Instruction
stringlengths 1.33k
3.91k
| Response
stringclasses 25
values | chat
stringlengths 1.39k
3.97k
|
---|---|---|
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The persistence of poverty worldwide has raised concerns about the effectiveness of financial aid. In my opinion, developed countries should utilize other non-monetary measures including educational opportunities to ensure the eradication of poverty.
There are multiple reasons why simply injecting funds into impoverished communities may not yield optimal outcomes. Limited access to modern advancements is one example. Some states require specific technologies that demand time, research, or opportunities for development. Thus, the money gifted will only solve surface-level problems like temporary food relief or medical care instead of creating sustainable tools to prevent famine. Moreover, even when technological innovations are available, the lack of qualifications and professional training hinders the optimal implementation of machinery. Additionally, some nations grapple with internal challenges such as corruption, political instability, or conflicts with bordering neighbours, which cannot be addressed by financial investments. For example, Ukraine sought assistance from the global political scene to alleviate its social and economic damage due to the Russian invasion.
To combat said issues, a preliminary comprehensive evaluation and negotiation process is essential to get to the root issues. Affluent nations should host exchange programs and form an international expert panel to help the recipients allocate funds effectively. Research teams can investigate a country's unique needs and conditions to provide consultations on national strategic planning. For instance, there have been many trade agreements to welcome foreign investments to boost manufacturing and create employment. Furthermore, granting study abroad scholarships encourages talented individuals to pursue high-quality education at prestigious institutions. Young people will eventually return home and become leaders who drive the progress of their country. All in all, an international effort is more necessary than sole financial assistance.
In conclusion, while providing money is undoubtedly valuable, developed countries must discern the specific needs of those they aim to support. I believe that the exchange of information, strategization, and expert involvement will transform short-term remedies into sustainable, long-term solutions to combat poverty.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The persistence of poverty worldwide has raised concerns about the effectiveness of financial aid. In my opinion, developed countries should utilize other non-monetary measures including educational opportunities to ensure the eradication of poverty.
There are multiple reasons why simply injecting funds into impoverished communities may not yield optimal outcomes. Limited access to modern advancements is one example. Some states require specific technologies that demand time, research, or opportunities for development. Thus, the money gifted will only solve surface-level problems like temporary food relief or medical care instead of creating sustainable tools to prevent famine. Moreover, even when technological innovations are available, the lack of qualifications and professional training hinders the optimal implementation of machinery. Additionally, some nations grapple with internal challenges such as corruption, political instability, or conflicts with bordering neighbours, which cannot be addressed by financial investments. For example, Ukraine sought assistance from the global political scene to alleviate its social and economic damage due to the Russian invasion.
To combat said issues, a preliminary comprehensive evaluation and negotiation process is essential to get to the root issues. Affluent nations should host exchange programs and form an international expert panel to help the recipients allocate funds effectively. Research teams can investigate a country's unique needs and conditions to provide consultations on national strategic planning. For instance, there have been many trade agreements to welcome foreign investments to boost manufacturing and create employment. Furthermore, granting study abroad scholarships encourages talented individuals to pursue high-quality education at prestigious institutions. Young people will eventually return home and become leaders who drive the progress of their country. All in all, an international effort is more necessary than sole financial assistance.
In conclusion, while providing money is undoubtedly valuable, developed countries must discern the specific needs of those they aim to support. I believe that the exchange of information, strategization, and expert involvement will transform short-term remedies into sustainable, long-term solutions to combat poverty.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The persistence of poverty worldwide has raised concerns about the effectiveness of financial aid. In my opinion, developed countries should utilize other non-monetary measures including educational opportunities to ensure the eradication of poverty.
There are multiple reasons why simply injecting funds into impoverished communities may not yield optimal outcomes. Limited access to modern advancements is one example. Some states require specific technologies that demand time, research, or opportunities for development. Thus, the money gifted will only solve surface-level problems like temporary food relief or medical care instead of creating sustainable tools to prevent famine. Moreover, even when technological innovations are available, the lack of qualifications and professional training hinders the optimal implementation of machinery. Additionally, some nations grapple with internal challenges such as corruption, political instability, or conflicts with bordering neighbours, which cannot be addressed by financial investments. For example, Ukraine sought assistance from the global political scene to alleviate its social and economic damage due to the Russian invasion.
To combat said issues, a preliminary comprehensive evaluation and negotiation process is essential to get to the root issues. Affluent nations should host exchange programs and form an international expert panel to help the recipients allocate funds effectively. Research teams can investigate a country's unique needs and conditions to provide consultations on national strategic planning. For instance, there have been many trade agreements to welcome foreign investments to boost manufacturing and create employment. Furthermore, granting study abroad scholarships encourages talented individuals to pursue high-quality education at prestigious institutions. Young people will eventually return home and become leaders who drive the progress of their country. All in all, an international effort is more necessary than sole financial assistance.
In conclusion, while providing money is undoubtedly valuable, developed countries must discern the specific needs of those they aim to support. I believe that the exchange of information, strategization, and expert involvement will transform short-term remedies into sustainable, long-term solutions to combat poverty.
| Your lexical resource score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The persistence of poverty worldwide has raised concerns about the effectiveness of financial aid. In my opinion, developed countries should utilize other non-monetary measures including educational opportunities to ensure the eradication of poverty.
There are multiple reasons why simply injecting funds into impoverished communities may not yield optimal outcomes. Limited access to modern advancements is one example. Some states require specific technologies that demand time, research, or opportunities for development. Thus, the money gifted will only solve surface-level problems like temporary food relief or medical care instead of creating sustainable tools to prevent famine. Moreover, even when technological innovations are available, the lack of qualifications and professional training hinders the optimal implementation of machinery. Additionally, some nations grapple with internal challenges such as corruption, political instability, or conflicts with bordering neighbours, which cannot be addressed by financial investments. For example, Ukraine sought assistance from the global political scene to alleviate its social and economic damage due to the Russian invasion.
To combat said issues, a preliminary comprehensive evaluation and negotiation process is essential to get to the root issues. Affluent nations should host exchange programs and form an international expert panel to help the recipients allocate funds effectively. Research teams can investigate a country's unique needs and conditions to provide consultations on national strategic planning. For instance, there have been many trade agreements to welcome foreign investments to boost manufacturing and create employment. Furthermore, granting study abroad scholarships encourages talented individuals to pursue high-quality education at prestigious institutions. Young people will eventually return home and become leaders who drive the progress of their country. All in all, an international effort is more necessary than sole financial assistance.
In conclusion, while providing money is undoubtedly valuable, developed countries must discern the specific needs of those they aim to support. I believe that the exchange of information, strategization, and expert involvement will transform short-term remedies into sustainable, long-term solutions to combat poverty.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The persistence of poverty worldwide has raised concerns about the effectiveness of financial aid. In my opinion, developed countries should utilize other non-monetary measures including educational opportunities to ensure the eradication of poverty.
There are multiple reasons why simply injecting funds into impoverished communities may not yield optimal outcomes. Limited access to modern advancements is one example. Some states require specific technologies that demand time, research, or opportunities for development. Thus, the money gifted will only solve surface-level problems like temporary food relief or medical care instead of creating sustainable tools to prevent famine. Moreover, even when technological innovations are available, the lack of qualifications and professional training hinders the optimal implementation of machinery. Additionally, some nations grapple with internal challenges such as corruption, political instability, or conflicts with bordering neighbours, which cannot be addressed by financial investments. For example, Ukraine sought assistance from the global political scene to alleviate its social and economic damage due to the Russian invasion.
To combat said issues, a preliminary comprehensive evaluation and negotiation process is essential to get to the root issues. Affluent nations should host exchange programs and form an international expert panel to help the recipients allocate funds effectively. Research teams can investigate a country's unique needs and conditions to provide consultations on national strategic planning. For instance, there have been many trade agreements to welcome foreign investments to boost manufacturing and create employment. Furthermore, granting study abroad scholarships encourages talented individuals to pursue high-quality education at prestigious institutions. Young people will eventually return home and become leaders who drive the progress of their country. All in all, an international effort is more necessary than sole financial assistance.
In conclusion, while providing money is undoubtedly valuable, developed countries must discern the specific needs of those they aim to support. I believe that the exchange of information, strategization, and expert involvement will transform short-term remedies into sustainable, long-term solutions to combat poverty.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The persistence of poverty worldwide has raised concerns about the effectiveness of financial aid. In my opinion, developed countries should utilize other non-monetary measures including educational opportunities to ensure the eradication of poverty.
There are multiple reasons why simply injecting funds into impoverished communities may not yield optimal outcomes. Limited access to modern advancements is one example. Some states require specific technologies that demand time, research, or opportunities for development. Thus, the money gifted will only solve surface-level problems like temporary food relief or medical care instead of creating sustainable tools to prevent famine. Moreover, even when technological innovations are available, the lack of qualifications and professional training hinders the optimal implementation of machinery. Additionally, some nations grapple with internal challenges such as corruption, political instability, or conflicts with bordering neighbours, which cannot be addressed by financial investments. For example, Ukraine sought assistance from the global political scene to alleviate its social and economic damage due to the Russian invasion.
To combat said issues, a preliminary comprehensive evaluation and negotiation process is essential to get to the root issues. Affluent nations should host exchange programs and form an international expert panel to help the recipients allocate funds effectively. Research teams can investigate a country's unique needs and conditions to provide consultations on national strategic planning. For instance, there have been many trade agreements to welcome foreign investments to boost manufacturing and create employment. Furthermore, granting study abroad scholarships encourages talented individuals to pursue high-quality education at prestigious institutions. Young people will eventually return home and become leaders who drive the progress of their country. All in all, an international effort is more necessary than sole financial assistance.
In conclusion, while providing money is undoubtedly valuable, developed countries must discern the specific needs of those they aim to support. I believe that the exchange of information, strategization, and expert involvement will transform short-term remedies into sustainable, long-term solutions to combat poverty.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The persistence of poverty worldwide has raised concerns about the effectiveness of financial aid. In my opinion, developed countries should utilize other non-monetary measures including educational opportunities to ensure the eradication of poverty.
There are multiple reasons why simply injecting funds into impoverished communities may not yield optimal outcomes. Limited access to modern advancements is one example. Some states require specific technologies that demand time, research, or opportunities for development. Thus, the money gifted will only solve surface-level problems like temporary food relief or medical care instead of creating sustainable tools to prevent famine. Moreover, even when technological innovations are available, the lack of qualifications and professional training hinders the optimal implementation of machinery. Additionally, some nations grapple with internal challenges such as corruption, political instability, or conflicts with bordering neighbours, which cannot be addressed by financial investments. For example, Ukraine sought assistance from the global political scene to alleviate its social and economic damage due to the Russian invasion.
To combat said issues, a preliminary comprehensive evaluation and negotiation process is essential to get to the root issues. Affluent nations should host exchange programs and form an international expert panel to help the recipients allocate funds effectively. Research teams can investigate a country's unique needs and conditions to provide consultations on national strategic planning. For instance, there have been many trade agreements to welcome foreign investments to boost manufacturing and create employment. Furthermore, granting study abroad scholarships encourages talented individuals to pursue high-quality education at prestigious institutions. Young people will eventually return home and become leaders who drive the progress of their country. All in all, an international effort is more necessary than sole financial assistance.
In conclusion, while providing money is undoubtedly valuable, developed countries must discern the specific needs of those they aim to support. I believe that the exchange of information, strategization, and expert involvement will transform short-term remedies into sustainable, long-term solutions to combat poverty.
| Your task achievement score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The persistence of poverty worldwide has raised concerns about the effectiveness of financial aid. In my opinion, developed countries should utilize other non-monetary measures including educational opportunities to ensure the eradication of poverty.
There are multiple reasons why simply injecting funds into impoverished communities may not yield optimal outcomes. Limited access to modern advancements is one example. Some states require specific technologies that demand time, research, or opportunities for development. Thus, the money gifted will only solve surface-level problems like temporary food relief or medical care instead of creating sustainable tools to prevent famine. Moreover, even when technological innovations are available, the lack of qualifications and professional training hinders the optimal implementation of machinery. Additionally, some nations grapple with internal challenges such as corruption, political instability, or conflicts with bordering neighbours, which cannot be addressed by financial investments. For example, Ukraine sought assistance from the global political scene to alleviate its social and economic damage due to the Russian invasion.
To combat said issues, a preliminary comprehensive evaluation and negotiation process is essential to get to the root issues. Affluent nations should host exchange programs and form an international expert panel to help the recipients allocate funds effectively. Research teams can investigate a country's unique needs and conditions to provide consultations on national strategic planning. For instance, there have been many trade agreements to welcome foreign investments to boost manufacturing and create employment. Furthermore, granting study abroad scholarships encourages talented individuals to pursue high-quality education at prestigious institutions. Young people will eventually return home and become leaders who drive the progress of their country. All in all, an international effort is more necessary than sole financial assistance.
In conclusion, while providing money is undoubtedly valuable, developed countries must discern the specific needs of those they aim to support. I believe that the exchange of information, strategization, and expert involvement will transform short-term remedies into sustainable, long-term solutions to combat poverty.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
31.Some people say that too much time and resource are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is of the opinion that the preservation of wildlife has accounted for too much time and resources. Personally, I hold a different perspective on this notion. In this essay, I will explain my justification in detail.
Firstly, it has been observed that the budget allocated to the conservation of wild animals and birds is still limited. This is because governments believe that animal welfare is only a minor importance, and other social issues should be prioritized. Therefore, they are unwilling to spend more funds on the protection of wildlife, making it difficult for organizations that are actually trying to make a difference. For example, in Vietnam, we do not see any long-lasting bird conservation due to a lack of financial support from the government. There are non-governmental organizations that are currently raising funds to protect the existing birds.
Secondly, I believe that dedicating time and effort to preserve wildlife is not only essential but also a moral imperative. This is because wild animals and birds play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity. They are a part of complex ecosystems and their extinction or decline can disrupt these ecosystems and lead to a range of adverse effects. Furthermore, preserving biodiversity can be beneficial for both ecological stability and human well-being as it impacts food, clean water and climate regulation. Additionally, people should have a moral responsibility to protect and care for the natural world. Various species are facing threats due to human activities, including habitat destruction, poaching and pollution. Thus, it is our ethical duty to rectify the harm we have caused and ensure that future generations can appreciate the beauty and diversity of wildlife.
In conclusion, while it is important to allocate resources effectively, and efficiently, the investment in wildlife preservation can be justified by the multitude of benefits it brings to society, ecosystems and future generations. Rather than viewing it as an expenditure, we should consider it an investment in the planet's health and well-being of all living creatures, including ourselves.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
31.Some people say that too much time and resource are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is of the opinion that the preservation of wildlife has accounted for too much time and resources. Personally, I hold a different perspective on this notion. In this essay, I will explain my justification in detail.
Firstly, it has been observed that the budget allocated to the conservation of wild animals and birds is still limited. This is because governments believe that animal welfare is only a minor importance, and other social issues should be prioritized. Therefore, they are unwilling to spend more funds on the protection of wildlife, making it difficult for organizations that are actually trying to make a difference. For example, in Vietnam, we do not see any long-lasting bird conservation due to a lack of financial support from the government. There are non-governmental organizations that are currently raising funds to protect the existing birds.
Secondly, I believe that dedicating time and effort to preserve wildlife is not only essential but also a moral imperative. This is because wild animals and birds play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity. They are a part of complex ecosystems and their extinction or decline can disrupt these ecosystems and lead to a range of adverse effects. Furthermore, preserving biodiversity can be beneficial for both ecological stability and human well-being as it impacts food, clean water and climate regulation. Additionally, people should have a moral responsibility to protect and care for the natural world. Various species are facing threats due to human activities, including habitat destruction, poaching and pollution. Thus, it is our ethical duty to rectify the harm we have caused and ensure that future generations can appreciate the beauty and diversity of wildlife.
In conclusion, while it is important to allocate resources effectively, and efficiently, the investment in wildlife preservation can be justified by the multitude of benefits it brings to society, ecosystems and future generations. Rather than viewing it as an expenditure, we should consider it an investment in the planet's health and well-being of all living creatures, including ourselves.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
31.Some people say that too much time and resource are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is of the opinion that the preservation of wildlife has accounted for too much time and resources. Personally, I hold a different perspective on this notion. In this essay, I will explain my justification in detail.
Firstly, it has been observed that the budget allocated to the conservation of wild animals and birds is still limited. This is because governments believe that animal welfare is only a minor importance, and other social issues should be prioritized. Therefore, they are unwilling to spend more funds on the protection of wildlife, making it difficult for organizations that are actually trying to make a difference. For example, in Vietnam, we do not see any long-lasting bird conservation due to a lack of financial support from the government. There are non-governmental organizations that are currently raising funds to protect the existing birds.
Secondly, I believe that dedicating time and effort to preserve wildlife is not only essential but also a moral imperative. This is because wild animals and birds play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity. They are a part of complex ecosystems and their extinction or decline can disrupt these ecosystems and lead to a range of adverse effects. Furthermore, preserving biodiversity can be beneficial for both ecological stability and human well-being as it impacts food, clean water and climate regulation. Additionally, people should have a moral responsibility to protect and care for the natural world. Various species are facing threats due to human activities, including habitat destruction, poaching and pollution. Thus, it is our ethical duty to rectify the harm we have caused and ensure that future generations can appreciate the beauty and diversity of wildlife.
In conclusion, while it is important to allocate resources effectively, and efficiently, the investment in wildlife preservation can be justified by the multitude of benefits it brings to society, ecosystems and future generations. Rather than viewing it as an expenditure, we should consider it an investment in the planet's health and well-being of all living creatures, including ourselves.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
31.Some people say that too much time and resource are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is of the opinion that the preservation of wildlife has accounted for too much time and resources. Personally, I hold a different perspective on this notion. In this essay, I will explain my justification in detail.
Firstly, it has been observed that the budget allocated to the conservation of wild animals and birds is still limited. This is because governments believe that animal welfare is only a minor importance, and other social issues should be prioritized. Therefore, they are unwilling to spend more funds on the protection of wildlife, making it difficult for organizations that are actually trying to make a difference. For example, in Vietnam, we do not see any long-lasting bird conservation due to a lack of financial support from the government. There are non-governmental organizations that are currently raising funds to protect the existing birds.
Secondly, I believe that dedicating time and effort to preserve wildlife is not only essential but also a moral imperative. This is because wild animals and birds play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity. They are a part of complex ecosystems and their extinction or decline can disrupt these ecosystems and lead to a range of adverse effects. Furthermore, preserving biodiversity can be beneficial for both ecological stability and human well-being as it impacts food, clean water and climate regulation. Additionally, people should have a moral responsibility to protect and care for the natural world. Various species are facing threats due to human activities, including habitat destruction, poaching and pollution. Thus, it is our ethical duty to rectify the harm we have caused and ensure that future generations can appreciate the beauty and diversity of wildlife.
In conclusion, while it is important to allocate resources effectively, and efficiently, the investment in wildlife preservation can be justified by the multitude of benefits it brings to society, ecosystems and future generations. Rather than viewing it as an expenditure, we should consider it an investment in the planet's health and well-being of all living creatures, including ourselves.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
31.Some people say that too much time and resource are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is of the opinion that the preservation of wildlife has accounted for too much time and resources. Personally, I hold a different perspective on this notion. In this essay, I will explain my justification in detail.
Firstly, it has been observed that the budget allocated to the conservation of wild animals and birds is still limited. This is because governments believe that animal welfare is only a minor importance, and other social issues should be prioritized. Therefore, they are unwilling to spend more funds on the protection of wildlife, making it difficult for organizations that are actually trying to make a difference. For example, in Vietnam, we do not see any long-lasting bird conservation due to a lack of financial support from the government. There are non-governmental organizations that are currently raising funds to protect the existing birds.
Secondly, I believe that dedicating time and effort to preserve wildlife is not only essential but also a moral imperative. This is because wild animals and birds play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity. They are a part of complex ecosystems and their extinction or decline can disrupt these ecosystems and lead to a range of adverse effects. Furthermore, preserving biodiversity can be beneficial for both ecological stability and human well-being as it impacts food, clean water and climate regulation. Additionally, people should have a moral responsibility to protect and care for the natural world. Various species are facing threats due to human activities, including habitat destruction, poaching and pollution. Thus, it is our ethical duty to rectify the harm we have caused and ensure that future generations can appreciate the beauty and diversity of wildlife.
In conclusion, while it is important to allocate resources effectively, and efficiently, the investment in wildlife preservation can be justified by the multitude of benefits it brings to society, ecosystems and future generations. Rather than viewing it as an expenditure, we should consider it an investment in the planet's health and well-being of all living creatures, including ourselves.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
31.Some people say that too much time and resource are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is of the opinion that the preservation of wildlife has accounted for too much time and resources. Personally, I hold a different perspective on this notion. In this essay, I will explain my justification in detail.
Firstly, it has been observed that the budget allocated to the conservation of wild animals and birds is still limited. This is because governments believe that animal welfare is only a minor importance, and other social issues should be prioritized. Therefore, they are unwilling to spend more funds on the protection of wildlife, making it difficult for organizations that are actually trying to make a difference. For example, in Vietnam, we do not see any long-lasting bird conservation due to a lack of financial support from the government. There are non-governmental organizations that are currently raising funds to protect the existing birds.
Secondly, I believe that dedicating time and effort to preserve wildlife is not only essential but also a moral imperative. This is because wild animals and birds play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity. They are a part of complex ecosystems and their extinction or decline can disrupt these ecosystems and lead to a range of adverse effects. Furthermore, preserving biodiversity can be beneficial for both ecological stability and human well-being as it impacts food, clean water and climate regulation. Additionally, people should have a moral responsibility to protect and care for the natural world. Various species are facing threats due to human activities, including habitat destruction, poaching and pollution. Thus, it is our ethical duty to rectify the harm we have caused and ensure that future generations can appreciate the beauty and diversity of wildlife.
In conclusion, while it is important to allocate resources effectively, and efficiently, the investment in wildlife preservation can be justified by the multitude of benefits it brings to society, ecosystems and future generations. Rather than viewing it as an expenditure, we should consider it an investment in the planet's health and well-being of all living creatures, including ourselves.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
31.Some people say that too much time and resource are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is of the opinion that the preservation of wildlife has accounted for too much time and resources. Personally, I hold a different perspective on this notion. In this essay, I will explain my justification in detail.
Firstly, it has been observed that the budget allocated to the conservation of wild animals and birds is still limited. This is because governments believe that animal welfare is only a minor importance, and other social issues should be prioritized. Therefore, they are unwilling to spend more funds on the protection of wildlife, making it difficult for organizations that are actually trying to make a difference. For example, in Vietnam, we do not see any long-lasting bird conservation due to a lack of financial support from the government. There are non-governmental organizations that are currently raising funds to protect the existing birds.
Secondly, I believe that dedicating time and effort to preserve wildlife is not only essential but also a moral imperative. This is because wild animals and birds play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity. They are a part of complex ecosystems and their extinction or decline can disrupt these ecosystems and lead to a range of adverse effects. Furthermore, preserving biodiversity can be beneficial for both ecological stability and human well-being as it impacts food, clean water and climate regulation. Additionally, people should have a moral responsibility to protect and care for the natural world. Various species are facing threats due to human activities, including habitat destruction, poaching and pollution. Thus, it is our ethical duty to rectify the harm we have caused and ensure that future generations can appreciate the beauty and diversity of wildlife.
In conclusion, while it is important to allocate resources effectively, and efficiently, the investment in wildlife preservation can be justified by the multitude of benefits it brings to society, ecosystems and future generations. Rather than viewing it as an expenditure, we should consider it an investment in the planet's health and well-being of all living creatures, including ourselves.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
31.Some people say that too much time and resource are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is of the opinion that the preservation of wildlife has accounted for too much time and resources. Personally, I hold a different perspective on this notion. In this essay, I will explain my justification in detail.
Firstly, it has been observed that the budget allocated to the conservation of wild animals and birds is still limited. This is because governments believe that animal welfare is only a minor importance, and other social issues should be prioritized. Therefore, they are unwilling to spend more funds on the protection of wildlife, making it difficult for organizations that are actually trying to make a difference. For example, in Vietnam, we do not see any long-lasting bird conservation due to a lack of financial support from the government. There are non-governmental organizations that are currently raising funds to protect the existing birds.
Secondly, I believe that dedicating time and effort to preserve wildlife is not only essential but also a moral imperative. This is because wild animals and birds play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity. They are a part of complex ecosystems and their extinction or decline can disrupt these ecosystems and lead to a range of adverse effects. Furthermore, preserving biodiversity can be beneficial for both ecological stability and human well-being as it impacts food, clean water and climate regulation. Additionally, people should have a moral responsibility to protect and care for the natural world. Various species are facing threats due to human activities, including habitat destruction, poaching and pollution. Thus, it is our ethical duty to rectify the harm we have caused and ensure that future generations can appreciate the beauty and diversity of wildlife.
In conclusion, while it is important to allocate resources effectively, and efficiently, the investment in wildlife preservation can be justified by the multitude of benefits it brings to society, ecosystems and future generations. Rather than viewing it as an expenditure, we should consider it an investment in the planet's health and well-being of all living creatures, including ourselves.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is thought by certain groups that different kinds of vehicles will be replaced by driverless systems. Since various benefits have witnessed in this trend, I personally suggest that the advantages are outweigh the disadvantages.
From the outset, driverless techniques have some hidden concerns that might increase the number of accidents. To elaborate, since driverless skills were just being developed not long times ago, most of the models are severely unstable. With that said, it did not only not generate convenience in people’s lives but also showed a detrimental impact on road safety. In addition, driverless technology might lead to mass unemployment. The obsolete automobiles brought massive costs to the transportation allied enterprises. Subsequently, company owners are more likely to choose driverless vehicles due to the fact that they can significantly curtail unnecessary personnel expenditures. Consequently, many private drivers will lose their careers in this process, resulting in serious unemployment.
On the other hand, even though there are many visible drawbacks mentioned previously, it still can be outweighed by the following merits. To begin with, driverless skills can free the time that people spend focusing on traffic conditions. This can undeniably foster productivity for certain people. To cite an example, drivers can deal with their documents or work-related chores in the auto-driving car, moreover, casually relax to recover from fatigue. Secondly, since this skill will become more advanced in the short term, it can concomitantly reduce vehicle crashes substantially. It has been proved that nearly 90% of incidents are caused by human error. With this fact, driverless technology might potentially address this problem to a certain extent after we possess mature skills in the driverless car spectrum.
To conclude, since the driverless technique has just emerged in the contemporary world, we are still not professional enough to control all the unpredicted factors. Nevertheless, the prospect of driverless is already viable at this moment, hence, the advantages of driverless is undoubtedly outweigh the demerits.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is thought by certain groups that different kinds of vehicles will be replaced by driverless systems. Since various benefits have witnessed in this trend, I personally suggest that the advantages are outweigh the disadvantages.
From the outset, driverless techniques have some hidden concerns that might increase the number of accidents. To elaborate, since driverless skills were just being developed not long times ago, most of the models are severely unstable. With that said, it did not only not generate convenience in people’s lives but also showed a detrimental impact on road safety. In addition, driverless technology might lead to mass unemployment. The obsolete automobiles brought massive costs to the transportation allied enterprises. Subsequently, company owners are more likely to choose driverless vehicles due to the fact that they can significantly curtail unnecessary personnel expenditures. Consequently, many private drivers will lose their careers in this process, resulting in serious unemployment.
On the other hand, even though there are many visible drawbacks mentioned previously, it still can be outweighed by the following merits. To begin with, driverless skills can free the time that people spend focusing on traffic conditions. This can undeniably foster productivity for certain people. To cite an example, drivers can deal with their documents or work-related chores in the auto-driving car, moreover, casually relax to recover from fatigue. Secondly, since this skill will become more advanced in the short term, it can concomitantly reduce vehicle crashes substantially. It has been proved that nearly 90% of incidents are caused by human error. With this fact, driverless technology might potentially address this problem to a certain extent after we possess mature skills in the driverless car spectrum.
To conclude, since the driverless technique has just emerged in the contemporary world, we are still not professional enough to control all the unpredicted factors. Nevertheless, the prospect of driverless is already viable at this moment, hence, the advantages of driverless is undoubtedly outweigh the demerits.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is thought by certain groups that different kinds of vehicles will be replaced by driverless systems. Since various benefits have witnessed in this trend, I personally suggest that the advantages are outweigh the disadvantages.
From the outset, driverless techniques have some hidden concerns that might increase the number of accidents. To elaborate, since driverless skills were just being developed not long times ago, most of the models are severely unstable. With that said, it did not only not generate convenience in people’s lives but also showed a detrimental impact on road safety. In addition, driverless technology might lead to mass unemployment. The obsolete automobiles brought massive costs to the transportation allied enterprises. Subsequently, company owners are more likely to choose driverless vehicles due to the fact that they can significantly curtail unnecessary personnel expenditures. Consequently, many private drivers will lose their careers in this process, resulting in serious unemployment.
On the other hand, even though there are many visible drawbacks mentioned previously, it still can be outweighed by the following merits. To begin with, driverless skills can free the time that people spend focusing on traffic conditions. This can undeniably foster productivity for certain people. To cite an example, drivers can deal with their documents or work-related chores in the auto-driving car, moreover, casually relax to recover from fatigue. Secondly, since this skill will become more advanced in the short term, it can concomitantly reduce vehicle crashes substantially. It has been proved that nearly 90% of incidents are caused by human error. With this fact, driverless technology might potentially address this problem to a certain extent after we possess mature skills in the driverless car spectrum.
To conclude, since the driverless technique has just emerged in the contemporary world, we are still not professional enough to control all the unpredicted factors. Nevertheless, the prospect of driverless is already viable at this moment, hence, the advantages of driverless is undoubtedly outweigh the demerits.
| Your lexical resource score is 6.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is thought by certain groups that different kinds of vehicles will be replaced by driverless systems. Since various benefits have witnessed in this trend, I personally suggest that the advantages are outweigh the disadvantages.
From the outset, driverless techniques have some hidden concerns that might increase the number of accidents. To elaborate, since driverless skills were just being developed not long times ago, most of the models are severely unstable. With that said, it did not only not generate convenience in people’s lives but also showed a detrimental impact on road safety. In addition, driverless technology might lead to mass unemployment. The obsolete automobiles brought massive costs to the transportation allied enterprises. Subsequently, company owners are more likely to choose driverless vehicles due to the fact that they can significantly curtail unnecessary personnel expenditures. Consequently, many private drivers will lose their careers in this process, resulting in serious unemployment.
