 & 8500 & @xmath87 + cor bor void & 58 & 37 & 5200 & 2000 + cygnus void & 67 & -9 & 3500 & 1250 + delphinus void & 59 & -6 & 2500 & 1500 + gemini void & 172 & 9 & 3000 & @xmath88 + local void & 18 & 6 & 1500 & 1500 + microscopium void & 10 & 1 & 4500 & 1750 + orion void & 206 & -2 & 1500 & 750 + taurus void & 167 & -29 & 4000 & @xmath89 + when visualized including even larger areas ( not shown here ) , the nearby detected galaxies that produce the distinct peak around 3000 km s@xmath5 appear to be the smooth continuation of the sine - wave like feature that can be traced across the whole southern sky ( kraan - korteweg , koribalski , & juraszek 1999 ) . this wave feature crosses the milky way in puppis and continues towards the antlia , hydra , and centaurus structures before folding back across the galactic plane in a structure called the centaurus wall by fairall ( 1998 ) . this wave encircles the local void while crossing the zoa for a third time towards the region inspected here . the second peak in the velocity distribution around 4500 km s@xmath5 also seems to be due to a clear filament present in both the middle panel of figure 9 as well as the redshift cones of figure 10 . here , the detected galaxies seem to divide the microscopium and cygnus / delphinus voids , the latter two of which are likely to form one void rather than two distinct voids . there are several large - scale structures in the vicinity of the @xmath2 to @xmath3 region , which lies between the perseus - pisces supercluster and the puppis filament . two of the nearest newly - detected galaxies , hizoa j0700 + 01 and hizoa j0705 + 02 , are found within 4.8 and 4.9 mpc of the center of the orion void . this void ( @xmath90 km s@xmath5 ) was previously thought to have a radius of 750 km s@xmath5 , or 10 mpc ( fairall 1998 ) . the leda database , however , contains 42 galaxies that lie between 5 mpc and 10 mpc of the void center , and two that lie at smaller radii ( 4.6 and 4.9 mpc ) . it therefore appears that the true radius of this void is approximately 5.0 mpc and that the two galaxies detected here lie along its edge . the galaxies between 2500 and 5500 km s@xmath5 seem to provide the border of two voids , the gemini void , now quite prominent in the upper panel of figure 11 , and the canis major void , which now seems slightly smaller and centered at higher latitudes ( @xmath91 km s@xmath5 ) as compared to its location as given by fairall 1998 ( @xmath92 km s@xmath5 ) . the distinct gap between 4000 and 5000 km s@xmath5 in the velocity distribution ( fig . 4 ) is due to the fact that the continuous part of the border of the canis major void between 4000 and 5000 km s@xmath5 falls just outside of our survey regions and crosses the zoa at quite constant velocities . @xmath85{donley.fig13a.eps } & \includegraphics[angle=270,scale=0.30]{donley.fig13b.eps } \end{array}$ ] llllll @xmath93 & @xmath94 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & @xmath97 & @xmath98 + modified @xmath93 & @xmath99 & @xmath100 & @xmath101 & @xmath102 & + over the past several years , a number of attempts have been made to better define the hi mass function . most recently , the hipass bright galaxy catalog ( bgc , zwaan et al . 2003 ) and the adbs ( rosenberg & schneider 2002 ) have been utilized . prior to these surveys , which cataloged 1000 and 265 galaxies , respectively , the hipass scc ( kilborn 2000 ) , the hipass hizss ( henning et al . 2000 ) , and the ahiss ( zwaan et al . 1997 ) provided the best estimates to the mass function . the sensitivity and coverage of our survey do not allow us to estimate the mass function any more precisely than these recent measurements , especially at the low - mass end where the slope of the mass function is most uncertain . determining the mass function is still of interest , however , as it allows an investigation of the comparative mass density and distribution of galaxies in our survey region , as well as a rough comparison with previous estimations . we calculate the hi mass function in two ways , the standard @xmath103 method ( schmidt 1968 ) and a refined @xmath93 method ( saunders et al . the latter incorporates the density profile of the galaxies into the calculation to reduce the effect of clustering and large - scale structure . the standard @xmath93 method non - parametrically determines the mass function by weighting each galaxy s mass by the inverse of the maximum volume in which it could be detected by the survey . this method , however , is potentially affected by large - scale structure , as it assumes that the galaxy population has a homogeneous distribution . the saunders et al . method is able to remove the majority of the effects of large - scale structure by first using a maximum likelihood technique to determine the radial density distribution of the sample , @xmath104 . this density profile is used to define an effective volume , @xmath105 , which replaces @xmath106 in the @xmath93 method . in both cases , the resulting mass function can be fit by a schechter ( 1976 ) function : @xmath107 the hi mass function can be found in figure 13 , where the data points from the standard @xmath93 method are given by circles and the fit by a solid line . the modified @xmath93 method is represented by triangular points and a dashed line . for comparison , the hi mass function determined from the bgc has been included on the plot , as a dotted line . only those galaxies with a mean flux above our completeness limit of 0.022 jy were included in the mass function calculation . a bin size of 0.5 dex was used for both techniques . for the standard @xmath93 method , the points are plotted at the mean mass of the galaxies in each bin . missing points indicate that we detect no galaxies in that bin . for the modified @xmath93 , the points represent the middle of the mass bin . the galaxy j0635 + 11 , which was resolved into two galaxies by the adbs , does not affect our mass function , as its mean mass falls below our cutoff . for a discussion on the effects of confusion on hi mass functions , see zwaan et al . ( 2003 ) . the schechter parameters from the two methods as well as the derived hi mass densities can be found in table 5 . the two methods give similar mass functions , suggesting that large - scale structure in these regions does not strongly affect the calculation of the mass function . the largest deviation between the two methods occurs at the high - mass end , where the standard method is in better agreement with the bgc mass function than the modified method . in addition , the standard @xmath93 method gives a @xmath108 of @xmath109 , indicating that spatial inhomogeneity will not affect the results greatly . both methods of estimating the mass function give a function that falls below that of the bgc at the low mass end , with the largest discrepancy coming from an underdensity of galaxies of mass @xmath110 . this offset may be due to an underdensity of mass in the regions examined . zwaan et al . ( 2003 ) have shown that the four quadrants of the bgc give mass functions with similar values of @xmath111 but with varying slopes and normalizations with a degree of variation similar to what we observe between our mass function and that derived from the bgc . we also include in figure 13 a plot of the mass functions for the two separate survey regions . the @xmath0 to @xmath1 region is given by circular points and a solid line . the @xmath2 to @xmath3 region is given by triangles and a dashed line . due to the low number of galaxies , these mass functions are not highly reliable , but can still be used for general comparison purposes . the mass function for the @xmath2 to @xmath3 region fits the bgc mass function remarkably well in the high - mass regime , whereas the @xmath0 to @xmath1 region mass function provides the best fit to the bgc mass function in the low mass regime . we have detected 77 hi galaxies in the northern extension of the parkes zoa survey . the survey has a median rms noise of 6.0 mjy beam@xmath5 , is approximately complete to a mean flux density of 22 mjy , and has an effective area of 239 deg@xmath70 . of the 77 galaxies detected here , 19 , 27 , and 11 have likely optical , 2mass , and iras counterparts already cataloged , respectively . in addition , a further 16 have likely optical counterparts visible in the digitized sky survey . twenty have been previously detected in hi . the spatial and velocity distributions of the galaxies in the @xmath0 to @xmath1 region reveal several filaments that cross the galactic plane , the nearest of which seems to be the continuation of a sine - wave like feature that can be traced across the whole southern sky . the medium - velocity galaxies in the @xmath2 to @xmath3 region seem to provide the border of the gemini and canis major voids , whereas the detection of two new low - velocity galaxies within the orion void help to redefine its radius . of particular interest is the galaxy hizoa j0630 + 08 ( @xmath6 = 203@xmath7 , 0.9@xmath7 ) , which has a velocity of @xmath8 km s@xmath5 in the heliocentric standard of rest . we suggest that it belongs to the nearby orion group which includes a small number of dwarf galaxies . an hi mass function was derived using both the standard @xmath93 method and a revised @xmath93 method that is less sensitive to large - scale structure . both methods produce similar mass functions whose normalizations fall slightly below that of the hi parkes bright galaxy catalog . the observations for the southern parkes zoa survey are complete and analysis is currently underway . upon completion , this survey will be combined with the northern extension studied here , which should considerably increase our understanding of the structure and dynamics of the obscured local universe . we thank the staff of the parkes radio telescope . also will saunders for his implementation of the maximum likelihood @xmath93 method . we gratefully acknowledge financial support from the australian - american fulbright commission ( jld ) and conacyt research grant 40094-f ( rckk and jmii ) . to estimate the errors on the hi parameters , each galaxy profile was smoothed using a savitzky - golay smoothing filter with a smoothing width of 8 velocity channels ( press et al . 1992 , sec . fifty simulated spectra were then created for each galaxy by adding random poisson noise to the smoothed galaxy spectrum ; the rms of this random noise was set equal to that of the original galaxy spectrum . the errors on the hi parameters were then taken to be the median absolute offsets between the parameters of the 50 simulated spectra and those of the smoothed galaxy spectrum . to better understand the errors on the hi parameters and the error simulation technique , we investigate below three additional aspects of the error estimation : ( 1 ) the effect of s / n on the measured errors , ( 2 ) the accuracy of the smoothing filter in preserving the galaxy parameters and ( 3 ) the biases introduced to the errors by the simulation process . we explore these issues using the spectrum of j1853 + 09 , which has a s / n of 24 . this spectrum , and the smoothed profile created using the savitzky - golay smoothing filter , are shown in figure a1 . a spectrum with a high s / n was chosen to ensure that the smoothed spectrum , used below as the template , was as representative as possible of a real galaxy profile . to explore the effect of s / n on the errors , we began by running the error simulation , as described in 3.1 , on the template . the simulation was run 21 times ; on each occasion , the rms of the random poisson noise was adjusted to give a desired s / n . the resulting set of 21 simulations have s / n ratios ranging incrementally from 3 to 24 . the errors on the hi parameters , as a function of s / n , are given in figure a2(a ) , where the points represent the median errors and the error bars represent the median absolute value of the errors ( in both the + y and -y directions ) . the errors begin to rise at a s / n of 10 , and do so quite substantially for s / n @xmath112 . this result is in agreement with that of roth , mould , & staveley - smith ( 1994 ) , who performed a similar set of simulations and found that the errors on hi line widths are particularly unreliable for s / n @xmath112 . of the 77 galaxies in our survey , none have a peak s / n @xmath112 , 21 have @xmath113 s / n @xmath114 , and 56 have s / n @xmath115 . each of the 21 error simulations described above created 50 simulated galaxy profiles with a given s / n . to investigate the ability of the smoothing filter to preserve the galaxy profile , we next smoothed each set of 50 simulated profiles using the savitzky - golay smoothing filter . the hi parameters of the smoothed spectra were then measured by mbspect . figure a2(b ) illustrates the difference between the hi parameters of the spectra for which noise was added and then removed and the hi parameters of the original smoothed profile . there are several systematic offsets . for s / n @xmath116 , the peak flux density from the simulated profiles is lower than the peak flux density of the original smoothed profile , as expected from the smoothing process . this offset is quite low , however , tending towards 5% at high s / n . the total flux , systemic velocity , 50% velocity width , and 20% velocity widths are all slightly larger in the simulated smoothed profiles , but remain relatively constant down to s / n ratios of 5 , below which the differences in peak flux density , total flux , and 20% velocity width increase . while it is not surprising that the smoothing filter increases the total flux and velocity widths , the increase in the systemic velocity is unexpected . this change , however , is due to the particular spectrum being used here , and will likely vary with different profiles . as can be seen in figure a1 , the overestimation of the velocity at the high - velocity end of the profile is larger than the underestimation at the low - velocity end , leading to a slight ( @xmath117 km s@xmath5 ) overestimation of the systemic velocity . we lastly investigate how the changes in smoothed parameters discussed above affect the error estimation . to do so , the error simulations were run on each of the 50 simulated galaxy profiles with a given s / n ratio . recall that these 50 simulated spectra were created by adding random noise with a given rms to the template . by running the simulations on these 50 profiles , we remove the noise that we added ( the step explored in the last paragraph ) and then re - add it to the smoothed spectra . if no biases are introduced by the simulation process , the errors now measured should be equal to the errors estimated by running the simulations on the original spectrum of j1853 + 09 . figure a2(c ) illustrates the differences between the errors derived from the simulated profiles and those estimated from the template . the largest bias introduced by the simulation process is the underestimation of the error on the 20% velocity width for spectra with low s / n ratios . at s / n @xmath118 , the error on the peak flux is overestimated by @xmath119% and the error on the total flux is underestimated by @xmath120% . the errors on the systemic velocity , 50% velocity width , and 20% velocity width are offset by an average of -0.2 km s@xmath5 , -0.9 km s@xmath5 , and 0.2 km s@xmath5 . at moderate to high s / n , these offsets are all well within the median errors measured for the galaxies in this sample ( see 3.1 ) , confirming the reliability of this process in estimating errors . @xmath121{donley.figa2a.eps } & \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.70]{donley.figa2b.eps } & \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.70]{donley.figa2c.eps } \end{array}$ ] to investigate the likelihood that the _ nearest _ potential optical and infrared counterparts within both @xmath74 and @xmath75 of the hi position are real counterparts of the hi galaxies , a simulation was performed . in this simulation , fiducial hi detections were placed across our survey region . the positions of these simulated detections were defined by a grid of 120 positions at 20 arcminutes intervals surrounding each of the 77 galaxies . using ned , the 2mass xsc , and the iras psc , counterparts of these false objects were searched for . by measuring the number of objects near these random positions , we determined the number of spurious counterparts expected for our real galaxies , and thus the probability , @xmath122 , that the potential counterparts we detect are in fact related to the hi galaxies . @xmath123 @xmath124 we note that galaxies with low fluxes or large extents often have higher positional errors than bright and/or compact galaxies ; the positional uncertainty of a given source is roughly the gridded parkes beam , 15.5@xmath125 , divided by the signal - to - noise . the probabilities given by these simulations are for the entire sample ; the above effect will cause slight variations among individual galaxies . the simulations were run separately for the two regions of the survey as the density and therefore reliability of counterparts is field - dependent . the difference between simulations with different degrees of clustering around the real hi sample was used to evaluate the approximate errors on the estimated counterpart likelihoods , @xmath122 , @xmath12610% . we present in table b1 the results of the counterpart likelihood simulations . the percentage of counterparts found via the automated search that were still considered likely after a visual verification is roughly consistent with the expected percentages calculated by means of the simulations . the number of likely counterparts to the galaxies in the @xmath2 to @xmath3 region is substantially higher than that of the galaxies in the @xmath0 to @xmath1 region . the difference between the number of potential counterparts in the two survey regions can be attributed to the lower extinction in the latter field . using the 100 @xmath12 m dirbe/_iras _ data ( schlegel et al . 1998 ) , we calculate mean b - band extinctions of @xmath127 and @xmath128 over the @xmath0 to @xmath1 and @xmath2 to @xmath3 regions , respectively . this point is further illustrated by the e(b - v ) contours plotted on figure 8 . although this data are not well calibrated in the galactic plane , they are still useful for general comparison purposes . @xmath0 to @xmath1 , @xmath129r @xmath130 : & & & + n@xmath131 found via automated search & 2 & 6 & 24 + % expected to be real & 5% & 77% & 18% + n@xmath131 that remain after visual inspection & 1(50% ) & 4(67% ) & 2(8% ) + @xmath0 to @xmath1 , @xmath129r @xmath132 : & & & + n@xmath131 found via automated search with @xmath129r @xmath132 & 1 & 5 & 14 + % expected to be real & 26% & 88% & 35% + n@xmath131 that remain after visual inspection & 1(100% ) & 3(60% ) & 2(14% ) + @xmath2 to @xmath3 , @xmath129r @xmath130 : & & & + n@xmath131 found via automated search & 17 & 31 & 15 + % expected to be real & 96% & 59% & 52% + n@xmath131 that remain after visual inspection & 17(100% ) & 16(52% ) & 9(60% ) + @xmath2 to @xmath3 , @xmath129r @xmath132 : & & & + n@xmath131 found via automated search with @xmath129r @xmath132 & 14 & 26 & 13 + % expected to be real & 96% & 79% & 78% + n@xmath131 that remain after visual inspection & 14(100% ) & 14(54% ) & 9(69% ) + j0608 + 13 & 06 08 30 & 13 05 34 & 196.38 & -3.34 & 2.27@xmath133 & 5645@xmath134 & 50@xmath135 & 65@xmath136 & 74 & 9.5 + j0614 + 12 & 06 14 60 & 12 31 06 & 197.65 & -2.22 & 4.03@xmath137 & 5553@xmath138 & 217@xmath139 & 237@xmath135 & 73 & 9.7 + j0615 + 11 & 06 15 40 & 11 09 54 & 198.92 & -2.72 & 7.67@xmath140 & 5446@xmath141 & 184@xmath142 & 238@xmath143 & 71 & 10.0 + j0621 + 11 & 06 21 34 & 11 09 18 & 199.61 & -1.45 & 7.74@xmath144 & 5599@xmath138 & 188@xmath145 & 226@xmath139 & 73 & 10.0 + j0621 + 10 & 06 21 44 & 10 25 39 & 200.27 & -1.75 & 6.74@xmath146 & 7467@xmath147 & 173@xmath143 & 265@xmath148 & 98 & 10.2 + j0622 + 06 & 06 22 04 & 06 29 49 & 203.79 & -3.52 & 8.34@xmath149 & 3598@xmath150 & 296@xmath151 & 314@xmath152 & 46 & 9.6 + j0622 + 11a & 06 22 05 & 11 22 22 & 199.48 & -1.23 & 2.43@xmath149 & 5669@xmath150 & 41@xmath151 & 66@xmath152 & 74 & 9.5 + j0622 + 04 & 06 22 29 & 04 31 57 & 205.58 & -4.34 & 7.74@xmath137 & 2958@xmath153 & 306@xmath143 & 367@xmath154 & 38 & 9.4 + j0622 + 11b & 06 22 59 & 11 08 09 & 199.79 & -1.15 & 19.08@xmath155 & 5493@xmath156 & 366@xmath157 & 409@xmath136 & 72 & 10.4 + j0623 + 14 & 06 23 19 & 14 43 41 & 196.66 & 0.60 & 5.44@xmath158 & 5308@xmath159 & 286@xmath160 & 330@xmath161 & 70 & 9.8 + j0623 + 09 & 06 23 27 & 09 29 46 & 201.29 & -1.82 & 6.27@xmath146 & 8151@xmath162 & 238@xmath163 & 343@xmath164 & 107 & 10.2 + j0623 + 04 & 06 23 36 & 04 22 55 & 205.84 & -4.17 & 3.30@xmath165 & 2870@xmath153 & 97@xmath166 & 130@xmath167 & 37 & 9.0 + j0625 + 03 & 06 25 41 & 03 48 53 & 206.59 & -3.97 & 4.80@xmath137 & 6219@xmath153 & 234@xmath168 & 324@xmath169 & 81 & 9.9 + j0626 + 05 & 06 26 08 & 05 01 09 & 205.57 & -3.31 & 2.67@xmath170 & 3595@xmath141 & 103@xmath139 & 149@xmath139 & 46 & 9.1 + j0630 + 16 & 06 30 05 & 16 50 37 & 195.54 & 3.03 & 30.26@xmath171 & 2532@xmath153 & 258@xmath135 & 328@xmath166 & 33 & 9.9 + j0630 + 08 & 06 30 09 & 08 22 37 & 203.06 & -0.87 & 4.92@xmath172 & 367@xmath156 & 33@xmath136 & 55@xmath145 & 3 & 7.0 + j0630 + 02 & 06 30 42 & 02 40 38 & 208.18 & -3.38 & 3.59@xmath173 & 2774@xmath153 & 120@xmath174 & 144@xmath145 & 35 & 9.0 + j0632 + 06 & 06 32 53 & 06 17 16 & 205.22 & -1.24 & 3.28@xmath175 & 3147@xmath147 & 117@xmath176 & 168@xmath167 & 40 & 9.1 + j0633 + 10 & 06 33 59 & 10 40 40 & 201.45 & 1.03 & 1.68@xmath177 & 7547@xmath138 & 43@xmath178 & 65@xmath174 & 99 & 9.6 + j0634 + 09 & 06 34 05 & 09 13 17 & 202.76 & 0.38 & 1.29@xmath179 & 3876@xmath156 & 37@xmath145 & 48@xmath145 & 50 & 8.9 + j0634 + 00 & 06 34 20 & 00 03 37 & 210.93 & -3.78 & 1.88@xmath170 & 6183@xmath138 & 56@xmath145 & 86@xmath139 & 80 & 9.5 + j0635 + 14a & 06 35 17 & 14 59 15 & 197.77 & 3.29 & 6.44@xmath180 & 3827@xmath134 & 275@xmath168 & 328@xmath168 & 50 & 9.6 + j0635 + 02 & 06 35 44 & 02 24 17 & 209.00 & -2.39 & 4.07@xmath181 & 6334@xmath182 & 41@xmath152 & 228@xmath169 & 83 & 9.8 + j0635 + 03 & 06 35 51 & 03 09 45 & 208.34 & -2.02 & 1.49@xmath165 & 2832@xmath153 & 33@xmath135 & 59@xmath143 & 36 & 8.7 + j0635 + 11 & 06 35 54 & 11 09 44 & 201.24 & 1.67 & 9.11@xmath183 & 3734@xmath141 & 408@xmath166 & 479@xmath145 & 48 & 9.7 + j0635 + 14b & 06 35 54 & 14 36 21 & 198.18 & 3.25 & 16.47@xmath173 & 4020@xmath156 & 329@xmath157 & 360@xmath157 & 52 & 10.0 + j0636 + 00 & 06 36 24 & 00 56 42 & 210.37 & -2.91 & 17.39@xmath184 & 2723@xmath156 & 144@xmath157 & 188@xmath178 & 34 & 9.7 + j0636 + 04 & 06 36 51 & 04 03 60 & 207.65 & -1.38 & 5.45@xmath155 & 3520@xmath134 & 185@xmath185 & 196@xmath186 & 45 & 9.4 + j0637 + 03 & 06 37 39 & 03 24 13 & 208.33 & -1.51 & 5.93@xmath187 & 3431@xmath153 & 160@xmath139 & 172@xmath139 & 44 & 9.4 + j0641 + 01 & 06 41 03 & 01 50 60 & 210.10 & -1.47 & 6.78@xmath165 & 2795@xmath138 & 181@xmath145 & 199@xmath136 & 35 & 9.3 + j0643 + 06 & 06 43 18 & 06 57 57 & 205.81 & 1.37 & 7.75@xmath188 & 6903@xmath153 & 356@xmath166 & 381@xmath143 & 90 & 10.2 + j0644 + 12 & 06 44 01 & 12 25 58 & 201.01 & 4.02 & 9.34@xmath189 & 3925@xmath138 & 403@xmath174 & 425@xmath154 & 51 & 9.8 + j0649 + 09 & 06 49 35 & 09 43 03 & 204.06 & 4.01 & 15.92@xmath183 & 7513@xmath153 & 268@xmath154 & 302@xmath135 & 99 & 10.6 + j0653 + 07 & 06 53 42 & 07 09 54 & 206.80 & 3.76 & 5.63@xmath155 & 7035@xmath134 & 329@xmath174 & 360@xmath190 & 92 & 10.1 + j0654 + 08 & 06 54 10 & 08 35 36 & 205.58 & 4.51 & 5.79@xmath180 & 2625@xmath134 & 128@xmath166 & 172@xmath166 & 33 & 9.2 + j0656 + 06a & 06 56 26 & 06 01 44 & 208.13 & 3.85 & 12.29@xmath175 & 6391@xmath153 & 184@xmath174 & 228@xmath136 & 83 & 10.3 + j0656 + 06b & 06 56 28 & 06 16 43 & 207.91 & 3.97 & 10.69@xmath175 & 6784@xmath141 & 207@xmath166 & 286@xmath142 & 89 & 10.3 + j0659 + 06 & 06 59 37 & 06 26 15 & 208.12 & 4.74 & 4.38@xmath191 & 6365@xmath153 & 145@xmath139 & 168@xmath135 & 83 & 9.9 + j0700 + 01 & 07 00 58 & 01 56 04 & 212.30 & 3.00 & 15.06@xmath188 & 1762@xmath156 & 334@xmath178 & 360@xmath178 & 21 & 9.2 + j0702 + 04 & 07 02 24 & 04 52 39 & 209.83 & 4.66 & 7.23@xmath192 & 6934@xmath153 & 241@xmath145 & 263@xmath174 & 90 & 10.1 + j0702 + 03 & 07 02 50 & 03 13 37 & 211.35 & 4.00 & 4.20@xmath189 & 3551@xmath153 & 86@xmath167 & 121@xmath164 & 45 & 9.3 + j0705 + 02 & 07 05 39 & 02 37 37 & 212.21 & 4.36 & 5.17@xmath180 & 1745@xmath156 & 34@xmath157 & 49@xmath157 & 21 & 8.7 + j1843 + 06 & 18 43 42 & 06 33 59 & 37.91 & 4.70 & 6.34@xmath193 & 8918@xmath147 & 266@xmath194 & 304@xmath195 & 121 & 10.3 + j1852 + 10 & 18 52 59 & 10 25 49 & 42.41 & 4.40 & 5.17@xmath184 & 4906@xmath134 & 238@xmath143 & 275@xmath139 & 68 & 9.8 + j1853 + 09 & 18 53 49 & 09 51 11 & 41.98 & 3.95 & 18.30@xmath146 & 4729@xmath156 & 320@xmath178 & 350@xmath178 & 66 & 10.3 + j1855 + 07 & 18 55 22 & 07 38 34 & 40.18 & 2.61 & 6.08@xmath196 & 6159@xmath134 & 266@xmath168 & 330@xmath197 & 85 & 10.0 + j1857 + 13 & 18 57 22 & 13 26 26 & 45.59 & 4.80 & 5.01@xmath183 & 8095@xmath141 & 173@xmath164 & & 111 & 10.2 + j1900 + 13 & 19 00 06 & 13 33 21 & 45.99 & 4.25 & 9.40@xmath155 & 4658@xmath138 & 234@xmath136 & 252@xmath139 & 65 & 10.0 + j1901 + 06 & 19 01 40 & 06 51 44 & 40.20 & 0.86 & 17.27@xmath198 & 2945@xmath156 & 61@xmath157 & 88@xmath199 & 42 & 9.9 + j1904 + 03a & 19 04 15 & 03 06 47 & 37.16 & -1.43 & 5.60@xmath137 & 3289@xmath138 & 76@xmath145 & 125@xmath166 & 46 & 9.5 + j1904 + 03b & 19 04 27 & 03 11 32 & 37.26 & -1.43 & 5.53@xmath181 & 3195@xmath134 & 232@xmath154 & 260@xmath166 & 45 & 9.4 + j1906 + 12 & 19 06 13 & 12 57 17 & 46.13 & 2.66 & 8.47@xmath200 & 2730@xmath138 & 267@xmath174 & 293@xmath164 & 39 & 9.5 + j1906 + 07 & 19 06 53 & 07 33 52 & 41.42 & 0.04 & 5.16@xmath183 & 3095@xmath141 & 138@xmath143 & 188@xmath194 & 44 & 9.4 + j1907 + 14 & 19 07 33 & 14 02 54 & 47.26 & 2.87 & 4.18@xmath172 & 7290@xmath153 & 89@xmath167 & & 100 & 10.0 + j1908 + 05 & 19 08 26 & 05 59 34 & 40.20 & -1.03 & 5.97@xmath140 & 4567@xmath134 & 168@xmath166 & 196@xmath142 & 63 & 9.8 + j1910 + 00 & 19 10 25 & 00 33 28 & 35.60 & -3.97 & 16.60@xmath200 & 1494@xmath156 & 180@xmath145 & 194@xmath136 & 22 & 9.3 + j1912 + 13 & 19 12 39 & 13 24 33 & 47.26 & 1.48 & 7.09@xmath180 & 2774@xmath156 & 102@xmath178 & 117@xmath157 & 40 & 9.4 + j1912 + 02 & 19 12 45 & 02 56 32 & 37.99 & -3.39 & 15.23@xmath196 & 6541@xmath162 & 470@xmath186 & 597@xmath164 & 90 & 10.5 + j1913 + 17 & 19 13 49 & 17 35 31 & 51.10 & 3.16 & 2.58@xmath144 & 4726@xmath134 & 80@xmath168 & 124@xmath166 & 66 & 9.4 + j1913 + 16 & 19 13 59 & 16 54 60 & 50.52 & 2.81 & 11.47@xmath201 & 6263@xmath134 & 539@xmath166 & 616@xmath186 & 87 & 10.3 + j1914 + 10 & 19 14 57 & 10 17 47 & 44.76 & -0.47 & 20.66@xmath202 & 654@xmath203 & 66@xmath157 & 83@xmath157 & 12 & 8.8 + j1917 + 07 & 19 17 27 & 07 49 14 & 42.86 & -2.17 & 6.89@xmath165 & 3033@xmath138 & 226@xmath174 & 243@xmath174 & 43 & 9.5 + j1917 + 04 & 19 17 38 & 04 26 33 & 39.89 & -3.78 & 11.18@xmath181 & 6330@xmath162 & 325@xmath186 & 416@xmath168 & 87 & 10.3 + j1918 + 16 & 19 18 38 & 16 10 13 & 50.38 & 1.48 & 7.08@xmath187 & 6639@xmath204 & 165@xmath205 & 279@xmath151 & 92 & 10.1 + j1919 + 14 & 19 19 59 & 14 04 01 & 48.67 & 0.20 & 13.70@xmath206 & 2809@xmath138 & 137@xmath139 & 195@xmath135 & 40 & 9.7 + j1921 + 14 & 19 21 36 & 14 54 26 & 49.60 & 0.25 & 6.56@xmath137 & 4080@xmath138 & 72@xmath145 & 88@xmath174 & 57 & 9.7 + j1921 + 08 & 19 21 59 & 08 16 59 & 43.79 & -2.94 & 5.97@xmath207 & 3115@xmath134 & 100@xmath167 & 125@xmath154 & 44 & 9.4 + j1926 + 08 & 19 26 02 & 08 16 09 & 44.25 & -3.84 & 2.62@xmath191 & 3088@xmath138 & 67@xmath168 & 113@xmath154 & 44 & 9.1 + j1927 + 12 & 19 27 36 & 12 19 20 & 48.01 & -2.25 & 5.38@xmath208 & 8604@xmath147 & 138@xmath151 & 204@xmath154 & 118 & 10.2 + j1927 + 09 & 19 27 57 & 09 26 51 & 45.52 & -3.70 & 1.69@xmath137 & 7920@xmath134 & 48@xmath139 & 77@xmath209 & 108 & 9.7 + j1929 + 08 & 19 29 18 & 08 03 55 & 44.46 & -4.64 & 19.08@xmath210 & 3097@xmath147 & 195@xmath185 & 341@xmath142 & 44 & 9.9 + j1929 + 11 & 19 29 24 & 11 36 44 & 47.59 & -2.98 & 5.78@xmath211 & 6331@xmath147 & 351@xmath212 & 388@xmath143 & 87 & 10.0 + j1930 + 12 & 19 30 29 & 12 12 07 & 48.24 & -2.93 & 6.07@xmath140 & 6684@xmath153 & 213@xmath168 & 240@xmath185 & 92 & 10.1 + j1930 + 11 & 19 30 36 & 11 18 53 & 47.47 & -3.38 & 3.11@xmath184 & 3174@xmath153 & 108@xmath139 & 124@xmath168 & 45 & 9.2 + j1933 + 10 & 19 33 56 & 10 42 35 & 47.33 & -4.39 & 6.67@xmath187 & 5255@xmath153 & 240@xmath135 & 282@xmath166 & 73 & 9.9 + j1937 + 14 & 19 37 12 & 14 42 55 & 51.23 & -3.15 & 3.20@xmath180 & 4485@xmath138 & 59@xmath136 & 74@xmath145 & 63 & 9.5 + j1940 + 11 & 19 40 36 & 11 54 18 & 49.18 & -5.24 & 1.49@xmath198 & 580@xmath138 & 20@xmath145 & 32@xmath168 & 11 & 7.6 + j0615 + 11 & -2.72 & 0.8 & adbs j061543 + 1110 & 1.4 & 9.4 & dss galaxy & & j06154496 + 1110227 & 1.3 & & + j0621 + 11 & -1.45 & 0.9 & & & & zoag g199.66 - 01.50 & 4.2 & j06212888 + 1105105 & 4.2 & & + j0621 + 10 & -1.75 & 0.7 & cap 0618 + 10 & 1.0 & 6.1 & wein 192 & 1.0 & j06214000 + 1024565 & 1.0 & 06188 + 1026 & 1.0 + j0622 + 06 & -3.52 & 0.5 & & & & zoag g203.78 - 03.50 & 1.7 & j06220859 + 0631063 & 1.7 & 06194 + 0632 & 2.0 + j0622 + 11a & -1.23 & 0.9 & & & & dss galaxy & 4.0 & & & & + j0622 + 04 & -4.34 & 0.6 & cap 0619 + 04 & 0.9 & 4.9 & zoag g205.58 - 04.36 & 0.9 & j06222633 + 0431236 & 0.9 & 06197 + 0432 & 0.8 + j0622 + 11b & -1.15 & 1.1 & adbs j062302 + 1108 & 1.1 & 50.0 & dss galaxy & & j06225815 + 1108312 & 0.4 & 06202 + 1109 & 0.9 + j0623 + 14 & 0.60 & 0.9 & wein 179 & 1.7 & 54.3 & wein 179 & 1.7 & j06231132 + 1443129 & 1.7 & & + j0623 + 09 & -1.82 & 0.6 & & & & dss galaxy & & j06233278 + 0930182 & 1.8 & & + j0625 + 03 & -3.97 & 0.6 & & & & see note & & see note & & & + j0630 + 16 & 3.03 & 0.6 & & & & zoag g195.62 + 03.04 & 4.7 & j06301575 + 1646422 & 4.7 & & + j0630 + 02 & -3.38 & 0.9 & & & & dss galaxy & & j06303567 + 0238356 & 2.4 & & + j0633 + 10 & 1.03 & 1.5 & & & & & & j06334997 + 1039414 & 2.4 & & + j0634 + 09 & 0.38 & 0.8 & & & & dss galaxy & 0.4 & & & & + j0635 + 14a & 3.29 & 0.5 & ugc 03498 & 1.0 & -27.3 & ugc 03498 & 1.0 & j06352031 + 1458436 & 0.9 & 06324 + 1501 & 1.0 + j0635 + 02 & -2.39 & 1.8 & & & & dss galaxy & & j06353276 + 0224228 & 2.6 & & + j0635 + 11 & 1.67 & 1.5 & adbs j063549 + 1107 & 2.4 & 31.3 & dss galaxy & 1.6 & & & & + & & & adbs j063606 + 1109 & 2.4 & -163.8 & & & & & & + j0635 + 14b & 3.25 & 0.6 & & & & pgc 3097165 & 0.8 & j06355671 + 1435584 & 0.7 & & + j0636 + 00 & -2.91 & 1.5 & & & & zoag g210.39 - 02.92 & 1.0 & & & 06338 + 0058 & 0.9 + j0643 + 06 & 1.37 & 0.8 & wein 206 & 1.4 & 2.4 & wein 206 & 1.4 & j06431155 + 0657324 & 1.4 & & + j0644 + 12 & 4.02 & 0.4 & ugc 03524 & 1.9 & -2.9 & ugc 03524 & 1.9 & j06440058 + 1224067 & 1.9 & 06412 + 1227 & 1.8 + j0649 + 09 & 4.01 & 0.3 & & & & zoag g204.10 + 03.97 & 3.4 & j06493148 + 0939437 & 3.4 & & + j0653 + 07 & 3.76 & 0.3 & & & & zoag g206.80 + 03.71 & 2.8 & j06533152 + 0708263 & 2.8 & & + j0654 + 08 & 4.51 & 0.2 & adbs j065406 + 0834 & 1.4 & 13.9 & zoag g205.59 + 04.48 & 1.4 & & & & + j0656 + 06a & 3.85 & 0.4 & cap 0653 + 06 & 1.9 & -0.3 & zoag g208.14 + 03.82 & 1.9 & j06562110 + 0600057 & 1.9 & & + j0656 + 06b & 3.97 & 0.3 & ugc 03607 & 2.4 & -18.0 & ugc 03607 & 2.4 & j06561786 + 0616066 & 2.4 & 06536 + 0620 & 2.3 + j0659 + 06 & 4.74 & 0.3 & & & & dss galaxy & 1.1 & & & & + j0700 + 01 & 3.00 & 0.5 & ugc 03630 & 1.9 & -0.4 & ugc 03630 & 1.9 & j07010328 + 0154406 & 1.9 & 06584 + 0158 & 2.0 + j0702 + 04 & 4.66 & 0.3 & cap 0659 + 04 & 1.6 & -3.9 & zoag g209.84 + 04.63 & 1.6 & j07021916 + 0451191 & 1.6 & & + j0702 + 03 & 4.00 & 0.4 & & & & dss galaxy & 2.4 & & & & + j0705 + 02 & 4.36 & 0.5 & [ h92 ] 16 & 0.3 & 0.3 & & & & & & + j1857 + 13 & 4.80 & 0.9 & & & & dss galaxy & & j18573802 + 1328565 & 4.8 & & + j1901 + 06 & 0.86 & 5.6 & dw040.0 + 0.9 & 1.3 & -10.5 & & & & & & + j1906 + 12 & 2.66 & 1.5 & 2masx j19061820 + 1256195 & 1.6 & -8.4 & dss galaxy & & j19061820 + 1256195 & 1.6 & & + j1910 + 00 & -3.97 & 0.7 & hizss 110 & 3.0 & 9.0 & & & & & & + j1913 + 16 & 2.81 & 2.4 & & & & dss galaxy & & j19135226 + 1655279 & 1.5 & & + j1914 + 10 & -0.47 & 11.7 & dw044.8 - 0.5 & 0.3 & 15.5 & & & & & & + j1917 + 07 & -2.17 & 1.9 & & & & dss galaxy & 0.5 & & & & + j1917 + 04 & -3.78 & 1.0 & zoag g039.88 - 03.78 & 0.1 & 7.2 & zoag g039.88 - 03.78 & 0.1 & j19173769 + 0426248 & 0.1 & 19151 + 0421 & 0.2 + j1929 + 08 & -4.64 & 0.5 & & & & dss galaxy & 1.3 & & & 19269 + 0756 & 1.3 + j1933 + 10 & -4.39 & 0.5 & & & & dss galaxy & & j19335171 + 1042247 & 0.8 & & + Abstract:
[ "we present the results of the northern extension of the hi parkes zone of avoidance survey , a blind hi survey utilizing the multibeam receiver on the parkes 64-m telescope . in the two regions studied here , @xmath0 to @xmath1 and @xmath2 to @xmath3 , @xmath4 , we have detected 77 hi galaxies , twenty of which have been previously detected in hi . the survey has a median rms noise of 6.0 mjy beam@xmath5 and is complete to a mean flux density of 22 mjy . we have searched for multiwavelength counterparts to the 77 galaxies detected here : 19 , 27 , and 11 have a likely optical , 2mass , and iras cataloged counterpart , respectively . a further 16 galaxies have likely visible counterparts on the digitized sky survey . the detection of these 77 galaxies allows a closer inspection of the large - scale structures in these regions . we see several filaments crossing the galactic plane , one of which appears to be the continuation of a sine - wave like feature that can be traced across the whole southern sky . an analysis of the hi mass function suggests that the regions studied here may be underdense . one particularly noteworthy galaxy is hizoa j0630 + 08 ( @xmath6 = 203@xmath7 , 0.9@xmath7 ) with a velocity of @xmath8 km s@xmath5 . we suggest that it belongs to the nearby orion group which includes a small number of dwarf galaxies . the newly detected galaxies improve our understanding of the properties of several voids , such as the orion , gemini , and canis major voids ." ]
12,797
12,797
16,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: an abelian cover is a finite morphism @xmath0 of varieties which is the quotient map for a generically faithful action of a finite abelian group @xmath1 . this means that for every component @xmath7 of @xmath2 the @xmath1-action on the restricted cover @xmath8 is faithful . the paper @xcite contains a comprehensive theory of such covers in the case when @xmath2 is smooth and @xmath3 is normal . the covers are described in terms of the _ building data _ consisting of branch divisors @xmath9 ranging over cyclic subgroups @xmath10 , and line bundles @xmath11 with @xmath12 ranging over the character group of @xmath1 . this collection must satisfy the _ fundamental relations_. here , we extend this theory to the case of singular varieties . namely , we allow @xmath3 and @xmath2 to be varieties satisfying serre s condition @xmath4 and having double crossing singularities in codimension 1 , which we abbreviate to g.d.c . for `` generically double crossings '' ( see [ ssec : ysmooth ] for the precise definition ) . our interest in this case lies in applications to the moduli theory . such non - normal abelian covers appear in our work @xcite where we explicitly construct compactifications of moduli spaces of some campedelli and burniat surfaces by adding stable surfaces on the boundary . `` stable surfaces '' here are in the sense of @xcite : they have slc ( semi log canonical ) singularities and ample canonical class . in this paper , we give a comprehensive treatment of the situation . in section [ ssec : ysmooth ] we show that the theory of standard covers of @xcite has a very natural extension to the case when @xmath2 is still smooth but @xmath3 is possibly g.d.c .. in section [ ssec : ynormal ] we extend it to the case of normal base by an @xmath4-fication trick . in section [ ssec : ynonnormal ] we prove that a cover with non normal @xmath2 can be obtained by gluing a cover over the normalization @xmath13 , and we spell out which additional data must be specified . in section [ sec : geometry ] we study the singularities of covers . we determine the conditions for @xmath3 to have slc singularities , to be cohen - macaulay , and we determine the index of the canonical divisor in the situations appearing in common applications . in section [ sec : z2-covers ] we treat in detail the special case when the group @xmath1 is @xmath14 and @xmath15 , as in @xcite . we restrict ourselves to the situation where the base @xmath2 is smooth or has two smooth branches meeting transversally , and the components of branch divisors and the double locus are smooth and have distinct tangent directions at the points of intersection , i.e. locally they look like a collection of lines in the plane . in this situation , we give a complete classification of the covers and the singularities of @xmath3 . the answer is contained in nine tables . some of these covers appear on the boundary of moduli of campedelli and burniat surfaces , but the full list is longer . @xmath1 denotes a finite abelian group . we work with equidimensional varieties defined over an algebraically closed field @xmath16 whose characteristic does not divide the order of @xmath1 . we denote by @xmath17 the group @xmath18 of characters of @xmath1 , and we write it multiplicatively . the abbreviations _ lc _ and _ slc _ stand for _ log canonical _ and _ semi log canonical_. ( cf . [ sec : geometry ] for the definitions ) . @xmath19 , @xmath20 , etc . denote the normalization of @xmath3 , @xmath21 , etc . we use the additive and multiplicative notation for line bundles and divisors interchangeably . linear equivalence will be denoted by @xmath22 . the first author was partially supported by nsf under dms 0901309 . the second author wishes to thank miles reid and angelo vistoli for several useful communications . we also thank the referee for many useful comments and corrections . part of this work was done while both authors were visiting msri in the spring of 2009 . this project was partially supported by the italian prin 2008 project _ geometria delle variet algebriche e dei loro spazi di moduli_. the second author is a member of gnsaga of indam . we recall some basic facts about serre s condition @xmath4 and the @xmath4-fication of a coherent sheaf . for a comprehensive treatment , the reader may consult @xcite , where the latter appears under the name `` @xmath23-closure '' . all varieties below are assumed to be reduced , equidimensional , but possibly reducible . let @xmath24 be a coherent sheaf on @xmath3 all of whose associated components are irreducible components of @xmath3 . then there exists a unique _ @xmath4-fication _ , or _ saturation in codimension 2 _ , a coherent sheaf defined by @xmath25 the sheaf @xmath26 is @xmath4 , and @xmath24 is @xmath4 iff the map @xmath27 is an isomorphism . in particular , for @xmath28 one obtains the @xmath4-fication @xmath29 , which is dominated by the normalization of @xmath3 . on a normal variety @xmath3 , an @xmath4-sheaf is the same as a _ reflexive sheaf _ , satisfying @xmath30 , see @xcite . further , reflexive sheaves of rank 1 are the same as _ divisorial sheaves _ , isomorphic to @xmath31 for some weil divisor @xmath32 , see e.g. ( * ? ? 1 ) . on a smooth ( or factorial ) variety weil divisors are the same as cartier divisors , and rank 1 @xmath4 sheaves are the same as invertible sheaves . let @xmath1 be a finite abelian group . an _ abelian cover _ with galois group @xmath1 , or _ @xmath1-cover _ , is a finite morphism @xmath0 of varieties which is the quotient map for a generically faithful action of a finite abelian group @xmath1 . this means that for every component @xmath7 of @xmath2 the @xmath1-action on the restricted cover @xmath33 is faithful . an _ isomorphism _ of @xmath1-covers @xmath34 , @xmath35 is an isomorphism @xmath36 such that @xmath37 . the @xmath1-action on @xmath3 with @xmath38 is equivalent to a decomposition : @xmath39 where @xmath1 acts on @xmath40 via the character @xmath12 . if @xmath41 is galois then each @xmath40 has rank 1 : if @xmath42 is a general closed point , then @xmath1 acts freely on @xmath43 , so it acts on @xmath44 as the regular representation . thus , @xmath45 is @xmath46-dimensional for every @xmath12 . when the sheaves @xmath40 are locally free , it is customary to write @xmath47 , with @xmath11 a line bundle . [ lem : flatness - and - cm ] 1 . the sheaf @xmath48 is @xmath49 for some @xmath50 iff every @xmath40 is @xmath49 . 2 . if @xmath51 is flat then @xmath3 is cm iff @xmath2 is cm . if @xmath2 is smooth and @xmath3 is @xmath4 then @xmath41 is flat and @xmath3 is cm . \(1 ) is clear by definition of depth . \(2 ) @xmath41 is flat iff every @xmath52-module @xmath40 is invertible . then each @xmath40 is cm iff @xmath52 is . \(3 ) on a smooth variety every divisorial sheaf is invertible , and so flat . now ( 2 ) applies . a @xmath1-cover @xmath51 , where @xmath3 and @xmath2 are @xmath4 varieties , is determined by its restriction to the complement of a closed subset of codimension @xmath5 : [ lem : remove - codim2 ] let @xmath2 be an @xmath4 variety , @xmath53 an open subset with @xmath54 , and @xmath55 a @xmath1-cover with @xmath56 an @xmath4 variety . then there exist a unique @xmath4 variety @xmath3 and a @xmath1-cover @xmath51 whose restriction to @xmath57 is @xmath58 . for the existence , we take @xmath59 , where @xmath60 is the inclusion . then @xmath61 , where each @xmath40 is a rank 1 @xmath4-sheaf . the algebra structure on @xmath48 is defined as follows . for an open set @xmath62 and sections @xmath63 , @xmath64 , their product is @xmath65 since @xmath66 and @xmath40 is saturated in codimension 2 . thus , @xmath67 is an @xmath4 variety with a finite morphism to @xmath2 . the @xmath17-grading on @xmath48 defines the @xmath1-action on @xmath3 . by construction , the eigenspace @xmath68 for the trivial character is @xmath69 . therefore , @xmath38 . uniqueness follows from the uniqueness of the @xmath4-fication . given a @xmath1-cover @xmath51 and an irreducible subset @xmath70 , we define the _ inertia subgroup _ @xmath71 of @xmath72 to be the subgroup of @xmath1 consisting of the elements that fix @xmath73 pointwise , or , equivalently since @xmath1 is abelian , that fix an irreducible component of @xmath73 pointwise . the _ branch locus _ @xmath74 of @xmath41 is the set of points of @xmath2 whose inertia subgroup is not trivial ( notice that we regard @xmath74 simply as a set , without giving it a scheme structure ) . if @xmath41 is flat , then @xmath74 is a divisor by ( * ? ? ? if @xmath75 is an irreducible divisor of @xmath2 such that @xmath3 is generically smooth along @xmath76 , then the natural representation @xmath77 of @xmath78 on the tangent space @xmath79 at the generic point of an irreducible component @xmath80 of @xmath76 is faithful , hence @xmath81 is cyclic ( cf . @xcite ) . notice that @xmath77 does not depend on the choice of the component @xmath80 of @xmath76 since @xmath1 is abelian . in this section we recall , in a form which is convenient for our later applications , the definition of standard abelian covers , a class of flat abelian covers that can be constructed from a collection of line bundles and effective divisors on the target variety ( cf . @xcite , @xcite ) . the prototypical example is the classical construction of a double cover of a variety @xmath2 from the data of an effective divisor @xmath32 on @xmath2 and a line bundle @xmath82 such that @xmath83 . let @xmath2 be a variety . a set of _ building data for a standard @xmath1-cover _ @xmath51 consists of the following : * irreducible effective cartier divisors @xmath84 ( possibly not distinct ) , * for each @xmath85 a pair @xmath86 , where @xmath87 is a cyclic subgroup of @xmath1 of order @xmath88 and @xmath89 is a generator of the group of characters @xmath90 , * line bundles @xmath11 , for @xmath91 . moreover we assume that these data satisfy the so called _ fundamental relations _ : @xmath92 where for a character @xmath12 we write @xmath93 , with @xmath94 , and we define @xmath95 $ ] . observe that @xmath96 is equal either to @xmath97 or to @xmath46 . we call the divisors @xmath85 , together with the pairs @xmath98 , the _ branch data _ of the cover . an equivalent way of describing the branch data , and therefore the building data , is to give for each pair @xmath99 , with @xmath100 a cyclic subgroup and @xmath101 a generator , the divisor @xmath102 . this is the notation used in @xcite . [ rem : branchdata ] if the group @xmath103 has no @xmath104-torsion , where @xmath105 , then the branch data determine the building data by ( * ? ? ? 2.1 ) . in general , the branch data are enough to determine the local geometry of the cover ( cf . proposition [ prop : bdata ] , ( 2 ) ) . when @xmath106 , it is enough to associate with every divisor @xmath85 a nonzero element @xmath107 , the generator of @xmath87 . also , the definition of @xmath108 is simpler : @xmath109 is equal to 1 if @xmath110 and it is equal to 0 otherwise . we now explain how to construct a @xmath1-cover from a set of building data . choose @xmath111 such that @xmath17 is the direct sum of the cyclic subgroups generated by the @xmath112 . denote by @xmath113 the order of @xmath112 and write @xmath114 and @xmath115 . by ( * prop.2.1 ) for @xmath116 there exist isomorphisms : @xmath117 notice that the coefficients @xmath118 in the above formula are integers . using formulae ( 2.15 ) of @xcite and the isomorphisms @xmath119 above , one constructs for each pair @xmath120 of non trivial characters an isomorphism @xmath121 such that for every @xmath122 the following diagram commutes ( we set @xmath123 ) : @xmath124 where @xmath125 and the maps are induced by the @xmath126 in the obvious way . we denote by @xmath127 the maps induced by composing @xmath126 with the inclusion @xmath128 . by the commutativity of diagram , the collection of maps @xmath129 defines on @xmath130 a commutative and associative algebra structure compatible with the @xmath1-action defined by letting @xmath1 act trivially on @xmath131 and via the character @xmath12 on @xmath132 for @xmath133 . we define @xmath134 with the natural map @xmath135 to be a _ standard @xmath1-cover _ associated with the given set of building data . notice that , since the @xmath132 are locally free , @xmath41 is flat and @xmath3 is @xmath4 if @xmath2 is . @xmath3 can be described locally above a point @xmath42 as follows . up to shrinking @xmath2 , we may assume that all the @xmath11 are trivial and that the @xmath85 are defined by equations @xmath136 . if we denote by @xmath137 a coordinate on @xmath132 , @xmath138 , then @xmath3 is given inside the vector bundle @xmath139 by the following set of equations : @xmath140 where the @xmath141 are nowhere vanishing regular functions and for @xmath142 we set @xmath143 . for @xmath144 , denote by @xmath145 the order of @xmath12 and write @xmath146 , with @xmath147 . eliminating between the equations , one gets @xmath148 where @xmath149 is a nowhere vanishing function . it follows immediately that @xmath3 is a variety : indeed , using the decomposition of @xmath150 into @xmath1-eigenspaces , we may assume that a nilpotent element is locally of the form @xmath151 for some character @xmath12 and some regular function @xmath152 . then by , @xmath153 for some @xmath154 only if @xmath155 . using the local equations , one can also show the following : [ lem : inertia ] notation as above . let @xmath156 be a standard @xmath1-cover and @xmath42 be a point . the inertia subgroup @xmath157 of @xmath158 is equal to @xmath159 . since the question is local on @xmath2 , we may assume that @xmath3 is given by the equations . let @xmath160 be a point lying above @xmath158 . then by the coordinate @xmath161 does not vanish iff @xmath162 for every @xmath163 such that @xmath164 . since an element @xmath165 fixes @xmath166 if and only if for every @xmath167 such that @xmath168 the coordinate @xmath161 vanishes , this remark proves the claim . given a set of building data , the construction of the standard @xmath1-cover @xmath51 depends of course on the choice of the characters @xmath169 and of the isomorphims @xmath119 . assume that @xmath170 are another set of characters of @xmath1 such that @xmath17 is the direct sum of the cyclic subgroups generated by the @xmath171 . let @xmath172 be the order of @xmath171 , @xmath173 ; then by the multiplication maps for @xmath174 isomorphisms @xmath175 , where @xmath176 and @xmath177 . by the associativity and commutativity of the multiplication the algebra structure defined on @xmath178 by the @xmath179 is the same as that induced by the @xmath119 . hence it is enough to analyze to what extent the isomorphism class of @xmath41 depends on the @xmath119 : [ prop : bdata ] 1 . _ ( global case ) . _ if @xmath180 , then the building data determine @xmath51 up to isomorphism of @xmath1-covers . 2 . in general , given two standard covers @xmath181 , @xmath182 , with the same building data , there exists an tale cover @xmath183 such that , after base change with @xmath183 , @xmath184 and @xmath185 give isomorphic @xmath1-covers . \(2 ) we use the notation introduced above . let @xmath186 , @xmath187 be two @xmath188-algebra structures on @xmath189 given by isomorphisms @xmath119 , respectively @xmath190 . the isomorphisms @xmath119 , @xmath190 differ by an automorphism of @xmath191 , namely by multiplication by an element @xmath192 . this automorphism is induced by an automorphism of @xmath193 iff @xmath194 has a @xmath113-th root @xmath195 . so , up to taking an tale cover , one can assume that the roots @xmath196 exist . by formulae ( 2.15 ) of @xcite , the @xmath196 can be used to define for all @xmath91 automorphisms @xmath197 of @xmath198 that commute with the isomorphisms @xmath126 and @xmath199 . to prove statement ( 1 ) , just observe that if @xmath180 no base change is necessary to construct the isomorphism above . [ rem : local ] let @xmath51 be a @xmath1-cover with branch data @xmath200 , let @xmath42 and let @xmath136 be local equations for @xmath85 near @xmath158 . combining proposition [ prop : bdata ] with the local equations , we see that , up to passing to an tale cover of @xmath201 , @xmath3 is defined locally near @xmath158 by the equations : @xmath202 here we find conditions for a @xmath1-cover of a smooth variety to be standard . we keep the notation of the previous section . [ defn : hurwitz ] let @xmath2 be a smooth variety and let @xmath51 be a standard @xmath1-cover with building data @xmath11 , @xmath85 , @xmath98 . by lemma [ lem : inertia ] the branch locus @xmath74 of @xmath41 is the support of the divisor @xmath203 . we define the _ hurwitz divisor _ of @xmath41 as the @xmath204-divisor @xmath205 . notice that the support of @xmath32 is equal to @xmath74 . we say that a variety is _ _ ( has _ double crossings _ ) if every point is either smooth or analytically isomorphic to @xmath206 . we say that a variety is _ _ ( has _ generically double crossing_s ) if it is d.c . outside a closed subset of codimension @xmath5 the following result generalizes the main result of @xcite : [ thm : structure ] let @xmath51 be a @xmath1-cover such that @xmath2 is smooth and @xmath3 is @xmath4 . then : 1 . @xmath3 is normal iff @xmath41 is standard and every component of the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 has multiplicity @xmath207 . 2 . assume that @xmath41 is standard . then @xmath3 is g.d.c . iff every component of @xmath32 has multiplicity @xmath208 . 3 . assume that @xmath3 is g.d.c .. then @xmath41 is standard iff for every irreducible divisor @xmath75 of @xmath2 such that @xmath3 is singular above @xmath75 one has @xmath209 for some @xmath210 . in the case @xmath106 , which is of special interest to us because of the applications in @xcite , theorem [ thm : structure ] reads : [ cor : structurez2 ] let @xmath51 be a @xmath6-cover such that @xmath2 is smooth and @xmath3 is @xmath4 . then : 1 . @xmath3 is normal iff @xmath41 is standard and every component of @xmath32 has multiplicity @xmath207 . 2 . @xmath3 is g.d.c . iff @xmath41 is standard and every component of @xmath32 has multiplicity @xmath208 . let @xmath51 be a standard @xmath1-cover with @xmath2 smooth and @xmath3 g.d.c . and let @xmath75 be a component of the branch divisor @xmath74 . by lemma [ lem : inertia ] , we have @xmath211 . the pairs ( subgroup , character ) corresponding to @xmath75 can be determined as follows : * assume that @xmath75 has multiplicity @xmath207 in the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 . then there is precisely one index @xmath163 with @xmath212 . in this case , @xmath213 and the character @xmath89 is given by the action of @xmath87 on the tangent space to @xmath3 at the generic point of an irreducible component of @xmath76 ( cf . @xcite , 1 and 2 ) . * assume that @xmath75 has multiplicity @xmath214 in @xmath32 . then there are precisely two indices @xmath215 and @xmath216 such that @xmath217 and @xmath218 and @xmath219 have order 2 . so either @xmath220 or @xmath221 . in the latter case the proof of theorem [ thm : structure ] shows that @xmath218 and @xmath219 are generated by the elements of @xmath81 that interchange the two branches of @xmath3 at a general point of @xmath76 . statement ( 1 ) is @xcite , thm . 2.1 and cor.3.1 . so consider the non - normal case . the cover @xmath41 is flat since @xmath2 is smooth and @xmath3 is @xmath4 , hence we write as usual @xmath222 . the cover is standard if and only if there exist branch data @xmath85 , @xmath98 such that for every @xmath223 the zero divisor of the multiplication map @xmath224 is equal to @xmath225 , where the @xmath226 are defined in [ ssec : standard ] . notice that @xmath3 , being @xmath4 , is non - normal if and only if it is singular in codimension 1 . fix a component @xmath75 of @xmath32 such that @xmath3 is singular above @xmath75 . write @xmath227 . the cover @xmath41 factors as @xmath228 and @xmath75 is not contained in the branch locus of the map @xmath229 , hence @xmath230 is generically smooth over @xmath75 . it follows that there is an element of @xmath231 that exchanges the two branches of @xmath3 at a general point of @xmath76 . let @xmath232 be the normalization , let @xmath233 be the induced @xmath1-cover , let @xmath234 be the pair ( subgroup , character ) corresponding to @xmath75 for the cover @xmath235 and let @xmath236 be the order of @xmath237 ( if @xmath235 is not branched on @xmath75 , we take @xmath237 and @xmath238 to be trivial ) . since the normalization map @xmath232 is @xmath1-equivariant , we have a short exact sequence : @xmath239 we consider the @xmath231-covers @xmath240 and @xmath241 and we study the algebras @xmath242 and @xmath243 , where @xmath244 is an irreducible component of the inverse image of @xmath75 in @xmath245 . we denote by @xmath246 a local parameter . we distinguish three cases : in this case @xmath247 , and @xmath3 is given locally by @xmath248 , where @xmath249 . let @xmath101 be a generator that restricts to @xmath238 on @xmath237 . the algebra @xmath250 is generated by elements @xmath251 such that : @xmath252 where @xmath253 and @xmath231 acts on @xmath254 via the character @xmath77 and on @xmath255 via the character @xmath256 . the eigenspace corresponding to @xmath257 is generated by @xmath258 for @xmath259 , and by @xmath260 for @xmath261 . since the inclusion @xmath262 is @xmath1-equivariant , @xmath263 is generated by elements of the form @xmath264 for suitable @xmath265 . since @xmath231 fixes @xmath266 pointwise , by the argument in the proof of lemma [ lem : inertia ] @xmath267 is contained in the subalgebra @xmath268 of @xmath250 generated by @xmath269 @xmath270 is also generated by @xmath271 , with the only relation @xmath272 , hence @xmath273 is g.d.c . and the map @xmath274 is an isomorphism . so @xmath275 . in this case @xmath236 is even and @xmath276 . we denote by @xmath101 a character that restricts to @xmath238 on @xmath237 and by @xmath277 the character such that @xmath278 . @xmath250 is generated by @xmath251 such that : @xmath279 where @xmath253 and @xmath231 acts on @xmath254 via the character @xmath77 and on @xmath255 via the character @xmath277 . arguing as in the previous case , one checks that @xmath263 is generated by : @xmath280 @xmath267 can also be generated by @xmath281 with the only relation @xmath272 . for @xmath282 , denote by @xmath283 the order of vanishing on @xmath75 of the multiplication map @xmath284 . using the above analysis and arguing as in the proof of ( 2.1 ) , one obtains the following rules , up to exchanging @xmath285 and @xmath286 : * @xmath287 if @xmath288 , + @xmath289 otherwise . * for @xmath182 , write @xmath290 , where @xmath291 or @xmath46 and @xmath292 . then : + @xmath287 if @xmath293 , @xmath294 , + @xmath295 if @xmath296 , @xmath297 , @xmath298 , + @xmath299 $ ] in the remaining cases . * for @xmath182 , write @xmath300,where @xmath291 or @xmath46 and @xmath292 . then : + @xmath287 if @xmath293 , @xmath294 , + @xmath295 if @xmath296 , @xmath297 , @xmath298 + @xmath301 $ ] in the remaining cases . in the above analysis the group @xmath302 appears in case ( a ) and case ( c ) for @xmath303 . in case ( a ) , the cover @xmath41 is standard : @xmath75 appears twice among the branch data , both times with label @xmath231 . in case ( c ) , @xmath41 is standard for @xmath303 : @xmath75 appears twice among the branch data , with labels @xmath304 and @xmath305 corresponding to the subgroups of order 2 of @xmath231 distinct from @xmath237 . moreover , it is not difficult to check that in case ( b ) and in case ( c ) for @xmath306 the cover is not standard . so we have proven ( 3 ) and also that every component of the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 of a standard g.d.c . cover has multiplicity @xmath307 . vice versa , assume that @xmath41 is standard and @xmath75 appears in @xmath32 with multiplicity @xmath208 . if the multiplicity is @xmath207 then the cover is normal over @xmath75 . if the multiplicity is equal to @xmath46 , then @xmath75 appears twice among the branch data , and the corresponding subgroups @xmath308 and @xmath309 have order 2 . if @xmath310 , then the cover is given over the generic point of @xmath75 by the equation @xmath311 , with @xmath312 a unit ; so it is g.d.c . if @xmath313 , then the cover is given by the equations @xmath314 , @xmath315 , with @xmath316 and @xmath317 units . these equations are equivalent to @xmath318 , so the cover is g.d.c .. this completes the proof of ( 2 ) . let @xmath51 be a @xmath1-cover such that @xmath2 is normal and @xmath3 is @xmath4 . let @xmath57 be the nonsingular locus of @xmath2 . then the restriction @xmath55 is a @xmath1-cover , and by lemma [ lem : remove - codim2 ] @xmath41 is the unique @xmath4-extension of @xmath58 to @xmath2 . thus the theory in the normal case is the immediate extension of the nonsingular case . we record the changes : 1 . the sheaves @xmath40 are no longer invertible but they are @xmath4 , i.e. in this case reflexive , divisorial sheaves . the multiplication maps are @xmath319 2 . the branch divisors @xmath320 are weil divisors . otherwise , the same fundamental relations between @xmath40 and @xmath320 must hold . one has to be careful that the morphism @xmath41 may be not flat ; indeed , it is flat iff all @xmath40 are invertible . also , for a singular @xmath2 the branch locus may have non - divisorial components . let @xmath321 $ ] , @xmath322 acting by @xmath323 , @xmath324 , and let @xmath2 be the quotient @xmath325 $ ] , a quadratic cone . then @xmath41 is ramified only over the vertex @xmath326 of the cone . the divisors @xmath320 are zero . the eigensheaves are @xmath327 and @xmath328 , the divisorial sheaf corresponding to a line @xmath329 through the vertex . @xmath328 is also isomorphic to the @xmath52-submodule of @xmath48 generated by @xmath166 and @xmath158 . the fundamental relation in this case is @xmath330 . now we assume that @xmath2 is a non normal g.d.c . and @xmath4 variety . let @xmath21 be the divisorial part of the singular locus of @xmath2 , let @xmath331 be the normalization , let @xmath332 be the inverse image of @xmath21 in @xmath13 and let @xmath333 be the normalization . since @xmath2 is g.d.c . , there is a biregular involution @xmath334 on @xmath335 induced by the degree 2 map @xmath336 . ( if the components of @xmath2 are smooth , then @xmath335 is a union of several pairs of varieties , exchanged by the involution @xmath334 . in general , some components of @xmath337 map to themselves ) . consider a commutative diagram : where @xmath3 and @xmath338 are g.d.c . and @xmath4 varieties , the vertical arrows are @xmath1-covers , @xmath339 is a cover as in the previous section , and @xmath340 is a birational morphism . we denote by @xmath341 the preimages of @xmath342 in @xmath343 , and by @xmath344 the normalization of @xmath345 . @xmath346 \ar[dd ] \ar@(ul , dl)[]_{j } & & b ' \ar[rr ] \ar[dd ] \ar@{^(->}[dr ] & & b \ar@{^(->}[dr ] \ar[dd ] \\ & & & & & x ' \ar[rr ] \ar[dd ] & & x \ar[dd ] \\ & & \wt{c ' } \ar[rr ] \ar@(ul , dl)[]_{\iota } & & c ' \ar[rr ] \ar@{^(->}[dr ] & & c \ar@{^(->}[dr ] \\ & & & & & \wy \ar^{\nu}[rr ] & & y } \ ] ] we first give two constructions for the cover @xmath0 starting with @xmath347 and the appropriate data for the double locus . one construction proceeds by @xmath4-fication of the `` nice '' part . the second one is by a gluing procedure , and the result is very convenient for computing the invariants of @xmath3 . finally , we show that indeed every @xmath0 comes from these constructions . [ thm : glue ] suppose we are given 1 . @xmath2 , @xmath13 , @xmath332 , @xmath348 , 2 . a @xmath1-cover @xmath339 , with @xmath338 an @xmath4 and g.d.c . variety , let @xmath349 be the induced cover and let @xmath350 be its normalization . then @xmath338 can be glued to a cover @xmath0 with @xmath3 g.d.c . and @xmath4 if and only if it is generically smooth along @xmath345 , and there exists an involution @xmath351 that covers the involution @xmath352 and commutes with the action of @xmath1 on @xmath344 . assume that @xmath3 exists . then the map @xmath353 induces an involution @xmath354 as required . in addition , if @xmath338 were not generically smooth along a component @xmath75 of @xmath345 , then @xmath3 would have generically at least three branches along the image of @xmath75 . thus these two conditions on @xmath338 are necessary for the existence of @xmath3 . next we show that they are also sufficient . we start by identifying the `` bad locus '' . it includes the singular locus of @xmath13 , the intersection of branch divisors between themselves and with @xmath332 . the image of this bad locus in @xmath2 has codimension @xmath355 . let @xmath57 be its complement , and restrict all varieties and covers to @xmath57 . the condition that the involution @xmath354 commutes with the @xmath1-action implies that for any irreducible component @xmath75 of @xmath345 the subgroup @xmath231 of elements of @xmath1 that fix @xmath75 pointwise is the same as the supgroup of elements that fix @xmath356 pointwise . since @xmath338 is generically smooth along @xmath345 , one has ( cf . @xcite ) @xmath357 for some @xmath50 and , working tale - locally , @xmath231 acts locally by @xmath358 near @xmath75 and by @xmath359 near @xmath356 for some primitive root @xmath360 and @xmath361 . here @xmath362 , @xmath363 . we glue @xmath364 along @xmath365 to obtain a variety @xmath56 with a finite morphism to @xmath57 . the @xmath1-action extends to @xmath56 , because @xmath354 commutes with the @xmath1-action , and is of the type ( smooth ) @xmath366 ( compatible action of curves ) , where `` compatible '' means that , working tale - locally , @xmath367 acts on @xmath206 by @xmath368 , @xmath369 over the double locus we have @xmath370/(xy)$ ] and the ring of @xmath371-invariants is @xmath372/(uv)$ ] , where @xmath373 and @xmath374 . thus , @xmath56 has only normal crossings and @xmath375 is a @xmath1-cover . finally , we apply lemma [ lem : remove - codim2 ] to obtain an @xmath4 and g.d.c . cover @xmath0 by taking @xmath4-fication . we obtain @xmath3 by gluing @xmath338 along the involution @xmath376 , i.e. as the pushout of the following commutative diagram : since all varieties are affine over @xmath2 , @xmath48 is the fiber product of the corresponding diagram of @xmath52-algebras , in which we identify sheaves with their pushforwards on @xmath2 . we can rewrite this fiber product diagram by saying that @xmath48 is the kernel in the exact sequence @xmath377 further , we have @xmath378 where @xmath379 is the alternating part ( if @xmath380 then @xmath381 ) , and the image of @xmath382 contains @xmath383 . hence , we have induced exact sequences @xmath384 the thus defined variety @xmath3 is @xmath4 by the next lemma [ lem : sings - after - gluing ] , since @xmath385 is a subsheaf of @xmath379 and so obviously does not have embedded primes . it is g.d.c . again by looking in codimension 1 as in the previous proof . the @xmath1-action on @xmath338 descends to a @xmath1-action on @xmath3 since @xmath354 commutes with the @xmath1-action on @xmath344 and by construction the subalgebra of @xmath1-invariants is the algebra of @xmath386 glued along @xmath387 , i.e. @xmath52 . the varieties @xmath3 obtained in the two proofs coincide , since they both have finite morphisms to @xmath2 , are both @xmath4 and they coincide over an open subset @xmath388 with @xmath389 . [ warn : glue ] it may happen that there is no covering involution of @xmath345 but only of its normalization @xmath390 . then the double locus of @xmath3 is obtained from @xmath391 by some additional gluing in codimension 1 ( codimension 2 for @xmath3 ) . as a consequence , branches of @xmath3 may not be @xmath4 . but the variety @xmath3 is @xmath4 . @xcite contains multiple examples of this phenomenon . on the other hand , the involution @xmath354 need not be unique . for instance , if @xmath165 has order 2 , then @xmath392 is another involution satisfying the assumptions for gluing . the next example shows that gluing via different involutions can give rise to non isomorphic covers . [ ex : pinch ] let @xmath393 . the normalization of @xmath2 is the map @xmath394 defined by @xmath395 . here @xmath396 , @xmath397 and the involution @xmath334 of @xmath335 is given by @xmath398 . let @xmath399 and let @xmath400 be the trivial @xmath401 cover , given by the projection on the coordinates @xmath402 . the @xmath401-action is @xmath403 and @xmath404 . there are two involutions of @xmath344 that lift @xmath334 , namely @xmath405 and @xmath406 . the cover @xmath407 obtained by gluing via @xmath408 is obviously the trivial @xmath401-cover . we describe the cover @xmath409 obtained by gluing via @xmath410 following the second proof of theorem [ thm : glue ] . the map @xmath411 corresponds to the inclusion @xmath412\to \bk[s,\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2 - 1]$ ] and the map @xmath413 corresponds to the surjection @xmath414/(\epsilon^2 - 1 ) \to \bk[s,\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2 - 1]$ ] . the fiber product of these two ring maps can be identified with @xmath415/(\epsilon^2 - 1)\subset \bk[s , t,\epsilon]/(\epsilon^2 - 1)$ ] . the map @xmath416/(x^2-y^2)$ ] defined by @xmath417 , @xmath418 , @xmath419 is an isomorphism , hence @xmath420 is the union of two copies of @xmath421 glued along a line . the cover @xmath409 is given by @xmath422 and the @xmath401-action on @xmath3 is given by @xmath423 , thus @xmath424 is the only branch point . so the ramification locus of a standard @xmath1-cover has always pure codimension 1 but this not true for the @xmath1-covers obtained from a standard cover by gluing and the analogue of lemma [ lem : inertia ] does not hold . [ lem : sings - after - gluing ] with the notations as in the 2nd proof by gluing , assume that @xmath338 is @xmath49 for some @xmath425 . then @xmath3 is @xmath49 iff @xmath385 is @xmath426 . we use the cohomological interpretation of depth using local cohomology @xcite ( alternatively and equivalently one can use @xmath427 ) . a sheaf @xmath186 satisfies @xmath49 iff for every irreducible subvariety @xmath428 one has @xmath429 for all @xmath430 . looking at the long exact sequence of cohomologies corresponding to the short exact sequence , we get @xmath431 for all @xmath432 . the statement now follows . we spell out theorem [ thm : glue ] in a special case , which is of interest to us because of the applications in @xcite . [ ex:2surfaces ] take @xmath106 . for simplicity of exposition , we assume that @xmath433 is the g.d.c . union of two smooth projective surfaces that intersect along a smooth rational curve @xmath21 , but all our considerations generalize straightforwardly to the case of a g.d.c . surface with smooth components whose double locus is a union of smooth rational curves . we have @xmath434 , hence an @xmath4 and g.d.c . @xmath1-cover @xmath339 is the disjoint union of @xmath4 and g.d.c . covers @xmath435 , @xmath182 . by corollary [ cor : structurez2 ] , the covers @xmath436 are standard . we denote by @xmath437 , @xmath438 the branch data of @xmath436 , @xmath182 . we write @xmath439 , @xmath440 and @xmath441 . we denote by @xmath442 the generator of subgroup @xmath443 . an involution @xmath354 of @xmath344 as in theorem [ thm : glue ] exists if and only if there is an isomorphism @xmath444 compatible with the @xmath1-action . this is equivalent to the following conditions : 1 . @xmath445 , 2 . for @xmath446 , denote by @xmath447 the intersection multiplicity at @xmath158 of @xmath448 with @xmath449 , @xmath450 and by @xmath451 the intersection multiplicity at @xmath158 of @xmath452 with @xmath453 , @xmath454 . then : + @xmath455 indeed , ( 1 ) follows immediately by the fact that @xmath354 commutes with the action of @xmath1 . in addition , by the normalization algorithm of @xcite condition ( 2 ) is equivalent to requiring that the branch data of the normalizations @xmath456 and @xmath457 of the @xmath458-coverings of @xmath459 induced by @xmath184 and @xmath185 are the same . since @xmath21 is smooth rational , the branch data are enough to determine the building data ( cf . remark [ rem : branchdata ] ) . since @xmath21 is projective , the building data determine the cover up to isomorphism by proposition [ prop : bdata ] . assume that the gluing conditions are satisfied . giving an involution of @xmath344 that commutes with the @xmath1 action is the same as giving an isomorphism of @xmath1-covers @xmath460 . then any other such map @xmath461 is equal to @xmath462 for some @xmath165 and the automorphism of @xmath463 defined by @xmath464 if @xmath465 and @xmath466 if @xmath467 induces an isomorphism of the cover of @xmath2 obtained by gluing via @xmath468 with the one obtained by gluing via @xmath461 . so in this case all the possible involutions give isomorphic covers . [ thm : the - reverse ] vice versa , every @xmath1-cover @xmath0 with g.d.c . @xmath4 varieties @xmath469 is obtained via the gluing construction of theorem [ thm : glue ] . given @xmath0 and the normalization @xmath470 , let @xmath471 be the fiber product @xmath472 . we define @xmath338 as @xmath473 . thus , @xmath338 is @xmath4 by definition , and it maps to @xmath13 . by the universality of taking the reduced part and @xmath4-fication , there is an induced @xmath1-action on @xmath338 . by the universal property of @xmath1-quotients , we also have a morphism @xmath474 . we claim that it is an isomorphism . it is enough to check this in codimension one over the double locus . we claim that generically over the double locus of @xmath2 , the cover is ( smooth ) @xmath366 ( admissible action of curves ) , where `` admissible '' means that , working tale - locally , @xmath3 is given by @xmath206 , and the action is @xmath368 , @xmath369 for some primitive root @xmath360 and @xmath361 . indeed , let @xmath78 be the subgroup of elements that restrict to the identity on an irreducible component @xmath75 of the double locus of @xmath3 . then on the normalization on both branches we have the same subgroup for the preimages @xmath244 and @xmath475 . since generically @xmath476 are smooth , @xmath477 for some @xmath478 ( note that one possibly has @xmath479 ) . thus , tale locally the morphism @xmath0 can be written as @xmath480/(uv)\to \bk[x , y]/(xy ) , \qquad u\mapsto x^n,\ v\mapsto y^n,\ ] ] where @xmath1 acts as @xmath368 , @xmath369 , @xmath360 , @xmath361 . computing , we get that @xmath471 corresponds to ( smooth)@xmath481/(xy , y^n ) \oplus \bk[x , y]/(xy , x^n)$ ] , and @xmath338 to @xmath482\oplus \bk[y]$ ] . the quotient @xmath483 is then @xmath484\oplus \bk[v]$ ] , i.e. @xmath13 . this proves that @xmath485 is an isomorphism outside a closed subset of codimension @xmath355 . since both are finite over @xmath2 and @xmath4 , @xmath277 is an isomorphism . let @xmath245 be a variety , let @xmath486 , @xmath487 , be effective weil divisors on @xmath3 , possibly reducible , and let @xmath488 be rational numbers with @xmath489 . set @xmath490 . [ defn : lc ] assume that @xmath245 is a _ normal _ variety . then @xmath245 has a canonical weil divisor @xmath491 defined up to linear equivalence . the pair @xmath492 is called _ log canonical _ if 1 . @xmath493 is @xmath494-cartier , i.e. some positive multiple is a cartier divisor , and 2 . every prime divisor of @xmath245 has multiplicity @xmath208 in @xmath495 and for every proper birational morphism @xmath496 with normal @xmath497 , in the natural formula @xmath498 one has @xmath499 . here , @xmath500 are the irreducible exceptional divisors of @xmath501 , the pullback @xmath502 is defined by extending @xmath494-linearly the pullback on cartier divisors , @xmath503 is the strict preimage of @xmath495 . the coefficients @xmath504 are called _ discrepancies_. for the non - exceptional divisors , already appearing on @xmath245 , one defines @xmath505 . + if @xmath506 , then @xmath245 has a resolution of singularities @xmath496 such that @xmath507 is a normal crossing divisor ; then it is sufficient to check the condition @xmath508 for this morphism @xmath501 only . a pair @xmath492 is called _ semi log canonical _ if 1 . @xmath245 satisfies serre s condition @xmath4 , 2 . @xmath245 is g.d.c . , and no divisor @xmath486 contains any component of the double locus of @xmath245 , 3 . some multiple of the weil @xmath494-divisor @xmath493 , well defined thanks to the previous condition , is cartier , and 4 . denoting by @xmath509 the normalization , the pair @xmath510 is log canonical . [ lem : adjunction ] let @xmath511 be a finite morphism of degree @xmath145 between equidimensional @xmath4 varieties . assume that either @xmath512 , or @xmath152 is galois and @xmath513 does not divide @xmath145 . let @xmath57 be an open subset and denote by @xmath514 the induced cover . assume that : * @xmath515 and both @xmath56 and @xmath57 are d.c . , * there exist effective @xmath516-divisors @xmath517 of @xmath3 and @xmath518 of @xmath2 , not containing any component of the double locus , such that @xmath519 , where @xmath520 is the restriction of @xmath518 to @xmath57 and @xmath521 is the restriction of @xmath517 to @xmath56 . then : 1 . @xmath522 is @xmath516-cartier iff so is @xmath523 . 2 . the pair @xmath524 is slc iff so is the pair @xmath525 . \(1 ) let @xmath526 be the inclusion map . if the sheaf @xmath527 is invertible then we have a homomorphism @xmath528 which is an isomorphism outside of codimension 2 . so it must be an isomorphism by the @xmath4 condition . similarly , if the sheaf @xmath529 is invertible then the sheaf @xmath530 is isomorphic to the norm of @xmath531 , so is invertible . \(2 ) assume first that @xmath3 and @xmath2 are normal . in the case this statement , due to shokurov , is very well known . we recall the proof because usually it is only stated and proved in characteristic zero . let @xmath532 be some partial resolution with normal @xmath533 , @xmath338 be the normalization of @xmath534 , and let @xmath535 , @xmath536 be the induced maps . pick an irreducible divisor @xmath537 on @xmath533 , and let @xmath75 be an irreducible divisor on @xmath338 over it . by our condition on @xmath513 , the field extension @xmath538 is separable , and if @xmath539 , @xmath540 are uniformizing parameters in the dvrs @xmath541 and @xmath542 , then one has @xmath543 for a unit @xmath312 and some integer @xmath544 dividing @xmath145 and hence coprime to @xmath513 . then riemann - hurwitz formula applies and says that generically along @xmath537 and @xmath75 one has @xmath545 . comparing this to the identity @xmath546 and the definition of the log discrepancy , one obtains that @xmath547 . thus , @xmath548 @xmath549 @xmath550 . this proves that @xmath551 is lc iff @xmath524 is lc . now consider the general g.d.c . let @xmath552 be the normalization . we have @xmath553 and similarly for @xmath2 . thus , the double loci appear in the divisors @xmath554 , @xmath555 with coefficient 1 . by the riemann - hurwitz formula again , for the normalizations we still have @xmath556 . we conclude by applying the normal case . we now extend definition [ defn : hurwitz ] of hurwitz divisor to the case of a g.d.c . base @xmath2 : [ defn : hurwitz2 ] let @xmath51 be a @xmath1-cover of @xmath4 and g.d.c . varieties . for a prime weil divisor @xmath557 , we define @xmath558 as follows : * if @xmath75 is contained in the double locus of @xmath2 , then @xmath559 ; * if @xmath75 is not contained in the double locus of @xmath2 , but @xmath76 is contained in the double locus of @xmath3 , then @xmath560 , * if @xmath75 is not contained in the double locus of @xmath2 , @xmath76 is not contained in the double locus of @xmath3 and @xmath104 is the ramification order of @xmath41 at @xmath75 , then @xmath561 . we define the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 of @xmath41 to be the @xmath204-divisor @xmath562 . notice that if @xmath0 is a standard @xmath1-cover with @xmath3 g.d.c . this definition coincides with definition [ defn : hurwitz ] by theorem [ thm : structure ] . note that @xmath32 does not contain any components of the double locus of @xmath2 . [ prop : interesting - case ] let @xmath51 be a @xmath1-cover as in definition [ defn : hurwitz2 ] and let @xmath32 be the hurwitz divisor of @xmath41 , let @xmath339 be the corresponding @xmath4 and g.d.c . @xmath1-cover ( cf. [ ssec : ynonnormal ] ) then 1 . @xmath563 is @xmath516-cartier iff so is @xmath564 , and then @xmath565 . 2 . @xmath3 is slc iff so is the pair @xmath566 . recall that @xmath567 and @xmath568 are coprime by assumption . so lemma [ lem : adjunction ] applies and we may assume that @xmath2 is d.c .. we need to show that @xmath569 this is equivalent to the following equality for the cover @xmath570 , where @xmath19 is the normalization of @xmath338 ( and of @xmath3 ) : @xmath571 in view of definition [ defn : hurwitz2 ] the formula follows easily by the usual hurwitz formula . by lemma [ lem : flatness - and - cm ] , a @xmath1-cover over a smooth base is cm . here , we give a partial generalization of this case to the case of a non - normal base . we use the notations of theorem [ thm : glue ] and the exact sequence . [ prop : cm ] assume that @xmath338 is cm ( for example , @xmath13 is smooth ) . then @xmath3 is cm iff the sheaf @xmath385 is cm . immediate by lemma [ lem : sings - after - gluing ] . using proposition [ prop : cm ] it is not hard to give examples of abelian covers @xmath0 such that @xmath2 is cm and g.d.c . , and @xmath3 is g.d.c . and @xmath4 but not cm : [ ex : noncm ] we take @xmath572 and assume @xmath573 ; for any prime @xmath574 one can construct similar examples with @xmath575 and @xmath576 . let @xmath433 be the union of 2 copies of @xmath577 glued transversally along a plane @xmath21 . let @xmath578 and @xmath579 be distinct lines on @xmath21 and for @xmath182 let @xmath580 be a quadric that restricts to @xmath581 on @xmath21 . for a generic choice , @xmath85 is a quadric cone with vertex @xmath582 and the points @xmath583 , @xmath584 and @xmath585 are distinct . let @xmath586 be the double cover of @xmath7 branched on @xmath85 and let @xmath587 . then @xmath338 is gorenstein , has an ordinary double point over @xmath583 and @xmath584 and no other singularity . write @xmath588 and @xmath440 ; then @xmath589 is the union of two copies of @xmath590 glued transversally along @xmath591 and @xmath592 is the trivial @xmath401-cover . hence there exists an involution @xmath354 of @xmath344 that commutes with the @xmath401-action , and by theorem [ thm : glue ] @xmath338 can be glued to an @xmath4 and g.d.c . cover @xmath0 . locus of @xmath3 is the complement of the preimage of @xmath593 . in the exact sequence each term splits under the @xmath1-action and the maps are compatible with the splitting , so we get two exact sequences , one for each character of @xmath1 . since @xmath594 and @xmath401 acts on @xmath379 by switching the two summands , the sequence for the nontrivial character is : @xmath595 where @xmath596 ( resp . @xmath597 ) is the antiinvariant summand of @xmath598 ( resp . of @xmath379 ) . by definition , the map @xmath599 factorizes as @xmath600 . hence , @xmath601 coincides with @xmath602 , the maximal ideal of @xmath603 in @xmath21 , and therefore it is not @xmath4 . it follows by proposition [ prop : cm ] that @xmath3 is not cm over @xmath603 . let @xmath604 be a point distinct from @xmath603 ; in a neighbourhood of @xmath605 we have @xmath606 , thus @xmath607 is not @xmath516-cartier . since @xmath2 is gorenstein , it follows that @xmath608 is not @xmath516-cartier either , hence @xmath563 is not @xmath516-cartier by proposition [ prop : interesting - case ] . all the statements in this section are tale local , so we often pass to a smaller neighbourhood of a point without explicit mention of the fact . for convenience , we write `` @xmath563 '' to denote the divisorial sheaf @xmath609 ( recall that @xmath3 is gorenstein in codimension 1 and @xmath4 ) . we also use the additive notation @xmath607 for the sheaf @xmath610 . we consider the following situation : * @xmath2 is a normal variety and @xmath21 is a reduced effective divisor on @xmath2 such that @xmath611 is cartier ; * @xmath51 is a standard g.d.c . @xmath1-cover ( so @xmath3 is automatically @xmath4 by lemma [ lem : flatness - and - cm ] ) . we assume that @xmath3 is generically smooth over @xmath21 and we denote by @xmath495 the preimage of @xmath21 in @xmath3 . so @xmath495 is also a reduced effective divisor . let @xmath32 be the hurwitz divisor of @xmath41 ; then we have : @xmath612 thus , if @xmath145 is the exponent of @xmath1 , then the divisor @xmath613 is cartier ( recall that the divisors @xmath85 are cartier by the definition of a standard cover in section [ ssec : standard ] ) and thus @xmath614 is also cartier . fix a point @xmath42 ; the purpose of this section is to compute the cartier index of @xmath615 at a point @xmath160 such that @xmath616 . here we are interested mainly in the case @xmath617 , but the case of a pair is needed in the next section to treat the case @xmath2 non - normal . in order to state our result we need some notation . we label the branch data @xmath618 , @xmath619 , in such a way that @xmath620 iff @xmath621 . since the question is local on @xmath2 we may assume that @xmath164 for every @xmath163 . consider the map @xmath622 . by lemma [ lem : inertia ] the image of this map is the inertia subgroup @xmath157 ; we denote by @xmath623 the kernel . we let @xmath624 be the character @xmath625 . since the group @xmath1 is finite abelian , the map @xmath626 is surjective . so the character @xmath627 is the pullback of a character of @xmath157 iff it is the pullback of a character of @xmath1 . [ prop : index - normal ] notation and assumptions as above . + the cartier index of @xmath615 at @xmath166 is equal to the order of @xmath628 . in particular , @xmath615 is cartier iff @xmath627 is the pull back of a character @xmath167 . since the question is local , we may assume that the line bundles @xmath11 , @xmath629 and @xmath630 are trivial . the map @xmath631 is tale , hence up to replacing @xmath2 by @xmath632 we may assume that @xmath633 , or , equivalently , that @xmath634 . we denote by @xmath635 local equations of @xmath84 near @xmath158 . by remark [ rem : local ] , up to passing to an tale cover of @xmath2 we may assume that @xmath3 is given by : @xmath636 the equations : @xmath637 define inside @xmath638 a @xmath639-cover @xmath640 ( @xmath639 acts on @xmath641 via the character @xmath89 ) , the _ maximal totally ramified cover _ of @xmath2 with branch data @xmath642 ( here we regard @xmath87 as a subgroup of @xmath639 ) . since @xmath2 is g.d.c . by assumption and @xmath0 and @xmath640 have the same hurwitz divisor , @xmath643 is also g.d.c . by theorem [ thm : structure ] . for every @xmath167 , write @xmath644 , with @xmath645 for @xmath619 ; then setting @xmath646 defines a map @xmath647 which is the quotient map for the action of the kernel @xmath623 of @xmath648 . the map @xmath574 is unramified in codimension 1 and @xmath649 consists of just one point @xmath650 . denote by @xmath651 the preimage of @xmath21 ( and of @xmath495 ) in @xmath643 ; observe that @xmath652 pulls back to @xmath615 on @xmath3 and to @xmath653 on @xmath643 . if @xmath654 is a generator of @xmath630 then @xmath655 is generated by the residue @xmath656 on @xmath643 of the rational differential form : @xmath657 thus @xmath655 is invertible and @xmath1 acts on the local generator @xmath658 via the character @xmath659 . set @xmath660 . the map @xmath661 is unramified in codimension 1 and @xmath658 descends on @xmath245 to a generator of @xmath662 , where @xmath663 is the image of @xmath651 . the map @xmath664 is a cyclic cover with galois group @xmath665 with the following properties : * it is unramified in codimension 1 and the preimage of @xmath166 consists only of one point , * the pull back of @xmath666 is a line bundle on which the galois group acts via a primitive character . it follows that @xmath664 is a canonical cover and that the cartier index of @xmath615 at @xmath166 is equal to @xmath667 $ ] . [ cor : gor - smooth ] let @xmath668 be a standard abelian with @xmath3 and @xmath2 g.d.c . and @xmath2 gorenstein , let @xmath42 and let @xmath160 be a point such that @xmath616 . then @xmath3 is gorenstein at @xmath166 iff the character @xmath669 descends to a character @xmath12 of @xmath157 . @xmath3 is cohen - macaulay by lemma [ lem : flatness - and - cm ] and @xmath563 is cartier by proposition [ prop : index - normal ] . corollary [ cor : gor - smooth ] is proven in @xcite under the assumption that @xmath3 is normal and @xmath2 is smooth . here we consider the problem of determining the cartier index of @xmath563 at a point @xmath160 of a @xmath1-cover @xmath0 with @xmath2 non - normal of cartier index 1 . the situation is much more complicated than in the case @xmath2 normal and we are able to give only a partial answer , that is however sufficient for the applications in @xcite . the main difficulty is that one does not know how to write down an analogue of the maximal totally ramified cover used in the proof of proposition [ prop : index - normal ] . we consider the following setup : * @xmath670 , where @xmath7 is irreducible for @xmath173 , is a g.d.c . and @xmath4 variety ; @xmath671 is the normalization , * @xmath51 is an @xmath4 and g.d.c . @xmath1-cover obtained by gluing a cover @xmath672 such that @xmath673 is standard for every @xmath163 , * @xmath42 and @xmath160 are points such that @xmath616 ; we assume that @xmath158 lies on every component of the branch locus of @xmath41 . we denote by @xmath618 , @xmath619 the branch data of the standard cover @xmath674 and we assume that @xmath85 is contained in the preimage @xmath332 of the double locus of @xmath2 if and only if @xmath621 . consider the map @xmath622 . as in the case @xmath2 normal , we denote by @xmath675 the character @xmath625 . then : [ prop : index - non - normal ] in the above setup , if @xmath563 is cartier , then : 1 . @xmath564 is @xmath204-cartier , 2 . @xmath669 is the pullback of a character @xmath167 . \(1 ) follows immediately by proposition [ prop : interesting - case ] . \(2 ) for every @xmath173 denote by @xmath676 ( resp . @xmath677 ) the preimage of the double locus of @xmath2 in @xmath678 ( resp . in @xmath679 ) . let @xmath167 be the character via which @xmath1 acts on @xmath680 at @xmath166 . let @xmath681 be a point that maps to @xmath166 and let @xmath682 be the image of @xmath683 in @xmath678 . since @xmath563 pulls back to @xmath684 on @xmath679 , the inertia subgroup @xmath685 acts on @xmath686 via the restriction of @xmath12 . set @xmath687 and let @xmath688 be the restriction of @xmath669 to @xmath689 ; the map @xmath690 is a surjection by lemma [ lem : inertia ] . by the proof of proposition [ prop : index - normal ] @xmath12 pulls back on @xmath689 to @xmath688 . since @xmath691 , it follows that @xmath12 pulls back to @xmath669 on @xmath639 . we now prove a partial converse of proposition [ prop : index - non - normal ] . assume that for every component @xmath678 of @xmath13 the map @xmath692 induces a homeomorphism @xmath693 onto its image ( this is always true up to an tale cover ) . then we associate to @xmath201 an incidence graph @xmath694 as follows : the vertices of @xmath694 are indexed by the branches of @xmath201 , the edges are indexed by the components of the double locus @xmath21 of @xmath2 , the edge corresponding to a component @xmath75 of @xmath21 connects the vertices corresponding to the two branches of @xmath2 through @xmath75 . [ prop : index - graph ] in the above setup , assume that : 1 . the graph @xmath694 is a tree , 2 . @xmath695 is cartier and there exists @xmath104 such that @xmath696 is cartier and @xmath697 , 3 . @xmath669 is the pullback of a character @xmath167 . then @xmath563 is cartier . let @xmath698 the restriction of the double locus @xmath332 of @xmath386 and let @xmath677 be the preimage of @xmath590 . let @xmath699 be the only point that maps to @xmath42 ; let @xmath700 and @xmath701 be defined as in the proof of proposition [ prop : index - non - normal ] . by assumption ( 3 ) , the divisor @xmath684 is cartier by proposition [ prop : index - normal ] . by the following lemma [ lem : character ] , up to replacing @xmath201 by an tale neighbourhood we may assume that for @xmath173 the sheaf @xmath702 is trivial and has a generator @xmath136 on which @xmath1 acts via @xmath12 . by proposition [ prop : interesting - case ] , there exists a local generator @xmath654 of @xmath703 near @xmath166 . for every @xmath163 , by lemma [ lem : character ] , @xmath654 pulls back on @xmath679 to @xmath704 where @xmath705 is a nowhere vanishing regular function on @xmath678 . up to passing to an tale cover of @xmath2 we may assume that @xmath705 has an @xmath104-th root @xmath706 for every @xmath163 . so we may replace @xmath136 by @xmath707 and assume that @xmath654 pulls back to @xmath708 for every @xmath163 . now let @xmath62 be an open set such that @xmath709 is d.c . and the complement of @xmath709 has codimension @xmath710 . let @xmath75 be an irreducible component of the double locus @xmath21 of @xmath2 and let @xmath711 , @xmath712 be the components of @xmath2 that contain @xmath75 . choose an irreducible component @xmath537 of the inverse image of @xmath75 in @xmath709 . it makes sense to compare @xmath713 and @xmath714 along @xmath537 , since they both restrict to local generators of @xmath715 . since @xmath716 , there exists @xmath717 such that @xmath718 along @xmath537 . since @xmath1 acts on @xmath713 and @xmath714 via the same character @xmath12 and @xmath1 acts transitively on the components of the preimage of @xmath75 , @xmath719 depends only on @xmath75 . so @xmath720 represents a class in @xmath721 . since @xmath694 is a tree , we can find @xmath722 such that the local generators @xmath723 glue to give a local generator @xmath658 of @xmath724 on which @xmath1 acts via @xmath12 . we complete the proof of proposition [ prop : index - graph ] by proving the following : [ lem : character ] let @xmath725 be a standard @xmath1-cover with building data @xmath726 . let @xmath727 be a point and let @xmath231 be the inertia subgroup of @xmath255 . let @xmath82 be a @xmath1-linearized line bundle of @xmath245 , let @xmath728 be a point that maps to @xmath255 and let @xmath729 be the character via which @xmath231 acts on @xmath730 . then : 1 . let @xmath167 be such that @xmath731 ; then , up to replacing @xmath732 by an tale neighbourhood of @xmath255 , there exists a generator @xmath656 of @xmath82 such that @xmath1 acts on @xmath656 via the character @xmath12 ; 2 . @xmath656 is uniquely determined by @xmath12 up to multiplication by a nowhere vanishing regular function of @xmath732 . \(2 ) assume that @xmath733 are generators of @xmath82 on which @xmath1 acts via the character @xmath12 . then @xmath734 is a regular @xmath231-invariant function on @xmath245 , so it is a function on @xmath732 . \(1 ) we break the proof into three steps . let @xmath210 be a generator of @xmath82 near @xmath254 . the group @xmath231 acts on the vector space @xmath735 of local sections of @xmath82 spanned by the elements @xmath736 , @xmath737 . @xmath735 is finite - dimensional , and decomposes under the @xmath1-action as a direct sum of eigenspaces . since @xmath738 and @xmath739 , there exists an eigenvector @xmath740 such that @xmath741 . since @xmath1 acts on @xmath730 via @xmath12 , @xmath658 belongs to the eigenspace corresponding to @xmath12 . consider the factorization @xmath742 . the map @xmath743 is an @xmath231-cover such that the preimage of @xmath255 consists of one point @xmath744 . the subgroup @xmath623 acts freely on @xmath245 , hence @xmath82 descends to an @xmath231-linearized line bundle @xmath531 on @xmath497 . then by step 1 there exists a local generator @xmath745 of @xmath531 near @xmath746 such that @xmath231 acts on @xmath745 via @xmath277 . pulling back to @xmath245 we get a generator @xmath654 of @xmath82 on which @xmath231 acts via @xmath277 and @xmath623 acts trivially . denote by @xmath747 the restriction of @xmath12 to @xmath623 , so that @xmath748 . consider the factorization @xmath749 . the map @xmath750 is a tale @xmath623-cover . so there exists a nowhere vanishing function @xmath152 on @xmath751 such that @xmath623 acts on @xmath152 via the character @xmath277 . thus @xmath1 acts on @xmath752 via the character @xmath12 . choose a finite abelian group @xmath623 with a surjective map @xmath753 that extends the inclusion @xmath754 and let @xmath755 be the kernel of @xmath756 . by proposition [ prop : bdata ] , up to replacing @xmath732 by an tale neighbourhood of @xmath255 , we may also assume ( cf . ) that @xmath757 is given inside @xmath758 by the equations : @xmath759 where @xmath760 is a local equation for @xmath85 , @xmath619 . the branch data for @xmath245 can be interpreted in an obvious way as branch data for a @xmath761-cover . letting @xmath762 be the @xmath761-cover given by the equations analogous to , we have @xmath763 by construction . let @xmath764 be the pull back of @xmath82 to @xmath765 . @xmath764 has a natural @xmath761-linearization and @xmath231 is a direct summand of @xmath761 , hence by step 2 there exists a generator @xmath766 of @xmath764 on which @xmath761 acts via the character @xmath767 of @xmath761 induced by @xmath12 . since @xmath755 acts freely on @xmath765 and @xmath768 by construction , @xmath766 descends to a generator @xmath658 of @xmath82 on @xmath245 on which @xmath1 acts via @xmath12 . in this section we make a detailed study of @xmath6-covers of surfaces . we use freely the notation introduced in [ ssec : ynormal ] . in particular , we refer the reader to the commutative diagram ( [ big - diagram ] ) and theorem [ thm : glue ] . * @xmath2 is a g.d.c . surface with smooth irreducible components @xmath769 . the irreducible components @xmath770 of the double curve @xmath21 of @xmath2 are smooth , @xmath2 is d.c . at the smooth points of @xmath21 and it is analytically isomorphic to the cone over a cycle of rational curves at the singular points of @xmath21 . in particular , @xmath2 is gorenstein . * @xmath106 and @xmath51 is a @xmath1-cover with @xmath3 g.d.c . and @xmath4 , obtained as in theorem [ thm : glue ] by gluing a cover @xmath771 such that for every @xmath772 the restricted cover @xmath435 is standard with building data @xmath773 , @xmath774 . * the @xmath775 and the components of the double curve @xmath332 are `` lines '' of @xmath2 , namely they are smooth and meet pairwise transversally . * the intersection points of the support of the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 of @xmath41 with the double curve @xmath21 of @xmath2 are smooth points of @xmath21 . * @xmath564 ( or , equivalently , @xmath32 , since @xmath2 is gorenstein ) is @xmath776-cartier and the pair @xmath566 is slc , so that by proposition [ prop : interesting - case ] @xmath3 is slc and @xmath563 is @xmath776-cartier . recall that , since we assume that the components of @xmath777 and of @xmath332 are lines , the pair @xmath566 is slc iff on @xmath13 the divisor @xmath778 has components of multiplicity @xmath208 and has multiplicity @xmath779 at every point . * for every @xmath42 that is singular for @xmath21 , label the components @xmath780 of @xmath2 containing @xmath158 in such a way that for every @xmath781 the surfaces @xmath7 and @xmath782 meet along an irreducible curve @xmath783 containing @xmath158 ( the indices are taken modulo @xmath784 ) and let @xmath107 be the generator of the inertia subgroup of @xmath783 . by theorem [ thm : glue ] , for every @xmath163 we have @xmath785 . we assume that the natural map @xmath786 is an isomorphism for every @xmath781 . + these conditions imply that the fibre of @xmath0 over @xmath158 consists of @xmath787 points . at each of these points @xmath3 is analytically isomorphic to the cone over a cycle of @xmath784 smooth rational curves . to compute the cohomology of @xmath790 , we are going to write down explicitly in the above situation the sequences in the second proof of theorem [ thm : glue ] ( as usual we push forward to @xmath2 all the sheaves ) . since all the maps are @xmath1-equivariant , the sequences split as sums of exact sequences : @xmath791 where @xmath12 varies in @xmath17 and @xmath1 acts in @xmath40 , @xmath792 and @xmath793 via @xmath12 . to describe the sheaves @xmath792 and @xmath793 , we need to introduce some more notation . given a component @xmath794 of @xmath21 we denote by @xmath795 the generator of the inertia subgroup of @xmath794 and by @xmath796 and @xmath797 the two components of @xmath2 that contain @xmath794 . we denote by @xmath798 ( resp . @xmath799 , @xmath800 ) the preimages of @xmath794 in @xmath3 ( resp . @xmath801 ) and by @xmath802 the common normalization of @xmath798 , @xmath799 , @xmath800 ( cf . example [ ex:2surfaces ] ) . in the following commutative diagram : * we identify @xmath806 with @xmath807 and for every @xmath808 we restrict @xmath809 to @xmath794 , * for every @xmath810 with @xmath811 , we label each point of @xmath812 with the image of @xmath813 in @xmath803 . the same can be done of course for @xmath814 . let @xmath815 be a point such that @xmath777 has multiplicity 1 at the points of @xmath386 that map to @xmath158 ( since we assume that @xmath816 is cartier , the multiplicity of @xmath777 is the same at all points lying over @xmath158 ) . recall that by assumption @xmath2 is d.c . at @xmath158 ; denote by @xmath817 @xmath818 the elements of @xmath1 associated to the two branch lines of @xmath819 containing @xmath158 and by @xmath820 , @xmath821 the elements of @xmath1 associated to the two branch lines of @xmath822 containing @xmath158 . we have @xmath823 modulo @xmath824 ( cf . example [ ex:2surfaces ] ) . then @xmath825 is singular over @xmath158 iff @xmath817 and @xmath818 are both different from @xmath824 , namely iff there exists a character @xmath12 with @xmath826 and @xmath827 . for each @xmath167 and @xmath828 such that @xmath826 we denote by @xmath829 the set of points @xmath830 such that @xmath827 , and we take @xmath829 to be the empty set if @xmath831 . we define in a similar way @xmath832 by considering the cover @xmath833 . we have the following : in our setup , the map @xmath845 is the disjoint union of two copies of @xmath846 that are switched by the involution @xmath354 . so by lemma [ lem : data - c ] the first sequence in can be rewritten as : @xmath847 in addition , if @xmath794 is a component of @xmath21 contained in @xmath796 and @xmath797 , then again by lemma [ lem : data - c ] the image of the map @xmath848 is equal to @xmath849 , so we have an exact sequence : @xmath850 where the cokernel @xmath851 is concentrated on the set @xmath840 . using the description of the singularities of @xmath3 at these points given in [ ssec : setup - z2 ] , one checks that @xmath851 has length 1 at points @xmath158 such that @xmath841 is trivial and it is 0 elsewhere , so @xmath852 . [ rem : inertia ] let @xmath446 be a smooth point , let @xmath75 be the irreducible component of @xmath21 that contains @xmath158 and let @xmath853 , @xmath854 be the two components of @xmath2 that contain @xmath75 . let @xmath231 the subgroup of @xmath1 generated by the inertia subgroups of @xmath75 and of the components of @xmath32 that contain @xmath158 . of course one has @xmath855 , but in the present setup equality actually holds . indeed , if @xmath856 is a non trivial character , then by proposition [ prop : fchi ] the second sequence in can be written near @xmath158 as @xmath857 , where @xmath858 is given by @xmath859 . by lemma [ lem : inertia ] , there exist @xmath860 , @xmath182 , that correspond to functions on @xmath679 that do not vanish at any point of @xmath861 . up to multiplying , say , @xmath862 by a nowhere vanishing regular function on @xmath853 we can arrange that @xmath863 . so @xmath137 corresponds to a function on @xmath3 that is nonzero near @xmath861 and on which @xmath1 acts via the character @xmath12 . it follows that @xmath864 acts freely on @xmath861 , i.e. that @xmath865 . we say that a point @xmath446 is _ relevant _ iff either it is singular for @xmath21 or there exists @xmath828 , @xmath12 with @xmath826 such that @xmath866 . observe that , in view of the assumptions of [ ssec : setup - z2 ] , by proposition [ prop : index - graph ] and by the description of singularities of [ subsec : sings - red - base ] the set of relevant points can be described intrinsically as the set of points of @xmath21 over which @xmath3 is gorenstein but not d.c .. [ ex1 ] let @xmath871 , let @xmath872 be the nonzero elements of @xmath1 and for @xmath873 let @xmath874 be the nonzero character such that @xmath875 . let @xmath876 , @xmath877 and let @xmath2 be the surface obtained by gluing @xmath853 and @xmath854 along a smooth rational curve @xmath21 which is of type @xmath878 on @xmath853 and is a line on @xmath854 . fix three distinct points @xmath879 . for @xmath873 , let @xmath880 be the union of a fibre and a section through @xmath881 and let @xmath882 be a pair of lines through @xmath883 ( the index @xmath354 varies in @xmath884 ) . in the picture below @xmath853 is represented on the left and @xmath854 on the right , the curve @xmath21 is shown in green , red lines correspond to @xmath885 , black lines to @xmath886 and blue lines to @xmath887 . for @xmath182 , we let @xmath435 be the standard @xmath1-cover with branch data @xmath888 , @xmath813 , @xmath889 . solving , we get @xmath890 and @xmath891 , @xmath889 , where @xmath892 denotes the subsheaf of @xmath893 corresponding to the character @xmath112 . notice that the line bundles @xmath892 have no cohomology , hence in particular @xmath894 . by @xcite , for @xmath182 the normalization of the cover of @xmath21 induced by @xmath436 is the trivial @xmath1-cover . so by theorem [ thm : glue ] , we can glue @xmath895 to a cover @xmath51 . by we have : @xmath896 the curve @xmath21 is smooth and the points @xmath897 and @xmath603 are relevant points with @xmath898 , so corollary [ cor : chi ] gives : @xmath899+[g : h_{y_2}]+[g : h_{y_3}]=1 + 1 - 4 + 1 + 1 + 1=1.\ ] ] for @xmath142 , we have an isomorphism @xmath900 , hence @xmath901 has no cohomology in degree @xmath902 and the exact sequence : @xmath903 implies that @xmath904 for @xmath902 . next we compute the cohomology of the sheaves @xmath40 . by proposition [ prop : fchi ] , for @xmath889 we have @xmath905 . so gives an exact sequence : @xmath906 therefore @xmath907 for @xmath889 and thus @xmath908 . as in the previous example , let @xmath871 and for @xmath911 let @xmath435 be the @xmath1-cover branched on the colored lines in the picture . for every @xmath163 , two of the sheaves @xmath912 are @xmath913 and the remaining one is @xmath914 . so the @xmath915 have no cohomology and @xmath916 . it s easy to check using theorem [ thm : glue ] that the cover @xmath917 can be glued to a @xmath1-cover @xmath51 . the normalization @xmath918 of the induced cover of the double curve @xmath21 is the disjoint union of 6 smooth rational curves , each mapping 2-to-1 onto a component of @xmath21 . the only relevant point is the singular point @xmath158 of @xmath21 . so applying and corollary [ cor : chi ] , we get : @xmath919 let @xmath920 be the irreducible components of @xmath21 . for @xmath142 , as in the proof of corollary [ cor : chi ] we have an exact sequence : @xmath921 which gives @xmath922 for @xmath902 . by proposition [ prop : fchi ] , for @xmath923 the sheaf @xmath924 is isomorphic to the direct sum of two copies of @xmath925 , hence it has no higher cohomology . so by we have @xmath926 for @xmath902 and therefore @xmath908 . we wish describe the singularities of a @xmath6-cover @xmath927 as in [ ssec : setup - z2 ] . since the question is local , we fix @xmath42 and we study @xmath3 locally above @xmath2 in the tale topology . by the assumptions in [ ssec : setup - z2 ] , the singularities of @xmath3 over a point @xmath42 lying on @xmath928 components of @xmath2 are degenerate cusps such that the exceptional divisor of its minimal semiresolution is a cycle of @xmath784 rational curves ( cf . * def . 4.20 ) ) . so it is enough to analyze two cases : all the singularities listed in tables [ tab : reduced - lines][tab : r - d12non ] , actually occur on some stable surface of general type . to give examples of the singularities that appear when the base @xmath2 of the cover is smooth , one can take @xmath106 , @xmath929 , a set of generators @xmath930 of @xmath1 , @xmath931 , and lines @xmath932 through a point @xmath933 such that the pair @xmath934 is lc . if @xmath935 , define @xmath936 , where @xmath937 is a general curve of even degree and for @xmath938 let @xmath320 be a general curve of odd degree . the divisors @xmath320 so defined are the branch data for a @xmath1-cover @xmath939 ( equations are easily seen have a solution in this case ) . by proposition [ prop : interesting - case ] the surface @xmath3 is slc and it is of general type as soon as the the degree of the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 is @xmath940 . there is only one point @xmath160 that maps to @xmath158 and all the singularities listed in tables 1 , 2 and 3 with can be realized as @xmath941 in this way and @xmath942 ( for the definition of @xmath231 , see below ) . the singularities with @xmath943 can be obtained by taking a double cover @xmath944 , branched on the sum of @xmath154 lines through @xmath158 and a general curve of degree @xmath145 such that @xmath945 is even and @xmath946 . we let @xmath949 be the branch data of @xmath41 . we may assume that @xmath164 for every @xmath163 . so by the condition that @xmath32 is slc we have @xmath931 and no three of the @xmath85 coincide . whenever the @xmath85 are not all distinct , we assume @xmath950 . all the possible cases are listed in tables [ tab : reduced - lines ] , [ tab : one - double - line ] , [ tab : two - double - lines ] below . the first digit in the label given to each case is equal to the number @xmath154 of components through @xmath158 , followed by @xmath951 if @xmath950 and by @xmath952 if @xmath950 and @xmath953 ( obviously this case occurs only for @xmath954 ) . so , for instance , a label of the form @xmath955 , where @xmath104 is any positive integer , means that @xmath158 belongs to three components of @xmath32 , two of which coincide . * @xmath956 : the order of the subgroup @xmath231 the subgroup generated by @xmath930 . * _ relations : _ describes the relations between @xmath957 . for instance , @xmath958 means @xmath959 . * _ singularity : _ the notations are mostly standard . @xmath960 denotes a cyclic singularity @xmath961 with weights 1,1 . @xmath962 denotes an arrangement consisting of four disjoint @xmath963-curves @xmath964 and of a smooth rational curve @xmath75 intersecting each of the @xmath965 transversely at one point . the self intersection @xmath966 is given in the table . in the non - normal case ( tables 2 and 3 ) we use the notations of @xcite , where kollr and shepherd - barron classified all slc surface singularities over @xmath967 . we work in any characteristic @xmath968 but only the singularities from the list in @xcite appear . `` deg.cusp@xmath969 '' means a degenerate cusp ( cf . * def . 4.20 ) ) such that the exceptional divisor in the minimal semiresolution has @xmath154 components . * @xmath334 : the index of @xmath160 . it is equal to 1 if all the relations have even length and it is equal to 2 otherwise ( cf . proposition [ prop : index - normal ] ) . * @xmath19 : denotes the normalization of @xmath3 ( the entries refer to the cases in table 1 ) . * @xmath970 : @xmath971 is the inverse image in @xmath972 of the double curve @xmath973 of @xmath3 and @xmath974 is the image of @xmath973 in @xmath2 . the symbol @xmath975 denotes the germ of a smooth curve , and @xmath976 is the seminormal curve obtained by gluing @xmath154 copies of @xmath975 at one point . the notation @xmath977 means that the map restricts to a degree @xmath504 map on the @xmath163-th component of @xmath976 ( we do not specify the @xmath504 when they are all equal to 1 ) . * @xmath978 : is the minimal semiresolution of @xmath3 . we write `` d.c . '' when @xmath978 has only normal crossings and `` pinch '' if it has also pinch points . * we always assume @xmath979 . indeed , the cover @xmath41 factors as @xmath980 . by lemma [ lem : inertia ] the map @xmath184 is tale near @xmath158 , while for every @xmath981 the fiber @xmath982 consists only of one point . since @xmath1 acts transitively on each fiber of @xmath41 , it is enough to describe the singularity of @xmath3 above any point @xmath983 . * the cover @xmath3 is normal at @xmath166 iff @xmath984=0 $ ] . it is nonsingular at @xmath166 iff either @xmath985 or @xmath986 , @xmath987 , @xmath988 . assume that @xmath3 is not normal , and let @xmath75 be an irreducible divisor that appears in @xmath32 with multiplicity 1 . this means that , say , @xmath989 and @xmath990 . the normalization of @xmath3 along @xmath75 is a @xmath1-cover of @xmath2 with branch data @xmath991 , for @xmath992 , and , if @xmath993 , @xmath994 ( cf . @xcite ) . * the cover @xmath3 is said to be _ simple _ if the @xmath995 is a basis of @xmath956 ( for instance , @xmath3 is simple if the @xmath996 are all equal ) . in this case @xmath3 is a complete intersection and it is very easy to write down equations for it ( see case @xmath997 below ) . * the double curve @xmath973 maps onto the divisors that appear in @xmath32 with multiplicity @xmath214 . since for a semismooth surface the double curve is locally irreducible , @xmath3 is never semismooth in the cases @xmath998 . in addition , if @xmath3 is semismooth then the pull back @xmath971 of @xmath973 to the normalization is smooth . using this remark , it is easy to check that @xmath3 is never semismooth in the cases @xmath999 , either . * in order to compute the minimal semiresolution @xmath978 , we consider the blow up @xmath1000 of @xmath2 at @xmath158 , pull back @xmath3 and normalize along the exceptional curve @xmath537 to get a cover @xmath1001 . the branch locus of @xmath1002 is supported on a d.c . divisor and , by construction , the singularities of @xmath1003 are only of type @xmath46 , @xmath776 or @xmath1004 . looking at the tables , one sees that either @xmath1003 is semismooth or it has points of type @xmath1005 or @xmath1006 ( cf . table [ tab : reduced - lines ] ) . in the former case @xmath1003 is the minimal semiresolution . in the latter case , blowing up @xmath1007 at the non semismooth points and taking base change and normalization along the exceptional divisor , one gets a semismooth cover @xmath1008 . the semiresolution @xmath1009 is minimal , except in cases @xmath1010 , @xmath1011 . in these cases the minimal semiresolution @xmath978 is obtained by contracting the inverse image in @xmath1012 of the exceptional curve of the blow up @xmath1000 . by remark ( 2 ) above , the normalization @xmath972 is an @xmath231-cover with branch data @xmath1013 , @xmath1014 and @xmath1015 . so @xmath1016 acts on @xmath3 without fixed points and @xmath3 is the disjoint union of two copies of the cover @xmath1017 . we choose local parameters @xmath1018 on @xmath2 such that @xmath950 is given by @xmath1019 , @xmath1020 is defined by @xmath1021 and @xmath1022 by @xmath1023 . the cover @xmath3 is defined tale locally above @xmath158 by the following equations : @xmath1024 in particular @xmath3 is a complete intersection ( see remark ( 3 ) above ) . the element @xmath996 acts on @xmath1025 as multiplication by @xmath1026 . the double curve @xmath973 is the inverse image of @xmath1019 , hence it is defined by @xmath1027 and the map @xmath1028 is given by @xmath1029 , so @xmath973 is isomorphic to @xmath1030 , with each component mapping @xmath776-to-@xmath46 to @xmath1031 . the curve @xmath971 is the inverse image of @xmath1032 in @xmath972 , so it has two connected components , each isomorphic to @xmath1030 , that are glued together in the map @xmath1033 . to compute the minimal semiresolution , consider the blow up @xmath1000 of @xmath2 at @xmath158 and the cover @xmath1002 obtained by pulling back @xmath1034 and normalizing along the exceptional curve @xmath537 . the branch data for @xmath1003 are @xmath1035 and , for @xmath1036 , @xmath1037 , where @xmath1038 indicates the strict transform . the cover is singular precisely above @xmath1039 and it is easy , using the local equations , to check that it is d.c . there . so @xmath1003 is the minimal semiresolution of @xmath3 . the exceptional divisor is the inverse image @xmath75 of @xmath537 in @xmath3 . applying the normalization algorithm to the restricted cover @xmath1040 , one sees that the normalization @xmath1041 of @xmath75 is the union of two smooth rational curves @xmath1042 and @xmath1043 . the map @xmath1044 identifies the two points of @xmath1042 that lie over the point @xmath1045 with the corresponding two points of @xmath1043 . hence @xmath1003 is the minimal semiresolution of @xmath3 and the singularity is a degenerate cusp solved by a cycle of two rational curves . as in the previous case , @xmath972 and @xmath971 can be computed by the normalization algorithm . one obtains that @xmath972 is the disjoint union of two copies of @xmath1046 and @xmath971 is the disjoint union of two copies of @xmath975 . this singularity is the quotient of a cover @xmath56 of type @xmath1047 by the element @xmath1048 . since this element has odd length , the index @xmath334 of @xmath3 at @xmath166 is equal to 2 . since the only fixed point of @xmath1049 on @xmath3 is @xmath1050 , the double curve @xmath973 is the quotient of the double curve @xmath1051 of @xmath56 . the two components of @xmath1051 are identified by @xmath1049 , thus @xmath973 is irreducible and maps @xmath776-to-@xmath46 onto @xmath1032 . to compute the minimal semiresolution , again we blow up @xmath1000 at @xmath158 and consider the cover @xmath1002 obtained by pull back and normalization along the exceptional curve @xmath537 . as usual , we denote by @xmath1052 the strict transform on @xmath1007 of a curve @xmath75 of @xmath2 . the branch data for @xmath1003 are @xmath1053 , @xmath1054 , @xmath1055 , @xmath1056 , and @xmath1057 . so @xmath1003 has normal crossings over @xmath1058 , it has four @xmath948 points over the point @xmath1059 and it is smooth elsewhere ( cf . tables 1 and 2 ) . we blow up at @xmath1060 and take again pull back and normalization along the exceptional curve @xmath1061 . we obtain a cover @xmath1062 which is d.c . over the strict transform @xmath1063 of @xmath1064 and has no other singularity , so @xmath1065 is a semismooth resolution . let @xmath1066 denote the strict transform on @xmath1067 of the exceptional curve @xmath537 of the first blow up . arguing as in case @xmath997 , one sees that inverse image of @xmath1066 is the union of two smooth rational curves @xmath1068 and @xmath1069 that intersect transversely precisely at one point of the double curve , and the inverse image of @xmath1061 consists of 4 disjoint curves @xmath1070 . all these curves pull back to -2 curves on the normalization of @xmath1012 and , up to relabeling , @xmath1071 and @xmath1072 form two disjoint @xmath1073 configurations . so @xmath1074 is the minimal semiresolution of @xmath3 . in the notation of @xcite[def . 4.26 ] , @xmath1012 is obtained by gluing two copies of @xmath1075 along @xmath975 . here we repeat the local analysis of the previous section for the case in which @xmath433 is d.c . , keeping as far as possible the same notations . so we fix @xmath446 , where @xmath21 is the double curve of @xmath2 , and describe @xmath3 locally over @xmath158 . we assume that @xmath0 is obtained by gluing standard covers @xmath435 , @xmath182 , such that @xmath158 lies on all the components of the hurwitz divisor @xmath32 . we let @xmath1076 be the union of the branch data of @xmath184 and @xmath185 such that @xmath85 is distinct from the double curve @xmath21 of @xmath2 ( hence @xmath1077 ) . we denote by @xmath1049 the generator of the inertia subgroup of @xmath21 for @xmath184 and @xmath185 . by remark [ rem : inertia ] the inertia subgroup @xmath157 is equal to @xmath1078 , so up to an tale cover we may assume that @xmath979 and that @xmath634 . since @xmath32 is @xmath204-cartier , there are the same number of @xmath85 on @xmath853 and on @xmath854 . we order them so that all components on @xmath853 come first . recall that @xmath931 by the assumption that @xmath566 is slc . the cases in the tables are labeled @xmath537 ( `` tale '' ) if @xmath1079 and @xmath80 ( `` ramified '' ) if @xmath1080 . the first digit of the label is the number @xmath154 of branch lines through @xmath158 . it is followed by @xmath951 if @xmath950 and by @xmath952 if @xmath950 and @xmath953 . for instance , in the cases e@xmath1081 the map @xmath41 is generically tale over @xmath21 and there are four branch lines @xmath1082 with @xmath950 , and @xmath1083 . the singularities that we get here are non - normal , and as in ( * ? ? ? 4.21 , 4.23 ) they turn out to be either semismooth or degenerate cusps in the gorenstein case and @xmath401-quotients of these otherwise . the tables here contain the same columns as those of [ subsec : sings - smooth - base ] plus an extra one , denoted @xmath12 : this is the contribution of @xmath158 in the formula for @xmath1084 of corollary [ cor : chi ] ( recall @xmath1085 ) . by propositions [ prop : index - non - normal ] and [ prop : index - graph ] the index @xmath334 is equal to 1 if all relations have even length when reduced modulo @xmath1049 and it is equal to 2 otherwise . the analysis of the singularities in the reducible case is similar to the case @xmath2 smooth . one blows up @xmath2 at the point @xmath158 and takes pull back and normalization of @xmath3 along the exceptional divisor . repeating this process , if necessary , one obtains a semiresolution @xmath1086 . if @xmath56 is not minimal , then the minimal semiresolution @xmath1087 is obtained by blowing down the @xmath1088-curves of @xmath56 . the normalization @xmath1089 is equal to @xmath1090 , where @xmath1091 is the normalization of @xmath679 . the branch data of @xmath1092 are @xmath1093 , @xmath1094 , so @xmath1095 is tale locally the disjoint union of four copies of the cover @xmath1096 . @xmath1097 is tale locally the disjoint union of two copies @xmath1017 . the image @xmath974 of the double curve @xmath973 is equal to @xmath1098 . the preimage in @xmath1095 of @xmath974 is the disjoint union of four copies of @xmath1030 . the preimage of @xmath974 in @xmath1099 is equal to two copies of @xmath1030 . hence @xmath1100 . each component of @xmath1101 maps 2-to-1 onto its image . the map @xmath1102 identifies in pairs the four components of the preimage of @xmath1032 and the eight components of the preimage of @xmath21 . so @xmath973 is @xmath1103 , with two components mapping 2-to-1 onto @xmath1032 and four components mapping 2-to-1 onto @xmath21 . to compute the semiresolution , blow up @xmath42 to get @xmath1000 let @xmath1104 and @xmath1105 be the irreducible components of the exceptional divisor . let @xmath1106 be the @xmath1-cover obtained from @xmath0 by taking pull back and normalizing along @xmath1066 and @xmath1061 . denoting by @xmath1038 the strict transform on @xmath1007 , the branch data of @xmath1107 are : @xmath1108 , @xmath1109 , @xmath1053 , @xmath1110 , @xmath1111 , @xmath1112 , @xmath1113 . so @xmath1003 is d.c . by the tables of [ subsec : sings - smooth - base ] and it is therefore the semiresolution @xmath978 of @xmath3 . the preimage of @xmath1066 is the union of four smooth rational curves meeting in pairs over the point @xmath1114 . the preimage of @xmath1061 is the disjoint union of two rational curves , which together with the components of the preimage of @xmath1066 form a cycle of six rational curves . the singularity @xmath160 is gorenstein by proposition [ prop : index - graph ] hence it is `` deg.cusp@xmath1115 '' . this is a @xmath401-quotient of r@xmath1116 and it is not gorenstein by proposition [ prop : index - non - normal ] . the normalization @xmath1089 is equal to @xmath1090 , where @xmath1117 is the normalization of @xmath1118 . the branch data of @xmath1119 are @xmath1120 , @xmath1094 , so @xmath1095 is tale locally the disjoint union of two copies of the cover @xmath1096 . the image @xmath974 of the double curve @xmath973 is equal to @xmath1098 . the preimage in @xmath1121 of @xmath974 is the disjoint union of two copies of @xmath1030 . the preimage of @xmath974 in @xmath1099 is @xmath1030 . hence @xmath1122 . each component of @xmath1101 maps 2-to-1 onto its image in @xmath974 . the map @xmath1102 identifies glues two itself each of the two components of the preimage of @xmath1032 and it identifies in pairs the four components of the preimage of @xmath21 . so @xmath973 is @xmath1123 , with two components mapping 1-to-1 onto @xmath1032 and two components mapping 2-to-1 onto @xmath21 . to compute the semiresolution , blow up @xmath42 to get @xmath1000 let @xmath1104 and @xmath1105 be the irreducible components of the exceptional divisor . let @xmath1106 be the @xmath1-cover obtained from @xmath0 by taking pull back and normalizing along @xmath1066 and @xmath1061 . denoting by @xmath1038 the strict transform on @xmath1007 , the branch data of @xmath1107 are : @xmath1124 , @xmath1125 , @xmath1126 , @xmath1110 , @xmath1111 , @xmath1112 , @xmath1127 . by the tables of [ subsec : sings - smooth - base ] , @xmath1003 has two pinch points over the point @xmath1128 and is at most d.c . elsewhere , hence it is equal to the minimal semiresolution @xmath1129 . the preimage of @xmath1066 is a pair of smooth rational curves meeting over the point @xmath1130 . the preimage of @xmath1061 is a smooth rational curve , meeting each component of the preimage of @xmath1066 at a point lying over @xmath1131 . in the notation of @xcite[def . 4.26 ] , @xmath978 is a chain consisting of copy of @xmath1132 ( namely the second component of @xmath978 ) in the middle and two copies of @xmath1133 with @xmath975 pinched at the ends . barbara fantechi and rita pardini , _ automorphisms and moduli spaces of varieties with ample canonical class via deformations of abelian covers _ , comm . algebra * 25 * ( 1997 ) , no . 5 , 14131441 . mr 1444010 ( 98c:14028 ) miles reid , _ canonical @xmath1134-folds _ , journes de gometrie algbrique dangers , juillet 1979/algebraic geometry , angers , 1979 , sijthoff & noordhoff , alphen aan den rijn , 1980 , pp . 273310 . mr 605348 ( 82i:14025 ) Abstract:
[ "an abelian cover is a finite morphism @xmath0 of varieties which is the quotient map for a generically faithful action of a finite abelian group @xmath1 . abelian covers with @xmath2 smooth and @xmath3 normal were studied in @xcite . here we study the non - normal case , assuming that @xmath3 and @xmath2 are @xmath4 varieties that have at worst normal crossings outside a subset of codimension @xmath5 . special attention is paid to the case of @xmath6-covers of surfaces , which is used in @xcite to construct explicitly compactifications of some components of the moduli space of surfaces of general type ." ]
16,330
16,330
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: stars form in dense and cool molecular clouds . when the local density is high enough , the matter can gravitationally collapse and form a young stellar object ( yso ) . in the early phases , the thick envelope dominates the emission from the yso and hides what is going on within ( class i ) . eventually , the envelope flattens out to a circumstellar accretion disk . this disk still causes an infrared ( ir ) excess above the level of a stellar photosphere ( class ii or classical t tauri star - ctts ) , which can be used to distinguish those objects from main - sequence stars , for example using the _ spitzer _ space telescope @xcite infrared array camera ( irac , * ? ? ? * ) . when the disk is cleared , the ir colors of the yso match those of main - sequence stars ( class iii or weak - lined t tauri star - wtts ) . in addition to the circumstellar absorption , many ysos are embedded in the molecular cloud , so that even class iii objects can appear reddened . the accretion disk does not reach down to the central star . instead , the inner edge of the gas disk is truncated by the stellar magnetic field . the inner radius of the optically thick dust in the disk is larger than the inner radius of the gas disk and mostly given by the dust - sublimation temperature . some of the mass in the circumstellar disk condenses into planets , some is blown out by accretion - driven disk and stellar winds , and is accreted onto the central star . this accretion can happen via magnetically confined accretion funnels ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) or via some magneto - hydrodynamical instability ( e.g. , * ? ? ? t tauri stars ( tts ) were originally identified by their variability @xcite long before anybody realized that tts are indeed pre - main sequence stars . the dominant timescale in the optical is the stellar rotation period , typically a few days to a week or more . ysos can have cool spots caused by magnetic activity similar to our sun and also hot spots which mark the impact points of the accretion funnels onto the stellar surface ( see , e.g. , review by * ? ? ? this impact happens at free - fall velocities up to 500 km s@xmath1 ; thus , the accretion shock heats the accreted mass to x - ray emitting temperatures . in the optical , the accretion region appears as emission that often is approximated as a blackbody with temperature @xmath2 k ( @xcite , but see also @xcite who argue that line emission contributes to the veiling in addition to a continuum ) . variability in the mass accretion rate can lead to changes in the hot spot signatures . the dynamical timescale that controls the accretion is the keplerian period of the inner disk where the accretion funnels start . the inner disk radius is found close to the co - rotation radius leading to a typical timescale of a few hours for typical masses and rotation periods of ysos . indeed optical variability with amplitudes around 0.1 mag is often observed in ctts on this timescale @xcite . another source of variability related to the accretion could be oscillations of the accretion shock on timescales of seconds . this has been predicted theoretically ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , but is not observed so far , possibly because the accretion spot separates into many small funnels that oscillate independently at different phases and frequencies . however , @xcite find indications that strong accretion in v1647 ori could excite radial pulsations of the star itself . one of the largest classes of short timescale ( @xmath3 days ) optical and ir variability in ysos is that due to variable extinction events @xcite . these come in three categories - aa tau - type variables ( stars with broad , periodic flux dips , whose amplitudes can be up to a magnitude or more in the optical ) , presumably due to our line of sight passing through a warp in the inner circumstellar disk ; stars with similar or narrower flux dips that have no obvious periodicity - presumably due to stars where our line of sight passes close to the disk and where disk instabilities can levitate dust high enough above the plane to intersect our line of sight briefly ; and stars with narrow , periodic flux dips - perhaps where our line of sight is being intersected by dust entrained in material accreting onto the star in a funnel flow . about 20% of the ysos in ngc 2264 fall into one of these categories in the sample of @xcite . ysos can also vary on much longer timescales . variability on the timescales of years could be caused by changing circumstellar extinction for a keplarian disk around a solar - mass yso this timescale translates to a radius of a few au ) or by massive accretion events when a significant fraction of the disk mass drains onto the yso @xcite . in this case the accretion luminosity can outshine the yso by orders of magnitudes and it takes months to years ( in the case of exor outbursts , * ? ? ? * ) or even centuries until the accretion decays back down to the original level . in any lightcurve , several of the processes dicussed above can contibute to the observed variability at the same time and it depends on the properties of each object which one dominates and if secondary effects can be detected in the lightcurve . for example , cool spots , hot spots , absorption , and massive accretion events can all influence the same optical light curve . another case are x - rays , where the flux and the spectrum can change due to periodic absorption , variability in the accretion rate ( tw hya , * ? ? ? * ) or coronal activity similar to what is seen on the sun . in most ysos , the last point is dominant and x - ray lightcurves often show the fast rise in flux and temperature and a slower decay characteristic of coronal activity ( see , e.g. , the _ chandra _ monitoring of the orion nebular cluster , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . the spectral energy distribution ( sed ) of ysos in the optical is dominated by the stellar photosphere and the accretion spot . thus , optical monitoring is very effective for understanding the stellar rotation and the accreting spot . however , the disk radiates mostly at longer wavelengths , which are probed in the ir observations presented in this article . depending on the mass of the disk and the size of the inner hole , the disk will start to dominate the sed at the @xmath4 band or in the irac bands at @xmath5 m and @xmath6 m . simple disk models still treat the disk as a static and axisymmetric structure , but observationally it now seems that the disk is in fact `` a bubbling , boiling , wrinkled , dented , warped mass of gas and dust '' @xcite , see also @xcite . this paper is part of the ysovar ( young stellar object variability ) project , which has monitored the ( onc ) and eleven smaller star forming regions with irac in @xmath5 m and @xmath6 m to understand the mid - ir variability of ysos . first results on the onc are published in @xcite . more details of the observing strategy and an overview of the data can be found in @xcite ( from now on `` paper i '' ) . comparing data from all clusters , paper i defines certain cut - off values for the data reduction , e.g. how much variability in a lightcurve is required to reliably identify an object as variable . in the analysis , paper i concentrates on variability in the ir on timescales of years . in this article , we present a _ spitzer_/irac monitoring campaign of the star forming region l1688 in the mid - ir to characterize the variability timescales and amplitudes as well as the color changes in the mid - ir in much more detail for the objects in l1688 than paper i on timescales up to two years . the structure of this paper is as follows : first , we introduce l1688 , the star forming region targeted by these observations ( section [ sect : thestarformingregionl1688 ] ) . in section [ sect : observationsdatareductionandauxiliarydata ] we introduce the data reduction and discuss source lists and stellar properties obtained from the literature . section [ sect : midirvariability ] classifies all sources according to their variability . section [ sect : resultsanddiscussion ] presents our results and discusses physical models to explain the observed features in the lightcurves . we end with a summary and some conclusions in section [ sect : summary ] . lynds 1688 ( l1688 ) is a sub - cloud of the @xmath7 ophiuchus star forming region , one of the best - studied young clusters in the sky ( see e.g. review by * ? ? ? the central region of l1688 is very dense and deeply embedded ( @xmath8 mag , see figure [ fig : map ] ) . thus , all surveys of the regions necessarily miss some cluster members . an extinction limited , spectroscopic survey @xcite finds an average age of 3.1 myr for a 6.8 pc@xmath9 region centered on l1688 and no significant deviation from the initial mass function . earlier studies concentrated on the deeper embedded core and found a much younger age of 0.3 myr . some , but not all , of this difference is due to the specific reddening laws or pre - main sequence evolutionary tracks used in these studies ( see discussion in * ? ? ? @xcite present photometric and spectroscopic monitoring for five ysos in l1688 nearly simultaneous with the _ spitzer _ observations discussed here . they do not see any correlation between the hydrogen emission lines that are usually considered accretion indicators and the features in the ir lightcurves of their targets , indicating that the relatively modest variability they observed is not caused by changes in the accretion rate . additional notable objects with well - sampled nir lightcurves are @xcite and , which show eclipses with periods of 131 and 93 days , respectively . these sources can be interpreted as multiple systems , where one or more components are eclipsed by a warped circumstellar disk . thus far , the most comprehensive study of near - ir variability of ysos in l1688 is @xcite ( see references therein for other ir variability studies ) , who make use of a two micron all sky survey ( 2mass * ? ? ? * ) calibration field that overlaps l1688 so each source has up to 1584 datapoints in @xmath10 , @xmath11 , and @xmath4 spanning 2.5 years . they find 79% of the known ysos to be variable . in total , 32 sources are periodic ( including cool starspots , hot accretion spots and 6 systems with eclipses ) , 31 sources show a long - term trend and 40 sources vary aperiodically on shorter timescales . the new data presented in this article complements the @xcite study with observations at longer wavelengths . in this section we briefly describe the data reduction for the _ spitzer _ and _ chandra _ observations . a detailed account of the observations , data processing and the source extraction is given in paper i. we also give an overview of auxiliary data on the stellar properties retrieved from the literature , which we need to test if the variability characteristics depend on the central star . we then assess the cluster membership and sed class for every source with a usable lightcurve . ccc 29267200 & 2010 - 04 - 12 11:00:41 & 2010 - 04 - 12 11:18:44 + 29266688 & 2010 - 04 - 12 17:02:37 & 2010 - 04 - 12 17:28:01 + 29266176 & 2010 - 04 - 12 22:48:49 & 2010 - 04 - 12 23:09:28 + 29265664 & 2010 - 04 - 13 08:44:31 & 2010 - 04 - 13 09:05:35 + 29265408 & 2010 - 04 - 13 20:09:17 & 2010 - 04 - 13 20:26:33 + three fields in l1688 were observed with _ spitzer _ in four observing windows from 2010 - 04 - 12 to 2010 - 05 - 16 ( visibility window 1 ) , 2010 - 09 - 22 to 2010 - 10 - 27 ( visibility window 2 ) , 2011 - 04 - 20 to 2011 - 05 - 23 ( visibility window 3 ) , and 2011 - 10 - 01 to 2011 - 11 - 06 ( visibility window 4 ) . these windows are consecutive visibility periods dictated by the _ spitzer _ orbit @xcite . they are shown visually in figure [ fig : cadence ] . in the first visibility window , the sampling is much denser in time than in the later visibility windows . for most sources , about 70 observations with irregular time intervals to aid period detection were obtained in visibility window 1 . in the first visibility window , we use a repeating pattern of 8 observations every 3.5 days . within the 3.5 day period the time - step increases from 2 to 16 hours . in the last three visibility windows , the time steps increase linearly with step lengths of roughly 1 , 2 , 3 , ... days to again sample multiple variability frequencies equally . this irregular sampling minimizes aliasing with the observation frequency . less than ten datapoints per source are taken in each of the later three visibility windows . in total , there are 108 observations with a total mapping time of 30.7 hours . table [ tab : aor ] lists the time of each observation . they can be found under program identification number ( pid ) 61024 in the spitzer heritage archive . each observation consists of six dithers in irac mapping mode using the high - dynamic - range ( hdr ) data acquisition mode which obtains a 0.4 s and a 10.4 s exposure for each pointing . the three fields chosen were observed with the irac 1 and irac 2 channels ( effective wavelengths 3.6@xmath12 m and 4.5@xmath12 m ) . both channels operate simultaneously , but their fields - of - view are non - overlapping . thus , each target field is observed in two consecutive pointings , one for each channel . a secondary field is observed in the secondary channel while the primary channel is observing the target field . in visibility windows 1 and 3 , sources south of the main fields have only irac 1 data , while those to the north only have irac 2 data . in visibility windows 2 and 4 , the situation is reversed . not all sources in the central fields have usable data in both bands , because they might be too bright or too faint in one channel , or fall on the edge of the map . additional sources with two band coverage are found where the northern side field of one target field overlaps with the southern side field of another target field . here we summarize the main data reduction and processing steps described in detail in paper i. basic calibrated data ( bcd ) are obtained from the _ spitzer _ archive . further data reduction is performed with the idl package cluster grinder @xcite , that treats each bcd image for bright source artifacts . aperture photometry is performed on individual bcds with an aperture radius of @xmath13 . to increase the signal - to - noise ratio and to reject cosmic rays , the photometry from all bcds in each observation is combined . the reported value is the average brightness of all bcds within that observation that contain the source in question , after rejecting outliers . the photometric uncertainties obtained from the aperture photometry are , particularly for faint sources , only lower limits to the total uncertainty , since distributed nebulosity often found in star forming regions can contribute to the noise . to improve these estimates , paper i introduces an error floor value that is added in quadrature to the uncertainties of individual photometric points . the value of the error floor is 0.01 mag for irac 1 and 0.007 mag for irac 2 . we cross - match sources from individual observations with a matching radius of @xmath14 with each other and with the 2mass catalog , which is used as a coordinate reference . all photometric measurements performed in the context of the ysovar project are collected in a central database , which we intend to deliver to the infrared science archive ( irsa ) for general distribution . data for this article were retrieved from the ysovar database on 2013 - 10 - 31 and further processed using custom routines in python available at https://github.com/ysovar . we visually checked all frames for lightcurves that are classified as variable in section [ sect : midirvariability ] and removed datapoints visibly affected by instrumental artifacts ( cosmic rays , read - out streaks for bright neighbors ) . figure [ fig : map ] shows the distribution of the sources with lightcurves in our input catalog overlayed on a larger irac 1 map observed during the cryogenic mission . in this article , we consider only objects that have at least five datapoints in our irac 1 or irac 2 lightcurves . a stricter definition is employed in paper i , where only sources with more than five datapoints _ in the fast - cadence data ( first visibility window ) _ are used . in l1688 , 822 of the total list of 882 sources fullfill this stricter condition . in table [ tab : tab2 ] they are marked in the column ` standardset ` . despite the careful data reduction described above , some residual artifacts remain in the _ spitzer _ lightcurves . in this section , we search for artifacts that are related to the position on the detector . compared with other clusters in the ysovar project , l1688 is particularly suited to discover these kinds of effects because the fields observed in l1688 have almost no rotation within one visibility window . the spacecraft orientation flips between visibility windows , so that most instrumental artifacts produce lightcurves that have one level in visibility window 1 and 3 and another level in visibility window 2 and 4 . figure [ fig : instrumentallcs ] shows sources with a magnitude between 8 and 15 in @xmath6 m , that might fall in this category . the relative difference in magnitude is smaller for brighter sources , but since the photometric errors are also smaller these instrumental effects can still be significant . we visually inspected every frame for a sample of sources with lightcurves similar to those in figure [ fig : instrumentallcs ] to identify the cause for the artifacts . we found that several different effects can cause these steps in the lightcurve . some sources are close to a detector edge , such that the background is not well - determined , some are in the wings of the point - spread function ( psf ) of a bright neighbor , and some show residuals from hot pixels . proximity to a detector edge or hot pixel affects only one of the spacecraft orientations ; even the psf wings change with the orientation since the psf is not circular . sufficiently strong intrinsic variability can mask this offset between visibility windows and for any individual source , this instrumental effect can not be distinguished from intrinsic variability with a period of one year . thus , we use a statistical approach to quantify the number of lightcurves that suffer from this problem . for each channel , we have about 200 lightcurves with datapoints in all four observing visibility windows ( the total number of lightcurves is larger , but only for sources in the three target fields do we have data for all four visibility windows ) . if the mean magnitude in a visibility window depends on the detector position of the source , this source will on average be brighter in visibility window 1 and 3 and fainter in visibility window 2 and 4 ( or vice - versa ) . we calculate the mean magnitude in each visibility window and test whether the two brightest mean magnitudes belong to visibility window [ 1,3 ] or [ 2,4 ] or any other combination ( [ 1,2 ] , [ 1,4 ] , [ 2,3 ] , [ 3,4 ] ) . we use the following abbreviated notation : when we calculate the mean magnitudes in each visibility window for a sample of @xmath15 sources , then @xmath16:@xmath17:@xmath18 means that @xmath16 sources have the brightest mean magnitudes in visibility windows [ 1,3 ] , @xmath17 sources in visibility windows [ 2,4 ] and @xmath18 sources have their two brightest mean magnitudes in any other combination of visibility windows . if the difference in the mean magnitude between visibility windows is unrelated to the position on the detector , we expect the ratio @xmath1917%:17%:67% . in contrast , the observed lightcurves have the ratio 47:66:75=25%:35%:40% for irac 1 and 52:59:95=25%:29%:46% for irac 2 . this is incompatible with the expected multinomial distribution ( the probability to observe a distribution at least as far from the expected @xmath20 by chance is @xmath21 ) . in each case , about 50 lightcurves , a quarter of the sample , need to be shifted from the first two bins to the last bin to make the observed distribution compatible with the expected distribution . this implies that about a quarter of all lightcurves suffer from the artifacts described above . however , both irac channels use independent detectors and thus the chance that both channels are affected for the same source and that the effect goes the same way ( bright - faint , vs. faint - bright ) is low . below in section [ sect : midirvariability ] we identify variable sources using a stetson and a @xmath22 test . the limits in those tests are designed to be conservative and indeed we find a distribution of 5:7:24=14%:19%:67% for irac 1 and 5:5:27=14%:14%:73% for irac 2 , when we restrict the sample to those lightcurves that will be classified as variable below . both ratios are fully compatible with the expected multinomial distribution @xmath20 . this shows that the limits we apply are conservative enough that the sample of stars we identify as variable has no or only few sources where the variability is not due to intrinsic source variability . therefore it is not necessary to remove any source based on magnitude jumps between visibility windows . only one of the four lightcurves shown in figure [ fig : instrumentallcs ] ( sstysv j162727.53 - 242611.2 ) will be identified as variable below . we visually inspected all lightcurves that are marked as variable and , apart form the example shown above , we did not see lightcurves where the variability seems to be due to the pattern discussed in this section . in summary , about a quarter of all lightcurves are affected by detector position dependent artifacts . in extreme cases , the associated jumps reach 0.5 mag for a 14 mag source , and up to 0.05 mag in bright sources around 8 mag . however , we show statistically that the definition of variability we use is so conservative that this effect does not contribute a significant number of objects to our sample of variable sources . disk - bearing ysos can be identified from _ spitzer _ data alone , but information in other spectral bands is required to find the other cluster members . x - ray observations are one way to identify diskless ( class iii ) ysos . in the ir the seds of those sources are indistinguishable from a main - sequence field star , but due to their rapid rotation , ysos are much brighter in x - rays than field stars . l1688 was observed by _ chandra _ on 2000 - 04 - 13 for 100 ks exposure time in the ` faint ` mode with the acis instrument ( ) . we reprocessed this exposure with the anchors pipeline @xcite using a recent calibration ; see discussion in paper i. these data has been analyzed in detail to study the distribution of x - ray properties in ctts and to identify brown dwarfs in this star forming region @xcite . during the observation , five acis chips were operational , four from the central acis - i imaging array , as well as one acis - s chip . the point - spread - function ( psf ) degrades significantly for sources located off - axis , and thus the coordinates of the outer sources are less reliable . to cross - match x - ray sources with _ sources we used a matching radius of 1 for x - ray sources within 3 of the optical axis of _ chandra _ , 1.5 for sources between 3 and 6 away from the optical axis and 2 for all sources located further than 6 from the optical axis . the observed _ chandra _ field overlaps about two thirds of the area covered in the _ spitzer _ monitoring . however , the variable psf leads to a sensitivity that varies over the observed field , thus the absence of an x - ray detection for _ spitzer _ sources does not necessarily imply the absence of x - ray emission . the acis detector has an intrinsic energy resolution , and we use the net flux to characterize the x - ray properties . for sources with more than 20 counts , we also fit an absorbed single - temperature apec model @xcite with abundances fixed at 0.3 times the solar value from @xcite . sources are extracted down to a very low significance . in total , there are 315 detected x - ray sources , but only 31 of them match an object with a _ spitzer _ we disregard all unmatched sources ; for sources with a lightcurve and an x - ray counterpart , the x - ray properties are given in table [ tab : tab2 ] . to estimate the number of spurious matches , we multiply the fraction of the total survey area that is included in the positional error circles of the x - ray sources with the number of _ spitzer _ sources with lightcurves . the result is the average number of spurious matches . we expect at most 2 - 4 _ spitzer _ sources to be matched to a spurious x - ray source . x - ray sources that are cross - matched successfully are marked in figure [ fig : map ] . the star forming region l1688 has been the target of intense study over the past decades and a wealth of additional information exists in the literature . in particular , we refer the reader to two reviews @xcite . the latter review compiles a list of objects with a high probability of membership from a variety of published sources . the membership criteria employed are ( i ) x - ray emission , which at the distance of l1688 is detectable only from young , and thus active stars ; ( ii ) optical spectroscopy , with h@xmath23 in emission or li in absorption ; ( iii ) a location above the main - sequence in the hr diagram ; or ( iv ) ir emission that is indicative of a circumstellar disk . l1688 was also observed with _ spitzer _ in the cryogenic mission phase with all four irac channels and the 24@xmath24 m channel of the multiband imaging photometer for spitzer ( mips , * ? ? ? objects classified as ysos from these data @xcite are already contained in the membership list of @xcite . we augment our own _ spitzer _ data reduction with values from the catalog published by the c2d project ( c2d = from cores to disks ; * ? ? ? if we did not obtain a photometric value for an irac band or the @xmath25 m mips , but a value with the quality specifier a , b or c is present in the c2d catalog then we use that value . the data are given in table [ tab : tab2 ] , which specifies if a datapoint is taken from our own data reduction ( g09 : using the pipeline from * ? ? ? * ) or the c2d database . near - ir data is taken from 2mass @xcite and cross - matched by the cluster grinder pipeline @xcite . additionally , we take detections from the ukirt infrared deep sky survey ( ukidss ) galactic cluster survey , data release 9 . the ukidss project is defined in @xcite . ukidss uses the united kingdom infrared telescope ( ukirt ) wide field camera and a photometric system described in @xcite . the pipeline processing and science archive are described in @xcite . we only retain detections with a ` mergedclass ` flag between -3 and 0 . sources brighter than @xmath26 mag can be saturated and we discard the ukidss data for any source that lies above this threshold either in ukidss or 2mass . this leaves us with 2mass data in the range @xmath27 mag and ukidss @xmath28 mag . the luminosity function for both dataset is almost identical from @xmath26 to @xmath29 . for fainter sources , 2mass is incomplete ; ukidss is incomplete for @xmath30 mag . the ysovar data is also cross - matched with data from the simbad service to provide an identification with known objects from the literature . in all cases the matching radius is set to @xmath14 . if a catalog contains multiple entries within @xmath14 of a ysovar source , we match it to the closest catalog entry . in some cases the best cross - match is not obvious . those sources are discussed in appendix [ sect : remarksaboutcrossmatchingindividualsources ] . ukidss has a better spatial resolution than our irac data . there are nine sources where more than one ukidss source is found within the size of the aperture we use for irac photometry . in six cases ( wsb 52 , iso - oph 152 , iso - oph 131 , sstysv j162728.13 - 243719.6 , sstysv j162718.11 - 244814.1 , sstysv j162718.25 - 244955.8 ) the second source is visible in the @xmath31 band , the ukidss band that is closest in wavelength to the irac data , so it is likely that both sources contribute to the observed irac emission . in the remaining three cases ( iso - oph 28 , iso - oph 57 , sstysv j162741.14 - 242038.3 ) the second source is not visible at @xmath31 band . ccccc 1 & ra & deg & & j2000.0 right ascension + 2 & dec & deg & & j2000.0 declination + 3 & name & & & identifier for object + 4 & iau_name & & & j2000.0 iau designation within the ysovar program + 5 & other_names & & & alternative identifiers for object + 6 & c2d_id & & & + 7 & wil08_id & & & wilking et al . ( 2008 ) + 8 & adoc08_aoc & & & j2000.0 iau designation ( jhhmmss.ss+ddmmss.s ) + 9 & ukidss_sourceid & & & + 10 & jmag & mag & @xmath10 & + 11 & e_jmag & mag & @xmath10 & observational uncertainty + 12 & r_jmag & & @xmath10 & data source + 13 & hmag & mag & @xmath11 & + 14 & e_hmag & mag & @xmath11 & observational uncertainty + 15 & r_hmag & & @xmath11 & data source + 16 & kmag & mag & @xmath31 & + 17 & e_kmag & mag & @xmath31 & observational uncertainty + 18 & r_kmag & & @xmath31 & data source + 19 & 3.6mag & mag & @xmath32 m & + 20 & e_3.6mag & mag & @xmath32 m & observational uncertainty + 21 & r_3.6mag & & @xmath32 m & data source + 22 & 4.5mag & mag & @xmath33 m & + 23 & e_4.5mag & mag & @xmath33 m & observational uncertainty + 24 & r_4.5mag & & @xmath33 m & data source + 25 & 5.8mag & mag & @xmath34 m & + 26 & e_5.8mag & mag & @xmath34 m & observational uncertainty + 27 & r_5.8mag & & @xmath34 m & data source + 28 & 8.0mag & mag & @xmath35 m & + 29 & e_8.0mag & mag & @xmath35 m & observational uncertainty + 30 & r_8.0mag & & @xmath35 m & data source + 31 & 24mag & mag & @xmath36 m & + 32 & e_24mag & mag & @xmath36 m & observational uncertainty + 33 & r_24mag & & @xmath36 m & data source + 34 & sedclass & & & ir class according to sed slope + 35 & s1_sedclass & & & ir class according to sed slope ( visibility window 1 ) + 36 & member(ysovar ) & & & cluster membership according to ysovar standard + 37 & standardset & & & source in ysovar standard set ? + 38 & ns1_36 & ct & @xmath32 m & number of datapoints ( visibility window 1 ) + 39 & ns1_45 & ct & @xmath33 m & number of datapoints ( visibility window 1 ) + 40 & maxs1_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & maximum magnitude in lightcurve ( visibility window 1 ) + 41 & mins1_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & minimum magnitude in lightcurve ( visibility window 1 ) + 42 & maxs1_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & maximum magnitude in lightcurve ( visibility window 1 ) + 43 & mins1_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & minimum magnitude in lightcurve ( visibility window 1 ) + 44 & means1_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & mean magnitude ( visibility window 1 ) + 45 & stddevs1_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & standard deviation calculated from non - biased variance ( visibility window 1 ) + 46 & deltas1_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & width of distribution from 10% to 90% ( visibility window 1 ) + 47 & means1_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & mean magnitude ( visibility window 1 ) + 48 & stddevs1_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & standard deviation calculated from non - biased variance ( visibility window 1 ) + 49 & deltas1_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & width of distribution from 10% to 90% ( visibility window 1 ) + 50 & redchi2tomeans1_36 & & @xmath32 m & reduced @xmath22 to mean ( visibility window 1 ) + 51 & redchi2tomeans1_45 & & @xmath33 m & reduced @xmath22 to mean ( visibility window 1 ) + 52 & coherence_time_36 & d & @xmath32 m & decay time of acf ( visibility window 1 ) + 53 & coherence_time_45 & d & @xmath33 m & decay time of acf ( visibility window 1 ) + 54 & s1_stetson_36_45 & & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & stetson index for a two - band lightcurve . ( visibility window 1 ) + 55 & s1_cmd_alpha_36_45 & rad & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & angle of best - fit line in cmd ( visibility window 1 ) + 56 & s1_cmd_alpha_error_36_45 & rad & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & uncertainty on angle ( visibility window 1 ) + 57 & n_36 & ct & @xmath32 m & number of datapoints + 58 & n_45 & ct & @xmath33 m & number of datapoints + 59 & max_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & maximum magnitude in lightcurve + 60 & min_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & minimum magnitude in lightcurve + 61 & max_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & maximum magnitude in lightcurve + 62 & min_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & minimum magnitude in lightcurve + 63 & mean_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & mean magnitude + 64 & stddev_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & standard deviation calculated from non - biased variance + 65 & delta_36 & mag & @xmath32 m & width of distribution from 10% to 90% + 66 & mean_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & mean magnitude + 67 & stddev_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & standard deviation calculated from non - biased variance + 68 & delta_45 & mag & @xmath33 m & width of distribution from 10% to 90% + 69 & redchi2tomean_36 & & @xmath32 m & reduced @xmath22 to mean + 70 & redchi2tomean_45 & & @xmath33 m & reduced @xmath22 to mean + 71 & stetson_36_45 & & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & stetson index for a two - band lightcurve . + 72 & cmd_alpha_36_45 & rad & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & angle of best - fit line in cmd + 73 & cmd_alpha_error_36_45 & rad & @xmath32 m , @xmath33 m & uncertainty on angle + 74 & teff & k & & effective temperature from literature + 75 & r_teff & & & reference for teff + 76 & x - ray & & & chandra counterpart ? + table [ tab : tab2 ] contains the position , the designation , the flux densities of each source and properties of their lightcurves . the properties of the lightcurve will be discussed in detail in the remainder of this article . most properties of the lightcurve , e.g. mean , minimum and maximum , appear twice . they are calculated once over the entire available lightcurve and once for the first visibility window only ; the fast - cadence sampling is available uniformly for all clusters in the ysovar project and thus values calculated over the fast - cadence only can be compared between clusters ( see , e.g. paper i ) . a subset of the properties of lightcurves with a mean magnitude @xmath37 in irac 1 or irac 2 is shown in table [ tab : tab2small ] . cccccccc cfhtwir - oph 29 & f & yes & 0.57 & 0.55 & 368.58 & 18.61 & 3.20 + [ edj2009 ] 809 & ii & yes & 0.17 & 0.18 & 41.13 & & + wl 6 & i & yes & 0.58 & & 440.74 & & 4.70 + cfhtwir - oph 16 & ii & yes & 0.05 & 0.05 & 2.42 & & + iso - oph 138 & ii & yes & 0.11 & 0.12 & 15.90 & & 1.00 + iso - oph 53 & ii & yes & 0.06 & 0.08 & 5.56 & 1.72 & 1.10 + wsb 52 & ii & yes & 0.20 & 0.24 & 69.45 & 7.81 & 7.80 + wl 4 & ii & yes & 0.46 & 0.38 & 366.61 & 17.97 & 5.80 + iso - oph 137 & i & yes & 0.20 & 0.17 & 65.12 & 5.60 & 1.40 + wl 3 & i & yes & 0.23 & 0.25 & 61.16 & 8.67 & 8.50 + iso - oph 139 & f & yes & 0.12 & 0.14 & 17.48 & 4.10 & 1.60 + iso - oph 51 & f & no & 0.40 & 0.30 & 239.84 & & 4.20 + iso - oph 122 & f & yes & 0.19 & & 45.78 & & 1.10 + wsb 49 & ii & no & 0.23 & 0.18 & 84.90 & & + iso - oph 161 & i & yes & 0.34 & 0.34 & 241.40 & 13.16 & 5.40 + rox 25 & ii & yes & & 0.20 & & & + iso - oph 140 & ii & yes & 0.17 & 0.19 & 42.95 & 5.99 & 4.70 + iso - oph 120 & f & yes & 0.18 & 0.24 & 69.78 & 6.44 & 2.20 + sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 & i & no & 0.09 & 0.07 & 6.14 & 1.28 & 0.90 + iso - oph 152 & ii & yes & 0.08 & 0.07 & 5.45 & 0.73 & 1.00 + iso - oph 21 & i & yes & 0.52 & 0.35 & 329.65 & 13.48 & 7.70 + roxn 44 & ii & no & 0.06 & 0.05 & 5.13 & 1.86 & 3.20 + ylw 15 & i & yes & 0.13 & & 34.38 & & 7.20 + [ gy92 ] 30 & i & yes & 0.13 & 0.10 & 12.90 & 2.03 & 3.60 + sstysv j162721.82 - 241842.4 & ii & no & 0.03 & 0.06 & 0.76 & & 1.30 + wl 11 & ii & yes & 0.21 & 0.25 & 28.38 & & + ylw 47 & ii & yes & 0.16 & 0.13 & 49.72 & & 3.10 + iso - oph 35 & ii & yes & 0.06 & 0.06 & 3.68 & & + [ gy92 ] 264 & ii & yes & 0.20 & 0.26 & 62.16 & 7.17 & 2.10 + 2mass j16271881 - 2448523 & iii & no & 0.10 & 0.09 & 4.79 & & + iso - oph 153 & ii & no & 0.29 & 0.23 & 118.17 & 8.42 & 0.70 + sstysv j162622.19 - 242352.2 & iii & no & 0.02 & 0.02 & 0.68 & 0.32 & 0.70 + cfhtwir - oph 74 & ii & no & 0.21 & 0.38 & 3.56 & 1.08 & 5.00 + iso - oph 34 & f & yes & 0.05 & 0.05 & 2.26 & 1.03 & 0.50 + crbr 2322.3 - 1143 & ii & yes & 0.07 & 0.12 & 4.53 & & 2.00 + iso - oph 33 & f & yes & 0.10 & 0.12 & 6.25 & 1.90 & 4.70 + iso - oph 145 & f & yes & 0.36 & 0.41 & 216.30 & 13.03 & 1.80 + roxn 41 & ii & no & 0.05 & 0.03 & 3.02 & 1.04 & 1.30 + iso - oph 144 & f & yes & 0.13 & 0.08 & 21.70 & 3.32 & 1.50 + sstysv j162617.46 - 242314.3 & ii & no & 0.35 & 0.11 & 21.64 & 6.37 & + iso - oph 50 & i & yes & 0.99 & 1.90 & 821.89 & & 5.60 + [ gmm2009 ] oph l1688 30 & i & yes & 0.24 & 0.20 & 42.64 & 5.27 & 3.70 + iso - oph 165 & i & yes & 0.24 & 0.26 & 73.32 & 6.23 & 6.90 + [ edj2009 ] 892 & f & yes & 0.95 & 1.13 & 1084.07 & 33.56 & 7.60 + iso - oph 26 & f & yes & 0.11 & 0.12 & 16.35 & 2.65 & 3.00 + iso - oph 154 & ii & yes & 0.15 & 0.24 & 22.39 & 4.74 & 1.30 + cfhtwir - oph 21 & f & no & 0.06 & 0.05 & 5.10 & & 3.00 + iso - oph 124 & i & yes & 0.17 & 0.19 & 33.31 & 4.76 & 1.20 + wl 13 & ii & yes & 0.11 & & 14.34 & & 1.70 + rox 26 & i & yes & 0.29 & & 120.65 & & 8.40 + iso - oph 37 & i & yes & 0.46 & 0.36 & 228.62 & 11.54 & 6.40 + [ edj2009 ] 824 & f & yes & 0.08 & 0.07 & 5.94 & 2.19 & 3.70 + iso - oph 118 & f & yes & 0.27 & 0.29 & 52.56 & 7.06 & + sstysv j162727.53 - 242611.2 & i & no & 0.31 & 0.27 & 5.03 & 1.46 & 1.10 + iso - oph 52 & f & yes & 0.30 & 0.27 & 110.30 & 9.03 & 4.90 + sstysv j162621.66 - 241820.1 & f & no & 0.23 & 0.28 & 7.15 & & 0.70 + iso - oph 19 & ii & yes & 0.09 & 0.12 & 13.24 & 3.00 & + 2mass j16263046 - 2422571 & f & yes & 0.40 & 0.44 & 185.94 & 12.69 & 4.20 + sstysv j162728.30 - 244029.5 & i & no & 0.52 & 0.54 & 4.72 & 1.97 & 6.20 + we build two l1688 membership lists based on different criteria . the first is defined in paper i and is applied uniformly for all clusters in the ysovar project . sources are treated as cluster members if they fulfill at least one of the following criteria : ( i ) they are classified as ysos by @xcite based on their ir excess in cryogenic mission _ spitzer _ data or ( ii ) they are detected as x - ray sources in _ chandra _ imaging and have a spectral slope compatible with a stellar photosphere ( sed class iii , see section [ sect : spectralslope ] ) . at the distance of l1688 ( we use 120 pc from , but see also discussion in paper i ) , cluster members that are young and thus still magnetically active stars can be detected in x - rays . a total of 57 sources fulfill one or both conditions . in table [ tab : tab2 ] , these objects are marked as `` member ( ysovar ) '' . the main biases in this sample are that the ir criterion selects only those members with disks and not class iii sources , while the _ chandra _ criterion suffers from incomplete spatial coverage and it may include late - type foreground stars . the different biases are a common problem in multiwavelength studies of star forming regions ( see , e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the second membership list is taken from @xcite . on this list , 74 of our 884 sources with _ lightcurves are cluster members ; 51 of those 74 are also included in the ysovar membership list due to their x - ray or ir emission . when we compare properties of members and non - members below without referring to a specific set , then we mean membership as defined by the standard ysovar criteria . six sources in the ysovar standard member set are not part of the @xcite list . more details on those source are given in appendix [ sect : g09notwil ] . on the other hand , all of the sources in @xcite that are not part of the ysovar standard set were selected based on an x - ray detection from observations other than _ chandra _ ( for the specific references see * ? ? ? figure [ fig : hist36 ] shows a histogram of the observed mean magnitudes in @xmath32 m . almost all bright sources are cluster members . the fraction of members drops below 11th mag and no cluster member is found below 14th mag . we expect background sources to be fainter than cluster members because of their larger distance and because they are seen through the cloud , but also fainter sources can not be reliably classified . the thickness of the cloud is inhomogenous . the three primary fields cover roughly @xmath38 mag in the extinction maps from the c2d project @xcite . this correspondes to @xmath39}=1.3 - 2.2 $ ] mag @xcite . at the distance of l1688 , a k5 star with little or no extinction has @xmath40 } = 12.2 $ ] mag according to the evolutionary tracks of and the yso colors from @xcite . thus , even late - k or early - m star members in the cloud are bright enough to be detected . just over 10% of the 884 sources with lightcurves are classified by @xcite at all , because this classification scheme is conservative , representing a set of sources that can be dereddened and classified to a high degree of confidence . however , for many sources , we lack the required spectral coverage . of those sources that can be classified in this way , 16 are class i sources , 36 are class ii sources and 59 are class iii candidates , i.e. , sources with a weak or absent ir excess in their sed ( in this case the ir sed does not provide sufficient information to decide if a star is a yso or a field star ) . ten of those 59 have an x - ray counterpart in our _ chandra _ data . in order to classify all sources , including those not classified in @xcite , paper i defines a simpler approach , which uses the observed colors only . in this scheme , we fit the spectral slope @xmath41 , where @xmath42 is the wavelength and @xmath43 the flux density per unit wavelength interval at that wavelength . we make use of all measured flux densities ( no upper limits ) in the 2 - 24@xmath12 m range , which corresponds to the range from the @xmath4 or @xmath31 filter , which we take from 2mass and/or ukidss , respectively , to the mips 24@xmath12 m channel . we use the flux densities for all _ spitzer _ bands from the observations presented in @xcite ( and we include all sources extracted using this pipeline including those that are not published in @xcite because they are not classified as yso in that work ) or c2d and summarize the new lightcurves by calculating the mean and standard deviation for the new irac1 and irac2 data . thus , sources detected both in the cryogenic mission and in the new dataset will have two datapoints for irac1 and irac2 . if a source is detected in both 2mass and ukidss we use both values for the fit , since they are independent measurements . we perform a least - squares fit and call sources with @xmath44 class i , @xmath45 flat - spectrum ( f ) , @xmath46 class ii sources and @xmath47 class iii candidates . the classifications are given in table [ tab : tab2 ] in two columns . ` s1_sedclass ` presents the derived sed class using all available literature data as described above and the mean of the lightcurves from visibility window 1 for comparison with paper i ; ` sedclass ` uses the same literature data but the mean flux density for the lightcurves calculated for all visibility windows . in this scheme a significantly reddened main - sequence star , which has an intrinsic slope @xmath48 , may appear as class ii object , so this observational classification can not be translated directly into the evolutionary stage of an object . of the remaining sources we find 110 class i , 78 flat - spectrum and 455 class ii sources and 221 class iii candidates . we can not classify 20 sources , because they are seen in one band only . not only the evolutionary status but also other properties of the individual source such as inclination or stellar mass influence the value of @xmath23 . massive stars emit more energetic radiation and can thus change the structure of the accretion disk . however , l1688 is a region without massive ysos @xcite and we define @xmath23 using wavelengths longward of the @xmath31 band far from the peak of the stellar sed , so the shape of the photospheric sed has only negligible influence on the total sed . @xcite simulated different ysos of low mass . their results show that seds depend mostly on the evolutionary stage except for very extreme cases such as stars with an edge - on disk . thus , @xmath23 provides a good proxy for the evolutionary state of the ysos in l1688 . comparing with @xcite , the resulting classification is very similar , particularly for the class i and flat - spectrum sources . most sources with a spectral slope @xmath49 according to our slope - fitting are class i sources in both classification schemes . with two exceptions our flat - spectrum sources are either class i or ii in @xcite . of the 52 sources with a spectral slope between -1.6 and -0.3 , 21 are also called class ii by @xcite , but 30 are class iii in that paper , indicating that a significant fraction of what we call class ii might indeed be reddened background stars . the general agreement between the more complex classification scheme and the observed spectral slope is also found for other star forming regions ( paper i ) . we use three different methods to detect variability in all lightcurves , independent of their membership status or sed slope . sources are considered variable , if they fullfill at least one of the following conditions : ( i ) a two - band lightcurve exisits and their stetson index is larger than 0.9 ( sect . [ sect : stetsonindex ] ) ; ( ii ) only a one - band lightcurve exisits and @xmath50 ( sect . [ sect : chi2 ] ) ; ( iii ) the lightcurve is periodic ( sect . [ sect : periodicity ] ) . sources in the target fields are observed in irac 1 and irac 2 almost simultaneously ( within a few minutes ) . for those sources , we calculate the stetson index @xmath51 with points weighted evenly @xcite : @xmath52 where the sum is taken over all @xmath53 pairs of observations in irac1 and irac2 with observed magnitudes @xmath54 and @xmath55 and uncertainties @xmath56 and @xmath57 ; @xmath58 denotes the sign of @xmath59 . @xmath59 is the product of the normalized residuals in both bands : @xmath60 here @xmath61 denotes the error - weighted mean of all irac 1 magnitudes and @xmath62 the error - weighted mean of all irac 2 magnitudes . the stetson index is very robust to observational errors since those are unlikely to affect both bands in the same way . following paper i , we define a source as variable if @xmath63 . in paper i , this is calculated over the first visibility window only ; in this article we use the lightcurve from all four visibility windows . the stetson index calculated for the first visibility window only can be found in table [ tab : tab2 ] in column ` s1_stetson_36_45 ` and for the entire lightcurve in column ` stetson_36_45 ` . figure [ fig : stetsonlcs ] shows examples of lightcurves that are classified as variable according to the stetson index . in the first visibility window , we find 34 sources to be variable , that is 18% of all lightcurves where we can calculate the stetson index . the number is similar ( 38 sources , 18% ) if we consider all observing visibility windows . this is not surprising , given that the stetson index is designed to be a `` robust '' statistic that is little influenced by a small number of datapoints , and compared to the first visibility window , the other visibility windows only contribute a small number of datapoints . we caution that equation [ eqn : stetson ] will introduce a systematic bias in such a way that a source that is variable in only one band will not be recognized as variable . [ sect : chi2 ] for sources outside the primary target fields or for sources which are too bright or too faint in one irac channel , the stetson index can not be calculated . for those sources we rely on the reduced chi - squared value to detect variability : @xmath64 instrumental uncertainties lead to a non - gaussian error distribution , so we use a conservative cut - off and mark sources as variable only if @xmath65 ( paper i ) . using this metric , we find 22 sources that exhibit variability in irac1 and 18 that exhibit variability in irac2 . for comparison , we note that of the 38 sources classified as variable according to their stetson index in the last section , 34 are also variable according to the @xmath22 test for their irac1 lightcurve and 37 according to their irac2 lightcurve . the @xmath66 calculated for the first visibility window only can be found in table [ tab : tab2 ] in column ` redchi2tomeans1_36 ` and ` redchi2tomeans1_45 ` for irac i and irac 2 , respectively , and for the entire lightcurve in columns ` redchi2tomean_36 ` and ` redchi2tomean_45 ` , again for irac 1 and irac 2 , respectively . examples are shown in figure [ fig : chi2lc ] . if we fit a linear slope instead of comparing to the mean ( i.e. a constant ) , the results are the same . many sources have significantly larger values of @xmath66 for the whole observation series than within one visibility window , indicating a constant luminosity over 40 days , but a change over timescales between six months and two years . ccccc cfhtwir - oph 29 & [ 3.6]-[4.5 ] & 2.6 & 0.03 & f + iso - oph 138 & [ 3.6 ] & 3.3 & 0.00 & ii + sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 & [ 3.6 ] & 4.1 & 0.00 & i + iso - oph 152 & [ 3.6 ] & 4.7 & 0.03 & ii + [ gy92 ] 30 & [ 3.6 ] & 14.5 & 0.00 & i + wl 11 & [ 4.5 ] & 3.0 & 0.01 & ii + 2mass j16271881 - 2448523 & [ 4.5 ] & 6.4 & 0.00 & iii + sstysv j162622.19 - 242352.2 & [ 4.5 ] & 6.1 & 0.00 & iii + iso - oph 34 & [ 3.6 ] & 2.2 & 0.00 & f + iso - oph 33 & [ 4.5 ] & 2.4 & 0.02 & f + roxn 41 & [ 3.6 ] & 6.5 & 0.00 & ii + iso - oph 154 & [ 3.6 ] & 5.6 & 0.00 & ii + iso - oph 124 & [ 3.6 ] & 3.4 & 0.00 & i + wl 13 & [ 3.6 ] & 10.7 & 0.00 & ii + lastly , we search for periodicity in the fast - cadence ( visibility window 1 ) lightcurves using a lomb - scargle periodogram ; again , see paper i for details . we require a false alarm probability @xmath67 and to further reduce the number of false positives , we additionally run a period detection of all lightcurves on the nasa exoplanet archive periodogram service . this service employs several algorithms because each algorithm is particularly suited to a different signal shape ( see paper i or the website for details on the other algorithms ) . we also calculate the autocorrelation function of each signal . we find that the lomb - scargle periodogram is advantageous for lightcurves with @xmath68 points as is the case for most of our data . we require that at least one of three supplementary algorithms that we run retrieves a periodicity with a similar timescale ( see paper i for details ) . we only search for periods between 0.1 and 14.5 days , so that at least three periods fit in each visibility window . allowing longer periods leads to the detection of many long - term trends , where the data do not show that these trends are actually periodic . finally , all algorithmically detected periodicity is vetted by eye . if periods are found in multiple bands , we report the period in irac 1 , which is generally the most reliable due to the lower measurement uncertainties . if irac 1 does not reveal a periodicity , we report the value for the irac 2 lightcurve , and , as a last resort the period found in the [ 3.6]-[4.5 ] color to include objects where a periodic signal is overlayed by a long - term trend so that it is undetectable in each individual channel , but might be visible in the color . the final list of adopted periods is given in table [ tab : period ] . it contains sources from all sed classes . we find 14 sources that show a periodic behavior in the first visibility window , but this periodicity is not stable over more than one visibility window . the datapoints taken in the first visibility window follow the folded period much better than the data from the later visibility windows , indicating that the period is not stable for longer than a few months . in roxn 41 , the datapoints of the later visibility windows , folded with the same period , seem to follow a different , yet clearly defined lightcurve with a similar period . ten periodic sources have information in both irac bands . eight of those are already classified as variable by the stetson index . three out of four sources with data in one band only are variable according to the @xmath66 test . the remaining two sources with information in both irac bands show periodicty , but fail the stetson index test because a larger variability amplitude is required for a significant detection in stetson index , which does not make any assumption about the form of the variability compared with the lomb - scargle periodigram , that only detects periodic signals . equally , the remaining source with data in only one band fails the @xmath66 test , because the @xmath66 test also requires a larger variability amplitude for a significant detection than the lomb - scarge periodogram . the number of datapoints in visibility windows 2 , 3 , and 4 is too low to search for periodicity in those visibility windows alone . figure [ fig : periodlc ] shows the phase - folded lightcurve in one band for six periodic sources where the periodicity is significant in a single band . figure [ fig : periodcolorlc ] shows the phased lightcurve for , where the period is seen only in the color term [ 3.6]-[4.5 ] . most of the periods found in table [ tab : period ] are in the range 3 - 7 days . only two sources have longer periods of 11 and 14 days . the largest amplitude is around 0.3 mag , and the smallest around 0.05 mag . all periodic sources except roxn 41 , sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 , 2mass j16271881 - 2448523 , and sstysv j162622.19 - 242352.2 are cluster members according to our membership criteria . roxn 41 and sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 have class i and ii seds , respectively . all but cfhtwir - oph 29 ( see appendix [ sect : g09notwil ] ) , sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 ( see appendix [ sect : g09notwil ] ) , and 2mass j16271881 - 2448523 ( no information beyond the @xmath69 magnitudes is available in the literature ) are cluster members according to @xcite . ten of the 56 cluster members are periodic ; in total there are 14 periodic sources out of 60 sources that are variable in the first visibility window . in comparison , @xcite find 18% of all variable stars to be periodic in @xmath70 monitoring of the orion a molecular cloud with a similar time coverage as we have for l1688 . @xcite find a third of all variable stars in l1688 to be periodic ; due to their longer time baseline , @xcite are sensitive to different periods , but only 4 out of their 32 periods have values that are outside of the range we could detect see their table . we are sensitive to periods of up to 14.5 days here . the largest group of lightcurves in the sample of l1688 does not have any significant variability . the lower limit where variability is detected depends on the brightness of the object - fainter sources need a stronger relative variability due to the larger measurement uncertainties . paper i presents monte - carlo simulations to show that the stetson test finds variability when the amplitude is a few times larger than the average uncertainty ; the exact number depends on the signal shape . for example , the variability in a source that switches between two discrete levels will be detected when the amplitude is at least twice the uncertainty ( @xmath71 mag for a star with magnitude 14 ) . if data from only one band are available , the step size must be more than four times the uncertainty to be found by the @xmath22-test ( @xmath72 mag for a star with magnitude 14 . ) . given the observing cadence , the monte - carlo simulations show that we are sensitive to periods between 0.1 and 14.5 days ( paper i ) . in summary , we call a source variable if it is either periodic with a low false alarm probability ( 14 sources ) or fulfills one of the following conditions : sources with simultaneous data in two bands need to have a stetson index @xmath73 ( 34 sources in the ysovar standard set fast cadence data and 38 sources in total ) and sources without simultaneous data need to have @xmath65 ( 22 sources in the ysovar standard set fast cadence data and 29 sources in total ) . we consider the lightcurves for all 882 distinct sources with at least five datapoints in at least one irac band . of those lightcurves , 70 are classified as variable ; 56 sources are cluster members according to the ysovar criteria ( 44 of them are variable ) and 73 sources are cluster members according to @xcite ( 47 of them are variable ) . both membership samples have considerable overlap . in the following subsections , we compare properties of the lightcurves between different sed classes . in most cases , the lightcurves of irac1 ( 3.6@xmath12 m ) and irac2 ( @xmath6 m ) have very similar properties . figure [ fig : probvarsed ] contains the variability fraction sorted by sed class ( see section [ sect : spectralslope ] ) . within each class , the population is sub - divided into previously identified members , bright ( @xmath74 mag in @xmath32 m or @xmath33 m ) stars not previously identified as members , and faint ( @xmath75 mag ) stars not previously identified as members . sources are considered variable if they have a low false alarm probability for periodicity or a stetson index @xmath73 ( if simultaneous data in irac 1 and irac 2 exist ) or @xmath76 ( if no simultaneous data exist ) . note that the classes shown here are based on the observed sed and thus background non - member stars seen through the cloud might appear red ( like a class ii source ) even if their intrinsic sed slope is compatible with sed class iii . no star classified as a member is fainter than 14 mag . the observed fraction of variable stars as a function of sed class is the best guess for the probability to find variability for a star of a given sed class . we calculate the uncertainty for the probability based on the observed number of variable stars @xmath77 in a bin with @xmath53 total sources as follows : if the true probability for a source in the bin to be variable is @xmath78 , then the probability to observe @xmath77 variables in @xmath53 stars is given by @xmath79 , which follows a binomial distribution : @xmath80 the peak of this distribution is @xmath81 . we then calculate the boundaries of the confidence interval @xmath82 for @xmath78 such that @xmath83 and the area under the curve includes 68% of the probability . those uncertainty ranges are shown in figure [ fig : probvarsed ] . almost all known cluster members are variable ; the fraction of variables is decreasing slightly from class i to ii . there are five class iii members and none of them shows variability . this is compatible with the variability fraction observed for class iii non - members . by definition , sources with a class iii sed do not have a large ir excess over a stellar photosphere , thus they are not expected to harbor a substantial disk or show disk - related variability . however , even field stars can show significant variability , at least in the near - ir . @xcite find 1.6% of all field stars to be variable in @xmath69 . this includes eclipsing systems , stars with unusually large photospheric spots and other unidentified variables . all effects that influence the @xmath69 lightcurve are likely also visible in the mid - ir . our fraction of variable objects with a class iii sed is similar ( 1.8% ) to what wolk et al . found . in the optical and near - ir , the fraction of variable field stars is lower than that value . _ spitzer _ observations of other young clusters also find that younger stars are more variable , but with a lower variability fraction . @xcite find only 70% of all stars with disks in their onc sample to have detectable variability . @xcite find 60% in ic 348 and @xcite find @xmath84% of all members in ngc 2264 to be variable in the irac bands . all three clusters are located at larger distances and thus observations are less sensitive to small variations , the observations of @xcite are more densely sampled and thus provide a better signal . in l1688 , a k5 star with little extinction will have a magnitude of 12.2 in @xmath5 m using the evolutionary tracks of and the yso colors from @xcite . in this magnitude range , variability down to 0.05 mag can be detected ( paper i ) . in contrast , for the same star in ic 348 , the variability has to be about twice as large to be detected and three times as large to the detected in the onc . of course , even our observations miss the faint end of the distribution . thus , it seems likely that essentially all ysos show substantial mid - ir variability on timescales of days to weeks . sources with a class iii sed are not contaminated by disk - bearing stars , since reddening by the cloud can only increase the spectral slope @xmath23 but never hide an existing ir excess . the larger fraction of non - member variable objects in the other classes in figure [ fig : probvarsed ] thus shows that the membership lists are incomplete . one caveat here is that the class iii sources in the sample of members are selected in a different way than the other classes . if true class iii cluster members with x - ray emission ( that are included in our member sample ) are systematically less variable than class iii members where we do not detect x - ray emission ( that are therefore not included in the member sample ) , that would also lead to a lower observed variability fraction in class iii member sources . however , given the size of the observed effect in variability such a bias seems to be unlikely to be the sole reason for the observed distribution . the observed probability that a source is variable for all classes of bright non - members ( blue bars ) is consistent with around 5% the fact that this barely changes with the sed class , quite unlike the distribution for the cluster members , indicates that unidentified cluster members can not make up a large fraction of the non - member sample since they would bias the observed variability fraction to higher values for the earlier classes . the vastly different number of sources in the different bins makes it highly unlikely that each bin is contaminated by the same fraction of class i - ii cluster members . the sample of faint stars has almost the same fraction of variable sources in every sed class . the low fraction can be explained by two effects . first , variability of faint sources can not be reliably detected unless the amplitude is exceptionally large . second , as most cluster members are brighter than 14 mag , the faint sample contains fewer unrecognized cluster members than the sample of brighter sources . figure [ fig : meanampsed ] shows that there is a wide distribution of amplitudes in ysos of class i , f and ii . the error bars in this figure represent the standard deviation of the mean amplitudes within one class . amplitude and standard deviation in the figure are measured in magnitudes ; a median amplitude of 0.1 mag means that the flux in @xmath33 m varies by 10% for a typical source . for members , the variability amplitude is larger in class i sources than in flat - spectrum and class ii sources , where the amplitude is still larger than in class iii sources . also , the spread of the amplitudes in class i and f is much larger than for class ii and iii . for non - members , the observed amplitudes seem to follow a similar , but less pronounced trend . this suggests that the non - member category still includes not only reddened background objects with an intrinsic class iii sed , but also some unidentified cluster members . indeed , we propose that all variable class i , f and ii sources are members and table [ tab : newmembers ] lists those new members that are neither contained in our ysovar standard membership set ( see table [ tab : tab2 ] ) nor in @xcite . however , for consistency , we do not modify our sample of members at this point and continue to treat the sources in the table as non - members for the remainder of the analysis . two of the objects in the table , and were suggested as a @xmath7 oph substellar candidate members by , the remaining objects have not been studied before . in summary , the probability for any given source to be observed as a mid - ir variable decreases little between class i and ii sources , but the mean amplitude as well as the differences within a class are much larger for sources which have more circumstellar material . cccc 246.88244 & -24.79978 & sstysv j162731.78 - 244759.2 & ii + 246.64060 & -24.31667 & sstysv j162633.74 - 241900.0 & ii + 246.84236 & -24.78363 & sstysv j162722.16 - 244701.0 & ii + 246.59001 & -24.49297 & sstysv j162621.60 - 242934.7 & ii + 246.65036 & -24.40117 & sstysv j162636.08 - 242404.2 & i + 246.84092 & -24.31180 & sstysv j162721.82 - 241842.4 & ii + 246.84135 & -24.78713 & sstysv j162721.92 - 244713.6 & ii + 246.84336 & -24.64383 & cfhtwir - oph 74 & ii + 246.90225 & -24.64854 & sstysv j162736.53 - 243854.7 & ii + 246.57278 & -24.38732 & sstysv j162617.46 - 242314.3 & ii + 246.67446 & -24.25616 & sstysv j162641.86 - 241522.1 & ii + 246.91134 & -24.55516 & sstysv j162738.72 - 243318.5 & ii + 246.60121 & -24.26383 & cfhtwir - oph 21 & f + 246.88281 & -24.34855 & sstysv j162731.87 - 242054.7 & f + 246.86474 & -24.43647 & sstysv j162727.53 - 242611.2 & i + 246.59027 & -24.30560 & sstysv j162621.66 - 241820.1 & f + 246.86794 & -24.67487 & sstysv j162728.30 - 244029.5 & i + next , we will look at the timescales of the lightcurves . the list of periodic sources contains objects of all evolutionary stages , but is too small to recognize any trends in the period with evolutionary stage . we calculate the discrete auto - correlation function @xmath85 for each fast - cadence ( visibility window 1 ) lightcurve to characterise the time - scale in all sources , not just the periodic ones . one complication here is that our data are unevenly sampled . in order to calculate the @xmath86 we linearly interpolate the lightcurve on a grid with time steps of 0.1 days . this process can change the properties of the lightcurves on short timescales . however , for most lightcurves the relevant timescales are longer than the distance between two observations ( 0.1 to 0.8 days ) . we use the following definition of the @xmath86 @xmath87 where @xmath53 is the total number of points in the lightcurve @xmath88 with a mean of @xmath61 and a standard deviation of @xmath89 . in the discrete @xmath86 @xmath90 is the number of timesteps . by definition @xmath91 and the @xmath86 decays for longer time - lags @xmath90 . we take the first value of @xmath90 with @xmath92 as the characteristic time - scale for a lightcurve . a more common definition would be to use the position of the first local maximum in the @xmath86 , but due to the low number of datapoints in our lightcurves , the noise in the @xmath86 is large and this value is often not well defined . while our definition might not give us the timescale of the physical processes at work , the @xmath86 timescale still provides relative comparisons . we find that the average @xmath86 timescale decreases from 4 days for class i sources to one day for class iii sources ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . a more detailed analysis of stochastic and quasi - periodic properties of the lightcurves is beyond the scope of the current paper ( for a discussion of these properties in @xmath70 lightcurves , see * ? ? ? the majority of the stars included in our data show no significant variability , and we exclude them from further discussion . the remaining stars are definitely variable , with light curve shapes that display a variety of morphologies . visual inspection , and some quantitative analysis , allows us to group these stars into sets with similar light curve morphologies - which can be the first step in attaching physical mechanisms as the cause of the observed variability . based on a near - ir ( @xmath69 ) monitoring campaign of similar cadence and duration to ours , @xcite identified four light curve morphological classes : ( a ) periodic ; ( b ) quasi - periodic - which they defined as stars with cyclic brightening and fading , but where the frequency and amplitude of the variations varied from cycle to cycle ; ( c ) long - duration - stars with relatively long term monotonic changes in brightness over weeks or months , with eventual changes in sign of the variability ; ( d ) stochastic - which indicated all other variability types , where no obvious pattern to the variability was present . in another recent paper , @xcite analysed a @xmath93 day monitoring campaign for the star - forming region ngc 2264 , using optical data from corot and ir data from irac , to assign light curve morphology classes to their young star set . their proposed light curve morphologies were : ( i ) periodic - stars whose light curves show periodic waveforms whose amplitude and shape are unchanging or only change in minor ways over the 30 day observing window . these light curves were ascribed generally to cold spots on the stellar photosphere ; ( ii ) dippers - stars showing a well - defined maximum brightness , upon which are superposed flux dips of variable shape and amplitude . these are sub - divided into stars where the flux dips occur at an approximately constant period - designated as quasi - periodic systems - and stars with no obvious periodicity to the dips - designated aperiodic . in previous literature , these two sub - classes , or portions of them , have been referred to as aa tau systems and ux ori systems , respectively ; ( iii ) short duration bursters - stars with relatively well - defined minimum light curve levels , superposed on which are brief ( hours to day ) flux increases , attributed to accretion bursts . see @xcite for further discussion of this set ; ( iv ) quasi - periodic variables - stars lacking a well - defined maximum brightness but showing periodic variability whose waveform changes shape and amplitude from cycle to cycle ; ( v ) stochastic - stars with prominent luminosity changes on a variety of timescales , with no preference for `` up '' or `` down '' . ( vi ) long timescale variability - stars with slow ( weeks to months ) changes in brightness . while there are some clear similarities in the two schemes , their usage of the terms quasi - periodic and stochastic are not the same , and light curves described as belonging to those classes in one scheme would not necessarily be so classified in the other scheme . it will be important to resolve these nomenclature issues in the future , perhaps in the same manner as was done for sorting out similar issues on classifying pre - main sequence disk sed morphologies ( evans et al . 2009 ) . in the meantime , we must choose which scheme to adopt and be clear that is what we have done . for this paper , we adopt the @xcite scheme . periodic lightcurves are described in section [ sect : midirvariability ] and examples can be seen in figure [ fig : periodlc ] . examples of quasi - periodic lightcurves are shown in figure [ fig : morelcs ] . shows variability with a timescale @xmath94 days in the first half of the first visibility window , but around mjd 55316 , the flux increases significantly and this rise masks out any periodicity . the dip around mjd 55325 again has a similar duration as those observed in the beginning of the visibility window . the other two sources shown might be similar , but the signal - to - noise is not as good . other sources are variable , but no preferred timescale for the variability is discernible . and 51 ( figure [ fig : morelcs2 ] ) are examples of this aperiodic behavior . in yet other cases , the timescale of the variability is so long that we can not decide if a feature is a singular event or part of a recurring pattern . good examples of this are wl 4 and , which are shown in figure [ fig : cmd ] . in some cases , we see short duration features in the lightcurve in addition to a longer trend . this can either be a brightening ( e.g. mjd 55303 and 55311 in , figure [ fig : morelcs2 ] ) or short dips in the lightcurve that last between one and ten days ( in the same figure ) . like @xcite , we find that even strongly periodic sources are not perfect clocks in the mid - ir in that the amplitude can vary from cycle to cycle . there might also be phase shifts from visibility window to visibility window . in a very similar study to the one we present here , @xcite observed ic 348 over a 40 day window with irac1 and 2 and find 25% of the variable stars are likely periodic . here we find a similar division ; 10 of 52 members are strongly periodic . we present the first mid - ir monitoring of l1688 , but the field has been monitored before in the near - ir . figure [ fig : amplitudekvs36 ] compares the @xmath4 band amplitude found in 2mass data taken between 1997 and 2001 @xcite and the @xmath31 band amplitude observed at ukirt between 2005 and 2006 with the amplitude of our @xmath32 m lightcurves . given the different bands , it is not surprising that the absolute value of the amplitude differs , but there is a good correlation such that the sources with the largest @xmath31 or @xmath4 band amplitudes in earlier observations also have the largest amplitudes in the irac bands five to ten years later . in most objects , color changes are small or happen in parallel with luminosity changes ( section [ sect : colorchangesandreddening ] ) , so the @xmath31 or @xmath4 band and the [ 3.6 ] variability should be strongly correlated . figure [ fig : amplitudekvs36 ] shows that the amplitude of the variability is relatively stable over at least one decade . @xcite used a larger number of observations than and observe a larger spread between a typical yso s brightest and faintest @xmath31-band magnitude , indicating that the longest timescale of variability is longer than the time span of the observations . @xcite noted that roughly 6% of the stars in ic 348 had data which indicated significant changes in the source s mid - ir flux over the three year interval since the last irac observation . @xcite also displayed numerous examples of stars which showed continuous change over the course of at least one observing visibility window . all this shows that the amplitude of variability of a given source may evolve over very long timescales , but is consistent over at least one decade . ysos apparently do not switch between highly variable and much less variable states . of time - variable extinction . the largest @xmath95 observed is 1 , but for clearity only the region to @xmath96 mag is shown . _ bottom _ : in this panel the length of each line gives the sed class of that object . only cluster members have slopes where the source bluens as it fades . [ fig : cmdslope],title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] of time - variable extinction . the largest @xmath95 observed is 1 , but for clearity only the region to @xmath96 mag is shown . _ bottom _ : in this panel the length of each line gives the sed class of that object . only cluster members have slopes where the source bluens as it fades . [ fig : cmdslope],title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] for sources in the primary target fields , the observations in @xmath5 m and @xmath6 m are separated by only a few minutes . for those sources , we compare the color and the magnitude in the @xmath5 m band in a color - magnitude diagram ( cmd ) ( figures [ fig : morelcs ] and [ fig : cmd ] ) . in some cases , the color is fairly stable within one visibility window , but changes between visibility windows ; in others the timescale of variability is much shorter and color changes are seen within one visibility window as well . for non - variable sources , the cmd forms a point cloud with the size set by the photometric uncertainties , but for variable sources , the shape of the cmd can reveal the physical cause of the variability for example , if a disk warp or accretion funnel passes in front of a yso , we expect its color to become redder as it becomes fainter . if the absorber has the same gas and dust properties as the inter - stellar medium ( ism ) and absorbs star and inner disk at the same time , then the datapoints in the cmd follow a line with the slope of the interstellar reddening law ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) . in each cmd , the observational data ( i1 , i1-i2 ) are fit to a line segment using an orthogonal distance regression method that takes the errors in both the x and y directions into account . we calculate the length in magnitudes of the line segment excluding the 10% of the data that are outliers on either side . the cmd slopes of the 37 sources with a well - defined slope are shown in figure [ fig : cmdslope ] . the x and the y axis in the cmd are correlated , because they both depend on the @xmath5 m magnitude so sources which are noise - dominated would show a slope of @xmath97 . no source is seen in this region . from a total of 42 variable sources with cmds with at least ten datapoints , 37 can be fitted with a formal uncertainty on the best fit slope below @xmath98 . in four of the five sources with a statistical error on the slope in the cmd @xmath99 , the color variability is dominated by observational uncertainties ; the remaining source iso - oph 140 is discussed below . as can be seen in figure [ fig : cmd ] , even in those sources with a well defined slope in the cmd , the scatter around the best linear fit is larger than the measurement uncertainties ; individual visibility windows are systematically above or below the fitted line . the slopes shown in figure [ fig : cmdslope ] can be separated ( somewhat arbitrarily ) in two groups . one group becomes redder when the sources are fainter with slopes comparable to the ism reddening . this group contains almost all variables that are not classified as cluster members in section [ sect : l1688membership ] . most sources in this group have class i or flat - spectrum seds ( bottom panel ) . sources that bluen ( we use the term `` bluen '' as a verb to mean that a source comes bluer similar to the common expressions `` redden '' or `` reddening '' ) when they are fainter are mostly class ii and flat spectrum sources . figure [ fig : morelcs ] shows the lightcurves and cmds for two of the bluening sources , and . the top panel in figure [ fig : cmdslope ] quantifies the magnitude of the reddening or bluening observed in each source . for a source where the slope in the cmd is compatible with ism reddening , this can be interpreted as the @xmath95 of the intervening material . a range of values is observed , but in most sources it is @xmath49 mag . no significant difference in vector length is seen between sources that bluen or redden when they dim . we discuss the physical mechanisms that could cause these slopes in section [ sect : scenariosforcolorchanges ] . comparing the amplitudes of all sources in figure [ fig : cmdslope ] that either redden or bluen over the full time span of the observations , we do not find significant differences in value or distribution of the variability amplitudes . similar to our results , find reddening and bluening slopes in the cmd in their @xmath100 monitoring , but compared to figure [ fig : cmdslope ] they see a higher fraction of stars that bluen as they dim ( 33/49 ) . only six sources have well defined slopes in both their study and ours . in the data of , all of them belong to the group that bluen with lower fluxes . in five cases , our data agree . in contrast , roxn 44 reddens in our observations , so its behavior changed over the time interval of five years , or it is behaving differently in the near and mid - ir . is the only source with a statistical error on the slope in the cmd @xmath99 where the color variability is not dominated by observational uncertainties , but where the slope varies substantially over time . its lightcurve and cmd for the first visibility window are shown in figure [ fig : cmdsquare ] . it has a class ii sed slope and is a low mass yso ( spectral type m1 ; * ? ? ? there is no single slope in the cmd ; instead the source seems to switch between different modes . initially , the luminosity drops sharply , while the color becomes slightly bluer . the behavior changes around mjd 55305 . for the next 15 days , the source becomes redder and dimmer , but the slope is less steep than the ism reddening law . the evolution is not monotonic , but a brightening ( e.g. around mjd 55313 ) corresponds to a bluer color and the source reddens as it dims . at the end of this period , the brightness increases again sharply and the slope in the cmd is comparable to the period mjd 55295 to 55305 : the source becomes noticeably redder with higher luminosity . in the last 10 days of the monitoring , the source again has a slope close to the ism reddening law . its luminosity continues to increase and the color bluens until it has a similar color and luminosity as it did at the beginning of the monitoring . this closes the circle in the cmd . this is the only source in our sample where we observe multiple changes of the reddening slope over time . in this case , variability similar to ism reddening corresponds to slow changes in luminosity , while the other direction of the slope in the cmd is associated with faster luminosity changes . now we discuss the lightcurves with the largest changes in magnitude in our sample . wl 4 , shown in figure [ fig : cmd ] , has an outburst event consisting of a brightness increase by about 0.6 mag and bluening at the same time . the rise and fall take only a few days and the entire outburst lasts about a month . [ edj2009 ] 892 ( shown in the same figure ) presents a slow rise by about 0.2 mag in @xmath33 m and smooth decay over two years where the source gradually bluens ( although more activity between visibility windows can not be excluded ) . there is an indication of a slow and smooth increase in brightness again in the last observing visibility window , pointing to a recurring phenomenon . these timescales are much longer than the dynamical time in the inner disk , so they are presumably driven by disk phenomena that originate at larger radii . @xcite identified a few such bursting or fading events in their analysis of ysovar data for the orion nebula cluster ( onc ) and they have also been observed in the optical @xcite . the physical cause is not known yet . @xcite find a few lightcurves that match theoretical predictions for short mass accretion events , but without simultaneous spectroscopy this is hard to prove . the best example presented here , wl 4 , becomes bluer during the burst , but the opposite happens for wl 3 , which otherwise has a similar lightcurve . thus , it is likely that different mechanisms cause these burst events . the reddening sources in figure [ fig : cmdslope ] have slopes that are roughly compatible with the slope of an interstellar reddening law . small deviations can be explained by modifications of the dust - to - gas ratio or the grain size and composition . this is commonly observed in individual young stars and star forming regions as a whole @xcite . the most prominent example of a class ii source where the extinction changes on timescales of days is . in this case , the absorption dip is periodic and caused by an inner disk warp partially occulting the star . many examples of comparable lightcurves have been found in the onc by @xcite and in ngc 2264 by @xcite . these authors call objects with absorption events in the lightcuve `` dippers '' . we observe reddening on timescales of months to years in about half of all sources with a well - defined slope in the cmd . an example of that is shown in the top right panel of figure [ fig : cmd ] . we do not know the inclination of the objects in our sample , but if it is close to edge - on , this might be caused by an asymmetric disk similar to aa tau . the required warp or local change in scale height that lets some gas and dust protrude above the average disk height , could be caused by a low - mass star , brown dwarf or planetary mass object orbiting in the disk ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? alternatively , vortices in the disk or dust traps can also change the local scale height . changes in the optical brightness and color of a yso are often attributed to spots , either hot accretion spots or cold magnetic spots , rotating in and out of view or to time - variable extinction ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? if the reddening increases and , at the same time , the visible fraction of the hot spot decreases , then the resulting slope in the cmd would be intermediate between ism reddening and colorless . since spots on the star can not explain sources that bluen as they dim , this observed phenomenon must be related to the disk . several parameters of the inner disk could be time variable . the most obvious one is the accretion rate . however , the direct effect of increased accretion is a larger accretion spot , which would make the star bluer and brighter , not fainter . also , @xcite find no relation between mid - ir lightcurves and spectroscopic accretion tracers in their limited sample . this indicates that the relevant parameter can change without affecting the accretion rate . in the mid - ir , we see the optically thick dust at the inner disk edge . because the disk is heated over its entire vertical height at the inner edge while only the disk surface absorbs radiation at larger radii , it can form a puffed - up inner rim that reaches above the usual disk scale height and casts a shadow on the remaining disk , reducing the luminosity at longer wavelengths ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? if this rim grows , it intercepts more stellar light . thus , the emission from the inner wall increases and the emission from the outer disk decreases , which results in bluer colors . since the total emitting area also decreases , the source can become bluer and fainter . @xcite also present radiative transfer models with hot spots and warped disks that reproduce features of the observed lightcurves . alternatively , @xcite suggested a non - axisymmetric model . if the emission from the stellar photosphere is stronger at some longitudes due to a strong accretion spot or a spot from magnetic activity on the star , it irradiates the inner disk like a searchlight beam and causes the dust at this longitude to retreat . the result is a disk where the inner rim is broken at one ( or several ) positions . this would reduce the emission in @xmath5 m , but cause more energy to be emitted at a larger radius , where the dust is cooler on average and thus emits at longer wavelengths such as @xmath6 m . in this way , the source can become redder as it brightens . there is one group of ysos , the so - called ux ori ( uxor ) variables where several members have been observed to bluen when they fade in optical observations . this can be explained by a larger fraction of scattered light that contributes to the observed sed in their faint state . a similar scenario for the ysos discussed here requires , first , scattering by relatively large grains ( @xmath101 mm ) , because only for large grains radiation at @xmath32 m will be scattered more than radiation at @xmath33 m . grains this large will be present in the disk , but not at all radii and all disk heights . second , for this mechanism to work , a large fraction of the ir radiation must be scattered light and not intrinsic emission . in contrast , many bluening sources are class i to flat - spectrum sources , where the ir luminosity is comparable to the total stellar irradiation . none of the simple models presented so far offers a convincing explanation of the observed lightcurves and cmds . however , detailed simulations that take into account turbulent transport processes in the disk and different dust species with a complete chemical network have not yet been performed . the real situation is likely to be much more complex than sketched above . since different dust species form and sublimate with different speeds and at different temperatures , time variable irradiation can actually cause a very complex mixture of species with different opacities , which will not react linearly to increased irradiation . such a complex network might cause a delayed and non - linear response of the disk , which masks the underlying relation between accretion and disk emission . the characteristics of the time variability in the lightcurves could be related to the spectral type of the central star as hotter stars irradiate the disk with harder spectra . we compared the 90% quantiles of the observed @xmath6 m magnitudes for those sources in our sample that have spectroscopically determined spectral types from @xcite . we use the relation between spectral type and @xmath102 from @xcite . this gives values for ten objects in our sample and we do not find a correlation in this set . similarly , @xcite do not identify any trends in infarared variability versus effective temperature among few myr old ngc 2264 stars . in apparent contrast , @xcite find that the variability in [ 3.6 ] and [ 4.5 ] increases with increasing @xmath102 , but they show that this trend probably does not reflect a change in disk properties , but is instead due to the lower relative contribution of the photosphere compared to the disk for hotter stars . in this section , we analyze the subsample of sources with x - ray counterparts . since the subsample is not selected for its ir properties , it provides a clean sample to calculate the variability fraction . there are 31 sources with detected x - ray emission , of which 20 are variable in the ir . again , we find high variability fractions in class i ( 6/7 ) , f ( 3/4 ) and ii ( 11/15 ) , while none of the four class iii sources is variable . the sample size is small , but this is consistent with our analysis of the ir selected sample in section [ sect : evolutionarytrendsofthevariability ] . we searched for correlations between the parameters of the x - ray emission ( median energy , fitted temperature and absorbing column density ) and the amplitude of the mid - ir variability . no such correlation is apparent within each sed class . for a given absorbing column density , soft x - ray emission is more strongly absorbed than hard x - ray emission . thus , the observed x - ray spectrum from more embedded sources always appears harder . since class ii sources have more circumstellar matter than class iii sources , it is not surprising that they appear harder . @xcite already discuss this for the l1688 x - ray data ; figure [ fig : probvarsed ] and [ fig : meanampsed ] show that class ii sources are more variable than class iii sources . we see no additional effect of the x - ray emission on the variability characteristics in the mid - ir . we present _ spitzer _ observations of ysos in the star forming region l1688 . observations were taken in four visibility windows in spring and fall of 2010 and 2011 , with about 70 observations in spring 2010 and about ten observations in the remaining visibility windows . the cadence of the observations is non - uniform to avoid bias in the period detection . our sample consists of 882 sources with lightcurves in irac1 and irac2 with at least 5 datapoints . of those 882 sources , we classify 70 sources as variable using the stetson test , the @xmath22 test and the lomb - scagle periodogram . the faintest sources in the sample have @xmath103 mag , but naturally the measurement uncertainties are larger for fainter sources . the algorithms detect variability if the amplitude is larger than @xmath104 mag for a source of @xmath105 mag . we define a sample of cluster members , including sources with an ir excess due to a circumstellar disk or with x - ray emission . for cluster members , there is a clear correlation between evolutionary status and ir variability . more embedded sources are more often detected to be variable , and they have on average larger variability amplitudes . overall , the data are consistent with the idea that all ysos are variable at @xmath5 m and @xmath6 m , and we thus propose that all variable sources in our sample are members of the l1688 star forming region . qualitatively different morphological types of lightcurves can be distinguished : 14 lightcurves are detected to be periodic ; beyond that , we find quasi - periodic lightcurves , where the variability has an apparent timescale , but is not regular enough to be detected as periodic ; aperiodic lightcurves without a preferred timescale ; and long - term variable lightcurves where variability is apparent , but no periodicity or time - scale can be determined within the observational window . in addition , there are lightcurves with short , non - repeating bursts or dips . roughly half of all sources become redder when they are fainter ; the other half becomes bluer . the reddening values of the first group are compatible with ism reddenig . the color changes in the second group require variability in the inner disk structure as proposed by @xcite or @xcite . this work is based on observations made with the spitzer space telescope , which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology under a contract with nasa . support for this work was provided by nasa through an award issued by jpl / caltech . this research made use of astropy , a community - developed core python package for astronomy @xcite . this research has made use of the simbad database and the vizier catalogue access tool , both operated at cds , strasbourg , france and of data products from the two micron all sky survey , which is a joint project of the university of massachusetts and the infrared processing and analysis center / california institute of technology , funded by the national aeronautics and space administration and the national science foundation . acknowledges spitzer grant 1490851 . h.y.a.m . and p.p . acknowledge support by the ipac visiting graduate fellowship program at caltech / ipac . p.p . also acknowledges the jpl research and technology development and exoplanet exploration programs . rag gratefully acknowledges funding support from nasa adap grants nnx11ad14 g and nnx13af08 g and caltech / jpl awards 1373081 , 1424329 , and 1440160 in support of spitzer space telescope observing programs . s.j.w . was supported by nasa contract nas8 - 03060 . _ facilities : _ : : we identify 2mass j16272802 - 2439335 with because they match within the positional accuracy and the observed flux densities fit nicely together in a sed . : : after a visual inspection of the 2mass images , which form the basis of @xcite , we also identify 2mass j16273288 - 2428116 with . : : based on the position and the expected shape of the sed for a yso , we also identify [ gpj2008 ] source 3 with . : : we propose that [ amd2002 ] j162724 - 242850 and are the same source , because their positions match and the fluxes form an sed that is fully consistent with a yso in l1688 . and : : [ sect : misidentified ] in comparison with @xcite , we find that is erroneously identified with source oph l1688 3 in simbad . the distance between the positions on the sky is 13 , much larger than the positional uncertainty . therefore , the name is not used in our source table . ylw 16 : : in one case , the simbad database does contain a reference to a multiple source ( ) , that is resolved in the ir . we associate our lightcurves with , which is the dominant component . : : the ukidss @xmath31-band image shows at least two sources within 1 of iso - oph 152 with partially overlapping point - spread functions ( sourceids 442426789990 and 442426789990 ) . the position of the second source is uncertain and fitted differently in the other bands ( where it is called source i d 442426789991 ) . all of this is not resolved in the irac data ; thus , in each band , we assign the brightest magnitude of either of those sources to iso - oph 152 . [ sect : g09notwil ] : : this source detected in several near - ir observations and is known to be variable in that wavelength range . this source is part of the triple system that is well resolved in sub - mm observations . based on its sed stretching out to 6 cm , this is a class i source , which matches the classification we derive from the ir data . most likely , this souce contributes to the seizable outflows observed from the triple system , which would further confirm its youth and thus its status as a cluster member @xcite . : : this source is detected at @xmath106 m , but not at @xmath107 m by @xcite but no further information is available in the literature . : : in @xcite , this objects is listed as a yso and potential member of l1688 based on the g09 sed classification and a match to a scuba source at @xmath108 m . however , the next peak of the scuba flux is 29 from the position of [ gmm2009 ] oph l1688 30 , just below the maximum distance for a match that is accepted in that work . : : this source is also listed as a yso with a scuba flux peak 20 away @xcite . : : we find that this source is mismatched in simbad ( see section [ sect : misidentified ] ) . there are several radio observations in molecular lines and in the continuum which indicate substantial circumstellar material and thus confirm the status as a yso , but if sstc2d j162621.7 - 242250 and [ gmm2009 ] oph l1688 3 are different sources either of them could be the source of the radio signatures . , a. , whitney , b. , wood , k. , plavchan , p. , terebey , s. , stauffer , j. r. , morales - calderon , m. , & ysovar . 2013 , in american astronomical society meeting abstracts , vol . 221 , american astronomical society meeting abstracts , # 256.10 Abstract:
[ "the emission from young stellar objects ( ysos ) in the mid - ir is dominated by the inner rim of their circumstellar disks . we present an ir - monitoring survey of @xmath0 objects in the direction of the lynds 1688 ( l1688 ) star forming region over four visibility windows spanning 1.6 years using the _ spitzer _ space telescope in its warm mission phase . among all lightcurves , 57 sources are cluster members identified based on their spectral - energy distribution and x - ray emission . almost all cluster members show significant variability . the amplitude of the variability is larger in more embedded ysos . ten out of 57 cluster members have periodic variations in the lightcurves with periods typically between three and seven days , but even for those sources , significant variability in addition to the periodic signal can be seen . no period is stable over 1.6 years . non - periodic lightcurves often still show a preferred timescale of variability which is longer for more embedded sources . about half of all sources exhibit redder colors in a fainter state . this is compatible with time - variable absorption towards the yso . the other half becomes bluer when fainter . these colors can only be explained with significant changes in the structure of the inner disk . no relation between mid - ir variability and stellar effective temperature or x - ray spectrum is found ." ]
19,113
19,113
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the recent experimental developments in ultracold fermi gases and in particular the experimental realization of the bec - bcs crossover through feshbach resonance @xcite have arised in a field where theoretical investigations started a long time ago . indeed fairly soon after the publication of the bardeen - cooper - shrieffer ( bcs ) theory @xcite , the extension to the neutral fermi liquid @xmath4he was considered @xcite . although the case of liquid @xmath4he is more complex than the one of ultracold gases , it is nevertheless analogous to the situation found on the bcs side of the crossover , in the strong interaction regime . similarly the possibility of bose - einstein condensation ( bec ) of composite bosons was considered quite early for excitons in semiconductors @xcite , where the composite nature of these bosons is expected to be an essential physical feature . this is the situation met in the bec range of the bec - bcs crossover . deep theoretical investigation of this last situation was made not long afterwards by keldysh and kozlov @xcite , following a seminal work by popov @xcite which considered a physical model with short range potentials , much closer to the ultracold gas case . in both cases , due to the formal similarity between the bogoliubov and the bcs frameworks , the theoretical treatment relied on the fact that in the dilute limit the formalism leads directly to the schrdinger equation for the molecular state corresponding to the composite boson . this provided an anticipation of the study of the whole bec - bcs crossover . independently eagles @xcite , in the course of a study of superconductivity in doped semiconductors ( where the electron gas has a low concentration compared to standard metals ) , was led to investigate the extrapolation of the simple bcs formalism toward the dilute regime where pair formation would take place , due to the attractive interaction , and bose condensation of these pairs should occur at lower temperatures . in the context of cold gases , the physics of the crossover was considered by leggett @xcite , who stressed the physical interest of considering cooper pairs as giant molecules , emphasized the change of physical regime when the chemical potential goes through zero , and introduced the scattering length in the bcs formulation . the matter was taken up by nozires and schmitt - rink @xcite who studied the smooth evolution of the critical temperature in the crossover within the simplest @xmath5matrix approximation , showing in particular how the critical temperature of the ideal bose gas is recovered in the strong coupling limit . s de melo , randeria and engelbrecht @xcite addressed the crossover with the functional integral formalism . as it has often been stressed , the physical situation found in this bec - bcs crossover is extremely interesting since ( at least for wide feshbach resonances @xcite ) the scattering length @xmath6 of the different fermions with mass @xmath7 is enough to fully describe their interaction , while one has still to deal with the full complexity of a strongly interacting system . as a result the theoretical problem has not been solved exactly and one has to rely on various approximate schemes @xcite , the simplest one being the straight bcs formalism ( often called bcs - mf ) which is known to give a correct description at zero temperature in both the extreme bec and bcs limits @xmath8 . the imperfections of the approximate treatments are clearer in the bec regime . indeed if one wants to describe properly the departure from the ideal bose gas of dimers , one has to provide a correct description of the dimer - dimer interaction , in order to find the expected physics of a weakly interacting bose gas . as stressed by keldysh and kozlov @xcite the composite nature of the dimers has already to be properly taken into account at this stage in order to obtain correct results . a first step in this direction for the specific case of short range interactions , relevant for cold gases , was made by haussmann @xcite who obtained , both in the normal and in the superfluid state ( where this can be found naturally out of the bcs ansatz ) , that the dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath1 is related to the fermion scattering length @xmath6 by @xmath9 . this result was also obtained in ref.@xcite in the superfluid state by other methods . the level of approximation corresponding to this result turns out to be the born approximation for the dimer - dimer scattering . at the same level of approximation pieri and strinati @xcite derived quite recently the gross - pitaevskii equation from the bogoliubov - de gennes equations . however this level of approximation was markedly improved by pieri and strinati @xcite who performed the calculation at the level of a @xmath5matrix approximation and found @xmath10 . nevertheless their calculation does not include all the processes resulting from the existence of the fermions making up these composite bosons . the exact numerical result was obtained recently by petrov , salomon and shlyapnikov @xcite who basically solved the relevant schrdinger equation for the four - body problem and found for this dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath11 . thereafter it was shown @xcite how this same problem could be exactly formulated and solved within the methods of quantum field theory , with naturally exactly the same result . this last work is quite relevant to the present paper , and represents the basis out of which we will work . this is naturally linked to the fact that field theoretic methods are a convenient , and probably necessary , framework for an exact formulation and solution of this superfluid strong coupling problem raised by the bec - bcs crossover . in this paper , we provide an exact approach to the bec - bcs crossover problem from the bec side by presenting an exact fermionic theory of a bec superfluid of composite bosons in the low density range . the two interacting fermion species we deal with are actually the two lowest energy hyperfine states used experimentally @xcite in ultracold gases of @xmath12li or @xmath13k , and as it is usually done we will for convenience refer to them as `` spin up '' and `` spin down '' states . specifically working in the low density range means that we proceed basically to an expansion in powers of the gas density . otherwise our framework is completely general . in the present paper we deal with the lower orders in this expansion , but nothing in principle prevents our approach to be extended to higher orders , although admittedly this will require much more work . similarly we will restrict ourselves to the @xmath14 situation , which brings strong simplifications as we will see because in this case there are no fermions at all in the normal state . however it is quite possible to extend our approach to non zero temperature . finally we deal here with thermodynamics , but our framework allows us naturally to calculate dynamical quantities . as we mentionned our approach is in principle a low density expansion . however the density @xmath0 is not a convenient basic parameter since it rather appears in the formalism as the result of a calculation . on the other hand it is known ( and we will see it explicitely below ) that in the simple bcs approximation for the bec limit , which as mentionned above corresponds to a born approximation at the level of the mean field term , the density @xmath0 is proportional to @xmath15 , where @xmath16 is the gap parameter of the bcs theory . hence a convenient way to proceed effectively to a low density expansion is rather to expand in powers of @xmath16 . however this quantity is specific of the bcs approximation , which has no general validity . but it is directly related to the anomalous self - energy @xmath17 ( where @xmath18 is an energy - momentum four - vector ) which is a completely general microscopic quantity characteristic of a superfluid system . hence our method will specifically be an expansion of the general equations in powers of the anomalous self - energy @xmath17 . here we will calculate the equation of state , or more precisely the dependence of the chemical potential @xmath19 on the density @xmath0 ( a short account of our calculation has already been published @xcite ) . actually this is rather the reciprocal of this function which comes naturally out of the calculation , since @xmath19 enters the green s functions while @xmath0 is obtained at the end of the calculation , after elimination of @xmath17 which comes in the intermediate steps . the lowest order term in the expression of @xmath19 , beyond the trivial term of half the molecular binding energy @xmath20 , is the mean - field term . one has to note that , even at this stage , the composite nature of the bosons we deal with is entering as noted by keldysh and kozlov @xcite . however in our case it is lumped into the full dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath1 . this result is physically natural since , beyond the zeroth order term @xmath20 in the chemical potential @xcite corresponding to an isolated molecule , we expect in a density expansion to find the physics of two coexisting molecules , which should be fully describable by @xmath1 for its static properties , corresponding to the zero energy scattering properties . nevertheless , as far as we know , this quite reasonable result has always been in the literature more or less taken for granted or cursorily obtained , but not fully explicitely derived from a microscopic theory for composite bosons . hence our first step will be to obtain this fully explicit derivation . however we are naturally essentially interested by the next order term , at which we will also limit our present calculation . from the theory of weakly interacting elementary bosons this term is proportional to @xmath2 , as first obtained by lee and yang @xcite . we refer to this term as the lhy term . this term has then been rederived by beliaev @xcite making use of field theoretic methods . naturally it is reasonable to expect that a similar term arises for composite bosons . what is however less clear is that the coefficient is just the same as for elementary bosons , i.e. that it can be simply expressed in the same way in terms of @xmath1 . indeed it is clear that , at some stage in the expansion , the composite nature of the bosons will enter by other quantities than those describing the physics of elementary bosons . this is quite obvious physically since , by going to higher densities ( which corresponds to take into account higher order terms in the expansion ) , we will go toward unitarity and find physical properties linked to the existence of fermi seas . obviously this can not be obtained from the physics of elementary bosons . hence it is conceivable that additional processes contribute to the @xmath2 term for composite bosons . nevertheless we will find at the end of our paper that the @xmath2 term is indeed identical to the lhy term provided the dimer - dimer scattering length is used . the fact that this is not obvious is immediately realized from the number and the complexity of our steps , which do not map systematically on the elementary boson derivation . on the other hand this result makes sense physically when it is realized that the lhy term is directly linked to the existence of the gapless collective mode . a standard perturbation expansion should produce a @xmath3 term as the next term after the mean - field one . the existence of the lhy term is linked to the presence of these gapless elementary excitations which produce a singularity in the expansion , leading formally to a divergence in the coefficient of the @xmath3 term . obtaining the proper result is equivalent to the resummation of a partial series to all order in perturbations in order to get rid of the singularity . since these steps involve only low energies , they do not test the internal structure of the bosons which comes into play when energies of order of the binding energy @xmath21 are involved . in such a case it is reasonable that no difference appears between elementary and composite bosons . on the other hand the calculation of the coefficient of the regular @xmath3 term in the expansion involves the consideration of energies of order of the binding energy , as we will see explicitely , making explicit the composite nature of the bosons . this implies that at the level of this term one finds a result different from the case of elementary bosons . note that this result has been previously assumed to be correct in calculations of collective mode frequencies @xcite . on one hand this was in agreement with monte - carlo calculations @xcite , and on the other hand this has been supported by very recent experiments @xcite . at the level of handling the collective mode , very strong analogies with a purely bosonic approach , in particular with beliaev s work @xcite will appear for obvious physical reasons , although it can be seen that our treatment bypasses a good deal of beliaev s detailed diagrammatic analysis . we will not try to put these analogies away , but rather make use of these similarities and correspondances to make easier the physical and technical understanding of our calculation . however we will never make an actual use of a bosonic approach and all our theory is a purely fermionic theory , the essential physical feature being that we deal with fermion physics but with negative chemical potential @xmath22 . in particular we often use the word dimer to describe two fermions with spin up and spin down . but since the theory contains , in the corresponding propagator , not only the bound state of these fermions but also the scattering states , it should be taken as a simple convenient wording , although it is naturally physically suggestive . more generally and formally the anomalous self - energies @xmath23 and @xmath24 play clearly a role analogous to @xmath25 and @xmath26 for bosonic superfluidity . our paper is organized according to the above introduction . after introducing briefly the general formalism in the next section [ general ] , we proceed to the calculation of the normal and anomalous self - energies in section [ deltexp ] to lowest order in @xmath17 , which leads us to the mean field term in the expression of the chemical potential . then in section [ collmod ] we proceed to discuss the collective mode which plays an essential role in the calculation of the lhy term . then the calculation of the contribution of this collective mode to the normal and anomalous self - energies is performed in section [ sigcollmod ] , at the end of which the lhy contribution to the chemical potential is obtained . a number of technical details are treated in appendices , to try to make more palatable the main part of this paper which is already fairly heavy . our work deals only with the @xmath14 situation . hence it would be most natural to use the standard @xmath14 green s function formalism and naturally all the content of our paper can be reproduced with this formalism . however one has in this case to be careful in dealing with real frequencies , and specify precisely the location , with respect to the real axis , of singularities in the corresponding complex plane . this is often left implicit . a simple way to clarify this question is to deal with complex frequencies . but this is actually what one has to do naturally when one works at @xmath27 , where the frequencies run on the imaginary frequency axis . in the @xmath28 limit the discrete sums over matsubara frequencies turn into integrals over frequencies running on the imaginary axis ( the link with the @xmath14 formalism is merely obtained by continuing analytically the frequencies toward the real frequency axis , that is performing a so - called wick rotation on the frequency ) . this leads to somewhat clearer results . hence , despite its somewhat artificial character , we will work quite specifically with this @xmath14 limit of the @xmath27 formalism . actually this will not appear in many our expressions because of their formal nature and for this reason it does not make any real problem . the essential point is that , in this way , we will always have perfectly regular expressions , with an effective handling which is quite clear and easy . we deal only with the formalism of fermionic superfluidity , as it is known in superconductivity @xcite and superfluid @xmath4he @xcite . this entails the use of both the normal fermionic green s functions @xmath29 , where we make use of the four - vector notation @xmath30 , and their anomalous counterpart @xmath31 and @xmath32 , where we make use of standard notations @xcite . this could be written in a compact nambu formalism , but for clarity we prefer to write the normal and anomalous parts explicitely , with slightly different sign conventions . in practice we will always consider in the following , when we calculate @xmath33 , that we deal with @xmath34 , without writing it explicitely for simplicity . the existence ( i.e. the fact that they are non zero ) of these anomalous green s function is the basic ingredient of fermionic superfluidity in our formalism . this is quite clear physically since they are related to the condensate . , [ eqdysona]),width=377 ] we start by writing dyson s equations for this superfluid : @xmath35 their corresponding diagrammatic representation being given in fig . [ figdyson ] . here @xmath36^{-1}$ ] is the free atom green s function , with @xmath37 the atom kinetic energy @xmath38 measured from the chemical potential @xmath19 . the quantities @xmath39 and @xmath17 are respectively the normal and the anomalous self - energies . by definition @xmath39 is the sum of all diagrams , with one entering @xmath18 line and one outgoing @xmath18 line , which can not separated into two disconnected parts by cutting a single @xmath40 line ( or @xmath41 line ) . @xmath17 has the same definition except that it has two entering lines , one ( @xmath42 ) line and one ( @xmath43 ) line . we note that @xmath17 depends naturally in the general case on momentum and frequency . in the second equation , for @xmath32 which begins with an outgoing ( @xmath43 ) line and finishes with an outgoing ( @xmath42 ) line , it would look more symmetrical to introduce a corresponding anomalous self - energy @xmath44 , analogous to @xmath17 , but with two outgoing lines , one ( @xmath45 ) line and one ( @xmath46 ) line . however it can be related directly to @xmath47 by time reversal , as we have written explicitely . all formulae in the following turn out to be simpler to interpret when this substitution is done , and we will follow this standard habit . we note also that , since we deal with an equilibrium situation , where the gas is homogeneous , we do not need to introduce green s functions with different entering and outgoing momenta , as it would be required in the case of an inhomogeneous system . dyson s equations eq . ( [ eqdyson ] ) can be understood as a way of ordering the full perturbation expansion , by gathering terms into @xmath39 and @xmath17 . however it is interesting to note that this can be done in slightly different ways . for example we can gather in eq . ( [ eqdyson ] ) all the terms where only the free green s function @xmath40 and the normal self - energy @xmath39 appear , that is the terms where no anomalous terms are present . this leads to introduce @xmath48 , that is @xmath49 . in this way , by making use of @xmath50 instead of @xmath40 , we are only left to write in dyson s equations the anomalous terms , that is to rewrite these equations as : @xmath51 it is indeed checked easily that the algebraic solution of eq . ( [ eqdyson],[eqdysona ] ) , as well as the one of eq . ( [ eqdyson1 ] , [ eqdyson1a ] ) , is indeed : @xmath52 making use of the expression of @xmath53 this can be rewritten as : @xmath54\end{aligned}\ ] ] this result could have been obtained directly in the following way . in the definition we have taken above for the self - energy , we had excluded diagrams made of two blocks linked by a single propagator @xmath40 ( corresponding to an atom propagating to the right , as for the definition of the normal self - energy ) or @xmath41 ( corresponding to an atom propagating to the left , as it is produced by the anomalous self - energies ) . however we could take another definition where we would exclude only blocks linked by a rightward propagator , just as in the normal state . in this case the formal expression of @xmath33 in terms of the self - energy , i.e. @xmath55 , is just the same as in the normal state , as it is indeed the case in eq . ( [ eqdysonsol1 ] ) . but the expression of the self - energy has been naturally modified from @xmath39 to @xmath56 . indeed we have to include now terms containing leftward propagators @xmath41 . but it is easily realized that these new terms contain at most a product @xmath57 , corresponding to the presence of anomalous self - energies of opposite types at the extremities of the block . these two anomalous self - energies can be separated by any number of leftward propagators @xmath41 , with normal self - energies @xmath58 . the sum of all these produces a factor @xmath59 , which leads to the relation : @xmath60 in agreeement with eq . ( [ eqdysonsol1 ] ) . while they are completely general , the considerations presented in the preceding section are not of much practical use since we have no expressions for the normal and anomalous self - energies . in order to obtain explicit expressions , we will now begin to proceed along the lines outlined in the introduction , namely to perform a systematic expansion in powers of @xmath16 . in the present section , as an introduction and as a first step , we will only consider the lowest order in this expansion . the next order will then be addressed in the next section . in the first subsection we will consider the expansion of the normal self - energy , which turns out to be the easier one . then the anomalous self - energy will be handled along the same lines . as we have indicated in the introduction , and as we will check explicitely below , the expansion in powers of @xmath16 has the character of an expansion in powers of the density @xmath0 since we will find @xmath62 . hence the zeroth order in powers of @xmath16 corresponds to an infinitely dilute gas for which the normal self - energy is naturally zero . since by its definition this normal self - energy contains only processes which conserve globally the number of particles , the lowest order term @xmath63 in the normal self - energy must contain both @xmath16 and @xmath64 , because @xmath16 implies from its definition the annihilation of two atoms ( going physically in the condensate ) , while @xmath64 corresponds to the creation of two atoms ( coming out of the condensate ) . hence this lowest order term in the normal self - energy is the sum of all diagrams which contain @xmath65 and @xmath66 , and which have one entering line @xmath18 and one outgoing line @xmath18 , the rest of the diagrams containing only ( since we proceed to an expansion ) @xmath67 quantities , that is normal state quantities ( see fig . [ figt3 ] ) . we call the sum of all these normal state diagrams the normal part of @xmath63 . this is just @xmath63 , except for the @xmath65 and @xmath66 terms . , width=226 ] explicitely this means that this normal part of the diagrams contains only any number of bare propagators @xmath40 and of interactions lines . moreover the two atom lines coming out of @xmath66(with opposite spins ) are not allowed to interact immediately after entering the normal part of the diagram , since such an interaction is already included in @xmath66 ( as we will see explicitely below ) and allowing it would amount to double counting of diagrams . similarly the two atom lines entering @xmath65 are not allowed to interact immediately before . as it happens , such a normal state set of diagrams has already been essentially considered in ref.@xcite . indeed in this paper the scattering of a single atom by a dimer ( made of atoms with opposite spins ) has been calculated . the fact that a dimer is entering the diagram implied that the two corresponding atom lines can not interact immediately in the diagram , since such an interaction is already taken into account in the dimer propagator and this would be again double counting . there is a similar requirement for the two lines corresponding to the outgoing dimer . we see that the requirements on the normal part of @xmath63 are just the same as in the above paper . in this ref.@xcite the sum of all these diagrams was denoted @xmath68 where @xmath69 ( respectively @xmath70 ) is the four - vector of the entering ( respectively outgoing ) atom , and @xmath71 is the total four - vector of the single atom and the dimer . in our statement we apparently overlook the fact that @xmath68 contains only three atom lines , which go from the beginning to the end of the diagram , with various interactions between them in the diagram , since we deal with the vacuum scattering of an atom and a dimer . in contrast we could think that , in addition to these lines , the normal part of @xmath63 may contain any number of loops of atom lines . however it is clear physically that these loops are not allowed . indeed if we think of this normal part as representing , in a time representation , a succession of processes due to interaction , the appearance of a loop corresponds to the creation of a particle - hole pair . while such processes can always occur at non zero temperature , in our @xmath14 situation they are possible only if the chemical potential @xmath19 is positive , thereby allowing the existence of a fermi sea in which the hole can be created . but in our dilute regime we have @xmath72 and these processes are forbidden . this argument is developped more technically in appendix [ appnoloop ] . hence it is correct to identify the normal part of @xmath63 with @xmath73 since both contain only three atom lines , subject to the same restrictions indicated above . nevertheless there is still a small difference in the general case between the normal part we want and @xmath73 . in the definition of @xmath73 one has to sum over all possible four - vectors for the two lines making up the entering dimer , with the only restriction that their sum is fixed at @xmath74 . a similar summation applies for the two lines making up the outgoing dimer . on the other hand in our normal part the two lines ( p,@xmath75 ) and ( -p,@xmath76 ) entering in @xmath65 have a total zero four - vector , and because @xmath65 depends on @xmath77 , when we sum over @xmath77 , there is a weight @xmath65 which depends on @xmath77 , in contrast with the case of @xmath73 . nevertheless , as shown in appendix [ appt3 ] , it is possible to express in the general case our self - energy in terms of @xmath73 . but in our specific problem , this is an unnecessary complication since we will see that , at the order of the expansion we are considering , the dependence of @xmath65 on @xmath77 can be neglected , and @xmath65 can be considered as a constant which we denote merely as @xmath16 . hence we can factor @xmath61 out . similar considerations apply to @xmath78 and the entering dimer lines . there is still a very important point to consider before writing our expression for @xmath63 . among all the diagrams we have considered contributing to @xmath63 , there is necessarily a diagram which gives a contribution @xmath79 because it satisfies all our requirements . indeed this is just what is coming from the lowest order diagram in @xmath73 , which gives a contribution @xmath80 to @xmath73 and corresponds merely to the born approximation . this diagram is necessarily present because we considered it already in the preceding section [ general ] , when we were dealing with the general expansion of @xmath33 in powers of @xmath81 and @xmath17 . this is just the last term in eq.([eqdysonsol1 ] ) , when we replace @xmath59 by @xmath41 ( since we want only normal state diagrams ) and take @xmath17 independent of @xmath18 . however , since it is already explicitely present in eq.([eqdysonsol1 ] ) , this implies automatically that it is reducible ( and indeed it is obviously reducible ) and for this reason should not be included in @xmath63 ( otherwise we would double count this diagram ) . on the other hand this is clearly the only reducible contribution coming from @xmath73 , as seen directly from the diagrammatic expansion @xcite of @xmath73 , or because any such reducible contribution has to appear explicitely from eq.([eqdysonsol1 ] ) as explained above . accordingly we have to subtract this contribution out and we obtain finally : @xmath82 we can also rewrite this result in terms of our self - energy @xmath83 as : @xmath84 this result is also directly quite natural since , when we evaluate @xmath83 , the diagrams with @xmath41 are not considered as reducible , as we have seen , and accordingly @xmath79 should not be subtracted . we are now in position to calculate the single spin atomic density @xmath0 , which is given quite generally by : @xmath85 if @xmath86 is replaced by @xmath87 , one checks easily that @xmath88 , which is physically obvious since in this case we deal with a non interacting fermion gas , at @xmath14 , and chemical potential @xmath22 . there is no fermi sea ( which arises only for @xmath89 ) and there are no fermions . hence we can replace completely generally @xmath33 by @xmath90 in eq . ( [ eqdefn ] ) . since we work in this section at the lowest order in @xmath16 , which means at order @xmath91 in the present case , we can replace @xmath92 by @xmath93 , and @xmath33 by @xmath40 . this leads to : @xmath94 ^ 2 \label{eqdefn1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , as in eq . ( [ eqdefn ] ) , @xmath18 is for @xmath95 . at this stage it seems that , in order to calculate the density , we are required to have a deep knowledge of @xmath73 . this seems physically reasonable since , in eq . ( [ eqdefn1 ] ) , @xmath73 describes the scattering of an atom with the condensate which has clearly to be taken into account . however the actual situation turns out to be much simpler . in order to calculate the integral over @xmath96 in eq . ( [ eqdefn1 ] ) , it is convenient to close the contour in the upper complex half - plane @xmath97 ( which corresponds to @xmath98 ) , since the pole of @xmath99^{-1}$ ] is found for @xmath100 ( since @xmath101 ) . however it is shown in appendix [ appt3anal ] that , except for the born contribution , @xmath102 is analytical in the upper complex half - plane and does not contribute to the integral . the result comes entirely from the born contribution . this means that surprisingly the contribution of @xmath63 to @xmath0 is zero , and that the only non zero contribution comes from the explicit bcs term @xmath103 in eq . ( [ eqsigm ] ) . in other words the approximate bcs formalism gives the exact result at the lowest order in our @xmath16 expansion . it reads : @xmath104 ^ 2=\frac{m^2\,|\delta |^2}{8\pi ( 2m|\mu |)^{1/2}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] if we make use in this result of the zeroth order value of the fermion chemical potential @xmath105 , we end up with : @xmath106 actually this relation @xmath107 is precisely obtained from the dimer propagator @xmath108 ( see section [ collmod ] ) when it is evaluated near its pole and with the purely bosonic propagator factor merely replaced by @xmath0 . we proceed now in a somewhat similar way for the anomalous self - energy . the resulting equation is the generalization of the standard gap equation of the conventional bcs theory and it has the same character of being finally a self - consistent equation for @xmath17 . in writing an expression for @xmath17 , we can in full generality separate all contributing diagrams in two sets . in the first set , for both of the two entering fermionic lines , the first interaction is between these lines themselves . the second set corresponds to the opposite case , where for at least one of these two entering lines the first interaction is with a line which is not the other entering fermionic line ( see fig.[figxxa ] ) . this separation of the diagrams in two classes is completely analogous to the separation of the diagrams , coming in the standard self - energy @xcite , into an hartree - fock like set and another set involving the full vertex . the set of diagrams where the two fermionic lines interact can be immediately written in terms of @xmath31 , which is analogous ( and actually directly related ) to @xmath32 , except that it has , instead of outgoing lines , an ingoing ( @xmath46 ) line and an ingoing ( @xmath45 ) line . it satisfies a dyson s equation analogous to eq . ( [ eqdyson],[eqdysona ] ) , namely : @xmath109 introducing the fourier transform @xmath110 of the bare instantaneous interaction between @xmath75-atom and @xmath76-atom , this first contribution to the anomalous self - energy is : @xmath111 which has naturally just the form of the standard bcs term . let us now switch to the other set of diagrams , for which we proceed to an expansion similar to the one carried out in the preceding subsection . because of particle conservation this expansion involves now odd powers in @xmath112 ) . we consider first the term proportional to @xmath113 . the normal part of this diagram contains only one @xmath114 line and one @xmath76 line ( with any number of interactions ) , since additional lines are not allowed as discussed above . moreover , because the interaction is instantaneous , there is no possibility of crossing of interactions when the diagram is drawn in time representation . finally our lines are not allowed to go backward in time since this would correspond to the creation of a particle - hole pair , which is again not allowed in our case where we have a negative chemical potential at @xmath14 ( by contrast , for @xmath89 , such processes could naturally occur ) . in summary the only possible diagrams are those of repeated interactions between the @xmath114 and the @xmath115 atom . this corresponds merely to the propagation of a normal dimer . however these diagrams are already generated by the iteration of the term ( [ bcs ] ) when @xmath116 is written as @xmath117 from eq.([eqdysond ] ) at lowest order , and they should not be double - counted . hence there is no term of order @xmath16 in this set , and our expansion starts with terms containing @xmath118 . the analysis is now somewhat similar to the one made in the preceding subsection [ normself ] . to obtain the above third order term in the equation for @xmath17 , we have to write , together with the factor @xmath118 , all the normal state diagrams which have , in addition to the two entering lines ( @xmath46 ) and ( @xmath119 , another couple of entering lines coming from @xmath120 . moreover , we have two couples of outgoing lines , going into @xmath65 and @xmath121 . just as in the preceding subsection , we have a no first interaction restriction for all these couples of lines , including the ( @xmath46 ) and ( @xmath119 ones . as discussed above , in addition to these ingoing and outgoing ones with their continuations , no other lines can appear in these diagrams since they form loops , which are forbidden since we are at @xmath14 and @xmath22 . we find that such normal state diagrams have already been essentially encountered in ref.@xcite , where their sum has been called @xmath122 . here @xmath123 and @xmath124 are for the entering fermionic lines ( corresponding to @xmath18 and @xmath125 in our case ) , the total four - vector for the ingoing and outgoing lines being @xmath126 . finally there is , in the definition of @xmath127 , one entering @xmath128 dimer , while there are two outgoing dimers @xmath129 and @xmath130 . just as in the preceding section , we should take into account that , in the general case , we have the weight @xmath118 which depends on the four - vectors of the atom propagators making up the dimers , while in the definition of @xmath127 the summation over these variables is already performed , with only their sums @xmath128 , @xmath129 and @xmath130 being fixed . this problem could nevertheless be circumvented and an expression for the normal part obtained in terms of @xmath127 , in a way analogous to appendix [ appt3 ] . however , just as in subsection [ normself ] , this is not necessary . indeed from the lowest order term @xmath131 given by eq.([bcs ] ) , we see that @xmath17 does not depend at lowest order on the frequency variable @xmath132 . moreover , since we deal with a bare interaction potential @xmath133 which has a very short range , its fourier transform @xmath110 is a constant , except for very large wave vectors . but , as we will see , these wave vectors will not come into play because all the integrals we deal with converge at a much shorter wave vector . hence we find that , at lowest order , @xmath17 turns out to be independent of @xmath18 , just as in standard bcs theory . now , when we want to calculate the third order term , we may insert in it the expression of @xmath17 to lowest order , which is just a constant which we denote again as @xmath16 . accordingly the above problem disappears and the normal part of our diagrams can be expressed directly in terms of @xmath122 . nevertheless we have to take into account , just as in subsection [ normself ] , that some of the diagrams appearing in @xmath134 are actually not irreducible , and should not be included in our expression for @xmath17 . hence we have to subtract them out of @xmath135 . we denote @xmath136 what remains of @xmath127 after this subtraction . this will be taken care of just below . gathering our results , we end up with the following ( self - consistent ) equation : @xmath137 the factor 1/2 in front of @xmath136 is a general topological factor ( it is present even if we do not take @xmath16 as constant ) . indeed exchanging @xmath65 and @xmath121 corresponds to a mere change of variable and not to a different diagram . on the other hand , by making use of @xmath138 , any given such diagram would appear twice ( even if @xmath127 is actually unchanged when we exchange the bosonic variables of the two outgoing dimers , which amounts to change @xmath70 into @xmath139 ) . hence the factor 1/2 is required to avoid this double counting . we note that clearly @xmath17 depends indeed on @xmath18 in general , since this is already explicitely the case in eq.([eqdelta ] ) where the third order term depends on @xmath18 through @xmath140 . let us now be specific about the difference between @xmath127 and @xmath141 , due to the reducible diagrams contained in @xmath135 . one can obtain them by looking at the diagrammatic expansion @xcite of @xmath127 . however it is easier to notice , as indicated above , that they appear automatically explicitely from eq.([eqdysonc],[eqdysond ] ) , when their solution are expanded in order to obtain the complete perturbative series expansion of @xmath33 and @xmath31 in powers of @xmath142 and @xmath16 , because this expansion provides precisely all the reducible contributions in terms of the irreducible self - energies @xmath142 and @xmath16 . when we expand the solution for @xmath31 : @xmath143[g^{-1}_0(-p)-\sigma ( -p)]+\delta ( p ) \delta^ { * } ( p)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] to third order , we find : @xmath144g_0(-p)\end{aligned}\ ] ] where for consistency we have to take only the second order contribution @xmath63 ( given by eq.([eqsigmn2 ] ) ) to @xmath81 . the third order terms in the bracket are clearly the reducible contributions to @xmath145 , as it can be seen directly . they are displayed diagrammatically in fig.[figxxxx ] . in particular the last term of the bracket comes from the born term of @xmath146 . hence we have explicitely : @xmath147\end{aligned}\ ] ] . in the first two terms @xmath148 is obtained from @xmath73 by excluding the born term , since it is taken into account explicitely by the third term.,width=377 ] however it is now more convenient to work with @xmath127 rather than @xmath141 . hence we add to both members of eq.([eqdelta ] ) the reducible contributions . after multiplication by @xmath149 and taking into account eq.([eqf3 ] ) , we end up with : @xmath150 finally we obtain a closed equation by eliminating @xmath31 in favor of @xmath17 through eq.([eqdelta ] ) , or more simply through the definition eq.([bcs ] ) . multiplying eq.([eqf ] ) by @xmath151 and summing over @xmath18 we find : @xmath152 if we had only the first term in the right - hand side , we would merely have the linearized bcs gap equation . accordingly we proceed in the standard way @xcite to eliminate the bare potential in favor of the scattering amplitude . this is more easily understood by proceeding in a formal way . introducing the operator @xmath153 , with matrix elements @xmath154 , and the diagonal operator @xmath155 with matrix elements @xmath156 , the @xmath157-matrix for two fermions ( in the center of mass frame ) in vacuum satisfies @xmath158 , where the operator product implies naturally the summation on the intermediate variables with @xmath159 . this can just be written @xmath160 . if we note @xmath161 the second term in the right - hand side of eq.([eqf ] ) , we can rewrite eq.([eqgap1 ] ) as @xmath162 , or @xmath163 . inserting the above value of @xmath164 , this leads to @xmath165 , or @xmath166 . this is explicitely : @xmath167 where @xmath168 is the energy at which the @xmath157-matrix is calculated . in the present case , since @xmath169^{-1}$ ] , the total energy for the two fermions is @xmath170 ( @xmath19 for each fermion ) , as it can be seen directly by integrating the first term of eq.([eqgap1 ] ) over @xmath132 . in standard scattering theory the scattering amplitude @xmath171 at energy @xmath172 ( the reduced mass is @xmath173 ) is obtained from the evaluation of the @xmath157-matrix `` on the shell '' , i.e. taking @xmath174 with @xmath175 . in the present case we deal with a potential with a short range of order @xmath176 . this implies that @xmath177 and @xmath178 have to vary on a typical scale @xmath179 in order to have a significant variation of @xmath174 . since in the case of ultracold atoms we are dealing with much smaller wavevectors , and we may replace @xmath174 by @xmath180 . hence the scattering amplitude is merely given by @xmath181 . on the other hand , in this same regime , the scattering amplitude is given by its s - wave component @xmath182^{-1}$ ] . this gives @xmath183^{-1}$ ] . now we evaluate eq.([eqgap2 ] ) for @xmath184 small compared to @xmath179 . we see that in this range @xmath185 is essentially a constant , which we call simply @xmath186 . on the other hand @xmath161 is a rapidly decreasing function @xcite of @xmath187 , on a typical scale @xmath188 . hence we may replace in eq.([eqgap2 ] ) @xmath189 by @xmath190 , which can be expressed in terms of the scattering amplitude . this leads explicitely to : @xmath191\,\delta_1=\frac{1}{2 } \,\delta\ , |\delta |^2 \sum_{p}g_0(p)g_0(-p ) \phi ( p ,- p;0 , 0)\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally we take into account the fact that the sum over @xmath18 appearing in the right - hand side of eq.([eqgap3 ] ) is directly related to the dimer - dimer scattering amplitude @xmath192 in vacuum @xcite by : @xmath193 whereas : @xmath194 we note that , in eq.([eqt4 ] ) , we end up with @xmath192 being evaluated at a dimer energy @xmath195 , while the dimer - dimer scattering in eq.([eqam ] ) is related to @xmath192 evaluated at the binding energy @xmath196 . however at this stage the small difference between @xmath195 and @xmath197 is unimportant in @xmath192 , since it appears in the corrective term which is on the right - hand side of eq.([eqgap3 ] ) . in this term we may also , within the same level of accuracy , use @xmath198 . this leads finally to : @xmath199 when we substitute in this expression the relation @xmath200 found in section [ deltexp ] a , we obtain at the same level of accuracy : @xmath201 which is the standard mean field correction to the chemical potential , with the proper dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath1 . since the lhy terms come physically from the low energy collective mode , we need first to derive the expression for the collective mode propagator , as well as its anomalous counterpart . these propagators can be seen as the extension to the superfluid state of the dimer propagator in the normal state . for the normal component of this propagator , this is just the full vertex with two entering and two outgoing fermion lines , the two fermions having opposite spins . in the normal state , in the dilute limit , this vertex is just the single dimer propagator @xmath202 already used in ref.@xcite . it depends only on the total momentum @xmath203 and the total energy @xmath204 of the two fermions . in contrast with the above reference we work in the grand canonical ensemble and the energies are taken with respect to the chemical potential @xmath19 of single fermions . hence for all the energies @xmath205 used in ref.@xcite , we have to make the substitution @xmath206 . for the single dimer propagator we have to make @xmath207 . however we keep for simplicity the same notation as in ref.@xcite for the various quantities after having made this substitution . also for coherence , and in contrast with the preceding sections , we work in the present section with real frequencies , rather than with matsubara frequencies . this is also more natural physically since we are interested in particular in the ( real ) frequency of the collective mode . making use of the quadrivector notation @xmath208 we have thus , for this single dimer propagator in the dilute limit : @xmath209 where @xmath210 is the dimer binding energy , and we have made explicit the fact that @xmath211 . note that physically this propagator describes the bound state of the two fermions , through its pole at @xmath212 , as well as the continuum of scattering states where the dimer is broken , through the continuum in the spectral function starting at @xmath213 . in the superfluid we want to obtain the correction to this normal state result to lowest order in @xmath214 . more precisely we want to correct what corresponds to the self - energy if we had a single particle propagator . in the present case this is the irreducible vertex in the particle - particle channel , which by definition can not be separated in two disconnected parts by cutting two fermion propagators . more precisely , since the bare interaction between fermions is already taken into account in @xmath108 , this is the part of this irreducible vertex beyond the bare interaction we are interested in . this part @xmath215 of the irreducible vertex depends on the quadrivectors @xmath123 and @xmath124 of the entering particles , as well as on those @xmath216 and @xmath217 of the outgoing particles . assuming for the moment quite generally that the full vertex @xmath218 depends also on these four quadrivectors , we can write a bethe - salpeter equation , which is shown diagrammatically in fig . [ figgammaab]a : @xmath219 @xmath220 where @xmath221 . we have made explicit the fact that the normal state dimer propagator @xmath108 depends only on the sum @xmath222 of the incoming and outgoing fermions quadrivectors . in eq.([betsal ] ) the first sum is completely analogous to what should be written in the normal state . however we had also to write the second sum , which describes the anomalous processes where a dimer can be annihilated into the condensate or can be created from the condensate . this leads to introduce , in correspondance with the first sum , an anomalous irreducible vertex @xmath223 where four fermions are entering ( annihilated into the condensate ) and none is going out . correspondingly we need to introduce an anomalous full vertex @xmath224 with only outgoing fermion lines . naturally in order to close our set of equations we have to write for this vertex the corresponding bethe - salpeter equation , which is shown diagrammatically in fig . [ figgammaab]b , the major difference with the preceding one being that there is no normal state term : @xmath225 @xmath226 where we have introduced the irreducible vertex @xmath227 where there are only outgoing fermions , physically created from the condensate . now it is explicit in eq.([betsal ] ) that @xmath218 depends only on @xmath228 . by time reversal symmetry it depends also only on @xmath229 , this last equality resulting from momentum - energy conservation . hence , just as @xmath108 , it depends only on the total momentum and energy @xmath71 , and we merely denote this function as @xmath230 . similarly @xmath231 depends only on @xmath232 and we call it merely @xmath233 . in this way eq.([betsal ] ) becomes simply : @xmath234 and similarly : @xmath235 where we have introduced : @xmath236 these equations are naturally quite similar to the ones we had for the single fermion green s function . their solutions are : @xmath237 \left[t_2^{-1}(-p)-\gamma_{\mathrm irr}(-p)\right ] -\gamma^a_{\mathrm irr}(p){\bar \gamma}^a_{\mathrm irr}(-p)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath238 \left[t_2^{-1}(-p)-\gamma_{\mathrm irr}(-p)\right ] -\gamma^a_{\mathrm irr}(p){\bar \gamma}^a_{\mathrm irr}(-p)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] as it could be expected physically , these equations are formally identical to those obtained for pure bosons @xcite . in the same spirit we note , for later use , that we could also introduce an anomalous full vertex @xmath239 with only ingoing fermion lines . it is easily shown , by writing the equivalent of eq.([betsalp ] ) with this vertex , to be related to the preceding ones by @xmath240 . this gives : @xmath241 \left[t_2^{-1}(-p)-\gamma_{\mathrm irr}(-p)\right ] -\gamma^a_{\mathrm irr}(p){\bar \gamma}^a_{\mathrm irr}(-p)}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we have now to find the expressions of @xmath242 , @xmath243 and @xmath227 within our expansion in powers of @xmath16 . since @xmath16 corresponds to diagrams with two ingoing fermions and @xmath64 to two outgoing fermions , particle conservation implies that the expansions start at second order with @xmath242 proportional to @xmath244 , @xmath243 proportional to @xmath91 and @xmath227 proportional to @xmath245 . since it can be seen that it is not required to go to higher order , the expressions of our irreducible vertices will be given by these second order expressions . since we have written explicitely the various factors @xmath16 and @xmath246 , the coefficients in the expressions of @xmath242,@xmath243 and @xmath227 correspond to diagrams containing only normal state propagators . for @xmath242 ( see fig . [ figxxabc]a ) , we have to write the expression for all the normal state diagrams with one ingoing dimer propagator and one outgoing dimer ( from the very definition of @xmath242 ) . moreover there are in addition two lines ingoing from @xmath64 and two lines outgoing to @xmath16 . these last two couples of lines have to be treated as dimer lines , which means that they are not allowed to interact immediately in the normal state diagrams we are drawing , because such interactions are already taken into account in @xmath16 and @xmath247 , and allowing them would amount to double counting . in summary we have to write all possible normal state diagrams with two ingoing dimer lines and two outgoing dimer lines ( these diagrams are automatically irreducible in the sense of the definition of @xmath242 , that is with respect to a single dimer propagator , since the four ingoing normal state lines can not disappear ) . this is depicted diagrammatically in fig . [ figxxabc]a . but this set of diagrams is just by definition the normal state dimer - dimer scattering vertex @xmath192 introduced in @xcite . more precisely , since the total momentum - energy linked to @xmath16 and @xmath247 is zero and the total momentum - energy of the ingoing lines is @xmath71 , this vertex is @xmath248 with the notations of ref.@xcite which gives for @xmath242 the explicit expression : @xmath249 with completely analogous arguments for @xmath243 , we obtain : @xmath250 and similarly : @xmath251 corresponding to the diagrams found in fig . [ figxxabc]b and fig . [ figxxabc]c . in eq.([gammirra ] ) and ( [ gammirrba ] ) we had to put a 1/2 topological factor corresponding to the fact that , for example , exchanging the two factors @xmath16 in eq.([gammirra ] ) ( that is precisely the set of diagrams they correspond to ) does not produce a different diagram , whereas this diagram would appear twice if we had just written @xmath252 . . a ) normal irreducible vertex @xmath253 . b ) and c ) anomalous irreducible vertices @xmath254 and @xmath255.,width=453 ] finally it is worth pointing out that @xmath192 satisfies @xmath256 . this is physically obvious since it corresponds to state that exchanging the arguments of the two ingoing dimer lines does not change the value of the vertex , since we exchange two bosons . but this property can also be proved directly from the integral equation @xcite satisfied by @xmath192 . similarly we have @xmath257 . let us consider now more specifically the collective mode dispersion relation . it is given by the pole of the collective mode propagator , that is : @xmath258 \left[t_2^{-1}(-p)-\gamma_{\mathrm irr}(-p)\right ] -\gamma^a_{\mathrm irr}(p){\bar \gamma}^a_{\mathrm irr}(-p)}=0\end{aligned}\ ] ] naturally we have first to check that for zero wave vector @xmath259 , the frequency @xmath260 is zero , that is @xmath261 is solution of this dispersion relation . for this case we have from eq . ( [ 2vertex ] ) for the bare dimer propagator : @xmath262 on the other hand we have @xmath263 where the last equality comes from ref.@xcite , and we have used the fact that , in @xmath264 , we may , at the order we are working , replace @xmath265 by its zeroth order value , namely @xmath266 ( we recall that we have to shift all the frequencies of ref.@xcite by @xmath195 ) . since we have already found that @xmath267 , we can easily check that eq.([moddisp ] ) is indeed satisfied in this case . now , as we will see , we are more specifically interested in the collective mode dispersion relation for wave vectors @xmath268 and frequencies @xmath269 . since @xmath270 and @xmath271 are of the same order of magnitude , we can expand the bare dimer propagator to first order as : @xmath272 on the other hand the typical scale of variation of @xmath192 on its arguments is @xmath188 for the wave vectors and @xmath270 for the energies , since we deal with a normal state quantity and there are accordingly no other scales in the corresponding problem . hence , for the wave vectors and frequencies we are considering , we can still take : @xmath273 on the other hand the above result at @xmath261 implies also that we have @xmath274 , and eq . ( [ moddisp ] ) for the collective mode frequency @xmath275 can be rewritten as : @xmath276 where we have set @xmath277 and in the last step we have used the lowest order expressions for @xmath278 and @xmath214 to calculate this quantity . naturally eq.([bog ] ) is just the bogoliubov dispersion relation , with the proper scattering dimer - dimer scattering length . as we have already indicated in the introduction , the lhy term arises from the collective mode contributions to the self - energies . if we were to continue naturally our above procedure and go to next order in @xmath16 , i.e. to order @xmath279 for example in the calculation of the normal self - energy , we would find singular results ( as it can be checked by proceeding to such a formal expansion in the explicit calculations performed below ) . this is due to the fact that the collective mode is gapless , and the lack of gap in the excitation spectrum leads to a singularity in the perturbative expansion . hence , instead of the next order terms , we include the whole contribution coming from the collective mode . avoiding in this way to proceed immediately to a @xmath16 expansion is equivalent to a series resummation , which allows to take care of singularities . writing the collective mode contributions to the self - energy is formally easy , when one notices for example the analogy of the normal part of the collective mode propagator with the product of @xmath64 and @xmath16 . indeed the term @xmath64 acts as a source of fermions in our diagrams , coming physically out of the condensate , while @xmath16 acts as a sink of fermions going into the condensate . these source and sink related to the condensate are required since , at @xmath280 , no fermions are present except coming from the superfluid . however when we allow to insert the normal part of a collective mode propagator , the starting part of the propagator acts as a sink for the rest of the diagram while the end part acts as a source . hence we have just to substitute @xmath244 by the normal part of a collective mode propagator . we will proceed in a similar way for the anomalous parts . naturally we will have to take care that the self - energy contributions already calculated above are not counted twice , by removing the corresponding terms . hence the collective mode contribution @xmath281 to the normal self - energy is obtained by replacing , in our lowest order expression , the product @xmath244 by the collective mode propagator , more specifically its diagonal component @xmath282 given by eq.([gamn ] ) , as depicted diagrammatically in fig.[figxab ] . we have naturally to sum over the variable @xmath71 of the collective mode . corresponding to eq.([eqsigmn2 ] ) , this leads to : @xmath283 . the diagonal component @xmath282 of the collective mode propagator is depicted by the heavy line , width=226 ] in principle this expression is improper because it contains , when we perform its expansion in powers of @xmath214 , contributions of zeroth and first order in @xmath214 which have already been taken explicitely into account in our above expansion . however in the present case these two contributions are zero . for the zeroth order term , this is fairly obvious physically since it corresponds to a normal state diagram with a normal state dimer propagator , and at @xmath14 no dimers are present which makes all diagrams of this kind equal to zero . mathematically this would happen because , in this diagram , the presence of a normal state dimer would necessarily imply , since there is no down - spin entering line , the presence of a down - spin loop ( if we calculate the up - spin self - energy ) which can not be present as explained in appendix [ appnoloop ] . in the collective mode contribution to the normal self - energy eq.([eqsigmod ] ) depicted in fig.[figxab],width=226 ] the conclusion is the same for the first order term , but the argument is slightly more complicated . the factor of @xmath214 in this term is @xmath284 ^ 2t_4(p/2,p/2;p/2)$ ] , which is a normal state diagram ( see fig.[figaaaa ] ) . it is actually a part of the diagrams belonging to @xmath102 since it has one entering fermion line and one entering dimer line , with the same for the outgoing lines . however we have seen , as it is detailed in appendix [ appt3anal ] , that only the born term in @xmath73 gives a non zero contribution to the particle number . on the other hand the term @xmath284 ^ 2t_4(p/2,p/2;p/2)$ ] does obviously not contain the born term of @xmath73 since this last one reduces to a simple propagator , whereas the presence of the factor @xmath108 implies at least two lines , with interaction between them . actually one can see more precisely that our term is equal to zero , since it contains necessarily propagators going backward in time ( see appendix [ appnoloop ] and [ appt3anal ] ) . taking the born contribution for @xmath73 and @xmath192 in @xmath284 ^ 2t_4(p/2,p/2;p/2)$ ] gives a good example of this . finally , after these considerations , we see that we can still use eq.([eqsigmod ] ) for @xmath285 . the conclusion will be different for the mode contribution to the anomalous self - energy discussed below . now when we look for the contribution @xmath286 to the density corresponding to eq.([eqsigmod ] ) , we have to replace @xmath33 in eq.([eqdefn ] ) by @xmath287 , just as it is done below eq.([eqdefn ] ) . quite similarly it will be enough to replace here @xmath33 by @xmath40 to obtain the lowest order contribution of the collective mode we are interested in . this gives : @xmath288 ^ 2= \sum_{p , p}\,t_3(p , p;p+p ) \,\gamma(p)\left[g_0(p)\right]^2\end{aligned}\ ] ] where again @xmath289 and @xmath290 . now the argument runs just as below eq.([eqdefn1 ] ) . we integrate first on the frequency variable @xmath96 of the quadrivector @xmath18 . as shown in appendix [ appt3anal ] , it turns out that , except for the born contribution , @xmath291 is analytical in the upper complex half - plane of the variable @xmath96 . since @xmath292 ^ 2=[i\nu -\xi_{\bf p } ] ^{-2}$ ] is also analytical in this half - plane , one obtains by closing the integration contour at infinity in this half - plane that only the born part @xmath293 of @xmath291 contributes to the result . hence for the integration over @xmath96 , we have just to calculate : @xmath294^{2}}\,\frac{1}{i\omega - i\nu- |\mu |-\epsilon _ { { \bf p}-{\bf p}}}= -\frac{1}{[i\omega -2|\mu |-\epsilon _ { \bf p}-\epsilon _ { { \bf p}-{\bf p } } ] ^{2}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and we are left with : @xmath295^{2}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the factor of @xmath282 is analytical in the upper complex half - plane of @xmath260 ( which corresponds to the negative frequency half - plane when we go back to the standard frequency language ) . hence by closing the @xmath204 contour in this half - plane , we are left to consider the singularities of @xmath282 . physically they correspond to the two - fermions excitations of the system , that is the collective mode and the broken molecule excited states . in the standard frequency language , the corresponding singularities are on the real frequency axis ( the imaginary axis for @xmath204 ) , on the negative as well as on the positive side . let us first consider the low frequency singularities . for a fixed value of @xmath296 , we have just as singularity a single pole corresponding to the collective mode frequency . let us call @xmath275 the positive solution of eq.([bog ] ) . our pole is located at @xmath297 . in eq.([gamn ] ) , which gives @xmath282 , for low frequency and wavevector , the denominator becomes @xmath298 , while from eq.([2vertex1 ] ) the numerator is @xmath299 $ ] . after going to imaginary frequency @xmath300 , this gives in @xmath282 , for the pole at @xmath301 , a residue : @xmath302\end{aligned}\ ] ] on the other hand , for small @xmath204 and @xmath296 , the @xmath187 integration in eq.([eqnmoda ] ) reduces to : @xmath303^{2}}=\frac{m^{3/2}}{8\pi \sqrt{2 |\mu |}}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this leads to : @xmath304\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the last step we have made the change of variables @xmath305 . the numerical integral is @xmath306 and our final result is : @xmath307 where in the last equality we have made use of the lowest order result for @xmath214 , given by eq.([eqdefn3 ] ) . naturally , once we have taken care of @xmath73 , we are essentially back to the elementary boson theory @xcite and one recognizes in eq.([ncmfin ] ) the standard `` depletion of the condensate '' for the dilute bose gas , with @xmath308 being its coherence length . we have first considered the contribution of the low frequency singularities . we have now to finish up by showing that the higher frequency ones give a negligible contribution . first we see that , in eq.([eqnmoda ] ) , the denominator plays in this respect an unimportant role , since its modulus is larger than @xmath309 . hence to have an upper bound for the contributions we are investigating , we can replace this denominator by this lower bound , which gives after integration over @xmath187 an unimportant factor @xmath310 . hence we are again left with the evaluation of @xmath311 . it is now more convenient to go back to real frequencies ( equivalent to the change of variables @xmath312 ) . the integration is now over the imaginary @xmath313 axis and is closed in the negative @xmath313 half - plane . the contour can be deformed to merely enclose the negative @xmath313 axis , and corresponding to the singularities on this axis , @xmath314 has a jump across this axis . hence we have : @xmath315 now , from eq.([gamn ] ) , @xmath316 contains a first term @xmath317 which has all its singularities on the real positive @xmath313 axis , corresponding to the continuous spectrum of the broken dimer ( for @xmath108 ) and of the broken pair of dimers ( for @xmath318 ) . hence it is real on the negative @xmath313 axis and does not contribute to @xmath319 in eq.([eqcorr1 ] ) . from eq.([gamn ] ) the second term of @xmath320 is @xmath321 , which is directly proportional to @xmath322 from the product @xmath323 . accordingly we have proved basically our point since our result , being proportional to @xmath324 , is indeed negligible compared to the result eq.([ncmfin ] ) , which is proportional to @xmath2 . actually , to complete our proof , we have to be more careful and evaluate the coefficient of @xmath322 . this is quite obvious since eq.([ncmfin ] ) is in fact a contribution contained in eq.([eqcorr1 ] ) ( we have made no approximation to reach eq.([eqcorr1 ] ) ) . this detailed analysis is performed in appendix [ normselfa ] . we will now proceed in a similar way to obtain the mode contribution @xmath325 to the anomalous self - energy @xmath326 . this contribution is obtained by replacing , in the diagrams which lead to the second term of eq.([eqdelta ] ) , any second order product @xmath244 , @xmath327 or @xmath328 , by the corresponding collective mode propagator . accordingly we replace specifically @xmath244 by the diagonal component @xmath282 , and @xmath327 by the off - diagonal one @xmath329 . this is depicted diagrammatically in fig.[figxabcd ] . just as in eq.([eqdelta ] ) this last term comes with a topological factor @xmath330 to avoid double counting . on the other hand , since the two dimer outgoing lines in the first term play inequivalent roles , such a topological factor does not apply to this first term . it is worth noticing that , since the collective mode propagator depends only on the total momentum - energy four - vector , we do not meet at this stage the problems linked to the @xmath177-dependence of @xmath326 , discussed in appendix [ appt3 ] . . the diagonal component @xmath282 of the collective mode propagator is depicted by the heavy line with a single arrow and the off - diagonal one @xmath329 by the heavy line with two arrows . for the two diagrams the slash in the heavy lines means that the terms which are first order in @xmath214 have been removed.,width=377 ] just as in section [ anomself ] , we should not include the terms of @xmath122 leading to reducible contributions to the self - energy . these are easily obtained from the diagrams displayed in fig.[figxxxx ] by making the above substitution of @xmath244 by @xmath282 . this implies in the same way the replacement of @xmath122 by @xmath331 . however , as in section [ anomself ] , it is more convenient to add these reducible terms to both members of the equation for @xmath16 . in the left - hand side one obtains @xmath332^{-1}f(p)[g_0(-p)]^{-1}$ ] , while in the right - hand side one recovers @xmath127 instead of @xmath141 . finally we restrict ourselves to the contribution of the low frequency collective mode , the higher frequency contributions being expected to be of order @xmath333 and thus negligible , just as in the preceding section [ modnormal ] . accordingly the variable @xmath71 in @xmath282 and @xmath329 is small . this implies that @xmath334 , which comes as a factor of @xmath282 , can be replaced by @xmath335 at the order we are working . similarly @xmath336 , which comes as a factor of @xmath329 , can also be replaced by @xmath335 . after multiplication by @xmath149 this leads to the equation : @xmath337\end{aligned}\ ] ] which comes in place of eq.([eqf3 ] ) . in the preceding section [ modnormal ] we have already calculated @xmath338 at the level of eq.([eqintx ] ) and found @xmath339 , where @xmath340 is defined by eq.([ncmfin ] ) . in principle the calculation of @xmath341 follows the same line as the one of @xmath338 . one performs first the frequency integration by noticing that , for fixed @xmath296 , @xmath329 has a pole at @xmath297 . the corresponding residue @xmath342 is obtained from the residue @xmath343 for @xmath282 by comparing eq.([gama ] ) with eq.([gamn ] ) . one has to multiply @xmath343 by @xmath344 $ ] , evaluated at the pole , to obtain @xmath342 . this gives merely : @xmath345 now if we proceed as in eq.([eqintx ] ) we come to an integral with an ultraviolet divergence , which would invalidate our procedure . the reason for this problem is that we have not yet consistently removed in our calculation the terms of order zero and one in @xmath214 , as we have done precedingly . that we should do it was already appearent in eq.([eqfapp ] ) by the notation @xmath346 instead of @xmath347 ( which implies also a multiplication by @xmath348 ) . we recall that these terms have to be subtracted out because they have already been taken into account in our preceding lowest order calculation . however in the above preceding cases , it turned out that these terms were equal to zero , which made the subtraction transparent . here this is not the case . the most efficient way to perform this subtraction is to note that , from eq.([gamabar ] ) , @xmath329 contains already an explicit factor @xmath254 in the numerator , proportional to @xmath214 , which gives directly the factor @xmath349 in eq.([barza ] ) . hence the term of order @xmath214 to be subtracted is merely obtained by taking the other factors to order zero in @xmath214 , that is by replacing @xmath275 in eq.([barza ] ) by its zeroth order expression @xmath350 . actually this argument is a bit too fast . it misses the fact that we may at the same time evaluate @xmath351 in eq.([eqfapp ] ) with the chemical potential taken as @xmath352 , even for the @xmath353 term , as we had done in eq.([eqt4 ] ) . hence this whole step is taken up in more details in appendix [ muzero ] . we find in this way : @xmath354\end{aligned}\ ] ] making again the change of variables @xmath305 , this gives : @xmath355=\frac{32}{\pi } \mu _ b^{3/2}|\mu |^{1/2 } = \frac{24\pi \sqrt{2 |\mu |}}{m^{-3/2}}\,n_{cm}=3\sum_{p}{\gamma}(p)\end{aligned}\ ] ] hence the last bracket in eq.([eqfapp ] ) can be written @xmath356 . the rest of the argument proceeds just as in section [ anomself ] , provided @xmath353 is replaced by the above bracket . this leads to the replacement of eq.([mean ] ) by @xmath357\end{aligned}\ ] ] we may eliminate @xmath214 by making use of the number equation , which reads now from eq.([eqdefn2 ] ) : @xmath358 this gives : @xmath359=\pi a\ , a_m\left[n+4n_{cm}\right]\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the last equality our replacement of @xmath360 by @xmath361 introduces only errors of order @xmath3 in the equation of state . to the same order this leads us to : @xmath362\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the last term we may replace @xmath286 by its expression eq.([ncmfin ] ) @xmath363 . this gives the familiar lee - huang - yang result for the chemical potential of a dimer , taking its binding energy as reference : @xmath364\end{aligned}\ ] ] in this paper we have presented a general theoretical framework to deal with fermionic superfluidity on the bec side of the bec - bcs crossover . our approach involves no approximation in principle , but in order to obtain explicit results we have to proceed to an expansion in powers ot the anomalous self - energy , which is basicallly equivalent to an expansion in powers of the gas parameter @xmath365 . we have applied our method to the @xmath14 thermodynamics and calculated the first terms in the expansion of the chemical potential in powers of the density . we have in this way shown explicitely that the mean - field contribution is indeed given by the standard expression in terms of the dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath1 . we have then proved that the lee - huang - yang contribution to the chemical potential retains also its standard expression from elementary boson superfluid theory provided @xmath1 is used in its expression . departures from elementary boson theory appear at the order @xmath3 . naturally our approach can be used to obtain other physical quantities and extended for example to finite temperature and dynamical properties . this will be considered elsewhere . `` laboratoire de physique statistique de lecole normale suprieure '' is `` associ au centre national de la recherche scientifique et aux universits pierre et marie curie - paris 6 et paris 7 '' . if we note @xmath367 the sum of all normal diagrams , with one single atom @xmath18 line going in and out , two entering atom lines @xmath368 ) and @xmath369 ) corresponding to an ingoing dimer , and two outgoing atom lines @xmath370 ) and @xmath371 ) corresponding to an outgoing dimer , we have : @xmath372 in order to obtain an expression for @xmath367 , one can find in the spirit of ref.@xcite integral equations for this quantity , and then identify in them a quantity which is precisely @xmath68 . another slightly more direct way is to separate , in @xmath373 , all the diagrams where 0 or 1 dimer lines are present , right at the beginning or right at the end of @xmath374 . we do not enter into the details but only give the result , on which the above mentionned separation is clear : @xmath375 ^ 2\,g(p')\,t_2(p - p')\,\delta_{p',p '' } \nonumber \\ + g(p')g(-p ' ) g(p'')g(-p'')t_2(p - p')t_2(p - p'')t_3(p',p'';p)\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath376 is the kronecker symbol , and @xmath377 is the normal state dimer propagator . one can check , by making use of eq . ( [ eq2appt3 ] ) and of the integral equation @xcite satisfied by @xmath73 , that eq . ( [ eq1appt3 ] ) reduces to eq . ( [ eqsigmn2 ] ) when @xmath17 does not depend on @xmath18 . since we are at @xmath14 with a negative chemical potential , there is no fermi sea and no possibility of fermionic holes . when we consider the propagation of a fermionic atom , it has to be created before being destroyed . this corresponds to the fact that the free fermion propagator is retarded . in ( imaginary ) time and wavevector representation we have for the free atom green s function : @xmath378 where @xmath379 is the heaviside function . we consider now the contribution coming from any loop in a diagram . for clarity we do not write the wave vectors , which do not play any role in the argument . the loop starts for example at a vertex with time @xmath380 , with successive interactions at times @xmath381 . this implies in the term corresponding to this diagram the presence of the product @xmath382 . in order to have each term being non zero in this product of retarded green s function , we need @xmath383 , which is impossible to satisfy . hence one of the green s function in this product will necessarily be zero , and the contribution of any diagram with a loop will also be zero . note that the argument applies also if there is a single green s function in the loop @xcite . if we were to carry out calculations in frequency , rather than time , representation the corresponding free atom green s function is analytical in the upper complex half - plane , and the above result would appear through integration over frequencies with contours closed in the upper complex half - plane . we have considered for consistency the imaginary time formalism . naturally exactly the same arguments apply if we consider the real time representation . we give first an explicit proof of the analytical property of @xmath73 indicated in the text . we start from the integral equation satisfied by @xmath73 with at first essentially the notations of ref.@xcite : @xmath385 we follow ref.@xcite and perform the frequency integration in the second term , making use of the fact that the only singularity in the lower half complex plane comes from @xmath386 and is located at @xmath387 . we write then explicitely the resulting equation for @xmath388 , @xmath389 , while @xmath390 is replaced by @xmath391 , keeping in mind that the frequencies @xmath69 and @xmath70 have to be shifted by @xmath19 ( and @xmath391 by @xmath392 ) and that we work now with imaginary frequencies . this gives : @xmath393 @xmath394 when we write this equation for @xmath395 , we see that the first term , which is the born contribution , has a pole in the upper complex half - plane , at @xmath396 . on the other hand , in the integral , the first factor does not depend on frequency @xmath313 . the singularities coming from the dimer term will be in the lower complex half - plane with @xmath397 ( since we will have @xmath398 ) . regarding the @xmath399 term , if we write eq . ( [ 3vertex1 ] ) for the variable @xmath400 evaluated on the shell , i.e. @xmath401 , we obtain an integral equation for @xmath399 . in this equation the born term does not depend on frequency . the first term in the integral has its poles satisfying @xmath402 and the dimer term has again its singularities in the lower complex half - plane . hence by a recursive argument ( or equivalently by iteration of the equation ) , we conclude that the singularities of @xmath403 are also in the lower complex half - plane . this shows that indeed , except for the born contribution , @xmath384 is analytical in the upper complex half - plane of the frequency variable @xmath313 . involved in the calculation of the particle number @xmath0 . we use the standard representation where the propagator starts at the destruction time and ends at the creation time . b ) born term in the diagrammatic expansion of the propagator represented in a ) . c ) example of a diagram which gives a zero contribution due to the presence of a loop.,width=566 ] naturally we do not expect such a result to come by chance and we discuss now its physical origin . it is more easily seen in real time , rather than frequency , representation . the particle number eq.([eqdefn ] ) is merely given by : @xmath404 with @xmath405 . the average corresponds to a full propagator @xmath406 in time representation , where the particle is created at time @xmath407 , later than the time @xmath408 at which it is destroyed . in standard @xcite diagrammatic representation ( see fig.[figappc ] a ) ) , with time going from left to right and the propagator starting at the destruction time and ending at the creation time @xcite , we have to draw diagrams where the @xmath114 particle propagator starts from @xmath409 and goes globally forward ( that is to the right in fig.[figappc ] ) in time , ending up at @xmath407 . however when we write the perturbation expansion of this propagator , we have to use free particle propagators @xmath87 which are retarded and go only forward in time ( i.e. the arrows go to the left in fig.[figappc ] when we use the standard green s function representation @xcite ) . hence the zeroth order in our perturbation expansion is obviously zero . when we go to second order , corresponding to eq.([eqdefn1 ] ) , we can use @xmath64 which creates , at some given time , a pair of particles @xmath410 ( this process is instantaneous in time because , at lowest order , @xmath16 does not depend on frequency ) . similarly @xmath16 annihilates a pair of particles . the simplest combination of these ingredients , giving a non zero result for @xmath0 , is shown in fig.[figappc ] b ) : @xmath64 is located at positive time , and @xmath16 at negative time , allowing to have @xmath87 s going only to the left . this is just the born term of @xmath73 . however one sees easily that it is not possible to draw any other second order diagrams having the same property shown in fig.[figappc ] b ) . they would necessarily imply @xmath87 s going at some stage backward in time ( i.e. with arrows pointing to the right in fig.[figappc ] ) , which is not allowed . indeed we have to dispose of the @xmath114 propagator starting at @xmath409 , and this can only be done by annihilating it with @xmath16 at some negative time . similarly the @xmath114 propagator ending up at @xmath407 has to come from @xmath64 , acting at some positive time . then we are left with a @xmath115 propagator which can only go from @xmath64 to @xmath61 . any interaction between the @xmath114 and @xmath115 propagators is forbidden since this would merely amount to double count processes which are already taken into account in @xmath64 and @xmath61 . in this way we end up with the conclusion that only the born term leads to a non zero contribution to @xmath0 . in calculating the coefficient of @xmath322 in eq.([eqcorr1 ] ) , it is clear that we can evaluate all the other factors to zeroth order in @xmath16 , since we have already an explicit factor @xmath322 . this implies in particular to make @xmath411 in these terms . this leaves us with : @xmath412 @xmath413 . naturally this result could have been obtained more directly , by a straight expansion of @xmath282 in powers of @xmath16 , instead of resumming a whole perturbation series , as we have done in section [ collmod ] , and then expanding the result . we may first apply this formula for the collective mode contribution . in the present case it comes from the factor @xmath414 , which has a pole for @xmath415 . this is indeed the frequency of the bogoliubov mode , once the frequency is high enough for the zeroth order approximation in @xmath16 to be valid . correspondingly we have @xmath416 . on the other hand , we have for this value of the frequency @xmath417^{-1}$ ] . this has to be inserted in eq.([eqgam ] ) and the integration over @xmath296 has still to be performed . however if we concentrate on the low @xmath296 range ( where @xmath418 ) , we obtain a divergent integral @xmath419 . this is due to the fact that , in this range , our zeroth order handling in @xmath420 is not careful enough . from eq.([bog ] ) , we see that the dispersion relation has to be modified for @xmath421 . if we evaluate the low frequency contribution by putting a lower cut - off @xmath422 in the integral , we obtain @xmath423 and the overall result is of order @xmath2 . this is just the contribution eq.([ncmfin ] ) , where we have obtained the precise coefficient by our careful handling of this low frequency domain . now , if we define the low momentum region as @xmath424 , where @xmath425 is large compared to @xmath422 , but small compared to @xmath188 , our above treatment of the low frequency region is fully valid in this domain . on the other hand the integral in eq.([eqintx ] ) has already converged at the upper bound @xmath426 , and we may replace it by @xmath427 , just as we have done in eq.([eqintx ] ) . hence the contribution from the domain @xmath424 is exactly given by eq.([ncmfin ] ) . on the other hand , there are no divergences in the domain @xmath428 and its contribution is of order @xmath322 , and accordingly negligible compared to eq.([ncmfin ] ) . to be complete we have also to verify that there are no other sources of divergence in eq.([eqgam ] ) , analogous to what we have found at low momentum . since there is no singularity arising at finite frequency or momentum , the only possibility comes from the large frequency @xmath429 , large momentum @xmath430 region . in order to evaluate the contribution in this domain , it is more convenient to go back to the imaginary axis contour by performing backward the first step of eq.([eqcorr1 ] ) and write this overall contribution as : @xmath431 the scattering amplitudes @xmath432 and @xmath433 , introduced by @xmath254 and @xmath434 , may be shown to be equal and are dominated as expected in this range by the born contribution . they are real on this imaginary frequency axis . the born term has been obtained explicitely in @xcite , and @xmath432 is proportional to @xmath435 for large @xmath436 and @xmath437 . from eq.([2vertex ] ) there is in the modulus of the integrand a factor @xmath438^{3/4}$ ] coming from @xmath439 . then the overall integral is easily seen to be convergent for large @xmath436 and @xmath437 , which completes our proof . since there is no zeroth order term in powers of @xmath420 in @xmath329 , we have only to remove the term proportional to @xmath214 to avoid double counting , and go in this way from @xmath329 to @xmath440 . the corresponding diagram in @xmath31 is shown in fig.[figdiagsub ] . this leads to : @xmath441 where @xmath254 is given by eq.([gammirra ] ) . let us first replace the dimer propagator @xmath108 , given by eq.([2vertex ] ) , by its value @xmath442 where @xmath443 is replaced by its zeroth order value @xmath352 . when we consider the contribution from the low frequency and momentum contribution , we may replace @xmath254 by @xmath444 , and the pole of @xmath445 at @xmath446 gives : @xmath447= \frac{4\pi \mu _ b\sqrt{e_b}}{m^{3/2 } } \frac{4m}{{\bf p}^2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this is indeed the second term in the right - hand side of eq.([eqgamaslash ] ) since in this last equation , which turns out to be of order @xmath448 , we have to make consistently @xmath449 ( and similarly we have to take @xmath450 , with @xmath451 ) . we are now left with the evaluation of the difference between our original expression and the one we have just considered , namely : @xmath452\end{aligned}\ ] ] which gives at the level of eq.([eqgap3 ] ) , after insertion at the level of eq.([eqfapp ] ) and summation over @xmath18 and @xmath71 : @xmath453 t_4(p,0;0 ) \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used eq.([gammirra ] ) for @xmath254 and the relation ( see ref . @xcite ) between @xmath192 and @xmath127 , namely @xmath454 . we show now that this difference is just what is required to be allowed to replace @xmath455 in eq.([eqt4 ] ) by @xmath456 , which is directly related to the dimer - dimer scattering scattering length @xmath1 by eq.([eqam ] ) . indeed it has been shown in @xcite that scattering amplitude @xmath457 satisfies quite generally an integral equation analogous to the standard integral equation for elementary bosons , namely : @xmath458 where @xmath459 is the sum of all irreducible diagrams with respect to cutting two dimer propagators , which is itself obtained from an integral equation with explicit kernel @xcite . formally this equation can be rewritten in terms of operators as : @xmath460 where we have introduced the diagonal operator @xmath461 ( the factor @xmath330 is again topological ) . we consider now this equation for @xmath462 and @xmath259 . with respect to the energy variable corresponding to @xmath71 , we take the two values @xmath195 and @xmath463 ( we note the operators with this last value with a superscript @xmath464 ) . the crucial point is that the difference between @xmath465 and @xmath466 is of order @xmath467 , that is the expansion of @xmath465 in powers of @xmath467 is regular . such a difference is negligible at the order we are working at . the regularity of the expansion can be seen from the integral equation ( eq.(b2 ) of ref.@xcite ) satisfied by @xmath465 , which is completely analogous to the one satisfied by @xmath127 ( eq.(9 ) of ref.@xcite ) , except that the last term ( with two dimer propagators ) in the equation for @xmath127 is not present for @xmath465 . this integral equation can be transformed in the same way , leading to more explicit expressions ( see eq.(11 ) and eq.(13 ) of ref.@xcite ) . on these expressions one checks easily that , for @xmath19 in the vicinity of @xmath352 , the propagator @xmath202 is evaluated for values of its argument which are never in the vicinity of its pole . hence one can proceed to a regular expansion . by contrast one sees also on the equations for @xmath127 that , for the term containing two dimer propagators the argument does reach the pole value , which makes the expansion singular . this explains why we can not argue that the difference between @xmath468 and @xmath469 is of order @xmath467 and negligible . the equation for @xmath470 reads : @xmath471^{-1}=\left[t_4 ^ 0\right]^{-1}+d^0\end{aligned}\ ] ] writing the difference with eq.([eqform ] ) and taking into account @xmath472 , we have : @xmath473^{-1}-t_4^{-1}=d - d_0\end{aligned}\ ] ] which can be rewritten explicitely , after premultiplication by @xmath474 and postmultiplication by @xmath475 , as : @xmath476t_4(q,0;\{{\bf 0},-e_b\})\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the last term we have been allowed to replace @xmath195 by @xmath270 at the order we are working . the same substitution is allowed in eq.([eqabc ] ) , which completes our proof . let us finally note that , with respect to this part , our procedure has obvious strong analogies with the work of beliaev @xcite . indeed , as soon as we have established the non trivial result that , at our level of approximation , the structure of @xmath465 can be omitted which makes it analogous to an effective interaction , our dimers behave as elementary bosons and we are basically back to the situation investigated by beliaev . for a very recent review , see s. giorgini , l. p. pitaevskii and s. stringari , arxiv:0706.3360 and to be published in rev . j. bardeen , l. n. cooper and j. r. schrieffer , phys . rev . * 108 * , 1175 ( 1957 ) . l. p. pitaevskii , zh . . phys . * 37 * , 1794 ( 1959 ) [ sov . jetp * 10 * , 1267 ( 1960 ) ] ; l. n. cooper , r. l. mills and a. m. sessler , phys . rev . * 114 * , 1377 ( 1959 ) . s. a. moskalenko , fiz . tverd . tela * 4 * , 276 ( 1962 ) [ sov . solid state * 4 * , 199 ( 1962 ) ] ; j. m. blatt , k. w. ber and w. brandt , phys . rev . * 126 * , 1692 ( 1962 ) . l. v. keldysh and a. n. kozlov , zh . . phys . * 54 * , 978 ( 1968 ) [ sov . jetp * 27 * , 521 ( 1968 ) ] v. n. popov , zh . 50 * , 1550 ( 1966 ) , [ sov . jetp * 23 * , 1034 ( 1966 ) ] . d. m. eagles , phys . rev . * 186 * , 456 ( 1969 ) ; d.m . eagles , r.j . tainsh , c. andrikidis , physica c * 157 * , 48 ( 1989 ) . a. j. leggett , j. phys . ( paris ) , colloq . * 41 * , c7 - 19 ( 1980 ) ; in _ modern trends in the theory of condensed matter _ , edited by a. pekalski and j. przystawa ( springer , berlin ) p. nozires and s. schmitt - rink , j. low temp . * 59 * , 195 ( 1985 ) . s ' a de melo , m. randeria and j.r . engelbrecht , phys . rev . lett . * 71 * , 3202 ( 1993 ) . r. combescot , phys . * 91 * , 120401 ( 2003 ) . r. haussmann , z. phys . b * 91 * , 291(1993 ) . p. pieri and g. c. strinati , phys . lett . * 91 * , 030401 ( 2003 ) . p. pieri and g. c. strinati , phys . rev b , * 61 * , 15370 ( 2000 ) . d. s. petrov , c. salomon , and g.v . shlyapnikov , phys . * 93 * , 090404 ( 2004 ) . brodsky , a.v . klaptsov , m.yu . kagan , r. combescot and x. leyronas , j.e.t.p . letters * 82 * , 273 ( 2005 ) and phys . a * 73 * , 032724 ( 2006 ) . x. leyronas and r. combescot , phys . lett . * 99 * , 170402 ( 2007 ) . we set @xmath477 throughout the paper . t. d. lee and c. n. yang , phys . rev . * 105 * , 1119 ( 1957 ) ; t. d. lee , k. huang and c. n. yang , phys . rev . * 106 * , 1135 ( 1957 ) . s. t. beliaev , sov . jetp * 7 * , 289 ( 1958 ) . s. stringari , europhys . lett . * 65 * , 749 ( 2004 ) . g. e. astrakharchik , r. combescot , x. leyronas and s. stringari , phys . 030404 ( 2005 ) . g. e. astrakharchik , j. boronat , j. casulleras , and s. giorgini , phys . . lett . * 93 * , 200404 ( 2004 ) . a. altmeyer , s. riedl , c. kohstall , m. j. wright , r. geursen , m. bartenstein , c. chin , j. hecker denschlag , and r. grimm , phys . lett . * 98 * , 040401 ( 2007 ) . for an introduction to many - body techniques and superconductivity , see for example a. a. abrikosov , l. p. gorkov and i. e. dzyaloshinski , _ methods of quantum field theory in statistical physics _ ( dover , new york , 1975 ) and a. l. fetter and j. d. walecka , _ quantum theory of many - particle systems _ ( mcgraw - hill , new york , 1971 ) . d. vollhardt and p. wlfle , _ the superfluid phases of helium 3 _ ( taylor and francis , 1990 ) and references therein . v. m. galitskii , sov . jetp * 7 * , 104(1958 ) . for an introduction and references , see l. pitaevskii and s. stringari , _ bose - einstein condensation _ ( oxford , 2003 ) . Abstract:
[ "we present an exact many - body theory of ultracold fermionic gases for the bose - einstein condensation ( bec ) regime of the bec - bcs crossover . this is a purely fermionic approach which treats explicitely and systematically the dimers formed in the bec regime as made of two fermions . we consider specifically the zero temperature case and calculate the first terms of the expansion of the chemical potential in powers of the density @xmath0 . we derive first the mean - field contribution , which has the expected standard expression when it is written in terms of the dimer - dimer scattering length @xmath1 . we go next in the expansion to the lee - huang - yang order , proportional to @xmath2 . we find the far less obvious result that it retains also the same expression in terms of @xmath1 as for elementary bosons . the composite nature of the dimers appears only in the next term proportional to @xmath3 ." ]
16,813
16,813
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: tremendous progress has been realized in the last decades concerning the theoretical foundation of quantum optics in dielectric media . while the historical approach proposed by jauch and watson @xcite was already based on the standard canonical quantization formalism for fields , it neglected dispersion and dissipation which are intrinsic properties of any causal dielectric media satisfying kramers krnig relations . since then several important studies were devoted to the extension of the method to inhomogeneous and artificially structured media which are central issues in modern micro and nano photonics @xcite . furthermore , theoretical approaches adapted to transparent but dispersive media with negligible losses have been also developed based on different techniques such as the slowly varying envelope approximation @xcite or the quasi modal expansion method which is valid near resonance for polaritons @xcite . more recently , losses were included in the theory by adding phenomenologically some optical dissipation channels in the light propagation path @xcite . such a method was successfully used for the modeling of casimir forces in dissipative media @xcite and surface plasmon polaritons @xcite . + moreover , the most fundamental progress was probably done when huttner and barnett , and others @xcite proposed a self - consistent canonical quantization procedure for an homogeneous and causal dielectric medium by coupling photonic degrees of freedom with mechanical oscillator variables acting as thermal baths . the method , based on the pioneer works by fano and hopfield @xcite ( see also ref . @xcite ) , was subsequently extended to several inhomogeneous systems including anisotropic and magnetic properties @xcite . in parallel to these theoretical works based on the standard canonical quantization method , a different and powerful axis of research appeared after the work by gruner and welsch @xcite ( see also ref.@xcite ) based on the quantum langevin noise approach used in cavity qed ( i.e. , quantum electrodynamics ) @xcite . the method is also known as the green tensor method @xcite since it relies on efficient green dyadic techniques used nowadays in nano - photonics and plasmonics @xcite . this ` langevin - noise ' approach , which actually extends earlier ` semi classical ' researches based on the fluctuation - dissipation theorem by lifshitz and many others in the context of casimir and optical forces @xcite , was successfully applied in the recent years to many issues concerning photonics @xcite and nano - plasmonics where dissipation can not be neglected @xcite . in this context the relationship between the huttner - barnett approach on the one side and the langevin noise method on the other side has attracted much attention in the last years , and several works attempted to demonstrate the validity of the langevin noise method from a rigorous hamiltonian perspective which is more in a agreement with the canonical huttner - barnett approach @xcite . + the aim of this work is to revisit these derivations of the equivalence between the langevin noise and hamitonian method and to show that some unphysical assumptions actually limit the domain of validity of the previous attempts . more precisely , as we will show in this work , the analysis and derivations always included some hypothesis concerning causality and boundary conditions which actually lead to circularity in the deductions and are not applicable to the most general inhomogeneous systems used in nano - optics . specifically , these derivations , like the fluctuation - dissipation reasoning in lifshitz and rytov works @xcite , give too much emphasis on the material origin of quantum fluctuations for explaining macroscopic quantum electrodynamics in continuous media . however , as it was already pointed out in the 1970 s @xcite , one must include with an equal footings both field and matter fluctuations in a self consistent qed hamiltonian in order to preserve rigorously unitarity and causality @xcite . while this does nt impact too much the homogeneous medium case considered by huttner and barnett @xcite it is crucial to analyze further the inhomogeneous medium problem in order to give a rigorous foundation to the gruner and welsch theory @xcite based on fluctuating currents . this is the central issue tackled in the present work . + the layout of this paper is as follows : in section ii we review the lagrangian method developed in our previous work @xcite based on an alternative dual formalism for describing the huttner - barnett model . in this section we summarize the essential elements of the general lagrangian and hamiltonian model necessary for the present study . in particular we present the fundamental issue about the correct definition of hamiltonian which will be discussed at length in this article . in section iii we provide a quantitative discussion of the huttner - barnett model for an homogeneous dielectric medium . we discuss a modal expansion into plane waves and separate explicitly the electromagnetic field into classical eigenmodes and noise related langevin s modes . we show that both contributions are necessary for preserving unitarity and time symmetry . we consider limit cases such as the ideal hopfield - fano polaritons @xcite without dissipation and the weakly dissipative polariton modes considered by milonni and others @xcite . we discuss the physical interpretation of the hamiltonian of the whole system and interpret the various contributions with respect to the langevin noise method and to the loss - less hopfield - fano limit . in section iv we generalize our analysis to the inhomogeneous medium case by using a green dyadic formalism in both the frequency and time domain . we demonstrate that in general it is necessary to keep both pure photonic and material fluctuations to preserve the unitarity and time symmetry of the quantum evolution . we conclude with a discussion about the physical meaning of the hamiltonian in presence of inhomogeneities and interpret the various terms associated with photonic and material modes . in ref . @xcite we developed a new lagrangian formalism adapted to qed in dielectric media without magnetic properties . here we will use this model to derive our approach but a standard treatment based on the minimal coupling scheme @xcite or the power - zienau @xcite transformation would lead to similar results . we start with the dual lagrangian density : @xmath0 where @xmath1 and @xmath2 are the magnetic and displacement fields respectively . in this formalism the usual magnetic potential @xmath3 , defined such as @xmath4 , is replaced by the dual electric potential @xmath5 ( in the ` coulomb ' gauge @xmath6 ) defined by @xmath7 implying @xmath8 the material part @xmath9 of the lagrangian density in eq . [ 1 ] reads @xmath10 with @xmath11 the material oscillator fields describing the huttner - barnett bath coupled to the electromagnetic field . the coupling depends on the polarization density which is defined by @xmath12 where the coupling function @xmath13 defines the conductivity of the medium at the harmonic pulsation @xmath14 . from eq . [ 1 ] and euler - lagrange equations we deduce the dynamical laws for the electromagnetic field @xmath15 with the electric field @xmath16 . similarly for the material oscillators we have : @xmath17we point out that the lagrangian density in eq . [ 1 ] includes a term @xmath18 which is necessary for the derivation of the dynamical laws for the material fields @xmath19 @xcite . furthermore , to complete the qed canonical quantization procedure of the material field we introduce the lowering @xmath20 and rising @xmath21 operators for the bosonic material field from the relation @xmath22 . as explained in ref . @xcite by using the equal time commutation relations between the canonical variables @xmath11 and @xmath23 , we deduce the fundamental rules @xmath24=\delta(\omega-\omega')\delta^3(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'})\textbf{i}. \label{33}\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( with @xmath25 the unit dyad ) and @xmath26=[\mathbf{f}^\dagger_\omega(\mathbf{x},t),\mathbf{f}^\dagger_{\omega'}(\mathbf{x}',t)]=0 $ ] allowing a clear interpretation of @xmath20 and @xmath27 as lowering and rising operators for the bosonic states associated with the matter oscillators . + moreover , eqs . [ 5],[8 ] can be formally integrated leading to @xmath28 where @xmath29 is an initial time and where @xmath30 is a fluctuating dipole density distribution defined by : @xmath31 \nonumber\\ \label{35}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath32 and where by definition @xmath33 . we therefore have @xmath34 which is reminiscent of the general linear response theory used in thermodynamics @xcite . we point out that the term @xmath35 can be seen as an induced dipole density . however , as we will show in the next section the electric field itself is decomposed into a purely fluctuating term @xmath36 and a scattered field @xmath37 which depends on the density @xmath38 . therefore , the contribution @xmath35 to @xmath39 is also decomposed into a pure photon - fluctuation term @xmath40 and an induced term @xmath41 related to material fluctuations @xmath38 . + importantly , the linear susceptibility @xmath42 which is defined by @xmath43 characterizes completely the dispersive and dissipative dielectric medium . we can show that the permittivity @xmath44 is an analytical function in the upper part of the complex plane @xmath45 , i.e. , @xmath46 , provided @xmath42 is finite for any time @xmath47 . from this we deduce the symmetry @xmath48 and it is possible to derive the general kramers - krnig relations existing between the real part @xmath49\equiv\widetilde{\varepsilon}'(\mathbf{x},\omega)$ ] and the imaginary part @xmath50\equiv\widetilde{\varepsilon}''(\mathbf{x},\omega)$ ] of the dielectric permittivity . therefore , the huttner - barnett model characterized by the conductivity @xmath51 is fully causal and can be applied to describe any inhomogeneous dielectric media in the linear regime . + the central issue of the present paper concerns the definition of the hamiltonian @xmath52 in the huttner - barnett model . we remind that in ref . @xcite we derived the result : @xmath53 with @xmath54 where @xmath55:$ ] means , as usually , a normally - ordered product for removing the infinite zero - point energy . inserting the definition for @xmath20 obtained earlier we get for the material part @xmath56 which has the standard structure for oscillators ( i.e. , without the infinite zero - point energy ) . + however , hutner and barnett @xcite after diagonalizing their hamiltonian found that the total evolution is described in the homogeneous medium case by @xmath57 while as we will see this is actually a correct description ` for all practical purpose ' in a homogeneous dissipative medium for large class of physical boundary conditions , this is in general not acceptable in order to preserve time - symmetry and unitarity in the full hilbert space for interacting matter and light . the general method based on langevin forces and noises avoided quite generally mentioning that difficult point . we emphasize that while the conclusions presented in refs . @xcite is accepted by more or less all authors on the subject @xcite they have been some some few dissident views ( see refs . @xcite ) claiming , that in the context of an input - output formalism , the langevin noise formalism is not complete unless we consider as well fluctuations of the free photon modes ( see also the replies with an opposite perspective in refs . @xcite ) . in the present work we will generalize and give a rigrous qed like hamiltonian foundations to the prescriptions of refs . @xcite and we will show that it is actually necessary to include a full description of photonic and material quantum excitations in order to preserve unitarity . in order to appreciate this fact further we will first consider the problem associated with quantization of the electromagnetic field . we first introduce the paradigmatic homogeneous medium case considered initially by huttner and barnett @xcite , i.e. , with @xmath58 . we start with faraday s law : @xmath59 rewritten according to eq . [ 21 ] as : @xmath60 inserting eq . [ 4 ] and using the coulomb ( transverse ) gauge condition we get : @xmath61 we use the modal expansion method developed in ref . @xcite and write @xmath62 with @xmath63 a generic label for the wave vector @xmath64 , @xmath65 ( here we consider as it is usually done the periodical ` box ' born - von karman expansion in the rectangular box of volume @xmath66 ) , @xmath67 or 2 , labels the two transverse polarization states with unit vectors @xmath68 , and @xmath69 ( conventions and details are given in appendix a of ref . @xcite ) . inserting eq . [ 40 ] into eq . [ 91 ] we obtain the dynamical equation : @xmath70 with the time dependent source term @xmath71 to solve this equation we use the laplace transform of the fields which is defined below . + we are interested in the evolution for @xmath72 of a field @xmath73 which fourier transform is not necessary well mathematically defined since the field is not going to zero fast enough for @xmath74 ( e.g. , a fluctuating current or field ) . the method followed here is to consider the forward laplace transform of the different evolution equations ( such an approach was also used by suttorp by mixing both forward and backward laplace s transforms @xcite ) . to deal with this problem we first change the time @xmath75 variable in @xmath76 and define @xmath77 . we define the ( forward ) laplace transform of @xmath78 as : @xmath79 with @xmath80 ( @xmath14 a real number and @xmath81 ) . the presence of the term @xmath82 ensures the convergence . we will not here introduce the backward laplace transform @xmath83 since the time @xmath29 is arbitrary and can be sent into the remote past if needed . + as it is well known , the ( forward ) laplace transform is connected to the usual fourier transform since we have @xmath84 where @xmath85 is the fourier transform of @xmath86 with respect to @xmath75 . + now for the specific problem considered here we obtain the separation @xmath87 . the @xmath88 contribution corresponds to what classically we call a sum of eigenmodes supported by the medium ( i.e. with @xmath89 ) while the @xmath90 term is the fluctuating field generated by the langevin source @xmath91 . more explicitly , we have for the source term : @xmath92 where we use eq . [ 93 ] . the propagator function @xmath93 is expressed as a bromwich contour : @xmath94 where @xmath95 is defined as @xmath96 . we remind that a bromwich integral by definition will vanish for @xmath97 so that on the left side we actually mean @xmath98 . + the function @xmath93 has some remarkable properties which should be emphasized here . we first introduce the ` zeros ' of @xmath99 , i.e. , the set of roots @xmath100 solutions of @xmath101 . from the causal properties of @xmath102 we have @xmath103 and therefore we deduce @xmath104 implying that the ` + ' and ` - ' roots are not independent . the important fact is that the roots are located in the lower complex plane associated with a negative imaginary part of the frequency @xcite ( this is proven in appendix a ) . now , as shown in appendix b the integral in eq . [ 95 ] can be computed by contour integration in the complex plane after closing the contour with a semi - circle in the lower plane and using the cauchy residue theorem . we get : @xmath105 we also get @xmath106 for @xmath107 ( after integration in the upper plane and considering in detail the case @xmath108 ) . clearly , the function @xmath93 is here expanded into a sum of modes which define the polaritons of the problem ( this is shown explicitly in the next subsection ) . here , the normal mode frequency @xmath109 are complex numbers ensuring the damped nature of the waves in the future direction . we emphasize that in our knowledge this kind of formula has never been discussed before . the expansion in eq . [ 98 ] is however rigorous and generalizes the quasimodal approximations used in the weak dissipation regime and discussed in subsection iii(f ) . + similarly the source - free term @xmath110 reads : @xmath111 with the new propagator function @xmath112 like for @xmath113 we get @xmath114 for @xmath107 . additionally , the boundary condition at @xmath115 ( i.e. , @xmath116 ) imposes @xmath117 ( see appendix b ) . + the electromagnetic field can be calculated using the expansion eq . [ 94 ] or [ 100 ] . first , the mathematical and physical structure of the free - field is seen by using the modal expansion : @xmath118\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x})\nonumber\\ = \sum_{\alpha , j , m}\frac{-\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)})}{2i\omega_\alpha}\frac{e^{-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}(t - t_0)}}{\frac{\partial(\omega\sqrt{\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)})}{\partial \omega}|_{\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}}}[\dot{q}_{\alpha , j}(t_0)\nonumber\\-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}q_{\alpha , j}(t_0)]\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x } ) + hcc.\label{117}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we used the symmetries of the modal expansion @xcite together with @xmath119 . from this we directly obtain : @xmath120\boldsymbol{\hat{k}}_{\alpha}\times\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x})\nonumber\\ = \sum_{\alpha , j , m}\frac{-\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)})}{2c}\frac{e^{-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}(t - t_0)}}{\frac{\partial(\omega\sqrt{\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)})}{\partial \omega}|_{\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}}}[\dot{q}_{\alpha , j}(t_0)\nonumber\\-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}q_{\alpha , j}(t_0)]\boldsymbol{\hat{k}}_{\alpha}\times\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x } ) + hcc . \label{118}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and similarly for the magnetic field : @xmath121\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x})\nonumber\\ = \sum_{\alpha , j , m}\frac{\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)})}{2c\omega_\alpha}\frac{e^{-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}(t - t_0)}}{\frac{\partial(\omega\sqrt{\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)})}{\partial \omega}|_{\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}}}[\dot{q}_{\alpha , j}(t_0)\nonumber\\-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}q_{\alpha , j}(t_0)]\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x } ) + hcc . \label{119}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the ( transverse ) electric field associated with this free solutions can also be obtained from the definition @xmath122 . we have thus @xmath123 and considering the laplace transform in eqs . [ 100 ] and [ 101 ] we can express the electric field as a function of @xmath93 , i.e. , @xmath124\boldsymbol{\hat{k}}_{\alpha}\times\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x})\nonumber\\ = \sum_{\alpha , j , m}\frac{-1}{2c}\frac{e^{-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}(t - t_0)}}{\frac{\partial(\omega\sqrt{\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)})}{\partial \omega}|_{\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}}}[\dot{q}_{\alpha , j}(t_0)\nonumber\\-i\omega_{\alpha , m}^{(-)}q_{\alpha , j}(t_0)]\boldsymbol{\hat{k}}_{\alpha}\times\boldsymbol{\hat{\epsilon}}_{\alpha , j}\phi_\alpha(\mathbf{x } ) + hcc . \label{120}\end{aligned}\ ] ] from eqs . [ 119 ] and [ 120 ] we see that @xmath125 in agreement with maxwell s equation for a free - field ( the other maxwell s equations are also automatically fulfilled by definition ) . + importantly , in the vacuum case where @xmath126 we have @xmath127 and we find that the vacuum fields are given by @xmath128 with @xmath129 as expected . in the general case however causality imposes that the imaginary part of @xmath109 is negative . therefore the optical modes labeled by @xmath63 , @xmath130 and @xmath131 are damped in time ( the only exception being of course the vacuum case where the only contribution to the field arises from the source - free term @xmath88 since the @xmath90 terms vanishes together with @xmath38 ) . as a consequence , if @xmath132 the free terms vanish asymptotically . in particular , if @xmath133 ( corresponding to initial conditions fixed in the infinite remote past ) we can omit for all practical purposes the contribution of @xmath134 , @xmath135 , and @xmath136 to the field observed at any finite time @xmath75 ( unless we are in the vacuum ) . this is indeed what was implicitly done by huttner and barnet @xcite and gruner and welsch @xcite and that is why for all calculational needs they completely omitted the discussion of the @xmath134 , @xmath135 , and @xmath136 fields . however , for preserving the unitarity of the full evolution one must necessarily include both @xmath88 and @xmath90 terms . while this problem is apparently only technical we will see in the following its importance for inhomogeneous systems . + the previous discussion concerning the omission of the @xmath88 source free terms is very important since it explains the mechanism at work in the huttner barnet model @xcite . to clarify that point further we now express the scattered field @xmath90 using a green tensor formalism ( in appendix c we introduce alternative descriptions based on vectorial and scalar potentials ) . we first observe that from @xmath137 we obtain after integration by parts : @xmath138 with the dyadic propagator @xcite : @xmath139 the meaning of the tensor @xmath140 , which depends on @xmath141 , becomes more clear if we introduce the green tensor @xmath142 solution of @xmath143 we observe that if we separate the tensor into a transverse and longitudinal part we get @xmath144 with for the transverse dyadic green function @xmath145 and for the longitudinal part @xmath146 with the unit longitudinal dyadic distribution @xmath147 . we have also the important relations between the tensor @xmath140 and @xmath142 : @xmath148 now if we write @xmath149 and introduce the relation @xmath150 with @xmath151 the free mode given by eq . [ 120 ] and @xmath152 the source field , induced by @xmath153 , which is given by @xmath154 we get @xmath155 , i.e. , eq . [ rehh ] as it could be checked directly after comparing eq . [ s ] with eqs . [ gper ] and [ gpar ] . others important relations between the dyadic formalism and scalar green function are given in appendix d. + importantly , we can write all scattered field as a function of the rising and lowering operators @xmath156 , @xmath157 . in order to give explicit expressions we use the fourier transform notations ( i.e. , with @xmath80 with @xmath158 ) and the relation @xcite @xmath159\nonumber\\ \label{36}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we obtain : @xmath160 @xmath161where @xmath162 is a lowering operator associated with the transverse fluctuating field and defined as @xmath163 such that from eq . [ 33 ] we get the mode commutator @xmath164 and the harmonic time evolution @xmath165 if we impose the initial condition @xmath166 . + for the longitudinal electric field we deduce from eq . [ gpar ] and eq . [ cool2 ] @xmath167 ( in agreement with the definition @xmath168 ) and therefore : @xmath169 we have @xmath170 and the commutator @xmath171=\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta_{j , k}\delta(\omega-\omega')$ ] and the time evolution @xmath172 with similar initial condition as for the transverse field . regrouping these definition we have obviously @xmath173 furthermore , we can easily show that we have also @xmath174 leading to @xmath175 the description of the scattered field @xmath90 given here corresponds exactly to what huttner and barnett @xcite called the quantized field obtained after generalizing the diagonalization procedure of fano and hopfield@xcite . here we justify these modes by using the laplace transform method and by taking the limit @xmath176 explicitly . this means that we neglect the contribution of the @xmath88 transverse field which is infinitely damped at time @xmath75 . importantly @xmath30 does nt vanish since the time evolution of @xmath177 in eq . [ 35 ] is harmonic . it is important to further comment about causality and on the structure of the total field as a sum of @xmath88 and @xmath90 modes . the @xmath88 ( classical polariton ) modes are indeed exponentially damped in the future direction meaning that a privileged temporal direction apparently holds in this model . this would mean that we somehow break the time symmetry of the problem . however , since the evolution equations are fundamentally time symmetric this should clearly not be possible . similarly , propagators such as @xmath142 are also spatially damped at large distance , see eq . [ 103 ] , since we have terms like @xmath178 . this also seems to imply a privileged time direction and would lead to a kind of paradox . however , we should remind that only the sum @xmath88 + @xmath90 has a physical meaning and this sum must preserves time symmetry . indeed , we remind that time reversal applied to electrodynamics implies that if @xmath179 , @xmath180 , and @xmath181 is a solution of the coupled set of equations given in section ii then the time reversed solutions @xcite @xmath182 , @xmath183 , and @xmath184 is also defining a solution of the same equations ( we have also @xmath185 and @xmath186 ) . now , considering the dipole density evolution we get from eq . [ 18 ] after some manipulations : @xmath187 where @xmath188 is defined as @xmath38 ( see the definition eq . [ 35 ] ) but with @xmath189 replaced by @xmath190 . the presence of the time @xmath191 everywhere has a clear meaning . indeed , from special relativity choosing a time reference frame with @xmath192 ( passive time reversal transformation ) implies that the causal evolution of @xmath39 defined for @xmath72 will become an anticausal evolution defined for @xmath193 . going back to the active time reversal transformation eq . [ 18bis ] we see that the new linear susceptibility @xmath194 is given by @xmath195 ( @xmath196 is explicitly written in order to emphasize the anticausal structure . however , since we have @xmath197 and @xmath198 we have @xmath199 . this means that the new permittivity ( with poles in the upper half complex frequency space ) is now associated with growing anticausal modes since @xmath200 . the ( active ) time reversed evolution is defined for @xmath201 so that we indeed get modes decaying into the past direction while growing into the future direction . this becomes even more clear for the time reversal evolution of the electromagnetic field given by the separation in @xmath88 and @xmath90 modes . the time reversal applied on the @xmath88 field such as @xmath202 corresponding to classical polaritons is now involving frequency @xmath203 instead of @xmath109 . this leads to reversed temporal evolution such as @xmath204 and @xmath205 associated with growing waves in the future direction ( since the new poles are now in the upper half complex frequency space ) . more generally , we have shown ( see appendix c ) that the full evolution of either @xmath88 or @xmath90 fields is completely defined by the knowledge of the green function and propagators such as @xmath206 ( see eq . [ 106 ] ) with the causal function @xmath93 given by the bromwich fourier integral @xmath207 . now , like for the susceptibility @xmath208 time reversal leads to a new propagator @xmath209 and therefore by a reasoning equivalent to the previous one to @xmath210 involving the complex conjugate @xmath211 with a fourier expansion @xmath212 which again involves the anticausal permittivity @xmath213 . this naturally leads to growing waves in the future direction and to green function spatially growing as@xmath214 . the full equivalence between the two representation of the total field @xmath215 is completed if first we observe that the initial conditions at @xmath29 ( i.e. , @xmath216 , @xmath217 , etc ... ) are now replaced by final boundary condition at @xmath218 ( i.e. , @xmath219 , @xmath220 , etc ... ) . second , since the @xmath191 value is arbitrary we can send it into the remote future if we want and we will have thus a evolution expressed in term of growing modes for all times @xmath221 . the value of the field at such a boundary is of course arbitrary , so that if we want the two representation can describe the same field if for the final field at @xmath222 we take the field evolving from @xmath29 using the usual causal evolution from past to future . this equivalence is of course reminiscent from the dual representations obtained using either retarded or advanced waves @xcite . indeed , the total electric field @xmath223 can always be separated into @xmath224 or equivalently @xmath225 where @xmath226 and @xmath227 label the retarded and advanced source fields respectively and @xmath228 and @xmath229 label the homogeneous ` free ' fields coming from the past and from the future respectively . this implies that only a specific choice of boundary conditions in the past or future can lead to a completely causal evolution and therefore time symmetry in not broken in the evolution equations but only through a specification of the boundary conditions . in other worlds , in agreement with the famous loschmidt and poincar objections to boltzmann , strictly deriving time irreversibility from an intrinsically time reversible dynamics is obviously impossible without additional postulates . this point was fully recognized already by boltzmann long ago and was the basis for his statistical interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics @xcite . + in order to further understand the implication of the huttner - barnett model @xcite we should discuss how the full hamiltionan finally reads in this formalism . this is central since the langevin noise equations developed by gruner and welsch @xcite use only the @xmath230 hamitonian . in the huttner - barnett model the full dynamics is determined by the complete knowledge of the dipole density @xmath231 so that the results of gruner and welsch @xcite should be in principle justifiable . however , if we are not careful , this will ultimately break unitary and time - symmetry . in order to understand the physical mechanism at work one should first clarify the relation existing between the hutner - barnett model , using @xmath231 as a fundamental field , and the historical hopfield - fano approach @xcite for defining discrete polariton modes as normal coordinate solutions of the full hamiltonian . + we remind that the historical method for dealing with polariton is indeed based on the pioneer work by fano and hopfield @xcite for diagonalizing the full hamiltonian . the procedure is actually reminiscent of the classical problem of finding normal coordinates and normal ( real valued ) eigen frequencies associated with free vibrations of a system of linearly coupled harmonic oscillators . the classical diagonalization method @xcite relies on the resolution of secular equations already studied by laplace . actually , the first ` semiclassical ' treatment made by born and huang @xcite is mathematically correct and equivalent to the one made later by fano and hopfield even though the relation between those formalisms is somehow hidden behind the mathematical symbols . the full strategy for finding normal coordinates and frequencies becomes clear if we use fourier transforms of the various fields for the problem under study . indeed , a fourier expansion of a field component @xmath232 will obviously define the needed harmonic expansion . in the problems considered by born , huang , fano , and hopfield , the fourier spectrum @xmath233 is a sum of dirac distributions @xmath234 peaked on the real valued eigenvibrations @xmath235 . this specific situation needs a complete discussion since the hopfield - fano model @xcite leads to an exact diagonalization of the full hamiltonian @xmath52 . this will in turn makes clear some fundamental relations with the laplace transform formalism used in the previous subsections . + we start with the fourier transformed equations @xmath236 @xmath237 and @xmath238 with the constraint @xmath239 , @xmath240 coming from the real valued nature of the fields . from eq . [ b ] we get using the properties of distributions : @xmath241\sqrt{\frac{2\sigma_\omega}{\pi}}\widetilde{\textbf{e}}(\omega)+\widetilde{\textbf{x}_\omega}^{(sym)}(\omega)\label{d}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath242\nonumber\\ \label{e}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and where we used the reality constraint and introduced constants of motions @xmath243 , @xmath244 which will becomes annihilation and creation operators in the second quantized formalism . the principal value can be conveniently written @xmath245=\frac{1}{\omega^2-(\omega+i0^+)^2}-\frac{i\pi}{2\omega}[\delta(\omega-\omega)-\delta(\omega+\omega)]$ ] or equivalently @xmath245=\frac{1}{\omega^2-(\omega - i0^+)^2}+\frac{i\pi}{2\omega}[\delta(\omega-\omega)-\delta(\omega+\omega)]$ ] . this leads to two different representations of eq . [ d ] : @xmath246 where @xmath247 and @xmath248 can also be written like eq . [ e ] , i.e. , respectively as @xmath249 $ ] or @xmath250 $ ] . this discussion is reminiscent of the different representation given in section iii d involving retarded , advanced or time symmetric modes . of course the usual causal representation is @xmath251 which is obtained from the definition of @xmath252 given in section iii at the limit @xmath133 . however , all the descriptions are rigorously equivalent . it is also easy to show that we have @xmath253 which justifies why we called this field symmetrical . it corresponds to a representation of the problem mixing boundary conditions in the future and the past in a symmetrical way like it was used for instance by feynman and wheeler in their description of electrodynamics @xcite as discussed in section iii d. + now after inserting the causal representation of eq . [ f ] in eq . [ c ] and then into eq . [ a ] we get @xmath254 with @xmath255 and @xmath256 this causal permittivity @xmath257 being given by the huttner - barnett model @xcite the secular equations @xmath258 for transverse modes have no root in the upper complex frequency half - plane and in particular on the real frequency axis ( the longitudinal term is discussed below ) . this means that , unlike eq . [ d ] , eq . [ g ] has in general no dirac term corresponding to independent eigenmodes . the electric field is thus represented by a source term @xmath259 obtained like in the previous subsection using a causal green function . the absence of free normal modes for the electric field is of course reminiscent from the rapid decay of the free modes @xmath88 when @xmath133 as discussed before . the representation given here does nt distinguish between transverse and longitudinal fields but this should naturally occur since we have the constraint @xmath260 which implies @xmath261 . together with eq . [ a ] we thus get @xmath262 eq . [ long ] is actually reminiscent of the charge screening by @xmath257 . here we used the fact that @xmath257 has no root on the real axis otherwise the imaginary part of the permittivity should vanish and the the medium would be lossless at the frequency @xmath263 a fact which is prohibited by physical consideration about irreversibility @xcite . this reasoning is rigorously not valid at @xmath264 since the imaginary part of the permittivity is a odd function on the real axis . but then in general to have a root at @xmath264 it would require that the real part of the permittivity vanishes as well and this is not allowed from usual permittivity model ( see eq . [ b4 ] ) which makes therefore this possibility very improbable . + the previous reasoning is clearly formally equivalent to the ones obtained in the previous subsection and in both case the field @xmath265 or @xmath231 completely determine the electromagnetic evolution . still , there are exceptions for instance in the drude lorentz model with @xmath266 which forms the basis for the hopfield @xcite polariton model . this model is rigorously not completely lossless since we have @xmath267+\frac{i\pi\omega_p^2}{2\omega_0}(\delta(\omega-\omega_0)-\delta(\omega+\omega_0))$ ] corresponding to a singular absorption peak . + moreover , in this hopfield model @xcite , which is a limit case of the huttner barnett model @xcite , we get the exact evolution equation @xmath268 which in the case of the longitudinal modes leads to solving the secular equation @xmath269 . it has the solution @xmath270 where @xmath271 isthe longitudinal plasmon frequency . however relating this result to eq . [ long ] requires careful calculations since @xmath257 is here a highly singular distribution . indeed , applying eq . [ long ] will lead to find solutions of @xmath272 with @xmath273 with @xmath274 a longitudinal vector field . this singular @xmath251 field at @xmath275 seems to imply that polaritons are resonant at such frequency in contradiction with the result leading to @xmath276 for such polariton modes . now , due to the presence of absorption peaks at @xmath275 we have near this singular points @xmath277 where @xmath278 is supposed to be regular @xcite . moreover , outside this narrow absorption band the medium is effectively lossless and instead of eq . [ long ] we have @xmath279 which has the singular solution @xmath280 with @xmath281 a longitudinal vector field . importantly , from the hypothesis of regularity at @xmath282 we have @xmath283 and therefore @xmath284 which means that @xmath285 everywhere . the lorentz - drude model leads therefore to genuine longitudinal polaritons eigenfrequencies @xmath286 solutions of @xmath287 . we emphasize that the same result could be obtained using the laplace transform method . we have indeed @xmath288 with @xmath289 . therefore we can rewrite the longitudinal scattered field as @xmath290 . moreover since there is no longitudinal @xmath88 electric field and since @xmath291 we have @xmath292 which shows that the genuine longitudinal polariton oscillates at the frequency @xmath293 as expected . + the transverse polariton modes of the hopfield model are obtained in a similar way from eq . [ g ] with @xmath294 with @xmath295 a transverse vector field . as explained in the appendix g solving the problem with a plane wave expansion labeled by @xmath63 and @xmath130 leads again to a secular equation @xmath296 for the two transverse modes ( @xmath297 ) giving a quartic dispersion relation @xmath298 with two usual hopfield solutions @xmath299}}{\sqrt{2}}.\nonumber\\ \end{aligned}\ ] ] the two - modes field have now the structure @xmath300 with @xmath301 with @xmath302 an amplitude coefficient for the mode ( see appendix e and @xcite for a derivation ) . + one of the most important issue in the context of the hopfield model concerns the hamiltonian . indeed , in this model the full hamiltonian eq . [ 10 ] @xmath303 reads @xmath304.\label{polaritonhopfield}\end{aligned}\ ] ] if we isolate first the longitudinal term we get @xmath305\nonumber\\=\int d^3\mathbf{x}[\frac{(\partial_t\mathbf{p}_{||})^2+\omega_l^2\mathbf{p}_{||}^2}{2\omega_p^2}]=2\frac{\omega_l^2}{\omega_p^2}\int d^3\mathbf{x}\boldsymbol{\beta}^\ast\boldsymbol{\beta}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can of course introduce a fourier transform of the dipole field as @xmath306 and new polariton fields amplitudes @xmath307 . we thus have @xmath308 . this expression of the hamiltonian is standard for normal coordinates expansion in linearly coupled harmonic oscillators . + furthermore , using commutators like eq . [ 33 ] one deduce @xmath309=i\hbar\delta^3(\mathbf{x}'-\mathbf{x})\textbf{i}$ ] and other similar ones . in the fourier space we thus obtain @xmath310=i\hbar\delta_{\alpha,\beta}$ ] which lead after straightforward transformation to the commutators @xmath311=\delta_{\alpha,\beta}$ ] , @xmath312=[f_{\alpha,||}^\dagger(t),f_{\beta,||}^\dagger(t)]=0.$ ] with @xmath313 ( the time dependence in the heisenberg picture means @xmath314 ) . this naturally leads to the hopfield - fano hamiltonian expansion for longitudinal polaritons : @xmath315 a similar analysis can be handled for the transverse polaritons modes but the calculation is a bit longer ( see appendix e ) . to summarize this calculation in few words : using a fourier expansion of the different primary transverse field operators in eq . [ polaritonhopfield ] we get after some manipulations the hopfield - fano expansion @xcite @xmath316 with the operator @xmath317 obeying the usual commutation rules for rising and lowering operators . again this result is expected in a modal expansion using normal coordinates and again the same result could be alternatively obtained using the laplace transform method . to summarize , the approach developed previously using the laplace transform formalism agrees with the normal coordinates methods based on the fourier expansion in the frequency domain . both approaches lead to the conclusion that for an homogeneous medium the various electromagnetic and material fields are completely determined by the knowledge of the matter oscillating dipole density @xmath318 ( fourier s method ) or @xmath231 ( laplace s method ) . in the limit @xmath133 both approach are equivalent and there is no contribution of the free field in a homogenous dissipative medium ( the residual @xmath319,@xmath320 is exponentially damped in the regime @xmath133 ) . we also showed that if losses in the huttner barnett model are sharply confined in the frequency domain we can find exact polaritonic modes which agree with the historical method developed by fano and hopfield @xcite . these modes fully diagonalize the hamitonian @xmath52 . while we focused our study on the particular drude lorentz model the result is actually generalizable @xcite to homogenous media with conductivity @xmath321 which lead to a permittivity @xmath322+i\frac{\sigma(\omega)}{\omega}.\label{dangerous}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in particular the hamiltonian can in these special cases be written as a sum of harmonic oscillator terms corresponding to the different longitudinal and transversal polariton modes . we thus write @xmath323 and @xmath324 where @xmath131 and @xmath325 label the discrete longitudinal and transverse polaritons modes . however , for a more general huttner - barnett model where the permittivity is only constrained by kramers - kronig relations such a simple interpretation is not possible and the hamiltonian is not fully diagonalized . the additional physical requirement @xcite imposing that the imaginary part of the permittivity should be rigorously positive valued , i.e. , @xmath326 , also prohibits these exceptional cases which should therefore only appear as ideal limits with loss confined in infinitely narrow absorption bands . however as we will show in the next subsection the lossless idealization represents a good approximation for a quite general class of medium with weak dissipation . the previous results of hopfield and fano have still a physical meaning and are for example used with success for the description of planar cavity polaritons @xcite . + it is particularly relevant to consider what happens in the huttner barnett approach if we relax a bit the demanding constraints of the original hopfield - fano model based on eq . [ dangerous ] . for this we consider a medium with low loss such as the medium can be considered with a good approximation as transparent in a given spectral band where the field is supposed to be limited . this approach was introduced by milonni @xcite and is based on the hamiltonian obtained long ago by brillouin @xcite and later by landau and lifschitz @xcite for dispersive but slowly absorbing media . the main idea is to replace the electromagnetic energy density @xmath327 in the full hamiltonian by a term like @xmath328 where @xmath329 is the approximately real valued permittivity of the field at the central pulsation @xmath330 with which the wave - packet propagates . since this approach has been successfully applied to quantize polaritons @xcite or surface plasmons @xcite it is particularly interesting to justify it in the context of the more rigorous huttner - barnett approach developed here . in the mean time this will justify the use of hopfield - fano approach as an effective method applicable for the low loss regime which is a good assumption in most dielectric ( excluding metals supporting lossy plasmon modes ) . + from poynting s theorem , it is usual in macroscopic electromagnetism to isolate the work density @xmath331 such as the energy conservation reads @xmath332 by direct integration we thus get the usual formula for the time derivative of the total energy @xmath333 such as : @xmath334 which cancels if the fields decay sufficiently at spatial infinity ( assumption which will be done in the following ) as it can be proven after using the poynting vector divergence and stokes theorem . we now consider a temporal integration window @xmath335 to compute the average derivative @xmath336 where @xmath337 means the magnetic energy variation during the time @xmath335 and @xmath338=\int_{t}^{t+\delta t}dt'[ ... ]$ ] is an integration domain from an initial time @xmath75 to a final time @xmath339 . the next step is to fourier expand the field in the frequency domain and we write @xmath340 where the positive frequency part of the field is defined as @xmath341 ( the negative frequency part is then @xmath342^\dagger$ ] ) . we use similar notation for the displacement field and we introduce the fourier field @xmath343 . in order to achieve the integration eq . [ energybri ] the temporal window will be supposed sufficiently large compared to the typical period @xmath344 of the light pulse . this allows us to simplify the calculation and most contributions cancel out during the integration @xcite . additionally to perform the calculation we assume that we have @xmath345 . this is a usual formula in classical physics where the term @xmath346 is supposed equal to zero , but here we are dealing with a quantized theory and we can not omit this term . furthermore , we showed that in the huttner - barnett model when @xmath133 only the @xmath90 contributions discussed in section iii c remain @xcite . assuming therefore this regime the transverse field @xmath347 , and @xmath348 are fully expressed as a function of operators @xmath162 . [ rehhd ] and [ rehhe ] allow us to define the fourier fields : @xmath349 @xmath350 for @xmath351 ( for @xmath352 we have @xmath353 where @xmath354 is given by eq . [ glopglop ] at the positive frequency @xmath355 . similar symmetries and properties hold for the electric and magnetic fields ) . we thus see that the relation @xmath356 is approximately fulfilled if we consider only frequencies near a resonance at @xmath357 ( the spectral distribution in eq . [ glopglop ] is thus extremely peaked since losses are weak ) . this dispersion relation occurs for transverse polaritons modes @xmath358 ( neglecting the imaginary part ) and if the wave packet of spectral extension @xmath359 is centered on such a wavelength we can replace with a good approximation @xmath360 by @xmath361 in the numerator of eq . [ glopglop ] leading thus to @xmath356 . after this assumption the calculation can be done like in classical textbooks @xcite and eq . [ energybri ] becomes ( this usual calculation will not be repeated here ) : @xmath362)=0 , \nonumber\\ \label{energytri}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath330 denotes now the transverse polariton frequency @xmath363 $ ] for the homogeneous medium considered here . in this formula the imaginary part of @xmath329 is systematically neglected in agreement with the reasoning discussed for instance in ref . alternatively eq . [ energytri ] could be rewritten using the time average @xmath364 in order to get the classical brillouin formula for the electric energy density in the medium but this will not be useful here . moreover , we introduce the mode operators : @xmath365 where @xmath366 is a frequency window centered on the polariton pulsation @xmath363:=\omega'_{\alpha , m}$ ] . now , if we suppose that the electromagnetic field is given by a sum of such transverse modes ( without overlap of the frequency domains @xmath366 ) then eq . [ energytri ] reads : @xmath367e_{\alpha , j , m}^{(-)}e_{\alpha , j , m}^{(+)})=0 , \label{energyquadri}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the contribution @xmath368 arises from a modal expansion of the magnetic field and from using the resonance condition in the numerator of eq . [ rehhb ] ( which involves @xmath369 ) . + what is also fundamental here is that we have the commutators ( the derivation in the complex plane in given in appendix f ) : @xmath370=\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta_{j , l}\delta_{m , n}\frac{\hbar\omega_{\alpha , m}}{2}\frac{d\omega_{\alpha , m}^2}{d\omega_\alpha^2}.\nonumber\\ \label{window}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath371=[e_{\alpha , j , m}^{(-)}(t),e_{\beta , l , n}^{(-)}(t)]=0 $ ] . these relation imply the existence of effective rising and lowering operators @xmath372 for polaritons defined by @xmath373 . + these relations were phenomenologically obtained by milonni @xcite after quantizing brillouin s energy formula . here we justify this result from the ground using the huttner - barnett formalism . importantly , after defining the optical index of the polariton mode @xmath374 we can rewrite @xmath375 as @xmath376 where @xmath377 is the group velocity of the mode defined by @xmath378 . this allows us to rewrite the operators as @xmath379 ( since @xmath380 ) and finally to have : @xmath381 the total energy is thus defined as @xmath382 which is a constant of motion defined up to an arbitrary additive constant . this formula involves only the transverse modes so that actually it gives the energy @xmath383 associated with the transverse polariton modes in weekly dissipative medium and represents a generalization of hopfield - fano results as an effective but approximative model . + few remarks are here necessary . first , the model proposed here relies on the assumption that the fields is a sum of wave packets spectrally non overlapping . this hypothesis which was also made by garrison and chio @xcite was then called the ` quasi multimonochromatic ' approximation . this assumption is certainly not necessary since milonni s model includes as a limit the rigorous hopfield- fano model @xcite which does nt rely on such an assumption . in order to justify further milonni s approach @xcite and relax the hypothesis made it is enough to observe first , that in eq . [ glopglop ] the approximation @xmath356 is quite robust even if the fields is spectrally very broad . indeed , since losses are here supposed to be very weak the resonance will practically cancel out if @xmath14 differs significantly of a values where the condition @xmath357 occurs . second , if we insert formally eqs . [ glopglop ] and eq . [ reglop ] with the previous assumption into eq . [ energytri ] then instead of the term @xmath384 in eq . [ energytri ] we get a term @xmath385 . this contribution is in general more complicated because @xmath386 depends on @xmath14 . however , using explicitly eqs . [ glopglop ] and eq . [ reglop ] and specially the fourier expansion in plane waves we see that for the specific fields considered here eq . [ energyquadri ] still holds . this means that we can again introduce polariton operators @xmath387 , and @xmath388 defined by eq . [ modepolar ] . as previously these operators depend on a frequency window @xmath366 and here these are introduced quite formally for taking into account the fact that the resonance @xmath389 is extremely peaked near the different polariton frequencies @xmath390 . a product like @xmath391 occurring in the integration will thus not contribute unless the frequency @xmath392 and @xmath14 are in a given window @xmath366 . [ energyquadri ] thus results as a very good practical approximation . + remarkably , as observed in eq . [ window ] ( and explained in appendix e ) the commutator does not depend explicitly on the size of these windows ( which are only supposed to be small compared to the separation between the different mode frequencies and large enough to include the resonance peaks as explained in appendix e ) . therefore , this allows us to renormalize these operators as before by introducing the same rising and lowering polariton operators @xmath393 such as eq . [ energy5 ] and @xmath394 hold identically . we thus have completed the justification of the milonni s approach for dielectric medium with weak absorption @xcite . + an other remark concerns the longitudinal electric field which was omitted here since it does not play an active role in pulse propagation through the medium . we have indeed @xmath395 so that the reasoning was only done on the transverse modes . however , this was not necessary and one could have kept the longitudinal electric field all along the reasoning . since the transverse part is a constant as we showed before , this should be the case for the longitudinal part as well since @xmath396 is also an integral of motion . now , a reasoning similar to the previous one for transverse waves will lead to the brillouin formula for the longitudinal electric energy : @xmath397 where the longitudinal polariton modes are defined by : @xmath398 in this formalism the longitudinal polariton frequencies @xmath399 are the solutions of @xmath400 ( where losses are again supposed to be weak ) . the commutator can be defined using a method equivalent to eq . [ window ] and we get : @xmath401=\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta_{m , n}\frac{\hbar}{|m_{\alpha , m}|}. \label{windowlong}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath402 . after defining the lowering polariton operator as @xmath403 we thus obtain : @xmath404 as it should be . s approach @xcite leads therefore to an effective justification of longitudinal polaritons as well and this includes the hopfield - fano @xcite model as a limiting case when losses are vanishing outside infinitely narrow absorption bands . + a final important remark should be done since it concerns the general significance of the scattered field ( s ) in the lossless limit . indeed , we see from eq . [ modepolar ] that the transverse mode operators @xmath405 and @xmath405 rigorously vanish in the limit @xmath406 ( this is not true for longitudinal operators . [ modepolarlong ] which are physically linked to bound and coulombian fields ) . in agreement with the sub - section iii c we thus conclude that in the vacuum limit one should consider the @xmath88 fields as the only surviving contribution . however , we also see that for all practical needs if the losses are weak but not equal to zero then by imposing @xmath407 the @xmath88 terms should cancel and only will survive a scattered term which will formally looks as a free photon in a bulk medium with optical index @xmath408 . therefore , we justify the formal canonical quantization procedure used by milonni and others @xcite which reduces to the historical quantization methods in the ( quasi- ) non dispersive limit @xcite . however , this can only be considered as an approximation and therefore the original claim presented in ref . @xcite that the scattered field @xmath90 is sufficient for justifying the exact limit @xmath406 without the @xmath88 term was actually unfounded . as we will see this will become specially relevant when we will generalize the langevin noise approach to an inhomogeneous medium . the central issue in this work is to interpret the physical meaning of quantized polariton modes in the general huttner barnett framework of section ii and this will go far beyond the limiting hopfield - fano @xcite or milonni s approaches @xcite which are valid in restricted conditions when losses and/or dispersion are weak enough . for the present purpose we will focus on the homogeneous medium case ( the most general inhomogeneous medium case is analyzed in the next section ) . it is fundamental to compare the mode structure of eqs . [ rehhd ] , [ rehhe ] , [ rehhepar ] , and [ rehhb ] on the one side and the mode structure of eqs . [ 118 ] , [ 119 ] and [ 120 ] on the other side which are associated respectively with the free modes ` ( 0 ) ' and the scattered modes ` ( s ) ' . the ` ( 0 ) ' modes are the eigenstates of the classical propagation problem when we can cancel the fluctuating term @xmath38 . this is however not allowed in qed since we are now considering operators in the hilbert space and one can not omit these terms without breaking unitarity . inversely the scattered modes are the modes which were considered by huttner and barnett @xcite . moreover only these ` ( s ) ' modes survive here if the initial time @xmath29 is sent into the remote past , i.e. , if @xmath407 . for all operational needs it is therefore justified to omit altogether the ` ( 0 ) ' mode contribution in the homogeneous medium case . clearly , this was the choice made by gruner and welsch @xcite and later by more or less all authors working on the subject ( see however refs . @xcite ) which accepted this rule even for non - homogeneous media . if we accept this axiom then the hamiltonian of the problem seems to reduce to @xmath409 , i.e. in the homogeneous medium case , to @xmath410 which depends only on the fluctuating operators @xmath411 , @xmath412 in agreement with the langevin force / noise approach of gruner and welsch @xcite . + now , there is apparently a paradox : the complete hamiltonian of the system is in agreement with eq . [ 10 ] given by @xmath413 can we show that @xmath52 is actually equivalent to @xmath230 ? this is indeed the case for all practical purposes at least for the homogeneous medium case treated by huttner and barnett@xcite that we analyzed in details before . to see that remember that @xmath52 is actually a constant of motion therefore we should have @xmath414 . this equality reads also @xmath415 . now , the central point here is to use the boundary condition at time @xmath29 which imply @xmath416 . furthermore , since the time evolution of @xmath417 is harmonic we have @xmath418 . altogether these relations imply @xmath419 so that we have : @xmath420 in other words we get a description in which the fock number states associated with the fluctuating operators @xmath177 or equivalently @xmath162 , @xmath411 diagonalize not the full hamiltonian but only a part that we noted @xmath230 . however , this is not problematic since the remaining term @xmath421 is also clearly by definition a constant of motion since it only depends on fields at time @xmath29 . how can we interpret this constant of motion ? we can clearly rewrite it as @xmath422 . therefore , in the @xmath423 potential vector formalism defined in section ii , this constant depends on both @xmath424 and @xmath425 , i. e. , lowering and rising operators associated with the transverse @xmath426 and @xmath427 fields , and it also depends on the operators @xmath428 , @xmath429 which are associated with the fluctuating dipole distribution at the initial time @xmath29 . furthermore since we have also @xmath430 , @xmath431 , @xmath432 and since @xmath433 , @xmath434 we can alternatively write : @xmath435 this means that the remaining term @xmath436 depends on the knowledge of @xmath437 and @xmath438 electromagnetic free field . since in the limit @xmath133 these @xmath88 electromagnetic terms vanish at any finite time @xmath75 this would justify to consider @xmath436 as an inoperative constant . however , we have also the contribution of @xmath439 which play a fundamental role in the determination of @xmath440 , @xmath441 and @xmath442 at the finite time @xmath75 . therefore , while @xmath436 is a constant of motion it nevertheless contains quantities which will affect the evolution of the surviving @xmath90 fields at time @xmath75 . it is for this reason that we can say that for ` all practical purposes only ' @xmath436 is unnecessary and that @xmath230 is sufficient for describing the energy problem . + there are however many remarks to be done here concerning this analysis . first , while the hamiltonian @xmath230 gives a good view of the energy up to an additive inoperative constant it is the full hamiltonian which is necessary for deriving the equations of motions from hamilton s equations or equivalently from heisenberg s evolution like @xmath443 $ ] . it is also only with @xmath52 that time symmetry is fully preserved . in particular do not forget that in deriving the fano - hopfield @xcite formalism we introduced ( see eq . [ g ] ) the evolution @xmath444 which depends on the causal ` in ' field @xmath445 and on the causal permittivity @xmath257 . since the knowledge of @xmath446 is equivalent to @xmath91 in the limit @xmath447 the ( forward ) laplace transform method is leading to the same result that the usual fano method and this fits as well with the gruner and welsch langevin s equations @xcite . however , instead of eq . [ g ] we could equivalently use the anticausal equation @xmath448 where @xmath449 replaces @xmath449 and where the causal permittivity @xmath257 becomes now @xmath450 which is associated with amplification instead of the usual dissipation . the green integral equation now becomes @xmath451 where @xmath208 replaces @xmath452 ( see eq . [ 20bis ] ) and is associated with the anticausal dynamics which is connected to the time - reversed evolution . both formalism developed with either ` in ' or ` out ' fields are completely equivalent but this shows that we have the freedom to express the scattered field in term of @xmath453 , and @xmath454 or in term of @xmath455 , and @xmath456 . since there is in general no fully propagative ` free ' electromagnetic modes ( if we exclude the lossless medium limit considered by hopfield and fano @xcite ) then the surviving fields at finite time @xmath75 obtained either with @xmath133 or @xmath457 correspond to decaying or growing waves in agreement with the results discussed for the laplace transform methods . the full hamiltonian @xmath52 is thus expressed equivalently either as @xmath458 ( with @xmath459 the fluctuating field defined in section ii ) or as @xmath460 with @xmath461 the fluctuating field using using a final boundary condition at time @xmath222 . in the limits @xmath133 , @xmath457 this leads to @xmath462 or @xmath463 where the remaining terms ( see eq . [ rema ] ) @xmath464 and @xmath465 are two different integrals of motion . therefore , it shows that the representation chosen by gruner and welsch in ref . @xcite is not univocal and that one could reformulate all the theory in terms of @xmath449 instead of @xmath445 to respect time symmetry . furthermore , we emphasize that while the two hamiltonians @xmath466 and @xmath467 have formally the same mathematical structure they are not associated with the same physical electromagnetic fields since eq . [ glopiglopa ] and eq . [ outoftime ] corresponds respectively to decaying and growing radiated fields . causality therefore requires to make a choice between two different representations . it is only the choice on a boundary condition in the remote past or future together with thermodynamical considerations which allow us to favor the decaying regime given by eq . [ glopiglopa ] . + a different but related point to be discussed here concerns the hopfield - fano limit @xcite for which the general conductivity like @xmath468 leads to quasi - lossless permittivity ( see eq . [ dangerous ] ) . in this regime we found that an exact diagonalization procedure can be handled out leading to genuine transverse and longitudinal polaritons . these exceptions also fit with the time - symmetry considerations discussed previously since the quasi - absence of absorption makes the problem much more time symmetrical that in the cases where the only viable representations involve either @xmath449 or @xmath445 . of course the hopfield - fano model is an idealization which , in the context of the huttner - barnett framework , gets a clear physical interpretation only as an approximation for low - loss media , as explained in section iii g. + this leads us to a new problem , which is certainly the most important in the present work : considering the vacuum limit @xmath469 discussed after eq . [ 120 ] we saw that only the @xmath88 electromagnetic modes survive in this regime and that the @xmath90 modes are killed together with @xmath470 . these vacuum modes are completely decoupled from the undamped mechanical oscillators motion @xmath471 . in this limit time symmetry is of course respected and we see that the full set of eigenmodes diagonalizing the hamiltonian corresponds to the uncoupled free photons and free mechanical oscillator motions . an other way to see that is to use again the fourier formalism instead of the laplace transform method . from eq . [ g ] we see that in the vacuum limit it is not the scattered field defined by eq . [ glopiglopa ] which survives ( since @xmath470 ) but an additional term corresponding to free space photon modes . while this should be clear after our discussion this point has tremendous consequences if we want to generalize properly the huttner - barnett approach to an inhomogeneous medium . in such a medium the permittivity @xmath472 is position dependent . now , generally speaking in nanophotonics we consider problems where a dissipative object like a metal particle is confined in a finite region of space surrounded by vacuum . the susceptibility @xmath42 therefore vanishes outside the object and we expect electromagnetic vacuum modes associated with free space photon to play a important role in the final analysis . this should contrast with the huttner - barnett case for homogenous medium which supposes an unphysical infinite dissipative medium supporting bulk polaritons or plasmons . the inhomogeneous polariton case will be treated in the next section . in order to deal with the most general situation of polaritons in inhomogeneous media we need first to consider the formal separation between source fields and free - space photon mode . the separation used here is clearly different from the one developed in the previous section since we now consider on the one side as source term the total polarization @xmath473 ( see eq . [ 18 ] ) which includes both the fluctuating term @xmath30 but also the induced polarization @xmath35 and on the other side as source - free terms some general photon modes solutions of maxwell equations in vacuum . in order not to get confused with the previous notations we now label @xmath474 the vacuum modes and @xmath475 the modes induced by the total dipolar distribution @xmath473 . + we start with the second order dynamical equation @xmath476 which can be solved using the method developed for eq . [ 90 ] . indeed , by imposing @xmath477 in eq . [ 90 ] and by replacing @xmath38 by @xmath39 , @xmath134 by @xmath478 , @xmath479 by @xmath480 and so on in the calculations of section iii we can easily obtain the formalism needed . consider first the vacuum fields @xmath478 , @xmath481 and @xmath482 . from eqs . [ 118 ] , [ 119 ] in the limit @xmath126 we get a plane - wave modal expansion for the free photon field which we write in analogy with eq . [ 57b ] as @xmath483 with the modal expansion coefficients @xmath484 showing the harmonic structure of the fields . of course this transverse vacuum field satisfies maxwell s equations without source terms and in particular @xmath485 with @xmath486 . + we now study the scattered - fields @xmath487 , @xmath488 and @xmath489 . like for the calculations presented in section iii for the homogeneous medium case it appears convenient to use the green dyadic formalism which is well adapted for nanophotonics studies in particular for numerical computation of fields in complex dielectric environment where no obvious spatial symmetry are visible . starting with this formalism we get for the @xmath475 electric field : @xmath490 equivalently , by using the inverse laplace transform ( see appendix d for details ) @xmath491 , we obtain in the time domain @xmath492 this analysis implies @xmath493 and therefore we have @xmath494 . + moreover , most studies consider instead of the propagator @xmath495 the dyadic green function @xmath496 which is a solution of @xmath497 and which is actually connected to @xmath495 by @xmath498 . this dyadic green function is very convenient since practical calculations very often involve not the displacement field @xmath426 but the electric field @xmath499 . we obtain : @xmath500 alternatively in the time domain we have for the scattered field @xmath501 : @xmath502 this can rewritten by using the propagator @xmath503 together with eq . [ definiti ] as : @xmath504 finally , we can also use the dyadic formalism to represent the magnetic field @xmath505 . starting from eq . [ 6 ] which yields @xmath506 and therefore @xmath507 where we introduced the definition @xmath508 ( here we used the condition @xmath509 ) . in the time domain we thus directly obtain @xmath510 which yields @xmath511 as expected . + we emphasize here once again the fundamental role played by the boundary conditions at @xmath29 . what we showed is that at the initial time @xmath29 we have @xmath493 and thus @xmath512 which means , by definition of our vacuum modes , @xmath513 . in other words , the electric field associated with vacuum modes equals the total displacement fields at the initial time . this is interesting since it also implies @xmath514 ( which means @xmath515 ) . this can be written after separation into transverse and longitudinal parts as @xmath516 for the transverse ( solenoidal or divergence- free ) components and @xmath517 for the longitudinal ( irrotational or curl - free ) components . . [ gourbi ] is well known in qed since it rigorously agrees with the definition of the longitudinal field obtained in usual coulomb gauge using the @xmath3 potential instead of @xmath423 . untill now we did nt specify the form of the dipole density @xmath473 . the separation between source and free terms for the field was therefore analyzed from a microscopic perspective where the diffracted fields @xmath518 and @xmath505 was generated by the full microscopic current . in order to generalize the description given in section iii for the homogeneous medium we will now use the separation eq . [ 18 ] of @xmath473 into a fluctuating term @xmath30 and an induced contribution @xmath35 of essentially classical origin . using the laplace transform we get @xmath519 . now from the previous section we have therefore for the laplace transform of the electric field the following lippman - schwinger integral equation @xmath520.\nonumber\\ \label{149}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in order to get a meaningful separation of the total field we here define @xmath521 and @xmath522 we have clearly @xmath523 and @xmath524 this allows us to interpret @xmath142 as the green function of the inhomogeneous dielectric medium while @xmath525 is a free solution of maxwell s equation in the dielectric medium in absence of the fluctuating source @xmath153 . by direct replacement of eqs . [ 150 ] and [ 151 ] into [ 149 ] one get @xmath526 meaning that the total field can be seen as the sum of the free solution @xmath525 and of scattering contribution @xmath527 induced by the fluctuating source @xmath153 . + in the time domain we get for the electric field @xmath528 and for the magnetic field @xmath529 which are completed by the constitutive relation : @xmath530 . similarly we obtain for the new propagator : @xmath531\nonumber\\ -\int_{0}^{t}d\tau'\chi(\mathbf{x},\tau')\mathbf{u}_\chi(t-\tau',\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x''})\nonumber\\ \label{156}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we have the important properties @xmath532 , @xmath533 . the total electromagnetic field in the time domain is thus expressed as : @xmath534 @xmath535 with @xmath536 , @xmath537 finally , the constitutive relation for the scattered displacement field @xmath538 reads : @xmath539 . the boundary conditions at @xmath29 together with the field equations determine the full evolution and we have : @xmath540 we point out that the description of the longitudinal field should be treated independently in this formalism since at any time @xmath75 we have the constraint @xmath541 which shows that fluctuating current and field are not independent . more precisely , if we insert the constraint @xmath541 into the lagrangian formalism developed in section ii we get a new effective lagrangian density for the longitudinal field which reads : @xmath542 from eq . [ 2bb ] we get the euler - lagrange equation : @xmath543 with @xmath544 and which agrees with eq . [ 8 ] if the constraint @xmath541 is used . now , the formal solution of eq . [ 8b ] is obtained from eq . [ 17bb ] @xmath545 and allows for a separation between a fluctuating term @xmath546 and a source term @xmath547 . from this we naturally deduce @xmath548 integral eqs . [ 17bb ] or [ dde ] could in principle be solved iteratively in order to find expressions @xmath549 and @xmath550 which are linear functionals of @xmath551 and @xmath552 . alternatively , this can be done self - consistently using the laplace transform of eq . [ dde ] which reads @xmath553 and leads to : @xmath554 in the time domain we have thus @xmath555 with the effective susceptibility defined as@xmath556 we have equivalently for the effective susceptibility @xmath557 . after closing the contour in the complex plane we get @xmath558 where the sum is taken over the longitudinal modes solutions of @xmath559 ( with @xmath560 and @xmath561 by definition ) . the frequencies considered here are in general spatially dependent since the medium is inhomogeneous and are therefore very often difficult to find . in the limit of the homogeneous lossless medium we obtain the hopfield - fano @xcite model . + we emphasize that the present description of the polariton field contrast with the integral solution of eq . [ g ] @xmath444 which was obtained for the homogeneous medium : @xmath562 and which included only a scattering contribution @xmath90 due to the cancellation of the @xmath88 term for @xmath133 . here , we can not neglect or cancel the @xmath88 mode solutions since in general the medium is not necessary lossy at spatial infinity . this will be in particular the case for all scattering problems involving a localized system such as a metal or dielectric antenna supporting plasmon - polariton localized modes . however , mostly all studies , inspirited by the success of the huttner - barnett model @xcite for the homogeneous lossy medium , and following the langevin - noise method proposed gruner and welsch @xcite , neglected or often even completely omitted the contribution of the @xmath88 modes . still , these @xmath88 modes are crucial for preserving the unitarity of the full matter field dynamics and can not be rigorously omitted . only in those case where absorption is present at infinity we can omit the @xmath88 modes . + to clarify this point further consider a medium made of a spatially homogeneous background susceptibility @xmath563 and of a localized susceptibility @xmath564 such as @xmath565 at spatial infinity . the electromagnetic field propagating into the medium with total permittivity @xmath566 can be thus formally developed using the lippeman - schwinger equation as : @xmath567.\nonumber\\ = \overline{\mathbf{e}'}^{(1)}(\mathbf{x},p ) -\int d^3\mathbf{x ' } \frac{p^2}{c^2}\mathbf{g}_{\chi_1}(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x'},ip)\nonumber\\ \cdot [ \bar{\chi_2}(\mathbf{x}',p)\overline{\mathbf{e}'}(\mathbf{x},p)+\overline{\mathbf{p}'}^{(0)}(\mathbf{x'},p)].\nonumber\\\label{154bb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have defined a new background free field @xmath568 and a new green dyadic tensor for the background medium @xmath569 we have naturally @xmath570 and similarly @xmath571 . + importantly , in the time domain we can write : @xmath572\nonumber\\ -\mathbf{p}^{(0)}(\mathbf{x},t)+\int_{0}^{t}d\tau\chi_2(\mathbf{x},\tau)\textbf{e}(\mathbf{x},t-\tau).\nonumber\\ \label{15bbb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can check that we have @xmath573 . moreover , since from eq . [ 150b ] ( written in the time domain ) we have @xmath574 and since @xmath575 , we deduce that at the initial time @xmath29 @xmath576 as it should be to agree with the general formalism presented in section iv a. + now , since the background dissipative medium is not spatially bound the @xmath577 field associated with damped modes will vanish if @xmath133 as explained before . we could therefore be tempted @xcite to eliminate from the start @xmath577 and thus get in the laplace transform language the effective formula : @xmath578\nonumber\\ = -\int d^3\mathbf{x ' } \frac{p^2}{c^2}\mathbf{g}_{\chi}(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x'},ip)\cdot\overline{\mathbf{p}'}^{(0)}(\mathbf{x'},p ) ] . \label{154bbb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with the total green dyadic function @xmath579 obeying to eq . [ 152 ] with the total permittivity @xmath566 . it is straightforward to check that @xmath580 satisfies also eq . [ 151 ] so that it is the same green function . + however , removing @xmath577 from the start in eq . [ 15bbb ] would mean that the boundary conditions at the initial time @xmath29 have been obliviated since we should now necessarily have @xmath581 . this corresponds to a very specific boundary condition which is certainly allowed in classical physics ( where we can put @xmath582 ) but which in the quantum formalism means that we break the unitarity of the evolution . to say it differently , it means that in the langevin noise formalism @xcite the photon field @xmath423 is not anymore an independent canonical contribution to the evolution since all electromagnetic fields are induced by the material part . the green formalism presented by gruner and welsch @xcite , and abundantly used since @xcite , represents therefore an alternative theory which rigorously speaking is not equivalent , contrary to the claim in refs . @xcite , to the lagrangian formalism discussed in section ii for the general huttner - barnett model @xcite . our analysis , as already explained in the introduction , agrees with the general studies made in the 1970 s and 1980 s in qed @xcite since one must include with an equal footings both the field and matter fluctuations in a self consistent qed in order to preserve rigorously unitarity and causality . + two issues are important to emphasize here . first , observe that in the limit where the background susceptibility @xmath583 vanishes then the term @xmath584 in general does not cancel at any time , and therefore the coupling to photonic modes can not be omitted even in practice from the evolution at finite time @xmath75 . this is is particularly important in nanophotonics where an incident exiting photon field interact with a localized nano - antenna . it is therefore crucial to analyze further the impact of our findings on the quantum dynamics of polaritons in presence of sources such as quantum fluorescent emitters . this will the subject of a subsequent article . + the second issue concerns the hamiltonian definition in the new formalism . indeed , the definition of the full system hamiltonian @xmath52 was previously given for the homogeneous medium case in section iii g. we showed ( see eq . [ 158o ] ) that @xmath52 is given by @xmath585 where @xmath230 is the material hamiltonian defined in eq . [ 30c ] and which depends only on the free mode operators @xmath156 , @xmath157 . this @xmath586 is the hamiltonian considered by the noise langevin approach and the remaining term ( see eq . [ rema ] ) @xmath587 is an additional constant of motion . this constant proved to be irrelevant for all practical purposes since the only surviving electromagnetic fields ( i.e. if @xmath133 ) are the induced @xmath90 modes which are generated by the fluctuating dipole density @xmath30 ( see however the different remarks concerning time symmetry at the end of section iii g ) . now , for the inhomogeneous problem the complete reasoning leading to eq . [ 158ob ] is still rigorously valid . the main difference being that in general the constant of motion @xmath587 is not irrelevant at all since the @xmath88 electromagnetic modes are not in general vanishing even if @xmath133 . + in order to clarify this point we should now physically interpret the term @xmath436 . we first start with the less relevant term in optics : the longitudinal polariton . indeed , the longitudinal field is here decoupled from the rest and evolves independently using the lagrangian density @xmath588 defined in eq . [ 2bb ] ( this should not be necessarily true if the polaritons are coupled to external sources such as fluorescent emitters ) . we thus get the following hamiltonian @xmath589:.\nonumber\\ \label{2c}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath590 is a constant of motion and can used ( with the hamiltonian formalism ) to deduce the evolution equation ( see eq . [ 8b ] ) and the solution eq . [ 17bb ] . since @xmath590 is a constant of motion we have @xmath591 and from the form of the solution we obtain the equivalent formula @xmath592 . \label{2d}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have clearly by definition @xmath593and thus @xmath594 ( with @xmath595 ) . while @xmath596 is a constant of motion it is not irrelevant here since the equivalence of eq . [ 2c ] and eq . [ 2d ] leads to the complete solution eq . [ 17bb ] for @xmath597 . oppositely , taking @xmath598 and omitting @xmath596 would lead to the free solution @xmath599 in contradiction with the dynamical law . this again stresses the importance of keeping all contributions in the evolution and hamiltonian . + in order to analyze the transverse field hamiltonian we should comment further on the difference between the description using the @xmath423 potential used in this work and the most traditional treatment using the * a * potential ( in the coulomb gauge ) . indeed , by analogy with the separation between @xmath475 and @xmath474 modes discussed in section vi a we can using the * a * potential vector representation get a separation between free - space modes @xmath600 and source field @xmath601 . here , we label these modes by an additional prime for reasons which will become clear below . first , the source field contribution @xmath602 is given by @xmath603 and with by definition @xmath604 . importantly we have @xmath605 meaning also @xmath606 . the free - space modes @xmath607 are easily obtained using a plane wave expansion as @xmath608 where @xmath609 . using the @xmath3 potential we therefore get for the free electromagnetic fields : @xmath610 these transverse fields satisfy maxwell s equation in vacuum like the free - fields given by eq . [ 121 ] do as well . however , it should now be clear that this two sets of free - fields given either by eq . [ 140nnn ] or eq . [ 121 ] are not equivalent . to see that we must express the source field @xmath611 . the longitudinal contribution @xmath612 is given by the usual instantaneous coulomb field @xmath613 since there is no other longitudinal contribution this leads to @xmath614 which is eq . [ gourbi ] . as mentioned already this is the usual result . however the most important term here is the transverse source field : @xmath615 . we get for this term @xmath616 which is also written as : @xmath617 equivalently we have in the frequency domain : @xmath618 \nonumber\\ \label{143}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this transverse scattered field vanishes at @xmath29 : @xmath619 and therefore at this initial time it differs by an amount @xmath620 from the scattered field given by eq . we thus get @xmath621 . importantly , by comparing eq . [ 136 ] and eq . [ 144 ] we obtain a relation for the free - space modes in the two representations using either the @xmath423 or @xmath3 potential vectors : @xmath622 this is reminiscent from the relation @xmath623 . it shows that while the two fields @xmath624 and @xmath625 are solutions of the same maxwell s equations in vacuum they are not defined by the same initial conditions . we must therefore be extremely careful when dealing with the modes in order not to get confused with the solutions chosen . we also mention that the scattered magnetic field @xmath626 is given by @xmath627 or equivalently by @xmath628 in the frequency domain this gives : @xmath629 a comparison with the formulas obtained in the subsection vi a shows that @xmath630 differs from @xmath505 but that at time @xmath29 both vanish so that @xmath631 . it implies that @xmath632 so that while @xmath633 differs from @xmath634 for @xmath635 they become equal at the initial time @xmath29 . again , this stresses the difference between the representations based either on @xmath423 or @xmath3 . + now , this description using @xmath3 leads to a clear interpretation of @xmath636 . indeed , at time @xmath29 only the @xmath607 solution survives for the transverse part of the field . importantly , the set of free - space solutions @xmath607 actually depends on lowering and rising operators @xmath637 , @xmath638 defined such that @xmath639=\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta_{j , k}$ ] and @xmath640 with @xmath641 . therefore , by a reasoning similar to the one leading to eq . [ 158o ] we deduce @xmath642 we clearly here get a physical interpretation of the remaining term @xmath643 as a energy sum over the transverse photon modes propagating in free space . these free photons are calculated using the @xmath3 potential vector . from eq . [ 145 ] we know that these modes differ in general from those in the @xmath423 potential vector since @xmath644 is not identical to @xmath645 unless the polarization density @xmath646 cancels ( which is the case in vacuum ) . + now , in classical physics the meaning of expansion eq . [ energytransverse ] is clear : it corresponds to a diagonalization of the hamiltonian in term of normal coordinates , i.e. , like for classical mechanics @xcite , and similarly to the huang , fano , hopfield procedure for polaritons @xcite . in qed the problem is different since , as explained in details in ref . @xcite fields like @xmath647 and @xmath648 ( and their hermitian conjugate variables ) do not commute , unlike it is for @xmath649 and @xmath648 . it is thus not possible to find common eigenstates of the @xmath650 operators for photons ( in the usual representation ) and for @xmath651 associated with the material fluctuations . this is not true for the representation using @xmath652 and @xmath651 operators but now the full hamiltonian is not fully diagonalized as seen from eq . [ 158ob ] . only if one neglect the remaining term @xmath436 , like it was done in refs . @xcite , can we diagonalize the hamiltonian . however , then we get the troubles concerning unitarity , causality and time symmetry discussed along this manuscript . the general formalism discussed in this article using the @xmath423 potential provide a natural way for dealing with qed in dispersive and dissipative media . it is based on a canonical quantization procedure generalizing the early work of huttner and barnett @xcite for polaritons in homogeneous media . the method is unambiguous as far as we conserve all terms associated with free photons @xmath653 and material fluctuations @xmath346 for describing the quantum evolution . in particular , in order to preserve the full unitarity and the time symmetry of the coupled system of equations we have to include in the evolution terms associated with fluctuating electromagnetic modes @xmath319 , @xmath320 which have a classical interpretation as polariton eigenmodes and can not in general be omitted if the medium is spatially localized in vacuum . we also discussed alternative representation based on the potential @xmath3 instead of @xmath423 . at the end both representations are clearly equivalent and could be used for generalizing the present theory to other linear media including tensorial anisotropy , magnetic properties , and constitutive equations coupling @xmath654 and @xmath655 ( magneto / electric media ) . moreover , the most important finding of the present article concerns the comparisons between the generalized huttner - barnett approach , advocated here , which involves both photonic and material independent degrees of freedom , and the langevin - noise method proposed initially by gruner and welsch @xcite which involves only the material degrees of freedom associated with fluctuating currents . we showed that rigorously speaking the langevin - noise method is not equivalent to the full hamiltonian qed evolution coupling photonic and material fields . only in the regime where the dissipation of the bulk surrounding medium is non vanishing at spatial infinity could we , i.e. , for all practical purposes , identify the two theories . however , even with such assumptions the langevin noise model is breaking time - symmetry since it considers only decaying modes while the full hamiltonian theory used in our work accepts also growing waves associated with anti - thermodynamic processes . we claim that this is crucial in nanophotonics / plasmonics where quantum emitters , spatially localized , are coupled to photonic and material modes available in the complex environment , e.g. , near nano - antennas in vacuum ( i.e. in a spatial domain where losses are vanishing at infinity ) . since most studies consider the interaction between molecules or quantum - dots and plasmon / polaritons using the langevin noise approach we think that it is urgent to clarify and clean up the problem by analyzing the coupling regime using the full hamiltonian evolution advocated in the present work . finally , we suggest that this work could impact the interpretation and discussion of pure qed effects such as the casimir force or the lamb shift which are strongly impacted by polariton and plasmon modes . all this will be the subject for future works and therefore the present detailed analysis is expected to play an important role in nanophotonics and plasmonics for both the classical and quantum regimes . this work was supported by agence nationale de la recherche ( anr ) , france , through the sinphonie ( anr-12-nano-0019 ) and placore ( anr-13-bs10 - 0007 ) grants . the author gratefully acknowledges several discussions with g. bachelier . the relation @xmath656 admits zeros @xmath100 as postulated in the text . writing @xmath45 one of such zero and @xmath657 the condition eq . [ b1 ] means : @xmath658 from which we deduce after eliminating @xmath659 @xmath660 therefore a necessary but not sufficient condition for having zeros is that if @xmath661 for such a zero then @xmath662 while if @xmath663 then @xmath662 . actually we also see from eq . [ b2 ] that the zero are allowed to be located along the real or imaginary axis of the complex @xmath14 plane if @xmath664 along these axes . this is in general not possible for a large class of permittivity function . consider for example the quite general causal permittivity , i.e. , satisfying the kramers - krnig relation , defined by : @xmath665 with @xmath666 . then we have also @xmath667 clearly , @xmath668 if @xmath669 and @xmath670 in contradiction with the necessary condition for zeros existence mentioned before . this reasoning is valid in one quarter plane but now , if @xmath671 is a zero @xmath672 is also a zero . therefore , the absence of a zero in the quarter plane @xmath669 , @xmath670 implies the absence of zero in the second quarter plane @xmath673 , @xmath670 and therefore eq . [ b1 ] do not admit any zero in the upper half plane for a very usual permittivity like eq . [ b3 ] . actually , the case @xmath674 should be handled separately . we find from eq . [ b4 ] that for such value @xmath664 . this is acceptable in order to have a zero existence in agreement with eq . however , from eq . [ b2 ] we find also that if a zero exists along the axis @xmath674 then we should have as well @xmath675 . this is in contradiction with eq . [ b4 ] which implies @xmath676 . this completes the proof for the permittivity given by eq . + the question concerning the generality of the proof is however still handling . huttner and barnett mentioned the existence of such a proof in the landau and lifschitz text - book @xcite but has no solution in the upper frequency half - plane ( see refs . @xcite).,width=309 ] it is relevant to detail the missing proof here . in order to get the complete result we will use a method used by landau and lifshitz ( see ref . @xcite p. 380 ) . in the complex @xmath14-plane we define @xmath677 . from the properties of @xmath678 we deduce @xmath679 . this implies that @xmath680 is real along the imaginary axis and that @xmath681 and @xmath682 along the real axis . furthermore due to causality we have @xmath683 and therefore @xmath684 if @xmath669 along the real axis . now we consider the closed contour integral ( see fig . 1 ) @xmath685 along @xmath686 made of the real axis and of the semi circle @xmath687 of infinite radius @xmath688 in the upper half plane . however , @xmath689 is a real number and since @xmath680 is not real along the real axis there is no pole along @xmath686 unless @xmath689 is infinite or null . therefore , since @xmath680 is analytical in the upper half plane eq . [ b5 ] gives the numbers of zeros of @xmath690 in this half space . + we then rewrite eq . [ b5 ] as an integral in the complex @xmath691 : @xmath692 where @xmath693 is the image of @xmath686 along the mapping @xmath694 . in particular the origin @xmath695 is mapped on it self while the semi circle of radius @xmath696 is mapped onto the circle of radius @xmath697 . the half real axis @xmath698 corresponding to @xmath351 is mapped onto a complex curve located in the upper half plane of the complex @xmath680-space ( since @xmath699 along this half line ) . similarly , the second half axis @xmath700 is mapped in the lower half plane . as shown on the figure if @xmath701 then the contour integral omits the point @xmath702 and there is no pole involved in the integral which therefore vanishes . we thus deduce that eq . [ b1 ] has no solution in the upper half - plane in the @xmath14 space which is the proof needed . the calculation of @xmath93 defined by the bromwich integral eq . [ 95 ] for @xmath703 : @xmath704 can be handled after closing the contour integral in the lower plane . however , since @xmath389 is not analytical in such lower plane we must include the poles @xmath100 ( all located in the lower plane see appendix a ) , i.e. the residues , in the integral . we use the separation : @xmath705\nonumber\\ \label{96}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and express it as a function of @xmath706 near each poles ( i.e , in the limit @xmath707 ) . we get : @xmath708 from the condition @xmath104 and the equality @xmath709 we then get for @xmath703 after integration in the lower plane eq . [ 98 ] and @xmath106 for @xmath97 ( after integration in the upper plane where no pole are present ) . the value at @xmath108 deserves some careful analysis . indeed , if @xmath108 the integration along the semicircle do not vanish exponentially with it radius @xmath696 and if we choose to integrate in the upper half plane ( where there is no pole ) we get @xmath710 if @xmath688 since @xmath711 in this limit in the upper half plane . therefore we have indeed @xmath712 and the function is continuous at @xmath108 . of course the null value for negative time @xmath713 have no meaning since the laplace transform is only interested in the evolution for positive time . + this leads to the sum rule : @xmath714=0.\label{101}\end{aligned}\]]this leads to the sum rule : @xmath714=0.\label{99}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the free term @xmath110 is defined as @xmath715e^{p(t - t_0)}}{\omega_\alpha^2+(1+\bar{\chi}(p))p^2}\nonumber\\ = u_\alpha(t - t_0)\dot{q}_{\alpha , j}(t_0)+\dot{u}_\alpha(t - t_0)q_{\alpha , j}(t_0)\nonumber\\ \label{102}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath716 like for @xmath113 we get @xmath717 . the last line of eq . [ 102 ] is therefore justified from the fact that the laplace transform of @xmath718 is @xmath719 . now , the boundary condition at @xmath115 imposes @xmath117 . therefore , from eq . [ 103 ] we deduce the second sum rule : @xmath720=1.\label{104}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the value at @xmath108 is not defined univocally since @xmath718 defined through the bromwich integral of @xmath721 is discontinuous . we point out that considering a direct integration at @xmath108 could lead to contradictions since the integration along @xmath722 do not vanish . if we choose to integrate in the upper half plane ( where there is no pole ) we get @xmath723 if @xmath688 since @xmath711 in this limit in the upper half plane . we would get @xmath724 ( a similar calculation could be done in the lower space including poles and residues and we would obtain once again @xmath725 ) . here we considered carefully the limit to prevent us from such a contradiction . the source field can be written as : @xmath726 . after some algebras we get : @xmath727 where we introduced the green function:@xmath728 computed by contour integration in the complex plane and solution of @xmath729 . of course , along the real axis @xmath730 we get @xmath731 which is the usual green function for an homogenous medium . we can also write this field without introducing @xmath14 by using the green propagator @xmath732 which leads to : @xmath733 we have also @xmath734 which represent the generalization of retarded propagator expansion for a lossy and dispersive medium . the role of causality is here crucial since the modes are always damped when the time is growing in the future direction as expected from pure thermodynamical considerations . this means in particular that @xmath735 tends to vanish exponentially as @xmath75 goes to infinity . importantly , in the vacuum limit ( @xmath126 ) we get naturally @xmath736 and in the limit @xmath407 we obtain the retarded potential @xmath737 however , in the vacuum limit we have also : @xmath738 therefore @xmath739 actually vanishes and we get in this limit @xmath740 as it should be . now , from eq . [ 105 ] and from the field definition we easily get the integral formulas for @xmath741 and @xmath742 : @xmath743 these equations have a clear interpretation in term of generalized hertz potentials . in particular , taking the limit @xmath176 and using the properties of convolutions , together with the fact that @xmath744 , we get @xmath745 with @xmath746 by rewriting @xmath747 in eq . [ cool ] we get after some rearrangements : @xmath748}{p^2(1+\bar{\chi}(p))}\label{137}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which involves the scalar green function defined in eq . [ 104 ] and from @xmath749 @xmath750\nonumber\\+ \mathbf{i}\delta^{3}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'})\label{138}\end{aligned}\ ] ] these formulas must be taken carefully since they are not actually valid at the source location , i.e. , if @xmath751 due to the bad convergence of the series defining the dyadic green function . after regularization we can obtain the result @xmath752\nonumber\\ + \frac{c^2}{p^2(1+\bar{\chi}(p))}\mathbf{l}\delta^{3}(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'})\label{139}\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath753\label{140}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath754 a dyadic term depending on the way we define the principal value @xcite : @xmath755 for a small exclusion spherical volume surrounding the point @xmath756 we get @xmath757 , i.e. , the depolarization field predicted by the clausius - mosotti formula @xcite . + in the particular case @xmath477 we write @xmath758 and similarly for other green functions . we also consider the time evolution which in vacuum relies on the propagators @xmath759 explicit calculations lead to : @xmath760 and similarly for the transverse part of @xmath761 : @xmath762 while for the longitudinal part we get : @xmath763 we deduce automatically the boundary conditions @xmath764 . we also obtain @xmath765 and @xmath766 from which we obtain the boundary condition : @xmath767 . we thus obtain : @xmath768 finally , from eq . [ 139 ] we find explicitly for the time dependent @xmath769 field : @xmath770.\label{a16}\end{aligned}\ ] ] from eq . [ b ] we deduce in the hopfield model @xmath771 this leads to the solution @xmath772 and therefore to @xmath773 where the permittivity is given by the lossless lorentz - drude formula @xmath774 . for the transverse fields we expand the different fields as @xmath775 with @xmath776 and @xmath777 . now , we write @xmath294 with @xmath295 a transverse vector field . we thus have @xmath778 with @xmath779 . we thus get the equation @xmath780 near the singularities @xmath781 we get : @xmath782\widetilde{e}_{\alpha , j}(\omega)=\omega_0 ^ 2\gamma_{\alpha , j}\delta(\omega-\omega_0)\end{aligned}\ ] ] and therefore supposing the regularity ( as for the longitudinal case ) we have @xmath783 . the secular equation @xmath784\widetilde{e}_{\alpha , j,\pm}(\omega)=0 $ ] associated with the transverse modes can be easily solved and this indeed leads to @xmath785 with @xmath786 with @xmath302 an amplitude coefficient for the transverse polariton mode . importantly we again get from the regularity condition @xmath787 and thus @xmath788 like for the longitudinal mode . this implies @xmath789 and from eq . [ reeu ] we get @xmath790 . at the end of the day we obtain the following fields amplitudes @xmath791 and @xmath792 ( using definitions similar to eq . [ defi ] ) . these define the hopfield transformation between the old variables @xmath793 , @xmath794 , @xmath795 , @xmath796 and the new polaritonic variables representing the normal coordinates of the problem @xmath302 and @xmath797 . up to a normalization this is equivalent to the work by hopfield . we start with the amplitude for the transverse polariton field @xmath798 where @xmath366 is a frequency window centered on the polariton pulsation @xmath363:=\omega'_{\alpha , m}$ ] . this field is equivalently written as @xmath799 where @xmath800 is a window function such as @xmath801 if @xmath14 belongs to the interval @xmath366 and @xmath802 otherwise . from the commuting properties of @xmath162 ( see eqs . [ 33 ] and [ commuting ] ) we deduce the commutator : @xmath370=\frac{\hbar}{\pi}\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\delta_{j , l}\nonumber\\ \cdot\int_0^{+\infty } \frac{d\omega\omega^4\tilde{\varepsilon}''(\omega)}{|\omega_\alpha^2-\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)\omega^2|^2 } f_{\alpha , m}(\omega)f_{\beta , n}(\omega)\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath803 . now consider the integral : @xmath804 since for weak losses the integrand is extremely peaked on the value @xmath390 we can write @xmath805 as @xmath806 we use the approximation @xmath807 which is valid near the pole where the conditions @xmath808 approximately holds for transverse polaritons . we thus get @xmath809 with @xmath810 and @xmath811 . and where we used the integral @xmath812 which is easily calculated in the complex plane . from this we finally obtain the commutator of eq . [ window ] . we point out that the result does not explicitly depends on the extension of the frequency windows @xmath366 if losses and dispersion are weak enough to have @xmath813 . + for the longitudinal polariton field we have a similar calculation . starting with the definition : @xmath814 we can calculate the commutator @xmath815 $ ] . we have @xmath401=\frac{\hbar}{\pi}\delta_{\alpha,\beta}\nonumber\\ \cdot \int_0^{+\infty } d\omega\frac{\tilde{\varepsilon}''(\omega)}{|\tilde{\varepsilon}(\omega)|^2 } f_{\alpha , m}(\omega)f_{\beta , n}(\omega)\end{aligned}\ ] ] with again @xmath803 . we have to evaluate the integral @xmath816 which like for the transverse modes in the limit of weak losses and dispersion leads after straightforward calculations to @xmath817from this we deduce the commutator given in eq . [ windowlong ] . jauch and k.m . watson , phys . rev . * 74 * , 950 ( 1948 ) . l. knll , w. vogel , d .- welsch , phys . a * 36 * , 63803 ( 1987 ) . glauber , m. lewenstein , phys . a * 43 * , 467 ( 1991 ) . m. wubs , l.g . suttorp , a. lagendijk , phys . a * 68 * , 013822 ( 2003 ) . p. d. drummond , phys . a * 42 * , 6845 ( 1990 ) . constantinou , o. al - dossary , m. babiker , j. phys . : condens . matter * 5 * , 5581 ( 1993 ) . milonni , j. mod . phys . * 42 * , 1991 ( 1995 ) . o. al - dossary , m. babiker , n. enfati , phys rev . a * 54 * , 2419 ( 1996 ) . j.c . garrison , r.y . chiao , phys . a 70 , 053826 ( 2004 ) . jeffers , n. imoto , r. loudon , phys . a. * 47 * , 3346 ( 1993 ) . s. barnett , j. jeffers , a. gatti , r. loudon , phys . rev . a. * 57 * , 2134 ( 1998 ) . c. genet , a. lambrecht , s. raynaud , phys a. * 67 * , 043811 ( 2003 ) . m. s. tame , c. lee , j. lee , d. ballester , m. paternostro , a. v. zayats , m. s. kim , phys . * 101 * , 190504 ( 2008 ) . d. ballester , m. s. tame , c. lee , j. lee , m. s. kim , phys . rev . a. * 79 * , 053845 ( 2009 ) . d. ballester , m. s. tame , m. s. kim , phys . a. * 82 * , 012325 ( 2010 ) . b. huttner , j.j . baumberg , s. m. barnett , europhys . lett * 16 * , 177 ( 1991 ) . b. huttner , s. m. barnett , phys . a * 46 * , 4306 ( 1992 ) . b. huttner , s. m. barnett , europhys . lett * 18 * , 487 ( 1992 ) . b. huttner , s. m. barnett , r. loudon , phys . lett . * 68 * , 3698 ( 1992 ) . r. matloob , r. loudon , s. m. barnett , j. jeffers , phys . a * 52 * , 4823 ( 1995 ) . r. matloob , r. loudon , phys . a * 53 * , 4567 ( 1996 ) . s. m. barnett , the quantum optics of dielectrics , in quantum fluctuations , lecture 3 , eds . s. reynaud e. giacobino and j. zinn - justin ( elsevier , amsterdam , 1997 ) . u. fano , phys . rev . * 103 * , 1202 ( 1956 ) . j. j. hopfield , phys . rev.*112 * , 1555 ( 1958 ) . k. huang , proc . a * 208 * , 352 ( 1951 ) . m. wubs , l.g . suttorp , phys . a * 63 * , 043809 ( 2001 ) . suttorp , m. wubs , phys . a * 70 * , 013816 ( 2004 ) . l. g. suttorp a. j. van wonderen , europhys . lett * 67 * , 766 ( 2004 ) . l. g. suttorp , j. phys . a : math . theor . * 40 * , 3697 ( 2007 ) . n. a. r. bhat , j. e. sipe , phys . a * 73 * , 063808 ( 2006 ) . a. c. judge , m. j. steel , j. e. sipe , c. m. de sterke , phys . a * 87 * , 033824 ( 2013 ) . t. g. philbin , new j. phys . * 12 * , 123008 ( 2010 ) . t. gruner , d .- welsch , phys . a * 51 * , 3246 ( 1995 ) . t. gruner , d .- welsch , phys . rev . a * 53 * , 1818 ( 1996 ) . m. s. yeung , t. k. gustafson , phys . a * 54 * , 5227 ( 1996 ) . c. cohen - tannoudji , j. dupont - roc , and g. grynberg , atom - photon interactions : basic processes and applications ( john wiley , new york , 1992 ) . c. girard and a. dereux , report on progress in physics * 59 * , 657 ( 1996 ) . l. novotny , and b. hecht , principles of nano - optics , ( cambridge press , london , 2006 ) . e. m. lifshitz , zh . * 29 * , 94 ( 1955 ) [ sov . jetp 2 , 73 ( 1956 ) ] . v. l. ginzburg , theoretical physics and astrophysics ( pergamon , oxford , ny , 1979 ) . s. m. rytov , theory of electrical fluctuations and thermal radiation ( publishing house , academy of sciences , ussr , 1953 ) . h. b. callen and t. a. welton , phys . rev . * 83 * , 34 ( 1951 ) . w. milonni , the quantum vacuum : an introduction to quantum electrodynamics ( academic , san diego , ca , 1994 ) . f. s. s. rosa , d. a. r. davit , p. w. milonni , phys rev . a 81 , 033812 ( 2010 ) . g. s. agarwal , phys . a * 11 * , 230 ( 1975 ) . j. m. wylie , j.e . sipe , phys . a * 30 * , 1185 ( 1984 ) . r. carminati , j. j. greffet , phys . . lett . * 82 * , 1160 ( 1999 ) . j. p. mulet , k. joulain , r. carminati , , j.j . greffet , appl . 78 * , 2931 ( 2001 ) . e. rousseau , a. siria , g. jourdan , nature phot . 3 , 514 , ( 2009 ) . c. henkel , k. joulain , j. p. mulet , j. j. greffet , j. opt . . opt . * 4 * , s109 ( 2002 ) . s. scheel , l. knll , d .- welsch , phys . a * 58 * , 700 ( 1998 ) . h. t. dung , l. knll , d .- welsch , phys . a * 57 * , 3931 ( 1998 ) . h. t. dung , l. knll , d .- welsch , phys . a * 62 * , 053804 ( 2000 ) . l. knll , s. scheel , d .- welsch , qed in dispersing and absorbing media , in coherence and statistics of photons and atoms , chap . 1 , ed . j. perina ( wiley , new - york , 2001 ) . r. matloob , phys . a * 60 * , 50 ( 1999 ) . r. matloob , phys . a * 69 * , 052110 ( 2004 ) . r. fermani , s. scheel , p. l. knight , phys . a * 73 * , 032902 ( 2006 ) . c. raabe , s. scheel , d .- welsch , phys . a * 75 * , 053813 ( 2007 ) . m. amooshahi , f. kheirandish , j. phys . a : math . theor . * 41 * , 275402 ( 2008 ) . s. scheel , s.y . buhmann , acta phys . slovaca * 58 * , 675 ( 2008 ) . d. dzotjan , a. s. sorensen , m. fleschhauer , phys . rev . b * 82 * , 075427 ( 2010 ) . d. martin - cano , a. gonzalez - tudela , l. martin - moreno , f. j. garcia - vidal , c. tejedor , e. moreno , phys . b * 84 * , 235306 ( 2011 ) . t. hummer , f.j . garcia - vidal , l. martin . moreno , d. zueco , phys . b * 87 * , 115419 ( 2013 ) . x. w. chen , v. sandoghdar , m. agio , phys . lett . * 110 * , 153605 ( 2013 ) . a. delga , j. feist , j. bravo - abad , f. j. garcia vidal , j. opt . 16 , 114018 ( 204 ) . j. hakami , l. wang , m. s. zubairy , phys . a * 89 * , 053835 ( 2014 ) . choquette , k. p. marzlin , phys . a * 85 * , 063841 ( 2012 ) . a. l. grimsmo , a. h. vaskinn , p. k. rekdal , b. s. k. skagerstam , phys . a * 87 * , 022101 ( 2013 ) . b. rousseaux , d. dzsotjan , g. colas des francs , h. r. jauslin , c. couteau , s. guerin , phys . rev . b * 93 * , 045422 ( 2016 ) . i. r. senitzky , phys . lett . * 31 * , 955 ( 1973 ) . j. r. ackerhalt , p. l. knight , j. h. eberly , phys . lett . * 30 * , 456 ( 1973 ) . p. w. milonni , j. r. ackerhalt , w. a.smith , phys . 31 * , 958 ( 1973 ) . j. dalibard , j. dupont - roc , c. cohen - tannoudji , j. physique * 43 * , 1617 ( 1982 ) . milonni , phys . a * 82 * , 225 ( 1981 ) . a. drezet , phys . a * 94 * , 053826 ( 2016 ) . c. cohen - tannoudji , j. dupont - roc , and g. grynberg , photons and atoms : an introduction to quantum electrodynamics ( john wiley , new york , 1989 ) . e. power , s. zienau , phi . a251 , 427 ( 1959 ) . r. zwanzig , nonequilibrium statistical mechanics ( oxford university press , oxford , 2001 ) . o. d. stefano , s. savasta , r. girlanda , phys . rev . a * 61 * , 023803 ( 2000 ) . s. savasta , o. d. stefano , r. girlanda , phys . a * 65 * , 043801 ( 2002 ) . m. khanbekyan , l. kn'oll , d .- welsch , phys . a * 67 * , 063812 ( 2003 ) . m. khanbekyan , l. kn'oll , d .- welsch , a. a. semenov , w. vogel , phys . a * 72 * , 053813 ( 2005 ) . j. d. jackson , classical electrodynamics 3rd . ( j. wiley and sons , new york , 1999 ) . j. a. wheeler , r. p. feynman , rev . * 21 * , 425 ( 1949 ) p. c. w. davies , the physics of time asymmetry ( the university of california press , berkeley , 1974 ) . d. zeh , the physical basis of the direction of time ( springer , berlin - heldeberg , 2007 ) . h. goldstein , c. p. poole jr . , j. l. safko , classical mechanics 3 rd . ( addison wesley , 2001 ) . for the lorentz drude model we have the conductivity @xmath825 which equals @xmath826 defined in section ii for @xmath827 . now , in the huttner barnet model we introduce therefore a singular coefficient @xmath828 in the definition eq . [ 5 ] of the dipole density . in order to have finite quantity and to omit the use of the square root of a dirac function we define @xmath829 in order to have @xmath830 . the mechanical lagrangian ( see eq . [ 2 ] ) becomes @xmath831 in agreement with hopfield . this leads to the mechanical and electromagnetic evolution equations discussed in the main text . more precisely we have near the singularity @xmath781 the condition @xmath832 . if we suppose @xmath278 to be regular we get the result discussed in the text . if @xmath278 is singular then @xmath833 would be even more singular and this would contradict the equation . therefore regularity at @xmath282 must be imposed . s. t. ho , p. kumar , j. opt . b * 10 * , 1620 ( 1993 ) . f. tassone , f. bassani , l. c. andreani , il nuovo cimento d * 12 * , 1673 ( 1990 ) . d. gerace , l. c. andreani , phys . b * 75 * , 235325 ( 2007 ) . g. juzeliunas , phys . a * 53 * , 3543 ( 1996 ) . y. todorov , phys . b * 89 * , 075115 ( 2014 ) . y. todorov , phys . b * 91 * , 125409 ( 2015 ) . m.d . tokman , m. a. erukhimova , v.v . vdovin , ann . phys * 360 * , 571 ( 2015 ) . l. brillouin , wave propagation and group velocity ( academic press , new york,1960 ) j. yang , m. perrin , p. lalanne , phys . rev . x * 5 * , 021008 ( 2015 ) . a. archambault , f. marquier , j. j. greffet , phys . b * 82 * , 035411 ( 2010 ) . Abstract:
[ "in this article we provide a general analysis of canonical quantization for polaritons in dispersive and dissipative electromagnetic inhomogeneous media . we compare several approaches based either on the huttner barnett model [ b. huttner , s. m. barnett , phys . rev . a * 46 * , 4306 ( 1992 ) ] or the green function , langevin noise method [ t. gruner , d .- g . welsch , phys . rev . a * 53 * , 1818 ( 1996 ) ] which includes only material oscillators as fundamental variables . we show that in order to preserve unitarity , causality and time symmetry one must necessarily include with an equal footing both electromagnetic modes and material fluctuations in the evolution equations . this becomes particularly relevant for all nanophotonics and plasmonics problems involving spatially localized antennas or devices ." ]
19,374
19,374
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: @xmath3 after totally geodesic @xmath4-spheres , clifford tori represent the next simplest minimal embeddings of closed surfaces in the round unit @xmath1-sphere @xmath5 . in fact marques and neves @xcite , in their proof of the willmore conjecture , have identified clifford tori as the unique area minimizers among all embedded closed minimal surfaces of genus at least one , and brendle @xcite has shown they are the only embedded minimal tori , affirming a conjecture of lawson . the first examples of higher - genus minimal surfaces in @xmath5 were produced by lawson himself @xcite , and further examples were found later by karcher , pinkall , and sterling @xcite . both constructions proceed by solving plateau s problem for suitably chosen boundary and extending the solution to a closed surface by reflection . in this article we carry out certain constructions by using gluing techniques by singular perturbation methods . one begins with a collection of known embedded minimal surfaces . these ingredients are then glued together to produce a new embedded surface , called the initial surface , having small but nonvanishing mean curvature introduced in gluing . the construction is successful when the initial surfaces are close to a singular limit . the construction is then completed by perturbing the surface to minimality without sacrificing embeddedness . of course the size of the mean curvature and the feasibility of perturbing the surface so as to eliminate it both depend crucially on the design of the initial surface . gluing methods have been applied extensively and with great success in gauge theories by donaldson , taubes , and others . in many geometric problems similar to the one studied in this article obstructions appear to solving the linearized equation . an extensive methodology has been developed to deal with this difficulty in a large class of geometric problems , starting with @xcite , @xcite and with further refinements in @xcite . we refer to @xcite for a general discussion of this gluing methodology and @xcite for a detailed general discussion of doubling and desingularization constructions for minimal surfaces . in this article , however , we limit ourselves to constructions of unusually high symmetry ( except in section [ further ] ) and this way we avoid these difficulties entirely . the first desingularization construction by gluing methods for minimal surfaces with intersection curves which are not straight lines was carried out in @xcite and serves as a prototype ( see for example @xcite ) for desingularizations of rotationally invariant surfaces with transverse intersections without triple or higher points . ( an independent construction by traizet @xcite has straight lines as intersections . ) for one earlier application of the gluing methodology in the context of minimal surfaces in @xmath5 see @xcite , where a `` doubling '' construction of the clifford torus is carried out ; this work has been extended in @xcite for `` stackings '' of the clifford torus and in @xcite for doublings of the equatorial two - sphere . the present construction also glues tori , but by desingularization rather than doubling . the idea of a desingularization construction for intersecting minimal surfaces in a riemannian three - manifold is to start with a collection of minimal surfaces intersecting along some curves and to produce a single embedded minimal surface by desingularizing the curves of intersection . assuming transverse intersection , this is accomplished , at the level of the initial surface , through the replacement of a tubular neighborhood of each component curve of the intersection set by a surface which on small scales approximates a minimal surface in euclidean space desingularizing the intersection of a collection of planes along a single line . in prior desingularization constructions the appropriate models for these desingularizing surfaces were furnished by the classical scherk towers of @xcite , which desingularize the intersection of two planes . one novelty of the present article is our use of the more general karcher - scherk towers , introduced in @xcite , which come in families desingularizing any number of intersecting planes and so accommodate curves of intersection whose complements , in small neighborhoods of the curves , contain more than four components . note that although having more than two minimal surfaces intersect along a curve is not a generic situation , it can happen in rotationally invariant cases as for example in the case of coaxial catenoids . extending the results of @xcite to such situations for example is an interesting but difficult problem because one would have to use the full family of karcher - scherk towers as studied in @xcite . a motivation for our construction is the observation ( * ? ? ? * section 2.7 ) that lawson s surfaces may be regarded as desingularizations of a collection of great @xmath4-spheres intersecting with maximal symmetry along a common equator . in this article we pursue analogous constructions with tori instead of spheres as proposed in ( * ? ? ? * section 4 , page 300 ) . pitts and rubinstein have described one class of surfaces ( item 10 on table 1 of @xcite ) , similar to some of our surfaces , to be obtained by min - max methods . recently choe and soret @xcite have produced examples by solving plateau s problem for a suitably selected boundary , in the spirit of @xcite . their examples resemble the simpler examples we construct . ( to prove they are the same one would have to prove that the solution of the plateau problem is unique ; see remark [ r : unique ] ) . our construction has been developed independently and is more general in ways we describe below , and our strategy is quite different , based as we already mentioned on gluing techniques by singular perturbation methods . on the other hand our methods work only for high - genus surfaces . to outline , we construct two infinite families of embedded minimal surfaces in @xmath5 . the first family consists of desingularizations of a configuration @xmath6 ( see [ e : wk ] ) of @xmath7 clifford tori intersecting symmetrically along a pair of disjoint great circles @xmath8 and @xmath9 which lie on two orthogonal two - planes in @xmath10 . the second family consists of desingularizations of a configuration @xmath11 ( see [ e : wk ] ) which is the previous one augmented by the clifford torus which is equidistant from @xmath8 and @xmath9 . in both cases the construction is based on choosing `` scaffoldings '' , that is unions of great circles contained in the given configuration , and which we demand to be contained in the minimal surfaces we construct . moreover , reflections with respect to the great circles contained in the scaffoldings are required to be symmetries of our constructions . we denote the scaffoldings we choose by @xmath12 or @xmath13 ( see [ scaff ] ) . to construct the initial surfaces we replace tubular neighborhoods of the intersection circles with surfaces modeled on appropriately scaled and truncated maximally symmetric karcher - scherk towers . towers with @xmath14 ends are used along @xmath8 and @xmath9 , while classical scherk towers with @xmath15 ends are used along other circles of intersection ( present only in @xmath11 ) . the replacements are made so that each initial surface is closed and embedded , contains the applicable scaffolding , and is invariant under reflection through every scaffold circle ( see definition [ initsdef ] ) . these initial surfaces are perturbed then to minimality in a way which respects the reflections , so the surfaces produced are closed embedded minimal and still contain the scaffolding ( see the main theorem [ mainthm ] ) . note that lawson s approach also makes use of a scaffolding . our approach , however , gives much more freedom in the number of handles we include in the fundamental domain , while in lawson s method the fundamental domain is a disc so that plateau s problem can be solved . this makes no difference when considering the original construction of lawson in @xcite : we expect that the construction with more handles in the fundamental domain will still produce a lawson surface even though it does not a priori impose all the symmetries of the surface . when there are more than two circles of intersection involved , however , we can choose different numbers of handles on each of them and this gives a plethora of new surfaces as in the present constructions ( see the main theorem [ mainthm ] ) . it seems also rather daunting to try to construct even the simplest of our surfaces desingularizing @xmath11 by lawson s method . the present constructions motivate two important new directions for further study . first , what other similar desingularization constructions can be carried out in cases where there are obstructions due to less symmetry ? one has to deal then with the obstructions in the usual way by introducing smooth families of initial surfaces with the parameters corresponding to the obstructions as in earlier work ( see @xcite ) . we discuss this question in section [ further ] and we provide some partial answers . second , as remarked in the end of ( * ? ? ? * section 4.2 ) , there are various natural questions about rigidity and uniqueness for the surfaces presently constructed which are similar to those asked ( * ? ? ? * questions 4.3 , 4.4 and 4.5 ) about the lawson surfaces . in particular we are currently working to prove that the surfaces desingularizing @xmath6 can not be smoothly deformed to surfaces desingularizing @xmath2 clifford tori still intersecting along @xmath8 and @xmath9 but with different angles ( that is they can not `` flap their wings '' ) . more precisely we hope to prove that even with reduced symmetries imposed so `` flapping the wings '' is allowed , there are no new jacobi fields on our surfaces . @xmath3 as we have already mentioned the main difficulty of this construction as compared to earlier results is proving that under the symmetries imposed there is no kernel on the karcher - scherk towers . as for the classical singly periodic scherk surfaces ( @xmath16 ) @xcite , this is achieved by subdividing the surface suitably and applying the montiel - ros approach @xcite . our approach is also somewhat different than usual in some other aspects and we employ the high symmetry we have available . @xmath3 in section 2 we study in sufficient detail the maximally symmetric karcher - scherk towers using the enneper - weirstrass representation and following @xcite . in section 3 we study the geometry of the clifford tori and the initial configurations we will be using later , their symmetries , and the symmetries and scaffoldings we will impose in our constructions later . in section 4 we discuss in detail the construction of the initial surfaces and we study their geometry . in section 5 we provide estimates for the geometric quantities on the initial surfaces . in section 6 we study the linearized equation and estimate its solutions on the initial surfaces . we finally combine these results to establish the main theorem in section 7 . finally in section 8 we discuss further results using more technology . given an open set @xmath17 of a submanifold immersed in an ambient manifold endowed with metric @xmath18 , an exponent @xmath19 , and a tensor field @xmath20 on @xmath17 , possibly taking values in the normal bundle , we define the pointwise hlder seminorm @xmath21_\alpha(x ) = \sup_{y \in b_x } \frac{{\left\lvertt(x)-\tau_{yx}t(y)\right\rvert}_g}{d(x , y)^\alpha},\ ] ] where @xmath22 denotes the open geodesic ball , with respect to @xmath18 , with center @xmath23 and radius the minimum of @xmath24 and the injectivity radius at @xmath23 ; @xmath25 denotes the pointwise norm induced by @xmath18 ; @xmath26 denotes parallel transport , also induced by @xmath18 , from @xmath27 to @xmath23 along the unique geodesic in @xmath22 joining @xmath27 and @xmath23 ; and @xmath28 denotes the distance between @xmath23 and @xmath27 . given further a continuous positive function @xmath29 and a nonnegative integer @xmath30 , assuming that @xmath20 is a section of the bundle @xmath31 over @xmath17 all of whose order-@xmath30 partial derivatives ( with respect to any coordinate system ) exist and are continuous , we set @xmath32_\alpha(x)}{f(x)},\ ] ] where @xmath33 denotes the levi - civita connection determined by @xmath18 . in case @xmath31 is the trivial bundle @xmath34 , instead of @xmath35 we write @xmath36 . when @xmath37 , we write just @xmath38 , and when @xmath39 , we write just @xmath40 . additionally , if @xmath41 is a group acting a on a set @xmath42 and if @xmath43 is a subset of @xmath42 , then we refer to the subgroup @xmath44 as the _ stabilizer _ of @xmath43 in @xmath41 . when @xmath43 is a subset of euclidean @xmath1-space ( or the round @xmath1-sphere ) , we will set @xmath45 where @xmath46 ( or @xmath47 ) . for a subset @xmath48 of euclidean space ( or the round @xmath1-sphere ) we define @xmath49 to be the group generated by reflections with respect to the lines ( or great circles ) contained in @xmath48 . here reflection through a great circle can be defined as the restriction to the @xmath1-sphere of reflection in @xmath10 through the @xmath4-plane containing the circle . if @xmath41 is a group of isometries of a riemannian manifold with a two - sided immersed submanifold @xmath50 , then we call @xmath51 _ even _ if @xmath52 preserves the sides of @xmath50 and _ odd _ if it exchanges them . in this two - sided case , sections of the normal bundle of @xmath50 may be represented by functions , on which @xmath53 then acts according to @xmath54 , where @xmath55 is defined to be @xmath24 for @xmath52 even and @xmath56 for @xmath52 odd . we append a subscript @xmath41 to the spaces of functions defined above to designate the subspace which is @xmath57-equivariant in this sense so that for instance @xmath58 finally , we make extensive use of cutoff functions , and for this reason we fix a smooth function @xmath59 $ ] with the following properties : a. @xmath60 is nondecreasing , b. @xmath61 on @xmath62 $ ] and @xmath63 on @xmath64 $ ] , and c. @xmath65 is an odd function . given then @xmath66 with @xmath67 , we define a smooth function @xmath68:{\mathbb{r}}\to[0,1]$ ] by @xmath69=\psi\circ l_{a , b},\ ] ] where @xmath70 is the linear function defined by the requirements @xmath71 and @xmath72 . clearly then @xmath68 $ ] has the following properties : a. @xmath68 $ ] is weakly monotone , b. @xmath68=1 $ ] on a neighborhood of @xmath73 and @xmath68=0 $ ] on a neighborhood of @xmath74 , and c. @xmath68+\psi[b , a]=1 $ ] on @xmath75 . the authors would like to thank richard schoen for his continuous support and interest in the results of this article . was partially supported by nsf grants dms-1105371 and dms-1405537 . in @xcite karcher introduced generalizations of the classical singly periodic scherk surfaces , including the maximally symmetric karcher - scherk towers of order @xmath0 , which we will denote by @xmath76 . @xmath76 is a singly periodic , complete minimal surface embedded in euclidean @xmath1-space , asymptotic to @xmath2 planes intersecting at equal angles along a line . this line , which we call the axis of @xmath76 , is parallel to the direction of periodicity . the classical singly periodic scherk tower @xcite asymptotic to two orthogonal planes is recovered by taking @xmath16 . although in this article we will only use @xmath76 in our constructions , it is worth mentioning that there is a continuous family of singly periodic minimal surfaces with scherk - type ends which has been studied by prez and traizet in @xcite and in which family @xmath76 is the most symmetric member . we proceed to outline the construction of karcher @xcite . note that @xmath76 , which we will define in detail later , differs by a scaling and rotation from the surface described now . karcher considered the enneper - weierstrass data of @xmath77 on the closed unit disc in @xmath78 punctured at the @xmath14^th^ roots of @xmath56 . the embedding defined by the data maps the origin to a saddle point , the @xmath2 line segments joining opposite roots of @xmath56 to horizontal lines of symmetry intersecting at equal angles , the @xmath14 radii terminating at roots of unity to alternately ascending and descending curves of finite length lying in @xmath2 vertical planes of symmetry , and the @xmath14 circumferential arcs between consecutive roots of @xmath56 to curves of infinite length lying alternately in one of two horizontal planes of symmetry . the union of this region with its reflection through either horizontal plane of symmetry is a fundamental domain for the tower under periodic vertical translation . the images of small neighborhoods of the roots of @xmath56 are asymptotic to vertical half - planes , which bisect the vertical planes of symmetry . for future reference the following proposition fills in the details of the above outline and summarizes the basic geometric properties of @xmath76 , including its symmetries and asymptotic behavior . to state the lemma we make a few preliminary definitions . first we define the sets @xmath79 , a union of horizontal planes , and @xmath80 , a union of vertical planes , by @xmath81 whose intersection is the union of horizontal lines @xmath82 we enumerate the connected components of the complement of @xmath83 by @xmath84 for each @xmath85 , and we also define a partition of @xmath86 into disjoint sets @xmath87 and @xmath88 given by @xmath89 to describe the symmetries of @xmath76 we write @xmath90 for reflection in @xmath91 through the plane @xmath92 , @xmath93 for translation in @xmath91 by @xmath74 units along the directed line @xmath30 , and @xmath94 for rotation in @xmath91 through angle @xmath95 about the directed line @xmath30 ( according to the usual orientation conventions ) . a horizontal bar over a subset of @xmath91 denotes its topological closure in @xmath91 , and angled brackets enclosing a list of elements ( or sets of elements ) of @xmath96 indicate the subgroup generated by all the elements listed or included in the sets mentioned . [ tower ] for every integer @xmath0 there is a complete embedded minimal surface @xmath97 such that a. @xmath98 , @xmath99 , and every straight line on @xmath76 is contained in @xmath100 ; b. for any connected component @xmath42 of @xmath87 the intersection @xmath101 is an open disc with @xmath102 ( the union of four horizontal rays ) ; c. for each non negative integer @xmath103 the quotient surface @xmath104 has @xmath14 ends and genus @xmath105 ; d. @xmath106 ( recall [ gsym ] and [ grefl ] ) and @xmath107 acts transitively on the set of connected components of @xmath108 , the set of connected components of @xmath87 , and the set of connected components of @xmath88 ; e. @xmath109 ; f. @xmath110 ; g. @xmath111 ; and h. there exists @xmath112 so that @xmath113 has @xmath14 connected components , all isometric by the symmetries , exactly one of which lies in the region @xmath114 and the intersection of this component with @xmath115 is the graph @xmath116 over the @xmath117-plane of a function @xmath118 , which decays exponentially in the sense that @xmath119 we have @xmath120 the usual inner - weierstrass recipe ( see @xcite for example or any standard reference for the classical theory of minimal surfaces ) defines from the data [ weidata ] a minimal surface in @xmath91 parametrized by the closed unit disc in @xmath78 punctured at the @xmath121 roots of @xmath56 . requiring the parametrization to take the origin in @xmath78 to the origin in @xmath91 , it takes the form @xmath122 where @xmath123 is the @xmath124^th^ @xmath14^th^ root of @xmath56 and @xmath125 is the imaginary part of the branch of the logarithmic function cut along the ray from @xmath126 to @xmath127 and taking the value @xmath126 at @xmath24 . the symmetries can be read from the data by the following standard argument . looking at the expression for the metric @xmath128 in terms of the enneper - weierstrass data [ weidata ] , one identifies as intrinsic geodesics both circumferential arcs on the unit circle and diametric segments joining opposite @xmath129 roots of @xmath130 . looking next at the expression for the second fundamental form @xmath131\ ] ] in terms of the enneper - weierstrass data , it becomes apparent that the diametric segments joining opposite @xmath14^th^ roots of @xmath56 are extrinsic geodesics as well , which are therefore mapped to euclidean lines , while the diametric segments joining opposite @xmath14^th^ roots of unity along with the circumferential arcs are lines of curvature , which , being also intrinsic geodesics , are necessarily mapped to planar curves . consultation of [ weimap ] confirms that ( a ) the straight lines lie along the intersection of the single horizontal plane @xmath132 with the vertical planes of the form @xmath133 for @xmath134 , ( b ) the images of the circumferential arcs lie , alternatingly , in the two horizontal planes @xmath135 , and ( c ) the images of the remaining lines of curvature lie , consecutively , in the vertical planes of the form @xmath136 for @xmath134 . below we will check that the parametrization [ weimap ] is in fact an embedding of the punctured unit disc . in fact we will show that the image of the punctured sector @xmath137 is embedded and intersects the planes @xmath132 , @xmath138 , @xmath139 , and @xmath140 only along the curves just mentioned . the reflection principle for harmonic functions then implies that this image may be extended to a complete embedded minimal surface @xmath141 , invariant under reflection through any line in @xmath142 and through any plane of the form @xmath143 or @xmath144 for @xmath145 . we define @xmath146 . items ( ii ) and ( iii ) and the first two claims of item ( i ) follow immediately , as do the containments @xmath147 , considering that item ( v ) and the equalities @xmath148 are clear from the definitions ( [ ck ] and [ ak ] ) of @xmath100 , @xmath87 , and @xmath149 alone . to see the containment @xmath150 note that any symmetry of the tower must permute the asymptotic planes , so must preserve their intersection , so must take any line in @xmath100 to a line orthogonally intersecting the @xmath151-axis ; we are assuming ( and confirm with the maximum - principle argument below ) that @xmath76 intersects the @xmath151-axis only where @xmath100 does , and from the expression ( [ tow2ff ] ) for the second fundamental form we know we have already accounted for all lines on @xmath76 through such points . the equalities @xmath152 are also immediate consequences of the definitions . in particular reflection through the @xmath132 plane preserves @xmath100 , but it does not preserve @xmath76 ( because , for example , the normal to @xmath76 is not constantly vertical along the lines @xmath153 ) , so @xmath154 . now , since @xmath155 has index @xmath4 in @xmath156 and @xmath157 , in fact @xmath158 . thus we have checked items ( ii)-(vii ) , as well as the first two claims of ( i ) , and the transitivity claim in ( iv ) is now obvious . to verify the remaining claim in ( i ) , note that any straight line in @xmath76 , by virtue of the latter s minimality , is a line of reflectional symmetry . on the other hand reflection through a straight line in @xmath91 preserves @xmath87 only if the line is the @xmath151-axis ( and then only for @xmath2 even ) or if it is contained in @xmath100 or @xmath159 . it is easy to see , however , that of these lines only those contained in @xmath100 lie on the surface . ( for example [ weidata ] and [ weimap ] reveal that at easily identified points where any of the other lines do intersect the surface the normal to the surface there is parallel to the line . ) in addition to checking ( viii ) , it remains to show that the image of the region @xmath33 is embedded and intersects the planes @xmath132 , @xmath138 , @xmath139 , and @xmath140 as described above . that the tower is embedded may be established by recognizing the conjugate surface of the region between two consecutive horizontal planes of symmetry as a graph specifically the solution to the jenkins - serrin problem @xcite on a regular @xmath14-gon and then appealing to a theorem of krust . see @xcite for details on this approach . alternatively we show embeddedness more directly as follows and in the process identify the intersection of the image of @xmath33 with these four planes . recall that @xmath33 is the punctured sector @xmath160 . from [ weimap ] it is clear that @xmath161 is positive along the radial segment from the origin to @xmath24 and vanishes along both the radial segment from the origin to @xmath162 and the circular arc from @xmath24 to @xmath162 . a sufficiently small circular arc , centered at @xmath163 , which originates on the segment from @xmath126 to @xmath162 and terminates on the circumferential arc from @xmath162 to @xmath24 , can be seen from [ weimap ] to have height monotonically increasing from @xmath126 to @xmath164 . the maximum principle then implies that the image of @xmath33 is contained in the slab @xmath165 and intersects @xmath132 only along the ( straight , horizontal ) image of the radial segment to @xmath162 and @xmath138 only along the ( horizontal ) image of the circumferential arc . similarly , from [ weimap ] one may readily check monotonicity of @xmath166 , @xmath167 , and @xmath168 on the boundary curves of @xmath33 in order to establish that the boundary has image contained in the wedge @xmath169 . moreover , [ weimap ] reveals that in @xmath33 @xmath170 = 0,\end{aligned}\ ] ] so that another application of the maximum principle ( to the harmonic coordinate functions @xmath171 , @xmath172 , and @xmath173 , the last extended to the closure of @xmath33 ) establishes that the image of @xmath33 is contained in @xmath174 and intersects @xmath139 only along the image of the radial segment to @xmath24 and @xmath140 only along the image of the radial segment to @xmath162 . because of the symmetries it therefore suffices to show that the enneper - weierstrass parametrization restricts to @xmath33 as an embedding . to this end observe first that each level curve of @xmath172 in @xmath33 is connected . indeed one can verify that @xmath167 vanishes nowhere on @xmath33 and has norm ( relative to @xmath175 ) tending to infinity at @xmath162 , so @xmath176 defines a smooth vector field on the closure of @xmath33 . the corresponding flow for time @xmath177 , when it exists , maps points ( other than the fixed point @xmath162 ) with @xmath178 to points with @xmath179 . examining the field at the boundary , one can check that the backward flow of a point in @xmath33 exits @xmath33 only after it reaches the segment joining @xmath126 and @xmath162 , while the forward flow leaves @xmath33 only through the real boundary segment . thus , if the flow for time @xmath180 of a point @xmath23 on the real segment from @xmath126 to @xmath24 lies in @xmath33 , then the flow for time @xmath177 of any real point to the right of @xmath23 will also lie in @xmath33 . now given @xmath181 with @xmath182 , the flow for time @xmath183 takes each point to a point on the real segment of @xmath33 ( since by the maximum principle and earlier monotonicity arguments this segment is the entirety of the @xmath184 curve in @xmath33 ) . by the previous considerations the flow for time @xmath185 exists for every point on the real segment joining these points , so , the flow for time @xmath185 being a continuous function of the initial point , we get a level @xmath178 path joining @xmath186 and @xmath187 . now suppose there exist points @xmath181 such that @xmath188 and @xmath189 . then there is a path contained in a single level curve of @xmath172 joining @xmath186 and @xmath187 , and , if @xmath186 and @xmath187 are distinct , by the mean value theorem there exists a third point @xmath190 between @xmath186 and @xmath187 on this path at which @xmath166 vanishes along the path . thus at @xmath190 the gradients @xmath191 and @xmath192 must be parallel . one finds from [ weimap ] that these gradients are parallel only on the circular boundary of @xmath33 , where they are tangential to the boundary , and therefore they are endpoints of level curves , so that we may assume @xmath190 is not such a point . thus we conclude that @xmath193 , showing not only that the enneper - weierstrass parametrization is an embedding but also that its image of the unit disc is actually a graph over a region in the @xmath132 plane . now we prove ( viii ) . it is clear from [ weimap ] that for @xmath194 sufficiently large the set of @xmath195 in the unit disc with @xmath196 has @xmath14 components , each containing exactly one of the @xmath14^th^ roots of @xmath56 . we define @xmath197 so that @xmath198 is the signed distance of the image of @xmath195 from the plane @xmath140 and @xmath199 the three terms on the right being pairwise orthogonal . we will show that for @xmath200 sufficiently large there is a correspondingly small neighborhood @xmath201 of @xmath162 in the closed unit disc such that the map @xmath202 defined by @xmath203 restricts to a diffeomorphism from @xmath201 onto the half - strip @xmath204 $ ] . working from [ weimap ] we find @xmath205 @xmath206 and @xmath207 where @xmath208 and @xmath209 and @xmath210 are defined by the equalities where they are introduced . then @xmath211 , and for each nonnegative integer @xmath30 there exists a constant @xmath212 such that @xmath213 defining the map @xmath214 by @xmath215 we see that for @xmath194 sufficiently large the composite @xmath216 is well - defined ( identifying @xmath78 with @xmath217 as usual ) and @xmath218 so , since @xmath219 and @xmath220 for each integer @xmath221 , by taking @xmath194 large enough we can ensure that @xmath216 is a small perturbation of the identity and so a diffeomorphism with image containing the half - strip @xmath204 $ ] for some @xmath222 . thus @xmath223 itself restricts to a diffeomorphism from some region @xmath201 onto this half - strip , as asserted above , which shows that the image of @xmath201 under the enneper - weierstrass parametrization is the graph of @xmath224 over the half - strip @xmath225 . since @xmath226 is smooth on @xmath201 , @xmath227 , and @xmath228 , we finally obtain the estimates @xmath229 the union @xmath100 of all horizontal lines on @xmath76 can be regarded as a scaffolding for the tower , but we emphasize that a tower is not uniquely determined by a choice of scaffold : [ towerremark ] ( i ) the surface @xmath230 satisfies all conditions in the lemma provided the roles of @xmath87 and @xmath88 are reversed in the statement , so in particular its intersection with @xmath79 is @xmath100 . \(ii ) for @xmath103 a positive integer the surface @xmath231 also has @xmath100 as its intersection with @xmath79 , but the quotient surface @xmath232 has genus @xmath233 instead of @xmath126 ( recall [ tower].iii ) . in this subsection we discuss the clifford tori and their geometry . we first introduce some helpful notation . given a great circle @xmath234 in @xmath5 we will write @xmath235 for the furthest great circle from it . ( note that the points of @xmath235 are at distance @xmath236 in @xmath5 from @xmath234 and any point of @xmath237 is at distance @xmath238 from @xmath234 ) . as viewed from @xmath10 , the planes containing @xmath234 and @xmath235 are orthogonal complements . on the other hand , @xmath234 and @xmath235 may be regarded as parallel in that the function on @xmath5 measuring distance from one of the circles is constant on the other . ( this relation of parallelism between two great circles in @xmath5 is not transitive . ) another useful characterization of @xmath235 identifies it as the set of poles of great two - spheres with equator @xmath234 . [ d : tori ] if @xmath234 and @xmath239 are as above , then we call them _ totally orthogonal . _ we define the clifford torus @xmath240 $ ] with `` axis - circles '' @xmath234 and @xmath235 to be the set of points in @xmath5 equidistant from @xmath234 and @xmath235 . @xmath240 $ ] can be alternatively defined as the set of points which are at a distance @xmath241 from @xmath234 , or equivalently at a distance @xmath241 from @xmath235 . clearly @xmath240={\mathbb{t}}[c^\perp]$ ] . the set of points at distance @xmath242 from @xmath240 $ ] is @xmath243 and the set of points at distance @xmath244 from @xmath240 $ ] is @xmath245 . @xmath240 $ ] is a flat , square , embedded torus , foliated by the circles , of radius @xmath246 in @xmath10 , where great two - spheres having @xmath234 as equator and poles on @xmath235 intersect @xmath247 , and also by the circles , orthogonally intersecting these , where great two - spheres having equator @xmath235 and poles on @xmath234 intersect @xmath247 in pairs on opposite sides of the equator . evidently any element of @xmath47 that preserves @xmath248 as a set is a symmetry of @xmath240 $ ] . the group of these symmetries includes arbitrary rotation or reflection in the two circles as well as orthogonal transformations exchanging the circles . to proceed further we have the following . [ d : rot ] given @xmath234 as above , @xmath249 , and assuming an orientation chosen on the totally orthogonal circle @xmath235 , we define @xmath250 , rotation about @xmath234 by angle @xmath95 , to be the element of @xmath251 preserving @xmath234 pointwise and rotating the totally orthogonal circle @xmath235 through an angle @xmath95 , according to the chosen orientation on @xmath235 . just as well @xmath250 may be called rotation in @xmath235 by angle @xmath95 . we assume now that orientations have been chosen for both @xmath234 and @xmath235 . ( of course , after orienting @xmath5 , an orientation on a circle @xmath234 determines an orientation on @xmath235 . ) we define then two @xmath252 subgroups of @xmath47 by @xmath253 each of whose elements rotates @xmath234 and @xmath235 simultaneously by a common angle , the two subgroups being distinguished by the relative sense of rotation in the circles . it is easy to see that any such one - parameter subgroup of @xmath47 , acting by common rotation in a pair of totally orthogonal circles , has only great circles as orbits . moreover by an easy calculation the orbits of @xmath254 intersect the orbits of @xmath255 at an angle equal to twice the distance from @xmath234 . consequently , @xmath240 $ ] itself is foliated by two such families of great circles , with the circles of one family intersecting the circles of the other orthogonally . more explicitly let @xmath256 $ ] be great circles through some given point @xmath257 $ ] with @xmath33 an orbit of @xmath254 and @xmath258 an orbit of @xmath255 . then one family consists of the images of @xmath33 under the action of @xmath255 and the other of the images of @xmath258 under the action of @xmath259 . reflection through @xmath33 ( that is @xmath260 ) preserves the great circles in @xmath240 $ ] which are orthogonal to @xmath33 . since these great circles foliate @xmath240 $ ] we conclude that the reflection @xmath260 is a symmetry of @xmath240 $ ] . it follows that any point of a clifford torus lies on a circle of reflection ( two in fact ) and this immediately implies the minimality of the torus ( since the symmetry allows the mean curvature nowhere to point ) . of course the two great circles through a point are asymptotic lines for the second fundamental form ; the short circles mentioned above latitudes @xmath242 from the poles of great two - spheres with equator one of the axis - circles bisect these and as such are circles of principal curvature . these circles have curvature @xmath261 in @xmath10 and @xmath24 in @xmath5 , showing that the second fundamental form of @xmath240 $ ] has constant norm @xmath261 . this also implies that there are no great circles on @xmath240 $ ] other than the orbits of @xmath262 as above , and therefore reflection through any great circle in @xmath240 $ ] is a symmetry of @xmath240 $ ] . given now @xmath33 and @xmath258 as above , @xmath263 rotates the points of @xmath33 to a parallel great circle along orthogonal geodesic segments parallel to @xmath258 . taking @xmath264 we conclude that @xmath265 , and similarly @xmath266 , are great circles which are parallel to @xmath33 and @xmath258 respectively on @xmath240 $ ] at distance @xmath236 . this implies that @xmath267 moreover , the elements of @xmath254 which were originally expressed as common rotations in @xmath234 and @xmath235 , are just as well common rotations in @xmath33 and @xmath268 ( since @xmath269 and @xmath270 obviously have the same action on @xmath33 and @xmath268 , which are orbits of @xmath271 and are the intersections with @xmath5 of two @xmath4-planes spanning @xmath10 ) and hence @xmath272 if we choose orientations on @xmath33 and @xmath268 appropriately ( or if we choose an orientation on @xmath5 ) . similarly @xmath273 ( since @xmath258 and @xmath274 are orbits of @xmath275 ) . by the above @xmath240 $ ] is ruled by two families of great circles and any great circle on @xmath240 $ ] belongs to one of the two families . any two circles in a single family are thereby not only parallel in @xmath240 $ ] but also parallel in @xmath5 in the sense of distance as defined above . moreover @xmath240 $ ] is generated by twisting about any one of its great circles @xmath33 an orthogonally intersecting great circle @xmath258 , where the twisting is common rotation in @xmath33 and @xmath268 : traversing @xmath33 , the conormal co - rotates with the position vector , tracing out @xmath33 and @xmath268 at equal rates . in this sense the clifford torus resembles the helicoid , but the helicoid is just singly ruled , while all of the clifford torus great circles are on equal footing . additionally , while each helicoid is either right or left - handed , every clifford torus is ambidextrous , being right - handed along the circles of one foliation and left - handed along the others . more precisely , given an orientation on @xmath5 , a clifford torus @xmath240 $ ] , and a great circle @xmath276 $ ] , we call @xmath33 right - handed if @xmath277={\mathbb{t}}[c]$ ] and left - handed if @xmath278={\mathbb{t}}[c]$ ] . furthermore , an element @xmath279 of @xmath47 fixing a great circle @xmath33 on @xmath240 $ ] pointwise but rotating @xmath268 along itself will of course preserve @xmath33 and @xmath268 as sets but rotate @xmath240 $ ] . such considerations reveal the existence of a one - parameter family @xmath280 \ , : \ , \phi \in { \mathbb{r}}\}$ ] of clifford tori , each intersecting @xmath240 $ ] transversely along @xmath33 and @xmath268 at a constant angle @xmath95 . since two great circles intersecting @xmath33 orthogonally can meet only on @xmath33 or @xmath268 ( unless they coincide everywhere ) , the ruling forbids distinct members of this family from intersecting anywhere else . more precisely for @xmath281 , @xmath282 = { \mathsf{r}}_d^{\phi_2}{\mathbb{t}}[c]$ ] when @xmath283 and @xmath282 \cap { \mathsf{r}}_d^{\phi_2}{\mathbb{t}}[c]= d\cup d^\perp$ ] otherwise . there is a second one - parameter family of clifford tori through @xmath33 and @xmath268 , having the opposite chirality along both , compared to the first family . this family can be obtained from the first by , for example , reflection through a great two - sphere containing @xmath33 ( or @xmath268 ) . a member of one family then intersects each member of the other family along two pairs of circles : @xmath33 and @xmath268 as well as two more circles , @xmath258 and @xmath274 , where @xmath33 and @xmath268 intersect @xmath258 and @xmath274 orthogonally . the angle of intersection varies ( from @xmath126 to @xmath284 ) along these circles , with tangency of the surfaces occurring at the eight points where the four circles intersect in pairs . note that by the above if @xmath33 is any great circle , then any clifford torus @xmath247 which contains @xmath33 contains also @xmath268 . moreover @xmath247 belongs to one of two families of clifford tori containing @xmath285 as described above . also for each point @xmath286 there is a unique torus in each family which contains it , and on that torus there is a unique great circle through @xmath287 parallel to @xmath33 and @xmath268 in the torus . additionally note that if @xmath288 $ ] , then , fixing a point @xmath289 , there is a point @xmath290 at distance @xmath242 from @xmath291 , and in fact @xmath287 must lie a distance @xmath242 from @xmath33 , since otherwise there would be a point on @xmath33 less than @xmath242 from @xmath234 , violating the definition of @xmath240 $ ] . on the other hand , @xmath33 is preserved by @xmath271 or @xmath275 while both subgroups act transitively on @xmath234 , so actually the distance from every point on @xmath234 to @xmath33 is @xmath242 . we conclude that whenever @xmath33 is a great circle on @xmath240 $ ] , @xmath234 is also a great circle on @xmath292 $ ] . now suppose two clifford tori @xmath240 $ ] and @xmath293 $ ] have intersection @xmath294 , where @xmath33 is a great circle . since @xmath276 $ ] and @xmath295 $ ] , it follows from the last observation in the previous paragraph that @xmath296 $ ] . moreover @xmath240 $ ] and @xmath293 $ ] must have the same chirality along @xmath33 ( since otherwise their intersection would be larger as above ) , so one torus can be obtained from the other by a rotation about @xmath33 , and therefore @xmath234 and @xmath297 ( and @xmath235 and @xmath298 ) must be parallel great circles on @xmath292 $ ] . conversely , if @xmath234 and @xmath297 are parallel great circles on @xmath292 $ ] , then @xmath297 can be obtained from @xmath234 by a rotation about @xmath33 , so @xmath293 $ ] is obtained from @xmath240 $ ] by the same rotation , and therefore @xmath240 $ ] and @xmath293 $ ] intersect along just @xmath33 and @xmath268 as described above . thus two clifford tori intersect along a single pair of totally orthogonal great circles precisely when all four of their axis - circles are parallel on the clifford torus equidistant from the intersection circles . moreover if @xmath240 $ ] and @xmath293 $ ] orthogonally intersect along great circles @xmath33 and @xmath268 , then each contains the axis - circles of the other : by definition of @xmath240 $ ] , geodesics emanating from @xmath247 orthogonally hit @xmath248 at distance @xmath242 from @xmath247 , but geodesics intersecting @xmath240 $ ] orthogonally at @xmath33 by assumption lie on @xmath293 $ ] . on the other hand two clifford tori @xmath240 $ ] and @xmath293 $ ] have intersection @xmath299 precisely when @xmath234 and @xmath297 intersect orthogonally , in which case @xmath235 and @xmath298 also intersect orthogonally and moreover @xmath300\cap{\mathbb{t}}[d']$ ] . indeed , suppose first that @xmath240 \cap { \mathbb{t}}[c']=d\cup d^\perp\cup d'\cup{d'}^\perp$ ] . since @xmath33 lies on @xmath301 $ ] and @xmath302 $ ] , @xmath234 and @xmath297 must be great circles on @xmath292 $ ] ; if @xmath234 and @xmath297 were parallel , then @xmath301 $ ] and @xmath302 $ ] would intersect transversely along @xmath33 and @xmath268 only , as in the preceding paragraph , so they must intersect orthogonally . by identical reasoning @xmath235 and @xmath298 must also intersect orthogonally and in fact all four axis - circles lie on @xmath303 $ ] as well as on @xmath292 $ ] , whose intersection is therefore precisely the union of these circles . conversely , if we assume @xmath234 and @xmath297 are two orthogonally intersecting great circles , then we can construct the two clifford tori @xmath247 and @xmath304 containing @xmath234 and @xmath297 ( so that @xmath305 ) and their corresponding axes @xmath294 and @xmath306 ; it follows from the previous three sentences ( exchanging the roles of all @xmath234 and @xmath33 circles ) that @xmath33 and @xmath258 as well as @xmath268 and @xmath274 intersect orthogonally and their union is all of @xmath301 \cap t[c']$ ] . starting with orthogonally intersecting axis - circles @xmath234 and @xmath297 as above , by varying the angle between @xmath234 and @xmath297 while fixing their two intersection points one obtains pairs of tori intersecting along ( noncircular ) curves with four points of tangency . the full space of intersections is two - dimensional , corresponding to the relative configuration of representative axis - circles . it can be parametrized by , for instance , the minimum and maximum distances from one of the axis - circles to points on the other . the case of tangency corresponds to the minimum vanishing , while the case of constant - angle intersection along a pair of orthogonal great circles corresponds to equality of the minimum and maximum . we remark finally that any two clifford tori necessarily intersect . this is a consequence of a general result of frankel @xcite , but for an elementary argument note that every single clifford torus divides @xmath5 into two connected components , which are open tubular neighborhoods of each axis - circle , so if two clifford tori failed to intersect , then one side of one of them would have to be properly contained in one side of the other , but the two sides have equal volume , precluding this situation . although in the previous subsection we discussed clifford tori in some generality , in this article we will only be concerned with finite maximally symmetric subcollections of a one - parameter family of tori intersecting along a pair of totally orthogonal great circles and the clifford torus equidistant from the circles of intersection . to fix the notation we start by taking @xmath5 to be the unit sphere in @xmath10 , to which we give its standard orientation and which we will routinely identify with @xmath307 via the map @xmath308 , so that @xmath309 . we write @xmath310 for the unit circles in the coordinate planes , oriented by increasing @xmath177 . as described in the previous subsection there is a unique clifford torus @xmath311={\mathbb{t}}[c_2 ] = \left\ { \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(e^{i{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x } } } } , e^{i{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}\right ) : { \ensuremath{\mathrm{x } } } , { \ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}\in { \mathbb{r}}\right\}\ ] ] equidistant from @xmath8 and @xmath9 . there is also a one - parameter family of clifford tori containing @xmath8 ( so also @xmath9 ) and right - handed along it ( so also along @xmath9 ) ; we distinguish the one @xmath312 that contains the great circle @xmath313 in the real plane @xmath314 in @xmath307 ( see [ e : cphph ] for the notation ) . for each integer @xmath0 we intend to desingularize the configurations @xmath315 of @xmath2 and @xmath316 clifford tori respectively , where for each integer @xmath124 @xmath317 so that @xmath318 and @xmath319 for all @xmath145 . thus @xmath320 intersects @xmath321 at constant angle @xmath322 along @xmath8 and @xmath9 , while @xmath320 intersects @xmath304 orthogonally along the two totally orthogonal geodesics on @xmath320 equidistant to @xmath8 and @xmath9 . reflections through certain great circles will play an important role in the construction , so we name some of these circles now . first we define for each @xmath323 @xmath324 oriented by increasing @xmath151 . clearly for each @xmath325 @xmath326 so in total there are @xmath327 such great circles , pairwise disjoint ; @xmath328 consists of the @xmath14 great circles where @xmath304 intersects the other clifford tori in @xmath329 : @xmath330 and @xmath331 and @xmath332 are parallel on @xmath320 to @xmath8 and @xmath9 at a distance @xmath242 ; and for @xmath333 @xmath334 is the closer of two totally orthogonal great circles on @xmath304 equidistant from @xmath331 and @xmath335 . we also mention that @xmath336 = { \mathbb{t}}[c'_{j+3k/2}].\ ] ] next for @xmath337 we label the great circle orthogonally intersecting @xmath8 at @xmath338 and @xmath9 at @xmath339 by @xmath340 thus @xmath341 and @xmath342 are disjoint unless @xmath343 or @xmath344 is an integral multiple of @xmath345 , in which case they intersect only at two antipodal points on @xmath8 ( when @xmath346 ) , only at two antipodal points on @xmath9 ( when @xmath347 ) , or they coincide ; in particular @xmath348 for all @xmath349 . note also that @xmath350 where the intersections at the four points are orthogonal , and that @xmath320 is foliated by the disjoint great circles @xmath341 satisfying @xmath351 for @xmath352 . last we define for each @xmath353 the great circle @xmath354 oriented by increasing @xmath151 . note that the clifford torus @xmath304 is foliated by the disjoint great circles @xmath355 with @xmath356 , @xmath357 and the parameter @xmath358 measures the angle at the point @xmath359 between @xmath247 and @xmath360 , which is a clifford torus through @xmath8 and @xmath9 but left - handed along both . note also that the circles @xmath355 and @xmath331 intersect orthogonally at two points given by @xmath361 for future reference we first note the identity @xmath362 for any two great circles @xmath234 and @xmath297 and angles @xmath363 , as well as the particular products @xmath364 we now describe the symmetry groups of the above configurations . [ configsym ] ( i ) for @xmath0 @xmath365 in particular this group contains reflection through @xmath341 whenever @xmath366 , through @xmath331 for all @xmath367 , and through @xmath355 for all @xmath353 . \(ii ) @xmath368 for @xmath369 . \(iii ) @xmath370 . first suppose @xmath0 . it is clear that @xmath371 contains the group on the right - hand side of equation [ gsymwk ] . a symmetry of @xmath6 will either exchange the intersection circles @xmath8 and @xmath9 or will preserve each as a set . in particular it will preserve @xmath372={\mathbb{t}}[c_2]$ ] , so @xmath373 . moreover , each element of @xmath47 is completely determined by its action on @xmath8 and @xmath9 . if a symmetry of @xmath6 preserves @xmath8 , then it also preserves @xmath9 and it must act by rotation or reflection in each circle . an orthogonal transformation reversing the orientation of one circle but preserving the orientation of the other can not be a symmetry of @xmath6 ( since @xmath8 and @xmath9 are right - handed in all of the tori of the configuration and a reflection in just one of them reverses chirality ) . a symmetry acting by a reflection in one circle must therefore act by reflection in both circles ; in other words such a symmetry must be a reflection through a geodesic of @xmath5 orthogonally intersecting @xmath8 and @xmath9 . reflection through a geodesic orthogonal to both @xmath8 and @xmath9 will preserve the configuration precisely when the geodesic lies in @xmath374 , meaning on one of the tori or halfway between two tori . reflections through these geodesics clearly belong to the group on the right - hand side of [ gsymwk ] . any rotation in each circle preserving @xmath6 can be composed with a symmetry of the form @xmath375 to produce a symmetry fixing @xmath8 pointwise and rotating @xmath9 . clearly any such symmetry likewise belongs to the group on the right - hand side of [ gsymwk ] , so we have now accounted for all symmetries of @xmath6 preserving @xmath8 and @xmath9 separately . any transformation exchanging the two circles is the product of a transformation preserving them with the reflection through a geodesic equidistant from @xmath8 and @xmath9 . these are the great circles on the torus @xmath304 , and reflection through such a circle is a symmetry of the configuration precisely when the geodesic either orthogonally intersects all the other tori or else lies on either one of the other tori or halfway between a consecutive pair of these . all these reflections belong to the right - hand side of [ gsymwk ] too , so we have finished checking ( i ) . if @xmath369 , then any element of @xmath329 must permute the intersection circles @xmath8 and @xmath9 ( and can not exchange them with any intersection circles on @xmath304 ) and therefore must preserve @xmath6 , confirming ( ii ) . in the case @xmath16 , however , the three tori @xmath376 , @xmath377 , and @xmath304 are all equivalent under the symmetries , as are all six intersection circles @xmath8 , @xmath9 , @xmath378 , @xmath379 , @xmath380 , and @xmath381 . in particular @xmath382 belongs to @xmath383 and exchanges @xmath376 and @xmath304 . any symmetry of @xmath384 exchanging @xmath304 with either of the other clifford tori can be composed with @xmath382 and ( possibly ) an element of @xmath385 to obtain an element of @xmath385 , completing the proof of ( iii ) . the choices we are about to make to desingularize the initial configurations will break many of the symmetries just described , including in particular the continuous symmetries . nevertheless , to simplify the construction we will insist on retaining reflections through a collection of great circles which will be included in their entirety on the surfaces we construct and which serve as a sort of scaffolding for the construction . more precisely for any integers @xmath0 and @xmath386 we introduce the scaffoldings @xmath387 and corresponding groups @xmath388 motivation for the choice of scaffolds and corresponding symmetries can be found in the next section . for any integers @xmath0 and @xmath386 a. @xmath389 is the union of @xmath390 great circles , of which the @xmath391 circles @xmath392 with @xmath393 are parallel on @xmath321 ; b. @xmath394 is the union of @xmath395 great circles , of which the @xmath396 circles @xmath397 with @xmath398 are parallel on @xmath321 and the @xmath396 circles @xmath399 with @xmath398 are parallel on @xmath304 ; c. @xmath389 intersects each of @xmath8 and @xmath9 at the @xmath400 roots of unity , at each of which points exactly @xmath2 great circles in @xmath389 intersect , one on each @xmath321 ; d. @xmath394 intersects each of @xmath8 and @xmath9 at the @xmath401 roots of unity , at each of which points exactly @xmath2 great circles in @xmath394 intersect , one on each @xmath321 ; e. @xmath394 intersects each @xmath402 with @xmath403 at the @xmath404 points @xmath405 , with @xmath406 , at each of which exactly two great circles in @xmath394 intersect , namely @xmath407 on @xmath321 and @xmath408 on @xmath304 ; f. @xmath409 ; and g. @xmath410 . items ( i)-(v ) follow immediately from the definitions , as do the containments in the last two items . referring to [ symcomp ] , we observe @xmath411 completing the proof . we define @xmath412 by @xmath413 observe that @xmath414 takes planes of constant @xmath415 to clifford tori through @xmath8 and @xmath9 , cylinders of constant @xmath416 to constant - mean - curvature tori ( degenerating to @xmath8 or @xmath9 when @xmath416 is respectively an even or odd multiple of @xmath236 ) with axis - circles @xmath8 and @xmath9 , horizontal planes to great two - spheres with equator @xmath9 , and radial and vertical lines to great circles . in particular @xmath417 , @xmath418 , @xmath419 , @xmath420 , and @xmath421 . on the other hand the clifford torus left - handed along @xmath8 and containing the circle @xmath422 is the image under @xmath414 of the helicoid @xmath423 , and @xmath355 and @xmath424 are the images of the two helices where this helicoid intersects the cylinder @xmath425 . in particular @xmath426 . though great spheres do not play an important role in the construction , to aid understanding of the geometry of @xmath414 we also mention that the great sphere with equator @xmath8 and poles @xmath427 is the image of the helicoid @xmath428 . moreover , the open solid torus @xmath429 is mapped diffeomorphically by @xmath414 onto the open solid torus of points within @xmath430 of @xmath8the @xmath8 side of @xmath304and @xmath414 is an approximate isometry for small @xmath416 . more precisely , writing @xmath431 for the round metric on @xmath5 and @xmath432 for the euclidean metric on @xmath91 , we have @xmath433 we also note that @xmath414 intertwines some symmetries of interest : for every @xmath434 @xmath435 since @xmath414 maps the asymptotic planes of the karcher - scherk towers to clifford tori , we can smoothly glue the towers imported by @xmath414 to the tori of our configurations by straightening the wings to exact half - planes before applying @xmath414 . we accomplish this transition using the cut - off functions defined in [ epsiab ] . specifically , given integers @xmath0 and @xmath386 , we set @xmath436 and we define the map @xmath437 by modifying the inclusion map @xmath438 ( recall [ tower ] ) as follows . we will specify @xmath439 on the wedge @xmath440 and complete its global definition by requiring it to commute with all elements of @xmath107 . we assume that @xmath103 is large enough so that @xmath441 . the new map @xmath439 agrees with @xmath442 on @xmath443 . we recall from [ tower ] that the complement @xmath444 is the graph @xmath445 of the function @xmath446 over the half - plane @xmath447 and further that this graph misses the boundary of the wedge . we decree that @xmath448}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}})w_k({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\ ] ] for each point @xmath449 in this region . imposing the symmetries as just described completes the definition of @xmath450 , and we also define its truncated image @xmath451 for any @xmath452 controlling the truncation . each initial surface @xmath453 desingularizing @xmath6 is specified by a quintuple of data @xmath454 , and each initial surface @xmath455 desingularizing @xmath11 is specified by a septuple @xmath456 , where @xmath0 and @xmath457 are integers and @xmath458 . the role of @xmath2 in the definition of the initial configurations is already clear : it is the number of clifford tori intersecting along @xmath8 and @xmath9 . along with @xmath103 it determines the scaffolding ( @xmath389 or @xmath394 ) according to [ scaff ] . we have also used @xmath103 in [ adef ] to set the distance from a tower s axis at which its wings are straightened . together with @xmath2 and @xmath103 the remaining positive integers ( either @xmath459 , @xmath460 , and @xmath461 or @xmath462 and @xmath463 ) specify the number of fundamental periods , or equivalently the scale , of the towers along each circle of intersection . finally , the relative alignment of towers along the various circles is prescribed by either @xmath464 or @xmath465 and @xmath466 . we will now explain the roles of the data in slightly more detail and simultaneously offer some brief motivation for the definitions of the scaffoldings ( [ scaff ] above ) and the initial surfaces ( [ initsdef ] below ) . the initial surfaces are to be constructed from the initial configurations they are intended to desingularize by replacing a tubular neighborhood of each intersection circle @xmath234 with a truncated karcher - scherk tower with straightened wings , scaled in @xmath91 by some factor @xmath467 , mapped into @xmath5 by @xmath414 , and then positioned as desired along @xmath234 by a rotation @xmath468 \in o(4)$ ] : @xmath469\phi \left ( { m_{_c}}^{-1 } \widetilde{\mathcal{s}}_{{k_{_c}},m}\left({m_{_c}}s_{_c}\right ) \right),\ ] ] where @xmath470 is the number ( either @xmath2 or @xmath4 ) of clifford tori intersecting along @xmath234 in the corresponding initial configuration and where @xmath471 is picked , somewhat arbitrarily , to ensure each tower is truncated well away from towers on neighboring circles . since @xmath76 has fundamental period @xmath472 and @xmath414 is periodic in @xmath151 with period @xmath472 ( each circle of intersection having length @xmath472 ) , obviously @xmath473 must be an integer in order for the initial surface to be embedded . further constraints on each @xmath473 are placed by the following symmetry requirements which we make of the initial surface to simplify the analysis of the linearized operator on the towers in section [ linear ] . [ sa ] let @xmath50 be an initial surface . we require @xmath474 and @xmath475 , and for each intersection circle @xmath234 in the corresponding initial configuration we require @xmath476 . the assumption ensures triviality of the kernel of each tower s jacobi operator restricted to the space of deformations respecting @xmath477 ; we do not claim that these conditions are necessary , but they are natural and sufficient . it is not hard to check ( using [ tower ] and [ symcomp ] for instance ) that imposing [ sa ] is equivalent to demanding @xmath478 and @xmath479 ( when @xmath50 desingularizes @xmath6 ) or @xmath480 and @xmath481 ( when @xmath50 desingularizes @xmath11 ) for some integer @xmath386 . in particular each tower @xmath482 must itself contain the appropriate scaffolding , forcing @xmath473 to divide @xmath391 ( when @xmath478 ) or @xmath396 ( when @xmath483 . since @xmath484 includes no symmetries exchanging @xmath8 and @xmath9 , the quotients @xmath485 and @xmath486 are independent and are given by @xmath460 and @xmath461 . on the other hand modulo @xmath487 @xmath8 and @xmath9 are equivalent to one another but to no other intersection circles , while for every @xmath145 the circles @xmath331 and @xmath488 are equivalent but @xmath331 and @xmath335 are inequivalent . thus only @xmath489 , @xmath490 , and @xmath491 can be independently prescribed as @xmath459 , @xmath462 , and @xmath463 respectively . the data so far described completely determine the periods and sizes of the towers replacing the circles of intersection , but this information and the particular scaffolding do not quite fix the initial surface @xmath50 , even up to congruence . ( we call two initial surfaces @xmath492 and @xmath493 _ congruent _ in @xmath5 if there exists @xmath494 such that @xmath495 . ) specifically there is some not entirely inconsequential freedom in the choice of @xmath468 $ ] in [ sigmac ] : it may be replaced by @xmath496 $ ] ; equivalently we could replace the tower @xmath76 defining @xmath497 by its `` dual '' tower mentioned in remark [ towerremark ] and having the same scaffolding and symmetry group as @xmath76 but occupying @xmath88 instead of @xmath87 . accordingly we allow the values of @xmath464 to make a choice of one model tower or the other along @xmath9 for initial surfaces desingularizing @xmath6 and we use @xmath465 and @xmath466 for identical purposes along the towers @xmath331 with @xmath124 odd and even respectively for initial surfaces desingularizing @xmath11 . thus these data control the _ alignment _ of the towers . it is not necessary to allow for the two possibilities on every ( inequivalent ) intersection circle , since up to congruence it is only the relative alignment that matters . in fact , even allowing realignment on just the circles mentioned , we still sometimes produce congruent initial surfaces with different values of @xmath464 ( or @xmath465 and @xmath466 ) , depending on the parities of the other data . for example , assuming @xmath460 and @xmath461 relatively prime ( since we may absorb a common divisor into @xmath103 ) , the surfaces @xmath498 and @xmath499 ( formally defined in [ initsdef ] below ) desingularizing @xmath6 are congruent precisely when either @xmath103 or exactly one @xmath500 is odd . indeed , if @xmath501 is odd , then @xmath502 if @xmath460 is even but @xmath461 odd , then @xmath503 and if @xmath460 is odd but @xmath103 and @xmath461 even , then @xmath504 to see that @xmath505 and @xmath506 are not congruent when @xmath103 is even and both @xmath460 and @xmath461 are odd , recall that each initial surface will be defined to include the scaffold circles whose union is @xmath507 , which orthogonally intersect @xmath8 and @xmath9 at the @xmath400 roots of unity on each . choosing the global normal which at @xmath359 points in the positive direction of @xmath8 then determines the direction of that normal at all @xmath400 roots of unity on @xmath8 and @xmath9 . we call the unit normal at such a point positive if it points in the positive direction of the circle on which it lies and we call it negative otherwise . then , given two such points joined by an arc of a great circle in @xmath389 , we say that the two normals there are aligned if they are either both positive or both negative and otherwise say that they are antialigned . the parities assumed for the data imply that , for a given initial surface with that data , this alignment does not depend on the pair of chosen points and therefore defines a property of the initial surface which is invariant under congruences that preserve @xmath389 , but it is reversed by altering the value of @xmath464 . this shows that @xmath505 is not congruent to @xmath506 . similar considerations apply to surfaces desingularizing @xmath11 , but to avoid complicating the definition of the initial surfaces we do not make a systematic effort to eliminate completely duplication of congruence classes within the collection of initial surfaces . with the foregoing in mind we define the initial surfaces as follows , recalling [ adef ] and [ stildekm ] . [ initsdef ] given integers @xmath0 , @xmath386 , and relatively prime @xmath508 , as well as @xmath509 , set @xmath510 given instead integers @xmath0 , @xmath511 , and relatively prime @xmath512 , as well as @xmath513 , set @xmath514 \right ) \right ) \\ & \;\;\ ; \cup \bigcup_{j=0}^{2k-1 } { \mathsf{r}}_{c_1}^{j\pi / k } \left({\mathsf{r}}_{c_1}^{\pi / kmn'_{(-1)^j } } { \mathsf{r}}_{c_2}^{\pi / kmn'_{(-1)^j}}\right ) ^{\sigma'_{(-1)^j } } { \mathsf{r}}_{c_{0,0}^{\pi/4}{\mathsf{r}}_{c_{\frac{\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2}}}^{\pi/4}}\phi \left(\frac{1}{2kmn'_{(-1)^j } } \widetilde{\mathcal{s}}_{2,m } \left(2kmn'_{(-1)^j}\frac{\pi}{4k}\right ) \right ) . \end{aligned}\ ] ] we will abbreviate the initial surfaces @xmath515 and @xmath516 by @xmath453 and @xmath455 respectively or sometimes indiscriminately by @xmath50 , when context permits . the divisibility assumptions are made to avoid listing a single initial surface multiple times under different labels , but as already acknowledged some redundancy persists in the list in that certain items are congruent to others . in such cases the resulting minimal surfaces ultimately produced will also be congruent . we next collect some basic properties of the initial surfaces . [ initsprop ] for every choice of data , assuming @xmath517 , the initial surfaces @xmath515 and @xmath518 are closed , smooth surfaces embedded in @xmath5 . moreover a. @xmath453 has genus @xmath519 ; b. @xmath455 has genus @xmath520 ; c. @xmath521 and @xmath522 ; and d. @xmath523 and @xmath524 . the closedness , smoothness , and embeddedness of the initial surfaces are clear from the definition and preceding discussion . for ( i ) , the components of @xmath525 may be grouped into pairs of consecutive ( in the sense of rotations about either circle ) components , and the two members of each pair may then be glued to each other along @xmath8 and @xmath9 to form @xmath2 new ( topological ) tori . we get the connected sum of these tori , a surface of genus @xmath2 , at the cost of one fundamental period of a tower along @xmath8 ( or @xmath9 ) . each additional fundamental period , of the towers along @xmath8 and @xmath9 , then contributes @xmath526 handles to the resulting surface . the genus of @xmath455 is similarly calculated . each portion of @xmath304 between two consecutive circles of intersection is glued to two portions of tori , both from alternately the @xmath8 or the @xmath9 side , orthogonally intersecting it , where these latter two are themselves glued along the circle where they intersect ( so either @xmath8 or @xmath9 ) . in this way we obtain @xmath14 topological tori , whose connected sum we take at the cost of one fundamental period for all but one tower on @xmath304 . each additional period of each of these towers contributes one handle to the resulting surface , while each period of each of the remaining two towers contributes @xmath526 handles . the great circles in the scaffoldings pass uninterrupted through the desingularized circles of intersection by virtue of the positioning and scaling in [ initsdef ] and the fact that @xmath414 maps the horizontal lines on the euclidean towers to great circles . that reflections through these geodesics belong to the stabilizers of the initial surfaces follows from the intertwining [ phintertwine ] by @xmath414 of symmetries of @xmath76 ( [ tower ] ) with symmetries of the configurations ( [ configsym ] ) to be desingularized . [ unitnormal ] since each initial surface is embedded in @xmath5 , it is also orientable and therefore possesses a unique global unit normal , henceforth denoted @xmath527 , which points in the positive direction ( meaning toward @xmath528 ) along @xmath8 at @xmath529 . we will write @xmath18 for the metric on each initial surface induced by its defining embedding in @xmath530 , @xmath43 for its @xmath527-directed scalar - valued second fundamental form , and @xmath531 for its @xmath527-directed scalar - valued mean curvature . before proceeding with the construction , we pause to elaborate briefly on the symmetry groups , that is the full stabilizers in @xmath47 , of the initial surfaces , in one particular class of highly symmetric cases . the groups presented in the above proposition are the minimum symmetry groups enforced throughout the construction , but in general each such group will be properly contained in the symmetry group of a given initial surface ( consistent with that group ) as well as of the corresponding final minimal surface . to illustrate , consider the initial surfaces @xmath532 of type @xmath453 with @xmath533 . whatever the values of @xmath2 , @xmath103 , and @xmath464 , the full symmetry group here will always contain reflection through not just @xmath534 for all @xmath535 ( already represented in @xmath484 ) but also @xmath536 for @xmath537 odd . when @xmath103 is odd , @xmath538 and @xmath539 are equivalent under ambient isometries ( as discussed in the alignment subsection immediately preceding [ initsdef ] ) , so we may assume @xmath540 . the full symmetry group then admits @xmath541 , excluded from @xmath484 , and therefore also @xmath542 for every odd @xmath124 , because ( see [ symcomp ] ) for every integer @xmath124 the product @xmath543 . ( when @xmath544 , one has instead reflection through @xmath331 for each even @xmath124 , because @xmath545 and by assumption @xmath546 is an odd multiple of @xmath547 ) . in this case there are no other circles of reflection on @xmath304 that are parallel to @xmath8 and @xmath9 through tori right - handed along them . indeed the only such circles through which reflection preserves @xmath6 are the @xmath548 for @xmath549 . that even values of @xmath124 are inadmissible follows from the last parenthetical remark . that half - integer values are inadmissible follows also from [ symcomp ] since @xmath550 takes for example @xmath551 to @xmath552 , since @xmath553 is a nonintegral multiple of the half - period @xmath554 when @xmath103 is odd there are , however , also circles of reflection orthogonal to the @xmath331 : since @xmath313 and @xmath555 are circles of reflection of @xmath538 ( for @xmath103 odd still ) , by [ symcomp ] @xmath556 is also a circle reflection , so by [ symcomp ] again @xmath557 is too for every @xmath145 . when @xmath103 is even , @xmath538 and @xmath539 are inequivalent . the first ( @xmath540 ) surface has reflectional symmetry through @xmath331 for every integer @xmath124 ( since @xmath558 , @xmath103 is even , and @xmath559 ) . again one also has @xmath557 as a circle of reflection for every @xmath145 . because @xmath550 preserves the initial surface if and only if @xmath553 is an odd number of half - periods , one has as well reflectional symmetry through @xmath331 for every half - integer @xmath124 precisely when @xmath103 is not divisible by @xmath15 . the second ( @xmath544 ) surface has symmetry group including @xmath560 and excluding @xmath542 for every integer @xmath124 . thus @xmath556 is not a circle of reflection , but instead @xmath561 is for every @xmath562 . when @xmath103 is divisible by @xmath15 the symmetry group also includes reflection through @xmath331 for every half - integer @xmath124 ( but for no integer @xmath124 ) , but when @xmath103 is not divisible by @xmath15 there are no circles of reflection on @xmath304 parallel to @xmath8 and @xmath9 through tori right - handed along them . note that this description of the initial surfaces @xmath532 with @xmath103 even is consistent with the properties of the surfaces constructed by choe and soret in @xcite ; specifically the genus and symmetries of the @xmath540 and @xmath544 surfaces match those of , respectively , the _ odd _ and _ even _ surfaces in @xcite . [ r : unique ] note that to prove that the surfaces we construct in [ mainthm ] of type @xmath453 with @xmath103 even and @xmath533 are the same surfaces found in @xcite , it is enough to prove the uniqueness of the solutions to the plateau problems in @xcite . although this seems very likely to be true , we do not have a proof at the moment . note also that in @xcite lawson claims uniqueness for the solution to his plateau problem . every initial surface is covered by certain open sets , which we call _ extended standard regions _ , of two types . regions of the first type are indexed by the circles of intersection . given a particular initial surface @xmath50 , for any circle @xmath234 of intersection in the corresponding initial configuration we define @xmath473 ( suppressing dependence on the given initial surface ) to be the number of fundamental periods of the tower in @xmath50 wrapped around @xmath234 , so that ( recall [ initsdef ] ) @xmath473 is the product of @xmath103 with the appropriate factor involving @xmath2 or @xmath4 as well as @xmath459 , @xmath460 , or @xmath461 , depending on @xmath50 and @xmath234 : @xmath563 we similarly define @xmath564 then , recalling [ adef ] , we let @xmath565:=\left\{p \in \sigma : d_{{g_{_s}}}(p , c ) < \frac{a}{{m_{_c}}}\right\},\ ] ] where @xmath566 denotes the distance in @xmath5 between @xmath287 and @xmath234 . this region is naturally identified with a truncated karcher - scherk tower @xmath567 via the map @xmath568 \phi \left(\frac{({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})}{{m_{_c}}}\right),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath468 $ ] is an element of @xmath251 chosen so that @xmath569 = \varphi_{c , m } \left ( { \mathcal{s}_{{k_{_c}}}}(a ) \right)$ ] . sometimes we may suppress the dependence on @xmath103 , writing simply @xmath570 . in turn we define @xmath571 $ ] by @xmath572 a new constant @xmath573 , to be determined later , dictates the extent of the second type of region . it will be chosen independently of @xmath103 but large enough so that each such region closely approximates a clifford torus . regions of the second type in an initial surface @xmath50 are indexed by the connected components of the complement of the circles of intersection in the initial configuration that @xmath50 desingularizes . given such a component @xmath20 , with boundary @xmath574 , we may assume if necessary by redefining @xmath575 by precomposition with a symmetry of @xmath576 and @xmath577 by precomposition with a symmetry of @xmath578that @xmath20 has inward unit conormals @xmath579 and @xmath580 along @xmath234 and @xmath33 . then , recalling [ tower ] and for any integer @xmath581 setting @xmath582}w_j({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) \in { \mathbb{r}}^3 : { \ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}\in ( b , a+1 ] , \ , { \ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}\in { \mathbb{r}}\},\ ] ] we define @xmath583 : = { \phi_{_c}}\left(h_{{k_{_c}}}\right ) \cup \phi_{_d}\left(h_{k_{_d}}\right ) \cup ( \sigma \cap t \cap \{d_{{g_{_s}}}(\cdot , c)>b/{m_{_c}}\ } \cap d_{{g_{_s}}}(\cdot , d)>b / m_{_d}\}).\ ] ] this region is naturally identified with @xmath584 via the map @xmath585 \to t_b , \text { defined by } \\ & \varpi_{_{t , m}}(p ) = \begin{cases } { \phi_{_c}}\circ \pi_{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } } \circ { \phi_{_c}}^{-1}(p ) \text { if } p \in { \phi_{_c}}\left(h_{{k_{_c}}}\right ) \\ \phi_{_d } \circ \pi_{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } } \circ \phi_{_d}^{-1}(p ) \text { if } p \in \phi_{_d } \left(h_{k_{_d}}\right ) \\ p \text { otherwise } , \end{cases}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath586 is euclidean orthogonal projection onto the @xmath117-plane . it is immediate that @xmath587 is well - defined and smooth . given an initial surface @xmath50 , we write @xmath588 for the collection of circles of intersection in the corresponding initial configuration and @xmath589 for the collection of components of the complement of @xmath590 in the initial configuration . then @xmath591 \cup \bigcup_{t \in { \mathcal{t}}(\sigma ) } s[t]$ ] , the members of @xmath592 : c \in { \mathcal{c}}(x)\}$ ] are pairwise disjoint , the members of @xmath593 : t \in { \mathcal{t}}(\sigma)\}$ ] are pairwise disjoint , and @xmath569 \cap s[t ] = \emptyset$ ] unless @xmath594 . using the diffeomorphisms just defined , the next two propositions compare the extended standard regions , as embeddings in @xmath595 , to standard karcher - scherk towers and planes in euclidean space . [ stdtor ] let @xmath50 be an initial surface and @xmath596 a toral component . write @xmath597 for the flat metric on @xmath20 , and for each point @xmath598 let @xmath599 denote the distance from @xmath287 to the boundary circles of @xmath600 . then for every nonnegative integer @xmath30 there exists a constant @xmath601independent of @xmath103such that a. @xmath602^{\otimes 2},\ ; m^2\varpi_t^*g_{_t},\ ; e^{-m\varpi_t^*d_{{g_{_s}}}(\partial t_b,\cdot ) } \right)\right\| } \leq c(\ell)$ ] ; b. @xmath603,\ ; m^2\varpi_t^*g_{_t},\ ; e^{-m\varpi_t^*d_{{g_{_s}}}(\partial t_b,\cdot ) } \right)\right\| } \leq c(\ell)m^{-1}$ ] ; and c. @xmath604,\ ; m^2\varpi_t^*g_{_t},\ ; e^{-m\varpi_t^*d_{{g_{_s}}}(\partial t_b,\cdot ) } \right)\right\| } \leq c(\ell)m^{-1}$ ] . we select a boundary circle @xmath234 of @xmath20 and a rotation @xmath468 \in so(4)$ ] so that @xmath605 \phi(\{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}=0,\;x > 0\})$ ] . it suffices to establish the estimates within @xmath606 . using [ phullback ] we find @xmath607^*{g_{_s}}= & d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}^2 + d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}^2 + d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}^2 + \frac{\sin^2 { \ensuremath{\mathrm{r}}}- { \ensuremath{\mathrm{r}}}^2}{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{r}}}^4 } \left ( { \ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}^2\ , d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}^2 + { \ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}^2\,d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}^2 - 2{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}\,d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}\,d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}\right ) \\ & + 2\frac{\sin^2 { \ensuremath{\mathrm{r}}}}{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{r}}}^2 } \left ( { \ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}\,d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}\,d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}- { \ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}\,d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}\,d{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}\right ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] whose components and whose inverse s components have ( coordinate ) derivatives of all orders bounded on @xmath608^{-1}\mathcal{u } \subset \{\sqrt{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}}^2+{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}^2}<\pi/4\ } \subset { \mathbb{r}}^3 $ ] . moreover @xmath609 identifies @xmath610 $ ] as a graph over @xmath20 so that @xmath611 \cap \mathcal{u } = { \mathsf{r}}[c]\phi\{({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) \ ; : \ ; { \mathsf{r}}[c]\phi({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},0,{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) \in \varpi_t^{-1}\left(s[t ] \cap \mathcal{u}\right)\ } , \mbox { where } \\ & f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) = { m_{_c}}^{-1}w_{{k_{_c}}}({m_{_c}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{m_{_c}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) { \psi\left [ a+1,a \right]}({m_{_c}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{x } } } ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] recalling @xmath612 from [ tower ] . from [ towerdecay ] we have for any nonnegative integers @xmath124 and @xmath30 the existence of a constant @xmath613 ensuring the estimate @xmath614 for any @xmath615 $ ] . now , via @xmath468\phi$ ] , the coordinates @xmath616 on @xmath91 transfer to @xmath617 and the functions @xmath618 restrict to coordinates on @xmath20 , so that @xmath619 and @xmath620_{ij}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) = & \left[{g_{_s}}\right]_{ij}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) + f_{,i}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\left[{g_{_s}}\right]_{i{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) \\ & + f_{,j}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\left[{g_{_s}}\right]_{j{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) + f_{,i}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})f_{,j}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\left[{g_{_s}}\right]_{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] whence follows the estimate ( i ) for the metric , in light of [ fest ] and the boundedness of all ( coordinate ) derivatives of all components of @xmath431 and its inverse with respect to the @xmath616 coordinate system as established in [ gsph ] . assuming the normal @xmath527 on @xmath610 $ ] has positive inner product with @xmath621 , we calculate also @xmath622^{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) - f_{,k}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\left[{g_{_s}}\right]^{k { \ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) + f_{,k}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})f_{,\ell}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\left[{g_{_s}}\right]^{k \ell}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) \right)^{-\frac{1}{2 } } \cdot \\ & [ \gamma_{ij}^{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) + f_{,ij}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) + f_{,j}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\gamma_{i{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}^{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) \\ & + f_{,i}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\gamma_{j{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}^{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) + f_{,i}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})f_{,j}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\gamma_{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}^{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) \\ & - f_{,k}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\gamma_{ij}^k({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) - f_{,k}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})f_{,j}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\gamma_{i{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}^k({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) \\ & - f_{,k}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})f_{,i}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})\gamma_{j{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}^k({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) - f_{,k}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})f_{,i}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}})f_{,j}({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) \gamma_{{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{y}}}}^k({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},f({\ensuremath{\mathrm{x}}},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z}}}),{\ensuremath{\mathrm{z } } } ) ] , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath623 and each instance of @xmath624 is a christoffel symbol of @xmath431 in the @xmath616 coordinate system . noting that the squared norm of the second fundamental form of @xmath20 is simply @xmath4 and that @xmath20 is minimal , we obtain ( ii ) and ( iii ) , using again the estimates [ fest ] and the boundedness exhibited by [ gsph ] . [ stdtow ] let @xmath50 be an initial surface and @xmath625 an intersection circle . write @xmath626 for the second fundamental form of the inclusion @xmath627 relative to the rescaled euclidean metric @xmath628 and the unit normal whose pushforward by @xmath629 has positive @xmath431 inner product with @xmath527 , and set @xmath630 . then for each nonnegative integer @xmath30 there exists a constant @xmath601independent of @xmath103such that a. @xmath631^{\otimes 2},\ ; m^2g\right)\right\| } \leq c(\ell)m^{-1/2}$ ] ; b. @xmath632 , \ ; m^2g)\right\| } \leq c(\ell)m^{-1/2}$ ] ; and c. @xmath633 . from [ gsph ] @xmath634 since the second fundamental form of @xmath76 is bounded , as is each of its covariant derivatives , we obtain @xmath635 , \ , m^2 g , \ , m^{-1}+d_{{g_{_s}}}(c,\cdot ) ) \right\| } \leq c(\ell ) , \\ & { \left\| m^{-2}{\left\lverta\right\rvert}^2 - { { x_{_c}}^{-1}}^*{\left\lvert{{\widehat{a}}}_{_c}\right\rvert}^2 : c^\ell(s[c ] , \ , m^2 g , \ , m^{-1}+d_{{g_{_s}}}(c,\cdot ) ) \right\| } \leq c(\ell ) , \mbox { and } \\ & { \left\| m^{-1}h : c^\ell(s[c ] , \ , m^2 g , \ , m^{-1}+d_{{g_{_s}}}(c,\cdot ) ) \right\| } \leq c(\ell ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] establishing the estimates of the proposition on the subset of @xmath569 $ ] within the tubular neighborhood of center @xmath234 and @xmath431-radius @xmath636 . by assuming @xmath637 , we ensure that the complement of this subset falls under the regime of the preceding proposition , which in conjunction with the asymptotic geometry of @xmath576 itself completes the proof , under the further assumption that @xmath638 . given an initial surface @xmath50 , embedded in @xmath5 by @xmath639 , along with a function @xmath640 with sufficiently small @xmath641 norm , and recalling ( [ unitnormal ] ) the choice @xmath642 of global unit normal , we define the immersion @xmath643 where @xmath644 is the exponential map on @xmath530 . write @xmath645 for the global unit normal on @xmath646 which has nonnegative inner product with the velocity field for the geodesics generated by @xmath527 and write @xmath647 $ ] for the scalar mean curvature of @xmath646 relative to @xmath645 . write @xmath41 for ( recalling [ symm ] ) @xmath484 when @xmath50 is type @xmath453 and for @xmath487 when @xmath50 is type @xmath455 . the main theorem will be proven by selecting a solution @xmath648 ( the space of smooth @xmath41-odd functions on @xmath50recall [ invfun ] ) to @xmath647=0 $ ] , small enough that @xmath646 is an embedding . to that end we next study the linearization @xmath649 at @xmath126 of @xmath650 , given by @xmath651 = \left(\delta + { \left\lverta\right\rvert}^2 + 2\right)u,\ ] ] where the constant term @xmath4 arises as the ricci curvature of @xmath431 contracted twice with @xmath527 . actually , to secure bounds uniform in @xmath103 and to facilitate the comparison of this operator on the extended standard regions to certain limit operators , we focus on @xmath652 in view of the estimates of the second fundamental form contained in [ stdtor ] and [ stdtow ] , this operator is bounded for any @xmath653 . the present section is devoted to obtaining a bounded inverse by first analyzing the operator `` semilocally''meaning when restricted to spaces of functions defined on each of the various extended standard regions and by afterward applying an iteration scheme to piece together a global solution . we first solve the jacobi equation for the inclusion map @xmath438 of the exact karcher - scherk towers of standard size , given data with sufficiently small support . to avoid the introduction of substitute kernel needed in more complicated gluing constructions , we impose the symmetries @xmath41 induces on the limit tower . specifically , set @xmath654 , write @xmath655 for the second fundamental form of @xmath438 , and for each positive integer @xmath459 let @xmath656 then the jacobi operator @xmath657 defines a bounded linear map @xmath658 for any @xmath653 and integers @xmath0 and @xmath659 . given @xmath660 we recall that @xmath661 and we set @xmath662 [ towsol ] fix @xmath653 , @xmath660 , and integers @xmath0 and @xmath659 . then there exists a linear map @xmath663 and there exists a constant @xmath234depending on just @xmath664 , @xmath73 , @xmath2 , and @xmath459such that for any @xmath223 in the domain of @xmath665 we have @xmath666 and @xmath667 the proof will be completed by ( i ) introducing a conformal metric @xmath668 , ( ii ) establishing that the schrdinger operator @xmath669 acting between sobolev spaces defined with respect to this metric has discrete spectrum omitting @xmath126 , ( iii ) extracting a @xmath641 bound for solutions , and finally ( iv ) applying schauder estimates . for @xmath369 the tower @xmath76 has umbilic points where the gauss map takes vertical values , so the pullback @xmath670 of the round spherical metric @xmath431 by the gauss map , as applied in @xcite and other constructions , degenerates there . instead we will pull back the spherical metric by a different map . recall that above we studied the enneper - weierstrass representation [ weimap ] on the unit disc , which , after a similarity transformation , parametrized a half - period of @xmath76 . in fact we observe that [ weimap ] extends to a diffeomorphism @xmath671 from the extended complex plane @xmath672 punctured at the @xmath14 roots of @xmath56 to the corresponding tower modulo vertical translation by @xmath673 . moreover , the inverse extends to a covering map @xmath674 of the punctured extended plane by the full tower . by composing with the appropriate rotation , scaling , and the inverse of stereographic projection @xmath675 , we obtain a smooth covering @xmath676 ( the gauss map @xmath677 is then just @xmath678 . ) referring further to the enneper - weierstrass data [ weidata ] we deduce ( see for example @xcite or any standard reference for the classical theory of minimal surfaces ) @xmath679 so since @xmath680 we find @xmath681 so that the conformal factor @xmath682 in front of @xmath683 in [ eta ] and its reciprocal @xmath684 are bounded on the inverse image under @xmath685 of every compact subset of @xmath686 . also from [ weidata ] we find @xmath687 whence @xmath688 so that the potential term of @xmath669 is a smooth function with absolute value bounded on all @xmath76 . note that pullback @xmath689 of the conformal factor in [ eta ] is even under reflection through every line through opposite @xmath14^th^ roots of @xmath56 ; therefore ( recall the discussion of the symmetries in the proof of [ tower ] ) @xmath682 itself is in particular @xmath690-even , and so @xmath691 , like @xmath692 , takes @xmath690-odd functions to @xmath690-odd functions . for each nonnegative integer @xmath30 write @xmath693 for the sobolev space consisting of all @xmath690-odd ( in the distributional sense ) measurable functions whose weak covariant derivatives up to order @xmath30 , with respect to @xmath694 , have squared norms with finite integrals on the quotient @xmath695 ; define the @xmath693 norm of such a function to be the square root of the sum , from order @xmath126 to order @xmath30 , of these integrals . although @xmath76 is not compact ( nor is the quotient @xmath696 ) , @xmath697 is nevertheless a union of closed round hemispheres punctured on their equators : @xmath698 where the overline indicates topological closure in @xmath76 and @xmath699 is the open region on @xmath76 between two consecutive horizontal planes of symmetry ; each @xmath700 is isometric to an open round hemisphere of radius @xmath24 . thus , from a sequence bounded in @xmath701 , by applying the rellich - kondrashov lemma successively to @xmath702 contiguous such hemispheres and bearing in mind the @xmath690 equivariance , we can extract a subsequence converging in @xmath703 . using also the boundedness of @xmath704 and a standard application of the riesz representation theorem for hilbert spaces , we conclude that @xmath691 has discrete spectrum . in proposition [ nokernel ] below we show moreover that @xmath691 has trivial kernel . now , given @xmath705 , we have @xmath706 with @xmath707 , so by proposition [ nokernel ] there exists @xmath708 weakly solving @xmath709 and satisfying the estimate @xmath710 . by standard elliptic regularity theory and the bounded geometry of @xmath711 in fact @xmath712 with @xmath713 for each @xmath714 , where @xmath715 is the open ball with center @xmath287 and @xmath683 radius @xmath716 . next , from the bochner formula together with the divergence theorem , the recognition that the compactly supported smooth functions are dense in @xmath701 , and the equality @xmath717 , one secures the further estimate @xmath718 now , given @xmath719 and @xmath714 , there is a sector @xmath720 of a spherical cap ( relative to @xmath694 ) , with center @xmath287 , vertex angle @xmath242 , and radius @xmath721 , entirely contained in @xmath76 ( so missing the roots of unity at the equator ) . then , writing @xmath722 for the @xmath694 geodesic through @xmath287 , parametrized by arc length @xmath723 from @xmath287 , and with initial angle @xmath415 measured from one edge of @xmath724 to the other , we have @xmath725}(\gamma_\theta(s))v(\gamma_\theta(s ) ) ) \ , ds = \int_0^{1/4 } s\frac{d^2}{ds^2}({\psi\left [ 1/4,1/8 \right]}(\gamma_\theta(s))v(\gamma_\theta(s ) ) ) \ , ds , $ ] using the fundamental theorem of calculus and integrating by parts . integrating in @xmath415 from @xmath126 to @xmath242 and applying the cauchy - schwarz inequality yields the simple morrey - sobolev inequality @xmath726 this estimate , in conjunction with [ h2est ] and [ schauder ] , completes the proof . [ nokernel ] the operator @xmath691 acting on @xmath727 , as defined in the proof of proposition [ towsol ] , has trivial kernel . to show that @xmath691 has trivial @xmath727 kernel we will first count its nullity on the somewhat larger domain @xmath728 , where @xmath729 is the subgroup of @xmath690 having the same generators save the reflections through lines , which are excluded this count is performed by adapting the variational proofs given by montiel and ros for lemma 12 and lemma 13 in @xcite . there they calculate the multiplicity of the eigenvalues of the laplacian on the round sphere as eigenvalues of the laplacian on certain coverings of the sphere . here we are interested in the multiplicity of @xmath126 only , for the more complicated operator @xmath691 . recalling [ omegadef ] we see that @xmath730 . write @xmath731 for the space of restrictions to @xmath732 of elements of @xmath733 and write @xmath734 for the closure in @xmath733 of the space of smooth functions compactly supported in @xmath732 and invariant under the ( rotational ) symmetries of @xmath735 that preserve @xmath732 . we define the bilinear form @xmath736 on @xmath737 @xmath738 : = -(du , dv)_{l^2(\eta)}+\left(e^{-2\phi}{\left\lvert{{\widehat{a}}}\right\rvert}^2u , v\right)_{l^2(\eta)}.\ ] ] then mimicking @xcite , we define the subspace @xmath739 of @xmath733 by @xmath740 = \lambda ( u , v)_{l^2(\eta ) } \right\rangle \\ & \,\,\ , \oplus \ , \bigoplus_{j=2}^{2n } \left\langle \left . h^1_{0 , { { \widehat{\mathscr{h}}}}}(\omega_j,\eta ) \ ; \right| \ ; \exists \lambda \geq 0 \;\ ; \forall v \in h^1_{0,{{\widehat{\mathscr{h}}}}}(\omega_j,\eta ) \;\ ; b_{{{\widehat{l}}}_\eta,\omega_j}[u , v ] = \lambda ( u , v)_{l^2(\eta ) } \right\rangle , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and the vector space @xmath741 by @xmath742 = \lambda ( u , v)_{l^2(\eta ) } \right\rangle \\ & \,\,\ , \oplus \ , \bigoplus_{j=2}^{2n } \left\langle \left . h^1_{{{\widehat{\mathscr{h}}}}}(\omega_j,\eta ) \ ; \right| \ ; \exists \lambda>0 \;\ ; \forall v \in h^1_{{{\widehat{\mathscr{h}}}}}(\omega_j,\eta ) \;\ ; b_{{{\widehat{l}}}_\eta,\omega_j}[u , v ] = \lambda ( u , v)_{l^2(\eta ) } \right\rangle , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the first equation we take the direct sum within @xmath733 , while in the second we use the abstract direct sum , and in both equations angled brackets indicate the linear span in @xmath733 . using the variational characterization of eigenvalues and the unique - continuation principle we find as in @xcite that ( i ) orthogonal projection in @xmath733 onto the subspace spanned by the @xmath743 eigenfunctions with strictly negative eigenvalues has injective restriction to @xmath739 and ( ii ) orthogonal projection in @xmath744 onto @xmath741 has injective restriction ( after precomposition with the obvious inclusion ) to the subspace of @xmath733 spanned by @xmath743 eigenfunctions with nonpositive eigenvalues according to lemma [ hemisphere ] below @xmath743 on @xmath745 ( with dirichlet condition ) has one - dimensional kernel and no strictly negative eigenvalues , so from ( i ) in the preceding paragraph we deduce that @xmath743 on @xmath733 has at least @xmath746 strictly negative eigenvalues , counted with multiplicity . on the other hand lemma [ hemisphere ] also states that @xmath743 on @xmath731 with neumann condition has trivial kernel and precisely one simple negative eigenvalue , so from ( ii ) in the preceding paragraph we deduce that @xmath743 on @xmath733 has no more than @xmath702 nonnegative eigenvalues , counted with multiplicity . thus @xmath691 has nullity at most one on @xmath733 . since the vertical component of the gauss map is a jacobi field for @xmath76 and is @xmath735 but not @xmath690 equivariant , we see that the @xmath701 kernel of @xmath691 is indeed trivial . [ hemisphere ] for each @xmath145 , with notation as in [ omegadef ] and the proof of proposition [ nokernel ] , a. @xmath743 on @xmath734 ( with dirichlet boundary condition ) has @xmath24-dimensional kernel and no strictly negative eignevalues , and b. @xmath743 on @xmath731 with neumann boundary condition has trivial kernel and exactly one simple negative eigenvalue . the hemisphere @xmath700 with its pole deleted is conformal , via stereographic projection ( from the antipodal pole ) and a logarithm , to the standard half - cylinder with flat metric . concretely , using polar coordinates on the unit disc pulled back by the same stereographic projection to @xmath732 , we have @xmath747 we find ( recall [ potential ] ) that for the corresponding operator @xmath748 we have @xmath749 evidently @xmath750 , so whenever @xmath195 is an eigenfunction of the flat laplacian @xmath751 , @xmath752 is an eigenfunction ( when nonzero ) of @xmath753 with the same eigenvalue . moreover @xmath754 and @xmath755 are linearly independent for every real @xmath756 except @xmath757 and obviously @xmath758 . corresponding to the latter exception we have for @xmath759 the linearly independent eigenfunctions @xmath760 and @xmath761 with eigenvalue @xmath126 . as for the former exception , noting that we have already accounted for the eigenfunction @xmath762 of @xmath759 with eigenvalue @xmath763 and that @xmath764 , we find that nonzero @xmath195 solving @xmath765 is another , independent such eigenfunction . thus we deduce that an eigenfunction for @xmath766 of the form @xmath767 with eigenvalue @xmath768 has radial factor @xmath769 a linear combination of @xmath770 and @xmath771 given by @xmath772 or a linear combination of @xmath773 and @xmath774 in case @xmath775 or a linear combination of @xmath776 and @xmath777 in case @xmath778 . separating variables , we need only consider eigenfunctions of the above form , and , because of the rotational symmetries imposed , @xmath30 must take values in @xmath779 . now suppose @xmath780 on @xmath732 . then @xmath781 as well , on @xmath732 punctured at its pole @xmath782 , so @xmath783 and @xmath784 for some constants @xmath785 and @xmath786 , unless @xmath787 , in which case @xmath788 . ( the other exceptional case of @xmath757 is excluded by the symmetries . ) if we impose dirichlet conditions , we find @xmath789 when @xmath790 , but then @xmath791 is singular at @xmath792 unless @xmath793 , which must therefore hold , since @xmath767 is an eigenfunction on all @xmath732 . on the other hand @xmath794 while @xmath795 , so @xmath796 when @xmath758 . thus dirichlet @xmath691 has kernel spanned by @xmath797 , confirming the nullity asserted in ( i ) . if we instead impose neumann conditions , since @xmath798 ( again @xmath757 is excluded by the symmetries ) , we find @xmath799 when @xmath790 , so again we need @xmath793 to avoid a singularity at @xmath792 . on the other hand @xmath800 while @xmath801 , so in this case @xmath802 , but @xmath803 is also singular at @xmath792 . thus neumann @xmath691 indeed has trivial kernel , as claimed in ( ii ) . for @xmath804 one can not expect agreement of solutions to @xmath805 and to @xmath806 , but the variational characterization of eigenvalues reveals that the number ( counting multiplicity ) of strictly negative ( dirichlet or neumann ) eigenvalues will agree for the two operators , at least on compact subsets of @xmath807 , where the conformal factor is bounded with bounded inverse . furthermore , again using the variational characterization of eigenvalues one sees that for @xmath808 sufficiently small , the number ( counted with multiplicity ) of strictly negative eigenvalues for @xmath691 on @xmath732 with dirichlet condition on the equator is the same as the number of strictly negative eigenvalues of @xmath691 on @xmath732 less a spherical cap @xmath809 with radius @xmath810 and center the pole @xmath126 , imposing dirichlet conditions on both the equator and boundary of the cap . ( to show the former number is at least the latter extend test functions vanishing on @xmath811 to test functions vanishing on @xmath809 ; for the reverse inequality use a logarithmic cut - off , identically @xmath126 on @xmath809 and identically @xmath24 on @xmath812 . ) likewise , assuming @xmath810 small enough , the number of strictly negative eigenvalues of @xmath691 on @xmath732 with neumann condition on the equator is the same as the number of strictly negative eigenvalues of @xmath691 on @xmath813 with neumann condition on the equator and dirichlet condition on @xmath811 . now suppose @xmath814 is an eigenfunction of @xmath691 on @xmath813 with strictly negative eigenvalue , imposing either of the above boundary conditions . then @xmath815 , so in particular @xmath804 . if @xmath816 , then @xmath817 . if we impose the dirichlet condition on the equatorial circle @xmath818 , then , since @xmath819 and @xmath820 , we must have @xmath802 , but @xmath821 , so the dirichlet condition on @xmath822 means @xmath796 as well . thus there are no such dirichlet eigenfunctions . if instead we impose the neumann condition on @xmath818 , then , since @xmath823 and @xmath824 , we need @xmath796 , but @xmath825 vanishes only at @xmath792 , so the dirichlet condition on @xmath822 means @xmath802 too . thus there are no such neumann eigenfunctions either . now assume @xmath826 . then @xmath827 . as when studying the kernel above , imposition of the dirichlet condition @xmath818 forces @xmath789 , but a quick calculation shows that imposition of the dirichlet condition on @xmath822 then requires @xmath828 = ( k-1 ) \tanh [ ( k-1 ) \ln \epsilon]$ ] . since for every real @xmath829 the function @xmath830 is even and on @xmath831 strictly monotonic , this last condition implies @xmath757 , contradicting the initial assumption of the paragraph and completing the proof of ( i ) . imposing instead the neumann condition on @xmath818 forces @xmath799 , so the dirichlet condition on @xmath822 now demands @xmath832 = ( k-1 ) \tanh [ ( k-1 ) \ln \epsilon]$ ] . for any @xmath808 the function on the left is even in @xmath833 , strictly monotonic in @xmath833 on @xmath831 , and has limit @xmath834 as @xmath833 goes to @xmath126 ; moreover , as @xmath810 tends to @xmath126 , the right - hand side goes to @xmath835 . thus this equation has exactly one solution , completing the proof of ( ii ) . [ r : nk ] a simpler proof of [ hemisphere ] is also possible using the @xmath836 metric instead of the @xmath694 metric and without reference to the @xmath837 operators . [ towsol ] can also be proved without using the @xmath694 metric . now we state some estimates for solutions to the poisson equation @xmath838 on the euclidean strip @xmath839 of given width @xmath840 , with @xmath841 subject to dirichlet data and @xmath223 odd under reflection through the horizontal line @xmath842 for given @xmath843 and every @xmath145 . we set @xmath844 in the applications to follow , @xmath845 will tend to infinity with @xmath103 , while @xmath846 will be bounded independently of @xmath103 , so it is important that the estimates here do not depend on @xmath845 . the additional decay estimate included in the proposition will be necessary to guarantee convergence of the iterative scheme used to construct global solutions on the initial surfaces . [ torsol ] with notation as in the preceding paragraph , given @xmath847 and @xmath653 , there exists a linear map @xmath848 and there exists a constant @xmath849depending on @xmath664 and @xmath846 but not on @xmath845such that if @xmath850 and @xmath851 , then @xmath852 , @xmath841 vanishes on @xmath853 , and @xmath854 moreover , if @xmath223 vanishes outside @xmath855 \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] for @xmath856 , then @xmath857 where @xmath23 is the coordinate on the @xmath858 $ ] factor of @xmath859 . define @xmath860 to be the dirichlet solution @xmath841 to the poisson equation @xmath861 . then @xmath862 and for each @xmath863 @xmath864 where @xmath715 is the intersection with @xmath859 of the euclidean disc with center @xmath287 and radius @xmath716 . defining @xmath865 for each positive integer @xmath459 we have @xmath866 for which equation one finds dirichlet green s function @xmath867 since @xmath868 we have @xmath869 ) } \leq \frac{y^2}{n^2}{\left\|f_n\right\|}_{c^0([0,x\pi ] ) } \leq \frac{\sqrt{2y^5\pi}}{n^2}{\left\|f\right\|}_{c^0(t_x}),\ ] ] and so @xmath870 which upgrades the local schauder estimates above to the first inequality asserted in the proposition . if moreover @xmath223 vanishes outside @xmath855 \times { \mathbb{r}}$ ] , then @xmath871}(x ) = \frac{u_n(a ) \sinh \frac{nx}{y}}{\sinh \frac{na}{y } } \mbox { and } \\ & u_n|_{[b , x\pi]}(x ) = \frac{u_n(b ) \sinh \frac{n(x\pi - x)}{y}}{\sinh \frac{n(x\pi - b)}{y } } , \end{aligned}\ ] ] establishing in conjunction with [ modest ] the decay estimates . the final task of this section is to apply propositions [ towsol ] and [ torsol ] iteratively on the extended standard regions to prove existence and obtain estimates of global solutions to the equation @xmath872 on each initial surface . [ rcal ] fix @xmath653 and data @xmath873 or @xmath874 for an initial surface . there is a positive integer @xmath875 such that for every @xmath876 and for every initial surface @xmath50 defined by the corresponding data there exists a linear map @xmath877 and there exists a constant @xmath849independent of @xmath103such that if @xmath878 , then @xmath879 and @xmath880 for @xmath596 with boundary circles @xmath881 , set @xmath882 and define the diffeomorphism ( recalling definitions [ stdef ] and [ txdef ] ) @xmath883,\ ] ] the cutoff function @xmath884)$ ] , and the linear map @xmath885,m^2 g ) \to c_{{\mathscr{g}}}^{2,\beta}(s[t],m^2g)\ ] ] by @xmath886 } \circ x + { \psi\left [ a_t , a_t-1 \right ] } \circ x \right ) , \mbox { and } \\ & x_{_t } : = \varpi_t^{-1 } \circ \kappa , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath887 is any isometry mapping @xmath888 to a scaffold circle on the torus containing @xmath600 . for @xmath625 recall the diffeomorphism @xmath889\ ] ] and define the cutoff function @xmath890)$ ] and the linear map @xmath891,m^2g)\ ] ] by @xmath892 } \circ { \ensuremath{\mathrm{r}}}\right ) . \end{aligned}\ ] ] next , given @xmath893 , let @xmath894{\mathcal{r}}_tf|_{s[t ] } , \\ & f_2 : = \sum_{c \in { \mathcal{c}}(\sigma ) } [ \psi_{_c},m^{-2}{\mathcal{l } } ] { \mathcal{r}}_cf_1|_{s[c ] } , \mbox { and } \\ & \widetilde{{\mathcal{r } } } f : = \sum_{t \in { \mathcal{t}}(\sigma ) } \psi_t{\mathcal{r}}_t ( f+f_2)|_{s[t ] } + \sum_{c \in { \mathcal{c}}(\sigma ) } \psi_c{\mathcal{r}}_c f_1|_{s[c]}. \end{aligned}\ ] ] the idea behind the definition of @xmath895 is as follows . first we construct approximate solutions on each toral region ( the @xmath896}$ ] terms ) and cut them off smoothly . these solutions are only approximate since we have obtained them by applying the solution operator for the model problem on the euclidean strip , and the resulting error is controlled by the deviation of the initial surface s geometry from the model geometry . additional error , supported in the tower regions , is created by cutting off the approximate solution with @xmath897 . we know only that its size is controlled by that of the original @xmath223 , and we account for it in @xmath898 along with the restriction of the original @xmath223 to the tower regions , where we next construct and cut off approximate solutions in a similar fashion . again there is error controlled by the geometry and also cutoff error , for which we have no better bound than the norm of @xmath223 but which is supported inside the toral regions far from their boundary , so we can construct an approximate solution to correct for them and apply the decay estimate in [ towsol ] . more precisely we now check that @xmath899 } \\ & + \sum_{t \in { \mathcal{t}}(\sigma ) } \left ( { x_{_t}^*}^{-1}\delta_{{g_{_e}}}x_t^*-m^{-2}{\mathcal{l}}\right ) { \mathcal{r}}_t \left(f+f_2\right)|_{s[t ] } \\ & + \sum_{t \in { \mathcal{t}}(\sigma ) } \left [ \psi_{_t } , m^{-2}{\mathcal{l}}\right ] { \mathcal{r}}_t f_2|_{s[t ] } , \end{aligned}\ ] ] so , noting that @xmath900}$ ] is supported far away from @xmath901 $ ] , we find from [ stdtor ] , [ stdtow ] , [ towsol ] , and [ torsol ] @xmath902 where @xmath903 is a constant depending on @xmath73 but not on @xmath103 and where @xmath234 is a constant depending on neither @xmath73 nor @xmath103 . thus we may at this stage fix @xmath73 ( finally determining the extent of the toral regions ) sufficiently large in terms of @xmath234 and then take @xmath103 sufficiently large in terms of @xmath903 so as to ensure that @xmath904 is invertible . the proof is then concluded by taking @xmath905 . recall that given an initial surface @xmath50 with defining embedding @xmath639 and a function @xmath906 , we have defined the map @xmath907 by @xmath908 , @xmath909 being the exponential map on @xmath5 and @xmath527 a global unit normal for the initial surface . for @xmath910 sufficiently small @xmath646 is an immersion with well - defined mean curvature @xmath647 $ ] relative to the global unit normal @xmath645 having positive inner product with the parallel translates of @xmath527 along the geodesics it generates . we now prove the main theorem by solving @xmath647=0 $ ] . [ mainthm ] given data ( a ) @xmath873 or ( b ) @xmath874 for an initial surface ( recalling [ initsdef ] ) , there exist @xmath911 and @xmath849 such that whenever @xmath912 , the initial embedding @xmath639 corresponding to the data can be perturbed to a minimal embedding @xmath907 by a function @xmath648 ( depending on @xmath103 ) that satisfies the estimate @xmath913 . here @xmath41 is either ( a ) @xmath484 or ( b ) @xmath487 ( recalling [ symm ] ) . in particular @xmath914 has the same genus as @xmath50 ( see [ initsprop ] ) , is invariant under @xmath41 , and contains the scaffolding ( a ) @xmath389 or ( b ) @xmath394 ( recalling [ scaff ] ) . moreover , in the complement in @xmath5 of any tubular neighborhood of the circles of intersection of the initial configuration ( a ) @xmath6 or ( b ) @xmath11 , for @xmath103 sufficiently large @xmath914 is the graph over some subset of the initial configuration of a smooth function converging smoothly to @xmath126 as @xmath915 . fix @xmath916 . by [ stdtor ] and [ stdtow ] the initial mean curvature satisfies @xmath917 : c^{2,2\beta}(\sigma , m^2g)\right\| } \leq cm^{-3/2}\ ] ] for a constant @xmath234 independent of @xmath103 . setting @xmath918,\ ] ] then [ rcal ] implies that @xmath919 for a ( possibly different ) constant @xmath234 independent of @xmath103 . the function @xmath920 represents the first - order correction to the initial surface . to complete the perturbation we need to estimate the nonlinear part of @xmath650 near @xmath126 , defined by @xmath921 : = { \mathcal{h}}[u ] - { \mathcal{h}}[0 ] - { \mathcal{l}}u.\ ] ] to proceed efficiently we consider the blown - up metric @xmath922 on @xmath5 . given @xmath906 we can define @xmath923 by @xmath924 , where @xmath925 is the exponential map on @xmath595 and @xmath926 is the @xmath922 unit normal for @xmath50 parallel to @xmath527 ; of course @xmath927 , @xmath928 , and @xmath929 . for @xmath930 sufficiently small we can define also @xmath931 $ ] to be the mean curvature of @xmath932 relative to @xmath922 ( and @xmath933 ) . obviously @xmath934 = m{\mathcal{h}}_{m^2{g_{_s}}}[mu],\ ] ] so @xmath935 = m^{-2}\int_0 ^ 1 \int_0^t \frac{d^2}{ds^2}{\mathcal{h}}[su ] \ , ds \ , dt = m^{-1 } \int_0 ^ 1 \int_0^t \frac{d^2}{ds^2}{\mathcal{h}}_{m^2g_s}[smu ] \ , ds \ , dt.\ ] ] now , if @xmath936 is sufficiently small in terms of the riemannian curvature of @xmath595 and the second fundamental form of @xmath845 relative to @xmath922 , then @xmath646 will be an immersion , @xmath647 $ ] will be well - defined , and moreover @xmath937 } { \left\|\frac{d^2}{ds^2}{\mathcal{h}}_{m^2g_s}[smu ] : c^{0,2\beta}(\sigma , m^2g)\right\| } \leq c{\left\|mu : c^{2,2\beta}(\sigma , m^2g)\right\|}^2,\ ] ] where @xmath234 is a constant controlled by finitely many covariant derivatives of the riemannian curvature of the ambient space @xmath595 and finitely many covariant derivatives of the second fundamental form of @xmath845 relative to @xmath922 . of course the riemannian curvature of @xmath595 is bounded uniformly in @xmath103 ( tending to @xmath126 in fact ) and all of its derivatives vanish ; while @xmath845 itself depends on @xmath103 , each derivative of its second fundamental form , relative to @xmath922 , is bounded independently of @xmath103 . consequently , if @xmath42 is the closed ball of radius @xmath938 in @xmath939 and @xmath940 , we have @xmath941 : c^{2,2\beta}(\sigma , m^2g)\right\| } \leq cm^{-2}.\ ] ] evidently then , taking @xmath103 large enough , @xmath942 $ ] defines a map @xmath943 which is continuous with respect to the @xmath944 norm on @xmath42 as well as the @xmath939 norm , so by the schauder fixed point theorem admits a fixed point @xmath945 . accordingly @xmath946 $ ] and @xmath947 = { \mathcal{h}}[0 ] + { \mathcal{l}}u_0 + { \mathcal{l}}v_0 + { \mathcal{q}}[u_0+v_0 ] = 0.\ ] ] the higher regularity of @xmath948 then follows immediately , and the @xmath641 decay estimate of @xmath949 ensures embeddedness . in this subsection we briefly outline a highly symmetric construction where the symmetry imposed is not so great that there are no obstructions . the obstruction space is nontrivial but of finite dimension independent of the symmetries and the genus of the surfaces constructed . the construction can easily be explained in terms of the earlier presentation : the initial configuration used is @xmath11 and the symmetry group imposed is @xmath484 ( and not @xmath487 ) . this corresponds to using the scaffolding @xmath950 . the towers desingularizing @xmath8 and @xmath9 are then symmetric enough that they carry no kernel . the construction in this respect can proceed as the earlier one in [ mainthm ] . on the other hand the towers desingularizing the circles @xmath951 are classical scherk singly periodic surfaces and the symmetries imposed fix @xmath320 but not @xmath304 . this situation is similar to many recent constructions @xcite where there is enough symmetry to simplify the obstruction space in comparison to the more general situation in @xcite , but not enough to render it trivial as in [ mainthm ] . more precisely we have a two - dimensional kernel , one dimension for each circle of intersection @xmath555 and @xmath952 . ( note that modulo the symmetries these are the only circles of intersection besides @xmath8 and @xmath9 ) . there are no circles in the scaffolding contained in @xmath304 and therefore @xmath304 is not held fixed by the construction . we introduce then two continuous parameters in the construction , @xmath953 and @xmath954 . @xmath555 is replaced by a parallel copy on @xmath376 at ( signed ) distance @xmath953 and similarly @xmath952 is replaced by a parallel copy on @xmath377 at ( signed ) distance @xmath954 . by the symmetries then all @xmath331 are appropriately replaced also . @xmath304 is a union of annuli with boundaries the @xmath331 . these are replaced then by minimal graphs so that the new annuli span the @xmath331 s . this way @xmath304 is replaced by a new torus with derivative discontinuities along its circles of intersection with the @xmath320 s . the construction of the initial surfaces then proceeds as usual by using towers appropriately . note that modulo the symmetries there are four circles which get desingularized : @xmath955 and the ( perturbed to new positions ) @xmath956 . following the same conventions as in section [ sinit ] we denote by @xmath957 the number of half periods the desingularizing towers will have between successive circles of reflection in @xmath389 along @xmath958 respectively . this together with three alignment parameters @xmath959 and the continuous parameters @xmath953 and @xmath954 determine the initial surfaces . we have the following . [ thm-2 ] given data @xmath960 for an initial surface as outlined above there exists @xmath911 such that whenever @xmath912 , one of the initial surfaces ( for some appropriate values of @xmath961 ) described above can be perturbed to a minimal surface which contains @xmath389 , is symmetric under the action of @xmath484 , and has genus @xmath962 . moreover as @xmath963 the minimal surfaces converge as varifolds to @xmath11 . in this subsection we discuss corollaries in our setting of a general desingularization theorem announced in ( * ? ? ? * theorem f ) and ( * ? ? ? * theorem 3.1 ) . the statement of this theorem is motivated in @xcite , and its proof is outlined in detail in @xcite and will be presented in detail in @xcite . we will refer to this theorem in the rest of the discussion as the `` general theorem '' . the general theorem applies to situations where the intersection curves are transverse and have double points only , because the corresponding general construction is understood only when classical scherk surfaces are used to model the desingularizing regions in the vicinity of the intersection curves . therefore we can only consider the cases where the initial configurations in our setting are @xmath964 or @xmath965 ( recall [ e : wk ] ) excluding the possibility @xmath966 . recall that in the first case we have two clifford tori @xmath376 and @xmath377 intersecting orthogonally along two totally orthogonal circles @xmath8 and @xmath9 . in the second case we have three pairwise orthogonal clifford tori @xmath967 with six intersection circles @xmath8 , @xmath9 , @xmath555 , @xmath952 , @xmath968 , and @xmath969 , where we also have @xmath970={\mathbb{t}}[c'_4]$ ] , @xmath971={\mathbb{t}}[c'_1]$ ] , @xmath372={\mathbb{t}}[c_2]$ ] , @xmath972 , @xmath973 , and @xmath974 , as follows from [ e : cp ] , [ e : cpperp ] , and [ e : cpinter ] with @xmath16 . following the general theorem we define @xmath975 and @xmath976 or @xmath977 ( recall [ e : wk ] ) the abstract surfaces with connected components the closures of the connected components of @xmath978 or @xmath979 . recall now that by the discussion of the clifford tori in section [ initial ] , any clifford torus @xmath247 is covered isometrically by @xmath78 with deck transformations generated by @xmath980 and @xmath981 . the linearized operator for the mean curvature is @xmath982 , which clearly has a four dimensional kernel with basis @xmath983 where @xmath984 are the standard coordinates on @xmath78 . an alternative basis is given by @xmath985 the existence of kernel means that the general theorem can not be applied unless we impose enough symmetry to ensure that the kernel modulo the symmetries becomes trivial . to impose these symmetries we consider the scaffolding @xmath986 defined by @xmath987 ( recall [ e : cphph ] ) and the corresponding group @xmath988 . it is easy to calculate then that @xmath989 note that for @xmath990 we have @xmath991 , @xmath992 , @xmath993 , and @xmath994 . if we impose @xmath995 as the group of symmetries of the construction , then @xmath996 has to be contained in the nodal lines of any eigenfunction allowed by the symmetries on @xmath376 . @xmath376 this way is subdivided into two flat squares of side length @xmath345 . the eigenvalues for the laplacian on each square with dirichlet boundary data are of the form @xmath997 with @xmath998 . @xmath15 is not included then . working similarly on @xmath377 we conclude that there is no kernel modulo the symmetries on @xmath964 . we have also to check that there is no kernel on @xmath976 . in this case we have to impose an extra dirichlet condition on @xmath9 , and then @xmath376 ( or @xmath377 ) is subdivided into four flat rectangles of sides @xmath345 by @xmath236 and the eigenvalues allowed are @xmath999 with @xmath1000 , and so @xmath15 is again not included . we study now the case of @xmath384 . first we check that there is no kernel on @xmath304 . because of the symmetry @xmath1001 we can assume that we are working on a rectangular ( instead of a square ) flat torus with sides of length @xmath1002 and @xmath1003 . the eigenvalues of the laplacian then are @xmath1004 with @xmath1005 , which do not include @xmath15 . to check that there is no kernel on @xmath1006 note first that on @xmath376 dirichlet conditions are imposed on @xmath8 , @xmath9 , @xmath313 , @xmath555 , and @xmath1007 . this subdivides @xmath376 into eight flat rectangles of sides @xmath242 by @xmath345 where the laplacian with dirichlet conditions on the boundary have eigenvalues @xmath1008 with @xmath998 . similarly for @xmath377 so it remains only to check @xmath304 . this has dirichlet conditions imposed on @xmath555 , @xmath952 , @xmath1007 , and @xmath1009 . @xmath304 is then subdivided into four flat cylindrical annuli of width @xmath242 and so without even using the symmetries we have that the smallest eigenvalue is @xmath1010 so that @xmath15 is again not included . applying then the general desingularization theorem announced in ( * ? ? ? * theorem f ) and ( * ? ? ? * theorem 3.1 ) we have the following as a corollary . [ thm-3 ] @xmath964 can be desingularized to produce embedded closed minimal surfaces in @xmath5 symmetric under @xmath995 of genus @xmath1011 , where the towers desingularizing @xmath8 and @xmath9 include @xmath460 and @xmath461 periods respectively , provided @xmath460 and @xmath461 are large enough in absolute terms . as @xmath1012 the minimal surfaces tend to @xmath964 . similarly @xmath384 can be desingularized to produce embedded closed minimal surfaces in @xmath5 symmetric under @xmath995 of genus @xmath1013 , where the towers desingularizing @xmath8 and @xmath9 include @xmath460 and @xmath461 periods respectively , the towers desingularizing @xmath555 and @xmath1007 include @xmath462 periods , and the towers desingularizing @xmath952 and @xmath1009 include @xmath1014 periods , provided @xmath957 are large enough in absolute terms . as @xmath1015 the minimal surfaces tend to @xmath384 . note that the main difference of this result compared with the earlier ones is the small symmetry imposed and and that the ( still large ) number of periods along each circle can be prescribed independently on each circle ( except for the identifications by the symmetries of @xmath555 with @xmath1007 and @xmath952 with @xmath1009 ) , as opposed to requiring that all numbers have a large common divisor @xmath103 . Abstract:
[ "for each integer @xmath0 , we apply gluing methods to construct sequences of minimal surfaces embedded in the round @xmath1-sphere . we produce two types of sequences , all desingularizing collections of intersecting clifford tori . sequences of the first type converge to a collection of @xmath2 clifford tori intersecting with maximal symmetry along these two circles . near each of the circles , after rescaling , the sequences converge smoothly on compact subsets to a karcher - scherk tower of order @xmath2 . sequences of the second type desingularize a collection of the same @xmath2 clifford tori supplemented by an additional clifford torus equidistant from the original two circles of intersection , so that the latter torus orthogonally intersects each of the former @xmath2 tori along a pair of disjoint orthogonal circles , near which the corresponding rescaled sequences converge to a singly periodic scherk surface . the simpler examples of the first type resemble surfaces constructed by choe and soret @xcite by different methods where the number of handles desingularizing each circle is the same . there is a plethora of new examples which are more complicated and on which the number of handles for the two circles differs . examples of the second type are new as well ." ]
20,440
20,440
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: topological insulators ( tis ) are amongst the most actively investigated systems in condensed matter physics @xcite . in reality , there is evidence for their existence in two @xcite and three @xcite spatial dimensions . due to bulk - boundary correspondence , non - trivial topological states of matter have edge states at their boundaries with peculiar transport and optical properties . for instance , the two - dimensional ( 2d ) , time - reversal symmetric quantum spin hall state that is realized in hg(cd)te quantum wells ( qws ) is known to come along with helical edge states that are protected against elastic backscattering of non - magnetic impurities @xcite . however , not only the edge state physics of these systems is interesting but also the 2d bulk physics bears exciting novelties . the low - energy excitations of hg(cd)te qws are described by a model the bernevig - hughes - zhang ( bhz ) model @xcite that interpolates between the limiting cases of schrdinger and dirac fermions . this interplay between schrdinger and dirac physics constitutes an opportunity for new phenomena to emerge . we have , for instance , recently discovered collective charge excitations at zero doping , i.e. intrinsic plasmons , in this system which are absent in both separate limits @xcite . in this article , we complement our study of the screening properties and the collective charge excitations of hg(cd)te qws on the basis of random phase approximation ( rpa ) , and hence present a comprehensive analysis of its polarization function in the static and full dynamic limit , at zero and finite doping . continuously tuning the parameters of the bhz model , we reproduce the limits of pure dirac and pure schrdinger fermions and explore intermediate regimes , in order to understand how analogies and differences emerge . we support our numerical calculations of the polarization functions with analytical expressions derived by f - sum rules . in the static limit , we calculate the screening properties due to the intrinsic system and at finite doping , analyzing the induced charge density ( with friedel oscillations ) in response to a charged impurity . different to the dirac fermion system graphene , where static screening in the intrinsic limit is momentum independent and can therefore be absorbed into an effective dielectric constant @xcite , the bhz model shows a significant momentum dependence that translates into a finite extent of the induced charge density . in the dynamic limit , we are particularly interested in a better understanding of the plasmon excitations of this system away from zero doping where we previously found a new plasmon due to the interplay between schrdinger and dirac fermion physics @xcite . at finite doping , under certain conditions specified below that are e.g. applicable to hg(cd)te qws , we find a coexistence between this novel ( interband ) plasmon and an ordinary ( intraband ) plasmon . both plasmons can be rather weakly damped by single - particle excitations and should therefore be observable . interestingly , the two plasmons respond to the topology of the bandstructure with a distinctive behavior . they seem to merge one into the other in a normal insulating phase , while they remain clearly resolved when the system realizes a topological insulator . generally , rpa is known to provide reliable predictions at large densities and in systems with a large number of fermionic degrees of freedom . while its validity was indeed questioned for the intrinsic dirac limit , where the system is unable to screen the coulomb interaction and strong renormalization effects are expected @xcite , rpa has been shown to yield a quantitative description of many - body effects in graphene @xcite . it has been widely used for the study of plasmons in the dirac model , including various forms of ( multilayer ) graphene and ti surface states , see ref . for a comprehensive review . closely related to our work , the intraband plasmons of black phosphorous have been studied on the basis of rpa and an extended version of the bhz model including anisotropy @xcite . a similar study has been done for mos@xmath0 @xcite . our article is organized as follows . in sec . [ sec_model ] , we introduce the bhz model and present the general formalism we employ to calculate the static and dynamical dielectric function and the induced charge density . the nature of the nontrivial pseudospin , the origin of possible interband plasmons , experimentally relevant parameters and the different contributions to the f - sum rule are also discussed here . subsequently , in sec . [ sec_undoped ] , we present the static screening properties , the dynamical excitation spectrum ( new interband plasmon ) and the f - sum rule in the undoped regime . here we revisit and go beyond the results from ref . . [ sec_doped ] , this analysis is extended to the case of finite doping where inter- and intraband excitations equally matter . we begin by discussing the ability of the bhz model to interpolate between dirac and schrdinger physics . afterwards , we have a closer look at parameters which are experimentally relevant for hg(cd)te qws , see sec . [ sec : hg(cd)te quantum wells ] . in this limit , we find a coexistence of inter- and intraband plasmons occuring for energies and momenta which are suitable for raman or electron loss spectroscopy . we close this chapter by investigating the influence of a non - trivial topology on the plasmonic excitation spectrum . finally , in sec . [ sec_con ] , a conclusion and a brief outlook are given . the bhz hamiltonian @xcite for a two - dimensional electron gas ( 2deg ) near the @xmath1-point has the form @xmath2 here @xmath3 are the pauli matrices associated with the band - pseudospin degree of freedom ( band @xmath4 and @xmath5 in hg(cd)te quantum wells ( qws ) ) , @xmath6 , @xmath7 with @xmath8 . the system possesses time - reversal symmetry and @xmath9 is block diagonal in the kramer s partner or spin degree of freedom . restricting ourselves to the block @xmath10 , the results can be extended to the other one by applying the time reversal operator . @xmath10 describes fermions with intermediate properties between a dirac and a conventional 2deg system . the off - diagonal term ( @xmath11 parameter ) is typical for a dirac system ( @xmath12 in graphene ) , with @xmath13 the dirac mass ( corresponding to a gap of @xmath14 ) . we consider positive and negative masses , where the latter one corresponds to an inversion of the bandstructure and the system is topologically non - trivial @xcite . for simplicity , we restrict ourselves to a bandstructure with a minimum at the @xmath1-point , which limits the mass to @xmath15 . in analogy to a 2deg , the diagonal elements bear kinetic energy elements which preserve ( @xmath16 parameter ) and break ( @xmath17 parameter ) particle - hole ( p - h ) symmetry ( @xmath18 for schrdinger fermions with @xmath19 the quasi - particle mass ) . the eigenstates of eq . ( [ eq : hamiltonian ] ) are described by the following dispersion and pseudospin @xmath20 with @xmath21 for valence and conduction band . note that we consider electrons to be perfectly localized on the 2d x - y plane and therefore we neglect the real shapes of the envelope functions due to the quantum confinement along @xmath22 direction @xcite . the bhz model is characterized by intrinsic scales for momentum , @xmath23 , and energy , @xmath24 , which reflect the interpolating character of the model between dirac ( @xmath11 parameter ) and schrdinger ( @xmath16 parameter ) system . fermi momentum @xmath25 and chemical potential @xmath26 provide externally tunable momentum and energy scales , which we call fermi scales in the following . we expect the ratio between fermi and intrinsic scales to govern the physics of this system . we therefore define the dimensionless quantities @xmath27 where we set @xmath28 in the following . @xmath29 is defined to be the energy to the wave vector @xmath30 , such that @xmath31 if @xmath32 . for @xmath33 , we therefore expect intermediate physics , while in the limit @xmath34 ( @xmath35 ) the dirac ( 2deg ) physics should be recovered . the linear response of an homogeneous system to an external applied potential is described by the density - density generalized susceptibility or retarded polarization function @xmath36 . this response comprises two main phenomena : screening , described by the real part @xmath37 $ ] , and dissipation by single - particle excitations ( spes ) , given by the imaginary part @xmath38 $ ] . the polarization function in rpa yields the expression @xmath39 with @xmath40 , @xmath41 a positive infinitesimal , @xmath42 for spin degeneracy , @xmath43 and @xmath44 the fermi - dirac function with @xmath45 and @xmath46 the boltzmann constant . in the following we will assume zero temperature , @xmath47 . the overlap factor is given by @xmath48.\label{eq : f factor}\ ] ] eq . ( @xmath49 ) implies that @xmath50 is only a function of the reduced dimensionless variables @xmath51 and @xmath52 and parametrically depends on @xmath53 , @xmath54 and @xmath30 . in the massless dirac limit ( @xmath55 ) , eigenspinors are characterized by their helicity and consequently the overlap factor @xmath56 only depends on the angle @xmath57 between @xmath58 and @xmath59 . it is strictly one ( zero ) for states with the same ( opposite ) helicity . in the bhz model , the quadratic terms have the effect of turning the pseudospin of the eigenstates out of plane in opposite directions for conduction and valence bands at large @xmath51 , see fig . [ fig : overlap ] . , and a ti phase ( b ) , @xmath60 . the bands are separated by an additional @xmath61 for better illustration of the pseudospin . [ fig : overlap],title="fig:",width=158 ] , and a ti phase ( b ) , @xmath60 . the bands are separated by an additional @xmath61 for better illustration of the pseudospin . [ fig : overlap],title="fig:",width=158 ] this results in a decay of the overlap factor down to @xmath62 in the limit of a conventional 2deg system ( @xmath63 or @xmath64 ) . a finite mass @xmath65 has a similar effect , but in the limit of @xmath66 . the pseudospin turns in the same ( opposite ) direction as for the quadratic term for positive ( negative ) mass , see fig . [ fig : overlap ] . this has the direct consequence that for a normal insulator ( ni ) phase the interband overlap factor is reduced , while it is increased for a ti phase . on the contrary , a positive ( negative ) mass enhances ( diminishes ) the intraband overlap factor . this picture is also confirmed in section [ f - sum rule introduction ] by calculating the f - sum rule . the bare coulomb interaction @xmath67 in an electron gas is modified by screening into the effective interaction @xmath68 . there , screening is described by the dynamical dielectric function . employing dimensionless units , it acquires the form @xmath69 where we have introduced the interaction strength parameter @xmath70 ( effective dirac fine structure constant @xcite ) and the dimensionless function @xmath71 @xmath72 in graphene one finds @xcite @xmath73 , while in hg(cd)te qws it is of the order @xmath74 @xcite . here , @xmath75 is the background dielectric constant , accounting for screening of internal electronic shells , while @xmath76 gives the dynamic screening due to electrons in the low energy bands . zeros of @xmath77 describe a density - density ( longitudinal ) perturbation of the system that it is able to sustain itself , which forms a collective mode called plasmon . it is defined by @xmath78 with the plasma frequency @xmath79 , and the finite imaginary part @xmath80 accounts for the possible damping due to single - particle excitations @xcite . the dissipation of the interacting system , including both single - particle excitation and the plasmon mode , is then described by the imaginary part of the interacting polarization function @xmath81 . in order to compare to the non - interacting one , we will plot the normalized functions @xmath82 , \ \pi^{im}\equiv \im\left[\pi^{r}\right ] , \ \pi^{re}\equiv \re\left[\pi^{r}\right ] \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the following , with @xmath83 . in rpa , eq . ( [ eq : epsi ] ) characterizes the screening of the interaction between two electrons exchanging momentum @xmath51 and energy @xmath52 , by the creation of electron - hole pairs in the electron gas with the same momentum @xmath51 . if these pairs are resonant in energy @xmath84 , they correspond to a physical process leading to dissipation and a lowering of the coulomb interaction - described by the imaginary part of the polarization function , eq . ( [ eq : pi_par ] ) . when @xmath85 , we have only virtual electron - hole pairs , which either still screen the interaction , if @xmath86 , or even enhance it ( antiscreening effect ) , if @xmath87 . these effects depend on the energy of the created pair , for @xmath88 one finds antiscreening , while @xmath89 leads to a screening of the bare coulomb interaction . this can be directly seen from the definition of the polarization function , eq . ( [ eq : pi_par ] ) . for every allowed excitation , the real part of the integrand in eq . ( [ eq : pi_par ] ) becomes @xmath90}{\omega^2-\omega_{eh } \left[\boldsymbol{\tilde{x}},\boldsymbol{\tilde{x}'}\right]^{2 } } , \label{eq : integrand}\ ] ] with @xmath91 ( @xmath92 ) for intraband ( interband ) excitations . therefore every process with energy less than @xmath52 increases @xmath93 , lowering @xmath94 and thus increasing the interaction . in the intrinsic dirac system within rpa one finds @xmath95 for all energies @xmath52 where electron - hole excitations are allowed @xcite . thus the screening effect of virtual excitations with @xmath89 cancels exactly with the one from excitations with @xmath88 , such that the only screening comes from the resonant process @xmath84 . in the bhz model , the high energy excitations become less likely as the electron and the hole band get decoupled for large @xmath52 . additionally their excitation energy is higher as in the dirac case for the same momentum @xmath51 , leading to an additional reduction of their influence on @xmath93 due to the lorentzian in eq . ( [ eq : integrand ] ) . further , low energy excitations become more important , as processes are allowed that where forbidden in the dirac system by helicity ( see sec . [ sec : bhz model no mass no d ] for details ) . combining these effects , one finds the virtual excitations which increase the coulomb interaction , @xmath88 , dominating for larger frequency @xmath52 , leading to an increased effective interaction and the possibility of intrinsic plasmons in the bhz model @xcite . more mathematically speaking , the described effects alter the high energy behaviour of @xmath96 from a decay like @xmath97 in the dirac case to a @xmath98 decay in the bhz model , as is shown in sec . [ sec : expansion of pi ] . taking the kramers - kronig relation @xmath99 one finds directly that the real part of the polarization changes sign for @xmath100 , but not for @xmath101 . in more general terms , one can expect intrinsic interband plasmons to appear in all models for which @xmath96 decays faster as @xmath97 for high energies . the static limit of the polarization function is obtained by sending @xmath102 at finite momentum @xmath51 in eq . ( [ eq : pi_par ] ) . in this limit we can easily analyze the response of the system to the application of a static ( or sufficiently slowly varying ) external potential . an important physical problem of this kind is the screening of a charged impurity by the electronic system . the static polarization is a strictly real function , that we define as @xmath103 in a multiband system , like the bhz model , it is useful to separate the contributions to the static polarization coming from the intrinsic neutral system , @xmath104 ( obtained for @xmath105 ) , and the contribution due to a finite charge density , @xmath106 ( finite @xmath26 ) . consistently with the notation of eq . ( [ eq : pi_static ] ) , the dielectric function , eq . ( [ eq : epsi ] ) , can therefore be rearranged into @xmath107.\end{aligned}\ ] ] from the static dielectric constant we can find the induced charge density in response to a test charge @xmath108 placed at the origin . the variation of the electronic charge density in momentum space corresponds to @xmath109 , where @xmath110 is given by @xcite @xmath111}-1= \\ & = & n_r(x ) + n_0(x ) + n_\mu(x ) . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] here the induced charge density can be seen as a sum of three contributions of different physical nature . the first is due to the background polarization @xmath112 ( high energy polarization of the system ) , the second to the intrinsic polarization @xmath113 ( polarization of the natural system ) and the third to the polarization of the finite charge density in the system @xmath114 , with @xmath115 in real space , the density fluctuation ( using physical dimensional units ) is given by @xmath116 with @xmath117 the zero - th order bessel function . including coulomb interaction , we now have a 4-dimensional parameter space consisting of @xmath53 , @xmath54 , @xmath30 and @xmath70 . this parameter space will be explored systematically in the following . while the exploration of the different physical behaviors featured by the bhz model in different regions of this parameter space has a clear theoretical significance , we want to stress that our discussion is also relevant for experiments . in particular , realistic parameters for hg(cd)te qw structures @xcite are roughly @xmath118 , @xmath119 , @xmath120 and masses @xmath13 with absolute values up to several mev . the interaction strength is around @xmath121 with an average @xmath122 from the cdte substrate ( @xmath123 ) and hgte ( @xmath124 ) . considering the experimental acceptable damping rate for plasmons , we refer to experiments on the surface states of a 3d ti @xcite . there , plasmons with a ratio of @xmath125 are perfectly resolvable . the f - sum rule for the polarization function provides the total spectral weight of all excitations in the system . it is identical for the interacting and noninteracting system , as the interaction conserves the number of particles . thus the sum rule is a powerful tool to check our numerics . additionally , it offers a deeper insight concerning the shift of spectral weight between the inter and intra spes as well as the different plasmons in the system . the f - sum rule is defined by @xcite @xmath126=g_s\left\langle 0\left| \left[\left[n_{\mathbf{q}},h^0\right],n_{\mathbf{q}}^{\dagger}\right]\right|0\right\rangle\ \label{eq : f - sum def}\ ] ] with the density operator @xmath127 and the hamiltonian @xmath128 with @xmath10 as defined in eq . ( [ eq : hamiltonian ] ) . @xmath129 is a spinor associated with the band - pseudospin degree of freedom ( band @xmath4 and @xmath5 in hg(cd)te qws ) . the spin degree of freedom enters via the degeneracy factor @xmath130 . for the calculation we follow the steps outlined in the appendix of ref . , where the f - sum rule for the dirac model is obtained . for the bhz model the computational steps are the same , therefore we only present important intermediate results and differences to the dirac limit . the commutator in eq . ( [ eq : f - sum def ] ) is given by @xmath131,n_{\mathbf{q}}^{\dagger}\right]&= & \sum_\mathbf{k}\left(\psi^\dag_{\mathbf{k}}h^0_{\mathbf{k},\mathbf{q}}\psi_{\mathbf{k}}-\psi^\dag_{\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{q}}h^0_{\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{q},\mathbf{q}}\psi_{\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{q}}\right)\nonumber\\ & -&2q^2\sum_\mathbf{k}\psi^\dag_{\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{q}}\left(d\sigma_0+b\sigma_z\right)\psi_{\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{q}}\label{eq : f - sum commutator}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath132 . a simple shift of the momentum sums in eq . ( [ eq : f - sum commutator ] ) would put the first line to zero , but this is not allowed . in the same way as in the dirac system , the operators are unbounded and one has to work with a large momentum cutoff @xmath133 . while in the dirac limit one finds simply @xmath134 and the second line of eq . ( [ eq : f - sum commutator ] ) would be zero , now the latter gives rise to a contribution depending on the chemical potential , as one would expect for a 2deg . the sums in eq . ( [ eq : f - sum commutator ] ) are then converted into integrals and solved in the limit of large @xmath133 . care has to been taken when converting the momentum cutoff @xmath133 into the frequency cutoff @xmath135 , such that both integrals cover the same phase space . for a pure dirac system one find the f - sum rule @xcite @xmath136=-\frac{g_s q^{2}\lambda}{16 } \label{eq : dirac f - sum rule}\ ] ] where the cutoff @xmath135 is needed as the dirac spectrum is unbounded . in a 2deg system one finds @xmath137=\frac{g_s}{4 } \left(b\pm d\right ) k_{f}^{2}q^{2}=-\frac{\pi nq^{2}}{2 m } \label{eq:2deg f - sum rule}\ ] ] with @xmath138 the electron density and @xmath139\neq0 $ ] only over a finite range of @xmath140 . similar to a dirac system , the bhz spectrum is unbounded which complicates the evaluation of the sum rule and makes it necessary to introduce a high - energy cutoff @xmath141 . we find approximately for @xmath142 @xmath143 \label{eq : bhz f - sum rule}\\ = & \frac{g_{s}}{8}x^{2}\biggl[\ln\left(\frac{2\lambda e^{-1 - 2\xi_{m}+2\left|\omega_{f}\right|}}{1 + 2x_{f}^{2}\left(1+\gamma\xi_{d}\right)+2\xi_{m}+2\left|\omega_{f}\right|}\right ) \nonumber \\ + & \frac{1-x^{2}+4\xi_{m}}{\lambda}-\frac{2x^{4}+\left(1 + 4\xi_{m}\right)^{2}-4x^{2}\left(2 + 7\xi_{m}\right)}{4\lambda^{2}}\biggl ] \nonumber \\ + & \mathcal{o}\left(\frac{\xi_{d}}{\lambda^{2}}\right)+\mathcal{o}\left(\frac{1}{\lambda^{3}}\right ) \nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath144 $ ] and euler s number @xmath145 , so the leading order term diverges logarithmically with @xmath146 . this is due to the fact that @xmath147 $ ] decays like @xmath98 for @xmath148 , and not as @xmath97 as for a dirac system . the sum rule is exact up to order @xmath149 ( @xmath150 ) for finite ( zero ) @xmath151 . the f - sum rules for bhz , dirac and 2deg models are always proportional to @xmath152 in the leading order , but otherwise distinct from one another . taking the limit @xmath63 in the bhz result , eq . ( [ eq : bhz f - sum rule ] ) , gives the 2deg case , eq . ( [ eq:2deg f - sum rule ] ) ) , the same is not possible for the limit @xmath153 , as there the defined cutoff @xmath154 would go to zero . ] . we begin our discussion of eq . ( [ eq : bhz f - sum rule ] ) by comparing the contributions from the different orders @xmath155 , @xmath156 and @xmath157 . in the limit of @xmath158 we find @xmath159 and @xmath160 , thus the ratio @xmath161 determines the importance of higher order corrections for @xmath162 . we take @xmath163 for the cutoff in the following . already for @xmath164 and a maximal momentum @xmath165 , the corrections of order @xmath156 are 2% of order @xmath155 , while contributions of order @xmath157 are smaller than 0.1% . a modest cutoff @xmath166 works best for comparing eq . ( [ eq : bhz f - sum rule ] ) to numerical data , as the latter one is only given over a finite range of @xmath52 . a larger @xmath146 makes it necessary to extrapolate the data , providing a source for errors . next , we investigate changes to the f - sum rule and therefore to the total spectral weight by varying the mass . the influence of a finite mass is studied in fig . [ fig : f - sum rule ] of the lowest order f - sum rule including mass over the one without mass . @xmath169 and @xmath32 . ( b ) ratio @xmath170 of the lowest order f - sum rule including finite doping over the one without doping , @xmath171 ( @xmath172 ) as a black , solid ( red , dashed ) line . @xmath173 and @xmath174 . @xmath164 and @xmath175 in both plots . [ fig : f - sum rule],title="fig:",width=158 ] of the lowest order f - sum rule including mass over the one without mass . @xmath169 and @xmath32 . ( b ) ratio @xmath170 of the lowest order f - sum rule including finite doping over the one without doping , @xmath171 ( @xmath172 ) as a black , solid ( red , dashed ) line . @xmath173 and @xmath174 . @xmath164 and @xmath175 in both plots . [ fig : f - sum rule],title="fig:",width=158 ] \(a ) for @xmath169 and @xmath32 . a positive mass lowers the f - sum rule , while a negative mass increases it linearly . this is a direct consequence from the change of the overlap factor : a negative mass enhances the coupling between the two bands , while a positive mass diminishes it , as in the latter case the pseudospins do not match . it is also consistent with the increase in the optical conductivity observed in the undoped limit with negative mass @xcite . last , we consider the effects of finite doping . it blocks interband transitions close to the dirac point , but due to the small density of states , these transitions carry only a small spectral weight . on the other hand , doping enables intraband transitions , which carry a large spectral weight due the combined effects of larger overlap factor , density of states and smaller excitation energies compared to interband transitions . therefore , a finite doping usually increases the f - sum rule , as seen in fig . [ fig : f - sum rule ] ( b ) , where we plot @xmath170 for positive ( black , solid line ) and negative ( red , dashed line ) doping with @xmath174 and @xmath176 . a finite @xmath54 adds a term @xmath177 to the leading order of the f - sum rule , @xmath178 ( @xmath179 ) for positive ( negative ) doping . it can be seen as an increased ( decreased ) contribution from the 2deg part of the spectrum , eq . ( [ eq:2deg f - sum rule ] ) , and leads to the slight decrease of the f - sum rule for negative doping in panel ( b ) . in order to compare the importance of different excitations in the system , one should compare their spectral weight and thus their contribution to the f - sum rule . the latter has the benefit of being independent of the coulomb interaction strength and the position of the excitation peaks , in contrast to the polarization function @xmath180 . as an example , we assume that the excitation spectrum , @xmath180 , is governed by a single plasmonic peak following a lorentzian shape with width @xmath1 and peak height @xmath181 . then the f - sum rule is proportional to @xmath182 . the value of this integral should be independent of @xmath70 and thus of @xmath183 . therefore we find @xmath184 , such that the peak height of a resonance in @xmath180 naturally has to scale with @xmath185 to fulfill the f - sum rule . we conclude that the importance of a resonance in @xmath180 should be judged by its spectral weight , which can be estimated by multiplying the peak height with its position @xmath183 . the relevant width of the peak is given by @xmath186 , with @xmath1 being the width of the resonance in @xmath180 . in this section , we focus on an intrinsic ( undoped limit @xmath105 ) bhz model system . first , we analyze the static polarization function and the static screening properties . then we consider the long wavelength limit of the dynamical polarization function , providing an analytical expansion . finally , we add some complementary arguments elucidating the origin of the new interband plasmon ( absent both in the dirac and 2deg cases ) , whose appearence for the intrinsic bhz model has been proposed in ref . . in order to set a reference with a closely related and analytically solvable model , we discuss the static intrinsic polarization for a massive dirac limit , given by @xcite @xmath187 \overset{m\rightarrow0}{\longrightarrow } \frac{-g q}{16 a } , \label{eq : pi_dirac_static}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the index @xmath62 stands for intrinsic limit @xmath105 , @xmath188 account for possible spin and band degeneracy , and @xmath189 . when the dirac system is massless ( @xmath190 ) , @xmath191 is a linear function of the momentum @xmath192 . a finite dirac mass suppresses the polarization for @xmath193 , where @xmath191 shows a super - linear behavior . for @xmath194 , the mass is negligible instead and the result of the massless limit is reproduced . the static polarization function of the bhz model is simply obtained by direct numerical evaluation of eq . ( [ eq : pi_par ] ) at zero frequency . in fig . [ fig : pi_0_static ] , we show @xmath104 calculated for a particle - hole symmetric bhz system ( @xmath195 ) . note that we obtain the massless dirac case in the limit @xmath196 ( and therefore @xmath197 ) , where @xmath198 . a finite @xmath16 parameter determines a fundamental qualitative change with respect to a dirac system . indeed , @xmath104 reaches a maximum at @xmath199 and then decays as @xmath200 for @xmath201 as shown in the inset of fig . [ fig : pi_0_static ] . and @xmath195.,width=302 ] a finite and positive dirac mass @xmath13 leads to a general suppression of the polarization function with respect to the massless case . in the region @xmath202 ( where quadratic terms are less important ) , @xmath104 resembles the massive dirac case , with a super - linear increase in the region @xmath203 , due to the suppression of the interband overlap factor determining a reduction of the polarization at small momentum . for intermediate values @xmath204 , analogously to the massive dirac limit , @xmath104 is approximatively linear in @xmath51 . considering larger momenta @xmath205 , the behavior is dominated by the quadratic terms and the polarization eventually vanish for @xmath206 . in general , the interplay of quadratic terms and a finite dirac mass shifts the maximum of @xmath104 . when the dirac mass @xmath13 is negative ( topological insulator phase ) , we observe a less pronounced suppression of the polarization for @xmath207 , with respect to a massive dirac system ( normal insulator ) with equal modulus of @xmath13 . moreover , on the contrary to the @xmath208 case , @xmath104 is enhanced at large @xmath51 with respect to the massless , particle - hole symmetric limit . this behavior is due to the enhanced overlap factor between electron and hole bands in the topological insulator phase . in fig . [ fig : d](a - c ) , value.,width=302 ] we analyze the effects of a finite value of the parameter @xmath151 in the bhz model , for @xmath209 , @xmath62 and @xmath210 . a finite @xmath151 breaks particle - hole symmetry by changing the effective masses of conduction and valence bands . we only found quantitative changes to @xmath104 , which is progressively reduced for increasing @xmath151 . in a massless dirac system , where the static polarization is linear in @xmath192 [ eq . ( [ eq : pi_dirac_static ] ) ] , the dielectric function is a constant @xmath211 therefore the intrinsic polarization contribution can be absorbed into an effective background dielectric constant @xmath212 . as a consequence , a test charge @xmath213 , placed at the origin , induces a screening electronic density @xmath214= z e \left ( \frac{1-\varepsilon}{\varepsilon}\right),\ ] ] which in real space corresponds to a screening image charge [ a fraction @xmath215 of the external one ] placed exactly at the same position @xmath216 note that the screening charge only due to the electronic system ( without background contribution ) is a fraction @xmath217 of the external one . in a massive dirac system , the large @xmath192 behavior of @xmath191 reproduces the massless limit and therefore a screening charge given by eq . ( [ eq : charge_dirac ] ) is also developed at vanishing distances @xmath218 in response to an external test charge . however , in the long wave length limit ( @xmath219 ) @xmath191 has a superlinear behavior and thus @xmath220 . thus an induced charge density of the same sign as the external charge is developed at finite distances @xcite [ summing up to @xmath221 , so that the test charge feels only the background screening over long distances , as expected in an insulator . for the bhz model , we find similar to eq . ( [ constant screening dirac ] ) @xmath222 in the long wavelength limit , but @xmath223 . in order to understand this , we discuss next the induced charge density in real space for the bhz model . it is given by @xmath224 with @xmath225 a natural charge density constant of the model . we note that @xmath226 is proportional to @xmath227 and @xmath70 , but @xmath226 has an additional dependence on @xmath70 ( and thus on @xmath11 ) through its integrand . it also parametrically depends on @xmath167 and @xmath151 through @xmath104 and @xmath228 . in fig . [ fig : n_int ] , due to a test charge in the intrinsic limit of the bhz model for @xmath229 . the plot is invariant under a change of @xmath16 parameter and only depend on the effective fine structure constant @xmath70 . in the inset , @xmath230 calculated for @xmath231 and finite dirac mass.,width=302 ] we plot the induced charge density @xmath226 in real space for @xmath229 with different values of @xmath70 . opposite to a dirac system , the induced charge density has a finite extent over a distance of the order of @xmath232 , which is clearly related to the decay of @xmath233 at large wavevector due to the presence of quadratic @xmath16 terms . @xmath226 decays at large distances as @xmath234 . an electron far away from this induced charge , @xmath235 , does not see the finite extent of it and is therefore screened in the same way as in the dirac system , leading to the similarity of eqs . ( [ constant screening dirac ] ) and ( [ constant screening bhz ] ) . in the opposite limit where the electron sits on top of the induced charge , @xmath236 , it does not feel it at all , resulting in no screening besides @xmath237 . in the inset of fig . [ fig : n_int ] , we study the effect of a finite dirac mass term . with a finite @xmath167 , the induced density ( as in the case of pure dirac systems ) shows a qualitatively different behavior . @xmath226 changes sign for sufficiently large @xmath218 , ensuring a vanishing total induced charge . from a quantitative point of view , a finite negative ( positive ) @xmath13 enhances ( suppresses ) the features of @xmath226 , due to its effect on the interband overlap factor . an analytic discussion of the polarization function is only possible in the limit @xmath197 . here , we focus on the limit of vanishing mass @xmath238 to extract an analytic formula of the plasmon dispersion . an expansion of @xmath239 in @xmath51 gives , for @xmath240 @xmath241 where one finds an @xmath98 behaviour with an additional logarithmic correction for the real part in the high frequency limit . calculating the plasmon dispersion by performing an expansion of eq . ( [ eq : plasmon equation ] ) up to second order in @xmath242 , one finds the linear dispersion @xmath243 which is only valid for sufficiently large @xmath70 , such that the conditions @xmath244>0 $ ] and @xmath240 are fulfilled . the linearity of the dispersion follows from eq . ( [ eq : pi undoped expanded ] ) only by inclusion of the damping via @xmath1 . without the substitution @xmath245 , @xmath246=0 $ ] has no sensible solution for @xmath183 . the damping ratio is given by @xmath247 underlining the importance of damping in this limit . the plasmon is only well defined for a finite @xmath248 , with @xmath249 where @xmath250 sets the limit for the detectability of the plasmons , for example in the recent experiment @xcite @xmath251 was shown to be of the order @xmath252 . ( [ eq : plasmonfrequency linear ] ) translates this into a finite momentum scale @xmath253 with the intrinsic plasmon length scale @xmath254 , given by the coulomb interaction strength times the charge decay length @xmath255 , see sec . [ sec : screening_int ] . we interpret @xmath256 as the length scale up to which charge separation due to coulomb interaction can occur and give rise to the interband plasmons , in an undoped and therefore overall neutral system . in the opposite limit of high frequencies , the term @xmath257 spoils a simple @xmath258 behaviour of the plasmon dispersion . in this limit , we can extract the analytic form of the damping rate @xmath259 with euler s number @xmath145 , yet the plasmon dispersion can only be calculated numerically . in the following discussion of the different excitation spectra , we will use these analytic results to check our numerics in the limits of small momenta and low and high frequencies . the non - interacting single - particle excitation spectrum is given by @xmath96 , which we plot in fig . [ fig : intrinsic spectra ] ( a ) ( a ) and @xmath180 for @xmath260 ( b ) and @xmath261 ( c ) . ( d ) shows linecuts for fixed @xmath262 with @xmath263 in black solid , red dot - dashed , blue long dashed and green short dashed lines , respectively . @xmath173 and @xmath174 . [ fig : intrinsic spectra],title="fig:",width=158 ] ( a ) and @xmath180 for @xmath260 ( b ) and @xmath261 ( c ) . ( d ) shows linecuts for fixed @xmath262 with @xmath263 in black solid , red dot - dashed , blue long dashed and green short dashed lines , respectively . @xmath173 and @xmath174 . [ fig : intrinsic spectra],title="fig:",width=158 ] ( a ) and @xmath180 for @xmath260 ( b ) and @xmath261 ( c ) . ( d ) shows linecuts for fixed @xmath262 with @xmath263 in black solid , red dot - dashed , blue long dashed and green short dashed lines , respectively . @xmath173 and @xmath174 . [ fig : intrinsic spectra],title="fig:",width=158 ] ( a ) and @xmath180 for @xmath260 ( b ) and @xmath261 ( c ) . ( d ) shows linecuts for fixed @xmath262 with @xmath263 in black solid , red dot - dashed , blue long dashed and green short dashed lines , respectively . @xmath173 and @xmath174 . [ fig : intrinsic spectra],title="fig:",width=158 ] for @xmath173 and @xmath174 . due to energy conservation , there are no excitations beneath a frequency @xmath264 . in contrast to graphene , where one observes a diverging behaviour of the polarization at @xmath264 , here @xmath96 increases continously from @xmath62 . this is due to the broken particle - hole symmetry ( @xmath265 ) which ensures that the lowest energy excitations correspond to processes exciting particles from the valence band to the proximity of the dirac point , where , however , the density of states is zero . the excitation spectrum shows a maximum for small momenta @xmath202 which lies beneath the plasmon dispersion given by the black line , perturbatively calculated from eq . ( [ eq : plasmon equation ] ) up to order @xmath266 for @xmath260 . considering a finite coulomb interaction , the excitation spectrum is given by @xmath180 plotted in fig . [ fig : intrinsic spectra ] ( b ) for @xmath260 and ( c ) for @xmath261 . the maximum of the spectrum shifts to higher energies compared to the non - interacting one , indicating the formation of a collective excitation in the system , i.e. a plasmon . this is proven by solving the plasmon equation ( eq . ( [ eq : plasmon equation ] ) ) perturbatively up to order @xmath267 , with the dispersion plotted as a black line on top of the spectrum . additionally , the dispersion based on the expansion of @xmath239 in the limit @xmath197 for @xmath268 and @xmath148 are plotted as gray lines in fig . [ fig : intrinsic spectra](c ) . the plasmon dispersion relation starts linearly for small @xmath192 , as one would expect for a neutral system without doping . at high energies on the other hand , a free - particle behaviour could be expected , leading to the usual @xmath269 dispersion known from doped systems . although eq . ( [ eq : pi undoped expanded ] ) shows that this picture is only partly true due to the logarithmic correction of @xmath93 , fig . [ fig : intrinsic spectra ] ( c ) indicates a qualitative agreement . [ fig : intrinsic spectra ] ( d ) shows linecuts of @xmath180 for fixed @xmath262 with @xmath263 . additionally , the black vertical lines indicate the plasmon frequency for @xmath270 ( left line ) and @xmath261 ( right line ) . for @xmath271 the maximum of the interacting spectrum lies between the maximum of the non - interacting spectrum and the plasmon frequency , indicating that single - particle and collective excitations are equally strong . increasing the interaction to @xmath260 , the maximum of the interacting spectrum and the plasmon frequency almost coincide , therefore the plasmon dominates over the single - particle excitation . at very large interactions @xmath261 , the plasmon is the only relevant excitation in the system . increasing the coulomb interaction broadens the plasmon peak and reduces its height as shown in fig . [ fig : intrinsic spectra ] ( d ) . this seems contrary to the picture of a plasmon as a sharp interaction - induced charge resonance , suggesting that these interband plasmons may not be well - defined for high energies . yet this is a false conclusion . in sec . [ f - sum rule interpretation exc spectrum ] we discussed that the contribution of the resonance to the f - sum rule is the actual measure of importance of a resonance . it can be estimated by multiplying the peak height in @xmath180 by @xmath183 , while the relevant peak width is given by @xmath186 . the latter is decreasing with @xmath183 according to eq . ( [ eq : damping expansion ] ) . from this normalization of the peak we conclude that the discussed interband plasmons fulfill the interpretation as sharp interaction - induced charge resonances , with the width @xmath186 decreasing with increasing plasmon frequency , above the critical frequency @xmath272 as defined in sec . [ sec : expansion of pi ] . the f - sum rule provides a check for our numerics . in fig . [ fig : f - sum numerical undoped ] , with @xmath273 being the difference between the numercial and analytical f - sum rule . black dots are for the non - interacting spectrum , while blue stars stand for @xmath260 and green triangles for @xmath261 . @xmath274 , @xmath175 , @xmath173 and @xmath174 . the deviations around @xmath275 stem from numerical instabilities , which are however negligibly small . [ fig : f - sum numerical undoped],width=226 ] we plot the ratio @xmath276 , with @xmath277 where @xmath278 is the numerical calculated f - sum rule and @xmath279 the analytic one . the deviation are of the order @xmath280 , comparable to the analytical uncertainty , see sec . [ f - sum rule introduction ] , and thus negligible . the f - sum has to be the same for interacting and not interacting systems . we find a slight dependence on the interaction strength @xmath70 , which could be a numerical artifact , depending on @xmath146 , or a real @xmath70 dependence like in graphene , where spectral weight is missing for small frequencies , cf . ( 14 ) in ref . ( @xmath281 for the undoped dirac model ) . as the effect declines with increasing cutoff @xmath146 , we conclude that the rpa approximation in the bhz model misses no spectral weight compared to the full coulomb interaction , even in the undoped limit . in this section , we extend our analysis to finite doping @xmath282 , where a net charge density is present in the system . doping the system has two effects : one is the fermi blocking of interband excitations ( red arrow in fig . [ fig : ab bandstructure ] ( a ) ) for small @xmath51 and @xmath52 . the other is the appearance of intraband excitations ( green arrow in fig . [ fig : ab bandstructure ] ( a ) ) , which are absent in the intrinsic limit . again , first we study the polarization and screening properties of the system in the static limit , where we also study friedel oscillations due to the scattering on a charged impurity . then , we study the dynamical polarization function in the long - wavelength limit , where we obtain an analytical expression for the collective plasmonic modes of the system . finally we numerically compute the dynamical polarization function in the full range of momenta and frequencies in the full parameter space of the bhz model , analyzing the effect of each of the model parameters . particular emphasis is put on the coexistence of interband and intraband plasmons and on how the bhz model interpolates between the dirac and 2deg behavior . in fig . [ fig : normalized ] , of the bhz model for @xmath283 at finite doping for different value of @xmath284 , normalized by the dos @xmath285 . in the inset , details on the value of @xmath286 as a function of @xmath284 are given . , width=302 ] we present the static polarization function @xmath287 at finite doping , conveniently normalized by the density of states at the fermi level @xmath285 . this normalization stands out naturally from the long wavelength property of the polarization function @xmath288 for the bhz model at finite doping , @xmath289 has a pronounced dependence on the extrinsic parameter @xmath290 . for @xmath291 ( @xmath292 ) the fermi level falls in a region where locally the dispersion curve has predominant dirac ( 2deg ) character . in a 2deg system , the static polarization assumes the following analytic form @xcite @xmath293 while in the dirac limit we have @xcite @xmath294.\end{aligned}\ ] ] our calculations for the bhz model with @xmath283 correctly reproduce the dirac and 2deg limits for @xmath291 and @xmath292 , respectively . we note that with a finite @xmath16 term and nonzero @xmath284 the polarization will always have a decay behavior for @xmath295 . in the 2deg and dirac limit one finds @xmath296 for @xmath297 , coincidence due to the balancing effect of dispersion curve and overlap factor . interestingly , in the bhz model we observe instead a deviation from unity , shown in details in the inset of fig . [ fig : normalized ] , which has a maximum for @xmath298 . in the 2deg limit , @xmath299 , @xmath300 has a strong discontinuity in its first derivative at @xmath301 , while for decreasing @xmath284 this discontinuity decreases and finally vanishes in the dirac limit , where the discontinuity affects only the second derivative . we already analyzed in section [ sec : screening_int ] the intrinsic response of a bhz system to a test charge , when no net charge density is present in the system . while the intrinsic response is realized on intrinsic scales of the model @xmath232 , the metallic response ( at finite electronic density ) is characterized by the fermi wave length @xmath302 . therefore it is convenient to express @xmath114 as a function of dimensionless units @xmath303 , due to the presence of a discontinuity at @xmath304 . the induced charge density @xmath305 is given by @xmath306 where , using the property eq . ( [ eq : lwl_pi ] ) , we have emphasized the dependence of the induced density on the dos at the fermi level , which now appears in the scaling factor @xmath307 . we note that the integral also depends on the parameters @xmath70 and @xmath284 ( and naturally on @xmath167 and @xmath151 , when finite ) . and @xmath308 , @xmath252 and @xmath309 . data in different panels belong to systems with @xmath310 , @xmath252 , @xmath309 , @xmath311 , @xmath312 and @xmath313 . all calculation are obtained by keeping @xmath314 and @xmath315 nm@xmath316 , and varying @xmath317 , @xmath318 and @xmath319 ev nm , for @xmath308 , @xmath252 and @xmath309 , respectively , while varying the parameter @xmath16 accordingly to @xmath284 . in the panel @xmath320 ( 2deg limit ) , the three curves with @xmath308 , @xmath252 and @xmath309 are quite close and correspond to similar @xmath321 parameter ( @xmath322 , @xmath323 and @xmath324 , respectively ) . , width=321 ] in fig . [ fig : n_dop ] , we present the induced screening electronic radial density for the bhz model for @xmath283 due to a point - like test charge . each panel corresponds to a different value of the ratio @xmath290 , and within each panel curves differing by the dirac fine structure constant @xmath70 are presented . friedel oscillations appear of period @xmath302 , which become more defined for larger @xmath70 . we also note that density oscillations are more prominent for @xmath325 than in the dirac ( @xmath326 ) and 2deg limits ( @xmath327 ) . in the 2deg limit the @xmath70 parameter is ill defined and should be replaced by the more general parameter @xmath328 , characterizing the dielectric response of the system . the presence of friedel oscillations and their asymptotic behavior are related through the lighthill theorem @xcite to discontinuities in the static polarization function and its derivatives ( see for example ref . for a detailed discussion ) . a discontinuity like @xmath329 in @xmath330 , with @xmath331 the heaviside step function and @xmath332 , translates into a decay of the oscillations in @xmath333 with leading order @xmath334 . one finds @xmath335 ( @xmath336 ) for the leading order discontinuity of a 2deg ( dirac ) system , such that the first ( second ) and all higher derivatives of the static polarization function are discontinuous at @xmath337 . analyzing the friedel oscillations for the bhz model , one finds a composition of two different contributions with an asymptotic decay at large distances as @xmath234 ( 2deg contribution ) and @xmath338 ( dirac contribution ) , respectively . as a consequence , the discontinuity in the rpa polarization function of the bhz model at @xmath339 can be very well approximated by a combination of 2deg ( @xmath335 ) and dirac ( @xmath336 ) contribution . in the dirac ( 2deg ) limit , the effect of the discontinuity in the second ( first ) derivative becomes predominant and oscillations purely decay in leading order as @xmath338 ( @xmath234 ) . at finite doping , for small momenta @xmath51 , the polarization function is governed by intraband excitations , as the interband excitations are fermi - blocked . we perform an expansion in this limit , for @xmath240 , to gain an analytical insight into the physics at finite doping and derive an analytical formula for the plasmon dispersion . in particular , intraband plasmons are expected to be the dominant excitation for small momenta , similarly to the 2deg and dirac case . we expand the polarization function up to order @xmath340 @xmath341= \pi_{44}\frac{x^{4}}{\omega^{4}}+\pi_{42}\frac{x^{4}}{\omega^{2}}+\pi_{40}x^{4}\\ + \pi_{22}\frac{x^{2 } } { \omega^{2 } } + \pi_{20}x^{2}+\mathcal{o}\left(\omega^{2}\right)\end{aligned}\ ] ] and use it to solve eq . ( [ eq : plasmon equation ] ) . we obtain a plasmon dispersion of @xmath342 with the leading coefficient @xmath343 with @xmath144 $ ] and @xmath344 . in the limit of zero mass , @xmath345 interpolates smoothly between @xmath62 for @xmath346 and @xmath347 for @xmath348 . the former case corresponds to the dirac limit , where one finds the plasmon frequency @xmath349 in the literature @xcite , being identical to eqs . ( [ eq : plas_freq_bhz],[eq : pi doped expanded dirac limit ] ) . the latter case is the 2deg limit , where one finds the plasmon dispersion @xmath350 in the literature @xcite , with @xmath351 the carrier density and @xmath352 . this in in agreement with eqs . ( [ eq : plas_freq_bhz],[eq : pi doped expanded 2deg limit ] ) . thus the bhz model as a function of its parameters reproduces the plasmon dispersion in the dirac and 2deg limits and interpolates between them . we note that for @xmath353 the term @xmath354 is zero and the intraband plasmon disappears . in this limit , the leading order contribution @xmath355 of the intrinsic polarization , eq . [ eq : pi undoped expanded ] , takes the place of @xmath354 . the crucial difference between the extrinsic and the intrinsic polarization is that the latter has a finite imaginary part of order @xmath355 , leading to the linear dispersion of the interband plasmons . yet for finite @xmath356 , these interband plasmons are supressed due to the fermi blockade of the interband excitations and only exist if their plasmon frequency exceeds both the chemical potential @xmath357 and the critical frequency @xmath272 as defined in sec . [ sec : expansion of pi ] , see for example fig . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf01 ] . besides the different scaling with momenta in the limit @xmath358 , also the scaling with @xmath70 is different for the inter- and intraband plasmons , eqs . ( [ eq : plasmonfrequency linear ] ) and ( [ eq : plas_freq_bhz ] ) : linear vs. square root . this will have important consequences in the following when we will discuss how to separate the two different collective excitations . we begin the discussion of the doped spectrum by looking at the limiting results of 2deg and dirac system . from this , we then find that we can interpolate between them by changing the fermi momentum . interestingly , by considering the cases of broken particle - hole symmetry and large masses , we also find regimes which are distinct from the dirac and 2deg limit . as an example , these regimes support both inter- and intraband plasmons at parameters which are realistic for hgte qws . in all the following plots , the boundaries of the single - particle spectrum will be indicated by faint black lines , the isolines @xmath95 by red lines . the plasmon dispersions are plotted as black curves ( full result from perturbation theory ) and gray curves ( expanded result in limit @xmath197 ) . in the 2deg limit , only intraband excitations are possible . the polarization function has a well - known analytical form @xcite , therefore we can easily plot the non - interacting spectrum in fig . [ fig : pi 2deg ] ( a ) . with @xmath359 and @xmath360 the degeneracy factor . ( b ) @xmath180 for @xmath361 , with @xmath362 the coulomb interaction . we add an artificial damping in the region of @xmath363 to make the plasmons visible . [ fig : pi 2deg],title="fig:",width=158 ] with @xmath359 and @xmath360 the degeneracy factor . ( b ) @xmath180 for @xmath361 , with @xmath362 the coulomb interaction . we add an artificial damping in the region of @xmath363 to make the plasmons visible . [ fig : pi 2deg],title="fig:",width=158 ] @xmath96 is peaked for @xmath364 closely to the upper boundary of the spectrum . it decays to zero instead for large momenta and frequencies like @xmath365 , if one considers a fixed ratio @xmath366 within the spe region . the interacting spectrum is shown in fig . [ fig : pi 2deg ] ( b ) . an intraband plasmon appears with the usual @xmath269 dispersion for @xmath358 . it absorbes all of the spectral weight in this limit , thus @xmath180 is suppressed in the spe region . for intermediate momenta , the plasmon dispersion lies in the spe region and the plasmon decays and broadens . for larger momenta and frequencies , the interacting and non - interacting spectra agree qualitatively . the dirac spectrum comprises both inter- and intraband excitations . the polarization function still has a well - known analytical expression @xcite , of which we plot the non - interacting spectrum @xmath96 in fig . [ fig : pi graphene ] ( a ) . with @xmath367 and @xmath360 the degeneracy factor . in the gray area , the colorscale is exceeded due to the divergency of @xmath96 . ( b ) @xmath180 for @xmath368 , with @xmath362 the coulomb interaction . we add an artificial damping in the regions of @xmath363 to make the plasmons visible . [ fig : pi graphene],title="fig:",width=158 ] with @xmath367 and @xmath360 the degeneracy factor . in the gray area , the colorscale is exceeded due to the divergency of @xmath96 . ( b ) @xmath180 for @xmath368 , with @xmath362 the coulomb interaction . we add an artificial damping in the regions of @xmath363 to make the plasmons visible . [ fig : pi graphene],title="fig:",width=158 ] the intraband excitations occur for higher energies @xmath369 , while for intraband excitations less energy is needed , @xmath370 . both excitation spectra touch at @xmath371 , where they diverge . only the fermi - blockade suppresses the interband transitions in @xmath96 for @xmath372 and cures the divergency , see fig . [ fig : pi graphene ] ( a ) for @xmath369 . one finds a @xmath373 decay for high frequencies . the interacting spectrum @xmath180 is plotted in fig . [ fig : pi graphene ] ( b ) for @xmath374 . similar to the 2deg , all of the intraband spectral weight is absorbed by a plasmon in the limit @xmath358 and the divergence at @xmath371 is cured . interestingly , for sufficient large interaction strength @xmath70 the plasmon decays in the interband spectrum . for larger momenta and frequencies , we note that the intraband polarization does not recover the non - interacting value , as it does for the 2deg , but remains much smaller . therefore single - particle intraband excitations are blocked altogether for all momenta and frequencies in this limit . the missing spectral weight goes into a charge resonance at higher frequencies in the interband spectrum @xcite . yet , this resonance is not a solution of the plasmon equation and therefore not a plasmon @xcite . the bandstructure of the bhz model without mass and particle - hole symmetry breaking is shown in fig . [ fig : ab bandstructure ] ( a ) . . interband spectrum in red , intraband spectrum in blue and mixed area in purple . [ fig : ab bandstructure],title="fig:",width=158 ] . interband spectrum in red , intraband spectrum in blue and mixed area in purple . [ fig : ab bandstructure],title="fig:",width=158 ] . interband spectrum in red , intraband spectrum in blue and mixed area in purple . [ fig : ab bandstructure],title="fig:",width=158 ] . interband spectrum in red , intraband spectrum in blue and mixed area in purple . [ fig : ab bandstructure],title="fig:",width=158 ] the interband single - particle excitations lying lowest in energy are symmetric in momentum as shown by the red arrow in fig . [ fig : ab bandstructure ] ( a ) , going from @xmath376 to @xmath377 . due to particle - hole symmetry , this leads to nesting and thus one expects these excitations to dominate the interband spectrum . interband excitations as indicated by the dashed , black arrow on the other hand , going from momentum @xmath378 to @xmath379 with @xmath380 , are suppressed due to imperfect nesting of the different sized electron and hole cones , as well as by a small overlap factor . the latter can be cured by introducing a large negative mass , as will be shown in sec . [ sec_bhz_mass ] . then these excitations have a considerable influence onto the polarization for small energies , helping with the formation of interband plasmons , following the ideas presented in sec . [ ( anti-)screening and intrinsic plasmons ] . in the pure dirac system , these processes are forbidden by helicity . by varying the doping level we can modify the excitation spectrum of the system [ see figs . [ fig : ab bandstructure ] ( b)-(d ) ] to resemble that of a dirac system ( @xmath381 ) or of a 2deg ( @xmath382 ) , or to obtain an intermediate behavior ( @xmath383 ) . in the pictures we highlight the boundaries of the excitation spectra , with the red area corresponding to the interband spectrum and the blue area to the intraband spectrum . the overlap between the two is indicated by the purple area . the boundaries of the spectra vary from the linear graphene behavior to the @xmath384 dependence of the 2deg . in general , the mixing of linear and quadratic dispersion leads to an overlap of the inter- and intraband spectrum . this affects the visibility of the interband plasmons , which can be hidden due to strong single - particle damping . [ [ weak - doping - of - x_f0.1 ] ] weak doping of @xmath385 : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the extrinsic ( @xmath25 ) and intrinsic ( @xmath386 ) scales of the system are separated by one order of magnitude . as the fermi surface lies in the ( almost ) linear part of the spectrum , we expect that on the @xmath25 scale we resemble graphene . the physics on the @xmath386 scale on the other hand should be more or less untouched by the doping , and the system should behave as in the intrinsic limit . we plot @xmath239 in fig . [ fig : imp bhz xf01 ] . . the red line indicates @xmath95 . [ fig : imp bhz xf01],title="fig:",width=158 ] . the red line indicates @xmath95 . [ fig : imp bhz xf01],title="fig:",width=158 ] comparing panel ( a ) to fig . [ fig : pi graphene ] , one finds good agreement with the dirac case . the biggest deviation is found in the peak of @xmath96 at @xmath387 , which is not symmetric as for a dirac system due to the overlap of inter- and intraband spectrum [ fig . [ fig : ab bandstructure ] ( b ) ] . the finite quadratic part in the spectrum cures the divergency formerly occuring in the dirac limit . the real part of @xmath388 is strongly negative only at the upper boundary of the intraband spectrum . this indicates that for small interactions , only one plasmon will dominate the excitation spectrum on the fermi scale . as we are interested in the regime where both inter- and intraband plasmons are visible , we look at the interacting spectrum , given in fig . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf01 ] by plotting @xmath180 , for a strong interaction @xmath261 . for @xmath385 with @xmath261 on the @xmath389 scale ( a ) and the @xmath386 scale ( b ) . we add an artificial damping in the regions of @xmath363 to make the plasmons visible . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf01],title="fig:",width=158 ] for @xmath385 with @xmath261 on the @xmath389 scale ( a ) and the @xmath386 scale ( b ) . we add an artificial damping in the regions of @xmath363 to make the plasmons visible . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf01],title="fig:",width=158 ] on the fermi scale [ panel ( a ) ] , the intraband plasmon absorbs all spectral weight from the intraband spectrum . the dispersion agrees with the perturbative dispersion from the expansion in eq . ( [ eq : plas_freq_bhz ] ) in the limit @xmath197 , plotted as a gray curve . the green , dashed line shows the linear dispersion of the interband plasmon in the undoped limit , based on eq . ( [ eq : plasmonfrequency linear ] ) . on the fermi scale , it is not obvious that there is an interband plasmon , although the interacting polarization function develops a smeared resonance around the perturbative interband plasmon dispersion for high momenta . switching to the intrinsic scale , fig . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf01 ] ( b ) , one finds the interband plasmon , corresponding to the single peak in @xmath390 , unperturbed by doping for momenta much larger than @xmath389 . the dispersion is the same as for a plasmon in the undoped limit @xcite . the two black lines near the peak are just the boundaries of the intraband excitation spectrum , which does not play a role here . as in the limit of @xmath197 the interband plasmon dispersion scales linearly with @xmath70 , @xmath391 see eq . ( [ eq : plasmonfrequency linear ] ) , while the intraband plasmon frequency is proportional to @xmath392 , lowering the interaction strength will lead to an overlap of the two resonances below some critical @xmath70 . [ [ strong - doping - of - x_f3 ] ] strong doping of @xmath393 : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + strong doping of the system significantly increases the spectral weight , as shown in fig . [ fig : f - sum rule ] ( b ) , with the increase of intraband excitations , while most of the interband excitations are fermi - blocked , leading therefore to an effective decoupling of the two bands . we expect the overall spectrum to be governed by intraband excitations and to resemble the spectrum of a 2deg , as the fermi surface lies in the ( almost ) quadratic part of the spectrum . the corresponding @xmath239 is plotted in fig . [ fig : imp bhz xf3 ] . . the red line indicates @xmath95 . [ fig : imp bhz xf3],title="fig:",width=158 ] . the red line indicates @xmath95 . [ fig : imp bhz xf3],title="fig:",width=158 ] the single - particle spectrum in panel ( a ) is peaked at small momenta and at energies close to the upper bound of the intraband spectrum . the interband part of the spectrum leads only to minor deviations from the 2deg case [ compare with fig . [ fig : pi 2deg ] ( a ) ] . the real part of @xmath388 in panel ( b ) is strongly negative at the upper boundary of the intraband spectrum , indicating that only a single intraband plasmon will dominate the interacting spectrum . we additionally note that the static limit property for which the polarization is a constant @xmath394 for @xmath395 , discussed in sec . [ static limit ] , extends also to an area of finite @xmath52 . the interacting spectrum is shown in fig . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf3 ] by plotting @xmath180 for the interaction strength @xmath261 . for @xmath393 and @xmath261 . we add an artificial damping in the regions of @xmath363 to make the plasmons visible . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf3],width=158 ] even for this large coulomb interaction , we only find the intraband plasmon . this is as expected due to the combined effects of fermi blocking of interband excitations and increased spectral weight for intraband transitions . the interband plasmon lies in the large overlap of inter- and intraband spectrum , cf . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf01 ] ( b ) , and it is therefore heavily damped and not visible in the overall spectrum . [ [ intermediate - doping - of - x_f1 ] ] intermediate doping of @xmath396 : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + for intermediate doping levels like @xmath396 , a mixture of dirac and 2deg behaviour is expected , due to the similar importance of inter- and intraband excitations . we plot the polarization function @xmath239 in fig . [ fig : imp bhz xf1 ] . . the red line indicates @xmath95 . [ fig : imp bhz xf1],title="fig:",width=158 ] . the red line indicates @xmath95 . [ fig : imp bhz xf1],title="fig:",width=158 ] indeed , the single - particle spectrum in panel ( a ) looks like a combination of figs . [ fig : imp bhz xf01 ] ( a ) and [ fig : imp bhz xf3 ] ( a ) . while the the shape of the polarization resembles the one of the 2deg , the interband spectrum is now more pronounced and even dominating for @xmath397 . therefore we could expect both kinds of excitations giving rise to a plasmon mode . the real part of @xmath388 in panel ( b ) shows again just a single minimum , following the upper boundary of the intraband spectrum . the deviations from the constant behaviour @xmath394 for @xmath395 in the case of intermediate doping , see sec . [ static limit ] , are also found for finite @xmath52 . the interacting spectrum is shown in fig . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf1 ] by plotting @xmath180 for an interaction strength @xmath261 . for @xmath396 with @xmath261 . we add an artificial damping in the regions of @xmath363 to make the plasmons visible . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf1],width=158 ] it is dominated by a single resonance , lying above the intraband part of the single - particle spectrum . for small momenta , this resonance corresponds to the intraband plasmon . yet for intermediate momenta , a comparison with the interband plasmon dispersion in fig . [ fig : im epsi bhz xf01 ] ( b ) indicates that also the interband plasmon contributes to the resonance . a clear distinction between the two is then not possible anymore . in summary , doping the system offers the possibility to change the excitations spectrum on the fermi scale from a dirac to a 2deg type . the interacting excitation spectrum is usually governed by a single intraband plasmon , while the interband plasmon is hidden in the single - particle background . only large interaction strengths offer a possibility to see both plasmons in the spectrum . in the following , we will now analyze the influence of both broken p - h symmetry and finite masses , which both offer a way to separate the two plasmons and make them visible in the total spectrum . a broken particle - hole symmetry , @xmath398 , with small or vanishing mass is the experimental relevant case for hgte qws . it also offers the possibility of blocking the interband spe spectrum close to the minimal excitation energy @xmath387 , resulting in less damped interband plasmons @xcite . here , we want to use a similar effect for the intraband excitations in order to separate the inter- and intraband spectrum as well as the two plasmon modes . the broken p - h symmetry introduces an inflection point into the spectrum , @xmath399 , with momentum @xmath400 and energy @xmath401 . for @xmath402 , it lies in the hole part [ @xmath92 ] of the spectrum . with a sufficiently small fermi momentum , @xmath404 , the highest energy intraband excitations involve the dirac point for momenta on the order of the fermi momentum , see fig . [ fig : bhz spectrum finite d ] . . both low energy interband excitations ( red arrow ) and high energy intraband excitations ( green arrow ) involve the dirac point . [ fig : bhz spectrum finite d],width=207 ] the same is true for the lowest energy interband excitations . due to the vanishing density of states at the dirac point , both kind of excitations are suppressed , and therefore inter- and intraband spe spectrum are effectively separated in energy and momentum . this situation is shown in fig . [ fig : polarization bhz abkinf12 ] ( a ) ( a ) and @xmath93 ( b ) for @xmath405 and @xmath174 . the red line indicates @xmath95 . [ fig : polarization bhz abkinf12],title="fig:",width=158 ] ( a ) and @xmath93 ( b ) for @xmath405 and @xmath174 . the red line indicates @xmath95 . [ fig : polarization bhz abkinf12],title="fig:",width=158 ] and fig . [ fig : im eps bhz abkinf12 ] ( c)-(e ) , where the imaginary part of the polarization goes to zero between inter- and intraband parts of the spectrum , fully separating them . there , we choose @xmath406 , @xmath174 and @xmath173 . this blocking effect holds for small momenta up to roughly @xmath407 , indicated by the black vertical line in fig . [ fig : polarization bhz abkinf12 ] at @xmath408 . for larger momenta the high energy intraband excitation go from deep in the valence band directly to the fermi surface - the blocking effect of the dirac point is gone , see dashed arrow in fig . [ fig : bhz spectrum finite d ] . in fig . [ fig : polarization bhz abkinf12 ] ( b ) , @xmath93 shows one major difference in comparison to the p - h symmetric case of weak doping in fig . [ fig : imp bhz xf01 ] ( b ) . at the border of intra- and interband spectrum a strong antiscreening region is formed . for sufficiently low @xmath70 a plasmon should exist there , clearly separated from the second antiscreening region at higher @xmath52 , giving rise to the possibility of observing both intra- and interband plasmons . this can be seen in fig . [ fig : im eps bhz abkinf12 ] , where we plot @xmath180 for @xmath405 , @xmath174 , @xmath173 and @xmath409 ( a ) and @xmath260 ( b ) . ( c)-(e ) show linecuts for fixed @xmath410 , @xmath411 and @xmath412 , respectively , with @xmath413 in black solid line , red dot - dashed line , blue long dashed line and green short dashed line , respectively . the black , vertical line separates the inter- and intraband spe region . [ fig : im eps bhz abkinf12],title="fig:",width=158 ] for @xmath405 , @xmath174 , @xmath173 and @xmath409 ( a ) and @xmath260 ( b ) . ( c)-(e ) show linecuts for fixed @xmath410 , @xmath411 and @xmath412 , respectively , with @xmath413 in black solid line , red dot - dashed line , blue long dashed line and green short dashed line , respectively . the black , vertical line separates the inter- and intraband spe region . [ fig : im eps bhz abkinf12],title="fig:",width=158 ] for @xmath405 , @xmath174 , @xmath173 and @xmath409 ( a ) and @xmath260 ( b ) . ( c)-(e ) show linecuts for fixed @xmath410 , @xmath411 and @xmath412 , respectively , with @xmath413 in black solid line , red dot - dashed line , blue long dashed line and green short dashed line , respectively . the black , vertical line separates the inter- and intraband spe region . [ fig : im eps bhz abkinf12],title="fig:",width=158 ] for @xmath405 , @xmath174 , @xmath173 and @xmath409 ( a ) and @xmath260 ( b ) . ( c)-(e ) show linecuts for fixed @xmath410 , @xmath411 and @xmath412 , respectively , with @xmath413 in black solid line , red dot - dashed line , blue long dashed line and green short dashed line , respectively . the black , vertical line separates the inter- and intraband spe region . [ fig : im eps bhz abkinf12],title="fig:",width=158 ] for @xmath405 , @xmath174 , @xmath173 and @xmath409 ( a ) and @xmath260 ( b ) . ( c)-(e ) show linecuts for fixed @xmath410 , @xmath411 and @xmath412 , respectively , with @xmath413 in black solid line , red dot - dashed line , blue long dashed line and green short dashed line , respectively . the black , vertical line separates the inter- and intraband spe region . [ fig : im eps bhz abkinf12],title="fig:",width=158 ] for @xmath409 ( a ) and @xmath260 ( b ) . panel ( c ) - ( e ) show line cuts for fixed momenta @xmath414 and different interaction strengths @xmath413 . for large interaction strength @xmath409 , the intraband plasmon decays into the interband spe spectrum , see panel ( a ) for @xmath415 and the green short dashed line in panel ( c ) . most of the spectral weight stays there also for larger momenta , as @xmath180 is close to 0 in the intraband spe region and the resonance between inter- and intraband spe spectrum is weak . the latter can be best seen in the insets of panel ( d ) and ( e ) , represented by the green short dashed line peaked slightly above [ ( d ) ] or below [ ( e ) ] the black vertical line separating intra- and interband spe region . yet even with the peak being small , it indicates the formation of a slighly damped plasmon , but with small spectral weight . the missing spectral weight is transferred to higher energies into the interband spe region . for intermediate momenta , a second plasmon branch forms , see panel ( a ) for @xmath416 and the second peak of the green short dashed line in the inset of panel ( d ) . for even higher momenta , @xmath417 , it overlaps with the forming interband plasmon leading to a broad charge resonance without clear peak , see green short dashed line in panel ( e ) for @xmath418 . the picture changes for smaller interaction strength . for @xmath260 , the intraband plasmon decays in the region between inter- and intraband spe spectrum , indicated by the strong peak of the blue long dashed line in panel ( c ) . as the single - particle excitations in this region are suppressed due to the dirac point , the plasmon leads to a high and narrow peak of @xmath180 . considering larger momenta @xmath419 , the resonance is split : one part forms an intraband plasmon in the intraband spe region , see blue long dashed line peaked slightly below the black vertical line in panels ( d ) and ( e ) . the second part stays in the interband spe region , where it enhances the spe peak [ black line in the inset of panel ( d ) ] for intermediate momenta @xmath416 . for momenta @xmath420 , an interband plasmon forms , as shown in panel ( e ) . there , the broad single - particle peak [ black line ] around @xmath421 gets reshaped into a clear peaked resonance [ blue long dashed line ] - the interband plasmon . taking the experimental parameters from sec . [ sec : experimental_parameters ] , @xmath119 and @xmath120 , one finds for the plots in fig . [ fig : im eps bhz abkinf12 ] the fermi momentum @xmath422 and chemical potential @xmath423 . the plot range is therefore @xmath424q_{0}=\left[0,0.3\right]\frac{1}{\mathrm{nm}}$ ] and @xmath425\mathrm{\frac{e_{0}}{\hbar}}=\left[0,210\right]\mathrm{thz}$ ] and thus of the right order of magnitude for experimental techniques like raman spectroscopy or electron loss spectroscopy . both plasmonic resonances in fig . [ fig : im eps bhz abkinf12 ] ( b ) overlap for @xmath415 , before they separate for higher momenta . therefore the question arises whether one can really speak of a clear distinction between inter- and intraband plasmons for larger momenta . here , we want to study the f - sum rule and thus the spectral weight of the different excitations . the relative deviations of numerical to analytical f - sum rule are again of the order @xmath280 and thus negligible . [ fig : f - sum numerical doped ] ( a ) of interacting over non - interacting f - sum rule of the interband excitations . black dots are for @xmath271 , blue stars stand for @xmath260 and green triangles for @xmath409 . ( b ) the same for the ratio @xmath426 of the intraband excitations . for all plots : @xmath427 and @xmath428 . [ fig : f - sum numerical doped],title="fig:",width=158 ] of interacting over non - interacting f - sum rule of the interband excitations . black dots are for @xmath271 , blue stars stand for @xmath260 and green triangles for @xmath409 . ( b ) the same for the ratio @xmath426 of the intraband excitations . for all plots : @xmath427 and @xmath428 . [ fig : f - sum numerical doped],title="fig:",width=158 ] shows the ratio of spectral weight in the interband spe region for the interacting over the non - interacting case , @xmath429 , and panel ( b ) the same for the intraband spe region . the intraband plasmon lying between these two regions for @xmath430 is excluded . as for cutoffs @xmath431 one usually has @xmath432 , transfer of spectral weight from one region to the other can lead to quantitatively different relative changes of spectral weight in panels ( a ) and ( b ) . as a key result , we find that there is always spectral weight missing in the intraband spe region . for small momenta , @xmath430 , the weight goes into the undamped intraband plasmon [ this follows directly from the conservation of the f - sum rule for interacting and non - interacting systems ] , while at larger momenta it is transferred to higher energies into the interband spe region . yet , the increase is only about @xmath433 at @xmath420 , such that we can conclude that the plasmon between the inter- and intraband spe region is a pure intraband plasmon with a reduced spectral weight . the plasmon in the interband region is the interband plasmon we know already from the undoped system , see fig . [ fig : intrinsic spectra ] , with a slight increased spectral weight from the intraband spe region . deviations in the thickness of a hg(cd)te qw lead to the opening of a small gap in the bandstructure , resulting in a topological trivial @xmath435 or non - trivial @xmath436 system . apart from the possible appearance of edge states , which is beyond the scope of this paper , a small mass works in opposition to the blocking effect of finite @xmath54 , as it generates a finite density of states for @xmath437 . in the following , we therefore show that the blocking effect of a finite @xmath54 is robust against the opening of small gaps . in fig . [ fig : polarization bhz mabkinf004 ] ( a ) and the interacting one @xmath180 ( b ) with @xmath260 . @xmath438 , @xmath439 and @xmath174 . [ fig : polarization bhz mabkinf004],title="fig:",width=158 ] ( a ) and the interacting one @xmath180 ( b ) with @xmath260 . @xmath438 , @xmath439 and @xmath174 . [ fig : polarization bhz mabkinf004],title="fig:",width=158 ] we plot the non - interacting and interacting spectrum for @xmath174 and a small mass @xmath440 . a comparison with figs . [ fig : polarization bhz abkinf12 ] and [ fig : im eps bhz abkinf12 ] shows that the small mass has just the effect of separating the inter- and intraband spe region additionally . thus we conclude that the idea of observing both plasmons in experiments is robust against slight deviations in the mass and therefore the thickness of the hg(cd)te qw . a finite dirac mass opens a gap in the bandstructure and changes the pseudospin , and therefore the overlap factor , in a non - trivial fashion . thus we can expect in general a quite different behavior for positive and negative mass . yet , for these differences to occur on the intrinsic scale and thus influence the interband plasmons , @xmath441 should be of the order of 1 . in the following , we study such large masses , both negative and positive , with p - h symmetry . while not experimentally relevant for hgte qws , it offers the possibility to study the effect of a topological bandstructure on the electronic excitations , including plasmons . we also note here that the dispersion of the bhz model becomes purely parabolic for the mass @xmath442 : @xmath443 . in this limit , the polarization function , eq . ( [ eq : pi_par ] ) , can be calculated analytically . for the parameters @xmath444 and @xmath60 we plot the polarization @xmath239 in fig . [ fig : im epsi bhz mnab xf033 ] ( a ) and ( b ) . . ( c ) and ( d ) show @xmath180 with @xmath261 and @xmath409 , respectively . @xmath60 and @xmath444 in all plots . [ fig : im epsi bhz mnab xf033],title="fig:",width=158 ] . ( c ) and ( d ) show @xmath180 with @xmath261 and @xmath409 , respectively . @xmath60 and @xmath444 in all plots . [ fig : im epsi bhz mnab xf033],title="fig:",width=158 ] . ( c ) and ( d ) show @xmath180 with @xmath261 and @xmath409 , respectively . @xmath60 and @xmath444 in all plots . [ fig : im epsi bhz mnab xf033],title="fig:",width=158 ] . ( c ) and ( d ) show @xmath180 with @xmath261 and @xmath409 , respectively . @xmath60 and @xmath444 in all plots . [ fig : im epsi bhz mnab xf033],title="fig:",width=158 ] the mass separates intra- and interband spe regions for @xmath445 . compared to the massless cases of @xmath446 , fig . [ fig : imp bhz xf01 ] , and @xmath447 , fig . [ fig : imp bhz xf1 ] , the interband spe spectrum is enhanced due to the combination of enhanced overlap factor and low doping , thus small fermi blockade . due to the flat bandstructure , even for @xmath448 the chemical potential is just barely above the gap . an interesting consequence of this strong interband transition can be seen in panel ( b ) , where we find two distinct areas where @xmath449 becomes negative . as a consequence , inter- and intraband plasmons will always be separated , with the intraband plasmon being confined to low energies . this stems from the fact that the electrons in the conduction band are pseudo - spin polarized , such that intraband excitations to much higher momenta and energies , where the pseudo - spin shows in the opposite direction , are not possible . this is confirmed in panels ( c ) and ( d ) , where we plot @xmath180 with @xmath261 and @xmath409 , respectively . all the spectral weight of the intraband spe region goes into the plasmon , which at least for @xmath409 follows very well the @xmath258 law . the interband spectrum is dominated by the interband plasmon , having of course a much broader peak due to damping ( finite @xmath450 $ ] ) . the dashed , green line in the interband spectrum in fig . [ fig : im epsi bhz mnab xf033 ] indicates the energy , at which excitation processes going from momentum @xmath378 to @xmath379 with @xmath380 are possible , see black , dashed arrow in fig . [ fig : ab bandstructure ] ( a ) . usually suppressed by the overlap factor , a large negative mass enhances the overlap of these excitations to near unity for small fermi momenta . [ fig : im epsi bhz mnab xf033 ] ( b ) and ( d ) show that the interband plasmons mainly occur above this line , indicating that the described excitation process is important for the collective excitation . as the process is forbidden by helicity in the pure dirac system , it is one reason why the bhz model supports intrinsic plasmons while the dirac model does not . for the parameters @xmath444 and @xmath451 we plot the polarization in fig . [ fig : im epsi bhz mab xf033 ] ( a ) and ( b ) . . ( c ) and ( d ) show @xmath180 with @xmath261 and @xmath409 , respectively . @xmath451 and @xmath444 in all plots . [ fig : im epsi bhz mab xf033],title="fig:",width=158 ] . ( c ) and ( d ) show @xmath180 with @xmath261 and @xmath409 , respectively . @xmath451 and @xmath444 in all plots . [ fig : im epsi bhz mab xf033],title="fig:",width=158 ] . ( c ) and ( d ) show @xmath180 with @xmath261 and @xmath409 , respectively . @xmath451 and @xmath444 in all plots . [ fig : im epsi bhz mab xf033],title="fig:",width=158 ] . ( c ) and ( d ) show @xmath180 with @xmath261 and @xmath409 , respectively . @xmath451 and @xmath444 in all plots . [ fig : im epsi bhz mab xf033],title="fig:",width=158 ] compared to the negative mass , the interband spectrum is much weaker . this is a result of the lower overlap factor and the higher chemical potential ( the bandstructure is not as flat as in the ti phase ) , leading to a stronger fermi blockade . for the real part of the polarization , this has the effect that the two former distinct areas of sign reversal now almost merge . the interband excitations are so weak that the minimum @xmath449 always lies closely above the intraband spe region - indicating that it is the main source for plasmons . in panel ( c ) for @xmath261 , one can identify both inter- and intraband plasmon . interestingly , the polarization is clearly higher in the pure interband spe region than in the mixed inter- and intraband spe spectrum , suggesting that the latter one serve as an additional damping for the interband plasmon . going to the smaller interaction strength @xmath409 in panel ( d ) , one finds just a single resonance following the upper boundary of the intraband spe spectrum . thus we conclude that the interacting spectrum for moderate interaction strength is governed by just intraband plasmons . the interband excitations are too weak to support an additional plasmon but for very high interactions - a consequence of the effective decoupling of the bands by the overlap factor . we have analyzed the dynamical and static polarization properties in random phase approximation of hg(cd)te quantum wells described by the bernevig - hughes - zhang ( bhz ) model . in the static undoped limit , due to the presence of quadratic terms in the bhz model and hence to the natural length scale @xmath452 , the induced charge density in response to a test charge has a finite spatial extent . this is in contrast to the point - like screening charge obtained with the continuous dirac model of graphene . in the doped regime , we have observed friedel oscillations with an intermediate decay behavior between the dirac ( @xmath338 ) and the 2deg ( @xmath234 ) cases . the discussion of the full dynamical polarization function has been focused on the appearance of new interband plasmons due to the interplay of dirac and schrdinger physics . in principle , we expect these plasmons to appear in multiband systems where the imaginary part of the polarization function decays faster with energy than the one in the dirac case ( @xmath373 ) , which is the case for the bhz model ( decay as @xmath453 ) . these plasmons appear already in the undoped system at experimentally relevant parameters , but it is also possible to observe them in the doped regime , where they coexists with the usual intraband plasmons . this is favored by broken particle hole symmetry in the bhz model , which allows for the presence of both a dirac point and an inflection point in the bandstructure . the behavior of these two collective modes is also influenced by the topology of the bandstructure . indeed the two plasmons tend to merge into one another in a gapped trivial insulator , while they remain distinct resonances in the topological insulator phase . we have shown that these new plasmons should appear for momenta and energies on the right order of magnitude for experimental techniques like raman spectroscopy or electron loss spectroscopy on hg(cd)te quantum wells . the wide range of parameters considered in this paper , including the regime of topological trivial and non - trivial insulators , should make our results applicable to all kinds of materials described by phenomenological models interpolating between dirac and schrdinger fermion physics . throughout this article , we have only discussed bulk excitations of this peculiar two - dimensional system . hence , we have totally ignored the influence of edge states in the topologically non - trivial regime of the model in the presence of physical boundaries . an extension of our analysis to finite size systems might yield exciting new physics , where we expect an interplay of one - dimensional and two - dimensional collective charge excitations . we acknowledge interesting discussions with e. hankiewicz , m. polini , t. stauber and financial support by the dfg ( spp1666 and the dfg - jst research unit _ topotronics _ ) , the helmholtz foundation ( viti ) , and the enb graduate school on topological insulators . Abstract:
[ "under certain conditions , hg(cd)te quantum wells ( qws ) are known to realize a time - reversal symmetric , two - dimensional topological insulator phase . its low - energy excitations are well - described by the phenomenological bernevig - hughes - zhang ( bhz ) model that interpolates between schrdinger and dirac fermion physics . we study the polarization function of this model in random phase approximation ( rpa ) in the intrinsic limit and at finite doping . while the polarization properties in rpa of dirac and schrdinger particles are two comprehensively studied problems , our analysis of the bhz model bridges the gap between these two limits , shedding light on systems with intermediate properties . we gain insight into the screening properties of the system and on its characteristic plasma oscillations . interestingly , we discover two different kinds of plasmons that are related to the presence of intra- and interband excitations . observable signatures of these plasmons are carefully analyzed in a variety of distinct parameter regimes , including the experimentally relevant ones for hg(cd)te qws . we conclude that the discovered plasmons are observable by raman or electron loss spectroscopy ." ]
16,063
16,063
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in recent years , uv and optical photometry and spectroscopy of nearby elliptical galaxies has suggested that these galaxies , which have a reputation for being old , red , and dead , may not be quite as dead as previously assumed . between a few percent to 30% of local ellipticals appear to be experiencing low levels of ongoing star formation activity @xcite . the star formation is not intense enough to affect the galaxies morphological classification , as it only amounts to a few percent of the total stellar mass . however , this disk growth inside spheroidal galaxies may be a faint remnant of a process that was more vigorous in the past and may have played a role in establishing the range of galaxy morphologies we observe today . star formation , of course , requires cold gas , so interpreting the uv and optical data in terms of star formation activity has important implications both for the early - type galaxies and for a general understanding of the star formation process . it is not obvious that star formation should `` work '' the same way inside spheroidal galaxies as it does inside disks , with the same efficiency , the same dependence on the gas surface density , or the same regulatory mechanisms . for example , it has been hypothesized that even if there is a molecular disk inside an elliptical or lenticular galaxy , the disk would probably be stabilized by the galaxy s steep gravitational potential @xcite . thus it is of interest to probe the relationships between molecular gas and star formation activity in early - type galaxies . it is not as straightforward , however , to measure star formation rates in early - type galaxies as it is in spirals . nebular line emission is common in ellipticals @xcite , but it is usually not thought to be associated with star formation . its distribution is generally smooth , centrally peaked , and sometimes filamentary @xcite ; its morphology and line ratios suggest ionization sources such as agn activity , evolved stars , or cooling from the hot gas phase rather than star formation . far - ir ( fir ) and cm - wave radio continuum emission are also commonly used as tracers of star formation activity in gas - rich spirals , but agns and the evolved stellar population have been identified as the sources of mid - ir ( mir ) and fir emission in most elliptical galaxies @xcite . here we investigate evidence for and against star formation activity in a sample of elliptical and lenticular galaxies that have unusually large molecular gas contents . we make use of matched - resolution images of the molecular gas distribution , the cm - wave radio continuum and the 24 intensity . the properties of more typical , co - poor early - type galaxies are reviewed so that they can provide a comparison sample for the co - rich early - type galaxies . we then present the morphology of the 24 emission , with simple parametric fits and comparisons to molecular gas , radio continuum , and optical images that show dust disks in silhouette . the mid - ir and far - ir flux densities of the co - rich galaxies are presented along with discussion of the 24 to 2 flux density ratios and the fir / radio flux density ratios as diagnostics of whether the mid- to far - ir emission has a circumstellar or star formation origin . the results are mixed ; in some cases it is clear that the 24 emission is primarily associated with star formation , and in other cases heating by the evolved stellar population or even by an agn are inferred . thus , the results are at least qualitatively consistent with the suggestions that present - day star formation activity may be occurring in substantial numbers of local early - type galaxies . the isocam and isophot instruments aboard the _ infrared space observatory _ provided some insight into the variety of processes that contribute to the mid - ir and far - ir emission of early - type galaxies . for example , a handful of elliptical and lenticular galaxies found their way into the _ iso _ atlas of bright spiral galaxies and are discussed by @xcite with particular reference to the rate and distribution of star formation activity . the 12 images show very little emission beyond their galaxies nuclei . in @xcite , enhanced mir and fir to @xmath1 flux density ratios are used as star formation indicators . it is not at all obvious that this interpretation is accurate for early - type galaxies , but in most of these cases the ratios are consistent with interstellar radiation fields due to the old stellar population so little if any star formation activity is inferred . there are a minority of e - s0/a galaxies whose fir/@xmath1 flux density ratios ( within a 15 aperture ) are as high as the median values for sb - scd spirals , suggesting the possibility of star formation activity . @xcite fit the spectral energy distributions ( seds ) and compared 15 images to optical and near - ir images for a sample of 18 ellipticals , dwarf ellipticals , and lenticulars . in two cases they found no evidence for excess 15 emission over the stellar photospheric emission ; in most of the rest of the sample there is such an excess and it is smoothly distributed , more or less following the stellar distribution . a few targets show thermal emission at 15 from the dust that is visible in silhouette in the optical images , and two show agn emission ( a nuclear point source and even some synchrotron radiation from the jet in m87 ) . thus , in early - type galaxies the stellar photospheres , circumstellar dust , silhouette dust lanes or disks , agn , and ( possibly ) star formation all contribute in the mid - ir images . fourteen galaxies classified as e , s0 , or s0/a were observed as part of the spitzer infrared nearby galaxies survey ( sings ; * ? ? ? eleven of these were detected up to 160 and the 24 morphologies of these galaxies are discussed by bendo et al . ( 2007 ) . with a couple of exceptions , such as ngc 1316 ( which has asymmetric extended emission over 2 ) and ngc 5866 ( which contains an edge - on disk ) , these early - type galaxies tended to have only poorly resolved nuclear emission at 24 . six of the 11 also have published co observations @xcite , and four of the six are detected . ngc 5866 is notably co - rich , as a large amount of molecular gas ( 4.4 ) is very clearly detected by @xcite . however , maps of the molecular gas distributions in most of these galaxies are not currently available . mips observations of more typically co - poor elliptical galaxies have also been published by @xcite and @xcite . of the 19 galaxies analyzed by @xcite , 13 have been searched for co emission and none have been detected @xcite . @xcite show that the 24 emission from their ellipticals follows the @xmath2 near - ir surface brightness profiles very closely . the 24 emission even has the same effective radius as in @xmath1 ; the ratio of two radii is found to be 0.96 with a dispersion of 0.20 . in addition , @xcite have shown that the 24 emission globally tracks the optical luminosity in elliptical galaxies as there is a tight linear correlation between the 24flux density and the @xmath3-band flux density . this 24 emission is interpreted to be circumstellar dust from the mass loss of post main sequence stars . in short , several processes may contribute to mir emission from early - type galaxies . in the majority of the elliptical galaxies that are not co - rich the 24 emission seems to either follow the stellar photospheric emission or a nuclear source . extended 15 and 24 emission has been observed from a few early - type galaxies that are very rich in molecular gas or that exhibit silhouetted dust . until now , however , it has been rare to be able to compare the distribution of possible star formation activity in early - type galaxies to that of the molecular gas , the raw material for the star formation . most early surveys for molecular gas in early - type galaxies were strongly biased towards fir - bright targets , with a typical selection criterion having an iras 100 flux density @xmath4 1 jy @xcite . more recent co searches are not fir - biased , but they still find significant molecular gas contents . @xcite reached a surprisingly high co detection rate of @xmath5 in a volume - limited sample of nearby field lenticular galaxies , and @xcite detected co emission in @xmath6 of a similar sample of field ellipticals . @xcite also detected co emission in @xmath7 of the early - type galaxies in the sauron survey @xcite , a representative sample that uniformly fills an optical magnitude apparent axis ratio space . thus , the co detection rates in ellipticals and lenticulars are high enough to support the uv - inferred incidence of star formation activity ( if that gas does indeed engage in star formation ) . the cold gas masses are highly variable in these detections , with @xmath8 in the range @xmath9 to @xmath10 and lower . since we are interested in morphology as a means of distinguishing the origin of the mir , fir , and radio emission , we have selected for this project some of the relatively few elliptical and lenticular galaxies with maps resolving their molecular gas distribution @xcite . because of the way galaxies were selected for co mapping , the targets were already known to be fir - bright and to have concentrations of molecular gas in their centers ( as opposed to their outskirts ) . we also apply a criterion on the angular extent of the molecular gas to be able to test the correspondence between the molecular gas and 24 emission . if the 24 emission arises in star formation activity , we expect it to trace the molecular gas . if the 24 emission is related to agn activity , we expect it to be a point source , and if it comes from circumstellar dust , it should trace the stellar distribution . thus , we required the targets to have molecular gas in structures on the order of 20 to 30 or more in diameter . corresponding dust emission , if present , should be resolved in the 24 images . the targets distances range up to 80 mpc and optical luminosities are in the range @xmath11 ( table [ sampletable ] ) . observations of ugc 1503 , ngc 807 , ngc 2320 , ngc 3032 , ngc 3656 , ngc 4476 , and ngc 5666 were made with the mips instrument at 24 , 70 , and 160 in project 20780 of cycle go-2 . the data were taken in photometry mode using the large field size in all cases . relatively short exposures were used to avoid saturation on these bright sources in medium - high background regions . exposures were made in four cycles of 10 seconds at 24 , with sky offsets of 300 , and in 8 cycles of 3 seconds at 160 . observations at 70 were made in the fixed cluster - offsets mode with offsets @xmath12 80 , and 8 cycles of 3 seconds . to maximize the morphological information recoverable at 70 the fine pixel scale was used . however , most sources were not expected to be usefully resolved at 160 so the single pointing ( rather than a raster map ) was used at the longer wavelength . data for ngc 4526 were obtained from gto project 69 ( pi : fazio ) . those observations consist of a 10s exposure at 24 using the small field with a 300 sky offset , 3 cycles of 3 seconds at 70 using the default pixel scale and small field , and 3 cycles of 3 seconds at 160 in the default pixel scale in a 3-by-1 raster map . data for ngc 4459 were obtained from go project 3649 ( pi : cte ) ; the observing modes are similar to those for ngc 4526 except that the exposure times are 10 cycles of 4 seconds at 24 , 10 cycles of 5 seconds at 70 , and 10 cycles of 6 seconds at 160 . the 24 , 70 , and 160 @xmath13 m images were created from raw data frames using the mips data analysis tools ( mips dat ; * ? ? ? * ) version 3.10 along with additional processing steps . the processing steps for the 70 and 160 @xmath13 m data are similar , but the steps for the 24 @xmath13 m data are significantly different from these other two bands . therefore , the 24 @xmath13 m data processing is described first followed by descriptions of the 70 and 160 @xmath13 m data processing . the individual 24 @xmath13 m frames were first processed through a droop correction ( removing an excess signal in each pixel that is proportional to the signal in the entire array ) and were corrected for non - linearity in the ramps . the dark current was then subtracted . next , scan - mirror - position dependent flats were created from the data in each astronomical observation request ( aor ) and were applied to the data . detector pixels that had measured signals of 2500 dn s@xmath14 in any frame were masked out in the following three frames so as to avoid having latent images appear in the data . next , a scan - mirror - position independent flat was created from the data in each aor and were applied to the data . following this , planes were fit to the zodiacal light emission in the background regions in each frame ( regions falling outside the optical disks of the galaxies that also did not contain any other bright sources ) , and these planes were subtracted from the data . next , a robust statistical analysis was applied in which the values of cospatial pixels from different frames were compared to each other and statistical outliers ( e.g. probable cosmic rays ) are masked out . after this , a final mosaic was made with pixel sizes of @xmath15 , any residual background in the image was subtracted , and the data were calibrated into astronomical units . the calibration factor for the 24 @xmath13 m data is given by @xcite as @xmath16 mjy sr@xmath14 [ mips instrumental unit]@xmath14 . in the 70 and 160 @xmath13 m data processing , the first step was to fit ramps to the reads to derive slopes . in this step , readout jumps and cosmic ray hits were also removed , and an electronic nonlinearity correction was applied . next , the stim flash frames taken by the instrument were used as responsivity corrections . the dark current was subtracted from the data , and an illumination correction was applied . short term variations in the the signal ( often referred to as drift ) were removed from the 70 @xmath13 m data ; this also subtracted the background from the data . next , a robust statistical analysis was applied to cospatial pixels from different frames in which statistical outliers ( e.g. pixels affected by cosmic rays ) were masked out . once this was done , final mosaics were made using square pixels of 4.5 for the 70 @xmath13 m data and 9 for the 160 @xmath13 m data . the backgrounds in the 160 @xmath13 m data and the residual backgrounds in the 70 @xmath13 m data were measured in regions outside the optical disks of the galaxies and subtracted , and then flux calibration factors were applied to the data . the 70 @xmath13 m calibration factors given by @xcite are @xmath17 mjy sr@xmath14 [ mips instrumental unit]@xmath14 for coarse - scale imaging and @xmath18 mjy sr@xmath14 [ mips instrumental unit]@xmath14 for fine - scale imaging . the 160 @xmath13 m calibration factor is given by @xcite as @xmath19 mjy sr@xmath14 [ mips instrumental unit]@xmath14 . an additional 70 @xmath13 m nonlinearity correction given as @xmath20 by @xcite was applied to coarse - scale imaging data where the surface brightness exceeded 66 mjy sr@xmath14 . for analyzing the radial profiles of the 70 and 160 @xmath13 m data and for creating accurate models of the spatial distribution of 24 @xmath13 m emission , we needed point spread functions ( psfs ) that accurately represent the observed psfs . while the stinytim model @xcite can be used to model the psf , the model output does not match the observed psf of point sources . this is because the model assumes that the psf is infinitesimally subsampled , whereas the observed psf is measured with pixels that effectively blur some of the fine features . one approach to circumvent this problem is to simply smooth the model psf @xcite . as an alternative approach , we created a set of empirical psfs from archival data . the 24 and 70 @xmath13 m psfs were constructed using archival mips photometry mode data from program 20496 ( pi : marscher ) of 3c 273 , 3c 279 , and bl lac , which are relatively point - like infrared sources at these wavelengths . data from a total of 25 aors were used . these data were processed using the same techniques described in section [ reduction ] except that the final mosaics were made for each aor , and the images axes were left in the native instrumental rotation instead of being aligned with the j2000 coordinate system . the final psfs were created by normalizing the flux densities of every mosaic to 1 and then median combining the frames from all aors , which filtered out extended emission such as a tail - like feature extending north of 3c 273 . mips 160 photometry mode observations of compact sources typically do not completely sample the psf , so we needed to use scan map data to create a psf at this wavelength . in this case , we used sings data of mrk 33 , ngc 1266 , ngc 1377 , ngc 3265 , and ngc 3773 to create the psf . these galaxies were selected because they are galaxies from sings that are unresolved or marginally resolved at 24 @xmath13 m , so we can safely assume that the 160 @xmath13 m counterparts are also unresolved . these data were processed in the same way as the 160 @xmath13 m photometry data for the elliptical galaxies in this paper except that an additional drift removal step was applied to the data , separate final mosaics were made for each aor , and the images axes were left in the native instrumental rotation . as with the 24 and 70 @xmath13 m psfs , the final psf was created by normalizing the flux densities of every mosaic to 1 and then median combining the frames from all aors . the 70 and 160 emission from our co - rich targets is very poorly resolved , so no detailed morphological analysis was done in these bands . however , the 24 emission is resolved , and simple model fits are made to parametrize the 24 morphologies . we used the image fitting techniques described by @xcite to characterize the spatial distribution of the 24 @xmath13 m dust emission and to measure the flux densities of the galaxies . these techniques have been improved in several ways compared to the models that @xcite applied to the sombrero galaxy . first , we are now using the empirical psfs described above instead of the stinytim theoretical psfs . with these psfs , we can more accurately model the region near the centers of these galaxies . second , we now treat the central coordinates of each model component as free parameters . the models used in this paper include unresolved point sources , inclined exponential disks , de vaucouleurs ( @xmath21 ) profiles , and rings with exponential profiles as well as combinations of these , all of which are convolved with the empirical 24 @xmath13 m psf . in addition to the co observations cited above , we also compare the mid - ir morphology to that of the 1.4 ghz radio continuum , the stellar distributions from optical and nir images , and the dust seen in silhouette against the optical continuum . the 1.4 ghz radio continuum emission from galaxies originates in both agn activity and star formation @xcite . active nuclei should be distinguishable as nuclear point sources , perhaps with a jet , whereas kpc - scale extended emission more likely originates from star formation @xcite . radio continuum images ( and one nondetection ) for ugc 1503 , ngc 807 , ngc 3656 , ngc 4476 , and ngc 5666 have been published by @xcite . the first survey @xcite provides radio continuum images of ngc 2320 , ngc 3032 , ngc 4459 , and ngc 4526 . all of these 1.4 ghz images have resolutions on the order of 5 , which facilitates comparisons to the mips 24 images at 6 resolution . table [ radioims ] lists the beam sizes and rms noise levels of the continuum images . it also shows that while the first images have typically a factor of 3 to 4 higher noise levels than our own , they do not have systematically lower signal - to - noise ratios . thus we do not expect significant biases in the detectability of extended structures , for example , between the first images and our own 1.4 ghz data . broadband optical @xmath22 and @xmath23 images of ngc 3032 , ngc 4459 , and ngc 4526 were obtained from the sloan digitized sky survey ( sdss ) . @xmath24 and @xmath25 images of ugc 1503 , ngc 807 , ngc 2320 , and ngc 3656 were obtained by l. van zee in november 2002 with the mini - mosaic imager ( minimo ) on the wiyn 3.5 m telescope and were reduced as described by @xcite . the seeing in those images ranged from 0.9 to 1.3 . @xmath24 and @xmath26 images of ngc 4476 and ngc 5666 were obtained with the kitt peak 2.1 m telescope and t2ka ccd in april 2003 . exposure times for those images were 1200 s in @xmath24 and 1800 s in @xmath26 ; the seeing varied from 1.1 to 1.6 in those images and they were reduced in the same manner as for the wiyn minimo images . finally , wfpc2 images of ngc 3032 , ngc 4459 , and ngc 4526 in the f606w or f555w filters were retrieved from the hst archive along with acs observations of ngc 4476 . the 24 emission from ngc 807 is also compared with the distribution of hi in the galaxy . hi emission was mapped with the national radio astronomy observatory s very large array in its c configuration for 6 hours on 2002 dec 10 and 6 hours on 2002 dec 16 in program ay135 . the total bandwidth was 3.125 mhz centered at 4650 , giving 63 channels of 21.3 . the absolute flux scale , bandpass calibration , and time dependent gain corrections were determined from observations of the nearby source j0137 + 331 . all data calibration and image formation were done using standard calibration tasks in the aips package ; continuum emission was subtracted directly from the visibility data by making first order fits to the line - free channels . the calibrated data were fourier transformed using briggs robust weighting scheme with a robustness parameter of 0.0 , which gave a resolution of @xmath27 and a rms noise level of 0.2 mjy beam@xmath14 . the dirty images were cleaned down to a residual level approximately equal to the rms noise fluctuations . the integrated intensity image was made by smoothing , clipping , and then summing the cleaned data cube in a manner similar to that used by @xcite . none of the co - rich early - type galaxies are pure point sources at 24 . all are resolved , though they are significantly less extended than the stellar distributions in the nir and optical . total flux densities at 24 are thus derived from large aperture photometry in the sky - subtracted images . unrelated point sources were first cleaned from the vicinity of the target using the task _ imedit _ in iraf , and the total flux densities were summed in a series of circular apertures up to 60 pixels ( 90 ) in radius . the total flux densities converge to within @xmath28 for radii @xmath29 75 , and therefore table [ fluxes ] quotes the flux density within the 75 aperture . a color correction is derived based on the power law index @xmath30 ( @xmath31 between the 24 and 70 flux densities ; the power law indices range from @xmath32 to @xmath33 . these indices are consistent with the mid - ir spectra of nearby galaxies presented by @xcite . the color corrections tabulated by @xcite are 0.960 to 0.967 . the dominant uncertainty in the flux densities is that of the absolute calibration , roughly 4% @xcite . the 70 and 160 emission generally appear unresolved ( section [ 70 - 160 ] ) , so we treated these as point sources when measuring flux densities at these wavelengths . to select aperture and color corrections for the 70 and 160 @xmath13 m data , we first fit the 60 - 160 @xmath13 m iras and _ spitzer _ data with unmodified blackbody functions to roughly characterize the seds . the typical color temperatures derived from these fits were @xmath34 - 50 k. we choose to measure flux densities in the 70 data within an aperture of 81 radius , as it is the maximum aperture that stays entirely within the field - of - view of our 70 images . @xcite do not specifically quote an aperture correction for these parameters , so we derived that correction factor . the stinytim model @xcite was used to create 60-wide model psfs for blackbodies with temperatures of 30 , 40 , and 50 k. after estimating the `` background '' level in an annulus of radii 81 to 100 , we measured the fraction of the total flux density in a circle of radius 81 . this procedure gives an aperture correction of @xmath35 . we also verified that we were able to reproduce the aperture corrections quoted in @xcite to within 1% . we take the color correction for a black body of temperature 40 10 k as 0.886 0.015 @xcite . in most of our targets , the dominant contribution to the uncertainty in the 70 flux density is that of the absolute calibration scale ( 10% for fine scale data and 5% for coarse scale data , * ? ? ? . however , the images of ngc 2320 and ngc 4476 still suffer from some negative artifacts just outside the first airy ring . initial exploration suggests that the 70 flux densities of these galaxies may be 20% and 10% low , respectively . flux densities in the 160 images were measured in an aperture of radius 64 with sky background determined in an annulus of radii 80 to 160 . for this aperture and a psf approximately represented by a 40 k blackbody , we take an aperture correction from @xcite as an interpolation between a 30 k and a 50 k blackbody , which gives 1.3575 0.0035 . the color correction , assuming a blackbody of 40 10 k , is 0.9640.010 @xcite . for ngc 4459 and ngc 4526 , the small fields of view made it difficult to estimate the background level and flux densities for these two should be treated with greater caution . aside from the background level and the nonlinearity effect discussed below , the dominant contribution to uncertainty in the 160 flux densities is the absolute calibration scale ( 12% , * ? ? ? additional uncertainties in the flux densities come from the fact that the targets are bright at 70 and 160 . @xcite have shown that aperture photometry gives systematically lower flux densities than a psf fitting technique , for sources brighter than about 1 jy at 70 . the effect is roughly 5% at 2 jy . the nonlinearity correction of @xcite ( section [ reduction ] ) should mitigate this effect for the coarse scale data of ngc 4526 and ngc 4459 , but the corresponding correction is not known for fine - scale data and the effect could be important for ngc 3032 , ngc 3656 , and ngc 5666 . @xcite also show that sources brighter than 2 jy at 160 are underestimated , with the effect being as large as 20% at 4 jy . finally , we note that since the 160 emission for ngc 807 is slightly resolved its aperture correction may be low . ngc 807 and ngc 5666 also have fir flux density measurements from the iso satellite @xcite . in the case of ngc 807 , the 160flux density of 2.390.29 jy that we derive from the mips data is consistent with the 2.8 0.8 jy measured by temi et al . at 150 . for ngc 5666 , our mips 160 flux density ( 2.480.30 jy ) seems low in comparison with the iso data ( 3.9 1.2 jy at 150 and 2.70.8 jy at 200 ) , but given the sizes of the uncertainties we can not conclude that those three values are inconsistent with each other . we note that the analysis and processing of the mips 160 data is routine , whereas the iso data for ngc 807 and ngc 5666 were obtained with the pht 32 mode , which is known to suffer from strong transient effects that make it difficult to calibrate @xcite . far - ir spectral energy distributions for our targets are shown in figure [ sedplot ] , where we have included the 60 and 100 iras flux densities and 350 observations of @xcite ( see table [ q ] ) . the seds are similar to those of the `` typical '' spiral galaxy from the sings survey @xcite , but with 70/160 colors slightly warmer than that of a typical spiral and 24/70 colors slightly cooler than the spiral . the iras 60 and 100 flux densities , mips 70 and 160 flux densities and ( where available ) 350 flux densities have been fitted with a blackbody modified with an emissivity @xmath36 to characterize the dust temperatures in these galaxies . these color temperatures are given in table [ fluxes ] . we find that the modified blackbody temperatures of 25 - 28 k for most of these galaxies are a few degrees warmer than the average color temperatures for spiral galaxies found by @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite , which range from @xmath37 k to @xmath38 k depending on the number of thermal components and combinations of wave bands used . however , the color temperatures of the early - type galaxies in this paper are similar to the color temperatures measured in early - type galaxies by @xcite and @xcite . in contrast , the color temperatures of 22 - 23 k measured for ngc 807 and ngc 2320 are closer to those of spiral galaxies than to other elliptical and so galaxies . if the dust opacities in the diffuse ism of most early - type galaxies are low , the dust producing the fir cirrus emission could be bathed in a somewhat more intense or harder radiation field than is typical for spirals . this scenario could explain the higher color temperatures measured in the 60350 range . however , since 24 emisson primarily traces hot dust associated with star - forming regions in spiral galaxies , the 24 emission in these early - type galaxies could be relatively faint compared to the cirrus emission if these galaxies contain relatively little star formation compared to their dust content . in all of the targets , the 24 emission is resolved . a variety of structures ( point sources , rings , disks , and @xmath2 profiles ) are evident in the images and are discussed in greater detail below . the interpretation of these structures is complicated by the fact that the 24 intensity is a function of both the dust surface density and the illuminating radiation field . possible dust heating sources include the post - main sequence stellar population , star formation regions , and agn . ( none of our targets have strong enough radio jets for spatially resolved synchrotron emission to be important at 24 . ) thus , the 24 emission by itself may not necessarily indicate the presence of star formation . however , evidence from the co and radio continuum helps to resolve some of these ambiguities . for example , star formation is expected to be accompanied by cm - wave radio continuum emission @xcite , whereas dust heated by the radiation from evolved stars would not be . therefore the comparisons with the distribution of the molecular gas ( the raw material for star formation ) and the radio continuum provide constraints on the origin of the 24 emission . for each galaxy we consider in detail the evidence for star formation activity , with a particular view to distinguishing how much of the 24 emission is due to star formation . we take the molecular gas to be the raw material , so that star formation should only be found within the co disks . we ask whether the radio continuum emission is resolved on scales similar to the molecular gas , which ( if true ) suggests that the radio continuum does not arise in agn activity . we investigate whether the 24 emission or its morphological sub - components are distributed like the radio continuum and molecular gas , which would strongly suggest star formation activity . a schematic summary is found in table [ schematic ] with brief comments and additional evidence from the fir / radio flux density ratios , optical emission lines , stellar populations or galex colors where those are available . the fir / radio flux density ratios are discussed in greater detail in section [ radiofir ] . figure [ u1503 ] presents optical , unsharp - masked , 24 , co , and radio images of ugc 1503 . in addition , a smooth galaxy model was constructed using the multi - gaussian expansion technique of @xcite and the top left panel of the figure shows the ratio of the original @xmath24 image to the mge model . the unsharp - masked @xmath24 image shows some fairly subtle mottling in the interior of the galaxy , with perhaps some hint of flocculent arm segments at radii less than about 10 . this is the same region where we find a regularly rotating molecular gas disk ( radius 15 = 5.2 kpc ) . the radio continuum emission is also found in an asymmetric ring of similar size . the 24 image shows a central dip , which we have verified is not due to saturation , and this image is well fit with a ring of radius 4.8 @xmath39 3.5 ( 1.6 @xmath39 1.2 kpc ) . table [ fittable ] gives the best - fit parameters describing the model of ugc 1503 and the other galaxies . a dust distribution following the stellar photospheric emission would be centrally peaked , unlike the 24 emission of ugc 1503 . in addition , if an annulus of dust in ugc 1503 were illuminated by an old stellar population it could conceivably reproduce the 24image , but as discussed above one would have to appeal to some other process for the origin of the radio continuum ring . for these reasons we argue that the simplest explanation for the co , radio and fir morphologies of ugc 1503 is that star formation is taking place in an annulus of the molecular / dust disk . the fir / radio flux density ratios support this interpretation , as discussed further in section [ discussion ] . while the global similarities between radio continuum and 24morphology indicate that star formation activity in a @xmath40 1.6 kpc ring powers them both , the details of their morphologies have implications for the propagation of the star formation through the galaxy . as figure [ u1503 ] suggests , the ridgeline of the radio continuum ring is clearly outside the ridgeline of the 24ring , so that the two most prominent radio peaks are 3 to 4 away from corresponding 24 peaks . the effect is not caused by a difference in spatial resolution of the two bands ; the radio continuum image has somewhat better resolution ( 5 @xmath39 4.5 @xmath40 1.7 kpc ) than the 24 image ( 6 ) , and the absolute registration ought to be good to 1 or better . neither is this the effect described in some detail by @xcite , in which the radio continuum emission looks like a smoothed version of the mir or fir image because the diffusion length of cosmic ray electrons is larger than the mean free path of the photons that heat the dust . instead , as the radio continuum emission has a longer rise and decay timescale than fir emission after a burst of star formation activity @xcite , this offset could indicate that the star formation activity is propagating inward or that the star formation rate is decreasing more strongly in the outer parts of the ring than the inner parts . figure [ n807 ] shows the 24 emission from ngc 807 along with an optical image , optical dust maps , co line emission and 20 cm radio continuum emission . the dust distribution traced in the @xmath41 color map and in the mge residuals suggests a symmetric , dynamically relaxed disk . the 24 emission from ngc 807 shows an unresolved peak on the nucleus of the galaxy , an elongated plateau and a surrounding envelope . the structure of the emission is well fit by a superposition of a nuclear point source ( 3.4 mjy ) , an exponential disk of scale length 17 = 5.4 kpc , and a plateau or a flat - topped inner disk whose flat region has a semimajor axis 11= 3.5 kpc . the two disks each contain roughly 50% of the total 24 flux density and the point source only about 5% of the total . at surface brightness levels of 1.2 @xmath42 and higher ( 20% of the peak ) , the 24 emission shows a high degree of reflection symmetry . that fact is significant because both the molecular gas and radio continuum emission are notably stronger in the southeast and their peaks are 6 southeast of the optical/24nucleus . ( it is worth noting that the radio continuum emission from ngc 807 is quite faint and data of higher sensitivity would be beneficial . ) the nuclear point source component of the 24 image might be related to either an agn or to unresolved nuclear star formation . it is curious , though , that no corresponding nuclear peak is found in the radio continuum emission . the plateau or flat - topped disk component is too extended to be attributed to an agn , and as it does not follow the stellar distribution either , it is unlikely to be the type of circumstellar dust emission discussed by @xcite . this component could conceivably originate in star formation in the molecular disk since its size scale is similar to that of the molecular gas . ( the co dist extends to radii @xmath43 20 , and the plateau is flat to a semimajor axis 11 and declines with a scale length of 4 beyond . ) the third component in ngc 807 , the exponential component with a scale length of 17 , could also conceivably originate in star formation in the molecular gas or it could trace circumstellar emission . if star formation activity strictly depends on the kpc - scale local gas surface density , as in a kennicutt - schmidt relation @xcite , we would expect it to be asymmetrically distributed like the molecular gas . but in the region where the molecular gas is found ( radii less than 20 ) the 24 emission lacks this asymmetry , and this observation suggests that either the 24 emission is not primarily dust heated by star formation or that the local star formation rate is determined by something else in addition to the local gas density . the radio continuum emission does seem consistent with star formation in the molecular gas in both morphology and in total flux density ( section [ discussion ] ) . in linear size this is quite a large star - forming disk ; the radius of the molecular disk is 20= 6 kpc . thus , it seems likely that the 24 emission may arise partly from star formation activity , but it must also include a substantial contribution from more symmetrically distributed heat sources such as an evolved stellar population and a nuclear source . a unique feature of the 24 emission in ngc 807 is the very low level , smooth emission extending to the west and northwest sides of the galaxy at radii of 20 to 60 ( 6 to 19 kpc ; figures [ n807 ] and [ 807 - 24 - 160 ] ) . this emission is at surface brightness levels of 0.1 @xmath42 to 0.3 @xmath42 ( 3@xmath44 to 10@xmath44 ) , and it is not accounted for in the parametric fit described above . figure [ 807 - 24 - 160 ] shows that the 160emission is also extended to the northwest over the same spatial region . similar asymmetries are found in the broadband optical and hi images and are undoubtedly caused by a gravitational interaction that has left large - scale disturbances in the outer parts of the galaxy . for example , in the northeast and southwest corners of the hi image in figure [ 807 - 24 - 160 ] there are sections of tidal arms that stretch beyond the frame to radii of 5 ( 91 kpc ) . hi column densities northwest of the galaxy nucleus peak at 8.6 ( 9.4 pc@xmath45 , including helium ) at a resolution of 14 ( 4.2 kpc ) ; this hi column density occurs 50 from the nucleus of the galaxy , and is the brightest hi emission at radii @xmath46 by a factor of two . thus , the low level asymmetries in the 24 and 160 images of ngc 807 are probably consistent with an interstellar dust component that is distributed like the atomic gas . @xcite showed that the @xmath24 morphology of ngc 2320 is well described by an @xmath2 profile out to a semimajor axis of at least 90 , which bolsters its classification as an elliptical even though it has quite a large molecular gas mass of 4 . the @xmath41 image of figure [ n2320 ] clearly shows the inner dust disk to be 20 in diameter , with somewhat enhanced reddening 10 southeast of the nucleus . the unsharp - masked image also shows a bright ring of 35 diameter . molecular gas in ngc 2320 is distributed rather like the dust in the @xmath41 image and it also shows a `` tail '' of gas to the southeast of the nucleus . in contrast , the radio continuum emission is not well resolved , with fwhm @xmath47 1.7 @xcite , and it is believed to be powered by agn activity as described in greater detail by @xcite . unlike the co distribution in ngc 2320 , the 24 emission is notably symmetric . it is well described by a @xmath2 model whose half - light ellipse has semimajor and semiminor axes 4 @xmath39 2 ( 1.6 @xmath39 0.8 kpc ; table [ fittable ] ) . the 24@xmath2 model is much more compact than the optical emission from the galaxy , though . measured values for the effective or half - light radius of this galaxy range from 13 ( @xmath48 , 2mass extended source catalog ) to 29.5 ( @xmath24 , * ? ? ? * ) to 37(@xmath49 , * ? ? ? * ) , but all are significantly larger than our fitted half - light radii at 24 . we have confirmed the discrepancy in effective radii by convolving the 2mass @xmath48 image with the 24 psf and additionally by running our model fitting software on the original 2mass @xmath48 image to recover the effective radius in the same way as was done for the 24 image . we find an effective radius of 23.4 0.07 at @xmath48 , more than five times larger than the 24 effective radius . in this respect ngc 2320 is different from the ellipticals studied by @xcite , which had very similar effective radii at optical / nir and 24 . the difference in scale sizes implies that the 24 emission from ngc 2320 is not primarily circumstellar dust around evolved stars , unless there is a strong age gradient in the stellar population such that the inner arcseconds host a larger proportion of intermediate - age stars that are relatively bright at 24 . it is possible that the 24 emission in ngc 2320 is attributable to star formation activity that is restricted to the central portions of the molecular disk . the 24 emission does not show the same `` tail '' to the southeast that is seen in the molecular gas , but these might still be self - consistent if the molecular tail " is locally gravitationally stable ( perhaps not yet settled into its equilibrium orbit ) or if the local star formation rate has a dependence on gas surface density that is steeper than linear . the co column densities 10 southeast of the nucleus are at least a factor of 3 lower than the peak in the center of the galaxy , and if the star formation rate ( traced by 24 emission ) were proportional to the square of the local molecular surface density then the 24 emission 10 southeast of the nucleus would be a factor of 10 fainter than the nuclear value . but since the pointlike radio continuum emission can not be attributed to star formation activity the current data do not necessarily favor star formation as the heating source for the 24 emission . more detailed analysis of the ionized gas and the stellar population itself would provide important circumstantial evidence about the origin of the 24 emission in this case . co observations of this lenticular galaxy have recently been published by @xcite , and figure [ n3032 ] shows the comparison between optical , mid - ir , co and radio morphology . a clearly defined dusty disk of diameter 28 is viewed at rather low inclination . the molecular disk is coincident with this dust disk , but it also has a tail stretching to the southeast , and the tail has no obvious dust counterpart . since the molecular gas is nearly exactly counterrotating with respect to the stellar rotation @xcite , it is most likely to have been accreted from another galaxy or from the intergalactic medium into its retrograde orbit , and the asymmetric tail may be the remnant of the settling process . radio continuum emission from ngc 3032 is very marginally resolved but is elongated in the same direction as the dust and stellar disks . the 24emission from the galaxy is also very marginally resolved , being well fit by an exponential disk of scale length 1.8 ( 0.19 kpc ; table [ fittable ] ) . we find a marginal detection of an off - nuclear point source that may or may not be physically related to ngc 3032 . similarly to ngc 2320 , and unlike the cases described in @xcite , the 24 emission is a poor match to the optical / nir structure of the galaxy . the 2mass @xmath48 image of ngc 3032 was analyzed in the same way as we have done for the 24images , and it was found best described by a model with 15% of the total luminosity in a compact nuclear source ( probably a bright star cluster ) and 85% in a @xmath2 spheroid with an effective semimajor axis of 87 2 . thus , again , the 24 emission is not primarily circumstellar dust heated by evolved stars . the east - west elongations of the dust disk , the radio continuum emission and the bright part of the co emission suggest that indeed star formation activity could be powering the radio and 24emission from ngc 3032 . radio and fir flux densities are also consistent with star formation ( section [ discussion ] ) , and there is other evidence for star formation activity in the optical line ratios @xcite and stellar balmer line absorption @xcite . interestingly , the young counterrotating stellar core found by @xcite has a radius of roughly 2 , similar to the scale radius of the 24emission , and this young stellar core is rotating in the same direction as the molecular gas . thus the optical data are entirely consistent with our interpretation that radio and 24 emission in ngc 3032 arise in star formation . this star formation activity is most vigorous in the inner part of the molecular disk , which could be due to a nonlinear dependence of the star formation rate on the local gas density or to the gas disk being gravitationally stable in its outer regions . ngc 3656 is the most disturbed galaxy of this sample , being a clear example of a fairly recent merger remnant with a dramatic blue ring and shells . figure [ n3656 ] shows that the molecular gas is located in a nearly edge - on disk of radius @xmath43 10 = 1.9 kpc , also clearly visible as a dark dust lane bisecting the nucleus . the structure of the dust lane is somewhat irregular , suggesting a warped or folded lane rather than the very thin , flat , relaxed disks seen in ngc 4526 and ngc 4459 ( sections [ 4459 ] and [ 4526 ] ) . the radio continuum emission is clearly elongated in the same direction as the gas / dust disk , with a deconvolved gaussian source size ( hwhm ) of 3.0 @xmath39 1.4 @xcite . the 24 emission is only modestly resolved but is also clearly elongated north - south , and is adequately fit by an exponential disk of scale length 2 0.4 = 0.39 0.08 kpc and axis ratio 0.3:1.0 ( table [ fittable ] ) . thus , the morphologies of radio continuum , 24 , and co emission are all consistent with the interpretation that star formation powers the bulk of the radio and 24 emission . the scale sizes of the radio and 24 disks are substantially smaller than the molecular disk , as is also the case for ngc 3032 . this result suggests that the local star formation rate or efficiency is higher in the inner part of the gas disk . the virgo cluster lenticular ngc 4459 clearly shows a relaxed , thin dust disk of semimajor axis 9 = 0.7 kpc ( figure [ n4459 ] ) , and the unsharp - masked hst image resolves the dust into a broad , flocculent outer annulus plus an inner ring of semimajor axis 2 . the molecular gas lies in this regularly rotating disk , as shown in the channel maps presented by @xcite . the radio continuum emission from ngc 4459 is weak and unresolved in fact , it is unusually weak , and is discussed further in section [ discussion ] . the 24 emission is very symmetric and also centrally concentrated but clearly resolved ; it is well described by the sum of two exponential disks of scale radii 2.1 ( 0.16 kpc ) and 33(2.6 kpc ) . the more compact disk has 78% of the total 24flux density . the more extended ( 33 ) 24 component in ngc 4459 is unlikely to be driven by star formation activity because its scale length is so much larger than the size of the molecular gas and dust disk . it may in fact trace circumstellar dust in an evolved stellar population as discussed by @xcite . it is suggestive , though , that the size of the more compact 24 component , 2 , is a good match to the size of the inner dust ring in the top right panel of figure [ n4459 ] . the radio continuum source is also of a similar size . thus it is possible that the compact 24component and the radio continuum trace star formation activity in the central part of the gas disk ( though we can not rule out agn activity on morphological grounds alone ) . optical spectroscopy provides abundant evidence for active star formation in ngc 4459 ; the sauron data show that the molecular disk coincides with an ionized gas disk of low [ o iii]/h@xmath30 ratio @xcite , strong balmer absorption @xcite , and a dynamically cold stellar subpopulation @xcite . if , then , 80% of the 24and all of the radio continuum in ngc 4459 trace star formation activity , this is another case in which the efficiency must be much higher in the inner part of the gas disk than in the outer part . ngc 4476 is the second of our three virgo cluster early - type galaxies with well - developed dust disks ( figure [ n4476 ] ) . the f475w image also shows numerous bright point sources embedded in the dust . as for ngc 4459 and ngc 4526 , the molecular gas is confined to this disk , which has a semimajor axis of 11 = 0.9 kpc . the bulk of the 24emission can also be attributed to this dusty disk , as an excellent model of the image is achieved from a ring with its maximum intensity at a semimajor axis of 6 ( 0.5 kpc ) and gradually decreasing intensities on the interior and exterior ( table [ fittable ] ) . thus , there is extremely good agreement between 24 morphology and co morphology . no radio continuum emission is detected from ngc 4476 , and @xcite hypothesize that the magnetic field and/or the relativistic electrons may have been stripped by interactions with the intracluster medium . circumstantial evidence for this idea comes from the fact that no atomic gas is detected either @xcite . we can not , therefore , use the radio continuum morphology to argue that the 24 emission indicates star formation activity in this case . however , galex images of ngc 4476 show significantly bluer colors at radii @xmath47 12 , becoming as blue as ( fuv - nuv ) @xmath40 1.2 mag in the central resolution element compared to ( fuv - nuv ) @xmath40 2.5 mag in the outskirts of the galaxy @xcite . in the absence of the radio continuum detection it is not obvious that the 24 emission indicates star formation activity , but the optical point sources and the galex colors strongly suggest this interpretation . ngc 4526 is the third of our virgo cluster early - type galaxies with well - developed molecular and dust disks ( figure [ n4526 ] ) . the gas / dust disk is seen at high inclination and has a sharp outer edge at a semimajor axis of 15 = 1.2 kpc . the radio continuum morphology closely matches that of the molecular gas ; the 24emission is described by a plateau or a flat - topped disk of semimajor axis 7.5 ( 0.6 kpc ) and a more extended , rounder exponential disk of scale length 28 ( 2.4 kpc ) . the plateau contains 82% of the total flux density ; given its size scale and orientation it is highly likely that this 24 component is associated with the radio continuum emission via star formation in the molecular gas . the more extended , fainter and rounder 24 component could well be attributed to circumstellar dust as in @xcite , but it only contributes 18% of the 24 flux density . again , similar to the case of ngc 4459 , the optical spectroscopy traces star formation activity and its after - effects in an ionized gas disk @xcite and a young , dynamically cold stellar disk @xcite that have similar sizes to the molecular disk . ngc 5666 was originally classified as an elliptical , but upon closer inspection , its morphological status is uncertain . color images ( e.g. figure [ n5666 ] ) clearly show the red nucleus and a blue ring of radius approximately 5 , which are also shown by @xcite ( dd03 ) . the ratio of the v image to its best - fit mge model also shows one spiral arm at radii of 15 20 , and dd03 find blue star - forming knots in the arm . the arm would tend to suggest a spiral classification but it is not obvious that the bulge + exponential disk surface brightness fit of dd03 is well constrained or is a better fit to the optical surface brightness profile than a @xmath2 law . in addition , dd03 comment that their bulge + disk decomposition has an unusually extended bulge and compact disk , with the effective radius of the bulge being larger than the scale length of the disk . the galaxy therefore does not seem a particularly close match to either a prototypical elliptical or a prototypical spiral . measurements of the stellar velocity dispersion and rotation velocity @xmath50 would give better physical insight into the structure of this galaxy . the molecular gas in ngc 5666 ( figure [ n5666 ] ) is found in an inclined disk of radius roughly 78 . radio continuum emission is distributed in an asymmetric ring , brightest in the southeast and the northwest , with a central dip . local maxima in the radio continuum emission are at radii of 3.5 . the best fit model to the 24 image is a flat - topped disk or plateau of radius 5.9= 0.9 kpc , but the outer scale length is so small that the model is essentially an inclined top hat . the observed 24peak is offset a few arcseconds to the southeast of the galaxy nucleus and it coincides with the peak of the radio continuum emission . in this case the very close matches between the size of the 24plateau , the extent of the molecular disk and the radio continuum ring ( as well as the blue ring in optical images ) strongly suggest that both the radio and 24 emission are driven by star formation activity . models in which the 24 emission comes from a point source or is distributed like the stars are strongly ruled out . the non - rotated images at 70 and 160 were fit with the isophotal analysis program _ ellipse _ in stsdas , and the resulting surface brightness profiles are shown in figures [ 70sb ] and [ 160sb ] . from these comparisons it is evident that , with the exception of ngc 807 , the targets are not resolved at 70 and 160 . ngc 807 is modestly resolved at 160 and shows an elongation in the same sense as the 24 image , as discussed already in section [ morph807 ] . the 24 morphologies in these co - rich early - type galaxies show a variety of structures including disks , rings , point sources , and very faint smooth emission . we have argued that , at least in the cases of ugc 1503 , ngc 3032 , ngc 3656 , ngc 4526 , and ngc 5666 , and possibly also in ngc 4476 , the bulk of the 24 emission must arise from dust heated by star - forming regions . in ngc 4526 , we attribute the 24 emission from the elongated , flat - top disk component ( 82% of the total flux density ) to star formation and the rest to circumstellar emission . in ngc 4459 , we have argued that 78% of the 24 emission is in a modestly - resolved component that is probably heated by star formation though it could conceivably also be powered by an active nucleus ; the remaining 22% we attribute to circumstellar dust . in ngc 807 , approximately half to 95% of the 24 emission may be related to star formation activity . in ngc 2320 the origin of the 24 emission is not clear , so the most that can be said is that studies of the stellar populations and the ionized gas distribution and line ratios would provide useful clues . our morphological work also indicated that in our co - rich early type galaxies the 24 emission usually traces the molecular gas and the silhouette dust disks more closely than it does the stellar distribution . in some cases this is fairly obvious , as the 24emission is best modeled by a ring or a structure that is flat at radii 6 to 11 . in other cases the 24 model is centrally peaked , but it has a radial scale length many times smaller than that of the stellar distribution as we have verified by analyzing near - ir @xmath48 images in the same way as the 24images . this result is an obvious contrast to the findings of @xcite that the 24 emission in their elliptical galaxies closely traced the optical / nir star light , with very similar size scales and fairly tight correlations between @xmath51 and @xmath52 . however , that circumstellar dust should also be present in all of our targets . it must simply be outshone by the star formation . as a test of this hypothesis , figure [ temifig ] compares the 24 flux densities and @xmath53 apparent magnitudes of our sample galaxies to those of @xcite . integrated @xmath53 total magnitudes are taken from the two micron all sky survey and its extended objects final release as tabulated in the nasa extragalactic database . the median 24 / 2.2 flux density ratio in the co - rich early - type galaxies is a factor of 15 higher than that in the sample of @xcite ; in other words , the 24 flux densities are 15 times larger than would be expected if the 24 emission were entirely circumstellar in origin . in figure [ temifig ] we also show the flux densities of the extended 24 components of ngc 4459 and ngc 4526 . on the basis of morphology we had previously argued that those components would be consistent with the circumstellar emission ; here we show that their flux densities also support this interpretation because they fall on the @xmath54 correlation defined by the co - poor ellipticals . radio to fir flux density ratios confirm the suggestions of star formation activity in all cases except ngc 2320 . for the computation of these ratios we follow @xcite ( yrc ) , who have used iras 60 and 100 flux densities ; the choice is made because yrc provide the most complete comparison set of fir and radio continuum flux densities for many types of galaxies . the logarithmic fir / radio ratio @xmath55 is presented in figure [ qplot ] for our sample of co - rich early type galaxies as well as for yrc s sample ( which includes all galaxies having 100 flux densities greater than 2 jy ) and the early - type galaxies of @xcite . according to the definitions of yrc , ngc 2320 is a radio excess galaxy whose radio continuum is likely powered by an agn ; this classification is consistent with its point source radio morphology . ngc 4476 and ngc 4459 are fir - excess galaxies . the remainder of the galaxies have fir / radio ratios @xmath55 that are consistent with those of star forming galaxies and that confirm our inferences based on the 24morphology . for comparison , the majority of the elliptical galaxies studied by @xcite are radio excess galaxies hosting agn emission , though some of them do also sit near the star formation fir - radio correlation . the fir - excess galaxies are rare , comprising 9 of 1809 galaxies in the sample of yrc , although they are somewhat more common in other samples of spirals @xcite . being rare , they are valuable for the insights they give into the physical processes underlying the fir / radio correlation . for example , both yrc and @xcite note that some of the fir - excess galaxies have unusually high dust temperatures as indicated by iras 60/100 flux density ratios @xmath56 . others have `` normal '' dust temperatures . yrc have argued that the `` hot dust '' fir excess galaxies may be very densely enshrouded agn or compact nuclear starbursts . @xcite have argued that a few of the hot dust fir excess galaxies are likely to be cases of recently initiated starbursts , in which the starburst began so recently that there has not yet been time for appreciable numbers of supernovae to accelerate the cosmic ray population and produce the cm - wave synchrotron emission . they have also argued that `` cool dust '' fir - excess galaxies are dominated by heating from the evolved stellar population , not star formation ( c.f . * ? ? ? all of the co - rich targets studied here fall into the `` cool dust '' category , and our fir excess galaxies ngc 4476 and ngc 4459 have iras 60/100 flux density ratios of 0.36 and 0.39 respectively . thus , of the three preceding explanations for the fir excess phenomenon , we reject the idea of highly enshrouded agn in our targets . we have also used morphology to argue that the bulk of the 24 emission does not originate from dust heated by the evolved stellar population in ngc 4459 . it is possible that recently initiated star formation could be responsible for the relatively low level of radio continuum emission in ngc 4476 and ngc 4459 ( and perhaps also in ngc 0807 and ngc 4526 , which have relatively high @xmath55 values ) . close inspection of their stellar populations could test that idea . an alternative , possibly viable explanation is that the weak radio continuum flux densities may be related to unusually weak magnetic fields . in the case of the virgo cluster members ngc 4459 , ngc 4476 , and ngc 4526 , the interactions with the intracluster medium could be responsible for stripping the plasma and/or the magnetic fields in a more advanced version of the stripping that is now evident in the virgo spirals studied by @xcite . high quality radio polarization imaging would help to answer this question , and such work would also be valuable because rather little is known about the strengths of interstellar magnetic fields in early - type galaxies . @xcite have made careful models of the mid- to far - ir emission in nearby spirals and have concluded that the fir emission ( specifically , emission at wavelengths longer than 100 ) originates in the diffuse ism , not star forming regions . if this is true , then the fir emission in spirals may be a better tracer of the total dust mass than of the total light emitted from star - forming regions . fir emission in spirals may still be associated with star formation , but as a cause rather than an effect ; the association could be through the schmidt law in the same way that molecular clouds are associated with star formation . in this case , the tightness of the radio - fir correlation is still puzzling . galaxies that are rich in cold neutral gas but are not forming stars ( such as ngc 2320 ? ) should be particularly valuable test cases for disentangling the physical processes driving these emissions , and it would be helpful to have fir images at spatial resolutions matching those of the molecular gas maps . aside from the slight extension in the 160 image of ngc 807 there is still very little information on the resolved fir emission of early - type galaxies . one notable exception is that the ground - based observations of @xcite have clearly resolved the 350 emission in at least ugc 1503 , ngc 807 , ngc 3656 , and ngc 4476 , and they show it to be elongated at the same orientation as our 24 and co images . @xcite find an empirical relation between the 24luminosity of a star - forming region or galaxy and its star formation rate : @xmath57 here @xmath58 is the monochromatic luminosity at 24 in units of erg s@xmath14 , given by @xmath59 with @xmath60 being the flux density at 24 and @xmath61 the central frequency of the 24 band . if this relation is accurate in early - type galaxies as well ( e.g. if the initial mass function is the same in both types of galaxies , among other issues ) , the star formation rates in our co - rich targets are on the order of a few tenths of a solar mass per year ( table [ sfrs ] ) . gas depletion timescales can be estimated from the total molecular gas mass ( molecular hydrogen with a correction for helium ) divided by the star formation rate . those timescales are a few gyr , with one exception . the 24 luminosity of ngc 2320 is so low compared to its total molecular mass that even if all of its 24 luminosity were powered by star formation the gas depletion timescale would be longer than the hubble time . since the molecular gas in the early - type galaxies settles into kpc - scale disks @xcite , the young stars will also be dynamically cold populations . the co - rich early - type galaxies , with the exceptions already discussed , are building disky stellar components on timescales of a few gyr . indeed , in ngc 4526 the dynamically cold stellar disk is already visible in the stellar kinematics @xcite . however , since the total molecular gas masses are only a few to a few , the young stellar populations will not make up more than a few percent of the total stellar mass . the gas depletion timescales in table [ sfrs ] are similar to the corresponding timescales in the disks of spiral galaxies . depletion timescales are , of course , very sensitive to assumptions about initial mass functions and co - to - h@xmath62 conversion factors , but estimates for spirals tend to be in the range of a few gyr @xcite and the values in table [ sfrs ] are 1 to 4 gyr in seven of nine cases . in other words , while the elliptical and lenticular galaxies have smaller molecular masses than spirals , their star formation efficiencies are similar to within factors of a few . @xcite has also pointed out that recycled matter from stellar evolution ( especially from the more massive stars ) may make the gas reservoir last a factor of 2 to 3 times longer than the simple depletion timescale estimate . thus , we can expect the molecular disks in the early - type galaxies to remain for many gyr , perhaps as long as another hubble time , unless there are significant destructive processes such as stripping , interactions with hot gas , and/or possible agn feedback . ram pressure stripping will be more intense in clusters than in the field , and tidal interactions more frequent , so the environments of our co - rich early - type galaxies are also of interest . ngc 4476 , ngc 4459 , and ngc 4526 are members of the virgo cluster and ngc 2320 is a member of the abell 569 cluster ; ngc 4476 is already known to have suffered some ram pressure stripping @xcite , but it still retains its molecular gas at least for the time being . to put this disk growth into the broader context of galaxy formation and evolution , it is important to know what ( if anything ) the molecular content of an early - type galaxy reveals about its history . however , the origins of the molecular gas in early - type galaxies are not yet known in most cases , and it is not yet clear why some early - type galaxies are rich in molecular gas while others are not . for many years there has been speculation that the molecular gas could originate from the mass loss of evolved stars ( e.g. * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . in other cases such as ngc 3032 @xcite and ngc 2768 @xcite , the clear kinematic misalignments between molecular gas and stars indicate that the molecular gas was accreted from some external source or possibly it is leftover from a major merger . it will be necessary to obtain larger numbers of molecular gas maps and better statistics on the co content of the early - type galaxies before we will understand what fraction of their molecular gas could have come from internal and external origins , or whether the co - rich and the co - poor galaxies have had systematically different formation histories . for the majority of the co - rich early - type galaxies , the close agreements between co , 24 , and radio continuum morphologies suggest that the bulk of the 24 emission should be attributed to star formation activity . in our sample , these galaxies include ugc 1503 , ngc 3032 , ngc 3656 , ngc 4459 , ngc 4526 , and ngc 5666 . the 24 emission in ngc 4476 is likely due to star formation . a portion of the 24 emission from ngc 807 may also trace star formation activity , but the origin of the 24emission in ngc 2320 is not yet clear . radio and fir flux density ratios are consistent with this interpretation , as are the increased @xmath63 flux denstiy ratios of the co - rich over the co - poor early - type galaxies . thus , one of the major implications of this work is that the co , radio , and mips data are roughly consistent with the uv results implying star formation activity in a few tens of percent of the nearby early - type galaxies . the necessary raw material is present , more or less , and the molecular gas is often being processed into stars . in the cases of ngc 3032 , ngc 3656 , and ngc 4459 , the star formation activity seems to be taking place on more compact spatial scales than the distribution of the gas itself . this situation could arise if the star formation rate is a strong ( nonlinear ) function of the local gas surface density , or if the molecular disks are only unstable to star formation in their inner portions . however , the origin of the 24 emission in the co - rich early - type galaxies is not entirely clear - cut . an extended component in ngc 807 ( detected both at 24 and at 160 ) may trace dust in the diffuse atomic ism . extended 24 components in ngc 4459 and ngc 4526 may arise from dust around the evolved stars , just as @xcite find in the co - poor early - type galaxies . likewise , though ngc 2320 is very co - rich , the mismatches between co , radio continuum and 24 morphology make it unclear how much ( if any ) star formation is occurring there . in these cases , detailed comparisons with the uv morphologies and the stellar populations would provide firmer information about the distribution of star formation activity ( or the lack of it ) within the galaxies molecular disks . this work also opens the way for more quantitative tests of theoretical and phenomenological models of the star formation process . for example , with a model of the gravitational potential ( from the stellar distribution and a mass - to - light ratio ) , it would be possible to test whether the toomre - type local gravitational instability is consistent with the locations of star formation activity , as discussed by kawata et al . the gas - rich early - type galaxies could also provide useful perspective on the workings of the kennicutt - schmidt relationship between the star formation rate and the gas surface density . if these models have truly captured some underlying physics of the star formation process they ought to work in the ellipticals and lenticulars as well as in the spirals . lmy thanks the university of oxford sub - department of astrophysics and the imperial college department of astrophysics for their hospitality . scott montgomery provided assistance in the early stages of the project . we also thank liese van zee for the wiyn images and daniel a. dale for the use of his sed template and for discussions about his results . this research has made extensive use of the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology , under contract with the national aeronautics and space administration . this work is based on observations made with the _ spitzer space telescope _ , which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory ( jpl ) , california institute of technology under nasa contract 1407 . support for this work was provided by nasa and through jpl contract 1277572 . becker , r. h. , white , r. l. , & helfand , d. j. 1995 , , 450 , 559 bendo , g. j. , joseph , r. d. , wells , m. , et al . 2002 , , 123 , 3067 bendo , g. j. , joseph , r. d. , wells , m. , et al . 2002 , , 124 , 1380 bendo , g. j. , joseph , r. d. , wells , m. , et al . 2003 , , 125 , 2361 bendo , g. j. , calzetti , d. , et al . 2007 , mnras , 380 , 1313 condon , j. j. , cotton , w. d. , greisen , e. w. , yin , q. f. , perley , r. a. , taylor , g. b. , & broderick , j. j. 1998 , aj , 115 , 1693 cretton , n. , rix , h .- w . , & de zeeuw , p. t. 2000 , , 536 , 319 crocker , a. f. , bureau , m. , young , l. m. , & combes , f. 2008 , mnras , 386 , 1811 dale , d. a. , et al . , 2007 , apj , 655 , 863 de zeeuw , p. t. , et al . 2002 , , 329 , 513 de vaucouleurs , g. , de vaucouleurs , a. , corwin jr . , h.g . , buta , r. j. , paturel , g. , & fouque , p. 1991 , third reference catalogue of bright galaxies , version 3.9 ( berlin : springer - verlag ) engelbracht , c. w. , et al . 2007 , pasp , 119 , 994 emsellem , e. , et al . 2004 , , 352 , 721 fukugita , m. , nakamura , o. , turner , e. l. , et al . 2004 , , 601 , l127 gil de paz , a. , boissier , s. , madore , b. f. , et al . 2007 , apjs , 173 , 185 goudfrooij , p. , hansen , l. , jorgensen , h. e. , & norgaard - nielsen , h. u. 1994 , a&as , 105 , 341 kuntschner , h. , emsellem , e. , bacon , r. , bureau , m. , et al . 2006 , , in press ( astro - ph/0602192 ) lees , j. f. , knapp , g. r. , rupen , m. p. , & phillips , t. g. 1991 , , 379 , 177 leeuw , l. l. , davidson , j. , dowell , c. d. , & matthews , h. e. 2008 , , 677 , 249 lucero , d. m. , & young , l. m. 2007 , aj , 134 , 2148 lucero , d. m. , young , l. m. , & van gorkom , j. h. 2005 , , 129 , 647 macchetto , f. , pastoriza , m. , caon , n. , et al . 1996 , , 120 , 463 mcdermid , r. m. , emsellem , e. , shapiro , k. l. , et al . 2006 , , 373 , 906 mcdermid , r. m. , bacon , r. , kuntschner , h. , et al . ( 2006 ) , newar , 49 , 521 mei , s. , et al . , 2007 , apj , 655 , 144 morganti , r. , de zeeuw , p. t. , osterloo , t. a. , mcdermid , r. m. , krajnovi , d. , cappellari , m. , kenn , f. , weijmans , a. , & sarzi , m. 2006 , , 371 , 157 murphy , e. j. , helou , g. , kenney , j. d. p. , armus , l. , & braun , r. 2008 , , 678 , 828 murphy , e. j. , kenney , j. d. p. , helou , g. , et al . 2008 , in the evolving ism in the milky way and nearby galaxies , " proceedings of the third spitzer conference , pasadena , 2007 ( astro - ph:0802.2281 ) okuda , t. , kohno , k. , iguchi , s. , & nakanishi , k. 2005 , apj , 620 , 673 rogers , b. , ferreras , i. , lahav , o. , et al . 2007 , mnras , 382 , 750 roussel , h. , helou , g. , beck , r. , et al . 2003 , , 593 , 733 roussel , h. , helou , g. , smith , j. d. , et al . 2006 , , 646 , 841 sage , l. j. , & welch , g. a. 2006 , , 644 , 850 sage , l. j. , welch , g. a. , & young , l. m. 2007 , , 657 , 232 temi , p. , brighenti , f. , mathews , w. g. , & bregman , j. d. 2004 , , 151 , 237 tonry , j. l. , dressler , a. , blakeslee , j. p. , et al . 2001 , , 546 , 681 wang , x. , wang , l. , pain , r. , zhou , x. , & li , z. , 2006 , apj , 645 , 488 wrobel , j. m. , & heeschen , d. s. 1988 , , 335 , 677 xilouris , e. m. , madden , s. c. , galliano , f. , et al . 2004 , , 416 , 41 young , l. m. 2002 , 124 , 788 young , l. m. 2005 , 634 , 258 young , l. m. , bureau , m. , & cappellari , m. 2008 , , 676 , 317 yun , m. s. , reddy , n. a. , & condon , j. j. 2001 apj 554 , 803 lrrrcrccccl ugc 1503 & 02 01 19.8 & + 33 19 46 & 71 ( 5 ) & e & @xmath64 & & 8 & & 19 ( 3 ) & 8 + ngc 0807 & 02 04 55.7 & + 29 59 15 & 66 ( 5 ) & e & @xmath65 & 0.97 & 12 & 175 & 14 ( 3 ) & 8 + ngc 2320 & 07 05 42.0 & + 50 34 42 & 84 ( 7 ) & e & @xmath66 & 1.05 & 13 & 350 & 49 ( 7 ) & 1 , 2 , 3 + ngc 3032 & 09 52 08.2 & + 29 14 10 & 21.2 ( 1.9 ) & s0@xmath67 & @xmath68 & 0.63 & 12 & 82 & 4.9 ( 1.0 ) & 4 , 5 + ngc 3656 & 11 23 38.4 & + 53 50 31 & 40 ( 3 ) & i0pec & @xmath69 & & 14 & 180 & 37 ( 5 ) & 8 + ngc 4459 & 12 29 00.0 & + 13 58 43 & 16.1 ( 0.4 ) & s0@xmath70 & @xmath71 & 0.97 & 25 & 174 & 1.7 ( 0.3 ) & 6 + ngc 4476 & 12 29 59.2 & + 12 20 55 & 17.6 ( 0.6 ) & s0@xmath72 & @xmath73 & 0.85 & 10 & 53 & 1.0 ( 0.1 ) & 6 + ngc 4526 & 12 34 03.0 & + 07 41 57 & 17.3 ( 1.5 ) & s0@xmath67 & @xmath65 & 0.98 & 44 & 256 & 6.3 ( 1.1 ) & 2 , 4 , 7 + ngc 5666 & 14 33 09.1 & + 10 30 37 & 31 ( 2 ) & ? & @xmath74 & 0.86 & 6 & & 4.5 ( 0.6 ) & 8 + lccccc ugc 1503 & [email protected] & 0.038 & 0.33 & 8.7 & ly07 + ngc 0807 & [email protected] & 0.056 & 0.27 & 4.8 & ly07 + ngc 2320 & [email protected] & 0.17 & 13.1 & 77 & first + ngc 3032 & [email protected] & 0.14 & 1.22 & 8.7 & first + ngc 3656 & [email protected] & 0.037 & 9.4 & 254 & ly07 + ngc 4459 & [email protected] & 0.15 & 0.86 & 5.7 & first + ngc 4476 & [email protected] & 0.17 & @xmath75 0.5 & @xmath75 3 & ly07 + ngc 4526 & [email protected] & 0.15 & 3.75 & 25 & first + ngc 5666 & [email protected] & 0.050 & 1.9 & 38 & ly07 + lrrrr ugc 1503 & 0.0482 0.0019 & 0.793 0.079 & 1.49 0.18 & 25.0 0.7 + ngc 0807 & 0.0689 0.0028 & 0.608 0.061 & 2.39 0.29 & 22.2 0.5 + ngc 2320 & 0.0220 0.0009 & 0.385 0.077 & 1.12 0.13 & 22.9 0.5 + ngc 3032 & 0.165 0.007 & 2.66 0.266 & 3.32 0.40 & 27.6 0.6 + ngc 3656 & 0.169 0.007 & 3.63 0.36 & 3.81 0.46 & 27.5 0.8 + ngc 4459 & 0.129 0.005 & 3.10 0.19 & 3.76 0.45 & 27.1 0.6 + ngc 4476 & 0.0400 0.0016 & 0.886 0.133 & 1.38 0.17 & 25.6 0.7 + ngc 4526 & 0.314 0.013 & 10.2 0.61 & 12.7 1.5 & 26.5 0.5 + ngc 5666 & 0.162 0.006 & 3.00 0.30 & 2.48 0.30 & 28.0 0.8 + lccccc ugc 1503 & 0.24 0.05 & 1.44 0.15 & 0.50 0.04 & 2.5 0.5 & 2.57 0.09 + ngc 0807 & 0.45 0.09 & 1.83 0.12 & 0.41 0.03 & 1.2 0.4 & 2.91 0.15 + ngc 2320 & & 1.60 0.16 & 0.26 0.02 & 19.3 0.7 & 1.60 0.03 + ngc 3032 & & 4.70 0.47 & 1.94 0.10 & 7.2 0.5 & 2.66 0.04 + ngc 3656 & 0.69 0.14 & 6.58 0.66 & 2.54 0.13 & 19.8 0.7 & 2.35 0.03 + ngc 4459 & & 4.82 0.48 & 1.87 0.09 & 1.8 0.2 & 3.25 0.05 + ngc 4476 & 0.28 0.06 & 1.84 0.18 & 0.66 0.05 & @xmath75 0.5 & @xmath4 3.38 + ngc 4526 & & 17.1 1.7 & 5.56 0.05 & 12.0 0.5 & 2.94 0.03 + ngc 5666 & 0.52 0.10 & 3.98 0.40 & 1.99 0.10 & 17.5 0.7 & 2.24 0.03 + lcccccl ugc 1503 & y & y & y & & y & sf ring . + ngc 0807 & y & plateau / disk : y & y & & y & some sf . + & & pt src : no & no & & & + ngc 2320 & no & no & no & & no & no sf ? + ngc 3032 & y & y & y & 1 , 2 , 3 & y & sf inner disk . + ngc 3656 & y & y & y & & y & sf inner disk . + ngc 4459 & no & 2 disk : y & y & 1,2 & y & sf inner disk . + & & 33 disk : no & no & & & + ngc 4476 & & & y & 4 , 5 & & sf ring . + ngc 4526 & y & plateau : y & y & 1 , 2 & y & sf inner disk . + & & 28 disk : no & no & & & + ngc 5666 & y & y & y & 6 & y & sf ring . + lc total flux density & 46.6 1.3 mjy + radius of maximum & 4.80.4 ( 1.65 0.14 kpc ) + outer scale length & 3.20.2 ( 1.10 0.07 kpc ) + inner scale length & 2.20.6 ( 0.8 0.2 kpc ) + axis ratio & 0.73 0.03 + position angle & 582 + plateau outer scale & 3.770.12 ( 1.21 0.04 kpc ) + plateau axis ratio & 0.423 0.002 + plateau pa & @xmath76 0.06 + + exp . disk flux density & 31.23 0.07 mjy + exp . disk scale length & 16.990.14 ( 5.44 0.04 kpc ) + exp . disk axis ratio & 0.577 0.004 + exp . disk pa & @xmath77 0.2 + + nuclear point source & 3.36 0.08 mjy + total flux density & 20 2 mjy + effective radius ( major ) & 4.060.06 ( 1.65 0.02 kpc ) + effective radius ( minor ) & 1.880.06 ( 0.77 0.2 kpc ) + pa & @xmath78 2 + exp . disk flux density & 140 10 mjy + exp . disk scale length & 1.830.04 ( 0.188 0.004 kpc ) + exp . disk axis ratio & 0.808 0.006 + exp . disk pa & 636 + + off - nuclear point source & 6 14 mjy + exp . disk flux density & 146 4 mjy + exp . disk scale length & 2.00.4 ( 0.39 0.08 kpc ) + exp . disk axis ratio & 0.30 0.05 + exp . disk pa & @xmath79 1.4 + disk 1 flux density & 100 1 mjy + disk 1 scale length & 2.080.02 ( 0.162 0.001 kpc ) + disk 1 axis ratio & 0.706 0.006 + disk 1 pa & @xmath80 0.7 + + disk 2 flux density & 29 5 mjy + disk 2 scale length & 338 ( 2.6 0.6 kpc ) + disk 2 axis ratio & 0.85 0.03 + disk 2 pa & @xmath81 2 + ring total flux density & 31.6 0.2 mjy + radius of maximum & 6.00.2 ( 0.51 0.02 kpc ) + outer scale length & 1.290.07 ( 0.110 0.006 kpc ) + inner scale length & 3.70.6 ( 0.32 0.05 kpc ) + axis ratio & 0.447 0.009 + pa & 24.50.6 + + off - nuclear point source & 5 2 mjy + plateau total flux density & 254 1 mjy + plateau radius & 7.50.1 ( 0.629 0.003 kpc ) + outer scale length & 1.91 0.06 ( 0.160 0.005 kpc ) + axis ratio & 0.20099 0.00017 + pa & @xmath82 0.14 + + exp . disk flux density & 54.0 0.6 mjy + scale length & 28.41.2 ( 2.4 0.1 kpc ) + axis ratio & 0.397 0.004 + pa & @xmath83 0.4 + total flux density & 1443 mjy + plateau radius & 5.870.12 ( 0.88 0.02 kpc ) + outer scale length & 0.50.4 ( 0.08 0.06 kpc ) + axis ratio & 0.86 0.26 + pa & @xmath84 28 + lccccr ugc 1503 & 42.57 & 0.60 & 4.3 + ngc 0807 & 42.66 & 0.69 & 2.7 + ngc 2320 & 42.37 & @xmath75 0.40 & @xmath4 17 + ngc 3032 & 42.05 & 0.21 & 3.2 + ngc 3656 & 42.61 & 0.66 & 7.7 + ngc 4459 & 41.71 & 0.083 & 2.8 + ngc 4476 & 41.27 & 0.043 & 3.2 + ngc 4526 & 42.15 & 0.22 & 4.0 + ngc 5666 & 42.37 & 0.40 & 1.5 + optical , ir , co and radio continuum morphology of ugc 1503 . optical contours are spaced by a factor of two . a @xmath41 image shows no discernible structure but the unsharp masking and model division techniques do show some faint structure . contour levels in the 24 image are 0.12 , 0.31 , 0.61 , 1.22 , 1.83 , 3.05 , 4.27 , and 4.70 mjy sr@xmath14 ( the lowest three are 4.4@xmath44 , 11@xmath44 , and 22@xmath44 ) . contour levels in the co image are @xmath85 , 0.63 , 1.27 , 1.90 , 3.12 , 4.43 , and 5.70 @xmath86 . contours in the 1.4 ghz radio continuum image are 0.09 , 0.12 , 0.15 , 0.18 , and 0.24 @xmath87 ( 2.4 , 3.1 , 3.9 , 4.7 , and 6.3@xmath44 ) . in this and subsequent figures , green circles in the lower right corners of panels indicate the resolution ( fwhm ) of their respective data . contours are colored either white or black as necessary to enhance their visibility . ] optical , ir , co and radio continuum morphology of ngc 807 . optical contours are spaced by a factor of two . the top row , middle panel is a @xmath41 image and the top row , right panel is a @xmath24 image divided by a smooth mge model constructed using the software of @xcite . contours in the 24 image are 0.12 , 0.29 , 0.58 , 1.16 , 1.74 , 2.91 , 4.07 , and 5.23 mjy sr@xmath14 ( the lowest three are 4.3@xmath44 , 10@xmath44 , and 20@xmath44 ) . contours in the co image are @xmath88 , 0.77 , 1.53 , 2.30 , 3.83 , 5.33 , and 6.88 @xmath86 . contours in the 1.4 ghz radio continuum image are @xmath89 , @xmath90 , @xmath91 , 0.1 , 0.15 , 0.2 , and 0.25 @xmath87(@xmath92 , @xmath93 , @xmath94 , 1.8 , 2.7 , 3.6 , and 4.5@xmath44 ) . ] large - scale optical , ir , and hi morphology of ngc 807 . optical contours are spaced by a factor of two . contour levels in the 24 image are the same as in figure [ n807 ] . contour levels in the 160 image are 1.14 , 2.28 , 4.56 , 6.84 , 11.4 , 16.0 , and 20.5 mjy sr@xmath14 ( the lowest three are 2.0@xmath44 , 4.1@xmath44 , and 8.2@xmath44 ) . the hi integrated intensity image has a resolution of 14 @xmath39 13 and contour levels are at 0.01 , 0.02 , 0.04 , 0.06 , 0.10 , 0.14 , and 0.18 @xmath86 , where the peak in the hi intensity is 0.20 @xmath86 = 1.2 . ] optical , ir , co and radio continuum morphology of ngc 2320 . optical contours are spaced by a factor of two . contours in the 24 image are 0.11 , 0.28 , 0.56 , 1.13 , 1.69 , 2.82 , 3.94 , and 5.08 mjy sr@xmath14 ( the lowest three are 3.9@xmath44 , 9.8@xmath44 , and 20@xmath44 ) . contours in the co image are @xmath95 , 1.46 , 2.91 , 5.82 , 8.73 , 14.5 , 20.4 , and 26.2 @xmath86 . contours in the 1.4 ghz radio continuum image are @xmath96 , 0.39 , 1.31 , 2.62 , 6.55 , and 11.8 @xmath87 ( @xmath97 , 2.3 , 7.7 , 15 , 39 , and 69@xmath44 ) . ] optical , ir , co and radio continuum morphology of ngc 3032 . optical contours are spaced by a factor of two . the unsharp - masked image is from a wfpc2 f606w image . contours in the 24 image are 0.51 , 1.01 , 2.53 , 5.06 , 10.1 , 15.2 , 25.3 , 35.4 , and 45.5 mjy sr@xmath14 ( the lowest three are 16@xmath44 , 32@xmath44 , and 81@xmath44 ) . contours in the co image are @xmath98 , 1.81 , 3.62 , 5.43 , 9.05 , 12.7 , and 16.3 @xmath86 . contours in the 1.4 ghz radio continuum image are 3.2 , 5.4 , and 7.5 times the rms noise level ( 0.14 @xmath87 ) . ] optical ( @xmath24 ) , ir , co and radio continuum morphology of ngc 3656 . optical contours are spaced by a factor of two . the unsharp - masked image is made from the @xmath24 image . contours in the 24 image are 0.57 , 1.15 , 2.87 , 5.75 , 11.5 , 17.2 , 28.7 , 40.2 , and 51.7 mjy sr@xmath14 ( the lowest two are 23@xmath44 and 26@xmath44 ) . contours in the co image are 4.05 , 8.09 , 16.2 , 24.3 , 40.5 , 56.6 , and 72.8 @xmath86 . contours in the 1.4 ghz radio continuum image are @xmath99 , 0.09 , 0.3 , 0.9 , 2.4 , and 6.0 @xmath87 ( @xmath100 , 2.4 , 8.1 , 24 , 64 , and 162@xmath44 ) . ] optical , ir , co and radio continuum morphology of ngc 4459 . optical contours are spaced by a factor of two . contours in the 24 image are 0.33 , 0.66 , 1.65 , 3.30 , 6.59 , 9.89 , 16.5 , 23.1 , and 29.7 mjy sr@xmath14 ( the lowest three are 8@xmath44 , 15@xmath44 , and 39@xmath44 ) . contours in the co image are @xmath101 , 2.14 , 4.28 , 6.42 , 10.7 , 15.0 , and 19.3 @xmath86 . contours in the 1.4 ghz radio continuum image are @xmath102 , 3 , 4 , and 5 times the rms noise level ( 0.15 @xmath87 ) . ] optical , ir , co and radio continuum morphology of ngc 4476 . optical contours are spaced by a factor of two . contours in the 24 image are 0.40 , 0.80 , 1.60 , 2.40 , 4.0 , 5.6 , and 7.2 mjy sr@xmath14 ( the lowest three are 13@xmath44 , 25@xmath44 , and 50@xmath44 ) . contours in the co image are @xmath103 , @xmath104 , 1.24 , 2.48 , 3.72 , 6.20 , 8.68 , and 11.2 @xmath86 . radio continuum emission from ngc 4476 is undetected @xcite . ] optical , ir , co and radio continuum morphology of ngc 4526 . optical contours are spaced by a factor of two . contours in the 24 image are 0.69 , 1.38 , 3.45 , 6.90 , 13.8 , 20.7 , 34.5 , 48.3 , and 62.1 mjy sr@xmath14 ( the lowest three are 7@xmath44 , 15@xmath44 , and 37@xmath44 ) . contours in the co image are @xmath105 , 3.71 , 7.42 , 11.1 , 18.6 , 26.0 , and 33.4 @xmath86 . contours in the 1.4 ghz radio continuum image are @xmath106 , 0.38 , 0.75 , 1.88 , and 3.37 @xmath87 ( @xmath107 , 2.5 , 5.0 , 12.5 , and 22@xmath44 ) . ] optical , ir , co and radio continuum morphology of ngc 5666 . optical contours are spaced by a factor of two . the top right panel is constructed by dividing the @xmath24 image with a smooth elliptical mge model . contours in the 24 image are 0.33 , 0.67 , 1.66 , 3.33 , 6.66 , 9.99 , 16.7 , 23.3 , and 30.0 mjy sr@xmath14 ( the lowest three are 12@xmath44 , 24@xmath44 , and 58@xmath44 ) . contours in the co image are @xmath108 , 1.68 , 3.35 , 5.03 , 8.38 , 11.7 , and 15.1 @xmath86 . contours in the radio continuum image are @xmath109 , 0.12 , 0.4 , 0.8 , 1.6 , and 1.8 @xmath87 ( @xmath100 , 2.4 , 8 , 16 , 32 , and 36@xmath44 ) . ] the 24 flux density and @xmath53 apparent magnitude for the co - rich early - type galaxies ( circles ) . for comparison , the sample of ellipticals studied by @xcite are shown as crosses and spirals from the sings sample are shown as squares @xcite . in addition , for ngc 4459 and ngc 4526 we show both the total 24 flux density and the more extended component by itself , with dotted lines connecting the symbols . uncertainties are comparable to or smaller than the symbol sizes . the solid line is not a fit but is instead a representative linear relationship between the 24 and @xmath53 flux density . in the generally co - poor ellipticals of @xcite , the 24 emission is thought to be primarily associated with mass loss from the evolved stars . the extended 24 components in ngc 4459 and ngc 4526 have 24/@xmath53 ratios consistent with this behavior . ] . the circles and the large arrow are the co - rich early - type galaxies studied here , and crosses are the data of @xcite . as defined by those authors , the flux ratio @xmath55 has a mean value of 2.34 for star - forming galaxies ( mostly spirals ) ; the lines at @xmath110 and @xmath111 indicate the ir excess and radio excess boundaries , respectively , at roughly @xmath112 from the mean . uncertainties are comparable to or smaller than the symbol sizes , though we have not included the effect of the distance uncertainty on the 60 luminosity . the ratio @xmath55 is , of course , independent of distance . evidently the co - rich early - type galaxies follow the same radio / fir relation as the star forming spirals . another sample of 48 elliptical galaxies from @xcite are shown in triangles and small arrows . [ qplot ] ] Abstract:
[ "many early - type galaxies have been detected at wavelengths of 24 to 160 but the emission is usually dominated by heating from an agn or from the evolved stellar population . here we present _ spitzer _ mips observations of a sample of elliptical and lenticular galaxies that are rich in cold molecular gas , and we investigate whether the mir to fir emission could be associated with star formation activity . the 24 images show a rich variety of structures , including nuclear point sources , rings , disks , and smooth extended emission . comparisons to matched - resolution co and radio continuum images suggest that the bulk of the 24 emission can be traced to star formation with some notable exceptions . the 24 luminosities of the co - rich galaxies are typically a factor of 15 larger than what would be expected from the dust associated with their evolved stars . in addition , fir / radio flux density ratios are consistent with star formation . we conclude that the star formation rates in @xmath0 elliptical and lenticular galaxies , as inferred by other authors from uv and optical data , are roughly consistent with the molecular gas abundances and that the molecular gas is usually unstable to star formation activity ." ]
17,540
17,540
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: continuous measurement of quantum systems @xcite , the study of quantum systems states under the influence of observation prolonged in time , has been a topic of considerable activity in recent years . particularly , for the measurement of an individual microscopic system that is weakly coupled to measurement apparatus , the system s state and its conditioned evolution in time , the so - called diffusive - type quantum state trajectory @xcite , have been intensively explored for applications in quantum information and quantum control . some of the active fields are quantum state estimation ( i.e. , estimating the pre - measurement state of an ensemble of identically prepared systems @xcite ) , conditional reversal of measurement @xcite , and the preparation of entangled states @xcite . the ability to continuously measure quantum systems also opens the possibility of feedback control @xcite , which has also been investigated for topics such as the stabilization of coherent oscillations @xcite and rapid state purification @xcite . this growing interest in the quantum systems under weak continuous measurement has motivated a thorough analysis of quantum trajectory statistics . of notable importance are advances in experiments , such as the measurement of superconducting qubits @xcite , which has allowed the tracking of the trajectories of the quantum state with high fidelity in a single measurement run , allowing the statistics of selected subensembles of trajectories to be explored . the authors recently developed an action principle @xcite over a doubled quantum state space , based on a path integral representation of probability distributions of quantum trajectories . the action principle , implemented by extremizing of the stochastic path integral s action , was used to investigate the optimal behaviour of the trajectories with arbitrary constraints , such as fixing the final boundary condition @xcite . the stochastic path integral and the optimum likelihood approach provide a convenient way to investigate statistical distributions and globally optimal dynamics of quantum state evolution , in addition to the stochastic master equations describing the quantum trajectories and the lindblad master equations describing their average evolution @xcite . in this paper , we continue the development of the stochastic path integral formalism @xcite , to further explore advantages of having the full joint probability distribution of quantum trajectories . this includes computing statistical averages or expectation values with the ability to condition on definite quantum states at particular times . we present several examples of the formalism including a qubit system under the influence of measurement alone , measurement with concurrent unitary dynamics , and qubit measurement with feedback control . in these examples , the statistics of qubit trajectories are computed using developed techniques for the path integral , such as multi - dimensional gaussian integrals and diagrammatic expansion theory . moreover , in an example of qubit measurement with linear feedback , we utilize a phase portrait analysis to investigate the most likely behaviour of the system dynamics , revealing a simple and practical approach for qubit state stabilization . there have been past works on continuous quantum measurements with path integrals , so we wish to discuss how our approach bears both similarities and differences to them . an early approach suggested by feynman @xcite and later independently developed by mensky @xcite is a restricted path integral : a modified version of the feynman path integral to only sum over paths that contribute to a measurement record . caves , and also barchielli @xcite , constructed similar path integrals by adding coarse - graining ( resolution ) functions describing the effect of the measurement . in these path integral approaches , one considers the distribution of the measurement records ( it can be derived from the probability amplitude , see appendix [ app - otherpathint ] ) , whereas in our approach , we formulate a path integral in quantum state space to represent a joint probability distribution of the measurement readouts as well as quantum state trajectories . wei and nazarov discussed a different approach to continuous measurements using the keldysh path integral technique @xcite . in breuer and petruccione s path integral @xcite , the notion of the sum over pure state paths in hilbert space is applied , resulting in a different type of doubled state space that does not yield an action functional . the stochastic path integral formalism and the analysis of its action are also applied in classical stochastic processes . for instance , the formalism is used in studying the dynamics and distribution of transmitted electronic charge @xcite , the neural network @xcite , and the large deviations from typical behaviours ( rare events ) @xcite . our approach is similar to the martin - siggia - rose formalism @xcite , which involves adding conjugate fields through the fourier integral form of delta functionals enforcing diffusive dynamics . notably , one can think of the quantum trajectories on a finite dimensional state space as analogous to classical random processes in configuration space of that dimension . this paper is organized as follows . in section [ sec - mainspi ] , we review the stochastic path integral formalism and its extremized action equations , for a general finite - dimensional system with a markovian setup for weak continuous measurement . in section [ sec - qubit ] , a specific measurement setup for a qubit is presented , which is used throughout this paper . in section [ sec - qnd ] , we show that , in the case without qubit hamiltonian , we can perform the full path integration directly to get the multi - time correlation functions for the preselected and postselected qubit state . in section [ sec - purbexpand ] , the diagrammatic expansion theory is presented as an alternative approximation method for computing multi - time correlation functions , with examples for qubit measurement with rabi oscillation . in section [ sec - feedback ] , qubit measurement with feedback control and its optimal dynamics are investigated using the path integral and the action principle approaches . the conclusion can be found in section [ sec - conclusion ] . a series of supplementary discussions and some detailed calculations that are not included in the main text are presented in the appendixes . we consider the distribution of quantum state trajectories for continuous quantum measurement . a quantum state trajectory , or simply a quantum trajectory , is an evolution of a quantum state in time , conditioned on a detector readout realization . this conditional state trajectory is also known as a solution of stochastic master equations , unravelling master equations in lindblad form . let us discretize the measurement readout into @xmath0 time points and denote @xmath1 as a measurement realization . each @xmath2 is a readout obtained between time @xmath3 and @xmath4 , and is assumed dependent only on a quantum state right before its measurement ( markov assumption ) . we define a series of quantum states @xmath5 , written as a @xmath6-dimensional parametrized vector @xmath7 , where the components are the expansion coefficients of the density operator @xmath8 written in some orthogonal operator basis , such as the @xmath9 generalized gell - mann matrices @xmath10 of a @xmath11-state system @xcite . for a two - state system , the matrices @xmath10 for @xmath12 are the pauli matrices , and @xmath13 is a vector in bloch sphere coordinates . the quantum state trajectory can be computed with an update equation of the form , @xmath14 $ ] , taking into account the measurement back - action from the measurement readout @xmath2 , and also considering the unitary evolution from the measured system s hamiltonian . since the distribution of the measurement readout only depends on the quantum state right before the measurement in this markovian approach , we can then write the joint probability density function ( pdf ) of all measurement outcomes and state trajectories @xmath15 given an initial state @xmath16 and a set of other constraints @xmath17 as , @xmath18 this is a time step product of @xmath19 , the conditional probability distribution for the measurement outcome @xmath2 given the system state before the measurement @xmath20 , and @xmath21)$ ] , the ( deterministic ) conditional probability distribution for the quantum state after the measurement , given the state at the previous time step and the measurement readout . the prefactor @xmath22 $ ] in eq . is a function of quantum states and readouts at any times , accounting for constraints used in selecting a sub - ensemble of the quantum trajectories , such as initial - state and final - state conditions . the benefit of having the joint pdf eq . is that it contains all the statistical information about the system s evolution under measurement , and it allows us to selectively work with sub - ensembles of quantum trajectories simply by adding constraints ( or conditions ) to the joint distribution . statistical moments can be computed from this joint pdf by integrating over its variables . for example , an expected value of an arbitrary functional @xmath23 $ ] is given by @xmath24_1^n { \mathrm{d}}[r_k]_0^{n-1 } { \cal p}_{\zeta } { \cal a}$ ] , where we define a notation for the multiple integral , @xmath25_{1}^{n } \equiv \int\!\ ! { \mathrm{d}}{{\bm q}}_{1 } \cdots { \mathrm{d}}{{\bm q}}_{n}$ ] . direct integration of these quantities using the joint pdf as in eq . , however , can be a challenging task even for a simple qubit measurement problem . as such , we are motivated to write the joint pdf in a path integral form with an action ( or exponent ) , so we can perform the integration using techniques developed in quantum theory such as a diagrammatic perturbation theory . the path integral representation of the joint pdf in eq . can be attained by writing the delta functions for the state update @xmath26)$ ] for @xmath27 to @xmath28 in the fourier integral form , i.e. , @xmath29 for each @xmath30 and each component of the vector @xmath7 , and then rewrite other terms in exponential forms . the conjugate variables for those delta functions are denoted by @xmath31 for @xmath27 to @xmath28 . we refer to ref . @xcite and its appendixes for a thorough discussion about this transformation and the construction of the path integral . as a result , the joint pdf is then given in a path integral form , @xmath32_{0}^{n-1 } \exp({\cal s}),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the integrals are over all possible paths of @xmath33 and the action @xmath34 is defined as , @xmath35 ) + \ln p(r_k | \bm{q}_k ) \bigg\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we note that @xmath36 is an additional term determined by the formation of @xmath37 in eq . , and @xmath38 is a prefactor absorbing normalization constants . for an example , we consider a sub - ensemble of trajectories that obey conditions on the initial and final states . the theoretical analysis of this kind of constraint is presented in ref . the initial state is fixed at @xmath39 and the final state is at @xmath40 . this leads to the constraint term @xmath41 in eq . and the preselected and postselected joint pdf , @xmath42 , which is written in a path integral form as , @xmath43_{-1}^{n } \exp({\cal s}_{{{\bm q}}_i , { { \bm q}}_f}),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the path integral s action is , @xmath44 ) + \ln p(r_k | \bm{q}_k ) \bigg\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we note that , in eq . and , two additional conjugate variables , @xmath45 and @xmath46 , are introduced , because we have written the delta functions in @xmath47 , one for the initial state and another for the final state , in the fourier integral form . we can investigate the path integral s largest contribution by solving for its action s extrema . taking the variation of the action eq . over all the variables and setting it to zero , we obtain a set of difference equations , [ eq - diffeqs ] @xmath48&=0,\\ \label{eq - backwardp } -\bm{p}_{k-1 } + \frac{\partial}{\partial \bm{q}_k}\big\{\bm{p}_k\cdot \bm{\mathcal{e}}[\bm{q}_k , r_k ] + \ln p(r_k | \bm{q}_k)\big\}&=0 , \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial r_k}\big\ { \bm{p}_k \cdot \bm{\mathcal{e}}[\bm{q}_k , r_k ] + \ln p(r_k | \bm{q}_k)\big\}&=0.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the first , second and third equations are from taking derivatives over the conjugate variables @xmath31 from @xmath49 to @xmath28 , over the state variables @xmath20 from @xmath50 to @xmath28 , and over the measurement readout variables @xmath2 from @xmath27 to @xmath28 , respectively . the derivative over the final state variable @xmath51 gives a trivial equation @xmath52 , whereas the derivatives of the action over @xmath45 and @xmath46 force the boundary conditions @xmath39 and @xmath40 on the solutions of eqs . . we note that , in the case of no final boundary condition on the quantum state ( i.e. , @xmath53 or @xmath54 ) , the derivative of the action over @xmath51 instead gives @xmath55 , a final value of the conjugate variable . interestingly , this extremization of the action in eqs . reproduces the lagrange multiplier method , an optimization strategy that accommodates constraints . in our case , the optimized function is the last term of eq . , @xmath56 , subject to the constraints @xmath57 $ ] for @xmath58 ( enforcing the deterministic state update ) with the lagrange multipliers @xmath59 , and the boundary constraints @xmath39 and @xmath40 with the lagrange multipliers @xmath45 and @xmath46 therefore , a solution of the difference equations eqs . is a path that optimizes the log - likelihood of a quantum trajectory , @xmath56 , subject to the indicated constraints . the optimal path can be a local maximum , a local minimum , or a saddle point in the constrained probability space . for the optimal path that represents the local maximum , we call it the most likely path or the most probable path . the optimal path , a solution of the difference equations eq . and their boundary conditions , can be approximated by taking a time - continuous limit @xmath60 , changing the difference equations to a set of ordinary differential equations , which can then be solved analytically or numerically . this approximation is applicable because its solutions , the optimal readouts and the optimal quantum paths , are smooth functions of time . in the case of the optimal paths that maximize the log - likelihood of preselected and postselected quantum trajectories ( the most likely paths between two quantum states ) , these solutions have been experimentally verified with a superconducting transmon qubit @xcite . so far , we have presented the joint pdf and the path integrals in the time - discrete form . for a more compact representation , we introduce a time - continuous version of the discrete stochastic path integral , assuming that the system is not intrinsically discrete and a well - defined diffusive limit exists . the joint pdf , for example in eq . , is written as , @xmath61 \ , \exp({\cal s } ) \overset{\delta t \rightarrow 0}{= } { \cal n}\!\ ! \int \!\!\ ! { \cal d}{{\bm p}}\ , \exp({\cal s}),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have defined a notation for functional integrals , e.g. , @xmath62 $ ] . the action in eq . is given by , @xmath63 ) + { \cal f}[{{\bm q}},r]\big\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have introduced @xmath64{\mathrm{d}}t$ ] as the time - continuous version of the state update equation @xmath65 $ ] , and defined @xmath66 $ ] as the linear - order expansion in time of the log - probability , i.e. , @xmath67+o(\delta t^2)\}$ ] . a proportionality factor of the latter is absorbed into the normalization factor @xmath38 . the time dependence of the variables in eq . and is suppressed for simplicity ( e.g. , @xmath68 ) . in the continuous version of the action , the state update equation @xmath69 $ ] can be derived from the first order expansion in @xmath70 of its discrete form @xmath65 $ ] using the exact readout probability distribution @xmath19 . as an alternative , one can consider using a stochastic master equation of the quantum state , where an ideal white noise @xmath71 is introduced with its single gaussian probability distribution . the latter substitution is valid in an idealized noise limit , which we discuss in more detail in section [ subsec - nonqnd ] ( where it stochastic equations are chosen in the diagrammatic perturbation approach ) and in appendix [ app - whitenoise ] . the choice of the stochastic state equations needs to be consistent with the readout ( or noise ) probability distribution used in obtaining the functional @xmath66 $ ] in eq . . a careful analysis is needed when considering the extremization of the action as described in eqs . , which , in the continuum limit , changes to a set of ordinary differential equations . we note that one can derive this same set of differential equations directly from extremizing the continuous - version action in eq . , if the state update equation @xmath69 $ ] is obtained from the first order expansion in @xmath70 of its discrete form ( this approach to the derivation is presented in ref . @xcite ) . for the action constructed using the it stochastic equations , its extremization does not give a correct set of differential equations describing the optimal paths . however , a stochastic path integral formulated using the it equations is more advantageous when computing functional integrals , which is presented in section [ sec - purbexpand ] . so far we have presented the formalism in the general context , the quantum measurement with measurement readouts @xmath72 and corresponding quantum states @xmath73 . in order to show examples and demonstrate how to compute interesting quantities using the path integral formalism , we choose a particular theoretical model , a qubit continuously measured by an apparatus assuming a weakly responding ( or coupled ) detector . this theoretical setup has long been a subject of interest in theories and experiments . some of the physical realizations of this system available with current technology are as follows : a single electron in a double quantum dot capacitively coupled to a quantum point contact detector @xcite , a superconducting qubit dispersively coupled to a microwave waveguide cavity @xcite , and quantum optics experiments such as a two - level atom monitored with homodyne optical measurement @xcite . in most of these experimental setups , one can characterize the qubit evolution as governed by the measurement back - action , the qubit unitary evolution , and extra dephasing due to loss of information or added noise . we write a time - discrete change for a qubit density matrix @xmath8 as @xmath74 $ ] , where we define a measurement operation @xmath75 = { { \hat { m}}}_{r_k } \rho { { \hat { m}}}_{r_k}^{\dagger}/{\text{tr}({{\hat { m}}}_{r_k } \rho { { \hat { m}}}_{r_k}^{\dagger})}$ ] , a unitary operation @xmath76 = e^{-i { { \hat { h } } } \delta t } \rho e^{i { { \hat { h } } } \delta t}$ ] , and an extra dephasing operation @xmath77 $ ] ( we set @xmath78 ) . the measurement back - action on a qubit state , considering the diffusive measurement as in refs . @xcite , is described by a measurement operator @xmath79 $ ] , where @xmath80 is a characteristic measurement time taken to separate the two gaussian distributions by two standard deviations . the measurement readout distribution is computed from the trace of the measurement operator and the qubit state , @xmath81 with the bloch sphere coordinates of the qubit state given by @xmath82 . we denote a qubit hamiltonian by @xmath83 characterizing the unitary evolution during the measurement , and we define the dephasing operation @xmath77 $ ] accounting for additional dephasing on the system , such as detection inefficiency and dephasing due to the environment . we model the dephasing operation as an extra dephasing rate @xmath84 on the off - diagonal elements of the qubit density matrix @xmath8 . by expanding the state update equation @xmath74 $ ] to first order in @xmath70 , and taking a continuum limit @xmath60 , we obtain a set of differential equations , [ eq - contstate ] @xmath85 which turns out to be analogous to the stochastic master equation in stratonovich interpretation as mentioned in ref . @xcite . using the state update equations in eqs . and the readout distribution in eq . , we have the qubit action in continuous form ( as in eq . ) , @xmath86 where we have approximated the logarithm of the readout distribution as @xmath87 , omitting the second term and its higher order expansion because they can be absorbed into the prefactor @xmath38 . we note that the extremization of this action and its most likely paths with fixed initial and final states are presented in more detail in ref . @xcite . in the remainder of this paper , we will focus on applying the path integral formalism to this particular qubit measurement system , though in different regimes of the hamiltonian parameters . for example , in the next section , we study the `` plain '' qubit measurement where we assume that there is no qubit hamiltonian , i.e. , @xmath88 , and the qubit s evolution comes only from the measurement and the dephasing mechanism . in this section , we present examples as to how we can use the path integral and its optimal path to compute statistical moments of the measured qubit trajectories . as it turns out , analytic solutions are possible for the case of quantum non - demolition measurement ( @xmath89 , where the system hamiltonian commutes with total system - detector hamiltonian ) with a constraint on the initial and final states of the quantum trajectories . in this case , the path integral can be written only in the @xmath90-coordinate , i.e. , @xmath91 , because the evolution of @xmath90 is independent of the other two coordinates , @xmath92 and @xmath93 . the @xmath92 and @xmath93 degrees of freedom can be found directly from @xmath94 and @xmath90 , so they will be dropped from the discussion until section [ sec - purbexpand ] . in the following subsections , we consider the plain measurement case when @xmath88 for simplicity . we show how to compute the path integral using the preselected and postselected joint pdf , @xmath95 . we first integrate this joint pdf over all intermediate variables to get the probability density function @xmath96 of arriving at the final state @xmath97 after time @xmath98 , given the initial state @xmath99 . then , we show how to generalize the integration procedures to compute statistical quantities such as averages , variances , and correlation functions of the qubit trajectories in this simplified case . we note here that even though we present the derivation in the plain measurement case , the result should still be valid for the case when @xmath100 . in the latter case , the evolution of the @xmath92 and @xmath93 coordinates of the qubit will be deterministically oscillating with the frequency @xmath101 , without affecting the evolution of the @xmath90 coordinate . in order to compute the probability distribution of the final qubit state given the initial state separated by time @xmath98 , we start with the joint pdf @xmath102 of the qubit trajectories @xmath103 and measurement outcomes @xmath104 with fixed boundary states , and then integrate over all variables except the final state @xmath97 , @xmath105_0^{n}{\mathrm{d}}[r_k]_0^{n-1 } { \cal p}_{z_i , z_f},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , as before , we have defined the multi - variable integral , e.g. , @xmath106_{0}^{n } = \int\!\ ! { \mathrm{d}}z_{0 } \cdots { \mathrm{d}}z_{n}$ ] . from the discussion in section [ sec - mainspi ] , the joint pdf is given by a product over the sliced time variables , @xmath107 . the term describing the state update equation is a delta function , @xmath108 with its argument derived from the @xmath90-coordinate of the density matrix equation @xmath109 $ ] , whereas , the probability distribution for the readout eq . is expressed in this form , @xmath110 neglecting higher orders in @xmath70 . substituting these two expressions , eqs . and , into the joint pdf , we get @xmath111 where we have used @xmath112 to represent the delta function in eq . . we then integrate out the measurement readouts by transforming the delta function of @xmath90 into a delta function in the readout variable , @xmath113 , using the transformation relation @xmath114 = \sum_i \delta[y - y_i]/|\partial_y f(y)|_{y_i = f^{-1}(x)}$ ] , where the sum extends over all solutions of @xmath115 . after integrating over the measurement readout and also over the boundary state @xmath116 , and @xmath117 , the joint pdf is transformed to a new joint pdf , a function of only the intermediate @xmath90-variables , @xmath118 where the action @xmath34 is , @xmath119 we note that we have simplified the above equation by defining a new variable @xmath120 to write the joint pdf in a compact form . this joint pdf of the @xmath90-variable is one of the main results shown in this paper . it is also important to point out that since we have already integrated over the boundary state variable @xmath116 and @xmath117 , the delta functions for the boundary states have applied to the states @xmath121 and @xmath122 in eqs . and . the next step is to perform the integration over the intermediate variables @xmath123 for @xmath124 . these integrals can be done easily by expanding @xmath123 around the optimal solution denoted by @xmath125 . we substitute @xmath126 for all @xmath30 s in the action , and perform integration by parts with the vanishing boundaries , @xmath127 . this substitution exactly simplifies to @xmath128 = { \cal s}[{\bar u } ] - \frac{\tau_m}{2 \delta t } \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(\eta_{k+1}-\eta_k)^2 $ ] ( see appendix [ app - actionpure ] for more detail ) . we then change the integral measures to @xmath129 for @xmath130 and write the probability distribution in eq . in terms of @xmath131-variables , @xmath132)}{1-z_{f}^2 } \\ & \times \exp\left\{- \frac { \tau_m}{2 \delta t}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(\eta_{k+1}-\eta_k)^2\right\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the optimal path @xmath125 is a solution of the extremization of the action , which gives @xmath133 . the solution is @xmath134 with the two constants of integration @xmath135 and @xmath136 . the optimal solution ( the most likely path ) is given by , @xmath137 where we wrote @xmath138 . we note that in the time - continuum limit , this extremization is equivalent to the vanishing functional derivative of the action , @xmath139/\delta u(t ) = \tau_m \ddot{u } = 0 $ ] , which is similar to the euler - lagrange equation for the classical trajectory of a free particle in the @xmath140 coordinate transformation . the integrals in eq . , with the probability distribution in @xmath131-variable eq . , is now in this form , @xmath141_1^{n-1 } p ( \ { \eta_k \}_1^{n-1 } , z_f | z_i).\end{aligned}\ ] ] fortunately , they are gaussian integrals in multiple dimensions which can be calculated from the matrix integral , @xmath142 , where , in our case , @xmath143_1^{n-1}= \int \!\ ! { \mathrm{d}}\eta_1\cdots { \mathrm{d}}\eta_{n-1}$ ] , and the matrix @xmath144 and the vector @xmath145 are given by , @xmath146 noting that @xmath147 . after substituting the optimal solution @xmath125 into @xmath148 $ ] and performing the integrals over @xmath149 in eq . , we obtain the distribution of the final state fixing the initial state and the duration of time @xmath150 , @xmath151 where we have defined @xmath152 as the optimal measurement readout . this solution is exactly the same as what we would get from the change of variables of the probability distribution , @xmath153 , where @xmath154 is a time - average measurement readout . the derivation of the latter distribution is presented in the methods section of ref . @xcite . we have derived the probability distribution for the measured qubit given the fixed initial and final states , as shown in eq . and . in this subsection , we consider computing the qubit trajectory s statistical quantities that can be written in this expectation form , @xmath155_1^{n-1}{\cal a}\,\ , \frac{p ( \ { z_k \}_1^{n-1},z_f | z_i)}{p(z_f|z_i)},\\ = & \frac{\sqrt{\text{det}{\bm m}}}{(2 \pi)^{\frac{n-1}{2 } } } \int { \rm d}[\eta_k]_1^{n-1}{\cal a}\,\ , e^{-\frac{1}{2}{\bm \eta}^t\cdot { \bm m } \cdot { \bm \eta}},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath156 is an arbitrary functional of @xmath157 at any time @xmath158 for @xmath159 and the matrix @xmath144 is the same as defined in eq . . note that we have used the notation @xmath160 for a statistical average conditioned on fixed initial and final states , @xmath99 and @xmath97 . since the probability distribution in the @xmath131-variables is gaussian , it is preferable to write @xmath90 in terms of @xmath131 , replacing @xmath90 with @xmath161 , and then perform the integration . for example , a conditional average of @xmath157 at time @xmath158 is given by , @xmath162 expanding to second order in @xmath131 , where the primes indicate derivatives over the @xmath140-variable . in the second line , we still use the bracket @xmath160 for the conditional average of the variable @xmath131 , even if its boundary values are shifted to @xmath163 . the expectation values in terms of @xmath131 can be computed using the definition of moments in the second line of eq . . because it is a multi - dimensional gaussian integral , we find the result from wick s theorem , @xmath164 where the left hand side is an expectation value of even numbers of @xmath131 at times @xmath165 , and the right hand side is a product of @xmath166 elements of the inverse matrix @xmath167 , summing over all possible pairings between the @xmath131 s on the left side . any other statistical averages with odd numbers of @xmath131 will vanish . as an example , pairing four @xmath131-variables , @xmath168 , yields the sum , @xmath169 . standard deviation ) of the measured qubit trajectories . the preselected state ( initial state ) and the postselected state ( final state ) are @xmath170 and @xmath171 , respectively . the total time is @xmath172 . the numerical data , plotted as gray dots , are analyzed from @xmath173 trajectories computed with time steps of the size @xmath174 , zero qubit hamiltonian , and the final selection tolerance @xmath175 . the numerical data shows excellent agreement with the theoretical solutions . the three fluctuating curves are randomly chosen individual trajectories . the inset shows the average ( dashed green ) and the most likely path ( magenta ) on a bloch sphere plotted in the @xmath92-@xmath90 plane.,width=321 ] the elements of the inverse matrix @xmath167 are of a simple form , @xmath176 for @xmath177 ( the full matrix is presented in appendix [ app - invmatrix ] ) . knowing these matrix elements , we can then compute any expectation values of the type shown in eq . , such as a two - time correlation , @xmath178 for @xmath179 , and statistical moments of even orders of @xmath131 , @xmath180 where we have used the discrete time notation @xmath181 and @xmath182 , and the double factorial prefactor @xmath183 for a positive integer @xmath184 . this double factorial comes from the number of ways of pairing @xmath185 identical variables . substituting these quantities into the expectation value eq . , we then obtain the preselected and postselected average of @xmath157 , @xmath186 keeping terms up to first order of @xmath187 , which is equivalent to second order of @xmath131 because the conditional average of the second order of @xmath131 scales as @xmath187 , i.e. , @xmath188 . this solution eq . is justified in a weak - coupling limit ( @xmath189 ) , however , the full solution to all orders can be computed and is presented in appendix [ app - fullqnd ] . using the same approximation , we can also compute another interesting quantity , the variance , keeping terms up to first order of @xmath187 , @xmath190 where its full solution to all orders in @xmath187 is also presented in appendix [ app - fullqnd ] . finally , we compute a two - time correlation in @xmath90-coordinate , keeping up to first order in @xmath187 , @xmath191 for @xmath192 , which decreases linearly in @xmath3 for a fixed @xmath158 . we show in figure [ fig - qnd ] , the average @xmath193 , its variance , and the optimal path ( the most likely path ) @xmath194 , for the preselected and postselected trajectories , compared with data from a numerical simulation using the monte carlo method ( see appendix [ app - numer ] for more detail ) . we generate @xmath173 trajectories with a postselection time @xmath172 , showing an excellent agreement with the analytical solutions . we have shown in the previous section that the preselected and postselected moments ( or expected values ) for quantum trajectory variables , in the plain measurement case , can be computed by expanding the path integral around its optimal path . since the action is gaussian , however , the path integral approach can be useful in other cases as well , such as to compute the moments and expectation values of qubit trajectories when there is no final state condition ( state postselection ) , or with non - zero qubit hamiltonian . in this section , we present an alternative method using a diagrammatic perturbation expansion of the action , similar to how feynman diagrams are used in computing path integrals in quantum field theory . in the following , we start with a brief introduction to the perturbation method ( a standard method used in quantum field theory ) and show how one can compute expectation values of system variables from moment generating functionals . we will then go on to the examples , for the case of qubit trajectories with non - zero hamiltonian and no state postselection . we note that even though most of the derivations are shown in time - continuous form for simplicity , the most straightforward derivations are in time - discretized version , and some of these are shown in appendixes [ app - sourceterm ] and [ app - heaviside ] . let us suppose that a quantity of interest is an expectation value given in a path integral form , @xmath195 where the quantity @xmath156 is a functional of a system variable @xmath196 , the integral s action @xmath34 is a functional of the system variable @xmath196 and its conjugate variable @xmath197 , and @xmath38 is a constant normalized factor . although we are writing @xmath196 and @xmath197 as one - dimensional variables here , a generalization to arbitrary dimensional vectors is straightforward . to compute the integral above , we write the action as a sum of two parts , @xmath198 , one being terms in the action that have bilinear forms , ( e.g. , @xmath199 ) , which we call the _ free action _ , @xmath200 and call the rest of terms in the action the _ interaction action _ @xmath201 . we then define a free generating functional @xmath202 $ ] , a path integral of the free action adding extra source terms with functions @xmath203 and @xmath204 , @xmath205 = & \,\,{\cal n}\!\!\int\!\ ! \mathcal{d } { x}\mathcal{d } { \tilde{x}}e^{{\cal s}_f + \int\!\ ! { \mathrm{d}}t { \tilde{x}}(t ) { \tilde{j}}(t ) + \int \!\!{\mathrm{d}}t { j}(t ) { x}(t ) } \\ = & \,\,\exp\left\{\int \!\!{\mathrm{d}}t { \mathrm{d}}t ' { j}(t ) { g}(t , t'){\tilde{j}}(t ' ) \right\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath206 is an inverse of @xmath207 in eq . satisfying @xmath208 , and we assume that the gaussian integrals in the first line produce a factor @xmath209 that leaves no prefactor in the second line . note that these integrals converge when @xmath197 is purely imaginary . moreover , if the bilinear terms are instead quadratic terms ( e.g. , @xmath210 ) , the free action will be of the form @xmath211 , and there will be only one source term @xmath212 leading to a different generating functional @xmath213 = \exp\left\{\frac{1}{2}\int\!\!{\mathrm{d}}t{\mathrm{d}}t ' { j}(t ) g(t , t ' ) { j}(t')\right\}$ ] . the generating functional eq . is then used to compute a _ free moment _ defined as @xmath214 . the free moment of the variable @xmath215 ( or @xmath216 ) at time @xmath217 is simply a functional derivative of the generating functional over the variable @xmath218 ( or @xmath219 ) , taking both variables @xmath220 and @xmath204 to be zero at the end . by looking at the second line of eq . ( [ eq - genfunz ] ) , one can see that the simplest non - vanishing free moment is a two - point correlation function @xmath221\big|_{{j}= { \tilde{j}}= 0 } = g(t , t')$ ] . generalizing this to moments of multiple time points , we get @xmath222\bigg|_{{j}={\tilde{j}}=0},\\ { \nonumber}=&\sum_{\substack{\text{all pairings between}\\ \text{variables $ { \tilde x}$ and $ x$ } } } g(t_{j_{k_1 } } , t_{j_{k_2}})\ , \cdots \,g(t_{j_{k_{2m-1 } } } , t_{j_{k_{2m}}}),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the summation is for all possible pairings between the variables @xmath196 s and their conjugate @xmath197 s . the number of propagators in the summation on the right is equal to the number of pairs presented in the expectation bracket on the left . from this , one can see that if there is at least one unpaired variable , the moment will vanish . using these definitions of the free moments , one can then compute a path integral as in eq . where @xmath198 and the arbitrary functional @xmath156 is a function of the physical variable @xmath196 , @xmath223 \rangle \equiv & \,\,{\cal n}\!\ ! \int \!\!{\cal d}{x}{\cal d}{\tilde{x}}e^{{\cal s}_f+{\cal s}_i[{x},{\tilde{x}}]}{\cal a}[{x}],\\ { \nonumber}=&{\cal a}\left[\frac{\hat \delta}{\delta { j}}\right]e^{{\cal s}_i[\frac{\hat\delta}{\delta { j}},\frac{\hat\delta}{\delta { \tilde{j}}}]}{\cal z}_f[{j},{\tilde{j}}]\bigg|_{{j}={\tilde{j}}=0},\\ = & \langle { \cal a}[{x}]e^{{\cal s}_i[{x},{\tilde{x}}]}\rangle_f , \label{eq - expa}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where in the second line we wrote the interaction action @xmath201 and the arbitrary functional @xmath156 as operators acting on the free generating functional @xmath224 $ ] . the perturbation expansion refers to the series expansion of the term @xmath225\}$ ] in eq . . in some cases , infinite series can be summed over , giving an exact analytic result , although in many others , an approximation is needed in order to truncate the series . an approximation can be made when there is a small parameter appearing in any ( or all ) of the terms in the interaction action @xmath201 , where the expansion is straightforward , keeping terms up to any desired order of the small parameter . another type of approximation , which we present here in more detail , is similar to a semiclassical expansion in quantum mechanics , keeping terms up to any order of a small parameter @xmath226 that appears as an inverse in front of the action , for example , @xmath227 \right\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we explicitly write the the free action in a bilinear form . to compute an expectation value of a functional @xmath156 using this action , one needs to expand the exponential of the interaction action and then evaluate the free moments in terms of the propagators . the order of expansion is controlled by the parameter @xmath226 . there is a factor of @xmath228 for every single term in the expansion of @xmath201 , and a factor of @xmath226 for every propagator that emerges . this is the basic idea behind the loop expansion in quantum theory , where @xmath226 plays the role of the @xmath229 in the feynman path integral . we will discuss more about the loop expansion in section [ sec - smallnoiseapprox ] . this loop expansion based on the small parameter @xmath226 , in our quantum measurement case , can be considered as a small noise expansion around a saddle point solution ( a solution that extremizes the action ) . moreover , as in the feynman path integral , under the approximation of the small parameter @xmath226 , a saddle point approximation can also be applied to estimate a path integral , using an expansion of the action around the saddle point solution . for our stochastic path integral , the saddle point approximation gives an estimation of total probability density for the joint probability distribution that the path integral represents . now we can apply the perturbation approach to our quantum measurement problem . we use the joint probability density function introduced in section [ sec - mainspi ] in its generalized form @xmath230 , a joint pdf of the measurement outcomes and the quantum states given an arbitrary set of constraints @xmath17 . statistical averages or expectation values using the joint pdf are then given in this form , @xmath231{\mathrm{d}}[r_k ] { \cal p}_{\zeta}\ , { \cal a},\\ \overset{\delta t \rightarrow 0}{\approx}&{\cal n}\!\!\!\int\!\!\!{\cal d}{\bm q}{\cal d } r { \cal d}{\bm p } \,\exp({\cal s}){\cal a},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , in the second line , we have taken the time - continuous limit and written the joint pdf in the path integral form as @xmath232 , noting that the time - continuous action is given by eq . . in the following examples , we present the perturbative expansion approach in computing the statistical moments of qubit trajectories . we focus on the case when the qubit hamiltonian does not commute with the measurement operators ( @xmath233 ) and without a final state constraint . the theoretical setup for the qubit with rabi oscillation is analogous to the one used in ref . @xcite , where the qubit hamiltonian is @xmath234 . here we can calculate important quantities such as average trajectories and correlation functions , for the case when there is only an initial state fixed and not the final state . for simplicity of the diagrammatic expansions , we make a white noise approximation and variable transformations to the qubit system . | cm | > m3.8cm| > m2.5 cm | type & labels of vertices & full forms & diagrams + type 1 ( initial ) & @xmath235 & @xmath236 & ( b2 ) ; ( bp ) ; ( b2 ) ( bp ) ; ( bp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; + type 2 & @xmath237 , @xmath238 , @xmath239 , @xmath240 , @xmath241 , @xmath242 & @xmath243 & ( b2 ) ; ( bp ) ; ( bpp ) ; ( c0 ) ; ( c1 ) ; ( c2 ) ; ( b2 ) ( bp ) ; ( bp)(bpp ) ; ( bp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; ( bp ) sin ( c1 ) ; ( bp ) sin ( c2 ) ; + type 3 & @xmath244 , @xmath245 , @xmath246 & @xmath247 & ( b2 ) ; ( bp ) ; ( bpp ) ; ( b2 ) ( bp ) ; ( bp)(bpp ) ; ( bp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; + we make an idealized white noise limit on the qubit measurement . the variance of the measurement readout distribution @xmath248 is assumed to be very broad , which in this case means @xmath249 , justifying an approximation of the two gaussian distribution in eq . to a single gaussian distribution , @xmath250 ( see appendix [ app - whitenoise ] for more detail ) . the measurement readout is then approximated to be its mean plus a noise , @xmath251 , where @xmath71 is the gaussian noise with variance @xmath252 , independent of the qubit state @xmath90 . because the nature of this noise is highly fluctuating , in the derivation of the state update equations , we need to keep an expansion up to a second order in @xmath70 , replacing @xmath253 @xcite . this leads to the it stochastic differential equations @xcite , [ eq - itoform ] @xmath254 where @xmath255 are bloch sphere coordinates for the qubit and a dephasing rate @xmath256 is now a total dephasing rate @xmath257 . the white noise @xmath71 has a gaussian probability distribution @xmath258 . before substituting the state update above into the action of the path integral , we can make changes in the variables of the system in order to simplify the later perturbation process . this is to avoid infinite series related to the linear terms in eqs . . we define a new set of variables @xmath259 where @xmath260 and @xmath261 is a matrix that diagonalizes the linear terms of eqs . , @xmath262 the eigenvalues are @xmath263 , @xmath264 and @xmath265 , where we define @xmath266 . the diagonalizing matrix @xmath261 and the transformation of the system variables @xmath255 are described in the matrix equation , @xmath267 which gives the following transformation : @xmath268 , @xmath269 , and @xmath270 , and the inverse transformation : @xmath271 , @xmath272 , and @xmath273 . the stochastic differential equations with this new set of variables are , [ eq - transformsde ] @xmath274 where we have defined @xmath275 and @xmath276 , @xmath277 , @xmath278 . now we are ready to construct the action of the path integral , substituting the update equations and the log - likelihood function @xmath279 = - \frac{1}{2}\xi^2 $ ] into the action eq . . we write the action in two separated terms , @xmath198 , where [ eq - actions ] @xmath280 are the free and interaction actions , respectively . we note that the additional term @xmath281 is not merely a time - continuous form of the first term in eq . ( we only consider the initial condition ) . this is because the actual initial condition term @xmath282 can be removed simply by integrating over the initial variable @xmath16 , forcing the condition @xmath283 to the variables at time @xmath284 . in place of the initial term , when we write the free action eq . in this form , @xmath285 , there will be leftover terms which contribute to the term @xmath281 , resulting in , @xmath286 this can be easily shown with a discretized version of the path integral , which is presented in more detail in appendix [ app - sourceterm ] . we note also that , in the rest of the paper , the time integral is always from @xmath287 to @xmath288 , unless stated otherwise . the propagators ( or green s functions ) are computed from the inverse green s functions , which in this particular case are @xmath289 , where @xmath290 ( or @xmath291 ) for the first three terms in eq . , and @xmath292 for the noise term . with an identity relation , @xmath293 , the propagators ( green s functions , or two - point correlation functions ) are given by , [ eq - propagators ] @xmath294 where @xmath295 for the first three lines . it is important to note that @xmath296 is a left continuous heaviside step function , i.e. , @xmath297 and @xmath298 , causing the two - point correlation functions for @xmath291 to vanish when @xmath299 . this is a result of the it interpretation we chose in writing the state update equation in eq . . this can also be verified with the discretized version of the path integral and is presented in appendix [ app - heaviside ] . to compute quantities such as an expectation value @xmath300 where @xmath156 is an arbitrary function written in the form of eq . , one needs to expand the exponential @xmath301 in a power series of @xmath201 , and looks for terms that contribute to its result . fortunately , from the two - point correlation functions eq . , we know that system variables @xmath291 can only connect with the their conjugate variables at earlier times , e.g. , @xmath302 can only connect with @xmath303 if @xmath304 . knowing this helps predict which terms will contribute to the sum of the expansion . for example , to show that @xmath305 , we look at terms in the interaction action eq . and see that all of them contain exactly one conjugate variable in each . looking at the propagators in eqs . , we know that it is impossible for any higher order terms in the expansion of @xmath301 to have all conjugate variables matched with system variables at their later times . this is because every time we want to find terms with system variables at later times , there will be at least one more unmatched conjugate variable appearing . therefore , there are no other contributions apart from 1 , resulting in @xmath306 . in order to make the calculation of moments @xmath307 more systematic , we develop diagrammatic rules to ease the process of keeping track of the perturbative expansion . each term in the expansion of @xmath301 is a combination of 12 additive terms shown in the interaction action eq . , with repeated appearance also possible . the 12 interaction terms ( _ interaction vertices _ ) are shown in table [ tb - vertices ] with their labeling names and examples of their full integral forms , where we use the latter to characterize the vertices into three types shown as the three rows . at the end , all combinations of the interaction vertices ( all additive terms in the expansion of @xmath301 ) are then multiplied with the function of interest @xmath156 before taking the free expectation @xmath308 . the functional @xmath156 is a function of system variables and noise variables ( i.e. , @xmath309 ) at all times . these variables are called _ ending _ vertices . let us use the word _ combination _ for an individual term combining interaction vertices ( from additive terms in the expansion @xmath301 ) and the ending vertices ( from the function @xmath156 ) . one can determine which combinations are non - vanishing and compute their values by following these diagrammatic rules : * a non - vanishing combination of vertices should contain equal number of each of the system variables ( @xmath291 ) and their conjugates ( @xmath310 ) , and there should be even number of the noise variables ( @xmath71 ) . * the system variable can only be connected to its conjugate at earlier time , while the noise variable @xmath71 connects to another noise variable at the same time . the connections are presented as ` edges ' , or lines joining vertices . the number of edges for each vertex is equal to the number of variables it contains ( graphical representations are shown in table [ tb - vertices ] , in the column of ` diagrams ' ) . a non - vanishing combination can have any number of vertices , but edges have to all be connected . * a non - vanishing combination is presented by connected diagrams with the ending vertices ( variables with their time arguments being in the range of @xmath311 $ ] ) on the most left and their time arguments clearly stated . the time ordering decreases from left to right , with variables at the same time lining up in the same vertical line , and the vertices with initial conditions ( @xmath287 ) on the most right . * a result of the free expectation value ( @xmath312 ) for each combination is computed by taking into account the constants ( i.e. , @xmath313 ) and integrals attached to each of the interaction vertices , the propagators ( the green s function ) , and the numbers of possible ways to connect diagrams . from the point of view of graphical diagrams , edges represent propagators , and points common to more than one edge correspond to integrals over time . moreover , if there are @xmath166 repeated vertices in a combination , it needs to be multiplied by a factor @xmath314 ( resulting from coefficients in the expansion of @xmath301 ) . however , these factors usually cancel with the number of possible ways to connect the repeated vertices . ) ( a ) an ending vertex connects with an initial vertex ( @xmath315 ) . ( b ) two ending vertices connect with two interaction vertices ( @xmath316 and @xmath317 ) . ( c ) two ending vertices connect with six interaction vertices ( from left - right , top - bottom order : @xmath318 , @xmath317 , @xmath317 , @xmath319 , @xmath320 and @xmath320 ) . the unequal length of horizontal edges following the ending vertices @xmath321 and @xmath322 indicate that @xmath323.,width=219 ] in figure [ fig - exdiagram ] , we show examples of non - vanishing diagrams showing connections of one and two ending vertices . for each of the diagrams , we can determine its contribution by explicitly writing out its full form and computing its integrals . in the following subsections , we present some of the calculations using these diagrams and rules to estimate statistical averages of the qubit trajectories . we note that it is also possible to construct different diagrammatic rules based on different formations of the path integrals . for example , one can perform integrals over the readout noise ( e.g. , the noise @xmath71 ) , transforming the action in eq . and to a new action that contains only the system variables @xmath324 . in this case , the diagrams will be completely different from the one we presented above , but still giving exactly the same results for the statistical quantities related to the system variables . here , we choose to present the diagrammatic rules with explicit noise variables because of the ability to compute correlation functions between the noise and the system states , as shown in section [ sec - noisesyscorr ] . the diagrammatic rules help in determining non - vanishing terms , but we need a systematic approach to keep track of the order of expansion , especially when there are infinitely many ways to construct diagrams . we consider the small noise approximation around the saddle point solution mentioned in section [ sec - briefintro ] . to obtain the action of the form in eq . , we introduce a small parameter denoted by @xmath226 to the noise term of eqs . , controlling the noise variance in the qubit dynamics , leading to a modified action , @xmath325 leaving all terms in the interaction action intact . we then rescale the conjugate variables by replacing @xmath326 , @xmath327 and @xmath328 ( as well as changing variables in the source term , e.g. , @xmath329 ) , noting that the rescaling of the auxiliary variables does not affect the qubit dynamics . since all terms in the action eq . , except for the noise term , have exactly one conjugate variable ( see eqs . ) , the resulting action is then in the desired form , @xmath330,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath331 are the rescaled conjugate variables . following the discussion in section [ sec - briefintro ] and the diagrammatic rules presented in the previous section , the order of expansion can be determined by counting the number of edges and vertices of a diagram . each vertex in a diagram contributes a factor of @xmath228 to its result , while each edge ( which represents a propagator ) contributes a factor of @xmath226 . therefore , each term ( diagram ) in the expansion carries a factor of @xmath332 , where @xmath333 , @xmath334 , and @xmath335 are numbers of its external edges ( edges that connect with ending vertices ) , internal edges , and vertices , respectively . this corresponds to the loop expansion where one instead counts the number of loops from @xmath336 , which leads to another way of writing the order of the expansion @xmath337 , noting that the number of external edges @xmath333 is fixed for each set of ending vertices . we show how to count the power of @xmath226 of the diagrams shown in figure [ fig - exdiagram ] . the numbers of edges , vertices , and loops are as follows : ( a ) @xmath338 , @xmath339 , @xmath340 , @xmath341 , ( b ) @xmath342 , @xmath343 , @xmath344 , @xmath341 , ( c ) @xmath342 , @xmath345 , @xmath346 , @xmath347 , giving the zeroth(zeroth ) , zeroth(first ) , and first(second ) orders of loop(@xmath226 ) , respectively . as an example of how to use the diagrammatic rules to compute statistical expectation values , we show a derivation of @xmath348 , an average of the @xmath90-coordinate of the quantum trajectories . from the variable transformation in eq . , we know that @xmath349 , therefore we can write the expectation value in terms of the free moments and then compute the diagrams from the vertices in table [ tb - vertices ] , @xmath350 \coordinate[label = below:$v_t$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$p_{v0}$ ] ( bp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw ( bp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\ , + \,\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8 cm ] \coordinate[label = below:$w_t$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$p_{w0}$ ] ( bp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw ( bp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture},\\ { \nonumber}=&\left\langle { v}(t)\,{v}_i \!\!\!\int \!\!\!{\mathrm{d}}t'\ , { p_v}(t')\delta ( t ' ) \right\rangle_f \\ & { \nonumber}+ \left\langle { w}(t)\,{w}_i \!\!\!\int \!\!\!{\mathrm{d}}t'\ , { p_w}(t')\delta ( t ' ) \right\rangle_f,\\ { \nonumber}= & \,{v}_i \!\!\ ! \int \!\!{\mathrm{d}}t ' g_{{v}}(t , t')\delta(t')+{w}_i \!\!\!\int\!\ ! { \mathrm{d}}t ' g_{{w}}(t , t')\delta(t ' ) , \\ = & \ , { v}_i e^{{\lambda}_2 t } + { w}_i e^{{\lambda}_3 t } , \quad \text{where $ t \ge 0$},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the green s functions are from eqs . . from the types of vertices in table [ tb - vertices ] , there is only one possibility connecting the ending vertices @xmath351 and @xmath352 with @xmath315 and @xmath320 , respectively . this is because choosing other vertices will lead to at least one unmatched noise variable @xmath71 , which , when trying to pair it with another vertex containing @xmath71 , will result in more unmatched conjugate variables . as a result , the expectation value eq . is explicitly found by transforming back to the system variables @xmath255 , @xmath353 which is exactly the same as the solution we would get from averaging over all possible noise realizations in the it stochastic master equations in eqs . and solving for an average of @xmath354 . the averages of @xmath92 and @xmath93 can be computed in the similar way . we note that the exact solution for the average trajectory involves only the diagrams with zeroth order of the small parameter @xmath226 ( @xmath355 ) . particularly , one can show that the average trajectory coincides with a saddle point solution of the action eq . when @xmath356 . the vanishing functional derivatives of the action over the variables @xmath331 gives the exact same equations eqs . ( though , the noise variable @xmath71 is no longer a stochastic function ) , while the vanishing functional derivatives over @xmath357 leads to the differential equations for conjugate variables , [ eq - saddlepointp ] @xmath358 where the noise variable is now a solution of extremizing the action over @xmath71 giving , @xmath359 as the noise parameter @xmath226 decreases to zero , as does the noise term @xmath71 , the ordinary differential equations of @xmath357 are uncoupled from eqs . and their solution ( a saddle point solution ) is then the same as the average trajectory , the solution of eqs . when @xmath360 . another example is a correlation function between the system variable @xmath90 and the noise variable @xmath71 , given by @xmath361 . since there are now two ending vertices , the situation is more complicated and there are infinitely many ways to connect the diagrams . however , we can compute terms to the lowest order of the loop expansion , which in this case is the zeroth loop ( tree - level diagrams ) . there are in total six contributions to the correlation function , as shown in the following , @xmath362 \coordinate [ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = left:$\xi_{t_2}$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of b2,label = above:$v_{t_1}$](a1 ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = above:$p_{v}$](ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( bp ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\,+ \!\!\!\!\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8 cm ] \coordinate [ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = left:$\xi_{t_2}$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$v$,label = above:$v$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left = of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0.3 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.1 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle2 ] ( ap ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( cp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( bp ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}+ \!\!\!\!\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8 cm ] \coordinate [ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = left:$\xi_{t_2}$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$w$,label = above:$v$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left = of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0.3 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.1 cm of cc , label = right:$w_0$](dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle2 ] ( ap ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( cp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( bp ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\\ { \nonumber}&+\!\!\!\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8 cm ] \coordinate [ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = left:$\xi_{t_2}$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of b2,label = above:$w_{t_1}$](a1 ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = above:$p_{w}$](ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( bp ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\,+\!\!\!\ ! \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8 cm ] \coordinate [ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = left:$\xi_{t_2}$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$w$,label = above:$w$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left = of ap , label = above:$w_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0.3 cm of cc , label = right:$w_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.1 cm of cc , label = right:$w_0$](dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle2 ] ( ap ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( cp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( bp ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}+ \!\!\!\!\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8 cm ] \coordinate [ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = left:$\xi_{t_2}$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$v$,label = above:$w$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left = of ap , label = above:$w_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0.3 cm of cc , label = right:$w_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.1 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle2 ] ( ap ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( cp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( bp ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture},\\ { \nonumber}= & \,\kappa_2 \!\!\int \!\!{\mathrm{d}}t ' g_{{v}}(t_1,t ' ) g_{\xi}(t',t_2)\\ { \nonumber}&+\alpha { v}_i^2\!\ ! \int\!\ ! { \mathrm{d}}t ' g_{{v}}(t_1 , t')g_{\xi}(t',t_2)g_{{v}}(t ' , 0)^2 + \cdots,\\ { \nonumber}=&\ , e^{{\lambda}_2 t_1}\left(\kappa_2 e^{-{\lambda}_2 t_2}+\alpha { v}_i^2 e^{{\lambda}_2 t_2}+\alpha { v}_i { w}_i e^{{\lambda}_3 t_2}\right)\\ & + e^{{\lambda}_3 t_1}\left(\kappa_3 e^{-{\lambda}_3 t_2}+\alpha { w}_i^2 e^{{\lambda}_3 t_2}+\alpha { v}_i { w}_i e^ { { \lambda}_2 t_2}\right),\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the superscript @xmath363 in the first line indicates the number of loops in the expansion , and , in the third line , we show only the integral form of the first two diagrams . this result involves diagrams with first order of the small noise parameter @xmath226 . the definitions of the parameters such as @xmath364 are defined in the discussion of eqs . - . we note that this result eq . is valid for @xmath304 and it is zero otherwise , because of the special properties of the left continuous heaviside step function @xmath296 . this can be interpreted as the noise being correlated with the qubit state at later times but not with the state at earlier times . this property of the system variable and noise the correlation function is also mentioned in ref . @xcite . let us next consider correlation functions between system variables at two points in time , such as @xmath365 and @xmath366 . both of them can be written in terms of correlation functions between the transformed system variables @xmath367 , for example , the @xmath90-@xmath90-correlation is , @xmath368 . as in the previous example , we keep terms up to the lowest order of loops , which is the zeroth order . each term of the correlation functions , for example @xmath369 , involves 10 different diagrams , thus there are in total @xmath370 diagrams for computing the @xmath90-@xmath90 correlation function . we present in the following three samples of diagrams and their integral forms for the correlation function @xmath371 , @xmath372 \coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$p_{v0}$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of b2,label = above:$v_{t_1}$](a1 ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = above:$p_{v0}$](ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw ( bp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( ap ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\,+\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8 cm ] \coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$p_v$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = above:$p_v$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\,+ \,\,\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8 cm ] \coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$p_v$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$v$,label = above:$v$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0.3 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.1 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle2 ] ( ap ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( cp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\\ { \nonumber } & + \text{(7 more similar diagrams)},\\ { \nonumber}= & \,\la { v}(t_1 ) \ra \la { v}(t_2 ) \ra \\ { \nonumber}&+\kappa_2 ^ 2\!\ ! \int\!\ ! { \mathrm{d}}t ' { \mathrm{d}}t '' g_{{v}}(t_1 , t')g_{{v}}(t_2 , t'')g_{\xi}(t ' , t'')\\ { \nonumber}&+\alpha \kappa_2 { v}_i^2 \!\!\int\!\ ! { \mathrm{d}}t ' { \mathrm{d}}t''\big\{g_{{v}}(t_1,t')g_{{v}}(t_2,t'')\\ & \qquad \quad g_{\xi}(t ' , t'')g_{{v}}(t',0)g_{{v}}(t',0)\big\ } + \cdots,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , apart from the first trivial diagram , each initial vertex ( @xmath373 or @xmath374 ) can connect to three possible interaction vertices ( @xmath245 , @xmath239 , or @xmath240 ) . as a result , there are total of @xmath375 possible ways , and they are presented in appendix [ app - fullform ] ( all diagrams except the first one are of the first order of @xmath226 ) . the similar kind of calculation is applied to the other correlation functions @xmath376 , @xmath377 and @xmath378 . the correlation function between @xmath93 and @xmath90 can be calculated in a similar way , with the same types of diagrams , but with extra prefactors @xmath379 and @xmath380 , @xmath381 where the coefficients @xmath382 and @xmath383 come from the transformation of variables shown in eq . . we compare the theoretical results , specifically the @xmath90-@xmath90 correlation computed in the previous section , with numerically simulated quantum trajectories . although , the solution of @xmath365 is not explicitly presented here in this paper , as it is too lengthy , it can be computed in a similar way as shown in eq . and also in appendix [ app - fullform ] . we show in figure [ fig - corrlimit](a ) and [ fig - corrlimit](d ) sampled individual trajectories generated from the monte carlo method ( appendix [ app - numer ] ) , in the regime where @xmath384 . the theoretical variances are computed from the @xmath90-@xmath90 correlation function , and they are shown in panels ( b ) and ( e ) along with the variances from the numerical trajectories . in the top panel , for efficient detection @xmath385 , the numerical variance increases in time and gets saturated ( not shown ) at around a value of @xmath386 for a long enough time , indicating that the qubit states at the later times are distributed throughout the perimeter of the @xmath93-@xmath90 plane of the bloch sphere . the variance from the tree - level diagram approximation fails to exactly capture the long - time behaviour , as we can see that the discrepancy in the panel ( b ) starts to grow as time increases . however , for the inefficient detection case , @xmath387 in figure [ fig - corrlimit](e ) , we can see that the theoretical approximation can explain the behaviour quite well , predicting the saturated variance at a value of @xmath388 . to compute this quantity theoretically , one takes a limit @xmath389 of the calculated variance @xmath390 . for the correlation function at two different times , we define a covariance as @xmath391 \equiv \langle z(t_1)z(t_2 ) \rangle - \langle z(t_1 ) \rangle \langle z(t_2 ) \rangle$ ] , and show in figure [ fig - corrlimit](c ) and [ fig - corrlimit](f ) its numerical and theoretical comparisons . we plot the covariance for @xmath392 and @xmath393 where @xmath394 has its value ranged from @xmath395 to @xmath396 . for the efficient detection case , shown in the panel ( c ) , the agreement between the theory and the simulation is better for the short time case , @xmath397 . for the inefficient detection case , panel ( f ) , the agreement is excellent for both @xmath398 and @xmath399 . since our theoretical results are derived with the small noise expansion around the saddle point solution ( or the average solution , see section [ sec - averagesol ] ) using @xmath226 as an expansion tracking parameter , the diagrammatic approximation method works well whenever the qubit trajectories are narrowly distributed around its average . this happens in the short - time regime when the diffusion is still small from the initial state , as well as in the regime when the dynamics is strongly suppressed by the dephasing mechanism ( when the detection efficiency is low ) . we note that for the long - time limit , one needs to compute higher order terms which contain more complex diagrams . however , there are other approaches , such as using the qubit master equation to approximate the correlation functions in the stationary limit and calculate spectral densities of the measurement readouts . these can be found in the works on continuous measurement of mesoscopic electronics such as in refs . @xcite . comparing to these approaches , our results give much more accurate correlation functions at short times . we can extend the discussion of the stochastic path integral formalism to its application to the system under continuous measurement with feedback control . the feedback loop consists of getting information about the system state via the measurement , and feeding back a control signal to the system in order to alter the state as desired . one of the most intuitive models of the feedback loop is that the system hamiltonian changes as a function of the system state , which then can be written as a function of the most recent measurement readout . for example , in our qubit measurement case , taking into account additional time delay @xmath400 , the hamiltonian at any time @xmath217 can be written as a function of the measurement readout in the past , @xmath401 , where the parameters @xmath101 and @xmath402 , as defined in section [ sec - qubit ] , are now functions of the measurement readout @xmath403 at time @xmath404 . we consider an ideal case with instantaneous feedback @xmath405 , i.e. , the measurement readout at time @xmath217 immediately changes the system parameters which are used in computing the state update at the time . this way , the formulation of the stochastic path integral as time - local , its action s extremization equations , and the diagrammatic expansion we presented so far are perfectly applicable . the only modification needed is to treat the readout - dependent hamiltonian parameters as functions of @xmath406 such as @xmath407 and @xmath408 ( or as functions of the quantum state at the time ) . in this section , we present a few examples of the continuous measurement of a qubit with feedback , one with a linear feedback in the form @xmath409 , and another with a state - dependent linear feedback to stabilize a qubit s oscillation . let us consider an instantaneous feedback loop in a qubit measurement introduced in section [ sec - qubit ] , with @xmath410 and the qubit rabi frequency being a function of the measurement readout . we assume a linear form of the rabi frequency as @xmath411 where @xmath406 is the readout as a function of time and @xmath412 are constant parameters characterizing the bare rabi oscillation and the linear feedback , respectively . we will see later in this subsection that this type of feedback can stabilize pre - determined ( arbitrary ) quantum states . this feedback loop in eq . has the advantage of fast processing because the qubit hamiltonian depends directly on the value of the measurement readout , requiring no knowledge of the qubit state . for simplicity , we limit our discussion to an ideal case in which the qubit is measured with an efficient detector and no extra environment dephasing . in this regime , we can re - parametrize the qubit bloch vector into a single state parameter @xmath413 where @xmath414 and @xmath415 ( we set @xmath416 in this case ) . we note that , with this linear feedback eq . , a typical step size for the qubit state defined as @xmath417 has average drift @xmath418 and diffusion @xmath419 of the first order of the time step . thus , the step size is still small . the statistics of quantum trajectories with this instantaneous feedback can be investigated following the same procedure presented in previous sections for the no - feedback qubit measurement . we start with writing the joint probability distribution of the trajectories , and then transform it into a path integral form . the action of the stochastic path integral with the feedback rabi frequency @xmath420 is given by , @xmath421 where @xmath422 , @xmath413 , and @xmath94 are functions of time , omitting the time argument . this is a generalization of the action given in ref . @xcite where the quantum jump in qubit measurement is analyzed . we note here that in eq . , we have chosen to use the @xmath70-expansion in both the state update and the readout probability distribution , because we are interested in investigating the action - extremized solutions , the optimal paths of the system . the optimal paths of the action in eq . are obtained by extremizing the action over all variables @xmath422 , @xmath413 , and @xmath94 , leading to two ordinary differential equations and one constraint , [ eq - fbodes ] @xmath423 with arbitrary boundary conditions on the variable @xmath413 and @xmath422 . the solutions of these equations are the most likely paths of the system . by writing the action in the form @xmath424)$ ] , where @xmath425 is a _ stochastic hamiltonian _ , we can examine the most likely paths by using phase space analysis @xcite , motivated by the phase space concept in classical mechanics . substituting the @xmath94 constraint in eqs . into the action ( equivalent to integrating the path integral over the variable @xmath426 ) , we obtain the action and the stochastic hamiltonian in terms of only the system variable @xmath413 and its conjugate @xmath422 , @xmath427 this quantity is explicitly time - independent and so it is a constant of motion for the most likely path , a solution of the ordinary differential equations in eqs . let us define the stochastic energy @xmath428 , and then solve for the conjugate variable @xmath429 as a function of @xmath413 and @xmath333 from eq . . each value of @xmath333 will then correspond to a curve in the phase space portrait , describing dynamics of the most likely paths , the same way the individual classical trajectories are depicted as constant - energy curves on a phase space plot . as an example , we show in figure [ fig - phasespace](a ) the phase space portrait for the pure linear feedback case ( i.e. , @xmath430 ) , where we plot the conjugate variable @xmath422 as a function of @xmath413 , @xmath431 for different values of @xmath333 . this is an interesting case . we can see from the phase space plot in figure [ fig - phasespace](a ) that there exists some attractors to which all states eventually limit to . these attractors coincide with the divergence of the conjugate variable @xmath429 in eq . , and also appear as stationary points where @xmath432 in eqs . . solving these equations , we obtain the attractors are located at @xmath433 and @xmath434 where @xmath435 is an even integer . these attractors may be interpreted as stabilized states achieved by turning on a linear feedback @xmath436 and turning off the bare qubit frequency @xmath437 . they are effectively the new collapse points , rather than at the poles of the bloch sphere , i.e. , @xmath438 ( @xmath439 ) . considering only angles between @xmath395 and @xmath440 , for the positive feedback @xmath441 , as @xmath442 increases from zero , the stabilized states @xmath443 move from @xmath395 and @xmath444 toward each other and coalesce at @xmath445 when @xmath446 ; whereas in the negative feedback @xmath447 , as @xmath442 grows , the stabilized states move toward each other in the region of @xmath444 and @xmath448 and coalesce at @xmath449 when @xmath450 . we simulate numerical qubit trajectories using the monte carlo method ( appendix [ app - numer ] ) , showing that individual trajectories initialized at different states are eventually pinned to the stabilized states as predicted from the most likely path phase space . this is shown in figure [ fig - phasespace](b ) for three different initial conditions , along with their most likely paths . in this subsection , we show an example using the path integral to compute a correlation function for a system with linear feedback loop . the feedback loop of this example resembles the one used in the solid - state qubit measurement in ref . @xcite which has been adapted and realized in the transmon qubit experiment @xcite . the theoretical setup is an oscillating qubit ( a double quantum dot ) continuously monitored by a near quantum - limited detector ( a quantum point contact ) , of which the hamiltonian and the measurement operator are in the same form as presented in section [ sec - qubit ] . we as before consider the ideal symmetric qubit case where @xmath410 , and the qubit is measured with an efficient detector with no extra environment dephasing . the qubit state is represented by a single parameter @xmath413 where @xmath451 and @xmath452 . the stochastic master equation for the qubit state , in the @xmath70-expansion similar to eqs . ( stratonovich form , as discussed in ref . @xcite ) , is given by , @xmath453 where @xmath413 and @xmath71 are functions of time and @xmath454 is the feedback rabi frequency , which is assumed to be a function of the qubit state @xmath413 . we later neglect the second term on the right side of eq . because we consider a diffusive rabi limit @xmath455 . the feedback protocol considered in this subsection ( and also in ref @xcite ) is a linear feedback designed to stabilize the quantum oscillation of the qubit state , against the random phase kicks due to the measurement . the desired qubit evolution is described by @xmath456 and @xmath457 where we define @xmath458 as the target oscillation frequency . the difference between the actual phase @xmath413 and the target phase @xmath459 , denoted as @xmath460 , is used to control the oscillating part of the qubit hamiltonian . therefore , we write the feedback rabi frequency as , @xmath461 , where @xmath462 is the dimensionless feedback factor . this feedback loop continuously corrects the random changes of the state made by the measurement so that the outcome trajectory closely follows the desired qubit oscillation . let us assume that the phase difference @xmath463 is a slowly changing variable as compared to the oscillation with the desired frequency @xmath458 . therefore , we can average the fluctuating process described in eq . over the oscillation period @xmath464 , taking @xmath463 to be constant during this period . the period @xmath465 will eventually be our new time scale . we define a new noise @xmath466 as a time - average of the last term of eq . over the oscillation period , @xmath467 with its zero ensemble average @xmath468 and its variance being @xmath469 . we then can simplify the differential equation eq . to one in terms of the phase difference @xmath463 , @xmath470 with the new time scale @xmath465 . here we will use the above differential equation eq . to compute a correlation function @xmath471 using the path integral approach . following the derivation of the action in eq . and where @xmath472 and @xmath473 are now our new system variable and a noise probability density function , we obtain the action in this form , @xmath474 omitting the boundary terms . note that we have written the pure imaginary conjugate variable ( @xmath475 ) explicitly with @xmath476 . as before , we can compute an average quantity by integrating the paths @xmath477 . so , we first write the correlation function @xmath478 in terms of the phase difference @xmath463 , then average over the oscillation period @xmath465 , getting rid of the fast fluctuating parts , and we are left with @xmath479\ra \cos ( \delta_d \tau)/2 + \sin[\delta \theta(t)-\delta \theta(t+\tau)]\ra \sin ( \delta_d \tau)/2 $ ] . the correlation function apparently can be written in terms of the real part and imaginary part of the following quantity , @xmath480 where we have used the same notations , such as @xmath481 for the integral over all possible paths @xmath482 , and @xmath38 for a normalized factor . the gaussian integral over @xmath466 in eq is quite straightforward resulting in a bilinear term in @xmath483 , which then leads to another gaussian integral of @xmath483 . as one would expect , these integrals generate another prefactor that cancels the normalized factor @xmath38 . consequently , the last integral over @xmath463 is left as @xmath484 where the exponent @xmath485 is given by , @xmath486 this effective action can be transformed further using the integration by parts , for example , @xmath487 , assuming that the boundary conditions for @xmath463 at both end points vanish . we then write the action in terms of the inverse green s function and the source term as discussed in section [ sec - briefintro ] , @xmath488 where the inverse green s function , the green s function , and a particular form of the source term are given by , @xmath489 performing the last gaussian functional integral over @xmath463 gives , @xmath490 for the positive value of the time difference @xmath394 . this quantity is a real number , therefore we obtain the correlation function , @xmath491 assuming that @xmath492 . this result agrees with the solution found in ref . @xcite which is presented in different notation . we have developed and extended the stochastic path integral technique to study statistical behaviour of a quantum system under weak continuous measurement , as well as measurement with feedback , presented with several qubit examples . the path integral approach is constructed based on the joint probability distribution of the measurement records , which is then extended to the distribution of quantum states , describing all possible quantum trajectories . we have shown that with this path integral and its action formalism , the optimal dynamics , such as the most likely paths , can be obtained naturally from the extremization of the action , whereas other statistical quantities can be achieved from direct integration or perturbation theory . in the case of plain measurement of a qubit , we have derived analytic solutions for the average trajectory , the variance , and the correlation functions conditioning on the fixed initial and final states , which show an excellent agreement with the numerically simulated data . we have also presented a diagrammatic perturbation method used in computing expectation values and correlation functions of quantum trajectories , and elaborated it with examples of the qubit with rabi oscillation case . the variances and multi - time correlation functions of qubit trajectories in the short - time regime have been revealed using this method given initial conditions , and the results are in good agreement with the numerical simulation . moreover , we have considered quantum measurement with feedback control , using the action principle to investigate the dynamics of the most likely paths of a qubit with linear feedback on its oscillating frequency . we have discovered that the direct linear feedback , manipulating the qubit hamiltonian instantly using the measurement readout , can stabilize the qubit state to arbitrarily chosen pure states . we have also considered the example of the feedback loop stabilizing the qubit rabi frequency introduced in ref . @xcite , and we have computed the correlation function for the qubit trajectory using the path integration method . so far , the stochastic path integral formalism in the context of continuous quantum measurement has been proven to be useful in studying the statistics of quantum trajectories ; however , there are some unsolved issues that need to be further explored . one is the limitation of the statistical average solutions derived from the perturbation expansion theory . only the first few orders of the expansion have been computed , resulting in the solutions that are valid only in the certain parameter regimes . we hope to find solutions in an arbitrary regime , possibly with some modifications of our approach . another issue is the assumption of the instantaneous feedback , which can be difficult to realize in experiments . feedback loops modelled with time delays will be taken into account in future work . we thank j. dressel for discussions , helpful comments on the manuscript , and for collaborating in our first paper on this subject @xcite . we thank i. siddiqi and s. g. rajeev for discussions . this work was supported by us army research office grants no . w911nf-09 - 0 - 01417 and no . w911nf-15 - 1 - 0496 , by national science foundation grant dmr-1506081 , by john templeton foundation grant i d 58558 , and by development and promotion of science and technology talents project thailand . there are interesting comparisons between the path integral formalism we introduced in the main text and other path integral approaches built upon feynman path integral in quantum mechanics @xcite . as we have shown , our formalism is aimed at describing the probability distribution of quantum trajectories , paths of state of a system under continuous measurement , on its quantum state space ( such as hilbert space for pure states ) . each individual quantum trajectory in the path integral is realizable and tractable , as demonstrated experimentally , such as , in solid - state systems @xcite . however , for other path integral formalisms developed from the feynman path integral to investigate quantum systems under measurement @xcite , the evolution of the quantum state ( or wavefunction ) is based on interference of all possible classical paths in measurable configuration space ( such as the system s positions or spin states ) . thus , in this latter case , the integrations are over configuration coordinates of the measured system . despite the differences in forms , the two approaches mentioned above can be related . the path integral via feynman s concept can be used to compute the probability distribution of the measurement results , which is then , as shown in the main text , one of the most important ingredients in constructing our stochastic paths in quantum state space . to elaborate this connection in more detail , we consider the path integral method presented by caves @xcite , for measurements providing information about the position @xmath493 of a nonrelativistic , one - dimensional quantum system , evolved in time . in that approach , the effect of measurements is to restrict the sum over paths by weighting each path differently depending on the measurement results . these weights appear in the path integral in ref . @xcite as the ` resolution amplitude ' , @xmath494 , which also accounts for the imprecision of the measurements . let us assume instantaneous position measurements that are equally distributed in times , at @xmath495 where @xmath496 , giving measurement readouts denoted by @xmath497 . the joint probability amplitude @xmath498 of the measurement records , and that the system is at @xmath499 at time @xmath500 , given an initial wavefunction @xmath501 , is in this form , @xmath502 where the position coordinates are denoted by @xmath503 at time @xmath504 , and the integral measure is defined as @xmath505 . we note here that we have modified the ordering of the measurements from the original version by caves , in which he assumed that the measurements start only after the initial state has evolved for time @xmath70 . we assume that this change has an infinitesimal effect on the probability amplitude as @xmath60 . the first bracketed term on the right hand side of eq . describes the influence of the measurement . without it , the path integral will be the usual feynman path integral , exactly equal to @xmath506 or the wave function at the final time @xmath150 . from eq . , the joint probability distribution function ( pdf ) of the sequence of measurement readouts can be obtained by integrating the square of the probability amplitude over the final coordinate @xmath499 , @xmath507 given the initial wavefunction @xmath501 . in order to see that this joint pdf in eq . is the same as what we have earlier in the main text ( in this special case ) , we first rewrite this term @xmath508 as a probability amplitude right after one measurement ( @xmath509 ) and one unitary transformation ( @xmath510 ) . then , we obtain a probability density function for the first measurement outcome as @xmath511 . we further introduce an updated wavefunction @xmath512 , a result of a state @xmath513 that has gone through one measurement @xmath514 and one unitary transformation @xmath510 , @xmath515 where the denominator assures the correct norm of the wavefunction . then , the joint distribution of the measurement readouts of the first two times is given by @xmath516 . repeating this procedure further to the next measurement readouts @xmath517 , at the end , we obtain the full joint pdf , @xmath518 as a product of the conditional probability density functions , defined in a general form as @xmath519 . this is the joint pdf of the measurement readouts , the main component of the joint pdf in eq . . to obtain an analogous form of the joint pdf in eq . , we add probability density functions of the quantum state ( or wavefunction ) as delta functions to every single time step . we obtain the full joint pdf , @xmath520 where the update state in this case is written as @xmath521 as in eq . . the integer @xmath6 is the dimension of the vector @xmath522 ( which maybe generalized to infinite dimension via a functional form of the @xmath523-function ) , and @xmath524 is called a joint probability density function of the measurement outcomes @xmath525 and the wavefunctions @xmath526 of the measured system . we note that our path integral presented in the main text deals with mixed states instead of pure states , and the system we consider is the qubit ( or spin ) system with the discrete basis , i.e. , @xmath527 . therefore , the operator @xmath514 in the discussion above is equivalent to what we have as the measurement operator @xmath528 , defined in section [ sec - qubit ] , and the resolution function is a gaussian function , @xmath529 for @xmath530 and @xmath531 . it is also worth mentioning that in our approach , the stochastic trajectories in quantum state spaces can be thought of as classical trajectories in configuration space , such as trajectories on the bloch sphere can be considered as three - dimensional random walks in a unit - radius sphere . then , one could find connections between our path integral and the formalism in classical stochastic processes , such as the pilgram - sukhorukov - jordan - bttiker path integral @xcite , the martin - siggia - rose formalism , the wiener integral , or feynman - kac path integral ( see eqs . , , and ) , however , we do not cover the discussion in this paper . we show the derivation here , how the action in eq . can be written in this form , @xmath532 = { \cal s}[\bar{u } ] - \frac{\tau_m}{2 \delta t } \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(\eta_{k+1}-\eta_k)^2,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath533 is the optimal path , extremizing the action @xmath128 $ ] . to see this , one can taylor expand the action eq . in discrete forms , such as @xmath128 = { \cal s}[\bar{u } + \eta ] = { \cal s}[\bar{u } ] + { \cal s}'[{\bar u}]\eta + \frac{1}{2}{\cal s}'[{\bar u}]\eta^2 + o(\eta^3)$ ] , and show that higher order terms vanish ( @xmath534 ) . however , there is a simpler way to see this , using the action in a continuous form , @xmath535 which is the same action as in eq . , with definitions of the time integral , @xmath536 , and the derivative , @xmath537 . in this form , one can see that the last two terms in the action can be integrated easily . the second term can be written in this general form , @xmath538 where @xmath539 . the contribution of this term to the action is only dependent on the boundary terms . therefore , we can write the last two terms in eq . as equivalent to @xmath540 . after this simplification , the first term in eq . can be written as @xmath541 , performing the integration by parts giving @xmath542 . the action is then given by , @xmath532 = { \cal s}[{\bar u } ] - \frac{\tau_m}{2}\!\!\ ! \int \!\!\ ! { \mathrm{d}}t \,{\dot \eta}(t)^2,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , @xmath543 = - \int_0^t \!\!\!{\mathrm{d}}t \left\ { \frac{\tau_m}{2 } { \dot { \bar u}}(t)^2 - \tanh { \bar u}(t ) { \dot { \bar u}}(t ) + \frac{1}{2 \tau_m } \right\},\end{aligned}\ ] ] is the action in terms of the optimal solution @xmath544 . we show here the inverse of the matrix @xmath144 in eq . , assuming that it is a square matrix with @xmath6 dimensions . the inverse matrix @xmath167 is given by , @xmath545 where the diagonal elements are of the form @xmath546 , where @xmath547 , and the other off - diagonal elements are @xmath176 for @xmath177 as verified by direct calculation . the solutions of the preselected and postselected average and variance in @xmath90 to infinite order are shown here . the average is given in terms of the infinite summation as , @xmath548 where the differentials in the bracket are evaluated at the optimal path @xmath533 . similarly , the variance is given by , @xmath549 the average @xmath550 are given explicitly in eq . in the main text . the numerical data presented in figure [ fig - qnd ] , [ fig - corrlimit ] and [ fig - phasespace ] are from the simulation of quantum trajectories using monte carlo method . the numerical trajectories are generated in @xmath0-discrete steps of @xmath70 . starting from an initial state @xmath16 , each step , we randomly generate a measurement readout from a distribution , for example , @xmath551 , and compute a quantum state from the update equation @xmath552 $ ] ( or @xmath109 $ ] ) , repeating the procedures from @xmath553 to @xmath28 to get a full trajectory @xmath554 . in figure [ fig - qnd ] , we simulate the data using @xmath555 time steps , with the step size @xmath556 and @xmath557 . in figure [ fig - corrlimit ] , we use @xmath558 , @xmath559 , and @xmath560 , where the rabi frequency @xmath402 is set to @xmath448 . we note that in the main text we present these numbers in the unit of @xmath80 . for the data presented in figure [ fig - phasespace ] , where the rabi oscillation is linearly dependent on the highly fluctuating measurement readouts , the state update equation needs to be modified to minimize numerical errors in each time step of the calculation . the update state is then computed from @xmath561 $ ] , where the measurement operator @xmath562 and unitary operator @xmath563 are each divided into 10 pieces and are operated onto the qubit state @xmath564 alternately . we simulate the data using @xmath565 time steps , with the step size @xmath559 and @xmath557 . the feedback rabi oscillation is @xmath566 , where @xmath2 is a generated measurement readout at time @xmath3 . in the main text , the state updating procedure is based on the assumption that a measurement outcome is randomly generated from a readout distribution @xmath19 , which is a function of a state right before the measurement . however , in the limit when the measurement readout is highly fluctuating , for example , the standard deviation of the readout distribution is much larger than the measurement response , @xmath567 , we can approximate the readout as a sum of two parts , one being its average ( which is related to the measured system state ) and another being a zero - mean independent fluctuating noise . following the readout distribution in eq . , the average of the readout at a time @xmath3 is exactly @xmath568 , therefore , we write @xmath569 where @xmath570 is a zero - mean gaussian white noise . the next step is to find a probability distribution for the independent noise @xmath570 , which we then approximate as having the same variance as the original distribution , which in this case the variance is @xmath571 . this approximation is valid as long as the variance is much larger than the separation between two outcomes @xmath572 and @xmath573 . a more rigorous proof can be done by writing @xmath574 where @xmath71 is a gaussian white noise with variance @xmath252 . note that @xmath71 is the time - derivative of the wiener increment , scaling as @xmath575 ( it calculus ) @xcite , therefore , in any expansion , we need to keep terms containing @xmath576 . using these rules , we can write , @xmath577 where these two equations are exactly equal in the expansion up to the first order of @xmath70 . the second line confirms that the distribution of @xmath570 is gaussian with the same variance @xmath571 and the mean @xmath123 . let us assume that @xmath92 is the only system variable we consider , where an update equation is written as @xmath578 and the probability density function for a measurement readout is proportional to @xmath579 . we then write the action for this system as , @xmath580 where @xmath184 is the conjugate variable . in this case , we could write the first term , @xmath581 , where @xmath582 , however , the matrix @xmath583 would not be a square matrix , and its inverse is not simply defined . therefore , we separate out one term , @xmath584 , from the sum , which symmetrizes the double sum , @xmath585 resulting in a square matrix @xmath586 , @xmath587 with the row index , @xmath588 to @xmath28 , and the column index , @xmath589 to @xmath0 . for the measurement readout term , we define its square matrix , @xmath590 with the row and column index being @xmath591 to @xmath28 . as a result , we can rewrite the action @xmath34 into two separated terms , a free action @xmath592 and an interaction action @xmath201 , where @xmath593 the appearance of the first term in the interaction action , @xmath594 , is the reason we have the extra terms ( we represented them as @xmath281 ) in eq . . we now show why the two - point correlation functions derived from our path integrals , such as the one derived from the free action in eq . , that is @xmath595 consist of a left continuous heaviside step functions @xmath296 that behaves differently from the usual heaviside step function . this left continuous heaviside step function has the properties , @xmath297 and @xmath596 , while the usual heaviside step function has properties , @xmath597 , @xmath596 , and @xmath598 . this is true from a point of view of the discrete form of a correlation function , @xmath599 , that the propagator has this property @xmath600 when @xmath601 and it vanishes otherwise . let us start from writing a free generating function in a discrete form , @xmath602 $ ] @xmath603= & \frac{\left(\frac{\delta t}{2 \pi}\right)^{\frac{n}{2}}}{(2 \pi i)^{n}}\int \!\!{\mathrm{d}}[x_k]_1^n \int \!\!{\mathrm{d}}[p_k]_0^{n-1 } \exp\left\{-\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\sum_{j=1}^{n } p_{i}(g^{-1}_x)_{i , j } x_j + \sum_{k=0}^{n-1 } p_k ( j_p)_k \delta t + \sum_{k=1}^{n } ( j_x)_k x_k \delta t\right\}\\ & \times \int { \mathrm{d}}[\xi_k]_0^{n-1 } \exp\left\{- \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\xi_i ( g^{-1}_\xi)_{i , j } \xi_j + \sum_{k=0}^{n-1 } \xi_k ( j_\xi)_k \delta t \right\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] these matrix integrals can be carried out using multi - dimensional gaussian integrals . the first one is , @xmath604},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath184 is a pure imaginary @xmath6-dimensional vector , @xmath605 , are real vectors , and @xmath606 is a real and invertible matrix . another is , @xmath607)^{1/2}},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath71 is a real @xmath6-dimensional vector and @xmath281 is a real and symmetric matrix . after integrating over all variables , the free generating function is given by , @xmath608 we note that the integrals generate a prefactor @xmath609 , knowing that @xmath610 , and another prefactor @xmath611 , which both are then canceled with the prefactor in eq . . also , from eqs . - , we can compute the inverses of them as , @xmath612 with the row index , @xmath613 to @xmath0 , and the column index , @xmath614 to @xmath28 , and @xmath615 with the row and column indices , @xmath591 to @xmath28 . now , let us compute the two - point correlation function @xmath616 , @xmath617_1^n \,{\mathrm{d}}[p_k]_0^{n-1 } { \mathrm{d}}[\xi_k]_0^{n-1 } ( x_a p_b ) \exp\left\{-\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\sum_{j=1}^{n } p_{i}(g^{-1}_x)_{i , j } x_j - \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\xi_i ( g^{-1}_\xi)_{i , j } \xi_j \right\ } \\ \nonumber = & \frac{1}{\delta t}\frac{\partial}{\partial ( j_x)_a}\frac{1}{\delta t } \frac{\partial}{\partial ( j_p)_b } z_f[j_x , j_p , j_\xi ] \bigg |_{j_x , j_p , j_\xi=0 } \\ \nonumber = & \frac{1}{\delta t}\frac{\partial}{\partial ( j_x)_a } \frac{1}{\delta t } \frac{\partial}{\partial ( j_p)_b}\exp\left[\sum_{i=1}^{n } \sum_{j=0}^{n-1 } ( j_x)_i ( g_x)_{i , j } ( j_p)_j \delta t^2\right ] \bigg |_{j_x , j_p=0}\\ = & ( g_x)_{a , b } = \begin{cases } 1 & \text { , if , } a \ge b+1 \text { , or , } a > b , \\ 0 & \text { , otherwise . } \end{cases}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath618 . the conclusion in the last line comes from the fact that the square matrix , @xmath619 , has the row and column indices different by one time step ( see eq . ) , which actually originates from the indices of , @xmath620 , and @xmath621 . continued from eq . , we presented all 10 diagrams here , @xmath623\coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$v_0 $ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of b2,label = above:$v_{t_1}$](a1 ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = above:$v_0$](ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw ( bp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( ap ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\,+ \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8cm]\coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2 ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\,+ \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8cm]\coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2 ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$v$,label = above:$v$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0.3 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.1 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle2 ] ( ap ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( cp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture } + \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8cm]\coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2 ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$w$,label = above:$v$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0.3 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.1 cm of cc , label = right:$w_0$](dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle2 ] ( ap ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( cp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture } + \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8cm]\coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$v$,label = above right:$v$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of bp](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0.1 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.3 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle2 ] ( bp ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( bp ) sin ( cp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture } \,+ \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8cm]\coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$v$,label = above right:$w$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of bp](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0.1 cm of cc , label = right:$w_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.3 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle2 ] ( bp ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( bp ) sin ( cp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\\ { \nonumber}&+\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8cm]\coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$v$,label = above right:$v$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$v$,label = above:$v$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of bp](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.4 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](dp ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](dd ) ; \coordinate[above=0.4 cm of dd , label = right:$v_0$](ep ) ; \coordinate[below=0 cm of dd , label = right:$v_0$](fp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( bp ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( bp ) sin ( cp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( ep ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( fp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( ep ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( fp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\ , + \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8cm]\coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$v$,label = above right:$w$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$v$,label = above:$v$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of bp](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0 cm of cc , label = right:$w_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.4 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](dp ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](dd ) ; \coordinate[above=0.4 cm of dd , label = right:$v_0$](ep ) ; \coordinate[below=0 cm of dd , label = right:$v_0$](fp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( bp ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( bp ) sin ( cp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( ep ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( fp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( ep ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( fp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\ , + \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8cm]\coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$v$,label = above right:$v$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$v$,label = above:$w$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of bp](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.4 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](dp ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](dd ) ; \coordinate[above=0.4 cm of dd , label = right:$w_0$](ep ) ; \coordinate[below=0 cm of dd , label = right:$v_0$](fp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( bp ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( bp ) sin ( cp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( ep ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( fp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( ep ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( fp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture}\,+ \begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=0.6 cm and 0.8cm]\coordinate[label = below:$v_{t_2}$ ] ( b2 ) ; \coordinate[right = of b2,label = below:$v$,label = above right:$w$ ] ( bp ) ; \coordinate[above = of bp , label = below right:$v$,label = above:$w$ ] ( ap ) ; \coordinate[left=1.1 cm of ap , label = above:$v_{t_1}$ ] ( a1 ) ; \coordinate[right = of bp](cc ) ; \coordinate[above=0 cm of cc , label = right:$w_0$](cp ) ; \coordinate[below=0.4 cm of cc , label = right:$v_0$](dp ) ; \coordinate[right = of ap](dd ) ; \coordinate[above=0.4 cm of dd , label = right:$w_0$](ep ) ; \coordinate[below=0 cm of dd , label = right:$v_0$](fp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( a1 ) -- ( ap ) ; \draw[particle ] ( b2 ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[gluon ] ( ap ) -- ( bp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( bp ) sin ( dp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( bp ) sin ( cp ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( ep ) ; \draw[particle ] ( ap ) sin ( fp ) ; \fill[black ] ( a1 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \fill[black ] ( b2 ) circle ( .05 cm ) ; \draw ( cp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( dp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( ep ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \draw ( fp ) circle ( .06 cm ) ; \end{tikzpicture},\\ { \nonumber}= & { v}_i^2 \,g_{{v}}(t_1,0 ) g_{{v}}(t_2,0 ) + \int { \mathrm{d}}t ' \left[g_{{v}}(t_1,t ' ) g_{{v}}(t_2,t')\left\{\kappa_2+\alpha { v}_i^2 g_{{v}}(t',0)^2 + \alpha { v}_i { w}_i g_{{v}}(t',0)g_{{w}}(t',0 ) \right\}^2\right],\\ = & { v}_i^2 e^{{\lambda}_2 t_1}e^ { { \lambda}_2 t_2}+ \int { \mathrm{d}}t ' \left [ e^{{\lambda}_2(t_1-t')}e^{{\lambda}_2(t_2-t')}\left\{\kappa_2 + \alpha { v}_i^2 \left(e^{{\lambda}_2 t'}\right)^2 + \alpha { v}_i { w}_i e^{{\lambda}_2 t ' } e^{{\lambda}_3 t ' } \right\}^2 \right],\end{aligned}\ ] ] 70ifxundefined [ 1 ] ifx#1 ifnum [ 1 ] # 1firstoftwo secondoftwo ifx [ 1 ] # 1firstoftwo secondoftwo `` `` # 1''''@noop [ 0]secondoftwosanitize@url [ 0 ] + 12$12 & 12#1212_12%12@startlink[1]@endlink[0]@bib@innerbibempty @noop _ ( , ) @noop _ _ ( , ) @noop _ _ ( , ) @noop _ _ ( , ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physreva.87.032115 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.97.166805 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.101.200401 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.112.080501 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.67.241305 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.112.170501 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physreva.49.2133 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physreva.62.012105 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevx.3.021008 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.66.041401 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.72.245322 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.71.201305 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physreva.67.030301 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.100.160503 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.33.1643 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.35.1815 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physreva.36.5543 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1007/bf02894935 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.93.260604 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physreve.75.051919 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1186/s13408 - 015 - 0018 - 5 [ * * , ( ) , 10.1186/s13408 - 015 - 0018 - 5 ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physreva.8.423 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.107.240501 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physreva.47.1652 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop _ _ ( , ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.63.085312 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevb.67.075303 [ * * , ( ) ] @noop _ _ , ed . ( , ) \doibase http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/aphy.1996.0052 [ * * , ( ) ] Abstract:
[ "we generalize and extend the stochastic path integral formalism and action principle for continuous quantum measurement introduced in [ a. chantasri , j. dressel and a. n. jordan , phys . rev . a * 88 * , 042110 ( 2013 ) ] , where the optimal dynamics , such as the most likely paths , is obtained by extremizing the action of the stochastic path integral . in this work , we apply exact functional methods as well as develop a perturbative approach to investigate the statistical behaviour of continuous quantum measurement . examples are given for the qubit case . for qubit measurement with zero qubit hamiltonian , we find analytic solutions for average trajectories and their variances while conditioning on fixed initial and final states . for qubit measurement with unitary evolution , we use the perturbation method to compute expectation values , variances , and multi - time correlation functions of qubit trajectories in the short - time regime . moreover , we consider continuous qubit measurement with feedback control , using the action principle to investigate the global dynamics of its most likely paths , and finding that in an ideal case , qubit state stabilization at any desired pure state is possible with linear feedback . we also illustrate the power of the functional method by computing correlation functions for the qubit trajectories with a feedback loop to stabilize the qubit rabi frequency ." ]
20,763
20,763