On the other hand, even though there are many visible drawbacks mentioned previously, it still can be outweighed by the following merits. To begin with, driverless skills can free the time that people spend focusing on traffic conditions. This can undeniably foster productivity for certain people. To cite an example, drivers can deal with their documents or work-related chores in the auto-driving car, moreover, casually relax to recover from fatigue. Secondly, since this skill will become more advanced in the short term, it can concomitantly reduce vehicle crashes substantially. It has been proved that nearly 90% of incidents are caused by human error. With this fact, driverless technology might potentially address this problem to a certain extent after we possess mature skills in the driverless car spectrum.
To conclude, since the driverless technique has just emerged in the contemporary world, we are still not professional enough to control all the unpredicted factors. Nevertheless, the prospect of driverless is already viable at this moment, hence, the advantages of driverless is undoubtedly outweigh the demerits.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 6.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is thought by certain groups that different kinds of vehicles will be replaced by driverless systems. Since various benefits have witnessed in this trend, I personally suggest that the advantages are outweigh the disadvantages.
From the outset, driverless techniques have some hidden concerns that might increase the number of accidents. To elaborate, since driverless skills were just being developed not long times ago, most of the models are severely unstable. With that said, it did not only not generate convenience in people’s lives but also showed a detrimental impact on road safety. In addition, driverless technology might lead to mass unemployment. The obsolete automobiles brought massive costs to the transportation allied enterprises. Subsequently, company owners are more likely to choose driverless vehicles due to the fact that they can significantly curtail unnecessary personnel expenditures. Consequently, many private drivers will lose their careers in this process, resulting in serious unemployment.
On the other hand, even though there are many visible drawbacks mentioned previously, it still can be outweighed by the following merits. To begin with, driverless skills can free the time that people spend focusing on traffic conditions. This can undeniably foster productivity for certain people. To cite an example, drivers can deal with their documents or work-related chores in the auto-driving car, moreover, casually relax to recover from fatigue. Secondly, since this skill will become more advanced in the short term, it can concomitantly reduce vehicle crashes substantially. It has been proved that nearly 90% of incidents are caused by human error. With this fact, driverless technology might potentially address this problem to a certain extent after we possess mature skills in the driverless car spectrum.
To conclude, since the driverless technique has just emerged in the contemporary world, we are still not professional enough to control all the unpredicted factors. Nevertheless, the prospect of driverless is already viable at this moment, hence, the advantages of driverless is undoubtedly outweigh the demerits.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is thought by certain groups that different kinds of vehicles will be replaced by driverless systems. Since various benefits have witnessed in this trend, I personally suggest that the advantages are outweigh the disadvantages.
From the outset, driverless techniques have some hidden concerns that might increase the number of accidents. To elaborate, since driverless skills were just being developed not long times ago, most of the models are severely unstable. With that said, it did not only not generate convenience in people’s lives but also showed a detrimental impact on road safety. In addition, driverless technology might lead to mass unemployment. The obsolete automobiles brought massive costs to the transportation allied enterprises. Subsequently, company owners are more likely to choose driverless vehicles due to the fact that they can significantly curtail unnecessary personnel expenditures. Consequently, many private drivers will lose their careers in this process, resulting in serious unemployment.
On the other hand, even though there are many visible drawbacks mentioned previously, it still can be outweighed by the following merits. To begin with, driverless skills can free the time that people spend focusing on traffic conditions. This can undeniably foster productivity for certain people. To cite an example, drivers can deal with their documents or work-related chores in the auto-driving car, moreover, casually relax to recover from fatigue. Secondly, since this skill will become more advanced in the short term, it can concomitantly reduce vehicle crashes substantially. It has been proved that nearly 90% of incidents are caused by human error. With this fact, driverless technology might potentially address this problem to a certain extent after we possess mature skills in the driverless car spectrum.
To conclude, since the driverless technique has just emerged in the contemporary world, we are still not professional enough to control all the unpredicted factors. Nevertheless, the prospect of driverless is already viable at this moment, hence, the advantages of driverless is undoubtedly outweigh the demerits.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is thought by certain groups that different kinds of vehicles will be replaced by driverless systems. Since various benefits have witnessed in this trend, I personally suggest that the advantages are outweigh the disadvantages.
From the outset, driverless techniques have some hidden concerns that might increase the number of accidents. To elaborate, since driverless skills were just being developed not long times ago, most of the models are severely unstable. With that said, it did not only not generate convenience in people’s lives but also showed a detrimental impact on road safety. In addition, driverless technology might lead to mass unemployment. The obsolete automobiles brought massive costs to the transportation allied enterprises. Subsequently, company owners are more likely to choose driverless vehicles due to the fact that they can significantly curtail unnecessary personnel expenditures. Consequently, many private drivers will lose their careers in this process, resulting in serious unemployment.
On the other hand, even though there are many visible drawbacks mentioned previously, it still can be outweighed by the following merits. To begin with, driverless skills can free the time that people spend focusing on traffic conditions. This can undeniably foster productivity for certain people. To cite an example, drivers can deal with their documents or work-related chores in the auto-driving car, moreover, casually relax to recover from fatigue. Secondly, since this skill will become more advanced in the short term, it can concomitantly reduce vehicle crashes substantially. It has been proved that nearly 90% of incidents are caused by human error. With this fact, driverless technology might potentially address this problem to a certain extent after we possess mature skills in the driverless car spectrum.
To conclude, since the driverless technique has just emerged in the contemporary world, we are still not professional enough to control all the unpredicted factors. Nevertheless, the prospect of driverless is already viable at this moment, hence, the advantages of driverless is undoubtedly outweigh the demerits.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is thought by certain groups that different kinds of vehicles will be replaced by driverless systems. Since various benefits have witnessed in this trend, I personally suggest that the advantages are outweigh the disadvantages.
From the outset, driverless techniques have some hidden concerns that might increase the number of accidents. To elaborate, since driverless skills were just being developed not long times ago, most of the models are severely unstable. With that said, it did not only not generate convenience in people’s lives but also showed a detrimental impact on road safety. In addition, driverless technology might lead to mass unemployment. The obsolete automobiles brought massive costs to the transportation allied enterprises. Subsequently, company owners are more likely to choose driverless vehicles due to the fact that they can significantly curtail unnecessary personnel expenditures. Consequently, many private drivers will lose their careers in this process, resulting in serious unemployment.
On the other hand, even though there are many visible drawbacks mentioned previously, it still can be outweighed by the following merits. To begin with, driverless skills can free the time that people spend focusing on traffic conditions. This can undeniably foster productivity for certain people. To cite an example, drivers can deal with their documents or work-related chores in the auto-driving car, moreover, casually relax to recover from fatigue. Secondly, since this skill will become more advanced in the short term, it can concomitantly reduce vehicle crashes substantially. It has been proved that nearly 90% of incidents are caused by human error. With this fact, driverless technology might potentially address this problem to a certain extent after we possess mature skills in the driverless car spectrum.
To conclude, since the driverless technique has just emerged in the contemporary world, we are still not professional enough to control all the unpredicted factors. Nevertheless, the prospect of driverless is already viable at this moment, hence, the advantages of driverless is undoubtedly outweigh the demerits.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
It is true that technology has significant improvements in many aspects these days. A certain part of individuals suggest that the most essential target for technology ought to enhance human lives. I completely agree with this statement since technology not only can facilitate the medical environment but also benefit the agricultural sector in many terms.
From the outset, advanced science can undoubtedly strengthen the medical field by creating innovative techniques and intricate devices. To elaborate, the death rate used to be outrageously high before the 21st century when various medical machines and skills emerged. While experts and allied specialists begin to put heroic efforts into the medical spectrum nowadays, different forms of extraordinary medical devices have been invented, such as sophisticated machines for helping patients who were diagnosed with inspiratory diseases like tuberculosis, or certain techniques that aim at giving birth. As a result, either the death rate or fertility rate in society had made positive progress. Consequently maintaining a decent quality of our life.
On the other hand, innovative science can viably impact agriculture. To cite an example, many semi-arid areas have suffered from terrible drought. With superior irrigation systems created in the contemporary world, this sort of phenomenon can be addressed holistically, and concomitantly reinvigorating the economy. For example, several Middle Eastern countries have all suffering from this situation for a while, attributed to their defectively geographical condition. Since scientists introduced the irrigation system, they have subsequently been able to provide food for themselves, moreover, export their products worldwide. This again proves that human-aimed technology witnessed good effects and plays an integral role in this modern world.
To conclude, since cutting-edge science and terrific technology can benefit people’s lives in the medical field and agricultural range, I personally support and agree with the topic.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
It is true that technology has significant improvements in many aspects these days. A certain part of individuals suggest that the most essential target for technology ought to enhance human lives. I completely agree with this statement since technology not only can facilitate the medical environment but also benefit the agricultural sector in many terms.
From the outset, advanced science can undoubtedly strengthen the medical field by creating innovative techniques and intricate devices. To elaborate, the death rate used to be outrageously high before the 21st century when various medical machines and skills emerged. While experts and allied specialists begin to put heroic efforts into the medical spectrum nowadays, different forms of extraordinary medical devices have been invented, such as sophisticated machines for helping patients who were diagnosed with inspiratory diseases like tuberculosis, or certain techniques that aim at giving birth. As a result, either the death rate or fertility rate in society had made positive progress. Consequently maintaining a decent quality of our life.
On the other hand, innovative science can viably impact agriculture. To cite an example, many semi-arid areas have suffered from terrible drought. With superior irrigation systems created in the contemporary world, this sort of phenomenon can be addressed holistically, and concomitantly reinvigorating the economy. For example, several Middle Eastern countries have all suffering from this situation for a while, attributed to their defectively geographical condition. Since scientists introduced the irrigation system, they have subsequently been able to provide food for themselves, moreover, export their products worldwide. This again proves that human-aimed technology witnessed good effects and plays an integral role in this modern world.
To conclude, since cutting-edge science and terrific technology can benefit people’s lives in the medical field and agricultural range, I personally support and agree with the topic.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
It is true that technology has significant improvements in many aspects these days. A certain part of individuals suggest that the most essential target for technology ought to enhance human lives. I completely agree with this statement since technology not only can facilitate the medical environment but also benefit the agricultural sector in many terms.
From the outset, advanced science can undoubtedly strengthen the medical field by creating innovative techniques and intricate devices. To elaborate, the death rate used to be outrageously high before the 21st century when various medical machines and skills emerged. While experts and allied specialists begin to put heroic efforts into the medical spectrum nowadays, different forms of extraordinary medical devices have been invented, such as sophisticated machines for helping patients who were diagnosed with inspiratory diseases like tuberculosis, or certain techniques that aim at giving birth. As a result, either the death rate or fertility rate in society had made positive progress. Consequently maintaining a decent quality of our life.
On the other hand, innovative science can viably impact agriculture. To cite an example, many semi-arid areas have suffered from terrible drought. With superior irrigation systems created in the contemporary world, this sort of phenomenon can be addressed holistically, and concomitantly reinvigorating the economy. For example, several Middle Eastern countries have all suffering from this situation for a while, attributed to their defectively geographical condition. Since scientists introduced the irrigation system, they have subsequently been able to provide food for themselves, moreover, export their products worldwide. This again proves that human-aimed technology witnessed good effects and plays an integral role in this modern world.
To conclude, since cutting-edge science and terrific technology can benefit people’s lives in the medical field and agricultural range, I personally support and agree with the topic.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
It is true that technology has significant improvements in many aspects these days. A certain part of individuals suggest that the most essential target for technology ought to enhance human lives. I completely agree with this statement since technology not only can facilitate the medical environment but also benefit the agricultural sector in many terms.
From the outset, advanced science can undoubtedly strengthen the medical field by creating innovative techniques and intricate devices. To elaborate, the death rate used to be outrageously high before the 21st century when various medical machines and skills emerged. While experts and allied specialists begin to put heroic efforts into the medical spectrum nowadays, different forms of extraordinary medical devices have been invented, such as sophisticated machines for helping patients who were diagnosed with inspiratory diseases like tuberculosis, or certain techniques that aim at giving birth. As a result, either the death rate or fertility rate in society had made positive progress. Consequently maintaining a decent quality of our life.
On the other hand, innovative science can viably impact agriculture. To cite an example, many semi-arid areas have suffered from terrible drought. With superior irrigation systems created in the contemporary world, this sort of phenomenon can be addressed holistically, and concomitantly reinvigorating the economy. For example, several Middle Eastern countries have all suffering from this situation for a while, attributed to their defectively geographical condition. Since scientists introduced the irrigation system, they have subsequently been able to provide food for themselves, moreover, export their products worldwide. This again proves that human-aimed technology witnessed good effects and plays an integral role in this modern world.
To conclude, since cutting-edge science and terrific technology can benefit people’s lives in the medical field and agricultural range, I personally support and agree with the topic.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
It is true that technology has significant improvements in many aspects these days. A certain part of individuals suggest that the most essential target for technology ought to enhance human lives. I completely agree with this statement since technology not only can facilitate the medical environment but also benefit the agricultural sector in many terms.
From the outset, advanced science can undoubtedly strengthen the medical field by creating innovative techniques and intricate devices. To elaborate, the death rate used to be outrageously high before the 21st century when various medical machines and skills emerged. While experts and allied specialists begin to put heroic efforts into the medical spectrum nowadays, different forms of extraordinary medical devices have been invented, such as sophisticated machines for helping patients who were diagnosed with inspiratory diseases like tuberculosis, or certain techniques that aim at giving birth. As a result, either the death rate or fertility rate in society had made positive progress. Consequently maintaining a decent quality of our life.
On the other hand, innovative science can viably impact agriculture. To cite an example, many semi-arid areas have suffered from terrible drought. With superior irrigation systems created in the contemporary world, this sort of phenomenon can be addressed holistically, and concomitantly reinvigorating the economy. For example, several Middle Eastern countries have all suffering from this situation for a while, attributed to their defectively geographical condition. Since scientists introduced the irrigation system, they have subsequently been able to provide food for themselves, moreover, export their products worldwide. This again proves that human-aimed technology witnessed good effects and plays an integral role in this modern world.
To conclude, since cutting-edge science and terrific technology can benefit people’s lives in the medical field and agricultural range, I personally support and agree with the topic.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
It is true that technology has significant improvements in many aspects these days. A certain part of individuals suggest that the most essential target for technology ought to enhance human lives. I completely agree with this statement since technology not only can facilitate the medical environment but also benefit the agricultural sector in many terms.
From the outset, advanced science can undoubtedly strengthen the medical field by creating innovative techniques and intricate devices. To elaborate, the death rate used to be outrageously high before the 21st century when various medical machines and skills emerged. While experts and allied specialists begin to put heroic efforts into the medical spectrum nowadays, different forms of extraordinary medical devices have been invented, such as sophisticated machines for helping patients who were diagnosed with inspiratory diseases like tuberculosis, or certain techniques that aim at giving birth. As a result, either the death rate or fertility rate in society had made positive progress. Consequently maintaining a decent quality of our life.
On the other hand, innovative science can viably impact agriculture. To cite an example, many semi-arid areas have suffered from terrible drought. With superior irrigation systems created in the contemporary world, this sort of phenomenon can be addressed holistically, and concomitantly reinvigorating the economy. For example, several Middle Eastern countries have all suffering from this situation for a while, attributed to their defectively geographical condition. Since scientists introduced the irrigation system, they have subsequently been able to provide food for themselves, moreover, export their products worldwide. This again proves that human-aimed technology witnessed good effects and plays an integral role in this modern world.
To conclude, since cutting-edge science and terrific technology can benefit people’s lives in the medical field and agricultural range, I personally support and agree with the topic.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
It is true that technology has significant improvements in many aspects these days. A certain part of individuals suggest that the most essential target for technology ought to enhance human lives. I completely agree with this statement since technology not only can facilitate the medical environment but also benefit the agricultural sector in many terms.
From the outset, advanced science can undoubtedly strengthen the medical field by creating innovative techniques and intricate devices. To elaborate, the death rate used to be outrageously high before the 21st century when various medical machines and skills emerged. While experts and allied specialists begin to put heroic efforts into the medical spectrum nowadays, different forms of extraordinary medical devices have been invented, such as sophisticated machines for helping patients who were diagnosed with inspiratory diseases like tuberculosis, or certain techniques that aim at giving birth. As a result, either the death rate or fertility rate in society had made positive progress. Consequently maintaining a decent quality of our life.
On the other hand, innovative science can viably impact agriculture. To cite an example, many semi-arid areas have suffered from terrible drought. With superior irrigation systems created in the contemporary world, this sort of phenomenon can be addressed holistically, and concomitantly reinvigorating the economy. For example, several Middle Eastern countries have all suffering from this situation for a while, attributed to their defectively geographical condition. Since scientists introduced the irrigation system, they have subsequently been able to provide food for themselves, moreover, export their products worldwide. This again proves that human-aimed technology witnessed good effects and plays an integral role in this modern world.
To conclude, since cutting-edge science and terrific technology can benefit people’s lives in the medical field and agricultural range, I personally support and agree with the topic.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
It is true that technology has significant improvements in many aspects these days. A certain part of individuals suggest that the most essential target for technology ought to enhance human lives. I completely agree with this statement since technology not only can facilitate the medical environment but also benefit the agricultural sector in many terms.
From the outset, advanced science can undoubtedly strengthen the medical field by creating innovative techniques and intricate devices. To elaborate, the death rate used to be outrageously high before the 21st century when various medical machines and skills emerged. While experts and allied specialists begin to put heroic efforts into the medical spectrum nowadays, different forms of extraordinary medical devices have been invented, such as sophisticated machines for helping patients who were diagnosed with inspiratory diseases like tuberculosis, or certain techniques that aim at giving birth. As a result, either the death rate or fertility rate in society had made positive progress. Consequently maintaining a decent quality of our life.
On the other hand, innovative science can viably impact agriculture. To cite an example, many semi-arid areas have suffered from terrible drought. With superior irrigation systems created in the contemporary world, this sort of phenomenon can be addressed holistically, and concomitantly reinvigorating the economy. For example, several Middle Eastern countries have all suffering from this situation for a while, attributed to their defectively geographical condition. Since scientists introduced the irrigation system, they have subsequently been able to provide food for themselves, moreover, export their products worldwide. This again proves that human-aimed technology witnessed good effects and plays an integral role in this modern world.
To conclude, since cutting-edge science and terrific technology can benefit people’s lives in the medical field and agricultural range, I personally support and agree with the topic.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
19.Many people use social media every day to get in touch with others and news events. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is said that social networks have multiple platforms for updating events occurring globally. In my opinion, they should use social networking sites to connect with their community. In this article, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using social media applications.
On the one hand, the main advantage of using social networking sites is eliminating communication barriers between people due to distance. Furthermore, using social networks for introverts to connect with each other is a valuable tool that can help them in various ways. Additionally, individuals can learn about the latest news that is trending around the world. For example, there are numerous applications that assist individuals to link up with others who share common passions and offer various abilities required for modern living.
On the other hand, excessive use of social media platforms can lead to wasting valuable time that could be used more effectively at work. Furthermore, it has become increasingly common for people to lead technologically advanced lives. As a result, cybercrime rates have significantly increased in the past few years. For example, recently, some people have been robbed by fake profiles online. There is no doubt that the crime of stealing personal information online is becoming increasingly serious, so these platforms need to be verified in order to avoid the loss or theft of personal information online.
In short, if used carefully, social media can be helpful in finding something for everyone. In contrast, unreasonable usage can lead to significant losses of both time and potentially money.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
19.Many people use social media every day to get in touch with others and news events. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is said that social networks have multiple platforms for updating events occurring globally. In my opinion, they should use social networking sites to connect with their community. In this article, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using social media applications.
On the one hand, the main advantage of using social networking sites is eliminating communication barriers between people due to distance. Furthermore, using social networks for introverts to connect with each other is a valuable tool that can help them in various ways. Additionally, individuals can learn about the latest news that is trending around the world. For example, there are numerous applications that assist individuals to link up with others who share common passions and offer various abilities required for modern living.
On the other hand, excessive use of social media platforms can lead to wasting valuable time that could be used more effectively at work. Furthermore, it has become increasingly common for people to lead technologically advanced lives. As a result, cybercrime rates have significantly increased in the past few years. For example, recently, some people have been robbed by fake profiles online. There is no doubt that the crime of stealing personal information online is becoming increasingly serious, so these platforms need to be verified in order to avoid the loss or theft of personal information online.
In short, if used carefully, social media can be helpful in finding something for everyone. In contrast, unreasonable usage can lead to significant losses of both time and potentially money.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
19.Many people use social media every day to get in touch with others and news events. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is said that social networks have multiple platforms for updating events occurring globally. In my opinion, they should use social networking sites to connect with their community. In this article, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using social media applications.
On the one hand, the main advantage of using social networking sites is eliminating communication barriers between people due to distance. Furthermore, using social networks for introverts to connect with each other is a valuable tool that can help them in various ways. Additionally, individuals can learn about the latest news that is trending around the world. For example, there are numerous applications that assist individuals to link up with others who share common passions and offer various abilities required for modern living.
On the other hand, excessive use of social media platforms can lead to wasting valuable time that could be used more effectively at work. Furthermore, it has become increasingly common for people to lead technologically advanced lives. As a result, cybercrime rates have significantly increased in the past few years. For example, recently, some people have been robbed by fake profiles online. There is no doubt that the crime of stealing personal information online is becoming increasingly serious, so these platforms need to be verified in order to avoid the loss or theft of personal information online.
In short, if used carefully, social media can be helpful in finding something for everyone. In contrast, unreasonable usage can lead to significant losses of both time and potentially money.
| Your lexical resource score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
19.Many people use social media every day to get in touch with others and news events. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is said that social networks have multiple platforms for updating events occurring globally. In my opinion, they should use social networking sites to connect with their community. In this article, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using social media applications.
On the one hand, the main advantage of using social networking sites is eliminating communication barriers between people due to distance. Furthermore, using social networks for introverts to connect with each other is a valuable tool that can help them in various ways. Additionally, individuals can learn about the latest news that is trending around the world. For example, there are numerous applications that assist individuals to link up with others who share common passions and offer various abilities required for modern living.
On the other hand, excessive use of social media platforms can lead to wasting valuable time that could be used more effectively at work. Furthermore, it has become increasingly common for people to lead technologically advanced lives. As a result, cybercrime rates have significantly increased in the past few years. For example, recently, some people have been robbed by fake profiles online. There is no doubt that the crime of stealing personal information online is becoming increasingly serious, so these platforms need to be verified in order to avoid the loss or theft of personal information online.
In short, if used carefully, social media can be helpful in finding something for everyone. In contrast, unreasonable usage can lead to significant losses of both time and potentially money.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
19.Many people use social media every day to get in touch with others and news events. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is said that social networks have multiple platforms for updating events occurring globally. In my opinion, they should use social networking sites to connect with their community. In this article, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using social media applications.
On the one hand, the main advantage of using social networking sites is eliminating communication barriers between people due to distance. Furthermore, using social networks for introverts to connect with each other is a valuable tool that can help them in various ways. Additionally, individuals can learn about the latest news that is trending around the world. For example, there are numerous applications that assist individuals to link up with others who share common passions and offer various abilities required for modern living.
On the other hand, excessive use of social media platforms can lead to wasting valuable time that could be used more effectively at work. Furthermore, it has become increasingly common for people to lead technologically advanced lives. As a result, cybercrime rates have significantly increased in the past few years. For example, recently, some people have been robbed by fake profiles online. There is no doubt that the crime of stealing personal information online is becoming increasingly serious, so these platforms need to be verified in order to avoid the loss or theft of personal information online.
In short, if used carefully, social media can be helpful in finding something for everyone. In contrast, unreasonable usage can lead to significant losses of both time and potentially money.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
19.Many people use social media every day to get in touch with others and news events. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is said that social networks have multiple platforms for updating events occurring globally. In my opinion, they should use social networking sites to connect with their community. In this article, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using social media applications.
On the one hand, the main advantage of using social networking sites is eliminating communication barriers between people due to distance. Furthermore, using social networks for introverts to connect with each other is a valuable tool that can help them in various ways. Additionally, individuals can learn about the latest news that is trending around the world. For example, there are numerous applications that assist individuals to link up with others who share common passions and offer various abilities required for modern living.
On the other hand, excessive use of social media platforms can lead to wasting valuable time that could be used more effectively at work. Furthermore, it has become increasingly common for people to lead technologically advanced lives. As a result, cybercrime rates have significantly increased in the past few years. For example, recently, some people have been robbed by fake profiles online. There is no doubt that the crime of stealing personal information online is becoming increasingly serious, so these platforms need to be verified in order to avoid the loss or theft of personal information online.
In short, if used carefully, social media can be helpful in finding something for everyone. In contrast, unreasonable usage can lead to significant losses of both time and potentially money.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
19.Many people use social media every day to get in touch with others and news events. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is said that social networks have multiple platforms for updating events occurring globally. In my opinion, they should use social networking sites to connect with their community. In this article, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using social media applications.
On the one hand, the main advantage of using social networking sites is eliminating communication barriers between people due to distance. Furthermore, using social networks for introverts to connect with each other is a valuable tool that can help them in various ways. Additionally, individuals can learn about the latest news that is trending around the world. For example, there are numerous applications that assist individuals to link up with others who share common passions and offer various abilities required for modern living.
On the other hand, excessive use of social media platforms can lead to wasting valuable time that could be used more effectively at work. Furthermore, it has become increasingly common for people to lead technologically advanced lives. As a result, cybercrime rates have significantly increased in the past few years. For example, recently, some people have been robbed by fake profiles online. There is no doubt that the crime of stealing personal information online is becoming increasingly serious, so these platforms need to be verified in order to avoid the loss or theft of personal information online.
In short, if used carefully, social media can be helpful in finding something for everyone. In contrast, unreasonable usage can lead to significant losses of both time and potentially money.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
19.Many people use social media every day to get in touch with others and news events. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is said that social networks have multiple platforms for updating events occurring globally. In my opinion, they should use social networking sites to connect with their community. In this article, I will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using social media applications.
On the one hand, the main advantage of using social networking sites is eliminating communication barriers between people due to distance. Furthermore, using social networks for introverts to connect with each other is a valuable tool that can help them in various ways. Additionally, individuals can learn about the latest news that is trending around the world. For example, there are numerous applications that assist individuals to link up with others who share common passions and offer various abilities required for modern living.
On the other hand, excessive use of social media platforms can lead to wasting valuable time that could be used more effectively at work. Furthermore, it has become increasingly common for people to lead technologically advanced lives. As a result, cybercrime rates have significantly increased in the past few years. For example, recently, some people have been robbed by fake profiles online. There is no doubt that the crime of stealing personal information online is becoming increasingly serious, so these platforms need to be verified in order to avoid the loss or theft of personal information online.
In short, if used carefully, social media can be helpful in finding something for everyone. In contrast, unreasonable usage can lead to significant losses of both time and potentially money.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Governments should spend on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
Instead of funding roads, governments should invest in railroads. I completely agree because this is a good decision for the public. In my, opinion there are two reasons.
Firstly, railways can carry a large number of passengers. They are an environment-friendly means of transport. It is travel is much more comfortable which is preferred by the customer. There are no traffic jams that can be seen on the road, Moreover passengers do not waste any time. They can go to the office, school, and other places on time. For example, for rail, fuel consumption is very high but they can carry a lot of commuters at a time, this is a cost-effective activity for the government. For which it is more affordable for transportation.
Secondly, Buses do not come at the proper time. So, people crowded on the road. But trains always arrive at the right place at the usual time. There is no gathering at the station. People can reach their destination quickly. The amount of noise pollution caused by buses and cars on the roads is not present at railway stations. For instance, in this modern era, every person wants to try to go to the office by car and sometimes public bus transportation for this reason they are fallen in a traffic jam and they can not be reached in just time as well.
To conclude, this is a useful investment in the railways while the government takes action. Additionally very quiet environment than the roads and the people like it.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Governments should spend on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
Instead of funding roads, governments should invest in railroads. I completely agree because this is a good decision for the public. In my, opinion there are two reasons.
Firstly, railways can carry a large number of passengers. They are an environment-friendly means of transport. It is travel is much more comfortable which is preferred by the customer. There are no traffic jams that can be seen on the road, Moreover passengers do not waste any time. They can go to the office, school, and other places on time. For example, for rail, fuel consumption is very high but they can carry a lot of commuters at a time, this is a cost-effective activity for the government. For which it is more affordable for transportation.
Secondly, Buses do not come at the proper time. So, people crowded on the road. But trains always arrive at the right place at the usual time. There is no gathering at the station. People can reach their destination quickly. The amount of noise pollution caused by buses and cars on the roads is not present at railway stations. For instance, in this modern era, every person wants to try to go to the office by car and sometimes public bus transportation for this reason they are fallen in a traffic jam and they can not be reached in just time as well.
To conclude, this is a useful investment in the railways while the government takes action. Additionally very quiet environment than the roads and the people like it.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Governments should spend on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
Instead of funding roads, governments should invest in railroads. I completely agree because this is a good decision for the public. In my, opinion there are two reasons.
Firstly, railways can carry a large number of passengers. They are an environment-friendly means of transport. It is travel is much more comfortable which is preferred by the customer. There are no traffic jams that can be seen on the road, Moreover passengers do not waste any time. They can go to the office, school, and other places on time. For example, for rail, fuel consumption is very high but they can carry a lot of commuters at a time, this is a cost-effective activity for the government. For which it is more affordable for transportation.
Secondly, Buses do not come at the proper time. So, people crowded on the road. But trains always arrive at the right place at the usual time. There is no gathering at the station. People can reach their destination quickly. The amount of noise pollution caused by buses and cars on the roads is not present at railway stations. For instance, in this modern era, every person wants to try to go to the office by car and sometimes public bus transportation for this reason they are fallen in a traffic jam and they can not be reached in just time as well.
To conclude, this is a useful investment in the railways while the government takes action. Additionally very quiet environment than the roads and the people like it.
| Your lexical resource score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Governments should spend on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
Instead of funding roads, governments should invest in railroads. I completely agree because this is a good decision for the public. In my, opinion there are two reasons.
Firstly, railways can carry a large number of passengers. They are an environment-friendly means of transport. It is travel is much more comfortable which is preferred by the customer. There are no traffic jams that can be seen on the road, Moreover passengers do not waste any time. They can go to the office, school, and other places on time. For example, for rail, fuel consumption is very high but they can carry a lot of commuters at a time, this is a cost-effective activity for the government. For which it is more affordable for transportation.
Secondly, Buses do not come at the proper time. So, people crowded on the road. But trains always arrive at the right place at the usual time. There is no gathering at the station. People can reach their destination quickly. The amount of noise pollution caused by buses and cars on the roads is not present at railway stations. For instance, in this modern era, every person wants to try to go to the office by car and sometimes public bus transportation for this reason they are fallen in a traffic jam and they can not be reached in just time as well.
To conclude, this is a useful investment in the railways while the government takes action. Additionally very quiet environment than the roads and the people like it.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Governments should spend on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
Instead of funding roads, governments should invest in railroads. I completely agree because this is a good decision for the public. In my, opinion there are two reasons.
Firstly, railways can carry a large number of passengers. They are an environment-friendly means of transport. It is travel is much more comfortable which is preferred by the customer. There are no traffic jams that can be seen on the road, Moreover passengers do not waste any time. They can go to the office, school, and other places on time. For example, for rail, fuel consumption is very high but they can carry a lot of commuters at a time, this is a cost-effective activity for the government. For which it is more affordable for transportation.
Secondly, Buses do not come at the proper time. So, people crowded on the road. But trains always arrive at the right place at the usual time. There is no gathering at the station. People can reach their destination quickly. The amount of noise pollution caused by buses and cars on the roads is not present at railway stations. For instance, in this modern era, every person wants to try to go to the office by car and sometimes public bus transportation for this reason they are fallen in a traffic jam and they can not be reached in just time as well.
To conclude, this is a useful investment in the railways while the government takes action. Additionally very quiet environment than the roads and the people like it.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Governments should spend on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
Instead of funding roads, governments should invest in railroads. I completely agree because this is a good decision for the public. In my, opinion there are two reasons.
Firstly, railways can carry a large number of passengers. They are an environment-friendly means of transport. It is travel is much more comfortable which is preferred by the customer. There are no traffic jams that can be seen on the road, Moreover passengers do not waste any time. They can go to the office, school, and other places on time. For example, for rail, fuel consumption is very high but they can carry a lot of commuters at a time, this is a cost-effective activity for the government. For which it is more affordable for transportation.
Secondly, Buses do not come at the proper time. So, people crowded on the road. But trains always arrive at the right place at the usual time. There is no gathering at the station. People can reach their destination quickly. The amount of noise pollution caused by buses and cars on the roads is not present at railway stations. For instance, in this modern era, every person wants to try to go to the office by car and sometimes public bus transportation for this reason they are fallen in a traffic jam and they can not be reached in just time as well.
To conclude, this is a useful investment in the railways while the government takes action. Additionally very quiet environment than the roads and the people like it.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Governments should spend on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
Instead of funding roads, governments should invest in railroads. I completely agree because this is a good decision for the public. In my, opinion there are two reasons.
Firstly, railways can carry a large number of passengers. They are an environment-friendly means of transport. It is travel is much more comfortable which is preferred by the customer. There are no traffic jams that can be seen on the road, Moreover passengers do not waste any time. They can go to the office, school, and other places on time. For example, for rail, fuel consumption is very high but they can carry a lot of commuters at a time, this is a cost-effective activity for the government. For which it is more affordable for transportation.
Secondly, Buses do not come at the proper time. So, people crowded on the road. But trains always arrive at the right place at the usual time. There is no gathering at the station. People can reach their destination quickly. The amount of noise pollution caused by buses and cars on the roads is not present at railway stations. For instance, in this modern era, every person wants to try to go to the office by car and sometimes public bus transportation for this reason they are fallen in a traffic jam and they can not be reached in just time as well.
To conclude, this is a useful investment in the railways while the government takes action. Additionally very quiet environment than the roads and the people like it.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Governments should spend on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
Instead of funding roads, governments should invest in railroads. I completely agree because this is a good decision for the public. In my, opinion there are two reasons.
Firstly, railways can carry a large number of passengers. They are an environment-friendly means of transport. It is travel is much more comfortable which is preferred by the customer. There are no traffic jams that can be seen on the road, Moreover passengers do not waste any time. They can go to the office, school, and other places on time. For example, for rail, fuel consumption is very high but they can carry a lot of commuters at a time, this is a cost-effective activity for the government. For which it is more affordable for transportation.
Secondly, Buses do not come at the proper time. So, people crowded on the road. But trains always arrive at the right place at the usual time. There is no gathering at the station. People can reach their destination quickly. The amount of noise pollution caused by buses and cars on the roads is not present at railway stations. For instance, in this modern era, every person wants to try to go to the office by car and sometimes public bus transportation for this reason they are fallen in a traffic jam and they can not be reached in just time as well.
To conclude, this is a useful investment in the railways while the government takes action. Additionally very quiet environment than the roads and the people like it.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
The government should spend money on trains than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree
Anwser:
It is undeniable that roads and trains are the most essential facilities nowadays, the government must focus on them to provide nations an easy transport and a comfortable life as well. I totally agree with this statement and I think it will affect cities in a positive way.
First, research has shown that people are more likely to live in cities where downtown due to more transport options provided such as cars and metros which makes accessing multiple spots much easier. For example, New City has the most opportunities for jobs and businesses all over the world which reflects crowded streets and places like offices, shops and restaurants. That's why the government spend millions of money to upgrade and create new methods that are related to the road and train structure. Moreover, it attracts people living outside the city to drive their own cars instead of taking a plane or taxi. Also, as long as roads and trains are increased the population will be controlled.
Second, it can give sport riders more chances to drive safely and enjoy their own luxury motor. furthermore, sometimes buying a new brand car is hard to afford so using the train will be much cheaper. For instance, In DUBAI the government provide monthly subscription tickets for less than 3 dollars so everyone can handle it.
In conclusion, This is one of the most common factors that help nations and make their communications faster and more reachable, and shows significant results in countries ,especially in crowded zones.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
The government should spend money on trains than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree
Anwser:
It is undeniable that roads and trains are the most essential facilities nowadays, the government must focus on them to provide nations an easy transport and a comfortable life as well. I totally agree with this statement and I think it will affect cities in a positive way.
First, research has shown that people are more likely to live in cities where downtown due to more transport options provided such as cars and metros which makes accessing multiple spots much easier. For example, New City has the most opportunities for jobs and businesses all over the world which reflects crowded streets and places like offices, shops and restaurants. That's why the government spend millions of money to upgrade and create new methods that are related to the road and train structure. Moreover, it attracts people living outside the city to drive their own cars instead of taking a plane or taxi. Also, as long as roads and trains are increased the population will be controlled.
Second, it can give sport riders more chances to drive safely and enjoy their own luxury motor. furthermore, sometimes buying a new brand car is hard to afford so using the train will be much cheaper. For instance, In DUBAI the government provide monthly subscription tickets for less than 3 dollars so everyone can handle it.
In conclusion, This is one of the most common factors that help nations and make their communications faster and more reachable, and shows significant results in countries ,especially in crowded zones.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
The government should spend money on trains than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree
Anwser:
It is undeniable that roads and trains are the most essential facilities nowadays, the government must focus on them to provide nations an easy transport and a comfortable life as well. I totally agree with this statement and I think it will affect cities in a positive way.
First, research has shown that people are more likely to live in cities where downtown due to more transport options provided such as cars and metros which makes accessing multiple spots much easier. For example, New City has the most opportunities for jobs and businesses all over the world which reflects crowded streets and places like offices, shops and restaurants. That's why the government spend millions of money to upgrade and create new methods that are related to the road and train structure. Moreover, it attracts people living outside the city to drive their own cars instead of taking a plane or taxi. Also, as long as roads and trains are increased the population will be controlled.
Second, it can give sport riders more chances to drive safely and enjoy their own luxury motor. furthermore, sometimes buying a new brand car is hard to afford so using the train will be much cheaper. For instance, In DUBAI the government provide monthly subscription tickets for less than 3 dollars so everyone can handle it.
In conclusion, This is one of the most common factors that help nations and make their communications faster and more reachable, and shows significant results in countries ,especially in crowded zones.
| Your lexical resource score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
The government should spend money on trains than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree
Anwser:
It is undeniable that roads and trains are the most essential facilities nowadays, the government must focus on them to provide nations an easy transport and a comfortable life as well. I totally agree with this statement and I think it will affect cities in a positive way.
First, research has shown that people are more likely to live in cities where downtown due to more transport options provided such as cars and metros which makes accessing multiple spots much easier. For example, New City has the most opportunities for jobs and businesses all over the world which reflects crowded streets and places like offices, shops and restaurants. That's why the government spend millions of money to upgrade and create new methods that are related to the road and train structure. Moreover, it attracts people living outside the city to drive their own cars instead of taking a plane or taxi. Also, as long as roads and trains are increased the population will be controlled.
Second, it can give sport riders more chances to drive safely and enjoy their own luxury motor. furthermore, sometimes buying a new brand car is hard to afford so using the train will be much cheaper. For instance, In DUBAI the government provide monthly subscription tickets for less than 3 dollars so everyone can handle it.
In conclusion, This is one of the most common factors that help nations and make their communications faster and more reachable, and shows significant results in countries ,especially in crowded zones.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
The government should spend money on trains than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree
Anwser:
It is undeniable that roads and trains are the most essential facilities nowadays, the government must focus on them to provide nations an easy transport and a comfortable life as well. I totally agree with this statement and I think it will affect cities in a positive way.
First, research has shown that people are more likely to live in cities where downtown due to more transport options provided such as cars and metros which makes accessing multiple spots much easier. For example, New City has the most opportunities for jobs and businesses all over the world which reflects crowded streets and places like offices, shops and restaurants. That's why the government spend millions of money to upgrade and create new methods that are related to the road and train structure. Moreover, it attracts people living outside the city to drive their own cars instead of taking a plane or taxi. Also, as long as roads and trains are increased the population will be controlled.
Second, it can give sport riders more chances to drive safely and enjoy their own luxury motor. furthermore, sometimes buying a new brand car is hard to afford so using the train will be much cheaper. For instance, In DUBAI the government provide monthly subscription tickets for less than 3 dollars so everyone can handle it.
In conclusion, This is one of the most common factors that help nations and make their communications faster and more reachable, and shows significant results in countries ,especially in crowded zones.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
The government should spend money on trains than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree
Anwser:
It is undeniable that roads and trains are the most essential facilities nowadays, the government must focus on them to provide nations an easy transport and a comfortable life as well. I totally agree with this statement and I think it will affect cities in a positive way.
First, research has shown that people are more likely to live in cities where downtown due to more transport options provided such as cars and metros which makes accessing multiple spots much easier. For example, New City has the most opportunities for jobs and businesses all over the world which reflects crowded streets and places like offices, shops and restaurants. That's why the government spend millions of money to upgrade and create new methods that are related to the road and train structure. Moreover, it attracts people living outside the city to drive their own cars instead of taking a plane or taxi. Also, as long as roads and trains are increased the population will be controlled.
Second, it can give sport riders more chances to drive safely and enjoy their own luxury motor. furthermore, sometimes buying a new brand car is hard to afford so using the train will be much cheaper. For instance, In DUBAI the government provide monthly subscription tickets for less than 3 dollars so everyone can handle it.
In conclusion, This is one of the most common factors that help nations and make their communications faster and more reachable, and shows significant results in countries ,especially in crowded zones.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
The government should spend money on trains than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree
Anwser:
It is undeniable that roads and trains are the most essential facilities nowadays, the government must focus on them to provide nations an easy transport and a comfortable life as well. I totally agree with this statement and I think it will affect cities in a positive way.
First, research has shown that people are more likely to live in cities where downtown due to more transport options provided such as cars and metros which makes accessing multiple spots much easier. For example, New City has the most opportunities for jobs and businesses all over the world which reflects crowded streets and places like offices, shops and restaurants. That's why the government spend millions of money to upgrade and create new methods that are related to the road and train structure. Moreover, it attracts people living outside the city to drive their own cars instead of taking a plane or taxi. Also, as long as roads and trains are increased the population will be controlled.
Second, it can give sport riders more chances to drive safely and enjoy their own luxury motor. furthermore, sometimes buying a new brand car is hard to afford so using the train will be much cheaper. For instance, In DUBAI the government provide monthly subscription tickets for less than 3 dollars so everyone can handle it.
In conclusion, This is one of the most common factors that help nations and make their communications faster and more reachable, and shows significant results in countries ,especially in crowded zones.
| Your task achievement score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
The government should spend money on trains than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree
Anwser:
It is undeniable that roads and trains are the most essential facilities nowadays, the government must focus on them to provide nations an easy transport and a comfortable life as well. I totally agree with this statement and I think it will affect cities in a positive way.
First, research has shown that people are more likely to live in cities where downtown due to more transport options provided such as cars and metros which makes accessing multiple spots much easier. For example, New City has the most opportunities for jobs and businesses all over the world which reflects crowded streets and places like offices, shops and restaurants. That's why the government spend millions of money to upgrade and create new methods that are related to the road and train structure. Moreover, it attracts people living outside the city to drive their own cars instead of taking a plane or taxi. Also, as long as roads and trains are increased the population will be controlled.
Second, it can give sport riders more chances to drive safely and enjoy their own luxury motor. furthermore, sometimes buying a new brand car is hard to afford so using the train will be much cheaper. For instance, In DUBAI the government provide monthly subscription tickets for less than 3 dollars so everyone can handle it.
In conclusion, This is one of the most common factors that help nations and make their communications faster and more reachable, and shows significant results in countries ,especially in crowded zones.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
12.Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The globalization and astonishing invention of the internet have had a great impact on learning methods. Although nowadays the majority of pupils have used the internet to learn and acquire the required information, libraries have their own importance in providing resources. I partially agree with the above notion and my reasons for the inclination are articulated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, it is true that, the Internet is a treasure of data and info in all fields and It has to have its own advantages. Firstly, any data on any subject can be attained in a fraction of a second around the clock; while libraries work only for a few hours a day. Secondly, it provides mobility, the material gets updated every second and one can get updated records in a minimal time. Finally, they provide comfort in getting information without going to a particular place and it is a boon to busy people.For instance, students can also acquire details of the ongoing research on a specific topic.
On the other hand, the libraries have their own importance. First of all, in terms of the ambience. Moreover, the libraries have a quiet environment with fewer distractions, which helps to study with full concentration. For example, During examinations, 30% of students prefer to study in college or school libraries. Furthermore, anybody can update the blog or material on the internet and thus there are no granted research papers available to find records of the experiments.
To conclude, however the internet is a great source of information with accessibility and mobility, the library has its own advantages such as ambience, quiet environment and proof of correct data with the name of the author.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
12.Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The globalization and astonishing invention of the internet have had a great impact on learning methods. Although nowadays the majority of pupils have used the internet to learn and acquire the required information, libraries have their own importance in providing resources. I partially agree with the above notion and my reasons for the inclination are articulated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, it is true that, the Internet is a treasure of data and info in all fields and It has to have its own advantages. Firstly, any data on any subject can be attained in a fraction of a second around the clock; while libraries work only for a few hours a day. Secondly, it provides mobility, the material gets updated every second and one can get updated records in a minimal time. Finally, they provide comfort in getting information without going to a particular place and it is a boon to busy people.For instance, students can also acquire details of the ongoing research on a specific topic.
On the other hand, the libraries have their own importance. First of all, in terms of the ambience. Moreover, the libraries have a quiet environment with fewer distractions, which helps to study with full concentration. For example, During examinations, 30% of students prefer to study in college or school libraries. Furthermore, anybody can update the blog or material on the internet and thus there are no granted research papers available to find records of the experiments.
To conclude, however the internet is a great source of information with accessibility and mobility, the library has its own advantages such as ambience, quiet environment and proof of correct data with the name of the author.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
12.Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The globalization and astonishing invention of the internet have had a great impact on learning methods. Although nowadays the majority of pupils have used the internet to learn and acquire the required information, libraries have their own importance in providing resources. I partially agree with the above notion and my reasons for the inclination are articulated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, it is true that, the Internet is a treasure of data and info in all fields and It has to have its own advantages. Firstly, any data on any subject can be attained in a fraction of a second around the clock; while libraries work only for a few hours a day. Secondly, it provides mobility, the material gets updated every second and one can get updated records in a minimal time. Finally, they provide comfort in getting information without going to a particular place and it is a boon to busy people.For instance, students can also acquire details of the ongoing research on a specific topic.
On the other hand, the libraries have their own importance. First of all, in terms of the ambience. Moreover, the libraries have a quiet environment with fewer distractions, which helps to study with full concentration. For example, During examinations, 30% of students prefer to study in college or school libraries. Furthermore, anybody can update the blog or material on the internet and thus there are no granted research papers available to find records of the experiments.
To conclude, however the internet is a great source of information with accessibility and mobility, the library has its own advantages such as ambience, quiet environment and proof of correct data with the name of the author.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
12.Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The globalization and astonishing invention of the internet have had a great impact on learning methods. Although nowadays the majority of pupils have used the internet to learn and acquire the required information, libraries have their own importance in providing resources. I partially agree with the above notion and my reasons for the inclination are articulated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, it is true that, the Internet is a treasure of data and info in all fields and It has to have its own advantages. Firstly, any data on any subject can be attained in a fraction of a second around the clock; while libraries work only for a few hours a day. Secondly, it provides mobility, the material gets updated every second and one can get updated records in a minimal time. Finally, they provide comfort in getting information without going to a particular place and it is a boon to busy people.For instance, students can also acquire details of the ongoing research on a specific topic.
On the other hand, the libraries have their own importance. First of all, in terms of the ambience. Moreover, the libraries have a quiet environment with fewer distractions, which helps to study with full concentration. For example, During examinations, 30% of students prefer to study in college or school libraries. Furthermore, anybody can update the blog or material on the internet and thus there are no granted research papers available to find records of the experiments.
To conclude, however the internet is a great source of information with accessibility and mobility, the library has its own advantages such as ambience, quiet environment and proof of correct data with the name of the author.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
12.Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The globalization and astonishing invention of the internet have had a great impact on learning methods. Although nowadays the majority of pupils have used the internet to learn and acquire the required information, libraries have their own importance in providing resources. I partially agree with the above notion and my reasons for the inclination are articulated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, it is true that, the Internet is a treasure of data and info in all fields and It has to have its own advantages. Firstly, any data on any subject can be attained in a fraction of a second around the clock; while libraries work only for a few hours a day. Secondly, it provides mobility, the material gets updated every second and one can get updated records in a minimal time. Finally, they provide comfort in getting information without going to a particular place and it is a boon to busy people.For instance, students can also acquire details of the ongoing research on a specific topic.
On the other hand, the libraries have their own importance. First of all, in terms of the ambience. Moreover, the libraries have a quiet environment with fewer distractions, which helps to study with full concentration. For example, During examinations, 30% of students prefer to study in college or school libraries. Furthermore, anybody can update the blog or material on the internet and thus there are no granted research papers available to find records of the experiments.
To conclude, however the internet is a great source of information with accessibility and mobility, the library has its own advantages such as ambience, quiet environment and proof of correct data with the name of the author.
| Your grammatical range score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
12.Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The globalization and astonishing invention of the internet have had a great impact on learning methods. Although nowadays the majority of pupils have used the internet to learn and acquire the required information, libraries have their own importance in providing resources. I partially agree with the above notion and my reasons for the inclination are articulated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, it is true that, the Internet is a treasure of data and info in all fields and It has to have its own advantages. Firstly, any data on any subject can be attained in a fraction of a second around the clock; while libraries work only for a few hours a day. Secondly, it provides mobility, the material gets updated every second and one can get updated records in a minimal time. Finally, they provide comfort in getting information without going to a particular place and it is a boon to busy people.For instance, students can also acquire details of the ongoing research on a specific topic.
On the other hand, the libraries have their own importance. First of all, in terms of the ambience. Moreover, the libraries have a quiet environment with fewer distractions, which helps to study with full concentration. For example, During examinations, 30% of students prefer to study in college or school libraries. Furthermore, anybody can update the blog or material on the internet and thus there are no granted research papers available to find records of the experiments.
To conclude, however the internet is a great source of information with accessibility and mobility, the library has its own advantages such as ambience, quiet environment and proof of correct data with the name of the author.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
12.Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The globalization and astonishing invention of the internet have had a great impact on learning methods. Although nowadays the majority of pupils have used the internet to learn and acquire the required information, libraries have their own importance in providing resources. I partially agree with the above notion and my reasons for the inclination are articulated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, it is true that, the Internet is a treasure of data and info in all fields and It has to have its own advantages. Firstly, any data on any subject can be attained in a fraction of a second around the clock; while libraries work only for a few hours a day. Secondly, it provides mobility, the material gets updated every second and one can get updated records in a minimal time. Finally, they provide comfort in getting information without going to a particular place and it is a boon to busy people.For instance, students can also acquire details of the ongoing research on a specific topic.
On the other hand, the libraries have their own importance. First of all, in terms of the ambience. Moreover, the libraries have a quiet environment with fewer distractions, which helps to study with full concentration. For example, During examinations, 30% of students prefer to study in college or school libraries. Furthermore, anybody can update the blog or material on the internet and thus there are no granted research papers available to find records of the experiments.
To conclude, however the internet is a great source of information with accessibility and mobility, the library has its own advantages such as ambience, quiet environment and proof of correct data with the name of the author.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
12.Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
The globalization and astonishing invention of the internet have had a great impact on learning methods. Although nowadays the majority of pupils have used the internet to learn and acquire the required information, libraries have their own importance in providing resources. I partially agree with the above notion and my reasons for the inclination are articulated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, it is true that, the Internet is a treasure of data and info in all fields and It has to have its own advantages. Firstly, any data on any subject can be attained in a fraction of a second around the clock; while libraries work only for a few hours a day. Secondly, it provides mobility, the material gets updated every second and one can get updated records in a minimal time. Finally, they provide comfort in getting information without going to a particular place and it is a boon to busy people.For instance, students can also acquire details of the ongoing research on a specific topic.
On the other hand, the libraries have their own importance. First of all, in terms of the ambience. Moreover, the libraries have a quiet environment with fewer distractions, which helps to study with full concentration. For example, During examinations, 30% of students prefer to study in college or school libraries. Furthermore, anybody can update the blog or material on the internet and thus there are no granted research papers available to find records of the experiments.
To conclude, however the internet is a great source of information with accessibility and mobility, the library has its own advantages such as ambience, quiet environment and proof of correct data with the name of the author.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that homeschooling should be banned because it has several drawbacks. Others think that it has a number of benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
Some are of the opinion that homeschooling ought to be prohibited due to its disadvantages, whereas others believe that it has several advantages. In my opinion, I consider that homeschooling is a great educational method which can benefit both parents and students.
On the one hand, according to some, family-led education can result in a number of pitfalls. One of the main reasons is that when children are homeschooled, they will lack social skills. In other words, going to school gives students the opportunity to mix with other children which can undoubtedly help them to develop their communication skills. However, if children study at home, they will most likely be alone most of the time. This will clearly impact their personalities negatively. Another reason why some oppose the idea of homeschooling is that it can be costly. Although parents can teach their children at home, not all parents have the knowledge to teach all subjects to their children. As a result, they have to hire private tutors to teach their children. In this case, they have to spend a lot of money, and for those who have financial issues, this can definitely affect their budgets.
On the other hand, some people claim that home-based learning can bring about a number of merits, and I agree. Firstly, this educational method helps students learn effectively. That is to say, parents or tutors can slow the lesson based on their children' or students' performance. For instance, if students are weak in science, a teacher can slow down the lesson to ensure that they master the lesson effectively. Nevertheless, in a normal class, this cannot be done because a teacher has to follow the curriculum of the school. Secondly, with this educational option, parents can monitor their children's behaviour. These days, many children behave badly because they are affected by their peers. When children are at home with their parents, they can monitor them most of the time, and therefore, they will behave well.
To sum up, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that homeschooling should not be banned owing to its positive aspects. If homeschooled were promoted, children would not only perform well academically but also would have great personalities.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that homeschooling should be banned because it has several drawbacks. Others think that it has a number of benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
Some are of the opinion that homeschooling ought to be prohibited due to its disadvantages, whereas others believe that it has several advantages. In my opinion, I consider that homeschooling is a great educational method which can benefit both parents and students.
On the one hand, according to some, family-led education can result in a number of pitfalls. One of the main reasons is that when children are homeschooled, they will lack social skills. In other words, going to school gives students the opportunity to mix with other children which can undoubtedly help them to develop their communication skills. However, if children study at home, they will most likely be alone most of the time. This will clearly impact their personalities negatively. Another reason why some oppose the idea of homeschooling is that it can be costly. Although parents can teach their children at home, not all parents have the knowledge to teach all subjects to their children. As a result, they have to hire private tutors to teach their children. In this case, they have to spend a lot of money, and for those who have financial issues, this can definitely affect their budgets.
On the other hand, some people claim that home-based learning can bring about a number of merits, and I agree. Firstly, this educational method helps students learn effectively. That is to say, parents or tutors can slow the lesson based on their children' or students' performance. For instance, if students are weak in science, a teacher can slow down the lesson to ensure that they master the lesson effectively. Nevertheless, in a normal class, this cannot be done because a teacher has to follow the curriculum of the school. Secondly, with this educational option, parents can monitor their children's behaviour. These days, many children behave badly because they are affected by their peers. When children are at home with their parents, they can monitor them most of the time, and therefore, they will behave well.
To sum up, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that homeschooling should not be banned owing to its positive aspects. If homeschooled were promoted, children would not only perform well academically but also would have great personalities.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that homeschooling should be banned because it has several drawbacks. Others think that it has a number of benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
Some are of the opinion that homeschooling ought to be prohibited due to its disadvantages, whereas others believe that it has several advantages. In my opinion, I consider that homeschooling is a great educational method which can benefit both parents and students.
On the one hand, according to some, family-led education can result in a number of pitfalls. One of the main reasons is that when children are homeschooled, they will lack social skills. In other words, going to school gives students the opportunity to mix with other children which can undoubtedly help them to develop their communication skills. However, if children study at home, they will most likely be alone most of the time. This will clearly impact their personalities negatively. Another reason why some oppose the idea of homeschooling is that it can be costly. Although parents can teach their children at home, not all parents have the knowledge to teach all subjects to their children. As a result, they have to hire private tutors to teach their children. In this case, they have to spend a lot of money, and for those who have financial issues, this can definitely affect their budgets.
On the other hand, some people claim that home-based learning can bring about a number of merits, and I agree. Firstly, this educational method helps students learn effectively. That is to say, parents or tutors can slow the lesson based on their children' or students' performance. For instance, if students are weak in science, a teacher can slow down the lesson to ensure that they master the lesson effectively. Nevertheless, in a normal class, this cannot be done because a teacher has to follow the curriculum of the school. Secondly, with this educational option, parents can monitor their children's behaviour. These days, many children behave badly because they are affected by their peers. When children are at home with their parents, they can monitor them most of the time, and therefore, they will behave well.
To sum up, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that homeschooling should not be banned owing to its positive aspects. If homeschooled were promoted, children would not only perform well academically but also would have great personalities.
| Your lexical resource score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that homeschooling should be banned because it has several drawbacks. Others think that it has a number of benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
Some are of the opinion that homeschooling ought to be prohibited due to its disadvantages, whereas others believe that it has several advantages. In my opinion, I consider that homeschooling is a great educational method which can benefit both parents and students.
On the one hand, according to some, family-led education can result in a number of pitfalls. One of the main reasons is that when children are homeschooled, they will lack social skills. In other words, going to school gives students the opportunity to mix with other children which can undoubtedly help them to develop their communication skills. However, if children study at home, they will most likely be alone most of the time. This will clearly impact their personalities negatively. Another reason why some oppose the idea of homeschooling is that it can be costly. Although parents can teach their children at home, not all parents have the knowledge to teach all subjects to their children. As a result, they have to hire private tutors to teach their children. In this case, they have to spend a lot of money, and for those who have financial issues, this can definitely affect their budgets.
On the other hand, some people claim that home-based learning can bring about a number of merits, and I agree. Firstly, this educational method helps students learn effectively. That is to say, parents or tutors can slow the lesson based on their children' or students' performance. For instance, if students are weak in science, a teacher can slow down the lesson to ensure that they master the lesson effectively. Nevertheless, in a normal class, this cannot be done because a teacher has to follow the curriculum of the school. Secondly, with this educational option, parents can monitor their children's behaviour. These days, many children behave badly because they are affected by their peers. When children are at home with their parents, they can monitor them most of the time, and therefore, they will behave well.
To sum up, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that homeschooling should not be banned owing to its positive aspects. If homeschooled were promoted, children would not only perform well academically but also would have great personalities.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that homeschooling should be banned because it has several drawbacks. Others think that it has a number of benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
Some are of the opinion that homeschooling ought to be prohibited due to its disadvantages, whereas others believe that it has several advantages. In my opinion, I consider that homeschooling is a great educational method which can benefit both parents and students.
On the one hand, according to some, family-led education can result in a number of pitfalls. One of the main reasons is that when children are homeschooled, they will lack social skills. In other words, going to school gives students the opportunity to mix with other children which can undoubtedly help them to develop their communication skills. However, if children study at home, they will most likely be alone most of the time. This will clearly impact their personalities negatively. Another reason why some oppose the idea of homeschooling is that it can be costly. Although parents can teach their children at home, not all parents have the knowledge to teach all subjects to their children. As a result, they have to hire private tutors to teach their children. In this case, they have to spend a lot of money, and for those who have financial issues, this can definitely affect their budgets.
On the other hand, some people claim that home-based learning can bring about a number of merits, and I agree. Firstly, this educational method helps students learn effectively. That is to say, parents or tutors can slow the lesson based on their children' or students' performance. For instance, if students are weak in science, a teacher can slow down the lesson to ensure that they master the lesson effectively. Nevertheless, in a normal class, this cannot be done because a teacher has to follow the curriculum of the school. Secondly, with this educational option, parents can monitor their children's behaviour. These days, many children behave badly because they are affected by their peers. When children are at home with their parents, they can monitor them most of the time, and therefore, they will behave well.
To sum up, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that homeschooling should not be banned owing to its positive aspects. If homeschooled were promoted, children would not only perform well academically but also would have great personalities.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that homeschooling should be banned because it has several drawbacks. Others think that it has a number of benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
Some are of the opinion that homeschooling ought to be prohibited due to its disadvantages, whereas others believe that it has several advantages. In my opinion, I consider that homeschooling is a great educational method which can benefit both parents and students.