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: massive stars dominate the feedback to the local interstellar medium ( ism ) in star - forming galaxies via their stellar winds and ultimate death as core - collapse supernovae . in particular , wolf - rayet ( wr ) stars typically have wind densities an order of magnitude higher than massive o stars . they contribute to the chemical enrichment of galaxies , they are the prime candidates for the immediate progenitors of long , soft gamma ray bursts ( grbs , woosley & bloom 2006 ) , and they provide a signature of high - mass star formation in galaxies ( schaerer & vacca 1998 ) . spectroscopically , wr stars are spectacular in appearance , with strong , broad emission lines instead of the narrow absorption lines which are typical of normal stellar populations ( e.g. beals 1940 ) . the class are named after wolf & rayet ( 1867 ) who identified three stars in cygnus with such broad emission lines . it was immediately apparent that their spectra came in two flavours , subsequently identified as those with strong lines of helium and nitrogen ( wn subtypes ) and those with strong helium , carbon , and oxygen ( wc and wo subtypes ) . gamov ( 1943 ) first suggested that the anomalous composition of wr stars was the result of nuclear processed material being visible on their surfaces , although this was not universally established until the final decade of the 20th century ( lamers et al . 1991 ) . specifically , wn and wc stars show the products of the cno cycle ( h - burning ) and the triple-@xmath2 ( he - burning ) , respectively . in reality , there is a continuity of physical and chemical properties between o supergiants and wn subtypes . typically , wr stars have masses of 1025 @xmath1 , and are descended from o - type stars . they spend @xmath010% of their @xmath05myr lifetime as wr stars ( meynet & maeder 2005 ) . at solar metallicity the minimum initial mass for a star to become a wr star is @xmath025 @xmath1 . this corresponds closely to the humphreys & davidson ( 1979 ) limit for red supergiants ( rsg ) , according to a comparison between the current temperature calibration of rsg and stellar models that allow for mass - loss and rotation ( e.g. levesque et al . 2005 ) . consequently , some single wr stars are post - red supergiants within a fairly limited mass range of probably 2530@xmath1 . evolution proceeds via an intermediate luminous blue variable ( lbv ) phase above 30@xmath1 . for close binaries , the critical mass for production of a wr star has no such robust lower limit , since roche lobe overflow or common envelope evolution could produce a wr star instead of an extended rsg phase . the strong , broad emission lines seen in spectra of wr stars are due to their powerful stellar winds . the wind is sufficiently dense that an optical depth of unity in the continuum arises in the outflowing material . the spectral features are formed far out in the wind and are seen primarily in emission . the line and continuum formation regions are geometrically extended compared to the stellar radii and their physical depths are highly wavelength dependent . the unique spectroscopic signature of wr stars has permitted their detection individually in local group galaxies ( e.g. massey & johnson 1998 ; massey 2003 ) , collectively within knots of local star forming galaxies ( e.g. hadfield & crowther 2006 ) , and as significant contributors to the average rest - frame uv spectrum of lyman break galaxies ( shapley et al . 2003 ) . the present review focuses on observational properties of classical wolf - rayet stars in the milky way and beyond , plus physical and chemical properties determined from spectroscopic analysis , plus comparisons with interior evolutionary models , and provides revisions to the topic with respect to the excellent abbott & conti ( 1987 ) review . low mass ( @xmath3 ) central stars of planetary nebulae displaying a wolf - rayet spectroscopic appearance ( denoted [ wr ] ) are not considered . nevertheless , analysis tools discussed here are common to both types of star ( e.g. crowther et al . visual spectral classification of wr stars is based on emission line strengths and line ratios following smith ( 1968a ) . wn spectral subtypes follow a scheme involving line ratios of niii - v and hei - ii , ranging from wn2 to wn5 for ` early wn ' ( wne ) stars , and wn7 to wn9 for ` late wn ' ( wnl ) stars , with wn6 stars either early or late - type . a h suffix may be used to indicate the presence of emission lines due to hydrogen ( smith , shara & moffat 1996 ) . complications arise for wn stars with intrinsically weak emission lines . for example , wr24 ( wn6 ha ) has a heii @xmath44686 emission equivalent width that is an order of magnitude smaller than those in some other wn6 stars ; the ` ha ' nomenclature indicates that hydrogen is seen both in absorption and emission . from a standard spectroscopic viewpoint , such stars possess mid to late wn spectral classifications . however , their appearance is rather more reminiscent of of stars than classic wn stars , since there exists a continuity of properties between normal o stars and late - type wn stars . these stars are widely believed to be massive o stars with relatively strong stellar winds at a rather early evolutionary stage . they are believed not to represent the more mature , classic he - burning wn stars . smith , crowther & prinja ( 1994 ) extended the wn sequence to very late wn1011 subtypes in order to include a group of emission line stars originally classified as ofpe / wn9 ( bohannan & walborn 1989 ) . wn11 subtypes closely resemble extreme early - type b supergiants except for the presence of heii @xmath44686 emission . a quantitative comparison of optical line strengths in of and wnl stars is presented in figure 8 of bohannan & crowther ( 1999 ) . r127 ( wn11 ) in the large magellanic cloud ( lmc ) was later identified as a lbv ( stahl et al . 1983 ) , whilst a famous galactic lbv , ag car exhibited a wn11-type spectrum at visual minimum ( walborn 1990 ; smith et al . 1994 ) . various multi - dimensional classification systems have been proposed for wn stars ; they generally involve line strengths or widths , such that strong / broad lined stars have been labelled wn - b ( hiltner & schild 1966 ) , wn - s ( hamann , koesterke & wessolowski 1993 ) or wnb ( smith , shara & moffat 1996 ) . of these , none have generally been adopted . from a physical perspective , strong- and weak - lined wn stars do form useful sub - divisions . therefore we shall define weak ( -w ) and strong ( -s ) wn stars as those with heii @xmath45412 equivalent widths smaller than or larger than 40 . an obvious limitation of such an approach is that intrinsically strong - lined wn stars would be diluted by binary companions or nearby stars in spatially crowded regions and so might not be identified as such . wne - w stars tend to exhibit triangular line profiles rather than the more typical gaussian lines of wne - s stars ( marchenko et al . 2004 ) , since one observes material much closer to the stellar core that is being strongly accelerated . wc spectral subtypes depend on the line ratios of ciii and civ lines along with the appearance of o iii - v , spanning wc4 to wc9 subtypes , for which wc46 stars are ` early ' ( wce ) and wc79 are ` late ' ( wcl ) . rare , oxygen - rich wo stars form an extension of the wce sequence , exhibiting strong ovi @xmath53811 - 34 emission ( kingsburgh , barlow & storey 1995 ) . the most recent scheme involves wo1 to wo4 subtypes depending on the relative strength of ov - vi and c iv emission lines ( crowther , de marco & barlow 1998 ) . finally , civ @xmath45801 - 12 appears unusually strong in an otherwise normal wn star in a few cases , leading to an intermediate wn / c classification ( conti & massey 1989 ) . wn / c stars are indeed considered to be at an intermediate evolutionary phase between the wn and wc stages . representative examples of wn and wc stars are presented in figure [ wnc - montage ] . various x - ray to mid - ir spectroscopic datasets of galactic wolf - rayet stars are presented in table [ atlas ] , including extreme ultraviolet synthetic spectra from model atmospheres ( smith , norris & crowther 2002 ; hamann & grfener 2004 ) . wr stars can not be distinguished from normal hot stars using ubv photometry . broad - band visual measurements overestimate the true continuum level in extreme cases by up to 1 magnitude , or more typically 0.5 mag for single early - type wr stars due to their strong emission - line spectra . consequently , westerlund ( 1966 ) introduced narrow - band @xmath6 filters that were specifically designed to minimize the effect of wr emission lines ( although their effect can not be entirely eliminated ) . these passbands were later refined by smith ( 1968b ) and by massey ( 1984 ) , such that most photometry of wr stars has used the @xmath7 filter system , which is compared to johnson ubv filters in fig . [ wnc - montage ] . as with normal stars , @xmath8 photometry permits a determination of the interstellar extinction , @xmath9 . let us adopt a typical ratio of total , @xmath10 to selective , @xmath11 extinction , @xmath12 . following turner ( 1982 ) , the broad - band and narrow - band optical indices for wr stars are then related by : @xmath13 a direct determination of wr distances via stellar parallax is only possible for @xmath14 vel ( wc8+o ) using _ hipparcos _ , and even that remains controversial ( millour et al . otherwise , cluster or association membership is used to provide an approximate absolute magnitude - spectral type calibration for milky way wr stars . the situation is much better for wr stars in the magellanic clouds , although not all subtypes are represented . typical absolute magnitudes range from @xmath15 = 3 mag at earlier subtypes to 6 mag for late subtypes , or exceptionally 7 mag for hydrogen - rich wn stars . the typical spread is @xmath160.5 mag at individual subtypes . conti ( 1976 ) first proposed that a massive o star may lose a significant amount of mass via stellar winds , revealing first the h - burning products at its surface , and subsequently the he - burning products . these evolutionary stages are spectroscopically identified with the wn and wc types . this general picture has since become known as the ` conti scenario ' . such stars should be over - luminous for their mass , in accord with observations of wr stars in binary systems . massey ( 2003 ) provides a more general overview of massive stars within local group galaxies . wolf - rayet stars are located in or close to massive star forming regions within the galactic disk . a catalogue is provided by van der hucht ( 2001 ) . a quarter of the known wr stars in the milky way reside within massive clusters at the galactic centre or in westerlund 1 ( van der hucht 2006 ) . from membership of wr stars in open clusters , schild & maeder ( 1984 ) and massey , degioia - eastwood & waterhouse ( 2001 ) investigated the initial masses of wr stars empirically . a revised compilation is provided in crowther et al . ( 2006b ) . overall , hydrogen - rich wn stars ( wnha ) are observed in young , massive clusters ; their main - sequence turn - off masses ( based on meynet et al . 1994 isochrones ) suggest initial masses of @xmath17 , and are believed to be core - h burning ( langer et al . 1994 ; crowther et al . lower - mass progenitors of 4050@xmath1 are suggested for classic mid - wn , late wc , and wo stars . progenitors of some early wn stars appear to be less massive still , suggesting an initial - mass cutoff for wr stars at solar metallicity around 25@xmath1 . from an evolutionary perspective , the absence of rsgs at high luminosity and presence of h - rich wn stars in young massive clusters suggests the following variation of the conti scenario in the milky way , i.e. for stars initially more massive than @xmath18 @xmath19 whereas for stars of initial mass from @xmath20 , @xmath21 and for stars of initial mass in the range 2540@xmath1 , @xmath22 indeed , the role of the lbv phase is not yet settled it may be circumvented entirely in some cases ; it may follow the rsg stage , or it may even dominate pre - wr mass - loss for the most massive stars ( langer et al . 1994 ; smith & owocki 2006 ) . conversely , the presence of dense , circumstellar shells around type iin sn indicates that some massive stars may even undergo core - collapse during the lbv phase ( smith et al . remarkably few milky way clusters host both rsg and wr stars , with the notable exception of westerlund 1 ( clark et al . 2005 ) ; this suggests that the mass range common to both populations is fairly narrow . although optical narrow - band surveys ( see below ) have proved very successful for identifying wr stars in the solar neighbourhood , only a few hundred wr stars are known in the milky way , whilst many thousands are expected within the galactic disk ( van der hucht 2001 ) . consequently , near - ir narrow - band imaging surveys together with spectroscopic follow - up may be considered for more extensive surveys to circumvent high interstellar extinction ( homeier et al . . limitations of ir emission - line surveys are that fluxes of near - ir lines are much weaker than those of optical lines , also , no strong wr lines are common to all spectral types in the frequently used k band . an added complication is that some wc stars form dust which heavily dilutes emission line fluxes longward of the visual . nevertheless , infrared surveys are presently underway to get an improved census of wr stars in the milky way . alternatively , wr candidates may be identified from their near- to mid - ir colours , which , as in other early - type supergiants , are unusual due to strong free - free excess emission ( hadfield et al . 2007 ) . wr stars have typically been discovered via techniques sensitive to their unusually broad emission - line spectra , based on objective prism searches or interference filter imaging ( see massey 2003 ) . narrow - band interference filter techniques have been developed ( e.g. moffat , seggewiss & shara 1985 ; massey , armandroff & conti 1986 ) that distinguish strong wr emission lines at heii @xmath44686 ( wn stars ) and ciii @xmath44650 ( wc stars ) from the nearby continuum . such techniques have been applied to regions of the milky way disk , the magellanic clouds and other nearby galaxies . an example of this approach is presented in figure [ ngc300 ] for the spiral galaxy ngc 300 ( @xmath23 2 mpc ) . a wide - field image of ngc 300 is presented , with ob complex iv - v indicated , together with narrow - band images centred at @xmath44684 ( heii 4686 ) and @xmath44781 ( continuum ) . several wr stars are seen in the difference ( heii - continuum ) image , including an apparently single wc4 star ( schild et al . 2003 ) . it is well established that the absolute number of wr stars and their subtype distribution are metallicity dependent . n(wr)/n(o)@xmath00.15 in the relatively metal - rich solar neighbourhood ( conti et al . 1983 ; van der hucht 2001 ) , yet n(wr)/n(o)@xmath00.01 in the metal - deficient smc on the basis of only 12 wr stars ( massey , olsen & parker 2003 ) versus @xmath01000 o stars ( evans et al . it is believed that the majority of galactic wr stars are the result of single - star evolution , yet some stars ( e.g. v444 cyg ) result from close binary evolution ( vanbeveren et al . 1998 ) . similar relative numbers of wn to wc stars are observed in the solar neighbourhood ( hadfield et al . in contrast , wn stars exceed wc stars by a factor of @xmath05 and @xmath010 for the lmc and smc , respectively ( breysacher , azzopardi & testor 1999 ; massey , olsen & parker 2001 ) . at low metallicity the reduced wr population and the relative dominance of wn subtypes most likely result from the metallicity dependence of winds from their evolutionary precursors ( mokiem et al . consequently , only the most massive single stars reach the wr phase in metal - poor environments . single stars reaching the wc phase at high metallicity may end their lives as a rsg or wn stars in a lower metallicity environment . as such , one might suspect that most wr stars at low metallicity are formed via binary evolution . however , foellmi , moffat & guerrero ( 2003a ) suggest a similar wr binary fraction for the smc and milky way . not all wr subtypes are observed in all environments . early wn and wc subtypes are preferred in metal - poor galaxies , such as the smc ( massey et al . 2003 ) , while late wc stars are more common at super - solar metallicities , such as m83 ( hadfield et al . 2005 ) line widths of early wc and wo stars are higher than late wc stars , although width alone is not a defining criterion for each spectral type . the correlation between wc subclass and line width is nevertheless strong ( torres , conti & massey 1986 ) . the subtype distributions of wr stars in the solar neighbourhood , lmc , and smc are presented in figure [ wrpop ] . we shall address this aspect in sect [ metallicity ] . individual wr stars may , in general , be resolved in local group galaxies from ground - based observations , whilst the likelihood of contamination by nearby sources increases at larger distances . for example , a typical slit width of 1@xmath24 at the 2mpc distance of ngc 300 corresponds to a spatial scale of @xmath010 pc . relatively isolated wr stars have been identified , albeit in the minority ( recall figure [ ngc300 ] ) . this is even more problematic for more distant galaxies such as m 83 where the great majority of wr stars are observed in clusters or associations ( hadfield et al . 2005 ) . so - called ` wr galaxies ' are typically starburst regions exhibiting spectral features from tens , hundreds , or even thousands of wr stars ( schaerer , contini & pindao 1999 ) . average milky way / lmc wn or wc line fluxes ( schaerer & vacca 1998 ) are typically used to calculate stellar populations in wr galaxies . these should be valid provided that the line fluxes of wr templates do not vary with environment . however , it is well known that smc wn stars possess weak emission lines ( conti , garmany & massey 1989 ) . in spite of small statistics and a large scatter , the mean heii @xmath44686 line luminosity of wn24 stars in the lmc is 10@xmath25 ergs@xmath26 , a factor of five times higher than the mean of equivalent stars in the smc ( crowther & hadfield 2006 ) . the signature of wn stars is most readily seen in star forming galaxies at heii @xmath41640 , where the dilution from other stellar types is at its weakest ( e.g. hadfield & crowther 2006 ) . the strongest uv , optical , and near - ir lines indicate flux ratios of @xmath27(heii 1640)/@xmath27(heii 4686)@xmath010 and @xmath27(he ii 4686)/@xmath27(heii 1.012@xmath28m)@xmath06 for wn stars spanning smc to milky way metallicities . similar comparisons for wc stars are hindered because the only carbon - sequence wr stars at the low metallicity of the smc and ic 1613 are wo stars . their emission line fluxes are systematically weaker than wc stars in the lmc and milky way ( kingsburgh et al . 1995 ; kingsburgh & barlow 1995 ; schaerer & vacca 1998 ) . the mean civ @xmath55801 - 2 line luminosity of wc4 stars in the lmc is @xmath29 ergs@xmath26 ( crowther & hadfield 2006 ) . again , detection of wc stars is favoured via ultraviolet spectroscopy of civ @xmath41550 . for wc stars , the strongest uv , optical , and near - ir lines possess flux ratios of @xmath27(civ 1548 - 51)/@xmath27(civ 5801 - 12)@xmath06 and @xmath27(c iv 5801 - 12)/@xmath27(civ 2.08@xmath28m)@xmath015 . the observed binary fraction amongst milky way wr stars is 40% ( van der hucht 2001 ) , either from spectroscopic or indirect techniques . within the low metallicity magellanic clouds , close binary evolution would be anticipated to play a greater role because of the diminished role of o star mass - loss in producing single wr stars . however , where detailed studies have been carried out ( bartzakos , moffat & niemela 2001 ; foellmi , moffat & guerrero 2003ab ) , a similar binary fraction to the milky way has been obtained ( recall figure [ wrpop ] ) , so metallicity - independent lbv eruptions may play a dominant role . the most robust method of measuring stellar masses is from kepler s third law of motion , particularly for eclipsing double - lined ( sb2 ) systems , from which the inclination may be derived . orbital inclinations may also be derived from linear polarization studies ( e.g. st - louis et al . 1993 ) or atmospheric eclipses ( lamontagne et al . 1996 ) . masses for galactic wr stars are included in the van der hucht ( 2001 ) compilation , a subset of which are presented in figure [ binary_masses ] together with some more recent results . wc masses span a narrow range of 916@xmath1 , whilst wn stars span a very wide range of @xmath01083@xmath1 , and in some cases exceed their ob companion , i.e. @xmath30 ( e.g. wr22 : schweickhardt et al . 1999 ) . wr20a ( smsp2 ) currently sets the record for the highest orbital - derived mass of any star , with @xmath31 for each wn6 ha component ( rauw et al . as discussed above , such stars are h - rich , extreme o stars with strong winds rather than classical h - poor wn stars . they are a factor of two lower in mass than the apparent @xmath32 stellar mass limit ( figer 2005 ) , such that still more extreme cases may await discovery . spectroscopic measurement of masses via surface gravities using photospheric lines is not possible for wr stars due to their dense stellar winds . rotation is very difficult to measure in wr stars , since photospheric features used to estimate @xmath33 in normal stars are absent . velocities of 200500 kms@xmath26 have been inferred for wr138 ( massey 1980 ) and wr3 ( massey & conti 1981 ) , although these are not believed to represent rotation velocities , since the former has a late - o binary companion , and the absorption lines of the latter are formed within the stellar wind ( marchenko et al . 2004 ) . fortunately , certain wr stars do harbour large scale structures , from which a rotation period may be inferred ( st - louis et al . 2007 ) . alternatively , if wr stars were rapid rotators , one would expect strong deviations from spherical symmetry due to gravity darkening ( von zeipel 1924 ; owocki , cranmer & gayley 1996 ) . harries , hillier & howarth ( 1998 ) studied linear spectropolarimetric datasets for 29 galactic wr stars , from which just four single wn stars plus one wc+o binary revealed a strong line effect , suggesting significant departures from spherical symmetry . they presented radiative transfer calculations which suggest that the observed continuum polarizations for these stars can be matched by models with equator to pole density ratios of 23 . of course , the majority of milky way wr stars do not show a strong linear polarization line effect ( e.g. kurosawa , hillier & schulte - ladbeck ( 1999 ) . ring nebulae are observed for a subset of wr stars . these are believed to represent material ejected during the rsg or lbv phases that is photo - ionized by the wr star . the first known examples , ngc 2359 and ngc 6888 , display a shell morphology , although many subsequently detected in the milky way and magellanic clouds exhibit a variety of spatial morphologies ( chu , treffers & kwitter 1983 ; dopita et al . nebulae are predominantly associated with young wr stars i.e. primarily wn subtypes , with typical electron densities of 10@xmath34 @xmath35 to 10@xmath36 @xmath35 ( esteban et al . 1993 ) . ring nebulae provide information on evolutionary links between wr stars and their precursors ( weaver et al . once a massive star has reached the wr phase , its fast wind will sweep up the material ejected during the immediate precursor ( lbv or rsg ) slow wind . the dynamical evolution of gas around wr stars with such progenitors has been discussed by garca - segura , maclow & langer ( 1996a ) and garca - segura , langer & maclow ( 1996b ) . esteban et al . ( 1993 ) attempted to derive wr properties indirectly from hii regions associated with selected milky way stars ( see also crowther et al . unfortunately , relatively few hii regions are associated with individual wr stars , and for the majority of these , the nebular parameters are insufficiently well constrained to distinguish between different stellar atmosphere models . our interpretation of hot , luminous stars via radiative transfer codes is hindered with respect to normal stars by several effects . first , the routine assumption of lte breaks down for high - temperature stars . in non - lte , the determination of populations uses rates which are functions of the radiation field , itself a function of the populations . consequently , it is necessary to solve for the radiation field and populations iteratively . second , the problem of accounting for the effect of millions of spectral lines upon the emergent atmospheric structure and emergent spectrum known as line blanketing remains challenging for stars in which spherical , rather than plane - parallel , geometry must be assumed due to stellar winds , since the scale height of their atmospheres is not negligible with respect to their stellar radii . the combination of non - lte , line blanketing ( and availability of atomic data thereof ) , and spherical geometry has prevented the routine analysis of such stars until recently . radiative transfer is either solved in the co - moving frame , as applied by cmfgen ( hillier & miller 1998 ) and powr ( grfener , koesterke & hamann 2002 ) or via the sobolev approximation , as used by isa - wind ( de koter , schmutz & lamers 1993 ) . the incorporation of line blanketing necessitates one of several approximations . either a ` super - level ' approach is followed , in which spectral lines of a given ion are grouped together in the solution of the rate equations ( anderson 1989 ) , or alternatively , a monte carlo approach is followed , which uses approximate level populations ( abbott & lucy 1985 ) . stellar temperatures for wr stars are difficult to characterize , because their geometric extension is comparable with their stellar radii . atmospheric models for wr stars are typically parameterized by the radius of the inner boundary @xmath37 at high rosseland optical depth @xmath38 ) . however , only the optically thin part of the atmosphere is seen by the observer . the measurement of @xmath37 depends upon the assumption that the same velocity law holds for the visible ( optically thin ) and the invisible ( optically thick ) part of the atmosphere . the optical continuum radiation originates from a ` photosphere ' where @xmath39 . typical wn and wc winds have reached a significant fraction of their terminal velocity before they become optically thin in the continuum . @xmath40 , the radius at @xmath41 lies at highly supersonic velocities , well beyond the hydrostatic domain . for example , crowther et al . ( 2006a ) obtain @xmath37 = 2.9@xmath42 and @xmath40 = 7.7@xmath42 for hd 50896 ( wn4b ) , corresponding to @xmath43 = 85kk and @xmath44 = 52kk , respectively . in some weak - lined , early - type wn stars , this is not strictly true since their spherical extinction is modest , in which case r@xmath45 ( e.g. hd 9974 , marchenko et al . 2004 ) . stellar temperatures of wr stars are derived from lines from adjacent ionization stages of helium or nitrogen for wn stars ( hillier 1987 , 1988 ) , or lines of carbon for wc stars ( hillier 1989 ) . high stellar wind densities require the simultaneous determination of mass - loss rate and stellar temperature from non - lte model atmospheres , since their atmospheres are so highly stratified . metals such as c , n and o provide efficient coolants , such that the outer wind electron temperature is typically 8kk to 12kk ( hillier 1989 ) . figure [ wr_ross ] compares @xmath37 , @xmath40 , and the principal optical wind line - forming region ( @xmath46 to 10@xmath47 @xmath35 ) for hd 66811 ( @xmath48 pup , o4i(n)f ) , hd 96548 ( wr40 , wn8 ) and hd 164270 ( wr103 , wc9 ) on the same physical scale . some high - ionization spectral lines ( e.g. nv and civ lines in wn8 and wc9 stars , respectively ) are formed at higher densities of @xmath49 @xmath35 in the wr winds . derived stellar temperatures depend sensitively upon the detailed inclusion of line - blanketing by iron peak elements . inferred bolometric corrections and stellar luminosities also depend upon detailed metal line - blanketing ( schmutz 1997 ; hillier & miller 1999 ) . until recently , the number of stars studied with non - lte , clumped , metal line - blanketed models has been embarrassingly small , due to the need for detailed , tailored analysis of individual stars using a large number of free parameters . hamann , grfener & liermann ( 2006 ) have applied their grid of line - blanketed wr models to the analysis of most galactic wn stars , for the most part resolving previous discrepancies between alternate line diagnostics , which were first identified by crowther et al . ( 1995b ) . to date , only a limited number of wc stars in the milky way and magellanic clouds have been studied in detail ( e.g. dessart et al . 2000 ; crowther et al . 2002 ; barniske , hamann & grfener 2007 ) . results for galactic and lmc wr stars are presented in table [ wrtemp ] . these range from 30kk amongst wn10 subtypes to 40kk at wn8 and approach 100kk for early - type wn stars . spectroscopic temperatures are rather higher for wc stars , i.e. 50kk for wc9 stars , increasing to 70kk at wc8 and @xmath50100kk for early wc and wo stars stellar structure models predict radii @xmath51 that are significantly smaller than those derived from atmospheric models . for example , @xmath52 for hd 191765 ( wr134 , wn6b ) in table [ wrtemp ] , versus @xmath53 which follows from hydrostatic evolutionary models , namely @xmath54 for hydrogen - free wr stars ( schaerer & maeder 1992 ) . theoretical corrections to such radii are frequently applied , although these are based upon fairly arbitrary assumptions which relate particularly to the velocity law . consequently , a direct comparison between temperatures of most wr stars from evolutionary calculations and empirical atmospheric models is not straightforward , except that one requires @xmath55 , with the difference attributed to the extension of the supersonic region . petrovic , pols & langer ( 2006 ) established that the hydrostatic cores of metal - rich wr stars above @xmath56 exceed @xmath51 in eqn [ radii ] by significant factors if mass - loss is neglected , due to their proximity to the eddington limit , @xmath57 = 1 . here , the eddington parameter , @xmath57 , is the ratio of radiative acceleration due to thompson ( electron ) scattering to surface gravity and may be written as @xmath58 where the number of free electrons per atomic mass unit is @xmath59 . in reality , high empirical wr mass - loss rates imply that inflated radii are not expected , such that the discrepancy in hydrostatic radii between stellar structure and atmospheric models has not yet been resolved . absolute visual magnitudes of wr stars are obtained primarily from calibrations obtained from cluster or association membership ( van der hucht 2001 ) . inferred bolometric corrections range from @xmath60 = 2.7 mag amongst very late wn stars ( crowther & smith 1997 ) to approximately 6 mag for weak - lined , early - type wn stars and wo stars ( crowther et al . 1995b ; crowther et al . 2000 ) . stellar luminosities of milky way wn stars range from 200,000 @xmath61 in early - type stars to 500,000 @xmath61 in late - type stars . hydrogen - burning o stars with strong stellar winds , spectroscopically identified as wnha stars , have luminosities in excess of @xmath62 . for milky way wc stars , inferred stellar luminosities are @xmath0150,000 @xmath61 , increasing by a factor of two for lmc wc stars ( table [ wrtemp ] ) . systematically higher spectroscopic luminosities have recently been determined by hamann , grfener & liermann ( 2006 ) for galactic wn stars , since they adopt uniformly high @xmath63 mag for all non - cluster member wn69h stars . absolute magnitudes for normal late - type wn stars are subject to large uncertainties since such stars positively shy away from clusters . as a consequence , their results suggest a bi - modal distribution around @xmath64 for early wn stars , and 12@xmath65 for all late wn stars . from stellar structure theory , there is a mass - luminosity relation for h - free wr stars which is described by @xmath66 this expression is effectively independent of the chemical composition since the continuum opacity is purely electron scattering ( schaerer & maeder 1992 ) . spectroscopic luminosities need to be corrected for the luminosity that powers the stellar wind , @xmath67 , in order to determine the underlying nuclear luminosity , @xmath68 . in most cases , the recent reduction in estimates of mass - loss rates due to wind clumping ( see sect . [ clump ] ) , plus the increase in derived luminosities due to metal line - blanketing indicate a fairly modest corrective factor . from table [ wrtemp ] , one expects typical masses of 1015 @xmath1 for hydrogen - free wr stars , which agree fairly well with binary mass estimates ( recall fig . [ binary_masses ] ) . indeed , spectroscopically derived wr masses obtained using this relationship agree well with binary derived masses ( e.g. @xmath14 vel : de marco et al . 2000 ) . lyman continuum ionizing fluxes , n(lyc ) , are typical of mid - o stars in general ( table [ wrtemp ] ) . as such , the low number of wr stars with respect to o stars would suggest that wolf - rayet stars play only a minor role in the lyman continuum ionization budget of young star - forming regions . h - rich late - type wn stars provide a notable exception , since their ionizing output compares closely to o2 stars ( walborn et al . 2004 ) . crowther & dessart ( 1998 ) showed that the wn6 ha stars in ngc 3603 provided @xmath020% of the lyman continuum ionizing photons , based upon calibrations of non - blanketed models for o and wr stars . since wr stars represent an extension of o stars to higher temperatures , significant hei continuum photons are emitted , plus strong heii continua for a few high - temperature , low - density cases . the primary effect of metal - line blanketing is to redistribute extreme uv flux to longer wavelengths , reducing the ionization balance in the wind , such that higher temperatures and luminosities are required to match the observed wr emission line profile diagnostics relative to unblanketed models . recent revisions to estimated temperatures and luminosities of o stars ( as measured from photospheric lines ) have acted in the reverse sense , relative to previous plane - parallel unblanketed model analysis , due to backwarming effects , as shown in a number of recent papers ( e.g. martins , schaerer & hillier 2002 ; repolust , puls & herrero 2004 ) . common techniques are generally now employed for o and wr studies , such that a factor of two increase in n(lyc ) for wr stars plus the reverse for o stars suggests that in such cases wr stars might provide close to half of the total ionizing photons in the youngest starbursts , such as ngc 3603 . the strength of wr winds affects the hardness of their ionizing radiation . atmospheric models for wr stars with dense winds produce relatively soft ionizing flux distributions , in which extreme uv photons are redistributed to longer wavelength by the opaque stellar wind ( schmutz , leitherer & gruenwald 1992 ) . in contrast , for the low wind - density case , a hard ionizing flux distribution is predicted , in which extreme uv photons pass through the relatively transparent wind unimpeded . consequently , the shape of the ionizing flux distribution of wr stars depends on both the wind density and the stellar temperature . we shall show in section [ mdot ] that low - metallicity wr stars possess weaker winds . in figure [ wn_grid ] , we compare the predicted lyman continuum ionizing flux distribution from four 100kk wn models , in which only the low metallicity , low mass - loss rate models predicts a prodigious number of photons below the he@xmath69 edge at 228 . consequently , one expects evidence of hard ionizing radiation from wr stars ( e.g. nebular heii @xmath44686 ) solely at low metallicities . this is generally borne out by observations of hii regions associated with wr stars ( garnett et al . previous studies of metal - rich regions have claimed a low limit to the stellar mass function from indirect hii region studies at high metallicity in which wr stars were spectroscopically detected . gonzalez delgado et al . ( 2002 ) were able to reconcile a high stellar mass limit from uv spectral synthesis techniques with a soft ionizing spectrum for the metal - rich wr galaxy ngc 3049 by applying the smith , norris & crowther ( 2002 ) line blanketed grid of wr models at high metallicity . for wr stars , it has long been suspected that abundances represented the products of core nucleosynthesis , although it has taken the development of non - lte model atmospheres for these to have been empirically supported . balmer - pickering decrement studies by conti , leep & perry ( 1983 ) concluded that hydrogen was severely depleted in wr stars . a clear subtype effect regarding the hydrogen content of galactic wn stars is observed , with late - type wn stars generally showing some hydrogen ( typically @xmath7010% ) , and early - type wn stars being hydrogen - free , although exceptions do exist . this trend breaks down within the lower metallicity environment of the magellanic clouds , notably the smc ( foellmi et al 2003a ) . milky way late - type wn stars with weak emission lines denoted as ` ha ' due to intrinsic absorption lines plus the presence of hydrogen are universally h - rich with @xmath7150% ( crowther et al . 1995a ; crowther & dessart 1998 ) . non - lte analyses confirm that wn abundance patterns are consistent with material processed by the cno cycle in which these elements are used as catalysts , i.e. @xmath72 in which @xmath731% by mass is observed in milky way wn stars . carbon is highly depleted , with typically @xmath74 0.05% . oxygen suffers from fewer readily accessible line diagnostics , but probably exhibits a similarly low mass fraction as carbon ( e.g. crowther , smith & hillier 1995b ; herald , hillier & schulte - ladbeck 2001 ) . non - lte analysis of transition wn / c stars reveals elemental abundances ( e.g. @xmath74 5% , @xmath75 1% by mass ) that are in good agreement with the hypothesis that these stars are in a brief transition stage between wn and wc ( langer 1991 ; crowther , smith & willis 1995c ) . neither hydrogen nor nitrogen are detected in the spectra of wc stars . recombination line studies using theoretical coefficients for different transitions are most readily applicable to wc stars , since they show a large number of lines in their optical spectra . atomic data are most reliable for hydrogenic ions , such as civ and ovi , so early - type wc and wo stars can be studied most readily . smith & hummer ( 1988 ) suggested a trend of increasing c / he from late to early wc stars , with c / he=0.040.7 by number ( 10% @xmath76 60% ) , revealing the products of core he burning @xmath77 although significant uncertainties remain in the rate of the latter nuclear reaction . these reactions compete during helium burning to determine the ratio of carbon to oxygen at the onset of carbon burning . in reality , optical depth effects come into play , so detailed abundance determinations for all subtypes require non - lte model atmosphere analyses . koesterke & hamann ( 1995 ) indicated refined values of c / he=0.10.5 by number ( 20% @xmath76 55% ) , with no wc subtype dependence , such that spectral types are not dictated by carbon abundance , contrary to suggestions by smith & maeder ( 1991 ) . indeed , lmc wc4 stars possess similar surface abundances to milky way wc stars ( crowther et al . 2002 ) , for which the heii @xmath45412 and c iv @xmath45471 optical lines represent the primary diagnostics ( hillier 1989 ) . these recombination lines are formed at high densities of 10@xmath78 to 10@xmath47 @xmath35 at radii of 330 @xmath37 ( recall figure [ wr_ross ] ) . oxygen diagnostics in wc stars lie in the near - uv , such that derived oxygen abundances are rather unreliable unless space - based spectroscopy is available . where they have been derived , one finds @xmath79 510% for wc stars ( e.g. crowther et al . 2002 ) . core he burning in massive stars also has the effect of transforming @xmath80n ( produced in the cno cycle ) to neon and magnesium via @xmath81 and serves as the main neutron source for the s - process in massive stars . neon lines are extremely weak in the uv / optical spectrum of wc stars ( crowther et al . 2002 ) , but ground - state fine - structure lines at [ neii ] 12.8@xmath28 m and [ neiii ] 15.5@xmath28 m may be observed via mid - ir spectroscopy , as illustrated for @xmath14 vel in van der hucht et al . fine - structure wind lines are formed at hundreds of stellar radii since their critical densities are of order 10@xmath82 @xmath35 . barlow , roche & aitken ( 1988 ) came to the conclusion that neon was not greatly enhanced in @xmath14 vel with respect to the solar case ( @xmath00.1% by mass primarily in the form of @xmath83ne ) in @xmath14 vel from their analysis of fine - structure lines . this was a surprising result , since the above reaction is expected to produce @xmath02% by mass of @xmath84ne at solar metallicity . once the clumped nature of wr winds is taken into consideration , neon is found to be enhanced in @xmath14 vel and other wc stars ( e.g. dessart et al . the inferred neon mass fraction is @xmath01% ( see also crowther , morris & smith 2006a ) . meynet & maeder ( 2003 ) note that the @xmath84ne enrichment depends upon nuclear reaction rates rather than stellar models , so the remaining disagreement may suggest a problem with the relevant reaction rates . more likely , a lower metal content is inferred from the neon abundance than solar metallicity evolutionary models ( z=0.020 ) . indeed , if the solar oxygen abundance from apslund et al . ( 2004 ) is taken into account , a revised metal content of z=0.012 for the sun is impled . allowance for depletion of heavy elements due to diffusion in the 4.5 gyr old sun suggests a solar neighbourhood metallicity of z=0.014 ( meynet , private communication ) . it is likely that allowance for a reduced cno content would bring predicted and measured ne@xmath84 abundances into better agreement . wo stars are extremely c- and o - rich , as deduced from recombination analyses ( kingsburgh , barlow & storey 1995 ) , and supported by non - lte models ( crowther et al . further nucleosynthesis reactions produce alpha elements via @xmath85 producing a core which is initially dominated by @xmath86o and @xmath83ne . _ spitzer _ studies are in progress to determine neon abundances in wo stars , in order to assess whether these stars show evidence of @xmath2capture of oxygen ( in which case enhanced @xmath83ne would again dominate over @xmath84ne ) . the existence of winds in early - type stars has been established since the 1960 s , when the first rocket uv observations ( e.g. morton 1967 ) revealed the characteristic p cygni signatures of mass - loss . electron ( thompson ) scattering dominates the continuum opacity in o and wr stars , whilst the basic mechanism by which their winds are driven is the transfer of photon momentum to the stellar atmosphere through the absorption by spectral lines . the combination of a plethora of spectral lines within the same spectral region as the photospheric radiation allows for efficient driving of winds by radiation pressure ( milne 1926 ) . wind velocities can be directly measured , whilst wind density estimates rely on varying complexity of theoretical interpretation . a theoretical framework for mass - loss in normal hot , luminous stars was developed by castor , abbott & klein ( 1975 ) , known as cak theory , via line - driven radiation pressure . the wavelength of the blue edge of saturated p cygni absorption profiles provides a measure of the asymptotic wind velocity . from these wavelengths , accurate wind velocities of wr stars can readily be obtained ( prinja , barlow & howarth 1990 ; willis et al . alternatively , optical and near - ir hei p cygni profiles or mid - ir fine - structure metal lines may be used to derive reliable wind velocities ( howarth & schmutz 1992 ; eenens & williams 1994 ; dessart et al . 2000 ) . in principle , optical recombination lines of heii and c iii - iv may also be used to estimate wind velocities , since these are formed close to the asymptotic flow velocity . however , velocities obtained from spectral line modelling are preferable . for wr stars exhibiting weak winds whose lines are formed interior to the asymptotic flow velocity only lower velocity limits may be obtained . nevertheless , observational evidence suggests lower wind velocities at later subtypes by up to a factor of ten than early subtypes ( table [ wrtemp ] ) . wind velocities of lmc wn stars compare closely with milky way counterparts . unfortunately , uv spectroscopy of smc wn stars is scarce , such that one has to rely on optical emission lines for wind velocity estimates , which provide only lower limits to terminal wind velocities . the current record holder amongst non - degenerate stars for the fastest stellar wind is the galactic wo star wr93b . for it , a wind velocity of 6000 kms@xmath26 has been obtained from optical recombination lines ( drew et al . individual wo stars have now also been identified in a number of external galaxies . one observes a reduction in line width ( and so wind velocity ) for stars of progressively lower metallicity , by a factor of up to two between the milky way and ic 1613 ( crowther & hadfield 2006 ) . although numbers are small , this downward trend in wind velocity with decreasing metallicity is believed to occur for other o and wr spectral types ( e.g. kudritzki & puls 2000 ; crowther 2000 ) . the mass - loss rate relates to the velocity field @xmath87 and density @xmath88 via the equation of continuity @xmath89 for a spherical , stationary wind . wr winds may be observed at ir - mm - radio wavelengths via the free - free ( bremsstrahlung ) continuum excess caused by the stellar wind or via uv , optical or near - ir emission lines . mass - loss rates ( e.g. leitherer , chapman & koribalski 1997 ) follow from radio continuum observations using relatively simple analytical relations , under the assumption of homogeneity and spherical symmetry . the emergent radio flux @xmath90 depends on the distance to the star @xmath91 , mass - loss rate and terminal velocity as follows @xmath92 ( wright & barlow 1975 ) , where @xmath93 in the constant - velocity regime . accurate determinations of wr mass - loss rates depend upon composition , ionization balance and electron temperature at physical radii of @xmath94 . wind collisions in an interacting binary system will cause additional non - thermal ( synchrotron ) radio emission ( sect . [ synch ] ) , so care needs to be taken against overestimating mass - loss rates in this way . optical spectral lines observed in wr stars can be considered as recombination lines , although line formation is rather more complex in reality ( hillier 1988 , 1989 ) . since recombination involves the combination of ion and electron density , the strength of wind lines scales with the square of the density . this explains why only a factor of @xmath010 increase in wind density with respect to the photospheric absorption line spectrum from o supergiants produces an emission line wolf - rayet spectrum . recall the comparison of @xmath48 pup ( o4i(n)f ) to hd 96548 ( wr40 , wn8 ) in figure [ wr_ross ] . there is overwhelming evidence in favour of highly clumped winds for wr and o stars . line profiles show propagating small - scale structures or ` blobs ' , which are turbulent in nature ( e.g. moffat et al . 1988 ; lpine et al . 2000 ) . for optically thin lines , these wind structures have been investigated using radiation hydrodynamical simulations by dessart & owocki ( 2005 ) . alternatively , individual spectral lines , formed at @xmath95 , can be used to estimate volume filling factors @xmath96 in wr winds ( hillier 1991 ) . this technique permits an estimate of wind clumping factors from a comparison between line electron scattering wings ( which scale linearly with density ) and recombination lines ( density - squared ) . this technique suffers from an approximate radial density dependence and is imprecise due to severe line blending , especially in wc stars . nevertheless , fits to uv , optical and ir line profiles suggest @xmath97 . as a consequence , global wr mass - loss rates are reduced by a factor of @xmath98 relative to homogeneous models ( dm / dt @xmath99 ) . representative values are included in table [ wrtemp ] . spectroscopically derived mass - loss rates of milky way wn stars span a wide range of 10@xmath100 to 10@xmath101 yr@xmath26 . in contrast , galactic wc stars cover a much narrower range in mass - loss rate , from 10@xmath102 to 10@xmath101 yr@xmath26 . independent methods support clumping - corrected wr mass - loss rates . binary systems permit use of the variation of linear polarization with orbital phase . the modulation of linear polarization originates from thomson scattering of free electrons due to the relative motion of the companion with respect to the wr star . this technique has been applied to several wr binaries including v444 cyg ( hd 193576=wr139 , wn5+o ) by st - louis et al . ( 1993 ) and has been developed further by kurosawa , hillier & pittard ( 2002 ) using a monte carlo approach . for the case of v444 cyg , polarization results suggest a clumping factor of @xmath103 . the most likely physical explanation for the structure in wr and o star winds arises from theoretical evidence supporting an instability in radiatively - driven winds ( lucy & solomon 1971 ; owocki , castor & rybicki 1988 ) . there is a strong potential in line scattering to drive wind material with accelerations that greatly exceed the mean outward acceleration . simulations demonstrate that this instability may lead naturally to structure . such a flow is dominated by multiple shock compressions , producing relatively soft x - rays . hard x - ray fluxes from early - type stars are believed to be restricted to colliding wind binary systems ( e.g. @xmath14 vel : schild et al . 2004 ) , for which @xmath104 . we shall now consider empirical evidence in favour of metallicity - dependent wr winds . nugis , crowther & willis ( 1998 ) estimated mass - loss rates for galactic wr stars from archival radio observations , allowing for clumped winds . nugis & lamers ( 2000 ) provided empirical mass - loss scaling relations by adopting physical parameters derived from spectroscopic analysis and/or evolutionary predictions . for a combined sample of wn and wc stars , nugis & lamers ( 2000 ) obtained @xmath105 where y and z are the mass fractions of helium and metals , respectively . smith & willis ( 1983 ) compared the properties of wn stars in the lmc and milky way , concluding there was no significant differences between the wind properties of the two samples . these conclusions were supported by hamann & koesterke ( 2000 ) from detailed non - lte modelling , although a large scatter in mass - loss rates within each parent galaxy was revealed . either there is no metallicity dependence , or any differences are too subtle to be identified from the narrow metallicity range spanned by the milky way and lmc . within the milky way , most late - type stars contain hydrogen and most early - type stars do not . in contrast , early - type stars dominate wn populations in the magellanic clouds ( recall figure [ wrpop ] ) , and often contain atmospheric hydrogen ( smith , shara & moffat 1996 ; foellmi , moffat & guerrero 2003ab ) . figure [ mdot_plot ] compares the mass - loss rates of cluster or association member wn stars in the milky way with magellanic cloud counterparts . mass - loss estimates are obtained from their near - ir helium lines ( crowther 2007 , following howarth & schmutz 1992 ) . the substantial scatter in mass - loss rates is in line with the heterogeneity of line strengths within wn subtypes . stronger winds are measured for wn stars without surface hydrogen , in agreement with eqn [ nugis - lamers00 ] ) and recent results of hamann , grfener & liermann ( 2006 ) . from the figure , measured mass - loss rates of hydrogen - rich early - type wn stars in the smc ( 1/5 @xmath106 ) are 0.4 dex weaker than equivalent stars in the milky way and lmc ( 1/2 to 1 @xmath106 ) . this suggests a metallicity dependence of dm / dt @xmath107 for wn stars , with @xmath108 . the exponent is comparable to that measured from h@xmath2 observations of milky way , lmc and smc o - type stars ( mokiem et al . 2007 ) . there are two atmospheric factors which contribute to the observed trend towards earlier wn subtypes at lower metallicities ; 1 . cno compromises @xmath01.1% by mass of the solar photosphere ( asplund et al . 2004 ) versus 0.48% in the lmc and 0.24% in the smc ( russell & dopita 1990 ) . since wn stars typically exhibit cno equilibrium abundances , there is a maximum nitrogen content available in a given environment . for otherwise identical physical parameters , crowther ( 2000 ) demonstrated that a reduced nitrogen content at lower metallicity favours an earlier subtype . this is regardless of metallicity dependent mass - loss rates , and results from the abundance sensitivity of nitrogen classification lines additionally , a metallicity dependence of wn winds would enhance the trend to earlier spectral subtypes . dense wn winds at high metallicities lead to efficient recombination from high ionization stages ( e.g. n@xmath109 ) to lower ions ( e.g. n@xmath110 ) within the optical line formation regions . this would not occur so effectively for low density winds , enhancing the trend towards early - type wn stars in metal - poor environments . consequently , both effects favour predominantly late subtypes at high metallicity , and early subtypes at low metallicity , which is indeed generally observed ( fig . [ wrpop ] ) . it is well established that wc stars in the inner milky way , and indeed all metal - rich environments , possess later spectral types than those in the outer galaxy , lmc and other metal - poor environments ( figure [ wrpop ] ; hadfield et al . this observational trend led smith & maeder ( 1991 ) to suggest that early - type wc stars are richer in carbon than late - type wc stars , on the basis of tentative results from recombination line analyses . in this scenario , typical milky way wc59 stars exhibit reduced carbon abundances than wc4 counterparts in the lmc . however , quantitative analysis of wc subtypes allowing for radiative transfer effects do not support a subtype dependence of elemental abundances in wc stars ( koesterke & hamann 1995 ) , as discussed in sect [ abundances ] . if differences of carbon content are not responsible for the observed wc subtype distribution in galaxies , what is its origin ? let us consider the wc classification lines ciii @xmath45696 and civ @xmath55801 - 12 in greater detail . specifically the upper level of @xmath45696 has an alternative decay via @xmath4574 , with a branching ratio of 147:1 ( hillier 1989 ) . consequently @xmath45696 only becomes strong when @xmath4574 is optically thick , i.e. if the stellar temperature is low _ or _ the wind density is sufficiently high . from non - lte models it has been established that the temperatures of galactic wc57 stars and lmc wc4 stars are similar , such that the observed subtype distribution argues that the wind densities of galactic wc stars must be higher than the lmc stars . figure [ mdot_plot ] also compares clumping corrected mass - loss rates of wc stars in the milky way and lmc , as derived from optical studies . the galactic sample agree well with eqn [ nugis - lamers00 ] from nugis & lamers ( 2000 ) . crowther et al . ( 2002 ) obtain a similar mass - loss dependence for wc4 stars in the lmc , albeit offset by 0.25 dex . the comparison between derived lmc and solar neighbourhood wc wind properties suggests a dependence of dm / dt @xmath107 with @xmath111 . crowther et al . ( 2002 ) argued that the wc subtype distributions in the lmc and milky way resulted from this metallicity dependence . ciii @xmath45696 emission is very sensitive to mass - loss rate , so weak winds for lmc wc stars would produce negligible ciii @xmath45696 emission ( wc4 subtypes ) and strong winds interior to the solar circle would produce strong ciii @xmath45696 emission ( wc8 - 9 subtypes ) , in agreement with the observed subtype distributions . historically , it has not been clear whether radiation pressure alone is sufficient to drive the high mass - loss rates of wr stars . let us briefly review the standard castor , abbott & klein ( 1975 , hereafter cak ) theory behind radiatively driven winds before addressing the question of line driving for wr stars . pulsations have also been proposed for wr stars , as witnessed in intensive monitoring for the most photometrically variable wn8 star with the _ most _ satellite by lefvre et al . interpretation of such observations however remains ambiguous ( townsend & macdonald 2006 ; dorfi , gautschy & saio 2006 ) . the combination of plentiful line opacity in the extreme uv , where the photospheric radiation originates , allows for efficient driving of hot star winds by radiation pressure ( milne 1926 ) . in a static atmosphere , the photospheric radiation will only be efficiently absorbed or scattered in the lower layers of the atmosphere , weakening the radiative acceleration , @xmath112 , in the outer layers . in contrast , atoms within the outer layers of an expanding atmosphere see the photosphere as doppler - shifted radiation , allowing absorption of undiminished continuum photons in their line transitions ( sobolev 1960 ) . the force from optically thick lines , which provide the radiative acceleration by absorbing the photon momentum , scale with the velocity gradient . there can be at most @xmath113 thick lines , implying a so - called single - scattering limit @xmath114 castor , abbott & klein ( 1975 ) and abbott ( 1982 ) developed a self - consistent solution of the wind properties , from which one obtains a velocity ` law ' @xmath115 for which @xmath116=0.8 for o - type stars ( pauldrach , puls & kudritzki 1986 ) . @xmath112 can be written in terms of the thompson ( electron ) scattering acceleration , i.e. @xmath117 . the equation of motion can then be expressed as @xmath118 it is clear that both @xmath57 and @xmath119 need to be large for a hot star to possess a wind . in the cak approach , optically thick lines are assumed not to overlap within the wind . in reality , this is rarely true in the extreme uv where spectral lines are very tightly packed and the bulk of the line driving originates . consequently , another approach is needed for wr stars whose winds exceed the single scattering limit ( lamers & leitherer 1993 ) , namely the consideration of multiple scattering . historically , the strength of wr winds were considered to be mass dependent , but metallicity - independent ( langer 1989 ) . observational evidence now favours metallicity - dependent wr winds , with a dependence of dm / dt @xmath107 , with @xmath120 for wn stars ( sect . [ metallicity ] ) . it is established that o star winds are driven by radiation pressure , with a metallicity dependence that is similar to wn stars ( mokiem et al . consequently , the notion that wr winds are radiatively driven is observationally supported . theoretically , lucy & abbott ( 1993 ) and springmann ( 1994 ) produced monte carlo wind models for wr stars in which multiple - scattering was achieved by the presence of multiple ionization stages in the wind . however , a prescribed velocity and ionization structure was adopted in both case studies , plus the inner wind acceleration was not explained . schmutz ( 1997 ) first tackled the problem of driving wr winds from radiatively - driven winds self - consistently using a combined monte carlo and radiative transfer approach . he also introduced a means of photon - loss from the heii ly@xmath2 303 line via a bowen resonance - fluorescence mechanism . this effect led to a change in the ionization equilibrium of helium , requiring a higher stellar luminosity . the consideration of wind clumping by schmutz ( 1997 ) did succeed in providing a sufficiently strong outflow in the outer wind . photon - loss nevertheless failed to initiate the requisite powerful acceleration in the deep atmospheric layers . subsequent studies have supported the principal behind the photon - loss mechanism for wr stars , although the effect is modest ( e.g. de marco et al . 2000 ) . the next advance for the inner wind driving was by nugis & lamers ( 2002 ) whose analytical study suggested that the ( hot ) iron opacity peak at 10@xmath121 k is responsible for the observed wr mass - loss in an optically thick wind ( a cooler opacity peak exists at 10@xmath122k ) . indeed , grfener & hamann ( 2005 ) established that highly ionized fe ions ( feix - xvii ) provides the necessary opacity for initiating wr winds deep in the atmosphere for wr111 ( hd 165763=wr111 , wc5 ) . the wind acceleration due to radiation and gas pressure self - consistently matches the mechanical and gravitational acceleration in their hydrodynamical model . grfener & hamann ( 2005 ) achieved the observed terminal wind velocity by adopting an extremely low outer wind filling factor of @xmath96=0.02 . this degree of clumping is unrealistic since predicted line electron scattering wings are too weak with respect to observations . a more physical outer wind solution should be permitted by the inclusion of more complete opacities from other elements such as ne and ar . the velocity structure from the grfener & hamann ( 1995 ) hydrodynamical model closely matches a typical @xmath116=1 velocity law of the form in eqn [ velocity_law ] in the inner wind . a slower @xmath116=5 law is more appropriate for the outer wind . indeed , such a hybrid velocity structure was first proposed by hillier & miller ( 1999 ) . theoretically , both the hydrodynamical models of grfener & hamann ( 2005 ) and recent monte carlo wind models for wr stars by vink & de koter ( 2005 ) argue in favour of radiation pressure through metal lines as responsible for the observed multiple - scattering in wr winds . the critical parameter involving the development of strong outflows is the proximity of wr stars to the eddington limit , according to grfener & hamann ( 2007 ) . vink & de koter ( 2005 ) performed a multiple - scattering study of wr stars at fixed stellar temperatures and eddington parameter . a metallicity scaling of dm / dt @xmath107 with @xmath123=0.86 for 10@xmath124 was obtained . this exponent is similar to empirical wn and o star results across a more restricted metallicity range . grfener & hamann ( 2007 ) predict a decrease in the exponent or late - type wn stars at higher @xmath57 , plus reduced wind velocities at lower metallicities . vink & de koter ( 2005 ) predict that the high metal content of wc stars favour a weaker dependence with metallicity than wn stars . a mass - loss scaling with exponent @xmath123=0.66 for @xmath125 is predicted . this is consistent with the observed wc mass - loss dependence between the lmc and milky way . at low metallicity , vink & de koter ( 2005 ) predict a weak dependence of @xmath123=0.35 for @xmath126 providing atmospheric carbon and oxygen abundances are metallicity - independent . the components of a massive binary may evolve independently , as if they were single stars providing their orbital periods are sufficiently large . in contrast , an interacting or close binary system represents the case in which the more massive primary component expands to fill its roche lobe , causing mass exchange to the secondary . for an initial period of several days , the primary will reach its roche lobe whilst still on the h - core burning main sequence ( case a ) and transfer the majority of its hydrogen - rich envelope to the secondary . for initial periods of a few weeks or years , mass transfer will occur during the hydrogen - shell burning phase ( case b ) or he - shell burning ( case c ) , respectively . cases b and c are much more common than case a due to the much larger range of orbital periods sampled . according to vanbeveren , de loore & van rensbergen ( 1998 ) a common envelope will occur instead of roche lobe overflow if there is an lbv phase . close binary evolution will extend the formation of wr stars to lower initial mass , and consequently lower luminosity with respect to single star evolution ( e.g. vanbeveren et al . the observed lower mass limit to wr formation in the milky way is broadly consistent with the single star scenario ( meynet & maeder 2003 ) . therefore , either low - mass he stars are not recognised spectroscopically as wr stars , or they may be too heavily diluted by their brighter o star companions for them to be observed . one natural , albeit rare , consequence of massive close binary evolution involves the evolution of the initial primary to core - collapse , with a neutron star or black hole remnant , in which the system remains bound as a high mass x - ray binary ( hmxb , wellstein & langer 1999 ) . the ob secondary may then evolve through to the wolf - rayet phase , producing a wr plus neutron star or black hole binary . for many years , searches for such systems proved elusive , until it was discovered that cyg x3 , a 4.8 hour period x - ray bright system possessed the near - ir spectrum of a he - star ( van kerkwijk et al . 1992 ) . nevertheless , the nature of cyg x3 remains somewhat controversial . wr plus compact companion candidates have also been identified in external galaxies , ic 10 x1 ( bauer & brandt 2004 ) and ngc 300 x-1 ( carpano et al . 2007 ) . the presence of two early - type stars within a binary system naturally leads to a wind - wind interaction region . in general , details of the interaction process are investigated by complex hydrodynamics . nevertheless , the analytical approach of stevens , blondin & pollock ( 1992 ) provides a useful insight into the physics of the colliding winds . a subset of wr stars display non - thermal ( synchrotron ) radio emission , in addition to the thermal radio emission produced via free - free emission from their stellar wind . consequently , a magnetic field must be present in the winds of such stars , with relativistic electrons in the radio emitting region . shocks associated with a wind collision may act as sites for particle acceleration through the fermi mechanism ( eichler & usov 1993 ) . free electrons would undergo acceleration to relativistic velocities by crossing the shock front between the interacting stellar winds . indeed , the majority of non - thermal wr radio emitters are known binaries . for example , wr140 ( wc7+o ) is a highly eccentric system with a 7.9 year period , in which the radio flux is thermal over the majority of the orbit . between phases 0.55 and 0.95 ( where phase 0 corresponds to periastron passage ) , the radio flux increases dramatically and displays a non - thermal radio index ( williams et al . 1990 ) . one may introduce the wind momentum ratio , @xmath127 @xmath128 where the mass loss rates and wind velocities of components @xmath129 are given by @xmath130 and @xmath131 , respectively . in the simplest case of @xmath127=1 , the intersection between the winds occurs in a plane midway between the two stars . in the more likely situation of @xmath132 1 , the contact discontinuity appears as a cone wrapped around the star with the less momentum in its wind . by way of example , radio emission in the wr147 ( wn8 + b0.5 ) system has been spatially resolved into two components : thermal emission from the wn8 primary wind , plus non - thermal emission located close to the companion ( williams et al . the location of the non - thermal component is consistent with the ram pressure balance of the two stellar winds , from which a momentum ratio of @xmath133 can be obtained . for early - type stars that have reached their terminal velocities of several thousand kms@xmath26 , the post - shock plasma temperature is very high ( @xmath134 k ) . x - rays represent the main observational signature of shock - heated plasma . significantly harder x - ray fluxes are expected from massive binaries with respect to single stars . phase - locked x - ray variability is expected due to the change in opacity along the line - of - sight , or varying separation for eccentric binaries ( stevens , blondin & pollock 1992 ) . a colliding wind system in which substantial phase - locked variability has been observed with _ is @xmath14 vel ( wc8+o ) . the x - ray emission from the shock is absorbed when the opaque wind from the wr star lies in front of the o star . when the cavity around the o star crosses our line - of - sight , x - ray emission is significantly less absorbed ( willis , schild & stevens 1995 ) . the principal sources of interstellar dust are cool , high mass - losing stars , such as red giants , asymptotic giant branch stars , plus novae and supernovae . dust is observed around some massive stars , particularly lbvs with ejecta nebulae , but aside from their giant eruptions , this may be material that has been swept up by the stellar wind . the intense radiation fields of young , massive stars would be expected to prevent dust formation in their local environment . however , allen , swings & harvey ( 1972 ) identified excess ir emission in a subset of wc stars , arising from @xmath01000 k circumstellar dust . williams , van der hucht & th ( 1987 ) investigated the infrared properties of galactic wc stars , revealing persistent dust formation in some systems , or episodic formation in other cases . for a single star whose wind is homogeneous and spherically symmetric , carbon is predicted to remain singly or even doubly ionized due to high electron temperatures of @xmath010@xmath135k in the region where dust formation is observed to occur . however , the formation of graphite or more likely amorphous carbon grains requires a high density of neutral carbon close to the wc star . one clue to the origin of dust is provided by wr140 ( hd 193793 , wc7+o ) which forms dust episodically , near periastron passage . at this phase the power in the colliding winds is at its greatest ( williams et al . usov ( 1991 ) analytically showed that the wind conditions of wr140 at periastron favour a strong gas compression in the vicinity of the shock surface , providing an outflow of cold gas . it is plausible that high density , low temperature , carbon - rich material associated with the bow - shock in a colliding wind wc binary provides the necessary environment for dust formation . in contrast to episodic dust formers , persistent wc systems are rarely spectroscopic wc binaries , for which wr104 ( ve 2 - 45 , wc9 ) is the prototype identified by allen et al . spectroscopic evidence from crowther ( 1997 ) suggested the presence of an ob companion in the wr104 system when the inner wc wind was obscured by a dust cloud , analogous to r coronae borealis stars . conclusive proof of the binary nature of wr104 has been established by tuthill , monnier & danchi ( 1999 ) from high spatial resolution near - ir imaging . dust associated with wr104 forms a spatially confined stream that follows a spiral trajectory ( so - called ` pinwheel ' ) , analogous to a garden rotary sprinker . the cocoon stars after which the quintuplet cluster at the galactic centre was named have also been identified as dusty wc pinwheel stars by tuthill et al . ( 2006 ) . binarity appears to play a key role in the formation of dust in wc stars , providing the necessary high density within the shocked wind interaction region , plus shielding from the hard ionizing photons . the presence of hydrogen from the ob companion may provide the necessary chemical seeding in the otherwise hydrogen - free wc environment . alas , this possibility does have difficulties , since chemical mixing between the wc and ob winds may not occur in the immediate vicinity of the shock region . nevertheless , it is likely that all dust forming wc stars are binaries . the various inputs to stellar interior evolutionary models originate from either laboratory experiments ( e.g. opacities , nuclear reaction rates ) or astronomical observations ( e.g. mass - loss properties , rotation rates ) . indeed , mass - loss ( rather than convection ) has a dominant effect upon stellar models for the most massive stars . here we illustrate one of the potential pitfalls of this approach . according to koesterke et al . ( 1991 ) , stellar luminosities of some weak - lined early - type wn stars were unexpectedly low ( @xmath136 ) . in order to reproduce such results , plus the observed n(wr)/n(o ) ratio , meynet et al . ( 1994 ) adopted higher stellar mass - loss rates , with respect to previous empirical calibrations . improvements in non - lte models have subsequently led to higher derived stellar luminosities ( e.g. hamann , grfener & liermann 2006 ) . revised wr luminosities removed the primary motivation behind elevated mass - loss rates . indeed , allowance for wind clumping has now led to the need to reduce mass - loss rates in evolutionary models . mass - loss and rotation are intimately linked for the evolution of massive stars . stellar winds will lead to spin - down for the case of an efficient internal angular momentum transport mechanism . at solar metallicity , one anticipates rapid spin - down for very massive stars due to their strong stellar winds ( langer 1998 ) . initial rotational velocities are erased within a few million years . in contrast , initial conditions may remain preserved throughout the main sequence lifetime of o - type stars in metal - poor environments due to their weak stellar winds . discrepancies between evolutionary model predictions and a number of observed properties of high mass stars led to the incorporation of rotational mixing into interior models , following the theoretical treatment of zahn ( 1992 ) . rotational mixing reproduces some of the predictions from the high mass - loss evolutionary models of meynet et al . ( 1994 ) , for which two approaches have been developed . meynet & maeder ( 1997 ) describe the transport of angular momentum in the stellar interior through the shear and meridional instabilities . in contrast , momentum is transported radially from the core to the surface in the approach of heger et al . ( 2000 ) . rotation favours the evolution into the wr phase at earlier stages , increasing the wr lifetime . lower initial mass stars also enter the wr phase . for an assumed initial rotational velocity of 300 kms@xmath26 , the minimum initial mass star entering the wr phase is 22 @xmath1 , versus 37@xmath1 for non - rotating models at solar metallicity ( meynet & maeder 2003 ) . evolutionary models allowing for rotational mixing do predict a better agreement with the observed ratio of wr to o stars at low metallicity , the existence of intermediate wn / c stars ( though see langer 1991 ) , and the ratio of blue to red supergiants in galaxies . regarding the initial rotation velocities of massive stars , evolutionary models adopt fairly high values . observationally , @xmath137 kms@xmath26 for young ob stars in the smc cluster ngc 346 ( mokiem et al . 2006 ) , suggesting somewhat lower initial rotation rates , on average . nevertheless , lower mass limits to the formation of wr stars are predicted to lie in the range 42@xmath1 at z=0.004 ( smc ) to 21@xmath1 at z=0.04 ( m 83 ) for models allowing for such high initial rotation rates ( meynet & maeder 2005 ) . hirschi , meynet & maeder ( 2005 ) present chemical yields from rotating stellar models at solar metallicity , revealing increased c and o yields below 30@xmath1 , and higher he yields at higher initial masses . it is possible to predict the number ratio of wr to o stars for regions of constant star formation from rotating evolutionary models , weighted over the initial mass function ( imf ) . for an assumed salpeter imf slope for massive stars , the ratios predicted are indeed in much better agreement with the observed distribution at solar metallicity ( meynet & maeder 2003 ) . since the o star population is relatively imprecise , the predicted wr subtype distributions are often used instead for comparisons with observations . from figure [ wrpop ] , the solar neighbourhood wr subtype distribution contains similar numbers of wc and wn stars , with an equal number of early ( h - free ) and late ( h - rich ) wn stars . from comparison with evolutionary models , the agreement is reasonable , except for the brevity of the h - deficient wn phase in interior models at solar metallicity . this aspect has been quantified by hamann , grfener & liermann ( 2006 ) . synthetic wr populations from the meynet & maeder ( 2003 ) evolutionary tracks predict that only 20% of wn stars should be hydrogen - free , in contrast to over 50% of the observed sample . non - rotating models provide better statistics , although low luminosity early - type wn stars are absent in such synthetic populations . figure [ wcwn ] shows that the ratio of wc to wn stars is observed to increase with metallicity for nearby galaxies whose wr content has been studied in detail . one notably exception is the low - metallicity local group galaxy ic 10 ( massey & holmes 2002 ; crowther et al . the wr population of ic 10 remains controversial , since high galactic foreground extinction favours the detection of wc stars over wn stars . the preferential detection of wc stars arises because the equivalent widths of the strongest optical lines in wc stars are ( up to 100 times ) larger than those of the strongest optical lines in wn stars ( massey & johnson 1998 ) . two evolutionary model predictions are included in fig . [ wcwn ] ; ( a ) allowing for rotational mixing but without a wr metallicity scaling ( meynet & maeder 2005 ) ; ( b ) neglecting rotational mixing , although with a metallicity scaling for wr stars ( eldridge & vink 2006 ) . the latter models , in which convective overshooting is included , agree better with observations at higher metallicities . it should be emphasised that a significant wr population formed via a close binary channel is required to reproduce the observed wr / o ratio across the full metallicity range in the eldridge & vink ( 2006 ) models ( see also van bever & vanbeveren 2003 ) . a significant binary channel is not required for the meynet & maeder ( 2005 ) rotating evolutionary models . these resolve many issues with respect to earlier comparisons to observations , although some problems persist . in very metal - poor environments ( @xmath01/50 @xmath106 ) the wr phase is predicted for only the most massive single stars ( @xmath138 ) according to non - rotating models of de mello et al . nevertheless , wr stars have been observed in uv and optical spectroscopy of such metal - poor regions within izw 18 ( izotov et al . 1997 ; brown et al . 2002 ) and sbs 0335 - 052e ( papaderos et al . 2006 ) . only wc stars have been unambiguously identified spectroscopically , yet wn stars would be expected to dominate the wr population of such metal - poor regions . the strength of wn winds are believed to depend more sensitively upon metallicity than the strength of wc winds ( vink & de koter 2005 ) . therefore , wn stars may be extremely difficult to directly detect . hot weak - lined wn stars are predicted to have hard uv ionizing flux distributions , so they may be indirectly indicated via the presence of strong nebular heii @xmath44686 emission . indeed , strong nebular heii @xmath44686 is observed in izw 18 , sbs 0335 - 052e and other very metal - poor star forming galaxies . potentially large wr populations are inferred in very metal - deficient galaxies , depending upon the exact wr wind dependence upon metallicity ( crowther & hadfield 2006 ) . potentially , single star rotating evolutionary models are unable to reproduce the observed wr distribution in metal - poor galaxies . close binary evolution might represent the primary formation channel for such metal - poor wr stars , unless lbv eruptions provide the dominant method of removing the h - rich envelope at low metallicity . the end states of massive stars have been studied from a theoretical perspective by heger et al . in particular , wn and wc stars are the likely progenitors of ( at least some ) type ib and type ic core - collapse sn , respectively . this arises because , respectively hydrogen and hydrogen / helium are absent in such sne ( woosley & bloom 2006 ) . direct empirical evidence connecting single wr stars to type ib / c sn is lacking , for which lower mass interacting binaries represent alternative progenitors . one would need observations of @xmath139 wr stars in order to firmly establish a connection on a time frame of a few years , since wr lifetimes are a few 10@xmath82 yr ( meynet & maeder 2005 ) . hadfield et al . ( 2005 ) identified @xmath140 wr stars in m83 . narrow - band optical surveys of a dozen other high star - forming spiral galaxies within @xmath010 mpc would likely provide the necessary statistics . however , ground - based surveys would be hindered by the relatively low spatial resolution of 20 pc per arcsec at 5 mpc . nevertheless , the light curves of broad - lined type ic supernovae sn 1998bw , sn 2003dh and sn 2003lw suggest ejected core masses of order 10@xmath1 ( nakamura et al . 2001 ; mazzali et al . 2003 ; malesani et al . these agree rather well with the masses of lmc wc4 stars inferred by crowther et al . ( 2002 ) , if we additionally consider several solar masses which remain as a compact ( black hole ) remnant . tese supernovae were associated with long grbs , namely 980425 ( galama et al . 1998 ) , 030329 ( hjorth et al . 2003 ) , and 031203 ( malesani et al . 2004 ) , in support of the ` collapsar ' model ( macfadyen & woosley 1999 ) . indeed , wr populations have been detected in the host galaxy of grb 980425 , albeit offset from the location of the grb by several hundred pc ( hammer et al . perhaps grbs are produced by runaway wr stars , ejected from high density star clusters ( cantiello et al . such a scenario would appear to contradict fruchter et al . ( 2006 ) , regarding the location of grbs in their host galaxies . the challenge faced by both single and binary evolutionary models is for a rotating core at the point of core - collapse ( woosley & heger 2006 ) . single star models indicate that stars efficiently spin - down during either : ( a ) the slowly rotating rsg stage due to the magnetic dynamo produced by differential rotation between the rotating he - core and non - rotating h - envelope ; ( b ) the mechanical loss of angular momentum from the core during the high mass - loss wr phase . spectropolarimetry does not favour rapid rotation for milky way wc stars , although some wn stars may possess significant rotation rates . typical magnetic fields of neutron stars are of order 10@xmath47 g , so one would expect a field of 10@xmath34 g for their progenitor wolf - rayet stars . the first observational limits are now becoming available , namely @xmath14125 g for hd 50896 ( wr6 , st - louis et al . if wr stars are credible progenitors of ` magnetars ' , a subset of neutron stars that are highly magnetized ( @xmath142 g ) , the required wr magnetic field would be @xmath143 g. initial rapid rotation of a single massive star may be capable of circumventing an extended envelope via chemically homogeneous evolution ( maeder 1987 ) if mixing occurs faster than the chemical gradients from nuclear fusion . at sufficiently low metallicity , mechanical mass - loss during the wr phase would be sufficiently weak to prevent loss of significant angular momentum permitting the necessary conditions for a grb ( yoon & langer 2005 ) . alternatively , close binary evolution could cause the progenitor to spin - up due to tidal interactions or the merger of a black hole and he core within a common envelope evolution ( podsiadlowski et al . 2004 ) . both single and binary scenarios may operate . at present , the single scenario is favoured since long - soft grbs are predominantly observed in host galaxies which are fainter , more irregular and more metal - deficient than hosts of typical core - collapse supernovae ( e.g. fruchter et al . 2006 ) . of course , the ejecta strongly interact with the circumstellar material , probing the immediate vicinity of the grb itself ( van marle , langer & garca - segura 2005 ) . this provides information on the progenitor , for which one expects @xmath144 for wr winds ( eqn [ continuity ] ) . a metallicity - dependence of wr winds suggests that one would potentially expect rather different environments for the afterglows of long - duration grbs , depending upon the metallicity of the host galaxy . indeed , densities of the immediate environment of many grbs suggest values rather lower than typical solar metallicity wr winds ( chevalier , li & frasson 2004 ) . fryer , rockefeller & young ( 2006 ) estimate half of long grbs apparently occur in uniform environments , favouring a post - common envelope binary merger model . the agreement between multi - wavelength spectroscopic observations of wr stars and current non - lte model atmospheres is impressive . h - rich ( core h - burning ) wn stars are readily distinguished from classic h - deficient ( core he - burning ) wn , wc and wo stars . significant progress has been achieved in interior evolutionary models through the incorporation of rotational mixing . contemporary ( i.e. low ) mass - loss rates together with rotational mixing permits many of the observed properties of wr stars to be reproduced , at least those close to solar metallicity . 2 . empirical evidence and theoretical models both favour metallicity - dependent wr wind , providing a natural explanation to the wc ( and wo ) subtype distribution in the milky way and in external galaxies . a metallicity dependence is partially responsible for the wn subtype dependence , although the reduced nitrogen content in metal - poor galaxies also plays a role . the development of consistent radiatively - driven wr winds represents an important milestone . the predicted metallicity dependence of mass - loss rates from radiatively driven wind models agrees with observational estimates . the apparent convergence of spectroscopic and interior models suggests that we can re - assess the contribution of wr stars to the ionizing , mechanical and chemical enrichment of the ism in young star forming regions with respect to the previous annual review article on this subject ( abbott & conti 1987 ) . wr stars emit a high number of lyman continuum photons due to higher inferred stellar luminosities as a result of the inclusion of line blanketing in atmospheric models . inferred wr mass - loss rates have decreased due to overwhelming evidence in favour of clumped winds . the chemical enrichment from wr stars is believed to be significant due to an extended wc phase , as a result of rotational mixing within evolutionary models . current non - lte models rely upon a simplified clumpy wind structure , plus spherical symmetry . theoretical hydrodynamic predictions for the radial dependence of clumping in wr winds is anticipated to represent a major area of development over the next decade together with two dimensional non - lte radiative transfer codes . discrepancies persist between empirical wr populations and predictions from evolutionary models which allow for rotational mixing . metallicity dependent wr winds may improve consistency , together with the incorporation of magnetic fields . spatially resolved clusters rich in wr stars , such as westerlund 1 ( if it is genuinely co - eval ) , provide a direct means of testing evolutionary predictions . observational limits on magnetic fields within wolf - rayet stars are underway . the role of rotation in wr stars at low metallicity is of particular interest . at present , amongst the best means of establishing rapid rotation in wr stars is by measuring departures from spherical symmetry using spectropolarimetry . this technique has been applied to bright wr stars in the milky way , but wr stars within the magellanic clouds are also within the reach of ground - based 8 - 10 m instruments . the evolutionary paths leading to wr stars and core - collapse sn remain uncertain , as is the role played by lbv eruptions for the most massive stars . given the observational connection between type ic supernovae and long - soft grbs , do grbs result from low metallicity massive stars undergoing chemically homogeneous evolution , massive binaries during a common envelope phase , or runaways from dense star clusters ? the presence of wr stars in large numbers within very low metallicity galaxies appears contrary to the expectations of single star evolutionary models neglecting rotational mixing . are such stars exclusively produced by rapid rotation , close binary evolution , or via giant lbv eruptions ? 6 . most late wc stars are known to be dust formers , the universal presence of binary companions is not yet established for all dusty wc stars . in addition , it is not clear how dust grains form within such an extreme environment , the study of which merits further study . thanks to gtz grfener , john hillier , norbert langer , georges meynet , tony moffat , nathan smith , dany vanbeveren and peredur williams for useful comments on an early version of the manuscript . i wish to thank the royal society for providing financial assistance through their wonderful university research fellowship scheme for the past eight years . * narrow - band imaging : * wr candidates may be identified from narrow - band images sensitive to light from strong wr emission lines , after subtraction of images from their adjacent continua . * p cygni profiles * : spectral lines showing blue - shifted absorption plus red - shifted emission . characteristic of stellar outflows , associated with resonance lines of abundant ions ( e.g. civ 1548 - 51 ) . * non - lte : * solution of full rate equations is necessary due to intense radiation field . radiative processes dominate over collisional processes , so local thermodynamic equilibrium ( lte ) is not valid . * radiatively driven winds : * the transfer of photon momentum in the photosphere to the stellar atmosphere through absorption by ( primarily ) metal spectral lines . * monte carlo models : * a statistical approach to the radiative transfer problem , using the concept of photon packets . * clumped winds : * radiatively driven winds are intrinsically unstable , producing compressions and rarefactions in their outflows . * collapsar : * rapidly rotating wr star undergoes core - collapse to form a black hole fed by an accretion disk , whose rotational axis collimates the gamma ray burst jet . * gamma ray burst : * brief flash of gamma rays from cosmological distances . either a merger of two neutron stars ( short burst ) or a collapsar ( long burst ) . * magnetar : * highly magnetized neutron star , observationally connected with soft gamma repeaters and anomalous x - ray pulsars . * grfener & hamann 2005 : * first solution of hydrodynamics within a realistic wolf - rayet model atmosphere . * hillier 1989 * describes the extended atmospheric structure of a wc star . * van der hucht 2001 * catalogue of milky way wr stars , including cluster membership , binarity , masses . * lamers et al . 1991 * summary of key observational evidence in favour of a late stage of evolution for wr stars . * massey 2003 * review article on the broader topic of massive stars within local group galaxies . * meynet & maeder 2005 * comparison between observed wr populations in galaxies with evolutionary model predictions allowing for rotational mixing . * schaerer & vacca 1998 * describes the determination of wr and o star populations within unresolved galaxies . * williams et al . 1987 * describes various aspects of dust formation around wc stars . * grb * gamma ray burst * lbv * luminous blue variable * rsg * red supergiant * wn * nitrogen sequence wolf - rayet * wc * carbon sequence wolf - rayet * wo * oxygen sequence wolf - rayet * lte * local thermodynamic equilibrium * imf * initial mass function luminous blue variables , also known as hubble - sandage or s doradus type variables , share many characteristics of wolf - rayet stars . lbvs are widely believed to be the immediate progenitors of classic wn stars . lbvs possess powerful stellar winds , plus hydrogen depleted atmospheres , permitting similar analysis techniques to be used ( e.g. hillier et al . 2001 ) . lbvs occupy a part of the hertzsprung - russell diagram adjacent to wolf - rayet stars . typical spectral morphologies vary irregularly between a - type ( at visual maximum ) and b - type ( at visual minimum ) supergiants . examples include ag car and p cyg in the milky way , and s dor and r127 in the lmc ( e.g. humphreys & davidson 1994 ) . lbvs undergo occasional giant eruptive events signatures of which are circumstellar nebulae most notably undergone by @xmath145 car during two decades in the 19th century ( @xmath146 ejected ) . giant eruptions are believed to play a major role in the evolution of very massive stars via the removal of their hydrogen - rich envelope ( davidson & humphreys 1997 ; smith et al . 2003 ) . the origin of such huge eruptions is unclear , since line - driven radiation pressure is incapable of producing such outflows . abbott dc , 1982 . apj 263:723 abbott dc , bieging jh , churchwell e , torres av . apj 303:239 abbott dc , conti ps . ara&a 25:113 abbott dc , lucy lb . apj 288:679 allen da , swings jp , harvey pm . a&a 20:333 anderson ls . apj 339:558 asplund m , grevesse n , sauval aj , allende prieto c , kiselman d. 2004 . 417:751 barlow mj , roche pf , aitken da . mnras 232:821 barniske a , hamann w - r , grfener g. 2007 . in _ stellar evolution at low metallicity : mass - loss , explosions , cosmology _ , ed . hjglm lamers , n langer , t nugis , san francisco : asp conf series 353 , p.243 bartzakos p , moffat afj , niemela vs. 2001 . mnras 324:18 bauer fe , brandt wn . apj 601:l67 beals cs . jrasc 34:169 bohannan b , crowther pa . apj 511:374 bohannan b , walborn nr . 1989 . pasp 101:520 breysacher j , azzopardi m , testor g. 1999 . a&as 137:117 brown tm , heap sr , hubeny i , lanz t , lindler d. 2002 . apj 579:l75 cantiello m , yoon s - c , langer n , livio m. 2007 . a&a in press ( astro - ph/0702540 ) carpano s , pollock amt , wilms j , ehle m , schirmer m. 2007 . a&a 461:l9 castor ji , abbott dc , klein ri . apj 195:157 chevalier ra , li z - y , fransson c. 2004 . apj 606:369 chu y - h , treffers rr , kwitter kb . apjs 53:937 clark js , negueruela i , crowther pa , goodwin sp . 2005 . a&a 434:949 conti ps , 1976 , in _ proc . 20th colloq . lige , _ , lige : university of lige , p. 193 conti ps , garmany cd , massey p. 1989 . apj 341:113 conti ps , garmany cd , de loore c , vanbeveren d. 1983 . apj 274:302 conti ps , leep me , perry dn . apj 268:228 conti ps , massey p. 1989 . apj 337:251 conti ps , massey p , vreux j - m . 1990 . apj 354:359 crowther pa . mnras 290:l59 crowther pa a&a 356:191 crowther pa . _ stellar evolution at low metallicity : mass - loss , explosions , cosmology _ eds . hjglm lamers , n langer , t nugis , san francisco : asp conf series 353 , p.157 crowther pa , de marco o , barlow mj . 1998 . mnras 296:367 crowther pa , dessart l. 1998 . mnras 296:622 crowther pa , dessart l , hillier dj , abbott jb , fullerton aw . a&a 392:653 crowther pa , drissen l , abbott jb , royer p , smartt sj . a&a 404:483 crowther pa , fullerton aw , hillier dj , brownsberger k , dessart l , et al . 2000 . apj 538:l51 crowther pa , hadfield lj . a&a 449:711 crowther pa , hadfield lj , clark js , negueruela i , vacca wd . mnras 372 , 1407 crowther pa , morris pw , smith jd . 2006a . apj 636:1033 crowther pa , pasquali a , de marco o , schmutz w , hillier dj , de koter a. 1999 . a&a 350:1007 crowther pa , smith lj . a&a 320:500 crowther pa , smith lj , hillier dj . 1995b . a&a 302:457 crowther pa , smith lj , hillier dj , schmutz w. 1995a . a&a 293:427 crowther pa , smith lj , willis aj . 1995c . a&a 304:269 davidson k , humphreys rm . 1997 . ara&a 35:1 de koter a , schmutz w , lamers hjglm . 277:561 de marco o , schmutz w , crowther pa , hillier dj , dessart l , et al . 2000 . a&a 358:187 de mello df , schaerer d , heldmann j , leitherer c. 1998 . apj 507:199 dessart l , crowther pa , hillier dj , willis aj , morris pw , van der hucht ka . 2000 . mnras 315:407 dessart l , owocki sr a&a 432:281 dopita ma , bell jf , chu y - h , lozinskaya ta . 1994 . apjs 93:455 dorfi ea , gautschy a , saio h. 2006 . a&a 453:l35 drew je , barlow mj , unruh yc , parker qa , wesson r , et al . 2004 , mnras 351:206 eenens prj , williams pm . 1994 . mnras 269:1082 eichler d , usov v. 1993 . apj 402:271 eldridge jj , vink js . a&a 452:295 esteban c , smith lj , vilchez jm , clegg res . a&a 272:299 evans cj , howarth i d , irwin mj , burnley aw , harries tj . 2004 . mnras 353:601 figer df . nat 434:192 foellmi c , moffat afj , guerrero ma . mnras 338:360 foellmi c , moffat afj , guerrero ma . mnras 338:1025 fruchter as , levan aj , strolger l , vreeswijk pm , thorsett se , et al . nat 441:463 fryer cl , rockefeller g , young pa . 2006 . apj . 647:1269 galama tj , groot pj , van paradijs j , kouveliotou c , augusteijn t , et al . nat 395:670 gamov g. 1943 . apj 98:500 garnett dr , kennicutt rcjr , chu y - h , skillmann ed . pasp 103:850 grfener g , hamann w - r . 2005 . a&a 432:633 grfener g , hamann w - r . a&a submitted grfener g , koesterke l , hamann w - r . a&a 387:244 garca - segura g , langer n , maclow m - m . 1996b . a&a 316:133 garca - segura g , maclow m - m , langer n. 1996a . a&a 305:229 gonzalez delgado rm , leitherer c , stasinska g. , heckman tm . apj 580:824 hadfield lj , crowther pa . mnras 368:1822 hadfield lj , crowther pa , schild h , schmutz w. 2005 . a&a 439:265 hadfield lj , van dyk s , morris pw , smith jd , marston ap , et al . mnras in press ( astro - ph/0612574 ) hamann w - r , grfener g. 2004 . a&a 427:697 hamann w - r , grfener g , liermann a. 2006 . a&a 457:1015 hamann w - r , koesterke l. 2000 . a&a 360:647 hamann w - r , koesterke l , wessolowski u. 1993 . a&a 274:397 hammer f , flores h , schaerer d , dessauges - zavadsky m , le floch e , puech m. 2006 . a&a 454:103 harries tj , hillier dj , howarth i d . mnras 296:1072 heger a , langer n , woosley se . 2000 . apj 528:368 heger a , fryer cl , woosley se , langer n , hartmann dh . apj 591:288 herald je , hillier dj , schulte - ladbeck re . apj 548 , 932 hillier dj apjs 63:947 hillier dj apj 327:822 hillier dj apj 347:392 hillier dj . a&a 247:455 hillier dj , miller dl . apj 496:407 hillier dj , miller dl . apj 519:354 hillier dj , davidson k , ishibashi k , gull t. 2001 . apj 553:837 hiltner wa , schild re . apj 143:770 hirschi r , meynet g , maeder a. 2005 . a&a 433:1013 hjorth j , sollerman j , moller p , fynbo jpu , woosley se , et al . nat 423:847 homeier n , blum rd , pasquali a , conti ps , damineli a. 2003 . a&a 408:153 howarth i d , schmutz w. 1992 . a&a 261:503 humphreys rm , davidson k. 1979 . apj 232:409 humphreys rm , davidson k. 1994 . pasp 106:1025 izotov yi , foltz cb , green rf , guseva ng , thuan tx . apj 487:l37 kingsburgh rl , barlow mj . 295:171 kingsburgh rl , barlow mj , storey pj , 1995 . 295:75 koesterke l , hamann w - r . 299:503 koesterke l , hamann w - r , schmutz w , wessoloski u. 1991 . a&a 248:166 kudritzki rp , puls j. 2000 . ara&a 38:613 kurosawa r , hillier dj , pittard jm . a&a 388:957 kurosawa r , hillier dj , schulte - ladbeck re . aj 118:539 lamers hjglm , leitherer c. 1993 . apj 412:771 lamers hjglm , maeder a , schmutz w , cassinelli jp . apj 368:538 lamontagne r , moffat afj , drissen l , robert c , matthews jm . 1996 , aj 112:2227 langer n. 1989 . a&a 220:135 langer n. 1991 . a&a 248:531 langer n. 1998 . a&a 329:551 langer n , hamann w - r , lennon m , najarro f , pauldrach awa , puls j. 1994 . a&a 290:819 lefvre l , marchenko sv , moffat afj , chen an , smith sr , et al . apj 634:l109 leitherer c , chapman jm , koribalski b. 1997 . apj 481:898 lpine s , moffat afj , st - louis n , marchenko sv , dalton mj et al . 2000 , aj 120:3201 levesque em , massey p , olsen kag , plez b , josselin e , maeder a , meynet g. 2005 . apj 628:973 lucy lb , abbott dc . apj 405:738 macfadyen ai , woosley se . apj 524:262 maeder a. 1987 a&a 178 , 159 maeder a , meynet g. 1994 . a&a 287:803 maeder a , meynet g. 2001 . a&a 373:555 malesani d , tagliaferri g , chincarini g , della valle m , fugaza d , et al . apj 609 , l5 marchenko sv , moffat afj , crowther pa , chen a - n , de serres m , et al . 2004 . mnras 353:153 martins f , schaerer d , hillier dj . a&a 382:999 massey p. 1980 . apj 236:526 massey p. 1984 . apj 281:789 massey p. 2002 . apjs 141:81 massey p. 2003 . ara&a 41:15 massey p , armandroff te , conti ps . aj 92:1303 massey p. conti ps . apj 244:173 massey p , degioia - eastwood k , waterhouse e. 2001 . aj 121:1050 massey p , holmes s. 2002 . apj 580:l35 massey p , johnson o. 1998 . apj 505:793 massey p , olsen kag , parker jwm . aj 126:2362 massey p , parker jwm , garmany cd . 1989 . aj 98:1305 mazzali pa , deng j , tominaga n , maeda k , nomoto k , et al . 2003 . apj 599:l95 meynet g , maeder a. 1997 . a&a 321:465 meynet g , maeder a. 2003 . a&a 404:975 meynet g , maeder a. 2005 . a&a 429:581 meynet g , maeder a , schaller g , schaerer d , charbonnel c. 1994 . a&as 103:97 millour f , petrov rg , chesneau o , bonneau d , dessart l et al . 2007 . a&a in press ( astro - ph/0610936 ) milne ea . mnras 86:459 moffat afj , drissen l , lamontagne r , robert c. 1988 . apj 334:1038 moffat afj , seggewiss w , shara mm . apj 295:109 moffat afj , shara mm . apj 320:266 mokiem mr , de koter a , evans cj , puls j , smartt sj et al . a&a 456:1131 mokiem mr , de koter a , vink j , puls j , evans cj et al . a&a submitted morris pm , crowther pa , houck jr . apjs 154:413 morton dc . apj 147:1017 nakamura t , mazzali pa , nomoto k , iwamoto k. 2001 . apj 550:991 nugis t , crowther pa , willis aj . a&a 333:956 nugis t , lamers hjglm . a&a 360:227 nugis t , lamers hjglm . a&a 389:162 owocki sr , castor ji , rybicki gb . apj 355:914 owocki sr , cranmer sr , gayley kg . apj 472:l115 papaderos p. , izotov yi , guseva ng , thuan tx , fricke kj . 2006 . a&a 454:119 pauldrach awa , puls j , kudritzki rp . a&a 184:86 petrovic j , pols o , langer n. 2006 . a&a 450:219 podskadlowski ph , langer n , poelarends ajt , rappaport s , heger a , pfahl e. 2004 . apj 612:1044 prinja rk , barlow mj , howarth i d . 1990 . apj 361:607 rauw g , crowther pa , de becker m , gosset e , naze y , et al . 2005 . a&a 432:985 repolust t , puls j , herrero a. 2004 . a&a 415:349 russell sc , dopita ma . 1990 . apjs 74:93 schaerer d , maeder a. 1992 . a&a 263:129 schaerer d , contini t , pindao m. 1999 . a&as 136:35 schaerer d , vacca , wd . apj 497:618 schild h , crowther pa , abbott jb , schmutz w. 2003 . a&a 397:859 schild h , gdel m , mewe r , schmutz w , raassen ajj , et al . 2004 . a&a 422:177 schild h , maeder a. 1984 . a&a 136:237 schmutz w. 1997 . a&a 321:268 schmutz w , hamann w - r , wessolowski u. 1989 . a&a 210:236 schmutz w , leitherer c , gruenwald r. 1992 . pasp 104:1164 schweickhardt j , schmutz w , stahl o , szeifert th , wolf b. 1999 . a&a 347:127 shapley ae , steidel cs , pettini m. , adelberger kl apj 588:65 skinner sl , zhekov sa , gdel m , schmutz w. 2002 . apj 579:764 smith lf . 1968a . mnras 138:109 smith lf . 1968b . mnras 140:409 smith lf , hummer dg . mnras 230:511 smith lf , maeder a. 1991 . a&a 241:77 smith lf , shara mm , moffat afj . 1996 . mnras 281:163 smith lj , crowther pa , prinja rk . a&a 281:833 smith lj , norris rpf , crowther pa . 2002 . mnras 337:1309 smith lj , willis aj . 54:229 smith n , gehrz rd , hinz pm , hoffmann wf , hora jl , et al . 2003 aj 125:1458 smith n , li w , foley rj , wheeler jc , pooley d , chornock r , et al . 2007 apj submitted ( astro - ph/0612617 ) smith n , owocki sp . apj 645:l45 sobolev vv . moving envelopes of stars _ , cambridge , mass : harvard university press springmann u. 1994 . a&a 289:505 stahl o , wolf b , klare g. cassatella a , krautter j. et al . a&a 127:49 stevens ir , blondin jm , pollock amt . apj 386:265 st - louis n , moffat afj , lapointe l , efimov ys , shakhovskoj nm , fox gk , piirola v. 1993 . apj 410:342 st - louis n , chene , a - n , de la chevrotiere a , moffat afj . 2007 . in _ mass loss from stars and the evolution of stellar clusters _ a de koter , lj smith , r waters , san francisco : asp conf ser , in press torres av , conti ps , massey p. 1986 . apj 300:379 torres - dodgen av , massey p. 1988 . aj 96:1076 townsend rhd , macdonald j. 2006 . mnras 368:l57 turner dg , 1982 . in _ iau symp 99 : wolf - rayet stars : observations , physics , evolution , _ ed . cwh de loore , aj willis , reidel : dordrecht , p.57 tuthill pg , monnier jd , danchi wc . 1999 . nat 398:487 tuthill p , monnier j , tanner a , figer d , ghez a , danchi w. 2006 . sci 313:935 usov vv . mnras 252:49 vacca wd , rayner rj , cushing mc . 2007 . apj to be submitted van bever j. , vanbeveren d. 2003 . a&a 400:63 vanbeveren d , de loore c , van rensbergen w. 1998 . a&a rev 9:63 van der hucht ka . 2001 . new a 45:135 van der hucht a&a 458 , 453 van der hucht ka , morris pw , williams pm , setia gunawan dya . 1996 . a&a 315:l193 van kerkwijk mh , charles pa , geballe tr , king dl , miley gk , et al . nat 355:703 van marle aj , langer n , garca - segura g. 2005 . a&a 444:837 villar - sbaffi a , st - louis n , moffat afj , piirola v. 2006 . apj 640:995 vink js , de koter a. 2005 . a&a 442:587 von zeipel h. 1924 . mnras 84:665 walborn nr . 1990 , in _ properties of hot , luminous stars _ , ed . garmany , san francisco : asp conf ser 7 , p.23 walborn nr , morrell ni , howarth i d , crowther pa , lennon dj , et al . apj 608:1028 weaver r , mccray r , castor ji , shapiro p , moore r. 1977 . apj 218:377 wellstein s , langer n. 1999 a&a . 350:148 westerlund be . apj 145:724 williams pm , dougherty sm , davis rj , van der hucht ka , bode mf , setia gunawan dy . mnras 289:10 williams pm , van der hucht ka , pollock amt , florkowski dr , van der woerd h , wamsteker wm . 1990 . mnras 243:662 williams pm , van der hucht ka , th ps . a&a 182:91 willis aj , crowther pa , fullerton aw , hutchings jb , sonneborn g , et al . apjs 154:651 willis aj , schild h , stevens ir . 298:549 willis aj , van der hucht ka , conti ps , garmany cd . a&as 63:417 wolf cje , rayet g. 1867 . comptes rendues 65:292 woosley se , bloom js . ara&a 44:507 woosley se , heger a. 2006 . apj 637 , 914 wright ae , barlow mj mnras 170:41 yoon s - c , langer n. 2005 . a&a 443:643 zahn j - p . a&a 265:115 llllll @xmath4 & window & & sp type & reference + & & late & early & + 525 & x - ray & 10@xmath147 & 10@xmath147 & wn & skinner et al . 2002 + & & & & wc & schild et al . 2004 + @xmath148912 & extreme uv & 39% & 69% & wn , wc & smith , crowther & norris 2002 + & & & & wn & hamann & grfener 2004 + 9121200 & far - uv & 21% & 12% & wn , wc & willis et al . 2004 + 12003200 & uv , near - uv & 33% & 16% & wn , wc & willis et al . 1986 + 32007000 & visual & 5% & 2% & wn , wc & conti & massey 1989 + 70001.1@xmath28 m & far - red & 0.9% & 0.3% & wn , wc & conti , massey & vreux 1990 + & & & & wn , wc & howarth & schmutz 1992 + 15@xmath28 m & near - ir & 0.4% & 0.2% & wn , wc & vacca et al . 2007 + 530@xmath28 m & mid - ir & 0.02% & 0.01% & wn & morris et al . 2000 + & & & & wcd & van der hucht et al . 1996 + llcccccl sp & @xmath43 & @xmath149 & @xmath150 & @xmath151 & @xmath152n(lyc ) & @xmath15 & example + type & kk & @xmath153 & @xmath1yr@xmath26 & kms@xmath26 & phs@xmath26 & mag + + 3-w & 85 & 5.34 & 5.3 & 2200 & 49.2 & 3.1 & wr3 + 4-s & 85 & 5.3 & 4.9 & 1800 & 49.2 & 4.0 & wr6 + 5-w & 60 & 5.2 & 5.2 & 1500 & 49.0 & 4.0 & wr61 + 6-s & 70 & 5.2 & 4.8 & 1800 & 49.1 & 4.1 & wr134 + 7 & 50 & 5.54 & 4.8&1300 & 49.4 & 5.4 & wr84 + 8 & 45 & 5.38 & 4.7&1000 & 49.1 & 5.5 & wr40 + 9 & 32 & 5.7 & 4.8 & 700 & 48.9 & 6.7 & wr105 + + 6 ha & 45 & 6.18 & 5.0 & 2500 & 49.9 & 6.8 & wr24 + 9 ha & 35 & 5.86 & 4.8&1300 & 49.4 & 7.1 & wr108 + + ( wo ) & ( 150 ) & ( 5.22 ) & ( 5.0 ) & ( 4100 ) & ( 49.0 ) & ( 2.8 ) & ( bat123 ) + ( 4 ) & ( 90 ) & ( 5.54 ) & ( 4.6 ) & ( 2750 ) & ( 49.4 ) & ( 4.5 ) & ( bat52 ) + 5 & 85 & 5.1 & 4.9 & 2200 & 48.9 & 3.6 & wr111 + 6 & 80 & 5.06 & 4.9 & 2200 & 48.9 & 3.6 & wr154 + 7 & 75 & 5.34 & 4.7 & 2200 & 49.1 & 4.5 & wr90 + 8 & 65 & 5.14 & 5.0 & 1700 & 49.0 & 4.0 & wr135 + 9 & 50 & 4.94 & 5.0 & 1200 & 48.6 & 4.6 & wr103 + Abstract:
[ "the striking broad emission line spectroscopic appearance of wolf - rayet ( wr ) stars has long defied analysis , due to the extreme physical conditions within their line and continuum forming regions . recently , model atmosphere studies have advanced sufficiently to enable the determination of stellar temperatures , luminosities , abundances , ionizing fluxes and wind properties . the observed distributions of nitrogen ( wn ) and carbon ( wc ) sequence wr stars in the milky way and in nearby star forming galaxies are discussed ; these imply lower limits to progenitor masses of @xmath025 , 40 , 75 @xmath1 for hydrogen - depleted ( he - burning ) wn , wc , and h - rich ( h - burning ) wn stars , respectively . wr stars in massive star binaries permit studies of wind - wind interactions and dust formation in wc systems . they also show that wr stars have typical masses of 1025@xmath1 , extending up to 80@xmath1 for h - rich wn stars . theoretical and observational evidence that wr winds depend on metallicity is presented , with implications for evolutionary models , ionizing fluxes , and the role of wr stars within the context of core - collapse supernovae and long - duration gamma ray bursts . epsf.tex psfig.sty stars : wolf - rayet ; stars : fundamental parameters ; stars : evolution ; stars : abundances" ]
20,957
20,957
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the resonant excitation by coherent optical radiation of an electronic transition in a semiconductor , e.g. a valence- to conduction - band excitation , creates a quantum - mechanical coherent superposition of the initial and final states of the transition , called optical polarization . the non - linear optical properties of this coherent superposition , together with its time evolution , can be used to provide a sensitive measurement of many fundamental parameters of the semiconductor material @xcite including elastic and inelastic scattering , energy level splittings between nearly degenerate states , energy relaxation , as well as associated information such as land g - factors and band - mixing . in general , non - linear laser spectroscopy is a very established and well understood means to probe these phenomena @xcite . however , the description of the non - linear optical response of a semiconductor crystal can be considerably more complex than for simple isolated and non - interacting atoms @xcite . this is particularly true for the case of the ultrafast optical spectroscopy used for the study of the sub - picosecond dynamics of photoexcited carriers in bulk systems as well as in semiconductor heterostructures @xcite . the life - time of the coherent quantum - mechanical superposition generated by an ultrafast laser excitation , called `` dephasing time '' , determines the typical time - scale on which coherent phenomena can be observed . such dephasing time reflects the role played by the various `` incoherent '' , i.e. phase - breaking , mechanisms in destroying the phase coherence induced by the laser photoexcitation . since semiconductors are characterized by very short electron - hole dephasing times , of the order of few hundreds of femtoseconds @xcite , coherent phenomena manifest themselves only through ultrafast optical experiments with sub - picosecond time resolutions @xcite . on this time - scale , the ultrafast evolution of photoexcited electron - hole pairs will reflect the strong coupling between coherent and incoherent dynamics , thus providing invaluable information on the non - equilibrium relaxation processes occurring in the semiconductor , e.g. carrier - carrier and carrier - phonon scattering . the aim of this paper is to review the basic aspects related to coherent phenomena in semiconductors . in particular , we will focus on the ultrafast coherent vs. incoherent carrier dynamics as well as on coulomb - correlation effects in photoexcited semiconductors . the paper is organized as follows . in the remainder of this section , after a brief historical account of coherent experiments in solids , we will try to gain more insight into the concept of coherence by introducing a simplified description of the light - matter interaction in terms of a two - level model . in section [ s.tb ] we will discuss the theoretical approach commonly used for a realistic description of both coherent and incoherent phenomena in various semiconductor structures , e.g. bulk systems , semiconductor superlattices , quantum wells and wires . section [ s.bulk ] deals with ultrafast carrier photoexcitation and relaxation in bulk semiconductors ; in particular , we will discuss the dominant role played by coherence on the carrier photogeneration process . in section [ s.sl ] we will review and discuss typical field - induced phenomena in superlattices , namely bloch oscillations and wannier - stark localization , as well as their dephasing dynamics . section [ s.qwr ] is devoted to the analysis of the coherent optical response of quasi - one - dimensional systems ; more specifically , we will discuss the strong modifications induced by coulomb correlation on the linear and non - linear optical spectra of realistic quantum - wire structures . finally , in section [ s.suco ] we will summarize and draw some conclusions . coherent phenomena in atomic and molecular systems have been investigated for a long time @xcite . the first spin echo experiment @xcite was performed in 1950 on protons in a water solution of fe@xmath0 ions . pulses in the radio frequency range were generated by means of a gated oscillator with pulse widths between 20 @xmath1s and a few milliseconds . with these pulses dephasing times of the order of 10 ms have been measured . in the 1960s echo experiments were brought into the visible range @xcite . a q - switched ruby laser produced pulses of approximately 10 ns duration which were used to observe photon echoes from ruby . in this case the dephasing times were of the order of 100 ns . as already pointed out , for the observation of any coherent dynamics the pulse width has to be shorter than the typical dephasing time . since in semiconductors electron - hole dephasing times are much shorter they are in the range of a few picoseconds down to some femtoseconds , coherent experiments in semiconductors had to wait until the development of suitable lasers able to generate sub - picosecond pulses . the physical phenomena governing the ultrafast carrier dynamics in photoexcited semiconductors can be divided into two classes : _ coherent phenomena _ , i.e. phenomena related to the quantum - mechanical phase coherence induced by the laser photoexcitation , and _ incoherent phenomena _ , i.e. phenomena induced by the various phase - breaking scattering mechanisms . the above classification in terms of coherent and incoherent phenomena is not purely academic ; it corresponds to rather different experimental techniques for the investigation of these two different regimes . from an historical point of view , the optical spectroscopy in semiconductors started with the analysis of relatively slow incoherent phenomena ( compared to the electron - hole dephasing time - scale ) . the investigation of nonequilibrium carriers started with the analysis of the incoherent energy - relaxation processes in the late 1960s using cw - lasers @xcite . in the 1970s pulse sources for the study of photoexcited carriers became available @xcite and this initiated time - resolved studies of the energy - relaxation process . many experiments based on different techniques have been performed @xcite : band - to - band luminescence @xcite which monitors the product of electron and hole distribution functions , band - to - acceptor luminescence @xcite which provides information on the electron distribution functions only , and pump - and - probe measurements @xcite where the measured differential transmission is proportional to the sum of electron and hole distribution functions . the theoretical analysis of these relaxation phenomena is commonly based on the semiclassical boltzmann theory . the boltzmann equations for both electron and hole distribution functions are commonly solved by means of semiclassical monte carlo simulations @xcite . in addition to the analysis of incoherent energy - relaxation processes , the ultrafast optical spectroscopy has allowed the investigation of coherent phenomena . as already pointed out , a coherent laser field creates , in addition to a non - equilibrium carrier distribution , a coherent polarization . the investigation of the coherent dynamics in semiconductors started in the 1980s . different aspects have been investigated @xcite : the optical stark effect @xcite , the dephasing of free carriers @xcite and excitons @xcite , quantum beats related to various types of level splittings @xcite , charge oscillations in double - quantum - well systems @xcite and superlattices @xcite , many - particle effects @xcite , and the emission of coherent thz radiation @xcite . these experiments can not be analyzed within the framework of the boltzmann equation . the reason is that this coherent polarization reflects a well - defined phase relation between electrons and holes , which is neglected within the semiclassical boltzmann theory . any proper description requires a quantum - mechanical treatment where , in addition to the distribution functions of electrons and holes , also the interband polarization is taken into account as an independent variable . several approaches have been used in the literature @xcite : bogoliubov transformations @xcite , nonequilibrium green s functions @xcite , band - edge equations based on the real - space density matrix @xcite , and the density matrix formalism in momentum space @xcite . during the last decade the time resolution has been further improved down to few tens of femtoseconds @xcite . on such extremely short time - scale coherent effects can no longer be neglected and are found to play a dominant role also for the case of typical incoherent measurements such as time - resolved and time - integrated luminescence . in such conditions , the carrier dynamics is the result of a strong interplay between coherent and incoherent phenomena . therefore , the traditional separation between coherent and incoherent approaches for the theoretical investigation of photoexcited semiconductors is no longer valid . what is needed is a comprehensive theoretical framework able to describe on the same kinetic level both classes of phenomena as well as their mutual coupling . to this purpose , a generalized monte carlo method for the analysis of both coherent and incoherent phenomena has been recently proposed @xcite . the spirit of the method is to combine the advantages of the conventional monte carlo approach @xcite in treating the incoherent , i.e. phase - breaking , dynamics with the strength of a quantum - kinetic approach in describing coherent phenomena @xcite . in particular , the coherent contributions are evaluated by means of a direct numerical integration while the incoherent ones are `` sampled '' by means of a conventional monte carlo simulation in the three - dimensional @xmath2-space . this theoretical approach has ben applied successfully to the analysis of various ultrafast optical experiments , e.g. four - wave - mixing studies of many - body effects in bulk gaas @xcite and luminescence studies of the hot - carrier photogeneration process @xcite . in order to clarify the concept of phase coherence , let us consider the simplest physical model for the description of light - matter interaction , i.e. an optically driven two - level system @xcite . within a two - level picture , a ground state @xmath3 with energy @xmath4 and an excited state @xmath5 with energy @xmath6 are mutually coupled by a driving force , e.g. an external field , and/or by their mutual interaction , e.g. coulomb correlation . the two - level - system hamiltonian @xmath7 is the sum of a free - level contribution @xmath8 and of a coupling term @xmath9 here , the usual second - quantization picture in terms of creation ( @xmath10 ) and destruction ( @xmath11 ) operators has been introduced @xcite . the two terms forming the coupling hamiltonian @xmath12 will induce transitions from state @xmath3 to @xmath5 and vice versa according to the coupling constant @xmath13 . as a starting point , let us consider a single - electron system . in the absence of interlevel coupling ( @xmath14 ) , we have two stationary states , @xmath15 ( @xmath16 being the vacuum state ) , corresponding to a single electron in level @xmath3 or @xmath5 , respectively . on the contrary , in the presence of interlevel coupling , the state of the system is , in general , a linear superposition of the non - interacting states in equation ( [ eq1.4 ] ) : @xmath17 whose coefficients obey the following equations of motion : @xmath18 again , we see that in the absence of interlevel coupling ( @xmath19 ) there is no time variation of the coefficients , i.e. if the system is prepared in state @xmath20 or @xmath21 it will remain in such eigenstate . on the contrary , the interlevel coupling induces a time variation of the coefficients . the above two - level model provides the simplest description of light - matter interaction in atomic and molecular systems @xcite as well as in solids @xcite . the coupling term in equation ( [ eq1.3 ] ) has the same structure of a field - dipole interaction hamiltonian and the driving force @xmath22 can be regarded as a coherent light field . we will now consider two limiting cases : the ultrashort- and continuous - excitation regimes . an ultrashort optical excitation can be described in terms of a delta - like light pulse : @xmath23 . in this case , the equations of motion ( [ eq1.6 ] ) can be solved analytically : due to this excitation , the two - level system will undergo an instantaneous transition from its ground state @xmath24 to the excited state @xmath25 , with @xmath26 . therefore , after the pulse the system will remain in the excited state @xmath27 which is a coherent quantum - mechanical superposition of the two non - interacting states . in addition to a finite occupation probability @xmath28 of the excited state , there exists a well defined phase coherence between the ground- and the excited - state contributions , i.e. a part from their amplitudes , the coefficients @xmath29 and @xmath30 differ in phase by @xmath31 . this is what is generally meant by optically induced phase coherence . let us now consider a continuous optical excitation resonant with our two - level system : @xmath32 with @xmath33 . also for this case , equations ( [ eq1.6 ] ) can be solved analytically . in particular , for the initial condition at @xmath34 given by the ground state @xmath24 , the solution is given by @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the so - called rabi frequency . compared to the previous case , the continuous excitation gives rise to a periodic population and depopulation of the excited state according to @xmath37 . this purely coherent phenomenon is known as `` rabi - oscillation regime '' . as for the previous case , the excited state in equation ( [ eq1.8 ] ) reflects a well - defined optically - induced phase coherence . as mentioned above , the interlevel - coupling hamiltonian in equation ( [ eq1.3 ] ) may also describe , in addition to an optical excitation , some interlevel coupling due , e.g. to coulomb interaction . also in this case , in the presence of this interlevel coupling the quantum state of the system will result in a coherent superposition of the two stationary states in ( [ eq1.4 ] ) . again , this coupling will induce a well - defined phase coherence between the two levels . from the above considerations we see that coherent phenomena can be divided into two basic classes : _ optically - induced _ and _ coulomb - induced _ phenomena . in order to describe the optical response of an electron gas within a semiconductor crystal , the above analysis , based on a single two - level system , has to be replaced by a statistical - ensemble approach , i.e. a description based on a collection of independent two - level systems . any statistical ensemble of quantum systems is properly described by its single - particle density matrix @xcite @xmath38 where @xmath39 denotes a generic set of quantum numbers . its diagonal elements @xmath40 provide the average occupation numbers while the non - diagonal terms describe the degree of phase coherence between states @xmath39 and @xmath41 . for the case of our two - level system , @xmath42 reduces to a two - by - two matrix : the diagonal elements @xmath43 and @xmath44 describe , respectively , the average occupation of levels @xmath3 and @xmath5 , while the non - diagonal terms @xmath45 and @xmath46 reflect the average degree of phase coherence between the ground and the excited state . starting from the heisenberg equations of motion for the creation and destruction operators , i.e. @xmath47 \ , \qquad i\hbar { d\over dt } a^ { } _ n = [ a^ { } _ n,{\bf h}]\ , \ ] ] we obtain the following equations of motion for the above density - matrix elements : @xmath48 they are known as optical bloch equations @xcite in analogy with the equations first derived by bloch @xcite for the spin systems . this statistical - ensemble description reduces to the previous one for the case of a so called `` pure state '' , i.e. the case in which all the two - level systems forming the ensemble are in the same quantum - mechanical state @xmath49 . in this case , the above set of kinetic equations and the equations of motion ( [ eq1.6 ] ) are totally equivalent . however , as we will discuss in section [ s.tb ] , the density - matrix approach introduced so far allows , in addition to the study of coherent phenomena , the analysis of incoherent phenomena , which is not possible within a simple schrdinger - equation formalism . the optical bloch equations ( [ eq1.10 ] ) provide the simplest description of light - matter interaction . let us consider again the case of a continuous optical excitation resonant with our two - level system : @xmath32 . if we choose as initial condition at time @xmath34 the state @xmath50 , the solution of the above optical bloch equations is given by : @xmath51\ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath52 . as for the case of a single two - level system , the above solution describes a rabi - oscillation regime . in particular , the interlevel density - matrix element @xmath53 originates from the superposition of the two frequency components @xmath54 and @xmath55 . they differ from @xmath56 by the rabi frequency @xmath57 . such modification of the two - level frequency @xmath56 due to its coupling with the external field is known as `` rabi splitting '' @xcite . if we now rewrite the interlevel density - matrix element @xmath53 in ( [ eq1.12 ] ) as @xmath58 we see that , a part from the quantum - mechanical phase factor corresponding to the energy separation @xmath33 , its amplitude exhibits rabi oscillations according to @xmath59 . more specifically , we obtain : @xmath60 i.e. the quantity @xmath61 is proportional to the product of the two occupation numbers , thus reflecting the total ( or macroscopic ) dipole moment of the two - level system at time @xmath62 . this elucidates the link between optically - induced phase coherence and polarization : a coherent optical excitation gives rise to a coherent quantum - mechanical superposition of the two states which results in a macroscopic polarization of the system . such polarization field is fully described by the non - diagonal matrix element @xmath53 in ( [ eq1.12 ] ) . the above simplified description of light - matter interaction neglects any kind of incoherent , i.e. phase - breaking , phenomena . as we will see in section [ s.tb ] , such dephasing processes will lead to a decay of the interband polarization @xmath53 , thus destroying the optically induced phase coherence in the carrier system . as a final remark , let us discuss the concept of phase coherence in connection with the choice of representation . on the basis of the density - matrix formalism considered so far , the phase coherence is described by the non - diagonal density - matrix elements @xmath42 in ( [ eq1.9 ] ) . however , this separation in _ diagonal _ and _ non - diagonal _ terms is clearly representation dependent : what is diagonal in a given basis is in general not diagonal in a different basis and vice versa . if one considers , as basis set , the eigenstates of the total hamiltonian @xmath63 ( which includes the external driving force ) , the density matrix @xmath64 in ( [ eq1.9 ] ) is always diagonal , i.e. no phase coherence . thus , in order to speak of phase coherence , we need to regard the total hamiltonian @xmath63 as the sum of the system hamiltonian @xmath65 plus a driving - force term @xmath12 ( see equation ( [ eq1.1 ] ) ) . provided such separation between _ system of interest _ and _ driving force _ , the non - diagonal density - matrix elements within the representation given by the eigenstates of @xmath65 will describe the degree of coherence induced in the system by the driving force @xmath12 . two typical cases , discussed respectively in sections [ s.sl ] and [ s.qwr ] , may help in clarifying the meaning of coherence . the first case is that of a semiconductor superlattice in the presence of a constant and homogeneous electric field : as we will see , within the wannier - stark representation the bloch - oscillation dynamics is the result of phase coherence between the various wannier - stark states ; on the contrary , within the bloch representation the same phenomenon is purely described in terms of carrier populations , i.e. no off - diagonal density - matrix elements . the second case is that of coulomb - induced phase coherence : within a free - particle representation , even at the simplest hartree - fock level , coulomb interaction induces phase coherence between free - carrier states . this is clearly not the case within an exciton basis , where the density matrix is diagonal . in this section we will review in a systematic way the basic ideas used in the theoretical analysis of ultrafast carrier dynamics in semiconductors . the approach we are going to present is based on the density - matrix formalism introduced in section [ ss.moc ] . in order to study the optical and transport properties of semiconductor bulk and heterostructures , let us consider a gas of carriers in a crystal under the action of an applied electromagnetic field . the carriers will experience their mutual interaction as well as the interaction with the phonon modes of the crystal . such physical system can be described by the following hamiltonian : @xmath66 the first term describes the noninteracting - carrier system in the presence of the external electromagnetic field while the second one refers to the free - phonon system . the last three terms describe many - body contributions : they refer , respectively , to carrier - carrier , carrier - phonon , and phonon - phonon interactions . in order to discuss their explicit form , let us introduce the usual second - quantization field operators @xmath67 and @xmath68 . they describe , respectively , the creation and the destruction of a carrier in @xmath69 . in terms of the above field operators the carrier hamiltonian @xmath70 can be written as @xmath71 { \bf \psi}({\bf r})\ .\ ] ] here , @xmath72 denotes the periodic potential due to the perfect crystal while @xmath73 and @xmath74 denote , respectively , the vector and scalar potentials corresponding to the external electromagnetic field . since we are interested in the electrooptical properties as well as in the ultrafast dynamics of photoexcited carriers , the electromagnetic field acting on the crystal and the corresponding electromagnetic potentials will be the sum of two different contributions : the high - frequency laser field responsible for the ultrafast optical excitation and the additional electromagnetic field acting on the photoexcited carriers on a longer time - scale . more specifically , by denoting with the labels @xmath75 and @xmath76 these two contributions , we can write @xmath77 and recalling that @xmath78 we have @xmath79 equation ( [ eq4 ] ) , which gives the electromagnetic fields in terms of the corresponding vector and scalar potentials , reflects the well known gauge freedom : there is an infinite number of possible combinations of @xmath80 and @xmath81 which give rise to the same electromagnetic field @xmath82 . we will use such freedom of choice for the laser field ( term @xmath75 ) : we assume a homogeneous ( space - independent ) laser field @xmath83 fully described by the scalar potential @xmath84 this assumption , which corresponds to the well known dipole approximation , is well justified as long as the space - scale of interest is small compared to the light wavelength . the explicit form of the laser field considered here is @xmath85 where @xmath86 is the amplitude of the light field and @xmath56 denotes its central frequency . with this particular choice of the electromagnetic potentials describing the laser field , the hamiltonian in ( [ eq2 ] ) can be rewritten as @xmath87 where @xmath88 { \bf \psi}({\bf r})\ ] ] describes the carrier system in the crystal under the action of the electromagnetic field @xmath76 only , while @xmath89 describes the carrier - light ( cl ) interaction due to the laser photoexcitation . in analogy with the carrier system , by denoting with @xmath90 and @xmath91 the creation and destruction operators for a phonon of mode @xmath92 and wavevector @xmath93 , the free - phonon hamiltonian takes the form @xmath94 where @xmath95 is the dispersion relation for the phonon mode @xmath92 . let us now discuss the explicit form of the many - body contributions . the carrier - carrier interaction is described by the two - body hamiltonian @xmath96 where @xmath97 denotes the coulomb potential . let us now introduce the carrier - phonon interaction hamiltonian @xmath98 where @xmath99\ ] ] is the electrostatic phonon potential induced by the lattice vibrations . here , the explicit form of the coupling function @xmath100 depends on the particular phonon mode @xmath92 ( acoustic , optical , etc . ) as well as on the coupling mechanism considered ( deformation potential , polar coupling , etc . ) . let us finally discuss the phonon - phonon contribution @xmath101 . the free - phonon hamiltonian @xmath102 in ( [ eq11 ] ) , which describes a system of noninteracting phonons , by definition accounts only for the harmonic part of the lattice potential . however , non - harmonic contributions of the interatomic potential can play an important role in determining the lattice dynamics in highly excited systems @xcite , since they are responsible for the decay of optical phonons into phonons of lower frequency . in our second - quantization picture , these non - harmonic contributions can be described in terms of a phonon - phonon interaction which induces , in general , transitions between free - phonon states . here , we will not discuss the explicit form of the phonon - phonon hamiltonian @xmath101 responsible for such a decay . we will simply assume that such phonon - phonon interaction is so efficient to maintain the phonon system in thermal equilibrium . this corresponds to neglecting hot - phonon effects @xcite . it is well known that the coordinate representation used so far is not the most convenient one in describing the electron dynamics within a periodic crystal . in general , it is more convenient to employ the representation given by the eigenstates of the noninteracting - carrier hamiltonian or a part of it since it automatically accounts for some of the symmetries of the system . for the moment we will simply consider an orthonormal basis set @xmath103 without specifying which part of the hamiltonian is diagonal in such representation this will allow us to write down equations valid in any quantum - mechanical representation . since the noninteracting - carrier hamiltonian is , in general , a function of time , also the basis functions @xmath104 may be time - dependent . here , the label @xmath39 denotes , in general , a set of discrete and/or continuous quantum numbers . in the absence of electromagnetic field , the above wavefunctions will correspond to the well known bloch states of the crystal and the index @xmath39 will reduce to the wavevector @xmath2 plus the band ( or subband ) index @xmath105 . in the presence of a homogeneous magnetic field the eigenfunctions @xmath104 may instead correspond to landau states . finally , for the case of a constant and homogeneous electric field , there exist two equivalent representations : the accelerated bloch states and the wannier - stark picture . such equivalence results to be of crucial importance in understanding the relationship between bloch oscillations and wannier - stark localization and , for this reason , it will be discussed in more detail in section [ ss.qmp ] . let us now reconsider the system hamiltonian introduced so far in terms of such @xmath104 representation . as a starting point , we may expand the second - quantization field operators in terms of the new wavefunctions : @xmath106 the above expansion defines the new set of second - quantization operators @xmath107 and @xmath108 ; they describe , respectively , the creation and destruction of a carrier in state @xmath39 . for the case of a semiconductor structure ( the only one considered here ) , the energy spectrum of the noninteracting - carrier hamiltonian ( [ eq9 ] ) or a part of it is always characterized by two well - separated energy regions : the valence and the conduction band . also in the presence of an applied electromagnetic field , the periodic lattice potential @xmath109 gives rise to a large energy gap . therefore , we deal with two energetically well - separated regions , which suggests the introduction of the usual electron - hole picture . this corresponds to a separation of the set of states @xmath110 into conduction states @xmath111 and valence states @xmath112 . thus , also the creation ( destruction ) operators @xmath107 ( @xmath108 ) introduced in equation ( [ eq15 ] ) will be divided into creation ( destruction ) electron and hole operators : @xmath113 ( @xmath114 ) and @xmath115 ( @xmath116 ) . in terms of the new electron - hole picture , the expansion ( [ eq15 ] ) is given by : @xmath117 { \bf \psi}^\dagger({\bf r } ) = & & \sum_i \phi^{e * } _ i({\bf r } ) c^\dagger_i + \sum_j \phi^h_j({\bf r } ) d^ { } _ j \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] if we now insert the above expansion into equation ( [ eq9 ] ) , the noninteracting - carrier hamiltonian takes the form @xmath118 where @xmath119 \phi^{e / h}_{l'}({\bf r})\ ] ] are just the matrix elements of the hamiltonian in the @xmath120-representation . the @xmath121 sign refers , respectively , to electrons and holes while @xmath122 denotes the conduction - band edge . here , we neglect any valence - to - conduction band coupling due to the external electromagnetic field and vice versa . this is well fulfilled for the systems and field - regimes we are going to discuss in this paper . as already pointed out , the above hamiltonian may be time - dependent . we will discuss this aspect in the following section , where we will derive our set of kinetic equations . let us now write in terms of our electron - hole representation the carrier - light interaction hamiltonian ( [ eq10 ] ) : @xmath123\ .\ ] ] the above expression has been obtained within the well known rotating - wave approximation @xcite by neglecting intraband transitions , absent for the case of optical excitations . here , @xmath124 denotes the optical dipole matrix element between states @xmath125 and @xmath126 . similarly , the carrier - carrier hamiltonian ( [ eq12 ] ) can be rewritten as : @xmath127 where @xmath128 are the coulomb matrix elements within our @xmath120-representation . the first two terms describe the repulsive electron - electron and hole - hole interaction while the last one describes the attractive electron - hole interaction . here , we neglect terms that do not conserve the number of electron - hole pairs , i.e. impact - ionization and auger - recombination processes @xcite , as well as the interband exchange interaction . this monopole - monopole approximation is justified as long as the exciton binding energy is small compared to the energy gap . finally , let us rewrite the carrier - phonon interaction hamiltonian introduced in equation ( [ eq13 ] ) : @xmath129 \nonumber \\ & & - \sum\limits_{jj',{\bf q}\lambda } \left [ g^h_{jj',{\bf q}\lambda } d^\dagger_j b^ { } _ { { \bf q}\lambda } d^ { } _ { j ' } + g^{h * } _ { jj',{\bf q}\lambda } d^\dagger_{j ' } b^\dagger_{{\bf q}\lambda } d^ { } _ j \right]\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath130 in equation ( [ eq22 ] ) we can clearly recognize four different contributions corresponding to electron and hole phonon absorption and emission . our kinetic description of the ultrafast carrier dynamics in semiconductors is based on the density - matrix formalism introduced in section [ ss.moc ] . since this approach has been reviewed and discussed in several papers @xcite and text - books @xcite , here we will simply recall in our notation the kinetic equations relevant for the analysis of carrier dynamics in semiconductor heterostructures , generalizing the approach presented in @xcite to the case of a time - dependent quantum - mechanical representation . the set of kinetic variables is the same considered in @xcite . given our electron - hole representation @xmath131 , we will consider the intraband electron and hole single - particle density matrices @xmath132 as well as the corresponding interband density matrix @xmath133 here , the diagonal elements @xmath134 and @xmath135 correspond to the electron and hole distribution functions of the boltzmann theory while the non - diagonal terms describe intraband polarizations . on the contrary , the interband density - matrix elements @xmath136 describe interband ( or optical ) polarizations . in order to derive the set of kinetic equations , i.e. the equations of motion for the above kinetic variables , the standard procedure starts by deriving the equations of motion for the electron and hole operators introduced in ( [ eq16 ] ) : @xmath137 by applying the heisenberg equation of motion for the field operator @xmath138 , i.e. @xmath139\ , \ ] ] it is easy to obtain the following equations of motion : @xmath140 + \frac{1}{i\hbar}\sum_{i ' } z^e_{ii ' } c^ { } _ { i ' } \nonumber \\[1ex ] \frac{d}{dt } d^ { } _ j = & & \frac{1}{i\hbar } \left[d^ { } _ j,{\bf h}\right ] + \frac{1}{i\hbar}\sum_{j ' } z^h_{jj ' } d^ { } _ { j'}\\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath141 as for the case of equation ( [ eq17 ] ) , here we neglect again valence - to - conduction band coupling and vice versa . compared to the more conventional heisenberg equations of motion , they contain an extra - term , the last one . it accounts for the possible time dependence of our @xmath120-representation which will induce transitions between different states according to the matrix elements @xmath142 . by combining the above equations of motion with the definitions of the kinetic variables in ( [ eq24]-[eq25 ] ) , the resulting set of kinetic equations can be schematically written as : @xmath143 \frac{d}{dt } f^h_{j_1j_2 } = & & \frac{d}{dt } f^h_{j_1j_2}\biggl|_{\bf h } + \frac{d}{dt } f^h_{j_1j_2}\biggl|_\phi \nonumber \\[1ex ] \frac{d}{dt } p^ { } _ { j_1i_1 } = & & \frac{d}{dt } p^ { } _ { j_1i_1}\biggl|_{\bf h } + \frac{d}{dt } p^ { } _ { j_1i_1}\biggl|_\phi \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] they exhibit the same structure of the equations of motion ( [ eq28 ] ) for the electron and hole creation and destruction operators : a first term induced by the system hamiltonian @xmath63 ( which does not account for the time variation of the basis states ) and a second one induced by the time dependence of the basis functions @xmath120 . let us start discussing this second term , whose explicit form is : @xmath144 f^e_{i_3i_4 } \nonumber \\[1ex ] \frac{d}{dt } f^h_{j_1j_2}\biggl|_\phi = & & \frac{1}{i\hbar } \sum\limits_{j_3j_4}\left[z^h_{j_2j_4}\delta_{j_1j_3 } - z^h_{j_3j_1}\delta_{j_2j_4 } \right ] f^h_{j_3j_4 } \nonumber \\[1ex ] \frac{d}{dt } p^ { } _ { j_1i_1}\biggl|_\phi = & & \frac{1}{i\hbar } \sum\limits_{i_2j_2}\left[z^h_{j_1j_2}\delta_{i_1i_2 } + z^e_{i_1i_2}\delta_{j_1j_2 } \right ] p^ { } _ { j_2i_2 } \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] as we will see in section [ ss.qmp ] , these contributions play a central role for the description of zener tunneling within the vector - potential representation . let us now come to the first term . this , in turn , is the sum of different contributions , corresponding to the various parts of the hamiltonian . the total hamiltonian can be regarded as the sum of two terms , a single - particle contribution plus a many - body one : @xmath145 the explicit form of the time evolution due to the single - particle hamiltonian @xmath146 ( non - interacting carriers plus carrier - light interaction plus free phonons ) is given by : @xmath147 f^e_{i_3i_4 } \nonumber \\ & & + \sum\limits_{j_1}\left[u_{i_2j_1 } p^*_{j_1i_1 } -u^*_{i_1j_1 } p^ { } _ { j_1i_2}\right ] \bigg\ } \nonumber \\ \frac{d}{dt } f^h_{j_1j_2}\biggl|_{sp } = & & \frac{1}{i\hbar } \bigg\ { \sum\limits_{j_3j_4}\left[\epsilon^h_{j_2j_4}\delta_{j_1j_3 } - \epsilon^h_{j_3j_1}\delta_{j_2j_4 } \right ] f^h_{j_3j_4 } \nonumber \\ & & + \sum\limits_{i_1}\left[u_{i_1j_2 } p^*_{j_1i_1 } -u^*_{i_1j_1 } p^ { } _ { j_2i_1 } \right ] \bigg\ } \nonumber \\ \frac{d}{dt } p^ { } _ { j_1i_1}\biggl|_{sp } = & & \frac{1}{i\hbar } \bigg\ { \sum\limits_{i_2j_2}\left[\epsilon^h_{j_1j_2}\delta_{i_1i_2 } + \epsilon^e_{i_1i_2}\delta_{j_1j_2 } \right ] p^ { } _ { j_2i_2 } \nonumber \\ & & + \sum\limits_{i_2j_2 } u^ { } _ { i_2j_2 } \left[\delta_{i_1i_2}\delta_{j_1j_2 } - f^e_{i_2i_1}\delta_{j_1j_2 } - f^h_{j_2j_1}\delta_{i_1i_2 } \right ] \bigg\}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath148 . this is a closed set of equations , which is a consequence of the single - particle nature of @xmath146 . in addition , we stress that the structure of the two contributions entering equation ( [ eq30 ] ) is very similar : one can include the contribution ( [ eq31 ] ) into ( [ eq33 ] ) by replacing @xmath149 with @xmath150 . let us finally discuss the contributions due to the many - body part of the hamiltonian : carrier - carrier and carrier - phonon interactions ( the phonon - phonon one is not explicitly considered here ) . as discussed in @xcite , for both interaction mechanisms one can derive a hierarchy of equations involving higher - order density matrices . in order to close such equations with respect to our set of kinetic variables , approximations are needed . the lowest - order contributions to our equations of motion are given by first - order terms in the many - body hamiltonian : hartree - fock level . since we will neglect coherent - phonon states , the only hartree - fock contributions will come from carrier - carrier interaction . they simply result in a renormalization @xmath151 of the single - particle energy matrices @xmath152 as well as in a renormalization @xmath153 of the external field @xmath154 . we stress that the hartree - fock approximation , which consists in factorizing average values of four - point operators into products of two density matrices , is independent from the quantum - mechanical picture . it is then clear that the above kinetic equations are valid in any quantum - mechanical representation . all the contributions to the system dynamics discussed so far describe a fully coherent dynamics , i.e. no scattering processes . in order to treat incoherent phenomena , e.g. energy relaxation and dephasing , one has to go one step further in the perturbation expansion taking into account also second - order contributions ( in the perturbation hamiltonian @xmath155 ) . the derivation of these higher - order contributions , discussed in @xcite , will not be repeated here . again , in order to obtain a closed set of equations ( with respect to our set of kinetic variables ( [ eq24]-[eq25 ] ) ) additional approximations are needed , namely the mean - field and markov approximations . as for the hartree - fock case , the mean - field approximation allows to write the various higher - order density matrices as products of single - particle ones . the markov approximation allows to eliminate the additional higher - order kinetic variables , e.g. phonon - assisted density matrices , providing a closed set of equations still local in time , i.e. no memory effects @xcite . this last approximation is not performed in the quantum - kinetic theory discussed in @xcite where , in addition to our single - particle variables , one considers two - particle @xcite and phonon - assisted @xcite density matrices . while the mean - field approximation is representation - independent , this is unfortunately not the case for the markov limit . this clearly implies that the validity of the markov approximation is strictly related to the quantum - mechanical representation considered . the above kinetic description , based on intra- and interband density matrices , allows us to evaluate any single - particle quantity . in particular , for the analysis of the ultrafast carrier dynamics in photoexcited semiconductors two physical quantities play a central role : the intra- and interband total ( or macroscopic ) polarizations : @xmath156 where @xmath157 and @xmath158 denote , respectively , the intra- and interband dipole matrix elements in our @xmath120-representation . the time derivative of the intraband polarization @xmath159 describes the radiation field induced by the bloch - oscillation dynamics ( which for a superlattice structure is in the terahertz range ) while the fourier transform of the interband ( or optical ) polarization @xmath160 provides the linear and non - linear optical response of the system . in this section , we will discuss the dominant role played by optically - induced phase coherence on the ultrafast generation and relaxation of photoexcited carriers in bulk semiconductors . in particular , we will compare the description based on the theoretical approach discussed above with the more conventional picture based on the boltzmann theory . in order to study the ultrafast carrier dynamics in bulk systems , let us consider a two - band semiconductor model . for the case of a homogeneous system , the only relevant terms of the single - particle density matrix in @xmath2-space are the diagonal ones . this property , due to the translational symmetry of the hamiltonian , reduces the set of kinetic variables ( [ eq24]-[eq25 ] ) to the following electron and hole distribution functions ( intraband density - matrix elements ) @xmath161 together with the corresponding polarizations ( interband density - matrix elements ) has been applied to our plane - wave states . in particular , due to the charge - conjugation symmetry , the hole states are still labeled in terms of the corresponding valence - electron states , i.e. @xmath162 . ] @xmath163 the explicit form of the kinetic equations ( [ eq30 ] ) within the above two - band picture is given by @xmath164 \nonumber \\ \frac{d}{dt } f_{\bf k}^h = & & g_{\bf -k}(t ) - \sum_{\bf k ' } \left [ w^h_{\bf k'k } f_{\bf k}^h \left ( 1 - f_{\bf k'}^h \right ) - w^h_{\bf kk ' } f_{\bf k'}^h \left ( 1 - f_{\bf k}^h \right ) \right ] \nonumber \\ \frac{d}{dt } p_{\bf k}^ { } = & & \frac{1}{i\hbar}\left [ \left ( \epsilon_{\bf k}^e + \epsilon_{\bf -k}^h \right ) p_{\bf k}^ { } + u_{\bf k}\left ( 1 - f_{\bf k}^e - f_{\bf -k}^h \right ) \right ] \nonumber \\ & & { } - \sum_{\bf k ' } \left [ w^p_{\bf k'k } p_{\bf k}^ { } - w^p_{\bf kk ' } p_{\bf k'}^ { } \right ] \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] with the generation rate @xmath165 \ .\ ] ] here , the incoherent contributions are treated within the usual markov limit as described in @xcite . within such approximation scheme , the incoherent contributions to the polarization dynamics exhibit the same structure as for the distribution functions in terms of the following in- and out - scattering rates @xmath166 \ , \ ] ] where @xmath167 are the usual scattering rates of the semiclassical boltzmann theory . this boltzmann - like structure of the scattering term in the polarization equation is the starting point of the generalized monte carlo method discussed in section [ s.int ] @xcite . the above kinetic equations are known as _ semiconductor bloch equations _ ( sbe ) ) reduce to the optical bloch equations introduced in section [ ss.moc ] , i.e. they describe a collection of independent ( non - interacting ) two - level systems . ] . as we can see , here the carrier photogeneration is a two - step process : the external field @xmath154 induces a coherent polarization @xmath53 which , in turn , generates electron - hole pairs via its coupling with the field according to equation ( [ eq4bulk ] ) . the generation rate is thus determined by the interband polarization @xmath168 which , in turn , is influenced by the various density - dependent scattering mechanisms , e.g. carrier - carrier processes . therefore , in contrast to the semiclassical case discussed below , the generation rate within the sbe model is clearly density dependent . the conventional boltzmann model is obtained from the above sbe by performing an adiabatic elimination of the interband polarization @xmath168 , i.e. by inserting a formal solution of the polarization equation into the generation rate ( [ eq4bulk ] ) and then performing a markov limit with respect to the electron and hole distribution functions @xcite . this corresponds to assuming that the carrier distributions are slowly - varying functions on the time - scale of the laser photoexcitation , i.e. the carrier generation and relaxation are treated as independent processes . within such approximation scheme , except for phase - space - filling effects , the generation rate entering the semiclassical boltzmann equations ( be ) for electrons and holes is fully determined by the temporal and spectral characteristics of the laser pulse . contrary to the sbe case , all effects related to the optically induced phase coherence and to its temporal decay are neglected . in order to compare the different models of carrier dynamics in photoexcited semiconductors , let us review some simulated experiments @xcite based on the generalized monte carlo solution of the sbe @xcite discussed in section [ s.int ] . the corresponding be has been solved , for comparison , by a standard ensemble monte carlo ( emc ) simulation @xcite . both be and sbe have been solved numerically for the case of gaas bulk excited by a 150 fs laser pulse . in figure [ fig1bulk ] the generation rate at different times as obtained from the sbe is plotted as a function of the carrier wave vector for three different densities . at the lowest density the behavior is essentially the same as in the case without carrier - carrier scattering : energy - time uncertainty leads to an initially very broad generation rate ; with increasing time the line narrows and , in the tails , exhibits negative parts due to a stimulated recombination of carriers initially generated off - resonance @xcite . after the pulse , the distribution function of the generated carriers is in good agreement with the be result . scattering processes destroy the coherence between electrons and holes which is necessary for the stimulated recombination processes . as a consequence , with increasing density the negative tails are strongly reduced and the generation remains broad for all times resulting in a much broader carrier distribution than in the be case . hot carrier luminescence has proven to be a powerful technique to study the ultrafast dynamics of photoexcited carriers in semiconductors @xcite . in band - to - acceptor ( ba ) luminescence experiments @xcite , due to their high sensitivity , carrier densities as low as several @xmath169 @xmath170 have been reached . thus , the transition between a dynamics dominated by carrier - phonon scattering to a dynamics dominated by carrier - carrier scattering ( with its consequences for the generation process discussed above ) is experimentally accessible . in the ba luminescence experiment reviewed here @xcite , a 3 @xmath1 m thick gaas layer doped with be acceptors of a concentration of @xmath171 @xmath170 is excited at a photon energy of 1.73 ev by transform limited 150 fs pulses from a mode - locked ti : sapphire laser . time - integrated luminescence spectra are recorded @xcite . the right column of figure [ fig2bulk ] shows measured ba luminescence spectra for three different values of the carrier density . at low density we observe an initial peak of the generated carriers ( marked bold ) and pronounced replicas due to the emission of an integer number of optical phonons . with increasing density the peaks become broader and at the highest density only a slight structure related to the phonons is still visible . these measured spectra are compared with corresponding simulated experiments based on the be and sbe models @xcite ( left and middle column in figure [ fig2bulk ] ) . we find several pronounced differences between the two models . in the semiclassical model the unrelaxed peak is clearly visible up to the highest density in contrast to the coherent model , where , in agreement with the experiment , this peak is strongly broadened . at the higher densities the semiclassical spectra exhibit an increase in the broadening of subsequent replicas which is not present in the bloch - model calculations as well as in the experimental results . to illustrate this difference quantitatively , in figure [ fig3bulk ] we have plotted the full width at half maximum ( fwhm ) of the three highest peaks in the spectra . from the semiclassical model we obtain a strong increase in the density dependence of subsequent peaks . this behavior can be easily understood : due to the emission time of an optical phonon of about @xmath172 fs , the carriers populate subsequent replicas at increasing times and , therefore , the efficiency of carrier - carrier scattering processes in broadening the peaks increases . however , the measured spectra exhibit a different behavior which is quantitatively reproduced by the sbe model : already the unrelaxed peak exhibits a strong increase with increasing density and the density dependence of all replicas is approximately the same . the reason is that the broadening of the generation process as discussed above obviously dominates over the broadening due to subsequent scattering processes . as discussed in @xcite , this is due to the fact that the generation process is strongly influenced by the decay of the interband polarization which , in turn , is due to electron plus hole scattering , while the broadening of the electron distribution during the relaxation process is due to electron scattering only . the above theoretical and experimental analysis constitutes a clear demonstration of the importance of dephasing processes for the analysis of luminescence spectra . the density dependence of the spectra in the interesting transition region between carrier - phonon and carrier - carrier dominated dynamics can only be explained by a coherent modeling of the carrier generation including the dynamics of the interband polarization . the main mechanism determining the width of the peaks is the broadening of the generation rate . it can be shown that for band - to - acceptor spectra the broadening of the recombination process , neglected in the present model , plays a minor role @xcite . however , for band - to - band spectra also this phenomenon should be taken into account . for the case discussed above the background due to band - to - band luminescence has been found to be of negligible importance @xcite . ever since the initial applications of quantum mechanics to the dynamics of electrons in solids , the analysis of bloch electrons moving in a homogeneous electric field has been of central importance . by employing semiclassical arguments , in 1928 bloch @xcite demonstrated that , a wave packet given by a superposition of single - band states peaked about some quasimomentum , @xmath173 , moves with a group velocity given by the gradient of the energy - band function with respect to the quasimomentum and that the rate of change of the quasimomentum is proportional to the applied field @xmath174 . this is often referred to as the `` acceleration theorem '' : @xmath175 thus , in the absence of interband tunneling and scattering processes , the quasimomentum of a bloch electron in a homogeneous and static electric field will be uniformly accelerated into the next brillouin zone in a repeated - zone scheme ( or equivalently undergoes an umklapp process back in to the first zone ) . the corresponding motion of the bloch electron through the periodic energy - band structure , shown in figure [ fig1sl ] , is called `` bloch oscillation '' ; it is characterized by an oscillation period @xmath176 , where @xmath177 denotes the lattice periodicity in the field direction . there are two mechanisms impeding a fully periodic motion : interband tunneling and scattering processes . interband tunneling is an intricate problem and still at the center of a continuing debate . early calculations of the tunneling probability into other bands in which the electric field is represented by a time - independent scalar potential were made by zener @xcite using a wentzel - kramers - brillouin generalization of bloch functions , by houston @xcite using accelerated bloch states ( houston states ) , and subsequently by kane @xcite and argyres @xcite who employed the crystal - momentum representation . their calculations lead to the conclusion that the tunneling rate per bloch period is much less than unity for electric fields up to @xmath178v / cm for typical band parameters corresponding to elemental or compound semiconductors . despite the apparent agreement among these calculations , the validity of employing the crystal - momentum representation or houston functions to describe electrons moving in a non - periodic ( crystal plus external field ) potential has been disputed . the starting point of the controversy was the original paper by wannier @xcite . he pointed out that , due to the translational symmetry of the crystal potential , if @xmath179 is an eigenfunction of the scalar - potential hamiltonian ( corresponding to the perfect crystal plus the external field ) with eigenvalue @xmath149 , then any @xmath180 is also an eigenfunction with eigenvalue @xmath181 , where @xmath182 is the so - called wannier - stark splitting ( @xmath183 being the primitive lattice vector along the field direction ) . he concluded that the translational symmetry of the crystal gives rise to a discrete energy spectrum , the so - called wannier - stark ladder . the states corresponding to these equidistantly spaced levels are localized states , as schematically shown in figure [ fig2sl ] for the case of a semiconductor superlattice . the existence of such energy quantization was disputed by zak @xcite , who pointed out that for the case of an infinite crystal the scalar potential @xmath184 is not bounded , which implies a continuous energy spectrum . thus , the main point of the controversy was related to the existence ( or absence ) of wannier - stark ladders . more precisely , the point was to decide if interband tunneling ( neglected in the original calculation by wannier @xcite ) is so strong to destroy the wannier - stark energy quantization ( and the corresponding bloch oscillations ) or not . it is only during the last decade that this controversy came to an end . from a theoretical point of view , most of the formal problems related to the non - periodic nature of the scalar potential ( superimposed to the periodic crystal potential ) were finally removed by using a vector - potential representation of the applied field @xcite . within such vector - potential picture , upper boundaries for the interband tunneling probability have been established at a rigorous level , which show that an electron may execute a number of bloch oscillations before tunneling out of the band @xcite , in qualitatively good agreement with the earlier predictions of zener and kane @xcite . the second mechanism impeding a fully periodic motion is scattering by phonons , impurities , etc . ( see figure [ fig1sl ] ) . this results in lifetimes shorter than the bloch period @xmath185 for all reasonable values of the electric field , so that bloch oscillations should not be observable in conventional solids . in superlattices , however , the situation is much more favourable because of the smaller bloch period @xmath185 resulting from the small width of the mini - brillouin zone in the field direction @xcite . indeed , the existence of wannier - stark ladders as well as bloch oscillations in superlattices has been confirmed by a number of recent experiments @xcite . the photoluminescence and photocurrent measurements of the biased gaas / gaalas superlattices performed by mendez and coworkers @xcite , together with the electroluminescence experiments by voisin and coworkers @xcite , provided the earliest evidence of the field - induced wannier - stark ladders in superlattices . a few years later , feldmann and coworkers @xcite were able to measure bloch oscillations in the time domain through a four - wave - mixing experiment originally suggested by von plessen and thomas @xcite . a detailed analysis of the bloch oscillations in the four - wave - mixing signal ( which reflects the interband dynamics ) has been also performed by leo and coworkers @xcite . in addition to the above interband - polarization analysis , bloch oscillations have been also detected by monitoring the intraband polarization which , in turn , is reflected by anisotropic changes in the refractive index @xcite . measurements based on transmittive electrooptic sampling ( teos ) have been performed by dekorsy and coworkers @xcite . finally bloch oscillations were recently measured through a direct detection of the terahertz ( thz ) radiation in semiconductor superlattices @xcite . let us now apply the theoretical approach presented in section [ s.tb ] to the case of a semiconductor superlattice in the presence of an uniform ( space - independent ) electric field . the non - interacting carriers within the superlattice crystal will then be described by the hamiltonian @xmath186 in equation ( [ eq9 ] ) , where now the electrodynamic potentials @xmath187 and @xmath188 ( in the following simply denoted with @xmath80 and @xmath81 ) correspond to a homogeneous electric field @xmath189 . as pointed out in section [ ss.ps ] , the natural quantum - mechanical representation is given by the eigenstates of this hamiltonian : @xmath190 \phi_n({\bf r } ) = \epsilon_n \phi_n({\bf r})\ .\ ] ] however , due to the gauge freedom discussed in section [ ss.ps ] , there is an infinite number of possible combinations of @xmath80 and @xmath81 and therefore of possible hamiltonians which describe the same homogeneous electric field @xmath191 . in particular , one can identify two independent choices : the vector - potential gauge @xmath192 and the scalar - potential gauge @xmath193 as shown in @xcite , the two independent choices correspond , respectively , to the well known bloch - oscillation and wannier - stark pictures . they simply reflect two equivalent quantum - mechanical representations and , therefore , any physical phenomenon can be described in both pictures . more specifically , within the vector - potential picture ( [ eq3sl ] ) , the eigenfunctions @xmath104 in ( [ eq2sl ] ) are the so - called accelerated bloch states ( or houston states ) @xcite . as discussed in @xcite , such time dependent representation constitutes the natural basis for the description of bloch oscillations , i.e. it provides a rigorous quantum - mechanical derivation of the acceleration theorem ( [ eq1sl ] ) , thus showing that this is not a simple semiclassical result . ) and the corresponding bloch - oscillation dynamics are usually regarded as a semiclassical result compared to the wannier - stark picture . on the contrary , they correspond to two different fully quantum - mechanical pictures . ] within such representation , bloch oscillations are fully described by the diagonal terms of the intraband density matrix ( [ eq24 ] ) ( semiclassical distribution functions ) . therefore , non - diagonal elements , describing phase - coherence between different bloch states , do not contribute to the intraminiband dynamics . however , they are of crucial importance for the description of interminiband dynamics , i.e. field - induced zener tunneling , which in this bloch - state representation originates from the time variation of our basis states ( see equation ( [ eq31 ] ) ) . on the contrary , within the scalar - potential picture ( [ eq4sl ] ) , the eigenfunctions @xmath104 in ( [ eq2sl ] ) are the well - known wannier - stark states @xcite . contrary to the previous bloch picture , within such representation the intraminiband bloch dynamics originates from a quantum interference between different wannier - stark states , thus involving non - diagonal elements of the intraband density matrix ( [ eq24 ] ) . in this section , we will review recent simulated experiments of the ultrafast carrier dynamics in semiconductor superlattices @xcite . they are based on a generalized monte carlo solution @xcite of the set of kinetic equations ( so - called semiconductor bloch equations ) derived in section [ ss.kd ] . in this case , the bloch representation discussed in section [ ss.qmp ] has been employed limiting the set of interband density - matrix elements in ( [ eq25 ] ) to the diagonal ones , i.e. @xmath194 . in addition , incoherent scattering processes have been treated within the usual markov limit as discussed in @xcite . within such approximation scheme , the explicit form of the kinetic equations ( [ eq30 ] ) coincides with the sbe ( [ eq3 ] ) ( obtained for the bulk case ) @xcite , provided we replace the wavevector @xmath2 with @xmath195 , @xmath105 being the superlattice miniband index . in the simulated experiments reviewed here the following superlattice model has been employed : the energy dispersion and the corresponding wavefunctions along the growth direction ( @xmath196 ) are computed within the well known kronig - penney model @xcite , while for the in - plane direction ( @xmath197 ) an effective - mass model has been used . starting from these three - dimensional wavefunctions @xmath198 , the various carrier - carrier as well as carrier - phonon matrix elements are numerically computed ( see equations ( [ eq21 ] ) and ( [ eq23 ] ) ) . they are , in general , functions of the various miniband indices and depend separately on @xmath196 and @xmath197 , thus fully reflecting the anisotropic nature of the superlattice structure . only coupling to gaas bulk phonons has been considered . this , of course , is a simplifying approximation which neglects any superlattice effect on the phonon dispersion , such as confinement of optical modes in the wells and in the barriers , and the presence of interface modes @xcite . however , while these modifications have important consequences for phonon spectroscopies ( like raman scattering ) , they are far less decisive for transport phenomena . we will start discussing the scattering - induced damping of bloch oscillations . in particular , we will show that in the low - density limit this damping is mainly determined by optical - phonon scattering @xcite while at high densities the main mechanism responsible for the suppression of bloch oscillations is found to be carrier - carrier scattering @xcite . this bloch - oscillation analysis in the time domain is also confirmed by its counterpart in the frequency domain . as pointed out in section [ ss.qmp ] , the presence of bloch oscillations , due to a negligible scattering dynamics , should correspond to wannier - stark energy quantization . this is confirmed by the simulated optical - absorption spectra , which clearly show the presence of the field - induced wannier - stark ladders@xcite . all the simulated experiments presented in this section refer to the superlattice structure considered in ref . @xcite : @xmath199 gaas wells and @xmath200 al@xmath201ga@xmath202as barriers . for such a structure there has been experimental evidence for a thz - emission from bloch oscillations @xcite . in the first set of simulated experiments an initial distribution of photoexcited carriers ( electron - hole pairs ) is generated by a @xmath203 fs gaussian laser pulse in resonance with the first - miniband exciton ( @xmath204 mev ) . the strength of the applied electric field is assumed to be @xmath205 kv / cm , which corresponds to a bloch period @xmath176 of about @xmath206 fs . in the low - density limit ( corresponding to a weak laser excitation ) , incoherent scattering processes do not alter the bloch - oscillation dynamics . this is due to the following reasons : in agreement with recent experimental @xcite and theoretical @xcite investigations , for superlattices characterized by a miniband width smaller than the lo - phonon energy as for the structure considered here and for laser excitations close to the band gap , at low temperature carrier - phonon scattering is not permitted . moreover , in this low - density regime carrier - carrier scattering plays no role : due to the quasi - elastic nature of coulomb collisions , in the low - density limit the majority of the scattering processes is characterized by a very small momentum transfer ; as a consequence , the momentum relaxation along the growth direction is negligible . as a result , on this picosecond time - scale the carrier system exhibits a coherent bloch - oscillation dynamics , i.e. a negligible scattering - induced dephasing . this can be clearly seen from the time evolution of the carrier distribution as a function of @xmath196 ( i.e. averaged over @xmath207 ) shown in figure [ fig3sl ] . during the laser photoexcitation ( @xmath34 ) the carriers are generated around @xmath208 , where the transitions are close to resonance with the laser excitation . according to the acceleration theorem ( [ eq1sl ] ) , the electrons are then shifted in @xmath2-space . when the carriers reach the border of the first brillouin zone they are bragg reflected . after about @xmath206 fs , corresponding to the bloch period @xmath185 , the carriers have completed one oscillation in @xmath2-space . as expected , the carriers execute bloch oscillations without loosing the synchronism of their motion by scattering . this is again shown in figure [ fig3sl ] , where we have plotted : ( b ) the mean kinetic energy , ( c ) the current , and ( d ) its time derivative which is proportional to the emitted far field , i.e. the thz - radiation . ( it can be shown that , by neglecting zener tunneling , the intraband polarization @xmath159 in equation ( [ eq37 ] ) is proportional to the current . ) all these three quantities exhibit oscillations characterized by the same bloch period @xmath185 . due to the finite width of the carrier distribution in @xmath2-space ( see figure [ fig3sl](a ) ) , the amplitude of the oscillations of the kinetic energy is somewhat smaller than the miniband width . since for this excitation condition the scattering - induced dephasing is negligible , the oscillations of the current are symmetric around zero , which implies that the time average of the current is equal to zero , i.e. no dissipation . as already pointed out , this ideal bloch - oscillation regime is typical of a laser excitation close to gap in the low - density limit . let us now discuss , still at low densities , the case of a laser photoexcitation high in the band . figure [ fig4sl](a ) shows the thz - signal as obtained from a set of simulated experiments corresponding to different laser excitations @xcite . the different traces correspond to the emitted thz - signal for increasing excitation energies . we clearly notice the presence of bloch oscillations in all cases . however , the oscillation amplitude and decay ( effective damping ) is excitation - dependent . for the case of a laser excitation resonant with the first - miniband exciton considered above ( see figure [ fig3sl ] ) , we have a strong thz - signal . the amplitude of the signal decreases when the excitation energy is increased . additionally , there are also some small changes in the phase of the oscillations , which are induced by the electron - lo phonon scattering . when the laser energy comes into resonance with the transitions between the second electron and hole minibands ( @xmath209 mev ) , the amplitude of the thz - signal increases again . the corresponding thz - transients show an initial part , which is strongly damped and some oscillations for longer times that are much less damped . for a better understanding of these results , we show in figure [ fig4sl](b ) the individual thz - signals , originating from the two electron and two heavy - hole minibands for the excitation with @xmath210 mev . the bloch oscillations performed by the electrons within the second miniband are strongly damped due to intra- and interminiband lo - phonon scattering processes @xcite . since the width of this second miniband ( @xmath211 mev ) is somewhat larger than the lo - phonon energy , also intraminiband scattering is possible , whenever the electrons are accelerated into the high - energy region of the miniband . the thz - signal originating from electrons within the first miniband shows an oscillatory behavior with a small amplitude and a phase which is determined by the time the electrons need to relax down to the bottom of the band . at the same time , the holes in both minibands exhibit undamped bloch oscillations , since the minibands are so close in energy that for these excitation conditions no lo - phonon emission can occur . the analysis shows that at early times the thz - signal is mainly determined by the electrons within the second miniband . at later times the observed signal is due to heavy holes and electrons within the first miniband . the above theoretical analysis closely resembles experimental observations obtained for a superlattice structure very similar to the one modelled here @xcite . in these experiments , evidence for thz - emission from bloch oscillations has been reported . for some excitation conditions these oscillations are associated with resonant excitation of the second miniband . the general behavior of the magnitude of the signals , the oscillations and the damping are close to the results shown in figure [ fig4sl ] . finally , in order to study the density dependence of the bloch - oscillation damping , let us go back to the case of laser excitations close to gap . figure [ fig5sl](a ) shows the total ( electrons plus holes ) thz - radiation as a function of time for three different carrier densities . with increasing carrier density , carrier - carrier scattering becomes more and more important : due to coulomb screening , the momentum transfer in a carrier - carrier scattering increases ( its typical value being comparable with the screening wavevector ) . this can be seen in figure [ fig5sl](a ) , where for increasing carrier densities we realize an increasing damping of the thz - signal . however , also for the highest carrier density considered here we deal with a damping time of the order of @xmath212 fs , which is much larger than the typical dephasing time , i.e. the decay time of the interband polarization , associated with carrier - carrier scattering . the dephasing time is typically investigated by means of four - wave - mixing ( fwm ) measurements and such multi - pulse experiments can be simulated as well @xcite . from a theoretical point of view , a qualitative estimate of the dephasing time is given by the decay time of the `` incoherently summed '' polarization ( isp ) @xcite . figure [ fig5sl](b ) shows such isp as a function of time for the same three carrier densities of figure [ fig5sl](a ) . as expected , the decay times are always much smaller than the corresponding damping times of the thz - signals ( note the different time - scale in figures [ fig5sl](a ) and ( b ) ) . this difference , discussed in more detail in @xcite , can be understood as follows : the fast decay times of figure [ fig5sl](b ) reflect the interband dephasing , i.e. the sum of the electron and hole scattering rates . in particular , for the coulomb interaction this means the sum of electron - electron , electron - hole , and hole - hole scattering . as for the case of bulk gaas discussed in section [ s.bulk ] , this last contribution is known to dominate and determines the dephasing time - scale . on the other hand , the total thz - radiation in figure [ fig5sl](a ) is the sum of the electron and hole contributions . however , due to the small value of the hole miniband width compared to the electron one , the electron contribution will dominate . this means that the thz damping in figure [ fig5sl](a ) mainly reflects the damping of the electron contribution . this decay , in turn , reflects the intraband dephasing of electrons which is due to electron - electron and electron - hole scattering only , i.e. no hole - hole contributions . from the above analysis we can conclude that the decay time of the thz - radiation due to carrier - carrier scattering differs considerably from the corresponding dephasing times obtained from a fwm experiment : the first one is a measurement of the intraband dephasing while the second one reflects the interband dephasing . for the case of bulk semiconductors , where the broadening of the photoexcited carrier distribution is mainly determined by the decay of the interband polarization ( interband dephasing ) while the subsequent energy broadening of the electron distribution is due to electron scattering only ( intraband dephasing ) ( see figure [ fig2bulk ] ) . ] let us now discuss the frequency - domain counterpart of the bloch - oscillation picture considered so far . similar to what happens in the time domain , for sufficiently high electric fields , i.e. when the bloch period @xmath176 becomes smaller than the dephasing time , the optical spectra of the superlattice are expected to exhibit the frequency - domain counterpart of the bloch oscillations , i.e. the wannier - stark energy quantization discussed in section [ ss.qmp ] . in the absence of coulomb interaction , the wannier - stark ladder absorption increases as a function of the photon energy in a step - like fashion . these steps are equidistantly spaced . their spacing , named wannier - stark splitting , is proportional to the applied electric field . the simulated linear - absorption spectra corresponding to a superlattice structure with @xmath213 gaas wells and @xmath214 al@xmath201ga@xmath202as barriers are shown in figure [ fig6sl ] @xcite . as we can see , the coulomb interaction gives rise to excitonic peaks in the absorption spectra and introduces couplings between these wannier - stark states . such exciton peaks , which are no longer equidistantly spaced , are often referred to as excitonic wannier - stark ladders @xcite of the superlattice . since for the superlattice structure considered in this simulated experiment @xcite the combined miniband width is larger than the typical two- and three - dimensional exciton binding energies , it is possible to investigate the quasi - three dimensional absorption behavior of the delocalized miniband states as well as localization effects induced by the electric field . for the free - field case , the electron and hole states are completely delocalized in our three - dimensional @xmath2-space . the perturbation induced by the application of a low field ( here @xmath215 kv / cm ) , couples the states along the field direction and in the spectra the franz - keldysh effect , well known from bulk materials @xcite , appears : one clearly notices oscillations which increase in amplitude with the field and shift with @xmath216 from the @xmath217 and @xmath218 levels toward the center of the combined miniband . for increasing field the potential drop over the distance of a few quantum wells eventually exceeds the miniband width and the electronic states become more and more localized . despite the field - induced energy difference @xmath219 , the superlattice potential is equal for quantum wells separated by @xmath220 . therefore , the spectra decouple into a series of peaks corresponding to the excitonic ground states of the individual electron - hole wannier - stark levels . each wannier - stark transition contributes to the absorption with a pronounced @xmath221 exciton peak , plus higher bound exciton and continuum states . the oscillator strength of a transition @xmath39 is proportional to the overlap between electron and hole wavefunctions centered at quantum wells @xmath41 and @xmath222 , respectively . the analysis shows that this oscillator strength is almost exclusively determined by the amplitude of the electron wavefunction in quantum well @xmath223 since for fields in the wannier - stark regime the hole wavefunctions are almost completely localized over one quantum well due to their high effective mass ( see figure [ fig2sl ] ) . thus , the oscillator strengths of transitions to higher @xmath224 become smaller with increasing @xmath224 and field . at high fields ( here @xmath225 kv / cm ) the separation between the peaks is almost equal to @xmath226 . for example , the peak of the @xmath227 transition which is shifted by the wannier - stark exciton binding energy with respect to the center of the combined miniband , demonstrates that the increasing localization also increases the exciton binding energy . this increased excitonic binding reflects the gradual transition from a three- to a two - dimensional behavior , discussed in detail in @xcite . for intermediate fields there is an interplay between the wannier - stark and the franz - keldysh effect . coming from high fields , first the wannier - stark peaks are modulated by the franz - keldysh oscillations . however , as soon as the separation @xmath228 between neighboring peaks becomes smaller than their spectral widths , the peaks can no longer be resolved individually so that only the franz - keldysh structure remains . the importance of coulomb - correlation effects in optical spectra of semiconductors and their dependence on dimensionality has now been long recognized @xcite . more recently , increasing interest has been devoted to one - dimensional ( 1d ) systems @xcite , prompted by promising advances in quantum - wire fabrication and application , e.g. quantum - wire lasers . the main goal is to achieve structures with improved optical efficiency as compared to two - dimensional ( 2d ) and three - dimensional ( 3d ) ones . a common argument in favour of this effort is based on the well known van hove divergence in the 1d joint density - of - states ( dos ) , which is expected to give rise to very sharp peaks in the optical spectra of 1d structures . such prediction is however based on free - carrier properties of ideal 1d systems and it ignores coulomb - correlation effects . early theoretical investigations by ogawa and coworkers @xcite , based on a 1d single - subband model of the wires , showed that the inverse - square - root singularity in the 1d dos at the band edge is smoothed when excitonic effects are taken into account . in this section , we will review recent theoretical results @xcite based on a full 3d description of realistic quantum - wire structures made available by the present technology , such as structures obtained by epitaxial growth on non - planar substrates ( v - shaped wires ) @xcite or by cleaved - edge quantum well overgrowth ( t - shaped wires ) @xcite . on the one hand , this approach allows an accurate determination of 1d - exciton binding energies ; on the other hand , it allows us to investigate also the non linear ( gain ) regime . in both cases , one finds a strong suppression of the 1d band - edge singularity , in agreement with previous results based on simplified 1d models @xcite . this theoretical approach @xcite is based on the general kinetic theory presented in section [ s.tb ] , which allows a full 3d description of coulomb interaction within a multiminiband scheme . in particular , we focus on the quasi - equilibrium regime where the solution of the coupled kinetic equations ( [ eq30 ] ) simply reduces to the solution of the interband - polarization equation . this is performed by direct numerical evaluation of the polarization eigenvalues and eigenvectors @xcite , which fully determine the absorption spectrum as well as the exciton wavefunctions . the main ingredients entering this calculation are the single - particle energies and wavefunctions , obtained numerically for the 2d confinement potential deduced , e.g. , from tem as in @xcite . the above theoretical scheme has been applied to realistic v- and t - shaped wire structures . in particular , here we show results for the gaas / algaas v - wire structure of ref . @xcite , whose cross - section is shown in figure [ fig1qwr ] . let us start considering the optical response of the system in the low - density limit . in figure [ fig2qwr ] we show the linear - absorption spectra obtained when taking into account the lowest wire transition only . results of our coulomb - correlated ( cc ) approach are compared to those of the free - carrier ( fc ) model . as we can see , electron - hole correlation introduces two important effects : first , the excitonic peak arises below the onset of the continuum , with a binding energy of about @xmath229 mev , in excellent agreement with recent experiments @xcite . second , one finds a strong suppression of the 1d dos singularity . a detailed analysis of the physical origin of such suppression @xcite has shown that the quantity which is mainly modified by cc is the oscillator strength ( os ) . in figure [ fig3qwr](a ) the ratio between the cc and fc os is plotted as a function of excess energy ( solid line ) . this ratio is always less than one and goes to zero at the band edge , and reflects a sort of hole in the electron - hole correlation function @xmath230 as shown in figure [ fig3qwr](b ) . such vanishing behaviour is found to dominate the 1d dos singularity and , as a result , the absorption spectrum exhibits a regular behaviour at the band edge ( solid line in figure [ fig2qwr ] ) . the above analysis shows that also for realistic quantum - wire structures electron - hole correlation leads to a strong suppression of the 1d band - edge singularity in the linear - absorption spectrum , contrary to the 2d and 3d cases . most of the potential quantum - wire applications , i.e. 1d lasers and modulators , operate in strongly non - linear - response regimes @xcite . in such conditions , the above linear - response analysis has to be generalized taking into account additional factors as : ( i ) screening effects , ( ii ) band renormalization , ( iii ) space - phase filling . figure [ fig4qwr ] reports quantitative results for non - linear absorption spectra of realistic v - shaped wire structures at different carrier densities at room temperature . as a reference we also show the results obtained by including the lowest subband only [ figure [ fig4qwr](a ) ] . in the low - density limit ( case a : @xmath231 @xmath232 ) we clearly recognize the exciton peak . with increasing carrier density , the strength of the excitonic absorption decreases due to phase - space filling and screening of the attractive electron - hole interaction , and moreover the band renormalization leads to a red - shift of the continuum . at a density of @xmath233 @xmath232 ( case d ) the spectrum already exhibits a negative region corresponding to stimulated emission , i.e. gain regime . as desired , the well pronounced gain spectrum extends over a limited energy region ( smaller than the thermal energy ) ; however , its shape differs considerably from the ideal fc one ( curve marked with diamonds in the same figure ) . in particular , the band - edge singularity in the ideal fc gain spectrum is clearly smeared out by electron - hole correlation . the overall effect is a broader and less pronounced gain region . finally , figure [ fig4qwr](b ) shows the non - linear spectra corresponding to the realistic case of a 12-subband v - shaped wire . in comparison with the single - subband case [ figure [ fig4qwr](a ) ] , the multisubband nature is found to play an important role in modifying the typical shape of the gain spectra , which for both cc and fc models result to extend over a range much larger than that of the single - subband case for the present wire geometry . in addition , the coulomb - induced suppression of the single - subband singularities , here also due to intersubband - coupling effects , tends to reduce the residual structures in the gain profile . therefore , even in the ideal case of a quantum wire with negligible disorder and scattering - induced broadening , our analysis indicates that , for the typical structure considered , the shape of the absorption spectra over the whole density range differs considerably from the sharp fc spectrum of figure [ fig2qwr ] . this tells us that , in order to obtain sharp gain profiles , one of the basic steps in quantum - wire technology is to produce structures with increased subband splitting . however , the disorder - induced inhomogeneous broadening , not considered here , is known to increase significantly the spectral broadening and this effect is expected to increase with increasing subband splitting . therefore , extremely - high - quality structures ( e.g. single - monolayer control ) seem to be the only possible candidates for successful quantum - wire applications . a review of coherent phenomena in optically - excited semiconductors has been presented . our analysis has allowed the identification of two classes of phenomena : _ optically - induced _ and _ coulomb - induced _ coherent phenomena . we have shown that both classes can be described in terms of a unique theoretical framework based on the density - matrix formalism . due to its generality , such quantum - kinetic approach allows a realistic description of coherent as well as incoherent , i.e. phase - breaking , processes , thus providing quantitative information on the coupled coherent vs. incoherent carrier dynamics in photoexcited semiconductors . the primary goal of the paper was to discuss the concept of quantum - mechanical phase coherence as well as its relevance and implications on semiconductor physics and technology . in particular , we have analyzed the dominant role played by optically induced phase coherence on the process of ultrafast carrier photogeneration . we have then discussed typical field - induced coherent phenomena in semiconductor superlattices , e.g. bloch oscillations and the corresponding thz radiation , as well as their dephasing dynamics . finally , we have analyzed the dominant role played by coulomb correlation on the linear and non - linear optical spectra of realistic quantum - wire structures , namely the coulomb - induced suppression of ideal 1d - band - edge singularities . our analysis shows that the conventional separation between coherent and incoherent regimes is no longer valid for most of the recent ultrafast optical experiments in semiconductors . the reason is that on such extremely short time - scales the carrier dynamics is the result of a strong interplay between coherence and relaxation , thus preventing a time - scale separation between photogeneration and relaxation dynamics . similar considerations apply to the various coulomb - induced phenomena : the strong modifications induced by coulomb correlation on the optical response of low - dimensional semiconductors play a significant role on the phase - breaking relaxation dynamics as well . it is thus evident that any theoretical analysis of the optical response of semiconductor heterostructures must provide a proper description of both coherent and incoherent phenomena as well as of their mutual coupling on the same kinetic level . i am particularly grateful to tilmann kuhn for his essential contribution in understanding most of the ideas and concepts discussed in this topical review . i wish to thank stephan w. koch , torsten meier , and peter thomas , as well as elisa molinari , for their relevant contributions to the research activity reviewed in the paper . i am also grateful to roberto cingolani , thomas elsaesser , alfred leitenstorfer , and peter e. selbmann for stimulating and fruitful discussions . j. shah , _ ultrafast spectroscopy of semiconductors and semiconductor nanostructures _ ( springer , berlin , 1996 ) . l. allen , j.h . eberly , _ optical resonance and two - level atoms _ ( interscience , new york 1975 ) . m. sargent iii , m.o . scully , w.e . lamb jr . , _ laser physics _ ( addison - wesley , new york 1977 ) . shen , _ the principles of nonlinear optics _ ( wiley , new york 1984 ) . levenson , s.s . kano , _ introduction to nonlinear laser spectroscopy _ ( academic , boston 1988 ) . p. meystre , m. sargent iii , _ elements of quantum optics _ , 2nd edn . ( springer , berlin , heidelberg 1991 ) . mills , _ nonlinear optics _ ( springer , berlin , heidelberg 1991 ) . h. haug and s.w . koch , _ quantum theory of the optical and electronic properties of semiconductors _ , 3rd edn . ( world scientific , singapore 1994 ) . w. demtroeder , _ laser spectroscopy _ , ( springer , berlin , heidelberg 1996 ) . f. henneberger , s. schmitt - rink , e.o . gbel ( eds . ) , _ optics of semiconductor nanostructures _ ( akademie verlag , berlin 1993 ) . phillips ( ed . ) _ coherent optical processes in semiconductors _ , nato asi series b : physics , vol . 30 ( plenum , new york 1994 ) . hahn , phys . rev . * 80 * , 580 ( 1950 ) . kurnit , i.d . abella , and s.r . hartmann , phys . * 13 * , 567 ( 1964 ) . abella , n.a . kurnit , and s.r . hartmann , phys . * 141 * , 391 ( 1966 ) . j. shah and r.c . c. leite , phys . rev . lett . * 22 * , 1304 ( 1969 ) . shank , r.l . fork , r.f . leheny , and j. shah , phys . * 42 * , 112 ( 1979 ) . j. shah , b. deveaud , t.c . damen , w.t . tsang , a.c . gossard , and p. lugli , phys . 59 * , 2222 ( 1987 ) . t. elsaesser , j. shah , l. rota , and p. lugli , phys . lett . * 66 * , 1757 ( 1991 ) . ulbrich , j.a . kash , and j.c . tsang , phys . lett . * 62 * , 949 ( 1989 ) . peterson and s.a . lyon , phys . 65 * , 760 ( 1990 ) . snoke , w.w . rhle , y .- c . lu , and e. bauser , phys . . lett . * 68 * , 990 ( 1992 ) . oudar , a. migus , d. hulin , g. grillon , j. etchepare , and a. antonetti , phys . rev . lett . * 53 * , 384 ( 1984 ) . foing , d. hulin , m. joffre , m.k . jackson , j .- l . oudar , c. tanguy , and m. combescot , phys . lett . * 68 * , 110 ( 1992 ) . a. leitenstorfer , c. frst , a. laubereau , w. kaiser , g. trnkle , and g. weimann , phys . . lett . * 76 * , 1545 ( 1996 ) . s. lutgen , r. kaindl , m. woerner , t. elsaesser , a. hase , h. knzel , m. gulia , d. meglio , and p. lugli , phys . lett . * 77 * , 3657 ( 1996 ) . m. joschko , m. woerner , t. elsaesser , e. binder , t. kuhn , r. hey , h. kostial , and k. ploog , phys . rev . * 78 * , 737 ( 1997 ) . c. jacoboni and p. lugli , _ the monte carlo method for semiconductor device simulations _ ( springer , wien 1989 ) . s.m . goodnick and p. lugli , in _ hot carriers in semiconductor nanostructures : physics and applications _ , edited by j. shah ( academic , san diego 1992 ) , p. 191 . f. rossi , p. poli , and c. jacoboni , semicond . * 7 * , 1017 ( 1992 ) . a. mysyrowicz , d. hulin , a. antonetti , a. migus , w.t . masselink , and h. morko , phys . 56 * , 2748 ( 1986 ) . n. peyghambarian , s.w . koch , m. lindberg , b.d . flgel , m. joffre , phys . * 62 * , 1185 ( 1989 ) . knox , d.s . chemla , d.a.b . miller , j.b . stark , and s. schmitt - rink , phys . * 1989 * , 1189 ( 1989 ) . kundiff , a. knorr , j. feldmann , s.w . koch , e.o . gbel , h. nichel , phys . 73 * , 1178 ( 1994 ) . becker , h.l . fragnito , c.h . brito cruz , r.l . fork , j.e . cunningham , j.e . henry , and c.v . shank , phys . lett . * 61 * , 1647 ( 1988 ) . y. masumoto , s. shionoya , and t. takagahara , phys . lett . * 51 * , 923 ( 1983 ) . l. schultheis , j. kuhl , a. honold , and c.w . tu , phys . 57 * , 1635 ( 1986 ) ; phys . * 57 * , 1797 ( 1986 ) . g. noll , u. siegner , s.g . shevel , and e.o . gbel , phys . lett . * 64 * , 792 ( 1990 ) . v. langer , h. stolz , and w. von der osten , phys . lett . * 64 * , 854 ( 1990 ) . gbel , k. leo , t.c . damen , j. shah , s. schmitt - rink , w. schfer , j.f . mller , and k. khler , phys . rev . lett . * 64 * , 1801 ( 1990 ) . d. frhlich , a. kulik , b. uebbing , a. mysyrowicz , v. langer , h. stolz , and w. von der osten , phys . * 67 * , 2343 ( 1991 ) . h. stolz , v. langer , e. schreiber , s.a . permogorov , w. von der osten , phys . lett . * 67 * , 679 ( 1991 ) . k. leo , j. shah , e.o . gbel , t.c . damen , s. schmitt - rink , w. schfer , and k. khler , phys . rev . lett . * 66 * , 201 ( 1991 ) . j. feldmann , t. meier , g. von plessen , m. koch , e.o . gbel , p. thomas , g. bacher , c. hartmann , h. schweizer , w. schfer , and h. nickel , phys . * 70 * , 3027 ( 1993 ) . c. waschke , h.g . roskos , r. schwedler , k. leo , h. kurz , and k. khler , phys . lett . * 70 * , 3319 ( 1993 ) . k. leo , m. wegener , j. shah , d.s . chemla , e.o . gbel , t.c . damen , s. schmitt - rink , and w. schfer , phys . 65 * , 1340 ( 1990 ) . s. weiss , m .- a . mycek , j .- y . bigot , s. schmitt - rink , and d.s . chemla , phys . * 69 * , 2685 ( 1992 ) . d .- s . kim , j. shah , j.e . cunningham , t.c . damen , w. schfer , m. hartmann , and s. schmitt - rink , phys . * 68 * , 1006 ( 1992 ) . d .- s . kim , j. shah , t.c . damen , w. schfer , f. jahnke , s. schmitt - rink , and k. khler , phys . * 69 * , 2725 ( 1992 ) . roskos , m.c . nuss , j. shah , k. leo , d.a.b . miller , a.m. fox , s. schmitt - rink , and k. khler , phys . lett . * 68 * , 2216 ( 1992 ) . planken , m.c . nuss , i. brener , k.w . goossen , m.s.c . luo , s.l . chuang , and l. pfeiffer , phys . lett . * 69 * , 3800 ( 1992 ) . c. comte and g. mahler , phys . rev.b * 34 * , 7164 ( 1986 ) . s. schmitt - rink , c. ell , and h. haug , phys . rev . b*33 * , 1183 ( 1986 ) . s. schmitt - rink , d.s . chemla , and h. haug , phys . b*37 * , 941 ( 1988 ) . k. henneberger and h. haug , phys . b*38 * , 9759 ( 1988 ) . kuznetsov , phys . rev . b*44 * , 8721 ( 1991 ) . h. haug and c. ell , phys . b*46 * , 2126 ( 1992 ) . i. balslev , r. zimmermann , and a. stahl , phys . b*40 * , 4095 ( 1989 ) . s. schmitt - rink and d.s . chemla , phys . * 57 * , 2752 ( 1986 ) . m. lindberg and s.w . koch , phys . b*38 * , 3342 ( 1988 ) . m. wegener , d.s . chemla , s. schmitt - rink , and w. schfer , phys . rev . a*42 * , 5675 ( 1990 ) . w. schfer , f. jahnke , and s. schmitt - rink , phys . rev . b*47 * , 1217 ( 1993 ) . e. binder , t. kuhn , and g. mahler , phys . rev . * b50 * , 18319 ( 1994 ) . o. hess and t. kuhn , phys . a * 54 * , 3347 ( 1996 ) ; ibid . 3360 ( 1996 ) . t. kuhn , in _ theory of transport properties of semiconductor nanostructures _ , edited by e. schll ( chapman & hall , london 1997 ) . r.l . fork , c.h . brito cruz , p.c . becker , and c.v . shank , phys . * 12 * , 483 ( 1987 ) . t. kuhn and f. rossi , phys . lett . * 69 * , 977 ( 1992 ) . t. kuhn and f. rossi , phys . b * 46 * , 7496 ( 1992 ) . f. rossi , s. haas , and t. kuhn , semicond . * 9 * , 411 ( 1994 ) . f. rossi , s. haas , and t. kuhn , phys . lett . * 72 * , 152 ( 1994 ) . s. haas , f. rossi , and t. kuhn , phys . b * 53 * , 12855 ( 1996 ) . a. lohner , k. rick , p. leisching , a. leitenstorfer , t. elsaesser , t. kuhn , f. rossi , and w. stolz , phys . lett . * 71 * , 77 ( 1993 ) . a. leitenstorfer , a. lohner , k. rick , p. leisching , t. elsaesser , t. kuhn , f. rossi , w. stolz , and k. ploog , phys . b * 49 * , 16372 ( 1994 ) . a. leitenstorfer , a. lohner , t. elsaesser , s. haas , f. rossi , t. kuhn , w. klein , g. boehm , g. traenkle , and g. weimann , phys . lett . * 73 * , 1687 ( 1994 ) . t. kuhn , f. rossi , a. leitenstorfer , a. lohner , t. elsaesser , w. klein , g. boehm , g. traenkle , and g.w . weimann , in _ hot carriers in semiconductors _ , edited by k. hess , j .- leburton , and u. ravaioli ( plenum press , new york , 1996 ) , p. 199 . a. leitenstorfer , t. elsaesser , f. rossi , t. kuhn , w. klein , g. boehm , g. traenkle , and g.w . weimann , phys . b * 53 * , 9876 ( 1996 ) . f. bloch , phys . rev . * 70 * , 460 ( 1946 ) . kash and j.c . tsang , in _ light scattering in solids vi _ , edited by m. cardona and g.gntherodt , springer , berlin ( 1989 ) , p. 423 . w. ptz and p. kocevar , phys . b * 28 * , 7040 ( 1983 ) . w. quade , e. schll , f. rossi , and c. jacoboni , phys . b * 50 * , 7398 ( 1994 ) . f. rossi , r. brunetti , and c. jacoboni , in _ hot carriers in semiconductor nanostructures : physics and applications _ , edited by j. shah ( academic press inc . , boston , 1992 ) , p. 153 . r. brunetti , c. jacoboni , and f. rossi , phys . b * 39 * , 10781 ( 1989 ) tran thoai and h. haug , phys . b * 47 * , 3574 ( 1993 ) . sayed , l. bnyai , and h. haug , phys . rev . * b50 * , 1541 ( 1994 ) . j. schilp , t. kuhn , and g. mahler , phys . b * 50 * , 5435 ( 1994 ) . v. meden , c. whler , j. fricke , and k. schnhammer , phys . rev . * b52 * , 5624 ( 1995 ) . kane , k.w . sun , and s.a . lyon , semicond . * 9 * , 697 ( 1994 ) kash , phys . rev . * b51 * , 4680 ( 1995 ) . f. bloch , z. phys . * 52 * , 555 ( 1928 ) . c. zener , proc . * 145 * , 523 ( 1934 ) . houston , phys . rev . * 57 * , 184 ( 1940 ) . e.o . kane , j. phys . solids * 12 * , 181 ( 1959 ) p.n . argyres , phys . rev . * 126 * , 1386 ( 1962 ) . g.h . wannier , phys . rev . * 117 * , 432 ( 1960 ) . j. zak , phys . lett . * 20 * , 1477 ( 1968 ) . c. kittel , _ quantum theory of solids _ ( wiley , new york , 1963 ) , p. 190 . j.b . krieger and g.j . iafrate , phys . b * 33 * , 5494 ( 1986 ) . g. nenciu , rev . phys . * 63 * , 91 ( 1991 ) . g. bastard , _ wave mechanics of semiconductor heterostructures _ , les editions de physique ( les ulis , france , 1989 ) . mendez , f. agullo - rueda , and j.m . hong , phys . lett . * 60 * , 2426 ( 1988 ) . p. voisin , j. bleuse , c. bouche , s. gaillard , c. alibert , and a , regreny , phys . lett . * 61 * , 1639 ( 1988 ) . j. feldmann , k. leo , j. shah , d.a.b . miller , j.e . cunningham , t. meier , g. von plessen , a. schulze , p. thomas , and s. schmitt - rink , phys . b * 46 * , 7252 ( 1992 ) . g. von plessen and p. thomas , phys . rev . b * 45 * , 9185 ( 1992 ) . k. leo , p.h . bolivar , f. brggemann , r. schwedler , solid state commun . * 84 * , 943 ( 1992 ) . p. leisching , p. haring bolivar , w. beck , y. dhaibi , f. bruggemann , r. schwedler , h. kurz , k. leo , and k. khler , phys . b * 50 * , 14389 ( 1994 ) . t. dekorsy , p. leisching , k. kohler , and h. kurz , phys . b * 50 * , 8106 ( 1994 ) . t. dekorsy , r. ott , h. kurz , and k. kohler , phys . b * 51 * , 17275 ( 1995 ) . roskos , c. waschke , r. schwedler , p. leisching , y. dhaibi , h. kurz , and k. khler , superlattices and microstructures * 15 * , 281 ( 1994 ) . f. rossi , in _ theory of transport properties of semiconductor nanostructures _ , edited by e. schll ( chapman & hall , london 1997 ) . f. rossi , t. meier , p. thomas , s.w . koch , p.e . selbmann , and e. molinari , phys . b * 51 * , 16943 ( 1995 ) . f. rossi , t. meier , p. thomas , s.w . koch , p.e . selbmann , and e. molinari , in _ hot carriers in semiconductors _ , edited by k. hess , j .- leburton , and u. ravaioli ( plenum press , new york , 1996 ) , p. 157 . t. meier , f. rossi , p. thomas , and s.w . koch , phys . lett . * 75 * , 2558 ( 1995 ) . je , t. meier , f. rossi , and s.w . koch , appl . lett . * 67 * , 2978 ( 1995 ) . koch , t. meier , t. stroucken , a. knorr , j. hader , f. rossi , and p. thomas , in _ microscopic theory of semiconductors : quantum kinetics , confinement and lasers _ , edited by s.w . koch ( world scientific , singapore , 1995 ) , p. 81 . f. rossi , m. gulia , p.e . selbmann , e. molinari , t. meier , p. thomas , and s.w . koch , in _ proc . 23rd icps , berlin , germany _ , edited by m. scheffler and r. zimmermann ( world scientific , singapore , 1996 ) , p. 1775 . h. rcker , e. molinari , and p. lugli , phys . b * 45 * , 6747 ( 1992 ) . e. molinari , in _ confined electrons and photons : new physics and applications _ , edited by e. burstein and c. weisbuch ( plenum , new york , 1994 ) . g. von plessen , t. meier , j. feldmann , e.o . gbel , p. thomas , k.w . goossen , j.m . kuo , and r.f . kopf , phys . b * 49 * , 14058 ( 1994 ) . m.m . dignam and j.e . sipe , phys . * 64 * , 1797 ( 1990 ) . see e.g. _ proc . 4th internat . conf . on optics of excitons in confined systems _ , il nuovo cimento d vol . 17 ( 1995 ) . for a review see : r. cingolani and r. rinaldi , rivista nuovo cimento * 16 * , 1 ( 1993 ) . t. ogawa and t. takagahara , phys . rev . * b43 * , 14325 ( 1991 ) . t. ogawa and t. takagahara , phys . rev . * b44 * , 8138 ( 1991 ) . f. rossi and e. molinari , phys . 76 * , 3642 ( 1996 ) . f. rossi and e. molinari , phys . rev . * b53 * , 16462 ( 1996 ) . f. rossi and e. molinari , in _ proc . 23rd icps , berlin , germany _ , edited by m. scheffler and r. zimmermann ( world scientific , singapore , 1996 ) , p. 1161 . r. rinaldi , r. cingolani , m. lepore , m. ferrara , i.m . catalano , f. rossi , l. rota , e. molinari , p. lugli , u. marti , d. martin , f. morrier - gemoud , p. ruterana , and f.k . reinhart , phys . lett . * 73 * , 2899 ( 1994 ) . t. someya , h. akiyama , and h. sakaki , phys . 76 * , 2965 ( 1996 ) . Abstract:
[ "a review of coherent phenomena in photoexcited semiconductors is presented . in particular , two classes of phenomena are considered : on the one hand the role played by optically - induced phase coherence in the ultrafast spectroscopy of semiconductors ; on the other hand the coulomb - induced effects on the coherent optical response of low - dimensional structures . all the phenomena discussed in the paper are analyzed in terms of a theoretical framework based on the density - matrix formalism . due to its generality , this quantum - kinetic approach allows a realistic description of coherent as well as incoherent , i.e. phase - breaking , processes , thus providing quantitative information on the coupled coherent vs. incoherent carrier dynamics in photoexcited semiconductors . the primary goal of the paper is to discuss the concept of quantum - mechanical phase coherence as well as its relevance and implications on semiconductor physics and technology . in particular , we will discuss the dominant role played by optically induced phase coherence on the process of carrier photogeneration and relaxation in bulk systems . we will then review typical field - induced coherent phenomena in semiconductor superlattices such as bloch oscillations and wannier - stark localization . finally , we will discuss the dominant role played by coulomb correlation on the linear and non - linear optical spectra of realistic quantum - wire structures . 0.8 cm -0.8 cm 15.7 cm -1.cm _ semiconductor science and technology _ + * review article on : *" ]
18,763
18,763
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: a central factor in the application of machine learning to a given task is the _ inductive bias _ , _ i.e. _ the choice of hypotheses space from which learned functions are taken . the restriction posed by the inductive bias is necessary for practical learning , and reflects prior knowledge regarding the task at hand . perhaps the most successful exemplar of inductive bias to date manifests itself in the use of convolutional networks ( @xcite ) for computer vision tasks . these hypotheses spaces are delivering unprecedented visual recognition results ( _ e.g. _ @xcite ) , largely responsible for the resurgence of deep learning ( @xcite ) . unfortunately , our formal understanding of the inductive bias behind convolutional networks is limited the assumptions encoded into these models , which seem to form an excellent prior knowledge for imagery data , are for the most part a mystery . existing works studying the inductive bias of deep networks ( not necessarily convolutional ) do so in the context of _ depth efficiency _ , essentially arguing that for a given amount of resources , more layers result in higher expressiveness . more precisely , depth efficiency refers to a situation where a function realized by a deep network of polynomial size , requires super - polynomial size in order to be realized ( or approximated ) by a shallower network . in recent years , a large body of research was devoted to proving existence of depth efficiency under different types of architectures ( see for example @xcite ) . nonetheless , despite the wide attention it is receiving , depth efficiency does not convey the complete story behind the inductive bias of deep networks . while it does suggest that depth brings forth functions that are otherwise unattainable , it does not explain why these functions are useful . loosely speaking , the hypotheses space of a polynomially sized deep network covers a small fraction of the space of all functions . we would like to understand why this small fraction is so successful in practice . a specific family of convolutional networks gaining increased attention is that of _ convolutional arithmetic circuits_. these models follow the standard paradigm of locality , weight sharing and pooling , yet differ from the most conventional convolutional networks in that their point - wise activations are linear , with non - linearity originating from product pooling . recently , analyzed the depth efficiency of convolutional arithmetic circuits , showing that besides a negligible ( zero measure ) set , all functions realizable by a deep network require exponential size in order to be realized ( or approximated ) by a shallow one . this result , termed _ complete depth efficiency _ , stands in contrast to previous depth efficiency results , which merely showed _ existence _ of functions efficiently realizable by deep networks but not by shallow ones . besides their analytic advantage , convolutional arithmetic circuits are also showing promising empirical performance . in particular , they are equivalent to simnets a deep learning architecture that excels in computationally constrained settings ( ) , and in addition , have recently been utilized for classification with missing data ( ) . motivated by these theoretical and practical merits , we focus our analysis in this paper on convolutional arithmetic circuits , viewing them as representative of the class of convolutional networks . we empirically validate our conclusions with both convolutional arithmetic circuits and _ convolutional rectifier networks _ convolutional networks with rectified linear ( relu , @xcite ) activation and max or average pooling . adaptation of the formal analysis to networks of the latter type , similarly to the adaptation of the analysis in carried out by , is left for future work . our analysis approaches the study of inductive bias from the direction of function inputs . specifically , we study the ability of convolutional arithmetic circuits to model correlation between regions of their input . to analyze the correlations of a function , we consider different partitions of input regions into disjoint sets , and ask how far the function is from being separable w.r.t . these partitions . distance from separability is measured through the notion of _ separation rank _ ( @xcite ) , which can be viewed as a surrogate of the @xmath0 distance from the closest separable function . for a given function and partition of its input , high separation rank implies that the function induces strong correlation between sides of the partition , and vice versa . we show that a deep network supports exponentially high separation ranks for certain input partitions , while being limited to polynomial or linear ( in network size ) separation ranks for others . the network s pooling geometry effectively determines which input partitions are favored in terms of separation rank , _ i.e. _ which partitions enjoy the possibility of exponentially high separation rank with polynomial network size , and which require network to be exponentially large . the standard choice of square contiguous pooling windows favors interleaved ( entangled ) partitions over coarse ones that divide the input into large distinct areas . other choices lead to different preferences , for example pooling windows that join together nodes with their spatial reflections lead to favoring partitions that split the input symmetrically . we conclude that in terms of modeled correlations , pooling geometry controls the inductive bias , and the particular design commonly employed in practice orients it towards the statistics of natural images ( nearby pixels more correlated than ones that are far apart ) . moreover , when processing data that departs from the usual domain of natural imagery , prior knowledge regarding its statistics can be used to derive respective pooling schemes , and accordingly tailor the inductive bias . with regards to depth efficiency , we show that separation ranks under favored input partitions are exponentially high for all but a negligible set of the functions realizable by a deep network . shallow networks on the other hand , treat all partitions equally , and support only linear ( in network size ) separation ranks . therefore , almost all functions that may be realized by a deep network require a replicating shallow network to have exponential size . by this we return to the complete depth efficiency result of , but with an added important insight into the benefit of functions brought forth by depth they are able to efficiently model strong correlation under favored partitions of the input . the remainder of the paper is organized as follows . [ sec : prelim ] provides a brief presentation of necessary background material from the field of tensor analysis . [ sec : cac ] describes the convolutional arithmetic circuits we analyze , and their relation to tensor decompositions . in sec . [ sec : sep_rank ] we convey the concept of separation rank , on which we base our analyses in sec . [ sec : analysis ] and [ sec : inductive_bias ] . the conclusions from our analyses are empirically validated in sec . [ sec : exp ] . finally , sec . [ sec : discussion ] concludes . the analyses carried out in this paper rely on concepts and results from the field of tensor analysis . in this section we establish the minimal background required in order to follow our arguments , referring the interested reader to @xcite for a broad and comprehensive introduction to the field . the core concept in tensor analysis is a _ tensor _ , which for our purposes may simply be thought of as a multi - dimensional array . the _ order _ of a tensor is defined to be the number of indexing entries in the array , which are referred to as _ modes_. the _ dimension _ of a tensor in a particular mode is defined as the number of values that may be taken by the index in that mode . for example , a @xmath1-by-@xmath2 matrix is a tensor of order @xmath3 , _ i.e. _ it has two modes , with dimension @xmath1 in mode @xmath4 and dimension @xmath2 in mode @xmath3 . if @xmath5 is a tensor of order @xmath6 and dimension @xmath7 in each mode @xmath8:=\{1,\ldots , n\}$ ] , the space of all configurations it can take is denoted , quite naturally , by @xmath9 . a fundamental operator in tensor analysis is the _ tensor product _ , which we denote by @xmath10 . it is an operator that intakes two tensors @xmath11 and @xmath12 ( orders @xmath13 and @xmath14 respectively ) , and returns a tensor @xmath15 ( order @xmath16 ) defined by : @xmath17 . notice that in the case @xmath18 , the tensor product reduces to the standard outer product between vectors , _ i.e. _ if @xmath19 and @xmath20 , then @xmath21 is no other than the rank-1 matrix @xmath22 . we now introduce the important concept of matricization , which is essentially the rearrangement of a tensor as a matrix . suppose @xmath5 is a tensor of order @xmath6 and dimension @xmath7 in each mode @xmath8 $ ] , and let @xmath23 be a partition of @xmath24 $ ] , _ i.e. _ @xmath25 and @xmath26 are disjoint subsets of @xmath24 $ ] whose union gives @xmath24 $ ] . we may write @xmath27 where @xmath28 , and similarly @xmath29 where @xmath30 . the _ matricization of @xmath5 w.r.t . the partition @xmath23 _ , denoted @xmath31 , is the @xmath32-by-@xmath33 matrix holding the entries of @xmath5 such that @xmath34 is placed in row index @xmath35 and column index @xmath36 . if @xmath37 or @xmath38 , then by definition @xmath31 is a row or column ( respectively ) vector of dimension @xmath39 holding @xmath34 in entry @xmath40 . a well known matrix operator is the _ kronecker product _ , which we denote by @xmath41 . for two matrices @xmath42 and @xmath43 , @xmath44 is the matrix in @xmath45 holding @xmath46 in row index @xmath47 and column index @xmath48 . let @xmath5 and @xmath49 be tensors of orders @xmath13 and @xmath14 respectively , and let @xmath23 be a partition of @xmath50 $ ] . the basic relation that binds together the tensor product , the matricization operator , and the kronecker product , is : _ i , j=_i , j_(i - p),(j - p ) [ eq : mat_tensor_prod ] where @xmath51 and @xmath52 are simply the sets obtained by subtracting @xmath13 from each of the elements in @xmath25 and @xmath26 respectively . in words , eq . [ eq : mat_tensor_prod ] implies that the matricization of the tensor product between @xmath5 and @xmath49 w.r.t . the partition @xmath23 of @xmath50 $ ] , is equal to the kronecker product between two matricizations : that of @xmath5 w.r.t . the partition of @xmath53 $ ] induced by the lower values of @xmath23 , and that of @xmath49 w.r.t . the partition of @xmath54 $ ] induced by the higher values of @xmath23 . the convolutional arithmetic circuit architecture on which we focus in this paper is the one considered in , portrayed in fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) . instances processed by a network are represented as @xmath6-tuples of @xmath55-dimensional vectors . they are generally thought of as images , with the @xmath55-dimensional vectors corresponding to local patches . for example , instances could be @xmath56-by-@xmath56 rgb images , with local patches being @xmath57 regions crossing the three color bands . in this case , assuming a patch is taken around every pixel in an image ( boundaries padded ) , we have @xmath58 and @xmath59 . throughout the paper , we denote a general instance by @xmath60 , with @xmath61 standing for its patches . the first layer in a network is referred to as _ representation_. it consists of applying @xmath62 _ representation functions _ @xmath63 to all patches , thereby creating @xmath62 feature maps . in the case where representation functions are chosen as @xmath64 , with parameters @xmath65 and some point - wise activation @xmath66 , the representation layer reduces to a standard convolutional layer . more elaborate settings are also possible , for example modeling the representation as a cascade of convolutional layers with pooling in - between . following the representation , a network includes @xmath67 hidden layers indexed by @xmath68 . each hidden layer @xmath69 begins with a _ @xmath70 conv _ operator , which is simply a three - dimensional convolution with @xmath71 channels and filters of spatial dimensions @xmath4-by-@xmath4 . conv operator . the first , referred to as _ weight sharing _ , is the one described above , and corresponds to standard convolution . the second is more general , allowing filters that slide across the previous layer to have different weights at different spatial locations . it is shown in that without weight sharing , a convolutional arithmetic circuit with one hidden layer ( or more ) is universal , _ i.e. _ can realize any function if its size ( width ) is unbounded . this property is imperative for the study of depth efficiency , as that requires shallow networks to ultimately be able to replicate any function realized by a deep network . in this paper we limit the presentation to networks with weight sharing , which are not universal . we do so because they are more conventional , and since our entire analysis is oblivious to whether or not weights are shared ( applies as is to both settings ) . the only exception is where we reproduce the depth efficiency result of . there , we momentarily consider networks without weight sharing . ] this is followed by spatial pooling , that decimates feature maps by taking products of non - overlapping two - dimensional windows that cover the spatial extent . the last of the @xmath67 hidden layers ( @xmath72 ) reduces feature maps to singletons ( its pooling operator is global ) , creating a vector of dimension @xmath73 . this vector is mapped into @xmath74 network outputs through a final dense linear layer . altogether , the architectural parameters of a network are the type of representation functions ( @xmath75 ) , the pooling window shapes and sizes ( which in turn determine the number of hidden layers @xmath67 ) , and the number of channels in each layer ( @xmath62 for representation , @xmath76 for hidden layers , @xmath74 for output ) . given these architectural parameters , the learnable parameters of a network are the representation weights ( @xmath77 for channel @xmath78 ) , the conv weights ( @xmath79 for channel @xmath80 of hidden layer @xmath69 ) , and the output weights ( @xmath81 for output node @xmath82 ) . for a particular setting of weights , every node ( neuron ) in a given network realizes a function from @xmath83 to @xmath84 . the _ receptive field _ of a node refers to the indexes of input patches on which its function may depend . for example , the receptive field of node @xmath85 in channel @xmath80 of conv operator at hidden layer @xmath86 is @xmath87 , and that of an output node is @xmath24 $ ] , corresponding to the entire input . denote by @xmath88 the function realized by node @xmath85 of channel @xmath80 in conv operator at hidden layer @xmath69 , and let @xmath89 $ ] be its receptive field . by the structure of the network it is evident that @xmath90 does not depend on @xmath80 , so we may write @xmath91 instead . moreover , assuming pooling windows are uniform across channels ( as customary with convolutional networks ) , and taking into account the fact that they do not overlap , we conclude that @xmath92 and @xmath93 are necessarily disjoint if @xmath94 . a simple induction over @xmath68 then shows that @xmath88 may be expressed as @xmath95 , where @xmath96 stands for the receptive field @xmath91 , and @xmath97 is a tensor of order @xmath98 and dimension @xmath62 in each mode , with entries given by polynomials in the network s conv weights @xmath99 . taking the induction one step further ( from last hidden layer to network output ) , we obtain the following expression for functions realized by network outputs : h_y(x_1, ,x_n)=_d_1 d_n=1^ma_d_1 d_n^y_i=1^n f__d_i(x_i ) [ eq : h_y ] @xmath100 $ ] here is an output node index , and @xmath101 is the function realized by that node . @xmath102 is a tensor of order @xmath6 and dimension @xmath62 in each mode , with entries given by polynomials in the network s conv weights @xmath99 and output weights @xmath81 . hereafter , terms such as _ function realized by a network _ or _ coefficient tensor realized by a network _ , are to be understood as referring to @xmath101 or @xmath102 respectively . next , we present explicit expressions for @xmath102 under two canonical networks deep and shallow . [ [ deep - network . ] ] deep network . + + + + + + + + + + + + + consider a network as in fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) , with pooling windows set to cover four entries each , resulting in @xmath103 hidden layers . the linear weights of such a network are @xmath104}$ ] for conv operator in hidden layer @xmath86 , @xmath105}$ ] for conv operator in hidden layer @xmath106 , and @xmath107}$ ] for dense output operator . they determine the coefficient tensor @xmath102 ( eq . [ eq : h_y ] ) through the following recursive decomposition : _ & = & _ = 1^r_0 a_^1 , ^4 a^0 , , + & & + _ & = & _ = 1^r_l-1 a_^l , ^4 ^l-1 , , l\{2 l-1 } , + & & + _ & = & _ = 1^r_l-1 a_^l , y ^4 ^l-1 , [ eq : hr_decomp ] @xmath108 and @xmath109 here are scalars representing entry @xmath110 in the vectors @xmath79 and @xmath81 respectively , and the symbol @xmath10 with a superscript stands for a repeated tensor product , _ e.g. _ @xmath111 . to verify that under pooling windows of size four @xmath102 is indeed given by eq . [ eq : hr_decomp ] , simply plug the rows of the decomposition into eq . [ eq : h_y ] , starting from bottom and continuing upwards . for context , eq . [ eq : hr_decomp ] describes what is known as a hierarchical tensor decomposition ( see chapter 11 in @xcite ) , with underlying tree over modes being a full quad - tree ( corresponding to the fact that the network s pooling windows cover four entries each ) . [ [ shallow - network . ] ] shallow network . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the second network we pay special attention to is shallow , comprising a single hidden layer with global pooling see illustration in fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](b ) . the linear weights of such a network are @xmath104}$ ] for hidden conv operator and @xmath112}$ ] for dense output operator . they determine the coefficient tensor @xmath102 ( eq . [ eq : h_y ] ) as follows : a^y=_=1^r_0 a^1,y _ ^na^0 , [ eq : cp_decomp ] where @xmath113 stands for entry @xmath80 of @xmath114 , and again , the symbol @xmath10 with a superscript represents a repeated tensor product . the tensor decomposition in eq . [ eq : cp_decomp ] is an instance of the classic cp decomposition , also known as rank-1 decomposition ( see @xcite for a historic survey ) . to conclude this section , we relate the background material above , as well as our contribution described in the upcoming sections , to the work of . the latter shows that with arbitrary coefficient tensors @xmath102 , functions @xmath101 as in eq . [ eq : h_y ] form a universal hypotheses space . it is then shown that convolutional arithmetic circuits as in fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) realize such functions by applying tensor decompositions to @xmath102 , with the type of decomposition determined by the structure of a network ( number of layers , number of channels in each layer _ etc . _ ) . the deep network ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) with size-@xmath1 pooling windows and @xmath103 hidden layers ) and the shallow network ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](b ) ) presented hereinabove are two special cases , whose corresponding tensor decompositions are given in eq . [ eq : hr_decomp ] and [ eq : cp_decomp ] respectively . the central result in relates to inductive bias through the notion of depth efficiency it is shown that in the parameter space of a deep network , all weight settings but a set of ( lebesgue ) measure zero give rise to functions that can only be realized ( or approximated ) by a shallow network if the latter has exponential size . this result does not relate to the characteristics of instances @xmath60 , it only treats the ability of shallow networks to replicate functions realized by deep networks . in this paper we draw a line connecting the inductive bias to the nature of @xmath115 , by studying the relation between a network s architecture and its ability to model correlation among patches @xmath116 . specifically , in sec . [ sec : sep_rank ] we consider partitions @xmath23 of @xmath24 $ ] ( @xmath117 $ ] , where @xmath118 stands for disjoint union ) , and present the notion of separation rank as a measure of the correlation modeled between the patches indexed by @xmath25 and those indexed by @xmath26 . in sec . [ sec : analysis : sep2mat ] the separation rank of a network s function @xmath101 w.r.t . a partition @xmath23 is proven to be equal to the rank of @xmath119 the matricization of the coefficient tensor @xmath102 w.r.t . [ sec : analysis : deep ] derives lower and upper bounds on this rank for a deep network , showing that it supports exponential separation ranks with polynomial size for certain partitions , whereas for others it is required to be exponentially large . subsequently , sec . [ sec : analysis : shallow ] establishes an upper bound on @xmath120 for shallow networks , implying that these must be exponentially large in order to model exponential separation rank under any partition , and thus can not efficiently replicate a deep network s correlations . our analysis concludes in sec . [ sec : inductive_bias ] , where we discuss the pooling geometry of a deep network as a means for controlling the inductive bias by determining a correspondence between partitions @xmath23 and spatial partitions of the input . finally , we demonstrate experimentally in sec . [ sec : exp ] how different pooling geometries lead to superior performance in different tasks . our experiments include not only convolutional arithmetic circuits , but also convolutional rectifier networks , _ i.e. _ convolutional networks with relu activation and max or average pooling . in this section we define the concept of separation rank for functions realized by convolutional arithmetic circuits ( sec . [ sec : cac ] ) , _ i.e. _ real functions that take as input @xmath121 . the separation rank serves as a measure of the correlations such functions induce between different sets of input patches , _ i.e. _ different subsets of the variable set @xmath122 . let @xmath23 be a partition of input indexes , _ @xmath25 and @xmath26 are disjoint subsets of @xmath24 $ ] whose union gives @xmath24 $ ] . we may write @xmath27 where @xmath28 , and similarly @xmath29 where @xmath30 . for a function @xmath123 , the _ separation rank w.r.t . the partition @xmath23 _ is defined as follows : or @xmath38 then by definition @xmath124 ( unless @xmath125 , in which case @xmath126 ) . ] sep(h;i , j):=\{rn\{0 } : s.t .. [ eq : sep_rank ] + .h(x_1, ,x_n)=_=1^rg_(x_i_1, ,x_i_)g_(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) } in words , it is the minimal number of summands that together give @xmath127 , where each summand is _ separable w.r.t . @xmath23 _ , _ i.e. _ is equal to a product of two functions one that intakes only patches indexed by @xmath25 , and another that intakes only patches indexed by @xmath26 . one may wonder if it is at all possible to express @xmath127 through such summands , _ i.e. _ if the separation rank of @xmath127 is finite . from the theory of tensor products between @xmath0 spaces ( see @xcite for a comprehensive coverage ) , we know that any @xmath128 , _ i.e. _ any @xmath127 that is measurable and square - integrable , may be approximated arbitrarily well by summations of the form @xmath129 . exact realization however is only guaranteed at the limit @xmath130 , thus in general the separation rank of @xmath127 need not be finite . nonetheless , as we show in sec . [ sec : analysis ] , for the class of functions we are interested in , namely functions realizable by convolutional arithmetic circuits , separation ranks are always finite . the concept of separation rank was introduced in @xcite for numerical treatment of high - dimensional functions , and has since been employed for various applications , _ e.g. _ quantum chemistry ( @xcite ) , particle engineering ( @xcite ) and machine learning ( @xcite ) . if the separation rank of a function w.r.t . a partition of its input is equal to @xmath4 , the function is separable , meaning it does not model any interaction between the sets of variables . specifically , if @xmath124 then there exist @xmath131 and @xmath132 such that @xmath133 , and the function @xmath127 can not take into account consistency between the values of @xmath134 and those of @xmath135 . in a statistical setting , if @xmath127 is a probability density function , this would mean that @xmath134 and @xmath135 are statistically independent . the higher @xmath136 is , the farther @xmath127 is from this situation , _ i.e. _ the more it models dependency between @xmath134 and @xmath135 , or equivalently , the stronger the correlation it induces between the patches indexed by @xmath25 and those indexed by @xmath26 . the interpretation of separation rank as a measure of deviation from separability is formalized in app . [ app : sep_rank_l2 ] , where it is shown that @xmath136 is closely related to the @xmath0 distance of @xmath127 from the set of separable functions w.r.t . specifically , we define @xmath137 as the latter distance divided by the @xmath0 norm of @xmath127 would accordingly rescale @xmath137 , rendering the latter uninformative in terms of deviation from separability . ] , and show that @xmath136 provides an upper bound on @xmath137 . while it is not possible to lay out a general lower bound on @xmath137 in terms of @xmath136 , we show that the specific lower bounds on @xmath136 underlying our analyses can be translated into lower bounds on @xmath137 . this implies that our results , facilitated by upper and lower bounds on separation ranks of convolutional arithmetic circuits , may equivalently be framed in terms of @xmath0 distances from separable functions . in this section we analyze convolutional arithmetic circuits ( sec . [ sec : cac ] ) in terms of the correlations they can model between sides of different input partitions , _ i.e. _ in terms of the separation ranks ( sec . [ sec : sep_rank ] ) they support under different partitions @xmath23 of @xmath24 $ ] . we begin in sec . [ sec : analysis : sep2mat ] , establishing a correspondence between separation ranks and coefficient tensor matricization ranks . this correspondence is then used in sec . [ sec : analysis : deep ] and [ sec : analysis : shallow ] to analyze the deep and shallow networks ( respectively ) presented in sec . [ sec : cac ] . we note that we focus on these particular networks merely for simplicity of presentation the analysis can easily be adapted to account for alternative networks with different depths and pooling schemes . let @xmath101 be a function realized by a convolutional arithmetic circuit , with corresponding coefficient tensor @xmath102 ( eq . [ eq : h_y ] ) . denote by @xmath23 an arbitrary partition of @xmath24 $ ] , _ i.e. _ @xmath117 $ ] . we are interested in studying @xmath138 the separation rank of @xmath101 w.r.t . @xmath23 ( eq . [ eq : sep_rank ] ) . as claim [ claim : sep_mat_ranks_equal ] below states , assuming representation functions @xmath139}$ ] are linearly independent ( if they are not , we drop dependent functions and modify @xmath102 accordingly is dependent , _ i.e. _ there exist @xmath140 such that @xmath141 . we may then plug this into eq . [ eq : h_y ] , and obtain an expression for @xmath101 that has @xmath142 as representation functions , and a coefficient tensor with dimension @xmath143 in each mode . continuing in this fashion , one arrives at an expression for @xmath101 whose representation functions are linearly independent . ] ) , this separation rank is equal to the rank of @xmath119 the matricization of the coefficient tensor @xmath102 w.r.t . the partition @xmath23 . our problem thus translates to studying ranks of matricized coefficient tensors . [ claim : sep_mat_ranks_equal ] let @xmath101 be a function realized by a convolutional arithmetic circuit ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) ) , with corresponding coefficient tensor @xmath102 ( eq . [ eq : h_y ] ) . assume that the network s representation functions @xmath75 are linearly independent , and that they , as well as the functions @xmath144 in the definition of separation rank ( eq . [ eq : sep_rank ] ) , are measurable and square - integrable . may seem as a limitation at first glance , as for example neurons @xmath64 , with parameters @xmath65 and sigmoid or relu activation @xmath66 , do not meet this condition . however , since in practice our inputs are bounded ( _ e.g. _ they represent image pixels by holding intensity values ) , we may view functions as having compact support , which , as long as they are continuous ( holds in all cases of interest ) , ensures square - integrability . ] then , for any partition @xmath23 of @xmath24 $ ] , it holds that @xmath145 . see app . [ app : proofs : sep_mat_ranks_equal ] . as the linear weights of a network vary , so do the coefficient tensors ( @xmath102 ) it gives rise to . accordingly , for a particular partition @xmath23 , a network does not correspond to a single value of @xmath120 , but rather supports a range of values . we analyze this range by quantifying its maximum , which reflects the strongest correlation that the network can model between the input patches indexed by @xmath25 and those indexed by @xmath26 . one may wonder if the maximal value of @xmath120 is the appropriate statistic to measure , as a - priori , it may be that @xmath120 is maximal for very few of the network s weight settings , and much lower for all the rest . apparently , as claim [ claim : mat_rank_max_everywhere ] below states , this is not the case , and in fact @xmath120 is maximal under almost all of the network s weight settings . [ claim : mat_rank_max_everywhere ] consider a convolutional arithmetic circuit ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) ) with corresponding coefficient tensor @xmath102 ( eq . [ eq : h_y ] ) . @xmath102 depends on the network s linear weights @xmath99 and @xmath81 , thus for a given partition @xmath23 of @xmath24 $ ] , @xmath120 is a function of these weights . this function obtains its maximum almost everywhere ( w.r.t . lebesgue measure ) . see app . [ app : proofs : mat_rank_max_everywhere ] . in this subsection we study correlations modeled by the deep network presented in sec . [ sec : cac ] ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) with size-@xmath1 pooling windows and @xmath103 hidden layers ) . in accordance with sec . [ sec : analysis : sep2mat ] , we do so by characterizing the maximal ranks of coefficient tensor matricizations under different partitions . recall from eq . [ eq : hr_decomp ] the hierarchical decomposition expressing a coefficient tensor @xmath102 realized by the deep network . we are interested in matricizations of this tensor under different partitions of @xmath24 $ ] . let @xmath23 be an arbitrary partition , _ i.e. _ @xmath117 $ ] . matricizing the last level of eq . [ eq : hr_decomp ] w.r.t . @xmath23 , while applying the relation in eq . [ eq : mat_tensor_prod ] , gives : ^y_i , j & = & _ = 1^r_l-1a_^l , y^l-1,^l-1,^l-1,^l-1,_i , j + & = & _ = 1^r_l-1a_^l , y^l-1,^l-1,_i , j + & & ^l-1,^l-1,_(i-24^l-1),(j-24^l-1 ) + applying eq . [ eq : mat_tensor_prod ] again , this time to matricizations of the tensor @xmath146 , we obtain : ^y_i , j & = & _ = 1^r_l-1a_^l , y^l-1,_i , j + & & ^l-1,_(i-4^l-1),(j-4^l-1 ) + & & ^l-1,_(i-24^l-1),(j-24^l-1 ) + & & ^l-1,_(i-34^l-1),(j-34^l-1 ) for every @xmath147 $ ] define @xmath148 $ ] and @xmath149 $ ] . in words , @xmath150 represents the partition induced by @xmath23 on the @xmath151th quadrant of @xmath24 $ ] , _ i.e. _ on the @xmath151th size-@xmath152 group of input patches . we now have the following matricized version of the last level in eq . [ eq : hr_decomp ] : @xmath153 where the symbol @xmath41 with a running index stands for an iterative kronecker product . to derive analogous matricized versions for the upper levels of eq . [ eq : hr_decomp ] , we define for @xmath154 $ ] : i_l , k:=(i-(k-1)4^l ) j_l , k:=(j-(k-1)4^l)[eq:_i_lk_j_lk ] that is to say , @xmath155 represents the partition induced by @xmath23 on the set of indexes @xmath156 , _ i.e. _ on the @xmath151th size-@xmath157 group of input patches . with this notation in hand , traversing upwards through the levels of eq . [ eq : hr_decomp ] , with repeated application of the relation in eq . [ eq : mat_tensor_prod ] , one arrives at the following matrix decomposition for @xmath119 : _ & = & _ = 1^r_0 a_^1 , ^0,_i_0,4(k-1)+t , j_0,4(k-1)+t , + & & + _ & = & _ = 1^r_l-1 a_^l , ^l-1,_i_l-1,4(k-1)+t , j_l-1,4(k-1)+t , l\{2 l-1 } , + & & + _ & = & _ = 1^r_l-1 a_^l , y ^l-1,_i_l-1,t , j_l-1,t [ eq : mat_hr_decomp ] eq . [ eq : mat_hr_decomp ] expresses @xmath119 the matricization w.r.t . the partition @xmath23 of a coefficient tensor @xmath102 realized by the deep network , in terms of the network s conv weights @xmath99 and output weights @xmath81 . as discussed above , our interest lies in the maximal rank that this matricization can take . theorem [ theorem : deep_mat_rank_bounds ] below provides lower and upper bounds on this maximal rank , by making use of eq . [ eq : mat_hr_decomp ] , and of the rank - multiplicative property of the kronecker product ( @xmath158 ) . [ theorem : deep_mat_rank_bounds ] let @xmath23 be a partition of @xmath24 $ ] , and @xmath119 be the matricization w.r.t . @xmath23 of a coefficient tensor @xmath102 ( eq . [ eq : h_y ] ) realized by the deep network ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) with size-@xmath1 pooling windows ) . for every @xmath159 and @xmath160 $ ] , define @xmath161 and @xmath162 as in eq . [ eq:_i_lk_j_lk ] . then , the maximal rank that @xmath119 can take ( when network weights vary ) is : * no smaller than @xmath163 , where @xmath164 : i_{1,k}\neq\emptyset \wedge j_{1,k}\neq\emptyset\ } \right\rvert}$ ] . * no greater than @xmath165 , where @xmath166 for @xmath167 $ ] , and @xmath168 for @xmath169,k\in[n/4^l]$ ] . see app . [ app : proofs : deep_mat_rank_bounds ] . the lower bound in theorem [ theorem : deep_mat_rank_bounds ] is exponential in @xmath170 , the latter defined to be the number of size-@xmath1 patch groups that are split by the partition @xmath23 , _ i.e. _ whose indexes are divided between @xmath25 and @xmath26 . partitions that split many of the size-@xmath1 patch groups will thus lead to a large lower bound . for example , consider the partition @xmath171 defined as follows : i^odd=\{1,3, ,n-1 } j^even=\{2,4, ,n } [ eq : part_odd_even ] this partition splits all size-@xmath1 patch groups ( @xmath172 ) , leading to a lower bound that is exponential in the number of patches ( @xmath6 ) . the upper bound in theorem [ theorem : deep_mat_rank_bounds ] is expressed via constants @xmath173 , defined recursively over levels @xmath68 , with @xmath151 ranging over @xmath174 for each level @xmath69 . what prevents @xmath173 from growing double - exponentially fast ( w.r.t . @xmath69 ) is the minimization with @xmath175 . specifically , if @xmath176 is small , _ i.e. _ if the partition induced by @xmath23 on the @xmath151th size-@xmath157 group of patches is unbalanced ( most of the patches belong to one side of the partition , and only a few belong to the other ) , @xmath173 will be of reasonable size . the higher this takes place in the hierarchy ( _ i.e. _ the larger @xmath69 is ) , the lower our eventual upper bound will be . in other words , if partitions induced by @xmath23 on size-@xmath157 patch groups are unbalanced for large values of @xmath69 , the upper bound in theorem [ theorem : deep_mat_rank_bounds ] will be small . for example , consider the partition @xmath177 defined by : i^low=\{1, ,n/2 } j^high=\{n/2 + 1, ,n } [ eq : part_low_high ] under @xmath177 , all partitions induced on size-@xmath152 patch groups ( quadrants of @xmath24 $ ] ) are completely one - sided ( @xmath178 for all @xmath147 $ ] ) , resulting in the upper bound being no greater than @xmath73 linear in network size . to summarize this discussion , theorem [ theorem : deep_mat_rank_bounds ] states that with the deep network , the maximal rank of a coefficient tensor matricization w.r.t . @xmath23 , highly depends on the nature of the partition @xmath23 it will be exponentially high for partitions such as @xmath171 , that split many size-@xmath1 patch groups , while being only polynomial ( or linear ) for partitions like @xmath177 , under which size-@xmath157 patch groups are unevenly divided for large values of @xmath69 . since the rank of a coefficient tensor matricization w.r.t . @xmath23 corresponds to the strength of correlation modeled between input patches indexed by @xmath25 and those indexed by @xmath26 ( sec . [ sec : analysis : sep2mat ] ) , we conclude that the ability of a polynomially sized deep network to model correlation between sets of input patches highly depends on the nature of these sets . we now turn to study correlations modeled by the shallow network presented in sec . [ sec : cac ] ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](b ) ) . in line with sec . [ sec : analysis : sep2mat ] , this is achieved by characterizing the maximal ranks of coefficient tensor matricizations under different partitions . recall from eq . [ eq : cp_decomp ] the cp decomposition expressing a coefficient tensor @xmath102 realized by the shallow network . for an arbitrary partition @xmath23 of @xmath24 $ ] , _ i.e. _ @xmath117 $ ] , matricizing this decomposition with repeated application of the relation in eq . [ eq : mat_tensor_prod ] , gives the following expression for @xmath119 the matricization w.r.t . @xmath23 of a coefficient tensor realized by the shallow network : ^y_i , j=_=1^r_0 a^1,y _ ( ^a^0 , ) ( ^a^0,)^[eq : mat_cp_decomp ] @xmath179 and @xmath180 here are column vectors of dimensions @xmath181 and @xmath182 respectively , standing for the kronecker products of @xmath183 with itself @xmath184 and @xmath185 times ( respectively ) . [ eq : mat_cp_decomp ] immediately leads to two observations regarding the ranks that may be taken by @xmath119 . first , they depend on the partition @xmath23 only through its division size , _ i.e. _ through @xmath184 and @xmath185 . second , they are no greater than @xmath186 , meaning that the maximal rank is linear ( or less ) in network size . in light of sec . [ sec : analysis : sep2mat ] and [ sec : analysis : deep ] , these findings imply that in contrast to the deep network , which with polynomial size supports exponential separation ranks under favored partitions , the shallow network treats all partitions ( of a given division size ) equally , and can only give rise to an exponential separation rank if its size is exponential . suppose now that we would like to use the shallow network to replicate a function realized by a polynomially sized deep network . so long as the deep network s function admits an exponential separation rank under at least one of the favored partitions ( _ e.g. _ @xmath171 eq . [ eq : part_odd_even ] ) , the shallow network would have to be exponentially large in order to replicate it , _ i.e. _ depth efficiency takes place . ) are not universal . in particular , it may very well be that a function realized by a polynomially sized deep network can not be replicated by the shallow network , no matter how large ( wide ) we allow it to be . in such scenarios depth efficiency does not provide insight into the complexity of functions brought forth by depth . to obtain a shallow network that is universal , thus an appropriate gauge for depth efficiency , we may remove the constraint of weight sharing , _ i.e. _ allow the filters in the hidden conv operator to hold different weights at different spatial locations ( see for proof that this indeed leads to universality ) . all results we have established for the original shallow network remain valid when weight sharing is removed . in particular , the separation ranks of the network are still linear in its size . this implies that as suggested , depth efficiency indeed holds . ] since all but a negligible set of the functions realizable by the deep network give rise to maximal separation ranks ( sec [ sec : analysis : sep2mat ] ) , we obtain the complete depth efficiency result of . however , unlike , which did not provide any explanation for the usefulness of functions brought forth by depth , we obtain an insight into their utility they are able to efficiently model strong correlation under favored partitions of the input . the deep network presented in sec . [ sec : cac ] , whose correlations we analyzed in sec . [ sec : analysis : deep ] , was defined as having size-@xmath1 pooling windows , _ i.e. _ pooling windows covering four entries each . we have yet to specify the shapes of these windows , or equivalently , the spatial ( two - dimensional ) locations of nodes grouped together in the process of pooling . in compliance with standard convolutional network design , we now assume that the network s ( size-@xmath1 ) pooling windows are contiguous square blocks , _ i.e. _ have shape @xmath187 . under this configuration , the network s functional description ( eq . [ eq : h_y ] with @xmath102 given by eq . [ eq : hr_decomp ] ) induces a spatial ordering of input patches ) , the nodes corresponding to patches @xmath188 are pooled into one group , those corresponding to @xmath189 are pooled into another , and so forth . similar assumptions hold for the deeper layers . for example , in the second pooling operation ( hidden layer @xmath4 ) , the node with receptive field @xmath190 , _ i.e. _ the one corresponding to the quadruple of patches @xmath191 , is assumed to be pooled together with the nodes whose receptive fields are @xmath192 , @xmath193 and @xmath194 . ] , which may be described by the following recursive process : * set the index of the top - left patch to @xmath4 . * for @xmath195 : replicate the already - assigned top - left @xmath196-by-@xmath196 block of indexes , and place copies on its right , bottom - right and bottom . then , add a @xmath197 offset to all indexes in the right copy , a @xmath198 offset to all indexes in the bottom - right copy , and a @xmath199 offset to all indexes in the bottom copy . with this spatial ordering ( illustrated in fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](c ) ) , partitions @xmath23 of @xmath24 $ ] convey a spatial pattern . for example , the partition @xmath171 ( eq . [ eq : part_odd_even ] ) corresponds to the pattern illustrated on the left of fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](c ) , whereas @xmath177 ( eq . [ eq : part_low_high ] ) corresponds to the pattern illustrated on the right . our analysis ( sec . [ sec : analysis : deep ] ) shows that the deep network is able to model strong correlation under @xmath171 , while being inefficient for modeling correlation under @xmath177 . more generally , partitions for which @xmath170 , defined in theorem [ theorem : deep_mat_rank_bounds ] , is high , convey patterns that split many @xmath187 patch blocks , _ i.e. _ are highly entangled . these partitions enjoy the possibility of strong correlation . on the other hand , partitions for which @xmath176 is small for large values of @xmath69 ( see eq . [ eq:_i_lk_j_lk ] for definition of @xmath161 and @xmath162 ) convey patterns that divide large @xmath200 patch blocks unevenly , _ i.e. _ separate the input to distinct contiguous regions . these partitions , as we have seen , suffer from limited low correlations . we conclude that with @xmath187 pooling , the deep network is able to model strong correlation between input regions that are highly entangled , at the expense of being inefficient for modeling correlation between input regions that are far apart . had we selected a different pooling regime , the preference of input partition patterns in terms of modeled correlation would change . for example , if pooling windows were set to group nodes with their spatial reflections ( horizontal , vertical and horizontal - vertical ) , coarse patterns that divide the input symmetrically , such as the one illustrated on the right of fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](c ) , would enjoy the possibility of strong correlation , whereas many entangled patterns would now suffer from limited low correlation . the choice of pooling shapes thus serves as a means for controlling the inductive bias in terms of correlations modeled between input regions . square contiguous windows , as commonly employed in practice , lead to a preference that complies with our intuition regarding the statistics of natural images ( nearby pixels more correlated than distant ones ) . other pooling schemes lead to different preferences , and this allows tailoring a network to data that departs from the usual domain of natural imagery . we demonstrate this experimentally in the next section , where it is shown how different pooling geometries lead to superior performance in different tasks . the main conclusion from our analyses ( sec . [ sec : analysis ] and [ sec : inductive_bias ] ) is that the pooling geometry of a deep convolutional network controls its inductive bias by determining which correlations between input regions can be modeled efficiently . we have also seen that shallow networks can not model correlations efficiently , regardless of the considered input regions . in this section we validate these assertions empirically , not only with convolutional arithmetic circuits ( subject of our analyses ) , but also with convolutional rectifier networks convolutional networks with relu activation and max or average pooling . for conciseness , we defer to app . [ app : impl ] some details regarding our implementation . the latter is fully available online at https://github.com/huji-deep/inductive-pooling . our experiments are based on a synthetic classification benchmark inspired by medical imaging tasks . instances to be classified are @xmath56-by-@xmath56 binary images , each displaying a random distorted oval shape ( _ blob _ ) with missing pixels in its interior ( _ holes _ ) . for each image , two continuous scores in range @xmath201 $ ] are computed . the first , referred to as _ closedness _ , reflects how morphologically closed a blob is , and is defined to be the ratio between the number of pixels in the blob , and the number of pixels in its closure ( see app . [ app : morph_closure ] for exact definition of the latter ) . the second score , named _ symmetry _ , reflects the degree to which a blob is left - right symmetric about its center . it is measured by cropping the bounding box around a blob , applying a left - right flip to the latter , and computing the ratio between the number of pixels in the intersection of the blob and its reflection , and the number of pixels in the blob . to generate labeled sets for classification ( train and test ) , we render multiple images , sort them according to their closedness and symmetry , and for each of the two scores , assign the label `` high '' to the top 40% and the label `` low '' to the bottom 40% ( the mid 20% are considered ill - defined ) . this creates two binary ( two - class ) classification tasks one for closedness and one for symmetry ( see fig . [ fig : exp_data ] for a sample of images participating in both tasks ) . given that closedness is a property of a local nature , we expect its classification task to require a predictor to be able to model strong correlations between neighboring pixels . symmetry on the other hand is a property that relates pixels to their reflections , thus we expect its classification task to demand that a predictor be able to model correlations across distances . we evaluated the deep convolutional arithmetic circuit considered throughout the paper ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) with size-@xmath1 pooling windows ) under two different pooling geometries . the first , referred to as _ , comprises standard @xmath187 pooling windows . the second , dubbed _ mirror _ , pools together nodes with their horizontal , vertical and horizontal - vertical reflections . in both cases , input patches ( @xmath116 ) were set as individual pixels , resulting in @xmath58 patches and @xmath202 hidden layers . @xmath203 representation functions ( @xmath75 ) were fixed , the first realizing the identity on binary inputs ( @xmath204 for @xmath205 ) , and the second realizing negation ( @xmath206 for @xmath205 ) . classification was realized through @xmath207 network outputs , with prediction following the stronger activation . the number of channels across all hidden layers was uniform , and varied between @xmath208 and @xmath209 . [ fig : exp_results_cac_pool4 ] shows the results of applying the deep network with both square and mirror pooling , to both closedness and symmetry tasks , where each of the latter has @xmath210 images for training and @xmath211 images for testing . as can be seen in the figure , square pooling significantly outperforms mirror pooling in closedness classification , whereas the opposite occurs in symmetry classification . this complies with our discussion in sec . [ sec : inductive_bias ] , according to which square pooling supports modeling correlations between entangled ( neighboring ) regions of the input , whereas mirror pooling puts focus on correlations between input regions that are symmetric w.r.t . one another . we thus obtain a demonstration of how prior knowledge regarding a task at hand may be used to tailor the inductive bias of a deep convolutional network by designing an appropriate pooling geometry . in addition to the deep network , we also evaluated the shallow convolutional arithmetic circuit analyzed in the paper ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](b ) ) . the architectural choices for this network were the same as those described above for the deep network besides the number of hidden channels , which in this case applied to the network s single hidden layer , and varied between @xmath212 and @xmath213 . the highest train and test accuracies delivered by this network ( with @xmath213 hidden channels ) were roughly @xmath214 on closedness task , and @xmath215 on symmetry task . the fact that these accuracies are inferior to those of the deep network , even when the latter s pooling geometry is not optimal for the task at hand , complies with our analysis in sec . [ sec : analysis ] . namely , it complies with the observation that separation ranks ( correlations ) are sometimes exponential and sometimes polynomial with the deep network , whereas with the shallow one they are never more than linear in network size . finally , to assess the validity of our findings for convolutional networks in general , not just convolutional arithmetic circuits , we repeated the above experiments with convolutional rectifier networks . namely , we placed relu activations after every conv operator , switched the pooling operation from product to average , and re - evaluated the deep ( square and mirror pooling geometries ) and shallow networks . we then reiterated this process once more , with pooling operation set to max instead of average . the results obtained by the deep networks are presented in fig . [ fig : exp_results_crn_pool4 ] . the shallow network with average pooling reached train / test accuracies of roughly @xmath216 on closedness task , and @xmath217 on symmetry task . with max pooling , performance of the shallow network did not exceed chance . altogether , convolutional rectifier networks exhibit the same phenomena observed with convolutional arithmetic circuits , indicating that the conclusions from our analyses likely apply to such networks as well . formal adaptation of the analyses to convolutional rectifier networks , similarly to the adaptation of carried out in , is left for future work . through the notion of separation rank , we studied the relation between the architecture of a convolutional network , and its ability to model correlations among input regions . for a given input partition , the separation rank quantifies how far a function is from separability , which in a probabilistic setting , corresponds to statistical independence between sides of the partition . our analysis shows that a polynomially sized deep convolutional arithmetic circuit supports exponentially high separation ranks for certain input partitions , while being limited to polynomial or linear ( in network size ) separation ranks for others . the network s pooling window shapes effectively determine which input partitions are favored in terms of separation rank , _ i.e. _ which partitions enjoy the possibility of exponentially high separation ranks with polynomial network size , and which require network to be exponentially large . pooling geometry thus serves as a means for controlling the inductive bias . the particular pooling scheme commonly employed in practice square contiguous windows , favors interleaved partitions over ones that divide the input to distinct areas , thus orients the inductive bias towards the statistics of natural images ( nearby pixels more correlated than distant ones ) . other pooling schemes lead to different preferences , and this allows tailoring the network to data that departs from the usual domain of natural imagery . as opposed to deep convolutional arithmetic circuits , shallow ones support only linear ( in network size ) separation ranks . therefore , in order to replicate a function realized by a deep network ( exponential separation rank ) , a shallow network must be exponentially large . by this we derive the depth efficiency result of , but in addition , provide an insight into the benefit of functions brought forth by depth they are able to efficiently model strong correlation under favored partitions of the input . we validated our conclusions empirically , with convolutional arithmetic circuits as well as convolutional rectifier networks convolutional networks with relu activation and max or average pooling . our experiments demonstrate how different pooling geometries lead to superior performance in different tasks . specifically , we evaluate deep networks in the measurement of shape continuity , a task of a local nature , and show that standard square pooling windows outperform ones that join together nodes with their spatial reflections . in contrast , when measuring shape symmetry , modeling correlations across distances is of vital importance , and the latter pooling geometry is superior to the conventional one . shallow networks are inefficient at modeling correlations of any kind , and indeed lead to poor performance on both tasks . finally , our analyses and results bring forth the possibility of expanding the coverage of correlations efficiently modeled by a deep convolutional network . specifically , by blending together multiple pooling geometries in the hidden layers of a network , it is possible to facilitate simultaneous support for a wide variety of correlations suiting data of different types . investigation of this direction , from both theoretical and empirical perspectives , is viewed as a promising avenue for future research . this work is supported by intel grant icri - ci # 9 - 2012 - 6133 , by isf center grant 1790/12 and by the european research council ( theorydl project ) . nadav cohen is supported by a google doctoral fellowship in machine learning . we prove the equality in two steps , first showing that @xmath218 , and then establishing the converse . the first step is elementary , and does not make use of the representation functions ( @xmath75 ) linear independence , or of measurability / square - integrability . the second step does rely on these assumptions , and employs slightly more advanced mathematical machinery . throughout the proof , we assume without loss of generality that the partition @xmath23 of @xmath24 $ ] is such that @xmath25 takes on lower values , while @xmath26 takes on higher ones . that is to say , we assume that @xmath219 and @xmath220 . and @xmath29 , and define an auxiliary function @xmath221 by permuting the entries of @xmath101 such that those indexed by @xmath25 are on the left and those indexed by @xmath26 on the right , _ i.e. _ @xmath222 . obviously @xmath223 , where the partition @xmath224 is defined by @xmath225 and @xmath226 . analogously to the definition of @xmath221 , let @xmath227 be the tensor obtained by permuting the modes of @xmath102 such that those indexed by @xmath25 are on the left and those indexed by @xmath26 on the right , _ it is not difficult to see that matricizing @xmath229 w.r.t . @xmath224 is equivalent to matricizing @xmath230 w.r.t . @xmath23 , _ i.e. _ @xmath231 , and in particular @xmath232 . moreover , since by definition @xmath230 is a coefficient tensor corresponding to @xmath101 ( eq . [ eq : h_y ] ) , @xmath227 will be a coefficient tensor that corresponds to @xmath221 . now , our proof will show that @xmath233 , which , in light of the equalities above , implies @xmath145 , as required . ] to prove that @xmath218 , denote by @xmath234 the rank of @xmath119 . the latter is an @xmath181-by-@xmath182 matrix , thus there exist vectors @xmath235 and @xmath236 such that @xmath237 . for every @xmath238 $ ] , let @xmath239 be the tensor of order @xmath184 and dimension @xmath62 in each mode whose arrangement as a column vector gives @xmath240 , _ i.e. _ whose matricization w.r.t . the partition @xmath241,\emptyset)$ ] is equal to @xmath240 . similarly , let @xmath242 , @xmath238 $ ] , be the tensor of order @xmath243 and dimension @xmath62 in each mode whose matricization w.r.t . the partition @xmath244)$ ] ( arrangement as a row vector ) is equal to @xmath245 . it holds that : ^y_i , j & = & _ = 1^ru_v_^ + & = & _ = 1^r^_[],^ _ , [ ] + & = & _ = 1^r^_i , j^_(i-),(j- ) + & = & _ = 1^r^^_i , j + & = & _ = 1^rb^^_i , j where the third equality relies on the assumption @xmath246 , the fourth equality makes use of the relation in eq . [ eq : mat_tensor_prod ] , and the last equality is based on the linearity of the matricization operator . since matricizations are merely rearrangements of tensors , the fact that @xmath247 implies @xmath248 , or equivalently , @xmath249 for every @xmath250 $ ] . plugging this into eq . [ eq : h_y ] gives : h_y(x_1, ,x_n ) & = & _ d_1 d_n=1^ma_d_1 d_n^y_i=1^n f__d_i(x_i ) + & = & _ d_1 d_n=1^m_=1^rb^_d_1 d_c^_d_+1 d_n_i=1^n f__d_i(x_i ) + & = & _ = 1^r(_d_1 d_=1^mb^_d_1 d__i=1^ f__d_i(x_i ) ) + & & ( _ d_+1 d_n=1^mc^_d_+1 d_n_i=+1^n f__d_i(x_i ) ) [ eq : mat_rank_over_sep_rank ] for every @xmath238 $ ] , define the functions @xmath251 and @xmath252 as follows : g_(x_1, ,x _ ) & : = & _ d_1 d_=1^mb^_d_1 d__i=1^ f__d_i(x_i ) + g_(x_1, ,x _ ) & : = & _ d_1 d_=1^mc^_d_1 d__i=1^ f__d_i(x_i ) substituting these into eq . [ eq : mat_rank_over_sep_rank ] leads to : @xmath253 which by definition of the separation rank ( eq . [ eq : sep_rank ] ) , implies @xmath254 . by this we have shown that @xmath218 , as required . for proving the converse inequality , _ i.e. _ @xmath255 , we rely on basic concepts and results from functional analysis , or more specifically , from the topic of @xmath0 spaces . while a full introduction to this topic is beyond our scope ( the interested reader is referred to @xcite ) , we briefly lay out here the minimal background required in order to follow our proof . for any @xmath256 , @xmath257 is formally defined as the hilbert space of lebesgue measurable square - integrable real functions over @xmath258 on which they differ has measure zero . ] , equipped with standard ( point - wise ) addition and scalar multiplication , as well as the inner product defined by integration over point - wise multiplication . for our purposes , @xmath257 may simply be thought of as the ( infinite - dimensional ) vector space of functions @xmath259 satisfying @xmath260 , with inner product defined by @xmath261 . our proof will make use of the following basic facts related to @xmath0 spaces : [ fact : orth_decomp ] if @xmath262 is a finite - dimensional subspace of @xmath257 , then any @xmath263 may be expressed as @xmath264 , with @xmath265 and @xmath266 ( _ i.e. _ @xmath267 is orthogonal to all elements in @xmath262 ) . moreover , such a representation is unique , so in the case where @xmath268 , we necessarily have @xmath269 and @xmath270 . [ fact : prod ] if @xmath271 , then the function @xmath272 belongs to @xmath273 . [ fact : prod_orth ] let @xmath262 and @xmath274 be finite - dimensional subspaces of @xmath275 and @xmath276 respectively , and define @xmath277 to be the subspace spanned by @xmath278 . given @xmath271 , consider the function @xmath272 in @xmath273 . this function belongs to @xmath279 if @xmath280 or @xmath281 . [ fact : prod_ind ] if @xmath282 are linearly independent , then for any @xmath283 , the set of functions @xmath284}$ ] is linearly independent in @xmath285 . to facilitate application of the theory of @xmath0 spaces , we now make use of the assumption that the network s representation functions @xmath75 , as well as the functions @xmath144 in the definition of separation rank ( eq . [ eq : sep_rank ] ) , are measurable and square - integrable . taking into account the expression given in eq . [ eq : h_y ] for @xmath101 , as well as fact [ fact : prod ] above , one readily sees that @xmath286 implies @xmath287 . the separation rank @xmath138 will be the minimal non - negative integer @xmath234 such that there exist @xmath288 and @xmath289 for which : h_y(x_1, ,x_n)=_=1^rg_(x_1, ,x_)g_(x_+1, ,x_n ) [ eq : h_y_sep ] we would like to show that @xmath255 . our strategy for achieving this will be to start from eq . [ eq : h_y_sep ] , and derive an expression for @xmath119 comprising a sum of @xmath234 rank-@xmath4 matrices . as an initial step along this path , define the following finite - dimensional subspaces : v&:=&span\{(x_1, ,x_)_i=1^f__d_i(x_i)}_d_1 d _ l^2((r^s)^ ) [ eq : v ] + v&:=&span\{(x_1, ,x_)_i=1^f__d_i(x_i)}_d_1 d _ l^2((r^s)^ ) [ eq : vpr ] + u&:=&span\{(x_1, ,x_n)_i=1^nf__d_i(x_i)}_d_1 d_n l^2((r^s)^n ) [ eq : u ] notice that @xmath290 ( eq . [ eq : h_y ] ) , and that @xmath291 is the span of products from @xmath262 and @xmath274 , _ i.e. _ : u = span\{(x_1, ,x_n)p(x_1, ,x_)p(x_+1, ,x_n):pv , pv } [ eq : u_prod_v_vpr ] returning to eq . [ eq : h_y_sep ] , we apply fact [ fact : orth_decomp ] to obtain orthogonal decompositions of @xmath292 w.r.t . @xmath262 , and of @xmath293 w.r.t . this gives @xmath294 , @xmath295 , @xmath296 and @xmath297 , such that @xmath298 and @xmath299 for every @xmath238 $ ] . plug this into eq . [ eq : h_y_sep ] : h_y(x_1, ,x_n ) & = & _ = 1^rg_(x_1, ,x_)g_(x_+1, ,x_n ) + & = & _ = 1^r(p_(x_1, ,x_)+_(x_1, ,x _ ) ) + & & ( p_(x_+1, ,x_n)+_(x_+1, ,x_n ) ) + & = & _ = 1^rp_(x_1, ,x_)p_(x_+1, ,x_n ) + & & + _ = 1^rp_(x_1, ,x_)_(x_+1, ,x_n ) + & & + _ = 1^r_(x_1, ,x_)p_(x_+1, ,x_n ) + & & + _ = 1^r_(x_1, ,x_)_(x_+1, ,x_n ) given that @xmath291 is the span of products from @xmath262 and @xmath274 ( eq . [ eq : u_prod_v_vpr ] ) , and that @xmath300 , one readily sees that the first term in the latter expression belongs to @xmath291 , while , according to fact [ fact : prod_orth ] , the second , third and fourth terms are orthogonal to @xmath291 . we thus obtained an orthogonal decomposition of @xmath101 w.r.t . @xmath291 . since @xmath101 is contained in @xmath291 , the orthogonal component must vanish ( fact [ fact : orth_decomp ] ) , and we amount at : h_y(x_1, ,x_n)=_=1^rp_(x_1, ,x_)p_(x_+1, ,x_n ) [ eq : h_y_sep_subspace ] for every @xmath238 $ ] , let @xmath239 and @xmath242 be coefficient tensors of @xmath301 and @xmath302 w.r.t . the functions that span @xmath262 and @xmath274 ( eq . [ eq : v ] and [ eq : vpr ] ) , respectively . put formally , @xmath239 and @xmath242 are tensors of orders @xmath184 and @xmath185 ( respectively ) , with dimension @xmath62 in each mode , meeting : p_(x_1, ,x _ ) & = & _ d_1 d_=1^mb^_d_1 d__i=1^ f__d_i(x_i ) + p_(x_1, ,x _ ) & = & _ d_1 d_=1^mc^_d_1 d__i=1^ f__d_i(x_i ) substitute into eq . [ eq : h_y_sep_subspace ] : h_y(x_1, ,x_n ) & = & _ = 1^r(_d_1 d_=1^mb^_d_1 d__i=1^ f__d_i(x_i ) ) + & & ( _ d_+1 d_n=1^mc^_d_+1 d_n_i=+1^n f__d_i(x_i ) ) + & = & _ = 1^r_d_1 d_n=1^mb^_d_1 d_n_i=1^n f__d_i(x_i ) + & = & _ d_1 d_n=1^m(_=1^rb^_d_1 d_c^_d_+1 d_n)_i=1^n f__d_i(x_i ) compare this expression for @xmath101 to that given in eq . [ eq : h_y ] : _ d_1 d_n=1^m(_=1^rb^_d_1 d_c^_d_+1 d_n)_i=1^n f__d_i(x_i ) = _ d_1 d_n=1^ma_d_1 d_n^y_i=1^n f__d_i(x_i ) [ eq : h_y_compare ] at this point we utilize the given linear independence of @xmath286 , from which it follows ( fact [ fact : prod_ind ] ) that the functions spanning @xmath291 ( eq . [ eq : u ] ) are linearly independent in @xmath303 . both sides of eq . [ eq : h_y_compare ] are linear combinations of these functions , thus their coefficients must coincide : @xmath304 } ~~\longleftrightarrow~~ { { \mathcal a}}^y=\sum\nolimits_{\nu=1}^r{{\mathcal b}}^{\nu}\otimes{{\mathcal c}}^{\nu}\ ] ] matricizing the tensor equation on the right w.r.t . @xmath23 gives : ^y_i , j & = & _ = 1^rb^^_i , j + & = & _ = 1^r^^_i , j + & = & _ = 1^r^_i , j^_(i-),(j- ) + & = & _ = 1^r^_[],^ _ , [ ] where the second equality is based on the linearity of the matricization operator , the third equality relies on the relation in eq . [ eq : mat_tensor_prod ] , and the last equality makes use of the assumption @xmath246 . for every @xmath238 $ ] , @xmath305,\emptyset}$ ] is a column vector of dimension @xmath181 and @xmath306}$ ] is a row vector of dimension @xmath182 . denoting these by @xmath240 and @xmath245 respectively , we may write : @xmath307 this shows that @xmath308 . since @xmath234 is a general non - negative integer that admits eq . [ eq : h_y_sep ] , we may take it to be minimal , _ i.e. _ to be equal to @xmath138 the separation rank of @xmath101 w.r.t . @xmath23 . by this we obtain @xmath309 , which is what we set out to prove . the claim is framed in measure theoretical terms , and in accordance , so will its proof be . while a complete introduction to measure theory is beyond our scope ( the interested reader is referred to @xcite ) , we briefly convey here the intuition behind the concepts we will be using , as well as facts we rely upon . the _ lebesgue measure _ is defined over sets in a euclidean space , and may be interpreted as quantifying their `` volume '' . for example , the lebesgue measure of a unit hypercube is one , of the entire space is infinity , and of a finite set of points is zero . in this context , when a phenomenon is said to occur _ almost everywhere _ , it means that the set of points in which it does not occur has lebesgue measure zero , _ i.e. _ is negligible . an important result we will make use of ( proven in @xcite for example ) is the following . given a polynomial defined over @xmath310 real variables , the set of points in @xmath258 on which it vanishes is either the entire space ( when the polynomial in question is the zero polynomial ) , or it must have lebesgue measure zero . in other words , if a polynomial is not identically zero , it must be different from zero almost everywhere . heading on to the proof , we recall from sec . [ sec : cac ] that the entries of the coefficient tensor @xmath102 ( eq . [ eq : h_y ] ) are given by polynomials in the network s conv weights @xmath99 and output weights @xmath81 . since @xmath119 the matricization of @xmath102 w.r.t . the partition @xmath23 , is merely a rearrangement of the tensor as a matrix , this matrix too has entries given by polynomials in the network s linear weights . now , denote by @xmath311 the maximal rank taken by @xmath119 as network weights vary , and consider a specific setting of weights for which this rank is attained . we may assume without loss of generality that under this setting , the top - left @xmath311-by-@xmath311 block of @xmath119 is non - singular . the corresponding minor , _ i.e. _ the determinant of the sub - matrix @xmath312 , is thus a polynomial defined over @xmath99 and @xmath81 which is not identically zero . in light of the above , this polynomial is different from zero almost everywhere , implying that @xmath313 almost everywhere . since @xmath314 , and since by definition @xmath311 is the maximal rank that @xmath119 can take , we have that @xmath120 is maximal almost everywhere . the matrix decomposition in eq . [ eq : mat_hr_decomp ] expresses @xmath31 in terms of the network s linear weights @xmath104}$ ] for conv operator in hidden layer @xmath86 , @xmath105}$ ] for conv operator in hidden layer @xmath106 , and @xmath315 for node @xmath82 of dense output operator . we prove lower and upper bounds on the maximal rank that @xmath31 can take as these weights vary . our proof relies on the rank - multiplicative property of the kronecker product ( @xmath158 for any real matrices @xmath316 and @xmath317 see @xcite for proof ) , but is otherwise elementary . beginning with the lower bound , consider the following weight setting ( @xmath318 here stands for a vector holding @xmath4 in entry @xmath80 and @xmath86 at all other entries , @xmath319 stands for a vector holding @xmath86 at all entries , and @xmath320 stands for a vector holding @xmath4 at all entries , with the dimension of a vector to be understood by context ) : a^0 , & = & \ { ll e _ & , \{r_0,m } + 0 & , . [ eq : weight_setting ] + a^1 , & = & \ { ll 1 & , = 1 + 0 & , . + a^l , & = & \ { ll e_1 & , = 1 + 0 & , . + a^l , y & = & e_1 let @xmath321 $ ] . recalling the definition of @xmath161 and @xmath162 from eq . [ eq:_i_lk_j_lk ] , consider the sets @xmath322 and @xmath323 , as well as @xmath324 and @xmath325 for @xmath326 $ ] . @xmath327 is a partition of @xmath328 $ ] , _ i.e. _ @xmath329 $ ] , and for every @xmath326 $ ] we have @xmath330 and @xmath331 if @xmath332 belongs to @xmath322 , and otherwise @xmath333 and @xmath334 if @xmath332 belongs to @xmath323 . this implies that for an arbitrary vector @xmath335 , the matricization @xmath336 is equal to @xmath335 if @xmath337 , and to @xmath338 if @xmath339 . accordingly , for any @xmath340 $ ] : @xmath341 assume that @xmath342 . by our setting @xmath343 , so the above matrix holds @xmath4 in a single entry and @xmath86 in all the rest . moreover , if the matrix is not a row or column vector , _ i.e. _ if both @xmath322 and @xmath323 are non - empty , the column index and row index of the entry holding @xmath4 are both unique w.r.t . @xmath80 , _ i.e. _ they do not repeat as @xmath80 ranges over @xmath344 . we thus have : @xmath345 since we set @xmath346 and @xmath347 for @xmath348 , we may write : @xmath349 the latter matrix is by definition equal to @xmath350 ( see top row of eq . [ eq : mat_hr_decomp ] ) , and so for every @xmath321 $ ] : rank^1,1_i_1,n , j_1,n=\ { ll \{r_0,m } & , i_1,n j_1,n + 1 & , i_1,n= j_1,n= . [ eq : phi_1_1_rank ] now , the fact that we set @xmath351 and @xmath352 for @xmath353 , implies that the second to last levels of the decomposition in eq . [ eq : mat_hr_decomp ] collapse to : @xmath354 applying the rank - multiplicative property of the kronecker product , and plugging in eq . [ eq : phi_1_1_rank ] , we obtain : @xmath355 where @xmath356 : i_{1,t}\neq\emptyset \wedge j_{1,t}\neq\emptyset\ } \right\rvert}$ ] . this equality holds for the specific weight setting we defined in eq . [ eq : weight_setting ] . maximizing over all weight settings gives the sought after lower bound : @xmath357 moving on to the upper bound , we show by induction over @xmath106 that for any @xmath160 $ ] and @xmath358 $ ] , the rank of @xmath359 is no greater than @xmath173 , regardless of the chosen weight setting . for the base case @xmath360 we have : @xmath361 the @xmath362-by-@xmath363 matrix @xmath364 is given here as a sum of @xmath365 rank-1 terms , thus obviously its rank is no greater than @xmath366 . since by definition @xmath367 for all @xmath368 $ ] , we may write : @xmath369 @xmath370 is defined by the right hand side of this inequality , so our inductive hypotheses holds for @xmath360 . for @xmath371 : @xmath372 taking ranks : rank^l,_i_l , k , j_l , k & = & rank(_=1^r_l-1 a_^l , ^l-1,_i_l-1,4(k-1)+t , j_l-1,4(k-1)+t ) + & & _ = 1^r_l-1 rank ( ^l-1,_i_l-1,4(k-1)+t , j_l-1,4(k-1)+t ) + & = & _ = 1^r_l-1_t=1 ^ 4 rank^l-1,_i_l-1,4(k-1)+t , j_l-1,4(k-1)+t + & & _ = 1^r_l-1_t=1 ^ 4 c^l-1,4(k-1)+t + & = & r_l-1_t=1 ^ 4 c^l-1,4(k-1)+t where we used rank sub - additivity in the second line , the rank - multiplicative property of the kronecker product in the third line , and our inductive hypotheses for @xmath373 in the fourth line . since the number rows and columns in @xmath359 is @xmath374 and @xmath375 respectively , we may incorporate these terms into the inequality , obtaining : @xmath376 the right hand side here is equal to @xmath173 by definition , so our inductive hypotheses indeed holds for all @xmath106 . to establish the sought after upper bound on the rank of @xmath119 , we recall that the latter is given by : @xmath153 carry out a series of steps similar to before , while making use of our inductive hypotheses for @xmath72 : rank^y_i , j & = & rank(_=1^r_l-1 a_^l , y ^l-1,_i_l-1,t , j_l-1,t ) + & & _ = 1^r_l-1 rank ( ^l-1,_i_l-1,t , j_l-1,t ) + & = & _ = 1^r_l-1_t=1 ^ 4 rank^l-1,_i_l-1,t , j_l-1,t + & & _ = 1^r_l-1_t=1 ^ 4 c^l-1,t + & = & r_l-1_t=1 ^ 4 c^l-1,t since @xmath119 has @xmath377 rows and @xmath378 columns , we may include these terms in the inequality , thus reaching the upper bound we set out to prove . our analysis of correlations modeled by convolutional networks is based on the concept of separation rank , conveyed in sec . [ sec : sep_rank ] . when the separation rank of a function w.r.t . a partition of its input is equal to @xmath4 , the function is separable , meaning it does not model any interaction between sides of the partition . we argued that the higher the separation rank , the farther the function is from this situation , _ i.e. _ the stronger the correlation it induces between sides of the partition . in the current appendix we formalize this argument , by relating separation rank to the @xmath0 distance from the set of separable functions . we begin by defining and characterizing a normalized ( scale invariant ) version of this distance ( app . [ app : sep_rank_l2:normalized_dist ] ) . it is then shown ( app . [ app : sep_rank_l2:ub_sep_rank ] ) that separation rank provides an upper bound on the normalized distance . finally , a lower bound that applies to deep convolutional arithmetic circuits is derived ( app . [ app : sep_rank_l2:lb_cac ] ) , based on the lower bound for their separation ranks established in sec . [ sec : analysis : deep ] . together , these steps imply that our entire analysis , facilitated by upper and lower bounds on separation ranks of convolutional arithmetic circuits , can be interpreted as based on upper and lower bounds on ( normalized ) @xmath0 distances from separable functions . in the text hereafter , we assume familiarity of the reader with the contents of sec . [ sec : prelim ] , [ sec : cac ] , [ sec : sep_rank ] , [ sec : analysis ] and the proofs given in app . [ app : proofs ] . we also rely on basic knowledge in the topic of @xmath0 spaces ( see discussion in app . [ app : proofs : sep_mat_ranks_equal ] for minimal background required in order to follow our arguments ) , as well as several results concerning singular values of matrices . in line with sec . [ sec : analysis ] , an assumption throughout this appendix is that all functions in question are measurable and square - integrable ( _ i.e. _ belong to @xmath0 over the respective euclidean space ) , and in app . [ app : sep_rank_l2:lb_cac ] , we also make use of the fact that representation functions ( @xmath75 ) of a convolutional arithmetic circuit can be regarded as linearly independent ( see sec . [ sec : analysis : sep2mat ] ) . finally , for convenience , we now fix @xmath23 an arbitrary partition of @xmath24 $ ] . specifically , @xmath25 and @xmath26 are disjoint subsets of @xmath24 $ ] whose union gives @xmath24 $ ] , denoted by @xmath27 with @xmath28 , and @xmath29 with @xmath30 . for a function @xmath128 ( which is not identically zero ) , the _ normalized @xmath0 distance from the set of separable functions w.r.t . @xmath23 _ , is defined as follows : d(h;i , j):=_h(x_1, ,x_n)-g(x_i_1, ,x_i_)g(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) [ eq : normalized_dist ] where @xmath379 refers to the norm of @xmath0 space , _ e.g. _ @xmath380 . in words , @xmath137 is defined as the minimal @xmath0 distance between @xmath127 and a function that is separable w.r.t . @xmath23 , divided by the norm of @xmath127 . the normalization ( division by @xmath381 ) admits scale invariance to @xmath137 , and is of critical importance without it , rescaling @xmath127 would accordingly rescale the distance measure , rendering the latter uninformative in terms of deviation from separability . it is worthwhile noting the resemblance between @xmath137 and the concept of mutual information ( see @xcite for a comprehensive introduction ) . both measures quantify the interaction that a normalized function is the minimal @xmath0 distance between @xmath382 and a function separable w.r.t . accordingly , we may view @xmath137 as operating on normalized functions . ] induces between input variables , by measuring distance from separable functions . the difference between the measures is threefold . first , mutual information considers probability density functions ( non - negative and in @xmath383 ) , while @xmath137 applies to functions in @xmath0 . second , the notion of distance in mutual information is quantified through the kullback - leibler divergence , whereas in @xmath137 it is simply the @xmath0 metric . third , while mutual information evaluates the distance from a specific separable function product of marginal distributions , @xmath137 evaluates the minimal distance across all separable functions . we now turn to establish a spectral characterization of @xmath137 , which will be used in app . [ app : sep_rank_l2:ub_sep_rank ] and [ app : sep_rank_l2:lb_cac ] for deriving upper and lower bounds ( respectively ) . assume we have the following expression for @xmath127 : h(x_1, ,x_n)=_=1^m_=1^ma_,_(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) [ eq : orth_sep_decomp ] where @xmath384 and @xmath385 are positive integers , @xmath316 is an @xmath384-by-@xmath385 real matrix , and @xmath386 are orthonormal sets of functions in @xmath387 respectively . we refer to such expression as an _ orthonormal separable decomposition _ of @xmath127 , with @xmath316 being its _ coefficient matrix_. we will show that for any orthonormal separable decomposition , @xmath137 is given by the following formula : d(h;i , j)= [ eq : normalized_dist_formula ] where @xmath388 are the singular values of the coefficient matrix @xmath316 . this implies that if the largest singular value of @xmath316 accounts for a significant portion of the spectral energy , the normalized @xmath0 distance of @xmath127 from separable functions is small . on the other hand , if all but a fraction of the spectral energy is attributed to trailing singular values , @xmath127 is far from being separable ( @xmath137 is close to @xmath4 ) . as a first step in deriving eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_formula ] , we show that @xmath389 : h ^2 & & + & & ( _ = 1^m_=1^ma_,_(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_(x_j_1, ,x_j_))^2dx_1dx_n + & & _ , |=1^m_,|=1^ma_,a_|,|_(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) + & & _ |(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_|(x_j_1, ,x_j_)dx_1dx_n + & & _ , |=1^m_,|=1^ma_,a_|,|_(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) + & & _ |(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_|(x_j_1, ,x_j_)dx_1dx_n + & & _ , |=1^m_,|=1^ma_,a_|,|_(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_|(x_i_1, ,x_i_)dx_i_1dx_i _ + & & _(x_j_1, ,x_j_)_|(x_j_1, ,x_j_)dx_j_1dx_j _ + & & _ , |=1^m_,|=1^ma_,a_|,| \ { ll 1 & , =| + 0 & , } \ { ll 1 & , =| + 0 & , } + & & _ = 1^m_=1^ma_,^2 + & & _ 1 ^ 2(a)++_\{m , m}^2(a ) [ eq : orth_sep_decomp_norm ] equality @xmath390 here originates from the definition of @xmath0 norm . @xmath391 is obtained by plugging in the expression in eq . [ eq : orth_sep_decomp ] . @xmath392 is merely an arithmetic manipulation . @xmath393 follows from the linearity of integration . @xmath394 makes use of fubini s theorem ( see @xcite ) . @xmath395 results from the orthonormality of @xmath396 and @xmath397 . @xmath398 is a trivial computation . finally , @xmath399 is an outcome of the fact that the squared frobenius norm of a matrix , _ i.e. _ the sum of squares over its entries , is equal to the sum of squares over its singular values ( see @xcite for proof ) . let @xmath400 . by fact [ fact : orth_decomp ] in app . [ app : proofs : sep_mat_ranks_equal ] , there exist scalars @xmath401 , and a function @xmath402 orthogonal to @xmath403 , such that @xmath404 . similarly , for any @xmath405 there exist @xmath406 and @xmath407 such that @xmath408 . fact [ fact : prod ] in app . [ app : proofs : sep_mat_ranks_equal ] indicates that the function given by @xmath409 belongs to @xmath303 . we may express it as follows : g(x_i_1, ,x_i_)g(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) & = & _ = 1^m_=1^m___(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) + & & + ( _ = 1^m__(x_i_1, ,x_i_))(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) + & & + ( x_i_1, ,x_i_)(_=1^m__(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) ) + & & + ( x_i_1, ,x_i_)(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) according to fact [ fact : prod_orth ] in app . [ app : proofs : sep_mat_ranks_equal ] , the second , third and fourth terms on the right hand side of the above are orthogonal to @xmath410,\mu'\in[m']}$ ] . denote their summation by @xmath411 , and subtract the overall function from @xmath127 ( given by eq . [ eq : orth_sep_decomp ] ) : & & h(x_1, ,x_n)-g(x_i_1, ,x_i_)g(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) + & & = _ = 1^m_=1^ma_,_(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) + & & -_=1^m_=1^m___(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_(x_j_1, ,x_j_)-e(x_1, ,x_n ) + & & = _ = 1^m_=1^m(a_,-__)_(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_(x_j_1, ,x_j_)-e(x_1, ,x_n ) since the two terms in the latter expression are orthogonal to one another , we have : h(x_1, ,x_n)-g(x_i_1, ,x_i_)g(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) ^2 + = _ = 1^m_=1^m(a_,-__)_(x_i_1, ,x_i_)_(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) ^2+(x_1, ,x_n ) ^2 applying a sequence of steps as in eq . [ eq : orth_sep_decomp_norm ] to the first term in the second line of the above , we obtain : @xmath412 @xmath413 if @xmath267 and @xmath414 are the zero functions , implying that : @xmath415 with equality holding if @xmath416 and @xmath417 . now , @xmath418 is the squared frobenius distance between the matrix @xmath316 and the rank-@xmath4 matrix @xmath419 , where @xmath420 and @xmath421 are column vectors holding @xmath422 and @xmath423 respectively . this squared distance is greater than or equal to the sum of squares over the second to last singular values of @xmath316 , and moreover , the inequality holds with equality for proper choices of @xmath420 and @xmath421 ( @xcite ) . from this we conclude that : @xmath424 with equality holding if @xmath425 and @xmath426 are set to @xmath427 and @xmath428 ( respectively ) for proper choices of @xmath422 and @xmath423 . we thus have the infimum over all possible @xmath429 : _ h(x_1, ,x_n)-g(x_i_1, ,x_i_)g(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) ^2=_2 ^ 2(a)++_\{m , m}^2(a ) [ eq : unnormalized_dist_sq_formula ] recall that we would like to derive the formula in eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_formula ] for @xmath137 , assuming @xmath127 is given by the orthonormal separable decomposition in eq . [ eq : orth_sep_decomp ] . taking square root of the equalities established in eq . [ eq : orth_sep_decomp_norm ] and [ eq : unnormalized_dist_sq_formula ] , and plugging them into the definition of @xmath137 ( eq . [ eq : normalized_dist ] ) , we obtain the sought after result . we now relate @xmath137 the normalized @xmath0 distance of @xmath128 from the set of separable functions w.r.t . @xmath23 ( eq . [ eq : normalized_dist ] ) , to @xmath136 the separation rank of @xmath127 w.r.t . @xmath23 ( eq . [ eq : sep_rank ] ) . specifically , we make use of the formula in eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_formula ] to derive an upper bound on @xmath137 in terms of @xmath136 . assuming @xmath127 has finite separation rank ( otherwise the bound we derive is trivial ) , we may express it as : h(x_1, ,x_n)=_=1^rg_(x_i_1, ,x_i_)g_(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) [ eq : sep_decomp ] where @xmath234 is some positive integer ( necessarily greater than or equal to @xmath136 ) , and @xmath288 , @xmath289 . let @xmath430 and @xmath431 be two sets of orthonormal functions spanning @xmath432 and @xmath433 respectively . by definition , for every @xmath434 there exist @xmath435 and @xmath436 such that @xmath437 and @xmath438 . plugging this into eq . [ eq : sep_decomp ] , we obtain : @xmath439 this is an orthonormal separable decomposition of @xmath127 ( eq . [ eq : orth_sep_decomp ] ) , with coefficient matrix @xmath440 , where @xmath441^{\top}$ ] and @xmath442^{\top}$ ] for every @xmath434 . obviously the rank of @xmath316 is no greater than @xmath234 , implying : @xmath443 where as in app . [ app : sep_rank_l2:normalized_dist ] , @xmath388 stand for the singular values of @xmath316 . introducing this inequality into eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_formula ] gives : @xmath444 the latter holds for any @xmath445 that admits eq . [ eq : sep_decomp ] , so in particular we may take it to be minimal , _ i.e. _ to be equal to @xmath136 ( @xmath127 is identically zero ) . ] , bringing forth the sought after upper bound : d(h;i , j ) [ eq : normalized_dist_ub ] by eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_ub ] , low separation rank implies proximity ( in normalized @xmath0 sense ) to a separable function . we may use the inequality to translate the upper bounds on separation ranks established for deep and shallow convolutional arithmetic circuits ( sec . [ sec : analysis : deep ] and [ sec : analysis : shallow ] respectively ) , into upper bounds on normalized @xmath0 distances from separable functions . to completely frame our analysis in terms of the latter measure , a translation of the lower bound on separation ranks of deep convolutional arithmetic circuits ( sec . [ sec : analysis : deep ] ) is also required . eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_ub ] does not facilitate such translation , and in fact , it is easy to construct functions @xmath127 whose separation ranks are high yet are very close ( in normalized @xmath0 sense ) to separable functions . is given by an orthonormal separable decomposition ( eq . [ eq : orth_sep_decomp ] ) , with coefficient matrix @xmath316 that has high rank but whose spectral energy is highly concentrated on one singular value . ] however , as we show in app . [ app : sep_rank_l2:lb_cac ] below , the specific lower bound of interest can indeed be translated , and our analysis may entirely be framed in terms of normalized @xmath0 distance from separable functions . let @xmath287 be a function realized by a deep convolutional arithmetic circuit ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) with size-@xmath1 pooling windows and @xmath103 hidden layers ) , _ i.e. _ @xmath101 is given by eq . [ eq : h_y ] , where @xmath286 are linearly independent representation functions , and @xmath102 is a coefficient tensor of order @xmath6 and dimension @xmath62 in each mode , determined by the linear weights of the network ( @xmath446 ) through the hierarchical decomposition in eq . [ eq : hr_decomp ] . rearrange eq . [ eq : h_y ] by grouping indexes @xmath447 in accordance with the partition @xmath23 : h_y(x_1, ,x_n)= _ d_i_1 d_i_=1^m _ d_j_1 d_j_=1^m a_d_1 d_n^y(_t=1^ f__d_i_t(x_i_t ) ) ( _ t=1^ f__d_j_t(x_j_t ) ) [ eq : h_y_i_j ] let @xmath448 , and define the following mapping : @xmath449^{{\left\lverti \right\rvert}}\to[m]\quad,\quad \mu(d_{i_1},\ldots , d_{i_{{\left\lverti \right\rvert}}})=1+\sum\nolimits_{t=1}^{{\left\lverti \right\rvert}}(d_{i_t}-1){\cdot}m^{{\left\lverti \right\rvert}-t}\ ] ] @xmath450 is a one - to - one correspondence between the index sets @xmath451^{{\left\lverti \right\rvert}}$ ] and @xmath452 $ ] . we slightly abuse notation , and denote by @xmath453 the tuple in @xmath451^{{\left\lverti \right\rvert}}$ ] that maps to @xmath454 $ ] . additionally , we denote the function @xmath455 , which according to fact [ fact : prod ] in app . [ app : proofs : sep_mat_ranks_equal ] belongs to @xmath456 , by @xmath457 . in the exact same manner , we let @xmath458 , and define the bijective mapping : @xmath459^{{\left\lvertj \right\rvert}}\to[m']\quad,\quad \mu'(d_{j_1},\ldots , d_{j_{{\left\lvertj \right\rvert}}})=1+\sum\nolimits_{t=1}^{{\left\lvertj \right\rvert}}(d_{j_t}-1){\cdot}m^{{\left\lvertj \right\rvert}-t}\ ] ] as before , @xmath460 stands for the tuple in @xmath451^{{\left\lvertj \right\rvert}}$ ] that maps to @xmath461 $ ] , and the function @xmath462 is denoted by @xmath463 . now , recall the definition of matricization given in sec . [ sec : prelim ] , and consider @xmath119 the matricization of the coefficient tensor @xmath102 w.r.t . this is a matrix of size @xmath384-by-@xmath385 , holding @xmath34 in row index @xmath464 and column index @xmath465 . rewriting eq . [ eq : h_y_i_j ] with the indexes @xmath450 and @xmath466 instead of @xmath467 and @xmath468 , we obtain : h_y(x_1, ,x_n)= _ = 1^m _ =1^m ( ^y_i , j)_,_(x_i_1, ,x_i _ ) _(x_j_1, ,x_j _ ) [ eq : h_y_i_j_mat ] this equation has the form of eq . [ eq : orth_sep_decomp ] . however , for it to qualify as an orthonormal separable decomposition , the sets of functions @xmath430 and @xmath431 must be orthonormal . if the latter holds eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_formula ] may be applied , giving an expression for @xmath469 the normalized @xmath0 distance of @xmath101 from the set of separable functions w.r.t . @xmath23 , in terms of the singular values of @xmath119 . we now direct our attention to the special case where @xmath286 the network s representation functions , are known to be orthonormal . the general setting , in which only linear independence is known , will be treated thereafter . orthonormality of representation functions implies that @xmath470 are orthonormal as well : , _ | & & _ ( x_i_1, ,x_i_)_|(x_i_1, ,x_i_)dx_i_1dx_i _ + & & _ t=1^f__d_i_t()(x_i_t)_t=1^f__d_i_t(|)(x_i_t)dx_i_1dx_i _ + & & _ t=1^f__d_i_t()(x_i_t)f__d_i_t(|)(x_i_t)dx_i_t + & & _ t=1^,f__d_i_t(| ) + & & _ t=1^ \ { ll 1 & , d_i_t()=d_i_t(| ) + 0 & , } + & & \ { ll 1 & , d_i_t()=d_i_t(| ) + 0 & , . + & & \ { ll 1 & , =| + 0 & , . @xmath390 and @xmath393 here follow from the definition of inner product in @xmath0 space , @xmath391 replaces @xmath471 and @xmath472 by their definitions , @xmath392 makes use of fubini s theorem ( see @xcite ) , @xmath394 relies on the ( temporary ) assumption that representation functions are orthonormal , @xmath395 is a trivial step , and @xmath398 owes to the fact that @xmath473 is an injective mapping . a similar sequence of steps ( applied to @xmath474 ) shows that in addition to @xmath475 , the functions @xmath476 will also be orthonormal if @xmath477 are . we conclude that if representation functions are orthonormal , eq . [ eq : h_y_i_j_mat ] indeed provides an orthonormal separable decomposition of @xmath101 , and the formula in eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_formula ] may be applied : d(h_y;i , j)= [ eq : normalized_dist_formula_cac ] where @xmath478 are the singular values of the coefficient tensor matricization @xmath119 . in sec . [ sec : analysis : deep ] we showed that the maximal separation rank realizable by a deep network is greater than or equal to @xmath163 , where @xmath479 are the number of channels in the representation and first hidden layers ( respectively ) , and @xmath170 stands for the number of index quadruplets ( sets of the form @xmath480 for some @xmath481 $ ] ) that are split by the partition @xmath23 . to prove this lower bound , we presented in app . [ app : proofs : deep_mat_rank_bounds ] a specific setting for the linear weights of the network ( @xmath446 ) under which @xmath482 . careful examination of the proof shows that with this particular weight setting , not only is the rank of @xmath119 equal to @xmath163 , but also , all of its non - zero singular values are equal to one another.$ ] , @xmath350 has one of two forms : it is either a non - zero ( row / column ) vector , or it is a matrix holding @xmath4 in several entries and @xmath86 in all the rest , where any two entries holding @xmath4 reside in different rows and different columns . the first of the two forms admits a single non - zero singular value . the second brings forth several singular values equal to @xmath4 , possibly accompanied by null singular values . in both cases , all non - zero singular values of @xmath350 are equal to one another . now , since @xmath483 , and since the kronecker product multiplies singular values ( see @xcite ) , we have that all non - zero singular values of @xmath119 are equal , as required . ] this implies that @xmath484 , and since we currently assume that @xmath477 are orthonormal , eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_formula_cac ] applies and we obtain @xmath485 . maximizing over all possible weight settings , we arrive at the following lower bound for the normalized @xmath0 distance from separable functions brought forth by a deep convolutional arithmetic circuit : _ \{a^l,}_l , , a^l , yd(h_y|_\{a^l,}_l,,a^l , y ; i , j ) [ eq : normalized_dist_max_lb ] turning to the general case , we omit the assumption that representation functions @xmath286 are orthonormal , and merely rely on their linear independence . the latter implies that the dimension of @xmath486 is @xmath62 , thus there exist orthonormal functions @xmath487 that span it . let @xmath488 be a transition matrix between the bases the matrix defined by @xmath489}$ ] . suppose now that we replace the original representation functions @xmath477 by the orthonormal ones @xmath490 . using the latter , the lower bound in eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_max_lb ] applies , and there exists a setting for the linear weights of the network @xmath446 , such that @xmath491 . recalling the structure of convolutional arithmetic circuits ( fig . [ fig : nets_patterns](a ) ) , one readily sees that if we return to the original representation functions @xmath477 , while multiplying conv weights in hidden layer @xmath86 by @xmath492 ( _ i.e. _ mapping @xmath493 ) , the overall function @xmath101 remains unchanged , and in particular @xmath491 still holds . we conclude that the lower bound in eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_max_lb ] applies , even if representation functions are not orthonormal . to summarize , we translated the lower bound from sec . [ sec : analysis : deep ] on the maximal separation rank realized by a deep convolutional arithmetic circuit , into a lower bound on the maximal normalized @xmath0 distance from separable functions ( eq . [ eq : normalized_dist_max_lb ] ) . this , along with the translation of upper bounds facilitated in app . [ app : sep_rank_l2:ub_sep_rank ] , implies that the analysis carried out in the paper , which studies correlations modeled by convolutional networks through the notion of separation rank , may equivalently be framed in terms of normalized @xmath0 distance from separable functions . we note however that there is one particular aspect in our original analysis that does not carry through the translation . namely , in sec . [ sec : analysis : sep2mat ] it was shown that separation ranks realized by convolutional arithmetic circuits are maximal almost always , _ i.e. _ for all linear weight settings but a set of ( lebesgue ) measure zero . put differently , for a given partition @xmath23 , the maximal separation rank brought forth by a network characterizes almost all functions realized by it . an equivalent statement does not hold with the continuous measure of normalized @xmath0 distance from separable functions . the behavior of this measure across the hypotheses space of a network is non - trivial , and forms a subject for future research . in this appendix we provide implementation details omitted from the description of our experiments in sec . [ sec : exp ] . our implementation , available online at https://github.com/huji-deep/inductive-pooling , is based on the simnets branch ( ) of caffe toolbox ( @xcite ) . the latter realizes convolutional arithmetic circuits in log - space for numerical stability . when training convolutional arithmetic circuits , we followed the hyper - parameter choices made by . in particular , our objective function was the cross - entropy loss with no @xmath0 regularization ( _ i.e. _ with weight decay set to @xmath86 ) , optimized using adam ( @xcite ) with step - size @xmath494 and moment decay rates @xmath495 . @xmath496 iterations with batch size @xmath212 ( @xmath497 epochs ) were run , with the step - size @xmath110 decreasing by a factor of @xmath498 after @xmath499 iterations ( @xmath500 epochs ) . we did not use dropout ( @xcite ) , as the limiting factor in terms of accuracies was the difficulty of fitting training data ( as opposed to overfitting ) see fig . [ fig : exp_results_cac_pool4 ] . for training the conventional convolutional rectifier networks , we merely switched the hyper - parameters of adam to the recommended settings specified in @xcite ( @xmath501 ) , and set weight decay to the standard value of @xmath502 . the synthetic dataset used in our experiments ( sec . [ sec : exp ] ) consists of binary images displaying different shapes ( blobs ) . one of the tasks facilitated by this dataset is the detection of morphologically closed blobs , _ i.e. _ of images that are relatively similar to their morphological closure . the procedure we followed for computing the morphological closure of a binary image is : 1 . pad the given image with background ( @xmath86 value ) pixels 2 . morphological dilation : simultaneously turn on ( set to @xmath4 ) all pixels that have a ( left , right , top or bottom ) neighbor originally active ( holding @xmath4 ) 3 . morphological erosion : simultaneously turn off ( set to @xmath86 ) all pixels that have a ( left , right , top or bottom ) neighbor currently inactive ( holding @xmath86 ) 4 . remove pixels introduced in padding it is not difficult to see that any pixel active in the original image is necessarily active in its closure . moreover , pixels that are originally inactive yet are surrounded by active ones will also be turned on in the closure , hence the effect of `` gap filling '' . finally , we note that the particular sequence of steps described above represents the most basic form of morphological closure . the interested reader is referred to @xcite for a much more comprehensive introduction . Abstract:
[ "our formal understanding of the inductive bias that drives the success of convolutional networks on computer vision tasks is limited . in particular , it is unclear what makes hypotheses spaces born from convolution and pooling operations so suitable for natural images . in this paper we study the ability of convolutional networks to model correlations among regions of their input . we theoretically analyze convolutional arithmetic circuits , and empirically validate our findings on other types of convolutional networks as well . correlations are formalized through the notion of separation rank , which for a given partition of the input , measures how far a function is from being separable . we show that a polynomially sized deep network supports exponentially high separation ranks for certain input partitions , while being limited to polynomial separation ranks for others . the network s pooling geometry effectively determines which input partitions are favored , thus serves as a means for controlling the inductive bias . contiguous pooling windows as commonly employed in practice favor interleaved partitions over coarse ones , orienting the inductive bias towards the statistics of natural images . other pooling schemes lead to different preferences , and this allows tailoring the network to data that departs from the usual domain of natural imagery . in addition to analyzing deep networks , we show that shallow ones support only linear separation ranks , and by this gain insight into the benefit of functions brought forth by depth they are able to efficiently model strong correlation under favored partitions of the input ." ]
17,858
17,858
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the unprecedented development of laser technologies in recent two decades , mainly due to chirped pulse amplification technique @xcite , has allowed increase of intensity of laser sources in the first stage a six orders of magnitude @xcite reaching the relativistic intensities @xmath0@xmath1 in the infrared and optical domains , respectively , then exceeding these values up to @xmath2 for current superpower laser beams of ultrarelativistic intensities @xcite . in many laboratories @xcite compact lasers can deliver @xmath3 petawatt short pulses , with focused intensities as high as @xmath4 . next generation multipetawatt and exawatt optical laser systems @xcite will be capable to deliver ultrahigh intensities exceeding @xmath5 , which are well above the ultrarelativistic regime of electron - laser interaction . at such intensities the radiation - matter interaction enters the phase of ultrafast dynamics in supershort time scales , with formation of such important fields in condensed - matter - physics that the attoscience at1,at2,atto1,atto2,atto3,atto4 , and relativistic optics mourou , rel - rep2,br .- kr.,rel - rep1,pukh are . the appearance of laser sources with ultrarelativistic intensities has opened real possibilities for revelation of many nonlinear electrodynamic phenomena at the interaction of superpower radiation fields with high brightness accelerator beams @xcite , relativistic plasma targets of solid densities @xcite , and qed vacuum @xcite.laser sources of such enormous intensities predetermine , in particular , the future of laser accelerators @xcite of superperhigh energies , including laser - plasma accelerators @xcite . thus , currently available optical lasers provide @xmath6 up to @xmath7 , meanwhile with the next generation of laser systems one can manipulate with beams at @xmath8 @xmath9 . in such ultrastrong laser fields , electrons can reach to ultrarelativistic energies . however to obtain ultrarelativistic net energies for field - free electrons we need the third body for satisfaction of conservation laws for energy - momentum of a free electron ( after the interaction ) with absorption / radiation of photons in the field of a plane monochromatic wave @xcite , or take advantage of nonplane character of tightly focused supershort laser pulses @xcite . nevertheless , the actual way to get net energy exchange of relativistic electrons is using of coherent processes of laser - particle interaction with the additional resonances . among those the induced cherenkov , compton , and undulator processes are especially of interest @xcite . these are coherent induced processes where a critical intensity of stimulated wave exists ( because of coherent character of corresponding spontaneous process ) above which the induced process proceeds only in one direction - coherent radiation ( wave amplification ) , or absorption ( particle acceleration ) depending on the particle initial velocity with respect to resonance value ( satisfying the condition of coherency ) of each process . the latter is the most important feature of nonlinear resonance inherent in these processes to get high net energy change of particles , specifically for laser acceleration @xcite , or free electron laser ( fel ) @xcite , as well as to generate relativistic electron beams of low energy spreads and emittances due to the threshold nature of nonlinear resonance in these induced coherent processes . in principle , the realization of acceleration or inverse problem of fel in any laser - induced process requires the possible largest coherent length of particle - laser stimulated interaction at which the accumulation of particle energy in the acceleration regime , or coherent radiation -in the wave amplification regime take place on the whole coherent length of certain process . in other cases , the existence of an additional resonance ( e.g. , in a static magnetic field @xcite ) is necessary where the particle - wave interaction cross section enhances by many orders in magnitude . these are the linear resonances well enough investigated during the past decades . here we will consider laser - induced processes on free electrons with the large effective gain of interaction due to nonlinear resonance achieved in the given field of a strong laser radiation . in the induced cherenkov , compton , and undulator processes such resonance is adequate to fulfilment of condition of coherency between the particle and wave achieved in the field at the aforementioned critical intensity of the total wave - field . in the result of such interaction , at the laser intensities larger than critical value a nonlinear threshold phenomenon of particles reflection or capture take place -accelerating or decelerating electrons on the shortest interaction lengths , even shorter than a laser wavelength @xcite . in contrast to induced cherenkov process @xcite where the intensities of applied laser fields are confined by ionization threshold of dielectric media @xcite in vacuum processes in the induced compton @xcite and undulator @xcite ones there is no restriction on the electromagnetic ( em ) field strengths that allows to apply current superpower laser beams of ultrarelativistic intensities mourou for acceleration of particles up to superhigh energies . the other practical difference between these induced processes is in the relativistic character of initial resonance width of particles to reach the threshold value of corresponding nonlinear resonance in the field for reflection / capture phenomenon . thus , in contrast to cherenkov and undulator processes where practically initial relativistic / ultrarelativistic particles are needed for realization of nonlinear cherenkov resonance in gaseous media @xcite , or nonlinear resonance in a magnetic undulator with the step of the order of a few @xmath10 @xcite , induced compton mechanism for particles reflection / capture and , consequently , acceleration regime practically may be realized for arbitrary initial energies of the particles @xcite . in particular , using laser pulses of near frequencies one can accelerate initially nonrelativistic beams , or even particles in rest . second , at the same frequencies of counterpropagating laser pulses in the induced compton process one can achieve the cancellation of particles transverse momenta acquired in the field to obtain quasi - colinear particles bunches from the emerging relativistic electron targets ( elimination of a bunch angular divergence ) , as it has been proposed in the paper @xcite for generation of uniform relativistic electron layers at the coherent compton backscattering on the ultra - thin solid foils ( see , also , @xcite ) . a promising way for achieving of laser - driven electron acceleration is the use of a plasma medium @xcite . however , the laser - plasma accelerator schemes face problems connected with the inherent instabilities in laser - plasma interaction processes . on the other hand , the spectrum of direct acceleration mechanisms of charged particles by a single laser pulse is very restricted , since one should use the laser beams focused to subwavelength waist radii , or use subcycle laser pulses , or use radially polarized lasers , violating the plane character of a coherent laser pulse for particles acceleration by a single wave - pulse in vacuum without the third body . all these scenarios with different field configurations have been investigated both theoretically and experimentally in the works 22_exp , a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,a6,a7,a8,a9,a10,a11,a12,a13,a14,a15,a16,a17 . note that beside the focusing of a laser pulse to subwavelength waist radii we can get nonplane laser beam by terminating the field , either by reflection , absorption , or diffraction @xcite . the proof of principle experiment of this type has been reported in ref . @xcite . here it is used initially relativistic electron beam and a moderately strong laser pulse . to obtain dense enough electron bunches it is reasonable to consider electrons acceleration from nanoscale - solid plasma - targets meyer - ter - vehn , mirror1,mirror2,mirror3 at intensities high enough to separate all electrons from ions @xcite . thus , combining these two schemes one can obtain ultrarelativistic solid density electron bunches 11b,12b,13b,14b,15b,16b,17b,18b . such bunches can be used to obtain high - flux of positrons , @xmath11-quanta @xcite with possible applications in material science , medicine , and nuclear physics . the recent achievements in the laser technology related to implementation of supershort femtosecond laser sources and subsycle pulses of relativistic intensities exceeding the intra - atomic fields open real opportunities for realization of laser - plasma accelerators of ultrahigh energies mey .- ter,1p,2p,3p,4p,5p,6p,7p,8p . these schemes are based on the laser - plasma - wake - field and laser - beat - wave mechanisms of laser - assisted acceleration in plasma . the interaction of such powerful radiation fields with the plasma has led to generation of quasi - monoenergetic relativistic electron beams in laser - driven plasma accelerators a9,a10,a11,a12,a13,a14,a15,a16,a17 . concerning the interaction of ultrashort laser pulses of relativistic intensities with the free electrons in vacuum , i.e. the implementation of laser accelerators , one should note that experiments in this area are gathering power at present . one of the first laser accelerator concepts is the inverse cherenkov accelerator ( ica ) . the ica scheme has been investigated since the advent of lasers [ see , for example , @xcite ] . the appearance of powerful laser sources already in the next decade after the first lasers has stimulated comprehensive theoretical @xcite and experimental p1,p2,p3,p4,p5,kim1,kim2,kim3,kim4 investigations towards the implementation of both induced cherenkov problems ica and cherenkov laser realization in diverse schemes of multiphoton interaction that makes a phase velocity matching of em wave with a particle by controlling the refraction index of gaseous medium so as to be a wave phase velocity in a dielectric medium less than light speed in vacuum . various interaction schemes of electrons with stimulating radiation have been considered as with ultrarelativistic electron beams in a gaseous medium for the optical region @xcite , as well as with mildly relativistic beams in dielectric waveguides for the microwave region w1,w2,w3,w4,w5,w6,w7,w8,w9,unmag . in the latter case , the electron beam passes over the dielectric in the vacuum surface cherenkov process that enables one to avoid the impeding factors of the medium ( the multiple scattering of electrons on atoms , the ionization losses in the medium etc . ) . besides , the usage of solid - state dielectric as a slow - wave structure ( with rather high dielectric constant @xmath12 , @xmath13 ) enables the achievement of electron - wave synchronism by mildly or moderately relativistic electron beams . it is important to note that the effect of critical field exists even in a very week wave field if the interaction occurs in the region close to the initial cherenkov resonance . therefore one can not escape these peculiarities restricting only the intensity of the external wave field and solve the problem in the scope of the linear theory even for very week wave fields @xcite . note that regarding the induced cherenkov process a series of systematical wrong works have been made during the last two decades of past century , which were discussed in special review @xcite devoted to consideration of those results . in the mentioned review the all principal mistakes have been shown in detail , therefore in the current review article we will not repeat the analysis of those papers which reader can get in the review @xcite . the particle reflection phenomenon from a slowed plane wave pulse has been applied also for cases where the group velocity of a wave pulse due to the dispersion can be less than light speed in vacuum @xcite : in ref . @xcite for the case of a plasma , in ref . @xcite at the focusing of an ultrashort laser pulse in vacuum , in the so - called by authors dispersion - dominated propagation regime . nonlinear resonance of threshold nature requiring shortest acceleration length also takes place at the charged particle interaction with strong laser radiation _ _ _ _ and static magnetic field along the wave propagation direction _ _ _ _ ( when the resonant effect of the wave on the particle rotational motion in the uniform magnetic field is possible ) in a medium @xcite . in vacuum , as a result of the interaction of a charged particle with a monochromatic em wave and uniform magnetic field the resonance created at the initial moment for the free - particle velocity automatically holds throughout the whole interaction process due to the equal doppler shifts of the larmor and wave frequencies in the field . this phenomenon is known as autoresonance @xcite . _ _ _ _ this property of cyclotron resonance in vacuum makes possible as particles acceleration @xcite , as well as the creation of a generator of coherent microwave radiation / radioemission by an electron beam , namely , a cyclotron resonance maser ( crm ) ginz1,ginz2,mcn , coo , nus , ai1,ai2,brat . from the point of view of quantum theory the relativistic nonequidistant landau levels of the particle in the wave field become equidistant in the autoresonance with the quantum recoil at the absorption / emission of photons by the particle . _ _ _ _ in addition , the dynamic stark effect of the wave electric field on the transversal bound states of the particle does not violate the equidistance of landau levels in the autoresonance . _ _ then the inverse process , that is , multiphoton resonant excitation of landau levels by strong em wave and , consequently , the particle acceleration in vacuum due to cyclotron resonance , in principle , is possible . _ _ in a medium with arbitrary refraction properties ( dielectric or plasma ) because of the different doppler shifts of the larmor and wave frequencies in the interaction process the autoresonance is violated . however , the threshold ( by the wave intensity ) phenomenon of electron hysteresis in a medium due to the nonlinear cyclotron resonance in the field of strong monochromatic em wave takes place @xcite ( this process has been treated in the earlier paper @xcite , where , however , only an oscillating solution has been obtained ) . _ _ _ in contrast to autoresonance , the nonlinear cyclotron resonance in a medium proceeds with a large enough resonant width . _ _ _ this so - called phenomenon of electron hysteresis leads to significant acceleration of particles , especially in the plasmalike media where the superstrong laser fields of ultrarelativistic intensities can be applied @xcite . note that the use of dielectriclike ( gaseous ) media in this process makes it possible to realize cyclotron resonance in the optical domain ( with laser radiation ) due to the possibility of arbitrarily small doppler shift of a wave frequency close to the cherenkov cone , in contrast to the vacuum case where the cyclotron resonance for the existing maximal powerful static magnetic fields is possible only in the microwave domain @xcite . the particle reflection phenomenon has a significant property : at the above - threshold interaction the induced process occurs only in one direction either direct ( laser scheme ) or inverse ( accelerator scheme ) @xcite meanwhile at the below - threshold interaction the both direct and inverse processes take place simultaneously that reduces in general the net gain for each problem . therefore this phenomenon gives in principal new opportunity for implementation of nonlinear schemes of fel or laser accelerators in the induced coherent processes at the above - threshold interaction regime . due to this feature the reflection phenomenon may also be used for the monochromatization of particle beams @xcite . on the other hand , because of reflection phenomenon the nonlinear compton effect in media with @xmath14 can proceed only at the wave@xmath15intensities below the critical one @xcite . for the nonplane em wave pulses of small space sizes ( tightly focused ) and of short duration , such as current superpower laser pulses are , it is impossible to solve the problem analytically . hence , in the papers last , wigler,2_beams the reflectionand capture phenomena in case of actual nonplane - short laser pulses has been investigated by numerical integration of relativistic equations of motion . the phenomenon of particle reflectionand capture by em wave being of pure classical nature , nevertheless leads to quantum effects of probability density modulation of a free particle state on the hard x - ray frequencies because of interference of incident and reflected ( inelastic ) de broglie waves after the reflection from a wave barrier @xcite and of zone structure of particle states in the wave potential well capture regime like the particle states in a crystal lattice @xcite . on the other hand , it is evident that the role of particle spin in this process _ _ _ _ is important since in dielectriclike media the wave periodic em field in the intrinsic frame of reference becomes a static magnetic field and spin interaction _ _ _ _ with such a field should resemble the zeeman effect . besides , the critical intensity depends on the particle spin projection and , consequently , it is differ for different initial spin orientations . choosing the certain value for critical intensity corresponding to the certain spin orientation of particles in the beam , with the appropriate laser intensity ( above this critical value ) one can achieve the particle beam polarization.these are the quantum effects in the above critical regime of induced cherenkov process . below the critical intensity the coherent effects of particles classical bunching on optical and shorter wavelengths @xcite , quantum effects of modulation of particle probability density on the wave harmonics mod , mod.2,mod.3 , and inelastic diffraction scattering of the particles on the traveling em wave in a dielectric medium takes place dif.2,dif.3,dif.4 like the kapitza dirac effect on a standing wave lattice @xcite or bragg diffraction on a crystal lattice @xcite . the interest to kapitza dirac effect @xcite has been increased especially after the successful realization of experiment with high - intensity and strongly coherent laser beams - gratings @xcite . it follows to note that observation of diffraction effect during the next 70 years after its prediction had not been succeeded . for the acquaintance with the experimental situation in this area since the advent of this effect , or for detailed references on earlier work we refer the reader to review papers @xcite . the significance of kapitza dirac effect , apart from its quantum - mechanical meaning as a best example of demonstration of electron matter wave diffracted by light and , moreover , as an unique sample of a diffraction system with reversed properties of the matter and light , is also conditioned by important applications , since electron beams difracted from highly coherent laser gratings are coherent with each other . hence , the kapitza dirac effect is a very convenient , even maybe an irreplaceable means to realize coherent electron beams . such beams can serve as a basis for construction of new important tools of diverse species , e.g. , coherent beam splitters , new type electron interferometers which would operate at rather low electron energies ( typical for existing now in atomic physics ) etc . kapitza dirac effect on standing wave lattice is a particular case of the induced compton process in the field of two counterpropagating em waves of the same frequencies at which electron moves in perpendicular direction to wavevectors of counterpropagating waves ( classical condition of resonance ) , to exclude the doppler shifting of waves frequencies because of longitudinal component of electron velocity . at the quantum condition of resonance -taking into account the quantum recoil as well- the exact condition of resonance is satisfied at the small angle to perpendicular direction that corresponds to elastic bragg diffraction on the phase lattice of a standing wave . nevertheless , the phase matching between the electrons and counterpropagating waves in the induced compton process can also be fulfilled in general case of bichromatic em waves of different frequencies if electron moves at the certain angle with respect to wavevectors of counterpropagating waves at which the condition of coherency between the electron and waves of different frequencies is satisfied dif.2 . however , in contrast to kapitza dirac effect , diffraction of electrons in this case is inelastic . thus , due to the induced compton effect in the two wave fields an electron absorbs @xmath16 photons from the one wave and coherently radiates @xmath16 photons into the other wave of different frequency and vice versa . this is the condition of coherency in the induced compton process corresponding to the resonance between the doppler - shifted frequencies in the intrinsic frame of reference of an electron in the bichromatic counterpropagating waves at which the conservation of the number of photons in the induced compton process takes place fed.,dif.2,fed.mci ( see , also the paper @xcite where theoretical analysis of the scattering of electrons by a strong standing wave with a slowly varying amplitude has been made ) , in contrast to spontaneous compton effect in the strong wave field where after the multiphoton absorption a single photon is emitted @xcite so , the scope of the kapitza dirac effect has been extended since 1975 in the works @xcite for inelastic diffraction scattering of electrons on strong travelling wave in the induced compton , cherenkov , and undulator / wiggler processes , taking into account the the mentioned peculiarity in these processes . note that the term `` strong wave '' here is relative , since the mentioned nonlinear resonance takes place even in the very weak wave - fields if the electrons initially are close to the resonance state , i.e. the electrons initial longitudinal velocity is close to the phase velocity of the slowed wave , at which the critical field is also very small and , respectively , very low wave intensities may be above critical @xcite . at this background , the paper @xcite is completely misunderstanding where authors , citing the papers @xcite but bypassing the existence of critical field with aforementioned peculiarity , they obtain the same formula of the paper @xcite for multiphoton probability of diffraction scattering on the travelling wave in a dielectric medium ( by other way -on the base of the helmholtz kirchhoff diffraction theory- following to papers @xcite ) , and after four decades claim about the possibility of diffraction effect of electrons on the travelling wave in a dielectric medium . the organization of the paper is as follows . in sec . ii the exact nonlinear theory of induced cherenkov process in the strong laser fields is presented . the peculiarity inherent to nonlinear resonance in coherent processes of threshold character and existence of critical intensity leading to particle reflection and capture phenomenon is described in subsec . ii 1 . in subsec . laser acceleration of charged particles in gaseous media cherenkov accelerator with the variable refraction index of a gaseous medium is considered . in subsec . the nonlinear cyclotron resonance of threshold nature in a medium electron hysteresis phenomenon is presented . in subsec . ii 4 . the theory of coherent radiation of charged particle beams in capture regime cherenkov amplifier is presented . in sec . the quantum theory of nonlinear induced cherenkov process is considered . in subsec . the spin - effects at the electron reflection phenomenon and the possibility to achieve the polarized particle beams is considered . in subsec . quantum coherent effect of electrons reflection from the traveling - wave - phase - lattice in the exact resonance is investigated . in subsec . the quantum regime of spinor particles capture by slowed traveling wave at the exact bragg resonance is considered . in subsec . the quantum modulation effect of particle state on the optical harmonics at the pump wave intensities below the critical value is presented . in sec . iv the vacuum versions of induced coherent processes induced compton and undulator / wiggler processes are investigated revealing the particle reflection nonlinear threshold phenomena in vacuum , as well as inelastic diffraction effect of electrons like to kapitza dirac effect in vacuum are considered . in subsec . induced compton process in the field of two bichromatic counterpropagating waves is investigated . in subsec . the reflection phenomenon in the undulator / wiggler is considered . in subsec . iv 3 . the general theory of inelastic diffraction effect of electrons on the slowing travelling wave is presented . in subsec . diffraction regime of electron coherent scattering on the traveling wave phase - lattice is considered . in subsec . the bragg regime of exact resonance on travelling wave lattice is presented . finally , conclusions are given in sec . v. relativistic classical equations of motion for a charged particle energy in the field of a plane em wave give the exact solution @xcite : @xmath17 @xmath18\biggr]^{1/2}\biggr\ } \label{1}\ ] ] where @xmath19 is the refraction index of a medium ( @xmath20 and @xmath21 are the dielectric and magnetic permittivities of the medium , respectively ) , @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 are respectively particle mass , initial energy , momentum and velocity -directed at the angle @xmath25 to the wave propagation direction @xmath26 ( @xmath27 ) , @xmath28 is the light speed in vacuum , and @xmath29 denotes the dimensionless relativistic invariant intensity parameter of the wave : @xmath30 with the vector potential @xmath31 ; @xmath32 is the retarding wave coordinate of the plane em wave in a medium , and @xmath33 , @xmath34 slowly varying amplitudes of the vector potential and electric field of a quasimonochromatic wave amplitudes ( the wave is linearly polarized along the axis @xmath35 : @xmath36 ) . hereafter we will assume that the wave frequency @xmath37 is far from the main resonance transitions between the atomic levels of the medium to prohibit the wave absorption and nonlinear optical effects in the medium and consequently @xmath38 will correspond to the linear refraction index of the medium . as is seen from eq . ( [ 1 ] ) the expression determining the particle energy in the wave field is , first , not single - valued and , second , may become imaginary depending on particle and wave parameters . the peculiarity arising in the induced cherenkov process because of particle strong wave nonlinear interaction is connected with this fact . hence , treatment of the particle dynamics in this process should start by clarification of these questions . to consider the behavior of a particle upon nonlinear interaction with a strong wave in a medium on the basis of eq . ( [ 1 ] ) we will analyze the case where the initial velocity of the particle at @xmath39 ( @xmath40 ) is directed along the wave propagation direction for which the picture of the particle nonlinear dynamics is physically more evident . in this case ( [ 1 ] ) becomes : @xmath41 , \label{5}\]]@xmath42 as is seen , eq . ( [ 5 ] ) is twovalence and , at first , we shall provide the unique definition of the particle energy in accordance with the initial condition . in the case of plasma ( @xmath43 ) or vacuum ( @xmath44 ) the term under the root is always positive , hence , in these cases one has to take before the root only the upper sign ( @xmath45 ) to satisfy the initial condition @xmath46 when @xmath47 . in the case @xmath44 , eq . ( [ 5 ] ) yields known vacuum result . further investigation is devoted to the case of a medium with refraction index @xmath48 . in this case the nature of the particle motion essentially depends on the initial conditions and the value of the parameter @xmath29 as far as the expression under the root in eq . ( [ 5 ] ) may become negative . to solve this problem one needs to pass the complex plane were eq . ( [ 5 ] ) has the form of known inverse jukowski function . if @xmath49 ( @xmath50 is the maximum value of the parameter @xmath51 ) the expression under the root in eq . ( [ 5 ] ) is always positive and in front of the root one has to take the upper sign ( @xmath45 ) according to the initial condition . then @xmath52 after the interaction ( @xmath53 ) and the particle energy remains unchanged . if @xmath54 the particle is unable to penetrate into the wave , i.e. , into the region @xmath55 since at @xmath55 the root in eq . ( [ 5 ] ) becomes a complex one . this complexity now is bypassed via continuously passing from one riemann sheet to another , which corresponds to changing the inverse jukowski function from @xmath45 to @xmath56 before the root . hence , the upper sign ( @xmath45 ) in this case stands up to the value of the wave intensity @xmath57 , then at @xmath58 the root changes its sign from @xmath45 to @xmath56 , providing continuous value for the particle energy in the field . the intensity value @xmath59 of the wave is a turn point for the particle motion , so that we call it the critical value . thus , when the maximum value of the wave intensity exceeds the critical value a transverse plane em wave in the medium becomes a potential barrier and the reflection of the particle from the wave envelope ( @xmath51 ) takes place . if now @xmath60 , we obtain after the reflection for the particle energy @xmath61 . \label{7}\ ] ] if the initial conditions are such that the wave pulse overtakes the particle ( @xmath62 ) , then after the reflection @xmath63 and the particle is accelerated . but if the particle overtakes the wave ( @xmath64 ) , then @xmath65 and particle deceleration takes place . this threshold phenomenon of the particle reflection can be more clearly presented in the frame of reference connected with the wave . in this frame the electric field of the wave vanishes ( @xmath66 ) and there is only the static magnetic field ( @xmath67 ) . the phenomenon of charged particle reflection from a plane em wave may also be used for the monochromatization of particle beams . the fact that above the critical intensity value the induced cherenkov process occurs in only one direction either emission or absorption and for the initial cherenkov velocity @xmath68 the energy of the particle after the reflection does not change , in principle enables conversion of the energetic or angular spreads of charged particle beams . in this case the energy of the particle is given by eq . ( [ 1 ] ) , which at the actual values of the parameters for induced cherenkov process the second term under the root is much smaller than the third one , that is , @xmath69 and for the critical field in this case ( at the wave linear polarization - electric field strength along the axis @xmath35 ) we have @xmath70(in the case @xmath71 , @xmath72 is determined by eq . ( [ 6 ] ) ) . if the maximal value of the wave intensity @xmath73 , then the particle energy after the reflection is @xmath74 . \label{10}\ ] ] let the charged particle beam with an initial energetic ( @xmath75 ) and angular ( @xmath76 ) spread interact with a plane transverse em wave of intensity @xmath73 in a gaseous medium . to keep the mean energy @xmath77 of the beam unchanged after the interaction ( at the adiabatic turning on and turning off of the wave ) the axis of the beam with mean velocity @xmath78 must be pointed at the cherenkov angle ( @xmath79 ) to the laser beam , i.e. , @xmath80 . under this condition the particles with velocities @xmath81 will acquire an energy and the other particles for which the longitudinal velocities exceed the phase velocity of the wave ( @xmath82 ) will loss an energy according to eq . ( [ 10 ] ) . as a result the energies of the particles @xmath83 will approach close to the mean energy @xmath77 of the beam ( @xmath84 @xmath85 ) and the final energetic width of the beam will become less than the initial one . as there is one free parameter ( for a specified velocity @xmath86 the parameters @xmath79 and @xmath87 are related by cherenkov condition ) it is possible to use it to control the exchange in the energy of the particles after the reflection ( [ 10 ] ) and to reach the minimal final energy spread of the beam @xmath88 monochromatization . depending on the relation between the initial energetic and angular spreads and mean energy of the beam , the opposite process may occur , namely angular narrowing of the beam . physically it is clear that with the monochromatization the angular divergence of the beam will increase and the opposite the angular narrowing of the beam leads to demonochromatization ( in accordance with liouville s theorem ) . more detailed consideration of this effect with the quantitative results can be found in the papers @xcite ( for suppression of a beam spread by vacuum versions of reflection phenomenon see the papers @xcite ) . to illustrate the typical picture of nonlinear interaction of a charged particle with a strong em wave in a medium we present the graphics of numerical solutions for the laser pulse of finite duration , showing the behavior of particle dynamics below and above critical intensity , with the effect of acceleration . at first we will not take into account the dependence of the slowly varying intensity envelope of a laser beam from the transversal coordinates . thus , a laser beam may be modeled as @xmath89where @xmath90 characterizes the pulse duration . is plotted when the wave intensity is above the critical point . ] the particle initial energy is taken to be @xmath91 @xmath92 and the initial velocity is directed at the angle @xmath93 @xmath94 to the wave propagation direction ( @xmath95 ) . the refraction index of the gaseous medium for this calculation has been chosen to be @xmath96 . figure 1 illustrates the evolution of the particle energy : the energy versus the position @xmath97 is plotted for a neodymium laser ( @xmath98 @xmath99 ) with electric field strength @xmath100 @xmath101 and @xmath102 ( @xmath103 is the wave period ) . for these parameter values the wave intensity is above the critical point and , as we see from this figure , the particle energy is abruptly changed corresponding to the reflectionphenomenon . figure 2a illustrates the evolution of the energies of particles with different initial interaction angles . the initial energies for all particles are @xmath104 @xmath105 . figure 2b illustrates the role of initial conditions : the final energy versus the interaction angle is plotted . as follows from eq . ( [ 9 ] ) the critical intensity , as well as the final energy ( [ 10 ] ) , depend on the initial interaction angle and as a consequence we have this picture . note that the acceleration rate neither depends on the field magnitude ( only should be above threshold field ) nor on the interaction length . , ( b ) @xmath106 , and ( c ) @xmath107 . ] to demonstrate the dependence of the considered process on transversal profile of the laser intensity for actual beams in fig . 3 the evolution of the energies of particles with various initial phases ( with initial energies @xmath104 @xmath105 ) is illustrated . the laser beam transversal profile is modeled by the gaussian function @xmath108with @xmath109 @xmath110 . as we see from this figure the acceleration picture is essentially changed depending on the entrance coordinates of the particles . this is the manifestation of the threshold nature of the reflection phenomenon . if for the intensity exceeding the critical value a plane em wave becomes a potential barrier for the external particle ( with respect to the wave ) , then for the particle initially situated in the wave it may become a potential well and particle capture by the wave will take place @xcite . the phenomenon of charged particle reflection and capture by a transverse em wave can be used for particle acceleration in laser fields . as the application of large intensities in this process is restricted because of the medium ionization the acceleration owing to reflection in the medium with refraction index @xmath111 single reflection is relatively small . however , if the refraction index decreases along the wave propagation direction in such a way that the condition of particle synchronous motion with the wave @xmath112 takes place continuously , the phase velocity of the wave will increase all the time and the particle being in front of the wave barrier ( at @xmath55 ) will continuously be reflected , i.e. , continuously accelerated . the law @xmath113 must have an adiabatic character not to allow the particle to leave the wave after the single reflection . such variation law of the refraction index can be realized in a gaseous medium adiabatically decreasing the pressure . for particle acceleration one can also use the capture regime . in this case in the medium with @xmath111 the particle energy does not change on average ( particle makes stable oscillations around the equilibrium phases in the wave moving with average velocity @xmath114 ) . if one decreases the refraction index along the propagation direction of the wave , so that the particle does not leave the equilibrium phases , then the wave will continuously accelerate the particle . then , to realize the capture regime one needs @xmath115 . for not very strong fields this is sufficiently strict confinement on the transverse momentum of the particle . for particle acceleration by laser fields one can use the capture regime corresponding to large transverse momenta of the particle @xmath116 so , we will consider the general case of particle capture with arbitrary initial momentum @xmath117 and laser acceleration in gaseous medium with varying refraction index @xmath118 . the variation law of the medium refraction index for acceleration is determined by equation : @xmath119 . \label{62}\ ] ] it is seen from this equation that for the particle acceleration in the capture regime via decreasing refraction index of the medium ( @xmath120 ) one needs @xmath121 ( equilibrium transverse momentum of the particle must be directed along the vector of the wave electric field ) . in the opposite case the continuous deceleration of the particle will take place accompanied by induced cherenkov radiation ( regime of continuous amplification of the wave by the particle beam at @xmath122 ) . the energy of equilibrium particle acquired on the distance @xmath97 is defined by @xmath123 equation ( [ 63 ] ) in the general case defines the particle acceleration in the capture regime when the medium refraction index falls along the wave propagation . it defines the longitudinal dimension of such cherenkov accelerator as well . the transverse dimension of the latter is defined by @xmath124 here @xmath125 and @xmath126 are the initial equilibrium values of the energy and transverse coordinate of the particle ( @xmath127 is the transverse dimension of cherenkov accelerator ) . as is seen from eq . ( [ 65 ] ) the particle acceleration takes place if @xmath128 , and in the opposite case deceleration occurs ( @xmath129 ) in accordance with what was mentioned above . for relativistic particles , when @xmath130 and @xmath131 , from eq . ( [ 62 ] ) we have @xmath132 for energy of the equilibrium particle at large acceleration we have @xmath133 the estimations show that , for example , at electric field strengths of laser radiation @xmath134 @xmath101 an electron with initial energy @xmath135 @xmath105 acquires energy @xmath136 @xmath105 already at the distance @xmath137 @xmath138 . the transverse dimension of acceleration @xmath139is of the order of a few millimeters and the longitudinal dimension of the system is of the order of the transverse one ( a few times larger ) . at the distance @xmath137 @xmath140 the particle energy gain is of the order of @xmath141 @xmath142 . note that because of multiple scattering on the atoms of the medium the particles can leave the regime of stable motion as a result of change of @xmath143 . the analysis shows that the multiple scattering essentially falls in the above - mentioned gaseous media for laser field strengths @xmath144 @xmath145 . to illustrate the particle acceleration in the capture regime we will represent the results of numerical solution of relativistic equations of motion in the field of an actual laser beam with the electric field strength @xmath146@xmath147where @xmath90 characterizes the pulse duration and @xmath148 is the initial phase . simulations have been made for neodymium laser ( @xmath149 @xmath99 ) with electric field strength @xmath100 @xmath101 and @xmath150 @xmath151 . the variation law for the refraction index of the medium is defined in self - consistent manner that may be approximated by the function @xmath152where @xmath153 , @xmath154 are the initial and final values of the refraction index and @xmath155 characterizes the decreasing rate . . in ( b ) the final energy versus the initial phase is plotted . ] @xmath156 . in ( b ) the final energy versus the initial phase is plotted . ] figure 4 illustrates the evolution of the particle energy in the capture regime . the particle initial energy is taken to be @xmath157 @xmath158 and the initial velocity is directed at the angle @xmath159 @xmath94 to the wave propagation direction ( @xmath160 ) . the initial value of the refraction index has been chosen to be @xmath161 . as we see in the capture regime with variable refraction index , one can achieve considerable acceleration . to show the role of initial conditions in fig . 5a the evolution of the energies of particles with the same initial energies @xmath157 @xmath158 ( @xmath162 @xmath94 ) and various initial phases is illustrated . the initial entrance coordinate is @xmath163 . figure 5b displays the role of initial conditions : the final energy versus the initial phase is plotted . in fig . 6 the parameters are the same as in fig . 5a except the initial entrance coordinate , which is taken to be @xmath164 @xmath156 . as we see from these figures the captured particles are accelerated , while the particles situated in the unstable phases ( or if the conditions for capture are not fulfilled ) after the interaction remain with the initial energy . consider now the dynamics of a charged particle in the field of a strong em wave in a medium at the presence of a static uniform magnetic field @xmath165 along the wave propagation direction nonlinear cyclotron resonance in a medium . in this case the problem can be solved analytically only for the circular polarization of monochromatic wave and if the initial velocity of the particle is directed along the axis of the wave propagation . as far as the equation for the particle longitudinal momentum is not changed in the presence of a uniform magnetic field with respect to equation in the field of a plane em wave in a medium , and the equation for the particle energy change in the field remains unchanged , then one can represent the particle longitudinal velocity @xmath166 and energy @xmath167 ^{1/2}\right\ } \label{4.54}\]]via the transversal momentum @xmath168 in the field . here the parameter @xmath169 is @xmath170note that @xmath171 is the critical value of the wave intensity ( [ 6 ] ) ( at @xmath48 ) for the particle reflectionphenomenon in the absence of a static magnetic field ( @xmath172 ) . the sign @xmath45under the root in ( [ 4.54 ] ) corresponds to the case of the interaction in dielectriclike media with @xmath48 and the sign @xmath56 , plasmalike media with @xmath43 . note that in contrast to the case @xmath172 ( induced cherenkov process ) in eq . ( [ 4.54 ] ) before the root , only the sign @xmath45 is taken ( in accordance with the initial conditions @xmath173 and @xmath174 of the free particle ) since , as will be shown below , in this case the expression under the root is always positive and consequently the root can not change its sign . now the considered problem reduces to definition of the particle transversal momentum @xmath175 which in the wave coordinate @xmath176 @xmath177 obey the following equation : @xmath178 ^{1/2}}z\left ( \tau \right ) , \label{4.57}\ ] ] where the complex quantity @xmath179 related to the dimensionless parameter of the particle transversal momentum@xmath180@xmath181 and @xmath182 is the larmor frequency for the initial velocity of the particle . for an arbitrary plane em wave eq . ( [ 4.57 ] ) is a nonlinear equation the exact solution of which can not be found . however , for the monochromatic wave of circular polarization when @xmath183 one can find the exact solution of eq . ( [ 4.57 ] ) . the latter is sought in the form @xmath184 and for the transversal momentum of the particle we obtain the following algebraic equation : @xmath185where the quantities @xmath186 , @xmath187 are expressed in the scale of the parameter @xmath171 : @xmath188 we will not represent here the exact solution of eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) for @xmath189 . an interesting nonlinear phenomenon exists in this process @xcite which can be found out through the graphical solution of eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) . thus , depending on the ratio of the larmor and wave frequencies as well as on the initial velocity of the particle ( in the case of dielectriclike medium where @xmath190 ) the solution of eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) is a single - valued or multivalent that essentially changes the interaction behavior of the particle with a strong em wave at the nonlinear cyclotron resonance in a medium . hence , we will consider separately the cases @xmath191 and @xmath192 at@xmath193 where @xmath194is the doppler - shifted frequency of the wave for the initial velocity of the particle . if @xmath64 the effects considered here will take place with the opposite circular polarization of the wave ( @xmath195 ) or in the opposite direction of the uniform magnetic field ( @xmath196 ) . on the normalized em wave amplitude @xmath197 at @xmath198 . ] consider first the case of a medium with refractive index @xmath48 ( sign @xmath45under the root ) in eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) . we will turn on the em wave adiabatically and draw the graphic of dependence of the particle transversal momentum on the wave intensity @xmath199 . for the case @xmath200 the latter is illustrated in fig . as is seen from this graphic with the increase of the wave intensity the transversal momentum of the particle increases in the field ( consequently the energy as well ) and vice versa : with the decrease of the wave intensity it decreases in the field and after the passing of the wave ( @xmath201 ) the transversal momentum becomes zero ( @xmath202 ) , i.e. , the particle momentum - energy remain unchanged : @xmath203 and @xmath174 . with the increase of the transversal momentum the longitudinal velocity of the particle increases as well , but in contrast to the case @xmath204 it always remains smaller than the wave phase velocity if initially the wave overtakes the particle ( @xmath62 ) and larger if the particle overtakes the wave ( @xmath64 ) . for this reason the particle reflection phenomenon vanishes in the presence of a uniform magnetic field . indeed , as is seen from eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) for an arbitrary finite value of @xmath197 we have @xmath205 and longitudinal velocity of the particle in the field @xmath206 if @xmath207 and @xmath208 if @xmath64 . the value @xmath209 may be reached only at @xmath210 when the root in eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) becomes zero and @xmath211 . so , the expression under the root in eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) can not become zero for finite intensities of the em wave and , consequently , the root can not change its sign . consider now the case @xmath192 . the graphic of dependence of the particle transversal momentum on the wave intensity @xmath199 in this case is illustrated in fig . 7b . as is seen from this graphic @xmath199 is already a multivalent function : for wave intensities smaller than the value corresponding to the maximum point of the curve @xmath199 three values of the particle transversal momentum exist for each value of the wave intensity . at the maximum point , which will be called a critical one , the wave intensity has the value @xmath212 ^{3/2}. \label{4.63}\]]there are two values @xmath213 and @xmath214 which correspond to critical intensity ( [ 4.63 ] ) . the first one , @xmath215 , is the value of the parameter @xmath216 corresponding to particle transversal momentum at the maximum point of the curve @xmath217 . from the extremum condition of eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) for @xmath218 we have @xmath219 ^{1/2}. \label{4.64}\]]the second critical value for the parameter @xmath216 corresponding to critical intensity @xmath220 is situated on the left - hand side branch of the curve @xmath199 . to determine its value one needs the analytic solution @xmath221 of eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) , but there is no necessity here to present the bulk expression for @xmath222 . we shall decide on that branch of the curve @xmath199 which corresponds to real motion of the particle . up to the critical point the particle transversal momentum can be changed on that branch which corresponds to initial condition @xmath202 at @xmath223 . on this branch the particle momentum increases with the increase of the wave intensity and vice versa . it is evident that with further increase of the field the particle can not be situated on the right - hand side from the critical point . hence , it should pass to the left - hand side branch of the curve @xmath199 . indeed , it is easy to see that the critical point is an unstable state for the particle , while all states on the left - hand side branch of the curve @xmath199 are stable and at the critical point the particle changes instantaneously its transversal momentum and passes by jumping to that branch . the further variation of the particle transversal momentum occurs already on this branch . note that the instantaneity here is related to the fact that the solution of eq . ( [ 4.57 ] ) has been found for the monochromatic wave . it is clear that the momentum change actually occurs during finite time . this jump variation of the particle momentum ( energy ) is due to the induced resonant absorption of energy from the wave at the critical point because of which the particle state at this point becomes unstable and it leaves the resonance point for a stable state that corresponds to the transversal momentum @xmath222 on the left - hand side branch of the curve @xmath199 . indeed , if one draws a graphic of the dependence of the particle transversal momentum on the ratio of the larmor and wave frequencies @xmath224 for a certain intensity of the wave ( fig . 8) , then it will be seen from the graphic @xmath225 that the cyclotron resonance in the strong em wave field takes place at the critical point with the satisfaction of the condition @xmath226 . the latter means that to reach the cyclotron resonance in a medium , in contrast to vacuum autoresonance it is necessary to be initially under the resonance condition , since due to the effect of the strong wave field in a medium with refractive index @xmath48 the larmor frequency increases in the field and then reaches the resonance value . in vacuum the cyclotron resonance proceeds at @xmath227 which survives infinitely , because of which the energy of the particle turns to infinity . thus , from eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) in this case ( @xmath44 ) for the particle transversal momentum we have at @xmath228 @xmath229 which diverges ( consequently the energy as well ) at @xmath230 . as is seen from fig . 8 this divergence vanishes in a medium . with the further increase of the field ( @xmath231 ) the transversal momentum of the particle will continuously increase on the left - hand side branch of the curve @xmath199 and tend to value @xmath232 at @xmath233 . with the decrease of the field the transversal momentum decreases on this branch and at @xmath234 already has only the value @xmath222 since the value @xmath213 corresponds to the unstable state at the resonance point and now there is no reason for inverse transition from the stable state to the unstable one . with the further decrease of the field the transversal momentum decreases , but as is seen from fig . 7 after the interaction ( @xmath223 ) the particle does not return to the initial state ( @xmath235 at @xmath223 ) and remains with the final transversal momentum @xmath236 ^{1/2}. \label{4.66}\]]this is a nonlinear phenomenon of charged particle hysteresis @xcite in the cyclotron resonance with a strong em wave in a medium at intensities exceeding the threshold value ( [ 4.63 ] ) . the energy acquired by the particle due to hysteresis is given by @xmath237 . \label{4.68}\]]if the wave intensity is smaller than the critical value ( [ 4.63 ] ) the energy of the particle oscillates in the field and after the interaction remains unchanged ( such solution only has been obtained in the paper buchb ) . equation ( [ 4.68 ] ) determines the particle acceleration due to a strong transversal em wave at the cyclotron resonance with the powerful static magnetic field in a gaseous medium ( @xmath238 ) . because of the latter one can achieve the cyclotron resonance using optical ( laser ) radiation in a medium with the refractive index @xmath48 , since the doppler shift for a wave frequency @xmath239 ( see eq . ( [ 4.62 ] ) ) in this case may be arbitrarily small in contrast to vacuum , where the cyclotron resonance for the existing powerful static magnetic fields is possible only in the radio - frequency domain . on the other hand , the application of powerful laser radiation for large acceleration of the particles in gaseous media is confined by the ionization threshold of the medium . consider now the case of a plasmous medium ( @xmath43 ) . in eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) this case should take the sign @xmath56under the root at which the confinement for the particle transversal momentum , existing in a dielectriclike medium , vanishes . in addition , the above - considered behavior of the cyclotron resonance in a plasmous medium takes place with the inverse relation between the initial larmor and wave frequencies @xmath224 . thus , at @xmath240 with the increase of the wave intensity the transversal momentum of the particle increases in the field and vice versa : with the decrease of the wave intensity it decreases in the field and after the passing of the wave ( @xmath223 ) the transversal momentum becomes zero ( @xmath202 ) , i.e. , the particle momentum - energy remain unchanged : @xmath203 and @xmath174 . the nonlinear phenomenon of particle hysteresis in a plasmous medium takes place at @xmath241 , since in a medium with refractive index @xmath43 the larmor frequency decreases in the field and then becomes equal to the resonance value . on the normalized em wave amplitude @xmath197 at @xmath242 . ] the graphic of dependence of the particle transversal momentum on the wave intensity @xmath199 in this case is illustrated in fig . 9 . as is seen from this graphic , in contrast to the case of dielectriclike media the parameter @xmath243 in the plasmas increases with no limit at the increase of the field . the latter allows the large acceleration of the particles achieved by the current superstrong laser fields of ultrarelativistic intensities ( @xmath244 ) due to this phenomenon of hysteresis in the plasmas . the final transversal momentum of the particle as a result of the hysteresis in this case is @xmath245 ^{1/2 } , \label{4.69}\]]the final energy of which will be determined by the same equation ( [ 4.68 ] ) since both the numerator and denominator of the fraction in the expression analogous to eq . ( [ 4.68 ] ) for the particle energy in a plasma change sign . note an interesting effect at the cyclotron resonance in a medium as well . at @xmath227 no matter how weak the em wave field is @xmath246 @xmath171 ( that is , @xmath247 even for @xmath248 ) from eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) it follows that @xmath249that is , an essential nonlinearity ( @xmath250 ) arises in a case where one would expect a linear dependence on the field according to linear theory . it is the consequence of nonlinear cyclotron resonance the width of which is large enough in this case : @xmath251 the particle capture phenomenon may in principle serve as a fel mechanism ( cherenkov amplifier ) . for the latter one needs to solve the self - consistent problem on the basis of the set of maxwell vlasov equations . this problem can be solved analytically if the particle initial velocity in the capture regime is directed along the wave propagation and has a value close to the cherenkov one : @xmath252 ; parameter @xmath253 . the amplitude of the initial wave field should be a slowly varying function of the space - time coordinates ( @xmath97 , @xmath254 ) with respect to the phase . the problem is sensitive to the wave polarization , therefore it will be investigated for both circular and linear polarizations . consider at first the wave cherenkov amplification in the capture regime for the circular polarization of stimulated wave with the boundary conditions @xmath255 , @xmath256related to particle we assume that it crosses the boundary of the medium @xmath257 at the moment @xmath258 . to define the electric current of the particle stream we assume that the space is continuously filled with the charged particles . then at the moment @xmath259 in the point @xmath97 will be situated only the particles for which @xmath260 @xmath261 ( with accuracy of a small parameter @xmath253 ) . then for the self - consistent field we obtain the equation @xcite equation for self - consistent field has a simpler form over wave coordinates @xmath262 , @xmath263 . for the field amplitude in these coordinates @xmath264 we have @xmath265 . \label{37}\]]where @xmath266 is the mean density of the particles in the initial stream , which will be assumed constant ( since @xmath253 the variation @xmath267 is small and can be neglected).the simple analytic solution can be received at the incident monochromatic wave : @xmath268 @xmath186 . in this case @xmath269 does not depend on @xmath270 , i.e. , @xmath271 @xmath272 , and for the quantity @xmath273we have the nonlinear equation of anharmonic oscillator @xmath274the general solution of which is the incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind @xmath275@xmath276 in the linear case when @xmath277 from eq . ( [ 40 ] ) we have capture @xmath278hence , for @xmath279 , which corresponds to particles initial velocity @xmath280 , exponential amplification of the incident wave occurs . for @xmath281 , that is , @xmath282 , the amplification vanishes on average . the quantity in eq . ( [ 41 ] ) @xmath283is the coherent length of amplification . equation ( [ 37 ] ) is an analogue of the equation of the quantum amplifier . the role of inverse population in atomic systems here performs detuning of the cherenkov resonance @xmath284 ( parameter @xmath21 ) . consider now the case of linear polarization of incident wave @xmath285 . by analogy with the previous case for the slowly varying amplitude of the self - consistent field we have the equation @xmath286@xmath287according to which all harmonics are radiated in contrast to circular polarization of the wave . consider eq . ( [ 49 ] ) with regard to the presence and absence of synchronism . in the last case , when @xmath288 @xmath153 taking into account the slow variation of the field amplitude from eq . ( [ 49 ] ) we obtain capture @xmath289as is seen from this formula in the absence of synchronism , there is a weak dependence of radiation field on harmonics number . in the case of synchronism ( @xmath290 @xmath153 ) , ( [ 49 ] ) becomes @xmath291 for the first harmonic ( fundamental coherent radiation ) the results repeat almost exactly the case of wave circular polarization ( eqs . ( [ 40])(42 ) ) , the only difference being that the coherence length in this case is @xmath292 . to determine the radiation on the other harmonics in the case of synchronism consider the problem in the given field . then , for large @xmath97 when @xmath293for the harmonics amplitudes we have @xmath294hence , the radiation intensity on the harmonics @xmath295 as in the linear regime the coherence length increases as energy squared , and the losses of the particles in the medium depend on energy logarithmically , then the energy increase for amplification of weak signals does not give an essential advantage . the optimal energy is @xmath296 . then @xmath297 , where @xmath298 is the electron classical radius . the estimations show that for the amplification of optical radiation in the capture regime with @xmath299 , electron beams of large densities are necessary . the situation considerably will be improved if media with varying refraction index @xmath300 are used . then along the direction of increase of @xmath300 the particles will be continuously decelerated , and the wave continuously amplified ( a regime inverse to cherenkov accelerator ) . though the phenomenon of particle reflection from the front of a plane em wave is of classical nature , which means that quantum effects of above - barrier reflection and tunnel passage should be small enough , nevertheless the quantum consideration of this phenomenon is worthy of note in relation to the appearance of an important coherent quantum effect as a result of classical reflection of particles . the influence of spin interaction is not essential here ; on the other hand , it is quantitatively small enough in the induced cherenkov process ( for optical frequencies ) and may be neglected . the qualitative aspect of spin effects in the induced cherenkov process will be considered below . neglecting the spin interaction , the dirac equation in quadratic form becomes the klein gordon equation , the exact solution of which can be obtained when the particle initial velocity is parallel to the wave propagation direction ( @xmath301 ) and the latter is monochromatic of circular polarization ( @xmath302 ) . to calculate the probability of reflection from the wave barrier one needs to consider an em pulse with the envelope of intensity damped asymptotically at infinity . for a laser pulse of form @xmath303(@xmath304 is the maximal value of intensity and @xmath305 is the half - width of the pulse ) at @xmath306 for the coefficient of reflection we have @xmath307 } { 1+\exp \left [ \pi \widetilde{\omega } \tau _ { 0}\left ( \frac{\xi _ { 0}}{\xi _ { cr}}-1\right ) \right ] } . \label{85}\]]where@xmath308is the quantum frequency corresponding to particle classical energy change due to reflection ( see eq . ( [ 7 ] ) ) and @xmath72 is the classical value of critical intensity ( [ 6 ] ) . the major quantity @xmath309 in eq . ( [ 85 ] ) @xmath310 ( for actual parameters of electron and laser beams in a medium with refractive index @xmath311 the parameter @xmath312 for laser pulse duration @xmath313 @xmath314 ) , hence eq . ( 85 ) corresponds to above reflection regime @xmath306 . this equation shows that @xmath315 with great accuracy ( the coefficient of tunnel passage in this case is of the order @xmath316 $ ] ) . if @xmath317 then the coefficient of reflection @xmath318 with the same accuracy , i.e. the above barrier reflection is negligibly small in this case . thus , the quantum effects of tunnel passage and above barrier reflection do not impact on the classical phenomenon of particle reflection from the plane em wave . this is physically clear since the compton wavelength of a particle ( electron ) is much smaller than the space size of actual em pulses . nevertheless , due to the particle quantum feature as a result of classical reflection the coherent effect of quantum modulation of the free particle probability density and , consequently , electric current density occurs because of superposition of an incident and reflected particle s matter waves . the density of electric current of the particle beam is modulated at frequency @xmath319 @xmath320 \right\ } , \label{88}\]]where @xmath321 is the electric current density of the initially homogeneous and monochromatic particle beam . the modulation frequency @xmath319 in actual cases lies in the x - ray domain as follows from the estimation of particle classical energy change @xmath322 due to reflection ( @xmath323 @xmath324 /@xmath325 ) . note that quantum modulation in contrast to classical modulation is exceptionally the feature of a single particle and so is conserved after the interaction . consider now the role of spin effects in the nonlinear quantum dynamics of a spinor particle in the field of a plane monochromatic em wave in a medium , i.e. , in the reflection and capture phenomenon of an electron . the exact solution of the dirac equation for external electron ( with respect to wave ) can be found for the above - considered case when the particle initial velocity is parallel to the wave propagation direction and the latter is of circular polarization ( @xmath326 ) . in the result of spin interaction two critical values of the wave intensity appear corresponding to different initial spin projections @xmath327 along the direction of particle motion : @xmath328 ^{2}}{\left ( n^{2}-1\right ) } . \label{92}\]]and for particles energies we have respectively : @xmath329for the reflected particles energies with the spin projections @xmath330 and @xmath331 , respectively , we have : @xmath332@xmath333 in particular , from this equation it follows that in eq . ( [ 92 ] ) @xmath334 corresponds to a particle with the spin directed along the axis @xmath335 , while @xmath336 corresponds to the opposite one . the expressions of particle wave functions show that the degeneration of particle states over the spin projection that takes place in vacuum ( volkov states ) vanishes in a dielectriclike medium . in that case the wave function @xmath337 corresponds to superposition state with energies @xmath338 and @xmath339 , while @xmath340 corresponds to energies @xmath341 and @xmath342 . the removal of degeneration of volkov states is related to the fact that in a medium with refractive index @xmath48 in the intrinsic frame of reference of the wave there is only a static magnetic field and the spin interaction with such a field results in the splitting of the particle states as by the zeeman effect . the splitting value is : @xmath343 . in vacuum this splitting vanishes as it follows from eqs . ( [ 92]),([94 ] ) and dirac wave function in a medium passes to the volkov wave function ( @xcite ) . the spin interaction in a medium within the nonlinear threshold phenomenon of particle reflection may lead to particle beam polarization since the critical intensity ( [ 92 ] ) depends on spin projection along the direction of particle motion . thus , if the condition @xmath344 @xmath345 holds , then only the particles with certain direction of the spin ( along the axis @xmath335 ) will be reflected . since the velocities of reflected particles are different from the nonreflected ones , then by separating the particles after the interaction a polarized beam may be obtained . as was shown above , the exact solution of the dirac equation can be achieved only for the particular case when the particle initial velocity is parallel to the wave propagation direction , which is monochromatic and is of circular polarization . in other cases the quantum equations of motions ( both nonrelativistic and relativistic ) are reduced to ordinary differential equations of the second order of hill or mathieu type , the exact solution of which are unknown . in these cases one needs to develop adequate approximations for the quantum description of particle wave nonlinear interaction at the intensities close to critical value ( indeed below the threshold of classical reflectionphenomenon ) when the probabilities of multiphoton absorption / emission become maximal @xcite . the expected quantum effect in this case is electron reflection from the phase lattice of slowed em wave in a dielectric medium @xcite . note that on the base of this effect a nonlinear scheme of coherent x - ray source ( induced fel ) has been proposed @xcite . to solve dirac equation it is more straightforward to pass to the frame of reference of the rest of the wave ( @xmath346 frame moving with velocity @xmath347 ) . in the @xmath346 frame there is only the static magnetic field that will be described by the following vector potential @xmath348 , where the wavenumber in this frame @xmath349 . the wave function of a particle in the @xmath346 frame is connected with the wave function in the laboratory frame @xmath350 by the lorentz transformation of the bispinors @xmath351(@xmath352 ) . since the interaction hamiltonian does not depend on the time and transverse coordinates the eigenvalues of the hamiltonian @xmath353 and momentum operators @xmath354 , @xmath355 are conserved : @xmath356 , @xmath357 , @xmath358the solution of dirac equation for wave function @xmath359 can be represented in the form of a linear combination of free solutions of the dirac equation @xmath360 with amplitudes @xmath361 depending only on @xmath362 : @xmath363the solution in the form ( [ 72 ] ) corresponds to the expansion of the wave function in a complete set of the wave functions of a particle with certain energy and transverse momentum @xmath364 ( with longitudinal momenta @xmath365 and spin projections @xmath366 ) . the latter are normalized to one particle per unit volume . since there is symmetry with respect to the direction @xmath367 ( the @xmath35 axis ) , we have taken , without loss of generality , the vector @xmath368 in the @xmath369 plane @xmath370 . according to expansion ( [ 72 ] ) the induced cherenkov effect in the @xmath346 frame corresponds to elastic scattering process by which the reflection of the particle from the wave field occurs : @xmath371 . however , in contrast to classical reflection when the periodic wave field becomes a potential barrier for the particle at the intensity @xmath55 , this quantum above - barrier reflection takes place regardless of how weak the wave field is . hence , the probability of multiphoton absorption / radiation of the incident wave photons by the particle in the @xmath350 frame , that is , induced cherenkov effect , will be determined by the probability of particle elastic reflection in the @xmath346 frame . substituting eq . ( [ 72 ] ) into dirac equation and then multiplying by the hermitian conjugate functions we obtain a set of differential equations for the unknown functions @xmath372 . for simplicity we shall assume that before the interaction there are only particles with specified longitudinal momentum and spin state , i.e. , @xmath373from the condition of conservation of the norm we have @xmath374and the probability of reflection is @xmath375 . the equations for amplitudes @xmath376 , @xmath377 and @xmath378 , @xmath379 are separated and after unitarian transformation @xmath380 \label{74}\]]the problem simplifies and we obtain set of equations for the amplitudes @xmath381 and @xmath382 : @xmath383 b_{3,1}(x^{\prime } ) , \label{74a}\]]in unitarian transformation @xmath384 is the angle between the particle momentum and the direction of the wave propagation in the @xmath346 frame . the new amplitudes @xmath385 and @xmath382 satisfy the same initial conditions : @xmath386 @xmath387 according to eq . ( [ 73a ] ) . a similar set of equations is also obtained for the amplitudes @xmath388 and @xmath389 , then after unitarian transformation -for the amplitudes @xmath390 and @xmath391 . the new amplitudes @xmath385 and @xmath382 satisfy the same initial conditions : @xmath392 @xmath393 according to eq . ( [ 73a ] ) and @xmath394 because of conservation of particle energy and transverse momentum ( in @xmath346 frame ) the real transitions in the field will occur from a @xmath395 state to the @xmath396 one and , consequently , the probabilities of multiphoton scattering will have maximal values for the resonant transitions @xmath397the latter expresses the condition of exact resonance between the particle de broglie wave and the incident wave lattice . in the @xmath350 frame the inelastic scattering of the particle on the moving phase lattice takes place and eq . ( [ 75 ] ) corresponds to the known cherenkov conservation law @xmath398where @xmath25 is the angle between the particle momentum and the wave propagation direction ( the cherenkov angle ) , and @xmath399 and @xmath400 are the particle initial velocity and energy in the @xmath350 frame . at the exact resonance ( @xmath401 ) , according to the boundary conditions ( [ 73b ] ) for the reflection coefficient we have @xmath402 , \label{77a}\]]where @xmath403 is the coherent interaction length . the reflection coefficient in the laboratory frame of reference is the probability of absorption at @xmath62 or emission at @xmath404 . the latter can be obtained expressing the quantities @xmath405 and @xmath406 by the quantities in this frame since the reflection coefficient is lorentz invariant . so @xmath407 , \label{77b}\]]where @xmath408 ^{1/2}\]]@xmath409and @xmath410 for actual cases is the laser pulse duration in the @xmath350 frame . the condition of applicability of resonant approximation is equivalent to the condition @xmath411 which restricts the intensity of the wave as well as the cherenkov angle . besides , we must take into account the very sensitivity of the parameter @xmath412 toward the argument of bessel function , according to eq . ( [ 77c ] ) . for the wave intensities when @xmath413 the reflection coefficient is of the order of one that can occur for a large number of photons @xmath414 for the argument of the bessel function @xmath415 in eq . ( [ 77c ] ) ( according to the asymptotic behavior of bessel function @xmath416 at @xmath417 ) . for the off resonant solution , when @xmath418 , but @xmath419 we have the following expression for the reflection coefficient : @xmath420}{1+\frac{f_{s}^{2}}{\omega _ { s}^{2}}\sinh ^{2}[\omega _ { s}\triangle x^{\prime } ] } ; \text { \quad } \omega _ { s}=\sqrt{% f_{s}^{2}-\delta _ { s}^{2}/4 } , \label{78}\]]which has the same behavior as in the case of exact resonance . in the opposite case when @xmath421 the reflection coefficient is an oscillating function of interaction length . the multiphoton induced cherenkov interaction in the capture regime corresponding to transitions between the particle bound states occurs at the nonzero initial angles of particle motion with respect to the wave propagation direction , at which , as mentioned above , the dirac or klein gordon equations are of hill or mathieu type and unable to solve it exactly . however , as was shown in the quantum description of reflection phenomenon ( free free transitions ) , the interaction at the arbitrary initial angle resonantly connects two states of the particle ( in the intrinsic frame of reference of the wave the states with longitudinal momenta @xmath422 of the incident particle and @xmath423 of the scattered particle ; @xmath16 is the number of absorbed or radiated photons with a wave vector @xmath424 ) , which makes available the application of resonant approximation to determine the multiphoton probabilities of free free transitions in induced nonlinear cherenkov process . concerning the quantum description of the particle s bound states in the capture regime one must take into account the degeneration of initial states of free particles in the longitudinal momentum . therefore , regardless of how weak the field of the wave is , the usual perturbation theory in stimulated cherenkov process is not applicable because of such degeneration of the states , and the interaction near the resonance is needed for description by the secular equation . the latter , in particular , reveals the zone structure of the particle states in the field of a transverse em wave in a dielectriclike medium . note that in contrast to the zone structure for the energy of electron states in a crystal lattice , the zone structure in this process holds for the conserved quantity@xmath425 as the energy could not be quantum characteristic of the state in the nonstationary field of the wave @xcite . at first we will consider the case of scalar particles . according to floquet s theorem the solution of klein gordon equation in the wave coordinate @xmath270 may be represented in the form @xmath426where @xmath427 \label{100a}\]]is the major quantity in the induced nonlinear cherenkov process , which is the renormalized ( because of intensity effect ) generalized momentum of the particle in the laboratory frame conjugate to wave coordinate @xmath270 . it connects the width of initial cherenkov resonance @xmath428 @xmath429 and wave intensity ( @xmath430 ) as the main relation between the physical quantities of this process determining also the condition of nonlinear resonance ( @xmath431 ) . in the intrinsic frame of reference of the wave @xmath432 corresponds to longitudinal momentum @xmath422 of the particle on which the degeneration exists the recurrent equation for the coefficients @xmath433 can be solved in approximation of the perturbation theory by the wave function which is valid at the satisfaction of condition@xmath434 regarding those values @xmath432 for which condition ( [ 101a ] ) does not hold , the usual perturbation theory is already not applicable . in particular , if the expression on the left - hand side of this condition is zero , i.e. , at @xmath435 and @xmath436 ( @xmath437 ) , when @xmath438 it is evident that we already have two states @xmath439 and @xmath440 , which are degenerated in the longitudinal momentum @xmath432 , since @xmath441 . because of this double degeneration in the state parameter @xmath432 for the definite @xmath442 of the initial unperturbed system it is necessary to use perturbation theory for the degenerated states on the basis of the secular equation . thus , within secular perturbation theory from the compatibility of equations for @xmath443 and @xmath440 we have @xmath444 , where @xmath445 is the correction to the value @xmath446 at the fulfillment of condition ( [ 102 ] ) for @xmath447 : @xmath448by the standard method from eq . ( [ 104a ] ) one can obtain the following set of equations for the amplitudes @xmath439 and @xmath449 : . the signs @xmath56 and @xmath45 relate to @xmath450 and @xmath451 @xmath452 , respectively . thus , at the fulfillment of condition ( [ 102 ] ) we have a jump in the value of @xmath453 , which is equal to @xmath454 , i.e. , @xmath455 @xmath456 @xmath457 @xmath458 for @xmath447 the matrix element of transition from state @xmath439 to state @xmath449 ( here we note the state without a phase ) is equal to @xmath459 . for large @xmath460 ( @xmath461 ) the matrix element of transition @xmath462 is equal to zero in the first order of perturbation theory . in this case it makes sense to take into account the transitions to the states with other energies in higher order . for example , for @xmath463 it is necessary to consider the transitions @xmath464 and @xmath465 . for arbitrary @xmath460 the matrix element of transition is defined by @xmath466it should be noted that here it is also necessary to take into account the corrections to the energy eigenvalue of state @xmath439 in the appropriate order , however , the latter are only of quantitative character , unlike the qualitative corrections ( [ 107 ] ) , and will be omitted . as is seen from eq . ( [ 106 ] ) , the permitted and forbidden zones arise for the particle states in the wave . the widths of permitted zones in the general case of @xmath460-photon resonance are defined from the condition @xmath467 @xmath468 @xmath469 such zone structure for the particle states in the wave arises in dielectriclike media because of particle capture by the wave and periodic character of the field quantum influence of infinite potential wells on the particle states similar to zone structure of electron states in a crystal lattice @xcite . consider now the case of spinor particles . proceeding from the dirac equation for the components of the spinor @xmath470 : @xmath471 repeating the procedure as in the case of scalar particles , we obtain the bragg condition ( [ 102 ] ) , at which it is necessary to use the secular perturbation theory for degenerated states . at @xmath447 we obtain the following system of equations for coefficients @xmath472 and @xmath473 : @xmath474where @xmath475from eq . ( [ 117 ] ) for the correction to @xmath446 we obtain @xmath476it is easy to see that @xmath477 , where @xmath478 . hence , each spinor component of particle wave function has two values corresponding to the top and bottom borders of the first forbidden zone : @xmath479for @xmath480 we have the same expressions as ( [ 118 ] ) , where it is only necessary to replace @xmath481 by @xmath482 . at @xmath463 we have already two channels for the transition from state @xmath483 to state @xmath484 . the first is the result of the interaction described by a term quadratic in the field ( @xmath485 ) , the matrix element of which at @xmath463 is equal to @xmath486 , and the second channel proceeds both in the case of scalar particles via transitions @xmath487 and @xmath488 , stipulated by the charge interaction @xmath489 , as well as for the spin interaction , the matrix elements of which at each transition are equal to @xmath490 and @xmath491 , respectively . therefore , for two - photon transition for the main parameter correction to @xmath446 we obtain @xmath492 ^{\frac{1}{2 } } \label{119}\]]the obtained results for spinor particles are valid at the fulfillment of the condition @xmath493 . thus , the quantum picture of induced cherenkov interaction for charged spinor particles does not differ qualitatively from the case of scalar particles , i.e. , the spin interaction results only in quantitative corrections to the quantities describing the process . however , in the absence of charge interaction ( @xmath494 ) in the first order in the field , i.e. , for one - photon interaction , the first forbidden zone ( @xmath447 ) does not exist for scalar particles , but exists for spinor particles due to the spin interaction . coherent interaction of charged particles with a plane em wave of intensity smaller than the critical one in the induced cherenkov process leads to quantum modulation of the particle probability density and , consequently , current density after the interaction at the wave fundamental frequency and its harmonics . in contrast to classical modulation of particles current density proceeding in the free drift region after the interaction ( see , e.g. @xcite ) and conserving for short distances , the quantum modulation , being quantum feature of a single particle , is conserved after the interaction unlimitedly long @xcite . to reveal this quantum coherent effect it is necessary to take into account the quantum character of particle wave interaction entirely , i.e. the quantum recoil as well , in contrast to the eikonal approximation for particle wave function at the description of multiphoton interaction with strong em wave . the mathematical point of view requires taking into account in quantum equations of motion the second - order derivatives of the wave function as well , which are neglected in the eikonal approximation ( see , below the description of the diffraction effect ) . to describe the effect of particle quantum modulation with regard to the wave harmonics we will solve the klein gordon equation by perturbation theory in the field of monochromatic wave ( @xmath495 ) of intensity @xmath496 at which one can neglect again the constant term @xmath497 . then looking for the solution of klein gordon equation in the form which will be solved in the approximation of perturbation theory by wave function . thus , the amplitude of the particle wave function corresponding to @xmath16-photon induced radiation ( @xmath498 ) and absorption , respectively , reads @xmath499here the dimensionless parameter of one - photon interaction @xmath500is the small parameter of perturbation theory : @xmath501 @xmath502 and @xmath503are the dimensionless cherenkov resonance width and quantum recoil parameter , respectively . the current density of the particles after the interaction is given by the formula:@xmath504@xmath505 \cos s\omega \left ( t - nx / c\right)\]]@xmath506\]]@xmath507where @xmath508 is the current density of initially uniform particle beam . as is seen from eq . ( [ 3.109 ] ) as a result of direct and inverse induced cherenkov effect the current density of initially uniform particle beam is modulated at the wave fundamental frequency and its harmonics . this is a result of coherent superposition of particle states with various energy and momentum due to absorbed and emitted photons in the radiation field that remains after the interaction unlimitedly long ( for a monochromatic beam ) . the denominators in eq . ( [ 3.109 ] ) becomes zero at the fulfillment of exact quantum conservation law for multiphoton cherenkov process ( [ 75a ] ) . in this case perturbation theory is not applicable and the consideration in the scope of above - developed secular perturbation is required . however , in actual cases because of nonmonochromaticity of particle beams the width of cherenkov resonance is rather larger than quantum recoil ( @xmath509 ) and one can neglect the latter in eq . ( [ 3.109 ] ) . then the modulation depth ( @xmath510 ) at the wave fundamental frequency is expressed via critical intensity ( [ 9 ] ) : @xmath511 . the latter shows that the effect of quantum modulation at the stimulating wave harmonics proceeds at intensities smaller than the critical one when the induced cherenkov interaction of the particles with the periodic wave field ( photons ) occurs . in the opposite case the interaction proceeds with the potential barrier , and as was shown above the quantum modulation of the particles due to reflection phenomenon occurs because of interference of the incident and reflected electron s matter waves . for this reason the modulation frequency ( actually x - ray ) corresponds to particle s energy exchange in the result of interaction with the moving barrier . on the other hand , it is clear that the modulated by anyway particle beam is a coherent source of em radiation . consider now the induced compton and undulator processes in vacuum , at which the restriction on the wave intensity taking place in dielectric media for induced cherenkov process vanishes and one can use laser pulses of extremely large intensities to achieve laser acceleration of particles of superhigh energies by considering phenomena , as well as realization of many nonlinear qed phenomena from vacuum . at first let investigate the classical dynamics of a charged particle at the interaction with two bichromatic counterpropagating ( along the axis @xmath335 ) plane em waves ( with frequencies @xmath512 and @xmath513 ) in vacuum . relativistic equations of motion allow exact solution in case of monochromatic waves of circular polarization and if the particle initial momentum is directed along the axis of waves propagation ( initial transverse momentum @xmath514 ) . then for the particle energy in the field we have @xcite : as is seen from eq . ( [ 5.7 ] ) due to the effective interaction of the particle with the counterpropagating waves a slowed traveling wave in vacuum arises . the parameter @xmath517 denotes the refractive index of this interference wave and since @xmath521 ( see eq . ( [ 5.8 ] ) ) the phase velocity of the effective traveling wave @xmath522 . then the expression under the root in eq . ( [ 5.7 ] ) evidences the peculiarity in the interaction dynamics like the induced cherenkov one that causes the analogous threshold phenomena of particle reflection and capture by the interference wave in the induced compton process . hence , omitting the same procedure related to bypass of the multivalence and complexity of eq . ( [ 5.7 ] ) , which has been made in detail for the analogous expression in the cherenkov process , we will present the final results for particle reflection and capture by the effective interference wave in the induced compton process . the threshold value of the reflection phenomenon or the critical field for nonlinear compton resonance is @xmath523if one knows the longitudinal velocity @xmath166 of the particle in the field , then it is easy to see that @xmath524 is the value of the total intensity of counterpropagating waves at which @xmath525 becomes equal to the phase velocity of the effective interference wave : @xmath526 irrespective of the magnitude of particle initial velocity @xmath399 . the latter is the condition of coherency of induced compton process @xmath527under condition ( [ 5.10 ] ) the nonlinear resonance in the field of counterpropagating waves of different frequencies occurs and because of induced compton radiation / absorption the particle velocity becomes smaller or larger than the phase velocity of the interference wave and the particle leaves the slowed effective wave . in the rest frame of the latter the particle swoops on the motionless barrier ( if @xmath528 ) and the elastic reflection occurs . in the laboratory frame it corresponds to inelastic reflection and from eq . ( [ 5.7 ] ) for particle energy after the reflection ( @xmath529 adiabatically at @xmath530 ) we have @xmath531from this equation it follows that the energy of the particle with the initial velocity @xmath532 corresponding to the resonance value of the induced compton process does not change after the interaction ( @xmath52 ) . for such particle @xmath533 , i.e. , it can not enter the field : @xmath534 . the particle with the initial velocity @xmath535 after the reflection is decelerated , while at @xmath536 it is accelerated because of direct and inverse induced compton processes . at the acceleration the particle absorbs photons from the wave of frequency @xmath537 and coherently radiates into the wave of frequency @xmath513 if @xmath538 @xmath513 and at the deceleration the inverse process takes place . hence , at the particle acceleration the amplification of the wave of a smaller frequency holds , while at the deceleration the wave of a larger frequency is amplified . in the case of @xmath539 @xmath540 the refractive index of the interference wave @xmath541 and nonlinear interaction of the particle with the strong standing wave occurs . it is evident that in this case the process is elastic : @xmath542 ( see eq . ( [ 5.11 ] ) ) and for the longitudinal momentum of the particle in the field we have @xmath543from this equation it is seen that at @xmath544 @xmath545 the standing wave becomes a potential barrier for the particle and elastic reflection occurs : the root changes its sign and @xmath546 ( if @xmath547 @xmath548 we have @xmath549 ) . electrons `` reflection '' or capture phenomenon is also possible by a plane em wave propagating in electric or magnetic undulator / wiggler @xcite . as far as descriptions of electron dynamics in a plane monochromatic wave in the electric and magnetic undulators are coincide in many features , here we will consider only more important case of magnetic undulator / wiggler , which is currently the most perspective coherent tool with extremely large length of coherency , specifically due to which the x - ray free electron laser has been realized in the wiggler @xcite . consider the nonlinear dynamics of a charged particle at the interaction with a strong em wave in a magnetic undulator / wiggler . let a particle with an initial velocity @xmath550 enters into a magnetic undulator with circularly polarized field @xmath551(@xmath552 is the space period or step of an undulator ) along the axis of which propagates a plane monochromatic em wave of circular polarization . relativistic equations of motion in this case allow exact solution and for the particle energy we have @xcite : @xmath553@xmath554 \biggr]^{1/2}\biggr\ } \label{5.25}\]]where relativistic invariant dimensionless interaction parameter @xmath555(for large magnitudes of undulator field strength @xmath556 and space period @xmath552 when @xmath557 such undulator is called a wiggler ) . from eq . ( [ 5.25 ] ) it follows that at the particle wave nonlinear resonance interaction in the undulator an effective slowed traveling wave is formed as in the induced compton process . the parameter @xmath558is the refractive index of this slowed wave , which causes the analogous threshold phenomenon of particle reflection in the induced undulator process . the effective critical field at which the nonlinear resonance and then the particle reflection take place in the undulator , is @xmath559at this value of the resulting field the longitudinal velocity of the particle @xmath166 reaches the resonant value in the field at which the condition of coherency in the undulator @xmath560is satisfied . the latter has a simple physical explanation in the intrinsic frame of the particle . in this frame of reference the static magnetic field ( [ 5.18 ] ) becomes a traveling em wave with the frequency @xmath561and phase velocity @xmath562 . for coherent interaction process this frequency must coincide with the doppler - shifted frequency of stimulated wave . the energy of the particle after the reflection ( in eq . ( [ 5.25 ] ) @xmath563 at the sign @xmath56 before the root ) is @xmath564 . \label{5.30}\]]from this equation it follows that the particle with the initial velocity @xmath565 after the reflection accelerates , while at @xmath566 it decelerates because of induced undulator radiation . the reflection phenomenon of charged particles from a plane em wave , as was shown in the induced cherenkov process , may be used for monochromatization of the particle beams . note that the considered vacuum versions of this phenomenon are more preferable for this goal taking into account the influence of negative effects of the multiple scattering and ionization losses in a medium . on the other hand , the refractive index of the effective slowed waves in vacuum @xmath517 or @xmath567 in corresponding induced compton and undulator processes may be varied choosing the appropriate frequencies of counterpropagating waves or wiggler step . in particular , for monochromatization of particle beams with moderate or low energies via the induced cherenkov process one needs a refractive index of a medium @xmath568 that corresponds to solid states . meanwhile , such values of effective refractive index may be reached in the induced compton process at the frequencies @xmath569 of the counterpropagating waves . however , we will not consider here the possibility of particle beam monochromatization on the basis of the vacuum versions of reflection phenomenon since the principle of conversion of energetic or angular spreads is the same . to study the subject in more detail we refer the reader to original papers comp._mon.,und._mon.,conv .. considered above quantum effects in the induced cherenkov process as in the above critical regime , as well as below the critical point also take place in described vacuum versions of particle reflection and capture phenomena at the induced compton and undulator / wiggler nonlinear interaction . however , because of similar physical picture and investigation methods we will not repeat here the consideration of these effects . as was mentioned in introduction , at the wave intensities below the threshold of particle reflection and capture phenomena , the inelastic diffraction scattering of electron matter wave de broglie wave on a traveling light phase - lattice in the induced cherenkov , compton , and undulator processes is possible . for efficient probabilities of multiphoton diffraction effect on such wave - gratings the intensities of slowed traveling wave should be close to the critical value : @xmath570 to be near the nonlinear resonance of particle - wave interaction in each induced process . we will proceed the solution of diffraction effect in general form for cherenkov and vacuum processes . as the coordinates @xmath571 are cyclic , then the corresponding components of generalized momentum @xmath572 are conserved . hence , according to floquet s theorem the solution of klein gordon equation may be sought in the form @xmath573where @xmath574and we will assume that @xmath575 are slowly varying functions : @xmath576 and @xmath577 ( this condition is always satisfied for optical photons ) . from the klein gordon equation with eq . ( [ psi1 ] ) for the coefficients @xmath578 we obtain the set of equations@xmath579where@xmath580is the resonance width . the wave function ( [ psi1 ] ) at the initial condition @xmath581 describes inelastic scattering of the electron on the slowed traveling wave . the electron energy and momentum after the scattering are:@xmath582@xmath583the probability of these processes are determined by the coefficients @xmath584 @xmath585 we will represent the solution of equations eqs . ( [ m2 ] ) in the two interaction regimes : diffraction at the classical conditions of coherency ( [ 5.10 ] ) , ( [ 5.29 ] ) and bragg resonance at the exact quantum conditions of coherency with the quantum recoil of electron due to photon absorption / radiation . [ [ diffraction - regime - of - electron - coherent - scattering - on - the - traveling - wave - phase - lattice ] ] diffraction regime of electron coherent scattering on the traveling wave phase - lattice ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ for the finite electron - wave interaction time the interaction energy is uncertain by the quantity @xmath586 . the diffraction regime of electron coherent scattering corresponds to the short interaction times and intense wave fields . thus , at the satisfaction of the conditions @xmath587one can neglect the term @xmath588 in eqs . ( [ m2 ] ) and the dynamics of electron in the wavefields will be described by the following equation @xcite : @xmath589for which at the initial condition @xmath581 one can obtain the following solution : @xmath590consequently , the probability of this process according to eq . ( [ prob ] ) will be done by the formula : @xmath591 . \label{3.98}\]]in the case of a monochromatic wave from eq . ( [ 3.98 ] ) we have @xmath592where @xmath593 is the time - duration of the particle motion in the wavefield . as is seen from eq . ( [ main ] ) in the diffraction regime symmetric diffraction ( @xmath594 ) into many momentum states is possible . the process dynamics is defined by the argument of the bessel function @xmath595 . for @xmath596 only few diffraction maxima are possible . for the values @xmath597 , the process is essentially multiphoton . the most probable number of absorbed / emitted cherenkov photons is @xmath598 . the width of the main diffraction maximums @xmath599 and since @xmath600 then @xmath601 . for the concreteness let us explicitly write probability for the cherenkov diffraction and kapitza dirac effects . in case of cherenkov diffraction of electron on a traveling wave in a dielectric medium , from eq . ( [ main ] ) we have @xmath602for the actual values of the parameters @xmath603 , that is , the process is essentially multiphoton . the most probable number of absorbed / emitted cherenkov photons is @xmath604the scattering angles of the @xmath16-photon cherenkov diffraction are determined by the formula : @xmath605from eq . ( [ 3.101 ] ) it follows that at the inelastic diffraction there is an asymmetry in the angular distribution of the scattered particle : @xmath606 , i.e. , the main diffraction maxima are situated at different angles with respect to the direction of particle initial motion . however , in accordance with the condition @xmath607 of the eikonal approximation this asymmetry is negligibly small and for the scattering angles of the main diffraction maxima from eq . ( [ 3.101 ] ) we have @xmath608 . hence , the main diffraction maxima will be situated at the angles @xmath609with respect to the direction of the particle initial motion . for the kapitza dirac effect , which is the particular case of induced compton effect at @xmath610 , @xmath611 , from eqs . ( [ psi1 ] ) and ( [ main ] ) we can write@xmath612hence , the probability of @xmath16-photons kapitza dirac diffraction effect on the strong standing em wave in vacuum is determined by the formula : @xmath613note that formula ( [ kp2 ] ) for the nonrelativistic case @xmath614 coincides with analogous formula ( 7 ) of the paper @xcite up to a factor of @xmath615 ( in the paper @xcite ) the factor @xmath615 has been missed perhaps at the transformation of recurrent relation of bessel functions @xmath616 ) . in general case of inelastic compton diffraction on counterpropagating waves of different frequencies and electron diffraction on a travelling em wave in an undulator / wiggler the probabilities of @xmath16-photon diffraction effect may be written by analogy of formulas ( [ 3.99 ] ) and ( [ kp2 ] ) with corresponding parameters . note that the general formula ( [ 3.99 ] ) for cherenkov diffraction that expresses the probabilities of multiphoton absorption / radiation processes by electron at the induced cherenkov effect has been applied in the paper ushir for explanation of the experiment on energetic widening of an electron beam at the induced cherenkov process in a gaseous medium , implemented in slac @xcite ( see , also the next experiment of this group @xcite , made in the same conditions ) . formula ( [ 3.99 ] ) for cherenkov diffraction in a dielectric medium , which had been received forty years ago @xcite and included in the monographs @xcite and @xcite , recently has been considered in the paper @xcite because of reproduction of electron diffraction effect on a travelling em wave in a dielectric medium by the authors of the paper mis , nevertheless represented it as a new phenomenon predicted in the paper @xcite . repeating the results of the paper @xcite with the main formula ( [ 3.99 ] ) in other way of derivation -within the helmholtz kirchhoff diffraction theory ( as was mentioned in introduction , by the method developed in the paper @xcite ) , authors report in the abstract that they showed on the possibility of electrons diffraction effect on a travelling em wave in a dielectric medium . apart from such misunderstanding resulted to serious confusion in scientific literature , it is interesting the claim of the authors even in the abstract of the paper @xcite ( and this is the only difference from the paper @xcite ) that explains diffraction effect by the `` group velocity of light '' ( and this is repeated also in the text -and for a monochromatic wave ! ) . this is interesting fact since repeating the results , at the same time authors of the paper @xcite quote to original papers @xcite without a comment . while , as it has been shown above , diffraction effect is thoroughly the result of the phase relations and is conditioned exceptionally by the phase velocity of light that must be smaller than @xmath28 just the physical reason which causes electron diffraction on a light phase lattice due to phase matching between the particle and wave phase velocity . beside this rough mistake , authors of the paper @xcite ignored the existence of critical field in this process and influence of considered phenomenon of particle `` reflection '' or capture on the diffraction effect . meanwhile , one of the authors @xcite is also a co - author of both inelastic diffraction effect @xcite and `` reflection '' phenomenon in the undulators @xcite . [ [ bragg - regime - of - electron - coherent - scattering - on - the - traveling - wave - phase - lattice ] ] bragg regime of electron coherent scattering on the traveling wave phase - lattice ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ the condition ( [ res_q ] ) has transparent physical interpretation in the intrinsic frame of reference of the slowed wave . in this frame , due to the conservation of particle energy and transverse momentum the real transitions in this strongly quantum regime occur from a @xmath395 state to the @xmath620 one and we reach the bragg diffraction effect on a slowed traveling wave at the fulfilment of the condition : @xmath621the latter expresses the condition of exact resonance between the particle de broglie wave and the wave motionless lattice . in particular , in this case when the above mentioned particle capture regime by the slowed traveling wave @xcite takes place , we have the quantum effect of zone structure of particle states like the particle states in a crystal lattice , and at the condition ( res_q ) the diffraction maxima take place see fig . 1 . here we just write the solution for the resonant case @xmath622at the condition@xmath623from the set of equations ( [ m2 ] ) one can keep only resonant ones for @xmath624 and @xmath625:@xmath626with the solution@xmath627for the concreteness let us explicitly write probability for kapitza dirac effect - @xmath610 , @xmath628 , @xmath629 ) . from eq . ( [ res_q ] ) at @xmath630 we obtain resonant initial momentum @xmath631 and wave function can be writen as @xmath632 . \label{w}\]]with the probabilities @xmath633for the nonrelativistic case @xmath634 eqs . ( [ bregp ] ) coinside with the results in ref . Abstract:
[ "with the appearance of superpower laser sources of relativistic / ultrarelativistic intensities in the last decade , the laser - qed - vacuum - matter interaction physics has entered a new phase that makes real the observation of many nonlinear quantum electrodynamic ( qed ) and classical - quantum- mechanical phenomena revealed more than fore - five decades ago , serious advance in new generation of laser - plasma accelerators of ultrahigh energies , nuclear fusion etc . hence , the present review article will help explorers - experimentalists in this field to attract attention on the fundamental properties and peculiarities of the dynamics of induced free - free transitions at high and superhigh intensities of stimulated radiation fields . in this connection it is of special interest the induced cherenkov , compton , undulator / wiggler coherent processes , as well as cyclotron resonance in a medium possessing with nonlinear resonances of threshold nature and leading to many important nonlinear effects or applications , which are considered in this review ." ]
17,970
17,970
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: many important problems in the theory of integrable systems and approximation theory can be recast as riemann - hilbert problems for a matrix - valued unknown . via the connection with approximation theory , and specifically the theory of orthogonal polynomials , one can also study problems from the theory of random matrix ensembles and combinatorics . roughly speaking , solving a riemann - hilbert problem amounts to reconstructing a sectionally meromorphic matrix from given homogeneous multiplicative `` jump conditions '' at the boundary contours of the domains of meromorphy , from `` principal part data '' given at the prescribed singularities , and from a normalization condition . so , many asymptotic questions in integrable systems ( _ e.g. _ long time behavior and singular perturbation theory ) and approximation theory ( _ e.g. _ behavior of orthogonal polynomials in the limit of large degree ) amount to determining asymptotic properties of the solution matrix of a riemann - hilbert problem from given asymptotics of the jump conditions and principal part data . in recent years a collection of techniques has emerged for studying certain asymptotic problems of this sort . these techniques are analogous to familiar asymptotic methods for expanding oscillatory integrals , and we often refer to them as `` steepest - descent '' methods . the basic method first appeared in the work of deift and zhou @xcite . the first applications were to riemann - hilbert problems without poles , in which the solution matrix is sectionally holomorphic . later , some problems were studied in which there were a number of poles a number held fixed in the limit of interest in the solution matrix ( see , for example , the paper @xcite on the long - time behavior of the toda lattice with rarefaction initial data ) . the previous methods were extended to these more complicated problems through the device of making a local change of variable near each pole in some small domain containing the pole . the change of variable is chosen so that it has the effect of removing the pole at the cost of introducing an explicit jump on the boundary of the domain around the pole in which the transformation is made . the result is a riemann - hilbert problem for a sectionally holomorphic matrix , which can be solved asymptotically by pre - existing `` steepest - descent '' methods . recovery of an approximation for the original sectionally meromorphic matrix unknown involves putting back the poles by reversing the explicit change of variables that was designed to get rid of them to begin with . yet another category of riemann - hilbert problems consists of those problems where the number of poles is not fixed , but becomes large in the limit of interest , with the poles accumulating on some closed set @xmath0 in the finite complex plane . a problem of this sort has been addressed @xcite by making an explicit transformation of the type described above in a single fixed domain @xmath1 that contains the locus of accumulation @xmath0 of all the poles . the transformation is chosen to get rid of all the poles at once . in order to specify it , discrete data related to the residues of the poles must be interpolated at the corresponding poles by a function that is analytic and nonvanishing in all of @xmath1 . once the poles have been removed in this way , the riemann - hilbert problem becomes one for a sectionally holomorphic matrix , with a jump at the boundary of @xmath1 given in terms of the explicit change of variables . in this way , the poles are `` swept out '' from @xmath0 to the boundary of @xmath1 resulting in an analytic jump . there is a strong analogy in this procedure with the concept of balayage ( meaning `` sweeping out '' ) from potential theory . in establishing asymptotic formulae for such riemann - hilbert problems , it is essential that one make judicious use of the freedom to place the boundary of the domain in which one removes the poles from the problem . placing this boundary contour in the correct position in the complex plane allows one to convert oscillations into exponential decay in such a way that the errors in the asymptotics can be rigorously controlled . if the poles accumulate with some smooth density on @xmath2 , the characterization of the correct location of the boundary of @xmath1 can be determined by first passing to a continuum limit of the pole distribution in the resulting jump matrix on the boundary of @xmath1 , and then applying analytic techniques or variational methods . the continuum limit is justified as long as the boundary of @xmath1 remains separated from @xmath0 . this idea leads to an interesting question . what happens if the boundary of @xmath1 as determined from passing to the continuum limit turns out to intersect @xmath0 ? far from being a hypothetical possibility , this situation is known to occur in at least three different problems : 1 . * the semiclassical limit of the focusing nonlinear schrdinger hierarchy with decaying initial data . * see @xcite . this is an inverse - scattering problem for the nonselfadjoint zakharov - shabat operator . on an _ ad hoc _ basis , one replaces the true spectral data for the given initial condition with a formal wkb approximation . there is no jump in the riemann - hilbert problem associated with inverse - scattering for the modified spectral data , but there are poles accumulating asymptotically with the wkb density of states on an interval @xmath0 of the imaginary axis in the complex plane of the eigenvalue . the methods described above turn out to yield rigorous asymptotics for this modified inverse - scattering problem as long as the independent time variable in the equation is not zero . for @xmath3 , the argument of passing to the continuum limit in the pole density leads one to choose the boundary of @xmath1 to _ coincide _ in part with the interval @xmath0 . strangely , if one sets @xmath3 in the problem from the beginning , an alternative method due to lax and levermore @xcite and extended to the nonselfadjoint zakharov - shabat operator with real potentials by ercolani , jin , levermore , and macevoy @xcite can be used to carry out the asymptotic analysis in this special case ; this alternative method is not based on matrix riemann - hilbert problems , and therefore when taken together with the methods described in @xcite does not result in a uniform treatment of the semiclassical limit for all @xmath4 and @xmath5 . at the same time , the lax - levermore method that applies when @xmath3 fails in this problem when @xmath6 . 2 . * the zero - dispersion limit of the korteweg - de vries equation with potential well initial data . * as pointed out above , the original treatment of this problem by lax and levermore @xcite was not based on asymptotic analysis for a matrix - valued riemann - hilbert problem . but it is possible to pose the inverse - scattering problem with modified ( wkb ) spectral data as a matrix - valued riemann - hilbert problem and ask whether the `` steepest descent '' techniques for such problems could be used to reproduce and/or strengthen the original asymptotic results of lax and levermore . in particular , we might point out that the lax - levermore method only gives weak limits of the conserved densities , and that a modification due to venakides @xcite is required to extract any pointwise asymptotics ( _ i.e. _ to reconstruct the microstruture of the modulated and rapidly oscillatory wavetrains giving rise to the leading - order weak asymptotics ) . on the other hand , `` steepest descent '' techniques for matrix - valued riemann - hilbert problems typically give pointwise asymptotics automatically . it would therefore be most useful if these techniques could be applied to provide a new and unified approach to this problem . + if one tries to enclose the locus of accumulation of poles ( wkb eigenvalues for the schrdinger operator with a potential well ) with a contour and determine the optimal location of this contour for zero - dispersion asymptotics , it turns out that the contour must contain the support of a certain weighted logarithmic equilibrium measure . it is a well - known consequence of the lax - levermore theory that the support of this measure is a subset of the interval of accumulation of wkb eigenvalues . consequently , the enclosing contour `` wants '' to lie right on top of the poles in this problem , and the approach fails . in a sense this failure of the `` steepest descent '' method is more serious than in the analogous problem for the focusing nonlinear schrdinger equation because the contour is in the wrong place for all values of @xmath4 and @xmath5 ( the independent variables of the problem ) , whereas in the focusing nonlinear schrdinger problem the method fails generically only for @xmath3 . * the large degree limit of certain systems of discrete orthogonal polynomials . * fokas , its , and kitaev @xcite have shown that the problem of reconstructing the orthogonal polynomials associated with a given continuous weight function can be expressed as a matrix - valued riemann - hilbert problem . it is not difficult to modify their construction to the case when the weight function is a sum of dirac masses . the corresponding matrix - valued riemann - hilbert problem has no jump , but has poles at the support nodes of the weight . the solution of this riemann - hilbert problem gives in this case the associated family of discrete orthogonal polynomials . if one takes the nodes of support of the discrete weight to be distributed asymptotically in some systematic way , then it is natural to ask whether `` steepest descent '' methods applied to the corresponding riemann - hilbert problem with poles could yield accurate asymptotic formulae for the discrete orthogonal polynomials in the limit of large degree . indeed , similar asymptotics were obtained in the continuous weight case @xcite using precisely these methods . + unfortunately , when the poles are encircled and the optimal contour is sought , it turns out again to be necessary that the contour contain the support of a certain weighted logarithmic equilibrium measure ( see @xcite for a description of this measure ) which is supported on a subset of the interval of accumulation of the nodes of orthogonalization ( _ i.e. _ , the poles ) . for this reason , the method based on matrix - valued riemann - hilbert problems would appear to fail . in this paper , we present a new technique in the theory of `` steepest descent '' asymptotic analysis for matrix riemann - hilbert problems that solves all three problems mentioned above in a general framework . we illustrate the method in detail for the first case described above : the inverse - scattering problem for the nonselfadjoint zakharov - shabat operator with modified ( wkb ) spectral data , which amounts to a treatment of the semiclassical limit for the focusing nonlinear schrdinger equation at the initial instant @xmath3 . this work thus fills in a gap in the arguments in @xcite connecting the rigorous asymptotic analysis carried out there with the initial - value problem for the focusing nonlinear schrdinger equation . application of the same techniques to the zero dispersion limit of the korteweg - de vries equation will be the topic of a future paper , and a study of asymptotics for discrete orthogonal polynomials using these methods is already in preparation @xcite . the initial - value problem for the focusing nonlinear schrdinger equation is @xmath7 subject to the initial condition @xmath8 . in @xcite , this problem is considered for cases when the initial data @xmath9 where @xmath10 is some positive real function @xmath11 $ ] . the function @xmath10 is taken to decay rapidly at infinity and to be even in @xmath4 with a single genuine maximum at @xmath12 . thus @xmath13 , @xmath14 , and @xmath15 . also , the function @xmath10 is taken to be real - analytic . with this given initial data , one has a unique solution of ( [ eq : nls ] ) for each @xmath16 . to study the semiclassical limit then means determining asymptotic properties of the family of solutions @xmath17 as @xmath18 . this problem is associated with the scattering and inverse - scattering theory for the nonselfadjoint zakharov - shabat eigenvalue problem @xcite : @xmath19 for auxiliary functions @xmath20 and @xmath21 . the complex number @xmath22 is a spectral parameter . under the conditions on @xmath10 described above , it is known only that for each @xmath16 the discrete spectrum of this problem is invariant under complex conjugation and reflection through the origin . however , a formal wkb method applied to ( [ eq : zs ] ) suggests for small @xmath23 a distribution of eigenvalues that are confined to the imaginary axis . the same method suggests that the reflection coefficient for scattering states obtained for real @xmath22 is small beyond all orders . it is therefore natural to propose a modification of the problem . rather than studying the inverse - scattering problem for the true spectral data ( which is not known ) , simply replace the true spectral data by its formal wkb approximation in which the eigenvalues are given by a quantization rule of bohr - sommerfeld type , and in which the reflection coefficient is neglected entirely . for each @xmath16 , this modified spectral data is the _ true _ spectral data for some other ( @xmath23-dependent ) initial condition @xmath24 . since there is no reflection coefficient in the modified problem , it turns out that for each @xmath23 the solution of ( [ eq : nls ] ) corresponding to the modified initial data @xmath24 is an exact @xmath25-soliton solution , with @xmath26 . we call such a family of @xmath25-soliton solutions , all obtained from the same function @xmath10 by a wkb procedure , a _ semiclassical soliton ensemble _ , or sse for short . we will be more precise about this idea in [ sec : sses ] . in @xcite , the asymptotic behavior of sses was studied for @xmath6 . although the results were rigorous , it was not possible to deduce anything about the _ true _ initial - value problem for ( [ eq : nls ] ) with @xmath27 because the asymptotic method failed for @xmath3 . in this paper , we will explain the following new result . let @xmath10 be real - analytic , even , and decaying with a single genuine maximum at @xmath12 . let @xmath28 be for each @xmath16 the exact initial value of the sse corresponding to @xmath10 ( see [ sec : sses ] ) . then , there exists a sequence of values of @xmath23 , @xmath29 for @xmath30 , such that @xmath31 and such that for all @xmath32 , there exists a constant @xmath33 such that @xmath34 for all @xmath35 . [ theorem : mainresult ] as @xmath28 is obtained by an inverse - scattering procedure applied to wkb spectral data , this theorem establishes in a sense the validity of the wkb approximation for the zakharov - shabat eigenvalue problem ( [ eq : zs ] ) . it says that the true spectral data and the formally approximate spectral data generate , via inverse - scattering , potentials in the zakharov - shabat problem that are pointwise close . the omission of @xmath12 is merely technical ; a procedure slightly different from that we will explain in this paper is needed to handle this special case . we will indicate as we proceed the modifications that are necessary to extend the result to the whole real line . the pointwise nature of the asymptotics is important ; the variational methods used in @xcite suggest convergence only in the @xmath36 sense . rigorous statements about the nature of the wkb approximation for the zakharov - shabat problem are especially significant because the operator in ( [ eq : zs ] ) is nonselfadjoint and the spectrum is not confined to any axis ; furthermore sturm - liouville oscillation theory does not apply . each @xmath25-soliton solution of the focusing nonlinear schrdinger equation ( [ eq : nls ] ) can be found as the solution of a meromorphic riemann - hilbert problem with no jumps ; that is , a problem whose solution matrix is a rational function of @xmath37 . the @xmath25-soliton solution depends on a set of discrete data . given @xmath25 complex numbers @xmath38 in the upper half - plane ( these turn out to be discrete eigenvalues of the spectral problem ( [ eq : zs ] ) ) , and @xmath25 nonzero constants @xmath39 ( which turn out to be related to auxiliary discrete spectrum for ( [ eq : zs ] ) ) , and an index @xmath40 , one considers the matrix @xmath41 solving the following problem : find a matrix @xmath41 with the following two properties : 1 . * rationality : * @xmath41 is a rational function of @xmath22 , with simple poles confined to the values @xmath42 and the complex conjugates . at the singularities : @xmath43\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,,\\\\ \displaystyle \mathop{\rm res}_{\lambda=\lambda_k^ * } { \bf m}(\lambda)&=&\displaystyle\lim_{\lambda\rightarrow\lambda_k^*}{\bf m}(\lambda ) \sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\left[\begin{array}{cc}0 & -c_k(x , t)^*\\0 & 0\end{array } \right]\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , , \end{array } \label{eq : residuerelation}\ ] ] for @xmath44 , with @xmath45 2 . * normalization : * @xmath46 [ rhp : meromorphic ] here , @xmath47 denotes one of the pauli matrices : @xmath48\ , , \hspace{0.2 in } \sigma_2:=\left[\begin{array}{cc } 0 & -i\\i & 0\end{array}\right]\ , , \hspace{0.2 in } \sigma_3:=\left[\begin{array}{cc } 1 & 0\\0 & -1\end{array}\right]\,.\ ] ] the function @xmath17 defined from @xmath41 by the limit @xmath49 is the @xmath25-soliton solution of the focusing nonlinear schrdinger equation ( [ eq : nls ] ) corresponding to the data @xmath42 and @xmath50 . the index @xmath51 will be present throughout this work , so it is worth explaining its role from the start . it turns out that if @xmath52 , then the solution @xmath41 of riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : meromorphic ] has the property that for all fixed @xmath22 distinct from the poles , @xmath53 as @xmath54 . likewise , if @xmath55 , then @xmath56 as @xmath57 . so as far as scattering theory is concerned , the index @xmath51 indicates an arbitrary choice of whether we are performing scattering `` from the right '' or `` from the left '' . both versions of scattering theory yield the same function @xmath17 via the relation ( [ eq : potentialrecovery ] ) , and are in this sense equivalent . however , the inverse - scattering problem involves the independent variables @xmath4 and @xmath5 for ( [ eq : nls ] ) as parameters , and it may be the case that for different choices of @xmath4 and @xmath5 , different choices of the parameter @xmath51 may be more convenient for asymptotic analysis of the matrix @xmath41 solving riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : meromorphic ] . that this is indeed the case was observed and documented in @xcite . so we need the freedom to choose the index @xmath51 , and therefore we need to carry it along in our calculations . a _ semiclassical soliton ensemble _ ( sse ) is a family of particular @xmath25-soliton solutions of ( [ eq : nls ] ) indexed by @xmath58 that are formally associated with given initial data @xmath59 via an _ ad hoc _ wkb approximation of the spectrum of ( [ eq : zs ] ) . note that the initial data @xmath59 may not exactly correspond to a pure @xmath25-soliton solution of ( [ eq : nls ] ) for any @xmath23 , and similarly that typically none of the @xmath25-soliton solutions making up the sse associated with @xmath59 will agree with this given initial data at @xmath3 . we will now describe the discrete data @xmath42 and @xmath50 that generate , via the solution of riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : meromorphic ] and the subsequent use of the formula ( [ eq : potentialrecovery ] ) , the sse associated with a function @xmath59 . we suppose that @xmath10 is an even function of @xmath4 that has a single maximum at @xmath12 , and is therefore `` bell - shaped '' . we will need @xmath10 to be rapidly decreasing for large @xmath4 , and we will suppose that the maximum @xmath60 is genuine in that @xmath15 . most importantly in what follows , we will assume that @xmath10 is a real - analytic function of @xmath4 . the starting point is the definition of the wkb eigenvalue density function @xmath61 : @xmath62 defined for positive imaginary numbers @xmath63 in the interval @xmath64 , where @xmath65 and @xmath66 are the ( unique by our assumptions ) negative and positive values of @xmath4 for which @xmath67 . the wkb eigenvalues asymptotically fill out the interval @xmath64 , and @xmath61 is their asymptotic density . this function inherits analyticity properties in @xmath63 from those of @xmath10 via the functions @xmath68 . our assumption that @xmath10 is real - analytic makes @xmath61 an analytic function of @xmath63 in its imaginary interval of definition . also , our assumption that @xmath10 should be rapidly decreasing makes @xmath61 analytic at @xmath69 , and our assumption that @xmath10 have nonvanishing curvature at its maximum makes @xmath61 analytic at @xmath70 . from this function it is convenient to define a measure of the number of wkb eigenvalues between a point @xmath71 on the imaginary axis and @xmath72 : @xmath73 now , each @xmath25-soliton solution in the sse for @xmath10 will be associated with a particular value @xmath29 , namely @xmath74 where @xmath75 . in this sense we are taking the values of @xmath23 themselves to be `` quantized '' . clearly for any given @xmath10 , @xmath76 which goes to zero as @xmath25 becomes large . for each @xmath75 , we then define the wkb eigenvalues formally associated with @xmath10 according to the bohr - sommerfeld rule @xmath77 and the auxiliary scattering data by @xmath78 here , @xmath79 is an arbitrary integer . clearly the bohr - sommerfeld rule ( [ eq : bs ] ) implies that choosing different integer values of @xmath79 in ( [ eq : gammainterpolate ] ) will yield the same set of numbers @xmath50 . however , we take the point of view that the right - hand side of ( [ eq : gammainterpolate ] ) furnishes an analytic function that interpolates the @xmath50 at the @xmath42 ; for different @xmath80 these are different interpolating functions which is a freedom that we will exploit to our advantage . in fact , we will only need to consider @xmath81 or @xmath82 . for @xmath10 given as above , the sse is a sequence of exact solutions of ( [ eq : nls ] ) such that the @xmath25th element @xmath83 of the sse ( i ) solves ( [ eq : nls ] ) with @xmath29 as given by ( [ eq : quantization ] ) and ( ii ) is defined as the @xmath25-soliton solution corresponding to the eigenvalues @xmath42 given by ( [ eq : bs ] ) and the auxiliary spectrum @xmath50 given by ( [ eq : gammainterpolate ] ) via the solution of riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : meromorphic ] with @xmath29 . for each @xmath25 , we restrict the sse to @xmath3 to obtain functions @xmath84 it is this sequence of functions that is the subject of theorem [ theorem : mainresult ] . in the following sections we will set up a new framework for the asymptotic analysis of sses in the limit @xmath85 , a problem closely related to the computation of asymptotics of solutions of ( [ eq : nls ] ) for fixed initial data @xmath59 in the semiclassical limit . the asymptotic method we will now develop for studying riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : meromorphic ] for sses is especially well - adapted to studying the case of @xmath3 , where the method described in detail in @xcite fails . to illustrate the new method , we therefore set @xmath3 in the rest of this paper . also , we anticipate the utility of tying the value of the parameter @xmath86 to the remaining independent variable @xmath4 by setting @xmath87 in all subsequent formulae in which the index @xmath51 appears it should be assumed to be assigned a definite value according to ( [ eq : jdef ] ) . we now want to convert riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : meromorphic ] into a new riemann - hilbert problem for a sectionally holomorphic matrix so that the `` steepest - descent '' methods can be applied . as mentioned in the introduction , in @xcite this transformation can be accomplished by encircling the locus of accumulation of the poles , here the imaginary interval @xmath64 , with a loop contour in the upper half - plane and making a specific change of variables based on the interpolation formula ( [ eq : gammainterpolate ] ) for some value of @xmath80 in the interior of the region enclosed by the loop and also in the complex - conjugate region . one then tries to choose the position of the loop contour in the complex plane that is best adapted to asymptotic analysis of the resulting holomorphic riemann - hilbert problem . the trouble with this approach is that it turns out that for @xmath3 the `` correct '' placement of the contour requires that part of it should lie on a subset of the imaginary interval @xmath64 , that is , right on top of the accumulating poles ! for such a choice of the loop contour , the boundary values taken by the transformed matrix on the outside of the loop would be singular and the `` steepest descent '' theory would not apply . so taking the point of view that making any particular choice of @xmath80 in ( [ eq : gammainterpolate ] ) leads to problems , we propose to simultaneously make use of _ two distinct values of @xmath79 _ in passing to a riemann - hilbert problem for a sectionally holomorphic matrix . consider the contours illustrated in figure [ fig : twohalves ] , arranged such that @xmath88 . for @xmath89 , set @xmath90\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , . \label{eq : lefttransform}\ ] ] for @xmath91 , set @xmath92\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , . \label{eq : righttransform}\ ] ] for @xmath93 set @xmath94 , and for all other complex @xmath22 set @xmath95 . so rather than enclosing the poles in a loop and making a single change of variables inside , we are splitting the region inside the loop in half , and we are using different interpolants ( [ eq : gammainterpolate ] ) of the @xmath50 at the @xmath42 in each half of the loop . some of the properties of the transformed matrix @xmath96 are the following . the matrix @xmath96 is analytic in @xmath97 where @xmath98 is the union of the contours @xmath99 , @xmath100 , and @xmath101 , and their complex conjugates . moreover , @xmath96 takes continuous boundary values on @xmath98 . [ prop : manalytic ] _ proof : _ the function @xmath102 is analytic in @xmath103 and @xmath104 if @xmath99 and @xmath100 are chosen close enough to the imaginary axis since @xmath61 is analytic there . by using the residue relation ( [ eq : residuerelation ] ) and the interpolation formula ( [ eq : gammainterpolate ] ) alternatively for @xmath81 and @xmath82 , one checks directly that the poles of @xmath41 are canceled by the explicit blaschke factors in ( [ eq : lefttransform ] ) and ( [ eq : righttransform ] ) . @xmath105 let @xmath106 denote the boundary values taken on the oriented contour @xmath98 , where the subscript `` @xmath107 '' ( respectively `` @xmath108 '' ) indicates the boundary value taken from the left ( respectively from the right ) . then for @xmath109 , @xmath110\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , . \label{eq : mjumpcl}\ ] ] for @xmath111 , @xmath112\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , . \label{eq : mjumpcr}\ ] ] for @xmath113 , @xmath114\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , . \label{eq : mjumpcm}\ ] ] on the contours in the lower half - plane the jump relations are determined by the symmetry @xmath115 . all jump matrices are analytic functions in the vicinity of their respective contours . [ prop : mjump ] _ proof : _ this is also a direct consequence of ( [ eq : lefttransform ] ) and ( [ eq : righttransform ] ) . the analyticity is clear on @xmath99 and @xmath100 since @xmath102 is analytic there , while on @xmath101 one observes that as a consequence of the bohr - sommerfeld quantization condition ( [ eq : bs ] ) , the cosine factor precisely cancels the poles on @xmath101 contributed by the product of blaschke factors . although we have specified the contour @xmath101 to coincide with a segment of the imaginary axis , the reader will see that the same statements concerning the analyticity of @xmath96 and the continuity of the boundary values on @xmath98 also hold when @xmath101 is taken to be absolutely any smooth contour in the upper half - plane connecting @xmath116 to @xmath117 . given a choice of @xmath101 , the contours @xmath99 and @xmath100 must be such that the topology of figure [ fig : twohalves ] is preserved . we also have specified that @xmath99 and @xmath100 should lie sufficiently close to @xmath101 ( a distance independent of @xmath118 ) so that @xmath102 is analytic in @xmath103 and @xmath104 . later we will also exploit the proximity of these two contours to @xmath101 to deduce decay properties of certain analytic functions on these contours from their oscillation properties on @xmath101 by the cauchy - riemann equations . taken together , proposition [ prop : manalytic ] and proposition [ prop : mjump ] indicate that the matrix @xmath119 satisfies a riemann - hilbert problem without poles , but instead having explicit homogeneous jump relations on @xmath98 given by the matrix functions on the right - hand sides of ( [ eq : mjumpcl ] ) , ( [ eq : mjumpcr ] ) , and ( [ eq : mjumpcm ] ) . the normalization of @xmath96 at infinity is the same as that of @xmath120 since no transformation has been made outside a compact set , so if @xmath96 can be recovered from its jump relations and normalization condition , then the sse itself can be obtained for @xmath3 from ( [ eq : potentialrecovery ] ) with @xmath41 replaced by @xmath96 . we now introduce a further change of dependent variable involving a scalar function that is meant to capture the dominant asymptotics for the problem . let @xmath121 be a complex - valued function that is independent of @xmath23 , analytic for @xmath122 taking continuous boundary values , satisfies @xmath123 , and @xmath124 . setting @xmath125 we find that for @xmath109 , @xmath126 \sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , , \label{eq : cljumpn}\ ] ] where @xmath127 similarly , for @xmath111 , we find @xmath128 \sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , , \label{eq : crjumpn}\ ] ] where @xmath129 finally , for @xmath113 , @xmath130 \sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , , \label{eq : cmjumpn}\ ] ] where @xmath131 and @xmath132 this means that given a function @xmath121 with the properties described above , one finds that the matrix @xmath133 satisfies another holomorphic riemann - hilbert problem with jump conditions determined from ( [ eq : cljumpn ] ) , ( [ eq : crjumpn ] ) , and ( [ eq : cmjumpn ] ) . because @xmath124 and @xmath121 is analytic near infinity , it follows that the correct normalization condition for @xmath133 is again that @xmath134 as @xmath135 . these same conditions on @xmath121 show that if @xmath133 can be found from its jump conditions and normalization condition , then the sse can be found via ( [ eq : potentialrecovery ] ) with @xmath120 replaced by @xmath133 . the function @xmath121 is called a _ complex phase function_. the advantage of introducing it into the problem is that by choosing it correctly , the jump matrices ( [ eq : cljumpn ] ) , ( [ eq : crjumpn ] ) , and ( [ eq : cmjumpn ] ) can be cast into a form that is especially convenient for analysis in the semiclassical limit of @xmath136 . the idea of introducing the complex phase function to assist in finding the leading - order asymptotics and controlling the error in this way first appeared in the paper @xcite as a modification of the `` steepest - descent '' method proposed in @xcite . for our purposes , we would like to have each element of the jump matrix for @xmath133 of the form @xmath137 for some appropriate function @xmath138 that is independent of @xmath118 . while this is not true strictly speaking , it becomes a good approximation in the limit @xmath136 with @xmath22 held fixed ( the approximation is not uniform near @xmath116 or @xmath117 ) . in this section , we describe the pointwise asymptotics of the jump matrix for @xmath133 with the aim of writing all nonzero matrix elements asymptotically in the form @xmath137 with a small relative error whose magnitude we can estimate . roughly speaking , the intuition is that the product over @xmath139 of blaschke factors should be replaced with an exponential of a sum over @xmath139 of logarithms . the latter sum goes over to an integral that scales like @xmath140 in the semiclassical limit . on the contour @xmath101 , the cosine that cancels the poles must also be encorporated into the asymptotics . the branch of the logarithm that is convenient to use here is most conveniently viewed as a function of two complex variables : @xmath141 as a function of @xmath22 for fixed @xmath63 , it is a logarithm that is cut downwards in the negative imaginary direction from the logarithmic pole at @xmath142 . equivalently , @xmath143 can be viewed as the branch of the multivalued function @xmath144 for which @xmath145 . suppose @xmath146 . the boundary value of @xmath147 taken on @xmath101 as @xmath22 approaches from the left ( respectively right ) side is denoted by @xmath148 ( respectively @xmath149 ) . the average of these two boundary values is denoted by @xmath150 . all the results we need will come from studying the asymptotic behavior of two quotients : @xmath151 and @xmath152 the function @xmath153 is analytic and nonvanishing for @xmath154 . let us denote by @xmath155 the domain of analyticity of @xmath156 restricted to the upper half - plane , so that by our assumptions on @xmath10 , @xmath157 . then , due to the zeros of the cosine on the imaginary axis , which match the poles of the product below @xmath117 and are not cancelled above @xmath117 , @xmath158 is analytic and nonvanishing for @xmath159 , where @xmath160 is the vertical ray from @xmath117 to infinity along the positive imaginary axis . the domain of analyticity for @xmath158 is a subset of @xmath161 rather than of the whole upper half - plane due to the presence of the averages of the logarithms in the integrand of ( [ eq : t ] ) . whereas these are boundary values defined _ a priori _ only on @xmath101 , the integrals extend from @xmath101 to analytic functions in the domain @xmath162 via the introduction of the function @xmath102 ( _ cf . _ equation ( [ eq : logjump ] ) ) . for all @xmath22 in the upper half - plane with latexmath:[$\hbar_n\le sufficiently small , but fixed as @xmath136 , @xmath164 [ lemma : souter ] _ proof : _ let us define the function @xmath165 by @xmath166 this analytic function takes the imaginary interval @xmath167 $ ] to the real interval @xmath168 $ ] where @xmath169 since @xmath170 does not vanish on @xmath101 , we have the inverse function @xmath171 defined for @xmath172 near the real interval @xmath168 $ ] . using these tools , we get the following representation for @xmath153 : @xmath173 and @xmath174\,dm - \left[l^0_{-e(m_k)}(\lambda)-l^0_{e(m_k)}(\lambda)\right]\,,\ ] ] with @xmath175 . expanding the logarithms , we find that @xmath176\ , . \label{eq : integralformula}\ ] ] this quantity is clearly @xmath177 for @xmath22 fixed away from @xmath101 . now , when @xmath178 as @xmath179 , we can estimate the denominator in the integrand to obtain two different bounds : @xmath180 and @xmath181 the idea is to use the estimate ( [ eq : lambdadenominator ] ) when @xmath182 is close to @xmath183 and to use the estimate ( [ eq : xidenominator ] ) for the remaining terms . suppose first @xmath184 is bounded between @xmath185 and @xmath186 , _ i.e. _ there are small fixed positive numbers @xmath187 and @xmath188 so that @xmath189 , and let @xmath190 be a small positive scale tied to @xmath23 and satisfying @xmath191 , and let @xmath192 be chosen from @xmath193 so that @xmath194 is as close as possible to @xmath195 , and likewise let @xmath196 be chosen from @xmath193 so that @xmath197 is as close as possible to @xmath198 . using ( [ eq : lambdadenominator ] ) we then find that @xmath199 because the sum contains @xmath200 terms and the volume of the region of integration for each term is @xmath201 , and we must take into account the overall factor of @xmath202 . now in each of the remaining terms @xmath203 , we have @xmath204 so using ( [ eq : xidenominator ] ) and summing over @xmath139 we get both @xmath205 the total estimate of @xmath206 is then optimized by a dominant balance among the three partial sums . this balance requires taking @xmath207 , upon which we deduce that under our assumptions on @xmath22 , we indeed have @xmath208 when @xmath184 is bounded between @xmath185 and @xmath186 . when @xmath209 or @xmath210 , the estimate ( [ eq : lambdadenominator ] ) should be used only for those terms that correspond to @xmath172 near zero or @xmath172 near @xmath211 respectively . in both of these exceptional cases , the same estimate is found . when @xmath184 is bounded below by @xmath186 , there is no need to use the estimate ( [ eq : lambdadenominator ] ) at all , and the relative error is of order @xmath118 uniformly in @xmath212 . this completes the proof . we now use this information about @xmath153 to effectively replace the sums of logarithms by integrals , at least on some portions of the contour @xmath98 . suppose that the contour @xmath99 is independent of @xmath118 and that for some sufficiently small positive number @xmath213 , @xmath99 lies in the strip @xmath214 and meets the imaginary axis only at its endpoints and does so transversely . then @xmath215 as @xmath118 goes to zero through positive values , for all @xmath216 with @xmath217 and @xmath218 . [ proposition : clout ] suppose that the contour @xmath100 is independent of @xmath118 and that for some sufficiently small positive number @xmath213 , @xmath100 lies in the strip @xmath219 and meets the imaginary axis only at its endpoints and does so transversely . then @xmath220 as @xmath118 goes to zero through positive values , for all @xmath221 with @xmath217 and @xmath218 . [ proposition : crout ] _ proof of propositions [ proposition : clout ] and [ proposition : crout ] : _ these propositions follow directly from lemma [ lemma : souter ] upon using the transversality of the intersections with the imaginary axis to replace @xmath222 by @xmath223 . @xmath105 we notice that the first factor on the second line in ( [ eq : lasymp ] ) and the first factor on the second line in ( [ eq : rasymp ] ) are both exponentially small as @xmath118 goes to zero through positive values , as a consequence of the fact that @xmath224 is an analytic negative real measure on @xmath101 . this follows from the cauchy - riemann equations and the geometry of figure [ fig : twohalves ] . it will be a very useful fact for us shortly . now we turn our attention to the function @xmath158 . the result analogous to lemma [ lemma : souter ] is the following . for all @xmath22 in the upper half - plane with latexmath:[$\hbar_n\le sufficiently small , but fixed as @xmath136 , @xmath225 [ lemma : touter ] _ proof : _ we begin with the jump condition @xmath226 relating the boundary values of the logarithm @xmath143 on the imaginary axis . using this jump relation and the definition of @xmath150 as the average of the boundary values of @xmath227 and @xmath228 , we see that for @xmath229 , we have @xmath230 while for @xmath231 , we have @xmath232 now , using the fact that @xmath61 is an analytic function satisfying @xmath233 for @xmath234 , we see by the cauchy - riemann equations that in both cases , the exponential relative error term is of the order @xmath235 for some @xmath236 . since this is negligible compared with the relative error associated with the asymptotic approximation of @xmath153 given in lemma [ lemma : souter ] , the proof is complete . @xmath105 unfortunately , we need asymptotic information about @xmath158 right on the imaginary axis , which contains the contour @xmath101 , so we need to improve upon lemma [ lemma : touter ] . we begin to extract this additional information by noting that under some circumstances , it is easy to show that @xmath158 remains bounded in the vicinity of the imaginary axis . if either ( i ) @xmath22 is real or ( ii ) @xmath237 and @xmath238 , and if for some @xmath239 sufficiently small @xmath240 , then @xmath158 is uniformly bounded as @xmath136 . [ lemma : tbounded ] _ proof : _ it suffices to show that @xmath153 is bounded under the same assumptions , because from ( [ eq : tleft ] ) and ( [ eq : tright ] ) and the cauchy - riemann equations , we see easily that @xmath241 . using the function @xmath242 and its inverse @xmath243 , we have the following @xmath244 where @xmath245 when @xmath246 , we see immediately that @xmath247 , and therefore @xmath248 and hence @xmath249 . now consider @xmath250 with @xmath251 sufficiently small independent of @xmath118 . the idea is that of the terms on the right - hand side of ( [ eq : difference ] ) , the discrete sum is a riemann sum approximation to the integral . the riemann sum is constructed using the midpoints of @xmath25 equal subintervals as sample points . if @xmath252 is bounded uniformly , then this sort of riemann sum provides an approximation to the integral that is of order @xmath253 or equivalently @xmath254 . in this case , we deduce that @xmath255 and in particular this is bounded as @xmath118 tends to zero . but as @xmath22 approaches the imaginary axis , the accuracy of the approximation is lost . for @xmath250 , the function @xmath256 satisfies @xmath257 and takes its maximum when @xmath258 , with a maximum value @xmath259 therefore , as @xmath251 tends to zero , @xmath256 becomes unbounded , growing logarithmically in @xmath251 . as a consequence of this blowup the approximation of the integral by the riemann sum based on midpoints for @xmath237 fails to be second - order accurate uniformly in @xmath251 . however , because the maximum of @xmath256 always occurs at the right endpoint , it is easy to see that when the error becomes larger than @xmath177 in magnitude its sign is such that the riemann sum is always an _ underestimate _ of the value of the integral , and consequently the right - hand side of ( [ eq : difference ] ) is negative . this is concretely illustrated in figure [ fig : riemannsums ] where we have taken the example of the gaussian function @xmath260 in order to supply the function @xmath61 and therefore the function @xmath261 needed to build @xmath256 . in this case , @xmath262 and @xmath263 . the error of the riemann sum is worst when @xmath264 . in this case it is easy to see that the discrepancy contributed by only the subinterval adjacent to the logarithmic singularity of @xmath256 is @xmath265 , which clearly dominates the @xmath177 error contributed by the majority of the subintervals bounded away from @xmath258 . consequently , for those @xmath22 on the circle @xmath237 for which @xmath266 is not asymptotically small in @xmath118 , it is negative , and therefore @xmath153 is uniformly bounded for @xmath237 , as is @xmath158 . @xmath105 using this information , we can finally extract enough information about @xmath158 on the imaginary axis to approximate @xmath267 for @xmath113 . let @xmath101 be a fixed contour from @xmath116 to @xmath117 lying between @xmath99 and @xmath100 , possibly coinciding with the imaginary axis . then , for @xmath268 arbitrarily small , @xmath269 as @xmath118 goes to zero through positive values , for all @xmath113 with @xmath217 and @xmath218 . [ prop : a_m ] _ proof : _ let @xmath270 be the closed contour illustrated in figure [ fig : c ] . this counter - clockwise oriented contour consists of two vertical segments , one horizontal segment that lies on the real axis , and an arc of the circle of radius @xmath186 centered at the origin . the function @xmath158 is analytic on the interior of @xmath270 and is continuous on @xmath270 itself . in fact it is analytic on most of the boundary , failing to be analytic only at @xmath116 and @xmath117 . therefore for any @xmath22 in the interior , we may write @xmath271 if we let @xmath272 denote the part of @xmath270 with @xmath273 , and let @xmath274 denote the remaining portion of @xmath270 , then we get @xmath275 using the estimate guaranteed by lemma [ lemma : touter ] in the integral over @xmath274 , and the uniform boundedness of @xmath276 ( and therefore of @xmath277 ) guaranteed by lemma [ lemma : tbounded ] in the integral over @xmath272 , we find @xmath278 for some positive constants @xmath279 and @xmath280 . replacing the logarithm by a slightly cruder estimate of @xmath281 for arbitrarily small positive @xmath282 completes the proof . we have therefore succeeded in showing that , at least away from the self - intersection points of the contour @xmath98 , the jump matrices for @xmath133 as defined by ( [ eq : cljumpn ] ) for @xmath216 , ( [ eq : crjumpn ] ) for @xmath111 , and ( [ eq : cmjumpn ] ) for @xmath113 are well - approximated in the semiclassical limit @xmath136 by matrices in which all nonzero matrix elements are of the form @xmath137 with @xmath138 being independent of @xmath118 . the fact that this approximation is valid even when the `` active '' contour @xmath101 is taken to be right on top of the poles of the meromorphic riemann - hilbert problem for @xmath120 is an advantage over the approach taken in @xcite . using these approximations , we can introduce an _ ad hoc _ approximation of the matrix @xmath133 . first , define @xmath283 and for @xmath109 or @xmath100 , define @xmath284 then we pose the following problem . given a complex phase function @xmath121 find a matrix @xmath285 satisfying : 1 . * analyticity : * @xmath286 is analytic for @xmath287 . * boundary behavior : * @xmath286 assumes continuous boundary values on @xmath98 . 3 . * jump conditions : * the boundary values taken on @xmath98 satisfy @xmath288\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ ] ] for @xmath109 , @xmath289\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ ] ] for @xmath111 , and @xmath290\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2 } } \label{eq : ntildemiddle}\ ] ] for @xmath113 . for all other @xmath291 ( that is , in the lower half - plane ) , the jump is determined by the symmetry @xmath292 . * normalization : * @xmath286 is normalized at infinity : @xmath293 let @xmath294 be defined by the equation @xmath295 , the fact that @xmath294 is an analytic function for @xmath22 away from the imaginary interval @xmath296 $ ] , and the normalization that for large @xmath22 , @xmath297 . for @xmath298 , let @xmath299 it is easy to check directly that for all @xmath298 , we have @xmath300 . also , using the fact that @xmath301 is purely imaginary on the imaginary axis , and that @xmath302 is purely imaginary in the domain of integration , where it satisfies @xmath303 , we see that @xmath304 furthermore , it follows easily from ( [ eq : rhodefine ] ) that for all @xmath298 , we have @xmath305 with the lower constraint being achieved only at the endpoint being extended to all of @xmath101 by setting @xmath306 for @xmath22 above the endpoint @xmath307 . in this case one views the lower constraint as being active on the whole imaginary interval @xmath308 $ ] . ] of @xmath309 , @xmath310 , and the upper constraint being achieved only at the origin in accordance with ( [ eq : rhosequal ] ) . now , set @xmath311 this function satisfies all of the basic criteria set out earlier : it is analytic in @xmath312 and takes continuous boundary values , it satisfies @xmath123 , and it satisfies @xmath124 because @xmath313 note that @xmath121 is analytic across @xmath101 for @xmath22 above @xmath307 . consequently @xmath314 for all such @xmath22 . for @xmath113 below @xmath307 , @xmath315 becomes ( _ cf . _ equation ( [ eq : defthetaoriginal ] ) ) @xmath316 we now describe a number of important consequences of our choice of @xmath121 . for all @xmath317 $ ] , @xmath318 . [ prop : phitildezero ] to prove the proposition , we first point out that @xmath319 simply as a consequence of the fact that both @xmath61 and @xmath320 are purely imaginary on @xmath101 . next we point out that @xmath321 whenever @xmath322 $ ] . this follows from a direct calculation in which all integrals are evaluated by residues and the formula ( [ eq : rho0 ] ) is used . next we consider @xmath323 for @xmath324 $ ] , that is , above the endpoint of the support . clearly , @xmath325 is the boundary value on @xmath101 of an analytic function defined near @xmath101 in @xmath103 . since the boundary value taken below the endpoint is @xmath326 because @xmath327 there , and the boundary value taken above the endpoint is @xmath323 because @xmath328 there , we obtain the formula @xmath329 valid for @xmath113 above @xmath307 , where by @xmath330 for @xmath63 in the imaginary interval @xmath331 we mean the function @xmath320 defined by ( [ eq : rhodefine ] ) for @xmath63 in the imaginary interval @xmath332 , analytically continued from @xmath332 in the clockwise direction about the endpoint @xmath310 . in particular for such @xmath22 we have @xmath333 carrying out the analytic continuation , we find from ( [ eq : rhodefine ] ) that for @xmath334 , @xmath335 from this formula we see easily that for all @xmath22 strictly above the endpoint @xmath307 , @xmath336 is positive real . consequently , from ( [ eq : phiprime ] ) and since @xmath318 for @xmath310 , we get the following result . the function @xmath323 is negative real and decreasing in the positive imaginary direction for @xmath337 $ ] . [ prop : tildephineg ] now we consider the behavior of the function @xmath338 on @xmath99 and @xmath100 . from the definitions of the functions @xmath338 and @xmath323 , we see that for @xmath109 , @xmath339 and for @xmath111 , @xmath340 that is , the analytic function @xmath338 takes boundary values from the left on @xmath101 equal to @xmath341 and from the right on @xmath101 equal to @xmath342 . first consider the situation to the left or right of the imaginary interval @xmath343 $ ] . since @xmath327 in @xmath343 $ ] , the function @xmath338 on @xmath99 will be the analytic continuation of @xmath344 from @xmath101 and the function @xmath338 on @xmath100 will be the analytic continuation of @xmath345 from @xmath101 . from ( [ eq : upperlowerconstraints ] ) we see that for @xmath346 $ ] one has @xmath347 . therefore , it follows from the cauchy - riemann equations that for @xmath22 in portions of @xmath99 and @xmath100 close enough ( independently of @xmath118 ) to the interval @xmath343 $ ] one has @xmath348 for @xmath22 on _ both _ @xmath99 and @xmath100 . furthermore , it follows from the fact that @xmath233 that @xmath349 for @xmath109 and @xmath350 for @xmath111 . therefore @xmath351 for @xmath109 near the portion of @xmath101 below @xmath307 , and @xmath352 for @xmath22 in the analogous portion of @xmath100 . next consider the situation to the left or right of the portion of @xmath101 lying above the endpoint @xmath310 . since @xmath328 and @xmath353 for @xmath354 $ ] we see that for @xmath99 and @xmath100 close enough ( again independently of @xmath118 ) to this part of @xmath101 we again find that we have ( [ eq : decayleft ] ) on @xmath99 and ( [ eq : decayright ] ) on @xmath100 . this shows that the jump matrix on both contours @xmath99 and @xmath100 is an exponentially small perturbation of the identity for small positive @xmath118 , pointwise in @xmath22 bounded away from the origin and @xmath72 . for @xmath355 $ ] , the jump matrix for @xmath286 factors ( recall @xmath327 here ) : @xmath356 = \left[\begin{array}{cc } 1 & \displaystyle -i\exp\,\left(\frac{i\theta(\lambda)}{\hbar_n}\right)\\\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right ] \left[\begin{array}{cc } 0 & i\\\\i&0\end{array}\right ] \left[\begin{array}{cc } 1 & \displaystyle -i\exp\,\left(-\frac{i\theta(\lambda)}{\hbar_n}\right)\\\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right]\ , . \label{eq : factorization}\ ] ] let @xmath357 and @xmath358 be two boundaries of a lens surrounding @xmath167 $ ] . see figure [ fig : twohalveslens ] . using the factorization ( [ eq : factorization ] ) , we new define a new matrix function @xmath359 . in the region between @xmath357 and @xmath101 set @xmath360\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , . \label{eq : onleft}\ ] ] in the region between @xmath101 and @xmath358 , set @xmath361\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , . \label{eq : onright}\ ] ] elsewhere in the upper half - plane set @xmath362 . and in the lower half - plane define @xmath359 by symmetry : @xmath363 . these transformations imply jump conditions satisfied by @xmath364 on the contours in figure [ fig : twohalveslens ] since the jump conditions for @xmath286 are given . for @xmath365 we have @xmath366\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ ] ] which is an exponentially small perturbation of the identity except near the endpoints . and for @xmath367 we have @xmath368\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ ] ] which is also a jump that is exponentially close to the identity . for @xmath355 $ ] we get @xmath369\ ] ] as a consequence of the factorization ( [ eq : factorization ] ) . since @xmath370 for all @xmath22 in the upper half - plane outside the lens bounded by @xmath357 and @xmath358 , we see that @xmath359 satisfies the following jump condition on @xmath99 : @xmath371\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ ] ] the following jump relation on @xmath100 : @xmath372\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,,\ ] ] and the following jump relation on the imaginary interval @xmath308\subset c_m$ ] : @xmath373 \sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,.\ ] ] all three of these matrices are exponentially close to the identity matrix pointwise in @xmath22 for interior points of their respective contours . the matrix @xmath359 is related to @xmath286 by explicit transformations . however , taking the pointwise limit of the jump matrix for @xmath359 leads us to the following _ ad hoc _ model problem . find a matrix @xmath374 satisfying : 1 . * analyticity : * @xmath374 is analytic for @xmath375 , where @xmath309 is the imaginary interval @xmath376 $ ] . * boundary behavior : * @xmath374 assumes boundary values that are continuous except at @xmath377 , where at worst inverse fourth - root singularities are admitted . 3 . * jump condition : * for @xmath378 , @xmath379\,.\ ] ] 4 . * normalization : * @xmath374 is normalized at infinity : @xmath380 this model problem is easily solved explicitly . the unique solution of this riemann - hilbert problem is @xmath381\ , , \label{eq : otildesolution}\ ] ] where @xmath382 and @xmath383 with both functions @xmath294 and @xmath384 being analytic in @xmath385 , normalized according to @xmath386 and @xmath387 as @xmath135 . using this matrix , we define an `` outer '' model for the matrix @xmath388 as follows . the idea is to recall the relationship between the matrix @xmath286 and @xmath359 , and simply substitute @xmath374 for @xmath359 in these formulae . for @xmath22 in between @xmath357 and @xmath101 , we use ( [ eq : onleft ] ) to set @xmath389\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,.\ ] ] for @xmath22 in between @xmath101 and @xmath358 , we use ( [ eq : onright ] ) to set @xmath390\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,.\ ] ] for all other @xmath22 in the upper half - plane , set @xmath391 , and in the lower half - plane set @xmath392 . the important properties of this matrix are the following . the matrix @xmath393 is analytic for all complex @xmath22 except at the contours @xmath357 , @xmath358 , the imaginary interval @xmath343 $ ] , and their complex - conjugates . it satisfies the following jump conditions : @xmath394\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , , \hspace{0.2 in}\mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in } \lambda\in l_l\,,\ ] ] @xmath395\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , , \hspace{0.2 in}\mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in } \lambda\in l_r\,,\ ] ] @xmath396 \sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,,\hspace{0.2 in } \mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in}\lambda\in [ 0,ia(x)]\,,\ ] ] with the jump matrices on the conjugate contours in the lower half - plane being obtained from these by the symmetry @xmath397 . in particular , note that for @xmath355 $ ] , we have @xmath398 . also , if @xmath399 is any given open set containing the endpoint @xmath310 , then @xmath393 is uniformly bounded for @xmath400 with a bound that depends only on @xmath399 and not on @xmath118 . [ prop : noutproperties ] in justifying formally the local model @xmath401 , we ignored the fact that the pointwise asymptotics for the jump matrices for @xmath359 that we used to obtain the matrix @xmath374 were not uniform near the origin or near the moving endpoint @xmath310 . we also neglected the breakdown of the asymptotics for @xmath402 , @xmath403 , and @xmath267 near the points @xmath116 and @xmath117 . consequently , we do not expect the outer model @xmath401 to be a good approximation to @xmath133 near @xmath116 , @xmath310 , or @xmath117 . in this section , we examine the neighborhoods of these three points in more detail , and we will obtain accurate local models for @xmath133 in the corresponding neighborhoods . . let @xmath404 and @xmath405 be small scales tied to @xmath118 such that @xmath406 as @xmath179 . let @xmath407 be defined as the unique integer for which exactly @xmath408 of the numbers @xmath38 lie strictly below @xmath409 on the positive imaginary axis . we want to compute uniform asymptotics for @xmath153 defined by ( [ eq : s ] ) for @xmath410 , and for @xmath158 defined by ( [ eq : t ] ) for @xmath113 when @xmath411 . [ lemma : originpeelfirst ] when @xmath412 and @xmath411 and with @xmath407 defined as above , @xmath413 _ proof : _ we recall the integral formula ( _ cf . _ equation ( [ eq : integralformula ] ) ) @xmath414 in which we expand the integrand in partial fractions : @xmath415 since @xmath412 , for @xmath416 and @xmath417 , we get @xmath418 for such @xmath419 we therefore have @xmath420 so summing over @xmath139 gives @xmath421 because @xmath422 , which proves the lemma . so only the fraction of terms @xmath203 with @xmath423 contribute significantly to the sum for @xmath206 . it is easy to check directly that @xmath424 is an analytic function for @xmath411 whenever @xmath425 , so it makes no difference in these terms whether it is @xmath143 or @xmath150 that appears in the definition of @xmath426 . therefore , the terms in @xmath153 and @xmath158 that can be significant for @xmath22 near the origin are thus @xmath427 and @xmath428 here we have written the integrals in the exponent using the change of variables @xmath429 . so lemma [ lemma : originpeelfirst ] simply says that @xmath430 and @xmath431 uniformly for @xmath432 . when @xmath22 is close to the origin along with the points @xmath433 contributing to @xmath158 , the ladder of discrete nodes appears to become equally spaced . the next lemma shows that this is indeed the case . [ lemma : originpeelsecond ] let @xmath434 for @xmath435 be the sequence of numbers defined by the relation : @xmath436 which results from expanding the bohr - sommerfeld relation ( [ eq : bs ] ) for @xmath437 small , and keeping only the dominant terms . define @xmath438 and @xmath439 then , for @xmath412 and @xmath411 , @xmath440 where we suppose that the scale @xmath404 is further constrained so that the relative error is asymptotically small . if @xmath22 is additionally bounded outside of some sector containing the positive imaginary axis , then @xmath441 _ proof : _ we begin by observing that for @xmath442 , the distance between @xmath433 and @xmath443 is much smaller than the distance between @xmath433 and @xmath444 , as long as @xmath445 . more precisely , we have @xmath446 decompose the quotients as follows : @xmath447 where @xmath448 @xmath449 @xmath450 -[\overline{l}^0_{-e(m)}(\lambda)-\overline{l}^0_{-e'(0)m}(\lambda)]\right)\,dm \right)\ , , \label{eq : ellbar}\ ] ] and @xmath451 -[l^0_{-e(m)}(\lambda)-l^0_{-e'(0)m}(\lambda)]\right)\,dm \right)\ , . \label{eq : ell}\ ] ] first we deal with @xmath452 and @xmath453 . since @xmath261 is differentiable and @xmath172 is small we have @xmath454 . also , the interval of integration is @xmath455 in length . although the integrands in ( [ eq : ellbar ] ) and ( [ eq : ell ] ) are not pointwise small , upon integration it follows that @xmath456 uniformly for all @xmath22 in the upper half - plane satisfying @xmath411 . here we are assuming that @xmath445 . for the moment , let s drop the conditions @xmath412 and @xmath411 and instead consider @xmath22 to lie on the sides of the square centered at the origin , one of whose sides is parallel to the real axis and intersects the positive imaginary axis halfway between the points @xmath457 and @xmath458 . note that the estimate ( [ eq : twinning ] ) implies that the sides of the square intersect the real and imaginary axes a distance from the origin that is approximately @xmath404 . therefore the square asymptotically contains the closed disk @xmath411 because @xmath422 . we will show that for @xmath22 on the four sides of the square , both @xmath459 and @xmath460 are very close to one . we write @xmath459 in the form @xmath461 first consider the top of the square : for @xmath462 , we easily see that @xmath463 for @xmath442 . combining this with ( [ eq : twinning ] ) , we get @xmath464 summing these estimates over @xmath139 ( it is convenient to approximate sums by integrals in doing so ) , we find that @xmath465 consequently , for @xmath22 on the top of the square , @xmath466 an estimate of the same form holds when @xmath22 is on the bottom of the square , where @xmath467 . when @xmath22 is on the left or right side of the square , so that @xmath468 , both @xmath469 and @xmath470 are @xmath471 . by the same arguments as above , we then have for such @xmath22 that @xmath472 now we look at @xmath460 on the same square . generally , for such @xmath22 which are of order @xmath404 in magnitude , we have @xmath473 when @xmath22 is on the top or bottom of the square , we have @xmath474 and when @xmath22 is on the left or right sides of the square , the same quantity is exponentially small . it follows easily that for @xmath22 on any of the sides of the square , @xmath475 so uniformly on the four sides of the square , we have @xmath476 but the product @xmath477 is analytic within the square , so by the maximum principle it follows that the same estimate holds for all @xmath22 on the interior of the square , and in particular for all @xmath22 in the upper half - plane with @xmath411 . this shows that @xmath478 holds for all such @xmath22 . now to control the relationship between @xmath479 and @xmath480 we consider @xmath22 to lie outside of some symmetrical sector about the positive imaginary axis , of arbitrarily small nonzero opening angle @xmath481 independent of @xmath118 . since @xmath412 , we get @xmath482 summing these estimates over @xmath139 one finds that @xmath472 combining this with the estimate ( [ eq : elelbar ] ) of @xmath483 , we find that @xmath484 for all @xmath22 in the upper half - plane with @xmath432 and bounded outside of the sector of opening angle @xmath481 about the positive imaginary axis . this completes the proof . @xmath105 without any approximation , @xmath480 can be rewritten in the form : @xmath485 and @xmath486 can be rewritten in the form : @xmath487 where @xmath488 and we are introducing a transformation @xmath489 to a local variable @xmath490 given by @xmath491 these formulae come from evaluating the logarithmic integrals exactly , which is possible because @xmath261 has been replaced by the linear function @xmath492 , taking advantage of the equal spacing of the @xmath443 to write the product explicitly in terms of gamma functions , and then using the reflection identity for the gamma function to eliminate the cosine from @xmath486 . now , the integer @xmath493 is large , approximately of size @xmath494 . but for @xmath411 , @xmath493 is asymptotically large compared to @xmath490 because @xmath422 . these observations allow us to apply stirling - type asymptotics to @xmath480 and @xmath486 . [ lemma : originpeelthird ] in addition to all prior hypotheses , suppose that @xmath495 . then , @xmath496 and @xmath497 _ proof : _ asymptotically expanding the gamma functions for large @xmath493 , we find that @xmath498 and @xmath499 where @xmath500 next , expanding @xmath501 , one gets worse error terms : @xmath502 combining these estimates and noting that @xmath503 completes the proof of the lemma . @xmath105 with these results in hand , we can easily establish the following . let @xmath22 be in the upper half - plane , with @xmath504 , where @xmath505 , and let @xmath22 be bounded outside of some fixed symmetrical sector containing the positive imaginary axis . then @xmath506 where @xmath507 . [ prop : sinner ] _ proof : _ according to lemmas [ lemma : originpeelfirst ] , [ lemma : originpeelsecond ] , and [ lemma : originpeelthird ] , the total relative error is a sum of three terms : @xmath508 note that since @xmath509 , the order @xmath510 term is always dominated asymptotically by the order @xmath511 term . the error is optimized by picking @xmath404 so that the two possibly dominant terms are in balance . this forces us to choose @xmath512 . the proposition follows upon taking @xmath513 . @xmath105 let @xmath22 be in the upper half - plane , with @xmath504 , where @xmath505 . then for all @xmath35 , however small , @xmath514 where @xmath507 . [ prop : tinner ] _ proof : _ in this case , according to lemmas [ lemma : originpeelfirst ] , [ lemma : originpeelsecond ] , and [ lemma : originpeelthird ] , the total relative error is a sum of three different terms : @xmath515 again , since @xmath509 , the order @xmath510 term is always dominated asymptotically by the order @xmath511 term . for any @xmath516 , we have @xmath517 so we can eliminate the logarithm at the expense of a slightly larger error . taking @xmath518 as in the statement of the proposition , and using the cruder estimate ( [ eq : cruder ] ) , the nearly optimal value of @xmath404 to minimize the total relative error is achieved by a dominant balance between the right - hand side of ( [ eq : cruder ] ) and the term of order @xmath511 . the balance gives @xmath519 , with @xmath520 with this choice of @xmath404 , the total relative error is of the order @xmath521 , with @xmath522 with the inequality following because @xmath516 and @xmath523 . the inequality fails in the limit @xmath524 . therefore , for each arbitrarily small @xmath35 , we can find a @xmath516 sufficiently small that @xmath525 . this gives us a slightly less optimal estimate of the relative error : simply @xmath526 , which completes the proof . @xmath105 to repair the flaw in our model @xmath393 for the matrix @xmath133 related to the nonuniformity of the approximation of the jump matrices near the origin , we need to provide a different approximation of @xmath133 that will be valid when @xmath504 for some @xmath527 . the local failure of the approximation is gauged by the deviation of the matrix quotient @xmath528 from the identity matrix near the origin . it turns out to be more convenient to study a conjugated form of this matrix ( which also deviates from the identity for @xmath22 near the origin ) . namely , for @xmath504 , set @xmath529 if @xmath229 and @xmath530 if @xmath231 . it is easy to check that as a consequence of the boundary conditions satisfied by the matrix @xmath374 on the imaginary axis near the origin , the conjugating factors are analytic throughout the disk @xmath504 . for later convenience , let us assume without loss of generality that the auxiliary contours @xmath99 , @xmath100 , @xmath357 and @xmath358 are straight rays in some @xmath118-independent neighborhood of the origin . it is easy to write down the jump conditions satisfied by @xmath531 on these four rays and also on the positive imaginary axis . we find : @xmath532\,,\hspace{0.2 in } \mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in}\lambda\in c_l\,,\ ] ] @xmath533\,,\hspace{0.2 in } \mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in}\lambda\in c_r\,,\ ] ] @xmath534\ , , \hspace{0.2 in } \mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in}\lambda\in l_l\,,\ ] ] @xmath535\ , , \hspace{0.2 in } \mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in}\lambda\in l_r\,,\ ] ] and for @xmath113 , @xmath536 & -ie^{i(\theta(\lambda)-\theta(0))/\hbar_n } [ ia_m(\lambda)+e^{\tilde{\phi}(\lambda)/\hbar_n}]\\\\ -ie^{-i(\theta(\lambda)-\theta(0))/\hbar_n } [ ia_m(\lambda)+e^{\tilde{\phi}(\lambda)/\hbar_n } ] & 1-[ia_m(\lambda)+e^{\tilde{\phi}(\lambda)/\hbar_n}]\end{array}\right]\ , . \label{eq : fjumpcm}\ ] ] the jump relations satisfied by @xmath531 on the complex conjugate contours in the lower half - plane follow from these by the symmetry @xmath537 . now , for @xmath109 with @xmath504 , @xmath538 where in the last line @xmath539 with the change of coordinate being given by ( [ eq : varphi0 ] ) . in these steps , we used the relation ( [ eq : tauleft ] ) , the fact that from proposition [ prop : phitildezero ] we get @xmath327 , and , according to ( [ eq : deftheta0 ] ) and the quantization condition ( [ eq : quantization ] ) on @xmath118 , @xmath540 . we have also used the fact that @xmath541 which follows directly from the definition ( [ eq : deftheta0 ] ) of @xmath102 , the definition ( [ eq : deftheta ] ) of @xmath315 , and the relation ( [ eq : rhosequal ] ) . in a similar way , for @xmath111 with @xmath504 , we get @xmath542 and for @xmath543 with @xmath504 , @xmath544 with @xmath539 . finally , when @xmath113 and @xmath504 we have for arbitrarily small @xmath35 , @xmath545\\\\ & = & \displaystyle 1-t(\lambda)\\\\ & = & \displaystyle 1-\frac{2\pi e^{2i\zeta}(-i\zeta)^{-2i\zeta } } { \gamma(1/2-i\zeta)^2 } \left(1+o\left(\hbar_n^{4\alpha/3 - 1-\nu}\right)\right ) \\\\ & = & \displaystyle 1-\frac{2\pi e^{2i\zeta}(-i\zeta)^{-2i\zeta}}{\gamma(1/2-i\zeta)^2 } + o\left(\hbar_n^{4\alpha/3 - 1-\nu}\right)\ , , \end{array } \label{eq : ammodel}\ ] ] again with @xmath539 . the last step follows because @xmath546 is uniformly bounded on @xmath101 . let @xmath547 , @xmath548 , @xmath549 , @xmath550 , and @xmath551 denote the straight rays that agree with the corresponding contours in a fixed neighborhood of the origin in the @xmath22-plane , but lying in the @xmath490-plane ( according to ( [ eq : varphi0 ] ) , @xmath490 is a simple rescaling of @xmath22 by a positive number ) . these rays are oriented contours , with the same orientation as the original contours : @xmath551 , @xmath549 , and @xmath550 are oriented outwards from the origin toward infinity , and @xmath547 and @xmath548 are oriented inwards from infinity toward the origin . let the union of these contours with their complex conjugates be denoted @xmath552 . consider the following riemann - hilbert problem . find a matrix @xmath553 with the following properties : 1 . * analyticity : * @xmath553 is analytic for @xmath554 . * boundary behavior : * @xmath553 assumes continuous boundary values on @xmath552 . 3 . * jump conditions : * the boundary values taken on @xmath552 satisfy @xmath555\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\zeta\in \vec{c_l}\,,\ ] ] @xmath556\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\zeta\in \vec{c_r}\,,\ ] ] @xmath557\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\zeta\in \vec{l_l}\,,\ ] ] @xmath558\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\zeta\in \vec{l_r}\,,\ ] ] and @xmath559 \\\\ \displaystyle ie^{\pi\zeta } \left[\frac{2\pi e^{2i\zeta}(-i\zeta)^{-2i\zeta } } { \gamma(1/2-i\zeta)^2}-1\right ] & \displaystyle \frac{2\pi e^{2i\zeta}(-i\zeta)^{-2i\zeta}}{\gamma(1/2-i\zeta)^2 } \end{array}\right]\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\zeta\in \vec{c_m}\ , . \label{eq : fhatjumpcm}\ ] ] on the contours in the lower half - plane , the jump conditions are implied by the symmetry @xmath560 . * normalization : * @xmath553 is normalized at infinity : @xmath561 [ rhp : localorigin ] unfortunately , we can not solve riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : localorigin ] explicitly . luckily , we will not require an explicit solution . however , existence of a solution is an issue that must be resolved , and we need to obtain a decay estimate that quantifies the normalization condition ( [ eq : fhatnorm ] ) . these questions are addressed via the abstract theory of riemann - hilbert problems . the local model riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : localorigin ] has a unique solution satisfying @xmath562 as @xmath563 , uniformly with respect to direction . also , @xmath564 . _ proof : _ each riemann - hilbert problem is equivalent to an inhomogeneous system of linear singular integral equations . it must be shown that the matrix singular integral operator associated with these equations is of fredholm type , with index zero . then it must be shown that there are no homogeneous solutions , at which point one has existence and uniqueness of a solution to the inhomogeneous system . finally , one maps the solution of the integral equations to the unique solution of the riemann - hilbert problem and it remains to verify the rate of decay to the identity matrix as @xmath563 . the theory we will use is the theory of matrix riemann - hilbert problems on self - intersecting contours , with boundary values taken in spaces of hlder continuous functions . this theory is summarized in a self - contained way in the appendix of @xcite . the first step is to establish that the operator of the associated system of singular integral equations is fredholm index zero on an appropriate space of functions . as described in @xcite , this follows from two facts . first , on each ray of the contour @xmath552 the jump matrix @xmath565 is uniformly lipschitz with respect to @xmath490 , and differs from the identity by a quantity that is @xmath566 for large @xmath490 . second , the limiting values of the jump matrix , taken as @xmath567 along each ray of @xmath552 , are consistent with a bounded solution @xmath568 near @xmath569 . this means the following . suppose that @xmath553 has a limiting value , say a matrix @xmath570 , as @xmath567 inside one of the sectors of @xmath571 . using the limiting value of the jump matrix @xmath572 at the origin along one of the rays of @xmath552 bounding that sector , one can compute the limiting value of @xmath553 at the origin in the neighboring sector . this procedure can be continued , moving from sector to sector of @xmath571 in the same direction , until one arrives once again in the original sector , with a matrix @xmath573 . the consistency condition is simply that @xmath574 , which upon elimination of @xmath575 can be viewed as a cyclic relation among the limiting values of the jump matrix @xmath576 taken along each ray of @xmath552 as @xmath567 . it is easily checked that this cyclic relation indeed holds for riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : localorigin ] . the second step is to establish existence and uniqueness of the solution @xmath553 . the fact that the associated singular integral equations are fredholm index zero means that , in a certain precise sense , the fredholm alternative applies to our riemann - hilbert problem . the inhomogeneity is the normalization to the identity matrix at @xmath577 . the corresponding homogeneous riemann - hilbert problem has exactly the same form except that the normalization condition is replaced by the condition @xmath578 as @xmath563 . we will have a unique solution of riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : localorigin ] if it can be shown that no such homogeneous solutions exist . for this purpose , it is sufficient that the jump matrix @xmath572 should have a certain symmetry with respect to schwartz reflection through the real axis in the @xmath490-plane . for the orientation of @xmath552 described above , the required relation is : @xmath579 for @xmath580 . it is easily checked , using the symmetry @xmath581 and structural details of @xmath582 in the upper half - plane , that this relation holds , and this means that riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : localorigin ] has a unique solution @xmath553 . the third step is to establish that the unique solution @xmath568 decays to the identity for large @xmath490 like @xmath583 . the hlder theory that we have been using generally provides a solution @xmath553 under these circumstances that takes boundary values on @xmath552 that are hlder continuous with exponent @xmath282 and that differs from the identity matrix by @xmath584 as @xmath585 , for all @xmath282 strictly less than 1 . this fact can be traced to the compact embedding of each hlder space into all hlder spaces with strictly smaller exponents . the compactness is needed to establish the fredholm property of the riemann - hilbert problem . so to obtain the required decay , we need an additional argument . the condition that is required to obtain the @xmath566 decay is that a signed sum of the mean values of @xmath586 taken as @xmath563 along each ray of @xmath552 ( the signs are related to the orientation of the individual rays ) is zero @xcite . now along each ray of @xmath552 except for @xmath551 and its conjugate ( _ i.e. _ the imaginary axis in the @xmath490-plane ) , @xmath572 decays to the identity exponentially fast as @xmath563 . so these rays to do not contribute to the sum and it is only necessary to check the imaginary axis . when @xmath587 , @xmath588+o\left(\frac{1}{\zeta}\right)\,,\ ] ] as @xmath563 , and for @xmath490 on the negative imaginary axis oriented upwards , @xmath589+o\left(\frac{1}{\zeta}\right)\,,\ ] ] as @xmath563 . the limits of these quantities do not exist as @xmath563 due to the oscillations on the off - diagonal . but the mean values exist and are equal , and it turns out that they enter the sum with opposite signs due to the orientation of the contour rays . thus , the required sum of signed mean values indeed vanishes . this , along with the analyticity of the jump matrix @xmath572 along each ray of @xmath552 establishes that @xmath590 as @xmath563 . finally , we check that @xmath591 . taking determinants in the jump relations we see that on all rays of the contour , @xmath592 . since the boundary values taken by @xmath553 on @xmath552 are continuous , we discover that @xmath593 is an entire function . since this function tends to one at infinity , it follows from liouville s theorem that @xmath594 . this completes the proof of the proposition . @xmath105 from ( [ eq : fdefleft ] ) and ( [ eq : fdefright ] ) we can express @xmath388 in terms of @xmath531 for @xmath504 . for @xmath229 we have @xmath595 and for @xmath231 we have @xmath596 to obtain a local model for @xmath133 near the origin , we simply replace @xmath531 in these formulae by the approximation @xmath597 . with @xmath504 , we set for @xmath229 , @xmath598 and for @xmath231 we set @xmath599 the most important properties of this matrix function are easily seen to be the following . the matrix @xmath600 is a piecewise analytic function of @xmath22 in the disk @xmath601 , with jumps only on the locally straight - line contours @xmath99 , @xmath100 , @xmath357 , @xmath358 , and @xmath101 , and their conjugates in the lower half - disk . the jump relations satisfied by @xmath600 on these contours are the following : @xmath602 \sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\lambda\in c_l\,,\ ] ] @xmath603 \sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\lambda\in c_r\,,\ ] ] @xmath604\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , , \hspace{0.2 in } \lambda\in l_l\,,\ ] ] @xmath605\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , , \hspace{0.2 in } \lambda\in l_r\,,\ ] ] @xmath606 where @xmath607 with @xmath608 and where @xmath539 . the jumps on the corresponding contours in the lower half - plane are obtained from the symmetry @xmath609 . the matrix @xmath600 is uniformly bounded for @xmath601 , with a bound that is independent of @xmath118 . also , @xmath610 and when @xmath611 , @xmath612 [ prop : originmodelproperties ] as before , we suppose that @xmath404 and @xmath405 are small scales satisfying @xmath613 as @xmath118 tends to zero . we redefine the integer @xmath407 so that exactly the first @xmath407 of the numbers @xmath38 lie on the positive imaginary axis above @xmath614 . we will suppose that @xmath615 , and @xmath616 and we will deduce asymptotic formulae for @xmath158 given by ( [ eq : t ] ) valid for such @xmath22 , and for @xmath153 given by ( [ eq : s ] ) when @xmath22 is also bounded outside of some downward - opening sector with vertex at @xmath72 , in the semiclassical limit @xmath617 . first , we establish a result that is the analogue of lemma [ lemma : originpeelfirst ] . [ lemma : iapeelfirst ] when @xmath615 and @xmath616 and with @xmath407 defined as above , @xmath618 _ proof : _ we again estimate @xmath203 using the integral formula ( [ eq : integralformulag ] ) with integrand @xmath619 given by ( [ eq : glambdaxi ] ) . given our conditions on @xmath22 , for @xmath416 and @xmath423 we have @xmath620 for all such @xmath419 we therefore have the estimate @xmath621 summing over @xmath139 gives @xmath622 which is @xmath623 because @xmath422 , and the lemma is proved . @xmath105 as was the case when @xmath22 was near the origin , only certain terms are important when @xmath624 is small , as a direct consequence of lemma [ lemma : iapeelfirst ] and the fact that @xmath424 is analytic for such @xmath22 when @xmath423 . the important terms when @xmath616 are @xmath625 and @xmath626 lemma [ lemma : iapeelfirst ] states that @xmath627 and @xmath628 as @xmath136 for @xmath616 . the analogue of lemma [ lemma : originpeelsecond ] says that for @xmath624 small the sequence of numbers @xmath629 contributing to @xmath153 and @xmath158 can be replaced essentially by a `` straightened - out '' sequence with uniform density . [ lemma : iapeelsecond ] let @xmath443 for @xmath630 be the sequence of numbers defined by the relation : @xmath631 which results from expanding the bohr - sommerfeld relation ( [ eq : bs ] ) for @xmath433 near @xmath72 and keeping only the dominant terms . define @xmath632 and @xmath633 then , for @xmath615 and @xmath616 , @xmath634 where we suppose that the scale @xmath404 is further constrained so that the relative error is asymptotically small . if @xmath22 is additionally bounded outside of some downward opening sector with vertex at @xmath72 , then @xmath635 _ proof : _ the proof of this lemma follows that of lemma [ lemma : originpeelsecond ] almost exactly and will not be repeated here . the only difference is that the square in that proof should be replaced here by the rectangle whose top side is @xmath636 and @xmath637 and whose bottom is @xmath638 . @xmath105 without any approximation , @xmath639 and @xmath640 can be rewritten in a more transparent form by expressing the products in terms of gamma functions and evaluating the logarithmic integrals exactly . introduce a local variable @xmath490 in terms of a transformation @xmath641 given by the relation @xmath642 and let @xmath213 be the positive constant @xmath643 in terms of these quantities , one finds that @xmath639 and @xmath640 take a simple form : @xmath644 and @xmath645 where @xmath646 and @xmath647 now , @xmath648 because @xmath213 is proportional to @xmath140 and @xmath407 is of the order of @xmath649 while @xmath650 . so again we can use stirling s formula to extract the dominant asymptotic contributions to @xmath639 and @xmath640 as @xmath118 tends to zero . [ lemma : iapeelthird ] as @xmath118 tends to zero through positive values , @xmath651 and @xmath652 _ proof : _ using stirling s formula , one expands @xmath653 to find @xmath654 the error here is dominated by the fact @xmath655 is the smallest large number involved . now we expand the powers that remain in conjunction with those in @xmath656 to find @xmath657 since @xmath658 , the relative error is dominated by @xmath659 . using this expression for the product @xmath660 in ( [ eq : s2iarewrite ] ) and ( [ eq : t2iarewrite ] ) , the lemma is proved . @xmath105 . in exactly the same way as in our study of the local behavior near the origin , we may combine lemmas [ lemma : iapeelfirst ] , [ lemma : iapeelsecond ] , and [ lemma : iapeelthird ] and choose the `` internal '' scale @xmath404 in terms of @xmath405 and @xmath118 to obtain asymptotics for @xmath153 and @xmath158 with optimized relative error . let @xmath615 , with @xmath661 , where @xmath505 , and let @xmath22 be bounded outside some fixed symmetrical sector with vertex at @xmath72 and opening downward . then @xmath662 where @xmath663 . [ prop : iaasymps ] let @xmath615 , with @xmath661 , where @xmath505 . then for all @xmath35 , however small , @xmath664 where @xmath663 . [ prop : iaasympt ] in particular it follows from these considerations that both @xmath153 and @xmath158 are uniformly bounded functions on their respective contours in any fixed neighborhood @xmath665 of @xmath117 . we claim that the quotient of the jump matrices for @xmath133 and @xmath393 is uniformly close to the identity matrix in @xmath665 as @xmath136 . since @xmath666 is , by definition , analytic throughout @xmath665 , it suffices to show that the jump matrix @xmath667 is uniformly close to the identity in @xmath665 . this will be the case if @xmath402 , @xmath403 , and @xmath267 are uniformly small on their respective contours . now for @xmath113 , @xmath668 so , with @xmath323 being real and strictly negative for @xmath669 according to proposition [ prop : tildephineg ] and @xmath158 being bounded , we see that @xmath267 is in fact exponentially small as @xmath118 tends to zero through positive values . similarly , for @xmath109 , @xmath670 where we have used ( [ eq : tauleft ] ) and the fact that @xmath328 on @xmath101 above @xmath671 . since @xmath672 , it is possible to choose the neighborhood @xmath665 small enough ( independent of @xmath118 ) so that @xmath673 throughout @xmath665 . since @xmath153 is bounded , it then follows that for @xmath674 , @xmath402 is exponentially small as @xmath118 tends to zero through positive values . virtually the same argument using ( [ eq : tauright ] ) in place of ( [ eq : tauleft ] ) shows that @xmath403 is also exponentially small for @xmath675 ( it may be necessary to make @xmath665 slightly smaller to have @xmath676 throughout @xmath665 ) . it follows that @xmath677 is exponentially small uniformly for the contours within @xmath665 . for this reason we expect that the outer model @xmath401 will be a good approximation to @xmath133 near @xmath117 even though @xmath678 and @xmath679 are not small . we do not need to construct a special - purpose local model for @xmath133 in this case . let @xmath399 be a circular disk centered at @xmath117 of sufficiently small radius ( independent of @xmath118 ) that @xmath680 and @xmath681 , and that @xmath357 and @xmath358 each have exactly one intersection with @xmath682 ( of course @xmath101 will have two intersection points with @xmath682 ) . this situation is possible as long as @xmath32 . the case of @xmath12 is a degenerate case that we will not treat in detail here . since @xmath32 and therefore @xmath683 , it follows from the definition ( [ eq : rhodefine ] ) of @xmath320 that as @xmath22 tends to @xmath307 along @xmath309 , @xmath315 vanishes like @xmath684 , and not to higher order . since @xmath315 may be extended from @xmath309 to be an analytic function in @xmath399 except for a branch cut along the part of @xmath101 in @xmath399 lying above the center , and since @xmath685 extended to this cut domain from @xmath309 is nonzero , it is easy to see that the function @xmath686 defines an invertible conformal mapping of all of @xmath399 to its image . consider the local variable @xmath490 defined by the relation @xmath687 . the image of @xmath399 in the @xmath490-plane is a neighborhood of @xmath569 that scales with @xmath118 such that it contains the disk centered at @xmath569 with radius @xmath688 for some constant @xmath689 . the transformation ( [ eq : varphiiax ] ) maps @xmath690 to a ray segment of the positive real @xmath490-axis , and takes the portion of @xmath101 in @xmath399 lying above @xmath310 to a ray segment of the negative real @xmath490-axis . we suppose that the contours @xmath357 and @xmath358 have been chosen so that @xmath691 and @xmath692 are straight ray segments with angles @xmath693 and @xmath694 respectively . for @xmath695 , the matrix @xmath696 satisfies the following jump relations : @xmath697\ ] ] for @xmath698 , oriented from right to left , @xmath699\ ] ] on the part of the ray @xmath700 in @xmath701 , oriented toward the origin , @xmath702\ ] ] on the part of the ray @xmath703 in @xmath701 , oriented toward the origin , and finally @xmath704\ ] ] for @xmath705 , oriented from right to left . the jump relation on the negative real @xmath490-axis follows from the formula ( [ eq : ntildemiddle ] ) which applies because @xmath706 here . in ( [ eq : ntildemiddle ] ) one uses the fact that @xmath707 for @xmath113 above @xmath307 , and the relation ( [ eq : phifromtheta ] ) giving @xmath323 above @xmath307 in terms of the analytic continuation of @xmath315 from @xmath309 , which one writes in terms of the local coordinate @xmath490 . as @xmath563 on all of the rays except for @xmath708 , the jump matrix for @xmath709 decays exponentially to the identity matrix . these jump conditions were precisely the ones that were neglected in obtaining the outer model . that is , the matrix @xmath710 defined for @xmath711 is analytic except on the positive real @xmath490-axis , where it satisfies @xmath712\,.\ ] ] it follows that the matrix @xmath713 can be decomposed into a product of a holomorphic prefactor depending on @xmath118 and a universal ( _ i.e. _ independent of @xmath118 ) local factor that takes care of the jump . we therefore may write @xmath714 where @xmath715 is holomorphic in @xmath701 and where @xmath716=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 } } \left[\begin{array}{cc } ( -\zeta)^{1/4 } & ( -\zeta)^{1/4}\\\\ -(-\zeta)^{-1/4 } & ( -\zeta)^{-1/4}\end{array}\right]\,.\ ] ] note that @xmath715 has determinant one . its matrix elements are of size @xmath717 for @xmath718 . it is easy to write down an explicit formula for @xmath715 because both @xmath713 and @xmath719 are known . we will now approximate @xmath709 by @xmath720 where @xmath721 is the solution of the following riemann - hilbert problem . let @xmath722 be the contour shown in figure [ fig : airycontour ] . find a matrix @xmath721 with the following properties : 1 . * analyticity : * @xmath721 is analytic for @xmath723 . * boundary behavior : * @xmath721 assumes continuous boundary values on @xmath722 . 3 . * jump conditions : * the boundary values taken on @xmath722 satisfy @xmath724\,,\hspace{0.2 in } \mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in}\arg(\zeta)=0\,,\ ] ] @xmath725\ , , \hspace{0.2 in}\mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in } \arg(\zeta)=-\pi/3\,,\ ] ] @xmath726\ , , \hspace{0.2 in}\mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in } \arg(\zeta)=\pi/3\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\mbox{and}\,,\ ] ] @xmath727\ , , \hspace{0.2 in}\mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in}\arg(\zeta)=\pi\,.\ ] ] 4 . * normalization : * @xmath721 is normalized at infinity so that @xmath728 [ rhp : airy ] we will describe how riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : airy ] can be solved explicitly . first , we make an explicit change of variable to a new matrix @xmath729 by setting @xmath730\ , . \label{eq : slocfromt}\ ] ] if @xmath721 satisfies riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : airy ] , then it follows that @xmath729 obeys the following jump relations : @xmath731\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in } \arg(\zeta)=0\,,\ ] ] @xmath732\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in } \arg(\zeta)=\pm\pi/3\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\mbox{and}\,,\ ] ] @xmath733\,,\hspace{0.2 in}\mbox{for}\hspace{0.2 in } \arg(\zeta)=\pi\,.\ ] ] it is a general fact that @xmath734 matrix functions that satisfy piecewise constant jump conditions , like the matrix @xmath729 does , can be expressed in terms of solutions of @xmath25th order linear differential equations with meromorphic ( and often rational , or even polynomial ) coefficients . in the @xmath735 case , classical special functions therefore play a key role . in this case , we see immediately from the fact that the boundary values taken by @xmath736 on @xmath722 are continuous that the matrix @xmath737{\bf s}^{\rm loc}(\zeta)^{-1}\ ] ] is analytic for @xmath738 . if we suppose that @xmath739 has a bounded derivative near the origin in each sector of @xmath740 a hypothesis that must be verified later then we see that in fact @xmath741 is analytic at the origin and is consequently an entire function of @xmath490 . to work out how @xmath741 behaves for large @xmath490 , we need to use the normalization condition ( [ eq : snorm ] ) for @xmath736 . we interpret ( [ eq : snorm ] ) to mean both that @xmath742 and also that @xmath743 both ( [ eq : snorm2 ] ) and ( [ eq : snorm2deriv ] ) are again hypotheses that must be verified once we obtain a solution for @xmath736 . they are not true _ a priori _ by virtue of ( [ eq : snorm ] ) alone ; for example the decay rate in ( [ eq : snorm ] ) might not be as fast as @xmath583 , and the error term might have rapid oscillations that would make its derivative larger than @xmath744 thus violating ( [ eq : snorm2deriv ] ) . it follows from our hypotheses that @xmath741 must be a polynomial ; in fact , @xmath745\,.\ ] ] under our hypotheses , it then follows that the matrix @xmath729 solves the linear differential equation @xmath746{\bf t}(\zeta)\,.\ ] ] upon introducing the new independent variable @xmath747 we see that the elements of the second row of @xmath748 satisfy airy s equation : @xmath749 and that the elements of the first row are given by @xmath750 so which solutions of airy s equation are the appropriate ones for our purposes ? the first observation is that we need to specify different solutions of airy s equation in each simply - connected region of the complex plane where @xmath751 and @xmath752 are analytic . the assignment of solutions in these regions must be consistent with the jump conditions and asymptotics for @xmath729 . from the jump conditions for @xmath729 , we can see that in fact @xmath751 is analytic in @xmath753 , while @xmath752 is analytic except when @xmath754 or @xmath755 . we now want to use the normalization condition ( [ eq : snorm2 ] ) to find sectors in which @xmath756 and @xmath757 are exponentially decaying . then we will be able to uniquely identify these functions with particular solutions of airy s equation that also decay . from the presumed asymptotic relation ( [ eq : snorm2 ] ) we have ( in terms of the variable @xmath419 ) , @xmath758 and @xmath759 as @xmath760 with @xmath761 . these show that @xmath751 is exponentially decaying for @xmath762 and also for @xmath763 , while @xmath752 is exponentially decaying for @xmath764 . significantly , both matrix elements are analytic throughout the sectors where they are exponentially decaying for large @xmath419 . as a basis of linearly independent solutions of airy s equation we take the functions @xmath765 and @xmath766 . these decay in different sectors , and have the asymptotic expansions @xmath767 as @xmath760 for @xmath761 , and @xmath768 as @xmath760 for @xmath762 . comparing the expansion of @xmath766 with that of @xmath751 in the sector @xmath762 , we find that here @xmath769 since @xmath756 is analytic in the lower half @xmath419-plane , this relation holds identically for @xmath770 . similarly , comparing the expansion of @xmath771 with that of @xmath752 in the sector @xmath764 , we find that here @xmath772 being as @xmath757 is analytic for @xmath773 , this identity holds throughout the sector of analyticity . restoring the original independent variable @xmath490 , we find that for @xmath774 , @xmath775 and therefore throughout the same domain , @xmath776 for @xmath490 with @xmath777 or @xmath778 , @xmath779 and therefore throughout the same domain , @xmath780 the sector of @xmath740 that is contained in both of these domains is @xmath781 . it is sufficient to have specified the matrix elements of @xmath729 in this sector , since it may be consistently obtained in the remaining sectors of @xmath740 by making use of the jump relations for @xmath729 . the procedure is consistent because the cyclic product of these jump matrices is the identity : @xmath782 \left[\begin{array}{cc } 1 & 1 \\\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right]^{-1 } \left[\begin{array}{cc } 0 & -1 \\\\ 1 & 0\end{array}\right]^{-1 } \left[\begin{array}{cc } 1 & 1 \\\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right]^{-1 } = { \mathbb i}\,.\ ] ] once @xmath729 is known for @xmath783 , the original unknown matrix @xmath736 solving riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : airy ] is obtained directly by the transformation ( [ eq : slocfromt ] ) . it suffices to give a formula that holds for @xmath781 . we find @xmath784 we will have found a solution to riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : airy ] if we can verify the two hypotheses ( _ cf . _ equations ( [ eq : snorm2 ] ) and ( [ eq : snorm2deriv ] ) ) we made regarding the interpretation of the normalization condition ( [ eq : snorm ] ) and the differentiability of @xmath736 at @xmath569 . one verifies these directly , using the explicit formulae given here . to build a better model for @xmath133 in the disk @xmath399 than @xmath393 , we begin by recalling the exact relationship between the matrix @xmath359 and the matrix @xmath785 : @xmath786 for all @xmath787 . the matrix @xmath286 is also explicitly related to @xmath359 . for @xmath787 in the part of the lens between the contours @xmath357 and @xmath101 , @xmath788\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,,\ ] ] for @xmath787 in the part of the lens between the contours @xmath101 and @xmath358 , @xmath789\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,,\ ] ] and for all other @xmath787 , we simply have @xmath790 . as we do not expect the difference between @xmath133 and the formal continuum limit approximation @xmath286 to be important in the disk @xmath399 since it is isolated from the points @xmath116 and @xmath117 , we can obtain a guess for an approximation for @xmath133 that should be valid in @xmath399 simply by substituting @xmath791 for @xmath792 in these formulae . putting these steps together , the model for @xmath133 for @xmath787 that we will use is defined as follows . for @xmath787 in the lens between @xmath357 and @xmath101 , set @xmath793\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,,\ ] ] for @xmath787 in the lens between @xmath101 and @xmath358 , set @xmath794\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,,\ ] ] and for all other @xmath787 , set @xmath795 where @xmath796 is defined by ( [ eq : shatdef ] ) . the most important properties of the matrix @xmath797 in the disk @xmath399 are the following . the matrix @xmath798 is piecewise analytic in the left and right half - disks of @xmath399 . on the imaginary axis ( which bisects @xmath399 ) oriented in the positive imaginary direction , @xmath799 that is , the local model has exactly the same jump as @xmath285 . for @xmath787 , the matrix function @xmath800 is bounded by a constant of order @xmath801 . also , for @xmath802 , @xmath803 [ prop : endpointproperties ] _ proof : _ computing the jump matrix for @xmath797 is straightforward . to show the bound on @xmath798 , we recall that @xmath804 is bounded by a quantity of order @xmath805 , and note that the other factor of the same size comes from the factor @xmath806 via the normalization condition on this matrix and the fact that @xmath807 grows like @xmath808 for @xmath787 . similar reasoning using ( [ eq : snorm2 ] ) establishes the error in matching onto @xmath666 on the boundary of @xmath399 . we are now in a position to put all of our models together to build a guess for a uniformly valid approximation of @xmath133 . such a guess is called a parametrix . to build the parametrix @xmath809 as a sectionally holomorphic matrix function , we simply combine the outer and local models . for all @xmath22 satisfying @xmath504 , where the parameter @xmath810 is to be determined later , set @xmath811 for @xmath787 , we set @xmath812 and by symmetry for all @xmath813 we set @xmath814 finally , for all remaining @xmath815 , set @xmath816 the parametrix @xmath809 is holomorphic for @xmath817 , where @xmath818 is the contour illustrated in figure [ fig : sigmahat ] . to determine the accuracy of the parametrix , we compare it directly with the original matrix @xmath133 . that is , we consider the error matrix defined by @xmath819 this matrix is sectionally analytic in the complex @xmath22-plane , with discontinuities on a contour @xmath820 that is illustrated in figure [ fig : sigmae ] . note that as a consequence of the symmetry of @xmath809 and @xmath133 under complex conjugation , we have @xmath821 . if the parametrix is indeed a good model for @xmath133 , then we must be able to show that the matrix @xmath822 is uniformly close to the identity matrix in the whole complex plane . while we do not know @xmath822 explicitly like we know @xmath809 , we know from the normalization condition of both factors that @xmath823 it turns out that we can also calculate explicitly the ratio of boundary values taken by @xmath822 from both sides on each arc of @xmath820 . that is , we know the jump matrix for @xmath824 , and can express it explicitly in terms of @xmath825 and the jump matrix for @xmath133 , both of which are known in terms of the matrix function @xmath826 for which we have an existence proof and a characterization , but not an explicit formula . ] . this means that the matrix @xmath822 itself is a solution of a particular riemann - hilbert problem for which we know the data . by solving this riemann - hilbert problem , we will show that indeed @xmath822 is uniformly close to the identity matrix . there are two kinds of arcs in the contour @xmath820 : `` matching '' arcs of the circles @xmath682 , @xmath827 , and @xmath611 where two different components of the parametrix have to match well onto each other , and the remaining arcs within the disks and outside the disks where the jump matrix for @xmath809 should be a good approximation to that of @xmath388 . consider one of the arcs of @xmath820 oriented in some convenient way , and as usual let the subscript `` @xmath107 '' ( respectively `` @xmath108 '' ) denote a boundary value taken on the arc from its left ( respectively right ) . we can easily see from the definition ( [ eq : error ] ) that for @xmath22 on this arc , @xmath828 where @xmath829 and @xmath830 denote the jump matrices on the arc for @xmath133 and the parametrix @xmath809 respectively . if the arc under consideration is a `` matching '' arc , then the discontinuity in @xmath824 is wholly due to the mismatch of components of the parametrix , and the jump matrix @xmath829 is therefore replaced with the identity matrix in ( [ eq : ejump ] ) . it then follows that an equivalent formula for @xmath831 on a `` matching '' arc is the following : @xmath832 in this case , the two boundary values represent different components of the parametrix , for example @xmath393 would play the role of @xmath833 and @xmath797 would play that of @xmath834 if the `` matching '' arc under consideration is an arc of @xmath682 , oriented clockwise . the key fact that we need now is the following . the optimal value of the radius parameter @xmath810 is @xmath835 . for this value of @xmath810 , and for all @xmath35 arbitrarily small , @xmath836 uniformly for all @xmath837 . [ prop : errorjumpbound ] _ proof : _ we begin by considering the `` matching '' arcs . we take the circle @xmath682 to be oriented in the clockwise direction . here we find @xmath838 with the error estimate coming from proposition [ prop : endpointproperties ] . an estimate of the same form necessarily holds on the `` matching '' arcs of @xmath827 according to the conjugation symmetry of @xmath822 . the remaining `` matching '' arcs lie on the circle @xmath611 , which again we take to be oriented in the clockwise direction . here we find @xmath839 with the error estimate coming from proposition [ prop : originmodelproperties ] . we continue by considering the arcs of @xmath820 with @xmath601 . using the fact recorded in proposition [ prop : originmodelproperties ] that @xmath840 has determinant one and is uniformly bounded , we see from ( [ eq : ejump ] ) that the important quantity to estimate is simply @xmath841 , the difference between the jump matrix ratio and the identity . first , consider the portion of the contour @xmath99 with @xmath842 . using proposition [ prop : originmodelproperties ] and ( [ eq : cljumpn ] ) , we find that here @xmath843 \sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ , , \label{eq : clquotient}\ ] ] where @xmath539 . using ( [ eq : almodel ] ) and the uniform boundedness of the leading - order term on the right - hand side of ( [ eq : almodel ] ) for @xmath601 , we see that the matrix quotient in ( [ eq : clquotient ] ) differs from the identity matrix by an order @xmath844 amount . virtually the same argument using ( [ eq : crjumpn ] ) and ( [ eq : armodel ] ) in conjunction with proposition [ prop : originmodelproperties ] establishes that on @xmath100 the matrix quotient @xmath845 differs from the identity by a quantity of order @xmath844 . next , consider the contour @xmath357 for @xmath601 . on this contour , there is no jump for @xmath133 , so @xmath846 in the formula ( [ eq : ejump ] ) for @xmath847 . but from the formula for @xmath848 for @xmath365 given in proposition [ prop : originmodelproperties ] , we see by ordinary taylor expansion that for @xmath601 , we have @xmath849 for @xmath365 . virtually the same argument yields the same estimate for @xmath850 on @xmath358 with @xmath601 . finally consider the contour @xmath101 ( the positive imaginary axis ) with @xmath601 . using ( [ eq : cmjumpn ] ) and the jump matrix @xmath830 for @xmath113 recorded in proposition [ prop : originmodelproperties ] , we find that here @xmath851\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,,\ ] ] where @xmath852 is given in terms of @xmath539 by ( [ eq : delta ] ) and where @xmath853 note that @xmath854 and @xmath855 are both of order @xmath856 for @xmath601 by taylor expansion arguments . also , @xmath852 is uniformly bounded in the disk of radius @xmath857 , and @xmath858 both have modulus one for @xmath113 in this disk . also , from ( [ eq : ammodel ] ) we get @xmath859 for all @xmath35 since @xmath327 on this part of @xmath101 . this error dominates those arising from taylor approximation , and thus on @xmath101 with @xmath601 we find that @xmath860 . the corresponding estimates hold on the corresponding contours in the lower half - disk , by conjugation symmetry . putting this information together with the uniform boundedness of @xmath600 and its inverse , we find that for all @xmath861 with @xmath601 , @xmath862 for all @xmath35 . now we proceed to study the jump matrix @xmath831 inside the disk @xmath399 centered at the endpoint @xmath310 , assuming @xmath32 is fixed so that @xmath399 is fixed and bounded away from the origin and from @xmath117 . the only contour we need to consider is the imaginary axis . the jump matrix @xmath831 is given by ( [ eq : ejump ] ) . this time , the conjugating factors of @xmath863 and its inverse are not uniformly bounded in @xmath399 as @xmath118 tends to zero . according to proposition [ prop : endpointproperties ] each conjugating matrix contributes an amplifying factor of @xmath801 . also according to proposition [ prop : endpointproperties ] , we have that @xmath864 is the same as the jump matrix for @xmath286 . therefore , using ( [ eq : cmjumpn ] ) and ( [ eq : ntildemiddle ] ) , we find that @xmath865\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,.\ ] ] using proposition [ prop : a_m ] and the fact that @xmath866 while @xmath867 has modulus one on @xmath101 within @xmath399 , we get that @xmath868 for all @xmath268 . combining this with the bounds on the conjugating factors , we find that within @xmath399 , @xmath869 for all @xmath268 . by conjugation symmetry , the same estimate holds for the jump matrix @xmath831 when @xmath813 . finally , we consider the parts of @xmath820 outside all of the disks , where we have set @xmath870 . on all of these parts of @xmath820 , proposition [ prop : noutproperties ] guarantees that the conjugating factors @xmath871 and @xmath872 are uniformly bounded as @xmath118 tends to zero . so it remains to determine the magnitude of the difference between the quotient @xmath873 and the identity . first consider the part of @xmath101 between the disk at the origin and the disk @xmath399 . using proposition [ prop : noutproperties ] to find @xmath848 and recalling ( [ eq : cmjumpn ] ) , we find @xmath874\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\,.\ ] ] using proposition [ prop : a_m ] and the fact that @xmath327 while @xmath867 has modulus one here then allows us to conclude that @xmath875 for all @xmath268 . the @xmath810 appears because we need the estimate down to the outside boundary of the shrinking disk at the origin . next we look at the contours @xmath357 and @xmath358 . on these contours there is no jump for @xmath133 , and we see directly from proposition [ prop : noutproperties ] that @xmath876 is exponentially small as @xmath118 tends to zero through positive values . the next contour we examine is the portion of @xmath101 lying above the disk @xmath399 . here we observe that @xmath401 has no jump , and because we have on this contour the strict inequality @xmath353 , the matrix @xmath877 is exponentially close to the identity matrix . to see this , note that here @xmath878\sigma_1^{\frac{1-j}{2}}\ ] ] because @xmath328 . while the relative error in replacing @xmath267 by @xmath879 is not small near @xmath117 , it is bounded . so the exponential decay afforded by the strict inequality on the real part of @xmath323 is maintained . virtually the same arguments show that on the contours @xmath99 and @xmath100 outside of the disk at the origin , the quotient @xmath873 is again an exponentially small perturbation of the identity matrix , since on these contours there is again no jump of the parametrix @xmath393 . therefore , for all @xmath861 outside all disks , we have @xmath880 for all @xmath268 . we come up with an overall estimate for @xmath881 for @xmath837 by combining the estimates ( [ eq : ve1 ] ) , ( [ eq : ve2 ] ) , ( [ eq : ve3 ] ) , ( [ eq : ve4 ] ) , and ( [ eq : ve5 ] ) , and optimizing the error by choosing the parameter @xmath810 . the optimal balance among all @xmath882 comes from taking @xmath835 , which gives an overall error estimate of @xmath883 uniformly for all @xmath861 , for all @xmath35 . this proves the proposition . @xmath105 the following is then a consequence of the @xmath36 theory of riemann - hilbert problems ( see the analogous discussion in @xcite ) . for @xmath118 sufficiently small , the riemann - hilbert problem for @xmath822 has a unique solution . let @xmath884 be sufficiently large so that @xmath820 is contained in the circle of radius @xmath885 centered at the origin . then uniformly for all @xmath22 outside of this circle , and for all @xmath268 however small , the matrix @xmath824 satisfies @xmath886 with the size of the matrix measured in any matrix norm . _ proof : _ only one thing must be verified in order to deduce existence and uniqueness from the general theory : the cauchy - kernel singular integral operators defined on the contour @xmath820 , which depends on @xmath118 because of the shrinking boundary of the circle at the origin , have @xmath887 norms that can be bounded uniformly in @xmath25 . but this fact follows in this case from the fact that for @xmath25 sufficiently large , the circle @xmath611 intersects only radial straight - line segments ( we chose the contours to all be exactly straight lines in some fixed neighborhood of the origin ) , so that the portion of @xmath820 near the origin simply scales with @xmath857 . the uniform bound we need can then be established using the fact that the cauchy operators commute with scaling . a similar result was established under more general conditions in @xcite . once existence and uniqueness have been established , the estimate of @xmath822 follows from an integral representation formula for this matrix : @xmath888 in which the matrix function @xmath41 for @xmath889 is an element of @xmath887 with a norm that is bounded independently of @xmath118 ( and in fact converges to the identity matrix in @xmath887 as @xmath118 tends to zero ) . @xmath105 we are now in a position to prove our main result , which we presented as theorem [ theorem : mainresult ] in the introduction . _ proof of theorem [ theorem : mainresult ] : _ we have been setting @xmath3 all along , so the function @xmath890 given by ( [ eq : psi0define ] ) can be found from the matrix @xmath133 by the relation ( _ cf . _ equation ( [ eq : potentialrecovery ] ) ) @xmath891 writing @xmath892 , we get @xmath893 now , the first term on the right - hand side of ( [ eq : controlpsi ] ) can be evaluated explicitly since near @xmath894 we have @xmath895 , and we have an explicit formula ( _ cf . _ equation ( [ eq : otildesolution ] ) ) for @xmath374 . we find @xmath896 which is the `` true '' initial data that we started with , before making any modifications based on the wkb approximation of the spectral data . when we consider the second term on the right - hand side of ( [ eq : controlpsi ] ) , we see that as a consequence of the normalization of the matrices @xmath822 and @xmath825 , @xmath897 as @xmath135 . therefore the second term on the right - hand side of ( [ eq : controlpsi ] ) vanishes identically . finally , for the third term on the right - hand side of ( [ eq : controlpsi ] ) we can again apply the normalization condition for @xmath809 to obtain @xmath898 putting these steps together , we have @xmath899 the proof of the theorem is finished upon using the integral formula ( [ eq : cauchyformula ] ) for @xmath822 and proposition [ prop : errorjumpbound ] . using the new technique of simultaneous interpolation of residues by two different analytic interpolating functions , combined with `` steepest - descent '' techniques for matrix - valued riemann - hilbert problems , we have established the validity of the formal wkb approximation of the spectrum in the nonselfadjoint zakharov - shabat eigenvalue problem ( [ eq : zs ] ) in the sense of pointwise convergence of the potentials . strictly speaking , our analysis applies to certain classes of potential functions whose most important property for our purposes is their real analyticity , and then we obtain convergence for all nonzero values of @xmath4 . in order to extend the result of theorem [ theorem : mainresult ] to @xmath12 , some different steps are required . since @xmath900 as @xmath901 , the local analysis that we carried out independently for @xmath902 ( _ cf . _ [ sec : local_ia ] ) and for @xmath903 ( _ cf . _ [ sec : local_ia(x ) ] ) will need to be combined . consequently , a different local model for @xmath133 will need to be constructed near @xmath904 . due to the presence of the gamma functions in the asymptotics established in [ sec : local_ia ] and given in proposition [ prop : iaasymps ] and proposition [ prop : iaasympt ] , it is likely that the construction of the local model will require knowledge of the solution of a new riemann - hilbert problem that , like that for the matrix @xmath568 in [ sec : origin ] , can not be solved explicitly . nonetheless , one expects that to establish the validity of theorem [ theorem : mainresult ] for @xmath12 will require only technical modifications of what we have done here . understanding the nature of the wkb approximation at the level of the potentials is one step in a larger ongoing program to obtain corresponding information at the level of the ( unknown ) spectrum itself . indeed , quantifying the difference between the true spectrum of a given potential @xmath10 and the wkb approximation of the spectrum , in terms of motion of eigenvalues , will be necessary before it can be proven that the rigorous asymptotic analysis of sses is relevant to the problem of semiclassical asymptotics for the initial - value problem for the focusing nonlinear schrdinger equation ( [ eq : nls ] ) . one imagines that a study of the semiclassical limit for ( [ eq : nls ] ) should proceed by first generating from the given initial data @xmath905 the corresponding well - defined sse , and then using the fact that by combining the results of @xcite with theorem [ theorem : mainresult ] from this paper , one has a complete picture of the limiting behavior of the sse for an open interval of time @xmath5 that is independent of @xmath23 and includes @xmath3 , and moreover that according to theorem [ theorem : mainresult ] the sse is pointwise close to the given initial data @xmath10 for @xmath3 . the problem here is that the focusing nonlinear schrdinger equation is known to have modulational instabilities whose exponential growth rates become arbitrarily large in the semiclassical limit . there is , therefore , the very real possibility that while the sse is close to the initial data @xmath10 at @xmath3 , it is not close to the corresponding solution of ( [ eq : nls ] ) for any positive @xmath5 . in order to control the difference for positive time , it is necessary to know in advance how much the sse spectral data differs from the true ( unknown ) spectral data , as it is the spectral data that is the starting point for analysis ( _ cf . _ riemann - hilbert problem [ rhp : meromorphic ] ) . one can imagine obtaining this sort of information from the pointwise estimate given in theorem [ theorem : mainresult ] by rayleigh - schrdinger perturbation theory . i would like to thank jinho baik , thomas kriecherbauer , and ken mclaughlin for useful feedback . this work was supported in part by the national science foundation under award number dms-0103909 . kmm00 j. baik , t. kriecherbauer , k. t .- mclaughlin , and p. d. miller , `` strong asymptotics for discrete orthogonal polynomials '' , in preparation . p. deift , s. kamvissis , t. kriecherbauer , and x. zhou , `` the toda rarefaction problem '' , _ comm . pure appl . _ , * 49 * , 3583 , 1996 . p. deift , t. kriecherbauer , k. t .- mclaughlin , s. venakides , and x. zhou , `` strong asymptotics of orthogonal polynomials with respect to exponential weights '' , _ comm . pure appl . math._,*52 * , 14911552 , 1999 . p. deift , s. venakides , and x. zhou , `` the collisionless shock region for the long - time behavior of solutions of the kdv equation '' , _ comm . pure appl . _ , * 47 * , 199206 , 1994 . p. deift and x. zhou , `` a steepest descent method for oscillatory riemann - hilbert problems : asymptotics for the mkdv equation '' , _ ann . _ , * 137 * , 295368 , 1993 . n. ercolani , s. jin , c. d. levermore , and w. macevoy , jr . , `` the zero dispersion limit of the nls / mkdv hierarchy for the nonselfadjoint zs operator '' , preprint , 1993 . a. s. fokas , a. r. its , and a. v. kitaev , `` the isomonodromy approach to matrix models in 2d quantum gravity '' , _ comm . _ , * 147 * , 395430 , 1992 . s. kamvissis , k. t .- mclaughlin , and p. d. miller , `` semiclassical soliton ensembles for the focusing nonlinear schrdinger equation '' , submitted to _ ann . online copy available at ` http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.si/0012034 ` a. b. j. kuijlaars and e. a. rakhmanov , `` zero distributions for discrete orthogonal polynomials '' , _ j. comput . _ , * 99 * , 255274 , 1998 . corresponding corrigendum : _ j. comput . _ , * 104 * , 213 , 1999 . p. d. lax and c. d. levermore , `` the small dispersion limit of the korteweg - de vries equation . i , ii , iii '' , _ comm . pure appl . _ , * 36 * , 253290 , 571593 , 809830 , 1983 . s. venakides , `` the korteweg - de vries equation with small dispersion : higher order lax - levermore theory '' , _ comm . pure appl . _ , * 43 * , 335361 , 1990 . v. e. zakharov and a. b. shabat , `` exact theory of two - dimensional self - focusing and one - dimensional self - modulation of waves in nonlinear media '' , _ sov . jetp _ , * 34 * , 6269 , 1972 . Abstract:
[ "rigorous pointwise asymptotics are established for semiclassical soliton ensembles ( sses ) of the focusing nonlinear schrdinger equation using techniques of asymptotic analysis of matrix riemann - hilbert problems . the accumulation of poles in the eigenfunction is handled using a new method in which the residues are simultaneously interpolated at the poles by two distinct interpolants . the results justify the wkb approximation for the nonselfadjoint zakharov - shabat operator with real - analytic , bell - shaped , even potentials . the new technique introduced in this paper is applicable to other problems as well : ( i ) it can be used to provide a unified treatment by riemann - hilbert methods of the zero - dispersion limit of the korteweg - de vries equation with negative ( soliton generating ) initial data as studied by lax , levermore , and venakides , and ( ii ) it allows one to compute rigorous strong asymptotics for systems of discrete orthogonal polynomials ." ]
21,092
21,092
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: as the nearest large spiral galaxy , m31 is a fundamental benchmark for studies of disk galaxy evolution , and our understanding of the evolution of m31 has changed profoundly during the past decade . there is a large body of evidence ( e.g. ibata et al . 2001 , 2007 ; hammer et al . 2007 ; tanaka et al . 2010 ) that interactions with companion galaxies , some of which may not have survived intact to the present day and remain only as debris trails , have occured throughout the history of m31 . the detection of similar tidal features close to other nearby galaxies ( e.g. martinez - delgado et al . 2010 ) indicates that galaxy - galaxy encounters in the local universe have not been rare , and have played a key role in sculpting the current appearance of many nearby galaxies . the current study focuses on investigating the star - forming history ( sfh ) of m31 during the past few hundred myr , using the brightest resolved stars as tracers . it has been suggested that m31 has interacted with some of its companions during this time , and a key element of our work is to search for observational signatures of this activity . a review that considers the entire history of m31 will guide our understanding of its present - day appearance , and allow a conceptual picture of the key events that shaped its evolution to be developed . to this end , in the remainder of this section we review previous work on the evolution of m31 . while current theories for the buildup of disk galaxies give primacy to the smooth accretion of hot and cold gas , the following focuses on the influence of major and minor mergers , as these imprint observable signatures on the kinematics , spatial distribution , and age distribution of stars . not every interaction can be traced in detail , especially those that happened more than a few dynamical times in the past , and the discussion of the earliest phases of the evolution of m31 are by necessity more speculative than the discussion of the most recent events . the ages listed in what follows should also be viewed as approximations . the initial assembly of m31 likely involved the merger of proto - galactic structures , which contained a mix of gas and stars that had formed _ in situ _ ( e.g. oser et al . 2010 ) . the gas in these structures probably contributed to the assembly of an m31 proto - disk , supplementing material accreted through the large - scale inflow of hot and cold gas . any early disk was likely short - lived due to the high frequency of major mergers . in addition to disrupting the early disk , mergers may also have spurred the formation of a classical metal - poor halo , through the displacement of stars out of the disk plane . stars ejected in such events are expected to dominate the central 20 kpc of halos ( zolotov et al . 2009 ) . at larger radii the majority of halo stars may not have had such a violent origin , and may instead have been accreted from companion galaxies during the first few gyr of galaxy assembly ( font et al . 2008 ; zolotov et al . 2009 ; cooper et al . 2010 ) . a classical metal - poor halo has been detected around m31 ( e.g. kalirai et al . 2006 ; chapman et al 2006 ; ibata et al . 2007 ; koch et al . 2008 ) . there is evidence that m31 accreted a number of satellites early - on . the integrated luminosities , masses ( @xmath6 m@xmath7 ) , and dynamical properties of the m31 and the galactic halos are similar ( chapman et al . 2006 ; ibata et al . 2007 ) , and the properties of galactic globular clusters suggest that 6 8 satellites large enough to form such large star clusters may have been accreted ( e.g. mackey & gilmore 2004 ; forbes & bridges 2010 ) . globular clusters in the m31 halo tend to be associated with tidal debris ( mackey et al . 2010 ) , and the range of ages , chemical mixtures , and overall metallicities amongst m31 clusters ( e.g. beasley et al . 2005 ) hints at diverse progenitors . some objects that were originally identified as globular clusters may not be simple stellar populations ( ssps ) ( e.g. davidge et al . 1990 ; meylan et al . 2001 , fuentes - carrera et al . 2008 ) , but instead may be the remnants of dwarf galaxies that were shredded early in the evolution of m31 ( fuentes - carrera et al . 2008 ) . the properties of classical globular clusters suggest that m31 and the galaxy may have experienced different chemical enrichment histories early - on . when compared with galactic globular clusters , the spectra of many m31 globular clusters have relatively strong cn absorption bands ( e.g. burstein et al . 1984 ; davidge 1990a ) , and this has been attributed to a comparatively large nitrogen abundance in m31 clusters ( burstein et al . such an abundance difference may have its origins in the numbers of present - day stars in globular clusters that formed in the diffuse proto - cluster environments , as opposed to those that formed in the more compact potential wells that existed after cluster formation ( carretta et al . 2010 ) , in the sense that m31 clusters are made up of a smaller fraction of progenitor stars . if correct , then the location of stars in m31 globular clusters on the [ na / fe ] versus [ o / fe ] diagram , which is a diagnostic of the rate of chemical enrichment , should differ from that defined by galactic objects . early merger activity likely also produced a pressure - supported bulge ( e.g. bekki & chiba 2001 ) . aside from the central few arcsec , the integrated spectrum of the m31 bulge at visible wavelengths originates predominantly from old stars ( e.g. davidge 1997 ; puzia et al . 2005 ; saglia et al . the brightest agb stars are well - mixed throughout the central @xmath8 kpc of the m31 bulge , as expected if they formed during a rapid , uniform star - forming episode ( davidge 2001b ) , such as would result from the violent merging of satellites . still , the structural ( e.g. beaton et al . 2007 ) and kinematic ( e.g. morrison et al . 2010 ) properties of the m31 bulge suggest that secular processes may have also contributed to its growth . the material from which stars in the galactic bulge formed may have been chemically enriched by the earliest generation of globular clusters ( davidge 2001a ) . if globular clusters did play a significant role in enriching the early ism of m31 then the chemical properties of stars in the bulge and globular clusters may show similarities . in fact , the strengths of cn absorption bands at visible wavelengths in the integrated spectrum of the inner bulge of m31 are reminiscent of those in m31 globular clusters ( davidge 1997 ) , suggesting a chemical kinship . a thick disk may also have been formed during the early assembly of m31 . using kinematic selection criteria , collins et al . ( 2011 ) detect a thick disk in m31 and find that the component stars are @xmath9 dex more metal - poor than thin disk stars at the same galactic radius . the estimated total mass of the thick disk suggests that it did not form from the destruction of a satellite that follows the trend between [ m / h ] and total mass defined by present - day systems . if the m31 thick disk formed from thin disk stars that were kinematically heated then its ( comparatively ) low metallicity suggests that this happened during early epochs , before the major merger that produced the extended extraplanar component discussed in the next section . the spatial extent of m31 at the end of its initial assembly was significantly smaller than the present - day galaxy . simulations suggest that a galaxy with a present - day mass like that of m31 probably accreted no more than one - half of this mass by moderate redshifts ( stewart et al . 2008 ) , while at @xmath10 the spatial extent of its disk may have been substantially ( by a factor of @xmath11 two - thirds ) smaller than its present - day value ( firmani & avila - reese 2009 ) . the modest size of the m31 progenitor aside , it was this system that served as the seed for the subsequent evolution that lead to the present - day galaxy . mergers were common events during intermediate epochs , and played a key role in sculpting the morphological properties of nearby disk galaxies ( hammer et al . 2007 ; 2009 ; van der kruit & freeman 2011 ) . simulations of a merger between a disk galaxy and a large companion find that the existing disk can be obliterated , with the orbits of disk stars thermalising to form a pressure - supported extraplanar population ( e.g. hopkins et al . a gas disk will re - form if the progenitors have sufficient quanities of gas ( robertson et al . 2006 ; governato et al . 2007 ) . there is evidence that a violent merger occured only a few gyr following the initial assembly of m31 . such an event would have profoundly affected the morphology of m31 , and may have produced features that are usually attributed to more recent interactions ( hammer et al . 2010 ) . the proposed merger heated the disk of m31 and produced a diffuse extraplanar component that is distinct from the classical metal - poor halo . it has long been known that the extraplanar regions of m31 are dominated by stars with metallicities that ( 1 ) are much higher than those in the galactic halo ( e.g. mould & kristian 1986 , pritchet & van den bergh 1988 , durrell et al . 2001 ) and ( 2 ) are consistent with an origin in either a large disk or an smc / lmc - like companion . more recently , a kinematically hot component ( e.g. chapman et al . 2006 ; gilbert et al . 2007 ) has been detected , that has been traced out to extraplanar distances of 60 kpc . this component is distinct from the thick disk , which has a vertical scale height of 3 kpc ( collins et al . the metallicities of stars in this component show little or no trend with distance from the galaxy ( chapman et al . 2006 ; koch et al . 2008 ; richardson et al . 2009 ) . a break in the surface brightness profile occurs near 30 kpc ( ibata et al . 2007 ) , possibly indicating the transition between a violently disturbed inner halo and a more metal - poor classical halo . the lack of sub - structure in the distribution of the moderately metal - rich extraplanar stars suggests that they are not the remnants of a galaxy that was slowly accreted by m31 , but instead are the result of a kinematically violent event . the extraplanar component must have an age of at least a few gyr , as the c / m5 + ratio is @xmath12 throughout the outer regions of m31 ( koch & rich 2010 ) . such a c star frequency amongst stars with a moderately sub - solar metallicity is suggestive of an age in excess of @xmath13 gyr ( e.g. cole & weinberg 2002 ) . brown et al . ( 2008 ) discuss observations of extraplanar fields with minor axis distances of 21 and 35 kpc , which are populated by stars with main sequence turn - off ( msto ) ages @xmath14 gyr . the age distribution is such that the majority of stars in the 35 kpc field are not associated with the early assembly of m31 , as only 10% are extremely old and metal - poor and so likely belong to the classical halo . that the bulk of the stars in the two brown et al . ( 2008 ) fields have ages @xmath15 gyr argues that ( 1 ) the merger occured a few gyr after the initial assembly of m31 , and ( 2 ) there has not been a subsequent merger of comparable magnitude while m31 has likely been subject to encounters with other galaxies in the more recent past ( see below ) , none of these have been as disruptive as the event described here . a sfr for m31 during this epoch can be estimated from the relation between the brightness of the brightest globular cluster , normalized to an age of 10 myr , and sfr . the most luminous globular cluster that is known to have formed during intermediate epochs is 292 - 010 , for which beasley et al . ( 2004 ) find a mass of @xmath16 m@xmath7 . the models of bruzual & charlot ( 2003 ) indicate that log(m / l)@xmath17 for a population with an age 10 myr , and so 292 - 010 would have had m@xmath18 when it was 10 myr old . applying relation 1 from bastian ( 2008 ) yields a sfr of @xmath19 m@xmath7 year@xmath20 . major mergers trigger large - scale star - forming activity that is not restricted to the central regions of the galaxy ( e.g. teyssier et al . 2010 ) , and m31 may have appeared as an ultra - luminous infrared galaxy ( ulirg ) for a period of time during intermediate epochs . star formation is seen throughout the disks of ulirgs , and is curtailed at progressively smaller radii as torques cause gas to move inwards ( e.g. soto & martin 2010 ) . if m31 was a typical ulirg then 5 10% of its current stellar mass may have been produced over a @xmath21 gyr ( marcillac et al . 2006 ) time span , and this is roughly consistent with the sfr estimated above from the brightest intermediate age globular cluster . the formation of globular clusters in the local universe is associated with the large - scale re - distribution of gas that occurs during major mergers ( e.g. whitmore et al . 1993 ) , and the concomitant violent turbulent stirring of the ism that produces dense star - forming clumps ( teyssier et al . globular clusters in m31 span a wide range of ages ( e.g. beasley et al . 2004 ; burstein et al . 2004 ; fusi pecci et al . 2005 ; caldwell et al . 2009 ) , and puzia et al . ( 2005 ) find peaks in the cluster age distribution at @xmath22 gyr , 8 gyr , and 1 gyr . the majority of globular clusters in m31 belong to the oldest age group , which is associated with the initial assembly of the galaxy . however , the number of clusters that belong to the 8 gyr peak and which likely formed during the major merger that produced the extraplanar component is a significant fraction of the older cluster system . these intermediate age clusters tend to be seen against the disk of the galaxy , and are not at large radii . to the extent that globular clusters are probes of a disturbed and turbulent ism , the 8 gyr cluster population is the remnant of an event that was almost as violent as the mergers associated with the initial assembly of m31 . a major merger would have imprinted signatures on the age distribution of stars throughout much of the disk . if the present - day disk of m31 formed during intermediate epochs following the obliteration of an earlier disk then there should be ( 1 ) an absence of disk stars with ages @xmath15 gyr , and ( 2 ) a large population of disk stars that formed @xmath23 gyr in the past - these are the field counterpart of the globular cluster population that formed at that time . in addition , starbursts deplete the gas supply at a rate that is an order of magnitude shorter than in a normal disk ( daddi et al . 2010 ) . therefore , the sfr would have plunged within a few disk rotation times of the merger . observations that fully test these predictions require photometric depths and angular resolutions that tax the capabilities of existing telescopes . still , olsen et al . ( 2006 ) investigate the sfh of bulge and disk fields in m31 , and find a preponderance of stars with ages @xmath14 gyr . this is consistent with the disk of m31 experiencing a large burst of star formation in the past that may not have been associated with the epoch of earliest disk assembly . m31 has not evolved in isolation since the major merger that spurred the formation of the present - day thin disk , and there is a high probability that there was a close encounter between m31 and m33 within the past few gyr . various studies have estimated when such an interaction may have occured . the sfh of m33 suggests that the encounter must have happened at least 0.5 gyr in the past ( davidge & puzia 2011 ) . using the locations and velocities of m31 and m33 , putman et al . ( 2009 ) argues that an encounter occured 1 3 gyr in the past , while bekki ( 2008 ) assigns an age of 4 8 gyr based on the properties of the hi bridge that may link the galaxies ( braun & thilker 2004 ) . simulations discussed by mcconnachie et al . ( 2009 ) that use currently available orbital constraints and the assumption that m33 was significantly perturbed by the encounter place this interaction a few billion years in the past . there is a high probability that the tidal radius of m33 was @xmath24 kpc during this encounter , and this would have disturbed the disk of m33 . the s - shaped hi distribution in the outer regions of m33 is testiment of such a disturbance , and this structure likely contains gas that was stripped from the m33 disk ( putman et al . the detection of extended stellar structures in the outer regions of the m33 disk , coupled with isophotal distortions at smaller radii , provide further evidence that the disk of m33 was disturbed ( mcconnachie et al . 2010 ; davidge & puzia 2011 ) . the disk of m31 would also have been affected by this event ( mcconnachie et al . 2009 ; davidge & puzia 2011 ) , with elevated levels of star - forming activity being sparked as tidal forces re - distributed gas . intermediate age globular clusters in m31 with ages @xmath25 gyr ( puzia et al . 2005 ) may have formed during this event . while the sfr of the m31 disk would have been greatly elevated immediately after the encounter , it would eventually drop as the ism is depleted and disrupted . there is evidence of a decrease in m31 star - forming activity @xmath8 gyr ago ( williams 2002 ) . given that the damping timescale for elevated sfrs is on the order of a few disk crossing times , then the drop in the sfr found by williams ( 2002 ) is consistent with an interaction that had peak star - forming activity @xmath25 gyr ago . if gas was re - distributed throughout m31 then intense star - forming activity would likely have been triggered in the galaxy center , and this part of m31 _ does _ contain stars that formed at a time that coincides with the proposed interaction with m33 . the integrated spectrum of the central few arcsec of m31 at visible wavelengths reveals a large population of objects with an age of a few gyr ( davidge 1997 ; silchenko et al . saglia et al . ( 2010 ) conclude from integrated spectra that the luminosity - weighted age of stars near the center of m31 is 4 8 gyr . mergers and interactions with companions that have @xmath27 the mass of the primary galaxy are not expected to permanently disrupt disks ( e.g. stewart et al . 2008 ) , and there is evidence that m31 has interacted with companions in this mass range during recent epochs . the most overt signature of such an encounter may be the giant stellar stream ( gss ; ibata et al . the gss is a substantial structure , with the northern and southern ends separated by at least 130 kpc along the line of sight ( mcconnachie et al . 2003 ) . the stellar content of the gss suggests that the progenitor was a massive dwarf galaxy , and ibata et al . ( 2001 ) discuss ngc 205 and m32 as possible sources . the photometric properties of rgb stars in the gss are indicative of a moderately metal - rich system , with a 0.5 dex dispersion in [ m / h ] ( mcconnachie et al . 2003 ) . using the red clump of core helium - burning stars as an age indicator , tanaka et al . ( 2010 ) conclude that stars in the gss have an age near 7 gyr , and a peak [ m / h ] near @xmath28 . this metallicity is comparable to that of stars in the lmc , and suggests a progenitor mass @xmath29 m@xmath7 . fardal et al . ( 2007 ) and ibata et al . ( 2007 ) arrive at similar progenitor mass estimates . upper limits to the mass of the progenitor can also be placed . assuming that the gss progenitor passed through the disk of m31 , then mori & rich ( 2008 ) conclude that it must have had a mass @xmath30 m@xmath7 so as not to widen the disk of m31 more than is observed . font et al . ( 2006 ) conclude that the encounter that formed the gss occured only a few hundred myr in the past , while mori & rich ( 2008 ) assign an age @xmath8 gyr . the age predicted for the gss by font et al . ( 2006 ) is similar to that modelled by block et al . ( 2006 ) for the supposed passage of a satellite ( presumably m32 ) through the m31 disk . the mean metallicity of stars in the outer regions of m32 is @xmath31 ( rose et al . 2005 ) , which is consistent with the metallicity of stars in the gss . models that attempt to reproduce the orbital properties of the gss predict that the encounter occured much more recently than might be inferred from its stellar content . the timings predicted by kinematic studies and the ages of stars in the gss are only in conflict if the progenitor contained a reservoir of cool gas that could have fueled star formation up to the time of its disruption . if the progenitor was depleted of gas a few gyr in the past and most present - day companions of m31 , such as m32 , are gas - depleted ( e.g. welch , sage , & mitchell 1998 ; sage , welch , & mitchell 1998 ; grcevich & putman 2009 ) then there is a clear physical explanation for the apparent conflict between the kinematic and stellar content age estimates . the extraplanar regions of m31 are laced with stellar streams and tidal structures , some of which may or may not be related to the gss . the completeness of the catalog of these structures is uncertain , as there is a bias against the detection of metal - poor and/or old features . this bias occurs because higher surface brightness structures tend to have higher metallicities and/or formed more recently ( e.g. gilbert et al . 2009 ) . the diverse stellar contents of streamlets along the minor axis of m31 led ibata et al . ( 2007 ) to suggest that these structures have multiple progenitors , all of which based on metal content would have initially been larger than the fornax dwarf spheroidal . mori & rich ( 2008 ) find that a single minor merger can pollute a large fraction of the extraplanar regions of m31 within @xmath25 gyr of an encounter . still , they also find that some structures in the outer regions of m31 likely formed more than 3 4 gyr in the past , and so are not related in a direct way to the gss , to which they assign an age of 1 gyr . fardal et al . ( 2008 ) , tanaka et al . ( 2010 ) , and hammer et al . ( 2010 ) argue that many features in the outer regions of m31 could result from an interaction between m31 and a single galaxy . the stream - to - stream diversity in stellar contents indicates that a progenitor that produces multiple observed streams would likely have had a metallicity gradient , and such gradients are seen in nearby local group dwarf galaxies ( e.g. harbeck et al . 2001 ) . clues of a significant accretion event within the past few hundred myr also lurk in the central regions of m31 . the nuclear star cluster p3 has an age of 200 myr ( bender et al . 2005 ) , and hence formed at the same time as the events modelled by block et al . ( 2006 ) and font et al . davidge et al . ( 2006 ) find a bright object that is a few arcsec from the nuclear star cluster p3 . this source dominates the central light output of m31 at @xmath32 m and appears to be a massive dust - enshrouded agb star that based on its luminosity may have an age of a few hundred myr . saglia et al . ( 2010 ) find a counter - rotating ring of gas in the central regions of m31 , which they interpret as the remnant of a merger @xmath21 gyr in the past . they suggest that @xmath33 m@xmath7 of stars formed in the central parts of m31 following this merger . the disk of m31 also contains signatures of an event ( or events ) that disrupted the ism . the hi disk of m31 is twisted and warped ( e.g. corbelli et al . 2010 ) , and there is a significant non - rotational kinematic component ( e.g. unwin 1983 ) . yin et al . ( 2009 ) model the chemical properties and the distribution of gas and stars in m31 assuming evolution in isolation . the model does not match the observed gas content at large radii or the radial distribution of star - forming activity throughout the galaxy . yin et al . ( 2009 ) attribute these discrepancies to interactions . an alternative is to accept that the star - forming efficiency in m31 varies with radius , but stays constant throughout the galaxy ( e.g. marcon - uchida et al . 2010 ) . the location and distribution of star - forming regions in m31 also differ systematically from those in the galaxy and m33 . while star formation in the galaxy and m33 tends to be distributed along well - defined spiral arms , a large fraction of the star - forming activity in m31 occurs in rings at r@xmath34 and 14 kpc ( thilker et al . 2005 ; gordon et al . 2006 ; barmby et al . 2006 ) , in arcs , and in spiral arm fragments ( e.g. discussion in efremov 2010 ) . much of the star - forming activity is ( and has been for at least the past 100 myr - 6 ) concentrated in the ring at r@xmath34 kpc , which contributes substantially to the total h@xmath35 emission from m31 ( devereux et al . 1994 ) . despite the evidence that the ism of m31 has been disrupted , the star - forming environment in these rings is probably not too different from that in the galactic disk . indeed , gmcs in m31 fall along the same size versus line width relation as galactic gmcs ( sheth et al . 2008 ) , indicating a structural kinship . the depletion timescale of molecular gas indicates that m31 is much less efficient at forming massive stars than m33 ( tabatabaei & berkhuijsen 2010 ) . the strength of the uv radiation field throughout the m31 disk is only 40% that in the solar neighborhood ( montalto et al . 2009 ) , and the sfr of m31 is roughly one half that expected for a galaxy of similar mass and morphology that has evolved in isolation ( yin et al . williams ( 2003 ) infers a sfr of @xmath8 m@xmath7 year@xmath20 for m31 , based on studies of resolved stars over a 1.4 degree@xmath36 area . integrated light diagnostics suggest present - day sfrs for m31 of 0.3 ( tabatabaei & berkhuijsen 2010 ) , 0.4 ( barmby et al . 2006 ) and 0.6 ( kang et al . 2009 ) m@xmath7 year@xmath20 . these are lower than the sfr of the galaxy ( e.g. boissier & prantzos 1999 ; robitaille & whitney 2010 ) and are on par with the much less massive galaxy m33 ( hippelein et al . 2003 ; verley et al . 2007 ; verley et al . 2009 ) . in the present paper , deep megacam observations are used to study the locations and photometric properties of bright resolved stars throughout the disk of m31 . massive main sequence and evolved stars are detected , and these are used to characterize the sfh during the past few hundred myr and search for signatures of recent interactions . atmospheric seeing and sky emission restrict the photometric depth that can be achieved with ground - based datasets when compared with space - based observations . however , ground- and space - based datasets of nearby galaxies provide complementary information because they usually sample very different spatial scales . the spatial coverage of space - based datasets of m31 at visible and near - infrared wavelengths tend to be limited . the most extensive such dataset is that discussed by dalcanton et al . ( 2011 ) , which is restricted to the north east quadrant of the galaxy . in contrast , our megacam data cover almost the entire star - forming disk of m31 out to major axis distances in excess of 30 kpc ( @xmath37 scale lengths ) . such comprehensive spatial coverage is of interest since the sfh can vary with location over large spatial scales in disks ( e.g. davidge 2010 ; davidge & puzia 2011 ) . spatial variations of this nature can complicate efforts ( 1 ) to determine a representative global sfh if only part of the disk is sampled , and ( 2 ) to assess the large scale radial trends that are probes of galaxy evolution . two important considerations are the distance to m31 and the reddening model . an absolute distance modulus @xmath38 , computed by vilardell et al . ( 2010 ) from two double - lined spectroscopic eclipsing binaries , is adopted for this study . such systems are primary distance indicators ( de vaucouleurs 1978 ) , that rely on geometric parameters directly measured from the application of basic physics . distances measured with these objects should be less susceptible to calibration uncertainties than those computed from secondary distance indicators . the distance modulus adopted here is in excellent agreement with that computed from cepheids by riess et al . ( 2012 ) . the baseline reddening model consists of a linear combination of foreground ( a@xmath39 ; schlegel et al . 1998 ) and internal ( a@xmath40 ; pierce & tully 1992 ) components . the total extinction is thus a@xmath41 magnitudes . this corresponds to a@xmath42 , a@xmath43 , and a@xmath44 magnitudes , based on the relations listed in table 6 of schlegel et al . it is demonstrated in 4 that this total extinction holds for a ` typical ' main sequence star in our sample . of course , the reddening towards any given object depends on factors such as its age , location , and evolutionary state ( e.g. massey et al . 2009 ) , and it is not surprising that there is a substantial spread in extinction throughout the m31 disk . for example , hodge et al . ( 2010 ) find a dispersion of @xmath45 mag in @xmath46 measurements among young clusters . there is almost certainly an environmental component , as hodge et al . ( 2010 ) and perina et al . ( 2010 ) find @xmath47 ( a@xmath48 ) for young star clusters , whereas massey et al . ( 2007 ) measure @xmath49 ( a@xmath50 ) for young field stars in the m31 disk . the paper is structured as follows . the observations and the reduction of the data are discussed in 2 , while details of the photometric measurements , including their calibration and characterization , are discussed in 3 . color - magnitude diagrams ( cmds ) are presented in 4 , while the sfh of the m31 disk is investigated in 5 using the lfs of main sequence stars . the spatial distribution of main sequence and evolved stars is examined in 6 . the paper closes with a summary and discussion of the results in 7 . the data were recorded on the 3.6 metre cfht as part of the 2010b megacam ( boulade et al . 2003 ) observing queue . the detector in megacam is a mosaic of thirty six @xmath51 e2v ccds . these are deployed in a @xmath52 format , and cover roughly one degree@xmath36 exposure@xmath20 with 0.185 arcsec pixel@xmath20 . four fields that cover almost all of the star - forming disk of m31 were imaged through @xmath53 , and @xmath54 filters . the locations of the megacam pointings are shown in figure 1 . the observations for each field were obtained during a single continuous block of time , that typically spanned 2 hours . while archival @xmath55 and @xmath54 megacam data were available of the disk of m31 , images in these filters were still recorded for our program to secure a set of single epoch measurements , and thereby suppress scatter in colors that might arise from photometric variability over timescales @xmath56 hours . a log of the observations , showing dates of observations and exposure times for each field , is shown in table 1 . the @xmath57 images have markedly longer exposure times than the @xmath55 and @xmath54 images because of the comparatively low system throughput at shorter wavelengths . initial processing of the data was done with the cfht elixir pipeline , and this included bias subtraction and flat - fielding . each pipeline - processed image was divided into six @xmath58 ccd sub - mosaics to produce datasets of a manageable size for subsequent processing and photometric analysis . sub - mosaic images were spatially registered to correct for offsets introduced during acquisition , and the results were stacked according to field and filter . the megacam optics produce modest chromatic distortions across the imaged field , which manifest as location - dependent offsets between the centroids of stars imaged in different filters . the offsets between @xmath57 and @xmath55 images taken at moderate airmass and aligned near the optical axis of the instrument can be up to an arcsec near the edge of the megacam science field . to correct for these , the @xmath57 and @xmath54 data were mapped into the @xmath55 reference frame using the iraf geomap / geotran tasks . stars in the final distortion - corrected images typically have fwhm @xmath59 arcsec . photometric measurements were made with the point spread function ( psf)-fitting program allstar ( stetson & harris 1988 ) . each psf was constructed from between 50 to 100 bright , unsaturated stars using routines in the daophot package ( stetson 1987 ) . in addition to brightness , psf stars were selected using star - like appearance and the absence of bright neighbors as criteria . faint companions were subtracted from the wings of psf stars in an iterative manner , using progressively improved psfs . following the procedure described by davidge ( 2010 ) , the raw photometric catalogues produced by allstar were culled of extended and very faint sources using the error in magnitude that is computed by allstar , @xmath60 . this quantity measures the quality of the psf fit , but does not take into account other sources of error , such as those introduced by crowding . while @xmath60 is only a lower limit to the total uncertainty in source brightness , it provides a means of identifying objects for which photometry may be problematic . two rejection criteria were applied . first , all sources with @xmath61 mag were deleted . obtaining meaningful photometric measurements is problematic for objects with such large uncertainties , the majority of which are near the faint limit of the data . second , point sources define a sequence in the magnitude _ vs. _ @xmath60 plane that is narrow at the bright end and fans out towards fainter magnitudes . objects that are outliers from this trend were removed . this step tends to remove extended sources ( e.g. davidge 2010 ) and cosmetic defects . standard stars are observed during each megacam observing block . these observations are used to determine photometric zeropoints , and the results are placed in megacam image headers during elixir processing . we used these header entries to transform instrumental magnitudes into the sloan digital sky survey @xmath62 system ( fukugita et al . we note that a comparison of photometric measurements in overlapping sections of fields indicates that the internal field - to - field calibration consistency is a few hundredths of a magnitude . there are significant differences between the @xmath57 and @xmath63 bandpasses , with the central wavelength of @xmath57 falling 200 redward of @xmath63 . our @xmath63 magnitudes were checked using the @xmath64 measurements of bright stars in m31 published by massey et al . the magnitudes from that study were transformed into the sloan system using equations from smith et al . ( 2002 ) , and the results were compared for stars in common with our dataset . the comparisons were restricted to bright stars in uncrowded parts of m31 to suppress the influence of image quality differences between the kpno and cfht observations . one consequence of restricting the areal coverage in this way is that the majority of the stars used in the comparison have red colors , as the main body of the star - forming disk ( where bright blue stars tend to be found ) is intentionally avoided . this caveat notwithstanding , there is excellent agreement between the two sets of measurements , with @xmath65 and @xmath66 , in the sense cfht kpno . the standard deviations about the mean are @xmath67 and @xmath68 . this agreement is comparable to that found by davidge & puzia ( 2011 ) in their study of m33 . sample completeness and uncertainties in the photometry were assessed through artificial star experiments . artificial stars were assigned magnitudes and colors that hold for main sequence stars , which are the primary probes of the sfh in this paper . as with observations of real objects on the sky , an artificial star was considered to be recovered only if ( 1 ) it was detected in two filters ( either @xmath69 or @xmath70 ) , and ( 2 ) it survived the @xmath60based culling criteria described in 3.1 . the uncertainties and systematic effects in the photometry that arise due to crowding and/or statistical fluctuations in the noise increase substantially with magnitude when sample completeness drops below 50% . the magnitude at which 50% completeness occurs is thus one estimate of the faint limit . the artificial star experiments indicate that 50% completeness occurs near @xmath71 and @xmath72 in the outer regions of the disk , and @xmath73 and @xmath74 at intermediate radii along the major axis . these values are roughly consistent with the observed faint limits of the cmds ( 4 ) . the impact of crowding on photometry can be investigated by stacking images to simulate higher stellar densities ( e.g. davidge 2001b ) . a shortcoming is that foreground stars and background galaxies , which are more - or - less uniformly distributed on the sky over angular scales of a few degrees , are over - represented in the stacked images . this can be mitigated by selecting fields for stacking that have a moderately high initial stellar density , with the aim of minimizing the number of frames that are co - added to simulate a given stellar density . four @xmath75 pixel@xmath36 areas from field 1 were selected as the building blocks for the stacking analysis . these are @xmath76 arcmin from the center of the galaxy , where the average surface brightness is @xmath77 magnitudes arcsec@xmath78 ( walterbos & kennicutt 1987 ) . the faint limit of the cmds in this part of the disk is almost the same as the outermost parts of the disk ( 4 ) . two sub - fields were stacked to simulate a field with @xmath79 mag arcsec@xmath78 , while three were combined to simulate @xmath80 mag arcsec@xmath78 . all four sub - fields were combined to simulate @xmath81 mag arcsec@xmath78 . the magnitudes of stars in the stacked images were measured using the procedures discussed in 3.1 , and the resulting cmds are shown in figures 2 and 3 . the left hand column of each figure shows the cmds from the unstacked data , while the right hand column shows the cmds of the stacked images . the simulated surface brightness of each stacked field is also listed , along with the corresponding major axis radius from the walterbos & kennicutt ( 1987 ) light profile . as expected , crowding elevates the faint limit of the cmds as one moves to progressively higher surface brightnesses . an interesting practical result is that the photometry of sources with @xmath82 and @xmath83 appears not to be sensitive to surface brightness in the density regime investigated here . the brightest main sequence stars and agb stars in these data can thus be used to trace the distribution of young stars to within a few kpc of the galaxy center . we define six regions in the m31 disk to facilitate analysis and subsequent discussion . two regions are associated with the rings of uv and fir emission at r@xmath34 and 14 kpc , and these will be refered to as ring 10 and ring 14 . the inner disk is defined to be the region that is interior to ring 10 . the image stacking experiments in 3.4 indicate that crowding is an issue for all but the brightest stars with r@xmath84 kpc , and so the minimum radius for the inner disk is set at r@xmath85 kpc . the inner disk thus probes a region where the disk light dominates over that of the bulge ( e.g. figure a1 of tempel et al . the middle disk is located between ring 10 and 14 , while the outer disk is external to ring 14 . the outer disk is split into two radial intervals . this is done in part because the outer radius of the m31 disk is not clearly defined . in addition , there is evidence that the properties of star formation in low density environments may differ from those in the inner regions of disks ( bigiel et al . 2010 ) , while secular processes may play a key role in defining the stellar content at large radii ( e.g. roskar et al . 2008 ; sanchez - blazquez et al . the outermost regions of disks may then be an environment that is distinct from the inner disk , containing population gradients with physical drivers that differ from those at smaller radii . the @xmath86 cmds of roughly 2.1 million sources in various radial intervals are shown in figure 4 . hess diagrams are shown in figure 5 to allow the relative properties of objects in the faint portions of the cmds to be examined . the radial distances listed in each panel of figures 4 and 5 are in the plane of the disk and assume 75@xmath87 inclination . this inclination produces roughly circular rings when observations of warm dust emission are de - projected to simulate the face - on appearance of m31 ( gordon et al . 2006 ) . while the assumption of a single inclination is an obvious pragmatic choice , it is a simplification given that the gas disk of m31 is warped ( e.g. corbelli et al . this warping , coupled with the orientation of m31 on the sky , frustrates efforts to extract clean radial samples that are free of annulus - to - annulus contamination . young main sequence stars form a prominent plume in the cmds , with @xmath88 at the bright end , and @xmath89 near the faint end . bright blue stars are not restricted to ring 10 and ring 14 , and are seen in all cmds with r@xmath90 kpc . recent star formation has thus not been restricted exclusively to ring 10 and ring 14 . many of the blue objects with @xmath91 ( m@xmath92 ) are bright blue supergiants ( bsgs ) , although some of these may be young compact star clusters . the diffuse sequence of objects that is displaced @xmath93 magnitude in @xmath94 redward of the main sequence , and is most pronounced in the inner disk , ring 10 , and middle disk cmds with @xmath55 between 20 and 22 , is due to helium burning stars that are at the blue extrema of their evolution . this same feature is seen in figure 2 of mcquinn et al . ( 2011 ) . while the primary probe of evolved stars in our data is the @xmath95 cmd ( 4.2 ) , evolved red stars are also present in the @xmath86 cmds . a population of red objects with @xmath96 and @xmath97 is seen in the hess diagram of the inner disk region in figure 5 . isochrones ( see below ) indicate that evolved stars with ages of @xmath98 gyr pass through this part of the @xmath86 cmd . that these red sources occur in large numbers in the inner disk @xmath99 cmd when compared with the ring 10 and the middle disk cmds suggests that the sfr in the inner disk was elevated with respect to regions of m31 at larger radii within the past 200 myr ( 6 ) . background galaxies contribute significantly to the source counts near the faint limit of these data . the majority of background objects have red colors , and populate the jumble of red sources with @xmath97 that is most obvious in the outer disk cmds . not all background objects have red colors , and davidge & puzia ( 2011 ) found that a significant fraction of the objects with blue colors at large radii in m33 are star - forming regions in moderately distant background galaxies . this being said , source counts in areas where the number of m31 disk stars is expected to be small indicate that many of the blue objects with @xmath100 in the outer disk 2 cmd are _ bona fide _ main sequence stars in m31 . m31 is viewed at intermediate galactic latitudes , and foreground stars dominate the diffuse spray of objects with @xmath101 and @xmath94 between 1 and 3 that grows more prominent towards larger r@xmath2 . the blue edge of this sequence is defined by the msto of stars in the outer disk and halo of the galaxy , while the red envelope reflects the properties of low mass main sequence stars . not all of the sources with @xmath94 between 1 and 3 are in the foreground , and bsgs with @xmath102 and @xmath101 ( i.e. to the immediate right of the m31 main sequence ) are evident in the cmds of sources with r@xmath103 kpc . the @xmath86 cmds of sources in ring 10 and ring 14 are compared with solar metallicity isochrones from girardi et al . ( 2004 ) in figure 6 . metallicity gradients are present in many spiral galaxies , and so a comparison with isochrones having only one metallicity may seem suspect . however , the metallicities of bsgs in m31 with r@xmath2 between 5 and 12 kpc do not vary with radius ( trundle et al . 2002 ) , suggesting that the interstellar medium of m31 is well mixed , and that the metallicity gradient among moderately young stars is modest . therefore , with the exception of a single z = 0.004 sequence to demonstrate metallicity effects , the comparisons with isochrones are restricted to a single metallicity . the image stacking experiments discussed in 3 indicate that crowding does not affect greatly the photometric properties of objects with m@xmath104 , the majority of which are main sequence stars with ages @xmath105 myr . it is thus significant that the zero age main sequence ( zams ) defined by the isochrones falls along the blue envelope of main sequence stars , while the terminal age main sequence ( tams ) , defined by the red extent of main sequence evolution , follows the red envelope of the blue plume . that the observed blue plume is bracketed by these two evolutionary phases suggests that age is the dominant driver of main sequence width in our data , rather than photometric errors or differential reddening . ring 10 and ring 14 both contain very young stars . the brightest blue objects in ring 10 and ring 14 fall more - or - less along the 5 myr isochrone in figure 6 . this is not unexpected given that these annuli are known to contain areas of very recent star formation . it is also evident from the isochrones that the part of the cmd with m@xmath106 and @xmath107 contains evolved stars with ages @xmath108 gyr . hence , the red concentration of objects near the faint limit of the @xmath86 cmd contains intermediate age stars . the blue core helium - burning ( bheb ) sequence in m31 is not well - matched by the locus of blue loops in the z = 0.019 isochrones , in the sense that the locus of blue loops during supergiant evolution is almost 1 magnitude in @xmath94 redward of the observed sequence . mcquinn et al . ( 2011 ) also found differences between the observed and predicted colors of the bheb sequence in their sample of dwarf galaxies . such disagreements with observations may be due to for example errors in the physics used to generate the models , uncertainies in circumstellar extinction , or uncertainties in the metallicities adopted for the stars . an interesting result from figure 4 of mcquinn et al . ( 2011 ) is that the colors predicted for bheb stars do not change greatly with metallicity when z @xmath109 . the blue loop of the z = 0.004 isochrone in figure 6 overlaps the m31 bheb sequence , and one _ possible _ explanation for the poor agreement between the observed and predicted color of the bheb sequence in figure 6 is that the stars in m31 have a metallicity that is no more than one half solar ( i.e. [ m / h ] @xmath110 ) . however , we reiterate that metallicity is just one of the factors that may affect the color predicted for the bheb sequence . the comparisons in figure 6 assume the same reddening for each star . reddening maps have been constructed for m31 using the distribution of warm and cool dust , and these could be used to estimate reddening for individual sources . however , our megacam data are not consistent with the radial extinction trends predicted from dust emission . this is demonstrated in table 2 , where the mean @xmath94 color , @xmath111 , of sources with @xmath55 between 21.75 and 22.25 is given for 5 radial intervals . an iterative @xmath112 rejection filter was applied to suppress outliers . the standard deviation about the mean , @xmath113 , is also shown , along with the mean optical depth at each r@xmath2 , @xmath114 , taken from figure 4 of tempel et al . ( 2011 ) . the entries in table 2 indicate that the plume containing main sequence stars and bsgs has a dispersion @xmath115 magnitudes at @xmath116 , supporting the notion that photometric errors make only a modest contribution to the width of the main sequence . the entries in table 2 further indicate that neither the mean color of the main sequence nor the dispersion about the mean changes significantly with radius between r@xmath117 kpc and 15 kpc . indeed , the mean @xmath94 color of the main sequence in this large range of r@xmath2 varies by only a few millimagnitude . to be sure , there are area - to - area variations in extinction within each annulus . however , the radial consistency of the mean @xmath94 color indicates that these variations average out to a remarkable degree when stellar measurements are combined azimuthally . the uniform color of the main sequence ridgeline in table 2 is contrary to what might be expected based on the optical depth measurements from tempel et al . ( 2011 ) , which predict systematic radial variations in total extinction , with @xmath114 peaking in ring 10 . such an inconsistency would occur if the radial @xmath114 measurements obtained from dust emission do not apply to the majority of stars in each angular resolution element . indeed , a core assumption made by tempel et al . ( 2011 ) is that cool dust is uniformly distributed . there almost certainly @xmath118 a uniformly distributed cool dust component throughout the m31 disk ; however , there are also areas of cool dust emission that are concentrated on scales that are smaller than the angular resolution of the facilities that have probed fir emission , and such a component will skew @xmath119 measurements . the tempel et al . ( 2011 ) optical depth measurements are based on data from the spitzer telescope , the angular resolution of which is roughly 40 arcsec , or @xmath120 kpc in m31 , at @xmath121 m . each resolution element then has a spatial extent that is roughly one order of magnitude larger than that of a typical giant molecular cloud ( gmc ) . if a significant part of the cool dust emission within a resolution element originates from gmcs then the extinction of objects that are exterior to the gmcs , but still within the same observed angular resolution element , will be over - estimated . the stars that are obscured in gmcs by the cool dust may even be so heavily extincted that they are not detected at visible wavelengths , and if this is the case then the dust and observed stars are spatially de - coupled . in summary , if there is a cool dust component in m31 that is concentrated on gmc - like spatial scales , then the stars within at least some spitzer resolution elements will not be subject to the level of dust extinction that is predicted from dust emission . the @xmath95 cmds of roughly 3.6 million sources in the m31 disk are shown in figure 7 , while the corresponding hess diagrams are shown in figure 8 . foreground stars form a spray of objects at the bright end of the cmds in figure 7 that has a well - defined blue and red cut - off ; this sequence falls between @xmath122 and 2 , and is most obvious when @xmath123 . there is also a prominent blue plume with @xmath124 that contains main sequence stars . the blue plume is less well - defined in the @xmath95 cmds than in the @xmath86 cmds , and it is demonstrated below that this is probably a consequence of the trajectories followed by stars on this cmd as they evolve off of the zams . a collection of objects with @xmath125 and @xmath126 between 0 and 2 forms a prominent feature in the @xmath95 cmds . at small and intermediate r@xmath2 this part of the cmd is dominated by a mix of red core helium - burning ( rheb ) giants / supergiants and stars that are evolving on the agb . background galaxies make a progressively larger contribution to the faint red end of the cmds as one moves to larger r@xmath2 . the @xmath95 cmds of ring 10 and ring 14 are compared with solar metallicity isochrones from girardi et al . ( 2004 ) in figure 9 . the isochrones follow a near - vertical trajectory on the @xmath95 cmd after leaving the zams ; this continues past the tams until the onset of red loops , smearing the main sequence in a vertical direction on the cmds , and making the blue plume in the @xmath95 cmd near @xmath124 more diffuse than in the @xmath86 cmd . it is encouraging that the blue plume in the @xmath95 cmds is bracketed by the zams and the inflexion points in the isochrones that mark the onset of red loops . the isochrones indicate that the red jumble is made up of stars in a mix of evolutionary stages , some of which are rheb and others evolving on the agb . given that the timescale for core helium burning is much longer than the timescale to evolve on the agb then stars in the former stage of evolution are the dominant population . the 160 and 240 myr isochrones pass through the main concentration of red sources that have m@xmath127 , indicating that the majority of these stars have progenitor masses @xmath128m@xmath7 . line blanketing affects the photometric properties of very red evolved stars at visible and red wavelengths , causing the most luminous portions of the agb at moderate and higher metallicities to bow over on the @xmath95 cmds ( e.g. bica et al . this is evident in figure 9 , as the 160 myr isochrone plunges to fainter m@xmath129 when @xmath130 . the most luminous portions of the agb are almost certainly missing from these cmds , and so identifying the agb - tip is problematic . the color distributions of stars can be used to investigate field - to - field variations in the recent sfh in a purely empirical manner . the @xmath126 histogram distributions of sources in three r@xmath2 intervals with m@xmath129 between 4 and 3 , which corresponds to @xmath54 between 20.9 and 21.9 based on the apparent @xmath54 distance modulus , are compared in figure 10 . comparisons with isochrones in figure 9 indicate that the blue peak is populated by stars with ages @xmath105 myr , while the red peak contains stars with ages between 60 and 200 myr . the number counts in each radial interval have been corrected statistically for foreground and background contamination using source counts in areas that are external to outer disk 2 . these control fields , the location of which are indicated in figure 1 , were examined by eye to ensure that they do not contain obvious concentrations of young stars . the control fields almost certainly contain some intermediate age stars that belong to m31 , and so the number counts in these areas may ( slightly ) overestimate the level of foreground and background contamination at the faint end . that ring 10 has been an area of star - forming activity during the past 100 myr is clearly evident from the number of blue stars in the top panel of figure 10 . the mix of young stars ( i.e. those in the blue color peak ) to intermediate age stars ( i.e. those in the red color peak ) changes with radius , and these variations are explored in the lower panel of figure 10 , where the color distributions have been normalized according to the number of objects with @xmath126 between 0.25 and 0.25 . there is a wide dispersion in the relative amplitudes of the blue and red peaks . the ratio of red to blue objects in the inner disk is substantially larger than in either ring 10 or the middle disk , indicating that the sfh in this part of m31 was skewed to higher levels of activity 60 200 myr in the past . this is another manifestation of the pronounced red stellar concentrations that are seen in the hess diagrams of the inner disk in figures 5 and 8 . the sfh of the inner disk during intermediate epochs is re - visited in 6 . the blue sequence in the middle disk peaks at a bluer @xmath126 color than at smaller radii . a comparatively low reddening for the middle disk is probably not driving the peak color of blue stars , as there is not a corresponding shift in the color of the main sequence on the @xmath86 cmd ( 4.1 ) . rather , the trajectory of the isochrones on the @xmath95 plane makes the @xmath126 color distribution of blue stars more susceptible to variations in the recent sfh . the blue sequence will narrow as stars at the older end of the @xmath131 myr age range are removed , as these stars have redder colors than younger stars in a given magnitude interval this may not be accompanied by a skewing of the color distribution of red stars , as these objects span a much larger range of ages than main sequence stars with the same m@xmath129 , and so their mean colors are less susceptible to variations in the sfh . as in our study of m33 ( davidge & puzia 2011 ) , we use the @xmath63 lf of blue stars to probe the sfh of the m31 disk . our @xmath63 photometry includes main sequence stars throughout much of the m31 disk with ages @xmath132 myr , allowing the sfh in this timeframe to be directly probed . the damping time for large scale star - forming activity in disks is @xmath133 years ( e.g. leitherer 2001 ) , and so elevated sfrs may linger for this time after they are initiated . therefore , inferences can be made into the more distant past than would otherwise be permitted from resolved stars . following davidge & puzia ( 2011 ) , lfs were constructed of sources with @xmath134 between 0.5 and 0.5 . the majority of objects in this color range are main sequence stars . while most foreground and background objects in the cmds have red colors , there are modest numbers of contaminants that fall within the color interval considered here . these include blue horizontal branch stars in the galactic halo , and star - forming regions in moderately distant spiral galaxies . we account for these statistically using number counts in portions of our megacam fields that are offset from the disk of m31 ( 4.3 ) . the mean lf in these control regions follows a power - law , and a characteristic exponent and zeropoint were determined by using the method of least squares to fit a power - law to this lf . this fitted relation was then subtracted from each of the observed lfs , after scaling to account for differences in angular coverage . the lfs of various radial intervals are compared in figure 11 . the number counts in the top panel are as observed on the sky , and these are given in units of counts arcmin@xmath78 per 0.5 magnitude interval in m@xmath135 . the @xmath8 dex offset between the middle and outer disk lfs is consistent with the walterbos & kennicutt ( 1987 ) surface brightness profile , as is the 0.5 dex ( i.e. 1.25 magnitude arcsec@xmath78 ) dispersion between the lfs with r@xmath2 in the range 5 - 15 kpc . this broad consistency between star counts and surface photometry is encouraging , and suggests that the bright blue stars detected in the megacam data are not affected by crowding . the lfs in the bottom panel of figure 11 have been normalized to match the ring 10 lf between m@xmath136 and 5.25 , thereby allowing the shapes of the lfs to be compared . the lfs follow power - laws , and the outer disk 2 lf is steeper than the rest . the mix of massive and intermediate mass stars in the outer disk thus differs from that in the inner disk . the lfs of the inner disk , ring 10 , and the middle disk in the lower panel of figure 11 are similar . this is perhaps surprising given the concentration of star - forming pockets in ring 10 ( 6 ) . however , it should be kept in mind that the lfs are azimuthal averages , and isolated star - forming pockets will only influence the mean lf if they occur in large numbers . in fact , while ring 10 and ring 14 contain areas of intense recent star formation , they do not stand out in the uv color profile measured by thilker et al . ( 2005 ) ; rather , the uv color stays roughly constant between 10 and 15 kpc . the comparisons in figure 11 indicate that the mix of young to intermediate age stars in ring 10 is not different from that in the inner or middle disks when averaged over large areas , the sfhs of these regions have been broadly similar during the past 100 200 myr . a comparison of the properties of bright main sequence stars in m31 and m33 provides a purely empirical means of assessing the relative star - forming activities of these galaxies during recent epochs . to be sure , star - forming activity in disk galaxies depends on a number of factors , such as environment and mass , and it would be of interest to compare the stellar content of m31 with that of other large galaxies of similar morphological type ; however , such datasets do not yet exist . differences in size and morphological type aside , m33 is an important comparison object as it is at roughly the same distance of m31 , and has been the subject of a number of investigations . the sfhs of m31 and m33 have probably also been coupled at some point in the past ( 1.3 ) . finally , the specific sfr ( ssfr ) of m33 is near the mid - point of spiral galaxies in general ( munoz - mateos et al . 2007 ) , making it a benchmark for activity in a ` typical ' star - forming galaxy . the m33 megacam dataset examined by davidge & puzia ( 2011 ) was recorded during observing conditions that were similar to those of the present m31 observations , and are adopted here for comparisons with m31 . main sequence stars with ages @xmath137 myr are traced throughout much of m33 ( davidge & puzia 2011 ) and m31 ( 3 ) , and these stars provide a direct means of comparing the sfrs of these galaxies . davidge & puzia ( 2011 ) found 3000 massive main sequence stars and bsgs in m33 with ages @xmath138 myr . applying the m33 selection criteria of m@xmath139 to the current data , we find that there are @xmath140 similar objects in m31 . the sfr in m31 during the past 10 myr has thus been one third that of m33 . for comparison , the integrated h@xmath35 luminosities of m31 and m33 are comparable ( e.g. kennicutt et al . 2008 ) , while m31 has a slightly higher fir flux than m33 ( rice et al . 1988 ) . the ssfr is a measure of the rate at which stellar mass grows due to star formation . the bulk of the @xmath141band light from most galaxies has its origins in old and intermediate age stars , and so integrated @xmath141band brightness serves as a crude proxy for total stellar mass . adopting the apparent @xmath142 magnitudes of m31 and m33 from jarrett et al . ( 2003 ) and a distance modulus of 24.92 for m33 ( bonanos et al . 2006 ) , then the integrated total brightnesses of these galaxies are m@xmath143 ( m31 ) and m@xmath144 ( m33 ) . based on the numbers of blue stars with ages @xmath138 myr ( see above ) and their integrated @xmath141band brightnesses , then the ssfr of m31 is only @xmath145 that of m33 . the difference between the ssfrs of m31 and m33 is almost certainly greater than this , as it has been assumed that m31 and m33 have identical @xmath141band mass - to - light ratios ( m / l@xmath146 ) . in actual fact , given the higher relative fraction of young stars in m33 , then the m / l@xmath146 of m33 is probably lower than that of m31 . m / l ratios at a given age depend on metallicity , although for effective ages @xmath147 years the differences between the m / l ratios predicted by z = 0.02 and z = 0.008 models are miniscule ( e.g. figure 4 of mouhcine & lancon 2003 ) . minor differences in the relative m / l ratios of these galaxies notwithstanding , it is clear that m31 is practically dead in terms of recent star - forming activity when compared with m33 . the m31 and m33 lfs , normalized in the interval m@xmath148 4 to 5 , are compared in figure 12 . the m33 lf is that of objects with r@xmath2 between 6 and 8 kpc from davidge & puzia ( 2011 ) . the lf of sources in this part of the galaxy is representative of the main body of the m33 disk . there are conspicuous differences between the m31 and m33 lfs in figure 12 . these differences are likely not a result of differences in metallicity between stars in the disks of m31 and m33 . while model lfs of blue sources with z = 0.019 and z = 0.008 do differ , the differences are largely restricted to m@xmath149 . this magnitude regime is dominated by bsgs , the properties of which are affected by metallicity - dependent mass loss rates . when m@xmath150 main sequence stars dominate , and the model lfs of blue sources show only slight differences . when compared with the m33 disk , outer disk 1 has a lower number of stars with ages of a few tens of myr with respect to stars that formed a few hundred myr in the past . when compared with the m31 lfs , the m33 lf is also deficient in stars with m@xmath135 between 2 and 4 , which is a m@xmath135 range that corresponds to msto ages of 40 100 myr . davidge & puzia ( 2011 ) found that the lf of bright main sequence stars that formed during the past few hundred myr in m33 is well matched by a constant sfr ( csfr ) model , and the comparisons in figure 12 indicate that such a sfh does not hold for m31 . the sfh of the m31 disk is examined in more detail in the next section . we use a forward modelling approach , in which model lfs are constructed for pre - defined sfhs and are then compared with the observations . models were generated from the z = 0.019 girardi et al . ( 2004 ) isochrones using routines in the starfish package ( harris & zaritsky 2001 ) . the models assume an imf power - law index @xmath151 , which kroupa et al . ( 2003 ) find holds for massive stars . models with a salpeter ( 1955 ) imf differ only slightly from those used here ( e.g. figure 11 of davidge & puzia 2011 ) . the @xmath63 lf of main sequence stars provides a relatively robust means of investigating sfhs , as the main sequence is probably the best understood phase of stellar evolution . still , there is an incomplete understanding of the physical processes that affect the structure and evolution of massive main sequence stars . these include uncertainties in convection , which is the dominant mode of energy transport in the central regions of massive stars , mass loss , and rotation . while these uncertainties affect the post - zams models of massive stars , it is encouraging that the zams and tams loci predicted by the isochrones match the blue and red envelopes of the main sequence on the cmds ( 4 ) . statistical studies of main sequence stars are susceptible to uncertainties in the properties of close companions , which are not resolved at the distance of m31 . these uncertainties are not an issue for statistical studies of evolved stars , as the light from the most evolved star in a close stellar system swamps that from less evolved companions at visible wavelengths . however , if all the stars in a close system are on the main sequence then depending on the mass ratio companions may contribute a significant fraction of the total system light . while many of the sources in our data are unresolved systems , if the statistical properties of these systems ( e.g. the frequency of binary or higher - order systems , the mass ratio of components , etc ) do not change with the mass of the primary then the main sequence lf will still yield useful information for a differential examination of the sfh . the megacam data sample stars in a wide range of evolutionary states , all of which provide information about the sfh of m31 . however , combining information from different evolutionary states to investigate the sfh may lead to complications when interpreting the results , as the dominant sources of uncertainties in the input model physics vary with evolutionary phase . comparisons of the sfhs of galaxies at different distances may be most prone to uncertainties related to evolutionary state , as the sfhs may be based on objects in very different stages of evolution . gogarten et al . ( 2010 ) suggest that this may be a factor when comparing the sfhs of m33 and ngc 300 . the impact of uncertainties in models of the most advanced stages of stellar evolution on sfhs has been investigated by melbourne et al . ( 2010 ) , who compute separate sfhs for a dwarf galaxy using main sequence stars and agb stars . the two sfhs differ substantially , and melbourne et al . ( 2010 ) attribute this difference to an incomplete empirical calibration of the agb models , which rely heavily on the lmc and smc as benchmarks . the models used here assume a fixed metallicity , and so do not account for metallicity evolution . while the mean metallicity of a disk grows with time as material that is processed in stars is recycled into the ism , a fixed metallicity is appropriate given that our models cover a time span that is short when compared with the enrichment timescale of a disk . indeed , the age - metallicity relation of the solar neighborhood during recent epochs has a shallow slope ( e.g. edvardsson et al . 1993 ) , and the rate of metallicity evolution in m31 will be even more subdued than this given the lower sfr . the most basic sfh model is that of a simple stellar population ( ssp ) , in which all stars have the same age and metallicity ; ssp lfs are also the building blocks from which lfs that track more elaborate sfhs are constructed . because galaxies are composite stellar systems , it is unlikely that their lfs will be well matched by ssp models . still , if a galaxy experiences a single large episode of star formation that is caught early in its evolution then the lf of the brightest stars may follow that of an ssp . the @xmath63 lfs of main sequence stars in three radial intervals are compared with a log(t@xmath152 ssp model lf in figure 13 . the ring 10 lf is similar to that of the inner and middle disk regions ( figure 11 ) , and so comparisons with models are restricted to the four intervals shown in figure 13 . m31 is a composite stellar system , and so it is not surprising that there is poor agreement between the model ssp lf and the observations . still , the ring 10 lf , which samples a region with a high concentration of recent star formation , has an exponent that comes closest to matching that of the ssp model . the sfhs of isolated , passively evolving disks may be affected by stochastic effects , with spikes in star - forming activity due to events such as the passage of spiral arms and the propagation of density waves from sne in young clusters and associations . evidence for variations in the sfh of the solar neighborhood due to the passage of spiral arms has been found by hernandez et al . nevertheless , the impact of stochastic events will average out when considered over long timespans and large areas , and the sfhs of passively evolving disks might be expected to come close to that of a csfr . the @xmath63 lfs are compared with csfr models in figure 14 , and there is much better agreement with the observations than in figure 13 . in fact , the csfr model provides a reasonable match to the outer disk 2 lf , and is a fair representation of the outer disk 1 lf . still , with the exception of the outer disk 2 lf , the csfr model lfs in figure 14 tend to be steeper than the observed lfs . indeed , while the csfr model is a reasonable match to the outer disk 1 observations with m@xmath153 , which corresponds to msto ages @xmath154 myr , it underestimates the number of stars at the bright end . these differences are even more evident when the ring 10 and ring 14 lfs are compared with the csfr model . given the differences between the observations and models in figure 14 , we investigated sfhs in which the sfr during the past 10 myr has increased with respect to that expected for a csfr at earlier epochs . models were generated in which the recent sfr was increased by various amounts , and the results were compared with the observed lfs ; the best matches , selected by eye , are shown in figure 15 . also shown in each panel is b@xmath155 , which is the ratio of the number of stars that formed within the past 10 myr to the number that formed in the interval 10 100 myr . the outer disk 2 lf is not shown in figure 15 , as it is represented adequately by the csfr model . models with elevated recent star - forming activity better match the lfs of the three regions shown in figure 15 than the csfr models . higher recent sfrs are required to match the ring 10 and ring 14 lfs than is required to match the outer disk 1 lf . while this is consistent with ring 10 and 14 being areas of comparatively intense recent star - forming activity , if elevated levels of recent star formation occur in only part of outer disk 1 ( i.e. at the smallest r@xmath2 in this region ) then the effect of any recent increase in the sfr will be diluted . the differences in the amplitude of recent star - forming activity aside , it is clear that the recent upswing in star - forming activity has not been restricted to ring 10 and 14 , but occured over a large fraction of the disk the change in the recent sfr is not a localized phenomenon that is restricted to only a small part of the m31 disk , but is more global in nature . the spatial distribution of stars in a known age range is an important probe of galaxy evolution . samples of young main sequence stars ( yms ; ages @xmath137 myr ) and intermediate - age main sequence stars ( ims ; ages @xmath5 myr ) were selected from the megacam data based on their location in the @xmath86 cmd . the boundaries of the yms and ims regions in figure 16 were defined using isochrones as guides , while also keeping in mind the results of the artificial star and stacking experiments discussed in 3 . the distributions of objects in the yms and ims samples are shown in figures 17 ( as observed on - sky ) and 18 ( as would be observed face - on ) . the face - on distributions assume that the stars are in an infinitely thin , unwarped disk , and departures from these assumptions will cause blurring of structures in the de - projected distributions . some blurring is expected , as the gas disk of m31 is warped ( corbelli et al . 2010 ) . it is evident from figures 17 and 18 that ( 1 ) recent star - forming activity in m31 has not been uniformly distributed with azimuthal angle , and ( 2 ) knots of stars in both samples are seen throughout the disk . the stars in the yms sample tend to be tightly clustered and define partial arcs . the distribution of yms stars indicates that the most intense area of recent star formation was in the north east quadrant of the disk . there is broad agreement between the yms distribution and images of uv ( figure 1 of thilker et al . 2005 ) and mir ( figure 1 of gordon et al . 2006 ) emission . while peaks in hi emission shown in figure 1 of unwin ( 1983 ) coincide with areas of high yms density in ring 10 , at radii @xmath156 arcmin ( r@xmath157 kpc ) there are collections of yms stars with no corresponding hi feature . in contrast , there is much better agreement between the location of yms concentrations and the peaks in co ( 10 ) emission mapped by nieten et al . ( 2006 ) . stars in the yms sample are seen at moderately small r@xmath2 . large - scale , well - defined structures that contain bright blue stars are seen near 20 arcmin ( i.e. r@xmath158 kpc ) , while individual objects in the yms sample are detected to within 10 arcmin ( r@xmath84 kpc ) of the nucleus . this r@xmath2 is where the bulge and disk contribute comparable amounts of light at visible wavelengths ( e.g. tempel et al . 2011 ) , and is where the fuv nuv color in the main body of the galaxy is reddest ( thilker et al . 2005 ) . ring structures are much more pronounced in the ims distribution than in the yms distribution . the ims sample contains stars that formed over a wider range of ages than the yms stars , and so the effects of spatial fluctuations in star - forming activity are expected to average out . the more - or - less uniform azimuthal distribution of ims objects in the rings suggests that the location of star formation in the immediate past differed from the present day , and that areas of active star formation in the rings have moved through a wide range of position angles within m31 . that ring 10 is seen in samples of objects that are as old as 100 myr indicates that the event that spurred its formation must have occured at least 100 myr ago . in fact , it is somewhat surprising that rings and arcs are present at all in the ims sample , given the rate at which stars in the disks of nearby star - forming galaxies acquire random velocities with time as they interact with giant molecular clouds ( gmcs ) . the velocities acquired in this manner can cause disk stars to move substantial distances over timespans of 100 myr . for example , spiral structure in m33 is well - defined by stars with ages @xmath138 myr , but is not apparent in the distribution of stars with ages of 100 myr ( davidge & puzia 2011 ) . the presence of organized structures in the disk of m31 that are defined by objects in the ims sample suggests that stars in these parts of m31 do not attain the same random motions as their counterparts in m33 . the narrow distribution of orbital angular momentum that is expected for star - forming material in rings undoubtedly contributes to restricting the time evolution of random velocities among stars in these structures . a sample of rheb@xmath159agb stars has been selected using the boundaries indicated on the @xmath95 cmd in figure 16 . the objects in this part of the cmd formed 60 200 myr in the past , and so probe earlier epochs than the ims sample . the faint limit of the extraction region in figure 16 reflects the results of the data characterization experiments discussed in 3 . the face - on distribution of objects in the rheb@xmath159agb sample is shown in figure 19 . the distribution observed on the sky is not shown , as the density of red sources makes it difficult to detect structure because of the orientation of m31 on the sky . as in figure 18 , the major axis of m31 points upwards . the concentration near ( dx , dy ) = ( 60,20 ) is centered on m32 ; the dense central regions of m32 where stars are not resolved appears as a hole in the rheb@xmath159agb distribution . the concentration near ( dx , dy ) = ( 100 , 0 ) is probably associated with ngc 205 ( see figure 1 ) . the distribution of rheb@xmath159agb stars in figure 19 is asymmetric about the horizontal axis , in the sense that the stellar density above and to the left of the galaxy center ( i.e. along the north east arm of the semi - major axis ) is higher than that below the galaxy center . there are also asymmetries to the left and right of the galaxy center , which fall along the minor axis . however , the orientation of m31 on the sky is such that the distribution of objects along the minor axis is more prone to uncertainties arising from for example the inherent thickness of the disk and the presence of stars in the bulge of m31 , both of which may affect the de - projected stellar distribution . we thus focus on the asymmetry along the major axis , where the de - projected distribution is most secure . number counts in an 8 arcmin wide strip along the north east and south west segments of the major axis are shown in figure 20 . the density of rheb@xmath159agb stars along the ne axis within 50 arcmin ( @xmath3 kpc ) of the galaxy center is higher than along the sw axis . at @xmath160 arcmin these stars have a density that is 0.4 dex higher on the ne axis than at the same point on the sw axis . this suggests that the north east part of the galaxy was an area of more intense star - forming activity @xmath161 myr in the past than the south west part . persistent large scale concentrations of elevated star - forming activity are seen in other nearby disk galaxies , such as ngc 253 ( davidge 2010 ) . the number counts of objects in the ims sample are also shown in figure 20 , and it is evident that the ims and rheb@xmath159agb samples have very different radial distributions . star - forming rings form a 5 kpc periodicity in the distribution of ims stars , and these structures are most pronounced along the ne axis . the rings have an amplitude of @xmath8 dex in the ims counts . the red stars show more gradual variations with radius , and there is little or no correlation with features in the ims distribution . departures from large scale trends in the rheb@xmath159agb distribution are substantially smaller than those in the ims distribution , amounting to @xmath98 dex . in addition to the periodic nature of structure in the radial distribution of ims stars , there is also a systematic gradient in the relative numbers of rheb@xmath159agb and ims stars . this is investigated in the lower panel of figure 20 , where the ratio of objects in the two samples is shown . there is a tendency for the numbers of rheb@xmath159agb and ims sources to become more equal towards larger r@xmath2 , indicating that star formation was more centrally concentrated in m31 during intermediate epochs than at present . this trend is most noticeable when considering sources along the ne axis ; while a gradient is seen out to r@xmath162 kpc along the sw axis , it may reverse at larger radii . we note that the fuv nuv color in m31 decreases ( i.e. becomes bluer ) towards larger radii in the inner disk when r@xmath163 kpc ( thilker et al . 2005 ) , and this is broadly consistent with the relative radial distributions of the rheb@xmath159agb and ims objects in our data . the change in uv color in the interval r@xmath164 kpc corresponds to a change in luminosity - weighted ssp age from @xmath165 myr to 290 myr ( thilker et al . 2005 ) . ferguson et al . ( 2002 ) investigate the distribution of rgb and agb stars in the outer regions of the m31 disk . their study intentionally avoids the main body of the disk where crowding is an issue for their aperture photometry measurements , and so there is only modest spatial overlap between our megacam and the ferguson et al . ( 2002 ) datasets . still , we note that figure 2 of ferguson et al . ( 2002 ) shows filamentary structure at large radii . while contamination from background galaxies accounts for a progressively larger fraction of the objects in figure 19 as one moves to larger r@xmath2 , there are hints of structures at large r@xmath2 in figure 19 . these will prove to be promising targets for future deep photometric studies . images obtained with the cfht megacam of the local group galaxy m31 have been used to examine the spatial distribution and photometric properties of the brightest stars in this system . m31 is an important target for studies of galaxy evolution not only because it is the closest external large disk galaxy , but also because it has anemic star - forming activity at the present day , and is the nearest example of a red disk that is evolving in the so - called ` green valley ' . with four megacam pointings we cover most of the m31 disk out to 100 arcmin ( r@xmath166 kpc ) along the major axis , allowing us to investigate large - scale trends in stellar content . the primary goals of our study are ( 1 ) to probe the sfh of m31 during the past few hundred myr , and ( 2 ) to search for evidence of recent interactions . when considered alongside studies of the outer regions and bulge of m31 , which have yielded insights into the evolution of the galaxy during early and intermediate epochs , the results of the current work help to develop an understanding of the evolution of m31 in the context of other nearby galaxies . m31 has been subjected to interactions with companions ( e.g. 1 ) , and this activity has continued to cosmologically recent epochs . these interactions have influenced the large scale re - distribution of stars and gas , and have had a major influence on the sfh of the galaxy . in the remainder of this section we discuss our four principal results : ( 1 ) the nature of the sfh during the past 100 myr , focusing on the apparent rise in the sfr over the last @xmath3 myr that has occured throughout much of the galaxy , ( 2 ) the spatial distribution of stars that formed 10 100 myr in the past , ( 3 ) the distribution of evolved red stars that formed @xmath167 myr ago , and ( 4 ) the subdued level of star - forming activity at the present day , and the evolutionary status of m31 . stellar density changes with location in m31 , and this affects the spatial coverage of the stellar samples used here to probe the sfh . because they are among the brightest stars in the galaxy , and have relatively blue colors when compared with the underlying disk , main sequence stars with ages @xmath3 myr are detected over a large fraction of the m31 disk . while resolving fainter stars is more challenging , main sequence stars with ages @xmath5 myr are still detected at r@xmath168 a few kpc in our data . the recent ( i.e. within a hundred myr ) sfh can thus be investigated over much of the m31 disk . the @xmath63 lf of main sequence stars are indicative of a constant sfr during the past 10 100 myr , and so suggest that any major disturbance to the disk of m31 during intermediate epochs probably occured more than @xmath169 myr in the past . however , the number counts of the brightest main sequence stars indicate that the sfr has increased by a factor of @xmath170 during the past @xmath3 myr . that this upturn in the sfr was not restricted to ring 10 and ring 14 , which are the areas of m31 that contain a large fraction of its young stars and star - forming material , indicates that the trigger was an event that spurred activity throughout the disk , and is probably not stochastic in nature . a rise in star - forming activity during the past 10 myr is not seen at r@xmath0 kpc , and this provides clues into the nature of any event that may have triggered the change in the sfr . if the sfr was elevated by an interaction with a companion , then the point of closest encounter between m31 and this companion would have been r@xmath90 kpc ( e.g. hopkins et al . 2009 ) . if the companion passed through the disk plane then the point of impact must then have been in the present - day star - forming disk . gordon et al . ( 2006 ) models an interaction with m32 , in which that galaxy passed through the inner disk of m31 roughly 20 myr ago . the timing of that event is not very different from our estimate of a recent upswing in the disk sfr . large scale spiral structure is often associated with recent interactions . if m32 ( or another companion ) passed through the disk of m31 in the recent past then why is there no large scale spiral structure ? the amplitude of any spiral pattern depends on the mass of the perturber and the cold gas content of the larger galaxy . in addition , interactions may spur spiral structure only over limited areas , and even then these will survive only over dynamical time scales ( revaz et al . 2009 ) . if m31 was depleted of cold gas or the cold gas distribution was disrupted prior to the most recent interaction with a companion , then prominent spiral structure may not be expected . the sfh measured from the megacam images is broadly consistent with that presented by williams ( 2002 ; 2003 ) . williams ( 2002 ) examined a suite of hst / wfpc2 images to investigate the sfhs of the m31 disk and its environs . given the widely distributed locations of these fields , coupled with hst / wfpc2 s modest science field , it is perhaps not surprising that there is a substantial field - to - field dispersion in the sfhs found from these data . still , the sfhs for the majority of his fields are consistent with a csfr during the past few hundred myr , in agreement with the sfh deduced from the megacam @xmath63 lfs of main sequence stars during the time interval 10 100 myr . not all of the hst / wfpc2 fields show evidence of an upturn in the sfr within the past 10 20 myr . this is perhaps not surprising , as the distribution of young stars , uv light , mir emission , and molecular material all indicate that the recent rise in star - forming activity occured in isolated areas that are distributed throughout the disk . the sfhs deduced from the megacam data are based on stellar content that covers substantial swaths of the m31 disk . the sampling of small star - forming areas by the substantially smaller hst / wfpc2 field will be less complete . williams ( 2003 ) used wide - field ground - based images that cover a total area of 1.4 degrees@xmath36 to probe the recent sfh of the m31 disk . the level of star - forming activity was found to decline by 50% from @xmath171 myr to @xmath172 myr in the past , although the sfr during the past 64 myr is steady to within @xmath173 m@xmath7 year@xmath20 , thereby approximating a csfr to within @xmath174 . the sfr was also found to increase during the past 25 myr , in broad agreement with the results found here . the qualitative agreement with the williams ( 2003 ) results are significant , as williams examined a much smaller portion of the disk , and used a cmd - fitting technique that relies on stars spanning a range of evolutionary states , in contrast to our study which is based on main sequence stars . [ [ signatures - of - recent - interactions - characterizing - coherent - structures - in - the - disk - of - m31 ] ] signatures of recent interactions : characterizing coherent structures in the disk of m31 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ many bright main sequence stars in m31 are found in ring- and shell - like structures . these rings have a radial periodicity of @xmath175 kpc and based on main sequence stars that formed within the past 100 myr a stellar density that is an order of magnitude higher than in the inter - ring regions ( figure 20 ) . such a distribution of young stars indicates that much of the cool gas in m31 has been displaced systematically throughout m31 , as is evident in the distribution of hi and molecular material ( e.g. emerson 1974 ; nieten et al . 2006 ) . the distribution of objects in the ims sample indicates that the rings have been in place ( and forming stars ) for at least @xmath5 myr . gmcs in the disks of ` normal ' star - forming galaxies play a key role in kinematically heating stars over time spans of a few tens of myr . the modest physical width of the rings in m31 ( @xmath176 kpc ; figure 20 ) suggests that the orbital angular momenta of gmcs in these rings must have a compact distribution , reducing the incidence of collisions and thus contributing to the longevity of these structures . the ims sample contains main - sequence stars that formed over the entirety of the past @xmath5 myr , and this might skew age estimates . still , the majority of objects in the ims sample likely have ages that are not much younger than 100 myr . indeed , there has been on - going star formation throughout the disk of m31 during the past 100 myr ( 5 ) , which proceeded at a pace that is consistent with a csfr for @xmath177 myr . given this sfh and the relation between age and msto magnitude , then the majority of objects in the ims sample will likely have ages that are weighted towards the older , as opposed to younger , end of the age range covered by the part of the @xmath178 cmd that contains ims stars . interactions can produce the ring - like distribution of young stars in the m31 disk . hammer et al . ( 2010 ) find that a gas ring forms in models in which m31 merges with a large companion on a polar orbit . block et al . ( 2006 ) discuss a model in which a companion passed through the central regions of m31 @xmath179 myr ago . a propagating density wave , similar to that in the cartwheel galaxy , then triggers star formation as it works its way outwards . block et al ( 2006 ) suggest that the companion that spurred this event was m32 , accompanied by a massive halo to enhance the strength of the interaction . however , the orbit that they assign to m32 , together with its velocity , places it behind m31 , whereas there is strong evidence that m32 lies in front ( ford et al . 1978 ) . in any event , the spatial pattern of the ims sample argues against this model . rather than commencing at its current location only within the last 10 myr or so , we find that the star formation in ring 10 has existed for at least 100 myr . the existence of similar long - lived star - forming structures outside ring 10 , such as ring 14 , is further evidence against a propagating wave origin for ring 10 . in order to have a csfr during the past @xmath5 myr , it is likely that the last major interaction between m31 and a companion occured at least @xmath180 myr in the past . this leads us to speculate that the displacement of cool gas into rings may be an artifact of the event that triggered the last major upswing in star - forming activity 1 2 gyr ago . the event that produced this rise in star - forming activity undoubtedly affected the ism of m31 given the large population of globular clusters that formed at this time ( puzia et al . 2005 ) . hammer et al . ( 2010 ) argue that the 10 kpc ring may have resulted from a merger between m31 and a large companion more than 5 gyr ago . there are other possible perturbers : m33 is one , while another is m32 ( or its progenitor ) . m32 is of interest as it contains a substantial population of stars with an age of a few billion years ( e.g. davidge 1990b ; davidge 2000 ; del burgo et al . 2001 ; worthey 2004 ; rose et al . 2005 ) that are uniformly distributed throughout the galaxy ( davidge & jensen 2007 ) . the properties of m32 are also consistent with it having been sculpted by interactions . compact elliptical galaxies like m32 are associated with dense environments , and there is evidence that the morphology of m32 may have changed dramatically with time . indeed , remnants of a fossil disk have been detected around m32 ( graham 2002 ; choi et al . 2002 ) , suggesting that the present - day galaxy started out as a much larger disk system . m32 also lacks an entourage of globular clusters , as well as interstellar gas ( sage et al . 1998 ) and dust ( gordon et al . 2006 ) . these components may have been removed if m32 was subjected to tidal stripping . the total mass of m32 is only @xmath181 that of m31 , raising the question if it would be large enough to influence star formation in m31 , although if it interacted with m31 then its initial mass was probably larger than at the present day . simulations suggest that satellites with masses that are 10% of the larger system can significantly affect disk properties ( mori & rich 2008 ; qu et al . 2011 ) . the events that re - distributed gas and spurred elevated levels of star formation may leave signatures near the disk boundary . mergers are expected to move the boundaries of stellar disks outwards ( e.g. younger et al . 2007 ; cook et al . 2009 ) , as gas that loses angular momentum and moves inwards scatters stars to larger radii , pushing out the radial extent of the disk . in fact , an extended disk is observed in m31 ( e.g. ferguson & johnson 2001 ) , and is traced out to @xmath182 kpc ( ibata et al . the outer regions of the disk account for 10% of the total m31 disk luminosity ( ibata et al . 2005 ) , indicating that it is a significant structural component . ferguson & johnson ( 2001 ) also conclude that the majority of stars in the outer disk have ages in excess of a gyr , which is consistent with a population of stars that were displaced outward during the event that produced the population of intermediate age globular clusters . in contrast , ibata et al . ( 2005 ) and pearrubia et al . ( 2006 ) argue that this part of the disk is the product of satellite accretion , rather than the re - configuring of the orbits of stars that originated at smaller radii . [ [ signatures - of - recent - interactions - the - asymmetric - distribution - of - evolved - red - stars ] ] signatures of recent interactions : the asymmetric distribution of evolved red stars ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ lop - sided structure in galaxies is not rare ( e.g. zaritsky & rix 1997 ) , and may be a signature of the large - scale radial movement of gas in disks ( e.g. reichard et al . 2009 ) , or the non - uniform accretion of cosmic gas ( bournaud et al . 2005 ) . the projected density of rheb@xmath159agb stars with r@xmath157 kpc along the ne segment of the major axis is roughly two times that along the sw segment . given that these stars have ages 100 200 myr , then the lop - sided distribution was likely spurred by an event that occured within the past @xmath11 0.5 gyr . such a time scale would allow an elevated sfr to die down so that a csfr could be seen in the time interval probed by the @xmath63 lf of main sequence stars in the inner disk . the asymmetric distribution of rheb@xmath159agb stars is consistent with other observations . williams ( 2003 ) found that the region @xmath183 arcmin of the north east of the galaxy center was an area of enhanced star - forming activity 64 256 myr in the past . in addition , circumstellar envelopes around massive agb stars contribute significantly to the mir light from systems containing stars that formed within the past few gyr . the [ 5.8 ] and [ 8.0 ] major axis profiles of m31 shown in figure 2 of barmby et al . ( 2006 ) have higher levels of emission between @xmath184 and 1800 arcsec ( 13 30 arcmin ) along the ne major axis segment than the corresponding section of the sw segment . finally , davidge ( 2012 ) examined 2mass images and discovered a substantial concentration of agb stars @xmath185 kpc ne of the center of m31 . this structure is populated by stars with ages in excess of 100 myr . the presence of a large - scale asymmetry in the distribution of stars with ages 100 - 200 myr is perhaps surprising given that rotational shear might be expected to blur such structures . however , shear will not be an issue for stars at radii where the disk kinematics follow solid body rotation . while rotation curves derived from hi suggest that significant shear might be expected even in the inner regions of m31 ( e.g. braun 1991 ) , the gas dynamics at small radii may not reflect those of objects in the stellar disk ( e.g. kent 1989a ) . still , there is agreement between the rotational properties of m31 defined by hi and pne at r@xmath186 kpc ( halliday et al . 2006 ) , and the rotation velocity measured from hii regions drops near 25 30 armin ( r@xmath187 kpc ; kent 1989b ) . for comparison , the asymmetry in the rheb@xmath159agb number counts disappears when r@xmath188 kpc . kinematic measurements of bright agb stars in the inner disk of m31 will help establish if they are in the disk plane . such measurements could be made in the @xmath141band , where the brightest agb stars in m31 have @xmath189 and significant gains in angular resolution can be realised with adaptive optics systems . the event that produced the asymmetric distribution of rheb@xmath159agb stars may have left signatures in the extraplanar regions if it involved an encounter with a satellite . the gss , which mori & rich ( 2008 ) model as the result of a moderate mass companion passing through the m31 disk , is one candidate signature of such an event . fardal et al . ( 2007 ) find a kinematic age for the gss of 750 myr , which is a few hundred myr older than the rheb@xmath159agb stars examined here . the dwarf elliptical galaxy ngc 205 is one of the largest companions of m31 , and has a projected distance of only @xmath3 kpc from the center of m31 . twisting of the outer isophotes of ngc 205 is consistent with tidal disruption ( choi et al . there is evidence in the resolved stellar content of ngc 205 for a large episode of star formation @xmath5 myr in the past , and another a few hundred myr before that ( davidge 2003 ) . the timing of the first event coincides with the last m31 disk - crossing predicted by cepa & beckman ( 1988 ) , while the second is consistent with their period of ngc 205 about m31 . the second star - forming episode is also consistent with the timing of the event that may have produced the lop - sided distribution of rheb@xmath159agb stars in m31 . howley et al . ( 2008 ) have re - examined the orbital properties of ngc 205 and suggest that it might be on its first passage by m31 , counter to the orbit proposed by cepa & beckman ( 1988 ) . if ngc 205 has interacted with m31 then a tidal tail would be expected , and mcconnachie et al . ( 2005 ) report the possible detection of such a structure . given that there is no consensus or firm evidence on the orbit of ngc 205 about m31 then the connection between this satellite and the larger galaxy must remain speculative for now . photometric surveys of galaxies reveal distinct red and blue sequences on cmds ( e.g. strateva et al . 2001 ; bell et al . the majority of objects in the blue sequence are disk - dominated , while the majority of objects in the red sequence are spheroid - dominated ( strateva et al . mutch et al . ( 2011 ) examine the morphology and integrated colors of m31 , and conclude that it is currently in the ` green valley ' that falls between the blue and red sequences . they also conclude that at least one in six nearby disk galaxies , including the galaxy , lie in the green valley or on the red sequence . if the sfr of m31 has recently increased by a factor of @xmath170 , then the appearance of m31 @xmath5 myr in the past m31 would have been different from the present day . if the current sfr is one third that of m33 , for which the sfr is 0.5 0.7 m@xmath7 year@xmath20 ( hippelein et al . 2003 ; verley et al . 2009 ) , then the sfr in m31 would have been only 0.1 m@xmath7 year@xmath20 a hundred myr ago . when considered in the context of star - forming activity , m31 at that time would have appeared as a largely dead system . the ssfr in m31 is similar to that in nearby red disk galaxies , such as the lenticular galaxy ngc 5102 . using the integrated @xmath141band brightnesses of m31 and ngc 5102 from jarrett et al . ( 2003 ) as proxies for computing relative stellar masses , and assuming a sfr of @xmath190 m@xmath7 year@xmath20 for ngc 5102 ( davidge 2008 ) , then the ssfr of m31 100 myr ago would have been comparable to that of ngc 5102 at the present day . it is perhaps worth noting that m31 and ngc 5102 share common morphological properties . young stars in ngc 5102 have a ring - like distribution and the lop - sided distribution of agb stars in ngc 5102 ( figure 5 of davidge 2010 ) is reminiscent of the distribution of rheb@xmath159agb stars in m31 . bundy et al . ( 2010 ) examine the morphologies of red sequence galaxies , and find that a significant number are passively evolving disks where large - scale star formation has ceased . the red disk galaxies examined by bundy et al . ( 2010 ) tend to have more prominent bulges than blue , star - forming disk galaxies . red disk galaxies are found in a range of environments , suggesting that they are not the exclusive product of evolution in high density regions . the stellar archeology of m31 may provide clues into how red disk galaxies evolve in environments like the local group . star formation in galaxies is influenced by a number of factors , one of which is environment , and galaxies with companions tend to have high ssfrs ( li et al . the ssfr also depends on galaxy mass , in the sense that the ssfr at the present day rises as one moves to lower masses ( e.g. kauffmann et al . 2003 ) . bundy et al . ( 2010 ) suggest that star formation in red disks may have been halted by mergers and subsequent interactions . these events would have driven the rapid consumption of star - forming material , and ultimately contributed to the disruption of the cold ism . red sequence disks are expected to evolve into pressure - supported systems if they experience a major merger , as there is no cool gas from which a disk could re - form . to the extent that m31 can be considered to be a typical red disk galaxy , its past history appears to favor the ` two stage ' model forwarded by bundy et al . ( 2010 ) , in which a disk is first stripped of gas , and is then pummeled by other systems to produce a red galaxy that is supported mainly by random motions , rather than rotation . the final pressure - supported configuration of m31 may be realised a few gyr in the future , when it is projected to merge with the galaxy ( e.g. cox & abraham 2008 ) . barring an injection of cool gas into the m31 disk during the next few gyr , this merger will occur when m31 is gas poor and based on the present - day modest sfr contains a preponderance of stars with ages in excess of a few gyr . lcc field # & date observed & exposure times + & & ( seconds ) + 1 & sept 13 , 2010 & @xmath191 + & & @xmath192 + & & @xmath193 + & & + 2 & oct 31 , 2010 & @xmath194 + & & @xmath192 + & & @xmath193 + & & + 3 & nov 1 , 2010 & @xmath194 + & & @xmath192 + & & @xmath193 + & & + 4 & oct 30 , 2010 & @xmath191 + & & @xmath192 + & & @xmath193 + & & + rccc r@xmath2 & @xmath111 & @xmath113 & @xmath114 + 6 kpc & @xmath195 & @xmath196 & 0.6 + 8 kpc & @xmath197 & @xmath196 & 0.6 + 10 kpc & @xmath198 & @xmath199 & 1.0 + 12 kpc & @xmath200 & @xmath201 & 0.8 + 14 kpc & @xmath202 & @xmath203 & 0.4 + Abstract:
[ "we examine the star - forming history ( sfh ) of the m31 disk during the past few hundred myr . the luminosity functions ( lfs ) of main sequence stars at distances r@xmath0 kpc ( i.e. @xmath1 disk scale lengths ) are matched by models that assume a constant star formation rate ( sfr ) . however , at smaller r@xmath2 the lfs suggest that during the past @xmath3 myr the sfr was @xmath4 higher than during the preceding @xmath5 myr . the rings of cool gas that harbor a significant fraction of the current star - forming activity are traced by stars with ages @xmath5 myr , indicating that ( 1 ) these structures have ages of at least 100 myr , and ( 2 ) stars in these structures do not follow the same relation between age and random velocity as their counterparts throughout the disks of other spiral galaxies , probably due to the inherently narrow orbital angular momentum distribution of the giant molecular clouds in these structures . the distribution of evolved red stars is not azimuthally symmetric , in the sense that their projected density along the north east segment of the major axis is roughly twice that on the opposite side of the galaxy . the north east arm of the major axis thus appears to be a fossil star - forming area that dates to intermediate epochs . such a structure may be the consequence of interactions with a companion galaxy . = 1.0 cm" ]
20,059
20,059
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: seeing a quantum effect , and even making practical use of it , does not necessarily imply recognising it as such . magnetic compasses have been around for millenia , but quantum nature of ferromagnetism could not be understood till the discovery of the electron spin and the pauli principle . more than forty years elapsed between stewart s and kirchhoff s experiments with thermal radiation and planck s dissertation . already in the 20th century , it took three years for einstein to come up with a quantum explanation of lenard s experiments . clearly there must exist certain _ mathematical patterns _ in quantum equations of motion allowing one to look at the quantum without recognising it . an immediate reservation is in place here . this paper concerns , and is limited to , phase - space formulation of quantum electrodynamics based on the time - normal operator ordering @xcite . this is only one example in the multitude of analogies existing between the quantum and classical mechanics ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . our work should be kept distinct from attempts to modify quantum electrodynamics by making arbitrary physically motivated assumptions about properties of matter ( cf . @xcite ) , as well as from attempts to imitate quantum behaviour in classical stochastic electrodynamics ( cf . @xcite ) . another well established tradition is applying methods of quantum field theory to classical statistical mechanics @xcite . worth mentioning are also attempts to implement classical mechanics in the hilbert space , see @xcite and references therein . the result of this paper in a nutshell is that _ quantum electrodynamics and classical stochastic electrodynamics share their macroscopic dynamical structure . _ more specifically , all relations for generalised phase - space quasi - distributions @xcite we obtain in this paper lack planck s constant and , _ ipso facto _ , coincide with the corresponding relations of the classical stochastic electrodynamics for probability distributions . this lack of planck s constant is exactly the aforementioned mathematical pattern . one way of formulating our results is that truly quantum dynamics is limited to microscopic conditions of indistinguishability and/or equations of motion of matter . for purposes of this paper , _ macroscopic _ refers to electromagnetic interactions under conditions of distinguishability . etymologies aside , we associate `` macroscopic '' and `` microscopic '' with `` distinguishable '' and `` indistinguishable '' , and not with `` large '' and `` small '' . `` distinguishability '' has its standard meaning ( formalised as commutativity of relevant dynamical variables in the interaction picture ) . on the commonly used term _ mesoscopic _ see endnote @xcite ; we treat macroscopic and mesoscopic as synonyms . the logic of the paper revolves around two concepts : `` obscured macroscopic view '' and `` doing quantum electrodynamics while thinking classically '' . the former refers to a closed albeit , strictly speaking , phenomenological quantum dynamical framework confined to the electromagnetic field and current operators . the latter expresses the critical property of such framework : on rewriting it in the so - called _ response picture _ @xcite , planck s constant drops out . this is another manifestation of the said mathematical pattern . any relation within `` obscured macroscopic view '' may therefore be obtained by formal quantisation of its classical counterpart . we stress that `` obscured macroscopic view '' is not an approximation , nor is it a modification of conventional quantum mechanics . it is a _ voluntary limit _ we impose on information extracted from a microscopic theory . it does not impose any restrictions on the theory itself , except that it be consistent with conventional quantum electrodynamics . implications of these results , with a multitude of specifications and reservations , are discussed at length in the paper . here we allow ourselves only a brief comment so as to clarify our motivation . particulars aside , quantum measurement is interaction of classical apparata with a quantum system . nice as it may sound , this definition has two obvious problems . classical apparata in the strict meaning of the term do not exist in nature , and it is not at all clear which laws quantum or classical should govern such interaction . both problems disappear if we limit `` measurement '' to electromagnetic interaction of an observer e.g . , a human being with the rest of the world . `` obscured macroscopic view '' is a formal expression of limitations of such `` electromagnetic observer '' . the difference between the classical and the quantum for such observer is _ only _ in whether currents he / she sees may or may not be _ phenomenologically _ interpteted as stochastic c - numbers . if such interpretation happens to be possible for some macroscopic quantum system , the latter becomes phenomenologically indistinguishable from a classical system . we term such systems classically behaving . `` classical apparata '' are classically behaving quantum systems , i.e. , _ inherently quantum _ systems which _ appear classical _ to the observer . their interaction with other quantum systems is governed by laws of quantum electrodynamics , which in this case are structurally identical with classical electrodynamics . if all devices involved behave classically , the whole situation reverts to classical electrodynamics . in particular , the classical world we perceive in everyday life is a collection of classically behaving quantum systems . as we demonstrate in this paper , these leading considerations are fully justified by the formal structure of quantum electrodynamics . the goal of this paper is twofold . firstly , we extend the earlier analyses @xcite to distinguishable matter subsystems . we show that the _ formal _ response characterisation of a solitary electromagnetic device @xcite becomes its _ physical _ characterisation as a radiation scatterer were this device interacting electromagneticaly with other macroscopic devices . this proves overall physical consistency of the response viewpoint . secondly , we establish the connection between our approach and the conventional phase - space techniques , making all results , the old as well as the new , intuitive . to this end we reformulate everything in terms of _ conditional p - functionals _ @xcite ; these quantities generalise both _ conditional probability distributions _ of classical stochastics and _ quasiprobability distributions _ of the conventional phase - space techniques , to arbitrary nonlinear non - markovian bosonic quantum systems . our analyses imply generalisation of the conventional phase - space techniques , firstly , beyond the resonance , or rotating wave , approximation ( rwa ) , and , secondly , to quantum response problems . coherent states of the harmonic oscillator , which traditionally serve as an entry point to phase - space approaches , were introduced by schrdinger as early as 1926 @xcite . that quantum dynamics of free bosonic systems maps to classical dynamics irrespective of the quantum state was firstly noticed by feynman in his review on path integrals @xcite . this understanding was instrumental in developing quantum theory of photodetection by glauber @xcite . glauber s theory was initially formulated for free electromagnetic fields , then extended to interacting fields by kelley and kleiner @xcite . however , de haan @xcite and later bykov and tatarskii @xcite pointed out that kelley - kleiner s results are limited to the rwa . taking them outside the rwa leads to causality violations ( we associate causality with retardation , cf . also endnote @xcite ) . lifting this restriction by amending the glauber - kelley - kleiner definition is one of the key results of . the critical generalisation is inclusion of response . it establishes a link to a host of powerful ideas , notably , to the real - time quantum field theory , schwinger - perel - keldysh s closed - time - loop formalism @xcite , and , last but not least , to relativistic quantum field theory @xcite . ( this link was a subject of @xcite . ) from a physical perspective , it allows one to make propagation of quantum signals in space - time the guiding principle of the whole investigation . in particular , propagation of the electromagnetic field underlies the aforementioned amendment of the concept of time - normal ordering . it also reveals the inherent link between operator noncommutativity and response @xcite . the pivotal formal point of these analyses is that the description of a quantum system in terms of time - normal averages of heisenberg operators conditional on external sources turns out to be equivalent to the closed - time - loop framework . this kind of description was termed in @xcite _ response formulation _ of a quantum system ( also _ response picture _ , _ response viewpoint _ , or _ response characterisation _ ) . the said equivalence was proven in @xcite for interacting bosons and in @xcite for interacting fermions ( see also endnote @xcite ) . the closed - time - loop formulation is the most general formal framework known in quantum field theory . _ ipso facto _ , our approach may be seen as an ultimate generalisation of the phase - space techniques in quantum electrodynamics ( cf . endnote @xcite ) . its ability to tackle relativistic problems with renormalisations was demonstrated in @xcite . the way the paper is structured reflects our wish to make the results intuitive . `` obscured macroscopic view '' as a formal viewpoint is mostly relegated to appendices . in the main body of the paper , we proceed by `` doing quantum electrodynamics while thinking classically '' . we start from a brief overview of the results in . in , we develop the `` classical yardstick '' : a collection of general formulae , describing properties of devices and their interactions in classical stochastic electrodynamics . quantum mechanics starts in , which summarises formal definitions . conditional p - functionals are introduced in . the conjecture that classical formulae of are in fact _ exact _ relations for p - functionals is verified in and [ ch:91rj ] . in , we review the formal approach , concentrating on the interplay of the formal viewpoint and approximations . the results are discussed in . in appendix [ ch : reg ] we briefly touch upon the role of causality and regularisations in the classical electromagnetic self - action problem . appendix [ ch : qr ] summarises the results `` imported '' from earlier papers . in appendix [ ch : lm ] , we outline redefinitions allowing one to exclude passive linear devices ( mirrors etc . ) from explicit consideration . appendices [ ch:2dc ] and [ ch : phdet ] provide formal support to `` pictorial derivations '' in . in this paper we concern ourselves with the _ formal structure _ of quantum electrodynamics . rather than attempting to calculate something measurable , we look at restrictions measurable quantities must obey , assuming the only means of accessing the world is the electromagnetic interaction . moreover , we are only interested in relations which are independent of any particulars of nonelectromagnetic nature . this greatly limits the kind of question we are able to ask . consider for instance electromagnetic interaction of two devices depicted schematically in . for the time being , ignore hats and think about the devices as classical electromagnetic scatterers . in any real problem , there must exist microscopic dynamical models allowing one to calculate properties of the devices . these models necessarily rely on information about properties of matter , which is by itself nonelectromagnetic ( e.g. , the dirac equation in spinor qed , or various models in solid state theory ) . within `` obscured macroscopic view '' , we are not inquiring about such details . we assume that properties of individual devices are known ( a ) , and ask how they should be formally combined to determine properties of the pair ( b ) . this way , our investigation is to a large extent a highly formalised electronic - engineering viewpoint . when planning an experiment , an engineer is only interested in properties of a photodiod ( say ) such as frequency range , efficiency , dark count , dead time , saturation limit , and so on . from our perspective , all these are _ response properties _ of the photodiod . we mention features such as dark count and saturation limit to emphasise that proper formalisation of the engineering viewpoint can not be too simple . it should include , e.g. , such nastiness as _ nonlinear non - markovian self - noise_. this is the minimal level of theoretical sophistication accommodating for shot noise , dark count , dead time , and saturation . at the same time , the problem we face is largely pedagogical . we need a formal framework which would not impose any restrictions on models of devices . this implies a relatively high level of abstraction . physically , all we can say about the arrangements in a , b is that , * in `` obscured macroscopic view '' , each device is characterised by a c - number random current ; * statistics of this current is dependent ( conditional ) on the incoming field radiated by some external sources and affecting the device ; * when characterising a particular device , the incoming field should be regarded given ; * for each device in the pair , the incoming field is the external field plus radiation of the other device ; * the current characterising the pair is a sum of currents in the devices ; * the field emitted by the pair is a sum of fields emitted by the devices . in , we take these trivialities in classical electrodynamics to a high level of formal abstraction . in the following sections , we demonstrate that quantum - electrodynamical relations in the `` obscured macroscopic view '' express nothing but the same set of trivialities . it is this fact_and not the trivialities themselves_that constitutes the result of this paper . in this section we construct a `` classical yardstick '' for future quantum analyses . we develop a formal response characterisation of a device in classical stochastic electrodynamics , including the formal solution to the self - action problem ( cf . a ; ignore hats ) , then derive formulae reducing properties of an interacting pair to its components ( cf . we employ an intuitive characterisation of radiation scatterers in terms of probability distributions conditional on external sources , making all our derivations next to trivial . from the point of view of an `` electromagnetic observer '' , the world is a maze of electromagnetic currents . these currents are mostly stochastic ( we do not need quantum mechanics to arrive at this conclusion , experimental evidence is aplenty ) . thinking of a device as a macroscopic radiation scatterer ( a ) , we characterise it by a probability distribution over a random current conditional on the incoming ( external ) field . for simplicity , we suppress all arguments of the fields and currents except time ; for a generalisation beyond single mode see below . in a general nonlinear non - markovian case , is a nontrivial _ functional _ of two variables . its full name is _ conditional functional probability distribution . _ in classical stochastic electrodynamics , @xmath0}\geq 0 , % } { % \label{eq:35at}\end{aligned}\]]but we never use this in our reasoning otherwise `` doing quantum electrodynamics while thinking classically '' would certainly fail . viewed literally , all formulae in this paper are written for a one - mode case . to adapt them to more complicated situations it suffices to `` expand '' the time variable . a multi - mode case is recovered replacing , @xmath1where @xmath2 is the mode index . ( here and hereafter , omitted integration limits indicate the maximal possible area of integration . ) a nonrelativistic 3d formulation emerges on replacing , @xmath3where is now the 3d index . this covers all cases of interest in macroscopic optics . relativistic reformulation takes changing a few signs and factors , see @xcite and appendix [ ch : gz ] . averages of the random current may be written as functional ( path ) integrals , @xmath4\ , p\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } \mathcal{j}(t ) , \\ \protect \langle \mathcal{j}(t)\mathcal{j}(t ' ) \rangle & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}]\ , p \protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } \mathcal{j}(t ) \mathcal{j}(t ' ) , \end{aligned } \label{eq:27ak}\end{aligned}\]]etc . averages ( [ eq:27ak ] ) are by definition conditional on the source . we stress that we have not invented anything new , but simply explained what the innocuous symbol of classical averaging actually means . we think about a path integral as a multidimensional integral in discretised time , @xmath5 = \prod_t \bigg [ \int d\mathcal{j}(t ) \bigg ] , % } { % \label{eq:28al}\end{aligned}\]]cf . the remark on omitted integration limits after . to generalise ( [ eq:28al ] ) beyond a single mode , use formulae of . such definition makes all manipulations straightforward . a mathematically sound limit of continuous time is outside the scope of this paper . the minimal requirement for any physical model is _ nonrelativistic causality_. namely , the external field at time @xmath6 may only influence the current for times ( cf . endnote @xcite ) . varying for times should have no effect on . formally , this is expressed by the zero variational ( functional ) derivative , @xmath7for the averages , @xmath8and similarly for higher - order averages . it should not be missed that neither nor ( [ eq:54nf ] ) assume setting to zero after differentiation . the latter is characteristic of the definition of generalised susceptibilities , @xmath9from ( [ eq:54nf ] ) we obtain , @xmath10however , afford a stronger result , @xmath11unlike ( [ eq:89nh ] ) , this condition , as well as the underlying conditions ( [ eq:86nd ] ) and ( [ eq:54nf ] ) , remain physically meaningful also in a vicinity of a phase transition . the scattered field is the field radiated by the random current , @xmath12where is the transfer function of the linear medium ( or vacuum ) in which the device is immersed . response of the linear medium should be causal , @xmath13we do not assume the linear medium to be stationary ( nor homogeneous subject to generalisations as per ) . we however do assume it to be passive : its radiation ( e.g. , thermal ) must be negligible . for simplicity , we assume that is not affected by the presence of devices . this assumption is utterly impractical . in a laser theory ( say ) , it means that the mirrors and the active medium are introduced on an equal basis . it is much more common to reassign linear susceptibilies of devices to the `` free '' field . all passive linear devices ( mirrors , beam - splitters and _ tutti quanti _ ) are then eliminated from explicit consideration , being accounted for in . for purposes of this paper , practicality is the least of concerns , so we stick with simplicity . we return to this assumption in ; a formal way of lifting it is outlined in appendix [ ch : lm ] . whether a particular physical entity is regarded `` linear medium '' or `` device '' depends on the degree of insight . for instance , in nonrelativistic theories , vacuum is `` linear medium '' . in relativistic qed , vacuum is rather a `` nonlinear device '' , of which the _ low frequency limit of linear response _ is separated from `` vacuum corrections '' . this low frequency limit is that what one calls `` the free electromagnetic field in vacuum '' . the whole procedure is highly nontrivial because of divergences and renormalisations . for details , see textbooks @xcite and papers @xcite . mixed averages of the field and current reduce to current averages , @xmath14and similarly for higher - order averages . formally , these averages imply existence of a joint conditional probability functional over the current and field , @xmath15 \mathcal{d } [ \mathcal{a}]\ , p \protect { [ \mathcal{j},\mathcal{a}| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } \mathcal{j}(t ) \mathcal{a}(t ' ) , % } { % \label{eq:29am}\end{aligned}\]]etc . the radiation law ( [ eq:95rn ] ) reduces to , @xmath16}= \delta [ \mathcal{a}-g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j } ] p\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } , % } { % \label{eq:30an}\end{aligned}\]]where we use a condensed notation , @xmath17the @xmath18-functional is defined as a multidimensional @xmath18-function , @xmath19 = \prod_t \delta ( f(t ) ) . % } { % \label{eq:31ap}\end{aligned}\]]this matches , making all algebraic manipulations straightforward . distribution provides a macroscopic characterisation of a device in terms of statistics of a random current , conditional on radiation of _ other devices_. in a microscopic model of a device , evolution of matter depends on the local ( microscopic ) field rather than on the external field . the local field includes self - radiation of matter , i.e. , @xmath20where we used condensed notation ( [ eq:77nv ] ) . the microscopic model allows one to calculate statistics of the current conditional on the local field . formally , it is described by the probability distribution , which we assume to be known ( here is a given quantity ; is disregarded ) . the self - action problem is then solved by the `` stohastic dressing formula '' , @xmath21}= p^{\mathrm{i}}\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}]}. % } { % \label{eq:38aw}\end{aligned}\]]the apparent simplicity of this relation is extremely deceptive . its consistency is subject to causality and suppression of instantaneous self - action . for a brief discussion consider now a pair of devices , labeled @xmath22 and @xmath23 ( cf . b ; again ignore hats ) . each is characterised by a pair of distributions connected by , macroscopically by , and microscopically by . extends to individual devices , @xmath24}= p_{a , b}^{\mathrm{i}}\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}]}. % } { % \label{eq:77lh}\end{aligned}\]]as a compound device , the pair is characterised by and . now , what does it mean that the devices are distinguishable ? since indistinguishability in the true meaning of the term does not occur in classical mechanics , the only assumption we have to make is that their models do not contain correlated noise sources . in other words , the currents @xmath25 and @xmath26 should be statisticaly independent if considered conditional on the local field . in formal terms , the corresponding joint probability distribution should factorise , @xmath27 = p^{\mathrm{i}}_{a } [ \mathcal{j}_a | a_{\mathrm{loc } } ] p^{\mathrm{i}}_{b } [ \mathcal{j}_b | a_{\mathrm{loc } } ] . \end{aligned } \label{eq:4kr}\end{aligned}\]]this realised , solution to the interaction problem in terms of the microscopic distributions is trivial . the total random current characterising the composite device is a sum of the currents in devices , @xmath28integrating ( [ eq:4kr ] ) over the redundant information we find the probability distribution over the full current , @xmath29 & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_a ] \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_b]\delta [ \mathcal{j}-\mathcal{j}_a-\mathcal{j}_b ] \nonumber\\&\quad \times p^{\mathrm{i}}_a[\mathcal{j}_a | a_{\mathrm{loc}}]p^{\mathrm{i}}_b[\mathcal{j}_b | a_{\mathrm{loc } } ] . % } { % \label{eq:5ks}\end{aligned}\]]we refrain from integration over or to maintain symmetry of formulae . the expression for the macroscopic functional by and also follows with ease . applying the stochastic dressing formula ( [ eq:38aw ] ) to ( [ eq:5ks ] ) we obtain , @xmath30 & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_a ] \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_b]\delta [ \mathcal{j}-\mathcal{j}_a-\mathcal{j}_b ] \nonumber\\&\quad \times p^{\mathrm{i}}_a[\mathcal{j}_a | a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}]p^{\mathrm{i}}_b[\mathcal{j}_b | a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j } ] . % } { % \label{eq:6kt}\end{aligned}\]]we then `` dress '' the components of the device by making use of , @xmath31 & = p^{\mathrm{i}}_a[\mathcal{j}_a | a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } ( \mathcal{j}_a+\mathcal{j}_b ) ] \\ & = p_a[\mathcal{j}_a | a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}_b ] , \\ p^{\mathrm{i}}_b[\mathcal{j}_b | a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j } ] & = p^{\mathrm{i}}_b[\mathcal{j}_b | a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } ( \mathcal{j}_a+\mathcal{j}_b ) ] \\ & = p_b[\mathcal{j}_b | a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}_a ] . \end{aligned } \label{eq:7ku}\end{aligned}\]]finally , @xmath32 & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_a ] \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_b]\delta [ \mathcal{j}-\mathcal{j}_a-\mathcal{j}_b ] \\&\quad \times p_a[\mathcal{j}_a | a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}_b]p_b[\mathcal{j}_b | a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}_a ] . \end{aligned } \label{eq:8kv}\end{aligned}\]]apart from , this formula expresses the simple fact that external field affecting either device is plus radiation of the other device ( cf . the list of `` trivialities '' in ) . in this section we reiterate formal definitions , allowing us to embed our analyses in a conventional quantum framework . we start with a brief overview of the general formal viewpoint and terminology . _ distinguishable subsystems _ in quantum mechanics `` inhabit '' orthogonal subspaces of the hilbert space . as a mathematical requirement , this definition applies in the interaction picture . all models in this paper comprise the _ electromagnetic - field _ subsystem and one or more _ matter _ subsystems . for brevity , we call matter subsystems _ devices_. the term _ bare device _ applies to characterisation of a matter subsystem in the interaction picture . a _ ( solitary ) dressed device _ refers to a model where one of the matter subsystems is made to interact with the field subsystem . _ interacting devices _ emerge by coupling more than one device to the field . direct nonelectromagnetic interaction of devices is not allowed . dressed solitary and interacting devices are characterised by the corresponding heisenberg field and current operators ( which are interaction - dependent , unlike the interaction - picture operators ) . of main interest to us is how properties of interacting devices are related to those of the solitary ones . in formal terms , we look at relations between heisenberg operators defined according to different interaction hamiltonians . this point ought to be well noted : _ we compare models _ , rather than work with a single model . majority of the formal concepts we rely upon are standard , or at least well known . to the standard ones belong quantisation of the electromagnetic field , the electromagnetic hamiltonian as a sum of matter , field and interaction hamiltonians , the interaction _ vs _ heisenberg picture , free and heisenberg operators , and the initial ( heisenberg ) state of the system specified in remote past . the latter gives rise to quantum averaging . we do not use the schrdinger picture . implicit in our techniques are also the evolution operator and the @xmath33-matrix ( they underlie the results `` imported '' from @xcite ; cf . appendix [ ch : qr ] ) . all these concepts are amply covered in textbooks @xcite . among the well - known concepts are the time - normal ordering of operators , introduced by kelley and kleiner and glauber in the context of photodetection theory @xcite , and placing c - number sources into hamiltonians , which we borrow from kubo @xcite . it should not be missed that , unlike kubo , we do not limit our analyses to the linear response . `` proprietary '' formal concepts we use are the _ response transformation _ of quantum mechanics @xcite , and the redefinition of the conventional time - normal operator ordering this transformation prompts @xcite . the latter takes care of causality violations @xcite plagueing the conventional definition ; this assures strict causality in our approach @xcite . key points of the `` proprietary '' concepts will be reiterated where required . for details see the quoted papers . throughout the paper we assume the standard electromagnetic hamiltonian , @xmath34hereinafter m , f and i stand for _ matter _ , _ field _ and _ interaction_. quantum averaging is defined with respect to the factorised heisenberg @xmath35-matrix , @xmath36where and describe the initial states of field and matter . the same symbol ( angle brackets ) is used for the classical and quantum averages ; what we have in mind should be clear in the context . for simplicity we write the electromagnetic interaction in a single - mode form , @xmath37 , \label{eq:36mm}\end{aligned}\]]where and are the current and the electromagnetic field operators in the interaction picture , and is the aforementioned kubo - style source . this hamiltonian may be understood literally , or as a shorthand notation according to . the latter implies summation over all field labels except time . e.g. , in the multimode case , @xmath38 = \sum_{k } \hat j_k(t ) [ \hat a_k(t)+a_{\mathrm{e}k}(t ) ] , % } { % \label{eq:61px}\end{aligned}\]]in the nonrelativistic 3d case , @xmath39 \nonumber\\&\quad = \int d^3{\mbox{\rm\boldmath$r$}}\sum_{k=1}^3 \hat j_k({\mbox{\rm\boldmath$r$}},t ) [ \hat a_k({\mbox{\rm\boldmath$r$}},t)+a_{\mathrm{e}k}({\mbox{\rm\boldmath$r$}},t ) ] , % } { % \label{eq:18zz}\end{aligned}\]]etc . irrespective of all other formal details , and commute for arbitrary @xmath6 and @xmath40 , and all their mixed quantum averages factorise ( cf . the remarks on the `` overall viewpoint '' in above ) . that this does not extend to the heisenberg operators denoted and is due solely to the interaction . the heisenberg operators and their quantum averages are by construction dependent ( conditional ) on the external source . it should not be overlooked that interaction ( [ eq:36 mm ] ) is nonresonant : and are hermitian operators , not broken into their frequency - positive and frequency - negative parts . we adhere to certain notational conventions . italics are consistently used for interaction - picture operators ; this concerns hamiltonians ( [ eq:37mn ] ) and ( [ eq:36 mm ] ) , as well as all other hamiltonians in the paper . calligraphic letters are equally consistently used for heisenberg operators . apart from the minimal assumptions of hermiticity of all operators and positivity of -matrices , the matter hamiltonian @xmath41 , the current operator @xmath42 and the state of the device @xmath43 may be arbitrary . consistency of the response formulation @xcite hinges on two properties of : that it is a free hermitian bosonic operator , of which the two - point commutator is a c - number , and that its frequency - positive part annihilates vacuum . we assume that the field is in a vacuum state , @xmath44physically , assumptions ( [ eq:40bj ] ) and ( [ eq:42bl ] ) matter little , because the system is allowed infinite time to develop . _ in no way do we assume that a closed system of microscopic equations of motion may be written solely in terms of the mesoscopic variables and . _ some underlying dynamical variables must exist , bosonic or fermionic , by which all matter variables are expressed , and for which closed equations of motion may be written . however , apart from the assumption that it may in principle be consistenly formulated , microscopic dynamics plays no role in our analyses . macroscopic dynamics is observed , but in general does not allow one to construct a closed theory . microscopic dynamics specifies the system completely , but may only be inferred from what is observed ( cf . however ) . it is worthy of stressing that _ the possibility of separation of the mesoscopic from microscopic dynamics is not an assumption_. it is a structural property of conventional quantum field theory ( specifically , of the feynman - dyson approach ) @xcite , cf . @xcite and appendix [ ch : qr ] in this paper . all parallels between classical and quantum electrodynamics are ultimately rooted on the _ wave quantisation relation _ @xcite . it introduces the concept of running electromagnetic wave in quantum electrodynamics : @xmath45 = -i\hbar [ g_{\text{r } } ( t , t')-g_{\text{r } } ( t',t ) ] . % } { % \label{eq:40mr}\end{aligned}\]]the linear response function ( a.k.a . transfer function or retarded propagator ) of the electromagnetic field is found replacing the quantum current in ( [ eq:36 mm ] ) by a c - number source and considering the linear response of the free field : @xmath46 . % } { % \label{eq:41ms}\end{aligned}\]]the first formula here is the definition of and the last one is kubo s relation for it @xcite ; we dropped quantum averaging of the commutator which is a c - number anyway . the wave quantisation formula follows trivially by inverting kubo s one . it is not associated with any approximation , but its implications are much more profound under conditions of distinguishability . note that the causality condition ( [ eq:92nl ] ) is inherent to kubo s response . in the main body of the paper , we assume that is not affected by the presence of devices . this assumption was discussed in . apart from simplicity , the reason we stick to it is that it can not be lifted in a hamilton formulation . the corresponding formal redefinitions are summarised in appendix [ ch : lm ] . ( caveat : this appendix relies on definitions yet to be given in . ) a pair of interacting distinguishable devices are introduced postulating , @xmath47 , and commute for arbitrary @xmath6 , @xmath40 and @xmath48 , and all their mixed averages factorise ( cf . the remarks on hilbert - space factorisation in ) . we shall also need models of solitary devices , @xmath49for device @xmath22 , and @xmath50for device @xmath23 . majority of the above definitions are formal . they serve to embed our analyses in a conventional dynamical quantum approach , and to perform its response transformation ( cf . ) ; with that their role ends . assumptions `` making it '' into the discussion are as follows : * the field is fully characterised by its response properties , reflected by . * matter is fully characterised by quantum averages of products of the bare current operator , @xmath51 * for interacting devices , averages ( [ eq:31ta ] ) factorise into products of the corresponding averages for devices , e.g. , @xmath52 [ \hat j_a(t ' ) + \hat j_b(t ' ) ] \rangle \nonumber\\ & = \protect \langle \hat j_a(t)\hat j_a(t ' ) \rangle + \protect \langle \hat j_a(t ) \rangle \protect \langle \hat j_b(t ' ) \rangle \nonumber\\&\quad + \ { a\leftrightarrow b \ } . % } { % \label{eq:84vj}\end{aligned}\ ] ] that these assumptions suffice is a formal expression of consistency of `` obscured macroscopic view '' in quantum electrodynamics . the time - normal ordering was introduced by kelley and kleiner and glauber in the context of quantum photodetection theory @xcite ( for a pedagogical discussion see , e.g. , mandel and wolf @xcite ) . there are well - known causality violations associated with taking the glauber - kelley - kleiner definition beyond the rotating wave approximation ( rwa ) @xcite , so that the idea that some amendments are in order should come naturally to the reader . these amendments were suggested by l.p . and s.s . in @xcite , see also @xcite . as an example , consider the time - normally ordered product of two current operators , . the notation for the time - normal ordering is borrowed from mandel and wolf @xcite . we assume that the reader is familiar with the concept of separation of the frequency - positive and frequency - negative parts of functions . the latter is conveniently expressed as an integral transformation , ( with being an arbitrary function ) @xmath53for more on this operation see , e.g. , appendix a in @xcite . the beyond - the - rwa expression for follows in two steps . firstly , expand operators into the frequency - positive and frequency - negative parts , @xmath54and apply the kelley - kleiner definition , @xmath55 in this formula , stand for the forward and reverse time orderings ( often denoted by @xmath56 and @xmath57 ) . secondly , change the order of time orderings and the operations , @xmath58time - normal products of many bosonic operators follow similarly . note that @xmath59 in ( [ eq:19sn ] ) , we moved the operations from under the averaging also in the second and third terms , where this does not matter . this serves to emphasise that the rhs of ( [ eq:19sn ] ) is expressed by `` entire '' operators , not broken in their frequency - positive and frequency - negative parts ( cf . sec . 3.2 in @xcite ) . the reader familiar with the schwinger - perel - keldysh closed - time - loop approach of quantum field theory @xcite should have recoginised operator structures typical for this framework . indeed , formally , and the like follow if using the wave quantisation formula to replace the matrix propagator in the closed - time - loop approach by the retarded propagator @xcite . this association with quantum field theory assures a solid formal ground for our analyses . it is straightforward to show that the time - normally ordered product of hermitian operators is hermitian ; quantum averages of time - normally ordered products of hermitian operators ( time - normal averages , for short ) are real . causality is a subtler property . the following `` no - peep - into - the - future theorem '' was proven in @xcite : _ a time - normally ordered product depends on operators it comprises only for times not larger than its largest time argument_. for a relativistic extension of this theorem see @xcite ; cf . also endnote @xcite . in addition to , we introduce three more cases of condensed notation : @xmath60where @xmath61 and @xmath62 are c - number or q - number functions . the `` products '' @xmath63 and @xmath64 denote scalars , while @xmath65 and @xmath66functions . the effect of condensed notation is twofold : it diminishes the bulk of formulae and reduces them visually to a scalar case . the latter much simplifies all calculations ( we borrowed this trick from vasilev @xcite ) . in this section we introduce the formal concepts , allowing one , so to speak , to implement in quantum electrodynamics . we also use this opportunity to acquaint the reader with the key results of papers @xcite . the quantum counterpart of the classical averages ( [ eq:27ak ] ) are time - normal averages of the heisenberg current operator , @xmath67etc . the classical averages were dependent ( conditional ) on an external field by definition . the quantum average exhibits this dependence by construction , due to the external field in the interaction ( [ eq:36 mm ] ) . introduces _ response formulation _ @xcite ( also response picture , response viewpoint , or response characterisation ) of an electromagnetic device . specifications beyond the rwa aside , one borrows the concepts of the photodetection theory to characterise the _ output _ of a device , while using kubo - style sources to define the _ input _ ( cf . also endnote @xcite ) . as remarked in above , the beyond - the - rwa time - normal ordering emerges in fact within the closed - time - loop formalism of quantum field theory @xcite . moreover , the response formulation was shown to be formally equivalent to this formalism @xcite . for details see the quoted papers and appendix [ ch : qr ] . an immediate word of caution is in place here . in our approach external sources are used as functional arguments . this implies that they are _ arbitrary_. informally speaking , we allow c - number sources to be placed inside atomic nuclei . this extent of control is certainly impossible with real light sources . _ arbitrary external sources in quantum mechanics are unphysical quantities . _ this controversy is resolved by the so - called _ consistency condition _ @xcite . for an electromagnetic system , it is expressed by and ( [ eq:38fv ] ) in appendix [ ch : qr ] . it stipulates that , * response properties of a system are formally expressed in terms of heisenberg operators defined with zero sources ( cf . kubo s ) . * these properties are `` encoded '' in commutators of these operators ( again , cf . ) . these facts hold with given sources . with arbitrary sources , the consistency condition also shows that , * the information lost due to fixing the time - normal order of operators is exactly that re - entering through the dependence of the ordered operator products on the sources . all these facts warrant the formal consistency of the response formulation , hence the term . since arbitrary sources are unphysical , response formulation should be regarded an _ intuitive interpretation _ of a conventional quantum approach not relying on sources ( specifically , of the aforementioned closed - time - loop formalism ) . this interpretation enables `` doing quantum electrodynamics while thinking classically '' , making it extremely useful ; nonetheless it is only formal . the interplay of the formal and the physical in response formulation will be further discussed in . being of fundamental importance for introduction of the response formulation , the consistency condition is of little if any relevance to analyses within it . for all practical purposes only its existence matters . the critical property making the analogy ( [ eq:53ne ] ) meaningful is _ causality_. the no - peep - into - the - future theorem mentioned in assures validity of the quantum counterparts of , @xmath68etc . apart from the said theorem , they rely on the quantum counterpart of , @xmath69conditions ( [ eq:55nh ] ) may be verified without making any assumptions about the quantum matter @xcite . in other words , they constitute in essence a kinematical property of quantum mechanics . relativistic extention of ( [ eq:55nh ] ) takes a minimal assumption of commutativity of operators at space - like intervals . this is one of wightman s axioms of quantum field theory @xcite . for details see @xcite and endnote @xcite . generalised to quantum mechanics , define the _ functional conditional quasiprobability distribition _ , or _ conditional p - functional _ , , @xmath70\ , p\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } \mathcal{j}(t ) , \\ \protect \langle { \mathcal t}{\mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\protect{\hat{\mathcal j}}(t)\protect{\hat{\mathcal j}}(t'){\mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\rangle & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}]\ , p \protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } \mathcal{j}(t ) \mathcal{j}(t ' ) , \end{aligned } \label{eq:33ar}\end{aligned}\]]etc . these quantities generalise both _ conditional probability distributions _ of classical stochastics and _ quasiprobability distributions _ of the conventional phase - space techniques to arbitrary nonlinear non - markovian quantum systems . we do not notationally distinguish the quasidistributions from probability distributions , assuming that , in classical mechanics , they are positive , while in quantum mechanics may become nonpositive . the term p - functional was introduced by w. vogel @xcite for a functional generalisation of the conventional p - distribution @xcite . our definition generalises vogel s , firstly , beyond rwa , and , secondly , to response . in classical mechanics , the conditional probability distribution is a primary quantity , while averages are defined in its terms . in quantum mechanics , all dynamical relations are derived for averages , and the corresponding p - functionals are to be defined in terms of the latter . we follow the association between probability distributions and characteristic functionals . for example , for the classical we have , @xmath71\ , p\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } \exp(i\zeta \mathcal{j } ) . % } { % \label{eq:43tp}\end{aligned}\]]we use condensed notation ( [ eq:3vs ] ) . the quantum counterpart of ( [ eq:43tp ] ) reads , @xmath72 } & = \protect \langle { \mathcal t}{\mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\exp ( i\zeta \protect{\hat{\mathcal j } } ) { \mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\rangle \label{eq:20sp}\\ & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}]\ , p\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } \exp ( i\zeta \mathcal{j } ) . \label{eq:41az}\end{aligned}\]]apart from defining the conditional p - functional , we have also introduced notation for the corresponding characteristic one . we also need a quantum definition of the joint quasiprobability distribution , @xmath73 } & = \protect \langle { \mathcal t}{\mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\exp ( i\eta \protect{\hat{\mathcal a}}+i\zeta \protect{\hat{\mathcal j } } ) { \mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\rangle \label{eq:44tq}\\ & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{a}]\mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j } ] \ , p[\mathcal{a},\mathcal{j}|a_{\mathrm{e}}]\exp ( i\eta \mathcal{a}+i\zeta \mathcal{j } ) . % } { % \label{eq:45tr}\end{aligned}\]]cf . the classical . now , how should we define ? to start with , here is a given quantity ; should be disregarded . fixing means that self - radiation is somehow prevented from affecting the device . this is achieved by suppressing interaction of the device with the quantised field , i.e. , replacing interaction ( [ eq:36 mm ] ) by , @xmath74this way , @xmath75 & = \protect \langle { \mathcal t}{\mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\exp ( i\zeta \hat j_{\mathrm{loc } } ) { \mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\rangle , \label{eq:21sq}\\ & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}]\ , p^{\mathrm{i}}\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{loc } } ] } \exp ( i\zeta \mathcal{j } ) . \label{eq:24st}\end{aligned}\]]where is the heisenberg current operator with respect to ( [ eq:47bf ] ) . an immediate reservation is in place here . definitions ( [ eq:20sp])([eq:24st ] ) are a rare occasion when the consistency condition ( see ) must be at least acknowledged . as explained there , ([eq:24st ] ) constitute an intuitive interpretation of all functionals involved , while their rigorous definitions can not rely on external sources . such definitions may be found in appendices [ ch : upc ] and [ ch:25su ] . for the time being , awareness of their existence suffices . this reservation is especially important for . it is in fact a primary quantity , with everything else expressed by it . that it can be _ directly _ expressed by averages of is critical for consistency of our approach , cf . and comments thereon . as an example of working with functionals we prove . substituting it into ( [ eq:45tr ] ) results in the following relation between and , @xmath73}= \phi_{\mathrm{m}}\protect { [ \eta g_{\text{r } } + \zeta | a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } . % } { % \label{eq:47tt}\end{aligned}\]]we use notation ( [ eq:78nw ] ) . is a special case of the general formula ( [ eq:53ze ] ) in appendix [ ch : upd ] , verified in @xcite . has thus been proven as a quantum formula for p - functionals . differentiating ( [ eq:47tt ] ) and using the chain rule for functional derivatives we obtain quantum counterparts of , @xmath76etc . a detailed parallelism between classical and quantum response characterisations of a solitary device is evident . it is worthy of a remark that , while and ( [ eq:47tt ] ) are equivalent , physical transparency of the former compares favourably to obscure formality of the latter . consider now the self - action problem for a solitary device . in quantum electrodynamics , it is expressed by the _ dressing formula _ @xcite , relating averages of the heisenberg operator to those of the `` free '' current , @xmath77 % % \\ = \exp \bigg ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e}}}g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta } \bigg ) % \\ \times \phi_{\mathrm{m}}^{\mathrm{i } } \big [ \zeta \big| a_{\mathrm{e } } \big ] . \label{eq:54zf}\end{aligned}\]]we use condensed notation ( [ eq:76nu ] ) . substituting ( [ eq:24st ] ) into the dressing formula we find , @xmath78 } \nonumber\\&\quad = \exp \big ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e}}}g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta } \big ) \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j } ] \,p^{\mathrm{i}}\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } \exp ( i\zeta \mathcal{j } ) \nonumber\\&\quad = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j } ] \exp \big ( \frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e}}}g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}\big ) p^{\mathrm{i}}\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] } \exp ( i\zeta \mathcal{j } ) \nonumber\\&\quad = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}]\ , p^{\mathrm{i}}\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}]}\exp ( i\zeta \mathcal{j } ) . % } { % \label{eq:43bb}\end{aligned}\]]the last transformation here is an application of a functional shift operator , @xmath79}= p^{\mathrm{i}}\protect { [ \mathcal{j}| a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}]}. % } { % \label{eq:44bc}\end{aligned}\]]the dressing formula ( [ eq:54zf ] ) is thus equivalent to the _ quasistochastic dressing formula _ , which is the stochastic dressing formula ( [ eq:38aw ] ) regarded as a relation for p - functionals . two remarks are in order here . firstly , the dressing formula expresses the nontrivial part of perturbative calculations . in full - space problems , this is associated with suppression of infinities , which in turn are due to instantaneous self - actions . further discussion of this issue may be found in appendix [ ch : reg ] . secondly , the very possibility to introduce quasidistribution as a characterisation of a bare device is yet another manifestation of the concept of obscured macroscopic view in the formal structure of quantum electrodynamics . microscopic dynamics is screened from the `` electromagnetic observer '' from the start , by mere assumption that interaction with the quantised electromagnetic field is facilitated by the current . this happens _ before _ the field and interaction are actually introduced . the critical step to physics is from a solitary device to an interacting pair ( b ) . allow one to confine the discussion to the quantum current . the `` dressed '' and `` bare '' p - functionals for devices @xmath22 and @xmath23 and the corresponding characteristic functionals are introduced extending definitions ( [ eq:20sp ] ) , ( [ eq:41az ] ) and ( [ eq:21sq ] ) , ( [ eq:24st ] ) to the models of devices ( [ eq:47my ] ) and ( [ eq:48mz ] ) . in practice , this boils down to assigning labels @xmath22 and @xmath23 to everything , e.g. , @xmath80 } & = \protect \langle { \mathcal t}{\mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\exp ( i\zeta \protect{\hat{\mathcal j } } ) { \mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\rangle _ a % \eqlabel{20sp } % % \nonumber % % \z \nonumber\\ & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}]\ , p_a[\mathcal{j}|a_{\mathrm{e}}]\exp ( i\zeta \mathcal{j } ) . % } { % \label{eq:27sw}\end{aligned}\]]the symbol denotes averages defined in the model of solitary device @xmath22 , cf . . similar definitions apply to other `` labeled '' quantities . as the first step to verification of and ( [ eq:8kv ] ) as quantum relations for p - functionals we rewrite them in terms of the corresponding characteristic functionals . substituting the former into ( [ eq:24st ] ) we get , @xmath81 } & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_a ] \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_b ] \exp[i\zeta ( \mathcal{j}_a+\mathcal{j}_b ) ] \nonumber\\&\quad \times p^{\mathrm{i}}_a[\mathcal{j}_a | a_{\mathrm{loc}}]p^{\mathrm{i}}_b[\mathcal{j}_b | a_{\mathrm{loc } } ] . % } { % \label{eq:9kw}\end{aligned}\]]the integral factorises , and we arrive at , @xmath82 = \phi_{\mathrm{m}a } ^{\mathrm{i } } [ \zeta | a_{\mathrm{loc } } ] \phi_{\mathrm{m}b } ^{\mathrm{i } } [ \zeta | a_{\mathrm{loc } } ] . \end{aligned } \label{eq:63bf}\end{aligned}\ ] ] takes more work . substituting it into ( [ eq:41az ] ) yields , @xmath83 & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_a ] \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_b ] \exp[i\zeta ( \mathcal{j}_a+\mathcal{j}_b ) ] \\&\quad \times p_{a } [ \mathcal{j}_a \big| a_{\mathrm{e } } + g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}_b ] p_{b } [ \mathcal{j}_b \big| a_{\mathrm{e } } + g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}_a ] . \end{aligned } \label{eq:10kx}\end{aligned}\]]we then take the route as in , but in reverse . we start from writing , @xmath84 % % \np = \exp \bigg ( \frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } } g_{\text{r } } \mathcal{j}_b \bigg ) p_{a } [ \mathcal{j}_a \big| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] , % } { % \label{eq:11ky}\end{aligned}\]]then pull the exponential differential operator out of the integral . similar manipulations are applied to . as a result we find , @xmath85 & = \exp \bigg ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } ' } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta } -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta ' } \bigg ) \nonumber\\&\quad \times \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_a ] \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_b ] \exp ( i\zeta \mathcal{j}_a + i\zeta ' \mathcal{j}_b ) \nonumber\\&\qquad \times p_{a } [ \mathcal{j}_a \big| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] p_{b } [ \mathcal{j}_b \big| a_{\mathrm{e } } ' ] |_{\zeta ' = \zeta , a_{\mathrm{e}}'=a_{\mathrm{e } } } . % } { % \label{eq:14lb}\end{aligned}\]]introducing pairs of variables @xmath86 and @xmath87 allows all differentiations to hit the right targets . the integral in ( [ eq:14 lb ] ) is factorised . recalling ( [ eq:27sw ] ) we arrive at the relation sought , @xmath85 & = \exp \bigg ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } ' } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta } -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta ' } \bigg ) \nonumber\\&\quad \times \phi_{\mathrm{m}a } [ \zeta \big | a_{\mathrm{e } } ] \phi_{\mathrm{m}b } [ \zeta ' \big | a_{\mathrm{e } } ' ] \settoheight{\auxlv}{$ |$}% \raisebox{-0.3\auxlv}{$ |_{\zeta ' = \zeta , a_{\mathrm{e}}'=a_{\mathrm{e}}}$}. % } { % \label{eq:66bk}\end{aligned}\ ] ] follows from factorisation of quantum averages for two distinguishable noninteracting subsystems , cf . . to prove it , use the definition of by , and the factorisation assumption ( [ eq:84vj ] ) . we regard verified . in turn , this proves as a formula for p - functionals . substituting ( [ eq:63bf ] ) into the dressing formula ( [ eq:54zf ] ) we obtain , @xmath88 & = \exp \bigg ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta } \bigg ) \nonumber\\&\quad \times \phi_{\mathrm{m}a } ^{\mathrm{i } } [ \zeta \big| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] \phi_{\mathrm{m}b } ^{\mathrm{i } } [ \zeta \big| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] . % } { % \label{eq:95fm}\end{aligned}\]]we now apply the relation @xcite , @xmath89 \mathcal{f}_3 [ f ] = \mathcal{f}_1 \bigg ( \frac{\delta } { \delta f}+ \frac{\delta } { \delta f ' } \bigg ) \mathcal{f}_2 [ f ] \mathcal{f}_3 [ f ' ] |_{f'=f } , % } { % \label{eq:96fn}\end{aligned}\]]where @xmath90 $ ] , @xmath91 $ ] , @xmath91 $ ] are arbitrary functionals and @xmath92 are auxiliary functional variables . equation ( [ eq:96fn ] ) is a compact way of formulating general rules of product differentiation . it may be verified expanding @xmath90 $ ] , @xmath91 $ ] , @xmath91 $ ] in functional taylor series . using ( [ eq:96fn ] ) we rewrite ( [ eq:95fm ] ) as , @xmath88 & = \exp \bigg [ -i \bigg ( \frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } } + \frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } ' } \bigg ) g_{\text{r } } \bigg ( \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta } + \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta ' } \bigg ) \bigg ] \nonumber\\&\quad \times \phi_{\mathrm{m}a } ^{\mathrm{i } } [ \zeta \big| a_{\mathrm{e } } ] \phi_{\mathrm{m}b } ^{\mathrm{i } } [ \zeta ' \big| a_{\mathrm{e } } ' ] \settoheight{\auxlv}{$\big|$}% \raisebox{-0.3\auxlv}{$\big|_{\zeta ' = \zeta , a_{\mathrm{e}}'= a_{\mathrm{e}}}$}. % } { % \label{eq:97fp}\end{aligned}\]]expanding the bilinear form in the exponent we have , @xmath93 \nonumber\\&\quad = \exp \bigg ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } ' } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta } \bigg ) \exp \bigg ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta ' } \bigg ) \nonumber\\&\qquad \times \exp \bigg ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta } \bigg ) \exp \bigg ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } ' } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta ' } \bigg ) . % } { % \label{eq:98fq}\end{aligned}\]]the last two factors here `` dress '' the devices , @xmath94 & = \phi_{\mathrm{m}a } [ \zeta \big | a_{\mathrm{e } } ] , \\ \exp \bigg ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } ' } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta ' } \bigg ) \phi_{\mathrm{m}b}^{\mathrm{i } } [ \zeta ' \big | a_{\mathrm{e } } ' ] & = \phi_{\mathrm{m}b } [ \zeta ' \big | a_{\mathrm{e } } ' ] , \end{aligned } \label{eq:65bj}\end{aligned}\]]cf . , and we arrive at . in turn , this proves as a formula for p - functionals . extension to many devices is achieved by applying and ( [ eq:8kv ] ) recursively . so , for a set - up of @xmath95 devices , labeled by their number in place of @xmath22 and @xmath23 , we obtain , @xmath29 & = \int \prod_{k=1}^n \big \ { \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_k ] \,p^{\mathrm{i}}_k[\mathcal{j}_k | a_{\mathrm{loc } } ] \big \ } \nonumber\\&\quad \times \delta[\mathcal{j}_1+\cdots+\mathcal{j}_n -\mathcal{j } ] , % } { % \label{eq:51tx}\end{aligned}\]]and @xmath30 & = \int \prod_{k=1}^n \big \ { \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_k ] \,p_k[\mathcal{j}_k | a_{\mathrm{e}}+g_{\text{r } } ( \mathcal{j}-\mathcal{j}_k ) ] \big \ } \nonumber\\&\quad \times \delta [ \mathcal{j}_1+\cdots+\mathcal{j}_n -\mathcal{j } ] , % } { % \label{eq:52ty}\end{aligned}\]]for the corresponding characteristic functionals we have , @xmath96 = \prod_{k=1}^n \phi_{\mathrm{m}k } ^{\mathrm{i } } [ \zeta | a_{\mathrm{loc } } ] , % } { % \label{eq:54ua}\end{aligned}\]]and @xmath85 & = \bigg \ { \exp \bigg ( -i\sum_{l\neq n}\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e}l } } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta_n } \bigg ) \nonumber\\&\quad \times \prod_{k=1}^n \phi_{\mathrm{m}k } [ \zeta_k | a_{\mathrm{e}k } ] \bigg \ } \big| _ { \ { \zeta , a_{\mathrm{e } } \ } } , % } { % \label{eq:55ub}\end{aligned}\]]where stands for the substitution , @xmath97these formulae generalise and ( [ eq:66bk ] ) . they may be verified either applying them recursively , or adapting the method of to @xmath95 devices . recursive nature of ([eq:48bh ] ) reflects design of real macroscopic ( e.g. , electronic ) devices . the latter are made of a large number of components , which , in our terms , are themselves electromagnetic devices ( cf . the `` engineering viewpoint '' in ) . true quantum mechanics only starts when this kind of subdivisibility stops . * * * ([eq:48bh ] ) give a formal expression to the statement made in the intro , that , _ under macroscopic conditions , quantum electrodynamics and classical stochastic electrodynamics have identical dynamical structure . _ one may also say that _ flow of quantum information in a macroscopic setup is governed by laws of classical stochastic electrodynamics_. truly quantum dynamics is limited to microscopic conditions of indistinguishability and/or equations of motion of matter . as was explained in , the way external c - number sources are employed in the response formulation is unphysical . this raises two questions : whether one can introduce response formulation without relying on sources , and whether one can reintroduce sources as a consistent macroscopic approximation . both questions are answered in affirmative in this section . we also take this opportunity to reiterate the key technical points of our approach , with the emphasis on their interplay with the approximations . the actual calculations underlying our resuts utilize the functional aprroach to the schwinger - perel - keldysh closed - time - loop techniques of quantum field theory @xcite ( for a recent review see @xcite ) . this is the minimal framework that allows one to include such concepts as _ arbitrary macroscopic electromagnetic device _ in a dynamical approach . the aforementioned key technical points of our approach are , * _ response transformation _ of the closed - time - loop techniques @xcite , prompted by the wave quantisation formula ( [ eq:40mr ] ) . * _ wick s theorem _ in its functional ( hori s ) form @xcite . both `` key technical points '' are exact and formally independent , but even a cursory inspection reveals that they are deeply connected . indeed , consider the problem with the hamiltonian ( cf . @xcite ) , @xmath98it is easily solved , @xmath99cf . . the no - backaction nature of a c - number source automatically makes the electromagnetic interaction directed . the question whether directedness may also be introduced in nonlinear problems is answered in the affirmative by the wave quantisation formula ( [ eq:40mr ] ) . in turn , applying response transformation to wick s theorem reveals its profound association with response properties of free quantised fields @xcite . is the simplest example of strict causality in the response of a quantum system to sources @xcite . `` strict causality '' means that it holds on all scales , macroscopic as well as microscopic . it is the``strict causality '' that makes the response formulation intuitive . paradoxical as it may sound , it is also the `` strict causality '' that makes it unphysical , because it implies one s ability to vary sorces arbitrarily on microscopic scales . application of the responce formulation to a solitary electromagnetic device @xcite and its extention to electromagnetic interactions of distinguishable devices ( of this paper ) preserve both its advantages ( causality and intuitiveness ) and its main drawback ( unphysical nature of c - number souces ) . ) . the `` electromagnetic arrows '' are directional as in . ] can one rederive the results in a manner preserving the advantages but without the drawbacks ? such alternative derivation is the subject of this section . in the main body of the paper , we resort to a `` pictorial argument '' . all calculations are relegated to the appendices . the starting point of the alternative derivation is the two - device model ( [ eq:46mx ] ) without sources , @xmath100one also has to change the order in which the `` key technical points '' ( cf . ) are applied to the two - device problem . firstly , construct a perturbative solution to this problem in the closed - time - loop framework with wick s theorem in its conventional form , secondly , impose the two - device approximation , and only in the very end perform the response transformation . the first step of this schedule may be borrowed from preprint @xcite , by dropping sources in the closed perturbative formula ( 56 ) . the other two steps are outlined in appendix [ ch:2dc ] . dressed devices as scattering entities emerge in such model due to an interplay of distinguishability with the wave quantisation formula ( [ eq:40mr ] ) . indeed , consider the formal structure of electromagnetic interaction _ before _ the response transformation ( fig . [ fig : birdseye10]a ) . this picture is a schematic representation of in the appendix . assumed distinguishability of the devices leads to separation of the electromagnetic self - action problems for the devices from the problem of their electromagnetic interaction . `` separation '' means that the self - action problems for the devices may be formulated within models ( [ eq:47my ] ) and ( [ eq:48mz ] ) without any reference to the two - device model . neither fig . [ fig : birdseye10]a nor the underlying `` know '' anything about directedness of the electromagnetic interaction . graphically , this is emphasized by making dashed arrows symbolising the electromagnetic interaction bidirectional . the concept of `` dressed macroscopic device '' relies only _ on the assumption of distinguishability and on the formal structure of quantum electrodynamics_. it is not limited to any kind of response characterisation of a quantum system . the structure of electromagnetic interactions _ after _ the response transformation is illustrated in fig . [ fig : birdseye10]b . this picture is a schematic representation of . in response picture , free electromagnetic field is characterised by the retarded propagator . consequently all `` electromagnetic arrows '' in fig . [ fig : birdseye10]b are directional as in . the way fig . [ fig : birdseye10]b is drawn emphasises that the wave quantisation formula gives rise to characterisation of the individual devices as _ dressed response entities_. this happens _ irrespective of c - number sources_which , we remind , are absent in the approach illustrated in . field entity , operating independently of the detector . formally , this entity is characterised by functional ( [ eq:70qh ] ) in appendix [ ch : phdet ] . ( b ) the four - device arrangement , to which response characterisation of the two - device model ( cf . b ) is an approximation . neglected macroscopic actions and back - actions are shown as dotted arrows . ] the central formal result of this paper is that the dressed response entities in b are identical with those emerging in formal models of the solitary devices with sources ( a ) . as formal concepts , these models were discussed in . the formal expression of this identity is the consistency condition . reintroducing sources in this approach starts from recognising the drastically different roles of single - directedness in the self - action and in the interaction problems . in the case of self - action , both ends of @xmath101 are attached , so to speak , to the same electron . there is no way to control microscopic actions and back - actions associated with emitting and reabsorbing the field by matter at a truly microscopic level . whereas in case of interaction , the signals travelling from device @xmath22 to device @xmath23 may be _ experimentally distinguished _ from those travelling from device @xmath23 to device @xmath22 . consider , e.g. , the generalised photodetection problem ( a ) . calculations underlying this figure are relegated to appendix [ ch : phdet ] ( cf . also endnote @xcite ) . one starts from two scattering entities depicted in b. the physical assumption turning them into _ source _ and _ detector _ is that the macroscopic electromagnetic backaction ( shown in a as a dotted arrow ) can be neglected . this does not interfere with self - action problems for the source and detector , nor with the accuracy with which their properties may be accounted for . neglecting macroscopic backaction gives rise to the concept of detected field . the corresponding formal entity is enclosed in a in the dashed oval . formally , the detected field is the radiated field in the model of the solitary device @xmath22 . it is described by the time - normal field averages , @xmath102the additional subscript 0 reminds that all c - number sources should be put to zero . in general , averages ( [ eq:13sf ] ) can not be mimicked by any classical phenomenology ( quantum states of detected radiation ) . the semiclassical photodetection theory is recoved by assuming that such phenomenology ( the _ classical doppelganger _ of the source , see below ) does exist . in this phenomenology one introduces a random classical field , such that , @xmath103etc . this defines sources of radiation in a classical state . for coherent sources , averages ( [ eq:13sf ] ) factorise , @xmath104etc . as far as the detection process is concerned , a coherent source is fully accounted for by the interaction with the external field in the hamiltonian . similar arguments apply to other arrangements with external sources . in particular , response characterisation of a two - device model ( b ) is physically an approximation to the four - device arrangement ( b ) , where some of the macroscopic actions and backactions ( shown as dotted arrows ) have been neglected . external sources introduced in this manner are `` coarse - grained '' quantities limited to macroscopic scales and conditions of distinguishability . they suffice for a macroscopic characterisation of response properties of devices . upgrading this characterisation to a response formulation requires external sources placed inside atoms and electrons . this _ physically unjustified _ leap of logic recovers response formulation as a formal viewpoint , while also making it unphysical . in particular , theoretical response characterisation of a device is more detailed than anything one can measure in a real experiment . recovering the former from the latter is always a matter of inference . two remarks are in place here . firstly , we called the photodetection arrangement in a _ generalised _ because we did not require classicality of the output current of the detector . such classicality is an additional assumption , distinguishing real photodetectors in the true meaning of the term ( cf . below ) . on the other hand , that this classicality is not needed allows one to easily generalise a to _ cascaded systems _ @xcite . secondly , in practice , control of macroscopic electromagnetic actions and back - actions is very much a matter of engineering . examples are control of stray currents and fields in electronics and prevention of reflection of light toward laser sources in optics ( to name just two ) . we take the liberty of starting this section with a somewhat lengthy quotation from w. lamb s renowned paper on operational approach to quantum mechanics @xcite : + `` a discussion of the interpretation of quantum mechanics on any level beyond [ regarding it a set of rules for calculating physical properties of matter ] almost inevitably becomes rather vague . the major difficulty involves the concept of measurement . i have taught graduate courses in quantum mechanics for over 20 years , and for almost all of them have dealt with measurement in the following manner . on beginning of lectures i told the students , ` you must first learn the rules of calculation in quantum mechanics , and then i will tell you about the theory of measurement and discuss the meaning of the subject . ' my attitude towards such problems has no doubt been influenced by contact with some research in experimental physics in which atomic states are `` manipulated '' by microwave and radiofrequency fields . in discussion of measurement of some dynamical variable of a physical system i want to know what apparatus is necessary for the task and how to use it , at least in principle . '' this paper follows lamb s remarks , albeit more in spirit than to the letter . to begin with , it does not seem to be possible to introduce quantum measurement as a primary concept . the reason is the indistinguishability of microscopic objects ( elementary particles ) . it is difficult to imagine how measurement could be discussed if one can not tell the measured system from the measurement apparatus and from the observer . _ measurement is limited to macroscopic interactions under conditions of distinguishability . _ quantum measurement as a formal concept may therefore only emerge as an _ approximation _ within a fully developed theory of microscopic interactions``rules of calculation '' first , `` measurement '' second . furthermore , quantum measurement is much more dependent on fundamental interactions available in nature , and on limitations of the human observer , than it is commonly acknowleged . the only kind of interaction available to human beings without use of auxiliary quantum systems as measurement apparata is the electromagnetic one . it is a long - range interaction , which acts at distances where all short - range interactions may be neglected . the latter remain hidden inside macroscopic devices , being responsible for their observable properties . it is the chierarchy of characteristic interaction lengths in nature that is ultimately responsible for the very existence of the macroscopic world , as perceived by a human observer . the critical distinction to be made in a quantum measurement theory is between _ the observed _ and _ the inferred_. no particular macroscopic experiment gives full access to the underlying quantum dynamics ( nor is this access necessary think of quarks and gluons in quantum optics ) . one should therefore distinguish the directly _ measured _ mesoscopic quantities , and the microscopic ones , the properties of which may only be _ inferred _ from the experimental data ( we remind that we treat `` mesoscopic '' and `` macroscopic '' as synonyms , cf . endnote @xcite ) . we call measurable quantities _ mesoscopic coordinates _ of the quantum system in question . real macroscopic experiments give access to properties of mesoscopic coordinates , thus allowing one only a fairly obscured and limited view of microscopic quantum dynamics . it is therefore not surprising that certain properties of mesoscopic coordinates ( notably , those associated with propagation of quantum information in macroscopic experiments ) turn out to be classical no matter what . given the actual set of fundamental interactions in nature , mesoscopic coordinates of real devices may only be electromagnetic . however , the idea of separation of the macroscopic and microscopic levels of insight is not confined to quantum mechanics , nor to electrodynamics , nor is it anything new . it underlies thermodynamics , whether classical or quantum . it may also be found in any case where some kind of `` coarse - grained '' description is introduced ( e.g. , in hydrodynamics ) . sometimes our view of a particular quantum system is obscured to the extent that its quantum properties become fully hidden , and what we see looks perfectly classical . this was exactly the situation before first experimental indications of the underlying quantum world properties of the black - body radiation and of the photoelectric effect emerged in the experiment . we then say that the _ seemingly _ classical entity we are observing is the _ classical doppelganger _ of the quantum system in question . by definition , such classicality is limited to properties of mesoscopic coordinates : an electron can not look classical while an electron current can . a _ classically behaving quantum system _ is a system that has a classical doppelganger ; in other words , it is a system that _ appears _ classical in some experiment . a system that does not behave classically is said to exhibit quantum behaviour ( _ quantum - behaved systems _ ) . an immediate word of caution is in place here . as mentioned in the introduction , we associate `` macroscopic '' and `` microscopic '' with `` distinguishable '' and `` indistinguishable '' , and not with `` large '' and `` small '' . for example , electrons in an epr pair remain indistinguishable until environmental influences , such as collisions with backgroud gas , destroy their entanglement . the epr pair must be regarded a microscopic object , irrespective of how large it becomes over its lifetime ( there is more to this than mere terminology , see below ) . on the other hand , in a hydrogen atom , the electron and proton are distinguishable unless pair creation needs to be taken into account . this allows one to go as far in the theory as the leading ( bethe ) contribution to the lamb shift @xcite ( cf . also endnote @xcite ) . this example also shows that observable quantum effects have two origins : properties of individual quantum particles and their indistinguishability . in this paper , we do not include collisions of distinguishable matter subsystems . `` collision '' is any situation where conditions of distinguishability in a setup vary with time . collisions of elementary particles are obviously covered by this definition . whether one regards the epr pair `` microscopic '' or `` macroscopic '' depends on whether collisions are explicitly accounted for . for purposes of this paper , collisions belong to microscopic dynamics . integration of the latter into our approach remains subject to further work ( there does not seem to be any formal obstacle to that , cf . @xcite ) . one more reservation is in order here . that only the electromagnetic current is observed in real experiments is a limitation of humans , and not a property of quantum mechanics . a creature with the sixth sense of strong interaction would see the world very differently , and require a very different measurement theory . in , we defined a classically behaving quantum system as a system that has a classical doppelganger . in quantum electrodynamics , this implies nonnegativity of the relevant quasiprobability distribution , allowing one to formally interpret it as a probability distribution . so , device @xmath22 in is classically behaving , if the p - functional characterising it is nonnegative , @xmath105 \geq 0 . % } { % \label{eq:57ud}\end{aligned}\]]this does not change the fact that this device is a quantum system , nor does it in any way affect validity of the general quantum formula for p - functionals ( [ eq:52ty ] ) . classically behaving devices interact with the world according to laws of quantum , not classical , electrodynamics . that under macroscopic conditions these two in essence coincide is a _ property _ of the conventional quantum electrodynamics . continuing this logic , `` classical world '' emerges when all devices within reach of the observer are classically behaving . the whole world looked classical to the human observer before first experimental indications of the underlying quantum world properties of the black - body radiation and of the photoelectric effect emerged in the experiment . the above definition of a classically behaving device calls for an extensive comment . this definition obviously depends on what we term `` quantum '' . formal techniques naturally puts the boundary at what we can / cannot _ describe _ in terms of classical stochastic electrodynamics ; this is all what is about . according to such definition , a thermal source of radiation behaves classically ( unlike , e.g. , a kdp crystal ) . this is in agreement with the general distinction between the observed and the inferred . indeed , quantum nature of the thermal radiation is recognised only so far as one attempts to _ explain _ it in some sort of classical dynamical model , and realises futility of all such attempts due to the equidistribution theorem . an important reservation is that the same real system may behave classically in some experiments and exhibit quantum behaviour in others . so , in quantum optics , the output current of a photodetector is commonly treated as a classical stochastic process . a deeper insight reveals that macroscopic currents are antibunched @xcite . the classical doppelganger of a classically behaving device is a classical system introduced regarding ( say ) a conditional probability distribution . this definition is strictly phenomenological ; a dynamical classical model of a classically behaving device is not bound to exist . an example is again the black - body radiation . in certain cases such model may be constructed ; this mostly depends on the degree of insight . so , an ideal mirror may be introduced by postulating boundary conditions for maxwell equations , but an attempt to fully explain properties of real mirrors in classical terms is doomed . as a rule , taking the limit of a classically behaving device does not recover its classical doppelganger . indeed , such limit turns a quantum hamilton evolution into a classical hamilton one . the latter is not stochastic . thus all dynamical noises ( such as shot noise ) will be lost . the noises associated with quantum averaging ( e.g. , thermal noise ) may survive such limit but get distortet ( cf . the thermal p - function of the harmonic oscillator _ versus _ thermal distribution of the classical oscillator @xcite ) . worse still , such limit may not exist , as , for instance , for the black - body radiation . while interpreting planck s curve as a probability distribution makes perfect phenomenological sense . actually , it is not even guarantied that a particular classically behaving device is subject to a semiclassical model . this again depends on the degree of insight . as a nontrivial example we point to the linear response theory of the dirac vacuum in @xcite . in the first nonvanishing approximation , vacuum polarisation may be calculated , with the necessary regularisation and renormalisation , solely as a property of free fermions . corrections of higher order would involve quantised electromagnetic field as part of the dynamical model . ) , `` intermediate '' ( @xmath106 ) , and `` strict '' ( @xmath107 ) . ] equations ( [ eq:51tx])([eq:55ub ] ) allow one to mix classically and nonclassically behaving devices at will . however , not every such mix is a `` measurement '' . the latter implies existence of a `` classical observer '' , who is only capable of interacting with `` classical measurement apparata '' ( cf . ) . in physical terms , these are classically behaving devices , but this is not enough . for a set - up to become a measurement , it should exhibit the _ quantum - classical boundary _ and contain _ macroscopic detectors . _ indeed , consider the flow of information in . the observer interacts with a computer , which controls the laser source , and processes infomation coming from the photodetector . the latter detects radiation of the quantum system pumped by the laser . devices encircled by solid lines are classically behaving ; similarly , electromagnetic radiation in a classical state is depicted schematically by solid lines with arrows . the quantum system is encircled by dashed line ; its radiation , which may be in a quantum state , is shown as dashed arrow . possible positions of the quantum - classical boundary in this set - up are shown by thick dotted lines . the `` minimal '' boundary separates the observer from the rest of the world , the `` intermediate '' one separates the observer and computer from the laser , detector and quantum system . the `` strict '' quantum - classical boundary separates the system and the detector from the rest the world which in this case includes the observer . what is shared by all three is that the observer is always on one side of the boundary , while the system _ and the detector_on the other . for a classically behaving device to be a detector , its output radiation must be in a classical state irrespective of the state of the detected radiation . this is only possible if the detector adds noise of its own , such as shot noise of real photodetectors . the same requirement may be put as that the _ compound device _ comprising the quantum system and the detector be a classically behaving one . treating the quantum system and the detector as an entity turns the measurement setup into a `` classical world '' . positioning of possible quantum - classical boundaries in depends on assumptions about the devices . if the laser radiation were in a quantum state , the strict quantum - classical boundary would shift to the `` intermediate '' one . in the future where the controlling device may be a quantum computer , the only possible choice of the quantum - classical boundary may become the `` minimal '' one . however , even in this future the observer will interact with what he perceives as a classically behaving device . in conclusion , quantum theory of the electromagnetic interaction under macroscopic conditions of distinguishability of devices and of controlled actions and back - actions between them is constructed . this theory is shown to be subject to `` doing quantum electrodynamics while thinking classically '' , allowing one to substitute essentally classical considerations for quantum ones without any loss in generality . implications of these results for the quantum measurement theory are discussed . as we have already mentioned , eq . ( [ eq:38aw ] ) is consistent only due to causality properties of the p - functionals . here is a simple example . assume that all quantities in ( [ eq:38aw ] ) do not depend on time . the external field shifts the gaussian distribution of the current , @xmath108 , \end{aligned}}}% \label{eq:3zz}\end{aligned}\]]where @xmath109 and @xmath110 are real constants . in place of ( [ eq:37av ] ) we postulate a scalar formula , @xmath111where @xmath112 is one more real constant . for the `` dressed current '' we find , @xmath113 . \end{aligned}}}% \label{eq:5ab}\end{aligned}\]]this function is not normalised , @xmath114and can not be a probability distribution for anything . to see how causality breaks this vicious circle of same - time interactions consider another simple example . we generalise ( [ eq:3zz ] ) to two currents , @xmath115 . \hspace{0.4\columnwidth}\hspace{-0.4\twocolumnwidth } \label{eq:7ad}\end{gathered}\]]the primed current preceds the unprimed one in time ; therefore it may affect the latter but not _ vice versa_. same - time interactions are not allowed either . the simplest case of such interaction is , @xmath116for the dressed currents we then have , @xmath117 . \hspace{0.4\columnwidth}\hspace{-0.4\twocolumnwidth } \label{eq:8ae}\end{gathered}\]]unlike ( [ eq:5ab ] ) , this function is normalised , @xmath118it is therefore a genuine two - dimensional conditional probability distribution for a correlated pair of currents . the order of integrations in ( [ eq:9af ] ) is chosen so as to make the result obvious . indeed , ( [ eq:8ae ] ) has the structure , @xmath119where @xmath120 , \\ p ' \big ( j ' \big | a_{\mathrm{e } } ' \big ) & = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\ , j_0 } % \\ \times \exp \bigg [ -\frac { \big ( j ' - \chi a_{\mathrm{e } } ' \big)^2 } { 2 j_0 ^ 2 } \bigg ] . \end{aligned}}}% \label{eq:13al}\end{aligned}\]]the later current is conditional on the earlier one and the external field . the earlier current is conditional only on the external field . similar structures should emerge for any time sequence of currents irrespective of any detals of the interaction . the only requirement is that each current depends only on those preceding it in time , and not on itself . in real problems with continuous time , critical for cancellation of same - time interactions are _ regularisations_. so , in , _ causal regularisation _ was applied to the retarded green function of the emerging equation for phase - space amplitudes . this made noise sources present in the said equation independent of the amplitudes at the same time , resulting in the ito calculus being chosen . the effect of causal regularisation is thus twofold : to introduce an infinitesimal delay into the phase - space equation , which is in essence time discretisation , and to prevent same - time interactions . a conceptual connection between the above simple examples and the causal regularisation is obvious . an example of causal regularisation applied to a relativistic problem is the linear response theory of the dirac vacuum in @xcite , see also @xcite . further discussion of this issue is outside the scope of this paper . here we reiterate the relevant results of @xcite . for purposes of this appendix , we assume to be , @xmath121while interaction ( [ eq:36 mm ] ) suffices for all physical purposes , interaction ( [ eq:25ah ] ) leads to a more symmetric formulation . in paper @xcite a covariant formulation was used . adapting its results to interaction ( [ eq:25ah ] ) requires a certain amount of care . for simplicity , we assume ( anyway @xmath122 must disappear in a nonrelativistic formulation ) . equally trivial replacements apply to the arguments of functions . the obvious part of adapting @xcite thus is , @xmath123to identify more subtle replacements we compare formulae for the s - matrix . dropping the sources , the s - matrix associated with interaction ( [ eq:25ah ] ) is , @xmath124the corresponding formula in @xcite reads , ( with ) @xmath125where condensed notation ( [ eq:3vs ] ) is redefined according to the covariant standard , @xmath126 . % } { % \label{eq:56br}\end{aligned}\]]changed sign of the exponent leads to redefinition of the retarded propagator , @xmath127this implies correspondences ( [ eq:57bs ] ) . for more details on sign and factor conventions in nonrelativistic and relatistic approaches see appendix c.1 in @xcite . the simplest way of adapting the formulae of is thus to change the metric signature from to . this leads to replacements , @xmath128for all occurences of these kinds of condensed notation . combined with ( [ eq:57bs ] ) , this allows one to adapt any formula in @xcite to interaction ( [ eq:25ah ] ) . we work in the _ closed - time - loop _ formalism of the quantum field theory @xcite . the system is described by the double - time - ordered averages of the heisenberg field and current operators , ( are arbitrary integers ) @xmath129where are the forward and reverse time orderings ( often denoted @xmath56 and @xmath130 ) . by definition , bosonic operators commute under all kinds of ordering . we note in passing that definition ( [ eq:10bu ] ) may cause mathematical problems , see the concluding remark in appendix a1 in @xcite . averages of quantities ( [ eq:10bu ] ) are conveniently accessed through their characteristic functional , @xmath131 \\&\quad = \langle t_- \exp ( -i{\eta}_- { \hat{\mathcal e } } -i{\zeta}_- { \hat{\mathcal d } } ) t_+ \exp ( i{\eta}_+ { \hat{\mathcal e } } + i{\zeta}_+ { \hat{\mathcal d } } ) \rangle \label{eq:51zc}\end{aligned}\]]where @xmath132 and @xmath133 are auxiliary complex c - number functions , and c.v . ( short for _ causal variables _ ) refers to the set of _ response substitutions _ @xcite , @xmath134the symbols @xmath135 denote separation of the frequency - positive and negative parts as per eq . ( [ eq:07pa ] ) . the averaging in ( [ eq:51zc ] ) is over the initial ( heisenberg ) state of the system ( [ eq:40bj ] ) . we remind that the initial state of the field is vacuum , cf . . in terms of @xcite , this means that . the corresponding argument of is redundant and has been omitted . note also that the choice of signs in ( [ eq:51zc ] ) matches ( [ eq:55bq ] ) . the critical property of functional ( [ eq:51zc ] ) is that it depends only on sums of the external sources and the corresponding auxiliary variables , and @xcite , @xmath136 % % \\ = \phi \big [ \eta , \zeta \big | 0,0 \big | j_{\mathrm{e}}+j_{\mathrm{e } } , a_{\mathrm{e}}+a_{\mathrm{e } } \big ] . \label{eq:29fl}\end{aligned}\]]alternatively , @xmath136 % % \\ = \phi \big [ \eta , \zeta \big | j_{\mathrm{e}}+j_{\mathrm{e } } , a_{\mathrm{e}}+a_{\mathrm{e } } \big | 0,0 \big ] . \label{eq:38fv}\end{aligned}\]]these relations are a generalisation of _ consistency conditions _ derived in . equations ( [ eq:29fl ] ) and ( [ eq:38fv ] ) express the same functional but much differ in their interpretation . equation ( [ eq:29fl ] ) introduces the formal _ response viewpoint _ , the one we mostly adhere to in this paper . equation ( [ eq:38fv ] ) shows that , mathematically , external c - number sources in quantum equations of motion are redundant : information contained in the heisenberg operators conditional on the sources is already present in the operators defined without the sources . this allows one to reintroduce response viewpoint without relying on sources . for a discussion see . in view of eq . ( [ eq:29fl ] ) we may set the redundant auxiliary variables to zero , @xmath137this does not lead to any loss of generality ( assuming the souces may be arbitrary , cf . ) . complete quantum formulae may be recovered replacing , @xmath138under ( [ eq:24fe ] ) , the formal description of the system is given by the reduced characteristic functional , @xmath139 % \\ = \phi \big [ \eta , \zeta \big | 0,0 \big | j_{\mathrm{e } } , a_{\mathrm{e } } \big ] . \end{aligned}}}% \label{eq:77jn}\end{aligned}\]]we _ postulate _ this functional to be the characteristic one for the the time - normal averagea of the quantised current and field , @xmath140 = \protect \langle { \mathcal t}{\mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\exp ( i\eta \protect{\hat{\mathcal a}}+ i \zeta \protect{\hat{\mathcal j } } ) { \mbox{\rm\boldmath$:$}}\rangle . % } { % \label{eq:26aj}\end{aligned}\]]the heisenberg operators depend on the sources by construction . postulating ( [ eq:26aj ] ) recovers the beyond - the - rwa definition of the time - normal ordering @xcite ; cf . . full electromagnetic properties of the quantum device may be expressed by the properties of the heisenberg ( `` dressed '' ) current operator . the latter are contained in the functional , @xmath141 = \phi \big [ 0 , \zeta \big | 0 , a_{\mathrm{e } } \big ] . \label{eq:52zd}\end{aligned}\]]namely @xcite , @xmath142 % % \\ = \exp \big ( i\eta g_{\text{r } } j_{\mathrm{e } } \big ) % \\ \times \phi_{\mathrm{m } } \big [ \zeta+\eta g_{\text{r } } \big | a_{\mathrm{ext } } \big ] , \label{eq:53ze}\end{aligned}\]]where is the natural combinations of the sources , @xmath143with , is nothing but a compact form of . nontrivial part of perturbative calculations is expressed by the `` dressing formula '' ( [ eq:54zf ] ) . the no - sources definitions of the functionals and read , @xmath144 & = \protect \langle t_-\exp ( -i{\zeta}_- \protect{\hat{\mathcal j } } ) t_+\exp ( i{\zeta}_+ \protect{\hat{\mathcal j } } ) \rangle |_{a_{\mathrm{e}}=0 } , \label{eq:22sr}\\ \phi_{\mathrm{m}}^{\mathrm{i } } [ \zeta | a_{\mathrm{e } } ] & = \protect \langle t_-\exp ( -i{\zeta}_- \hat j ) t_+\exp ( i{\zeta}_+ \hat j ) \rangle , \label{eq:62zq}\end{aligned}\]]cf . the `` immediate reservation '' at the end of . consequently , rigorous formal definitions of and are given by , ( [ eq:22sr ] ) and ( [ eq:24st ] ) , ( [ eq:62zq ] ) , respectively . to account for the linear susceptibility of matter in properties of the field , it suffices to replace defining functional by , @xmath145 & = \protect \langle t_-\exp ( -i{\zeta}_- \hat j ) t_+\exp ( i{\zeta}_+ \hat j ) \rangle , % } { % \label{eq:75uy}\end{aligned}\]]where @xmath146 \rangle . % } { % \label{eq:76uz}\end{aligned}\ ] ] implies substitution ( [ eq:23ss ] ) . then , for passive linear media , @xmath147 = 1 . % } { % \label{eq:77va}\end{aligned}\]]susceptibility may be accounted for by including it in the dyson equation for the retarded propagator , cf . appendix d.1.2 in @xcite , or by any other method one would care to employ . for interacting devices , redefinition ( [ eq:75uy ] ) extends to individual devices , @xmath148 \\&\quad = \protect \langle t_-\exp ( -i{\zeta}_- \hat j_a ) t_+\exp ( i{\zeta}_+ \hat j_a ) \rangle , \\ & \pi _ { \mathrm{r}a}(t , t ' ) = \frac{i}{\hbar } \theta(t - t ' ) \protect \langle [ \hat j_a(t),\hat j_a(t ' ) ] \rangle , \end{aligned } \label{eq:80vd}\end{aligned}\]]and similarly for device @xmath23 . the all - important persists , with susceptibility of matter being a sum of those of devices , @xmath149as expected . if a particular device ( say , @xmath23 ) is a linear passive one , it is fully accounted for in and may be excluded from the explicit consideration , @xmath150 = 1 . % } { % \label{eq:81ve}\end{aligned}\ ] ] redefinition ( [ eq:75uy ] ) is not compulsory , nor is ( [ eq:80vd ] ) , nor does anything preclude one from applying ( [ eq:80vd ] ) selectively , only to certain devices . the latter may be a matter of physical clarity . for example , for a coherent linear quantum amplifier , separates its amplification properties ( expressed by the imaginary part of ) from its noise properties ( accounted for in ) . in quantum mechanics , these two properties are connected @xcite . formally separating them is not an error , but may obscure the physical picture . for simplicity we confine the discussion to current . as a starting point we employ eq . ( 56 ) of preprint @xcite . with dropped sources , reduced to current and adapted to the present notation it reads , @xmath151 % \nonumber\\ & & = \exp\bigg ( -\frac{i\hbar}{2}\frac{\delta } { \delta a_+ } g _ { \mathrm{f } } \frac{\delta } { \delta a_+ } + \frac{i\hbar}{2}\frac{\delta } { \delta a_- } g_{\mathrm{f}}^ * \frac{\delta } { \delta a_- } \nonumber \\ & \quad -i\hbar \frac{\delta } { \delta a_- } g^{(+ ) } \frac{\delta } { \delta a_+ } \bigg ) \nonumber\\ & \qquad \times \phi_{\mathrm{m}}^{\mathrm{i } } \bigg [ \frac { a_+ } { \hbar } + \zeta_+ , \frac { a_- } { \hbar } + \zeta_- \bigg]\big| _ { a_{\pm}=0 } , \label{eq:86au } % % \nonumber % % \z \end{aligned}\]]where and are defined by and ( [ eq:62zq ] ) , are auxilliary functions , and the kernels and are the so - called contractions , @xmath152we use an obvious extension of notation ( [ eq:76nu ] ) . originates in wick s theorem . for details see @xcite . adapting manipulations ( [ eq:95fm])([eq:65bj ] ) to results in the closed - time - loop prototype of , @xmath151 & = \exp\bigg ( -i\hbar\frac{\delta } { \delta a_+ } g _ { \mathrm{f } } \frac{\delta } { \delta a_+ ' } + i\hbar\frac{\delta } { \delta a_- } g_{\mathrm{f}}^ * \frac{\delta } { \delta a_- ' } % \nonumber \\ & \quad -i\hbar \frac{\delta } { \delta a_- } g^{(+ ) } \frac{\delta } { \delta a_+ ' } -i\hbar \frac{\delta } { \delta a_- ' } g^{(+ ) } \frac{\delta } { \delta a_+ } \bigg ) \nonumber\\ & \quad \times \phi_{\mathrm{m}a } \bigg [ \frac { a_+ } { \hbar } + \zeta_+ , \frac { a_- } { \hbar } + \zeta_- \bigg ] \phi_{\mathrm{m}b } \bigg [ \frac { a_+ ' } { \hbar } + \zeta_+ , \frac { a_- ' } { \hbar } + \zeta_- \bigg ] \big| _ { a_{\pm}=a_{\pm}'=0 } , \label{eq:73uw}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we also used symmetry of . its structure is illustrated symbolically in a. to recover ( [ eq:66bk ] ) , ( [ eq:23ss ] ) should be supplemented by two more substitutions @xcite , @xmath153this turns ( [ eq:73uw ] ) into , @xmath154 & = \exp \bigg ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } '' } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta ' } -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{e } } ' } g_{\text{r } } \frac{\delta } { \delta \zeta '' } \bigg ) % % \np \times \phi_{\mathrm{m}a } [ \zeta + \zeta ' a_{\mathrm{e } } + a_{\mathrm{e } } ' ] % % \np \times \phi_{\mathrm{m}b } [ \zeta+ \zeta '' a_{\mathrm{e } } + a_{\mathrm{e } } '' ] |_{\zeta ' = \zeta''= a_{\mathrm{e}}'=a_{\mathrm{e}}''=0 } , % } { % \label{eq:74ux}\end{aligned}\]]which is equivalent to ( [ eq:66bk ] ) . the generalised photodetection problem ( a ) is the only case in the paper when the single - mode approximation must be lifted . it suffices to assume that the electromagnetic field comprises two modes , and , where i , o refer to the _ input _ and _ output _ of the photodetector . all other quantities are similarly doubled , , etc . ; applies with . we shall also refer to the input and output modes as the optical and photocurrent ones . at this stage , all such terms are conditional . adapted to two modes , becomes , @xmath155 & = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i } } ] \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{o } } ] \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i } } ] \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_{b\mathrm{o } } ] \delta [ \mathcal{j}_{\mathrm{i}}-\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}}-\mathcal{j}_{b\mathrm{i } } ] \delta [ \mathcal{j}_{\mathrm{o}}-\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{o}}-\mathcal{j}_{b\mathrm{o } } ] \nonumber\\&\quad \times p_a[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}},\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{o } } | a_{\mathrm{ei}}+g_{\mathrm{ri}}\mathcal{j}_{b\mathrm{i}},a_{\mathrm{eo}}+g_{\mathrm{ro}}\mathcal{j}_{b\mathrm{o } } ] p_b[\mathcal{j}_{b\mathrm{i}},\mathcal{j}_{b\mathrm{o } } | a_{\mathrm{ei}}+g_{\mathrm{ri}}\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}},a_{\mathrm{eo}}+g_{\mathrm{ro}}\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{o } } ] , % } { % \label{eq:60pw}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , @xmath156 , \\ g_{\mathrm{r}{\mathrm{o}}}(t - t ' ) & = \frac{i}{\hbar } \theta(t - t ' ) \big [ \hat a_{{\mathrm{o}}}(t),\hat a_{{\mathrm{o}}}(t ' ) \big ] . \end{aligned } \label{eq:54at}\end{aligned}\]]the only assumption made when obtaining ( [ eq:60pw ] ) is that and commute equation ( [ eq:60pw ] ) is not yet a photodetection formula . it is symmetric with respect to the modes , as well as to the devices ; electromagnetic interaction in it is bi - directional . it also contains a lot of irrelevant information , in particular , full quantum response properties of the input and output fields . it `` knows '' how an attempt to measure the input field would affect the detection , and how simultaneous measurements of the input field and output current would be correlated ( say ) . subject to valid quantum models of the devices , it is also `` aware '' of all limitations imposed by quantum mechanics on such simultaneous measurements . to suppress the irrelevant information we limit our attention to the quantity , @xmath157 = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_{\mathrm{i}}]\,p [ \mathcal{j}_{\mathrm{i}},\mathcal{j}_{\mathrm{o } } | 0 , 0 ] . % } { % \label{eq:62py}\end{aligned}\]]that is , we do not attempt to measure the `` optical '' current , nor to probe the system by radiation in either mode . in fact , it would be easy to preserve as an argument , thus covering photodetection with local oscillators , but we are not currently interested in such generalisation . the critical assumption turning device @xmath22 ( say ) into a source is that it is not sensitive to the incoming field in either mode , @xmath158 \approx p_a[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}},\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{o } } | 0,0 ] . % } { % \label{eq:63pz}\end{aligned}\]]we shall also assume that its contribution to the photocurrent may be neglected , @xmath159 p_{\mathrm{s}}[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}}]\,\delta [ \mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{o } } ] , \label{eq:64qa}\end{gathered}\]]where @xmath160 = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{o}}]\,p_a[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}},\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{o } } | 0,0 ] . % } { % \label{eq:66qc}\end{aligned}\]]combining ( [ eq:60pw ] ) , ( [ eq:62py ] ) , ( [ eq:63pz ] ) , and ( [ eq:64qa ] ) we obtain , @xmath161 = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}}]\,p_{\mathrm{s}}[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}}]\,p_{\mathrm{d}}[\mathcal{j}_{\mathrm{o}}|g_{\mathrm{ri}}\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i } } ] , % } { % \label{eq:67qd}\end{aligned}\]]where @xmath162 = \int \mathcal{d}[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}}]\,p_b[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}},\mathcal{j}_{\mathrm{o } } | a_{\mathrm{i}},0 ] . % } { % \label{eq:68qe}\end{aligned}\]]classical collocations of are unmistakeable . it could be guessed from the very beginning . the actual result of this appendix are and ( [ eq:68qe ] ) . they define properties of the source and detector in strictly quantum terms , including _ quantisation of the photocurrent_. to establish a closer connection with , we introduce the characteristic functional of averages ( [ eq:13sf ] ) . the operator occuring there should be identified with , defined within the model of solitary device @xmath22 . this way , @xmath163\,p_{\mathrm{s}}[\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i}}]\,\exp ( i\eta g_{\mathrm{ri}}\mathcal{j}_{a\mathrm{i } } ) . % } { % \label{eq:70qh}\end{aligned}\]]the additional subscript 0 stands for the condition , @xmath164functional ( [ eq:70qh ] ) is a formal expression of the source@xmath165field entity , encircled in the dashed oval in a. with it , eq . ( [ eq:67qd ] ) may be rewritten as , @xmath157 = \phi _ { \mathrm{s } } \big ( -i\frac{\delta } { \delta a_{\mathrm{ei } } } \big ) p_{\mathrm{d}}[\mathcal{j}_{\mathrm{o}}|a_{\mathrm{ei}}]|_{a_{\mathrm{ei}}=0 } . % } { % \label{eq:69qf}\end{aligned}\]]that averages ( [ eq:13sf ] ) indeed fully characterise the source is evident . the term `` mesoscopic '' refers to quantum manifestations under macroscopic conditions . common as it actually is , this term is confusing . it implies that there exists something `` else '' that distinguishes macroscopic and mesoscopic conditions . in fact , there is nothing `` else '' apart from the hard - working experimental physicist , rescuing fragile quantum effects from being destroyed by environmental and measurement noises . we regard these terms as synonyms , with a tendency to apply `` macroscopic '' to experiment and `` mesoscopic''to theory ( as in `` macroscopic experiments are described by mesoscopic phenomenologies '' ) . the actual logic in @xcite was as follows . _ response transformation _ of the closed - time - loop formalism for bosons was firstly constructed in @xcite for the harmonic oscillator , then postulated for interacting bosons in @xcite following analogies with @xcite . this resulted , in particular , in the amended definition of the time - normal ordering . its equivalence to the conventional definition under rwa was then subject to verification . in turn , extention of the results to fermions in @xcite was based on analogies with bosons . we talk about _ an _ ultimate generalisation because there exist alternative phase - space mappings , based on orderings other than time - normal @xcite . for a discussion of comparative merits of different mappings see the quoted paper . the distinction between the mesoscopic and microscopic coordinates is very much blurred for linear bosonic systems . this results , we believe , in a lot of confusion , because such systems are commonly used as a testing ground for fundamental concepts . for pedagogical reasons , we oversimplify the discussion of photodetection in section [ ch:61np ] , brushing under the carpet a number of physically important points . we therefore strongly recommend the reader to give proper attention to appendix [ ch : phdet ] . we do not claim that description of the electromagnetic field binding the electron to proton in terms of running waves is _ useful _ , only that it is _ formally possible_. all practical approaches we are aware of depart from such viewpoint . Abstract:
[ "quantum electrodynamics under conditions of distinguishability of interacting matter entities , and of controlled actions and back - actions between them , is considered . such `` mesoscopic quantum electrodynamics '' is shown to share its dynamical structure with the classical stochastic electrodynamics . in formal terms , we demonstrate that all general relations of the mesoscopic quantum electrodynamics may be recast in a form lacking planck s constant . mesoscopic quantum electrodynamics is therefore subject to `` doing quantum electrodynamics while thinking classically '' , allowing one to substitute essentally classical considerations for quantum ones without any loss in generality . implications of these results for the quantum measurement theory are discussed ." ]
18,042
18,042
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: rna is an important biopolymer critical to all living systems @xcite and may be the crucial entity in prebiotic evolution @xcite . like for dna , there are four types of nucleotides ( or bases ) a , c , g , and u which , when polymerized can form double helical structures consisting of stacks of stable watson - crick pairs ( a with u or g with c ) . however unlike a long polymer of dna , which is often accompanied by a complementary strand and forms otherwise featureless double helical structures , a polymer of rna usually `` operates '' in the single - strand mode . it bends onto itself and forms elaborate spatial structures in order for bases located on different parts of the backbone to pair with each other , similar conceptually to how the sequence of an amino acid encodes the structure of a protein . understanding the encoding of structure from the primary sequence has been an outstanding problem of theoretical biophysics . most theoretical work in the past decade have been focused on the problem of protein folding , which is very difficult analytically and numerically @xcite . here , we study the problem of rna folding , specifically the formation of rna _ secondary structures_. for rna , the restriction to secondary structures is meaningful due to a separation of energy scales . it is this restriction that makes the rna folding problem amenable to detailed analytical and numerical studies @xcite . there exist efficient algorithms to compute the exact partition function of rna secondary structures @xcite . together with the availability of carefully measured free energy parameters @xcite describing the formation of various microscopic structures ( e.g. , stacks , loops , hairpins , etc . ) , the probable secondary structures formed by any given rna molecule of up to a few thousand bases can be obtained readily . on the experimental side , rna molecules of @xmath1 @xmath2 bases in length are available . furthermore , the restriction to secondary structures can be physically enforced in a salt solution with monovalent ions , e.g. , @xmath3 , so that controlled experiments are in principle possible @xcite . in this work , we are not concerned with the structure formed by a specific sequence . instead , we will study the statistics of secondary structures formed by the ensemble of _ long _ _ random _ rna sequences ( of at least a few thousand bases in length in practice ) . such knowledge may be of value in detecting important structural components in messenger rnas which may otherwise be regarded as random from the structural perspective , in understanding how functional rnas arise from random rna sequences @xcite , or in characterizing the response of a long single - stranded dna molecule to external pulling forces @xcite . more significantly from the theoretical point of view , the rna secondary structure problem presents a rare tractable model of a random heteropolymer where concrete progress can be made regarding the thermodynamic properties @xcite . nevertheless , there are many gaps in our understanding . this paper is a detailed report of our on - going effort in this regard . it provides a self - contained introduction of the random rna problem to statistical physicists as a novel problem of disordered systems , and depicts several approaches we have tried to characterize this system . the manuscript is organized as follows : in sec . [ sec_secondarystructure ] , we provide a detailed introduction to the phenomenology of rna secondary structure formation . we review the key simplifications which form the basis of efficient computing as well as exact solutions in some cases . we also review the properties of the molten phase " , which is the simplest possible phase of the system assuming sequence disorder is not relevant . in sec . [ sec_randomnesshight ] , we consider the effect of sequence disorder at high temperatures . we show numerical evidence that the random rna sequence is in the molten phase at sufficiently high temperatures , and support this conclusion by solving the two - replica system which can be regarded as a perturbative study on the stability of the molten phase . in sec . [ sec_randomnesslowt ] , we provide a scaling argument , and show why the molten phase should break down at low enough temperatures . this is followed by a detailed numerical study of the low temperature regime . we apply the droplet picture and characterize the statistics of large - scale , low - energy excitations of the secondary structures from the ground state structure . our results support the existence of a very weak ( i.e. , marginal ) glass phase characterized by logarithmic excitation energies . finally , we describe the intermediate temperature regime where the system makes the transition from the glass phase to the molten phase . the solution of the two - replica problem is relegated to the appendices . we present two approaches : in appendix [ app_intuitive ] , we provide a mapping of the two - replica problem to the denaturation of an effective single rna in @xmath0-dimensional embedding space ; this approach highlights the connection of the rna problem to the self - consistent hartree theory and should be most natural to field theorists . in appendices [ app_solution ] and [ app_derivez1 ] , we present the exact solution . it is hoped that the two - replica solution may be helpful in providing the intuition needed to tackle the full @xmath4-replica problem . the secondary structure of an rna describes the configuration of base pairings formed by the polymer . if the pairing of the @xmath5 and @xmath6 bases in a polymer of @xmath7 total bases is denoted by @xmath8 with @xmath9 , then each secondary structure @xmath10 is defined by a list of such pairings , with each position appearing at most once in the list , and with the pairs subject to a certain restriction to be described shortly below . each such structure can be represented by a diagram as shown in fig . [ fig_diagrams ] , where the solid line symbolizes the backbone of the molecule and the dashed lines stand for base pairings . the structure shown can be divided into _ stems _ of consecutive base pairs and _ loops _ which connect or terminate these stems . in naturally occurring rna molecules , the stems typically comprise on the order of five base pairs . they locally form the same double helical structure as dna molecules . however , while the latter typically occur in complementary pairs and bind to each other , rna molecules are mostly single - stranded and hence must fold back onto themselves in order to gain some base pairings . by a secondary structure , one often considers only the restricted set of base pairings where any two base pairs @xmath8 and @xmath11 in a given secondary structure are either independent , i.e. , @xmath12 , or nested , i.e. , @xmath13 . this excludes the so - called pseudo - knots ( as exemplified by fig . [ fig_pseudoknot ] ) and makes analytical and numerical studies much more tractable . for an rna molecule , the exclusion of pseudo - knots is a reasonable approximation because the long pseudo - knots are kinetically difficult to form , and even the short ones occur infrequently in natural rna structures @xcite . the latter is due to their relatively low binding energies for short sequences and the strong electrostatic repulsion of the backbone because the polymer backbone is highly charged and pseudo - knotted configurations increase the density of the molecule , their formation can be relatively disfavored in low salt solution . similarly , the tertiary structures which involve additional interactions of paired bases are strongly dependent on electrostatic screening and can be turned off " experimentally by using monovalent salt solution @xcite . indeed , the pseudo - knots are often deemed part of the tertiary structure of an rna molecule . throughout this study , we will exclude pseudo - knots in our definition of secondary structures . without the pseudo - knots , a secondary structure can alternatively be represented by a diagram of non - crossing arches or by a mountain " diagram as shown in fig . [ fig_strreps ] . : in ( a ) the solid line symbolizes the stretched out backbone of the molecule while the dashed arches stand for the base pairs formed . due to the no pseudo - knot constraint two arches never cross . ( b ) shows an equivalent representation as a `` mountain diagram '' . it is a line derived from the arch diagram by going along the backbone from left to right and going one step up for every beginning arch , horizontally for each unbound base , and one step down for each ending arch . such a mountain always stays above the baseline and comes back to the baseline at base @xmath7 . ] in order to calculate boltzmann factors within an ensemble of secondary structures , we need to assign an energy @xmath14 $ ] to each structure @xmath10 . each secondary structure can be decomposed into elementary pieces such as the stems of base pairs and the connecting loop regions as shown in fig . [ fig_diagrams ] . a common approach is to assume that the contributions from these structural elements to the total energy are independent of each other and additive . within a stem of base pairs , the largest energy contribution is the _ stacking energy _ between two adjacent base pairs ( g - c , a - u , or g - u ) , and the total energy of the stem is the sum of stacking energies over all adjacent base pairs . since each secondary structure is defined as a _ single _ state in our ensemble , it is necessary to integrate out all other microscopic degrees of freedom of the bases within a given secondary structure and use an effective energy parameter for each base stacking . the most convenient one to use is the gibbs free energy of stacking @xcite , which contains an enthalpic term due to base stacking , and an entropic term due to the loss of single - stranded degrees of freedom ( as well as the additional conformational change of the backbone and even the surrounding water molecules ) due to base pairing . the magnitudes of these stacking free energies actually depend on the identity of all four bases forming the two base pairs bracketing the stack and are dependent on temperature themselves . while their typical values are on the order of @xmath15 at room temperature , the enthalpic and entropic contributions are each on the order of @xmath16 . thus , upon moderately increasing the temperature from room temperature to about @xmath17 , the stacking free energies become repulsive and the rna molecule denatures . the stacking free energies account for most but not all of the entropic terms for a given secondary structure . there is an additional ( logarithmic ) `` loop energy '' term associated with the entropy loss of each _ closed loop _ of single - stranded rna formed by the secondary structure , as well as the energy necessary to bend the single strand . all of these energy parameters have been measured in great detail @xcite . when incorporated into an efficient dynamic programming algorithm ( to be described below ) , they can rather successfully _ predict _ the secondary structures of many rna molecules of up to several hundred bases in length @xcite . in this paper , we investigate the statistical properties of long , random rna sequences far below the denaturation temperature . we are interested in generic issues such as the existence of a glass phase and various scaling properties . guided by experiences with other disordered systems @xcite , we believe these generic properties of the system should not depend on the specific choice of the model details . since the full model used in refs @xcite makes analytical and numerical studies unnecessarily clumsy , we will examine a number of simplified models , while preserving the most essential feature of the system , namely , the pattern of matches and mismatches between different positions of the sequence . as in the realistic model described above , we choose our reference energy to be the unbound state , so that each unbound base in a secondary structure is assigned the energy @xmath18 . we will neglect the logarithmic loop energy , which is important very close to the denaturation transition @xcite where the average binding energy is close to zero , but not far below the denaturation temperature where most bases are paired . moreover , we will radically simplify the energy rules for base pairing : we neglect the stacking energies and instead associate an interaction energy @xmath19 with every pairing @xmath8 . thus , @xmath20=\sum_{(i , j)\in s}\varepsilon_{i , j}\ ] ] is the total energy of the structure @xmath10 . within this model , it remains to be decided how to choose the energy parameters @xmath19 s . one possibility is to choose each of the bases @xmath21 randomly from the ` alphabet ' set @xmath22 and then assign @xmath23 with @xmath24 being the match or mismatch energy respectively . here , the value of @xmath25 is actually not essential as long as it is repulsive , since the two bases always have the energetically preferred option to not bind at all . thus the energetics of the system is set by @xmath26 . in our numerical study to be reported in secs . [ sec_randomnesshight ] and [ sec_randomnesslowt ] , we will primarily use this model ( as long as it is larger than @xmath27 as explained below ) . indeed the alphabet size and the choice of the matching rule can be used as tuning parameters to change the strength of sequence disorder . but in our study , we choose to minimize the number of parameters and tune the effective strength of disorder by changing temperature . ] with @xmath28 . we will refer to this as the `` sequence disorder '' model . for analytical calculations , it is preferable to treat all the @xmath19 s as _ independent _ identically distributed random variables , i.e. , to assume @xmath29=\prod_{1\le i < j\le n}\rho(\varepsilon_{i , j})\ ] ] for the joint distribution function @xmath30 $ ] of all the @xmath19 s . this choice neglects the correlations between @xmath19 and @xmath31 which are generated through the shared base @xmath32 ; it is an additional approximation on the model ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) . however , we do not anticipate universal quantities to depend on such subtle correlation of the @xmath19 s . this will be tested numerically by comparing the behavior of the model ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) with that of the model defined by eq . ( [ eq_uncorrelated ] ) together with @xmath33 this distribution is chosen to mimic the random sequence model ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) with a 4-letter alphabet , but it does not contain any correlation between the different @xmath19 s . we will refer to this model as defined by eqs . ( [ eq_uncorrelated ] ) and ( [ eq_uncorrelateddisorder ] ) as the `` energy disorder '' model . in the actual analytical calculations , we will go even one step further and take the @xmath19 to be _ gaussian _ random variables specified by @xmath34 where @xmath35 is the average binding energy and @xmath36 is the variance . in this model ( referred to below as gaussian disorder " model , ) the parameter @xmath36 provides us with a convenient measure of the disorder strength . again , universal quantities should not depend on the choice of the distribution functions . we will test this directly by performing numerical studies for these gaussian random energies , with @xmath37 chosen to match the first two moments of the distribution eq . ( [ eq_uncorrelateddisorder ] ) . in contrast to prior numerical studies @xcite , we do not exclude base pairing between neighboring bases @xmath38 , i.e. , we do not set a minimal allowed length for the hairpins . since the results are qualitatively identical to the results of the simpler model presented here , we do not show this data . ] . setting a constraint on the minimal hairpin length would make the analytical study much more cumbersome . however , in the study by pagnani _ et al . _ @xcite , it has been argued that the system will not be frustrated ( and hence will not form a glass ) without this additional constraint . we believe this is an artifact of the 2-letter alphabet used by pagnani _ _ in order to generate the binding energy @xmath19 s via a rule similar to eq . ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) : it is simple to see that for any 2-letter sequence in which the like letters repel and unlike letters attract , one can always find the minimal total binding energy by pairing up neighboring bases of opposite types and removing them from the sequence if no additional constraints such as the minimal hairpin length are enforced . as we will discuss in detail in sec . [ sec_proofglass ] this is not a problem if the alphabet size is larger than 2 . thus , in our study , we use the sequence disorder model with a 4-letter alphabet , or the energy disorder model , without enforcing the minimal hairpin length constraint . while the minimal hairpin length ( of 3 bases ) is known for real rna folding , it should not change the universal properties of long rna sequences . once the energy of each secondary structure is defined , we can study the partition function @xmath39}\ ] ] of the molecule where @xmath40 denotes the set of _ all _ allowed secondary structures of a polymer of @xmath7 bases , and @xmath41 . to calculate this partition function , it is useful to study the _ restricted _ partition function @xmath42 of the substrand from position @xmath43 to position @xmath44 of the rna molecule . given the model ( [ eq_energy ] ) , the restricted partition functions can be split up according to the possible pairings of position @xmath44 . this leads to the recursive equation @xcite @xmath45 with @xmath46 being the total partition function of the molecule . in terms of the arch diagrams introduced in fig . [ fig_strreps](a ) this can be represented as @xmath47{receq.eps}}\ ] ] where the wavy lines stand for the restricted partition functions . this is easily recognized as a hartree equation . since the restricted partition functions on the right hand side of this equation all correspond to shorter pieces of the rna molecule than the left hand side , this equation allows one to calculate the exact partition function of an rna molecule of length @xmath7 with _ arbitrary _ interactions @xmath19 in @xmath48 time . this is accomplished by starting with the partition functions for single bases and recursively applying eq . ( [ eq_partfuncrec ] ) , and is known as a dynamic programming algorithm @xcite . this algorithm allows one to compute numerically the partition function involving all secondary structures , for arbitrary rna molecules of up to @xmath49 bases . it also forms the basis of analytical approaches to the problem as we will see shortly . apart from the partition function itself , we will use additional observables in order to characterize the behavior of rna secondary structures . one such quantity of interest is the binding probability @xmath50 , i.e. , the probability that positions @xmath43 and @xmath44 are paired given the @xmath19 s , @xmath51 where @xmath52 is given by the recursion equation ( [ eq_partfuncrec ] ) and @xmath53 is the partition function of the sequence @xmath54 . the latter can be calculated as the quantity @xmath55 when applying the recursion eq . ( [ eq_partfuncrec ] ) to the duplicated sequence @xmath56 . thus , all @xmath57 such constraint partition functions can be calculated with the same recursion in @xmath48 time . the logarithms @xmath58 of these binding probabilities have a natural interpretation : they can be read as the `` pinching free energies '' , i.e. , as the free energy cost of a pinch between positions @xmath43 and @xmath44 and the unperturbed state . we will make extensive use of this concept of pinched structures in our discussion of the low temperature behavior of rna secondary structures in sec . [ sec_randomnesslowt ] . in our numerical investigations , we will choose as a representative of all the pinching energies for different positions by @xmath59 which is the free energy cost of the largest possible pinch that splits the molecule of length @xmath7 into two pieces of length @xmath60 each . another quantity which describes a secondary structures is its `` size profile '' . as an intrinsic measure of the size of a given secondary structure @xmath10 , we use the `` ladder distance '' @xmath61 between the base at position @xmath62 and the base at position @xmath43 , which is the the number of pairings ( or ladders ) one has to cross to go from a pair involving base @xmath62 to the base @xmath43 ; see fig . [ fig_hdef ] . it can be defined for each secondary structure @xmath10 as the total number of pairings @xmath63 that bracket @xmath43 , i.e. , @xmath64 this quantity can be very easily visualized as the `` height '' at position @xmath43 of the mountain representation of the secondary structure @xmath10 as shown in fig . [ fig_strreps](b ) . a quantity characterizing the full ensemble of secondary structures is the _ thermal average _ @xmath65 of this size profile over all secondary structures with their respective boltzmann factors ; it can be straightforwardly calculated from the probabilities @xmath66 as @xmath67 since we expect all positions in the sequence to behave in a similar way , in our numerics we will summarize the properties of the size profile by the ladder distance from the first to the middle base , i.e. , we will study @xmath68 as a quantity representing the overall `` size '' of an ensemble of secondary structures . of a secondary rna structure : the size profile measures the extension of the structure if drawn as a planar diagram . as an intrinsic definition of @xmath69 which captures this notion of the size of a secondary structure at position @xmath43 , we use the `` ladder distance '' of base @xmath43 from the end of the molecule , i.e. , the number of base pairs which have to be crossed when connecting position @xmath43 to position @xmath62 along the folded structure as indicated by the dashed line . ] if sequence disorder does not play an important role , we may describe the rna molecule by replacing all the binding energies @xmath19 by some effective value @xmath70 . as we will see later , this will be an adequate description of our random rna models at high enough temperatures ( but before denaturation . ) for the real rnas , this provides a coarse grained description of repetitive , self - complementary sequences , e.g. , cagcag ... cag , which are involved in a number of diseases @xcite . we will refer to rna which is well described by this model without sequence disorder as being in the `` molten '' phase . it serves as a starting point for modeling non - specific self - binding of rna molecules , and its properties will form the basis of our study of the random rna at low temperatures . since in the absence of sequence disorder , the energy of a structure @xmath10 depends only on the number of paired bases @xmath71 of this structure , we can write the partition function in the molten phase as @xmath72\ ] ] the partition functions of the sub - strands @xmath42 become translationally invariant and can be written as @xmath73 where @xmath74 is only a function of the length @xmath7 . the recursion equation ( [ eq_partfuncrec ] ) then takes the form @xmath75 where @xmath76 upon introducing the @xmath77-transform @xmath78 the convolution can be eliminated and the recursion equation turns into a quadratic equation @xmath79 with the solution @xmath80 performing the inverse @xmath77-transformation in the saddle point approximation yields the expression @xcite @xmath81 in the limit of large @xmath7 , with the exponent @xmath82 and the non - universal quantities @xmath83 and @xmath84^{1/2}$ ] . this result characterizes the state of the rna where a large number of different secondary structures of equal energy coexist in the thermodynamic ensemble , and the partition function is completely dominated by the configurational entropy of these secondary structures . while the result is derived specifically for the special case @xmath85 , we will argue below that it is applicable also to random @xmath19 s at sufficiently high temperatures , in the sense that for long rna molecules , the partition function is dominated by an exponentially large number of secondary structures all having _ comparable _ energies ( within @xmath86 ) that are smoothly related to each other in configuration space . the latter is what we meant by the `` molten phase '' . the exponent @xmath82 is an example of a scaling exponent characteristic of the molten phase . this and other exponents can be derived in a geometric way by the `` mountain '' representation of secondary structures as illustrated in fig . [ fig_strreps](b ) . each such mountain corresponds to exactly one secondary structure . in the molten phase , the weight of a secondary structure @xmath10 is simply given by @xmath87 . this can be represented in the mountain picture by assigning a weight of @xmath88 to every upward and downward step and a weight of @xmath62 to every horizontal step . since the only constraints on these mountains are ( i ) staying above the baseline , and ( ii ) returning to the baseline at the end , the partition function of an rna of length @xmath7 is then simply that of a random walk of @xmath7 steps , constrained to start from and return to the origin , in the presence of a _ hard wall _ at the origin , with the above weights ( @xmath89 or @xmath62 ) assigned to each allowed step . this partition function is well - known to have the characteristic @xmath90 behavior which we formally derived in the last section @xcite . in this framework , it also becomes obvious why imposing a minimal hairpin length does not change the universal behavior of rna at least in this molten phase : if the minimal allowed size of a hairpin is @xmath91 , this enforces a potentially strong _ penalty _ for the formation of a hairpin , since with every hairpin @xmath91 bases are denied the possibility of gaining energy by base pairing . this tends to make branchings less favorable and thus leads to longer stems . however , this additional constraint translates in the mountain representation into the rule that an upwards step may not be followed by a downwards step within the next @xmath91 steps . this is clearly a _ local _ modification of the random walk . thus , it does not change universal quantities although the above mentioned suppression of branchings will require much longer sequences in order to observe the asymptotic universal behavior . for real rna parameters , the crossover length is very long due to this effect . for example , it is several hundred nucleotides for the cag repeat , and even longer for some other repeats . another characteristic exponent describes the scaling of the ladder size @xmath92 with the sequence length @xmath7 . as already mentioned in its definition ( [ eq_hdef ] ) , @xmath92 is equivalent to the average `` height '' of the mid - point of the sequence in the mountain picture . in the molten phase , the random walk analogy immediately yields the result @xmath93 where @xmath94 denotes ensemble average in the molten phase . as should be clear from the coarse - grained view depicted in fig . [ fig_hdef ] , the ensemble of rna secondary structures in the molten phase can be mapped directly to the ensemble of _ branched polymers_. these branched polymers are _ rooted _ at the bases @xmath95 and @xmath96 of the rna . in this context , @xmath82 is known as the configuration exponent of the rooted branched polymer @xcite . additionally from the result ( [ eq_hscaling ] ) , we see that the ladder length of the branched polymer scales , a well - known result for the branched polymer in the absence of self - avoidance @xcite . ] as @xmath97 . because of the very visual analogy of the secondary structures to branched polymer , we refer to the configurational entropy of the secondary structures as the `` branching entropy '' . finally , the binding probabilities @xmath50 defined in eq . ( [ eq_returnprobability ] ) only depend on the distance @xmath98 in the molten phase , i.e. , @xmath99 . the behavior of this function can be derived explicitly by inserting the result eq . ( [ eq_moltenz ] ) for the partition function into eq . ( [ eq_returnprobability ] ) . alternatively , one just needs to recognize that @xmath100 corresponds in the random walk analogy to the first - return probability of a random walk after @xmath101-steps . in either case , one finds the result @xmath102 i.e. , the return probability decays with the separation @xmath101 of the two bases as a power law with the configuration exponent @xmath82 . for the pinching free energy @xmath103 , we simply set @xmath104 and obtain @xmath105 for large @xmath7 , i.e. , it scales _ logarithmically _ in the molten phase . this logarithmic dependence merely reflects the loss in branching entropy due to the pinching constraint and is a manifestation of the configuration exponent @xmath82 . there are in principle three different scenaria for the behavior of long random rna sequences . ( i ) disorder is irrelevant at any finite temperature , so that the molten phase description presented in sec . [ sec_molten ] applies to long rnas at all temperatures . ( ii ) disorder is relevant at all temperatures , and the molten phase description would be completely inadequate . ( iii ) there is a finite temperature @xmath106 above which the molten description of random rna is correct , while below @xmath106 a qualitatively different description is needed . in accordance with the statistical physics literature , we will refer to the non - molten phase as the glass phase , and @xmath106 as the glass transition . the purpose of the study is to determine which of these three scenaria is actually realized , and to characterize the glass phase if either ( ii ) or ( iii ) is realized . in this section , we study the high temperature behavior and demonstrate that the molten phase is stable with respect to weak sequence disorder . this ensures that the molten description of rna given in sec . [ sec_molten ] is at least valid at high enough temperatures , thereby ruling out scenario ( ii ) . we will address the question of whether there is a glass phase at low but finite temperatures in sec . [ sec_randomnesslowt ] . before we engage in detailed calculations , we want to convince ourselves with the help of some numerics that weak disorder does not destroy the molten phase . to this end , we study the observables introduced in sec . [ sec_observables ] . we generate a large number of disorder configurations , i.e. , interaction energies @xmath19 using the 3 models introduced in sec . [ sec_intenergies ] : sequence disorder , energy disorder , and gaussian disorder as described by eq . ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) , eqs . ( [ eq_uncorrelated ] ) and ( [ eq_uncorrelateddisorder ] ) , and eqs . ( [ eq_uncorrelated ] ) and ( [ eq_gaussiandisorder ] ) respectively , with @xmath107 . then , we calculate the observables @xmath92 and @xmath103 for each disorder configuration at the relatively large temperature of @xmath108 and average the obtained values over many disorder configurations . in order to keep the numerical effort manageable , we average over @xmath109 random sequences for @xmath110 , over @xmath111 sequences for @xmath112 , and over @xmath113 sequences for @xmath114 and @xmath115 . [ fig_moltennumerics ] shows the results ; disorder averaged quantities are denoted by an overline throughout the text . we see that the data for @xmath116 follows a power law with a fitted exponent @xmath117 , with the exponent value decreasing for larger @xmath7 s . this result is consistent with the prediction eq . ( [ eq_hscaling ] ) for the molten phase . also , the pinching free energy follows the predicted logarithmic behavior eq . ( [ eq_moltenpinch ] ) without any noticeable difference between the three choices of disorder . taken together , these results indicate that the three models of disorder belong to the same universality class , i.e. , the molten phase description of the uniformly attracting rna , at high temperatures . of the sequence at @xmath108 . each plot shows data for three different choices of disorder according to eqs . ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) , ( [ eq_uncorrelateddisorder ] ) , and ( [ eq_gaussiandisorder ] ) . ( a ) shows the scaling of the average size @xmath116 and the dashed line is the best fit @xmath117 to a power law . ( b ) shows the free energy of the largest pinch as defined in ( [ eq_largestpinchfreeenergy ] ) . the dashed line is up to an additive constant the logarithmic behavior @xmath118 predicted in eq . ( [ eq_moltenpinch ] ) . the statistical fluctuations are smaller than the size of the symbols in both plots . all plots suggest that the behavior of rna secondary structures at high temperatures is well described by the molten phase picture and independent of the disorder . ] now , we will establish the stability of the molten phase against weak disorder by an analytical argument . we will use gaussian disorder characterized by eqs . ( [ eq_uncorrelated ] ) and ( [ eq_gaussiandisorder ] ) . as we have shown above , the different microscopic models of binding energies all yield the same scaling behaviors . with the uncorrelated gaussian energies , it is possible to perform the ensemble average of the partition function @xmath119 of @xmath4 rna molecules sharing the same disorder . the disorder - averaged free energy can then in principle be obtained via the `` replica - trick '' @xmath120 , by solving the @xmath4-replica problem @xcite . the @xmath4-replica partition function can be written down formally as @xmath121}\\ & = & \sum_{\{s_1\}}\ldots\sum_{\{s_n\ } } \prod_{k=1}^n\exp\left[-\beta\avereps|s_k|\right ] \exp\left[\frac{1}{2}\beta^2\sum_{k=1}^n\sum_{l=1}^n\sum_{(i , j)\in s_k } \sum_{(r , s)\in s_l } \overline{(\varepsilon_{i , j}-\avereps)(\varepsilon_{r , s}-\avereps ) } \right]\\ & = & \sum_{\{s_1\}}\ldots\sum_{\{s_n\}}\prod_{k=1}^n \exp\left[-\beta\avereps|s_k|\right ] \exp\left[\frac{1}{2}\beta^2d\sum_{k=1}^n\sum_{l=1}^n|s_k\cap s_l|\right]\\ & = & \sum_{\{s_1\}}\ldots\sum_{\{s_n\}}\prod_{k=1}^n q^{|s_k| } \prod_{1\le k < l\le n}\widetilde{q}^{|s_k\cap s_l| } \ ] ] where @xmath122 are the two relevant `` boltzmann factors '' . this effective partition function has a simple physical interpretation : it describes @xmath4 rna molecules subject to a _ homogeneous _ attraction with effective interaction energy @xmath123 between any two bases of the same molecule . as before , this effective attraction is characterized by the factor @xmath124 . in addition , there is an inter - replica attraction characterized by the factor @xmath125 for each bond _ shared _ between any pair of replicas . the inter - replica attraction is induced by the same sequence disorder shared by all replicas . for example , if the base composition in one piece of the strand matches particularly well with another piece , then there is a tendency to pair these pieces together in all replicas . thus , the inter - replica attraction can potentially force the different replicas to `` lock '' together , i.e. , to behave in an correlated way . indeed , the distribution of inter - replica correlations , usually measured in terms of `` overlaps '' , is a common device used to detect the existence of a glass phase in disordered systems @xcite . the full @xmath4-replica problem is difficult to solve analytically . we will examine this problem in the regime of small @xmath36 , aiming to resolve the relevancy of disorder in a perturbative sense . since the lowest order term of the fully random problem in a perturbation expansion in @xmath36 corresponds to the two - replica ( @xmath126 ) problem , we will focus on the latter in order to study the small-@xmath36 behavior of the full problem . the solution of the two - replica problem will also illustrate explicitly the type of interaction one is dealing with , thereby providing some intuition needed to tackle the full problem . it turns out that the two - replica problem can be solved exactly . here , we outline the saline features of the solution . details of the calculation and analysis are provided in the appendices . we will find that the two - replica system has a phase transition between the molten phase in which the two replicas are uncorrelated and a nontrivial phase in which the two replicas are completely locked together in the thermodynamic limit . the transition occurs at a finite temperature @xmath127 which approaches zero as @xmath128 . thus , the effect of weak disorder is _ irrelevant _ at finite temperatures . let us denote the two - replica partition function @xmath129 for two strands each of length @xmath7 by @xmath130 , where we keep the dependence on @xmath124 implicit . then , @xmath131 the key observation which allows us to solve the two - replica problem is that for each given pair of secondary structures , the bonds shared by two replicas ( hereafter referred to as `` common bonds '' ) form a valid secondary structure by themselves ( see fig . [ fig_combonds ] . ) thus , we can rearrange the summation over the pairs of secondary structures in the following way : we first sum over all possible secondary structures of the common bonds . for a _ given configuration _ of the common bonds , we then sum over the remaining possibilities of intra - replica base pairings for each replica , with the constraint that no new common bonds are created . note that the common bonds partition the diagram into a number of `` bubbles '' , shown as the shaded regions in fig . [ fig_combonds ] . due to the exclusion of pseudo - knots from the valid secondary structures , only bases belonging to the same bubble can be paired with each other . thus , the two - replica partition function can be written as @xmath132 where the factor @xmath133 is the weight of each common bond , and @xmath134 is the sum of all possible intra - replica pairings of of the @xmath5 bubble of @xmath135 bases in @xmath10 , with the restriction that there are no common bonds . it should be clear that @xmath136 neither depends on the number of stems branching out from the bubble @xmath43 nor the positions of these stems relative to the bases within the bubble . it depends on @xmath10 only through the number of bases @xmath135 in the bubble and is given by a single function @xmath137 independent of @xmath43 . this function can be written explicitly as @xmath138 with eqs . ( [ eq_gintermsofloops ] ) and ( [ eq_defq ] ) , the two - replica problem is reduced to an effective _ single _ homogeneous rna problem , with an effective boltzmann weight @xmath139 for each pairing , and an effective weight @xmath137 for each single stranded loop . as described in appendix [ app_intuitive ] , this problem becomes formally analogous to that of an rna in the vicinity of the denaturation transition , with @xmath137 being the weight of a single polymer loop fluctuating in @xmath0-dimensional embedding space . the competition between pairing energy and the bubble entropy leads to a _ phase transition _ for the two - replica problem , analogous to the denaturation transition for a single rna . the details of this transition are given in appendix [ app_solution ] , where the partition function ( [ eq_gintermsofloops ] ) is solved exactly . the exact solution exploits the relation @xmath140 which follows from the definitions ( [ eq_defg ] ) and ( [ eq_defq ] ) , and turns eq . ( [ eq_gintermsofloops ] ) into a recursive equation for @xmath141 . the solution is of the form @xmath142 for large @xmath7 , with two different forms for @xmath143 and @xmath144 depending on whether @xmath125 is above or below the critical value @xmath145 here @xmath74 is the molten phase partition function , whose large @xmath7 asymptotics is given by eq . ( [ eq_moltenz ] ) and whose values for small @xmath7 can be calculated explicitly from the recursion eq . ( [ eq_g0recursion ] ) . thus , the actual value of @xmath146 can be found for any given @xmath124 . for @xmath147 , we have @xmath148 and @xmath149 where @xmath150 according to eqs . ( [ eq_gatsingdef ] ) and ( [ eq_moltenzresult ] ) . in this regime , the two - replica partition function @xmath141 is essentially a product of two single - replica partition functions @xmath151 . compared to eq . ( [ eq_moltenz ] ) , we can identify @xmath143 as @xmath152 , and @xmath144 as a modified version of @xmath153 . since there is no coupling of the two replicas beyond a trivial shift in the free energy per length , @xmath154 , we conclude that the disorder coupling is irrelevant . hence the two - replica system is in the molten phase in this regime . for @xmath155 , we have @xmath156 and @xmath144 is given as the implicit solution of an equation involving only single - replica partition functions as shown in eqs . ( [ eq_zkdef ] ) and ( [ eq_zetaresult ] ) . here , the partition function of the two - replica system is found to have the _ same _ form as that of the single - replica system in ( [ eq_moltenz ] ) . this result implies that the two replicas are _ locked _ together via the disorder coupling , and the molten phase is no longer applicable in this regime . of course , as already explained above , only the weak - disorder limit ( i.e. , @xmath157 ) of the two - replica problem is of relevance to the full random rna problem . in this limit , @xmath158 while @xmath146 is found by evaluating eq . ( [ qc ] ) with @xmath159 . it can be easily verified that @xmath160 as long as @xmath124 is finite . thus in the weak disorder limit , we have @xmath147 , indicating that the molten phase is an appropriate description for the random rna . unfortunately , the two - replica calculation can not be used in itself to deduce whether the molten phase description breaks down at sufficiently strong disorder or low temperature . based on this analysis , we can not conclude whether the type of phase transition obtained for the two - replica problem is present in the full problem . having established the validity of the molten phase description of random rna molecules at weak disorder or high temperatures , we now turn our focus onto the low temperature regime . first , we will give an analytical argument for the existence of a glass phase at low temperatures . then , we will present extensive numerical studies confirming this result and characterizing this glass phase . we will start by showing that the molten phase can not persist for all temperatures down to @xmath161 . to this end , we will _ assume _ that long random rna is in the molten phase for _ all _ temperatures , i.e. , that the partition function for any substrand of large length @xmath162 is given by @xmath163\ ] ] with some effective temperature - dependent prefactor @xmath164 and free energy per length @xmath165 . then , we will show that this assumption leads to a contradiction below some temperature @xmath166 . this contradiction implies that the molten phase description breaks down at some finite @xmath167 . to be specific , we will consider the sequence disorder model ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) in this analysis . the quantity we will focus on is again the free energy @xmath168 of the largest possible pinch . under the assumption that the random sequences are described by the molten phase , it is given by @xmath169 for large @xmath7 and all @xmath170 _ independently _ of the values of the effective prefactor @xmath164 and the free energy per length @xmath165 ( see eq . ( [ eq_moltenpinch ] ) . ) on the other hand , we can study this pinching free energy for each given sequence of bases drawn from the ensemble of random sequences . for each such sequence , we can look for a continuous segment of @xmath171 watson - crick pairs @xmath32@xmath172@xmath173@xmath174 where the bases @xmath175 are within the first half of the molecule and the bases @xmath176 are in the second half ( see fig . [ fig_goodmatch](a ) . ) for random sequences , the probability of finding such exceptional segments decreases exponentially with the length @xmath101 , with the largest @xmath101 in a sequence of length @xmath7 being typically @xmath177 for exact complementary matches , the proportionality constant is known to be @xmath178 @xcite . and @xmath179 and the other of which is between positions @xmath180 and @xmath7 . such a piece of length @xmath181 can be found for almost all sequences . ( b ) shows how restricting configurations to those in which the good match forms watson - crick base pairs splits the molecule into two loops which can still form base pairs within the loops independently from each other . ] now , we calculate the pinching free energy @xmath182 by evaluating the two terms separately . the partition function for the unpinched sequence contains _ at least _ all the configurations in which the two complementary segments @xmath183 and @xmath176 are completely paired ( see fig . [ fig_goodmatch](b ) ) . thus , @xmath184 where @xmath185 is the free energy of the ensemble of structures in which the two complementary segments are paired . the latter is the sum of the free energy of the paired segments and those of the two remaining substrands @xmath186 of length @xmath187 and @xmath188 ( wrapping around the end of the molecule ) of length @xmath189 , i.e. , @xmath190.\ ] ] the free energy @xmath191 in the presence of the pinch is , by the assumption of the molten phase , the interaction energy of the pinched base pair @xmath192@xmath193 plus the molten free energy of the substrand @xmath194 and the molten free energy of the substrand @xmath195 , i.e. , according to eq . ( [ eq_moltenzeff ] ) @xmath196 up to terms independent of @xmath7 . combining this with eqs . ( [ eq_deltafasdifference ] ) , ( [ eq_unpinchedandpaired ] ) , and ( [ eq_fpaired ] ) , we get @xmath197 + \ell [ u_{\mathrm{m}}\!+\!2f_0(t)].\ ] ] using the result ( [ eq_lambda ] ) and that @xmath198 and @xmath199 are typically proportional to @xmath7 , we finally obtain @xmath200 \lambda^{-1 } \ln n\ ] ] for large @xmath7 . this is only consistent with eq . ( [ eq_assumedmoltenpinch ] ) if @xmath201.\ ] ] now , @xmath165 is a free energy and is hence a monotonically decreasing function of the temperature . thus the validity of the inequality ( [ eq_assumedmoltenpinch ] ) depends on the behavior of its right hand side at low temperatures . as @xmath202 , the inequality can only hold if @xmath203 . since the average total energy at @xmath204 is @xmath205 times the average total number of matched pairs of a random sequence , then @xmath206 is simply the fraction of matches and @xmath207 is the fraction of bases not matched ( for @xmath208 . ) clearly , @xmath207 can not be negative , and the inequality ( [ eq_assumedmoltenpinch ] ) must fail at some finite temperature unless @xmath209 . we can make a simple combinatorial argument to show that in most cases the fraction @xmath207 of unbound bases must strictly be positive . to illustrate this , let us generalize the `` alphabet size '' of the sequence disorder model of sec . [ sec_intenergies ] from @xmath210 to an arbitrary even integer @xmath211 . we will still adopt the energy rule ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) where each of the @xmath212 bases can form a `` watson - crick '' pair exclusively with one other base . let us estimate the number of possible sequences for which the fraction of unmatched bases @xmath207 is zero in the limit of long sequence length @xmath7 at @xmath204 . since at @xmath204 , only watson - crick ( w - c ) pairs can be formed , we only need to count the number of sequences for which the fraction of w - c paired bases is @xmath62 . this means that except for a sub - extensive number of bases , all have to be w - c paired to each other . from the mountain picture ( fig . [ fig_strreps ] ) , it is clear that the number of possible secondary structures for such sequences must scale like @xmath213 , since the fraction of horizontal steps is non - extensive so that at each step , there are only the possibilities for the mountain to go up or down . for each of the @xmath179 pairings in one of these @xmath213 structures , there are @xmath212 ways of choosing the bases to satisfy the pairing . so for each structure , there are @xmath214 ways of choosing the sequence that would guarantee the structure . since there are a total of @xmath215 sequences , it is clear that the fraction of sequences with all ( but a sub - extensive number of ) w - c pairs becomes negligible if @xmath216 thus , for @xmath217 , we must have @xmath218 . for @xmath219 , the left hand side of eq . ( [ eq_frustration ] ) grows faster than its right hand side . this reflects the absence of frustration in this simple two - letter model as already discussed at the end of sec . [ sec_intenergies ] . one way to retain frustration is to introduce additional constraints , e.g. , the minimal hairpin length used in ref . @xcite . with this constraint , a structure with a sub - extensive number of unmatched bases can only contain a sub - extensive number of hairpins . in the mountain picture , this means that except for a sub - extensive number of steps , there is only one choice to go up or down at every step . this changes eq . ( [ eq_frustration ] ) to @xmath220 . it ensures frustration since @xmath218 for _ all _ @xmath212 . since a minimal length of @xmath221 bases is necessary in the formation of a real hairpin , real rna is certainly frustrated by this argument . the random sequence model which we study in this paper is marginal since @xmath222 and there is no constraint on the minimal hairpin length . in this case , all the prefactors on the two sides of eq . ( [ eq_frustration ] ) ( e.g. , the overcounting of sequences that support more than one structure ) must be taken into account . we will not undertake this effort here , but will verify numerically in sec . [ sec_estimatets ] that @xmath218 also in this case . in all cases with @xmath218 , it follows that there is some unique temperature @xmath223 below which the consistency condition ( [ eq_consistencycondition ] ) breaks down , implying the inconsistency of the molten phase assumption in this regime . from this we conclude that there must be a phase transition away from the molten phase at some critical temperature @xmath224 . the precise value of the bound @xmath223 depends on @xmath225 which in turn depends on the stringency of the condition we impose on the rare matching segments . for instance , if we relax the condition of exact complementarity between two segments to allow for matches within each segment , then the constant @xmath225 will be reduced from @xmath226 and the value of @xmath223 will increase . this will be discussed more in sec . [ sec_estimatets ] . the above argument does not provide any guidance on the properties of the low temperature phase itself . in order to characterize the statistics of secondary structures formed at low temperatures , we re - do the simulations reported in sec . [ sec_hightnumerics ] at @xmath227 in energy units set by @xmath107 . at this temperature , an unbound base pair is penalized with a factor @xmath228 relative to a watson - crick base pair , and a non watson - crick base pair is penalized even more . thus , only the minimal energy structures contribute ( for the sequence lengths under consideration here ) , and we may regard this effectively as at @xmath204 . as in sec . [ sec_hightnumerics ] , we average over @xmath109 realizations of the disorder for @xmath110 , over @xmath111 realizations for @xmath112 and over @xmath113 realizations for @xmath229 . [ fig_lowtnum ] shows the results for the ladder size @xmath230 of the structures for the three models of disorders . the ladder size still scales algebraically with the length of the sequences , with numerically determined exponents ranging from @xmath231 to @xmath232 for the different choices of disorder . they are clearly different from the square root behavior ( dotted line ) expected of the molten phase . thus this result reaffirms our expectation that the secondary structures of a random rna sequence at zero temperature indeed belongs to a phase that is different from the molten phase . of secondary structures in the low temperature phase with the length @xmath7 of the sequences : the plot shows data for three different choices of disorder according to eqs . ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) , ( [ eq_uncorrelateddisorder ] ) , and ( [ eq_gaussiandisorder ] ) at @xmath233 . the average system size follows a power law . however , the best fit of the data for sequence disorder at @xmath234 to a power law indicated by the dashed line leads to an exponent of @xmath232 . the corresponding fits for energy and gaussian disorder yield exponents of @xmath232 and @xmath231 , respectively . this is distinctively different from the square root behavior of the molten phase indicated by the dotted line . the comparison of this plot with its counterpart in fig . [ fig_moltennumerics](a ) suggests that the behavior of rna secondary structures at low temperatures is different from the molten phase . ] a key question in characterizing the thermodynamic properties of disordered systems is whether the zero - temperature behavior persists for a range of finite temperatures . if it does , then the system is said to have a finite - temperature glass phase . one way to address this question is to study the overlap between different replicas of the rna molecule as mentioned earlier . if a non - trivial distribution of these overlaps with significant weight on large overlaps persists into finite temperatures , then the finite - temperature glass phase exists . this approach was taken by previous numerical studies @xcite . unfortunately , the results are inconclusive and even contradictory due to the weakness of the proposed phase transition only the fourth temperature derivative of the free energy seems to show an appreciable singularity . moreover , due to limitations in the sequence lengths probed , it was difficult to get a good estimate of the asymptotic behavior of the overlap distribution . in our study , we adopt a different approach based on the droplet theory of fisher and huse @xcite . in this approach , one studies the `` large scale low energy excitations '' about the ground state . this is usually accomplished by imposing a deformation over a length scale @xmath235 and monitoring the minimal ( free ) energy cost of the deformation . this cost is expected to scale as @xmath236 for large @xmath101 . a positive exponent @xmath237 indicates that the deformation cost _ grows _ with the size . if this is the case , the thermodynamics is dominated by a few low ( free ) energy configurations in the thermodynamic limit , and the statistics of the zero - temperature behavior persists into finite temperatures . on the other hand , if the exponent @xmath237 is negative , then there are a large number of configurations which have low overlap with the ground state but whose energies are similar to the ground state energy in the thermodynamic limit . at any finite temperature @xmath170 , a finite fraction of these configurations ( i.e. , those within @xmath86 of the ground state energy ) will contribute to the thermodynamics of the system . the zero temperature behavior is clearly not stable to thermal fluctuations in this case , and no thermodynamic glass phase can exist at any finite temperature . the analysis of the previous section indicate the existence of a glass phase ; thus we expect to find the excitation energy to _ increase _ with the deformation size . it should be noted that this criterion for glassiness is purely thermodynamical in nature and does not make any statement about _ kinetics_. a system which is not glassy thermodynamically can still exhibit very large _ barriers _ between the many practically degenerate low energy configurations , leading to a _ kinetic glass_. a study of the kinetics of rna , e.g. , in terms of barrier heights , is naturally dependent on the choice of allowed dynamical pathways to transform one rna secondary structure into another one @xcite . since the latter is a highly non - trivial problem , we will restrict ourselves to thermodynamics and use the droplet picture explained above as our criterion for the existence of a glass phase . according to the criterion for glassiness just presented , our goal is to determine the value of the exponent @xmath237 for random rnas numerically . to this end , the choice of `` large scale low energy excitations '' needs some careful thoughts . as in every disordered system , there is a very large number of structures which differ from the minimal energy structure only by a few base pairs and which have an energy only slightly higher than the minimum energy structure . these structures are clearly not of interest here . instead we need to find a controlled way of generating droplet excitations of various sizes . we propose to use the pinching method introduced in sec . [ sec_observables ] as a way to generate the deformation , and regard the difference between the minimal energy pinched structure and the ground state structure as the droplet excitation . there are several desirable features about these pinch - induced deformations : first , it gives a convenient way of controlling the size of the deformation . if @xmath238 is a base pair that is bound anyways in the ground state , pinching this base pair does not have any effect and @xmath239 . if we pinch base @xmath43 with some other base @xmath240 , then we force at least a partial deformation of the ground state , for bases in the vicinity of @xmath43 , @xmath241 , and @xmath44 . this is illustrated in fig . [ fig_pinchingstep ] with the deformed region indicated by the shade . as we move the pinch further away from the ground state pairing , we systematically probe the effect of larger and larger deformations ( provided that a pinch only induces _ local _ deformation as we will show ) . second , the minimal energy or the free energy of the secondary structures subject to the pinch constraint is easily calculable numerically by the dynamic programming algorithm as shown in eqs . ( [ eq_returnprobability ] ) and ( [ eq_pinchfreeenergy ] ) . third , the pinching of the bases in a sense mimics the actual dynamics of the rna molecule at low temperatures . in order for the molecule to transform from one secondary structure to another at a temperature where all matching bases should be paired , the bases have to make local rearrangements of the secondary structures much like the way depicted in fig . [ fig_pinchingstep ] @xcite . thus , the pinching energy provides the scale of variation in the local energy landscape for such rearrangements to the pinch free energies . ] . finally , `` pinching '' of a real rna molecule can be realized in the pulling of a long molecule through a pore @xcite . and @xmath241 ( open circles ) form a base pair in the indicated minimal energy structure ( a ) . thus , forcing these two bases to be bound by pinching does not affect the structure at all . pinching of @xmath8 on the other hand will lead to a local rearrangement ( shaded region ) of the structure as shown in ( b ) . the effect of such a pinch depends on the number of base pairs of the minimal energy structure the pinch is incompatible with . as indicated by the arrow in ( a ) , this number is given by the ladder distance @xmath242 between @xmath43 and @xmath44 ; in this example @xmath243 . ] a key question to the utility of these pinch deformations is whether the deformation is confined to the local region of the pinch as depicted in fig . [ fig_pinchingstep ] or whether it involves a global rearrangement of the structure . to test this aspect , we numerically study the changes in pinch free energy as a function of the `` size '' of a pinch . here , the definition of the pinch size needs some thought . consider a specific sequence whose minimal energy structure is @xmath244 . if the binding partner of base @xmath43 is base @xmath241 in the minimal energy structure , a natural measure for the size of a pinch @xmath245 with @xmath246 would be the ladder distance @xmath242 between base @xmath43 and base @xmath44 ; see fig . [ fig_pinchingstep ] . from the mountain representation ( fig . [ fig_strreps](b ) ) , it is easy to see that this is just the difference of the respective ladder distances of base @xmath44 and base @xmath43 from base @xmath62 as defined in eq . ( [ eq_defmountainheight ] ) , i.e. , @xmath247 . to find how the excitation energy depend on the pinch size , we just need to follow how the pinching free energy @xmath248 s depend statistically on the size @xmath242 s . to do so , we choose a large number of random sequences , and determine the minimal energy structure @xmath244 for each of these sequences . then , we compute the pinch free energies @xmath248 and the pinch size @xmath242 for _ all _ possible pinches @xmath8 for each sequence . afterwards , we average over all @xmath248 s with the same pinch size @xmath242 over all of the generated random sequences to obtain the function @xmath249 the results obtained at @xmath227 for a large range of sequence sizes from @xmath250 to @xmath115 are shown in fig . [ fig_fofh](a ) . we see that the data for different @xmath7 s fall on top of each other for small @xmath251 s , with @xmath252 this behavior explicitly shows that the pinch deformation is a _ local _ deformation . in particular , we see that for small @xmath251 s , the free energy cost is _ independent _ of the overall length @xmath7 of the molecule . of minimal energy structure base pairs that are incompatible with the pinch for random sequence disorder at @xmath233 : ( a ) shows the raw data . for small @xmath253 the pinching free is independent of the length @xmath7 of the molecule and obeys a power law @xmath254 ( dashed line . ) this is consistent with the expectation that pinching at small @xmath251 leads to _ local _ rearrangements of the secondary structure . the apparent non - monotonic behavior at large @xmath251 is due to the small number of sequences in which such a value of @xmath251 is realized . ( b ) shows the same data , but the scaling of @xmath253 with @xmath7 is chosen in accordance with fig . [ fig_lowtnum ] while the scaling of the pinching free energy is chosen in accordance with the power law dependence estimated above . ] it is interesting to see at which @xmath251 the entire sequence is involved . one expects @xmath255 since @xmath230 gives the typical scale of the maximum ladder length . to test this , we normalized @xmath251 by @xmath256 and @xmath257 by @xmath258 ( such that the relation ( [ eq_fh ] ) is preserved for small @xmath251 s ) . the result is shown in fig . [ fig_fofh](b ) . we see that the data is approximately collapsed onto a single curve , indicating that pinching is indeed a good way of imposing a controlled deformation from the ground state . the scaling plot of fig . [ fig_fofh](b ) indicates strongly that the energy associated with the pinch deformation _ increases _ with the size of the deformation , i.e. , @xmath259 . however , the effective exponent involved is small , making the result very susceptible to finite size effects . in order to decide on the glassiness of the system , we want to focus on the energy scales associated with the largest pinch deformations from the ground state . assuming that there is only a single energy scale associated with large pinches , we again study the free energy @xmath103 of the largest pinch as defined in eq . ( [ eq_largestpinchfreeenergy ] ) and average this over the ensemble of sequences . this quantity yields an _ upper bound _ estimate of the energy associated with large scale pinches for each sequence length @xmath7 . we find @xmath260 and @xmath261 to have the same scaling behavior , and thus present only data for the latter . ] . the results are shown in fig . [ fig_pinch](a ) for the three models of disorders . although a weak power law dependence of @xmath261 on @xmath7 can not be excluded , the fitted exponents obtained for the three models are different from each other , ranging from @xmath262 to @xmath263 . this is a strong sign of concern , since the exponents are expected to be independent of details of the models . in fig . [ fig_pinch](b ) , the same data is plotted on a log - linear scale . the data fall reasonably on a straight line for each of the models ( especially for large @xmath7 s ) , suggesting that the pinching free energy may actually increase _ logarithmically _ with the sequence length , similar to what is expected of the behavior in the molten phase ! however in this case , the prefactor of the logarithm depends on the choice of the model and is much larger than the factor @xmath264 expected of the molten phase ; see eq . ( [ eq_moltenpinch ] ) . for example , for the numerical data obtained at @xmath227 , the prefactor is approximately @xmath265 for the sequence disorder model , while the expected slope for the molten phase is @xmath266 at this temperature . having different logarithmic prefactors for the different models is not a concern , since a prefactor is a non universal quantity . thus , our numerical results favor a logarithmically increasing pinch energy , with a prefactor much exceeding @xmath267 at low temperature . . the exponents are @xmath268 , @xmath269 , and @xmath258 for the sequence , energy , and gaussian disorder respectively . ( a ) shows the same data in a single logarithmic plot together with the best fits to a logarithmic dependence on @xmath7 . the statistical error of the data points is about the size of the symbols for large @xmath7 and smaller than that for @xmath270 . due to the apparent systematic bending of the data in the double logarithmic plot ( b ) we conclude that a logarithmic dependence fits the data better although we can not exclude a power law behavior with a very small power . ] what does this tell us about the possible glass phase of the random rna ? in order to answer this question , we should remind ourselves that rather special deformations are chosen in this study . for our choice of pinch deformations , we observe a logarithmic dependence of the gap between the ground state energy and the energy of the excited configurations on the length of the sequence or deformation . this corresponds to the marginal case of the droplet theory where the exponent @xmath237 vanishes . since the pinching free energies are increasing with length , we can not exclude a glass phase in the case @xmath271 . we can say , though , that the increase of the excitation energy with length is at most a power law with a very small exponent and most probably even less than any power law . therefore , a possible glass phase of rna has to be _ very weak_. if it turns out that the excitation energy is indeed a logarithmic function of length , with a non - vanishing prefactor as @xmath202 as our numerics suggest , then the low - temperature phase would be categorized formally as a _ marginal _ glass phase , analogous to behaviors found in some well - studied model of statistical mechanics @xcite . in any case , we should note that the actual difference in the excitation energy is only a factor of @xmath210 across two - and - a - half decades in length . thus the glassy effect will be weak for practical purposes . on the other hand , the weak dependence of the excitation energy on length may be the underlying cause of discrepancies in the literature @xcite regarding the existence of the glass phase for the random rna . now that we have studied in great detail the behavior of random rna in the low and the high temperature phase , we describe its behavior at intermediate temperatures . to this end , we again study the pinch free energies @xmath261 defined in eq . ( [ eq_largestpinchfreeenergy ] ) , but this time over a large range of temperatures . we concentrate on the sequence disorder model eq . ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) with @xmath107 , and study sequences of lengths up to @xmath114 . from secs . [ sec_scaling ] , [ sec_hightnumerics ] , and [ sec_weakness ] , we know that the pinch free energy @xmath261 depends logarithmically on the sequence length @xmath7 at both low and high temperatures . indeed , this logarithmic behavior seems to hold for _ all _ temperatures studied . the data for each temperature can easily be fitted to the form @xmath272 the prefactor @xmath273 is found to depend on temperature in a non - monotonic way as shown in fig . [ fig_logfactors ] . the figure contains values of @xmath273 extracted by fitting the data for @xmath234 to the form eq . ( [ eq_logform ] ) . the uncertainty of this fit is on the order of the size of the symbols or smaller . for high temperatures , we find @xmath274 ( dashed line in fig . [ fig_logfactors ] ) as expected for the molten phase . at low temperatures , it starts from a finite value of the order @xmath62 and decreases linearly with temperature , as @xmath275 ( dotted line in fig . [ fig_logfactors ] ) . if we identify the glass transition temperature @xmath276 as the intersection of the dashed and the dotted lines , we get @xmath277 of the logarithmic dependence of @xmath278 on @xmath7 for random rna sequences generated by the sequence disorder model : at high temperatures , the prefactor indicated by the circle is well - described by the dashed line @xmath279 expected of the molten phase . at low temperatures , it again has a linear temperature dependence and is empirically fitted by the dotted line , @xmath280 . the numerical uncertainty in @xmath273 is of the order of or smaller than the size of the symbols . ] it is interesting to compare this estimate with the lower bound @xmath223 for the glass transition temperature given in sec . [ sec_proofglass ] . according to the consistency condition ( [ eq_consistencycondition ] ) , this lower bound is defined by @xmath281=\frac{3}{2}k_b t^*\ ] ] with @xmath282 . it is necessary to determine the temperature dependence of the quantity @xmath283 on the left hand side of this equation numerically . to do this , we measure the total free energy of each sequence generated . averaging these free energies over all the sequences of a given length @xmath7 and temperature @xmath170 , and dividing the results by the respective lengths @xmath7 , we obtain an estimate @xmath284 of the free energy per length which approaches the desired @xmath165 for large @xmath7 . : the data shown is taken at @xmath227 . for small @xmath7 it is dominated by the statistical fluctuations in the number of bases according to eq . ( [ eq_smallnf0 ] ) ( the dashed line ) . at large @xmath7 , it saturates to a positive constant . ] [ fig_ump2f0ofn ] shows how these estimates depend on the sequence length @xmath7 for the lowest temperature @xmath227 studied . instead of the free energy per length itself , the figure shows the fraction of unbound bases @xmath285 . for short sequences these estimates show a clear dependence on the sequence length @xmath7 this can be understood in terms of sequence - to - sequence fluctuations in the maximum number of possible pairings , due to fluctuations in the actual number of each type of bases present in a given sequence , even if all four bases are drawn with equal probability . this effect can be quantified by assuming that there is no frustration for small @xmath7 , i.e. , for any given sequence of the four bases @xmath286 , @xmath287 , @xmath151 , and @xmath288 , a secondary structure with the maximal number of watson - crick base pairs can be formed . if we denote by @xmath289 the number of times that the base @xmath290 appears in the sequence , the maximal number @xmath291 of pairings is given by @xmath292 . the fraction of unbound bases @xmath293 due to this effect can be computed straightforwardly approximating the multinomial distribution of @xmath294 by an appropriate gaussian distribution , with the result @xmath295 we expect this effect to be responsible for the increase in @xmath296 found in fig . [ fig_ump2f0ofn ] . indeed this effect , as indicated by the dashed line in the figure , explains the @xmath7 dependence of @xmath296 well for @xmath297 . however , we also see from the figure a clear saturation effect at large @xmath7 . this saturation reflects the finite fraction of unbound bases which is a frustration effect forced upon the system through the restriction on the type of allowed pairings in a allowed secondary structure . the unbound fraction @xmath298 is _ finite _ asymptotically as expected in sec . [ sec_proofglass ] . note that this value is _ remarkably small _ , as it implies that in the ground state structure of our toy random sequence , more than @xmath299 of the maximally possible base pairs are formed . but this is an artifact of the very simple energy rule used in our toy model . this fraction certainly will become smaller if the realistic energy rules are used , making the system more frustrated hence more glassy . in order to obtain the temperature dependence of the quantity @xmath283 on the left hand side of eq . ( [ eq_defoftstar ] ) , we will use its value at @xmath114 as an estimate of its asymptotic value . the results are shown in fig . [ fig_ump2f0 ] . the behavior at low temperatures can be described by a linearly decreasing function , shown as the dotted line in fig . [ fig_ump2f0 ] . according to eq . ( [ eq_defoftstar ] ) , the temperature @xmath223 is obtained as the intersection of this curve and @xmath300 , shown as the dashed line in fig . [ fig_ump2f0 ] for @xmath178 . we find @xmath301 which is consistent with the estimate ( [ eq_tgestimate ] ) , but is a rather weak bound . improved bounds on @xmath106 can be made by relaxing the condition of perfect complementarity of the two segments imposed in sec . [ sec_proofglass ] . this leads to larger values of the prefactor @xmath302 in eq . ( [ eq_defoftstar ] ) , hence a smaller slope for the dashed line in fig . [ fig_ump2f0 ] , and a larger value of @xmath223 . while the details of improved bounds will be discussed elsewhere , let us remark here that from fig . [ fig_ump2f0 ] it is clear that no matter what the slope of the dashed line becomes , we will never have @xmath223 larger than the temperature of @xmath303 where the quantity @xmath283 goes below zero . thus , these estimates will always be consistent with the observed glass transition temperature of @xmath304 . moreover , we note that the low temperature behavior @xmath305 as indicated by the dotted line in fig . [ fig_ump2f0 ] , appears to be roughly related to the behavior of @xmath273 ( dotted line in fig . [ fig_logfactors ] ) in the same temperature range , by a single scaling factor of approximately @xmath306 . thus , it is possible that @xmath307\ ] ] if it turns out that @xmath308 for @xmath309 . if this is the case , then it means the procedure we used to estimate the pinch energy in sec . [ sec_proofglass ] is quantitatively correct , implying that the ground state of a random rna sequence indeed consists of the matching of rare segments independently at each length scale . it will be useful to pursue this analysis further using a renormalization group approach similar to what was developed for the denaturation of heterogeneous dnas by tang and chat @xcite . : the symbols show numerical estimates of the quantity @xmath283 for different temperatures . the estimates are obtained by averaging the numerically determined free energy of @xmath113 random sequences of length @xmath114 generated by the sequence disorder model eq . ( [ eq_energychoice ] ) with @xmath107 . the low temperature behavior can be described reasonably well by the expression @xmath310 ( dotted line ) . the consistency condition ( [ eq_consistencycondition ] ) for the molten phase breaks down when this line intersects @xmath311 ( the dashed line ) . this yields @xmath312 as a lower bound for the glass transition temperature of this system . ] in this manuscript , we studied the statistical properties of random rna sequences far below the denaturation transition so that bases predominantly form base pairs . we introduced several toy energy models which allowed us to perform detailed analytical and numerical studies . through a two - replica calculation , we show that sequence disorder is perturbatively irrelevant , i.e. , an rna molecule with weak sequence disorder is in a molten phase where many secondary structures with comparable total energy coexist . a numerical study of the model at high temperature recovers scaling behaviors characteristic of the molten phase . at very low temperatures , a scaling argument based on the extremal statistics of rare matches suggest the existence of a different phase . this is supported by extensive numerical results : forced deformations are introduced by pinching distant monomers along the backbone ; the resulting excitation energies are found to grow very slowly ( i.e. , logarithmically ) with the deformation size . it is likely that the low temperature phase is a marginal glass phase . the intermediate temperature range is also studied numerically . the transition between the low temperature glass phase and the high temperature molten phase is revealed by a change in the coefficient of the logarithmic excitation energy , from being disorder dominated to entropy dominated . from a theoretical perspective , it would be desirable to find an analytical characterization of the low temperature phase . if the excitation energy indeed diverges only logarithmically , one has the hope that this may be possible , e.g. , via the replica theory , as was done for another well known model of statistical physics @xcite . it should also be interesting to include the spatial degrees of freedom of the polymer backbone ( via the logarithmic loop energy ) , to see how sequence disorder affects the denaturation transition . another direction is to include sequence _ design _ which biases a specific secondary structure , e.g. , a stem - loop @xcite . from a numerical point of view , it is necessary to perform simulations with realistic energy parameters to assess the relevant temperature regimes and length scales where the glassy effect takes hold . to make potential contact with biology , one needs to find out whether a molten phase indeed exists between the high temperature denatured phase and the low temperature glass phase for a real random rna molecule , and which phase the molecule is in under normal physiological condition . finally , it will be very important to perform _ kinetic _ studies to explore the dynamical aspects of the glass phase . despite the apparent weakness of the thermodynamic glassiness , the kinetics at biologically relevant temperatures is expected to be very slow for random sequences @xcite . the authors benefitted from helpful discussions with u. gerland and d. moroz . t.h . acknowledges an earlier collaboration with d. cule which initiated this study , and is indebted to l .- h . tang for a stimulating discussion during which the simple picture of sec . [ sec_proofglass ] emerged . this work is supported by the national science foundation through grants no . dmr-9971456 and dbi-9970199 . the authors are grateful to the hospitality of the institute for theoretical physics at uc santa barbara where this work was completed . before we describe the exact solution for the two - replica problem , as defined by the partition function @xmath141 in eq . ( [ eq_gintermsofloops ] ) and the bubble weight @xmath137 in eq . ( [ eq_defq ] ) , we first provide here a heuristic derivation of the qualitative results . this mainly serves to give a flavor of the two - replica problem in the language of theoretical physics . to this end , we define the quantity @xmath313 to be the partition function over all two replica configurations of a sequence of length @xmath314 under the constraint that base @xmath62 and base @xmath314 form a common bond . it is easy to see that @xmath315 where we set @xmath316 thus , the critical behavior of @xmath317 is identical to the critical behavior of @xmath313 which we will study in the following . due to the no pseudo knot constraint of the secondary structures , @xmath313 has a very simple structure , @xmath318 as illustrated in fig . [ fig_pirecurs ] . : while the first and last of the @xmath7 bases described by @xmath319 always form a base pair this outermost base pair can be followed by a loop with @xmath320 outgoing stems . each of the stems is described by @xmath321 itself while the loop is characterized by its total length that can be split into the different pieces @xmath135 in different ways . ] to simplify the above equation , it is useful to introduce the @xmath77-transforms @xmath322&=&\sum_{n=1}^\infty \pi(n ) e^{-\mu n}\\ \qhat[y]&=&\sum_{n=1}^\infty \tworq(n ) e^{-yn}\end{aligned}\ ] ] of @xmath321 and @xmath137 . now applying the @xmath77-transform to both sides of eq . ( [ eq_pi.1 ] ) , we obtain @xmath322e^{2\mu}\!\!\!&=&\!\!\ ! ! \int\!\ ! \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{2\pi i } \qhat[y ] \khat[y,\mu ] \big [ 1\ ! + \ ! \khat[y,\mu]\pihat[\mu]e^{2\mu}e^{-y } \label{eq_pi.2}\\\nonumber & & \hspace*{25 mm } + \ ! \left(\khat[y,\mu]\pihat[\mu]e^{2\mu}e^{-y}\right)^2 \!\!\!\!+\ldots \big]\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath323 = \frac{1}{e^{-y+\mu}-1},\ ] ] and the inverse transform @xmath324 e^{y\ell}$ ] was used . ( [ eq_pi.2 ] ) can be simplified greatly to the following form , @xmath325e^{2\mu } = \qhat\cdot \int\frac{\mathrm{d}y}{2\pi i } \frac{\qhat[y]}{\khat^{-1}[y,\mu]-\pihat[\mu]e^{2\mu}e^{-y}}. \label{eq_pi}\ ] ] this is reminiscent of the well - known hartree solution to the @xmath326-theory , or equivalently the self - consistent treatment of the self - interacting polymer problem @xcite , if we identify @xmath327 as the interaction parameter , @xmath328 $ ] as the propagator " . the usual form of the hartree equation @xmath325 = \qhat\cdot \int \frac{\mathrm{d}^dk}{(2\pi)^d } \ , \frac{1}{k^2 + \mu -\pihat[\mu ] } \label{eq_pi1}\ ] ] corresponds to the small-@xmath329 , small-@xmath330 limit of eq . ( [ eq_pi ] ) , with @xmath331 playing the role of the square of the wave number " @xmath332 . note that @xmath333 $ ] plays the role of the density of ( spatial ) states , i.e. @xmath334 = \frac{\mathrm{d}^dk}{(2\pi)^d}$ ] , where @xmath335 denotes the _ dimensionality _ of the embedding space " . in the context of rna , de gennes used this approach to describe the denaturation of uniformly attracting rna more than 30 years ago @xcite . recently , this approach has been extended by moroz and hwa to study the phase diagram of rna structure formation @xcite . the analysis of a self - consistent equation of the type ( [ eq_pi ] ) is well known @xcite . the analytical properties of @xmath336 $ ] depend crucially on the form of @xmath333 $ ] . let the singular part of @xmath337 be @xmath338 where @xmath339 is the position of the singularity of @xmath333 $ ] . [ note that @xmath340 by comparing the forms of the hartree equations ( [ eq_pi ] ) and ( [ eq_pi1 ] ) . ] for @xmath341 , there is only one solution for all @xmath342 , with a square root singularity in @xmath336 $ ] at some finite value of @xmath330 . for @xmath343 , there are two possible solutions depending on the value of @xmath327 . the square - root singularity exists for @xmath327 exceeding some critical value depends through @xmath337 on @xmath124 but not on @xmath125 . ] @xmath344 , while for @xmath345 , the square - root singularity disappears and @xmath336 $ ] is governed by the singularity of @xmath337 given in eq . ( [ eq_qsing ] ) . performing the inverse transform and using eq . ( [ eq_gandpi ] ) , we get @xmath346 where @xmath144 is a non - universal parameter given by the location of the singularity , while the exponent @xmath347 characterizes the phase of the system and is given by the singularity of @xmath336 $ ] : we have @xmath348 if @xmath336 $ ] is dominated by the square - root singularity and @xmath349 if @xmath336 $ ] is dominated by @xmath337 . the interpretation of the two phases with @xmath348 and @xmath349 are straightforward : the phase with @xmath350 describes the usual rna secondary structure ( see eq . ( [ eq_moltenz ] ) ) ; here the bubbles described by @xmath137 are irrelevant . in the other phase , the result that @xmath349 indicates that base pairing is not relevant and the system behaves as a single bubble . in the context of the original two - replica problem , the irrelevancy of the bubbles in the @xmath350 phase indicates that the two replicas are locked together , behaving as a single replica in this phase . in the other phase , the attraction of the common bonds is irrelevant , and the two replicas become independent of each other . as explained in sec . [ sec_replica ] , the purpose of the two - replica calculation is to determine whether the inter - replica attraction , characterized by @xmath327 here , is irrelevant , i.e. , whether the system will not yet be in the @xmath350 phase for a value of @xmath351 . this is only possible if @xmath352 . from the solution of the problem described above , this depends crucially on the singularity of @xmath337 , specifically , on whether @xmath353 . the difficulty in ascertaining the form of @xmath337 lies in the no - common - bond constraint ( i.e. , @xmath354 ) in the definition of @xmath137 ( [ eq_defq ] ) . however , we note that for @xmath355 , the two replica partition function @xmath356 is simply the square of the single replica partition function @xmath74 . thus , @xmath357 according to eq . ( [ eq_moltenz ] ) . since we just convinced ourselves that @xmath347 can take on only two possible values , namely @xmath358 and @xmath359 and since @xmath360 we conclude @xmath361 and moreover @xmath362 . thus , we do expect the phase transition to occur at @xmath363 . however , it is not clear from this calculation if the system at @xmath355 ( or @xmath364 ) is exactly at or strictly below the phase transition point . we leave it to the exact solution of the two replica problem presented in the next two appendices to establish that @xmath364 is indeed strictly below the phase transition point and that therefore disorder is perturbatively irrelevant . we note that in the context of the @xmath326-theory or the self - consistent treatment of the self - interacting polymer , the result @xmath365 implies that the embedding spatial dimension is @xmath366 . thus , the two - replica problem corresponds to the denaturation of a single rna in @xmath0 spatial dimensions . the bubbles @xmath137 s of fig . ( [ fig_combonds ] ) which originate from the branching entropy of the individual rnas play the role of spatial configurational entropy of the single - stranded rna in the denaturation problem . in this appendix , we present the exact solution of the two replica problem . while most of the details are given here , the most laborious part is further relegated to app . [ app_derivez1 ] . we start by introducing an auxiliary quantity @xmath367 . this is a restricted two - replica partition function , summing over all independent secondary structures of a pair of rnas of length @xmath314 bases in which there are exactly @xmath368 exterior bases of the common bond structure without disrespecting the no pseudo - knot constraint . ] all of which are completely unbound in both replicas . since the exterior bases form one of the bubbles of the common bond structure , the possible binding configurations of these exterior bases are described by @xmath369 . thus , the full partition function of the two replica problem can be calculated from this restricted partition function as @xmath370 now , let us formulate a recursion relation for @xmath371 by adding one additional base @xmath7 to each of the two rnas . we can separate the possible configurations of the new function @xmath372 according to the possibilities that the new base @xmath7 is either not involved in a common bond or forms a common bond with base @xmath373 . this yields the recursion relation @xmath374 for @xmath375 and @xmath376 . the applicable boundary conditions are : @xmath377 , @xmath378 , and @xmath379 for each @xmath380 and @xmath381 . at this point , it is convenient to introduce the @xmath77-transforms in order to decouple the discrete convolution in eq . ( [ eq_trrecurs ] ) . they are @xmath382 using eq . ( [ eq_trrecurs ] ) and the boundary conditions we get @xmath383 this can be solved for @xmath384 with the result @xmath385 together with the boundary condition @xmath386 , we get @xmath387^{-n}.\ ] ] if we now multiply eq . ( [ eq_gbywandq ] ) by @xmath388 and sum both sides over @xmath7 we get @xmath389 which , upon inserting eq . ( [ eq_hatw ] ) , becomes an implicit equation @xmath390 for the full partition function @xmath391 , provided that we know the function @xmath392 . since @xmath392 does not depend on @xmath125 , we can find its form using the following strategy : if @xmath355 , a common bond does not contribute any additional boltzmann factor . thus , the two replica partition function for this specific value of @xmath125 is just the square of the partition function of a single uniformly attracting rna molecule , i.e. , @xmath393 since we know @xmath74 through the exact expression ( [ eq_singlez ] ) for its @xmath77-transform @xmath394 , we can regard @xmath395 as a known function , even though a closed form expression is not available . from eq . ( [ eq_trimplicit ] ) , we have @xmath396 this is an equation for @xmath392 in terms of the known function @xmath395 . after we solve it for @xmath392 below , we can use eq . ( [ eq_trimplicit ] ) to solve for the only leftover unknown @xmath391 for arbitrary values of @xmath125 . in the thermodynamic limit , it is sufficient to consider only the singularities of the @xmath77-transform @xmath391 . from the form of @xmath397 in the vicinity of the singularity @xmath398 , the two - replica partition function @xmath317 is readily obtained by the inverse @xmath77-transform , with the result @xmath399 the result immediately yields the free energy per length , @xmath400 . more significantly , the exponent @xmath143 reveals which phase the two - replica system is in : for @xmath355 ( i.e. no disorder ) , the two - replica system is just a product of two independent single - replica systems and we must have @xmath148 as implied by the single - replica partition function @xmath74 in eq . ( [ eq_moltenz ] ) . on the other hand , for @xmath401 , the two replicas are forced to be locked together and behave as a single replica . in this case , we must have @xmath402 . as we will see , @xmath148 and @xmath403 are the only values this exponent can take on for this system ; it indicates whether or not the two replicas are locked , and hence whether or not the effect of disorder is relevant . the singularity @xmath398 of @xmath391 is given implicitly by eq . ( [ eq_trimplicit ] ) , which we now analyze in detail . we start by recalling the solution of the homogeneous single rna problem , eq . ( [ eq_moltenz ] ) . from the relation ( [ eq_g2 ] ) , we have @xmath404 for large @xmath7 , with @xmath82 , @xmath405 , and @xmath406 given in sec . [ sec_moltenpartfunc ] . hence , the @xmath77-transform @xmath407 is defined on the interval @xmath408 . it is a monotonously decreasing function of @xmath77 , terminating with a singularity at @xmath409 which produces the @xmath148 singularity in @xmath356 . due to ( [ eq_trimplicitqt1 ] ) , the same singularity must occur in @xmath410 at @xmath411 , where @xmath412 is a positive number and does not depend on anything else but @xmath124 . since @xmath413 is a smooth monotonously increasing function which maps the interval @xmath408 into the interval @xmath414 , it follows from eq . ( [ eq_trimplicitqt1 ] ) that @xmath410 is a smooth , monotonously decreasing function which maps the interval @xmath414 into the interval @xmath4150,\gatsing]$ ] . now that we have characterized @xmath410 in detail , we can proceed to study @xmath391 for arbitrary @xmath125 . clearly , according to eq . ( [ eq_trimplicit ] ) @xmath391 has a singularity leading to @xmath148 at @xmath416 , defined implicitly by @xmath417 because @xmath410 has this singularity at @xmath418 . again according to eq . ( [ eq_trimplicit ] ) , we have @xmath419 independent of @xmath125 . this leads to one of the key results @xmath420 if @xmath416 is the only singularity of @xmath391 , it would imply that there is only one phase with @xmath148 , and the free energy per length of the two - replica system is given by @xmath421\ ] ] for all values of @xmath125 . by differentiating this with respect to @xmath125 , we obtain the fraction of common contacts @xmath422 in this phase as a function of @xmath125 . for very large disorder , i.e. , for large @xmath125 , this fraction converges to one . however , since it is the fraction of bonds divided by the total number of bases and every base pair has two bases , it has to be bounded from above by @xmath423 . thus , we conclude that eq . ( [ eq_freeenergy0 ] ) can not be the free energy of the two - replica system for all @xmath125 s . at least for large @xmath125 , there must be another singularity of @xmath391 which will yield a different expression for the free energy to give physically reasonable fraction of common bonds . in order to find this other singularity , we introduce the inverse function @xmath424 of @xmath391 . from eq . ( [ eq_trimplicit ] ) , it follows that for any @xmath125 and any @xmath4250,\gatsing]$ ] , @xmath426\\ \rightarrow\quad g&= & \widehat{\tworq}[\widehat{\tworz}(g;\widetilde{q})-q^2\widetilde{q } g]\\ \rightarrow\quad \widehat{\tworq}^{-1}(g)&= & \widehat{\tworz}(g;\widetilde{q})-q^2\widetilde{q } g.\end{aligned}\ ] ] since @xmath427 does not depend on @xmath125 , we can eliminate it by evaluating the last equation above at the special value @xmath355 and write @xmath428 where @xmath429 is the inverse of the known function @xmath395 . ( [ eq_zrelation ] ) is now an explicit solution for the inverse of @xmath391 for _ arbitrary _ @xmath125 , and the singularity of @xmath430 , located at @xmath431 and @xmath432 , yields the free energy of the two - replica system , i.e. , @xmath433 , in this phase . while app . [ app_derivez1 ] derives the position of the dominant singularity present in eq . ( [ eq_zrelation ] ) rigorously , we will resort to some intuitive argument here . since @xmath434 is a monotonously decreasing , convex function , so is its inverse @xmath429 . the latter function ends at the point @xmath435 with some slope @xmath436 in a singularity which produces the @xmath148 behavior indicative of two independently fluctuating uniformly self - attracting replicas . this is shown in fig . [ fig_zhatsketch ] as the solid line . according to eq . ( [ eq_zrelation ] ) , we can obtain the corresponding function @xmath424 for arbitrary @xmath125 by simply adding a linear function @xmath437 to this function . if the slope @xmath438 of this linear function is less than the smallest slope of @xmath429 , i.e. , if @xmath439 , adding this linear function does not qualitatively change anything ( see the short dashed line in fig . [ fig_zhatsketch ] . ) the only singularity is still the one at @xmath440 , the corresponding value in @xmath77 , i.e. , @xmath441 , is trivially shifted by an amount @xmath442 from @xmath443 as @xmath125 varies . thus , the scaling behavior is characterized by @xmath148 as if @xmath355 ( i.e. , absence of disorders ) , although the free energy @xmath444 is shifted as already derived in eq . ( [ eq_freeenergy0 ] ) . of the two replica system at various values of the common bond interaction @xmath125 : the solid line shows the free system without any interaction of common bonds . in the presence of an interaction , the inverse function of the partition function can be obtained by adding a linear function to the free system function . if the interaction is not too strong ( @xmath445 , short dashed line ) adding the linear function with a small slope does not change the qualitative form of the partition function . in this case , the two replica system is controlled by the singularity at @xmath440 which is independent of @xmath125 . at stronger interactions ( @xmath446 , long dashed line ) the inverse function develops a minimum . beyond this minimum it is not invertible any more and the two replica system is then dominated by the singularity arising from this minimum . ] if the final slope @xmath447 of the right hand side of eq . ( [ eq_zrelation ] ) is _ positive _ the situation becomes much different : upon adding the linear function , @xmath424 develops a minimum at some position @xmath448 . thus , the inverse function @xmath391 has to be calculated from the left ( small @xmath449 ) branch of @xmath424 and has a _ square root singularity _ at @xmath450 . this square root singularity implies that the characteristic exponent becomes @xmath403 , consistent with the picture that in this phase the two replicas are locked together and fluctuate as one single effective rna molecule . the position @xmath451 of the minimum is determined by the root of the derivative , i.e. , by @xmath452^{-1}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!.\ ] ] the corresponding value @xmath453 determines the location of the square root singularity @xmath450 of @xmath391 , i.e. , the free energy per length of the two replica problem . @xmath450 can be conveniently expressed in terms of the auxiliary quantity @xmath454 defined through @xmath455 as @xmath456 comparing this expression with eq . ( [ eq_freeenergy0 ] ) which is valid for small @xmath125 , we can summarize the complete solution in terms of @xmath457\singlezsing^2,\infty[$ that ful-}\ & \widetilde{q}>\widetilde{q}_{\mathrm{c}}\\ \mbox{fils } \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}z}\widehat{\tworg}(z;1 ) \!=\!\!-\!1\!/[q^2(\widetilde{q}\!-\!1)]&\\[10pt ] \singlezsing^2=(1 + 2\sqrt{q})^2&\widetilde{q}\le\widetilde{q}_{\mathrm{c } } \end{array}\right.\ ] ] where @xmath458 and @xmath459 in terms of this @xmath460 , the smallest singularity of @xmath461 is located at @xmath462 the free energy per length of the two replica system is given by @xmath463\ ] ] and the fraction of common bonds is @xmath464 this fraction of common bonds turns out to be continuous at the phase transition but it exhibits a jump in its slope at @xmath465 . in the case @xmath466 , these simplify to eqs . ( [ eq_freeenergy0 ] ) and ( [ eq_contacts0 ] ) ( or eqs . ( [ eq_moltenzinmaintext ] ) and ( [ eq_defginmaintext ] ) respectively ) , with @xmath467 independent of @xmath125 . the type of singularity of the laplace transformed partition function is the same as at @xmath355 , resulting in @xmath148 . for @xmath446 , we can not write down a closed form expression for @xmath398 any more . but it is given implicitly in terms of the solution of eq . ( [ eq_zkdef ] ) ; it involves only single replica quantities and can thus be evaluated numerically . moreover , we have seen that the dominant singularity is in this regime a square root singularity implying @xmath403 . in this appendix we give a derivation of the position of the non - trivial singularity in the laplace transform of the partition function @xmath391 . a more intuitive , graphical derivation of this result was given in app . [ app_solution ] . using eq . ( [ eq_zrelation ] ) , we start by calculating @xmath468^{-1}\\ & = & \left[\left.\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}g } \right|_{g=\widehat{\tworg}(z;\widetilde{q})}\!\!\!\ ! \widehat{\tworz}(g;1)+q^2(\widetilde{q}-1 ) \right]^{-1}\\ & = & \left[\left[\left.\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}z } \right|_{z=\widehat{\tworz}(\widehat{\tworg}(z;\widetilde{q});1)}\!\!\!\!\widehat{\tworg}(z;1 ) \right]^{-1}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!+q^2(\widetilde{q}-1)\right]^{-1}\!\!\!\!.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this expression obviously has a singularity at @xmath450 which is defined by @xmath469 since @xmath470 , this is only possible for @xmath471 for smaller values of @xmath125 , there is no other singularity and the free energy per length is given by eq . ( [ eq_freeenergy0 ] ) . if @xmath472 the additional singularity @xmath450 exists and is as we will see below always smaller than the singularity @xmath473 . thus , the free energy per length is given by the singularity @xmath450 in the strong coupling phase , i.e. , for @xmath472 . on the first sight , eq . ( [ eq_z1def ] ) still looks as if @xmath450 could only be calculated if the full function @xmath391 is known . however , for any @xmath472 we can define @xmath454 to be the unique solution of the equation @xmath474 this quantity depends only on the function @xmath434 . according to eq . ( [ eq_z1def ] ) , @xmath450 and @xmath454 are related by @xmath475 . this implies that @xmath476 . on the other hand , eq . ( [ eq_zrelation ] ) applied to @xmath477 yields @xmath478 which is finally an expression which involves only quantities of the non - interacting system . since @xmath479 is a monotonous function on the interval @xmath480 $ ] , we always have @xmath481 with equality if and only if @xmath467 , i.e. , for @xmath482 . therefore , the free energy per length is indeed given by @xmath483\ ] ] for any @xmath472 . 99 see , e.g. , w. saenger , _ principles of nucleic acid structure _ ( springer - verlag , new york , 1984 ) or b. alberts _ et al . _ , _ molecular biology of the cell _ ( garland publishing , new york , 1994 ) . see , e.g. , r.f . gesteland and j.f . atkins _ eds . _ , _ the rna world : the nature of modern rna suggests a prebiotic rna world _ ( cold spring harbor laboratory press , cold spring harbor , 1993 ) . k.a . dill _ et al . _ , _ protein sci . _ * 4 * , 561 ( 1995 ) . onuchic , z. luthey - schulten , and p.g . wolynes , _ annu . chem . _ * 48 * , 545 ( 1997 ) . t. garel , h. orland , and e. pitard , _ j. phys . i _ * 7 * , 1201 ( 1997 ) . shakhnovich , _ curr . op . biol . _ * 7 * , 29 ( 1997 ) . for a review see p.g . higgs , _ quart . biophys . _ * 33 * , 199253 ( 2000 ) . m. zuker and p. stiegler , _ nucl . res . _ * 9 * , 133148 ( 1981 ) . mccaskill , _ biopolymers _ * 29 * , 11051119 ( 1990 ) . hofacker , w. fontana , p.f . stadler , s. bonhoeffer , m. tacker , and p. schuster , _ monatshefte f. chemie _ * 125 * , 167188 ( 1994 ) . freier , r. kierzek , j.a . jaeger , n. sugimoto , m.h . caruthers , t. neilson , and d.h . turner , _ proc . usa _ * 83 * , 93739377 ( 1986 ) . i. tinoco jr and c. bustamante , _ biol . _ * 293 * 271281 ( 1999 ) and references therein . b. maier , d. bensimon , and v. croquette , _ proc . usa _ * 97 * , 1200212007 ( 2000 ) . de gennes , _ biopolymers _ * 6 * , 715 ( 1968 ) . higgs , _ phys . lett . _ * 76 * , 704707 ( 1996 ) . r. bundschuh and t. hwa , _ phys . lett . _ * 83 * , 14791483 ( 1999 ) . a. pagnani , g. parisi , and f. ricci - tersenghi , _ phys . * 84 * , 20262029 ( 2000 ) . hartmann , _ phys . _ * 86 * , 13821382 ( 2001 ) . a. pagnani , g. parisi , and f. ricci - tersenghi , _ phys . rev . lett . _ * 86 * , 13831383 ( 2001 ) . see , e.g. , p. young _ ed . _ , _ spin glasses and random fields _ ( world scientific , singapore , 1998 ) . d. moroz and t. hwa , in preparation . waterman , _ advan . in math . studies _ * 1 * , 167212 ( academic press , new york , 1978 ) . see , e.g. , m. mitas , _ nucl . acids res . _ * 25 * , 2245 - 2254 ( 1997 ) . see , e.g. , w. feller , _ an introduction to probability theory and its applications _ ( john wiley & sons , new york , 1950 ) . lubensky , j. isaacson , and s.p . obukhov , _ j. physique _ * 42 * , 15911601 ( 1981 ) . s.f . edwards and p.w . anderson , _ _ * f5 * , 965 ( 1975 ) . see , e.g. , m. mzard , g. parisi , and m.a . virasoro , _ spin glass theory and beyond _ ( world scientific , singapore , 1986 ) . r. arratia , l. gordon , and m. waterman , _ ann . stat . _ * 18 * , 539570 ( 1990 ) . d.a . huse and d.s . j. physique i _ * 1 * , 621625 ( 1991 ) . morgan and p.g . * 105 * , 71527157 ( 1996 ) . morgan and p.g . j. phys . a : math . gen . _ * 32 * , 31533170 ( 1998 ) . c. flamm , w. fontana , i.l . hofacker , and p. schuster , _ rna _ * 6 * , 325338 ( 2000 ) . h. isambert and e.d . siggia , _ proc . . usa _ * 97 * , 65156520 ( 2000 ) . u. gerland , r. bundschuh , and t. hwa , in preparation . cardy and s. ostlund , _ phys . b _ * 25 * , 68996909 ( 1982 ) . s.e . korshunov , _ phys . b _ * 48 * , 39693975 ( 1993 ) . t. hwa and d. fisher , _ phys . rev . b _ * 49 * , 31363154 ( 1994 ) . tang and h. chat , _ phys . lett . _ * 86 * , 830 ( 2001 ) . h. isambert , personal communication . j. zinn - justin , _ quantum field theory and critical phenomena _ ( oxford university press , united kingdom , 1989 ) . Abstract:
[ "the formation of secondary structures by a random rna sequence is studied as a model system for the sequence - structure problem omnipresent in biopolymers . several toy energy models are introduced to allow detailed analytical and numerical studies . first , a two - replica calculation is performed . by mapping the two - replica problem to the denaturation of a single homogeneous rna in @xmath0-dimensional embedding space , we show that sequence disorder is perturbatively irrelevant , i.e. , an rna molecule with weak sequence disorder is in a _ molten phase _ where many secondary structures with comparable total energy coexist . a numerical study of various models at high temperature reproduces behaviors characteristic of the molten phase . on the other hand , a scaling argument based on the extremal statistics of rare regions can be constructed to show that the low temperature phase is unstable to sequence disorder . we performed a detailed numerical study of the low temperature phase using the droplet theory as a guide , and characterized the statistics of large - scale , low - energy excitations of the secondary structures from the ground state structure . we find the excitation energy to grow very slowly ( i.e. , logarithmically ) with the length scale of the excitation , suggesting the existence of a marginal glass phase . the transition between the low temperature glass phase and the high temperature molten phase is also characterized numerically . it is revealed by a change in the coefficient of the logarithmic excitation energy , from being disorder dominated to entropy dominated ." ]
18,953
18,953