On the one hand, according to some, family-led education can result in a number of pitfalls. One of the main reasons is that when children are homeschooled, they will lack social skills. In other words, going to school gives students the opportunity to mix with other children which can undoubtedly help them to develop their communication skills. However, if children study at home, they will most likely be alone most of the time. This will clearly impact their personalities negatively. Another reason why some oppose the idea of homeschooling is that it can be costly. Although parents can teach their children at home, not all parents have the knowledge to teach all subjects to their children. As a result, they have to hire private tutors to teach their children. In this case, they have to spend a lot of money, and for those who have financial issues, this can definitely affect their budgets.
On the other hand, some people claim that home-based learning can bring about a number of merits, and I agree. Firstly, this educational method helps students learn effectively. That is to say, parents or tutors can slow the lesson based on their children' or students' performance. For instance, if students are weak in science, a teacher can slow down the lesson to ensure that they master the lesson effectively. Nevertheless, in a normal class, this cannot be done because a teacher has to follow the curriculum of the school. Secondly, with this educational option, parents can monitor their children's behaviour. These days, many children behave badly because they are affected by their peers. When children are at home with their parents, they can monitor them most of the time, and therefore, they will behave well.
To sum up, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that homeschooling should not be banned owing to its positive aspects. If homeschooled were promoted, children would not only perform well academically but also would have great personalities.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that homeschooling should be banned because it has several drawbacks. Others think that it has a number of benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
Some are of the opinion that homeschooling ought to be prohibited due to its disadvantages, whereas others believe that it has several advantages. In my opinion, I consider that homeschooling is a great educational method which can benefit both parents and students.
On the one hand, according to some, family-led education can result in a number of pitfalls. One of the main reasons is that when children are homeschooled, they will lack social skills. In other words, going to school gives students the opportunity to mix with other children which can undoubtedly help them to develop their communication skills. However, if children study at home, they will most likely be alone most of the time. This will clearly impact their personalities negatively. Another reason why some oppose the idea of homeschooling is that it can be costly. Although parents can teach their children at home, not all parents have the knowledge to teach all subjects to their children. As a result, they have to hire private tutors to teach their children. In this case, they have to spend a lot of money, and for those who have financial issues, this can definitely affect their budgets.
On the other hand, some people claim that home-based learning can bring about a number of merits, and I agree. Firstly, this educational method helps students learn effectively. That is to say, parents or tutors can slow the lesson based on their children' or students' performance. For instance, if students are weak in science, a teacher can slow down the lesson to ensure that they master the lesson effectively. Nevertheless, in a normal class, this cannot be done because a teacher has to follow the curriculum of the school. Secondly, with this educational option, parents can monitor their children's behaviour. These days, many children behave badly because they are affected by their peers. When children are at home with their parents, they can monitor them most of the time, and therefore, they will behave well.
To sum up, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that homeschooling should not be banned owing to its positive aspects. If homeschooled were promoted, children would not only perform well academically but also would have great personalities.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that homeschooling should be banned because it has several drawbacks. Others think that it has a number of benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
Some are of the opinion that homeschooling ought to be prohibited due to its disadvantages, whereas others believe that it has several advantages. In my opinion, I consider that homeschooling is a great educational method which can benefit both parents and students.
On the one hand, according to some, family-led education can result in a number of pitfalls. One of the main reasons is that when children are homeschooled, they will lack social skills. In other words, going to school gives students the opportunity to mix with other children which can undoubtedly help them to develop their communication skills. However, if children study at home, they will most likely be alone most of the time. This will clearly impact their personalities negatively. Another reason why some oppose the idea of homeschooling is that it can be costly. Although parents can teach their children at home, not all parents have the knowledge to teach all subjects to their children. As a result, they have to hire private tutors to teach their children. In this case, they have to spend a lot of money, and for those who have financial issues, this can definitely affect their budgets.
On the other hand, some people claim that home-based learning can bring about a number of merits, and I agree. Firstly, this educational method helps students learn effectively. That is to say, parents or tutors can slow the lesson based on their children' or students' performance. For instance, if students are weak in science, a teacher can slow down the lesson to ensure that they master the lesson effectively. Nevertheless, in a normal class, this cannot be done because a teacher has to follow the curriculum of the school. Secondly, with this educational option, parents can monitor their children's behaviour. These days, many children behave badly because they are affected by their peers. When children are at home with their parents, they can monitor them most of the time, and therefore, they will behave well.
To sum up, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that homeschooling should not be banned owing to its positive aspects. If homeschooled were promoted, children would not only perform well academically but also would have great personalities.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that it is the best to save money, for exemple in a bank or savings scheme. Other people feel that money should be spent whenever it is available. Discuss these views and reach on opinion on this debate
Anwser:
At present, the bill continues to be a controversial topic, most individuals firmly believe that cash is saved via a bank or institution of capital, however, others feel capital ought to be spent if it is available. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
Arguably, there could be reasons why cash is spent on relaxation or enjoyment. Initially, many people are so keen on shopping or taking holidays as a result they desire to allocate checks for the purpose of their demand and there is certainly some truth in this. Withnotstanding poor activity of inhabitants, mostly they expend checks instead of saving, in order to their family live temporarily relax because they once come to activity. Owing to food, housing, and transport, they do not save pay by which I mean that there are numerous expenditures in people’s lives. Alternatively spending pay on products and services boosts the economy and creates employment, and this action yields a lot of advantages.
Foremost among other challenges appears to be more issues of world condition. This point is first, if people save property through a bank or savings scheme, they will earn payment I mean they can obtain discounts from the bank because their pay yields plus cash. Furthermore, individuals, who emphasise the need to accumulate wealth during one’s lifetime, so that one’s children inherit pay or property which will increase their security and standard of living. Due to catastrophic growth, they may quit their job and they utilize the money for activity purposes such as food or studying for their youngsters, for instance, in the USA, the government legislated laws in regard to saving property for its folk, hence inhabitants of the USA are rich.
In a nutshell, I tend to completely agree that it is wiser to save salary wherever possible, for reasons which benefit both individuals today and future generations.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that it is the best to save money, for exemple in a bank or savings scheme. Other people feel that money should be spent whenever it is available. Discuss these views and reach on opinion on this debate
Anwser:
At present, the bill continues to be a controversial topic, most individuals firmly believe that cash is saved via a bank or institution of capital, however, others feel capital ought to be spent if it is available. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
Arguably, there could be reasons why cash is spent on relaxation or enjoyment. Initially, many people are so keen on shopping or taking holidays as a result they desire to allocate checks for the purpose of their demand and there is certainly some truth in this. Withnotstanding poor activity of inhabitants, mostly they expend checks instead of saving, in order to their family live temporarily relax because they once come to activity. Owing to food, housing, and transport, they do not save pay by which I mean that there are numerous expenditures in people’s lives. Alternatively spending pay on products and services boosts the economy and creates employment, and this action yields a lot of advantages.
Foremost among other challenges appears to be more issues of world condition. This point is first, if people save property through a bank or savings scheme, they will earn payment I mean they can obtain discounts from the bank because their pay yields plus cash. Furthermore, individuals, who emphasise the need to accumulate wealth during one’s lifetime, so that one’s children inherit pay or property which will increase their security and standard of living. Due to catastrophic growth, they may quit their job and they utilize the money for activity purposes such as food or studying for their youngsters, for instance, in the USA, the government legislated laws in regard to saving property for its folk, hence inhabitants of the USA are rich.
In a nutshell, I tend to completely agree that it is wiser to save salary wherever possible, for reasons which benefit both individuals today and future generations.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that it is the best to save money, for exemple in a bank or savings scheme. Other people feel that money should be spent whenever it is available. Discuss these views and reach on opinion on this debate
Anwser:
At present, the bill continues to be a controversial topic, most individuals firmly believe that cash is saved via a bank or institution of capital, however, others feel capital ought to be spent if it is available. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
Arguably, there could be reasons why cash is spent on relaxation or enjoyment. Initially, many people are so keen on shopping or taking holidays as a result they desire to allocate checks for the purpose of their demand and there is certainly some truth in this. Withnotstanding poor activity of inhabitants, mostly they expend checks instead of saving, in order to their family live temporarily relax because they once come to activity. Owing to food, housing, and transport, they do not save pay by which I mean that there are numerous expenditures in people’s lives. Alternatively spending pay on products and services boosts the economy and creates employment, and this action yields a lot of advantages.
Foremost among other challenges appears to be more issues of world condition. This point is first, if people save property through a bank or savings scheme, they will earn payment I mean they can obtain discounts from the bank because their pay yields plus cash. Furthermore, individuals, who emphasise the need to accumulate wealth during one’s lifetime, so that one’s children inherit pay or property which will increase their security and standard of living. Due to catastrophic growth, they may quit their job and they utilize the money for activity purposes such as food or studying for their youngsters, for instance, in the USA, the government legislated laws in regard to saving property for its folk, hence inhabitants of the USA are rich.
In a nutshell, I tend to completely agree that it is wiser to save salary wherever possible, for reasons which benefit both individuals today and future generations.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that it is the best to save money, for exemple in a bank or savings scheme. Other people feel that money should be spent whenever it is available. Discuss these views and reach on opinion on this debate
Anwser:
At present, the bill continues to be a controversial topic, most individuals firmly believe that cash is saved via a bank or institution of capital, however, others feel capital ought to be spent if it is available. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
Arguably, there could be reasons why cash is spent on relaxation or enjoyment. Initially, many people are so keen on shopping or taking holidays as a result they desire to allocate checks for the purpose of their demand and there is certainly some truth in this. Withnotstanding poor activity of inhabitants, mostly they expend checks instead of saving, in order to their family live temporarily relax because they once come to activity. Owing to food, housing, and transport, they do not save pay by which I mean that there are numerous expenditures in people’s lives. Alternatively spending pay on products and services boosts the economy and creates employment, and this action yields a lot of advantages.
Foremost among other challenges appears to be more issues of world condition. This point is first, if people save property through a bank or savings scheme, they will earn payment I mean they can obtain discounts from the bank because their pay yields plus cash. Furthermore, individuals, who emphasise the need to accumulate wealth during one’s lifetime, so that one’s children inherit pay or property which will increase their security and standard of living. Due to catastrophic growth, they may quit their job and they utilize the money for activity purposes such as food or studying for their youngsters, for instance, in the USA, the government legislated laws in regard to saving property for its folk, hence inhabitants of the USA are rich.
In a nutshell, I tend to completely agree that it is wiser to save salary wherever possible, for reasons which benefit both individuals today and future generations.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that it is the best to save money, for exemple in a bank or savings scheme. Other people feel that money should be spent whenever it is available. Discuss these views and reach on opinion on this debate
Anwser:
At present, the bill continues to be a controversial topic, most individuals firmly believe that cash is saved via a bank or institution of capital, however, others feel capital ought to be spent if it is available. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
Arguably, there could be reasons why cash is spent on relaxation or enjoyment. Initially, many people are so keen on shopping or taking holidays as a result they desire to allocate checks for the purpose of their demand and there is certainly some truth in this. Withnotstanding poor activity of inhabitants, mostly they expend checks instead of saving, in order to their family live temporarily relax because they once come to activity. Owing to food, housing, and transport, they do not save pay by which I mean that there are numerous expenditures in people’s lives. Alternatively spending pay on products and services boosts the economy and creates employment, and this action yields a lot of advantages.
Foremost among other challenges appears to be more issues of world condition. This point is first, if people save property through a bank or savings scheme, they will earn payment I mean they can obtain discounts from the bank because their pay yields plus cash. Furthermore, individuals, who emphasise the need to accumulate wealth during one’s lifetime, so that one’s children inherit pay or property which will increase their security and standard of living. Due to catastrophic growth, they may quit their job and they utilize the money for activity purposes such as food or studying for their youngsters, for instance, in the USA, the government legislated laws in regard to saving property for its folk, hence inhabitants of the USA are rich.
In a nutshell, I tend to completely agree that it is wiser to save salary wherever possible, for reasons which benefit both individuals today and future generations.
| Your grammatical range score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that it is the best to save money, for exemple in a bank or savings scheme. Other people feel that money should be spent whenever it is available. Discuss these views and reach on opinion on this debate
Anwser:
At present, the bill continues to be a controversial topic, most individuals firmly believe that cash is saved via a bank or institution of capital, however, others feel capital ought to be spent if it is available. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
Arguably, there could be reasons why cash is spent on relaxation or enjoyment. Initially, many people are so keen on shopping or taking holidays as a result they desire to allocate checks for the purpose of their demand and there is certainly some truth in this. Withnotstanding poor activity of inhabitants, mostly they expend checks instead of saving, in order to their family live temporarily relax because they once come to activity. Owing to food, housing, and transport, they do not save pay by which I mean that there are numerous expenditures in people’s lives. Alternatively spending pay on products and services boosts the economy and creates employment, and this action yields a lot of advantages.
Foremost among other challenges appears to be more issues of world condition. This point is first, if people save property through a bank or savings scheme, they will earn payment I mean they can obtain discounts from the bank because their pay yields plus cash. Furthermore, individuals, who emphasise the need to accumulate wealth during one’s lifetime, so that one’s children inherit pay or property which will increase their security and standard of living. Due to catastrophic growth, they may quit their job and they utilize the money for activity purposes such as food or studying for their youngsters, for instance, in the USA, the government legislated laws in regard to saving property for its folk, hence inhabitants of the USA are rich.
In a nutshell, I tend to completely agree that it is wiser to save salary wherever possible, for reasons which benefit both individuals today and future generations.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that it is the best to save money, for exemple in a bank or savings scheme. Other people feel that money should be spent whenever it is available. Discuss these views and reach on opinion on this debate
Anwser:
At present, the bill continues to be a controversial topic, most individuals firmly believe that cash is saved via a bank or institution of capital, however, others feel capital ought to be spent if it is available. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
Arguably, there could be reasons why cash is spent on relaxation or enjoyment. Initially, many people are so keen on shopping or taking holidays as a result they desire to allocate checks for the purpose of their demand and there is certainly some truth in this. Withnotstanding poor activity of inhabitants, mostly they expend checks instead of saving, in order to their family live temporarily relax because they once come to activity. Owing to food, housing, and transport, they do not save pay by which I mean that there are numerous expenditures in people’s lives. Alternatively spending pay on products and services boosts the economy and creates employment, and this action yields a lot of advantages.
Foremost among other challenges appears to be more issues of world condition. This point is first, if people save property through a bank or savings scheme, they will earn payment I mean they can obtain discounts from the bank because their pay yields plus cash. Furthermore, individuals, who emphasise the need to accumulate wealth during one’s lifetime, so that one’s children inherit pay or property which will increase their security and standard of living. Due to catastrophic growth, they may quit their job and they utilize the money for activity purposes such as food or studying for their youngsters, for instance, in the USA, the government legislated laws in regard to saving property for its folk, hence inhabitants of the USA are rich.
In a nutshell, I tend to completely agree that it is wiser to save salary wherever possible, for reasons which benefit both individuals today and future generations.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that it is the best to save money, for exemple in a bank or savings scheme. Other people feel that money should be spent whenever it is available. Discuss these views and reach on opinion on this debate
Anwser:
At present, the bill continues to be a controversial topic, most individuals firmly believe that cash is saved via a bank or institution of capital, however, others feel capital ought to be spent if it is available. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss now.
Arguably, there could be reasons why cash is spent on relaxation or enjoyment. Initially, many people are so keen on shopping or taking holidays as a result they desire to allocate checks for the purpose of their demand and there is certainly some truth in this. Withnotstanding poor activity of inhabitants, mostly they expend checks instead of saving, in order to their family live temporarily relax because they once come to activity. Owing to food, housing, and transport, they do not save pay by which I mean that there are numerous expenditures in people’s lives. Alternatively spending pay on products and services boosts the economy and creates employment, and this action yields a lot of advantages.
Foremost among other challenges appears to be more issues of world condition. This point is first, if people save property through a bank or savings scheme, they will earn payment I mean they can obtain discounts from the bank because their pay yields plus cash. Furthermore, individuals, who emphasise the need to accumulate wealth during one’s lifetime, so that one’s children inherit pay or property which will increase their security and standard of living. Due to catastrophic growth, they may quit their job and they utilize the money for activity purposes such as food or studying for their youngsters, for instance, in the USA, the government legislated laws in regard to saving property for its folk, hence inhabitants of the USA are rich.
In a nutshell, I tend to completely agree that it is wiser to save salary wherever possible, for reasons which benefit both individuals today and future generations.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Successful companies use advertisement to make more sales. What can make an advertisement very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society?
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an increasing number of advertisements in order to increase the companies' sales. In my view, this trend should be perceived as a negative trend. In this essay, I will propose some strategies to make valuable advertisements and some reasons for their bad influence.
To begin with, in this modern era, artists play an important role in business. They introduce products and increase the sales of the product easily. It will be beneficial for companies to hire artists in order to advertise their products. It will attract many people to buy the product. For instance, body lotions are sold within 15 minutes after the artists use the product on their skins. As a result, the companies gain more profit. The next strategy is to make an advertisement on online media. Many people now have social media both in urban areas and rural areas. They tend to spend more than 4 hours accessing social platforms. By advertising on social media, many people can get information about the products. Consequently, the products become well-known among the society.
However, this trend can have bad effects on society. The main effect is people are becoming wasteful. By having the artists in advertisements, youngsters can be influenced to buy the products easily even though they do not need the products. They believe that having the same common goods with artists will make them look cool among their friends. This attitude will lead them to become impulsive buyers. The following effect is dressing unsuitable for their ages. Many people are influenced by the way their idols dress. The advertisements that show up on social platforms can make people dress unsuitable for their ages. They want to imitate their idols in online advertisements. For illustration, students dress sexy because they want to look like their idols. It will be harmful to the students as it can put them in dangerous situations such as sexual violence or being kidnapped by strangers.
To sum up, this essay examines the way of making valuable advertisements and the potential drawbacks of their influence. Having considered the cons, therefore I am firmly convinced that advertisement can only be seen as a negative influence on society.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Successful companies use advertisement to make more sales. What can make an advertisement very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society?
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an increasing number of advertisements in order to increase the companies' sales. In my view, this trend should be perceived as a negative trend. In this essay, I will propose some strategies to make valuable advertisements and some reasons for their bad influence.
To begin with, in this modern era, artists play an important role in business. They introduce products and increase the sales of the product easily. It will be beneficial for companies to hire artists in order to advertise their products. It will attract many people to buy the product. For instance, body lotions are sold within 15 minutes after the artists use the product on their skins. As a result, the companies gain more profit. The next strategy is to make an advertisement on online media. Many people now have social media both in urban areas and rural areas. They tend to spend more than 4 hours accessing social platforms. By advertising on social media, many people can get information about the products. Consequently, the products become well-known among the society.
However, this trend can have bad effects on society. The main effect is people are becoming wasteful. By having the artists in advertisements, youngsters can be influenced to buy the products easily even though they do not need the products. They believe that having the same common goods with artists will make them look cool among their friends. This attitude will lead them to become impulsive buyers. The following effect is dressing unsuitable for their ages. Many people are influenced by the way their idols dress. The advertisements that show up on social platforms can make people dress unsuitable for their ages. They want to imitate their idols in online advertisements. For illustration, students dress sexy because they want to look like their idols. It will be harmful to the students as it can put them in dangerous situations such as sexual violence or being kidnapped by strangers.
To sum up, this essay examines the way of making valuable advertisements and the potential drawbacks of their influence. Having considered the cons, therefore I am firmly convinced that advertisement can only be seen as a negative influence on society.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Successful companies use advertisement to make more sales. What can make an advertisement very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society?
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an increasing number of advertisements in order to increase the companies' sales. In my view, this trend should be perceived as a negative trend. In this essay, I will propose some strategies to make valuable advertisements and some reasons for their bad influence.
To begin with, in this modern era, artists play an important role in business. They introduce products and increase the sales of the product easily. It will be beneficial for companies to hire artists in order to advertise their products. It will attract many people to buy the product. For instance, body lotions are sold within 15 minutes after the artists use the product on their skins. As a result, the companies gain more profit. The next strategy is to make an advertisement on online media. Many people now have social media both in urban areas and rural areas. They tend to spend more than 4 hours accessing social platforms. By advertising on social media, many people can get information about the products. Consequently, the products become well-known among the society.
However, this trend can have bad effects on society. The main effect is people are becoming wasteful. By having the artists in advertisements, youngsters can be influenced to buy the products easily even though they do not need the products. They believe that having the same common goods with artists will make them look cool among their friends. This attitude will lead them to become impulsive buyers. The following effect is dressing unsuitable for their ages. Many people are influenced by the way their idols dress. The advertisements that show up on social platforms can make people dress unsuitable for their ages. They want to imitate their idols in online advertisements. For illustration, students dress sexy because they want to look like their idols. It will be harmful to the students as it can put them in dangerous situations such as sexual violence or being kidnapped by strangers.
To sum up, this essay examines the way of making valuable advertisements and the potential drawbacks of their influence. Having considered the cons, therefore I am firmly convinced that advertisement can only be seen as a negative influence on society.
| Your lexical resource score is 6.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Successful companies use advertisement to make more sales. What can make an advertisement very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society?
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an increasing number of advertisements in order to increase the companies' sales. In my view, this trend should be perceived as a negative trend. In this essay, I will propose some strategies to make valuable advertisements and some reasons for their bad influence.
To begin with, in this modern era, artists play an important role in business. They introduce products and increase the sales of the product easily. It will be beneficial for companies to hire artists in order to advertise their products. It will attract many people to buy the product. For instance, body lotions are sold within 15 minutes after the artists use the product on their skins. As a result, the companies gain more profit. The next strategy is to make an advertisement on online media. Many people now have social media both in urban areas and rural areas. They tend to spend more than 4 hours accessing social platforms. By advertising on social media, many people can get information about the products. Consequently, the products become well-known among the society.
However, this trend can have bad effects on society. The main effect is people are becoming wasteful. By having the artists in advertisements, youngsters can be influenced to buy the products easily even though they do not need the products. They believe that having the same common goods with artists will make them look cool among their friends. This attitude will lead them to become impulsive buyers. The following effect is dressing unsuitable for their ages. Many people are influenced by the way their idols dress. The advertisements that show up on social platforms can make people dress unsuitable for their ages. They want to imitate their idols in online advertisements. For illustration, students dress sexy because they want to look like their idols. It will be harmful to the students as it can put them in dangerous situations such as sexual violence or being kidnapped by strangers.
To sum up, this essay examines the way of making valuable advertisements and the potential drawbacks of their influence. Having considered the cons, therefore I am firmly convinced that advertisement can only be seen as a negative influence on society.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 6.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Successful companies use advertisement to make more sales. What can make an advertisement very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society?
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an increasing number of advertisements in order to increase the companies' sales. In my view, this trend should be perceived as a negative trend. In this essay, I will propose some strategies to make valuable advertisements and some reasons for their bad influence.
To begin with, in this modern era, artists play an important role in business. They introduce products and increase the sales of the product easily. It will be beneficial for companies to hire artists in order to advertise their products. It will attract many people to buy the product. For instance, body lotions are sold within 15 minutes after the artists use the product on their skins. As a result, the companies gain more profit. The next strategy is to make an advertisement on online media. Many people now have social media both in urban areas and rural areas. They tend to spend more than 4 hours accessing social platforms. By advertising on social media, many people can get information about the products. Consequently, the products become well-known among the society.
However, this trend can have bad effects on society. The main effect is people are becoming wasteful. By having the artists in advertisements, youngsters can be influenced to buy the products easily even though they do not need the products. They believe that having the same common goods with artists will make them look cool among their friends. This attitude will lead them to become impulsive buyers. The following effect is dressing unsuitable for their ages. Many people are influenced by the way their idols dress. The advertisements that show up on social platforms can make people dress unsuitable for their ages. They want to imitate their idols in online advertisements. For illustration, students dress sexy because they want to look like their idols. It will be harmful to the students as it can put them in dangerous situations such as sexual violence or being kidnapped by strangers.
To sum up, this essay examines the way of making valuable advertisements and the potential drawbacks of their influence. Having considered the cons, therefore I am firmly convinced that advertisement can only be seen as a negative influence on society.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Successful companies use advertisement to make more sales. What can make an advertisement very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society?
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an increasing number of advertisements in order to increase the companies' sales. In my view, this trend should be perceived as a negative trend. In this essay, I will propose some strategies to make valuable advertisements and some reasons for their bad influence.
To begin with, in this modern era, artists play an important role in business. They introduce products and increase the sales of the product easily. It will be beneficial for companies to hire artists in order to advertise their products. It will attract many people to buy the product. For instance, body lotions are sold within 15 minutes after the artists use the product on their skins. As a result, the companies gain more profit. The next strategy is to make an advertisement on online media. Many people now have social media both in urban areas and rural areas. They tend to spend more than 4 hours accessing social platforms. By advertising on social media, many people can get information about the products. Consequently, the products become well-known among the society.
However, this trend can have bad effects on society. The main effect is people are becoming wasteful. By having the artists in advertisements, youngsters can be influenced to buy the products easily even though they do not need the products. They believe that having the same common goods with artists will make them look cool among their friends. This attitude will lead them to become impulsive buyers. The following effect is dressing unsuitable for their ages. Many people are influenced by the way their idols dress. The advertisements that show up on social platforms can make people dress unsuitable for their ages. They want to imitate their idols in online advertisements. For illustration, students dress sexy because they want to look like their idols. It will be harmful to the students as it can put them in dangerous situations such as sexual violence or being kidnapped by strangers.
To sum up, this essay examines the way of making valuable advertisements and the potential drawbacks of their influence. Having considered the cons, therefore I am firmly convinced that advertisement can only be seen as a negative influence on society.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Successful companies use advertisement to make more sales. What can make an advertisement very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society?
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an increasing number of advertisements in order to increase the companies' sales. In my view, this trend should be perceived as a negative trend. In this essay, I will propose some strategies to make valuable advertisements and some reasons for their bad influence.
To begin with, in this modern era, artists play an important role in business. They introduce products and increase the sales of the product easily. It will be beneficial for companies to hire artists in order to advertise their products. It will attract many people to buy the product. For instance, body lotions are sold within 15 minutes after the artists use the product on their skins. As a result, the companies gain more profit. The next strategy is to make an advertisement on online media. Many people now have social media both in urban areas and rural areas. They tend to spend more than 4 hours accessing social platforms. By advertising on social media, many people can get information about the products. Consequently, the products become well-known among the society.
However, this trend can have bad effects on society. The main effect is people are becoming wasteful. By having the artists in advertisements, youngsters can be influenced to buy the products easily even though they do not need the products. They believe that having the same common goods with artists will make them look cool among their friends. This attitude will lead them to become impulsive buyers. The following effect is dressing unsuitable for their ages. Many people are influenced by the way their idols dress. The advertisements that show up on social platforms can make people dress unsuitable for their ages. They want to imitate their idols in online advertisements. For illustration, students dress sexy because they want to look like their idols. It will be harmful to the students as it can put them in dangerous situations such as sexual violence or being kidnapped by strangers.
To sum up, this essay examines the way of making valuable advertisements and the potential drawbacks of their influence. Having considered the cons, therefore I am firmly convinced that advertisement can only be seen as a negative influence on society.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Successful companies use advertisement to make more sales. What can make an advertisement very effective? Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society?
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an increasing number of advertisements in order to increase the companies' sales. In my view, this trend should be perceived as a negative trend. In this essay, I will propose some strategies to make valuable advertisements and some reasons for their bad influence.
To begin with, in this modern era, artists play an important role in business. They introduce products and increase the sales of the product easily. It will be beneficial for companies to hire artists in order to advertise their products. It will attract many people to buy the product. For instance, body lotions are sold within 15 minutes after the artists use the product on their skins. As a result, the companies gain more profit. The next strategy is to make an advertisement on online media. Many people now have social media both in urban areas and rural areas. They tend to spend more than 4 hours accessing social platforms. By advertising on social media, many people can get information about the products. Consequently, the products become well-known among the society.
However, this trend can have bad effects on society. The main effect is people are becoming wasteful. By having the artists in advertisements, youngsters can be influenced to buy the products easily even though they do not need the products. They believe that having the same common goods with artists will make them look cool among their friends. This attitude will lead them to become impulsive buyers. The following effect is dressing unsuitable for their ages. Many people are influenced by the way their idols dress. The advertisements that show up on social platforms can make people dress unsuitable for their ages. They want to imitate their idols in online advertisements. For illustration, students dress sexy because they want to look like their idols. It will be harmful to the students as it can put them in dangerous situations such as sexual violence or being kidnapped by strangers.
To sum up, this essay examines the way of making valuable advertisements and the potential drawbacks of their influence. Having considered the cons, therefore I am firmly convinced that advertisement can only be seen as a negative influence on society.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibiliry.
What are your opinions on this?
Anwser:
Nowadays, more and more adolescents are working for salaries or to maintain job skills, however, some individuals claim that is totally wrong while others say it is valuable to job experience, necessary for discipline and educating. This essay will provide my own opinion with relevant examples leading to the second community.
To begin with, there are many reasons to criticize young age students who are working. Nonetheless, by this, learners can get job experience sooner, than their peers. For example, employers always ask future employees about their job experience, even if the participant has graduated from university, giving their preference to the person who has experience and high results. In addition, bosses ask for work knowledge for at least 3 or 5 years, for that reason many young teenagers work from their childhood. Furthermore, scholars have the opportunity to get high-paying jobs sooner than others and get high demand from big companies that are searching for professionals with high basic knowledge.
Additionally, children are becoming more disciplined and are able to take more responsibilities for themselves. Consequently, the person will become more independent and will have more confidence in the job atmosphere in the future. For instance, current research made by the National American University of Psychology showed that young age attendees appreciate and divide finances more correctly, as a result, having greater chances to achieve financial success. Moreover, many families have financial problems situations, where children are forced to work and provide vital things to the house, especially in third-world countries or disadvantaged households.
In summary, working at a young age provides many advantages in adulthood, it is definitely worth it, even if seems hard and “bad” for youngsters.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibiliry.
What are your opinions on this?
Anwser:
Nowadays, more and more adolescents are working for salaries or to maintain job skills, however, some individuals claim that is totally wrong while others say it is valuable to job experience, necessary for discipline and educating. This essay will provide my own opinion with relevant examples leading to the second community.
To begin with, there are many reasons to criticize young age students who are working. Nonetheless, by this, learners can get job experience sooner, than their peers. For example, employers always ask future employees about their job experience, even if the participant has graduated from university, giving their preference to the person who has experience and high results. In addition, bosses ask for work knowledge for at least 3 or 5 years, for that reason many young teenagers work from their childhood. Furthermore, scholars have the opportunity to get high-paying jobs sooner than others and get high demand from big companies that are searching for professionals with high basic knowledge.
Additionally, children are becoming more disciplined and are able to take more responsibilities for themselves. Consequently, the person will become more independent and will have more confidence in the job atmosphere in the future. For instance, current research made by the National American University of Psychology showed that young age attendees appreciate and divide finances more correctly, as a result, having greater chances to achieve financial success. Moreover, many families have financial problems situations, where children are forced to work and provide vital things to the house, especially in third-world countries or disadvantaged households.
In summary, working at a young age provides many advantages in adulthood, it is definitely worth it, even if seems hard and “bad” for youngsters.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibiliry.
What are your opinions on this?
Anwser:
Nowadays, more and more adolescents are working for salaries or to maintain job skills, however, some individuals claim that is totally wrong while others say it is valuable to job experience, necessary for discipline and educating. This essay will provide my own opinion with relevant examples leading to the second community.
To begin with, there are many reasons to criticize young age students who are working. Nonetheless, by this, learners can get job experience sooner, than their peers. For example, employers always ask future employees about their job experience, even if the participant has graduated from university, giving their preference to the person who has experience and high results. In addition, bosses ask for work knowledge for at least 3 or 5 years, for that reason many young teenagers work from their childhood. Furthermore, scholars have the opportunity to get high-paying jobs sooner than others and get high demand from big companies that are searching for professionals with high basic knowledge.
Additionally, children are becoming more disciplined and are able to take more responsibilities for themselves. Consequently, the person will become more independent and will have more confidence in the job atmosphere in the future. For instance, current research made by the National American University of Psychology showed that young age attendees appreciate and divide finances more correctly, as a result, having greater chances to achieve financial success. Moreover, many families have financial problems situations, where children are forced to work and provide vital things to the house, especially in third-world countries or disadvantaged households.
In summary, working at a young age provides many advantages in adulthood, it is definitely worth it, even if seems hard and “bad” for youngsters.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibiliry.
What are your opinions on this?
Anwser:
Nowadays, more and more adolescents are working for salaries or to maintain job skills, however, some individuals claim that is totally wrong while others say it is valuable to job experience, necessary for discipline and educating. This essay will provide my own opinion with relevant examples leading to the second community.
To begin with, there are many reasons to criticize young age students who are working. Nonetheless, by this, learners can get job experience sooner, than their peers. For example, employers always ask future employees about their job experience, even if the participant has graduated from university, giving their preference to the person who has experience and high results. In addition, bosses ask for work knowledge for at least 3 or 5 years, for that reason many young teenagers work from their childhood. Furthermore, scholars have the opportunity to get high-paying jobs sooner than others and get high demand from big companies that are searching for professionals with high basic knowledge.
Additionally, children are becoming more disciplined and are able to take more responsibilities for themselves. Consequently, the person will become more independent and will have more confidence in the job atmosphere in the future. For instance, current research made by the National American University of Psychology showed that young age attendees appreciate and divide finances more correctly, as a result, having greater chances to achieve financial success. Moreover, many families have financial problems situations, where children are forced to work and provide vital things to the house, especially in third-world countries or disadvantaged households.
In summary, working at a young age provides many advantages in adulthood, it is definitely worth it, even if seems hard and “bad” for youngsters.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibiliry.
What are your opinions on this?
Anwser:
Nowadays, more and more adolescents are working for salaries or to maintain job skills, however, some individuals claim that is totally wrong while others say it is valuable to job experience, necessary for discipline and educating. This essay will provide my own opinion with relevant examples leading to the second community.
To begin with, there are many reasons to criticize young age students who are working. Nonetheless, by this, learners can get job experience sooner, than their peers. For example, employers always ask future employees about their job experience, even if the participant has graduated from university, giving their preference to the person who has experience and high results. In addition, bosses ask for work knowledge for at least 3 or 5 years, for that reason many young teenagers work from their childhood. Furthermore, scholars have the opportunity to get high-paying jobs sooner than others and get high demand from big companies that are searching for professionals with high basic knowledge.
Additionally, children are becoming more disciplined and are able to take more responsibilities for themselves. Consequently, the person will become more independent and will have more confidence in the job atmosphere in the future. For instance, current research made by the National American University of Psychology showed that young age attendees appreciate and divide finances more correctly, as a result, having greater chances to achieve financial success. Moreover, many families have financial problems situations, where children are forced to work and provide vital things to the house, especially in third-world countries or disadvantaged households.
In summary, working at a young age provides many advantages in adulthood, it is definitely worth it, even if seems hard and “bad” for youngsters.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibiliry.
What are your opinions on this?
Anwser:
Nowadays, more and more adolescents are working for salaries or to maintain job skills, however, some individuals claim that is totally wrong while others say it is valuable to job experience, necessary for discipline and educating. This essay will provide my own opinion with relevant examples leading to the second community.
To begin with, there are many reasons to criticize young age students who are working. Nonetheless, by this, learners can get job experience sooner, than their peers. For example, employers always ask future employees about their job experience, even if the participant has graduated from university, giving their preference to the person who has experience and high results. In addition, bosses ask for work knowledge for at least 3 or 5 years, for that reason many young teenagers work from their childhood. Furthermore, scholars have the opportunity to get high-paying jobs sooner than others and get high demand from big companies that are searching for professionals with high basic knowledge.
Additionally, children are becoming more disciplined and are able to take more responsibilities for themselves. Consequently, the person will become more independent and will have more confidence in the job atmosphere in the future. For instance, current research made by the National American University of Psychology showed that young age attendees appreciate and divide finances more correctly, as a result, having greater chances to achieve financial success. Moreover, many families have financial problems situations, where children are forced to work and provide vital things to the house, especially in third-world countries or disadvantaged households.
In summary, working at a young age provides many advantages in adulthood, it is definitely worth it, even if seems hard and “bad” for youngsters.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibiliry.
What are your opinions on this?
Anwser:
Nowadays, more and more adolescents are working for salaries or to maintain job skills, however, some individuals claim that is totally wrong while others say it is valuable to job experience, necessary for discipline and educating. This essay will provide my own opinion with relevant examples leading to the second community.
To begin with, there are many reasons to criticize young age students who are working. Nonetheless, by this, learners can get job experience sooner, than their peers. For example, employers always ask future employees about their job experience, even if the participant has graduated from university, giving their preference to the person who has experience and high results. In addition, bosses ask for work knowledge for at least 3 or 5 years, for that reason many young teenagers work from their childhood. Furthermore, scholars have the opportunity to get high-paying jobs sooner than others and get high demand from big companies that are searching for professionals with high basic knowledge.
Additionally, children are becoming more disciplined and are able to take more responsibilities for themselves. Consequently, the person will become more independent and will have more confidence in the job atmosphere in the future. For instance, current research made by the National American University of Psychology showed that young age attendees appreciate and divide finances more correctly, as a result, having greater chances to achieve financial success. Moreover, many families have financial problems situations, where children are forced to work and provide vital things to the house, especially in third-world countries or disadvantaged households.
In summary, working at a young age provides many advantages in adulthood, it is definitely worth it, even if seems hard and “bad” for youngsters.
| Your task achievement score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibiliry.
What are your opinions on this?
Anwser:
Nowadays, more and more adolescents are working for salaries or to maintain job skills, however, some individuals claim that is totally wrong while others say it is valuable to job experience, necessary for discipline and educating. This essay will provide my own opinion with relevant examples leading to the second community.
To begin with, there are many reasons to criticize young age students who are working. Nonetheless, by this, learners can get job experience sooner, than their peers. For example, employers always ask future employees about their job experience, even if the participant has graduated from university, giving their preference to the person who has experience and high results. In addition, bosses ask for work knowledge for at least 3 or 5 years, for that reason many young teenagers work from their childhood. Furthermore, scholars have the opportunity to get high-paying jobs sooner than others and get high demand from big companies that are searching for professionals with high basic knowledge.
Additionally, children are becoming more disciplined and are able to take more responsibilities for themselves. Consequently, the person will become more independent and will have more confidence in the job atmosphere in the future. For instance, current research made by the National American University of Psychology showed that young age attendees appreciate and divide finances more correctly, as a result, having greater chances to achieve financial success. Moreover, many families have financial problems situations, where children are forced to work and provide vital things to the house, especially in third-world countries or disadvantaged households.
In summary, working at a young age provides many advantages in adulthood, it is definitely worth it, even if seems hard and “bad” for youngsters.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
In today's world, a huge number of jobs other than requesting enough skills in the main subject, require basic knowledge about another subject. This trend has made the students want to study additional subjects in universities. Although others think they must concentrate on their main major and it prevents them from focusing 100% on their subject, in my opinion, it is a necessity to learn today's job requirements to enter the workplace more easily.
To begin with, what is an advantage for students in the workplace is having another skill related to their main ability which able them to focus on the work which most people are not able to do. It gives them more job opportunities and a higher chance of finding suitable work.For instance, with the advances in technology, a noticeable number of works require computer skills which forces students to learn them through their study.
On the contrary, some individuals' concern is that student's performance in their main major might be bred by the minor course. It can result in a lack of skills in the main major and a huge loss in the future as well. Moreover, the minor subject may be completely irrelevant in their future and all the efforts they put in might be time-wasting for them. For example, today, learning fundamentals of AI is meaningfully popular among students because of the huge advertisement however, most of them will not use it in the future and they just miss their chance to improve themselves in relevant required skills in their job.
To conclude, it is argued among people whether studying a minor subject in university is an effective plan or not. In my opinion, it gives them an advantage in the workplace while some individuals believe it is highly likely a waste of time and they should focus on their main subject.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
In today's world, a huge number of jobs other than requesting enough skills in the main subject, require basic knowledge about another subject. This trend has made the students want to study additional subjects in universities. Although others think they must concentrate on their main major and it prevents them from focusing 100% on their subject, in my opinion, it is a necessity to learn today's job requirements to enter the workplace more easily.
To begin with, what is an advantage for students in the workplace is having another skill related to their main ability which able them to focus on the work which most people are not able to do. It gives them more job opportunities and a higher chance of finding suitable work.For instance, with the advances in technology, a noticeable number of works require computer skills which forces students to learn them through their study.
On the contrary, some individuals' concern is that student's performance in their main major might be bred by the minor course. It can result in a lack of skills in the main major and a huge loss in the future as well. Moreover, the minor subject may be completely irrelevant in their future and all the efforts they put in might be time-wasting for them. For example, today, learning fundamentals of AI is meaningfully popular among students because of the huge advertisement however, most of them will not use it in the future and they just miss their chance to improve themselves in relevant required skills in their job.
To conclude, it is argued among people whether studying a minor subject in university is an effective plan or not. In my opinion, it gives them an advantage in the workplace while some individuals believe it is highly likely a waste of time and they should focus on their main subject.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
In today's world, a huge number of jobs other than requesting enough skills in the main subject, require basic knowledge about another subject. This trend has made the students want to study additional subjects in universities. Although others think they must concentrate on their main major and it prevents them from focusing 100% on their subject, in my opinion, it is a necessity to learn today's job requirements to enter the workplace more easily.
To begin with, what is an advantage for students in the workplace is having another skill related to their main ability which able them to focus on the work which most people are not able to do. It gives them more job opportunities and a higher chance of finding suitable work.For instance, with the advances in technology, a noticeable number of works require computer skills which forces students to learn them through their study.
On the contrary, some individuals' concern is that student's performance in their main major might be bred by the minor course. It can result in a lack of skills in the main major and a huge loss in the future as well. Moreover, the minor subject may be completely irrelevant in their future and all the efforts they put in might be time-wasting for them. For example, today, learning fundamentals of AI is meaningfully popular among students because of the huge advertisement however, most of them will not use it in the future and they just miss their chance to improve themselves in relevant required skills in their job.
To conclude, it is argued among people whether studying a minor subject in university is an effective plan or not. In my opinion, it gives them an advantage in the workplace while some individuals believe it is highly likely a waste of time and they should focus on their main subject.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
In today's world, a huge number of jobs other than requesting enough skills in the main subject, require basic knowledge about another subject. This trend has made the students want to study additional subjects in universities. Although others think they must concentrate on their main major and it prevents them from focusing 100% on their subject, in my opinion, it is a necessity to learn today's job requirements to enter the workplace more easily.
To begin with, what is an advantage for students in the workplace is having another skill related to their main ability which able them to focus on the work which most people are not able to do. It gives them more job opportunities and a higher chance of finding suitable work.For instance, with the advances in technology, a noticeable number of works require computer skills which forces students to learn them through their study.
On the contrary, some individuals' concern is that student's performance in their main major might be bred by the minor course. It can result in a lack of skills in the main major and a huge loss in the future as well. Moreover, the minor subject may be completely irrelevant in their future and all the efforts they put in might be time-wasting for them. For example, today, learning fundamentals of AI is meaningfully popular among students because of the huge advertisement however, most of them will not use it in the future and they just miss their chance to improve themselves in relevant required skills in their job.
To conclude, it is argued among people whether studying a minor subject in university is an effective plan or not. In my opinion, it gives them an advantage in the workplace while some individuals believe it is highly likely a waste of time and they should focus on their main subject.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
In today's world, a huge number of jobs other than requesting enough skills in the main subject, require basic knowledge about another subject. This trend has made the students want to study additional subjects in universities. Although others think they must concentrate on their main major and it prevents them from focusing 100% on their subject, in my opinion, it is a necessity to learn today's job requirements to enter the workplace more easily.
To begin with, what is an advantage for students in the workplace is having another skill related to their main ability which able them to focus on the work which most people are not able to do. It gives them more job opportunities and a higher chance of finding suitable work.For instance, with the advances in technology, a noticeable number of works require computer skills which forces students to learn them through their study.
On the contrary, some individuals' concern is that student's performance in their main major might be bred by the minor course. It can result in a lack of skills in the main major and a huge loss in the future as well. Moreover, the minor subject may be completely irrelevant in their future and all the efforts they put in might be time-wasting for them. For example, today, learning fundamentals of AI is meaningfully popular among students because of the huge advertisement however, most of them will not use it in the future and they just miss their chance to improve themselves in relevant required skills in their job.
To conclude, it is argued among people whether studying a minor subject in university is an effective plan or not. In my opinion, it gives them an advantage in the workplace while some individuals believe it is highly likely a waste of time and they should focus on their main subject.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
In today's world, a huge number of jobs other than requesting enough skills in the main subject, require basic knowledge about another subject. This trend has made the students want to study additional subjects in universities. Although others think they must concentrate on their main major and it prevents them from focusing 100% on their subject, in my opinion, it is a necessity to learn today's job requirements to enter the workplace more easily.
To begin with, what is an advantage for students in the workplace is having another skill related to their main ability which able them to focus on the work which most people are not able to do. It gives them more job opportunities and a higher chance of finding suitable work.For instance, with the advances in technology, a noticeable number of works require computer skills which forces students to learn them through their study.
On the contrary, some individuals' concern is that student's performance in their main major might be bred by the minor course. It can result in a lack of skills in the main major and a huge loss in the future as well. Moreover, the minor subject may be completely irrelevant in their future and all the efforts they put in might be time-wasting for them. For example, today, learning fundamentals of AI is meaningfully popular among students because of the huge advertisement however, most of them will not use it in the future and they just miss their chance to improve themselves in relevant required skills in their job.
To conclude, it is argued among people whether studying a minor subject in university is an effective plan or not. In my opinion, it gives them an advantage in the workplace while some individuals believe it is highly likely a waste of time and they should focus on their main subject.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
In today's world, a huge number of jobs other than requesting enough skills in the main subject, require basic knowledge about another subject. This trend has made the students want to study additional subjects in universities. Although others think they must concentrate on their main major and it prevents them from focusing 100% on their subject, in my opinion, it is a necessity to learn today's job requirements to enter the workplace more easily.
To begin with, what is an advantage for students in the workplace is having another skill related to their main ability which able them to focus on the work which most people are not able to do. It gives them more job opportunities and a higher chance of finding suitable work.For instance, with the advances in technology, a noticeable number of works require computer skills which forces students to learn them through their study.
On the contrary, some individuals' concern is that student's performance in their main major might be bred by the minor course. It can result in a lack of skills in the main major and a huge loss in the future as well. Moreover, the minor subject may be completely irrelevant in their future and all the efforts they put in might be time-wasting for them. For example, today, learning fundamentals of AI is meaningfully popular among students because of the huge advertisement however, most of them will not use it in the future and they just miss their chance to improve themselves in relevant required skills in their job.
To conclude, it is argued among people whether studying a minor subject in university is an effective plan or not. In my opinion, it gives them an advantage in the workplace while some individuals believe it is highly likely a waste of time and they should focus on their main subject.
| Your task achievement score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others feel it is important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
In today's world, a huge number of jobs other than requesting enough skills in the main subject, require basic knowledge about another subject. This trend has made the students want to study additional subjects in universities. Although others think they must concentrate on their main major and it prevents them from focusing 100% on their subject, in my opinion, it is a necessity to learn today's job requirements to enter the workplace more easily.
To begin with, what is an advantage for students in the workplace is having another skill related to their main ability which able them to focus on the work which most people are not able to do. It gives them more job opportunities and a higher chance of finding suitable work.For instance, with the advances in technology, a noticeable number of works require computer skills which forces students to learn them through their study.
On the contrary, some individuals' concern is that student's performance in their main major might be bred by the minor course. It can result in a lack of skills in the main major and a huge loss in the future as well. Moreover, the minor subject may be completely irrelevant in their future and all the efforts they put in might be time-wasting for them. For example, today, learning fundamentals of AI is meaningfully popular among students because of the huge advertisement however, most of them will not use it in the future and they just miss their chance to improve themselves in relevant required skills in their job.
To conclude, it is argued among people whether studying a minor subject in university is an effective plan or not. In my opinion, it gives them an advantage in the workplace while some individuals believe it is highly likely a waste of time and they should focus on their main subject.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? How to change their views?
Anwser:
The tendency of global tourism has created the concern of its negative impacts on a nation by the locals. This essay will discuss the potential causes of this problem before suggesting recommendations that can be made to change this negative attitude towards international travellers.
A number of perspectives indicate that foreign visitors are disadvantageous to their nation for some following factors. Firstly, the increase in the amount of tourists results in the increase of local waste. To illustrate, most travellers do not clean their trash after enjoying their time at the beach despite all locals' efforts to dispose of waste effectively. This can result in water, air and soil contamination. Another reason is the disrespectful behaviour of visitors to the local culture, such as mocking traditional customs. This can foster anger and conflict with communities, leading to fewer places being willing to support the country's tourism.
However, the problem can be solved by active approaches. The city's governance can consider installing more trash bins and garbage collection in tourist attractions, for example, waterfall landscapes. Additionally, clearly publicized penalties for those inclined to litter can enhance locals' attempts to protect their habitat as well the revenue from fines can fund the nation's tourism development. Furthermore, tour guides need to inform visitors properly about the local culture, for instance, wearing a short skirt when visiting a pagoda is inappropriate. From that travellers can acknowledge the differences in culture and show respect.
In conclusion, the concerns about the negative influences of international visitors are caused due to the tourists' irresponsibility and disrespectful behaviour toward a region and its traditions. However, the problem can be eased by the support from the government and the local community.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? How to change their views?
Anwser:
The tendency of global tourism has created the concern of its negative impacts on a nation by the locals. This essay will discuss the potential causes of this problem before suggesting recommendations that can be made to change this negative attitude towards international travellers.
A number of perspectives indicate that foreign visitors are disadvantageous to their nation for some following factors. Firstly, the increase in the amount of tourists results in the increase of local waste. To illustrate, most travellers do not clean their trash after enjoying their time at the beach despite all locals' efforts to dispose of waste effectively. This can result in water, air and soil contamination. Another reason is the disrespectful behaviour of visitors to the local culture, such as mocking traditional customs. This can foster anger and conflict with communities, leading to fewer places being willing to support the country's tourism.
However, the problem can be solved by active approaches. The city's governance can consider installing more trash bins and garbage collection in tourist attractions, for example, waterfall landscapes. Additionally, clearly publicized penalties for those inclined to litter can enhance locals' attempts to protect their habitat as well the revenue from fines can fund the nation's tourism development. Furthermore, tour guides need to inform visitors properly about the local culture, for instance, wearing a short skirt when visiting a pagoda is inappropriate. From that travellers can acknowledge the differences in culture and show respect.
In conclusion, the concerns about the negative influences of international visitors are caused due to the tourists' irresponsibility and disrespectful behaviour toward a region and its traditions. However, the problem can be eased by the support from the government and the local community.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? How to change their views?
Anwser:
The tendency of global tourism has created the concern of its negative impacts on a nation by the locals. This essay will discuss the potential causes of this problem before suggesting recommendations that can be made to change this negative attitude towards international travellers.
A number of perspectives indicate that foreign visitors are disadvantageous to their nation for some following factors. Firstly, the increase in the amount of tourists results in the increase of local waste. To illustrate, most travellers do not clean their trash after enjoying their time at the beach despite all locals' efforts to dispose of waste effectively. This can result in water, air and soil contamination. Another reason is the disrespectful behaviour of visitors to the local culture, such as mocking traditional customs. This can foster anger and conflict with communities, leading to fewer places being willing to support the country's tourism.
However, the problem can be solved by active approaches. The city's governance can consider installing more trash bins and garbage collection in tourist attractions, for example, waterfall landscapes. Additionally, clearly publicized penalties for those inclined to litter can enhance locals' attempts to protect their habitat as well the revenue from fines can fund the nation's tourism development. Furthermore, tour guides need to inform visitors properly about the local culture, for instance, wearing a short skirt when visiting a pagoda is inappropriate. From that travellers can acknowledge the differences in culture and show respect.
In conclusion, the concerns about the negative influences of international visitors are caused due to the tourists' irresponsibility and disrespectful behaviour toward a region and its traditions. However, the problem can be eased by the support from the government and the local community.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? How to change their views?
Anwser:
The tendency of global tourism has created the concern of its negative impacts on a nation by the locals. This essay will discuss the potential causes of this problem before suggesting recommendations that can be made to change this negative attitude towards international travellers.
A number of perspectives indicate that foreign visitors are disadvantageous to their nation for some following factors. Firstly, the increase in the amount of tourists results in the increase of local waste. To illustrate, most travellers do not clean their trash after enjoying their time at the beach despite all locals' efforts to dispose of waste effectively. This can result in water, air and soil contamination. Another reason is the disrespectful behaviour of visitors to the local culture, such as mocking traditional customs. This can foster anger and conflict with communities, leading to fewer places being willing to support the country's tourism.
However, the problem can be solved by active approaches. The city's governance can consider installing more trash bins and garbage collection in tourist attractions, for example, waterfall landscapes. Additionally, clearly publicized penalties for those inclined to litter can enhance locals' attempts to protect their habitat as well the revenue from fines can fund the nation's tourism development. Furthermore, tour guides need to inform visitors properly about the local culture, for instance, wearing a short skirt when visiting a pagoda is inappropriate. From that travellers can acknowledge the differences in culture and show respect.
In conclusion, the concerns about the negative influences of international visitors are caused due to the tourists' irresponsibility and disrespectful behaviour toward a region and its traditions. However, the problem can be eased by the support from the government and the local community.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? How to change their views?
Anwser:
The tendency of global tourism has created the concern of its negative impacts on a nation by the locals. This essay will discuss the potential causes of this problem before suggesting recommendations that can be made to change this negative attitude towards international travellers.
A number of perspectives indicate that foreign visitors are disadvantageous to their nation for some following factors. Firstly, the increase in the amount of tourists results in the increase of local waste. To illustrate, most travellers do not clean their trash after enjoying their time at the beach despite all locals' efforts to dispose of waste effectively. This can result in water, air and soil contamination. Another reason is the disrespectful behaviour of visitors to the local culture, such as mocking traditional customs. This can foster anger and conflict with communities, leading to fewer places being willing to support the country's tourism.
However, the problem can be solved by active approaches. The city's governance can consider installing more trash bins and garbage collection in tourist attractions, for example, waterfall landscapes. Additionally, clearly publicized penalties for those inclined to litter can enhance locals' attempts to protect their habitat as well the revenue from fines can fund the nation's tourism development. Furthermore, tour guides need to inform visitors properly about the local culture, for instance, wearing a short skirt when visiting a pagoda is inappropriate. From that travellers can acknowledge the differences in culture and show respect.
In conclusion, the concerns about the negative influences of international visitors are caused due to the tourists' irresponsibility and disrespectful behaviour toward a region and its traditions. However, the problem can be eased by the support from the government and the local community.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? How to change their views?
Anwser:
The tendency of global tourism has created the concern of its negative impacts on a nation by the locals. This essay will discuss the potential causes of this problem before suggesting recommendations that can be made to change this negative attitude towards international travellers.
A number of perspectives indicate that foreign visitors are disadvantageous to their nation for some following factors. Firstly, the increase in the amount of tourists results in the increase of local waste. To illustrate, most travellers do not clean their trash after enjoying their time at the beach despite all locals' efforts to dispose of waste effectively. This can result in water, air and soil contamination. Another reason is the disrespectful behaviour of visitors to the local culture, such as mocking traditional customs. This can foster anger and conflict with communities, leading to fewer places being willing to support the country's tourism.
However, the problem can be solved by active approaches. The city's governance can consider installing more trash bins and garbage collection in tourist attractions, for example, waterfall landscapes. Additionally, clearly publicized penalties for those inclined to litter can enhance locals' attempts to protect their habitat as well the revenue from fines can fund the nation's tourism development. Furthermore, tour guides need to inform visitors properly about the local culture, for instance, wearing a short skirt when visiting a pagoda is inappropriate. From that travellers can acknowledge the differences in culture and show respect.
In conclusion, the concerns about the negative influences of international visitors are caused due to the tourists' irresponsibility and disrespectful behaviour toward a region and its traditions. However, the problem can be eased by the support from the government and the local community.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? How to change their views?
Anwser:
The tendency of global tourism has created the concern of its negative impacts on a nation by the locals. This essay will discuss the potential causes of this problem before suggesting recommendations that can be made to change this negative attitude towards international travellers.
A number of perspectives indicate that foreign visitors are disadvantageous to their nation for some following factors. Firstly, the increase in the amount of tourists results in the increase of local waste. To illustrate, most travellers do not clean their trash after enjoying their time at the beach despite all locals' efforts to dispose of waste effectively. This can result in water, air and soil contamination. Another reason is the disrespectful behaviour of visitors to the local culture, such as mocking traditional customs. This can foster anger and conflict with communities, leading to fewer places being willing to support the country's tourism.
However, the problem can be solved by active approaches. The city's governance can consider installing more trash bins and garbage collection in tourist attractions, for example, waterfall landscapes. Additionally, clearly publicized penalties for those inclined to litter can enhance locals' attempts to protect their habitat as well the revenue from fines can fund the nation's tourism development. Furthermore, tour guides need to inform visitors properly about the local culture, for instance, wearing a short skirt when visiting a pagoda is inappropriate. From that travellers can acknowledge the differences in culture and show respect.
In conclusion, the concerns about the negative influences of international visitors are caused due to the tourists' irresponsibility and disrespectful behaviour toward a region and its traditions. However, the problem can be eased by the support from the government and the local community.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? How to change their views?
Anwser:
The tendency of global tourism has created the concern of its negative impacts on a nation by the locals. This essay will discuss the potential causes of this problem before suggesting recommendations that can be made to change this negative attitude towards international travellers.
A number of perspectives indicate that foreign visitors are disadvantageous to their nation for some following factors. Firstly, the increase in the amount of tourists results in the increase of local waste. To illustrate, most travellers do not clean their trash after enjoying their time at the beach despite all locals' efforts to dispose of waste effectively. This can result in water, air and soil contamination. Another reason is the disrespectful behaviour of visitors to the local culture, such as mocking traditional customs. This can foster anger and conflict with communities, leading to fewer places being willing to support the country's tourism.
However, the problem can be solved by active approaches. The city's governance can consider installing more trash bins and garbage collection in tourist attractions, for example, waterfall landscapes. Additionally, clearly publicized penalties for those inclined to litter can enhance locals' attempts to protect their habitat as well the revenue from fines can fund the nation's tourism development. Furthermore, tour guides need to inform visitors properly about the local culture, for instance, wearing a short skirt when visiting a pagoda is inappropriate. From that travellers can acknowledge the differences in culture and show respect.
In conclusion, the concerns about the negative influences of international visitors are caused due to the tourists' irresponsibility and disrespectful behaviour toward a region and its traditions. However, the problem can be eased by the support from the government and the local community.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
In this contemporary epoch, the idea of safeguarding the earth for the next generations has been gaining ground recently. Whilst environmentalists hold the view that authorities should deal with environmental matters as their main concern, opponents have a diverse perspective. I am of the belief that saving our planet should be our prime objective.
To embark on, global warming is one of the most crucial problems, and it has a detrimental impact on different aspects of people's lives. In other words, if the percentage of carbon dioxide elevates, this will lead to fluctuation in the global temperature, which may negatively affect agriculture. A prime example of this is the Western countries where their citizens take care of their carbon footprint. Hence, what can be said is that not only could toxic gases exacerbate a plethora of environmental affairs, but also it could have a catastrophic influence on crops.
Furthermore, pollution, which imposes a burden on the government economy, may aggravate a myriad of health concerns. To explain, when the rate of pollution rises, this could result in a widespread of malignant diseases. For instance, in Egypt, the authority allocates a high proportion of its budget to mitigate the effects of contamination on people's well-being. Hence, without focusing on environmental and pollution points, future generations would suffer in the long run.
In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the points mentioned above, it can be reiterated that even though there are a variety of issues, states put environmental problems as a main concern. I am convinced that in order to counteract these fatal environmental challenges, there would be local and global awareness.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
In this contemporary epoch, the idea of safeguarding the earth for the next generations has been gaining ground recently. Whilst environmentalists hold the view that authorities should deal with environmental matters as their main concern, opponents have a diverse perspective. I am of the belief that saving our planet should be our prime objective.