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: soft x - ray transients ( sxts ) are compact binary systems in which a low - mass secondary ( either a main - sequence star or a subgiant ) transfers mass via roche - lobe overflow onto a black hole ( bh ) or neutron star ( ns ) primary ( see reviews by tanaka & lewin 1995 ; van paradijs & mcclintock 1995 ; white , nagase & parmar 1995 ) . sxts have highly variable luminosities . they spend most of their lifetimes in a low luminosity quiescent state , but occasionally undergo dramatic outbursts during which both the optical and x - ray emission increase by several orders of magnitude ( e.g. chen , shrader & livio 1997 ; kuulkers 1998 ) . ns sxt outbursts typically occur every 1 - 10 years and last for several weeks , while bh sxt outbursts are typically separated by 10 - 50 years ( or perhaps longer ) and last for several months ( see chen et al . 1997 ) . a variety of observations ( see e.g. tanaka & shibazaki 1996 ) indicate that , near the peak of an outburst , sxts accrete matter via a standard thin disk ( shakura & sunyaev 1973 ) , so that there is little doubt that the accretion is radiatively efficient during this phase . the situation is more complex in quiescence . the spectra of quiescent bh sxts do not resemble that of a thin disk , and the accretion rates inferred from the observed x - ray luminosities disagree by orders of magnitude with the predictions of the standard disk instability model for quiescent disks ( e.g. lasota 1996 ) . narayan , mcclintock & yi ( 1996 ) and narayan , barret & mcclintock ( 1997 ) showed that the observations of quiescent bh sxts can be explained by a two - component accretion flow model consisting of an inner hot advection - dominated accretion flow ( adaf ; narayan & yi 1994 , 1995a ; abramowicz et al . 1995 ; ichimaru 1977 ; see narayan , mahadevan & quataert 1998 and kato , mineshige & fukue 1998 for reviews of adafs ) surrounded by an outer thin disk . in the recent version of this model described in narayan et al . ( 1997a ) , only the inner adaf contributes to the observed optical , uv and x - ray emission of the system . the outer thin disk acts mainly as a reservoir which accumulates mass until the next outburst is triggered . in quiescence , the emission of the disk is primarily in the infrared ; this radiation is hardly seen as it is swamped by the emission of the secondary ( see narayan et al . 1996 , 1997a and lasota , narayan & yi 1996 for details ) . a key feature of the narayan et al . ( 1996 , 1997a ) model of quiescent bh sxts is the low radiative efficiency of the adaf . in these flows , the bulk of the viscously dissipated energy is stored in the gas and advected with the flow into the black hole ( narayan & yi 1995b ; abramowicz et al . 1995 ; narayan et al . 1996 , 1997a ) . this explains the unusually low luminosities of bh sxts . by contrast , in ns sxts all the advected energy is expected to be radiated from the neutron star surface , resulting in a much higher radiative efficiency of the accretion flow even in the presence of an adaf ( narayan & yi 1995b ) . motivated by this fundamental distinction between black hole and neutron star systems , narayan , garcia & mcclintock ( 1997 ) and garcia et al . ( 1998 ) compared the outburst amplitudes of bh sxts and ns sxts as a function of their maximum luminosities and showed that the observations reveal systematically lower relative luminosities in bh sxts . they argued that this constitutes a confirmation of the presence of an event horizon in bh sxts . the argument was challenged by chen et al . ( 1998 ) . in this paper , we attempt to develop a physical understanding of the difference in quiescent luminosities between ns and bh sxts . we first show , in 2 , that there is indeed a significant difference in the observed quiescent luminosities of the two classes of objects , in contrast to the claim of chen et al . we then use binary evolution models in 3 to estimate mass transfer rates in sxts . we combine these estimates with the adaf+thin disk accretion scenario , taking into account the presence of an event horizon in bh systems and a reradiating surface in ns systems , to determine the expected x - ray luminosities in quiescence ( 4 ) . the model predictions agree well with the observations of quiescent bh sxts . however , the model substantially overestimates the luminosities of quiescent ns sxts . in 5 we show that the ns sxt data can be reconciled with the predictions of the model if we take into account the `` propeller effect '' ( illarionov & sunyaev 1975 ) , whereby the magnetosphere of a rapidly rotating neutron star prevents much of the accreting material from reaching the surface of the neutron star . in 6 we show that an adaf model with a moderate wind and a somewhat less efficient propeller ( in ns sxts ) , is also consistent with the observed quiescent luminosities of bh and ns sxts . finally , in 7 we discuss possible limitations and extensions of this work and in 8 we summarize the main results . in table [ tab : systems ] , we list key parameters of several ns and bh sxts : the orbital period @xmath0 , the distance @xmath1 , the quiescent x - ray luminosity @xmath2 in the @xmath3 kev x - ray band , and the mass @xmath4 ( in solar units ) of the compact primary . since our main interest is in the quiescent emission , we list only systems for which there exist reliable measurements of @xmath2 . the values of @xmath2 are taken from narayan et al . ( 1997b ) and garcia et al . ( 1998 ) , except for the bh sxt h1705 - 250 ( see below ) . in selecting the systems listed in table [ tab : systems ] , we were careful to avoid any possible confusion between bh and ns sxts , since this would make a comparison between the two sets of objects less reliable . thus , we limit our sample to the eight bh candidates that have firm _ dynamical _ lower limits on the mass of the primary ( e.g. mcclintock 1998 ) . ( note that this is not true for several so - called bh `` candidates '' of chen et al . 1998 , which seriously weakens their arguments . ) similarly , there is firm evidence that the five systems listed in table [ tab : systems ] as ns sxts contain ns primaries , based on the detection of type i x - ray bursts ( e.g. narayan et al . 1997b ; chen et al . 1997 ) . here we report a new and improved luminosity limit for h1705 - 250 ( = nova oph 77 ) based on the asca observation of 18 september 1996 , which we extracted from the heasarc archive . the exposure time was 31 ks , but unfortunately the target was near the chip boundaries which limits the effective area . the 4@xmath5 upper limit is @xmath6 c s@xmath7 , which corresponds to an x - ray flux @xmath8ergs s@xmath7@xmath9 . assuming a distance of 8.6 kpc , @xmath10ergs s@xmath7 . luminosities can be expressed in units of the eddington luminosity , @xmath11 where @xmath4 , the mass of the compact object in solar units , is listed in table [ tab : systems ] . for a standard radiative efficiency of @xmath12 % , the eddington luminosity corresponds to a mass accretion rate of @xmath13 in this section , we use both absolute luminosities and eddington - scaled luminosities in a system is not well known ( eq . [ [ eq : ledd ] ] ) . this is for instance the case of the bh sxt j1655 - 40 . orosz & bailyn ( 1997 ) estimate that @xmath14 in this system , while phillips et al . ( 1999 ) claim that @xmath4 could be as low as @xmath15 since it is not clear which is the more appropriate quantity for comparisons . our calculations in 3 suggest that the mass transfer rates in ns and bh sxts are similar when expressed in units of @xmath16 , especially at short orbital periods . thus , eddington - scaled luminosities might be more appropriate to compare the two classes of objects at short periods ( where most of the data lie ) . however , this argument is not very strong . therefore , we also show absolute luminosities , expressed in units of @xmath17 erg s@xmath7 ( which is roughly the luminosity expected from an object accreting at @xmath18 g s@xmath7 with a radiative efficiency of @xmath12 % ) . finally , the ratio @xmath19 ( which is independent of the distance @xmath1 ) is used for comparison with previous investigations of the luminosity difference between bh and ns sxts . the values of @xmath20 , the outburst peak luminosity , are taken from garcia et al . ( 1998 ) . in figure [ fig : lumtot ] , we show the quiescent luminosities of the bh and ns systems listed in table [ tab : systems ] as a function of their orbital periods @xmath0 . the open circles correspond to ns sxts and the filled dots correspond to bh systems . luminosity upper limits ( indicated by downward arrows ) are shown for five sxts , all of which are bh systems . the orbital period of the ns sxt h1608 - 52 is uncertain ( see table [ tab : systems ] ) and its location in figure [ fig : lumtot ] is indicated by dashed circles . among the undetected sxts , we choose to include in our sample only those systems that have been observed for more than 10 ks ( see table [ tab : systems ] herein , and also table 1 in narayan et al . 1997b ) , which therefore have flux limits @xmath21 ergs s@xmath7 with current x - ray satellites ( 0.5 - 10 kev ; rosat / asca ) . the argument for using @xmath0 along the horizontal axis of figure [ fig : lumtot ] is as follows . for any binary system with a low mass secondary , and transferring mass via roche - lobe overflow , the density of the secondary essentially determines @xmath0 . at a given @xmath0 , a bh sxt and a ns sxt will have similar secondaries , so that the mass transfer characteristics are likely to be similar . thus a reliable comparison of the radiative efficiencies of their accretion flows would be possible . in contrast , if we were to compare the quiescent luminosities of a bh sxt and a ns sxt with quite different @xmath0 , a difference in the mass transfer rates ( see 3 ) could mask actual differences in the radiative efficiencies of the accretion flows . this point , which is the motivation for the calculations in 3 , was first emphasized by lasota & hameury ( 1998 ) . figure [ fig : lumtot ] strongly suggests that bh sxts are fainter than ns sxts . this is especially true when the data are plotted in eddington units ( fig . [ fig : lumtot]a ) , but it is reasonably convincing even in absolute units ( fig . [ fig : lumtot]b ) or in terms of the ratio @xmath22 ( fig . [ fig : lumtot]c ) . note that all five of the ns sxts have been detected in quiescence and have well measured values of @xmath2 , while the majority of bh sxts have only upper limits on @xmath2 . in our view , this is significant and underlines the effect we are claiming . to make a clearer comparison between bh and ns sxts with the existing data , we isolate in figure [ fig : lumfirm ] those systems for which @xmath2 and @xmath0 are well determined ( see also the very similar fig . 3 of lasota & hameury 1998 ) . although there are only a few systems in this figure , we feel that we can conclude that ( at least in this small sample ) bh sxts in quiescence are less luminous than ns sxts . the difference is as much as two orders of magnitude ( in eddington units ) for short period systems . it is important to stress here the excellent upper limit on the quiescent luminosity of the bh sxt j0422 + 32 . this upper limit is nearly equal to the very low measured quiescent luminosity of a0620 - 00 . thus , there are now two bh sxts that are two orders of magnitude less luminous , in eddington units , than quiescent ns sxts with comparable @xmath0 . it is important to carry out more sensitive observations of those bh sxts which have only upper limits currently . narayan et al . ( 1997b ) explained the difference in quiescent luminosities of ns sxts and bh sxts as due to the presence of a hard surface in ns sxts vs an event horizon in bh sxts . the presence of a surface causes the radiative efficiency in ns sxts to be high , while in bh sxts most of the dissipated energy is advected into the event horizon of the bh , without producing observable emission . narayan et al . argued that this constitutes observational evidence for event horizons in black holes . in the remainder of the paper , we expand on this idea and construct a physical model of accretion in ns and bh systems to explain quantitatively the observations summarized in figure [ fig : lumfirm ] . in 3 we estimate the mass transfer rate in sxts , and in 4 and 5 we describe an accretion model that is able to reproduce the observed emission in the @xmath3 kev band . the theory of binary evolution relies on the roche - lobe model for the description of mass transfer ( frank , king & raine 1992 ) . depending on which mechanism drives the mass transfer , whether it is loss of orbital angular momentum through gravitational radiation and magnetic braking , or expansion of the donor as it evolves away from the main - sequence , the binaries are classified as j - driven or n - driven systems . there is a ` bifurcation ' orbital period @xmath23 separating the two classes such that for @xmath24 we find n - driven systems whose orbital periods increase with time , and for @xmath25 we find j - driven systems whose @xmath26 decrease with time . although there is no unique value of @xmath23 , because it depends on the donor mass and the strength of angular momentum losses , estimates range from @xmath27 days ( e.g. pylyser & savonije 1988 ; king , kolb & burderi 1996 ) . the exact form of the magnetic braking law is not well established ( see e.g. kalogera , kolb & king 1998 ) . moreover , menou , narayan & lasota ( 1998 ) showed that there is strong circumstantial evidence that magnetic braking ( mb ) is weak in bh sxts . in the following , for simplicity , we neglect the influence of mb in bh and ns sxts . we will see in 4.2 that any contribution to the mass transfer by mb would only strengthen the argument that ns sxts shed mass rather than accrete it . following king et al . ( 1996 ) , the mass transfer rates in j - driven systems with gravitational radiation ( gr ) and n - driven system with secondary expansion ( exp ) is given by : @xmath28 where @xmath29 is the mass of the secondary in solar units , @xmath0 is scaled in units of 1 day . the secondary in j - driven binaries is usually a main - sequence star ( see king et al . 1996 for possible complications ) filling its roche lobe . these stars obey the simple relation @xmath30 ( e.g. frank et al . 1992 ) . the prediction for @xmath31 in case of gr driven mass transfer then becomes @xmath32 which scales with the mass of the primary as @xmath33 for small @xmath29 . note this is not very different from @xmath34 , thus motivating the use of the eddington scaling of luminosity in figs . [ fig : lumtot ] and [ fig : lumfirm ] equation ( [ ev ] ) for the case of secondary expansion is the linear limit of third - order polynomial fits ( king 1988 ) to detailed evolutionary tracks of single stars computed by webbink , rappaport & savonije ( 1983 ) . along an evolutionary track , the mass @xmath29 of the expanding secondary decreases as it transfers mass onto the primary . since a variety of initial masses and orbital periods ( at the onset of mass - transfer ) are possible , @xmath29 is essentially a free parameter in equation ( [ ev ] ) . however , a careful study of evolutionary tracks shows that the band of mass transfer rates predicted by equation ( [ ev ] ) for values of @xmath29 in the range 0.5 to 1 reproduces the mass transfer rates in n - driven accreting binaries for the majority of their lifetime . this band therefore provides , in a `` population synthesis '' sense , the likely mass transfer rates one can expect in sxts with orbital periods larger than the bifurcation period . we estimate the mass transfer rate expected at a given orbital period by simply adding the contributions from gr ( eq . [ [ gr ] ] ) and secondary expansion ( a band with @xmath35 $ ] in eq . [ [ ev ] ] ) . figure [ fig : accrate ] shows that this results in a relatively short , although plausible , bifurcation period @xmath36 hr . the estimates of @xmath37 are shown separately for bh and ns sxts , in units of @xmath18 g s@xmath7 . the mass transfer rates are typically similar , in absolute units , in bh and ns sxts with long orbital periods . however , the mass transfer rate in bh sxts is larger than in ns sxts at short orbital periods ( cf eq . [ [ gr ] ] and its scaling with @xmath4 ) ; the two are in fact quite close in eddington units at these periods , where the majority of sxts are found . although this result neglects any contribution from magnetic braking , we think that it is significant enough to motivate the use of eddington - scaled luminosities in figs . [ fig : lumtot ] and [ fig : lumfirm ] . note that the comparable values of eddington - scaled @xmath31 predicted for bh sxts and ns sxts at short periods contrast with the large eddington - scaled luminosity difference of the two classes of objects ( figs . [ fig : lumtot ] and [ fig : lumfirm ] ) . this in essence is the argument of narayan et al . ( 1997b ) and garcia et al . ( 1998 ) , and we confirm their claim . the sample is , however , small . although the estimates shown in fig . [ fig : accrate ] rely on simple considerations that do not take into account the full complexity of mass transfer ( in particular , substantial fluctuations of the mass transfer rates around the secular values used here may occur ; e.g. warner 1995 ) , they probably provide better than an order - of - magnitude precision , which is sufficient for our discussion . note , however , that this simple model is not likely to give an accurate value of @xmath37 for the bh sxt j1655 - 40 since this system seems to be in a special evolutionary state ( crossing the hertzsprung gap , e.g. kolb 1998 ) . following narayan et al . ( 1996 , 1997a ) , we assume that the accretion flow is made of two components : an inner adaf and an outer thin accretion disk . since only the adaf contributes to the emission of quiescent sxts in the 0.5 - 10 kev band , we ignore the thin disk . further , since the emission of the adaf is primarily from regions close to the center , we do not concern ourselves with the precise value of the radius @xmath38 at which the transition between the adaf and the thin disk occurs . although the adaf model was initially proposed for quiescent bh sxts , there is no reason why it should not apply also to quiescent ns sxts . in particular , if the transition of the accretion flow from a thin disk configuration to an adaf configuration is triggered by the same local physics in the disk , e.g. a thermal instability in the upper layers of the disk ( shaviv & wehrse 1986 ; meyer & meyer - hofmeister 1994 ; narayan & yi 1995b ) , the process should occur independently of the nature of the central object . we note , however , that the presence of a reradiating surface in the case of a ns primary at the center of the adaf may have significant effects on the adaf . for instance , narayan & yi ( 1995b ) showed that the critical accretion rate @xmath39 in an adaf is reduced in the case of a ns ( compared to a bh ) because the additional supply of soft photons ( from the stellar surface ) causes the adaf to cool more efficiently . this is not an issue here since @xmath40 in all the quiescent systems we study is well below @xmath41 . we assume conservative mass transfer . consequently , if @xmath42 is the rate at which mass is accreted during quiescence via the adaf and @xmath43 is the rate at which mass is accumulated in the outer thin disk , the mass transfer rate satisfies @xmath44 . the proportion of mass accreted vs. mass accumulated in quiescence is , however , uncertain . menou et al . ( 1998 ) estimated the relative importance of @xmath42 and @xmath43 for most of the bh sxts listed in table [ tab : systems ] . they estimated @xmath43 by taking the integrated fluences of the outbursts of each source and assuming a radiative efficiency of @xmath45 ( which provides the total mass accreted in the outburst ) , and estimated @xmath46 by fitting the quiescent emission with an adaf model . menou et al.s work indicates that , in quiescent bh sxts , roughly half the matter that is transferred from the secondary is accreted via the adaf and the rest is accumulated in the thin disk , i.e. @xmath47 in the following models , we treat @xmath48 as a free parameter , but we expect @xmath48 to be of order unity both in bh sxts and in ns sxts . the version of the adaf model used here is described in detail by narayan et al . ( 1998a ) . it consistently includes adiabatic compressive heating of electrons in the energy equation ( nakamura et al . 1997 ) and it uses for the flow dynamics the general relativistic global solutions calculated by popham & gammie ( 1998 ) . in previous studies involving adafs , most of the model parameters were kept fixed at the following values ( see narayan et al . 1998b for a discussion ) : @xmath49 ( the viscosity parameter in the adaf ) , @xmath50 ( i.e. equipartition between the gas and the magnetic field ) , @xmath51 ( adiabatic index of the gas ) and @xmath52 ( fraction of the viscous dissipation that goes directly into heating the electrons ) . we adopt these standard values of @xmath53 , @xmath54 and @xmath55 in the present models ( see 6 for the effect of varying @xmath56 ) . we take @xmath37 to be given by the predictions of binary evolution models ( fig . [ fig : accrate ] ) and obtain @xmath46 via equation ( [ eq : g ] ) for a given assumed value of @xmath48 . we calculate the spectral energy distributions of the models and numerically integrate the spectra to obtain the luminosities in the 0.5 - 10 kev band . the results are discussed in the following sections . figure [ fig : lumbh]a shows two bands of luminosities corresponding to adaf models of bh sxts . in the upper band @xmath57 , i.e. the entire @xmath37 is accreted by the black hole via the adaf , while in the lower band @xmath58 ( or @xmath59 ) . the lower band is in satisfying agreement with the observed luminosities . the fact that we obtain agreement with a reasonable value of @xmath48 means that the modeling of the quiescent x - ray emission of bh sxts with the adaf model is consistent with the predictions of binary evolution models . the increase in the luminosity with increasing @xmath0 is also in good agreement . one should stress again , however , that the agreement for the bh sxt j1655 - 40 is unexpected if the system is crossing the hertzsprung gap ( kolb 1998 ) . the bolometric radiative efficiency in the adaf models constructed here is typically @xmath60 compared to @xmath61 for standard thin disk accretion . the x - ray radiative efficiency of these adaf models is another two or three orders of magnitude lower since much of the adaf luminosity comes out as synchrotron radiation in the optical . note that these results are sensitive to various details of the adaf models , and in particular to the choice of @xmath53 and @xmath54 . for instance , we find that , if @xmath62 , we need @xmath63 ( i.e. a fraction @xmath64 of the mass supplied by the secondary must be accreted via the adaf ) in order to obtain agreement with the observed quiescent luminosities of bh sxts . the fraction goes down further to @xmath65 if @xmath66 . the presence of a hard surface on the accreting star is the key feature of adaf models of ns sxts . the large amount of energy advected in the adaf , which is lost through the event horizon in bh sxts , will be reradiated from the ns surface ( narayan & yi 1995b ) . narayan et al . ( 1997b ) and garcia et al . ( 1998 ) argued that this additional source of luminosity is the explanation for the systematically larger luminosity of quiescent ns sxts as compared to quiescent bh sxts ( figs [ fig : lumtot ] and [ fig : lumfirm ] ) . we now investigate this quantitatively . in the following , we assume that the thermal energy stored in the adaf is reradiated as blackbody emission with a radiative efficiency @xmath67 . the luminosity in the 0.5 - 10 kev band will be dominated by the emission coming from the ns surface , so that the additional emission from the adaf can be ignored ( for simplicity ) . we also assume that the reradiation occurs from a small fraction @xmath68 of the ns . this is in agreement with observations of quiescent ns sxts ( e.g. verbunt et al . 1994 ; campana et al . 1998 ; but see rutledge et al . 1998 and the discussion in 7 ) . for now , we do not seek to justify the small emitting area of the ns . we simply assume for all our ns models that the area is @xmath69 . however , our results are not seriously affected even if the radiating area is increased or decreased by , say , an order of magnitude ( i.e as long as most of the blackbody emission is in the 0.5 - 10 kev x - ray band ) . the typical effective temperatures found are @xmath70 kev . the upper band in fig . [ fig : lumbh]b shows the luminosities predicted by binary evolution models if @xmath59 , i.e a third of the mass transferred by the secondary is accreted onto the ns ( as in bh sxts ) . we see that the luminosities predicted are much larger than those observed , by @xmath71 orders of magnitude ( except for the system exo 0748 - 676 ; see 7 for a discussion of this system ) . since any contribution to the mass transfer by magnetic braking would only increase the mass transfer rates expected ( in short orbital period systems ) , the discrepancy between the observed and predicted luminosities would be even more serious if magnetic braking were effective . one possibility for the discrepancy is that most of the quiescent flux from ns sxts is emitted outside the 0.5 - 10 kev x - ray band . this explanation seems , however , rather unlikely since this emission would be seen somewhere else in the spectrum , say in hard x - rays or soft @xmath55-rays . aql x-1 has been observed in quiescence in hard x - rays and it is clear that the energy does not come out in the 10 - 100 kev band ( campana et al . 1998 ) . in addition , although some theoretical models of boundary layers between an accretion flow and a ns predict substantial deviations from blackbody emission at higher energies ( e.g. shapiro & salpeter 1975 , turolla et al . 1994 ) , there are no models predicting that such a large fraction ( @xmath72 ) of the emission would come out in hard x - rays or @xmath55-rays . we must therefore consider the possibility that only part of the mass supplied by the secondary actually reaches the surface of the ns . the lower band in fig . [ fig : lumbh]b shows that the luminosities of quiescent ns sxts can be accounted for ( except exo 0748 - 676 ) if only @xmath73 of the transferred mass reaches the ns surface . this is of course a surprisingly small fraction . in such a disk ; e.g. cannizzo 1993 ) , we do not favor this interpretation because the propeller effect should operate in this case and prevent any mass from reaching the ns surface ( see 5 ) ] . in the following section , we argue that the propeller effect can explain the fraction if combined with accretion via an adaf , while in 6 we consider the possibility that winds from adafs could further reduce the amount of mass reaching the ns surface . the propeller effect in accreting neutron stars was initially proposed by illarionov & sunyaev ( 1975 ) to explain the existence of long - period x - ray pulsars , and it was later developed in more detail by davies and pringle ( 1981 ; see also wang & robertson 1985 ; stella et al . although the details vary , the basic mechanism of the effect relies on the presence of a centrifugal barrier at the rotating magnetosphere of a rapidly spinning ns . inside the magnetosphere , the accreting gas is forced to follow the magnetic field lines of the ns since , by definition , in this region magnetic forces dominate the flow dynamics . the fate of the gas is then determined by the relative magnitudes of the magnetospheric radius , @xmath74 , and the corotation radius , @xmath75 , defined by @xmath76 , where @xmath77 is the angular velocity of the ns ( and the magnetosphere ) . if @xmath78 , the magnetosphere rotates so fast that the centrifugal force at @xmath74 is larger than the force of gravity and hardly any of the gas can be accreted onto the ns . this is the propeller effect . the efficiency of the propeller effect is not well understood ( see davies , fabian , & pringle 1979 , and davies & pringle 1981 ) . it is also not clear whether the accreting matter is ejected from the system or is merely accumulated in a boundary layer around the magnetosphere ( wang & robertson 1985 ) . however , from the simple physical argument outlined above , it is clear that normal accretion onto the neutron star is inhibited during the propeller phase . the first direct observational evidence for the existence of the propeller effect in accreting neutron stars was reported by cui ( 1997 ) in two x - ray pulsars , gx 1 + 4 and gro j1744 - 28 . cui showed that in both systems x - ray pulsations ceased during a period of low x - ray flux , which he interpreted as the result of a decrease in the mass accretion rate and a corresponding increase in the magnetospheric radius to beyond the corotation radius . campana et al . ( 1998 ) and zhang et al . ( 1998 ) argued that the propeller effect was also seen in a ns sxt , aql x-1 , during its most recent outburst ; the system showed an abrupt decrease of the x - ray flux , accompanied by considerable hardening of the x - ray spectrum . both sets of authors proposed that the hard spectrum originates just outside the magnetosphere , where the gas becomes very hot due to the action of the propeller ( see also cui et al . 1998 ) . observations of aql x-1 show that even in quiescence the blackbody spectral component does not disappear entirely implying that a small amount of material continues to accrete onto the star , contrary to simple models of the propeller ( verbunt et al . 1994 ; stella et al . 1994 ) . to resolve this problem , zhang et al . ( 1998 ) proposed that accretion in quiescent ns sxts occurs via a quasi - spherical adaf , rather than a thin disk . this allows some material to accrete near the poles , thereby bypassing the centrifugal barrier . in this section we develop this idea quantitatively . in the following , we assume for simplicity that the ns spin axis is perpendicular to the binary orbital plane and that the ns spin and magnetic axes are aligned . in the presence of a spherical accretion flow ( e.g. bondi 1952 ) , the magnetospheric ( or alfvn ) radius , @xmath74 , is usually defined as the radius at which the magnetic pressure , @xmath79 , due to the neutron star magnetic field balances the ram pressure , @xmath80 , of the accreting gas , where @xmath81 is the radial infall velocity of the gas ( e.g. frank et al . 1992 ) . the contribution from the thermal pressure of the gas is generally neglected when considering bondi - type flows which are highly supersonic ( free - falling ) . an adaf , on the other hand , is subsonic down to a few schwarzschild radii ( e.g. narayan , kato , & honma 1997 ; chen , abramowicz & lasota 1997 ; abramowicz , chen , granath & lasota 1996 ) and the thermal pressure term must be taken into account . the polar structure of adafs was described by narayan & yi ( 1995a ) in the self - similar approximation . they showed that in the limit of strong advection ( @xmath82 ) , the gas density and temperature ( and therefore the thermal pressure of the gas ) are essentially independent of the polar angle @xmath83 ; i.e. these quantities are nearly constant on spherical shells centered on the accreting object . on the other hand , the radial infall velocity is smaller than the thermal sound speed in the equatorial plane and decreases towards the poles . clearly then , the thermal pressure of the accreting material is the dominant term in calculating the magnetospheric radius . since this pressure is constant with @xmath83 , the magnetosphere will be nearly spherical . despite the difference between a bondi spherical accretion flow and an adaf , the value of @xmath74 is roughly the same in the two cases . in the former , essentially all the gravitational energy released during accretion goes into bulk kinetic energy of the flow , while in adafs , the energy is stored as thermal energy of the gas . thus , the ram pressure in bondi flows must be of the same order as the thermal pressure in adafs . the magnetospheric radius in quiescence then takes the same form ( frank et al . 1992 ) : @xmath84 where @xmath85 is the ns surface magnetic field in units of @xmath86 g and @xmath87 is the ns radius in units of @xmath88 cm . for the remainder of the paper , @xmath89 refers to the radius in physical units and @xmath90 refers to the radius in schwarzschild units . the propeller effect in binary systems is generally discussed in the context of thin disk accretion . in this model , once the propeller becomes effective , no matter is able to reach the ns surface because the centrifugal acceleration acts equally against gravity for all the matter located in the disk orbital plane . in a spherical flow , however , the centrifugal acceleration at the magnetospheric radius acting on a parcel of gas , accreting at a polar angle @xmath83 from the spin axis , is equal to @xmath91 , where @xmath77 is the angular speed of the magnetic field lines anchored in the ns . the direction of this force is perpendicular to the spin axis of the ns ( and parallel to the orbital plane ) , so that the component of @xmath92 along the radial direction is simply @xmath93 . the maximum polar angle below which the gravitational acceleration ( @xmath94 ) wins over the centrifugal force is given by @xmath95 for @xmath96 this simplifies to @xmath97 note that the residual force acting on all parcels of gas , even those which do not overcome the centrifugal barrier , tends to direct them toward the orbital plane . in this simple formulation , we do not consider possible complications due to field line orientation effects . only matter accreting between @xmath98 and @xmath99 can overcome the centrifugal barrier and reach the surface of the ns . the mass accretion rate onto the star is then @xmath100 where @xmath101 is the gas density and @xmath102 is the radial infall velocity at angle @xmath83 ( positive outward ) , as given by the self - similar solution of narayan & yi ( 1995a ) . the factor of @xmath103 in equation ( [ eq : mdotrtheta ] ) is introduced to account for the two polar caps . the fraction of the total mass accretion rate @xmath104 in the adaf that reaches the ns surface is then @xmath105 where the last two steps have been calculated in the limit of small @xmath106 . for a neutron star with a spin period of @xmath103 ms , a magnetic field strength of @xmath107 g and accreting at @xmath108 , we find @xmath109 . note that if the radial velocity does not vary as @xmath110 but is more nearly constant with @xmath83 ( as in bondi accretion ) , then @xmath111 would be larger ( e.g. , if @xmath112 is independent of @xmath83 , @xmath113 only ) . on the other hand , if the accretion flow has a toroidal morphology with empty funnels along the rotation axis , @xmath111 would be much lower than the expression given in equation ( [ eq : facc ] ) , perhaps even zero . there is thus considerable uncertainty in the value of @xmath111 . we assume that the gas accreted during the propeller phase follows the magnetic field lines down to the ns polar caps , where its kinetic and thermal energy is converted to radiation . dipolar field lines satisfy the parametric equation ( e.g. frank et al . 1992 ) : @xmath114 where @xmath115 is constant for a given field line . thus , the field lines intersecting the magnetospheric radius at @xmath116 , emerge from the ns surface at a polar angle @xmath117 given by : @xmath118 the accreting material reaches the ns surface at @xmath119 , and therefore the fraction of the neutron star surface that re - radiates the accreted energy is @xmath120 where we have made use of the fact that @xmath121 . note the direct dependence of @xmath68 on the ns magnetic field strength @xmath122 through @xmath123 . for a neutron star with a spin period of @xmath103 ms , a magnetic field strength of @xmath107 g and accreting at @xmath124 , we find @xmath125 . equations ( [ eq : facc ] ) and ( [ eq : fsurf ] ) demonstrate that in quiescence the mass accretion rate onto a ns and the emitting area , which determine the total luminosity and spectrum of the system , depend strongly on the ns angular rotation speed @xmath77 and the field strength . although @xmath77 is not known for most ns sxts , we discuss in this section how it can be estimated using our knowledge of the accretion history of an sxt and of the interaction between the magnetosphere of the ns and the accretion flow . during the propeller phase , in quiescence , the ns ejects most of the accreting gas that reaches its magnetosphere . the ejected material leaves the system with higher specific angular momentum than it had coming in , which results in an effective spin - down of the ns . however , ns sxts experience outbursts during which the mass accretion rate onto the ns is orders of magnitude higher than in quiescence . high @xmath126 causes the magnetosphere to shrink inside the corotation radius so that all the accreting gas is able to reach the ns surface . the mass and angular momentum of the accreting gas is added to the ns , which causes it to spin - up . a ns sxt that accretes for a fairly long time is expected to reach an equilibrium spin frequency @xmath127 such that the spin up during outburst is balanced by the spin down during quiescence . at the onset of mass transfer , the spin period of the ns in an sxt is likely to be different from the equilibrium value . in standard ghosh & lamb ( 1979 ) type models ( for steady disks ) , the timescale @xmath128 on which a typical ns reaches the equilibrium spin period is usually small ( @xmath129 yr ) compared to the lifetime of the lmxb ( @xmath130 yr ; see , e.g. , henrichs 1983 for a review ) . although @xmath128 may be a little larger for transient accretion , it is reasonable to assume that most of the neutron stars in sxts have rotation rates close to @xmath131 . it is straightforward to show that @xmath77 is basically unaffected by a single outburst or a single quiescent phase , because the time spent between two outbursts ( @xmath132 a few years ) is much shorter than @xmath128 . therefore , it is not necessary to consider the small jitter in @xmath77 during the quiescence - outburst cycle . in the following , we simply assume that once a ns sxt has reached spin equilibrium , then @xmath133 both during outburst and quiescence . to determine the equilibrium spin frequency of a ns in a transient binary system we need a theoretical description of the interaction between the ns and the accretion flow . we begin with the outburst phase during which accretion occurs via a thin disk and the torque exerted by the accreting gas on the ns is relatively well understood . despite some modifications , current models describing the interaction between a ns and a magnetically threaded thin accretion disk remain essentially identical to the model initially proposed by ghosh & lamb ( 1979 ) . in this model , the spin - up torque on the ns results from two contributions . first , the gas that follows magnetic field lines and reaches the ns surface gives its angular momentum to the ns ( spin - up ) . second , the interaction between the magnetic field lines and the threaded thin disk beyond the magnetospheric radius results in a positive torque on the ns for radii where the field lines rotate slower than the local keplerian angular speed of the gas . the lines that thread the disk further out give a ( smaller ) negative torque on the ns since these field lines rotate faster than the local keplerian angular speed of the gas ( gosh & lamb 1979 ) . recent detailed numerical simulations by daumerie ( 1996 ) show that the overall contribution resulting from the interaction of the accretion flow and the magnetic field lines beyond the magnetospheric radius is nearly equal to the contribution to the spin - up from the gas reaching the ns surface . further , daumerie finds that the torque varies roughly linearly with the fastness parameter @xmath134 . using this work as a guide , we propose the following idealized formula for the torque : @xmath135 , \label{eq : idealtorque}\ ] ] where the factor of 2 appears because of the two nearly equal contributions to the spin - up mentioned above . equation ( [ eq : idealtorque ] ) assumes that the fastness parameter at equilibrium , @xmath136 , is exactly unity . this is consistent with the recent arguments of wang ( 1995 ; see also wang 1987 ) . the torque in the propeller regime , when @xmath137 , is not as well constrained . by analogy with ghosh & lamb type models , we assume that the torque arises from two nearly equal contributions . one contribution is the negative torque applied to the ns when the propeller expels gas at the magnetosphere and the other is the negative torque for all @xmath138 . ] due to the interaction of the magnetic field lines with the accretion flow beyond the magnetospheric radius . if the gas expelled leaves the magnetosphere with an angular momentum corresponding to the angular rotation speed of the ns , viz . @xmath77 ( which corresponds to an efficient propeller ) , then the negative torque on the ns in the propeller phase is @xmath139 where @xmath126 is the rate at which mass reaches the magnetosphere . ( the small positive contribution from the very small fraction of mass accreted on to the ns is neglected . ) this expression is in agreement with equation ( [ eq : idealtorque ] ) in the limit of @xmath140 . therefore , we can use the prescription given by equation ( [ eq : idealtorque ] ) to describe the interaction between the ns and the accretion flow throughout the outburst quiescence cycle . we define @xmath141 to be the integrated spin - up torque over an outburst of duration @xmath142 , and @xmath143 to be the integrated spin - down torque during a propeller phase of duration @xmath144 . the recurrence time of the sxt is @xmath145 . we assume , for simplicity , that the two phases can be approximated as bimodal , with the outburst phase occurring at a typical accretion rate @xmath146 and the quiescent phase having a typical lower accretion rate @xmath147 . these accretion rates define , in turn , the values of the magnetospheric radius in outburst , ] ) ] @xmath148 , and in quiescence , @xmath123 , used in equation ( [ eq : idealtorque ] ) to determine @xmath149 and @xmath150 . since the accretion rate from the peak of the outburst is known to decrease gradually with time , the value of @xmath146 used to determine @xmath148 should be interpreted as a mean over the outburst . by definition , the ns angular rotation speed at equilibrium @xmath131 satisfies @xmath151 . using equation ( [ eq : idealtorque ] ) , we find @xmath152}{\left [ 1 + \left ( \frac{r_{\rm mq}}{r_{\rm mo } } \right)^{2 } \tilde{g } \right ] } , \label{eq : eqomega}\ ] ] where @xmath153 is the ratio @xmath154 , i.e. the total mass reaching the magnetosphere during the adaf - propeller phase divided by the total mass accreted during outburst . this definition of @xmath153 is equivalent to the definition of @xmath48 given in equation ( [ eq : g ] ) if all the mass accumulated in the disk during quiescence is accreted onto the neutron star during outburst . ) remains valid because @xmath131 depends on the ratio @xmath155 for the remainder of the paper , we assume @xmath156 . note that the spin equilibrium period defined by equation ( [ eq : eqomega ] ) differs from the spin equilibrium period defined for _ steady _ accretion onto a ns and usually discussed in the literature ( e.g. henrichs 1983 ) . equation ( [ eq : eqomega ] ) allows us to determine the equilibrium spin period @xmath157 as a function of the parameter @xmath158 . this , in turn , allows us to estimate the quantities @xmath111 ( eq . [ [ eq : facc ] ] ) and @xmath68 ( eq . [ [ eq : fsurf ] ] ) which are relevant for determining the observational properties of quiescent ns sxts . in the following calculations , we assume for definiteness that the ns accretes at the eddington rate ( @xmath159 ) in outburst and that the mass transfer accretion rate in quiescence is @xmath160 ( cf fig . [ fig : accrate ] ) . however , our conclusions do not depend crucially on these assumptions . figures [ fig : eqfacc ] and [ fig : eqbyp ] show the variations of @xmath161 , @xmath162 and @xmath157 with @xmath48 . as @xmath46 decreases , the magnetosphere becomes more extended and the propeller effect becomes more efficient . the solid lines show the results for a ns with a magnetic field strength @xmath163 g , while the dashed and dotted lines show the cases @xmath164 and @xmath165 g , respectively . recent observations suggest that accreting neutron stars in low mass binaries have rather low magnetic fields , typically @xmath166 g ( e.g. white & zhang 1997 ) . figure [ fig : eqfacc ] can be related to fig . [ fig : lumbh]b , where we found that @xmath167 was needed in order to explain the very low observed luminosities of quiescent ns sxts . such a value of @xmath168 is predicted by the propeller model if @xmath169 . this value of @xmath48 is reasonably close to the value @xmath170 that we obtained for bh sxts . note that the dependence of @xmath168 on the magnetic field @xmath122 should cancel out through the ratios @xmath171 in equation ( [ eq : eqomega ] ) . for low magnetic field strengths , however , the inner edge of the disk in outburst is not given by half the value in equation ( [ eq : rmq ] ) but is fixed at the last stable orbit at 3 schwarzschild radii ( for instance , if @xmath172 and @xmath173 g ) . consequently , there is a residual dependence of @xmath168 on @xmath122 for small @xmath122 . figure [ fig : eqbyp]a shows that the fraction @xmath68 of the ns surface that emits in quiescence depends much more strongly on @xmath122 than @xmath111 does ( fig . [ fig : eqfacc ] ) , as expected from equation ( [ eq : fsurf ] ) . for values of @xmath169 and low magnetic fields ( @xmath166 g ) , the emitting surface is typically between @xmath174 and @xmath69 . observations of quiescent ns sxts suggest an emitting surface @xmath175 ( e.g. verbunt et al . 1994 ; campana et al . 1998 ; but see 7 ) . given that the surface could very well be underestimated by the standard techniques ( e.g. lewin , van paradijs & taam 1993 ; rajagopal & romani 1996 ; zavlin et al . 1996 ; rutledge et al . 1998 ) , values of @xmath176 appear in reasonable agreement with the observations . we note , however , that this result depends quite crucially on the assumed alignment of the ns spin and magnetic axes . this is a major uncertainty in the calculations . figure [ fig : eqbyp]b shows that @xmath157 is even more sensitive to the value of @xmath122 . for weak magnetic fields ( @xmath177 g ) , the values of the equilibrium spin period are in the range @xmath178 ms , which is in agreement with values recently discussed in the literature for accreting neutron stars in low mass binaries ( e.g. white & zhang 1997 ) . there are several sources of uncertainty in our simplified model for the propeller , which are discussed in 6.2 and 7 below . the proximity of the value @xmath170 required to explain the quiescent luminosities of bh sxts to the value @xmath169 required to explain the luminosities of ns sxts ( with a propeller ) suggests , however , that roughly the same geometry of accretion ( outer thin disk and inner adaf sharing the mass supplied by the secondary roughly equally ) can account for the properties of both classes of objects . the presence of a hard surface and a magnetic field associated with the spinning neutron star are two major ingredients of the model . the ns sxts aql x-1 ( @xmath179 g , @xmath180 ms , emitting area @xmath181 km@xmath182 ; white & zhang 1997 ; zhang et al . 1998 ; campana et al . 1998 ) and sax j1808.4 - 3658 ( @xmath183 g , @xmath184 ms ; wijnands & van der klis 1998 ; chakrabarty & morgan 1998 , hereafter cm98 ) are two interesting candidates that could allow further testing of the predictions of our adaf - propeller scenario . we note that cm98 inferred a mass transfer rate in sax j1808.4 - 3658 @xmath185 m@xmath186 yr@xmath7 , which is roughly a factor ten less than the value for a 2 hr orbital period ns sxt according to our fig . [ fig : accrate ] . these authors find that the estimate is consistent with mass transfer being driven by angular momentum losses due to gravitational radiation , if the secondary star has a mass @xmath187 . the values shown in fig . [ fig : accrate ] , however , were deduced assuming that the donor star is a main sequence star which satisfies @xmath188 ( 3 ) . this is apparently not the case in sax j1808.4 - 3658 , perhaps because of the fact that the companion star is strongly irradiated ( cm98 ) . the gas in an adaf could in principle escape to infinity via a wind because part of the flow may be unbound . narayan & yi ( 1994 , 1995a ) showed that the bernoulli constant , a measure of the energy of the gas at infinity , is positive in their self - similar solution , and narayan , kato & honma ( 1997 ) showed that this is also the case in a global solution . a simple way of taking this into account was proposed by blandford & begelman ( 1998 ; hereafter bb98 ) who derived self - similar adaf solutions that include mass loss via winds . our results in 4.1 suggest that reducing @xmath189 has only a small effect on the radiative efficiency of the accretion flow . quataert & narayan ( 1998 ) showed , however , that an efficient way of increasing the radiative efficiency of the adaf is to include winds and simultaneously increase the value of the parameter @xmath56 , the fraction of the viscously dissipated energy that directly heats the electrons . they found that models with winds and high @xmath56 are consistent with the current observations for the bh sxt v404 cyg in quiescence and the galactic center source sgr a*. note that theoretical estimates of the value of @xmath56 are highly uncertain . quataert ( 1998 ) and gruzinov ( 1998 ) argued that @xmath56 could be small if the magnetic fields in the adaf are fairly subthermal , but bisnovatyi - kogan & lovelace(1997 ; see also quataert & gruzinov 1998 ) argued that magnetic reconnection in the accretion flow could preferentially heat the electrons and lead to large values of @xmath56 ( @xmath190 ) . in 6.1 and 6.2 , we investigate the following two questions . can winds by themselves , i.e. without any propeller effect , explain the observed quiescent luminosities of ns sxts ? if not , is a combination of winds and a propeller consistent with the observations ? following bb98 , we assume that the accretion rate in the adaf scales in a self - similar way , i.e. @xmath191 where @xmath40 is the accretion rate scaled in eddington units ( @xmath192 ) , @xmath193 , and we assume that the wind is effective over the entire radial extent of the adaf out to @xmath194 , the transition radius . the efficiency of mass loss is not only determined by @xmath195 , but also by the radial extent of the adaf ( eq . [ [ eq : rmqwind ] ] ) . around a black hole , the adaf extends from the transition radius ( @xmath196 ) down to the event horizon , and so the accretion rate onto the black hole is @xmath197 . around a neutron star , however , the adaf has a minimum radius equal to the magnetospheric radius @xmath198 , so that the accretion rate at the magnetosphere is @xmath199 . if @xmath200 , as is the case for @xmath201 in quiescent ns sxts , then for a given value of @xmath195 , the presence of a magnetosphere around the ns significantly reduces the total mass loss relative to the bh case . the value of @xmath198 itself depends on the local accretion rate at the magnetosphere ( eq . [ [ eq : rmq ] ] ) . since the accretion rate at a given radius decreases with increasing @xmath195 , a larger @xmath195 implies both a larger @xmath198 and a smaller radial extent for the adaf . we solve for the magnetospheric radius by combining equations ( [ eq : rmq ] ) and ( [ eq : rmqwind ] ) and find @xmath202^{\frac{1}{7 + 2p } } , \label{eq : rmqwind2}\ ] ] where @xmath201 is expressed in schwarzschild units for a ns of 1.4 @xmath203 ( eq [ [ eq : rmqwind2 ] ] is the generalization of eq [ [ eq : rmq ] ] for non - zero @xmath195 ) . we have confirmed ( by combining eqs . [ [ eq : rmqwind ] ] and [ [ eq : rmqwind2 ] ] ) that despite the reduction of the radial extent of the adaf for larger values of @xmath195 , increasing @xmath195 leads to an effective reduction of @xmath204 for any reasonable values of @xmath195 , @xmath196 and @xmath205 . for a standard ns with low magnetic field strength ( @xmath206 , @xmath207 ) and a typical accretion rate at the outer boundary of the adaf @xmath208 ( 4.2 ; fig . [ fig : accrate ] ) , we find @xmath209 in the absence of a wind ( @xmath210 ) . for a wind with @xmath211 , @xmath212 ( `` intermediate '' wind model , @xmath213 ) , we find @xmath214 and @xmath215 , while for a wind with @xmath216 , @xmath212 ( `` strong '' wind model , @xmath217 ) , we find @xmath218 and @xmath219 . for these estimates , we have chosen @xmath220 by analogy with the values usually inferred in quiescent bh sxts ( narayan et al . 1996 ; menou et al . 1998 ) . were @xmath196 to be smaller , the overall mass loss in the wind for a given @xmath195 would be smaller . note that the adaf can not extend far beyond @xmath221 schwarzschild radii because , for a given @xmath222 , there is a maximum radius out to which the adaf can exist ( e.g. esin et al . 1997 ; menou et al . 1998 ) . following quataert & narayan ( 1998 ) , we computed two examples of adaf models assuming that the dominant effect of the wind on the structure and the emission properties of the adaf is to reduce the density in the accretion flow ; in addition , we assumed that the emission from the wind itself can be neglected relative to the emission from the accretion flow . figure [ fig : bhwind]a shows the quiescent x - ray luminosities ( 0.5 - 10 kev ) of bh sxts predicted by the adaf+wind model for which @xmath223 is equal to @xmath224 of the mass supplied by the secondary , @xmath211 , @xmath212 and @xmath225 . this model gives roughly the same x - ray luminosities as the previous no - wind adaf model ( 4.1 ) . the actual mass accreting onto the black hole is reduced here , but nevertheless the luminosities are the same because of the increase in the value of @xmath56 from @xmath226 to @xmath227 ( see quataert & narayan 1998 ) . figure [ fig : bhwind]b shows the quiescent x - ray luminosities ( 0.5 - 10 kev ) of ns sxts predicted by the same adaf+wind model , assuming that all the mass reaching the magnetosphere is accreted onto the ns surface ( i.e. no propeller effect ) . since the x - ray luminosity of the adaf is still much less than the luminosity coming from the ns surface , the main effect of including the wind is to decrease the luminosity of quiescent ns sxts in proportion to the reduction of @xmath40 at the inner edge of the adaf ( eq . [ [ eq : rmqwind ] ] ) . by comparing figures [ fig : lumbh]b and [ fig : bhwind]b , it is clear that the luminosity is smaller by roughly an order of magnitude , which is insufficient to explain the observations . thus , the intermediate wind scenario must also invoke a propeller effect , though with a somewhat lower efficiency than that described in 5 . given the uncertainties in our propeller model ( see 6.2 ) , we see no objection to such a model . only for the strongest wind models ( @xmath228 , @xmath212 ) does the luminosity difference between ns sxts and bh sxts predicted by the models reduce to the observed difference . for @xmath229 and @xmath230 ( @xmath206 , @xmath231 ) , ( [ eq : rmqwind ] ) and ( [ eq : rmqwind2 ] ) predict @xmath232 and @xmath233 , which is basically consistent with the small accretion rates required to explain the observed quiescent luminosities of ns sxts ( cf . [ fig : lumbh]b ) . but is this a reasonable model ? can the propeller effect be completely ineffective at preventing mass from reaching the ns surface ? if the neutron stars in ns sxts have spin periods of typically a few ms , as suggested by recent observations ( e.g. white & zhang 1997 ; zhang et al . 1998 ; campana et al . 1998 ; wijnands & van der klis 1998 ) , their corotation radii are a few schwarzschild radii . this is substantially smaller than the few tens of schwarzschild radii inferred for @xmath201 in 6.1 . the propeller effect is therefore expected to act quite strongly in these systems ( illarionov & sunyaev 1975 ) . note that the values of @xmath201 quoted in 6.1 , which correspond to a magnetic field strength @xmath122 of @xmath86 g , would be even larger for a larger @xmath122 ( eq . [ [ eq : rmqwind2 ] ] ) . can the propeller in such a system be so ineffective that @xmath234 ? we pointed out in 5.2 that there are large uncertainties in the values of @xmath111 , which come mainly from the strong dependence of @xmath111 on the ns rotation speed and the magnetospheric radius : @xmath235 ( the dependence on @xmath123 also affects the size of the ns emitting area , since @xmath236 ) . the latter source of uncertainty is perhaps more important , since while @xmath77 can be determined by direct observations , @xmath237 must be deduced from theoretical arguments . although the value of @xmath123 used in our work ( eq . [ [ eq : rmq ] ] ) is standard , it is based on simple dimensional arguments . given the strong dependence of @xmath111 on @xmath237 , an error , for instance , of only a factor of @xmath238 in @xmath237 translates to an error of more than an order of magnitude in @xmath111 . recent work by psaltis & chakrabarty ( 1998 ) shows that the standard scaling used for @xmath123 ( for disk - magnetosphere interactions ) is not consistent with observations in at least one weakly magnetized ns sxt ( sax j1808.4 - 3658 ) . consequently , we can not rule out the possibility that equation ( [ eq : rmq ] ) overestimates the value of @xmath123 for an adaf - magnetosphere interaction . the propeller effect would then be significantly less efficient than our previous results suggest ( 5 ) . if winds alone ( @xmath228 ) are to explain the reduced luminosity difference between bh and ns sxts in quiescence , we need a highly inefficient propeller . for example , from the no - wind ( @xmath210 ) model to the @xmath229 model described in 6.1 , @xmath201 increases by a factor @xmath239 which implies a @xmath240 times more efficient propeller according to equation ( [ eq : facc ] ) . since the @xmath210 model has a propeller with @xmath241 , the propeller would have to be @xmath242 times less efficient in the @xmath229 model than we would infer based on the theory described in 5 . in addition , in the presence of a wind , the value of @xmath111 is likely only to be smaller than the expression in equation ( [ eq : facc ] ) . this is because the wind flows out preferentially from the polar regions of the adaf ( narayan & yi 1995a ) , so there is no gas to flow down to the polar caps of the ns . even allowing for reasonable uncertainties in the scalings in equation ( [ eq : rmq ] ) , it does not seem likely that the propeller model could be that wrong . we therefore feel that the @xmath228 strong wind model is unlikely . chen et al . ( 1998 ; their fig . 3 ) argued that the segregation in luminosity swing between outburst and quiescence previously found by narayan et al . ( 1997b ) and garcia et al . ( 1998 ) disappears in a large sample . we point out in this paper that the chen et al . sample is larger only because they include numerous upper limits , many of which are based on observations with insufficient sensitivity to detect typical quiescent sxts . unless treated with care , for instance with a `` detection and bounds '' type method ( e.g. avni et al . 1980 ; schmitt 1985 ) , upper limits can obscure a true correlation , and indeed this seems to be the case with the analysis of chen et al . ( 1998 ) . our fig . [ fig : lumfirm ] shows a carefully selected and smaller sample , and we find that there is a difference of luminosity between quiescent bh and ns sxts . furthermore , we argue , based on theoretical mass transfer rates , that it is important to compare quiescent luminosities of ns sxts and bh sxts of similar orbital periods . we find that quiescent bh sxts with short orbital periods are about @xmath103 orders of magnitude fainter ( in eddington units ) than quiescent ns sxts with comparable orbital periods . the difference reduces to a little more than one order of magnitude when absolute luminosities are considered . the sample is , however , small . future observations with _ chandra x - ray observatory ( cxo ) _ and _ xmm _ will hopefully increase the sample size sufficiently to provide a more convincing case . hopefully , they will also allow separate comparisons of long and short period systems . this should help solidify the arguments advanced by narayan et al . ( 1997b ) and garcia et al . ( 1998 ) for event horizons in black holes . we find that the luminosities of quiescent ns sxts are lower than the values predicted by standard binary evolution models when combined with adaf models . following zhang et al . ( 1998 ) , we argue that the propeller effect offers a plausible explanation for the discrepancy . however , although our model for the propeller effect accounts for the luminosities and small emitting areas of quiescent ns sxts , it suffers from several sources of uncertainty that may affect the results significantly . the predictions of the model strongly depend on the spin frequency @xmath77 of the ns and therefore on the prescription chosen for the torque ( eq . [ [ eq : idealtorque ] ] ) . the magnitude of the torque is not well known , especially in the propeller regime ( e.g. davies , fabian & pringle 1979 ; henrichs 1983 ) . the results of our calculations are also sensitive to the precise values of the magnetospheric radii in quiescence and outburst and to the assumption that the fastness parameter @xmath243 . if @xmath244 , @xmath131 is reduced by a factor @xmath136 ( eq . [ [ eq : eqomega ] ] ) and more mass is accreted because @xmath111 is @xmath245 . note , however , that independently of equation [ [ eq : idealtorque ] ] and the value of @xmath136 , spin periods of a few milliseconds and low magnetic field strengths ( assuming that eq . [ [ eq : rmq ] ] is correct ) lead to predictions for luminosities and surface areas that are consistent with observations . even if the spin periods of neutron stars in ns sxts are known , the predictions of our propeller model are still somewhat uncertain because of the strong dependence of the fractions @xmath111 and @xmath68 on the magnetospheric radius in quiescence @xmath237 . if the standard expression ( eq . [ [ eq : rmq ] ] ) overestimates the value of @xmath123 , then the propeller effect could be less efficient than indicated by our results in 5 . in that case , winds from adafs could provide the additional mechanism required to explain the low quiescent luminosities of ns sxts . we have also neglected the likely misalignment between the neutron star spin axis and magnetic axis and have assumed a dipolar structure for the magnetic field . relaxing these assumptions could also modify our results , especially our estimates of the fractions @xmath111 and @xmath68 . the system exo 0748 - 676 appears unusually bright in our sample of quiescent ns sxts . one possible explanation is that magnetic braking acts more efficiently in this system because of its rather short @xmath0 , giving a larger mass transfer rate . if the mass transfer rate is higher , the propeller effect would also be less efficient , and would increase the mass falling on the ns even further . note that exo 0748 - 676 is known to be an unusual binary system , as shown by its unexplained variations of @xmath0 ( hertz , wood & cominsky 1997 ) . another possible explanation is that , for some reason ( youth ? ) , this particular system has not yet reached equilibrium and spins at a relatively slower rate than other ns sxts . this would result in a less efficient propeller and a more luminous system in quiescence . this last point is a general prediction of our propeller model : the propeller effect is less efficient if the ns in a sxt spins slowly ( @xmath246 a few ms ) . it is possible that several such ns sxts with slowly spinning nss exist in our galaxy . in these ns sxts , most of the mass accreted via the adaf would reach the ns in quiescence . the outbursts of these systems would therefore be of small amplitude , 2 - 3 orders of magnitude in x - rays rather than 5 - 6 orders of magnitude , because of their relatively high quiescent luminosities . in our model , the gas which is stopped by the propeller is neglected and its fate is left unspecified . this gas could affect both the dynamics and the emission properties of the accretion flow . for instance , it is unclear how the mass accreted via the adaf will find its way out of the quasi - spherical accretion flow after being propelled outward . in 6 , we considered adaf models with winds assuming that the efficiency @xmath195 of the wind is the same for bh and ns sxts . in principle , @xmath195 could be different for adafs around bhs and around nss ( because of the presence of the magnetosphere in nss for instance ) . having a different value of @xmath195 for bh and ns sxts would not , however , affect our conclusion that winds alone probably can not explain the observed quiescent luminosities of ns sxts . recently , brown et al . ( 1998 ) argued that nuclear reactions in the crust of neutron stars , triggered during outbursts in ns sxts , could efficiently heat up the ns cores in these systems . the energy deposited during an outburst would be reemitted during quiescence at a rate sufficient to explain the observed quiescent thermal emission . if so , the propeller effect must be even more efficient than our estimates in 5 indicate , so that accretion in quiescence does not contribute much to the quiescent emission of ns sxts . we note two criteria that bear on the relative importance of crustal heating and accretion to the quiescent luminosity of ns sxts . first , in the scenario of brown et al . , the entire surface of the ns contributes to the quiescent emission . small emitting areas have usually been inferred from the observations , by assuming that the quiescent emission is close to blackbody emission . however , rutledge et al . ( 1998 ) have shown that much larger areas are inferred if detailed hydrogen atmosphere models are used instead of idealized blackbody models . there is a large uncertainty in these results because of the poorly known hydrogen column density to the systems . nevertheless , the values of the emitting areas inferred by rutledge et al for several systems are consistent with the entire ns surface being responsible for the emission in quiescence . this success favors the crustal heating model . on the other hand , any observed rapid variability ( e.g. on timescales of a few days ) should be considered as strong evidence of the importance of accretion in quiescence , because the intrinsic thermal emission from the ns is not expected to vary on such small timescales ( brown et al . campana et al . ( 1997 ) reported that the quiescent x - ray luminosity of the prototypical ns sxt cen x-4 varied by a factor of @xmath71 over a period of @xmath247 days.this establishes that the accretion luminosity can be more than 3 times larger than any steady quiescent luminosity possibly present in this system . though very little x - ray variability data are presently available , several studies of the optical counterpart of cen x-4 in quiescence have shown a variability of order several tenths of a magnitude ( e.g. cowley et al . 1988 ; chevalier et al . 1989 ; mcclintock & remillard 1990 ) . since it is natural to relate this optical variability to the x - ray variability observed by campana et al . ( 1997 ) , both sets of observations appear consistent with accretion being the dominant mechanism for the quiescent luminosity of ns sxts . throughout this study , we assumed that accretion is responsible for the quiescent emission of both ns and bh sxts . the possibility that this emission could be due to two different processes in ns sxts certainly complicates the comparisons between the two classes of systems . we note , however , that even if the dominant contribution to the quiescent emission of ns sxts is crustal heating , the reason why quiescent ns sxts , as a class , are brighter than quiescent bh sxts remains the presence of a hard surface in ns sxts and of an event horizon in bh sxts . in this paper , we have reconsidered the luminosity difference between black hole and neutron star soft x - ray transients in quiescence , which has been used to argue for the presence of event horizons in black holes . we show that the current observational data suggest that quiescent bh sxts as a class are fainter than ns sxts . this result agrees with the previous work of narayan et al . ( 1997b ) and garcia et al . ( 1998 ) , but it disagrees with the conclusions of chen et al . ( 1998 ) who used an inappropriate sample of sxts for their comparison . we point out that , for a reliable comparison of the two classes of sxts , objects with similar orbital periods @xmath0 should be compared . otherwise , variations of the mass transfer rate @xmath37 with @xmath0 can mask the results . we find that the observed luminosities of quiescent bh sxts are consistent with the predictions of binary evolution models for @xmath248 if roughly a third of the mass supplied by the secondary is accreted by the black hole via an adaf . this estimate is for @xmath49 . the fraction goes down to @xmath249 and @xmath250 for @xmath251 and @xmath252 respectively . the observed luminosities of quiescent ns sxts suggest , on the other hand , that only a very small fraction of the mass transferred by the secondary reaches the neutron star surface . we explain the small fraction in ns sxts by invoking an efficient propeller . we have constructed a model for the propeller effect that accounts for the observed luminosities of quiescent ns sxts and their small emitting areas . in addition , the model appears to be consistent with the millisecond spin periods recently inferred from observations of accreting neutron stars in transient low mass binary systems ( aql x-1 , sax j1808.4 - 3658 ) . winds from adafs constitute an alternative explanation ( bb98 ) for the very small fraction of mass reaching the neutron star surface in quiescence . we argue that an adaf model with strong winds and no propeller can not explain the observed luminosities . however , an adaf model with a wind of low or intermediate strength and a somewhat less efficient propeller ( but still within the range of uncertainties of our propeller model ) is consistent with the observed quiescent luminosities of bh and ns sxts . in this case , the parameter @xmath56 , which measures the fraction of the viscous energy that goes directly into the electrons , has to be large @xmath253 ( quataert & narayan 1998 ) . after submitting our paper for publication , we became aware of an independent paper by asai et al . ( 1998 ) on the same subject . the conclusions of asai et al . are very similar to those presented here : ( 1 ) observational data show evidence for a difference of x - ray luminosity between quiescent bh and ns sxts , ( 2 ) only @xmath254 of the mass transferred by the secondary reaches the ns surface in quiescent ns sxts , and ( 3 ) this small accreted fraction could be due to the propeller effect in ns sxts . the quiescent fluxes and upper limits reported herein are generally in very good agreement with those listed in asai et al . ( 1998 ) , with the exception of 4u1543 - 47 . here we assume a distance of 8 kpc , while asai et al . assume 1 kpc . this accounts for most , but not all of the discrepancy between the asai et al . upper limit and that in orosz et al . we choose to use the latter limit , as it is more conservative . we are grateful to josh grindlay , mario livio , philip podsiadlowski , dimitrios psaltis and eliot quataert for useful discussions , and an anonymous referee for constructive comments . ae and rn also gratefully acknowledge their conversation with shuang - nan zhang who suggested the idea of a propeller effect in the context of a quasispherical accretion flow . this work was supported in part by nasa grant nag 5 - 2837 . km was supported by a smithsonian astrophysical observatory ( sao ) predoctoral fellowship and a french higher education ministry grant . ae was supported by a national science foundation graduate research fellowship and by nasa through axaf fellowship grant pf8 - 10002 awarded by the axaf science center , which is operated by the sao for nasa under contract nas8 - 39073 . abramowicz , m. , chen , x .- m . , granath , m. & lasota , j .- 1996 , apj , 471 , 762 . abramowicz , m. , chen , x .- m . , kato , s. , lasota , j .- p . , & regev , o. 1995 , apj lett . , 438 , l37 . asai , k. et al . 1998 , pasj , 50 , 611 . avni , y. , soltan , a. , tananbaum , h. & zamorani , g. 1980 , apj , 238 , 800 . bailyn , c.d . , jain , r.k . , coppi , p. & orosz , j.a . , 1998 . , apj , 499 , 367 . beekman , g. , et al . , 1997 , mnras , 290 , 303 . bisnovatyi - kogan , g.s . & lovelace , r.v.e . , 1997 , apj lett . , 486 , l43 . blandford , r.d . & begelman , m.c . , 1998 , mnras , submitted , astro - ph/9809083 ( bb98 ) . bondi , h. , 1952 , mnras , 112 , 195 . brown , e.f . , bildsten , l. & rutledge , r.e . , 1998 , apj lett . , 504 , l95 . campana , s. , mereghetti , s. , stella , l. & colpi , m. , 1997 , a&a , 324 , 941 . campana , s. et al . , 1998 , apj lett . , 499 , l65 . cannizzo , j.k . 1993 , in accretion disks in compact stellar systems , ed . wheeler ( singapore : world scientific ) , p. 6 . chen , w. , shrader , c.r . & livio , m. , 1997 , apj , 491 , 312 . chakrabarty , d. & morgan , e.h . , 1998 , nature , 394 , 346 ( cm98 ) . chen , w. et al . , 1998 , in accretion processes in astrophysics - some like it hot , eds . s. holt & t. kallman ( woodbury , ny : aip ) , p. 347 . chen , x.m . , abramowicz , m.a . & lasota , j .- , 1997 , apj , 476 , 61 chevalier , c. , ilovaisky , s.a . , van paradijs , j. , pedersen , h. & van der klis , m. , 1989 , a&a , 210 , 114 . cowley , a.p . et al . , 1988 , aj , 95 , 1231 . cui , w. , 1997 , apj lett . , 482 , l163 . cui , w. , barret , d. , zhang , s.n . , chen , w. , boirin , l. & swank , j. , 1998 , apj lett . , 502 , l49 . daumerie , p.r . , 1996 , ph . d. thesis , univers . illinois at urbana - champaign . davies , r. e. , fabian , a. c. & pringle , j. e. , 1979 , , 186 , 779 . davies , r. e. & pringle , j. e. , 1981 , , 196 , 209 . esin , a.a . , mcclintock , j.e . , & narayan , r. , 1997 , apj , 489 , 865 . esin , a.a . , narayan , r. , cui , w. , grove , j.e . & zhang , s .- n . , 1998 , apj , in press , astro - ph/9711167 . frank , j. , king , a. & raine , d. , 1992 , accretion power in astrophysics ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) . garcia , m.r . , mcclintock , j.e . , narayan , r. , & callanan , j. , 1998 , in the procceedings of the 13th naw on cvs , jackson hole , wy , eds . s. howell , e. kuulkers , and c. woodward , p. 506 , astro - ph/9708149 . ghosh , r. & lamb , f. k. , 1979 , , 234 , 296 . gruzinov , a. , 1998 , apj , 501 , 787 . hameury , j .- m . , lasota , j .- p . , mcclintock , j.e . , & narayan , r. , 1997 , apj , 489 , 234 . henrichs , h.f . 1983 , in accretion driven stellar x - ray sources , eds . lewin & e.p.j . van den heuvel ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) , p. 393 . hertz , p. , wood , k.s . & cominsky , l.r . , 1997 , apj , 486 , 1000 . ichimaru , s. , 1977 , apj , 214 , 840 . illarionov , a. f. & sunyaev , r. a. , 1975 , a&a , 39 , 185 . kalogera , v. , kolb , u. & king , a. , 1998 , apj , in press , astro - ph/9803288 . king , a. , 1988 , quat . soc . , 29 , 1 . king , a. , kolb , u. & burderi , l. , 1996 , apj lett . , 464 , l127 . kolb , u. , 1998 , mnras , 297 , 419 . kuulkers , e. , 1998 , new astron . , in press , astro - ph/9805031 . lasota , j .- 1996 , in compact stars in binaries ; iau symposium 165 , eds . j. van paradijs e.p.j . van den heuvel & e. kuulkers , ( dordrecht : kluwer ) , p. 43 . lasota , j .- p . & hameury , j .- m . , 1998 , in accretion processes in astrophysics - some like it hot , eds . s. holt & t. kallman ( woodbury , ny : aip ) , p. 351 . lasota , j .- p . , narayan , r. & yi , i. , 1996 , a&a , 314 , 813 . lewin , w.h.g . , van paradijs , j. & taam , r.e . , 1993 , space sci . , 62 , 223 . mcclintock , j.e . , 1998 , in accretion processes in astrophysics - some like it hot , eds . s. holt & t. kallman ( woodbury , ny : aip ) , p. 290 . mcclintock , j.e . & remillard , r.a . , 1990 , apj , 350 , 386 . menou , k. , narayan , r. & lasota , j .- p . , 1998 , apj , in press . meyer , f. & meyer - hofmeister , e. , 1994 , a&a , 288 , 175 . nakamura , k.e . , kusunose , m. , matsumoto , r. & kato , s. , 1997 , pasj , 49 , 503 . narayan , r. , barret , d. , & mcclintock , j.e . , 1997a , apj , 482 , 448 . narayan , r. , garcia , m.r . & mcclintock , j.e . , 1997b , , 478 , l79 . narayan , r. , kato , s. & honma , 1997 , apj , 476 , 49 . narayan , r. , mahadevan , r. , grindlay , j.e . , popham , r.g . & gammie , c.f . , 1998a , apj , 492 , 554 . narayan , r. , mahadevan , r. & quataert , e. , 1998b , in the theory of black hole accretion discs , eds . m. a. abramowicz , g. bjornsson , and j. e. pringle ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) , astro - ph/9803141 . narayan , r. , mcclintock , j.e . & yi , i. , 1996 , apj , 457 , 821 . narayan , r. & yi , i. , 1994 , apj lett . , 428 , l13 . narayan , r. & yi , i. , 1995a , apj , 444 , 231 . narayan , r. & yi , i. , 1995b , apj , 452 , 710 . orosz , j.a . & bailyn , c.d . , 1997 , apj , 477 , 876 . orosz , j.a . , jain , r.k . , bailyn , c.d . , mcclintock , j.e . & remillard , r.a . , 1998 , apj , 499 , 375 . phillips , s.n . , shahbaz , t. & podsiadlowski , p. 1999 , mnras , in press , astro - ph/9811474 . popham , r.g . & gammie , c.f . , 1998 , apj , in press , astro - ph/9802321 . pylyser , e. & savonije , g.j . , 1988 , a&a , 191 , 57 . quataert , e. , apj , 500 , 978 . quataert , e. & gruzinov , a. , 1998 , apj submitted , astro - ph/9803112 . quataert , e. & narayan , r. , 1998 , apj , in press . rajagopal , m. & romani , r.w . , 1996 , apj , 461 , 327 . ritter , h. & kolb , u. , 1998 , a&as , in press . rutledge , r.e . , bildsten , l. , brown , e.f . , pavlov , g.g . & zavlin , v.e . , 1998 , apj , in press . schmitt , j.h.m . , 1985 , apj , 293 , 178 . shapiro , s.l . & salpeter , e.e . , 1975 , apj , 198 , 671 . shaviv g. , wehrse r. , 1986 , a&a lett . , 159 , l5 . stella , l. , campana , s. , colpi , m. , mereghetti , s. & tavani , m. , 1994 , apj lett . , 423 , l47 . stella , l. , white , n.e . , rosner , r. , 1986 , apj , 308 , 669 . tanaka , y. & lewin w.h.g . , 1995 , in x - ray binaries , eds . lewin , j. van paradijs & e.p.j . van den heuvel , ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) , p. 126 . tanaka , y. & shibazaki , n. , 1996 , ara&a , 34 , 607 . turolla , r. , zampieri , l. , colpi , m. & treves , a. 1994 , apj lett . , 426 , l35 . van paradijs , j. , 1995 , in x - ray binaries , eds . lewin , j. van paradijs & e.p.j . van den heuvel , ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) , p. 536 . van paradijs , j. & mcclintock , j.e . , 1995 , in x - ray binaries , eds . lewin , j. van paradijs & e.p.j . van den heuvel , ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) , p. 58 . verbunt , f. , belloni , t. , johnston , h.m . , van der klis , m. & lewin , w.h.g . , 1994 , a&a , 285 , 903 . verbunt , f. & van den heuvel , e.p.j . , 1995 , in x - ray binaries , eds . lewin , j. van paradijs & e.p.j . van den heuvel , ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) , p. 457 . wang , y .- m . , 1987 , a&a , 183 , 257 . wang , y .- m . , 1995 , apj lett . , 449 , l153 . wang , y .- m . & robertson , j. a. , 1985 , a&a , 151 , 361 . warner , b. , 1995 , cataclysmic variable stars , ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) . webbink , r.f . , rappaport , s. & savonije , g.j . , 1983 , apj , 270 , 678 . white , n.e . , nagase , f. & parmar , a.n . , 1995 , in x - ray binaries , eds . lewin , j. van paradijs & e.p.j . van den heuvel , ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) , p. 1 . white , n.e . & zhang , w. , 1997 , apj lett . , 490 , l87 . wijnands , r. & van der klis , m. , 1998 , nature , 394 , 344 . zavlin , v.e . , pavlov , g.g . & shibanov , y.a . , 1996 , a&a , 331 , 821 . zhang , s.n . , yu , w. & zhang , w. , 1998 , apj lett . , 494 , l71 . lcccc + system & @xmath0 ( hr ) & d ( kpc ) & @xmath255~({\rm erg~s^{-1}})$ ] & @xmath256 + + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) + + + @xmath257 exo 0748 - 676 & @xmath258 & @xmath259 & @xmath260 & @xmath261 + @xmath257 4u 2129 + 47 & @xmath262 & @xmath263 & @xmath264&@xmath261 + @xmath257 1456 - 32 ( cen x-4 ) & @xmath265 & @xmath266 & @xmath267&@xmath261 + @xmath257 1908 + 005 ( aql x-1 ) & @xmath268 & @xmath269 & @xmath270 & @xmath261 + @xmath257 h1608 - 52 & @xmath271 or @xmath272 & @xmath273 & @xmath274&@xmath261 + + + @xmath275 gro j0422 + 32 ( xn per 92 ) & @xmath276 & @xmath277 & @xmath278&@xmath279 + @xmath275 a0620 - 00 ( xn mon 75 ) & @xmath280 & @xmath281 & @xmath282 & @xmath283 + @xmath275 gs2000 + 25 ( xn vul 88 ) & @xmath284 & @xmath285 & @xmath286 & @xmath287 + @xmath275 gs1124 - 683 ( xn mus 91 ) & @xmath288 & @xmath289 & @xmath290&@xmath291 + @xmath275 h1705 - 250 ( xn oph 77 ) & @xmath292 & @xmath293 & @xmath294 & @xmath295 + @xmath275 4u 1543 - 47 & @xmath296 & @xmath297 & @xmath298 & @xmath299 + @xmath275 j1655 - 40 ( xn sco 94 ) & @xmath300 & @xmath301 & @xmath267 & @xmath302 + @xmath275 gs2023 + 338 ( v404 cyg ) & @xmath303 & @xmath304 & @xmath305 & @xmath306 + + note . ( 1 ) @xmath257 indicates a ns primary and @xmath275 a bh primary . ( 2 ) orbital periods from mcclintock ( 1998 ) , except where indicated . distances to the systems . ( 4 ) luminosities in quiescence in the 0.5 - 10 kev band ( corrected for the revised distances ) from narayan et al . ( 1997b ) and garcia et al . ( 1998 ) , except where indicated . quiescent luminosities for 4u1543 - 47 and gro j1655 - 40 are based on 20.4 ks and 100 ks asca observations ( respectively ) , and the quiescent luminosity for gro j0422 + 32 is based on a 19 ks rosat observation . ( 5 ) primary masses . ( a ) van paradijs ( 1995 ) . ( b ) simbad cds catalog . ( c ) ritter & kolb ( 1998 ) . ( d ) chen et al . ( e ) garcia et al . ( g ) esin et al . ( h ) narayan et al . ( 1997b ) . ( i ) esin et al . ( j ) hameury et al . ( k ) beekman et al . ( l ) chen et al . ( m ) this is an arbitrary choice in the range @xmath307 given by orosz et al . ( 1998 ; see also bailyn et al . ( n ) orosz et al . ( @xmath308 ) for simplicity , all ns masses are assumed to be @xmath309 . Abstract:
[ "we consider the x - ray luminosity difference between neutron star and black hole soft x - ray transients ( ns and bh sxts ) in quiescence . the current observational data suggest that bh sxts are significantly fainter than ns sxts . the luminosities of quiescent bh sxts are consistent with the predictions of binary evolution models for the mass transfer rate if ( 1 ) accretion occurs via an adaf in these systems and ( 2 ) the accreting compact objects have event horizons . the luminosities of quiescent ns sxts are not consistent with the predictions of adaf models when combined with binary evolution models , unless most of the mass accreted in the adaf is prevented from reaching the neutron star surface . we consider the possibility that mass accretion is reduced in quiescent ns sxts because of an efficient propeller and develop a model of the propeller effect that accounts for the observed luminosities . we argue that modest winds from adafs are consistent with the observations , while strong winds are probably not . # 1to 0pt#1" ]
16,733
16,733
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: we choose as the starting point of the present work the fundamental problem of channel simulation . roughly speaking , this problem asks when a communication channel @xmath1 from alice ( a ) to bob ( b ) can be used to simulate another channel @xmath2 , also from a to b ? @xcite this problem has many variants according to the resources available to a and b. in particular , the case when a and b can access unlimited amount of shared entanglement has been completely solved . let @xmath3 denote the entanglement - assisted classical capacity of @xmath1 @xcite . it was shown that , in the asymptotic setting , to optimally simulate @xmath2 , we need to apply @xmath1 at rate @xmath4 @xcite . in other words , the entanglement - assisted classical capacity uniquely determines the properties of the channel in the simulation process . furthermore , even with stronger resources such as no - signalling correlations or feedback , this rate can not be improved otherwise we would violate causality , see @xcite for a discussion . here we are interested in the zero - error setting @xcite . it is well known that the zero - error communication problem is extremely difficult , already for classical channels . indeed , the single - shot zero - error classical communication capability of a classical noisy channel equals the independence number of the ( classical ) confusability graph induced by the channel , and the latter problem is well - known to be np - complete . the behaviour of quantum channels in zero - error communication is even more complex as striking effects such as super - activation are possible @xcite . the most general zero - error simulation problem remains wide open . to overcome this difficulty , many variants of this problem have been proposed . the most natural way is to introduce some additional resources and see how this changes the capacity . indeed , extra resources such as classical feedback @xcite , entanglement @xcite , and even a small ( constant ) amount of forward communication @xcite , have been introduced . it has been shown these extra resources can increase the capacity , and generally simplify the problem . in particular , it was shown that even for classical communication channel , shared entanglement can strictly increase the asymptotic zero - error classical capacity @xcite . however , determining the entanglement - assisted zero - error classical capacity remains an open problem even for classical channels . more powerful resources are actually required in order to simplify the problem . @xcite introduced classical no - signalling correlations into the zero - error communication for classical channels , and showed that the well - known fractional packing number of the bipartite graph induced by the channel , gives precisely the zero - error classical capacity of the channel . previously , it was known by shannon that this fractional packing number corresponds to the zero - error classical capacity of the channel when assisted with a feedback link from the receiver to the sender and when the unassisted zero - error classical capacity is not vanishing @xcite . for general background on graph theory see @xcite , and for `` fractional graph theory '' the delightful book @xcite . another major motivation for this work is to further explore the connection between quantum information theory and the so - called `` non - commutative graph theory '' suggested in @xcite . such a connection has been well - known in classical information theory . in @xcite , shannon realized that the zero - error capacity of a classical noisy channel only depends on the confusability graph induced by the channel . he further pointed out that in the presence of classical feedback , the zero - error capacity is completely determined by the bipartite graph of possible input - output transitions associated with the channel . thus it makes sense to talk about the zero - error capacity of a ( bipartite ) graph . the notion of non - commutative graph naturally occurs when we use quantum channels for zero - error communication . for any quantum channel , the non - commutative graph associated with the channel captures the zero - error communication properties , thus playing a similar role to confusability graph . most notably , this notion also makes it possible to introduce a quantum lovsz @xmath0 function to upper bound the entanglement - assisted zero - error capacity that has properties quite similar to its classical analogue @xcite . very recently , it was shown that the zero - error classical capacity of a quantum channel in the presence of quantum feedback only depends on the kraus operator space of the channel @xcite . in other words , the kraus operator space plays a role that is quite similar to the bipartite graph . now it becomes clear that any classical channel induces a bipartite graph as well as a confusability graph , while a quantum channel induces a non - commutative bipartite graph and a non - commutative graph . the new insight is that we can simply regard a non - commutative ( bipartite ) graph as a high - level abstraction of all underlying quantum channels , and study its information - theoretic properties , not limited to zero - error setting . this leads us to a very general viewpoint : graphs as communication channels . for instance , we can define the entanglement - assisted classical capacity of a non - commutative bipartite graph as the minimum of the entanglement - assisted classical capacity of quantum channels that induce the given kraus operator space . it was shown that this quantity enjoys a number of interesting properties including additivity under tensor product and an operational interpretation as a sort of entanglement - assisted conclusive capacity of the bipartite graph @xcite . it remains a great challenge to find tractable forms of various capacities for non - commutative ( bipartite ) graphs . in this paper we consider a more general class of quantum no - signalling correlations described by two - input and two - output quantum channels with the no - signalling constraints . this kind of correlations naturally arises in the study of the relativistic causality of quantum operations @xcite ; see also the more recent @xcite . distinguishability of these correlations from an information theoretic viewpoint has also been studied @xcite . we provide a number of new properties of these correlations , and establish several structural theorems of these correlations . then we generalize the approach of @xcite to study the zero - error classical capacity of a noisy quantum channel assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations , and the reverse problem of perfect simulation . we show that both problems can be completely solved in the one - shot scenario , revealing some nice structure : 1 . the answers are given by semidefinite programmes ( sdps , cf . @xcite ) ; 2 . at the same time they generalize the results of cubitt _ et al . _ @xcite ; 3 . for the simulation , the question is really how to form a constant channel by a convex combination of the one we want to simulate and an arbitrary other quantum channel , and the number of bits needed is just @xmath5 , where @xmath6 is the probability weight of the target channel in the convex combination ( throughout this paper , @xmath7 denotes the binary logarithm ) ; 4 . for assisted communication , there is an analogous problem of convex - combing a certain channel from b to a which has some kind of orthogonality relation with the given channel from a to b , with another one to form a constant channel . if the target channel has weight @xmath6 , then the number of bits sent is again @xmath5 . most interestingly , the solution to the communication problem only depends on the kraus operator space of the channel , not directly on the channel itself . for the simulation problem , the solution is given by the conditional min - entropy @xcite of the channel s choi - jamiokowski matrix , and is actually additive , thus also gives the asymptotic cost of simulating the channel . if we are interested in simulating the cheapest channel contained in the kraus operator space , we obtain an sdp in terms of the projection of the choi - jamiokowski matrix . both the capacity and the simulation sdps are in general not known to be multiplicative under the tensor product of channels , thus we do not know the optimal asymptotic simulation cost . we then focus on the asymptotic zero - error classical capacity and simulation cost assisted with quantum no - signalling correlations . this requires determining the asymptotic behaviour of a sequence of sdps . in general the one - shot solution does not give the asymptotic result , since the corresponding sdp is not multiplicative with respect to the tensor product of channels . a simple formula for the asymptotic channel capacity remains unknown . however , for the special cases of classical - quantum ( cq ) channels , we find that the zero - error capacity is given by the solution of a rather simple sdp suggested earlier by harrow as a natural generalization of the classical fractional packing number @xcite , which we call _ semidefinite packing number_. this result has two interesting corollaries . first , it implies that the zero - error classical capacity of cq - channels assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations is additive . second , and more importantly , we show that for a classical graph @xmath8 , the celebrated lovsz number @xmath9 @xcite , is actually the minimum zero - error classical capacity of any cq - channel that has the given graph as its confusability graph . in other words , lovsz @xmath0 function is the zero - error classical capacity of a graph assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations . to the best of our knowledge , this is the first information theoretic operational interpretation of the lovsz number since its introduction in 1979 . previously , it was known that it is an upper bound on the entanglement - assisted zero - error classical capacity of a graph @xcite . it remains unknown whether the use of quantum no - signalling correlations could be replaced by shared entanglement . the asymptotic simulation cost for kraus operator spaces associated with cq - channels is rather simpler , and is actually given by the one - shot simulation cost . before we proceed to the technical details , it may be helpful to present an overview of our main results . let @xmath1 be a quantum channel from @xmath10 to @xmath11 , with a kraus operator sum representation @xmath12 where @xmath13 . let @xmath14 denote the kraus operator space of @xmath1 . the choi - jamiokowski matrix of @xmath1 is given by @xmath15 , where @xmath16 and @xmath17 are isomorphic hilbert spaces , @xmath18 ( @xmath19 ) is orthonormal basis over @xmath16 ( @xmath17 , resp . ) , and @xmath20 is the unnormalized maximally entangled state over @xmath21 . recall that @xmath22 . let @xmath23 denote the projection onto the support of @xmath24 , which is the subspace @xmath25 , sometimes called the choi - jamiokowski support of @xmath26 ( or of the channel ) . it is worth noting that many results below can be defined on any matrix subspace @xmath26 , not just those corresponding to a quantum channel @xmath1 . however , we have to make sure that @xmath26 is actually corresponding to some quantum channel @xmath1 . this puts an additional constraint on @xmath26 . more precisely , suppose @xmath27 for some orthonormal basis @xmath28 such that @xmath29 . then we should be able to find a quantum channel @xmath30 such that @xmath31 , for some invertible matrix @xmath32 $ ] and @xmath33 . this is equivalent to @xmath34 if such a positive definite matrix @xmath35 $ ] can not be found , @xmath26 will not correspond to a quantum channel ( nor any @xmath36 for @xmath37 ) . in this case one might still be able to find @xmath38 that is a kraus operator space for some quantum channel @xmath39 . for instance , @xmath40 , and @xmath41 . ( note however that @xmath26 is the limit of the kraus subspaces of genuine quantum channels , namely amplitude damping channels with damping parameter going to @xmath42 ; hence it might still be considered as admissible kraus space of an infinitesimally amplitude damping channel . ) we will , therefore , always assume that @xmath26 corresponds to some quantum channel @xmath1 such that @xmath43 . from now on , any such kraus operator space @xmath26 will be alternatively called `` non - commutative bipartite graph '' in fact , below we shall argue why it is a natural generalization of bipartite graphs . [ capacity-1-shot ] the one - shot zero - error classical capability , ( quantified as the largest number of messages ) , of @xmath1 assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations depends only on the non - commutative graph @xmath26 , and is given by the integer part of the following sdp : @xmath44 where @xmath23 denotes the projection onto the the subspace @xmath45 . + hence we are motivated to call @xmath46 the _ no - signalling assisted independence number of @xmath26 . _ the proof of this theorem will be given in section [ subsec:1-shot - capacity ] , where we also explore other properties of the above sdp . for another direction of investigation , looking at the specific channel @xmath1 with choi - jamiokowski matrix @xmath47 and trying to minimize the error probability for given number of messages , we refer the reader to the recent and highly relevant work of leung and matthews @xcite , where exactly this is done in an environment with free no - signalling resources subject to other semidefinite constraints . it is evident from this theorem that the one - shot zero - error classical capacity of @xmath1 only depends on the kraus operator space @xmath26 . that is , any two quantum channels @xmath1 and @xmath2 will have the same capacity if they have the same kraus operator space . for this reason , we usually use @xmath46 to denote @xmath48 . furthermore , we can talk about the capacity of the kraus operator space @xmath26 directly without referring to the underling quantum channel . notice that a classical channel @xmath49 naturally induces a bipartite graph @xmath50 , where the input and output alphabets @xmath51 and @xmath52 are the two sets of vertices , and @xmath53 is the set of edges such that @xmath54 if and only if @xmath55 . we shall also use the notation @xmath56 if @xmath54 , and @xmath57 otherwise . in this case , we have @xmath58 and our notion @xmath59 generalizes this to arbitrary quantum channels . similarly , the simulation cost is given as follows . [ review - simulation-1-shot ] the one - shot zero - error classical simulation cost ( quantified as the minimum number of messages ) of a quantum channel @xmath1 under quantum no - signalling assistance is given by @xmath60 . here , @xmath61 is the choi - jamiokowski matrix of @xmath1 , and @xmath62 is the conditional min - entropy defined as follows @xcite : @xmath63 for example , the asymptotic zero - error classical simulation cost of the cq - channel @xmath64 and @xmath65 , is given by @xmath66 where @xmath67 is the trace distance between @xmath68 and @xmath69 . this gives a new operational interpretation of the trace distance between @xmath68 and @xmath69 as the asymptotic exact simulation cost for the above cq - channel . since there might be more than one channel with kraus operator space included in @xmath26 , we are interested in the exact simulation cost of the `` cheapest '' among these channels . more precisely , the one - shot zero - error classical simulation cost of a kraus operator space @xmath26 is defined as @xmath70 where @xmath71 means that @xmath59 is a subspace of @xmath26 . then it follows immediately from theorem [ review - simulation-1-shot ] that [ thm : l-1-shot - cost ] the one - shot zero - error classical simulation cost of a kraus operator space @xmath26 under quantum no - signalling assistance is given by the integer ceiling of @xmath72 where @xmath23 is the projection onto the choi - jamiokowski support of @xmath26 . we will prove these two theorems in section [ subsec:1-shot - cost ] . we introduce the asymptotic zero - error channel capacity of @xmath26 by considering the number of bits that can be communicated over @xmath73 copies of the channel @xmath1 , i.e. @xmath74 , having kraus operator space @xmath36 , per channel use as @xmath75 ; we denote it as @xmath76 . likewise , the asymptotic number of bits needed per channel use to simulate @xmath74 as @xmath75 , denoted @xmath77 , and the same minimized over all channels with kraus operator space @xmath36 ( not necessarily product channels ! ) , which we denote @xmath78 . from these definitions , it is clear that they are given by the regularizations of the respective one - shot quantities : @xmath79 the first one because @xmath80 is additive under tensor products . so far , we are unable to determine closed formulas for the latter two in general . interestingly , the special case of @xmath26 coming from a cq - channel can be solved completely . note that if @xmath26 corresponds to a cq - channel @xmath81 , with @xmath82 the projection over the support of @xmath83 , then @xmath26 can be uniquely identified by a set of projections @xmath84 ( up to a permutation over inputs ) . in this case , @xmath85 any such kraus operator space will be called `` non - commutative bipartite cq - graph '' or simply `` cq - graph '' . the case of assisted communication seems very complicated , and most interesting . we show that the zero - error classical capacity of cq - graphs is given by the solution of the following sdp : @xmath86 this number was suggested by harrow as a natural generalization of the shannon s classical fractional packing number @xcite , and we will refer to it as _ semidefinite ( fractional ) packing number _ associated with a set of projections @xmath84 . our result can be summarized as [ thm : cq - capacity ] the zero - error classical capacity of a cq - channel @xmath87 assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations is given by the logarithm of the semidefinite packing number @xmath88 , i.e. , @xmath89 to be precise , @xmath90 the proof of this theorem is given in section [ subsec : asymptotic - capacity - cq ] . the asymptotic zero - error classical simulation cost for cq - graphs @xmath26 is relatively easy and straightforward . indeed , we show that the one - shot zero - error classical simulation cost for cq - channels is multiplicative , _ i.e. _ @xmath91 for cq - graphs @xmath92 and @xmath93 . the equality is proved by simply combining the sub - multiplicativity of the primal sdp and the super - multiplicativity of the dual problem , and then applying strong duality of sdps . it readily follows that the asymptotic simulation cost for any kraus operator @xmath26 corresponding to a cq - channel is given by the one - shot simulation cost , namely @xmath94 it is worth noting that the above equality is valid for many other cases . in particular , it holds when @xmath26 corresponds to a quantum channel that is an extreme point in the set of all quantum channels . it remains unknown whether this is true for more general @xmath26 . as an unexpected byproduct of our general analysis we obtain the following . to understand it , note that any cq - channel @xmath95 naturally induces a confusability graph @xmath8 on the vertices @xmath96 , by letting @xmath97 if and only if @xmath98 , i.e. inputs @xmath96 and @xmath99 are confusable . [ thm : theta ] for any classical graph @xmath8 , the lovsz number @xmath9 @xcite is the minimum zero - error classical capacity assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations of any cq - channel that induces @xmath8 , _ i.e. _ @xmath100 where the minimization is over cq - graphs @xmath26 and @xmath101 is the non - commutative graph corresponding to @xmath8 ( see eq . ( [ sg - graph ] ) in section v ) . in particular , equality holds for any cq - channel @xmath102 such that @xmath103 is an optimal orthogonal representation for @xmath8 in the sense of lovsz original definition @xcite . the above result gives the first clear information theoretic interpretion of the lovsz @xmath0 function of a graph @xmath8 , as the zero - error classical capacity of @xmath8 assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations , in the sense of taking the worst cq - channel with confusability graph @xmath8 . its proof will be given in section [ sec : theta ] . in section [ sec : feasibility ] , we provide results which completely characterize the feasibility ( i.e. , positivity ) of zero - error communication with a non - commutative bipartite graph , or a quantum channel , assisted by no - signalling correlations . finally , in section [ sec : conclusion ] , we conclude and propose several open problems for further study . we will provide an intuitive explanation for how the quantum no - signalling correlations naturally arise from the information - theoretic viewpoint . let @xmath2 and @xmath1 be two quantum channels both from a to b , and assume that a and b can access any quantum resources that can not be used for communicating between them directly . an interesting question is to ask when @xmath1 can exactly simulate @xmath2 ? this class of resources clearly includes shared entanglement , and actually has some other more important members that are the central interest of this paper . we will derive some general constraints that all these resources should satisfy . let us start with the one - shot case , that is , a and b can establish quantum channel @xmath2 by using all `` allowable resources '' and one use of channel @xmath1 . we can abstractly represent the whole procedure as in fig . [ fig : simulation ] ; note that it falls within the formalism of `` quantum combs '' @xcite , but as it is a rather special case we can understand it without explicitly invoking that theory . using another channel @xmath1 just once , and the correlations between a and b ; b ) . this is just an equivalent way to redraw a ) , and we have highlighted all correlations between a an b , and their pre- and/or post- processing as @xmath104.,width=415 ] here is how this simulation works . first , a performs some pre - processing on the input quantum system @xmath105 together with all possible resources at her hand , and outputs quantum system @xmath106 as the input of channel @xmath1 . the channel @xmath1 then outputs a quantum system @xmath107 . b will do some post - processing on this system together with all possible resources he has , and finally generates an output @xmath108 . if we remove @xmath1 , we are left with a network with two inputs @xmath105 and @xmath107 , and two outputs @xmath106 and @xmath108 . clearly this represents all possible pre- and/or post - processing that a and b have done and all resources that are available to a and b. in the framework of quantum mechanics , this network can be formulated as a quantum channel @xmath104 with two inputs and two outputs . thus we can redraw the simulation procedure as fig . [ fig : simulation].b . however , as @xmath1 is the only communicating device from a to b , we must have that @xmath104 can not be used to communicate from a to b. furthermore , the output @xmath106 represents the input of a to the channel @xmath1 , and thus can be uniquely determined by @xmath16 , but not @xmath107 , which is the output of @xmath1 . we will see this constraint is equivalent to b can not communicate to a using @xmath104 . these constraints have led us to a fruitful class of resources that a and b could use in communication . as before , we do nt attempt to solve the most general channel simulation problem . instead , we will focus on two simpler but most interesting cases : i ) . @xmath2 is a noiseless classical channel and @xmath1 is the given noisy channel . the optimal solution to this problem will lead us to the notion of zero - error classical capacity of @xmath1 ; ii ) . @xmath1 is a noiseless classical channel and @xmath2 is the given noisy channel . the optimal solution will lead us to the notion of zero - error classical simulation cost of @xmath2 . in the communication problem , we want to maximize the number of messages we can send exactly by the given channel ; while in the simulation problem , we want to minimize the amount of the noiseless classical communication to simulate the given channel . in the rest of this section , we will study the mathematical structures of quantum no - signalling correlations in detail . as discussed before , quantum no - signalling correlations are linear maps @xmath109 with additional constraints . first , @xmath104 is required to be completely positive ( cp ) and trace - preserving ( tp ) . this makes @xmath104 a physically realizable quantum operation . furthermore , @xmath104 is a to b no - signalling ( a@xmath110b ) . that is , a can not send classical information to b by using @xmath104 . more precisely , for any density operators @xmath111 and @xmath112 , we have @xmath113 or equivalently , @xmath114 likewise , @xmath104 is required to be b to a no - signalling ( b@xmath110a ) . that is , b can not send classical information to a by using @xmath104 . this constraint can be formulated as the following @xmath115 let the choi - jamiokowski matrix of @xmath104 be @xmath116 where @xmath117 is the identity operator over @xmath118 , @xmath119 , and @xmath120 the un - normalized maximally entangled state . we now show that all above constraints on @xmath104 can be easily reformulated into the semidefinite programming constraints in terms of the choi - jamiokowski matrix @xmath121 . for convenience , we often use unprimed letters such as @xmath105 and @xmath107 to denote the quantum systems inputting to quantum channels , and the primed letters @xmath122 and @xmath123 for the reference systems which are isomorphic to @xmath105 and @xmath107 , respectively . the constraints on @xmath104 can be equivalently formulated in terms of @xmath121 as follows : @xmath124 where @xmath51 and @xmath52 are arbitrary hermitian operators , so the transpose is not really necessary . the first two constraints guarantee that @xmath125 corresponds to a cptp map @xmath104 , while the latter two make sure that @xmath125 can not be used for communicating from a to b and b to a , respectively . both constraints need only be verified on a hermitian matrix basis of @xmath122 , @xmath123 , respectively . the key to deriving the above constraints is the following useful fact : @xmath126 where @xmath17 is an isomorphic copy of @xmath16 . it is worth noting that the class of quantum no - signalling correlations is closed under convex combinations . that is , if @xmath127 and @xmath128 are quantum no - signalling correlations and @xmath129 , then @xmath130 are also no - signalling correlations . furthermore , this class is also stable under the pre- or post - processing by a or b. that is , if @xmath104 is a no - signalling correlation from @xmath131 to @xmath132 . then @xmath133 is also no - signalling , where @xmath134 are cptp maps on suitable hilbert spaces . it is instructive to compare the quantum no - signalling correlations and the classical no - signalling correlations . recall that any classical no - signalling correlations can be described as a classical channel @xmath135 with two classical inputs @xmath136 and @xmath137 , and two classical outputs @xmath138 and @xmath139 , where @xmath140 evidently , @xmath141 can also be represented as a quantum channel in the following way @xmath142 one can easily verify the above constraints are exactly the same as treating @xmath141 a quantum no - signalling correlation . from this viewpoint , quantum no - signalling correlations are natural generalizations of their classical correspondings . finally , we would like to mention another interesting fact . that is , any two - input and two - output quantum channel @xmath104 can be reduced to a two - input and two - output classical channel @xmath141 that has the same signalling property by simply doing pre- or post - processing , and all inputs and outputs of @xmath141 are binary , i.e. , if @xmath104 is a to b ( and/or b to a ) signalling then @xmath141 is also a to b ( resp . b to a ) signalling . due to its significance , we formulate it as [ binary - signalling ] for any cptp map @xmath104 from @xmath143 to @xmath132 such that @xmath104 is b to a ( and/or a to b ) signalling , one can obtain a classical channel @xmath135 with all @xmath144 , by doing suitable local pre- and post - processing on @xmath104 , such that @xmath141 is also b to a signalling ( resp . a to b ) . assume @xmath104 is both way signalling ( the case that it is one - way signalling is similar , and in fact simpler ) . then we can find a pair of states @xmath145 and @xmath146 , such that the following two maps @xmath147 and @xmath148 are _ non - constant _ cptp maps : @xmath149 i.e. , we can find another two states @xmath150 and @xmath151 such that @xmath152 by helstrom s theorem , for any two different quantum states @xmath153 , we can find a projective measurement @xmath154 to distinguish the given states with equal prior probably with an average success probability @xmath155 as a direct consequence , the cptp map @xmath156 will produce two different classical binary probability distributions @xmath157 and @xmath158 . we will need this fact below . let @xmath159 and @xmath160 be the measurements to optimally distinguish @xmath161 and @xmath162 , respectively . then we can define four cptp maps as follows : @xmath163 using these as pre- and post - processing on @xmath104 , we obtain the desired channel @xmath164 in @xmath141 , if b inputs @xmath42 or @xmath165 , and a inputs @xmath42 , then by the above construction , a must output two binary probability distributions that are different , hence can be used for signalling from b to a. similarly , if a inputs @xmath42 or @xmath165 , and b inputs @xmath42 , then b must output another two different binary probability distributions that can be used for signalling from a to b. we will establish several structure theorems regarding quantum no - signalling correlations . note that @xmath104 is a two - input and two - output quantum channel . so there are two natural ways to think of @xmath104 according to the relation between the inputs and outputs . the first way is to partition @xmath104 as @xmath166 , so the output of @xmath105 and @xmath107 would be @xmath106 and @xmath108 , respectively ; this is perhaps the most standard way . the second way is to focus on the communication between @xmath16 and @xmath167 and partition @xmath104 as @xmath168 . in this case the output of @xmath105 and @xmath107 will be regarded as @xmath108 and @xmath106 , respectively . this kind of partition is quite useful when we are interested in the communication between @xmath16 and @xmath167 . let us start with the bipartition @xmath166 of @xmath104 . in this case , we can have a full characterization of no - signalling maps . ( bear in mind that we have assumed @xmath104 to be a cptp map in the following discussion ) . [ ns - structure1 ] let @xmath169 be a bipartite cptp map with a decomposition @xmath170 according to bipartition @xmath166 , where @xmath171 , @xmath172 , and @xmath173 are complex numbers . then we have the following : \i ) @xmath104 is b to a no - signalling iff @xmath174 can be chosen as cptp for any @xmath175 . in this case @xmath176 will be also cptp . \ii ) @xmath104 is a to b no - signalling iff @xmath177 can be chosen as cptp for any @xmath175 . in this case @xmath178 will be also cptp . \iii ) @xmath104 is no - signalling between a and b iff both @xmath177 and @xmath174 can be chosen as cptp maps , @xmath179 , and @xmath173 are real for all @xmath175 . the most interesting part is item iii ) . intuitively , any no - signalling correlation @xmath104 between a and b can be written as a real affine combination of product cptp maps @xmath180 . the proofs are relatively straightforward and we simply leave them to interested readers as exercises . now we turn to the bipartition @xmath168 of @xmath104 . we do nt have a full characterization of no - signalling correlations in this setting . nevertheless , a simple but extremely useful class of no - signalling correlations can be constructed using the following facts . [ ns - structure2 ] let @xmath169 be a bipartite cptp map with a decomposition @xmath181 according to bipartition @xmath168 , where @xmath182 , @xmath183 , and @xmath184 are complex numbers . then we have the following : \i ) if @xmath185 is a constant map and @xmath186 is tp for any @xmath175 , then @xmath104 is a to b no - signalling . \ii ) if @xmath187 is a constant map and @xmath188 is tp for any @xmath175 , then @xmath104 is b to a no - signalling . \iii ) if all @xmath188 and @xmath186 are tp and both @xmath185 and @xmath187 are constant maps , then @xmath104 is no - signalling between a and b. for example , we can choose @xmath189 , where @xmath188 and @xmath186 are cptp maps from @xmath190 to @xmath191 and @xmath192 to @xmath193 , respectively , and @xmath194 is a probability distribution . if we further have that @xmath185 and @xmath187 are constant maps , then we obtain a no - signalling correlation @xmath104 . clearly , for any such @xmath104 , neither of @xmath105 and @xmath107 can send classical information to @xmath106 or @xmath108 . to emphasize this special feature , this class of no - signalling correlations are said to be _ totally no - signalling_. we shall see later even this class of correlations could be very useful in assisting zero - error communication and simulation . in particular , we need the following technical result : [ rank2-ns ] let @xmath195 and @xmath196 be two cptp maps from @xmath190 to @xmath191 , and let @xmath197 be two cp maps from @xmath192 to @xmath193 . furthermore , assume there is unique @xmath129 such that @xmath198 is a constant channel . then @xmath199 is a no - signalling correlation if and only if both @xmath200 and @xmath201 are cptp maps , and @xmath202 is a constant map . this can be proven by directly applying the definition of quantum no - signalling correlations . two key points are : first , the uniqueness of @xmath6 such that @xmath198 is constant ; secondly , if @xmath203 for any traceless hermitian operator @xmath51 , @xmath204 is a constant map . a third result about the structure of no - signalling correlations is the following @xcite ( see also @xcite for an alternate proof , and @xcite for more discussions ) : [ ns - structure3 ] @xmath104 is b@xmath110a iff @xmath205 for two cptp maps @xmath206 and @xmath207 , where @xmath208 is an internal memory . this result is quite intuitive . it says that in the case that b can not communicate to a , we can actually have the output of a before we input to b. suppose now we are given a no - signalling map @xmath209 and a cptp map @xmath210 . when @xmath211 and @xmath212 , we can construct a new and unique map @xmath213 by feeding the output @xmath106 of @xmath104 into @xmath1 , and use the output @xmath167 of @xmath1 as the input @xmath107 to @xmath104 ( refer to fig . next we will show how to derive more explicit forms of this map . , width=415 ] let us start by considering the partition according to @xmath166 to look at @xmath104 . if @xmath104 is of product form @xmath214 where @xmath215 and @xmath216 , then clearly the composition must be given by @xmath217 . we can simply extend this construction to the superpositions of these product maps by linearity . i.e. , for a general @xmath218 , we define the new map by composing @xmath1 and @xmath104 as the following @xmath219 and this is clearly well - defined . we can also formulate @xmath2 in another useful way by considering the bipartition @xmath168 . suppose @xmath104 is given in the form of @xmath220 where @xmath182 , @xmath183 . then to compose @xmath104 and @xmath1 , the only thing we need to do is to compose @xmath1 and @xmath186 directly and take trace . that is , we have @xmath221 where the trace of super - operator @xmath222 on @xmath193 is given by @xmath223 for any orthonormal basis @xmath224 on @xmath193 in the sense of @xmath225 . this is just the natural generalization of the trace function of the square matrices to super - operators . it is easy to verify that @xmath226 holds for any @xmath227 and @xmath1 , and the trace is independent of the choice of the orthonormal basis @xmath224 . for instance , for any bipartite classical channel @xmath135 , and another classical channel @xmath228 , we can easily show that the map @xmath229 constructed by composing @xmath141 and @xmath230 is given by @xmath231 which coincides with the discussions in @xcite . note that the above two constructions of the map @xmath2 from @xmath104 and @xmath1 are quite general , and purely mathematical . indeed , we can form a map @xmath2 from any @xmath1 and @xmath104 . an interesting and important question is to ask whether @xmath2 is a cptp map when both @xmath1 and @xmath104 are . it turns out that whenever @xmath1 and @xmath104 are cp maps , @xmath2 should also be cp . this fact is actually a simple corollary of the teleportation protocol . indeed , we can easily see from the fig . 3 that @xmath232(\1_{b_o}\ox\phi_{bb_i'})\},\ ] ] where @xmath211 , and @xmath167 , @xmath107 , and @xmath123 are all isomorphic . the way to get the above equality is to first apply the teleportation protocol to the special case that @xmath233 , and then extend the result to the general case by linearity . the above expression not only provides a proof for the complete positivity of @xmath2 , but also the uniqueness of such @xmath2 . and @xmath104 from the viewpoint of teleportation.,width=340 ] so we have obtained that for any two maps @xmath234 and @xmath235 , we can uniquely construct a map @xmath236 by composing @xmath104 and @xmath1 , and trace out @xmath106 and @xmath107 . an explicit construction can be equivalently given by any of eqs . ( [ connection-1 ] ) , ( [ connection-2 ] ) , and ( [ connection-3 ] ) . furthermore , if @xmath104 and @xmath1 are cp , so is @xmath2 . to guarantee that @xmath2 is tp , we have to put further constraints on @xmath104 , but not on @xmath1 except that it is an arbitrary cptp map . we will show that such constraints are precisely the same as the constraints that b to a no - signalling ( b@xmath110 a ) . let @xmath234 and @xmath235 be two cptp maps , and let @xmath236 be the unique cp constructed by composing @xmath104 and @xmath1 . if @xmath104 is cptp and b to a no - signalling , then @xmath2 is also cptp for any cptp map @xmath1 . conversely , if @xmath2 is cptp for any @xmath1 , then @xmath104 has to be b to a no - signalling . the sufficiency is just a direct corollary of item i ) of proposition [ ns - structure1 ] or proposition [ ns - structure3 ] . the later actually provides a physical realization of this map @xmath2 . this constraint is logically reasonable as b to a no - signalling simply means that the input of the channel @xmath1 can not depend on its output ( otherwise we will have a closed loop , against the causality principle ) . now we will prove that the constraint of no - signalling from b to a is also necessary for @xmath2 to be cptp for any cptp @xmath1 . our strategy is to first prove this fact for two - input and two - output binary classical channel @xmath141 . then we can apply proposition [ binary - signalling ] for the general case . we can actually show that if @xmath141 is signalling from b to a , and the composition of @xmath141 and one - bit noiseless classical channel is not a legal classical channel anymore ( the output for some input is not a legal probability distribution ) . by contradiction , assume that the composition of @xmath104 and any cptp map @xmath1 is always cptp , but that @xmath104 is b to a signalling . applying proposition [ binary - signalling ] , we can find a two - input and two - output binary classical channel @xmath135 such that @xmath141 is constructed from @xmath104 by simply performing pre- and/or post - processing such that i ) @xmath237 ; ii ) @xmath141 is also b to a signalling ; iii ) the composition of @xmath141 and any classical channel @xmath16 to @xmath52 is also a legal classical channel . we will show such @xmath141 does not exist , hence complete the proof . actually , ii ) implies there are @xmath238 , such that @xmath239 w.o.l.g , we can assume @xmath240 , @xmath241 , @xmath242 , and @xmath243 . then the above inequality can be rewritten explicitly as @xmath244 on the other hand , the composition of @xmath141 and a one - bit noiseless classical channel @xmath245 is given by @xmath246 in particular , taking @xmath240 and applying the above inequality , we have @xmath247 this contradicts the fact that @xmath248 is a classical channel . thus , to guarantee that the composition @xmath2 of a two - input and two - output channel @xmath104 and any quantum channel from a to b is always a cptp map , @xmath104 is only required to be b to a no - signalling . the constraint of no - signalling from a to b is another natural requirement as we have assumed that a can not communicate to b directly , and the given channel @xmath1 is the only directed resource from a to b we can use . these considerations naturally lead us to quantum no - signalling correlations . for any integer @xmath249 , we denote by @xmath250 and @xmath251 classical registers with size @xmath249 . we use @xmath252 to denote the noiseless classical channel that can send @xmath249 messages from @xmath16 to @xmath167 , _ i.e. _ @xmath253 , or equivalenyly , @xmath254 if a channel @xmath1 can simulate @xmath255 , we say that @xmath249 messages can be perfectly transmitted by one use of @xmath1 . the problem we are interested in is to determine the largest possible @xmath249 , which will be called one - shot zero - error classical transmission capability of @xmath1 assisted with no - signalling correlations . we restate here the result that we will prove in this subsection . * theorem [ capacity-1-shot ] * _ the one - shot zero - error classical capability ( quantified as the largest number of messages ) of @xmath1 assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations depends only on the non - commutative graph @xmath26 , and is given by the integer part of the following sdp : @xmath44 where @xmath23 denotes the projection onto the the subspace @xmath45 . + hence we are motivated to call @xmath46 the _ no - signalling assisted independence number of @xmath26 . _ _ to make the indices of the choi - jamiokowski matrices more readable , we reserve the unprimed letters such as @xmath105 and @xmath107 for the reference systems ( thus as the indices of choi - jamiokowski matrices ) , and use the primed versions @xmath122 and @xmath123 as the inputs to the quantum channels . we will use a general no - signalling correlation @xmath104 with choi - jamiokowski matrix @xmath125 and the channel @xmath1 , to exactly simulate a noiseless classical channel @xmath255 . our goal is to determine the maximum integer @xmath249 when such simulation is possible . in this case both @xmath256 and @xmath257 are classical , and @xmath258 , @xmath259 . we will show that @xmath125 can be chosen as the following form : @xmath260 where @xmath261 is the choi - jamiokowski matrix of the noiseless classical channel @xmath255 , and @xmath262 and @xmath263 are positive semidefinite operators . we will show that the no - signalling conditions are translated into @xmath264 with some state @xmath265 . in other words , both @xmath266 and @xmath267 are choi - jamiokowski matrices of channels from @xmath11 to @xmath268 whose weighted sum is equal to a constant channel mapping quantum states in @xmath167 to a fixed state @xmath269 . let us first have a closer look at the the mathematical structure of @xmath125 . rewrite @xmath125 into the following form , @xmath270 where @xmath271 is the choi - jamiokowski matrix of the classical channel @xmath272 that sends each @xmath273 into a uniform distribution of @xmath274 . in other words , the no - signalling correlation @xmath104 should have the following form : @xmath275 and @xmath204 and @xmath227 are cp maps from @xmath167 to @xmath16 corresponding to choi - jamiokowski matrices @xmath266 and @xmath267 , respectively . now we can directly apply lemma [ rank2-ns ] to @xmath104 in eq . ( [ simplified - ns ] ) to obtain the no - signalling constraints in eqs . ( [ ns - condition1 ] ) and ( [ ns - condition2 ] ) . first , the constraints for @xmath276 are automatically satisfied due to the special forms of @xmath255 and @xmath272 , and @xmath277 is the unique number such that @xmath278 is constant . the no - signalling constraint @xmath279 is equivalent to that @xmath204 and @xmath227 are cptp maps , and @xmath280 is some constant channel . when composing @xmath1 with @xmath104 in eq . ( [ simplified - ns ] ) , we have the following channel @xmath281 the zero - error constraint requires @xmath282 , which is equivalent to @xmath283 , or @xmath284 where @xmath285 is the choi - jamiokowski matrix of @xmath1 ( strictly speaking , this is the complex conjugate of the choi - jamiokowski matrix of @xmath1 , but this does not make any difference to the problem we are studying ) . since @xmath266 and @xmath267 depend on each other , we can eliminate one of them . for instance , we only keep @xmath266 . then the existence of @xmath267 will be equivalent to @xmath286 by absorbing @xmath249 into @xmath269 and introducing @xmath287 , we get @xmath249 as the integer part of @xmath288 which ends the proof . now we provide a detailed derivation of the form ( [ omega - cns0 ] ) of the no - signalling correlation . assume the channel is @xmath289 , and the no - signalling correlation we will use is @xmath290 . suppose we can send @xmath249 messages exactly by one use of the channel @xmath1 when assisted by @xmath104 . then we should have ( refer to fig . 3 and note @xmath291 , @xmath292 , @xmath293 , @xmath294 , and @xmath295 ) @xmath296=\ketbra{m}{m}_{m_b}\ \forall m\in\{1,\ldots , m\}.\ ] ] the choi - jamiokowski matrix of @xmath104 , say @xmath297 , should satisfy the following constraints @xmath298 furthermore , noticing that @xmath299 we have @xmath300 thus the left hand side ( l.h.s ) of eq . ( [ teleportation ] ) gives , for all @xmath301 , @xmath302=\ketbra{m}{m}_{m_b}.\ ] ] in other words , for any @xmath303 , we have @xmath304 the next crucial step is to simplify the form of @xmath125 . we will study all the possible forms of @xmath125 satisfying the above equation . ( any such operator is said to be feasible ) . since both @xmath250 and @xmath251 are classical registers , we can perform the dephasing operation on them and assume @xmath125 has the following form @xmath305 where @xmath306 might not be identical for different pairs @xmath307 . to further simplify the form of @xmath125 , we next exploit the permutation invariance of @xmath255 . more precisely , for any @xmath308 permutation @xmath309 , if @xmath297 is feasible , then @xmath310 is also feasible . furthermore , if @xmath311 and @xmath312 are feasible , so is any convex combination @xmath313 for @xmath314 . with these two observations , from any feasible @xmath125 that has been dephased , we can always construct a new feasible @xmath315 by performing the following twirling operation @xmath316 by applying schur s lemma to the symmetry group @xmath317 , we can see that @xmath315 can be chosen as the following form @xmath318 which has exactly the same form as eq . ( [ omega - cns0 ] ) . the sdp characterization of theorem [ capacity-1-shot ] , @xmath319 has a dual . it is given by @xmath320 which can be derived by the usual means ; by strong duality , which applies here , the values of both the primal and the dual sdp coincide . for an easy example of the evaluation of these sdps , @xmath321 for the cq - graph @xmath322 of the noiseless classical channel @xmath323 of @xmath324 symbols . the kraus operator space of the noiseless @xmath324-level quantum channel @xmath325 is @xmath326 , and has @xmath327 . by inspection of the primal sdp , for any @xmath92 and @xmath93 , @xmath328 , because the tensor product of feasible solutions of the sdp ( [ eq : upsilon ] ) is feasible for @xmath329 . in particular , we do not know whether equality holds here ( sometimes it does ) ; the most natural way for proving this would be to use the dual sdp ( [ eq : upsilon - dual ] ) , but to use it to show `` @xmath331 '' by tensoring together dual feasible solutions would require that @xmath332 . leaving this aside , this last observation is why @xmath46 is rightfully called the no - signalling assisted independence number , and not its integer part . indeed , the number of messages we can send via @xmath333 is @xmath334 , for non - integer @xmath46 and sufficiently large @xmath324 . for convenience we restate here the two theorems already announced in the introduction . * theorem [ review - simulation-1-shot ] * _ the one - shot zero - error classical simulation cost ( quantified as the minimum number of messages ) of a quantum channel @xmath1 under quantum no - signalling assistance is given by @xmath60 . here , here , @xmath61 is the choi - jamiokowski matrix of @xmath1 , and @xmath62 is the conditional min - entropy defined as follows @xcite : @xmath63 _ * theorem [ thm : l-1-shot - cost ] * _ the one - shot zero - error classical simulation cost of a kraus operator space @xmath26 under quantum no - signalling assistance is given by the integer ceiling of @xmath72 where @xmath23 denotes the projection onto the subspace @xmath45 . _ in this case we have @xmath335 and @xmath336 are classical , @xmath337 , @xmath338 . we will show that w.l.o.g . @xmath339 with positive semidefinite @xmath266 and @xmath267 . then according to lemma [ rank2-ns ] , the no - signalling conditions are equivalent to @xmath340 for a state @xmath341 . now , there are two variants of the problem . first , to simulate the precise channel @xmath1 , @xmath266 has to be equal to @xmath24 . by identifying @xmath342 and eliminating @xmath267 , we get the solution for the minimal @xmath249 as smallest integer @xmath343 proving theorem [ review - simulation-1-shot ] . the latter is then also asymptotic cost of simulating many copies of @xmath230 because the conditional min - entropy is additive , eq . ( [ eq : channel - sim ] ) . furthermore , to simulate the `` cheapest '' @xmath1 with choi - jamiokowski matrix supporting on @xmath23 , we get @xmath344 which is the claim of theorem [ thm : l-1-shot - cost ] . now we provide a more detailed derivation of the form of no - signalling correlations . suppose we can use a noiseless classical channel @xmath255 to simulate a quantum channel @xmath345 . the no - signalling correlation we will use is @xmath346 . then we have @xmath347.\ ] ] denote the choi - jamiokowski matrix of @xmath104 as @xmath348 thus the choi - jamiokowski matrix of @xmath1 is given by @xmath349 \\ & = \sum_m \tr_{m_am_b}[\ketbra{mm}{mm}_{m_am_b}\o_{m_am_bab } ] \\ & = \tr_{m_am_b } d_{m_am_b}\o_{m_am_bab},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath350 is the choi - jamiokowski matrix of the noiseless classical channel @xmath351 , as before . in summary , to simulate @xmath1 exactly , we have @xmath352 and the no - signalling constraints on @xmath125 . by dephasing and twirling classical registers @xmath250 and @xmath251 ( refer to the case of zero - error communication ) , we can choose w.l.o.g @xmath297 to have the form in eq . ( [ simulation : ns ] ) . we end this subsection , like the previous one , recording the primal and dual sdp form of @xmath353 , again equal by strong duality : @xmath354 its dual sdp is @xmath355 just as for the no - signalling assisted independence number @xmath46 , @xmath356 and hence @xmath357 . for cq - graphs @xmath26 we can say a bit more : since @xmath322 is a cq - graph , too , we find @xmath358 , by proposition [ prop : sigma - cq - multi ] in section [ subsec : asymptotic - cost - cq ] below . for a classical channel with bipartite graph @xmath359 , such that @xmath360 is a special type of cq - graph , it was shown in @xcite that @xmath361 where @xmath362 is the _ fractional packing number _ @xcite ( which is equal to its _ fractional covering number _ ) : @xmath363 in fact , there it was shown ( and one can check immediately from theorems [ capacity-1-shot ] and [ thm : l-1-shot - cost ] ) that in this case @xmath364 furthermore , to attain the simulation cost @xmath77 , as well as @xmath78 , asymptotically no non - local resources beyond shared randomness are necessary @xcite . we will see in the following that quantum channels exhibit more complexity . indeed , while @xmath365 is clearly multiplicative in the channel ( or equivalently in @xmath47 ) , cf . @xcite , and @xmath362 is well - known to be multiplicative under direct products of graphs , cf . @xcite , by contrast @xmath366 and @xmath367 are only super- and sub - multiplicative , respectively : @xmath368 we know that the first inequality can be strict ( see subsection [ 2-state - example ] below ) , and suspect that the second can be strict , too . thus we are facing a regularization issue to compute the zero - error capacity and the zero - error simulation cost , assisted by no - signalling correlations : @xmath369 a standard causality argument , together with entanglement - assisted coding for the simulation of quantum channels @xcite , implies also @xmath370 where @xmath371 is the minimum of the entanglement - assisted classical capacity of quantum channels @xmath1 such that @xmath71 , i.e. , @xmath59 is a subspace of @xmath26 . with the quantum mutual information @xmath372 of the state @xmath373 , where @xmath374 is a purification of @xmath375 : @xmath376 where the last equality follows from the sion s minimax theorem @xcite . for more properties , including the above minimax formulas , and an operational interpretation of @xmath377 as the entanglement - assisted capacity of @xmath26 ( i.e. the maximum rate of block codings adapted simultaneously to all channels @xmath378 such that @xmath379 ) , we refer the reader to @xcite . to put better and easier to use bounds on @xmath380 and @xmath381 , we introduce the semidefinite packing number : @xmath382 which we have given in primal and dual form ; this generalizes the form given in eq . ( [ eq : aram - cq ] ) for cq - graphs . it was suggested to us in the past by aram harrow @xcite for its nice mathematical properties . a slightly modified and more symmetric form is given by @xmath383 again both in primal and dual form . from these it is straightforward to see that @xmath88 and @xmath384 are both sub- and super - multiplicative , and so @xmath385 both definitions reduce to the familiar notion of fractional packing number @xmath362 when @xmath26 is associated to a bipartite graph @xmath359 , coming from a classical channel @xmath1 . furthermore , @xmath88 and @xmath384 are equal for cq - graphs . however , we will see later that in general they are different . for any non - commutative bipartite graph @xmath386 , @xmath387 consequently , @xmath388 . from the sdp ( [ eq : sigma ] ) for @xmath353 , we get operators @xmath389 and @xmath267 such that @xmath390 , with @xmath391 and @xmath392 . hence @xmath393 and so @xmath394 i.e. @xmath395 is feasible for the dual formulation of @xmath384 , hence the result follows . below we will see that this bound ( both in its one - shot and regularized form ) is in general strict , indeed already for cq - channels it is not a strict equality . we do not know whether @xmath46 is in general related to @xmath88 , but we will show bounds in either direction for cq - channels . suppose that the cq - channel @xmath1 acts as @xmath396 , with support @xmath397 and support projection @xmath82 of @xmath83 . then , the non - commutative bipartite graph @xmath26 associated with @xmath1 is given by @xmath398 , and the projection for the choi - jamiokowski matrix is @xmath399 . the sdp ( [ eq : upsilon ] ) easily simplifies to @xmath400 the semidefinite packing number ( [ eq : aram ] ) , on the other hand , simplifies to @xmath401 as this is an sdp relaxation of the problem ( [ eq : upsilon : cq - channel ] ) , we obtain : [ lemma : u - aram - bound ] for a non - commutative bipartite cq - graph @xmath386 , @xmath402 consequently , @xmath403 . in general , @xmath46 can be strictly smaller than @xmath88 , see subsection [ 2-state - example ] below , but we shall prove equality for the regularization , by exhibiting a lower bound @xmath404 the way to do this is to take a feasible solution @xmath405 of the sdp ( [ eq : aram : cq - channel ] ) ; w.l.o.g . its value @xmath406 , otherwise the above statement is trivial . on strings @xmath407 of length @xmath73 this gives a feasible solution @xmath408 for @xmath36 , with value @xmath409 now for @xmath410 different symbols @xmath411 there are at most @xmath412 many types of strings , hence there is one type @xmath413 such that @xmath414 restricting the input of the channel to @xmath415 ( while the output is still @xmath416 ) , we thus loose only a polynomial factor of the semidefinite packing number . what we gain is that the inputs are all of the same type , which means that the output projectors @xmath417 are related to each other by unitaries @xmath418 permuting the @xmath73 @xmath167-systems . note that then also all of the @xmath419 on the left hand side above are the same , say @xmath420 , and hence the left hand side is @xmath421 . abstractly , we are thus in the following situation : assume that there exists a transitive group action by unitary conjugation on the @xmath82 , i.e. we have a finite group @xmath8 acting transitively on the labels @xmath96 ( running over a set of size @xmath230 ) , and a unitary representation @xmath422 , such that @xmath423 for @xmath424 . in other words , the entire set of @xmath84 is the orbit @xmath425 of a fiducial element @xmath426 under the group action . then we can twirl the sdp ( [ eq : aram : cq - channel ] ) and w.l.o.g . assume that all @xmath405 are identical to @xmath427 , so the constraint reduces to @xmath428 , meaning that the largest admissible @xmath427 is @xmath429 , and the semidefinite packing number @xmath430 . from this we see that the representation theory of @xmath422 has a bearing on the semidefinite packing number @xmath88 ; cf . @xcite for some basic facts that we shall invoke in the following . indeed , it also governs @xmath46 since we can do the same twirling operation and find that in the sdp ( [ eq : upsilon : cq - channel ] ) we have w.l.o.g . that all @xmath405 are equal to the same @xmath427 , but also that for @xmath431 , w.l.o.g . @xmath432 . in particular , in this case @xmath433 let us be a little more explicit in the reduction of the sdp ( [ eq : upsilon : cq - channel ] ) to the above sdp : let @xmath427 and @xmath434 be feasible as above , and denote by @xmath435 the subgroup of @xmath8 leaving @xmath42 invariant , @xmath436 . by lagrange s theorem , @xmath437 . then , @xmath438 is also feasible with the same @xmath427 , using @xmath439 for all @xmath440 . letting @xmath441 for any @xmath442 such that @xmath443 , and @xmath444 , then yields a feasible solution for ( [ eq : upsilon : cq - channel ] ) and this is well - defined . thus @xmath46 is not smaller than the above sdp . in the other direction , let @xmath405 and @xmath445 be feasible for ( [ eq : upsilon : cq - channel ] ) , i.e. @xmath446 . letting @xmath447 and @xmath448 yields a feasible solution for ( [ eq : upsilon : covariant - cq - channel ] ) . if the representation @xmath422 happens to be irreducible , we are lucky because then the group average in the second line in eq . ( [ eq : upsilon : covariant - cq - channel ] ) is automatically proportional to the identity , by schur s lemma . hence the optimal choice is @xmath449 and we find @xmath450 . in general this wo nt be the case , but if the representation @xmath422 is `` not too far '' from being irreducible , in a sense made precise in the following proposition , then @xmath46 is not too much smaller than @xmath88 : [ key - lemma ] for a set of projections @xmath82 on @xmath167 with a transitive group action by conjugation under @xmath422 , let @xmath451 be the isotypical decomposition of @xmath167 into irreps @xmath452 of @xmath422 , with multiplicity spaces @xmath453 . denote the number of terms @xmath454 by @xmath455 , and the largest occurring multiplicity by @xmath456 . then , for the corresponding cq - graph @xmath26 , @xmath457 if @xmath458 . assume that we have a feasible @xmath459 for @xmath88 such that @xmath460 . our point of departure is the sdp ( [ eq : upsilon : covariant - cq - channel ] ) : for given @xmath461 and @xmath462 , schur s lemma tells us @xmath463 where @xmath464 is the projection onto the irrep @xmath452 , @xmath465 is a semidefinite operator on @xmath453 . feasibility of @xmath427 and @xmath434 ( to be precise : the equality constraints ) is equivalent to @xmath466 , the projection onto @xmath453 , for all @xmath454 . now , for each @xmath454 choose an orthogonal basis @xmath467 of hermitians over @xmath453 , with @xmath468 and @xmath469 for @xmath470 . then the @xmath471 form a basis of the @xmath422-invariant operators , hence our sdp can be rephrased as @xmath472 notice that here , the semidefinite constraints on @xmath434 leave quite some room , whereas we have `` only '' @xmath473 linear conditions to satisfy . given @xmath459 satisfying the constraint of @xmath88 , our strategy now will be to show that we can construct a @xmath474 such that the above equations are true with @xmath475 on the left hand side , and with a factor @xmath476 on the right hand side . we will choose @xmath477 and thus there is a feasible solution with @xmath478 to ( [ eq : upsilon : covariant - cq - channel-2 ] ) , hence @xmath479 as claimed . in detail , introduce a new variable @xmath480 , with @xmath481 which makes sure that @xmath434 is automatically supported on the orthogonal complement of @xmath426 . rewrite the equations @xmath482 in terms of @xmath51 , introducing the notation @xmath483 this gives , noting @xmath484 for all @xmath96 because of the @xmath422 invariance of @xmath485 , @xmath486 what we need of the coefficients @xmath487 is that they can not be too large : from @xmath488 we get @xmath489 our goal will be to find a `` nice '' dual set @xmath490 to the @xmath491 , i.e. @xmath492 , with which we can write a solution @xmath493 . to this end , we construct first the dual set @xmath494 of the @xmath495 , which is easy : @xmath496 so that indeed @xmath497 . now , consider the @xmath498-matrix @xmath395 , @xmath499 with the deviation @xmath500 here , @xmath501 using @xmath502 , the unitary invariance of the trace norm , and lemma [ lemma : tracenorm - trace ] below . since @xmath503 is invariant under the action of @xmath422 , we have @xmath504 for all @xmath96 , and using @xmath505 we get @xmath506 with this we get that @xmath507 if @xmath508 . assuming @xmath509 ( which will be the case with our later choice ) , we thus know that @xmath395 is invertible ; in fact , we have @xmath510 with @xmath511 , hence @xmath512 and so @xmath513 i.e. , writing @xmath514 we get @xmath515 the invertibility of @xmath395 implies that there is a dual set to @xmath491 in @xmath516 . indeed , from the definition of @xmath517 and the dual sets , @xmath518 now we can finally write down our candidate solution to eqs . ( [ eq : x - and - t ] ) : @xmath519 the remainder term `` rest '' can be bounded as follows : @xmath520 using eqs . ( [ eq : t - bound ] ) and ( [ eq : tilde - delta - bound ] ) . thus we find @xmath521 if @xmath522 and @xmath523 . in this case , @xmath524 and we can wrap things up : @xmath525 satisfies @xmath526 as well as @xmath527 i.e. , we get a feasible solution @xmath528 for @xmath46 . [ lemma : tracenorm - trace ] let @xmath375 be a state and @xmath529 a projection in a hilbert space @xmath530 . then , @xmath531 more generally , for @xmath480 and a povm element @xmath532 , @xmath533 we start with the first chain of inequalities . the left hand one follows directly from the definition of the trace norm . for the right hand one , choose a purification of @xmath534 on @xmath535 . now , @xmath536 and @xmath537 . thus , by the monotonicity of the trace norm under partial trace , @xmath538 the second chain is homogenous in @xmath51 , so we may w.l.o.g . assume that @xmath539 , i.e. @xmath540 is a state . for a general povm element @xmath262 there is an embedding @xmath541 of the hilbert space @xmath530 into a larger hilbert space @xmath542 and a projection @xmath529 in @xmath542 such that @xmath543 . then , @xmath544 as before by the definition of the trace norm , and using the invariance of the trace number under unitaries and the first part , @xmath545 which concludes the proof . for the permutation action of @xmath546 on @xmath416 , the irreps @xmath454 are labelled by young diagrams with at most @xmath547 rows , hence @xmath548 , and it is well - known that @xmath549 ( * ? ? ? 6.2 ) , @xcite . thus the previous proposition yields directly the following result , observing that @xmath455 and @xmath249 are polynomially bounded in @xmath73 , whilst @xmath550 grows exponentially . [ c - q - capacity - aram ] let @xmath26 be a non - commutative bipartite cq - graph with @xmath551 inputs and output dimension @xmath547 . then for sufficiently large @xmath73 , @xmath552 consequently , @xmath553 . lemma [ lemma : u - aram - bound ] and proposition [ c - q - capacity - aram ] together prove theorem [ thm : cq - capacity ] . [ c - q - capacity - additivity ] for any two non - commutative bipartite cq - graphs @xmath92 and @xmath93 , @xmath554 . here we study the asymptotic zero - error simulation cost of a non - commutative bipartite cq - graph @xmath398 , where the subspace @xmath397 is the support of the projection @xmath82 . thus , @xmath399 and the sdp ( [ eq : sigma ] ) easily simplifies to @xmath555 similarly , the dual sdp ( [ eq : sigma - dual ] ) simplifies to @xmath556 [ prop : sigma - cq - multi ] for non - commutative bipartite cq - graphs @xmath26 , @xmath353 is multiplicative under tensor products , i.e. @xmath557 where @xmath92 and @xmath93 are arbitrary non - commutative bipartite cq - graphs . the sub - multiplicativity of @xmath353 is evident from ( [ eq : sigma : cq - channel ] ) . we will show that the super - multiplicativity follows from the dual sdp ( [ eq : dual : cq - channel ] ) . indeed , let @xmath92 and @xmath93 correspond to @xmath84 and @xmath558 , respectively , and assume that @xmath559 and @xmath560 are optimal solutions to @xmath561 and @xmath562 in dual sdps , respectively . then we have @xmath563 where @xmath564 denotes the minimal eigenvalue of the linear operator @xmath565 in the support of @xmath82 . similarly , we have @xmath566 clearly , we have @xmath567 so @xmath568 is a feasible solution to the dual sdp for @xmath569 . since the dual sdp takes maximization , we have @xmath570 from the above result we can read off directly for any non - commutative bipartite cq - graph @xmath386 , @xmath571 in fact , @xmath572 for any two non - commutative bipartite cq - graphs @xmath92 and @xmath93 . this theorem motivates us to call @xmath573 the _ semidefinite covering number _ , at least for cq - graphs @xmath26 , in analogy to a result from @xcite which states that the zero - error simulation rate of a bipartite graph is given by its fractional packing number . note however that while fractional packing and fractional covering number are dual linear programmes and yield the same value , the semidefinite versions @xmath574 are in general distinct ; already in the following subsection [ 2-state - example ] we will see a simple example for strict inequality . for general non - commutative bipartite graph @xmath26 , we do not know whether the one - shot simulation cost also gives the asymptotic simulation cost . however , this is true when @xmath575 corresponds to an extremal channel @xmath576 , which is well - known to be equivalent to the set of linear operators @xmath577 being linearly independent @xcite . actually , in this case , there can only be a unique channel @xmath1 such that @xmath43 , and furthermore , a unique channel @xmath578 such that @xmath579 . hence @xmath580 thus we have the following result : [ extremal - channel - cost ] let @xmath575 be an extremal non - commutative bipartite graph in the sense that @xmath577 is linearly independent . then @xmath581 for the choi - jamiokowski state of the unique channel @xmath1 with @xmath71 . furthermore , @xmath582 if both @xmath92 and @xmath93 are extremal non - commutative bipartite graphs . the fact that the set of extremal non - commutative bipartite graphs has a one - to - one correspondence to the set of extremal quantum channels has greatly simplified the simulation problem . how to use this property to simplify the assisted - communication problem is still unclear . here we will examine our above findings of one - shot and asymptotic capacities and simulation costs for the simplest possible cq - channel , which has only two inputs and two pure output states @xmath583 , w.l.o.g . @xmath584 with @xmath585 . in fact , we shall assume @xmath586 since the two equality cases are trivial ( noiseless classical channel and completely noisy channel , respectively ) . note @xmath587 ; the non - commutative bipartite cq - graph @xmath588 . we can work out all the optimization problems introduced before : @xmath589 eq . ( [ twostate - cq - n - shot ] ) directly gives us @xmath590 since the signal ensemble is symmetric under the pauli @xmath591 unitary ( which exchanges two output states ) , it is easy to evaluate @xmath592 , eq . ( [ twostate - cq - aram ] ) . also @xmath377 is easy to compute , yielding eq . ( [ twostate - cq - cmine ] ) . for pure state cq - channels @xmath1 , by dephasing the input of any channel with kraus operators in @xmath593 , we get a simulation of @xmath1 itself , hence @xmath594 proving eq . ( [ twostate - cq - cost ] ) . noticing that @xmath1 is the unique extremal channel in @xmath26 , we can also apply theorem [ extremal - channel - cost ] to obtain eqs . ( [ twostate - cq - cmine ] ) and ( [ twostate - cq - cost ] ) directly . so we have @xmath595 and both inequalities become strict when @xmath596 ( refer to fig . ( green ) , @xmath597 ( red ) and @xmath381 ( blue ) for the cq - channel of two pure states , as a function of @xmath598.,width=415 ] the largest effort goes into calculating or bounding the numbers @xmath599 in eq . ( [ twostate - cq - n - shot ] ) . in this case we can obtain much better lower bounds ( only at most one bit less than optimal value by @xmath73 uses ) compared to theorem [ thm : cq - capacity ] . _ one copy @xmath600 _ : let @xmath601 be the projection orthogonal to @xmath82 ( which is rank - one ) , so that @xmath602 with a number @xmath603 . because of the @xmath591-symmetry , @xmath604 we can symmetrize any solution and assume @xmath605 and @xmath606 . then the normalization condition reads @xmath607 which implies @xmath608 . hence the maximum value of @xmath609 . _ many copies @xmath610 _ : in this case it is difficult to find the optimum , but it is enough that we show the achievability of @xmath611 for sufficiently large @xmath73 . note that this already implies that the sdp for the zero - error number of messages is not multiplicative ! somehow , what s happening is that the normalization condition of @xmath612 is a non - trivial constraint because @xmath445 has to be supported on the orthogonal complement of @xmath82 ; this hurts us in the case @xmath600 . now in the case of many copies , @xmath82 is a tensor product of single - system projections , hence the orthogonal complement is asymptotically dominating . we have seen how these considerations help in understanding the general case . we have @xmath613 states @xmath614 , indexed by @xmath73-bit strings @xmath615 , which are related by qubit - wise @xmath591-symmetry : @xmath616 which motivates that we find @xmath617 ( orthogonal to @xmath618 ) and define @xmath619 let @xmath620 where @xmath621 is the weight ( the number of @xmath165 s ) of the @xmath73-bit string @xmath615 . we also denote @xmath622 which is always a projection for @xmath623 and vanishing for @xmath624 . for @xmath625 , we have @xmath626 clearly @xmath627 for @xmath628 . now we set all @xmath629 equal to @xmath427 , and propose the following ansatz @xmath630 where @xmath427 and @xmath631 are non - negative eigenvalues to be determined . note that @xmath617 is automatically supported on the orthogonal complement of @xmath618 . we need @xmath632 or equivalently , @xmath633 using the @xmath634 symmetry , we can calculate @xmath635 similarly @xmath636 and @xmath637 applying the property that @xmath638 , we can see that ( * ) is equivalent to @xmath639 and @xmath640 then @xmath641 we need @xmath642 , which is equivalent to @xmath643 , or @xmath644 the first term of the left hand side ( lhs ) of the above inequality achieves the maximum when @xmath645 , and the second term of the lhs reaches the maximum when @xmath646 . so we only need @xmath647 or @xmath648 which is always satisfied when @xmath73 is large enough . note that when @xmath649 , we have @xmath650 the above constraint is tight in the sense @xmath651 if @xmath652 ; otherwise @xmath653 . more precisely , we have @xmath654 when @xmath652 , and @xmath655 when @xmath656 . let us consider now the more general case with two output states @xmath68 and @xmath69 with projections @xmath426 and @xmath657 , respectively . denote @xmath658 @xmath659 is known as the maximal fidelity between @xmath68 and @xmath69 , but depends only on their supports @xmath660 and @xmath92 . a key property of the maximal fidelity is the following @xcite : there exists a cptp map @xmath661 such that @xmath662 and @xmath663 if and only if @xmath664 . applying this result , we can show that the case of two general output states @xmath68 and @xmath69 is simply equivalent to the case of two pure output states @xmath665 and @xmath666 such that @xmath667 . thus we have @xmath668 as we have seen , different non - commutative bipartite graphs @xmath26 , even cq - graphs , having the same confusability graph @xmath8 , can have different assisted zero - error capacity @xmath76 and simulation cost @xmath78 ; c.f . the last subsection [ 2-state - example ] in the previous section . a classical undirected graph is given by @xmath669 , where @xmath670 is the set of vertices , and @xmath671 is the set of edges . as shown in previous work @xcite , @xmath8 is naturally associated with a non - commutative graph , denoted @xmath101 , via the following way : @xmath672 where @xmath673 means confusability : @xmath674 or @xmath675 is an edge of the graph @xcite . hence the questions we are facing are the maximum and minimum @xmath76 and @xmath78 over all cq - graphs @xmath26 with @xmath676 . while the maximum is clearly @xmath677 for both quantities , the minima turn out to be much more interesting . we restate here the main result we will go on to prove in this section . * theorem [ thm : theta ] * _ for any classical graph @xmath8 , the lovsz number @xmath9 is the minimum zero - error classical capacity assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations of any cq - channels that have @xmath8 as non - commutative graph , _ i.e. _ @xmath100 where the minimization is over cq - graphs @xmath26 . + in particular , equality holds for any cq - channel @xmath102 such that @xmath103 is an optimal orthogonal representation for @xmath8 in the sense of lovsz original definition @xcite . _ the proof of this result is achieved by combining two facts about the semidefinite packing number for cq - channels : 1 ) @xmath88 gives the zero - error classical capacity assisted with no - signaling correlations for a cq - channel ; 2 ) the lovsz number @xmath9 of a graph is given by the minimization of @xmath88 for all non - commutative bipartite graph @xmath26 that generate the same confusability graph @xmath8 . the first fact has been proven in theorem [ c - q - capacity - aram ] , so we focus on the second for the rest of the section . let @xmath678 be a kraus operator space with @xmath679 , and let @xmath680 be the non - normalized maximally entangled state . then @xmath529 , the projection on the support of the choi - jamiokowski state , can be written as @xmath681 we can rewrite the semidefinite packing number @xmath88 using these kraus operators @xmath682 : @xmath683 note that @xmath682 spans a valid kraus operator space of a quantum channel . so @xmath684 ( positive definite ) . the dual sdp is @xmath685 and we can easily verify that both the primal and the dual are strictly feasible by choosing @xmath686 and @xmath687 ( here @xmath688 is sufficiently large ) , respectively . hence strong duality holds . we will start by deriving some minimax representations of @xmath88 . let us introduce @xmath689 where @xmath690 and @xmath691 represent the maximal and the minimal eigenvalues of a hermitian operator @xmath395 , respectively , and @xmath692 , @xmath693 are cp maps ( but not necessarily trace or unit preserving ) ; @xmath375 and @xmath265 range over all density operators , i.e. @xmath694 and @xmath695 . in the second and the fourth equalities above , we have employed the following well - known characterizations : @xmath696 in the third equality we have employed the obvious equality @xmath697 , and von neumann s minimax theorem @xcite , since @xmath698 is a linear function with respect to @xmath375 and @xmath265 , and @xmath375 and @xmath265 range over convex compact sets . [ lemma : aram - dual ] under the above definitions , @xmath699 for any non - commutative bipartite graph @xmath26 . suppose that @xmath700 for some @xmath462 . let us construct a density operator @xmath701 . by the assumption @xmath702 , we have @xmath703 or equivalently @xmath704 by the definition of @xmath705 , we have @xmath706 conversely , suppose that @xmath707 for some density operator @xmath68 . then we have @xmath708 , and thus @xmath709 that means @xmath710 is a feasible solution of the sdp defining the semidefinite packing number . by the definition of @xmath88 , we know that @xmath711 concluding the proof . focussing on the special class of cq - channels , which are in some sense the direct quantum generalizations of classical channels , we are now ready for of theorem [ thm : theta ] let @xmath26 correspond to a cq - channel @xmath712 , and let @xmath82 be the projection on the support of quantum states @xmath83 . it will be more convenient to study @xmath705 instead of @xmath88 . actually , applying the above minimax representation to this special case , we have @xmath713 where @xmath714 ranges over probability distributions , and @xmath265 ranges over density operators . the right - most expression motivates us to introduce some notations . by definition , @xmath84 is an orthogonal representation ( or ) of the confusability graph @xmath8 induced by the cq - channel . the value of an or @xmath84 is defined as follows : @xmath715 we introduce the following function of a graph @xmath8 , @xmath716 where the maximization ranges over all possible ors of @xmath8 . clearly , if we require that an or consists of only rank - one projections and @xmath265 takes only rank - one projection , then @xmath717 , the reciprocal of the lovsz number of @xmath8 @xcite . it has been shown in @xcite that even allowing @xmath82 to be general projection but @xmath265 to be rank - one projection , there is no difference between @xmath718 and @xmath719 . however , if @xmath265 is a mixed state , we can only have @xmath720 . interestingly , we can show that equality does hold . in fact , it is evident that if @xmath84 is an or for a graph @xmath8 , then @xmath721 remains an or for the same graph , where @xmath167 is any auxiliary system . now the value of @xmath84 with respect to general mixed states , is the same as the value of @xmath721 with respect to pure states . that is , @xmath722 where @xmath723 . the above equality follows directly from the fact that @xmath724 where @xmath725 is any purification of @xmath265 . summarizing , we have @xmath726 and we are done . as a final comment on the above proof , note that for a fixed or @xmath84 , we can not always choose the optimal handle @xmath265 as a pure state the restriction to rank - one projectors and pure state handle only emerges as we optimize over both elements . we would like to interpret theorem [ thm : theta ] to say intuitively that the zero - error capacity of a graph @xmath8 assisted by no - signalling correlations is @xmath9 . the problematic part of such a manner of speaking is that there are many cq - graphs @xmath26 with the same confusability graph @xmath8 , but the no - signalling assisted capacity may vary with these @xmath26 . however , note that for any ( finite ) family of cq - graphs @xmath727 such that @xmath728 , @xmath729 , we can construct a cq - graph @xmath26 that `` dominates '' all of the @xmath727 in the sense that any no - signalling assisted code for @xmath26 can be used directly for @xmath727 because actually @xmath730 : @xmath731 by going from direct sums to direct integrals , we can thus construct a universal cq - graph @xmath732 which dominates _ all _ @xmath727 with confusability graph @xmath8 , in fact contains them up to isomorphism . any no - signalling assisted code for this object will deal in particular with every eligible channel simultaneously . the only caveat is that the @xmath733 are subspaces in an a priori infinite dimensional hilbert space , and all of our proofs ( in particular that of theorem [ thm : cq - capacity ] ) require finite dimension as a technical condition . we conjecture however that the capacity result of theorem [ thm : cq - capacity ] still holds in that setting . just as we were looking at the smallest zero - error capacity over all cq - channels with a given confusability graph @xmath8 in this section , we can study the minimum simulation cost over all cq - graphs @xmath26 with @xmath734 . to be precise , we are interested in @xmath735 and the asymptotic simulation cost ( regularization ) @xmath736 where @xmath737 denotes the @xmath73-fold strong graph product . the latter limit exists and equals the infimum because evidently @xmath738 . for a cq - graph @xmath26 , we have @xmath739 in fact for every eligible cq - channel @xmath1 with non - commutative bipartite graph @xmath26 , @xmath740 the reason is that @xmath741 is the zero - error capacity assisted by no - signalling correlations ( theorem [ thm : cq - capacity ] ) ; while @xmath742 is the holevo ( small - error ) capacity , which is the same as the entanglement - assisted capacity for cq - channels and which is not increased by any other available no - signalling resources because of the quantum reverse shannon theorem @xcite ; and @xmath743 is the perfect simulation cost of the channel when assisted by no - signalling resources , with the choi - jamiokowski matrix @xmath744 , eq . ( [ eq : g0-equals - sigma ] ) . in eq . ( [ eq : k - chain ] ) , @xmath745 because @xmath26 is a cq - graph , so we only need to consider cq - channels @xmath746 in the minimization , for which @xmath747 letting now @xmath748 we then have the following additivity result . [ lemma : c - min - add : graph ] for any two graphs @xmath8 and @xmath749 , @xmath750 the subadditivity , @xmath751 , is evident from the definition , because if @xmath752 and @xmath753 , then @xmath754 . it remains to show the opposite inequality `` @xmath755 '' . this relies crucially on the minimax identity @xmath756 where the maximum is over probability distributions @xmath757 and the infimum is over cq - channels @xmath1 with confusability graph contained in @xmath8 . this is a special case of sion s minimax theorem @xcite , since the holevo mutual information is well - known to be concave in @xmath757 and convex in @xmath1 , while the domain of @xmath757 is the convex compact simplex of finite probability distributions and the domain of @xmath1 is an infinite - dimensional convex set . now , for a cq - channel @xmath758 with confusability graph contained in @xmath759 , and an arbitrary distribution @xmath760 of the two input variables @xmath51 and @xmath52 , we have @xmath761 here , the first term refers to the cq - channel @xmath762 while the @xmath96-th summand in the second term sum refers to the cq - channel @xmath763 note that @xmath764 is eligible for @xmath8 ( since @xmath765 implies @xmath766 for all @xmath767 , hence @xmath768 ) , while similarly for all @xmath96 , @xmath769 is eligible for @xmath749 . thus , in eq . ( [ eq : chain - rule ] ) , we can take the infimum over eligible cq - channels , to obtain @xmath770 where the minimizations are over cq - channels @xmath1 eligible for @xmath759 , @xmath771 eligible for @xmath8 and @xmath772 eligible for @xmath749 , whereas @xmath773 and @xmath774 are independent copies of @xmath51 and @xmath52 , i.e. they are jointly distributed according to @xmath775 . now , taking the maximum over distributions @xmath760 completes the proof because of the minimax formula ( [ eq : c_min : minimax ] ) . as a corollary , we get the following chain of inequalities : @xmath776 note that it may be true that @xmath777 , but to prove this we would need to show the additivity relation @xmath778 , which remains unknown . another observation is that if in the respective minimizations , the channels are restricted to classical channels , then the results of @xcite show that @xmath779 we now demonstrate by example that the rightmost inequality in ( [ eq : min - over - graphs ] ) can be strict , when quantum channels are considered . namely , for even @xmath73 let @xmath780 the complement of the hadamard graph @xmath781 , whose vertices are the vectors @xmath782 and two vectors @xmath783 are adjacent in @xmath781 if and only if they are orthogonal in the euclidean sense , @xmath784 . in other words , the cq - channel @xmath785 has confusability graph @xmath8 . since the output dimension is @xmath73 , we see from this that @xmath786 , which happens to coincide with the lovsz number , @xmath787 , hence @xmath788 . on the other hand , the clique number of @xmath8 is known to be upper bounded @xmath789 @xcite , hence @xmath790 , meaning @xmath791 . we think that also the leftmost inequality in ( [ eq : min - over - graphs ] ) can be strict . but although the pentagon @xmath792 seems to be a candidate , for which we conjecture ( based on some ad hoc calculations ) that @xmath793 , whereas @xmath794 , a rigorous proof of this has so far eluded us . whether the other two inequalities can be strict remains an open question . given a non - commutative bipartite graph @xmath26 , it is important to know when @xmath26 is able to send classical information exactly in the presence of quantum no - signalling correlations . it turns out that these channels can be precisely characterized ; we will start with cq - graphs . [ feasibility - cq ] let @xmath26 be a non - commutative bipartite cq - graph specified by a set of projections @xmath795 with supports @xmath796 . then the following are equivalent : 1 . @xmath797 ; 2 . @xmath798 ; 3 . @xmath799 . the equivalence of i ) and ii ) follows directly from proposition [ c - q - capacity - aram ] . the equivalence of ii ) and iii ) is only a simple application of the sdp of @xmath88 for bipartite cq - graphs . first , we show that iii ) implies ii ) . by contradiction , assume that the intersection of supports of @xmath82 is empty while @xmath800 . recall that the dual sdp of @xmath88 is given by @xmath801 then @xmath800 implies that we can find @xmath802 such that @xmath803 and @xmath804 for any @xmath96 . clearly @xmath805 is a density operator , and we should have @xmath806 for any @xmath96 . the only possibility is that @xmath805 is in the intersection of the supports of @xmath82 , which is a contradiction . now we turn to show that ii ) implies iii ) . again by contradiction , assume that @xmath798 while the intersection of supports is nonempty . then we can find a pure state @xmath807 from the intersection such that @xmath808 . so @xmath809 thus any feasible solution should have @xmath810 , which indeed implies that @xmath800 . [ feasibility - k ] let @xmath26 be a non - commutative bipartite graph with choi - jamiokowski projection @xmath23 , and let @xmath811 be the orthogonal complement of @xmath23 . then the following are equivalent : 1 . @xmath797 ; 2 . @xmath798 ; 3 . @xmath812 ; 4 . @xmath813 is positive definite . as a matter of fact , we have @xmath814 the meaning of i ) and ii ) are very clear , while iii ) and iv ) need some explanation . essentially , iv ) means we can find a cp map from @xmath167 to @xmath16 with choi - jamiokowski matrix @xmath815 supporting on some subset of @xmath816 . note that in the one - shot sdp formulation of @xmath46 , we need @xmath815 to be a cptp map . however , the trace - preserving condition is not necessary for asymptotic case but only @xmath817 is positive definite , which is the most nontrivial part of this theorem . \iii ) is directly equivalent to iv ) as we have @xmath818 , hence @xmath819 in the following we only focus on i ) , ii ) , and iii ) . the equivalence of ii ) and iii ) is straightforward , simply noticing that @xmath820 is a feasible solution to the primal sdp for @xmath88 , where @xmath821 . the equivalence of i ) and iii ) is much more difficult and non - trivial . in the following we want to explain a little bit more about this equivalence as there are some tricky points . first , let s see how to use iii ) to derive i ) . we can apply the standard super - dense coding protocol , and obtain a cq - channel with @xmath822 outputs @xmath823 , and the projections are given by @xmath824 , where @xmath825 are generalized pauli matrices acting on @xmath16 . so we can compute the semidefinite packing number as @xmath826 this is also the zero - error no - signalling assisted classical capacity of this cq - channel . noticing that when @xmath827 strictly holds , the right - hand side of the above equation is strictly larger than @xmath165 . the fact that i ) implies iii ) can be proven by contradiction together with the one - shot sdp formulation for @xmath46 . assume i ) holds but @xmath828 does not have full rank . then we can find a non - zero vector @xmath829 such that @xmath830 . or equivalently , @xmath831 . \i ) means for some @xmath610 we have @xmath832 . by the one - shot sdp formulation of @xmath599 , we can find positive semidefinite operators @xmath833 and @xmath834 , such that @xmath835 so we can find @xmath836 with @xmath837 , with full rank . on the other hand , we also have @xmath838 supported on @xmath839 , and the later is the summation of product terms such as @xmath840 , containing at least one factor @xmath816 each . so we have @xmath841 which immediately implies that @xmath842 is vanishing on the product vector @xmath843 , contradicting the fact that @xmath844 has full rank . the simple bound @xmath845 is very interesting , and in some important cases it is tight , such as the cq - channels with symmetric outputs , and the class of pauli channels . it would be interesting to know whether this kind of `` entanglement - assisted coding '' could provide a possible way to resolve our puzzle between @xmath76 and @xmath88 , eventually . we have shown that there is a meaningful theory of zero - error communication via quantum channels when assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations . in the terminology of non - commutative graph theory , both the one - shot zero - error classical capacity and simulation cost for non - commutative bipartite graphs assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations have been formulated into feasible sdps . the asymptotic problems for non - commutative bipartite cq - graphs have also been successfully solved , where the capacity turns out to involve a nontrivial regularization of super - multiplicative sdps , which nevertheless leads to another sdp , the semidefinite packing number . we found analogously that the zero - error simulation cost of a cq - graph is given by a semidefinite covering number , which in contrast to the classical case is in general larger than the packing number . the zero - error classical capacity of a classical graph assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations is given precisely by the celebrated lovsz number . for the most general non - commutative bipartite graphs , we are able to provide a necessary and sufficient condition for when these graphs have positive zero - error classical capacity assisted with quantum no - signalling correlations we know rather little about the asymptotic capacity and simulation cost for non - commutative bipartite graphs that are not classical - quantum , however . a very interesting candidate is the non - commutative bipartite graph @xmath846 associated with the amplitude damping channel @xmath847 , with @xmath848 , @xmath849 and @xmath850 . the extremes @xmath851 and @xmath852 correspond to the noiseless qubit channel and a constant channel , respectively , and are trivial ; we will hence assume @xmath853 . this channel is quite interesting because it gives a separation between the semidefinite packing number and the modified version , and other quantities . it is also interesting because there is only one unique channel @xmath854 which has @xmath855 as the kraus operator space . actually it is a non - unital extreme point of the convex set of cptp maps . this channel is also able to communicate classical information without error when assisted with no - signalling correlations . by applying the above super - dense coding bound , we have @xmath856 by some routine calculation , we can show that the semidefinite packing number is @xmath857 , the revised version @xmath858 , and @xmath859 where @xmath860 is the binary entropy . clearly , @xmath861 , while @xmath862 . this means that the revised semidefinite packing number can not be equal to the zero - error classical capacity assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations . whether the original form has the same problem remains unknown . there are many other interesting open problems , of which we highlight a few here . first , it would be very interesting to explore the mathematical structures of quantum no - signalling correlations in greater detail , and to characterize quantitatively how much non - locality is contained in a quantum no - signalling correlation . second , it is of great importance to solve the general asymptotic capacity and cheapest simulation problems in the zero - error setting when assisted with quantum no - signalling correlations . in particular , are there examples of strict sub - multiplicativity of @xmath573 ? the third problem of great interest is to explore the relationship between the quantum lovsz @xmath0 function introduced in ref . @xcite for a non - commutative graph @xmath863 , and the zero - error classical capacity of this non - commutative graph assisted with quantum no - signalling correlations , _ i.e. _ of kraus operator spaces @xmath26 with @xmath864 . likewise , what is the minimum simulation cost @xmath573 or @xmath865 over all such @xmath26 ? this latter is open already for a classical graph @xmath8 and cq - graphs @xmath26 with confusability graph @xmath8 , see the end of section [ sec : theta ] . in any case , it seems that @xmath866 and @xmath867 are two new interesting , multiplicative graph parameters , different from both @xmath9 and @xmath868 . fourth : are no - signalling correlations really necessary to achieve the asymptotic simulation cost @xmath78 , or is perhaps entanglement enough ? the motivation for this question comes from @xcite where it was shown that for classical channels , optimal asymptotic simulation is possible using only shared randomness , no other non - local resources are needed . a nice test case for this question is provided by cq - graphs , for which it is easy to see that @xmath869 . on the other hand , the entanglement - assisted simulation of cq - channels , also known as _ remote state preparation _ @xcite is far harder to understand . indeed , for generic channels the best known protocol requires @xmath870 bits of communication , which is the communication cost of teleportation @xcite . fifth , which no - signalling resources are actually required to achieve the asymptotic zero - error capacity @xmath76 ? this seems an innocuous question after all , for each channel the sdp @xmath871 tells us precisely which no - signalling correlation achieves the maximum . but looking at the case of classical channels and bipartite graphs @xcite , in the light of a classical result of elias @xcite , shows that there only a very specific resource is required , which is universal for all channels . namely , according to ( * ? ? ? 4 ) , a list size-@xmath455 list code for a bipartite graph @xmath359 can achieve a rate @xmath872 , which is arbitrarily close to @xmath873 for sufficiently large @xmath455 . using such a code , alice can send a message @xmath96 out of @xmath874 over @xmath73 uses of the channel , and bob will end up with a list , i.e. a subset @xmath875}$ ] of @xmath876 possible messages such that @xmath877 . to resolve the remaining ambiguity , alice and bob now require a no - signalling resource @xmath878 that we call _ subset correlation _ , defined for @xmath879 $ ] , @xmath880\choose l}$ ] , @xmath881 $ ] , with @xmath882 alice will input @xmath96 into the box , bob the set @xmath883 , and then alice will send her output @xmath884 to bob ; since @xmath877 , bob knows that he can recover the index @xmath427 of @xmath885 as @xmath886 . do these or other universal quantum no - signalling correlations allow to achieve the @xmath76 ( or at least @xmath887 for cq - graphs ) ? finally , in @xcite , the observation was made that the optimal orthogonal representation of a graph @xmath8 in the sense of lovsz ( see theorem [ thm : theta ] ) seems to satisfy @xmath888 , which was confirmed by direct calculation for several graph families . if this held in general , it would mean that @xmath9 can in a certain sense be achieved by a single channel use , rather than requiring a many - copy limit . it is a pleasure to thank many people for their interests and feedback on the present work , including salman beigi , mick bremner , eric chitambar , min - hsiu hsieh , aram harrow , masahito hayashi , richard jozsa , ching - yi lai , debbie leung , will matthews , jonathan oppenheim , xin wang , and stephanie wehner . further thanks are due to giulio chiribella , marco piani , and john watrous for delightful discussions on quantum no - signalling correlations . rd was supported in part by the australian research council ( arc ) under grant dp120103776 ( with aw ) and by the national natural science foundation of china under grants no . he was also supported in part by an arc future fellowship under grant ft120100449 . aw was supported by the european commission ( streps `` qcs '' and `` raquel '' ) , the european research council ( advanced grant `` irquat '' ) and the philip leverhulme trust . furthermore , by the spanish mineco , projects fis2008 - 01236 and fis2013 - 40627-p , with the support of feder funds , as well as the generalitat de catalunya cirit , project no . 2014 sgr 966 . c. h. bennett , i. devetak , a. w. harrow , p. w. shor , a. winter , `` the quantum reverse shannon theorem and resource tradeoffs for simulating quantum channels '' , _ ieee trans . inf . theory _ * 60*(3):2926 - 2959 ( 2014 ) ; arxiv[quant - ph]:0912.5537 . t. s. cubitt , j. chen , a. w. harrow , `` superactivation of the asymptotic zero - error classical capacity of a quantum channel '' , _ ieee trans . inf . theory _ * 57*(12):8114 - 8126 ( 2011 ) . arxiv[quant - ph]:0906.2547 . r. duan , s. severini , a. winter , `` zero - error communication via quantum channels , non - commutative graphs and a quantum lovsz number '' , _ ieee trans . inf . theory _ * 59*(2):1164 - 1174 ( 2013 ) . arxiv[quant - ph]:1002.2514 . d. leung , l. maninska , w. matthews , m. ozols , a. roy , `` entanglement can increase asymptotic rates of zero - error classical communication over classical channels '' , _ commun . phys . _ * 311*:97 - 111 ( 2012 ) . t. eggeling , d. schlingemann , r. f. werner , `` semicausal operations are semilocalizable '' , _ europhys . lett . _ * 57*(6):782 - 788 ( 2002 ) . m. piani , m. horodecki , p. horodecki , r. horodecki , `` properties of quantum nonsignaling boxes '' , _ phys . rev . a _ * 74*:012305 ( 2006 ) . m. hayashi , `` exponents of quantum fixed - length pure state source coding '' , arxiv : quant - ph/0202002 ( 2002 ) . choi , `` completely positive linear maps on complex matrices '' , _ lin . alg . appl . _ * 10*(3):285 - 290 ( 1975 ) . c. h. bennett , g. brassard , c. crpeau , r. jozsa , a. peres , w. k. wootters , `` teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein - podolsky - rosen channels '' , _ phys . * 70*(13):1895 - 1899 ( 1993 ) . Abstract:
[ "we study the one - shot zero - error classical capacity of a quantum channel assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations , and the reverse problem of exact simulation of a prescribed channel by a noiseless classical one . quantum no - signalling correlations are viewed as two - input and two - output completely positive and trace preserving maps with linear constraints enforcing that the device can not signal . both problems lead to simple semidefinite programmes ( sdps ) that depend only on the kraus operator space of the channel . in particular , we show that the zero - error classical simulation cost is precisely the conditional min - entropy of the choi - jamiokowski matrix of the given channel . the zero - error classical capacity is given by a similar - looking but different sdp ; the asymptotic zero - error classical capacity is the regularization of this sdp , and in general we do not know of any simple form . interestingly however , for the class of classical - quantum channels , we show that the asymptotic capacity is given by a much simpler sdp , which coincides with a semidefinite generalization of the fractional packing number suggested earlier by aram harrow . this finally results in an operational interpretation of the celebrated lovsz @xmath0 function of a graph as the zero - error classical capacity of the graph assisted by quantum no - signalling correlations , the first information theoretic interpretation of the lovsz number ." ]
18,451
18,451
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the stability and structure of nuclei at the upper end of the nuclear chart is a hot topic in contemporary nuclear physics . it is a challenging task to answer which heavy nuclides may exist and what properties they may have . therefore strong efforts have been made in the experimental developments as well as in the theoretical description of super - heavy elements ( she s ) . in the last decades a huge progress in the synthesis of new elements has been achieved in world leading laboratories like the gsi , darmstadt @xcite , jinr , dubna @xcite , and riken , tokyo @xcite . the first she s with @xmath2 and @xmath3 were produced in cold fusion reactions . in these experiments , involving neutron rich projectiles and spherical targets ( @xmath4pb or @xmath5bi ) , weakly excited compound nuclei were produced which cooled down by the emission of only one or two neutrons . further experimental progress in the synthesis of the heaviest elements was achieved by hot fusion reactions in which targets of deformed actinide were bombarded with the doubly - magic nucleus @xmath6ca . the compound nucleus created in this way was more excited and three or more neutrons were emitted . these reactions succeeded in the synthesis of new elements up to @xmath7 and @xmath8 @xcite . the first observation of the element 117 was possible lately @xcite using a radioactive @xmath9bk target . new possibilities for the synthesis of new isotopes will be opened in heavy ion collisions with radioactive ion beams @xcite . nowadays , many other laboratories are involved in the exploration of she s . thus the experimental groups from berkeley @xcite , ganil @xcite , livermore @xcite , jyvskyl @xcite , and oak ridge @xcite are working in this direction . they would bring in the nearest future further information on the stability and properties of the she s and an independent verification of the existing data . in a parallel way to the experimental efforts , the properties of the she s have been also investigated in various nuclear models . a proper description of trans - fermium nuclei is a great challenge for any theoretical model . usually , the parameters of the theories on atomic nuclei are adjusted to the stable isotopes and then extrapolated to the region of heavier systems . therefore many tries in different theoretical approaches are performed to foresee the stability and the structure of the heaviest nuclei . a detailed review of the theoretical analysis of she s can be found in ref . the first theoretical investigations on the stability of heavy nuclei were made in the 60 s . it was noticed that shell effects could stabilize nuclei heavier than those known at that time @xcite . calculations made in the macroscopic - microscopic model with strutinsky shell correction predicted the island of stability " . large values of shell energies were obtained at @xmath10 for prolate deformed nuclei and @xmath11 for spherical ones @xcite . in the last decades many calculations have been made providing more and more precise predictions . the fission barriers and the ground state properties were calculated using macroscopic - microscopic methods with large range of deformation parameters and nuclear shapes , including reflection and axial symmetry breaking @xcite . self - consistent methods also provided many results on fission barriers and half - lives . important results have been obtained in the relativistic mean - field ( rmf ) @xcite , the hartree - fock ( hf ) approach with skyrme forces @xcite and the hartree fock - bogoliubov ( hfb ) theory with gogny forces @xcite . the first calculations of fission barriers were performed in the axial and reflection symmetric regime but later all relevant deformations were considered in the minimization of the energy . it is well known that the liquid drop model does not predict a fission barrier in the heaviest nuclei and that the stability of the trans - fermium nuclei is achieved by the shell effects . the self - consistent quantum mechanical methods ( rmf , hf and hfb ) as microscopic theories are the perfect tools for the analysis of she s . moreover , in the self - consistent calculations all possible shapes of a nucleus are considered in the minimization process . in contrast , the most of the macroscopic - microscopic models are restricted to some pre - defined classes of deformations and only optimal shapes " @xcite allow to obtain any configuration of a nucleus . therefore they are very suitable to describe large deformations of nuclei around the scission point . a degree of freedom which plays an important role along the fission path are the pairing correlations @xcite . since in the hfb theory the particle - hole and the particle - particle matrix elements are treated on the same footing , the proper consideration of pairing along the whole fission path is guaranteed . this method has been successfully applied in many aspects of low energy nuclear physics , in particular in the description of fission barriers of heavy nuclei @xcite . another theoretical quest was to discover a semi - empirical formula describing @xmath1 emission half - lives @xcite . these investigations are very important as @xmath1 radioactivity is the dominant decay channel in many she s . the purpose of this article is to perform a systematic study of she s with respect to their stability and ground state properties in the framework of the hfb theory with the density dependent finite range gogny force and the d1s parametrization . in our analysis we include the region of the well known fermium ( fm , @xmath12 ) and nobelium ( no , @xmath13 ) elements to compare our predictions with the available experimental data . we show results for the heavier even - even nuclei rutherfordium ( rf , @xmath14 ) , seaborgium ( sg , @xmath15 ) , hassium ( hs , @xmath16 ) , darmstadtium ( ds , @xmath17 ) and copernicium ( cn , @xmath18 , which was named two years ago @xcite ) . heavier elements with @xmath19 , without given name so far , are also considered . we limit our study to @xmath20 isotopes . these nuclei are nowadays in the main stream of interest of experiments with she s . a large amount of information on nuclear structure and stability can be obtained from properties of the ground states of the she s . consequently , we start our investigation with the description of the ground state characteristics . deformations , pairing energies and two - nucleon separation energies are analyzed and collated with the single - particle energy level scheme . the ground state energies can be used to evaluate the @xmath21 values which are necessary to calculate the probability of @xmath1 emission - one of the dominant decay modes in she . a competing process to @xmath1 decay is the spontaneous fission . to analyze this mode we determine the fission barriers for all mentioned she s as a function of the quadrupole moment @xmath22 . the calculations were performed in an axial basis , although we are aware of the non - axial effects on the height of the barrier and we discuss them in a few selected cases . the impact of the octupole deformation on the potential energy along the fission path is crucial in the determination of fission barriers of she s . this is taken into account by allowing non - reflexion symmetrical shapes . the calculations were performed in a large deformed harmonic oscillator basis paying special attention to the proper optimization of the oscillator lengths and to the convergence of the calculations with the size of the basis . next , using the wkb approximation , we calculate the fission half - lives . finally , the comparison of the half - lives for @xmath1 decay and spontaneous fission allows to predict the stability of the heaviest nuclei . this article is organized as follows . in sec . ii we briefly describe the constrained hartree - fock - bogoliubov calculations . the description of the ground - state properties of she s is shown in sec . iii , fission barriers in sec . half - lives of she s are discussed in sec . v. finally , sec . vi contains a summary and some concluding remarks . in our research we will apply the self consistent hartree - fock - bogoliubov theory with the finite range density dependent gogny force . in the numerical applications we use the d1s @xcite parameterization of the gogny interaction . the d1s parameters were adjusted @xcite to give a better surface energy term ( crucial for a proper description of the fission phenomenon ) . the choice of the gogny force with the d1s parameterization is based on the fact that whenever this interaction has been used to describe low energy nuclear structure phenomena an , at least , reasonable agreement with experiment has been obtained . this degree of agreement has been obtained both for calculations at the mean field level and beyond @xcite . in the microscopic hfb calculations we have used the computer code presented in ref . @xcite , see also @xcite where special attention was paid to an accurate computation of the matrix elements of the gogny interaction for very large basis like the one used in this paper . the self - consistent equations have been solved by expanding the quasiparticle creation and annihilation operators on finite bases of axially symmetric deformed harmonic oscillator ( ho ) eigenfunctions . the size of the bases used depends upon two parameters , @xmath23 and @xmath24 , which are related to the allowed range of the ho quantum numbers through the relation @xmath25 along the perpendicular direction we take @xmath23 shells , ( i.e. @xmath26 shells depending on the value of @xmath27 . in the present study we have used @xmath28 , a value which is suited for the elongated shapes along the @xmath29 direction typical of the fission process , and @xmath30 . other parameters characterizing the ho bases are the oscillator lengths @xmath31 and @xmath32 . these two quantities have been determined , for each calculated wave function , as to minimize the hfb energy . in order to study the different paths to fission , in our calculations we have used as constraints the axial quadrupole ( @xmath22 ) and octupole ( @xmath33 ) moments , with @xmath34 . higher multipolarities are adjusted in the self - consistent process to minimize the energy . to study the impact of triaxiality effects we have also carried out calculations for a few nuclei where the axial symmetry requirement was released but the left - right symmetry was imposed . in the calculations the coulomb exchange energy has been treated in the slater approximation @xcite . additionally , the coulomb and the spin - orbit contributions to the pairing field have been neglected . finally , the two body kinetic energy correction ( 2b - kec ) is not included in the variation process because , for heavy nuclei , it remains almost constant for most of the physical configurations . as this term was included in the fitting of the force , we have to include its contribution at the end of the calculation in order to obtain reasonable binding energies . see also @xcite for a detailed discussion of the relevance of neglected or approximated terms in these calculations . we have also subtracted from the hfb energy the rotational energy corrections ( rec ) stemming from the restoration of the rotational symmetry . this correction has a considerable influence on the energy landscape ( and therefore on the height of the fission barriers ) as it is somehow proportional to the degree of symmetry breaking and therefore proportional to the quadrupole moment . a full calculation of the rec would imply an angular momentum projection @xcite which is only feasible for light nuclei . in order to estimate the rec we have followed the usual recipe @xcite of subtracting to the hfb energy the quantity @xmath35 , where @xmath36 is the fluctuation associated with the angular momentum operators in the hfb wave function and @xmath37 is the yoccoz moment of inertia @xcite . this moment of inertia has been computed using the cranking " approximation in which the full linear response matrix appearing in its expression is replaced by the zero order approximation . the effect of the cranking approximation " in the yoccoz moment of inertia was analyzed with the gogny interaction for heavy nuclei in @xcite by comparing it with the one extracted from an angular momentum projected calculation ( see also @xcite for a comparison in light nuclei ) . the conclusion is that the exact rec is a factor 0.7 smaller than the one computed with the cranking " approximation to the yoccoz moment of inertia for strongly deformed configurations ( a similar behavior has been observed for the thouless - valatin moment of inertia in @xcite ) . we have taken this phenomenological factor into account in our calculation of the rec . the evaluation of the spontaneous fission half - life is carried out in the standard wkb framework where @xmath38 is given ( in seconds ) by @xcite @xmath39 in this expression @xmath40 is the action along the @xmath22 constrained path which is given by @xmath41 @xmath42 corresponds to the @xmath22 value of the ground state and @xmath43 the @xmath22 value where the potential energy equals the one of the ground state . for the collective quadrupole inertia @xmath44 we have used the adiabatic time dependent hfb ( atdhfb ) expression computed again in the cranking " approximation and given by @xcite @xmath45 with @xmath46 here @xmath47 is the two - particle - zero - hole component of the quadrupole operator @xmath48 in the quasiparticle representation @xcite and @xmath49 are the quasiparticle energies obtained in the solution of the hfb equation . in the expression for the action the collective potential @xmath50 is given by the hfb energy ( with the 2b - kec and rec corrections ) minus the zero point energy ( zpe ) correction @xmath51 associated with the quadrupole motion . this zpe correction is given by @xmath52 where @xmath53 finally , in the expression for the action an additional parameter @xmath54 is introduced . this parameter can be taken as the hfb energy of the ( metastable ) ground state . however , it is argued that in a quantal treatment of the problem the ground state energy is given by the hfb energy plus the zero point energy associated to the collective motion . to account for this fact , the usual recipe @xcite is to add an estimation of the zero point energy to the hfb energy in order to obtain @xmath54 . in our calculations we have taken a zero point energy of 0.5 mev for all the isotopes considered . in some she s around @xmath8 a weakly oblate deformed ground state can be found . the fission path in these nuclei obviously does not go along axial symmetric shapes through the spherical configuration . such a nucleus rather takes triaxial shapes to reach the prolate saddle point with the similar absolute value of the quadrupole moment . as the energies on the triaxial part of the fission barrier are very small in comparison with the saddle point @xcite they will contribute insignificantly to the action integral . therefore we will neglect them in the calculation of half - lives . to calculate the @xmath1-decay half - lives we use the phenomenological formula of viola and seaborg @xcite @xmath55 = ( az+b)(q_{\alpha})^{-1/2 } + ( cz + d ) -7.5\ ] ] with @xmath56 the atomic number of the parent nucleus . the @xmath57-factor of the decay , @xmath58 , is obtained from the calculated ground state binding energies with the experimental value @xmath59 mev @xcite @xmath60 the constants in eq . ( [ eq : ta ] ) are : @xmath61 and @xmath62 ( taken from @xcite ) . in fig . [ fig : all_nuclide ] we present an overview of all the nuclei covered in the present work . the chosen region ranges from the heaviest trans - actinides , well known from numerous experiments , up to beyond the neutron magic shell number @xmath63 predicted by many theoretical models . the upper limit is provided by the vanishing of the two - proton separation energy . the latter approximates the proton drip line which is determined by the one - proton separation energy with some correction due to the influence of the centrifugal barrier @xcite . the region of neutron rich isotopes beyond the @xmath64-stability line ( indicated in fig . [ fig : all_nuclide ] by black squares ) has been omitted as it is out of reach for the current experimental methods and can not be produced in heavy ion collisions . as it can be seen in fig . [ fig : all_nuclide ] the experimentally known she s are located in the center of the investigated region . since we consider the ground state properties as specially relevant for the understanding of the underlying physics we present these properties in the first subsection while the following subsection is entirely devoted to the study of the fission barriers . the theoretical approach discussed in the previous section has been applied to perform a systematic study of the properties of 160 super - heavy nuclei in the region @xmath65 , @xmath66 . earlier calculations in this region have been performed in the microscopic - macroscopic approach @xcite , in the hf plus bcs with the skyrme force in the p - h channel and a monopole pairing force in the p - p channel @xcite and in the full hfb approach by @xcite with the gogny force . the calculations by berger et al . are rather similar to ours in the basic aspects . however , in our work the configuration space is larger , more appropriate for fission , and we allow more general hfb wave functions ( with more simultaneously broken symmetries ) . furthermore our study is rather detailed and systematic . to gain insight into the relevant physics of the she s we display in fig . [ fig : spe ] the single particles energies ( s.p.e . ) for the nucleus @xmath67hs in reflection symmetric configurations as a function of the quadrupole deformation @xmath68 and the quadrupole moment @xmath22 . we have chosen this nucleus as a representative of the whole region for the following reasons . since it is in the center of the area of the calculated nuclei its s.p.e . spectrum is characteristic for all she s , furthermore its proton and neutron pairing energies are small and the extraction of the s.p.e . from the hfb calculations is more reliable . the s.p.e . are obtained as usual : after solving the hfb equations the one - body hf hamiltonian is diagonalized in that basis . for the neutron system we find large spherical gaps at neutron numbers 164 , 184 and 228 ; prolate gaps at 162 and oblate gaps at 172 and 178 . in nuclei with neutron number close to 160 the spherical minimum at 164 is overwhelmed by the prolate one at 162 . for protons there are several gaps . the more relevant are the spherical ones for @xmath56 values 92 , 114 and 126 , the spherical - oblate one at 120 and the prolate ones at 104 and 108 . as we will see below many nuclear properties can be understood just by looking at these s.p.e.s . let s now discuss some ground state properties starting with the deformation parameters @xmath69 . since most of the studies on these parameters have been done in the macroscopic - microscopic models we will use a definition of the @xmath69 s in the spirit of these models . the deformation parameters @xmath69 entering in @xmath70 $ ] are determined in such a way that the multipole moments , ( @xmath71 ) , calculated with @xmath72 and the hfb self consistent ones do coincide . the deformation parameters @xmath68 of the calculated she s are given in the third column of table [ tab1 ] and they are visualized in fig . [ fig : beta]a . the quadrupole deformation parameter @xmath68 barely depends on the proton number z and decreases slowly with increasing neutron number . for all z values the nuclei with @xmath73 have a prolate deformation with @xmath74 . in the neutron number region @xmath75 , the potential energy surfaces ( pes ) @xcite of these nuclei present coexisting prolate and oblate minima . the quoted values for those nuclei are the ones corresponding to the deeper minimum . the prolate minimum is deeper in lighter nuclei with @xmath76 and @xmath77 , while the oblate one is deeper in the heavier ones . with increasing neutron number the depth of the prolate well becomes smaller compared to the oblate one with the oblate minimum becoming the lowest one around n=174 ( see also fig . [ fig : fb106 - 110 ] ) . at the same time the absolute value of the quadrupole deformation parameter of the ground state decreases from @xmath78 for @xmath79 to @xmath80 for @xmath81 . the barrier between the two wells diminishes and finally disappears at @xmath63 , where the nuclei become spherical . we also observe in this region a weak z dependency . for isotopes with @xmath82 small prolate deformation can be observed in the ground state . as compared with other calculations @xcite of she s our @xmath68 are somewhat larger but this may be connected to the slightly different methods of computation of the deformation parameters @xmath69 . in the presence of coexisting minima , one must be aware that when the restriction to axially symmetric shapes is released one of the two minima may not be a true minimum , but rather a saddle point @xcite . a clear example is the case of the heavier ds isotopes . in fig . [ fig : fb106 - 110 ] one observes two minima ( prolate and oblate ) around @xmath83 b , but looking at triaxial calculations one finds that the prolate minimum is a saddle point . the gross behavior of the deformation parameter can be qualitatively understood by looking at fig . [ fig : spe ] . here we observe that shell effects favor strong prolate deformations for the nuclei with @xmath84 and @xmath85 , i.e. , deformation driving ( down - sloping ) levels are being populated and spherical - driving ( up - sloping ) depopulated . in the region @xmath86 and @xmath87 neutron shell effects favor smaller prolate deformations while in the proton system small prolate as well as spherical shapes are favored . around @xmath79 the oblate shapes are favored while larger n values prefer smaller oblaticity . this effect is reinforced by the soft oblate proton gap at @xmath88 . the spherical shape is the privileged one by neutron shell structure at @xmath63 . this coincides with the subsequent proton spherical gaps at @xmath89 , @xmath88 , and @xmath90 which cover most of the @xmath63 isotones considered here . in columns 4 to 7 of table [ tab1 ] as well as in fig . [ fig : beta]b , c , d we present the deformation parameters of higher multipolarities . most of the nuclei are reflection symmetric in the ground states and only for nuclei with @xmath82 we obtain octupole deformed ground states independent of the proton number . mller et al . @xcite also found non - zero @xmath91 deformations for the she s in this region . the odd multipolarities @xmath92 and @xmath93 , not shown here , are different from zero only for those nuclei whose ground state is octupole deformed , however the numerical values are very small ( e.g. @xmath94 values are less than 0.009 ) . concerning the even deformations higher than two , see fig . [ fig : beta]c , d , they are different from zero only for nuclei with @xmath95 , i.e. , for all nuclei with the exception of the few isotopes around @xmath96 . as we can observe there is a smaller dependence with @xmath56 than with @xmath97 . nuclei with @xmath98 have small negative hexadecapole deformations . for increasing @xmath97 , @xmath99 increases up to @xmath100 where it reaches the largest absolute value . large negative hexadecapole moment together with large positive quadrupole moment produces barrel - like shapes in the ground state of nuclei in this region . from here on @xmath99 decreases rather smoothly up to @xmath8 where it sharply decreases to very small deformations and zero values at the largest neutron number analyzed . this sharp decrease is associated to the prolate oblate shape transition that takes place at this neutron numbers . for @xmath97-values @xmath101 , i.e. , the prolate part , there is a clear tendency with @xmath56 for a given @xmath97 : with increasing proton number @xmath99 gets larger . for the oblate - spherical part , there is almost no dependence with @xmath56 . the behavior of the deformation parameter @xmath102 is quite different from @xmath103 . for @xmath104 we obtain negative values decreasing in absolute value as @xmath97 increases . around @xmath105 , @xmath102 becomes almost zero and for @xmath106 we obtain increasing values of @xmath102 as @xmath97 increases . for @xmath107 we obtain rather small @xmath102 deformations . our results for @xmath103 and @xmath102 are rather similar to those of mller et al @xcite and sobiczewski et al @xcite . contrary to the @xmath103 and @xmath102 parameters , @xmath108 is positive in the region @xmath109 . the nuclei with @xmath110 and 166 have either zero or very small @xmath108 values . the nuclei with @xmath111 have mostly negative @xmath108 values . with the exception of the @xmath112 isotopes that have positive deformations , all the nuclei with @xmath113 have @xmath108 deformations almost zero . we have to notice that the maximal absolute values of the deformation parameters decrease with increasing multipolarity indicating a decreasing relevance . this means that higher multipolarities can be omitted in the minimization of the energy of the ground state in non - self - consistent approximations . ll ddddd ddddd dd + + & & & & & & & & & & & & & + + + + 100 & 150 & 0.329 & 0.000 & 0.003 & -0.028 & 0.005 & -4.28 & -7.31 & 7.35 & 13.20 & 8.86 & 4.04 & 13.17 + 100 & 152 & 0.331 & 0.000 & -0.009 & -0.029 & 0.007 & -3.85 & -7.69 & 7.12 & 12.32 & 9.93 & 4.97 & 14.32 + 100 & 154 & 0.332 & 0.000 & -0.021 & -0.028 & 0.010 & -5.87 & -8.29 & 7.02 & 11.35 & 10.87 & 5.39 & 12.82 + 100 & 156 & 0.329 & 0.000 & -0.032 & -0.024 & 0.011 & -6.88 & -9.26 & 6.66 & 10.77 & 11.74 & 6.98 & 7.07 + 100 & 158 & 0.321 & 0.000 & -0.044 & -0.018 & 0.011 & -7.01 & -10.66 & 6.21 & 10.35 & 12.57 & 9.15 & -0.06 + 100 & 160 & 0.310 & 0.000 & -0.056 & -0.011 & 0.009 & -5.80 & -12.25 & 5.72 & 10.01 & 13.37 & 11.81 & 0.37 + 100 & 162 & 0.300 & 0.000 & -0.069 & -0.004 & 0.008 & -0.70 & -13.67 & 5.43 & 9.50 & 14.16 & 13.55 & 0.16 + 100 & 164 & 0.285 & 0.000 & -0.071 & 0.003 & 0.005 & -6.73 & -14.36 & 5.73 & 8.41 & 14.72 & 11.75 & -3.02 + 100 & 166 & 0.267 & 0.000 & -0.074 & 0.009 & 0.001 & -9.02 & -15.28 & 5.56 & 8.02 & 15.25 & 12.75 & -6.38 + + 102 & 150 & 0.331 & 0.000 & -0.006 & -0.027 & 0.005 & -4.47 & -6.59 & 8.12 & 14.29 & 6.98 & 1.97 & 7.63 + 102 & 152 & 0.334 & 0.000 & -0.017 & -0.028 & 0.007 & -3.43 & -6.51 & 7.93 & 13.39 & 8.05 & 2.64 & 10.02 + 102 & 154 & 0.335 & 0.000 & -0.029 & -0.028 & 0.010 & -5.55 & -6.77 & 7.91 & 12.34 & 9.04 & 2.71 & 8.23 + 102 & 156 & 0.332 & 0.000 & -0.040 & -0.024 & 0.012 & -6.62 & -7.45 & 7.57 & 11.69 & 9.96 & 3.99 & 0.76 + 102 & 158 & 0.325 & 0.000 & -0.050 & -0.018 & 0.011 & -6.88 & -8.61 & 7.09 & 11.25 & 10.86 & 5.94 & 0.57 + 102 & 160 & 0.315 & 0.000 & -0.060 & -0.011 & 0.009 & -5.60 & -9.93 & 6.55 & 10.89 & 11.74 & 8.38 & 1.65 + 102 & 162 & 0.305 & 0.000 & -0.073 & -0.004 & 0.009 & -0.33 & -11.43 & 6.19 & 10.37 & 12.61 & 10.19 & 2.23 + 102 & 164 & 0.293 & 0.000 & -0.075 & 0.003 & 0.005 & -6.53 & -12.43 & 6.72 & 8.97 & 13.17 & 7.58 & -1.43 + 102 & 166 & 0.276 & 0.000 & -0.079 & 0.010 & 0.001 & -8.91 & -13.85 & 6.54 & 8.59 & 13.74 & 8.43 & -4.70 + + 104 & 150 & 0.331 & 0.000 & -0.016 & -0.025 & 0.005 & -4.85 & -4.76 & 8.91 & 15.35 & 5.10 & 0.11 & -0.41 + 104 & 152 & 0.333 & 0.000 & -0.026 & -0.026 & 0.007 & -3.35 & -4.37 & 8.78 & 14.42 & 6.13 & 0.52 & 1.85 + 104 & 154 & 0.334 & 0.000 & -0.037 & -0.025 & 0.010 & -5.63 & -4.53 & 8.85 & 13.32 & 7.11 & 0.30 & 1.77 + 104 & 156 & 0.332 & 0.000 & -0.047 & -0.021 & 0.011 & -6.78 & -5.03 & 8.52 & 12.67 & 8.09 & 1.36 & 1.90 + 104 & 158 & 0.325 & 0.000 & -0.057 & -0.016 & 0.010 & -6.92 & -5.99 & 7.98 & 12.23 & 9.07 & 3.24 & 2.03 + 104 & 160 & 0.317 & 0.000 & -0.067 & -0.010 & 0.009 & -5.39 & -7.17 & 7.40 & 11.83 & 10.01 & 5.47 & 3.86 + 104 & 162 & 0.309 & 0.000 & -0.078 & -0.004 & 0.009 & -0.06 & -8.76 & 6.99 & 11.30 & 10.94 & 7.22 & 5.36 + 104 & 164 & 0.299 & 0.000 & -0.081 & 0.004 & 0.005 & -6.28 & -9.99 & 7.75 & 9.61 & 11.58 & 4.09 & 1.11 + 104 & 166 & 0.285 & 0.000 & -0.085 & 0.011 & 0.001 & -8.87 & -11.54 & 7.54 & 9.18 & 12.17 & 4.91 & -2.64 + + 106 & 150 & 0.329 & 0.000 & -0.024 & -0.021 & 0.004 & -5.50 & -6.23 & 10.04 & 16.27 & 2.91 & -2.43 & -3.01 + 106 & 152 & 0.331 & 0.000 & -0.035 & -0.022 & 0.006 & -3.81 & -5.49 & 9.98 & 15.41 & 3.90 & -2.28 & -0.11 + 106 & 154 & 0.331 & 0.000 & -0.046 & -0.020 & 0.009 & -6.10 & -5.02 & 10.03 & 14.37 & 4.95 & -2.41 & 0.70 + 106 & 156 & 0.328 & 0.000 & -0.057 & -0.017 & 0.010 & -7.21 & -5.03 & 9.61 & 13.74 & 6.02 & -1.26 & 1.20 + 106 & 158 & 0.324 & 0.000 & -0.066 & -0.012 & 0.010 & -7.08 & -5.22 & 8.97 & 13.31 & 7.10 & 0.63 & 2.68 + 106 & 160 & 0.317 & 0.000 & -0.075 & -0.007 & 0.009 & -5.25 & -5.66 & 8.31 & 12.89 & 8.16 & 2.82 & 5.75 + 106 & 162 & 0.310 & 0.000 & -0.084 & -0.002 & 0.009 & -0.01 & -6.39 & 7.81 & 12.33 & 9.19 & 4.65 & 9.30 + 106 & 164 & 0.301 & 0.000 & -0.088 & 0.006 & 0.004 & -5.87 & -7.37 & 8.77 & 10.34 & 9.92 & 1.27 & 3.72 + 106 & 166 & 0.288 & 0.000 & -0.092 & 0.013 & 0.001 & -8.28 & -8.84 & 8.46 & 9.92 & 10.66 & 2.30 & -0.11 + 106 & 168 & 0.272 & 0.000 & -0.095 & 0.019 & -0.002 & -8.81 & -10.72 & 8.03 & 9.61 & 11.24 & 3.82 & -4.13 + 106 & 170 & 0.246 & 0.000 & -0.092 & 0.022 & -0.004 & -8.29 & -13.34 & 7.69 & 9.37 & 11.82 & 5.12 & -5.79 + 106 & 172 & 0.196 & 0.000 & -0.071 & 0.016 & -0.002 & -6.31 & -17.22 & 7.18 & 9.30 & 12.40 & 7.23 & -5.47 + + 108 & 150 & 0.324 & 0.000 & -0.029 & -0.017 & 0.004 & -6.11 & -7.61 & 11.11 & 17.08 & 0.92 & -4.45 & -5.43 + 108 & 152 & 0.327 & 0.000 & -0.041 & -0.018 & 0.006 & -4.46 & -6.01 & 11.06 & 16.32 & 1.83 & -4.34 & -2.77 + 108 & 154 & 0.327 & 0.000 & -0.054 & -0.016 & 0.008 & -6.76 & -4.49 & 11.10 & 15.37 & 2.83 & -4.43 & -0.95 + 108 & 156 & 0.325 & 0.000 & -0.065 & -0.012 & 0.009 & -7.82 & -3.47 & 10.66 & 14.81 & 3.90 & -3.38 & 0.35 + 108 & 158 & 0.321 & 0.000 & -0.075 & -0.007 & 0.009 & -7.40 & -3.05 & 10.01 & 14.39 & 4.98 & -1.71 & 2.64 + 108 & 160 & 0.316 & 0.000 & -0.083 & -0.003 & 0.009 & -5.33 & -2.89 & 9.36 & 13.96 & 6.05 & 0.14 & 6.49 + 108 & 162 & 0.310 & 0.000 & -0.092 & 0.001 & 0.008 & -0.02 & -3.04 & 8.84 & 13.41 & 7.13 & 1.76 & 12.83 + 108 & 164 & 0.300 & 0.000 & -0.096 & 0.009 & 0.004 & -5.29 & -4.26 & 10.02 & 11.15 & 7.94 & -1.74 & 5.89 + 108 & 166 & 0.290 & 0.000 & -0.100 & 0.016 & 0.000 & -7.58 & -5.88 & 9.65 & 10.71 & 8.73 & -0.71 & 2.66 + 108 & 168 & 0.276 & 0.000 & -0.103 & 0.022 & -0.003 & -8.16 & -8.10 & 9.22 & 10.35 & 9.47 & 0.56 & -1.41 + 108 & 170 & 0.250 & 0.000 & -0.098 & 0.025 & -0.004 & -7.84 & -11.26 & 8.68 & 10.15 & 10.25 & 2.29 & -3.84 + 108 & 172 & 0.195 & 0.000 & -0.071 & 0.016 & -0.002 & -6.07 & -15.49 & 8.08 & 9.97 & 10.92 & 4.40 & -3.54 + 108 & 174 & 0.170 & 0.000 & -0.070 & 0.018 & -0.003 & -3.95 & -17.17 & 7.32 & 10.06 & 11.56 & 7.45 & -4.43 + 108 & 176 & -0.162 & 0.000 & -0.022 & 0.005 & 0.002 & -4.53 & -19.62 & 6.72 & 10.02 & 11.99 & 10.21 & 6.25 + 108 & 178 & -0.146 & 0.000 & -0.031 & 0.008 & 0.006 & -0.01 & -20.36 & 6.49 & 9.82 & 12.67 & 11.37 & 14.21 + 108 & 180 & -0.090 & 0.000 & -0.024 & -0.002 & 0.001 & -3.12 & -22.30 & 6.69 & 8.94 & 13.23 & 10.36 & 5.76 + 108 & 182 & -0.060 & 0.000 & -0.030 & -0.008 & -0.001 & 0.00 & -23.23 & 6.44 & 8.63 & 13.83 & 11.63 & 14.10 + 108 & 184 & -0.037 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.00 & -23.95 & 7.06 & 7.41 & 14.28 & 8.61 & 8.40 + 108 & 186 & 0.034 & -0.062 & 0.005 & 0.000 & 0.000 & -5.76 & -23.57 & 7.00 & 7.02 & 14.50 & 8.88 & 0.68 + + 110 & 154 & 0.319 & 0.000 & -0.052 & -0.012 & 0.006 & -7.43 & -8.77 & 12.31 & 16.15 & 0.62 & -6.48 & -4.27 + 110 & 156 & 0.314 & 0.000 & -0.065 & -0.007 & 0.007 & -8.68 & -7.91 & 11.97 & 15.71 & 1.52 & -5.78 & -2.38 + 110 & 158 & 0.310 & 0.000 & -0.076 & -0.002 & 0.007 & -8.12 & -7.25 & 11.41 & 15.37 & 2.50 & -4.55 & 0.14 + 110 & 160 & 0.306 & 0.000 & -0.087 & 0.002 & 0.006 & -5.66 & -6.75 & 10.79 & 15.01 & 3.55 & -3.09 & 3.94 + 110 & 162 & 0.303 & 0.000 & -0.096 & 0.006 & 0.007 & -0.03 & -6.39 & 10.32 & 14.43 & 4.57 & -1.90 & 9.02 + 110 & 164 & 0.293 & 0.000 & -0.101 & 0.014 & 0.003 & -4.93 & -6.71 & 11.41 & 12.32 & 5.74 & -4.55 & 5.87 + 110 & 166 & 0.283 & 0.000 & -0.106 & 0.021 & -0.001 & -6.63 & -7.26 & 10.77 & 11.79 & 6.82 & -3.04 & 3.63 + 110 & 168 & 0.271 & 0.000 & -0.110 & 0.027 & -0.004 & -6.90 & -8.28 & 10.14 & 11.34 & 7.81 & -1.42 & 1.94 + 110 & 170 & 0.247 & 0.000 & -0.103 & 0.027 & -0.005 & -7.25 & -10.38 & 9.63 & 10.86 & 8.52 & 0.01 & -1.98 + 110 & 172 & 0.197 & 0.000 & -0.076 & 0.017 & -0.002 & -5.86 & -13.21 & 8.99 & 10.79 & 9.34 & 1.98 & -0.76 + 110 & 174 & 0.175 & 0.000 & -0.075 & 0.021 & -0.004 & -3.28 & -14.84 & 8.24 & 10.72 & 10.00 & 4.57 & -1.87 + 110 & 176 & -0.160 & 0.000 & -0.023 & 0.004 & 0.002 & -4.45 & -18.70 & 7.72 & 10.58 & 10.56 & 6.58 & -0.48 + 110 & 178 & -0.145 & 0.000 & -0.032 & 0.008 & 0.006 & 0.00 & -19.31 & 7.24 & 10.50 & 11.24 & 8.63 & 4.61 + 110 & 180 & -0.090 & 0.000 & -0.024 & -0.002 & 0.001 & -3.08 & -21.19 & 7.53 & 9.53 & 11.83 & 7.37 & 5.67 + 110 & 182 & -0.060 & 0.000 & -0.030 & -0.008 & -0.001 & -0.01 & -22.18 & 7.24 & 9.23 & 12.43 & 8.63 & 13.90 + 110 & 184 & 0.000 & -0.002 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.00 & -23.43 & 8.03 & 7.84 & 12.86 & 5.36 & 6.25 + 110 & 186 & 0.035 & -0.035 & 0.004 & 0.000 & 0.000 & -6.59 & -23.04 & 8.29 & 7.15 & 12.99 & 4.39 & -10.25 + + 112 & 158 & 0.297 & 0.000 & -0.076 & 0.002 & 0.004 & -8.73 & -9.36 & 12.07 & 16.32 & 0.86 & -5.43 & -2.42 + 112 & 160 & 0.295 & 0.000 & -0.088 & 0.006 & 0.005 & -6.01 & -8.62 & 11.50 & 15.94 & 1.79 & -4.18 & 1.58 + 112 & 162 & 0.294 & 0.000 & -0.098 & 0.009 & 0.005 & -0.04 & -7.98 & 11.17 & 15.34 & 2.70 & -3.41 & 6.17 + 112 & 164 & 0.283 & 0.000 & -0.103 & 0.017 & 0.001 & -4.70 & -7.77 & 12.10 & 13.50 & 3.88 & -5.50 & 4.78 + 112 & 166 & 0.273 & 0.000 & -0.109 & 0.025 & -0.002 & -6.09 & -7.78 & 11.52 & 12.90 & 4.99 & -4.23 & 3.56 + 112 & 168 & 0.262 & 0.000 & -0.113 & 0.031 & -0.005 & -6.12 & -8.13 & 10.94 & 12.37 & 6.02 & -2.86 & 2.87 + 112 & 170 & 0.253 & 0.000 & -0.114 & 0.035 & -0.007 & -6.00 & -8.62 & 10.32 & 11.96 & 7.12 & -1.27 & -0.27 + 112 & 172 & 0.211 & 0.000 & -0.087 & 0.024 & -0.004 & -5.83 & -10.26 & 9.46 & 11.72 & 8.05 & 1.19 & 2.36 + 112 & 174 & 0.191 & 0.000 & -0.086 & 0.026 & -0.005 & -1.90 & -11.45 & 8.76 & 11.49 & 8.82 & 3.46 & 3.11 + 112 & 176 & -0.157 & 0.000 & -0.023 & 0.004 & 0.002 & -4.34 & -17.21 & 8.60 & 10.88 & 9.12 & 4.01 & 8.14 + 112 & 178 & -0.144 & 0.000 & -0.032 & 0.008 & 0.006 & -0.01 & -17.75 & 8.00 & 11.18 & 9.80 & 6.25 & 16.60 + 112 & 180 & -0.088 & 0.000 & -0.023 & -0.002 & 0.001 & -3.07 & -19.53 & 8.36 & 10.14 & 10.41 & 4.88 & 7.05 + 112 & 182 & -0.060 & 0.000 & -0.030 & -0.008 & -0.001 & 0.00 & -20.57 & 8.02 & 9.87 & 11.05 & 6.17 & 15.09 + 112 & 184 & 0.000 & -0.001 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.00 & -21.93 & 8.82 & 8.43 & 11.64 & 3.25 & 7.29 + 112 & 186 & 0.052 & -0.007 & 0.005 & 0.001 & 0.001 & -7.35 & -20.94 & 9.80 & 6.86 & 11.35 & 0.18 & -8.67 + 112 & 188 & 0.015 & -0.072 & 0.004 & -0.001 & 0.000 & -11.05 & -22.03 & 8.68 & 8.27 & 12.86 & 3.73 & -8.10 + 112 & 190 & 0.028 & -0.123 & 0.011 & -0.005 & 0.000 & -10.70 & -21.64 & 9.01 & 6.43 & 13.26 & 2.62 & -14.23 + + 114 & 160 & 0.284 & 0.000 & -0.089 & 0.010 & 0.003 & -6.36 & -8.58 & 12.08 & 16.84 & 0.28 & -4.90 & -0.80 + 114 & 162 & 0.285 & 0.000 & -0.100 & 0.012 & 0.004 & -0.10 & -7.72 & 11.87 & 16.15 & 1.09 & -4.44 & 3.72 + 114 & 164 & 0.272 & 0.000 & -0.105 & 0.020 & 0.000 & -4.62 & -6.79 & 12.53 & 14.68 & 2.27 & -5.85 & 3.62 + 114 & 166 & 0.262 & 0.000 & -0.110 & 0.027 & -0.003 & -5.88 & -6.35 & 12.05 & 13.98 & 3.35 & -4.84 & 3.27 + 114 & 168 & 0.251 & 0.000 & -0.113 & 0.032 & -0.005 & -6.00 & -6.29 & 11.56 & 13.39 & 4.37 & -3.74 & 3.65 + 114 & 170 & 0.231 & 0.000 & -0.106 & 0.031 & -0.006 & -6.70 & -6.67 & 10.97 & 12.96 & 5.37 & -2.33 & 1.60 + 114 & 172 & 0.210 & 0.000 & -0.094 & 0.028 & -0.005 & -5.48 & -7.17 & 10.28 & 12.65 & 6.30 & -0.53 & 5.00 + 114 & 174 & 0.190 & 0.000 & -0.091 & 0.030 & -0.006 & -1.13 & -8.09 & 9.69 & 12.31 & 7.12 & 1.17 & 6.38 + 114 & 176 & -0.153 & 0.000 & -0.022 & 0.005 & 0.002 & -4.32 & -15.07 & 9.74 & 11.44 & 7.68 & 1.02 & 10.60 + 114 & 178 & -0.141 & 0.000 & -0.031 & 0.008 & 0.006 & -0.01 & -15.58 & 8.76 & 11.86 & 8.36 & 4.18 & 18.54 + 114 & 180 & -0.085 & 0.000 & -0.022 & -0.002 & 0.000 & -3.10 & -17.31 & 9.13 & 10.81 & 9.03 & 2.92 & 9.45 + 114 & 182 & -0.059 & 0.000 & -0.029 & -0.007 & -0.001 & -0.01 & -18.41 & 8.78 & 10.49 & 9.65 & 4.11 & 17.10 + 114 & 184 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.00 & -19.84 & 9.68 & 8.97 & 10.19 & 1.20 & 8.59 + 114 & 186 & 0.052 & -0.005 & 0.004 & 0.001 & 0.001 & -7.66 & -18.85 & 10.60 & 7.51 & 10.84 & -1.39 & -6.76 + 114 & 188 & 0.032 & -0.064 & 0.006 & 0.000 & 0.000 & -10.96 & -20.07 & 8.81 & 8.65 & 11.22 & 4.00 & -7.58 + 114 & 190 & -0.019 & -0.072 & 0.003 & -0.001 & 0.000 & -16.36 & -19.89 & 9.91 & 7.17 & 11.96 & 0.52 & -12.52 + + 116 & 164 & 0.262 & 0.000 & -0.106 & 0.023 & 0.000 & -4.71 & -3.91 & 13.12 & 15.74 & 0.50 & -6.50 & 1.17 + 116 & 166 & 0.252 & 0.000 & -0.112 & 0.030 & -0.004 & -5.81 & -2.26 & 12.76 & 15.04 & 1.56 & -5.78 & 3.84 + 116 & 168 & 0.242 & 0.000 & -0.115 & 0.035 & -0.006 & -5.83 & -1.49 & 12.32 & 14.42 & 2.59 & -4.87 & 5.14 + 116 & 170 & 0.231 & 0.000 & -0.114 & 0.037 & -0.007 & -6.02 & -1.32 & 11.74 & 13.97 & 3.60 & -3.59 & 2.78 + 116 & 172 & 0.189 & 0.000 & -0.089 & 0.027 & -0.005 & -5.08 & -4.87 & 11.20 & 13.50 & 4.45 & -2.31 & 6.02 + 116 & 174 & 0.188 & 0.000 & -0.095 & 0.033 & -0.007 & -0.44 & -4.55 & 10.67 & 13.18 & 5.32 & -0.96 & 8.01 + 116 & 176 & -0.147 & 0.000 & -0.021 & 0.005 & 0.002 & -4.30 & -12.14 & 10.66 & 12.32 & 6.20 & -0.93 & 13.72 + 116 & 178 & -0.138 & 0.000 & -0.029 & 0.008 & 0.006 & -0.01 & -12.67 & 9.55 & 12.55 & 6.89 & 2.26 & 21.11 + 116 & 180 & -0.081 & 0.000 & -0.020 & -0.002 & 0.000 & -3.17 & -14.50 & 9.90 & 11.51 & 7.59 & 1.20 & 12.61 + 116 & 182 & -0.057 & 0.000 & -0.028 & -0.007 & -0.001 & -0.01 & -15.68 & 9.57 & 11.14 & 8.24 & 2.20 & 19.87 + 116 & 184 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.00 & -17.19 & 10.51 & 9.55 & 8.82 & -0.53 & 11.02 + 116 & 186 & 0.051 & -0.008 & 0.003 & 0.001 & 0.001 & -7.91 & -16.20 & 11.31 & 8.17 & 9.48 & -2.58 & -4.28 + 116 & 188 & 0.033 & -0.039 & 0.004 & 0.000 & 0.000 & -12.40 & -17.04 & 9.89 & 8.93 & 9.76 & 1.23 & -6.10 + 116 & 190 & 0.015 & -0.078 & 0.004 & -0.002 & 0.000 & -15.32 & -18.02 & 10.38 & 8.16 & 10.75 & -0.17 & -9.85 + + 118 & 170 & 0.208 & 0.000 & -0.095 & 0.029 & -0.005 & -7.20 & -2.98 & 13.37 & 15.09 & 0.96 & -6.47 & 1.39 + 118 & 172 & 0.171 & 0.000 & -0.081 & 0.024 & -0.004 & -4.96 & -3.14 & 12.57 & 14.77 & 2.23 & -4.86 & 6.27 + 118 & 174 & 0.168 & 0.000 & -0.088 & 0.030 & -0.006 & -1.39 & -2.40 & 11.92 & 14.15 & 3.20 & -3.44 & 9.44 + 118 & 176 & -0.143 & 0.000 & -0.020 & 0.006 & 0.002 & -4.32 & -8.21 & 11.33 & 13.77 & 4.65 & -2.04 & 17.87 + 118 & 178 & -0.135 & 0.000 & -0.027 & 0.009 & 0.005 & -0.01 & -8.89 & 10.42 & 13.23 & 5.33 & 0.34 & 24.12 + 118 & 180 & -0.075 & 0.000 & -0.020 & -0.002 & 0.000 & -3.30 & -11.26 & 10.70 & 12.27 & 6.09 & -0.42 & 16.37 + 118 & 182 & -0.056 & 0.000 & -0.028 & -0.007 & -0.001 & -0.01 & -12.42 & 10.40 & 11.81 & 6.76 & 0.40 & 22.89 + 118 & 184 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.00 & -14.04 & 11.37 & 10.17 & 7.38 & -2.14 & 13.92 + 118 & 186 & 0.051 & -0.008 & 0.001 & 0.001 & 0.000 & -8.12 & -13.06 & 12.15 & 8.77 & 7.98 & -3.95 & -2.03 + 118 & 188 & 0.049 & -0.054 & 0.006 & 0.001 & 0.000 & -11.50 & -13.75 & 10.73 & 9.59 & 8.64 & -0.50 & -4.10 + 118 & 190 & 0.016 & -0.054 & 0.003 & -0.001 & 0.000 & -16.98 & -14.30 & 10.80 & 8.86 & 9.34 & -0.69 & -7.35 + + 120 & 172 & -0.176 & 0.000 & -0.002 & 0.011 & 0.000 & -3.70 & -2.47 & 12.63 & 15.84 & 0.90 & -4.46 & 12.15 + 120 & 174 & -0.154 & 0.000 & -0.010 & 0.008 & 0.001 & -5.41 & -1.89 & 12.26 & 15.14 & 1.89 & -3.65 & 15.82 + 120 & 176 & -0.138 & 0.000 & -0.018 & 0.007 & 0.003 & -4.35 & -3.44 & 11.73 & 14.68 & 2.80 & -2.43 & 19.57 + 120 & 178 & -0.130 & 0.000 & -0.025 & 0.009 & 0.005 & -0.01 & -4.81 & 11.53 & 13.97 & 3.54 & -1.95 & 24.62 + 120 & 180 & -0.066 & 0.000 & -0.019 & -0.003 & 0.000 & -3.56 & -7.97 & 11.60 & 13.16 & 4.43 & -2.12 & 19.80 + 120 & 182 & -0.055 & 0.000 & -0.029 & -0.008 & -0.001 & -0.01 & -8.83 & 11.29 & 12.58 & 5.20 & -1.36 & 25.60 + 120 & 184 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.00 & -10.57 & 12.30 & 10.80 & 5.83 & -3.74 & 16.29 + 120 & 186 & 0.050 & -0.012 & 0.001 & 0.001 & 0.000 & -8.16 & -9.69 & 13.05 & 9.42 & 6.48 & -5.33 & 0.27 + 120 & 188 & 0.048 & -0.059 & 0.005 & 0.001 & 0.000 & -11.37 & -10.34 & 11.57 & 10.25 & 7.14 & -2.05 & -1.88 + 120 & 190 & 0.016 & -0.052 & 0.002 & 0.000 & 0.000 & -17.16 & -10.62 & 11.61 & 9.55 & 7.83 & -2.15 & -5.01 + + 122 & 176 & -0.109 & 0.000 & -0.020 & 0.002 & 0.002 & -5.35 & -4.68 & 13.02 & 15.62 & 0.60 & -4.75 & 17.54 + 122 & 178 & -0.109 & 0.000 & -0.024 & 0.004 & 0.003 & -1.11 & -4.56 & 12.93 & 14.77 & 1.40 & -4.56 & 19.76 + 122 & 180 & -0.062 & 0.000 & -0.023 & -0.004 & 0.000 & -3.62 & -4.98 & 12.50 & 14.40 & 2.64 & -3.64 & 21.94 + 122 & 182 & -0.055 & 0.000 & -0.031 & -0.008 & -0.001 & 0.00 & -5.24 & 12.27 & 13.39 & 3.45 & -3.13 & 28.05 + 122 & 184 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.00 & -7.19 & 13.33 & 11.52 & 4.17 & -5.38 & 18.02 + 122 & 186 & 0.049 & -0.036 & 0.000 & 0.001 & 0.000 & -7.63 & -6.64 & 13.52 & 10.61 & 5.36 & -5.76 & 3.69 + 122 & 188 & 0.031 & -0.059 & 0.002 & 0.001 & 0.000 & -11.75 & -7.17 & 12.10 & 10.84 & 5.95 & -2.74 & 1.10 + 122 & 190 & 0.015 & -0.068 & 0.002 & 0.000 & 0.000 & -16.17 & -7.55 & 12.47 & 9.88 & 6.28 & -3.58 & -3.44 + + 124 & 180 & -0.065 & 0.000 & -0.028 & -0.006 & 0.000 & -3.44 & -1.51 & 13.59 & 15.21 & 0.31 & -5.40 & 20.40 + 124 & 182 & -0.058 & 0.000 & -0.033 & -0.010 & -0.001 & 0.00 & -1.15 & 13.76 & 14.23 & 1.15 & -5.73 & 29.94 + 124 & 184 & 0.000 & -0.001 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.000 & 0.00 & -4.30 & 14.62 & 12.53 & 2.16 & -7.32 & 17.90 + 124 & 186 & 0.032 & -0.050 & 0.001 & 0.002 & 0.000 & -6.81 & -4.27 & 13.95 & 12.19 & 3.74 & -6.09 & 9.63 + 124 & 188 & 0.015 & -0.068 & 0.002 & 0.002 & 0.000 & -11.72 & -4.48 & 13.55 & 11.01 & 3.91 & -5.32 & 2.93 + 124 & 190 & -0.002 & -0.078 & 0.002 & 0.001 & 0.000 & -16.02 & -4.73 & 14.21 & 10.18 & 4.21 & -6.58 & -2.94 + + 126 & 186 & 0.015 & -0.073 & 0.001 & 0.003 & 0.000 & -6.38 & -1.22 & 15.04 & 13.53 & 1.07 & -7.59 & 9.82 + 126 & 188 & -0.002 & -0.086 & 0.002 & 0.004 & 0.000 & -11.40 & -1.03 & 16.13 & 11.10 & 1.16 & -9.37 & 1.03 + 126 & 190 & 0.011 & -0.121 & 0.003 & 0.004 & 0.000 & -13.12 & -0.48 & 16.05 & 11.09 & 2.07 & -9.25 & -4.06 + + ( color online ) ground state proton and neutron pairing energies for super - heavy nuclei . ] in the hfb approach @xcite , the pairing energy is given by @xmath114 with @xmath115 the pairing field and @xmath116 the pairing tensor . the neutron pairing energies of each nucleus are given in the eighth column of table [ tab1 ] and in the upper panel of fig . [ fig : pair ] . the general behavior of these results can be easily understood by looking again at fig . [ fig : spe ] . we know that small pairing energies correspond to situations of low level density of the neutron s.p.e in particular we expect zero neutron pairing energies at @xmath117 and 184 . notice that the fact that for @xmath105 the pairing energies are zero is consistent with the prolate deformation of these nuclei and for @xmath112 with the oblate one . for @xmath81 and 184 we have spherical nuclei . appropriate neutron shell gaps can be found in fig . [ fig : spe ] for the mentioned cases . for the same reason large pairing energies are associated with high level density , for example , we find large pairing energies for @xmath118 and 190 . we observe that the general pattern , qualitatively , does not depend on the proton number . the proton pairing energies are given in the ninth column of table [ tab1 ] and the lower panel of fig . [ fig : pair ] . in this case the general pattern looks more complicated . for the same proton number some nuclei are prolate , some oblate and some spherical and therefore only part of them fit to the proton shell gaps in fig . [ fig : spe ] . again the small pairing energies found at @xmath56 values 104 , 108 , 116 , 120 and 126 have to do with the low proton level density found in fig . [ fig : spe ] for those proton number . concerning the behavior for the different isotopes , for example for @xmath119 , from @xmath120 up to @xmath121 we have proton pairing energies around @xmath122 mev and from @xmath8 on around @xmath123 mev . the reason for this change is that in the first interval the nuclei are prolate and in the second either oblate or spherical . similar arguments apply for other cases . it is interesting to notice that with the exception of the few nuclei with @xmath124 none of the nuclei studied has absolute values of the neutron pairing energies larger than 9 mev . on the other hand , many of the analyzed nuclei have proton pairing energies much larger than 10 mev . ( color online ) @xmath21 values , theoretical values marked by dots are compared with experimental data @xcite . the different lines correspond to the indicated isotope ] in fig . [ fig : qalpha ] the @xmath58 values are plotted as a function of the neutron number [ see eq . ( [ eq : qalpha ] ) ] . the exact numerical values are also given in column 10 of table [ tab1 ] . the patterns displayed by the different isotopes are easily understood just looking at eq . ( [ eq : qalpha ] ) : minima appear when the mother nucleus are more bound than the average and maxima correspond to more bound daughter nuclei . thus we observe minima corresponding to the neutron numbers for which energy gaps appear in the single particle energies of fig . [ fig : spe ] , namely 162 , 178 and 182 - 184 . for the @xmath125 values @xmath126 and @xmath127 there is no structure because the energy gaps that one finds for these neutron numbers are not large enough to provide energy minima at those deformations , see column three of table [ tab1 ] . experimental values @xcite for some isotopes of the nuclei fm , no , rf , sg , hs , ds , 114 116 and 120 are also displayed in the figure . the agreement between theory and experiment is very satisfactory , in most of the cases we obtain a quantitative agreement and for the others at least the tendency is the right one . concerning the proton dependence we observe a similar situation , we find large energy spacing for the lines whose z numbers correspond to energy gaps in the single particle diagram of fig . [ fig : spe ] , for example , hs , 116 , 120 , etc . ( color online ) top panel : two neutron separation energies as a function of the neutron number . lower panel : two proton separation energies as a function of the proton number . the lines represent isotonic chains , the one at the lower left corner corresponds to n=150 , and the one closer to the upper right corner to a=190 . experimental data are taken from ref . ] in fig . [ fig : s2n ] , upper panel , we present the 2-neutron separation energy as a function of the neutron number ( see also column 11 of table [ tab1 ] ) . as expected we obtain a decreasing behavior of @xmath128 with increasing neutron number since we get closer to the neutron drip line . the smooth decline of @xmath128 is only disturbed at the neutron numbers corresponding to the single particle shell gaps 162 , 184 , etc . the two - proton separation energies are shown , in the lower panel of fig . [ fig : s2n ] , as a function of the proton number ( see also column 12 of table [ tab1 ] ) . the general behavior of decreasing @xmath129 for a given isotonic chain with growing z illustrates the fact that we are getting closer to the proton drip line . the fact that the @xmath129 presents less structure than the @xmath128 is obviously related with the fact that , in the region of interest , the shell gaps in fig . [ fig : spe ] are smaller for protons than for neutrons . [ fig : s2n ] also includes the available experimental values for some fm and no isotopes . we observe that in the case of @xmath128 the theoretical values are a around 1 mev smaller as compared to experiment while in the case of @xmath129 they are around 1 mev larger . in both cases , however , the trend is correctly described . this is the well known binding energy drift that takes place with the d1s parametrization of the gogny force for most isotopic chains . to correct this drift chappert et al @xcite have recently done a new parametrization of the gogny force , the d1n , which reduces considerably the drift but otherwise keeps the quality of the d1s parametrization . in table [ tab : d1snm ] we have included calculations with the d1n parametrization and we observe a considerable improvement in the agreement . we also include in the table the results of calculations with the d1 m parametrization of the gogny force obtained by including beyond mean field effects in the fit @xcite , which also do not present the mentioned drift . lldddd & @xmath97 & d1s & d1n & d1 m & exp + & 150 & 13.20 & 13.86 & 14.00 & 13.98 + & 152 & 12.32 & 13.01 & 13.14 & 13.40 + & 154 & 11.35 & 12.13 & 12.23 & 12.06 + & 156 & 10.77 & 11.64 & 11.73 & 11.56 + & 150 & 8.86 & 7.80 & 7.62 & 7.74 + & 152 & 9.93 & 8.79 & 8.59 & 8.93 + & 154 & 10.87 & 9.67 & 9.47 & 9.71 + & 156 & 11.74 & 10.50 & 10.31 & 10.43 + & 150 & 7.35 & 7.66 & 7.70 & 7.56 + & 152 & 7.12 & 7.49 & 7.54 & 7.15 + & 154 & 7.02 & 7.38 & 7.48 & 7.31 + & 156 & 6.66 & 6.99 & 7.10 & 7.03 + the d1n and d1 m parametrizations also improve slightly the agreement of @xmath21 with the experiment ( see table [ tab : d1snm ] ) , but this effect is much less pronounced than in the case of the separation energies as the influence of protons and neutrons cancel each other . the large size basis used in these calculations and the large number of nuclei studied prevents to make a systematic study with totally unrestricted symmetry - breaking wave functions . to clarify the effects of these restrictions we show in fig . [ 8panel3 ] , as an example , the behavior of several relevant quantities along the fission path for the nuclei @xmath130hs ( left panel ) , @xmath131ds ( middle panel ) and @xmath132cn ( right panel ) in different approximations . the panels ( d ) , in the middle row of fig . [ 8panel3 ] , display three different fission paths for each nucleus corresponding to the following constraints on the wave functions : 1.- the axially symmetric ( @xmath133 ) and reflexion symmetric ( @xmath134 ) fission path ( continuous line ) , which we shall call in the following as - rs path . 2.- the axially symmetric and non - reflexion symmetric ( @xmath135 ) path ( long - dashed lines ) , in the following as - nrs path . 3.- the non - axially symmetric ( @xmath136 ) and reflexion symmetric path ( short - dashed lines ) , in the following nas - rs path . in the ground state these nuclei are well quadrupole deformed , @xmath137 b , see panels ( d ) , and in the way to fission they have to tunnel through a barrier of several mev height . the barriers represent the potential energy needed to deform the nucleus . it is related , therefore , with the single particle levels around the fermi surface available at the corresponding deformation along the path . for the three nuclei the paths in the as - rs case present two hump barriers where the height of the second barrier decreases with the mass number while the first one remains more or less constant for @xmath130hs , @xmath131ds and increases for @xmath132cn . the width of the barrier in this approach is also similar for the three nuclei . the origin of the two humps can be easily understood looking at the single particle energies of fig . [ fig : spe ] . if we follow the neutron fermi level to the prolate side we find two regions with a clearly developed low level density . the first one at @xmath138 b with the shell gaps n=162 and z=108 corresponds to the ground state minimum . on the way from this point to larger deformations we find a larger level density region which corresponds to the energy increase of the first barrier . behind that we arrive at the second region at @xmath139 b , which corresponds to the super deformed minimum . at even larger deformations one finds a high level density region that provides the energy rise of the second barrier . finally above @xmath140 b , we observe intruder states of a high lying @xmath141i@xmath142 orbital which could be an indication of the scission point . incidentally , since the neutron shell gap is at n=162 and the proton one at z=112 the super - deformed minimum is deeper in @xmath132cn than in the lighter nuclei displayed in fig . [ 8panel3 ] . this behavior changes remarkably in the as - nrs approach . one can follow in panels ( f ) the portion of the paths where a lower solution with @xmath143 is found . as one can see in panels ( f ) the octupole degree of freedom plays an important role for quadrupole deformations starting around @xmath144 b , i.e. , close to the super deformed minima . as a matter of fact in this channel the second hump of the barriers diminishes strongly and the paths in this region look like the continuation of the first hump . the as - nrs path reaches up to large deformations , @xmath145 b for @xmath130hs , @xmath146 b for @xmath131ds and decreases to @xmath147 b for @xmath132cn . we can understand the onset of octupole deformation looking again at fig . [ fig : spe ] . here we observe that the @xmath148 and @xmath149 levels of the @xmath141k@xmath150 shell cross the fermi surface around 26 b , while the @xmath151 level crosses around 35 b. interestingly , at these @xmath22 values the @xmath151 level of the @xmath141h@xmath152 orbit also approaches the fermi surface . in fig . [ fig : spe ] and at zero deformations the @xmath141k@xmath150 subshell lies at about 0.4 mev and the @xmath141h@xmath152 at about @xmath153 mev . the k@xmath150 and h@xmath152 subshells interact strongly through the @xmath154 , i.e. , the octupole interaction . that means if we allow for reflexion symmetry breaking we can increase the quadrupole deformation at a lower energy cost @xcite . we can observe in fig . [ 8panel3 ] that around these values the as - nrs fission paths get lower in energy than the as - rs ones . in the ( g ) panels we can follow the behavior of the hexadecapole moment along the fission path . in the ground state it is close to zero in both approximations and from this point on it grows linearly with @xmath22 in the as - nrs approach . in the as - rs approach , however , first it increases linearly up to the scission point where a kink is observed followed by a linear increase . in the nas - rs path we can observe the effect of the triaxial shapes along the fission paths . in panels ( e ) we can see the two portions of the trajectory where triaxial solutions are found . the first one , close to the ground state , spans a smaller interval of @xmath22 values than the second one and does not have a large impact on the energy . the second one , as in the as - nrs case , is relevant around the second hump causing a significant lowering of its height , i.e. , in this case we still have to deal with two humped barriers . the width of the barrier , at variance with the as - nrs case , is more or less like the as - rs one . though the shape of the barriers is very relevant to calculate lifetimes one has to consider , however , that other quantities entering in the corresponding formula , eqs . ( [ tsf ] ) and ( [ action ] ) , do play an important role . a relevant parameter is the collective quadrupole inertia @xmath44 , since mass parameters are strongly influenced by pairing correlations and these itself by the single particle level density which we expect to vary along the different fission paths . in panels ( a ) and ( b ) of fig . [ 8panel3 ] we display the neutron and protons pairing energies , respectively . we indeed observe big differences in both of them along the portions of the paths where the symmetry breaking takes place . in particular we observe that the as - rs solutions provide always the largest pairing energies . as we can observe in panels ( c ) , where the @xmath44 s are plotted in the different approaches , in the relevant parts the as - rs provides the smaller masses followed by the as - nrs ones . this implies , that not necessarily the smallest fission barriers provide the shortest lifetimes @xcite . since the action @xmath40 in eq . ( [ action ] ) can be seen as a line integral of the function @xmath155 , the area of the surface delimited by this line and the x - axis provides the value of the action @xmath40 . in panel ( h ) we display @xmath156 in the three approaches . for the nucleus @xmath130hs we find that though the nas - rs fission path has a smaller fission barrier than the as - rs , the actions @xmath40 for both approaches are very close . the actual values of @xmath40 are 26.69 ( as - rs ) and 26.49 ( nas - rs ) , while in the as - nrs case we obtain a much larger value , namely 41.66 . in the nucleus @xmath131ds , the fission paths alone would predict that the as - nrs and the nas - rs approaches would provide much shorter lifetimes than the as - rs one . however , in panel ( h ) one finds that the three areas look rather similar . actually the precise numbers 25.88 ( as - rs ) , 26.97 ( as - nrs ) and 26.49 ( nas - rs ) show this to be the case . lastly , for @xmath132cn , the prediction of the fission paths is more or less in accordance with the one of panel ( h ) and the actual numbers 23.34 ( as - rs ) , 18.32 ( as - nrs ) and 22.52 ( nas - rs ) corroborate that . we can conclude that the restriction to axially symmetric paths is , in general , a good approximation , though as we we will see later one can find some exceptions . the low and short nrs barrier in nuclei with @xmath157 makes the most probable fission through octupole deformed shapes . in these nuclei we expect to find asymmetric mass distribution of fission fragments @xcite . in the one dimensional fission paths plotted in fig . [ 8panel3 ] we find crossings between the two paths giving the impression that one could switch from one path to the other without further problem . however , if we look in a higher dimensional plot one can see that this is not the case . to illustrate this point we have drawn in fig . [ q2-q3 ] potential energy contour lines versus the quadrupole , @xmath22 , and the octupole moment , @xmath33 , for the nuclei @xmath130hs and @xmath132cn . in this figure we can follow the as - rs and the as - nrs paths of fig . [ 8panel3 ] for the respective nucleus . the as - rs path corresponds to @xmath158 and goes along the x - axis and the as - nrs one goes along the bullets . it is interesting to see how the self - consistent path goes along a valley in both nuclei . we can also see that no alternative paths are present . in the @xmath130hs case we find that , at @xmath159 b where both paths seem to cross in fig . [ 8panel3](d ) , in reality both paths are separated by a 4 to 5 mev high barrier . in the following to perform a systematic description of the fission barriers of the 160 she s , we restrict ourselves to the axial approximation in which we have performed two kinds of calculations , namely the reflexion symmetric , as - rs , and the non - reflexion symmetric , as - nrs . all the fission barriers are presented in the series of figures [ fig : fb100 - 104]-[fig : fb124 - 126 ] . in fig . [ fig : fb100 - 104 ] we present the fission barriers for the isotopes of the elements fm , no and rf for quadrupole values from @xmath123 b up to @xmath160 b ( continuous line for as - rs and dashed for as - nrs ) . we first discuss the as - rs results . in panel ( a ) we present the fm results for neutron number 150 up to 166 . all isotopes present a well prolate deformed minimum around 15 b. in addition in the lighter isotopes a shallow superdeformed ( sd ) minimum appears around 50 b , at @xmath161 we find a very flat minimum and for the heavier isotopes no sd minimum is found . the common characteristic of these nuclei is the presence of a big broad barrier . for @xmath162 the barrier is centered at @xmath163 b , has a height of about 12 mev and a width of 18 b. with increasing neutron number the center of the barrier shifts to larger deformations and the height diminishes . for @xmath164 the center is around @xmath165 b and the height is about 8 mev . in the heavier isotopes we find some structure in the first barrier , namely the development of a shoulder around @xmath166 b with increasing neutron number . the presence of a sd minimum in the lighter isotopes drives the existence of a second barrier . since the minima are rather shallow the second barriers are broad but not high . these properties will contribute in general to a tendency of shorter lifetimes with increasing neutron number , though the particular behavior must be analyzed case by case . the fission paths for the no isotopes are shown in panel ( b ) for the same neutron numbers as the fm case . the structure of the first barriers look roughly like the ones in fm . an important point is the fact that the sd minimum is somewhat lower in energy than in the fm case and its role is therefore much less relevant . the results for the rf isotopes are displayed in panel ( c ) . the tendency observed in the no isotopes is reinforced , the sd minimum gets even deeper and the second barrier disappears for most isotopes . this fact will provide in general shorter lifetimes for rf than for no and for no shorter than for fm . these are general tendencies but since the lifetimes are very sensitive to small energy differences along the fission path , to make quantitative predictions calculations involving also collective inertia have to be performed . let us now describe the as - nrs results . for all isotopes of the three elements , the fission barriers are much larger along the non - reflexion symmetric paths than along the reflexion symmetric path . the lifetimes are therefore considerably longer in the as - nrs path than in the as - rs one . the fission in the as - nrs mode is completely impossible . an exhaustive discussion of the fission barriers of the nuclei @xmath167fm , @xmath168fm , @xmath169fm , @xmath169no , and @xmath170rf can be found in ref . @xcite . in these nuclei the elongated fission " mode can be observed . this mode is connected to octupole deformed fission paths which start at @xmath171 b. we have not observed the elongated fission " in heavier nuclei therefore we will not discuss it here . in fig . [ fig : fb106 - 110 ] we present the paths for the nuclei of sg , hs and ds elements . in panel ( a ) we display the results from @xmath162 up to @xmath121 for the sg isotopes . these nuclei have a trend somewhat different from the preceding ones : the sd minimum does not play a relevant role in the fission process since it is always deeper than the ground state and as a matter of fact if the sd minimum were not that shallow it would be the ground state for the lightest sg isotopes . furthermore the barriers get flatter , most of them being lower than 10 mev . apart from this feature the situation for the isotopes @xmath172 is similar to the nuclei fm , no and rf , i.e. , the ground states are prolate deformed ( @xmath173 b ) with large negative deformation energies and high barriers at larger @xmath22 values . for @xmath174 the situation changes very fast , and the following properties get reinforced as the neutron number increases : the ground states get less deformed , the shoulders around @xmath175 b get deeper and become real minima and as a consequence the original barrier becomes a two humped one . the height of the spherical maximum decreases and a coexisting oblate minimum develops at @xmath176 b. in particular for @xmath79 the oblate and prolate minima are degenerated . we therefore expect a strong reduction in the fission lifetime of heavier isotopes as compared to the lighter ones . in panel ( b ) the @xmath162 up to @xmath177 hs isotopes are shown . in the lighter isotopes the fission barriers are flatter and the sd minima deeper than in the corresponding sg isotones . the effect of the sd minima on the fission process is much smaller . furthermore the second fission barrier develops much earlier . since the single particle energies of fig . [ fig : spe ] are for @xmath67hs we can confront the general discussion of sect . [ sect : iva ] with the shape of the fission path in this nucleus . aside from these facts the hs isotopes from @xmath178 up to @xmath179 behave to a large extend like the corresponding isotones of the sg isotopes . for @xmath8 the oblate minimum becomes the ground state and the two humps of the fission barrier are very similar in size and height ( about 5 mev ) . with increasing number of neutrons , the prolate minimum shifts towards @xmath180 and the spherical minimum becomes the ground state at the @xmath63 shell closure . as a consequence the two humps separate from each other , the outer one shifting to larger @xmath22 values and the inner one to smaller ones . at the same time the inner barrier gets bigger and the outer smaller . from this behavior one expects the lifetimes for fission to be smaller around neutron number 170 - 174 . the nucleus @xmath181hs is octupole deformed in its ground state , see fig . [ fig : beta ] . in the self - consistent @xmath22-constrained calculations this nucleus remains weakly octupole deformed up to @xmath182 b where it turns reflexion symmetric ( see short dashed part of the fission path ) . since the fission fragments at the scission point are characteristic of a reflexion symmetric fission we still denote this mode as rs fission . the same situation is found with the @xmath82 isotones for the heavier she . the paths along @xmath183 close to the ground state are plotted with short dash lines in the corresponding figures . the ds results for the isotopes @xmath184 up to @xmath185 are displayed in panel ( c ) . the main characteristics of these fission paths are the following : for the lighter isotopes the fission barriers are flatter than for the corresponding isotones in hs and sg . for the light and medium mass isotopes , for a given isotone number , we find an increase of the first barrier moving from sg to hs and from this to ds . the opposite effect is observed for the second barrier , in particular for the very heavy isotopes this barrier disappears at the highest neutron number studied . concerning the as - nrs results of fig . [ fig : fb106 - 110 ] and for the sg isotopes , we find that though the as - nrs fission barriers are smaller than the as - rs ones for medium @xmath22 values , for larger ones they are much higher and as a result the non - reflexion symmetric fission paths are not favored as compared with the reflexion symmetric ones . for the hs isotopes the same behavior as the sg isotopes is observed : for lighter isotopes up - bending tails of the fission paths make the as - nrs paths very unfavored , but for medium - heavy n values the tails bend down and though the path is longer the second barrier is smaller for the as - nrs path than for the as - rs one , i.e. , around @xmath186 and above the as - nrs path may compete with the as - rs one ( cf . [ q2-q3 ] ) . for the heaviest hs isotopes in the as - rs approach the second barrier decreases considerably and the as - nrs barrier becomes longer than the other one . for the ds isotopes the as - nrs path is even more favorable because the down - bending tendency gets reinforced and we have some as - nrs paths which are clearly favored , for example for the nuclei with @xmath187 . for larger n values the vanishing of the second barrier in the as - rs case again favors this approach . notice that in general octupole effects set in for larger @xmath22 values as the neutron number increases . in fig . [ fig : fb112 - 116 ] we present the fission paths for the isotopes of the elements cn and @xmath89 and 116 . as before we first discuss the as - rs paths . in panel ( a ) , where the isotopes @xmath188 of cn are shown , we observe that compared with the corresponding isotones discussed before , the second hump of the barriers is lower and that the slopes of the tails of the fission paths are more pronounced . these facts point to shorter lifetimes of the cn isotopes as compared with lighter isotones . in panel ( b ) of the figure the @xmath89 isotopes are shown . the main difference with respect to the cn isotopes is the increase of the first hump and the decrease of the second one . in the isotopes with one hump barriers these are higher and a bit broader than for the corresponding isotones in cn . altogether , it seems that , in general , the lifetimes of the @xmath89 isotopes will be somewhat longer than the one at the corresponding @xmath119 isotones . in panel ( c ) we display the @xmath189 isotopes . here the same trend as in the previous nuclei is observed : a reinforcement of the tendency to increase the first hump of the double humped barriers and in the case of only one hump an increase of this . concerning the as - nrs results for cn and the @xmath89 and 116 elements , we find that the onset of octupolarity is energetically favored after the level crossing of the higher shells " and with the exception of the lightest isotopes the barriers are much smaller in the as - nrs path . this is due to the disappearance of the second hump of the barrier , i.e. , in the as - nrs path we have only one - humped barriers . we expect therefore a shortening of the fission lifetimes along these paths . in fig . [ fig : fb118 - 122 ] the results for the @xmath190 and 122 isotopes is shown . the same tendency as before is observed in the as - rs calculations , larger first barriers as @xmath56 increases . the role of the octupole degree of freedom is also relevant and all as - nrs fission paths do have smaller fission barriers . the same comments do also apply to the @xmath191 and 126 isotopes in fig . [ fig : fb124 - 126 ] . ( color online ) the dominant decay modes of she s . logarithm of the shortest half - lives ( in s ) is also indicated . ] one of the key issues in the theoretical description is the prediction of the decay modes and the half - lives of the she s . the agreement between the experimental data and the theoretical predictions states not only the quality of both of them but it may be also a criterion for the identification of a particular isotope synthesized in the corresponding fusion reaction . moreover , since the contemporary experimental techniques do not allow the detection of nuclei with half - lives shorter than @xmath192s one must estimate which isotopes can survive long enough to be detected and the way in which they disintegrates . therefore , the half - lives of the two main competing processes , spontaneous fission and @xmath1 emission , should be evaluated . the shortest half - life determines the dominant decay channel and the total half - life . if the branching ratio between two modes is equal to 50 % the logarithm of the total half - life would be smaller than the shorter partial half - life by not more than 0.3 . differences in half - lives between two modes of one order of magnitude lead to a logarithm of the total half - life only 0.05 smaller than the logarithm of the half - life of the fastest decay . the half - lives for @xmath1 decay and spontaneous fission calculated in the hfb theory are collected in the last two columns of table [ tab1 ] . for an easier analysis these data are also presented in fig . [ fig : t1/2 ] where the isotopic chain of each element is shown in a separate panel . in some nuclei two fission half - lives can be calculated along paths leading to distinct fragment mass asymmetry . both solutions are depicted in fig . [ fig : t1/2 ] and discussed below , however , in table i only the shorter half - life of the dominant mode is given . the available experimental data are also plotted in fig . [ fig : t1/2 ] . a first look into the panels of fig . [ fig : t1/2 ] reveals similar tendencies for the different isotopic chains . it is easy to distinguish the intervals of neutron number where common features are characteristic for many elements despite of differences in the absolute values . therefore we will discuss our results collected in groups of similar neutron number starting from the lighter ones . as we have seen in the discussion of the precedent section nrs effects influence the fission paths , and thereby the fission half - lives , in three @xmath22 regions : 1.- for small @xmath22 values , @xmath193 b , they affect nuclei with octupole deformed ground states , i.e. nuclei with @xmath194 . 2.- starting at medium ( @xmath195 b ) and extending up to large @xmath22 values , these effects are present in all nuclei . 3.- for larger @xmath22 values , @xmath196 b , they appear in the light isotopes of the elements fm , no , rf and sg . according to these effects we are using three symbols in fig . [ fig : t1/2 ] for the fission half - lives depending on the paths used in the calculations : as - rs ( triangle - up ) includes the genuine as - rs ones plus those with octupole effects close to the ground state . the reason to include the latter under a `` as - rs '' denomination is that at @xmath197 b the nucleus takes as - rs shape and the fission takes place exactly in the same way as in the pure as - rs case with symmetric fragment mass distribution . as - nrs ( triangle - down ) denotes the real " nrs paths leading to fission with fragments of different masses , which correspond to the long dashed lines in the fission barrier plots . as - rs / nrs ( star ) labels the paths where the first part is as - rs and only for @xmath196 b one follows the nas branch . the first characteristic region covers the lighter isotopes with @xmath198 , clearly delimited by the @xmath105 deformed `` shell closure '' . in this range of @xmath97 the half - lives for @xmath1 emission increase monotonically with the neutron number in all elements from fm to @xmath89 . it can be also noticed that an increase of the proton number by two units leads to the decrease of the @xmath1 half - lives by two or three orders of magnitude . as we will also see for the other regions , this tendency is a direct consequence of the calculated values of @xmath21 shown in fig . [ fig : qalpha ] and is consistent with well - known properties of @xmath1 decay in heavy nuclei . the three lightest fm and no isotopes are a specific group of nuclei in which the hfb calculations predict relatively long fission half - lives . the small fission probability is the consequence of the shape of the fission barrier in these nuclei which extends to large quadrupole deformation . in the as - rs path the second barrier extends up to 120 b providing very long half - lives . a somewhat shorter half - life is obtained in the as - nrs approach where the barrier is constructed from two humps : the first a rs and the second a nrs one starting at @xmath199 b ( fig . [ fig : fb100 - 104 ] ) . in the slightly heavier isotopes the second nrs barrier also can be noticed in the pes ( fig . [ fig : fb106 - 110 ] ) , but in contrast to the group of lighter fm and no nuclei the second , super deformed minimum has an energy below the ground state . thus the second hump does not affect the barrier tunneling but it governs the fragment mass asymmetry . in these nuclei the reduction of the width of the barrier leads to a decrease of the half - lives by a few orders of magnitude what can be seen in the fm and no isotopes with @xmath200 as well as the rf and the sg isotopes . all nuclei with the second nrs hump leading to the so - called elongated fission " @xcite ( i.e. fm and no with @xmath201 as well as rf and sg with @xmath202 ) are marked in fig . [ fig : t1/2 ] by the blue stars . in the heavier isotopes of the @xmath198 interval , where only the single rs barrier remains , one observes a rise of the fission half - lives with the neutron number . the slope of this trend changes from an almost flat dependence in fm to a very steep one in sg , ds , cn , and @xmath89 . this trend is caused by a broadening of the barrier that eventually becomes a two humped one ( figs . [ fig : fb100 - 104 ] , [ fig : fb106 - 110 ] , [ fig : fb112 - 116 ] ) . the local maximum found in all elements in the partial half - lives at @xmath105 with respect to @xmath1 and fission decays indicates the special character of this neutron number in the chart of nuclides , see also fig . [ fig : spe ] . these isotones are the most stable in the close vicinity , hence , in many papers @xmath105 is called deformed magic number " . this name stresses the significant difference from the classical magic nuclei which are spherical in their ground states . many experimental data coming from the cold fusion " reactions are available in the region of isotopes with @xmath203 @xcite . the agreement of the @xmath1 decay half - lives with the theoretical predictions is noticeable although some discrepancies are observed . most calculated fission half - lives overestimate the experimental data . the agreement would be better if triaxial effects were taken into account in the saddle point of the first barrier . the consideration of the @xmath204-deformation in the calculations of nuclei in the fm region reduces the barrier heights by around 2 mev decreasing thereby the theoretical fission half - lives by around 2 orders of magnitude @xcite . at variance with the discussion of sect . [ sect : iva ] in these nuclei this reduction is not fully compensated by an increase of the inertia parameters . therefore discrepancies between the theory and the experiment diminishes considerably . it should be pointed out that the fastest decay is properly predicted in all cases . furthermore , when the experimental data for @xmath1 emission and fission provide comparable decay probability for both processes the theoretical predictions are also similar for both partial half - lives . almost all nuclei in this region do have half - lives long enough to be considered as of experimental interest . the next region covers nuclei with neutron number from @xmath110 to @xmath112 . at @xmath110 a kink of 2 - 4 orders of magnitude in the @xmath1 decay half - lives can be observed corresponding to a local maximum in @xmath21 , see fig . [ fig : qalpha ] . the increase of the neutron number for a given isotope causes a linear growth in the @xmath1 half - life following the tendency already observed in the lighter nuclei . the half - life rise up to the neutron number @xmath112 where the locally longest living isotopes are found , see also fig . [ fig : qalpha ] . they reach values from @xmath206 s in @xmath207 to @xmath208 s in hs . again , the half - lives calculated for heavier isotones are smaller and , consequently , the @xmath1 emission becomes the most probable decay channel in the proton rich nuclei . the as - rs fission half - lives for nuclei with @xmath209 behave completely different than those for @xmath198 . after passing the maximum at @xmath105 they decrease up to the local minimum at @xmath186 . the drop is very steep for the lighter elements ( rf , sg , hs ) and gentler for the heavier ones ( ds , cn ) , whereas for the isotopes of @xmath89 almost no change is observed . this behavior can be explained by the decreasing potential energy along almost the whole barrier , associated with a diminishing of the saddle point energy and the clear development of the second minimum ( figs . [ fig : fb100 - 104 ] , [ fig : fb106 - 110 ] , [ fig : fb112 - 116 ] ) . the inverse trend of increasing the potential energy at small deformations is noticed in heavier elements , starting from cn ( fig . [ fig : fb112 - 116 ] ) . the first rs hump of the barrier grows up with increasing mass of a nucleus . in the heavy isotopes with @xmath210 it is higher than the second rs barrier . the half - lives calculated for @xmath211 along the nrs path diminish more rapidly with the increase on @xmath97 than in the rs mode . this is induced by the changes that take place in the nrs barrier , namely the fast decrease of its height and , more important , the narrowing of its width , see figs . [ fig : fb106 - 110 ] , [ fig : fb112 - 116 ] . in nuclei with @xmath212 the nrs fission barrier allows to avoid the second hump of the rs barrier making the asymmetric fission the most probable mode . very short fission half - lives , even below @xmath213 ms , can be found in the hs , ds , cn and @xmath89 isotopes , where the nrs fission is the dominant decay mode being even faster than the @xmath1 emission . in @xmath89 the nrs fission has half - lives comparable to the @xmath1 decay . the available experimental data around @xmath79 obtained from the hot fusion " experiments @xcite , fit perfectly to the theoretical predictions . in cn two spontaneous fission half - lives correspond to the prediction of the nrs fission mode . in @xmath214 the observed 50% branching ratio is very well reproduced . in the isotope with two more neutrons the detected @xmath1 decay is predicted with only slightly longer half - life than in the dominant fission channel . finally , in @xmath189 and @xmath207 the dominant @xmath1 radioactivity is properly predicted by the theoretical analysis with a good estimation of the half - lives . while approaching @xmath112 the fission half - lives increase with a slope which grows with the proton number . this effect is governed by two trends observed in the evolution of the pes s . the first one is the aforementioned growth of the first hump of the barrier which is the highest one in almost all nuclei with @xmath215 . the other factor is the lowering of the energy of the oblate minimum which becomes the ground state in the nuclei around @xmath112 ( cf . discussion of ground - state deformations in sec . [ ssgsp ] ) . the shift of the ground state from the prolate to the oblate minimum , see also fig . [ fig : spe ] , gives an additional increase of the barrier height up to over 1 mev . the energy difference between prolate and oblate minima has its largest value in the @xmath112 isotones what , added to the large first barrier , produces extremely long half - lives . they exceed ( in the nrs mode ) @xmath216 s in cn and @xmath89 and @xmath217 s in @xmath88 . in the neutron rich hs isotopes the nrs barriers extend up to relatively large values of the quadrupole moment . therefore their transition probabilities are smaller than in the rs mode . this fact together with the long @xmath1 decay half - lifes implies that in this region one can find isotopes with very long half - lives . the rs fission is the dominant decay mode . however these very neutron rich hs isotopes are extremely difficult to synthesize using contemporary experimental techniques . the saddle point of the first hump of the barrier takes its maximal energy value at @xmath81 . we can observe in these isotones another very high maximum of the fission half - lives in all elements . in contrast , the @xmath219 isotones decay a few orders of magnitude faster than the neighboring nuclei with @xmath112 and @xmath81 . the influence of the oblate minimum and the high first barrier is not strong enough to enlarge the fission half - lives here . in two isotones with @xmath219 , namely cn and @xmath89 , the nrs fission is the dominant process with half - lives shorter than for the @xmath1 decay . the energy difference between the oblate and the prolate minima as well as between the absolute values of their quadrupole moments shrink in @xmath219 and @xmath81 continuously . finally , one founds that all @xmath63 isotones do have a spherical ground state . this indicates a magic number at @xmath63 . nevertheless , this feature does not have a big impact on the fission half - lives and the region of the most stable nuclei is slightly shifted towards the neutron deficient isotopes . at @xmath112 and @xmath81 the @xmath1 decay half - lives also reach their maxima although they are less pronounced than for the fission half - lives . they correspond to the minima of @xmath21 that can be observed for these neutron numbers , see fig . [ fig : qalpha ] . for the @xmath220 elements the @xmath1 emission is the fastest decay process for isotopes lighter than @xmath63 . most of them live long enough to allow the synthesis of these nuclei . the extremely long fission half - lives for the @xmath112 and @xmath81 isotopes are larger than the @xmath1 decay half - lives in cn and @xmath89 whereas for @xmath219 nrs fission is the dominant mode . the isotopes with neutron number larger than the magic @xmath63 are characterized by a rapid decrease of the fission half - lives with increasing neutron number . this is a consequence of the decrease of energy along the whole energy barrier . the second minimum goes down below the ground state and the height of the first barrier reduces substantially when heavier nuclei are considered . these strong trends can not be balanced by the few mev decrease of the ground state energy due to the octupole deformation . consequently , for the elements from ds to @xmath88 , fission becomes the dominant decay mode with half - lives below @xmath192s . the @xmath1 decay half - lives do not vary strongly along the isotopic chain in this region . the fluctuations are associated with the changes of the ground state deformations of the parent and the daughter nuclei . in this region the decrease of the @xmath1 decay half - lives with the proton number is also visible . most isotopes in this region can not be synthesized due to the very short fission ( in the proton deficient nuclei ) or @xmath1 emission ( in the proton rich isotones ) half - lives . the experimental limit of @xmath221 ms is exceeded only for a few nuclei . to conclude this section we would like to present in fig . [ fig : t1/2_main ] the shortest half - lives of each isotope in the form of the chart of she s . from this figure it is easy to distinguish the regions where each decay mode plays the most important role . the predominant decay mode , specially in the proton rich region , is the @xmath1 emission . roughly speaking , the spontaneous fission in the rs mode is dominant in the proton deficient nuclei with @xmath222 for @xmath223 , @xmath224 for @xmath157 , and @xmath225 for @xmath226 . in the central part of the diagram the region with the fastest decay in the nrs fission channel is defined by @xmath227 and @xmath228 . two regions of long living nuclei can be found also in fig . [ fig : t1/2_main ] . the first one includes nuclei around @xmath229sg@xmath230 where half - lives reach @xmath231 s. the other island of stability " is associated with the anomalous long fission half - lives at @xmath112 and @xmath81 . at these neutron numbers ( and also at @xmath63 ) long living isotopes of cn and @xmath89 elements can be found . the half - lives of these isotopes are also longer than @xmath232 s. very long half - lives characterize also the hs isotopes decaying through the rs fission . in this work the hatree - fock - bogoliubov theory with large basis size and the density dependent gogny force as interaction have been used to study the most relevant properties of 160 heavy and super - heavy elements as well as their predominant decay modes . in order to keep the calculations as general as possible we allow for wave functions with different symmetries , namely axially symmetric and reflexion symmetric , axially symmetric and non reflexion symmetric and lastly triaxial wave functions . after a thorough analysis along different fission paths and considering that our calculations are extremely cpu time demanding due to the large basis to study 160 nuclei we perform most calculations in the axially symmetric approaches . the ground state deformations @xmath233 and @xmath102 as well as @xmath21 factors , pairing properties and the two neutron and two proton separation energies are thoroughly discussed . the single particle energies are used as a guide for the interpretation of these properties . the fission paths for three representative nuclei , namely @xmath130hs , @xmath131ds and @xmath132cn , are analyzed in detail . properties like mass parameters , pairing features and the variation of the action among others are calculated along the fission path with wave functions of the three types mentioned above . we find that though the shape of the fission barrier has a large impact on the fission half - lives , the mass parameter also plays an important role . in such a way that wave functions with larger barriers and smaller mass parameter may tunnel easier than alternative ones with smaller barriers and larger mass . since in general axially symmetric wave functions do have smaller masses than the triaxial ones , the restriction to axial symmetry is a good option to perform a systematic study of the half - lives of she . in the second part of the paper a thorough study of the shapes of the barriers in the as - rs and as - nrs is performed . a reasonable explanation of heights and shapes as well as of octupole effects is obtained on the basis of the single particle energy levels . the two dimensional ( @xmath234 ) energy contour plots for the nuclei @xmath130hs and @xmath132cn allow to disentangle the different fission paths and its possible interconnections . in the third part of the paper the half - lives of all studied nuclei are calculated for the different decay modes , namely @xmath1-decay and along the different fission paths . we find clear tendencies with the neutron number easily explainable on the basis of the behavior of @xmath21 factors and barrier shapes , respectively . in particular , we find that the @xmath1 emission is the predominant decay mode , specially in the proton rich region . concerning the spontaneous fission we obtain that the rs mode is dominant for the proton deficient nuclei in medium mass she s with @xmath222 for @xmath223 , @xmath224 for @xmath157 , and in the region of the heaviest she s with @xmath225 for @xmath226 . the fastest decay in the nrs fission channel takes place for @xmath227 and @xmath228 . the long living nuclei can be found two regions . the first one is in the vicinity of @xmath229sg@xmath230 where half - lives around @xmath231 s are obtained . the anomalous long fission half - lives for proton deficient isotones with @xmath112 , @xmath81 and @xmath63 create the second region . at these neutron numbers several isotopes of the elements cn and @xmath89 are found with half - lives longer than @xmath232 s. very long half - lives characterize also the hs isotopes decaying through the rs fission . the nuclei beyond @xmath88 and @xmath63 have half - lives too short to be detected within contemporary experimental limit of @xmath192s . in conclusion we have presented a systematic study of she within the self - consistent hfb with very general wave functions and large configuration space . our calculations provide an overall interpretation of the systematics and global properties of these elements and its decay modes . in general we find a reasonable good agreement with the experimental data . the authors would like to thank prof . krzysztof pomorski for a careful reading of the manuscript . contribution of luis m. robledo to this paper is gratefully acknowledged . work partially supported by grant no . dec-2011/01/b / st2/03667 from the national science centre ( poland ) and by the spanish ministerio de educacin y ciencia under contracts fpa2009 - 13377-c02 - 01 and fpa2011 - 29854-c04 - 04 and the spanish consolider - ingenio 2010 programme cpan ( csd2007 - 00042 ) . Abstract:
[ "a systematic study of 160 heavy and super - heavy nuclei is performed in the hartree - fock - bogoliubov approach with the finite range and density dependent gogny force with the d1s parameter set . we show calculations in several approximations : with axially symmetric and reflexion symmetric wave functions , with axially symmetric and non - reflexion symmetric wave functions and finally some representative examples with triaxial wave functions are also discussed . relevant properties of the ground state and along the fission path are thoroughly analyzed . fission barriers , q@xmath0-factors and lifetimes with respect to fission and @xmath1-decay as well as other observables are discussed . larger configuration spaces and more general hfb wave functions as compared to previous studies provide a very good agreement with the experimental data . + +" ]
18,417
18,417
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in the late 70 s , montonen and olive discovered that a given four dimensional gauge theory might be described using different sets of elementary fields @xcite . the fields in one of this set create the standard perturbative spectrum of the theory ( photon , w bosons , quarks , ) , while the fields in the `` dual '' set correspond to the solitonic states ( dyons ) . an example of such a phenomenon was observed even before in some two dimensional theories @xcite . since then , a natural and exciting question arose : can we find theories where the description in terms of the solitonic states is the same ( same field content and symmetries in the lagrangian ) as the description in terms of the perturbative states ? answering this question requires to understand the strong coupling behaviour of the gauge theories under study , since exchanging electrically charged perturbative states with magnetically charged solitonic states amounts to inverting the gauge coupling constant due to the dirac quantization condition . this was out of reach in the 70 s , though some important progress was made . first , it was realized that the natural arena for electric - magnetic duality was yang - mills theories with extended supersymmetries @xcite . second , it was pointed out that in order to have dyons of spin 1 , which could be the dual of the w bosons , @xmath1 supersymmetry seemed to be required @xcite . actually , an exact electric - magnetic duality , combined with the dirac quantization condition , implies that the @xmath8 function must vanish . this is indeed the only case where the electric coupling @xmath9 and the magnetic coupling @xmath10 , being constant , have the same behaviour under the renormalization group flow . the @xmath1 theory is known to be conformally invariant at the quantum level , perturbatively @xcite as well as non - perturbatively @xcite . at the perturbative level , this property is shared with some @xmath2 theories @xcite , which are believed to be finite even non - perturbatively at least when the rank of the gauge group is one . the latter theories are strongly believed to have , together with the @xmath1 theory , an exact electric - magnetic duality symmetry ; we will study them below . there are various ways to test these duality conjectures . one of them , advocated in @xcite , consists of looking at the ( hyper)elliptic curve from which the low energy physics can be deduced , and check whether some sensible duality transformations can be defined in order to insure exact electric - magnetic duality symmetry . another approach has been to look at the free energy @xcite . but the most popular test certainly is to determine the content of a particular sector of the hilbert space , the bps sector , and to check whether it is compatible with duality @xcite . to study solely the bps states is not too restrictive . actually , all the perturbative and known stable solitonic states are bps states . moreover , this is in general a very accurate test . for instance , it is well known that the bps spectra of the asymptotically free @xmath2 theories certainly do not have the same symmetries as the associated ( hyper)elliptic curve . there are also some technical reasons to study the bps spectra . an exact quantum mass formula is known for these states , stemming from the fact that they lie in small representations of the supersymmetry algebra and thus saturate the bogomolnyi bound @xcite . the semiclassical quantization can give reliable results when one can go continuously from weak coupling to strong coupling without altering the stability of the states , which is the case for instance in the @xmath1 theory . and , what is maybe their most intriguing property , it seems that the bps spectra can be computed completely once one knows the low energy structure of the theory , that is all the information about these spectra seems to be contained , in a very hidden way , in the ( hyper)elliptic curve . in this paper , i will study in detail the bps spectra of two @xmath2 theories having zero @xmath8 function . the first one will be the so(3 ) gauge theory with one flavour of bare mass @xmath11 , which reduces to the @xmath1 theory when @xmath12 , and the second one will be the su(2 ) gauge theory with four hypermultiplets whose bare masses will be taken to be @xmath13 , @xmath14 . the fact that these seemingly very different theories can be treated in parallel stems from the fact that their low energy effective action are formally identical . i will use a method whose spirit originated in @xcite and which is completely understandable in the framework of non perturbative field theory la seiberg - witten @xcite . this will lead to a natural and rigorous proof that the spectra of both the @xmath1 and the @xmath2 theories are self - dual when the bare masses are zero . we will also see how the duality can still work in the massive theories though , as it will be shown , the spectra are no longer in general self - dual _ at a given point _ in the moduli space . the plan of the paper is as follows . in section 2 some generalities on the theories under study are recalled . particular emphasis is put on the quantum numbers carried by the solitonic states , as suggested by a semiclassical analysis , and it is explained why they are compatible with an exact duality symmetry . in section 3 , after a short presentation of the seiberg - witten curves whose exactitude will be our unique , very mild hypothesis , some of the physical ideas which are at the basis of the present work are presented . this leads to a limpid understanding of _ why _ states having any magnetic charges must exist in the theory , and also gives a flavour of what the spectra in the massive cases look like . it appears that in some regime , the magnetic charge is quantized much as if it were a periodic variable , while only one value of the electric charge is allowed . though the spectrum does not appear in general as being self - dual at a given point in moduli space , it is argued that it is nevertheless perfectly compatible with an exact s duality of the massive theories . it is also pointed out that semiclassical reasonings might be able to account for the curious disappearance of all but very few states in some regions of moduli space , a phenomenon first discovered in @xcite at strong coupling . in order to prove the complete sl@xmath15 invariance of the spectra , the consideration of theories with non zero bare @xmath16 angle is needed . this is done in section 4 . we also discuss the appearance of superconformal points in some particular theories . in section 5 , the uniqueness of the states is proven , as required by duality . in section 6 , a general presentation of the curves of marginal stability , across which the bps spectra may be discontinuous , these curves are then used in section 7 to rigorously establish the existence of all the @xmath0 states , for @xmath3 and @xmath4 relatively prime integers , in the massless theories . finally , in section 8 , a general physical argument is presented which shows that the theories under study must have at least an exact @xmath5 duality symmetry . in particular , the bps spectra of the _ massless _ theories must be invariant under the monodromy group @xmath5 of the _ massive _ theories . we then deduce that the vector @xmath6 states exist in the massless @xmath7 theory . in appendix a , the computation of the seiberg - witten periods is presented , and in appendix b the curves of marginal stability are used to prove the existence of some particular states required by duality in the massive theories . as already noted in the introduction , one easy way to check whether a given theory may be , or can not be , self - dual , is to look at the quantum numbers carried by the states which are supposed to be transformed into each other by an electric - magnetic rotation . for example , the w bosons must be the dual of a charged particle having spin one in the one monopole sector . the very existence of such a spin one solitonic state is already a non trivial test of duality and was proven in @xcite . the main goal of this paper will be to extend this kind of result to all the electric and magnetic quantum numbers . in addition to the electric and magnetic charges , there is another abelian quantum number , which we will call the @xmath17 charge , which plays an important r^ ole , since it also appears in the central charge of the supersymmetry algebra and thus in the bps mass formula . the aim of this section is to explain the relations that may exist between these quantum numbers , and also to discuss the way one should compute the @xmath17 charges . the theory whose matter content is one @xmath2 adjoint `` quark '' hypermultiplet will be called hereafter the so(3 ) theory . this matter multiplet consists in two chiral @xmath18 superfields @xmath19 , which correspond in terms of ordinary fields to one dirac spinor @xmath20 and two complex scalars @xmath4 and @xmath21 in the adjoint representation of the gauge group . the microscopic lagrangian also contains one yang - mills @xmath2 multiplet ( one vector field @xmath22 , two majorana spinors @xmath23 and @xmath24 and one complex scalar @xmath25 ) . when the bare mass @xmath11 of the matter multiplet is zero , we recover the @xmath1 theory . when @xmath26 , the moduli space of vacua is a coulomb branch where the gauge symmetry is spontaneously broken down to u(1 ) by a non zero higgs vacuum expectation value , @xmath27 . when @xmath12 and @xmath1 , we have other equivalent coulomb branches , permutted by the su(4)@xmath28 symmetry , corresponding to the other scalar fields having a vev . in addition to the u(1)s associated to the electric @xmath29 and magnetic @xmath30 charges , the theory has an abelian u(1 ) global symmetry @xmath31 , @xmath32 , with corresponding charge @xmath17 . classically , the central charge of the supersymmetry algebra is @xmath33 where @xmath9 is the gauge coupling constant . semiclassically , the electric charge @xmath29 is @xmath34 , @xmath35 integer , up to terms coming from cp violation ( like a standard witten term proportional to the bare @xmath16 angle ) . the magnetic charge is given by the dirac quantization condition , @xmath36 for an integer @xmath37 . we will loosely call in the following the integers @xmath35 and @xmath37 the electric and magnetic charges . the mass of a bps state @xmath38 will then be @xmath39 for instance , an elementary quark @xmath40 has a tree level mass @xmath41 . the exact quantum formula for @xmath42 can be found . it was shown in @xcite that it can be cast in the form @xmath43 here @xmath44 is the dual variable of @xmath45 and can be , at least in principle , computed very explicitly as a function of a gauge invariant coordinate @xmath46 on the moduli space ( @xmath46 is @xmath47 up to a constant ) @xcite . at the tree level , we have @xmath48 , where @xmath49 is a very convenient combination of the gauge coupling @xmath9 and the theta angle @xmath16 which has a simple transformation law under s duality . note that @xmath50 is not renormalized since the @xmath8 function is zero . together with the mass @xmath11 and the coordinate on the moduli space @xmath46 , it is the only parameter in the theory . the constants @xmath51 in ( [ cc ] ) are only indirectly related to the physical @xmath17 charges @xcite , but can be computed very explicitly , see below . this theory differs from the preceding one by its matter content . now we have four @xmath2 hypermultiplets @xmath52 , @xmath53 , transforming in the fundamental representation of the gauge group su(2 ) . we will limit ourselves , for reasons that will become clear in section 3 , to the case where two of these hypermultiplets are massless , say @xmath14 , and the other two have identical masses @xmath13 . the global non abelian symmetry of the theory is then @xmath54 ( concerning the occurence of the universal cover spin(4 ) of so(4 ) instead of so(4 ) itself for the symmetry associated with the two massless hypermultiplet , see the next subsection ) . this shows that some states are likely to come in doublets in this theory , as we will see later . the moduli space of vacua has again a coulomb branch where dyons can exist , in addition to higgs branches which we will not study . the formula ( [ cccl ] ) is still valid along the coulomb branch , but now we will have in general @xmath55 , @xmath35 integer , instead of @xmath56 , because the gauge group is really su(2 ) and no longer so(3 ) in this theory . the elementary quarks have @xmath57 for instance . moreover , the @xmath17 charge will correspond to the transformations @xmath58 , @xmath59 for the quarks @xmath60 and @xmath61 simultaneously . at a given point on the moduli space of vacua , the parameters of the theory will be @xmath11 and a generalized unrenormalized gauge coupling @xmath62 . note the difference between this definition and the corresponding one in the so(3 ) theory . the advantage of this choices will become apparent in section 3 . moreover , in order to keep the formula ( [ cc ] ) in the same form in the two theories , we will define here the parameter @xmath45 by @xmath63 . these different sets of conventions were already used in @xcite and allow to make the formal similarity between the two theories under study very explicit , see section 3 . from the semiclassical point of view , the solitonic states appear as bound states of a supersymmetric quantum mechanics describing the low energy dynamics of interacting dyons @xcite . the dynamical variables of this supersymmetric quantum mechanics correspond to zero modes of the elementary fields of the quantum field theory . in a @xmath37 monopole configuration , there are @xmath64 real bosonic zero modes . the four zero modes that are present for all @xmath65 correspond to the center of mass motion ( three modes ) and to the global electric charge ( one periodic mode ) . the other @xmath66 zero modes describe the relative motions and electric charges . to these bosonic zero modes are associated some fermionic one . from callias index theorem @xcite we know that the two adjoint majorana spinors of the @xmath2 vector multiplet will give @xmath67 complex zero modes @xmath68 , @xmath69 , carrying spin @xmath70 . the other fermionic zero modes come from the matter fermions and differ in the so(3 ) and @xmath7 theory . there , the adjoint fermions in the matter multiplet will yield @xmath67 additional complex fermionic zero modes @xmath71 . these zero modes carry spin @xmath70 and @xmath17 charge @xmath72 . the quantization of the four @xmath73 and @xmath20 fermionic zero modes corresponding to @xmath74 yields to a spectrum of @xmath75 states . when @xmath12 , this correspond to a full short @xmath1 multiplet . this shows that monopoles @xmath76 may be the dual of the w bosons . when @xmath77 , there are some additional zero modes . however it will become clear in the following sections that the @xmath77 stable bound states that exist in the theories under study all have the same quantum numbers as the @xmath76 monopoles ( in some sense , they can be generated by a continuous deformation of the @xmath76 monopoles or of the elementary excitations ) . this means that for the stable states , the additional zero modes play no rle , and thus we will discard them in the following . when the mass @xmath11 is set to a non zero value , the @xmath1 multiplet splits into three parts corresponding to states having the same @xmath17 charge and thus the same mass . more precisely , from the sixteen states of the @xmath1 multiplet we get : eight states corresponding to one @xmath2 vector multiplet , which may be the dual to the @xmath2 w bosons @xmath78 ; four states corresponding to one - half of a cpt self conjugate @xmath2 hypermultiplet ( the other half is obtained by quantization in the @xmath79 monopole sector ) , which may be the dual of one component of the adjoint elementary quark , say @xmath80 ; and four states which may be the dual to @xmath81 . this is summarized in table 1 . [ states1 ] .the sixteen states of a @xmath1 multiplet , with their spin and @xmath17 charge . @xmath82 is the a priori unknown @xmath17 charge of the state @xmath83 . the @xmath2 content of the @xmath1 multiplet is also indicated . [ cols="<,<,<,<,<,<,<",options="header " , ] in the bps mass formula ( [ bpsmass],[cc ] ) appears , in addition to the electric and magnetic quantum numbers @xmath35 and @xmath37 , a term @xmath84 proportional to the mass . the computation of @xmath51 for each bps state is crucial in order to have quantitative predictions for the physical masses , as we will need in the following . however , the meaning of the constant @xmath51 is not clear at first sight . it can not be identified with the physical @xmath17 charge , because the latter has a non trivial dependence on the higgs expectation value due to the spontaneous breaking of cp invariance . this is , for the @xmath17 charge , a similar effect as the witten phenomenon for the electric charge @xcite , and was discussed in @xcite . there it was shown that the non trivial part of the physical @xmath17 charge is actually automatically included in the periods @xmath45 and @xmath44 , and is responsible for the constant shifts these variables can undergo under duality transformations . this possibility is related to the fact that @xmath45 and @xmath44 are period integrals of a meromorphic one form having poles with non zero residus @xcite , see appendix a. the constants @xmath51 are thus simply a constant part of @xmath17 not already included in @xmath44 and @xmath45 . they can always be determined by consistency considerations , see section 4.4 and the discussion in section 5 . in this section , some arguments are presented which lead to a clear physical understanding of _ why _ states with any magnetic charges must exist in the theories we are studying , in the context of quantum field theory alone . we will heavily rely on the seiberg - witten low energy effective action , encoded in the elliptic curve presented in @xcite . thus this section begins with a brief review of this result , emphasizing that it is by now established at a high level of rigour , and above all _ does not _ rely on any duality assumption . this short survey will also serve to set our notations . because of @xmath2 supersymmetry , the variables @xmath86 and @xmath45 , which not only completely determine the form of the low energy effective action ( up to two derivatives and four fermion terms ) , but also enter the bps mass formula ( [ bpsmass ] ) , must be analytic functions of the gauge invariant coordinate @xmath46 on the coulomb branch @xcite . these analytic functions have branch cuts and sl@xmath15 monodromies due to singularities caused by charged particles becoming massless for some values of @xmath46 . the number and type of singularities occuring on the coulomb branch can most easily be found by analyzing the theory in a limit where the mass @xmath11 is very large compared to some scale @xmath87 which represents the dynamically generated scale of the asymptotically free theory we obtain after integrating out the supermassive hyper(s ) . quantitatively , this limit corresponds to @xmath88 with @xmath89 let us focus for concreteness on the so(3 ) theory . in this regime , and at scales of order @xmath87 , the theory must look like the pure gauge theory , since the ultra - massive quarks must decouple . the singularity structure of the pure gauge theory was already greatly deduced in @xcite , and it was recently studied at an even higher degree of rigour @xcite . the result is that , without making any duality assumption , one can prove that we have two singularities at strong coupling whose monodromy matrices are conjugate to @xmath90 . moreover , we must have at scales of order @xmath11 , where a tree level analysis must be valid when @xmath91 , an additional singularity coming from an elementary quark becoming massless . the monodromy matrix is here again conjugate to @xmath90 , as can be deduced with the help of the @xmath8 function of the low energy theory @xcite , or even directly in the microscopic theory @xcite . actually , the monodromy transformation for @xmath92 around a singularity at @xmath93 due to a state @xmath94 becoming massless is @xmath95 where @xmath96 searching for an elliptic curve of the form @xmath97 , where @xmath98 is a polynomial of degree three , whose moduli space will reproduce the singularity structure described above , is then a fairly simple mathematical exercice . the solution is unique and given by @xcite @xmath99 where @xmath100 and @xmath101 the discussion above was for the so(3 ) theory , but as noted in @xcite , the singularity structure and thus the curve is exactly the same in the @xmath102 theory , provided one chooses bare masses @xmath103 and @xmath104 for the matter hypermultiplets , uses the different sets of convention introduced in section 2.1 , and expresses the curve in terms of a dimensionless constant @xmath50 which is @xmath105 only at the tree level but receives one loop as well as non perturbative corrections @xcite . though this useful relation will allow us to study the so(3 ) and the @xmath102 theories in parallel , be careful that it is only a formal one . for instance , only even , @xmath106-instantons corrections exist in the @xmath102 theory , whereas all @xmath107-instantons contribute in the @xmath108 theory . with our conventions , these corrections will both be proportional to @xmath109 . there are also important differences at the level of the spectra . one of them is that in the so(3 ) theory , a state @xmath110 may correspond to a vector multiplet ( w bosons ) , whereas in the @xmath102 theory the ws are labeled as @xmath111 . moreover , due to the flavour symmetry , the singularities in the @xmath7 theory are produced by su(2 ) doublets of hypermultiplets becoming massless . the general form of the monodromy matrices ( [ monomat ] ) remains valid since if the solution for the periods is noted @xmath112 for the so(3 ) theory , it will be @xmath113 for the @xmath7 theory . the parameter @xmath46 appearing in ( [ curve ] ) is a good gauge invariant coordinate on the coulomb branch , which is related to the physical expectation value @xmath114 by a formula of the form @xmath115 the @xmath116 correspond to instanton corrections @xcite . we conventionally extracted the combination @xmath117 because it tends towards the physical parameter @xmath118 under the renormalization group flow towards the pure gauge theory or the @xmath119 massless theory ( [ rg ] ) . the transformation properties of the parameters @xmath120 of the theories under s duality can easily be read from the curve ( [ curve ] ) . under a general sl@xmath15 transformation given by a matrix @xmath121 we have @xmath122 the fact that these strong - weak coupling transformations can be coherently implemented on the curve ( [ curve ] ) is already a non - trivial evidence that the theories may be self - dual @xcite . below , we will investigate the transformation properties of the variables @xmath86 and @xmath45 ( or equivalently of the electric @xmath123 and magnetic @xmath124 charges ) . this will give rise to predictions on the bps spectra . checking that these predictions are indeed true will be the main goal of the forecoming sections . in the remainder of section 3 , we will set the bare @xmath16 angle to zero . the very interesting physics associated with the possibility of having a varying real part in @xmath50 will be considered in section 4 . to guess what the analytic structure ( position of the singularities and of the branch cuts ) looks like , it is simplest to choose the parameters so that we are not far away from the pure gauge theory ( or massless @xmath125 ) , where we easily control what is going on . at strong coupling , we have two singularities on the real axis , at points @xmath126 and @xmath127 such that @xmath128 , with an analytic structure already worked out in @xcite . moreover , at weak coupling , we have a quark becoming massless at @xmath129 , with the following asymptotics for @xmath86 and @xmath45 : @xmath130 the exact location of the singularities @xmath131 can be found by setting the discriminant of the curve ( [ curve ] ) to zero , @xmath132 [ figure1 ] = 14.7 cm we have @xmath133 . we choose the position of the branch cut for the logarithm appearing in the asymptotics ( [ asympq ] ) in such a way that it does not disturb the analytic structure of the pure gauge theory . this is the most natural choice , since the existence of a singularity at a scale @xmath134 can not influence the physics at scale @xmath87 . in figure 1 are also indicated the quantum numbers of the particles becoming massless . note that due to a `` democracy '' between the dyons @xcite , the most general choices for the electric and magnetic charges of these states are @xmath135 where @xmath136 corresponds to the singularity @xmath137 and @xmath35 is any integer . our choice is @xmath138 . note also that due to the cuts , the particle becoming massless at @xmath126 is described by two different sets of integers , @xmath139 or @xmath140 , depending on whether one looks from the @xmath141 or @xmath142 half - plane . this shows that one must introduce two different monodromy matrices at @xmath126 , @xmath143 the other monodromy matrices are @xmath144 it is now possible to study the transformation properties of @xmath112 ( or equivalently of @xmath145 ) under duality . the naive guess would be that @xmath92 transforms exactly according to the corresponding sl@xmath15 matrix @xmath146 acting on the parameters of the microscopic theory as in ( [ dualt ] ) . however , we will see that this is not true in general . we must introduce an sl@xmath15 matrix @xmath147 which acts on the low energy effective action ( i.e. @xmath44 and @xmath45 ) while @xmath146 acts on the microscopic parameters . this subtlelty stems from the fact that the monodromy group associated with the curve ( [ curve ] ) is @xmath5 , the subgroup of sl@xmath15 consisting in the matrices congruent to the identity modulo 2 . the only straightforward and correct statement that can be done is thus that @xmath148 mod 2 . moreover , in the massive theories , @xmath44 and @xmath45 can also pick up some constants under a duality transformation . this is allowed by the form of the bps mass formula ( [ bpsmass],[cc ] ) , since a shift in @xmath44 or ( and ) @xmath45 can be reabsorbed in a shift of @xmath51 . a very similar and related phenomenon occurs when one is studying the duality transformations of the low energy theory @xcite , but one must keep in mind that by now we are studying duality transformations of the whole , microscopic , theory . let us be more concrete . what we want to deduce is a formula relating the dual theory solution characterised by the parameters @xmath149 given by ( [ dualt ] ) and whose periods are @xmath150 to the original solution described by @xmath151 . let us focuss in this section on the transformation @xmath152 . the analytic structure of @xmath153 can be readily deduced from the one of @xmath112 depicted in figure 1 . indeed , as @xmath154 , @xmath155 and @xmath156 , the effect of the duality transformation will simply be to exchange the singularities at @xmath129 and @xmath126 while the singularity at @xmath127 remains fixed . the dual theory thus has singularities at exactly the same points as the original theory ( a direct consequence of the self - duality of the curve ( [ curve ] ) ) , but the quantum numbers of the states becoming massless at a given point , as well as the position of the branch cuts , are changed , see figure 2 . [ figure2 ] = 14.7 cm this is enough to deduce that @xmath157 the shifts by @xmath158 come from the fact that a dyon is exchanged with a quark , and these two states have different @xmath51 . moreover , the s duality transformation does not simply exchange @xmath45 and @xmath44 ( up to a sign , and up to the shifts ) . this is not surprising since the state becoming massless at @xmath159 is @xmath160 in both formulations , and this state is not self - dual ( is not an eigenvector of s ) . second , to eliminate the cut between @xmath159 and @xmath161 in the dual formulation ( and thus recover the same structure for the cuts as in the original formulation ) , it is necessary to perform an sl@xmath15 transformation , given on one side of the cut by the monodromy @xmath162 . this also explains why the transformation law depends on the sign of @xmath163 . we are by now in a position to state precisely what the duality @xmath85 implies for the dyon spectrum . these predictions will be tested in the following . at a very general level , suppose you postulate that the theories described by the variables @xmath112 and @xmath164 are equivalent . if @xmath165 where @xmath166 is an sl@xmath15 matrix and @xmath167 and @xmath168 are @xmath169-valued constant sections ( this is the most general transformation law we will encounter ) , then the existence of a state @xmath170 of charge @xmath51 in the theory @xmath112 will imply the existence of a state @xmath171 of charge @xmath172 in the theory @xmath164 with @xmath173 the @xmath174 product denotes the standard symplectic product , @xmath175 the formula ( [ galtrans2 ] ) is a straighforward consequence of the bps mass formula ( [ bpsmass ] ) . let us apply ( [ galtrans2 ] ) to the s transformation @xmath176 described by ( [ periodstrans ] ) . suppose that you have a state @xmath145 in the theory at given @xmath46 , @xmath50 and @xmath11 . this state may be a vector or a hyper multiplet of @xmath2 supersymmetry , and lie in a given representation of the flavour group . then s duality gives a prediction for the spectrum of the theory whose parameters are @xmath177 . if @xmath142 , we must have there a state @xmath178 , in a similar @xmath2 multiplet as the original state . the flavour quantum numbers may be changed as discussed in section 2.2 . if @xmath141 , the state predicted by duality will be @xmath179 . it is very important to realize that these predictions of duality relate theories having different parameters , even at the self - dual point @xmath180 . thus a priori they say nothing about the dyon spectrum of a given theory ( i.e. , at fixed @xmath46 , @xmath50 and @xmath11 ) . one may be tempted to argue that , due to the stability of the bps states , the parameters can be varied continuously without changing the spectrum . this means that a state which exists in the theory @xmath177 will also exist in the theory @xmath120 . this reasoning is indeed correct when @xmath12 , but is wrong in the massive case , due to the presence there of curves of marginal stability , accross which otherwise stable bps states become degenerate in mass with multiparticle states . on these curves , the decay of bps states is possible . we will investigate these decays in the following . their mere existence implies that _ the self - duality of a general @xmath2 theory does not entail that the spectrum of bps states is self - dual at a given point on the moduli space . _ let us now penetrate at the heart of our problem : is there an easy way to understand why the spectra of the massless theories should be self - dual ? can we readily imagine what the spectrum of the massive theories look like ? there is a regime where the second question can be easily answered , at least partially . by choosing the parameters as indicated in ( [ rg ] ) , we can integrate out the quarks having a bare mass , and we are thus left with the pure gauge theory ( for so(3 ) ) or with the su(2 ) theory with two massless flavours . the spectra of these theories are well - known @xcite . discarding for the moment the states having @xmath181 , which can have arbitrarily high physical masses when @xmath182 , two regions in the coulomb branch must be distinguished . indeed , to the possible decays of @xmath183 states into other @xmath183 states corresponds a unique curve of marginal stability is associated a whole family of curves . ] @xmath184 which looks like an ellipse and contains the singularities @xmath185 and @xmath159 @xcite , see figure 3 . [ figure3 ] = 14.7 cm it can be shown that inside the curve ( in the strong coupling region @xmath186 ) only the two bps states which become massless at @xmath126 or at @xmath127 can be present @xcite . these are @xmath187 and @xmath188 ( for this latter state , two different descriptions in terms of electric and magnetic quantum numbers are necessary , due to the non trivial analytic structure @xcite ) . outside the curve , in what we call the weak coupling region @xmath189 , the bps spectrum can be understood in different ways . the most natural certainly is to perform a semiclassical analysis , which is valid here because of asymptotic freedom ( in the context of the full , finite , theory , this means that we are considering a region of the coulomb branch where @xmath190 ) . this analysis first tells you that the perturbative states , created by the fundamental fields , must be present . in the so(3 ) theory , we have the w bosons @xmath191 and the photon @xmath192 which lie in vector multiplets . in the @xmath119 theory we again have the w bosons , now represented as @xmath193 , the photon , but also the elementary quarks @xmath194 and @xmath195 . beyond this perturbative spectrum , we have a solitonic spectrum . in the one monopole sector , we can construct all the states @xmath196 . the fact that all the integers @xmath123 are realized simply comes from the quantization of the periodic zero mode associated with electric charge rotations . statements about higher magnetic charges would be much harder to do . it was shown in @xcite that no state with @xmath197 exists , but a complete analysis for @xmath198 seems by now impossible , for the explicit form of the multimonopole metric is not known in general in these cases . however , there is another method , initiated in @xcite , which consists in remarking first that the spectum in @xmath199 must be invariant under the transformation @xmath200 this can be shown by transporting the state @xmath201 along a closed path encircling the two singularities and which does not cross @xmath202 , so that the state remains stable ( see figure 3 ) . in this operation , we cross the cut @xmath203 and thus should perform an analytic continuation of the periods @xmath86 and @xmath45 in order to insure that the physical mass of the state varies continuously . an analytic continuation @xmath204 across a cut will in general be related to the main solution @xmath92 by a relation of the form ( [ galtrans1 ] ) ( @xmath168 is indeed @xmath169-valued because the residues of the seiberg - witten differential form are @xmath205 , see appendix a ) . this shows that a state represented by @xmath94 on the one side of the cut will be represented by @xmath206 on the other side , see ( [ galtrans2 ] ) . for the cut @xmath203 , we will have @xmath207 and @xmath208 ( or the inverse matrix depending on whether we turn clockwise or counterclockwise ) , which indeed generates the transformation ( [ scinv ] ) . since the states @xmath160 and @xmath209 must be present ( they are responsible for the singularities ) , we immediately deduce that all the states @xmath196 are also present , for any integer @xmath123 . the reader might think that this is really a roundabout mean to show that electric charge is quantized . however , this reasoning also provides a statement about the @xmath210 sectors , powerful enough to show that no state with @xmath210 can exist . indeed , if such a state @xmath201 would exist , it would be associated with the whole tower of states @xmath211 , for any integer @xmath212 , angle shifts by mean of which you can not show that all these states exist at the same time . ] and _ one of these states will inevitably becomes massless _ somewhere on the curve @xmath202 since @xmath213 takes all real values between 0 and 2 on this curve @xcite . this would produce an additional singularity on the coulomb branch which does not exist . the greatest virtue of this kind of reasoning is that one can generalize it to other cases . we have just studied the rg flow ( [ rg ] ) towards the pure gauge ( or @xmath119 ) theory . it would be as natural to study the s dual of this rg flow , which would correspond to @xmath214 where @xmath215 this is inherently a strong coupling limit where the semiclassical method can not be applied . the solution for the dual pure gauge ( or massless @xmath119 ) theory is given by @xmath216 , and its analytic structure has already been worked out , see figure 2 . it is of course very tempting to try to repeat the analysis already made for the original theory . however , we can not generalize the reasoning at once because the position of the branch cuts are now completely different . the fact that we will nevertheless obtain a spectrum in complete accordance with duality is a nice evidence that s duality is indeed correct . the aim of this subsection is to work out the bps spectra implied by the analytic structure depicted in figure 2 . it is convenient to use , instead of @xmath216 , the periods @xmath217 this simply amounts to setting @xmath51 to zero for the two states @xmath110 and @xmath160 becoming massless . we will note with an uppercase @xmath146 the @xmath51 charge computed with the new variables , @xmath218 we have again a curve of marginal stability @xmath219 , which coincides with @xmath202 because of ( [ periodstrans ] ) . [ figure4 ] = 14.7 cm the coulomb branch is thus separated into two regions . the one inside the curve will be called in this context the weak coupling region @xmath220 and is the dual of the strong coupling region @xmath221 one had previously . outside the curve , we will have the strong coupling region @xmath222 . these names deserve some comments . in any case , one should keep in mind that the bare gauge coupling of the whole ( finite ) theory is very large in the limit ( [ rgdual ] ) . thus , by strong or weak coupling , we only refer to the effective coupling which governs the low energy physics . moreover , even in @xmath220 for instance , the effective theory may be strongly coupled ( it is near @xmath159 since there a magnetically charged particle is massless ) . the point is that the regions in @xmath220 where the coupling is strong can always be joined to other regions in @xmath220 where the coupling is weak , the dyon spectrum remaining unchanged . indeed , the _ electric _ effective coupling is zero at @xmath161 where the quark is massless . this suggests that the bps spectrum might be probed in the vicinity of @xmath161 by using standard , `` semiclassical , '' approximation schemes , since we do have in this region a small parameter in the original , `` electric , '' theory . actually , if duality is correct ( and we will prove that its predictions indeed are concerning the dyon spectrum ) , the physics should be the same in the weakly coupled region surrounding @xmath161 in figure 4 as in the strongly coupled region surrounding @xmath185 in figure 3 , and we should be able to account for the `` strong coupling '' jumps of the bps spectrum seen in @xcite by using such methods . however , we will not try to do that here . let us rather apply our method to the weak coupling spectrum @xmath223 . it contains of course the states @xmath160 and @xmath110 , which are responsible for the singularities and thus exist on both sides of the curve . we will now show that no other state , having @xmath224 , can exist . this can be understood by studying the variations of @xmath225 along the curve @xmath226 . @xmath225 is related to @xmath213 by the formulas ( [ newsol ] ) and ( [ periodstrans ] ) , and @xmath213 varies monotonically from 0 to 2 when one follows @xmath226 clockwise starting from and ending at the singularity where @xmath110 is massless . this immediately implies that @xmath225 takes all values between @xmath227 and 1 in the upper half plane , and all values between 1 and @xmath228 in the lower half plane . thus any state @xmath201 existing in @xmath229 will become massless somewhere on @xmath226 , at the point where @xmath230 , and then must be either @xmath110 or @xmath160 . this is in perfect agreement with s duality . when looking at the strong coupling spectrum , the complications come from the fact that one must consider analytic continuations across the cuts @xmath231 and @xmath232 . we then need to introduce two different descriptions @xmath233 and @xmath234 in terms of electric and magnetic quantum numbers of the _ same _ physical spectrum @xmath235 , depending on whether we are in the upper or lower half plane . this is satisfactory from the point of view of duality , see section 3.3 . quantitatively , a state @xmath201 in @xmath236 will be @xmath237 after crossing the cut @xmath232 and @xmath238 after crossing the cut @xmath231 . by looping around the curve of marginal stability , taking care of remaining in @xmath239 , we thus immediately deduce that @xmath234 must be invariant under the subgroup of sl@xmath15 generated by @xmath240 : @xmath241 applying this transformation to the states @xmath110 and @xmath160 , which we know must exist , will then generate states having _ any _ magnetic charge : @xmath242 actually , this shows that all the states dual to the @xmath196 states of the original theory will be present . moreover , to each state @xmath196 corresponds one and only one state in the dual theory , since there the states are in one to one correspondence with states becoming massless . are there any other states with @xmath224 ? if so , let @xmath201 be such a state in @xmath243 . if @xmath244 , it is the state @xmath110 which indeed exists for it is responsible for one of the singularity . , @xmath245 can exist since they would modify the structure of the singularity at @xmath161 . ] otherwise , let us consider the ratio @xmath246 . this ratio necessarily is in the interval @xmath247-\infty , 1[$ ] , since otherwise the corresponding state would become massless somewhere on the curve @xmath226 ( note that we are working in the lower half plane and thus we see only half of the curve ) . as explained above , in the upper half plane the same state is described by other electric and magnetic quantum numbers . crossing the cut @xmath248 , we will obtain another ratio @xmath249 , which must be in the interval @xmath2471,+\infty [ $ ] unless the particle becomes massless somewhere on the coulomb branch . one can return in the lower half plane by crossing the cut @xmath250 , and obtain again a new ratio @xmath251 . by repeating this operation , we obtain two homographic sequences @xmath252 and @xmath253 , @xmath254 with the following important property : if , for some @xmath255 , are obtained by looping counterclockwise around @xmath226 . ] @xmath256 or @xmath257-\infty , 1]$ ] , then the state @xmath201 we started from must be one of the states already obtained above ( see ( [ provspec ] ) ) . it is elementary to check that this is always the case , except if @xmath258 . this case corresponds , in the so(3 ) theory , to the dual of the w bosons , and is represented by @xmath259 in @xmath236 and by @xmath260 in @xmath261 . in the @xmath102 theory , we would again have , in @xmath236 , the state @xmath259 , now interpreted as being the dual of the elementary quarks , and also @xmath262 , interpreted as being the dual of the w. up to now , we did not take into account eventual decays of @xmath245 states into @xmath263 states along the path depicted in figure 4 , although this path can cross curves of marginal stability corresponding to such decays . however , the states @xmath264 have a mass of order @xmath11 , whereas the states @xmath224 are likely to have a mass of order @xmath87 in the region surrounding the singularities @xmath127 and @xmath129 we are considering . since in the rg flow , @xmath182 while @xmath87 is fixed , the decays are impossible and the curves of marginal stability simply indicate that the inverse decay reaction from a @xmath264 to a @xmath224 state is possible . one might put forward the fact that states having @xmath264 but arbitrarily high electric and magnetic charges could have a mass of order @xmath87 due to a subtle compensation of the terms @xmath265 and @xmath266 in the bps mass formula . however such fine tuning , which is indeed possible , can only occur for some very special values of @xmath123 and @xmath124 and in some very special and small regions in the @xmath46-plane . nothing prevents us to avoid these special points and to cross the curve of marginal stability nearby , where the @xmath264 state again have a mass of order @xmath11 . i wish here to point out that , though we have considered the possibility of these `` fine tuning '' points , they are very likely to be unphysical . indeed , if states producing these `` fine tuning '' points would exist , the theory would not have a well defined field theory limit under the ( dual ) rg flow . we have thus obtained the following results : states with any magnetic charges , dual to the dyons @xmath267 , indeed exist , with the correct multiplicities . thus , though the positions of the branch cuts are completely different in the original and in the dual theories , the deduced spectra are perfectly compatible with duality . however , we have not yet proven that the states corresponding to @xmath268 are really present ; we simply know that they may be . this point will be investigated in appendix b. in the preceding section , we have shown using simple arguments that stable states having any magnetic charge , which are required by s duality , indeed exist . we were studying theories with non zero bare masses , but it is very tempting to think that these states can be continuously deformed while remaining stable when @xmath269 and thus are at the origin of the existence of states having any magnetic charge in the massless theories as well . however , we will not obtain in this process all the states required by duality in the massless theories . for instance in the so(3 ) ( @xmath1 ) theory s duality implies the existence of all the states @xmath201 with @xmath123 and @xmath124 relatively prime . up to now , we only have the states @xmath270 with @xmath271 , and it is not difficult to realize in the context of the semiclassical approach @xcite that once you have one of these states , then you will also have all the other states @xmath272 , for any integer @xmath212 . actually , the missing states should come from configurations where states having any @xmath35 and @xmath37 relatively prime are massless at the singularities . the fact that such configurations must exist is clearly a necessary condition for the self - duality of the theories , and does not follow straightforwardly from the sl@xmath15 invariance of the curve ( [ curve ] ) . we saw above that for any imaginary value of @xmath50 ( @xmath273 ) , the singularities are produced by states having @xmath274 or @xmath275 alone . one must then study cases where @xmath276 and find a mechanism to understand how the quantum numbers at the singularities can change . this is similar to a phenomenon which is known to occur for instance in the massive su(2 ) asymptotically free theories , where semiclassical quarks must `` transmute '' into monopoles in order to account for the singularity structure at strong coupling @xcite . however , there can be an important difference between this kind of transmutation and the one we will see at work below . we will realize that two kinds of transmutations can occur . in the first kind , the quantum numbers of the state are changed according to a matrix of the form ( 8) . we will see in the next subsections that this is the only kind of transmutation that can occur in the theories under study in this paper , because singularities in the moduli space never coincide , see ( [ singpos ] ) . in the second kind of transmutation , the state transforms according to a matrix which is not of the form ( 8) ( note that , in any case , there are many of them , since the matrices ( 8) are all conjugate to some power of @xmath277 ) . these transmutations of the second kind are directly related to the necessity for two ( or more ) singularities to coincide for some special values of the parameters @xcite . these special points are known to lead to superconformal theories @xcite . let us come back to our problem . we will soon show that the quantum numbers at the singularities can only be changed by matrices belonging to the _ monodromy _ group @xmath278 ( in the cases under study , we will see that any matrix of @xmath279 can be generated ) . it is also clear that a necessary condition for the theories to be self - dual is that any state , related to the original states becoming massless by a _ duality _ group transformation , must become massless for some value of the coupling . if the @xmath136 denote the electric and magnetic quantum numbers of the particles becoming massless in the original configuration , we see that the theory can be self - dual only if @xmath280 where @xmath281 denotes the _ duality _ group . for our purposes , @xmath282 , @xmath283 , @xmath284 and @xmath285 . we thus have to check whether any @xmath0 , @xmath3 and @xmath4 relatively prime , can be generated by acting with a @xmath5 matrix on one of the three states @xmath209 , @xmath160 or @xmath286 . this is indeed true because sl@xmath287 and that @xmath288 is generated by three transpositions whose corresponding matrices ( already described mod 2 in section 2.2.2 ) can be chosen in order to map a `` fundamental '' state , say @xmath110 , exactly into the three states @xmath110 , @xmath160 and @xmath286 we have at our disposal . let us start from a configuration , characterized by a certain value of the bare coupling @xmath290 and of the bare mass @xmath11 , and whose analytic structure is of the same type as the one described in figure 1 . we will allow the monodromy matrices @xmath291 to be of the most general form , provided they satisfy the fundamental consistency conditions @xmath292 to these monodromy matrices correspond states becoming massless , characterized by their electric and magnetic quantum numbers @xmath293 and @xmath51-charge @xmath294 . note that ( [ consistency ] ) implies via ( [ monomat ] ) , amongst other relations of the same type , @xmath295 actually , as we will only consider configurations which are sl@xmath15 transforms of the original one depicted in figure 1 , sl@xmath15 symplectic invariant relations can be checked or deduced using @xmath296 , @xmath297 , @xmath298 and @xmath299 . some useful ones are @xmath300 we must also have @xmath301 now , let us vary continuously @xmath50 from @xmath290 to @xmath302 . during this operation , the singularities , and with them the branch cuts , will move on the coulomb branch , as depicted in figure 5 . [ figure5 ] = 14.7 cm unavoidably , the singularity at @xmath161 will cross the cut @xmath303 $ ] ; at this moment its quantum numbers are changed . according to ( [ mono],[galtrans2 ] ) , we will have @xmath304 the cut originating at @xmath161 will also sweep up one of the two singularities , and then change the quantum numbers there . we choose to change the singularity at @xmath185 ( see figure 5 ) because it is the only case which leads to an analytic structure at @xmath305 which is perfectly similar to the one at @xmath290 , and this is convenient for our purposes . the ambiguity associated with the position of the branch cut originating at @xmath161 is further discussed in the next subsection . as @xmath139 sees the original cut produced by @xmath306 , whereas @xmath140 sees the cut produced by @xmath307 , we will have @xmath308 finally , by using the consistency relations ( [ consistency],[consistency2],[consistency3 ] ) , we see that at @xmath309 we are in essentially the same configuration as at @xmath310 , up to a @xmath311 transformation and to a rotation and dilatation in the @xmath46 plane . quantitatively we have @xmath312 thus we have shown that we can change the quantum numbers of the singularities with the matrix @xmath311 ( the @xmath51 charges being also changed according to ( [ galtrans2 ] ) ) . performing @xmath311 transformations is not enough to prove sl@xmath15 invariance . we need an additional transformation , which can be found by studying the analytic continuation @xmath314 exactly along the lines of the preceding subsection . we will not repeat this argument here , but we will rather introduce another idea , which is maybe more heuristic , but has the merit of showing that the structure of the low energy effective action can imply the _ equivalence _ of theories related by some transformations of the monodromy group . we will elaborate more on this kind of argument in section 8 . the point is that by sweeping up the @xmath46 plane with the branch cut originating at @xmath161 , as shown in figure 6 , we can generate the transformation : would generate @xmath315 which is equivalent to @xmath316 due to the relations ( [ consistency ] ) . ] @xmath317 [ figure6 ] = 14.7 cm doing this on the original configuration of figure 1 is innocent since it will generate a trivial @xmath318 transformation , which is interpreted as an unphysical relabelling of the electric quantum numbers @xmath35 . it simply corresponds to a shift in the @xmath16 angle , which when combined with the change in @xmath35 will leave the physical electric charge and other physical observables unchanged . this shows that the position of the branch cut originating at @xmath161 is purely conventional when @xmath319 , and by continuity this ambiguity should be preserved even when the @xmath316 matrix is general ( we will see in the next subsection that any @xmath316 conjugated to @xmath318 by a @xmath5 matrix can be generated by analytic continuation ) . note that we performed the transformation at _ fixed _ @xmath46 , @xmath50 and @xmath11 . in the original configuration where @xmath319 , this renders very explicit the fact that the transformation @xmath320 is unphysical . is unphysical . however , this is not that obvious in this framework , and we will limit ourselves to transformations of the type of @xmath318 . ] this also shows that the physical interpretation of the parameter @xmath50 is no longer the same after analytic continuation : if we choose to still use @xmath50 even after the @xmath16 angle shift , the real part of @xmath50 clearly will no longer be @xmath321 ( or @xmath322 ) . this is even more striking when @xmath316 is general . then , the transformation mixes the electric and magnetic charges in a non trivial way , still at fixed @xmath50 . this is not contradictory to the dirac quantization condition . again , this shows that the duality transformation associated with @xmath316 links together two theories which are physically equivalent and thus can be labelled by the same parameters . of course , the physical interpretation of @xmath50 in the two equivalent theories will not be the same . similar remarks also apply to @xmath46 . to close this discussion , note that the ambiguity in the interpretation of @xmath50 we deal with in this subsection is related to the fact already mentioned in subsection 3.2 that the sl@xmath323 matrix @xmath147 which acts on @xmath112 coincides with the sl@xmath15 matrix @xmath146 which acts on @xmath50 and @xmath46 , _ only up to monodromy transformations . _ this suggests that @xmath50 can only be defined modulo @xmath5 and thus that the structure of the low energy effective action implies that the theory has at least an exact @xmath5 duality symmetry . we will see in section 8 that this can be understood on physical grounds , at least heuristically . let us come back to our original problem : can we generate any @xmath5 transformation ( up to a sign ) by combining the two elementary transformations ( [ m3trans],[m1trans ] ) described in the previous subsections and that we will denote abstractly @xmath324 and @xmath325 ? suppose that we execute the following sequence of transformations , @xmath326 starting from the configuration where the monodromy matrices are given by ( [ matrices],[matrices2 ] ) . one must take care of the fact that , after each step , the monodromy matrices are conjugated by the corresponding transformation . for instance , the transformation @xmath327 will indeed generate a @xmath328 transformation on the variables @xmath86 and @xmath45 . however , the @xmath329 transformation that follows will be implemented by the matrix @xmath330 , since the monodromy at @xmath127 is no longer @xmath331 but @xmath332 . the effect of conjugating the matrices at each step is simply to reverse the order of the transformations in ( [ seq1 ] ) to which correspond , up to a sign , the sl@xmath15 matrix @xmath333 here @xmath334 and @xmath331 are fixed matrices given by ( [ matrices],[matrices2 ] ) . we are thus able to obtain any matrix of the subgroup of sl@xmath15 generated by @xmath334 and @xmath331 . this is just @xmath5 as we need to prove the self duality of the spectrum , as explained at the end of section 4.1 . the @xmath51 charges of the @xmath335 states obtained above can also be easily computed , by evaluating the product ( [ seq2 ] ) where the monodromy matrices @xmath316 and @xmath311 are replaced by the corresponding elements of the full monodromy group , which is the semi - direct product @xmath336 ( see ( [ m1trans ] ) and ( [ m3trans ] ) ) : @xmath337 if @xmath338 then @xmath339 for @xmath60 or 3 , @xmath340 for @xmath61 and @xmath341 for @xmath342 . in order to put the present work into some perspective , i will briefly discuss below some relations with other approaches . let me first explain how our line of reasoning can shed light on some aspects of the semiclassical quantization . i will illustrate this point on the following example . it is well known in the context of the semiclassical approach @xcite that the existence of dyon - monopole bound states with @xmath343 in the pure @xmath2 gauge theory would violate the self - duality of the @xmath1 theory . this is due to the fact that such bound states are in one to one correspondence with the cohomology classes of _ holomorphic _ differentials on the reduced ( @xmath66 dimensional ) multimonopole moduli space in the case of the pure gauge theory , while the differentials only need to be harmonic in the case of @xmath1 . this means that any @xmath343 bound state of the pure gauge theory corresponds to @xmath344 bound states in the @xmath1 theory , the second state corresponding to the antiholomorphic partner of the original holomorphic differential form . this is in contradiction with @xmath17 duality which predicts the existence of one and only one bound state of given @xmath35 and @xmath37 . from our point of view , this seemingly purely technical relation between the two theories comes from the fact that they can be joined together by continuously varying the bare mass and the coupling and using the renormalization group flow . stable states in the pure gauge theory will then yield stable states in the @xmath1 theory , by continuous deformation . moreover , we do not want any additional @xmath343 state in the @xmath1 theory coming from the pure gauge theory , since we know that such states originate from the existence of dual pure gauge theories configurations . i wish now to point out one surprising aspect of our derivation , and trace its profound origin in superstring dualities . all our reasoning is based on a careful study of the low energy effective action of the theories . though it is well known that the latter contains a lot of information about the _ massive _ states ( encoded in the bps mass formula ( [ bpsmass ] ) ) in the context of @xmath2 supersymmetric theories , it might seem astonishing that it also governs the _ formation _ of all the stable bound states ( coming in short multiplets ) . nevertheless , this fact , which appears for the first time in @xcite , is supported by increasing evidence . i hope that the present paper will convince the reader that it is both understandable ( if not natural ) and quite general in the field theory framework . however , a deeper understanding of this phenomenon comes from string theory . there , in the framework of the heterotic - type ii duality conjecture @xcite , you can argue that the bps states of @xmath2 supersymmetric yang - mills theories correspond to a self - dual non - critical string in six dimensions wrapped along geodesics around the corresponding seiberg - wittern curve @xcite . the metric on the curve is directly related to a particular seiberg - witten differential , which can in principle be computed unambiguously . as all these geometric data are contained in the low energy effective action , we understand why it completely determines the bps spectrum . in the case of @xmath1 , the low energy theory as well as the metric are trivial and the self - duality of the spectrum follows easily @xcite from the assumption that the type iib string gives rise to the @xmath1 gauge theory in some limit . the cases of some su(2 ) theories , including also very recently the so(3 ) theory studied in this paper , were addressed in @xcite . the case of @xmath7 should also be within the stringy approach capabilities . our results thus constitute non trivial tests of the string - string duality hypothesis . we will mainly focus in this section on the @xmath1 theory , in order to avoid tiresome repetitions . in subsection 5.3 , we will nevertheless briefly point out the peculiarities of the @xmath7 theory , which do not yield any new difficulties . as there is only _ one _ multiplet in the hilbert space of states corresponding to the fundamental @xmath1 multiplet @xmath110 , s duality predicts the existence of only _ one _ @xmath1 multiplet @xmath0 . as indicated in the table 1 of section 2 , such an @xmath1 multiplet can be decomposed into three parts characterized by their physical s charges @xmath82 , @xmath345 and @xmath346 . when @xmath12 , we can use cp invariance to show that the existence of a state having @xmath17 implies the existence of another state having @xmath347 , and that in a given monopole sector @xmath348 , @xmath349 . angle does not influence the physical @xmath17 charge @xcite . ] uniqueness of the @xmath0 state would therefore imply that @xmath350 , and the three values of @xmath17 that should be realized correspond to the cp invariant combination @xmath351 . state in the semiclassical picture must be self - dual or anti self - dual . ] the extremal values @xmath352 and @xmath353 correspond to states belonging to a @xmath2 hypermultiplet , while @xmath354 corresponds to a @xmath2 vector multiplet . the @xmath0 states we have generated in section 4 in the massive theory correspond to @xmath2 hypermultiplets , having a given charge @xmath355 . because of @xmath1 supersymmetry in the @xmath269 limit , these hypermultiplets will be associated to other states to form whole @xmath1 multiplets @xmath356 or @xmath357 . the physical @xmath17 charges of a state @xmath358 must be related to the constants @xmath51 appearing in the central charge of the supersymmetry algebra by a relation of the form @xcite @xmath359 where @xmath360 . to determine @xmath361 , one can proceed as follows . when @xmath12 , the solution for @xmath86 and @xmath45 is given by @xmath362 where @xmath363 is the sign of @xmath163 . the ( unphysical ) cut for @xmath86 comes from the choice we did in section 3 for the position of the branch cut originating at @xmath129 when @xmath364 . when @xmath364 , we will have @xmath365 however , if @xmath366 , the physical @xmath17 charge contributes to @xmath86 and @xmath45 , even at infinity , by an amount determined by @xmath361 in such a way that @xmath367 @xmath361 can then be computed straightforwardly by using the formulas for @xmath86 and @xmath45 given in appendix a. one must note , however , that the sign of @xmath361 remains arbitrary , since it can be changed by performing a weyl gauge transformation . this is related to the fact that one can choose equivalently @xmath368 or @xmath369 to be massless at @xmath129 in the configuration of figure 1 . the convention we will choose hereafter is the following : @xmath368 will be chosen to be massless at @xmath129 when @xmath370 and @xmath369 when @xmath371 ( we will only consider real values of @xmath11 ) . these conventions will allow us to use the gauge invariance in a convenient way . finally , we have @xmath372 where @xmath373 is the sign of @xmath11 . this formula implies in particular that the dyons found in section 3 by studying the dual rg flow ( [ rgdual ] ) all have @xmath374 as expected . it is not disturbing that @xmath17 may undergo a discontinuity from @xmath375 to @xmath376 . this discontinuity simply reflects the ambiguity associated with cp invariance when @xmath46 or @xmath377 are real . to be concrete , we will hereafter consider a particular configuration , obtained from the original configuration depicted in figure 1 by performing the transformation @xmath378 ( see section 4 ) , and which is described in figure 7 . this amounts to changing @xmath86 into @xmath379 and @xmath45 into @xmath380 . [ figure7 ] = 14.7 cm this choice is completely arbitrary : _ all our reasonings will be sl@xmath15 invariant and thus completely general . _ however , we think that it is more eloquent to deal with states having magnetic charges three , four or seven than simply one , for in this latter case unicity of the states is trivial from the semiclassical point of view . we already know that the @xmath1 multiplet corresponding to a state @xmath381 becoming massles is unique since the singularities are produced by only one hypermultiplet . thus , what we need to show is that , for instance , the only allowed values of @xmath51 for a state @xmath382 should be @xmath383 ( charge of the hypermultiplet becoming massless ) together with @xmath384 and @xmath385 ( this would correspond to the case where the physical @xmath17 charge of @xmath386 would be @xmath72 ) or with @xmath387 and @xmath353 ( when @xmath388 ) . suppose that a state @xmath389 exists in the @xmath1 theory . when a real mass @xmath11 is turned on , @xmath389 must produce a singularity at any point on the coulomb branch where it is massless , that is where @xmath390 which in the original variables reads @xmath391 to study this equation , at least in the large @xmath392 limit , one can use the asymptotics ( [ limite ] ) for @xmath45 at large @xmath393 . this suggest that ( [ uni1 ] ) might have solutions only when @xmath394 when @xmath370 and only when @xmath395 when @xmath371 at points @xmath396 more rigorously , using ( [ cptrans ] ) and the monodromy @xmath316 , one can show that @xmath397 for @xmath398 . moreover , one can easily show using the explicit formulas of @xmath45 and its derivative @xmath399 given in appendix a that , in the case @xmath370 , @xmath45 is a monotonically increasing function for @xmath400 , with @xmath401 ( this latter value is reached at @xmath402 ) , and @xmath403 when @xmath404 . strictly similar results are true when @xmath371 , which proves that the simple analysis using the asymptotics is valid except concerning @xmath405 , as one may have expected . as the @xmath406 exist for any @xmath370 when @xmath407 and for any @xmath371 when @xmath408 , a singularity must be associated in the massive theories to any state @xmath389 existing in the massless one , provided @xmath407 ( if @xmath370 ) or @xmath408 ( if @xmath371 ) . from this we deduce that when @xmath370 , which corresponds to the case depicted in figure 7 , the state becoming massless at @xmath161 , having @xmath409 , must have a physical @xmath17 charge @xmath72 ( it is thus associated with states having @xmath405 and @xmath410 when @xmath12 ) , and that no other @xmath389 state having @xmath411 can exist when @xmath12 . when @xmath371 , the state becoming massless at @xmath161 will have @xmath410 and @xmath388 multiplet ( see table 1 in section 2 ) which becomes massless is changed when @xmath11 changes sign with our conventions . ] and we see that no other @xmath389 state having @xmath412 can exist when @xmath12 . this proves the unicity . exactly the same reasoning can be applied to the states @xmath413 . the equation to study is in this case @xmath414 by using again ( [ limite ] ) , we can convince ourselves , and then show rigorously , that when @xmath142 ( [ uni2 ] ) will have solutions when @xmath415 ( for @xmath370 ) or when @xmath411 ( for @xmath371 ) . this is again perfectly consistent with our previous analysis of the @xmath51 and @xmath17 charges . when @xmath370 , it is the state having @xmath388 which is massless , and we showed that no state @xmath416 with @xmath417 can exist ; when @xmath371 it is the state having @xmath418 which is massless , and we showed that no state with @xmath419 can exist . thus the @xmath1 multiplet @xmath416 is indeed unique and realizes the values @xmath388 , @xmath354 and @xmath420 as it should . finally , note that the case of the states @xmath421 and @xmath422 can be easily handled for instance by using the previous results and the @xmath176 type duality transformation ( [ periodstrans ] ) , or by repeating the same analysis as above . of course , the reasoning will not change whatever configuration of the theory you may choose , and thus we have proven the unicity of the states @xmath0 for any @xmath3 and @xmath4 relatively prime . in this theory , the solution is given by @xmath423 and @xmath424 , and the bare masses of the first and second flavours are equal to @xmath425 . the uniqueness of the @xmath0 states can then be proven exactly as for the @xmath1 theory . in particular , a @xmath426 hypermultiplet becoming massless when @xmath364 will again be associated to two other sets of states having physical charges @xmath427 and @xmath428 , or @xmath429 and @xmath430 when @xmath12 , the spin(8 ) flavour symmetry playing the same rle in this theory as @xmath1 supersymmetry in the previous case . the main novelty is that one also has to study the uniqueness of the vector @xmath6 states . again one can repeat the arguments of the preceding subsection . equation ( [ uni1 ] ) will be replaced by @xmath431 from the analysis of the preceding subsection it follows that this equation has solutions for any @xmath51 such that @xmath432 . moreover , by using the formula for @xmath45 given in appendix a , one can show that @xmath433 when @xmath434 and thus the equation ( [ uni3 ] ) will also have solutions for @xmath435 at least for some values of @xmath50 . thus , the only @xmath6 states , @xmath436 mod 2 , that might exist in the @xmath12 theory must have @xmath354 , as expected . the same reasoning works for the state @xmath6 such that @xmath437 mod 2 . however , when @xmath438 mod 2 , one can not exclude directly the states having a physical @xmath17 charge @xmath439 . this seems to be a peculiarity of the vector particles : at fixed @xmath50 , these vector particles , if they existed , would not necessarily lead to an unphysical singularity , and hence their existence can not be ruled out by this argument alone . of course , this is not really an obstacle for us . by changing @xmath50 to @xmath440 in the original configuration , we exchange @xmath185 and @xmath159 and thus states @xmath437 mod 2 with states @xmath438 mod 2 , and we can then deduce that necessarily @xmath354 for the latter states . to prove the unicity , we still have to check whether only one state exists at given @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath51 . the argument which worked for the @xmath0 states relied on the fact that any of these states can be related to a singularity appearing on the coulomb branch for some values of the coupling , and that we know the multiplicity of the states producing singularities . this clearly does not work for the @xmath6 states , which are never massless ( when @xmath364 ) and thus never produce a singularity . as an alternative , we will rely on a semiclassical analysis . in @xcite was shown that the states @xmath6 indeed exist and are unique _ for @xmath441 . _ the uniqueness of the @xmath442 states for _ any _ @xmath3 and @xmath4 relatively prime will then follow from the @xmath5 invariance of the theory , see section 8 . due to the bps mass formula ( [ bpsmass ] ) , a bps state is generically stable . central charge as well as mass conservation indeed impose tights constraints . to see this , suppose that a bps state of central charge @xmath42 decay into @xmath3 states of central charges @xmath443 . this is possible only if @xmath444 and @xmath445 of the @xmath3 relations ( [ cms1 ] ) , only @xmath446 are independent once one takes into account ( [ firstc ] ) , and thus they define a hypersurface of real codimension @xmath446 included in the coulomb branch . in our case where the gauge group is of rank one and thus the coulomb branch of real dimension two , this means that decays into two distinct particles can only occur along real curves , decays into three distinct particles at special points , and decays into four or more distinct particles are likely to be impossible . suppose we are studying the decay of a state @xmath447 into two states , one of them being @xmath448 . instead of using the original variables @xmath449 , it is convenient to use shifted variables @xmath450 such that @xmath183 . the equation for the curve of marginal stability can then be cast in the following sl@xmath15 invariant form : @xmath451 the left hand side of ( [ cmseq ] ) does not depend on the final state @xmath448 , and the right hand side is an a priori arbitrary rational number which we will denote by @xmath452 . we thus see that to a given particle @xmath447 is associated a whole family of curves of marginal stability , @xmath453 , indexed by a rational number @xmath452 . it is useful at this stage to summarize what we need to show in order to complete our goal , which is to demonstrate that the spectrum of bps states is in perfect agreement with @xmath17 duality both in the @xmath1 and massless @xmath102 theory , and also to prove the existence of the required states in the massive cases studied in section 3 . + we need to show that the states @xmath0 , where @xmath3 and @xmath4 are relatively prime integers , which we have generated by analytic continuation in the _ massive _ theories ( section 4 ) , still exist in the _ massless _ one . this will be established in section 7 using the curves of marginal stability . + we need to show that the states @xmath6 exist in the @xmath102 theory , since they represent the duals of the w bosons in this case . we did not give any argument in favour of the existence of such states up to now , since they are not associated with any singularity on the coulomb branch . however , one can establish their existence by using the general argument presented in section 8 , _ and _ by relying on the non trivial semiclassical results obtained in @xcite for states of magnetic charge 2 . + finally , we need to show that the dual of the w bosons ( and of the elementary quarks in the @xmath102 theory ) does exist in the dual theory studied in section 3.5 . there it was only shown that the existence of these states does not lead to any inconsistency . actually , these dual states exist in the massless theories , and in appendix b we will explain why they must still exist when the bare mass is increased and we follow the rg flow ( [ rgdual ] ) toward the dual pure gauge ( or massless @xmath119 ) theory . let us end this section by mentioning the formula @xmath454 which corresponds to a cp transformation . note that though this is _ not _ a duality transformation , it is still perfectly compatible with the bps mass formula ( [ bpsmass ] ) . this relation is useful to study the symmetries and some particular points of the curves of marginal stability . in this section , @xmath3 and @xmath4 are two relatively prime integers . in section 4 , strong evidence in favour of the existence of the states @xmath0 in the massless theories was given : depending on the value of the coupling @xmath50 , when the bare mass is turned on , the singularities on the coulomb branch may be due to any of these states . however , strictly speaking , the existence of the states was proven only when @xmath364 and @xmath455 . when @xmath12 and the singularities merge at @xmath456 , all the @xmath0 states become massless and thus degenerate in mass . though a brutal discontinuity in the spectrum between @xmath364 and @xmath12 seems very unlikely on physical grounds , we would like to argue that the @xmath0 states not only exist at the singularities they are responsible for , but also at other points in the @xmath46 plane . one way of doing this is to consider a configuration where the @xmath0 state becomes massless , and to study the family of curves of marginal stability associated with the decay of this state . if @xmath436 mod 2 , we have a family @xmath457 defined by ( cf ( [ cmseq ] ) ) @xmath458 and if @xmath438 mod 2 we have a family @xmath459 , @xmath460 the case of @xmath437 mod 2 is completely similar to the case @xmath436 mod 2 due to ( [ periodstrans ] ) . we have computed the curves @xmath461 numerically , using the analytic formulas for the periods presented in appendix a , and the result is depicted in figure 8 . [ figure8 ] = 14.7 cm it is easy to established , particularly in using ( [ cptrans ] ) , that the curves @xmath459 all intersect at @xmath127 and are symmetric with respect to the real @xmath46 axis , while the curves @xmath457 all intersect at @xmath129 and @xmath127 and @xmath462 . more important , these curves do not intersect at any other points than the particular ones mentioned above and form a dense set in the whole @xmath46 plane . this is not prohibitive : the complementary set , generated by the curves @xmath463 for _ irrational _ values of @xmath464 , is also a dense subset of the coulomb branch , where the corresponding state is stable . this shows that for any positive real number @xmath465 , there is always a point @xmath46 such that @xmath466 and which can be joined to the singularity @xmath131 by a curve @xmath463 where @xmath464 is taken to be irrational . as the state becoming massless at @xmath131 can not decay along such a curve , it must exist at @xmath46 . as @xmath465 can be chosen independently of @xmath11 , @xmath0 must exist in the @xmath12 theory for some @xmath466 and thus for any @xmath46 . to end this section , i wish to point out that the preceding analysis suggests that states which can not exist in the @xmath12 theory can not exist anymore in the @xmath364 theory . to understand this , assume that to the unwanted state @xmath467 is associated a point @xmath93 on the coulomb branch such that @xmath468 for any given @xmath50 and @xmath11 . , though it seems to be true numerically . ] . the family of curves of marginal stability @xmath469 associated with @xmath467 looks like the families depicted in figure 8 , except that all the curves will intersect at @xmath93 . now suppose that @xmath467 exist at a point on a curve @xmath470 with @xmath464 irrational ( such curves cover a dense subset @xmath471 of the coulomb branch ) . then move @xmath467 along this curve , reach @xmath93 where it is massless and find an inconsistency since @xmath93 is not a singular point . thus @xmath467 can not exist in the dense set @xmath471 : this means that it will never be a trully stable state in the theory . thus , if our hypothesis ( [ unsing ] ) is correct , the number of curves of marginal stability one must consider to study eventual decays in the massive theories is considerably decreased . we will use this fact in appendix b , see also [ 32 ] . in this section , we wish to address a very general problem : when can we expect the monodromy group of a given theory to correspond to an exact duality symmetry ? of course , this a priori naive statement is not always true , as seiberg and witten already pointed out in their original paper @xcite on the pure gauge theory . however , we would like it to be correct in the particular cases of the finite theories studied in this paper . we will give in the following some general physical arguments showing that this property can be understood simply by looking at some very general features of the structure of the low energy effective action . though we will restrict ourselves to very few examples , in the framework of su(2 ) gauge theories , and chosen in order to illuminate the cases of su(2 ) @xmath1 and @xmath2 , @xmath102 , the line of reasoning could a priori be applied to any @xmath2 theory . first , let us consider a theory with only one singularity on the coulomb branch . it could be the massless theories studied above . let us see why in this simple case , the monodromy @xmath166 associated with this singularity must correspond to an exact duality symmetry of the theory . to the singularity is associated a branch cut which extends to infinity and whose orientation clearly is arbitrary . by sweeping up the @xmath46 plane with such a branch cut , _ while keeping all the parameters fixed , _ we show that necessarily two theories connected by the transformation @xmath166 must be physically equivalent . this kind of argument was already presented in subsection 4.3 . in the case of @xmath1 or @xmath2 with four massless flavours , @xmath472 and the `` duality '' transformation is nothing but a gauge transformation . let us now go to a more interesting situation , suited for instance for the pure gauge theory , where two singularities are present at @xmath129 and @xmath126 with monodromies @xmath334 and @xmath473 . the theory now has an intrinsic scale @xmath87 such that @xmath474 . two scenarios can be imagined in this case . in the first one , for some reasons the naive arguments are true , and thus the monodromy group generated by @xmath334 and @xmath473 corresponds to an exact duality symmetry . in the second scenario , the two singularities combine : we choose the branch cut originating at @xmath161 to go through @xmath185 and then to coincide with the branch cut originating at @xmath185 . far away from the singularities , we thus only see a branch cut associated with a monodromy matrix @xmath475 which is the product of the two matrices @xmath316 and @xmath476 . of course the position of this branch cut extending to infinity can be chosen arbitrarily , and thus an exact duality symmetry must be associated with @xmath477 , at least when @xmath478 . in the case of the pure gauge theory , @xmath475 expresses the asymptotic freedom and is associated with the invariance of the theory under @xmath16 angle shifts . finally , let us study the case where three singularities @xmath137 are present on the coulomb branch , with monodromy matrices @xmath291 . the theory may now have one , two , or three intrinsic scales , corresponding to the distances @xmath479 between the singularities . in the @xmath2 theory with one flavour of quark , we have three singularities at equal distances from each other because of a @xmath480 symmetry acting on the coulomb branch @xcite . thus we have only one scale @xmath87 at our disposal . the same scenario as the one which prevailed for the pure gauge theory occurs , and we do not have any particular duality symmetry in this theory . now , the finite theories we are studying in this paper also have three singularities in the coulomb branch , but with the most important property that two independent scales can be introduced and _ any one of the three singularities can be chosen to be arbitrarily far from the other two . _ typically , we are studying a dual rg flow as in ( [ rgdual ] ) , and two of the three singularities ( say @xmath161 and @xmath185 ) are separated by an almost fixed distance @xmath481 while the third singularity ( @xmath159 ) runs to infinity with @xmath11 at a distance @xmath482 , where @xmath11 is the bare mass in the theory . in such a configuration , as in the case where only two singularities are present , we can not know a priori whether the monodromies @xmath316 and @xmath476 associated with the singularities at scale @xmath87 will correspond to an exact duality symmetry . however , the situation is different for the isolated singularity at scale @xmath11 . the latter can only be `` screened '' by the singularities at scale @xmath87 . we think that this is impossible , because it seems very unlikely that the low energy physics at scale @xmath87 could be influenced by a singularity at scale @xmath11 , produced by a particle which is ultra massive at scale @xmath87 ( if it exists ) , and vice - versa . one might argue that the branch cuts of the three singularities could merge at a new intrinsic scale @xmath483 . however , the physical origin of this new scale would be very unclear and we will rule out this possibility . we thus see that the only natural way to interpret the singularity structure is to admit that @xmath311 corresponds to an exact duality symmetry of the theory at least in the configuration where @xmath484 and @xmath485 with @xmath486 . from the point of view of the massless theory , which corresponds to @xmath487 , we have thus an invariance with respect to @xmath311 . the rle of the three singularities can of course be exchanged due to the sl@xmath15 invariance of the seiberg - witten curve ( [ curve ] ) , and we deduce that the @xmath12 theories have an exact duality group which contains @xmath5 . in particular , the existence of all the @xmath6 states in the @xmath7 theory will then follow from the existence of the three states @xmath111 ( the w ) , @xmath488 and @xmath489 , which were shown to exist in @xcite using the semiclassical method . in this paper , we proved rigorously that all the @xmath0 dyon states , where @xmath3 and @xmath4 are relatively prime integers , exist in the @xmath1 as well as in the @xmath2 , @xmath7 gauge theories with gauge group su(2 ) . these states were obtained by analytic continuation of the @xmath490 states which become massless at some points of the coulomb branch when the bare @xmath16 angle is zero . in the process of analytic continuation , we saw explicitly that the quantum numbers at the singularities can change according to a monodromy transformation . we also proved the unicity of the dyon states , in perfect agreement with an exact sl@xmath15 duality symmetry . we also provided a very general physical argument showing that @xmath1 and @xmath2 with four massless flavours must have an exact duality symmetry group which contains the monodromy group of the corresponding massive theories . this fact together with already known semiclassical results implies the existence of all the @xmath6 vector states in the @xmath7 theory . the line of reasoning used in this work , particularly the arguments of subsections 4.1 and 8 , is likely to be generalizable to theories having any gauge group , for instance to the case of su(n ) with @xmath491 . this may answer the open questions in these cases @xcite . from a very general point of view , our method may be seen as the physical counterpart of the string theory results based on the heterotic - type ii duality conjecture @xcite . it would be very interesting to prove the equivalence of the two approaches . in our approach , one is seeking for non singular points @xmath46 on the coulomb branch and for cycles @xmath492 on the seiberg - witten curve @xmath493 such that @xmath494 where @xmath495 is the seiberg - witten differential form , see appendix a. states @xmath0 corresponding to such a cycle @xmath496 can not exist , and any other ( hypermultiplet ) states are very likely to exist . in the string approach , stable states are associated with geodesics on @xmath497 endowed with the metric @xmath498 where @xmath73 is a particular element in the cohomology class of @xmath495 . for states lying in a @xmath2 hypermultiplet , these geodesics must begin and end at the branching points @xmath499 ( see ( [ roots ] ) in appendix a ) . a link between the two points of view is the following : it is clearly impossible to have a non - null geodesic with the required properties for a state @xmath496 satisfying ( [ conc1 ] ) , since the geodesic would have zero length and this requires its endpoints to coincide , that is to have a singularity . more important , the existence of a particular point @xmath46 such that ( [ conc1 ] ) is true is likely to prevent the existence of the corresponding geodesic for `` any '' @xmath46 , by continuity . of course subtleties are associated with the curves of marginal stability , and the vector particles may have a particular status . in any case , we believe that a complete understanding of the relationship between the two approaches is likely to provide a deeper understanding of @xmath2 theories . it is a pleasure to thank adel bilal for his permanent encouragements and many interesting discussions . his critical reading of the manuscript was also at the origin of many improvements . i also thank adam schwimmer for a useful discussion , and aurlia who kindly processed the figures . i present below some general formulas from the theory of elliptic integrals ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) in a form well suited for our purposes . by well suited , i mean first that they can be used straighforwardly to obtain the analytic solution for @xmath86 and @xmath45 actually , the same general formulas can be used to evaluate the periods of the asymptotically free theories having @xmath500 as well @xcite . second , i mean that they can easily be implemented on a computer system , and thus can be used to determine numerically the curves of marginal stability . let us consider a torus whose equation is @xmath501 in our particular case , it will be convenient to cast ( [ curve ] ) into this form by performing the change of variable @xmath502 we will then have @xmath503 the fundamental cycles on the torus ( [ curvebis ] ) are chosen as indicated in figure a.1 . [ figure9 ] = 14.7 cm to this choice for the homology basis , we associate the usual variables @xmath212 and @xmath504 : @xmath505 the fundamental periods are then given by @xmath506 where @xmath507 is the standard complete elliptic integral of the first kind . we will also need a formula involving elliptic integrals of the third kind . maybe the most convenient form for this formula is the following : @xmath508 where @xmath496 is any complex number which is different from the roots @xmath499 and @xmath509 is an integer . the @xmath510 are given by @xmath511 in terms of the complete elliptic integrals of the first and second kinds @xmath507 and @xmath512 . , @xmath513 . ] @xmath514 and @xmath515 are straightforward generalizations ( note that @xmath516 here ) of the weirstrass @xmath514 and @xmath515 functions , and may be expressed in terms of the standard jacobian and @xmath16 elliptic functions @xcite as @xmath517 finally , @xmath518 is such that @xmath519 , that is @xmath520.\ ] ] the indeterminate constant @xmath509 comes from the fact that the differential form @xmath521 has poles with residues @xmath522 . if , under a continuous deformation , the integration contour crosses such a pole , @xmath509 will be shifted by one unit . note also that the ambiguity that exists in the definition of @xmath518 , which stems from the fact that @xmath523 is a doubly periodic , even function of @xmath524 , can be absorbed in a redefinition of @xmath509 by using legendre s relation @xmath525 and the fact that @xmath526 for any integers @xmath527 and @xmath528 . it should be clear that such integrals can only appear in theories with non zero bare masses , since it is only here that jumps in @xmath86 and @xmath45 are allowed @xcite . changing @xmath509 will then simply amount to shifting the @xmath51 charge . we are now equipped to compute the seiberg - witten periods @xmath86 and @xmath45 rather straighforwardly . however , two points remain to be discussed . first , when applying the above formulas , we are not certain to obtain a solution with the correct analytic structure in the @xmath46 plane . this is explained in the next subsection where the effective coupling @xmath529 is computed . second , we must find the seiberg - witten differential , if possible in a form where the canonical decomposition in terms of the building blocks treated above is simple . this is done in subsection 5.3 . the solution is then given in 5.4 . the effective coupling @xmath530 is nothing but the modular parameter of the torus ( [ curve ] ) , and would thus naively be given by @xmath531 . however , this formula is a priori valid only modulo sl@xmath15 transformations , and some additional constraints must be found from physics . the first constraint comes from the evaluation of @xmath530 in the limit @xmath404 where it should coincide with @xmath50 , modulo @xmath16 angle redefinitions which correspond to trivial shifts of the electric charge . this constraint is indeed satisfied with our choices for the homology cycles @xmath532 and @xmath533 . the second constraint comes from the analytic structure of @xmath530 as a function of @xmath46 , which was described in section 3 in the case of a trivial bare @xmath16 angle . this analytic structure is most easily studied when one uses the explicit formulas @xmath534 and @xmath535 where the @xmath137 correspond to the positions of the singularities ( [ singpos ] ) . we then obtain a unique solution , given when @xmath273 by @xmath536 @xmath537 and @xmath399 are also very directly related to the fundamental periods @xmath538 and @xmath539 . before writing explicit formulas , one must note that though having the same monodromies , the solution for the so(3 ) and @xmath7 theories will differ by a global factor of @xmath540 which directly comes from the analysis of the massless theories . in the following , we will reserve the notation @xmath112 for the solution of the so(3 ) theory , and for @xmath7 we will have @xmath541 . with these conventions , @xmath542 and @xmath543 we now wish to integrate the relations ( [ solda],[soldad ] ) in order to obtain @xmath44 and @xmath45 . to do this , the standard method is to find a one form @xmath73 ( the so - called seiberg - witten differential ) so that @xmath544 up to an exact form . we will then compute @xmath44 and @xmath45 by mean of the formulas @xmath545 the simplest way to find @xmath73 certainly is to use , instead of the variables @xmath546 , the rescaled variables @xmath547 ) . we perform it in order to simplify the expressions . on the contrary , the use of @xmath548 instead of @xmath549 amounts to adding a non trivial exact differential to @xmath73 , which simplifies its form nicely . ] in terms of which the curve takes the form @xmath550 with @xmath551 by multiple integration by part we then obtain @xmath552 a very convenient and simple form for @xmath73 will then be @xmath553 we end our computation by writing @xmath73 in the form @xmath554 by noting that @xmath555 we can easily compute @xmath556 with @xmath557 and then apply ( [ fundperiods ] , [ i3 ] ) to find the desired solution : @xmath558,\ ] ] and @xmath559 \quad { \mathrm for}\enspace \im z\geq 0.\\ { \displaystyle\sqrt{2}\over\displaystyle\pi } \bigl [ \bigl ( z - z_{1 } \bigr)\ , ( \omega _ { 2}+2\omega _ { 1 } ) + { i\over 4}m\ , \bigl ( 2(\omega _ { 2}+2\omega _ { 1})\zeta ( u_{c } ) -4(\eta _ { 2}+2\eta _ { 1})u_{c } \bigr ) \bigr]\\ \end{array}\right.\nonumber\\ & & \hskip 8 cm { \mathrm for}\enspace \im z < 0.\\ \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] the different prescriptions for @xmath560 or for @xmath561 correspond of course to a zero @xmath16 angle . the generalization to any @xmath16 angle should be clear in view of the discussion in section 4 . [ figure10 ] = 14.7 cm in this appendix , we complete the proof of section 3 and show that the spectrum of the dual pure gauge theory ( or dual @xmath125 massless theory ) is in perfect agreement with duality . in section 3 , we already showed that the duals of the @xmath275 monopoles indeed exist outside the curve of marginal stability @xmath562 represented in figure 4 in the theory @xmath177 . in addition to these states , duality predicts the existence of the duals of the w bosons , and also of the elementary quarks in the case of the @xmath7 theory . more precisely , we need to prove that in the so(3 ) theory the state @xmath563 indeed exists for @xmath141 outside the curve @xmath562 or equivalently that @xmath564 exists for @xmath142 . in the @xmath7 theory , in addition to the preceding state ( now interpreted as being the dual of the quarks of the massless @xmath125 theory ) , we must have the @xmath565 ( or @xmath566 ) state interpreted as being the dual of the w. our strategy will be the following : as we already know that all these states exist when @xmath12 , we will simply show that they can not decay outside the curve @xmath562 when the mass is turned on and we follow the rg flow ( [ rgdual ] ) toward the dual pure gauge ( or @xmath125 ) theory . to do this , remark first that the family of curves of marginal stability associated with @xmath563 coincides with the one for @xmath565 , and that the family for @xmath567 is the symmetric of the family for @xmath563 with respect to the real @xmath46 axis . thus , we need to study only one family of curves , whose defining equations deduced from ( [ cmseq ] ) can be cast in the form @xmath568 in this equation , @xmath569 represents the physical @xmath17 charge a state produced in the decay reaction would have when @xmath12 , and @xmath570 represents the electric charge of the same state . as argued in section 7 , we will consider only @xmath569 such that @xmath571 and thus @xmath572 or @xmath573 where @xmath107 is any integer . the corresponding curves are represented in figure b.1 . as there is no curve outside @xmath562 in the lower half - plane , the state @xmath563 ( or @xmath565 ) can not decay in this region . this completes the proof . Abstract:
[ "it is shown that all the @xmath0 dyon bound states exist and are unique in @xmath1 and @xmath2 with four massless flavours supersymmetric su(2 ) yang - mills theories , where @xmath3 and @xmath4 are any relatively prime integers . the proof can be understood in the context of field theory alone , and does _ not _ rely on any duality assumption . we also give a general physical argument showing that these theories should have at least an exact @xmath5 duality symmetry , and then deduce in particular the existence of the @xmath6 vector multiplets in the @xmath7 theory . the corresponding massive theories are studied in parallel , and it is shown that though in these cases the spectrum is no longer self - dual at a given point on the moduli space , it is still in perfect agreement with an exact s duality . we also discuss the interplay between our results and both the semiclassical quantization and the heterotic - type ii string - string duality conjecture . epsf = bbm12 = bbm9 = bbm7 = = = 1= 2= 3= specialpagefalse oddhead-1.2cm3 evenheadoddhead" ]
17,784
17,784
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: most mass in the universe is in the form of dark matter , and most dark matter is gravitationally clustered in the form of halos . dark matter halos are therefore the building blocks of the universe . knowledge of the formation and evolution history of dark matter halos is essential for an understanding of the halos structure and dynamics , as well as the environment that harbors galaxies and clusters . designs for dark matter search experiments also rely on the predicted spatial and velocity distributions of dark matter particles in our own galaxy . according to the theory of structure formation in current cosmological models , dark matter halos arise from tiny primordial fluctuations seeded in the matter and radiation fields in the early universe at , for example , the end of an inflationary era . these small inhomogeneities grow via gravitational instability , with the slightly overdense regions becoming denser and the slightly underdense regions becoming emptier . at a given time , there exists a spectrum of density fluctuations over a wide range of length and mass scales , whose spatial distribution is characterized by the power density in fourier space @xmath0 , the power spectrum . dark matter halos therefore rarely form and evolve in isolation , growing instead by frequent accretion of smaller - mass halos and occasional major mergers with other halos of comparable mass . the earliest theoretical insight into cosmological halo formation came from the spherical radial infall model , which considers an isolated spherical overdense volume and describes the secondary infall of bound but initially expanding collisionless matter onto this region @xcite . if the initial density perturbation spectrum is scale - free and the velocity distribution follows the hubble law , the infall solution is found to approach a self - similar form in an einstein - de sitter universe . the resulting density profile asymptotically approaches @xmath1 with @xmath2 @xcite . the exact value of @xmath3 depends on the index of the initial perturbation spectrum @xmath4 : it is isothermal ( @xmath5 ) for @xmath6 and for @xmath7 steepens to @xmath8 @xcite or @xmath9 @xcite . the collapse of halos therefore retains memory of the initial conditions in the radial infall model . by contrast , modern cosmological n - body simulations find dark matter halos over a wide range of mass scales to follow a density profile that is nearly independent of the initial power spectrum and is shallower near the halo centers ( with @xmath10 ) than that predicted by the radial infall model @xcite . furthermore , the dark matter in the simulated halos is not entirely smoothly distributed spatially ; instead , at least 10% of the halo mass is in the form of hundreds to thousands of smaller , dense satellite halos of varying mass @xcite . thus even though the analytic similarity solutions derived from one - dimensional infall onto a smooth overdensity have provided valuable insight into the evolution of self - gravitating systems , realistic halo formation is clearly more complicated . numerical simulation has been the tool most frequently used in cosmology to study structure formation . it has provided powerful insight and occasionally surprising results ( e.g. universal density profile ) unexplainable by the simulations themselves . our understanding of structure formation can certainly be enhanced if a complementary tool is developed . complementary approaches are also especially needed at this time to help us better understand and perhaps resolve the `` cuspy halo '' and `` dwarf satellite '' problems of the cold dark matter model . in this paper we offer a new perspective on the subject of dark matter halo formation by proposing an approach different from both the radial infall model and n - body simulations . we focus on the phase - space distribution of dark matter in galaxy halos instead of on the motion of a mass shell ( as in infall models ) or the orbit of a simulation particle ( as in n - body ) . we attempt to understand the evolution of the phase - space distribution with a statistical description based on kinetic theory . our method is to be contrasted with the standard method where the individual dark matter particles are described by the collisionless boltzmann equation ; n - body simulations are in essence a monte carlo method for solving this equation . instead , we consider the phase space of dark matter particles in an average halo and develop a cosmological kinetic theory for halo evolution in the presence of a spectrum of density fluctuations . the essential features of our approach are represented by the fluctuation - dissipation theorem for time - dependent stochastic processes . to elaborate on this concept , we recall that stochastic modelling was first developed to explain the brownian motion of pollen particles suspended in a fluid . ( see [ sec : brownian ] for a more detailed discussion . ) this phenomenon is now understood to arise from a fluctuating force on a brownian particle due to many rapid collisions with the molecules in the surrounding fluid . these fluctuations cause successive small changes in the particle velocity , hence to a random walk . the consequence of many such random walks is diffusion , a form of dissipation . due to the large number of molecules , it is impossible to solve the coupled equations of motion for the trajectories of all molecules and the pollen particle in the fluid fortunately , a stochastic treatment suffices . one mathematical prescription is provided by the langevin equation @xcite , which models the forces arising from the fluctuations as a stochastic term that is added to all other deterministic forces in the equation of motion for a particle . an alternative prescription is given by the fokker - planck equation @xcite , which is an equation of motion for the probability density or distribution function of particles undergoing random walks . in this case , the collective changes in the velocities due to the fluctuations in the system are represented by a drift coefficient and a diffusion coefficient arising from the collision terms in the collisional boltzmann equation . stochastic phenomena occur beyond molecular scales . in astrophysics , the best studied example is the evolution of dense stellar systems such as globular clusters @xcite . a star in a globular cluster experiences a fluctuating force from many gravitational two - body encounters and suffers a succession of small velocity changes . the fluctuations in these systems arise from granularity in the mass distribution at the locations of the stars . the fokker - planck approximation is valid for these weak encounters . we explore this example in greater detail and contrast it with our model of galaxy halo evolution in [ sec : globular ] . the key feature common to all of these systems is the presence of stochastic fluctuations that result in dissipation . in the cosmological setting addressed by this paper , the fluctuations arise from cosmological perturbations produced in the early universe . at early times , these perturbations are gaussian and fully characterized by their power spectrum ; at late times , the substructures in halos seen in recent simulations are the nonlinear counterparts of this spectrum of early ripples . these fluctuations scatter particles . if one considers an ensemble of halos , the masses and locations of the substructures ( or their gaussian predecessors ) are random variables . the substructures thereby introduce `` noise '' into the evolution of dark matter halos . as we show in this paper , the result is dissipation in the form of drift and velocity - space diffusion . recent work has explored the use of the fokker - planck equation in cosmological problems . @xcite , for example , searched for steady - state solutions of the fokker - planck equation assuming the fluctuations arise from two - body encounters . it also assumed a simple isotropic phase space distribution dependent only on the total energy and a radial power law form for the potential and density . under these assumptions , @xcite found that @xmath11 was a steady - state solution under the effects of encounters . there was no dynamics in this work , however : the system was assumed to be in collisionless equilibrium and the nature of the clumps producing the collisions was left arbitrary . it also remains to be determined whether galaxy halos , either dark matter or stellar , actually evolve to @xmath12 cusp . @xcite examined the dynamics of halos due to stochastic fluctuations from three different noise processes for the fokker - planck scattering term : the merging clumps were assumed to fly by with constant velocity , to follow decaying orbits due to dynamical friction , or to orbit inside halos . the results of this study were promising and supported the notion that the density profiles of halos were affected by mergers and substructures . the fluctuations in this work , however , were constructed by hand instead of being self - consistently calculated , and the results about a central cusp were inconclusive . our objective here is to construct a kinetic equation in which the drift and diffusion terms are derived from realistic density fluctuations in current cosmological models . we will also retain the full phase space information by , in effect , using @xmath13 without averaging over the angular momentum or radial velocity . we also do not assume collisionless equilibrium ; instead we base our approach on exact dynamics . the organization of this paper is as follows : in 2 , we derive the kinetic equation relevant for the evolution of an average halo , starting with the collisionless boltzmann equation for individual dark matter particles . this procedure gives rise to a collision term on the right - hand side of the kinetic equation . this term represents a correlated force density and arises from fluctuations in the ensemble averaged gravitational potential due to clustering of the matter distribution . in , we introduce the concepts and physical variables needed to apply this equation to cosmological problems . the key step is in relating the phase space density @xmath14 to the probability densities of two standard variables in cosmology : the mass density @xmath15 and velocity @xmath16 . we then focus on the quasi - linear regime in which the fluctuations about the mean density and hubble flow of an isotropic and homogeneous universe are small . this focus allows us to relate @xmath15 and @xmath16 to the density and displacement fields @xmath17 and @xmath18 , which are gaussian random fields in standard cosmological models . we leave the most mathematical part of the paper to appendix [ sec : pgauss ] , where we describe how to use the statistics of constrained gaussian random fields to express the probability densities of 3 in terms of the ( constrained ) means and covariances of the density and displacement fields . the idea of a constrained field is central to this study because our aim is to construct a kinetic theory for dark matter particles that will later reside in a collapsed halo rather than at any random location in the universe . the relevant perturbations are for a density field constrained to have certain properties , e.g. , a specified height or gradient at some point in space . the spectrum for such constrained fields is related but not identical to the familiar linear power spectrum @xmath19 for unconstrained gaussian density fluctuations . in [ sec : fpeq ] , we put the final expression for the correlated force derived in appendix [ sec : pgauss ] back into the kinetic equation , and show that the resulting equation is of the fokker - planck form where one term represents a drift force and the other term represents diffusion in velocity - space . we work out these diffusion coefficients for the currently - favored cold dark matter plus a cosmological constant ( @xmath20cdm ) model , and provide explicit expressions for these coefficients in terms of the linear matter fluctuation power spectrum . we also present the results for the coefficients computed for this model . [ sec : discuss ] discusses further the physical meaning of the results in [ sec : fpeq ] . we interpret the diffusion terms by taking velocity moments of the kinetic equation . to place our cosmological kinetic equation in a broader perspective , we discuss in more detail the classical examples of brownian motion and globular clusters , and point out the similarities and differences among the three cases . [ sec : conclu ] provides a summary and conclusions . in appendix [ sec : stationary ] we investigate the relaxation to stationary solutions of our cosmological fokker - planck equation . we derive the kinetic equation for galaxy halo evolution following the methods presented by @xcite for the derivation of the bbgky hierarchy . the starting point is the one - particle phase space density for dark matter particles in a single halo , the klimontovich ( or klimontovich - dupree ) density @xcite @xmath21 \delta_{\rm d}[\vec v-\vec v_i(t)]\ ] ] where @xmath22 is the dirac delta function and the subscript k denotes the use of the klimontovich density . we suppose that each halo is made of equal - mass particles of mass @xmath23 , for example , the elementary particles of non - baryonic dark matter models . for convenience , we use velocity rather than momentum and we choose units so that @xmath24 is a mass density . we use proper coordinates except for [ sec : cosmovar ] and appendix [ sec : pgauss ] , where we will switch to the appropriate cosmological ( comoving ) coordinates . the klimontovich density is simply a way of casting the exact trajectories of all @xmath25 particles in a system into the form of a phase space density . the number of particles in @xmath26 about @xmath27 is @xmath28 , which equals either 0 or 1 . the klimontovich density consists of delta functions because , when one is dealing with a single system ( as opposed to an ensemble ) , every particle has a well - defined position and velocity . the reason for introducing this quantity is that it gives a particularly clean way of going from exact n - body dynamics to a statistical description by taking expectation values of @xmath29 or products of more than one @xmath29 over an ensemble of n - body systems . this approach to kinetic theory is different from the usual method that begins with the n - particle distribution for an ensemble . the klimontovich density obeys the klimontovich - dupree equation @xmath30 where @xmath31 for notational convenience we have grouped together all 6 phase space coordinates into @xmath32 . ( [ klim ] ) is exact , as may be verified by substituting eq . ( [ phaseden ] ) and using the equations of motion for individual particles , @xmath33 in practice , the gravitational force may be softened by modifying eq . ( [ gravec ] ) to reduce artificial two - body relaxation , as is done in n - body simulations . ( [ phaseden ] ) and ( [ klim ] ) are entirely equivalent to eqs . ( [ newton ] ) for one system . the klimontovich phase space density retains _ all _ information about a particular halo because it specifies the trajectories of all particles . ( [ phaseden])([newton ] ) are formally equivalent to a perfect n - body simulation . that is not what we want . rather than giving a perfect description of a single halo , we average over halos to obtain a statistical description of halo evolution . while it is impossible to completely describe a single galactic halo of dark matter particles , by using statistical mechanics methods we _ can _ describe the average of infinitely many halos ! before proceeding further , we make one important modification to the usual procedure in kinetic theory . ( [ newton ] ) assume that we work in an inertial frame . this is satisfactory for an isolated halo but not for a halo formed in a cosmological context where neighbors cause it to orbit in the net gravitational field produced by all matter . the center of mass of a halo typically moves much farther in a hubble time than the size of the halo itself , even in an inertial frame in which the halo begins at rest . for example , for the cold dark matter family of models , the displacement of a mass element from its initial position ( in comoving coordinates ) is typically several mpc today . if we statistically average over an ensemble of halos each of which wanders this far in a hubble time , the phase space density will be artificially smeared out , making the resulting average `` halo '' much larger than any realistic halo . we avoid this by doing the same thing that simulators do when they construct halo profiles : we work in the center - of - mass frame of each halo . indeed , at each moment the halo center - of - mass must be at rest in our reference frame . this frame is non - inertial because of the gravitational forces acting on the halo . thus we must modify the kinetic equation to apply to an accelerating frame . fortunately , the accelerations are small and the frame is extended only a few mpc , so we do not have to worry about relativistic effects . we simply include the inertial ( `` fictitious '' ) forces associated with working in an accelerating frame . we choose to define @xmath34 as the center - of - mass of each halo . transforming eqs . ( [ newton ] ) to the center - of - mass frame is very simple : we replace @xmath35 by the _ tidal _ gravitational field relative to the center of each halo , @xmath36 , and then subtract the center - of - mass velocity from the initial velocity of each particle . ( [ klim ] ) is unchanged except that @xmath35 is replaced by @xmath37 the subscript t is a reminder that this is the tidal gravitational field . now we return to the usual procedure for deriving a kinetic equation . the klimontovich density is the phase space density for a single realization of a halo . we might imagine performing many n - body simulations of different halos , each with slightly different initial conditions . if we average the klimontovich density over this ensemble of halos , the result ( at least , in the limit where the size of the ensemble becomes infinite ) is no longer a sum of delta functions but instead is a smooth _ one - particle distribution function _ : @xmath38 where angle brackets denote the ensemble average . recall that for notational convenience we have grouped all six phase space variables into @xmath39 . our goal is to derive a tractable kinetic equation for @xmath40 . the obvious next step is to take the ensemble average of eq . ( [ klim ] ) . to proceed , however , we will need the _ two - particle distribution function _ @xmath41 , which follows from averaging the product of klimontovich densities at two points : @xmath42 the delta - function term @xmath43 corresponds to the case in which the two points lie on top of one particle . two distinct particles give the @xmath44 term , which may always be written as a product term plus a two - particle correlation : @xmath45 this equation defines the two - point correlation function in phase space , @xmath46 . the averaging we perform is similar to the averaging used in defining ordinary clustering correlation functions in cosmology . the differences here are that we are not averaging over arbitrary systems but only over those that lead to formation of a halo at @xmath34 , and that we retain velocity information . had we averaged over all space and integrated over velocities , we would have gotten @xmath47 and @xmath48 where @xmath49 is the cosmic mean mass density and @xmath50 is the usual spatial two - point correlation function . now , by taking the ensemble average of eq . ( [ klim ] ) we arrive at a kinetic equation for the evolution of the average halo phase space density @xcite : @xmath51 where we define the ensemble - averaged tidal field @xmath52 and the correlated force density @xmath53=-g\int d^6w'\,f_{2c}(\vec w , \vec w^{\,\prime},t)\left(\frac{\vec r-\vec r^{\,\prime}}{\vert \vec r-\vec r^{\,\prime}\vert^3}+\frac{\vec r^{\,\prime}}{\vert \vec r^{\,\prime}\vert^3}\right)\ .\ ] ] the covariance of two random variables is denoted @xmath54\equiv \l ( a-\l a \r)(b-\l b \r)\r = \langle ab\rangle-\langle a\rangle\langle b\rangle$ ] . the product of @xmath55 and @xmath29 involves a product of two klimontovich densities , for which we have used eqs . ( [ f2 ] ) and ( [ f2c ] ) . the one - particle discreteness term in eq . ( [ f2 ] ) makes no contribution because the particle has no self - force . ( [ boltzeq ] ) is the first bbgky hierarchy equation @xcite . in cosmological applications this equation is usually derived starting from the liouville equation for the n - particle distribution function . in order to clarify the averaging that is done here , we have started instead from the one - particle klimontovich density . the result , eq . ( [ boltzeq ] ) , is an evolution equation that looks very much like eq . ( [ klim ] ) . by averaging over halos , however , we have introduced a correlation integral term on the right - hand side . the _ average _ halo therefore does not evolve according to the vlasov equation ; instead , it evolves according to a kinetic equation with an effective collision term . ( [ boltzeq])([g2 ] ) are exact . no approximation has been made yet . ( [ boltzeq ] ) is a continuity equation for density in phase space . without the right - hand side , it says that phase space density is conserved along trajectories given by eq . ( [ newton ] ) modified for the tidal force . the right - hand side gives a correction due to the fact that fluctuations about the ensemble average lead to correlated forces . as we will see , the effects of these fluctuations lead to dissipation . because the correction term is a divergence , the mass density @xmath56 is not dissipated but instead is conserved . in most applications of kinetic theory , the right - hand side of eq . ( [ boltzeq ] ) arises from particle collisions . in the usual treatment of a gas of particles with short - range forces , one assumes @xmath57 always except during particle collisions . this is the assumption of molecular chaos that boltzmann introduced to derive his celebrated kinetic equation . our situation , however , is different : we can not neglect @xmath46 , because it can be much larger than the single - particle term in eq . ( [ f2c ] ) due to strong gravitational clustering . heuristically , @xmath46 describes the substructure within a galaxy halo at the two - point level . ( higher order correlation functions would be needed for a complete description . ) current cosmological models and observations imply that the initial density field has fluctuations that cause the formation of many small halos which subsequently merge into present - day halos . the lumpiness of the matter distribution represents a fluctuation about the ensemble average density field . through the correlated force density @xmath58 , these fluctuations cause changes in the energy and angular momentum of individual particle orbits that are important for the evolution of the one - particle distribution function . ( [ boltzeq ] ) is useful only if we find an expression for @xmath46 . one way to proceed would be to derive a kinetic equation for @xmath46 by taking the ensemble average of eq . ( [ klim ] ) multiplied by the klimontovich density . this leads to the second bbgky equation , which depends on the three - point correlation in phase space , which obeys the third bbgky equation , and so on . thus we either have an infinite chain of coupled equations of increasing dimensionality , or we must close the system . @xcite handled this problem in their study of gravitational clustering by writing the three - point function in terms of products of two - point functions . we will proceed differently , by seeking to close the hierarchy at the first level , eq . ( [ boltzeq ] ) . to summarize this section , we have derived a formally exact evolution equation for the average halo . the one - particle phase space density is conserved up to a fluctuating force term arising from the two - point correlation function in phase space . physically this term represents the effects of substructure within and around halos , which scatter particles to new orbits . in the next two sections , we will show that we can in fact express @xmath46 in terms of the one - particle phase space density @xmath40 using a relation that is exact to second order in cosmological perturbation theory . this relation will enable us to close the first bbgky hierarchy . solving our evolution equation in eqs . ( [ boltzeq])([g2 ] ) requires specifying the phase space density @xmath40 at an initial time and the two - particle correlation @xmath46 at all times . in this section we show how to compute these quantities from the probability distributions of mass density and velocity at one and two points in space . we wish to derive expressions that would relate @xmath59 and @xmath60 to probability distributions of mass density and velocity , because these latter quantities are naturally specified by a cosmological model for structure formation . the method is to examine the mass and momentum in a small volume of space and to construct ensemble averages of the klimontovich density using the probability distribution of density and velocity . we use the symbol @xmath61 to refer to the probability density with respect to its arguments , where the joint probability distribution for @xmath62 is @xmath63 . we assume that these probability distributions are always normalized to unit total probability . the variables relevant for this paper are the densities @xmath15 and velocities @xmath64 at two points @xmath65 and at one time @xmath66 : @xmath67 , @xmath68 , @xmath69 , and @xmath70 . initially we assume that the velocity field in a given realization is single - valued in space . we use the following probability distributions : @xmath71 where the different probability densities are related to one another by @xmath72 these probability distributions depend on time but we suppress the @xmath66-dependence for clarity . for a small volume in phase space , @xmath73 equals the mean mass contained in @xmath74 . the same quantity can be calculated by averaging @xmath75 over density at fixed velocity using @xmath76 , i.e. , @xmath77 . equating the results gives @xmath78 we have used the conditional probability density @xmath79 to define the conditional mean @xmath80 . note that the probability densities depend on @xmath81 through @xmath82 and @xmath83 , so eq . ( [ f1p ] ) yields the desired one - particle phase space dependence on @xmath84 . this argument is easily extended to the two - point phase space density , using the joint probability distribution of density and velocity at two points . as eq . ( [ g2 ] ) shows , we need @xmath85 , which depends on @xmath86 but not @xmath87 , i.e. , we need the velocity at only one point . recalling that @xmath88 , we obtain @xmath89\nonumber\\ & = & \int_0^\infty d\rho_1\,\rho_1\int_0^\infty d\rho_2\,\rho_2 \left[p(\rho_1,\rho_2\vert\vec v_1)-p(\rho_1\vert\vec v_1 ) p(\rho_2)\right]\,p(\vec v_1)\nonumber\\ & = & \left[\left\langle\rho_1\rho_2\vert\vec v_1\right\rangle -\left\langle\rho_1\vert\vec v_1\right\rangle\left\langle \rho_2\right\rangle\right]\,p(\vec v_1)\ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] although we have derived eqs . ( [ f1p ] ) and ( [ f2cp ] ) assuming a single - valued velocity field in each realization , they are also valid when there is a distribution of velocities at each point . one simply interprets @xmath90 as the total mass density while @xmath86 is a single particle velocity . therefore these equations are fully general . at high redshift , before dark matter halos formed , the density and velocity fields were only slightly perturbed from a uniformly expanding cosmological model . it is thought that the fluctuations of density and velocity responsible for all cosmic structure were gaussian random fields produced during the inflationary era of the very early universe . these fluctuations provide us with both the initial conditions and the random element leading to a probabilistic description for halo formation . our goal now is to obtain expressions for eqs . ( [ f1p ] ) and ( [ f2cp ] ) at early times while the density fluctuations are small . before proceeding further , we review the description of density and velocity fields at high redshift in an almost uniformly expanding cosmological model . first , the mean expansion is described by the cosmic expansion scale factor @xmath91 which is related to the redshift by @xmath92 . the hubble expansion rate is @xmath93 . the matter contributes a fraction @xmath94 to the closure density . we account for the mean expansion by defining new coordinates conventionally called comoving coordinates : @xmath95 . adopting the standard cosmological model , we assume that the dark matter is cold . this assumption means that the velocity field is single - valued in space at early times before halos form . we can then write the density field @xmath15 and velocity field @xmath16 in terms of perturbations @xmath17 and @xmath18 around a uniformly expanding background : @xmath96\ , \quad \vec v(\vec r , t)=h(t)\left[\vec r+b(t)\vec\psi(\vec x , t)\right]\ .\ ] ] here @xmath97^{0.6}$ ] is the growth rate for density fluctuations with time - dependence @xmath98 . we emphasize that eq . ( [ pertdv ] ) does not assume that the density fluctuations are small ; it only assumes that the velocity field is single - valued . we are implicitly assuming that all of the matter may be described as a single cold non - interacting fluid ( i.e. we assume that baryons move like cold dark matter over the length scales of interest ) . the computation of the functions @xmath91 , @xmath99 , @xmath100 , @xmath101 , and @xmath102 is standard in cosmology and will not be described here . at early times when @xmath103 , mass conservation relates the density and velocity perturbation fields by @xmath104 , or @xmath105 now we make a crucial step by changing variables from @xmath106 used previously to @xmath107 . the reason for doing so is that the description in comoving coordinates @xmath108 and perturbation variables @xmath18 and @xmath17 is much simpler in the small perturbation limit . following the notation in 3.1 , we write @xmath109 , @xmath110 , and @xmath111 . these variables have normalized joint probability densities @xmath112 , @xmath113 , and @xmath114 in analogy with eqs . ( [ probs ] ) and ( [ pdfs ] ) . to change variables from @xmath115 to @xmath116 , we use @xmath117 , @xmath118 , and @xmath119 . ( [ f1p ] ) then becomes @xmath120 p(\vec\psi_1 ) \ , ( hb)^{-3}\ , \ ] ] where @xmath121 and @xmath122 is the conditional distribution of @xmath123 . similarly , eq . ( [ f2cp ] ) becomes @xmath124p(\vec\psi_1)(hb)^{-3}\ .\ ] ] although the derivation of eqs . ( [ f1p1a ] ) and ( [ f2cp1a ] ) assumed that the velocity field is single - valued , they are valid in general provided that one interprets @xmath123 and @xmath125 as total mass density perturbations ( not necessarily small ) while @xmath126 is proportional to the single particle velocity . ( [ f1p1a ] ) and ( [ f2cp1a ] ) are equivalent to eqs . ( [ f1p ] ) and ( [ f2cp ] ) expressed in different variables . their utility becomes evident in appendix [ sec : pgauss ] where we evaluate the probability distributions of density and velocity in cosmological models . all that remains is to calculate the expectation values in eqs . ( [ f1p1a ] ) and ( [ f2cp1a ] ) and to substitute the latter into eq . ( [ g2 ] ) . this calculation is somewhat complicated and is presented in appendix [ sec : pgauss ] . part of the complication arises because of an important detail we have so far neglected : halos form preferentially in regions that are initially overdense . our calculations assume that a halo forms at @xmath127 . consequently we should not evaluate the expectation values for arbitrary points in space but rather for those that satisfy appropriate constraints . strictly speaking it is impossible to specify in advance the regions that will form halos in a cosmological model with random initial fluctuations because the dynamics of gravitational clustering is too complicated . a simple model , however , has been found to give reasonable agreement with numerical simulations : halos form at maxima of the smoothed initial density field @xcite . these constraints are found to modify the expectation values in eqs . ( [ f1p1a ] ) and ( [ f2cp1a ] ) . to emphasize the application of constraints , we rewrite these expectation values with a subscript @xmath128 : @xmath129 p(\vec\psi_1 ) \ , ( hb)^{-3}\ , \ ] ] and @xmath130p(\vec\psi_1)(hb)^{-3}\ .\ ] ] eqs . ( [ f1p1 ] ) and ( [ f2cp1 ] ) are the main results of this section . we will use them to specify the initial conditions on @xmath40 and to determine the correlated force density in eq . ( [ g2 ] ) . the next step is to evaluate the necessary constrained expectation values using the standard cosmological model . we present the details of this calculation in appendix [ sec : pgauss ] , where we choose to err on the side of simplicity by following @xcite and using only the zeroth and first derivatives of the smoothed initial density field @xmath131 as constraints . detailed comparison has shown that this simple model does not predict perfectly all halo formation sites @xcite , and more complicated constraints work better , e.g. @xcite . the procedure of appendix [ sec : pgauss ] can presumably be extended to incorporate more complicated constraints . after having devoted [ sec : dfgauss ] and appendix [ sec : pgauss ] to probability and statistics we are now ready to return to the kinetic equation in [ sec : kinetic ] and write down an explicit expression for the correlated force density @xmath132 on the right - hand - side of the kinetic equation ( [ boltzeq ] ) . the approach we have followed is exact rather than phenomenological our starting point was the first bbgky hierarchy equation , an exact kinetic equation . the only approximation we have made is to assume that the density and velocity fields are gaussian random fields . the resulting two - particle correlation function , eq . ( [ f2cexact ] ) , depends in a simple way on the one - particle distribution @xmath133 . as we will show next , this simple dependence leads to the fokker - planck equation . this is a remarkable and non - trivial result . the fokker - planck equation is a great simplification of the exact and intractable bbgky hierarchy . usually the fokker - planck equation is _ assumed _ to hold a priori , and then its diffusion coefficients are estimated . here , on the other hand , we have _ derived _ the fokker - planck equation . along with it we obtain the diffusion coefficients in the quasi - linear regime , as follows . substituting eq . ( [ f2cexact ] ) into eq . ( [ g2 ] ) using eq . ( [ f2cp ] ) , converting to comoving coordinates , using eq . ( [ linpsi ] ) to relate @xmath18 to @xmath16 , and using eq . ( [ f1lin ] ) , to third order in @xmath17 we get @xmath134 \,f \right . \nonumber\\ & & + \left . ( hb ) \left [ c(\vec\psi,\vec\psi\,)-c(\vec\psi_0,\vec\psi\ , ) -\langle\vec\psi\,\rangle_c\otimes c(\delta,\vec\psi\ , ) \right ] \cdot\frac{\partial f}{\partial\vec v}\right\}+o(\delta^4)\ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the covariance matrices @xmath128 of variables @xmath17 and @xmath18 are given in eqs . ( [ covfun ] ) and ( [ c0 ] ) . here , @xmath135 and @xmath136 . note that all the terms with subscript 0 arise from our use of the tidal field rather than the total gravitational acceleration . substituting eq . ( [ g2lin ] ) into eq . ( [ boltzeq ] ) , in proper coordinates our kinetic equation in the quasilinear regime reduces to the fokker - planck equation @xmath137 specified by a vector field @xmath138 and a tensor field @xmath139 . together , @xmath138 and @xmath139 are called diffusion coefficients . heuristically , @xmath138 represents a drift force ( @xmath140 has units of acceleration ) while @xmath139 represents the diffusive effects of fluctuating forces . the flux density in velocity space is @xmath141 . keeping only terms up to second order in the density perturbations , these quantities are given by @xmath142 \nonumber\\ & = & - \hbox{cov}(\delta,\vec g_0\vert\vec\psi\ , ) = \hbox{cov}(\delta,\vec g_{\rm t}\vert\vec v\,)\end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath143 in eqs . ( [ driftlin ] ) and ( [ difflin ] ) we have also used the fact that in the quasilinear regime the peculiar gravity and displacement are related by @xmath144 @xcite , and the tidal field is @xmath145 , where @xmath146 . in writing the second line of eq . ( [ driftlin ] ) we have used eq . ( [ covy ] ) with @xmath147 and @xmath148 . thus , @xmath149 should be understood to be subject to the same extremum or other constraints as e.g. the constrained covariance function @xmath150 . the displacement and velocity are related by the second of eqs . ( [ pertdv ] ) . thus , in linear theory @xmath151 so that conditioning on @xmath16 makes the fluctuation in @xmath35 vanish , allowing us to replace @xmath152 by @xmath153 in eq . ( [ driftlin ] ) . in all cases , the covariances are taken subject to the extremum constraints discussed in appendix [ sec : pgauss ] . it is worth noting that had we used the total gravitational acceleration @xmath154 instead of the tidal field @xmath155 , the drift vector @xmath138 would have been zero and @xmath156 would have been larger . we conclude that tidal effects are crucial for a proper description of halo evolution @xcite . this is evident in the final expressions for @xmath138 and @xmath139 . after the lengthy derivations , these expressions are remarkably simple , suggesting that they may have greater validity than the case of small - amplitude gaussian fluctuations that we have analyzed here . in going from eqs . ( [ f1lin ] ) and ( [ g2lin ] ) to eqs . ( [ driftlin ] ) and ( [ difflin ] ) we have dropped the contributions made by @xmath157 and @xmath158 because they do not contribute at second order in @xmath17 . at this order , @xmath138 and @xmath139 are independent of the value of the smoothed density @xmath159 used for the constraint . however , the constraint enters in third order . carrying out the derivation to one higher order in @xmath17 requires using the following result for gaussian random variables : @xmath160 . applying this with @xmath161 , after some algebra we find @xmath162 although these results are correct for gaussian fluctuations to third order in the density perturbations , nonlinear evolution will generate non - vanishing irreducible three - point correlations ( i.e. , non - gaussianity ) that have been neglected here . for example , nonlinear evolution generates corrections to the zeldovich approximation so that velocity and gravity are no longer proportional to each other as we have assumed . for this reason , eqs . ( [ diffuns ] ) should not be regarded as being more accurate than eqs . ( [ driftlin ] ) and ( [ difflin ] ) . despite their limitations , eqs . ( [ diffuns ] ) are useful in showing the qualitative effect of applying an initial constraint . choosing the proto - halo to have @xmath163 means that typically @xmath164 in the proto - halo , which decreases @xmath138 and @xmath165 compared with eqs . ( [ driftlin ] ) and ( [ difflin ] ) . conversely , the diffusion coefficients are enhanced in void regions . note also that the constraint value appears explicitly in the initial conditions for @xmath40 in the linear regime through the term @xmath166 in eq . ( [ f1lin ] ) . ( [ driftlin ] ) and ( [ difflin ] ) imply that , in the quasilinear regime , the drift and diffusivity are independent of the velocity within the halo . ( although @xmath138 is equivalent to a covariance at fixed @xmath16 , it is independent of the particular value of @xmath16 . ) this follows because @xmath46 depends on @xmath167 only through @xmath133 and @xmath168 in eq . ( [ f2cexact ] ) . as noted above , at second order in perturbation theory the drift and diffusivity are also independent of the initial overdensity of the peak @xmath159 ( but they depend on the smoothing scale used to find extrema ) . thus , both the fokker - planck equation and the diffusion coefficients appear to be remarkably robust quantities . to make further use of eqs . ( [ driftlin ] ) and ( [ difflin ] ) , we need to write out the coefficients explicitly . using eqs . ( [ covfun ] ) , ( [ driftlin ] ) , and ( [ difflin ] ) we first factor out the dependence on cosmology by writing [ adscaled ] @xmath169 \,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath170 and @xmath171 are scaled radial and tangential diffusion coefficients . the scaled variables are [ coeffs ] @xmath172\right\ } \ , \label{scala}\\ d_r(r , t ) & = & c_r(r ) - \frac{d\gamma(r)}{dr}= \sigma_\psi^2-\frac{d\gamma(r)}{dr}-\left[\frac{r\bar\eta(r ) } { \sigma_0}\right]^2-\left[\frac{\bar\xi(r)-2\bar\eta(r)}{\sigma_1 } \right]^2\ , \label{scaldr}\\ d_t(r , t ) & = & c_t(r ) - \frac{\gamma(r)}{r}= \sigma_\psi^2-\frac{\gamma(r)}{r}-\left[\frac{\bar\eta(r)}{\sigma_1 } \right]^2 \ . \label{scaldt}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath173 is the comoving distance from the center of the halo . the time dependence arises only because the functions appearing in eqs . ( [ coeffs ] ) depend on the time - dependent power spectrum of density fluctuations . these functions are summarized here for convenience : [ sumfun ] @xmath174 where we recall that @xmath175 and @xmath176 are the covariances of the constraints @xmath159 and @xmath177 defined in eqs . ( [ varcon ] ) , and @xmath178 is a smoothing window defined in eqs . ( [ smoothdel ] ) and ( [ window ] ) . we use the gaussian window @xmath179 . to gain some insight into the significance of these results , let us consider a proto - halo at high redshift . if we suppose that the gravity field is dominated by its small - scale components , we may replace @xmath180 by @xmath35 . if we further ignore the effects of initial constraints , in linear theory @xmath181 where @xmath182 is the one - dimensional velocity dispersion . in one realization , the forces are deterministic , but taken across the ensemble they are random and fluctuating . a diffusivity @xmath183 implies that these fluctuations cause the typical particle to change its velocity by order itself in about a hubble time . there is also a net drift force @xmath138 with a dissipative timescale of about @xmath184 dynamical times , where @xmath17 is a typical magnitude of the density fluctuations . as a result , friction and diffusion will significantly alter halos within a hubble time of their collapse at high redshift . we conclude that it is not valid to model halos using the spherically symmetric vlasov equation . this conclusion has also been reached previously by @xcite . to summarize , eqs . ( [ fplin])([difflin ] ) , and their more detailed version , eqs . ( [ adscaled])([sumfun ] ) , are the main results of this subsection . ( [ fplin ] ) has the standard form of a fokker - planck equation . the fokker - planck form arises naturally and eqs . ( [ driftlin])([difflin ] ) are exact for gaussian fluctuations up to second order in perturbation theory . the diffusion coefficients @xmath138 and @xmath139 are due to fluctuations in the gravitational field over the ensemble of halos . the drift vector @xmath140 represents a source of gravitational acceleration in addition to the acceleration @xmath180 produced by the mean matter distribution . the diffusion term @xmath185 causes the temperature ( i.e. velocity dispersion ) to increase ( for a positive definite @xmath139 ) . having derived analytic expressions for the diffusion coefficients in the previous subsection , we now evaluate them for the currently favored cosmological model at high redshift . figures [ fig : friction ] and [ fig : diffusion ] show @xmath186 , @xmath170 , and @xmath171 as a function of radius @xmath173 ( measured from the halo center ) for a range of gaussian smoothing lengths @xmath187 in @xmath178 . we obtain these results by numerically integrating eqs . ( [ coeffs ] ) and ( [ sumfun ] ) with the linear power spectrum @xmath19 for a flat @xmath20cdm cosmological model with @xmath188 . the figures show a number of interesting features . first , the diffusion coefficients are negative over some regions of radius for some parameters . as we will show below , @xmath138 is the gravitational acceleration on particles in the halo caused by drift . if the friction were produced by the chandrasekhar mechanism of tidal wakes , one would expect @xmath189 ( see [ sec : globular ] ) . however , here @xmath138 is independent of @xmath16 and the particle mass . the source of friction is not the tidal wake of a flow past a moving massive particle . instead it is the fluctuations of the gravitational field of a gaussian random process , and these fluctuations can lead to a radially outward or inward force . we discuss this further in [ sec : discuss ] . more surprising at first is the fact that the diffusivities @xmath170 and @xmath171 can be negative . negative diffusivity causes the velocity dispersion ( or temperature ) to decrease , indicating an instability . such behavior is possible for gravitational systems . in fact , this result is to be expected in the quasilinear regime of gravitational instability because second - order perturbations enhance gravitational collapse of dark matter halos @xcite . in the strongly nonlinear regime , after halo virialization , we expect the diffusivities to become positive . to elucidate the origin of the negative diffusivity , we show in figures [ fig : fig3 ] and [ fig : fig4 ] that once the extremum constraint @xmath190 is removed ( by setting @xmath191 ) , we obtain @xmath192 and @xmath193 for all radii . the extremum constraint is therefore crucial to generating positive @xmath186 and negative diffusivity seen in figures [ fig : friction ] and [ fig : diffusion ] . this effect is easy to understand : if one stands at a random place in a gaussian field , nonlinear effects can speed up or slow down gravitational collapse . gravitational instability , however , speeds up the evolution in the vicinity of a density extremum . another obvious systematic effect with the diffusion coefficients in figures [ fig : friction ] and [ fig : diffusion ] is their dependence on the smoothing radius @xmath187 used to set the initial constraints . for the power spectrum assumed here , the maximum of @xmath186 occurs at about @xmath194 . in the limit @xmath195 , the variances @xmath175 and @xmath176 diverge , causing the constraint terms in the diffusion coefficients ( i.e. , those terms proportional to @xmath196 and @xmath197 ) to vanish . figure [ fig : diffusion ] shows that the diffusivity is isotropic at the halo center but shows radial anisotropy outside the center . at small radii the tangential diffusivity is larger in absolute value than the radial diffusivity . tangential diffusion gives the infalling matter angular momentum . our treatment therefore provides a new statistical description of the growth of angular momentum by tidal torques @xcite and may enable in principle an explanation for the universal angular momentum profile found recently by @xcite . it is instructive to work out analytically the asymptotic behavior of the functions in eqs . ( [ coeffs ] ) for small and large @xmath173 . for small @xmath173 we find , [ difcosmallr ] @xmath198 \right\ } + o(r^3 ) \\ d_r(r , t ) & = & -\left[\frac{\bar\eta(0)}{\sigma_1}\right]^2 + r^2 \left [ \frac{1}{10}\sigma_\delta^2 + \frac{3}{5}\alpha \bar\eta(0 ) -\left(\frac{\bar\eta(0)}{\sigma_0 } \right)^2 \right ] + o(r^4 ) \ , \\ d_t(r , t ) & = & -\left[\frac{\bar\eta(0)}{\sigma_1}\right]^2 + r^2 \left [ \frac{1}{30}\sigma_\delta^2 + \frac{1}{5}\alpha \bar\eta(0 ) \right ] + o(r^4 ) \ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have defined @xmath199 eqs . ( [ difcosmallr ] ) show that if @xmath200 is finite , then as @xmath201 , @xmath186 drops to zero while @xmath170 and @xmath171 approach a negative constant as discussed above , @xmath202 . this central value is decreased as the smoothing scale is decreased ( i.e. higher @xmath203 and @xmath204 ) as shown in figure [ fig : diffusion ] . as @xmath195 , we have @xmath205 and @xmath206 as long as @xmath207 as @xmath208 . in the limit @xmath206 ( no extremum constraint ) , @xmath170 and @xmath171 are non - negative everywhere ( cf . figs . 2 and 4 ) . thus , negative diffusivity ( instability ) is produced by constraining the slope of the density field . constraints have the opposite effect on @xmath186 : as the comparison of figures 1 and 3 confirms , the contributions to @xmath186 from constraint terms are positive . for large @xmath173 , both @xmath209 and @xmath210 approach @xmath211 , and @xmath212 ( assuming @xmath213 as @xmath214 ) , so @xmath215 figure [ fig : diffusion ] shows that @xmath170 rises slightly above @xmath216 at a few hundred mpc ( for the standard model power spectrum ) before reaching @xmath216 . this is because @xmath217 and @xmath218 is negative for this range of @xmath173 . the drift @xmath219 approaches zero at large @xmath173 . in practice , the large-@xmath173 limit is unimportant because halo infall occurs only from within about 10 mpc . another way to gain insight into the diffusion coefficients is to examine their behavior for scale - free spectra @xmath4 . many of the integrals are analytic in this case . we define a set of functions @xmath220 the integral converges for @xmath221 . using properties of the spherical bessel functions @xmath222 , we obtain the following useful relations : [ glrel ] @xmath223 we also use the following relation , valid for @xmath221 : @xmath224^{-1}\ .\ ] ] for gaussian - tapered power - law spectrum @xmath225 and gaussian smoothing @xmath226 , eqs . ( [ sumfun ] ) give , for @xmath227 and @xmath228 , [ sumfunp ] @xmath229 here , @xmath230 is euler s constant . for a pure power - law spectrum with @xmath231 , @xmath232 and @xmath211 diverge at long wavelength . however , eqs . ( [ dr00 ] ) and ( [ dt00 ] ) are valid for @xmath228 . for @xmath231 , @xmath233 in eq . ( [ scala ] ) . for @xmath234 , @xmath211 converges at long wavelength but diverges at short wavelength with @xmath235 as @xmath227 . the limiting behavior of @xmath236 and @xmath237 are given by [ limbarfun ] @xmath238\ , & r\ll r\ , \\ -ng_1(n+2)\,r^{-(n+3)}\ , & r\gg r\ , \end{cases } \label{barxiap}\\ \bar\eta(r ) & \approx & b\begin{cases } \frac{1}{6}\gamma\left(\frac{n+3}{2}\right)\left(\frac{r } { \sqrt{2}}\right)^{-(n+3)}\left[1-\frac{(n+3)}{10}\frac{r^2 } { r^2}+o(r^4)\right]\ , & r\ll r\ , \\ g_1(n+2)\,r^{-(n+3)}\ , & r\gg r\ . \end{cases } \label{baretaap}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for all @xmath239 , these functions obey the relation @xmath240 . the drift coefficient is plotted in figure [ fig : a - power ] for @xmath241 . as expected from the previous section , constraints make @xmath186 more positive . for power - law spectra , however , @xmath200 diverges so one can not use eqs . ( [ difcosmallr ] ) to obtain the behavior as @xmath242 . the exact results here show that for @xmath243 , @xmath244 as @xmath242 . for @xmath245 , @xmath246 as @xmath247 . these results show that models with lots of small - scale power and substructure ( @xmath248 as @xmath208 ) have a strong inward drift force , while models that are smoother on small scales ( @xmath245 ) have negligible drift force as @xmath242 . this is easy to understand qualitatively in the context of halo formation . density fields with lots of substructure have a nonspherical mass distribution , with mass concentrated into subhalos . for a given halo , the mass between @xmath249 and @xmath173 , for example , is concentrated into overdense substructures whose gravity field on infalling particles is stronger , on average , than if this mass were uniformly distributed over a spherical shell as it is for the average halo . given a density correlation function that rises with decreasing @xmath173 , there is a greater concentration of such clumps interior to @xmath173 than outside of @xmath173 , leading to a net inward drift force . figure [ fig : d - power ] shows the radial and tangential diffusivity for power - law spectra with @xmath231 . for @xmath234 the diffusivity diverges because the velocity dispersion @xmath211 diverges as @xmath208 . for @xmath250 the divergence is logarithmic resulting in a logarithmic dependence of @xmath170 and @xmath171 on radius . figure [ fig : d - power ] shows that the effect of the constraints is to increase the diffusivity at radii within a few smoothing lengths of the peak . as we noted above , constraints on the density gradient make the diffusivities negative as @xmath242 . for @xmath231 the diffusivities continue to rise with increasing @xmath173 because @xmath211 diverges as @xmath214 . for the physical power spectrum used in figures [ fig : friction ] and [ fig : diffusion ] , @xmath211 converges at both small and large @xmath251 , so the asymptotic behavior is different . the use of the fokker - planck equation to describe dark matter clustering is novel . in order to gain insight into what this approach may reveal , in this section we examine the fokker - planck equation from several different perspectives . the fokker - planck equation describes relaxation processes in a weakly collisional fluid . in this regard it is similar to the boltzmann equation , in which the right - hand side of eq . ( [ boltzeq ] ) is replaced by a two - body collision integral that is bilinear in the one - particle distribution function . the present situation is physically very different however `` collisions '' are not due to individual particles but rather to the gravity field of density fluctuations in a gaussian random field . nevertheless , we can borrow one of the techniques used to gain insight into the boltzmann equation , viz . velocity moments , to obtain a clear physical interpretation of the meaning of the fokker - planck equation and the diffusion coefficients @xmath138 and @xmath139 . moment equations are obtained by multiplying eq . ( [ fplin ] ) by powers of @xmath252 and integrating over velocity . the three lowest moments give the mass density @xmath15 , fluid velocity @xmath253 , and velocity dispersion tensor @xmath254 : [ momdef ] @xmath255 here we are using physical ( proper ) spatial coordinates rather than comoving coordinates . the density , velocity , and velocity dispersion tensor obey the following equations : [ momeqs ] @xmath256 the first equation is the usual fluid continuity equation . the second is the usual euler equation , except that the pressure is generalized to a matrix @xmath257 because the spatial stress need not be diagonal for a collisionless fluid . the right - hand side has two force terms : the gravitational tidal field @xmath180 produced by @xmath258 , and the drift acceleration @xmath259 caused by the correlated fluctuations of the mass density field . the third equation introduces a tensor @xmath260 , which is defined exactly like @xmath254 except the integrand in eq . ( [ thetadef ] ) acquires an additional factor @xmath261 . ( [ heat ] ) is a generalized heat equation , which requires a little more discussion . the velocity dispersion tensor @xmath254 generalizes the temperature of an isotropic gas to the case of an anisotropic velocity distribution . for an isotropic gas with @xmath262 ( here @xmath263 has units of @xmath264 ) and @xmath265 , this equation takes the more familiar form @xmath266 where @xmath267 is the heat flux . the velocity gradient terms in eq . ( [ heat ] ) generalize the @xmath268 term ( i.e. , the @xmath269 term ) of eq . ( [ isoheat ] ) to an anisotropic velocity distribution . for a perfect gas , the heat flux term is absent because the maxwellian velocity distribution has vanishing skewness . for an imperfect or collisionless gas , however , the third moment of the velocity distribution generates a generalized heat flux @xmath270 . notice that the heating rate is given not by the heat flux but instead by its divergence . for a weakly imperfect gas , the heat flux can be approximated ( e.g. in the chapman - enskog expansion approach ) by a conductive flux @xmath271 where @xmath272 is the conductivity , but for a collisionless gas , @xmath260 can not be obtained simply from @xmath15 , @xmath253 , and @xmath254 . thus , eqs . ( [ momeqs ] ) do not form a closed system . this is precisely why we must use a phase space description for a collisionless gas instead of trying to modify the fluid equations . ( [ momeqs ] ) and ( [ isoheat ] ) , however , are pedagogically useful in showing us how to interpret @xmath138 and @xmath139 . the velocity diffusivity tensor @xmath273 appears as a new term in the anisotropic heat equation , with no familiar counterpart in the dynamics of a collisional gas . although @xmath273 comes from a _ diffusion _ ( i.e. , gradient ) term in _ phase space _ , it appears as a direct _ local heating _ term in _ real space _ ( i.e. , coordinate space @xmath274 ) . diffusion in velocity space is equivalent to local heating : the temperature increases when particles spread out in velocity at a given point in space . the diffusion occurs in velocity space not in real space . the presence of this term begs the question : where does the energy come from ? from the exact kinetic equation ( [ boltzeq ] ) , it follows that the heating term is given by the symmetrized first velocity moment of the correlated force density @xmath58 produced by fluctuating gravitational fields . from this we see that the heating comes from gravitational energy . for this reason , it is possible for @xmath275 to be positive or negative : gravitational fluctuations can either locally heat or cool a gas . one should not try to draw conclusions about energy conservation from these results because our calculations are performed in the accelerating frame centered on a halo . however , the equations of motion used in deriving our kinetic theory imply local energy conservation . the fokker - planck equation describes the evolution of the probability distribution for particles undergoing random walks . instead of describing the system by a distribution function , we can specify equations of motion for individual particle trajectories using the langevin equation @xcite . although this is reversing the logic we used in deriving the fokker - planck equation , it is useful for providing both an understanding and a monte carlo method for numerically solving the fokker - planck equation . the langevin equation is a stochastic differential equation for the individual particle trajectories . the langevin equation corresponding to eq . ( [ fplin ] ) is given by the pair of equations @xmath276 where @xmath277 is a force due to a zero - mean gaussian random process with covariance @xmath278 the velocity of a particle at time @xmath279 , @xmath280 , is therefore given by a deterministic term @xmath281 dt$ ] , plus a random term drawn from a gaussian distribution with variance @xmath282 . subtle differences exist between the cases where the variance @xmath275 is evaluated at @xmath283 ( `` ito calculus '' ) vs. at @xmath284 ( `` stratonovich calculus '' ) . details can be found in @xcite . note that the langevin equation requires @xmath285 . the interpretation of the langevin equation is given by the following result @xcite : if a sufficiently large sample of particles is drawn at random at time @xmath286 from the phase space distribution @xmath287 , and their orbits are integrated using eqs . ( [ langevin ] ) , then at any later time @xmath66 their positions and velocities are a sample from the phase space density @xmath14 obtained by integrating eq . ( [ fplin ] ) . ( [ langevin ] ) are similar to the exact equations of motion for individual particles given by eqs . ( [ newton ] ) , but there are several important differences . the gravity field @xmath288 of one realization is replaced by the spherically symmetric gravity field of the ensemble - average density profile . the effects of spatially - varying forces in @xmath289 are represented by the drift term @xmath138 and the stochastic acceleration @xmath277 . these additional terms have the effect that , at least in the quasilinear regime ( which we assumed in our derivation of the fokker - planck equation ) , the phase space evolution implied by the langevin dynamics is equivalent to a monte carlo sample from the phase space density . this does not mean we have come full circle . for individual realizations of the ensemble , the density field is clustered and not spherically symmetric and the phase space is six - dimensional . the langevin equations give orbits in a smooth , spherically symmetric matter distribution . the latter is far easier to model numerically , with much higher resolution possible , than the original dynamics . by taking advantage of the symmetries of the average halo we have reduced the phase space from six dimensions to three . the fokker - planck equation was first written almost a century ago to describe brownian motion @xcite . in this case , a small macroscopic particle ( a brownian particle ) undergoes a random walk due to its collisions with individual molecules in a liquid . instead of the phase space density of molecules , the relevant quantity is the probability density @xmath290 for the brownian particle to have velocity @xmath16 at time @xmath66 . assuming a spatially homogeneous and isotropic medium , this probability distribution obeys the fokker - planck equation @xmath291 where @xmath292 is a constant ( given , for a small spherical body of mass @xmath23 and radius @xmath293 immersed in a fluid of viscosity @xmath294 , by the stokes formula @xmath295 ) , @xmath263 is the temperature , and @xmath296 is the boltzmann constant . ( [ fpbrown ] ) has the same form as eq . ( [ fplin ] ) if we identify @xmath297 for the drag term and @xmath298 for the diffusion term . we note that the brownian motion can be equally described by the langevin equations in eqs . ( [ langevin ] ) and ( [ stofor ] ) with @xmath299 , @xmath297 , and @xmath300 . brownian motion describes a very different physical situation than dark matter halo formation . why are both described by a fokker - planck equation ? the reason is that both problems involve random walks . let us examine this more closely . in the case of brownian motion , the random walks arise from impulsive collisions that cause the brownian particle s velocity to change significantly on a timescale @xmath301 . during this time interval the particle moves a distance @xmath302 . after an elapsed time @xmath66 , the particle undergoes @xmath303 steps and therefore moves a distance @xmath304 . in thermal equilibrium , @xmath305 so the particle moves a typical distance @xmath306 where @xmath307 is the velocity diffusivity . a random walk in space leads naturally to a diffusion equation for the probability distribution @xcite . the dark matter case at first appears to be very different . instead of a large particle being buffeted by small ones , we are studying small particles being buffeted by large mass fluctuations ( i.e. large in mass compared with the dark matter particles themselves , whose mass never enters our discussion ) . moreover , our derivation of the fokker - planck equation has assumed that the motion is in the quasilinear regime described by eq . ( [ pertdv ] ) with a universal time - dependence for @xmath308 . therefore each particle has moved in a straight line with ( in appropriate units ) a constant velocity , which is not a random walk in space . however , _ the velocity _ of a given particle is a random walk since @xmath18 is obtained by adding up the gravitational accelerations produced by all the mass fluctuations in a gaussian random field . the net force on a particle is a random walk at fixed time . although cosmic gaussian random fields lead to a fokker - planck equation , the diffusion coefficients are very different from brownian motion . first , the drift acceleration @xmath138 is independent of velocity , in contrast with the viscous drag acceleration @xmath309 for brownian motion . in the quasilinear regime of gravitational clustering , the drift is not a friction at all . instead it is radially directed ( because of spherical symmetry for the average halo ) , either inward or outward depending on the density correlations of fluctuating substructure . second , the velocity diffusivity tensor @xmath273 is not proportional to the temperature ; the dark matter is treated as being completely cold with vanishing temperature . in both cases the diffusivity is proportional to the mean squared displacement . in the cosmological case this depends simply on the power spectrum of density fluctuations and not on the thermal velocity of the particles . in the brownian case @xmath138 and @xmath139 are both proportional to the stokes drag coefficient @xmath292 . the proportionality between @xmath138 and @xmath139 is no accident but is a consequence of the fluctuation - dissipation theorem , which states that these coefficients have a proportionality given by the condition of thermal equilibrium . it is instructive to see this in a generalized case of eq . ( [ fpbrown ] ) . suppose that the brownian particle is moving in a time - independent potential @xmath310 . the fokker - planck equation then becomes @xmath311 the stationary solution ( for suitable boundary conditions ) is given by the boltzmann distribution @xmath312\ , \ \ e=\frac{1}{2}mv^2+m\phi(\vec r\,)\ .\ ] ] where @xmath25 is a normalization constant . with this solution not only does the left - hand side of eq . ( [ fpb ] ) vanish , but so does the velocity flux on the right - hand side . drag and diffusion balance each other in thermal equilibrium . note that the mean squared velocity at fixed @xmath313 equals @xmath314 . for a distribution of masses of brownian particles , thermal equilibrium results in an equipartition of energy with the heaviest particles moving most slowly . this is a natural consequence of having @xmath315 equal the thermal speed . in thermodynamic systems , the fokker - planck equation governs the relaxation to thermal equilibrium . in the cosmological case of quasilinear clustering considered here , it is not thermal equilibrium but rather the statistics of gaussian random fields that relate @xmath138 and @xmath139 . in appendix [ sec : stationary ] we investigate our cosmological fokker - planck equation for the relaxation to stationary solutions . globular cluster evolution is the most studied application of the fokker - planck equation in astrophysics . unlike the brownian case , gravity plays the dominant role here . a star in a globular cluster can be approximated as experiencing two types of gravitational forces : a smoothly varying potential @xmath316 due to the smoothed matter distribution in the system , and a fluctuating force due to many two - body interactions with other stars . the phase space density of the stars obeys the fokker - planck equation @xcite @xmath317 + \frac{1}{2 } \frac{\partial^2}{\partial v_i \partial v_j } \left [ d_{ij}(\vec v\,)f \right ] \,.\ ] ] this looks very similar to the cosmological kinetic equation ( [ fplin ] ) in the quasilinear regime , aside from a factor of two in the diffusivity that is purely a matter of differing conventions , and the velocity dependence of the diffusion coefficients . however , the physics of @xmath138 and @xmath273 is very different here . the relaxation process in globular cluster dynamics is _ two - body relaxation _ @xcite , i.e. the dissipation arising from the fluctuating forces of discrete newtonian gravitating point masses . examining this case will shed light on the relaxation processes that can affect galaxy halo evolution . the calculation of diffusion coefficients for two - body relaxation is described in 8.3 of @xcite . to understand the results it is helpful to consider the process of chandrasekhar dynamical friction acting on a test particle with mass @xmath318 and velocity @xmath319 moving through a spatially homogeneous sea of background particles of mass @xmath320 and velocity distribution @xmath321 with mass density @xmath322 . for an isotropic maxwellian distribution @xmath323 , the test body feels an acceleration @xmath324 \vec v_t\ , \ ] ] where @xmath325 . now treat each star within the globular cluster one at a time as a test particle , with all the other stars serving as background particles . if the velocity distribution is maxwellian and spatial gradients are ignored , dynamical friction will contribute @xmath326 given by eq . ( [ dynfric ] ) with @xmath319 replaced by @xmath16 . more generally , for a spatially homogeneous distribution on scales larger than the interparticle spacing , two - body relaxation gives @xcite [ ad ] @xmath327 where @xmath328 is the coulomb logarithm , and the rosenbluth potentials @xmath329 and @xmath330 are given by @xcite [ rosenbluth ] @xmath331 for the isotropic maxwellian distribution @xmath332 , @xmath333 is a drag force and the needed coefficients are [ ad2 ] @xmath334 \ , \\ d_\parallel & = & 8\pi g^2 \rho_b m_b \frac{\sigma_b^2}{v^3 } \ln \lambda \left [ { \rm erf}(x ) - \frac{2x}{\sqrt{\pi } } e^{-x^2 } \right ] \,,\\ d_\perp & = & 8\pi g^2 \rho_b m_b \frac{1}{v } \ln \lambda \left [ \left ( 1- \frac{1}{2 x^2 } \right ) { \rm erf}(x ) + \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}x } e^{-x^2 } \right ] \ , , % d_\parallel&=&\frac{2m_b}{m_t+m_b}\,\sigma_b^2\gamma\ , \\ % d_\perp&=&\frac{8\pi g^2\rho_bm_b\ln\lambda}{v}{\rm erf}(x ) % -d_\parallel\ , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath335 is defined as before ( with @xmath336 ) , and @xmath273 is decomposed into two components : @xmath337 we note that the drift @xmath138 contains two terms : the first term is proportional to the test particle mass @xmath318 while the second is independent of @xmath318 . the first term represents a `` polarization cloud '' effect , which arises from the fact that a test particle moving relative to a background deflects more upstream than downstream background particles @xcite . this process results in a density gradient and hence a drag force on the test particle , whose amplitude increases linearly with @xmath318 since the gravitational deflection is proportional to @xmath318 . in contrast , the second term in @xmath138 and the diffusivity tensor @xmath139 in eq . ( [ ad2 ] ) are both @xmath338 and independent of @xmath318 . these two terms are due to fluctuations in the gravitational potential caused by granularity in the background particle distribution . the derivation of the fokker - planck diffusion coefficients for two - body relaxation is completely different from our derivation based on quasilinear cosmological density fluctuations . in both cases , fluctuating forces lead to random walks in velocity space , hence to the fokker - planck equation . the nature of the fluctuating forces and their consequences , however , are very different in the two cases . our cosmological fokker - planck derivation is exact ( in second - order cosmological perturbation theory ) ; it yields no drag ; and the resulting drift and diffusion coefficients depend on position but are independent of velocity , as shown in eqs . ( [ adscaled])([sumfun ] ) . in contrast , the two - body relaxation calculation is based a taylor series expansion of the phenomenological ( not exact ) master equation ; it yields no radial drift ; and the drag and diffusion coefficients depend on velocity but are ( in the usual derivation ) independent of position @xcite . furthermore , the two - body relaxation rates are proportional to @xmath339 while the rates we compute are proportional to @xmath340 from eq . ( [ adscaled ] ) . in the cosmology case , the phase space correlations are built into the initial power spectrum of density fluctuations , whose amplitude is given independently of @xmath340 . with two - body relaxation , however , correlations are gravitationally induced by fluctuations instead of being present ab initio , hence the rates pick up another factor of @xmath340 . the differences in the @xmath138 term ( radial drift versus drag ) have an important consequence for equipartition of energy . as shown previously in the discussion of brownian motion , drag and diffusion work together to drive a system to thermal equilibrium in which the mean squared velocity is proportional to @xmath341 . binney and tremaine show ( p. 513 of binney & tremaine 1988 ) show that this also happens with two - body relaxation . because equilibrium systems with only gravitational forces generally have negative specific heat , there is no stable thermal equilibrium . nonetheless , two - body relaxation tends to drive the velocity distribution toward the maxwellian form , with equipartition of different mass species . in the quasilinear cosmological case , the drift and diffusion coefficients are independent of both velocity and particle mass . therefore the equilibrium velocity distribution can not depend on particle mass there is no equipartition of energy . this result is similar to violent relaxation , a process arising during the initial collapse and virialization of a dark matter halo when the gravitational potential is rapidly varying in time @xcite . our relaxation process , however , arises in the quasilinear regime and is present even if @xmath342 as it is ( at fixed comoving position ) if @xmath343 . moreover , violent relaxation ( and its partner , phase mixing ) are generally understood as arising from the collisionless dynamics represented by the left - hand side of eq . ( [ fp_globular ] ) , while both two - body relaxation and our cosmological relaxation process are represented by the `` collision '' terms on the right - hand side . why did our cosmological calculation not yield a drag term ( and a corresponding diffusion term linked to it by the fluctuation - dissipation theorem ) ? we suspect that it is because our calculation was limited to small - amplitude perturbations about a homogeneous and isotropic expanding cosmological model . the induced effects of substructure would only come in at higher order in perturbation theory . in the nonlinear regime we expect two types of drift terms to be present : @xmath344 , where @xmath3 is the radial drift and @xmath292 is the drag coefficient . the chandrasekhar calculation suggests that the drag and its accompanying diffusivity will depend on both position ( through @xmath345 ) and velocity . the radial drift is absent in the chandrasekhar calculation because the background there is assumed to be spatially homogeneous ; with an inhomogeneous distribution in a virialized halo there should be a radial drift ( and corresponding diffusivity ) that could depend on both position and velocity . in the nonlinear regime drag should arise from dynamical friction just as with the globular clusters , except that the `` background '' particles whose discreteness causes the @xmath320 terms in eqs . ( [ ad2 ] ) are now the subhalos and substructures that rain upon a halo . because we have not yet extended our derivation to the fully nonlinear regime , these expectations , while plausible , have yet to be demonstrated . in this paper we have developed a cosmological kinetic theory , valid to second - order in perturbation theory , to describe the evolution of the phase - space distribution of dark matter particles in galaxy halos . this theory introduces a new way to model the early phases of galaxy halo formation , which has traditionally been studied by analytic infall models or numerical n - body methods . the key physical ingredients behind our kinetic description are stochastic fluctuations and dissipation caused by substructures arising from a spectrum of cosmological density perturbations . the kinetic equation that we have obtained at the end of our derivation , eqs . ( [ fplin])([difflin ] ) , has the standard form of a fokker - planck equation . the diffusion coefficients @xmath346 and * d * represent acceleration due to a drift force and velocity - space diffusion , respectively . to second order in perturbation theory , these coefficients are related to various covariance matrices of the cosmological density and velocity fields given by eqs . ( [ driftlin])([difflin ] ) . these expressions can in turn be written in terms of the familiar linear power spectrum @xmath19 of matter fluctuations , as shown in eqs . ( [ coeffs ] ) and ( [ sumfun ] ) . the results for @xmath346 and * d * from second - order perturbation theory are shown in figures 14 for the currently favored @xmath20cdm model , and in figures 5 and 6 for various scale - free models with power - law @xmath4 . our results indicate that dissipative processes are important during the initial collapse of a dark matter halo , and it is not valid to model halos using the spherically symmetric vlasov ( collisionless boltzmann ) equation . furthermore , we find that the diffusivity is initially negative close to the center of a halo , indicating a thermodynamic instability . the source of this instability is gravity : perturbations enhance gravitational collapse of dark matter halos . we emphasize that our derivation leading to the fokker - planck equation given by eqs . ( [ fplin])([difflin ] ) is exact to second order in cosmological perturbation theory . we do not follow the frequently used approach ( e.g. binney & tremaine 1988 ) that begins by expanding the collisional terms of the non - exact master equation in an infinite series of changes in phase - space coordinates ( i.e. @xmath347 ) , and arrives at the fokker - planck equation by assuming weak encounters ( i.e. small @xmath348 ) and truncating the series after the second - order terms . instead , our starting point is eq . ( [ boltzeq ] ) , the first bbgky hierarchy equation for a smooth one - particle distribution function . this is an exact kinetic equation ; solving it requires specifying the one - particle distribution at an initial time and the two - particle correlation function at all times . we have shown in [ sec : dfgauss ] and appendix [ sec : pgauss ] that if the cosmological density field @xmath17 and displacement ( or velocity ) field @xmath349 are gaussian random fields , the resulting two - particle correlation function depends on the one - particle distribution in a simple way given by eq . ( [ f2cexact ] ) . ( [ f2cexact ] ) is exact to second order in perturbation theory and provides the closure relation for the bbgky hierarchy in eq . ( [ boltzeq ] ) . combining eq . ( [ f2cexact ] ) with eq . ( [ boltzeq ] ) results in eq . ( [ fplin ] ) , which is a fokker - planck equation . the cosmological dissipative processes identified in this paper are quite different from the standard two - body relaxation , which also leads to a fokker - planck equation . we find that there is no dynamical friction ( i.e. terms proportional to @xmath350 in the diffusion coefficients ) in second - order cosmological perturbation theory . instead , there is a radial drift toward ( or away from ) the center of a halo due to the clustering of matter within the halo . the usual treatment of two - body relaxation has no such drift term because it assumes the medium to be homogeneous . thus we have identified a new relaxation process that must affect the phase - space structure of dark matter halos . although our derivation is exact to second order in the density fluctuations , it is valid only when the fluctuations are small . we are therefore describing only the early stages of dark matter halo formation . the expressions we obtain for the diffusion coefficients are plainly invalid in the nonlinear regime , where we expect dynamical friction to be present as well as radial drift . in a later paper we will investigate the nonlinear generalizations of the exact second - order results derived in this paper . the fokker - planck description should still apply in the nonlinear regime provided that the fluctuating force on a particle can be modelled as a markov process consisting of a random walk of many steps . we conjecture that this description will be approximately valid when the matter distribution is modelled as a set of clumps ( i.e. , the halo model ) which scatter individual dark matter particles away from the orbits they would have in a smooth , spherical potential . the fokker - planck description should apply not only to the initial collapse and virialization of a dark matter halo containing substructure , but also to the subsequent evolution under minor mergers . our inability to solve exactly the nonlinear dynamics , however , means that the diffusion coefficients will have to be calibrated using the nonlinear halo model or numerical n - body simulations . calibrating the diffusion coefficients is not equivalent to reproducing the n - body simulations . n - body simulations provide a monte carlo solution of the bbgky hierarchy , which is much more general than the fokker - planck equation . if the simulation results are describable by fokker - planck evolution , this already represents a significant new result . moreover , even if functional forms for the radial dependence of the diffusion coefficients have to be calibrated with simulations , the solution of the fokker - planck equation contains far more information because it gives the complete phase - space density distribution , not simply radial profiles . another important step will therefore be to actually solve the fokker - planck equation . in deriving it we have identified and quantified the relaxation processes affecting halo formation and evolution , but this is only the first step . in appendix [ sec : stationary ] we presented solutions in unrealistically simple cases just to highlight the roles played by radial drift , drag , and diffusion . an outstanding question is whether these processes actually are rapid enough to erase the memory of cosmological initial conditions sufficiently so that dark matter halos relax to a universal profile . once we have a nonlinear model for the diffusion coefficients , we will address this important question . the work presented in this paper has a number of implications . first , we have highlighted the importance of the phase space density for understanding dark matter dynamics , and have developed a method for calculating its evolution during the early phases of structure formation . second , we have identified a dissipative process that may erase memories of initial conditions during the early phases of galaxy halo evolution . this erasure is necessary for universal halo density profiles , although further investigation is needed to quantify how this dissipative process affects the density profiles . third , the statistical description of the potential fluctuations caused by substructure that we have developed can also be added to investigate related problems such as the heating of galactic disks @xcite and the merging of central black holes when galaxy halos merge @xcite . we thank jon arons , avishai dekel , and martin weinberg for useful conversations . the aspen center for physics provided a stimulating environment where a portion of the research was carried out . m is partially supported by an alfred p. sloan fellowship , a cottrell scholars award from the research corporation , and nasa grant nag5 - 12173 . in this appendix we derive expressions for the probability distributions of displacement and density perturbation , @xmath133 and @xmath351 , that are needed in eqs . ( [ f1p1 ] ) and ( [ f2cp1 ] ) . we then use them to evaluate eqs . ( [ f1p1 ] ) and ( [ f2cp1 ] ) at high redshift when the matter distribution was described by a gaussian random field of small - amplitude density perturbations . we use comoving spatial coordinates @xmath352 . in accordance with the standard cosmological model , we assume that @xmath353 is a gaussian random field with power spectrum @xmath0 , and that the displacement and density are related by eq . ( [ linpsi ] ) . these are the appropriate assumptions at high redshift in standard models of structure formation . strictly speaking , at high redshift , when linear theory applies , the evolution of the distribution function is trivial because the density and velocity fields evolve by spatially - homogeneous amplification . here we use the statistics of gaussian random fields to compute quantities driving the lowest - order corrections to linear evolution . we will find that the fluctuating force is formally second order in perturbation theory . a gaussian random field is described most simply by its fourier transform , which we define by @xmath354 we suppress the time dependence for convenience . before we apply a constraint , both @xmath355 and @xmath356 have zero mean . the covariance of @xmath357 gives the power spectrum , @xmath358 where @xmath22 is the dirac delta function . in the linear regime , @xmath359 is a linear functional of @xmath355 . the multivariate distribution of any linear functional of a gaussian random field is itself gaussian ( i.e. multivariate normal ) and is therefore described completely by its mean and covariance matrix . this remains true even for a constrained gaussian random field @xcite . in our case , we wish to constrain the initial density field to represent a proto - halo . the constraints are applied to the smoothed density field @xmath360 where @xmath361 is a smoothing window with unit volume integral , @xmath362 . the subscript @xmath187 indicates the smoothing length . we assume that the smoothing window is spherically symmetric so that @xmath178 is real and depends only on the magnitude of the wavevector . throughout the paper we will use the gaussian window @xmath363 and @xmath226 . unfortunately there is no analytic theory to tell us where halos will form . however , there are a variety of plausible approaches . for example , following @xcite we might constrain @xmath364 to have a maximum of specified height , orientation , and shape at @xmath365 . this peak constraint involves ten variables ( @xmath364 and the components of its first and second derivatives with respect to each of the coordinates ) , presenting a formidable challenge to evaluating the covariance matrix of the four variables @xmath366 . the peak constraint is appealing but it is difficult to calculate and in practice it has not been found to predict well the actual formation sites of dark matter halos @xcite . instead of trying to impose complicated constraints for halo formation ( e.g. monaco et al . 2002 ) , we err on the side of simplicity by choosing to use only the zeroth and first derivatives of the smoothed initial density field @xmath367 . we require that @xmath368 be an _ extremum _ of the smoothed density field by requiring @xmath369 . of course , an extremum may be a maximum , a minimum , or a saddle point . we therefore keep track also of the smoothed density @xmath370 . provided that @xmath159 is greater than 2 standard deviations , the extrema of @xmath371 are close to the peaks @xcite . how will we know if our results depend strongly on the choice of constraint ? we will do this in two ways . first , we will vary the height of the extremum , @xmath159 . second , we will drop the gradient constraint and use the single constraint @xmath159 . while these tests will not prove that we have a good model for the sites of halo formation , they do provide control cases for us to assess the sensitivity of our results to the details of the initial constraints . now we must calculate the mean and covariances of @xmath366 subject to constraints @xmath372 where @xmath373 the method for this calculation is based on the theorem presented in appendix d of @xcite , which states that if @xmath374 and @xmath375 are zero - mean gaussian variables ( more generally , vectors of any length ) , then the conditional distribution for @xmath375 given @xmath374 , @xmath376 , is gaussian with mean @xmath377 and covariance matrix @xmath378 where @xmath379 . the symbol @xmath380 denotes a tensor product and angle brackets denote mean values . thus , @xmath381 is the covariance matrix of the constraints while @xmath382 is the covariance matrix of @xmath375 subject to the constraints . ( the symbol @xmath128 , used either as a function or as a subscript , implies that a constraint is applied . ) the juxtaposition of two matrices implies matrix multiplication . to apply these results , first we compute the covariance matrix of constraints @xmath383 . using eqs . ( [ fourier])([window ] ) , we get the covariances [ varcon ] @xmath384 where @xmath385 is the unit tensor . next we consider the covariance matrix of the variables @xmath386 . since @xmath387 , the displacement field @xmath18 has an additional factor @xmath388 in the integrand of eq . ( [ fourier ] ) . for the off - diagonal elements of the covariance matrix of @xmath375 we obtain [ covyb ] @xmath389 where the spherical bessel functions are @xmath390 and @xmath391 . the diagonal variances are [ covybb ] @xmath392 note that in eqs . ( [ covyb ] ) ( and in the following ) we are using @xmath313 as a comoving displacement vector and not as the radius vector in proper coordinates . proper coordinates are not used in this appendix . finally , we have the cross - covariances between our primary variables and the constraints , i.e. the components of @xmath393 . these follow from eqs . ( [ fourier])([smoothdel ] ) : [ covyab ] @xmath394 to arrive at the last expression above , we have used the identity @xmath395\hat r\otimes\hat r+\frac{j_1(kr)}{kr}\,{\bf i}\ , \ ] ] where @xmath396 , @xmath397 and @xmath385 is the unit tensor . using eqs . ( [ meany ] ) and ( [ varcon])([covyab ] ) , we get the mean values subject to the extremum constraints @xmath398 , [ meanext ] @xmath399 the subscript @xmath128 denotes `` subject to constraints . '' ( [ meanext ] ) would be unchanged had we dropped the extremum condition and imposed instead the single constraint @xmath400 ; the constraint @xmath401 has no effect on the mean values . this follows because @xmath402 so that the only way that @xmath177 can enter the mean values is through terms proportional to @xmath403 which vanish when the extremum constraint is imposed . we now compute the covariance matrix of our variables @xmath386 subject to the extremum constraints @xmath383 . the covariances follow from eqs . ( [ covy])([covyab ] ) . recalling the definition @xmath404 , we obtain [ covfun ] @xmath405\ , \label{c2i}\\ c(\delta_1,\vec\psi_1 ) & = & \frac{\bar\xi_1\bar\eta_1\vec x_1}{\sigma_0 ^ 2 } + \frac{1}{\sigma_1 ^ 2}\frac{d\bar\xi}{dr_1}(\bar\xi_1 - 2\bar\eta_1 ) \hat x_1\ , \label{c1i}\\ c(\vec\psi_1,\vec\psi_1 ) & = & c_r\hat r_1\otimes\hat r_1 + c_t ( { \bf i}- \hat r_1\otimes\hat r_1 ) \ , \nonumber\\ c_r(r_1 ) & \equiv & \sigma_\psi^2-\left(\frac{r_1\bar\eta_1 } { \sigma_0}\right)^2 - \left(\frac{\bar\xi_1 - 2\bar\eta_1}{\sigma_1 } \right)^2\ , \label{cpar}\\ c_t(r_1)&\equiv&\sigma_\psi^2-\left(\frac{\bar\eta_1}{\sigma_1 } \right)^2\ , \label{cper}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath406 and @xmath407 , and we have used the relation @xmath408 . note that @xmath409 is a vector and @xmath410 is a second - rank tensor . later we will need the tensor @xmath411 , which is the matrix inverse of @xmath410 . the role of constraints is easy to see in eqs . ( [ covfun ] ) . the constraint on @xmath159 is responsible for the terms proportional to @xmath196 while the constraint on @xmath177 gives rise to the terms proportional to @xmath197 . therefore , the constraints are easily removed by setting @xmath412 ( to eliminate the constraint on @xmath177 ) or @xmath196 ( to eliminate the constraint on @xmath159 ) . as expected , in the absence of any constraints , the covariance matrix recovers the same expressions as the unconstrained covariance in eqs . ( [ covyb ] ) and ( [ covybb ] ) . we will need one more covariance , @xmath413 subject to the extremum constraints where @xmath414 . using eqs . ( [ covy ] ) , ( [ covyab ] ) , and ( [ nntens ] ) , we get @xmath415 now we are ready to calculate the probability distribution functions and means of various quantities needed in [ sec : dfgauss ] . specifically , we need @xmath133 , @xmath416 , @xmath417 , @xmath418 , and @xmath419 that appear in the key eqs . ( [ f1p1 ] ) and ( [ f2cp1 ] ) for @xmath420 and @xmath421 . ( [ m2c ] ) already gives @xmath422 but we need to calculate the other quantities . first , the probability density distribution for the displacement @xmath133 ( subject to the extremum constraints ) is a three - dimensional gaussian whose mean and covariance are given above , implying @xmath423\ .\ ] ] note that the argument of the exponential is a scalar the dot denotes a contraction ( dot product ) . the joint distribution of displacement and density ( subject to the constraints ) is a little more complicated to work out since this requires inverting the @xmath424 covariance matrix of @xmath366 . the distribution factors into conditional and marginal distributions , @xmath425 . straightforward algebra gives the conditional distribution , @xmath426 ^ 2\right\}\ , \ ] ] where @xmath427 note that the second term in @xmath428 ( and the similar term in eq . [ f2cond ] ) is a scalar . writing it out with indices and using the summation convention , @xmath429 . ( [ f2cond ] ) and ( [ vardel2 ] ) could also have been derived by noting that @xmath430 for @xmath431 and @xmath432 . then using eq . ( [ meany ] ) and relations @xmath433 and @xmath434 , we obtain @xmath435 which is identical to the mean in eq . ( [ f2cond ] ) . the constrained mean @xmath436 follows simply by replacing @xmath422 with @xmath437 and @xmath438 with @xmath439 . the only remaining constrained mean that we need to evaluate is @xmath419 . direct evaluation of the conditional distribution would require inverting a @xmath440 matrix . it is much simpler to use eqs . ( [ meany ] ) and ( [ covy ] ) with @xmath441 and @xmath442 . from the off - diagonal element of @xmath443 , we get @xmath444 at last we are ready to evaluate the one- and two - particle distribution functions for small - amplitude gaussian fluctuations . substituting @xmath445 into eq . [ f1p1 ] ) , to second order in @xmath17 we obtain @xmath446 where @xmath166 is given by eq . ( [ m1c ] ) with @xmath447 and @xmath150 is a vector equal to the covariance of the constrained @xmath17 and @xmath18 given in eq . ( [ c1i ] ) . without an initial constraint we would have @xmath448 and @xmath449 . an initial constraint on the proto - halo shifts the mean density and causes the density and velocity to be correlated hence it changes the phase space density . note that eq . ( [ f1lin ] ) implies that in linear theory the spatial and velocity distributions decouple . as expected , the mean spatial density is @xmath450 . the velocity distribution at each point in the halo is simply the underlying gaussian of eq . ( [ fpsi1 ] ) with the mean shifted by @xmath150 . note that the value of the proto - halo smoothed density constraint @xmath159 affects the density profile , @xmath451 , but it does not affect the velocity distribution up to second order in perturbation theory . the imposition of the extremum constraint @xmath401 affects the phase space density only through the term in @xmath452 . setting @xmath412 everywhere removes the constraint on @xmath177 . the two - particle correlation is found by substituting eqs . ( [ d2psi1 ] ) and ( [ d1d2psi1 ] ) into eq . ( [ f2cp1 ] ) . the result is @xmath453 \cdot\frac{\partial}{\partial\vpsia } \log p(\vpsia ) \right\ } p(\vpsia)(hb)^{-3}\ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] this equation is the main result of this appendix . it is exact for gaussian random fields . stationary solutions of the fokker - planck equation are relevant for systems that relax on a timescale faster than external changes take place . the stationary solution for classical brownian motion was given in [ sec : brownian ] . stationary solutions may also exist for cosmological systems where the constant - temperature heat bath is replaced by small - scale structure that rains upon dark matter halos . stationary solutions have @xmath454 and @xmath455 so that the flux vanishes in velocity space . we consider spherically symmetric solutions as appropriate for the average halo . from jeans theorem , the distribution function is a function of the integrals of motion @xcite . for spherical systems it is often assumed that stationary solutions have the form @xmath456 where @xmath457 ( the particle masses are irrelevant , so we use the specific energy and angular momentum . ) the collisionless boltzmann equation gives no constraint on @xmath458 . the fokker - planck equation , however , constrains @xmath40 because stationarity requires that @xmath459 . assuming spherical symmetry , we write @xmath460 introducing the radial drift coefficient @xmath3 and drag coefficient @xmath292 . we assume isotropic diffusivity @xmath275 . for the globular cluster case with chandrasekhar s dynamical friction , @xmath461 . for the case of quasilinear cosmological fluctuations arising from gaussian random fields , we have seen that @xmath462 . ( the cosmological case also allows for different diffusivities in the radial and tangential directions , but that is an unnecessary complication here . ) requiring the phase space flux to vanish now gives the following constraints on the distribution function @xmath458 : @xmath463 it is interesting to see what conditions lead to thermal equilibrium with a maxwellian distribution of velocities , i.e. eq . ( [ equilsol ] ) with @xmath464 . ( [ station0 ] ) shows that the conditions are @xmath461 and @xmath465 . thus , the drift must be velocity dependent and behave like a drag , @xmath466 . friction converts shear into heat in such a way as to drive the system towards thermal equilibrium . chandrasekhar dynamical friction satisfies these conditions ; therefore , two - body relaxation drives the velocity distribution towards the maxwell - boltzmann form . quasilinear cosmological fluctuations , however , are quite different , having @xmath462 and @xmath467 , implying @xmath468 . while these equations do not have simple general solutions , it is clear that cosmological fluctuations do not drive a system towards thermal equilibrium with equipartition of energies . our cosmological relaxation process is similar to violent relaxation in this respect @xcite . although the general cosmological case of relaxation in a dark matter halo with @xmath467 is complicated and can not be fully solved here , there is a special case worthy of closer examination , namely , the evolution of an unconstrained cosmological gaussian random field , where fluctuations generate peculiar velocities . that is , we drop the constraint of having a halo centered at @xmath469 and instead consider the velocity distribution of dark matter particles at a randomly selected point in space . to consider the cosmological case , we should use the appropriate comoving variables to factor out the hubble expansion . in place of @xmath313 and @xmath16 , we use the following variables : @xmath470 where @xmath91 is the cosmic scale factor and @xmath471 . with this change of variables , the fokker - planck equation ( [ fplin ] ) becomes @xmath472 if the velocities are measured in the comoving frame , @xmath473 is replaced by @xmath35 . when using comoving coordinates the gravitational field is reduced by the hubble acceleration , @xmath474 . if the mean density field is homogeneous , then all particles move with the unperturbed hubble expansion , @xmath475 , implying @xmath476 . thus , both the velocity and acceleration terms on the left - hand side vanish when @xmath477 . if we apply no initial constraint on the density field , then the one - point distribution function @xmath40 is a function only of time and peculiar velocity @xmath478 . we use the variable @xmath253 for the velocity because @xmath478 decreases in proportion to @xmath479 for a freely - falling body in an unperturbed homogeneous and isotropic expanding universe . if not for the right - hand side , the solution of eq . ( [ fpcomov ] ) for a homogeneous and isotropic model would be @xmath480 , i.e. the the initial peculiar velocity distribution would simply redshift with cosmic expansion and remain spatially homogeneous . the fokker - planck equation does not , however , describe an unperturbed homogeneous and isotropic universe . rather it describes the statistical average of an ensemble of universes with fluctuations . in the case of unconstrained initial conditions , @xmath481 and eq . ( [ fpcomov ] ) reduces to @xmath482\ , \ ] ] where @xmath483 and @xmath484 in general . we have used statistical isotropy to require @xmath485 where @xmath486 is a unit vector in the direction of @xmath253 . in second order perturbation theory ( [ sec : fpdiffco ] ) , @xmath487 ( no drag ) and @xmath488 ( assuming that we measure velocities in the comoving frame . ) the fokker - planck equation then takes the form of a diffusion equation with @xmath275 independent of @xmath489 , and the general solution is @xmath490 the effect of fluctuations is simply to spread the initial velocity distribution ( if @xmath285 ) while retaining the gaussian form . physically , the gravitational fluctuations of substructure cause local heating . contrary to eq . ( [ diffsol ] ) , cosmological simulations show that the distribution of peculiar velocities in the nonlinear regime is closer to exponential rather than gaussian , at least in the tails @xcite . it is interesting to ask whether the fokker - planck equation can explain such a result . with the drift term retained , eq . ( [ fpcomhom ] ) has the stationary solution @xmath491 if @xmath492 is positive and independent of @xmath489 , the result is indeed an exponential distribution of peculiar velocities @xmath489 . in second - order perturbation theory we found that @xmath487 and @xmath275 is independent of @xmath489 , however chandrasekhar s dynamical friction gives @xmath493 . evidently , a third case is needed to explain the exponential velocity distribution there must be a drag such that @xmath492 is independent of @xmath489 , quite unlike dynamical friction from two - body relaxation . determining whether such a drag term arises from nonlinear gravitational clustering is a subject for further work . as one final example , we consider the effects of both drag and radial drift in a simplified model illustrating the effects of collisions on a system for which the relaxation time is much longer than the dynamical time ( e.g. the crossing - time for a particle in a halo ) . under these conditions , the system at all times is nearly in collisionless equilibrium with the phase space density being a function of the actions alone ( and not the angles , using action - angle variables ) . because the actions are conserved in the absence of collisions , for quasi - static evolution eq . ( [ fplin ] ) simplifies to @xmath494\ , \ ] ] where we have generalized the radial drift to an arbitrary vector field @xmath495 which we assume to be independent of @xmath16 . we can solve this equation exactly for the simple case where @xmath495 , @xmath292 , and @xmath139 are all constants . the general solution is the green s function solution @xmath496 with green s function @xmath497-\frac{1}{2\gamma}\vec s\cdot{\bf d}\cdot\vec s \left(1-e^{-2\gamma t}\right)\right\}\ .\ ] ] the parameter @xmath301 is a relaxation time . ( [ fpqsgreen ] ) simplifies to a normalized gaussian in two limits , @xmath498 where @xmath499 is a multivariate normal with mean @xmath253 and covariance matrix @xmath500 . the solution for @xmath501 was given previously in eq . ( [ diffsol ] ) . now we have a more general solution showing that the equilibrium ( for constant diffusion coefficients ) is a maxwellian with velocity dispersion tensor @xmath502 just in eq . ( [ fpstat ] ) if @xmath503 , but now the drift vector @xmath495 produces an offset of the mean velocity @xmath504 . thus , velocity - independent drift @xmath3 and velocity - dependent drag @xmath309 play completely different roles in collisional relaxation . in later papers we will investigate these roles for more realistic models of nonlinear halo evolution . plotted as a function of halo radius @xmath173 for gaussian smoothing lengths @xmath505 0.5 , 0.25 , 0.1 , and 0.05 @xmath506 mpc . it is computed from eq . ( [ scala ] ) for the @xmath20cdm model with @xmath507 . for comparison , the dashed curve shows @xmath186 for an unconstrained field . the vertical axis shows the dimensionless @xmath508 , i.e. the drift normalized by the rms of the peculiar gravitational acceleration . ] in the radial ( @xmath173 ) and tangential ( @xmath66 ) directions plotted as a function of halo radius @xmath173 for gaussian smoothing lengths @xmath509 , 0.5 , and 0.05 @xmath506 mpc . it is computed from eqs . ( [ scaldr ] ) and ( [ scaldt ] ) for the same cosmological model as fig . 1 . the dashed curve in each panel is for an unconstrained field . the vertical axis shows the dimensionless @xmath510 , i.e. the diffusivity normalized by the mean squared peculiar gravitational acceleration . ] for power - law spectra , @xmath4 , plotted as a function of halo radius @xmath173 scaled to the gaussian smoothing radius @xmath187 . results are shown for four spectral indices , @xmath511 , and 1 , and for constrained and unconstrained fields . the amplitude of @xmath186 corresponds to @xmath512 normalized to @xmath513 . ] in the radial ( @xmath173 ) and tangential ( @xmath66 ) directions for power - law spectra , @xmath4 , plotted as a function of halo radius @xmath173 scaled to the gaussian smoothing radius @xmath187 . results are shown for two spectral indices , @xmath250 and @xmath514 , and for constrained and unconstrained fields . for @xmath515 , constraints cause the diffusivity to approach a negative constant for @xmath516 . the amplitude of @xmath275 corresponds to @xmath512 normalized to @xmath513 . ] antonuccio - delogu , v. & colafrancesco , s. 1994 , , 427 , 72 bardeen , j. m. , bond , j. r. , kaiser , n. , & szalay , a. s. 1986 , , 304 , 15 benson , a. j. , lacey , c. g. , frenk , c. s. , baugh , c. m. , & cole , s. f 2003 , astro - ph/0307298 bertschinger , e. 1985 , , 58 , 39 bertschinger , e. 1993 , in statistical description of transport in plasma , astro- , and nuclear physics , ed . j. misguich , g. pelletier , & p. schuck , ( commack , ny : nova science ) , 193 bertschinger , e. 1996 , in cosmology and large scale structure , proc . les houches summer school , session lx , ed . r. schaeffer , j. silk , m. spiro , and j. zinn - justin ( amsterdam : elsevier science ) , 273 binney , j. j. & tremaine , s. 1988 , galactic dynamics ( princeton : princeton university press ) bullock , j. s. , dekel , a. , kolatt , t. s. , kravtsov , a. v. klypin , a. a. porciani , c. , & primack , j. r. 2001 , , 555 , 240 chandrasekhar , s. 1943 , , 97 , 255 davis , m. & peebles , p. j. e. , 34 , 425 dekel , a. , devor , j. , & hetzroni , g. 2003 , , 341 , 326 dupree , t. h. 1967 , phys . fluids 10 , 1049 evans , n. w. & collett , j. l. 1997 , , 480 , l103 fillmore , j. a. & goldreich , p. 1984 , , 281 , 1 fokker , a. d. 1914 , ann . physik 43 , 810 gardiner , c. w. 2002 , handbook of stochastic methods ( berlin : springer ) ghigna , s. , moore , b. , governato , f. , lake , g. , quinn , t. , stadel , j. 1998 , mnras , 300 , 146 gilbert , i. h. 1968 , , 152 , 1043 gunn , j. e. & gott , j. r. 1972 , , 176 , 1 haehnelt , m. , & kauffmann , g. 2002 , , 336 , l61 hoffman , y. , & shaham , j. 1985 , , 297 , 16 hughes , s. a. , & blandford , r. d. 2003 , 585 , l101 ichimaru , s. 1973 , basic principles of plasma physics : a statistical approach ( reading : addison - wesley ) jain , b. , & bertschinger , e. 1994 , , 431 , 495 kauffmann , g. , & haehnelt , m. 2000 , , 311 , 576 katz , n. , quinn , t. , & gelb , j. 1993 , , 265 , 689 klimontovich , yu . l. 1967 , the statistical theory of non - equilibrium processes in a plasma ( cambridge , mass . : mit press ) klypin a. , kravtsov a. v. , valenzuela 0 . , prada f. 1999 , apj , 522 , 82 langevin , p. 1908 , comptes rendus , 146 , 530 lynden - bell , d. 1967 , , 136 , 101 monaco , p. , theuns , t. , taffoni , g. , governato , f. , quinn , t. , & stadel , j. 2002 , , 564 , 8 moore , b. , governato , f. , quinn , t. , stadel , j. , & lake , g. 1998 , , 499 , l5 moore , b. , ghigna , s. , governato , f. , lake , g. , quinn , t. , stadel , j. , tozzi , p. 1999 , apj , 524 , 19l mulder , w. a. 1983 , a&a , 117 , 9 navarro , j. f. , frenk , c. s. , & white , s. d. m. 1996 , , 462 , 563 navarro , j. f. , frenk , c. s. , & white , s. d. m. 1997 , , 490 , 493 nusser , a. & sheth , r. k. 1999 , , 303 , 685 peebles , p. j. e. 1980 , the large scale structure of the universe ( princeton : princeton university press ) planck , m. 1917 , sitzber . p. 324 risken , h. 1989 , the fokker - planck equation ( berlin : springer ) rosenbluth , m. n. , macdonald , w. m. , & judd , d. l. 1957 , phys . 107 , 1 sheth , r. k. , & diaferio , a. 2001 , , 322 , 901 spitzer , l. 1987 , dynamical evolution of globular clusters ( princeton : princeton university press ) syer , d. , & white , s. d. m. 1998 , , 293 , 337 weinberg , m. d. 2001 , , 328 , 311 ; 328 , 321 white , s. d. m. 1984 , , 286 , 38 zeldovich , ya . b. 1970 , a & a , 5 , 84 Abstract:
[ "we present a kinetic theory for the evolution of the phase - space distribution of dark matter particles in galaxy halos in the presence of a cosmological spectrum of fluctuations . this theory introduces a new way to model the formation and evolution of halos , which traditionally have been investigated by analytic gravitational infall models or numerical n - body methods . unlike the collisionless boltzmann equation , our kinetic equation contains nonzero terms on the right - hand side arising from stochastic fluctuations in the gravitational potential due to substructures in the dark matter mass distribution . using statistics for constrained gaussian random fields in standard cosmological models , we show that our kinetic equation to second - order in perturbation theory is of the fokker - planck form , with one scattering term representing drift and the other representing diffusion in velocity - space . the drift is radial , and the drift and diffusion coefficients depend only on positions and not velocities ; our relaxation process in the quasilinear regime is therefore different from the standard two - body relaxation . we provide explicit expressions relating these coefficients to the linear power spectrum of mass fluctuations and present results for the currently favored cold dark matter model with a nonzero cosmological constant . solutions to this kinetic equation will provide a complete description of the cold dark matter spatial and velocity distributions for the average halo during the early phases of galaxy halo formation ." ]
19,503
19,503
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the basics of the density matrix renormalization group were developed by s. white in 1992@xcite and since then dmrg has proved to be a very powerful method for low dimensional interacting systems . its remarkable accuracy can be seen for example in the spin-1 heisenberg chain : for a system of hundreds of sites a precision of @xmath0 for the ground state energy can be achieved . since then it has been applied to a great variety of systems and problems including , among others , spin chains and ladders , fermionic and bosonic systems , disordered models , impurities and molecules and 2d electrons in high magnetic fields . it has also been improved substantially in several directions like two ( and three ) dimensional ( 2d ) classical systems , stochastic models , the presence of phonons , quantum chemistry , field theory , the inclusion of temperature and the calculation of dynamical and time - dependent properties . some calculations have also been performed in 2d quantum systems . all these topics are treated in detail and in a pedagogical way in the book @xcite , where the reader can find an extensive review on dmrg . in this article we will attempt to cover the different areas where it has been applied without entering into details but in a few cases , where we have chosen some representative contributions . we suggest the interested reader to look for further information in the referenced work . our aim here is to give the reader a general overview on the subject . one of the most important limitations of numerical calculations in finite systems is the great amount of states that have to be considered and its exponential growth with system size . several methods have been introduced in order to reduce the size of the hilbert space to be able to reach larger systems , such as monte carlo , renormalization group ( rg ) and dmrg . each method considers a particular criterion of keeping the relevant information . the dmrg was originally developed to overcome the problems that arise in interacting systems in 1d when standard rg procedures were applied . consider a block b ( a block is a collection of sites ) where the hamiltonian @xmath1 and end - operators are defined . these traditional methods consist in putting together two or more blocks ( e.g. b - b , which we will call the superblock ) , connected using end - operators , in a basis that is a direct product of the basis of each block , forming @xmath2 . this hamiltonian is then diagonalized , the superblock is replaced by a new effective block @xmath3 formed by a certain number @xmath4 of lowest - lying eigenstates of @xmath2 and the iteration is continued ( see ref . although it has been used successfully in certain cases , this procedure , or similar versions of it , has been applied to several interacting systems with poor performance . for example , it has been applied to the 1d hubbard model keeping @xmath5 states . for 16 sites , an error of 5 - 10% was obtained @xcite . other results@xcite were also discouraging . a better performance was obtained @xcite by adding a single site at a time rather than doubling the block size . however , there is one case where a similar version of this method applies very well : the kondo ( and anderson ) model . wilson@xcite mapped the one - impurity problem onto a one - dimensional lattice with exponentially descreasing hoppings . the difference with the method explained above is that in this case , one site ( equivalent to an onion shell " ) is added at each step and , due to the exponential decrease of the hopping , very accurate results can be obtained . returning to the problem of putting several blocks together , the main source of error comes from the election of eigenstates of @xmath2 as representative states of a superblock . since @xmath2 has no connection to the rest of the lattice , its eigenstates may have unwanted features ( like nodes ) at the ends of the block and this ca nt be improved by increasing the number of states kept . based on this consideration , noack and white@xcite tried including different boundary conditions and boundary strengths . this turned out to work well for single particle and anderson localization problems but , however , it did not improve the results significantly for interacting systems . these considerations led to the idea of taking a larger superblock that includes the blocks @xmath6 , diagonalize the hamiltonian in this large superblock and then somehow project the most favorable states onto @xmath6 . then @xmath6 is replaced by @xmath3 . in this way , awkward features in the boundary would vanish and a better representation of the states in the infinite system would be achieved . white@xcite proposed the density matrix as the optimal way of projecting the best states onto part of the system and this will be discussed in the next section . some considerations concerning the effect of boundary conditions in the nature of the states kept ( and an analogy to the physics of black holes ) is given in @xcite . the justification of using the density matrix is given in detail in ref.@xcite . a very easy and pedagogical way of understanding the basic functioning of dmrg is applying it to the calculation of simple quantum problems like one particle in a tight binding chain @xcite . in the following section we will briefly describe the standard method ; in sect . 3 we will mention some of the most important applications ; in sect . 4 we review the most relevant extensions to the method and finally in sect . 5 we concentrate on the way dynamical calculations can be performed within dmrg . the dmrg allows for a systematic truncation of the hilbert space by keeping the most probable states describing a wave function ( _ e.g . _ the ground state ) instead of the lowest energy states usually kept in previous real space renormalization techniques . the basic idea consists in starting from a small system ( _ e.g _ with @xmath7 sites ) and then gradually increase its size ( to @xmath8 , @xmath9 , ... ) until the desired length is reached . let us call the collection of @xmath7 sites the _ universe _ and divide it into two parts : the _ system _ and the _ environment _ ( see fig . [ figsuperblock ] ) . the hamiltonian is constructed in the _ universe _ and its ground state @xmath10 is obtained . this is considered as the state of the _ universe _ and called the _ target state_. it has components on the _ system _ and the _ environment_. we want to obtain the most relevant states of the _ system _ , i.e. , the states of the _ system _ that have largest weight in @xmath11 . to obtain this , the _ environment _ is considered as a statistical bath and the density matrix@xcite is used to obtain the desired information on the _ system_. so instead of keeping eigenstates of the hamiltonian in the block ( _ system _ ) , we keep eigenstates of the density matrix . we will be more explicit below . = 2.0 in = 1.0 in [ figsuperblock ] let s define block [ * b * ] as a finite chain with @xmath12 sites , having an associated hilbert space with , @xmath4 states where operators are defined ( in particular the hamiltonian in this finite chain , @xmath1 and the operators at the ends of the block , useful for linking it to other chains or added sites ) . except for the first iteration , the basis in this block is nt explicitly known due to previous basis rotations and reductions . the operators in this basis are matrices and the basis states are characterized by quantum numbers ( like @xmath13 , charge or number of particles , etc ) . we also define an added block or site as [ * a * ] having @xmath14 states . a general iteration of the method is described below : \i ) define the hamiltonian @xmath2 for the superblock ( the _ universe _ ) formed by putting together two blocks [ * b * ] and [ * b * ] and two added sites [ * a * ] and [ * a * ] in this way : [ * b a a b * ] ( the primes are only to indicate additional blocks , but the primed blocks have the same structure as the non - primed ones ; this can vary , see the finite - size algorithm below ) . in general , blocks [ * b * ] and [ * b * ] come from the previous iteration . the total hilbert space of this superblock is the direct product of the individual spaces corresponding to each block and the added sites . in practice a quantum number of the superblock can be fixed ( in a spin chain for example one can look at the total @xmath15 subspace ) , so the total number of states in the superblock is much smaller than @xmath16 . in some cases , as the quantum number of the superblock consists of the sum of the quantum numbers of the individual blocks , each block must contain several subspaces ( several values of @xmath13 for example ) . here periodic boundary conditions can be attached to the ends and a different block layout should be considered ( e.g. [ * b a b a * ] ) to avoid connecting blocks [ * b * ] and [ * b * ] which takes longer to converge . the boundary conditions are between [ * a * ] and [ * b * ] . for closed chains the performance is poorer than for open boundary conditions @xcite . \ii ) diagonalize the hamiltonian @xmath2 to obtain the ground state @xmath11 ( target state ) using lanczos@xcite or davidson@xcite algorithms . other states could also be kept , such as the first excited ones : they are all called _ target states_. \iii ) construct the density matrix : @xmath17 on block [ * b a * ] , where @xmath18 , the states @xmath19 belonging to the hilbert space of the block [ * b a * ] and the states @xmath20 to the block [ * b a * ] . the density matrix considers the part [ * b a * ] as a system and [ * b a * ] , as a statistical bath . the eigenstates of @xmath21 with the highest eigenvalues correspond to the most probable states ( or equivalently the states with highest weight ) of block [ * b a * ] in the ground state of the whole superblock . these states are kept up to a certain cutoff , keeping a total of @xmath4 states per block . the density matrix eigenvalues sum up to unity and the truncation error , defined as the sum of the density matrix eigenvalues corresponding to discarded eigenvectors , gives a qualitative indication of the accuracy of the calculation . \iv ) with these @xmath4 states a rectangular matrix @xmath22 is formed and it is used to change basis and reduce all operators defined in [ * b a * ] . this block [ * b a * ] is then renamed as block [ * b@xmath23 * ] or simply [ * b * ] ( for example , the hamiltonian in block [ * b a * ] , @xmath24 , is transformed into @xmath25 as @xmath26 ) . \v ) a new block [ * a * ] is added ( one site in our case ) and the new superblock [ * b a a b * ] is formed as the direct product of the states of all the blocks . \vi ) this iteration continues until the desired length is achieved . at each step the length is @xmath27 ( if [ * a * ] consists of one site ) . when more than one target state is used , _ i.e _ more than one state is wished to be well described , the density matrix is defined as : @xmath28 where @xmath29 defines the probability of finding the system in the target state @xmath30 ( not necessarily eigenstates of the hamiltonian ) . the method described above is usually called the _ infinite - system algorithm _ since the system size increases at each iteration . there is a way to increase precision at each length @xmath7 called the _ finite - system algorithm_. it consists of fixing the lattice size and zipping a couple of times until convergence is reached . in this case and for the block configuration [ * b a a b * ] , @xmath31 where @xmath12 and @xmath32 are the number of sites in @xmath33 and @xmath34 respectively . in this step the density matrix is used to project onto the left @xmath35 sites . in order to keep @xmath7 fixed , in the next block configuration , the right block @xmath34 should be defined in @xmath36 sites such that @xmath37 . the operators in this smaller block should be kept from previous iterations ( in some cases from the iterations for the system size with @xmath38)@xcite . the calculation of static properties like correlation functions is easily done by keeping the operators in question at each step and performing the corresponding basis change and reduction , in a similar manner as done with the hamiltonian in each block@xcite . the energy and measurements are calculated in the superblock . in ref.@xcite an interpretation of the correlation functions of systems at criticality is given in terms of wave function entanglement , conjecturing a modification of dmrg for these cases that preserves the entanglement . a faster convergence of lanczos or davidson algorithm is achieved by choosing a good trial vector@xcite . an interesting analysis on dmrg accuracy is done in ref . fixed points of the dmrg and their relation to matrix product wave functions were studied in @xcite and an analytic formulation combining the block renormalization group with variational and fokker - planck methods in @xcite . the connection of the method with quantum groups and conformal field theory is treated in @xcite . there are also interesting connections between the density matrix spectra and integrable models@xcite via corner transfer matrices . these articles give a deep insight into the essence of the dmrg method . since its development , the number of papers using dmrg has grown enormously and other improvements to the method have been performed . we would like to mention some applications where this method has proved to be useful . other applications related to further developments of the dmrg will be mentioned in sect . a very impressive result with unprecedented accuracy was obtained by white and huse @xcite when calculating the spin gap in a @xmath39 heisenberg chain obtaining @xmath40 . they also calculated very accurate spin correlation functions and excitation energies for one and several magnon states and performed a very detailed analysis of the excitations for different momenta . they obtained a spin correlation length of 6.03 lattice spacings . simultaneously srensen and affleck@xcite also calculated the structure factor and spin gap for this system up to length 100 with very high accuracy , comparing their results with the nonlinear @xmath41 model . in a subsequent paper@xcite they applied the dmrg to the anisotropic @xmath39 chain , obtaining the values for the haldane gap . they also performed a detailed study of the @xmath42 end excitations in an open chain . thermodynamical properties in open @xmath39 chains such as specific heat , electron paramagnetic resonance ( epr ) and magnetic susceptibility calculated using dmrg gave an excellent fit to experimental data , confirming the existence of free spins 1/2 at the boundaries@xcite . a related problem , _ i.e. _ the effect of non - magnetic impurities in spin systems ( dimerized , ladders and 2d ) was studied in @xcite . in addition , the study of magnon interactions and magnetization of @xmath39 chains was done in @xcite , supersymmetric spin chains modelling plateau transitions in the integer quantum hall effect in @xcite and esr studies in these systems was considered in @xcite . for larger integer spins there have also been some studies . nishiyama and coworkers@xcite calculated the low energy spectrum and correlation functions of the @xmath43 antiferromagnetic heisenberg open chain . they found @xmath39 end excitations ( in agreement with the valence bond theory ) . edge excitations for other values of @xmath44 have been studied in ref . @xcite . almost at the same time schollwck and jolicoeur@xcite calculated the spin gap in the same system , up to 350 sites , ( @xmath45 ) , correlation functions that showed topological order and a spin correlation length of 49 lattice spacings . more recent accurate studies of @xmath43 chains are found in @xcite and of @xmath39 chains in staggered magnetic fields @xcite including a detalied comparison to the non - linear sigma model in @xcite . in ref . @xcite the dispersion of the single magnon band and other properties of the @xmath43 antiferromagnetic heisenberg chains were calculated . concerning @xmath42 systems , dmrg has been crucial for obtaining the logarithmic corrections to the @xmath46 dependence of the spin - spin correlation functions in the isotropic heisenberg model @xcite . for this , very accurate values for the energy and correlation functions were needed . for @xmath47 sites an error of @xmath48 was achieved keeping @xmath49 states per block , comparing with the exact finite - size bethe ansatz results . for this model it was found that the data for the correlation function has a very accurate scaling behaviour and advantage of this was taken to obtain the logarithmic corrections in the thermodynamic limit . other calculations of the spin correlations have been performed for the isotropic @xcite and anisotropic cases @xcite . luttinger liquid behaviour with magnetic fields have been studied in @xcite , field - induced gaps in @xcite , anisotropic systems in @xcite and the heisenberg model with a weak link in @xcite . an analysis of quantum critical points and critical behaviour in spin chains by combining dmrg with finite - size scaling was done in @xcite . similar calculations have been performed for the @xmath50 heisenberg chain @xcite . in this case a stronger logarithmic correction to the spin correlation function was found . for this model there was interest in obtaining the central charge @xmath51 to elucidate whether this model corresponds to the same universality class as the @xmath42 case , where the central charge can be obtained from the finite - size scaling of the energy . although there have been previous attempts@xcite , these calculations presented difficulties since they involved also a term @xmath52 . with the dmrg the value @xmath53 was clearly obtained . in ref . @xcite , dmrg was applied to an effective spin hamiltonian obtained from an su(4 ) spin - orbit critical state in 1d . other applications were done to enlarged symmetry cases with su(4 ) symmetry in order to study coherence in arrays of quantum dots@xcite , to obtain the phase diagram for 1d spin orbital models@xcite and dynamical properties in a magnetic field@xcite . dimerization and frustration have been considered in refs . @xcite and alternating spin chains in @xcite . the case of several coupled spin chains ( ladder models ) have been investigated in @xcite , spin ladders with cyclic four - spin exchanges in @xcite and kagome antiferromagnets in @xcite . zigzag spin chains have been considered in @xcite and spin chains of coupled triangles in @xcite . as the dmrg s performance is optimal in open systems , an interesting analysis of the boundary effect on correlation functions is done in @xcite . magnetization properties and plateaus for quantum spin ladder systems@xcite have also been studied . an interesting review on the applications to some exact and analytical techniques for quantum magnetism in low dimension , including dmrg , is presented in @xcite . there has been a great amount of applications to fermionic systems such as 1d hubbard and t - j models @xcite , luttinger liquids with boundaries@xcite , the falicov - kimball model @xcite , the quasiperiodic aubry - andre chain@xcite and fibonacci - hubbard models@xcite . it has also been applied to field theory@xcite . the method has been very successful for several band hubbard models@xcite , hubbard ladders @xcite and t - j ladders@xcite . also several coupled chains at different dopings have been considered @xcite as well as flux phases in these systems @xcite . time reversal symmetry - broken fermionic ladders have been studied in @xcite and power laws in spinless - fermion ladders in @xcite . long - range coulomb interactions in the 1d electron gas and the formation of a wigner crystal was studied in @xcite . several phases including the wigner crystal , incompressible and compressible liquid states , stripe and pairing phases , have been found using dmrg for 2d electrons in high magnetic fields considering different landau levels@xcite . persistent currents in mesoscopic systems have been considered in @xcite . quite large quasi-2d systems can be reached , for example in @xcite where a 4x20 lattice was considered to study ferromagnetism in the infinite - u hubbard model ; the ground state of a 4-leg t - j ladder in @xcite ; the one and two hole ground state in 9x9 and 10x7 t - j lattices in @xcite ; a doped 3-leg t - j ladder in @xcite ; the study of striped phases in @xcite ; domain walls in 19x8 t - j systems in @xcite ; the 2d t - j model in @xcite and the magnetic polaron in a 9x9 t - j lattice in @xcite . also big @xmath54 spin-1/2 lattices reaching 24x11 sites@xcite have been studied . there have been some recent attempts to implement dmrg in two and higher dimensions @xcite but the performance is still poorer than in 1d . a recent extension using a two - step dmrg algorithm for highly anisotropic spin systems has shown promising results@xcite . impurity problems have been studied for example in one- @xcite and two - impurity @xcite kondo systems , in spin chains @xcite and in luttinger liquids @xcite . there have also been applications to kondo and anderson lattices @xcite , kondo lattices with localized @xmath55 configurations @xcite , the two - channel kondo lattice on a ladder @xcite , a t - j chain coupled to localized kondo spins@xcite and ferromagnetic kondo models for manganites @xcite . there have been several extensions to dmrg like the inclusion of symmetries to the method such as spin and parity@xcite . total spin conservation and continuous symmetries have been treated in @xcite and in interaction - round a face hamiltonians@xcite , a formulation that can be applied to rotational - invariant sytems like @xmath39 and 2 chains@xcite . a momentum representation of this technique @xcite that allows for a diagonalization in a fixed momentum subspace has been developed as well as applications in dimension higher than one@xcite and bethe lattices@xcite . the inclusion of symmetries is essential to the method since it allows to consider a smaller number of states , enhance precision and obtain eigenstates with definite quantum numbers . other recent applications have been in nuclear shell model calculations where a two level pairing model has been considered@xcite and in the study of ultrasmall superconducting grains , in this case , using the particle ( hole ) states around the fermi level as the system ( environment ) block@xcite . a very interesting and successful application is a recent work in high energy physics@xcite . here the dmrg is used in an asymptotically free model with bound states , a toy model for quantum chromodynamics , namely the two dimensional delta - function potential . for this case an algorithm similar to the momentum space dmrg@xcite was used where the block and environment consist of low and high energy states respectively . the results obtained here are much more accurate than with the similarity renormalization group@xcite and a generalization to field - theoretical models is proposed based on the discreet light - cone quantization in momentum space@xcite . below we briefly mention other important extensions , leaving the calculation of dynamical properties for the next section . the dmrg has been very successfully extended to study classical systems . for a detailed description we refer the reader to ref . @xcite . since 1d quantum systems are related to 2d classical systems@xcite , it is natural to adapt dmrg to the classical 2d case . this method is based on the renormalization group transformation for the transfer matrix @xmath56 ( tmrg ) . it is a variational method that maximizes the partition function using a limited number of degrees of freedom , where the variational state is written as a product of local matrices@xcite . for 2d classical systems , this algorithm is superior to the classical monte carlo method in accuracy , speed and in the possibility of treating much larger systems . a recent improvement of this method considering periodic boundary conditions is given in @xcite and a detailed comparison between symmetric and asymmetric targetting is done in @xcite . tmrg has also been successfully used to renormalize stochastic transfer matrices in a study of cellular automatons@xcite . the calculation of thermodynamical properties of 3d classical statistical systems has been proposed@xcite where the eigenstate of the transfer matrix with maximum eigenvalue is represented by the product of local tensors optimized using dmrg . a further improvement to this method is based on the corner transfer matrix@xcite , the ctmrg@xcite and can be generalized to any dimension@xcite . it was first applied to the ising model@xcite and also to the potts model@xcite , where very accurate density profiles and critical indices were calculated . further applications have included non - hermitian problems in equilibrium and non - equilibrium physics . in the first case , transfer matrices may be non - hermitian and several situations have been considered : a model for the quantum hall effect@xcite , the @xmath57-symmetric heisenberg chain related to the conformal series of critical models@xcite and the anisotropic triangular nearest and next - nearest neighbour ising models@xcite . in the second case , the adaptation of the dmrg to non - equilibrium physics like the asymmetric exclusion problem@xcite and reaction - diffusion problems @xcite has shown to be very successful . it has also been applied to stochastic lattice models like in @xcite and to the 2d xy model @xcite . the adaptation of the dmrg method for classical systems paved the way for the study of 1d quantum systems at non zero temperature , by using the trotter - suzuki method @xcite . in this case the system is infinite and the finiteness is in the level of the trotter approximation . standard dmrg usually produces its best results for the ground state energy and less accurate results for higher excitations . a different situation occurs here : the lower the temperature , the less accurate the results . very nice results have been obtained for the dimerized , @xmath42 , xy model , where the specific heat was calculated involving an extremely small basis set@xcite ( @xmath58 ) , the agreement with the exact solution being much better in the case where the system has a substantial gap . it has also been used to calculate thermodynamical properties of the anisotropic @xmath42 heisenberg model , with relative errors for the spin susceptibility of less than @xmath59 down to temperatures of the order of @xmath60 keeping @xmath61 states@xcite . a complete study of thermodynamical properties like magnetization , susceptibility , specific heat and temperature dependent correlation functions for the @xmath42 and 3/2 heisenberg models was done in @xcite . other applications have been the calculation of the temperature dependence of the charge and spin gap in the kondo insulator@xcite , the calculation of thermodynamical properties of ferrimagnetic chains@xcite and spin ladders@xcite , the study of impurity properties in spin chains@xcite , frustrated quantum spin chains@xcite , t - j@xcite and spin ladders@xcite and dimerized frustrated heisenberg chains@xcite . an alternative way of incorporating temperature into the dmrg procedure was developed by moukouri and caron@xcite . they considered the standard dmrg taking into account several low - lying target states ( see eq . [ eq : pl ] ) to construct the density matrix , weighted with the boltzmann factor ( @xmath62 is the inverse temperature ) : @xmath63 with this method they performed reliable calculations of the magnetic susceptibility of quantum spin chains with @xmath42 and @xmath64 , showing excellent agreement with bethe ansatz exact results . they also calculated low temperature thermodynamical properties of the 1d kondo lattice model@xcite and of organic conductors @xcite . zhang et al.@xcite applied the same method in the study of a magnetic impurity embedded in a quantum spin chain . a significant limitation to the dmrg method is that it requires a finite basis and calculations in problems with infinite degrees of freedom per site require a large truncation of the basis states@xcite . however , jeckelmann and white developed a way of including phonons in dmrg calculations by transforming each boson site into several artificial interacting two - state pseudo - sites and then applying dmrg to this interacting system@xcite ( called the pseudo - site system " ) . the idea is based on the fact that dmrg is much better able to handle several few - states sites than few many - state sites@xcite . the key idea is to substitute each boson site with @xmath65 states into @xmath7 pseudo - sites with 2 states@xcite . they applied this method to the holstein model for several hundred sites ( keeping more than a hundred states per phonon mode ) obtaining negligible error . in addition , up to date , this method is the most accurate one to determine the ground state energy of the polaron problem ( holstein model with a single electron ) . an alternative method ( the optimal phonon basis")@xcite is a procedure for generating a controlled truncation of a large hilbert space , which allows the use of a very small optimal basis without significant loss of accuracy . the system here consists of only one site and the environment has several sites , both having electronic and phononic degrees of freedom . the density matrix is used to trace out the degrees of freedom of the environment and extract the most relevant states of the site in question . in following steps , more bare phonons are included to the optimal basis obtained in this way . this method was successfully applied to study the interactions induced by quantum fluctuations in quantum strings , as an application to cuprate stripes@xcite and the dissipative two - state system @xcite . a variant of this scheme is the four block method " , as described in @xcite . they obtain very accurately the luttinger liquid - cdw insulator transition in the 1d holstein model for spinless fermions . the method has also been applied to pure bosonic systems such as the disordered bosonic hubbard model@xcite , where gaps , correlation functions and superfluid density are obtained . the phase diagram for the non - disordered bose - hubbard model , showing a reentrance of the superfluid phase into the insulating phase was calculated in ref . it has also been used to study a chain of oscillators with optical phonon spectrum @xcite and optical phonons in the quarter - filled hubbard model for organic conductors@xcite . the dmrg has also been generalized to 1d random and disordered systems , and applied to the random antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic heisenberg chains@xcite , including quasiperiodic exchange modulation@xcite and a detailed study of the haldane@xcite and griffiths phase@xcite in these systems . strongly disordered spin ladders have been considered in @xcite . it has also been used in disordered fermi systems such as the spinless model@xcite . in particular , the transition from the fermi glass to the mott insulator and the strong enhancement of persistent currents in the transition was studied in correlated one - dimensional disordered rings@xcite . disorder - induced crossover effects at quantum critical points were studied in @xcite . there have been several applications to molecules and polymers , such as the pariser - parr - pople ( ppp ) hamiltonian for a cyclic polyene@xcite ( where long - range interactions are included ) , magnetic keplerate molecules @xcite , molecular iron rings@xcite and polyacenes considering long range interactions @xcite . it has also been applied to conjugated organic systems ( polymers ) , adapting the dmrg to take into account the most important symmetries in order to obtain the desired excited states@xcite . also conjugated one - dimensional semiconductors @xcite have been studied , in which the standard approach can be extended to complex 1d oligomers where the fundamental repeat is not just one or two atoms , but a complex molecular building block . relatively new fields of application are the calculation of dynamical properties in the rubinstein - duke model for reptons @xcite and excitons in dendrimer molecules@xcite . recent attempts to apply dmrg to the _ ab initio _ calculation of electronic states in molecules have been successful@xcite . here , dmrg is applied within the conventional quantum chemical framework of a finite basis set with non - orthogonal basis functions centered on each atom . after the standard hartree - fock ( hf ) calculation in which a hamiltonian is produced within the orthogonal hf basis , dmrg is used to include correlations beyond hf , where each orbital is treated as a site " in a 1d lattice . one important difference with standard dmrg is that , as the interactions are long - ranged , several operators must be kept , making the calculation somewhat cumbersome . however , very accurate results have been obtained in a check performed in a water molecule ( keeping up to 25 orbitals and @xmath66 states per block ) , obtaining an offset of 0.00024hartrees with respect to the exact ground state energy@xcite , a better performance than any other approximate method@xcite . in order to avoid the non - locality introduced in the treatment explained above , white introduced the concept of _ orthlets _ , local , orthogonal and compact wave functions that allow prior knowledge about singularities to be incorporated into the basis and an adequate resolution for the cores@xcite . the most relevant functions in this basis are chosen via the density matrix . an application based on the combination with the momentum version of dmrg is used in @xcite to calculate the ground state of several molecules . the dmrg was originally developed to calculate static ground state properties and low - lying energies . however , it can also be useful to calculate dynamical response functions . these are of great interest in condensed matter physics in connection with experiments such as nuclear magnetic resonance ( nmr ) , neutron scattering , optical absorption , photoemission , etc . we will describe three different methods in this section . a recent development for calculating response functions in single impurity systems in the presence of a magnetic field was done in @xcite by using the dmrg within wilson s nrg to obtain the green s function . an interesting extension of dmrg to tackle time - dependent quantum many - body systems out of equilibrium was considered by cazalilla and marston@xcite . an effective way of extending the basic ideas of this method to the calculation of dynamical quantities is described in ref.@xcite . it is important to notice here that due to the particular real - space construction , it is not possible to fix the momentum as a quantum number . however , we will show that by keeping the appropriate target states , a good value of momentum can be obtained . we want to calculate the following dynamical correlation function at @xmath67 : @xmath68 where @xmath69 is the hermitean conjugate of the operator @xmath70 , @xmath71 is the heisenberg representation of @xmath70 , and @xmath72 is the ground state of the system . its fourier transform is : @xmath73 where the summation is taken over all the eigenstates @xmath74 of the hamiltonian @xmath75 with energy @xmath76 , and @xmath77 is the ground state energy . defining the green s function @xmath78 the correlation function @xmath79 can be obtained as @xmath80 the function @xmath81 can be written in the form of a continued fraction : @xmath82 the coefficients @xmath83 and @xmath84 can be obtained using the following recursion equations @xcite : @xmath85 where @xmath86 for finite systems the green s function @xmath87 has a finite number of poles so only a certain number of coefficients @xmath83 and @xmath84 have to be calculated . the dmrg technique presents a good framework to calculate such quantities . with it , the ground state , hamiltonian and the operator @xmath70 required for the evaluation of @xmath79 are obtained . an important requirement is that the reduced hilbert space should also describe with great precision the relevant excited states @xmath88 . this is achieved by choosing the appropriate target states . for most systems it is enough to consider as target states the ground state @xmath11 and the first few @xmath89 with @xmath90 and @xmath91 as described above . in doing so , states in the reduced hilbert space relevant to the excited states connected to the ground state via the operator of interest @xmath70 are included . the fact that @xmath92 is an excellent trial state , in particular , for the lowest triplet excitations of the two - dimensional antiferromagnet was shown in ref . of course , if the number @xmath4 of states kept per block is fixed , the more target states considered , the less precisely each one of them is described . an optimal number of target states and @xmath4 have to be found for each case . due to this reduction , the algorithm can be applied up to certain lengths , depending on the states involved . for longer chains , the higher energy excitations will become inaccurate . proper sum rules have to be calculated to determine the errors in each case . as an application of the method we calculate @xmath93 for the 1d isotropic heisenberg model with spin @xmath42 . the spin dynamics of this model has been extensively studied . the lowest excited states in the thermodynamic limit are the des cloiseaux - pearson triplets @xcite , having total spin @xmath94 . the dispersion of this spin - wave branch is @xmath95 . above this lower boundary there exists a two - parameter continuum of excited triplet states that have been calculated using the bethe ansatz approach @xcite with an upper boundary given by @xmath96 . it has been shown @xcite , however , that there are excitations above this upper boundary due to higher order scattering processes , with a weight that is at least one order of magnitude lower than the spin - wave continuum . in fig . 2 we show the spectrum for @xmath97 and @xmath98 for different values of @xmath4 , where exact results are available for comparison . the delta peaks of eq . ( [ eq : szzn ] ) are broadened by a lorentzian for visualizing purposes . as expected , increasing @xmath4 gives more precise results for the higher excitations . this spectra has been obtained using the infinite - system method and more precise results are expected using the finite - system method , as described later . = 3.3 in = 2.75 in in fig . 3 we show the spectrum for two systems lengths and @xmath97 and @xmath99 keeping @xmath100 states and periodic boundary conditions . for this case it was enough to take 3 target states , _ i. e. _ @xmath11 , @xmath101 and @xmath102 . here we have used @xmath103 pairs of coefficients @xmath83 and @xmath84 , but we noticed that if we considered only the first ( @xmath104 ) coefficients @xmath83 and @xmath84 , the spectrum at low energies remains essentially unchanged . minor differences arise at @xmath105 . this is another indication that only the first @xmath106 are relevant for the low energy dynamical properties for finite systems . in the inset of fig . 3 the spectrum for @xmath99 and @xmath107 is shown . for this case we considered 5 target states _ i. e. _ @xmath11 , @xmath108 , @xmath109 and @xmath100 . here , and for all the cases considered , we have verified that the results are very weakly dependent on the weights @xmath29 of the target states ( see eq.([eq : pl ] ) ) as long as the appropriate target states are chosen . for lengths where this value of @xmath57 is not defined we took the nearest value . = 3.3 in = 2.75 in even though we are including states with a given momentum as target states , due to the particular real - space construction of the reduced hilbert space , this translational symmetry is not fulfilled and the momentum is not fixed . to check how the reduction on the hilbert space influences the momentum @xmath57 of the target state @xmath110 , we calculated the expectation values @xmath111 for all @xmath112 . if the momenta of the states were well defined , this value is proportional to @xmath113 if @xmath114 . for @xmath115 , @xmath116 . the momentum distribution for @xmath97 is shown in fig . 4 in a semilogarithmic scale where the @xmath117-axis has been shifted by .003 so as to have well - defined logarithms . we can see here that the momentum is better defined , even for much larger systems , but , as expected , more weight on other @xmath112 values arises for larger @xmath7 . as a check of the approximation we calculated the sum rule @xmath118 for @xmath107 , 5 target states and @xmath100 . we obtain a relative error of 0.86% . recently , important improvements to this method have been published @xcite : by considering the finite system method in open chains , khner and white obtained a higher precision in dynamical responses of spin chains . in order to define a momentum in an open chain and to avoid end effects , they introduce a filter function with weight centered in the middle of the chain and zero at the boundaries . recent applications of this method include the calculation of excitations in spin - orbital models ( su(4 ) ) in a magnetic field@xcite , spin dynamics in models for cuprate spin ladders including cyclic spin exchange@xcite , optical conductivity of the ionic hubbard model@xcite , excitations in the one - dimensional bose - hubbard model@xcite and the optical response in 1d mott insulators@xcite . in this section we have presented a method of calculating dynamical responses with dmrg . although the basis truncation is big , this method keeps only the most relevant states and , for example , even by considering a @xmath119 of the total hilbert space ( for @xmath107 only @xmath120 40000 states are kept ) a reasonable description of the low energy excitations is obtained . we show that it is also possible to obtain states with well defined momenta if the appropriate target states are used . introduced in ref . @xcite in the dmrg context and improved in ref . @xcite , this method focuses on a particular energy or energy window , allowing a more precise description in that range and the possibility of calculating spectra for higher energies . instead of using the tridiagonalization of the hamiltonian , but in a similar spirit regarding the important target states to be kept , the spectrum can be calculated for a given @xmath121 by using a correction vector ( related to the operator @xmath70 that can depend on momentum @xmath57 ) . following ( [ eq : din ] ) , the ( complex ) correction vector @xmath122 can be defined as : @xmath123 so the green s function can be calculated as @xmath124 separating the correction vector in real and imaginary parts @xmath125 we obtain @xmath126 and @xmath127 the former equation is solved using the conjugate gradient method . in order to keep the information of the excitations at this particular energy the following states are targeted in the dmrg iterations : the ground state @xmath128 , the first lanczos vector @xmath129 and the correction vector @xmath122 . even though only a certain energy is focused on , dmrg gives the correct excitations for an energy range surrounding this particular point so that by running several times for nearby frequencies , an approximate spectrum can be obtained for a wider region @xcite . a variational formulation of the correction vector technique which leads to more accurate excited energies and spectral weights has been developed in @xcite . it has been successfully applied to calculate the optical conductivity of mott insulators@xcite . this method@xcite relies on a moment expansion of the dynamical correlations using sum rules that depend only on static correlation functions which can be calculated with dmrg . with these moments , the green s functions can be calculated using the maximum entropy method . the first step is the calculation of sum rules . as an example , and following @xcite , the spin - spin correlation function @xmath130 of the heisenberg model is calculated where the operator @xmath70 of eq . ( [ eq : ca ] ) is @xmath131 and the sum rules are@xcite : @xmath132,s^z(-q ) ] \rangle \nonumber \\ & = & 2[1-\cos(q)]\sum_i\langle s^+_{i}s^-_{i+1}+s^-_{i}s^+_{i+1}\rangle\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath133 is the static susceptibility . these sum rules can be easily generalized to higher moments : @xmath134 ... ],s^z(-q)]\rangle \end{aligned}\ ] ] for @xmath12 odd . a similar expression is obtained for @xmath12 even , where the outer square bracket is replaced by an anticommutator and the total sign is changed . here @xmath75 appears in the commutator @xmath135 times . apart from the first moment which is given by the static susceptibility , all the other moments can be expressed as equal time correlations ( using a symbolic manipulator ) . the static susceptibility @xmath136 is calculated by applying a small field @xmath137 and calculating the density response @xmath138 with dmrg . then @xmath139 for @xmath140 . these moments are calculated for several chain lengths and extrapolated to the infinite system . once the moments are calculated , the final spectra is constructed via the maximum entropy method ( me ) , which has become a standard way to extract maximum information from incomplete data ( for details see ref . @xcite and references therein ) . reasonable spectra are obtained for the xy and isotropic models , although information about the exact position of the gaps has to be included . otherwise , the spectra are only qualitatively correct . this method requires the calculation of a large amount of moments in order to get good results : the more information given to the me equations , the better the result . in order to include temperature in the calculation of dynamical quantities , the transfer matrix rg described above ( tmrg@xcite ) was extended to obtain imaginary time correlation functions@xcite . after fourier transformation in the imaginary time axis , analytic continuation from imaginary to real frequencies is done using maximum entropy ( me ) . the combination of the tmrg and me is free from statistical errors and the negative sign problem of monte carlo methods . since we are dealing with the transfer matrix , the thermodynamic limit can be discussed directly without extrapolations . however , in the present scheme , only local quantities can be calculated . a systematic investigation of local spectral functions is done in ref . @xcite for the anisotropic heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain . the authors obtain good qualitative results especially for high temperatures but a quantitative description of peaks and gaps are beyond the method , due to the severe intrinsic limitation of the analytic continuation . this method was also applied with great success to the 1d kondo insulator@xcite . the temperature dependence of the local density of states and local dynamic spin and charge correlation functions were calculated . we have presented here a very brief description of the density matrix renormalization group technique , its applications and extensions . the aim of this article is to give the unexperienced reader an idea of the possibilities and scope of this powerful , though relatively simple method . the experienced reader can find here an extensive ( however incomplete ) list of references covering most applications to date using dmrg in a great variety of fields such as condensed matter , statistical mechanics and high energy physics . the author acknowledges hospitality at the centre de recherches mathematiques , university of montreal and at the physics department of the university of buenos aires , argentina , where this work has been performed . we thank s. white for a critical reading of the manuscript and all those authors that have updated references and sent instructive comments . k. h. is a fellow of conicet , argentina . grants : pict 03 - 00121 - 02153 and pict 03 - 00000 - 00651 . 999 s. white , phys . lett . * 69 * , 2863 ( 1992 ) , edited by i. peschel , x. wang , m. kaulke and k. hallberg ( series : lecture notes in physics , springer , berlin , 1999 ) s. white , phys . b * 48 * , 10345 ( 1993 ) j. bray and s. chui , phys . rev . b * 19 * , 4876 ( 1979 ) c. pan and x. chen , phys . b * 36 * , 8600 ( 1987 ) ; m. kovarik , phys . rev . b * 41 * , 6889 ( 1990 ) t. xiang and g. gehring , phys . b * 48 * , 303 ( 1993 ) k. wilson , _ rev . mod . phys . _ * 47 * , 773 ( 1975 ) s. white and r. noack , phys . . lett . * 68 * , 3487 , ( 1992 ) ; r. noack and s. white , phys . b * 47 * , 9243 ( 1993 ) j. gaite , mod . a*16 * , 1109 ( 2001 ) r. noack and s. white in ref . @xcite , chap . 2(i ) m. martn - delgado , g. sierra and r. noack , j. phys . a : math . gen . * 32 * , 6079 ( 1999 ) r. feynman , _ statistical mechanics : a set of lectures _ , ( benjamin , reading , ma , 1972 ) s. r. white , i. affleck and d. scalapino , phys . b * 65 * , 165122 ( 2002 ) see e. dagotto , rev . mod . phys . * 66 * , 763 ( 1994 ) e. r. davidson , j. comput . phys . * 17 * , 87 ( 1975 ) ; e.r . davidson , _ computers in physics _ * 7 * , no . 5 , 519 ( 1993 ) . t. osborne and m. nielsen , quantum information processing , volume 1 , issue 1 - 2 , 45 ( 2002 ) ( available on - line : http://www.kluweronline.com/issn/1570-0755/ ) s. white , phys . lett . * 77 * , 3633 ( 1996 ) t. nishino and k. okunishi , phys . 64 * , 4084 ( 1995 ) ; u. schollwck , phys . rev . b * 58 * , 8194 ( 1998 ) and phys . rev . b * 59 * , 3917 ( 1999 ) ( erratum ) . . legeza and g. fth , phys . b * 53 * , 14349 ( 1996 ) ; m - b lepetit and g. pastor , phys . rev . b * 58 * , 12691 ( 1998 ) s. stlund and s. rommer , phys . rev . lett . * 75 * , 3537 ( 1995 ) ; phys . b * 55 * , 2164 ( 1997 ) ; m. andersson , m. boman and s. stlund , phys . b * 59 * , 10493 ( 1999 ) ; h. takasaki , t. hikihara and t. nishino , j. phys . soc * 68 * , 1537 ( 1999 ) ; k. okunishi , y. hieida and y.akutsu , phys . e * 59 * , r6227 ( 1999 ) m. a. martn - delgado and g. sierra , int a , * 11 * , 3145 ( 1996 ) g. sierra and m. a. martn - delgado , in `` the exact renormalization group '' by a krasnitz , r potting , y a kubyshin and p. s. de sa ( eds . ) world scientific pub co ; isbn : 9810239394 , ( 1999 ) , ( cond - mat/9811170 ) i. peschel , m. kaulke and . legeza , annalen der physik * 8 * , 153 ( 1999),(cond - mat/9810174 ) s. r. white and d. huse , phys . rev . b * 48 * , 3844 ( 1993 ) e. s. srensen and i. affleck , phys . b * 49 * , 13235 ( 1994 ) e. s. srensen and i. affleck , phys . rev . b * 49 * , 15771 ( 1994 ) ; e. polizzi , f. mila and e. srensen , phys . rev . b * 58 * , 2407 ( 1998 ) c. batista , k. hallberg and a. aligia , phys . rev . b * 58 * , 9248 ( 1998 ) ; phys . rev . b * 60 * , 12553 ( 1999 ) ; physica b , * 259 * , 1017 ( 1999 ) ; e. jannod , c. payen , k. schoumacker , c. batista , k. hallberg and a. aligia , phys . rev b , * 62 * , 2998 ( 2000 ) m. laukamp et al . b * 5 * , 10755 ( 1998 ) t - k . ng , j. lou and z. su , phys . b * 61 * , 11487 ( 2000 ) j. lou , s. qin , t - k . ng , z. su and i. affleck , phys . b * 62 * , 3786 ( 2000 ) s - w tsai and j. b. marston , ann . phys . ( leipzig ) 8 , special issue , 261 ( 1999 ) m. sieling , u. lw , b. wolf , s. schmidt , s. zvyagin and b.lthi , phys . b * 61 * , 88 ( 2000 ) y. nishiyama , k. totsuka , n. hatano and m. suzuki , j. phys . soc . jpn * 64 * , 414 ( 1995 ) s. qin , t. ng and z - b su , phys . b * 52 * , 12844 ( 1995 ) u. schollwck and t. jolicoeur , europhys . lett . * 30 * , 493 ( 1995 ) x. wang , s. qin and lu yu , phys . b. * 60 * , 14529 ( 1999 ) w. tatsuaki , phys . e * 61 * , 3199 ( 2000 ) ; t. wada and t. nishino , cond - mat/0103508 ( proceedings of the conference on computational physics 2000 ( ccp2000 ) , gold coast , queensland , australia , 3 - 8 december 2000 ) m. capone and s. caprara , phys . b * 64 * , 184418 ( 2001 ) j. lou , x. dai , s. qin , z. su and l. yu , phys . rev . b * 60 * , 52 ( 1999 ) e. ercolessi , g. morandi , p. pieri and m. roncaglia , europhys . lett . * 49 * , 434 ( 2000 ) s. qin , x. wang and lu yu , phys . b * 56 * , r14251 ( 1997 ) k. hallberg , p. horsch and g. martnez , phys . rev . b , * 52 * , r719 ( 1995 ) h. e. boos , v. e. korepin , y. nishiyama and m. shiroishi , j. phys . a*35 * , 4443 ( 2002 ) ; v. e. korepin , s. lukyanov , y. nishiyama and m. shiroishi , cond - mat/0210140 m. shiroishi , m. takahashi and y. nishiyama , j. phys . * 70 * , 3535 ( 2001 ) t. hikihara and a. furusaki , phys . b * 58 * , r583 ( 1998 ) g. fath , cond - mat/0208580 j. lou , s. qin , c. chen , z. su and l. yu , phys . rev . b * 65 * , 064420 ( 2002 ) f. capraro and c. gros , cond - mat/0207279 y. hieida , k. okunishi and y. akutsu , phys . rev . b * 64 * , 224422 ( 2001 ) t. byrnes , r. bursill , h - p . eckle , c. hamer and a. sandvik , cond - mat/0205140 s - w . tsai and j. b. marston , phys . b * 62 * , 5546 ( 2000 ) k. hallberg , x. wang , p. horsch and a. moreo , phys . rev . lett . * 76 * , 4955 ( 1996 ) a. moreo , phys . rev . b * 35 * , 8562 ( 1987 ) ; t. ziman and h. schulz , phys . lett * 59 * , 140 ( 1987 ) y. yamashita , n. shibata and k. ueda , phys . b * 58 * , 9114 ( 1998 ) ; j. phys . vol.69 , 242 - 247 ( 2000 ) ; phys . b * 61 * , 4012 ( 2000 ) a. onufriev and b. marston , phys . rev . b * 59 * , 12573 ( 1999 ) c. itoi , s. qin and i. affleck , phys . rev . b * 61 * , 6747 ( 2000 ) w. yu and s. haas , phys . rev . b * 63 * , 024423 ( 2001 ) r. j. bursill , t. xiang and g. a. gehring , j.phys . a * 28 * 2109 ( 1994 ) r. j. bursill , g. a. gehring , d. j. j. farnell , j. b. parkinson , t. xiang and c. zeng , j. phys . c * 7 * 8605 ( 1995 ) u. schollwck , th . jolicoeur and t. garel , phys . b * 53 * , 3304 ( 1996 ) r. chitra , s. pati , h. r. krishnamurthy , d. sen and s. ramasesha , phys . b * 52 * , 6581 ( 1995 ) ; s. pati , r. chitra , d. sen , h. r. krishnamurthy and s. ramasesha , europhys . * 33 * , 707 ( 1996 ) ; j. malek , s. drechsler , g. paasch and k. hallberg , phys . b * 56 * , r8467 ( 1997 ) ; e. srensen et al in ref.@xcite , chap.1.2 ( part ii ) and references therein ; d. augier , e. srensen , j. riera and d. poilblanc , phys . rev . b * 60 * , 1075 ( 1999 ) y. kato and a. tanaka , j. phys . jpn . * 63 * , 1277 ( 1994 ) s. r. white and i. affleck , phys . b * 54 * , 9862 ( 1996 ) g. bouzerar , a. kampf and g. japaridze , phys . rev . b * 58 * , 3117 ( 1998 ) ; g. bouzerar , a. kampf and f. schnfeld , cond - mat/9701176 , unpublished ; m - b . lepetit and g. pastor , phys . b * 56 * , 4447 ( 1997 ) m. kaburagi , h. kawamura and t. hikihara , j. phys . soc . jpn . * 68*. 3185 ( 1999 ) t. hikihara , j. phys . . jpn . * 71 * , 319 ( 2002 ) ; t. hikihara , m. kaburagi , h. kawamura and t. tonegawa , phys . b * 63 * , 174430 ( 2001 ) s. pati , s. ramasesha and d. sen , phys . rev . b * 55 * , 8894 ( 1996 ) ; j. phys . cond * 9 * , 8707 ( 1997 ) ; t. tonegawa _ et al _ , j. mag . * 177 - 181 * , 647 ( 1998 ) , ( cond - mat/9712298 ) m. azzouz , l. chen and s. moukouri , phys . b * 50 * 6223 ( 1994 ) ; s. r. white , r. m. noack and d. j. scalapino , phys . lett . * 73 * 886 ( 1994 ) ; k. hida , j. phys . jpn . * 64 * 4896 ( 1995 ) ; t. narushima , t. nakamura and s. takada , j. phys . * 64 * 4322 ( 1995 ) ; u. schollwck and d. ko , phys . b * 53 * 240 ( 1996 ) ; g. sierra , m. a. martn - delgado , s. white and j. dukelsky , phys . b * 59 * , 7973 ( 1999 ) ; s. white , phys . rev . b * 53 * , 52 ( 1996 ) a. kawaguchi , a. koga , k. okunishi and n. kawakami , cond - mat/0205635 a. trumper and c. gazza , phys . rev . b * 64 * , 134408 ( 2001 ) m. roger , phys . rev . b * 63 * , 144433 ( 2001 ) t. hikihara and a. furusaki , phys . rev . b * 63 * , 134438 ( 2001 ) a. laeuchli , g. schmida and m. troyer , cond - mat/0206153 t. hikihara , t. momoi and x. hu , cond - mat/0206102 t. nunner , p. brune , t. kopp , m. windt and m. grninger , cond - mat/0203472 y. honda and t. horiguchi , cond - mat/0106426 s. k. pati and r. r. p. singh , phys . rev . b * 60 * , 7695 ( 1999 ) ; s. r. white and r. singh , phys . lett . * 85 * , 3330 ( 2000 ) n. maeshima , m. hagiwara , y. narumi , k. kindo , t. c. kobayashi and k. okunishi , cond - mat/0208373 ; n. maeshima and k. okunishi , phys . b * 62 * , 934 - 939 ( 2000 ) c. itoi and s. qin , phys . b * 63 * , 224423 ( 2001 ) j. lou , j. dai , s. qin , z. su and l. yu , phys . rev . b * 62 * , 8600 ( 2000 ) c. raghu , i. rudra , s. ramasesha and d. sen , phys . rev . b * 62 * , 9484 ( 2000 ) a. honecker , m. kaulke and k.d . schotte , eur . j. b * 15 * , 423 ( 2000 ) a. gendiar and a. surda , phys . b * 62 * , 3960 ( 2000 ) k. tandon et al , phys . rev . b * 59 * , 396 ( 1999 ) ; r. citro , e. orignac , n. andrei , c. itoi and s. qin , j. phys.:cond . mat . * 12 * , 3041 ( 2000 ) j. lou , c. chen and s. qin , phys . rev . b * 64 * , 144403 ( 2001 ) x. wang and l. yu , phys lett . * 84 * , 5399 ( 2000 ) s. k. pati , s. ramasesha and d. sen , in _ magnetism : molecules to materials iv _ , j.s . miller and m. drillon ( wiley - vch weinheim , 2002 ) , chapter 4 , ( cond - mat/0106621 ) l. chen and s. moukouri , phys . b * 53 * 1866 ( 1996 ) ; s. j. qin , s. d. liang , z. b. su and l. yu , phys . b * 52 * r5475 ( 1995 ) ; r. noack in ref.@xcite , chap.1.3 ( part ii ) ; s. daul and r. noack , phys . rev . b * 61 * , 12361 ( 2000 ) ; m. vojta , r. hetzel and r. noack , phys . b * 60 * , r8417 ( 1999 ) k. penc , k. hallberg , f. mila and h. shiba , phys . * 77 * , 1390 ( 1996 ) ; phys . b , * 55 * , 15475 ( 1997 ) n. bulut , cond - mat/0207186 , to appear in advances in physics , * 51 * , no . 6 ( 2002 ) a. malvezzi , t. paiva and r. dos santos , cond - mat/0205266 e. jeckelmann , cond - mat/0204244 y. zhang , c. wu and h. q.lin , phys . b * 65 * , 115101 ( 2002 ) c. aebischer , d. baeriswyl and r. m. noack , phys . rev . lett . * 86 * , 468 ( 2001 ) r. arita and h. aoki , phys . b * 61 * , 12261 ( 2000 ) ; r. arita , y. shimoi , k. kuroki and h. aoki , phys . rev . b * 57 * , 10609 ( 1998 ) s. daul , cond - mat/9911361 s. qin , j. lou , t. xiang , g - s . tian and z. su , cond - mat/0004162 a. aligia , k. hallberg , c. batista and g. ortiz , phys . b * 61 * , 7883 ( 2000 ) v. meden , w. metzner , u. schollwoeck , o. schneider , t. stauber and k. schoenhammer , , europhys . j b * 16 * , 631 ( 2000 ) p. farkasovsky , phys . rev . b * 65 * , 081102 ( 2002 ) c. schuster , r. roemer and m. schreiber , phys . rev . b * 65 * , 115114 ( 2002 ) k. hida , phys . lett . * 86 * , 1331 ( 2001 ) w. lay and j. rudnick , phys . lett . * 88 * , 057203 ( 2002 ) ; y. nishiyama , j.phys . a*34 * , 11215 ( 2001 ) ; s. g. chung , phys . e * 62 * , 3262 ( 2000 ) b. srinivasan and m. b. lepetit , phys . b * 66 * , 024421 ( 2002 ) ; h. sakamoto , t. momoi and k. kubo , phys . b * 65 * , 224403 ( 2002 ) k. hamacher , c. gros and w. wenzel , phys . rev . lett . * 88 * , 217203 ( 2002 ) m. vojta , a. huebsch and r. m. noack , phys . b * 63 * , 045105 ( 2001 ) ; z. weihong , j. oitmaa , c.j . hamer and r.j . bursill , j. phys . c * 13 * , 433 ( 2001 ) youngho park , s. liang and t. k. lee , phys . b * 59 * , 2587 ( 1999 ) s. rommer , s. r. white and d. j. scalapino , phys . rev . b * 61 * , 13424 ( 2000 ) r. m. noack , s. r. white and d. j. scalapino , phys lett . * 73 * , 882 ( 1994 ) ; s. r. white , r. m. noack and d. j. scalapino , j. low temp . phys . * 99 * , 593 ( 1995 ) ; r. m. noack , s. r. white and d. j. scalapino , europhys . lett . * 30 * , 163 ( 1995 ) ; c. a. hayward , d. poilblanc , r. m. noack , d. j. scalapino and w. hanke , phys . lett . * 75 * , 926 ( 1995 ) ; s. white and d. scalapino , phys . rev . lett . * 81 * , 3227 ( 1998 ) ; e. jeckelmann , d. scalapino and s. white , phys . rev . b * 58 * , 9492 ( 1998 ) s. nishimoto , e. jeckelmann and d. scalapino , cond - mat/0208189 j. b. marston , j. o. fjaerestad and a. sudbo , phys . rev . lett . * 89 * , 056404 ( 2002 ) u.schollwoeck , sudip chakravarty , j. o. fjaerestad , j. b. marston and m. troyer , cond - mat/0209444 l. g. caron and c. bourbonnais , phys . rev . b * 66 * , 045101 ( 2002 ) g. fano , f. ortolani , a. parola and l. ziosi , phys . rev . b * 60 * , 15654 ( 1999 ) n. shibata and d. yoshioka , phys . 86 * , 5755 ( 2001 ) ; physica e * 12 * , 43 ( 2002 ) d. yoshioka and n. shibata , j. phys . . jpn . * 70 * , 3690 ( 2001 ) v. meden and u. schollwck , cond - mat/0209588 s. liang and h. pang , europhys . lett . * 32 * , 173 ( 1995 ) s. white and d. scalapino , phys . rev . b * 55 * , 14701 ( 1997 ) s. white and d. scalapino , phys . rev . b * 55 * , 6504 ( 1997 ) s. white and d. scalapino , phys . rev . b * 57 * , 3031 ( 1998 ) e. arrigoni , a. p. harju , w. hanke , b. brendel and s.a . kivelson , phys . b * 65 * , 134503 ( 2002 ) ; j. bonca , j. e. gubernatis , m. guerrero , e. jeckelmann and s. r. white , phys . rev . b * 61 * , 3251 ( 2000 ) ; a. l. chernyshev , s. white and a. h. castro neto , phys . rev . b , * 65 * , 214527 ( 2002 ) ; s. white and d. scalapino , phys . rev . b * 61 * , 6320 ( 2000 ) s. white and d. scalapino , phys . rev . lett . * 80 * , 1272 ( 1998 ) ( see also cond - mat/9907375 ) i. p. mcculloch , a. r. bishop and m. gulacsi , phil . mag . b * 81 * , 1603 ( 2001 ) s. r. white and i. affleck , phys . rev . b * 64 * , 024411 ( 2001 ) t. xiang , j. lou and z. su , phys . rev . b * 64 * , 104414 ( 2001 ) ; p. henelius , phys . rev . b * 60 * , 9561 ( 1999 ) s. nishimoto , e. jeckelmann , f. gebhard and r. noack , phys . b * 65 * , 165114 ( 2002 ) n. maeshima , y. hieida , y. akutsu , t. nishino and k. okunishi , phys . rev . e * 64 * ( 2001 ) 016705 m.a . martin - delgado , j. rodriguez - laguna and g. sierra , nucl . b * 601 * , 569 ( 2001 ) p. henelius , phys . b * 60 * , 9561 ( 1999 ) s. moukouri and l. g. caron , cond - mat/0210668 t. a. costi , p. schmitteckert , j. kroha and p. wlfle , phys . lett . * 73 * , 1275 ( 1994 ) ; s. eggert and i. affleck , phys . rev . lett . * 75 * , 934 ( 1995 ) ; e. s. srensen and i. affleck , phys . b * 51*. 16115 ( 1995 ) ; x. q. wang and s. mallwitz , phys . rev . b * 53 * , r492 ( 1996 ) ; w. wang , s. j. qin , z. y. lu , l. yu and z. b. su , phys . b * 53 * , 40 ( 1996 ) ; c. c. yu and m. guerrero , phys . rev . b * 54 * , 15917 ( 1996 ) ; a. furusaki and t. hikihara , phys . rev . b * 58 * , 5529 ( 1998 ) k. hallberg and r. egger , phys . rev . b * 55 * , 8646 ( 1997 ) c. schuster and u. eckern , ann . phys . ( leipzig ) , * 11 * , 901 ( 2002 ) ( cond - mat/0201390 ) ; w. zhang , j. igarashi and p. fulde , phys . b * 56 * , 654 ( 1997 ) v. meden , w. metzner , u. schollwoeck and k. schoenhammer , phys . rev . b * 65 * , 045318 ( 2002 ) c. c. yu and s. r. white , phys . rev . lett . * 71 * , 3866 ( 1993 ) ; c. c. yu and s. r. white , physica b * 199 * , 454 ( 1994 ) s. moukouri and l. g. caron , phys . rev . b * 52 * , 15723 ( 1995 ) ; n. shibata , t. nishino , k. ueda and c. ishii , phys . b * 53 * , r8828 ( 1996 ) ; m. guerrero and r. m. noack , phys . b * 53 * , 3707 ( 1996 ) h. otsuka and t. nishino , phys . b * 52 * , 15066 ( 1995 ) ; s. moukouri , l. g. caron , c. bourbonnais and l. hubert , phys . b * 51 * , 15920 ( 1995 ) j. c. xavier , e. novais and e. miranda , phys . b * 65 * , 214406 ( 2002 ) t. yamamoto , r. manago and y. mori , cond - mat/0204588 i. p. mcculloch , a. juozapavicius , a. rosengren and m. gulacsi , phys . rev . b * 65 * , 052410 ( 2002 ) m. guerrero and r.m . noack , phys . rev . b * 63 * , 144423 ( 2001 ) s. watanabe , j. phys . . jpn . * 69 * , 2947 ( 2000 ) i. p. mcculloch , m. gulacsi , s. caprara and a. juozapavicius , j. low temp . 117 , 323 ( 1999 ) j. xavier , r. pereira , e. miranda and i. affleck , cond - mat/0209623 s. watanabe , y. kuramoto , t. nishino and n. shibata , j. phys . soc . jpn * 68 * , 159 ( 1999 ) j. moreno , s. qin , p. coleman and l. yu , phys . b * 64 * , 085116 ( 2001 ) s. moukouri , l. chen and l. g. caron , phys . rev . b * 53 * , r488 ( 1996 ) j. riera , k. hallberg and e. dagotto , phys . rev . lett . * 79 * , 713 ( 1997 ) ; e. dagotto et al . , b * 58 * , 6414 ( 1998 ) d. garca , k. hallberg , c. batista , m. avignon and b. alascio , phys . rev lett . , * 85 * , 3720 ( 2000 ) ; d. j. garca , k. hallberg , c. d. batista , s. capponi , d. poilblanc , m. avignon and b. alascio , phys . rev . b. * 65 * , 134444 ( 2002 ) b. ammon and m. imada , j. phys . . jpn . * 70 * , 547 ( 2001 ) s. ramasesha et al , phys . b * 54 * , 7598 ( 1996 ) ; synth . metals * 85 * , 1019 ( 1997 ) e. s. srensen and i. affleck , phys . b * 51 * , 16115 ( 1995 ) i. mcculloch and m. gulacsi , europhys . lett . * 57 * , 852 ( 2002 ) g. sierra and t. nishino , nucl . b * 495 * , 505 ( 1997 ) ( cond - mat/9610221 ) t. xiang , phys . b * 53 * , r10445 ( 1996 ) m.s.l . du croo de jongh and j.m.j . van leeuwen , phys . b * 57 * , 8494 ( 1998 ) m - b . lepetit , m. cousy and g. pastor , eur . j. b * 13 * , 421 ( 2000 ) ; h. otsuka , phys . rev . b * 53 * , 14004 ( 1996 ) j. dukelsky and g. dussel , phys . rev . b * 59 * , r3005 ( 1999 ) and references therein . j. dukelsky and g. sierra , phys . lett . * 83 * , 172 ( 1999 ) m. a. martn - delgado and g. sierra , phys . lett . * 83 * , 1514 ( 1999 ) s. glazek and k. wilson , phys . d * 48 * , 5863 ( 1993 ) ; * 49 * , 4214 ( 1994 ) t. eller , h .- c . pauli and s. brodsky , phys . d * 35 * , 1493 ( 1987 ) t. nishino , j. phys . . jpn . * 64 * , 3598 ( 1995 ) ; see also t. nishino in ref . @xcite , chap . 5(i ) ; t. nishino and k. okunishi in _ strongly correlated magnetic and superconducting systems _ , ed . g. sierra and m. a. martn - delgado ( springer , berlin , 1997 ) h. trotter , proc . * 10 * , 545 ( 1959 ) ; m. suzuki , prog . . phys . * 56 * , 1454 ( 1976 ) ; r. feynman and a. hibbs _ quantum mechanics and path integrals _ ( mcgraw - hill , 1965 ) a. gendiar and a. surda , phys . b * 63 * , 014401 ( 2001 ) t. nishino and n. shibata , j. phys . soc . jpn . * 68 * , 3501 ( 1999 ) ; t. enss and u. schollwoeck , j. phys . a * 34 * , 7769 ( 2001 ) a. kemper , a. schadschneider and j. zittartz , j. phys . a : math . gen . * 34 * , l279 ( 2001 ) ; t. enss and u. schollwck , j phys a : math . gen . * 34 * , 7769 ( 2001 ) r. baxter , j. math . phys . * 9 * , 650 ( 1968 ) ; j. stat phys . * 19 * , 461 ( 1978 ) t. nishino and k. okunishi , j. phys . soc . jpn . * 65*,891 ( 1996 ) ; ibid . * 66 * , 3040 ( 1997 ) ; t. nishino , k. okunishi and m. kikuchi , phys . a * 213 * , 69 ( 1996 ) h. takasaki , t. nishino and y. hieida , j. phys . . jpn . * 70 * , 1429 ( 2001 ) t. nishino , y. hieida , k. okunishi , n. maeshima , y. akutsu and a. gendiar , prog . theor . phys . * 105 * , 409 ( 2001 ) c. ritter and g. von gehlen , in `` quantization , gauge theory and strings '' , ed . et al . , vol.i , p.563 - 578 , scientific world publ.co . ( 2001 ) ( cond - mat/0009255 ) t. nishino and k. okunishi , j. phys . . jpn . * 67 * , 3066 ( 1998 ) ; t. nishino , k. okunishi , y. hieida , n. maeshima and y. akutsu , nucl . phys . b * 575 * , 504 ( 2000 ) e. carlon and a. drzewiski , phys . rev . lett . * 79 * , 1591 ( 1997 ) ; phys . e * 57 * , 2626 ( 1998 ) ; e. carlon , a. drzewiski and j. rogiers , phys . b * 58 * , 5070 ( 1998 ) ; a. drzewiski , a. ciach and a. maciolek , eur . j. b * 5 * , 825 ( 1998 ) ; phys . e * 60 * , 2887 ( 1999 ) a. drzewinski , a. maciolek and r. evans , phys . lett . * 85 * , 3079 ( 2000 ) ; a. drzewinski , phys . rev . e * 62 * , 4378 ( 2000 ) m .- c . chung , m. kaulke , i. peschel , m. pleimling and w. selke , eur . j. b * 18 * , 655 ( 2000 ) e. carlon and f. igli , phys . b * 57 * , 7877 ( 1998 ) ; phys . rev . b * 59 * , 3783 ( 1999 ) ; e. carlon , c. chatelain and b. berche , phys . rev . b * 60 * , 12974 ( 1999 ) j. kondev and j. marston , nucl . b * 497 * , 639 ( 1997 ) ; t. senthil , b. marston and m. fisher , phys . b * 60 * , 4245 ( 1999 ) ; j. marston and s. tsai , phys . lett . * 82 * , 4906 ( 1999 ) ; s. tsai and j. marston , ann . ( leipzig ) * 8 * , special issue , 261(1999 ) m. kaulke and i. peschel , eur . j. b * 5 * , 727 ( 1998 ) y. hieida , j. phys . . jpn . * 67 * , 369 ( 1998 ) i. peschel and m. kaulke , in ref . @xcite , chap . 3.1(ii ) e. carlon , m. henkel and u. schollwck , eur . phys . j. b * 12 * , 99(1999 ) ; e. carlon , m. henkel and u. schollwoeck , phys . e * 63 * , 036101 ( 2001 ) j. hooyberghs , e. carlon and c. vanderzande , phys . e * 62 * , 036124 ( 2001 ) s.g . chung , phys . b * 60 * , 11761(1999 ) r. bursill , t. xiang and g. gehring , j. phys . c * 8 * , l583 ( 1996 ) h. trotter , proc . * 10 * , 545 ( 1959 ) ; m. suzuki , prog . . phys . * 56 * , 1454 ( 1976 ) x. wang and t. xiang , phys . b * 56 * , 5061 ( 1997 ) n. shibata and k. ueda , j. phys . soc vol.70 , 3690 ( 2001 ) n. shibata , j. phys . . jpn . * 66 * , 2221 ( 1997 ) t. xiang , phys . b * 58 * , 9142 ( 1998 ) n. shibata , b. ammon , t. troyer , m. sigrist and k. ueda , j. phys . . jpn . * 67 * , 1086 ( 1998 ) k. maisinger , u. schollwck , s. brehmer , h - j . mikeska and s. yamamoto , phys . b * 58 * , r5908 ( 1998 ) s. rommer and s. eggert , phys . rev . b * 59 * , 6301 ( 1999 ) i. maruyama , n. shibata and k. ueda , phys . rev . b * 65 * , 174421 ( 2002 ) k. maisinger and u. schollwck , phys . rev . lett . * 81 * , 445 ( 1999 ) b. ammon , m. troyer , t. rice and n. shibata , phys . lett . * 82 * , 3855 ( 1999 ) ; n. shibata and h. tsunetsugu , j. phys . . jpn . * 68 * , 3138 ( 1999 ) f. naef and x. wang , phys . lett . * 84 * , 1320 ( 2000 ) a. klmper , r. raupach and f. schnfeld , phys . b * 59 * , 3612 ( 1999 ) s. moukouri and l. caron , phys . rev . lett . * 77 * , 4640 ( 1996 ) . s. moukouri and l. caron , see ref.@xcite , chap . 4.5(ii ) s. moukouri , cond - mat/0011169 w. zhang , j. igarashi and p. fulde , j. phys . . jpn . * 66 * , 1912 ( 1997 ) l. caron and s. moukouri , phys . lett . * 76 * , 4050 ( 1996 ) ; phys . b * 56 * , r8471 ( 1997 ) e. jeckelmann and s. white , phys . rev . b * 57 * , 6376 ( 1998 ) r. noack , s. white and d. scalapino in _ computer simulations in condensed matter physics vii _ , edited by d. landau , k .- k . mon and h .- b . schttler ( springer verlag , heidelberg and berlin , 1994 ) e. jeckelmann , c. zhang and s. white in ref . @xcite , chap . 5.1 ( ii ) c. zhang , e. jeckelmann and s. white , phys . lett . * 80 * , 2661 ( 1998 ) ; e. jeckelmann , c. zhang and s. r. white , physical review b * 60 * , 7950 ( 1999 ) y. nishiyama , cond - mat/0102123 eur . j. b * 12 * , 547 ( 1999 ) r. bursill , y. mckenzie and c. hammer , phys . lett . * 80 * , 5607 ( 1998 ) ; * 83 * , 408 ( 1999 ) ; r. bursill , phys . rev . b * 60 * , 1643 ( 1999 ) r. pai , r. pandit , h. krishnamurthy and s. ramasesha , phys . lett . * 76 * , 2937 ( 1996 ) ( see also the comment by n. v. prokofev and b. v. svistunov , phys . rev . lett . * 80 * , 4355 ( 1998 ) ) ; s. rapsch , u. schollwck and w. zwerger , europhys . lett . * 46 * , 559 ( 1999 ) t. khner and h. monien , phys . b * 58 * , r14741 ( 1998 ) i. peschel and m - c . chung , j. phys . gen . * 32 * , 8419 ( 1999 ) p. maurel and m - b . lepetit , phys . b * 62 * , 10744 ( 2000 ) ; p. maurel , m - b . lepetit and d. poilblanc , eur . j. * b 21 * , 481 ( 2001 ) k. hida , j. phys . . jpn . * 65 * , 895 ( 1996 ) and 3412 ( 1996 ) ( erratum ) ; j. phys . . jpn . * 66 * , 330 ( 1997 ) ; j. phys . . jpn . * 66 * , 3237 ( 1997 ) ; prog . . suppl . * 145 * , 320 ( 2002 ) k. hida , j. phys . . jpn . * 68 * , 3177 ( 1999 ) k. hida , phys . lett . * 83 * , 3297 ( 1999 ) f. igloi , r. juhasz and p. lajko , phys . lett . * 86 * , 1343 ( 2001 ) r. mlin , y - c . lin , p. lajk , h. rieger and f. igli , phys . b * 65 * , 104415 ( 2002 ) p. schmitteckert , t. schulze , c. schuster , p. schwab and u. eckern , phys . rev . lett . * 80 * , 560 ( 1998 ) ; p. schmitteckert and u. eckern , phys . b * 53 * , 15397 ( 1996 ) d. weinmann , p. schmitteckert , r. jalabert and j. pichard , eur j. b * 19 * , 139 - 156 ( 2001 ) p. schmitteckert , r. jalabert , d. weinmann and j. l. pichard , phys . lett . * 81 * , 2308 ( 1998 ) e. carlon , p. lajko and f. igli , phys . lett . * 87 * , 277201 ( 2001 ) g. fano , f. ortolani and l. ziosi , j. chem . phys . * 108 * , 9246 ( 1998),(cond - mat/9803071 ) ; r. bursill and w. barford , phys . rev . lett . * 82 * , 1514 ( 1999 ) m. exler and j. schnack , cond - mat/0205068 b. normand , x. wang , x. zotos and daniel loss , phys . b * 63 * , 184409 ( 2001 ) c. raghu , y. anusooya pati and s. ramasesha , journal - ref : j. phys . a * 34 * , 11215 ( 2001 ) w. barford and r. bursill , chem . . lett . * 268 * , 535(1997 ) ; w. barford , r. bursill and m. lavrentiev , j. phys : cond . matt , * 10 * , 6429 ( 1998 ) ; w. barford in ref.@xcite , chap.2.3 ( part ii ) and references therein ; m. lavrentiev , w. barford , s. martin , h. daly , r. bursill , physical review b * 59 * , 9987 ( 1999 ) e. carlon , a. drzewinski and j. van leeuwen , j. chem . phys . * 117 * , 2425 ( 2002 ) ; phys . rev . e * 64 * , 010801(r ) ( 2001 ) ; m. paessens and g. schtz , phys . e * 66 * , 021806 ( 2002 ) ; m. a. martn - delgado , j. rodriguez - laguna and g. sierra , phys . b * 65 * , 155116 ( 2002 ) s. white and r. martin , j. chem . phys . * 110 * , 4127 ( 1999 ) ; see also s. white in @xcite , chap . s. white in ref . @xcite , chap . 2.1 . . legeza , j. rder and b.a . hess , cond - mat/0208187 s. daul , i. ciofini , c. daul and s. r. white , int . j. of quantum chem . , * 79 * , 331(2000 ) ( cond - mat/9912348 ) c. bauschlicher and p. taylor , j. chem . phys . * 85 * , 2779 ( 1986 ) . legeza , j. roder and b. a. hess , cond - mat/0204602 w. hofstetter , phys . lett . * 85 * , 1508 ( 2000 ) m. a. cazalilla and j. b. marston , phys . rev . lett . * 88 * , 256403 ( 2002 ) k. hallberg , phys . b * 52 * , 9827 ( 1995 ) . e. r. gagliano and c. a. balseiro , phys . lett . * 59 * , 2999 ( 1987 ) . g. grosso and g. partori parravicini , in _ memory function approaches to stochastic problems in condensed matter _ , adv . in chemical physics , * 62 * , 133 ( wiley , n. y. , 1985 ) p. horsch and w. von der linden , z. phys . b * 72 * 181 ( 1981 ) j. des cloiseaux and j. j. pearson , phys . rev . * 128 * , 2131 ( 1962 ) t. yamada , prog . . jpn . * 41 * , 880 ( 1969 ) ; l. d. fadeev and l. a. takhtajan , phys . lett . * 85 a * , 375 ( 1981 ) g. mller , h. thomas , h. beck and j. bonner , phys . b * 24 * , 1429 ( 1981 ) and references therein . s. haas , j. riera and e. dagotto , phys . b * 48 * , 3281 ( 1993 ) t. khner and s. white , phys . rev . b * 60 * , 335(1999 ) p. brune , g. japaridze and a. p. kampf , cond - mat/0106007 ( unpublished ) t. d. khner , s. r. white and h. monien , phys . b * 61 * , 12474 ( 2000 ) s. s. kancharla and c. j. bolech , phys . rev . b * 64 * , 085119 ( 2001 ) y. anusooya , s. pati and s. ramasesha , j. chem . phys . * 106 * , 1 ( 1997 ) ; s. ramasesha , k. tandon , y. anusooya and s. pati , proc . of spie , * 3145 * , 282 ( 1997 ) ; s. ramasesha , z. shuai and j. brdas , chem . . lett . * 245 * , 224 ( 1995 ) e. jeckelmann , phys . b * 66 * , 045114 ( 2002 ) e. jeckelmann and f. gebhard , phys . rev . lett . * 85 * , 3910 ( 2000 ) ; f. essler , f. gebhard and e. jeckelmann , phys . rev . b * 64 * , 125119 ( 2001 ) ; e. jeckelmann , cond - mat/0208480 h. b. pang , h. akhlaghpour and m. jarrell , phys.rev . b * 53 * 5086 ( 1996 ) p. hohenberg and w. brinkman , phys . b * 10 * , 128 ( 1974 ) x. wang , k. hallberg and f. naef in ref.@xcite , chap.7(i ) t. mutou , n. shibata and k. ueda , phys . rev . lett * 81 * , 4939 ( 1998 ) ( erratum : phys . lett . * 82 * , 3727 ( 1999 ) ) f. naef , x. wang , x. zotos and w. von der linden , phys . b * 60 * , 359 ( 1999 ) Abstract:
[ "the density matrix renormalization group ( dmrg ) has become a powerful numerical method that can be applied to low - dimensional strongly correlated fermionic and bosonic systems . it allows for a very precise calculation of static , dynamical and thermodynamical properties . its field of applicability has now extended beyond condensed matter , and is successfully used in statistical mechanics and high energy physics as well . in this article , we briefly review the main aspects of the method . we also comment on some of the most relevant applications so as to give an overview on the scope and possibilities of dmrg and mention the most important extensions of the method such as the calculation of dynamical properties , the application to classical systems , inclusion of temperature , phonons and disorder , field theory , time - dependent properties and the _ ab initio _ calculation of electronic states in molecules ." ]
16,171
16,171
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the qcd sum rule ( qcd - sr ) approach to qcd continues to be a highly active field . the influence of the field is reflected in over 1500 references to the seminal paper of shifman , vainshtein and zakharov ( svz ) @xcite , with over 380 of these references following the beginning of 1992 @xcite . while the approach has been applied to a variety of hadronic observables in both vacuum and finite density nuclear matter , a comprehensive review of the systematic errors associated with the approach has not been considered . one of the key assumptions of the approach is the use of the so called `` continuum model '' to remove excited state contaminations from the hadron correlator under investigation . recently , the continuum model for the nucleon was tested by using correlation functions calculated via lattice regularized qcd @xcite . the results suggest that the continuum model adequately removes the excited state contaminations and allows the isolation of the ground state . the success of the continuum model warrants a more careful investigation of other aspects of the qcd - sr approach so that uncertainties in the predictions may be reliably and quantitatively determined . the focus of this paper is to establish a rigorous procedure for extracting quantities of phenomenological interest from qcd sum rules . the main conclusion of this investigation is that qcd sum rules work and they are predictive when the analysis is done rigorously . the ground state masses of the @xmath0-meson and the nucleon are used to introduce the concepts . however , the procedures introduced here are more generally applicable to quantities of current experimental interest . the goal is to shed light on the stability of qcd sum rule analyses and thus the accuracy to which observables may be reliably determined . implementation of the procedure introduced here does not lead to slight adjustments in the extracted parameters , but rather leads to qualitatively different conclusions . it will become apparent that most existing qcd - sr investigations of nucleon properties are in fact unreliable . previous calculations are based on sum rules in which neither the operator product expansion ( ope ) nor the phenomenological description are under acceptable control . the qcd - sr method is presently the best fundamentally based approach for investigating the properties of hadrons in nuclear matter , as the lattice approach is challenged by a number of formidable obstacles @xcite . issues surrounding the finite width of the rho - meson make reliable lattice calculations of @xmath2 mixing very difficult . these are two of the many topics of current interest to nuclear physicists where the best fundamentally based approach is that of qcd - srs . moreover , the approach has minimal model dependence . hence it is imperative to probe the predictive ability of the approach and the ideas presented here are currently being applied to these topics mentioned above @xcite . the most significant source of uncertainty in the qcd sum rule approach is an imprecise knowledge of the vacuum condensates appearing in the operator product expansion ( ope ) . this is particularly problematic for the higher dimension operators , where one usually invokes the vacuum saturation hypothesis ( factorization ) to replace higher - dimension - operator vacuum - expectation values by products of lower - dimension operators . a list of key sources of uncertainty in the qcd - sr approach should include : * the unfactorized condensate values , * factorization of higher dimensional operators , * small but neglected @xmath3 corrections , * the truncation of the operator product expansion ( ope ) , * the selection of the regime for matching the qcd and phenomenological sides of the sum rules , * uncertainties associated with the summation of perturbation theory in large orders , and * the possibility of significant direct instanton contributions . with the exception of direct instanton contributions , the effects of these uncertainties will be estimated via a monte - carlo error analysis . gaussian distributions for the condensate values are generated via monte carlo . these distributions are selected to reflect the spread of values assumed in previously published qcd - sr analyses , and the uncertainties such as operator factorization listed above . these distributions provide a distribution for the ope and thus uncertainty estimates for the ope which will be used in a @xmath4 fit . in turn , the ope distribution provides distributions for the phenomenological fit parameters , thus establishing the predictive ability of the qcd - sr approach . in the field of qcd inspired models , the focus is often on whether or not the model is able to encompass the known experimental data , as opposed to assessing the predictive potential of the method . a review of the qcd - sr literature leaves no doubt as to whether or not the qcd - sr method is able to encompass the established data . the poorly determined condensate values and arbitrary aspect of the matching borel regime provides tremendous freedom in devising ways to achieve the desired result in fact , it is difficult to find qcd - sr - based predictions of hadronic observables which fail to agree with experiment . this is somewhat surprising , since the physics responsible for some observables may be poorly represented in a truncated ope commonly limited to distances of less than 0.3 fm . most qcd - sr calculations of nucleon properties in the literature fall short in the analysis stage where the phenomenological parameters are determined by matching the qcd and phenomenological sides of the sum rules . typical analysis short - comings include : * selecting a single value for the borel parameter which gives `` nice '' results . a borel _ regime _ should be selected in order to evaluate the stability and reliability of the results . * a selection of the borel regime without careful regard to ope convergence nor maintaining ground state dominance of the phenomenological side of the sum rules . * the fixing of search parameters ( such as the continuum threshold ) to preferred values . it will become apparent that this introduces a strong bias to the remaining fit parameters which may not reflect the properties of qcd . * claiming an accuracy for qcd - sr predictions without supporting calculations . occasionally a `` stability analysis '' @xcite is considered , in which fit parameters are monitored as a single condensate value is varied . however , such analyses explore a relatively small corner of the condensate parameter space . in general , former procedures adopted for matching the two sides of the sum rules lack the level of rigor which will be presented here . this general lack of rigor can be traced back to the original paper of svz @xcite . in their conclusions , they comment `` we prefer not to deepen into the debris of computer calculations , sophisticated fit programs , arranging error bars here and there@xmath5 '' while this may be appropriate for a seminal paper on the qcd - sr approach , continuation of this philosophy has lead to strong negative criticism of the qcd - sr field . it is not uncommon to hear remarks such as `` qcd sum rules are useful only if you know the answer . '' or `` you can get anything you want from qcd sum rules . '' and `` 10% here , 10% there pretty soon you re talking about real numbers ! '' these remarks are unfortunate , as a rigorous and proficuous analysis is possible . in this paper , a method for the quantitative determination of phenomenological quantities with uncertainties will be presented . since this paper is directed to both qcd - sum - rule practitioners and skeptics alike , we begin by briefly outlining the qcd - sr approach in section [ qcdsr ] . a more pedagogical review of the approach may be found in the recent review article of ref . this section also introduces the `` ioffe formula '' @xcite , argued by many to qualitatively encapsulate a description of the nucleon mass in terms of the chiral symmetry breaking order parameter @xmath1 . uncertainties associated with the evaluation of the ope will be addressed via a new monte - carlo based procedure . estimates for these uncertainties are presented in section [ uncert ] . section [ analysis ] details the monte - carlo uncertainty analysis and discusses the optimization algorithm and cautious convergence criteria used in the following . section [ rho ] presents an analysis of @xmath0-meson sum rules . here the criteria for the selection of the regime for matching the qcd and phenomenological sides of the sum rules is reviewed . reasonable alternatives are considered via monte carlo . these considerations lead to the selection of the optimal interpolating field for nucleon sum rules . new insights into unconventional nucleon interpolators obtained from the lattice qcd investigation of ref . @xcite play a significant role here . section [ nucleon11 ] reviews the selection of the optimal nucleon interpolating field for correlators obtained from spin-1/2 interpolating fields . the effects of choosing non - optimal interpolators is demonstrated . section [ nucleon13 ] explores additional sum rules obtained from the overlap of the generalized spin-1/2 and a spin-3/2 interpolator . in section [ correl ] we explore the correlations between condensate values , fit parameters and sum rule consistency . these correlations serve to identify the roles of the leading terms of the ope in hadronic physics . the validity of the `` ioffe formula '' is evaluated here , and these results may be of interest to those modeling the qcd vacuum . the contingency table analysis reveals that the intimate relationship between the quark condensate and the nucleon mass suggested in the `` ioffe formula '' is invalid . the necessity of direct instanton contributions to the qcd sum rules is determined in section [ instantons ] . we demonstrate that there is no evidence indicating that direct instanton contributions are required to maintain sum rule consistency . the implications of the results of this analysis on coordinate space correlators are discussed in section [ coordimpl ] . finally , section [ conclusions ] summarizes the findings of this in - depth investigation . the underlying principle of field theoretic approaches to hadron phenomenology is the ansatz of duality . that is , it is possible to simultaneously describe a hadron as quarks propagating in the qcd vacuum , and as a phenomenological field with the appropriate quantum numbers . hadron masses are extracted from an analysis of the two - point function @xmath6 the interpolating field @xmath7 is typically constructed from quark field operators combined to give the quantum numbers of the hadron under investigation . the @xmath0-meson interpolator related to the decay constant is @xmath8 to maintain maximal overlap with the ground state relative to excited states , only interpolators without derivatives are considered . for the nucleon we begin by considering the most general spin-1/2 nucleon interpolator @xmath9 where @xmath10 and @xmath11 @xmath12 is the interpolator typically used in lattice qcd analyses . @xmath13 vanishes in the nonrelativistic limit . however in a theory with light relativistic current quarks , there is no reason to exclude such an interpolating field _ a priori _ @xcite . with the use of the fierz relations , the combination of the above two interpolating fields for @xmath14 may be written @xmath15 [ chisr ] giving the proton interpolating field advocated by ioffe @xcite and often found in qcd - sr calculations . at the phenomenological level one proceeds by inserting a complete set of eigenstates with the quantum numbers of the interpolator . the ability of the interpolator to annihilate a positive parity baryon to the qcd vacuum is described by the parameter @xmath16 in @xmath17 for state @xmath18 of momentum @xmath19 and spin @xmath20 . @xmath21 is a dirac spinor . negative parity states require a @xmath22 on the right - hand side of ( [ lambdadef ] ) . for the nucleon , the two point function has the form @xmath23 where @xmath24 corresponds to positive / negative parity baryons . while there is some suppression of excited state contributions to the two - point function , there is little hope of isolating ground state properties from such a function . hence one uses the celebrated borel transform @xmath25 = \lim_{{\scriptstyle -p^2 \to \infty \atop \scriptstyle n \to \infty } \atop \scriptstyle -p^2/n = m^2 } { 1\over n ! } ( -p^2)^{n+1 } \left ( { d \over d p^2 } \right ) ^n f ( p^2 ) \ , , \ ] ] at each dirac-@xmath26 structure to obtain exponential suppression of excited states . the parameter @xmath27 is commonly referred to as the borel mass . the borel transform is easily applied to a dispersion relation for @xmath28 at each dirac-@xmath26 structure @xmath29 and the polynomial subtraction terms are eliminated by the borel transform . at the structure @xmath30 one has @xmath31 where we have introduced the spectral density @xmath32 , @xmath33[gp ] at the structure @xmath34 @xmath35 where @xmath36 here , @xmath37 and @xmath38 account for excited state contributions , and @xmath24 in ( [ rho1 ] ) corresponds to positive / negative parity states . for the vector meson one has @xmath39 @xmath40 [ rhov ] at the structure @xmath41 . at the quark level , one exploits the operator product expansion ( ope ) to describe the short distance behavior of the two - point function @xmath42 [ ope ] where @xmath43 is the normalization point at which the coefficient functions and the operators are defined . here we have explicitly included all operators up to dimension eight , to leading order in the quark mass @xmath44 , having the quantum numbers of the vacuum . the first digit of the subscript of the wilson coefficients @xmath45 gives the energy dimension of the operator . @xmath46 may take any of the 16 independent dirac-@xmath26 matrices . upon fourier transforming to momentum space , ( [ ope ] ) becomes an expansion in @xmath47 , valid for large momentum transfers . thus one may use perturbation theory to calculate the wilson coefficients . the contribution of the gluon operator term 4.1 in the expansion for the proton is suppressed due a factor of @xmath48 which appears in the denominator of the wilson coefficient arising from integration over the quark - loop momentum which introduces the factor @xmath49 . terms involving more than two gluon field strength tensors @xmath50 and products of @xmath44 and @xmath51 are estimated to be small and are typically neglected . the standard treatment of the ope proceeds via inserting the explicit forms of the interpolating fields into the two - point function of ( [ twopt ] ) and contracting out pairs of time - ordered quark - field operators which are the fully interacting quark propagators of qcd . wick s theorem for the time - ordered product of two fermion fields provides @xmath52 taylor expansion of the normal ordered piece leads to @xmath53 the well known trick is to select the coordinate gauge @xmath54 such that @xmath55 and the partial derivatives of ( [ taylor ] ) may be replaced by covariant derivatives @xmath56 generally , one works with ( [ aexp ] ) to leading order . the following relations allow an easy determination of the covariant derivatives @xmath57 @xmath58 = i g_c g^{\mu \nu } \ , , \ ] ] @xmath59 in summary , the quark correlators employed in calculating the ope under the usual assumption of vacuum saturation of the intermediate states of composite operators include @xmath60 \bigl ( g_c g_{\alpha \beta}^n \bigr ) \sigma^{\alpha \beta } { \lambda^n_{ab } \over 2 } \ , . \label{quarkcorr } \\ & & \nonumber \\ \lefteqn{\langle \omega \bigm | t \left \ { q^a ( x ) \ , g_c g_{\alpha \beta}^n \ , \overline q^b ( 0 ) \right \ } \bigm | \omega \rangle = } \hspace{36pt } \nonumber \\ & & - { 1 \over 2 ^ 6 \ , 3 } \langle \overline q g_c \sigma \cdot g q \rangle \sigma_{\alpha \beta } { \lambda^n_{ab } \over 2 } \nonumber \\ & & + { i \over 2 ^ 8 \ , 3 } m_q \langle \overline q g_c \sigma \cdot g q \rangle \bigl ( \gamma \cdot x \ , \sigma_{\alpha \beta } + \sigma_{\alpha \beta } \ , \gamma \cdot x \bigr ) { \lambda^n_{ab } \over 2 } \nonumber \\ & & + { x^2 \over 2^{10 } \ , 3 ^ 2 } \langle g_c^2 g^2 \rangle \langle \overline q q \rangle \sigma_{\alpha \beta } { \lambda^n_{ab } \over 2 } \ , . \label{quarkgluoncorr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally the momentum space correlator is borel transformed . here one encounters the factorial suppression of higher - dimension operators as indicated in @xmath61 = ( -1)^k \ , { 1 \over ( k-1 ) ! } \ , { 1 \over ( m^2)^{k-1 } } \ , .\ ] ] it is worth noting that the factorial suppression does not really set in until one reaches the term @xmath62 . for the @xmath0 meson this term corresponds to an operator of dimension eight , and for the nucleon the dimensions are twelve and thirteen for the two nucleon sum rules obtained from spin-1/2 interpolating fields . since the ope for the @xmath0-meson is traditionally truncated at dimension eight @xcite , the correlator should be more reliable than for the nucleon sum rules which are truncated at dimension nine . it is well known that the standard treatment of the ope encounters difficulties at large orders in the perturbative expansion of the wilson coefficients . perturbative expansions are divergent at large orders and are asymptotic at best @xcite . in the standard treatment , these divergences limit the accuracy to which the perturbative coefficients may be determined . renormalons @xcite , a particular set of perturbative graphs , provide a simple illustration of the factorial growth in the contributions of perturbative graphs at large orders @xcite . the factorial growth in large - order contributions associated with soft infrared ( ir ) virtual momenta is problematic , as the series is not borel summable . as such , the wilson coefficients , by themselves , are ill defined in the standard treatment . the uncertainty resulting from the restriction to finite orders of the asymptotic expansion is commonly referred to as the ir renormalon ambiguity . of course the use of perturbative propagators to describe soft virtual momenta is incorrect . instead , one must utilize fully dressed nonperturbative propagators . hence , it is not surprising one encounters difficulties in the ir regime , as one is simply encountering the landau pole of the perturbative coupling constant . a solution to the ir renormalon ambiguity problem was provided by the itep group @xcite through the introduction of the normalization / separation scale @xmath43 of ( [ opemu ] ) . the ope becomes a separation of scales , with virtual momenta lying above @xmath43 represented in the wilson coefficients , and momenta below @xmath43 in the vacuum expectation values ( vevs ) of higher - dimension operators beginning at dimension four . the introduction of the scale @xmath43 eliminates the ir renormalon ambiguity of the perturbative expansion . however , in principle , both the wilson coefficients and the vevs of operators contain perturbative as well as nonperturbative physics . in principle , the ope defined in ( [ opemu ] ) is free of ir renormalon ambiguities . however , in practice it is difficult to implement the formal procedure of truncating virtual momenta below @xmath43 when calculating higher order @xmath3 corrections to the wilson coefficients . while these contributions are small for leading order corrections , their inclusion is a source of error which can be accommodated in the monte - carlo uncertainty analysis . in the ultraviolet ( uv ) virtual momenta regime , the renormalon series is sign alternating and borel summable . summation of the uv series can give rise to a power correction proportional to @xmath63 which closely resembles the squared quark mass contribution to the ope @xcite . for the vector correlator , the uv renormalon gives rise to an effective mass of roughly @xmath64 , which is much larger than the usual current quark mass the order of 5 mev @xcite . hence there is some concern that important power corrections associated with uv renormalons has been overlooked in the standard qcd - sr treatment . moreover , it is the power corrections that provide the link to nonperturbative phenomena . to the extent that the power correction is scheme dependent and not reliably known , we will refer to these quark - mass like power corrections as uv renormalon uncertainties . additional evidence for @xmath65-type power corrections independent of renormalons has been obtained through a consideration of constraints imposed by asymptotic freedom and analyticity on the large - order behavior of perturbation theory @xcite . in this case the perturbative series is not borel summable . given the absence of a local gauge - invariant field - operator product of dimension two , some might argue that the coefficient of the singularity in the borel plane governing the large - order behavior of perturbative series must have a zero . however , perturbative estimates of the coefficient do not provide evidence of such a zero @xcite and the issue is unsettled . hence the issue of possible dimension - two power corrections is of current interest . the techniques presented in this manuscript might be used to provide some phenomenological insight into the debate . however , such considerations would take us too far afield and will be deferred to a subsequent analysis @xcite . on the other hand , it is interesting to look for discrepancies which might be rooted in such power corrections , and this is done in the following analysis . to summarize the points of this section , we present the traditional qcd sum rules for the nucleon @xcite obtained from the consideration of the interpolating field @xmath66 of ( [ chisr ] ) to operator dimension 8 . @xmath67 [ tradit ] the dots allow for excited state contributions . ) has had an elusive history . early calculations @xcite appear to have calculated a subset of the diagrams contributing to the dimension 7 operator @xcite . however a more persistent error lies in a factor of 3 correction in the term @xmath68 \left < \overline q q \right > \left < g_c^2 g^2 \right > \sigma_{\alpha \beta } \lambda_{ab}^n/2 $ ] of ( [ quarkgluoncorr ] ) from that used in previous analyses . ] the ioffe formula for the nucleon mass is obtained from ( [ tradit ] ) by keeping the leading terms of the opes and assuming dominance of the ground state on the right - hand side of the equations , @xmath69 [ bigassumption ] the ioffe formula follows from the ratio of these two equations , @xmath70 if one prefers to eliminate the borel mass by selecting @xmath71 , @xmath72 here the quark condensate is estimated from the partially conserved axial current ( pcac ) relation and pion decay to give @xmath73 which corresponds to @xmath74 gev , @xmath75 gev and the average light quark mass is 7 mev . the qualitative features of chiral symmetry breaking coupled with the quantitative success of these relations has lead to enormous faith being placed into the validity of the ioffe formula . most practitioners expect this relation to be valid , at least in a qualitative manner of proportionality . the operator product expansion provides knowledge of the two - point function ( [ twopt ] ) in the near perturbative regime . as such the correlator represents contributions from both the ground state hadron and excited states . to maintain some predictive ability in the qcd - sr approach , a `` continuum model '' for excited state contributions to the correlator is introduced guided by the principle of duality , the leading terms of the ope surviving in the limit @xmath76 are used to model the form of the spectral density accounting for excited state contributions . consider , as an example , the identity operator for the nucleon interpolator @xmath77 of ( [ chisr ] ) . explicitly including the excited state term of ( [ gp ] ) in equation ( [ ioffe1a ] ) leads to @xmath78 for large borel mass . the laplace transform readily provides @xmath79 the continuum model contribution is obtained by introducing a threshold , @xmath80 , at which strength in the excited states becomes significant . such a model is motivated well by the experimental cross section for @xmath81 hadrons . in addition , this approach accommodates the finite widths and the multi - particle continuum of qcd . hence the excited state contributions associated with the identity operator are @xmath82 continuum model contributions associated with @xmath83 and @xmath84 terms are calculated in a similar manner . usually the continuum contributions are placed on the ope side of the sum rules . hence , terms surviving in the limit @xmath76 have the following factors associated with them : @xmath85 \ , , \\ m^4 \ , : & & \left [ 1 - e^{-w^2/m^2 } \ , \left ( { w^2 \over m^2 } + 1 \right ) \right ] \ , , \\ m^2 \ , : & & \left [ 1 - e^{-w^2/m^2 } \right ] \ , .\end{aligned}\ ] ] [ continuum ] the contributions of this model relative to the ground state , whose properties one is really trying to determine , are not small . they are typically 10 to 50% @xcite . the validity of this somewhat crude model is relied upon to cleanly remove the excited state contaminations . in the lattice qcd investigation of the continuum model formulated in euclidean space @xcite , the short time regime of point - to - point lattice correlation functions is described well by the qcd - sum - rule - inspired continuum model . there , the laplace transform of the spectral density appears to be sufficient to render any structure in the spectral density insignificant in the short euclidean time regime of point - to - point correlators . similar conclusions are expected to hold for the borel transformed sum rules under investigation here . it should be noted that the spectral density of the physical world is different than that encountered on the lattice . for example , in the nucleon channel one expects strength in the correlator above the ground state to start at the @xmath86 threshold @xcite , whereas in the lattice calculations such contributions are altered by the heavier quark mass and the quenched approximation . while the lattice results are encouraging , one may find that in some cases the continuum model is not sufficiently detailed when the continuum model contributions are large . an example of this will be presented in the discussion surrounding the @xmath0-meson sum rules , where discrepancies may be due to an over simplified continuum model . the origin of the uncertainty estimate for the ope lies in the uncertainties assigned to the qcd parameters appearing in the truncated ope . in this section we assess the uncertainties on these qcd parameters . in assigning these uncertainties one would like to select values conservatively enough such that the qcd - sr approach can test the validity of our present understanding of qcd . qcd - sr predictions that fail to agree with experiment at the @xmath87 level should indicate a possibly interesting discrepancy . at the same time one would also like to select uncertainties in accord with the generally accepted values in the literature . in addition , the error assessments need to reflect uncertainties associated with the factorization of higher dimensional operators and small but never - the - less neglected @xmath3 corrections . these considerations have been balanced in the following . while some may argue that some values are known better than that indicated here , others will no doubt argue that the errors are underestimated . in any event , one will learn for the first time how the uncertainties in the qcd parameters are mapped into uncertainties in the phenomenological fit parameters . in the lattice qcd investigation of ref . @xcite it was noted that interplay between the pole position and continuum threshold lead to rather large uncertainties in the fit parameters . it will be interesting to see how reasonable estimates of the qcd uncertainties are revealed in the fit parameters . for the quark condensate , @xmath88 we note that there are two values commonly found in qcd - sr analyses . pcac and pion decay considerations coupled with quark masses of @xmath89 mev lead to a value of @xmath90 gev@xmath91 . qcd - sr considerations of @xmath92 and octet baryon magnetic moments @xcite prefer a smaller magnitude at @xmath93 gev@xmath91 . expecting the value to lie some where in this regime , we take the average of these values with an uncertainty of half the difference at an 80% confidence level . introducing the standard qcd - sr notation we define @xmath94 this value and uncertainty is also in accord with @xmath95 obtained from more recent quark mass estimates @xcite . early estimates of the gluon condensate @xmath96 from charmonium sum rules @xcite place the value at @xmath97 gev@xmath98 , which is generally referred to as the `` standard value '' @xmath99 however , a number of more recent investigations place the gluon condensate at much larger values @xcite . for example , a finite - energy sum rule ( fesr ) analysis of the @xmath0-meson channel places the gluon condensate at 2 to 5 times the standard value @xcite . in this analysis the spectral density is taken from a fit of the isospin - one channel of @xmath100 scattering data . first results from the aleph and cleo ii experiments @xcite also suggest a larger value at @xmath101 gev@xmath98 . a recent laplace based sum rule analyses @xcite suggests a value of @xmath102 gev@xmath98 , more in accord with the standard value . however , we are somewhat skeptical of the refinements of this result as the analysis is based on an approach which is criticized in the following . the most reliable sum rules of sec . [ nucleon13 ] also prefer a larger gluon condensate in order to maintain consistency between the sum rules . there it is found that the nucleon mass may be reproduced with a value of @xmath103 gev@xmath98 which agrees with experimental estimate . since the gluon condensate plays a critical role in the nucleon sum rules as part of a factorized dimension seven operator we adopt an uncertainty of 50% and take @xmath104 the mixed condensate is parameterized as @xmath105 . early analyses of baryons @xcite as well as more recent analyses of heavy - light quark systems @xcite place @xmath106 gev@xmath107 , while an analysis of @xmath108 qcd - sr sum rules demand @xmath109 to be smaller @xcite at @xmath110 gev@xmath107 . hence we take the average and half the difference as the uncertainty . @xmath111 since the parameter @xmath109 is selected via monte carlo , the value of the mixed condensate is obtained by multiplying @xmath109 by the central value of the quark condensate , as opposed to a randomly selected value of the quark condensate . this is in contrast to factorized operators where both condensates appearing in the operator are selected via monte carlo . relatively little is known about the magnitude of the dimension - six , four - quark operators . early arguments placed the values of these condensates within 10% of the factorized values @xcite . however other analyses claimed significant violation of factorization @xcite for these operators in both nucleon and vector meson sum rules . parameterizing the four quark - operators as @xmath112 , estimates of factorization violation place @xmath113 or more . for the nucleon we consider @xmath114 if one adopts the standard value for the gluon condensate , then @xmath115 is sufficient to reproduce the @xmath0-meson mass . however , selection of the more recent and reliable estimates of @xmath116 demands @xmath117 to reproduce the @xmath0-meson mass . this value is in accord with the observations of refs . @xcite , however the uncertainty on this parameter is large . hence we adopt as opposed to 2 , even a small suppression of the chirally even four - quark condensate at finite density can give rise to substantial suppression of the @xmath0-meson mass and width . further investigation of these issues is warranted . ] @xmath118 figure [ distrib ] displays histograms drawn from 1000 qcd parameter sets for four of the qcd parameters discussed to this point . = variation of the qcd scale parameter @xmath119 has little effect on the results . however , we restrict the values to the conventional range adopted in qcd - srs @xmath120 variation of @xmath119 above 200 mev is only sensible if the separation scale @xmath43 of the ope , taken to be 500 mev , is increased to maintain plausible convergence of the power corrections of the ope . a change in @xmath43 redefines the condensate values . a systematic determination of the new condensate values is beyond the scope of this investigation and we choose to simply restrict the value as above . it is perhaps interesting to note that if @xmath119 is very large , say near the upper limit of the current world average @xcite , the ope separation scale would necessarily become large . consequently , the borel mass would be restricted to larger values , and access to ground state properties may not be possible . the correlator may be dominated by strength from excited states , similar to the present situation for the pseudoscalar pion correlator . fortunately , the lower bound on the current world average for @xmath121 bodes well for present qcd sum rule analyses . however , if the current world average for @xmath119 persists , a comprehensive reformulation of the approach should be pursued . the @xmath0-meson sum rule requires knowledge of @xmath122 at the scale of 1 gev@xmath107 . since this scale is rather low for two - loop perturbation theory , we adopt a 10% uncertainty @xmath123 finally , the @xmath0-meson sum rule requires knowledge of the average light quark mass @xmath44 . since it appears multiplied by the quark condensate , we will use the relation of ( [ gor ] ) and equate @xmath124 monte - carlo techniques might also be used to probe ope truncation errors by randomly selecting the size of the next term to follow the truncated series . the problem lies in determining a sensible and realistic estimate without actually calculating the term . instead , we will emphasize the importance of ope convergence and select the borel analysis regime such that truncated terms are very unlikely to be important . gaussian distributions are generated using established algorithms for the conversion of uniform distributions on the interval ( 0,1 ) @xcite . a particularly fast algorithm used in this investigation is as follows . if @xmath125 and @xmath126 are uniform on ( 0,1 ) , then construct @xmath127 and @xmath128 . calculate @xmath129 . if @xmath130 start over . otherwise , calculate @xmath131 @xmath132 and @xmath133 are independent and normally distributed with mean 0 and variance 1 . a set of gaussianly - distributed randomly - selected condensate values is generated , from which an ope in borel space , @xmath134 , is constructed . by repeating this procedure , an uncertainty for the ope may be determined . selecting @xmath135 evenly distributed points in the borel parameter space @xmath136 , the standard deviation in the ope at the @xmath137th borel mass is given by @xmath138 ^ 2 \ , , \label{sigmaope}\ ] ] where @xmath18 denotes the @xmath18th set of @xmath139 qcd parameter sets and @xmath140 in practice , @xmath141 was used in estimating the ope uncertainty . however , @xmath142 was sufficient to get a stable uncertainty estimate . the uncertainties in the ope are not uniform throughout the borel regime . they are larger at the lower nonperturbative end of the borel region where uncertainties in the higher - dimensional vacuum condensates dominate . hence , it is crucial that the appropriate weight is used in the calculation of @xmath4 . having determined the ope uncertainty , a @xmath4 measure is easily constructed . for the ope obtained from the @xmath143th set of qcd parameters , the @xmath4 per degree of freedom is @xmath144 ^ 2 \over \sigma_{{\rm ope}}^2(m_j ) } \ , , \label{chisq}\ ] ] where @xmath145 is the number of phenomenological search parameters , and @xmath146 denotes the phenomenological spectral representation of the qcd - sr . in practice , @xmath147 points were used along the borel axis . @xmath4 is minimized by adjusting the phenomenological parameters including the pole residue @xmath148 , the hadron mass @xmath149 , and the continuum threshold @xmath150 . distributions for the phenomenological parameters are obtained by minimizing @xmath4 for many qcd parameter sets . provided the resulting distributions are gaussian , an estimate of the uncertainty in the phenomenological results such as the hadron mass is obtained from @xmath151 in the event that the resultant distribution is not gaussian , we will report the median and asymmetric standard deviations from the median . we note that ( [ sigmam ] ) is the standard deviation of the distribution and not the standard error obtained by further dividing by @xmath152 , the number of qcd parameter sets in the sample . the standard deviation is roughly independent of the number of qcd parameter sets used in the analysis , and directly reflects the input parameter uncertainties . in the following , we generally select @xmath153 . while 100 qcd parameter configurations are sufficient for obtaining reliable uncertainty estimates , we also wish to explore correlations among the qcd parameters and the phenomenological fit parameters . the extra sets aid in resolving more subtle correlations . some care must be taken in the interpretation of the @xmath154 . while we are free to choose any number of points @xmath135 along the borel axis for fitting the two sides of the sum rule , it is important to recognize that the actual number of degrees of freedom is determined by the number of terms in the ope . for the @xmath154 to have true statistical meaning , a correlated @xmath4 calculation is required . @xmath155 \times \nonumber \\ & & \quad c_{j\,j'}^{-1 } \left [ \pi^{\rm ope}_k(m_{j ' } ) - \pi^{\rm sr}(m_{j ' } ; \lambda_k , m_k , w_k ) \right ] \ , , \label{corrchisq}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath156 is the inverse covariance matrix . the covariance matrix may be estimated by @xmath157 \left [ \pi^{\rm ope}_i(m_{j ' } ) - \overline{\pi^{\rm ope}}(m_{j ' } ) \right ] \label{covar}\ ] ] unfortunately , for most of the fits considered here the covariance matrix is ill - conditioned . inverting the covariance matrix via singular value decomposition leads to well known pathological problems @xcite such as best fit lines which do not pass through the data points etc . while one could experiment with different approaches to stepping around this problem , we prefer to use the robust method of determining best fit parameters by minimizing the uncorrelated @xmath4 of ( [ chisq ] ) . even if some correlation among the data is suspected , it is still acceptable to use the uncorrelated @xmath4 fit provided the errors on the parameters are estimated using a monte - carlo based procedure like that discussed here rather than from the dependence of @xmath4 on the parameters @xcite . when simultaneously fitting multiple sum rules which may have some fit parameters in common , ( [ chisq ] ) is simply modified to @xmath158 ^ 2 \over \sigma_{{\rm ope}}^2{}_i(m_{ij } ) } \ , , \label{chisqmulti}\ ] ] where @xmath18 runs over the considered sum rules . ( in this example , @xmath149 is a common parameter to all @xmath159 sum rules . ) the subscript @xmath18 in @xmath160 indicates that each sum rule has a unique set of @xmath135 borel masses @xmath161 spanning the region of interest in borel space . the subscript @xmath143 in ( [ chisq ] ) , denoting a particular set of qcd parameters , has been suppressed . in the following discussion it will become apparent that it is advantageous to weight the contributions in the sum over the various sum rules by the size of their valid borel regimes . if @xmath162 is the size of the valid borel regime for the @xmath18th sum rule , then ( [ chisqmulti ] ) is modified to @xmath163 ^ 2 \over \sigma_{{\rm ope}}^2{}_i(m_{ij } ) } \ , . \label{chisqweight}\ ] ] the optimization method utilized in this investigation is an updated version of a direction - set routine by powell originally published in ref . this algorithm finds the minimum value of a function by iterative variation of the function parameters which need not be independent . modifications of the original routine improve the selection of conjugate directions in the search and avoid the possible generation of linearly dependent search directions @xcite . powell s method is among the best methods for finding minima in a multidimensional parameter space when derivatives are not readily available @xcite . part of the reason for the robust nature of powell s routine is the cautious criterion for ultimate convergence . once a minimum is found , the optimal vector , @xmath164 , in the parameter space is displaced by ten times the requested accuracy . the search proceeds from this new point until a minimum is found at vector @xmath165 . the minimum on the line joining @xmath164 and @xmath165 is found at @xmath166 . convergence is reached if the components of the vectors @xmath167 and @xmath168 are all less than 10% of the required accuracy . otherwise the direction @xmath167 is utilized in a new search . the displacement of the first minimum by ten times the requested accuracy plays a crucial role in removing the sensitivity of the ultimate minimum from the initial parameter estimates . while there is sufficient flexibility in the algorithm parameters to search in the locality of the initial parameter estimates , the opposite criteria has been utilized in this investigation . one of the main goals of this investigation is to eliminate the possibility of fine tuning the initial parameter estimates which otherwise can bias the results . instead , we are interested in the predictions of the qcd sum rules . the fundamental qcd - sr for the @xmath0 meson follows from the consideration of ( [ twopt ] ) , ( [ chirho ] ) , ( [ rhov ] ) and ( [ continuum ] ) . we consider the correlator , @xmath169 , where the continuum model is subtracted from the phenomenological side and placed on the ope side . @xmath170 + c_1 + { c_2\over m^2 } + { c_3\over 2!\ , m^4 } + \cdots \nonumber \\ & & + { c_m \over ( m-1 ) ! \ , ( m^2)^{m-1 } } + \cdots \ , . \label{rhosr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the wilson coefficients are given by @xcite @xmath171 the phenomenology of the qcd - sr is described by the vector - meson pole of interest plus the continuum model accounting for the contributions of all excited states . by working in a region where the pole dominates the phenomenology , one can minimize sensitivity to the model and have assurance that it is the spectral parameters of the ground state of interest that are being determined by matching the sum rules . in practice , these considerations effectively set an upper limit in the borel parameter space , beyond which the model for excited states dominates the phenomenological side . at the same time , the truncated ope must be sufficiently convergent as to accurately describe the true ope . since the ope is an expansion in the inverse squared borel mass , this consideration sets a lower limit in borel parameter space , beyond which higher order terms not present in the truncated ope are significant and important . monitoring ope convergence is absolutely crucial to recovering nonperturbative phenomena in the sum - rule approach , as it is the lower end of the borel region where the nonperturbative information of the ope is most significant . as we shall see , this information must also be accurate . in short , one should not expect to extract information on the ground state spectral properties unless the ground state dominates the contributions on the phenomenological side and the ope is sufficiently convergent . in this investigation , we will analyze each individual sum rule with regard to the above criteria . a sum rule with an upper limit in borel space lower than the lower limit is considered invalid . as a measure of the relative reliability of various sum rules we consider the size of the regime in borel space where both sides of the sum rules are valid . this quantity is used as a weight in the calculation of the @xmath154 as indicated in ( [ chisqweight ] ) . in addition , the size of continuum contributions throughout the borel region can also serve as a measure of reliability , with small continuum model contributions being more reliable . the fiducial borel region is chosen @xcite such that the highest - dimensional operator(s ) ( hdo ) contribute no more than @xmath172 to the qcd side while the continuum contribution is less than @xmath173 of the total phenomenological side ( i.e. , the sum of the pole and the continuum contribution ) . the former sets a criterion for the convergence of the ope while the latter controls the continuum contribution . while the selection of @xmath174 is obvious for pole dominance , the selection of @xmath175 is a reasonably conservative criterion that has not failed in practice . and @xmath174 criteria are automatically explored in the monte - carlo error analysis , as the condensate values and the continuum threshold change in each sample . ] see ref . @xcite for further specific examples . figure [ sr1hdo ] displays the valid borel window for the @xmath0-meson sum rule of ( [ rhosr ] ) . the hdo contributions limited to @xmath175 of the ope and the continuum model contributions limited to 50% of the phenomenology are illustrated . the continuum contributions are the order of @xmath176 of the phenomenological contributions at the lower end of the borel regime . here , the pole of interest truly dominates the qcd - sr . figure [ sr1fit ] displays the corresponding fit obtained by minimizing @xmath4 in a three parameter search including @xmath177 , @xmath178 and @xmath179 . figure [ binrhomass ] displays the distribution of @xmath0-meson masses obtained from the 1000 sum rule fits . the distribution corresponds to @xmath180 the uncertainty is somewhat larger than the commonly assumed 10% . figure [ binrhof ] displays the distribution of the square of @xmath177 which corresponds to @xmath181 which agrees with the experimental value of @xmath182 gev . the continuum threshold is @xmath183 gev which compares favorably with @xmath184 gev ( the @xmath185 mass less the half width ) , given the approximate nature of the continuum model . = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = in addition to the fundamental sum rule of ( [ rhosr ] ) one also finds the use of sum rules obtained by differentiating ( [ rhosr ] ) with respect to @xmath186 . for the @xmath187th derivative @xmath188 \ , \label{derivsr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] while these sum rules are obviously unnecessary for the extraction of @xmath0-meson properties , the hope is that these additional sum rules will provide new useful information that might be used to further constrain the phenomenological properties . it is possible to isolate the @xmath0-meson mass as a function of the borel mass , by taking a ratio of the first derivative sum rule with the fundamental sum rule . this approach has some aesthetic appeal , and has widely become the method of choice for analyzing qcd - srs . the continuum threshold is selected to make the ratio of the two sum rules as flat as possible as a function of borel mass . finally , the @xmath0-meson mass is selected from the point at which the ratio is most flat or stable . unfortunately , this method has some very unpleasant shortcomings . the ratio method does not check the validity of each individual sum rule . it is possible to have individual sum rules that are not valid while their ratio is flat as function of borel mass . in addition , the ratio method can not account for the fact that sum rules do not work equally well . the borel region where a sum rule is valid can vary from one sum rule to another . moreover , large uncertainties in one sum rule can spoil the predictions of another sum rule . finally , the continuum contributions to the sum rules are not monitored in the ratio method . if the continuum contribution is dominant in a sum rule , one should not expect to get reliable information about the lowest resonance . the fact that sum rules do not work equally well deserves further discussion . in ref . @xcite a detailed comparison of fundamental and derivative sum rules is carried out for the @xmath0 meson . these arguments are not broadly known and are generally applicable to any derivative borel - improved qcd - sr . hence the important observations are highlighted here . if one could carry out the ope to arbitrary accuracy and use a spectral density independent of models for excited state contributions , the predictions based on ( [ rhosr ] ) and those based on the derivative sum rules of ( [ derivsr ] ) should be the same . in practical calculations , however , one has to truncate the ope and use a simple phenomenological ansatz for the spectral density . thus it is unrealistic to expect the sum rules to work equally well . compare the @xmath187th derivative sum rule of ( [ derivsr ] ) with the direct sum rule of ( [ rhosr ] ) . 1 . the perturbative contribution in the derivative sum rule has an extra factor @xmath189 relative to the corresponding term in ( [ rhosr ] ) , implying that the perturbative contribution is more important in the derivative sum rules than in the fundamental sum rule , and becomes increasingly important as @xmath187 increases . since the perturbative term mainly contributes to the continuum of the spectral density , maintaining dominance of the lowest resonance pole in the sum rule will become increasingly difficult as @xmath187 increases . 2 . in ( [ rhosr ] ) , the term proportional to @xmath190 is suppressed by a factor of @xmath191 , while it is only suppressed by @xmath192 in the derivative sum rule ( @xmath193 ) . this implies that the convergence of the ope is much slower in the derivative sum rule than in the fundamental sum rule . consequently , the poorly known high - order power corrections are more important in the derivative sum rule than in eq . ( [ rhosr ] ) , and become more and more important as @xmath187 increases . if one would like to restrict the size of the last term of the ope to maintain some promise of ope convergence , the size of the borel region in which the sum rules are believed to be valid is restricted . 3 . the power corrections proportional to @xmath194 do _ not _ contribute to the @xmath195 derivative sum rule but do contribute to ( [ rhosr ] ) . if one truncates the ope , part or all of the nonperturbative information will be lost in the derivative sum rules . it is also worth noting that the leading power corrections are the most desirable terms to have . they do not give rise to a term in the continuum model and they are not the last term in the ope , whose relative contribution should be restricted to maintain ope convergence . in practice , the predictions based on the fundamental sum rule of ( [ rhosr ] ) are more reliable than those from the derivative sum rules , which become less and less reliable as @xmath187 increases . this can also be demonstrated by analyzing the sum rules numerically . figure [ sr12hdo ] displays the valid borel windows for a simultaneous fit of the @xmath0-meson sum rules of ( [ rhosr ] ) and the first derivative @xmath196 of ( [ derivsr ] ) . the reliability of the fundamental sum rule over the derivative sum rule is obvious . the valid borel regime for the derivative sum rule is nearly nonexistent . all three points of the discussion surrounding derivative sum rules are displayed in this figure . item 1 indicates the continuum model contributions will be much larger in the derivative sum rule for a given borel mass . indeed the continuum model contribution never drops below 45% in the valid regime . the relative contribution of the last term in the truncated ope is larger in the derivative sum rule for a given borel mass , in agreement with the expectations of items 2 and 3 . figure [ sr12fit ] displays the corresponding fit obtained by minimizing the weighted @xmath154 of ( [ chisqweight ] ) in a three parameter search including @xmath177 , @xmath178 and @xmath179 . this time the logarithms of the left- and right - hand sides of equations ( [ rhosr ] ) and ( [ derivsr ] ) are plotted as a function of the inverse squared borel mass . this method has the advantage of revealing the possible breakdown of the ope signified by deviations of the dashed curves from linearity . uncertainties are displayed only at the ends of the borel region for clarity . = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = while the central values of the best fit parameters @xmath197 gev , @xmath198 gev@xmath107 , and @xmath199 gev , remain essentially unchanged , the reduction of the uncertainties comes from rather unreliable information as discussed above . these arguments are further supported by the failure of the two sides of ( [ derivsr ] ) for @xmath200 to agree as illustrated in figure [ sr12fit ] . to further probe the reasons for this failure , the analysis of these sum rules is repeated with a spectral representation that accounts for the finite width of the @xmath0 meson . to account for the finite width of the @xmath0-meson , the @xmath201 function in ( [ rhov ] ) is replaced by a normalized breit - wigner form @xmath202 and the integral over the @xmath0-meson ground state @xmath203 is handled numerically @xcite . using the experimental width of 151.5 mev , a three parameter fit of the fundamental and derivative sum rules with the breit - wigner form leads to essentially the same results reported in figure [ sr12fit ] . the mass , coupling , and continuum threshold all agree within uncertainties , and have similar uncertainties . hence , these spectral properties may be reliably estimated without precise information on the @xmath0 width . however , @xmath2 mixing provides an interesting example where finite mesonic widths can play a central role in arriving at the correct physics @xcite . the origin of the discrepancy for the derivative sum rule is more likely to lie in short - comings of continuum model . for this sum rule the continuum model contributions never drop below 45% , which may be too large for the simple model typically used in qcd - sr calculations . alternatively , poorly known higher order terms , not present in the truncated ope may become important in the derivative sum rule . in the derivative sum rule , the next term in the series is suppressed by merely @xmath204 . the importance of carefully monitoring the validity of qcd - srs is nicely displayed in the recent debate over the behavior of vector - meson masses in nuclear matter . there an analysis involving invalid sum rules leads to the conclusion that vector - meson masses increase in finite density @xcite , in contradiction to a previous analysis @xcite also based on the ratio method . the debate is resolved in ref . @xcite where valid sum rules indicate that vector - meson masses decrease for increasing nuclear matter density . having firmly established the analysis procedure in the well understood @xmath0-meson channel , we are ready to apply the same approach to the nucleon sum rules . we will find that many results contradict the conventional wisdom . here we focus on the borel improved qcd sum rules for the generalized interpolator of ( [ chio ] ) . the sum rules proportional to the correlator @xmath205 where continuum model contributions are subtracted from the phenomenological side and placed on the ope side are @xmath206 \nonumber \\ & & \quad + { 5 + 2 \beta + 5 \beta^2 \over 256 } \ , b \ , m^2 \ , l^{-4/9 } \left [ 1 - e^{-w_1 ^ 2/m^2 } \right ] \nonumber \\ & & \quad + { 7 - 2 \beta - 5 \beta^2 \over 24 } \ , a^2 \ , l^{4/9 } -{13 - 2 \beta - 11 \beta^2 \over 96 } \ , { m_0 ^ 2 \ , a^2 \over m^2 } \ , l^{-2/27 } \nonumber \\ & & \qquad = \widetilde \lambda_{\cal o}^2 \ , e^{-m_n^2/m^2 } \ , , \label{nucl11atp } \end{aligned}\ ] ] and @xmath207 \nonumber \\ & & \quad -{3 ( 1 - \beta^2 ) \over 16 } \ , m_0 ^ 2 \ , a \ , m^2 \ , l^{-14/27 } \left [ 1 - e^{-w_2 ^ 2/m^2 } \right ] \nonumber \\ & & \quad + { 19 + 10 \beta - 29 \beta^2 \over 2 ^ 7 \ , 3 ^ 2 } \ , a \ , b \nonumber \\ & & \qquad = \widetilde \lambda_{\cal o}^2 \ , m_n \ , e^{-m_n^2/m^2 } \ , , \label{nucl11at1}\]][nucl11 ] where the dirac-@xmath26 structures are indicated on the left , and @xmath208 . the factors of @xmath209 $ ] account for the anomalous scaling of the operators and interpolators in the leading logarithmic approximation @xcite . let us begin with the traditional or standard nucleon sum rule analysis where @xmath3 corrections are ignored . the more common interpolator of ( [ chisr ] ) is utilized by setting @xmath14 in ( [ nucl11 ] ) . in addition , the traditional condensate parameter set with @xmath210 is selected in order to evaluate the validity of previously published results . for a preliminary analysis of the validities of the sum rules , the nucleon mass is fixed to 1 gev . figure [ sr34k2hdo ] illustrates the valid borel regimes for these two sum rules found by implementing the procedure discussed for the @xmath0-meson . = 11.7truecm = a comparison of figure [ sr34k2hdo ] with the analogous figure [ sr12hdo ] for the @xmath0-meson suggests the nucleon sum rules will not be as reliable . in the nucleon sum rules , the continuum model contributes 20% or more to the phenomenological side of the sum rules . in particular , the continuum model contribution in the sum rule of ( [ nucl11atp ] ) exceeds that for the derivative @xmath0-meson sum rule which has already been shown to be incompatible with the fundamental sum rule . it should not be surprising to find a similar disaster for the nucleon case . as in the @xmath0-meson case , there is an analogous ratio method for obtaining the nucleon mass that has also become popular . here the nucleon mass is isolated as a function of the borel mass by taking the ratio of equations ( [ nucl11at1])/([nucl11atp ] ) . the mass is usually extracted from a regime in which the ratio is flat . again ope convergence and ground - state dominance criteria are not checked in this approach , and too often the mass is extracted from a regime in which the continuum model dominates . figure [ sr34k2fit ] illustrates the three parameter fit of the residue @xmath148 , and the two continuum model thresholds of @xmath211 and @xmath212 . the small borel regime and the relatively huge ope uncertainties of the sum rule of ( [ nucl11atp ] ) indicate that this sum rule plays a negligible role in determining the spectral properties of the nucleon . this is a perfect example of a case where large uncertainties in the sum rule of ( [ nucl11atp ] ) would spoil the predictive ability of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) if the ratio method was used . the origin of the large uncertainties lies in the poorly known value of the four - quark condensate . the resultant fit parameters for this sum rule are also unphysical as the continuum threshold lies at zero below the nucleon pole . in other words , the present form of the sum rule at @xmath213 is unable to provide any information on the ground state that is consistent with the more reliable sum rule of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) at the structure 1 . = 11.7truecm = unfortunately , the community has incorrectly identified ( [ nucl11atp ] ) as the more reliable sum rule . this belief is based on the simple fact that the leading term of the ope ( the identity operator ) has a well known vacuum expectation value . however , the @xmath3 corrections for the identity operator @xcite are uncomfortably large . the first order corrections are independent of @xmath214 and are @xmath215 where @xmath216 . this correction is @xmath217% and suggests perturbative corrections are completely out of control for this sum rule . since the magnitude of the identity operator contribution is closely tied to the size of continuum model contributions , it is not surprising to find the valid borel regime for this sum rule disappears when @xmath3 corrections are added . another factor in the traditional preference of ( [ nucl11atp ] ) over ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) is that the second term of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) vanishes for ioffe s choice of nucleon interpolator @xmath218 . this is really nothing more than a good reason to exclude the interpolator @xmath77 of ( [ chisr ] ) as an optimal interpolator . when one considers the monstrous leading - order @xmath3 corrections , the possibility of a significant dimension - two power correction arising from a summation of the perturbative series @xcite , and the large uncertainties associated with the value of the four - quark condensate , one can not help but reach the conclusion that the qcd side of the sum rule of ( [ nucl11atp ] ) is really unknown . since the sum rule of ( [ nucl11atp ] ) has traditionally been the nucleon sum rule of choice , it is interesting to consider the predictions of this sum rule alone . applying the same techniques as used for the @xmath0-meson to ( [ nucl11atp ] ) , a three parameter fit of @xmath148 , @xmath211 and @xmath219 yields @xmath220 while setting @xmath221 slightly increases the nucleon mass to 0.47 gev , adding leading order @xmath3 corrections has a negligible effect on the fit parameters . consideration of the more recent condensate parameter set discussed in sec . [ uncert ] leads to similar results @xmath222 this may be the first qcd sum rule to predict spectral properties that significantly contradict experiment . as such , this may be the most interesting of all qcd sum rules , and we shall return to this sum rule after examining the selection of the most optimal interpolator for nucleon sum rule analyses . the predictions of ( [ nucl11atp ] ) summarized in ( [ failure ] ) are extremely different from that found in the literature . hence it is important to understand how these new results come about . a critical examination of the nucleon ground state results reported in ref . @xcite by the present author sheds considerable light on the importance of the rigorous qcd - sr analysis presented here . @xcite was the first analysis to give careful regard to the issues of ope convergence and ground - state dominance of the phenomenological side . moreover , all phenomenological parameters were included as fit parameters to be determined by the sum rules . however , there are three important differences between the analysis presented here and that of ref . @xcite . 1 . the standard logarithmic measure @xcite of sum rule agreement was used to fit the sum rules . this approach fails to apply an appropriate weight to sum rule discrepancies , unlike the @xmath4 measure of ( [ chisq ] ) . 2 . the algorithm used to fit the sum rules did not employ the cautious convergence criteria discussed in section [ algorithm ] . implementation of the new criteria aids in avoiding insignificant local minima . 3 . only the standard condensate parameter set was considered in determining the nucleon mass . here 1000 sets are considered . the optimal parameter set found in ref . @xcite corresponds to a local minimum which is sensitive to the measure of sum rule agreement , the initial parameter estimates and the condensate parameter set . other authors have managed to keep the nucleon mass closer to the experimental result by extracting the result from a regime in borel space that provides the correct answer or fixing the continuum threshold to values suggested by the particle data tables . as we shall see in section [ correl ] , fixing the continuum threshold to phenomenologically motivated values largely determines the mass . hence you _ can _ get anything you want provided you are clever enough to fix the threshold to the _ right _ value . and since the excited states are modeled there is tremendous freedom in the threshold parameter space . of course , such input may not be in agreement with the content of the ope . in any event , such results must not be regarded as predictions of qcd sum rules . having established the nucleon sum rule of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) at the structure 1 to be the potentially more reliable sum rule , it is important to determine the optimal mixing of spin-1/2 interpolators for this sum rule . it has long been established that there are two independent interpolating fields with no derivatives having the quantum numbers of spin 1/2 and isospin 1/2 . both are expected to excite the ground state nucleon from the vacuum . as such , there is a history of argument over the optimal nucleon interpolating field to be used in analyses @xcite and this issue is recognized to be of paramount importance @xcite . while some advocate an interpolating field for which the leading terms of the ope are stationary with respect to the interpolating field mixing parameter @xcite , others argue that a balance between ope convergence and qcd continuum contributions must be maintained @xcite . ideally , one would like to simply calculate with alternate interpolating fields and confirm that the nucleon properties remain unchanged . however , previous implementations of the qcd - sr approach have hindered any firm conclusions . the rigorous analysis introduced here will shed considerable light on these issues . fortunately , the lattice approach to qcd is not plagued with the same limitations and the debate over the optimal interpolating field was resolved in ref . there is was found that , to a good approximation , @xmath223 of ( [ chin2 ] ) excites pure qcd continuum . since @xmath223 has negligible overlap with the ground state nucleon , it is tempting to simply conclude that the optimal interpolating field is @xmath224 . while this is certainly the case for lattice qcd investigations , it is not the case for qcd - sr analyses . by including @xmath223 components in an interpolating field , one can reduce the continuum contributions excited by @xmath224 and allow a broader borel analysis window in which better contact with the ground state of interest is obtained . one of the most difficult things to monitor in the qcd - sr approach is whether the ope is sufficiently convergent for a particular value of borel mass . the lattice results of ref . @xcite indicate the @xmath225 correlator has the fastest converging ope , as its overlap with the nucleon ground state is negligible . similarly , the combination @xmath226 produces an ope with the slowest convergence , as this correlation function is dominated by the ground state nucleon for small borel masses . hence , errors made in truncating the ope are dominated by errors in the @xmath226 component of the general correlator . the relative error in the ope truncation can be reduced by adding @xmath223 components to the correlator . however , the @xmath223 components in the ope are simply subtracted off again by the continuum model terms . hence the relevant error is the absolute error . for @xmath227 , this error is dominated by @xmath226 components of the correlator . as a result , ope truncation errors are approximately independent of @xmath214 . this crucial point has been neglected in previous arguments regarding the optimal nucleon interpolating field . since the errors made in truncating the ope are dominated by errors in the @xmath226 component of the general correlator the criteria of a 10% limit on the hdo contribution to the ope should be applied to sum rules when @xmath228 . once this lower limit is established , it may be used for all @xmath227 . we will refer to this approach for determining the valid borel regime as the `` refined '' method in the following . the optimal nucleon interpolator must involve @xmath224 , as this interpolator is required to maintain overlap with the ground state . the task is to determine the optimal mixing of @xmath223 . since @xmath223 has negligible overlap with the nucleon , the ground state contribution to a sum rule is also independent of @xmath214 . hence , the size of the continuum model contribution is the predominant factor in determining the optimal interpolator . figure [ optcon ] illustrates the contributions of the continuum model terms in ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) for @xmath229 gev and @xmath230 gev . the following discussion is not dependent on the precise values of these parameters . the first point to be made is that contributions from the continuum model are largest for @xmath231 . this selection of mixing is the worst possible choice for extracting information on the ground state nucleon . = 11.7truecm = figure [ optcon ] also indicates it is possible to have vanishing continuum model contributions at @xmath232 or @xmath233 . however , we are relying on the continuum model to account for strength in the correlator that does not have its origin in the ground state . without a continuum model , one would need to include additional poles on the right - hand - side of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) to account for positive and negative parity excitation strength . for @xmath234 or @xmath235 the correlator is negative indicating the sum rule is saturated by a negative parity state . thus the optimal interpolator is @xmath236 or @xmath237 . to discriminate between these two regimes , we turn to the higher - dimension - operator contributions which do not contribute to the continuum model . it is these terms that provide crucial information on whether the strength in the correlator lies in the ground state or the excited states . if these terms are absent , the optimal fit of the correlator is obtained when @xmath238 and @xmath239 . in this case the continuum model and the ope become equivalent via the laplace transform of ( [ laplacetrans ] ) and the fit is perfect . hence the higher - dimension - operator contributions should be large in magnitude . a change in sign from the leading terms of the ope will also assist in distinguishing ground state strength from excited state strength as the change in the curvature of the correlator will be more prominent . the last term of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) is independent of the continuum model , and its value is plotted as a function of beta in figure [ optcon ] . the contributions are larger for @xmath236 than for @xmath240 . in addition , the sign of the contribution is opposite that of the continuum model contributions . hence the preferred regime is @xmath236 . these arguments are supported by the numerical analysis described below . in summary , the lattice results indicate ope convergence , and ground state pole contributions are approximately independent of @xmath214 . considerations of the size of continuum model contributions and the sign and magnitude of operators independent of the continuum model leads to the preferred value of @xmath241 a more precise determination of @xmath214 will depend on the details of limits for continuum model and hdo contributions , condensate values , and other parameters of the sum rules . at @xmath242 , where the leading term of the ope is stationary with respect to @xmath214 @xcite , the continuum contributions are maximal . the positive value and small magnitude of the hdo contribution indicates the stability of the leading terms of the ope will not be realized as stability in the ground state mass , coupling , nor in the continuum threshold . another point of view argues that the optimal interpolating field is one that eliminates direct instanton contributions from the correlator @xcite . however , such arguments are based on the assumption that direct instantons necessarily contribute to the nucleon correlator in a significant manner . section [ instantons ] will demonstrate that direct instantons are not necessary to maintain sum rule self consistency for a wide range of interpolating fields . the @xmath214 dependence of the direct instanton contributions to ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) is proportional to @xmath243 . minimization of instanton contributions would place @xmath244 , very near @xmath245 where the hdo term of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) vanishes and where continuum contributions are near their peak . isolation of ground state contributions is nearly impossible in this regime . therefore minimization of direct instanton contributions does not lead to an optimal interpolating field . while it is important to establish the optimal mixing of interpolating fields for qcd - sr analyses , one should not overlook the fact that there is a range of values for @xmath214 where the sum rules are expected to work . moreover , the ground state contribution to all these sum rules is equivalent to the 1% level @xcite . in other words , the right - hand side of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) for a single pole plus continuum model is independent of @xmath214 . after the first sum rule is written down , additional sum rules may be introduced with merely one new fit parameter ( the continuum threshold ) per sum rule . since direct instanton contributions to the sum rules are not independent of @xmath214 @xcite , one has an excellent opportunity to see if direct instanton contributions really are necessary to maintain sum - rule consistency . this issue is addressed in section [ instantons ] below . having discovered that @xmath223 has negligible overlap with the nucleon ground state , it might be interesting to return to the `` ioffe formula '' this time generalized for arbitrary @xmath214 @xmath246 \ , { 4 \ , \left ( 2 \pi \right ) ^2 \ , \langle \overline q q \rangle \over m^2 } \ , .\ ] ] for @xmath228 , @xmath247 gev when @xmath248 gev , or @xmath249 gev when @xmath71 gev . the explicit dependence on the choice of interpolating field and the borel mass limits the significance of the `` ioffe formula '' to a qualitative role at best . here we focus on the more reliable sum rule of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) at the optimal interpolator mixing of @xmath250 . fortunately , the @xmath3 corrections for the leading order operator of the ope are much smaller than for the identity operator at the order of 10% . the @xmath214-dependent coefficient of the quark condensate in ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) becomes @xcite @xmath251 these corrections are small relative to uncertainties in the other terms of the correlator and can be absorbed by a small shift in the condensate itself . since our qcd parameter set is extracted from analyses with neglected @xmath3 corrections , we shall do the same here . armed with knowledge of the optimal interpolator , and a refined understanding of ope convergence tests , we now present the qcd - sr predictions for the nucleon spectral properties from spin-1/2 interpolators . figure [ sr4hdo ] displays the valid borel regime for this sum rule . the hdo contributions are less than 10% of the ope contributions for this fit when @xmath228 , as indicated by the solid curve . as described above , contributions from correlator components known to be more convergent increase the hdo operator contributions making resolution of the pole from the continuum more probable . = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = figure [ sr4fit ] displays the fit for this sum rule . the near perfect linearity of the ope@xmath252continuum side of @xmath205 supports the arguments presented above . despite 40% contributions of the hdo term to this sum rule , the ope@xmath252continuum side displays the anticipated behavior of reasonable ope convergence . the optimal fit parameters obtained from consideration of 1000 qcd parameter sets are @xmath253 the uncertainty of the nucleon mass is more than double the traditional expectation at 260 mev . figures [ sr4binm ] , [ sr4binw ] , and [ sr4binlambda ] display histograms for the nucleon mass , threshold and residue respectively . these histograms will aid in the discussion of the following section . = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = table [ comparesr ] compares the prediction for @xmath254 with other estimates of @xmath255 . this residue corresponds to ioffe s interpolator of ( [ chisr ] ) and is expected to be independent of @xmath227 to the order of 1% @xcite . 0.0(0 ) .comparison of predictions for @xmath256 for various approaches to qcd . [ cols="<,<,^ " , ] what this indicates is that the intimate relationship between the quark condensate and the nucleon mass suggested in the `` ioffe formula '' is invalid . considering the assumptions made in deriving the `` ioffe formula '' one might expect the quark condensate value to be tied more tightly to the continuum model than the ground state pole , and this is borne out in table [ nucleoncorr ] . there the quark condensate plays the dominant role in determining the continuum model threshold . of course , all the condensate values themselves are correlated by the theory of qcd , and this correlation has not been included in this analysis . it may very well be that the nucleon mass is positively correlated with the quark condensate when the higher dimension condensates are also correlated with the quark condensate . the important point to recognize is that the correlation does not come about through some direct connection such as the `` ioffe formula '' . moreover , we are extracting nucleon properties in a borel regime in which these leading order condensates just happen to be the dominant ones . one could also extract the mass from much deeper in the non - perturbative regime , perhaps by a lattice qcd calculation . there , it is much higher dimension operators which account for the same nucleon mass @xcite . therefore , it is really impossible to identify a particular condensate for giving rise to ground state hadron properties . the only true statement that may be made about the relationship between condensates and spectral properties is what we have known all along : the condensates reflecting chiral symmetry breaking play a significant role in determining hadron properties . correlations among the phenomenological fit parameters themselves are qualitatively different from the correlations with the qcd parameters . figures [ rhowlambda ] , [ rhomw ] and [ rhomlambda ] display the close correspondence between all three of the fit parameters , @xmath179 , @xmath177 , and @xmath178 obtained from 1000 fits of ( [ rhosr ] ) . this close association between the @xmath0-meson spectral parameters suggests an underlying constraint on the fit parameters . indeed , local duality necessarily leads to correlations among the spectral parameters . to examine the correlations of local duality in an analytical but qualitative fashion , consider the finite energy sum rules ( fesr ) @xcite obtained from @xmath257 here , @xmath258 is given by ( [ rhovb ] ) and @xmath259 is the qcd evaluation of ( [ twopt ] ) at the structure @xmath260 . the weighting function @xmath261 for fesr is taken to be @xmath262 . these functions weight excited state contributions in favor of ground state contributions and , as such , fesr are inappropriate for a quantitative determination of ground state properties . however , the first moment and , to a lesser extent , the second moment of the fesrs can provide some general insight into the relationships among the spectral parameters . taking @xmath263 and @xmath264 yields the following two relationships @xmath265 [ fesrrho ] in a qualitative sense , the contributions from the ope on the right - hand side of ( [ fesrs ] ) are negligible . in this case ( [ fesrrho ] ) implies @xmath266 [ fesrrel ] these relationships , capturing the features of local duality in a qualitative sense , are independent of the precise values of the qcd parameters . the relationships remain prominent in the more quantitative borel sum rule analysis as indicated in figures [ rhowlambda ] , [ rhomw ] and [ rhomlambda ] . of course , the borel analysis is done independent of these qualitative constraints . the first relation , the most reliable fesr relation , is satisfied remarkably well . = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = an even more striking correlation is illustrated in figure [ sr4corrmw ] for the nucleon sum rule of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) with the optimal @xmath250 . the association between the continuum threshold and the nucleon mass is nearly one - to - one despite the underlying scatter of qcd parameter values . the explanation for this phenomena is that there is a single term in ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) which is capable of resolving the pole from the continuum . the two leading terms of the ope are used in deriving the continuum model . hence if the third term is vanishingly small , the best fit is most certainly pure continuum @xmath239 as the sum rule is satisfied as a perfect laplace transform . the few points lying above the curve in figure [ sr4corrmw ] where the mass equals the threshold are cases where the third term in the sum rule has failed to resolve the pole from the continuum . figure [ sr4corrmlambda ] displays the corresponding association for the mass and the residue of the pole . in the @xmath0-meson case there are in fact two terms independent of the continuum model in ( [ rhosr ] ) . both terms act together to resolve the pole and continuum and hence give rise to some scatter in the mass threshold association . scatter in the residue of the pole reflects the fact that all terms affect the strength of the pole . the strong associations among nucleon spectral parameters reflect the underlying constraints of local duality . relationships analogous to the fesr for the @xmath0 meson may be derived for the nucleon spectral parameters @xcite . however , the larger continuum model contributions to the nucleon correlator make the use of fesr less desirable . the approximate nature of the continuum model may be too crude for a weighting function that fails to suppress excited state strength in the spectral density . the resultant fesr relations are relatively crude and do not capture the essence of local duality as well as in the @xmath0-meson case . a very different picture develops for the correlations among the nucleon fit parameters obtained from the analysis of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) for the unfavorable value of @xmath267 . figure [ sr4at0.8corrmw ] displays the correlation between the mass and the continuum threshold , @xmath212 . the corresponding correlation between the mass and the residue is illustrated in figure [ sr4at0.8corrmlambda ] . = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = the nature of the three regimes discussed earlier in section [ secnucl11at1.8 ] is resolved here . the near - pure continuum fits are revealed in the lower - left corner of the mass - threshold scatter plot of figure [ sr4at0.8corrmw ] . the collision of the continuum threshold and the nucleon mass gives rise to the intermediate regime where the gap between ground and excited states has not been resolved . the smaller residue compensating for strength from the continuum model in these fits is illustrated in figure [ sr4at0.8corrmlambda ] . the third pole - plus - continuum regime displays the same near one - to - one correspondence between the mass and the threshold as seen in figure [ sr4corrmw ] for the optimal @xmath250 . the correlations among the spectral parameters are interesting because they reveal the manner in which the sum rules work . correlations among the fit parameters from the simultaneous analysis of ( [ nucl13atgg ] ) and ( [ nucl13atgqq ] ) at @xmath228 are illustrated in figures [ sr467corrmw2 ] and [ sr467corrmlambda2 ] . these distributions are similar to those for the celebrated @xmath0-meson sum rule , and reflect the presence of two terms separating pole from continuum . = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = arguments favoring the need for direct instanton contributions to the qcd side of qcd - srs @xcite are based on the assumption that the average instanton size @xcite , @xmath268 fm @xmath269 fm , the separation scale of the ope . even though @xmath270 , proponents of direct instanton contributions still argue that the effects of instantons are not sufficiently accounted for in qcd condensates alone . the analysis of direct instantons in nucleon sum rules are based on many additional assumptions . here we focus on the most recent investigation of ref . @xcite . there , @xmath3 corrections to the identity operator are neglected . as discussed in section [ nucleon11 ] these leading order corrections are 50% and suggest that @xmath3 corrections are completely out of control . moreover the possibility of a significant dimension - two power correction arising from a summation of the perturbative series , uncertainties surrounding the factorization of the four - quark operator , coupled with an absence of a valid borel regime for the sum rule of ( [ nucl11atp ] ) make any conclusions dubious . in addition , the ope is truncated at dimension six . as we saw in section [ nucleon11 ] the dimension six , seven , and eight operators are crucial to separating the ground state pole from the continuum . without the dimension seven term , the best fit of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) is pure continuum . the fit is perfect when @xmath239 and @xmath271 . hence , the nucleon sum rule at the structure 1 in ref . @xcite ( equation 12 ) is unstable by design . any further discussion of stabilizing the sum rule by adding instanton contributions is uninteresting . finally , issues surrounding the problems of double counting were handled crudely by simply eliminating ope contributions beyond dimension five . hence one should not be prejudiced by existing analyses suggesting nucleon sum rules require direct instanton contributions . the issue is really not settled . for the spin-1/2 interpolator of ( [ chin1 ] ) , direct instanton contributions to the sum rule of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) are governed by the factor @xcite @xmath272 the direct instanton contributions were argued to be of vital importance in ref . @xcite in the vicinity of @xmath273 . in the lattice qcd investigation of @xcite it was discovered that the overlap of the interpolator @xmath223 with the nucleon ground state is one hundred times smaller than that for @xmath224 . while the nucleon mass is certainly independent of the interpolating field mixing parameter @xmath214 , one also has the residue of the pole , @xmath148 , independent of @xmath214 at the 1% level . this anticipated independence of both ground state properties provides new opportunities for evaluating the necessity of direct instanton effects . as a first test of sum rule consistency , we utilize the sum rule of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) to extract the mass as a function of the interpolating field mixing parameter @xmath214 . as @xmath274 the terms contributing to the continuum model become very small and additional poles must be added to the phenomenological side of the sum rule to account for strength in the correlator lying above the ground state mass . as a result we restrict @xmath275 . valid borel regimes were found over the range @xmath276 . the coefficient @xmath277 changes by 50% over this range . if direct instanton contributions are indeed important at @xmath278 , the absence of direct instanton contributions in this investigation might be revealed by a significant @xmath214 dependence in the nucleon mass . figure [ sr4massevol ] displays the ratio of the nucleon mass extracted at @xmath214 to the value obtained at the optimal @xmath279 . uncertainties are obtained from two uncorrelated samples of 200 qcd parameter sets . as such the central value at @xmath250 need not be 1 . the large uncertainties associated with this sum rule prevent a sensitive test of the necessity of direct instantons . it is clear that all ratios accommodate the ratio of 1 . = 11.7truecm = a more demanding test may be performed using the sum rules arising from the consideration of the overlap of spin-1/2 and spin-3/2 interpolators . the smaller uncertainties allow a more interesting examination of these issues . in addition , the continuum model terms are independent of @xmath214 and provide a wider range of @xmath214 in which a valid borel regime exists . figure [ massevol ] addresses the dependence of the nucleon mass obtained from the sum rules of ( [ nucl13atgg ] ) and ( [ nucl13atgqq ] ) on the interpolating field mixing parameter @xmath214 . here , ratios of the mass obtained at finite @xmath214 to @xmath228 are displayed . sum rule consistency demands that all ratios agree with one , and this is satisfied in figure [ massevol ] without direct instanton contributions . the uncertainty estimates are obtained from two uncorrelated samples of 200 qcd parameter sets . we note that a valid regime does not exist for @xmath280 . hence the use of the ioffe interpolator ( @xmath14 ) is a particularly unfavorable choice for these sum rules . the large error bar at @xmath281 reflects the small valid borel regime used in the fit . = 11.7truecm = the corresponding dependence of @xmath148 on @xmath214 is plagued by huge uncertainties . small changes in the nucleon mass which appears squared in the exponential of the phenomenological side of the sum rules leads to large fluctuations in @xmath148 . hence it is difficult to gain any information on the possible size of direct instanton contributions . however , they are certainly unnecessary as all ratios encompass 1 . in order to proceed , we consider fixing the nucleon mass to the value determined at @xmath228 in an attempt to reduce the uncertainty in @xmath148 . figure [ lambdaevolmfixed ] displays these ratios . the corresponding plot for the continuum threshold is given in figure [ contevol ] . = 11.7truecm = = 11.7truecm = for @xmath282 the continuum threshold tends to rise and the distribution of the residue remains largely independent of @xmath214 without direct instanton contributions . for @xmath283 the continuum threshold drops to account for strength that would otherwise be absorbed by the rising nucleon mass as illustrated in figure [ massevol ] . with the threshold near the pole position , strength which might otherwise rest in the pole has been suppressed as discussed in section [ phenomcorr ] . hence the drop in the residue is an artifact of our fixing the nucleon mass in an attempt to reduce the error bar . in summary , the independence of the mass and residue from @xmath227 is satisfied within uncertainties in the absence of direct instanton contributions . as the sum rules are improved in the future and qcd input parameters are better determined , it will be important to repeat this analysis to again evaluate the necessity of direct instanton contributions or other refinements of the qcd - sr approach . at present , direct instanton contributions are not required . this is good news indeed as the amount of modeling required for instanton estimates is relatively unpalatable when compared to that for the standard qcd - srs themselves . in fact a preferable approach would be to simply raise the ope separation scale further into the perturbative regime to ensure that direct instanton effects are more fully accounted . however , this does not yet appear to be necessary . ground state properties have been found to be independent of the interpolating field mixing parameter @xmath214 . on the other hand , the leading terms of the ope for ( [ nucl11 ] ) are very dependent on @xmath214 . this situation has interesting ramifications for previous analyses of coordinate space point - to - point correlation functions @xcite where there has been some confusion surrounding the physics represented in point - to - point correlation functions . in ref . @xcite some conclusions are drawn from an incorrect interpretation of the physics represented in two - point correlators . these authors suggest that the behavior of a ratio of the interacting to free correlator can reveal information on clustering in the scalar diquark channel . it should be emphasized that the phenomenological description of the two - point function involves the baryon mass , the continuum threshold describing the effective onset of excited states and the residue of the pole which indicates the ability of the particular interpolator to excite the baryon from the qcd vacuum . information on quark configurations in the nucleon wave function is absent in point - to - point correlation functions . the coordinate - space correlator may be obtained from ( [ rhop ] ) or ( [ rho1 ] ) via @xmath284 the important point here is that for large @xmath285 , @xmath286 is dominated by the contribution from the ground state pole . as such @xmath286 is independent of @xmath227 at the 1% level , or alternatively @xmath286 is independent of @xmath287 at the 10% level @xcite . the coordinate space analyses focused on a ratio of @xmath288 where @xmath289 is the free coordinate - space correlator . for the correlator at the structure @xmath290 studied in @xcite at @xmath14 , the generalized free correlator is given by @xmath291 since the denominator is @xmath214 dependent and the numerator is independent of @xmath214 for large @xmath285 , the ratio is dependent on @xmath214 . the rate at which the curve turns up as the ground state dominates and the free correlator continues to drop off for increasing @xmath285 is dependent on the interpolator mixing parameter @xmath214 . the rate at which the ratio increases above 1 describes the relative weightings of ground versus excited states generated by the interpolating field . it has nothing to do with the possibility of scalar diquark degrees of freedom being predominant in the nucleon wave function . moreover , a comparison with a @xmath292 correlation function for example has no meaning . a rigorous procedure for extracting quantities of phenomenological interest from qcd sum rules has been established . we have performed a comprehensive analysis of ground state @xmath0-meson and nucleon qcd sum rules . the inclusion of uncertainty estimates for the phenomenological parameters has allowed us to evaluate the predictive ability and self consistency of the qcd - srs . when the analysis is done rigorously , qcd sum rules are predictive . some have argued that fitting sum rules appears to be more of an art than a science . indeed , many of the findings here contradict the conventional wisdom of both practitioners and skeptics alike @xcite and suggests that past arguments have been based more on rhetoric than sound scientific arguments . * the nucleon sum rule of ( [ nucl11atp ] ) , traditionally taken to be the most reliable sum rule , fails to have a borel regime where both the truncated ope is reasonably convergent and the ground state dominates the phenomenology . * the nucleon sum rule of ( [ nucl11at1 ] ) , also obtained from spin-1/2 interpolating fields , resolves the nucleon mass to @xmath293 mev . this uncertainty is more than double the value commonly assumed by most practitioners . * the nucleon sum rules of ( [ nucl13atgg ] ) and ( [ nucl13atgqq ] ) obtained from the consideration of a spin-3/2 isospin-1/2 interpolator projected by the generalized spin-1/2 isospin-1/2 interpolator are much more reliable than the traditional sum rules . they have greater overlap with the ground state pole relative to the continuum model , have broader valid borel regimes and provide phenomenological estimates of nucleon spectral properties which are more stable than those obtained from the conventional sum rules . * the nucleon mass obtained from a simultaneous analysis of ( [ nucl13atgg ] ) and ( [ nucl13atgqq ] ) at the optimal @xmath228 is resolved to @xmath294 mev using qcd parameter estimates from the literature . * the dependence of the spectral parameters on the interpolating field mixing parameter is in accord with expectations without resort to direct instanton contributions . this is compelling evidence that instanton physics is adequately accounted for in the nonperturbative vacuum expectation values . the latter point is truly exciting for the qcd sum rule approach . the amount of modeling required for instanton estimates is relatively unpalatable when compared to that for the standard qcd - srs themselves . * the leading order @xmath3 corrections are the order of 50% . as such , perturbative corrections to this sum rule are very likely out of control . * summation of the perturbative series may give rise to an important dimension - two contribution @xcite . the size of such a correction is presently unknown . * contributions from the four - quark condensate are not well known and appear to be large . unlike the @xmath0-meson sum rule , the four - quark condensate is not suppressed by a factor of @xmath3 . * a regime in which the ope is reasonably convergent while the phenomenological description is dominated by the ground state pole is non - existent . if one proceeds with this sum rule , the results are very sensitive to the model for the continuum , or inaccuracies in the ope lead to incorrect results as seen here . the `` ioffe formula '' directly relating the nucleon mass to the local chiral condensate has been found to be misleading at best . while there is a strong connection between chiral symmetry breaking and hadron properties , such detailed or direct relationships are impossible to make and it is inappropriate to be more specific on the origin of the nucleon mass . the fundamental and derivative sum rules for the @xmath0 meson have also been examined . once again , the popular sum rule analysis has been found to be undesirable . the use of derivative sum rules for the determination of @xmath0-meson spectral properties is unfavorable . increased continuum model contributions , poorer ope convergence , and loss of vital information in the derivative sum rule results in discrepancies between the fundamental and derivative sum rules . the associations among the phenomenological fit parameters are particularly interesting as they reveal how the sum rules resolve the spectral properties . we have found that the separation of the ground state from the excited state continuum model is completely determined by the high dimension operators of the ope which are not used in formulating the continuum model . the practice of fixing the continuum threshold to a preferred value has been exposed as strongly determining the outcome of the sum rule analysis . qcd sum rule determinations of phenomenological spectral properties are necessarily dependent on the treatment of high dimension operators where a factorization assumption is usually invoked . moreover , careful attention to ope convergence is crucial to extracting meaningful results . these issues are somewhat unsettling , as we are working with expansions which are asymptotic . the emphasis here has been on exploring the qcd parameter space via monte carlo . further refinements of the parameter space might be made by adjusting the valid borel regime for each qcd parameter set such that the 10%50% criteria are satisfied . this was not done here in order to explore other criteria and reduce the sensitivity to a reasonable yet somewhat arbitrary criteria . in addition , the hlder inequalities might be applied as a further check of the validity and consistency of the sum rules @xcite . we are now in an excellent position to attack phenomena which is of current interest to the nuclear physics community . the techniques are currently being applied to an in - medium study of vector meson properties @xcite . there the debates over the behavior of the vector - meson masses and the sum rules to be used in extracting vector meson properties in nuclear matter are resolved . using standard in - medium condensate estimates , the analysis leaves no doubt that vector - meson masses decrease with increasing density . these techniques are also being applied to in - medium properties of the nucleon @xcite , by generalizing the vacuum sum rules analyzed here to finite nuclear matter density . the monte - carlo techniques are resolving the predictive ability of the in - medium sum rules . another investigation utilizing these monte - carlo techniques studies the qcd - sr determination of the @xmath295 meson mixing parameter @xmath16 @xcite . there , correlations between the ratio of @xmath296 and @xmath297 quark masses are particularly interesting . the relatively large uncertainty in the residue of the pole does not bode well for qcd sum rule analysis beyond two - point functions . for example , the residue of the pole appears as a pre - factor to any nucleon matrix element such as @xmath92 or magnetic form factors @xcite . it will not be surprising to find uncertainties in these observables as large as the 35% relative error in the squared residue itself . as the uncertainties in the additional vacuum matrix elements relevant to the three - point functions are folded in the uncertainties are likely to exceed 50% and may in fact approach 100% . analyses of these issues are currently underway @xcite . when compared to uncertainty estimates previously published in the literature , our uncertainty estimates are somewhat larger . this is not due to any shortcoming of the approach presented here . instead , previous authors have failed to provide a reliable method for determining realistic uncertainties . often , uncertainty estimates have been conjectured without any supporting quantitative analysis . this in - depth examination of qcd sum rule self consistency paints a favorable picture for further quantitative refinements of the approach . of course such progress will be very difficult , as there are many aspects of the approach which must be refined for any particular improvement to be relevant . the techniques introduced here , such as maintaining independence of ground state properties from the interpolating field mixing parameter , might be used to further narrow the uncertainties of the approach . it is extremely important to refine the qcd - sr approach such that uncertainties in the qcd input parameters may be reduced while maintaining @xmath298 . research in this direction is required before meaningful qcd - sr - based predictions for nucleon matrix elements and moments of structure functions are possible . i am indebted to kai hencken for his careful checking of the wilson coefficients and his discovery of new corrections in the dimension seven operators . his contribution is key to resolving the discrepancy between the sum rules presented here and modern estimates of the vacuum condensates . thanks also to xuemin jin for numerous beneficial discussions . dick furnstahl and xuemin jin have provided a critical examination of this analysis and i thank them for their insightful comments . thanks also to javed iqbal for his contributions to the evaluation of the finite width integrals for the @xmath0-meson correlator . many years ago , jimmy law provided the optimization routine used in this investigation , and i thank him for providing this useful program . this research was supported by the natural sciences and engineering research council of canada and the u.s . department of energy under grant de - fg06 - 88er40427 . d. b. leinweber , in _ lattice 93 , proceedings of the international symposium _ , edited by t. draper , s. gottlieb , a. soni , and d. toussaint , * 34 * , ( 1994 ) 407 , dallas , tx , 1993 , nucl . b ( proc . suppl . ) . f. x. lee , d. b. leinweber , and x. jin , new qcd sum rules for nucleon axial vector coupling constants , in _ panic 96 , proceedings of the xiv international conference on particles and nucleii _ , river edge , nj , ( 1996 ) , tjnaf , world scientific publishing co. , u. washington pp doe / er/40427 - 10-n96 . Abstract:
[ "a new monte - carlo based uncertainty analysis is introduced to quantitatively determine the predictive ability of qcd sum rules . a comprehensive analysis of ground state @xmath0-meson and nucleon spectral properties is performed . many of the findings contradict the conventional wisdom of both practitioners and skeptics alike . associations between the phenomenological fit parameters are particularly interesting as they reveal how the sum rules resolve the spectral properties . the use of derivative sum rules for the determination of @xmath0-meson spectral properties is shown to be a very unfavorable approach . most prior nucleon sum rule analyses are based on a sum rule which is found to be invalid ; the results are suspect , and should be reevaluated . the `` ioffe formula '' , argued by many to qualitatively encapsulate a description of the nucleon mass in terms of the chiral symmetry breaking order parameter @xmath1 is misleading at best . qcd sum rules are found to be self - consistent without contributions from direct instantons . this implies that instanton effects are adequately accounted for in the nonperturbative vacuum condensates . this in - depth examination of qcd sum rule self consistency paints a favorable picture for further quantitative refinements of the qcd sum rule approach ." ]
18,150
18,150
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in the course of a nova eruption , a significant amount of material ( @xmath2 m@xmath3 ) is ejected , which can form a visible shell around the system . observation of this shell can lead to accurate distances to the novae via the expansion parallax method . for this reason , searches for nova shells have been undertaken by various groups ( e.g. @xcite , @xcite ) . with the distance in hand , one can then determine the luminosity of the system at maximum light , which can be used to calibrate the maximum magnitude - rate of decline relation . use of this relation can allow for determinations of the distance to objects such as the virgo cluster @xcite . when we embarked on a survey of nova remnants with small telescopes to measure nova shell line fluxes , we did not expect to make a contribution to the study of nova shell morphology and the nova luminosity calibration . nevertheless , the results ( including the discovery of 4 previously undetected shells ) , combined with data collected at larger earthbound telescopes and with _ hubble space telescope _ , encouraged us to attempt a derivation of nova distances and luminosities at maximum and minimum . we constructed maximum magnitude - rate of decline relations , based on the standard light curve parameters @xmath4 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 , and also studied the distribution of minimum magnitudes . the use of novae as distance indicators poses more problems than that of other methods based on variable stars . while novae are brighter than pulsating variables , their light curve characteristics require a monitoring with high time resolution ( a day or better ) , and the determination of the decline rate requires close monitoring until a given object declines by two or three magnitudes . the nova luminosity calibration might be done on a purely photometric basis , using ( unreddened ) novae in extragalactic systems ( m31 , magellanic clouds ) . however , we would need to tie the novae into the distance ladder by pulsating variables or binaries , thus introducing possible systematic errors of the distance scale . the other approach is the expansion parallax method , which combines the angular expansion rate ( observed several years or decades after outburst ) with radial velocity observations during outburst or at later stages . this approach is also open to systematic errors . well - observed novae give evidence that mass ejection is not spherical , and inclination effects play an important role . furthermore , the radial velocity of the shell of a given nova is often variable with time , even if we restrict ourselves to the observation of the `` principal system '' . high and low velocity material is present , the slower material sometimes shows signs of acceleration . similar problems arise in the determination of angular expansion rates , since the bright nebular structures are often immersed in a more extended fuzz . the more rapidly expanding shell becomes increasingly fainter ( a phenomenon which is also seen in the ` sharpening ' of the nebular emission line profiles in nova spectra in the course of the outburst ) , making the measurement of the shell size more difficult . if we restrict ourselves to the spectral emission line maxima and brightest features in the resolved shells , we still encounter a major problem , since these condensations are often arranged in an inclined `` equatorial ring '' . a combination of both methods is the derivation of the form of the maximum magnitude - rate of decline ( mmrd ) calibration from an extragalactic sample , while determining its zero point calibration using galactic novae . additional problems are the determination of the proper light maximum ( sometimes it is uncertain whether the observed maximum is the true maximum , especially when spectral observations in early stages are lacking ) and the amount of interstellar absorption ( most galactic novae are concentrated towards the galactic plane ) . galactic novae with a well - covered maximum ( to obtain the rate of decline ) , uv observations at the nebular or minimum stage ( to derive the reddening from line ratios or the 2200 band ) , and a well - resolved shell ( to derive the kinematic characteristics ) , are extremely rare . only a handful of novae fulfill these criteria , and a luminosity calibration based on small number statistics may suffer from systematic effects , such as the effect of white dwarf masses or chemical composition on the luminosity . thus we tried to use all novae for which expansion parallax data are available , by making at some points `` educated guesses '' or using `` brute averaging '' . this certainly puts a lot of arbitrariness in the calibration , but we hope that this fairly extensive data base , which will not be augmented considerably for a long time , gives a reasonable insight in the present state of the art of novae as distance calibrators , if one deals with available , and not ideal , samples . the observations were obtained on 1998 march 21 - 23 with dutch 0.9 m telescope at the eso la silla observatory , using a tek tk512cb chip ( @xmath7 pixels ) with a scale of @xmath8/pixel . further observations were obtained at the kitt peak national observatory on 1998 may 28 - june 1 with the 2.1 m telescope using the tek `` t1ka '' chip ( @xmath9 pixels with a scale of @xmath10/pixel ) and on 1998 june 30 with the 0.9 m telescope using the tek `` t2ka '' chip ( @xmath11 pixels with a scale of @xmath12/pixel ) . the data were obtained with narrow band filters centered at h@xmath0 ( 80 fwhm at eso , 36 at kpno ) and [ o iii ] @xmath15007 ( 55 at eso , 31 at kpno ) , as well as off - band and _ ubvr _ filters ; see table [ tbl-1 ] for details . the data were reduced in the standard manner . the search for shells was performed using two different techniques . first , a psf was generated for each image ( with the routines in daophot ) using , whenever possible , stars of comparable brightness to the nova . the psf was then subtracted from each star in the image , and the resultant image examined for evidence of extended emission ( i.e. residual flux ) around both the nova and nearby stars ( as a control sample ) . in almost every case , this technique was definitive . the second method was to perform a radial profile fit of the nova and several stars of comparable magnitude . the fits were compared to determine if the nova had a broader profile . when a shell was detected , a contour plot was generated from which the size of the shell was measured by determining the edge of the shell ( i.e. where the shell merged into the sky ) . for shell sizes obtained from the literature , we note in table [ tbl-2 ] the measurement technique ( direct image or radial profile ) used . radial profiles were quoted for only four objects . in two cases ( rw umi and v351 pup ) , the two techniques yielded consistent answers , while in the remaining two cases ( pw vul and qu vul ) , the radial profile values were considerably smaller than the direct image values . to maintain as consistent a dataset as possible , these discrepant radial profile values were not used in our analysis . we have detected shells around 10 objects , and in table [ tbl-2 ] we present the measured diameters from our data , as well as summarize the previous measurements from the literature . we have obtained data on another 5 objects in which we fail to detect a shell , but for which a shell has been reported in the literature or can be seen in wfpc2 data . since different measurement techniques can produce different results , we include in the table a code indicating the measurement technique used ( radial profile fit or direct image ) ; @xmath13 of the measurements are from direct images where the shell is clearly resolved . for the radial profile fits , a correction for the psf has been made , while for the direct images , not such correction was made . we have not corrected our measurements of direct images for geometric effects caused by the ellipticity of the shell ( see below ) . in the following sections 4 and 5 , we present the results of our new observations ( shell sizes , expansion rates ) , and derive distances and luminosities ; we include the supporting data necessary for these derivations ( i.e. interstellar extinction , light curve parameters ) . nebular expansion parallaxes are a fundamental method for determining the distances to novae if the three basic parameters age , expansion velocity , and size can be properly determined . while age can ( usually ) be determined accurately , size ( geometry ) and expansion velocity are less certain , and will dominate the uncertainty in the derived distance . to derive a luminosity furthermore requires an accurate light curve and a trustworthy reddening estimate . projected nova shells sometimes appear spherically symmetric , but in many cases are oval . furthermore , the densest gas clouds are often concentrated in a ring , which is inclined to the line of sight of the observer . thus , projection effects should be taken into account ( see @xcite ) . there is general agreement that if nova shells are non - spherical , they are prolate ellipsoids . from the shells of the slow novae t aur , dq her , bt mon , rr pic , and fh ser , whose inclinations can be estimated with some confidence , an average ellipticity @xmath14 is deduced ; if major diameters , or some average diameters are used ( as in our diameter and radial profile data ) , errors should on the average be within 10% of the true distance . other novae like gk per or v603 aql tend to have more spherical shells , or at least ` condensations ' arranged in a circular pattern . radial velocities show a very large dispersion , not only in the different `` spectral systems '' ( see , e.g. @xcite ) , but also for a given system . if a p cygni line profile is observed soon after outburst , the radial velocity of the absorption line is strongly influenced by the superimposed emission , but such radial velocities are the only information available for some objects . in the nebular stage , `` castellated '' emission line profiles are observed . they have broad wings that generally disappear at later phases . direct images of nova shells often show the associated condensations ( rings or blobs ) , surrounded by a faint fuzz , which originates in faster moving material ( as seen , e.g , deep images of nova shells in @xcite ) . for several objects in our survey , bright condensations are still close to the star and are easily resolved on hst images , while more extended faint fuzz shows up on images taken with earthbound telescopes . ideally , one should be able to associate maxima of emission lines with given condensations in the shell , i.e. one should have a clear idea about the geometry of the shell . however , the clumps most easily seen on direct images are those moving at right angles to the line of sight , and do not contribute to the width or `` castellation '' of the emission line . in most cases , spatial information of shell spectra , which is essential for reconstructing the shell geometry , is missing . if there was no deceleration of the expanding shell , then measurements at any age would suffice for an accurate distance measurement . however , depending on the neighboring environment , nova shells could suffer from deceleration . @xcite presented a method to approximate the temporal variation of the shell radius , which can be applied if observations at many epochs are available . as only hr del and v603 aql have sufficient data for a deceleration determination , we have derived distances to all objects assuming no deceleration . our estimates are given in table [ tbl-3 ] . the information needed to determine the absolute magnitude at maximum @xmath15 or 15 days after maximum @xmath16 , which is essential for the use of a nova as a `` standard candle '' , is : \1 . a trustworthy apparent magnitude at maximum ( either a photoelectric @xmath17 , @xmath18 , visual ( @xmath19 ) or photographic ( pg ) magnitude ) , as well as a well - defined light curve . in all cases , original sources have been re - examined , and light curve parameters have been re - determined , rather than taken from data collections like @xcite . we prefer photoelectric @xmath18 magnitudes over visual @xmath19 magnitudes , and only quote photographic ( pg ) magnitudes if no other ones are available . the value of the interstellar reddening can be derived with sufficient accuracy from multi - wavelength observations of objects in decline ( e.g. from emission line ratios or the strength of the 2200 band ) , or from uv observations of old novae ( strength of the 2200 band ) . in cases where no such information was available , @xmath20 was determined by the help of the galactic extinction program of @xcite , which interpolates and averages data based on various studies of galactic extinction . in addition , the determination of the absolute magnitude of postnovae requires a reliable magnitude in the minimum stage . we took @xmath18-magnitudes from our survey , as well as from @xcite and a forthcoming statistical study of postnova luminosities @xcite . in the following , absolute magnitudes of novae at maximum light are usually given only with an accuracy of @xmath21 , and at minimum with an accuracy of @xmath22 . calculations were often done with higher accuracy , and when corrections ( photographic to visual magnitudes , effects of accretion disc inclination ) were applied , the result was rounded to the same accuracy . cp pup was a fast nova that reached a maximum of @xmath23 in november 1942 . visual and photographic light curves were published by @xcite and @xcite , from which we derive @xmath4 = 6 , @xmath24 days ( averaged over the visual and photographic curves ) , and @xmath25 , where @xmath4 is the time for a nova to decline 2 magnitudes from maximum , @xmath5 is the time to decline by 3 magnitudes , and @xmath6 is the magnitude 15 days after maximum . the first reported detection of a shell was by zwicky ( see @xcite ) , who noted a diameter of @xmath26 in 1955 in red light . @xcite observed the shell in 1980 ( h@xmath0/[n ii ] ) and found a diameter of 14 , while @xcite found the same shell size ( h@xmath0/[n ii ] ) in 1981 . more recently , @xcite found a diameter of 20 ( h@xmath0/[n ii ] ) in 1995 . a _ hubble space telescope _ image , obtained with the wfpc2 and f656n ( h@xmath0 ) filter in 1995 ( program 6060 ) , shows the stellar remnant surrounded by a circle of bright knots of diameter @xmath27 ; the average surface brightness in the shell is @xmath28 . our h@xmath0 image ( figure [ fig1 ] ) reveals about 11 blobs arranged in a circular shell @xmath29 in diameter ( average surface brightness is @xmath30 ) . the same arrangement is seen in our [ o iii ] data ( average surface brightness of @xmath31 ) . the clumpiness seen in the 1980 and 1995 frames is still present . the expansion velocity ( @xmath32 ) for cp pup has been determined by @xcite and @xcite , who derived a value of 1500 km / s shortly after outburst . spectra in the nebular stage @xcite show a profile consisting of 11 emission components , with a velocity spread between @xmath33 and + 570 km / s . similar results were obtained by @xcite ( @xmath34 and + 590 km / s ) . spectroscopy of the resolved blobs in the shell seen in the ground - based images yields a similar range in velocities @xcite . we have assumed a @xmath35 km / s , based on gratton s result . previous distances estimates ( @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite ) place cp pup at distances of 1.5 , 1.6 and @xmath36 kpc , respectively , while @xcite give 0.85 kpc , by neglecting the shell geometry and assuming a much smaller expansion velocity . since this is a well - observed object , we will illustrate the uncertainties in the expansion rate that directly enters into the distance determination . we compare the ground - based deep h@xmath0 frame , obtained with the eso / mpia 2.2 m telescope in 1987 @xcite , the snapshot hst image of 1995 , and our h@xmath0 frame , obtained 1998 with the eso / dutch 0.92 m telescope . the expansion rate derived from the centers of the blobs that are arranged in the circular shell is 0.151 , 0.153 and 0.151 arcsec / year , respectively . in spite of the fact that the limiting magnitude and the seeing effects are very different for the three frames , the results are in good agreement . if the size outlined by the outer edges of the blobs is used , the expansion rates are 0.193 , 0.187 , and 0.178 ; furthermore , the 1987 image reaches to fainter surface magnitudes , and the extent of the `` faint fuzz '' leads to an expansion rate of @xmath37/yr . the hst exposure reveals that instead of eleven blobs , the shell consists of about 30 blobs with typical diameters of @xmath38 ( some are more extended and show special shapes ) the image also shows a symmetry axis that goes through several blobs which may be interpreted as `` polar blobs '' , while the remainder form an ring that is fragmented into @xmath39 20 single clouds . if the ring is circular , its ellipticity indicates an inclination of @xmath40 , and the blob - ring structure would form a prolate ellipsoid with @xmath41 . correspondingly , the radial velocities observed in high - resolution spectra a few years after outburst , assumed to form principally in the fragments of the ring , must be corrected for inclination . thus , while the measured radial velocity is @xmath42 km / s , the true @xmath43 km / s , and the distance , derived form the expansion rate of the blob centers ( along the major axis ) , is 1140 pc . if this distance and the expansion rate of the faint fuzz are used to calculate the radial velocity of the `` fast material '' , a value of 1415 km / s is derived , which is similar to that observed in the absorption lines in the spectrum of the nova observed shortly after maximum . such a dichotomy of fast and slow moving material , forming shells of different diameters , also occurs in pw vul , qu vul , v842 cen and v1974 cyg ( see below ) . @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath45 . thus , the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath46 , @xmath47 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath48 . summing up , if the true expansion velocity is known , the use of `` outer edges '' would decrease the distance by 20% , the neglect of the inclination angle would decrease the distance by 32% , and a `` wrong '' expansion velocity of 1400 - 1500 km / s would increase the distance by @xmath49 . if these errors are taken to be typical ones , luminosities of objects for which details on shell structure and extent , inclination and radial velocity are not known , may suffer errors of up to @xmath50 . ct ser was discovered well past maximum light in early 1948 , and was monitored intensely during decline . the nova was observed again by @xcite , who report a typical cv spectrum containing balmer and he ii @xmath14686 emission . there have been no reports of a detection of a shell for this object . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure [ fig2 ] , clearly reveals a nearly circular shell in the psf - subtracted image with a diameter of @xmath51 in both directions ( with an average surface brightness of @xmath52 ) . the shell does not appear in the [ o iii ] data ( with a @xmath53 limiting surface brightness of @xmath54 ) . although they do not report on the existence of a shell , @xcite do provide @xmath55 km / s for ct ser . there are no previous distances estimates for ct ser . based on the above expansion velocity , we derive a distance of 1.4 kpc . according to the galactic extinction model of @xcite , the extinction is low ( @xmath56 ) , and is neglected here . the observed apparent maximum magnitude , @xmath57 , is likely @xmath58 below the true maximum . the observed absolute magnitude at maximum , @xmath59 , supports the assumption that ct ser was a slow nova discovered long after maximum . the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath60 . rw umi was a slow nova at high galactic latitude with a large outburst amplitude . the photographic light curve by @xcite yields @xmath61 at maximum , @xmath62 days , @xmath63 days , and @xmath64 , although it is not certain that the true maximum was observed , since there is a gap of 16 days before the first positive observation , and there is no spectroscopic data taken during outburst . a marginally resolved shell was originally detected by @xcite with a diameter of @xmath65 . more recently , @xcite observed a diffuse shell with a diameter of @xmath66 , as well as two regions of nebulous emission unconnected to the shell . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure [ fig3 ] , fails to detect either the diffuse shell nor the two unconnected regions seen by @xcite ; the @xmath53 limiting surface brightness is @xmath67 . the shell is also not visible in our [ o iii ] data to a limiting surface brightness of @xmath68 . a wfpc2 h@xmath0 image obtained about five months prior to our observations ( for details see @xcite program 7386 ) also failed to detect the shell to a @xmath53 limiting surface brightness of @xmath69 . in the five years between the observations , it appears the shell has faded below the detection limit . @xcite estimated @xmath70 km / s . previous distance estimates place rw umi at a distance of @xmath71 kpc ( @xcite estimated 5.6 kpc , @xcite @xmath72 kpc and @xcite @xmath73 kpc ) . we adopt the latter result . a value of @xmath74 is derived from the program of @xcite . with an apparent maximum magnitude @xmath75 ( which may not correspond to true outburst maximum ) , the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath76 ( error from distance ) , @xmath77 , and the absolute magnitude at postoutburst minimum is @xmath78 . hr del was an unusually slow nova with a well - observed outburst . the @xmath18 light curve compiled by @xcite yields @xmath79 , @xmath80 days , @xmath81 days , and @xmath82 . @xcite first obtained spatially resolved spectroscopy of the nebular shell , followed by a more detailed study by @xcite . @xcite obtained the first photograph of the resolved shell in [ o iii ] , finding a oval remnant @xmath83 in size in 1981 . @xcite obtained ccd imaging in both [ o iii ] and h@xmath0/[n ii ] in 1992 , which revealed a ring - like structure of diameter @xmath84 in h@xmath0/[n ii ] , and a bipolar structure of similar diameter in [ o iii ] . the h@xmath0/[n ii ] also revealed enhancements that lie at the same positions as the [ o iii ] components , although whether this implies emission from the same material , or a simple line - of - sight alignment , is not clear . in 1993 , @xcite re - observed hr del , revealing more extended emission ( @xmath85 ) than previously seen . a _ hubble space telescope _ image , obtained with the wfpc2 and f656n ( h@xmath0 ) filter ( program 6770 ) , does not show the enhancements seen by @xcite , and has a smaller extent ( @xmath86 ) ; the average surface brightness is @xmath87 . our images , shown in figure [ fig4 ] , are similar to that in @xcite , with h@xmath0 having a complete shell ( @xmath88 ) , and a surface brightness ranging from @xmath89 in the outer region to @xmath90 in the inner region . the [ o iii ] image shows a bi - polar structure , with an average surface brightness of @xmath91 . the enhancements seen by @xcite in the h@xmath0/[n ii ] image are not present in our image , and the emission in the 2 lines appear to be growing at slightly different rates ( i.e. the major axis in [ o iii ] is @xmath92 ) . the expansion velocity for hr del was measured by @xcite ( 470 km / s ) , @xcite ( 540 km / s ) , @xcite ( 520 km / s ) , and @xcite ( 560 km / s ) . previous expansion parallax measurements ( @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite ) yield a distance for hr del of @xmath93 pc . distances based on other techniques ( e.g. interstellar lines , reddening , light curve decline ) yield comparable values of @xmath94 pc @xcite . based on an expansion velocity of 525 km / s ( similar to that used by the papers cited above ) , we derive a distance of 750 pc . note that we attempted to fit the hr del data to derive the deceleration , but the best fit resulted in an acceleration of the shell . an acceleration is possible if there is a fast wind from the stellar remnant , and p cygni profiles ( indicative of outflow ) have been detected in the spectrum of hr del @xcite . the expansion rates for hr del show significant variations , with the measurement of @xcite being the most discrepant . that observation was obtained with a similar filter and exposure time to our data , but with a telescope twice as large , and therefore goes much fainter . this can be seen by overlaying our data on the @xcite h@xmath0 image , which shows that our shell is slightly larger than the main emission in their image , and that we fail to detect their lowest ( @xmath95 ) contour . we adopt a distance of @xmath96 kpc . @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath97 , and with an apparent maximum magnitude @xmath98 , the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath99 , @xmath100 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath101 . v3888 sgr was discovered in late 1974 during its decline from observed maximum , which was rapid ( @xmath102 days according to @xcite ) . while some photometric @xcite and spectroscopic @xcite observations were obtained during decline , there have been no published observations of the object in quiescence . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure [ fig5 ] , shows a nearly complete shell of size @xmath103 ( with a surface brightness of @xmath104 ) ; the object is too faint to yield a reliable profile fit . radial velocity measurements made shortly after discovery gave an average @xmath32 of @xmath105 km / s @xcite . previous estimates place v3888 sgr at a distance of 3.5 kpc @xcite to @xmath106 kpc @xcite , based on photometric and spectroscopic evidence . our derived distance , based on a @xmath32 of 1300 km / s , is 2.5 kpc . the galactic extinction program of @xcite yields a value @xmath107 , however , @xcite argue for a value @xmath108 . the observed apparent maximum magnitude , @xmath109 , is likely @xmath110 below the true maximum , as indicated from the spectroscopic appearance of the nova . if @xmath111 is used , the observed absolute magnitude , @xmath112 would point at a slow nova with @xmath113 . in this case , the absolute magnitude at minimum , @xmath114 , appears to be unusually faint . if the second value , @xmath108 is used , the observed absolute magnitude , @xmath115 , yields an extrapolated maximum luminosity which assigns v3888 sgr to the group of fast novae ( an assumption that also entered the derivation of the reddening value of @xcite ) . the absolute magnitude at minimum , @xmath116 , would be in better agreement with other novae ( this result was also used in table [ tbl-6 ] ) . thus , either the galactic extinction program underestimates the reddening value , or the exnova is indeed unusually faint ( e.g. the exnova lies in the period gap ) . nq vul was a moderately fast nova that has been well - studied . the light curve is somewhat peculiar ( see the compilation by @xcite ) ; the delayed maximum of @xmath117 ( with a scatter of 0.25 ) is followed by a short , deep minimum , so that a derived @xmath4-time of 2.5 days is of no significance : if one disregards this fluctuation , @xmath118 days , @xmath119 days , and @xmath120 . observations by @xcite , obtained in 1993 , revealed a circular shell with an average diameter of @xmath121 , a knot at the northern end , and an inner shell with a diameter of @xmath122 . there is also evidence of a bar - like feature extending across the stellar remnant at a position angle of @xmath123 . a wfpc2 h@xmath0 image obtained in 1997 ( program 7386 ) did not detect the shell to a @xmath53 limiting surface brightness of @xmath124 . however , due to its extremely high resolution , wfpc2 is not efficient at detecting extended , diffuse objects , so the lack of detection is not unexpected . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure [ fig6 ] , reveals an almost circular shell of size @xmath125 , with an average surface brightness of @xmath126 . the northern extension seen by @xcite is detected , and while a bar - like structure is seen , comparison with field stars shows that it is an artifact of the psf subtraction . the shell does not appear in the [ o iii ] @xmath15007 data to a @xmath53 limiting surface brightness of @xmath127 . the absorption lines of nq vul were measured soon after outburst ( @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite ) , and a wide range of expansion velocities are given by these authors . @xcite noted the conspicuous high - velocity systems ; they derived for the principal spectrum an average value @xmath128 , for the diffuse enhanced @xmath129 , and for the orion spectrum @xmath130 km / s . the total half - width at zero intensity of the strong [ o iii ] @xmath15007 and balmer lines is 1150 and 900 km / s , respectively . one year after outburst , @xcite observed a four - peaked structure with components at @xmath131 and @xmath132 km / s , and @xcite derived a @xmath32 of 705 km / s 5 - 6 years after outburst . as usual , the absorption lines have higher velocities than the emission lines , which may indicate a noticeable inclination of the principal part of the shell . the expansion velocity of @xcite may be an acceptable compromise between the absorption and emission velocities measured by @xcite . previous distances estimates place nq vul at a distance of 1.7 kpc @xcite , 1.2 kpc @xcite and @xmath133 kpc @xcite . if we associate the inner shell of @xcite with the slowly expanding material observed by @xcite ( average @xmath32 of the fast components = @xmath134 km / s ) , and the larger shell , as well as our observation , with the material that is evident in the total width of the nebular and balmer lines ( @xmath135 km / s ) , we derive an average distance @xmath136 kpc . the nova polarization @xcite indicates 1.8 kpc . in the following , we adopt the distance of 1.16 kpc . a value of @xmath137 was derived from @xcite , while @xcite find a value of 2.79 from interstellar polarization . we have used @xmath138 in the following . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath139 , @xmath140 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath141 . pw vul was a moderately fast nova @xcite with a well - studied outburst . the light curve is very structured , so that the derivation of reliable decline times is difficult , as noted by @xcite ; we adopt a maximum magnitude @xmath142 , @xmath143 days , @xmath144 days , and @xmath145 . a spectrum of the object , obtained in 1991 by @xcite , shows strong h@xmath0 and [ o iii ] @xmath15007 emission . the shell of pw vul was first detected by @xcite in 1993 , who found a diameter of @xmath146 by examining the radial profile of the object . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure [ fig7 ] , reveals a clearly resolved , circular shell of size @xmath147 , with an average surface brightness of @xmath148 . the shell does not appear in the [ o iii ] data to a @xmath53 limiting surface brightness of @xmath149 . however , a wfpc2 exposure ( program 7386 ) obtained shortly after our observations reveals a faint , diffuse shell of size @xmath150 , considerably smaller than our ground - based observations , with an average surface brightness of @xmath151 . the wfpc2 data is detecting emission `` hidden '' in the ground - based psf , while the ground - based data shows diffuse emission which wfpc2 can not detect . in order to investigate the large difference in shell sizes between the @xcite data and our data , the former authors kindly provided us with a copy of their data . we were able to confirm their radial profile measurement , however a contour plot reveals a shell of size @xmath152 . while this measurement has not been corrected for the intrinsic psf , it does illustrate the difference in determining the shell size from radial profiles ( fwhm ) and from contour plots ( fwzi ) . the expansion velocity was measured by @xcite shortly after outburst to be 1200 km / s . @xcite measured the velocity 9 years after outburst from the structure of the h@xmath0/[n ii ] @xmath16584 profile , and found a much lower value of @xmath153 km / s . we associate the shell found by hst with the material expanding with 470 km / s , and the more extended shell with the `` fuzz '' that expands with 1200 km / s , and obtain a consistent distance of @xmath154 kpc . previous distances estimates ( @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite ) place pw vul at a distance of 1.2 , 1.5 - 3.0 , 1.3 , and 1.6 kpc . the first three determinations use techniques other than expansion parallax ( e.g. interstellar reddening measurements ) , while @xcite adopted a small expansion velocity , in combination with an underestimated shell size , to derive a result which is , nevertheless , in agreement with the others . we adopt a distance of @xmath154 kpc , and an interstellar extinction @xmath155 @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath156 , @xmath157 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath158 . qu vul was a moderately fast nova of the onemg group , which was well studied from the x - ray to the radio . from the visual light curve from the afoev archive , we derive a maximum magnitude @xmath159 , decline times @xmath160 and @xmath161 days , and @xmath162 . radio observations by @xcite first detected the shell about one year after outburst , and yielded a diameter of @xmath163 at an age of 497 days . the first reports of an optical shell were presented by @xcite , who detected a larger radial profile for the nova than for field stars in h@xmath0 , while a continuum image showed no differences . those authors derived a diameter for the shell of @xmath164 in 1994 . @xcite obtained infrared images of the object in 1996 , and found a shell diameter of @xmath165 at @xmath166 , again by comparing the radial profile of the nova with field stars . data was obtained in 1998 with the _ hubble space telescope _ using both the wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) and nicmos ( for details see @xcite program 7381 ) . our measurements of that data reveal shell sizes of @xmath167 at @xmath166 and @xmath168 ( a bright , filled - in ring with an average surface brightness of @xmath169 ) at h@xmath0 . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure [ fig8 ] , reveals a clearly resolved , circular shell of size @xmath26 and an average surface brightness of @xmath170 . the shell may be weakly seen in the [ o iii ] data , with an average surface brightness of @xmath171 ; the radial profile plot clearly shows the presence of the shell . the gross discrepancies in the expansion rates between our data ( based on a resolved shell ) and previous data ( based on radial profiles ) may indicate an over - correction for the intrinsic psf ( hence an underestimation of the shell size ) when determining shell sizes based on profiles . as noted by @xcite , the measurement technique of @xcite is adequate for demonstrating the existence of a shell , but it is not appropriate for determining the shell size , as the technique incorrectly assumes a gaussian profile for the shell , and fails to account for light from the central star . the large discrepancy between the ground - based and hst data may be caused by the fact that the first method traces extended , rapidly moving , low - surface brightness material , while the second one traces dense , clumpy , slowly moving material near the central object . the expansion velocity was measured shortly after outburst to be 790 km / s @xcite and 1200 km / s @xcite . a study of the profiles of the [ o iii ] @xmath15007 and h@xmath0 emission lines in early july , 1985 , by @xcite yielded fwhm values of 1700 and 1360 km / s , respectively ( his fwzi is @xmath172 km / s , the width of the flat - topped section of the [ o iii ] @xmath15007 line 1140 km / s ) . @xcite derived a fwzi value of @xmath173 km / s in 1994 . previous distances estimates , based on expansion parallaxes , place qu vul at distances of 3.6 and 2.6 kpc , respectively , @xcite , while photometric and reddening techniques yield distances of 3.0 kpc @xcite , 1.2 kpc @xcite , and 1.6 kpc @xcite . based on an expansion velocity of 1500 km / s ( the fastest - moving material ) , we derive a distance , based on our observations only , of 1.5 kpc . if the shell - structure of the hst observations is associated with the material that formed the flat - topped structure in the lines observed by @xcite , a distance of 2.0 kpc is derived . averaging these results leads to @xmath174 kpc , in reasonable agreement with estimates based on other methods ( @xmath175 kpc ) . with a distance of 1.75 kpc , and interstellar extinction @xmath176 @xcite , the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath177 , @xmath178 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath179 . v1819 cyg was a slow nova that has been little studied ; see @xcite for observations of the nova in the first two years after outburst . the light curve has been constructed by @xcite , who give @xmath180 ; their @xmath181 value appears to be not reliable . they derived times @xmath182 days and @xmath183 days , respectively , although other authors give different values . we have evaluated the afoev visual light curve , and derive @xmath184 at maximum , @xmath185 and @xmath186 days , and @xmath187 . while no ground - based imaging observations have been reported , a wfpc2 observation ( program 7386 ) in the f658n ( [ n ii]@xmath188 ) filter reveals a marginally resolved shell with a diameter of @xmath189 . our ground - based observations are unable to resolve a shell of that size . @xcite has published a finding chart for the object , but our images ( see figure [ fig9 ] ) have resolved the szkody object into two stars , with the nova being the southeastern object . from low - resolution spectral scans , @xcite derived `` velocity widths '' of @xmath190 km / s . @xcite made spectroscopic observations at moderate dispersion one month after maximum and observed wide emission lines with a `` half - width '' of 1400 km / s ( which we interpret as `` full width at half maximum '' ) , with the principal and diffuse - enhanced absorption components at @xmath191 and @xmath192 km / s . @xcite find a reddening @xmath193 , and an absolute magnitude at maximum @xmath194 from various relationships between maximum magnitude and speed of decline , and derive a distance of @xmath195 kpc . if we assume , in agreement with @xcite , a @xmath196 km / s for the bulk of material , we derive a distance of 7.4 kpc , in good agreement with the above result . this yields an absolute magnitude @xmath197 , @xmath198 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath199 , with the error based on the uncertainty of the extinction only . the much larger value @xmath200 from the galaxy extinction model of @xcite would increase the brightness by @xmath201 . v842 cen was a moderately fast nova ( @xmath202 days , @xmath203 days , @xcite ) , which showed a dust - forming event . observations by @xcite revealed a shell of diameter @xmath204 ( h@xmath0/[n ii ] ) in 1995 . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure [ fig10 ] , reveals an incomplete , circular shell of size @xmath205 , with an average surface brightness of @xmath206 . the shell is also seen in the [ o iii ] data with an average surface brightness of @xmath207 . the expansion velocity was measured by @xcite after recovery from the dust - forming event in may 1988 . the h lines showed a saddle - shaped structure , with the two peaks at @xmath208 and @xmath209 km / s . the line profiles showed broad wings which extended to @xmath210 km / s ( hwzi ) . a study of the emission lines of [ o iii ] @xmath15007 , [ n ii ] @xmath16584 and h@xmath0 by @xcite over the years 19881991 yielded a ` castellated ' profile , whose initially broad wings faded , while two maxima at about @xmath211 and @xmath212 km / s sharpened over that time interval . a high - resolution spectrum of [ o iii ] @xmath15007 , obtained on 1988 july 17 , is shown in @xcite . its maxima are at @xmath213 and @xmath214 . the expansion velocity of the dense regions of the shell is thus @xmath215 km / s , while low - density material with @xmath216 km / s is also present . based on an expansion velocity of 525 km / s , @xcite derived a distance of @xmath217 kpc . the size of the shell in our data is inconsistent with the size in @xcite , and our distance of 0.42 kpc falls way below their value . the reddening - based distances of 0.9 kpc @xcite and 1.0 kpc @xcite tend to favor the larger distance . if we assume that the value of @xcite is correct , the expansion velocity of the shell observed by us is 1600 km / s , in reasonable agreement with the velocity of the material that caused the broad wings observed in the first years following the outburst . @xcite gave a light curve with a maximum magnitude @xmath218 , and @xmath219 ; @xmath220 is @xmath221 . a somewhat revised expansion rate and velocity of the shell observed by @xcite leads to a distance of 1.15 kpc , and the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath222 ( using the error estimate of the above authors ) , and @xmath223 , with the same error bars . the nova has not yet returned to minimum light . qv vul was a moderately fast nova , which was studied spectroscopically by @xcite . the afoev visual light curve yields @xmath224 at maximum , @xmath225 days , @xmath226 days , and @xmath227 . while no ground - based imaging observations have been reported , data was obtained in 1998 with the _ hubble space telescope _ using both the wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) and nicmos ( program 7381 ) . our measurements of that data reveal shell sizes of @xmath228 at @xmath166 , and @xmath229 at [ n ii]@xmath188 ( with an average surface brightness of @xmath230 ) . we failed to detect a shell in our ground - based images ( to @xmath53 limiting surface brightnesses of @xmath231 at h@xmath0 and @xmath232 at [ o iii ] ) . there is no published finding chart of the quiescent object , so we show , in figure [ fig9 ] , our h@xmath0 on - band and off - band images , which clearly identify the nova . an analysis of the shapes of [ o iii ] @xmath15007 and [ n ii ] @xmath16584 , observed in 1989 by @xcite , yields expansion ( hwhm ) velocities of @xmath233 and @xmath234 , respectively . based on an averaged hwhm velocity of the [ o iii ] @xmath15007 and [ n ii ] @xmath16584 lines , @xmath235 km / s , we derive a distance to qv vul of 2.7 kpc . @xcite gave a value of @xmath236 . for a distance of 2.7 kpc , the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath237 , @xmath238 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath179 . v351 pup was a moderately fast nova which reached a maximum of at least @xmath239 , with @xmath240 days , @xmath241 days , and @xmath242 , as based on the aavso visual light curve @xcite . its outburst was studied in detail as part of the tololo nova survey @xcite . a marginal ground - based detection of a shell ( diameter @xmath243 ) was reported by @xcite . data was obtained in 1998 with the _ hubble space telescope _ using the wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) , and our measurement of that data reveals a h@xmath0 shell @xmath244 in diameter , and an average surface brightness of @xmath245 . our ground - based observations , shown in figure [ fig11 ] , do not show any indication of a shell in the psf - subtracted images . however , in the radial profile , the h@xmath0 data does show that the nova ( fhwm = 4.37 pixels ) is broader than field stars ( @xmath246 pixels ) , while the off - band image does not show any broadening of the nova profile . the expansion velocity quoted by @xcite , 2000 km / s , is based on iue spectra . a detailed analysis of the mg ii 2800 line , based on high - resolution iue spectra , resulted in an expansion velocity of 1200 km / s @xcite . the expansion rate is about @xmath247/yr , based on the ground - based and hst observations . if the expansion velocity of the mg ii 2800 line is assumed to be representative for the shell , a distance of @xmath248 kpc is derived ; the higher velocities quoted by @xcite would lead to a distance around 4 kpc . maximum light is poorly covered by observations . @xcite derived a reddening @xmath249 from recombination lines . the distance of 2.7 kpc leads to @xmath250 , while the distance of 4 kpc @xcite results in @xmath251 ; the values of @xmath252 are @xmath253 and @xmath254 , respectively . we will accept the average values as uncertain , but reasonable , estimates . the nova has not yet returned to minimum light . v1974 cyg was a moderately fast nova , which has been extensively studied . the afoev visual light curve yields @xmath255 at maximum , @xmath256 days , @xmath257 days , and @xmath258 . the first report of a visible shell was by @xcite , who used the faint object camera ( foc ) on _ hubble space telescope _ 467 days after outburst to detect a circular , inhomogeneous ring of diameter @xmath37 in the f278 m ( mg ii ) filter ; this observation was further analyzed by @xcite and they found the shell to be @xmath259 in size . further foc observations @xcite at [ o iii ] @xmath15007 ( f501n ) were obtained at 690 and 818 days after outburst , and revealed shells sizes of @xmath260 and @xmath261 , respectively . @xcite detected extended h@xmath0 emission around the object ( 3 - 4 ) in 1994 - 1995 , which they attribute to excitation of the interstellar medium by uv photons from the outburst . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure [ fig12 ] , reveals a complete , circular shell of size @xmath262 , with an average surface brightness of @xmath263 . the shell is also seen in the [ o iii ] data , with an average surface brightness of @xmath264 . further _ hubble space telescope _ observations were obtained in 1998 using both the wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) and nicmos ( program 7381 ) . our measurements of that data reveal shell sizes of @xmath265 at @xmath166 , and @xmath266 ( a bright ring with an average surface brightness of @xmath267 ) at h@xmath0 . the expansion velocity for v1974 cyg was determined by several authors to be 1100 km / s @xcite , 1500 km / s @xcite , 830 - 895 km / s @xcite , and 700 - 950 km / s @xcite . previous distances estimates , based on expansion parallaxes from early radio @xcite and _ hubble space telescope _ observations ( @xcite , @xcite ) , place v1974 cyg at a distance of @xmath268 kpc . these observations were re - analyzed by @xcite , who revised the distance estimates downward to @xmath269 kpc , using expansion parallaxes based on hst and radio data , and making them more compatible with a distance of 1.8 kpc derived from other techniques ( @xcite , @xcite ) . based on an expansion velocity of 1070 km / s ( which is the average value of the expansion velocities given in the previous paragraph ) , we derive a distance for the _ hubble space telescope _ data of 2.0 kpc . however , if we use our ground - based observations , where we see a clearly resolved shell , we derive a distance of only 310 pc . this discrepancy can be removed in the same way as in the case of v842 cen and other objects . the ground - based observations record faint , fast - moving material , while the hst frames record the bulk of dense clouds that also show up as maxima in the emission lines . if we assume a distance of 1.8 kpc , the extended shell corresponds to an expansion velocity of 5700 km / s . the maximum expansion velocity seen in early p cygni lines of mg ii was 4500 km / s @xcite . the experimentum crucis would be to carry out spatially resolved spectroscopy of the extended optical shell to see the velocity splitting . we will adopt a distance of @xmath270 kpc , based on chochol s detailed study , and an @xmath271 @xcite , so that @xmath272 , and @xmath273 . the nova has not yet returned to minimum light . hy lup was discovered as a star of magnitude @xmath274 by @xcite , and has been little studied since . a spectrum taken by the discoverer indicated that the nova was already some days after maximum . photometry from the aavso archives @xcite reveals @xmath275 days . while no ground - based observations have been reported since shortly after outburst , a wfpc2 observation ( program 7386 ) in the f656n ( h@xmath0 ) filter reveals a marginally resolved shell with a diameter of @xmath189 . our ground - based observations are unable to resolve a shell of that size . there is no published finding chart of the quiescent object , so we show , in figure [ fig9 ] , our h@xmath0 on - band and off - band images , which clearly identify the nova . the expansion velocity for hy lup was measured immediately after discovery by @xcite to be 2700 km / s . a spectrum taken three years after outburst shows the object in the nebular stage ; the emission lines of h@xmath276 , [ o i ] and [ o iii ] appear double - peaked , with a separation of @xmath277 km / s and a fwhm of 340 km / s of the single components @xcite . there are no previous distances estimates for hy lup . based on an expansion velocity of 400 km / s , we derive a distance of 1.8 kpc . this estimate is based solely on _ hubble space telescope _ data , under the assumption that it shows slow - moving material . if the _ hubble space telescope _ data also images fainter , faster material , a larger velocity ( up to 2700 km / s ) would result in a much larger distance . the galactic extinction model yields a value @xmath278 . the resulting absolute magnitude is @xmath279 , but the expansion velocity and the apparent magnitude may both be lower limits , so that the absolute magnitude is likely some magnitudes brighter . the nova has not yet returned to minimum light . it can not be used for maximum or minimum luminosity determinations , unless additional observations become available . cp cru was a fast nova ( @xmath280 days , based on data from vsnet ) , which showed strong he ii emission @xcite , making it a member of the he / n class @xcite . its maximum observed magnitude was @xmath281 , but true maximum may easily have been missed . while no ground - based imaging observations have been reported , data was obtained in 1998 with the _ hubble space telescope _ using the wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) , and our measurement of that data reveals a h@xmath0 shell with a size @xmath282 . our ground - based observations are unable to resolve a shell of that size . there is no published finding chart of the quiescent object , so we show , in figure [ fig9 ] , our h@xmath0 on - band and off - band images , which clearly identify the nova . the expansion velocity for cp cru has measured shortly after outburst by @xcite to be @xmath283 km / s there are no previous distances estimate for cp cru . based on the expansion velocity of 2000 km / s , a distance of 3.2 kpc is derived . as with hy lup ( also with only _ hubble space telescope _ data ) , this distance may be an overestimate to the true value . the galactic extinction model yields a value @xmath284 . the resulting absolute magnitude is @xmath285 , which is also an indication that the true maximum was missed . the nova has not yet returned to minimum light . it can not be used for maximum or minimum luminosity determinations , unless additional observations become available . we failed to detect a shell around 15 objects , which are listed in table [ tbl-4 ] . three of the objects ( gq mus , v827 her , and v838 her ) were also observed with wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) , and no shell was detected . a shell around gq mus was also not detected in ground - based data by @xcite . four objects v868 cen , by cir , v4361 sgr , and n sco 97 do not have published finding charts , and we show , in figure [ fig13 ] , our h@xmath0 on - band and off - band images , which clearly identify the quiescent object . @xcite have identified a new candidate for v2104 oph based on positional coincidence ( the field in the atlas of @xcite is blank ) , and our image ( figure [ fig13 ] ) shows a faint ( @xmath286 ) object , slightly h@xmath0 bright , at the nominal position ( which is identical to the @xcite candidate ) ; the coordinates of our candidate are @xmath287 and @xmath288 as measured from our image . v888 cen does not have a published chart , while @xcite identifies candidates for v3645 sgr and n car 1972 . our observations of v888 cen reveal that the marked object ( the southern object of a close pair ) is h@xmath0 bright , while for the latter two objects , there are no h@xmath0 -bright candidates ( see figure [ fig13 ] ) . our observations of n car 1971 ( not shown ) show a blank field at the nominal position of the object . however , examination of archival material @xcite shows that the object was not detected on a direct plate obtained 2 days after the discovery spectrum . thus , this object is likely an emulsion defect , and also calls into question the reality of n car 1972 , which was found in a similar manner to n car 1971 . @xcite noted a correlation ( at the @xmath289 confidence level ) between speed class ( @xmath5 ) and the axial ratio of nova shells . such a correlation is not unexpected , as the effects of common - envelope evolution thought to occur during outbursts can remove varying amounts of angular momentum from the system depending on the length of time spent in this phase . we have added our dataset to that of @xcite ( for the three objects in common , we have averaged our ratio with theirs ) , and show , in figure [ fig14 ] , the merged plot . we have fit a second - order polynomial to the data , and find that the data is correlated at the @xmath290 level . however , the fit is driven by 3 objects ( dq her , t aur , and rr pic ) , so the reality of the correlation is still quite speculative . in the previous section , distances to several well - investigated and new novae , and their absolute magnitudes , were derived . we can use these absolute magnitudes , in conjunction with the @xmath4 and @xmath5 times , to investigate a maximum magnitude - rate of decline ( mmrd ) relationship . there is no generally accepted light curve decline parameter ; some authors prefer @xmath4 , to extend the mmrd to faint , extragalactic novae , but the fluctuations of the light curve at maximum can easily reach @xmath291 . the value of @xmath5 is much more stable in this respect . nevertheless , we will derive mmrd relations for both parameters . another difference is the use of the @xmath18 ( or visual ) or the @xmath17 ( or photographic ) light curve to derive the value of @xmath292 . since novae are reddest at maximum , @xmath293 should be larger than @xmath294 . this is generally the case , but the general uncertainty of pinning down the time and magnitude of maximum is so large that errors in using the `` wrong '' color band are almost negligible . since visual or @xmath18 magnitudes are nowadays more common than blue magnitudes ( which were in the past often derived from photographic sky surveys ) , we will restrict our analysis on @xmath18 magnitudes ( see also section 5.3 ) . we have enhanced our sample of objects by adding expansion parallax results from other authors . for these objects , a critical evaluation on assumed light curve data , expansion velocities and extinction values was made . the most complete light curve of t aur is based on harvard photographs , which show @xmath295 at maximum , @xmath296 days , @xmath297 days , and @xmath298 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath299 kpc , and @xcite derived an @xmath20 value of @xmath300 . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath301 , @xmath302 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath158 . the visual light curve was compiled by @xcite : @xmath303 at maximum , @xmath304 days , @xmath305 days , and @xmath306 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath307 kpc , and @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath308 . the absolute magnitude is @xmath309 @xmath310 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath311 . the brightest nova of the 20th century reached @xmath312 at maximum . a detailed visual light curve @xcite gives single data , and different averaged data points . these yield different decline rates , and we adopt here @xmath313 at maximum , @xmath314 days , @xmath315 days , and @xmath316 . a value of @xmath44 of @xmath317 was derived by @xcite . the expansion rate was determined by @xcite to be @xmath318/yr , with an indication that the rate decreases with time . with an expansion velocity between @xmath319 km / s , a distance of @xmath320 kpc is derived . the absolute magnitude is @xmath321 , @xmath322 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath48 . the nova reached at maximum @xmath323 . a light curve by @xcite yields @xmath324 days , @xmath325 days , and @xmath326 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath327 kpc , and a value of @xmath328 was calculated from the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath329 , @xmath330 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath331 . the visual light curve , compiled by @xcite , reached @xmath332 , and has @xmath333 days , @xmath334 days , and @xmath335 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath336 kpc from the ring geometry and projection effects of the velocities . they assume an inclination angle of @xmath337 , and from the projected velocity of @xmath338 km , they arrive at an intrinsic velocity of 850 km / s . we derived a projected velocity of 405 km / s , an expansion rate of @xmath339/yr , and at a distance of 0.58 kpc , in good agreement with @xcite . @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath340 . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath341 , @xmath342 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath343 . the photographic light curve , based on harvard photographs , reached @xmath344 , and has @xmath345 days , @xmath346 days , and @xmath347 . @xcite derived an expansion rate of @xmath348/yr , and estimated an expansion velocity of 650 km / s , which yield a distance of 3.5 kpc . a value of @xmath349 was derived from the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath350 , and @xmath351 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath352 . a visual light curve , compiled by @xcite , reached @xmath353 , and has @xmath354 days , @xmath355 days , and @xmath356 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath357 kpc . a careful study of @xcite , based on nebular slit spectra taken in the 1970s , yields a distance of @xmath358 kpc , while other recent determinations , as quoted by @xcite , yield values near @xmath359 kpc . we adopt the result of @xcite . @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath360 , which is based on the strength of the 2200 band and is a good average of other determinations . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath361 , @xmath362 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath141 . a visual light curve , compiled by @xcite , reached @xmath363 , and has @xmath364 days , @xmath365 days , and @xmath366 . @xcite derived a distance of 1.35 kpc , while @xcite derived an @xmath20 value of @xmath300 . the galactic extinction model of @xcite yields a value which is three times higher . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath367 , @xmath368 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath158 . all these values might be brighter by more than @xmath369 if the extinction value based on uv spectroscopy is in error . maximum light was missed for this object . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath370 kpc , in perfect agreement with an earlier result by @xcite . @xcite derived a value of @xmath371 . the observed maximum magnitude is @xmath372 , confirming the fact that the nova was discovered long after maximum light . the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath373 . a photographic light curve is based on observations of ahnert , which are scattered over various issues of the beobachtungs - zirkular of the astronomische nachrichten . it reached @xmath374 , and has @xmath375 days , @xmath376 days , and @xmath377 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath378 kpc , and a value of @xmath379 is based on the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath380 , @xmath381 . the magnitude at minimum is uncertain ( @xmath382 ) , and the absolute magnitude is about @xmath383 . a photographic light curve , based on sonneberg and harvard plates , peaks at @xmath384 , and has @xmath385 , @xmath386 days , and @xmath387 . the nebular expansion parallax of @xcite yields a distance of 5.9 kpc , and a value @xmath388 is based on the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath389 , @xmath390 . @xcite derived @xmath391 as minimum magnitude , the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath158 . this nova fits nicely into the mmrd relations ( see below ) . @xcite had assumed an @xmath20 of @xmath392 , which is unlikely because of the fairly blue color of the postnova . her result , @xmath393 , was taken by @xcite as evidence for including it in a hypothetical class of super - bright novae . a photographic light curve is based on observations by @xcite . maximum is poorly covered : an observation of @xmath394 belongs to the rising branch of the light curve . two days later , a poor observation gave @xmath395 : , and in the following days , the nova declined smoothly by @xmath396/day . fitting the light curve of a fast nova through the points leads to a maximum magnitude @xmath397 . the light curve has @xmath398 days , @xmath399 days , and @xmath400 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath401 kpc , in good agreement with @xcite , and a value of @xmath402 was derived from the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath403 , @xmath404 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath405 . the nova reached a maximum of about @xmath406 . a photographic light curve , compiled by @xcite , reached @xmath407 on 1960 march 4 . outburst maximum is poorly covered by observations ; according to @xcite , spectroscopic evidence indicates that the real maximum of @xmath408 was reached on march 1 . this assumption yields @xmath304 days , @xmath409 days , and @xmath410 . @xcite derived a distance of 1.35 kpc , and a value of @xmath411 was derived by @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath412 , @xmath413 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath331 ( quiescent light is superimposed by dwarf - nova like outbursts ) . a photographic observation near maximum has @xmath414 . follow - on observations were compiled by @xcite , and we derive @xmath415 days , @xmath416 days , and @xmath417 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath418 kpc , based on a @xmath419 km / s as given by @xcite . @xcite , using @xmath420 km / s , as determined from outburst spectra , derived a distance of 1.32 kpc . since nebular expansion velocities may suffer inclination effects ( see our discussion for cp pup ) , the latter value appears more likely . indeed recent observations by @xcite found a present - day @xmath421 km / s and a new distance estimate of @xmath422 kpc . @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath423 , and @xcite a value @xmath424 . the new results lead to an absolute magnitude at maximum @xmath425 , @xmath47 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath352 . a photoelectric light curve was compiled by @xcite . the nova reached @xmath426 , and has @xmath427 days , @xmath346 days , and @xmath428 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath429 kpc , and a value of @xmath430 was derived from the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath431 , @xmath432 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath433 . a light curve was published by @xcite . maximum was approximately @xmath434 , @xmath435 days , @xmath436 : days , and @xmath437 for the photographic v light curve . @xcite analyzed the stellar profile and the structure of the h@xmath0 + [ n ii ] @xmath16584 -blend , and derived an annual expansion rate of @xmath438/yr , an expansion velocity of 750 km / s , an average @xmath44 value of @xmath439 , and a distance of @xmath440 kpc . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath441 , @xmath442 . since the postnova is a close optical triple star , no accurate absolute magnitude at minimum can be given . a photoelectric light curve was compiled by @xcite . the nova reached @xmath426 , and has @xmath443 days , @xmath444 days , and @xmath445 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath446 kpc , in good agreement with determinations of @xmath447 kpc ( @xcite ) and @xmath448 kpc ( @xcite ) . new hst and ground - based observations @xcite yield a distance of @xmath449 kpc . adopting this result and the @xmath450 of @xcite , we arrive at an absolute magnitude at maximum of @xmath451 , @xmath452 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath453 . a photoelectric light curve was compiled by @xcite . the nova reached @xmath454 , and has @xmath455 days , @xmath456 days , and @xmath457 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath458 kpc , which is in good agreement with a previous estimate by @xcite . the @xmath459 was taken from @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath460 , @xmath461 , and the absolute magnitude at postoutburst minimum is @xmath462 . the results of the preceding sections are summarized in table [ tbl-5 ] . some novae are only well - observed photographically , and the @xmath463 and @xmath464 need to be transformed into the @xmath18 system . @xcite find that novae at maximum have an intrinsic @xmath465 . a sample of nine objects with trustworthy reddening indicates a similar value , @xmath466 . the very fast nova v1500 cyg is much bluer at maximum ( @xmath467 ) , but the objects considered here are all fairly slow , and were corrected using the value @xmath468 . since novae become bluer in later stages , we have assumed @xmath469 . table [ tbl-5 ] also give the spectroscopic types of novae according to the classification of @xcite ( he / n , fe ii , and `` hybrid '' objects marked as fe / he / n ) , the light curve types ( a , ao , b , c , d ) , as defined by @xcite , and mentions , for some recent objects , whether an object is a onemg nova . the mmrd relations are shown in figures [ fig15 ] , [ fig16 ] , and [ fig17 ] . most of the fast , bright objects with smooth `` a - type '' light curves are he / n novae or hybrid objects , i.e. fe ii novae that evolve into he / n novae . the three fastest pure fe ii novae are v476 cyg , dk lac and v351 pup ; they also show type a light curves , but their @xmath5 times are between 15 and 30 days , larger than those of he / n or hybrid novae ( @xmath470 days ) . there appears to be no luminosity difference between the he / n novae and the fe ii novae , the only possible feature seems to be the relative faintness of the ` hybrid ' objects relative to the ` pure ' ones . all novae with structured light curves ( types b , c , d ) have @xmath471 days , and they are , likely without exception , fe ii novae . the onemg novae are thought to originate on massive white dwarfs , although their luminosities appear to be consistent than the other novae of a comparable rate of decline . the three objects in our diagram show light curve types a or b , and their @xmath5 times lie between 25 and 50 days . if one sticks to the `` classical '' mmrd relations which hold for the ensemble of points , the following statements can be made : using the @xmath5 time as the lightcurve parameter , the relation appears almost linear , @xmath472 a similar relation results when using the @xmath4 time as the lightcurve parameter : @xmath473 in both cases , the residual for a single object is about @xmath474 , and a linear equation appears to be a good fit to the data . the most recent fit of this type is by @xcite : @xmath475 who , after selecting a `` high quality sample '' and correcting the other novae accordingly , was able to reduce the dispersion to @xmath476 . it should be noted that a restriction on a near , less reddened sample , or a correction of absolute magnitudes at maximum by assuming that @xmath477 for all objects , as done by cohen , does not lead to a decisive improvement of the scatter in our data set , and thus we refrain from any correction which may introduce systematic effects . at an average @xmath478 days , cohen s calibration is @xmath479 fainter than ours . another classical relation uses a specific stretched s - shaped curve , which is apparent in samples of extragalactic novae . it was first suggested by @xcite , and was recently revised by @xcite . we have adopted their turn - over point , but have re - determined the zero - point and the amplitude : @xmath480 our zero - point is almost identical to that of @xcite , but the `` contrast '' between bright and faint novae has increased from @xmath481 to @xmath482 . a possible explanation is that in the extragalactic sample of @xcite , very bright and fast novae of the v1500 cyg and cp pup - type appear fainter because of insufficient sampling time , and the faintest among the slow novae are missed ( malmquist bias ) . finally , it was shown by @xcite that the absolute ( pg ) magnitude 15 days after outburst is similar for novae of all speed classes . @xcite derived for 11 objects @xmath483 , while we obtain for 28 objects : @xmath484 indicating a similar zero - point difference ( @xmath485 ) between cohen s and our sample . a regression shows that there is absolutely no trend in @xmath252 versus , e.g. , @xmath5-time , however , the standard deviation ( @xmath486 ) is quite large . there is one more way to look at the mmrd relation , if one takes the light curve type as a second parameter . the dichotomy between the a / ao `` super - eddington '' and bcd `` eddington '' groups , introduced in the investigation by @xcite , appears well expressed . the ( @xmath487 ) diagram can be divided in two fields : the a / ao group has @xmath488 and @xmath489 , the bcd group has @xmath490 and @xmath491 ( two poorly investigated objects , v500 aql and xx tau , may have poorly determined luminosities and/or decline times , and are not considered in the following discussion ) . in the ( @xmath492 ) diagram , the two groups are separated as well ; the dividing line in time is now at @xmath493 . if one examines the `` super - eddington '' and `` eddington '' groups separately , mmrd relations are quite weakly expressed ; in the @xmath492 diagram , the a / ao group follows the relation @xmath494 with a correlation coefficient of 0.61 . the bcd group shows only a weak correlation coefficient of 0.21 between magnitude and decline time ; @xmath495 . a linear relation for these objects is : @xmath496 in the @xmath487 diagram , the a / ao group follows the relation @xmath497 with a correlation coefficient of 0.45 , and the bcd group yields @xmath498 with a correlation coefficient of 0.46 ( of course , the @xmath499 is the same ) . such a type of fit in two separate regions mimics the stretched s - shaped curve used for a fit of the complete sample , but in the present case we have a criterion ( the light curve form ) to separate two regions , and to use different linear relations ( or simple averages ) in them . the overall scatter in the mmrd relation which is of the order of @xmath500 in all these relations may indicate the presence of hidden second order parameters ( spectroscopic type , light curve type , mass of underlying white dwarf ) which should influence the luminosity . however , the individual errors are too large , so the sample is not able to indicate which parameter is most decisive . thus , the mmrd relation can be used as a reliable distance indicator only in a statistical way ; for a single object , the absolute magnitude can be off by @xmath501 . if samples are taken from different stellar populations , systematic luminosity differences may be present . this does not devaluate the use of novae as distance indicators , it simply means that caution must be used when such relations are applied ( similar problems occur in other distance indicators like supernovae , cepheids , and rr lyrae stars ) . a better understanding of the mmrd relation is also the basis of a better understanding of the physics of nova eruptions . another result of our study is the derivation of absolute magnitudes of classical novae after eruption . table [ tbl-6 ] lists the absolute visual magnitudes of novae , which have settled to a more or less constant minimum brightness . some of the objects have known orbital periods and inclination angles ; relevant data were taken from the catalog of @xcite , and these magnitudes @xmath502 were corrected for inclination effects , using the formula given by @xcite ; the corrected magnitudes @xmath503 are also listed . all novae for which no inclination information was available , were corrected by assuming an average inclination @xmath504 . recent results on orbital periods are available for v500 aql @xcite and v446 her and v533 her @xcite . in addition to the nova data , absolute magnitudes of dwarf novae at maximum , based on hst fgs parallaxes , and of novalike stars , mainly based on hipparcos parallaxes , were derived ( the absolute magnitudes supersede those given by @xcite ) . results are summarized in fig . [ fig18 ] . if one discards novae in or below the period gap ( cp pup , rw umi , qu vul ) and the long - period system gk per , as well as the peculiar novalike ae aqr , the remaining systems ( with @xmath505 < -0.4 $ ] ) indicate a dependence of absolute magnitude on period : @xmath506\ ] ] ( correlation coefficient 0.47 ) . if the period ( in hours ) is used , the relation is @xmath507\ ] ] which , at @xmath508 hours , yields absolute magnitudes which are @xmath509 brighter than those predicted @xcite s formula for dwarf novae at maximum . summing up , no obvious separation of absolute magnitudes of objects belonging to different groups ( novae at minimum , dwarf novae at outburst , and novalike systems at normal light ) can be seen . this again shows the intimate connection of these groups , which is also obvious from space density considerations , and the hibernation scenario , which indicates that only by including novalike stars and dwarf novae to the space densities of novae , realistic recurrence times of novae can be obtained @xcite . we have obtained optical imaging of 30 recent novae , and have detected shells , in combination with _ hubble space telescope _ data , for 14 objects . we fail to detect the previously observed shell around rw umi , while pw vul , v1974 cyg , and v842 cen appear to show two distinct shells . expansion parallaxes for the novae have been derived , and combined with revised distances for other novae , have been used to derive absolute magnitudes . a study of various maximum magnitude - rate of decline relations is in general agreement with previous `` linear '' determinations . however , a relation making use of the light curve type may yield a somewhat better fit to the data . it clearly shows the existence of two types of novae : ( 1 ) the fast ( @xmath510 days ) super - eddington novae , which may be he / n , `` hybrid '' fe ii novae , and , if their evolution is somewhat slower , fe ii novae . they all show smooth light curves with well - defined maxima ( a ) , and some of them may show quasi - periodic light oscillations in their later evolution ( ao ) . ( 2 ) the slow @xmath511 days ) eddington - novae with structured light curves ( ba ) , double maxima ( bb ) , standstills at maximum ( ca ) , dust formations at later stages ( ca , cb ) , and long premaximum stages ( d ) , seem to belong exclusively to the fe ii spectroscopic type . the merging of both groups leads to a well - expressed mmrd ; if both groups are considered separately , their mmrds show smaller slopes , and a jump of @xmath512 occurs at @xmath513 days and @xmath514 days . at minimum , most novae have similar magnitudes as those of dwarf novae at maximum light and novalike stars . we wish to thank the aavso for providing data from their international database , which is based on observations submitted to the aavso by variable star observers worldwide , and the afoev for providing data from their internet database . we also thank tim naylor and fred ringwald for providing a copy of their pw vul data , jeff robertson for providing a copy of his v2014 oph data , jack macconnell for investigating the reality of nova car 1971 and 1972 , and pierluigi selvelli for information on interstellar extinction data . hwd also gratefully acknowledges the hospitality and support of space telescope science institute , where he could carry out part of the work on which this investigation is based . we wish to thank an anonymous referee for many useful comments on this manuscript . almr , i. , ills - almr , e. 1966 , mitt . budapest 60 andre , j. 1991 , phd thesis , erlangen - nrnberg university andre , j. , drechsel , h. , snijders , m.a.j . , and cassatella , a. 1991 , , 244 , 111 andre , j. , drechsel , h. , and starrfield , s. 1994 , , 291 , 869 andrillat , y. and houziaux , l. 1989 , , 238 , 29p belle , k.e . , woodward , c. e. , evans , a. , eyres , s. , gehrz , r. d. , schuster , m. , greenhouse , m. a. , krautter , j. , starrfield , s. g. , truran , j. 1999 , , 31 , 977 bergner , y.k . , bondarenko , s.i . , miroshnichenko , a.s . , yudin , r.v . , yutanov , n.y . , kuratov , k.s . , and mukanov , d.b . 1985 , astron . , 1374 bertaud , c. 1945 , ann . paris obs . 9 , fasc . 1 bertaud , c. 1962 , j. obs . , 45 , 321 bowen , i.s . 1956 , , 61 , 336 buscombe , w. , de vaucouleurs , g. 1955 , observatory , 75 , 170 campbell , l. 1903 , harvard ann . , 48 , 39 campbell , l. 1919 , harvard ann . , 81 , 113 ciatti , f. and rosino , l. 1974 , , 16 , 305 chochol , d. , grygar , j. , pribulla , t. , komk , r. , hric , l. , and elkin , v. 1997 , , 318 , 908 chochol , d. , hric , l. , urban , z. , komk , r. , grygar , j. , and papousek , j. 1993 , , 277 , 103 chochol , d. , komk , r. , hric , l. , and grygar , j. 1995 , in cataclysmic variables , ed . a. bianchini et al . , ( dordrecht , kluwer academic publishers ) , p. 153 cohen , j.g . 1985 , , 292 , 90 cohen , j.g . and rosenthal , a.j . 1983 , , 268 , 689 cottrell , m.j . and smith , s.e . 1978 , , 90 , 441 della valle , m. 1991 , , 252 , l9 della valle , m. 1993 , , 5870 della valle , m. and benetti , s. 1996 , , 6532 della valle , m. and duerbeck , h.w . 1993 , , 275 , 239 della valle , m. and livio , m. 1995 , , 452 , 704 della valle , m. , gilmozzi , r. , bianchini , a. , and esenoglu , h. 1997 , , 325 , 1151 drechsel , h. , rahe , j. , duerbeck , h.w . , kohoutek , l. , and seitter , w. 1977 , , 30 , 323 duerbeck , h.w . 1981 , , 93 , 165 duerbeck , h.w . 1987a , , 131 , 461 duerbeck , h.w . 1987b , , 45 , 1 duerbeck , h.w . 1987c , the messenger ( eso ) , 50 , 8 duerbeck , h.w . 1992 , acta astron . , 42 , 85 duerbeck , h.w . 1996 , in light curves of variable stars a pictorial atlas , ed . c. sterken and c. jaschek , ( cambridge , cambridge university press ) , p. 134 duerbeck , h.w . 1999 , ibvs , 4731 duerbeck , h.w . and covarrubias , r. 1995 , in iau coll . 151 , flares and flashes , eds . j. greiner et al . , ( berlin , springer ) , p. 264 duerbeck , h.w . and zwitter , t. 2000 , in preparation duerbeck , h.w . , geffert , m. , nelles , b. , dmmler , r. , and nolte , m. 1984 , ibvs , 2641 duerbeck , h.w . , shara , m.m . , leibowitz , e.m . , and seitter , w.c . 2000 , in preparation gaposchkin , s. 1946 , harvard bull . , 918 gehrz , r.d . , grasdalen , g.l . , and hackwell , j.a . 1985 , , 298 , l47 gill , c.d . and obrien , t.j . 1998 , , 300 , 221 gill , c.d . and obrien , t.j . 2000 , , 314 , 175 gilmozzi , r. , selvelli , p. , cassatella , a. 1994 , , 65 , 199 gratton , l. 1953 , , 118 , 568 haefner , r. 1999 , ibvs , 4706 hakkila , j. , myers , j.m . , stidham , b.j . , hartmann , d.h . 1997 , , 114 , 2043 herbig , g.h . and smak , j.i . 1992 , acta astron . , 42 , 17 hjellming . r.m . 1994 , talk presented at the 184th aas meeting kaluzny , j. and chlebowski , t. 1989 , acta astron . , 39 , 35 kenyon , s.j . and wade , r.a . 1986 , , 98 , 935 klare , g. and wolf , b. 1978 , , 33 , 327 kohoutek , l. 1981 , , 196 , 87p krautter , j. , klare , g. , wolf , b. , duerbeck , h.w . , rahe , j. , vogt , n. , and wargau , w. 1981 , , 102 , 337 kukarkin , b.w . and gitz , h.k . 1937 , astr . su 14 , 220 lance , c.m . , mccall , m.l . and uomoto , a.k . 1988 , , 66 , 151 larsson - leander , g. 1954 , an . stockholm obs . 18 , no . 3 leibowitz , e.m . , wyckoff , s. , and vidal , n.v . 1976 , , 88 , 750 liller , w. 1993 , , 5867 macconnell , d.j . 1999 , private communication malakpur , i. 1975 , , 48 , 403 marsh , t.r . , oke , j.b . , and wade , r.a . 1983 , , 205 , 33p mattei , j. a. , 1999 , observations from the aavso international database , private communication mclaughlin , d.b . 1943 , pub . aas 10 , 310 mclaughlin , d.b . 1960 , in stellar atmospheres , ed . greenstein , ( chicago , university of chicago press ) , p. 585 orio , m. , balman , s. , della valle , m. , gallagher , j. and gelman , h. 1996 , , 466 , 410 pachoulakis , i. and saizar , p. 1995 , in cataclysmic variables , ed . a. bianchini et al . , ( dordrecht , kluwer academic publishers ) , p. 153 paresce , f. 1994 , , 282 , l13 paresce , f. , livio , m. , hack , w. , and korista , k. 1995 , , 299 , 823 pettit , e. 1949 , , 61,41 ringwald , f.a . and naylor , t. 1996 , , 278 , 808 ringwald , f.a . naylor , t. and mukai . k. 1996 , , 281 , 192 ringwald , f.a . , wade , r.a . , orosz , j.a . , and ciardullo , r.b . 1998 , , 30 , 893 ritter , h. and kolb , u. 1998 , , 129 , 83 robb , r.m . and scarfe , c.d . 1995 , , 273 , 347 robertson , j.w . , honeycutt , r.k . , and henden , a.h . 1999 , , 31 , 1247 rosino , l. and iijima , t. 1987 , , 130 , 157 rosino , l. , iijima , t. , rafanelli , p. , radovich , m. , esenoglu , h. and della valle 1996 , , 315 , 463 saizar , p. , starrfield , s. , ferland , g. j. , wagner , r. m. , truran , j. w. , kenyon , s. j. , sparks , w. m. , williams , r. e. , stryker , l. l. 1991 , , 367 , 310 saizar , p. , pachoulakis , i. , shore , s.n . , starrfield , s. , williams , r.e . , rothschild , e. and sonneborn , g. , 1996 , , 279 , 280 sanford , r.f . 1945 , , 102 , 357 satyvaldiev , v. 1963 , byull . an tadj . ssr ( dushanbe ) 36 , 37 seitter , w.c . 1990 , in iau coll . 122 , physics of classical novae , ed . a. cassatella and r. viotti , ( berlin , springer - verlag ) , p. 79 sekiguchi , k. feast , m.w . , fairall , a.p . , winkler , h. 1989 , , 241 , 311 shin , j .- y . , gehrz , r.d . , jones , t.j . , krautter , j. , heidt , j. , and hjellming , r.m . 1998 , , 116 , 1966 shore , s.n . , sonneborn , g. , starrfield , s. , gonzalez - riestra , r. and ake , t.b . 1993 , , 106 , 2408 slavin , a.j . , obrien , t.j . and dunlop , j.s . 1994 , , 266 , l55 slavin , a.j . , obrien , t.j . and dunlop , j.s . 1995 , 276 , 353 soderblom , d. 1976 , , 88 , 517 solf , j. 1983 , , 273 , 647 spencer jones , h. 1931 , ann . 10 szkody , p. 1994 , , 108 , 639 szkody , p. and howell , s.b . 1992 , , 78 , 537 taylor , a.r . , seaquist , e.r . , hollis , j.m . , and pottasch , s.r . 1987 , , 183 , 38 thorstensen , j.r . , and taylor , c.j . 2000 , , 312 , 629 van den bergh , s. and pritchet , c.j . 1986 , , 98 , 110 van den bergh , s. and younger p.f . 1987 , , 70 , 125 verbunt , f. 1987 , , 71 , 339 vogt , n. and maitzen , h.m . 1977 , , 61 , 601 wade , r.a . , ciardullo , r. , jacoby , g.h . , and sharp , n.a . 1991 , , 102 , 1738 wade , r.a . , harlow , j.j.b . , and ciardullo , r. 2000 , , 112 , 614 warner , b. 1987 , , 227,83 warner , b. 1995 , cataclysmic variable stars , ( cambridge , cambridge university press ) , p. 146 williams , r.e . 1982 , , 261 , 170 williams , r.e . 1992 , , 104 , 725 williams , r.e . , phillips , m.m . , and hamuy , m. 1994 , , 90 , 297 whitney , b.a . and clayton , g.c . 1989 , , 98 , 297 wu , c .- c . , panek , r.j . , holm , a.v . , raymond , j.c . , hartmann , l.w . , and swank , j.h . 1989 , , 339 , 443 younger , j.w . 1980 , , 85 , 1233 zakharov , g.p . 1953 , perem . zvezdy , 9 , 175 gq mus & eso dutch-0.9 m & 21 march 1998 & 900s & 1200s & 18.37 + v351 pup & & & 600s & 1200s & 19.55 + hy lup & & & 600s & 1200s & 18.86 + cp cru & & & 600s & 1200s & 19.48 + n car 72 & & & 1200s & & unident . + v365 car & & 22 march 1998 & 600s & & 18.47 + v868 cen & & & 600s & 900s & 19.88 + v888 cen & & & 600s & 900s & 16.38 + cp pup & & & 600s & & 14.99 + v842 cen & & 23 march 1998 & 450s & 600s & 15.82 + v812 cen & & & 600s & 900s & 20.44 + by cir & & & 450s & 600s & 15.86 + v4361 sgr & & & 180s & 180s & 16.85 + n sco 97 & & & 180s & 180s & 17.58 + cp pup & & & & 1200s & + n car 71 & & & 900s & & unident . + + rw umi & kpno-2.1 m & 28 may 1998 & 1050s & 1050s & 18.95 + v827 her & & & 720s & 600s & 18.08 + hr del & & & 60s & 60s & 12.16 + v1819 cyg & & & & 600s & 20.33 + + ct ser & & 29 may 1998 & 1050s & 1050s & - + v794 oph & & & 1050s & 1050s & - + v838 her & & & 660s & 900s & 19.07 + qv vul & & & 660s & 900s & 18.61 + v1819 cyg & & & 660s & & + v1974 cyg & & 31 may 1998 & 660s & 660s & 16.06 + pw vul & & & & 360s & 17.51 + v2104 oph & & & 3600s & 2700s & 20.50 + v3888 sgr & & 01 june 1998 & 3600s & & 20.96 + v3645 sgr & & & 150s & & unident . + nq vul & & & 660s & 600s & 17.70 + pw vul & & & 360s & & + + qu vul & kpno-0.9 m & 30 june 1998 & 1550s & 1800s & 18.31 + cp pup ( 1942.86 ) & d & 16.9 & 1998.23 & 0 & 815 & 12 + & d & 16.0 & 1995.75 & 1 & + & d & 13.4 & 1987.20 & 24 & + ct ser ( 1948.27 ) & d & @xmath515 & 1998.23 & 0 & 535 & 8 + rw umi ( 1956.73 ) & & not seen & 1998.41 & 0 & 950 & 11 + & & not seen & 1997.98 & 1 & + & d & 3.0 & 1993.69 & 27 & + & r & 2.0 & 1983.5 & 11 & + hr del ( 1967.52 ) & d & @xmath516 & 1998.41 & 0 & 470,540 & 32,34 + & d & @xmath517 & 1997.40 & 1 & 520,560 & 8,35 + & d & @xmath518 & 1993.69 & 27 & + & d & 5.5 & 1992.58 & 7 & + & d & @xmath519 & 1981.33 & 13 & + v3888 sgr ( 1974.76 ) & d & @xmath520 & 1998.41 & 0 & 1300 & 22 + nq vul ( 1976.81 ) & d & @xmath521 & 1998.41 & 0 & 1300,1700 & 15,16 + & & not seen & 1997.92 & 1 & 950,705 & 14,8 + & d & 8 & 1993.69 & 27 & + pw vul ( 1984.57 ) & d & @xmath522 & 1998.79 & 1 & 1200,470 & 17,3 + & d & @xmath523 & 1998.41 & 0 & + & r & 1.1 & 1993.64 & 3 & + qu vul ( 1984.99 ) & d & @xmath524 & 1998.71 & 1,6 & 790,1200 & 19,26 + & d & @xmath525 & 1998.50 & 0 & 570,1190 & 37,4 + & d & @xmath526 & 1998.18 & 2 + & r & 0.8 & 1996.35 & 5 + & r & 1.9 & 1994.52 & 4 & + & d & @xmath527 & 1986.34 & 26 & + v1819 cyg ( 1986.57 ) & d & @xmath528 & 1999.18 & 1 & 600 & 38 + & & not seen & 1998.41 & 0 & 700 & 39 + v842 cen ( 1986.89 ) & d & @xmath529 & 1998.23 & 0 & 535 & 23 + & d & 1.6 & 1995.15 & 10 & 525 & 33 + qv vul ( 1987.87 ) & d & @xmath530 & 1998.95 & 1 & 515 & 37 + & & visible & 1998.95 & 1 & + & d & @xmath531 & 1998.62 & 2 + & & not seen & 1998.41 & 0 & + v351 pup ( 1991.99 ) & d & 1.3 & 1998.23 & 1,6 & 2000 & 36 + & & visible & 1998.12 & 0 & 1200 & 40 + & r & 0.58 & 1995.17 & 36 & + v1974 cyg ( 1992.14 ) & d & @xmath532 & 1998.41 & 0 & 825,1100 & 9,20 + & d & @xmath533 & 1998.12 & 1 & 1500,860 & 21,28 + & d & @xmath534 & 1998.11 & 2 + & d & @xmath535 & 1994.38 & 30 + & d & @xmath536 & 1994.03 & 30 + & d & @xmath537 & 1993.41 & 31 + hy lup ( 1993.71 ) & d & @xmath528 & 1999.12 & 1 & 2700,400 & 25,18 + & & not seen & 1998.23 & 0 + cp cru ( 1996.65 ) & d & @xmath538 & 1998.91 & 1,6 & 2000 & 29 + & & not seen & 1998.23 & 0 + cp pup & 55.37 & 815 & 0.153 & 1120 + & 52.89 & & 0.151 & 1140 + & 44.34 & & 0.151 & 1140 + ct ser & 49.96 & 535 & 0.079 & 1430 + rw umi & 36.96 & 950 & 0.037 & 4900 + & 26.8 & & 0.041 & 5400 + hr del & 30.89 & 525 & 0.149 & 750 + & 29.88 & & 0.146 & 760 + & 26.17 & & 0.220 & 505 + & 25.06 & & 0.110 & 1010 + & 13.81 & & 0.134 & 825 + v3888 sgr & 23.65 & 1300 & 0.110 & 2495 + nq vul & 21.60 & 1025 & 0.169 & 1280 + & 16.88 & 1025 & 0.237 & 910 + & 16.88 & 545 & 0.090 & 1280 + pw vul & 14.22 & 470 & 0.053 & 1880 + & 13.84 & 1200 & 0.145 & 1750 + & 9.07 & 470 & 0.061 & 1635 + qu vul & 13.72 & 570 & 0.060 & 2005 + & 13.51 & 1500 & 0.207 & 1530 + v1819 cyg & 12.61 & 700 & 0.020 & 7385 + v842 cen & 11.34 & ( 1600 ) & 0.255 & ( 1325 ) + & 8.26 & 525 & 0.097 & 1140 + qv vul & 11.08 & 515 & 0.041 & 2675 + v351 pup & 6.24 & 1200 & 0.100 & 2530 + & 3.18 & & 0.091 & 2775 + v1974 cyg & 6.27 & ( 4500 ) & 0.718 & ( 1320 ) + & 2.24 & 1060 & 0.112 & 2000 + & 1.89 & & 0.106 & 2115 + & 1.30 & & 0.115 & 1940 + hy lup & 5.41 & 400 & 0.046 & 1800 + cp cru & 2.26 & 2000 & 0.133 & 3180 + v794 oph & 1939.45 & 58.78 & 4.95 + v365 car & 1948.74 & 49.49 & 52.2 + v812 cen & 1973.25 & 24.98 & 69.0 + v2104 oph & 1976.76 & 21.68 & 0.44 + gq mus & 1983.05 & 15.18 & 26.4 2.57 + v827 her & 1987.05 & 12.41 & 0.86 1.32 + v838 her & 1991.23 & 7.18 & 2.05 1.17 + v868 cen & 1991.25 & 6.98 & 32.1 + by cir & 1995.07 & 3.16 & + v888 cen & 1995.15 & 3.08 & + v4361 sgr & 1996.53 & 1.70 & + n sco 1997 & 1997.43 & 0.80 & + v500 aql & he ? & ao & 17 & 42 & 0.118 & @xmath539 & @xmath540 & pg + v603 aql & hy & ao & 4 & 9 & 0.500 & @xmath541 & @xmath542 & + v1229 aql & fe & b ? & 20 & 38 & 0.100 & @xmath543 & @xmath542 & + t aur & fe & ca & 45 & 50 & 0.044 & @xmath544 & @xmath545 & pg + v842 cen & fe & cb & 35 & 48 & 0.057 & @xmath546 & @xmath547 & + v450 cyg & fe & ca & 88 & 108 & 0.023 & @xmath548 & @xmath549 & + v476 cyg & fe & a & 6 & 15 & 0.333 & @xmath550 & @xmath551 & + v1500 cyg & hy & a & 2.4 & 3.7 & 1.111 & @xmath552 & @xmath553 & + v1819 cyg & fe & bb & 37 & 89 & 0.054 & @xmath544 & @xmath554 & + v1974 cyg & fe & ba & 17 & 37 & 0.125 & @xmath555 & @xmath556 & onemg + hr del & fe & d & 172 & 230 & 0.012 & @xmath557 & @xmath558 & + dq her & fe & ca & 39 & 86 & 0.051 & @xmath559 & @xmath560 & + v446 her & he & a & 7 & 11.5 & 0.426 & @xmath561 & @xmath254 & pg + v533 her & fe & ba & 22 & 46 & 0.091 & @xmath562 & @xmath563 & + cp lac & hy & a & 5.3 & 9.8 & 0.377 & @xmath564 & @xmath565 & + dk lac & fe & ao ? & 11 & 24 & 0.182 & @xmath566 & @xmath567 & + gk per & he & ao & 7 & 13 & 0.286 & @xmath568 & @xmath549 & + rr pic & fe & d & 20 & 127 & 0.100 & @xmath569 & @xmath570 & + cp pup & he & a & 6 & 8 & 0.333 & @xmath552 & @xmath563 & + v351 pup & fe & a & 10 & 26 & 0.200 & @xmath571 & @xmath563 & onemg + fh ser & fe & cb & 42 & 59 & 0.048 & @xmath572 & @xmath573 & + xx tau & fe & cb & 24 & 43 & 0.083 & @xmath574 & @xmath575 & pg + rw umi & ? & ba & 48 & 88 & 0.042 & @xmath576 & @xmath577 & pg + lv vul & fe & ba & 21 & 43 & 0.095 & @xmath578 & @xmath579 & + nq vul & fe & bb & 23 & 53 & 0.087 & @xmath580 & @xmath581 & + pw vul & fe & bb & 82 & 126 & 0.024 & @xmath582 & @xmath583 & + qu vul & fe & ba & 22 & 49 & 0.091 & @xmath584 & @xmath585 & onemg + qv vul & fe & cb & 50 & 53 & 0.040 & @xmath586 & @xmath587 & + v500 aql & 0.1452 & 19.25 & 5.9 & @xmath588 & 4.50 & & 4.85 & novae + v603 aql & 0.1381 & 11.70 & 0.33 & @xmath589 & 3.90 & 17 . & 4.80 & at minimum + v1229 aql & & & 2.1 & @xmath590 & & & & + t aur & 0.2044 & 15.03 & 0.96 & @xmath591 & 4.50 & 57 . & 4.45 & + v842 cen & & 15.82 & 1.15 & @xmath592 & & & & + v450 cyg & & 19 . & 3.5 & @xmath593 & 5 . : & & 5.4 & + v476 cyg & & 17.70 & 1.62 & @xmath594 & 5.85 & & 6.20 & + v1500 cyg & 0.1396 & 17.42 & 1.5 & @xmath595 & 4.95 & ? & 5.35 & + v1819 cyg & & 20.33 & 7.4 & @xmath596 & 4.90 & & 5.25 & + hr del & 0.2142 & 12.16 & 0.76 & @xmath597 & 2.30 & 40 . & 2.80 & + dq her & 0.1936 & 14.38 & 0.48 & @xmath598 & 5.30 & 86.5 & 2.70 & + v446 her & 0.2071 & 17.61 & 1.35 & @xmath599 & 5.85 & & 6.20 & + v533 her & 0.1471 & 15.06 & 1.25 & @xmath600 & 4.60 & ? & 4.95 & + cp lac & & 15.80 & 1.35 & @xmath591 & 4.50 & & 4.90 & + dk lac & & 16.75 & 3.9 & @xmath601 & 2.40 & & 2.75 & + bt mon & 0.3338 & 15.59 & 1.8 & @xmath602 & 3.85 & 82 & 1.90 & + gk per & 1.9968 & 13.01 & 0.455 & @xmath603 & 3.75 & @xmath604&4.15 & + rr pic & 0.1450 & 12.50 & 0.58 & @xmath605 & 3.55 & 65 & 3.45 & + cp pup & 0.0614 & 14.99 & 1.7 & @xmath606 & 3.90 & 40 : & 4.45 & + v351 pup & & 19.55 & & @xmath607 & & & & + v3888 sgr & & 20.96 & 2.5 & @xmath608 & 5.75 & & 6.15 & + ct ser & 0.1950 & 16.14 & 1.4 & @xmath609 & 5.40 & & 5.75 & + fh ser & & 16.97 & 0.95 & @xmath610 & 5.05 & & 5.45 & + xx tau & & 18.58 & 3.5 & @xmath611 & 4.60 & & 4.95 & + rw umi & 0.079 & 18.95 & 5 & @xmath612 & 5.15 & & 5.55 & + lv vul & & 15.90 & 0.92 & @xmath613 & 4.35 & & 4.70 & + nq vul & & 17.70 & 1.16 & @xmath614 & 5.30 & & 5.65 & + pw vul & 0.2137 & 17.51 & 1.8 & @xmath615 & 4.50 & & 4.85 & + qu vul & 0.1118 & 18.31 & 1.75 & @xmath616 & 5.20 & & 5.55 & + qv vul & & 18.61 & 2.7 & @xmath617 & 5.20 & & 5.55 & + + ss aur & 0.1828 & 10.5 & 0.20 & @xmath618 & 3.80 & 38 & 4.40 & dwarf novae + ss cyg & 0.2751 & 8.7 & 0.166 & @xmath619 & 2.47 & 38 & 3.05 & at maximum + u gem & 0.1729 & 9.8 & 0.096 & @xmath620 & 4.62 & 70 & 3.90 & + + ae aqr & 0.4117 & 11.5 & 0.102 & @xmath621 & 6.26 & 58 & 6.20 & novalike + v3885 sgr & 0.2163 & 10.3 & 0.11 & @xmath622 & 5.01 & @xmath623 & 5.40&variables + rw sex & 0.2451 & 10.6 & 0.29 & @xmath624 & 3.24 & 34 & 3.90 & + ix vel & 0.1939 & 9.6 & 0.096 & @xmath625 & 4.40 & 60 & 4.25 & + Abstract:
[ "an optical imaging study of recent 30 novae has been undertaken using both ground - based and space - based observations . resolved shells have been detected around 9 objects in the ground - based data , while another four objects have shells detected by _ hubble space telescope _ observations ; for rw umi , we fail to detect a shell which was observed five years earlier . images in h@xmath0 , and when appropriate [ o iii ] @xmath15007 , are shown , and finding charts for novae without shells are given if no published chart is available . expansion parallaxes for all systems with shells are derived , and absolute magnitudes for a total of 28 objects are presented , along with a discussion of the maximum magnitude - rate of decline relation . we find that separate linear fits for fast and slow novae may be a better representation of the data than a single , global fit . at minimum , most novae have similar magnitudes as those of dwarf novae at maximum and novalike stars ." ]
19,007
19,007
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: binary stars matter in astronomy in many different ways : as calibrators of various stellar properties , as tracers of star formation , and as hosts to diverse astrophysical phenomena such as mass transfer , circumstellar and circumbinary discs , or dynamical resonances , to name a few . knowledge of orbital elements is needed in these applications . however , only a small fraction of known visual binaries have known orbits , mostly because of orbital periods being much longer than the time covered by observations . even known orbits are not always reliable for the same reason : lack of sufficient data . we report here a large set of binary - star measurements made at the 4.1-m southern astrophysical research telescope ( soar ) with the speckle camera . this paper continues the previous series published by ( * ? ? ? * hereafter tmh10 ) , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , and ( * ? ? ? * hereafter tmh14 ) . our primary goal is improvement of known orbital elements and determination of new orbits . the emphasis is placed on close and nearby pairs resolvable at soar , where orbital periods are measured in years rather than decades or centuries . the orbits of these fast binaries can be computed or improved only after a few years of speckle - interferometry monitoring . many orbits were already computed for the first time or improved using data obtained during previous speckle runs . an `` orbit optimizer '' was used now to select binaries where observations in the coming three years could potentially yield noticeable orbit improvement . the second , overlapping program is the characterization of multiplicity of solar - type stars within 67pc ( the fg-67 sample , * ? ? ? * ) . by resolving known binaries with astrometric acceleration @xcite or variable radial velocity ( rv ) , we obtain estimates of their periods and mass ratios and lay a foundation for future orbit determination . the spectroscopic discoveries are mostly furnished by the geneva - copenhagen survey of ( * ? ? ? * hereafter gcs ) . on the other hand , by observing relatively wide binaries with separations up to 3 we constrain the existence of subsystems around their components . several such subsystems are discovered here . in addition , we have now specially targeted distant physical secondary components to the main fg-67 stars , looking for subsystems . this work @xcite complements the large survey of the northern sky done with robo - ao @xcite and shows that subsystems in the secondary components are as frequent as in the main components . in this paper we also observed _ hipparcos _ binaries within 200pc with southern declinations , so far largely neglected . these observations allow us to evaluate orbital motion and to find a subset of `` fast movers '' for further monitoring . some nearby tight binaries from _ hipparcos _ were monitored from the outset of the soar speckle program . this strategy of focusing on fast binaries has resulted in several new orbits , with more still to come . our approach for this program was therefore similar and complementary to that of the speckle program active at the wiyn 3.5-m telescope at kitt peak in recent years ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? to date , that program has resolved over 150 close companions from the _ hipparcos _ list . we re - observed some close ( hopefully , fast ) pairs resolved at the blanco telescope in 2008 . some of them moved substantially in 6 years , and may yield first orbits . as a `` filler '' , several neglected pairs were also measured or found unresolved . this paper is structured as follows . section [ sec : obs ] describes briefly the instrument and data processing and gives an estimate of data consistency for the whole series of measurements at soar . the results are presented in section [ sec : res ] in the form of data tables with comments on the newly resolved pairs and multiple systems . in section [ sec : orb ] , the new and revised orbits are given , and section [ sec : concl ] concludes the paper . the observations reported here were obtained with the _ high - resolution camera _ ( hrcam ) a fast imager designed to work at the 4.1-m soar telescope @xcite . for practical reasons , the camera was mounted on the soar adaptive module ( sam , * ? ? ? however , the laser guide star of sam was not used ; the deformable mirror of sam was passively flattened and the images are seeing - limited . the sam module corrects for atmospheric dispersion and helps to calibrate the pixel scale and orientation of hrcam , as explained in tmh14 . the transmission curves of hrcam filters are given in the instrument manual . we used mostly the strmgren @xmath0 filter ( 543/22 nm ) and the near - infrared @xmath1 filter ( 788/132 nm ) . the response curve of the latter was re - defined as a product of the filter transmission and detector response furnished by the respective manufacturers . the electron multiplication ccd ( em ccd ) luca - s used in hrcam failed in 2014 july . it was sent to its manufacturer ( andor ) for repair and received back in 2014 december . for the two runs in the fall of 2014 , we used the em ccd luca - r , kindly loaned by g. cecil . it has a larger format of 1004@xmath21002 pixels , with smaller pixels of 8@xmath3 m compared to luca - s ( 658@xmath2496 , 10@xmath3 m pixels ) . the second lens in hrcam was replaced by the achromatic doublet of 75-mm focal length to get the pixel scale of 14.33mas . the detector software driver was also upgraded on this occasion . although the two luca cameras look exactly the same and come from the same manufacturer , their ccds are radically different . luca - s uses a line - transfer ccd , while luca - r has a frame - transfer ccd . we found that luca - r had poor charge transfer efficiency ( cte ) in the vertical direction . weak signals such as cosmic - ray hits and dark current from hot pixels are smeared vertically over @xmath4 5 pixels , while strong signals are transferred with less spread . this results in the signal - dependent loss of resolution in the vertical direction ( along ccd columns ) , which was accounted for in the data processing by an additional adjustable parameter . this problem was revealed unexpectedly during the 2014 october run . in the next run , we placed stars closer to the line register , improving slightly the vertical cte by reducing the number of charge transfers . we studied the distribution of the bias signal of both cameras . it is very well modeled by the sum of a gaussian component ( readout noise ) and a negative exponent that corresponds to the single - electron events amplified stochastically by the gain register . most events are generated by the ccd clocking ( clock - induced charge , cic ) typical for em ccds . the width ( decrement ) of the exponential term depends on the em gain . the rate of cic events is found as the ratio of the areas below these two terms . for luca - r , the readout noise is 4.5 analog - to - digital units ( adu ) and the cic rate is 0.03 . the cic events are not smeared vertically because no charge transfer is involved . for luca - s , the readout noise is 9 adu , the exponential decrement is 30 adu ( for the gain setting of 200 used here ) , and the rate of cic events is 0.13 per pixel . about half of the cic events are removed by the threshold of 17 adu applied in the power - spectrum calculation . the soar telescope suffers from 50-hz vibration ( see tmh14 ) . the vibrations are non - stationary , causing variable loss of resolution if the 20-ms exposure time is used . most data were taken with an exposure of 5ms , sampling 1/4 of the vibration period . the resolution is then recovered and the effect of vibrations becomes less dramatic . it disappears completely at an exposure time of 2ms , used on the brightest targets . with such short exposures , the power spectra extend to the cutoff frequency and are very symmetric . the luca - r detector suffering from the cte problem was used mostly with a 10-ms exposure as a compromise between vibrations and poor cte at low signal levels . the observations consist of taking a cube of 400 images of 200@xmath2200 pixels each . for binaries wider than 15 , the 400@xmath2400 format was used . each object and filter combination is normally recorded twice , these data are processed independently , and the result is averaged . we used 2@xmath22 detector binning on the faintest targets observed in the @xmath1 filter , with a minor under - sampling and loss of resolution . measurements of binaries made with and without binning agree well mutually . faint red dwarfs with @xmath5 still produced useful data . the observing time for this program was allocated through noao ( proposals 2013b-0172 , 2014a-0038 , 2014b-0019 , 8 nights total ) and by the chilean national tac ( proposal cn2014b-27 , 4 nights ) . l l r r r 1 & 2014 jan 15 - 16,22 & 1.26 & 15.23 & 309 + 2 & 2014 mar 7 - 8 & @xmath6 & 15.23 & 201 + 3 & 2014 apr 19 - 20 & @xmath7 & 15.23 & 385 + 4 & 2014 oct 5 - 7 & @xmath8 & 14.33 & 553 + 5 & 2014 nov 7 - 8 & 0.66 & 14.33 & 253 + 6 & 2015 jan 10 - 11 & @xmath90.20 & 15.23 & 248 + table [ tab : runs ] lists the observing runs , the calibration parameters ( position angle offset @xmath10 and pixel scale in mas ) , and the number of objects covered in each run . the calibration of angle and scale was done by referencing to the sam imager , as described in tmh14 . run 1 was affected by transparent clouds . two hours on 2014 jan 22 were added as a backup program . during this run , the nasmyth rotator of soar had a large offset of + 2.8@xmath11 . the seeing was mediocre to poor . the instrument was not dismounted between runs 1 and 2 , but the nasmyth rotator was re - initialized , explaining the difference in @xmath10 . the sky was clear , and two hours were added on march 7 as a backup from other program . the sky was also clear on the two nights of run 3 , with seeing good to excellent . runs 4 and 5 used the substitute detector luca - r and were affected by the cte problem . for this reason the observations were performed mostly in the @xmath1 filter with 10-ms exposure . all three nights of run 4 were clear , and mostly with good seeing ( the median full width at half maximum , fwhm , of re - centered average images was 060 , the best fwhm was around 045 ) . the detector was removed between runs 4 and 5 in an attempt to improve the cte by tuning the electronic parameters ; however , this turned out to be impossible . during run 5 , the seeing varied from average to poor . in the worst case , the star did not fit in the 3 field , illuminating all pixels . in such cases , the image is truncated , the power spectrum contains bright vertical and horizontal lines , and the detection limits are poor . under poor seeing , data obtained with the 400-pixel field and 2@xmath22 binning are of better quality , without image truncation . the two nights of run 6 were clear , with seeing average to poor . the hrcam was returned to its original configuration with the luca - s detector . measurements with the sam internal light source confirmed that the pixel scale did not change compared to runs 13 . the data processing is described in tmh10 . as a first step , power spectra and average re - centered images are calculated from the data cubes . the auto - correlation functions ( acfs ) are computed from the power spectra . they are used to detect companions and to evaluate the detection limits . the parameters of binary and triple stars are determined by fitting the power spectrum to its model , which is a product of the binary ( or triple ) star spectrum and the reference spectrum . we used as a reference the azimuthally - averaged spectrum of the target itself in the case of binaries wider than 01 . for closer pairs , the `` synthetic '' reference was used ( see tmh10 ) . the signal - dependent vertical smearing of the image caused by the cte problem required a modification of the reference spectrum . we model the smearing by an additional gaussian term in the reference spectrum @xmath12 : @xmath13 where @xmath14 and @xmath15 are spatial frequency coordinates along ccd lines and columns respectively , @xmath16 is the diffraction - limited transfer function , @xmath17 is the cutoff frequency , @xmath18 , @xmath19 and @xmath20 describe the speckle signal attenuation ( both are negative , @xmath19 is related to seeing ) , and the new parameter @xmath21 is the fwhm of the cte smear in the column direction in pixels . this `` elliptical '' synthetic reference was used for all binaries , both wide and close , observed in runs 4 and 5 . the parameters of the reference @xmath22 were fitted to the power spectrum jointly with the binary parameters @xmath23 . in the case of close binaries , the parameters of the elliptical reference and of the binary itself are mutually correlated , so the resulting measures could be biased . the close binary star b 430 ( _ 19155@xmath92515 _ ) was observed with position angles of the instrument differing by @xmath24 . the `` fringes '' in the power spectrum had different orientation relative to the ccd . however , the binary parameters @xmath25 fitted to these power spectra are mutually consistent , ( 2837 , 00673 , 0.785 ) and ( 2850 , 00690 , 0.722 ) . therefore , the cte effect is , to first order , accounted for by the modified reference model . still , measurements of close binaries from runs 4 and 5 ( 2014.77 and 2014.86 ) should be taken with some caution . wide binaries resolvable in the re - centered long - exposure images are processed by another code that fits only the magnitude difference @xmath26 , using the binary position from speckle processing . this procedure corrects the bias on @xmath27 caused by speckle anisoplanatism and establishes the correct quadrant ( flag * in the data table ) . for run 5 , we also calculated shift - and - add ( saa or `` lucky '' ) images , centered on the brightest pixel in each frame and weighted proportionally to the intensity of that pixel . all frames without rejection were co - added . binary companions , except the closest and the faintest ones , are detectable in these saa images , helping to identify the correct quadrant . such cases are marked by the flag q in the data table . quadrants of the remaining binary stars are guessed based on prior data or orbits , not measured directly . calibration of scale and angular offset in speckle interferometry is challenging because the accuracy of modern measurements with 4-m telescopes exceeds the accuracy of even the best orbits . comparison with ephemerides is useful only as a sanity check . recognizing this problem , we observed several wide binaries during each run . their motions are slow and can be modeled by linear functions of time . these models can then be used to check the calibration of the archival data . this approach tests only the mutual consistency of speckle runs , rather than absolute calibration of the whole data set . we selected 41 binaries wider than 05 that do not contain resolved subsystems and were observed during at least 4 runs each . the angle and separation of each binary is approximated by linear functions of time . if the fitted slope is less than twice its rms error , a zero slope is assumed . deviations from these models are interpreted as calibration corrections . for each run , they are median - averaged . we then iterate by fitting new linear models corrected for the run s systematics , determining new calibration parameters of the runs , etc . figure [ fig : cal ] shows the offsets in angle and scale determined by this procedure for those of 26 runs where at least @xmath28 calibrators were observed . run 0 refers to observations at the blanco telescope in 2008.5 ( tmh10 ) . runs 16 in this paper correspond to numbers 2126 in the plot . vertical bars show the rms scatter between calibrators ( not errors of the mean , which are smaller by @xmath29 ) . a typical rms scatter is 01 in angle and 0.3% in scale . this analysis reveals good mutual consistency of @xmath45000 speckle measurements produced by hrcam to date . the largest systematics are found in runs 10 and 11 ( 2011.9 and 2012.1 ) . the published data can be corrected by subtracting the angular offsets found here and dividing the separations by the new scale factors . we plan to observe more calibrators and publish improved systematic corrections in the future . the data of this paper rely only on the original instrument calibrations and _ are not corrected _ for the offsets found so far . this study gives an estimate of the accuracy of speckle measurements . after correction for run systematics , the median rms deviations from the models for the 41 calibrator binaries are 01 in angle and 1.9mas in separation . the actual errors should be a factor of @xmath41.5 larger ( @xmath43mas ) , considering that the number of independent measurements is about twice the number of fitted parameters . this study will be repeated in the future with additional speckle runs and calibrators . the data tables have almost the same format as in the previous papers of this series . they are available in full only electronically . table 2 lists 1636 measures of 1218 resolved binary stars and subsystems , including 56 newly resolved pairs . the columns of table 2 contain ( 1 ) the wds @xcite designation , ( 2 ) the `` discoverer designation '' as adopted in the wds , ( 3 ) an alternative name , mostly from the _ hipparcos _ catalog , ( 4 ) besselian epoch of observation , ( 5 ) filter , ( 6 ) number of averaged individual data cubes , ( 7,8 ) position angle @xmath30 in degrees and internal measurement error in tangential direction @xmath31 in mas , ( 9,10 ) separation @xmath32 in arcseconds and its internal error @xmath33 in mas , and ( 11 ) magnitude difference @xmath26 . an asterisk follows if @xmath27 and the true quadrant are determined from the resolved long - exposure image ; a colon indicates that the data are noisy and @xmath26 is likely over - estimated ( see tmh10 for details ) ; the flag q " means the quadrant is determined from the saa image . note that in the cases of multiple stars , the positions and photometry refer to the pairings between individual stars , not the photo - centers of subsystems . for stars with known orbital elements , columns ( 1214 ) of table 2 list the residuals to the ephemeris position and code of reference to the orbit adopted in the sixth catalog ( * ? ? ? * hereafter vb6 ) . new and revised orbits computed in this work ( section [ sec : orb ] ) are referenced as `` this work '' . we did not use image reconstruction and measured the position angles modulo @xmath34 ( except the saa images in run 5 ) . plausible quadrants are assigned on the basis of orbits or prior observations , but they can be changed if required by orbit calculation . for triple stars , however , _ both _ quadrants of inner and outer binaries have to be changed simultaneously ; usually the slowly - moving outer pair defines the quadrant of the inner subsystem without ambiguity . table 3 contains the data on 441 unresolved stars , some of which are listed as binaries in the wds or resolved here in other filters . columns ( 1 ) through ( 6 ) are the same as in table 2 , although column ( 2 ) also includes other names for objects without discoverer designations . for stars that do not have entries in the wds , fictitious wds - style codes based on the position are listed in column ( 1 ) . column ( 8) is the estimated resolution limit , the largest of the diffraction radius @xmath35 and the vertical cte smear @xmath21 ( applicable to runs 4 and 5 only ) . columns ( 8,9 ) give the @xmath36 detection limits @xmath37 at @xmath38 and @xmath39 separations determined by the procedure described in tmh10 ( please note that this is not the resolution of the observations ) . when two or more data cubes are processed , the largest @xmath27 value is listed . the last column marks by colons noisy data mostly associated with faint stars . in such cases , the quoted @xmath26 might be too large ( optimistic ) ; however , the information that these stars were observed and no companions were found is still useful for statistics @xcite . table 4 lists 56 newly resolved pairs . the last two columns of table 4 contain the spectral type ( as given in simbad or estimated from absolute magnitude ) and the _ hipparcos _ parallax ( * ? ? ? * hereafter hip2 ) . fragments of acfs of newly resolved triple systems are shown in figure [ fig : acf ] . we comment on the newly resolved binaries below . the following abbreviations are used : pm proper motion , cpm common proper motion , rv radial velocity , sb1 and sb2 single- and double - lined spectroscopic binaries , int4 - 4th interferometric catalog @xcite.4040 ( tok 412 ac ) was independently discovered by sana et al . ( 2014 , apjs , 215 , 15 ) and is designated in the wds as sna 60 ac . by error , the newly discovered close companion in 04308@xmath95727 ( tok 429 aa , ab ) was omitted from table 4 , figure 2 and section 3.2 , but its measurements are found in table 2 . ] _ 01379@xmath98259 . _ hip 7601 is a nearby ( 27pc ) dwarf also known as gj 67.1 or hr 512 . according to @xcite , it is a young spectroscopic triple detected in x - rays ( 1rxs j013755.4@xmath9825838 ) . gcs also recognized the star as sb2 . spectroscopic monitoring ( tokovinin , in preparation ) shows that all three components are similar stars of approximately one solar mass . here we resolved the outer subsystem ab and observed its fast motion . in fact it was already resolved at soar on 2011.036 at 2210 and 0044 , but this low - quality observation has not been published . the available data indicate that the period of ab is 1.35years ; the pair completed nearly two revolutions since its first resolution in 2011 . _ _ hip 10096 is sb2 according to gcs . the separation corresponds to a period of @xmath45yr . _ 03046@xmath95119 . _ hip 14307 and 14313 form the 38 pair dun 10 ab belonging to the fg-67 sample . the component b is resolved here at 019 . the estimated period of ba , bb is @xmath425yr . no motion is seen in 2 months . the subsystem ba , bb is also manifested by asymmetric line profiles ( tokovinin , in preparation ) . the a component has never been observed at high angular resolution . _ 04386 - 0921 . _ hip 21265 is an x - ray source and an sb2 according to gcs ( one observation only ) . it is resolved here at 56mas , which corresponds to a period of @xmath45yr . _ 04469 - 6036 . _ first resolution of hip 22229 at 0043 , @xmath40 . the measure is uncertain , but the elongation is confirmed with 2-ms exposure and is not seen in other observed stars , so it is not caused by vibration . this is a triple system containing an eclipsing binary al dor of algol type with an eccentric orbit @xcite . the separation implies an orbital period of the outer system on the order of 5yr . _ _ this is hip 26237 , hd 37018 , hr 1892 , 42 ori , a young star in orion which has not been observed at high angular resolution so far , according to int4 . we resolved the known binary ab = da 4 and discovered the spectacular subsystem aa , ab at 016 ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . _ _ hip 30995 is an sb2 according to gcs . the new companion at 02 with @xmath41 mag is unlikely to correspond to the sb2 , so the system is probably triple . _ 06497 - 7433 . _ hip 32735 has an acceleration detected in hip2 , but no rv data . the resolved 03 pair implies a period of @xmath480yr . the spectral type k0iv given in simbad may be inaccurate because the luminosity and color of the components correspond to main sequence stars with masses of 1.0 and 0.6 @xmath42 . _ _ the 02 pair hds 947 had not been observed since its discovery by _ it is revealed as a triple system ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) with comparable separations between components . hds 947 probably corresponds to ab , while the fainter c component is new . _ 07038 - 4334 . _ hip 34052 = hd 53680 = hip 34065c = gj 264 is a spectroscopic and astrometric binary for which @xcite give an orbit with @xmath43d = 4.62yr and an estimated semi - major axis of 015 . there is also an astrometric orbit @xcite with @xmath44yr that predicts @xmath45 for the moment of our first observation . the binary is resolved at 023 , @xmath46mag and shows some orbital motion . the binary makes a quadruple system together with components a and b ( gj 264.1 and 264 ) that form a 205 pair at 185 from c. the b component was also observed here and found unresolved . _ 07294 - 1500 _ is another nearby multiple system . the main component hip 36395 is a visual binary with a known 728-yr orbit , also measured here . the c component ( nltt 17952 ) at 204 is physical , and yet another cpm component f is found at 1072 @xcite , while the wds components d and e are optical . we observed c and resolved it at 009 . the orbital period of ca , cb is on the order of 6yr , estimated masses are 0.6 and 0.4 @xmath42 . we also targeted f and did not resolve it . the magnitudes and colors of c and f are quite similar . _ 07304 + 1352 _ is a quadruple system . the 77 pair ab ( stf 1102 ) is hip 36485 , the cpm component d = hip 36497 = hd 59450 is located at 112 from it , while the wds components c and e are optical . the physical nature of ad is established by common pm , distance , and rv . d is a known sb1 with @xmath47d=7.4yr @xcite and an estimated semi - major axis of 93mas , also an acceleration binary . we resolved the da , db pair at 011 , @xmath48=2.6 . the minimum mass of db derived from its sb orbit is 0.27 @xmath42 , while we estimate the masses of da and db as 1.05 and 0.6 @xmath49 from their luminosity . a previous non - resolution of d is reported in int4 ; it was also unresolved with robo - ao @xcite . _ 07312 + 0210 , _ hip 36557 = hd 59688 . according to observations by d. latham ( 2012 , private communication ) , this is a spectroscopic triple with an inner period of 70d ( double - lined , also detected by gcs , mass ratio 0.7 ) and an outer period of 2007d or 5.5yr . the outer system is also detected by astrometric acceleration @xcite . we resolve it here at 0057 , @xmath48=2.0 , @xmath21=2.5 mag , and see the orbital motion . the estimated mass of ab is 0.88 @xmath42 . the semi - major axis of the 70-d inner binary aa , ab is 7mas , so accurate measurements of ab can detect the sub - motion to determine the orientation of the inner orbit . _ 08021 - 1710 . _ this is the high - pm m - dwarf lp 784 - 12 ( hip 39293 ) at 30pc from the sun . a new distant component c was found at 18 in addition to the known pair hds 1140 which closed from 04 in 1991.25 to 033 now ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . it is confirmed as physical by its fixed position during one year , the quadrant of the triple was determined in run 5 . _ 08447 - 2126 . _ like the previous object , the late - type nearby binary hds 1260 was discovered by _ hipparcos _ and is expected to move rapidly ( hip 42910 , bd@xmath50 2665 ) . it was targeted at soar for the first time . to our surprise , the object turned out to be a resolved triple , with the secondary being a 016 pair of equal stars ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . _ hipparcos _ failed to recognize the triple nature of this star . the estimated period of bc is 15yr . the outer pair ab has closed from 08 to 05 and moved in position angle since its discovery . the separations between components are comparable , so this triple system may be interesting dynamically . _ _ hip 46572 is called a `` high proper motion star '' in simbad , although its pm and rv are actually quite moderate . the binary ab has moved little in the 24 years since its resolution by _ we discover the subsystem bc ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) with an estimated period of @xmath4100yr . _ _ hip 48906 is a double - lined binary according to the gcs , first resolved here at 64mas . the period should be @xmath420yr . _ 10056 - 8405 . _ hip 49442 = hd 88948 is a nearby dwarf in the 39 visual binary hj 4310 ab . according to gcs , the rv of the main component a varies by 3.5 km s@xmath51 . here it is resolved into a 018 aa , ab pair with an estimated orbital period of 25yr . no astrometric acceleration was detected , however . the visual secondary b was targeted separately and found unresolved . _ 10070 - 7129 . _ hip 49546 is an astrometric binary of 1.5yr period @xcite with variable rv . the period corresponds to a semi - major axis of 25mas . the star is resolved here tentatively at 26mas ( with 2-ms exposure ) . this resolution is below the diffraction limit and needs confirmation . the measured position angle of @xmath52 is close to @xmath53 predicted by the astrometric orbit . _ 10223 - 1032 . _ hip 50796 is a single - lined and astrometric binary according to @xcite , with period 570.98d ( 1.56yr ) , @xmath54 km s@xmath51 , @xmath55 . the _ hipparcos _ parallax corrected for the binary motion is [email protected] . the spectroscopic secondary companion is over - massive , most likely a close pair of m - dwarfs . if so , the new speckle companion at 166 with a period on the order of 500yr makes the system quadruple . the speckle companion might contribute to the ir excess found by torres . the system is an x - ray source , and is possibly young . _ 10530 + 0458 . _ latham ( 2012 , private communication ) identified hip 5212 = hd 94292 as sb2 with a period of 8.3yr and a highly eccentric orbit . it is resolved here securely at 50mas . _ 12176 + 1427 . _ hip 59933 has a variable rv according to gcs . the 32mas separation corresponds to an orbital period of @xmath42yr . however , the separations in the @xmath0 and @xmath1 filters are somewhat discordant ; further confirmation is needed . _ 12250 - 0414 . _ hip 60574 is a spectroscopic triple with periods 14d and 22yr ( latham , 2012 , private communication ) , also an acceleration binary . we resolved the outer pair at 022 separation , matching the spectroscopic period . the lines of the visual secondary ab could potentially be detected in the spectrum by cross - correlation , leading eventually to a full 3-d orbit . _ 12528 + 1225 . _ hip 62933 ( 41 vir ) was observed on request by f. fekel who studies its spectroscopic orbit . apparently it is resolved for the first time . _ 13132 - 0501 . _ hip 64499 has a variable rv , with a preliminary spectroscopic orbit of 17yr period ( latham 2012 , private communication ) . it is resolved at 01 and shows no motion in one month . _ 13321 - 1115 . _ no previous indication of binarity was available for hip 66018 , apart from the cpm companion b at 84 . we discovered another faint component ab at 089 , @xmath48=4.6 , likely to be physical ( low background density ) . the b component ( @xmath57 ) was targeted , but its speckle signal was weak and no obvious close companions to b were found . _ 13344 - 5931 . _ hip 66230 has a variable rv in the gcs and an astrometric acceleration . we resolved it at 01 , @xmath48=2.5 , estimated period @xmath410yr . the pair moved by @xmath58 in one month . _ 13382 - 2341 . _ hip 66530 has a variable rv according to the gcs . it is resolved at 016 in the @xmath1 band only , estimated period @xmath420yr . this is a triple system , considering the cpm companion b at 28 ( lds 4385 ab ) . _ 13401 - 6033 . _ hip 66676 ( a ) and hd 118735 ( b , g6v , @xmath59 ) at 77 share common pm ( although it is small , 58mas yr@xmath51 ) which , together with photometry , indicates with high probability that it is a physical pair ab @xcite . we targeted the secondary component b and found it to be a resolved triple . the faint star c , at 092 from b , is itself a close 016 pair ca , cb ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . note that this is a region of the sky with very high stellar density , raising suspicion that the ca , cb pair might be a random background object . re - observation of the triple in 2015 ( to be published ) shows , however , that it is physical because the center of c=(ca , cb ) moves relative to b with a speed of 11mas yr@xmath51 ( or 3 km s@xmath51 ) , compatible with the expected orbital motion of bc and much less than the system s pm of 58mas yr@xmath51 . the estimated period of ca , cb is @xmath430 years , the period of bc is @xmath4300 years . _ 13495 - 2621 . _ hip 67458 is a double - lined chromospherically active binary with orbital period of 7.2d ( latham , 2012 , private communication ) . we found a faint tertiary companion at 073 with an estimated orbital period on the order of 100yr . the speckle survey of chromospherically active stars by @xcite did not detect this tertiary , lacking the dynamic range of hrcam . _ 14014 - 3137 . _ hip 68507 is an acceleration binary with a variable rv resolved here at 006 . the period of aa , ab is on the order of 5yr . there is a faint physical companion b at 67 found in 2mass @xcite . another visual companion at 14 , see 195 , is optical , as revealed by its fast relative motion . _ 14382 + 1402 . _ hip 71572 is an acceleration binary without rv data . it is found to be a tight 90-mas pair with a small @xmath26 and an estimated period under 10yr ( some motion is seen in one month ) . very likely it can be studied as a double - lined sb . _ 14464 - 3346 . _ hip 72235b is located at 9 from the primary star and shares its proper motion ( ab = hds 2082 ) . pre - discovery measurements of this _ hipparcos _ pair were published by @xcite . the rv of a may be variable ( latham , 2012 , private communication ) . the star b turns out to be a 04 binary ba , bb with masses of 0.70 and 0.17 @xmath42 estimated from the luminosity . its period is on the order of 100yr . the whole system could thus be quadruple . _ 15362 - 0623 . _ hip 76400 is identified by the gcs as an sb2 with a mass ratio @xmath60 , but there is no spectroscopic orbit available . we resolved the 019 pair with @xmath61=3.9 , indicating a mass ratio of @xmath40.5 and an orbital period of @xmath430yr . very likely the resolved binary does not match the spectroscopic double - lined system . considering the cpm component b at 80 @xcite , this system could be a quadruple with a 3-tier `` 3 + 1 '' hierarchy . _ 15367 - 4208 . _ hip 76435 is a g5v star from the fg-67 sample . its companion c ( ac = fal 78 ) at 135 is physical , while the _ hipparcos _ companion b at 43 is not seen in the 2mass images and has not been confirmed otherwise . we targeted c and resolved it into a close binary . estimated masses of ca and cb are 0.70 and 0.66 @xmath42 , period @xmath44yr . _ 16142 - 5047 . _ hip 79576 has a variable rv ( gcs ) . the 79mas separation implies an orbital period of @xmath45yr . this is the high - pm star ltt 6467 with a low metallicity [ fe / h][email protected] . @xcite found no cpm companions . _ 16195 - 3054 . _ hip 79980 and hip 79979 form a 23 cpm pair ab where the f6iii primary is slightly evolved , while the g1/g2 secondary is closer to the main sequence , but still above it . the _ hipparcos _ parallax of b , @xmath62mas , is obviously wrong , so we assume the parallax of the primary , 20.7mas . the rv(b ) is variable ( gcs ) , and we resolve it into a 40mas pair with an estimated period on the order of 1yr . the pair moved by 10@xmath11 in a month . binary motion is the likely cause of the incorrect _ hipparcos _ parallax . _ 16454 - 7150 . _ hip 82032 is located in a crowded field , so the new faint ab companion found here at 13 could be optical . the star was observed because of its suspected variable rv ( gcs ) , but the newly found companion , even if physical , is too distant to explain this variability . another visual companion b at 115 ( ab = b 2392 ) is optical , as evidenced by its fast relative motion . the star is on the harps exo - planet program . _ 16563 - 4040 . _ hip 82876 is a distant o7v star . the 026 pair ab ( hds 2394 ) was measured among other neglected binaries . we found another faint companion c at 146 ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . the star has an extensive literature , including multiplicity surveys with speckle interferometry and rv @xcite . owing to the large distance , no detectable orbital motion is expected . indeed , the ab pair was measured with hrcam in 2008.5 at the same position as it is now . those observations in the @xmath0 band did not detect the companion c owing to a lower signal - to - noise ratio . _ 17054 - 3346 . _ the rv of hip 83612 varies by 52 km s@xmath51 ( gcs ) . it is a very close pair with an estimated period of @xmath41.5yr , and the measure near the diffraction limit derived from the elongated power spectrum is tentative . the _ hipparcos _ parallax is likely biased by the binary . the visual component b = hip 83609 ( ab = wno 5 ) at 25 is optical . _ 17098 - 1031 . _ hip 83962 = hr 6375 has a variable rv according to the gcs , while gorynya ( 2013 , private communication ) detected double lines . it is resolved tentatively at 33mas with @xmath63 mag ( the 5-ms exposure makes it unlikely that the asymmetry is caused by vibrations ) . the separation corresponds to an orbital period on the order of 1yr , which could bias the _ hipparcos _ parallax . however , @xcite consider the star as single . the new pair was not resolved in 2014.3 ; presumably it became closer . _ _ hip 85342 and hip 85326 form a physical pair ab at 127 separation ( common pm , rv , and parallax ) . the b component = hip 85326 has a variable rv and an astrometric acceleration which could hardly be produced by the 1 speckle companion bb found here , owing to its long estimated period of @xmath4300yr . it seems that b is triple and the whole system is quadruple . this companion bb was not detected in the previous speckle observations because it is red : @xmath64 , @xmath65mag ; its color matches a dwarf star at the same distance as the system . however , the field is crowded and the newly found companion could still be optical . _ 17266 - 3258 . _ hip 85360 is an acceleration and spectroscopic binary . its preliminary spectroscopic period ( latham 2012 , private communication ) corresponds to a semi - major axis of 80mas . the star is chromospherically active and possibly young . the faint companion found here at 116 is most likely optical , as the field is extremely crowded . re - observation within a year will resolve its status . _ 17341 - 0303 . _ hip 85963 has a variable rv and is an acceleration binary . the 91mas separation implies an orbital period of @xmath410yr ; the estimated masses are 1.37 and 0.81 @xmath42 . despite extensive literature ( 51 references in simbad ) , there is no published spectroscopic orbit , while several high - resolution spectroscopic studies addressed the abundance . _ 17342 - 1910 . _ b 1863 is a known close binary which has been unexpectedly found to be a triple ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . the new distant component c is detectable also in the @xmath0 filter , but we measured only the inner binary in @xmath0 . the star was observed at the blanco telescope in 2008.5397 , and the pair actually measured then was ac , at 1338 , 0217 , @xmath66 ( same as now , see table [ tab : new ] ) . the inner pair ab with a smaller @xmath67 was unresolved in 2008.5 , while it is clearly resolved now . owing to the large distance from the sun , we expect only a slow motion , so even the inner pair observed since 1929 may not yet be ready for computing its first orbit . _ 17342 - 5454 . _ hip 85969 has a variable rv according to the gcs and confirmed by @xcite . the 055 separation implies a period on the order of 80yr . the star is on the exo - planet program at the anglo - australian telescope . _ 18243 - 0405 . _ the neglected pair ysc 67 turned out to be a new triple ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . the outer 035 binary ab was known previously , now we detect elongation that implies an inner subsystem aa , ab . we compared with stars in the same area of the sky observed before and after to assure that the elongation is not of instrumental origin ; it is seen in two filters . _ 18267 - 3024 . _ hip 90397 is an acceleration binary with a variable rv ( gcs ) , resolved here at 69mas ( estimated period @xmath44yr ) . the star is targeted by exo - planet programs . _ 18346 - 2734 . _ hip 91075 was noted as a double - lined binary by the gcs ( one observation only ) . the separation of 86mas implies a period of @xmath410yr , while the double - lined observation matches the moderate magnitude difference ( estimated masses 1.04 and 0.77 @xmath49 ) . the star is an x - ray source , so a future combined orbit could determine masses for testing evolutionary models of young stars . the sky around the object is quite crowded ; the 9 companion i 1026 is optical ( it moves too fast ) . _ 19206@xmath90645 . _ hip 95068 is the neglected _ hipparcos _ binary hds 2735 ab , a distant k - type giant . we did not resolve this 01 binary , which remains unconfirmed , but detected instead another faint star at 1 . the stellar background is crowded , the pm is small , and the status of the new companion remains uncertain . _ 19209@xmath93303 . _ hip 95106 and 95110 form the 137 pair hj 5107 ab . the rv variability of a was suspected by the gcs , it is now resolved as a 027 binary with estimated period of @xmath435yr . the component b was also observed and found unresolved . it contains a spectroscopic pair ( tokovinin , in preparation ) , the whole system is quadruple . _ 19221 - 2931 . _ hip 95203 is another acceleration binary with variable rv resolved here . the relatively large separation of 077 corresponds to a period of @xmath4180yr . the actual period can be as short as 60yr if the pair is seen now near its maximum separation ( it would then have been closer at the time of the _ hipparcos _ mission ) . most likely , however , the faint visual companion found here and the spectroscopic / acceleration pair make a triple system . there is another companion hip 95164 at 435 . the status of this wide pair ( is it a real binary or just two members of a moving group ? ) is not clear , but the association of those stars leaves no doubt ( common rv , pm , and parallax ) . _ 19409 - 0152 . _ hip 96834 has a spectroscopic orbit with a period of 1yr and expected semi - major axis of 27mas ( latham 2012 , private communication ) . we resolved this pair , although the measurement near the diffraction limit is uncertain . there are some unsolved questions , however . why , despite the small magnitude difference @xmath68 mag , were double lines not seen ? why , despite the 1-yr period , was the _ parallax not strongly affected and the star appears to be on the main sequence ? _ 19453 - 6823 . _ we resolved the secondary component of hds 2806 ab into a close pair ba , bb ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . this is a k3 dwarf within 50pc from the sun . the pair ba , bb should be fast and turn around in about 10yrs . _ 22259@xmath97501 . _ hip 110712 and 110719 form the 206 pair dun 238 ab . we observed both components . the a component has a variable rv according to the gcs , but not confirmed by @xcite ; it was unresolved . the newly found pair ba , bb has a period on the order of 10yr . considering the distant companion c found by @xcite , the system contains at least 4 stars . the measurements reported here served to improve or compute anew orbits of 194 binary stars . the orbital elements in standard notation and their formal errors are given in table 5 . its last column lists the vb6 code to a prior orbit if it exists ( astrometric orbits in brackets ) . errors of the elements ( except provisional orbits of grade 5 ) are given in the following line . for the elements that were fixed ( from , for example , a spectroscopic orbit ) , an asterisk replaces the error . as discussed in tmh14 , orbit improvements range from minor `` cosmetic '' upgrades to some quite drastic revisions . blanks in the last column indicate the 43 first - time orbit solutions ( plus three with prior astrometric orbits ) . the grades are assigned according to the general grading rules adopted in vb6 @xcite . most orbital elements are derived using the usno orbit code . we do not publish figures for all new orbits here , as they will be available online in vb6 . figure [ fig : rev ] illustrates orbit revisions ranging from dramatic to minor . three first - time orbits are presented in figure [ fig : first ] . below we comment on some pairs . _ _ wsi 97 is a single - lined nearby binary . using the radial velocities measured by d. latham ( 2012 , private communication ) , we computed a combined orbit ( the previous visual orbit reported by @xcite had a wrong period ) . the inclination is close to @xmath34 and had to be fixed in order to match the rv amplitude . the complete orbit including rvs will be published later . _ _ chr 20 is a hyades binary for which @xcite published an sb2 orbit . we combined his rvs with the speckle data , resulting in a very accurate period . the combined orbit corresponds to a mass sum of 2.1 @xmath70 and an orbital parallax of 22mas , in good agreement with the hip2 parallax of @xmath71mas . _ _ mca 18 aa , ab has an sb1 orbit with @xmath72yr . the orbit given here uses only the speckle data , however . _ _ the period of tok 194 matches the astrometric orbit of @xcite . the mass sum in this pair composed of a giant primary and possibly an a - type secondary is 5.9 @xmath42 . the measure on 2011.93 was ignored as spurious ( it was affected by vibrations ) . _ _ tok 195 is the bright star a pup ( hd 64440 , hr 3080 ) known as a spectroscopic binary . however , examination of the rv data reveals that the orbit by @xcite is only approximate . the binary is difficult to measure , always close to the diffraction limit and with @xmath73 . instead of the spectroscopic period of 6.99yr , our orbit has @xmath74yr and is still preliminary . more rv coverage is obviously needed . _ _ hu 1443 a , bc is a triple system . we provide the first very tentative orbit for the outer binary , but note its large residuals from the recent measures of ab . strictly speaking , the orbit should describe the motion of the center - of - gravity of bc around a , rather than the measures of ab . such refinement was made for the orbit of a 2592 ab _ ( 17156@xmath90949 ) _ , but it is not warranted for this preliminary orbit . _ _ tok 199 is marked as an sb2 in the gcs , while latham ( 2012 , private communication ) derived an orbital period of 916d , now independently confirmed by our orbit ( figure [ fig : first ] ) . _ _ this is the triple system hip 84430 . we computed the first orbit of the secondary subsystem ba , bb which was discovered at soar in 2009 and has just completed one full revolution since . its separation is always close to the diffraction limit . adopting a mass sum of 2.6 @xmath42 for ba , bb , the resulting dynamical parallax is [email protected] , while the hip2 parallax is [email protected] . the latest orbit of the outer pair a 2592 ab published in tmh14 does not account for the fact that the speckle measurements at soar refer to a , ba and not to ab . here we give a more accurate solution that uses the positions of ab computed from the measures of a , ba under the assumption that ba and bb have equal masses . after this correction and orbit adjustment , the weighted residuals are 4.3mas in separation and 13 in angle . interestingly , there were a considerable number of speckle - interferometry measures of this pair obtained in the 1980-s and 1990-s at 4-m telescopes , but none of them recognized the subsystem ba , bb , despite its small @xmath26 . ignoring the multiplicity , the spectroscopic survey of @xcite determined a moderate axial rotation @xmath75 km s@xmath51 and detected the lithium line of 52.8m equivalent width which , together with the x - ray detection by rosat ( rastyc 1715 - 0948 ) , normally indicates youth . these authors do not mention this star in particular , but discuss a group of active lithium - rich giants in their sample , to which this system apparently belongs . even with the larger dynamical parallax ( instead of the hip2 parallax ) , all three resolved components of hip 84430 are located above the main sequence in the color - magnitude diagram . this multiple system is peculiar and merits further study . we present here a large set of new speckle interferometry measurements of close binary stars , mostly with southern declinations . the total number of measurements made with hrcam since 2008 now exceeds 5000 . this unique data set is used for calculation of 46 new orbits and for improvement of 148 known orbits . for comparison , the data in tmh14 resulted in 13 new orbits and in the improvement ( sometimes drastic ) of 45 previously known orbits . we demonstrate the good internal consistency of speckle astrometry with hrcam by repeated measurements of relatively wide binaries . typical errors are on the order of 3mas even for these wide pairs . the high angular resolution and dynamic range of hrcam give access to close binaries never resolved before . some of those objects had prior indication of binarity from variable rv or astrometric acceleration . in such cases , direct resolution allows us to estimate statistically orbital periods ( which are typically short ) and to evaluate masses . this clarifies the statistics of binary and multiple stars in the solar neighborhood . we also resolved a number of components in previously known nearby wide binaries , converting them into triple or higher - order hierarchies . a total of 56 newly - resolved pairs are reported here , ten of those being inner or outer subsystems in visual binaries ( figure [ fig : acf ] ) . most of those subsystems are totally unexpected . some of the newly resolved binaries or subsystems are interesting for various reasons , such as being young ( e.g. x - ray sources ) , having comparable separations and approaching the dynamical stability limit , such as hip 9497 with periods of 138 and 13.9 years ( tmh14 ) , or being targets of exo - planet programs . we thank the operators of soar d. maturana , p. ugarte , s. pizarro , and j. espinoza for efficient support of our program . g. cecil has kindly loaned us his luca - r detector which was used for five nights instead of our own broken camera . r.a.m . acknowledges support from the chilean centro de excelencia en astrofsica y tecnologas afines ( cata ) basal pfb/06 , and the project ic120009 millennium institute of astrophysics ( mas ) of the iniciativa cientfica milenio del ministerio de economa , fomento y turismo de chile . r.a.m also acknowledges eso / chile for hosting him during his sabbatical leave throughout 2014 . this work used the simbad service operated by centre des donnes stellaires ( strasbourg , france ) , bibliographic references from the astrophysics data system maintained by sao / nasa , and the washington double star catalog maintained at usno . 00026@xmath90829 & a 428 & hip 210 & 14.7632 & i & 2 & 317.6 & 0.3 & 0.1197 & 0.9 & 0.4 : & @xmath91.0 & 0.003 & this work + & & & 14.8535 & i & 2 & 315.6 & 1.4 & 0.1165 & 0.8 & 0.3 & @xmath92.5 & 0.000 & this work + 00028 + 0208 & bu 281 ab & hip 223 & 14.8561 & i & 2 & 160.3 & 0.2 & 1.5938 & 0.2 & 1.4 * & & & + 00058@xmath96833 & hds 4 & hip 488 & 14.7661 & i & 2 & 229.3 & 4.8 & 0.1971 & 1.9 & 1.9 & & & + 00115@xmath95545 & hds 25 & hip 927 & 14.7661 & i & 3 & 75.3 & 0.7 & 0.1546 & 0.6 & 0.8 & & & + 00135@xmath93650 & hds 32 & hip 1083 & 14.7662 & i & 2 & 226.3 & 1.0 & 0.2565 & 0.6 & 0.8 & & & + 00143@xmath92732 & hds 33 & hip 1144 & 14.8534 & i & 2 & 55.5 & 0.3 & 0.1117 & 0.3 & 0.9 & 0.6 & @xmath90.002 & this work + & & & 14.8534 & y & 1 & 55.4 & 0.6 & 0.1115 & 0.6 & 1.0 & 0.4 & @xmath90.002 & this work l l l c c c c c c c 00006@xmath96641 & gli 289 & hip 55 & 14.7661 & i & 2 & 0.039 & 1.95 & 3.07 + 00052@xmath96251 & hip 425 & hip 425 & 14.7661 & i & 2 & 0.039 & 2.78 & 4.10 + 00174@xmath95131 & hds 40 & hip 1393 & 14.7662 & i & 2 & 0.039 & 2.56 & 3.97 + 00250@xmath93042 & hip 1976 & hip 1976 & 14.8534 & i & 2 & 0.039 & 3.42 & 4.82 + 00301 + 0452 & hip 2358 & hip 2358 & 14.8561 & i & 2 & 0.039 & 2.28 & 3.69 + 00310@xmath93138 & hds 69 & hip 2433 & 14.7662 & i & 2 & 0.039 & 1.69 & 4.01 + 00324 + 0657 & mca 1 aa , ab & hip 2548 & 14.7632 & i & 2 & 0.039 & 3.01 & 4.25 l l l cc r r l lr 01379@xmath98259 & tok 426 & hip 7601 & 14.7661 & i & 112.8 & 0.0640 & 0.5 & g1v & 36.5 + 02098@xmath94052 & tok 427 & hip 10096 & 14.7689 & i & 218.3 & 0.0397 & 1.4 & f3v & 14.1 + 03046@xmath95119 & tok 428 ba , bb & hip 14313 & 14.7635 & i & 107.9 & 0.1911 & 0.5 : & g6v ? & 18.7 + 04386@xmath90921 & tok 387 & hip 21625 & 14.0457 & i & 47.0 & 0.0557 & 0.6 & f8 ? & 16.1 + 04469@xmath96036 & tok 388 & hip 22229 & 14.0456 & i & 266.2 & 0.0431 & 1.2 & f8v & 16.1 + 05354@xmath90450 & tok 430 aa , ab & hip 26237 & 14.8567 & i & 6.2 & 0.1589 & 0.2 & b1v & 3.7 + 06303@xmath95252 & tok 435 aa , ab & hip 30995 & 15.0288 & i & 176.1 & 0.2134 & 4.1 q & g4v & 14.0 + 06497@xmath97433 & tok 389 & hip 32735 & 14.0597 & i & 330.7 & 0.3343 & 3.1 & k0iv & 15.7 + 06499@xmath92806 & hds 947 ac & hip 32767 & 15.0289 & i & 231.3 & 0.4237 & 3.2 q & k1v & 14.6 + 07040@xmath94337 & tok 390 ca , cb & hip 34052 & 14.0431 & i & 10.8 & 0.2268 & 4.4 & k6v & 57.4 + 07294@xmath91500 & tok 391 ca , cb & hip 36395 & 14.1853 & i & 121.2 & 0.0902 & 1.2 & m0v & 28.5 + 07304 + 1352 & tok 392 da , db & hip 36497 & 14.0596 & i & 67.6 & 0.1143 & 2.5 & f8 & 22.0 + 07312 + 0210 & tok 393 & hip 36557 & 14.0433 & i & 168.6 & 0.0572 & 2.0 & g0 & 15.7 + 08021@xmath91710 & tok 394 ac & hip 39293 & 14.0460 & i & 332.5 & 1.8351 & 3.0 & m1.5 & 33.3 + 08447@xmath92126 & tok 395 bc & hip 42910 & 14.0460 & i & 184.6 & 0.1645 & 0.1 & k7v & 27.5 + 09299@xmath93629 & tok 440 bc & hip 46572 & 15.0317 & i & 90.4 & 0.1126 & 1.4 q & sdf2 & 5.0 + 09586@xmath92420 & tok 437 & hip 48906 & 15.0317 & i & 292.6 & 0.0640 & 1.3 q & f3v & 8.9 + 10056@xmath98405 & tok 396 aa , ab & hip 49442 & 14.0436 & i & 192.6 & 0.1760 & 1.4 & f8v & 15.6 + 10070@xmath97129 & tok 397 & hip 49546 & 14.3027 & y & 345.5 & 0.0263 & 1.7 & f5v & 16.7 + 10223@xmath91032 & tok 398 & hip 50796 & 14.3002 & i & 147.7 & 1.6626 & 2.8 & k4v & 25.8 + 10530 + 0458 & tok 438 & hip 53212 & 15.0292 & y & 194.9 & 0.0486 & 0.8 q & g5 & 11.9 + 12176 + 1427 & tok 399 aa , ab & hip 59933 & 14.3004 & i & 95.2 & 0.0429 & 1.0 & f8 & 17.5 + 12250@xmath90414 & tok 400 & hip 60574 & 14.1855 & i & 71.2 & 0.2194 & 2.6 & g5 & 21.5 + 12528 + 1225 & tok 401 & hip 62933 & 14.3004 & y & 141.3 & 0.0598 & 1.6 & a7iii & 16.4 + 13132@xmath90501 & tok 402 & hip 64499 & 14.1858 & i & 314.8 & 0.1062 & 1.8 & g5 & 19.2 + 13321@xmath91115 & tok 291 aa , ab & hip 66018 & 14.1858 & i & 159.4 & 0.8947 & 4.6 & g0 & 18.0 + 13344@xmath95931 & tok 403 & hip 66230 & 14.1857 & i & 314.3 & 0.1037 & 2.5 & g0v & 18.6 + 13382@xmath92341 & tok 404 aa , ab & hip 66530 & 14.1857 & i & 63.4 & 0.1570 & 3.9 & g4v & 20.6 + 13401@xmath96033 & tok 292 b , ca & hip 66676b & 14.1857 & i & 293.3 & 0.9178 & 3.7 & g6v & 16.9 + 13401@xmath96033 & tok 292 ca , cb & hip 66676b & 14.1857 & i & 5.2 & 0.1614 & 0.0 & g6v & 16.9 + 13495@xmath92621 & tok 405 & hip 67458 & 14.1858 & i & 15.0 & 0.7306 & 4.4 & g9v & 24.3 + 14014@xmath93137 & tok 159 aa , ab & hip 68507 & 14.3031 & i & 101.6 & 0.0652 & 2.1 & f5 & 16.2 + 14382 + 1402 & tok 406 & hip 71572 & 14.1859 & i & 153.9 & 0.0900 & 1.5 & g5 & 21.2 + 14464@xmath93346 & tok 407 ba , bb & hip 72235b & 14.3031 & i & 41.3 & 0.4116 & 4.1 & k4 & 24.0 + 15362@xmath90623 & tok 301 aa , ab & hip 76400 & 14.1860 & i & 78.1 & 0.1908 & 3.9 & g5 & 15.7 + 15367@xmath94208 & tok 408 ca , cb & hip 76435c & 14.3007 & i & 97.2 & 0.0562 & 0.4 & k4 & 20.6 + 16142@xmath95047 & tok 409 & hip 79576 & 14.1833 & i & 145.4 & 0.0791 & 3.0 & g8v & 24.2 + 16195@xmath93054 & tok 410 ba , bb & hip 79979 & 14.1833 & i & 85.0 & 0.0396 & 1.4 & g1/g2 & 20.7 + 16454@xmath97150 & tok 411 aa , ab & hip 82032 & 14.3034 & i & 267.2 & 1.3373 & 4.1 & f8v & 18.3 + 16563@xmath94040 & tok 412 ac & hip 82876 & 14.3034 & y & 144.0 & 1.4585 & 5.1 & o7v & @xmath90.7 + 17054@xmath93346 & tok 413 aa , ab & hip 83612 & 14.3035 & y & 82.3 & 0.0303 & 1.7 : & g1v & 18.4 + 17098@xmath91031 & tok 414 & hip 83962 & 14.1833 & y & 59.1 & 0.0325 & 1.8 : & f5iv & 24.2 + 17264@xmath94837 & tok 415 ba , bb & hip 85326 & 14.3035 & i & 118.6 & 1.0059 & 2.4 * & k1v & 20.7 + 17266@xmath93258 & tok 416 & hip 85360 & 14.3035 & i & 26.9 & 1.1597 & 5.9 * & g3v & 26.4 + 17341@xmath90303 & tok 417 & hip 85963 & 14.3010 & i & 88.9 & 0.0907 & 2.6 & f8 & 15.3 + 17342@xmath91910 & tok 418 ac & hip 85965 & 14.3036 & i & 133.6 & 0.2163 & 3.3 & f2v & 2.5 + 17342@xmath95454 & tok 419 & hip 85969 & 14.1833 & i & 72.1 & 0.5544 & 3.4 & g4v & 23.7 + 18243@xmath90405 & tok 420 aa , ab & hip 90198 & 14.3037 & i & 83.6 & 0.0477 & 0.8 & a3 & 8.7 + 18267@xmath93024 & tok 421 & hip 90397 & 14.3036 & i & 100.4 & 0.0690 & 2.5 & g0v & 21.4 + 18346@xmath92734 & tok 422 aa , ab & hip 91075 & 14.3037 & i & 101.7 & 0.0864 & 1.7 & g5v & 15.0 + 19206@xmath90645 & tok 432 ac & hip 95068 & 14.3011 & i & 56.4 & 0.9751 & 6.4 * & k0 & 3.0 + 19209@xmath93303 & tok 433 aa , ab & hip 95106 & 14.7683 & i & 160.0 & 0.2721 & 2.5 & g0.5v & 21.2 + 19221@xmath92931 & tok 423 aa , ab & hip 95203 & 14.3010 & y & 36.4 & 0.7672 & 5.8 * & g0iv & 19.6 + 19409@xmath90152 & tok 424 & hip 96834 & 14.3011 & i & 102.2 & 0.0355 & 1.3 : & f8 & 20.8 + 19453@xmath96823 & tok 425 ba , bb & hip 97196 & 14.3038 & i & 312.1 & 0.0829 & 1.4 & k3 & 21.3 + 22259@xmath97501 & tok 434 ba , bb & hip 110719 & 14.7657 & i & 58.1 & 0.1917 & 1.4 : & k5 & 43.4 l l rrr rrr r ccll 00026@xmath90829 & a 428 & 414.95 & 2005.35 & 0.503 & 192.2 & 0.505 & 111.9 & 226.8 & 4 & zul1984b + & & @xmath5620.96 & @xmath562.47 & @xmath560.013 & @xmath562.0 & @xmath560.021 & @xmath561.2 & @xmath564.2 & & + 00143@xmath92732 & hds 33 & 10.22 & 2013.47 & 0.609 & 215.3 & 0.124 & 28.4 & 80.0 & 2 & cve2012 + & & @xmath560.07 & @xmath560.04 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath565.3 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath562.5 & @xmath564.3 & & + 00155@xmath91608 & hei 299 & 4.550 & 1995.363 & 0.360 & 60.8 & 0.306 & 145.6 & 344.5 & 2 & hry1998 + & & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.016 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath561.4 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath561.3 & @xmath562.2 & & + 00315@xmath96257 & i 260 cd & 44.73 & 2011.62 & 0.810 & 241.6 & 0.495 & 124.7 & 112.2 & 3 & msn2001c + & & @xmath560.34 & @xmath560.01 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.2 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.3 & @xmath560.2 & & + 00321@xmath90511 & a 111 ab & 10.64 & 2015.19 & 0.538 & 206.5 & 0.122 & 155.7 & 101.6 & 2 & sta1978b + & & @xmath560.02 & @xmath560.19 & @xmath560.014 & @xmath5618.5 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath564.2 & @xmath5614.9 & & + 00533@xmath690405 & a 2307 & 57.78 & 2012.51 & 0.419 & 222.4 & 0.233 & 74.3 & 357.9 & 2 & usn1999b + & & @xmath563.87 & @xmath561.25 & @xmath560.029 & @xmath561.4 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath561.6 & @xmath5613.2 & & + 01024@xmath690504 & hds 135 ab & 28.23 & 2002.69 & 0.671 & 268.6 & 0.461 & 144.8 & 22.1 & 2 & bag2006 + & & @xmath560.17 & @xmath560.01 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath561.2 & & + 01028@xmath690214 & a 2308 & 141.80 & 1958.95 & 0.124 & 306.6 & 0.367 & 62.9 & 10.5 & 3 & baz1984a + & & @xmath565.52 & @xmath564.96 & @xmath560.025 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath562.2 & @xmath5613.9 & & + 01104@xmath96727 & gki 3 & 1.778 & 1986.193 & 0.112 & 68.2 & 0.147 & 133.3 & 73.0 & 3 & ( gln2007 ) + & & @xmath560.006 & @xmath560.176 & @xmath560.033 & @xmath569.8 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath567.0 & @xmath5630.8 & & + 01196@xmath90520 & a 313 & 128.51 & 2014.72 & 0.161 & 171.5 & 0.274 & 133.7 & 245.5 & 2 & usn1999a + & & @xmath562.24 & @xmath561.42 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath562.4 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath564.5 & & + 01220@xmath96943 & i 263 & 272.15 & 1936.56 & 0.374 & 231.3 & 0.791 & 68.6 & 297.3 & 4 & msn1999a + & & @xmath5647.48 & @xmath565.30 & @xmath560.059 & @xmath562.8 & @xmath560.075 & @xmath561.9 & @xmath5614.1 & & + 01308@xmath95940 & tok 183 & 4.66 & 2012.83 & 0.462 & 349.5 & 0.0458 & 75.0 & 13.9 & 4 & + & & @xmath560.23 & @xmath560.23 & @xmath560.067 & @xmath563.4 & @xmath560.0030 & @xmath560.0 & @xmath5616.2 & & + 01350@xmath92955 & daw 31 ab & 4.562 & 1932.600 & 0.317 & 224.3 & 0.174 & 19.5 & 244.6 & 1 & msn1999c + & & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.034 & @xmath560.007 & @xmath569.9 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath562.9 & @xmath569.4 & & + 01424@xmath90645 & a 1 & 637.62 & 1888.34 & 0.454 & 232.1 & 0.844 & 42.0 & 264.7 & 5 & sca2008c + 01528@xmath90447 & rst 4188 & 618.71 & 2619.26 & 0.553 & 22.7 & 1.048 & 72.1 & 10.9 & 5 & hei1996a + 02158@xmath91814 & htg 1 & 295.93 & 1681.32 & 0.151 & 187.1 & 2.184 & 35.5 & 270.2 & 5 & sod1999 + 02166@xmath95026 & tok 185 & 16.00 & 2011.32 & 0.467 & 243.6 & 0.132 & 63.2 & 312.4 & 5 & + 02374@xmath95233 & tok 186 & 3.22 & 2011.31 & 0.083 & 52.0 & 0.0785 & 115.5 & 17.0 & 3 & + & & @xmath560.06 & @xmath560.23 & @xmath560.020 & @xmath563.0 & @xmath560.0031 & @xmath562.5 & @xmath5625.4 & & + 02405@xmath92408 & see 19 & 310.26 & 2016.80 & 0.839 & 225.6 & 0.393 & 147.2 & 73.2 & 4 & lin2010c + & & @xmath56146.13 & @xmath560.32 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath5639.0 & @xmath560.098 & @xmath563.3 & @xmath5622.9 & & + 02415@xmath97128 & b 1923 & 101.50 & 2011.42 & 0.376 & 222.9 & 0.522 & 116.3 & 252.3 & 4 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath562.77 & @xmath560.33 & @xmath560.015 & @xmath562.8 & @xmath560.010 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath562.0 & & + 02517@xmath95234 & hu 1562 & 65.00 & 2021.92 & 0.876 & 237.4 & 0.264 & 111.7 & 6.1 & 4 & hei1979b + & & @xmath566.18 & @xmath560.35 & @xmath560.029 & @xmath563.1 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath565.2 & @xmath5610.4 & & + 02572@xmath92458 & beu 4 ca , cb & 1.518 & 2007.088 & 0.540 & 2.0 & 0.062 & 160.4 & 341.8 & 2 & tok2014a + & & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.021 & @xmath560.024 & @xmath569.1 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath5612.0 & @xmath5611.0 & & + 03014@xmath690615 & hds 385 & 15.27 & 2012.90 & 0.397 & 347.4 & 0.117 & 52.5 & 2.7 & 2 & bag2005 + & & @xmath560.09 & @xmath560.07 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath562.4 & & + 03236@xmath94005 & i 468 & 237.68 & 1971.45 & 0.505 & 319.5 & 2.548 & 41.6 & 30.9 & 5 & sod1999 + 03272@xmath690944 & hds 433 & 50.81 & 2008.43 & 0.571 & 109.4 & 0.439 & 26.7 & 8.0 & 3 & cve2010c + & & @xmath560.62 & @xmath560.04 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath562.9 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath561.2 & @xmath562.9 & & + 03339@xmath93105 & b 52 & 19.36 & 1997.19 & 0.363 & 140.8 & 0.224 & 85.7 & 11.1 & 2 & hei1996c + & & @xmath560.05 & @xmath560.17 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.8 & @xmath564.1 & & + 03544@xmath94021 & fin 344 ab & 14.03 & 2008.05 & 0.579 & 247.4 & 0.0614 & 32.4 & 49.7 & 2 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.04 & @xmath560.04 & @xmath560.008 & @xmath562.0 & @xmath560.0005 & @xmath561.5 & @xmath562.3 & & + 03545@xmath690510 & a 1831 bc & 216.02 & 1986.20 & 0.099 & 231.8 & 0.187 & 56.0 & 300.1 & 4 & ole1998a + & & @xmath5642.23 & @xmath5625.43 & @xmath560.144 & @xmath565.3 & @xmath560.013 & @xmath565.4 & @xmath5647.3 & & + 04008@xmath690505 & a 1937 & 42.93 & 2014.94 & 0.550 & 25.9 & 0.1000 & 47.1 & 14.7 & 2 & tok2014a + & & @xmath561.13 & @xmath560.15 & @xmath560.019 & @xmath564.4 & @xmath560.0012 & @xmath563.1 & @xmath568.0 & & + 04070@xmath91000 & hds 521 ab & 21.42 & 1996.78 & 0.687 & 219.0 & 0.225 & 122.9 & 76.4 & 3 & msn2011a + & & @xmath560.37 & @xmath560.06 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath561.8 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath560.5 & & + 04163@xmath690710 & wsi 97 & 5.6805 & 1997.088 & 0.808 & 358.1 & 0.1011 & 148.0 & 47.6 & 3 & rao2014 + & & @xmath560.0058 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath560.0009 & * & @xmath561.7 & & + 04368@xmath91733 & a 2915 & 109.99 & 2012.35 & 0.470 & 151.8 & 0.305 & 62.0 & 94.1 & 3 & baz1986a + & & @xmath567.99 & @xmath561.14 & @xmath560.053 & @xmath564.1 & @xmath560.025 & @xmath565.0 & @xmath5612.9 & & + 04374@xmath90951 & rst 3401 & 126.18 & 1967.68 & 0.366 & 98.9 & 0.325 & 146.2 & 52.9 & 3 & nov2007d + & & @xmath566.11 & @xmath561.47 & @xmath560.026 & @xmath5610.9 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath565.2 & @xmath5614.5 & & + 04389@xmath91207 & hds 599 & 48.48 & 2003.67 & 0.828 & 152.5 & 0.333 & 78.4 & 281.2 & 4 & cve2014 + & & @xmath564.70 & @xmath560.22 & @xmath560.032 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath560.8 & & + 04422@xmath690259 & a 2424 & 55.79 & 2011.46 & 0.348 & 228.8 & 0.147 & 85.0 & 90.8 & 3 & wrh1976a + & & @xmath564.07 & @xmath560.64 & @xmath560.012 & @xmath560.6 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath569.0 & & + 04505@xmath690103 & a 2622 & 403.34 & 1956.27 & 0.477 & 259.9 & 0.345 & 127.1 & 270.1 & 4 & sca2003a + & & @xmath5662.54 & @xmath565.59 & @xmath560.046 & @xmath5610.2 & @xmath560.044 & @xmath564.9 & @xmath5623.0 & & + 04506@xmath691505 & chr 20 & 5.734 & 2003.829 & 0.058 & 130.1 & 0.0904 & 114.4 & 92.8 & 3 & sod1999 + & & @xmath560.005 & @xmath560.096 & @xmath560.007 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath560.0010 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath566.0 & & + 04515@xmath93454 & fin 320 & 42.92 & 2006.48 & 0.826 & 198.4 & 0.227 & 111.6 & 292.1 & 3 & doc2013d + & & @xmath560.39 & @xmath560.13 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath560.6 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.3 & @xmath560.2 & & + 04545@xmath90314 & rst 5501 & 84.66 & 2004.32 & 0.515 & 219.1 & 0.243 & 120.8 & 310.3 & 3 & msn2011c + & & @xmath561.42 & @xmath560.39 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath561.4 & @xmath561.9 & & + 05025@xmath92115 & don 91 ab & 43.55 & 1997.46 & 0.720 & 246.5 & 1.062 & 60.7 & 280.6 & 4 & sod1999 + & & @xmath560.27 & @xmath560.86 & @xmath560.028 & @xmath563.9 & @xmath560.049 & @xmath562.1 & @xmath561.2 & & + 05073@xmath98352 & hds 669 & 26.45 & 2014.41 & 0.669 & 6.1 & 0.272 & 61.0 & 71.3 & 4 & + & & @xmath561.01 & @xmath560.03 & @xmath560.016 & @xmath562.8 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath561.4 & @xmath562.8 & & + 05245@xmath90224 & mca 18 aa , ab & 9.399 & 2011.613 & 0.435 & 129.0 & 0.0462 & 103.5 & 34.7 & 3 & bag1999b + & & @xmath560.040 & @xmath560.000 & @xmath560.432 & @xmath566.4 & @xmath560.0195 & @xmath5615.3 & @xmath5627.1 & & + 05289@xmath90318 & da 6 & 1491.21 & 1995.70 & 0.846 & 247.1 & 1.021 & 48.3 & 349.7 & 4 & lin2010c + & & @xmath56672.53 & @xmath561.14 & @xmath560.045 & @xmath564.3 & @xmath560.287 & @xmath562.3 & @xmath561.1 & & + 05484@xmath692052 & stt 118 ab & 227.52 & 1986.06 & 0.869 & 137.9 & 0.792 & 89.7 & 290.8 & 4 & pal2005b + & & @xmath5615.48 & @xmath560.09 & @xmath560.026 & @xmath562.0 & @xmath560.037 & @xmath560.8 & @xmath561.4 & & + 05532@xmath96150 & slr 15 & 1251.74 & 1970.32 & 0.824 & 138.4 & 1.303 & 122.1 & 292.2 & 4 & hei1993d + & & @xmath5678.90 & @xmath560.75 & @xmath560.008 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath560.061 & @xmath562.2 & @xmath563.6 & & + 05542@xmath92909 & fin 382 & 20.16 & 2014.80 & 0.473 & 169.2 & 0.154 & 129.5 & 110.8 & 3 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.03 & @xmath560.08 & @xmath560.018 & @xmath564.0 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath562.4 & @xmath565.1 & & + 06293@xmath90248 & b 2601 ab & 16.53 & 1999.33 & 0.387 & 209.6 & 1.072 & 53.3 & 42.0 & 3 & sgr2000 + & & @xmath560.01 & @xmath560.01 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.3 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.2 & @xmath560.4 & & + 06314@xmath690749 & a 2817 & 31.55 & 2015.34 & 0.281 & 57.3 & 0.192 & 37.3 & 320.8 & 2 & pop1969b + & & @xmath561.41 & @xmath560.28 & @xmath560.015 & @xmath564.4 & @xmath560.007 & @xmath561.9 & @xmath5611.7 & & + 06359@xmath93605 & rst 4816 ba , bb & 14.03 & 2004.09 & 0.577 & 288.8 & 0.182 & 111.9 & 296.2 & 2 & tok2012b + & & @xmath560.02 & @xmath560.03 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath560.3 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.2 & @xmath560.4 & & + 06439@xmath95434 & hds 934 & 12.37 & 2014.21 & 0.216 & 93.4 & 0.132 & 18.5 & 70.3 & 3 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.02 & @xmath560.04 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath564.6 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath561.9 & @xmath564.2 & & + 06454@xmath93148 & ehr 9 ba , bb & 6.865 & 2014.728 & 0.224 & 189.7 & 0.126 & 138.9 & 5.6 & 4 & + & & @xmath560.137 & @xmath560.318 & @xmath560.038 & @xmath5613.6 & @xmath560.010 & @xmath568.3 & @xmath5615.5 & & + 06481@xmath90948 & a 1056 & 616.86 & 1962.17 & 0.522 & 256.0 & 0.501 & 56.7 & 280.6 & 4 & sca1983f + & & @xmath56513.30 & @xmath5610.30 & @xmath560.282 & @xmath5613.7 & @xmath560.255 & @xmath567.0 & @xmath5632.6 & & + 06490@xmath91509 & ac 4 & 581.32 & 2031.70 & 0.761 & 157.5 & 0.957 & 52.6 & 280.6 & 5 & + 06493@xmath90216 & fin 322 & 58.69 & 1969.56 & 0.293 & 241.6 & 0.148 & 112.2 & 68.0 & 3 & hrt2011d + & & @xmath561.61 & @xmath560.78 & @xmath560.015 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath561.2 & @xmath566.0 & & + 07026@xmath691558 & a 2462 ab & 44.45 & 2012.79 & 0.661 & 67.3 & 0.204 & 134.4 & 45.5 & 3 & baz1976 + & & @xmath560.44 & @xmath560.02 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath560.8 & & + 07043@xmath90303 & a 519 ab & 90.40 & 2012.50 & 0.260 & 93.6 & 0.397 & 96.6 & 283.0 & 3 & tok2014a + & & @xmath561.44 & @xmath560.42 & @xmath560.026 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath563.4 & & + 07113@xmath91032 & a 2122 & 169.68 & 2021.25 & 0.712 & 150.3 & 0.203 & 120.2 & 228.6 & 4 & usn2002 + & & @xmath5613.75 & @xmath562.39 & @xmath560.021 & @xmath565.1 & @xmath560.007 & @xmath563.7 & @xmath562.5 & & + 07143@xmath92621 & fin 323 & 118.54 & 1971.01 & 0.747 & 131.3 & 0.178 & 80.2 & 85.0 & 4 & ole2004b + & & @xmath5611.14 & @xmath560.74 & @xmath560.094 & @xmath563.0 & @xmath560.012 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath563.6 & & + 07155@xmath97552 & i 312 & 847.09 & 2012.33 & 0.859 & 152.9 & 2.308 & 97.5 & 86.1 & 5 & + 07175@xmath94659 & i 7 & 85.01 & 1958.70 & 0.955 & 236.0 & 0.891 & 104.4 & 244.8 & 3 & msn2011c + & & @xmath561.22 & @xmath560.44 & @xmath560.014 & @xmath565.1 & @xmath560.048 & @xmath562.3 & @xmath562.5 & & + 07374@xmath93458 & fin 324 ac & 80.68 & 2016.58 & 0.648 & 262.1 & 0.323 & 158.6 & 32.7 & 3 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath561.63 & @xmath560.37 & @xmath560.014 & @xmath568.4 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath564.9 & @xmath568.2 & & + 07435@xmath92711 & b 737 & 290.20 & 1967.59 & 0.566 & 86.2 & 0.335 & 105.7 & 324.4 & 4 & + & & @xmath5614.74 & @xmath561.93 & @xmath560.014 & @xmath562.1 & @xmath560.016 & @xmath561.2 & @xmath564.3 & & + 07456@xmath93410 & tok 193 & 15.00 & 2010.83 & 0.305 & 58.4 & 0.473 & 67.7 & 342.5 & 4 & + & & * & @xmath560.15 & @xmath560.032 & @xmath560.8 & @xmath560.016 & @xmath561.4 & @xmath566.8 & & + 07490@xmath92455 & tok 194 & 2.422 & 2011.557 & 0.408 & 212 . & 0.0374 & 29.5 & 295.3 & 3 & + & & @xmath560.075 & @xmath560.084 & @xmath560.072 & @xmath5632.&@xmath560.0031 & @xmath5613.9 & @xmath5628.8 & & + 07522@xmath94035 & tok 195 & 7.388 & 2012.067 & 0.380 & 90.3 & 0.0624 & 86.2 & 170.0 & 4 & ( jnc2005 ) + & & @xmath560.657 & @xmath560.206 & @xmath560.000 & @xmath566.8 & @xmath560.0071 & @xmath567.0 & @xmath560.0 & & + 08061@xmath90047 & a 1971 & 572.52 & 1910.43 & 0.409 & 202.8 & 1.070 & 125.6 & 99.1 & 5 & ole1993 + 08125@xmath94616 & chr 143 aa , ab & 31.42 & 2017.49 & 0.339 & 173.6 & 0.0738 & 71.7 & 257.6 & 3 & msn2010c + & & @xmath560.33 & @xmath560.21 & @xmath560.020 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath560.0012 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath562.0 & & + 08144@xmath94550 & fin 113 ab & 385.48 & 1973.09 & 0.700 & 103.4 & 0.566 & 81.6 & 346.0 & 5 & cve2010e + 08251@xmath94910 & rst 321 & 25.78 & 2000.85 & 0.219 & 128.6 & 0.310 & 40.9 & 232.1 & 2 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.41 & @xmath560.15 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath560.8 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath564.1 & & + 08270@xmath95242 & b 1606 & 14.66 & 2011.84 & 0.353 & 277.0 & 0.152 & 61.7 & 11.9 & 2 & tok2012b + & & @xmath560.08 & @xmath560.01 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.2 & @xmath560.000 & @xmath560.1 & @xmath560.2 & & + 08317@xmath92601 & i 807 & 720.66 & 1936.16 & 0.370 & 134.2 & 0.631 & 129.4 & 244.5 & 5 & + 08345@xmath93236 & fin 335 & 17.36 & 2014.08 & 0.572 & 268.9 & 0.139 & 30.6 & 43.8 & 2 & doc2013d + & & @xmath560.03 & @xmath560.03 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath561.9 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath561.3 & @xmath562.0 & & + 08380@xmath90844 & hds 1242 & 41.66 & 2014.55 & 0.392 & 198.2 & 0.249 & 24.9 & 254.0 & 4 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath564.50 & @xmath560.53 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath5614.8 & @xmath560.020 & @xmath566.3 & @xmath565.1 & & + 08391@xmath95557 & hu 1443 ab & 876.85 & 1860.89 & 0.644 & 104.3 & 1.400 & 128.1 & 314.0 & 5 & + 08421@xmath95245 & b 1624 & 74.05 & 1995.69 & 0.240 & 89.7 & 0.474 & 71.4 & 0.1 & 3 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.43 & @xmath560.31 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.2 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.2 & @xmath562.1 & & + 08431@xmath91225 & rst 3603 & 98.92 & 1964.70 & 0.393 & 155.5 & 0.268 & 154.5 & 14.1 & 3 & hrt2010a + & & @xmath563.48 & @xmath561.39 & @xmath560.031 & @xmath5613.1 & @xmath560.007 & @xmath5610.0 & @xmath5617.8 & & + 08447@xmath94238 & chr 238 & 2.257 & 2012.557 & 0.615 & 42.4 & 0.0785 & 145.8 & 332.8 & 3 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.004 & @xmath560.056 & @xmath560.042 & @xmath567.1 & @xmath560.0046 & @xmath5614.0 & @xmath567.9 & & + 08474@xmath91703 & bu 586 & 442.24 & 2009.74 & 0.529 & 239.7 & 0.538 & 63.9 & 317.3 & 5 & msn2009 + 08538@xmath94731 & fin 316 & 7.209 & 2007.601 & 0.253 & 108.5 & 0.0781 & 11.1 & 106.8 & 2 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.004 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath568.8 & @xmath560.0003 & @xmath561.6 & @xmath568.7 & & + 08539@xmath690149 & a 2554 & 43.86 & 2021.18 & 0.502 & 112.4 & 0.210 & 162.4 & 339.7 & 3 & zir2007 + & & @xmath560.80 & @xmath560.30 & @xmath560.030 & @xmath5616.7 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath5611.4 & @xmath5617.3 & & + 08589@xmath690829 & del 2 & 5.566 & 2006.445 & 0.778 & 281.8 & 0.398 & 122.2 & 23.7 & 3 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.024 & @xmath560.039 & @xmath560.019 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath560.008 & @xmath563.1 & @xmath563.2 & & + 09149@xmath690427 & hei 350 & 198.56 & 2000.40 & 0.574 & 84.6 & 1.856 & 122.2 & 344.7 & 5 & ( hei1994a ) + 09173@xmath96841 & fin 363 ab & 3.445 & 2013.376 & 0.455 & 154.6 & 0.0888 & 140.7 & 117.2 & 2 & doc2013d + & & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.007 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.8 & @xmath560.0004 & @xmath560.6 & @xmath560.7 & & + 09194@xmath97739 & koh 83 aa , ab & 19.84 & 1999.00 & 0.795 & 20.2 & 0.146 & 65.0 & 276.2 & 5 & + 09228@xmath90950 & a 1342 ab & 52.98 & 2020.20 & 0.074 & 202.4 & 0.169 & 68.5 & 58.7 & 2 & msn2011a + & & @xmath560.37 & @xmath560.45 & @xmath560.008 & @xmath560.4 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.6 & @xmath563.3 & & + 09252@xmath91258 & wsi 73 & 27.3 & 2014.80 & 0.860 & 101.1 & 0.235 & 86.0 & 283.4 & 5 & + 09275@xmath95806 & chr 240 & 2.621 & 2014.453 & 0.173 & 267.4 & 0.0478 & 111.4 & 125.6 & 3 & + & & @xmath560.025 & @xmath560.049 & @xmath560.029 & @xmath562.3 & @xmath560.0018 & @xmath562.3 & @xmath566.6 & & + 09278@xmath90604 & b 2530 & 34.80 & 2010.11 & 0.270 & 330.8 & 0.428 & 85.4 & 341.9 & 2 & sod1999 + & & @xmath560.06 & @xmath560.10 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.1 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.1 & @xmath561.1 & & + 09313@xmath91329 & kui 41 & 18.38 & 2002.17 & 0.335 & 230.8 & 0.647 & 139.9 & 105.3 & 3 & sod1999 + & & @xmath560.11 & @xmath560.03 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.2 & @xmath560.6 & & + 09327@xmath690152 & fin 349 & 40.57 & 1972.12 & 0.420 & 138.6 & 0.154 & 54.7 & 72.6 & 2 & msn2011a + & & @xmath560.19 & @xmath560.16 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath560.6 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.6 & @xmath560.8 & & + 09387@xmath93937 & i 202 & 163.69 & 2005.49 & 0.414 & 178.6 & 0.932 & 111.4 & 203.4 & 4 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath563.53 & @xmath560.67 & @xmath560.012 & @xmath561.1 & @xmath560.017 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath562.2 & & + 09407@xmath95759 & b 780 & 10.63 & 2005.86 & 0.338 & 86.1 & 0.123 & 128.6 & 17.6 & 2 & drs2012 + & & @xmath560.01 & @xmath560.02 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.3 & @xmath560.000 & @xmath560.3 & @xmath560.8 & & + 09495@xmath91033 & a 1344 & 260.75 & 1991.89 & 0.781 & 119.5 & 0.355 & 116.2 & 90.9 & 4 & hei1986b + & & @xmath5625.54 & @xmath561.16 & @xmath560.030 & @xmath562.4 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath562.6 & @xmath561.8 & & + 10050@xmath95119 & hu 1594 & 134.51 & 2028.97 & 0.629 & 87.3 & 0.281 & 64.4 & 21.0 & 3 & usn2002 + & & @xmath563.76 & @xmath562.28 & @xmath560.033 & @xmath561.6 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath563.3 & @xmath564.6 & & + 10120@xmath92836 & b 194 & 91.89 & 2003.58 & 0.676 & 198.3 & 0.226 & 76.0 & 59.7 & 3 & usn2002 + & & @xmath560.85 & @xmath560.22 & @xmath560.012 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath561.1 & & + 10161@xmath92837 & tok 199 & 2.507 & 2014.734 & 0.353 & 278.5 & 0.0450 & 114.5 & 51.8 & 4 & + & & @xmath560.022 & @xmath560.020 & @xmath560.017 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath560.0013 & @xmath561.8 & @xmath563.0 & & + 10282@xmath92548 & fin 308 ab & 32.76 & 2018.13 & 0.739 & 155.4 & 0.144 & 48.6 & 270.6 & 3 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath562.67 & @xmath561.28 & @xmath560.135 & @xmath564.5 & @xmath560.033 & @xmath5616.2 & @xmath562.7 & & + 10375@xmath90932 & rst 3708 & 154.81 & 1971.26 & 0.457 & 183.9 & 0.416 & 54.6 & 24.4 & 4 & hei1991 + & & @xmath5655.88 & @xmath5611.57 & @xmath560.197 & @xmath5617.0 & @xmath560.026 & @xmath5619.7 & @xmath5637.9 & & + 10419@xmath97811 & hds 1530 & 43.48 & 2007.33 & 0.637 & 114.9 & 0.277 & 55.2 & 121.2 & 5 & + 10426@xmath690335 & a 2768 & 81.66 & 1976.39 & 0.550 & 57.8 & 0.401 & 140.1 & 354.9 & 2 & hrt2010a + & & @xmath562.05 & @xmath560.21 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath562.9 & & + 10465@xmath96416 & fin 364 ab & 13.25 & 2020.60 & 0.025 & 316.7 & 0.0805 & 115.2 & 17.6 & 2 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.20 & @xmath562.49 & @xmath560.022 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath560.0014 & @xmath562.2 & @xmath5664.8 & & + 10529@xmath91717 & hds 1556 & 14.93 & 2002.74 & 0.544 & 110.5 & 0.173 & 99.2 & 51.4 & 3 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.26 & @xmath561.39 & @xmath560.056 & @xmath562.1 & @xmath560.028 & @xmath563.6 & @xmath5617.3 & & + 10557@xmath690044 & bu 1076 & 138.90 & 1921.62 & 0.714 & 219.3 & 0.750 & 125.7 & 323.4 & 4 & hrt2010a + & & @xmath563.02 & @xmath565.07 & @xmath560.036 & @xmath564.0 & @xmath560.069 & @xmath569.5 & @xmath5610.8 & & + 11009@xmath94030 & fin 365 & 26.86 & 1990.21 & 0.087 & 107.4 & 0.168 & 100.5 & 50.5 & 3 & tok2012b + & & @xmath560.23 & @xmath561.14 & @xmath560.029 & @xmath561.1 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath5616.3 & & + 11014@xmath91204 & hds 1572 & 18.64 & 2013.69 & 0.686 & 142.4 & 0.173 & 98.7 & 133.8 & 3 & + & & @xmath560.72 & @xmath560.03 & @xmath560.013 & @xmath560.4 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.8 & @xmath561.5 & & + 11102@xmath91122 & hds 1590 & 20.63 & 1995.82 & 0.698 & 255.8 & 0.136 & 129.4 & 72.2 & 3 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath561.62 & @xmath561.68 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath565.4 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath561.5 & & + 11125@xmath91830 & bu 220 & 365.68 & 1983.93 & 0.434 & 325.3 & 0.553 & 99.8 & 337.3 & 4 & hei1995 + & & @xmath568.02 & @xmath563.59 & @xmath560.014 & @xmath560.6 & @xmath560.022 & @xmath560.8 & @xmath566.7 & & + 11272@xmath91539 & hu 462 & 48.40 & 2008.46 & 0.087 & 127.6 & 0.445 & 166.5 & 347.7 & 2 & wsi2006b + & & @xmath560.11 & @xmath560.49 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath5611.7 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath562.9 & @xmath5610.5 & & + 11297@xmath90619 & a 7 & 204.32 & 2050.54 & 0.656 & 93.3 & 0.447 & 105.1 & 59.8 & 4 & usn2002 + & & @xmath5611.20 & @xmath5619.37 & @xmath560.017 & @xmath564.9 & @xmath560.077 & @xmath565.8 & @xmath5613.4 & & + 11544@xmath93745 & hwe 71 & 248.80 & 2008.48 & 0.720 & 276.3 & 1.004 & 99.6 & 162.0 & 5 & + 12396@xmath93717 & daw 63 & 56.85 & 2021.02 & 0.287 & 194.5 & 0.387 & 21.6 & 3.7 & 3 & hrt2010a + & & @xmath560.32 & @xmath560.55 & @xmath560.015 & @xmath5613.8 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath565.3 & @xmath5616.4 & & + 13145@xmath92417 & fin 297 ab & 60.81 & 1957.92 & 0.691 & 188.3 & 0.233 & 66.0 & 295.0 & 2 & msn2010c + & & @xmath563.27 & @xmath563.17 & @xmath560.041 & @xmath562.7 & @xmath560.010 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath562.2 & & + 13169@xmath93436 & i 1567 & 40.88 & 2006.40 & 0.457 & 145.5 & 0.326 & 121.6 & 274.0 & 2 & tok2012b + & & @xmath560.18 & @xmath560.01 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.2 & @xmath560.000 & @xmath560.1 & @xmath560.4 & & + 13310@xmath93924 & see 179 & 83.14 & 1956.12 & 0.521 & 146.5 & 0.161 & 145.2 & 244.4 & 2 & fin1964b + & & @xmath561.26 & @xmath561.91 & @xmath560.013 & @xmath568.6 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath564.0 & @xmath563.6 & & + 13342@xmath91623 & rst 3844 & 121.85 & 2010.94 & 0.432 & 264.5 & 0.255 & 117.6 & 19.4 & 3 & usn2002 + & & @xmath562.70 & @xmath560.49 & @xmath560.007 & @xmath561.1 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath562.4 & & + 13472@xmath90943 & kui 65 & 155.21 & 2014.17 & 0.854 & 99.0 & 0.268 & 144.2 & 22.7 & 3 & zir2012 + & & @xmath5620.85 & @xmath560.11 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath564.5 & @xmath560.012 & @xmath566.1 & @xmath567.6 & & + 13571@xmath92731 & i 234 & 200.72 & 2057.91 & 0.725 & 165.9 & 0.773 & 117.3 & 83.9 & 4 & mro1966b + & & @xmath5617.44 & @xmath5610.04 & @xmath560.023 & @xmath568.6 & @xmath560.043 & @xmath561.3 & @xmath561.1 & & + 14020@xmath92108 & wsi 79 & 30.00 & 2015.16 & 0.746 & 123.3 & 0.239 & 135.3 & 119.4 & 4 & + & & * & @xmath560.17 & @xmath560.037 & @xmath569.9 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath562.7 & @xmath569.2 & & + 14025@xmath92440 & b 263 & 161.43 & 2014.56 & 0.499 & 20.4 & 0.480 & 38.8 & 81.7 & 4 & + & & @xmath5628.68 & @xmath561.92 & @xmath560.019 & @xmath569.9 & @xmath560.072 & @xmath569.0 & @xmath5610.0 & & + 14190@xmath90636 & hds2016 ab & 18.67 & 2003.74 & 0.302 & 285.0 & 0.348 & 107.9 & 71.0 & 3 & + & & @xmath560.33 & @xmath560.03 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath560.8 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath562.2 & & + 14295@xmath93702 & hds 2045 aa , ab & 18.39 & 2008.92 & 0.468 & 160.0 & 0.137 & 126.9 & 137.3 & 3 & + & & @xmath560.74 & @xmath560.06 & @xmath560.018 & @xmath562.6 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath562.0 & @xmath562.2 & & + 14375@xmath690217 & chr 42 aa , ab & 21.54 & 1994.64 & 0.844 & 312.4 & 0.143 & 53.7 & 41.9 & 3 & hrt2000a + & & @xmath560.10 & @xmath560.20 & @xmath560.016 & @xmath563.6 & @xmath560.007 & @xmath563.0 & @xmath565.6 & & + 14581@xmath94852 & wsi 80 & 23.40 & 1998.44 & 0.724 & 267.3 & 0.342 & 113.1 & 297.0 & 4 & + & & @xmath560.94 & @xmath562.07 & @xmath560.020 & @xmath564.9 & @xmath560.050 & @xmath566.6 & @xmath568.6 & & + 15047@xmath95625 & rst 2937 & 146.05 & 2006.50 & 0.809 & 173.6 & 0.214 & 105.9 & 113.4 & 4 & + & & @xmath5624.74 & @xmath560.03 & @xmath560.054 & @xmath562.0 & @xmath560.028 & @xmath564.3 & @xmath566.0 & & + 15226@xmath94755 & slr 20 & 429.60 & 1972.88 & 0.469 & 56.0 & 1.899 & 109.7 & 344.6 & 4 & hei1993d + & & @xmath564.57 & @xmath561.56 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath560.019 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath562.0 & & + 15227@xmath94441 & cop 2 ab & 736.69 & 2009.83 & 0.808 & 125.1 & 1.409 & 117.6 & 19.6 & 5 & zir2007 + 15246@xmath94835 & b 1288 ab & 449.82 & 2013.70 & 0.742 & 143.4 & 0.326 & 67.5 & 284.9 & 4 & usn2002 + & & @xmath5650.91 & @xmath560.60 & @xmath560.019 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath560.028 & @xmath562.3 & @xmath566.1 & & + 15252@xmath94659 & rst 767 & 249.27 & 1921.63 & 0.504 & 116.6 & 0.525 & 136.0 & 335.4 & 5 & csa1975c + 15262@xmath92819 & rst 769 & 201.47 & 1977.28 & 0.379 & 163.2 & 0.392 & 141.9 & 238.0 & 5 & doc1996b + 15355@xmath94751 & hds 2191 & 62.52 & 2005.25 & 0.315 & 201.9 & 0.302 & 88.6 & 267.1 & 4 & + & & @xmath5614.96 & @xmath561.10 & @xmath560.243 & @xmath561.1 & @xmath560.037 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath5614.6 & & + 15420@xmath690027 & a 2176 & 52.68 & 1987.16 & 0.653 & 97.7 & 0.148 & 27.2 & 279.3 & 2 & usn2006b + & & @xmath562.04 & @xmath560.38 & @xmath560.027 & @xmath5612.9 & @xmath560.008 & @xmath567.4 & @xmath569.9 & & + 16035@xmath95747 & see 258 ab & 26.84 & 1990.87 & 0.515 & 42.0 & 0.328 & 168.7 & 320.0 & 2 & sod1999 + & & @xmath560.09 & @xmath560.21 & @xmath560.012 & @xmath5643.2 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath569.9 & @xmath5644.1 & & + 16065@xmath94027 & rst 1876 & 96.95 & 2037.31 & 0.006 & 97.5 & 0.303 & 97.5 & 338.1 & 4 & + & & @xmath562.07 & @xmath561.54 & @xmath560.027 & @xmath560.8 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath566.2 & & + 16085@xmath91006 & bu 949 & 56.33 & 2018.34 & 0.774 & 198.1 & 0.289 & 82.3 & 157.8 & 2 & hrt2009 + & & @xmath560.20 & @xmath560.35 & @xmath560.016 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath562.9 & & + 16170@xmath95342 & i 987 & 102.47 & 1952.08 & 0.262 & 59.3 & 0.384 & 15.9 & 12.2 & 3 & hei1986a + & & @xmath561.77 & @xmath561.72 & @xmath560.021 & @xmath5639.9 & @xmath560.012 & @xmath5610.8 & @xmath5643.4 & & + 16224@xmath93220 & jsp 691 & 264.96 & 1958.53 & 0.590 & 101.9 & 0.870 & 122.0 & 307.2 & 4 & hei1981a + & & @xmath5643.30 & @xmath560.81 & @xmath560.046 & @xmath562.9 & @xmath560.102 & @xmath562.2 & @xmath564.7 & & + 16229@xmath91701 & chr 54 & 39.89 & 2011.76 & 0.634 & 236.6 & 0.183 & 101.9 & 306.0 & 3 & lin2011c + & & @xmath561.21 & @xmath561.14 & @xmath560.049 & @xmath562.7 & @xmath560.008 & @xmath562.1 & @xmath562.8 & & + 16318@xmath90216 & a 693 & 96.18 & 1991.33 & 0.278 & 220.9 & 0.195 & 129.3 & 344.2 & 2 & hrt2010a + & & @xmath560.89 & @xmath560.68 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath562.2 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath563.8 & & + 16391@xmath93713 & fin 340 ab & 23.99 & 2013.87 & 0.621 & 149.6 & 0.102 & 55.4 & 143.3 & 2 & hrt2012a + & & @xmath560.06 & @xmath560.02 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath560.4 & @xmath560.000 & @xmath560.4 & @xmath560.8 & & + 16544@xmath93806 & hds 2392 & 37.25 & 2010.49 & 0.325 & 166.5 & 0.187 & 60.2 & 321.9 & 5 & + 16589@xmath93737 & see 315 & 38.73 & 1984.63 & 0.154 & 243.9 & 0.186 & 39.4 & 102.4 & 2 & sta1981a + & & @xmath564.48 & @xmath561.11 & @xmath560.106 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath568.6 & @xmath5611.2 & & + 17156@xmath91018 & bu 957 & 90.33 & 1934.61 & 0.554 & 23.0 & 0.296 & 102.0 & 7.0 & 3 & hei1984b + & & @xmath561.52 & @xmath562.41 & @xmath560.067 & @xmath562.1 & @xmath560.013 & @xmath564.6 & @xmath5611.3 & & + 17156@xmath93836 & fin 355 & 14.23 & 1985.97 & 0.476 & 191.9 & 0.249 & 115.3 & 137.2 & 2 & msn2010c + & & @xmath560.03 & @xmath560.06 & @xmath560.010 & @xmath560.6 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.6 & @xmath561.0 & & + 17157@xmath90949 & tok 53 ba , bb & 5.10 & 2010.25 & 0.416 & 349.0 & 0.0305 & 150.0 & 326.3 & 2 & + & & @xmath560.18 & @xmath560.52 & @xmath560.076 & @xmath56556 & @xmath560.0056 & @xmath5635.0 & @xmath5678.0 & & + 17157@xmath90949 & a 2592 ab & 157.60 & 2013.20 & 0.330 & 31.7 & 0.381 & 133.6 & 267.0 & 3 & tok2014a + & & @xmath569.0 & @xmath561.56 & @xmath560.017 & @xmath561.4 & @xmath560.017 & @xmath561.6 & @xmath567.5 & & + 17166@xmath90027 & a 2984 & 140.76 & 1890.53 & 0.866 & 220.5 & 0.959 & 65.1 & 287.5 & 4 & ole1993 + & & @xmath560.23 & @xmath560.36 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.0 & @xmath560.008 & @xmath560.0 & @xmath560.0 & & + 17181@xmath93810 & see 324 & 300.00 & 1997.49 & 0.484 & 249.6 & 0.439 & 106.5 & 42.2 & 5 & + 17283@xmath92058 & a 2244 ab & 44.52 & 2015.23 & 0.578 & 265.5 & 0.168 & 40.2 & 25.0 & 2 & msn1999c + & & @xmath562.18 & @xmath560.26 & @xmath560.044 & @xmath569.7 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath563.9 & @xmath5615.3 & & + 17305@xmath91006 & rst 3978 & 49.24 & 1981.10 & 0.343 & 96.8 & 0.547 & 83.0 & 79.5 & 3 & + & & @xmath561.19 & @xmath561.52 & @xmath560.090 & @xmath561.8 & @xmath560.044 & @xmath562.2 & @xmath567.4 & & + 17471@xmath93807 & i 1336 & 36.06 & 2017.29 & 0.578 & 15.8 & 0.132 & 45.0 & 11.3 & 3 & hei1986b + & & @xmath562.08 & @xmath560.19 & @xmath560.050 & @xmath568.4 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.1 & @xmath5614.2 & & + 18018@xmath690118 & bu 1125 ab & 213.97 & 2028.73 & 0.601 & 161.3 & 0.787 & 55.1 & 66.0 & 4 & hrt2009 + & & @xmath5623.83 & @xmath561.62 & @xmath560.074 & @xmath564.4 & @xmath560.033 & @xmath565.1 & @xmath565.1 & & + 18044@xmath95953 & rst 5099 & 45.64 & 2009.10 & 0.513 & 114.4 & 0.259 & 68.2 & 107.1 & 4 & hrt2010a + & & @xmath562.10 & @xmath560.10 & @xmath560.010 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath562.7 & & + 18092@xmath92211 & rst 3157 & 9.325 & 2015.286 & 0.423 & 250.8 & 0.154 & 49.6 & 54.5 & 3 & hei1990c + & & @xmath560.021 & @xmath560.175 & @xmath560.042 & @xmath566.5 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath565.2 & @xmath566.3 & & + 18171@xmath94336 & hds 2583 & 153.90 & 2016.88 & 0.724 & 58.5 & 0.153 & 129.9 & 24.2 & 4 & + & & @xmath56308.47 & @xmath562.38 & @xmath560.025 & @xmath5615.5 & @xmath560.082 & @xmath5644.0 & @xmath5681.0 & & + 18281@xmath92645 & hds 2615 & 150.28 & 1990.48 & 0.609 & 166.6 & 0.897 & 96.4 & 328.7 & 4 & + & & @xmath56211.19 & @xmath566.64 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath563.2 & @xmath560.366 & @xmath564.2 & @xmath5676.5 & & + 18305@xmath92848 & hds 2624 & 42.93 & 2007.53 & 0.531 & 42.3 & 0.0979 & 144.5 & 14.0 & 3 & + & & @xmath5610.94 & @xmath561.05 & @xmath560.104 & @xmath5622.1 & @xmath560.0211 & @xmath5633.2 & @xmath5624.7 & & + 18323@xmath91439 & chr 73 & 2.774 & 2012.600 & 0.602 & 213.9 & 0.0365 & 135.6 & 2.0 & 3 & ole2005d + & & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.189 & @xmath560.166 & @xmath5610.6 & @xmath560.0053 & @xmath5623.2 & @xmath5622.7 & & + 18439@xmath90649 & ysc 133 & 13.52 & 2002.36 & 0.124 & 97.6 & 0.0787 & 112.1 & 290.2 & 3 & + & & @xmath562.60 & @xmath564.77 & @xmath560.023 & @xmath562.4 & @xmath560.0117 & @xmath563.2 & @xmath5677.4 & & + 18465@xmath90058 & mca 53 aa , ab & 42.48 & 2012.42 & 0.665 & 163.7 & 0.102 & 131.1 & 355.5 & 3 & msn2010c + & & @xmath562.20 & @xmath561.12 & @xmath560.057 & @xmath5621.8 & @xmath560.008 & @xmath5611.3 & @xmath5639.0 & & + 18516@xmath96054 & rst 5126 & 54.16 & 2011.97 & 0.492 & 195.0 & 0.130 & 21.7 & 12.8 & 3 & + & & @xmath563.17 & @xmath560.36 & @xmath560.020 & @xmath5634.5 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath5613.8 & @xmath5636.1 & & usn2002 + 19029@xmath95413 & i 1390 & 47.36 & 2009.65 & 0.682 & 241.2 & 0.198 & 56.0 & 51.0 & 3 & + & & @xmath560.80 & @xmath560.60 & @xmath560.052 & @xmath567.8 & @xmath560.012 & @xmath564.2 & @xmath567.5 & & + 19040@xmath93804 & i 1391 & 47.38 & 2006.14 & 0.641 & 271.3 & 0.178 & 35.8 & 56.4 & 4 & hei1973b + & & @xmath560.22 & @xmath560.23 & @xmath560.019 & @xmath565.2 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath561.3 & @xmath565.7 & & + 19105@xmath95813 & b 2468 & 182.29 & 2013.45 & 0.891 & 168.5 & 0.655 & 140.0 & 5.0 & 5 & + 19155@xmath92515 & b 430 & 19.95 & 2014.98 & 0.506 & 285.1 & 0.132 & 82.1 & 7.5 & 2 & hrt2001b + & & @xmath560.09 & @xmath560.41 & @xmath560.042 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath561.0 & @xmath565.7 & & + 19164@xmath691433 & chr 85 aa , ab & 13.673 & 2008.572 & 0.022 & 242.3 & 0.0583 & 131.3 & 262.7 & 2 & mca1993 + & & @xmath560.069 & @xmath561.101 & @xmath560.010 & @xmath564.5 & @xmath560.0014 & @xmath563.7 & @xmath5628.7 & & + 19194@xmath90136 & hds 2734 aa , ab & 41.19 & 2021.53 & 0.506 & 27.8 & 0.321 & 30.4 & 348.2 & 4 & + & & @xmath565.46 & @xmath562.07 & @xmath560.068 & @xmath5639.7 & @xmath560.018 & @xmath567.2 & @xmath5657.6 & & + 19296@xmath91239 & hu 75 & 129.67 & 2009.47 & 0.652 & 183.1 & 0.496 & 31.5 & 245.3 & 3 & sca2003d + & & @xmath562.70 & @xmath560.29 & @xmath560.012 & @xmath565.9 & @xmath560.013 & @xmath563.4 & @xmath564.7 & & + 19398@xmath92326 & see 389 & 46.20 & 1976.63 & 0.088 & 327.9 & 0.221 & 93.5 & 0.4 & 2 & doc1994a + & & @xmath560.10 & @xmath560.60 & @xmath560.007 & @xmath560.3 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath560.2 & @xmath564.7 & & + 19407@xmath90037 & chr 88 aa , ab & 20.56 & 1996.01 & 0.058 & 185.7 & 0.0854 & 150.8 & 328.1 & 3 & msn2010c + & & @xmath560.14 & @xmath561.04 & @xmath560.030 & @xmath5612.6 & @xmath560.0024 & @xmath567.0 & @xmath5627.5 & & + 19573@xmath690513 & a 604 & 228.15 & 1935.43 & 0.268 & 94.7 & 0.291 & 108.0 & 306.0 & 3 & hei1991 + & & @xmath5617.63 & @xmath565.63 & @xmath560.019 & @xmath561.9 & @xmath560.016 & @xmath561.2 & @xmath5612.2 & & + 19581@xmath94808 & hds 2842 & 32.04 & 2015.65 & 0.807 & 254.7 & 0.273 & 74.1 & 67.2 & 4 & + & & @xmath567.08 & @xmath560.23 & @xmath560.061 & @xmath567.9 & @xmath560.031 & @xmath560.9 & @xmath566.0 & & + 20210@xmath91447 & bla 7 aa , ab & 3.765 & 2015.704 & 0.043 & 34.3 & 0.0665 & 80.9 & 120.0 & 3 & msn1994 + & & * & @xmath560.035 & * & @xmath562.1 & @xmath560.0023 & @xmath563.2 & * & & + 20347@xmath96319 & hu 1615 & 357.17 & 1999.08 & 0.851 & 257.5 & 0.387 & 46.0 & 263.0 & 5 & usn2002 + 20507@xmath93116 & b 997 & 63.67 & 2014.34 & 0.179 & 281.1 & 0.207 & 41.5 & 306.4 & 3 & hrt2010a + & & @xmath5634.66 & @xmath5614.29 & @xmath560.142 & @xmath5627.2 & @xmath560.053 & @xmath568.1 & @xmath56141.1 & & + 20562@xmath93146 & b 1001 & 265.93 & 1969.51 & 0.369 & 187.0 & 0.322 & 131.2 & 219.0 & 4 & usn2002 + & & @xmath5610.98 & @xmath562.93 & @xmath560.021 & @xmath565.1 & @xmath560.016 & @xmath563.7 & @xmath569.4 & & + 21051@xmath690757 & hds 3004 ab & 80.42 & 2016.78 & 0.691 & 88.1 & 0.463 & 58.0 & 48.7 & 4 & lin2012a + & & @xmath56163.73 & @xmath561.39 & @xmath560.062 & @xmath5632.2 & @xmath560.326 & @xmath5621.2 & @xmath5663.5 & & + 21058@xmath95744 & hu 1625 & 560.04 & 2072.29 & 0.000 & 222.1 & 0.657 & 81.6 & 118.5 & 5 & + 21074@xmath90814 & bu 368 ab & 345.28 & 1954.64 & 0.665 & 270.1 & 0.576 & 87.6 & 304.2 & 3 & pal2005b + & & @xmath5615.75 & @xmath561.11 & @xmath560.020 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath560.013 & @xmath560.6 & @xmath561.9 & & + 21158@xmath95316 & fin 329 & 36.04 & 1997.91 & 0.115 & 260.5 & 0.179 & 107.1 & 284.8 & 3 & doc2013d + & & @xmath560.59 & @xmath563.77 & @xmath560.035 & @xmath563.3 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath5629.5 & & + 21243@xmath690343 & a 2288 & 122.72 & 1950.41 & 0.659 & 135.4 & 0.300 & 139.4 & 86.1 & 3 & sca2003e + & & @xmath562.29 & @xmath560.50 & @xmath560.011 & @xmath564.3 & @xmath560.007 & @xmath561.8 & @xmath563.3 & & + 21255@xmath690203 & a 2289 ab & 159.45 & 2008.15 & 0.652 & 141.1 & 0.207 & 111.0 & 51.1 & 4 & usn2002 + & & @xmath5621.43 & @xmath561.85 & @xmath560.025 & @xmath564.2 & @xmath560.013 & @xmath563.1 & @xmath567.1 & & + 21274@xmath90701 & hds 3053 & 20.93 & 2015.86 & 0.349 & 152.8 & 0.166 & 51.1 & 148.5 & 2 & msn2010c + & & @xmath560.84 & @xmath560.35 & @xmath560.043 & @xmath562.2 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath561.7 & @xmath563.3 & & + 21436@xmath91108 & lv 10 & 1219.17 & 2038.43 & 0.494 & 9.1 & 2.039 & 36.2 & 4.2 & 5 & usn2002 + 21477@xmath91813 & chr 223 & 113.86 & 2018.85 & 0.748 & 284.3 & 0.365 & 99.8 & 71.5 & 5 & + 21536@xmath91019 & fin 358 & 49.38 & 1976.32 & 0.770 & 289.4 & 0.0791 & 30.5 & 9.2 & 3 & msn2001c + & & @xmath561.98 & @xmath561.86 & @xmath560.054 & @xmath5640.9 & @xmath560.0025 & @xmath5611.4 & @xmath5649.2 & & + 21552@xmath96153 & hdo 296 ab & 27.94 & 1997.59 & 0.420 & 282.0 & 0.276 & 83.2 & 41.4 & 2 & doc2011f + & & @xmath560.32 & @xmath560.41 & @xmath560.031 & @xmath560.4 & @xmath560.009 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath565.0 & & + 22029@xmath691547 & hds 3129 & 20.57 & 2005.43 & 0.777 & 230.1 & 0.100 & 124.9 & 273.1 & 3 & hor2010 + & & @xmath560.07 & @xmath560.02 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath560.000 & @xmath560.2 & @xmath560.3 & & + 22156@xmath94121 & chr 187 & 25.87 & 2014.92 & 0.386 & 91.6 & 0.201 & 68.8 & 66.7 & 3 & + & & @xmath560.13 & @xmath560.05 & @xmath560.006 & @xmath560.4 & @xmath560.004 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath560.6 & & + 22241@xmath90450 & bu 172 ab & 145.07 & 1987.66 & 0.702 & 113.5 & 0.402 & 161.4 & 296.9 & 2 & doc2007d + & & @xmath561.85 & @xmath560.05 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath563.0 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.7 & @xmath563.0 & & + 22384@xmath90754 & a 2695 & 132.45 & 2027.46 & 0.576 & 285.5 & 0.252 & 76.8 & 47.9 & 3 & hrt2010a + & & @xmath564.91 & @xmath566.74 & @xmath560.039 & @xmath561.4 & @xmath560.022 & @xmath562.8 & @xmath567.8 & & + 22500@xmath93248 & hdo 301 & 26.46 & 2015.07 & 0.516 & 194.6 & 0.184 & 162.9 & 255.8 & 2 & hrt2010a + & & @xmath560.04 & @xmath560.04 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath565.2 & @xmath560.001 & @xmath561.5 & @xmath564.9 & & + 22546@xmath691054 & hds 3257 & 249.14 & 2007.00 & 0.415 & 51.2 & 0.344 & 67.1 & 20.9 & 4 & + & & @xmath5699.01 & @xmath5645.27 & @xmath560.361 & @xmath5618.4 & @xmath560.255 & @xmath5626.0 & @xmath56122.6 & & + 23227@xmath91502 & hu 295 & 64.33 & 2006.96 & 0.148 & 276.3 & 0.406 & 77.8 & 1.6 & 2 & usn1999b + & & @xmath560.31 & @xmath560.45 & @xmath560.003 & @xmath560.3 & @xmath560.002 & @xmath560.5 & @xmath562.9 & & + 23374@xmath690737 & fox 102 ab & 127.12 & 2006.75 & 0.292 & 139.1 & 0.263 & 22.2 & 259.4 & 3 & hrt2014b + & & @xmath563.20 & @xmath560.64 & @xmath560.010 & @xmath566.6 & @xmath560.005 & @xmath562.8 & @xmath567.8 & & + Abstract:
[ "the results of speckle interferometric observations at the soar telescope in 2014 are given . a total of 1641 observations were taken , yielding 1636 measurements of 1218 resolved binary and multiple stars and 577 non - resolutions of 441 targets . we resolved for the first time 56 pairs , including some nearby astrometric or spectroscopic binaries and ten new subsystems in previously known visual binaries . the calibration of the data is checked by linear fits to the positions of 41 wide binaries observed at soar over several seasons . the typical calibration accuracy is 01 in angle and 0.3% in pixel scale , while the measurement errors are on the order of 3mas . the new data are used here to compute 194 binary - star orbits , 148 of which are improvements on previous orbital solutions and 46 are first - time orbits ." ]
19,272
19,272
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the hot gas in clusters of galaxies seems like it should be easy to understand . because of the relatively low ratio of baryons to dark matter , the potential well of a cluster should be dark - matter dominated . the dynamical time within a cluster potential is shorter than a hubble time , so most clusters should be relaxed . also , the cooling time of the vast majority of intracluster gas is longer than a hubble time . it would appear that cluster structure ought to be scale - free , as long as the shape of a cluster s potential well does not depend systematically on its mass . if that were the case , then the global properties of clusters , such as halo mass , luminosity - weighted temperature , and x - ray luminosity , would scale self - similarly ( kaiser 1986 ) . in particular , the gas temperature would scale with cluster mass as @xmath0 and the bolometric x - ray luminosity would scale with temperature as @xmath1 in the bremsstrahlung - dominated regime above @xmath2 . indeed , numerical simulations that include gas dynamics but exclude non - gravitational processes such as radiative cooling and supernova heating produce clusters that obey these scaling laws ( e.g. , evrard , metzler , & navarro 1996 ; bryan & norman 1998 ; thomas 2001b ) . real clusters are not so simple . we have known for a decade that the observed luminosity - temperature relation is closer to @xmath3 ( e.g. , edge & stewart 1991 ) , indicating that non - gravitational processes must influence the density structure of a cluster s core , where most of the luminosity is generated ( kaiser 1991 ; evrard & henry 1991 ; navarro , frenk & white 1995 ; bryan & norman 1998 ) . the mass - temperature relation , on the other hand , seemed like it ought to be more fundamental and less sensitive to non - gravitational effects . yet , observations collected over the last few years indicate that this relation also disagrees with both the scale - free predictions and simulations that exclude non - gravitational processes ( horner , mushotzky , & scharf 1999 ; nevalainen , markevitch , & forman 2000 ; finoguenov , reiprich , & bhringer 2001 ; xu , jin , & wu 2001 ) . these results derive mostly from resolved x - ray and temperature profiles coupled with the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium , but they do seem consistent with gravitational lensing measurements ( allen , schmidt , & fabian 2001 ) . understanding the scaling properties of clusters is of broad importance because these scaling laws are integral to determination of cosmological parameters . for example , the number density of clusters in the local universe reflects the amplitude of matter perturbations on @xmath4 mpc scales ( e.g. , henry & arnaud 1991 ; white , efstathiou , & frenk 1993 ; viana & liddle 1996 ; eke , cole & frenk 1996 ; kitayama & suto 1997 ; oukbir & blanchard 1997 ; henry 2000 ) . in order to measure this amplitude , one needs accurately measured cluster masses . gravitational lensing measurements of cluster mass have grown rapidly in sophistication during the last few years , but x - ray determined cluster temperatures , converted to cluster masses using the mass - temperature relation , remain the most commonly used mass measurement for cosmological studies . thus , any inaccuracies in the mass - temperature relation propagate into uncertainties in cosmological parameters derived from clusters ( e.g. , voit 2000 ) . a number of authors have recently re - evaluated the perturbation amplitude implied by cluster observations using a variety of techniques that circumvent the standard mass - temperature relation ( reiprich & bhringer 2001 ; van waerbeke 2001 ; seljak 2002 ; viana , nichol , & liddle 2002 ) . the results are disconcertingly different from those based on the standard relation , generally implying a much lower power - spectrum amplitude . clearly a better understanding of clusters is needed , and ideally , we would like to know how the present - day properties of clusters are linked to the physics of galaxy formation . the physical processes most likely to break the expected self - similarity of clusters are heating by supernovae or active galactic nuclei and radiative cooling , although other possibilities such as magnetic pressure or cosmic - ray pressure have not been ruled out . a large number of studies have investigated how the structure of the intracluster medium changes when these processes are included . because treating all of these processes in sufficient detail is extremely complicated , various approximations have been employed . these include numerical simulations that administer a particular amount of energy input at early times or adopt some other phenomenological prescription for injecting energy ( e.g. , metzler & evrard 1994 ; navarro , frenk , & white 1995 ; metzler & evrard 1997 ; bialek , evrard , & mohr 2001 ; borgani et al . 2001a ; da silva 2001 ; bryan & voit 2001 ) , analytical models for spherically symmetric accretion of preheated gas ( e.g. , cavaliere , menci & tozzi 1999 ; tozzi & norman 2001 ) , and semi - analytic models that consider the merger and star formation history of clusters ( e.g. , wu , fabian , & nulsen 1998 , 2000 ; balogh , babul , & patton 1999 ; bower 2001 ; babul , balogh , lewis , & poole 2002 ) . most of these papers have focused on heating of the gas , but recent work has also examined the possibility that radiative cooling is primarily responsible ( e.g. , knight & ponman 1997 ; suginohara & ostriker 1998 ; pearce 2000 ; bryan 2000 ; muanwong 2001 ; thomas 2001a ; lewis 2001 ) . two broad conclusions emerge from such studies : ( 1 ) radiative cooling without feedback probably locks too high a fraction of baryons into condensed objects , and ( 2 ) if heating is uniformly distributed , the amount required to produce realistic clusters is quite large , probably exceeding @xmath5 per baryon . introducing this much energy through supernova heating strains the bounds of plausibility , given how many metals are observed in the intracluster medium ( e.g. , balogh , babul , & patton 1999 ; valageas & silk 1999 ; kravtsov & yepes 2000 ; bower 2000 ; although see loewenstein 2000 ) . here , we revisit an approach pioneered by bower ( 1997 ) , focusing on entropy as the most fundamental characteristic of the intracluster medium . analyzing clusters in terms of entropy has two advantages . the first is that convection within clusters acts as an entropy - sorting device , shuttling low - entropy material to the cluster core and high - entropy material to the cluster s outskirts . convective stability is achieved when specific entropy becomes a monotonically increasing function of radius . thus , if we can determine the entropy distribution of the gas in a cluster and we know the structure of its dark - matter halo , we can predict the structure of that cluster in its relaxed state . in the idealized cases that we will consider , we will assume that clusters are spherically symmetric , dark - matter dominated , in hydrostatic equilibrium , and in convective equilibrium . the second advantageous property of entropy is that , in the absence of non - gravitational processes , the entropy distribution of a cluster can be readily computed using either hydrodynamical simulations or spherically symmetric analytical models . then , the effects of non - gravitational heating and radiative cooling can be implemented as modifications of that entropy distribution . in voit & bryan ( 2001 ) , we introduced a simple scheme for computing cluster models , taking advantage of these properties of the intracluster entropy distribution to show how heating and cooling conspire to produce a cluster @xmath6-@xmath7 relation quite similar to what is observed . this paper explores those modified - entropy models in more detail , showing that the observable properties of these model clusters are quite similar to those of real clusters on many counts . section 2 describes how we construct those models and analyzes how cluster properties depend on both halo concentration and entropy modification . section 3 uses relations between halo mass and halo concentration to define sets of cluster models determined entirely by the underlying cosmology . we then compare the model clusters with observations of the surface - brightness profiles of clusters , the temperature gradients of clusters , the mass - temperature relation , and the luminosity - temperature relation . in every case , our models reproduce the observations , with little need for adjustable parameters . in section 4 , we explore how the present - day intracluster entropy distribution emerges from hierarchical cosmological models . section 5 summarizes our conclusions . in this section we develop a family of modified - entropy models of clusters based on two parameters , one specifying the concentration of the cluster s dark - matter halo and the other specifying the entropy level at which cooling and feedback modify the intracluster entropy distribution . we begin by casting the equilibrium equations in dimensionless form and selecting appropriate boundary conditions . then we assume that the unmodified entropy distribution determined by gravitational processes alone would produce a gas density distribution similar to the dark - matter density distribution . because the innermost gas in such a cluster can cool in much less than a hubble time , we proceed to investigate several potential modifications of the entropy distribution by radiative cooling and subsequent feedback . in each case , we show how both entropy modification and the shape of the underlying dark - matter halo affect the surface - brightness profile of a cluster , its luminosity - weighted temperature , its temperature gradient , and its x - ray luminosity . two important results emerge from this analysis : ( 1 ) the temperature of a cluster of a given mass is determined primarily by halo concentration and is affected only modestly by entropy modification , and ( 2 ) altering the intracluster entropy distribution at the scale set by radiative cooling leads to an @xmath8-@xmath7 relation that has the observed slope at @xmath9 and that evolves very little with time . the equilibrium structure of the intracluster medium is determined by three things , the gravitational potential of the cluster s dark matter , the entropy distribution of the cluster s gas , and the confining pressure at the outer boundary of the cluster . in order to solve for that structure , one must integrate the equations of hydrostatic equilibrium and gas mass conservation , @xmath10 using the equation of state @xmath11 , where @xmath12 is the adiabatic index and @xmath13 specifies the adiabat of the gas . in this system of equations , @xmath14 is the total mass within radius @xmath15 , @xmath16 is the gas mass within that radius , and the other symbols have their usual meanings . throughout this paper , we will assume that the gas mass is gravitationally negligible and that @xmath17 , as appropriate for an ideal monatomic gas . in a sufficiently relaxed cluster , convection ensures that @xmath18 monotonically increases with radius . thus , if one knows @xmath19 , the entropy distribution of the intracluster medium expressed in terms of the mass of gas with @xmath20 , then one can use the inverse relation @xmath21 to solve the equilibrium equations that determine the cluster s structure . because this crucial quantity @xmath13 is so closely related to specific entropy , we will often refer to it as the `` entropy '' of the gas , even though the standard thermodynamic entropy per particle for an ideal monatomic gas is @xmath22 we can gain insight into the key parameters that control the structure of the intracluster medium by investigating a family of dimensionless models for clusters in hydrostatic and convective equilibrium . because the virial radius of a cluster lies close to the radius @xmath23 within which the mean matter density of the cluster is 200 times the critical density @xmath24 , we elect to represent radii in terms of @xmath25 and gas density in terms of @xmath26 , where @xmath27 and @xmath28 is the fractional contribution of baryons to the total mass of the universe . one can then rewrite the equilibrium equations in dimensionless form as follows : @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the virial mass , @xmath31 is the temperature in energy units is absorbed into @xmath7 throughout the paper . ] of the corresponding singular isothermal sphere , @xmath32 $ ] is the dimensionless pressure , @xmath33 is the dimensionless mass within @xmath34 , and @xmath35 is the fraction of a cluster s baryons in the intracluster medium within radius @xmath34 . the corresponding dimensionless entropy distribution is @xmath36 $ ] , and we will also make use of the quantity @xmath37 . general solutions to these equations can be found for a few idealized cases . for example , if the potential is a singular isothermal sphere and the gas is also isothermal , then we have @xmath38 , @xmath39 , and @xmath40 for a monatomic ideal gas . if instead the mass profile follows the form of navarro , frenk & white ( 1997 ; nfw hereafter ) , with @xmath41 $ ] where @xmath42 is the concentration parameter , then the equation of hydrostatic equilibrium becomes ( see wu , fabian , & nulsen 2000 ) @xmath43^{-1 } \frac { d } { d\hat{r } } \left [ \frac { \ln ( 1+c\hat{r } ) } { \hat{r } } \right ] \ ; \ ; .\ ] ] given an isentropic gas in which @xmath44 we thus obtain @xmath45^{3/2}$ ] , where @xmath46 is a constant of integration . a particular solution to the equilibrium equations can be found by choosing @xmath47 and @xmath48 at the origin and integrating outwards . the gas mass fraction at the origin is always zero by definition , but there is some freedom in the choice of @xmath49 . any given choice of @xmath50 corresponds to a unique icm structure with a unique luminosity and temperature profile , but which solutions are the physical ones ? here is where the confining pressure comes into play . it is generally assumed that accreting matter confines the icm in the neighborhood of @xmath23 . the pressure at @xmath23 would then be determined by the ram pressure of the infalling matter . now suppose that @xmath51 has been modified by non - gravitational processes . for example , heating might drive gas out of the cluster potential , pushing the accretion shock to a radius beyond @xmath23 . alternatively , cooling and condensation might reduce the total gas mass of the intracluster medium so that the accretion shock moves inward . in either case the radius at which the integration of hydrostatic equilibrium should terminate differs from @xmath23 . so what is the termination radius @xmath52 at which @xmath53 equals the total uncondensed gas mass , and what is the pressure at that radius ? in a freely falling accretion flow with a constant mass flux , the density should vary as @xmath54 , where @xmath55 is the free - fall velocity from @xmath56 in an nfw potential . we therefore assume that the accretion pressure scales with radius as @xmath57 , and we normalize that pressure to equal the unmodified nfw value ( see [ unmod ] ) at @xmath58 . various choices of @xmath59 will lead to pressure profiles that intersect @xmath60 at different values of @xmath61 , each corresponding to a unique value of @xmath62 determined by a particular integration . the correct solution is the one that gives the proper value for the uncondensed gas mass at the radius where the gas pressure equals the accretion pressure . in practice , the physically reasonable solutions are not particularly sensitive to the outer boundary condition . in the models that follow , applying the boundary condition @xmath63 at @xmath58 would lead to similar results . however , the value of @xmath48 derived at @xmath64 using this boundary condition is not physically significant and can even be inconsistent with models in which cooling and condensation significantly reduce the maximum value of @xmath48 . one example of a physically _ unreasonable _ boundary condition is requiring @xmath65 at @xmath58 . such a requirement does not allow intracluster gas to expand beyond @xmath23 even when heating substantially raises the intracluster entropy . in the limit of extreme heating , this condition therefore artificially boosts the central pressure , density , and temperature , leading to an unphysically large cluster luminosity . once a correct solution has been identified , one can compute two quantities that correspond to the dimensionless luminosity and luminosity - weighted temperature : @xmath66 as long as the cooling function @xmath67 remains sufficiently constant within the gas contributing the bulk of the luminosity , the actual luminosity - weighted temperature is @xmath68 , and the bolometric x - ray luminosity is @xmath69 where @xmath70 . scaling to a 10 kev cluster at @xmath9 gives @xmath71 where @xmath72 . the emission - measure profile and emissivity - weighted temperature profile are also of interest . thus , we define the following dimensionless analogs as functions of the projected radius @xmath73 : @xmath74 where @xmath75 is the dimensionless distance along the line of sight . before exploring the consequences of modifying the entropy of intracluster gas , we need to know what the entropy distribution would be if it were not modified . to simplify matters , we will assume that the underlying dark matter profile of the cluster is of nfw form with some concentration parameter @xmath42 . this parameter typically ranges from @xmath76 for hot clusters to @xmath77 for groups of galaxies ( see [ conparam ] ) . if the intracluster medium were collisionless , then its density profile would be identical to that of the dark matter . thus , we define the unmodified entropy distribution @xmath78 of a cluster of concentration @xmath42 to be that of gas in hydrostatic equilibrium in the cluster potential with a density profile identical to that of the dark matter . numerical experiments reveal that the entropy distribution of intracluster gas in clusters simulated without radiative cooling or supernova heating is quite similar to the nfw form throughout most of the cluster but is elevated above nfw within the cluster s core . figure [ denprofs ] shows the density distribution of a cluster simulated with an adaptive - mesh refinement code ( norman & bryan 1998 ; bryan 1999 ) for the santa barbara cluster comparision project ( frenk 1999 ) . the dotted line labeled `` nfw '' shows an nfw density distribution with @xmath79 , which is very close to the underlying dark - matter distribution of the cluster . the dashed line labeled `` simulation '' shows the gas - density distribution from that same simulation . agreement is quite close outside 10% of the virial radius , but the gas density levels off within that radius , implying that the lowest - entropy gas has a somewhat higher entropy than assumed in our unmodified distribution @xmath80 . however , this discrepancy at the low - entropy end of the distribution is inconsequential to the modified - entropy models that follow because the entropy of the discrepant gas will always be subject to further modification . the unmodified distribution is also somewhat discrepant with simulations at the high - entropy end . assuming hydrostatic equilibrium and an nfw gas - density law near the virial radius leads to gas temperatures that are 20 - 30% higher than those in our fiducial simulation . thus , our unmodified entropy levels at large radii are slightly higher than what a numerical simulation would produce . however , in order to properly reproduce the density profile near the virial radius in a hydrostatic model , we must retain these elevated entropy levels . this overestimate at the cluster s outskirts has virtually no effect on emissivity - weighted global quantities , such as @xmath6 and @xmath81 , but if one is interested in the temperature of cluster gas near @xmath23 , then departures from hydrostatic equilibrium , which are outside the scope of our models , must be taken into account . modification of this baseline entropy distribution is inevitable because clusters simulated without radiative cooling are physically inconsistent . in general , the gas at the center of such a simulated cluster can radiate many times its thermal energy within a hubble time , resulting in cluster luminosities that vastly exceed those observed ( e.g. , muanwong 2001 ; bryan & voit 2001 ) . condensation and removal of the lowest - entropy gas from the intracluster medium must happen at some level , because that is how the cluster s galaxies form stars . furthermore , the most massive of these stars must explode , resulting in supernova feedback . condensed gas accreting onto an active galactic nucleus can provide additional feedback ( heinz , reynolds , & begelman 1998 ; kaiser & alexander 1999 ; quilis , bower , & balogh 2001 ; reynolds , heinz , & begelman 2002 ; bhringer 2002 ) . all of these processes will modify the entropy distribution of the intracluster medium , but modeling them in detail is a daunting task . because the physics of feedback is so complex , we shall adopt a highly simplistic phenomenological approach to entropy modification . instead of trying to model all the consequences of heating and cooling we will restrict our investigation to three qualitatively different modifications of the entropy distribution @xmath80 : ( 1 ) truncation of the distribution , ( 2 ) shifting of the distribution , and ( 3 ) radiative losses from the distribution . each of these modifications depends on a single entropy threshold parameter @xmath82 , which we take to be the entropy at which the cooling time of gas of temperature @xmath83 equals the age of the universe . thus , for each type of entropy modification , we obtain a two - parameter family of modified - entropy models specified by a concentration @xmath42 and a dimensionless entropy @xmath84 . as in voit & bryan ( 2001 ) , we use an approximate cooling function for gas with a metallicity of one - third solar to determine the appropriate entropy threshold . according to this approximation , the threshold for cooling within 15 gyr can be expressed as @xmath85 with @xmath86 for @xmath87 and @xmath88 for @xmath89 . converting this threshold to dimensionless units yields @xmath90 as long as @xmath91 ( see [ emodtemp ] ) , then @xmath92 will be appropriate for the hottest clusters ( @xmath93 ) and @xmath94 will be appropriate for the coolest ( @xmath95 ) groups . one simple yet physically motivated way to modify the entropy distribution of intracluster gas is to truncate it at @xmath84 ( bryan 2000 ; voit & bryan 2001 ) . mathematically , we define the truncated distribution to be @xmath96 where @xmath97 is defined by @xmath98 . such a modification corresponds to removing all the gas with a cooling time less than a hubble time and ignoring the effects of cooling on the rest of the intracluster medium . this type of modification can viewed either as an extreme form of cooling , in which all the gas below the critical threshold condenses , or an extreme form of heating , in which all the gas below the threshold is heated to very high entropy ( @xmath99 ) and convects beyond the virial radius of the cluster . figure [ denprofs ] shows some gas density profiles resulting from different values of @xmath84 . the thin solid line labeled @xmath100 in figure [ kdist ] shows the truncated entropy distribution for @xmath101 and @xmath102 . notice that the maximum value of @xmath48 in these truncated models is less than unity because some of the gas has been removed from the intracluster medium . the thick solid line in figure [ rmax ] illustrates how the fraction @xmath103 of a cluster s baryons that remain in the intracluster medium depends on @xmath84 . for hot clusters this fraction is @xmath10490% , but for cool groups it drops below 50% . nevertheless , the outer radius @xmath61 of the intracluster gas remains close to @xmath23 , even when @xmath105 drops below 0.5 . figure [ denprofs ] shows the reason . as the entropy threshold for truncation rises , the central entropy of the cluster also rises the resulting density profile is therefore much flatter for large values of @xmath106 , enabling a smaller amount of gas + to fill a similar volume . note also that the density profile of a modified - entropy model with @xmath101 and @xmath107 is quite similar to that of a @xmath79 cluster simulated without cooling and feedback , suggesting that the cooling threshold may have only a modest effect on the structure of the hottest clusters . another way to modify intracluster entropy is to add a constant term @xmath84 to the unmodified entropy distribution ( voit & bryan 2001 ) . this type of modification is a convenient way to mimic `` preheated '' models for cluster formation that inject a fixed amount of entropy per particle into the intergalactic medium at some early time . in this case , the modified entropy distribution is defined by @xmath108 the dotted line in figure [ kdist ] shows this distribution for @xmath79 and @xmath102 . because entropy has been added but no gas has been removed , the outer radius for models with a shifted entropy distribution extends beyond the usual virial radius ( see figure [ rmax ] ) . qualitatively , this corresponds to heating that inflates the intracluster medium , driving the accretion shock to larger radii . comparing the structure of shifted models to truncated models reveals interesting similarities . figure [ denprofs_all ] depicts the dimensionless density profiles for @xmath109 , 0.3 , and 1.0 in clusters with @xmath79 . the run of density with radius is virtually identical for the shifted and truncated models when @xmath109 and is still quite similar when @xmath102 . thus , for most of the interesting range of entropy thresholds , there is little observable difference between shifted models and truncated models . however , as @xmath84 rises to 1.0 , the density profile of the shifted model becomes noticeably flatter than that of the truncated model . similarity between the truncated and shifted models at the lower entropy thresholds arises because the unmodified entropy @xmath110 depends approximately linearly on @xmath48 for small @xmath106 . thus , shifting the distribution by @xmath84 and truncating it at @xmath84 both produce similar modified entropy distributions and therefore similar density , temperature , and pressure distributions in the inner regions of the cluster . that is why entropy modification by heating and cooling can have similar effects on the luminosity and temperature of clusters as long as they establish similar values of the minimum entropy . observations show that many clusters contain gas with a cooling time less than a hubble time ( fabian 1994 ) , motivating us to consider slightly more complicated modifications to the entropy distribution . radiative cooling reduces the the specific entropy of a gas parcel according to @xmath111 this entropy equation can be rewritten to eliminate the dependence on gas density : @xmath112 in general , the rate at which entropy declines will depend on the prevailing hydrodynamic conditions , standard examples being isobaric cooling or isochoric cooling . however , for the purposes of this toy model , let us assume that the right - hand side of this equation remains constant . we make this rather arbitrary assumption for two physical reasons . first , within the temperature range @xmath113 , the quantity @xmath114 is approximately constant . second , as gas settles within a nearly isothermal potential , work done by compression will attempt to maintain the temperature of that gas near the characteristic temperature of the halo . thus , we are motivated to use the following modification to represent radiative losses : @xmath115^{3/2 } - \hat{k}_c^{3/2 } \}^{2/3 } \ ; \ ; .\ ] ] this modification corresponds to reducing the value of @xmath116 by the constant amount @xmath117 throughout the entropy distribution and discarding all the gas with @xmath118 . the short - dashed line in figure [ kdist ] shows an example of the resulting distribution for @xmath79 and @xmath102 , and a similar line in figure [ rmax ] shows how the maximum radius depends on @xmath84 . it will also be interesting to investigate a generalization of this radiative - loss model : @xmath119^{\alpha } - \hat{k}_c^{\alpha } \}^{1/\alpha } \ ; \ ; , \ ] ] in which the tunable parameter @xmath120 enables us to adjust the amount of gas below the cooling threshold . in the limit @xmath121 , this generalized distribution becomes identical to the truncated distribution . in what follows , we will focus on the intermediate case of @xmath122 , represented by the symbol @xmath123 and long - dashed lines in the relevant figures . figure [ denprofs_all ] compares the density distributions that result from the radiative - loss models with the truncated and shifted models . for @xmath109 , all the density profiles are very similar at @xmath124 , because the entropy profiles are nearly identical there . however , within that radius , entropy in the radiative - loss models drops below @xmath84 , allowing for considerably greater compression and higher central density . this trend becomes more pronounced at higher @xmath84 because the proportion of the intracluster medium below the cooling threshold is even larger . modified - entropy models generated through shifts and truncations of the unmodified entropy distribution produce surface - brightness profiles that are strikingly similar to the @xmath125-model profiles of many real clusters , at least within about 30% of the virial radius . figure [ sbright ] shows the dimensionless emission measure @xmath126 as a function of projected radius @xmath34 for three different truncated models , each with @xmath79 . as the threshold entropy progresses from @xmath109 , characteristic of clusters , through @xmath102 to @xmath127 , characteristic of groups , the @xmath128 profile substantially flattens . as long as @xmath67 does not change dramatically with radius , these emission - measure profiles will be nearly identical to the surface - brightness profiles . for comparision , figure [ sbright ] also shows some @xmath125-model profiles selected to match the modified - entropy models . these @xmath125-model profiles are defined by @xmath129^{-3\beta + 1/2}$ ] , where @xmath130 is the core radius and @xmath125 determines the asymptotic slope ( cavaliere & fusco - femiano 1978 ) . in each case , the @xmath125-model closely tracks the modified - entropy model within @xmath131 . beyond that radius , the emission measures of the @xmath125-models exceed those of the modified - entropy models , but owing to the low surface brightness at large radii , the @xmath125-model parameters of clusters and groups have generally been measured within @xmath132 . recent measurements by vikhlinin , forman , & jones ( 1999 ) suggest that cluster surface brightness does indeed fall below the best fitting @xmath125-model near the virial radius . in order to determine how the best - fitting @xmath125 and @xmath130 depend on @xmath42 and @xmath84 , we performed surface - brightness weighted fits over a grid of modified entropy models . because the best - fit parameters depend somewhat on the portion of the profile being fitted , we elected to do these fits over two different radial intervals : @xmath133 and @xmath134 . results for truncated ( @xmath100 ) models are shown in figure [ betafits_t ] , and those for shifted ( @xmath135 ) models are shown in figure [ betafits_s ] . because the profiles in the shifted models tend to be shallower , the corresponding @xmath125 values are somewhat smaller , particularly for low values of @xmath84 . however , in both cases , the best - fitting @xmath125 values span the observed range for clusters and groups of galaxies ( see [ sec - sbprofs ] ) . one consequence of raising the core entropy of a cluster is a boost in the luminosity - weighted temperature of the intracluster gas . figure [ tprofs ] shows that increasing @xmath84 raises the temperature of gas at all radii in both the shifted and truncated models . amplification of the central temperature can be quite extreme , exceeding @xmath136 when @xmath84 rises to 1.0 . however , the resulting enhancement of the luminosity - weighted temperature is not nearly as dramatic . the value of @xmath137 turns out to depend more critically on the concentration parameter @xmath42 than on the entropy threshold , as demonstrated in figure [ tlums_ts ] . the reason that raising the core entropy of gas in an nfw potential has only a modest effect on its luminosity - weighted temperature involves both the gas density profile and the dark - matter density profile . extra entropy flattens the density profile of intracluster gas , diminishing the relative luminosity of gas in the core . the characteristic radius of gas contributing the bulk of the cluster s luminosity therefore moves outward . because the shape of an nfw halo is steeper than isothermal at @xmath138 , the characteristic temperature of gas within such a halo declines outside that radius ( see figure [ tprofs ] ) . thus , the rise in gas temperature resulting from an increase in @xmath84 is largely offset by an increased contribution to the total luminosity from lower - temperature gas at larger radii . this effect is most pronounced in the shifted models , which have substantial amounts of relatively cool gas beyond @xmath58 . in those models , @xmath137 actually _ declines _ as @xmath84 approaches unity . the large central temperatures in the shifted and truncated cases also seem somewhat unrealistic in light of observations showing either level or radially increasing temperature gradients within cluster cores ( e.g. , arnaud 2001a , b ; allen 2001 ) . in order to compare these temperatures more directly with observations , we must look at @xmath139 , the luminosity - weighted temperature along various lines of sight through a cluster . figure [ tperp_03 ] illustrates how @xmath139 depends on projected radius @xmath73 in clusters with @xmath79 , @xmath102 , and four different kinds of entropy modification . projected temperatures at @xmath140 in both the shifted and truncated models are still quite high ( @xmath141 ) . however , the core temperatures in the radiative - loss models look more like those in real clusters ( see [ sec - tinner ] ) , rising with radius in the innermost regions and peaking between @xmath142 and @xmath143 at @xmath144 in these particular models . cool gas in the cores of clusters with entropy modified through radiative losses can significantly affect the luminosity - weighted temperature if the fraction of gas below @xmath84 is relatively large . figure [ tlums_r ] shows that @xmath137 for a given concentration @xmath42 and entropy threshold @xmath84 is @xmath10430% lower in the standard radiative - loss model ( @xmath145 ) than in the corresponding truncated model . this effect is also present but not nearly so strong in the generalized radiative - loss model with @xmath122 , where @xmath137 is @xmath10410% lower than in the truncated models ( see figure [ tlums_ta ] ) . all of our schemes for entropy modification substantially lower the luminosities of clusters . figure [ lints_8 ] shows how dimensionless luminosity @xmath146 depends on the entropy threshold @xmath84 for clusters with @xmath79 . in all cases , luminosity declines by over an order of magnitude as @xmath84 rises from 0.1 to 1 this decline is shallowest for the shifted model because the additional gas at large radii contributes significantly to the total luminosity when @xmath147 . note also that @xmath146 is over twice as large in the standard radiative - loss case ( @xmath145 ) because a large proportion of the luminosity in such models comes from the dense core . luminosity enhancement in the @xmath148 radiative - loss model is more moderate only a few tens of percent greater than in the truncated case . analyzing how @xmath146 depends on @xmath84 leads to some important insights into how the cooling threshold determines the luminosity - temperature relation of clusters and groups . figure [ lints_tx ] shows that @xmath149 is a good approximation to the @xmath146-@xmath84 relation for truncated models in the range @xmath150 . this scaling reflects the asymptotic slope of the nfw density profile . notice that the outer portions of the density profiles in figure [ denprofs ] track the underlying nfw profile of the dark matter , and the inner portions are nearly isentropic with @xmath151 . one can therefore approximate the density profile of a truncated model by joining an isentropic density profile to an nfw profile at the radius @xmath152 at which the density of the unmodified nfw profile is @xmath153 . the analytical isentropic solution from [ dimensionless ] tells us that @xmath154^{3/2}$ ] within @xmath152 , so the luminosity from the isentropic gas scales @xmath155 . the luminosity from the nfw portion of the profile scales in the same way for the radii of interest . thus , for larger values of @xmath34 , where the density of the nfw profile approaches @xmath156 , we have @xmath157 . this particular scaling of @xmath146 with @xmath84 has some very interesting consequences . section [ integrated ] showed that the physical luminosity of a cluster scales as @xmath158 . in order to substitute physical quantities for @xmath146 , we need to recognize that @xmath159 and that @xmath160 , where @xmath161 is the age of the universe . we therefore obtain @xmath162 where @xmath163 is the hubble constant at time @xmath161 . the following three features of this expression are particularly noteworthy : * the power - law slope it predicts for the x - ray @xmath164 relation is very close to the observed slope of @xmath165 ( e.g. , markevitch 1998 ; arnaud & evrard 1999 ) . because the halos of low - temperature groups have higher concentrations than high - temperature clusters ( see [ conparam ] ) , we expect @xmath137 to decline by a factor @xmath166 as @xmath81 rises by an order of magnitude . this dependence on concentration steepens the power - law slope implied by equation ( [ ltscal ] ) to @xmath167 . * the @xmath6-@xmath7 relation does not depend on the form of the cooling function , which scales as @xmath168 in the free - free cooling regime at @xmath87 and as @xmath169 in the line - cooling regime at @xmath170 . if the entropy threshold in real clusters did not depend on @xmath171 , then we would expect a distinct steepening of the @xmath6-@xmath7 relation as @xmath7 rises through @xmath2 , which is not observed . equation ( [ ltscal ] ) is indepedent of @xmath171 because the dimensionless gas mass within @xmath152 scales @xmath172 , and thus remains approximately constant in an nfw halo for @xmath173 . the cooling time of that gas is @xmath174 , so its physical luminosity scales @xmath175 . this scaling law also applies to the entire cluster , because the luminosity of gas outside @xmath152 scales in lockstep with gas inside @xmath152 . applying the relation @xmath176 thus leads back to equation ( [ ltscal ] ) , except for the @xmath137 factor . * finally , the @xmath6-@xmath7 relation implied by equation ( [ ltscal ] ) changes very little with time , again in agreement with observations ( mushotzky & scharf 1997 ; donahue 1999 ; della ceca 2000 ; borgani 2001b ) . that happens because the mass of a cluster of a given temperature declines @xmath177 with increasing redshift . according to the @xmath178 scaling , the resulting decline in the intracluster gas mass compensates almost precisely for the drop in the cooling threshold owing to the shorter cooling time @xmath161 . this scaling breaks down at the low - temperature end , where @xmath179 , because the entire intracluster ( or intragroup ) medium in the truncated and shifted cases becomes effectively isentropic . then , the gas density determined by the cooling threshold is @xmath180 , and the luminosity from within @xmath23 scales as @xmath181 . thus , we should expect the @xmath6-@xmath7 relation for low - temperature halos to be steeper than for clusters , roughly @xmath182 for @xmath183 , and we should expect the luminosity of objects at a given temperature to increase with time . in order to make further progress , we will need to understand how halo concentration depends on halo mass . the previous section explored the properties of dimensionless modified - entropy models for clusters depending on two parameters , the halo concentration parameter @xmath42 and an entropy - threshold parameter @xmath84 . as in voit & bryan ( 2001 ) , we argued that the crucial entropy threshold should be the entropy level at which intracluster gas would cool in a hubble time . now we will use a set of relations between halo concentration and halo mass to construct modified - entropy models for real clusters . in these models , the halo mass @xmath184 determines the concentration parameter @xmath42 . the mass and halo concentration then set the temperature of the cluster , and this temperature sets the level of the entropy threshold @xmath82 . cluster properties are therefore determined primarily by the overall cosmological model , because it fixes the global baryon fraction , the relation between halo mass and concentration , and the hubble time that governs @xmath185 . some of a cluster s properties , such as the temperature of the innermost gas , also depend on the chosen scheme for entropy modification . the properties of the resulting modified - entropy models turn out to be remarkably similar to those of observed clusters and groups . the section begins by defining the @xmath184-@xmath42 relations we will use and comparing them to some of the scarce data . then , we explore the structure of the intracluster medium in our modified - entropy cluster models , showing that the observed relationship between @xmath125 and @xmath81 may be more than just a selection effect and demonstrating how entropy modification can lead to temperature profiles similar to those observed in both the inner and outer regions of clusters . we go on to compare the mass - temperature relation from our modified - entropy models to observations , showing that the models reproduce the observational results of nevalainen ( 2000 ) and finoguenov ( 2001 ) . we also compare the @xmath8-@xmath81 relation from our models to cluster data , again showing excellent agreement . much of the dispersion of this relation , in both the models and the data , stems from differences in the amount of gas below the cooling threshold , and we conclude with some speculations about what governs these differences . the concentration of a dark matter halo is determined by its formation history . early formation generally leads to a denser core and thus a higher concentration . low - mass halos , which tend to collapse earlier in time , are therefore expected to be somewhat more concentrated than high - mass halos . because a halo s collapse and merger history determines its concentration , the relation between concentration and halo mass depends on the underlying cosmological model , specified by the matter density @xmath186 , the dark - energy density @xmath187 , the normalization @xmath188 of the perturbation spectrum , and the shape of that spectrum , often parameterized by @xmath189 ( bardeen 1986 ; sugiyama 1995 ) . in this paper , we will restrict our attention to currently - favored @xmath171cdm models , in which the resulting clusters turn out to be thoroughly consistent with observations . several versions of the concentration parameter @xmath190 can be found in the literature , each defined with respect to a radius @xmath191 within which the mean halo density is @xmath192 . here we will define @xmath42 with respect to @xmath23 , in order to be consistent with the models developed in the previous section ; thus , @xmath193 . figure [ c200 ] shows various relations between halo mass and @xmath194 that can be found in the lit- erature . the _ chandra _ observations of allen ( 2001 ) suggest that concentrations corresponding to @xmath195 are appropriate for massive ( @xmath196 ) clusters . concentrations of groups are less certain because they are more model - dependent , and the dispersion in @xmath194 is expected to increase at lower halo masses ( afshordi & cen 2002 ) . in this section , we will adopt the halo mass - concentration relations predicted by models @xmath197 and @xmath198 from eke , navarro , & steinmetz ( 2001 ) , which are consistent with the _ chandra _ data on massive clusters . both models are derived from @xmath199-body simulations of @xmath171cdm cosmologies with @xmath200 , @xmath201 , and @xmath202 . the power spectrum in each model has a shape parameter @xmath203 , but the normalization of the power spectrum differs : @xmath204 in model @xmath197 and @xmath205 in model @xmath198 . the higher normalization in model @xmath198 leads to halos that are about 30% more concentrated . figure [ kc_m200 ] shows the dependence of @xmath84 on halo mass that follows from model @xmath198 ; the entropy thresholds for model @xmath197 are very similar . the cluster models we analyze in this section are completely determined by the assumed relationship between halo mass and concentration ( either @xmath197 or @xmath198 ) and the chosen scheme for entropy modification ( @xmath206 , @xmath207 , @xmath208 , or @xmath209 ) . for each halo mass , we compute the bolometric x - ray luminosity @xmath8 , luminosity - weighted temperature @xmath81 , x - ray surface - brightness profile @xmath210 , and projected temperature profile @xmath211 . unlike in [ integrated ] , each integral includes a cooling function @xmath67 drawn from the models of raymond & smith ( 1977 ) for gas with 30% solar metallicity . we will first focus on the spatially resolved properties of these model clusters , showing how their surface - brightness profiles and temperature gradients compare with those of observed clusters . modified - entropy models of groups tend to have flatter surface - brightness profiles than hot clusters , in accordance with observations ( e.g. , ponman 1999 ; horner 1999 ) . because the surface - brightness profiles of both real clusters and our modified - entropy models are well described by @xmath125-models with @xmath212^{-3\beta + 1/2}$ ] inside of @xmath213 ( see [ emodsb ] ) , we compare our models with the data by comparing the best - fitting @xmath125-model parameters . figure [ bmods ] shows how @xmath125 and @xmath130 depend on @xmath81 in truncated modified - entropy models with relation @xmath198 and in the cluster data of finoguenov ( 2001 ) . the models reproduce the observed range of both parameters and the observed rise in each parameter with increasing temperature . however , the observed dispersion in each parameter at a given temperature is quite large . wu & xue ( 2002 ) find the same kind of temperature dependence in their cluster models , based on the work of bryan ( 2000 ) , which are very similar to the truncated models developed in this paper . some of the dispersion in @xmath125 and @xmath130 at a given temperature may stem from selection effects . because the surface - brightness profiles of modified - entropy clusters continually steepen with radius , unlike those of @xmath125-models , the best - fitting @xmath125 and @xmath130 depend somewhat on the range of radii being fit . figure [ bmods ] shows that the best - fitting values of @xmath125 and @xmath130 both decline as the surface - brightness threshold of the fit rises from @xmath214 through @xmath215 to @xmath216 @xmath217 . this effect is more severe for groups than for clusters because their overall surface brightness is smaller . the figure also shows that fits over the radial range @xmath218 yield slightly larger @xmath125 and @xmath130 than fits over @xmath219 . komatsu & seljak ( 2001 ) noted a similar surface - brightness selection effect in their polytropic models for clusters . however , the rise of @xmath125 with @xmath81 in their models is entirely due to this surface - brightness bias . in our models , it is largely a consequence of the greater impact of entropy modification on groups . puzzlingly , this selection effect becomes stronger at low surface brightness levels in the models of wu & xue ( 2002 ) , perhaps because their boundary condition leads to a less precipitous decline in @xmath220 near the virial radius . the observed dispersion in @xmath125 and @xmath130 may also depend in part on the amount of gas below the cooling threshold . figure [ bmods_all ] illustrates how @xmath125 and @xmath130 depend on the scheme for entropy modification . shifted models have core radii identical to those of the corresponding truncated models and slightly smaller values of @xmath125 . however , allowing for radiative losses reduces the best - fitting core radius by a factor of @xmath221 and flattens the @xmath125-@xmath81 relation , yielding @xmath222 for fits over the interval @xmath223 . other possible sources of dispersion include ellipticity and cluster substructure , which can not be investigated in the context of our spherically symmetric models . the temperature gradient within @xmath224 also appears to depend on the amount of gas below the cooling threshold . figure [ tinner ] , in which the model parameters are appropriate for hot clusters , shows that @xmath211 gradually declines with radius when the entropy distribution is simply truncated at the entropy threshold . our radiative - loss models , in contrast , have temperatures that rise outward from @xmath225 , then flatten , becoming virtually isothermal out to 30% of the virial radius . as the parameter @xmath120 drops from the very large values characteristic of truncated models to the canonical radiative - loss value of 3/2 , the region with a positive temperature gradient becomes progressively larger . the run of temperature with radius in our model with @xmath226 is very similar to the `` universal '' temperature profile observed by allen ( 2001 ) in clusters that appear to have strong cooling flows . in order to facilitate comparison of our models with that data , figure [ tinner ] shows radii in units of @xmath227 , the radius within which the mean matter density is @xmath228 , and temperature in units of @xmath229 , the mean mass - weighted temperature of intracluster gas within @xmath227 . for clusters of this concentration , @xmath230 . note that setting @xmath231 produces a cluster model with a temperature gradient remaining within 10% of isothermal from small radii to beyond @xmath131 . projected cluster temperatures at large radii gradually decline with radius in all of our modified - entropy models . _ asca _ observations of many clusters show evidence for such a decline , which is often expressed as an effective polytropic index @xmath232 ( e.g. , markevitch 1998 ; markevitch 1999 ; ettori & fabian 1999 ) . these observations indicate that @xmath233 outside the cores of clusters . however , recent _ xmm - newton _ observations have shown that at least some clusters are nearly isothermal within @xmath234 , except for the low - temperature core ( arnaud 2001a , b ) . the results of [ sec - tinner ] suggest that radiative losses may be responsible for the isothermal profiles found in these clusters . figure [ gamma_profs ] shows how @xmath235 varies with radius in truncated modified - entropy models and in radiative - loss model @xmath209 . the cores of the truncated models are nearly isentropic , with @xmath236 at @xmath237 . this isentropic region extends to larger radii in cooler halos because their entropy thresholds amount to a larger fraction of the halo s mean entropy . outside the isentropic region , we find @xmath238 , in agreement with observations . the origin of this value of @xmath235 can be traced back to our assumption that the unmodified gas and dark - matter density profiles are described by identical nfw laws . komatsu & seljak ( 2001 ) have exploited that same assumption to construct polytropic models for the intracluster medium , finding that @xmath239 produces the best agreement between these density profiles at large radii . the behavior of @xmath235 in the radiative - loss models is similar to the truncated models at large radii but quite different at small radii . figure [ gamma_profs ] shows that the effective polytropic index steadily rises from @xmath240 inside the core through @xmath241 near the core radius to @xmath239 at larger radii . the point at which a cluster makes this transition from an isothermal gradient to a mildly declining gradient depends somewhat on cluster temperature . hot clusters with massive halos tend to have smaller concentrations which allow for near - isothermality at larger radii . in order to compare our models with observations , we have evaluated @xmath235 at @xmath242 , essentially twice the core radius . this radius is large enough to escape the severe model - dependence of @xmath235 within the cluster core but small enough that the signal - to - noise in cluster observations still allows for accurate measurements . figure [ gammas ] compares those evaluations of @xmath235 with the data of finoguenov ( 2001 ) . our models agree with the data , within the large observational uncertainties , and also share the observed ( 2.5@xmath243 ) tendency for @xmath235 to decline with increasing temperature . two different effects combine to produce higher values of @xmath235 at low temperature . because the halos of groups tend to be more concentrated than those of clusters , the scaled temperature @xmath244 tends to be larger in the cores of groups , leading to higher @xmath235 . an additional enhancement of @xmath235 appears in truncated models , in which the entropy threshold has a more significant effect at @xmath245 on group scales ( see figure [ gamma_profs ] ) . many efforts to measure cosmological parameters such as @xmath186 and @xmath188 have relied heavily on the cluster mass - temperature relation to link cluster masses to observables like cluster temperature and luminosity ( e.g. , henry 1997 ; bahcall & fan 1998 ; eke 1998 ; donahue & voit 1999 ; borgani 1999 ; henry 2000 ) . until very recently , observers had to rely on @xmath246-@xmath7 relations that were calibrated with numerical simulations ( e.g. , evrard 1996 ; bryan & norman 1998 ) . these simulations provide the constant of proportionality @xmath137 in the scaling relation @xmath247 values of @xmath137 from simulations in the literature can differ by as much as 30% ; examples include @xmath248 from evrard ( 1996 ) , @xmath249 from bryan & norman ( 1998 ) , @xmath248 from thomas ( 2001 ) , and @xmath250 from the non - radiative simulations of muanwong ( 2001 ) . the vast majority of these simulations ignore radiative cooling and supernova heating , both of which can elevate @xmath137 . mass - temperature relations derived from spatially - resolved x - ray observations now suggest that the normalization constant @xmath137 derived from simulations is indeed too low ( horner 1999 ; nevalainen 2000 ; finoguenov 2001 ) . furthermore , cluster - formation simulations that include radiative cooling also yield a higher normalization constant ; for example , @xmath251 in the radiative simulations of muanwong ( 2001 ) . our modified - entropy models support these findings . figure [ mtrel ] compares two @xmath252-@xmath81 relations derived from our modified - entropy models with the data from finogeunov ( 2001 ) and nevalainen ( 2000 ) . in these relations , we scale to @xmath252 , the halo mass inside the radius @xmath253 within which the mean matter density is @xmath254 , because measurements of @xmath252 are thought to be more reliable than measurements of @xmath184 . the data have been corrected for any cooling flow that might be present in the cluster core , so we compare them to our truncated models with concentration laws @xmath197 and @xmath198 . the corresponding @xmath252-@xmath81 relations generated from shifted models are virtually identical . both the truncated and shifted models agree well with the data , but those based on concentration relation @xmath198 appear to match the data slightly better . this agreement between the observed @xmath252-@xmath81 relation and the modified - entropy models is quite compelling , considering that the models contain no adjustable parameters . for comparision , figure [ mtrel ] also shows the relation derived from simulations by evrard ( 1996 ) , which has a lower temperature normalization ( equivalent to a higher mass normalization ) and a shallower slope . the steeper slope of the @xmath252-@xmath7 relation from modified - entropy models arises primarily from the dependence of @xmath137 on halo concentration . the higher concentration of low - mass halos leads to a higher luminosity - weighted temperature for a given mass . komatsu & seljak ( 2001 ) find a similar effect in their polytropic cluster models . entropy modification produces some additional steeping in the relation and shifts its normalization to higher temperatures ( see figure [ tlums_ts ] ) . the greater dispersion and offset toward lower masses at @xmath255 seen in figure [ mtrel ] could be due to surface - brightness bias ( lloyd - davies , bower , & ponman 2002 ) . because the gas temperature of intracluster gas in our models tends to decline with radius at large radii , the luminosity - weighted temperature depends on the maximum radius over which that temperature is measured . this effect is negligible in clusters because the bulk of the emission is concentrated around the cluster s core , but it can be significant in groups . figure [ mtrel_t_sb ] shows how the observed @xmath252-@xmath81 relation would depend on the limiting surface - brightness for truncated models with @xmath198 concentrations . increasing the surface brightness threshold changes the derived relation in the sense that is observed . figure [ mtrel_sb5e15 ] shows the relations for different entropy modification schemes at a fixed surface - brightness threshold of @xmath256 . truncated and shifted models are affected similarly , but surface - brightness bias has less effect on the radiative - loss model ( @xmath123 ) because its central temperature gradient is closer to isothermal . some of the scatter to higher temperatures may also arise from the scatter in concentrations expected in low - mass halos ( e.g. , afshordi & cen 2002 ) , but the analysis of lloyd - davies ( 2002 ) suggests that halo concentration alone can not account for the large dispersion of the mass - temperature relation for groups . despite the excellent agreement between our models and the observations , a word of caution is in order . both the modified - entropy models and the x - ray mass derivations assume that clusters are in hydrostatic equilibrium . simulations , on the other hand , suggest the intracluster velocity field is not completely relaxed , with turbulent velocities @xmath257% of the sound speed ( ricker & sarazin 2001 ) . furthermore , the luminosity - weighted temperature derived from theoretical modeling is not necessarily identical to the spectral - fit temperature derived from observations ( mathiesen & evrard 2001 ) . nevertheless , our results strongly imply that entropy modification and the cosmology - dependent relationship between halo mass and concentration must be accounted for in simulations designed to normalize the cluster mass - temperature relation . our previous work on modified - entropy models and the cooling threshold demonstrated how well these models account for the observed slope and normalization of the cluster luminosity - temperature relation ( voit & bryan 2001 ) . that paper compared truncated and shifted modified - entropy models to cluster data that were corrected for the effects of cooling flows . here , we revisit those models and show how the @xmath8-@xmath81 relation changes when gas below the cooling threshold is included . figure [ ltrel ] shows the @xmath8-@xmath81 relation for clusters without cooling flows . of the three models shown , the truncated model with concentration relation @xmath198 best fits the data , but all three models faithfully describe the @xmath8-@xmath81 relation equally well on cluster scales . substituting concentration relation @xmath197 shifts the models to slightly lower temperatures , but the agreement with groups is almost as good . using shifted instead of truncated entropy distributions elevates the x - ray luminosity on group scales by a factor @xmath258 . while there are essentially no free parameters in these models , the cluster luminosity does depend on our assumed value of @xmath186 . raising @xmath186 would lower the global ratio of baryons to dark matter , thereby lowering the luminosities of clusters in our models @xmath259 ( see eq . [ eq - lx ] ) . conversely , lowering @xmath186 would raise the cluster luminosities . the excellent agreement found here for @xmath260 should therefore reinforce confidence in similar measurements of the matter density from the baryon - to - dark - matter ratios of clusters ( e.g. , evrard 1997 ) . our models imply that groups are less suitable for such measurements because their baryon - to - dark - matter ratio within @xmath23 may be @xmath261% of the global value ( see figure [ rmax ] ) . the tendency of the data at @xmath262 to scatter toward the low-@xmath8 , high-@xmath81 side of the model relations may be due to the same effects that cause similar scatter at those temperatures in the observed @xmath252-@xmath263 relation . figure [ ltrel_t_sb ] shows how surface - brightness bias affects the luminosity - temperature relations derived from our models . raising the surface - brightness threshold within which luminosity and temperature are measured lowers @xmath8 while raising @xmath81 , producing the same trend seen in the data . measuring both of these quantities only within regions where @xmath264 produces relations that track the lower envelope of the group data . unlike the cluster measurements , the data on groups have not been corrected for the effects of gas below the cooling threshold , which could counterbalance the surface - brightness bias by raising @xmath8 and lowering @xmath81 ( see figure [ ltrel_sb5e15 ] ) . we therefore suspect that the dispersion in the @xmath6-@xmath7 data of helsdon & ponman ( 2000 ) arises from a combination of differing surface - brightness biases and differing amounts of gas below the cooling threshold . reproducing the behavior of clusters and groups with significant amounts of gas below the cooling threshold requires an additional parameter . in our models , that parameter is @xmath120 , which characterizes the slope of the entropy distribution function below the cooling threshold . figure [ lt_mark ] shows the relationship between @xmath81 and @xmath265 , the rosat - band ( 0.1 - 2.4 kev ) luminosity , in the data from markevitch ( 1998 ) and in models with differing values of @xmath120 . triangles show data corrected to remove the effects of gas below the cooling threshold , and the squares connected to those triangles show the uncorrected data . while the corrected data cluster around the line representing truncated models , many of the uncorrected data points lie closer to the line representing radiative - loss models with @xmath122 . a few uncorrected data points stray even farther from the truncated models , toward models with @xmath266 . notice that the lines connecting data points with the largest corrections are generally parallel to the lines connecting modified - entropy models with identical halo mass . this agreement suggests that the parameter @xmath120 adequately characterizes the offset in @xmath8-@xmath81 space owing to intracluster gas below the cooling threshold . an interesting test of these radiative - loss models would be to compare the value of @xmath120 inferred from the luminosity - temperature offset to that implied by the inner temperature gradient . the modified - entropy models we have constructed suggest that most of the observable properties of clusters depend on only two parameters . the halo mass @xmath184 determines a sort of cluster `` main sequence '' with well - defined @xmath252-@xmath81 and @xmath8-@xmath81 relations . deviations from those relations and the severity of the inner temperature gradient both depend on a second parameter , @xmath120 , related to the amount of intracluster gas below the cooling threshold , but what physical processes determine the value of @xmath120 ? one is tempted to interpret @xmath120 in terms of a mass cooling rate @xmath267 ; however , _ xmm - newton _ observations show little evidence for the low - temperature line emission expected in the standard cooling - flow picture ( peterson 2001 ) . thus , instead of viewing @xmath120 as simply a measure of cooling - flow strength , we would like to suggest a wider range of possibilities : * entropy history . our simplistic schemes for entropy modification treat clusters as if they were assembled very early in time , with some standard initial entropy distribution . in fact , the entropy history of the intracluster medium is likely to be far more complex , influenced in differing ways at various times by merger shocks , radiative cooling , and feedback . the dispersion seen in @xmath120 could stem from differences in the entropy history of clusters , with some evolutionary paths leading to abundant gas below the cooling threshold and other paths leading to very little . if this is the case , then a cluster s value of @xmath120 would be an important window into its past . * incomplete relaxation . _ chandra _ observations of several clusters have revealed `` cold fronts '' thought to be evidence of low - entropy gas sloshing around in the cores of those clusters ( markevitch 2000 ; vikhlinin , markevitch , & murray 2001 ) . our models assume that the lowest - entropy gas in a cluster has already settled into hydrostatic equilibrium at the cluster s center . some of the apparent dispersion in @xmath120 could be due to differences in the degree to which low - entropy gas has settled within cluster cores following the last major merger . * recent feedback . cooling and condensation of low - entropy gas at the center of a cluster is likely to lead to star formation and perhaps enhanced activity in the nucleus of the central galaxy ( fabian 1994 ) . both star formation and radio jets can provide feedback , imparting entropy to the cluster core that inhibits further condensation ( bhringer 2002 ) . perhaps these feedback processes control the value of @xmath120 . * thermal conduction . the presence of significant temperature gradients within the cores of some clusters has often been cited as evidence that magnetic fields strongly suppress electron thermal conduction in clusters ( fabian 1994 ) . recent _ chandra _ observations of some particularly sharp cold fronts have reinforced that supposition ( ettori & fabian 2000 ) . however , these observations constrain conduction in only one dimension and do not necessarily rule out conduction in the other two dimensions . furthermore , recent theoretical work suggests that magnetic fields might not suppress conduction as effectively as previously believed ( malyshkin & kulsrud 2001 ; malyshkin 2001 ; narayan & medvedev 2001 ) . it is possible that the magnetic field geometry in a cluster s core places a lower limit on the value of @xmath120 . investigating all of these possibilities is beyond the scope of this paper , but in the next section we explore how one might self - consistently calculate the intracluster entropy distribution within a hierarchical merging scenario . we have shown that some very simple prescriptions for the entropy distribution in present - day clusters lead to a remarkably realistic set of cluster models . however , the astrophysics that leads to these entropy distributions is certainly more complicated than we have assumed . understanding how the the physics of structure formation , cooling , and feedback determine the intracluster entropy distribution will require a more complete theory based on hierarchical merging . this section outlines a few of the basic issues involved in constructing such a theory . considering the entropy history of a single gas parcel affords some insight into how radiative cooling establishes an entropy threshold ( voit & bryan 2001 ) . suppose that the parcel begins with entropy @xmath268 in a halo of temperature @xmath269 at some early time @xmath270 . in a hierarchical merging scenario , the parcel s halo will eventually merge with another halo at time @xmath271 . merger shocks will then raise the parcel s entropy to some new value @xmath272 , and as that parcel settles within the new halo , it will approach a new temperature @xmath273 , similar to the characteristic temperature of that new halo . each subsequent merger will also raise the parcel s temperature and entropy . thus , the trajectory of a parcel through the entropy - temperature plane can be schematically represented by a sequence of points like that in figure [ entprop ] . the dashed lines in figure [ entprop ] show how the entropy threshold associated with cooling rises with time until it achieves its present value , indicated by the solid line . as long as a parcel s trajectory through the entropy - temperature plane remains above the cooling threshold , then radiative cooling and subsequent feedback will not significantly affect that parcel s entropy . however , any parcel that spends a large fraction of time below that threshold will be subject to substantial entropy loss , condensation , and whatever feedback ensues . feedback can continue as long as there are gas parcels below the cooling threshold , but once cooling and feedback have eliminated all gas below the cooling threshold , feedback must cease . thus , the threshold for entropy modification established by both cooling and feedback corresponds to the cooling threshold defined by the hubble time @xmath274 . although cooling sets the threshold for entropy modification , the model we are describing is not a cooling - flow model . hierarchical structure formation will ensure that mergers disperse the products of condensation throughout the final cluster . stars and galaxies form out of the lowest - entropy gas long before the cluster itself forms . hence , much of the low - entropy gas that would eventually find its way into the cluster core in a simulation with no radiative cooling decouples from the intracluster medium before it can participate in a centrally - focused cooling flow . finally , for reasons we will describe next , a certain amount of feedback is needed to prevent the incipient intracluster medium from overcooling at high redshift . overcooling is one of the classic problems that models of hierarchical structure formation must overcome ( cole 1991 ; white & frenk 1991 ; blanchard , valls - gabaud , & mamon 1992 ; balogh 2001 ) . if radiative cooling were allowed to proceed unchecked as structure formed , then a substantial percentage ( @xmath275% ) of the universe s baryons would have been locked into condensed objects before the era of cluster formation . because the fraction of uncondensed baryons in present - day clusters is @xmath276% , feedback processes like supernova heating are presumed to inhibit cooling and condensation of high - redshift baryons ( white & rees 1978 ; cole 1991 ; white & frenk 1991 ) . in our models , overcooling manifests itself as an entropy threshold @xmath82 that is much higher than the characteristic entropy of an unmodified high - redshift halo . to illustrate this effect , let us assume that the progenitor halo of a present - day cluster has a temperature @xmath277 that depends on redshift . the entropy threshold for that halo is then @xmath278 \ , t_h(z ) \}^{2/3}$ ] , and the characteristic entropy within @xmath23 in the unmodified halo is @xmath279 . the ratio of these two quantities in the high - redshift limit is thus @xmath280 } { t(z ) } \right\}^{2/3 } [ h(z ) t_h(z)]^{2/3 } h^{2/3}(z ) \ ; \ ; .\ ] ] because @xmath281 rises and @xmath277 declines with increasing redshift , this ratio must exceed unity at early times . we can use extended press - schechter theory ( bond 1991 ; bower 1991 ) to approximate @xmath277 and estimate the temperature , entropy , and redshift scales at which overcooling is problematic . first , to demonstrate the principle with simple scaling relations , we consider a scdm ( @xmath282 ) universe with a power spectrum given by an @xmath283 power law . in that case , the characteristic mass scale evolves like @xmath284 , and assuming that @xmath285 yields @xmath286 . at low redshifts , where @xmath7 is high , we have @xmath287 and @xmath288 . however , at high redshifts , when the progenitor temperature is smaller , we have @xmath169 and @xmath289 . thus , the progenitor of a halo with @xmath290 at @xmath291 would have @xmath292 at @xmath293 . figure [ ent_evol ] illustrates this effect more precisely for a @xmath171cdm universe seeded by a power spectrum with shape parameter @xmath294 . the dashed line shows @xmath295 for a halo that reaches @xmath296 at @xmath9 . the solid line shows the entropy threshold @xmath82 in that evolving halo for a metallicity of one - third solar . feedback must impart an entropy @xmath297 to prevent overcooling at @xmath298 . feedback can solve the overcooling problem , but it introduces another , more subtle problem into our framework . our modified - entropy models assume that gas above the cooling threshold follows the unmodified distribution @xmath78 . however , the need for feedback at early times implies that a large proportion of intracluster gas has experienced entropy modification at least once in its history . somehow , the process of cluster formation needs to restore the unmodified distribution to gas above the threshold at @xmath9 . exactly how that happens is unclear . consider what happens in a merger between two halos containing isothermal gas at temperatures @xmath269 and @xmath273 that collide at velocity @xmath299 . merger shocks with mach number @xmath300 will propagate through each halo s gas , raising the entropy of that gas by some more - or - less uniform factor depending on @xmath301 . this mechanism could potentially amplify the effects of early feedback , which must raise the intrahalo entropy to at least @xmath82 to avoid overcooling . subsequent shocks would then boost the entropy even further , along a path parallel to the dashed line in figure [ ent_evol ] . if this mechanism dominates , then very little gas should remain near @xmath82 at @xmath302 . however , early feedback is likely to diminish the effects of mergers , particularly in gas with low entropy . if feedback raises all the gas in the progenitor halo of a cluster to @xmath303 , then the intrahalo medium will be nearly isentropic , with high - temperature gas at the center of the halo and lower - temperature gas at the outskirts ( see figure [ tprofs ] ) . when mergers occur , mach numbers associated with lower - entropy gas in the halo s core will therefore be lower than those associated with higher - entropy gas near the virial radius . hence , merger shocks will act to steepen any entropy gradient that exists . dynamical friction may also add to this effect , because the cores of merging halos tend to lose orbital energy before they collide and merge . another effect to consider is the quasi - continuous accretion of gas associated with small halos , for which the mach number is likely to be quite high . this type of accretion will enhance the amount of high - entropy gas in the final cluster . thus , it seems possible that the modified - entropy models we have developed can successfully be linked with hierarchical structure formation , although many details remain to be worked out . several recent analyses of similarity breaking in groups and clusters have cast the problem in terms of energy rather than entropy ( e.g. , wu 1998 , 2000 ; lloyd - davies , ponman , & cannon 2000 ; loewenstein 2000 ; bower 2001 ; lloyd - davies 2002 ) . for example , if one knows what the configuration of the intracluster gas would be in the absence of non - gravitational heating and cooling processes , then one can opt to define the `` excess energy '' of a cluster s gas to be the difference in total energy between that unmodified configuration and the actual configuration . depending on what is assumed about the unmodified configuration , these excess energies can range from @xmath304 for groups ( e.g. , lloyd - davies 2000 , 2002 ) to over 2 kev for clusters ( e.g. , wu 2000 ) . the results of this paper indicate that some combination of heating and cooling is responsible for similarity breaking because cooling is needed to explain the core entropies of clusters and groups and heating is needed to prevent overcooling at early times . therefore , we prefer to compute excess energy in a way that explicitly accounts for the separate contributions of cooling and heating . first , we assume that the baseline state of a cluster of mass @xmath184 is a truncated model from which cooling and condensation has removed a fraction @xmath305 of the lowest - entropy gas . in other words , the initial configuration of the intracluster medium has an entropy floor equal to @xmath306 and contains a fraction @xmath307 of the cluster s baryons . then , we assume that the final state of the cluster is a shifted model with the same proportion of baryons but an entropy floor equal to the cooling threshold , so that it obeys the observed @xmath246-@xmath7 and @xmath6-@xmath7 relations . formally , the entropy distribution of the final state is @xmath308 with an outer boundary where @xmath309 . because the amount of hot baryonic gas in both models is the same , the amount of heat input required to explain the cluster scaling relations after a fraction @xmath305 of the intracluster gas has condensed equals the energy input needed to convert the initial configuration to the final configuration , including work done at the outer boundary of the intracluster medium . figure [ xs_energy ] shows the energy difference between these configurations as a function of halo mass for different values of the condensed baryon fraction @xmath305 . to facilitate comparisons with other treatments of excess energy , we divide this energy difference by the total number of particles in an unmodified cluster ( @xmath310 ) , giving the quantity @xmath311 in units of kev per particle . when the condensed baryon fraction is small ( @xmath312 ) , the excess energy needed to account for the scaling relations of massive clusters ( @xmath196 ) approaches the @xmath313 level . however , this large amount of excess energy depends heavily on the assumed form of the unmodified entropy distribution , which is likely to be a poor approximation for these purposes . the large difference in the excess energy of massive clusters between models with @xmath312 and @xmath314 indicates that a large amount of energy is needed to lift the lowest - entropy gas out of the very center of the gravitational potential . yet , figure [ denprofs ] shows that the unmodified intracluster density distribution is unlikely to be as centrally condensed as we have assumed . even in the absence of cooling , the true unmodified profile probably corresponds more closely to a truncated model with @xmath315 , which substantially reduces the excess energy burden . thus , when calculating excess energies for clusters , one must make sure that the baseline model accurately represents the cluster configuration in the absence of heating . the curve with @xmath316 is likely to be a more realistic representation of the heat input needed to explain the scaling properties of massive clusters for two reasons : ( 1 ) this value of @xmath305 roughly corresponds to the fraction of cluster baryons that have condensed into stars , and ( 2 ) when @xmath317 , truncation eliminates the innermost part of the entropy distribution that is discrepant with simulations . at @xmath318 , this excess energy curve suggests that only a fraction of a kev per particle is needed to explain cluster scaling relations . that is because a shifted model with an entropy shift determined by the cooling threshold is virtually identical to a truncated model with the innermost @xmath305 of gas removed . likewise , the mass scales at which curves with larger values of @xmath305 intercept the zero - energy level also indicate cases in which the truncated and shifted models are virtually identical , requiring no excess heating to produce the observed scaling relations . in the limiting case of zero supernova heating ( e.g. , bryan 2000 , muanwong 2001 ) , these intercept points show the fraction of condensed baryons implied by the @xmath6-@xmath7 relation as a function of halo mass . if the condensed baryon fractions of groups are similar to those of clusters , then @xmath319 of excess energy is needed to explain the @xmath246-@xmath7 and @xmath6-@xmath7 relations at @xmath262 . the main difference between the initial configuration and the final configuration of groups with @xmath320 is that the gas in the final configuration is considerably more extended , with substantially more gravitational potential energy . because models with higher @xmath305 contain less intragroup gas , they are less extended , and less energy is needed to change their configuration . we note that the excess energy needs of groups are comparable to estimates of the supernova energy released over the course of the group s history ( e.g. , ponman 1999 , loewenstein 2000 ; pipino 2002 ) , which may mean that no other source of energy is needed to explain their scaling properties , if that energy efficiently heats the intragroup medium . the bottom line here is that calculations of the heat input needed to account for the scaling relations of clusters and groups depend critically on what is assumed to happen in the absence of heat input . most calculations of excess energy have assumed that the intracluster gas density obeys either a simple polytropic equation of state ( e.g. , wu 2000 ; loewenstein 2000 ) or a @xmath125-model density profile ( e.g. , bower 2001 ; lloyd - davies 2002 ) whose parameters are adjusted according to the amount of heat input . the modified - entropy models discussed in this paper allow for cooling and condensation of the lowest - entropy gas to occur before heat is added . figure [ xs_energy ] demonstrates that the amount of heating needed to explain the scaling relations depends strongly on the amount of cooling that occurs prior to heat input and that realistic amounts of `` precooling '' substantially reduce the required amount of non - gravitational heating . a realistic family of models for clusters in hydrostatic and convective equilibrium can be constructed using the navarro , frenk , & white ( 1997 ) density profile and some rudimentary prescriptions for how radiative cooling and feedback induced by that cooling modify the entropy distribution of intracluster gas . the models presume that the intracluster entropy distribution in the absence of cooling and feedback would be identical to that of gas that takes on the same density distribution as the dark matter as it settles into the cluster s potential well an assumption supported by numerical simulations . because the lowest - entropy gas within that distribution can cool within a hubble time , its entropy must somehow be modified . the threshold entropy in our prescriptions for entropy modification corresponds to the entropy at which the cooling time of intracluster gas equals the age of the universe . the prescriptions themselves include truncation of the entropy distribution at the threshold entropy , shifting of the entropy distribution by adding the threshold entropy to the entire distribution , and a qualitative implementation of radiative cooling . exploring the properties of dimensionless models depending only on the halo concentration @xmath42 , the dimensionless entropy threshold @xmath84 , and the prescription for entropy modification reveals that : * removal of low - entropy gas acts to flatten the core density profile , regardless of whether cooling or heating eliminates that low - entropy gas ( see figures [ denprofs ] and [ denprofs_all ] ) . * the observable properties of clusters depend more critically on the threshold entropy than on the mode of entropy modification . for example , truncation of the intracluster entropy distribution at a given value of @xmath84 and shifting of the entropy distribution by that same amount lead to very similar pressure , density , and temperature profiles within the cluster s virial radius ( see figures [ denprofs_all ] and [ tprofs ] ) . * within about 30% of the virial radius , the surface - brightness profiles of truncated and shifted models are very similar to @xmath125-models ( see figure [ sbright ] ) . raising the entropy threshold tends to lower the best - fitting value of @xmath125 , while raising the halo concentration tends to decrease the core radius ( see figures [ betafits_t ] and [ betafits_s ] ) . * all of our prescriptions for entropy modification tend to augment the luminosity - weighted temperature of a cluster as the entropy threshold rises . however , that temperature increase is relatively small because the increased central entropy decreases the luminosity of high - temperature gas in the core . thus , modifiying the entropy of a cluster shifts the bulk of a cluster s luminosity to larger radii , where gas temperatures tend to be smaller , mitigating the effects of the entropy increase ( see [ emodtemp ] ) . * all of our prescriptions for entropy modification reduce the x - ray luminosity of a cluster as the entropy threshold rises . in the high - threshold limit , dimensionless luminosity scales as @xmath149 , owing to the asymptotic @xmath321 scaling of the unmodified nfw density distribution at large radius ( see [ emodlum ] ) . when luminosity scales with the entropy threshold in this way , the @xmath6-@xmath7 relation should not flatten below @xmath322 , where line cooling dominates free - free emission , and the relation should also evolve little with time . the observed @xmath6-@xmath7 relation shares both of these features . furthermore , this scaling of luminosity with the entropy threshold leads to an @xmath6-@xmath7 relation slightly steeper than @xmath323 , with the extra steepening coming from the tendency for low - temperature halos to be more concentrated , also in agreement with observations . adopting relations between halo concentration @xmath42 and halo mass @xmath184 that are drawn from simulations and supported by observations enables us to generate models for real clusters that reproduce many of their observable properties : * fitting @xmath125-models to our modified - entropy clusters yields @xmath125 and core - radius values that are similar to those of observed clusters . our models reproduce the observed tendency for @xmath125 to be lower in low - temperature halos , a behavior that arises because the entropy threshold determined by cooling has a much larger impact on low - temperature halos . our models also reproduce the observed relationship between core radius and temperature , implying that @xmath324 , regardless of temperature . despite the flattening of the density profile in low - temperature halos , the core radius remains near @xmath325 because of the increased halo concentration ( see figures [ betafits_t ] and [ betafits_s ] ) . the large dispersion observed in @xmath125 and @xmath130 could arise from a number of effects , some involving observational systematics such as surface - brightness bias and the range of radii in the fit , others involving physical differences such as cluster - to - cluster variations in the amount of gas below the cooling threshold ( see figures [ bmods ] and [ bmods_all ] ) . * the temperature gradient at small radii in our model clusters depends sensitively on the amount of gas below the cooling threshold , closely related to the parameter @xmath120 in our radiative - loss models . in our most extreme radiative - loss model , with @xmath226 , the temperature gradient at @xmath326 is very similar to the `` universal '' temperature gradient observed by allen ( 2001 ) . as the parameter @xmath120 rises to infinity , the limit in which no gas lies below the cooling threshold , the inner temperature gradient flattens and then reverses , monotonically decreasing with radius in the large @xmath120 limit ( see figure [ tinner ] ) . * all of our models have a negative temperature gradient at large radii because the underlying potential is steeper than isothermal at those radii . in order to compare our models with observations , we compute the effective polytropic index @xmath327 as a function of radius . at the virial radius , we find @xmath328 , but the behavior of @xmath235 at smaller radii depends strongly on the nature of entropy modification . in models with no gas below the cooling threshold , the cluster core is nearly isentropic , with @xmath329 . in models with significant amounts of gas below that threshold , we find @xmath330 within the core radius , a consequence of the positive temperature gradient ( see figure [ gamma_profs ] ) . values of @xmath235 evaluated at @xmath245 agree with observations , within the large observational uncertainties ( see figure [ gammas ] ) . * the mass - temperature relations derived from our truncated and shifted modified - entropy models , which have no gas below the cooling threshold , agree well with those derived from cluster observations that have been corrected for the presence of cooling flows ( see figure [ mtrel ] ) . the slope of this relation is steeper than the @xmath331 expectation from self - similar scaling because low - temperature halos are more concentrated , leading to a slightly higher temperature for a given mass ( see figure [ tlums_ts ] ) , a feature these models share with those of komatsu & seljak ( 2001 ) . clusters of a given temperature are less massive than those in simulations without cooling and feedback because entropy modification owing to these processes shifts all of our model clusters to higher temperature . however , the agreement between observations and our models does not necessarily imply that this @xmath246-@xmath7 relation is without problems , as both the observational determinations and the models assume that the intracluster medium is an ideal gas in hydrostatic equilibrium , which may not be the case . furthermore , this relation does not apply to clusters that have not been corrected for cooling flows the temperature normalization at a given mass in our radiative - loss models can be up to 30% lower , depending on the value of @xmath120 ( see figures [ tlums_r ] and [ tlums_ta ] ) . * the luminosity - temperature relations derived from truncated and shifted models also agree well with those derived from cooling - flow corrected observations of clusters ( see figure [ ltrel ] ) . while there are no adjustable parameters in these models , the baryon - to - dark - matter ratio does depend on our assumed value of @xmath260 . thus , this agreement can be taken as additional evidence for a low value of @xmath186 . * gas below the cooling threshold both raises the x - ray luminosity and lowers the luminosity - weighted temperature of our model clusters . hence , the @xmath6-@xmath7 relations derived from our radiative - loss models lie above and to the left of the truncated and shifted models in the @xmath6-@xmath7 plane . changing @xmath120 leads to a displacement almost perpendicular to the @xmath6-@xmath7 relations themselves ( see figure [ lt_mark ] ) . correcting for cooling - flow emission leads to a very similar displacement in @xmath6-@xmath7 space , suggesting that the @xmath6-@xmath7 relation for uncorrected clusters may depend almost entirely on the two parameters @xmath184 and @xmath120 . it will be interesting to see whether values of @xmath120 derived from displacement in @xmath6-@xmath7 space agree with those implied by the inner temperature gradient . the modified - entropy models we have derived can account for many of the observed properties of present - day clusters , but they are obviously too simplistic to tell us how those clusters got to be the way they are . somehow , hierarchical structure formation generated intracluster entropy distributions similar to our simple prescriptions for entropy modification . cooling , feedback , and merging all have important roles to play . the consistency of our models with the data strongly suggests that radiative cooling sets the level of the intracluster entropy threshold and substantially reduces the amount of heat input needed to explain the observed scaling relations . however , radiative cooling unchecked by feedback would lead to overcooling of intrahalo gas at @xmath332 ( see [ overcool ] ) . at least some feedback is needed to keep @xmath276% of intergalactic baryons in gaseous form , as observed . mergers following an episode of feedback can potentially amplify the entropy generated by that feedback , when low - density gas associated with low - temperature halos is shocked . however , the overall impact of mergers on intracluster entropy remains unclear . determining just how cooling , mergers , and feedback conspire to produce the present - day entropy distribution of clusters will require high - resolution numerical simulations and semi - analytical modeling focusing on the intergalactic entropy distribution and how it evolves . we acknowledge megan donahue and don horner for helpful conversations and trevor ponman and stefano borgani for comments on the original manuscript . mlb is supported by a pparc rolling grant for extragalactic astronomy and cosmology at the university of durham . Abstract:
[ "we present a set of cluster models that link the present - day properties of clusters to the processes that govern galaxy formation . these models treat the entropy distribution of the intracluster medium as its most fundamental property . because convection strives to establish an entropy gradient that rises with radius , the observable properties of a relaxed cluster depend entirely on its dark - matter potential and the entropy distribution of its uncondensed gas . guided by simulations , we compute the intracluster entropy distribution that arises in the absence of radiative cooling and supernova heating by assuming that the gas - density distribution would be identical to that of the dark matter . the lowest - entropy gas would then fall below a critical entropy threshold at which the cooling time equals a hubble time . radiative cooling and whatever feedback is associated with it must modify the entropy of that low - entropy gas , changing the overall entropy distribution function and thereby altering the observable properties of the cluster . using some phenomenological prescriptions for entropy modification based on the existence of this cooling threshold , we construct a remarkably realistic set of cluster models . the surface - brightness profiles , mass - temperature relation , and luminosity - temperature relation of observed clusters all naturally emerge from these models . by introducing a single adjustable parameter related to the amount of intracluster gas that can cool within a hubble time , we can also reproduce the observed temperature gradients of clusters and the deviations of cooling - flow clusters from the standard luminosity - temperature relation ." ]
16,192
16,192
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: unveiling the nature of the unidentified gamma - ray sources ( ugss ) ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) is one of the biggest challenges in contemporary gamma - ray astronomy . since the era of the compton gamma - ray observatory many @xmath1-ray objects have not been conclusively associated with counterparts at other frequencies @xcite , although various classes have been investigated to understand whether they are likely to be detected at @xmath1-ray energies or not ( e.g. , * ? ? ? according to the second _ fermi _ large area telescope ( lat ) catalog ( 2fgl ; * ? ? ? * ) , @xmath01/3 of the @xmath1-ray detected sources are still unassociated with their low energy counterparts . moreover a large fraction of the ugss are likely to be of blazars , the rarest class of radio loud active galactic nuclei , because their emission dominates the @xmath1-ray sky ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . however , due to the incompleteness of the current radio and x - ray surveys on the basis of the usual @xmath1-ray association method is not always possible to find the blazar - like counterpart of an ugs . additional attempts have also been recently developed to associate or to characterize the ugss using either pointed _ swift _ observations ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) or statistical approaches ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? blazar emission is characterized by high and variable polarization , apparent superluminal motions , and high luminosities , generally combined with a flat radio spectrum that steepens toward the infrared - optical bands and together with rapid flux variability from the radio to @xmath1-rays ( e.g. , * ? ? ? their spectral energy distributions show two main broad components : a low - energy one peaking in the range from the ir to the x - ray band , and a high - energy component peaking from mev to tev energies ( e.g. , * ? ? ? blazars are divided in two main classes : the low luminosity class constituted by the bl lac objects and characterized by featureless optical spectra , and the second class composed of flat - spectrum radio quasars that show optical emission lines , typical of quasar spectra @xcite . in the following we label the bl lac objects as bzbs and the flat - spectrum radio quasars as bzqs , following the nomenclature of the multifrequency catalogue of blazars ( roma - bzcat , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? on the basis of the preliminary data release of the wide - field infrared survey explorer ( _ wise _ , see * ? ? ? * for more details ) , we discovered that in the 3-dimensional ir color space @xmath1-ray emitting blazars lie in a distinct region , well separated from other extragalactic sources whose ir emission is dominated by thermal radiation ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? according to dabrusco et al . ( 2013 ) we refer to the 3-dimensional region occupied by @xmath1-ray emitting blazars as the @xmath2 , to its 2-dimensional projection in the [ 3.4]-[4.6]-[12 ] @xmath3 m color - color diagram as the _ wise _ gamma - ray strip . this _ wise _ analysis led to the development of a new association method to recognize @xmath1-ray blazar candidates for the unidentified @xmath1-ray sources listed in the 2fgl @xcite , as well as in the 4@xmath4 _ integral _ catalog @xcite . in the present paper we adopt several improvements recently made on the association procedure and we use a more conservative approach ( see * ? ? ? * for more details ) , mostly based on the _ wise _ full archive , available since march 2012 ( see also * ? ? ? we successfully tested the association procedure on all the blazars listed in the second _ fermi _ lat catalog of active galactic nuclei ( 2lac ; * ? ? ? * ) and in the 2fgl catalogs , to estimate its efficiency and its completeness . in this paper we apply this method to the ugss and to sample of the active galactic nuclei of uncertain type ( agus ) that have still unclear classification ( see 2fgl and also section [ sec : agu ] for specific definition of the class ) , both listed in the 2fgl . we also performed an extensive literature search looking for multifrequency information on the @xmath1-ray blazar candidates selected on the basis of their _ wise _ colors to confirm their nature . as we show below this research is crucial to determine whether or not there are classes of galactic and extragalactic sources that , having ir colors similar to those of blazars , could be a contaminants of the association method . the paper is organized as follows : in section [ sec : sample ] we describe the sample selected . in section [ sec : method ] we illustrate the basic details of the association procedure and highlight the improvements with respect to the previous version . in section [ sec : results ] we describe the results obtained . section [ sec : counterparts ] is dedicated to the correlating our results with several databases at radio , infrared , optical and x - ray frequencies to characterize the multifrequency behavior of the @xmath1-ray blazar candidates . we then compare our results on the associated sources with those based on statistical methods developed by ackermann et al . ( 2012 ) in section [ sec : comparison ] . finally , section [ sec : summary ] is devoted to our conclusions . the most frequent acronyms used in the paper are listed in table [ tab : acronym ] . multifrequency catalog of blazars & roma - bzcat + first _ fermi _ large area telescope catalog & 1fgl + second _ fermi _ large area telescope catalog & 2fgl + second _ fermi _ lat catalog of active galaxies & 2lac + bl lac object & bzb + flat spectrum radio quasar & bzq + blazar of uncertain type & bzu + unidentified gamma - ray source & ugs + active galactic nucleus of uncertain type & agus + + [ tab : acronym ] our primary sample of ugss consists of all the sources for which no counterpart was assigned at low energies in the 2fgl or in the 2lac ( * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * respectively ) , for a total of 590 @xmath1-ray objects . we considered and analyzed independently two subsamples of ugss , distinguishing the 299 _ fermi _ sources without any @xmath1-ray analysis flags from the other 291 objects that have a warning in their @xmath1-ray detection . this distinction has been performed because future releases of the _ fermi _ catalogs based on improvements of the _ fermi _ response matrices and revised analyses , could make their detection more reliable , as occurred for a handful of sources flagged in the first _ fermi _ lat catalog ( 1fgl , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? according to the definition of the 2lac and 2fgl catalogs , active galaxies of uncertain type ( agus ) are @xmath1-ray emitting sources with at least one of the following criteria : 1 . they do not have a good optical spectrum available or with an uncertain classification , as for example , sources classified as blazars of uncertain type ( bzu ) in the roma - bzcat ; 2 . they have been selected as candidate counterparts on the basis of the @xmath5 - @xmath6 and the likelihood ratio methods described in the 2lac and applied to several radio catalogs : including the at20 g @xcite , crates @xcite , or class @xcite ( see * ? ? ? * for details ) ; 3 . they are coincident with a radio and a x - ray source selected by the likelihood ratio method . the number of agus in the 2fgl , that have been analyzed is 210 ; excluding @xmath1-ray sources with analysis flags ( defined according to both the 2fgl or the 2lac descriptions ) . the complete description of our association procedure together with the estimates of its efficiency and its completeness can be found in dabrusco et al . ( 2013 ) where we discuss a new and improved version of the association method based on a 3-dimensional parametrization of the @xmath2 occupied by @xmath1-ray emitting blazars with _ wise _ counterparts . here we provide only an overview . we note that the results of the improved method are in agreement with those of the previous parametrization , thus superseding the previous procedure @xcite . the new association procedure was built to improve the efficiency of recognizing @xmath1-ray blazar candidates , to decrease the number of possible contaminants and , at the same time , to determine if a selected @xmath1-ray blazar counterpart is more likely to be a bzb or a bzq . the main differences between the two association methods reside in the parameter space where the @xmath2 has been defined ( ir color space for the old version and principal component space for the new one ) and in the assignment criteria of the classes for the @xmath1-ray blazar candidates ( see * ? ? ? the new method also takes into account of the correction for galactic extinction for all the _ wise _ magnitudes , [ 4.6 ] , [ 12 ] , [ 22 ] @xmath3 m nominal _ wise _ bands are in the vega system . ] according to the draine ( 2003 ) relation . as shown in dabrusco et al . ( 2013 ) , this correction affects only marginally the [ 3.4]-[4.6 ] color , in particular at low galactic latitudes ( i.e. , @xmath715 deg ) . the principal component analysis is designed to reduce the dimensionality of a dataset consisting of usually large number of correlated variables while retaining as much as possible of the variance present in the data in the smallest possible number of orthogonal parameters . this is achieved by transforming the observed parameter into a new set of variables , the principal components . they are ordered so that the first accounts the largest possible variance of the original dataset and the others in turn have the highest variance possible under the constraint of being orthogonal to the preceding ones ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? thus our new parametrization of the @xmath2 in the pc space , where the maximum variance is contained along only one axis , is simpler than any other possible representation in the ir color space . for each @xmath1-ray source we defined a _ search region _ : a circular region of radius @xmath8 equal to the semi - major axis of the ellipse corresponding to the positional uncertainty region of the _ fermi _ source at 95% level of confidence and centered at the 2fgl position of the @xmath1-ray source ( e.g. , * ? ? ? we selected and calculated the ir colors for the _ wise _ sources within the _ search region _ detected in all four bands . to compare the infrared colors of generic infrared sources that lie in the _ search region _ with those of the @xmath1-ray emitting ones , we developed a 3-dimensional parametrization of the @xmath2 in the parameter space of its principal components . the @xmath2 was described as a cylinder in the space of the principal components . this choice simplifies and improves the previous description built using irregular quadrilaterals on all the color - color diagrams @xcite . moreover , the cylinder axis is aligned along the first pc axis , which accounts for the larger fraction possible of the variance of the dataset in the ir color space , is the simplest parametrization available . we then assign to each source _ score _ value @xmath9 that is a proxy of the distance between the @xmath2 surface and the source location in the 3-dimensional parameter space of the principal components . the values of @xmath9 allow to to evaluate if the ir colors of a generic source are consistent with those of the known @xmath1-ray emitting blazars . they were weighted taking into account of all the color errors and they are also normalized between 0 and 1 . we define three classes ( i.e. , a , b , c ) of reliability for the @xmath1-ray blazar candidates . a generic source is assigned to class a , class b or class c when its @xmath10 his higher than the threshold values defined by the 90% , 60% and 30% percentiles of the @xmath10 distributions of all the @xmath1-ray blazars that constitute the @xmath2 , respectively . we consider reliable @xmath1-ray blazar candidates only those having the score higher than 70% of their distributions . thus sources with high values of the @xmath10 ( e.g. , @xmath110.8 ) are very likely to be blazars and belong to class a , while sources with @xmath10 values @xmath00.5 belong to class c and are less probable @xmath1-ray blazars . ir sources that having @xmath10 values null or extremely low ( e.g. , @xmath00.1 ) were marked as _ outliers _ and were not considered as @xmath1-ray blazar candidates ( see * ? ? ? * for an extensive explanation on the class definitions ) . the @xmath2 was divided in subregions on the basis of the space density of bzbs and bzqs in the parameter space of its principal components , thereby permitting us to determine if a selected @xmath1-ray blazar candidate is more likely to be a bzb or a bzq . finally , we ranked all the _ wise _ sources within each _ search region _ and selected as best candidate counterpart for the ugs the one with the highest class ; when more than one candidate of the same class was present , we chose the one closest to the @xmath1-ray position as best one . for the ugss without @xmath1-ray analysis flags we found 75 @xmath1-ray blazar candidates out of the 299 objects analyzed : 8 sources have 2 candidates , 1 source has 3 , and 1 source has 4 candidates , while 52 associations are unique . we found 2 @xmath1-ray blazar candidates of class a , 12 of class b and 61 of class c , respectively , in the whole sample of 75 sources ; 32 of them are classified as bzb type , 29 as bzq type and the remaining 14 are still uncertain ( see * ? ? ? * for more details ) . all our @xmath1-ray blazar candidates have a _ signal - to - noise ratio _ systematically larger than 10.9 in the _ wise _ band centered at 12@xmath3 m and larger than @xmath020 for the 3.4@xmath3 m and 4.6@xmath3 m nominal bands . for all these 75 sources we performed a cross correlation with the major radio , infrared , optical , and x - ray surveys ( see section [ sec : counterparts ] ) . in the sample of ugss with @xmath1-ray analysis flags we found 71 @xmath1-ray blazar candidates out of the 291 objects investigated : 6 sources have 2 candidates , 4 sources have 3 candidates , 2 sources have 4 and 6 candidates , respectively , while 35 associations are unique . we found 8 @xmath1-ray blazar candidates of class a , 20 of class b and 43 of class c , respectively , in the whole sample of 71 sources ; 36 of them are classified as bzb type , 22 as bzq type and the remaining 13 are still uncertain ( see * ? ? ? * ) . we also performed the cross correlation with the major radio , infrared , optical , and x - ray databes for these 71 ugss listed in the section [ sec : counterparts ] . for the agu sample we found 125 @xmath1-ray blazar candidates out of the 210 sources analyzed : 10 sources have 2 candidates within their _ search region _ , while the remaining 105 candidates have unique associations . there are 10 @xmath1-ray blazar candidates of class a , 39 of class b and 76 of class c , respectively , in the whole sample of 125 sources ; 52 out of 125 are classified as bzb type on the basis of the ir colors of blazars of similar type , 39 as bzq type and the remaining 34 are still uncertain ( see * ? ? ? * for more details ) . eighty - seven sources out of 125 associations correspond to those reported in the 2lac or in the 2fgl . all our @xmath1-ray blazar candidates have a _ signal - to - noise ratio _ systematically larger than 10.9 in the _ wise _ band centered at 12@xmath3 m and larger than @xmath020 for the 3.4@xmath3 m and 4.6@xmath3 m nominal bands . in these case we did not provide any additional radio or x - ray information since it is already present in both the 2lac and the 2fgl , while a multifrequency investigation has been performed for the remaining 38 . additional ir information for all the agus associated will be discussed in section [ sec : infrared ] . the fraction of sources for which we have been able to find a @xmath1-ray blazar counterpart is about @xmath015 - 20% lower than presented in previous analyses of ugss @xcite and agus @xcite , respectively . this difference occurs because a more conservative approach has been adopted in the new parametrization of the @xmath2 . we not limit blazar candidates to those having the _ scores _ higher than 30% of the entire distribution of @xmath1-ray emitting blazars @xcite , rather than 10% as in the previous analysis . these choices made our association method more efficient , so decreasing the number of _ wise _ sources with ir colors similar to those of the @xmath1-ray blazar population . in addition , we now use a _ search region _ of radius @xmath8 instead of that at 99.9% level of confidence , to be consistent with the associations of the 2fgl and the 2lac catalogs . all the sources listed in this work as @xmath1-ray blazar candidates were also selected in our previous analysis based on _ wise _ preliminary data analysis @xcite . we note that only three ir _ wise _ sources have the contamination and confusion " flag that might indicate a _ wise _ spurious detection of an artifact in all bands ( e.g. , * ? ? ? it occurs for _ wise _ j085238.73 - 575529.4 within the agus , _ wise _ j084121.63 - 355505.9 in the ugs sample , and wise j125357.07 - 583322.3 among the ugs with @xmath1-ray analysis flags . the large majority ( i.e. , @xmath090% ) of the _ wise _ sources considered do not show any _ wise _ analysis flags , with 10% clean in at least two ir bands . finally , we remark that several @xmath1-ray pulsars have been identified since the release of the 2fgl where they were listed as ugss however , we tested these ugss and we did not find any _ wise _ blazar - like counterpart associable to them . thus , in agreement with other gamma - ray pulsars listed in the the public list of lat - detected gamma - ray pulsars.[multiblock footnote omitted ] we searched in the following major radio , infrared , optical and x - ray surveys as well as in the nasa extragalactic database ( ned)[multiblock footnote omitted ] for possible counterparts within 3.3 of our @xmath1-ray blazar candidates , selected with the _ wise_association method , to see if additional information could confirm their blazar - like nature . the angular separation of 3.3 from the _ wise _ position was chosen on the basis of the statistical analysis previously performed to assign a _ wise _ counterpart to each roma - bzcat source @xcite developed following the approach described in maselli et al . ( 2012a , 2012b ) . in particular , we found that for all radii larger than 3.3 the increase in the number of ir sources positionally associated with roma - bzcat blazars becomes systematically lower than the increase in number of random associations . this choice of radius results in zero multiple matches . for the radio counterparts we used the nrao vla sky survey ( nvss ; * ? ? ? * - n ) , the vla faint images of the radio sky at twenty - centimeters ( first ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * - f ) , the sydney university molonglo sky survey ( sumss ; * ? ? ? * - s ) and the australia telescope 20 ghz survey ( at20 g ; * ? ? ? * - a ) ; for the infrared we used the two micron all sky survey ( 2mass ; * ? ? ? * - m ) since each _ wise _ source is already associated with the closest 2mass source by the default catalog ( see * ? ? ? * for more details ) . we also marked sources that are variable when having the _ variability flag _ higher than 5 in at least one band as in the _ wise _ all - sky catalog @xcite . then , we also searched for optical counterparts , with possible spectra available , in the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ; e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * - s ) , in the six - degree - field galaxy redshift survey ( 6dfgs ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * - 6 ) ; while for the high energy we looked in the soft x - rays using the rosat all - sky survey ( rass ; * ? ? * - x ) . a deeper x - ray analysis based on the pointed observations present in the _ xmm - newton _ , _ chandra _ , _ swift _ and _ suzaku _ archives will be performed in a forthcoming paper @xcite . we also considered ned for additional information . we also searched in the usno - b catalog @xcite for the optical counterparts of our @xmath1-ray blazar candidates within 3.3 ; this cross correlation will be useful to prepare future follow up observations and the complete list of sources together with their optical magnitudes is reported in appendix . in table [ tab : sum ] we summarize all the multifrequency information for the ugs samples , without and with the @xmath1-ray analysis flags , respectively , while all the details are given in in table [ tab : ugs ] and table [ tab : ugf ] . in table [ tab : agu1 ] and table [ tab : agu2 ] we report our findings the agus . in each table we report the 2fgl source name , together with that of the _ wise _ associated counterpart and a generic one from the surveys cited above . we also report the ir _ wise _ colors , the type and the class of each candidate derived by our association procedure , the notes regarding the multifrequency archival analysis , as the optical classification , and , if known , the redshift . in table [ tab : agu1 ] and table [ tab : agu2 ] , we also indicate if the selected source is the same associated by the 2fgl and the 2lac . figure [ fig : wise ] shows the 3-dimensional color plot comparing the ir colors of the selected @xmath1-ray blazar candidates with the blazar population that constitutes the @xmath2 . ( known @xmath1-ray blazars are indicated in yellow ) in comparison with the selected @xmath1-ray blazar candidates : ugss ( red ) and agus ( black).,width=332,height=340 ] & & ugs ( no @xmath1-flags ) & ugss ( @xmath1-flags ) + nvss & radio & 19/75 & 4/71 + first & radio & 6/75 & 1/71 + sumss & radio & 7/75 & 0/71 + 2mass & infrared & 43/75 & 47/71 + 6dfgs & optical & 1/75 & 1/71 + sdss & optical & 13/75 & 1/71 + rosat & x - ray & 3/75 & 1/71 + + [ tab : sum ] in the ugs sample of sources without @xmath1-ray analysis flags , 19 have a counterpart in the nvss ; 7 in the sumss and 6 only in the first ( 5 in common with the previous 19 in the nvss ) . in the list of ugss with @xmath1-ray analysis flags , we found only 4 sources having a radio counterpart in the nvss , one also detected in the first , but none in the sumss or in the at20 g catalogs . in figure [ fig : radio ] we show the archival nvss radio image of _ wise _ j134706.89 - 295842.3 , the candidate low - energy counterpart of 2fglj1347.0 - 2956 . within the agu sample , 12 sources out the 38 new associations proposed have unique counterparts in one of the considered radio survey . two of them : bzuj1239 + 0730 and bzuj1351 - 2912 , were also classified as blazars of uncertain type in the roma - bzcat ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , while the remaining one are divided as 6 in the nvss , 1 in the first , 2 in the sumss and 1 in the at20 g . in the ugs sample of sources without @xmath1-ray analysis flags , there are 43 _ wise _ candidates with counterparts in the 2mass catalog : 10 out of 75 are variable infrared sources according to the same criterion previously described . the large majority ( 47 out of 71 ) of the ugss , in the sample with @xmath1-ray analysis flags , have counterparts in the 2mass catalog and 15 out of 71 are variable according to the _ wise_all - sky catalog . of the 125 _ wise _ candidates counterparts of the agus , 59 are detected in 2mass , as generally expected for blazars ( e.g. , * ? ? ? in addition , 25 @xmath1-ray blazar candidates out of 125 have the variability flag in the _ wise _ catalog with a value higher than 5 in at least one band , suggesting that their ir emission is not likely arising from dust . in the sample of ugss without @xmath1-ray analysis flags , 13 sources have been found with a counterpart in the sdss , 4 with spectroscopic information ( table [ tab : ugs ] ) . among these 4 sources , two are broad line quasars , promising to be blazar - like sources of bzq type . one is a seyfert galaxy : sdss j015910.05 + 010514.5 is a contaminant of our association procedure ( although our method suggests a better candidate , for 2fglj0158.4 + 0107 ) . the remaining one , nvss j161543 + 471126 shows the optical spectrum similar to that of an x - ray bright , optically normal galaxy ( xbong * ? ? ? the source sdss j015836.23 + 010632.0 , another candidate counterpart of 2fglj0158.4 + 0107 is described as a quasar at redshift 0.723 in schneider et al . ( 2007 ) and hu et al . in addition to these 4 sources , spectroscopic information is also available for wise j230010.16 - 360159.9 a possible low - energy counterpart of 2fglj2300.0 - 3553 , classified as quasar according to jones et al . a quasar - like spectrum is then available for sdss j161434.67 + 470420.0 candidate counterpart of 2fglj1614.8 + 4703 . the search for the optical counterparts for ugss with @xmath1-ray analysis flags was less successful . only one source has an optical , counterpart : wise j131552.98 - 073301.9 , associated with 2fglj1315.6 - 0730 . this source has a counterpart in both the nvss and in the first radio survey . according to bauer et al . ( 2009 ) , this source is also variable in the optical and it was therefore selected as a blazar candidate . in figure [ fig : optical2 ] we show the archival sdss spectrum of the _ wise _ j161434.67 + 470420.1 candidate as the low energy counterpart of 2fglj1614.8 + 4703 . we found only 1 @xmath1-ray blazar candidate in the agu sample with a counterpart in the sdss , while 4 of them have a 6dfgs source lying 3.3 from their _ wise _ position . in the case of wise j033200.72 - 111456.1 associated with 2fglj0332.5 - 1118 , we also found that its 6dfgs optical spectrum appear to be featureless suggesting a bl lac classification @xcite . the same information has been found for wise j001920.58 - 815251.3 associated with 2fglj0018.8 - 8154 , for which the noisy , featureless 6dfgs optical spectrum points to a bl lac classification @xcite . 2fglj0823.0 + 4041 and 2fglj0858.1 - 1952 appear to be associated , both by the 2fgl catalog and our method to broad line quasars . wise j085805.36 - 195036.8 associated with 2fglj0858.1 - 1952 is also classified as a quasar at redshift 0.6597 by white et al . the archival 6dfgs spectrum of _ wise _ j001920.58 - 815251.3 the candidate low energy counterpart of 2fglj0018.8 - 8154 is available on ned ; the absence of features allows us to classify the source as a bzb . in the ugs sample without @xmath1-ray analysis flags , only 3 objects have x - ray counterparts in the rosat all - sky catalog : the seyfert 1 galaxy sdss j015910.05 + 010514.5 , the quasar sdss j161434.67 + 470420.0 ( both described in section [ sec : optical ] ) and wise j164619.95 + 435631.0 associated with 2fglj1647.0 + 4351 . in addition , sdss j161434.67 + 470420.0 is also detected in the _ chandra _ source catalog : cxo j161434.7 + 470419 as occurs nvss j161543 + 471126 , alias cxo j161541.2 + 471111 @xcite . in the ugs list of sources with @xmath1-ray analysis flags , there is only a single object detected in the rosat all - sky survey , namely wise j043947.48 + 260140.5 uniquely associated with the _ fermi _ source 2fglj0440.5 + 2554c and with a x - ray counterpart also in the _ chandra _ source catalog cxo j043947.5 + 260140 @xcite . in addition , wise j060659.94 - 061641.5 the unique counterpart of 2fglj0607.5 - 0618c , has the _ chandra _ counterpart cxo j060700.1 - 061641 @xcite . finally , in the agu sample of 38 new @xmath1-ray blazar candidates we found only 1 source in the rosat catalog , namely wise j181037.99 + 533501.5 , associated with the x - ray object 1rxs j181038.5 + 533458 and having a radio counterpart in the nvss . according to ned , wise j182352.33 + 431452.5 , associated with 2fglj1823.8 + 4312 , is also detected in the x - rays by _ chandra _ : cxo j182352.2 + 431452 @xcite . [ 12]-[22 ] & type & class & notes & z + name & name & name & mag & mag & mag & & & & + j0039.1 + 4331 & j003858.27 + 432947.0 & & 0.98(0.04 ) & 2.36(0.05 ) & 2.30(0.15 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j0116.6 - 6153 & j011619.59 - 615343.5 & sumss j011619 - 615343 & 0.85(0.04 ) & 2.34(0.06 ) & 1.85(0.25 ) & bzb & c & s & ? + j0133.4 - 4408 & j013321.36 - 441319.4 & & 1.12(0.05 ) & 3.20(0.06 ) & 2.62(0.15 ) & bzq & c & & ? + & j013306.35 - 441421.3 & sumss j013306 - 441422 & 0.83(0.03 ) & 2.25(0.05 ) & 1.92(0.22 ) & bzb & c & s & ? + j0143.6 - 5844 & j014347.39 - 584551.3 & sumss j014347 - 584550 & 0.68(0.03 ) & 1.93(0.06 ) & 1.89(0.29 ) & bzb & c & s , m & ? + j0158.4 + 0107 & j015836.25 + 010632.1 & sdss j015836.23 + 010632.0 & 1.05(0.03 ) & 2.50(0.05 ) & 2.33(0.11 ) & und & c & m , s , qso & 0.723 ? + & j015757.45 + 011547.8 & & 1.06(0.04 ) & 2.52(0.06 ) & 2.18(0.18 ) & und & c & & ? + & j015910.05 + 010514.7 & sdss j015910.05 + 010514.5 & 0.91(0.03 ) & 2.47(0.03 ) & 2.48(0.05 ) & und & c & m , s , x , sy1 & 0.217 + j0158.6 + 8558 & j015550.16 + 854745.1 & & 1.12(0.04 ) & 2.50(0.06 ) & 2.23(0.18 ) & und & c & & ? + & j014935.30 + 860115.3 & & 0.68(0.03 ) & 2.32(0.05 ) & 2.00(0.17 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j0227.7 + 2249 & j022744.35 + 224834.3 & nvss j022744 + 224834 & 0.93(0.03 ) & 2.58(0.03 ) & 2.09(0.08 ) & bzb & b & n , m , v & ? + j0316.1 - 6434 & j031614.31 - 643731.4 & sumss j031614 - 643732 & 0.74(0.03 ) & 2.09(0.06 ) & 1.84(0.26 ) & bzb & c & s , m & ? + j0332.1 + 6309 & j033153.90 + 630814.1 & nvss j033153 + 630814 & 0.77(0.03 ) & 2.38(0.04 ) & 1.96(0.11 ) & bzb & b & n , m & ? + j0409.8 - 0357 & j040946.57 - 040003.4 & nvss j040946 - 040003 & 0.88(0.03 ) & 2.36(0.04 ) & 1.94(0.12 ) & bzb & b & n , m & ? + j0414.9 - 0855 & j041457.01 - 085652.0 & apmuks 041232.66 - 090420.3 & 1.00(0.04 ) & 2.63(0.08 ) & 2.31(0.23 ) & und & c & & ? + j0416.0 - 4355 & j041605.81 - 435514.6 & sumss j041605 - 435516 & 1.11(0.03 ) & 2.89(0.04 ) & 2.44(0.08 ) & bzq & b & s , m & ? + j0431.5 + 3622 & j043103.34 + 362158.7 & & 1.14(0.06 ) & 2.72(0.11 ) & 2.44(0.26 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j0555.9 - 4348 & j055531.59 - 435030.7 & & 1.36(0.05 ) & 3.14(0.06 ) & 2.39(0.18 ) & bzq & c & & ? + & j055618.74 - 435146.1 & sumss j055618 - 435146 & 0.90(0.03 ) & 2.49(0.04 ) & 2.14(0.13 ) & bzb & b & s , m & ? + j0602.7 - 4011 & j060237.10 - 401453.2 & & 0.96(0.03 ) & 2.47(0.03 ) & 2.35(0.06 ) & und & b & m & ? + j0644.6 + 6034 & j064459.38 + 603131.7 & & 0.97(0.04 ) & 2.59(0.06 ) & 2.50(0.15 ) & und & c & m & ? + j0713.5 - 0952 & j071223.28 - 094536.3 & & 1.16(0.04 ) & 3.12(0.05 ) & 2.27(0.08 ) & bzq & c & m & ? + j0723.9 + 2901 & j072354.83 + 285929.9 & nvss j072354 + 285930 & 1.14(0.05 ) & 2.89(0.05 ) & 2.40(0.11 ) & bzq & c & n , f & ? + j0744.1 - 2523 & j074401.10 - 252205.9 & & 1.09(0.04 ) & 2.57(0.03 ) & 2.69(0.05 ) & bzq & c & & ? + & j074402.19 - 252146.0 & & 1.00(0.03 ) & 2.00(0.03 ) & 2.16(0.03 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + j0746.0 - 0222 & j074627.03 - 022549.3 & nvss j074627 - 022549 & 0.67(0.04 ) & 2.09(0.07 ) & 1.99(0.30 ) & bzb & c & n , m & ? + j0756.3 - 6433 & j075624.60 - 643030.6 & & 0.87(0.03 ) & 2.21(0.06 ) & 2.11(0.18 ) & bzb & c & m , v & ? + j0807.0 - 6511 & j080729.66 - 650910.3 & & 1.12(0.05 ) & 3.08(0.07 ) & 2.46(0.17 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j0838.8 - 2828 & j083842.77 - 282830.9 & & 1.03(0.05 ) & 2.73(0.09 ) & 2.24(0.27 ) & und & c & & ? + j0841.3 - 3556 & j084121.63 - 355505.9 & nvss j084121 - 355506 & 0.79(0.03 ) & 2.23(0.03 ) & 1.77(0.11 ) & bzb & b & n , m & ? + j0844.9 + 6214 & j084406.81 + 621458.6 & sdss j084406.83 + 621458.5 & 0.68(0.03 ) & 2.07(0.05 ) & 2.23(0.14 ) & bzb & c & m , s & ? + j0855.4 - 4625 & j085548.43 - 462244.3 & & 1.19(0.03 ) & 2.32(0.03 ) & 2.16(0.04 ) & und & c & & ? + j0858.3 - 4333 & j085839.22 - 432642.7 & & 0.74(0.03 ) & 1.82(0.03 ) & 2.29(0.04 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j0900.9 + 6736 & j090121.65 + 673955.8 & & 0.94(0.05 ) & 2.84(0.08 ) & 2.16(0.26 ) & und & c & m & ? + j0955.0 - 3949 & j095458.30 - 394655.0 & & 0.77(0.04 ) & 2.28(0.05 ) & 2.03(0.18 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j1013.6 + 3434 & j101256.54 + 343648.8 & sdss j101256.54 + 343648.7 & 0.89(0.04 ) & 2.62(0.07 ) & 2.09(0.26 ) & bzb & c & m , s & ? + j1016.1 + 5600 & j101544.44 + 555100.7 & nvss j101544 + 555100 & 1.05(0.06 ) & 3.08(0.09 ) & 2.57(0.25 ) & bzq & c & n , f , s & ? + j1029.5 - 2022 & j102946.66 - 201812.6 & & 1.26(0.06 ) & 2.88(0.10 ) & 2.59(0.26 ) & bzq & c & m & ? + j1032.9 - 8401 & j103015.35 - 840308.7 & sumss j103014 - 840307 & 0.96(0.04 ) & 2.59(0.05 ) & 2.07(0.15 ) & bzb & c & s , v & ? + j1038.2 - 2423 & j103754.92 - 242544.5 & & 1.22(0.04 ) & 3.26(0.04 ) & 2.58(0.10 ) & bzq & c & m & ? + j1207.3 - 5055 & j120750.50 - 510314.9 & & 1.05(0.05 ) & 2.97(0.08 ) & 2.55(0.19 ) & bzq & c & & ? + & j120746.43 - 505948.6 & & 1.14(0.05 ) & 2.87(0.07 ) & 2.53(0.15 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j1254.2 - 2203 & j125422.47 - 220413.6 & nvss j125422 - 220413 & 0.66(0.04 ) & 2.31(0.08 ) & 1.77(0.36 ) & bzb & c & n , m , v & ? + j1259.8 - 3749 & j125949.80 - 374858.1 & nvss j125949 - 374856 & 0.70(0.04 ) & 2.10(0.08 ) & 1.99(0.33 ) & bzb & c & n , s , m , v & ? + j1340.5 - 0412 & j134042.02 - 041006.8 & nvss j134042 - 041006 & 0.71(0.04 ) & 2.11(0.08 ) & 1.85(0.41 ) & bzb & c & n , v & ? + j1346.0 - 2605 & j134621.08 - 255642.3 & & 1.14(0.06 ) & 2.94(0.10 ) & 2.58(0.26 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j1347.0 - 2956 & j134706.89 - 295842.3 & nvss j134706 - 295840 & 0.78(0.03 ) & 2.10(0.06 ) & 1.91(0.23 ) & bzb & c & n , s , m , v & ? + j1404.0 - 5244 & j140313.11 - 524839.5 & & 1.22(0.05 ) & 2.97(0.07 ) & 2.63(0.15 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j1517.2 + 3645 & j151649.26 + 365022.9 & nvss j151649 + 365023 & 0.95(0.03 ) & 2.63(0.04 ) & 2.07(0.12 ) & bzb & c & n , f , s , v & ? + j1612.0 + 1403 & j161118.10 + 140328.9 & sdss j161118.10 + 140328.7 & 1.06(0.06 ) & 3.15(0.09 ) & 2.55(0.22 ) & bzq & c & s & ? + j1614.8 + 4703 & j161450.96 + 465953.7 & sdss j161450.91 + 465953.6 & 1.20(0.04 ) & 2.78(0.06 ) & 2.54(0.16 ) & bzq & c & s & ? + & j161513.04 + 471355.2 & sdss j161513.04 + 471355.4 & 1.17(0.05 ) & 2.86(0.10 ) & 2.61(0.24 ) & bzq & c & s & ? + & j161434.67 + 470420.1 & sdss j161434.67 + 470420.0 & 1.08(0.03 ) & 3.12(0.03 ) & 2.19(0.04 ) & bzq & c & f , m , s , x , x , qso&1.86 + & j161541.22 + 471111.8 & nvss j161543 + 471126 & 0.74(0.03 ) & 2.28(0.04 ) & 2.28(0.09 ) & bzb & c & n , f , m , s , x , xb?&0.199 + j1622.8 - 0314 & j162225.35 - 031439.6 & & 1.10(0.06 ) & 3.19(0.09 ) & 2.67(0.18 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j1627.8 + 3219 & j162800.40 + 322414.0 & sdss j162800.39 + 322413.9 & 1.13(0.05 ) & 2.83(0.10 ) & 2.62(0.24 ) & bzq & c & s & ? + j1647.0 + 4351 & j164619.95 + 435631.0 & nvss j164619 + 435631 & 0.77(0.04 ) & 2.09(0.09 ) & 2.11(0.39 ) & bzb & c & n , f , s , x & ? + j1730.6 - 0353 & j173052.86 - 035247.1 & & 1.16(0.04 ) & 2.92(0.04 ) & 2.28(0.07 ) & bzq & b & m & ? + j1742.5 - 3323 & j174201.11 - 332607.9 & & 0.64(0.05 ) & 1.73(0.03 ) & 1.60(0.03 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + j1745.6 + 0203 & j174507.82 + 015442.5 & nvss j174507 + 015445 & 1.26(0.03 ) & 3.40(0.03 ) & 2.45(0.03 ) & bzq & a & + & j174526.95 + 020532.7 & & 0.94(0.03 ) & 2.57(0.03 ) & 2.27(0.07 ) & und & b & m & ? + j1759.2 - 3853 & j175903.29 - 384739.5 & & 0.58(0.04 ) & 1.93(0.03 ) & 1.50(0.02 ) & bzb & a & m & ? + j1842.3 + 2740 & j184201.25 + 274239.2 & & 1.22(0.06 ) & 3.03(0.08 ) & 2.43(0.22 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j1904.8 - 0705 & j190444.57 - 070740.1 & & 0.91(0.05 ) & 2.79(0.09 ) & 2.45(0.19 ) & und & c & m & ? + j1924.9 - 1036 & j192501.63 - 104316.3 & & 1.24(0.05 ) & 3.25(0.05 ) & 2.66(0.09 ) & bzq & c & m & ? + j2004.6 + 7004 & j200503.41 + 700236.3 & & 1.17(0.05 ) & 2.95(0.07 ) & 2.21(0.24 ) & bzq & c & & ? + & j200506.02 + 700439.3 & nvss j200506 + 700440 & 0.70(0.03 ) & 2.11(0.05 ) & 2.11(0.18 ) & bzb & c & n , v & ? + j2021.5 + 0632 & j202154.66 + 062908.7 & & 0.96(0.04 ) & 2.67(0.06 ) & 2.47(0.10 ) & und & c & m & ? + & j202155.45 + 062913.7 & nvss j202155 + 062914 & 0.80(0.03 ) & 2.09(0.05 ) & 1.78(0.17 ) & bzb & c & n , m & ? + j2114.1 + 5440 & j211508.92 + 544815.7 & & 1.11(0.03 ) & 2.50(0.03 ) & 2.52(0.04 ) & bzq & b & m & ? + j2133.9 + 6645 & j213349.21 + 664704.3 & nvss j213349 + 664706 & 0.67(0.04 ) & 2.12(0.06 ) & 1.86(0.22 ) & bzb & c & n , v & ? + j2134.6 - 2130 & j213430.18 - 213032.6 & nvss j213430 - 213032 & 0.77(0.04 ) & 2.26(0.08 ) & 1.78(0.42 ) & bzb & c & n , m & ? + j2300.0 - 3553 & j230010.16 - 360159.9 & 6df j2300101 - 360200 & 1.17(0.06 ) & 3.36(0.08 ) & 2.43(0.22 ) & bzq & c & m,6,qso & 2.357 + j2319.3 - 3830 & j232000.11 - 383511.4 & mrss 347 - 103293 & 1.12(0.05 ) & 3.06(0.07 ) & 2.60(0.16 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j2358.4 - 1811 & j235828.61 - 181526.6 & & 1.09(0.04 ) & 2.60(0.06 ) & 2.46(0.15 ) & und & c & m & ? + + col . ( 1 ) 2fgl name ( 2 ) _ wise _ name . ( 3 ) other name if present in literature and in the following order : roma - bzcat , nvss , sdss , at20 g , ned . ( 4,5,6 ) infrared colors from the _ wise _ all sky catalog corrected for galactic extinciton . values in parentheses are 1@xmath12 uncertainties ( 7 ) type of candidate according to our method : bzb - bzq - und ( undetermined ) ( 8) class of candidate according to our method . ( 9 ) notes : n = nvss , f = first , s = sumss , a = at20 g , m = 2mass , s = sdss dr9 , 6 = 6dfgs , x = _ xmm - newton _ or _ chandra _ , x = rosat ; qso = quasar , sy = seyfert , lnr = liner , bl = bl lac , xb = x - ray bright optically inactive galaxies ; v = variability in _ wise _ ( var_flag @xmath11 5 in at least one band ) . + col . ( 10 ) redshift : ( ? ) = unknown , ( number ? ) = uncertain . [ tab : ugs ] [ 12]-[22 ] & type & class & notes & z + name & name & name & mag & mag & mag & & & & + j0233.9 + 6238c & j023418.09 + 624207.8 & & 0.80(0.03 ) & 2.02(0.04 ) & 2.31(0.06 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + & j023238.07 + 623651.9 & & 1.25(0.05 ) & 3.05(0.06 ) & 2.46(0.11 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j0341.8 + 3148c & j034204.35 + 314711.4 & & 0.48(0.03 ) & 1.70(0.03 ) & 1.78(0.08 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + & j034141.11 + 314804.5 & & 0.93(0.03 ) & 2.47(0.05 ) & 2.20(0.13 ) & und & c & m , v & ? + & j034158.52 + 314855.7 & & 0.64(0.04 ) & 1.37(0.03 ) & 1.50(0.02 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j0423.4 + 5612 & j042430.44 + 561525.8 & & 1.19(0.06 ) & 2.98(0.13 ) & 2.47(0.26 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j0440.5 + 2554c & j043947.48 + 260140.5 & cxo j043947.5 + 260140 & 0.47(0.03 ) & 1.47(0.03 ) & 1.90(0.04 ) & bzb & a & m , x , x & ? + j0543.2 - 0120c & j054324.78 - 011545.6 & & 0.69(0.03 ) & 1.64(0.04 ) & 1.86(0.11 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + j0547.5 - 0141c & j054758.25 - 013616.6 & & 1.06(0.04 ) & 2.60(0.06 ) & 2.20(0.19 ) & und & c & & ? + j0607.5 - 0618c & j060659.94 - 061641.5 & cxo j060700.1 - 061641 & 1.17(0.04 ) & 2.45(0.07 ) & 2.33(0.18 ) & ? & c & x & ? + j0616.6 + 2425 & j061549.51 + 241654.0 & & 1.12(0.06 ) & 2.94(0.09 ) & 2.44(0.23 ) & bzq & c & & ? + & j061641.04 + 241138.4 & & 0.87(0.03 ) & 1.76(0.07 ) & 1.88(0.23 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j0620.8 - 2556 & j062108.68 - 255757.9 & nvss j062108 - 255757 & 0.95(0.05 ) & 2.75(0.08 ) & 2.26(0.26 ) & ? & c & n & ? + j0631.7 + 0428 & j063104.12 + 042012.6 & & 1.08(0.03 ) & 2.44(0.03 ) & 2.56(0.03 ) & bzq & a & m & ? + j0634.3 + 0356c & j063459.32 + 040808.6 & & 1.13(0.03 ) & 2.11(0.03 ) & 2.73(0.04 ) & bzq & c & m , v & ? + & j063519.84 + 035047.1 & & 1.36(0.04 ) & 2.73(0.05 ) & 2.36(0.08 ) & bzq & c & m & ? + j0637.0 + 0416c & j063705.96 + 042537.2 & & 0.82(0.03 ) & 2.17(0.04 ) & 2.11(0.06 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + & j063701.93 + 042037.2 & & 0.86(0.03 ) & 2.17(0.03 ) & 2.17(0.03 ) & bzb & a & m , v & ? + & j063703.09 + 042146.1 & & 0.60(0.03 ) & 1.99(0.07 ) & 2.06(0.12 ) & bzb & c & m , v & ? + & j063647.19 + 042058.7 & & 0.52(0.03 ) & 1.79(0.05 ) & 1.93(0.18 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j0708.5 - 1020c & j070807.98 - 102743.9 & & 0.55(0.03 ) & 1.55(0.05 ) & 1.97(0.11 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + & j070809.69 - 102805.8 & & 1.35(0.03 ) & 2.91(0.03 ) & 2.50(0.04 ) & bzq & b & & ? + & j070806.04 - 102736.2 & & 0.62(0.03 ) & 1.87(0.03 ) & 2.07(0.05 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + & j070813.96 - 102840.2 & & 0.89(0.03 ) & 1.73(0.05 ) & 2.21(0.09 ) & bzb & c & & ? + & j070826.05 - 103001.2 & & 1.18(0.04 ) & 2.88(0.04 ) & 2.48(0.05 ) & bzq & b & m , v & ? + & j070816.06 - 102832.0 & & 0.72(0.03 ) & 1.51(0.06 ) & 1.95(0.18 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j0742.7 - 3113 & j074303.55 - 312057.3 & & 1.04(0.05 ) & 2.57(0.10 ) & 2.22(0.34 ) & und & c & & ? + j0748.5 - 2204 & j074835.46 - 215740.0 & & 1.32(0.05 ) & 2.80(0.07 ) & 2.68(0.14 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j0900.5 - 4441c & j090039.83 - 443510.0 & 2masx j09003978 - 4435094 & 1.08(0.03 ) & 1.48(0.03 ) & 2.32(0.02 ) & bzb & c & m , v & ? + j0914.1 - 4756 & j091319.84 - 475730.8 & & 1.08(0.03 ) & 1.71(0.03 ) & 2.20(0.03 ) & bzb & a & & ? + j0922.2 - 5214c & j092154.24 - 521236.1 & & 1.19(0.03 ) & 2.43(0.03 ) & 2.52(0.02 ) & bzq & a & m & ? + j1027.4 - 5730c & j102703.87 - 572830.7 & & 1.14(0.04 ) & 2.81(0.05 ) & 2.59(0.06 ) & bzq & b & m , v & ? + j1059.9 - 2051 & j110025.72 - 205333.4 & 2masx j11002568 - 2053333 & 0.89(0.03 ) & 2.46(0.05 ) & 1.99(0.14 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + j1208.6 - 2257 & j120816.33 - 224921.9 & & 0.98(0.04 ) & 2.25(0.05 ) & 2.00(0.18 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j1248.6 - 5510 & j124946.07 - 550758.6 & & 0.95(0.04 ) & 2.71(0.05 ) & 2.52(0.12 ) & und & c & & ? + j1255.8 - 5828 & j125459.44 - 582009.5 & & 1.20(0.03 ) & 2.61(0.04 ) & 2.25(0.05 ) & und & c & m & ? + & j125357.07 - 583322.3 & & 0.62(0.04 ) & 2.04(0.03 ) & 1.56(0.02 ) & bzb & a & m , v & ? + j1315.6 - 0730 & j131543.62 - 073659.0 & & 0.93(0.04 ) & 2.39(0.06 ) & 2.15(0.21 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + & j131552.98 - 073301.9 & nvss j131552 - 073301 & 0.87(0.03 ) & 2.27(0.04 ) & 2.04(0.08 ) & bzb & b & n , f , m,6,v , bl ? & ? + j1324.4 - 5411 & j132415.49 - 541104.4 & & 1.33(0.05 ) & 2.88(0.07 ) & 2.46(0.18 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j1345.8 - 3356 & j134543.05 - 335643.3 & nvss j134543 - 335643 & 0.82(0.04 ) & 2.31(0.06 ) & 2.09(0.20 ) & bzb & c & n , m & ? + j1407.4 - 2948 & j140818.86 - 294203.2 & & 1.10(0.06 ) & 2.82(0.12 ) & 2.70(0.28 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j1512.5 - 6247c & j151156.72 - 625231.1 & & 1.20(0.10 ) & 2.68(0.09 ) & 2.68(0.18 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j1624.2 - 2124 & j162343.89 - 210707.0 & & 1.34(0.05 ) & 2.86(0.08 ) & 2.74(0.16 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j1632.6 - 2328c & j163306.53 - 233207.3 & & 1.07(0.03 ) & 2.71(0.04 ) & 2.43(0.09 ) & und & c & m & ? + j1639.8 - 4921c & j163907.38 - 492605.6 & & 0.64(0.05 ) & 1.66(0.03 ) & 1.64(0.03 ) & bzb & b & m , v & ? + j1716.6 - 0526c & j171717.66 - 052520.1 & & 1.25(0.04 ) & 2.95(0.04 ) & 2.37(0.06 ) & bzq & b & m & ? + j1747.2 - 3507 & j174741.23 - 350334.3 & & 0.58(0.05 ) & 1.80(0.03 ) & 1.41(0.02 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + j1749.7 - 3134c & j174943.85 - 314054.7 & & 0.92(0.03 ) & 1.15(0.03 ) & 1.74(0.02 ) & bzb & c & m , v & ? + & j174949.84 - 313045.6 & & 1.10(0.03 ) & 1.95(0.03 ) & 2.30(0.02 ) & ? & a & m & ? + j1754.1 - 2930 & j175414.40 - 293326.6 & & 0.68(0.06 ) & 1.81(0.04 ) & 1.48(0.05 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j1829.8 - 0204c & j182927.72 - 020531.5 & & 0.55(0.03 ) & 1.52(0.03 ) & 1.94(0.04 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + & j182958.23 - 015805.1 & & 0.71(0.03 ) & 1.24(0.03 ) & 1.77(0.04 ) & bzb & a & m & ? + & j183009.32 - 020723.2 & & 0.75(0.03 ) & 1.48(0.04 ) & 1.84(0.06 ) & bzb & b & m , v & ? + j1835.4 + 1036 & j183551.92 + 103056.8 & & 0.94(0.03 ) & 2.82(0.04 ) & 2.56(0.06 ) & und & c & m & ? + j1835.4 + 1349 & j183522.00 + 135733.9 & & 1.12(0.04 ) & 2.61(0.05 ) & 2.20(0.14 ) & und & c & m & ? + & j183535.34 + 134848.8 & & 0.65(0.04 ) & 2.14(0.05 ) & 2.10(0.15 ) & bzb & c & m & ? + j1837.9 + 3821 & j183828.80 + 382704.3 & & 1.04(0.05 ) & 2.64(0.09 ) & 2.52(0.24 ) & und & c & & ? + & j183656.31 + 382232.8 & & 1.15(0.04 ) & 2.97(0.04 ) & 2.53(0.08 ) & bzq & b & & ? + & j183837.16 + 381900.5 & & 0.90(0.04 ) & 2.14(0.08 ) & 1.84(0.34 ) & bzb & c & & ? + j1844.3 + 1548 & j184425.36 + 154645.9 & nvss j184425 + 154646 & 0.80(0.03 ) & 2.30(0.04 ) & 2.06(0.08 ) & bzb & b & n , m & ? + j1844.9 - 1116 & j184456.29 - 111352.1 & & 0.67(0.06 ) & 1.63(0.03 ) & 1.50(0.02 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + j1857.6 + 0211 & j185727.36 + 021216.4 & & 0.77(0.07 ) & 2.26(0.07 ) & 1.81(0.02 ) & bzb & b & m , v & ? + j1944.3 + 7325 & j194343.83 + 731738.7 & & 1.30(0.04 ) & 2.84(0.06 ) & 2.36(0.16 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j1958.6 + 4020 & j195842.28 + 401125.8 & & 1.11(0.05 ) & 2.82(0.06 ) & 2.41(0.14 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j2042.0 + 4252c & j204241.58 + 424150.3 & & 1.28(0.05 ) & 2.38(0.07 ) & 2.63(0.07 ) & bzq & c & m , v & ? + j2124.0 - 1513 & j212423.63 - 152558.2 & & 1.14(0.06 ) & 3.15(0.11 ) & 2.56(0.26 ) & bzq & c & & ? + j2128.7 + 5824 & j212810.83 + 583336.6 & & 1.21(0.04 ) & 2.82(0.06 ) & 2.22(0.17 ) & bzq & c & & ? + & j212820.65 + 582053.4 & & 0.54(0.03 ) & 1.86(0.03 ) & 1.78(0.10 ) & bzb & b & m , v & ? + & j212900.37 + 583128.0 & & 1.04(0.04 ) & 2.37(0.13 ) & 2.43(0.29 ) & und & c & & ? + j2201.2 + 5926 & j215953.42 + 591227.1 & & 0.94(0.04 ) & 2.13(0.05 ) & 2.17(0.10 ) & bzb & b & m & ? + + col . ( 1 ) 2fgl name ( 2 ) _ wise _ ( 3 ) other name if present in literature and in the following order : roma - bzcat , nvss , sdss , at20 g , ned ( 4,5,6 ) infrared colors from the _ wise _ all sky catalog corrected for galactic extinciton . values in parentheses are 1@xmath12 uncertainties . + col . ( 7 ) type of candidate according to our method : bzb - bzq - und ( undetermined ) . ( 8) class of candidate according to our method . ( 9 ) notes : n = nvss , f = first , s = sumss , a = at20 g , m = 2mass , s = sdss dr9 , 6 = 6dfgs , x = _ xmm - newton _ or _ chandra _ , x = rosat ; qso = quasar , sy = seyfert , lnr = liner , bl = bl lac ; v = variability in _ wise _ ( var_flag @xmath11 5 in at least one band ) . + col . ( 10 ) redshift : ( ? ) = unknown , ( number ? ) = uncertain . [ tab : ugf ] [ 12]-[22 ] & type & class & notes & z & reassoc . + name & name & name & mag & mag & mag & & & & & flag + j0009.1 + 5030 & j000922.76 + 503028.8 & nvssj000922 + 503028 & 0.72(0.03 ) & 2.19(0.05 ) & 1.95(0.21 ) & bzb & c & m , v & ? & yes + j0018.8 - 8154 & j001920.58 - 815251.3 & sumssj001921 - 815251 & 0.87(0.03 ) & 2.30(0.03 ) & 1.98(0.07 ) & bzb & b & m , bl & ? & yes + j0022.2 - 1853 & j002209.25 - 185334.7 & nvssj002209 - 185332 & 0.87(0.03 ) & 2.27(0.04 ) & 1.83(0.12 ) & bzb & b & m & ? & yes + j0022.3 - 5141 & j002200.08 - 514024.2 & sumssj002159 - 514026 & 0.81(0.03 ) & 2.23(0.04 ) & 1.87(0.14 ) & bzb & b & m , v & ? & yes + j0045.5 + 1218 & j004543.33 + 121712.0 & nvssj004543 + 121710 & 0.80(0.03 ) & 2.23(0.05 ) & 2.03(0.14 ) & bzb & b & m & ? & yes + j0051.4 - 6241 & j005116.62 - 624204.3 & sumssj005116 - 624205 & 0.69(0.04 ) & 2.20(0.06 ) & 1.75(0.32 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j0059.7 - 5700 & j005846.56 - 565911.4 & sumssj005846 - 565912 & 1.03(0.03 ) & 2.92(0.04 ) & 2.64(0.07 ) & bzq & b & m & ? & yes + j0110.3 + 6805 & j011012.84 + 680541.1 & bzuj0110 + 6805 & 0.67(0.03 ) & 2.12(0.03 ) & 2.02(0.04 ) & bzb & a & m & ? & yes + j0134.4 + 2636 & j013428.19 + 263843.0 & nvssj013427 + 263842 & 0.80(0.04 ) & 2.00(0.08 ) & 1.93(0.33 ) & bzb & c & m , v & ? & yes + j0156.4 + 3909 & j015631.40 + 391430.9 & nvssj015631 + 391431 & 1.13(0.04 ) & 2.76(0.05 ) & 2.47(0.11 ) & bzq & c & m , v & ? & yes + j0156.5 - 2419 & j015606.46 - 241754.3 & & 1.21(0.06 ) & 2.93(0.11 ) & 2.63(0.26 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + j0207.9 - 6832 & j020750.91 - 683755.1 & sumssj020750 - 683755 & 1.03(0.04 ) & 2.70(0.05 ) & 2.28(0.12 ) & und & c & & ? & yes + j0210.7 - 5102 & j021046.19 - 510101.8 & bzuj0210 - 5101 & 1.13(0.03 ) & 2.97(0.03 ) & 2.39(0.04 ) & bzq & a & m & 1.003 & yes + j0238.2 - 3905 & j023749.42 - 390050.3 & & 0.92(0.03 ) & 2.40(0.04 ) & 2.36(0.08 ) & bzb & c & m,6 & 0.323 ? & no + & j023800.62 - 390504.6 & nvssj023800 - 390504 & 0.68(0.04 ) & 2.18(0.07 ) & 1.91(0.27 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j0248.6 + 8440 & j024948.30 + 843556.9 & nvssj024948 + 843556 & 0.92(0.03 ) & 2.63(0.04 ) & 2.13(0.09 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j0253.4 + 3218 & j025333.64 + 321720.8 & nvssj025333 + 321721 & 1.12(0.04 ) & 2.87(0.06 ) & 2.46(0.16 ) & bzq & c & m & ? & yes + j0309.3 - 0743 & j030943.23 - 074427.4 & nvssj030943 - 074427 & 0.70(0.03 ) & 2.15(0.06 ) & 2.01(0.21 ) & bzb & c & m , v & ? & yes + j0332.5 - 1118 & j033200.72 - 111456.1 & 6dfj0332006 - 111456 & 1.30(0.03 ) & 3.05(0.03 ) & 2.63(0.04 ) & bzq & a & m,6,bl & ? & no + & j033223.25 - 111950.6 & nvssj033223 - 111951 & 0.96(0.03 ) & 2.58(0.03 ) & 2.23(0.05 ) & und & c & m , v & ? & yes + j0333.7 + 2918 & j033349.00 + 291631.6 & nvssj033349 + 291631 & 0.77(0.03 ) & 2.02(0.05 ) & 2.18(0.13 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j0334.3 + 6538 & j033356.74 + 653656.0 & nvssj033356 + 653656 & 0.75(0.03 ) & 2.07(0.05 ) & 1.73(0.17 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j0424.3 - 5332 & j042347.22 - 533026.6 & & 1.27(0.04 ) & 2.86(0.04 ) & 2.30(0.12 ) & bzq & c & m & ? & no + & j042504.26 - 533158.3 & sumssj042504 - 533158 & 0.99(0.03 ) & 2.58(0.03 ) & 2.12(0.04 ) & bzb & c & m , v & ? & yes + j0433.4 - 6029 & j043334.08 - 603013.7 & sumssj043333 - 603014 & 1.15(0.04 ) & 3.04(0.04 ) & 2.49(0.07 ) & bzq & b & m & ? & yes + j0433.9 - 5726 & j043344.12 - 572613.3 & & 0.90(0.04 ) & 2.23(0.07 ) & 2.20(0.27 ) & bzb & c & & ? & no + j0438.8 - 4521 & j043900.84 - 452222.6 & sumssj043900 - 452223 & 1.14(0.04 ) & 3.09(0.04 ) & 2.45(0.08 ) & bzq & b & & ? & yes + j0440.4 + 1433 & j044021.14 + 143757.0 & nvssj044021 + 143757 & 1.13(0.05 ) & 2.88(0.08 ) & 2.54(0.20 ) & bzq & c & & ? & yes + j0456.5 + 2658 & j045617.36 + 270221.1 & nvssj045617 + 270221 & 0.95(0.04 ) & 2.68(0.07 ) & 2.35(0.17 ) & und & c & & ? & yes + j0505.9 + 6116 & j050558.78 + 611335.9 & nvssj050558 + 611336 & 0.65(0.04 ) & 1.83(0.08 ) & 1.69(0.45 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j0506.7 - 5435 & j050657.80 - 543503.9 & sumssj050657 - 543459 & 0.74(0.03 ) & 1.89(0.05 ) & 2.02(0.19 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j0508.1 - 1936 & j050805.75 - 194721.6 & & 1.11(0.04 ) & 2.79(0.07 ) & 2.72(0.13 ) & bzq & c & m & ? & no + j0512.9 + 4040 & j051252.53 + 404143.7 & nvssj051252 + 404143 & 0.90(0.03 ) & 2.50(0.03 ) & 2.13(0.03 ) & bzb & a & m & ? & yes + j0525.5 - 6011 & j052537.74 - 601732.0 & & 1.11(0.04 ) & 3.25(0.05 ) & 2.68(0.12 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + j0532.0 - 4826 & j053158.61 - 482736.0 & sumssj053158 - 482737 & 0.89(0.03 ) & 2.46(0.03 ) & 2.06(0.03 ) & bzb & a & v & ? & yes + j0537.7 - 5716 & j053748.95 - 571830.2 & sumssj053748 - 571828 & 0.83(0.03 ) & 2.34(0.04 ) & 2.16(0.09 ) & bzb & b & m & ? & yes + j0609.4 - 0248 & j060915.06 - 024754.6 & nvssj060915 - 024754 & 0.78(0.04 ) & 1.97(0.08 ) & 1.71(0.37 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j0621.9 + 3750 & j062157.63 + 375057.0 & nvssj062157 + 375056 & 1.14(0.05 ) & 2.94(0.07 ) & 2.52(0.17 ) & bzq & c & & ? & yes + j0644.2 - 6713 & j064428.06 - 671257.3 & sumssj064427 - 671257 & 1.06(0.03 ) & 2.78(0.02 ) & 2.26(0.03 ) & und & a & & ? & yes + j0647.8 - 6102 & j064740.85 - 605805.2 & sumssj064740 - 605804 & 1.10(0.04 ) & 2.96(0.06 ) & 2.34(0.16 ) & bzq & c & v & ? & yes + & j064806.55 - 610507.4 & & 1.38(0.04 ) & 3.03(0.05 ) & 2.48(0.12 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + j0653.7 + 2818 & j065344.26 + 281547.5 & nvssj065343 + 281546 & 0.81(0.04 ) & 2.30(0.07 ) & 1.98(0.26 ) & bzb & c & n , m & ? & no + j0700.3 + 1710 & j070001.50 + 170921.8 & nvssj070001 + 170922 & 1.11(0.04 ) & 2.97(0.04 ) & 2.50(0.07 ) & bzq & b & & ? & yes + & j070046.29 + 171019.8 & & 1.08(0.04 ) & 2.62(0.08 ) & 2.18(0.24 ) & und & c & m & ? & no + j0702.7 - 1951 & j070242.90 - 195122.2 & nvssj070242 - 195123 & 1.02(0.04 ) & 2.70(0.04 ) & 2.15(0.10 ) & ? & b & m & ? & yes + j0703.1 - 3912 & j070312.64 - 391418.9 & nvssj070312 - 391418 & 0.94(0.03 ) & 2.51(0.04 ) & 2.15(0.09 ) & bzb & b & m & ? & yes + j0706.5 + 7741 & j070651.32 + 774137.0 & nvssj070651 + 774137 & 0.90(0.03 ) & 2.46(0.03 ) & 1.91(0.08 ) & bzb & b & m & ? & yes + j0706.7 - 4845 & j070549.12 - 483911.4 & & 0.95(0.04 ) & 2.86(0.06 ) & 2.38(0.19 ) & und & c & m & ? & no + j0709.3 - 0256 & j070945.05 - 025517.4 & nvssj070945 - 025517 & 1.09(0.03 ) & 2.91(0.03 ) & 2.30(0.06 ) & und & c & v & ? & yes + j0726.0 - 0053 & j072550.63 - 005456.4 & bzuj0725 - 0054 & 1.08(0.03 ) & 2.98(0.03 ) & 2.45(0.03 ) & bzq & a & m & 0.128 & yes + j0734.2 - 7706 & j073443.44 - 771113.4 & sumssj073441 - 771113 & 1.04(0.04 ) & 3.20(0.05 ) & 2.48(0.11 ) & bzq & c & & ? & yes + j0746.5 - 0713 & j074627.48 - 070949.7 & nvssj074627 - 070951 & 1.10(0.04 ) & 3.04(0.07 ) & 2.33(0.18 ) & und & c & m & ? & yes + j0746.5 - 4758 & j074642.30 - 475455.2 & sumssj074642 - 475455 & 1.15(0.03 ) & 2.91(0.06 ) & 1.89(0.16 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j0816.7 - 2420 & j081639.46 - 242635.4 & & 1.13(0.07 ) & 3.20(0.11 ) & 2.59(0.30 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + & j081640.41 - 242106.6 & nvssj081640 - 242105 & 1.10(0.04 ) & 3.04(0.04 ) & 2.45(0.09 ) & bzq & b & & ? & yes + j0823.0 + 4041 & j082257.55 + 404149.8 & nvssj082257 + 404149 & 1.15(0.04 ) & 2.91(0.04 ) & 2.32(0.07 ) & bzq & c & qso & 0.8657 & yes + j0844.8 - 5459 & j084502.47 - 545808.5 & at20gj084502 - 545808 & 1.02(0.03 ) & 2.82(0.03 ) & 2.31(0.04 ) & und & b & m & ? & yes + j0849.9 - 3540 & j084945.61 - 354101.2 & nvssj084945 - 354102 & 1.01(0.03 ) & 2.53(0.04 ) & 2.35(0.08 ) & und & b & v & ? & yes + j0852.4 - 5756 & j085238.73 - 575529.4 & at20gj085238 - 575530 & 1.23(0.03 ) & 2.87(0.03 ) & 2.38(0.03 ) & bzq & a & & ? & yes + j0853.1 - 3659 & j085310.50 - 365823.1 & nvssj085310 - 365820 & 0.77(0.04 ) & 2.32(0.04 ) & 1.98(0.08 ) & bzb & b & n , m & ? & no + j0855.1 - 0712 & j085435.20 - 071837.5 & & 1.10(0.03 ) & 3.03(0.03 ) & 2.48(0.05 ) & bzq & b & m & ? & no + j0856.0 + 7136 & j085654.85 + 714623.8 & nvssj085654 + 714624 & 1.09(0.04 ) & 2.97(0.04 ) & 2.49(0.07 ) & bzq & b & m & ? & yes + j0858.1 - 1952 & j085805.36 - 195036.8 & nvssj085805 - 195036 & 1.16(0.04 ) & 2.80(0.05 ) & 2.25(0.11 ) & und & c & m , qso & 0.6597 & yes + j0904.8 - 3513 & j090423.42 - 351203.0 & & 1.24(0.06 ) & 2.82(0.10 ) & 2.37(0.32 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + j0906.2 - 0906 & j090618.05 - 090544.9 & nvssj090618 - 090544 & 1.01(0.04 ) & 2.56(0.05 ) & 2.36(0.12 ) & und & c & m & ? & yes + j0919.3 - 2203 & j092002.74 - 215835.0 & & 1.01(0.04 ) & 2.76(0.06 ) & 2.21(0.19 ) & und & c & m & ? & no + j0940.8 - 6105 & j094047.33 - 610728.5 & at20gj094047 - 610726 & 0.87(0.03 ) & 2.57(0.03 ) & 2.17(0.06 ) & bzb & b & m , v & ? & yes + j0941.9 - 0755 & j094221.46 - 075953.1 & nvssj094221 - 075953 & 0.95(0.03 ) & 2.50(0.03 ) & 2.21(0.07 ) & bzb & b & v & ? & yes + j0946.9 - 2541 & j094709.52 - 254100.0 & nvssj094709 - 254100 & 0.72(0.04 ) & 2.16(0.06 ) & 2.06(0.23 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j1016.2 - 0638 & j101542.96 - 063055.1 & & 0.93(0.04 ) & 2.91(0.07 ) & 2.48(0.16 ) & und & c & & ? & no + & j101626.98 - 063625.2 & nvssj101626 - 06362 & 0.91(0.04 ) & 2.88(0.07 ) & 2.38(0.18 ) & und & c & n , f & ? & no + j1045.5 - 2931 & j104540.62 - 292726.4 & nvssj104540 - 292725 & 1.09(0.05 ) & 3.13(0.06 ) & 2.33(0.17 ) & bzq & c & & ? & yes + j1103.9 - 5356 & j110352.22 - 535700.7 & at20gj110352 - 535700 & 0.98(0.03 ) & 2.88(0.03 ) & 2.22(0.03 ) & ? & a & m , v & & yes + j1106.3 - 3643 & j110624.04 - 364659.0 & nvssj110624 - 364659 & 1.08(0.04 ) & 2.65(0.06 ) & 2.39(0.16 ) & ? & c & & ? & yes + j1154.1 - 3242 & j115406.16 - 324243.0 & nvssj115406 - 324242 & 1.02(0.04 ) & 2.87(0.05 ) & 2.41(0.12 ) & ? & c & m , v & ? & yes + j1230.2 - 5258 & j122939.88 - 530332.1 & at20gj122939 - 530332 & 0.66(0.04 ) & 2.22(0.07 ) & 1.90(0.27 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & no + j1238.1 - 1953 & j123824.40 - 195913.4 & nvssj123824 - 195913 & 0.88(0.03 ) & 2.46(0.04 ) & 2.13(0.11 ) & bzb & b & m & ? & yes + j1239.5 + 0728 & j123924.58 + 073017.2 & bzuj1239 + 0730 & 1.07(0.03 ) & 2.96(0.04 ) & 2.32(0.07 ) & ? & c & m & 0.4 & no + + col . ( 1 ) 2fgl name ( 2 ) _ wise _ name . ( 3 ) other name if present in literature and in the following order : roma - bzcat , nvss , sdss , at20 g , ned . ( 4,5,6 ) infrared colors from the _ wise _ all sky catalog corrected for galactic extinciton . values in parentheses are 1@xmath12 uncertainties ( 7 ) type of candidate according to our method : bzb - bzq - und ( undetermined ) . ( 8) class of candidate according to our method . ( 9 ) notes : n = nvss , f = first , s = sumss , a = at20 g , m = 2mass , s = sdss dr9 , 6 = 6dfgs , x = _ xmm - newton _ or _ chandra _ , x = rosat ; qso = quasar , sy = seyfert , lnr = liner , bl = bl lac ; v = variability in _ wise _ ( var_flag @xmath11 5 in at least one band ) ( 10 ) redshift : ( ? ) = unknown , ( number ? ) = uncertain . ( 11 ) re - association flag : `` yes '' if the association of our method corresponds to the one provided in the 2fgl , `` no '' otherwise . [ tab : agu1 ] [ 12]-[22 ] & type & class & notes & z & reassoc . + name & name & name & mag & mag & mag & & & & & flag + j1301.6 + 3331 & j130147.03 + 332236.3 & sdssj130147.01 + 332236.4 & 1.04(0.03 ) & 2.46(0.04 ) & 2.27(0.08 ) & und & b & m , s & ? & no + j1303.8 - 5537 & j130349.23 - 554031.6 & at20gj130349 - 554031 & 1.01(0.03 ) & 2.87(0.03 ) & 2.35(0.03 ) & und & a & m , v & ? & yes + j1304.1 - 2415 & j130416.70 - 241216.6 & nvssj130416 - 24121 & 0.89(0.03 ) & 2.37(0.05 ) & 2.01(0.15 ) & bzb & c & n , m & ? & no + j1304.3 - 4353 & j130421.01 - 435310.2 & sumssj130420 - 435308 & 0.84(0.03 ) & 2.24(0.03 ) & 1.93(0.05 ) & bzb & b & m , v & ? & yes + j1307.5 - 4300 & j130737.98 - 425938.9 & sumssj130737 - 42594 & 0.73(0.03 ) & 2.04(0.03 ) & 1.90(0.08 ) & bzb & b & s , m,6,v & ? & no + j1307.6 - 6704 & j130817.51 - 670705.8 & at20gj130817 - 670704 & 0.77(0.03 ) & 2.55(0.04 ) & 2.28(0.06 ) & bzb & b & m , v & ? & yes + j1329.2 - 5608 & j132901.16 - 560802.5 & at20gj132901 - 560802 & 1.05(0.03 ) & 2.78(0.03 ) & 2.22(0.07 ) & und & b & m , v & ? & yes + j1330.1 - 7002 & j133011.34 - 700312.7 & at20gj133010 - 700313 & 0.78(0.03 ) & 2.48(0.03 ) & 2.25(0.04 ) & bzb & b & & ? & yes + j1351.3 - 2909 & j135146.85 - 291217.4 & bzuj1351 - 2912 & 1.12(0.03 ) & 2.87(0.03 ) & 2.48(0.05 ) & bzq & b & v & 1.034 ? & no + j1406.2 - 2510 & j140609.60 - 250809.2 & nvssj140609 - 250808 & 0.83(0.04 ) & 2.37(0.07 ) & 2.02(0.25 ) & bzb & c & m , v & ? & yes + j1416.3 - 2415 & j141554.91 - 241925.8 & nvssj141554 - 241924 & 1.26(0.05 ) & 3.13(0.08 ) & 2.51(0.22 ) & bzq & c & n & ? & no + & j141642.23 - 241021.2 & & 0.92(0.04 ) & 2.71(0.08 ) & 2.39(0.23 ) & und & c & m & ? & no + j1419.4 - 0835 & j141922.56 - 083831.9 & nvssj141922 - 083830 & 1.01(0.03 ) & 2.78(0.04 ) & 2.15(0.09 ) & und & b & v & ? & yes + j1514.6 - 4751 & j151440.03 - 474829.7 & at20gj151440 - 474828 & 1.14(0.04 ) & 3.07(0.04 ) & 2.43(0.06 ) & bzq & b & m & ? & yes + j1518.2 - 2733 & j151803.60 - 273131.0 & nvssj151803 - 273131 & 0.62(0.03 ) & 2.14(0.04 ) & 2.18(0.10 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j1553.2 - 2424 & j155331.62 - 242206.0 & nvssj155331 - 242206 & 1.16(0.04 ) & 2.95(0.07 ) & 2.66(0.14 ) & bzq & c & & 0.332 ? & yes + j1558.3 + 8513 & j160031.76 + 850949.2 & nvssj160031 + 850948 & 0.82(0.03 ) & 2.18(0.04 ) & 2.02(0.14 ) & bzb & b & n , m & ? & no + j1604.5 - 4442 & j160431.03 - 444131.9 & at20gj160431 - 444131 & 0.98(0.03 ) & 2.80(0.03 ) & 2.46(0.05 ) & und & b & m & ? & yes + j1626.0 - 7636 & j162638.17 - 763855.4 & sumssj162639 - 763856 & 0.56(0.03 ) & 2.21(0.05 ) & 1.97(0.19 ) & bzb & c & m , v & ? & yes + j1650.1 - 5044 & j165016.63 - 504448.2 & at20gj165016 - 504446 & 0.95(0.04 ) & 2.65(0.04 ) & 2.22(0.09 ) & und & b & m , v & ? & yes + j1725.1 - 7714 & j172350.86 - 771350.3 & sumssj172350 - 771350 & 1.01(0.03 ) & 2.67(0.04 ) & 2.33(0.08 ) & und & b & m , v & ? & yes + j1759.2 - 4819 & j175858.45 - 482112.4 & sumssj175858 - 482112 & 0.91(0.03 ) & 2.62(0.03 ) & 2.21(0.05 ) & und & c & & ? & yes + j1811.0 + 5340 & j181037.99 + 533501.5 & nvssj181038 + 533501 & 0.83(0.03 ) & 2.22(0.05 ) & 2.15(0.15 ) & bzb & c & n , m , x & ? & no + j1815.6 - 6407 & j181425.96 - 641008.8 & & 1.27(0.06 ) & 3.05(0.08 ) & 2.67(0.19 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + j1816.7 - 4942 & j181655.99 - 494344.7 & sumssj181655 - 494344 & 0.99(0.05 ) & 2.86(0.07 ) & 2.21(0.19 ) & und & c & & ? & yes + j1818.7 + 2138 & j181905.22 + 213234.0 & nvssj181905 + 213235 & 0.90(0.04 ) & 2.50(0.05 ) & 1.99(0.17 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j1820.6 + 3625 & j182023.61 + 362914.4 & & 1.04(0.04 ) & 2.61(0.05 ) & 2.36(0.17 ) & und & c & & ? & no + j1823.6 - 3453 & j182338.59 - 345412.0 & nvssj182338 - 345412 & 0.68(0.04 ) & 2.05(0.04 ) & 1.92(0.13 ) & bzb & b & m & ? & yes + j1823.8 + 4312 & j182352.33 + 431452.5 & & 1.12(0.04 ) & 2.96(0.05 ) & 2.50(0.13 ) & bzq & c & x & ? & no + j1825.1 - 5231 & j182513.79 - 523058.1 & sumssj182513 - 523057 & 1.65(0.03 ) & 2.86(0.03 ) & 2.26(0.07 ) & und & b & m & ? & yes + j1830.0 + 1325 & j183000.76 + 132414.4 & nvssj183000 + 132414 & 0.95(0.04 ) & 2.60(0.04 ) & 2.23(0.11 ) & und & c & m & ? & yes + j1830.2 - 4441 & j183000.86 - 444111.4 & sumssj183000 - 444112 & 1.17(0.04 ) & 3.10(0.05 ) & 2.37(0.10 ) & bzq & c & m & ? & yes + j1844.7 + 5716 & j184450.96 + 570938.6 & nvssj184451 + 570940 & 0.86(0.03 ) & 2.38(0.04 ) & 2.16(0.10 ) & bzb & b & m & ? & yes + j1936.9 + 8402 & j193930.23 + 835925.8 & & 1.08(0.04 ) & 2.97(0.05 ) & 2.43(0.14 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + j1940.8 - 6213 & j194121.76 - 621120.8 & sumssj194121 - 621120 & 1.30(0.04 ) & 2.88(0.04 ) & 2.36(0.09 ) & bzq & c & & ? & yes + j1942.8 + 1033 & j194247.48 + 103327.2 & nvssj194247 + 103327 & 0.72(0.03 ) & 2.06(0.03 ) & 1.85(0.07 ) & bzb & b & m & ? & yes + j1959.9 - 4727 & j195945.66 - 472519.2 & sumssj195945 - 472519 & 0.80(0.03 ) & 2.15(0.04 ) & 1.66(0.17 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j2040.2 - 7109 & j203931.44 - 711033.0 & & 1.12(0.04 ) & 3.01(0.05 ) & 2.71(0.12 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + j2049.8 + 1001 & j204932.28 + 095911.8 & & 1.23(0.06 ) & 3.13(0.10 ) & 2.68(0.23 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + j2103.6 - 6236 & j210338.38 - 623225.8 & sumssj210338 - 623226 & 0.81(0.03 ) & 2.30(0.03 ) & 1.80(0.12 ) & bzb & b & m & ? & yes + j2250.2 - 4205 & j225014.94 - 420218.6 & & 1.05(0.04 ) & 2.64(0.07 ) & 2.39(0.20 ) & und & c & & ? & no + & j225022.20 - 420613.2 & sumssj225022 - 420613 & 0.94(0.03 ) & 2.47(0.04 ) & 1.88(0.13 ) & bzb & c & m & 0.1187 ? & yes + j2317.3 - 4534 & j231731.97 - 453359.6 & sumssj231731 - 453400 & 0.70(0.04 ) & 2.19(0.08 ) & 1.92(0.34 ) & bzb & c & s , m,6 & ? & no + j2323.0 - 4918 & j232255.30 - 491942.0 & & 1.08(0.06 ) & 3.21(0.10 ) & 2.34(0.30 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + j2324.6 + 0801 & j232445.31 + 080206.3 & nvssj232445 + 080205 & 0.83(0.04 ) & 2.30(0.06 ) & 2.05(0.21 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + j2325.4 + 1650 & j232526.62 + 164941.1 & & 1.34(0.04 ) & 3.04(0.05 ) & 2.42(0.12 ) & bzq & c & & ? & no + & j232538.11 + 164642.8 & nvssj232538 + 164641 & 0.78(0.04 ) & 2.15(0.10 ) & 2.27(0.33 ) & bzb & c & m & ? & yes + + col . ( 1 ) 2fgl name . ( 2 ) _ wise _ name . ( 3 ) other name if present in literature and in the following order : roma - bzcat , nvss , sdss , at20 g , ned . ( 4,5,6 ) infrared colors from the _ wise _ all sky catalog corrected for galactic extinciton . values in parentheses are 1@xmath12 uncertainties ( 7 ) type of candidate according to our method : bzb - bzq - und ( undetermined ) . ( 8) class of candidate according to our method . ( 9 ) notes : n = nvss , f = first , s = sumss , a = at20 g , m = 2mass , s = sdss dr9 , 6 = 6dfgs , x = _ xmm - newton _ or _ chandra _ , x = rosat ; qso = quasar , sy = seyfert , lnr = liner , bl = bl lac ; v = variability in _ wise _ ( var_flag @xmath11 5 in at least one band ) ( 10 ) redshift : ( ? ) = unknown , ( number ? ) = uncertain . ( 11 ) re - association flag : `` yes '' if the association of our method corresponds to the one provided in the 2fgl , `` no '' otherwise . [ tab : agu2 ] 2fglj0032.7 - 5521 & 2fglj1117.2 - 5341 & 2fglj1722.5 - 0420 + 2fglj0048.8 - 6347 & 2fglj1120.0 - 2204 & 2fglj1730.6 - 2409 + 2fglj0212.1 + 5318 & 2fglj1129.0 - 0532 & 2fglj1744.1 - 7620 + 2fglj0224.0 + 6204 & 2fglj1208.5 - 6240 & 2fglj1747.6 + 0324 + 2fglj0239.5 + 1324 & 2fglj1221.4 - 0633 & 2fglj1748.8 + 3418 + 2fglj0248.5 + 5131 & 2fglj1231.3 - 5112 & 2fglj1748.9 - 3923 + 2fglj0305.0 - 1602 & 2fglj1240.6 - 7151 & 2fglj1753.8 - 4446 + 2fglj0307.4 + 4915 & 2fglj1306.2 - 6044 & 2fglj1757.5 - 6028 + 2fglj0318.0 + 0255 & 2fglj1312.9 - 2351 & 2fglj1759.4 - 2954 + 2fglj0336.0 + 7504 & 2fglj1335.3 - 4058 & 2fglj1820.6 - 3219 + 2fglj0338.2 + 1306 & 2fglj1353.5 - 6640 & 2fglj1821.8 + 0830 + 2fglj0353.2 + 5653 & 2fglj1400.7 - 1438 & 2fglj1828.7 + 3231 + 2fglj0359.5 + 5410 & 2fglj1410.4 + 7411 & 2fglj1830.9 - 3132 + 2fglj0409.5 + 0509 & 2fglj1417.7 - 5028 & 2fglj1902.7 - 7053 + 2fglj0418.9 + 6636 & 2fglj1423.9 - 7842 & 2fglj1906.5 + 0720 + 2fglj0420.9 - 3743 & 2fglj1424.2 - 1752 & 2fglj1919.5 - 7324 + 2fglj0426.7 + 5434 & 2fglj1458.5 - 2121 & 2fglj1946.7 - 1118 + 2fglj0438.0 - 7331 & 2fglj1507.0 - 6223 & 2fglj1947.8 - 0739 + 2fglj0439.8 - 1858 & 2fglj1513.5 - 2546 & 2fglj2002.8 - 2150 + 2fglj0516.7 + 2634 & 2fglj1513.9 - 2256 & 2fglj2017.5 - 1618 + 2fglj0523.3 - 2530 & 2fglj1518.4 - 5233 & 2fglj2018.0 + 3626 + 2fglj0524.1 + 2843 & 2fglj1536.4 - 4949 & 2fglj2034.7 - 4201 + 2fglj0533.9 + 6759 & 2fglj1539.2 - 3325 & 2fglj2034.9 + 3632 + 2fglj0539.3 - 0323 & 2fglj1544.5 - 1126 & 2fglj2041.2 + 4735 + 2fglj0605.3 + 3758 & 2fglj1548.3 + 1453 & 2fglj2042.8 - 7317 + 2fglj0658.4 + 0633 & 2fglj1601.1 - 4220 & 2fglj2046.2 - 4259 + 2fglj0719.2 - 5000 & 2fglj1617.3 - 5336 & 2fglj2103.5 - 1112 + 2fglj0758.8 - 1448 & 2fglj1617.5 - 2657 & 2fglj2107.8 + 3652 + 2fglj0803.2 - 0339 & 2fglj1622.8 - 5006 & 2fglj2110.3 + 3822 + 2fglj0843.6 + 6715 & 2fglj1624.1 - 4040 & 2fglj2112.5 - 3042 + 2fglj0854.7 - 4501 & 2fglj1626.4 - 4408 & 2fglj2115.4 + 1213 + 2fglj0859.4 - 2532 & 2fglj1631.6 - 2819 & 2fglj2117.5 + 3730 + 2fglj0934.0 - 6231 & 2fglj1646.7 - 1333 & 2fglj2212.6 + 0702 + 2fglj0952.7 - 3717 & 2fglj1649.2 - 3004 & 2fglj2246.3 + 1549 + 2fglj1016.4 - 4244 & 2fglj1704.3 + 1235 & 2fglj2249.1 + 5758 + 2fglj1033.5 - 5032 & 2fglj1704.6 - 0529 & 2fglj2339.6 - 0532 + 2fglj1036.1 - 6722 & 2fglj1709.0 - 0821 & 2fglj2351.6 - 7558 + [ tab : dm ] among the whole sample of 590 ugss analyzed , 299 without and 291 with @xmath1-ray analysis flag there are 28 sources having at least one @xmath1-ray blazar candidate that were also unidentified in the first fermi @xmath1-ray lat catalog ( 1fgl ; * ? ? ? * ) and they were analyzed using two different statistical approaches : the classification tree and the logistic regression analyses ( see * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . for these 28 ugss , analyzed on the basis of the above statistical approaches , we performed a comparison with our results to verify if the 2fgl sources that we associated with a @xmath1-ray blazar candidates have been also classified as agns . by comparing the results of our association method with those in ackermann et al . ( 2012 ) , we found that 23 out of 28 ugss that we associate with @xmath1-ray blazar candidates are classified as agns , all of them with a probability higher than 66% and 12 of them higher than 80% ( see * ? ? ? * ) . among the remaining 5 sources , 4 have been classified as pulsars , with a very low probability with respect to the whole sample , systematically lower than 56% . in addition , there is one with an ambiguous classification . consequently , we emphasize that for the subamples where we overlap our results are in good agreement with the classification suggested by ackermann et al . ( 2012 ) , consistent with the @xmath1-ray blazar nature of the _ wise _ candidates proposed in our analysis . a new association method has been recently developed on the basis of the striking discovery that @xmath1-ray emitting blazars occupy a distinct region in the _ wise _ 3-dimensional color space , well separated from that occupied by other extragalactic and galactic sources @xcite . according to dabrusco et al . ( 2013 ) the 3-dimensional region occupied by @xmath1-ray emitting blazars is the @xmath2 ; its 2-dimensional projection in the [ 3.4]-[4.6]-[12 ] @xmath3 m parameter space , retains its historical definition of _ wise _ gamma - ray strip @xcite . additional improvements , mostly based on the _ wise _ all - sky data release , available since march 2012 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , and on a new parametrization of the @xmath2 in the parameter space of its principal components have been subsequently developed @xcite . in this work we describe the results obtained by applying our new association procedure to the search for new @xmath1-ray blazar candidates in the two samples : the unidentified gamma - ray sources ( ugss ) , and the active galaxies of uncertain type ( agus ) , as listed in the 2fgl @xcite . we present the complete list of @xmath1-ray blazar candidates found using the _ wise _ observations . we also perform an extensive archival search to see if the sources associated with our method , show additional blazar - like characteristics ; as for example the presence of a radio counterpart and/or of a spectrum that could be featureless as for bzbs or similar to those of broad - line quasars as generally occurs in bzqs . we found 62 @xmath1-ray blazar candidates for the ugs without any @xmath1-ray analysis flag and 49 for those with @xmath1-ray analysis flag , out of a total of 590 sources investigated . for the agus sample , we confirmed the blazar - like nature of 87 out 210 of agus analyzed on the basis of their ir colors . a significant fraction ( i.e. , @xmath0 36% ) of the _ wise _ sources associated with our method with ugss have a radio counterpart , more than 50% are also detected in the 2mass catalog as generally occurs for blazars , and more than @xmath010% appear to be variable according to the _ wise _ analysis flags @xcite . notably , all the sources for which an optical spectrum was available in literature clearly show blazar - like features , being either featureless or having broad emission lines typical of quasars , the only exception being sdss j015910.05 + 010514.5 , one of the counterparts associated with 2fglj0158.4 + 0107 . as generally expected for @xmath1-ray blazars a handful of the selected candidates are also detected in the x - rays . a deeper investigation of their x - ray counterparts will be addressed in a forthcoming paper @xcite . all the @xmath1-ray blazar candidates selected with our association procedure appear to be extragalactic in nature ; moreover our selection seems not to be highly contaminated by any class of non - blazar - like sources , as for example obscured quasars or seyfert galaxies . our results are in good agreement with those based on different statistical approaches like the classification tree and the logistic regression analyses @xcite . in particular , 23 out of 28 ugss that we associate to a @xmath1-ray blazar candidate are also classified as active galaxies by the above methods at high level of confidence . for ugss associated with a pulsar in the 2fgl analysis as reported in the public list of lat - detected gamma - ray pulsars ( see section [ sec : ugs ] ) , we did not find any _ wise _ @xmath1-ray blazar candidate , confirming the reliability of our selection procedure . we provide a list of the ugss for which we did not find any @xmath1-ray blazar candidates using either the new improved method or the old parametrization ( i.e. , less conservative ) , within their positional uncertainty regions at 95% level of confidence . this list of _ fermi _ sources reported in table [ tab : dm ] could be useful for follow up observations aiming at discover new pulsars or to constrain exotic high - energy physics phenomena such as dark matter signatures , or new classes of sources ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? finally , we emphasize that additional investigations of different samples of active galactic nuclei , such as seyfert galaxies , are necessary to study the problem of the contamination of our association method by extragalactic sources with infrared colors similar to those of @xmath1-ray blazars . moreover extensive ground - based spectroscopic follow up observations in the optical and in the near ir would be ideal to verify the nature of the selected _ wise _ sources and to estimate the fraction of non - blazar objects , similar to the recent studies performed for the unidentified integral sources ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . _ note added to the proofs : _ the infrared source wise j182352.33 + 431452.5 , potential counterpart of 2fgl j1823.8 + 4312 , is a possible contaminant of our selections given its optical spectrum typical of an obscured red quasar ( d. stern priv . comm . ) . we thank the anonymous referee for useful comments that led to improvements in the paper . f. massaro is grateful to s. digel and d. thompson for their helpful discussions and to m. ajello , e. ferrara and j. ballet for their support . the work is supported by the nasa grants nnx12ao97 g . r. dabrusco gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the us virtual astronomical observatory , which is sponsored by the national science foundation and the national aeronautics and space administration . the work by g. tosti is supported by the asi / inaf contract i/005/12/0 . h. a. smith acknowledges partial support from nasa / jpl grant rsa 1369566 . topcat[multiblock footnote omitted ] @xcite and saoimage ds9 were used extensively in this work for the preparation and manipulation of the tabular data and the images . part of this work is based on archival data , software or on - line services provided by the asi science data center . this research has made use of data obtained from the high energy astrophysics science archive research center ( heasarc ) provided by nasa s goddard space flight center ; the simbad database operated at cds , strasbourg , france ; the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology , under contract with the national aeronautics and space administration . part of this work is based on the nvss ( nrao vla sky survey ) ; the national radio astronomy observatory is operated by associated universities , inc . , under contract with the national science foundation . this publication makes use of data products from the two micron all sky survey , which is a joint project of the university of massachusetts and the infrared processing and analysis center / california institute of technology , funded by the national aeronautics and space administration and the national science foundation . this publication makes use of data products from the wide - field infrared survey explorer , which is a joint project of the university of california , los angeles , and the jet propulsion laboratory / california institute of technology , funded by the national aeronautics and space administration . funding for the sdss and sdss - ii has been provided by the alfred p. sloan foundation , the participating institutions , the national science foundation , the u.s . department of energy , the national aeronautics and space administration , the japanese monbukagakusho , the max planck society , and the higher education funding council for england . the sdss web site is http://www.sdss.org/. the sdss is managed by the astrophysical research consortium for the participating institutions . the participating institutions are the american museum of natural history , astrophysical institute potsdam , university of basel , university of cambridge , case western reserve university , university of chicago , drexel university , fermilab , the institute for advanced study , the japan participation group , johns hopkins university , the joint institute for nuclear astrophysics , the kavli institute for particle astrophysics and cosmology , the korean scientist group , the chinese academy of sciences ( lamost ) , los alamos national laboratory , the max - planck - institute for astronomy ( mpia ) , the max - planck - institute for astrophysics ( mpa ) , new mexico state university , ohio state university , university of pittsburgh , university of portsmouth , princeton university , the united states naval observatory , and the university of washington . abdo , a. a. , et al . 2009 , astroparticle physics , 32 , 193 abdo , a. a. et al . 2010 apjs 188 405 ackermann , m. et al . 2011 apj , 743 , 171 ackermann , m. et al . 2012 apj , 753 , 83 adelman - mccarthy , j. , agueros , m.a . , allam , s.s . , et al . 2008 , apjs , 175 , 297 becker , r. h. , white , r. l. , helfand , d. j.1995 apj , 450 , 559 bauer , a. et al . 2009 apj , 705 , 46 chen , p. s. , fu , h. w. & gao , y. f. 2005 newa , 11 , 27 comastri , a. , mignoli , m. , ciliegi , p. , et al . 2002 , apj , 571 , 771 condon , j. j. , cotton , w. d. , greisen , e. w. , yin , q. f. , perley , r. a. , taylor , g. b. , & broderick , j. j. 1998 , aj , 115 , 1693 cutri et al . 2012 wise.rept , 1c dabrusco , r. , massaro , f. , ajello , m. , grindlay , j. e. , smith , howard a. & tosti , g. 2012 apj , 748 , 68 dabrusco , r. , massaro , f. , paggi , a. , masetti , n. , giroletti , m. , tosti , g. , smith , howard , a. 2013 apjs submitted draine , b. t. 2003 , ara&a , 41 , 241 evans , i. n. et al . 2010 apjs , 189 , 37 falco , e. e. et al . 1998 apj , 494 , 47 giommi , p. et al . 2005 , a&a , 434 , 385 hartman , r.c . et al . , 1999 apjs 123 healey , s. e. et al . 2007 apjs , 171 , 61 hu , c. et al . 2008 , 687 , 78 jolliffe i.t . principal component analysis , series : springer series in statistics " , 2nd ed . , springer , ny , 2002 , xxix , 487 , 28 jones , h. d. et al . 2004 mnras , 355 , 747 jones , h. d. et al . 2009 mnras , 399 , 683 mirabal , n. 2009 [ arxiv.org/abs/0908.1389v2 ] mirabal , n. 2009 apj , 701 , 129 mirabal , nieto , d. & pardo , s. 2010 a&a submitted , [ arxiv.org/abs/1007.2644v2 ] maselli , a. , massaro , e. , nesci , r. , sclavi , s. , rossi , c. , giommi , p. 2010 a&a , 512a , 74 maselli , a. , cusumano , g. , massaro , e. , la parola , v. , segreto , a. , sbarufatti , b. 2010 a&a , 520a , 47 masetti , n. et al . 2008 a&a , 482 , 113 masetti , n. et al . 2009 a&a , 495 , 121 masetti , n. et al . 2010 a&a , 519a , 96 masetti , n. et al . 2012 a&a , 538a , 123 massaro , e. , giommi , p. , leto , c. , marchegiani , p. , maselli , a. , perri , m. , piranomonte , s. , sclavi , s. 2009 a&a , 495 , 691 massaro , e. , giommi , p. , leto , c. , marchegiani , p. , maselli , a. , perri , m. , piranomonte , s. , sclavi , s. 2010 http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.0922 massaro , e. , giommi , p. , leto , c. , marchegiani , p. , maselli , a. , perri , m. , piranomonte , s. , 2011 multifrequency catalogue of blazars ( 3rd edition ) " , aracne editrice , rome , italy massaro , f. , dabrusco , r. , ajello , m. , grindlay , j. e. & smith , h. a. 2011b apj , 740l , 48 massaro , f. , dabrusco , r. , tosti , g. , ajello , m. , gasparrini , d. , grindlay , j. e. & smith , howard a. 2012a apj , 750 , 138 massaro , f. , dabrusco , r. , tosti , g. , ajello , m. , paggi , a. , gasparrini , 2012b apj , 752 , 61 massaro , f. , dabrusco , r. , paggi , a. , tosti , g. , gasparrini , d. 2012c apj , 750l , 35 massaro , f. , paggi , a. , dabrusco , r. , tosti , g. , grindlay , j. e. , smith , howard a. , digel , s. w. , funk , s. 2012d apj , 757l , 27 mauch , t. , murphy , t. , buttery , h. j. , curran , j. , hunstead , r. w. , piestrzynski , b. , robertson , j. g. , sadler , e. m. 2003 mnras , 342 , 1117 monet , d. g. et al . 2003 aj , 125 , 984 murphy , t. et al . 2010 mnras , 402 , 2403 mukherjee , r. et al . , 1997 apj , 490 , 116 nolan et al . 2012 apjs , 199 , 31 paggi , a. , massaro , f. , dabrusco , r. et al . 2013 apjs in prep . paris , i. et al . 2012 a&a , 548a , 66 pearson , k. 1901 philosophical magazine 2 , 559 . schneider et al . 2007 , aj , 134 , 102 stickel , m. , padovani , p. , urry , c. m. , fried , j. w. , kuehr , h. 1991 apj , 374 , 431 stocke et al . 1991 , apjs , 76 , 813 skrutskie , m. f. et al . 2006 , aj , 131 , 1163 su , m. & finkbeiner , d. p. 2012 apj submitted http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7060v1 urry , c. m. , & padovani , p. 1995 , pasp , 107 , 803 thompson , d. j. 2008 rpph , 71k6901 taylor , m. b. 2005 , asp conf . ser . , 347 , 29 voges , w. et al . 1999 a&a , 349 , 389 white , r. l. , becker , r. h. helfand , d. j. , gregg , m. d. et al . 1997 apj , 475 , 479 white , g. l. et al . 1988 apj , 327 , 561 wright , e. l. , et al . 2010 aj , 140 , 1868 zechlin , h .- s . , fernandes , m. v. , elsasser , d. , horns , d. 2012 a&a , 538a , 93 in tables [ tab : ugs_usno ] , [ tab : ugf_usno ] , [ tab : agu_usno1 ] and [ tab : agu_usno2 ] , we report the magnitudes of the optical counterpart uniquely found within 3.3 , for all the @xmath1-ray blazar candidates , selected according to our association procedure . this information permits us to optimize the strategy for the future follow up optical observations needed to clarify the nature of the selected sources and to determine their redshifts via spectroscopy . name & name & mag & mag & mag & mag & mag + j0039.1 + 4331 & j003858.27 + 432947.0 & 19.29 & 19.26 & 19.03 & 18.84 & 18.32 + j0116.6 - 6153 & j011619.59 - 615343.5 & & 17.72 & 18.22 & 17.78 & 17.91 + j0133.4 - 4408 & j013306.35 - 441421.3 & & 18.38 & 19.70 & 18.12 & 18.76 + j0133.4 - 4408 & j013321.36 - 441319.4 & & 18.63 & 19.39 & 18.32 & 18.80 + j0143.6 - 5844 & j014347.39 - 584551.3 & & 16.70 & 18.48 & 16.64 & 17.04 + j0158.4 + 0107 & j015910.05 + 010514.7 & 17.94 & 18.27 & 17.71 & 18.43 & 16.33 + j0158.4 + 0107 & j015757.45 + 011547.8 & 21.13 & 19.39 & & 19.31 & 18.58 + j0158.4 + 0107 & j015836.25 + 010632.1 & 19.22 & 18.90 & 19.02 & 19.07 & 17.62 + j0158.6 + 8558 & j014935.30 + 860115.3 & 18.79 & 17.14 & 18.60 & 16.96 & 15.92 + j0158.6 + 8558 & j015550.16 + 854745.1 & 19.83 & 19.27 & 19.95 & 18.90 & 17.78 + j0227.7 + 2249 & j022744.35 + 224834.3 & & & 20.82 & 20.22 & 19.28 + j0316.1 - 6434 & j031614.31 - 643731.4 & & 16.59 & 18.19 & 16.57 & 16.82 + j0332.1 + 6309 & j033153.90 + 630814.1 & & & 20.66 & 19.92 & 18.35 + j0409.8 - 0357 & j040946.57 - 040003.4 & 19.45 & 19.18 & 17.53 & 16.98 & 16.86 + j0414.9 - 0855 & j041457.01 - 085652.0 & 20.48 & 18.15 & 20.21 & 17.31 & 17.69 + j0416.0 - 4355 & j041605.81 - 435514.6 & & 18.49 & 18.70 & 18.17 & 18.00 + j0555.9 - 4348 & j055618.74 - 435146.1 & & 19.23 & 18.88 & 19.08 & 18.08 + j0555.9 - 4348 & j055531.59 - 435030.7 & & 19.16 & 19.22 & 18.93 & 18.19 + j0602.7 - 4011 & j060237.10 - 401453.2 & & 17.61 & 17.76 & 17.74 & 17.62 + j0644.6 + 6034 & j064459.38 + 603131.7 & 19.44 & 19.03 & 19.33 & 18.23 & 18.28 + j0713.5 - 0952 & j071223.28 - 094536.3 & & & 19.48 & 17.88 & 17.24 + j0723.9 + 2901 & j072354.83 + 285929.9 & 19.78 & 19.05 & 19.97 & 18.72 & + j0744.1 - 2523 & j074402.19 - 252146.0 & & 13.33 & & 9.510 & + j0746.0 - 0222 & j074627.03 - 022549.3 & 19.03 & & 18.59 & 18.43 & 16.53 + j0756.3 - 6433 & j075624.60 - 643030.6 & & 18.80 & 19.13 & 17.26 & 18.56 + j0807.0 - 6511 & j080729.66 - 650910.3 & & 18.97 & 19.15 & 19.89 & + j0838.8 - 2828 & j083842.77 - 282830.9 & 19.66 & & 18.49 & 19.02 & 18.01 + j0841.3 - 3556 & j084121.63 - 355505.9 & & 17.20 & 17.57 & 16.72 & 16.64 + j0844.9 + 6214 & j084406.81 + 621458.6 & 19.39 & 16.38 & 18.75 & 16.62 & 15.85 + j0858.3 - 4333 & j085839.22 - 432642.7 & & 20.10 & & 20.12 & 17.83 + j0900.9 + 6736 & j090121.65 + 673955.8 & 19.09 & 18.52 & 19.61 & 18.25 & 18.13 + j0955.0 - 3949 & j095458.30 - 394655.0 & & 16.66 & 18.15 & 17.21 & 17.11 + j1013.6 + 3434 & j101256.54 + 343648.8 & 20.22 & 18.60 & 20.44 & 17.99 & 17.39 + j1016.1 + 5600 & j101544.44 + 555100.7 & 19.69 & 19.42 & 20.61 & 19.35 & + j1029.5 - 2022 & j102946.66 - 201812.6 & 18.01 & 18.22 & 18.41 & 18.25 & 18.37 + j1032.9 - 8401 & j103015.35 - 840308.7 & & 19.36 & 19.26 & 18.84 & 18.03 + j1038.2 - 2423 & j103754.92 - 242544.5 & 20.58 & 18.21 & 20.56 & 18.53 & 18.09 + j1207.3 - 5055 & j120746.43 - 505948.6 & & & 20.50 & 20.07 & + & j120750.50 - 510314.9 & & 19.12 & 19.71 & 20.27 & + j1254.2 - 2203 & j125422.47 - 220413.6 & & 19.88 & 18.67 & 19.11 & 18.22 + j1259.8 - 3749 & j125949.80 - 374858.1 & & 17.44 & 18.07 & 16.78 & 17.35 + j1340.5 - 0412 & j134042.02 - 041006.8 & 18.21 & 17.21 & 17.59 & 16.46 & 17.08 + j1346.0 - 2605 & j134621.08 - 255642.3 & 19.82 & 19.25 & 19.13 & 18.77 & 18.39 + j1347.0 - 2956 & j134706.89 - 295842.3 & 17.85 & 17.09 & 18.80 & 17.14 & 17.09 + j1404.0 - 5244 & j140313.11 - 524839.5 & & 17.49 & 18.92 & 18.57 & + j1517.2 + 3645 & j151649.26 + 365022.9 & 20.90 & & 21.49 & 20.07 & 19.16 + j1612.0 + 1403 & j161118.10 + 140328.9 & 18.39 & 18.39 & 19.06 & 19.16 & 18.43 + j1614.8 + 4703 & j161541.22 + 471111.8 & 17.55 & 16.03 & 16.90 & 15.39 & 15.51 + & j161434.67 + 470420.1 & 15.62 & 15.76 & 16.28 & 16.13 & 15.14 + & j161513.04 + 471355.2 & & 20.02 & 21.44 & 20.29 & 19.09 + & j161450.96 + 465953.7 & & 19.19 & 21.66 & 19.60 & 19.10 + j1622.8 - 0314 & j162225.35 - 031439.6 & & 19.85 & & 19.41 & + j1627.8 + 3219 & j162800.40 + 322414.0 & 20.65 & 19.50 & 19.02 & 18.88 & 19.01 + j1647.0 + 4351 & j164619.95 + 435631.0 & 20.43 & 19.73 & 20.42 & 19.67 & + j1730.6 - 0353 & j173052.86 - 035247.1 & 18.31 & 17.40 & 19.30 & 17.33 & 16.73 + j1745.6 + 0203 & j174526.95 + 020532.7 & 18.71 & 17.12 & 18.06 & 17.28 & 17.16 + & j174507.82 + 015442.5 & 19.21 & 16.40 & 18.11 & 16.30 & 15.98 + j1759.2 - 3853 & j175903.29 - 384739.5 & & 17.95 & 18.95 & & + j1842.3 + 2740 & j184201.25 + 274239.2 & 20.18 & 19.04 & 19.34 & 19.18 & 18.75 + j1904.8 - 0705 & j190444.57 - 070740.1 & & 19.73 & 19.87 & 18.45 & + j1924.9 - 1036 & j192501.63 - 104316.3 & & 18.63 & 19.42 & 18.04 & 17.75 + j2004.6 + 7004 & j200506.02 + 700439.3 & 20.73 & 19.25 & 19.24 & 18.65 & + j2021.5 + 0632 & j202155.45 + 062913.7 & 17.27 & 16.13 & 17.01 & 16.67 & 16.03 + & j202154.66 + 062908.7 & 19.15 & 17.44 & 17.81 & 17.24 & 17.35 + j2133.9 + 6645 & j213349.21 + 664704.3 & & & & 19.37 & 18.80 + j2134.6 - 2130 & j213430.18 - 213032.6 & 19.77 & 18.65 & 18.96 & 16.80 & 17.70 + j2300.0 - 3553 & j230010.16 - 360159.9 & & 18.43 & 19.23 & 18.17 & 17.63 + j2319.3 - 3830 & j232000.11 - 383511.4 & & 19.24 & 19.86 & 18.92 & 18.48 + j2358.4 - 1811 & j235828.61 - 181526.6 & 18.73 & 18.83 & 18.54 & 18.33 & 18.34 + name & name & mag & mag & mag & mag & mag + j0233.9 + 6238c & j023238.07 + 623651.9 & & & 20.95 & & 18.70 + & j023418.09 + 624207.8 & & & & 19.34 & 17.89 + j0341.8 + 3148c & j034158.52 + 314855.7 & 18.76 & 14.98 & 17.64 & 14.86 & 13.62 + & j034204.35 + 314711.4 & & 19.84 & & 19.86 & 17.33 + j0440.5 + 2554c & j043947.48 + 260140.5 & & 19.09 & & 19.11 & 15.70 + j0620.8 - 2556 & j062108.68 - 255757.9 & 19.78 & & 19.94 & 19.22 & + j0631.7 + 0428 & j063104.12 + 042012.6 & & 20.31 & & 20.36 & + j0637.0 + 0416c & j063647.19 + 042058.7 & 20.25 & 17.34 & 20.42 & 17.61 & 16.47 + & j063703.09 + 042146.1 & 18.95 & 16.95 & 19.88 & 17.23 & 16.04 + & j063705.96 + 042537.2 & 21.00 & 18.79 & 20.37 & 17.45 & 16.87 + & j063701.93 + 042037.2 & 21.00 & & 18.57 & & + j0922.2 - 5214c & j092154.24 - 521236.1 & & & 19.57 & 18.86 & 17.49 + j1059.9 - 2051 & j110025.72 - 205333.4 & 18.44 & 16.57 & 18.08 & 16.62 & 16.64 + j1208.6 - 2257 & j120816.33 - 224921.9 & 18.29 & 18.04 & 21.52 & 18.12 & 18.43 + j1255.8 - 5828 & j125459.44 - 582009.5 & & 16.56 & 18.67 & 16.71 & 16.33 + j1315.6 - 0730 & j131543.62 - 073659.0 & 19.88 & 19.09 & 18.21 & 17.95 & 18.06 + j1315.6 - 0730 & j131552.98 - 073301.9 & 19.78 & 18.68 & 18.75 & 17.75 & 17.56 + j1324.4 - 5411 & j132415.49 - 541104.4 & & 18.15 & & 18.86 & + j1345.8 - 3356 & j134543.05 - 335643.3 & & 17.98 & 19.58 & 18.65 & 18.12 + j1407.4 - 2948 & j140818.86 - 294203.2 & & & 20.80 & 19.36 & 18.75 + j1624.2 - 2124 & j162343.89 - 210707.0 & 19.70 & 18.57 & 19.35 & 18.74 & 18.51 + j1835.4 + 1036 & j183551.92 + 103056.8 & 18.37 & 16.97 & 17.97 & 16.73 & 16.30 + j1835.4 + 1349 & j183522.00 + 135733.9 & 19.69 & 18.29 & 19.36 & 18.15 & 17.24 + & j183535.34 + 134848.8 & 19.57 & 17.15 & 19.01 & 16.66 & 16.84 + j1837.9 + 3821 & j183656.31 + 382232.8 & 18.37 & 18.01 & 19.53 & 18.45 & 18.34 + & j183828.80 + 382704.3 & 20.75 & & 20.96 & 20.60 & + & j183837.16 + 381900.5 & 21.01 & 19.40 & 19.23 & 19.01 & 18.76 + j1844.3 + 1548 & j184425.36 + 154645.9 & 18.90 & 18.17 & 18.45 & 17.15 & 16.00 + j1844.9 - 1116 & j184456.29 - 111352.1 & & 18.29 & & & 13.34 + j1958.6 + 4020 & j195842.28 + 401125.8 & 18.81 & & 19.05 & & + j2124.0 - 1513 & j212423.63 - 152558.2 & 20.18 & 19.41 & 20.33 & 18.87 & 18.59 + j2128.7 + 5824 & j212900.37 + 583128.0 & 20.28 & 18.42 & 19.96 & 18.28 & 17.71 + name & name & mag & mag & mag & mag & mag + j0009.1 + 5030 & j000922.76 + 503028.8 & & & 19.74 & 19.35 & 17.32 + j0018.8 - 8154 & j001920.58 - 815251.3 & & 15.86 & 16.62 & 16.13 & 15.33 + j0022.2 - 1853 & j002209.25 - 185334.7 & 19.05 & 18.63 & 18.07 & 16.95 & 17.29 + j0022.3 - 5141 & j002200.08 - 514024.2 & & 15.65 & 17.38 & 15.94 & 16.65 + j0045.5 + 1218 & j004543.33 + 121712.0 & 18.22 & 17.40 & 18.75 & 16.91 & 15.66 + j0051.4 - 6241 & j005116.62 - 624204.3 & & 16.95 & 16.83 & 16.69 & 15.78 + j0059.7 - 5700 & j005846.56 - 565911.4 & & 17.45 & 17.39 & 16.95 & 17.07 + j0110.3 + 6805 & j011012.84 + 680541.1 & 18.66 & 16.51 & 18.14 & 16.33 & 15.37 + j0134.4 + 2636 & j013428.19 + 263843.0 & 16.87 & 16.74 & 17.09 & 15.91 & 15.55 + j0156.4 + 3909 & j015631.40 + 391430.9 & 17.99 & 18.05 & 18.71 & 19.03 & 18.25 + j0156.5 - 2419 & j015606.46 - 241754.3 & 21.01 & & 20.86 & 21.40 & + j0207.9 - 6832 & j020750.91 - 683755.1 & & 17.62 & 20.02 & 19.05 & 18.21 + j0210.7 - 5102 & j021046.19 - 510101.8 & & 14.85 & 17.39 & 14.82 & 15.13 + j0238.2 - 3905 & j023749.42 - 390050.3 & & 16.86 & 18.04 & 16.94 & 17.81 + & j023800.62 - 390504.6 & & 17.52 & 17.63 & 16.59 & 16.96 + j0248.6 + 8440 & j024948.30 + 843556.9 & 19.50 & 18.43 & 19.42 & 17.62 & 17.01 + j0253.4 + 3218 & j025333.64 + 321720.8 & & 19.83 & 20.39 & 19.69 & 19.46 + j0309.3 - 0743 & j030943.23 - 074427.4 & 18.33 & 15.96 & 18.16 & 16.01 & 16.71 + j0332.5 - 1118 & j033200.72 - 111456.1 & 17.78 & 17.08 & 18.85 & 17.75 & 18.30 + & j033223.25 - 111950.6 & 19.41 & 17.66 & 18.90 & 16.71 & 18.00 + j0333.7 + 2918 & j033349.00 + 291631.6 & 17.49 & 17.24 & 19.11 & 16.44 & 15.73 + j0334.3 + 6538 & j033356.74 + 653656.0 & & 18.93 & 19.70 & 17.66 & 17.01 + j0424.3 - 5332 & j042347.22 - 533026.6 & & 17.22 & 18.21 & 16.50 & 17.42 + & j042504.26 - 533158.3 & & 15.54 & 17.41 & 16.14 & 16.18 + j0433.9 - 5726 & j043344.12 - 572613.3 & & 17.73 & 18.90 & 17.78 & 18.67 + j0438.8 - 4521 & j043900.84 - 452222.6 & & 18.37 & 20.85 & 19.48 & + j0456.5 + 2658 & j045617.36 + 270221.1 & 20.42 & & 21.50 & & 18.68 + j0505.9 + 6116 & j050558.78 + 611335.9 & & 18.71 & 20.73 & 18.67 & 17.30 + j0506.7 - 5435 & j050657.80 - 543503.9 & & 15.95 & 16.73 & 16.91 & 16.25 + j0508.1 - 1936 & j050805.75 - 194721.6 & 17.57 & 17.51 & 19.44 & 18.22 & 18.09 + j0512.9 + 4040 & j051252.53 + 404143.7 & 16.46 & 15.11 & 16.39 & 15.35 & 14.83 + j0525.5 - 6011 & j052537.74 - 601732.0 & & 20.58 & & 20.86 & + j0532.0 - 4826 & j053158.61 - 482736.0 & & & 20.61 & & 18.98 + j0537.7 - 5716 & j053748.95 - 571830.2 & & 17.23 & 18.07 & 17.17 & 17.83 + j0609.4 - 0248 & j060915.06 - 024754.6 & 18.05 & 17.47 & 18.23 & 16.92 & 16.47 + j0621.9 + 3750 & j062157.63 + 375057.0 & 20.30 & & 20.29 & 19.96 & 18.63 + j0644.2 - 6713 & j064428.06 - 671257.3 & & & 20.47 & 20.87 & + j0647.8 - 6102 & j064806.55 - 610507.4 & & 18.75 & 18.89 & 19.26 & 18.05 + j0653.7 + 2818 & j065344.26 + 281547.5 & 19.15 & 18.26 & 18.12 & 17.54 & 17.72 + j0700.3 + 1710 & j070001.50 + 170921.8 & 18.29 & 18.08 & 18.55 & 16.02 & 17.10 + j0700.3 + 1710 & j070046.29 + 171019.8 & 18.32 & 17.18 & 17.29 & 17.23 & 16.70 + j0703.1 - 3912 & j070312.64 - 391418.9 & & 16.41 & 17.06 & 17.18 & 17.93 + j0706.5 + 7741 & j070651.32 + 774137.0 & 17.44 & 17.53 & 17.44 & 18.00 & 16.36 + j0706.7 - 4845 & j070549.12 - 483911.4 & & 18.96 & 19.14 & 18.53 & 18.10 + j0709.3 - 0256 & j070945.05 - 025517.4 & & & 19.61 & 19.29 & + j0726.0 - 0053 & j072550.63 - 005456.4 & 17.63 & 16.58 & 17.41 & 15.82 & 15.91 + j0734.2 - 7706 & j073443.44 - 771113.4 & & 19.76 & & 20.77 & + j0746.5 - 0713 & j074627.48 - 070949.7 & 19.73 & 18.81 & 19.64 & 19.52 & 17.37 + j0746.5 - 4758 & j074642.30 - 475455.2 & & 16.58 & 18.18 & 16.99 & 15.85 + j0816.7 - 2420 & j081639.46 - 242635.4 & 18.00 & & 18.26 & 18.06 & 16.14 + & j081640.41 - 242106.6 & 19.42 & & 20.70 & & + j0823.0 + 4041 & j082257.55 + 404149.8 & 19.00 & 18.7 & 19.34 & 19.47 & 18.16 + j0844.8 - 5459 & j084502.47 - 545808.5 & & & 19.35 & 16.80 & 17.65 + j0849.9 - 3540 & j084945.61 - 354101.2 & & 19.03 & 20.27 & 18.45 & + j0852.4 - 5756 & j085238.73 - 575529.4 & & 18.99 & 18.70 & 19.08 & 18.22 + j0855.1 - 0712 & j085435.20 - 071837.5 & 16.39 & 16.26 & 16.07 & 15.93 & 15.29 + j0856.0 + 7136 & j085654.85 + 714623.8 & 19.79 & 19.05 & & 19.75 & 17.29 + j0858.1 - 1952 & j085805.36 - 195036.8 & 19.19 & 18.54 & 18.63 & 18.93 & 17.76 + j0904.8 - 3513 & j090423.42 - 351203.0 & & 18.27 & 20.10 & 18.26 & + j0906.2 - 0906 & j090618.05 - 090544.9 & 19.06 & 19.13 & 19.07 & 18.59 & 18.04 + j0919.3 - 2203 & j092002.74 - 215835.0 & 18.55 & 17.99 & 19.26 & 19.24 & 18.12 + j0940.8 - 6105 & j094047.33 - 610728.5 & & 16.51 & 18.03 & 16.68 & 16.29 + j0941.9 - 0755 & j094221.46 - 075953.1 & 19.82 & 18.84 & 17.66 & 17.91 & 18.08 + j0946.9 - 2541 & j094709.52 - 254100.0 & 16.68 & 16.80 & 18.16 & 16.71 & 16.62 + j1016.2 - 0638 & j101542.96 - 063055.1 & 19.24 & & 19.94 & 19.70 & + j1016.2 - 0638 & j101626.98 - 063625.2 & 19.98 & & 19.81 & 18.86 & 18.07 + j1045.5 - 2931 & j104540.62 - 292726.4 & 19.30 & 19.06 & 18.77 & 19.17 & 18.64 + j1103.9 - 5356 & j110352.22 - 535700.7 & & 16.12 & 17.82 & 16.42 & 16.02 + j1106.3 - 3643 & j110624.04 - 364659.0 & & 18.71 & 19.65 & 19.20 & 18.37 + j1154.1 - 3242 & j115406.16 - 324243.0 & & 17.96 & 19.06 & 19.00 & 17.94 + j1230.2 - 5258 & j122939.88 - 530332.1 & & 16.62 & 18.03 & 17.41 & 16.72 + j1238.1 - 1953 & j123824.40 - 195913.4 & 18.03 & 17.48 & 17.66 & 17.01 & 17.97 + j1239.5 + 0728 & j123924.58 + 073017.2 & 19.07 & 17.76 & 19.34 & 17.92 & 17.96 + name & name & mag & mag & mag & mag & mag + j1301.6 + 3331 & j130147.03 + 332236.3 & 19.82 & 20.04 & 20.33 & 19.38 & 18.92 + j1303.8 - 5537 & j130349.23 - 554031.6 & & 16.82 & & 17.92 & 17.63 + j1304.1 - 2415 & j130416.70 - 241216.6 & 17.10 & 16.56 & 19.94 & 18.16 & 16.60 + j1304.3 - 4353 & j130421.01 - 435310.2 & & 15.75 & 17.48 & 16.10 & 15.48 + j1307.5 - 4300 & j130737.98 - 425938.9 & & 15.75 & 16.26 & 15.58 & 14.98 + j1307.6 - 6704 & j130817.51 - 670705.8 & & & 20.40 & 17.68 & + j1329.2 - 5608 & j132901.16 - 560802.5 & & & 17.38 & & 17.11 + j1330.1 - 7002 & j133011.34 - 700312.7 & & & 16.45 & 17.37 & + j1351.3 - 2909 & j135146.85 - 291217.4 & & & 20.22 & 19.44 & + j1406.2 - 2510 & j140609.60 - 250809.2 & 16.79 & 16.25 & 16.20 & 16.51 & 15.95 + j1416.3 - 2415 & j141642.23 - 241021.2 & 18.39 & 18.16 & 19.02 & 18.83 & 18.02 + j1419.4 - 0835 & j141922.56 - 083831.9 & 20.95 & 19.28 & 18.75 & 19.55 & 18.60 + j1514.6 - 4751 & j151440.03 - 474829.7 & & 17.61 & & 18.44 & 17.17 + j1518.2 - 2733 & j151803.60 - 273131.0 & 18.40 & 15.97 & 16.62 & 14.21 & 15.18 + j1553.2 - 2424 & j155331.62 - 242206.0 & 19.67 & 18.74 & 20.43 & 18.70 & 16.94 + j1558.3 + 8513 & j160031.76 + 850949.2 & 19.66 & 18.78 & 19.50 & 18.79 & 17.90 + j1604.5 - 4442 & j160431.03 - 444131.9 & & 17.50 & 20.00 & & + j1626.0 - 7636 & j162638.17 - 763855.4 & & 14.89 & 16.12 & 14.94 & 15.05 + j1725.1 - 7714 & j172350.86 - 771350.3 & & 19.12 & 19.71 & 18.94 & 18.31 + j1811.0 + 5340 & j181037.99 + 533501.5 & 18.88 & 18.77 & 19.34 & 18.45 & 16.71 + j1815.6 - 6407 & j181425.96 - 641008.8 & & 18.87 & 18.96 & 19.02 & + j1816.7 - 4942 & j181655.99 - 494344.7 & & 18.23 & 17.88 & 18.31 & 17.92 + j1818.7 + 2138 & j181905.22 + 213234.0 & 17.64 & 16.75 & 17.52 & 17.22 & 16.49 + j1820.6 + 3625 & j182023.61 + 362914.4 & 17.93 & 18.20 & & 17.94 & 17.43 + j1825.1 - 5231 & j182513.79 - 523058.1 & & 19.05 & 18.80 & 18.83 & 16.74 + j1830.0 + 1325 & j183000.76 + 132414.4 & 19.91 & 17.77 & 18.57 & 17.66 & 17.51 + j1830.2 - 4441 & j183000.86 - 444111.4 & & 16.54 & 18.17 & 17.47 & 16.88 + j1844.7 + 5716 & j184450.96 + 570938.6 & 17.69 & 17.79 & 18.52 & 17.49 & 17.55 + j1936.9 + 8402 & j193930.23 + 835925.8 & 19.59 & 18.55 & 18.89 & 19.11 & 18.45 + j1940.8 - 6213 & j194121.76 - 621120.8 & & & 21.07 & 20.04 & 18.53 + j1942.8 + 1033 & j194247.48 + 103327.2 & 18.59 & 16.82 & 16.69 & 15.37 & 15.24 + j1959.9 - 4727 & j195945.66 - 472519.2 & & 16.61 & 16.66 & 16.70 & 16.48 + j2103.6 - 6236 & j210338.38 - 623225.8 & & 16.00 & 17.83 & 16.24 & 16.13 + j2250.2 - 4205 & j225014.94 - 420218.6 & & 19.52 & 20.53 & 19.44 & 18.46 + & j225022.20 - 420613.2 & & 16.21 & 17.41 & 17.23 & 16.49 + j2317.3 - 4534 & j231731.97 - 453359.6 & & 17.36 & 18.24 & 18.80 & 17.44 + j2323.0 - 4918 & j232255.30 - 491942.0 & & 20.55 & 20.19 & 20.13 & 17.67 + j2324.6 + 0801 & j232445.31 + 080206.3 & 18.75 & 17.97 & 18.63 & 17.37 & 17.92 + j2325.4 + 1650 & j232526.62 + 164941.1 & 20.45 & & & 20.50 & + & j232538.11 + 164642.8 & 18.56 & 18.29 & 17.37 & 17.09 & 17.27 + Abstract:
[ "a significant fraction ( @xmath030% ) of the high - energy gamma - ray sources listed in the second _ fermi _ lat catalog ( 2fgl ) are still of unknown origin , being not yet associated with counterparts at low energies . we recently developed a new association method to identify if there is a @xmath1-ray blazar candidate within the positional uncertainty region of a generic 2fgl source . this method is entirely based on the discovery that blazars have distinct infrared colors with respect to other extragalactic sources found thanks , to the wide - field infrared survey explorer ( _ wise _ ) all - sky observations . several improvements have been also performed to increase the efficiency of our method in recognizing @xmath1-ray blazar candidates . in this paper we applied our method to two different samples , the first constituted by the unidentified @xmath1-ray sources ( ugss ) while the second by the active galaxies of uncertain type ( agus ) , both listed in the 2fgl . we present a catalog of ir counterparts for @xmath020% of the ugss investigated . then , we also compare our results on the associated sources with those present in literature . in addition , we illustrate the extensive archival research carried out to identify the radio , infrared , optical and x - ray counterparts of the _ wise _ selected , @xmath1-ray blazar candidates . finally , we discuss the future developments of our method based on ground - based follow - up observations ." ]
21,371
21,371
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the ability to simulate hydrodynamic flow is key to studying most astrophysical objects . supernova explosions , gamma - ray bursts , x - ray bursts , classical novae , the outbursts of luminous blue variables ( lbvs ) , and stellar winds are just a few phenomena for which understanding and numerical tools evolve in tandem . this is due in part to the physical complexity , multi - dimensional character , and instabilities of such dynamical fluids . moreover , rotation is frequently a factor in the dynamical development of astrophysical transients . one - dimensional hydrodynamics is by and large a solved problem , but multi - dimensional hydrodynamics is still a challenge . in the context of astrophysical theory , this is due primarily to the need to address time - dependent gravitational potentials , complicated equations of state ( eoss ) , flexible grids , multi - d shock structures , and chaotic and turbulent flows . as a result , theorists who aim to understand the universe devote much of their time to code development and testing . one of the outstanding and complex problems in theoretical astrophysics is the mechanism for core - collapse supernovae . for more than two decades , the preferred mechanism of explosion has been the delayed neutrino mechanism @xcite . one - dimensional ( 1d ) simulations generally fail to produce explosions @xcite . however , 2-dimensional ( 2d ) simulations , and the accompanying aspherical instabilities , suggest that the neutrino - mechanism may indeed be viable @xcite , though this has yet to be proven . in fact , @xcite have recently reported an acoustic mechanism , which seems to succeed on long timescales when and if other mechanisms fail . these authors identified two primary reasons why this mechanism might have been missed before : 1 ) 2d radiation - hydrodynamic simulations with reasonable approximations are still expensive to run , and with limited resources simulations are rarely carried to late enough times ; and 2 ) , a noteworthy feature of the code they used , vulcan/2d , is its arbitrary lagrangian - eulerian ( ale ) structure . vulcan/2d incorporates non - standard grids that liberate the inner core from the courant and resolution limitations of standard spherical grids . in this context , @xcite claim that simulating all degrees of freedom leads to a new mechanism in which the gravitational energy in aspherical accretion is converted to explosion energy by first exciting protoneutron star core g - modes . these modes then radiate acoustic power and revive the stalled shock into explosion . remarkably , the acoustic mechanism , given enough time , leads to successful core - collapse supernovae in all progenitors more massive than @xmath19 m@xmath2 simulated to date @xcite . however , this is a remarkable claim , and given the implications , must be thoroughly investigated . for instance , one question to ask is : could the results seen by @xcite be numerical artifacts of vulcan ? therefore , to address this and other issues that surround the acoustic supernova mechanism , as well as a host of other outstanding astrophysical puzzles , we have designed the new hydrodynamic code , bethe - hydro , from the bottom up . bethe - hydro will be coupled with the 2d mixed - frame radiation transport scheme of @xcite to create the 2d radiation / hydrodynamics code bethe , and the merger of these two codes will be the subject of a future paper . in this paper , we present and test the hydrodynamic and gravity algorithms of bethe - hydro . since bethe - hydro uses arbitrary grids and a general gravity solver , we expect it to be a powerful and flexible numerical tool , able to configure the grid to suit the computational challenge . the core of bethe - hydro is a 1d and 2d ale hydrodynamics solver . first , solutions to the lagrangian hydrodynamic equations are obtained on an arbitrary polygonal grid . then , to avoid tangled grids , the hydrodynamic variables can be remapped to another grid . a unique and powerful feature of ale schemes is their flexibility to tailor an arbitrary grid to the computational challenge and to alter the grid dynamically during runtime . hence , purely lagrangian , purely eulerian , or arbitrarily moving grids ( chosen to optimize numerical performance and resolution ) are possible . these grids can be non - orthogonal , non - spherical , and non - cartesian . some of the earliest 2d hydrodynamic simulations in astrophysics were , in fact , performed to address the core - collapse problem . while some employed standard fixed - grid schemes @xcite , other 2d simulations were calculated with adaptive grids . although many utilized moving grids , for the most part , the differencing formulations were eulerian @xcite . on the other hand , @xcite did employ an `` euler - lagrange '' method involving a lagrangian hydrodynamic solve , followed by a remapping stage . even though these simulations did exploit radially dynamical grids , they were restricted to be orthogonal and spherical . many of the current hydrodynamic algorithms used in astrophysics are based upon either zeus @xcite or higher - order godunov methods , in particular the piecewise - parabolic method ( ppm ) @xcite . both approaches have been limited to orthogonal grids . one concern with ppm - based codes is that they solve the hydrodynamic equations in dimensionally - split fashion . as a result , there have been concerns that these algorithms do not adequately resolve flows that are oblique to the grid orientation . rectifying this concern , recent unsplit higher - order godunov schemes , or approximations thereof , have been developed @xcite . despite this and the employment of adaptive mesh refinement ( amr ) , these codes must use orthogonal grids that are often strictly cartesian . in bethe - hydro , we use finite - difference schemes based upon the support - operator method @xcite of @xcite and @xcite . differencing by this technique enables conservation of energy to roundoff error in the absence of rotation and time - varying gravitational potentials . similarly , momentum is conserved accurately , but due to the artificial viscosity scheme that we employ , it is conserved to roundoff error for hydrodynamic simulations using cartesian coordinates only . moreover , using the support - operator method and borrowing from an adaptation of the support - operator technique for elliptic equations @xcite , we have developed a gravity solver for arbitrary grids . unfortunately , by including a general gravity capability , we sacrifice strict energy and momentum conservation . however , we have performed tests and for most cases the results are reasonably accurate . furthermore , we have included rotational terms and we use a modified version of the subcell pressure scheme to mitigate hourglass instabilities @xcite . to resolve shocks , we employ an artificial viscosity method , which is designed to maintain grid stability as well @xcite , and there are no restrictive assumptions made about the equation of state . higher - order godunov techniques employ riemann solvers to resolve shocks , but frequently need an artificial viscosity scheme to eliminate unwanted post - shock ringing . moreover , the inner workings of riemann solvers often make local approximations that the eos has a gamma - law form , which stipulates that as the internal energy goes to zero so does the pressure . for equations of state appropriate for core - collapse supernovae , this artificially imposed zero - point energy can pose problems for the simulations @xcite . two codes in astrophysics which have already capitalized on the arbitrary grid formulations of ale are djehuty @xcite and vulcan/2d @xcite . in both cases , the grids employed were designed to be spherical in the outer regions , but to transition smoothly to a cylindrical grid near the center . these grid geometries reflected the basic structure of stars , while avoiding the cumbersome singularity of a spherical grid . with this philosophy , @xcite , using djehuty , have studied the helium core flash phase of stellar evolution in 3d . in the core - collapse context , @xcite , using vulcan/2d , performed 2d radiation / hydrodynamic and radiation / mhd simulations with rotation . several gravity solvers have been employed in astrophysics . the most trivial are static or monopole approaches . for arbitrary potentials , the most extensively used are n - body schemes , which fit most naturally in smooth particle hydrodynamics ( sph ) codes @xcite . as a virtue , sph solves the equations in a grid - free context , and while sph has opened the way to three - dimensional ( 3d ) hydrodynamic simulations in astrophysics , including core - collapse simulations @xcite , the smoothing kernels currently employed pose serious problems for simulating fundamental hydrodynamic instabilities such as the kelvin - helmholtz instability @xcite . another approach to the solution of poisson s equation for gravity is the use of multipole expansions of the potential @xcite . this technique achieves its relative speed by calculating simple integrals on a spherical grid once . then , the stored integrals are used in subsequent timesteps . in bethe - hydro , we construct finite - difference equations for poisson s equation using the support - operator method and find solutions to the resulting linear system of equations for the potentials via an iterative multigrid - preconditioned conjugate - gradient method @xcite . in [ section : bethe_hydro ] , we give a summary of bethe - hydro and sketch the flowchart of the algorithm . the coordinates and mesh details are discussed in [ section : coords_mesh ] . we then describe in [ section : lag_hydro ] the discrete lagrangian equations , including specifics of the 2@xmath0-order time - integration and rotational terms . section [ section : gravity ] gives a complete description of the 1d and 2d gravity solvers . hydrodynamic boundary conditions are discussed in [ section : hydro_boundary ] . the artificial viscosity algorithm that provides shock resolution and grid stability is described in [ section : artificial_viscosity ] . in [ section : hourglass ] , we present the subcell pressure scheme that suppresses hourglass modes . remapping is described in depth in [ section : remap ] . in [ section : tests ] , we demonstrate the code s strengths and limitations with some test problems . finally , in [ section : discussion ] we summarize the central characteristics and advantages of bethe - hydro . in ale algorithms , the equations of hydrodynamics are solved in lagrangian form . within this framework , equations for the conservation of mass , momentum , and energy are : @xmath3 @xmath4 and @xmath5 @xmath6 is the mass density ( which we refer to simply as `` density '' and is distinct from the energy or momentum densities ) , @xmath7 is the fluid velocity , @xmath8 is the gravitational potential , @xmath9 is the isotropic pressure , @xmath10 is the specific internal energy , and @xmath11 is the lagrangian time derivative . the equation of state may have the following general form : @xmath12 where @xmath13 denotes the mass fraction of species @xmath14 . therefore , we also solve the conservation equations : @xmath15 completing the set of equations for self - gravitating astrophysical flows is poisson s equation for gravity : @xmath16 where @xmath17 is newton s gravitational constant . all ale methods have the potential to solve eqs . ( [ eq : mass_lag]-[eq : ene_lag ] ) using arbitrary , unstructured grids . in this lies the power and functionality of ale methods . the solutions involve two steps and are conceptually quite simple : 1 ) a lagrangian solver moves the nodes of the mesh in response to the hydrodynamic forces ; and 2 ) to avoid grid tangling , the nodes are repositioned , and a remapping algorithm interpolates hydrodynamic quantities from the old grid to this new grid . of course , the challenge is to find accurate solutions , while conserving energy and momentum . in constructing bethe - hydro to satisfy these requirements , we use the ale hydrodynamic techniques of @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite . to summarize the overall structure of bethe - hydro , we present a schematic flowchart , fig . [ flowchart ] , and briefly describe the key steps . establishing the structure for all subsequent routines , the first step is to construct the arbitrary , unstructured grid . this leads to the next step , problem initialization . then , the main loop for timestep integration is entered . after a call to the eos to obtain the pressure , solutions to poisson s equation for gravity are calculated using either the 2d or 1d algorithms in [ section : gravity ] . both use the support - operator method to discretize eq . ( [ eq : poisson ] ) , and the resulting system of linear equations is solved by a tridiagonal solver in 1d and a multigrid pre - conditioned conjugate - gradient iterative method in 2d ( [ section : gravity ] ) . after the timestep is calculated ( [ section : predictor_corrector ] ) , the lagrangian equations of hydrodynamics are solved on an arbitrary grid using the compatible hydrodynamics algorithm of @xcite ( see [ section : lag_hydro ] for further discussion ) . to ensure 2nd - order accuracy in both space and time , we employ a predictor - corrector iteration ( [ section : predictor_corrector ] ) , in which a second call to the eos and the gravity solver are required . other than the gravity solver block , the lagrangian hydrodynamics solver ( [ section : lag_hydro ] ) is represented by the set of steps beginning with predictor and ending with corrector ( fig . [ flowchart ] ) . after finding lagrangian hydrodynamic solutions at each timestep , one could proceed directly to the next timestep , maintaining the lagrangian character throughout the simulation . however , in multiple spatial dimensions , grid tangling will corrupt flows with significant vorticity . in these circumstances , we conservatively remap the lagrangian solution to a new arbitrary grid that mitigates tangled grids . the new grid may be the original grid , in which case we are solving the hydrodynamic equations in the eulerian frame , or it may be a new , arbitrarily - defined , grid . in bethe - hydro , eqs . ( [ eq : mass_lag]-[eq : poisson ] ) may be solved with any of several coordinate systems and assumed symmetries . included are the standard 1d & 2d cartesian coordinate systems . for astrophysical applications , we use 1d spherical and 2d cylindrical coordinate systems . irrespective of the coordinate system , we indicate a position by @xmath18 . the components of the cartesian coordinate system are @xmath19 and @xmath20 ; the spherical components are @xmath21 , @xmath22 , and @xmath23 ; and the cylindrical coordinates are @xmath21 , @xmath24 , and @xmath23 . distinct from the coordinate system is the grid , or mesh , which defines an arbitrary discretization of space . it is this unique feature and foundation of ale techniques that provides their flexibility . figure [ grid_ex ] shows two example grids : the butterfly mesh on the left and a spiderweb mesh on the right . either may be used in a 2d cartesian or 2d cylindrical simulations , although the placement of the nodes is neither cartesian nor cylindrical . instead , these meshes have been designed to simulate spherically or cylindrically convergent phenomena without the limitation of small zones near the center . when using cylindrical coordinates in ale algorithms , one may use control - volume differencing ( cvd ) or area - weighted differencing ( awd ) ; we use cvd . thorough comparisons of these two differencing schemes may be found in @xcite . here , we give a basic justification for choosing cvd . for cvd , the volumes of the subcell , cell , and node are calculated by straightforward partitioning of these regions by edges . hence , volumes and masses are exact representations of their respective regions . while this discretization is natural and easy to comprehend , it does not preserve strict spherical symmetry when using a spherical grid and cylindrical coordinates . on the other hand , awd is designed to preserve spherically symmetric flows , but only with the use of spherical grids that have equal spacing in angle . since this prevents the use of arbitrary grids , and the asymmetries of cvd are small , we use cvd for discretization . construction of the grid begins with the arbitrary placement of nodes . at these nodes , coordinate positions , velocities , and accelerations are defined . simply specifying node locations does not completely define a mesh , since there is not a unique way to assign cells and masses to these nodes . therefore , the user must specify the connectivity among nodes , which define the arbitrarily - shaped polygonal cells . it is within these cells that cell - centered averages of @xmath6 , @xmath10 , @xmath9 , @xmath13 , and @xmath8 are defined . with the node positions , their connectivity , and the cells defined , a mesh is completely specified and all other useful descriptions follow . cells are denoted by @xmath24 , and nodes are indexed by @xmath25 . the set of nodes that defines cell @xmath24 are @xmath26 , where the nodes are ordered counterclockwise . conversely , the set of cells that shares node @xmath25 is denoted by @xmath27 . each cell has @xmath28 nodes that define it , and each node has @xmath29 cells that share it . the sample sub - grid depicted in fig . [ fig : grid ] helps to illustrate the nodal and cell structure . the filled circles indicate node positions , @xmath30 , and the crosses indicate the cell - center positions , @xmath31 . the solid lines are direction - oriented edges that separate cells from one another , and the open circles indicate their mid - edge locations . partitioning the cell into subcells , the dashed lines connect the mid - edges with the cell centers . no matter how many sides a cell has , with this particular division the subcells are always quadrilaterals . naturally , the cell volumes ( see appendix [ section : integrals ] for formulae calculating discrete volumes ) , @xmath32 , are related to the subcell volumes , @xmath33 , by @xmath34 furthermore , each node has a volume , @xmath35 , defined by the adjoining subcells that share the node @xmath25 : @xmath36 for calculating pressure forces and fluxes , vectors are assigned to each half edge on either side of node @xmath25 : @xmath37 and @xmath38 , where @xmath39 indicates the half edge in the counterclockwise direction around the cell and @xmath40 indicates its opposite counterpart . their magnitudes are the areas represented by the half edges , and their directions point outward and normal to the surface of cell @xmath24 . from these half - edge area vectors , an area vector , @xmath41 , that is associated with zone @xmath24 and node @xmath25 is then defined : @xmath42 similarly , vectors are associated with the lines connecting the mid - edges and the cell centers : @xmath43 . again , their magnitudes are the corresponding area , but while the vector is normal to this line , the direction is oriented counterclockwise around the cell . the fundamental assumption of lagrangian algorithms is that the mass , @xmath44 , of a discrete volume @xmath32 is constant with time . for staggered - grid methods , in which scalars are defined as cell - centered averages and vectors are defined at the nodes , it is necessary to define a lagrangian mass , @xmath45 , for the nodes as well . this nodal mass is associated with the node s volume @xmath35 ( eq . [ eq : volume_node ] ) . conservation of mass ( eq . [ eq : mass_lag ] ) implies zero mass flux across the boundaries , @xmath46 , of either the cell volume or nodal volume . therefore , the region of overlap for @xmath32 and @xmath35 , which is the subcell volume @xmath33 , is bounded by surfaces with zero mass flux . consequently , the most elemental lagrangian mass is the subcell mass , @xmath47 , and the cell mass ( @xmath44 ) and node mass ( @xmath45 ) are constructed as appropriate sums of subcell masses : @xmath48 and @xmath49 hence , we arrive at three discrete forms of mass conservation ( eq . [ eq : mass_lag ] ) : @xmath50 in defining the discrete momentum and energy equations , we use the compatible hydrodynamics algorithms developed by @xcite . specifically , the discrete divergence and gradient operators are _ compatible _ in that they faithfully represent their analog in continuous space _ and _ their definitions are expressly related to one another using the hydrodynamic expressions for conservation of momentum and energy . as a result , this approach leads to discretizations that satisfy momentum and energy conservation to machine accuracy . this is accomplished with the support - operator method @xcite . given the integral identity , @xmath51 where @xmath8 is any scalar and @xmath52 is some vector , there is an incontrovertible connection between the divergence and gradient operators . for many choices of discretization , the discrete counterparts of these operators could violate this integral identity . simply put , the goal of the support - operator method is to define the discrete operators so that they satisfy eq . ( [ eq : intidentity ] ) . the first step is to define one of the discrete operators . it is often , but not necessary , that the discrete divergence operator is defined via gauss s law : @xmath53 and then eq . ( [ eq : intidentity ] ) is used to compatibly define the other discrete operator . discretizing the hydrodynamic equations , @xcite begin by defining @xmath54 at the nodes and use the integral form of energy conservation and an equation equivalent to eq . ( [ eq : intidentity ] ) to define for each cell the discrete divergence of the velocity , @xmath55 . to begin , @xcite integrate eq . ( [ eq : mom_lag ] ) ( excluding gravity and rotational terms ) over the volume of node @xmath25 , producing the discrete form for @xmath56 and the momentum equation : @xmath57 where @xmath58 is the change in velocity from timestep @xmath59 to the next timestep @xmath60 , the timestep is @xmath61 , and @xmath62 is the pressure in cell @xmath24 . in other words , the net force on node @xmath25 is a sum of the pressure times the directed zone areas that share node @xmath25 . hence , the subcell force exerted by zone @xmath24 on point @xmath25 is @xmath63 . a more complete description of the subcell force , however , must account for artificial viscosity ( [ section : artificial_viscosity ] ) : @xmath64 where @xmath65 is the subcell force due to artificial viscosity . furthermore , in this work , we include gravity and rotation for 2d axisymmetric simulations , and the full discrete momentum equation becomes @xmath66 where @xmath67 and @xmath68 are the gravitational and rotational accelerations , respectively . for simplicity , and to parallel the discussion in @xcite , we ignore these terms in the momentum equation and proceed with the compatible construction of the energy equation ( see [ section : consenerot ] and [ section : consenegravity ] for discussions of total energy conservation including rotation and gravity , respectively ) . to construct the discrete energy equation , @xcite integrate eq . ( [ eq : ene_lag ] ) over the discrete volume of cell @xmath24 : @xmath69 where @xmath70 . then , the objective is to determine a discrete form for the right hand side of this equation that conserves energy and makes the discrete gradient and divergence operators compatible . @xcite accomplish this with the integral for conservation of energy ( neglecting gravity ) : @xmath71 where the second expression is the integral identity , eq . ( [ eq : intidentity ] ) , that defines the physical relationship between the gradient and divergence operators . neglecting boundary terms , the discrete form of this integral is @xmath72 where we used @xmath73 , @xmath74 , and substituted in eq . ( [ eq : mom_discrete1 ] ) . if we set the expression for each zone in eq . ( [ eq : enecons_discrete ] ) to zero , we arrive at the compatible energy equation : @xmath75 the rhs of eq . ( [ eq : ene_discrete ] ) is merely the @xmath76 work term of the first law of thermodynamics . its unconventional form is a consequence of the support - operator method . thus , we derive two significant results . first , inspection of eqs . ( [ eq : ene_discrete ] ) and ( [ eq : mom_discrete1 ] ) leads to compatible definitions for the discrete gradient and divergence operators . specifically , the discrete analogs of the gradient and divergence operators are @xmath77 and @xmath78 second , eqs . ( [ eq : mass_discrete ] ) , ( [ eq : mom_discrete1 ] ) , and ( [ eq : ene_discrete ] ) form the compatible discrete equations of lagrangian hydrodynamics . in its current form , bethe - hydro strictly conserves momentum for simulations that use cartesian coordinates and not cylindrical coordinates . @xcite show that the requirement for strict conservation is the use of control - volume differencing , or that exact representations of cell surfaces are employed . as a simple example , consider momentum conservation with pressure forces only : @xmath79 for cartesian coordinates , the sum @xmath80 is exactly zero for each cell as long as the surface - area vectors are exact representations of the cell s surface . this is not the case for area - weighted differencing , and hence momentum is not conserved in that case . for cylindrical coordinates , the sum of surface - area vectors gives zero only for the @xmath24-component . however , the assumption of symmetry about the cylindrical axis ensures momentum conservation for the @xmath21-component . therefore , control - volume differencing ensures momentum conservation , even with the use of cylindrical coordinates . based upon similar arguments , the subcell - pressure forces that eliminate hourglass motions ( [ section : hourglass ] ) are formulated to conserve momentum for both cartesian and cylindrical coordinates . on the other hand , because we multiply the cartesian artificial viscosity force by @xmath81 to obtain the force appropriate for cylindrical coordinates , the artificial viscosity scheme ( [ section : artificial_viscosity ] ) that we employ is conservative for cartesian coordinates only . we test momentum conservation with the sedov blast wave problem ( [ section : sedov ] ) using cartesian and cylindrical coordinates . symmetry dictates conservation in the @xmath21-component of the momentum . consequently , we compare the @xmath24-component of the total momentum at @xmath82 s with subsequent times . since the initial momentum of this test is zero , we obtain a relative error in momentum by @xmath83 , where @xmath84 is the @xmath24-component of the total momentum at time @xmath85 and @xmath86 is a similar quantity for @xmath87 . as expected , the relative error using cartesian coordinates reflects roundoff error . for cylindrical coordinates and 35,000 cells , the relative error in momentum is @xmath88 after 0.8 s and 71,631 timesteps . although momentum is strictly conserved for simulations using cartesian coordinates only , the sedov blast wave problem demonstrates that momentum is conserved very accurately , even when cylindrical coordinates are used . our method is explicit in time . therefore , for numerical convergence , we limit the timestep , @xmath61 , to be smaller than three timescales . by the courant - friedrichs - levy ( cfl ) condition we limit @xmath61 to be smaller than the shortest sound - crossing time and the time it takes flow to traverse a cell . the latter condition is useful to avoid tangled meshes and is necessary when remapping is used . in addition , it is limited to be smaller than the fractional change in the volume represented by @xmath55 . in calculating these timescales a characteristic length for each cell is needed . given arbitrary polygonal grids , we simply use the shortest edge for each cell . in practice , the timestep is the shortest of these timescales multiplied by a scaling factor , cfl . in our calculations , we set @xmath89 . to ensure second - order accuracy and consistency with the time levels specified in eqs . ( [ eq : mom_discrete2 ] ) and ( [ eq : ene_discrete ] ) , we employ predictor - corrector time integration using the finite difference stencil from @xcite . for each timestep , the current time level of each quantity is identified with @xmath59 in superscript . the time - centered quantities are indicated with a @xmath90 superscript , while the predicted values are labeled @xmath91 , and the fully updated values for the next timestep are labeled with a @xmath60 superscript . table [ table : predictor - corrector ] lists the steps for the predictor - corrector integration . the predictor step begins by defining the forces on nodes , @xmath92 , using current pressures @xmath93 , areas @xmath94 , and artificial viscosity forces @xmath95 . ( [ eq : mom_discrete2 ] ) is then used to calculate the predicted velocity , @xmath96 . the predicted node coordinate is then calculated by @xmath97 , where @xmath98 is the time - centered velocity computed as @xmath99 . then , using @xmath92 and @xmath98 in eq . ( [ eq : ene_discrete ] ) , the predicted specific internal energy , @xmath100 , is obtained . using the predicted node positions , the predicted rotational acceleration ( @xmath101 ) , volume ( @xmath102 ) , and density ( @xmath103 ) , are computed , which in turn are used to calculate the predicted gravitational acceleration , @xmath104 . calling the eos with @xmath100 and @xmath103 gives the predicted pressure @xmath105 . we finish the predictor step and prepare for the corrector step by calculating the time - centered positions @xmath106 , pressures @xmath107 , rotational accelerations @xmath108 , and gravitational accelerations @xmath109 as simple averages of their values at the @xmath110 and @xmath59 time levels . the corrector step then proceeds similarly to the predictor step . @xmath107 and @xmath111 are used to compute @xmath112 , which in turn is used to compute the updated velocity , @xmath113 . after computing the new time - centered velocity , the node coordinates are finally updated using the time - centered velocity . then , the specific internal energy , @xmath114 , is updated using @xmath112 and @xmath98 . finally , the volume , @xmath115 , and density @xmath116 are computed for the next timestep . in 2d simulations using cylindrical coordinates , we have extended bethe - hydro to include rotation about the axis of symmetry . for azimuthally symmetric configurations , all partial derivatives involving @xmath23 are zero . consequently , the conservation of mass and energy equations are @xmath117 and @xmath118 where the @xmath119 subscript on the del operator reminds us that the derivatives with respect to @xmath23 vanish . for concise notation , we define a pseudo lagrangian derivative : @xmath120 while eqs . ( [ eq : mass_lag_rot ] ) and ( [ eq : ene_lag_rot ] ) are simple extensions of the true mass ( eq . [ eq : mass_lag ] ) and energy ( eq . [ eq : ene_lag ] ) equations , the presence of `` christoffel '' terms in the momentum equation give it extra terms : @xmath121 where the extra rotational terms are represented by @xmath122 : @xmath123 to see the origin of these extra terms , one must begin with the momentum equation in cylindrical coordinates and eulerian form : @xmath124 again , dropping terms involving partial derivatives of @xmath23 , and moving all terms not involving partial derivatives to the right - hand side ( rhs ) , eq . ( [ eq : mom_cyl ] ) reduces to @xmath125 hence , using our definition for the pseudo lagrangian derivative , @xmath126 , and @xmath127 in eq . ( [ eq : mom_azsymmetric ] ) we obtain eq . ( [ eq : mom_lag_rot ] ) . it is now apparent why @xmath126 is a pseudo lagrangian derivative . strictly , the `` extra '' rotational terms are a result of `` christoffel '' terms in the true lagrangian derivative . therefore , in defining @xmath126 without them , we ve defined a pseudo lagrangian derivative . conveniently , the @xmath23 component of eq . ( [ eq : mom_lag_rot ] ) , @xmath128 is simply a statement of the conservation of angular momentum about the axis of symmetry : @xmath129 where @xmath130 is the angular momentum about the @xmath24-axis of a lagrangian mass . other than the appearance of an extra term on the rhs of the @xmath21-component and of an equation for the @xmath23 component in eq . ( [ eq : mom_lag_rot ] ) , the 2d hydrodynamic equations including rotation about the @xmath24-axis are similar to the equations without rotation . therefore , the algorithms for dynamics in the 2d plane remain the same , except for the inclusion of the conservation of angular momentum equation and the fictitious force term . it seems natural to define @xmath131 and @xmath132 , where @xmath133 is the angular velocity of node @xmath25 . in fact , our first implementation of rotation did just this . however , results indicated that this definition presents problems near the axis of rotation . whether @xmath134 or @xmath133 is defined , the angular momentum at node @xmath25 is associated with the region of subcells that comprise the node s volume . for the nodes on the axis , this definition states that @xmath135 since @xmath136 , which implies that the angular momentum for the region of subcells near the axis is zero . this awkward feature causes no problems for lagrangian calculations with no remapping . however , during the subcell remapping step , the subcells near the axis contain no angular momentum , yet physically there should be some angular momentum to be remapped . therefore , we have devised an alternative method for including rotational terms in 2d simulations . just as for mass , the angular momentum of a subcell , @xmath137 , is a primary indivisible unit , which by eq . ( [ eq : cons_ang ] ) is constant during a lagrangian hydrodynamic timestep . the angular momentum for a cell is @xmath138 and for each node is @xmath139 to relate angular velocity and @xmath140 to the angular momentum , we treat each subcell as a unit with constant angular velocity . for such regions of space the angular momentum is related to the angular velocity by @xmath141 where @xmath142 is the moment of inertia for subcell @xmath143 . since we are interested in accelerations and velocities at the nodes , we choose that @xmath144 , which naturally leads to @xmath145 substituting eq . ( [ eq : define_jzp ] ) into eq . ( [ eq : define_jp ] ) , we define a relationship between the angular momentum at the nodes and the angular velocity at the nodes : @xmath146 where @xmath147 by conservation of angular momentum , @xmath148 , the angular velocity at the @xmath60 timestep , @xmath149 , is @xmath150 finally , a new form for the @xmath21-component of @xmath68 is constructed . the previously defined form is @xmath151 , and having @xmath21 in the denominator poses numerical problems near and at @xmath152 . since @xmath153 , the new half timestep acceleration is @xmath154 without rotation and time - varying gravity , the equations for 2d simulations using cylindrical coordinates conserve energy to machine precision . however , with rotation , strict energy conservation is lost . using the equations for energy and momentum including rotation , eqs . ( [ eq : ene_lag_rot ] ) and ( [ eq : mom_lag_rot ] ) the energy integral becomes @xmath155 since the terms @xmath156 and @xmath157 are equal in magnitude and opposite in sign , the rate of change for the total energy reduces to the usual surface integral : @xmath158 if the form of the energy equation is to remain the same , discrete versions of @xmath156 and @xmath157 must be derived that cancel one another . in the previous section , we made arguments not to use @xmath159 . however , it is simpler and more intuitive to illustrate why the 2d equations , including rotation , can not satisfy strict energy conservation , while satisfying angular momentum conservation . with conservation of angular momentum we have @xmath160 or @xmath161 the discrete time derivative of @xmath140 is then @xmath162 where we have used @xmath163 . this specifics the required time levels for the components of @xmath164 to conserve angular momentum . considering time integration , the discrete analog of @xmath165 is @xmath166 . to ensure that this sums to zero , the discrete analog of @xmath167 is @xmath168 with these time levels , the 2d equations , which include rotation , would satisfy energy and angular momentum conservation to round - off error however , @xmath169 and @xmath170 are not known at the beginning of the timestep . it is only after the predictor step of the predictor - corrector method that @xmath170 and @xmath171 are obtained . as a result , @xmath167 , including the correct time levels and predictor values , is @xmath172 but to conserve angular momentum and energy , @xmath169 appears in the denominator . therefore , the terms @xmath173 and @xmath174 will not be exactly opposite and equal in magnitude , and angular momentum and energy conservation can not be enforced to machine precision at the same time . in the previous section , we motivated a different discretization of angular momentum , angular velocity , and @xmath140 . however , the basic results of this section do not change . there is still the fundamental problem that to strictly conserve angular momentum , positions at the @xmath60 time level are required , while one must use the predicted , @xmath91 , values in updating the radial velocity . sacrificing strict energy conservation , we have chosen to strictly conserve angular momentum for simulations including rotation . we have designed a test that isolates and tests rotation . using cylindrical coordinates , the calculational domain lies in the @xmath175 plane and extends from the symmetry axis , @xmath176 , to @xmath177 cm and from @xmath178 cm to @xmath179 cm . the initial density is homogeneous with @xmath180 g @xmath181 . isolating the rotational forces , we eliminate pressure gradients by setting the internal energy everywhere to zero . consequently , the trajectory of a lagrangian mass is a straight line in 3d and has a very simple analytic evolution for @xmath182 , determined only by its initial position and velocity . we set @xmath183 and give @xmath140 and @xmath184 homologous profiles : @xmath185 cm s@xmath186 and @xmath187 cm s@xmath186 . this produces a homologous self - similar solution for @xmath184 and @xmath140 that our algorithm for rotation should reproduce . in figure [ rottestplot ] , plots of @xmath140 vs. @xmath21 ( top panel ) and @xmath188 vs. @xmath21 panel ( bottom ) show that bethe - hydro performs well with this test . simultaneously testing the rotational remapping ( [ section : ang_vel_remap ] ) and hydrodynamic algorithms , we employ three remapping regions . the inner 0.1 cm is eulerian , zones exterior to 0.2 cm follow lagrangian dynamics , and the region in between provides a smooth transition between the two domains . both @xmath140 and @xmath188 profiles are presented at @xmath189 , and @xmath190 s. as designed the angular momentum is conserved to machine accuracy . in the top panel ( @xmath140 vs. @xmath21 ) , it is hard to discern any deviation of the simulation ( crosses ) from the analytic solution ( solid line ) . in fact , the maximum error as measured by @xmath191 ranges from @xmath192 near the beginning of the simulation to @xmath193 at the end . @xmath188 vs. @xmath21 ( bottom panel ) shows similar accuracy , except for the region near the axis . at the center @xmath194 reaches a maximum value of 0.2 rads s@xmath186 at @xmath195 s. on the whole , fig . [ rottestplot ] demonstrates that this code reproduces the analytic result with and without remapping . there are two general strategies for solving poisson s equation for gravity on arbitrary grids . the first is to define another regular grid , interpolate the density from the hydro grid to this new gravity grid , and use many of the standard poisson solvers for regular grids . however , in our experience this approach can lead to numerical errors , which may lead to unsatisfactory results . the second approach is to solve eq . ( [ eq : poisson ] ) explicitly on the arbitrary hydro grid , eliminating an interpolation step . we prefer the latter approach , giving potentials and accelerations that are more consistent with the hydrodynamics on an unstructured mesh . in determining the discrete analogs of eq . ( [ eq : poisson ] ) , we use the support - operator method . after a bit of algebra these discrete equations may be expressed as a set of linear equations whose unknowns are the discretized gravitational potentials . solving for these potentials is akin to solving a matrix equation of the form , @xmath196 , and since the solutions change little from timestep to timestep , we use an iterative matrix inversion approach in which the initial guess is the solution from the previous timestep . in solving poisson s equation for gravity , we seek an algorithm satisfying the following conditions : 1 ) the potential should be defined at zone centers and the gravitational acceleration should be defined at the nodes ; 2 ) we should conserve momentum and energy as accurately as possible ; and 3 ) the solver must be fast . to this end , we employ the method described in @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite for elliptic solvers . specifically , we follow the particular implementation of @xcite . applying the support - operator method , we first define the divergence operator and , in particular , define @xmath197 . poisson s equation for gravity may be written as an equation for the divergence of the acceleration , @xmath198 where @xmath199 , the gravitational acceleration , is the negative of the gradient of the potential . @xmath200 integrating eq . ( [ eq : poisson_div ] ) over a finite volume gives @xmath201 and if the volume of integration , @xmath202 , is chosen to be that of a cell , the rhs of eq . ( [ eq : divtheorem ] ) becomes @xmath203 . in discretizing the middle term in eq . ( [ eq : divtheorem ] ) , @xmath204 an expression for the divergence of @xmath199 follows naturally : @xmath205 where @xmath206 is the area of edge @xmath207 , and @xmath208 is the component of the acceleration parallel to the direction of the edge s area vector . therefore , substituting eq . ( [ eq : discretediv ] ) into eq . ( [ eq : divtheorem ] ) suggests a discrete expression for eq . ( [ eq : poisson_div ] ) : @xmath209 having defined the discrete divergence of a vector , we then use the support - operator method to write the discrete equivalent of the gradient . once again , the integral identity relating the divergence and gradient operators is given by eq . ( [ eq : intidentity ] ) . applying the definition for the discrete divergence , the first term on the lhs of eq . ( [ eq : intidentity ] ) is approximated by @xmath210 where @xmath211 is the component of @xmath52 perpendicular to edge @xmath207 , and the rhs of eq . ( [ eq : intidentity ] ) is approximated by @xmath212 it is already apparent that the discrete potential is defined for both cell centers ( @xmath213 ) and edges ( @xmath214 ) . this fact seems cumbersome . however , we will demonstrate below that in the final equations the number of unknowns may be reduced by eliminating the cell - centered potentials , @xmath213 , in favor of the edge - centered potentials , @xmath214 . completing the discretization of eq . ( [ eq : intidentity ] ) , the second term on the lhs is @xmath215 where @xmath216 is a volumetric weight and @xmath217 and @xmath67 are defined at the nodes . the volumetric weight associated with each corner is defined as one quarter of the area of the parallelogram created by the sides that define the corner . additionally , the weights are normalized so that @xmath218 . the remaining task is to define the dot product @xmath219 at each corner when the vector is expressed in components of a nonorthogonal basis set : @xmath220 where @xmath221 and @xmath222 are basis vectors located at the center of the edges on either side of the corner associated with node @xmath25 with orientations perpendicular to the edges , and @xmath223 and @xmath211 are the corresponding magnitudes in this basis set . with this basis set , the inner product is @xmath224 where @xmath225 \ , , \ ] ] and @xmath226 is the angle formed by edges @xmath207 and @xmath227 . using eqs . ( [ eq : h_basis])-([eq : smatrix ] ) in eq . ( [ eq : intidentity_lhs2 ] ) , the second term on the lhs of eq . ( [ eq : intidentity ] ) is @xmath228 where @xmath229 and @xmath230 . combining eqs . ( [ eq : intidentity_lhs1 ] ) , ( [ eq : intidentity_rhs ] ) , and ( [ eq : intidentity_lhs2 ] ) , we have the discrete form of the identity eq . ( [ eq : intidentity ] ) : @xmath231 = 0 \ , .\end{gathered}\ ] ] to find the equation for @xmath208 on each edge we set the corresponding @xmath232 and set all others to zero . this gives an expression for @xmath208 in terms of @xmath214 , @xmath213 , and the other edge - centered accelerations of cell @xmath24 : @xmath233 = 0\end{gathered}\ ] ] or @xmath234 \\ = ( \phi_e - \phi_z)a_e \ , .\end{gathered}\ ] ] together , the set of equations for the edges of cell @xmath24 forms a matrix equation of the form on the @xmath24-axis are zero because the areas on the axis of symmetry are zero . therefore , for the zones along the axis , one less equation and variable appear in the set of equations for @xmath208 . ] @xmath235 where @xmath236 is a vector based upon the edge values , @xmath237 . inverting this equation gives an expression for the edge accelerations as a function of the cell- and edge - centered potentials : @xmath238 after finding the edge acceleration for each zone , these values are inserted into eq . ( [ eq : discretepoisson_div ] ) . the stencil of potentials for this equation for each cell includes the cell center and all edges . while eq . ( [ eq : gacc_phiz_phie ] ) gives the edge accelerations associated with cell @xmath24 , there is no guarantee that the equivalent equation for a neighboring cell will give the same acceleration for the same edge . to ensure continuity , we must include an equation which equates an edge s acceleration vectors from the neighboring cells : @xmath239 where @xmath240 and @xmath241 are the edge accelerations as determined by eq . ( [ eq : gacc_phiz_phie ] ) for the left ( @xmath242 ) and right ( @xmath243 ) cells . while we could have chosen a simpler expression for eq . ( [ eq : gacc_continuity ] ) , the choice of sign and coefficients ensures that the eventual system of linear equations involves a symmetric positive - definite matrix . this enables the use of fast and standard iterative matrix inversion methods such as the conjugate - gradient method . the stencil for this equation involves the edge in question , the cell centers on either side , and the rest of the edges associated with these cells . at first glance , it seems that we need to invert the system of equations that includes the cell - centered equations , eq . ( [ eq : gacc_phiz_phie ] ) , and the edge - centered equations , eq . ( [ eq : gacc_continuity ] ) . instead , we use eq . ( [ eq : discretepoisson_div ] ) to express the cell - centered potentials in terms of edge - centered potentials and the rhs of the equation : @xmath244 where @xmath245 , and @xmath246 substituting eq . ( [ eq : phizeq ] ) into the expression for the edge acceleration , eq . ( [ eq : gacc_phiz_phie ] ) , @xmath247 where @xmath248 . finally , substituting eq . ( [ eq : gacc_phie ] ) into eq . ( [ eq : gacc_continuity ] ) gives the matrix equation for gravity with only edge - centered potential unknowns : @xmath249 the stencil for this equation involves the edge and all other edges associated with the zones on either side of the edge in question . taken together , the equations result in a set of linear equations for the edge - centered potentials , @xmath214 . since this class of matrix equations is ubiquitous , there exists many accurate and fast linear system solvers we can exploit . to do so , we recast our discrete form of poisson s equation as @xmath250 where @xmath251 is a vector of the edge - centered potentials , and @xmath252 is the corresponding vector of source terms . we solve the matrix equation using the conjugate - gradient method with a multigrid preconditioner . in particular , we use the algebraic multigrid package , amg1r6 for details on performance . ] @xcite . unfortunately , this discretization scheme does not adequately define the accelerations at the nodes where they are needed in eq . ( [ eq : mom_discrete2 ] ) . therefore , we use the least - squares minimization method to determine the gradient on the unstructured mesh . assuming a linear function for the potential in the neighborhood of node @xmath14 , @xmath253 , we seek to minimize the difference between @xmath254 and @xmath255 , where @xmath254 is the neighbor s value and @xmath255 is the evaluation of @xmath253 at the position of the neighbor , @xmath256 . more explicitly , we minimize the following equation : @xmath257 where the `` neighbors '' are the nearest cell - centers and edges to node @xmath14 and are denoted by @xmath258 , @xmath259 @xmath260 , @xmath261 , and @xmath262 . usually , minimization of eq . ( [ eq : least_gacc_eq1 ] ) leads to a matrix equation for two unknowns : @xmath263 and @xmath264 , the gradients for @xmath8 in the @xmath19 and @xmath20 directions , respectively ( [ section : swept ] ) . however , @xmath265 , the potential at the node is not defined and is a third unknown with which eq . ( [ eq : least_gacc_eq1 ] ) must be minimized . performing the least - squares minimization process with respect to the three unknowns , @xmath265 , @xmath263 , and @xmath264 , leads to the following set of linear equations for each node : @xmath266 where @xmath267 inversion of this linear system gives the potential and the gradient at the node . specifically , we use the adjoint matrix inversion method to find the inverse matrix and the three unknowns , including @xmath263 and @xmath264 . the outer boundary condition we employ for the poisson solver is a multipole expansion for the gravitational potential at a spherical outer boundary . assuming no material exists outside the calculational domain and that the potential asymptotes to zero , the potential at the outer boundary , @xmath268 , is given by @xmath269 where @xmath270 is the usual legendre polynomial . in discretized form , ( [ eq : boundary_eq1 ] ) becomes @xmath271 where @xmath272 is the order at which the multipole expansion is truncated . for 1d spherically symmetric simulations , calculation of gravity can be straightforward using @xmath273 where @xmath274 is all of the mass enclosed by point @xmath25 . instead , we solve poisson s equation for gravity using similar methods to those employed for the 2d gravity . by doing this , we remain consistent when comparing our 1d and 2d results . furthermore , we show that deriving a poisson solver based upon the support - operator method is equivalent to the more traditional form , eq . ( [ eq : gacc_enclosed ] ) . the inherent symmetries of 1d spherical simulations reduce eq . ( [ eq : ge_equation ] ) to the following form : @xmath275 unlike the full 2d version , one may eliminate the edge potentials in favor for the cell - centered potentials and the accelerations at the edges . since each edge @xmath207 will have an equation for its value associated with cells @xmath24 and @xmath276 , this leads to @xmath277 using the continuity of accelerations at the edges , @xmath278 the expression for gravitational acceleration at edge @xmath207 in terms of the cell - centered potentials is @xmath279 substituting this expression into @xmath280 leads to a tridiagonal matrix equation for the cell - centered potential , which can be inverted in o(n ) operations to give the cell - centered potentials . substituting these cell - centered potentials back into eq . ( [ eq : gacc_1dsph ] ) gives the gravitational acceleration needed for the momentum equation ( eqs . [ eq : mom_lag ] and [ eq : mom_discrete2 ] ) . it should be noted that eq . ( [ eq:1dgaussgravity ] ) can be rewritten as a recursion relation for the gravitational acceleration , @xmath281 , at node @xmath25 : @xmath282 where @xmath283 is the mass of the cell interior to point @xmath25 . with the boundary condition @xmath284 and then recursively solving eq . ( [ eq : recursive ] ) for @xmath281 from the center outward , the expression for the gravitational acceleration simplifies to eq . ( [ eq : gacc_enclosed ] ) . this is the traditional form by which the gravitational acceleration is calculated for 1d spherically symmetric simulations and for which the potential is usually not referenced . the beauty of our approach is that 1d and 2d simulations are consistent , and that it self - consistently gives the gravitational potential . for self - gravitating hydrodynamic systems , the total energy is @xmath285 where @xmath286 is the total internal energy , @xmath287 is the total kinetic energy , and @xmath288 is the total potential energy : @xmath289 an alternative form is possible with the substitution of eq . ( [ eq : poisson_div ] ) into eq . ( [ eq : totpot1 ] ) and integration by parts : @xmath290 \ , .\ ] ] the integral form of eq . ( [ eq : totalenergy ] ) is @xmath291 and total energy conservation is given by @xmath292 since the solution to poisson s equation for gravity , using green s function , is @xmath293 the time derivative of the total potential energy may take three forms : @xmath294 note that this is true only for the total potential energy and does not imply @xmath295 . using eq . ( [ eq : dudt ] ) and the eulerian form of the hydrodynamics equations ( see appendix [ section : eulerian_hydro ] ) , eq . ( [ eq : dedt ] ) becomes a surface integral : @xmath296 which simply states that energy is conserved in the absence of a flux of energy through the bounding surface . the discrete analogs of @xmath286 and @xmath287 are trivially obtained using @xmath297 and @xmath298 , respectively . the discrete total potential energy may take two forms , the analogs of eqs . ( [ eq : totpot1 ] ) and ( [ eq : totpot2 ] ) : @xmath299 \ , , \\ \end{array } \right .\ ] ] where @xmath300 indicates outer - boundary values . upon trying both forms , we get similar results . therefore , we use the simpler form involving the cell - center potential : @xmath301 . because our discrete hydrodynamics equations including gravity do not give strict energy conservation , we use the core - collapse simulation ( [ section : corecollapse ] ) to gauge how well energy is conserved . rather than measuring the relative error in total energy by @xmath302 , where @xmath303 , @xmath304 is the initial total energy , and @xmath305 is the total energy at timestep @xmath59 , we use @xmath306 . for stellar profiles , the kinetic energy is small and the internal and gravitational energies are nearly equal in magnitude , but opposite in sign . since the total energy is roughly zero in comparison to the primary constituents , @xmath286 and @xmath288 , of the total energy , we use the gravitational potential energy as a reference . for example , the internal and gravitational energies start at @xmath307 erg and reach @xmath308 ergs at the end of the run . however , the total energy is a small fraction of these energies initially , @xmath309 , and after core bounce , @xmath310 . hence , we measure the relative error in total energy as @xmath306 . the total energy for the 1d and 2d core - collapse simulations evolve similarly and is conserved quite well . for all times except a few milliseconds around bounce , total energy is conserved better than @xmath11 @xmath311 . during collapse , from 0 to 147 ms , the total energy deviates by only @xmath13 @xmath312 . over a span of 5 ms around bounce , @xmath313 ms , the total energy changes by @xmath12.2 @xmath314 . for 100s of milliseconds afterward , the relative error in the total energy reduces to @xmath17 @xmath312 . hence , for all but about 5 ms of a simulation that lasts many hundreds of milliseconds the relative error in total energy is better than @xmath11 @xmath315 . we include here several assessments of the 1d and 2d poisson solvers . first , we calculate , using the butterfly mesh , the potential for a homogeneous sphere and compare to the analytic solution . this tests overall accuracy and the ability of our solver to give spherically symmetric potentials when a non - spherical mesh is employed . similarly , we substantiate the algorithm s ability to produce aspherical potentials of homogeneous oblate spheroids . then , we verify that the hydrodynamics and gravity solvers give accurate results for stars in hydrostatic equilibrium , and for a dynamical problem , the goldreich - weber self - similar collapse @xcite . figure [ maclaurin_sphere ] compares the simulated and analytic solutions for a homogeneous sphere , having density @xmath316 g @xmath181 , and maximum radius @xmath317 cm . the analytic potential inside the sphere is @xmath318 , and the top panel of fig . [ maclaurin_sphere ] shows the relative difference of the analytic potential and the numerical solution , @xmath213 , as a function of radius . results for four resolutions of the butterfly mesh are shown : 2550 cells with an effective radial resolution @xmath319 0.02 cm ( blue ) ; 8750 cells with @xmath319 0.01 cm ( green ) ; 15,200 cells with @xmath319 0.006 cm ( yellow ) ; and 35,000 cells with @xmath320 0.005 cm ( red ) . two facts are obvious : 1 ) the solutions are accurate at a level of @xmath321 for @xmath322 and @xmath323 for @xmath324 ; and 2 ) the degree to which the solution is spherically symmetric is similarly a few times @xmath325 for @xmath322 and a few times @xmath326 for @xmath324 . plotting the minimum error as a function of the effective radial resolution , the bottom panel of fig . [ maclaurin_sphere ] verifies that the 2d poisson solver convergences with 2@xmath327-order accuracy ( solid line ) . next , we calculate the aspherical potential for an oblate spheroid . the homogeneous oblate spheroid has an elliptic meridional cross section , and the minor- and major - axes of the ellipse are @xmath328 and @xmath329 , where @xmath329 is the equatorial radius . thus , the eccentricity of the spheroid is @xmath330 . given a uniform density , @xmath331 , the potential for a spheroid is @xmath332 \right ) \ , , \ ] ] where , for oblate spheroids , @xmath333 \frac{(1 - e^2)^{1/2}}{e^2 } \ , , \ ] ] @xmath334 \frac{(1 - e^2)^{1/2}}{e^2 } \ , , \ ] ] and @xmath335 @xcite . numerical results with @xmath336 are shown in fig . [ maclaurin_spheroid ] . as with the sphere , @xmath337 g @xmath181 and @xmath317 cm . however , for the given eccentricity , the polar - axis radius , @xmath328 , is 0.6 cm . once again , the grid is a butterfly mesh , but this time the outer boundary follows the ellipse defining the surface of the spheroid . the top panel of fig . [ maclaurin_spheroid ] presents the spheroid s potential , and the degree of accuracy is presented in the bottom plot . with @xmath338 and @xmath322 , the relative error in the potential ranges from @xmath339 near the outer boundary to @xmath321 in interior regions . conspicuous are features in the relative error that track abrupt grid orientation changes in the mesh . fortunately , these features have magnitudes smaller than or similar to the relative error in the local region . the relative error in the gravitational acceleration magnitude , latexmath:[$(|\vec{g}_p| - @xmath1@xmath341 to @xmath1@xmath326 , where @xmath342 is the analytic acceleration and @xmath343 is the maximum magnitude on the grid . typical errors in the acceleration direction range from @xmath1@xmath341 to @xmath1@xmath326 radians with rare deviations as large as @xmath1@xmath344 radians near the axis and abrupt grid orientation changes . in fig . [ laneemden_plot ] , we demonstrate that the ale algorithm in combination with our gravity solver produces reasonably accurate hydrostatic equilibria . the grid is the butterfly mesh with 8750 zones , and the initial model is a lane - emden polytrope with @xmath345 , @xmath346 m@xmath347 , and @xmath348 cm . crosses show the density profile at @xmath349 s , while the solid line shows the maximum density as a function of time and that the star pulsates . these oscillations result from the slight difference between an analytic hydrostatic equilibrium structure and a discretized hydrostatic equilibrium structure , and with increasing resolution , they decrease in magnitude . interestingly , the oscillations continue for many cycles with very little attenuation . simulating the goldreich - weber self - similar collapse @xcite in 1d and 2d is a good test of dynamic simulations including gravity . the analytic profile is similar to a lane - emden polytrope with @xmath350 , and in fact , we use the gamma - law eos with @xmath351 . while the lane - emden polytropes are assumed to be in hydrostatic equilibrium , the goldreich - weber self - similar collapse has a homologous velocity profile and a self - similar density profile . the physical dimensions have been scaled so that @xmath352 m@xmath347 , the initial central density is @xmath353 g @xmath181 , and the maximum radius of the profile is @xmath354 cm . for the 1d simulation , we initiate the grid with 200 evenly - spaced zones , and for 2d , a butterfly mesh with 35,000 zones ( effectively with 200 radial zones ) is used to initiate the grid . subsequent evolution for both simulations uses the lagrangian configuration . figure [ gwplot ] shows snapshots of density vs. radius for 1d ( top panel ) and 2d ( bottom panel ) simulations at @xmath3550 , 20 , 40 , 60 , 80 , 100 , 120 , and 130 ms . both plots indicate that the simulations ( crosses ) track the analytic solution ( solid lines ) . quantitatively , we measure a relative difference , @xmath356 , for the reported times , where @xmath357 are the simulated cell - center densities and @xmath358 are the analytic values . consistently , the largest deviations are at the center and table [ table : gw ] gives these values for the 1d simulation ( 2@xmath0 column ) and the 2d simulation ( 3@xmath359 column ) . the relative differences range from @xmath360 at 0 ms to @xmath361 at 130 ms for the 1d simulation and @xmath362 at 0 ms to @xmath363 at 130 ms for the 2d simulation . at all times , the departure from spherical symmetry is no more than @xmath364 . boundary conditions are implemented in one of two ways . either an external pressure is specified or the velocities at the nodes are fixed . for external pressures , ghost cells are defined that have no true volume or mass associated with them . their only function is to apply an external force to the boundary cells equal to an external pressure times the boundary surface area . specifying nodal velocities on the boundary accomplishes the same task . in this case , there is an implied external force and pressure . in practice , generic dynamical boundaries use the external pressure boundary condition . on the other hand , pistons , reflecting walls , and the azimuthal axis have the velocity perpendicular to the boundary specified , while the parallel component executes unhindered hydrodynamic motions . to resolve shocks over just a few zones , we include artificial viscosity in the equations of hydrodynamics . for 1d simulations , we add a viscous - like term to the pressure @xcite . we denote this viscous pressure by @xmath365 . the original realization of @xmath365 employed one term proportional to @xmath366 , where @xmath367 is the difference in velocity from one zone to the next . while this form adequately resolved shocks , unphysical oscillations were observed in the post - shock flow . a second term , linear in @xmath367 , was then added that effectively damped these oscillations @xcite . another form which we employ for our 1d simulations is @xmath368 where @xmath369 is the sound speed , @xmath370 is the parameter associated with the linear term , and @xmath371 is the parameter associated with the quadratic term . this form has the appealing attribute that it is motivated by the expression for the shock - jump condition for pressure in an ideal gas @xcite . for 2d simulations , the artificial viscosity scheme we have settled upon is the tensor artificial viscosity algorithm of @xcite . here , we do not re - derive the artificial viscosity scheme , but highlight some of its salient features and practical implementations . the useful feature of the tensor algorithm is its ability to calculate artificial viscosity on an arbitrary grid , while suppressing artificial grid buckling when the flow is not aligned with the grid . in the strictest sense , the tensor artificial viscosity does not employ the simple viscous pressure described above . instead , @xcite assume that the artificial viscosity tensor is a combination of a scalar coefficient , @xmath372 and the gradient of the velocity tensor , @xmath373 . therefore , references to the parameters @xmath370 and @xmath371 in 1d and 2d refer to the same linear or quadratic dependence on @xmath374 . with this assumption , the momentum equation , eq . ( [ eq : mom_lag ] ) , becomes @xmath375 and the energy equation , eq . ( [ eq : ene_lag ] ) , is @xmath376 where @xmath377 , using the normal einstein summation convention . with the method of support operators , @xcite derive discrete forms of these equations . analogous to the gradient of the pressure term , the discrete artificial viscosity term in the momentum equation becomes a summation of corner forces , @xmath378 and the corresponding term in the energy equation is the usual force - dot - velocity summation : @xmath379 therefore , implementation of the artificial viscosity scheme is straightforward and similar to that for the pressure forces . in practice , this artificial viscosity scheme is formulated for cartesian coordinates , and to obtain the equivalent force for cylindrical coordinates , we multiply the cartesian subcell force by @xmath81 . in general , this works quite well , but sacrifices strict momentum conservation ( see [ section : momcons ] ) . a problem that can plague lagrangian codes using cells with 4 or more sides is the unphysical hourglass mode @xcite . to suppress this problem , we employ a modified version of the subcell pressure algorithm of @xcite . for all physical modes ( translation , shear , and extension / contraction ) the divergences of the velocity on the subcell and cell levels are equal , @xmath380 hence , as long as the calculation is initiated such that the subcell densities of a cell are equal to the cell - averaged density , then they should remain equal at all subsequent times . any deviation of the subcell density from the cell density , @xmath381 , is a direct result of the hourglass mode . the scheme of @xcite uses this deviation in subcell density to define a subcell pressure that is related to the deviation in subcell and cell density , @xmath382 , by @xmath383 with the corresponding deviation in pressure : @xmath384 . application of these pressures as subcell forces counteracts the hourglass distortion . however , the pressure throughout the cell is no longer uniform . as a result , the subcell pressures exert forces on the cell centers and mid - edge points . these locations in the grid are not subject to physical forces as are the nodes . instead , their movement is tied to the motions of the nodes . to conserve momentum , the forces acting on these enslaved points must be redistributed to the dynamical nodes . though the choice of redistribution is not unique , we follow the procedure established by @xcite for the form of the subcell force ( for the definitions of @xmath41 and @xmath43 , see [ section : coords_mesh ] and fig . [ fig : grid ] . ) : @xmath385 \ , .\ ] ] this particular scheme works quite well for lagrangian calculations . however , it can be incompatible with subcell remapping algorithms . the hourglass suppression scheme described above assumes that only hourglass motions result in nonzero values for @xmath382 . even in calculations that are completely free of hourglass motions , the subcell remapping scheme can and will produce subcell densities within a cell that are different from the cell density . since this difference of subcell and cell densities has nothing to do with hourglass motions , any subcell forces that arise introduce spurious motions that do nt correct the hourglass motions . investigating several alternative schemes , we settled on a modification of the @xcite approach . after each remap , we define a tracer density whose only purpose is to track the relative changes in the subcell and cell volumes during the subsequent hydrodynamic solve . for convenience , and to keep the magnitude of the subcell pressures about right , we set the subcell tracer density equal to the cell density . after replacing @xmath382 with the difference between the subcell tracer density and the cell density , @xmath386 , we proceed with the scheme prescribed by @xcite . we have found that the subcell forces of @xcite significantly resist hourglass motions only after @xmath382 achieves significant magnitude . for our new hourglass scheme , if a remap is implemented after each hydrodynamic solve , @xmath386 does not have a chance to achieve large values , and hence , the subsequent subcell forces are not very resistant to hourglass distortions . however , for many simulations , we have found that it is not necessary to remap after every lagrangian hydrodynamic solve . rather , the remap may be performed after @xmath387 timesteps . in these circumstances , the subcell tracer density is allowed to evolve continuously as determined by the hydrodynamic equations . with large @xmath387 , @xmath386 does develop significant amplitude and the subcell forces become effective in suppressing the hourglass modes . in fact , in the limit that @xmath388 , this scheme becomes the hourglass suppression scheme of @xcite . in practice , we multiply this subcell force by a scaling factor . to determine the appropriate magnitude of this scaling factor , we executed many test problems and found that problems that involved the perturbation of hydrostatic equilibrium provide a good test of the robustness of the hourglass fix . during the testing protocol , we ran a simulation for at least 200,000 timesteps , ensuring that the hourglass fix remains robust for long calculations . for lagrangian calculations , a scaling factor @xmath389 produced reasonable results . for runs in which remapping occurred after @xmath387 timesteps , we found that larger values of the scaling factor were required . however , for very large values of @xmath387 , such as 64 or greater , such large values compromised small structures in the flow . hence , we settled on scaling factors near 1 for large @xmath387 . for small @xmath387 , we found that the difference in tracer density and the cell - centered density had little time to build to significant amplitudes , so larger values of the scaling factor are required , but anything above 4 produced noticeable problems in flows with many timesteps . in summary , the scaling factor should be adjusted to be @xmath389 for large @xmath387 and @xmath390 for small @xmath387 . to demonstrate the need for an hourglass suppression scheme , and that our algorithm to address the hourglass distortions works , we show in fig . [ gw_fmerit_comp ] results for the goldreich - weber self - similar collapse in 2d ( [ section : gravity_tests ] ) , with and without the hourglass suppression ( [ section : hourglass ] ) . these results represent a lagrangian simulation of the self - similar collapse at @xmath391 ms . on the left ( `` @xmath392 '' ) the grid clearly shows problematic grid buckling when the hourglass suppression is turned off . the grid on the right ( `` @xmath393 '' ) shows the elimination of grid buckling with the use of the hourglass suppression scheme and a scaling factor of 2.0 . figure [ rt_stills_fmerit ] illustrates the problem of using the hourglass suppression scheme of @xcite in combination with the subcell remapping algorithm ( [ section : remap ] ) . all three panels show the results of the single - mode rayleigh - taylor instability at @xmath394 s. for the left panel , no hourglass suppression is employed . this panel represents our control . while the hourglass instability does not cause serious problems for the calculation , one can see evidence of slight hourglass patterns at the scale of the grid resolution . in particular , two blobs near the top and on the edges form distinct patterns . the central panel demonstrates the problem of using the subcell remapping scheme and the subcell pressure method of @xcite . on the other hand , the right panel demonstrates that the modified subpressure scheme we have developed suppresses the hourglass distortions , while preserving the expected flow . fluid flows with large vorticity quickly tangle a lagrangian mesh , presenting severe problems for lagrangian hydrodynamic codes . to avoid entangled grids , it is common to remap the state variables after each lagrangian hydrodynamic advance to another less tangled mesh . even flows that exhibit very little vorticity , but extreme compression or expansion along a particular direction , leading to very skewed cells , can limit the accuracy of lagrangian calculations . in this case as well , one can employ a remapping scheme which is designed to minimize the calculational error . to remap , a new grid must be established . one choice is to remap to the original grid , thereby effectively solving the hydrodynamics equations on an eulerian mesh . another is to use a reference jacobian matrix rezone strategy , which establishes a new mesh close to the lagrangian mesh , while reducing numerical error by reducing unnecessarily skewed zones . the arbitrary nature of the remapping algorithm even allows the freedom of choosing one rezoning scheme in one sector of the grid and another rezoning scheme in other sectors . for example , one could remap in an eulerian fashion in one sector , let the grid move in a lagrangian manner in another , and in the intervening region smoothly match these two regions . generally , there are two options for remapping schemes . one can remap from one arbitrary grid to another completely unrelated arbitrary grid . for these unrelated grids , one needs to determine the overlap of the zones of the first grid with the zones of the second . in general , this can be a very cumbersome and expensive process . as a result most ale codes , remap to an arbitrary grid that is not too different from the first . specifically , the usual stipulation employed is that the face of each cell does not traverse more than one cell during a timestep , and that the connectivity among nodes , faces , edges , and cells remains the same from the first grid to the remapped grid . the regions swept by the faces then contain the mass , momentum , or energy which is added to the cell on one side of the face and subtracted from the cell on the other side . it is in this context that we use the swept - region remapping algorithms of @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite . this remapping scheme may be described by four stages : 1 . the first is the gathering stage . this is a stage in which subcell quantities of the mass , momenta , and energies are defined in preparation for the bulk of the remapping process . 2 . the second is to remap the subcell quantities from the lagrangian grid to the new rezoned grid using the swept - region approximation . in doing so , the remapping algorithm remains 2nd - order accurate , but avoids time intensive routines to calculate the overlap regions of the old and new grids . 3 . the third is to repair the subcell densities . because exact spatial integration is avoided with the swept - region approximation , local bounds of subcell densities may be violated . therefore , a repair algorithm which redistributes mass , momentum , and energies to preserve the local bounds is implemented . finally , there is the scattering stage , in which the primary variables of the hydrodynamics algorithm are recovered for the new rezoned grid . in order to remap the primary quantities using the subcell remapping algorithm , mass , momenta , internal energy , and kinetic energy must be defined at the subcell level . in the lagrangian stage , the subcell mass , @xmath47 , is already defined . the subcell density which is a consequence of the change in the subcell volume ( @xmath33 ) during the lagrangian hydro step is @xmath395 unfortunately , there is no equivalent quantity for the subcell internal energy . instead , we define the internal energy density for each zone , @xmath396 , fit a linear function for the internal energy density , @xmath397 , and integrate this function over the volume of each subcell to determine the total subcell internal energy and , consequently , the average subcell internal energy density : @xmath398 performing the integration of eq . ( [ eq : gather_energy ] ) involves a volume integral and volume integrals weighted by @xmath19 and @xmath20 in cartesian coordinates or @xmath21 and @xmath24 in cylindrical coordinates ( see appendix [ section : integrals ] for formulae calculating these discrete integrals ) . note , that , by construction , these newly defined internal energies satisfy conservation of internal energy for each zone , @xmath399 . similarly , there are no readily defined subcell - centered averages for the momenta , @xmath400 , or velocities , @xmath401 . however , they should be related to one another by @xmath402 if the gathering stage is to preserve momentum conservation , then the following equality must hold : @xmath403 by inspection , it might seem natural to set @xmath404 . however , we follow the more accurate suggestion made by @xcite to define the subcell - averaged velocity as follows : @xmath405 where @xmath406 is obtained by averaging over all nodal velocities associated with zone @xmath24 , and @xmath407 and @xmath408 are edge - averaged velocities given by @xmath409 and @xmath410 . substituting eq . ( [ eq : subcellvel ] ) into eq . ( [ eq : momconssubcell ] ) and rearranging terms , we get an expression for the subcell velocity that depends on known subcell masses and nodal velocities : @xmath411 we now rewrite eq . ( [ eq : vsubcellexplicit1 ] ) in a form that obviously makes it easy to write the gathering operation in matrix form : @xmath412 if @xmath413 is a vector of one component of all velocities associated with cell @xmath24 , and @xmath414 is the equivalent for subcell velocities , then @xmath415 where the matrix , @xmath416 , for each zone is given by the coefficients in eq . ( [ eq : vsubcellexplicit ] ) . to conserve total energy in the remap stage , we define the subcell kinetic energy and follow the same gather procedure as for the velocity by simply replacing velocity with the specific kinetic energy : @xmath417 we ensure conservation of total kinetic energy for a cell : @xmath418 where @xmath419 is the subcell - averaged specific kinetic energy . then , the transformation from nodal specific kinetic energies to subcell - averaged specific kinetic energies is given by @xmath420 where @xmath421 is a vector of the subcell - averaged specific kinetic energies , @xmath422 is a vector of the nodal specific kinetic energies , and @xmath416 is the same transformation matrix used for the velocity transformations . having found the specific kinetic energies , the calculation of the kinetic energy for each subcell is then straightforward : @xmath423 . upon completion of the gathering stage , each relevant quantity , @xmath47 , @xmath400 , @xmath424 , and @xmath425 , is expressed as a fundamentally conserved quantity for each subcell . from these conserved quantities and the subcell volumes , we have the corresponding densities , which , as is explained in [ section : swept ] , are important components of the remapping process . having gathered all relevant subcell quantities , we begin the bulk of the remapping process . since all variables are now expressed in terms of a conserved quantity ( subcell mass , energy , and momentum ) and a density ( mass density , energy density , and momentum density ) , for clarity of exposition , we focus on representative variables , subcell mass and density , to explain the generic remapping algorithm . when there are differences in the algorithm for the other variables , we note them . we have instituted the remapping algorithm of @xcite . to avoid the expensive process of finding the overlap of the lagrangian grid with the rezoned grid , this algorithm modifies the mass of each subcell with a swept - edge approximation for the rezoning process . as long as the connectivity and neighborhood for each cell remain the same throughout the calculation , time spent in connectivity overhead is greatly reduced . the objective of the remapping algorithm is then to find the amount of mass , @xmath426 , that each edge effectively sweeps up due to the rezoning process and to add or subtract this change in mass to the old subcell mass to obtain the new subcell mass , @xmath427 : @xmath428 of course , the change in mass is obtained by integration of a density function over the volume of the swept region : @xmath429 the density function , @xmath430 , may take on any functional form . to maintain second - order accuracy of the algorithm we use a linear density function ; @xmath431 where @xmath432 is the average of the nodal positions defining the subcell . in determining the gradient , @xmath433 , we employ one of two standard methods for calculating the gradient using the densities from subcell @xmath143 and its neighbors . the first method uses green s theorem to rewrite a bounded volume integral as a boundary integral around the same volume . we begin with a definition of the average gradient of @xmath6 for a given region . for each component , the average gradient is @xmath434 where @xmath435 and @xmath436 are the gradients in the x- and y - directions , respectively . the region over which the integrals are evaluated is defined by segments connecting the centers of the neighboring subcells . hence , the discrete form of the average gradient is @xmath437 while this method works reasonably well , an unfortunate consequence of the integration and division by volume is that the value of the gradient is directly influenced by the shape and size of the cell . an alternative method for determining gradients , which is not as easily influenced by the shape of the mesh , is a least - squares procedure . for simplicity of notation , we describe this method in the context of cells rather than subcells . again , assuming a linear form for @xmath438 , we seek to minimize the difference between @xmath439 and @xmath440 , where @xmath439 is the neighbor s value and @xmath440 is the extrapolation of cell @xmath24 s linear function to the position of the neighbor , @xmath441 . more explicitly , we wish to minimize the following equation : @xmath442 where the set of neighbors for cell @xmath24 is denoted by @xmath443 , @xmath444 @xmath445 and @xmath446 are the @xmath19 and @xmath20 components of the gradient , @xmath447 , @xmath448 , @xmath449 , and @xmath450 . minimizing eq . ( [ eq : least_eq1 ] ) with respect to the two unknowns , leads to the following set of linear equations : @xmath451 for each subcell , where @xmath452 solving this linear system with cramer s rule then gives the least - squares gradients . after calculating the gradient we ensure monotonicity using the barth - jespersen limiter @xcite . the gradient is limited by a scalar , @xmath213 , that has a range between 0 and 1 : @xmath453 first , we determine the minimum and maximum value of @xmath6 among @xmath357 and its neighbors @xmath439 : @xmath454 @xmath455 we satisfy the requirement that @xmath456 this is accomplished in the following way . @xmath457 where @xmath458 is a limiter associated with each node of the cell and is given by @xmath459 where @xmath460 is the unlimited linear function evaluated at the nodes . with the linear function @xmath461 defined for each subcell , we return to the task of determining the swept mass , @xmath426 . the specific linear function @xmath461 for density used in eq . ( [ eq : swept_eq2 ] ) depends upon which subcell the edge encroaches upon . in fact , it is quite possible that the volume swept by the edge intersects more than one immediate neighbor of the subcell in question . of course , an accurate swept - edge integration scheme would take into account all spatial functions in the relevant subcells . @xcite , and references therein , have noted that such an accurate scheme may be cumbersome and computational expensive . instead , they suggest an approximate swept region integration in which only the subcells to the left and right of the oriented edge need matter in determining the spatial function of density used for integration . to this end , an oriented volume integral is defined : @xmath462 whether this volume integral is negative or positive , the density function is taken from either the left or right subcell : @xmath463 while the above scheme is second - order accurate and mass conserving , the approximations made in the swept - edge algorithm can violate local bounds . in practice , the values of the remapped densities should be bounded by the neighborhood values of the original grid . computationally expensive schemes that find the overlap regions among the old and new grid can be made to preserve the bounds . however , the local bounds can be violated in swept - edge remapping . using the linearity - and - bound - preserving method of @xcite , we conservatively repair quantities by redistributing mass , energy , momenta , and number to neighbors satisfying the local bounds of the quantities on the previous lagrangian grid . however , the order in which one processes the cells and subcells influences the specific values that emerge from the repair process . therefore , we employ the order independent scheme of @xcite . these repair schemes are designed to repair subcell densities . for velocities and composition we wish to preserve the bounds of @xmath7 and @xmath13 . therefore , we have appropriately adjusted the scheme to conservatively repair momenta and particle number by preserving the local bounds of @xmath7 and @xmath13 , respectively . the final remap step is to recover the primary variables for the next hydrodynamic step . the new cell - centered and node - centered masses are @xmath464 and @xmath465 respectively . consequently , the subcell and cell - averaged densities are @xmath466 and @xmath467 respectively . recovering the velocities at the nodes is slightly more involved . first , the new subcell - averaged velocity is defined using the remapped momenta and masses : @xmath468 then , for each cell we invert the matrix equation that transforms node velocities into subcell velocities : @xmath469 in this scheme , each cell provides its own velocity for a node , which may be different from another cell s value for the same node . therefore , for each node velocity , we average node velocities resulting from the inversion of eq . ( [ eq : vmatrix ] ) : @xmath470 finally , we recover the specific internal energy . comparing the sum of the old internal energy and kinetic energy with the sum of remapped internal energy and a kinetic energy defined by the remapped node velocities will not necessarily ensure conservation of total energy . therefore , the old kinetic energy is remapped along with the node velocities . the discrepancy between these two kinetic energy representations is then added to the internal energy , ensuring conservation of total energy during the remap stage : @xmath471 \ , .\ ] ] the new cell - centered specific internal energy is then obtained using the modified internal energy , @xmath472 , and the remapped mass , @xmath473 : @xmath474 this ensures conservation of total energy at the expense of consistent remapping of internal energy . whichever is desirable depends upon the problem . for example , in flows with large kinetic energies and small internal energies , the discrepancy in kinetic energy remapping could substantially alter or even dominate the internal energy . consequently , we include a flag in bethe - hydro that determines whether the remapped kinetic energy differences are added to the internal energy . figure [ rhoremap_step ] demonstrates the basic effectiveness of the remapping algorithm . we remap a 1d step function in density many times . from @xmath475 to @xmath476 cm , the density is @xmath477 g @xmath181 , and from @xmath478 to @xmath479 cm , the density is @xmath480 g @xmath181 . this test has 50 cells and @xmath481 nodes . indexing each node by @xmath14 , the positions of the nodes are @xmath482 where @xmath483 and the remapping step is @xmath59 . as a result , the grid completes two full cycles in this remapping test . figure [ rhoremap_step ] shows the result of this remapping test where @xmath484 . the top panel displays the density profile for remapping steps 0 to @xmath485 , while the bottom panel shows the profile for steps @xmath485 to @xmath486 . comparison of the first half ( top panel ) with the second half ( bottom panel ) indicates that the remapping process diffuses the discontinuity over a small number ( @xmath14 ) of zones initially , and `` diffusion '' slows substantially after the initial phase , maintaining a somewhat consistent width in the discontinuity . barring any nuclear or chemical transformations , the composition equation , eq . ( [ eq : advec ] ) , states that @xmath13 is conserved . the lagrangian hydro portion of our algorithm will not change a cell s composition . all alterations in composition are , therefore , a result of advection , and in an ale code advection is handled by the remapping algorithm . equation ( [ eq : advec ] ) may be written in eulerian form : @xmath487 which implies a close dependence of the advection of @xmath13 on @xmath6 and @xmath7 . in practice , if the composition is not advected in a manner entirely consistent with the advection of mass , then the advection of composition will develop peculiarities . since the remapping of density is truly a remapping of the subcell masses , we have designed a scheme for the remapping of composition which operates on an equivalent subcell quantity . specifically , we define new lagrangian quantities for composition . they are the number of species @xmath14 in the cell , @xmath488 , and the number of species @xmath14 in the subcell , @xmath489 . analogous to the mass density is the number density , @xmath490 and @xmath491 . these new quantities are related to the previously defined quantities by : @xmath492 and @xmath493 or @xmath494 . the remap ( or advection ) of composition follows the scheme outlined for the advection of mass on the subcell level , with @xmath495 replacing @xmath6 and @xmath496 replacing mass . the new compositions are then determined by @xmath497 . the final minor , but crucial , difference between mass and composition remapping occurs during the repair process . while the repair process maintains the bounds on the number density , we also enforce bound preservation of the compositions . while we do not address specific rate equations in this work , transport and nuclear processes will require consideration of nonzero terms on the rhs of eqs . ( [ eq : advec ] ) and ( [ eq : advec_eulerian ] ) . since our division of composition into subcell compositions has consequences for discrete implementations with rates , we include here some discussion . normally , the discrete form of eq . ( [ eq : advec ] ) with a nonzero rhs would be designed to operate at the cell level . in other words , it would involve @xmath498 and @xmath499 . however , the fundamental lagrangian subunit is the subcell . therefore , we have developed an algorithm to handle the composition changes , @xmath500 , at the subcell level due to changes at the cell level . irrespective of the scheme employed , a condition which must be satisfied is that @xmath501 we d like to convert the statement of number conservation into the more useful relationship : @xmath502 when the change in composition due to the rates is applied in operator - split form to the discrete hydro equations , we have the following relations : @xmath503 and @xmath504 our dilemma is that the rate equations will determine @xmath505 , but they put no constraint on @xmath506 . a fairly natural and simple choice is @xmath507 , giving @xmath508 substituting eq . ( [ eq : deltansubcell ] ) into eq . ( [ eq : deltancell ] ) we have @xmath509 hence , by simply stating that @xmath507 , we have developed discrete rate equations that satisfy conservation of species number and operates at the subcell level . the remap of the angular momentum deserves special mention . as in mass remapping , we try to find new subcell angular momenta , @xmath510 , based upon an approximate swept - region approach . in other words , @xmath511 which parallels eq . ( [ eq : swept_eq1 ] ) in form . a notable difference , however , is the expression for the swept angular momentum . it no longer involves a simple volume integral , but an integral weighted by @xmath512 ( see appendix [ section : integrals ] for calculating the discrete analog of this integral ) : @xmath513 after finding the new subcell angular momentum we determine the new cell angular momentum , @xmath514 and node angular momentum , @xmath515 and in turn determine the new angular velocity ; @xmath516 in this section , we characterize bethe - hydro s performance using several test problems . first , we demonstrate that this code produces 2@xmath0-order accurate solutions for self - gravitating flows . to assess the accuracy of high mach - number simulations , we use the sod shock tube problem , sedov blast wave , and noh implosion problem , which all have analytic solutions . furthermore , we simulate the saltzman and dukowicz piston problems to test the code s ability to simulate piston - driven shocks using oblique meshes . in simulating two important hydrodynamic instabilities , the rayleigh - taylor and kelvin - helmholtz instabilities , we further demonstrate this code s strengths and limitations . demonstrating bethe - hydro s ability to simulate astrophysical phenomena , we conclude with a core - collapse supernova simulation . to verify the 2@xmath517-order character of bethe - hydro , a smooth hydrodynamics flow is required . the goldreich - weber self - similar collapse ( see [ section : gravity_tests ] and fig . [ gwplot ] ) satisfies this requirement and is ideal to check convergence of the hydrodynamic and gravity solvers and their coupling . we use @xmath518-norms of the error : @xmath519 where the error is @xmath520 , @xmath358 is the analytic density at @xmath521 ms , @xmath522 is the zone size , and @xmath523 is 1 for 1d and 2 for 2d . strictly speaking , the simulations are lagrangian and have time - varying zone sizes . fortunately , this collapse problem is self - similar , implying a direct correlation between the starting resolution and the resolution at a later time . therefore , we use the initial zone size in eq . ( [ eq : l1norm ] ) and in fig . [ gw_resstudy ] . the @xmath518-norm as a function of @xmath524 ( crosses ) is plotted in fig . [ gw_resstudy ] . as the figure demonstrates , both 1d simulations ( top panel ) and 2d simulations ( bottom panel ) converge with roughly 2@xmath517-order accuracy . the sod shock tube problem is a standard analytic test that assesses the code s ability to simulate three characteristic waves : a shock , a rarefaction wave , and a contact discontinuity . a simple gamma - law eos is employed with @xmath525 . initially , the computational domain is divided into left and right static regions with different densities and pressures . specifically , the left and right regions have densities of 1.0 g @xmath181 and @xmath526 g @xmath181 and pressures of 1.0 erg @xmath181 and 0.1 erg @xmath181 , respectively . this gives rise to a self - similar solution involving a shock propagating to the right , a rarefaction wave propagating to the left , and a contact discontinuity in between . in fig . [ sodplot ] , we display the sod shock tube test results for 1d lagrangian , 1d eulerian , 2d lagrangian , and 2d eulerian configurations . cell - centered densities and locations are marked with plus signs , while the analytic results are denoted by solid dark lines . the 1d lagrangian result shows the appropriate density profile , while the other profiles have been shifted vertically so that distinguishing features are more easily compared . in addition , the profiles are further distinguished by displaying them at different times : 1d lagrangian ( @xmath527 s ) , 1d eulerian ( @xmath528 s ) , 2d lagrangian ( @xmath529 s ) , and 2d eulerian ( @xmath530 s ) . the 1d calculations are resolved with 400 zones . similarly , the 2d tests are resolved along the direction of shock propagation with 400 zones , and they are resolved in the perpendicular direction by 10 zones . the overall features of the shock , post - shock material , contact discontinuity , and rarefaction wave are reproduced . for all scenarios , the shock is resolved within a few zones . for the 1d eulerian and lagrangian calculations the post - shock density is good to @xmath531% and @xmath532% , respectively . upon viewing the profiles in greater detail , there is a noticeable departure from the analytic solution at the tail of the rarefaction wave where the density dips below the expected value . this error in density at the tail of the rarefaction wave is @xmath533% for the lagrangian simulation and @xmath389% for the eulerian simulation . since the contact discontinuity moves with the flow speed , both lagrangian calculations resolve the contact discontinuity exactly from one zone to the next and maintain this resolution throughout the simulation . the eulerian calculations , not surprisingly , distribute the contact discontinuity over several ( @xmath14 ) zones . a classic test , the sedov blast wave problem provides a quantitative measure of a code s ability to simulate spherical explosions . initial conditions are set so that the total energy of the sedov blast is 0.244816 ergs , @xmath534 g @xmath181 , @xmath535 ergs g@xmath186 , and the gamma - law eos has @xmath345 . we compare the simulations with the analytic result ( solid lines ) for the following scenarios : 1d lagrangian , 1d eulerian , 2d lagrangian using the butterfly mesh , and 2d lagrangian using the spiderweb mesh . results of the sedov explosion are plotted in fig . [ sedovplot ] . the top panel compares the analytic and numerical density profiles , while the bottom panel shows the relative differences between the numerical solutions and the analytic profile . to easily distinguish different runs and details , we plot the 1d lagrangian calculation at @xmath536 s , the 1d eulerian at @xmath537 s , the 2d lagrangian using the butterfly mesh at @xmath538 s , and the 2d lagrangian using the spiderweb mesh at @xmath539 s. the 1d calculations are resolved with 400 zones . the spiderweb test has a total of 12,381 zones with 200 radial zones and a maximum of 64 angular zones , while the butterfly mesh has a total of 35,000 zones with effectively 200 radial and 200 angular zones . qualitatively , all simulations reproduce the overall structure and position of the shock and post - shock flows . there are some practical issues about formulating the sedov runs that are worth mentioning . for the 1d simulations , we found that simply placing the initial explosion energy in a small number of inner zones was adequate . on the other hand , the 2d simulations using non - spherical grids required more care . simply depositing all the energy within a small number of zones near the center led to severe grid tangling and distortions . we remedied this by initiating all profiles with the analytic solution at @xmath540 s. the bottom panel of fig . [ sedovplot ] emphasizes the quantitative accuracy of the post - shock solutions . plotted are the relative errors of the density , @xmath541 , versus radius , where @xmath6 is the simulated density profile , @xmath358 is the analytic profile , and @xmath542 is the maximum density of the analytic profile . the 1d lagrangian simulation gives the best results with a maximum relative error near the shock of @xmath543% . in comparison , the 1d eulerian test gives @xmath390% deviation near the shock . the 2d lagrangian simulation using the spiderweb mesh has a maximum deviation similar to the 1d lagrangian simulation , even though the 1d simulation has radial zones with half the zone size . the simulation using the spiderweb mesh shows some slight departure from spherical symmetry . specifically , for most of the post - shock region , the peak - to - peak variation of density is less than @xmath389% , and near the shock the peak - to - peak variation of density reaches @xmath544% . the 2d lagrangian simulation using the butterfly mesh has a maximum density deviation of @xmath390% near the shock and a deviation from spherical symmetry of similar magnitude . initial conditions for the noh problem are uniform density @xmath316 g @xmath181 , zero ( or very small ) internal energy @xmath545 ergs , a convergent velocity field with magnitude @xmath546 cm s@xmath186 , and a gamma - law eos with @xmath345 . subsequent evolution produces a symmetric self - similar flow including supersonic accretion , an accretion shock , and stationary post - shock matter in which kinetic energy has been converted into internal energy . the analytic solution for this problem is @xmath547 where @xmath548 is the velocity magnitude , the shock position is @xmath549 , the shock velocity is @xmath550 , and @xmath523 is 2 for 2d cartesian , 3 for 2d simulations using cylindrical coordinates , and 3 for 1d spherically symmetric simulations . in fig . [ noh1dres ] , we present the density profiles at @xmath527 s for 1d , spherically symmetric simulations of the noh problem using four resolutions . the initial grid spans the range @xmath551 cm and is evenly divided into 200 , 400 , 800 , and 1600 zones . the solid line is the analytic solution for @xmath552 . higher resolution simulations more accurately capture the shock position and the post - shock density profile . however , all resolutions depart significantly from the analytic solution near the center . this is `` wall heating '' and is a common problem for lagrangian schemes @xcite . the four panels of fig . [ nohplot_2d ] present the density profiles for 2d simulations . three of the four panels show the results using cartesian coordinates . the top - left panel shows the results using a cartesian grid with 100@xmath553200 zones , the top - right panel shows the results using the butterfly mesh with 22,400 zones , and the lower - left panel shows the results using the spiderweb mesh . the fourth panel , lower - right , shows the results using 2d cylindrical coordinates and a cartesian mesh with 100@xmath553200 zones . obvious is the fact that the mesh employed has consequences for the solution . both the top - left and bottom - right panels indicate that using the cartesian mesh for this problem produces fairly smooth results , with some asymmetry ( @xmath17% ) in the post - shock region . the lower - left panel shows that using the spiderweb mesh produces perfectly symmetric solutions except near the center where the deviation from symmetry is as large as @xmath125% . finally , simulations using the butterfly mesh , top - right panel , shows a similarly mixed capacity to preserve symmetry . in this light , it is important to choose a grid that minimizes numerical artifacts for the problem at hand . a task easily accomplished with the use of ale methods . a standard test for arbitrary grid codes , the saltzman piston problem @xcite addresses the ability of a code to simulate a simple piston - driven shock using a grid with mesh lines oblique to the shock normal . the top panel of fig . [ saltzman ] shows the grid with @xmath554 zones . for a grid with @xmath555 nodes within a domain defined by @xmath556 and @xmath557 , where @xmath558 and @xmath559 , the @xmath19 positions of the nodes are given by @xmath560 where @xmath561 and @xmath562 . at the piston , the left wall is moving at a constant velocity , 1.0 cm s@xmath186 , to the right . initially , the density and internal energy are set equal to 1.0 g @xmath181 and 0.0 ergs , respectively , and we use a gamma - law eos with @xmath345 . in the bottom panel of fig . [ saltzman ] , we show the grid and the density colormap at @xmath563 s after the shock has traversed the domain twice , reflecting off the right and left walls once . in this snapshot , the shock is traveling to the right . our results are to be compared with figs . 15 and 16 of @xcite . figure 15 of @xcite depicts a simulation with severe grid buckling , which we do not observe in our simulations . instead , our fig . [ saltzman ] shows reduced grid buckling and appropriate densities in accordance with the results of fig . 16 of @xcite . the dukowicz piston problem @xcite is another test using an oblique mesh . the initial setup involves two regions . region 1 has a density of 1 g @xmath181 and is resolved with @xmath564 zones . in the vertical domain , @xmath565 cm , and the mesh lines evenly partition the space into 120 sections . dividing region 1 horizontally involves mesh lines with changing orientation . the leftmost mesh line is parallel to the vertical , while the rightmost mesh line is oriented 60@xmath566 relative to the vertical . the mesh lines in between smoothly transition from 0@xmath566 to 60@xmath566 . region 2 has a density of 1.5 g @xmath181 and is gridded with a @xmath567 mesh , with the vertical mesh lines uniformly slanted at 60@xmath566 . including region 1 and region 2 , the bottom boundary spans the range @xmath568 cm and is evenly divided into 304 segments . initially , both regions are in equilibrium with @xmath569 erg @xmath181 . the top , bottom , and right boundaries are reflecting , and the left boundary is a piston with a velocity in the positive @xmath19 direction and a magnitude of 1.48 cm s@xmath186 ( see the top panel of fig . [ dukowicz ] for a low resolution example of this grid ) . a piston - driven shock travels from left to right , and encounters the density jump at an angle of 60@xmath566 , producing a rich set of phenomena . the incident shock continues into the lower density region , a transmitted / refracted shock propagates into the higher density region , a vortex sheet develops behind the transmitted shock , and a reflected shock propagates into the incident shock s post - shock flow ( see the labels in the bottom plot of fig . [ dukowicz ] for visual reference ) . the results are to be compared with the semi - analytic shock - polar analysis presented by @xcite ( see figure 13 and table i of @xcite ) . in their paper , angles subtended by the five regions are presented . in table [ table : dukowicz ] , we recast this information as the angles that the transmitted shock , vortex sheet , reflected shock , and incident shock have with @xmath19-axis . the first row gives the analytic values , which should be compared with the simulated orientations in the second row . strikingly , despite the fact that the incident shock has traversed a grid with an oblique mesh , the simulated and analytic orientations differ very little . the simulated and analytic reflected - shock orientations agree to within @xmath570% , and the orientations of the transmitted shock and vortex sheet agree to within 2% . here , we simulate the growth of a single mode of the rayleigh - taylor instability . a heavy fluid is placed on top of a lighter fluid in the presence of a constant gravitational acceleration . the top and bottom densities are @xmath571 g @xmath181 and @xmath572 g @xmath181 , respectively , and the gravitational acceleration points downward with magnitude @xmath573 cm s@xmath574 . the domain is a rectangle with @xmath575 cm and @xmath576 cm and @xmath577 grid zones . the top and bottom boundaries are reflecting while the left and right boundaries are periodic . for such configurations , small perturbations of the interface between the heavy and light fluids are unstable to exponential growth . assuming that the boundaries are far from the interface , the exponential growth rate of a perturbation with wavenumber @xmath578 is @xmath579 for all single - mode rayleigh - taylor simulations we initiate the perturbation by setting the vertical component of the velocity equal to @xmath580 , where the wavelength , @xmath581 , is @xmath582 cm . therefore , we simulate one wavelength of the mode , and the exponential growth rate ( @xmath583 ) should be 0.65 s@xmath186 . figure [ rt_stills_res ] shows the evolution of a single - mode rayleigh - taylor instability at @xmath394 s for four resolutions . from left to right , the grid sizes are @xmath584 , @xmath585 , @xmath577 , and @xmath586 . gross features compare well , with all the resolutions differing by only a few percent in the maximum and minimum position of the interface . however , higher resolution simulations manifest greater complexity for the kelvin - helmholtz rolls . one can compare the third panel to the results of fig . 4.5 of @xcite . in a general sense , these authors conclude that fewer features imply more dissipation . however , it could be that some of the kelvin - helmholtz rolls are seeded by grid noise in some schemes . next , we discuss the effects of artificial viscosity on the single - mode rayleigh - taylor flow . as stated in [ section : artificial_viscosity ] , artificial viscosity is a requirement for ale algorithms in order to simulate shocks . in the current formulation , there are two parameters of the artificial viscosity scheme . one parameter , @xmath587 , is the coefficient for @xmath588 , which is largest in shocks . effectively , this term provides shock resolution . the second parameter , @xmath370 , is the coefficient of the term that is proportional to @xmath589 and is designed to reduce the amount of post - shock ringing in the solution . typical values suggested for both are 1.0 @xcite . for the single - mode rayleigh - taylor test , the flows are subsonic , so the term multiplied by @xmath370 has the greatest impact on the magnitude of the artificial viscosity forces . each panel of fig . [ rt_stills_visc ] presents the nonlinear rayleigh - taylor flow after 12.75 s for different values of the artificial viscosity parameter , @xmath370 . clearly , @xmath590 ( left panel ) reproduces the expected results for this low - mach - number flow . on the other hand , the @xmath591 run ( center panel ) displays significant departures for the kelvin - helmholtz rolls , while the overall progression of the plumes remains similar . unfortunately , the model with @xmath592 ( right panel ) completely suppresses the kelvin - helmholtz rolls on these scales and plume progression is severely retarded . in fig . [ rt_linear ] , the interface perturbation amplitude is plotted as a function of time ( dashed lines ) . the solid line is the analytic exponential growth rate scaled to the simulation results . the dashed lines show the simulation results for viscosity parameters , @xmath370 , of 0.01 , 0.1 , and 1.0 . three distinct phases are apparent : an early transient phase , a phase in which the slope most closely matches the exponential growth rate , and the subsequent nonlinear phase . the simulations with @xmath590 and 0.1 manifest exponential growth for several e - folding times . the run with @xmath592 , on the other hand , seems to follow the linear phase for only 1 s ( @xmath1 1/2 e - folding ) , if at all . around 5 s , the evolution of the interface amplitude enters the nonlinear phase . for the artificial viscosity scheme that we employ , the rayleigh - taylor instability test indicates that lower values of @xmath370 are preferred . however , tests of the sod shock - tube problem including a parameter study of @xmath370 indicate that unwanted post - shock ringing is diminished only for values above @xmath593 . this represents the primary weakness of bethe - hydro to simulate flows with both shocks and rayleigh - taylor instabilities . to be clear , this does not represent a weakness of ale methods in general , but of the tensor artificial viscosity algorithm designed to mitigate the hourglass instability that we employ . other artificial viscosity schemes such as edge viscosity ( see @xcite for references ) allow for proper development of hydrodynamic instabilities , but do little to suppress the hourglass instability ( milan kucharik , private communication ) . of great interest to users of ale is a methodology that suppresses the hourglass instability and post - shock ringing while enabling proper evolution of hydrodynamic instabilities . another important phenomenon we explore is the kelvin - helmholtz shear instability . @xcite have shown that sph has trouble simulating the kelvin - helmholtz instability when extreme density contrasts are involved . we find that this instability is reasonably well handled in bethe - hydro , and that the evolution during the small amplitude regime is accurately characterized by analytic linear analysis . the calculational domain covers the square region bounded by @xmath594 cm and @xmath595 cm and has @xmath596 zones . the top and bottom boundaries are reflecting , while the left and right boundaries are periodic . for @xmath597 cm , @xmath598 g @xmath181 , and for @xmath599 cm , @xmath600 , where @xmath601 . these regions are in pressure equilibrium with @xmath602 erg @xmath181 . the shearing velocity , @xmath603 is scaled with respect to the slowest sound speed ( sound speed in the bottom region , @xmath604 ) . this relative shearing velocity is split between the top region , which flows to the left with speed @xmath605 , and the bottom region , which flows to the right with the same speed . for this test , the linear coefficient in the viscosity , @xmath370 , is set to 0.01 . a gamma - law eos is used with @xmath345 . the initial perturbation ( see agertz et al . 2007 ) is placed in a small band centered on the interface and is a perturbation in velocity given by @xmath606 where @xmath607 cm . it should be noted that this perturbation is not an eigenmode of the instability . therefore , simulations have a transient phase at the beginning in which this perturbation settles into one or more modes of the instability . we have found that using amplitudes suggested by @xcite , @xmath608 and 1/40 , produces strong transients that complicate the interpretation of the linear regime . to avoid strong long - lasting transients , we set @xmath609 . these initial conditions should produce a perturbation of the interface that grows exponentially in magnitude with an e - folding time given by @xmath610 for the simulations presented here , we consider two shearing velocities : @xmath611 cm s@xmath186 and @xmath612 cm s@xmath186 . hence , @xmath613 is 0.262 s and 0.523 s , respectively . the top panel of fig . [ kh_still ] shows the evolution at @xmath614 s for @xmath615 . the first set of nonlinear kelvin - helmholtz rolls have appeared . qualitatively , the morphology of the rolls is similar to the results presented in figure 13 . of @xcite labeled by `` grid 1 '' at @xmath616 ( there is a factor of @xmath617 difference in the definition of @xmath613 between our work and theirs ) . there are two main differences . for one , we simulate with a factor two larger wavelength to adequately resolve the wavelength for linear analysis . secondly , the time at which we present the results in the top panel of fig . [ kh_still ] corresponds to @xmath618 , not @xmath619 . we have noticed similar discrepancies in the time required to achieve similar evolution using @xmath620 and @xmath621 . additionally , we analyze the growth rate of the interface during the linear regime . we determine the interface amplitude by generating a contour for @xmath622 , measuring the peak to peak amplitude , and dividing by two . the bottom plot of fig . [ kh_still ] shows this amplitude ( solid line ) versus time and compares to the expected exponential growth ( dashed line ) for a simulation with @xmath623 ( green ) and @xmath624 ( blue ) . there are three distinct phases in the log - linear plot : an early transient phase , a phase in which the slope most closely matches the exponential growth rate , and the subsequent nonlinear phase . while the growth rate during the linear regime differs slightly ( @xmath110% ) from theory , the bottom panel of fig . [ kh_still ] demonstrates that the correct dependence of the growth rate on @xmath603 is obtained . incorporating all aspects of bethe - hydro , we simulate 1d and 2d hydrodynamic core - collapse of a 15 m@xmath347 star . we use the s15s7b2 model ( s15 ) of @xcite and the shen eos @xcite and initiate collapse using a @xmath625-@xmath6 parameterization @xcite . while there are no analytic solutions for such a test , we test to see whether the density profiles , timescales , and shock radii , etc . all match experience with other codes and results published @xcite . for 2d simulations , the grid is composed of a butterfly mesh in the interior with a minimum cell size of @xmath10.5 km and extends to 50 km where a spherical grid carries the domain out to 4000 km . in total , there are 23,750 cells , with an effective resolution of @xmath1250 radial and @xmath1100 angular zones . for the best comparison , the 1d grid has 250 zones , mimicking the effective radial resolution of the 2d simulation . figure [ cc_rhoplot ] depicts the density vs. radius for 1d ( lines ) and 2d ( crosses ) at times 0 , 70 , 110 , 130 , 140 , and 150 ms after the start of the calculation . core bounce occurs at 148 ms . other than a @xmath110% difference in the shock radii at 150 ms , 1d and 2d calculations track one another quite well . furthermore , fig . [ cc_gaccplot ] shows an exceptional correspondence between the 1d and 2d gravitational accelerations . using this core - collapse test to best represent the conditions during astrophysical simulations , we describe some timing results of this problem . a standard measure is the average cpu time spent per cell per cycle . using one core of a dual - core amd opteron2.8 ghz processor for this test , the average time spent is @xmath626 cpu seconds / cycle / cell . 80% of which is spent in amg1r6 , the multigrid solver . for this problem , the iterative multigrid solver usually takes @xmath15 to @xmath110 cycles to achieve a fractional residual of @xmath1@xmath627 to @xmath1@xmath628 , where the fractional residual of the linear system @xmath629 is @xmath630 . we re - simulate the collapse of the s15 model , but with an angular velocity profile of the form @xmath631 , where @xmath632 km and @xmath633 radians s@xmath186 . the @xmath188 vs. @xmath21 plot is shown in fig . [ cc_angvelplot ] . core bounce occurs at 151 ms . first of all , total angular momentum is conserved to machine accuracy . since there are no analytic descriptions for the evolution of angular velocity in core collapse scenarios , we can not validate the numerical results via analytic theory . however , the central angular velocity , @xmath634 is proportional to @xmath635 , where @xmath439 is the central density . since the central density compresses from @xmath110@xmath636 g @xmath181 at @xmath637 ms to @xmath12.2 @xmath638 g @xmath181 at @xmath639 ms , @xmath634 should be @xmath11600 radians s@xmath186 at @xmath639 ms . this is consistent with results shown in fig . [ cc_angvelplot ] . furthermore , the angular velocity evolves smoothly with no evidence of axis effects . on the other hand , there is a slight , but noticeable , glitch at the location of the shock . in this paper , we have presented the algorithms employed in bethe - hydro , a new code for 1d and 2d astrophysical hydrodynamic simulations . the hydrodynamic core is an ale algorithm , and its most striking feature is the ability to use arbitrary , unstructured grids . with finite - differencing based upon the support - operator method @xcite of @xcite and @xcite , energy is conserved to roundoff error in the absence of rotation and gravity , and momentum is strictly conserved using cartesian coordinates . for all other circumstances , energy and momentum are conserved accurately , if not precisely . we use a subcell remapping scheme that conservatively remaps mass , momentum , energy , and number density . for 2d calculations using cylindrical coordinates , we include rotational terms in the lagrangian solver , and develop a remapping algorithm that conservatively remaps angular momentum while minimizing unwanted features in the angular velocity near the axis . to provide shock resolution and grid stability , we use the tensor artificial viscosity of @xcite , and to minimize hourglass instabilities , we have developed a subcell pressure method that is a close derivative of the scheme developed by @xcite , but avoids pathological problems when used in conjunction with the subcell remapping algorithm . finally , we have developed a gravity solver for arbitrary grids that uses a support - operator technique for elliptic equations @xcite and an iterative multigrid - preconditioned conjugate - gradient method @xcite to solve the system of linear equations . overall , bethe - hydro offers many unique and useful features for astrophysical simulations . for one , by using ale techniques , the structure of bethe - hydro is straightforward , enabling simple inclusion of a variety of additional physics packages . examples , which will be discussed in future papers , are nuclear networks and time - dependent radiation transport . in contrast with other techniques , such as higher - order godunov methods , no assumptions are made in ale techniques about characteristic waves nor the relationships among important thermodynamic variables . hence , one of its useful features is an ability to use a general eos . most important among bethe - hydro s strengths is the ability to solve self - gravitating hydrodynamic flows on arbitrary grids . this is achieved primarily because the foundation of the lagrangian hydrodynamics solver is an arbitrary , unstructured polygonal grid . furthermore , grids may be time - dependent since the hydrodynamic flow from one timestep is remapped to another arbitrary grid for subsequent evolution . consequently , simulations may be executed using a purely lagrangian , purely eulerian , or an arbitrarily defined time - dependent grid . with bethe - hydro , simulations have great flexibility , tailoring the grid to minimize numerical error and suiting the grid to the computational challenge . ironically , this flexibility leads to bethe - hydro s most prominent weakness , which is shared among all ale codes , the hourglass instability and grid buckling . we use subcell pressure and tensor artificial viscosity algorithms to mitigate these numerical artifacts , but the resolution is imperfect . in [ section : hourglass ] , we present a subcell pressure algorithm that is compatible with the subcell remapping algorithm , but the efficacy of hourglass elimination is slightly compromised . although the tensor artificial viscosity does well to mitigate grid buckling , it can be more resistive to the proper development of hydrodynamic instabilities compared to other artificial viscosity schemes used in ale ( milan kucharik , private communication ) . hence , we diminish the effects of the hourglass instability , but with some unwanted side effects . while mitigation in 2d is tractable , the instability in 3d has many more modes and is not as easily eliminated ( guglielmo scovazzi , private communication ) , making long 3d ale simulations a challenge . throughout this paper , we have not only demonstrated bethe - hydro s flexibility , but have shown that it produces accurate and 2@xmath0-order convergent solutions . with density distributions having analytic potentials , we have shown that the 2d gravity solver gives accurate spherically symmetric potentials when a non - spherical grid is used , it produces accurate non - spherical potentials , and solutions converge with 2@xmath0-order accuracy . further tests demonstrated accurate solutions for self - gravitating hydrostatic and dynamic problems . we have shown that our hourglass elimination algorithm minimizes the hourglass instability and does not present problems when used in conjunction with subcell remapping . in addition , we have quantified the accuracy of hydrodynamic simulations by simulating problems with analytic solutions . simulating piston - driven shocks using oblique meshes , we confirmed we can obtain accurate solutions in the context of arbitrary grids . verifying the code s ability to capture basic hydrodynamic instabilities , we simulate the rayleigh - taylor and kelvin - helmholtz instabilities . concluding the tests , we simulated a supernova core collapse , which demonstrates the ability to simulate complex astrophysical phenomena . simulating hydrodynamic flow is fundamental to understanding most astrophysical objects , and despite the long tradition of hydrodynamic simulations many puzzles remain . this is due primarily to the need to address time - dependent gravitational potentials , complicated equations of state ( eoss ) , flexible grids , multi - d shock structures , and chaotic and turbulent flows . therefore , with bethe - hydro , we introduce a uniquely flexible and functional tool for advancing the theory of complex astrophysical phenomena . we would like to thank mikhail shashkov , raphael loubre , milan kucharik , and burton wendroff for valuable conversations about ale techniques . discussions concerning the 2d gravity solver with ivan hubeny , jim morel , david moulton , and david keyes of tops were very fruitful . we acknowledge support for this work from the scientific discovery through advanced computing ( scidac ) program of the doe , under grant numbers de - fc02 - 01er41184 and de - fc02 - 06er41452 , and from the nsf under grant number ast-0504947 . thanks the joint institute for nuclear astrophysics ( jina ) for support under nsf grant phy0216783 . we thank jeff fookson and neal lauber of the steward computer support group for their invaluable help with the local beowulf cluster , grendel . in eulerian form , the equations for conservation of mass , momentum , and energy are @xmath640 @xmath641 and @xmath642 = - \rho \vec{\nabla } \phi \cdot \vec{v } \ , .\ ] ] in this appendix , we give the exact analytic volumes and weighted - volume integrals in discrete form . since we are dealing with 2d simulations all integrals are 2d integrals , and can be further reduced using green s formula to 1d boundary integrals . for example , the volume of zone @xmath24 in cartesian coordinates is @xmath643 or alternatively , @xmath644 where the direction of the boundary integral is clockwise , @xmath207 indicates an edge of the cell , and subscripts 1 and 2 represent the endpoints of edge @xmath207 . in cylindrical coordinates , the volume integral is @xmath645 throughout bethe - hydro , integrals of linear functions produce volume integrals weighted by @xmath19 or @xmath20 . the discrete form of these integrals are @xmath646 and @xmath647 using cylindrical coordinates these are @xmath648 and @xmath649 ( z_2 - z_1 ) \ , . \end{array}\ ] ] , o. , moore , b. , stadel , j. , potter , d. , miniati , f. , read , j. , mayer , l. , gawryszczak , a. , kravtsov , a. , nordlund , . , pearce , f. , quilis , v. , rudd , d. , springel , v. , stone , j. , tasker , e. , teyssier , r. , wadsley , j. , & walder , r. 2007 , , 380 , 963 , g. , dearborn , d. s. p. , dossa , d. d. , eggleton , p. p. , taylor , a. , castor , j. i. , murray , s. , cook , k. h. , eltgroth , p. g. , cavallo , r. m. , turcotte , s. , keller , s. c. , & pudliner , b. s. 2003 , in astronomical society of the pacific conference series , vol . 293 , 3d stellar evolution , ed . s. turcotte , s. c. keller , & r. m. cavallo , 158381 lll 0 & @xmath360 & @xmath362 + 20 & @xmath669 & @xmath670 + 40 & @xmath671 & @xmath672 + 60 & @xmath673 & @xmath674 + 80 & @xmath675 & @xmath676 + 100 & @xmath677 & @xmath678 + 120 & @xmath679 & @xmath680 + 130 & @xmath681 & @xmath363 + Abstract:
[ "in this paper , we describe a new hydrodynamics code for 1d and 2d astrophysical simulations , bethe - hydro , that uses time - dependent , arbitrary , unstructured grids . the core of the hydrodynamics algorithm is an arbitrary lagrangian - eulerian ( ale ) approach , in which the gradient and divergence operators are made compatible using the support - operator method . we present 1d and 2d gravity solvers that are finite differenced using the support - operator technique , and the resulting system of linear equations are solved using the tridiagonal method for 1d simulations and an iterative multigrid - preconditioned conjugate - gradient method for 2d simulations . rotational terms are included for 2d calculations using cylindrical coordinates . we document an incompatibility between a subcell pressure algorithm to suppress hourglass motions and the subcell remapping algorithm and present a modified subcell pressure scheme that avoids this problem . strengths of this code include a straightforward structure , enabling simple inclusion of additional physics packages , the ability to use a general equation of state , and most importantly , the ability to solve self - gravitating hydrodynamic flows on time - dependent , arbitrary grids . in what follows , we describe in detail the numerical techniques employed and , with a large suite of tests , demonstrate that bethe - hydro finds accurate solutions with 2@xmath0-order convergence ." ]
22,915
22,915
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: in this paper we introduce a general lagrangian framework to study the dissipative properties of two component systems composed of a high - loss and lossless components which can have gyroscopic properties . this framework covers any linear lagrangian system provided it has a finite number of degrees of freedom , a nonnegative hamiltonian , and losses accounted by the rayleigh dissipative function , ( * ? ? ? 10.11 , 10.12 ) , ( * ? ? ? 8 , 9 , 46 ) . such physical systems include , in particular , many different types of damped mechanical systems or electric networks . [ [ motivation . ] ] motivation . + + + + + + + + + + + we are looking to design and study two - component composite dielectric media consisting of a high - loss and low - loss component in which the lossy component has a useful property ( or functionality ) such as magnetism . we want to understand what is the trade - off between the losses and useful properties inherited by the composite from its components . our motivation comes from a major problem in the design of such structures where a component which carries a useful property , e.g. , magnetism , has prohibitively strong losses in the frequency range of interest . often this precludes the use of such a lossy component with otherwise excellent physically desirable properties . then the question stands : is it possible to design a composite system having a useful property at a level comparable to that of its lossy component but with significantly reduced losses over a broad frequency range ? an important and guiding example of a two - component dielectric medium composed of a high - loss and lossless components was constructed in @xcite . the example was a simple layered structure which had magnetic properties comparable with a natural bulk material but with 100 times lesser losses in a wide frequency range . this example demonstrated that it is possible to design a composite material / system which can have a desired property comparable with a naturally occurring bulk substance but with significantly reduced losses . in order to understand the general mechanism for this phenomenon , the authors in @xcite considered a general dynamical system as the model for such a medium where the high - loss component of the medium was represented as a significant fraction of the entire system . we have found that for such a system the losses of the entire structure become small provided that the lossy component is sufficiently lossy . the general mechanism of this phenomenon , which we proved in @xcite , is the _ modal dichotomy _ when the entire set of modes of the system splits into two distinct classes , _ high - loss _ and _ low - loss modes _ , based on their dissipative properties . the higher loss modes for a wide range of frequencies contribute very little to losses and this is how the entire structure can be low loss , whereas the useful property is still present . in that work the way we accounted for the presence of a useful property was by simply demanding that the lossy component was a significant fraction of the entire composite structure without explicitly correlating the useful property and the losses . in this paper , we continue our studies on the modal dichotomy and overdamping , which began in @xcite , but now we focus are attention on gyroscopic - dissipative systems . although our results on modal dichotomy apply to the full generality of the dynamical systems considered here , our results on overdamping in this paper will be restricted to systems without gyroscopy . consideration of overdamping in systems with gyroscopy will be considered in a future work . [ [ overview - of - results . ] ] overview of results . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + now in order to account in a general form for the physical properties of the two - component composite system with a high - loss and lossless components we introduce a lagrangian framework with dissipation . this framework can be a basis for studying the interplay of physical properties of interest and dissipation . these general physical properties include in particular gyroscopy ( or gyrotropy ) , which is intimately related to magnetic properties , different symmetries and other phenomena such as overdamping that are not present in typical dynamical systems . in the lagrangian setting , the dissipation is taken into account by means of the rayleigh dissipation function ( * ? ? ? 10.11 , 10.12 ) , ( * ? ? * sec . 8 , 9 , 46 ) . in the case of two - component composite with lossy and lossless components , the rayleigh function is assumed to affect only a fraction @xmath0 of the total degrees of freedom of the system . in a rough sense , the loss fraction @xmath1 signifies the fraction of the degrees of freedom that are effected by losses . we now give a concise qualitative description of the main results of this paper which are discussed next and organized under the following three topics : overdamping and selective overdamping in section [ sodan ] ; virial theorem for dissipative systems and equipartition of energy in section [ svir ] ; standard spectral theory vs. krein theory in sections [ smodel ] and [ sspan ] . * overdamping and selective overdamping*. overdamping is a regime in dissipative lagrangian systems in which some of the systems eigenmodes are overdamped , i.e. , have exactly zero frequency or , in other words , are non - oscillatory when losses are sufficiently large . the phenomenon of overdamping has been studied thoroughly but only in the case when the entire system is overdamped @xcite , ( * ? ? ? 9 ) , @xcite meaning all its modes are non - oscillatory . the lagrangian framework and the methods we develop in this paper are applicable to the more general case allowing for only a fraction of the modes to be susceptible to overdamping , a phenomenon we call _ selective overdamping_. our analysis of overdamping and this selective overdamping phenomenon is carried out in section [ sodan ] . our main results are theorems [ tcovd ] , [ tpovd ] , [ cpodr ] , [ thmod ] , and [ tseod ] . our interest in selective overdamping is threefold . first , as we prove in this paper the selective overdamping of the system is a rather _ universal phenomenon _ that can occur for a two - component system when the losses of the lossy component are sufficiently large . moreover , we show that _ the large losses in the lossy component _ cause not only the modal dichotomy , but also _ results in overdamping of all of the high - loss modes while a positive fraction of the low - loss modes remain oscillatory_. second , since mode excitation is efficient only when its frequency matches the frequency of the excitation force , if these high - loss modes go into the overdamping regime having exactly zero frequency these modes can not be excited efficiently and therefore their associated losses are essentially eliminated . this explains the absorption suppression for systems composed of lossy and lossless components . third , as we will show , as the losses in the lossy component increase the overdamped high - loss modes are more suppressed while all the low - loss oscillatory modes are more enhanced with increasingly high quality factor . _ this provides a mechanism for selective enhancement of these high quality factor , low - loss oscillatory modes and selective suppression of the high - loss non - oscillatory modes_. in fact , we show that _ the fraction of all overdamped modes is exactly the loss fraction _ @xmath1 _ _ which satisfies _ _ @xmath0 , and half of these overdamped modes are the high - loss modes . thus it is _ exactly the positive fraction _ @xmath2 _ _ of modes which are low - loss oscillatory modes__. in addition , _ these latter modes have extremely high quality factor which increases as the losses in the lossy component increase_. an example of this behavior using the electric circuit in section [ scircuits ] was shown numerically in @xcite . * virial theorem for dissipative systems and equipartition of energy*. recall that the virial theorem from classical mechanics ( * ? ? ? * ; 3.4 ) ( which we review in appendix [ apdxvirthm ] ) is about the oscillatory transfer of energy from one form to another and its equipartition . for conservative linear systems whose lagrangian is the difference between the kinetic and potential energy , e.g. , a spring - mass system or a parallel lc circuit , the virial theorem says that for any time - periodic state of the system , the time - averaged kinetic energy equals the time - averaged potential energy . this result is known as the equipartition of energy because of the fact that the total energy of the system , i.e. , the hamiltonian , is equal to the sum of the kinetic and potential energy . it is this result that we generalize in this paper for dissipative lagrangian systems and their damped oscillatory modes . in particular , we show that _ for any damped oscillatory mode of the system the kinetic energy equals the potential energy _ and so _ there is an equipartition of the system energy for these damped oscillatory modes into kinetic and potential energy_. our precise statements of these results can be found in section [ svir ] in theorem [ tvir ] and corollary [ tvir_eqp ] . we have also found that the transition to overdamping is characterized by a breakdown of the virial theorem . more specifically , as the losses of the lossy component increase some of the modes become overdamped with complete ceasing of any oscillations and with breaking of the equality between kinetic and potential energy . such a _ breaking of the equipartition of the energy can viewed as a dynamical characterization of the overdamped modes ! _ so we now have two different characterizations of overdamping : spectral and dynamical . the effectiveness of this dynamical characterization is demonstrated in our study of the selective overdamping phenomenon and in proving that a positive fraction of modes always remain oscillatory no matter how large the losses become in the lossy component of the composite system . * standard spectral theory vs. krein spectral theory*. the study of the eigenmodes of a lagrangian system often relies on the fact the system evolution can be transformed into the hamiltonian form as the first - order linear differential equations . however , it is not emphasized enough that the hamiltonian setting does not lead directly to the standard spectral theory of self - adjoint or dissipative operators but that only it might be reduced to one in some important and well known cases by a proper transformation as , for instance , in the case of a simple oscillator . the general spectral theory of hamiltonian systems is known as the _ krein spectral theory _ @xcite , @xcite , @xcite . this theory is far more complex than the standard spectral theory and it is much harder to apply . we have found , as discussed in section [ smodel ] , a general transformation that reduces the evolution equation to the standard spectral theory under the condition of positivity of the hamiltonian . the standard spectral theory is complete , well understood , and allows for an elaborate and effective perturbation theory . we used that all in our analysis of the modal dichotomy and symmetries of the spectrum in section [ sspan ] as well as the selective overdamping phenomenon in section [ sodan ] . our main results on spectral symmetries are proposition [ pssym ] and corollary [ cssym ] . our principal results on the modal dichotomy can be found in theorems [ tmdic ] , [ cpodr ] and corollaries [ cpfsp ] , [ cmdic ] . in fact , it is important to point out that the key result of this paper that leads to the modal dichotomy which is essential in the analysis of overdamping is proposition [ pevbd ] which relates to certain eigenvalue bounds . moreover , these bounds and the dichotomy come from some general results that we derive in appendix [ apxebd ] on the perturbation theory for matrices with a large imaginary part . [ [ organization - of - the - paper . ] ] organization of the paper . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + the rest of the paper is organized as follows . section [ smodel ] sets up and discusses the lagrangian framework approach and model used in this paper to study the dissipative properties of two - component composite systems with a high - loss and a lossless component . in section [ scircuits ] we apply the developed approach to an electric circuit showing all key features of the method . sections [ svir][sodan ] are devoted to a precise formulation of all significant results in the form of theorems , propositions , and so on ( with section [ sproofs ] providing the proofs of these results ) . more specifically , section [ svir ] discusses our extension of the virial theorem and equipartition of energy from classical mechanics for conservative lagrangian systems to dissipative systems . section [ sspan ] is on the spectral analysis of the system eigenmodes including spectral symmetries , modal dichotomy , and perturbation theory in the high - loss regime . section [ sodan ] contains our analysis of the overdamping phenomena including selective overdamping . appendices [ apxsc ] and [ apxebd ] contain results we need that we believe will be of use more generally in studying dissipative dynamical systems , but especially for composite systems with high - loss and lossless components . in particular , appendix [ apxebd ] is on the perturbation theory for matrices with a large imaginary part . finally , appendices [ apenerg ] and [ apdxvirthm ] review the virial theorem from classical mechanics from the energetic point of view . the lagrangian and hamiltonian frameworks have numerous well known advantages in describing the evolution of physical systems . these advantages include , in particular , the universality of the mathematical structure , the flexibility in the choice of variables and the incorporation of the symmetries with the corresponding conservations laws . consequently , it seems quite natural and attractive to integrate dissipation into the lagrangian and hamiltonian frameworks . we are particular interested in integrating dissipation into systems with gyroscopic features such as dielectric media with magnetic components and electrical networks . we start with setting up the lagrangian and hamiltonian structures similarly to those in @xcite and @xcite . in particular , we use matrices to efficiently handle possibly large number of degrees of freedom . since we are interested in systems evolving linearly the lagrangian @xmath3 is assumed to be a quadratic function ( bilinear form ) of the coordinates @xmath4 _ { r=1}^{n}$ ] ( column vector ) and their time derivatives @xmath5 , that is @xmath6{l}\dot{q}\\ q \end{array } \right ] ^{\mathrm{t}}m_{\mathrm{l}}\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{l}\dot{q}\\ q \end{array } \right ] , \qquad m_{\mathrm{l}}=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}\alpha & \theta\\ \theta^{\mathrm{t } } & -\eta \end{array } \right ] , \label{dlag1}\ ] ] where @xmath7 denotes the matrix transposition operation , and @xmath8 and @xmath9 are @xmath10-matrices with real - valued entries . in addition to that , we assume @xmath8 to be symmetric matrices which are positive definite and positive semidefinite , respectively , and we assume @xmath9 is skew - symmetric , that is @xmath11 notice that only the skew - symmetric part of @xmath9 in ( [ dlag1 ] ) matters for the system dynamics because of the form of the euler - lagrange equations ( [ dlag4 ] ) and so without loss of generality we can assume as we have that the matrix @xmath9 is skew - symmetric . in fact , the symmetric part of the matrix @xmath9 if any alters the lagrangian by a complete time derivative and consequently can be left out as we have done . the lagrangian ( [ dlag1 ] ) can be written in the energetic form@xmath12 where @xmath13 are interpreted as the kinetic and potential energy , respectively . by hamilton s principle the dynamics of the system are governed by the euler - lagrange equations @xmath14 which are the following second - order ordinary differential equation ( odes ) @xmath15 the above second - order odes can be turned in the first - order odes with help of the hamiltonian function defined by the lagrangian through the legendre transformation @xmath16 hence,@xmath17 and , consequently @xmath18 = \frac{1}{2}\dot{q}^{t}\alpha\dot{q}+\frac{1}{2}q^{t}\eta q. \label{dlag7}\ ] ] in particular , the hamiltonian is the sum of the kinetic and potential energy , that is@xmath19 we remind that the hamiltonian function @xmath20 is interpreted as the system energy which is a conserved quantity , that is@xmath21 the function @xmath20 defined by ( [ dlag7 ] ) is a quadratic form associated with a matrix @xmath22 through the relation @xmath23{l}p\\ q \end{array } \right ] ^{\mathrm{t}}m_{\mathrm{h}}\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{l}p\\ q \end{array } \right ] , \label{dlag8}\ ] ] where @xmath22 is the @xmath24 matrix having the block form @xmath25{ll}\alpha^{-1 } & -\alpha^{-1}\theta\\ -\theta^{\mathrm{t}}\alpha^{-1 } & \theta^{\mathrm{t}}\alpha^{-1}\theta+\eta \end{array } \right ] = \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}\mathbf{1 } & 0\\ -\theta^{\mathrm{t } } & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}\alpha^{-1 } & 0\\ 0 & \eta \end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}\mathbf{1 } & -\theta\\ 0 & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] , \label{dlag7a}\ ] ] where @xmath26 is the identity matrix . notice that the representations ( [ dlag8 ] ) , ( [ dlag7a ] ) combined with the inequalities ( [ dlag2 ] ) imply@xmath27 the hamiltonian evolution equations then take the form@xmath28{l}p\\ q \end{array } \right ] = jm_{\mathrm{h}}\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{l}p\\ q \end{array } \right ] , \quad j=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}0 & -\mathbf{1}\\ \mathbf{1 } & 0 \end{array } \right ] \text { , } \label{dlag9}\ ] ] observe that the symplectic matrix @xmath29 satisfies the following relations@xmath30 * the rayleigh dissipation function . * up to now we have dealt with a conservative system satisfying the energy conservation ( [ dlag7b ] ) . let us introduce now dissipative forces using rayleigh s method described in ( * ? ? ? 10.11 , 10.12 ) , ( * ? ? ? * sec . 8 , 9 , 46 ) . the _ rayleigh dissipation function _ @xmath31 is defined as a quadratic function of the generalized velocities , namely @xmath32 where the scalar @xmath33 is a dimensionless _ loss parameter _ which we introduce to scale the intensity of dissipation . in particular , @xmath34 is an @xmath10 symmetric matrix with real - valued entries and , most importantly , is positive semidefinite . the dissipation is then introduced through the following general euler - lagrange equations of motion with forces@xmath35 where @xmath36 are generalized dissipative forces and @xmath37 is an external force , yielding the following second - order odes @xmath38 now by a linear ( dissipative ) _ lagrangian system _ we mean a system whose state is described by a time - dependent @xmath39 taking values in the hilbert space @xmath40 with the standard inner product @xmath41 ( i.e. , @xmath42 , where @xmath43 denotes the conjugate transpose , i.e. , @xmath44 ) whose dynamics are governed by the odes ( [ radis2a ] ) . the energy balance equation for any such state , which follows from ( [ radis2a ] ) , is @xmath45 where @xmath46 as in ( [ dlag7c ] ) but now instead of ( [ dlag3_1 ] ) we have@xmath47 we continue to interpret @xmath48 , @xmath49 as the kinetic and potential energies , @xmath50 as the system energy , and @xmath51 as the dissipated power . the term @xmath52 is interpreted as the rate of work done by the force @xmath53 . the physical significance of the various energetic terms @xmath54 , where @xmath55 , is that for a complex - valued state @xmath56 with real - valued @xmath57 both @xmath58 and @xmath59 are also states representing physical solutions and @xmath60 . these latter two terms in the sum reduce to the previous definitions of the energetic term @xmath54 above in ( [ dlag3_1 ] ) , ( [ dlag7 ] ) , or ( [ radis1 ] ) for real - valued vector quantities . we now introduce an important quantity the _ loss fraction _ @xmath61 . it is defined as the ratio of the rank of the matrix @xmath34 to the total degrees of freedom @xmath62 of the system@xmath63 from our hypothesis @xmath64 it follows that @xmath65 . we consider the dissipative lagrangian system to be a model of a two - component composite with a lossy and a lossless component whenever the loss fraction condition @xmath66 is satisfied . we then associate the range of the operator @xmath34 , i.e. , @xmath67 , with the lossy component of the system and consider the lossy component to be highly lossy when @xmath68 , i.e. , the high - loss regime . our paper is focused on this case . * on the eigenmodes and the quality factor . * to study the dissipative properties of the dissipative lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) in the high - loss regime @xmath68 , one can consider the eigenmodes of the system and their quality factor in this regime . an eigenmode of this system ( [ radis2a ] ) is defined as a nonzero solutions of the odes ( [ radis2a ] ) with no forcing , i.e. , @xmath69 , having the form @xmath70 , where @xmath71 and @xmath72 are called its frequency and damping factor , respectively . since the system is dissipative , i.e. , dissipates energy as interpreted from the energy balance equation ( [ radis4 ] ) , the damping factor must satisfy @xmath73 which implies that @xmath74 . thus , an eigenmode is a state of the dissipative lagrangian system which is in damped harmonic motion and the motion is oscillatory provided @xmath75 . an important quantity which characterizes the quality of such a damped oscillation is the quality factor @xmath76 ( i.e. , @xmath77-factor ) of the eigenmode which is defined as the reciprocal of the relative rate of energy dissipation per temporal cycle , i.e. , @xmath78 it follows immediately from this definition and ( [ radis4_1 ] ) that @xmath76 depends only on the complex frequency @xmath79 of the eigenmode , in particular,@xmath80 with the convention @xmath81 if @xmath82 . now the matrix hamilton form of the euler - lagrange equation involving rayleigh dissipative forces and external force ( [ radis2 ] ) reads@xmath83{ll}\beta r & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array } \right ] \right ) m_{\mathrm{h}}u+\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{l}f\\ 0 \end{array } \right ] , \quad u=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{l}p\\ q \end{array } \right ] . \label{radis3}\ ] ] it is important to recognize that the evolution equation ( [ radis3 ] ) are not quite yet of the desired form which is the most suitable for the spectral analysis . advancing general ideas of the hamiltonian treatment of dissipative systems developed in @xcite we can factor the matrix @xmath22 as @xmath84 where the matrix @xmath85 is the block matrix@xmath86{ll}k_{\mathrm{p } } & 0\\ 0 & k_{\mathrm{q}}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}\mathbf{1 } & -\theta\\ 0 & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] = \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}k_{\mathrm{p } } & -k_{\mathrm{p}}\theta\\ 0 & k_{\mathrm{q}}\end{array } \right ] , \label{radis6}\\ k_{\mathrm{p}}=\sqrt{\alpha}^{-1},\text { } k_{\mathrm{q}}=\sqrt{\eta } \label{radis6a1}\ ] ] which manifestly takes into account the gyroscopic term @xmath9 . here @xmath87 and @xmath88 denote the unique positive semidefinite square roots of the matrices @xmath89 and @xmath90 , respectively . in particular , it follows from the properties ( [ dlag2 ] ) and the proof of ( * ? ? ? * , theorem vi.9 ) that @xmath91 , @xmath92 are @xmath10 matrices with real - valued entries with the properties @xmath93 the introduction of the matrix @xmath85 according to @xcite is intimately related to the introduction of force variables@xmath94 consequently , recasting the evolution equation ( [ radis3 ] ) in terms of the force variables @xmath95 yields the desired canonical form , namely @xmath96 and@xmath97{cc}\omega_{\mathrm{p } } & -\mathrm{i}\phi^{\mathrm{t}}\\ \mathrm{i}\phi & 0 \end{array } \right ] , \text { \ } b = k\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}r & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array } \right ] k^{\mathrm{t}}=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}\mathsf{\tilde{r } } & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array } \right ] , \text { \ } f=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{l}k_{\mathrm{p}}f\\ 0 \end{array } \right ] , \label{radis8a}\\ \omega_{\mathrm{p}}=-\mathrm{i}2k_{\mathrm{p}}\theta k_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{t}},\text { \ \ } \phi = k_{\mathrm{q}}k_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{t}},\text { \ \ } \mathsf{\tilde{r}}=k_{\mathrm{p}}rk_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{t}}. \label{radis8b}\ ] ] observe that the @xmath24 matrices @xmath98 , @xmath99 in block form are hermitian and positive semidefinite , respectively , that is @xmath100 moreover , the matrix @xmath99 does not have full rank and its rank is that of @xmath34 , i.e. @xmath101 the _ system operator _ @xmath102 has the following important properties @xmath103 where the latter property comes from the fact that @xmath104 and @xmath105 . also , recall that for any square matrix @xmath106 , one can write @xmath107 , where @xmath108 and @xmath109 denote the real and imaginary parts of the matrix @xmath106 , respectively . now by the _ canonical system _ we mean the system whose state is described by a time - dependent @xmath110 taking values in the hilbert space @xmath111 with the standard inner product @xmath112 whose dynamics are governed by the odes ( [ radis8 ] ) . these odes will be referred to as the _ canonical evolution equation_. in this paper we will focus on the case when there is no forcing , i.e. , @xmath113 ( or , equivalently , @xmath69 ) . in this case , the canonical system represents a dissipative dynamical system ( since @xmath114 ) with the evolution governed by the semigroup @xmath115 . as we shall see in this paper and as mentioned in the introduction , there are some serious advantages in studying this dissipative dynamical system , i.e. , the canonical system , over the lagrangian or hamiltonian systems . in a previous work @xcite of ours , we studied canonical systems whose states are solutions of a linear evolution equation in the canonical form ( [ radis8 ] ) with system operator @xmath102@xmath116 @xmath117 , @xmath118 having exactly the properties ( [ radis10 ] ) in which the matrix @xmath99 did not have full rank . in that paper , the canonical system was a simplified version of an abstract model of an oscillator damped retarded friction that modeled a two - component composite system with a lossy and lossless component . we showed that the state @xmath110 of such a system satisfied the energy balance equation@xmath119 = -w_{\mathrm{dis}}\left [ v(t)\right ] + w\left [ v\left ( t\right ) \right ] , \label{radis11}\ ] ] in which the system energy @xmath120 $ ] , dissipated power @xmath121 $ ] , and @xmath122 $ ] the rate of work done by the force @xmath123 were given by @xmath124 = \frac{1}{2}\left ( v\left ( t\right ) , v\left ( t\right ) \right ) , \text { } w_{\mathrm{dis}}\left [ v(t)\right ] = \beta\left ( v\left ( t\right ) , bv\left ( t\right ) \right ) , \text { } w\left [ v\left ( t\right ) \right ] = \operatorname{re}\left ( v\left ( t\right ) , f\left ( t\right ) \right ) . \label{radis11a}\ ] ] an important result of this paper which follows immediately from the block form ( [ radis8a ] ) , ( [ radis8b ] ) and the relation between the variables @xmath95 , @xmath125 , @xmath126 from ( [ radis7 ] ) , ( [ radis3 ] ) , ( [ dlag6 ] ) ] is that a state @xmath77 of the lagrangian system , whose dynamics are governed by second - order odes ( [ radis2a ] ) , and the corresponding state @xmath95 of the canonical system , whose dynamics are governed by the canonical evolution equation ( [ radis8 ] ) , the energetics are equivalent in the sense @xmath127 = \mathcal{t}\left ( \dot{q},q\right ) + \mathcal{v}\left ( \dot{q},q\right ) , \text { \ } w_{\mathrm{dis}}\left [ v\right ] = 2\mathcal{r}\left ( \dot{q}\right ) , \text { \ } w\left [ v\right ] = \operatorname{re}\left ( \dot{q},f\right ) \text { , } \label{radis11b}\ ] ] where , as you will recall from the energy balance equation ( [ radis4 ] ) , @xmath128 was the system energy for the lagrangian system . * on the eigenmodes and the quality factor . * we will be interested in the eigenmodes of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) and their quality factor . an eigenmode of the canonical system is defined as a nonzero solutions of the odes ( [ radis8 ] ) with no forcing , i.e. , @xmath113 , having the form @xmath129 . the quality factor @xmath130 $ ] of such an eigenmode is defined as in @xcite by @xmath131=2\pi\frac{\text{energy stored in system}}{\text{energy lost per cycle}}=\left\vert \operatorname{re}\zeta\right\vert \frac{u\left [ v\left ( t\right ) \right ] } { w_{\mathrm{dis}}\left [ v(t)\right ] } . \label{radis12}\ ] ] by the energy balance equation ( [ radis11 ] ) it follows that @xmath131=-\frac{1}{2}\frac{\left\vert \operatorname{re}\zeta\right\vert } { \operatorname{im}\zeta } , \label{radis12_1}\ ] ] with the convention @xmath130=+\infty$ ] if @xmath82 . now given an eigenmode @xmath132 of the lagrangian system [ radis2a ] ) , it follows that the corresponding state @xmath95 of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) , related by ( [ radis7 ] ) , is an eigenmode of the form @xmath133 ( excluding the case @xmath134 , which can only occur if @xmath135 ) . importantly , the energetic equivalence ( [ radis11b ] ) holds and their quality factors ( [ radis4_3 ] ) , ( [ radis12_1 ] ) are equal , i.e.,@xmath136 = q_{\zeta}\text{. } \label{radis13}\ ] ] a more detailed discussion on the eigenmodes of the two systems and the relationship between them can be found in section [ sspan ] . one of the important applications of our methods described above is electric circuits and networks involving resistors representing losses . a general study of electric networks with losses can be carried out with the help of the lagrangian approach , and that systematic study has already been carried out in this paper . for lagrangian treatment of electric networks and circuits we refer to ( * ? ? ? 9 ) , ( * ? ? ? 2.5 ) , @xcite . we illustrate the idea and give a flavor of the efficiency of our methods by considering below a rather simple example of an electric circuit as in fig . [ figc1 ] with the assumptions@xmath137 this example has the essential features of two component systems incorporating high - loss and lossless components . , @xmath138 , @xmath139 , two inductances @xmath140 , @xmath141 , a resistor @xmath142 , and two sources @xmath143 , @xmath144 . this electric circuit example fits within the framework of our model . indeed , since resistors represent losses , this two component system consists of a lossy component and a lossless component the right and left circuits , respectively.,width=459,height=251 ] * the lagrangian system . * to derive evolution equations for the electric circuit in fig . [ figc1 ] we use a general method for constructing lagrangians for circuits , ( * ? ? ? 9 ) , that yields@xmath145 where @xmath48 and @xmath49 are respectively the kinetic and the potential energies , @xmath146 is the lagrangian , and @xmath31 is the rayleigh dissipative function . notice that @xmath147 and @xmath148 are the currents . the general euler - lagrange equations of motion with forces are , ( * ? ? ? 8),@xmath149 where @xmath77 are the charges and @xmath53 the sources@xmath150{c}q_{1}\\ q_{2}\end{array } \right ] , \quad f=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{c}e_{1}\\ e_{2}\end{array } \right ] , \label{circ3}\ ] ] yielding from ( [ circ0])([circ3 ] ) the following second - order odes@xmath151 with the dimensionless loss parameter@xmath152 that scales the intensity of losses in the system , and@xmath153{cc}l_{1 } & 0\\ 0 & l_{2}\end{array } \right ] , \text { \ \ } r=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}0 & 0\\ 0 & \ell \end{array } \right ] , \text { \ \ } \eta=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}\frac{1}{c_{1}}+\frac{1}{c_{12 } } & -\frac{1}{c_{12}}\\ -\frac{1}{c_{12 } } & \frac{1}{c_{2}}+\frac{1}{c_{12}}\end{array } \right ] . \label{circ6}\ ] ] recall , the loss fraction @xmath1 defined in ( [ radis4a ] ) is the ratio of the rank of the matrix @xmath34 to the total degrees of freedom @xmath62 of the system which in this case is @xmath154 thus the lagrangian system ( [ circ4 ] ) has all the properties described in sections [ slagrangian ] , [ slagrmodeleigenmqfac ] and since the loss fraction condition ( [ radis4b ] ) , i.e. , @xmath0 , is satisfied then it is model of a two - component composite with a lossy and a lossless component . * the canonical system . * following the method in section [ scansys ] , we introduce the variables @xmath95 defined by ( [ dlag6 ] ) , ( [ radis3 ] ) , ( [ radis7 ] ) in terms of the matrix @xmath85 defined in ( [ radis6 ] ) , ( [ radis6a1 ] ) as@xmath155{ll}k_{\mathrm{p } } & 0\\ 0 & k_{\mathrm{q}}\end{array } \right ] , \text { \ \ } k_{\mathrm{p}}=\sqrt{\alpha}^{-1}=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}\frac{1}{\sqrt{l_{1 } } } & 0\\ 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{l_{2}}}\end{array } \right ] , \text { \ \ } k_{\mathrm{q}}=\sqrt{\eta}.\nonumber\end{gathered}\ ] ] as @xmath156 is a @xmath157 matrix in this case , then we can compute its square root explicitly using the formula@xmath158 where @xmath159 denotes the positive square root , which holds for any @xmath157 matrix @xmath160 with @xmath161 . consequently , in the lagrangian system ( [ circ4 ] ) in terms of the variable @xmath95 is the desired canonical evolution equation from ( [ radis8 ] ) , namely , @xmath162 and@xmath163{cc}0 & -\mathrm{i}\phi^{\mathrm{t}}\\ \mathrm{i}\phi & 0 \end{array } \right ] , \text { \ } b=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}\mathsf{\tilde{r } } & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array } \right ] , \text { \ } f=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{l}k_{\mathrm{p}}f\\ 0 \end{array } \right ] , \label{circ11}\\ \phi = k_{\mathrm{q}}k_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{t}},\text { \ \ } \mathsf{\tilde{r}}=k_{\mathrm{p}}rk_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{t}}=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}0 & 0\\ 0 & \frac{\ell}{l_{2}}\end{array } \right ] .\nonumber\end{gathered}\ ] ] in this section we will introduce a new virial theorem for dissipative lagrangian systems in terms of the eigenmodes of the system . this result generalizes the virial theorem from classical mechanics ( * ? ? ? * ; 3.4 ) , as discussed in appendix [ apdxvirthm ] , for conservative lagrangian systems for these types of modes . recall that the virial theorem is about the oscillatory transfer of energy from one form to another and its equipartition . we can now state precisely and prove our generalization of the virial theorem to dissipative ( @xmath118 ) lagrangian systems ( [ radis2a ] ) and the equipartition of energy for the oscillatory eigenmodes . in fact , the proof in section [ sproofs ] shows that our theorem is true for more general system of odes in the form ( [ radis2a ] ) since essentially all that really matters is that the energy balance equation ( [ radis4 ] ) holds for the eigenmodes . [ virial theorem][tvir]if @xmath70 is an eigenmode of the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) then the following identity holds if @xmath75 : @xmath164 where @xmath165 and @xmath166 are the kinetic and potential energy , respectively , defined in ( [ radis4_0 ] ) . on the other hand , if @xmath167 then the identity ( [ tvirs1 ] ) no longer holds and either @xmath135 or the identity @xmath168 must hold . [ energy equipartition][tvir_eqp]for systems with @xmath169 , if @xmath70 is an eigenmode of the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) with @xmath75 , then the following identity holds@xmath170 in other words , for the oscillatory eigenmodes there is an equipartition of the system energy , i.e. , @xmath128 , between their kinetic energy @xmath48 and their potential energy @xmath49 . in this section we study time - harmonic solutions to the euler - lagrange equation ( [ radis2a ] ) which constitutes a subject of the spectral theory . an important subject of this section is the study of the relations between standard spectral theory and the quadratic pencil formulation as it arises naturally as the time fourier transformation of the euler - lagrange evolution equation . as introduced in section [ slagrmodeleigenmqfac ] , the eigenmodes of the lagrangian system are nonzero solutions of the odes ( [ radis2a ] ) with @xmath69 having the form @xmath70 . for a fixed @xmath33 , these modes correspond to the solutions of the quadratic eigenvalue problem ( qep)@xmath171 for the quadratic matrix pencil in @xmath79@xmath172 the set of eigenvalues ( spectrum ) of the pencil @xmath173 is the set@xmath174 which are exactly those values @xmath79 for which a solution to the qep ( [ pfsp1 ] ) exists . the spectral theory of polynomial operator pencils @xcite can be applied to study the eigenmodes but it has its disadvantages such as being more complicated than standard spectral theory . thus an alternative approach to the spectral theory is desirable . often the alternative approach is to use the hamiltonian system and consider its eigenmodes , that is , the nonzero solutions of the hamiltonian equations ( [ radis3 ] ) with @xmath69 having the form @xmath175 . these modes correspond to the solutions of the eigenvalue problem@xmath176 for the matrix@xmath177{ll}\beta r & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array } \right ] \right ) m_{\mathrm{h}}. \label{pfsp5}\ ] ] an advantage to this approach is the simple correspondence via ( [ dlag6 ] ) , ( [ radis3 ] ) between the set of modes of the two systems , namely , the eigenmodes of the hamiltonian system are solutions of ( [ radis3 ] ) having the block form @xmath178{l}p\\ q \end{array } \right ] e^{-\mathrm{i}\zeta t}$ ] in which @xmath70 an eigenmode of the lagrangian system and @xmath179 . in particular , this means the matrix @xmath180 and the pencil @xmath181 have the same eigenvalues and hence the same spectrum , i.e.,@xmath182 a major disadvantage of this approach is that @xmath183 is a non - self - adjoint matrix such that the standard theory of self - adjoint or dissipative operators does not apply without further transformation of the system , even in the absence of losses , i.e. , @xmath184 . instead , in this case it is the krein spectral theory @xcite , @xcite , @xcite that is often used . but this theory is far more complex than the standard spectral theory and much harder to apply . our approach to these spectral problems which overcomes the disadvantages in the pencil or krein spectral theory is to use the canonical system and consider its eigenmodes , that is , the nonzero solutions of the canonical evolution equation ( [ radis8 ] ) with @xmath113 having the form @xmath185 . these modes correspond to the solutions of the eigenvalue problem@xmath186 for the system operator @xmath187 with hermitian matrices @xmath98 , @xmath99 with @xmath188 . the advantage of this approach is that the standard spectral theory can be used since @xmath189 is a dissipative operator and when losses are absent @xmath190 is self - adjoint . this is a serious advantage since the spectral theory is significantly simpler and allows the usage of the deep and effective results from perturbation theory such as those developed in @xcite to study the modes of such canonical evolution equations having the general form ( [ radis8 ] ) . this is the approach we take in this paper to study spectral symmetries and the dissipative properties of the eigenmodes of the lagrangian system such as the modal dichotomy and overdamping phenomenon . * correspondence between spectral problems . * we now conclude this section by summarizing the correspondence between the two main spectral problems of this paper , namely , between the standard eigenvalue problem ( [ pfsp7 ] ) and the quadratic eigenvalue problem ( [ pfsp1 ] ) . we do this in the next corollary which uses the following proposition that tells us the characteristic matrix of the system operator @xmath191 can be factored in terms of the quadratic matrix pencil @xmath192 . first we introduce some notation that will be useful . the hilbert space @xmath111 with standard inner product @xmath112 can be decomposed as @xmath193 into the orthogonal subspaces @xmath194 , @xmath195 with orthogonal matrix projections@xmath196{cc}\mathbf{1 } & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array } \right ] , \text { \ \ } p_{\mathrm{q}}=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}0 & 0\\ 0 & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] . \label{pfsp8a}\ ] ] in particular , the matrices @xmath98 , @xmath99 , and @xmath102 defined in ( [ radis8])([radis8b ] ) are block matrices already partitioned with respect to the decomposition @xmath197 and any vector @xmath198 can be represented uniquely in the block form@xmath199{c}\varphi\\ \psi \end{array } \right ] , \text { \ \ where } \varphi = p_{\mathrm{p}}w,\text { \ \ } \psi = p_{\mathrm{q}}w . \label{pfsp8b}\ ] ] then with respect to this decomposition we have the following results . [ ppfsp]if @xmath200 then @xmath201{cc}k_{\mathrm{p } } & \zeta^{-1}\mathrm{i}\phi^{\mathrm{t}}\\ 0 & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}\zeta^{-1}\mathbf{1 } & 0\\ 0 & \zeta\mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}c(\zeta,\beta ) & 0\\ 0 & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}k_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{t } } & 0\\ -\zeta^{-1}\mathrm{i}\phi & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] . \label{pfsp8}\ ] ] [ spectral equivalence][cpfsp]for any @xmath202 , @xmath203 in particular , the system operator @xmath102 and quadratic matrix pencil @xmath204 have the same spectrum , i.e. , @xmath205 moreover , if @xmath200 then the following statements are true : 1 . if @xmath206 and @xmath207 then @xmath199{c}-\mathrm{i}\zeta\sqrt{\alpha}q\\ \sqrt{\eta}q \end{array } \right ] , \text { \ \ where } c(\zeta,\beta)q=0,\text { \ \ } q\not = 0 . \label{cpfsp3}\ ] ] 2 . if @xmath208 and @xmath209 then @xmath210{c}-\mathrm{i}\zeta\sqrt{\alpha}q\\ \sqrt{\eta}q \end{array } \right ] \not = 0 . \label{cpfsp4}\ ] ] in section [ stvspen ] it was shown that the study of the eigenmodes of the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) reduces to the quadratic eigenvalue problem ( [ pfsp1 ] ) and this motivates a study of the spectrum @xmath211 of the quadratic matrix pencil @xmath204 in ( [ pfsp2 ] ) . corollary [ cpfsp ] makes it clear that we can instead study the eigenmodes of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) and , in particular , the system operator @xmath102 spectrum satisfies @xmath212 . the purpose of this section is to give a detailed analysis of the set @xmath213 . recall , the system operator @xmath214 , @xmath118 from ( [ radis8 ] ) with @xmath24 matrices @xmath98 , @xmath99 has the fundamental properties ( [ radis10a ] ) , ( [ radis10b])@xmath215 where @xmath216 . these properties are particularly important in describing the spectrum @xmath213 of the system operator @xmath102 . for instance , the next proposition on the spectrum for nondissipative ( @xmath184 ) lagrangian systems ( [ radis2a ] ) follows immediately from these properties which would otherwise not be exactly obvious for gyroscopic systems ( i.e. , @xmath217 ) . [ real eigenfrequencies]for nondissipative lagrangian systems ( [ radis2a ] ) , that is when @xmath218 , all the eigenfrequencies @xmath79 are real , and consequently any eigenmode evolution is of the form @xmath219 with @xmath82 . if @xmath184 ( i.e. , no dissipation ) then @xmath220 is a hermitian matrix thus , the spectrum @xmath221 is a subset of @xmath222 . hence , if @xmath70 is an eigenmode of the lagrangian systems ( [ radis2a ] ) with @xmath184 then by corollary [ cpfsp ] we have @xmath223 and so @xmath82 . this completes the proof . in the next few sections we will give a deeper analysis of the spectral properties of @xmath102 including spectral symmetries in section [ sspsy ] and the modal dichotomy in sections [ sevmd ] , [ smdhlr ] . in order to do so we must first introduce some notation . in the hilbert space @xmath111 , denote by @xmath224 , @xmath225 the nonzero eigenvalues of @xmath99 ( counting multiplicities ) with the smallest denoted by @xmath226 in particular , the spectrum of @xmath99 is @xmath227 where @xmath228 . denote the largest eigenvalue of @xmath98 by @xmath229 . it follows from the fact that @xmath98 is a hermitian matrix which is skew - symmetric that @xmath230 where @xmath231 denotes the operator norm on square matrices . the next proposition describes the spectral symmetries of the system operator @xmath232 which follow from the property @xmath233 . [ spectral symmetry][pssym]the following statements are true : 1 . the characteristic polynomial of @xmath102 satisfies @xmath234 for every @xmath202 . in particular , the spectrum @xmath235 of the system operator @xmath232 has the symmetry@xmath236 2 . if @xmath237 is an eigenvector of the system operator @xmath232 with corresponding eigenvalue @xmath79 then @xmath238 is an eigenvector of @xmath232 with corresponding eigenvalue @xmath239 . 3 . if @xmath184 ( i.e. , no dissipation ) then @xmath240 @xmath241 for every @xmath202 . we will denote the discs centered at the eigenvalues of @xmath242 with radius @xmath229 by@xmath243 two subsets of the spectrum @xmath244 of the system operator @xmath245 @xmath117 which play a central role in our analysis are@xmath246 [ eigenvalue bounds][pevbd]the following statements are true : 1 . the eigenvalues of the system operator @xmath102 lie in the union of the closed discs whose centers are the eigenvalues of @xmath242 with radius @xmath229 , that is,@xmath247 2 . if @xmath207 and @xmath206 then@xmath248 3 . if @xmath79 is an eigenvalue of @xmath102 and @xmath249 then @xmath250 [ spectral clustering][cssym]the eigenvalues of the system operator @xmath187 , @xmath118 lie in the closed lower half of the complex plane , are symmetric with respect to the imaginary axis , and lie in the union of the closed discs whose centers are the eigenvalues of @xmath242 with radius @xmath229 . moreover , if @xmath184 ( i.e. , no dissipation ) then the eigenvalues of @xmath220 are real and symmetric with respect to the origin . [ modal dichotomy i][tmdic]if @xmath251 then @xmath252 furthermore , there exists unique invariant subspaces @xmath253 , @xmath254 of the system operator @xmath255 @xmath117 with the properties@xmath256 where @xmath111 . moreover , the dimensions of these subspaces satisfy@xmath257 [ high - loss susceptible subspace][dmdic]for the system operator @xmath258 @xmath117 with @xmath259 we will call its @xmath260-dimensional invariant subspace @xmath254 the high - loss susceptible subspace . we will call its @xmath261-dimensional invariant subspace @xmath262 the low - loss susceptible subspace . our reasoning for the definitions of these subspaces is clarified with the following corollary . [ high - loss subspace : dissipative properties][cmdic]if @xmath263 then@xmath264 furthermore , the quality factor ( [ radis12_1 ] ) of any eigenmode of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) in the high - loss susceptible subspace @xmath254 satisfies @xmath265\leq\frac{1}{2}\frac{\omega_{\text{max}}}{\beta b_{\text{min}}-\omega_{\text{max}}}<\frac{1}{2}. \label{cmdic2}\ ] ] in particular , as the losses go to @xmath266 the damping factor and quality factor of any such eigenmode goes to @xmath267 and @xmath268 , respectively , that is,@xmath269=0 . \label{cmdic3}\ ] ] we conclude this section with the following remarks . the spectrum of @xmath270 restricted to the low - loss susceptible subspace @xmath262 , that is , the set @xmath271 in ( [ cmdic1 ] ) , is close to the real axis and actually coalesces to a finite set of real numbers as losses @xmath272 . this statement is made precise in the following section with theorem [ cpodr ] and the asymptotic expansions in ( [ pod14 ] ) . on the other hand , results on quality factor for the eigenmodes in @xmath273 is far more subtle than the results in corollary [ cmdic ] for the eigenmodes in the high - loss susceptible subspace @xmath254 . for gyroscopic - dissipative systems considered in this paper , corollary [ cmdic ] above and proposition [ pqaollm ] below give a partial description of the nature of the quality factor for large losses , i.e. , @xmath68 , in the lossy component of the composite system . when gyroscopy is absent , i.e. , @xmath169 , then a more complete analysis for quality factor can be carried out , which we have done in section [ sodan ] of this paper in connection to our studies on the overdamping phenomenon . consideration of quality factor and overdamping in dissipative systems with gyroscopy , however , requires a more subtle and detailed analysis that will be considered in a future work . we are interested in describing the spectrum @xmath274 of the system operator @xmath275 , @xmath118 in the high - loss regime , i.e. , @xmath68 . we do this in this section by giving an asymptotic characterization , as @xmath272 , of the modal dichotomy as described in theorem [ tmdic ] and corollary [ cmdic ] . in order to do so we need to give a spectral perturbation analysis of the matrix @xmath270 as @xmath272 . fortunately , this analysis has already been carried out in @xcite . we now introduce the necessary notion and describe the results . the hilbert space @xmath111 with standard inner product @xmath112 is decomposed into the direct sum of orthogonal invariant subspaces of the operator @xmath99 , namely @xmath276 where @xmath277 ( the range of @xmath99 ) is the loss subspace of dimension @xmath278 with orthogonal projection @xmath279 and its orthogonal complement , @xmath280 ( the nullspace of @xmath99 ) , is the no - loss subspace of dimension @xmath281 with orthogonal projection @xmath282 . the operators @xmath98 and @xmath99 with respect to the direct sum ( [ pod5 ] ) are the @xmath157 block operator matrices@xmath283{cc}\omega_{2 } & \theta\\ \theta^{\ast } & \omega_{1}\end{array } \right ] , \quad b=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}b_{2 } & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array } \right ] , \label{pod7}\ ] ] where @xmath284 and @xmath285 are restrictions of the operators @xmath98 and @xmath99 respectively to loss subspace @xmath286 whereas @xmath287 is the restriction of @xmath98 to complementary subspace @xmath288 . also , @xmath289 is the operator @xmath290 whose adjoint is given by @xmath291 . the perturbation analysis in the high - loss regime @xmath68 for the system operator @xmath292 described in ( * ? * a , theorem 5 & proposition 11 ) introduces an orthonormal basis @xmath293 diagonalizing the self - adjoint operators @xmath294 and @xmath295 from ( [ pod7 ] ) with@xmath296 where@xmath297 then for @xmath68 the system operator @xmath298 is diagonalizable with basis of eigenvectors @xmath299 satisfying@xmath300 which split into two distinct classes @xmath301 with the following properties . * the high - loss class : * the eigenvalues have poles at @xmath302 whereas their eigenvectors are analytic at @xmath302 , having the asymptotic expansions@xmath303 the vectors @xmath304 , @xmath305 form an orthonormal basis of the loss subspace @xmath286 and@xmath306 in particular , @xmath224 , @xmath225 are all the nonzero eigenvalues of @xmath99 ( counting multiplicities ) . * the low - loss class : * the eigenvalues and eigenvectors are analytic at @xmath302 , having the asymptotic expansions@xmath307 the vectors @xmath304 , @xmath308 form an orthonormal basis of the no - loss subspace @xmath309 and@xmath310 by ( * ? ? ? * a , proposition 7 ) we know that the asymptotic formulas for the real and imaginary parts of the complex eigenvalues @xmath311 as @xmath272 are given by @xmath312 observe that the expansions ( [ pod16 ] ) imply @xmath313 justifying the names high - loss and low - loss . the following theorem is the goal of this section . it characterizes the spectrum @xmath244 of the system operator @xmath187 and the modal dichotomy from theorem [ tmdic ] and corollary [ cmdic ] in the high - loss regime @xmath68 in terms of the high - loss and low - loss eigenvectors . [ modal dichotomy ii][cpodr]for @xmath33 sufficiently large , the modal dichotomy occurs as in theorem [ tmdic ] and corollary [ cmdic ] with the following equalities holding : @xmath314 and@xmath315 in particular , @xmath254 and @xmath253 , the high - loss and low - loss susceptible subspaces of @xmath270 , respectively , have as a basis the high - loss eigenvectors @xmath316 and the low - loss eigenvectors @xmath317 , respectively . in the next section we will study overdamping phenomena for lagrangian systems ( [ radis2a ] ) . an important role in our analysis will be played by the eigenmodes @xmath318 , @xmath319 of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) which by the modal dichotomy split into the two distinct classes based on their dissipative properties:@xmath320 it should be emphasized here that the classification of these modes into high - loss and low - loss is based solely on the behavior of their damping factor in ( [ pod17 ] ) as losses become large , i.e. , as @xmath272 , and not necessarily on their quality factor which we will discuss at the end of this section . moreover , the damping factor is related to energy loss by the energy balance equation ( [ radis11 ] ) , ( [ radis11a ] ) satisfied by these modes which implies the dissipated power is@xmath321 & = -2\operatorname{im}\zeta_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) u[v_{j}\left ( t,\beta\right ) ] , \text { \ \ } 1\leq j\leq2n,\label{pod20a}\\ u[v_{j}\left ( t,\beta\right ) ] & = \frac{1}{2}\left ( w_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) , w_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \right ) e^{2\operatorname{im}\zeta_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) t}\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath322 $ ] defined in ( [ radis11a ] ) was interpreted as the system energy . in particular , by ( [ pod17 ] ) , ( [ pod20a ] ) , and the fact @xmath323 it follows that their system energy for any _ fixed _ satisfies@xmath325=0,\text { \ \ } 1\leq j\leq n_{r};\label{pod20b}\\ \text{low - loss } & \text { : \ \ } \lim_{\beta\rightarrow\infty}u[v_{j}\left ( t,\beta\right ) ] = \frac{1}{2},\text { \ \ } n_{r}+1\leq j\leq2n.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] this combined with ( [ pod17 ] ) , ( [ pod20a ] ) is the justification for the names high - loss and low - loss modes . * asymptotic formulas for the quality factor . * the perturbation analysis in the high - loss regime @xmath68 for the quality factor @xmath326 $ ] , @xmath319 of the eigenmodes from ( [ pod20 ] ) as given by ( [ radis12 ] ) , ( [ radis12_1 ] ) has already been carried out in ( * ? ? ? * a , prop . we will now describe the results . the quality factor @xmath327 $ ] , @xmath328 for each high - loss eigenmode has a series expansion containing only odd powers of @xmath329 implying for @xmath68 it is a nonnegative decreasing function in the loss parameter @xmath33 which has the asymptotic formula as @xmath272@xmath330 = \frac { 1}{2}\frac{\left\vert \rho_{j}\right\vert } { b_{j}}\beta^{-1}+o\left ( \beta^{-3}\right ) , \ \ 1\leq j\leq n_{r}. \label{pod21}\ ] ] it follows from this discussion that as @xmath272 @xmath330 \searrow0,\ \ 1\leq j\leq n_{r } \label{pod21_1}\ ] ] ( here we will use the notation @xmath331 @xmath268 or @xmath332 to denote that a function of @xmath33 is decreasing to @xmath268 or increasing to @xmath267 , respectively , as @xmath272 ) . the quality factor @xmath327 $ ] , @xmath308 for each low - loss eigenmode has two possibilities : ( i ) @xmath327 = + \infty$ ] for @xmath68 ; ( ii ) @xmath327 $ ] has a series expansion containing only odd powers of @xmath329 implying either @xmath326 \searrow0 $ ] or @xmath333 \nearrow+\infty$ ] as @xmath272 . finding necessary and sufficient conditions for when the cases occur is a subtle problem which is still open in general , but is solved completely in the next section on overdamping when @xmath169 under the nondegeneracy condition @xmath334 . we will now consider the cases @xmath335 [ cf . ( [ pod22 ] ) , ( [ pod22_1 ] ) ] or @xmath336 ( cf . prop . [ pqaollm ] ) . in the former case ( which is the typical case see ( * ? ? ? * a , remark 9 ) ) , we have as @xmath272 the asymptotic formula@xmath337 = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\left\vert \rho_{j}\right\vert } { d_{j}}\beta+o\left ( \beta ^{-1}\right ) , \ \ \text{if } d_{j}\not = 0 \label{pod22}\ ] ] and so it follows in this case that as @xmath272 @xmath337 \searrow0\text { , if } \rho_{j}=0\text { and } q\left [ w_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \right ] \nearrow+\infty,\text { if } \rho_{j}\not = 0\text{. } \label{pod22_1}\ ] ] * asymptotic oscillatory low - loss modes . * now the low - loss modes from ( [ pod20 ] ) with @xmath336 will play a key role in the study of the selective overdamping phenomenon in section [ spad ] . we call such modes the asymptotic oscillatory low - loss modes since if @xmath336 then the limiting function @xmath338 ( for fix @xmath339 ) is an oscillatory function in @xmath339 with period @xmath340 . thus as @xmath272 we denote this by @xmath341 from the quality factor discussion above for the low - loss modes the next proposition follows immediately , regardless of whether @xmath335 or not . [ q - factor : asymptotic oscillatory low - loss modes][pqaollm ] any low - loss eigenmodes from ( [ pod20 ] ) with @xmath336 has a quality factor @xmath327 $ ] with the property that either @xmath327 = + \infty$ ] for all @xmath68 or @xmath327 \nearrow+\infty$ ] as @xmath272 ( i.e. , is an unbounded increasing function of the loss parameter @xmath33 ) . the phenomenon of _ overdamping _ ( also called _ heavy damping _ ) is best known for a simple damped oscillator . namely , when the damping exceeds certain critical value all oscillations cease entirely , see , for instance , ( * ? ? 2 ) . in other words , if the damped oscillations are described by the exponential function @xmath342 with a complex constant @xmath79 then in the case of overdamping ( heavy damping ) @xmath343 . our interest to overdamping is motivated by the fact that if an eigenmode becomes overdamped it can not resonate at any finite frequency . consequently , the contribution of such a mode to losses at finite frequencies becomes minimal , and that provides a mechanism for the absorption suppression for systems composed of lossy and lossless components . the treatment of overdamping for systems with many degrees of freedom involves a number of subtleties particularly in our case when the both lossy and lossless degrees of freedom are present , i.e. , when the loss fraction condition ( [ radis4b ] ) is satisfied . we will show that any lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) with @xmath169 can be overdamped with selective overdamping occurring whenever @xmath34 does not have full rank , i.e. , @xmath344 , which corresponds to a model of a two - component composite with a high - loss and a low - loss component . let us be clear that we study overdamping in this paper only for the case @xmath169 as the case @xmath217 will differ significantly in the analysis and it is not expected that there exists such a critical value for damping when all oscillations cease entirely for any damped oscillation . a study of a proper generalization of overdamping in the case @xmath217 will be carried out in a future publication . we make here statements and provide arguments for overdamping for lagrangian systems . we will study the phenomenon known as overdamping in this section under the following condition : [ no gyrotropy][cndod]for our study of overdamping we assume henceforth that@xmath345 the following proposition is a key result that will be referenced often in our study of overdamping . it describes the spectrum of the @xmath24 matrices @xmath99 , @xmath98 in terms of the spectrum of the @xmath10 matrices @xmath346 , @xmath347 . [ spectra relations][pspre]for the @xmath24 matrices @xmath99 , @xmath98 and the @xmath348 matrices @xmath89 , @xmath90 , @xmath34 we have @xmath349 ( @xmath350 ) and @xmath351 for every @xmath202 . in particular , if @xmath352 and @xmath229 denote the smallest nonzero eigenvalue and the largest eigenvalue of @xmath99 and @xmath98 , respectively , and @xmath353 denotes the smallest positive eigenvalue of @xmath98 then @xmath354 and@xmath355 to study whether overdamping is possible we need to determine conditions under which@xmath356 has a solution for the system operator @xmath357 . but we know from corollary [ cpfsp ] that @xmath358 if and only if @xmath359 hence the solutions to ( [ lod1 ] ) are the solution of@xmath360 thus to study overdamping it suffices to study conditions under which the quadratic eigenvalue problem@xmath361 has a solution . to be explicit we have@xmath362 as it turns out the key to studying overdamping will be to study zero sets of the family of quadratic forms@xmath363 on certain subspaces of the hilbert space @xmath194 . in particular , we find that@xmath364 ^{2}-\frac{\left ( q,\eta q\right ) } { \left ( q,\alpha q\right ) } } .\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus we find that a necessary and sufficient condition for an eigenvalue @xmath79 of the system operator @xmath102 to satisfy @xmath343 is@xmath365 now there are some fundamental inequalities that play a key role in our overdamping analysis which are described in the following proposition . we will prove part of this proposition , the rest is proved in section [ sproofs ] , since the proof is enlightening showing how the energy conservation law ( [ radis4 ] ) and the virial theorem [ tvir ] can be used to derive these inequalities . [ fundamental inequalities][pfuineq]the following statements are true . 1 . for any @xmath366 with @xmath209,@xmath367 moreover , if @xmath368 exists then@xmath369 2 . if the matrix @xmath34 has full rank , i.e. , @xmath370 , then for any @xmath366 with @xmath209 , @xmath371 3 . for any @xmath372 @xmath373with @xmath75,@xmath374 4 . if @xmath375 [ or equivalently , @xmath376 then @xmath343 whenever any one of the following two inequalities is satisfied : ( i ) @xmath377 or ( ii ) @xmath368 exists and @xmath378 . 5 . if @xmath70 is an eigenmode of the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) then energy equipartition , i.e. , @xmath379 , can only hold if @xmath380 or , in the case @xmath368 exists , if @xmath381 . the first two statements are proved in section [ sproofs ] . the third statement will now be proved using the energy conservation law ( [ radis4 ] ) and the virial theorem [ tvir ] , or more specifically , corollary [ tvir_eqp ] on the equipartition of energy . @xmath373with @xmath382 . then @xmath70 is an eigenmode of the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) . it follows from ( [ radis4 ] ) and corollary [ tvir_eqp ] that for the system energy @xmath383 we have@xmath384 where @xmath385 and @xmath386 are the kinetic and potential energy , respectively , of this state @xmath77 and @xmath387 is the dissipated power . notice that for @xmath55 we have @xmath388 . it now follows from this and ( [ lod7_0c ] ) , ( [ lod7_0d ] ) that@xmath389 the proof of the third statement now follows from these two equalities and the inequality ( [ lod7_0 ] ) . the fourth statement follows immediately from the inequality ( [ lod7_0b ] ) and the inequality ( [ lod7_00 ] ) . the fifth statement follows from the fact that if @xmath390 then the equality ( [ lod7_0f ] ) holds , regardless of whether @xmath75 or not as long as @xmath200 , and so the result follows immediately from the inequalities ( [ lod7_0 ] ) and ( [ lod7_00 ] ) if @xmath200 . and since the existence of @xmath368 prohibits @xmath135 , the proof now follows . this completes the proof . from the inequalities ( [ lod7_0a ] ) , ( [ lod7_0b ] ) one can see clearly that if the matrix @xmath34 has full rank then all the eigenvalues of @xmath270 are purely imaginary once @xmath391 in other words , ( [ lod7_3 ] ) is a sufficient condition for all of the eigenmodes of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) [ or , equivalently , the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) ] to be overdamped , provided @xmath34 has full rank . but it is also clear that this argument must be refined if @xmath34 does not have full rank , i.e. , @xmath344 , since then @xmath392 and hence @xmath393 . the refinement we use is perturbation theory . in particular , we use our results in sections [ sspsy ] , [ smdhlr ] , [ svir ] on the modal dichotomy and the virial theorem to derive our main results on overdamping . our argument is essentially based on determining which of the eigenmodes can not maintain the energy equipartition in corollary [ tvir_eqp ] , i.e. , the equality between the kinetic and potential energy , when @xmath33 is sufficiently large by either using the inequalities in corollary [ cmdic ] or using the asymptotic expansions in section [ smdhlr ] for the eigenmodes in ( [ pod20 ] ) . this is where the fifth statement in proposition [ pfuineq ] is relevant . we derive the following results on overdamping using the inequalities in proposition [ pfuineq ] . [ complete overdamping][tcovd]if @xmath394 and @xmath395 has full rank , i.e. , @xmath370 , then all the eigenmodes of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) are overdamped , i.e. , for the system operator @xmath187 we have@xmath396 [ overdamped regime is optimal][eodop]the following example shows for the class of system operators @xmath397 under consideration in this paper , the regime @xmath251 is optimal for guaranteeing overdamping in the sense that we can always find an example of a system operator satisfying @xmath398 with @xmath33 as close to @xmath399 as we like such that the set @xmath400 is empty . in particular , it is proven using the following family of system operators@xmath163{cc}0 & -\mathrm{i}\\ \mathrm{i } & 0 \end{array } \right ] , \text { \ \ } b=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 \end{array } \right ] , \label{eodop1}\\ a\left ( \beta\right ) = \omega-\mathrm{i}\beta b,\text { \ \ } \beta \geq0,\nonumber\end{gathered}\ ] ] derived from the system with one degree of freedom having lagrangian and rayleigh dissipation function @xmath401{l}\dot{q}\\ q \end{array } \right ] ^{\mathrm{t}}m_{\mathrm{l}}\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{l}\dot{q}\\ q \end{array } \right ] , \quad m_{\mathrm{l}}=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{ll}1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 \end{array } \right ] , \label{eodop2}\\ r=\frac{1}{2}\left ( \dot{q},\beta r\dot{q}\right ) , \text { \ \ } r=1\text{,}\nonumber\end{gathered}\ ] ] which is just is the lagrangian for a one degree - of - freedom spring - mass - damper system with mass @xmath402 , spring constant @xmath402 , and viscous damping coefficient @xmath33 . then we have@xmath403 and therefore@xmath404 in this case , at the boundary of the overdamping regime , where @xmath405 , we have critical damping of the system . now we want to answer the question of which modes of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) are overdamped in the case when @xmath34 does not have full rank , i.e. , @xmath344 . the next theorem gives us a partial answer to the question . [ partial overdamping][tpovd]if @xmath251 and @xmath344 then the modal dichotomy occurs as in theorem [ tmdic ] and corollary [ cmdic ] . in addition , any eigenmode of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) in the invariant subspace @xmath406 ( the high - loss susceptible subspace ) is overdamped , i.e. , @xmath407 now we ask the important and natural question : can any of the modes of the system operator @xmath102 in the low - loss susceptible subspace @xmath273 be overdamped when @xmath34 from the rayleigh dissipative function @xmath31 in ( [ radis1 ] ) does not have full rank , i.e. , in the case when the lagrangian system is a model of a two - component composite with a lossy and a lossless component ? this question will be investigated in the next section . we are interested in solving the problem of describing all the modes of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) [ or , equivalently , the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) ] , with system operator @xmath245 @xmath117 , that are overdamped when losses are sufficiently large , i.e. , @xmath68 . in the previous section we solved the problem for lagrangian systems with complete rayleigh dissipative , i.e. , @xmath34 has full rank , for then theorem [ tcovd ] tells us that all the modes will become overdamped . on the other hand , for lagrangian systems with incomplete rayleigh dissipative , i.e. , @xmath34 does not have full rank , then theorem [ tpovd ] is a partial solution to the problem since it tells us that , due to sufficiently large losses , modal dichotomy occurs splitting the modes into the two @xmath102-invariant subspaces @xmath273 and @xmath406 ( the high - loss and low - loss susceptible subspaces , respectively ) with the modes belonging to @xmath254 overdamped . thus to solve the problem completely we need to describe which of the modes in the low - loss susceptible subspace @xmath253 can be overdamped when losses are sufficiently large . in this section we solve the problem asymptotically as losses become extremely large , i.e. , as @xmath272 , using the virial theorem [ tvir ] and , in particular , energy equipartition [ tvir_eqp ] for the eigenmodes and the perturbation theory developed in @xcite which we described in section [ smdhlr ] . our description of the selective overdamping phenomenon is based on the modal dichotomy in the high - loss regime @xmath68 as described in section [ smdhlr ] . in particular , we use theorem [ cpodr ] to characterize overdamping in terms of the high - loss and low - loss eigenmodes @xmath408 , @xmath319 of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) which split into the two distinct classes based on their dissipative properties ( [ pod20 ] ) . we say that such an eigenmode @xmath409 is _ overdamped _ for @xmath68 if @xmath410 for all @xmath33 sufficiently large . we say that such an eigenmode _ remains oscillatory _ for @xmath68 if @xmath411 for all @xmath33 sufficiently large . our first result tells us that all of the high - loss eigenmodes @xmath408 , @xmath305 from ( [ pod20 ] ) are overdamped regardless of whether @xmath34 has full rank or not . it is an immediate corollary of theorem [ tpovd ] and theorem [ cpodr ] . [ overdamped high - loss modes][thmod]all of the high - loss eigenmodes from ( [ pod20 ] ) are overdamped for @xmath68 . now we will discuss and give a solution to the problem of determining which of the low - loss eigenmodes @xmath412 , @xmath308 in ( [ pod20 ] ) will be overdamped . in order to do this we work under the following nondegeneracy condition : [ nondegeneracy][cndnd]for our study of the overdamping of the low - loss modes in this section , we assume henceforth that @xmath413 we have two main goals in this section . our first is to find necessary and sufficient conditions to have @xmath414 for @xmath68 . let @xmath415 be the number of low - loss eigenmodes that are overdamped for @xmath68 . our second goal is to calculate this number @xmath415 . we begin by recalling some of the important properties of the low - loss eigenpairs @xmath416 , @xmath417 , @xmath308 in ( [ pod11 ] ) for the system operator @xmath418 that we will need in this section . by ( [ pod14 ] ) and ( [ pod16 ] ) the limits@xmath419 exist and from ( [ pod8 ] ) , ( [ pod15 ] ) the limiting vectors @xmath420 are an orthonormal basis for @xmath421 which also diagonalize the self - adjoint operator @xmath294 from ( [ pod7 ] ) satisfying@xmath422 * overview of main results . * before we proceed , let us now summarize the results in this section . first , its obvious from this discussion that a necessary condition for the low - loss eigenmode @xmath409 to be overdamped for @xmath68 is @xmath423 ( even though it does so with a slow damping of order @xmath329 , as seen in ( [ llod1 ] ) and ( [ pod14 ] ) ) , but what is not obvious is that this is in fact a sufficient condition . although in the case @xmath368 exists ( i.e. , @xmath424 ) , it just follows from the fourth statement in proposition [ pfuineq ] since if @xmath423 then by ( [ llod1 ] ) we have @xmath425 which implies @xmath426 for @xmath427 and hence @xmath428 for @xmath68 . but this argument fails when @xmath429 . thus we must find an alternative method to show that @xmath423 is equivalent to @xmath410 for @xmath68 . the key idea that leads to an alternative method is to realize that by the virial theorem [ tvir ] and the fifth statement in proposition [ pfuineq ] , when @xmath368 exists the modes with @xmath423 are exactly the modes that break the energy equipartition . hence our general method is to show , even in the case @xmath424 , that for a low - loss modes with @xmath423 , there is a breakdown of the virial theorem [ tvir ] since as losses increase , i.e. , as @xmath272 , the equality between the kinetic and potential energy ( see corollary [ tvir_eqp ] ) of the corresponding eigenmode of the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) can no longer be maintained and must eventually break which forces the modes to be non - oscillatory for @xmath68 , i.e. , overdamped . this proves that @xmath423 is equivalent to @xmath428 for @xmath68 . thus it follows that the low - loss eigenmodes in ( [ pod20 ] ) of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) which are overdamped for @xmath68 , their limiting vectors ( satisfy @xmath430 @xmath431 for @xmath339 fixed ) form a orthonormal basis for @xmath431 . this implies of course that @xmath432 is the number of low - loss eigenmodes that are overdamped for @xmath68 . a major result of this section is that in fact @xmath433 , where @xmath434 . but @xmath435 is also the number of high - loss eigenpairs in ( [ pod11 ] ) . thus we conclude using these results and theorem [ thmod ] that the number of eigenmodes in ( [ pod20 ] ) which are overdamped in the high - loss regime @xmath68 is exactly @xmath436 with @xmath260 of these being low - loss eigenmodes and the rest being all the high - loss eigenmodes . moreover , in the case @xmath344 , the remaining @xmath437 modes are low - loss oscillatory modes with an extremely high quality factor that actually increases as the losses increase , i.e. , as @xmath272 . * main results . * we now give the statements of our main results . the proof of the first theorem we give in this section as it is enlightening . the proofs of the rest of the statements below are found in section [ sproofs ] . [ overdamped low - loss modes][tlmod]a necessary and sufficient condition for a low - loss eigenmode @xmath438 from ( [ pod20 ] ) to be overdamped for @xmath68 is @xmath423 ( or equivalently , @xmath439 ) . let @xmath440 be a low - loss eigenmode from ( [ pod20 ] ) . if it is overdamped for @xmath68 then @xmath410 for @xmath68 ( i.e. , for all @xmath33 sufficiently large ) and so by ( [ llod1 ] ) , ( [ llod2 ] ) we have @xmath423 and @xmath441 ( the nullspace of @xmath294 ) . lets now prove the converse . suppose @xmath423 . then we must show that @xmath428 for @xmath68 . suppose that this was not true . then since @xmath416 was analytic at @xmath302 we must have @xmath442 for @xmath68 . thus by corollary [ cpfsp ] there is a corresponding eigenmode @xmath443 of the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) such that with respect to the block representation ( [ pfsp8b ] ) the vector @xmath417 is @xmath444{c}-\mathrm{i}\zeta_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \sqrt{\alpha}q_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \\ \sqrt{\eta}q_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \end{array } \right ] . \label{llod3}\ ] ] in particular , @xmath445 and @xmath446 are related by ( [ radis7 ] ) , namely,@xmath447 by section [ seneq ] on the energetic equivalence between the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) and the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) it follows that@xmath448 = \mathcal{t}\left ( \dot{q},q\right ) + \mathcal{v}\left ( \dot{q},q\right ) . \label{llod5}\ ] ] the term on the left is the system energy of the eigenmode @xmath445 of the canonical system defined in ( [ radis11a ] ) whereas the sum on the right is the system energy of the eigenmode @xmath446 of the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) , i.e. , the sum of its kinetic and potential energy . as proved in section [ pspad ] , for any fixed time @xmath339 we have @xmath449 = \lim_{\beta\rightarrow\infty}\mathcal{v}\left ( \dot{q}_{j}\left ( t\,,\beta\right ) , q_{j}\left ( t\,,\beta\right ) \right ) , \label{llod6}\\ \lim_{\beta\rightarrow\infty}\mathcal{t}\left ( \dot{q}_{j}\left ( t\,,\beta\right ) , \dot{q}_{j}\left ( t\,,\beta\right ) \right ) = 0.\nonumber\end{gathered}\ ] ] this proves that @xmath450 and , consequently , by the energy equipartition ( see corollary [ tvir_eqp ] ) that@xmath451 this completes the proof . [ clmod]the collection of limiting values as @xmath272 ( with @xmath339 fixed ) of the low - loss eigenmodes in ( [ pod20 ] ) of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) which are overdamped for @xmath68 is @xmath452 @xmath453 and is an orthonormal basis for @xmath431 . [ plmod]let @xmath415 denote the number low - loss eigenmodes in ( [ pod20 ] ) of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) which are overdamped for @xmath68 . then @xmath454 where @xmath455 . [ number of overdamped modes][tnlm]the total number of eigenmodes of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) from ( [ pod20 ] ) which are overdamped for @xmath68 is @xmath436 , where @xmath455 . furthermore , @xmath260 of these are low - loss eigenmodes and the rest are all of the high - loss eigenmodes . moreover , if @xmath344 then the @xmath456 modes which are not overdamped as @xmath68 are low - loss eigenmodes which remain oscillatory for @xmath68 . [ selective overdamping][tseod]if @xmath344 then there is exactly @xmath456 low - loss eigenmodes of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) from ( [ pod20 ] ) which remain oscillatory for @xmath68 ( i.e. , @xmath411 for @xmath68 ) and their quality factors as given by ( [ radis12 ] ) , ( [ radis12_1 ] ) have the following property @xmath457 = + \infty\text { for } \beta\gg1\text { or } q\left [ w_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \right ] \nearrow+\infty\text { as } \beta\rightarrow\infty . \label{tseod1}\ ] ] this section contains the proofs of the results from sections [ svir ] , [ sspan ] and [ sodan ] . proofs are organized in the order in which statements appeared and grouped according to the sections and subsections in which they are located in the paper . all assumptions , notation , and conventions used here will adhere to that previously introduced in this paper . the proofs of statements in section [ svir ] are contained here . [ proof of theorem [ tvir]]for @xmath70 an eigenmode of the lagrangian system ( [ radis2a ] ) , we consider the virial@xmath458 in our proof we will use the real quantities @xmath459 and @xmath460 . if @xmath135 we are done . thus , suppose that @xmath200 . the virial ( [ vir1 ] ) satisfies@xmath461 taking the time - derivative of ( [ vir9 ] ) and using ( [ radis2a ] ) yields the identity@xmath462 where @xmath463 . the energy balance equation ( [ radis4 ] ) implies@xmath464 combining the identities ( [ vir10 ] ) and ( [ vir11 ] ) yields immediately the identity@xmath465 from ( [ vir12 ] ) and since @xmath466 we derive the identity@xmath467 if @xmath75 or @xmath468 if @xmath343 . suppose now that @xmath75 . then , by taking the imaginary and real parts of the identity ( [ vir14 ] ) , we find that@xmath469 the rest of the proof of theorem [ tvir ] now immediately follows from ( [ vir16 ] ) and ( [ radis4_0 ] ) . [ proof of corollary [ tvir_eqp]]corollary [ tvir_eqp ] follows immediately from the virial theorem [ tvir ] . the proofs of statements in section [ sspan ] are contained here . [ proof of proposition [ ppfsp]]the factorization ( [ pfsp8 ] ) follows from formula ( [ mab2 ] ) in appendix [ apxsc ] and ( [ radis6a1 ] ) , ( [ radis6b ] ) , ( [ radis8])([radis8b ] ) , ( [ pfsp2 ] ) since@xmath470{cc}\zeta\mathbf{1}-\omega_{\mathrm{p}}+\mathrm{i}\mathsf{\tilde{r } } & \mathrm{i}\phi^{\mathrm{t}}\\ -\mathrm{i}\phi & \zeta\mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \\ = \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}\mathbf{1 } & \zeta^{-1}\mathrm{i}\phi^{\mathrm{t}}\\ 0 & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}\zeta\mathbf{1}-\omega_{\mathrm{p}}+\mathrm{i}\mathsf{\tilde{r}}-\zeta ^{-1}\mathrm{i}\phi^{\mathrm{t}}\left ( -\mathrm{i}\phi\right ) & 0\\ 0 & \zeta\mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}\mathbf{1 } & 0\\ -\zeta^{-1}\mathrm{i}\phi & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \\ = \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}k_{\mathrm{p } } & \zeta^{-1}\mathrm{i}\phi^{\mathrm{t}}\\ 0 & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}\zeta^{-1}\mathbf{1 } & 0\\ 0 & \zeta\mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}c(\zeta,\beta ) & 0\\ 0 & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}k_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{t } } & 0\\ -\zeta^{-1}\mathrm{i}\phi & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] .\end{gathered}\ ] ] this completes the proof . [ proof of corollary [ cpfsp]]the proof of this corollary follows immediately from the factorization ( [ pfsp8 ] ) using the facts @xmath471 , @xmath472 and@xmath473{cc}k_{\mathrm{p}}^{\mathrm{t } } & 0\\ -\zeta^{-1}\mathrm{i}\phi & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] ^{-1}=\left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}\sqrt{\alpha } & 0\\ \zeta^{-1}\mathrm{i}\phi\sqrt{\alpha } & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] .\ ] ] [ proof of proposition [ pssym]]the proof of this proposition follows immediately from elementary properties of the determinant and using the fundamental property of the system operator @xmath275 in ( [ sasp1 ] ) , namely , @xmath474 which implies @xmath475 . [ proof of proposition [ pevbd]]the second statement follows immediately from ( [ sasp1 ] ) since if @xmath206 and @xmath207 then@xmath476 from this and using ( [ sasp1])([sasp3 ] ) , the first and third statements follow immediately from proposition [ apxpebd ] in appendix [ apxebd ] . this completes the proof . [ proof of corollary [ cssym]]the proof of this corollary follows immediately from propositions [ pssym ] and [ pevbd ] . [ proof of theorem [ tmdic]]suppose that @xmath251 . it follows from theorem [ apxtmd ] in appendix [ apxebd ] that the @xmath24 matrix @xmath102 satisfies the hypotheses of the theorem and together with ( [ sasp1 ] ) , ( [ ebmd1 ] ) implies @xmath477 and the sets @xmath478 , @xmath479 in ( [ mdss ] ) satisfy@xmath480 moreover , theorem [ apxtmd ] gives the existence of unique projection matrices @xmath481 , @xmath482 such that in the space @xmath111 the subspaces @xmath483 and @xmath484 have exactly the desired properties in theorem [ tmdic ] with their dimensions satisfying@xmath485 this completes the proof . [ proof of corollary [ cmdic]]first , if @xmath237 is an eigenvector of @xmath270 with corresponding eigenvalue @xmath79 then proposition [ pevbd ] and ( [ sasp3 ] ) imply@xmath486 assume now that @xmath251 . then by ( [ sasp1])([sasp3 ] ) , ( [ pcmdic1 ] ) , and theorem [ tmdic ] the proof of the first part of corollary [ cmdic ] follows immediately from corollary [ apxcmd ] in appendix [ apxebd ] . the rest of the proof now follows immediately from ( [ pcmdic1 ] ) , formula ( [ radis12_1 ] ) , and the first part of corollary [ cmdic ] . this completes the proof . [ proof of theorem [ cpodr]]consider the high - loss and low - loss eigenpairs @xmath416 , @xmath417 , @xmath487 for @xmath68 introduced in section [ smdhlr ] . the have the properties that @xmath488 are a basis of eigenvectors for the system operator @xmath102 satisfying @xmath489 the proof of theorem [ cpodr ] follows from these facts , theorem [ tmdic ] , and corollary [ cmdic ] . the proofs of statements in section [ sodan ] are contained here . recall , that we are assuming from now on that condition [ cndod ] is true i.e. , @xmath490 [ proof of proposition [ pspre]]using the block representation of the matrices @xmath98 , @xmath99 in ( [ radis8a ] ) and the result ( [ mab5 ] ) in appendix [ apxsc ] on the determinant of block matrices with commuting block entries we find that for any @xmath202 we have@xmath491{cc}\zeta\mathbf{1 } & \mathrm{i}\phi^{\mathrm{t}}\\ -\mathrm{i}\phi & \zeta\mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \right ) = \det\left ( \zeta^{2}\mathbf{1-}\phi^{\mathrm{t}}\phi\right ) = \det\left ( \zeta^{2}\mathbf{1}-\alpha^{-1}\eta\right ) , \\ \det\left ( \zeta\mathbf{1}-b\right ) & = \det\left ( \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}\zeta\mathbf{1-}\mathsf{\tilde{r } } & 0\\ 0 & \zeta\mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \right ) = \zeta^{n}\det\left ( \zeta\mathbf{1-}\mathsf{\tilde{r}}\right ) = \zeta^{n}\det\left ( \zeta\mathbf{1-}\alpha^{-1}r_{\mathrm{h}}\right ) , \end{aligned}\ ] ] since by ( [ radis6a1 ] ) , ( [ radis6b ] ) , ( [ radis8b ] ) we have @xmath492 and @xmath493 . the proof now follows from these facts . [ proof of proposition [ pfuineq]]the last three statements have already been proved . the first two statements are proved using proposition [ pspre ] and the following series of inequalities which just use elementary properties of the operator norm @xmath231 for hermitian matrices @xmath494 where @xmath495 or @xmath34 and the inequality ( [ lod7_1a ] ) requires the hypothesis that @xmath90 or @xmath34 , respectively , be invertible so that @xmath496 . the completes the proof . [ proof of theorem [ tcovd]]suppose @xmath394and @xmath497 , where @xmath216 . if @xmath79 was an eigenvalue of @xmath102 with @xmath75 then by proposition [ pfuineq ] we have @xmath498 a contradiction . therefore , all the eigenvalues of the system operator @xmath102 are real . this completes the proof . [ proof of theorem [ tpovd]]suppose @xmath394and @xmath499 . then by theorem [ tmdic ] and corollary [ cmdic ] , if @xmath500 then @xmath501 and so by proposition [ pfuineq ] we must have @xmath343 . therefore , all the eigenvalues of @xmath270 in @xmath502 are real . [ proof of theorem [ thmod]]if @xmath438 is a high - loss eigenmode from ( [ pod20 ] ) then by the modal dichotomy ( [ cpodr ] ) we must have latexmath:[$\zeta_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \in\sigma\left ( a\left ( \beta\right ) @xmath68 ( i.e. , for @xmath33 sufficiently large ) . by theorem [ tpovd ] it follows that @xmath428 for @xmath68 . therefore , @xmath409 is overdamped for @xmath68 . this completes the proof . we will now assume in the rest of the proofs that condition [ cndnd ] is true i.e. , @xmath504 . [ proof of theorem [ tlmod]]the proof of this theorem was started in section [ spad2 ] . it remains to show that ( [ llod6 ] ) holds . first , we have that @xmath505 with @xmath506 and @xmath507 by the properties of the low - loss eigenmodes in ( [ pod20 ] ) and since ( [ llod1 ] ) , ( [ llod2 ] ) is true for these modes together with the hypothesis @xmath423 . now we use the representation ( [ llod3 ] ) and ( [ plmodp6 ] ) for @xmath417 and @xmath431 , respectively , to imply that as @xmath272 @xmath444{c}-\mathrm{i}\zeta_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \sqrt{\alpha}q_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \\ \sqrt{\eta}q_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \end{array } \right ] \rightarrow\mathring{w}_{j}=\begin{bmatrix } 0\\ \mathring{\psi}\end{bmatrix } , \text { } -\mathrm{i}\zeta_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \sqrt{\alpha}q_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \rightarrow0,\text { } \sqrt{\eta}q_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \rightarrow\mathring{\psi } \label{tlmod1}\ ] ] for some @xmath508 . it follows from ( [ tlmod1 ] ) and the fact @xmath509 that for any fixed time @xmath339 we have as @xmath272@xmath510 & = \frac{1}{2}\left ( w_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) , w_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) \right ) e^{2\operatorname{im}\zeta_{j}\left ( \beta\right ) t}\rightarrow\frac{1}{2}\left ( \mathring{w}_{j},\mathring{w}_{j}\right ) = \frac{1}{2}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] this proves ( [ llod6 ] ) since by ( [ tlmod1 ] ) we have @xmath511 . this completes the proof . [ proof of corollary [ clmod]]this corollary follows immediately from theorem [ tlmod ] and the fact that the @xmath512 are an orthonormal basis for @xmath421 which diagonalize the self - adjoint operator @xmath294 such that ( [ llod2 ] ) is satisfied . [ proof of theorem [ tnlm]]this theorem follows immediately from theorems [ thmod ] and [ tlmod ] , corollary [ clmod ] , and proposition [ pqaollm ] ( which is proved below ) . [ proof of theorem [ tseod]]this theorem follows immediately from theorems [ tnlm ] , [ tlmod ] and proposition [ pqaollm ] . [ proof of proposition [ plmod]]let @xmath415 denote the number of low - loss eigenmodes of the canonical system ( [ radis8 ] ) in ( [ pod20 ] ) which are overdamped for @xmath68 . then by corollary [ clmod ] we know that@xmath513 we will now prove that @xmath514 where by ( [ radis10a ] ) , @xmath455 . we will use the elementary facts from linear algebra that since @xmath90 , @xmath515 are @xmath10 matrices which are positive semidefinite then @xmath516 another elementary fact from linear algebra which we need is that if @xmath517 and @xmath518 are subspaces in the same hilbert space then@xmath519 where @xmath520 . thus with @xmath521 , @xmath522 we have@xmath523 where the sum is direct by condition [ cndnd ] , i.e. , the hypothesis @xmath334 . in particular , this implies @xmath524 the proof of ( [ plmodp0 ] ) will be carried out in a series of steps which we outline now before we begin . first , we will prove that @xmath525{c}0\\ \psi \end{array } \right ] : \sqrt{\eta}\psi\in\operatorname{ran}\eta\cap\operatorname{ran}r\right\ } , \label{plmodp6}\ ] ] where the block form is with respect to the decomposition @xmath193 , @xmath111 , @xmath526 described in section [ stvspen ] , i.e. , the form ( [ pfsp8b ] ) . next , it follows immediately from ( [ plmodp1 ] ) that @xmath527 finally , we prove that @xmath528 the proof of ( [ plmodp0 ] ) follows immediately from ( [ plmodp6])([plmodp8 ] ) . we begin by computing the representation ( [ plmodp6 ] ) for @xmath431 . first , by its definition from ( [ pod7 ] ) , @xmath294 is the restriction of the operator @xmath98 to the no - loss subspace @xmath280 , that is,@xmath529 where @xmath282 is the orthogonal projection onto @xmath288 in the hilbert space @xmath111 with standard inner product @xmath112 . denote by @xmath530 the orthogonal projection onto @xmath531 in the hilbert space @xmath194 with the standard inner product . then it follows from the block representation of @xmath98 and @xmath99 in ( [ pod7 ] ) with respect to the decomposition @xmath193 that @xmath282 and @xmath532 with respect to this decomposition are the block operators @xmath533 from ( [ plmodp9 ] ) , ( [ plmodp10 ] ) it follows that@xmath525{c}\varphi\\ \psi \end{array } \right ] \in\operatorname{ker}\mathsf{\tilde{r}}\oplus h_{\mathrm{q}}:-\mathrm{i}p_{\mathsf{\tilde{r}}}^{\bot}\phi^{\mathrm{t}}\psi=0\text { and } \mathrm{i}\phi p_{\mathsf{\tilde{r}}}^{\bot}\varphi=0\right\ } .\ ] ] but if @xmath534 with @xmath535 then @xmath536 by definition of @xmath530 and hence @xmath537 and @xmath538 which implies @xmath539 and @xmath540 since by ( [ radis8b ] ) and ( [ radis6a1 ] ) we have @xmath541 , @xmath542 , @xmath543 , and @xmath544 . by the hypothesis of condition [ cndnd ] this implies that @xmath545 . also , since @xmath546 is a hermitian matrix it follows that @xmath547 is the orthogonal projection onto the @xmath548 so that @xmath549 is equivalent to @xmath550 and this is equivalent to @xmath551 @xmath67 by properties ( [ radis6b ] ) . but @xmath551 @xmath67 is equivalent to @xmath551 @xmath552 which by ( [ plmodp1 ] ) is equivalent to @xmath551 @xmath553 . this proves ( [ plmodp6 ] ) . finally , we will now prove ( [ plmodp8 ] ) . it follows from the fact that @xmath90 is a hermitian matrix and ( [ plmodp1 ] ) that the restriction of the operator@xmath88 to @xmath554 , i.e. , @xmath555 , is an invertible operator and that @xmath556 from this it follows that@xmath557 the proof of ( [ plmodp8 ] ) immediately follows from this fact and ( [ plmodp5 ] ) . this completes the proof of the theorem . let @xmath558{cc}p & q\\ r & s \end{array } \right ] \label{mab1}\ ] ] be a square matrix represented in block form where @xmath559 and @xmath560 are square matrices with the latter invertible , that is , @xmath561 . then the following _ aitken block - diagonalization formula _ holds @xcite , @xcite,@xmath558{cc}p & q\\ r & s \end{array } \right ] = \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}\mathbf{1 } & qs^{-1}\\ 0 & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}p - qs^{-1}r & 0\\ 0 & s \end{array } \right ] \left [ \begin{array } [ c]{cc}\mathbf{1 } & 0\\ s^{-1}r & \mathbf{1}\end{array } \right ] , \label{mab2}\ ] ] where the matrix@xmath562 is known as the _ schur complement _ of @xmath560 in @xmath106 . the aitken formula ( [ mab2 ] ) readily implies@xmath563 from this we can conclude that@xmath564 but the latter statement is true even if @xmath565 which is proved using a limiting argument . indeed , by substituting for @xmath560 in ( [ mab1 ] ) the small perturbation @xmath566 which is invertible for @xmath567 and commutes with any matrix that @xmath560 commutes with then statement [ mab5 ] is true for @xmath568 and the limit as @xmath569 yields the desired result . in this appendix we discuss results pertaining to bounds on the eigenvalues of non - hermitian matrices in terms of their real and imaginary parts . we also discuss a phenomenon , which we call _ modal dichotomy _ , that occurs for any non - hermitian matrix with a non - invertible imaginary part which is large in comparison to the real part of the matrix . the bounds and dichotomy described here are extremely useful tools in studying the spectral properties of dissipative systems especially for composite systems with high - loss and lossless components . recall , any square matrix @xmath106 can be written as the sum of a hermitian matrix and a skew - hermitian matrix,@xmath570 the real and imaginary parts of @xmath106 , respectively , and @xmath571 is the conjugate transpose of the matrix @xmath106 . for the set of @xmath572 matrices , denote by @xmath231 the operator norm@xmath573 where @xmath574 and @xmath112 denotes the standard euclidean inner product on @xmath575 column vectors with entries in @xmath576 . denote the spectrum of a square matrix @xmath106 by @xmath577 . recall in the case @xmath106 is a hermitian matrix , i.e. , @xmath578 , or a normal matrix , i.e. , @xmath579 , that @xmath580 where @xmath581 and by convention @xmath582 if @xmath583 @xmath577 . the first result which we will prove here is the following proposition which gives bounds on the eigenvalues of a matrix @xmath106 in terms of @xmath584 and @xmath585 . [ eigenvalue bounds][apxpebd]let @xmath106 be a square matrix . then@xmath586 in other words , the eigenvalues of @xmath106 lie in the union of the closed discs whose centers are the eigenvalues of @xmath587 with radius @xmath588 . moreover , the imaginary part of any eigenvalue @xmath79 of @xmath106 satisfies the inequality@xmath589 for some @xmath590 depending on @xmath79 . before we proceed with the proof we will need the following perturbation result from ( * ? ? ? v.4 , p. 291 4.8 ) for non - hermitian matrices which we prove here for completeness . if @xmath591 is a square matrix with @xmath592 normal then@xmath593 let @xmath591 be a square matrix with @xmath592 normal . then@xmath594 let @xmath595 , i.e. , the resolvent set of @xmath592 . then for any @xmath596 we have@xmath597 thus if @xmath598 then the matrix @xmath599 is invertible since the neumann series @xmath600 converges to @xmath601 for any square matrix @xmath602 satisfying @xmath603 . this implies@xmath604 but the inequality@xmath605 and the fact @xmath592 is a normal matrix implies@xmath606 therefore,@xmath607 this completes the proof . [ proof of proposition [ apxpebd]]let @xmath106 be any square matrix . then @xmath608 and @xmath609 is a normal matrix . by the previous lemma this implies@xmath610 now let @xmath79 be any eigenvalue of @xmath106 . then for any corresponding eigenvector @xmath611 of unit norm@xmath612 moreover , we know there exists an eigenvalue @xmath613 of @xmath585 ( depending on @xmath79 ) such that @xmath614 hence @xmath615 the proof now follows from ( [ papxpebd1 ] ) and ( [ papxpebd2 ] ) . the next result we prove is a proposition on dichotomy of the spectrum of a non - hermitian matrix @xmath106 which we mentioned in the introduction of this appendix . in particular , the following proposition tells us that the spectrum of a matrix @xmath106 will split into two disjoint parts when the imaginary part @xmath585 is non - invertible and large `` in comparison to the real part @xmath584 . the term large '' means that the bottom of the nonzero spectrum of @xmath616 must be greater than twice the top of the spectrum of @xmath617 ( where for a square matrix @xmath232 , @xmath618 as defined in ( * ? ? ? * , p. 196 ) ) , that is , @xmath619 this of course implies @xmath620 is large " in comparison to @xmath588 since it follows from this inequality that@xmath621 [ modal dichotomy][apxtmd]let @xmath106 be any @xmath572 matrix which is non - hermitian such that its imaginary part @xmath585 is non - invertible with rank @xmath622 . denote by @xmath623 , @xmath624 , @xmath625 the nonzero eigenvalues of @xmath585 . if @xmath626 then @xmath627 where@xmath628 furthermore , there exists unique matrices @xmath629 , @xmath630 with the properties@xmath631 where @xmath632 if @xmath633 and @xmath634 if @xmath635 ( @xmath636 ) . moreover , these projection matrices have rank satisfying@xmath637 all the eigenvalues of @xmath585 by hypothesis are @xmath623 , @xmath624 , @xmath638 and @xmath639 . it follows from proposition [ apxpebd ] that@xmath640 and the imaginary part of any eigenvalue @xmath79 of @xmath106 satisfies the inequality@xmath641 for some @xmath642 depending on @xmath79 . in particular , it follows that@xmath643 where @xmath644 now suppose that @xmath645 . we will now show that @xmath646 . suppose this were not true then we could find @xmath647 which would imply for some @xmath648 with @xmath649 we have @xmath650 a contradiction . thus @xmath651 . now it follows from the spectral theory of matrices that the finite - dimensional vector space @xmath652 of @xmath575 column vectors with entries in @xmath576 can be written as the direct sum of two invariant subspaces for the matrix @xmath106,@xmath653 that is , @xmath654 is the union of the generalized eigenspaces of @xmath106 corresponding to eigenvalues in @xmath655 and @xmath656 is the union of generalized eigenspaces of @xmath106 corresponding to the eigenvalues in @xmath657 . denote the projection matrix onto @xmath654 along @xmath656 by @xmath629 , that is , the matrix satisfying @xmath658 , @xmath659 , and @xmath660 . then it follows from the spectral theory of matrices that @xmath629 and @xmath661 are the unique matrices with the properties@xmath662 now it follows that @xmath663 so that to complete the proof of this proposition we need only show that@xmath664 in order to prove this we begin by giving an explicit representation of the matrix @xmath629 in terms of the resolvent of @xmath106 which is defined as @xmath665 to do this we define @xmath666 we will now prove that@xmath667 first , we notice that @xmath668 which proves @xmath669 . next , we have that if @xmath670 then for any @xmath623 with @xmath671 , @xmath672 implying that @xmath673 @xmath674 . this proves @xmath675 . it now follows from the cauchy - riesz functional calculus @xcite that@xmath676 where the contour integral is over the simply closed positively oriented path @xmath677 , @xmath678 . now we consider the family of matrices@xmath679 notice that for @xmath680 we have@xmath681 it follows from this that the results proven so far in this theorem for the matrix @xmath106 apply to the matrix @xmath682 for each @xmath683 $ ] . in particular , for each @xmath684 $ ] we have @xmath685 where@xmath686 furthermore , there exists unique matrices @xmath687 , @xmath688 with the properties@xmath689 moreover , @xmath690 it follows from these facts that @xmath687 is a continuous matrix projection - valued function of @xmath339 in @xmath691 $ ] and@xmath692 where @xmath693 denotes the trace of a square matrix . but @xmath694 is a continuous function of @xmath339 since @xmath687 is a continuous matrix - valued function implying @xmath695 is a continuous function of @xmath339 taking values in the nonnegative integers only . from this we conclude @xmath695 is constant for @xmath696 @xmath691 $ ] . in particular , @xmath697 moreover,@xmath698 but this implies that@xmath699 this completes the proof . we conclude this appendix by giving an alternative characterization of the subsets @xmath655 and @xmath674 from theorem [ apxtmd ] in terms of the magnitude of the imaginary parts of the eigenvalues of @xmath106 . in particular , the next corollary tells us that if the @xmath585 is associated with losses and if the imaginary part of the eigenvalues of @xmath106 are associated with damping then only the eigenmodes with eigenvalues in @xmath674 are susceptible to large damping , relative to the norm of @xmath584 , when losses are large . [ apxcmd]if @xmath645 then@xmath700 by theorem [ apxtmd ] we know that@xmath701 where@xmath702 and @xmath623 , @xmath624 , @xmath638 are the nonzero eigenvalues of @xmath585 . in particular , these facts imply immediately that@xmath703 now if @xmath704 then there exists a nonzero eigenvalue @xmath613 of @xmath585 such that@xmath705 which by the hypothesis @xmath645 implies@xmath706 the corollary follows immediately now from these facts . the term of _ energetics _ refers to a fundamental set up for a system evolution when two energies are defined for any system configuration , namely the _ kinetic energy _ and the _ potential energy_. here is a concise description of the energetics given by h. poincar , @xcite : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the difficulties inherent in the classic mechanics have led certain minds to prefer a new system they call _ energetics_. energetics took its rise as an outcome of the discovery of the principle of the conservation of energy . helmholtz gave it its final form . it begins by defining two quantities which play the fundamental role in this theory . they are _ kinetic energy , or vis viva _ , and _ potential energy_. all the changes which bodies in nature can undergo are regulated by two experimental laws : 1@xmath707 . the sum of kinetic energy and potential energy is constant . this is the principle of the conservation of energy . if a system of bodies is at @xmath232 at the time @xmath708 and at @xmath99 at the time @xmath709 , it always goes from the first situation to the second in such a way that the mean value of the difference between the two sorts of energy , in the interval of time which separates the two epochs @xmath708 and @xmath709 , may be as small as possible . this is hamilton s principle , which is one of the forms of the principle of least action . " _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ in other words according to energetics the kinetic and potential energies @xmath48 and @xmath49 that are related to the lagrangian @xmath3 and the total energy @xmath50 by the following relations@xmath710 implying@xmath711 we assume the total energy to be equal to the hamiltonian , that is to be defined by the lagrangian through the legendre transformation@xmath712 then we arrive at the following uniquely defined expressions for the kinetic and potential energies@xmath713 we are particularly interested in the case of the quadratic lagrangian@xmath714 where @xmath89 and @xmath90 are real symmetric matrices which are positive definite and positive semidefinite , respectively , and @xmath9 is a real skew - symmetric matrix , that is@xmath715 then according to ( [ lagham3 ] ) the total energy @xmath50 the takes the form@xmath716 consequently , as it follows from ( [ lagham2 ] ) the kinetic and the potential energies are defined by@xmath717 the euler - lagrange equations corresponding to the quadratic lagrangian ( [ lagham5 ] ) are @xmath718 multiplying the above equation by @xmath719 from the left yields@xmath720 and this equation can be recast recast as@xmath721 combining the above equation with ( [ lagham2 ] ) and ( [ lagham5 ] ) we arrive at the following important identity that holds for any solution @xmath77 to the euler - lagrange equation ( [ lagham9])@xmath722 where the term @xmath723 is often referred to as the _ virial_. let us introduce now the time average @xmath724 for a time dependent quantity @xmath725 defined by@xmath726 and observe that if @xmath123 is bounded for @xmath727 then @xmath728 notice now that in the case of interest when @xmath729 and consequently @xmath730 , all eigenfrequencies of the system are real and hence all solutions to the euler - lagrange equation ( [ lagham10 ] ) are bounded . consequently , applying the relation ( [ ftaver2 ] ) , using the identity ( [ lagham12 ] ) we obtain the virial theorem:@xmath731 * acknowledgment and disclaimer : * the research of a. figotin was supported through dr . a. nachman of the u.s . air force office of scientific research ( afosr ) , under grant number fa9550 - 11 - 1 - 0163 . both authors are indebted to the referee for his valuable comments on our original paper . v. i. arnold , _ mathematical methods of classical mechanics _ , translated from the russian by k. vogtmann and a. weinstein , second edition , graduate texts in mathematics , 60 , springer - verlag , new york , 1989 . Abstract:
[ "using a lagrangian mechanics approach , we construct a framework to study the dissipative properties of systems composed of two components one of which is highly lossy and the other is lossless . we have shown in our previous work that for such a composite system the modes split into two distinct classes , high - loss and low - loss , according to their dissipative behavior . a principal result of this paper is that for any such dissipative lagrangian system , with losses accounted by a rayleigh dissipative function , a rather universal phenomenon occurs , namely , _ selective overdamping _ : the high - loss modes are all overdamped , i.e. , non - oscillatory , as are an equal number of low - loss modes , but the rest of the low - loss modes remain oscillatory each with an extremely high quality factor that actually increases as the loss of the lossy component increases . we prove this result using a new time dynamical characterization of overdamping in terms of a virial theorem for dissipative systems and the breaking of an equipartition of energy ." ]
19,181
19,181
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the electrons that carry charge current in electronic circuits also have spins . in non - ferromagnetic samples , the spins are usually randomly oriented and do not play a role in the behavior of the device . however , when ferromagnetic components are incorporated into a device , the flowing electrons can become partially spin polarized and these spins can play an important role in device function . due to spin - based interactions between the ferromagnets and electrons , the orientations of the magnetization for ferromagnetic elements can determine the amount of current flow . by means of these same interactions , the electron spins can also influence the orientations of the magnetizations . this last effect , the so - called spin transfer torque , is the topic of the following series of articles . the goal of these articles is to provide an introduction to the topical scientific issues concerning the theories , experiments , and commercial applications related to spin transfer torques . these articles are written by some of the leaders in the study of spin transfer torques and we hope that they will be useful to beginning students starting their study as well as of interest to experts in the field . the authors of the succeeding articles were asked to consider the field from their particular point of view , and to provide a `` preview '' including discussion of interesting unsolved problems rather than merely a review of completed work . hopefully , when taken together these articles provide a broad and representative view of where the field is and where it may be going . the goal of the present article is to provide basic background and context for the succeeding articles . we start with a very brief history of the field and provide references to background material . then , in section [ sec : ferro ] , we introduce aspects of ferromagnetism that are important to the discussion , particularly for transition - metal ferromagnets , and discuss how spin polarized currents arise . section [ sec : stt ] describes how spin transfer torques can be understood as resulting from changes in spin currents . section [ sec : multi ] explains some of the issues associated with how spin transfer torques affect magnetic - multilayer devices and tunnel junctions . section [ sec : wires ] describes how they affect domain walls in magnetic nanowires . finally , section [ sec : outlook ] introduces the succeeding articles in the context provided by the rest of this article . the first work to consider the existence of spin transfer torques occurred in the late 1970 s and 1980 s , with berger s prediction that spin transfer torques should be able to move magnetic domain walls @xcite , followed by his group s experimental observations of domain - wall motion in thin ferromagnetic films under the influence of large current pulses @xcite . the phenomenon did not attract a great deal of attention at the time , largely because very large currents ( up to 45 a ! ) were required , given that the samples were quite wide on the scale of mm . however , with advances in nanofabrication techniques , magnetic wires with 100 nm widths can now be made readily , and these exhibit domain wall motion at currents of a few ma and below . research on spin - transfer - induced domain wall motion has been pursued vigorously by many groups since the early days of the 21st century @xcite . the present state of studies of spin - torque - driven domain wall motion is described in the articles by beach , tsoi , and erskine , by tserkovnyak , brataas , and bauer , and by ohno and dietl . widespread interest in magnetic nanostructures began in 1986 with the discovery of interlayer exchange coupling @xcite . interlayer exchange coupling @xcite is the interaction between the magnetizations of two ferromagnetic layer separated by an ultrathin , non - ferromagnetic spacer layer . of particular interest was the discovery of antiferromagnetic coupling in the fe / cr / fe system by grnberg et al . because it led shortly thereafter to the discovery of the giant magnetoresistance ( gmr ) effect by grnberg s group and fert s group @xcite . grnberg and fert shared the 2007 nobel prize in physics for this discovery . gmr is the change in resistance that occurs when the relative orientation of the magnetizations in two ferromagnetic layers changes . for example , when the magnetizations of two fe layers separated by cr are antiparallel to each other as they are when antiferromagnetically coupled , the sample has a relatively large resistance . the magnetizations of the fe layers can be brought into parallel alignment by an external magnetic field , and this decreases the resistance . at intermediate angles , the resistance is also intermediate between these maximum and minimum values . see fig . [ fig : gmr ] . the overall size of the change in resistance is typically up to a few 10 s of percent , which is `` giant '' compared to the @xmath0 1 % magnetoresistance changes of pure magnetic metals by themselves ( due to anisotropic magnetoresistance @xcite ) . most of the early work on gmr focused on the sample geometry in which the current flows in the plane ( cip ) of the multilayer sample . another geometry , first explored in 1991 @xcite has the current flow perpendicular to the planes ( cpp ) of the multilayer and gives larger fractional resistance changes @xcite . the cpp geometry is of particular interest in the present context because spin transfer effects are more important than they are in the cip geometry . in studying the gmr effect , et al_. discovered in 1990 that the interlayer exchange coupling oscillates as a function of the thickness of the spacer layer @xcite . the oscillations could be quite dramatic ; up to sixty changes in sign of the coupling were seen in single wedge - shaped samples allowing the simultaneous study of a range of thicknesses @xcite . comparison of the oscillations with calculations @xcite confirmed that this coupling was an exchange interaction mediated by the electrons in the spacer layer and that the oscillation periods were determined by the geometry of the spacer layer s fermi surface . in 1989 , slonczewski @xcite calculated the interlayer exchange coupling for the case in which the spacer layer is an insulating tunnel barrier . while there were no measurements of exchange coupling across insulators at the time , his article has two features of particular interest in regard to spin - torque physics . first , slonczewski calculated the exchange coupling by determining the spin current flowing through the tunnel barrier . a spin current flows even with zero applied bias across the tunnel junction whenever the magnetizations of the two electrodes are non - collinear , and the source of the exchange coupling can be understood to be the transfer of angular momentum from this spin current to each magnet . the second feature of interest is that he considered the additional coupling that results when a voltage is applied across the junction . this was the first calculation of a spin transfer torque in a multilayer geometry with current flowing perpendicular to the plane . however , there was little immediate experimental follow - up , because the technology for making magnetic tunnel junctions at that time was still rather primitive , and provided only tunnel barriers that were too thick to permit the large current densities needed to excite spin - torque - driven magnetic dynamics . the papers most influential in launching the study of spin transfer torques came in 1996 , when slonczewski @xcite and berger @xcite independently predicted that current flowing perpendicular to the plane in a metallic multilayer can generate a spin transfer torque strong enough to reorient the magnetization in one of the layers . since the metallic magnetic multilayers used for gmr studies have low resistances ( compared to tunnel barriers ) , they could easily sustain the current densities required for spin transfer torques to be important . slonczewski predicted that the spin transfer torque from a direct current could excite two qualitatively different types of magnetic behaviors depending on the device design and the magnitude of an applied magnetic field : either simple switching from one static magnetic orientation to another or a dynamical state in which the magnetization undergoes steady - state precession . his subsequent 1997 patent @xcite was remarkably far - seeing , providing detailed predictions for many of the applications that are currently being pursued . measurements of current - induced resistance changes in magnetic multilayer devices were first identified with spin - torque - driven excitations in 1998 by tsoi _ et al_. , for devices consisting of a mechanical point contact to a metallic multilayer @xcite , and in 1999 by sun in manganite devices @xcite . observation of magnetization reversal caused by spin torques in lithographically defined samples occurred shortly thereafter @xcite . [ fig : switching ] shows comparisons between spin - torque - driven magnetic switching and magnetic - field driven switching for a metallic multilayer and a magnetic tunnel junction . phase - locking between spin - torque - driven magnetic precession and an alternating magnetic field was detected in 2000 @xcite and direct measurements of steady - state high - frequency magnetic precession caused by spin torque from a direct current were made beginning in 2003 @xcite . figure [ fig : oscil ] shows an example of voltage oscillations due to spin - torque - driven magnetic precession . the article by berkov and miltat describes some of these results and shows to what extent it is currently possible to make a detailed comparison between theory and experiment . the article by silva and rippard discusses some of the open questions pertaining to spin - torque - driven precession in the point - contact sample geometry . at the same time that interest was beginning to grow regarding spin transfer torques in metallic multilayers , so was the interest in magnetic tunnel junctions , starting with the observation in 1995 of substantial tunnel magnetoresistance ( tmr , the difference in resistance between parallel and antiparallel orientation for the electrode magnetizations of a magnetic tunnel junction ) at room temperature @xcite . most of the early studies used aluminum oxide as a tunnel barrier . since aluminum oxide barriers are heavily disordered it is difficult to study them theoretically . in 2001 , et al_. and mathon and umerski calculated the tunneling properties of the fe / mgo / fe system @xcite , which can be lattice - matched and potentially well - ordered . they found that the symmetry of the system and the relevant electronic states lead to the possibility of an extremely large tmr . in 2004 , values of tmr greater than those observed for aluminum oxide barriers were published @xcite and the values of tmr demonstrated experimentally have continued to increase rapidly until this day . techniques have now been developed to make both aluminum oxide and mgo tunnel barriers sufficiently thin to support the current densities needed to produce magnetic switching with spin transfer torques @xcite . work is underway to investigate spin - torque - driven precession in tunnel barriers , as well . one reason for the interest in spin - torque effects in tunnel junctions is that tunnel junctions are better - suited than metallic magnetic multilayers for many types of applications . tunnel junctions have higher resistances that can often be better impedance - matched to silicon - based electronics , and tmr values can now be made larger than the gmr values in metallic devices . the science and technology of spin transfer torques in tunnel junctions are discussed in the articles by katine and fullerton and by sun and ralph . the possibility of commercial application has been a strong driving force in this field from the beginning . grnberg @xcite filed a german patent for applications of gmr in 1988 even before the effect was published in the scientific literature , and the phrase `` giant magnetoresistance '' now appears in over 1500 us patents . devices based on the gmr and tmr effects have already found very widespread application as the magnetic - field sensors in the read heads of magnetic hard disk drives , and a non - volatile random access memory based on magnetic tunnel junctions has recently been introduced . slonczewski s 1997 patent @xcite for devices based on spin transfer torques has been referenced by 64 subsequent patents . applications of spin transfer torques are envisioned using both types of magnetic dynamics that spin torques can excite . magnetic switching driven by the spin transfer effect can be much more efficient than switching driven by current - induced magnetic fields ( the mechanism used in the existing magnetic random access memory ) . this may enable the production of magnetic memory devices with much lower switching currents and hence greater energy efficiency and also greater device density than field - switched devices . the steady - state magnetic precession mode that can be excited by spin transfer is under investigation for a number of high - frequency applications , for example nanometer - scale frequency - tunable microwave sources , detectors , mixers , and phase shifters . one potential area of use is for short - range chip - to - chip or even within - chip communications . spin - torque - driven domain wall motion is also under investigation for memory applications . parkin has proposed a `` racetrack memory '' @xcite which envisions storing bits of information using many domains arranged sequentially in a magnetic nanowire and retrieving the information by using spin transfer torques to move the domains through a read - out sensor . the article by katine and fullerton discusses in detail the opportunities and challenges for potential applications . there are several books that can provide more background information for this set of articles on spin transfer torques . one resource is the four volume series _ ultrathin magnetic structures _ edited by heinrich and bland @xcite . these volumes contain articles on almost all aspects of magnetic thin films and devices made out of them . another useful book , written at a more pedagogical level , is _ nanomagnetism : ultrathin films , multilayers and nanostructures _ , edited by mills and bland @xcite . the three volume series _ spin dynamics in confined magnetic structures _ edited by hillebrands , ounadjela , and thiaville covers dynamical aspects of magnetic nanostructures @xcite . the five volume set , handbook of magnetism and advanced magnetic materials , edited by kronmller and parkin , covers the entire field of magnetism including the topics of interest here @xcite . _ concepts in spin electronics _ , edited by maekawa , provides another recent overview @xcite . finally , the journal of magnetism and magnetic materials published a collection of review articles including several on topics related to magnetic multilayers in volume 200 @xcite . specific chapters in these books and other review articles on spin transfer torques will be mentioned throughout this article . _ the origin of ferromagnetism . _ ferromagnetism occurs when an electron system becomes spontaneously spin polarized . in transition metals , ferromagnetism results from a balance between atomic - like exchange interactions , which tend to align spins , and inter - atomic hybridization , which tends to reduce spin polarization . an accurate accounting of both effects is quite difficult @xcite . however , a qualitative understanding is straightforward . in isolated atoms , hund s rules describe how to put electrons into nearly degenerate atomic levels to minimize the energy . hund s first rule says to maximize the spin , that is , to put in as many electrons with spins in one direction into a partially filled atomic orbital before you start adding spins in the other direction . the energy gain that motivates hund s rule is that pauli exclusion keeps electrons with the same spin further apart on average , thereby lowering the coulomb repulsion between them . this energy is called the atomic exchange energy . in accordance with hund s first rule , essentially all isolated atoms with partially filled orbital levels have non - zero spin moments . non - zero values of orbital angular momentum can also contribute to the magnetic moment of isolated atoms . in solids , on the other hand , electron states on neighboring atoms hybridize and form bands . band formation acts to suppress the formation of magnetic moments in two ways . first , hybridization breaks spherical symmetry for the environment of each atom , which tends to quench any orbital component of the magnetic moment . second , band formation also inhibits spin polarization . if one starts with a system of unpolarized electrons and imagines flipping spins to create alignment , then there is a kinetic - energy cost associated with moving electrons from lower - energy filled band states to higher - energy unoccupied band states . as a result , most solids are not ferromagnetic . there are , of course , exceptions . for example in materials with tightly bound 4f - orbitals , the hybridization is so weak that those levels do become spin polarized much as they do in the atomic state . the transition metal ferromagnets iron , cobalt , nickel , and their alloys , having partially filled d - orbitals , are the exceptions of particular interest in these articles . the transition metal ferromagnets have both strong exchange splitting and strong hybridization . the exchange splitting can stabilize a spin - polarized ferromagnetic state , even in the presence of band formation , by generating a self - consistent shift of the majority - electron - spin band states to lower energy than the minority - electron - spin states , so as to more than compensate for the kinetic - energy cost associated with the formation of the polarization . _ models of ferromagnetic materials . _ the local spin density approximation ( lsda ) @xcite accurately describes much of the important physics in these systems . it treats the atomic - like exchange and correlation effects in mean field theory and treats the hybridization exactly . without any fitting parameters it accurately predicts @xcite many of the properties of transition metal ferromagnets like the magnetic moment . in this approach , the electron density and spin density are the fundamental degrees of freedom and the wave functions are formal constructs that allow calculation of the density . as such , there is no formal justification for using the lsda wave functions as the physical wave functions . however , the wave functions are a solution to an accurate mean field theory ( lsda ) and in practice they can serve as a good approximation to the real wave functions in many cases . many calculations of spin transfer torques are based on using the wave functions found from the lsda ; see in particular the article from haney , duine , nez , and macdonald for examples . there are two simplified models of ferromagnetism that are sometimes used to give descriptions of the physics of spin transfer torques and for calculations . the first is the free - electron stoner model . this assumes that the electron bands for spin - up and spin - down electrons have a relative shift in energy due to an exchange interaction but otherwise they both have a free - electron dispersion , @xmath1 . here @xmath2 is the pauli spin matrix and @xmath3 is the exchange splitting . the second simplified model is the s - d model . it was originally introduced @xcite to describe local moment impurities in a non - magnetic host . the `` s '' electrons describe the delocalized conduction band states of the host and the `` d '' electrons describe the localized magnetic states , which are weakly coupled to the s electrons . frequently , each d electron shell is treated as a local moment @xmath4 , which interacts with the conduction - electron spin density @xmath5 through a weak local interaction @xmath6 . neither the stoner model nor the s - d model are well - justified approximations for describing the transition - metal ferromagnets . see fig . [ fig : bs ] for a comparison of the band structures of these two models with a more realistic band structure for co computed using the lsda . the simplified models can be very useful for illustrating physical concepts , and sometimes for estimates , but they are far from realistic . the band structure in transition - metal ferromagnets is considerably more complicated than that of a single free - electron band as assumed in the stoner model . as for comparisons to the s - d model , in real materials the hybridization within the d bands and of the d bands with the s bands are quite strong , and so the d electrons can not be considered localized . on the other hand , the s - d model is one of several models that have been used to describe ferromagnetic semiconductors , like those discussed in the article by ohno and dietl . in these systems , the mn substitutions are believed to act very much like local moments . the origins of spin - polarized currents in magnetic devices and the giant magnetoresistance ( gmr ) effect can be understood as consequences of the difference in band structures for the majority - spin and minority - spin states in magnets , as predicted by lsda calculations and illustrated in a over - simplified way by the exchange splitting in the free - electron stoner model . spin - polarized currents can come about because the spin - dependent electron properties in ferromagnets allow magnetic thin films to act like spin filters . consider the example of cr / fe multilayers in which gmr was first discovered . for electrons incident from cr into a fe layer , minority spins have a greater probability to be transmitted through the fe film than majority spins , due to differences scattering caused by the band - structure mismatch at the interface and also due to band - structure - induced differences in the strength of scattering from defects and impurities in the fe layer @xcite . therefore the current transmitted through the fe layer in a cr / fe / cr device is partially spin - polarized in the minority direction , while the current reflected from the layer is partially polarized in the majority direction . many other factors can also affect the ultimate polarization of the currents , including the layer thickness and the spin flip scattering rates . once in a non - ferromagnetic metal like cr or cu , a spin - polarized current persists on the scale of the spin diffusion length , typically on the order of 100 nm or more in cu and about 5 nm in cr . when two fe layers in a cr / fe multilayer are spaced more closely than this and have parallel magnetic moments , minority electrons have a high probability of being transmitted through both layers , resulting in a relatively low overall device resistance even though the majority electrons are scattered strongly . in effect , the minority electrons `` short out '' the structure , giving a low resistance . when nearby magnetic layers have antiparallel moments , both majority and minority electrons scatter strongly in either one layer or the other , and the resulting resistance is higher . this is the origin of gmr . other combinations of normal metals and magnetic layers can act similarly , although for combinations like cu / co or cu / ni it is the majority electrons that are more easily transmitted through the magnetic layer , rather than the minority electrons @xcite . a number of different theoretical approaches have been used to calculate the transport properties of magnetic multilayers and their gmr @xcite . these techniques will be discussed in more detail in section [ sec : multi ] . _ micromagnetics . _ in order to describe the equilibrium configuration of the magnetization in a ferromagnet , or the dynamical response to an applied magnetic field or a spin - transfer torque , it can be important to take into account that the magnetization distribution may become spatially non - uniform . micromagnetics @xcite is a phenomenological description of magnetism on a mesoscopic length scale designed to model such non - uniformities in an efficient way . it does not attempt to describe the behavior of the moment associated with each atom , but rather adopts a continuum description much like elasticity theory . its utility arises because the length scales of interest in magnetic studies are frequently much longer than atomic lengths . atomic scale calculations become impractical in this case . in equilibrium , the magnetization direction aligns itself with an effective field , which can vary as a function of position . there are generally four main contributions to this effective field : the externally applied magnetic field , magnetocrystalline anisotropy , micromagnetic exchange , and the magnetostatic field . each of the fields is most easily described in terms of an associated contribution to the free energy . the total effective field is then the functional derivative of the free energy with respect to the magnetization @xmath7 . the magnetocrystalline anisotropy arises from the spin - orbit interactions and tends to align the magnetization with particular lattice directions . generally speaking the anisotropy field is a local function of the magnetization direction and has a different functional form for different lattices and materials . the micromagnetic exchange @xcite is the interaction that tends to keep the magnetization aligned in a common direction , adding an energy cost when the magnetization rotates as a function of position . the magnetostatic interaction is a highly non - local interaction between the magnetization at different points mediated by the magnetic field produced by the magnetization . together , the four free energies can be written @xmath8 where @xmath9 , @xmath10 , @xmath11 is the saturation magnetization , @xmath12 is the exchange constant , and @xmath13 is the anisotropy constant . here we have taken the specific example of a uniaxial anisotropy with an easy axis along @xmath14 . the total effective field derived from eq . ( [ eq : mumage ] ) is @xmath15 the atomic - like exchange , which drives the formation of the magnetization and which is not explicit in these expressions , places a strong energetic penalty on deviations of the magnitude of @xmath16 away from @xmath11 . this interaction is generally taken into account by treating @xmath16 as having the fixed length @xmath11 . _ magnetic domains . _ the interactions within eqs . ( [ eq : mumage ] ) and ( [ eq : mumagh ] ) can compete with one another in determining the orientation of @xmath17 as a function of position . different interactions can dominate on different spatial scales , with the consequence that the magnetic ground state is often spatially non - uniform , containing non - trivial magnetization patterns even in equilibrium . the micromagnetic exchange and magnetocrystalline anisotropy both represent relatively short - ranged or local interactions . the micromagnetic exchange tends to keep the magnetization spatially uniform and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy can tend to keep it directed in particular lattice directions . for the energy functional above , with uniaxial anisotropy , those directions are @xmath18 . for the materials of interest for spin transfer applications the magnetocrystalline anisotropy is frequently weak and does not play an important role ( although there are exceptions @xcite ) . anisotropies in spin transfer devices are more commonly the result of the sample shape . magnetostatic interactions favor magnetization orientations aligned in the plane of thin - film samples and along the long axis of samples with non - circular cross - sections . because of the dipole pattern of long - ranged magnetic fields , the magnetostatic interaction can also favor antiparallel alignment of the magnetization in distant parts of a sample , and this can cause the magnetization pattern to become non - uniform . on short length scales the magnetostatic interaction is relatively weak in comparison to micromagnetic exchange . however the magnetostatic interaction is long - ranged so that it can eventually dominate in large enough samples . this causes the magnetization pattern to depend on the sample size . for magnetic thin - film samples smaller than about 100 nm to 200 nm in diameter , the ground state is approximately ( but not exactly ) uniform , with the micromagnetic exchange dominating the magnetostatic interactions @xcite . for samples slightly bigger than this , magnetostatic interactions become more important and the ground state can be a vortex state . for still larger samples , the magnetization pattern may break up into regions which have different magnetic orientations but within which the magnetization is roughly uniform . these regions are called domains @xcite . the border region between domains is referred to as a domain wall . here the magnetization rotates over a relatively short distance from one domain s orientation to the other s . the more gradual is this rotation , the less the cost in exchange energy . however , wider domain walls deviate from the low - energy orientation for magnetocrystalline anisotropy over a larger volume , and therefore cost more anisotropy energy . the domain wall width is determined by a compromise which minimizes the total energy of exchange + anisotropy , and can be characterized roughly by the scale @xmath19 . this length is strongly material dependent , ranging from @xmath0 1 nm for hard magnetic materials to more than 100 nm for soft magnetic materials . in cases with weak anisotropy , domain wall widths are determined by a competition between exchange and magnetostatic interactions . the domain wall width can also depend on sample geometry , and in a narrow contact between electrodes the wall width can be narrowed in proportion to the contact diameter @xcite . in thin - film wires , typical of those used to study current - induced domain wall motion , domain walls typically take one of two structures , `` transverse '' walls or `` vortex '' walls . on either side of the wall , the magnetization lies in - plane and points along the length of the wire to minimize the magnetostatic energy , and there is a net 180@xmath20 rotation of the magnetization at the wall . in a transverse wall , the magnetization simply rotates in the plane of the sample from one domain to the other . however , the competition between the micromagnetic exchange energy and the magnetostatic energy causes the wall width to be narrow ( on the scale of the exchange length , @xmath21 4 nm to 8 nm , where @xmath12 is the prefactor of the micromagnetic exchange in eq . ( [ eq : mumage ] ) and @xmath11 is the saturation magnetization ) on one edge of the wire and wide ( on the scale of the width of the wire ) on the other edge . a vortex wall is even more complicated . here , the magnetization wraps around a central singularity @xcite , the vortex core , giving a circulating pattern to the magnetization . the competition between these two wall structures is studied in ref . beach , tsoi , and erskine describe how the detailed structure of domain walls plays a crucial role in their motion when they are driven by either an applied magnetic field or a spin transfer torque . _ magnetic dynamics in the absence of spin transfer torques . _ when a magnetic configuration is away from equilibrium , the magnetization precesses around the instantaneous local effective field . in the absence of dissipation , the magnetization distribution stays on a constant energy surface . in order to account for energy loss , landau and lifshitz @xcite introduced a phenomenological damping term into the equation of motion and gilbert @xcite introduced a slightly different form several decades later . both forms of the damping move the local magnetization vector toward the local effective field direction : @xmath22 where @xmath23 is the gyromagnetic ratio , @xmath24 is the landau - lifshitz damping parameter , and @xmath25 is the gilbert damping parameter . these two forms are known to be equivalent with the substitutions , @xmath26 and @xmath27 . in spite of this equivalence , there has been an ongoing debate about which is more correct . this debate has been rekindled with the interest in current - driven domain wall motion ( one of the present authors is guilty of contributing to the debate ) and is mentioned in the articles by tserkovnyak , brataas , and bauer and by berkov and miltat . part of the fervor of the debate arises from the fact that it is not experimentally testable . appropriate equations of motion can be formulated with either form of damping at the expense of slight modifications to other terms in the equation of motion . this point is discussed further in sec . [ sec : wires ] . note that both the precession and damping terms rotate the magnetization , but do not change its length . this is consistent with treating the magnetization as having a fixed length . there have been many attempts to compute the damping parameters from models for various physics processes @xcite . some mechanisms are intrinsic to the material , such as those due to magnetoelastic scattering @xcite , and others are considered extrinsic like two - magnon scattering from inhomogeneities @xcite . it appears that a model due to kambersky @xcite for electron - hole pair generation describes the dominant source of intrinsic damping in a variety of metallic systems including the ferromagnetic semiconductors @xcite and transition metals @xcite primarily of interest for spin transfer torque applications . for a magnetic element in metallic contact with other materials , there can also be a contribution to the damping from `` spin - pumping '' the emission of spin - angular momentum from the precessing magnet via the conduction electrons @xcite . magnetization dynamics is most easily investigated using the macrospin approximation . the macrospin approximation assumes that the magnetization of a sample stays spatially uniform throughout its motion and can be treated as a single macroscopic spin . since the spatial variation of the magnetization is frozen out , exploring the dynamics of magnetic systems is much more tractable using the macrospin approximation than it is using full micromagnetic simulations . the macrospin model makes it easy to explore the phase space of different torque models , and it has been a very useful tool for gaining a zeroth - order understanding of spin - torque physics . however , for many systems of interest , even ones with very small magnetic elements , the macrospin approximation breaks down . for a full understanding of magnetic dynamics , a micromagnetic approach is therefore necessary . the article by berkov and miltat discusses some of the circumstances in which the macrospin approach is and is not a reasonable approximation to the true dynamics . for analyses of magnetic domain wall dynamics , there is a different simplified description that can sometimes be useful for qualitative understanding , as an alternative to full micromagnetic calculations . the walker ansatz @xcite restricts the variation in the domain wall to uniform translations , uniform rotations out of plane , and in some versions a uniform scaling of the wall width . for the simplest version , the dynamics of the domain wall can then be described by two degrees of freedom . the article by beach , tsoi and erskine discusses when this approximation is valid and when it is not for current - induced domain wall motion . in some situations it is useful to consider the dynamics of a magnetic sample in terms of the normal modes of the system , known as spin waves or magnons , instead of directly integrating the equations of motion at every point on a closely spaced grid designed to model the sample , as is usually done in micromagnetic calculations . a spin wave is a small amplitude oscillation of the magnetization around its average direction . in macroscopic magnetic systems , the spectrum of spin waves is essentially continuous as a function of frequency , but when thin - film magnetic elements are shrunk to the scale of 100 nm in diameter , the spin wave spectrum becomes measurably discrete @xcite . in fact , the recent development of spin - transfer - driven ferromagnetic resonance has made it possible to measure the frequencies of these normal modes within individual nanostructures @xcite . interestingly , calculations show that uniform precession , of the type assumed in the macrospin approximation , is generally not a true normal mode because the magnetostatic field is generally not uniform across the sample . an analysis in terms of the normal modes can provide a strategy for simulating magnetic dynamics that is more efficient than standard micromagnetic simulations and somewhat more accurate than the macrospin approximation . the dynamics of a magnetic excitation can be approximated by expanding the excitation using a finite set of normal modes as a basis set , and determining the time dependence based on the dynamics of the individual modes and their nonlinear couplings , rather than by integrating the full equation of motion directly . in cases when the lowest - frequency most - spatially uniform normal mode dominates the magnetic dynamics , the results are typically very similar to the predictions of the simplest macrospin descriptions . the relevance of the spin wave modes is discussed in the articles by berkov and miltat and by sun and ralph . thus far we have discussed the dynamics of magnets in the absence of the spin transfer torque . spin transfer torques arise whenever the flow of spin - angular momentum through a sample is not constant , but has sources or sinks . this happens , for example , whenever a spin current ( created by spin filtering from one magnetic thin film ) is filtered again by another magnetic thin film whose moment is not collinear with the first . in the process of filtering , the second magnet necessarily absorbs a portion of the spin angular momentum that is carried by the electron spins . changes in the flow of spin angular momentum also occur when spin - polarized electrons pass through a magnetic domain wall or any other spatially non - uniform magnetization distribution . in this process , the spins of the charge carriers rotate to follow the local magnetization , so the spin vector of the angular momentum flow changes as a function of position . in either of these cases , the magnetization of the ferromagnet changes the flow of spin angular momentum by exerting a torque on the flowing spins to reorient them , and therefore the flowing electrons must exert an equal and opposite torque on the ferromagnet . this torque that is applied by non - equilibrium conduction electrons onto a ferromagnet is what we will call the spin transfer torque . its strength can be calculated either by considering directly the mutual precession of the electron spin and magnetic moment during their interaction ( an approach discussed in the article by haney , duine , nez , and macdonald ) or by considering the net change in the spin current before and after the interaction ( the approach we will emphasize ) . our discussion in this section will consist of two parts . first we will consider how it is that a spin - polarized current can apply a torque to a ferromagnet . this will be straightforward since a torque is simply a time rate of change of angular momentum , considerations of angular momentum conservation can be used to relate the spin transfer torque directly to the angular momentum lost or gained by spin currents . we will use two simple toy models to illustrate some of the physics involved in this process . the second part of our discussion will describe how to incorporate the spin transfer torque into the equation of motion for the magnetization dynamics . this step of the argument will involve some more - subtle points , related to the connection between the magnetization of a ferromagnet and its total angular momentum . to explore these points fully , we will consider how one might derive the equation of motion for the magnetization , @xmath28 , within a rigorous quantum mechanical theory . _ definition of the spin current density . _ the primary quantity on which we will focus our interest will be the spin current density @xmath29 . this has both a direction in spin space and a direction of flow in real space , so it is a tensor quantity . for a single electron , the spin current is given classically by the outer product of the average electron velocity and spin density @xmath30 . for a single - electron wavefunction @xmath31 , the spin current density may be written @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the electron mass , and @xmath34 represents the pauli matrices @xmath35 , @xmath36 , and @xmath2 . the form of the spin current density is similar to the more - familiar probability current density @xmath37 . for a spinor plane - wave wavefunction of the form @xmath38 where @xmath39 is a normalization volume , the spatial part of the spin current points in the @xmath40 direction , and the three spin components take the simple forms @xmath41 by conservation of angular momentum , one can say that the spin transfer torque acting on some volume of material can be computed simply by determining the net flux of non - equilibrium spin current through the surfaces of that volume , or equivalently by integrating the divergence of the spin current density within an imaginary pillbox surrounding the volume in question : @xmath42 where @xmath43 is the in - plane position and @xmath44 is the interface normal for each surface of the pillbox . ( note that since @xmath29 is a tensor , its dot product with a vector in real space leaves a vector in spin space . ) if one prefers to think in terms of the differential form of eq . ( [ eq : pillbox ] ) , it states that the spin torque density is the divergence of the spin current density . _ toy model # 1 . _ our first simple model is meant to illustrate that when a spin polarized current interacts with a thin ferromagnetic layer and undergoes spin filtering the result , in general , is that a spin transfer torque is applied to the magnetic layer . consider the problem of a single - electron state with wave vector @xmath45 in the @xmath46 direction and spin oriented in the @xmath40-@xmath47 plane at an angle @xmath48 with respect to the @xmath47 direction , which is incident onto a thin magnetic layer whose magnetization is pointed in the @xmath47 direction ( see fig . [ fig : toy](a ) ) . we will initially not be concerned about what goes on inside the magnetic layer , but we will account for its spin filtering properties simply by assuming that it can be described by overall transmission and reflection amplitudes for spin - up electrons ( @xmath49 , @xmath50 ) that are different from the transmission and reflection amplitudes for spin - down electrons ( @xmath51 , @xmath52 ) , and that no spin - flipping processes occur . under these assumptions , the incident part of the wavefunction is @xmath53 this can be derived , for example , by starting with the @xmath54 state and applying the appropriate rotation matrix for a spin-1/2 system @xcite . the transmitted and reflected parts of the scattering wavefunction are @xmath55 the components of the spin current density can be determined using the expressions given in eq . ( [ eq : qs ] ) . the flows of spin density in the @xmath40 spatial direction for the incident , transmitted , and reflected parts of the wavefunction take the forms @xmath56 \nonumber \\ { \bf q}_{\rm trans } & = & { \hbar^2 k \over 2m{\omega } } \sin(\theta){\rm re}(t_{\uparrow}t_{\downarrow}^ * ) { \bf \hat{x } } \nonumber\\ & & + { \hbar^2 k \over 2m{\omega } } \sin(\theta ) { \rm im}(t_{\uparrow}t_{\downarrow}^ * ) { \bf \hat{y } } \nonumber\\ & & + { \hbar^2 k \over 2m{\omega } } \big [ |t_{\uparrow}|^2 \cos^2(\theta/2)- |t_{\downarrow}|^2 \sin^2(\theta/2)\big ] { \bf \hat{z } } \\ { \bf q}_{\rm refl } & = & - { \hbar^2 k \over 2m{\omega } } \sin(\theta){\rm re}(r_{\uparrow}r_{\downarrow}^ * ) { \bf \hat{x } } \nonumber\\ & & - { \hbar^2 k \over 2m{\omega } } \sin(\theta ) { \rm im}(r_{\uparrow}r_{\downarrow}^ * ) { \bf \hat{y } } \nonumber\\ & & - { \hbar^2 k \over 2m{\omega } } \big [ |r_{\uparrow}|^2 \cos^2(\theta/2)- |r_{\downarrow}|^2 \sin^2(\theta/2)\big ] { \bf\hat{z}}. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] it is then clear that the total spin current is not conserved during the filtering process : the spin current density flowing on the left of the magnet @xmath57 is not equal to the spin current density on the right @xmath58 . by eq . ( [ eq : pillbox ] ) , we can say that the spin transfer torque @xmath59 on an area @xmath60 of the ferromagnet is equal to the net spin current transferred from the electron to the ferromagnet , and is given in this toy model by @xmath61 { \bf \hat{x } } \nonumber\\ & & - { a \over \omega}{\hbar^2 k \over 2 m } \sin(\theta ) { \rm im}(t_{\uparrow}t_{\downarrow}^ * + r_{\uparrow}r_{\downarrow}^ * ) { \bf \hat{y } } . \label{eq : model1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we have used the fact that @xmath62 and @xmath63 . there is no component of spin torque in the @xmath47 direction . we find the general result that the spin transfer torque is zero when @xmath64 and @xmath65 ( in which case the `` magnetic '' layer would provide no spin filtering ) or when the incoming spin orientation is collinear with the magnetization of the layer , @xmath66 or @xmath67 . however , for any non - collinear spin orientation , when the magnet does provide spin filtering , it is a direct consequence of the spin filtering that the spin transfer torque acting on the ferromagnetic layer is non - zero . this torque is perpendicular to the magnetization of the layer ( no @xmath68 component ) , and for an individual incident electron the torque may have components in both the @xmath46 and @xmath69 directions , depending on the values of the transmission and reflection coefficients . it is possible to extend this type of 1-d toy model to calculate the torque applied to a magnetic thin film in a realistic 3-dimensional sample . the calculation proceeds by summing the torque contributed by electron waves incident onto the magnetic thin film from throughout the fermi surface of the non - magnetic metal , corresponding to electrons incident from many directions in real space @xcite . this requires summing the contributions to the @xmath46 and @xmath70 components of the torque in eq . ( [ eq : model1 ] ) . in terms of the terminology commonly used in this field @xcite , the sum over the @xmath46-component contributions is proportional to the real part of the `` mixing conductance '' and gives the `` in - plane '' torque ( the plane defined by the moments on the ferromagnet and the incoming spin ) , and the sum over the @xmath69-component contributions is proportional to the imaginary part of the mixing conductance and gives a perpendicular torque . _ toy model # 2 . _ next we consider a second simple 1-dimensional toy model @xcite , to illustrate some of the processes that occur near a normal metal / ferromagnetic interface and influence the spin torque . here we again first assume a single incoming spin - polarized electron wavefunction of the form given by eq . ( [ eq : wavefunction ] ) incident onto a magnetic layer whose magnetization is in the @xmath47 direction . however , in this case we will use a stoner - model approach to describe the magnetic layer . that is , we will assume that the electrons inside the ferromagnetic layer experience an exchange splitting @xmath3 which shifts the states in the minority - spin band ( down electrons ) higher in energy than the majority - spin band ( up electrons ) , but that both bands have a free - electron dispersion . the physics near the interface can then be modeled as a simple scattering problem in which the electron scatters from a rectangular potential - energy step ( at position @xmath71 ) that has different heights for spin - up and spin - down electrons ( see fig . [ fig : toy](b ) ) . for simplicity , we will assume that the height of the potential - energy step is 0 for up spins and @xmath3 for down spins , and we will consider an electron energy @xmath72 which is greater than @xmath3 . by matching wavefunctions and their derivatives at the interfaces , it is an elementary problem to calculate the transmitted and reflected parts of the scattering - state wavefunction with energy eigenvalue @xmath73 : @xmath74 where @xmath75 and @xmath76^{1/2}/\hbar < k$ ] . the incident , transmitted , and reflected spin currents are @xmath77 { \bf \hat{x } } \nonumber\\ & & - { \hbar^2 \over 2m{\omega } } \sin(\theta ) k \sin[(k_{\uparrow } - k_{\downarrow})x ] { \bf \hat{y } } \\ & & + { \hbar^2 \over 2m{\omega } } \left [ k \cos^2(\theta/2)- k_{\downarrow } \left({2k \over k + k_{\downarrow}}\right)^2 \sin^2(\theta/2)\right ] { \bf \hat{z } } \nonumber \\ { \bf q}_{\rm refl } & = & { \hbar^2 \over 2m{\omega } } k \left ( { k- k_{\downarrow } \over k + k_{\downarrow } } \right)^2 \sin^2(\theta/2 ) { \bf \hat{z}}. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] there are two points of physics that we wish to illustrate with this example . first , the transverse ( perpendicular to @xmath47 ) spin component of the reflected spin current density is equal to zero . since the total spin current density is continuous at the interface , this means that all of the of the transverse component of the incident spin current density is transmitted through the interface ; none is reflected . in this toy model , this result follows from our assumption that for spin up electrons the height of the potential - energy step at the interface is zero , so that the reflection amplitude for spin up electrons is zero and the reflected part of the wavefunction is purely spin down . for models in which both components of spin experience a non - zero potential - energy step , some of the incident @xmath46 component of the spin current density will be reflected . however , for many of the materials combinations used commonly in metallic gmr devices , like cu / co , cu / ni , or cr / fe , one of the spin components actually does have a reflection amplitude close to zero over a large part of the fermi surface @xcite , so it is a reasonable approximation in these cases that almost all of the transverse ( @xmath46 ) component of the spin current density will be transmitted into the ferromagnet . the second important point of physics illustrated by the model concerns what happens to the transverse component of the spin current density after it enters the ferromagnet . the oscillatory @xmath40 and @xmath69 terms in the transmitted spin current density represent precession of the spin about the @xmath47 axis as a function of position as it penetrates through the magnet . in any model in which there is a difference in exchange energy between majority and minority spin states , the two spin components of a wavefunction for a given eigenvalue @xmath73 must have different kinetic energies , so that @xmath78 and the spin state inside the magnet will precess . the same phenomenon is therefore present in more rigorous models . one can view this effect as simply the precession of the spin in the exchange field of the magnet . the period of the precession , @xmath79 is very short for a typical transition metal ferromagnet , on the scale of a few atomic lattice spacings . this is important because in real 3-dimensional samples many electrons are incident on the magnetic layer from a variety of directions , corresponding to states from all parts of the fermi surface , and therefore different electrons take different paths through the magnetic layer . even if all of the electrons begin with perfectly aligned spins at the normal - metal / ferromagnet interface , electrons reaching a given depth inside the magnet will have traveled different path lengths to get there . the result is classical dephasing . electron spins that have traveled different path lengths will have precessed by different angles around the @xmath47 direction , and therefore their @xmath40 and @xmath70 components will not add constructively . for locations more than a few atomic lattice constants into a magnetic layer , when one sums over electrons from all relevant parts of the fermi surface in calculations that include first - principles computations of the transmission amplitudes @xcite , the transverse ( to @xmath47 ) components of the spins average to zero . as a consequence of this classical dephasing , there is no net transmission of transverse spin angular momentum through the ferromagnet . the transverse angular momentum that enters into the ferromagnet is effectively absorbed within a few atomic layers from the interface . for a full calculation of the spin torque at an interface in a real 3-dimensional sample , it is important to take into account not just propagating wavefunctions , but also evanescent scattering states at the interface . if our toy model # 2 is generalized to three dimensions , evanescent scattering wavefunctions are required in cases where the incident electron approaches the interface from a glancing angle , so that the part of the kinetic energy associated with the perpendicular wavevector is less than the step height @xmath3 . in calculations with more realistic band structures , both evanescent and propagating scattering states can couple to incident bloch states more generally , and it is necessary to take the evanescent states into account to guarantee the continuity of the wavefunction and its first derivative on the atomic scale . although evanescent scattering states do not carry charge current , they do carry spin current , so that they can contribute a significant spin torque even when the net charge flow through the interface is zero . this point can be illustrated by our toy model if we consider a case in which the spin - dependent step heights are sufficiently high that both of the spin components are completely reflected . the transmitted and reflected parts of the scattering wavefunction are then @xmath80 where @xmath81 and @xmath82 are decay constants for the evanescent states in the ferromagnet . because the transmission and reflection amplitudes are now complex , with ( in general ) different complex phases for spin up and spin down electrons , the transmitted and reflected spin current densities will contain @xmath83 as well as @xmath46 components . the transmitted spin current density also decays exponentially to zero as a function of the penetration distance into the ferromagnet . what this means is that , in effect , the electron penetrates into the ferromagnet a distance on the order of @xmath84 and precesses around the exchange field as it does so , so that when it emerges from the magnet it is rotated away from its original orientation . consequently , during the process of reflection an electron can apply a torque to the magnet in both the in - plane and perpendicular directions . in calculations with realistic band structures for normal - metal / ferromagnet interfaces , when one sums over the fermi surface to determine the total value of the transverse part of the reflected spin current there is significant ( but not perfect ) classical dephasing , so that the overall net flow of reflected transverse angular momentum is close to zero @xcite . this means that the incident transverse angular momentum that couples into the evanescent states can not end up flowing away from the interface through the reflected states . instead , this transverse spin angular momentum is deposited in the interfacial region of the ferromagnet via the torque from the evanescent states . this contribution to the torque , which is not directly mediated by the propagating states , can be described as due to spin filtering . if one accounts for the evanescent states when constructing the scattering states but then ignores their contribution to the spin current , the spin - filtering contribution corresponds to the resulting interfacial discontinuity in the part of the spin current density carried by just the propagating states . the net result of the classical dephasing that occurs for both transmitted and reflected electron waves at a normal - metal / ferromagnet interface is that the total transmitted and reflected spin currents , summed over all relevant states on the fermi surface , are approximately collinear with the ferromagnetic layer s magnetization ( in the @xmath47 direction , in our toy model ) . since , to a good approximation , no transverse angular momentum flows away from the magnet , this collinearity means that approximately the _ entire _ incident transverse spin current is absorbed near the normal - metal / ferromagnet interface , and the spin transfer torque ( eq . ( [ eq : pillbox ] ) ) becomes @xmath85 in terms of the parameters used in our first toy model above , it is correct to say that when summing or averaging over all contributions from around the fermi surface that to a good approximation for a typical metallic interface the dephasing leads to @xmath86 , and to a somewhat less - accurate approximation @xmath87 , so that on average for our one electron @xmath88 and the spin torque acting on the magnet per unit area is equal to the full component of incident spin current that is transverse to the ferromagnet s moment . the result in eq . ( [ eq : intabsorb ] ) is a good approximation for metallic interfaces , like cr / fe or cu / co , but the processes that lead to the simple form @xmath89 may be different for magnetic semiconductors or for tunnel junctions like fe / mgo / fe . most electrons that scatter from tunnel barriers reflect , whether they are majority or minority . in addition , tunneling is dominated by electrons that are largely from particular parts of the fermi surface , so the classical dephasing processes that are important for metallic junctions may be weaker in tunnel junctions . in fact , there is good evidence that @xmath90 in tunnel junctions , so that for large applied biases there can be a significant spin torque component in the @xmath70 direction ( perpendicular to the plane defined by the incoming electron spin and the ferromagnet s moment ) @xcite . this is discussed in more detail in the article by sun and ralph . before moving on to consider how the spin torque will affect the ferromagnet s magnetization orientation , we wish to re - emphasize one last important point . spin currents can flow within parts of devices even where there is no net charge current . consequently , a spin transfer torque can also be applied to magnetic elements that do not carry any charge current @xcite . we have already noted two examples of this effect , in slonczewski s original calculation of interlayer exchange coupling in a magnetic tunnel junction @xcite and in our toy model # 2 for the case when both spin - up and spin - down components of the wavefunction are completely reflected . another important example occurs in multiterminal normal - metal / ferromagnet devices , which are designed so that a charge current flows only between two selected terminals , but diffusive spin currents may also flow throughout the rest of the device . the groups of johnson , van wees , and others have demonstrated non - local spin accumulation in nonmagnetic wires using multiterminal devices @xcite . kimura et al . have used a similar lateral device design to demonstrate spin - torque - driven switching of a thin - film magnetic element which carries no charge current @xcite . one can view this effect as due simply to a flow of spin - polarized electrons penetrating by diffusive motion into a magnetic element and transferring their transverse component of spin angular momentum , while an equal number of electrons exit the magnet with an average spin component collinear with the magnet so that they give no spin torque . in this way there can be a non - zero net spin current and therefore a non - zero spin torque on the magnet , even when there is no net charge current . thus far the switching currents required in the devices of kimura _ et al_. are larger than those needed to switch comparable magnetic elements in standard magnetic - multilayer pillar devices , because the magnitude of the spin current densities achieved in the lateral devices ( per unit injected charge current ) is smaller than in the multilayers . _ spin transfer torque and the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation . _ to calculate the effects of the spin transfer torque on magnetic dynamics , in practice a term @xmath91 is generally simply inserted as an additional contribution on the right side of the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation ( eq . ( [ eq : llg ] ) ) . however , this step deserves some careful consideration , as it involves a few subtle points of physics . first , this insertion assumes that the all of the angular momentum transferred from the transverse spin current density acts entirely to reorient the orientation of the ferromagnet rather than , for example , being absorbed in the excitation of short - wavelength magnon modes or being transferred directly to the atomic lattice . this seems to be a reasonable approximation for describing the experiments performed to date ; however , as we note below , the existing spin - torque measurements in metallic multilayer samples are not particularly quantitative . a second simple matter to keep straight is the sign of the torque . an electron s magnetic moment is opposite to its spin angular momentum @xmath92 , where @xmath4 is the total spin and @xmath93 , and likewise in transition metal ferromagnets the magnetization is generally opposite to the spin density @xmath94 , where @xmath5 is here the spin density and @xmath95 is typically in the range -2.1 to -2.2 @xcite . we have defined @xmath96 as a time rate of change of angular momentum . since the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation is stated in terms of magnetization , the contribution of the spin transfer torque should enter this equation with a sign opposite to the change in angular momentum . in the end , the sign of the spin transfer torque is such as to rotate the spin angular momentum density of the ferromagnet toward the direction of the spin of the incoming electrons , or equivalently to rotate the magnetization of the ferromagnet toward the direction of the moment of the incoming electrons . a third , potentially much more consequential , subtlety involves the orbital contribution to the magnetization . if we assume that all of the angular momentum in the ferromagnet is due to its spin density , then conservation of angular momentum implies that the effect of spin transfer torque on the magnetization can be described simply by inserting @xmath97 into the right side of the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation ( eq . ( [ eq : llg ] ) ) . here @xmath98 is the volume of the ferromagnet ( free layer ) over which the spin torque @xmath96 is applied . ignoring any orbital contribution is a reasonable first - order approximation , because the orbital moments in transition metal ferromagnets are largely quenched by the strong hybridization of the d electrons . however , spin - orbit coupling does give rise to a weak orbital moment , typically less than a tenth of the spin moment as indicated by the deviation of @xmath95 from -2 . in a more precise treatment that takes the orbital contribution into account , the total angular momentum density would be @xmath99 , and the magnetization would be @xmath100 , so that there might not be any simple proportionality between the total angular momentum density and @xmath101 . this would necessitate a significantly more complicated picture , as described in more detail immediately below . however , in most analyses of spin transfer torques , the potential effects of orbital moments are ignored , and it is assumed that the spin torque is simply described by eq . ( [ eq : mdot ] ) . the appropriateness of neglecting orbital angular momentum is discussed briefly in the article by haney , duine , nez , and macdonald . _ a more rigorous approach to the equation of motion for magnetization . _ in this section we will discuss how one might take a more systematic approach to deriving the equation of motion for a ferromagnet under the influence of a spin transfer torque . this exercise will give additional insights into what might be required to account more accurately for effects like orbital angular momentum and spin - orbit coupling . this approach also provides a more natural framework for considering spin transfer torques at domain walls and in other spatially non - uniform magnetization distributions . our starting point is that the equation of motion for any variable in quantum mechanics can be determined by taking the commutator of the operator corresponding to that variable with the hamiltonian and then evaluating the expectation value of the result . to explore how this process works , we will consider first the charge density , then the spin density , and finally ( briefly ) the magnetization . in second quantized notation @xcite the charge density and spin density operators are @xmath102 in terms of the creation @xmath103 and destruction @xmath104 operators for an electron at point @xmath105 and spin @xmath106 . these fermion operators obey the anti - commutation relations @xmath107 . for the present purposes we consider the hamiltonian for non - interacting electrons as in the mean field lsda approach @xmath108 \nonumber\\ & & + \int d^3 r \mu_0 { g\mu_{\rm b } \over \hbar } ( { \bf h}_{\rm ext } + { \bf h}_{\rm dip } ) \cdot \hat{{\bf s } } .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the first term in the above equation is the kinetic energy , the second term is the potential , including the local exchange field , and the third term is the coupling with the applied field @xmath109 and the dipolar field @xmath110 due to the rest of the spins . more generally , the potential , the local exchange field , and the dipolar field are many - body terms , but for the present example they are treated as effective single particle interactions . for the moment we are also ignoring spin - orbit coupling in this hamiltonian . let us first derive the equation of motion for the electron charge density . the only term in the hamiltonian that does not commute with the charge density operator is the kinetic energy and it gives rise to a term that is the divergence of the charge current density @xmath111 \nonumber\\ & = & { -e\hbar \over 2im } \sum_\sigma \int d^3 r \bigg\ { \hat\psi^\dagger_{\sigma ' } ( { \bf r } ' ) [ \bm\nabla_{{\bf r}'}\delta(({\bf r}-{\bf r}'))]\delta_{\sigma,\sigma ' } \bm\nabla\hat\psi_\sigma ( { \bf r } ) \nonumber\\ & & - \bm\nabla\hat\psi^\dagger_\sigma ( { \bf r } ) [ \bm\nabla\delta(({\bf r}-{\bf r}'))]\delta_{\sigma,\sigma ' } \hat\psi_{\sigma ' } ( { \bf r } ' ) \bigg\ } \nonumber\\ & = & - \bm\nabla \cdot \hat{\bf j}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the charge current density operator is @xmath112 .\end{aligned}\ ] ] taking the expectation value of eq . ( [ eq : continuity ] ) gives simply the continuity equation for the charge density , as is required by charge conservation . the time rate of change of the charge density in some volume is given by the net flux of electrons into that volume . finding the time evolution of the spin density can be done using the same method , but this exercise is somewhat more complicated because the spin density is a vector and there are additional terms in the hamiltonian beside the kinetic energy with which it does not commute . if we ignore spin - orbit coupling we get @xmath113 where @xmath114 is the tensor spin current density operator @xmath115 , \end{aligned}\ ] ] and the dot product in eq . ( [ eq : qdef ] ) connects to the spatial index of the spin current . similar to the contribution in the continuity equation , there is a contribution to the time rate of change in the spin density due to the net flux of spins in and out of a volume ( the term involving @xmath114 ) . in addition , the spin density precesses in the local fields @xmath116 . there is no contribution from the local exchange field because ( at least in the lsda mean field theory ) it is exactly aligned with the expectation value of the local spin density . the cross product between these two quantities is then identically zero . comparing eq . ( [ eq : qdef ] ) to eqs . ( [ eq : mumagh ] ) and ( [ eq : llg ] ) , the astute reader will notice some differences . ( [ eq : qdef ] ) does not include a contribution from the magnetocrystalline anisotropy , but this is just because for the present we are ignoring the spin - orbit coupling . more importantly , eq . ( [ eq : qdef ] ) appears not to include any term to account for micromagnetic exchange . the explanation for this is that there are actually two contributions to the spin current density @xmath29 and its divergence within a ferromagnet having a spatially non - uniform magnetization . the first is the non - equilibrium spin current that flows with an applied bias and which is the contribution of interest in this series of articles . a second contribution is present in the absence of any applied bias whenever the magnetization is non - collinear . this contribution can be viewed as the mediator of the micromagnetic exchange interaction in analogy to slonczewski s calculation @xcite of the exchange coupling across a tunnel barrier . in general in the discussion of spin transfer torques , and in particular in the rest of this article and the accompanying articles , this contribution is taken into account by including explicitly in the equation of motion a micromagnetic exchange contribution in the form @xmath117 { \bf s } \times \nabla^2 { \bf m}$ ] , so that the spin current contribution then describes only the non - equilibrium component . we expect that the equations of motion become even more interesting if one were to include spin - orbit coupling in the hamiltonian . first , there are additional terms in the equation of motion of the spin density , eq . ( [ eq : qdef ] ) , because the contribution of spin - orbit coupling to the hamiltonian will not commute with the spin density operator . one new term generated by the spin - orbit coupling is straightforward : the magnetocrystalline anisotropy gives a contribution @xmath118 . the damping term in eq . ( [ eq : llg ] ) emerges as well , when a coupling to a source of energy and angular momentum is also included . the article by tserkovnyak , brataas , and bauer describes the derivation of such terms . however , when the orbital angular momentum in a ferromagnet is appreciable , one should recognize that the quantity of primary interest in the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation is the magnetization rather than the spin density , and these quantities need no longer be simply proportional to each other . the magnetization operator is @xmath119 , where @xmath120 is the orbital angular momentum density operator . when taking the commutator of @xmath121 with the hamiltonian , the spin part of the magnetization will generate the same divergence of the spin current written in eq . ( [ eq : qdef ] ) but there will be a large number of additional terms due to spin - orbit coupling and @xmath122 . these complications due to spin - orbit coupling are likely to play an important role in the dynamics of ferromagnetic semiconductors discussed in the article by ohno and dietl , because spin - orbit coupling is much more significant in these materials than in transition metal ferromagnets . as the spin - orbit coupling is comparable to the exchange splitting in the ferromagnetic semiconductors , the band structure does not divide cleanly into majority and minority bands . this leads to additional complications in calculating transport properties @xcite , even beyond the complications discussed above . in these materials , it is not even clear that the spin current is the most appropriate current to consider . this question is related to the issues of interest in the study of the spin hall effect , see @xcite for a review . complications from spin - orbit coupling are also likely to be amplified in ferrimagnetic samples as discussed in the articles by haney , duine , nez , and macdonald and by sun and ralph . _ device geometries . _ for understanding the behavior of spin - torque devices , the simplest geometry to consider consists of two magnetic layers separated by a thin non - magnetic spacer layer . one magnetic layer serves to spin - polarize a current flowing perpendicular to the layer interface ( this spin filtering can occur either in transmission or reflection ) , and then this spin - polarized current can transfer angular momentum to the other magnetic layer to excite magnetic dynamics . the spacer layer can either be a non - magnetic metal or a tunnel junction . in order that magnetic dynamics are excited in one magnetic layer but not both , typically devices are designed to hold the magnetization in one magnetic layer ( the `` fixed '' or `` pinned '' layer ) approximately stationary at least for low currents . this is done either by making this layer much thicker than the other , so that it is more difficult to excite by spin torque , or by fabricating it in contact with an antiferromagnetic layer , which produces an effective field ( `` exchange bias '' ) and increases the damping , which both act to keep the ferromagnetic layer pinned in place . the strength of the spin torque acting on the thin `` free layer '' can be increased by sandwiching it between two different pinned magnetic layers ( with moments oriented antiparallel ) , so that a spin - polarized current is incident onto the free layer from both sides , @xcite . spin transfer devices must be fabricated with relatively small lateral cross sections , less than about 250 nm in diameter for typical materials , in order that the spin torque effect dominates over the oersted field produced by the flowing current @xcite . ( the oersted field is often not negligible even in samples for which the spin torque effect dominates it can be included in micromagnetic simulations of the magnetic dynamics as an additional contribution to @xmath123 in the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation as described in the article by berkov and miltat . ) small device sizes are also convenient for understanding spin - torque - generated magnetic dynamics because the macrospin approximation can become a reasonable approximation , and of course small devices are desired for many applications . two general experimental approaches are used to direct current flow through an area @xmath124 nm wide in a magnetic multilayer . one is to make electrical contact to an extended multilayer substrate in a `` point contact '' geometry , made either mechanically with a very sharp tip @xcite or using lithography techniques @xcite . the other approach is to make `` nanopillar '' devices in which at least the free magnetic layer and sometimes both the free and the fixed magnetic layers are patterned to a desired cross section . see fig . [ fig : geom ] for a schematic illustration of both geometries . nanopillars can be made by electron - beam lithography and ion milling @xcite , stencil techniques @xcite , or electrodeposition of layers inside cylindrical nanopores @xcite . samples in which the free layer is patterned but the fixed layer is left as an extended film are convenient for some experiments because this geometry minimizes the magnetostatic coupling between the magnetic layers . in general , point contact devices require much more current density to excite magnetic dynamics with spin torque , because the excitations must reorient a small region in an extended magnetic film , working against strong micromagnetic exchange . typical critical current densities for excitations in point contact devices are @xmath125 a/@xmath126 to @xmath127 a/@xmath126 , while nanopillar devices have achieved current densities of @xmath128 a/@xmath126 . as far as we are aware , the record low intrinsic ( extrapolated to @xmath129 ) critical current in a nanopillar device with a magnetic free layer that is thermally stable at room temperature is 1.1 @xmath130 10@xmath131 a/@xmath126 @xcite . two of the nice features of nanopillars are that they can be made to have two different stable magnetic configurations at zero applied magnetic field for memory applications , and recently they have enabled direct x ray imaging of current - driven magnetic dynamics @xcite . point contacts have an advantage in that they give narrower linewidths ( @xmath132 ) as a function of frequency @xmath133 when used to make spin - transfer nano - oscillators , as described below . both point contacts @xcite and nanopillars @xcite have also been used to study samples with a single ferromagnetic layer . the article by katine and fullerton describes some of the strategies which can be employed to decrease the critical current density for magnetic switching in nanopillars . the article by silva and rippard discusses research on point contact devices . _ methods for calculating spin torques . _ from a theoretical point of view , a consensus has developed @xcite for the general approach to be used for calculating spin torques in metal multilayers . we note however , that there is not universal agreement that this model is correct @xcite . to solve for the spin transfer torque acting on a static magnetic configuration , the consensus view is that one should determine the spin current density @xmath29 through an analysis of the spin - dependent electron transport in the device structure , and then identify the torque from the divergences of @xmath29 near magnetic interfaces or in regions of non - uniform magnetization . ( as we noted above , this assumes that no angular momentum is lost to the excitation of short - wavelength spin wave modes or to other processes . ) to calculate the spin torque on a moving magnetic configuration , a somewhat more sophisticated procedure is in principle necessary , for a rigorous treatment , in order to take into account the `` spin - pumping '' effect @xcite . spin pumping refers to the fact that a precessing magnetization can produce a non - zero spin current density in a magnetic device , in addition to the spin current density generated directly by any applied bias . the total spin torque on the moving magnetization should be determined from the divergence of the total spin current arising from both sources . however , typically the primary effect of spin pumping is merely to increase the effective damping of the ferromagnet in a way that is independent of bias ( although it may depend strongly on the precession angle @xcite ) , so that spin pumping can be taken into account approximately just by renormalizing the damping constant . then the spin transfer torque even on a moving magnetization configuration can be determined , approximately , from the divergence of just the bias - dependent part of the spin current density . once the spin torque is calculated , the response of the magnetization is generally determined by inserting this torque as an additional contribution to the classical landau - lifshitz gilbert equation of motion ( eq . ( [ eq : llg ] ) ) . the article by haney , duine , nez , and macdonald describes this consensus approach as the `` bookkeeping theory . '' spin pumping can also be incorporated into fully self - consistent solutions without too much extra difficulty , because spin pumping is local in time , depending only on @xmath101 and @xmath134 , and it can be calculated within the same type of theoretical framework needed for calculating the direct bias - generated spin torque @xcite . depending on the amount of disorder in the device and other details , there are a number of strategies for computing the spin current density , some of which are compared in ref . @xcite . if scattering within a layer is weak enough that most electrons do not scatter except at interfaces , the transport is called ballistic . the opposite limit , in which most electrons scatter several times while traversing a layer , is called diffusive . calculations for particular devices can be complicated by the fact that some layers may be in the diffusive limit while others are in the ballistic limit and some layers are in between . the ballistic regime can be treated by constructing the scattering states of the system @xcite , by the keldysh formalism @xcite or by non - equilibrium green s functions @xcite . references @xcite and @xcite have considered some of the potential effects of quantum coherence in the ballistic limit , but these effects are generally not expected to be important in the types of metallic multilayer samples typically studied experimentally , because their interfaces are not sufficiently abrupt and perfect . in principle , scattering - state formalisms , the keldysh method , and non - equilibrium green s functions techniques can all be extended into the diffusive regime , but the strong scattering in the diffusive regime is generally easier to treat using the semiclassical approaches discussed next . the boltzmann equation @xcite neglects coherent effects , but is accurate for both ballistic and diffusive samples , and can interpolate between these limits . in the boltzmann - equation approach , the transport is described in terms of a semiclassical distribution function so that the behavior of electrons on different parts of the fermi surface are tracked separately . other calculation strategies are based on approximations that sum over this distribution function and compute the transport in terms of just its moments . these include the drift - diffusion approximation @xcite and circuit theory @xcite . for the non - collinear magnetic configurations considered here , these approximations are extensions of valet - fert theory @xcite , which is widely used to describe gmr for collinear magnetizations . in all of these approaches , the transport across the interfaces is described in terms of spin - dependent transmission and reflection amplitudes . for electron spins that are collinear with the magnetization , these processes are incorporated into the transport calculations as boundary conditions between the solutions of the transport equations in each layer , and the results are spin - dependent interface resistances @xcite ( or conductances ) . for spins that are not collinear , transmission and reflection give rise both to boundary conditions on the transport calculations and also give the spin transfer torque . in the drift - diffusion approach , the non - collinear boundary conditions are that the transverse spin current is proportional to the transverse spin accumulation @xmath135 where @xmath14 is the interface normal , @xmath136 is a characteristic velocity , @xmath137 is the transverse spin accumulation , and the @xmath138 superscript indicates that the transverse spin density and spin current are evaluated in the non - magnet as they are both zero in the ferromagnet . this boundary condition has a straightforward interpretation . since the interface acts as an absorber of any transverse spin component that scatters from it , there is no out - going spin current to cancel the incoming spin current , so there must be a net accumulation of transverse spins in the non - magnet near the interface . since the incident transverse spin current is equal to the spin transfer torque it is also the case that the transverse spin accumulation is proportional to the spin transfer torque . the relation leads some authors to discuss separate spin current and spin accumulation mechanisms for the spin transfer torque . however , from this discussion , we see that the two are intimately related , and the spin transfer torque can be fully accounted for in terms of the spin current ; there is not an extra separate contribution from spin accumulation . for the case of a symmetric two - magnetic - layer device with a metal spacer , slonczewski @xcite calculated the spin transfer torque using a simplified boltzmann equation grafted with circuit theory . he found that the torque on the free layer magnetization @xmath101 due to the misalignment with fixed layer magnetization @xmath139 can be described by adding to the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation ( eq . ( [ eq : llg ] ) ) a term of the form @xmath140 where @xmath141 is the current , @xmath98 is the free - layer volume on which the spin torque acts , @xmath142 , @xmath121 and @xmath143 are unit vectors in the directions of @xmath101 and @xmath139 ( not operators ) , and @xmath144 . all of the details of the layer structure are buried in the constants @xmath145 , @xmath60 , and @xmath146 . very similar results have also been found by a variety of other theoretical approaches . below , we will sometimes refer loosely to @xmath147 as a `` torque '' , even though strictly speaking its units are _ ( magnetic moment)/(volume _ @xmath148 _ time ) _ rather than _ ( angular momentum)/time_. we note that the direction of @xmath147 indicated by eq . ( [ eq : nst ] ) is exactly what is expected from the simple picture of eq . ( [ eq : intabsorb ] ) , based on the approximately complete absorption of the transverse spin current by the magnetic free layer . when the current has the sign that electrons flow from the fixed layer to the free layer in a multilayer like co / cu / co , the electron spin moment incident on the free layer is in the same direction as @xmath139 and the double cross product in eq . ( [ eq : nst ] ) represents just the transverse component . when the current is reversed , it is the electrons reflected from the fixed layer that apply a torque to the free layer ; their moments are on average oriented antiparallel to @xmath139 on account of the reflection , and therefore the transverse component of spin current incident on the free layer changes sign . subsequent calculations @xcite have generalized eq . ( [ eq : nst ] ) for asymmetric structures . ref . @xcite compares these simple forms to full calculations using the boltzmann equation and shows that they agree for typical layer thicknesses but break down in some limits . that paper also shows where a drift - diffusion approximation fails to reproduce the results of the boltzmann equation calculations . _ spin - transfer - driven magnetic dynamics . _ the qualitative types of magnetic dynamics that can be excited by @xmath147 with the form given by eq . ( [ eq : nst ] ) can be understood using the diagrams shown in fig . [ fig : precess ] and fig . [ fig : traject ] . we first consider the simplest possible geometry , in which the free layer magnetization @xmath101 is assumed to move as one macrospin and the magnetic - field direction and the fixed layer moment @xmath139 both point along @xmath68 . we also assume , initially , that there is no magnetic anisotropy . we will consider the problem in terms of a linear stability analysis , to see , when the free layer moment is initially perturbed slightly from the field direction , whether it returns to rest or whether a current can destabilize it to generate large - angle dynamics . this analysis can be achieved using the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation of motion ( eq . ( [ eq : llg ] ) ) . in the absence of any spin transfer torque or damping , if the free layer moment @xmath101 is instantaneously tilted away from @xmath47 then it will precess in a circle , due to the torque from the applied magnetic field . ( for real thin - film devices , magnetic anisotropies generally cause the precessional motion to trace out an ellipse . ) if there is damping in addition to an applied magnetic field ( but still no applied current ) , the torque due to damping will push @xmath101 back toward the low - energy configuration along @xmath47 . consequently , if @xmath17 is perturbed away from @xmath47 , then at @xmath149 it will precess with gradually decreasing precession angle back toward @xmath47 along a spiral path . this type of magnetic trajectory is depicted in fig . [ fig : traject](b ) . when a current is applied , the direction of the spin transfer torque predicted by eq . ( [ eq : nst ] ) is either parallel to the damping torque or antiparallel to it , depending on the sign of the current ( see fig . [ fig : precess ] ) . ( for the more realistic case of elliptical precession in the presence of magnetic anisotropies , the instantaneous orientations of the spin torque and the damping are not always collinear , but on average over each cycle the spin torque can still be understood as either reinforcing or acting opposite to the damping . ) for the sign of the current that produces a spin - torque contribution @xmath147 in the same direction as the damping , there are no current - induced instabilities in the free - layer orientation . the current increases the value of the effective damping , and @xmath101 simply spirals more rapidly back to the @xmath47 direction after any perturbation . for small currents of the opposite sign , such that @xmath147 is opposite to the damping but weaker in magnitude , the spin torque just decreases the effective damping , and again nothing exciting happens , at least at zero temperature . ( effects of thermal fluctuations are discussed below . ) when @xmath147 is opposite to the damping torque and of greater magnitude , then following any small perturbation @xmath101 will spiral away from the low - energy configuration along @xmath47 to increasing angles the current destabilizes the orientation with @xmath101 parallel to @xmath139 and may excite large - angle dynamics . in effect , a sufficiently large current drives the damping to be negative , which leads to the amplification of any deviations of @xmath101 from equilibrium . past this point of instability , the large - angle dynamics excited by spin transfer can fall in two broad classes within the macrospin approximation , depending on the angular dependencies of the spin transfer torque , the damping torque , and the magnetic anisotropy . one possibility , which may occur if the damping torque increases with precession angle faster than the spin torque , is that the initial increase in precession angle may eventually be limited , so that @xmath101 may achieve a state of dynamical equilibrium , precessing continuously at some fixed average angle in response to the direct current ( see fig . [ fig : traject](c ) ) . in this state , the energy gained from the spin torque during each cycle of precession is balanced by the energy lost to damping . the second possible class of spin - torque - driven magnetic dynamics is that the precession angle may be excited to ever - increasing values until eventually it reaches 180@xmath20 , meaning that @xmath101 is reversed ( see fig . [ fig : traject](d ) ) . in real samples , the magnetic anisotropy can generally not be ignored , as we have done so far in the discussion above . the typical sample formed as part of a thin - film magnetic multilayer will have biaxial magnetic anisotropy , consisting of a strong in - plane anisotropy and a weaker uniaxial anisotropy along one of the in - plane axes . in fig . [ fig : traject](e)-(g ) we consider some of the magnetic trajectories that can be excited by spin transfer for this type of sample , where the easy magnetic axes are assumed to lie along the @xmath150 directions , and @xmath139 and the applied magnetic field are also assumed to point along @xmath151 instead of the @xmath152 direction as in fig . [ fig : traject](a)-(d ) . within the macrospin approximation , the dynamics of @xmath101 excited by the spin transfer torque can still be calculated by integrating the landau - lifshitz - gilbert equation ( eq . ( [ eq : llg ] ) ) with the spin - transfer - torque term eq . ( [ eq : nst ] ) included . different behavior occurs in different regimes . consider first in - plane magnetic fields less than the coercive field needed to produce magnetic - field - induced switching . at low temperature , as the current increases , there is generally first a critical current which leads to states of dynamical equilibrium in which @xmath101 undergoes steady - state precession along an approximately elliptical trajectory ( see fig . [ fig : traject](g ) ) @xcite . for slightly larger currents , the precessing state becomes unstable , and the precession angle for @xmath101 increases until it reaches 180@xmath20 , thereby achieving switching to the state with @xmath17 antiparallel to @xmath153 ( fig . [ fig : traject](h ) ) . for applied magnetic fields larger than the coercive field , usually only steady - state precessional dynamics are observed ( fig . [ fig : traject](g ) ) . additional static and dynamic magnetic states may occur at even larger values of current ( see below ) . if one starts with the free - layer moment @xmath101 oriented antiparallel to the fixed layer , rather than parallel ( _ i.e. _ , with @xmath101 in the @xmath154 direction rather than @xmath155 ) , a reversed sign of current is required to produce a negative effective damping , and this can excite steady - state dynamics or switch @xmath101 back to the parallel orientation . for thin - film samples with the magnetizations of both the fixed and free layers oriented in plane and with their easy axes aligned with the applied magnetic field , it is possible to estimate the threshold current for small - angle excitations in a macrospin picture . the estimation proceeds by integrating over the elliptic orbit for a small precession angle to determine both the energy lost due to damping and the energy gained from the spin torque during each cycle , and determining at what value of current the spin torque overcomes the damping . this leads , for example , to the critical current expression for excitations from an initially parallel magnetic orientation ( @xmath66 ) @xmath156 referred to by the article of katine and fullerton . here @xmath25 is the gilbert damping , @xmath157 is the applied magnetic field and @xmath158 the strength of the within - plane magnetic anisotropy @xcite . the saturation magnetization @xmath11 appears in the last factor because of the large thin - film demagnetization effect which favors an in - plane orientation for @xmath17 ; @xmath159 is typically much larger than @xmath157 or @xmath158 . it is important to note that this threshold describes only the first instability of the free layer to small angle precession . there is a separate threshold for magnetic switching at slightly larger currents , which has a different dependence on magnetic field . approximate analytical expressions been derived to describe the switching threshold and other boundaries between the different dynamical states that can be driven by spin torques @xcite . these phase boundaries are illustrated in fig . [ fig : pd ] for the case of a magnetic field applied in - plane along the easy axis of the magnetic free layer . one common result of all semiclassical calculations of transport and spin transfer torque for metallic multilayers @xcite is that they predict a fairly substantial asymmetry between the differential torque near parallel and antiparallel alignment . that is , @xmath160 in other words , @xmath146 is comparable to @xmath60 in @xmath161 . this asymmetry arises from the different amounts of spin accumulation for alignments close to parallel as compared to those close to antiparallel . the results suggest that the critical currents for switching out of the antiparallel state in metallic multilayers should be significantly less than those for switching out of the parallel state . however , typically the asymmetry found in the measured critical currents is much less than expected @xcite . the degree of asymmetry seems to depend on the sample structure ( _ e.g. _ , on the amount of taper in nanopillar sidewalls ) , so the discrepancy could result in part from deviations from a completely uniform magnetization state , which might affect either the mechanism of reversal or the degree of spin accumulation . on the other hand , measurements of noise instabilities for magnetizations close to perpendicular @xcite suggest an asymmetry consistent with the theoretical expectations . if @xmath139 and @xmath101 are misaligned within the sample plane by an applied magnetic field or an exchange bias , the critical currents will depend on the angle @xmath162 between the equilibrium orientations of @xmath101 and @xmath153 . this can be understood in a simple way by taylor - expanding the instantaneous value of the spin torque in the sample plane : @xmath163 ( \theta - \theta_0)$ ] . for current pulses much larger than the threshold needed to produce excitations , the first term can dominate the fast magnetic dynamics that are produced . however , for currents near the critical current this term will generally just cause the equilibrium angle to shift by a small amount as a function of @xmath141 , because it can be opposed by strong anisotropy forces . near the excitation threshold , it is actually the second term of the taylor expansion which governs the stability of the static state , because it determines whether the spin torque has the sign to increase or decrease the magnitude of deviations from the equilibrium angle . dynamical excitations will occur at zero temperature when @xmath164 has the correct sign and becomes sufficiently large to overcome the intrinsic damping , so as to cause the free - layer moment to spiral away from its equilibrium orientation with increasing precession angle , as discussed above . in a macrospin picture @xmath165 \approx 1/\cos(\theta_0)$ ] @xcite . an additional subtlety that can complicate understanding spin - torque - driven magnetic dynamics is that the magnetization in ferromagnetic devices is never completely spatially uniform , but even in thin - film devices with very small cross section there is some spatial dependence to the magnetization within the layer . this has the consequence that even in devices with electric current flowing strictly perpendicular to the plane the spin current density will have a non - zero spatial component within the plane . these lateral spin currents can produce additional instabilities that lead to the excitation of spatially non - uniform magnetization dynamics within a magnetic layer @xcite , and in fact these excitations have been observed in devices containing only a single magnetic layer @xcite and standard two - magnetic - layer devices @xcite . magnetic excitations that are non - uniform through the thickness of magnetic layers may also be possible @xcite . initial attempts to incorporate lateral spin transport self - consistently with spatially dependent magnetic dynamics in micromagnetic calculations of multilayer devices are under way . _ measurements of magnetic dynamics . _ the main experimental probe of the spin - torque - driven magnetization dynamics is measuring the resistance . the resistance reflects the magnetic configuration through the gmr effect . one signature that a current - driven change in magnetic configuration is due to the spin transfer effect is that it is asymmetric in the direction of the current , for the reasons explained above . in the first identification of a spin transfer effect @xcite , tsoi _ et al_. measured a peak in the differential resistance for one direction of the current and not the other . in switching devices @xcite , for large currents flowing from the fixed layer to the free layer ( electrons flowing from free to fixed ) , the free layer magnetization is driven to be antiparallel to the fixed layer , resulting in the high resistance state , while the opposite current drives the sample to the parallel , low - resistance state . the sign of the torque observed experimentally agrees with the sign predicted by theory . a sample excited into a state of dc - driven magnetic precession naturally emits a substantial microwave - frequency signal at its electrical contacts . the resistance is changing at microwave frequencies and a dc current is applied , so by ohm s law a microwave voltage is generated . this can be detected either in the frequency regime @xcite or directly in time - domain measurements @xcite . this mode of steady - state precession is of interest for applications which might benefit from a nanoscale oscillator or microwave source that can have a narrow linewidth and is tunable in frequency , see fig . [ fig : spectra ] . the phase diagram of the spin - transfer - driven dynamics as a function of current , magnetic field , and the direction of magnetic field contains several distinct types of precessional modes and static magnetic states @xcite . when one crosses from one mode to another by varying current or field , the frequency of precession can jump , the microwave power output can increase or decrease dramatically , the linewidth can change , and the resistance measured by standard low - frequency techniques generally changes by a small amount , too . when a device is biased near the boundary between two different modes , it often exhibits time - dependent switching behavior between them @xcite . the dynamical phase diagram has been mapped in some detail for both in - plane and perpendicular magnetic fields in nanopillar devices @xcite , and it shows surprisingly good agreement even with the simplest macrospin models , with some exceptions at large currents and for devices in which the magnetic configuration begins in a vortex state @xcite . in addition to studies in which the equilibrium orientation of the moments is in the plane , devices have recently been produced in which the magnetic anisotropy of one or more of the magnetic layers is manipulated so that the magnetization points out of plane @xcite . such devices may enable ways to decrease the critical current for switching in memory devices , to increase the switching speed @xcite , or to produce improved nano - oscillators . frequency- and time - domain measurements of the different modes of spin - transfer - driven dynamics provide very fertile ground for comparisons with sophisticated micromagnetic simulations of the dynamics , as reported by berkov and miltat in their article . an alternate measurement approach that has recently been exploited is to apply a high frequency input current to drive resonant magnetic precession and look at the static output voltage generated by mixing , a technique referred to as spin - transfer ferromagnetic resonance ( st - fmr ) @xcite . these measurements , as applied to magnetic tunnel junctions , are discussed in the article by sun and ralph . _ effects of non - zero temperature . _ spin - torque devices have sufficiently small sizes that temperature - induced fluctuations can have important effects on the magnetic dynamics . at room temperature , the reduced effective damping that can be produced by spin transfer torque can enhance the amplitude of thermal fluctuations even for currents well below the @xmath129 critical current . these enhanced thermal magnetic oscillations can be measured accurately in tunnel junctions @xcite . in both tunnel junctions and metallic devices , room temperature thermal fluctuations can also cause magnetic switching to occur at currents that are well below the intrinsic zero - temperature threshold current for spin - transfer - driven instabilities ( eq . ( [ eq : criti ] ) ) . in order to determine the intrinsic critical current for switching , it is necessary to make direct measurements of switching on the typical time scale of ferromagnetic precession near 1 ns , or measure the switching current as a function of temperature and extrapolate to zero temperature , or measure the statistics of switching using current pulses of various lengths and extrapolate to the ns scale . the linewidths of the microwave signals generated by spin - torque - driven magnetic precession appear to be governed largely by thermal fluctuations that produce deviations from perfectly periodic motion @xcite . point contact devices , in which magnetic precession is excited in a local area of an extended magnetic film can produce narrower linewidths than typical nanopillar devices @xcite , perhaps because the micromagnetic exchange coupling to the extended film makes them less susceptible to thermal fluctuations . if the effects of thermal fluctuations can be reduced or eliminated , it is likely that the ultimate limit on the linewidths of spin - torque nano - oscillators will be chaotic dynamics of the magnetization @xcite . in terms of theory , the role of temperature is an area that is still under development . transport calculations and determinations of the torque are typically done assuming zero temperature . this approximation is expected to be reasonable because not much about the transport is expected to change with temperature except for scattering rates . there have been a number of theoretical studies of the temperature dependence based on the macrospin approximation @xcite . however , as the temperature increases , the macrospin approximation becomes worse . it is possible to include thermal effects into full micromagnetic simulations , but the calculations become quite time consuming and it is very difficult to capture meaningful statistics . _ on the perpendicular component of the spin torque vector . _ in discussing the result of eq . ( [ eq : intabsorb ] ) , _ i.e_. that one expects essentially all of the transverse spin angular momentum incident onto a normal - metal / ferromagnet interface to be absorbed in producing the spin torque , we made the point that this was only approximately correct ; it is not exact . the most important caveat is that classical averaging over the fermi surface need not necessarily eliminate all transport of transverse spin density away from the interface , particularly for the reflected part of the scattering wavefunction ( or for very thin magnetic layers in transmission ) . one consequence is that the amplitude of the `` in - plane '' component of the torque can differ somewhat from eq . ( [ eq : intabsorb ] ) . in addition , there is the possibility of an additional contribution due to the spin torque in the form @xmath166 oriented perpendicular to the plane defined by @xmath101 and @xmath153 , rather than within this plane as in eq . ( [ eq : nst ] ) . note that here the symbol @xmath167 refers to the direction perpendicular to the plane of the magnetizations as opposed to the usage in eq . ( [ eq : intabsorb ] ) where it refers to both components of the spin current transverse to the free layer magnetization . in fig . [ fig : precess ] , this new component of torque would point in or out of the page . the out - of - plane torque component is sometimes referred to as an `` effective field '' contribution because its form is similar to the torque that would result from a field aligned with the fixed layer magnetization . it can be viewed as a consequence of a small amount of average precession into the @xmath69 direction for reflected electrons in our toy models from section [ sec : stt ] . calculations incorporating transmission and reflection coefficients computed by _ ab initio _ techniques find that the perpendicular component of the torque is small for the materials generally used in metallic multilayer devices . for electrons of a given energy , the out - of - plane component of spin transfer is predicted to be less than 10 % , and typically 1 % to 3 % of the in - plane component @xcite . the final magnitude of the bias - dependent part of the out - of - plane torque is expected to be smaller still , due to a cancellation that arises when computing the bias dependence . this cancellation is maximal in the case of a symmetric n / f / n / f / n junction , where it can be understood from a simple symmetry argument . consider a junction whose layer structure is perfectly symmetric about a plane at the midpoint of the device , see fig . [ fig : geomperp ] . assume that the magnetic moments of the two ferromagnetic layers are oriented in the plane of the sample layers , with an arbitrary angle @xmath48 between them . when a bias is applied to the junction , the resulting spin current density in each lead ( each of the outer n layers ) will be aligned with the magnetization of the neighboring ferromagnetic layer provided that the electrons that transmit into the lead from the rest of the devices are completely classically dephased . in this case , the spin currents in the outer n layers are oriented in the plane of the two magnetizations , and an out - of - plane spin component of the spin current density can exist only in the middle n layer . if there are no sources or sinks of angular momentum except for the spin torques applied to the magnetic layers ( _ e.g. _ , we assume that there is no angular momentum lost to the excitation of short - wavelength spin wave modes ) , then angular momentum conservation allows the perpendicular component of spin torques on the ferromagnetic layers to be determined solely from the out - of - plane spin current traveling between the magnetic layers . as a consequence , the out - of - plane spin torques on the two magnetic layers must be equal and opposite . ( to be clear , our argument applies only to the perpendicular component of the spin torque and not the in - plane component , because the in - plane spin component of the spin - current density is not zero in the outer n layers , and hence the in - plane spin torques on the ferromagnetic layers are not generally equal and opposite . ) for an applied bias such that electrons flow from left to right , suppose that the perpendicular spin torque on the right magnetic layer has the value @xmath168 . now imagine that the bias is reversed , so that electrons flow from right to left . because of the symmetry of the device , the spin current density in this case can be determined from the first case simply by an appropriate rotation ; the answer is that both the direction of the out - of - plane spin component that flows between the two layers and the direction of its flow are reversed , so that ( multiplying the two negative signs ) the out - of - plane spin current density is actually _ the same _ as in the first case . consequently , the perpendicular spin torque acting on the right magnetic layer due to electrons flowing right to left will again be @xmath168 , the same magnitude and the same sign as for the perpendicular torque on the same ( right ) magnetic layer due electron flow from left to right . it follows that the perpendicular spin torque on a magnetic layer in a perfectly - symmetric junction is an even function of the bias @xmath169 , as long as conservation of angular momentum can be applied to the spin - transfer process and the classical dephasing processes are complete . consequently , there is no contribution that is linear in @xmath169 at zero bias in a symmetric junction , in spite of the fact that _ ab initio _ calculations show that electrons at a given energy incident onto a magnetic interface can give non - zero contributions to the perpendicular torque . in a more microscopic picture , one can see how this result comes about by considering a calculation in which the total perpendicular spin torque is determined by integrating the contributions from all electrons incident onto the symmetric junction from both sides . following the logic of the symmetry argument above , the perpendicular torque due to incoming electrons in the energy range @xmath170 incident from the left should be the same , @xmath171 , as for electrons of the same energy incident from the right , as long as we assume that the effect of the applied bias on the scattering potential is sufficiently weak that the electron transmission and reflection amplitudes do not depend explicitly on @xmath169 . for a symmetric junction , any applied voltage bias will offset the electron chemical potential on the two sides of the device by @xmath172 . therefore , if we consider only elastic scattering processes , the bias - dependent part of the perpendicular torque can be calculated by subtracting the contributions of electrons in the energy range @xmath173 to @xmath174 that are no longer incident on the junction from one side , and adding the contribution of the extra electrons in the range @xmath174 to @xmath175 that are incident from the other side : @xmath176 the contributions from the states in the energy ranges @xmath173 to @xmath174 and @xmath174 to @xmath175 cancel to first order in @xmath177 , so that the lowest - order contribution to the perpendicular spin torque should go only as @xmath178 , symmetric in @xmath169 with no linear term . even at non - zero biases the perpendicular component of the spin torque is probably very small in most metallic multilayers . predictions for non - zero values of the perpendicular torque typically arise only under the assumption of coherent transport between ideal interfaces , but in real devices this coherence is generally not present due to interface disorder @xcite . for tunnel junctions , the bias - dependent part of the out - of - plane spin torque is predicted to be larger than for metallic multilayers @xcite . it remains an open question as to how well our symmetry argument applies to tunnel junctions , because the current may be dominated by a small part of the fermi surface . in such systems , classical dephasing may not be as complete and therefore in principle a small linear - in-@xmath169 out - of - plane torque may remain even for a symmetric junction . in addition , for tunnel junctions at high bias , angular momentum loss from hot electrons to the excitation of short - wavelength spin waves might become significant , which would invalidate our arguments because they are based on angular momentum conservation between the conduction electrons and the approximately uniform magnetization mode . nevertheless , a tight - binding calculation designed to model a symmetric magnetic tunnel junction ( in the absence of any short wavelength spin - wave excitations ) did predict a bias dependence @xmath179 @xcite , consistent with the symmetry argument . for a tunnel junction device with a non - symmetric layer structure none of the symmetry arguments apply , and in this case one should expect that there may be a perpendicular spin torque with a linear dependence on @xmath169 near zero bias . the potential absence of complete classical dephasing in magnetic tunnel junctions , the consequences of spin - wave excitation by hot electrons , and the effects of non - symmetric layer structures are all interesting questions for future theoretical work , as is the effect of disorder on the out - of - plane torque . the experimental literature regarding the perpendicular component of spin torque contains some contradictory results . recent spin - transfer ferromagnetic resonance measurements ( st - fmr ) on metallic nife / cu / nife devices find no sign of a perpendicular torque at the level of 1 % of the in - plane torque @xcite , in agreement with the theoretical expectations . however , zimmler _ et al_. interpreted a measurement on co / cu / co devices @xcite of a non - zero slope _ vs_. current for the critical magnetic field for switching @xmath180 at 4.2 k as demonstrating a perpendicular torque linear in @xmath169 with a magnitude about 20 % of the in - plane torque . we are skeptical of this interpretation , and suspect that the observation might be an artifact of heating . the measured slope of @xmath180 was not actually constant as a function of @xmath141 as would be expected from a perpendicular torque , but rather the slope of @xmath180 was approximately zero except for combinations of current polarity and magnetic orientation for which the spin torque decreases the effective magnetic damping . this asymmetric rounding of the critical field line can be viewed as a signature of thermally induced fluctuations @xcite , in that a decreased effective damping can increase the amplitude of thermal fluctuations and therefore decrease the measured switching field at non - zero temperature . et al_. attempted to correct for this temperature effect in their analysis , but did not consider that the temperature might be varying as a function of current due to heating at 4.2 k. spin - transfer fmr measurements on symmetric magnetic tunnel junctions differ from experiments on magnetic multilayers in that the perpendicular torques found in the tunnel junctions are significant @xcite . in agreement with our symmetry argument and with more detailed calculations @xcite , these experiments find that to good accuracy @xmath179 at low bias for symmetric tunnel junctions , with no contribution to the perpendicular torque that is linear in @xmath169 . an earlier report by tulapurkar _ et al_. @xcite of a perpendicular torque linear in bias near @xmath181 is now believed to be incorrect ; the same group has said more recently that this observation may have been an artifact due to a spatially non - uniform magnetic state @xcite . the article by sun and ralph describes in more detail the similarities and differences between spin torques in metal multilayers and tunnel junctions . _ comparison between theory and experiments . _ while there is a general consensus about the correct approach for calculating spin transfer torques in magnetic multilayers , there is as of yet no fully quantitative comparison between theory and experiment in metallic multilayers . the primary difficulty is that the torques themselves are generally not measured directly , but only the resulting dynamics as inferred from the time dependent resistance . spin - transfer - driven ferromagnetic resonance may eventually enable more direct quantitative measurements , but so far this has not been achieved for the in - plane component of the spin - torque in metal multilayers . as described in the article by berkov and miltat , attempting to infer the dynamics of a magnetic sample from its time dependent resistance is highly non - trivial and may hide the details of the torque . the problem is particularly complicated because it is difficult to determine simply from resistance measurements the degree to which spin - torque induced excitations are spatially non - uniform . the most sophisticated calculations can make very good qualitative predictions concerning , for example , the different types of dynamical modes ( static or precessional ) that are observed experimentally . however , they currently do not match experiment well in more quantitative comparisons , for instance in comparing to the current - dependent amplitude of the microwave signals emitted in the steady - state precession regime ( see the article by berkov and miltat ) . another complication is that there is still some variation experimentally between the behaviors of nominally identical samples . this degree of variability has improved since spin transfer effects were first measured , so that quantities like switching currents and precession frequencies now show good reproducibility . however , other quantities , _ e.g. _ microwave linewidths and the positions of transitions between different precession modes , are much more variable . the variability that still exists highlights the importance of achieving improved control over materials and lithography . in this section we provide a very brief introduction to current - induced domain wall motion . this section is brief compared to the previous section because the articles by beach , tsoi , and erskine , by tserkovnyak , brataas , and bauer , and by ohno and dietl together provide a rather comprehensive introduction , review , and summary of open questions for this topic . experimentally , current - induced domain wall motion is typically studied in lithographically defined , narrow magnetic wires . the wires are frequently curved or the ends are designed to make it possible to controllably introduce a domain wall into the wire using an applied field . in early experiments , the positions of the domain walls were imaged using techniques such as magnetic force microscopy ( mfm ) @xcite or scanning electron microscopy with polarization analysis ( sempa ) @xcite . measuring the positions before and after a current pulses allows estimates of the wall velocities . alternatively , the locations of the wall could be determined in real time using the magneto - optic kerr effect ( moke ) @xcite or electrically using gmr sandwich structures @xcite or through the extra resistance due to anisotropic magnetoresistance ( amr ) in a domain wall @xcite . using these various techniques , experimentalists can determine the wall velocity as a function of current and applied magnetic field and compare with theoretical predictions . the level of the comparison is discussed in detail in the article by beach , tsoi , and erskine . to a first approximation , understanding current - induced domain wall motion is quite simple @xcite . assuming that the electron spins adiabatically follow the magnetization direction , the divergence of the spin current in eq . ( [ eq : qdef ] ) gives a torque ( actually a torque density , but for the rest of the article we refer to it simply as a torque ) on the magnetization of @xmath182 . here , @xmath183 is a vector in the current direction with magnitude @xmath184 , where @xmath185 is the polarization of the current . if the current is uniform , this torque density simply translates the domain wall in the direction of electron flow with a speed @xmath186 . there are several factors that complicate this simple description . these factors are described in the three articles by beach , tsoi , and erskine , by tserkovnyak , brataas , and bauer , and by ohno and dietl . the degree to which the spins adiabatically follow the magnetization has been computed in several models @xcite . the deviations are small except for rather narrow domain walls . when they are non - negligible , there is an additional torque in the @xmath187 direction . this torque is referred to as a non - adiabatic torque because it derives from the inability of the electron spins to adiabatically follow the magnetization direction . much of the debate on the theoretical description of current - induced domain wall motion is associated with how to describe the damping and whether there is an additional torque in the direction of the non - adiabatic torque @xcite that arises from the same processes that lead to damping . this torque , while not related to a true non - adiabatic torque is still sometimes called a non - adiabatic torque . alternatively , sometimes it is called the beta term , because @xmath188 is the dimensionless parameter that is frequently used to characterize its strength . this contribution is extensively discussed by tserkovnyak , brataas , and bauer . one technical aspect , whether the adiabatic spin transfer torque can be derived from an energy functional , is addressed in the article by haney , duine , nez , and macdonald . one of the present authors believes that their argument is incorrect , but disagreement is one of the things that makes an issue an open question . just as the dynamics of the free magnetic layers in nanopillars are complicated by the possibility of spatially non - uniform magnetization patterns , so are the dynamics of domain wall motion complicated by non - trivial wall structures . when the domain patterns distort , the motion is no longer simple . domain walls distort in response to non - adiabatic torques , damping , and the presence of non - uniformities in the sample . the non - uniformities are frequently described as pinning centers . they have been studied extensively in the context of field driven domain wall motion as discussed by both beach , tsoi , and erskine and ohno and dietl . much experimental effort is spent on trying to minimize and understand the effects of these pinning centers . in this article , we have tried to highlight some of the open questions in the study of spin transfer torques and provide background material for the succeeding articles . as katine and fullerton describe , spin transfer torques should start having commercial impact in the very near future , but there are still important scientific issues to work through . it seems likely that tunnel junctions will be an important system for applications of spin transfer torques . sun and ralph discuss what is known about spin transfer torques in magnetic tunnel junctions as well as what we still need to learn . the dynamics that result from spin transfer torques is the topic of the articles by berkov and miltat and by silva and rippard . the former focuses primarily on the nanopillar geometry with a free layer that is patterned to have a finite extent . the latter focuses on the fabricated nanocontact geometry in which the free layer is part of an extended thin film . both show that the agreement between theory and experiment is still incomplete . the developments in current - induced domain wall motion are more recent than those in magnetic multilayers and tunnel junctions , so applications are still more uncertain . as beach , tsoi , and erskine describe , the experiments are rapidly becoming more sophisticated and more meaningful results are appearing . tserkovnyak , brataas , and bauer describe the rapid progress in the theory of spin transfer torques in these systems . it is likely that experimental progress will challenge these theories and more work will be required . most research on spin transfer torques has focused on transition metal ferromagnets , but there are other potentially interesting materials systems . ferromagnetic semiconductors are potentially exciting because they have magnetizations much smaller than transition metal magnets , so that their moments might be manipulated using spin transfer from much smaller currents than transition metal magnets . while the feasibility of a room - temperature dilute ferromagnetic semiconductor remains to be established , there are fascinating scientific questions to be understood about these materials and their interactions with current . ohno and dietl describe the measurements of current - induced domain wall motion in a dilute magnetic semiconductor and a theory that can be used to characterize the electrical and magnetic properties of these systems . haney , duine , nez , and macdonald describe a different way of computing spin transfer torques and apply it to novel systems . in particular , they raise the possibility of large spin transfer torques in antiferromagnets . we thank piet brouwer , bob buhrman , paul haney and christian heiliger for valuable conversations about this manuscript , and many other colleagues ( too many to list ) who have helped to educate us about spin transfer torques . we also thank julie borchers , arne brataas , yongtao cui , zhipan li , jabez mcclelland , jacques miltat , josh parks , vlad pribiag , kiran thadani , hsin - wei tseng , and yaroslav tserkovnyak for reading the manuscript and offering suggestions for improvement , and sufei shi for help with figures . the spin - torque work of dcr is supported by the office of naval research , the nsf ( dmr-0605742 and eec-0646547 ) , and darpa . this version of the tutorial is modified from the originally - published version . ( _ i _ ) we have corrected algebraic errors in eq . ( 13 ) and modified the discussion in the following paragraphs to correct a mistaken claim that the spin current density in the toy model can be discontinuous at the interface . we thank claire baraduc for pointing out the error . ( _ ii _ ) we have corrected an error in the units for the y axes in figures 10a and 10b . m. d. stiles , j. magn . magn . mater . * 200 * , 322 ( 1999 ) ; p. bruno , j. phys . : condens . matter * 11 * , 9403 ( 1999 ) ; d. e. brgler , p. grnberg , s. o. demokritov , and m. t. johnson , in _ handbook of magnetic materials , vol . 13 _ , ed . k. h. j. buschow ( 2001 ) ; m. d. stiles in _ ultrathin magnetic structures iii _ , j. a. c. bland and b. heinrich ( eds . ) ( springer verlag berlin 2005 ) p 99 ; m. d. stiles in , _ nanomagnetism : ultrathin films , multilayers and nanostructures _ , d. l. mills and j. a. c. bland ( eds . ) ( elsevier amsterdam 2006 ) , p. 51 . t. mcguire and r. potter , ieee trans . * 11 * , 1018 ( 1975 ) ; i. a. campbell and a. fert , transport properties of ferromagnets , in _ ferromagnetic materials , vol . 3 _ , e. p. wohlfarth ( ed . ) , north holland , amsterdam , 1982 . , j. a. c. bland and b. heinrich ( eds . ) ( springer verlag berlin 1994 ) ; _ ultrathin magnetic structures ii _ , b. heinrich and j. a. c. bland ( eds . ) ( springer verlag berlin 1994 ) ; _ ultrathin magnetic structures iii _ , j. a. c. bland and b. heinrich ( eds . ) ( springer verlag berlin 2004 ) ; _ ultrathin magnetic structures iv _ , b. heinrich and j. a. c. bland ( eds . ) ( springer verlag berlin 2005 ) . , b. hillebrands and k. ounadjela ( eds , ) ( springer verlag berlin heidelberg 2001 ) ; _ spin dynamics in confirnd magnetic structures ii _ , b. hillebrands and k. ounadjela ( eds , ) ( springer verlag berlin heidelberg 2003 ) ; _ spin dynamics in confirnd magnetic structures iii _ , b. hillebrands and a. thiaville ( eds , ) ( springer verlag berlin heidelberg 2006 ) . in discussions of ferromagnetism , the word `` exchange '' is used to mean several things , all fundamentally related but nevertheless distinct . this can be confusing . exchange can be used to describe the electron interactions that give rise to the formation of a moment . it can be used to describe the interaction between a moment and a spin , as is done in the s - d model . it can also be used to describe the interaction between moments on neighboring sites ( @xmath189 and @xmath190 ) that tends to keep the moments aligned , @xmath191 . when we speak of exchange in the context of micromagnetism , it is this last meaning to which we refer . d. houssameddine , u. ebels , b. delat , b. rodmacq , i. firastrau , f. ponthenier , m. brunet , c. thirion , j .- p . michel , l. prejbeanu - buda , m .- c . cyrille , o. redon , and b. dieny , nature mater . * 6 * , 447 ( 2007 ) . a vortex core is truly only a singularity when the magnetization is required to stay within the plane . in real vortex cores , the magnetization rotates out of the plane and the magnetization pattern is continuous everywhere . y. tserkovnyak , a. brataas , g. e. w. bauer , phys . lett . * 88 * , 117601 ( 2002);y . tserkovnyak , a. brataas , g. e. w. bauer , phys . rev . b * 66 * , 224403 ( 2002 ) ; y. tserkovnyak , a . brataas , g. e. w. bauer , b. i. halperin , rev . phys . * 77 * , 1375 ( 2005 ) . engel , e. i. rashab , and b. i. halperin , in _ handbook of magnetism and advanced magnetic materials , _ h. kronmller and s. s. p. parkin eds . ( john wiley & sons ltd . , chichester , uk , 2007 ) , p. 2858 ( arxiv : cond - mat/0603306 ) . for a thin - film spin transfer device with a circular cross section , a fixed layer structure , and current flowing perpendicularly to the plane , the threshold for spin - torque - driven excitations is given by a particular current density , so that the critical current scales @xmath192 , where @xmath193 is the device radius . reorientations produced by the current - induced oersted field will generally occur at a particular field magnitude @xmath194 , so that the threshold current for field - generated reorientations scales @xmath195 , approximately . therefore a sufficiently small device radius is needed if one desires that the threshold for spin - torque excitations should occur at a lower current than thresholds for magnetic - field - driven reorientations . j. zhang , p. m. levy , s. zhang , v. antropov , phys . lett . * 93 * , 256602 ( 2004 ) ; p. m. levy , j. zhang , phys . rev . b 70 , 132406 ( 2004 ) ; j. zhang , p. m. levy , phys . b * 71 * , 184417 ( 2005 ) ; j. zhang , p. m. levy , phys . rev . b * 71 * , 184426 ( 2005 ) . j. grollier , v. cros , a. hamzic , j. m. george , h. jaffres , a. fert , g. faini , j. ben youssef , and h. legall , appl . 78 * , 3663 ( 2001 ) ; j. grollier , v. cros , h. jaffres , a. hamzic , j. m. george , g. faini , j. ben youssef , h. le gall , and a. fert , phys . b * 67 * , 174402 ( 2003 ) ; a. fert , v. cros , j. m. george , j. grollier , h. jaffres , a. hamzic , a. vaures , g. faini , j. ben youssef , and h. le gall , j. magn . magn . mater . * 272 - 276 * , 1706 ( 2004 ) . k. m. schep , j. b. a. n. van hoof , p. j. kelly , g. e. w. bauer , and j. e. inglesfield , j. magn . magn . mater . * 177 * , 1166 ( 1998 ) ; m.d . stiles , and d.r . penn , phys . b 61 3200 ( 2000 ) ; k. xia , p. j. kelly , g. e. w. bauer , i. turek , j. kudrnovsky , v. drchal , phys . rev . b * 63 * , 064407 ( 2001 ) ; g. e. w. bauer , k. m. schep , k. xia , and p. j. kelly , j. phys . d , * 35 * , 2410 ( 2002 ) . Abstract:
[ "this tutorial article introduces the physics of spin transfer torques in magnetic devices . we provide an elementary discussion of the mechanism of spin transfer torque , and review the theoretical and experimental progress in this field . our intention is to be accessible to beginning graduate students . this is the introductory paper for a cluster of `` current perspectives '' articles on spin transfer torques published in volume * 320 * of the _ journal of magnetism and magnetic materials_. this article is meant to set the stage for the others which follow it in this cluster ; they focus in more depth on particularly interesting aspects of spin - torque physics and highlight unanswered questions that might be productive topics for future research ." ]
23,563
23,563
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: there is a very old question in the philosophy of space and time , concerning how and why bodies move in the particular way that they do in the absence of any external forces . the question originates with aristotle , and indeed , the puzzle is particularly acute when one thinks of it as the ancients might have . given some external influence on a body , it might seem clear why that body moves in one fashion rather than another : the external influence forces it to do so . but when there are no forces present , what does the work of picking one possible state of motion over any other ? consider planetary motion : there are no apparent forces acting on planets , and yet they proceed along fixed trajectories . why these orbits rather than others ? in aristotelian terms , what determines the `` natural motions '' of a body ? the modern answer to the question originates with galileo and descartes , but finds its canonical form in newton s first law of motion , which states that in the absence of external forces , a body will move in a straight line at constant velocity . this `` law of inertia , '' as newton called it , is preserved , _ mutatis mutandis _ , in general relativity , where inertial motion is governed by the _ geodesic principle_. the geodesic principle states that in the absence of external forces , the possible trajectories through four dimensional spacetime of a massive test point particle will be timelike geodesics i.e . , bodies will move along `` locally straightest '' lines , without acceleration . in standard presentations of general relativity , the geodesic principle is stated as a postulate ( cf . * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , much like newton s first law . however , shortly after einstein presented the theory , he and others began to suspect that one could equally well conceive of the geodesic principle as a theorem , at least in the presence of other standard assumptions of relativity theory @xcite . this shift from geodesic - principle - as - postulate to geodesic - principle - as - theorem has led to a widespread and deeply influential view that general relativity has a special explanatory virtue that distinguishes it from other theories of space and time : in the words of harvey brown , general relativity `` ... is the first in the long line of dynamical theories ... that _ explains _ inertial motion '' ( * ? ? ? the view holds that newtonian physics may answer the `` how '' part of aristotle s question , but there is a sense in which only general relativity answers the `` why '' part . although einstein s early attempts to prove the geodesic principle were not unambiguously successful , more recent efforts have shown that there is a precise sense in which the geodesic principle may be understood as a theorem of general relativity @xcite . however , it turns out that relativity is not unique in this regard . geometrized newtonian gravitation ( sometimes , newton - cartan theory ) is a reformulation of newtonian gravitation due to lie @xcite and kurt @xcite that shares many of the qualitative features of general relativity . in geometrized newtonian gravitation one represents space and time as a four dimensional spacetime manifold , the curvature of which depends dynamically on the distribution of matter on the manifold . gravitational influences , meanwhile , are not understood as forces , as in traditional formulations of newtonian gravitation ; rather , they are a manifestation of the curvature of spacetime . and in particular , inertial motion is governed by the geodesic principle : in the absence of external ( non - gravitational ) forces , bodies move along the geodesics of ( curved ) spacetime . recently , i have shown that the geodesic principle can be understood as a theorem of geometrized newtonian gravitation @xcite . mathematically , the newtonian theorem is nearly identical to the geroch - jang theorem . moreover , as i have argued elsewhere , when the background assumptions needed to prove these theorems are examined in the contexts of each theory , one can reasonably conclude that the geodesic principle has essentially the same status in both cases , though in neither theory is the situation as simple as one might have hoped @xcite . one consequence of this recent work is that einstein and others idea that the status of the geodesic principle in general relativity distinguishes the theory from other theories of space and time seems more difficult to hold on to . but it also raises a related issue . when one attends carefully to the details of these theorems , several complications arise concerning the strength and status of the assumptions necessary for proving them . given these complications , one might reasonably ask , do either of these theories _ explain _ inertial motion ? it is this second question that i will take up in the present paper . i will begin with a brief overview of geometrized newtonian gravitation , after which i will review the relevant theorems concerning the geodesic principle in that theory and general relativity . i will focus on the subtle ways in which the theorems differ , and on the complications that arise when one tries to interpret them . once this background material has been laid out , i will turn to the question at hand . the starting point for this discussion will be to observe that on one way of thinking about explanation in scientific theories , the answer to the question is `` no '' : neither of these theories explains inertial motion , at least if the assumptions going into the theorems have the character i describe . i want to resist this view , however , because i think it takes for granted that one can make clear distinctions between `` levels '' or `` tiers '' of fundamentality of the central principles of a theory . careful analysis of the geodesic principle theorems , meanwhile , suggests that there is another way of thinking about how the principles of a theory fit together . the alternative view i will develop i will call it the `` puzzle ball view '' or , perhaps more precisely , the `` puzzle ball conjecture''holds that the foundations of physical theories , or at least _ these _ physical theories , are best conceived as a network of mutually interdependent principles , rather than as a collection of independent and explanatorily fundamental `` axioms '' or `` postulates '' . on this view , one way to provide a satisfactory explanation of a central principle of a theory , such as the geodesic principle in general relativity or geometrized newtonian gravitation , would be to exhibit its dependence on the other central principles of the theory , i.e. , to show how the principle - to - be - explained is a consequence of the other central principles and basic assumptions of the theory . and this is precisely what the theorems i will describe do . and so , i will argue that there _ is _ a sense in which both theories explain inertial motion , though some care is required to say what is meant by `` explain '' in this context . i should be clear from the start : the language of explanation is a convenient one , but i am not ultimately interested in the semantics of the word `` explain '' . the goal is not to argue whether one thing or another is _ really _ an explanation . the dialectic , rather , is as follows . many people have suggested that general relativity provides an important kind of insight with regard to inertial motion , something to be valued and sought after in our physical theories . one might call this thing an `` explanation '' , or not . the point , though , is that when one looks in detail at just what one gets in relativity theory ( and in geometrized newtonian gravitation ) , it seems to work in a different way than one might have initially guessed it would . one response to this observation would be to say that we have not actually gotten what we were promised or , in the language above , that general relativity does _ not _ explain inertial motion . but another response is to try to better understand what we _ do _ get . my principal thesis is that if one takes this second path , an alternative picture emerges of how the foundations of theories work . and on this alternative picture , general relativity and geometrized newtonian gravitation both do provide an important and very useful kind of insight into inertial motion , and more , there are clear reasons why one should value and seek out this sort of insight . indeed , one might even think that what we ultimately get is what we should have wanted in the first place . i am inclined to use the word `` explanation '' for this sort of insight , but fully recognize that this usage may seem non - standard or incorrect to some readers . geometrized newtonian gravitation is best understood as a translation of newtonian gravitation into the language of general relativity , a way of making newtonian physics look as much like general relativity as possible , for the purposes of addressing comparative questions about the two theories . the result is a theory that is strikingly similar in many qualitative respects to general relativity , but which differs in certain crucial details . recall that in general relativity , a _ relativistic spacetime _ is an ordered pair @xmath0 , where @xmath1 is a smooth four dimensional manifold and @xmath2 is a smooth lorentzian metric on the manifold . in geometrized newtonian gravitation , meanwhile , one similarly starts with a smooth four dimensional manifold @xmath1 , but one endows this manifold with a different metric structure . specifically , one defines _ two _ ( degenerate ) metrics . temporal metric _ @xmath3 , has signature @xmath4 . it is used to assign temporal lengths to vectors on @xmath1 : the temporal length of a vector @xmath5 at a point @xmath6 is @xmath7 . vectors with non - zero temporal length are called _ timelike _ ; otherwise , they are called _ spacelike_. the second metric is a _ spatial metric _ @xmath8 , with signature @xmath9 . in general one requires that these two metrics satisfy an orthogonality condition , @xmath10 . it is important that the temporal metric is written with covariant indices and the spatial metric with contravariant indices : since both metrics have degenerate signatures , they are not invertible , and so in general one can not use either to raise or lower indices . in particular , this means that the spatial metric can not be used to assign spatial lengths to vectors directly . instead , one uses the following indirect method . given a spacelike vector @xmath5 , one can show that there always exists a ( non - unique ) covector @xmath11 such that @xmath12 . one then defines the spatial length of @xmath5 to be @xmath13 , which can be shown to be independent of the choice of @xmath11 . given a lorentzian metric @xmath2 on a manifold @xmath1 , there always exists a unique covariant derivative operator @xmath14 that is compatible with @xmath2 in the sense that @xmath15 . this does not hold for the degenerate newtonian metrics . instead , there are an uncountably infinite collection of derivative operators that satisfy the compatibility conditions @xmath16 and @xmath17 . this means that to identify a model of geometrized newtonian gravitation , one needs to specify a derivative operator in addition to the metric fields . thus , we define a _ classical spacetime _ as an ordered quadruple @xmath18 , where @xmath1 , @xmath3 , @xmath8 , and @xmath14 are as described , the metrics satisfy the orthogonality condition , and the metrics and derivative operator satisfy the compatibility conditions . a classical spacetime is the analog of a relativistic spacetime . note that the signature of @xmath3 guarantees that at any point @xmath6 , one can find a covector @xmath19 such that @xmath20 ; in cases where such a field can be defined globally , we call the associated spacetime _ temporally orientable_. in what follows , we will always restrict attention to temporally orientable spacetimes , and will replace @xmath3 with @xmath19 whenever we specify a classical spacetime . in both theories , timelike curves curves whose tangent vector field is always timelike represent the possible trajectories of point particles ( and idealized observers ) . and as in general relativity , matter fields in geometrized newtonian gravitation are represented by a smooth symmetric rank-2 field @xmath21 ( with contravariant indices ) . in general relativity , this field is called the _ energy - momentum tensor _ ; in geometrized newtonian gravitation , it is called the _ mass - momentum tensor_. the reason for the difference concerns the interpretations of the fields . in relativity theory , the four - momentum density of a matter field with energy - momentum tensor @xmath21 is only defined relative to some observer s state of motion : given an observer whose worldline has ( timelike ) tangent field @xmath5 , the four - momentum density @xmath22 as determined by the observer is given by @xmath23 . when @xmath22 is timelike or null , one can define the mass density @xmath24 of the field at a point , relative to the observer , as the length of @xmath22 . moreover , the four - momentum field can be further decomposed ( relative to @xmath5 ) as @xmath25 , where @xmath26 is the relative energy density as determined by the observer , and @xmath27 is the relative three - momentum density . thus , the field @xmath21 encodes the relative mass , relative energy , and relative momentum densities as determined by any observer . in geometrized newtonian gravitation , meanwhile , _ all _ observers make the same determination of the four - momentum density of a matter field at a point : for any observer , @xmath22 is given by @xmath28 . given a particular observer whose worldline has tangent field @xmath5 , though , one can decompose @xmath22 as @xmath29 , where @xmath30 is the ( observer - independent ) mass density associated with the matter field , and where @xmath31 is the relative three - momentum density of the matter field as determined by the observer . thus in geometrized newtonian gravitation , @xmath21 encodes the ( absolute ) mass density of a matter field , as well as its momentum relative to any observer . ) and relative energy density is @xmath32 , where @xmath5 is the tangent field to the observer s worldline . in geometrized newtonian gravitation , this distinction collapses : both ( absolute ) mass density and ( absolute ) energy density are given by @xmath33 . ] it is standard in both theories to limit attention to matter fields that satisfy several additional constraints . in particular , in both cases one assumes that matter fields satisfy the _ conservation condition _ , which states that their energy / mass - momentum fields are divergence free ( i.e. , @xmath34 ) . one also usually requires that such fields satisfy various _ energy conditions_. in geometrized newtonian gravitation , only one such condition is standard : it is the so - called _ mass condition_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * mass condition * : a mass - momentum field satisfies the mass condition if , at any point , either @xmath35 or @xmath36 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ since @xmath37 is the mass density , this assumption states that whenever the mass - momentum tensor is non - vanishing , the associated matter field has positive mass . the situation is more complicated in general relativity , where there are several energy conditions that one may consider . i will mention a few because they are of particular interest for present purposes . one , called the _ weak energy condition _ , is ( at least _ prima facie _ ) quite similar to the mass condition it states that the energy density of a matter field as determined by any observer is always non - negative . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * weak energy condition * : an energy - momentum field satisfies the weak energy condition if , give any timelike vector @xmath5 at a point , @xmath38 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ it is also common to consider stronger conditions . for instance , there are the _ dominant energy condition _ and the _ strengthened dominant energy condition _ : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * dominant energy condition * : an energy - momentum field satisfies the dominant energy condition if , given any timelike vector @xmath39 at a point , @xmath40 and @xmath41 is timelike or null . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * strengthened dominant energy condition * : an energy - momentum field satisfies the strengthened dominant energy condition if , give any timelike covector @xmath39 at any point in @xmath1 , @xmath42 and either @xmath35 or @xmath41 is timelike . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ if these two conditions obtain for some matter field , then not only do all observers take the field to have non - negative energy density , they also take its four - momentum to be causal or timelike ( respectively ) . in other words , these latter conditions capture the requirement that matter must propagate at or below the speed of light . the curvature of a classical spacetime is defined in the standard way : given a derivative operator @xmath14 , the _ riemann curvature tensor _ @xmath43 is the unique tensor field such that for any vector field @xmath5 , @xmath44}\xi^a$ ] . the _ ricci curvature tensor _ , meanwhile , is given by @xmath45 . in both contexts , one says that a spacetime is _ flat _ if @xmath46 ; in geometrized newtonian gravitation , one also says that a ( possibly curved ) spacetime is _ spatially flat _ if @xmath47 or , equivalently , @xmath48 . given these ingredients , one can state the sense in which in geometrized newtonian gravitation , the curvature of spacetime depends on the distribution of matter : namely , the central dynamical principle of the theory , the _ geometrized poisson equation _ , states that @xmath49 , where @xmath24 is the mass - density defined above . this expression explicitly relates the ricci curvature of spacetime to the distribution of matter . it is the newtonian analogue of einstein s equation , @xmath50 , where @xmath51 , or equivalently @xmath52 , where @xmath53 . there are a few points to emphasize here concerning the geometrized poisson equation . for one , if the geometrized poisson equation holds of a classical spacetime for some mass - momentum tensor @xmath21 , then the classical spacetime is spatially flat , since @xmath54 . this fact is a way of recovering a familiar feature of newtonian gravitation , namely that _ space _ is always flat , even though in the geometrized theory _ spacetime _ may be curved . second , in general relativity one can freely think of both the metric and the derivative operator as ( systemically related ) dynamical variables in the theory . in geometrized newtonian gravitation , this is not the case : instead , the metrical structure of a classical spacetime is fixed , and only the derivative operator ( or more specifically , the ricci curvature , which is defined in terms of the derivative operator ) is a dynamic variable . finally , there is a sense in which , given some matter distribution , the geometrized poisson equation `` fixes '' a derivative operator on a classical spacetime , but one has to be careful , as one can typically only recover a unique derivative operator satisfying the geometrized possion equation for a given matter distribution in the presence of additional boundary conditions or other assumptions . the geometrized poisson equation provides the sense in which in geometrized newtonian gravitation , spacetime is curved in the presence of matter ; the sense in which gravitational effects may be understood as a manifestation of this curvature is just the same as in general relativity . that is , a derivative operator allows one to define a class of geometrically privileged curves , the _ geodesics _ of the spacetime , which consist of all curves whose tangent fields @xmath5 satisfy @xmath55 everywhere . i have already said that the timelike curves of a spacetime represent the possible trajectories for massive particles ; the timelike geodesics , meanwhile , represent the possible _ unaccelerated _ trajectories of particles in both theories . the geodesic principle then connects these geometrically privileged curves with force - free motion . thus , in geometrized newtonian gravitation , as in general relativity , the distribution of matter throughout space and time affects the possible trajectories of massive point particles not by causing such particles to accelerate , but rather by dynamically determining a collection of unaccelerated curves . these features of geometrized newtonian gravitation provide the sense in which the theory is qualitatively similar to general relativity . but one might wonder what undergirds the implicit claim that geometrized newtonian gravitation is in some sense _ newtonian_. one sense in which the theory is newtonian is immediate : the degenerate metric structure of a classical spacetime captures the implicit geometry of space and time in ordinary newtonian gravitation , where one has a temporally ordered succession of flat three dimensional manifolds representing space at various times ( cf . but there is more to say . in standard formulations of newtonian gravitation , spacetime is flat . gravitation is a force mediated by a gravitational potential , which in turn is related to the distribution of matter by poisson s equation . in the present four dimensional geometrical language , this can be expressed as follows . we begin with a classical spacetime @xmath56 as before , but now we require that @xmath14 is flat , i.e. , @xmath46 . we again represent matter by its mass - momentum field @xmath21 , defined just as above , but we also define a scalar field @xmath57 , which is the gravitational potential . poisson s equation is written as @xmath58 where the index on @xmath59 is raised using @xmath8 , and where @xmath60 . and now the acceleration of a massive test point particle in the presence of a gravitational potential @xmath57 is given by @xmath61 , where @xmath5 is the tangent to the particle s trajectory . in other words , in standard newtonian gravitation matter accelerates in the presence of mass . it turns out that standard newtonian gravitation ( thus understood ) and geometrized newtonian gravitation are systematically related ( * ? ? ? 4.2 ) . specifically , given a classical spacetime @xmath56 with @xmath14 flat , a smooth mass density @xmath24 , and a smooth gravitational potential @xmath57 satisfying @xmath58 , there always exists a unique derivative operator @xmath62 such that @xmath63 is a classical spacetime , @xmath64 , and such that for any timelike vector field @xmath5 , @xmath61 if and only if @xmath65 . in other words , given a model of standard newtonian gravitation , there is always a model of geometrized newtonian gravitation with precisely the same mass density and allowed trajectories . additionally , the derivative operator @xmath62 will always satisfy two curvature conditions : @xmath66 and @xmath67 . this result is known as the trautman geometrization lemma ; it provides the sense in which one can always translate from standard newtonian gravitation into the geometrized theory . one can also prove a corresponding recovery lemma ( also due to trautman ) , allowing for translations back : namely , given a classical spacetime @xmath63 and smooth mass density @xmath24 satisfying @xmath64 , if @xmath66 and @xmath67 then there always exists a flat derivative operator @xmath14 and a gravitational potential @xmath57 such that @xmath56 is a classical spacetime , @xmath58 , and again for any timelike vector field @xmath5 , @xmath61 if and only if @xmath65 . note that this recovery result only holds in the presence of the two additional curvature conditions stated above ; moreover , in general the translation from geometrized newtonian gravitation to standard newtonian gravitation will _ not _ be unique . ( see figure [ translate ] . ) in general it is possible to translate between geometrized newtonian gravitation and standard newtonian gravitation , as depicted in this figure . on the left is a model of standard newtonian gravitation : one has a matter field represented by the world - tube of some body , such as the sun , and a curve orbiting this body , representing , say , a small planet . this curve corresponds to an allowed trajectory insofar as it is accelerating by the appropriate amount . on the right is the corresponding model of geometrized newtonian gravitation . one has precisely the same matter distribution , and the same allowed trajectory ( i.e. , the same orbit ) , but now we understand this trajectory to be allowed by the theory because it is a geodesic of a curved derivative operator , with curvature determined by the matter distribution . note that both theories have the same metrical structure , represented here by a succession of flat slices representing space at various times . ] with the background of the previous section in place , i can now state the precise sense in which the geodesic principle may be understood as a theorem in general relativity and geometrized newtonian gravitation . i will begin by stating both theorems , and then double back to the question of how one should interpret them . [ gj ] _ _ * @xcite*__let @xmath68 be a relativistic spacetime , and suppose @xmath1 is oriented . let @xmath69 be a smooth imbedded curve . suppose that given any open subset @xmath70 of @xmath1 containing @xmath71 $ ] , there exists a smooth symmetric field @xmath21 with the following properties . 1 . [ sdec ] @xmath21 satisfies the _ strengthened dominant energy condition _ , i.e. , given any timelike covector @xmath39 at any point in @xmath1 , @xmath38 and either @xmath35 or @xmath41 is timelike ; 2 . [ cons]@xmath21 satisfies the _ conservation condition _ , i.e. , @xmath72 ; 3 . [ inside]@xmath73 ; and 4 . [ non - vanishing]there is at least one point in @xmath70 at which @xmath74 . then @xmath75 is a timelike curve that can be reparametrized as a geodesic . one can prove an almost identical theorem in geometrized newtonian gravitation . _ * @xcite * _ [ w ] let @xmath18 be a classical spacetime , and suppose that @xmath1 is oriented . suppose also that @xmath76 . let @xmath69 be a smooth imbedded curve . suppose that given any open subset @xmath70 of @xmath1 containing @xmath71 $ ] , there exists a smooth symmetric field @xmath21 with the following properties . 1 . [ mass ] @xmath21 satisfies the mass condition , i.e. , whenever @xmath74 , @xmath36 ; 2 . [ cons2 ] @xmath21 satisfies the conservation condition , i.e. , @xmath72 ; 3 . [ inside2 ] @xmath73 ; and 4 . [ non - vanishing2 ] there is at least one point in @xmath70 at which @xmath74 . then @xmath75 is a timelike curve that can be reparametrized as a geodesic . as a first remark , it may not be obvious that either of these theorems should be understood to capture the geodesic principle at all , at least in a natural way . a principal difficulty in trying to derive the geodesic principle as a theorem concerns a kind of ontological mismatch between the geodesic principle and the rest of general relativity : namely , general relativity is a field theory , whereas the geodesic principle is a statement concerning point particles . one strategy for dealing with this problem is to try to model massive point particles as `` small '' bits of extended matter , and then try to show that under sufficiently general assumptions , the world tubes of such small bits of matter will contain timelike geodesics . but this turns out to be false in general geodesic motion only obtains in the idealized limit where the worldtube of a body collapses to a curve , in which case one can no longer represent matter as a smooth field on spacetime . the geroch - jang strategy , meanwhile , is different . instead of starting with some matter and asking what kind of trajectory it follows , one starts with a curve and asks under what circumstances that curve can be understood as a trajectory for arbitrarily small bits of extended matter . both theorems then state that the only curves along which arbitrarily small bits of matter can be constructed are timelike geodesics . importantly , one represents a `` small bit of matter '' by a smooth symmetric rank 2 tensor fields with support in some neighborhood of the curve . but a curve is not understood as a possible trajectory for a free massive test point particle if one can construct _ any _ smooth symmetric rank 2 tensor field in arbitrarily small neighborhoods of the curve rather , one limits attention to fields that satisfy additional constraints . the claim , then , is that these theorems capture the geodesic principle in both theories insofar as the additional constraints on the matter fields adequately capture what we intend by `` free massive test matter '' . this means that the interpretation of the theorems turns on the status of these conditions . and so , for a comparative study of the status of the geodesic principle in each theory , one wants to compare the status of each of these assumptions relative to their respective theories . two of the assumptions can be set aside immediately : in both theorems , assumptions ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) play the role of setting up the limiting process implicit in the theorems . assumption ( 3 ) limits attention to matter fields that vanish outside one s chosen neighborhood of the curve ( which captures the sense in which one is considering arbitrarily small bits of matter propagating along the curve ) , and assumption ( 4 ) indicates that the matter field must be non - vanishing somewhere along curve , ruling out the trivial case . these assumptions are identical in both cases , and neither is troublingly strong . there is also an obvious difference that can be safely ignored . in the newtonian theorem , we place an additional constraint on the curvature , namely @xmath76 . this is precisely the curvature condition needed to prove the trautman recovery theorem , allowing one to translate from a model of geometrized newtonian gravitation to a model of standard newtonian gravitation . for this reason , the curvature condition is naturally interpreted as a restriction to models of geometrized newtonian gravitation that are _ newtonian _ , in the sense that they admit translations back to models of standard newtonian gravitation . this presumably is the case of greatest interest , and so i am inclined to think of the assumption as benign . moreover , there is good reason to think that this assumption can be dropped , though to my knowledge , proving as much is still an open ( and perhaps interesting ) problem . the most striking difference between the two theorems concerns the respective assumptions ( 1 ) . in the newtonian theorem , this is the mass condition , i.e. , that whenever the mass - momentum field is non - vanishing , the mass density determined by any observer must be positive . this is the standard energy condition in geometrized newtonian gravitation , and more , it is natural in this context , as it captures the sense in which the bits of matter being represented are massive . in the geroch - jang theorem , meanwhile , one requires the strengthened dominant energy condition , which states that ( a ) all observers must assign non - negative ( mass-)energy density to the matter field ( the weak energy condition ) and ( b ) that if @xmath77 , then the four - momentum assigned to the matter field by any observer must by timelike . it seems natural to think that the _ weak _ energy condition , ( a ) , is playing the role played by the mass condition in the newtonian case : namely , it captures the sense in which the small bits of matter are massive , by requiring that they always have non - negative mass . but from this perspective , the second part of the condition , ( b ) , is a strong additional requirement . in newtonian gravitation , it would seem , one needs only to assume that mass is always positive to get timelike geodesic propagation , whereas in general relativity , one also needs to make an assumption about the timelike propagation of matter . however , the situation is not quite so simple as this . although the mass condition appears to be nothing more than an assumption about positive mass , it , too , contains an implicit assumption about timelike propagation . to see this , consider a different ( non - standard ) newtonian energy condition , which i will call the _ weakened mass condition_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * weakened mass condition * : a mass - momentum field @xmath21 satisfies the weakened mass condition if at any point , @xmath78 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the weakened mass condition has a good claim on being the newtonian analogue of the weak energy condition and might similarly be understood as the claim that mass / energy density is always non - negative . but it is _ strictly weaker _ than the mass condition , since the weakened mass condition may be satisfied by mass - momentum fields that are spacelike , in the sense that @xmath77 but @xmath79 ( for example , consider @xmath80 , with @xmath81 a spacelike vector field ) . in other words , the mass condition amounts to the weakened mass condition plus the additional assumption that @xmath21 is timelike . we can make this explicit by defining an equivalent condition , the _ modified mass condition_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * modified mass condition * : a mass - momentum field @xmath21 satisfies the modified mass condition if at any point , @xmath78 and either @xmath35 or @xmath82 is timelike . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ the modified mass condition is equivalent to the mass condition , but would appear to be the natural translation of the strengthened dominant energy condition . on the other hand , one can also rewrite the weak energy condition as the _ strengthened weak energy condition_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * strengthened weak energy condition * : an energy - momentum field satisfies the strengthened weak energy condition if , give any timelike vector @xmath5 at a point , either @xmath35 or @xmath83 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ stating that for all timelike @xmath5 , if @xmath77 , then @xmath84 . and _ this _ condition seems like the natural translation of the ( standard ) mass condition , but it is strictly weaker than the strengthened dominant energy condition ! this situation is summarized in table [ energyconditions ] . .[energyconditions ] this table summarizes the relationship between the various energy condition discussed in the text . single arrows represent `` apparently natural translations '' ; double arrows represent logical implications . [ cols="^,^,^",options="header " , ] there are thus two ways of thinking about the relationship between the energy conditions used in these theorems , depending on which `` natural translations '' one emphasizes . on one way of thinking , the mass condition is essentially the same as the strengthened weak energy condition . from this point of view , then , the strengthened dominant energy condition in the geroch - jang theorem is a strictly stronger assumption than the corresponding assumption in theorem [ w ] . more , one might be inclined to think that one gets something additional for free in the newtonian case , since the mass condition turns out to imply the ( apparently ) stronger modified mass condition , whereas the strengthened weak energy condition does not imply the strengthened dominant energy condition . meanwhile , on the other way of thinking about things , one argues that the strengthened dominant energy condition is essentially the same as the modified mass condition , which is fully equivalent to the mass condition . and so one concludes that the energy conditions required by the two theorems are essentially the same . there is also another possibility , which is to say that one can not perform simple translations between the energy conditions in these two theories at all . i am inclined to endorse this last option , though this raises new questions about how one should compare the theorems . there are a few things to say . first , irrespective of how one tries ( or does not try ) to translate these conditions , there are still two senses in which the strengthened dominant energy condition is stronger than the mass condition . one is that the timelike propagation clause of the strengthened dominant energy condition can be understood as the assumption that the instantaneous speed of matter , relative to any observer , must be strictly less than the speed of light . the corresponding clause of the ( modified ) mass condition , meanwhile , amounts to the assumption that matter can not propagate at _ infinite _ speed relative to any observer . and the assumption that a number must be less than a fixed finite value is stronger than the assumption that it must be finite , but not bounded . the second , more significant sense in which the strengthened dominant energy condition is stronger is that the _ only _ way in which matter in newtonian gravitation can be `` massive '' ( i.e. , have positive mass as determined by some observer ) is if it satisfies the mass condition . matter that satisfies the weakened mass condition but not the mass condition will necessarily have zero mass . and so one might argue that the mass condition is necessary to capture what is meant by `` massive '' in the context of newtonian gravitation . in general relatively , meanwhile , matter can be `` massive '' in two senses , _ without _ satisfying the strengthened dominant energy condition : it can be massive in the sense that it has positive ( mass-)energy density ( i.e. , it satisfies the weak energy condition ) , and it can be massive in the sense that some observers will assign it positive mass density ( i.e. , the relative four - momentum density as determined by some observers is timelike ) . this second sense trades on an important distinction between _ some _ observers assigning positive mass density and _ all _ observers assigning positive mass density . one might have thought that in order for a matter field to be massive , it would be sufficient if some observers , perhaps privileged say co - moving observers making determinations of `` rest mass density '' , when that makes sense and perhaps not , determine that the field has positive mass density . but the strengthened dominant energy condition requires considerably more than this . in geometrized newtonian gravitation , meanwhile , all of these distinction collapse . if anyone determines a matter field has positive mass , then everyone does . a final remark is that , understood within the context of the respective theories , the strengthened dominant energy condition is a more surprising assumption to have to make than the mass condition . one often thinks of relativity theory as _ forbidding _ superluminal propagation of matter , in the sense that somehow the geometric structure of the theory renders superluminal matter incoherent . but here , at least , it seems that we need to rule out superluminal propagation of matter as an additional assumption in order to derive the geodesic principle . this point can be made precise by asking whether one can drop or weaken the energy condition in the geroch - jang theorem and still derive the geodesic principle . and the answer is `` no '' . if one drops the energy condition altogether , it is possible to construct bits of matter that propagate along _ any _ timelike curve @xcite . and if one weakens the energy condition to the weak energy condition or the dominant energy condition , one can construct bits of matter that propagate along spacelike or null curves , respectively @xcite . to be sure , in the newtonian case the mass condition is similarly necessary ( the considerations offered in @xcite can be adapted to show that the weakened mass condition is not enough to get timelike geodesic motion in geometrized newtonian gravitation ) , but this does not seem as striking , since one does not expect newtonian gravitation to imply restrictions on the propagation of matter , even if it is standard to assume that matter can not propagate instantaneously in the theory . this leaves the conservation condition , assumption ( 2 ) in both theorems . the statement of the assumption is identical in both cases , namely that the tensor fields representing matter must divergence free . and in both theories , this assumption is a way of capturing that the bits of matter must be _ free _ in the sense of non - interacting . this interpretation is justified because in both theories there is a standard background assumption that at every point of spacetime , _ total _ energy / mass - momentum must be divergence free , and more , that a particular energy / mass - momentum field fails to be divergence free at a point just in case it is interacting with some other such field at that point . and so , to say that a particular field satisfies the conservation condition everywhere is to say that that field can not be exchanging energy / mass - momentum with any other fields . so far , it would seem that these assumptions have precisely the same status in both theorems . but this is too quick . although the assumptions are equally natural ways of capturing the desired sense of `` free '' in both theorems , they only have that interpretation in the presence of the background assumption regarding the local conservation of total energy / mass - momentum . and there is an argument to be made that this background assumption has a different status in general relativity than in geometrized newtonian gravitation . in general relativity , einstein s equation implies the conservation condition , at least for total source matter . this is because the equation can be written as @xmath85 , and it is a brute geometrical fact ( known as bianchi s identity ) that the right - hand side of this equation is always divergence free . thus , the left - hand side must also be divergence free . the geometrized poisson equation , however , does _ not _ imply the conservation condition . and so , if one has einstein s equation lurking in the background , one might be inclined to say that the background assumption that matter is conserved comes for free in general relativity , whereas it is an additional brute assumption in geometrized newtonian gravitation . there is an important caveat here the argument that einstein s equation implies the conservation condition only applies for source matter , whereas the geodesic principle is supposed to govern _ test _ matter , i.e. , matter that is not treated as a source in einstein s equation but nonetheless , one might think that the conservation condition has a special status even , to anticipate the discussion in the next section , a privileged explanatory status in general relativity because of its relation to einstein s equation . in the next section , i will turn to the question of whether either of these theorems should count as explanations of inertial motion . but before i do so , it will be helpful to sum up the discussion in the present section . i have now made precise the sense in which one can prove the geodesic principle as a theorem of both general relativity and geometrized newtonian gravitation . but , as i hope has become clear , interpreting and comparing these theorems is quite subtle . it is not quite right to say that the theorems have the same interpretation or significance : on the one hand , there is arguably a sense in which the conservation condition , necessary for both theorems , has a different and perhaps privileged status in general relativity ; and on the other hand , there are several senses in which the energy condition required for geroch - jang theorem is stronger than the condition required for the newtonian theorem , both in absolute terms and relative to the respective theories . despite these differences , however , there is at least one important sense in which the status of the geodesic principle is strikingly similar in both theories . in both cases , one _ can _ prove the geodesic principle as a theorem . but to do so , one needs to make strong assumptions about the nature of matter . the status of these assumption will play a central role in what follows . general relativity and geometrized newtonian gravitation , like any physical theory , involve a number of basic assumptions and central principles . for instance , general relativity begins with some background assumptions about matter and geometry : space and time are represented by a four dimensional , possibly curved lorentzian manifold ; matter is represented by its energy - momentum tensor , a smooth symmetric rank two field on spacetime . one then adds some additional assumptions , as principles indicating how to interpret and use the theory . one may stipulate that total energy - momentum at a point must satisfy the conservation condition . one assumes that matter fields satisfy various possible energy conditions , that idealized clocks measure proper time along their trajectories , and that free massive test point particles traverse timelike geodesics . we postulate a dynamical relationship between the geometrical structure of spacetime and the energy - momentum field . and so on . some of these assumptions involve stipulating kinematical structure ; others involve basic constraints and dynamical relationships ; others still tell us how to extract empirical content from the theory . all of them have some claim to centrality or fundamentality in the theory . but they are not necessarily independent . for instance , as i mention above , the conservation condition may be understood as a consequence of einstein s equation , at least for source matter . and so , at least in some contexts , one might want to think of the conservation condition as somehow subordinate to einstein s equation . one might even be inclined to say that it is einstein s equation that really deserves to be called the `` fundamental principle , '' while the conservation condition has some other , less fundamental status or , in other words , that einstein s equation _ explains _ why matter is locally conserved . we might even say that this is what it _ means _ to say that something like the conservations condition is explained by a theory : it can be derived from more fundamental principles in the theory . from this point of view , one might have thought that when einstein , eddington , and others have claimed that general relativity explains inertial motion , in the sense that one can prove the geodesic principle as a theorem , the claim would have been analogous to what i have just said about the conservation condition : namely , one can take some collection of other principles of the theory and use them to derive the geodesic principle . one might then think that the geodesic principle has the same subordinate status as the conservation condition . it may be central to the theory , but not truly fundamental . the fundamental principles are the ones that go into proving the geodesic principle . on this view , one thinks of the foundations of general relativity as a two - tiered system . on the top tier are the truly fundamental principles ; on the lower tier are the other central principles that can be derived from the top - tier principles . initially , perhaps , one thought that the geodesic principle and conservation condition were top - tier principles ; but the geroch - jang theorem and bianchi s identity show that they are really second - tier principles . thinking this way can lead to problems , however . the main moral of the last section was that although one can prove the geodesic principle as a theorem in both general relativity and geometrized newtonian gravitation , to do so one requires strong assumptions about the nature of matter . and so , if we want to move the geodesic principle to the lower tier , it would seem that we need to understand these assumptions as as top - tier principles . but this raises a question : why should we think of _ these _ principles as the truly fundamental ones ? or more specifically , why should we think of the conservation condition and the respective energy conditions as more fundamental than the geodesic principle itself ? if one were committed to the idea that the geodesic principle is a second - tier principle in one or both of these theories , perhaps one would be willing to include the assumptions needed to prove the geodesic principle among the truly fundamental principles of that theory . but it is hard to see how this is an appealing move on independent grounds . even if one were to argue that dynamical principles such as einstein s equation and the geometrized poisson equation are clearly more fundamental than the geodesic principle , it remains the case that the strong energy condition needed to prove the geroch - jang theorem is entirely independent of einstein s equation . ( and neither assumption follows from the geometrized poisson equation . ) more , there is a sense in which one can draw all of the inferential arrows in the opposite direction , at least in one important case . consider an energy / mass - momentum field of the form @xmath86 , for some smooth scalar field @xmath24 and smooth vector field @xmath5 . an energy / mass - momentum field of this form is the natural way of representing a matter field composed of mutually non - interacting massive point particles ( at least when @xmath24 is non - negative ) . and so , since the geodesic principle governs the behavior of free massive test point particles , we can use it to derive features of this matter field : specifically , the geodesic principle implies that the flow - lines of the field , which represent the trajectories of each speck of dust , must be timelike geodesics . these flow lines are just the integral curves of @xmath5 , and so it follows that @xmath5 must be timelike and geodesic ( i.e. , @xmath55 ) . but if @xmath5 is timelike , then @xmath21 satisfies the strengthened dominant energy condition ( or respectively , the mass condition in geometrized newtonian gravitation ) . and if it is geodesic , then @xmath21 is divergence free . thus the geodesic principle allows us to derive that matter fields consisting of non - interacting massive test point particles satisfy precisely the two conditions we need to assume in order to prove the geodesic principle . so perhaps we should not be so quick to declare the conservation condition and energy conditions top - tier in either theory . at very least , it is not perfectly clear that these assumptions are more fundamental than the geodesic principle . but thinking in this way might lead one to conclude that _ neither _ of the geodesic principle theorems has much explanatory significance , since ( the intuition might go ) explanations always proceed from more fundamental or basic facts to less fundamental facts . here , meanwhile , the arrows of fundamentality are muddled . and this would mean that not only is general relativity not special with regard to its explanation of inertial motion it does not explain inertial motion at all ! i do not find the argument i offer in the previous section compelling . it rests on a basic intuition : to explain something like the geodesic principle , one must begin with some truly fundamental principles and then provide an argument for why the principle - to - be - explained must follow from these more fundamental ones . this intuition takes for granted that we can make sense of a distinction between different tiers of fundamentality among the central principles of a theory like general relativity or geometrized newtonian gravitation . and i think that this is a mistake or at least , that there is a more compelling way of thinking about things . consider what the geodesic principle theorems _ do _ accomplish . in both of these cases , the theorems show how in the presence of other basic assumptions of the respective theories , the geodesic principle follows . or in other words , they show that given that one is committed to the rest of ( say ) general relativity , one must also be committed to the geodesic principle . one can not freely change the geodesic principle without also changing the rest of general relaitivty : one can not `` fiddle '' with the theory by ( merely ) replacing the geodesic principle with the assumption that free massive test point particles traverse some other class of curves uniformly accelerating curves , say , or spacelike curves . the geodesic principle is not modular , in the sense that one can not construct a collection of perfectly good theories that differ only with how they treat inertial motion . more , the theorems clarify precisely how it is that the geodesic principle `` fits in '' among the other central principles of general relativity . it seems to me that these reflections suggest a proposal . instead of thinking of the foundations of a physical theory as consisting of a collection of essentially independent postulates from which the rest of the theory is derived , one might instead think of the foundations of a theory as consisting of a network of mutually interdependent principles a collection of interlocking pieces , as in the spherical puzzle in figure [ puzzleball ] . the idea is that , as with the geodesic principle , one should generally expect that many of the central principles of a physical theory may be proved as theorems , given the rest of the theory . trying to make a distinction between the top - tier principles and the second - tier principles of a theory is not fruitful , then , since most , or even all , of the principles can be understood equally well as either postulate or theorem , and indeed , in different contexts it may well be desirable to think of them in different ways . importantly , theories are not modular , in the sense described above . we can not simply replace any given principle with some other one , at least not without changing the rest of the theory in possibly dramatic ways . and theorems like the geroch - jang theorem and its newtonian counterpart are of interest because they exhibit the details of these interdependencies . they show just how the pieces interlock . one way of thinking about the foundations of physical theories would have it that some of the central principles of a theory have a distinguished status as the `` truly fundamental '' principles . an alternative view , which i describe and advocate here , is that the foundations of a theory are better thought of as a network of mutually interdependent principles , interlocking like the pieces of a spherical puzzle . on this view , one would tend to expect that any of the central principles of a theory should be derivable from the rest of the theory with that principle removed , much like the overall shape of a puzzle ball constrains the shape of any individual piece . ] to be sure , nothing i have said thus far should count as an apodictic argument for the view i have described ( call it the `` puzzle ball view '' ) . nor will i give such an argument indeed , i am not sure what an argument for the claim that there are no truly fundamental principles of general relativity would look like . instead , i merely offer the view as an alternative way to conceptualize the kinds of interrelations between the principles of physical theories on display with theorems like the geroch - jang theorem . perhaps the proposal is best conceived as a conjecture , albeit one with some compelling early evidence , for the following reason : while the senses in which , for instance , the conservation condition and the geodesic principle follow from other standard assumptions of general relativity are now established , the senses in which other principles , such as einstein s equation or various energy conditions , are derivable from or constrained by the rest of the theory are less clear . and so we have the skeleton of a mathematical question : are _ all _ of the central principles of relativity theory and geometrized newtonian gravitation ( or other theories still ) indeed mutually interderivable in the way that i have suggested ? most or many of them ? or are the geodesic principle and conservation condition anomalies ? some important work has already been done on this topic : @xcite has shown a sense in which the geometrized poisson equation is the unique dynamical principle compatible with a collection of natural assumptions in newtonian gravitation ; similarly , @xcite and @xcite have shown that there is a sense in which the ( vacuum form of ) einstein s equation can be derived from ( in effect ) the geodesic principle , among other assumptions , and @xcite has argued that there is a sense in which the einstein tensor is the unique tensor that can appear on the left hand side of einstein s equation , even in the non - vacuum case . meanwhile , @xcite and @xcite have argued that even though the conservation condition in geometrized newtonian gravitation does not follow from the geometrized poisson equation , one can nonetheless derive it from other principles , at least if one considers lagrangian formulations of the theory . one might even understand newton s argument for universal gravitation as a kind of heuristic argument that the inverse square law of gravitation is the unique dynamical principle compatible with certain other central principles of standard newtonian gravitation ( including generalized empirical facts , such as the universality of elliptical orbits ) . results such as these provide tentative evidence for my basic hypothesis , that one should expect many or all of the central principles of these spacetime theories to be mutually interdependent . but i do not think these results are yet conclusive . specifically , what has not been done is to systematically study such results in order to try to characterize , in the way that has now been done for the geodesic principle theorems , ( 1 ) just what the assumptions going into these theorems are , ( 2 ) how natural the assumptions are in the contexts of the relevant theories , and ( 3 ) how these assumptions , in turn , depend on the other central principles of the theories ( if they do ) . and the attractiveness of the proposal presented here turns on the answers to these questions . it is only after a project of this form has been carried out that one can fully evaluate whether the central principles of of these theories are really as tightly intertwined as the puzzle ball view would have it . that said , if a careful study of this sort reveals that only some of the central principles of a theory are interconnected , it may still be fruitful to think about the foundations of theories in the way i propose here , since the discovery that some central principles of a theory ( say , energy conditions in general relativity ) are more peripheral than others need not imply that one can make sense of a unique or privileged collection of the most fundamental or basic principles . much will depend on just what the structure of the situation turns out to be . it is worth emphasizing that mapping out these kinds of relations between the central principles of a physical theory is of some independent interest , since understanding the extent to which the central principles of general relativity in particular are mutually interdependent could play an important role in the construction of future theories ( and in some ways , it already has ) . the reason has to do with this idea of `` fiddling '' with physical theories . there is a long - standing tradition of attempting to modify general relativity with small changes : for instance , in brans - dicke theory , one modifies einstein s equation to include an additional scalar field ; in teves gravitational theories , one additionally considers vector fields . in still other cases , one modifies general relativity by allowing derivative operators with torsion . in each of these examples ( and many others ) , one makes what appears to be a local change in the central principles of general relativity . but these small changes can have dramatic consequences : for instance , in einstein - cartan theory , a modification of general relativity with torsion , the conservation condition does not generally hold . one does not have a geodesic principle , at least in the ordinary sense , since in general the collection of self - parallel curves picked out by the derivative operator do not agree with the collection of extremal curves picked out by the metric , and free massive test point particles need not propagate along either class of curves . thus , apparently small tweaks can lead to a dramatically different theory , conceptually speaking . a clearer picture of just how the central principles of general relativity _ do _ fit together and constrain one another may provide important clarity into just what the ramifications of these `` small '' modifications to the theory are , and more , may help guide us in the search for alternative theories of gravitation , by indicating which principles are more or less tightly connected to which others . indeed , for this reason there is a sense in which the situation i described above , where some principles are very tightly interlocking and others turn out to be more loosely connected ( for instance , some principles play a role as assumptions in some theorems , but can not be proved in complete generality themselves ) is the most interesting , from the practical perspective of mapping out the space of possible future theories . in the next section , i will return to the question of explanation , now from the perspective of the present view . but before i do so , i want to clarify the puzzle ball view slightly , as the language i have used to describe it may call to mind two other well - known ideas . it seems to me that the view i have described is distinct from both . first , note that the present proposal involves a picture of theories on which one emphasizes the ways in which the principles cohere with one another . this way of thinking may be reminiscent of coherentism in epistemology , a variety of anti - foundationalism that holds that to justify a belief is to show how it coheres with one s other beliefs ( cf . * ? ? ? but there is at least one major difference . coherentism takes the coherence of one s beliefs to be a form of justification for those beliefs . nothing about the puzzle ball view should be taken to suggest that the justification for general relativity comes from the apparent fact that one can derive certain central principles from others rather , the justification for the theory is based on its empirical successes . or perhaps more precisely , our justification for general relativity is essentially independent of the relationship between the theory s central principles . to see the point most clearly , one might well expect both general relativity and geometrized newtonian gravitation to be coherent , in the sense of having mutually interdependent central principles . but this does not imply that they are equally well justified indeed , general relativity is better justified than geometrized newtonian gravitation even if the pieces of geometrized newtonian gravitation are more tightly interlocking . another view that the puzzle ball view may be reminiscent of is some variety of quinean holism ( cf . * ? ? ? quine famously used the `` web of belief '' metaphor when arguing for the interdependencies of our scientific beliefs , and against the analytic / synthetic distinction . one might worry that the puzzle ball picture above is just an alternative metaphor used to make a strikingly similar point indeed , the claim that we can not make a fruitful distinction between top - tier and second - tier principles sounds like an argument against an analytic / synthetic distinction , at least in the narrow domain of the foundations of certain physical theories . and perhaps it is right that i have recapitulated quine here , though if it is , i think the point deserves to be made again since it is relevant for the present discussion of the geodesic principle . still , while this chapter is not the occasion for detailed quine exegesis , i will point to two ways in what i have proposed is _ prima facie _ different from quine s holism , at least on the web - of - belief version . the first difference concerns just what the holism is supposed to be doing . quine uses the interdependencies between beliefs as an argument for a radical form of conventionalism : when faced with evidence that conflicts with our beliefs , we have considerable leeway in choosing which parts of the web of beliefs to revise . indeed , the web image is supposed to support a distinction between `` central '' or `` core '' beliefs and `` peripheral '' beliefs such that we can always accommodate challenges to our full collection of beliefs by modifying only the peripheral beliefs and leaving the core beliefs intact . but this is precisely the opposite of what i have argued here , at least with regard to the foundations of spacetime theories . instead , the idea is supposed to be that the foundations of physical theories are _ not _ modular , and that in general one has remarkably little latitude in how one revises a theory in light of new evidence . and this , i take it , is a desirable feature , since it provides a way out of the radical conventionalism i just described . since the various principles of a physical theory constrain one another , we have very few degrees of freedom for enacting minor changes in theories in light of new evidence . the second difference is related ( and relates , too , to coherentism as described above ) . quine s web of belief is supposed to be a ( descriptive ) metaphor for the sum total of one s beliefs . the view i have described here is much narrower in its scope . i do not claim that all of one s beliefs interlock in the way described ; nor do i claim that scientific knowledge as a whole can be characterized by a puzzle ball . the view does not even hold that particular scientific theories have this feature . the suggestion is that the _ central principles _ of some scientific theories are mutually interderivable , that the foundations of some physical theories should be though of in a certain way . i have been deliberately vague about just what is supposed to count as a central principle , in large part because i think that trying to list these principles in advance , even for well understood theories such as general relativity or geometrized newtonian gravitation , would be unproductive . in fact , one might expect that a full account of just what the central principles of a theory are may have to wait until one sees just what assumptions are necessary nodes when trying to map out the network of interconnected principles at the heart of a given physical theory . what i have done so far and what i think can be done at this stage is give examples of central principles of particular theories . and so one can say that among the central principles of general relativity , for instance , are things such as the conservation condition , einstein s equation , the geodesic principle , and various energy conditions . but the point is that a claim about a collection of principles of this specific character is quite different from a claim about human knowledge quite broadly . note that this last point means that there is still a robust sense in which one can think of some parts of a theory as having a special `` fundamental '' status , even on the puzzle ball view . specifically , one might take _ all _ of the central principles of a theory to be fundamental . this leaves quite a bit of a theory as non - fundamental for instance , particular predictions of a theory would not be among the central principles , and so these would not count as fundamental . if the puzzle ball view is to be viewed as anti - foundational , then , it is only with regard to determinations of relative fundamentality _ among _ the central principles of a theory . now that i have described the puzzle ball view in some detail , i can return to the question of principle interest in this paper : namely , is there a sense in which we should understand the geroch - jang theorem and its newtonian counterpart as explanations ? as a first remark , let me reiterate that if we are thinking in terms of the puzzle ball view , it does not make sense to think of theories in terms of `` top - tier '' principles and other , derived principles : in short , there is no way to make the distinction , at least among the central principles of the theory . none of the assumptions of a theory are distinguished as the truly basic or fundamental ones . and if if this is right , then the kind of explanation that we apparently can not get of the geodesic principle in general relativity and in geometrized newtonian gravitation is uninteresting . no , we can not derive the geodesic principle in either theory from more fundamental principles , but that is because it does not make sense of talk of unambiguously `` more fundamental '' principles in the first place . instead , what we can do is show how the geodesic principle in both of these theories fits into the rest of the puzzle ( as it were ) . this , too , may be understood as an answer to the question , `` why do bodies move in the particular way that they do in the absence of an external force ? '' these theorems reveal that in the absence of an external force , in the context of their respective theories , bodies _ must _ move along timelike geodesics . in other words , the other basic assumptions of the theory constrain the motion of ( small ) bodies . why timelike geodesic motion rather than any other ? because in general relativity , we understand matter to be conserved , and to be such that observers always attribute instantaneous subluminal velocities to it at any point . and it turns out that these assumptions , in the presence of the rest of the theory , imply that the only curves along which free massive test point particles can propagate are timelike geodesics . if we are committed to the rest of general relativity , then there is only one candidate principle for inertial motion . so do general relativity and/or geometrized newtonian gravitation explain inertial motion ? given the considerations just mentioned , i think the answer in both cases is `` yes '' , so long as one understands `` explain '' in the right way . at very least , these theorems provide deep insight and understanding into why bodies move in the particular way that they do in the absence of any external force which is precisely what we were after when we asked the question . moreover , the insight provided is that , in the context of the other central principles of the theories , the geodesic principle is _ necessary _ , the only principle governing inertial motion that is compatible with our other principles . it is a demonstration of precisely the ways in which the working parts of general relativity and geometrized newtonian gravitation constrain one another . that said , this kind of explanation differs in some important ways from other explanations that one may be accustomed to thinking about . in particular , if the puzzle ball view is correct , the kind of explanation i have just described need not be asymmetrical . that is , if general relativity might be said to explain inertial motion in the present sense by appealing to the fact that one can derive the geodesic principle from various other assumptions in the theory , one should _ not _ conclude that the geodesic principle can not play a role in other derivations that should also count as explanatory even derivations of the assumptions going into the geroch - jang theorem or its newtonian counterpart . indeed , one should expect that just as the geodesic principle is constrained by the other central assumptions of general relativity , so too are the conservation condition , the strengthened dominant energy condition , and even einstein s equation constrained . and by the same reasons i have offered above for the view that one might justly call the geroch - jang theorem an explanation of inertial motion , one might also say that explanations can be given for the conservation condition or einstein s equation , by showing how these principles of general relativity are derivable from the other central principles of the theory . in other words , general relativity explains inertial motion by appeal to einstein s equation , but it may equally well explains einstein s equation by appeal to the geodesic principle and other central assumptions of general relativity . this observation may give some readers pause . there is , by now , a long tradition of philosophers of science worrying about the so - called `` problem of explanatory asymmetry '' ( cf . * ) : intuitively , explanations appear to run in one direction and only one direction . the trajectory of a comet may explain why we see a bright light in the nighttime sky once every few hundred years , but a bright light in the nighttime sky can not explain the trajectory of a comet ; the height of a flagpole may explain the length of its shadow at sunset , but the length of the shadow does not explain the height of the flagpole . and so , many philosophers have argued , an account of explanation that allows symmetrical explanations situations where a explains b and b explains a is _ prima facie _ unacceptable . a few remarks are in order . first , @xcite has argued , i think correctly , that explanation should be understood as essentially pragmatic and in particular , that explanations should only be understood as responses to certain classes of question . to determine whether or not some particular response to a why question ( say ) should count as a satisfactory explanation depends on the context in which the question was asked and the particular demands of the questioner . while in some contexts we might want to say that a particular explanation runs in only one direction , there may well be other contexts in which the explanation would run in the other direction . if one is thinking in this way then the present example is simply a special case : if the question `` why do bodies move in the particular way that they do in the absence of an external force ? '' is understood as `` does general relativity require us to adopt the geodesic principle as the central principle governing inertial motion ? '' , then one is rightly satisfied by a response along the lines of the geroch - jang theorem , even if in other contexts i.e . , in response to other questions one might appeal to the geodesic principle to explain ( say ) einstein s equation . but there is also a more important point to make , here : i do not claim to be offering an `` account of explanation '' , or anything like it . i have not suggested that a necessary or even sufficient condition for being an explanation is to show how the thing to be explained `` fits in '' with the rest of a physical theory , in the sense that it is derivable from other central principles of a theory . the point , rather , is to try to spell out the sense in which a particular class of theorems that show how the central principles of a spacetime theory fit together might be understood as explanatory to say what , precisely , the theorems are doing , and why one might think of this as a kind of explanation , at least on the puzzle ball view . not all explanations work this way , nor do they need to in order for the story i have told here to be correct . and so , the fact that in _ some _ cases , we would want to say that if @xmath87 explains @xmath88 then @xmath88 can not explain @xmath87 in no way undermines the claim that the present explanations simply do not work that way . this point can be made most starkly by pointing to various other questions one can ask about inertial motion , even in general relativity , whose answers would be quite different from the geroch - jang theorem . consider , for example , a question concerning a particular instance of inertial motion . why , one might ask , does the perihelion of mercury s orbit precess ? one would answer this by appealing to some particular initial state of mercury and features of spherically symmetric solutions to einstein s equation to show that mercury s orbit is the only allowed trajectory for a body with certain properties in a solar system like ours . the geodesic principle may play a role in this argument , insofar as one might idealize mercury as a free massive test point particle , and einstein s equation may play a role , insofar as one would want to consider a spacetime that is a solution to the equation , but the argument would have nothing to do with the geroch - jang theorem . and moreover , one would expect this sort of explanation to be asymmetric : einstein s equation and the geodesic principle , along with some details concerning the state of the solar system and initial conditions for mercury , explain the precession of the perihelion of mercury ; the precession of the perihelion of mercury does not explain einstein s equation or the geodesic principle . but this is just the point . if the geroch - jang theorem and its newtonian counterpart should be countenanced as explanations , it is only because they are satisfactory answers to particular questions , and they are only explanatory in the context of _ those _ demands for explanation . a question concerning the orbit of mercury is quite different from a question concerning the nature of inertial motion generally . and these theorems answer only the most general version of the question : why _ this _ principle as opposed to any other ? this is no mean task , but it is a specific one , and it needs to be treated with care . versions of this work have been presented at cea - saclay ( paris ) , bergisch university wuppertal , university of pittsburgh , university of chicago , university of texas at austin , columbia university , brown university , new york university , university of western ontario ( twice ! ) , university of california berkeley , university of california irvine , yale university , and at the ` new directions ' conference in washington , dc . i am grateful to very helpful comments and discussion from all of these audiences , and particularly to ( in no special order ) john manchak , giovanni valente , craig callender , alexei grinbaum , harvey brown , david wallace , chris smeenk , wayne myrvold , erik curiel , ryan samaroo , john norton , john earman , howard stein , mike tamir , bryan roberts , shelly kagan , sahotra sarkar , josh dever , bob geroch , bill wimsatt , david albert , tim maudlin , sherri roush , josh schechter , and chris hill . special thanks are due to david malament , jeff barrett , kyle stanford , and pen maddy for many helpful discussions and comments on previous versions of this work . thank you , too , to dennis lehmkuhl for organizing the 2010 workshop on which this volume is based , and for editing the volume . damour , t. , 1989 . the problem of motion in newtonian and einsteinian gravity . in : hawking , s. w. , israel , w. ( eds . ) , three hundred years of gravitation . cambridge university press , new york , pp . 128198 . kvanvig , j. , 2007 . coherentist theories of epistemic justification . in : zalta , e. n. ( ed . ) , the stanford encyclopedia of philosophy . stanford university , stanford , ca , available at : http://plato.stanford.edu / entries / justep - coherence/. malament , d. , 2012 . a remark about the `` geodesic principle '' in general relativity . in : frappier , m. , brown , d. h. , disalle , r. ( eds . ) , analysis and interpretation in the exact sciences : essays in honour of william demopoulos . springer , new york , pp . Abstract:
[ "i begin by reviewing some recent work on the status of the geodesic principle in general relativity and the geometrized formulation of newtonian gravitation . i then turn to the question of whether either of these theories might be said to `` explain '' inertial motion . i argue that there is a sense in which _ both _ theories may be understood to explain inertial motion , but that the sense of `` explain '' is rather different from what one might have expected . this sense of explanation is connected with a view of theories i call it the `` puzzleball view''on which the foundations of a physical theory are best understood as a network of mutually interdependent principles and assumptions . general relativity , newtonian gravitation , explanation , inertial motion" ]
17,535
17,535
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the abstract state machine ( asm ) thesis , first proposed in @xcite and elaborated in @xcite , asserts that every algorithm is equivalent , on its natural level of abstraction , to an abstract state machine . beginning in @xcite and continuing in @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite , the thesis has been proved for various classes of algorithms . in each case , the class of algorithms under consideration was defined by postulates describing , in very general terms , the nature of the algorithms . in each case the main theorem was that all algorithms of this class are equivalent , in a strong sense , to appropriate asms . the work in @xcite directly leading to the present paper is briefly overviewed in the following section . the present paper continues this tradition , but with an important difference . previously , the standard syntax of asms , as presented in @xcite , was adequate , with only very minor modifications . our present work , however , requires a significant extension of that syntax . the extension allows an asm program to refer to the order in which the values of external functions are received from the environment , and it allows the program to declare a step complete even if not all external function values have been determined . the main purpose of this paper is to extend the analysis of interactive , small - step algorithms , begun in @xcite , by removing the restriction to `` ordinary '' algorithms . here we provide postulates and definitions describing a general notion of interactive , small - step algorithm . in a companion paper @xcite we also extend the syntax and semantics of abstract state machines ( asms ) so that non - ordinary algorithms become expressible . there we provide syntax and semantics for asms incorporating interaction that need not be ordinary , verification that asms satisfy the postulates , and proof that every algorithm satisfying the postulates is equivalent , in a strong sense , to an asm . the algorithms considered in this paper proceed in discrete steps and do only a bounded amount of work in each step ( `` small - step '' ) but can interact with their environments during a step , by issuing queries and receiving replies . such algorithms were analyzed in @xcite , subject to two additional restrictions , which we expressed by the word `` ordinary . '' first , they never complete a step until they have received replies to all the queries issued during that step . second , the action of the algorithm the queries issued and the next state produced at any step is completely determined by the algorithm , the current state , and the function that maps the current step s queries to the environment s answers . in other words , this answer function is the only information from the environment that the algorithm uses . in particular , the order in which the environment s answers are received has no bearing on the computation . in the present paper , we lift these restrictions . we allow an algorithm to complete a step even while some of its queries remain unanswered . we also allow the algorithm s actions to depend on the order in which answers were received from the environment . see the discussion in section [ post ] and particularly remark [ time - stamp ] for a discussion of why the order of arrival of answers is of special importance and why it can not be subsumed in answer functions . it was shown in @xcite that ordinary algorithms are equivalent to asms of the traditional sort , essentially as described in @xcite . in order to similarly characterize the more general algorithms of the present paper , we shall , in @xcite , extend the syntax and semantics of asms . in particular , we provide a way to refer to the timing of the evaluations of external functions and a way to terminate a step while some queries remain unanswered . see subsection [ hist ] for a discussion of the intuitive picture of interactive algorithms that leads to these particular extensions and indicates why they suffice . at the referees request , we comment briefly on the impact to be expected from this work . numerous issues are involved here , which would be better addressed in a broad discussion of the asm thesis rather than in this introduction , but it seems appropriate to say a few words about future prospects . probably the most immediate impact that we expect from the asm approach is on the foundations of software engineering . clarification of commonly used notions like state , level of abstraction , interaction is long overdue . closer to theoretical computer science , the asm computation model is the most general computation model that we know . it supports for example computing with structures rather than strings ; see @xcite for particular examples leading to interesting theoretical results and questions . finally it may be disappointing that , unlike the church - turing thesis , the asm thesis has not been used for negative results ; will it be ? the attention of theorists is moving gradually toward the analysis of the overall behavior of algorithms and not only their input - output behavior . the previous work most closely related to the present paper is the series of papers @xcite , in which the asm thesis is proved for other classes of algorithms small - step algorithms in @xcite , parallel algorithms in @xcite ( both without external intra - step interaction , but with communication between subprocesses in the parallel case ) , and ordinary interactive small - step algorithms in @xcite . also , andreas glausch and wolfgang reisig @xcite adapted the postulates of @xcite to describe a restricted but important class of `` small - step '' distributed algorithms . in this section , we briefly overview the work in @xcite directly leading to the present paper , and we also briefly discuss other work that is related to our goals and analysis , though it applies rather different methods . many algorithms are naturally understood on a high level of abstraction ; for example states could be relational structures ( databases ) . the step to a simulation operating over string representations of the abstract entities may lower the abstraction level of the algorithm ; see section [ sec : other ] for discussion . such a step may be less trivial than meets the eye : for instance it is not known whether there is a polynomial - time algorithm that , given two adjacency matrices , determines whether they represent the same graph . the abstract state machine ( asm ) model of @xcite intended to capture arbitrary algorithms at their natural levels of abstraction . the asm thesis of @xcite asserts that every algorithm is equivalent , on its natural level of abstraction , to an abstract state machine . subsequent experimentation provided confirmation of the thesis @xcite . paper @xcite was the first of a series of papers offering _ speculative justification _ for the thesis , for particular classes of algorithms . they all follow the same general pattern ; 1 . describe axiomatically a class @xmath0 of algorithms . 2 . define behavioral equivalence of @xmath0 algorithms . 3 . define a class @xmath1 of abstract state machines . prove the following characterization theorem for @xmath0 : @xmath2 , and every @xmath3 is behaviorally equivalent to some @xmath4 . the characterization provides a theoretical programming language for @xmath0 and opens the way for more practical languages for @xmath0 . the justification of the asm thesis thus obtained is speculative in two ways : * the claim that @xmath0 captures the intuitive class of intended algorithms is open to criticism . * definition of behavioral equivalence is open to criticism . but the characterization of @xmath0 by @xmath1 is precise , and in this sense the procedure _ proves _ the asm thesis for the class of algorithms @xmath0 modulo the chosen behavioral equivalence . so @xmath0 should be as broad as possible within the intended class of algorithms , and behavioral equivalence should be as fine as possible , even if coarser notions of equivalence might suffice for many purposes . the finer the behavioral equivalence , the stronger the characterization theorem . in this subsection we briefly overview the realization of this program for isolated small - step algorithms in @xcite and ordinary interactive small - step algorithms in @xcite . the algorithms of @xcite are executed by a single sequential agent and are isolated in the following sense : there is no interaction with the environment during the execution of a step . the environment can intervene in between algorithm s steps . but we concentrate on step - for - step simulation , and so inter - step interaction with the environment can be ignored . this class of algorithms is axiomatized by three simple postulates . the * sequential time postulate * says that an algorithm defines a deterministic transition system , a ( not necessarily finite - state ) automaton . more explicitly , the algorithm determines * a nonempty collection of states , * a nonempty subcollection of initial states , and * a state - transition function . the algorithm is presumed to be deterministic . nondeterministic choices involve interaction with the environment ; see @xcite for discussion . the term state is used in a comprehensive way . for example , in case of a turing machine , a state would include not only the control state but also the head position and the tape contents . the postulate does not mention a notion of final state , see @xcite for discussion . sequential time already suffices to define _ behavioral equivalence _ of algorithms : two algorithms are behaviorally equivalent if they have the same * states , * initial states , and * state - transition functions . this is as fine as possible , though it may be too fine for many purposes . but , as already noted above , the finer the equivalence , the stronger the characterization theorem . the * abstract state postulate * says that * all states are first - order structures of a fixed vocabulary , * the transition function does not change the base set of a state , and * isomorphism of structures preserves everything , which here means states , initial states and the transition function . it reflects the vast experience of mathematics and mathematical logic according to which every static mathematical situation can be adequately represented as a first - order structure . the idea behind the second requirement is that , even when the base set seems to increase with the creation of new objects , those objects can be regarded as having been already present in a `` reserve '' part of the state . what looks like creation is then regarded as taking an element from out of the reserve and into the active part of the state . ( the nondeterministic choice of the element is made by the environment . ) see @xcite and the next section for discussion . the idea behind the third requirement is that all relevant state information is reflected in the vocabulary : if your algorithm can distinguish red integers from green integers , then it is not just about integers . the * bounded exploration postulate * expresses the idea that a sequential algorithm ( in the traditional meaning of the term ) `` computes in steps of bounded complexity '' @xcite . more explicitly , it asserts that the values of a finite set @xmath5 of terms ( also called expressions ) , that depends only on the algorithm and not on the input or state , determine the state change ( more exactly the set of location updates ) for every step ; see @xcite or the next section for precise definitions of locations and updates . thus , there is a uniform upper bound on the total size of locations that an algorithm needs to explore at any state . bounded exploration is the reason why all algorithms considered , here and in the rest of this paper , are called ` small - step ' . the characterization theorem of @xcite establishes the asm thesis for the class @xmath0 of algorithms defined by sequential time , abstract state , and bounded exploration and the class @xmath1 of machines defined by the basic asm language of update rules , parallel rules and conditional rules @xcite . while the intent in @xcite is to capture algorithms executing steps in isolation from the environment , a degree of _ intra - step interaction _ is accommodated in the asm literature since @xcite : ( i ) using the import command to create new elements , and ( ii ) marking certain functions as _ external _ and allowing the environment to provide the values of external functions . one pretends that the interaction is inter - step . this requires the environment to anticipate some actions of the algorithm . also , in @xcite , nesting of external functions was prohibited ; the first study of asms with nested external functions was @xcite . the notion of _ run _ determines whether _ inter - step _ interaction is allowed , see @xcite for precise definitions and discussion . in @xcite it is argued at length why the inter - step form of interaction can not suffice for all modeling needs . as a small example take the computation of @xmath6 where @xmath7 is an external call ( a query ) with argument 7 , whose result @xmath8 is used as the argument for a new query @xmath9 . an attempt to model this as inter - step interaction would force splitting the computation into substeps . but at some level of abstraction we may want to evaluate @xmath6 within a single step . limiting interaction to the inter - step mode would necessarily lower the abstraction level . thus @xcite sets modeling _ intra - step _ interaction as its goal . different forms of interaction , such as message - passing , database queries , remote procedure calls , inputs , outputs , signals , all reduce to a single universal form : a single - reply zero - or - more - arguments not - necessarily - blocking _ query_. all arguments and the reply ( if any ) should be elements of the state if they are to make sense to the algorithm . for a formal definition of queries see @xcite ; a reminder is given in the next section . for a detailed discussion and arguments for the universality of the query - reply approach see @xcite . articles @xcite limit themselves to interactive algorithms which are _ ordinary _ in the sense that they obey the following two restrictions : 1 . the actions of the algorithm depend only on the state and the replies to queries , and not on other aspects , such as relative timing of replies , and 2 . the algorithm can not complete its step unless it has received replies to all queries issued . the first restriction means that an algorithm can be seen as operating on pairs of form @xmath10 where @xmath11 is a state and @xmath12 an _ answer function _ over @xmath11 : a partial function mapping queries over @xmath11 to their replies . the second restriction means that all queries issued are _ blocking _ ; the algorithm can not complete its step without a reply . ( some uses of non - blocking , asynchronous queries can still be modeled , by assuming that some forms of queries always obtain a default answer . but this is an assumption on environment behavior . ) the present paper lifts both restrictions , and thus extends the theory to _ general _ interactive algorithms . several of the postulates of @xcite cover the same ground as the postulates of @xcite , but of course taking answer functions into account . the most important new postulate is the * interaction postulate * , saying that the algorithm , for each state @xmath11 , determines a _ causality relation _ @xmath13 between finite answer functions and queries . the intuition behind @xmath14 is this : if , over state @xmath11 , the environment behaves according to answer function @xmath12 then the algorithm issues @xmath15 . the causality relation is an abstract representation of potential interaction of the algorithm with the environment . but not all answer functions can actually arise in such interaction . context _ for @xmath16 is a minimal ( with respect to graph inclusion ) answer function @xmath12 with the following closure property : if @xmath17 for some subfunction @xmath18 , then @xmath19 . intuitively , this means that @xmath12 gives answers for exactly those queries that the algorithm would ask , given @xmath12 . this incorporates both the idea of blocking all queries that are issued must be answered and the more basic idea that an algorithm can not see replies to queries that it did nt issue . the * updates postulate * asserts that , for every context @xmath12 for @xmath16 , the algorithm either _ fails _ or produces the next state . this refines the transition relation of sequential time of @xcite . the possibility of explicit failure is new here ; the algorithm may obtain replies that are absurd or inconsistent from its point of view , and it can fail in such a case . the next state , if there is one , is defined by an update set , which can also contain trivial updates : `` updating '' a location to the old value . trivial updates do not contribute to the next state , but in composition with other algorithms can contribute to a clash , see @xcite and also the next section for discussion . the inductive character of the context definition is unwound and analyzed in detail in @xcite . the answer functions which can occur as stages in the inductive construction of contexts are called _ well - founded_. this captures the intuition of answer functions which can actually arise as records of interaction of an algorithm and its environment . two causality relations ( over the same state ) are _ equivalent _ if they make the same answer functions well - founded . equivalent causality relations have the same contexts but the converse is not in general true : intermediate intra - step behavior matters . two ordinary interactive algorithms are _ behaviorally equivalent _ if * they have the same states and initial states , * at all states they have equivalent causality relations , and * at all state - context pairs , either they both fail or they produce the same update sets as required by updates . the * bounded work postulate * of @xcite extends bounded exploration of @xcite to queries . as a consequence every well - founded answer function is finite . furthermore , there is a uniform bound on the size of well - founded answer functions . queries can be expressed by external functions @xcite , but there is a complication . in some cases different textual occurrences of the same external function symbol applied to the same arguments can be reasonably assumed to define the same query , and thus to represent the same reply . in some cases , for instance with object - creation operators of oop languages , different occurrences of the same external function symbol with the same arguments are always assumed to represent different queries which always obtain different fresh replies . there are also many intermediate possibilities . most of @xcite is devoted to a discussion of and a general solution to this problem using the device of _ query - templates _ , which we reuse here . in @xcite the syntax and semantics of ordinary interactive asms is defined . the syntax is essentially the same as the asm language of @xcite with the addition of external function symbols , a subset of the asm language of @xcite . what is new is that the restriction of @xcite , forbidding nesting of external function symbols , can now be safely lifted : the query semantics and the analysis of causality provided by @xcite did not exist at the time @xcite was written . thus the semantics of @xcite was constrained to inter - step interaction only . the characterization theorem for the class @xmath0 of algorithms defined in @xcite and the class @xmath1 of machines defined in @xcite is proved in @xcite . efforts to characterize algorithms mathematically began with the work of alonzo church @xcite and alan turing @xcite in the 1930 s . turing gave a careful analysis and a gradual simplification of what can happen during an algorithmic computation performed by a person . the result was the turing machine model of computation and a mathematical characterization , now universally accepted , of the functions ( from finite strings to finite strings ) that are computable in principle , disregarding limitations of time and memory . the simplifications , however , typically lower the level of abstraction in a drastic way ; just compare any algorithm in @xcite or @xcite with a turing machine implementation of that algorithm . the latter involves details the data representation on the tape , indications how the read / write head should find the right place for the next `` real '' work , etc . that are not essential to the algorithm ( but essential for the turing machine ) . thus , although turing s work successfully characterized the ( in principle ) computable functions , it characterized the algorithms that compute them only to the extent that one ignores levels of abstraction . ( `` in principle '' means that there are no bounds on resources , so `` computable '' does not mean that we are able carry out the computation in the real world . ) the asm thesis , in contrast , asserts that algorithms can be described at their natural levels of abstraction by asms . the textbook algorithms can be written as asms without introducing irrelevant details of implementation . a detailed implementation , such as a turing machine or an assembly language program , can also be written as an asm . there are some other differences between the turing machine model and the asm model related to lowering of the abstraction level in the turing machine model . in the turing model , inputs and outputs are strings . asms deal naturally with computations involving abstract entities . examples include the gauss elimination algorithm over arbitrary fields and the ruler - and - compass constructions of geometry . particularly important examples include computations with finite structures , e.g. relational databases . databases can be implemented as strings . to do that , arbitrary choices may be necessary ( to order the underlying sets ) . thus string encoding exposes the implementation while database queries are supposed to be implementation independent . furthermore , even when an algorithm works with strings , its parallel or interactive character can be lost in a turing machine simulation . slightly before turing s paper @xcite , church @xcite proposed another mathematical characterization of computability , in terms of definability in lambda - calculus . church s proposal turned out to be equivalent to turing s ; that is , the lambda - definable functions are just those that are computable by turing machines . unlike turing s proposal , however , church s was not accompanied by an attempt to analyze the general notion of algorithm ; it therefore lies considerably farther from our work . andrei n. kolmogorov @xcite has given another mathematical description of computation , presumably motivated by the physics of computation rather than by an analysis of the actions of a human computer . for a detailed presentation of kolmogorov s approach , see @xcite . also see @xcite and the references there for information about research on pointer machines . like turing s model , these computation models also lower the abstraction level of algorithms . yiannis moschovakis @xcite proposed that the informal notion of algorithm be identified with the formal notion of _ recursor_. a recursor is a monotone operator over partial functions whose least fixed point includes ( as one component ) the function that the algorithm computes . the approach does not seem to scale to algorithms interacting with an unknown environment . see ( * ? ? ? * section 4.3 ) for a critique of moschovakis s computation model . an approach to interactive computing was pioneered by peter wegner and developed in particular in @xcite . the approach is based on special interactive variants of turing machines called _ persistent turing machines _ , in short ptms . interactive asms can step - for - step simulate ptms . goldin and wegner assert that `` any sequential interactive computation can be performed by a persistent turing machine '' @xcite . but this is not so if one intends to preserve the abstraction level of the given interactive algorithm . in particular , ptms can not step - for step simulate interactive asms @xcite . the topic of the present paper is intra - step interaction between a single sequential - time algorithm and its environment ( that is , the rest of the world ) . we are not aware of any previous literature on intra - step interaction . on the other hand , the communication mechanism that emerges from our study is not limited to intra - step interaction . our investigation did not happen in a vacuum . it is hard for us to indicate particular sources that influenced our thinking , but surely consciously or unconsciously our thinking was influenced by the theory of distributed algorithms , by programming languages attempting to provide means for communication between computing agents , and by computing technology . a few references that seem relevant to us are @xcite . this section is devoted to the description of interactive , small - step algorithms by means of suitable definitions and postulates . some parts of this material are essentially the same as in @xcite , which dealt with small - step algorithms that interact with the environment only between steps ; some other parts are as in @xcite , which dealt with small - step algorithms that interact with the environment within steps but only in the `` ordinary '' manner described in the introduction . we shall present these parts again here , without repeating the explanations and motivations from @xcite and @xcite , but see section [ sec : overview ] . for the genuinely new material , dealing with the non - ordinary aspects of our algorithms interaction with the environment , we shall present not only the definitions and postulates but also the reasons and intuitions that lie behind them . in the following presentation of the postulates and their intuitive motivation , we use the word `` algorithm '' ( or `` interactive , small - step algorithm '' ) in an informal sense . our discussion amounts to an analysis of this intuitive notion , and our postulates are a distillation of the results of the analysis . afterward , in definition [ alg - def ] , we give the phrase `` interactive small - step algorithm '' a formal meaning , based on the postulates . thus , definition [ alg - def ] implicitly asserts a thesis , namely that the postulates and the formal notion defined from them adequately capture the intuitive notion that we analyzed . in @xcite , we shall show that algorithms in our formal sense are behaviorally equivalent to asms . in the light of this result , the thesis implicit in definition [ alg - def ] is really the asm thesis for interactive small - step algorithms . throughout the definitions and postulates that follow , we consider a fixed algorithm @xmath20 . we may occasionally refer to it explicitly , for example to say that something depends only on @xmath20 , but usually we leave it implicit . our first postulate is a cosmetic improvement of the state postulate of @xcite , and most of it is assembled from parts of postulates in @xcite . we refer the reader to @xcite for a careful discussion of the first three parts of the postulate and to @xcite for the last part . states postulate : the algorithm determines a finite vocabulary @xmath21 , a nonempty set s of _ states _ which are all @xmath21-structures , a nonempty subset @xmath22 of _ initial states _ , a finite set @xmath23 of _ labels _ ( to be used in forming queries ) . as in the cited earlier papers , we use the following conventions concerning vocabularies and structures . [ vocab ] a vocabulary @xmath21 consists of function symbols with specified arities . some of the symbols in @xmath21 may be marked as _ static _ , and some may be marked as _ relational_. symbols not marked as static are called _ dynamic_. among the symbols in @xmath21 are the logic names : nullary symbols @xmath24 , @xmath25 , and @xmath26 ; unary @xmath27 ; binary equality ; and the usual propositional connectives . all of these are static and all but @xmath26 are relational . an @xmath21-structure consists of a nonempty base set and interpretations of all the function symbols as functions on that base set . in any @xmath21-structure , the interpretations of @xmath24 , @xmath25 , and @xmath26 are distinct . in any @xmath21-structure , the interpretations of relational symbols are functions whose values lie in @xmath28 . in any @xmath21-structure @xmath11 , the interpretation of @xmath27 maps @xmath29 and @xmath30 to @xmath29 and everything else to @xmath30 . in any @xmath21-structure @xmath11 , the interpretation of equality maps pairs of equal elements to @xmath29 and all other pairs to @xmath30 . in any @xmath21-structure @xmath11 , the propositional connectives are interpreted in the usual way when their arguments are in @xmath28 , and they take the value @xmath30 whenever any argument is not in @xmath28 . we may use the same notation @xmath11 for a structure and its base set . we may omit subscripts @xmath11 , for example from @xmath24 and @xmath25 when there is no danger of confusion . a _ potential query _ in state @xmath11 is a finite tuple of elements of @xmath31 . a _ potential reply _ in @xmath11 is an element of @xmath11 . here @xmath31 means the disjoint union of @xmath11 and @xmath23 . so if they are not disjoint , then they are to be replaced by disjoint isomorphic copies . we shall usually not mention these isomorphisms ; that is , we write as though @xmath11 and @xmath23 were disjoint . interaction of an algorithm with its environment has been analyzed at length in @xcite . the analysis established that all forms of interaction reduce to queries and replies . the algorithms of @xcite are insensitive to the relative timing of replies within a step , and the environment interaction during a step could be expressed there as an answer function mapping queries to their replies . the following simple example shows that the expressive power of answer functions is not sufficient in general . [ ex : broker ] for a simple example , consider a broker who has a block of shares to sell . he asks two clients whether they want to buy the shares . both of them reply that they want to buy the whole block . the broker will sell the shares to the client whose message reaches him first . [ ans - fn ] an _ answer function _ for a state @xmath11 is a partial map from potential queries to potential replies . a _ history _ for @xmath11 is a pair @xmath32 consisting of an answer function @xmath33 together with a linear pre - order @xmath34 of its domain . by the _ domain _ of a history @xmath35 , we mean the domain @xmath36 of its answer function component , which is also the field of its pre - order component . recall that a _ pre - order _ of a set @xmath37 is a reflexive , transitive , binary relation on @xmath37 , and that it is said to be _ linear _ if , for all @xmath38 , @xmath39 or @xmath40 . the equivalence relation defined by a pre - order is given by @xmath41 the equivalence classes are partially ordered by @xmath42\leq[y]\iff x\leq y,\ ] ] and this partial order is linear if and only if the pre - order was . the _ length _ of a linear pre - order is defined to be the order type of the induced linear ordering of equivalence classes . ( we shall use this notion of length only in the case where the number of equivalence classes is finite , in which case this number serves as the length . ) we also write @xmath43 to mean @xmath39 and @xmath44 . ( because a pre - order need not be antisymmetric , @xmath43 is in general a stronger statement than the conjunction of @xmath39 and @xmath45 . ) when , as in the definition above , a pre - order is written as @xmath34 , we write the corresponding equivalence relation and strict order as @xmath46 and @xmath47 . the same applies to other subscripts and superscripts . we use histories to express the information received by the algorithm from its environment during a step . the notion of answer function comes from @xcite , where these functions , telling which queries have received which replies , represented the whole influence of the environment on the algorithm s work . when algorithms are not required to be ordinary , then additional information from the environment , namely the relative order in which replies were received , becomes relevant to the computation . this information is represented by the pre - order part of a history . if @xmath48 and @xmath49 , this means that the answer @xmath50 to @xmath51 was received strictly before the answer @xmath52 to @xmath15 . if @xmath53 , this means that the two answers were received simultaneously the rest of this subsection is devoted to explaining in more detail the intuition behind this formalization of the intuitive notion of the history of an algorithm s interaction with its environment during a step . we do not , however , repeat here sections 2 and 4 of @xcite . the first of these two sections explains in detail our reasons for using queries and replies as our model of the interaction between an algorithm and its environment . the second explains the reasons for our specific definitions of ( potential ) queries and replies . here , we presuppose these explanations and adopt the query - reply paradigm of @xcite ; see also section [ sec : overview ] . our task now is to explain what is added to the picture from @xcite when we remove the restriction to ordinary algorithms . much of the information provided by an environment can and should be viewed as being part of its replies to queries . this includes not only the information explicitly requested by the query but also such varied information as `` how hard did the user ( who is part of the environment ) bang on the keyboard when typing this input '' or `` at what time was this input provided '' if such information is relevant to the algorithm s execution . thus , we can view such information as being included in the answer function @xmath54 , without referring to the second component of a history , the pre - order . the purpose of the pre - order , on the other hand , is to represent the order in which the algorithm becomes aware of the environment s answers . even if the environment provides a time - stamp as part of each reply , this order can not be read off from the replies . the algorithm may become aware of the replies in an order different from that indicated by the time stamps . in the broker example [ ex : broker ] , the broker will sell the shares to the client whose message reaches him first , even if the message from the other client is sent earlier . [ time - stamp ] could the environment provide , as part of its replies , time stamps that tell when the algorithm becomes aware of the replies ? if so , could we then proceed as in @xcite , where algorithms get information from the environment only via the answer function ? in other words , could we dispense with the pre - order component in histories ? the idea of a time stamp telling not when the reply was sent but when it is received is not as absurd as it might appear . the factors affecting the time of receipt , such as the speed of connections over which the reply travels and the speed at which the algorithm is executed , are not specified by the algorithm and the state , so they are part of the environment , albeit a different part from that ordinarily involved in answering queries . so the complete environment could conceivably assemble replies that include the time that the algorithm sees them . such an environment would be quite unusual , and of course it would have to be subject to the constraint that the time stamps accurately reflect at least the order in which replies are received . but , if such an environment can be imagined , could we use it , at least for theoretical purposes , to avoid the need for the pre - order compnent in histories ? if so , then the present paper could stay closer to the work previously done in @xcite , and we would have been quite happy to avoid the extra work . the pre - orders are , however , needed , even for theoretical purposes . consider the broker example above . part of the broker s algorithm tells him what to do if both clients reply . to model that in the style of @xcite , assuming that replies include accurate information about their arrival times , the algorithm would have to wait for both replies , read both time stamps , and act accordingly . but in fact , the algorithm does not wait for both replies . if it receives one reply , it acts on the basis of that reply without waiting for the other . in effect , this algorithm and others like it decide the relative order of receipt of two replies as soon as one of the replies is received . if one is received and the other is nt , then the received one is earlier . this common sense approach is unavailable if the timing comparisons have to be based on reading time stamps embedded in the replies . thus , even if we constrained our environments to always provide time stamps that accurately indicate the time a reply is seen by the algorithm , we would still need machinery like that in the present paper to decide the relative order of two replies even if only one has been seen . even though the pre - order @xmath34 is about the replies , the formal definition says that it pre - orders the domain of the answer function @xmath54 , i.e. , the set of queries . the reason is a technical one : different queries may receive the same reply , and in that case the single reply could occur at several positions in the ordering . each query , on the other hand , is issued just once because , in accordance with the conventions of @xcite , if what appears to be the same query is issued repeatedly , then we regard the repetitions as distinct queries ( since they can receive different replies ) . thus , the order in which replies are received can be conveniently represented by pre - ordering the associated queries . it may be more intuitive to think of pre - ordering the set of pairs ( query , reply ) , i.e. , the graph of the answer function . this view of the situation would make no essential difference , since these pairs are in canonical bijection with the queries . we emphasize that the timing we are concerned with here is logical time , not physical time . that is , it is measured by the progress of the computation , not by an external clock . if external , physical , clock time is relevant , as in real - time algorithms , it would have to be provided separately by the environment , for it is not part of the program or of the state . the relevant values of the physical time could be regarded as the replies to repeated queries asking `` what time is it ? '' in particular , we regard a query as being issued by the algorithm as soon as the information causing that query ( in the sense of the interaction postulate below ) is available . this viewpoint would be incorrect in terms of physical time , for the algorithm may be slow to issue a query even after it has the prerequisite information . but we can regard a query as being logically available as soon as information causing it is present . this is why we include , in histories , only the relative ordering of replies . the ordering of queries relative to replies or relative to each other is then determined . the logical time of a query is the same as the logical time of the last of the replies causing that query . our use of pre - orders rather than partial orders , i.e. , our allowing two distinct replies to be received simultaneously , also reflects our concern with logical rather than physical time . one can argue that no two events are exactly simultaneous in the physical sense ( though they could be so nearly simultaneous that one should treat them as simultaneous ) , but logical simultaneity is certainly possible . it means merely that whenever the computation had access to one of the replies it also had access to the other . the linearity of the pre - ordering , i.e. , the requirement that every two replies be received either in one order or in the other or simultaneously , formalizes the following important part of our view of sequential - time ( as opposed to distributed ) algorithms . ( it is not a postulate of our formal development but an informal principle that underlies some of our definitions and postulates . ) one executor principle a small - step algorithm is executed by a single , sequential entity . even if there are ( boundedly many ) subprocesses running in parallel , they all operate under the control of a single , master executor . the aspect of this principle that is relevant to the linearity of histories can be summarized in the following informal principle , in which the first part emphasizes the role of the master executor in the interaction with the environment , while the second part is a consequence of the sequentiality of the executor . holistic principle the environment can send replies only to ( the executor of ) the algorithm , not directly to parts of it ; similarly it receives queries only from the algorithm , not from parts of it . any two replies are received by the algorithm either simultaneously or one after the other . the pre - orders in our histories are intended to represent the order in which replies are received by the master executor . if there are subprocesses , then the master may pass the replies ( or information derived from them ) to these subprocesses at different times , but that timing is part of the algorithm s internal operation ( possibly also influenced by the replies to other queries like `` what time is it ? '' ) , not part of the environment interaction that histories are intended to model . the linearity of our pre - orders reflects the fact that they represent the ordering as seen by a single , sequential entity ; this entity sees things in a sequence . in more detail , we picture the execution of one step of an algorithm as follows . first , the algorithm ( or , strictly speaking , its executor ) computes as much as it can with only the information provided by the current state . this part of the computation , the first phase , will in general include issuing some queries . then the algorithm pauses until it is `` awakened '' by the environment , which has replied to some ( not necessarily all ) of the queries from phase 1 . the algorithm proceeds , in phase 2 , to compute as much as it can using the state , the new information from the environment , and the information recorded during phase 1 . then it again pauses until the environment has provided some more replies ( possibly to queries from phase 2 and possibly to previously unanswered queries from phase 1 ) and awakens the algorithm . then phase 3 begins , and this pattern continues until the algorithm determines , in some phase , that it is ready to complete the current step , either by executing certain updates ( computed during the various phases ) of its state or by failing ( in which case the whole computation fails and there is no next state ) . the logical ordering of replies refers to the phases at which replies were received . that is , if @xmath55 , this means that the reply @xmath56 to @xmath57 was received at an earlier phase than the reply @xmath58 to @xmath59 . similarly , @xmath60 means that these two replies were received at the same phase . we have assumed , in the preceding description of phases , that the algorithm is awakened to begin a new phase only when some new reply has been provided . one may worry that this is not general enough , that the environment can awaken the algorithm even when no new replies are available . the rest of this remark is devoted to discussing this issue and justifying our assumption ; it can safely be skipped by readers not worried about such subtleties . in such a case , it is natural to assume that the algorithm , having determined that it has no new information with which to advance the computation , simply resumes its pause until awakened again . in order for the algorithm to be a small - step algorithm , such fruitless awakenings must happen only a bounded number of times per step , with the bound depending only on the algorithm . the reason is that , even if all the algorithm does when awakened is to observe that no new replies have arrived , this observing is work , and a small - step algorithm can do only a bounded amount of it per step . it seems possible , however , for an algorithm to admit a few fruitless awakenings per step , and the results of the computation could even depend on these awakenings . consider , for example , an algorithm that works as follows . it begins by issuing a query @xmath15 and pausing . when awakened , it outputs 1 and halts if there is a reply to @xmath15 ; otherwise , it pauses again . when awakened a second time , it outputs 2 if there is now a reply to @xmath15 , and , whether or not there is a reply , it halts . notice that , if @xmath15 receives the reply @xmath61 , then whether this is seen at the first or the second awakening does nt affect the history , which consists of the function @xmath62 and the unique pre - order on its domain @xmath63 . so the history fails to capture all the information from the environment that is relevant to the computation . there are two ways to correct this discrepancy . one , which we shall adopt , is to regard the fruitless awakening as amounting to a reply to an implicit query , of the form `` i m willing to respond to awakening . '' ( for several fruitless awakenings , there would have to be several such queries , distinguished perhaps by numerical labels . ) now the two scenarios considered above , where @xmath15 has received a reply at the first awakening or only at the second , are distinguished in the histories , because the reply to the new , implicit query will be simultaneous with the reply to @xmath15 in the one scenario and will strictly precede the reply to @xmath15 in the other scenario . an alternative approach would be to avoid introducing such implicit queries but instead to replace the pre - order constituents of histories by slightly more complicated objects , `` pre - orders with holes . '' the idea is that the scenario where an answer to @xmath15 is available only at the second awakening would be represented by the answer function @xmath62 as above , but the pre - order would be replaced with something that says `` first there s a hole and then @xmath15 . '' formalizing this is actually quite easy , as long as the pre - order is linear and the set @xmath37 to be pre - ordered is finite ( as it will be in the situations of interest to us ) . a linear pre - order of @xmath37 with holes is just a function @xmath51 from @xmath37 into the natural numbers . for any @xmath64 , the elements of @xmath65 constitute the @xmath66 equivalence class , which may be empty in case of a hole . ordinary pre - orders correspond to the special case where the image @xmath67 is an initial segment of n. although the approach using pre - orders with holes corresponds more directly to intuition , we prefer the first approach , with implicit queries , for two reasons . first , it allows us to use the standard terminology of pre - orders rather than introducing something new . second , its chief disadvantage , the need for implicit queries , is mitigated by the fact that we need other sorts of implicit queries for other purposes . for example , in ( * ? ? ? * section 2 ) , implicit queries modeled the algorithm s receptiveness to incoming ( unsolicited ) messages and to multiple answers to the same query . notice that , in all cases , our implicit queries represent the algorithm s willingness to pay attention to something provided by the environment . we next define initial segments of histories , which will serve to model the interaction with the environment part way through a step . let @xmath68 be a pre - order of a set @xmath37 . an _ initial segment _ of @xmath37 with respect to @xmath68 is a subset @xmath69 of @xmath37 such that whenever @xmath39 and @xmath70 then @xmath71 . an _ initial segment _ of @xmath68 is the restriction of @xmath68 to an initial segment of @xmath37 with respect to @xmath68 . an _ initial segment _ of a history @xmath72 is a history @xmath73 , where @xmath69 is an initial segment of @xmath36 with respect to @xmath34 . ( we use the standard notation @xmath74 for the restriction of a function or a relation to a set . ) we write @xmath75 to mean that the history @xmath76 is an initial segment of the history @xmath35 . notice that any initial segment with respect to a pre - order @xmath68 is closed under the associated equivalence @xmath77 . notice also that if @xmath78 then @xmath79 is an initial segment of @xmath34 . we also point out for future reference that , if two histories @xmath80 and @xmath81 are initial segments of the same @xmath35 , then one of @xmath80 and @xmath81 is an initial segment of the other . intuitively , if @xmath72 is the history of an algorithm s interaction with the environment up to a certain phase , then a proper initial segment of this history describes the interaction up to some earlier phase . if @xmath68 pre - orders the set @xmath37 and if @xmath82 , then we define two associated initial segments as follows . @xmath83 the following postulate is almost the same as the postulate of the same name in @xcite . the only difference is that we use histories instead of answer functions . this reflects the fact that the decision to issue a query can be influenced by the timing of the replies to previous queries . interaction postulate for each state @xmath11 , the algorithm determines a binary relation @xmath13 , called the _ causality relation _ , between finite histories and potential queries . the intended meaning of @xmath84 is that , if the algorithm s current state is @xmath11 and the history of its interaction so far ( as seen by the algorithm during the current step ) is @xmath35 , then it will issue the query @xmath15 unless it has already done so . when we say that the history so far is @xmath35 , we mean not only that the environment has given the replies indicated in @xmath33 in the order given by @xmath34 , but also that no other queries have been answered . thus , although @xmath35 explicitly contains only positive information about the replies received so far , it also implicitly contains the negative information that there have been no other replies . of course , if additional replies are received later , so that the new history has @xmath35 as a proper initial segment , then @xmath15 is still among the issued queries , because it was issued at the earlier time when the history was only @xmath35 . this observation is formalized as follows . for any state @xmath11 and history @xmath35 , we define sets of queries @xmath85 thus , @xmath86 is the set of queries that have been issued by the algorithm , in state @xmath11 , by the time the history is @xmath35 , and @xmath87 is the subset of those that have , as yet , no replies . [ descr - causes ] we have described the causality relation in terms of detailed causes , histories @xmath35 that contain the algorithm s whole interaction with environment up to the time the caused query is issued . a text describing the algorithm , either informally or in some programming language , would be more likely to describe causes in terms of partial information about the history . for example , it might say `` if the query @xmath51 has received the reply @xmath8 but @xmath88 has no reply yet , then issue @xmath15 . '' this description would correspond to a large ( possibly infinite ) set of instances @xmath89 of the causality relation , namely one instance for every history @xmath35 that fits the description , i.e. , such that @xmath90 and @xmath91 . more generally , whenever we are given a description of the conditions under which various queries are to be issued , we can similarly convert it into a causality relation ; each of the conditions would be replaced by the set of finite histories that satisfy the condition . the reverse transformation , from detailed causes representing the whole history to finite descriptions , is not possible in general . the difficulty is that the finite descriptions might have to specify all of the negative information implicit in a history , and this might be an infinite amount of information . in most situations , however , the set of queries that might be issued is finite and known . then any finite history @xmath35 can be converted into a finite description , simply by adding , to the positive information explicit in @xmath35 , the negative information that there have been no replies to any other queries among the finitely many that could be issued . for semantical purposes , as in the present section , it seems natural to think of causes as being the detailed histories . from the behavior of an algorithm , one can easily determine whether @xmath84 ( at least when @xmath35 is attainable as in definition [ att - def ] below and we ignore causes of @xmath15 that have proper initial segments already causing @xmath15 ) ; just provide the algorithm with replies according to @xmath35 and see whether it produces @xmath15 at that moment ( and not earlier ) . it is not easy to determine , on the basis of the behavior , whether @xmath15 is issued whenever a description , like `` @xmath51 has reply @xmath8 and @xmath88 has no reply '' is satisfied , as this involves the behavior in a large , possibly infinite number of situations . for syntactic purposes , on the other hand , descriptions seem more natural than detailed histories . and indeed , the syntax of our asms ( in @xcite ) will not involve histories directly but will involve descriptions like `` @xmath51 has reply @xmath8 and @xmath88 has no reply '' in the guards of conditional rules . notice that there is no guarantee that @xmath92 , although this will be the case for attainable histories ( defined below ) . in general , a history as defined above may contain answers for queries that it and its initial segments do nt cause . it may also contain answers for queries that would be issued but only at a later phase than where the answers appear . in this sense , histories need not be possible records of actual interactions , between the algorithm and its environment , under the causality relation that is given by the algorithm . the following definition describes the histories that are consistent with the given causality relation . informally , these are the histories where every query in the domain has a legitimate reason , under the causality relation , for being there . a history @xmath35 is _ coherent _ , with respect to a state @xmath11 or its associated causality relation @xmath13 , if @xmath93 , and the linear order of the @xmath46-equivalence classes induced by @xmath34 is a well - order . the first requirement in this definition , which can be equivalently rewritten as @xmath94 says that , if a query @xmath15 receives an answer at some phase , then it must have been issued on the basis of what happened in strictly earlier phases . in particular , the queries answered in the first phase , i.e. , those in the first @xmath46-class , must be caused by the empty history . the second requirement is needed only because we allow infinite histories ; finite linear orders are automatically well - orders . the purpose of the second requirement is to support the usual understanding of `` cause '' by prohibiting an infinite regress of causes . it will follow from the bounded work postulate below in conjunction with the interaction postulate above , that we can confine attention to histories whose domains are finite . then clause 2 in the definition of coherence would be automatically satisfied . nevertheless , we allow a coherent history @xmath35 to have infinite domain and even to have infinitely many equivalence classes , with respect to @xmath34 , provided their ordering induced by @xmath34 is a well - ordering . there are two reasons for this generality . first , it will allow us to state the bounded work postulate in a relatively weak form and then to deduce the stronger fact that the histories we really need to consider ( the attainable ones ) are finite . second , it avoids formally combining issues that are conceptually separate . finiteness is , of course , an essential aspect of computation , especially of small - step computation , and the bounded work postulate will formalize this aspect . but the notions of coherent and attainable histories are conceptually independent of finiteness , and so we do not impose finiteness in their definitions . [ cpt1 ] as mentioned above , the notion of coherence is intended to capture the idea of a history that makes sense , given the algorithm s causality relation . here we implicitly use the fact that we are describing an entire algorithm , not a component that works with other components to constitute an algorithm . if we were dealing with a component @xmath95 , working in the presence of other components , then it would be possible for queries to be answered without having been asked by @xmath95 , simply because another component could have asked the query . see @xcite for a study of components . it follows immediately from the definitions that any initial segment of a coherent history is coherent . a history @xmath35 for a state @xmath11 is _ complete _ if @xmath96 . thus , completeness means that all queries that have been issued have also been answered . it can be regarded as a sort of converse to coherence , since the latter means that all queries that have been answered have also been issued earlier . if a complete history has arisen in the course of a computation , then there will be no further interaction with the environment during this step . no further interaction can originate with the environment , because no queries remain to be answered . no further interaction can originate with the algorithm , since @xmath35 and its initial segments do nt cause any further queries . so the algorithm must either proceed to the next step ( by updating its state ) or fail . at the end of a step the algorithm will , unless it fails , perform some set of updates . the next postulate will express this property of algorithms formally . first , we adopt the formalization of the notion of update that was used in earlier work , starting with @xcite . a _ location _ in a state @xmath11 is a pair @xmath97 where @xmath98 is a dynamic function symbol from @xmath21 and @xmath99 is a tuple of elements of @xmath11 , of the right length to serve as an argument for the function @xmath100 interpreting the symbol @xmath98 in the state @xmath11 . the _ value _ of this location in @xmath11 is @xmath101 . an _ update _ for @xmath11 is a pair @xmath102 consisting of a location @xmath103 and an element @xmath104 of @xmath11 . an update @xmath102 is _ trivial _ ( in @xmath11 ) if @xmath104 is the value of @xmath103 in @xmath11 . we often omit parentheses and brackets , writing locations as @xmath105 instead of @xmath106 and writing updates as @xmath107 or @xmath108 instead of @xmath109 or @xmath110 . the intended meaning of an update @xmath107 is that the interpretation of @xmath98 is to be changed ( if necessary , i.e. , if the update is not trivial ) so that its value at @xmath99 is @xmath104 . because our algorithms are not required to be ordinary , they may finish a step without reaching a complete history . the following postulate says that they must finish the step when they reach a complete history , if they have not already done so earlier . step postulate part a the algorithm determines , for each state @xmath11 , a set @xmath111 of _ final histories_. every complete , coherent history has an initial segment ( possibly the whole history ) in @xmath111 . intuitively , a history is final for @xmath11 if , whenever it arises in the course of a computation in @xmath11 , the algorithm completes its step , either by failing or by executing its updates and proceeding to the next step . since incoherent histories can not arise under the algorithm s causality relation , it will not matter which such histories are final . we could have postulated that only coherent histories can be final , but there is no need to do so . it does no harm to allow incoherent final histories , though they are irrelevant to the algorithm s computation . by allowing them , we may slightly simplify the description , as algorithms subject to our postulates , of programs written in some programming language ; if the language allows one to say `` finish the step '' then this can be directly translated into final histories , without having to check for coherence . similar comments apply to the remaining parts of the step postulate below , where we require update sets or failure for coherent histories but allow them also for incoherent ones . [ att - def ] a history for a state @xmath11 is _ attainable _ ( in @xmath11 ) if it is coherent and no proper initial segment of it is final . since initial segments of coherent histories are coherent , it follows that initial segments of attainable histories are attainable . the attainable histories are those that can occur under the given causality relation and the given choice of final histories . that is , not only are the queries answered in an order consistent with @xmath13 ( coherence ) , but the history does not continue beyond where @xmath111 says it should stop . our earlier statements to the effect that incoherent histories do nt matter can be strengthened to say that unattainable histories do nt matter . thus , for example , although we allow one final history to be a proper initial segment of another ( even when both are coherent ) , the longer of the two will be unattainable , so its being final is irrelevant . step postulate part b for each state @xmath11 , the algorithm determines that certain histories _ succeed _ and others _ fail_. every final , attainable history either succeeds or fails but not both . we write @xmath112 for the set of successful final histories and @xmath113 for the set of failing final histories . non - final or unattainable histories may succeed or fail or both , but this will be irrelevant to the behavior of the algorithm . if we restrict attention to attainable histories , then @xmath112 and @xmath113 partition @xmath111 . the intended meaning of `` succeed '' and `` fail '' is that a successful final history is one in which the algorithm finishes its step and performs a set of updates of its state , while a failing final history is one in which the algorithm can not continue the step ends , but there is no next state , not even a repetition of the current state . such a situation can arise if the algorithm computes inconsistent updates . it can also arise if the environment gives inappropriate answers to some queries . for more about failures , see the discussion following the update postulate in ( * ? ? ? * section 5 ) . there is , however , one difference between our present situation and that in @xcite . there , the algorithm depended upon getting answers to all its queries , so it is reasonable to expect that an inappropriate answer always results in failure . in our present situation , however , the algorithm may be willing to finish its step without getting the answer to a certain query . in this case , an inappropriate answer to that query need not force failure . when a history in @xmath114 arises during the computation , the algorithm should perform its updates and proceed to the next step . we formalize this in the third and last part of the step postulate , keeping in mind that only attainable histories can arise . the notation @xmath115 for the update set is taken from @xcite . the superscript @xmath116 refers to the fact that trivial updates can be included in the update set . although they do not affect the next state , they can affect whether clashes occur when our algorithm is run in parallel with another . step postulate part c for each attainable history @xmath117 for a state @xmath11 , the algorithm determines an _ update set _ @xmath118 , whose elements are updates for @xmath11 . it also produces a _ next state _ @xmath119 , which has the same base set as @xmath11 , has @xmath120 if @xmath121 , and otherwise interprets function symbols as in @xmath11 . the step postulate is the analog , for our present situation , of the update postulate of @xcite . there are two differences between these postulates , reflecting the two requirements of ordinariness in @xcite that have been lifted in the present work . first , since we now consider algorithms that can finish a step without waiting for all queries to be answered , we include in the notion of algorithm the information about when to finish a step . this is the notion of final history introduced in part a of the step postulate . if an algorithm never finishes a step while queries are still pending , then its final histories could be defined as being the complete histories ( or the complete , coherent histories ) , and there would be no need to specify f separately in the algorithm . the complete , coherent histories correspond to the contexts , as defined in @xcite . second , because we allow an algorithm to take into account the order in which it receives replies to its queries , decisions about failures and updates depend not only on the answer function @xmath33 but on the whole history @xmath35 , including the ordering information contained in @xmath34 . the intuition and motivation behind the other aspects of the step postulate are discussed in detail in @xcite and @xcite . in notations like @xmath111 , @xmath114 , @xmath122 , @xmath118 , and @xmath119 , we may omit @xmath11 if only one @xmath11 is under discussion . we may also add the algorithm @xmath20 as a superscript if several algorithms are under discussion . notice that the step postulate requires @xmath118 and @xmath119 to be defined when @xmath35 is an attainable , final , successful history , but it allows them to be defined also for other histories . any values they may have for other histories , however , will not affect the algorithm s computation . notice also that the next state is completely determined by the current state and the update set . so when describing an algorithm , we need not explicitly describe @xmath123 if we have described @xmath115 . if @xmath118 clashes , i.e. , if it contains two distinct updates of the same location , then the description of @xmath119 is contradictory , so the next state can not exist . thus , if such a @xmath35 is attainable and final , it must be failing . that is , clashes imply failure . [ ex;broker : re ] we revisit the broker example [ ex : broker ] in terms of our definitions . part of the broker s algorithm is easy to describe : the empty history causes two queries , @xmath124 and @xmath125 . query @xmath126 expresses the take - it - or - leave - it offer to client @xmath127 to buy a block of @xmath8 shares of stock @xmath128 at price @xmath51 . a history that contains a positive reply from just one client is final and successful and produces updates recording a sale to that client . note that , if both clients reply positively but at different times , then the history as an initial segment containing only the reply from the client who answered first , so the stock is sold to this client . it is also easy to handle histories in which both clients answer negatively ; such a history is successful and final but results in no updates ( or perhaps in an update recording that these clients had the chance to buy the stock and turned it down ) . note that , although this situation represents a failure of the broker to accomplish his aim , it should not be considered a failing history , as it does not mean that the broker goes out of business . what if the broker receives positive replies from both clients at the same time ? it is tempting and perhaps realistic to assume that this situation can not occur , but that assumption amounts to a constraint on the environment , and we do not consider in this paper such a restriction of the theory to some `` admissible '' histories . furthermore , when the broker really can not receive two replies simultaneously , this will be because of some aspect of his receiving mechanism , and it seems that such aspects can be modeled using one of the following ideas . the broker could systematically prefer one of the clients . then a history with simultaneous positive replies from both clients would be final and successful and would produce updates recording a sale to the preferred client . alternatively , the broker could break ties non - deterministically . that is , a history with simultaneous positive replies from both clients would cause a new query to the environment , asking for a non - deterministic choice of a client . any reply naming a client would result in a successful final history with a sale to that client . to finish the specification of the algorithm , we must say what is to be done if netiher client replies , or if one replies negatively and the other does nt reply . one approach is to declare such histories not to be final . the broker simply waits , perhaps forever . a more realistic approach is that the broker s offers to the clients include a time limit . an easy way to model this is to have the empty history cause , in addition to the offers to the clients , a third query @xmath129 , to be thought of as a time - out query , i.e. , a request to be informed by the environment , when the time limit has been reached . then any history with a reply to this query but no positive reply from a client will be final and successful and result in no update ( or an update recording that there was no sale and why ) . the algorithm can still hang , if the environment fails to respond to the time - out query , but that seems a reasonable result for a broker who imposes a time - limit but ca nt find out when it has been reached . although the primary subject of this paper is intra - step interaction between an algorithm and its environment , it is not our intention to prohibit inter - step interaction of the sort described in @xcite and mentioned in [ sec : overview : seqth ] . inter - step interaction is , however , quite easy to describe ; the environment is permitted to make arbitrary changes to the state s dynamic functions between the steps of the algorithm . thus , a _ run _ of an algorithm is a ( finite or infinite ) sequence of states , starting with an initial state , in which each state but the first is obtained from its predecessor either by an intervention of the environment or by a step of the algorithm . in the intervention case , the successor state has the same base set and static functions as the predecessor , but the dynamic functions can be arbitrarily altered . in the case of an algorithm step , there is a successful final history @xmath35 , describing the environment s replies to the algorithm s queries during the step , and if the state before the step was @xmath11 then the state after the step is @xmath119 . since what happens in the intervention steps is quite arbitrary , our concern in this paper is to analyze what happens in the algorithmic steps . the notion of run , therefore , occurs only in peripheral remarks like this one , not in the main development . a referee asked why both intra - step and inter - step interaction are needed . in fact , one could eliminate inter - step interaction , but it would require considerable cooperation from the environment because of the following complications . note that there is no a priori bound on the number of locations that the environment could update in an inter - step action . so that action can not be simulated by a small - step algorithm in one step . this problem can be circumvented by having the algorithm ask about these environmental updates only when they are needed for the computation . this means that the environment must `` remember '' these updates until they are needed ; furthermore , it must keep track of whether these updates are overwritten by the algorithm s own updates . as in previous work , starting with @xcite , we require that the information relevant to the algorithm s computation that is given by the state must be explicitly given by the structure of the state , not implicitly given by the particular nature of its elements . formally , this means that the computation must be invariant under isomorphisms . any isomorphism @xmath130 between states can be extended in an obvious , canonical way to act on queries , answer functions , histories , locations , updates , etc . we use the same symbol @xmath127 for all these extensions . isomorphism postulate suppose @xmath11 is a state and @xmath130 is an isomorphism of @xmath21-structures . then : @xmath131 is a state , initial if @xmath11 is . @xmath127 preserves causality , that is , if @xmath84 then @xmath132 . @xmath127 preserves finality , success , and failure , that is , @xmath133 and @xmath134 . @xmath127 preserves updates , that is , @xmath135 for all histories @xmath35 for @xmath11 . in the last part of this postulate , and throughout this paper , we adopt the convention that an equation between possibly undefined expressions is to be understood as implying that if either side is defined then so is the other . we have required that isomorphisms preserve even the irrelevant parts of the algorithm , like update sets for unattainable or non - final histories . this requirement could be dropped , thereby weakening our postulate , without any damage to our results . nevertheless , it seems a natural requirement in a general description of algorithms . the intuition behind it is that , even if an algorithm includes irrelevant information , the states should still be abstract ; not even the irrelevant information should be able to `` see '' the particular nature of the elements of the state . for example , if @xmath136 is an isomorphism , and @xmath35 is an unattainable ( hence irrelevant ) history in @xmath111 , then our postulate requires @xmath137 ( which is equally unattainable and thus irrelevant in @xmath131 ) to be in @xmath138 . to allow the contrary would be to allow the algorithm to refer to the difference between @xmath11 and @xmath131 , a difference that , because of the isomorphism , involves only the particular elements constituting these states , not their abstract structure the final postulate formalizes the requirement that a small - step algorithm can do only a bounded amount of work in any one step . the bound depends only on the algorithm . work includes assembling queries ( from elements of the state and labels ) and issuing them , computing what queries to issue , deciding whether the current history suffices to finish the step , deciding whether the computation has failed , and computing updates . our formalization of this closely follows the corresponding postulate in ( * ? ? ? * section 5 ) ; the use of a set of terms to represent the bounded part of the state that the algorithm looks at goes back to @xcite . bounded work postulate there is a bound , depending only on the algorithm , for the lengths of the tuples in @xmath86 , for all states @xmath11 and final , attainable histories @xmath35 . there is a bound , depending only on the algorithm , for the cardinality @xmath139 , for all states @xmath11 and final , attainable histories @xmath35 . there is a finite set @xmath5 of @xmath21-terms ( possibly involving variables ) , depending only on the algorithm , with the following property . suppose @xmath11 and @xmath140 are two states and @xmath35 is a history for both of them . suppose further that each term in @xmath5 has the same value in @xmath11 as in @xmath140 when the variables are given the same values in @xmath141 . then : if @xmath84 then @xmath142 ( so in particular @xmath15 is a query for @xmath140 ) . if @xmath35 is in @xmath112 or @xmath113 , then it is also in @xmath143 or @xmath144 , respectively . @xmath145 . this completes our list of postulates , so we are ready to define the class of algorithms to be treated in this paper and @xcite . [ alg - def ] an _ interactive , small - step algorithm _ is any entity satisfying the states , interaction , step , isomorphism , and bounded work postulates . since these are the only algorithms under consideration in most of this paper , we often omit `` interactive , small - step '' ; on the other hand , when we want to emphasize the difference between these algorithms and the `` ordinary algorithms '' treated in @xcite , we may refer to the present class of algorithms as `` general , interactive , small - step algorithms '' . as we explained near the beginning of this section , definition [ alg - def ] provides a formal meaning for `` ( interactive , small - step ) algorithm '' , whereas the preceding discussion , leading up to the postulates , was based on an informal notion of ( interactive , small - step ) algorithm . the definition expresses our belief that the formal notion accurately represents the informal one , i.e. , that our postulates adequately describe the intuitive notion . the remainder of this section is devoted to some terminology and results connected with the bounded work postulate . a set @xmath5 with the property required in the third part of the bounded work postulate is called a _ bounded exploration witness _ for the algorithm . two pairs @xmath146 and @xmath147 , consisting of states @xmath11 and @xmath140 and a single @xmath35 that is a history for both , are said to _ agree _ on @xmath5 if , as in the postulate , each term in @xmath5 has the same value in @xmath11 as in @xmath140 when the variables are given the same values in @xmath141 . the first two parts of the bounded work postulate assert bounds for final , attainable histories . they imply the corresponding bounds for all attainable histories , thanks to the following lemma . let @xmath11 be a state . any coherent history for @xmath11 is an initial segment of a complete , coherent history for @xmath11 . any attainable history for @xmath11 is an initial segment of a final , attainable history for @xmath11 . since @xmath11 is fixed throughout the proof , we omit it from the notation . to prove the first assertion , let @xmath35 be a coherent history . according to the definition , its order - type ( meaning , strictly speaking , the order - type of the ordering induced by @xmath34 on the equivalence classes under @xmath46 ) is some ordinal number @xmath12 . we shall inductively define a sequence of coherent histories @xmath148 , starting with @xmath149 . here @xmath64 will range over either the set n of all natural numbers or the set of natural numbers up to some finite @xmath150 to be determined during the construction . after @xmath148 is defined , if it is complete , then stop the construction , i.e. , set @xmath151 . if @xmath148 is incomplete , this means that the set @xmath152 is nonempty . extend the answer function @xmath153 by adjoining @xmath154 to its domain and assigning it arbitrary values ( in @xmath11 ) there . call the resulting answer function @xmath155 , and make it into a history @xmath156 by pre - ordering its domain as follows . on @xmath157 , @xmath158 agrees with @xmath159 . all elements of @xmath160 are @xmath158 all elements of @xmath154 . elements of @xmath154 are @xmath158 only each other . in other words , we extend the ordering of @xmath157 by adding @xmath154 at the end , as a single equivalence class . it is straightforward to check that each @xmath148 ( if defined , i.e. , if the sequence hasnt ended before @xmath64 ) is a coherent history ; the order - type of its equivalence classes is @xmath161 . if @xmath148 is defined for only finitely many @xmath64 , then this is because the last @xmath148 was complete , and so we have the required result . it remains to consider the case where @xmath148 is defined for all natural numbers @xmath64 . in this case , let @xmath162 be the union of all the @xmath148 s . ( more formally , if we regard functions and orderings as sets of ordered pairs , then @xmath163 is the union of the @xmath153 s , and the pre - order @xmath164 is the union of the @xmath159 s . ) then @xmath162 is also coherent . indeed , if @xmath165 then there is some @xmath64 such that @xmath166 . as @xmath148 is coherent , @xmath167 . but , since each @xmath148 is an initial segment of the next , and therefore of @xmath162 , we have @xmath168 and so @xmath169 . furthermore , the order - type of @xmath162 is @xmath170 ( where @xmath171 is the order - type of the natural numbers ) , so it is well - ordered . to finish the proof of the first part of the lemma , we need only check that @xmath162 is complete . suppose , toward a contradiction , that @xmath172 . so there is an initial segment @xmath76 of @xmath162 such that @xmath173 . by the interaction postulate , @xmath76 is finite , so it is an initial segment of @xmath148 for some @xmath64 . then @xmath174 that contradicts the assumption that @xmath172 , so we have shown that @xmath162 is complete . thus , @xmath175 is an initial segment of the complete , coherent history @xmath162 , and the first assertion of the lemma is proved . to prove the second assertion , let @xmath35 be an attainable history . in particular , it is coherent , so , by the first assertion , it is an initial segment of a complete , coherent history @xmath162 . by part a of the step postulate , @xmath162 has an initial segment @xmath76 that is a final history . if @xmath162 has several initial segments that are final histories , then let @xmath76 be the shortest of them ; thus no proper initial segment of @xmath76 is final . since both @xmath35 and @xmath76 are initial segments of @xmath162 , one of them is an initial segment of the other . since @xmath35 is attainable and @xmath76 is final , @xmath76 can not be a proper initial segment of @xmath35 . therefore , @xmath35 is an initial segment of @xmath76 . furthermore , @xmath76 is coherent , because it is an initial segment of the coherent history @xmath162 . it follows , since no proper initial segment of @xmath76 is final , that @xmath76 is attainable , as desired . the following corollary extends the first assertion in the bounded work postulate to histories that need not be final . [ bd - query ] there is a bound , depending only on the algorithm , for the lengths of the tuples in @xmath86 for all states @xmath11 and all attainable histories @xmath35 . the bound on lengths of queries issued by final , attainable histories , given by the bounded work postulate , applies to all attainable histories , because these are , by the lemma , initial segments of final ones . the next corollary similarly extends the second assertion of the bounded work postulate , and adds some related information . [ bd - dom ] there is a bound , depending only on the algorithm , for @xmath139 , for all states @xmath11 and attainable histories @xmath35 . the same number also bounds @xmath176 for all attainable @xmath35 . by the lemma , any attainable history @xmath35 is an initial segment of a final , attainable history @xmath162 . then @xmath177 . the bound provided by the bounded work postulate for @xmath178 thus applies to @xmath35 as well . this proves the first assertion of the corollary , and the second follows because @xmath35 , being attainable , is coherent , which implies @xmath92 . one of our principal aims in this paper and its sequel @xcite is to show that every algorithm , in the sense defined above , is behaviorally equivalent , in a strong sense , to an asm . of course , this goal presupposes a precise definition of the notion of behavioral equivalence , and we devote the present section to presenting and justifying that definition . as in earlier work on the asm thesis , beginning in @xcite and continuing in @xcite , the definition of equivalence is intended to express the idea that two algorithms behave the same way in all possible situations . we must , of course , make precise what is meant by `` behave the same way '' and by `` possible situations . '' much of what needs to be said here was already said in ( * ? ? ? * section 6 ) in the more restricted context of ordinary interaction , and we shall refer to some of that discussion in motivating our definition of behavioral equivalence . part of the definition of equivalence of algorithms is straightforward . as in previous work , we require equivalent algorithms to have the same states , the same initial states , the same vocabulary , and the same labels . the requirement that they agree as to states and initial states is clearly necessary for any comparison at all between their behaviors , specifically the aspect of behavior given by the progression of states in a run . the requirement that they agree as to vocabulary is actually a consequence of agreement as to states ( and the requirement , in the definition of algorithm , that there be at least one state ) , because any structure determines its vocabulary . the requirement that they agree as to labels ensures that the algorithms have , in any state , the same potential queries ; this is needed for any comparison between their behaviors , since issuing queries is observable behavior . the requirements just discussed say that equivalent algorithms agree as to all the items introduced in the states postulate . it is tempting to go through the remaining postulates , look for statements of the form `` the algorithm determines '' such - and - such , and require equivalent algorithms to have the same such - and - such . unfortunately , this approach , which in @xcite would produce the correct notion of equivalence , is too restrictive when applied to interactive algorithms in @xcite and the present paper . the difficulties were already pointed out in ( * ? ? ? * section 6 ) in connection with the causality relation . the examples given there exhibit the following two sorts of problems . first , a causality relation could have instances @xmath84 whose @xmath35 could never actually occur in the execution of the algorithm , for example because @xmath179 contains queries that the algorithm would never issue . second , as in ( * ? ? ? * example 6.4 ) , the @xmath35 in an instance @xmath84 of causality could contain redundant elements , such as a query - reply pair that would have to be present in order for another query in @xmath179 to be issued . algorithms whose causality relations differ only in such irrelevant ways should count as equivalent . that is , we should care only about what queries the algorithm issues in response to histories that can actually occur when this algorithm runs . similar comments apply to the remaining ingredients of an algorithm , in which histories are used . the notions of final , successful , and failing histories and the update sets should not be required to agree completely when two algorithms are equivalent ; it suffices that they agree on those histories that can actually occur . [ cpt2 ] we emphasize again that we are dealing here with a situation where only the algorithm and its environment are involved . when several algorithms interact ( and we do not choose to consider each as a part of the environment for the others ) , the situation would be more complex . consider , for example , two algorithms that function as components in a larger computation . the first of these components might issue a query whose reply is used by the second . in that case , instances @xmath84 of the second component s causality relation can be relevant even if that component would never issue the queries in @xmath179 . some aspects of this situation will arise in @xcite when we discuss the `` do in parallel '' construct of asms ; a thorough discussion will be provided in @xcite . to formalize the preceding discussion , we must still say something about the notion of a history that can actually appear . we have already introduced a precise version of this notion , namely the notion of an attainable history . this notion , however , depends on the causality relation and the notion of finality given with the algorithm . when we define equivalence of two algorithms , which one s attainability should we use ? there are two natural choices : require the algorithms to agree ( as to queries issued , finality , success , failure , and updates ) on those histories that are attainable for both algorithms , or require agreement on all histories that are attainable under at least one of the algorithms . ( there are also some less natural choices , for example to require agreement on the histories attainable under the first of the two algorithms ; this threatens to make equivalence unsymmetric . ) fortunately , these options lead , as we shall prove below , to the same notion of equivalence of algorithms . having advertised our notion of equivalence as a strong one , we take the apparently stronger of the natural definitions as the official one and then prove its equivalence with the apparently weaker one . [ equiv - def ] two algorithms are _ behaviorally equivalent _ if they have the same states ( therefore the same vocabulary ) , the same initial states , and the same labels , in each state , they have the same attainable histories , for each state @xmath11 and each attainable history @xmath35 , they have the same set @xmath86 , for each state , the two algorithms have the same attainable histories in @xmath112 and @xmath113 ( and therefore also in @xmath111 ) . for each state and each attainable , final , successful history , they have the same update sets . the following lemma shows that the notion of equivalence is unchanged if we delete the second item in the definition and weaken the subsequent ones to apply only to histories that are attainable for both algorithms . [ equiv - la ] suppose two algorithms have the following properties . they have the same states ( therefore the same vocabulary ) , the same initial states , and the same labels , for each state @xmath11 and each history @xmath35 that is attainable for both algorithms , they have the same set @xmath86 , for each state , any history that is attainable in both algorithms and is in @xmath112 or @xmath113 for one of the algorithms is also in @xmath112 or @xmath113 , respectively , for the other . for each state and each history that is attainable for both and final and successful ( for one and therefore both ) , they have the same update sets . then these two algorithms are equivalent . comparing the hypotheses of the lemma with the definition of equivalence , we see that it suffices to prove that , under the hypotheses of the lemma , any history that is attainable in a state @xmath11 for either algorithm must also be attainable in @xmath11 for the other . indeed , this would directly establish the second clause of the definition , and it would make the subsequent clauses in the definition equivalent to the corresponding hypotheses in the lemma . let @xmath180 and @xmath181 be two algorithms satisfying the hypotheses of the lemma . fix a state @xmath11 for the rest of the proof ; we shall suppress explicit mention of @xmath11 in our notations . to prove that @xmath180 and @xmath181 have the same attainable histories , we first recall that any attainable history ( for either algorithm ) has finite domain by corollary [ bd - dom ] and therefore has finite length . we can therefore proceed by induction on the length of histories . since the empty history vacuously satisfies the definitions of `` coherent '' and `` attainable '' , we need only verify the induction step . consider , therefore , a nonempty history @xmath35 that is attainable for @xmath180 . let the last equivalence class in @xmath179 be @xmath182 and let @xmath76 be the initial segment of @xmath35 obtained by deleting @xmath182 from the domain . then @xmath76 is attainable for @xmath180 ( because @xmath35 is ) and therefore also for @xmath181 ( by induction hypothesis ) . furthermore , the linear order of the equivalence classes of @xmath35 , being finite , is certainly a well - ordering . so to complete the proof that @xmath35 is attainable for @xmath181 , it suffices to verify that it satisfies , with respect to @xmath181 , the first clause in the definition of coherence ( that every @xmath183 is caused by an initial segment that ends before @xmath15 ) and that no proper initial segment of it is final . for the first of these goals , observe that the induction hypothesis gives what we need if @xmath184 , so we need only deal with the case that @xmath185 . in this case , we know that @xmath186 because @xmath35 is coherent for @xmath180 . but since @xmath76 is attainable for both algorithms , the second hypothesis of the lemma applies , and we infer that @xmath187 , as required . for the second goal , we already know that @xmath76 is attainable for @xmath181 and so none of its proper initial segments can be final . the only proper initial segment of @xmath35 not covered by this observation is @xmath76 , so it remains only to show that @xmath76 is not final for @xmath181 . since @xmath76 is not final for @xmath180 ( because @xmath35 is attainable for @xmath180 ) and since @xmath76 is attainable for both algorithms , the third hypothesis of the lemma immediately gives the required conclusion . a referee asked why equivalence of algorithms is not defined in a more usual way , by defining a notion of _ run _ and then defining two algorithms being equivalent if they have the same runs . the alternative definition of equivalence is possible but it is not simpler . a run would not be merely a sequence of states as in @xcite ; it would have to include the queries and replies as well . note also that our definition of equivalence requires that the two algorithms have the same behavior at every state @xmath11 whether @xmath11 is reachable or not . it is thus independent of the set of initial states . to match this , the run - based definition of equivalence should allow runs to start at arbitrary states . we have formally defined the class of interactive small - step algorithms ( definition [ alg - def ] ) by means of postulates that generalize the postulates of @xcite and @xcite , and we have explained why we believe that this definition matches the intuitive notion of interactive small - step algorithm . we have also defined a strong notion of behavioral equivalence for such algorithms . this work provides the essential prerequisites for an analysis of these algorithms in terms of abstract state machines and for the proof of thhe asm thesis in thee small - step interactive case . that analysis and proof will be carried out in @xcite , beginning with the definition of the appropriate class of asms . nick benton , luca cardelli and cdric fournet , `` modern concurrency abstractions for c # , '' in _ proceedings of the 16th european conference on object - oriented programming ( ecoop 2002 ) . june 10 - 14 , 2002 university of mlaga , spain _ , b. magnusson , ed . , springer - verlag , lecture notes in computer science 2374 . andreas blass , yuri gurevich , dean rosenzweig , and benjamin rossman , `` interactive small - step algorithms ii : abstract state machines and the characterization theorem '' ( tentative title ) , in preparation . yuri gurevich , `` evolving algebras : an introductory tutorial '' , bull . eatcs 43 ( feb . 1991 ) , 264284 . reprinted with slight revisions in _ current trends in theoretical computer science : essays and tutorials _ , eds . g. rozenberg and a. salomaa world scientific , 1993 , 223394 . alan m. turing , `` on computable numbers , with an application to the entscheidungsproblem '' , _ proceedings of the london mathematical society _ , series 2 , vol . 42 ( 19361937 ) , 230265 ; correction , _ ibidem _ , vol . 43 , 544546 . reprinted in @xcite and available online at @xmath188 Abstract:
[ "in earlier work , the abstract state machine thesis that arbitrary algorithms are behaviorally equivalent to abstract state machines was established for several classes of algorithms , including ordinary , interactive , small - step algorithms . this was accomplished on the basis of axiomatizations of these classes of algorithms . here we extend the axiomatization and , in a companion paper , the proof , to cover interactive small - step algorithms that are not necessarily ordinary . this means that the algorithms ( 1 ) can complete a step without necessarily waiting for replies to all queries from that step and ( 2 ) can use not only the environment s replies but also the order in which the replies were received ." ]
17,621
17,621
24,000
Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered . Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video . Paper: the acceleration and collimation of powerful bipolar outflows and jets in a variety of astronomical settings are often attributed to the action of magnetic fields ( see , e.g. , @xcite and @xcite for reviews ) . the commonly invoked scenario is that magnetic field lines threading a rotating compact object or its surrounding accretion disk can efficiently tap the rotational energy of the source and accelerate gas to supersonic speeds through centrifugal and/or magnetic pressure - gradient forces . it is argued that the hoop stresses of the twisted field lines can account for the narrowness of many jets and that , in many cases , alternative production mechanisms ( such as thermal driving ) can be excluded on observational grounds . although numerical simulations have provided useful insights into various aspects of hydromagnetic jet production , practical limitations have necessitated complementing this approach with analytic studies . owing to the complexity of the problem , the most general semianalytic solutions obtained so far have been time - independent and self - similar , patterned after the pioneering disk - outflow solutions of @xcite . the advantage of pursuing such solutions is that they are exact and self - consistent , and that they can be systematically classified ( e.g. , * ? ? ? furthermore , these solutions are evidently rich enough to capture most of the relevant physics , as corroborated by numerical calculations ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? almost all of the previous semianalytic work on jet magnetohydrodynamics ( mhd ) was done in the newtonian limit of nonrelativistic bulk and random speeds . relativistic outflows are , however , observed quite commonly in nature with examples including active galactic nuclei ( agns ) , galactic superluminal sources ( often referred to as `` microquasars '' ) , pulsars , and gamma - ray bursts ( grbs) and in many of these cases magnetic fields are again implicated as the main driving and collimation mechanism ( e.g. , * ? ? ? this provides a motivation for generalizing the newtonian self - similar outflow solutions , although it is readily seen that this can not be done in a totally straightforward manner . for one thing , special - relativistic mhd ( unlike the nonrelativistic theory ) involves a characteristic speed ( the speed of light @xmath1 ) , which precludes the incorporation of gravity into the self - similar equations and a simple matching of the outflow solution to a particular ( e.g. , keplerian ) disk rotation law . furthermore , again in contrast with the nonrelativistic formulation , the displacement current and the charge density can not be neglected in the constitutive equations ( which now must also satisfy relativistic covariance ) . despite the aforementioned complications , @xcite and @xcite succeeded in generalizing the `` cold , '' radially self - similar solutions of @xcite to the relativistic regime . their solutions are characterized by the thermal pressure playing a negligible role in the flow acceleration and by the flow being trans - alfvnic : the poloidal speed is less than the poloidal component of the alfvn speed at the base of the flow , and comes to exceed it further up . our aim in this paper is to further generalize these solutions to the `` hot '' relativistic case i.e. , we allow both the bulk _ and _ the random speeds to be relativistic . this is motivated primarily by the desire to apply these solutions to grb outflows , in which thermal driving by an optically thick , hot `` fireball '' composed primarily of radiation and electron - positron pairs could play a role . in fact , most previous models of grb outflows were purely hydrodynamical and included only thermal driving ( see , e.g. , @xcite for a review ) . it has subsequently been realized that energy deposition by annihilating neutrinos , which had been one of the main proposed heating mechanisms , would typically be inefficient ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , and it was , furthermore , argued @xcite that only a small fraction ( @xmath2 ) of the energy deposited in the source could be in thermal form to avoid generating strong photospheric emission in the outflow ( for which there has been no observational evidence ) . for these ( and other ) reasons , it is now believed that magnetic fields play the dominant role in the driving of grb jets ( e.g. , @xcite ) . nevertheless , some thermal energy injection , either by neutrinos or by magnetic energy dissipation , is likely to take place ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , and , as we show in [ soln_a ] , even if it contributes only a small fraction of the initial energy flux in the flow , it can dominate the early phase of the acceleration . there are indications that thermal energy deposition at the source may also contribute to the initial acceleration of relativistic jets in agns ( e.g. , @xcite ; n. vlahakis & a. knigl , in preparation ) . it thus appears that , to fully understand the nature of such jets , it is necessary to model them in terms of a `` hot '' mhd outflow . the ability of large - scale , ordered magnetic fields to guide , collimate , and accelerate relativistic outflows has been previously discussed by various authors ( including , in the grb context , @xcite , @xcite ; @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite ) . these discussions , however , did not include exact solutions from which detailed quantitative estimates could be made . in a previous paper , vlahakis & knigl ( 2001 , hereafter vk01 ) presented a semianalytic self - similar solution of the `` hot '' relativistic mhd equations and applied it to the interpretation of grbs . the full formalism underlying this solution is described in the present paper , where we also analyze its dependence on the relevant physical parameters and compare it with other characteristic solutions of trans - alfvnic flows . this discussion is extended in the companion paper ( vlahakis & knigl 2003 , hereafter paper ii ) , where we focus on super - alfvnic flows . the self - similar solutions that we derive correspond to ordered magnetic field configurations in the ideal - mhd limit . although it is quite conceivable that the fields that drive the flow from a differentially rotating star or disk are at least in part small - scale and disordered , the statistical ( temporal and spatial ) averages of such fields could in principle have a similar effect to that of large - scale , ordered field configurations in providing both acceleration @xcite and collimation @xcite . the applicability of ideal mhd to the acceleration of ultrarelativistic flows has been questioned by @xcite ( @xcite ; see also @xcite ) , who proposed instead a force - free electromagnetic formulation . we note in this connection that a force - free behavior can be recovered from the relativistic mhd formulation as a limiting case of negligible particle inertia . furthermore , electromagnetic energy dissipation perhaps the strongest argument against the ideal - mhd modeling framework has been claimed to lead , on its own , to an efficient conversion of poynting flux into a highly relativistic bulk motion ( e.g. , * ? ? ? our ideal - mhd solutions may thus be regarded as a first step toward a more comprehensive theory in which dissipation effects will be taken into account ( and possibly further enhance the effectiveness of the magnetic acceleration process ) . although the formulation presented in this paper is quite general , the main application that we consider is to grb sources . for definiteness , we adopt the `` internal shock '' scenario for the origin of the prompt high - energy emission in grbs ( e.g. , * ? ? ? considerations involving variability time scales ( as interpreted in the context of this picture ) as well as source energetics support the identification of an accretion disk around a newly formed black hole as the source of the grb outflow ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) ; accordingly , we concentrate on modeling jets from accretion disks . however , our solutions should be at least qualitatively applicable also to other source configurations , such as a rapidly spinning neutron star ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) or a rotating , magnetically threaded black hole ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? since grb outflows have a limited duration ( the value of which is plausibly related to the disk accretion time ) , a naive application of a steady - state similarity solution is not warranted . in previous , purely hydrodynamical models of grb outflows , this difficulty was circumvented by applying the so - called `` frozen pulse '' approximation @xcite . in this paper we prove ( [ governing ] ) that this approximation can be generalized to the relativistic mhd regime , but we also demonstrate ( [ timerecovery ] ) how any inherent time dependence can be recovered . the plan of the paper is as follows . in [ mhd ] we present the equations of time - dependent relativistic mhd , simplify them using the frozen - pulse approximation , and discuss what effect each of the various forces acting on the plasma has on the flow acceleration and collimation . in [ r - ss_section ] we describe the @xmath3 self - similar model and in [ results ] we give the results of the numerical integration of the model equations . we discuss general implications of this work to grb sources and other relativistic jet sources in [ conclusions ] , where we also summarize our conclusions . the stress - energy tensor of relativistic mhd consists of three parts matter ( subscript m ) , radiation ( subscript r ) and electromagnetic fields ( subscript em ) : @xmath4 ( @xmath5 ) . the matter component is given by @xmath6 , where @xmath7 is the total comoving matter energy density , @xmath8 is the particle pressure , @xmath9 is the fluid four - velocity , and @xmath10 is the metric tensor ( assuming a flat spacetime and cartesian space coordinates @xmath11 ) . here @xmath12 is the baryon rest - mass density , @xmath13 is the internal energy density , with @xmath14 denoting the polytropic index ( @xmath15 or @xmath16 in the limit of an ultrarelativistic or a nonrelativistic temperature , respectively ) , @xmath17 is the three - velocity measured in the frame of the central object , and @xmath18 is the lorentz factor . the radiation component is given by @xmath19 , where @xmath20 and @xmath21 are , respectively , the radiation energy density and pressure in the fluid rest frame . radiation forces are typically most important in regions that are sufficiently optically thick that one can take the local radiation field to be nearly isotropic and set @xmath22 . we are most interested in the ultrarelativistic case @xmath23 , in which the matter and radiation can be treated ( under optically thick conditions ) as a single fluid . thus , we henceforth write @xmath24 , @xmath25 , and @xmath26 . introducing the specific ( per baryon mass ) relativistic enthalpy @xmath27 , where @xmath28 and including the contribution of the electric ( @xmath29 ) and magnetic ( @xmath30 ) fields ( measured in the central - object frame ) , the components of the total stress - energy tensor take the form ( @xmath31 ) @xmath32 with @xmath33 , @xmath34 , and @xmath35 representing the energy density , energy flux , and spatial stress contributions , respectively . the electromagnetic field obeys maxwell s equations @xmath36 where @xmath37 is the four - current ( with @xmath38 representing the charge density ) . under the assumption of ideal mhd , the comoving electric field is zero , which implies @xmath39 the baryon mass conservation equation is @xmath40 , or @xmath41 in the absence of a gravitational field or any other external force , the equations of motion are @xmath42 . the momentum conservation equation is given by the @xmath43 components , @xmath44 the entropy conservation equation ( the first law of thermodynamics ) is obtained by setting @xmath45 , @xmath46 which can be rewritten ( using @xmath47 $ ] ) as @xmath48 one can carry out a partial integration of equations ( [ maxwell])([energy ] ) under the assumptions of axisymmetry [ in cylindrical coordinates ( @xmath49 ) , @xmath50 and of a zero azimuthal electric field ( @xmath51 ) if the flow is time - independent ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? we now show that the equations describing a highly relativistic mhd `` pulse '' that could be identified with a grb event may , in fact , be cast in a steady - state form . we start by noting that , with the above assumptions @xmath52 , the poloidal component of faraday s law implies that the poloidal magnetic field is time independent . if the field is anchored in an accretion disk , then the poloidal field near the disk surface would remain quasi steady at least on the timescale of the local radial inflow ( @xmath53 ) . in the case of a grb outflow associated with the emptying up ( by accretion onto a black hole ) of a disk of finite size , the poloidal field may be expected to change significantly only on the timescale of the burst duration . at the end of this time interval , the information that the field has changed starts to propagate with at most the speed of light ( the actual speed of propagation is the fast magnetosonic speed , which is generally @xmath54 in a material medium ) . as we are concerned with highly relativistic outflows , it is reasonable to expect that the poloidal field associated with the outflowing fluid elements that produce the burst will exhibit negligible explicit time dependence ( @xmath55 ) over the duration of the burst . ( note , however , that the azimuthal component of the magnetic field , which is related to the poynting flux , will be time dependent . ) the solenoidal condition on the magnetic field , @xmath56 , implies that there is a poloidal magnetic flux function @xmath57 , defined by @xmath58 , which satisfies @xmath59 where the subscripts @xmath60 and @xmath61 denote the poloidal and azimuthal components , respectively . furthermore , equation ( [ ohm ] ) together with the condition @xmath62 implies @xmath63 , from which it follows that there are functions @xmath64 and @xmath65 ( whose coordinate dependence we discuss below ) such that @xmath66 denoting the arclength along a poloidal fieldline by @xmath67 , we change variables from ( @xmath68 ) to ( @xmath69 ) , with @xmath70 . for any function @xmath71 , we can define the operator @xmath72 we now rewrite the mhd equations using @xmath73 [ mhd - eqs - s ] equation ( [ solenoidal ] ) becomes @xmath74 whereas equation ( [ ohm ] ) gives @xmath75 faraday s law implies @xmath76 and the continuity equation yields @xmath77 where , using equation ( [ v - b ] ) , @xmath78 . turning now to the momentum conservation equation , we employ equation ( [ operators ] ) and the fact that @xmath79 is time independent @xmath80 to write the current density in the form @xmath81 \ .\ ] ] decomposing the vectors using the local cartesian basis @xmath82 we get @xmath83 - e \hat{n } \\ \nonumber & = & -\left(e+ b_{\phi } \right ) \hat{n } + b_{\phi } \left(\hat{n } \cdot { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\ell \right ) \hat{b } \,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] and hence @xmath84\ .\ ] ] the charge density , in turn , can be written as @xmath85\ .\ ] ] substituting these expressions into equation ( [ momentum ] ) , we obtain @xmath86 { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}a + \frac{\left({{\mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\times { \boldsymbol{b } } \right ) \times { \boldsymbol{b } } } { 4 \pi } \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] finally , the entropy conservation equation transforms into @xmath87 for a highly relativistic poloidal motion , when @xmath88 , one can simplify the equations by noting the following : @xmath89 1 ) due to lorentz contraction , the observed width of the outflow is @xmath90 times smaller than its comoving width , @xmath91 . as @xmath92 and @xmath93 , one gets @xmath94 . thus , all terms in equations ( [ mhd - eqs - s ] ) containing @xmath95 are negligible . @xmath89 2 ) the term @xmath96 in equation ( [ continuity - s ] ) is of the order of @xmath97 and is thus negligible in comparison with the first term on the left - hand side of this equation . the arguments above were originally given in the context of a purely hydrodynamic ( hd ) flow by @xcite . @xmath89 3 ) using @xmath98 , @xmath99 , and equations ( [ v - b ] ) and ( [ e_a ] ) , we infer @xmath100 , which remains @xmath101 throughout the flow in view of the scaling @xmath102 ( see [ validity ] ) . thus , all terms in equation ( [ momentum - s ] ) that contain @xmath103 ( i.e. , the first two terms on the right - hand side ) are a factor @xmath104 smaller than the last term on the right - hand side and can be neglected . the same is true in equation ( [ omega_a ] ) , which implies @xmath105 \sim \gamma \partial ( \omega / \gamma^2 ) \ll \omega$ ] . @xmath89 4 ) the pressure - gradient force in the momentum conservation equation can also be neglected . it is much smaller than the lorentz force in the transfield direction , consistent with the fact that the field is everywhere close to being force - free in that direction ( especially so in the region near the origin , where thermal effects are most important ) . along the field , there is a force that is @xmath106 times larger ( namely , the inertial force component associated with the @xmath107 term ) , as in the purely hd case examined in @xcite . in general , the pressure force is important up to the slow magnetosonic point , where , for highly relativistic temperatures , @xmath108 , and its contribution is negligible in the highly relativistic regime . one can therefore replace the term @xmath109 by @xmath110 or even completely neglect the pressure - gradient force in the momentum equation without introducing a significant error . with the above approximations , all the @xmath111 terms in the continuity , momentum , and entropy equations can be eliminated , and the conservation equations simplify to a steady - state form . although the label @xmath112 remains attached to the @xmath113 operator , it now serves only to identify a given outflowing shell ( or pulse ) . the motion remains effectively time independent and can be described as a frozen pulse whose internal profile is specified through the variable @xmath112 . as we noted in [ introduction ] , the frozen - pulse approximation was first applied to relativistic hd outflows in grb sources by @xcite ( @xcite ; see also @xcite ) . we have now shown that this approximation can be extended to relativistic mhd flows . in the remainder of this paper we pursue this effectively steady - state formulation , but we return in [ timerecovery ] to consider time - dependent effects in grb outflows . the full set of effectively steady - steady equations can be partially integrated to yield several field - line constants : [ integrals - s ] \a ) equations ( [ v - b ] ) and ( [ omega_a ] ) yield the field angular velocity , which equals the matter angular velocity at the footpoint of the fieldline at the midplane of the disk , @xmath114 \b ) the continuity equation ( [ continuity - s ] ) and equation ( [ v - b ] ) imply that the mass - to - magnetic flux ratio has the form @xmath115 \c ) the @xmath116 component of the momentum equation ( [ momentum - s ] ) yields the total ( kinetic + magnetic ) specific angular momentum , @xmath117 \d ) dotting @xmath118 into the momentum equation ( [ momentum - s ] ) gives the total energy - to - mass flux ratio @xmath119 , where @xmath120 \e ) the entropy equation ( [ energy - s ] ) gives the adiabat @xmath121 equation ( [ polytropic ] ) is the usual polytropic relation between density and pressure , but in the current application the polytropic index is only allowed to take the values @xmath122 ( if the temperatures are relativistic , in which case matter and radiation are treated as a single fluid ) and @xmath16 ( if the gas is `` cold , '' in which case radiation forces can be neglected ) . other than 4/3 or 5/3 would imply a nonadiabatic evolution and hence require the incorporation of heating / cooling terms into the entropy and momentum equations . ] two integrals remain to be performed , involving the bernoulli and transfield equations . there are correspondingly two unknown functions , which we choose to be the cylindrical radius of the fieldline in units of the `` light cylinder '' radius , @xmath123 and the `` alfvnic '' mach number ( see * ? ? ? * ) @xmath124 we define the alfvn lever arm by @xmath125 [ and correspondingly @xmath126 and use it to scale the cylindrical radius of the fieldline by introducing @xmath127 to obtain nondimensional variables , we adopt a reference length @xmath128 and a reference magnetic field @xmath129 and define @xmath130 the expressions for the physical quantities in terms of the defined variables and the explicit expressions for the bernoulli and transfield equations are given in appendix [ rmhdeqs ] . except for the @xmath112 label , which serves to identify a given shell ( or pulse ) , these equations are precisely those of steady - state , relativistic mhd . solving these equations requires the specification of seven constraints , of which four are associated with boundary conditions at the source and three are determined by the regularity requirement at the singular points ( the modified - slow , alfvn , and modified - fast points ; see @xcite ) . the momentum equation ( [ momentum ] ) can be written as the sum of the following force densities ( for simplicity we use hereafter the term force ) @xmath131 where @xmath132 the `` gamma '' force @xmath133 further decomposes into two terms : @xmath134 , with @xmath135 the poloidal part of the @xmath136 force is @xmath137 where @xmath138 is the angle between the poloidal magnetic field and the disk ( @xmath139 ) , and the derivative @xmath140 \partial / \partial \theta ) $ ] is taken keeping @xmath141 ( and @xmath112 ) constant . the radius of curvature of a poloidal fieldline is @xmath142 . the projection of equation ( [ momentum - f ] ) along the poloidal flow is @xmath143 the terms on the right - hand side of equation ( [ momentum - v_p ] ) are recognized as @xmath144 , @xmath145 , @xmath146 , @xmath147 , and @xmath148 respectively , where a subscript @xmath149 denotes the component of a vector along the poloidal fieldline . the first term on the left - hand side of equation ( [ momentum - v_p ] ) is @xmath150 , whereas the second term is @xmath151 ( note that @xmath152 ) . the magnetic force component @xmath153 decomposes into the azimuthal magnetic pressure gradient @xmath154 and the magnetic tension @xmath155 . these two parts cancel each other when @xmath156 ; if @xmath157 decreases faster than @xmath158 then the gradient of the azimuthal magnetic pressure exceeds the magnetic tension , resulting in a positive @xmath153 . in the nonrelativistic regime ( @xmath159 , @xmath160 ) , the pressure force @xmath147 dominates up to the slow magnetosonic point , but the bulk of the acceleration is either magnetocentrifugal corresponding to the @xmath146 term , which can be interpreted in the `` bead on a wire '' picture ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) and @xmath161 ( with @xmath162 ) near the base of the flow , implying that the azimuthal field satisfies @xmath163 and hence that the @xmath153 term is negligible and that a near - corotation ( @xmath164 ) holds . the small value of @xmath165 in turn implies a large density and hence a measurable thermal pressure , resulting in a nonnegligible pressure force at the base . ] or a consequence of the magnetic pressure - gradient force @xmath153 ( which near the surface of the disk can be interpreted in the `` uncoiling spring '' picture ; e.g. , @xcite ) . in the northern hemisphere ( and parallel to @xmath166 in the southern hemisphere ) , and a corresponding outward - directed magnetic pressure gradient @xmath167 . ] the magnetic force generally becomes important also in flows where the centrifugal acceleration initially dominates : in this case the inertia of the centrifugally accelerated gas amplifies the @xmath168 component , and eventually ( beyond the alfvn point ) @xmath153 becomes the main driving force . this force continues to accelerate the flow beyond the classical fast - magnetosonic point ( which separates the elliptic and hyperbolic regimes of the mhd partial differential equations ) in the central object s frame can exist ( i.e. , eq . [ [ waves_fast ] ] with @xmath169 is satisfied ) . the classical fast - magnetosonic point is equivalently defined by the condition that the poloidal proper speed equals the comoving proper phase speed of a fast - magnetosonic wave whose wavevector is parallel to @xmath170 ( see eq . [ [ theorem ] ] ) . ] and all the way to the modified fast - magnetosonic singular point ( see * ? ? ? the modified ( and _ not _ the classical ) fast - magnetosonic surface has the property that it is a singular surface for the steady mhd equations when one solves simultaneously the bernoulli and transfield equations ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) . only when the magnetic field geometry is given ( and one solves only the bernoulli equation but not the transfield one ) does the singular surface correspond to the classical fast - magnetosonic point . the modified fast - magnetosonic surface coincides with the limiting characteristic , the `` event horizon '' for the propagation of fast - magnetosonic waves , since only beyond this surface all the points inside a fast mach cone have larger fast mach numbers than at the origin of the cone . at smaller distances , for a part of a given cone , the converse is true : the opening angle of the fast mach cone becomes progressively larger as one advances inside that part of the cone ; consequently , a small disturbance in the super - fast regime can affect the entire flow . the situation is similar to that of light propagating close to a kerr black hole , where the ergosphere ( which corresponds to the classical fast - magnetosonic surface ) marks the boundary between the elliptic and hyperbolic regimes , and where the singular event horizon ( which corresponds to the modified fast - magnetosonic surface ) is located within the hyperbolic regime : only for a spherically symmetric ( schwarzschild ) black hole are the ergosphere and event horizon equivalent in direct analogy with spherically symmetric flows , in which the classical and modified fast - magnetosonic points coincide ( see * ? ? ? * ) . in the case where the outflow attains a highly relativistic speed , the centrifugal acceleration can not play an important role . this is because the nonnegligible @xmath166 that would be required in this case would constrain the maximum value of the poloidal speed : @xmath171 . therefore , in equation ( [ momentum - v_p ] ) , @xmath172 ( and also @xmath173 ) . the @xmath147 force can be neglected since @xmath174 . the two remaining terms are @xmath145 ( a force with a relativistic origin ) and @xmath175 . the expressions for these terms in equation ( [ momentum - v_p ] ) ( or , equivalently , eq . [ [ int - mu ] ] for the total energy - to - mass flux ratio ) indicate that the bulk lorentz factor can increase in response to the decline in either the enthalpy - to - rest - mass ratio @xmath176 ( the thermal acceleration case ) or the poynting - to - mass flux ratio @xmath177 ( the magnetic acceleration case ) along the flow . when the temperature is relativistic , the initial acceleration is dominated by the temperature force , but after @xmath176 drops to @xmath178 the magnetic force takes over : this is the likely situation in grb outflows ( see vk01 and [ soln_a ] ) . when the outflow speed is only mildly relativistic , the magnetocentrifugal force may be important during the initial acceleration phase , especially if the temperatures are nonrelativistic ; this is the situation envisioned in the `` cold '' relativistic - mhd solutions of @xcite . it is , however , also conceivable that the magnetic pressure - gradient force dominates from the start , as might be the case if the azimuthal field component at the disk surface is large enough ; this is the picture outlined in the presentation of the relativistic solutions derived by @xcite ( @xcite ; see also paper ii ) . we can obtain an expression for @xmath179 as follows . by eliminating @xmath180 between equations ( [ int - l ] ) and ( [ int - mu ] ) , we obtain a relation between @xmath181 and @xmath182 : @xmath183 whose divergence along the flow implies @xmath184 employing the relations for @xmath153 , @xmath146 ( see eq . [ [ momentum - v_p ] ] ) , and equations ( [ a1])([rho_p ] ) , we obtain @xmath185 the first term on the right - hand side of equation ( [ f_c - f_b ] ) can give rise to either acceleration ( when @xmath166 decreases along the flowline ) or deceleration ( when @xmath166 increases , as in the corotation regime at the base of the outflow ) . this term , together with @xmath144 , can lead to a situation in which @xmath186 increases ( resp . , decreases ) and @xmath166 decreases ( resp . , increases ) while the lorentz factor remains roughly constant . the second term on the right - hand side of equation ( [ f_c - f_b ] ) , which is proportional to @xmath175 , demonstrates that the centrifugal force also has a magnetic component and accounts for the poynting - to - kinetic energy transfer that underlies the magnetocentrifugal acceleration process ( see also @xcite for a related discussion ) . the form of this term makes it clear why the centrifugal force exceeds the magnetic force during the initial stage of the acceleration , when the flow is still nonrelativistic ( @xmath187 , @xmath188 , with @xmath189 , @xmath190 ) . the conclusion from the above analysis is that , even though centrifugal and thermal effects could dominate initially , the magnetic force eventually takes over and is responsible for the bulk of the acceleration to high terminal speeds . @xcite described the efficient conversion of poynting - to - kinetic energy fluxes in relativistic mhd outflows in terms of a `` magnetic nozzle '' ( see also @xcite ) . the preceding discussion makes it clear that , in essence , this mechanism represents the ability of a collimated hydromagnetic outflow to continue to undergo magnetic acceleration all the way up to the modified fast - magnetosonic point ( which could lie well beyond the classical fast point ) . when interpreted in these terms , it is evident that this effect is not inherently relativistic this conclusion has , in fact , been verified explicitly in the case of the nonrelativistic self - similar solutions constructed by @xcite . the projection of equation ( [ momentum - f ] ) in the direction perpendicular to the poloidal flow is given by equation ( [ forces - perp ] ) . the two largest terms are the magnetic and electric force components , which almost cancel each other . the magnetic force in the meridional plane has two parts : @xmath191 and @xmath192 . the first term ( which usually dominates ) has components in both the flow ( along @xmath193 ) and the transfield ( along @xmath194 ) directions . the @xmath195 component @xmath196 contributes to the acceleration when @xmath197 , where the subscript @xmath198 denotes the vector component along @xmath199 . ( if a thermally dominated acceleration regime exists near the base of the flow , it is in principle possible to have @xmath200 there , corresponding to an enthalpy - to - poynting energy transfer mediated by the magnetic force ; see paper ii . ) the @xmath199 component @xmath201 acts to collimate or decollimate the flow depending on whether the outflow is , respectively , in the current - carrying ( @xmath202 ) or the return - current ( @xmath203 ) regime ( see fig . [ fig1 ] ) . the second term in the decomposition of the meridional magnetic force is related to the curvature radius @xmath204 , @xmath205 , and is directed along @xmath206 for @xmath207 . the electric field always points in the @xmath199 direction , but the electric force @xmath208 could lie along either @xmath209 or @xmath210 , depending on the sign of the charge density @xmath38 . by employing the curvature radius @xmath204 , one can write @xmath211 . when @xmath212 ( a collimating flow ) , the effect of the curvature term in the expression for the electric force is to oppose collimation , but it is possible for the other term in this expression to dominate , leading to @xmath213 . for highly relativistic motion ( @xmath214 ) , @xmath215 , and the electric force has the sign of @xmath216 . in this case @xmath217 acts to decollimate the flow in the current - carrying regime and to collimate it in the return - current regime ( see fig . [ fig1 ] ) . for comparison , note that , when the motion is nonrelativistic ( @xmath187 ) , @xmath217 is negligible relative to @xmath218 . in this case , a flow in the current - carrying regime is easily collimated ( with @xmath219 balancing the inertial force @xmath220 , resulting in a nonnegligible value of @xmath204 ) . in the return - current regime , collimation ( resp . , decollimation ) is produced if @xmath221 ( resp . , @xmath222 ) ; see @xcite . to obtain semianalytic solutions of the highly nonlinear system of equations ( [ bernoulli ] ) and ( [ transfield ] ) , it is necessary to make additional assumptions : in particular , we look for a way to effect a separation of variables . the most complicated expression is the one for @xmath223 ( eq . [ [ a1 ] ] ) . in view of the importance of the azimuthal field component , which plays a crucial and varied role as part of the magnetic pressure - gradient , magnetic tension , and centrifugal acceleration terms in the momentum equation , the only realistic possibility of deriving exact analytic solutions is to assume that the @xmath224 , @xmath225 , and @xmath226 surfaces coincide , i.e. , that @xmath227 @xcite . we aim to find appropriate forms for the functions of @xmath141 such that the expressions ( [ bernoulli ] ) and ( [ transfield ] ) become ordinary differential equations ( odes ) . from an inspection of the bernoulli equation ( [ bernoulli ] ) we conclude that , in order to separate the variables @xmath228 and @xmath141 and get a _ single _ equation that only has a @xmath228 dependence , it is necessary to assume that the @xmath229 term is a product of a function of @xmath141 times a function of @xmath228 . as @xmath141 is a function of @xmath230 ( see eq . [ [ g ] ] ) , there must exist functions @xmath231 such that @xmath232 ^ 2 = { \cal h}_1 \left(\frac{\varpi } { g}\right ) \ { \cal h}_2 ( g)\,.\ ] ] there always exist the trivial possibilities @xmath233 in spherical coordinates @xmath234 [ @xmath235 when the field is radial ] , and @xmath236 ( @xmath237 for a cylindrical field ) , which are not of interest here . after some algebra one can prove that the only nontrivial case is to have @xmath238 , i.e. , @xmath239 . it thus appears that , to obtain an analytic adiabatic solution , it is necessary to assume @xmath3 self - similarity . the remaining assumptions for constructing an @xmath3 self - similar solution are that the cylindrical distance ( in units of the alfvnic lever arm ) , the poloidal alfvnic mach number , and the relativistic specific enthalpy are also functions of @xmath240 only : @xmath241 , @xmath242 , @xmath243 ( with the result for @xmath176 following from the nonlinearity of the expression for @xmath165 ; see eq . [ [ x - m ] ] ) . following the algorithm described in @xcite , we change variables from ( @xmath244 ) to ( @xmath245 ) ( see eq . [ [ alpha ] ] ) and obtain the forms of the integrals under the assumption of separability in @xmath246 and @xmath240 . the results are given in equation ( [ integrals ] ) . , and ignoring gravity , so it is possible to assume a polytropic equation of state ) . ] among the five unknown functions of @xmath240 [ @xmath247 , @xmath248 , @xmath249 , @xmath250 , and @xmath251 dependence ; see [ timerecovery ] . ] there are three algebraic equations ( eqs . [ [ x - rss ] ] , [ [ m - rss ] ] , and [ [ bernoulli - rss ] ] ) and two first - order odes ( eqs . [ [ g - rss ] ] and [ [ transfield - rss ] ] ) . after solving for these functions , the physical quantities can be recovered using [ quantities - rss ] @xmath252 @xmath253 @xmath254 @xmath255 @xmath256 where @xmath257 is the unit vector along the poloidal fieldline , @xmath258 ( already defined in [ governing ] ) is the unit vector in the transfield direction in the meridional plane ( toward the axis of rotation ) , and @xmath259 is the opening half - angle of the outflow ( the angle between the poloidal fieldline and the axis of rotation ) . the @xmath3 dependence of all the physical quantities can be inferred from the expressions ( [ quantities - rss ] ) on the basis of the known @xmath3 dependence of @xmath246 ( @xmath260 ; see eq . [ [ alpha ] ] ) . this is a general characteristic of @xmath3 self - similar models . the parameters of the model are @xmath261 and @xmath14 ( @xmath15 in this study ) , whereas the `` constants '' @xmath262 , @xmath263 , @xmath264 , @xmath265 , and @xmath266 together with two `` initial '' conditions ( corresponding to the two first - order odes ) are related to seven boundary conditions , as we prove in appendix [ appendixrss ] . the @xmath3 self - similar character of the poloidal field - line shape is shown in figure [ fig2 ] . the model described above is the generalization to a `` hot '' ( @xmath267 ) gas of the only known exact semianalytic solution of the relativistic mhd equations , the `` cold '' @xmath3 self - similar wind solution found independently by @xcite and @xcite . ( the force - free model of @xcite can be regarded as a special case of the latter solutions , corresponding to @xmath268 and @xmath269 . ) self - similarity was first employed by @xcite , who examined purely hd flows , but it has become well - known only after @xcite used it to construct a nonrelativistic mhd disk - wind model . the latter work has subsequently been generalized by many authors ( see @xcite and references therein ) . ] it is obvious from equations ( [ quantities - rss ] ) that the alfvn point , where @xmath270 , is singular . at this point @xmath271 in fact , as @xmath63 , this relation holds not only for the @xmath240-components of ( @xmath272 ) , but for components in any direction in the meridional plane . thus , on the alfvn surface , static alfvn waves with wavevector in any direction in the meridional plane ( in the central object s frame ) can exist ( i.e. , eq . [ [ waves_alfven ] ] with @xmath273 and @xmath274 is satisfied ) . ] ) . ] in order for the solution to pass through the alfvn singular point , the alfvn regularity condition ( [ alfv2 ] ) must be satisfied . the latter determines the slope of the `` alfvnic '' mach number at the alfvn point , @xmath275 , which is related to the alfvnic value of the magnetization function @xmath276 ( see appendix [ appendixrss ] ) . it is seen from equation ( [ alfven - dispersion ] ) that the alfvn point is always located inside the light surface @xmath277 . note , however , that if @xmath278 ( corresponding to the force - free limit , @xmath279 ) , the alfvn and light surfaces almost coincide . it is straightforward to obtain an expression for @xmath280 as a function of @xmath281 using the derivative of the bernoulli equation ( [ bernoulli - rss ] ) . after substituting in the transfield equation ( [ transfield - rss ] ) , the latter takes the form @xmath282 , where the denominator can be written as @xmath283 with @xmath284 being the magnetic field amplitude and with the square of the proper sound speed given by @xmath285 singular points appear wherever @xmath286 ; these are the modified slow and fast - magnetosonic singular points . they correspond to points where static slow / fast - magnetosonic waves with wavevectors along @xmath287 in the central object s frame can exist ( i.e. , eq . [ [ waves_fast ] ] with @xmath288 is satisfied ) . is equal to the comoving proper phase speed of a slow / fast - magnetosonic wave propagating along @xmath287 ( see eq . [ [ theorem ] ] ) . ] the modified singular surfaces , which correspond to the `` limiting characteristics '' of the self - similar flow , have previously been considered in connection with the nonrelativistic solutions ( e.g. , @xcite ) . in order for the solution to pass through a singular point where @xmath286 , @xmath289 must simultaneously hold ( yielding the respective regularity condition ) . when solving the steady , axisymmetric , ideal mhd equations under the assumption that the azimuthal electric field ( as measured in the central object s frame ) vanishes ( @xmath51 ) , seven integrations are required , corresponding to seven unknowns : the gas density and pressure , the three components of the velocity , and two functions related to the magnetic field ( e.g. , @xmath141 and @xmath223 ) . correspondingly , seven boundary conditions determine a unique solution . five of them are the integrals @xmath64 , @xmath65 , @xmath290 , @xmath291 , and @xmath292 , which , as discussed in [ governing ] , are conserved quantities along the meridional fieldlines . the other two correspond to `` initial conditions '' on the functions @xmath293 and @xmath165 , which are obtained by integrating equations ( [ bernoulli ] ) and ( [ transfield ] ) . in a physically viable solution , the flow starts with a sub slow - magnetosonic velocity and must satisfy the causality principle : any disturbance in the asymptotic regime can not influence the solution near the origin through magnetosonic or alfvn waves . since the flow starts with a small velocity , it must cross three singular surfaces : the modified slow - magnetosonic , the alfvn , and the modified fast - magnetosonic . , the latter surface represents the `` event horizon '' for the propagation of the fastest waves . the alfvn surface plays a similar role for the alfvn waves , but the slow - magnetosonic singular surface is not the `` event horizon '' for the propagation of slow - magnetosonic waves ; it is just the limiting characteristic in the sub - slow hyperbolic regime ( see @xcite ) . ] the related three regularity conditions are effectively three boundary conditions that must be satisfied in order for the solution to pass smoothly through the singular points . implementing this procedure is a highly nonlinear task , since the positions of the singular points are not known a priori and must be obtained simultaneously with the solution . all in all , only four boundary conditions remain free and can be specified ( e.g. , on a surface near the origin of the flow ) . in the @xmath3 self - similar model that we examine , in which we end up integrating odes in the variable @xmath240 , it is convenient to choose as the initial surface a cone @xmath294 ( where here and in what follows , a subscript @xmath295 denotes an initial value ) . one can start the integration by specifying seven initial conditions ( i.e. , seven functions of @xmath3 ) on this cone ( where @xmath3 is the arclength along the conical surface ; it should not to be confused with the distance from the central object , which is given by @xmath296^{1/2}$ ] see fig . [ fig2 ] ) . for example , one can specify @xmath297 and @xmath298 such that @xmath299 , @xmath300 , @xmath301 , @xmath302 , @xmath303 , @xmath304 , and @xmath305 ( with the @xmath306 being in general functions of @xmath112 ) . note that , in the framework of this self - similar model , the specified functions of @xmath3 must be consistent with equations ( [ quantities - rss ] ) ; if they are not , the given scalings will not be reproduced on subsequent ( @xmath307 ) cones . by inverting the system of equations ( [ quantities - rss ] ) , one can obtain @xmath308 , @xmath309 , @xmath310 , @xmath311 , @xmath312 , @xmath313 , and @xmath314 ( see eqs . [ [ invert ] ] ) . from eq . [ [ bernoulli - rss ] ] and use it in place of @xmath313 as a fieldline constant . ] three of these parameters are adjusted to satisfy the regularity conditions at the three singular points . we recall in this connection that @xmath14 and @xmath261 are regarded in our formulation as model parameters ( see [ construction ] ) , and we note that @xmath313 , @xmath308 , @xmath309 , and @xmath310 correspond to the fieldline constants @xmath291 , @xmath308 , @xmath64 , and @xmath292 , respectively . next we describe our numerical approach . we have found it most convenient to start the integration from the alfvn point , since this makes it easier to satisfy the alfvn regularity condition . we choose a small angular interval @xmath315 and specify the model parameters @xmath297 together with the following six parameters : @xmath316 , @xmath317 , @xmath308 , @xmath309 , @xmath310 and @xmath314 . ( the latter parameter does not appear in the system of equations [ [ theta - eqs ] ] , but it affects the magnitudes of the electromagnetic field , density , and pressure through eqs . [ [ quantities - rss ] ] . ) the seventh parameter is @xmath318 , which is given from the alfvn regularity condition ( see appendix [ appendixrss ] ) . we start the integration from @xmath319 , setting @xmath320 , @xmath321 , and @xmath322 . using the upper ( lower ) signs , we integrate upstream ( downstream ) from the alfvn point . before the first step , we evaluate the parameter @xmath291 ( which is used along the integration path to yield @xmath138 ) from equation ( [ bernoulli - rss ] ) . whenever the solution hits a singular point , we adjust one of the above six parameters until a smooth crossing is achieved . in our model we have ignored gravity , and consequently we expect the flow to be nonsteady in the sub slow - magnetosonic regime . we therefore do not attempt to obtain steady trans slow - magnetosonic solutions , and thus we do not continue the integration upstream of the slow - magnetosonic point . this does not , however , affect our ability to study magnetic effects , as these only become important downstream of this singular point . the polytropic index @xmath14 controls the thermodynamics of the flow . for adiabatic flow problems such as the one considered in this paper , @xmath23 or @xmath16 depending on whether the temperature is relativistic or not . the exponent @xmath261 controls the current distribution . the poloidal current lines are @xmath324 , where , by equation ( [ b - rss ] ) , @xmath325 thus , for @xmath326 , the current @xmath327 is an increasing function of @xmath246 near the base of a trans - alfvnic flow ( where @xmath328 ) , corresponding to the current - carrying regime ( see the left fieldline in fig . [ fig1 ] ) . the larger the value of @xmath329 , the stronger the magnetic pinching force that collimates the flow , and hence the faster the collimation . the case @xmath330 corresponds to the return - current regime ( represented by the right fieldline in fig . [ fig1 ] ) , whereas @xmath331 corresponds to radial meridional current lines . in this paper ( as well as in paper ii ) we concentrate on the case @xmath326 , which should provide a good representation of the conditions near the axis of highly collimated flows such as grb jets . however , in view of the inherent simplifications of the self - similar formulation , this choice is not unique . for comparison , we present an @xmath330 solution in [ soln_d ] , and we also employ a solution of this type in a forthcoming publication ( n. vlahakis & a. knigl , in preparation ) in which we model relativistic agn outflows . a realistic global solution would encompass both the current - carrying and return - current regimes , as sketched in figure [ fig1 ] . this situation might be mimicked with the help of two , properly joined , self - similar models : one ( with @xmath326 ) that applies near the axis , and the other ( with @xmath330 ) that applies further out ( at larger cylindrical distances ) . the parameter @xmath323 ( the @xmath332 coordinate of the disk in the given system of coordinates ; see fig . 2 ) affects only the boundary conditions on the disk . for example , @xmath323 can be used to mimic a keplerian rotation law . ( recall from [ introduction ] that , in the relativistic case considered here , one can not naturally incorporate a keplerian rotation law as in the nonrelativistic @xmath3 self - similar solutions . ) in our model , @xmath333 ; thus , for @xmath334 , @xmath335 along the conical surface of the disk . however , for @xmath336 , points on the surface of the disk at different cylindrical distances @xmath337 correspond to different values of @xmath338 ( see fig . [ fig2 ] ) , and @xmath65 decreases faster than @xmath339 ( with the rate depending on how fast the function @xmath340 decreases along the surface of the disk ) . the solutions we present in this section are motivated by the grb outflow scenario outlined in [ introduction ] . we approximate the outflow from a disk around a stellar - mass black hole as a pair of `` pancakes '' ( see , e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) that move in opposite directions away from the disk surfaces . the flow originates from the inner part of the disk , which extends from the last stable orbit around the black hole at @xmath341 to an outer radius @xmath342 , which for definiteness we choose to be @xmath343 . for simplicity we set @xmath334 , so ( see eq . [ [ alpha ] ] ) @xmath344 . we take into account the baryonic matter , the electron - positron / photon fluid , and the large - scale electromagnetic field . as noted in [ roles ] , we focus on solutions in the current - carrying regime ( @xmath326 ) . for this choice of @xmath261 , equation ( [ current ] ) implies that the current vanishes smoothly as the axis ( @xmath345 ) is approached . a general property of our solutions is that the flow reaches an asymptotic cylindrical region where the acceleration terminates ( see [ soln_a ] ) . since we seek to maximize the acceleration efficiency , we consider flows that do not collimate too fast ( see [ sectioncollimation ] ) , and hence we focus on the smallest possible values of @xmath261 . we therefore choose @xmath346 . near the origin , the thermal energy associated with the radiation and @xmath347 pairs is nonnegligible ; the optical depth is then large enough to ensure local thermodynamic equilibrium . we therefore assume that the gas ( consisting of baryons with their neutralizing electrons as well as photons and pairs ) evolves adiabatically . the polytropic index is fixed at @xmath23 , corresponding to relativistic temperatures for the matter and to a blackbody distribution for the radiation . using the stephan - boltzmann constant @xmath348 ( where @xmath349 is the temperature ) and equations ( [ p - rss ] ) and ( [ m - rss ] ) , the temperature in units of the electron rest energy is @xmath350 or , equivalently , @xmath351 the matter - to - radiation pressure ratio @xmath352 is constant in the large - temperature limit @xmath353 , where , given that the pair number density greatly exceeds the baryon number density , the pair distribution may be approximated by a maxwellian with zero chemical potential . in this case @xmath354 ( a value very close to the more accurate @xmath355 that characterizes a fermi distribution ) . in the large - temperature limit the pair number density has the @xmath23 polytropic scaling ( @xmath356 ) , but at @xmath357 it decreases exponentially , resulting in @xmath358 . our polytropic model captures both limits but not the intermediate temperatures . which of the two approximations ( @xmath359 or @xmath360 ) is more accurate depends on the initial temperature @xmath361 . for @xmath362 we choose @xmath359 , which yields the correct pressure temperature relation during the initial stage of the flow , when thermal effects are important . this choice introduces an error ( leading to an underestimate of the lorenz factor ) in regions where @xmath363 but the radiation energy is nonnegligible in comparison with the baryon rest energy . however , because of the weak ( a power of 1/4 ) dependence of @xmath364 on @xmath365 in equation ( [ theta ] ) , this error remains small . we note in this connection that we also neglect the pair rest - energy density , since it is much smaller than the matter pressure in the @xmath366 regime where the pair contribution is maximized . the mass - loss rate in the outflow is @xmath367 , or , @xmath368 if @xmath369 is the burst duration , then @xmath370 is the total baryon mass ejected . the total energy is @xmath371 , and initially it resides predominantly in the electromagnetic field ; the initial thermal energy is approximately @xmath372 . , @xmath373 , and ( for the initial enthalpy - to - kinetic - energy ratio ) @xmath374 . ] in vk01 we considered two lower limits on the baryon loading , corresponding , respectively , to the requirements ( 1 ) that the flow be optically thick in the region where the pair number density drops below that of the baryons and ( 2 ) that the flow be matter - dominated when it becomes optically thin . we also obtained an upper limit on @xmath12 from the requirement that the flow be optically thin in the internal grb - shock regime . in the solutions presented in this paper we evaluate the optical depths more accurately . specifically , consider two neighboring fieldlines labeled by @xmath141 and @xmath375 . along a direction @xmath376 that makes an angle @xmath377 to the flow velocity , the optical depth is @xcite @xmath378 where @xmath379 is the electron / positron number density , @xmath380 is the thomson cross section , and @xmath381 is the distance between the fieldlines . the optical depth is minimized when @xmath382 , for which @xmath383 ( corresponding to photons moving perpendicular to the flow direction in the comoving frame ) . starting from a point on the inner fieldline , we chart the photon trajectory by using @xmath382 and @xmath383 until the outer fieldline is reached , and use this information to evaluate the optical depth . we now present the results of the numerical integration for four representative solutions ( labeled @xmath384 , @xmath385 , @xmath1 , and @xmath386 ) , for which the parameters are given in table [ table1 ] . the most important physical quantities are plotted in figure [ fig3 ] , in which each column corresponds to a given solution . the properties of these solutions are described in detail in the following subsections . lccccccccccc solution & @xmath261 & @xmath387 & @xmath309 & @xmath310 & @xmath291 & @xmath314(cgs ) & @xmath388 & @xmath389 & @xmath318 & @xmath276 & @xmath128(@xmath390 cm ) + @xmath391 & @xmath392 & @xmath393 & @xmath394 & @xmath395 & @xmath396 & @xmath397 & @xmath398 & @xmath399 & @xmath400 & @xmath401 & @xmath402 + @xmath385 & @xmath392 & @xmath403 & @xmath394 & @xmath360 & @xmath404 & @xmath405 & @xmath398 & @xmath399 & @xmath406 & @xmath407 & @xmath402 + @xmath1 & @xmath392 & @xmath408 & @xmath409 & @xmath410 & @xmath411 & @xmath412 & @xmath398 & @xmath413 & @xmath414 & @xmath415 & @xmath416 + @xmath386 & @xmath417 & @xmath418 & @xmath419 & @xmath420 & @xmath421 & @xmath422 & @xmath423 & @xmath424 & @xmath425 & @xmath426 & @xmath402 + + + this solution represents our fiducial model of a trans - alfvnic grb outflow in which the poynting flux exceeds the enthalpy flux at the origin ( @xmath427 ) . the flow starts from the disk with a nonrelativistic velocity and in a short distance crosses the slow magnetosonic point ( where @xmath428 ) . the acceleration in this regime is due to the pressure gradient force ( the centrifugal acceleration is negligible for @xmath429 ) . the slow magnetosonic point arises from the interplay between the vertical gravitational and pressure - gradient forces . as we neglect gravity , we start the integration slightly above that slow point ( @xmath430 , see fig . [ fig3]a2 ) . in this initial sub - alfvnic regime , @xmath431 . equation ( [ a2 ] ) for the lorentz factor gives @xmath432 thus , a poynting - dominated flow ( @xmath427 ) is always close to being force - free ( @xmath433 ) , and the initial enthalpy - to - poynting flux ratio satisfies @xmath434 ( @xmath435 in the displayed solution ) . as the flow moves downstream it crosses the alfvn singular point . we solve numerically for the slope @xmath318 of the alfvnic mach number that satisfies the alfvn regularity condition ( see [ alfven - section ] ) . in the super - alfvnic regime there are three possible cases : + 1 . the flow recollimates ( @xmath436 ) and there is a termination point where the entire energy is suddenly transformed into kinetic motion ( corresponding to the solution hitting the modified fast singular surface but not being able to cross it ) ; + 2 . the flow starts to decelerate at some heigh above the disk ; + 3 . the flow becomes asymptotically cylindrical . the last case is the only physically acceptable one and corresponds to a specific value of one of the model parameters . ( for example , for the chosen parameter set @xmath261 , @xmath316 , @xmath318 , @xmath308 , @xmath309 , and @xmath310 , there is a unique value of @xmath291 that corresponds to the cylindrical solution ) . this is the `` magnetic nozzle '' mechanism first described by @xcite and discussed in [ pol_accel ] . when the flow has cylindrical asymptotics , the asymptotic regime @xmath437 is the only possible solution of @xmath438 ( where @xmath439 is given by eq . [ [ d ] ] ) . in this case , the modified fast - magnetosonic singular surface ( the `` event horizon '' for the propagation of fast waves ) corresponds to the asymptotic cylindrical regime ( where all the fast mach cones along each fieldline have the same opening angle ) . as in the `` cold '' solutions derived by @xcite , the critical value of @xmath291 is always close to @xmath440 . figure [ fig3]a1 shows the meridional projections of the innermost and outermost fieldlines on a logarithmic scale . our chosen initial cylindrical distances are @xmath441 cm for the innermost fieldline and @xmath442 cm for the outermost one ; these distances are only slightly larger than those of the footpoints of these fieldlines in the disk . figure [ fig3]a1 also depicts the optical paths of photons that originate at three points on the innermost fieldline ; these were calculated according to the procedure described at the beginning of this section and are plotted as dashed lines labeled 1 , 2 , and 3 . figure [ fig3]a7 shows the corresponding optical depths @xmath443 , @xmath444 , and @xmath445 along these paths as a function of @xmath446 . it is seen that , as one moves downstream ( with the initial point on the innermost fieldline shifting to a larger height @xmath332 above the disk ) , the optical depth gets smaller , and the flow eventually becomes optically thin ( @xmath447 for @xmath448 ) . figure [ fig3]a7 also shows the radial profile of the mass - loss rate . for @xmath448 , @xmath449 , corresponding to a total ejected baryonic mass of @xmath450 for a typical burst duration @xmath451 . the total energy flux along the poloidal flow is @xmath452 ( where @xmath453 is the mass flux ) . the main part of the total energy flux ( at least in the initial phase of the flow ) is the poynting flux ( see eq . [ [ tensor_flux ] ] ) , @xmath454 ( note that this term is positive since @xmath455 . ) the remaining part @xmath456 ( see the energy conservation relation , eq . [ [ int - mu ] ] ) includes the kinetic energy flux ( @xmath457 ) and the enthalpy flux . the total energy loss rate is @xmath458 , and for @xmath459s the total energy injected into the two oppositely directed jets is @xmath460 . figure [ fig3]a2 shows the various energy fluxes in units of @xmath461 ( the mass flux @xmath462 ) as well as the lorentz factor @xmath90 as functions of @xmath337 , the distance from the axis of rotation along the innermost fieldline . we distinguish three different regimes : \1 . + from the initial point ( slightly above the slow point ) up to @xmath463 cm , @xmath464 ( the exact initial values for solution @xmath384 are @xmath465 and @xmath466 . ) the acceleration is primarily thermal : enthalpy is transformed into kinetic energy . in figure [ fig4]a we see that the force @xmath467 ( which measures the increase in @xmath90 ) is equal to the temperature force @xmath145 ( which describes the decrease of @xmath176 ) . the poynting - to - mass flux ratio ( @xmath468 ) is essentially constant , which means that the field is force - free ; it only guides the flow . to a good approximation , @xmath469 and @xmath470 . so long as @xmath471 , equation ( [ theta ] ) gives @xmath472 ; thus , @xmath473 . this is verified in figure [ fig3]a3 , which shows the poloidal magnetic field ( in units of @xmath474 g ) and the baryon rest - mass density ( in units of @xmath475 g @xmath476 ) . it is seen that @xmath477 ( as expected from the polytropic relation @xmath478 ) and @xmath479 ( as expected from the constancy of the mass - to - magnetic flux ratio @xmath480 ) . as the azimuthal velocity is negligible ( for a highly relativistic poloidal motion ) , equation ( [ int - omega ] ) implies @xmath481 , as expected in the force - free regime . in general , @xmath482 , so @xmath483 , consistent with @xmath479 and @xmath484 . + figure [ fig3]a4 shows the angle between the total magnetic field and its azimuthal component ( which , given that @xmath479 and @xmath485 , decreases as @xmath486 ) , the `` causal connection '' opening angle @xmath487 , and the opening half - angle of the outflow @xmath488 ( its initial value is @xmath489 ) . + figure [ fig3]a5 shows the pressures associated with the poloidal , azimuthal , and comoving magnetic field components , as well as the total thermal ( lepton + radiation ) pressure contribution ( @xmath490 dashed lines ; @xmath491 solid lines , respectively ) . in general , @xmath492 . as @xmath340 and @xmath90 are both proportional to @xmath337 , their ratio is a constant , @xmath493 . thus , @xmath494 , as verified by the figure . + figure [ fig3]a6 shows @xmath495 and @xmath496 ( the squares of the `` light cylinder '' radius and the alfvnic mach number , respectively ) as well as the square of the `` classical fast - magnetosonic proper mach number '' @xmath497 , where @xmath498 is the larger solution of the quadratic @xmath499 the point where @xmath277 corresponds to the light surface , which is close to the alfvn surface @xmath500 ( more accurately , the alfvn surface is where @xmath501 ) . + the point @xmath502 is the classical fast - magnetosonic point . it is seen that , up to that point , @xmath503 . this can be understood by noting that , since @xmath504 , the solution of equation ( [ cl_fast ] ) yields @xmath505 . it follows that , so long as @xmath506 ( using @xmath507 ) , @xmath508 . + at the classical fast point ( subscript @xmath509 ) @xmath510 , so equation ( [ a2 ] ) for the lorentz factor gives @xmath511 . if this point is located inside the thermally dominated region ( @xmath512 , as in the depicted solution ) , then , using @xmath513 , one infers @xmath514 . as @xmath515 , it follows that @xmath516 . + from the end of the thermal acceleration zone , where @xmath517 , up to @xmath518 cm , it is seen from figure [ fig3]a2 that the lorentz factor continues to increase as @xmath519 , with @xmath520 a constant @xmath521 . this exponent is in general different for different solutions . we find that for solutions with a given @xmath291 but different @xmath522 , @xmath523 is always less than 1 and decreases with increasing @xmath522 . for larger @xmath522 the magnetic effects are less important , resulting in a weaker collimation of the flow and hence in a larger asymptotic width @xmath524 . since the final lorentz factor is @xmath525 , the exponent @xmath526 should be smaller . centrifugal acceleration can also influence the magnitude of this exponent : for mildly relativistic flows we expect this acceleration to increase the lever arm of the flow , resulting in a lower value of @xmath523 . + the acceleration in this region is due to magnetic effects : poynting energy is transformed into kinetic energy . figure [ fig4]a shows that the force @xmath467 ( which describes the increase in @xmath90 ) is equal to the lorentz force @xmath153 ( which derives from the decrease of @xmath527 ) . the poynting - to - mass flux ratio declines from its initial value @xmath528 as @xmath529 , with @xmath530 , a result verified by figure [ fig3]a2 . however , the deviation from the initial value of @xmath119 is not too strong , so the scalings @xmath479 , @xmath477 , and @xmath531 remain approximately the same as at smaller radii ( see figs . [ fig3]a3 , [ fig3]a4 , and [ fig3]a5 ) . + figure [ fig3]a6 shows that @xmath532 but that @xmath165 increases faster than @xmath340 . as the poynting - to - matter energy flux ratio is @xmath533 / \left[\xi \gamma^2 \rho_0 c^2 v_p\right]= ( \mu - \xi \gamma ) / \xi \gamma = ( x^2 - x_a^2 ) / ( m^2 + 1 - x_a^2 ) \approx x^2 / m^2 $ ] , this is another manifestation of the poynting - to - kinetic flux conversion . + the bernoulli equation simplifies in this region to @xmath534 , which can be used , along with @xmath535 and equation ( [ v - rss ] ) , to obtain the fieldline slope , @xmath536 ( the same result can be found using eq . [ [ bernoulli - rss ] ] . ) so long as @xmath532 , the slope is @xmath537 ( as the critical value for @xmath291 is close to @xmath538 , and @xmath539 ) . thus , the shape of the fieldlines is parabolic , @xmath540 , as figure [ fig3]a1 verifies ( cf . + at the end of the magnetic acceleration region the flow becomes cylindrical : figure [ fig3]a1 shows that the fieldlines tend to a constant @xmath337 , whereas figure [ fig3]a4 indicates that the opening half - angle @xmath541 tends to zero . + figure [ fig4]b shows that , although the electric force almost cancels the magnetic force ( @xmath542 ) , their sum @xmath543 . on the other hand , @xmath544 , or ( using eqs . [ [ fcbot ] ] and [ [ fibot ] ] ) , @xmath545 , which means that the poloidal curvature radius vanishes ( i.e. , the poloidal fieldlines become straight ) a characteristic of cylindrical collimation . ( in the initial acceleration region near the disk it is seen from fig . [ fig4]b that @xmath546 , which implies that the fieldlines curve toward the axis . ) self - similarity does not allow such a transition , other types of self - similar solutions can be constructed in which such a transition takes place and the flow continues to accelerate ( see * ? ? ? * ) . ] + in the cylindrical region , the transfield force - balance equation becomes @xmath547 or , using @xmath548 and equations ( [ quantities - rss ] ) , @xmath549 as the left - hand side of equation ( [ transf_cyl ] ) is small but positive , @xmath550 . using @xmath551 and @xmath552 , we conclude that @xmath553 is invariably @xmath554 ; hence , only a current - carrying jet ( @xmath326 ) can have cylindrical asymptotics . + equation ( [ bernoulli_asympt ] ) with @xmath555 gives the final kinetic - to - poynting flux ratio , @xmath556 , corresponding to @xmath557 . the value of @xmath558 becomes as large as that of @xmath559 ( see fig . [ fig3]a6 ) , so a rough equipartition holds between the kinetic and poynting fluxes : @xmath560 ( see fig . [ fig3]a2 ) . + the implied conversion efficiency of @xmath561 between the total energy ( injected largely in the form of a poynting flux ) and the final kinetic energy of the flow is consistent with the internal shock scenario for grbs . specifically , the asymptotic kinetic energy in each jet is @xmath562 for our fiducial parameters . with a radiative efficiency of @xmath563 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , this implies a radiated @xmath90-ray energy of a few times @xmath564 ergs , as inferred observationally @xcite . + figure [ fig3]a1 shows that , as the cylindrical region is approached , the lorentz factor increases more slowly than @xmath565 , resulting in a nonnegligible value of @xmath566 . since @xmath567 , this explains the divergence of the @xmath568 and @xmath569 curves in fig . [ fig3]a5 near the cylindrical region . [ [ transf_cyl ] ] can be written as @xmath570 , which shows that @xmath571 in the cylindrical regime . ) + the condition that the grb emission region be optically thin to the prompt @xmath90-ray photons typically implies a lower limit @xmath572 on the lorentz factor of the outflow ( e.g. , @xcite ) . the asymptotic lorentz factor attained in our fiducial solution ( and , in fact , in the other three solutions presented in this section ) readily satisfies this requirement . as noted at the beginning of [ results ] , we approximate the outflow as a pair of pancakes that move in opposite directions away from the disk . in the context of the internal - shock scenario , each pancake consists of a number @xmath573 of shells . the width of each shell is @xmath574 cm , where the total duration of the burst is @xmath575 s. if the ejection of the shells from the disk surface ( @xmath576 ) starts at time @xmath577 and ends at time @xmath369 , then each shell can be labeled by its ejection time @xmath578 , with @xmath579 . the shell `` @xmath112 '' moves along the poloidal fieldline and at time @xmath580 its position is @xmath581 . the distance between two neighboring shells @xmath112 , @xmath582 is ( using @xmath583 ) @xmath584 at early times the second term on the right - hand side of equation ( [ distance_of_shells ] ) is negligible and the frozen - pulse approximation holds ( the distance between the two shells is constant , @xmath585 ) . however , even if the integrand in the second term is tiny , there will eventually come a time ( call it @xmath586 ) when the integral will cancel the @xmath587 term ( for @xmath588 , corresponding to the trailing shell moving faster than the leading one ) . one can integrate the equation of motion for each shell , @xmath589 , with @xmath590 , to show that two neighboring shells with @xmath591 will not collide for as long as they move in the flow acceleration zone . this is a reflection of the fact that the difference in the initial lorentz factors of the two shells is not large enough to compensate for the longer acceleration time of the leading shell as it crosses this region , which also implies that the frozen - pulse assumption continues to hold throughout the acceleration zone . only after the shells reach the constant - velocity , cylindrical - flow region , will the two shells collide ( @xmath592 ) . using equation ( [ distance_of_shells ] ) , this will happen at a distance @xmath593 beyond the end of the acceleration zone . so long as the frozen - pulse approximation is valid , @xmath594 . as we proved in [ governing ] , it is possible to examine the motion of each shell in this regime using the @xmath3 self - similar model . if we focus on the shell @xmath595 , then the parameter @xmath261 and boundary conditions @xmath596 that we used to specify the solution refer to this particular @xmath595 , and the corresponding solution @xmath597 is valid only for this shell . in general , we may choose a different set @xmath598 for a different shell @xmath112 , but we have to be careful to also satisfy the assumption of a quasi - steady poloidal field , which requires all the shells to experience the same poloidal magnetic field at any given location . this requirement constrains the choice of boundary conditions . no constraint is necessary in the force - free regime , in which the electromagnetic field is effectively decoupled from the matter in that there is no feedback from the matter acceleration to the field . the electromagnetic field only guides the flow and the motion is effectively hd . as we proved in vk01 , one simply has to replace the spherical @xmath3 in the radial - outflow scalings ( e.g. , @xcite ) with the cylindrical radius @xmath337 to get the correct scalings in the magnetically guided case . however , in the superfast regime ( @xmath599 , @xmath600 ) , one finds that the ( appropriately simplified ) bernoulli and transfield force - balance equations ( eqs . [ [ bernoulli - rss ] ] and [ [ transfield - rss ] ] ) become completely @xmath112-independent if one writes @xmath601 , @xmath602 , and @xmath603 . ( @xmath261 must also be @xmath112-independent . ) thus , we are free to specify the functions @xmath604 , @xmath262 , @xmath264 , and @xmath265 when @xmath605 , and from the fact that @xmath141 is @xmath112-independent we then also have @xmath606 . these functions correspond to the initial conditions for each shell , obeying the quasi - steady poloidal magnetic field assumption . using @xmath607 in any quantity @xmath608 , we may find either the time dependence following the motion of a particular shell : @xmath609 with @xmath112 held constant , or the time dependence at a given point in space as different shells pass by : @xmath610 , with @xmath611 held fixed . the `` initial '' value @xmath612 corresponds to the time @xmath613 when the shell @xmath112 is ejected from the surface @xmath614 . thus , we see that the @xmath112-dependence in @xmath615 represents the initial conditions at the ejection surface for each shell . to illustrate how the time dependence in our model can be recovered , we now consider the baryon mass density along the flow . from equation ( [ gamma - rho - rss ] ) , @xmath616^{\frac{4}{f } } \mu(s_0 ) x_a^4(s_0 ) g(s ) \ a^{2-\frac{4}{f } } } { 4 \pi c^2 f^{\frac{4}{f } } \sigma_m(s_0 ) g^2(s_0 ) \left[{\cal m}^2(\theta ) + { \cal x}^2(\theta)\right ] \sigma_m(s ) } \nonumber \\ & & \times \frac{{\cal m}^2(\theta ) g(s)-1+x_a^2(s ) } { { \cal m}^2(\theta ) g(s ) } \frac{{\cal x}^2(\theta ) g(s ) + { \cal m}^2(\theta ) g(s ) } { { \cal x}^2(\theta ) g(s ) + { \cal m}^2(\theta ) g(s)-1}\ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] neglecting the second line ( which is approximately equal to 1 in the non force - free regime ) , @xmath617 figure [ fig5 ] shows @xmath618 as a function of the arclength along the inner fieldline at various times ( as in the hd case illustrated in fig . 1a of @xcite ) . at each instant of time @xmath580 , one can identify ( using @xmath619 ) which shell @xmath112 is at the point @xmath611 . knowing the distribution of @xmath620 as a function of @xmath611 for the reference shell @xmath595 , one can obtain the density for all the other shells ( corresponding to a particular choice of the function @xmath621 , such as the one depicted in fig . [ fig5]b ) . the ideal - mhd theory is not always a good approximation ; in some cases it must be replaced by an exact multi - fluid theory including a relativistic ohm s law ( e.g. , * ? ? ? a necessary condition for its applicability , derived from the need to attain the requisite charge density and current , implies a lower limit on the matter density ( e.g. , * ? ? ? the limits are @xmath622 , @xmath623 ( where @xmath624 the electron charge ) , and we have verified that they are well satisfied in all of our solutions . in particular , the protons and the neutralizing electrons have a sufficiently large number density to screen the electric field parallel to the flow and to provide the necessary charge density and current . our neglect of gravity has turned out to be a valid approximation , since the flow near the disk is thermally dominated and the temperature force density near the origin of our fiducial solution ( at @xmath625 , slightly above the slow - magnetosonic point ) is @xmath626 dyne @xmath476 , which is much larger than the gravitational force density associated with a central object of a few solar masses . in [ timerecovery ] we demonstrated that the frozen - pulse assumption is valid throughout the acceleration region . we have also neglected the terms @xmath627 and @xmath628 in equation ( [ momentum - s ] ) . our results by and large verify these approximations , as we find that only near the asymptotic cylindrical region does @xmath629 deviate from @xmath630 ( see fig . [ fig3]a5 ) . even so , the ratio of the terms in equation ( [ momentum - s ] ) that contain @xmath631 over the last term in that equation is @xmath632 , which ( using eq . [ [ ohm ] ] ) becomes @xmath633 . an alternative argument supporting the conclusion that @xmath634 is based on the requirements that @xmath635 and @xmath636 . the former gives ( using @xmath637 and eq . [ [ e_a ] ] ) @xmath638 , whereas the latter yields ( using eq . [ [ v - b ] ] ) @xmath639 . thus , the ratio @xmath640 is bounded in a tiny interval around @xmath641 , from @xmath642 to @xmath643 . in the limit of low temperatures ( @xmath645 , @xmath646 ) , we reproduce the exact cold relativistic solutions of @xcite , using a different parameter regime appropriate to grb outflows . @xcite employed the same model but examined more massive flows that were not close to being force - free and thus were not accelerated as efficiently . we present a cold solution in the second column of figure [ fig3 ] ; it can be readily compared with the fiducial solution @xmath384 . the cold solution is closer to being force - free , since @xmath647 ( using @xmath648 ) , and hence ( by eq . [ [ ximu ] ] ) @xmath649 . ( for comparison , @xmath650 for solution @xmath384 . ) since the flow does not pass through a slow magnetosonic point in this case , we are able to find the solution all the way down to the disk surface . near the origin the flow corotates with the disk ( @xmath651 ) and is accelerated due to the centrifugal force @xmath146 . the lorentz factor does not increase linearly with @xmath337 ( but rather , to a good approximation , as @xmath652 ) . however , the lorentz force soon takes over and thereafter @xmath102 ( see fig . [ fig3]b2 ) . at the classical fast point @xmath653 , equation ( [ a2 ] ) gives @xmath654 , which ( using @xmath655 ) can be transformed into the familiar form @xmath656 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? unlike the purely monopole case @xcite , this point is located at a finite distance from the origin , and the bulk of the magnetic acceleration occurs further downstream . the flow near the cylindrical regime is similar to that in the fiducial solution , as thermal effects are not important anymore . however , a signature of the cold solution can be seen in figure [ fig3]b6 in the weaker deviation of @xmath165 from @xmath657 . ( the solution of eq . [ [ cl_fast ] ] in this case is @xmath658 , and the deviation of @xmath165 from @xmath657 is due only to @xmath659 becoming larger than @xmath660 , which happens near the cylindrical region . ) this solution describes a slow rotator , in which the poynting flux is smaller than the enthalpy flux ( so @xmath662 ) . the angular velocity of the inner fieldline is @xmath663 rad s@xmath664 ( see table [ table1 ] ) , much smaller than the typical value ( @xmath665 rad s@xmath664 ) near a solar - mass black hole . this solution is characterized by significantly higher @xmath666 ratios ( see fig . [ fig3]c4 ) and much lower values of @xmath340 ( see fig . [ fig3]c6 ) in comparison with solutions @xmath384 and @xmath385 . it is also seen that this solution is not force - free : @xmath667 ( see eq . [ [ ximu ] ] ) . the acceleration in this case is thermal ( @xmath668 ; see fig . [ fig3]c2 ) . nevertheless , since the flow is trans - alfvnic , the poloidal magnetic pressure is much larger than the thermal pressure ( see fig . [ fig3]c5 ) . this can be understood from the fact that , in general , one has at the alfvn point @xmath669 only when the flow is super - alfvnic everywhere ( even near the origin ) can one obtain a hot , radial , hd - like solution with @xmath670 . the magnetic field only guides the flow in this case . the collimation , however , is not very efficient ( see fig . [ fig3]c1 ) . the flowlines `` attempt '' to become conical , but since in the framework of @xmath3 self - similarity the radial distance is given by @xmath671 , the only possible asymptotes as @xmath672 are @xmath673 . for @xmath674 we have cylindrical asymptotics ( as in solutions @xmath384 and @xmath385 ) , and the only other possibility is for all the flowlines to have the same asymptotic opening half - angle , which is the situation depicted in figure [ fig3]c1 . this behavior can be understood if we write the transfield force - balance equation as @xmath675 + \nonumber \\ + \frac{b_p^2}{4 \pi \varpi } \left(\frac{m v_{\phi } } { v_p}\right)^2 \hat{n } \cdot \hat{\varpi } - \hat{n } \cdot { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\left(p+\frac{b_p^2}{8 \pi}\right)\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( see @xcite ) . by neglecting the centrifugal ( @xmath676 ) and the poloidal magnetic pressure terms and using equation ( [ ohm ] ) ( which implies @xmath677 ) , equation ( [ transfield_v03 ] ) can be rewritten as @xmath678 the first term on the right - hand side is positive and acts to collimate the flow ( resulting in a positive poloidal curvature , @xmath212 ) , whereas the second term is negative and has the opposite effect on @xmath204 . in poynting flux - dominated solutions , the pressure term is negligible and the collimation continues ( albeit at a very low rate ; see paper ii ) until the shape becomes cylindrical . however , when the thermal pressure becomes comparable to the comoving magnetic pressure ( as in the present solution ; see fig . [ fig3]c5 ) , the two terms on the right - hand side of equation ( [ transfield_v03_appr ] ) cancel each other . the curvature @xmath679 thus vanishes before the cylindrical regime is reached , resulting in an asymptotic conical flow . for completeness , we also present a return - current ( @xmath680 ) solution . since , near the disk surface , @xmath681 is a decreasing function of @xmath246 in the @xmath330 case under consideration , the magnetic force acts to _ de_collimate the flow ( see [ sectioncollimation ] ) . this results in a weaker collimation than in the current - carrying ( @xmath326 ) solutions ( see fig . [ fig3]d1 ) . the electric force succeeds in collimating the flow despite the counter effect of the magnetic force ; as discussed in [ sectioncollimation ] , this is associated with the positive charge density ( @xmath682 ) expected in the return - current regime . examining the forces in the transfield direction , we find that @xmath683 ; i.e. , the lorentz force is balanced by the inertial force . ( this can be contrasted with the cylindrical solution @xmath384 , where the balance is provided by the centrifugal force : @xmath684 ; see figure [ fig4]b ) . as in the nonrelativistic , cold mhd flow considered by @xcite , the curvature radius is nonnegligible and the solution terminates at a finite height above the disk . we regard the fiducial solution @xmath384 as providing the most plausible representation of an accelerating grb outflow . neutrino energy deposition and magnetic field dissipation are likely to give rise to a nonnegligible thermal component at the origin , as envisioned in the original fireball scenario . such a component is incorporated into solution @xmath384 but is missing in solution @xmath385 . it is , nevertheless , worth reemphasizing that the dominant energy source even in solution @xmath384 is the poynting flux . we note in this connection that one of the potential problems of traditional fireball models has been the `` baryon contamination '' issue : why does the highly super - eddington luminosity that drives the fireball not lead to a more significant mass loading of the flow and thereby keep @xmath685 comparatively low ? if most of the requisite energy were injected in a nonradiative form , then this problem would be alleviated . the expectation that grb outflows are poynting flux - dominated also renders the slow - rotator ( enthalpy flux - dominated ) solution @xmath1 less relevant to their interpretation than the fiducial solution . grb outflows are inferred to be highly collimated at large distances from the origin : this has motivated us to construct our fiducial solution in the current - carrying ( @xmath686 ) regime , which is applicable near the symmetry axis ( see fig . [ fig1 ] ) . however , as demonstrated in figure [ fig3 ] , the illustrative current - carrying solution @xmath386 also becomes well collimated on a similar length scale , so it may also provide an adequate representation of such outflows . in fact , this regime may be a natural choice for modeling the far - downstream region of the flow since it corresponds to a plausible current - configuration on large scales ; furthermore , as shown in @xcite , it also results in a more efficient acceleration . we have opted to focus on the current - carrying regime in this paper since the solutions in this case , unlike the return - current solutions formally extends to infinity . we incorporate the return - current regime into a grb outflow model in @xcite . our fiducial self - similar `` hot '' solution as well as our `` cold '' relativistic mhd solution ( and the corresponding ones derived by @xcite and @xcite ) have cylindrical asymptotics . in the nonrelativistic theory , it was shown @xcite that it is possible to derive exact solutions of radially self - similar flows that have either one of the following three types of asymptotes : cylindrical , parabolic , or conical . although we expect that it should be possible to obtain different asymptotic behaviors also in radially self - similar relativistic flows , this has not yet been studied in detail . our basic conclusions about the magnetic acceleration of the flow do not , however , depend on the shape of the asymptotic flowlines , although the quantitative constraints on the mass loading ( to assure that the flow is optically thin in the shell - collision region ) would be eased if the flow continued to expand rather than collimated to a cylinder . grb jets are often modeled in terms of conical jets , and this picture has gained support from observations of a panchromatic break in the light curve of several grb afterglows ( from which jet half - opening angles in the range of @xmath687 to @xmath688 have been inferred ; e.g. , @xcite ) . however , a sharp physical boundary may not be required for interpreting the data in the context of a beam - patterned outflow ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? furthermore , it has been argued that a cylindrical jet model could provide a better fit to the light curves of at least some afterglows and might perhaps even be able to account for the panchromatic breaks commonly attributed to a finite jet opening angle ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? even if grb jets are not characterized by a global cylindrical geometry , the asymptotically cylindrical solutions that we derived may be applicable to the `` patchy shell '' scenario for variable grb outflows @xcite . in this picture , the outflowing shells are ejected within a given opening angle but do not fill the entire solid angle into which they are injected . in the context of the internal shock model , this scenario alleviates the energy requirements on bright bursts ; it is also consistent with the apparent lack of a strong correlation between the prompt high - energy and the afterglow fluences , and it may account for the early - time variability in the afterglow emission of a source like grb 021004 @xcite . in the phenomenological model considered by @xcite , successive blobs of angular scale @xmath689 are ejected randomly within an opening angle of @xmath690 , and the number of blobs ejected along a given direction ( given that more than one is required for the production of internal shocks ) is also taken to be a random number ( distributed uniformly in a predetermined range ) . this model was intended to mimic the behavior of causally disconnected regions in large - scale ejected shells . an alternative physical picture is that of a collection of magnetically active regions on the surface of the disk that feed the grb outflow . in this picture , the magnetic field associated with each `` patch '' guides successive `` mini '' shells along roughly congruent paths , thereby enhancing the efficiency of internal - shock production . however , the ejection directions from different sites need not be parallel to each other , so some of the beamed @xmath90-ray emission may miss the observer : this might contribute to the appearance of quiescent times between grb pulses @xcite . the high ( @xmath561 ) poynting - to - kinetic energy conversion efficiency exhibited by all our fast - rotator solutions ( solutions @xmath384 , @xmath385 , and @xmath386 ) has made it possible for our models to accommodate the internal - shock emission scenario without requiring a prohibitively large energy input at the source ( see [ results ] ) . however , currently available data on the radiated @xmath90-ray energy @xmath691 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) and the outflow kinetic energy @xmath692 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , which indicate that they are both approximately equal ( @xmath693 ) , are inconsistent with this scenario for any reasonable radiative energy efficiency of such shocks ( see @xcite for further discussion of this issue ) . one possible resolution of this apparent inconsistency is that the prompt high - energy emission arises directly from electromagnetic energy dissipation without the intermediate step of poynting - to - bulk - kinetic energy conversion ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? our solutions seem to be consistent with this possibility : they imply that about half of the injected energy is converted into bulk kinetic energy ; if the remaining poynting flux can be efficiently converted into high - energy emission , then this would lead to an approximate equality between @xmath691 and @xmath692 . @xcite used ideal - mhd equations with parameterized magnetic energy dissipation to demonstrate ( in the context of a strictly radial flow , i.e. , without taking into account the transfield force - balance equation that determines the fieldline shape ) that the poynting - to - radiation energy conversion could in principle be as high as 50% and that the dissipation may also result in significant bulk acceleration . it would be interesting to combine the approach taken by these authors ( see also @xcite and @xcite ) with the one utilized in this paper to consider the effects of dissipation in a _ nonradial _ flow . we now briefly compare the results of our exact solutions with some of the previous work on mhd effects in grb outflows . the incorporation of `` disposable '' magnetic energy into the traditional fireball model was discussed by @xcite . the behavior that they infer is consistent with our solutions in the regime where @xmath102 ( but not beyond it ) . @xcite interpreted the outflows in terms of pulsar winds that generate intense electromagnetic waves at the point where the ideal - mhd approximation breaks down . he highlighted the fact that the lorentz factors of the particles accelerated by such waves could be as high as @xmath694 and thus greatly exceed the terminal lorentz factors ( @xmath695 ) attained in the @xcite ideal - mhd monopole solution . the acceleration efficiency of our collimating ( and thus nonmonopolar ) ideal - mhd solutions is much higher yet : they yield @xmath696 . @xcite examined a magnetized conical jet with a pure electron - positron composition . they deduced ( and our solutions have confirmed ) that the pair photon fluid is initially accelerated by thermal pressure , with the magnetic field acting only to guide the flow . they also pointed out that radiation drag effects allow the pairs and photons to remain coupled even beyond the point where the scattering optical depth drops below 1 and that at some point pair annihilation freezes out . @xcite subsequently showed that the surviving pairs carry only a fraction @xmath697 of the initial energy , implying that , in the absence of magnetic acceleration , this scenario is extremely inefficient . we note , however , that if a nonnegligible fraction ( @xmath698 ) of the total injected energy is in magnetic form ( [ with the ratio of magnetic to pairs - plus - photons energy injection rates being @xmath699 , as assumed by @xcite ) , then , based on our `` cold '' solution ( see [ soln_b ] ) , half of the magnetic energy could be eventually transformed into kinetic energy of the surviving pairs , reaching overall efficiencies @xmath700 . as the rest - mass density of the final pair population , which represents only a tiny fraction of the initial rest - mass density of pairs . ] for @xmath701 this yields an efficiency of @xmath702 , which is significantly higher than the values estimated by @xcite . as was , however , discussed by these authors , the resulting outflow would have a huge lorentz factor and might not by itself be able to reproduce the observed properties of real grbs . although the presentation in this paper and its companion is focused on the application to grbs , our formalism is quite general and the solutions that we present should be relevant also to other magnetically driven relativistic outflow sources , notably agns and microquasars . the possible relationship between the different classes of beamed relativistic outflows in astrophysics has already been noted before by various authors . one potential attraction of adopting a common modeling framework for these outflows is that it could shed new light on each of the different types of sources . for example , the concept of internal shocks was originally proposed in the context of agn jets @xcite , and it has recently been adopted also for modeling microquasars @xcite . in the latter class of objects , there is direct observational evidence ( in the form of correlated x - ray , infrared , and radio flux variations and the appearance of superluminal radio knots ) for a causal connection between a rapid accretion episode onto the central black hole and the ejection of superluminal blobs ( e.g. , * ? ? ? this is the same basic scenario as the one commonly adopted ( albeit without direct observational support ) for grb outflows . a similar correlation between the x - ray and radio flux behavior and the appearance of radio - bright superluminal knots was recently discovered also in an agn jet @xcite . although the observed behavior in this case does not support the notion that agns are a simple scaled - up version of microquasars , this might be attributable to a different origin of the underlying disk instability that induces the accretion / ejection episodes ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) or to different environmental conditions ( e.g. , * ? ? ? there is now also evidence that the high - energy ( gev - range ) @xmath90-ray emission in the blazar class of agns originates in superluminal radio knots which likely represent discrete blobs or shocks in a relativistic jet at a large distance from the origin ( e.g. , * ? ? ? this is essentially the picture envisioned for grb outflows . the superluminal knots in blazar jets such as 3c 345 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) and 3c 279 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) are inferred to move along distinct curved paths , although in the former case it has been argued @xcite that at least two of the knots follow each other along the same trajectory . this behavior is consistent with the `` patchy shell '' model discussed above in connection with grbs . there are also indications that the outflows continue to accelerate on large scales : for example , the lorentz factor of knot c7 in the quasar 3c 345 was inferred to increase from @xmath703 to @xmath704 as it moved from a distance of @xmath705 from the galactic nucleus to @xmath706 @xcite . a scaled - down version of this behavior was found in the radio galaxy ngc 6251 , where knots in the radio jets were inferred to accelerate from @xmath707 at @xmath708 to @xmath709 at @xmath710 @xcite . such large - scale acceleration is most naturally interpreted in terms of a poynting - dominated jet model of the type discussed in this paper ( n. vlahakis & a. knigl , in preparation ) . in conclusion , we have derived in this paper the general formalism for radially self - similar , relativistic mhd outflows and presented exact solutions ( obtained by solving the euler and transfield equations and imposing regularity conditions at the relevant critical points ) to illustrate their basic properties . we focused on trans - alfvnic flows , deferring a discussion of super - alfvnic solutions to the companion paper . we considered `` hot '' and `` cold '' rapid - rotator flows ( the latter reproducing previous results by @xcite and @xcite ) as well as slow - rotator flows in the current - carrying regime ( which should apply near the rotation axis ) , but also described a `` hot , '' fast - rotator solution in the return - current regime . in all cases , we demonstrated that the poynting flux injected at the source can be transformed with high ( @xmath561 ) efficiency into kinetic energy of relativistic baryons at a large ( but finite ) distance from the origin . we concentrated on applications to grb outflows , although we pointed out that similar solutions may describe jet acceleration in agns and microquasars . in the application to grbs , we presented a particular `` hot , '' fast - rotator outflow as a fiducial solution . in this case the outflow is initially accelerated thermally , with the magnetic field acting only to guide and collimate it , but subsequently magnetic effects become fully dominant and are responsible for the bulk of the acceleration ( which occurs between the classical fast - magnetosonic and modified fast - magnetosonic surfaces ) and for the final collimation to cylindrical asymptotics . we stress , however , that this solution is only illustrative and is not meant to provide an accurate description of a typical grb flow . in this solution is about an order of magnitude higher than the minimum lorentz factors typically inferred in real grbs ( e.g. , * ? ? ? ] as we discuss in paper ii , super - alfvnic outflows can also provide plausible representations of grb outflows ; their basic properties , however , are quite similar to those of trans - alfvnic flows . we have , furthermore , concluded that solutions in the return - current regime may also be relevant to these flows ; we address this possibility in greater detail in a separate publication @xcite . this work was supported in part by nasa grant nag5 - 12635 and by the u.s . department of energy under grant b341495 to the center for astrophysical thermonuclear flashes at the university of chicago . n. v. also acknowledges support from a mccormick fellowship at the enrico fermi institute . we may combine equations ( [ int - omega ] ) , ( [ int - l ] ) , and ( [ int - mu ] ) to obtain @xmath712 , and @xmath223 as functions of @xmath713 @xmath340 , and @xmath293 using @xmath714 @xmath715 @xmath716 knowing the field - line constants ( for each @xmath112 ) @xmath717 we can find the quantities @xmath718 ( which in general are functions of @xmath719 , and @xmath112 ) by solving the following system of equations : @xmath720 the bernoulli equation @xmath721 which is obtained after substituting all quantities in the identity @xmath722 using equations ( [ a1],[a2 ] ) and which in the nonrelativistic limit takes the familiar form ( after taylor expanding in @xmath723 ) @xmath724 and the transfield equation ( obtained from the component of the momentum equation along @xmath725 ) @xmath726 \left(\frac{{{\mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}a}{\varpi } \right)^2 + \nonumber \\ & & + \left [ \frac{2 x_a^2}{\varpi_a^3 g } \left({{\mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}a \right)^2 + \frac{\mu^2 x_a^6 a^2}{\varpi_a^5 \sigma_m^2 m^2 g^3 } \left(\frac{g^2-m^2-x^2}{1-m^2-x^2}\right)^2\right ] \hat{\varpi } \cdot { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}a - \nonumber \\ & & -\frac{m^2}{2 } { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\left[\left(\frac{{{\mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}a } { \varpi } \right)^2\right ] \cdot { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}a -\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma } { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\left [ \frac{\xi ( \xi-1)}{m^2 } \frac{a^2 x_a^4}{\sigma_m^2 \varpi_a^4 } \right ] \cdot { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}a - \nonumber \\ & & - \frac{1}{2 \varpi^2 } { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\left [ \frac{\mu^2 a^2 x_a^6}{\sigma_m^2 \varpi_a^2 } \left(\frac{1-g^2}{1-m^2-x^2}\right)^2\right ] \cdot { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}a = 0\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the operator @xmath727 is related to the curvature radius @xmath728 . the latter equation can be written as [ forces - perp ] @xmath729 where the subscript @xmath198 denotes the component of a force perpendicular to the poloidal fieldline and pointing toward the axis ( along @xmath730 ) , and where the individual terms are given by @xmath731 \cdot \frac{{{\mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\alpha}{\mid { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\alpha \mid}- \frac { m^2 \varpi_0 ^ 3 \mid { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}{\cal a}\mid}{4 \alpha g^2 } \l { \cal a } \right\}\ , \label{fibot } \\ & & { { { \mathbf { f}}}}_{p \bot}=\frac{b_0 ^ 2}{4 \pi \varpi_0 } \frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma } \varpi_0 { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\left [ \frac{\xi ( \xi-1)}{m^2 } \frac{c^2 \psi_a^2}{b_0 ^ 2}\right ] \cdot \frac{{{\mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\alpha}{\mid { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\alpha \mid}\ , \\ & & { { { \mathbf { f}}}}_{e \bot}=-\frac{b_0 ^ 2}{4 \pi \varpi_0 } \frac{x_a^2 \varpi_0 \mid { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}{\cal a } \mid}{4 \alpha } \left[\varpi_0 ^ 2 \l { \cal a}+\frac{2 } { g \alpha^{1/2 } } \varpi_0 \hat{\varpi } \cdot { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}{\cal a } + \left(\varpi_0 { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}{\cal a } \right)^2 \left(\frac{1}{x_a}\frac{dx_a}{{\cal a}}-\frac{1}{2 \alpha}\frac{d \alpha}{d { \cal a}}\right)\right]\ , \\ & & { { { \mathbf { f}}}}_{b \bot}=\frac{b_0 ^ 2}{4 \pi \varpi_0 } \left \ { \frac{1}{2 \alpha g^2 } \varpi_0 { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\left [ \alpha x_a^2 \mu^2 \frac{c^2 \psi_a^2}{b_0 ^ 2 } \left(\frac{1-g^2}{1-m^2-x^2}\right)^2\right ] \cdot \frac{{{\mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\alpha}{\mid { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}\alpha \mid } + \frac{\varpi_0 \mid { { \mathbf{\nabla}}\!\!_s}{\cal a } \mid}{4 \alpha g^2 } \varpi_0 ^ 2 \l { \cal a } \right\}\ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the @xmath3 self - similar model described in [ r - ss_section ] , the integrals of motion have the following form : [ integrals ] @xmath732\ , , \quad \mbox{where } \quad \sigma_0\ , , \alpha_0=const\ , , \quad \mu\ , , x_a\ , , q = const\ , , \quad a=\frac{b_0 \varpi_0 ^ 2}{f } \left(\alpha^{\frac{f}{2}}- \alpha^{\frac{f}{2}}_0 \right)\ , \ ] ] with the fieldline constants given by @xmath733 note that @xmath309 is the `` magnetization parameter '' in the monopole solution of @xcite . in cases where @xmath734 , the requirement that the magnetic flux function @xmath141 vanishes on the rotation axis @xmath345 implies that @xmath735 when @xmath736 and @xmath737 . we examine solutions with @xmath735 throughout this paper . [ theta - eqs ] equations ( [ x - m ] ) and ( [ bernoulli ] ) take the form @xmath738 @xmath739 @xmath740 and can be solved for @xmath741 , and @xmath138 . using @xmath742 and equation ( [ alpha ] ) , we get @xmath743 or , @xmath744 the transfield equation ( [ transfield ] ) becomes @xmath745 = & & \left(f-1\right ) \frac{x_a^4 \mu^2 x^2}{f^2 \sigma_m^2 } \left ( \frac{1-g^2}{1-m^2-x^2 } \right)^2 -\sin^2 \theta \frac{m^2+f x^2 -f + 1}{\cos^2 \left(\psi+\theta\right)}- \nonumber \\ & & -\frac{x_a^4 \mu^2 x^2}{f^2 \sigma_m^2 m^2 } \left ( \frac{g^2-m^2-x^2}{1-m^2-x^2 } \right)^2 + 2 \frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma } \frac{f-2}{f^2 \sigma_m^2 } \frac{\xi \left(\xi-1\right)x^4}{m^2 } \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the magnetization function @xmath746 is defined as the poynting - to - matter energy flux ratio : @xmath747 at the alfvn singular point @xmath748 , @xmath749 , @xmath500 , @xmath501 , @xmath750 , @xmath751 , @xmath752 , and , using lh@xmath753spital s rule , @xmath754_a=\frac{1}{\sigma_a+1}\ , , \ \left[\frac{1-g^2}{1-m^2-x^2}\right]_a = \frac{\sigma_a / x_a^2}{\sigma_a+1 } \ , , \ \left[\frac{g^2-m^2-x^2}{1-m^2-x^2}\right]_a = \frac{x_a^2-(1-x_a^2)\sigma_a}{x_a^2 ( \sigma_a+1 ) } \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] substituting the above ratios into equation ( [ bernoulli - rss ] ) yields @xmath291 as a function of @xmath317 , @xmath316 , and @xmath276 , @xmath755 ^ 2 } \left[x_a^2 \xi_a^2 + \frac{f^2 \sigma_m^2 ( 1-x_a^2)^2 \sin^2 \theta_a } { x_a^2 \cos^2 ( \theta_a + \psi_a)}\right]\,,\ ] ] whereas equation ( [ transfield - rss ] ) gives the alfvn regularity condition @xmath756 \right\ } \nonumber \\ & & = \left[x_a^2-\sigma_a ( 1-x_a^2 ) \right]^2 - ( f-1)\sigma_a^2 ( 1-x_a^2 ) - 2 \frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma}(f-2)\frac{\xi_a-1}{\xi_a } \left\{x_a^2-\left[x_a^2-\sigma_a ( 1-x_a^2 ) \right]^2 \right\ } \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] next we prove the following statement : if one chooses @xmath757 ( the model parameters ) and specifies seven boundary conditions on a cone @xmath758 , then it is possible to derive all the other model parameters , and the solution is uniquely determined . _ proof : _ suppose that the quantities @xmath759 , @xmath223 , @xmath760 , @xmath761 , @xmath166 , @xmath12 , and @xmath762 are given as functions of @xmath3 along the cone @xmath758 ; i.e. , @xmath763 , @xmath764 , @xmath765 , @xmath766 , @xmath767 , @xmath768 , and @xmath769 . then one finds [ invert ] @xmath770 one is thus in a position to start the integration , using equations ( [ bernoulli - rss ] ) , ( [ g - rss ] ) , and ( [ transfield - rss ] ) , and find a solution that uniquely corresponds to the seven boundary conditions ( or , equivalently , to the parameters @xmath771 ) and the model parameters @xmath14 and @xmath261 . _ qed_. whether the solution actually hits and passes smoothly through any given singular point depends on the choice of the boundary conditions . from a physical standpoint , the most robust solutions cross all the three singular points ( the modified slow - magnetosonic , the alfvn , and the modified fast - magnetosonic points ) . in this case , the three regularity conditions at the ( a priori unknown ) positions of the singular points impose three relationships among the boundary conditions . suppose that we have obtained a solution of the axisymmetric , relativistic , ideal - mhd equations ( [ maxwell])([energy ] ) . if we consider localized , fast varying , axisymmetric disturbances , then we may assume that the unperturbed solution is uniform and time - independent and neglect all its space and time derivatives . we may then look for perturbations having a fourier dependence @xmath772 = \exp [ i(\omega_{\rm co } t_{\rm co } - { \boldsymbol { k}}_{\rm co}\cdot { \boldsymbol { r}}_{\rm co})]$ ] , where , by using the lorentz transformations between the comoving @xmath773 and observer s frame @xmath774 , we get @xmath775 $ ] . lies in the meridional plane , but that , nonetheless , the comoving wavevector @xmath776 has an azimuthal component ! ] it is more convenient to analyze the disturbances in the ( comoving ) flow frame . define a local cartesian system of coordinates @xmath777 such that @xmath778 , and @xmath779 . after linearizing equations ( [ maxwell])([energy ] ) , we may express all the perturbed quantities in terms of the perturbation @xmath780 . after some manipulation , we obtain @xmath781 where the alfvn speed can be expressed in terms of the corresponding proper speed @xmath782 , which satisfies @xmath783 . * alfvn waves : @xmath787 , or @xmath788 , corresponding to a displacement @xmath789 normal to the \{@xmath790 } plane . transforming the dispersion relation to the observer s frame , we get @xmath791\ .\ ] ] * slow / fast - magnetosonic waves : @xmath792 , or , @xmath793 , corresponding to a displacement @xmath789 in the \{@xmath794 } plane . in the observer s frame , we have @xmath795=0 \ .\end{aligned}\ ] ] an interesting property of the waves , related to the discussion on critical / singular surfaces of steady - state mhd , is the following : if the component of the flow proper velocity along the wavevector equals in magnitude , but is opposite in sign , to the comoving proper phase velocity of the wave , then @xmath796 and the wave is static . ( the converse is also true . ) thus , @xmath797 this statement is easily proved by combining @xmath798 with the lorentz invariant @xmath799 and solving for @xmath800 . + equation ( [ theorem ] ) is the generalization of the property of nonrelativistic static waves @xmath801 . it is consistent with the result that proper speeds are the appropriate generalization of ordinary speeds in relativistic theory ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) . piran , t. 2001b , in asp conf . ser . , from x - ray binaries to gamma - ray bursts , ed . e. p. j. van den heuvel , l. kaper , & e. rol . , in press ( astro - ph/0111314 ) piran , t. , shemi , a. , & narayan , r. 1993 , , 263 , 861 Abstract:
[ "we present a general formulation of special - relativistic magnetohydrodynamics and derive exact radially self - similar solutions for axisymmetric outflows from strongly magnetized , rotating compact objects . we generalize previous work by including thermal effects and analyze in detail the various forces that guide , accelerate , and collimate the flow . we demonstrate that , under the assumptions of a quasi - steady poloidal magnetic field and of a highly relativistic poloidal velocity , the equations become effectively time - independent and the motion can be described as a frozen pulse . we concentrate on trans - alfvnic solutions and consider outflows that are super - alfvnic throughout in the companion paper . our results are applicable to relativistic jets in gamma - ray burst ( grb ) sources , active galactic nuclei , and microquasars , but our discussion focuses on grbs . we envision the outflows in this case to initially consist of a hot and optically thick mixture of baryons , electron - positron pairs , and photons . we show that the flow is at first accelerated thermally but that the bulk of the acceleration is magnetic , with the asymptotic lorentz factor corresponding to a rough equipartition between the poynting and kinetic - energy fluxes ( i.e. , @xmath0 of the injected total energy is converted into baryonic kinetic energy ) . the electromagnetic forces also strongly collimate the flow , giving rise to an asymptotically cylindrical structure ." ]
19,778
19,778
24,000