To embark on, global warming is one of the most crucial problems, and it has a detrimental impact on different aspects of people's lives. In other words, if the percentage of carbon dioxide elevates, this will lead to fluctuation in the global temperature, which may negatively affect agriculture. A prime example of this is the Western countries where their citizens take care of their carbon footprint. Hence, what can be said is that not only could toxic gases exacerbate a plethora of environmental affairs, but also it could have a catastrophic influence on crops.
Furthermore, pollution, which imposes a burden on the government economy, may aggravate a myriad of health concerns. To explain, when the rate of pollution rises, this could result in a widespread of malignant diseases. For instance, in Egypt, the authority allocates a high proportion of its budget to mitigate the effects of contamination on people's well-being. Hence, without focusing on environmental and pollution points, future generations would suffer in the long run.
In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the points mentioned above, it can be reiterated that even though there are a variety of issues, states put environmental problems as a main concern. I am convinced that in order to counteract these fatal environmental challenges, there would be local and global awareness.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
In this contemporary epoch, the idea of safeguarding the earth for the next generations has been gaining ground recently. Whilst environmentalists hold the view that authorities should deal with environmental matters as their main concern, opponents have a diverse perspective. I am of the belief that saving our planet should be our prime objective.
To embark on, global warming is one of the most crucial problems, and it has a detrimental impact on different aspects of people's lives. In other words, if the percentage of carbon dioxide elevates, this will lead to fluctuation in the global temperature, which may negatively affect agriculture. A prime example of this is the Western countries where their citizens take care of their carbon footprint. Hence, what can be said is that not only could toxic gases exacerbate a plethora of environmental affairs, but also it could have a catastrophic influence on crops.
Furthermore, pollution, which imposes a burden on the government economy, may aggravate a myriad of health concerns. To explain, when the rate of pollution rises, this could result in a widespread of malignant diseases. For instance, in Egypt, the authority allocates a high proportion of its budget to mitigate the effects of contamination on people's well-being. Hence, without focusing on environmental and pollution points, future generations would suffer in the long run.
In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the points mentioned above, it can be reiterated that even though there are a variety of issues, states put environmental problems as a main concern. I am convinced that in order to counteract these fatal environmental challenges, there would be local and global awareness.
| Your lexical resource score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
In this contemporary epoch, the idea of safeguarding the earth for the next generations has been gaining ground recently. Whilst environmentalists hold the view that authorities should deal with environmental matters as their main concern, opponents have a diverse perspective. I am of the belief that saving our planet should be our prime objective.
To embark on, global warming is one of the most crucial problems, and it has a detrimental impact on different aspects of people's lives. In other words, if the percentage of carbon dioxide elevates, this will lead to fluctuation in the global temperature, which may negatively affect agriculture. A prime example of this is the Western countries where their citizens take care of their carbon footprint. Hence, what can be said is that not only could toxic gases exacerbate a plethora of environmental affairs, but also it could have a catastrophic influence on crops.
Furthermore, pollution, which imposes a burden on the government economy, may aggravate a myriad of health concerns. To explain, when the rate of pollution rises, this could result in a widespread of malignant diseases. For instance, in Egypt, the authority allocates a high proportion of its budget to mitigate the effects of contamination on people's well-being. Hence, without focusing on environmental and pollution points, future generations would suffer in the long run.
In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the points mentioned above, it can be reiterated that even though there are a variety of issues, states put environmental problems as a main concern. I am convinced that in order to counteract these fatal environmental challenges, there would be local and global awareness.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
In this contemporary epoch, the idea of safeguarding the earth for the next generations has been gaining ground recently. Whilst environmentalists hold the view that authorities should deal with environmental matters as their main concern, opponents have a diverse perspective. I am of the belief that saving our planet should be our prime objective.
To embark on, global warming is one of the most crucial problems, and it has a detrimental impact on different aspects of people's lives. In other words, if the percentage of carbon dioxide elevates, this will lead to fluctuation in the global temperature, which may negatively affect agriculture. A prime example of this is the Western countries where their citizens take care of their carbon footprint. Hence, what can be said is that not only could toxic gases exacerbate a plethora of environmental affairs, but also it could have a catastrophic influence on crops.
Furthermore, pollution, which imposes a burden on the government economy, may aggravate a myriad of health concerns. To explain, when the rate of pollution rises, this could result in a widespread of malignant diseases. For instance, in Egypt, the authority allocates a high proportion of its budget to mitigate the effects of contamination on people's well-being. Hence, without focusing on environmental and pollution points, future generations would suffer in the long run.
In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the points mentioned above, it can be reiterated that even though there are a variety of issues, states put environmental problems as a main concern. I am convinced that in order to counteract these fatal environmental challenges, there would be local and global awareness.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
In this contemporary epoch, the idea of safeguarding the earth for the next generations has been gaining ground recently. Whilst environmentalists hold the view that authorities should deal with environmental matters as their main concern, opponents have a diverse perspective. I am of the belief that saving our planet should be our prime objective.
To embark on, global warming is one of the most crucial problems, and it has a detrimental impact on different aspects of people's lives. In other words, if the percentage of carbon dioxide elevates, this will lead to fluctuation in the global temperature, which may negatively affect agriculture. A prime example of this is the Western countries where their citizens take care of their carbon footprint. Hence, what can be said is that not only could toxic gases exacerbate a plethora of environmental affairs, but also it could have a catastrophic influence on crops.
Furthermore, pollution, which imposes a burden on the government economy, may aggravate a myriad of health concerns. To explain, when the rate of pollution rises, this could result in a widespread of malignant diseases. For instance, in Egypt, the authority allocates a high proportion of its budget to mitigate the effects of contamination on people's well-being. Hence, without focusing on environmental and pollution points, future generations would suffer in the long run.
In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the points mentioned above, it can be reiterated that even though there are a variety of issues, states put environmental problems as a main concern. I am convinced that in order to counteract these fatal environmental challenges, there would be local and global awareness.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
In this contemporary epoch, the idea of safeguarding the earth for the next generations has been gaining ground recently. Whilst environmentalists hold the view that authorities should deal with environmental matters as their main concern, opponents have a diverse perspective. I am of the belief that saving our planet should be our prime objective.
To embark on, global warming is one of the most crucial problems, and it has a detrimental impact on different aspects of people's lives. In other words, if the percentage of carbon dioxide elevates, this will lead to fluctuation in the global temperature, which may negatively affect agriculture. A prime example of this is the Western countries where their citizens take care of their carbon footprint. Hence, what can be said is that not only could toxic gases exacerbate a plethora of environmental affairs, but also it could have a catastrophic influence on crops.
Furthermore, pollution, which imposes a burden on the government economy, may aggravate a myriad of health concerns. To explain, when the rate of pollution rises, this could result in a widespread of malignant diseases. For instance, in Egypt, the authority allocates a high proportion of its budget to mitigate the effects of contamination on people's well-being. Hence, without focusing on environmental and pollution points, future generations would suffer in the long run.
In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the points mentioned above, it can be reiterated that even though there are a variety of issues, states put environmental problems as a main concern. I am convinced that in order to counteract these fatal environmental challenges, there would be local and global awareness.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Nowadays the most important task is the environmental protection of our planet for future generations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Anwser:
In this contemporary epoch, the idea of safeguarding the earth for the next generations has been gaining ground recently. Whilst environmentalists hold the view that authorities should deal with environmental matters as their main concern, opponents have a diverse perspective. I am of the belief that saving our planet should be our prime objective.
To embark on, global warming is one of the most crucial problems, and it has a detrimental impact on different aspects of people's lives. In other words, if the percentage of carbon dioxide elevates, this will lead to fluctuation in the global temperature, which may negatively affect agriculture. A prime example of this is the Western countries where their citizens take care of their carbon footprint. Hence, what can be said is that not only could toxic gases exacerbate a plethora of environmental affairs, but also it could have a catastrophic influence on crops.
Furthermore, pollution, which imposes a burden on the government economy, may aggravate a myriad of health concerns. To explain, when the rate of pollution rises, this could result in a widespread of malignant diseases. For instance, in Egypt, the authority allocates a high proportion of its budget to mitigate the effects of contamination on people's well-being. Hence, without focusing on environmental and pollution points, future generations would suffer in the long run.
In conclusion, after this essay has manifested the points mentioned above, it can be reiterated that even though there are a variety of issues, states put environmental problems as a main concern. I am convinced that in order to counteract these fatal environmental challenges, there would be local and global awareness.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
22.Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity. Discuss both side and give your opinion
Anwser:
The popularity of extreme sports has sparked a profound debate among the public. Some contend that these games should be prohibited due to safety issues, whereas others believe that people should be free to do any sports activity. In this essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, proponents of prohibition argue that dangerous sports bring numerous risks to players. To be more specific, they are dealing with life-threatening perils when playing these games, especially those involving specialized equipment such as skydiving, motor racing and jump base. It is true that no matter how talented they are, there is still the risk that the accompanying equipment is in trouble, causing serious injuries and even death to players. Additionally, some dangerous sports, like boxing, contain violent content which can lead to aggressive thoughts and behaviour of audiences, especially among teenagers. This is the main factor contributing to bully and criminal activities in school-aged children.
On the other hand, proponents of dangerous sports argue that people should have the right to participate in any sports activity they like. An individual's freedom is first and foremost, thus, prohibiting someone from pursuing their passions is unreasonable, especially when they have fully acknowledged the risk that might occur. Furthermore, all players need to undergo a careful and rigorous training course when they play extreme sports. For example, people who skydive are required to obtain a USPA "A" licence before they want to skydive alone without supervision. In addition, in some cases, dangerous sports can lead to remarkable achievement and global recognition for athletes. This recognition can be a source of inspiration and pride. For instance, two Vietnamese athletes became national pride when they set their Guinness Records for consecutively climbing stairs while balancing a person on their heads.
In conclusion, although safety concerns and the violent content in some dangerous sports are critical, I firmly believe that people should be free to do any sports of their choice. Banning these games outright may not be an effective solution, but regulation, education and safety measures can strike a balance between personal liberty and public safety.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
22.Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity. Discuss both side and give your opinion
Anwser:
The popularity of extreme sports has sparked a profound debate among the public. Some contend that these games should be prohibited due to safety issues, whereas others believe that people should be free to do any sports activity. In this essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, proponents of prohibition argue that dangerous sports bring numerous risks to players. To be more specific, they are dealing with life-threatening perils when playing these games, especially those involving specialized equipment such as skydiving, motor racing and jump base. It is true that no matter how talented they are, there is still the risk that the accompanying equipment is in trouble, causing serious injuries and even death to players. Additionally, some dangerous sports, like boxing, contain violent content which can lead to aggressive thoughts and behaviour of audiences, especially among teenagers. This is the main factor contributing to bully and criminal activities in school-aged children.
On the other hand, proponents of dangerous sports argue that people should have the right to participate in any sports activity they like. An individual's freedom is first and foremost, thus, prohibiting someone from pursuing their passions is unreasonable, especially when they have fully acknowledged the risk that might occur. Furthermore, all players need to undergo a careful and rigorous training course when they play extreme sports. For example, people who skydive are required to obtain a USPA "A" licence before they want to skydive alone without supervision. In addition, in some cases, dangerous sports can lead to remarkable achievement and global recognition for athletes. This recognition can be a source of inspiration and pride. For instance, two Vietnamese athletes became national pride when they set their Guinness Records for consecutively climbing stairs while balancing a person on their heads.
In conclusion, although safety concerns and the violent content in some dangerous sports are critical, I firmly believe that people should be free to do any sports of their choice. Banning these games outright may not be an effective solution, but regulation, education and safety measures can strike a balance between personal liberty and public safety.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
22.Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity. Discuss both side and give your opinion
Anwser:
The popularity of extreme sports has sparked a profound debate among the public. Some contend that these games should be prohibited due to safety issues, whereas others believe that people should be free to do any sports activity. In this essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, proponents of prohibition argue that dangerous sports bring numerous risks to players. To be more specific, they are dealing with life-threatening perils when playing these games, especially those involving specialized equipment such as skydiving, motor racing and jump base. It is true that no matter how talented they are, there is still the risk that the accompanying equipment is in trouble, causing serious injuries and even death to players. Additionally, some dangerous sports, like boxing, contain violent content which can lead to aggressive thoughts and behaviour of audiences, especially among teenagers. This is the main factor contributing to bully and criminal activities in school-aged children.
On the other hand, proponents of dangerous sports argue that people should have the right to participate in any sports activity they like. An individual's freedom is first and foremost, thus, prohibiting someone from pursuing their passions is unreasonable, especially when they have fully acknowledged the risk that might occur. Furthermore, all players need to undergo a careful and rigorous training course when they play extreme sports. For example, people who skydive are required to obtain a USPA "A" licence before they want to skydive alone without supervision. In addition, in some cases, dangerous sports can lead to remarkable achievement and global recognition for athletes. This recognition can be a source of inspiration and pride. For instance, two Vietnamese athletes became national pride when they set their Guinness Records for consecutively climbing stairs while balancing a person on their heads.
In conclusion, although safety concerns and the violent content in some dangerous sports are critical, I firmly believe that people should be free to do any sports of their choice. Banning these games outright may not be an effective solution, but regulation, education and safety measures can strike a balance between personal liberty and public safety.
| Your lexical resource score is 6.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
22.Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity. Discuss both side and give your opinion
Anwser:
The popularity of extreme sports has sparked a profound debate among the public. Some contend that these games should be prohibited due to safety issues, whereas others believe that people should be free to do any sports activity. In this essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, proponents of prohibition argue that dangerous sports bring numerous risks to players. To be more specific, they are dealing with life-threatening perils when playing these games, especially those involving specialized equipment such as skydiving, motor racing and jump base. It is true that no matter how talented they are, there is still the risk that the accompanying equipment is in trouble, causing serious injuries and even death to players. Additionally, some dangerous sports, like boxing, contain violent content which can lead to aggressive thoughts and behaviour of audiences, especially among teenagers. This is the main factor contributing to bully and criminal activities in school-aged children.
On the other hand, proponents of dangerous sports argue that people should have the right to participate in any sports activity they like. An individual's freedom is first and foremost, thus, prohibiting someone from pursuing their passions is unreasonable, especially when they have fully acknowledged the risk that might occur. Furthermore, all players need to undergo a careful and rigorous training course when they play extreme sports. For example, people who skydive are required to obtain a USPA "A" licence before they want to skydive alone without supervision. In addition, in some cases, dangerous sports can lead to remarkable achievement and global recognition for athletes. This recognition can be a source of inspiration and pride. For instance, two Vietnamese athletes became national pride when they set their Guinness Records for consecutively climbing stairs while balancing a person on their heads.
In conclusion, although safety concerns and the violent content in some dangerous sports are critical, I firmly believe that people should be free to do any sports of their choice. Banning these games outright may not be an effective solution, but regulation, education and safety measures can strike a balance between personal liberty and public safety.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 6.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
22.Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity. Discuss both side and give your opinion
Anwser:
The popularity of extreme sports has sparked a profound debate among the public. Some contend that these games should be prohibited due to safety issues, whereas others believe that people should be free to do any sports activity. In this essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, proponents of prohibition argue that dangerous sports bring numerous risks to players. To be more specific, they are dealing with life-threatening perils when playing these games, especially those involving specialized equipment such as skydiving, motor racing and jump base. It is true that no matter how talented they are, there is still the risk that the accompanying equipment is in trouble, causing serious injuries and even death to players. Additionally, some dangerous sports, like boxing, contain violent content which can lead to aggressive thoughts and behaviour of audiences, especially among teenagers. This is the main factor contributing to bully and criminal activities in school-aged children.
On the other hand, proponents of dangerous sports argue that people should have the right to participate in any sports activity they like. An individual's freedom is first and foremost, thus, prohibiting someone from pursuing their passions is unreasonable, especially when they have fully acknowledged the risk that might occur. Furthermore, all players need to undergo a careful and rigorous training course when they play extreme sports. For example, people who skydive are required to obtain a USPA "A" licence before they want to skydive alone without supervision. In addition, in some cases, dangerous sports can lead to remarkable achievement and global recognition for athletes. This recognition can be a source of inspiration and pride. For instance, two Vietnamese athletes became national pride when they set their Guinness Records for consecutively climbing stairs while balancing a person on their heads.
In conclusion, although safety concerns and the violent content in some dangerous sports are critical, I firmly believe that people should be free to do any sports of their choice. Banning these games outright may not be an effective solution, but regulation, education and safety measures can strike a balance between personal liberty and public safety.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
22.Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity. Discuss both side and give your opinion
Anwser:
The popularity of extreme sports has sparked a profound debate among the public. Some contend that these games should be prohibited due to safety issues, whereas others believe that people should be free to do any sports activity. In this essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, proponents of prohibition argue that dangerous sports bring numerous risks to players. To be more specific, they are dealing with life-threatening perils when playing these games, especially those involving specialized equipment such as skydiving, motor racing and jump base. It is true that no matter how talented they are, there is still the risk that the accompanying equipment is in trouble, causing serious injuries and even death to players. Additionally, some dangerous sports, like boxing, contain violent content which can lead to aggressive thoughts and behaviour of audiences, especially among teenagers. This is the main factor contributing to bully and criminal activities in school-aged children.
On the other hand, proponents of dangerous sports argue that people should have the right to participate in any sports activity they like. An individual's freedom is first and foremost, thus, prohibiting someone from pursuing their passions is unreasonable, especially when they have fully acknowledged the risk that might occur. Furthermore, all players need to undergo a careful and rigorous training course when they play extreme sports. For example, people who skydive are required to obtain a USPA "A" licence before they want to skydive alone without supervision. In addition, in some cases, dangerous sports can lead to remarkable achievement and global recognition for athletes. This recognition can be a source of inspiration and pride. For instance, two Vietnamese athletes became national pride when they set their Guinness Records for consecutively climbing stairs while balancing a person on their heads.
In conclusion, although safety concerns and the violent content in some dangerous sports are critical, I firmly believe that people should be free to do any sports of their choice. Banning these games outright may not be an effective solution, but regulation, education and safety measures can strike a balance between personal liberty and public safety.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
22.Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity. Discuss both side and give your opinion
Anwser:
The popularity of extreme sports has sparked a profound debate among the public. Some contend that these games should be prohibited due to safety issues, whereas others believe that people should be free to do any sports activity. In this essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, proponents of prohibition argue that dangerous sports bring numerous risks to players. To be more specific, they are dealing with life-threatening perils when playing these games, especially those involving specialized equipment such as skydiving, motor racing and jump base. It is true that no matter how talented they are, there is still the risk that the accompanying equipment is in trouble, causing serious injuries and even death to players. Additionally, some dangerous sports, like boxing, contain violent content which can lead to aggressive thoughts and behaviour of audiences, especially among teenagers. This is the main factor contributing to bully and criminal activities in school-aged children.
On the other hand, proponents of dangerous sports argue that people should have the right to participate in any sports activity they like. An individual's freedom is first and foremost, thus, prohibiting someone from pursuing their passions is unreasonable, especially when they have fully acknowledged the risk that might occur. Furthermore, all players need to undergo a careful and rigorous training course when they play extreme sports. For example, people who skydive are required to obtain a USPA "A" licence before they want to skydive alone without supervision. In addition, in some cases, dangerous sports can lead to remarkable achievement and global recognition for athletes. This recognition can be a source of inspiration and pride. For instance, two Vietnamese athletes became national pride when they set their Guinness Records for consecutively climbing stairs while balancing a person on their heads.
In conclusion, although safety concerns and the violent content in some dangerous sports are critical, I firmly believe that people should be free to do any sports of their choice. Banning these games outright may not be an effective solution, but regulation, education and safety measures can strike a balance between personal liberty and public safety.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
22.Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity. Discuss both side and give your opinion
Anwser:
The popularity of extreme sports has sparked a profound debate among the public. Some contend that these games should be prohibited due to safety issues, whereas others believe that people should be free to do any sports activity. In this essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, proponents of prohibition argue that dangerous sports bring numerous risks to players. To be more specific, they are dealing with life-threatening perils when playing these games, especially those involving specialized equipment such as skydiving, motor racing and jump base. It is true that no matter how talented they are, there is still the risk that the accompanying equipment is in trouble, causing serious injuries and even death to players. Additionally, some dangerous sports, like boxing, contain violent content which can lead to aggressive thoughts and behaviour of audiences, especially among teenagers. This is the main factor contributing to bully and criminal activities in school-aged children.
On the other hand, proponents of dangerous sports argue that people should have the right to participate in any sports activity they like. An individual's freedom is first and foremost, thus, prohibiting someone from pursuing their passions is unreasonable, especially when they have fully acknowledged the risk that might occur. Furthermore, all players need to undergo a careful and rigorous training course when they play extreme sports. For example, people who skydive are required to obtain a USPA "A" licence before they want to skydive alone without supervision. In addition, in some cases, dangerous sports can lead to remarkable achievement and global recognition for athletes. This recognition can be a source of inspiration and pride. For instance, two Vietnamese athletes became national pride when they set their Guinness Records for consecutively climbing stairs while balancing a person on their heads.
In conclusion, although safety concerns and the violent content in some dangerous sports are critical, I firmly believe that people should be free to do any sports of their choice. Banning these games outright may not be an effective solution, but regulation, education and safety measures can strike a balance between personal liberty and public safety.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that water is the most important natural resource. Others believe that other resources (such as oil and gold) are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
People are disputing whether aqua or oil and gold are the most prominent natural resources in the World. While fossil fuel and precious metals are widely used in various industries and trading purposes water is vital not only for the human population but for all living too. In the following paragraphs, I will expand on both approaches and bring a couple of examples.
After the discovery of the benefits of natural resources, humanity implemented them in many aspects of their lives. Our modern society, focused on consumption, completely depends on resources and constantly rising demand for new goods and services increases the value of these resources. However, this is an artificial lifestyle that will be tremendously changed due to the rapid progress of technology. In other words, with time passed more and more fuel and metals are going to be replaced with other sources of power and material.
On the other hand, there is no adequate replacement of H2O that is suitable for drinking. Water is represented in limited volume on our planet. Moreover, we can't anticipate and rely on instant changes in human biology that will make us less water-dependable. Based on this forecast it becomes obvious that water is the most precious natural resource for inhabitants of the planet Earth. Additionally, all plants and animals that resemble the contemporary food chain are water consumers.
To conclude, while there are divided opinions regarding the importance of natural resources, water is particularly significant. Taking into consideration other species and ingredients required for basic life we can declare that other fossils are secondary in the scale of life dependancy.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that water is the most important natural resource. Others believe that other resources (such as oil and gold) are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
People are disputing whether aqua or oil and gold are the most prominent natural resources in the World. While fossil fuel and precious metals are widely used in various industries and trading purposes water is vital not only for the human population but for all living too. In the following paragraphs, I will expand on both approaches and bring a couple of examples.
After the discovery of the benefits of natural resources, humanity implemented them in many aspects of their lives. Our modern society, focused on consumption, completely depends on resources and constantly rising demand for new goods and services increases the value of these resources. However, this is an artificial lifestyle that will be tremendously changed due to the rapid progress of technology. In other words, with time passed more and more fuel and metals are going to be replaced with other sources of power and material.
On the other hand, there is no adequate replacement of H2O that is suitable for drinking. Water is represented in limited volume on our planet. Moreover, we can't anticipate and rely on instant changes in human biology that will make us less water-dependable. Based on this forecast it becomes obvious that water is the most precious natural resource for inhabitants of the planet Earth. Additionally, all plants and animals that resemble the contemporary food chain are water consumers.
To conclude, while there are divided opinions regarding the importance of natural resources, water is particularly significant. Taking into consideration other species and ingredients required for basic life we can declare that other fossils are secondary in the scale of life dependancy.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that water is the most important natural resource. Others believe that other resources (such as oil and gold) are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
People are disputing whether aqua or oil and gold are the most prominent natural resources in the World. While fossil fuel and precious metals are widely used in various industries and trading purposes water is vital not only for the human population but for all living too. In the following paragraphs, I will expand on both approaches and bring a couple of examples.
After the discovery of the benefits of natural resources, humanity implemented them in many aspects of their lives. Our modern society, focused on consumption, completely depends on resources and constantly rising demand for new goods and services increases the value of these resources. However, this is an artificial lifestyle that will be tremendously changed due to the rapid progress of technology. In other words, with time passed more and more fuel and metals are going to be replaced with other sources of power and material.
On the other hand, there is no adequate replacement of H2O that is suitable for drinking. Water is represented in limited volume on our planet. Moreover, we can't anticipate and rely on instant changes in human biology that will make us less water-dependable. Based on this forecast it becomes obvious that water is the most precious natural resource for inhabitants of the planet Earth. Additionally, all plants and animals that resemble the contemporary food chain are water consumers.
To conclude, while there are divided opinions regarding the importance of natural resources, water is particularly significant. Taking into consideration other species and ingredients required for basic life we can declare that other fossils are secondary in the scale of life dependancy.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that water is the most important natural resource. Others believe that other resources (such as oil and gold) are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
People are disputing whether aqua or oil and gold are the most prominent natural resources in the World. While fossil fuel and precious metals are widely used in various industries and trading purposes water is vital not only for the human population but for all living too. In the following paragraphs, I will expand on both approaches and bring a couple of examples.
After the discovery of the benefits of natural resources, humanity implemented them in many aspects of their lives. Our modern society, focused on consumption, completely depends on resources and constantly rising demand for new goods and services increases the value of these resources. However, this is an artificial lifestyle that will be tremendously changed due to the rapid progress of technology. In other words, with time passed more and more fuel and metals are going to be replaced with other sources of power and material.
On the other hand, there is no adequate replacement of H2O that is suitable for drinking. Water is represented in limited volume on our planet. Moreover, we can't anticipate and rely on instant changes in human biology that will make us less water-dependable. Based on this forecast it becomes obvious that water is the most precious natural resource for inhabitants of the planet Earth. Additionally, all plants and animals that resemble the contemporary food chain are water consumers.
To conclude, while there are divided opinions regarding the importance of natural resources, water is particularly significant. Taking into consideration other species and ingredients required for basic life we can declare that other fossils are secondary in the scale of life dependancy.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that water is the most important natural resource. Others believe that other resources (such as oil and gold) are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
People are disputing whether aqua or oil and gold are the most prominent natural resources in the World. While fossil fuel and precious metals are widely used in various industries and trading purposes water is vital not only for the human population but for all living too. In the following paragraphs, I will expand on both approaches and bring a couple of examples.
After the discovery of the benefits of natural resources, humanity implemented them in many aspects of their lives. Our modern society, focused on consumption, completely depends on resources and constantly rising demand for new goods and services increases the value of these resources. However, this is an artificial lifestyle that will be tremendously changed due to the rapid progress of technology. In other words, with time passed more and more fuel and metals are going to be replaced with other sources of power and material.
On the other hand, there is no adequate replacement of H2O that is suitable for drinking. Water is represented in limited volume on our planet. Moreover, we can't anticipate and rely on instant changes in human biology that will make us less water-dependable. Based on this forecast it becomes obvious that water is the most precious natural resource for inhabitants of the planet Earth. Additionally, all plants and animals that resemble the contemporary food chain are water consumers.
To conclude, while there are divided opinions regarding the importance of natural resources, water is particularly significant. Taking into consideration other species and ingredients required for basic life we can declare that other fossils are secondary in the scale of life dependancy.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that water is the most important natural resource. Others believe that other resources (such as oil and gold) are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
People are disputing whether aqua or oil and gold are the most prominent natural resources in the World. While fossil fuel and precious metals are widely used in various industries and trading purposes water is vital not only for the human population but for all living too. In the following paragraphs, I will expand on both approaches and bring a couple of examples.
After the discovery of the benefits of natural resources, humanity implemented them in many aspects of their lives. Our modern society, focused on consumption, completely depends on resources and constantly rising demand for new goods and services increases the value of these resources. However, this is an artificial lifestyle that will be tremendously changed due to the rapid progress of technology. In other words, with time passed more and more fuel and metals are going to be replaced with other sources of power and material.
On the other hand, there is no adequate replacement of H2O that is suitable for drinking. Water is represented in limited volume on our planet. Moreover, we can't anticipate and rely on instant changes in human biology that will make us less water-dependable. Based on this forecast it becomes obvious that water is the most precious natural resource for inhabitants of the planet Earth. Additionally, all plants and animals that resemble the contemporary food chain are water consumers.
To conclude, while there are divided opinions regarding the importance of natural resources, water is particularly significant. Taking into consideration other species and ingredients required for basic life we can declare that other fossils are secondary in the scale of life dependancy.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that water is the most important natural resource. Others believe that other resources (such as oil and gold) are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
People are disputing whether aqua or oil and gold are the most prominent natural resources in the World. While fossil fuel and precious metals are widely used in various industries and trading purposes water is vital not only for the human population but for all living too. In the following paragraphs, I will expand on both approaches and bring a couple of examples.
After the discovery of the benefits of natural resources, humanity implemented them in many aspects of their lives. Our modern society, focused on consumption, completely depends on resources and constantly rising demand for new goods and services increases the value of these resources. However, this is an artificial lifestyle that will be tremendously changed due to the rapid progress of technology. In other words, with time passed more and more fuel and metals are going to be replaced with other sources of power and material.
On the other hand, there is no adequate replacement of H2O that is suitable for drinking. Water is represented in limited volume on our planet. Moreover, we can't anticipate and rely on instant changes in human biology that will make us less water-dependable. Based on this forecast it becomes obvious that water is the most precious natural resource for inhabitants of the planet Earth. Additionally, all plants and animals that resemble the contemporary food chain are water consumers.
To conclude, while there are divided opinions regarding the importance of natural resources, water is particularly significant. Taking into consideration other species and ingredients required for basic life we can declare that other fossils are secondary in the scale of life dependancy.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that water is the most important natural resource. Others believe that other resources (such as oil and gold) are more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
People are disputing whether aqua or oil and gold are the most prominent natural resources in the World. While fossil fuel and precious metals are widely used in various industries and trading purposes water is vital not only for the human population but for all living too. In the following paragraphs, I will expand on both approaches and bring a couple of examples.
After the discovery of the benefits of natural resources, humanity implemented them in many aspects of their lives. Our modern society, focused on consumption, completely depends on resources and constantly rising demand for new goods and services increases the value of these resources. However, this is an artificial lifestyle that will be tremendously changed due to the rapid progress of technology. In other words, with time passed more and more fuel and metals are going to be replaced with other sources of power and material.
On the other hand, there is no adequate replacement of H2O that is suitable for drinking. Water is represented in limited volume on our planet. Moreover, we can't anticipate and rely on instant changes in human biology that will make us less water-dependable. Based on this forecast it becomes obvious that water is the most precious natural resource for inhabitants of the planet Earth. Additionally, all plants and animals that resemble the contemporary food chain are water consumers.
To conclude, while there are divided opinions regarding the importance of natural resources, water is particularly significant. Taking into consideration other species and ingredients required for basic life we can declare that other fossils are secondary in the scale of life dependancy.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? What can be done to increase this popularity?
Anwser:
In comparison with other forms of transport, cycling would be an environmentally friendly approach. There are a a variety of reasons behind the lack of publicity and some steps, which can be considered to improve that.
some reasons can be discussed for the lack of cycling universality. Firstly, numerous individuals work far from their homes, such as factories in rural areas. They have to use their own private vehicles to reach their workplace, so they cannot use bicycles. Secondly, in developing countries, the infrastructure for bicycle manufacturing companies is at a low level. In these areas, international firms dominate the cycling market, which is not cost-effective for both the government and citizens. Finally, some individuals are not completely aware of the numerous positive effects, which this kind of transport can in the environment. For instance, they do not know that cycling can reduce carbon emissions, which is the main cause of global warming and greenhouse gasses.
Some actions can be taken in order to increase the commonness of cycling among people. To start with, public transportation should be expanded into the countryside and some places should be built for hiring bicycles, especially in the city centre and residential areas. In order to do that, some employees would be encouraged to have some physical activities and hire a bike to the nearest underground station. Furthermore, advertisement can be an effective approach. Broadcasting on television, street billboards social media advertisements can aware individuals of the beneficial impacts of cycling. Additionally, The governments should allocate funding to manufacturing companies to construct the majority number of bicycles. If the government support the cycling industry, the cost of this transportation vehicle would be reduced.
In conclusion, cycling is not popular among individuals because of some reasons such as long distances and not awareness. However, some decisions can be taken to increase public knowledge such as government funding and advertisement.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? What can be done to increase this popularity?
Anwser:
In comparison with other forms of transport, cycling would be an environmentally friendly approach. There are a a variety of reasons behind the lack of publicity and some steps, which can be considered to improve that.
some reasons can be discussed for the lack of cycling universality. Firstly, numerous individuals work far from their homes, such as factories in rural areas. They have to use their own private vehicles to reach their workplace, so they cannot use bicycles. Secondly, in developing countries, the infrastructure for bicycle manufacturing companies is at a low level. In these areas, international firms dominate the cycling market, which is not cost-effective for both the government and citizens. Finally, some individuals are not completely aware of the numerous positive effects, which this kind of transport can in the environment. For instance, they do not know that cycling can reduce carbon emissions, which is the main cause of global warming and greenhouse gasses.
Some actions can be taken in order to increase the commonness of cycling among people. To start with, public transportation should be expanded into the countryside and some places should be built for hiring bicycles, especially in the city centre and residential areas. In order to do that, some employees would be encouraged to have some physical activities and hire a bike to the nearest underground station. Furthermore, advertisement can be an effective approach. Broadcasting on television, street billboards social media advertisements can aware individuals of the beneficial impacts of cycling. Additionally, The governments should allocate funding to manufacturing companies to construct the majority number of bicycles. If the government support the cycling industry, the cost of this transportation vehicle would be reduced.
In conclusion, cycling is not popular among individuals because of some reasons such as long distances and not awareness. However, some decisions can be taken to increase public knowledge such as government funding and advertisement.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? What can be done to increase this popularity?
Anwser:
In comparison with other forms of transport, cycling would be an environmentally friendly approach. There are a a variety of reasons behind the lack of publicity and some steps, which can be considered to improve that.
some reasons can be discussed for the lack of cycling universality. Firstly, numerous individuals work far from their homes, such as factories in rural areas. They have to use their own private vehicles to reach their workplace, so they cannot use bicycles. Secondly, in developing countries, the infrastructure for bicycle manufacturing companies is at a low level. In these areas, international firms dominate the cycling market, which is not cost-effective for both the government and citizens. Finally, some individuals are not completely aware of the numerous positive effects, which this kind of transport can in the environment. For instance, they do not know that cycling can reduce carbon emissions, which is the main cause of global warming and greenhouse gasses.
Some actions can be taken in order to increase the commonness of cycling among people. To start with, public transportation should be expanded into the countryside and some places should be built for hiring bicycles, especially in the city centre and residential areas. In order to do that, some employees would be encouraged to have some physical activities and hire a bike to the nearest underground station. Furthermore, advertisement can be an effective approach. Broadcasting on television, street billboards social media advertisements can aware individuals of the beneficial impacts of cycling. Additionally, The governments should allocate funding to manufacturing companies to construct the majority number of bicycles. If the government support the cycling industry, the cost of this transportation vehicle would be reduced.
In conclusion, cycling is not popular among individuals because of some reasons such as long distances and not awareness. However, some decisions can be taken to increase public knowledge such as government funding and advertisement.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? What can be done to increase this popularity?
Anwser:
In comparison with other forms of transport, cycling would be an environmentally friendly approach. There are a a variety of reasons behind the lack of publicity and some steps, which can be considered to improve that.
some reasons can be discussed for the lack of cycling universality. Firstly, numerous individuals work far from their homes, such as factories in rural areas. They have to use their own private vehicles to reach their workplace, so they cannot use bicycles. Secondly, in developing countries, the infrastructure for bicycle manufacturing companies is at a low level. In these areas, international firms dominate the cycling market, which is not cost-effective for both the government and citizens. Finally, some individuals are not completely aware of the numerous positive effects, which this kind of transport can in the environment. For instance, they do not know that cycling can reduce carbon emissions, which is the main cause of global warming and greenhouse gasses.
Some actions can be taken in order to increase the commonness of cycling among people. To start with, public transportation should be expanded into the countryside and some places should be built for hiring bicycles, especially in the city centre and residential areas. In order to do that, some employees would be encouraged to have some physical activities and hire a bike to the nearest underground station. Furthermore, advertisement can be an effective approach. Broadcasting on television, street billboards social media advertisements can aware individuals of the beneficial impacts of cycling. Additionally, The governments should allocate funding to manufacturing companies to construct the majority number of bicycles. If the government support the cycling industry, the cost of this transportation vehicle would be reduced.
In conclusion, cycling is not popular among individuals because of some reasons such as long distances and not awareness. However, some decisions can be taken to increase public knowledge such as government funding and advertisement.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? What can be done to increase this popularity?
Anwser:
In comparison with other forms of transport, cycling would be an environmentally friendly approach. There are a a variety of reasons behind the lack of publicity and some steps, which can be considered to improve that.
some reasons can be discussed for the lack of cycling universality. Firstly, numerous individuals work far from their homes, such as factories in rural areas. They have to use their own private vehicles to reach their workplace, so they cannot use bicycles. Secondly, in developing countries, the infrastructure for bicycle manufacturing companies is at a low level. In these areas, international firms dominate the cycling market, which is not cost-effective for both the government and citizens. Finally, some individuals are not completely aware of the numerous positive effects, which this kind of transport can in the environment. For instance, they do not know that cycling can reduce carbon emissions, which is the main cause of global warming and greenhouse gasses.
Some actions can be taken in order to increase the commonness of cycling among people. To start with, public transportation should be expanded into the countryside and some places should be built for hiring bicycles, especially in the city centre and residential areas. In order to do that, some employees would be encouraged to have some physical activities and hire a bike to the nearest underground station. Furthermore, advertisement can be an effective approach. Broadcasting on television, street billboards social media advertisements can aware individuals of the beneficial impacts of cycling. Additionally, The governments should allocate funding to manufacturing companies to construct the majority number of bicycles. If the government support the cycling industry, the cost of this transportation vehicle would be reduced.
In conclusion, cycling is not popular among individuals because of some reasons such as long distances and not awareness. However, some decisions can be taken to increase public knowledge such as government funding and advertisement.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? What can be done to increase this popularity?
Anwser:
In comparison with other forms of transport, cycling would be an environmentally friendly approach. There are a a variety of reasons behind the lack of publicity and some steps, which can be considered to improve that.
some reasons can be discussed for the lack of cycling universality. Firstly, numerous individuals work far from their homes, such as factories in rural areas. They have to use their own private vehicles to reach their workplace, so they cannot use bicycles. Secondly, in developing countries, the infrastructure for bicycle manufacturing companies is at a low level. In these areas, international firms dominate the cycling market, which is not cost-effective for both the government and citizens. Finally, some individuals are not completely aware of the numerous positive effects, which this kind of transport can in the environment. For instance, they do not know that cycling can reduce carbon emissions, which is the main cause of global warming and greenhouse gasses.
Some actions can be taken in order to increase the commonness of cycling among people. To start with, public transportation should be expanded into the countryside and some places should be built for hiring bicycles, especially in the city centre and residential areas. In order to do that, some employees would be encouraged to have some physical activities and hire a bike to the nearest underground station. Furthermore, advertisement can be an effective approach. Broadcasting on television, street billboards social media advertisements can aware individuals of the beneficial impacts of cycling. Additionally, The governments should allocate funding to manufacturing companies to construct the majority number of bicycles. If the government support the cycling industry, the cost of this transportation vehicle would be reduced.
In conclusion, cycling is not popular among individuals because of some reasons such as long distances and not awareness. However, some decisions can be taken to increase public knowledge such as government funding and advertisement.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? What can be done to increase this popularity?
Anwser:
In comparison with other forms of transport, cycling would be an environmentally friendly approach. There are a a variety of reasons behind the lack of publicity and some steps, which can be considered to improve that.
some reasons can be discussed for the lack of cycling universality. Firstly, numerous individuals work far from their homes, such as factories in rural areas. They have to use their own private vehicles to reach their workplace, so they cannot use bicycles. Secondly, in developing countries, the infrastructure for bicycle manufacturing companies is at a low level. In these areas, international firms dominate the cycling market, which is not cost-effective for both the government and citizens. Finally, some individuals are not completely aware of the numerous positive effects, which this kind of transport can in the environment. For instance, they do not know that cycling can reduce carbon emissions, which is the main cause of global warming and greenhouse gasses.
Some actions can be taken in order to increase the commonness of cycling among people. To start with, public transportation should be expanded into the countryside and some places should be built for hiring bicycles, especially in the city centre and residential areas. In order to do that, some employees would be encouraged to have some physical activities and hire a bike to the nearest underground station. Furthermore, advertisement can be an effective approach. Broadcasting on television, street billboards social media advertisements can aware individuals of the beneficial impacts of cycling. Additionally, The governments should allocate funding to manufacturing companies to construct the majority number of bicycles. If the government support the cycling industry, the cost of this transportation vehicle would be reduced.
In conclusion, cycling is not popular among individuals because of some reasons such as long distances and not awareness. However, some decisions can be taken to increase public knowledge such as government funding and advertisement.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? What can be done to increase this popularity?
Anwser:
In comparison with other forms of transport, cycling would be an environmentally friendly approach. There are a a variety of reasons behind the lack of publicity and some steps, which can be considered to improve that.
some reasons can be discussed for the lack of cycling universality. Firstly, numerous individuals work far from their homes, such as factories in rural areas. They have to use their own private vehicles to reach their workplace, so they cannot use bicycles. Secondly, in developing countries, the infrastructure for bicycle manufacturing companies is at a low level. In these areas, international firms dominate the cycling market, which is not cost-effective for both the government and citizens. Finally, some individuals are not completely aware of the numerous positive effects, which this kind of transport can in the environment. For instance, they do not know that cycling can reduce carbon emissions, which is the main cause of global warming and greenhouse gasses.
Some actions can be taken in order to increase the commonness of cycling among people. To start with, public transportation should be expanded into the countryside and some places should be built for hiring bicycles, especially in the city centre and residential areas. In order to do that, some employees would be encouraged to have some physical activities and hire a bike to the nearest underground station. Furthermore, advertisement can be an effective approach. Broadcasting on television, street billboards social media advertisements can aware individuals of the beneficial impacts of cycling. Additionally, The governments should allocate funding to manufacturing companies to construct the majority number of bicycles. If the government support the cycling industry, the cost of this transportation vehicle would be reduced.
In conclusion, cycling is not popular among individuals because of some reasons such as long distances and not awareness. However, some decisions can be taken to increase public knowledge such as government funding and advertisement.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college, university or even after finding a job. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
Nowadays, the number of adults living with their parents is on the increase in some regions, even if they hold a degree or find a job. There are some upsides and downsides, but in my ,opinion the benefits of this type of living outweigh its drawbacks.
There are some positive points for grown people who prefer staying with their parents, in spite of having a career or a graduation certificate in some countries. Firstly, the costs of living decrease dramatically. for example, it could be seen that one of the major problems of alone people is the mortgage of the house and taxes which could be easily solved by sharing these expenses with their families. Secondly, as they are living with their mothers and fathers, it is less probable to suffer from depression which we can see among those who have a solitary lifestyle, and If they encounter an emotional problem, they will be supported by them. They know that there is always someone who they can talk to or share their feeling with.
On the other hand, it could be seen that living with parents has some negative points. Lack of independence is likely the biggest issue of Individuals who choose this type of livelihood. Contrary to alone people, they could not feel a sense of freedom. For instance, if they want to go out, they should inform others or if they want to hold a party, they have to get permission or coordinate with their families. in fact, these subjects convey that they apparently, have no authority over their own life.
In conclusion, Although people who are living with their parents may suffer from dependency which is some kind of limitation for them, they could benefit not only from prorating the costs but also from being safe emotionally. So I believe the pros outweigh the cons.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college, university or even after finding a job. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
Nowadays, the number of adults living with their parents is on the increase in some regions, even if they hold a degree or find a job. There are some upsides and downsides, but in my ,opinion the benefits of this type of living outweigh its drawbacks.
There are some positive points for grown people who prefer staying with their parents, in spite of having a career or a graduation certificate in some countries. Firstly, the costs of living decrease dramatically. for example, it could be seen that one of the major problems of alone people is the mortgage of the house and taxes which could be easily solved by sharing these expenses with their families. Secondly, as they are living with their mothers and fathers, it is less probable to suffer from depression which we can see among those who have a solitary lifestyle, and If they encounter an emotional problem, they will be supported by them. They know that there is always someone who they can talk to or share their feeling with.
On the other hand, it could be seen that living with parents has some negative points. Lack of independence is likely the biggest issue of Individuals who choose this type of livelihood. Contrary to alone people, they could not feel a sense of freedom. For instance, if they want to go out, they should inform others or if they want to hold a party, they have to get permission or coordinate with their families. in fact, these subjects convey that they apparently, have no authority over their own life.
In conclusion, Although people who are living with their parents may suffer from dependency which is some kind of limitation for them, they could benefit not only from prorating the costs but also from being safe emotionally. So I believe the pros outweigh the cons.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college, university or even after finding a job. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
Nowadays, the number of adults living with their parents is on the increase in some regions, even if they hold a degree or find a job. There are some upsides and downsides, but in my ,opinion the benefits of this type of living outweigh its drawbacks.
There are some positive points for grown people who prefer staying with their parents, in spite of having a career or a graduation certificate in some countries. Firstly, the costs of living decrease dramatically. for example, it could be seen that one of the major problems of alone people is the mortgage of the house and taxes which could be easily solved by sharing these expenses with their families. Secondly, as they are living with their mothers and fathers, it is less probable to suffer from depression which we can see among those who have a solitary lifestyle, and If they encounter an emotional problem, they will be supported by them. They know that there is always someone who they can talk to or share their feeling with.
On the other hand, it could be seen that living with parents has some negative points. Lack of independence is likely the biggest issue of Individuals who choose this type of livelihood. Contrary to alone people, they could not feel a sense of freedom. For instance, if they want to go out, they should inform others or if they want to hold a party, they have to get permission or coordinate with their families. in fact, these subjects convey that they apparently, have no authority over their own life.
In conclusion, Although people who are living with their parents may suffer from dependency which is some kind of limitation for them, they could benefit not only from prorating the costs but also from being safe emotionally. So I believe the pros outweigh the cons.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college, university or even after finding a job. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
Nowadays, the number of adults living with their parents is on the increase in some regions, even if they hold a degree or find a job. There are some upsides and downsides, but in my ,opinion the benefits of this type of living outweigh its drawbacks.
There are some positive points for grown people who prefer staying with their parents, in spite of having a career or a graduation certificate in some countries. Firstly, the costs of living decrease dramatically. for example, it could be seen that one of the major problems of alone people is the mortgage of the house and taxes which could be easily solved by sharing these expenses with their families. Secondly, as they are living with their mothers and fathers, it is less probable to suffer from depression which we can see among those who have a solitary lifestyle, and If they encounter an emotional problem, they will be supported by them. They know that there is always someone who they can talk to or share their feeling with.
On the other hand, it could be seen that living with parents has some negative points. Lack of independence is likely the biggest issue of Individuals who choose this type of livelihood. Contrary to alone people, they could not feel a sense of freedom. For instance, if they want to go out, they should inform others or if they want to hold a party, they have to get permission or coordinate with their families. in fact, these subjects convey that they apparently, have no authority over their own life.
In conclusion, Although people who are living with their parents may suffer from dependency which is some kind of limitation for them, they could benefit not only from prorating the costs but also from being safe emotionally. So I believe the pros outweigh the cons.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college, university or even after finding a job. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
Nowadays, the number of adults living with their parents is on the increase in some regions, even if they hold a degree or find a job. There are some upsides and downsides, but in my ,opinion the benefits of this type of living outweigh its drawbacks.
There are some positive points for grown people who prefer staying with their parents, in spite of having a career or a graduation certificate in some countries. Firstly, the costs of living decrease dramatically. for example, it could be seen that one of the major problems of alone people is the mortgage of the house and taxes which could be easily solved by sharing these expenses with their families. Secondly, as they are living with their mothers and fathers, it is less probable to suffer from depression which we can see among those who have a solitary lifestyle, and If they encounter an emotional problem, they will be supported by them. They know that there is always someone who they can talk to or share their feeling with.
On the other hand, it could be seen that living with parents has some negative points. Lack of independence is likely the biggest issue of Individuals who choose this type of livelihood. Contrary to alone people, they could not feel a sense of freedom. For instance, if they want to go out, they should inform others or if they want to hold a party, they have to get permission or coordinate with their families. in fact, these subjects convey that they apparently, have no authority over their own life.
In conclusion, Although people who are living with their parents may suffer from dependency which is some kind of limitation for them, they could benefit not only from prorating the costs but also from being safe emotionally. So I believe the pros outweigh the cons.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college, university or even after finding a job. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
Nowadays, the number of adults living with their parents is on the increase in some regions, even if they hold a degree or find a job. There are some upsides and downsides, but in my ,opinion the benefits of this type of living outweigh its drawbacks.
There are some positive points for grown people who prefer staying with their parents, in spite of having a career or a graduation certificate in some countries. Firstly, the costs of living decrease dramatically. for example, it could be seen that one of the major problems of alone people is the mortgage of the house and taxes which could be easily solved by sharing these expenses with their families. Secondly, as they are living with their mothers and fathers, it is less probable to suffer from depression which we can see among those who have a solitary lifestyle, and If they encounter an emotional problem, they will be supported by them. They know that there is always someone who they can talk to or share their feeling with.
On the other hand, it could be seen that living with parents has some negative points. Lack of independence is likely the biggest issue of Individuals who choose this type of livelihood. Contrary to alone people, they could not feel a sense of freedom. For instance, if they want to go out, they should inform others or if they want to hold a party, they have to get permission or coordinate with their families. in fact, these subjects convey that they apparently, have no authority over their own life.
In conclusion, Although people who are living with their parents may suffer from dependency which is some kind of limitation for them, they could benefit not only from prorating the costs but also from being safe emotionally. So I believe the pros outweigh the cons.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college, university or even after finding a job. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
Nowadays, the number of adults living with their parents is on the increase in some regions, even if they hold a degree or find a job. There are some upsides and downsides, but in my ,opinion the benefits of this type of living outweigh its drawbacks.
There are some positive points for grown people who prefer staying with their parents, in spite of having a career or a graduation certificate in some countries. Firstly, the costs of living decrease dramatically. for example, it could be seen that one of the major problems of alone people is the mortgage of the house and taxes which could be easily solved by sharing these expenses with their families. Secondly, as they are living with their mothers and fathers, it is less probable to suffer from depression which we can see among those who have a solitary lifestyle, and If they encounter an emotional problem, they will be supported by them. They know that there is always someone who they can talk to or share their feeling with.
On the other hand, it could be seen that living with parents has some negative points. Lack of independence is likely the biggest issue of Individuals who choose this type of livelihood. Contrary to alone people, they could not feel a sense of freedom. For instance, if they want to go out, they should inform others or if they want to hold a party, they have to get permission or coordinate with their families. in fact, these subjects convey that they apparently, have no authority over their own life.
In conclusion, Although people who are living with their parents may suffer from dependency which is some kind of limitation for them, they could benefit not only from prorating the costs but also from being safe emotionally. So I believe the pros outweigh the cons.
| Your task achievement score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries, more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college, university or even after finding a job. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
Nowadays, the number of adults living with their parents is on the increase in some regions, even if they hold a degree or find a job. There are some upsides and downsides, but in my ,opinion the benefits of this type of living outweigh its drawbacks.
There are some positive points for grown people who prefer staying with their parents, in spite of having a career or a graduation certificate in some countries. Firstly, the costs of living decrease dramatically. for example, it could be seen that one of the major problems of alone people is the mortgage of the house and taxes which could be easily solved by sharing these expenses with their families. Secondly, as they are living with their mothers and fathers, it is less probable to suffer from depression which we can see among those who have a solitary lifestyle, and If they encounter an emotional problem, they will be supported by them. They know that there is always someone who they can talk to or share their feeling with.
On the other hand, it could be seen that living with parents has some negative points. Lack of independence is likely the biggest issue of Individuals who choose this type of livelihood. Contrary to alone people, they could not feel a sense of freedom. For instance, if they want to go out, they should inform others or if they want to hold a party, they have to get permission or coordinate with their families. in fact, these subjects convey that they apparently, have no authority over their own life.
In conclusion, Although people who are living with their parents may suffer from dependency which is some kind of limitation for them, they could benefit not only from prorating the costs but also from being safe emotionally. So I believe the pros outweigh the cons.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people feel that they should not have to pay any tax and should be able to keep all of the money that they earn.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is widely believed that people shouldn’t pay any taxes and they have to keep all of the money that they earn. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view for a variety of reasons.
To begin with, income tax is an important source to build a nation. This is because tax is the money that working people pay the government for public services such as health, education, and transportation. In fact, the government uses the tax amount and provides their citizens with all basic facilities to lead a good life. For example, the authorities of India allocate about 6% of GDP for different development and welfare programs.
Furthermore, tax is a fund to secure the country’s borders. This means that the government uses this source of money to pay salaries for working people in the military and equip weapons for the soldiers. In fact, in the modern period like nowadays, although war is not a big problem, it is believed that a country which has a strong military will be one of powerful nations in the world. For example, according to Youth in 2021, the United States spent 801 billion U.S. dollars on its military, making it the country with the highest military in the world. Whist, China came to second position, having spent 293 billion U.S. dollars on their military. They both are the most powerful countries due to their strong armies.
In conclusion, paying taxes is a necessary duty of each member of the community. In my opinion, the employee should not deny paying taxes because of their essential benefits in life.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people feel that they should not have to pay any tax and should be able to keep all of the money that they earn.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is widely believed that people shouldn’t pay any taxes and they have to keep all of the money that they earn. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view for a variety of reasons.
To begin with, income tax is an important source to build a nation. This is because tax is the money that working people pay the government for public services such as health, education, and transportation. In fact, the government uses the tax amount and provides their citizens with all basic facilities to lead a good life. For example, the authorities of India allocate about 6% of GDP for different development and welfare programs.
Furthermore, tax is a fund to secure the country’s borders. This means that the government uses this source of money to pay salaries for working people in the military and equip weapons for the soldiers. In fact, in the modern period like nowadays, although war is not a big problem, it is believed that a country which has a strong military will be one of powerful nations in the world. For example, according to Youth in 2021, the United States spent 801 billion U.S. dollars on its military, making it the country with the highest military in the world. Whist, China came to second position, having spent 293 billion U.S. dollars on their military. They both are the most powerful countries due to their strong armies.
In conclusion, paying taxes is a necessary duty of each member of the community. In my opinion, the employee should not deny paying taxes because of their essential benefits in life.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people feel that they should not have to pay any tax and should be able to keep all of the money that they earn.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is widely believed that people shouldn’t pay any taxes and they have to keep all of the money that they earn. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view for a variety of reasons.
To begin with, income tax is an important source to build a nation. This is because tax is the money that working people pay the government for public services such as health, education, and transportation. In fact, the government uses the tax amount and provides their citizens with all basic facilities to lead a good life. For example, the authorities of India allocate about 6% of GDP for different development and welfare programs.
Furthermore, tax is a fund to secure the country’s borders. This means that the government uses this source of money to pay salaries for working people in the military and equip weapons for the soldiers. In fact, in the modern period like nowadays, although war is not a big problem, it is believed that a country which has a strong military will be one of powerful nations in the world. For example, according to Youth in 2021, the United States spent 801 billion U.S. dollars on its military, making it the country with the highest military in the world. Whist, China came to second position, having spent 293 billion U.S. dollars on their military. They both are the most powerful countries due to their strong armies.
In conclusion, paying taxes is a necessary duty of each member of the community. In my opinion, the employee should not deny paying taxes because of their essential benefits in life.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people feel that they should not have to pay any tax and should be able to keep all of the money that they earn.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is widely believed that people shouldn’t pay any taxes and they have to keep all of the money that they earn. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view for a variety of reasons.
To begin with, income tax is an important source to build a nation. This is because tax is the money that working people pay the government for public services such as health, education, and transportation. In fact, the government uses the tax amount and provides their citizens with all basic facilities to lead a good life. For example, the authorities of India allocate about 6% of GDP for different development and welfare programs.
Furthermore, tax is a fund to secure the country’s borders. This means that the government uses this source of money to pay salaries for working people in the military and equip weapons for the soldiers. In fact, in the modern period like nowadays, although war is not a big problem, it is believed that a country which has a strong military will be one of powerful nations in the world. For example, according to Youth in 2021, the United States spent 801 billion U.S. dollars on its military, making it the country with the highest military in the world. Whist, China came to second position, having spent 293 billion U.S. dollars on their military. They both are the most powerful countries due to their strong armies.
In conclusion, paying taxes is a necessary duty of each member of the community. In my opinion, the employee should not deny paying taxes because of their essential benefits in life.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people feel that they should not have to pay any tax and should be able to keep all of the money that they earn.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is widely believed that people shouldn’t pay any taxes and they have to keep all of the money that they earn. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view for a variety of reasons.
To begin with, income tax is an important source to build a nation. This is because tax is the money that working people pay the government for public services such as health, education, and transportation. In fact, the government uses the tax amount and provides their citizens with all basic facilities to lead a good life. For example, the authorities of India allocate about 6% of GDP for different development and welfare programs.
Furthermore, tax is a fund to secure the country’s borders. This means that the government uses this source of money to pay salaries for working people in the military and equip weapons for the soldiers. In fact, in the modern period like nowadays, although war is not a big problem, it is believed that a country which has a strong military will be one of powerful nations in the world. For example, according to Youth in 2021, the United States spent 801 billion U.S. dollars on its military, making it the country with the highest military in the world. Whist, China came to second position, having spent 293 billion U.S. dollars on their military. They both are the most powerful countries due to their strong armies.
In conclusion, paying taxes is a necessary duty of each member of the community. In my opinion, the employee should not deny paying taxes because of their essential benefits in life.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people feel that they should not have to pay any tax and should be able to keep all of the money that they earn.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is widely believed that people shouldn’t pay any taxes and they have to keep all of the money that they earn. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view for a variety of reasons.
To begin with, income tax is an important source to build a nation. This is because tax is the money that working people pay the government for public services such as health, education, and transportation. In fact, the government uses the tax amount and provides their citizens with all basic facilities to lead a good life. For example, the authorities of India allocate about 6% of GDP for different development and welfare programs.
Furthermore, tax is a fund to secure the country’s borders. This means that the government uses this source of money to pay salaries for working people in the military and equip weapons for the soldiers. In fact, in the modern period like nowadays, although war is not a big problem, it is believed that a country which has a strong military will be one of powerful nations in the world. For example, according to Youth in 2021, the United States spent 801 billion U.S. dollars on its military, making it the country with the highest military in the world. Whist, China came to second position, having spent 293 billion U.S. dollars on their military. They both are the most powerful countries due to their strong armies.
In conclusion, paying taxes is a necessary duty of each member of the community. In my opinion, the employee should not deny paying taxes because of their essential benefits in life.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people feel that they should not have to pay any tax and should be able to keep all of the money that they earn.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is widely believed that people shouldn’t pay any taxes and they have to keep all of the money that they earn. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view for a variety of reasons.
To begin with, income tax is an important source to build a nation. This is because tax is the money that working people pay the government for public services such as health, education, and transportation. In fact, the government uses the tax amount and provides their citizens with all basic facilities to lead a good life. For example, the authorities of India allocate about 6% of GDP for different development and welfare programs.
Furthermore, tax is a fund to secure the country’s borders. This means that the government uses this source of money to pay salaries for working people in the military and equip weapons for the soldiers. In fact, in the modern period like nowadays, although war is not a big problem, it is believed that a country which has a strong military will be one of powerful nations in the world. For example, according to Youth in 2021, the United States spent 801 billion U.S. dollars on its military, making it the country with the highest military in the world. Whist, China came to second position, having spent 293 billion U.S. dollars on their military. They both are the most powerful countries due to their strong armies.
In conclusion, paying taxes is a necessary duty of each member of the community. In my opinion, the employee should not deny paying taxes because of their essential benefits in life.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people feel that they should not have to pay any tax and should be able to keep all of the money that they earn.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
It is widely believed that people shouldn’t pay any taxes and they have to keep all of the money that they earn. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view for a variety of reasons.
To begin with, income tax is an important source to build a nation. This is because tax is the money that working people pay the government for public services such as health, education, and transportation. In fact, the government uses the tax amount and provides their citizens with all basic facilities to lead a good life. For example, the authorities of India allocate about 6% of GDP for different development and welfare programs.
Furthermore, tax is a fund to secure the country’s borders. This means that the government uses this source of money to pay salaries for working people in the military and equip weapons for the soldiers. In fact, in the modern period like nowadays, although war is not a big problem, it is believed that a country which has a strong military will be one of powerful nations in the world. For example, according to Youth in 2021, the United States spent 801 billion U.S. dollars on its military, making it the country with the highest military in the world. Whist, China came to second position, having spent 293 billion U.S. dollars on their military. They both are the most powerful countries due to their strong armies.
In conclusion, paying taxes is a necessary duty of each member of the community. In my opinion, the employee should not deny paying taxes because of their essential benefits in life.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
The use of social media such as Facebook or Twitter is replacing face-to-face contact this century.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
The usage of social media has been increasing rapidly since this century. Some people believe this growing trend has a detrimental impact on face-to-face communication, whereas I believe contracting via these tools has significant benefits.
The usage of cutting-edge communicational technologies in recent decades has improved significantly. Some individuals claim that while we are using them, we will lose our sense of having in-person speaking. They say that this is because people feel that if we spend with others online, this would be enough for them. In contrast, this will make them more socially isolated in society. Additionally, people will considerably less engage in effective communication activities outdoors in communities, while they can talk and share their ideas online. Consequently, they argue, this will definitely die out the sense of belonging in human beings.
However, I believe these arguments cannot hinder us from using the advantages of social media. The reason is that many individuals are living far from their loved ones. Therefore, the only chance for them to see their family and friends is through social media. For instance, thanks to significant developments in media, an abroad student who lives in Canada can see his or her parents online with the help of apps like Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp. This will result in a decrease in the level of worry and anxiety between humans. Moreover, there are many online community-based forms in many apps such as Reddit or Twitter which helps folks to share their personal experience to help others. This will not only promote a sensibility of morality between us but also effects dramatically on our sympathy.
To conclude, Although some individuals advocate that social media is harming our in-personal contact, I believe there are substantial advantages like fostering a sense of sympathy and morality between humans and reducing some bad feelings in our communications which can surpass the downsides of this development.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
The use of social media such as Facebook or Twitter is replacing face-to-face contact this century.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
The usage of social media has been increasing rapidly since this century. Some people believe this growing trend has a detrimental impact on face-to-face communication, whereas I believe contracting via these tools has significant benefits.
The usage of cutting-edge communicational technologies in recent decades has improved significantly. Some individuals claim that while we are using them, we will lose our sense of having in-person speaking. They say that this is because people feel that if we spend with others online, this would be enough for them. In contrast, this will make them more socially isolated in society. Additionally, people will considerably less engage in effective communication activities outdoors in communities, while they can talk and share their ideas online. Consequently, they argue, this will definitely die out the sense of belonging in human beings.
However, I believe these arguments cannot hinder us from using the advantages of social media. The reason is that many individuals are living far from their loved ones. Therefore, the only chance for them to see their family and friends is through social media. For instance, thanks to significant developments in media, an abroad student who lives in Canada can see his or her parents online with the help of apps like Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp. This will result in a decrease in the level of worry and anxiety between humans. Moreover, there are many online community-based forms in many apps such as Reddit or Twitter which helps folks to share their personal experience to help others. This will not only promote a sensibility of morality between us but also effects dramatically on our sympathy.
To conclude, Although some individuals advocate that social media is harming our in-personal contact, I believe there are substantial advantages like fostering a sense of sympathy and morality between humans and reducing some bad feelings in our communications which can surpass the downsides of this development.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
The use of social media such as Facebook or Twitter is replacing face-to-face contact this century.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
The usage of social media has been increasing rapidly since this century. Some people believe this growing trend has a detrimental impact on face-to-face communication, whereas I believe contracting via these tools has significant benefits.
The usage of cutting-edge communicational technologies in recent decades has improved significantly. Some individuals claim that while we are using them, we will lose our sense of having in-person speaking. They say that this is because people feel that if we spend with others online, this would be enough for them. In contrast, this will make them more socially isolated in society. Additionally, people will considerably less engage in effective communication activities outdoors in communities, while they can talk and share their ideas online. Consequently, they argue, this will definitely die out the sense of belonging in human beings.
However, I believe these arguments cannot hinder us from using the advantages of social media. The reason is that many individuals are living far from their loved ones. Therefore, the only chance for them to see their family and friends is through social media. For instance, thanks to significant developments in media, an abroad student who lives in Canada can see his or her parents online with the help of apps like Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp. This will result in a decrease in the level of worry and anxiety between humans. Moreover, there are many online community-based forms in many apps such as Reddit or Twitter which helps folks to share their personal experience to help others. This will not only promote a sensibility of morality between us but also effects dramatically on our sympathy.
To conclude, Although some individuals advocate that social media is harming our in-personal contact, I believe there are substantial advantages like fostering a sense of sympathy and morality between humans and reducing some bad feelings in our communications which can surpass the downsides of this development.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
The use of social media such as Facebook or Twitter is replacing face-to-face contact this century.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
The usage of social media has been increasing rapidly since this century. Some people believe this growing trend has a detrimental impact on face-to-face communication, whereas I believe contracting via these tools has significant benefits.
The usage of cutting-edge communicational technologies in recent decades has improved significantly. Some individuals claim that while we are using them, we will lose our sense of having in-person speaking. They say that this is because people feel that if we spend with others online, this would be enough for them. In contrast, this will make them more socially isolated in society. Additionally, people will considerably less engage in effective communication activities outdoors in communities, while they can talk and share their ideas online. Consequently, they argue, this will definitely die out the sense of belonging in human beings.
However, I believe these arguments cannot hinder us from using the advantages of social media. The reason is that many individuals are living far from their loved ones. Therefore, the only chance for them to see their family and friends is through social media. For instance, thanks to significant developments in media, an abroad student who lives in Canada can see his or her parents online with the help of apps like Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp. This will result in a decrease in the level of worry and anxiety between humans. Moreover, there are many online community-based forms in many apps such as Reddit or Twitter which helps folks to share their personal experience to help others. This will not only promote a sensibility of morality between us but also effects dramatically on our sympathy.
To conclude, Although some individuals advocate that social media is harming our in-personal contact, I believe there are substantial advantages like fostering a sense of sympathy and morality between humans and reducing some bad feelings in our communications which can surpass the downsides of this development.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
The use of social media such as Facebook or Twitter is replacing face-to-face contact this century.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
The usage of social media has been increasing rapidly since this century. Some people believe this growing trend has a detrimental impact on face-to-face communication, whereas I believe contracting via these tools has significant benefits.
The usage of cutting-edge communicational technologies in recent decades has improved significantly. Some individuals claim that while we are using them, we will lose our sense of having in-person speaking. They say that this is because people feel that if we spend with others online, this would be enough for them. In contrast, this will make them more socially isolated in society. Additionally, people will considerably less engage in effective communication activities outdoors in communities, while they can talk and share their ideas online. Consequently, they argue, this will definitely die out the sense of belonging in human beings.
However, I believe these arguments cannot hinder us from using the advantages of social media. The reason is that many individuals are living far from their loved ones. Therefore, the only chance for them to see their family and friends is through social media. For instance, thanks to significant developments in media, an abroad student who lives in Canada can see his or her parents online with the help of apps like Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp. This will result in a decrease in the level of worry and anxiety between humans. Moreover, there are many online community-based forms in many apps such as Reddit or Twitter which helps folks to share their personal experience to help others. This will not only promote a sensibility of morality between us but also effects dramatically on our sympathy.
To conclude, Although some individuals advocate that social media is harming our in-personal contact, I believe there are substantial advantages like fostering a sense of sympathy and morality between humans and reducing some bad feelings in our communications which can surpass the downsides of this development.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
The use of social media such as Facebook or Twitter is replacing face-to-face contact this century.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
The usage of social media has been increasing rapidly since this century. Some people believe this growing trend has a detrimental impact on face-to-face communication, whereas I believe contracting via these tools has significant benefits.
The usage of cutting-edge communicational technologies in recent decades has improved significantly. Some individuals claim that while we are using them, we will lose our sense of having in-person speaking. They say that this is because people feel that if we spend with others online, this would be enough for them. In contrast, this will make them more socially isolated in society. Additionally, people will considerably less engage in effective communication activities outdoors in communities, while they can talk and share their ideas online. Consequently, they argue, this will definitely die out the sense of belonging in human beings.
However, I believe these arguments cannot hinder us from using the advantages of social media. The reason is that many individuals are living far from their loved ones. Therefore, the only chance for them to see their family and friends is through social media. For instance, thanks to significant developments in media, an abroad student who lives in Canada can see his or her parents online with the help of apps like Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp. This will result in a decrease in the level of worry and anxiety between humans. Moreover, there are many online community-based forms in many apps such as Reddit or Twitter which helps folks to share their personal experience to help others. This will not only promote a sensibility of morality between us but also effects dramatically on our sympathy.
To conclude, Although some individuals advocate that social media is harming our in-personal contact, I believe there are substantial advantages like fostering a sense of sympathy and morality between humans and reducing some bad feelings in our communications which can surpass the downsides of this development.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
The use of social media such as Facebook or Twitter is replacing face-to-face contact this century.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
The usage of social media has been increasing rapidly since this century. Some people believe this growing trend has a detrimental impact on face-to-face communication, whereas I believe contracting via these tools has significant benefits.
The usage of cutting-edge communicational technologies in recent decades has improved significantly. Some individuals claim that while we are using them, we will lose our sense of having in-person speaking. They say that this is because people feel that if we spend with others online, this would be enough for them. In contrast, this will make them more socially isolated in society. Additionally, people will considerably less engage in effective communication activities outdoors in communities, while they can talk and share their ideas online. Consequently, they argue, this will definitely die out the sense of belonging in human beings.
However, I believe these arguments cannot hinder us from using the advantages of social media. The reason is that many individuals are living far from their loved ones. Therefore, the only chance for them to see their family and friends is through social media. For instance, thanks to significant developments in media, an abroad student who lives in Canada can see his or her parents online with the help of apps like Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp. This will result in a decrease in the level of worry and anxiety between humans. Moreover, there are many online community-based forms in many apps such as Reddit or Twitter which helps folks to share their personal experience to help others. This will not only promote a sensibility of morality between us but also effects dramatically on our sympathy.
To conclude, Although some individuals advocate that social media is harming our in-personal contact, I believe there are substantial advantages like fostering a sense of sympathy and morality between humans and reducing some bad feelings in our communications which can surpass the downsides of this development.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
The use of social media such as Facebook or Twitter is replacing face-to-face contact this century.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
The usage of social media has been increasing rapidly since this century. Some people believe this growing trend has a detrimental impact on face-to-face communication, whereas I believe contracting via these tools has significant benefits.
The usage of cutting-edge communicational technologies in recent decades has improved significantly. Some individuals claim that while we are using them, we will lose our sense of having in-person speaking. They say that this is because people feel that if we spend with others online, this would be enough for them. In contrast, this will make them more socially isolated in society. Additionally, people will considerably less engage in effective communication activities outdoors in communities, while they can talk and share their ideas online. Consequently, they argue, this will definitely die out the sense of belonging in human beings.
However, I believe these arguments cannot hinder us from using the advantages of social media. The reason is that many individuals are living far from their loved ones. Therefore, the only chance for them to see their family and friends is through social media. For instance, thanks to significant developments in media, an abroad student who lives in Canada can see his or her parents online with the help of apps like Facebook, Skype, or WhatsApp. This will result in a decrease in the level of worry and anxiety between humans. Moreover, there are many online community-based forms in many apps such as Reddit or Twitter which helps folks to share their personal experience to help others. This will not only promote a sensibility of morality between us but also effects dramatically on our sympathy.
To conclude, Although some individuals advocate that social media is harming our in-personal contact, I believe there are substantial advantages like fostering a sense of sympathy and morality between humans and reducing some bad feelings in our communications which can surpass the downsides of this development.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
International travel brings benefits to travellers and the countries visited, but it also harms for the environment. Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Nature is one of the places that attract many tourists around the world. Although they are often doing inappropriate things towards nature, I believe that they contribute a lot to the locals' economy.
On the one hand, the main drawback of visitors to states is they have a lack of awareness and respect for the host countries. To begin with, irresponsible travellers tend to show their lack of awareness and empathy towards nature, such as smoking in forests which can cause wildfire, and throwing their food waste anywhere. People could easily meet this evidence in famous places, and most of them already took serious action and warning towards those visitors. Besides this, international travellers show an inappropriate attitude that breaks the rules, as the travellers do not really care to understand and do some research about the host countries' culture and laws. Consequently, specific communities are not really excited about international visitors coming to their land.
On the other hand, the brighter side of this phenomenon is tourists hugely contribute to the region's income. The foremost one is small businesses near tourist attractions always crowded by consumers as they will buy souvenirs. In fact, they would make huge purchases for people in their home states, this also could make the host countries become popular overseas. Secondly, despite the small businesses which sell products, local restaurants also gain huge profits from them. For example, Indonesia is very famous for its cuisine and when international people come, it is a mandatory activity to try foods here. Therefore, purchasing power from visitors overseas is huge, which can thus make the locals acquire financial benefits.
In conclusion, while tourists could harm the environment as they lack knowledge and empathy, they will paramountly contribute to the national income of the host land. However, I am firmly convinced that the demerits are eclipsed by the merits.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
International travel brings benefits to travellers and the countries visited, but it also harms for the environment. Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Nature is one of the places that attract many tourists around the world. Although they are often doing inappropriate things towards nature, I believe that they contribute a lot to the locals' economy.
On the one hand, the main drawback of visitors to states is they have a lack of awareness and respect for the host countries. To begin with, irresponsible travellers tend to show their lack of awareness and empathy towards nature, such as smoking in forests which can cause wildfire, and throwing their food waste anywhere. People could easily meet this evidence in famous places, and most of them already took serious action and warning towards those visitors. Besides this, international travellers show an inappropriate attitude that breaks the rules, as the travellers do not really care to understand and do some research about the host countries' culture and laws. Consequently, specific communities are not really excited about international visitors coming to their land.
On the other hand, the brighter side of this phenomenon is tourists hugely contribute to the region's income. The foremost one is small businesses near tourist attractions always crowded by consumers as they will buy souvenirs. In fact, they would make huge purchases for people in their home states, this also could make the host countries become popular overseas. Secondly, despite the small businesses which sell products, local restaurants also gain huge profits from them. For example, Indonesia is very famous for its cuisine and when international people come, it is a mandatory activity to try foods here. Therefore, purchasing power from visitors overseas is huge, which can thus make the locals acquire financial benefits.
In conclusion, while tourists could harm the environment as they lack knowledge and empathy, they will paramountly contribute to the national income of the host land. However, I am firmly convinced that the demerits are eclipsed by the merits.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
International travel brings benefits to travellers and the countries visited, but it also harms for the environment. Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Nature is one of the places that attract many tourists around the world. Although they are often doing inappropriate things towards nature, I believe that they contribute a lot to the locals' economy.
On the one hand, the main drawback of visitors to states is they have a lack of awareness and respect for the host countries. To begin with, irresponsible travellers tend to show their lack of awareness and empathy towards nature, such as smoking in forests which can cause wildfire, and throwing their food waste anywhere. People could easily meet this evidence in famous places, and most of them already took serious action and warning towards those visitors. Besides this, international travellers show an inappropriate attitude that breaks the rules, as the travellers do not really care to understand and do some research about the host countries' culture and laws. Consequently, specific communities are not really excited about international visitors coming to their land.
On the other hand, the brighter side of this phenomenon is tourists hugely contribute to the region's income. The foremost one is small businesses near tourist attractions always crowded by consumers as they will buy souvenirs. In fact, they would make huge purchases for people in their home states, this also could make the host countries become popular overseas. Secondly, despite the small businesses which sell products, local restaurants also gain huge profits from them. For example, Indonesia is very famous for its cuisine and when international people come, it is a mandatory activity to try foods here. Therefore, purchasing power from visitors overseas is huge, which can thus make the locals acquire financial benefits.
In conclusion, while tourists could harm the environment as they lack knowledge and empathy, they will paramountly contribute to the national income of the host land. However, I am firmly convinced that the demerits are eclipsed by the merits.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
International travel brings benefits to travellers and the countries visited, but it also harms for the environment. Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Nature is one of the places that attract many tourists around the world. Although they are often doing inappropriate things towards nature, I believe that they contribute a lot to the locals' economy.
On the one hand, the main drawback of visitors to states is they have a lack of awareness and respect for the host countries. To begin with, irresponsible travellers tend to show their lack of awareness and empathy towards nature, such as smoking in forests which can cause wildfire, and throwing their food waste anywhere. People could easily meet this evidence in famous places, and most of them already took serious action and warning towards those visitors. Besides this, international travellers show an inappropriate attitude that breaks the rules, as the travellers do not really care to understand and do some research about the host countries' culture and laws. Consequently, specific communities are not really excited about international visitors coming to their land.
On the other hand, the brighter side of this phenomenon is tourists hugely contribute to the region's income. The foremost one is small businesses near tourist attractions always crowded by consumers as they will buy souvenirs. In fact, they would make huge purchases for people in their home states, this also could make the host countries become popular overseas. Secondly, despite the small businesses which sell products, local restaurants also gain huge profits from them. For example, Indonesia is very famous for its cuisine and when international people come, it is a mandatory activity to try foods here. Therefore, purchasing power from visitors overseas is huge, which can thus make the locals acquire financial benefits.
In conclusion, while tourists could harm the environment as they lack knowledge and empathy, they will paramountly contribute to the national income of the host land. However, I am firmly convinced that the demerits are eclipsed by the merits.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
International travel brings benefits to travellers and the countries visited, but it also harms for the environment. Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Nature is one of the places that attract many tourists around the world. Although they are often doing inappropriate things towards nature, I believe that they contribute a lot to the locals' economy.
On the one hand, the main drawback of visitors to states is they have a lack of awareness and respect for the host countries. To begin with, irresponsible travellers tend to show their lack of awareness and empathy towards nature, such as smoking in forests which can cause wildfire, and throwing their food waste anywhere. People could easily meet this evidence in famous places, and most of them already took serious action and warning towards those visitors. Besides this, international travellers show an inappropriate attitude that breaks the rules, as the travellers do not really care to understand and do some research about the host countries' culture and laws. Consequently, specific communities are not really excited about international visitors coming to their land.
On the other hand, the brighter side of this phenomenon is tourists hugely contribute to the region's income. The foremost one is small businesses near tourist attractions always crowded by consumers as they will buy souvenirs. In fact, they would make huge purchases for people in their home states, this also could make the host countries become popular overseas. Secondly, despite the small businesses which sell products, local restaurants also gain huge profits from them. For example, Indonesia is very famous for its cuisine and when international people come, it is a mandatory activity to try foods here. Therefore, purchasing power from visitors overseas is huge, which can thus make the locals acquire financial benefits.
In conclusion, while tourists could harm the environment as they lack knowledge and empathy, they will paramountly contribute to the national income of the host land. However, I am firmly convinced that the demerits are eclipsed by the merits.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
International travel brings benefits to travellers and the countries visited, but it also harms for the environment. Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Nature is one of the places that attract many tourists around the world. Although they are often doing inappropriate things towards nature, I believe that they contribute a lot to the locals' economy.
On the one hand, the main drawback of visitors to states is they have a lack of awareness and respect for the host countries. To begin with, irresponsible travellers tend to show their lack of awareness and empathy towards nature, such as smoking in forests which can cause wildfire, and throwing their food waste anywhere. People could easily meet this evidence in famous places, and most of them already took serious action and warning towards those visitors. Besides this, international travellers show an inappropriate attitude that breaks the rules, as the travellers do not really care to understand and do some research about the host countries' culture and laws. Consequently, specific communities are not really excited about international visitors coming to their land.
On the other hand, the brighter side of this phenomenon is tourists hugely contribute to the region's income. The foremost one is small businesses near tourist attractions always crowded by consumers as they will buy souvenirs. In fact, they would make huge purchases for people in their home states, this also could make the host countries become popular overseas. Secondly, despite the small businesses which sell products, local restaurants also gain huge profits from them. For example, Indonesia is very famous for its cuisine and when international people come, it is a mandatory activity to try foods here. Therefore, purchasing power from visitors overseas is huge, which can thus make the locals acquire financial benefits.
In conclusion, while tourists could harm the environment as they lack knowledge and empathy, they will paramountly contribute to the national income of the host land. However, I am firmly convinced that the demerits are eclipsed by the merits.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
International travel brings benefits to travellers and the countries visited, but it also harms for the environment. Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Nature is one of the places that attract many tourists around the world. Although they are often doing inappropriate things towards nature, I believe that they contribute a lot to the locals' economy.
On the one hand, the main drawback of visitors to states is they have a lack of awareness and respect for the host countries. To begin with, irresponsible travellers tend to show their lack of awareness and empathy towards nature, such as smoking in forests which can cause wildfire, and throwing their food waste anywhere. People could easily meet this evidence in famous places, and most of them already took serious action and warning towards those visitors. Besides this, international travellers show an inappropriate attitude that breaks the rules, as the travellers do not really care to understand and do some research about the host countries' culture and laws. Consequently, specific communities are not really excited about international visitors coming to their land.
On the other hand, the brighter side of this phenomenon is tourists hugely contribute to the region's income. The foremost one is small businesses near tourist attractions always crowded by consumers as they will buy souvenirs. In fact, they would make huge purchases for people in their home states, this also could make the host countries become popular overseas. Secondly, despite the small businesses which sell products, local restaurants also gain huge profits from them. For example, Indonesia is very famous for its cuisine and when international people come, it is a mandatory activity to try foods here. Therefore, purchasing power from visitors overseas is huge, which can thus make the locals acquire financial benefits.
In conclusion, while tourists could harm the environment as they lack knowledge and empathy, they will paramountly contribute to the national income of the host land. However, I am firmly convinced that the demerits are eclipsed by the merits.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
International travel brings benefits to travellers and the countries visited, but it also harms for the environment. Do the disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Nature is one of the places that attract many tourists around the world. Although they are often doing inappropriate things towards nature, I believe that they contribute a lot to the locals' economy.
On the one hand, the main drawback of visitors to states is they have a lack of awareness and respect for the host countries. To begin with, irresponsible travellers tend to show their lack of awareness and empathy towards nature, such as smoking in forests which can cause wildfire, and throwing their food waste anywhere. People could easily meet this evidence in famous places, and most of them already took serious action and warning towards those visitors. Besides this, international travellers show an inappropriate attitude that breaks the rules, as the travellers do not really care to understand and do some research about the host countries' culture and laws. Consequently, specific communities are not really excited about international visitors coming to their land.
On the other hand, the brighter side of this phenomenon is tourists hugely contribute to the region's income. The foremost one is small businesses near tourist attractions always crowded by consumers as they will buy souvenirs. In fact, they would make huge purchases for people in their home states, this also could make the host countries become popular overseas. Secondly, despite the small businesses which sell products, local restaurants also gain huge profits from them. For example, Indonesia is very famous for its cuisine and when international people come, it is a mandatory activity to try foods here. Therefore, purchasing power from visitors overseas is huge, which can thus make the locals acquire financial benefits.
In conclusion, while tourists could harm the environment as they lack knowledge and empathy, they will paramountly contribute to the national income of the host land. However, I am firmly convinced that the demerits are eclipsed by the merits.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extend to you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Anwser:
It is crucial for juveniles to understand the differences between right and wrong when they are very young. Punishing is an important way to help them find out more about the distinctions. I completely agree with this statement and believe that some punishments are necessary during upbringing.
It is imperative to differentiate bad and good traits for children when they are still very young because the early stages of life are the era during which one’s personality forms and it is the best age to familiarize the young generation with humans’ intrinsic values and morals. Furthermore, when the child is very young he or she is more likely to pick up good and bad behaviors from others and follow them. In this case, mothers and fathers should try and explain moral principles in an easy and convincing way and if the child does not accept his or her impolite behaviour, parents have to take more serious actions such as grounding the child to teach him or her a lesson. I believe that imposing moderate punishments definitely plays an important role in raising children.
Although corporal punishments are not recommended, parents and teachers should be allowed to use other methods such as grounding them or giving them time outs because extolling them when they do something right in order to promote that trait is not always useful and can spoil them over time. On the other hand, punishing does not always have to be cruel. For instance, it is amazing how using inspiring stories and poems that are based on promoting ethics can be helpful in instilling good values in children and informing them indirectly that they have misbehaved.
In conclusion, I agree that teaching the young manners and good deeds as well as including more strictness such as grounding is very important in bringing up.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extend to you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Anwser:
It is crucial for juveniles to understand the differences between right and wrong when they are very young. Punishing is an important way to help them find out more about the distinctions. I completely agree with this statement and believe that some punishments are necessary during upbringing.
It is imperative to differentiate bad and good traits for children when they are still very young because the early stages of life are the era during which one’s personality forms and it is the best age to familiarize the young generation with humans’ intrinsic values and morals. Furthermore, when the child is very young he or she is more likely to pick up good and bad behaviors from others and follow them. In this case, mothers and fathers should try and explain moral principles in an easy and convincing way and if the child does not accept his or her impolite behaviour, parents have to take more serious actions such as grounding the child to teach him or her a lesson. I believe that imposing moderate punishments definitely plays an important role in raising children.
Although corporal punishments are not recommended, parents and teachers should be allowed to use other methods such as grounding them or giving them time outs because extolling them when they do something right in order to promote that trait is not always useful and can spoil them over time. On the other hand, punishing does not always have to be cruel. For instance, it is amazing how using inspiring stories and poems that are based on promoting ethics can be helpful in instilling good values in children and informing them indirectly that they have misbehaved.
In conclusion, I agree that teaching the young manners and good deeds as well as including more strictness such as grounding is very important in bringing up.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extend to you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Anwser:
It is crucial for juveniles to understand the differences between right and wrong when they are very young. Punishing is an important way to help them find out more about the distinctions. I completely agree with this statement and believe that some punishments are necessary during upbringing.
It is imperative to differentiate bad and good traits for children when they are still very young because the early stages of life are the era during which one’s personality forms and it is the best age to familiarize the young generation with humans’ intrinsic values and morals. Furthermore, when the child is very young he or she is more likely to pick up good and bad behaviors from others and follow them. In this case, mothers and fathers should try and explain moral principles in an easy and convincing way and if the child does not accept his or her impolite behaviour, parents have to take more serious actions such as grounding the child to teach him or her a lesson. I believe that imposing moderate punishments definitely plays an important role in raising children.
Although corporal punishments are not recommended, parents and teachers should be allowed to use other methods such as grounding them or giving them time outs because extolling them when they do something right in order to promote that trait is not always useful and can spoil them over time. On the other hand, punishing does not always have to be cruel. For instance, it is amazing how using inspiring stories and poems that are based on promoting ethics can be helpful in instilling good values in children and informing them indirectly that they have misbehaved.
In conclusion, I agree that teaching the young manners and good deeds as well as including more strictness such as grounding is very important in bringing up.
| Your lexical resource score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extend to you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Anwser:
It is crucial for juveniles to understand the differences between right and wrong when they are very young. Punishing is an important way to help them find out more about the distinctions. I completely agree with this statement and believe that some punishments are necessary during upbringing.
It is imperative to differentiate bad and good traits for children when they are still very young because the early stages of life are the era during which one’s personality forms and it is the best age to familiarize the young generation with humans’ intrinsic values and morals. Furthermore, when the child is very young he or she is more likely to pick up good and bad behaviors from others and follow them. In this case, mothers and fathers should try and explain moral principles in an easy and convincing way and if the child does not accept his or her impolite behaviour, parents have to take more serious actions such as grounding the child to teach him or her a lesson. I believe that imposing moderate punishments definitely plays an important role in raising children.
Although corporal punishments are not recommended, parents and teachers should be allowed to use other methods such as grounding them or giving them time outs because extolling them when they do something right in order to promote that trait is not always useful and can spoil them over time. On the other hand, punishing does not always have to be cruel. For instance, it is amazing how using inspiring stories and poems that are based on promoting ethics can be helpful in instilling good values in children and informing them indirectly that they have misbehaved.
In conclusion, I agree that teaching the young manners and good deeds as well as including more strictness such as grounding is very important in bringing up.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extend to you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Anwser:
It is crucial for juveniles to understand the differences between right and wrong when they are very young. Punishing is an important way to help them find out more about the distinctions. I completely agree with this statement and believe that some punishments are necessary during upbringing.
It is imperative to differentiate bad and good traits for children when they are still very young because the early stages of life are the era during which one’s personality forms and it is the best age to familiarize the young generation with humans’ intrinsic values and morals. Furthermore, when the child is very young he or she is more likely to pick up good and bad behaviors from others and follow them. In this case, mothers and fathers should try and explain moral principles in an easy and convincing way and if the child does not accept his or her impolite behaviour, parents have to take more serious actions such as grounding the child to teach him or her a lesson. I believe that imposing moderate punishments definitely plays an important role in raising children.
Although corporal punishments are not recommended, parents and teachers should be allowed to use other methods such as grounding them or giving them time outs because extolling them when they do something right in order to promote that trait is not always useful and can spoil them over time. On the other hand, punishing does not always have to be cruel. For instance, it is amazing how using inspiring stories and poems that are based on promoting ethics can be helpful in instilling good values in children and informing them indirectly that they have misbehaved.
In conclusion, I agree that teaching the young manners and good deeds as well as including more strictness such as grounding is very important in bringing up.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extend to you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Anwser:
It is crucial for juveniles to understand the differences between right and wrong when they are very young. Punishing is an important way to help them find out more about the distinctions. I completely agree with this statement and believe that some punishments are necessary during upbringing.
It is imperative to differentiate bad and good traits for children when they are still very young because the early stages of life are the era during which one’s personality forms and it is the best age to familiarize the young generation with humans’ intrinsic values and morals. Furthermore, when the child is very young he or she is more likely to pick up good and bad behaviors from others and follow them. In this case, mothers and fathers should try and explain moral principles in an easy and convincing way and if the child does not accept his or her impolite behaviour, parents have to take more serious actions such as grounding the child to teach him or her a lesson. I believe that imposing moderate punishments definitely plays an important role in raising children.
Although corporal punishments are not recommended, parents and teachers should be allowed to use other methods such as grounding them or giving them time outs because extolling them when they do something right in order to promote that trait is not always useful and can spoil them over time. On the other hand, punishing does not always have to be cruel. For instance, it is amazing how using inspiring stories and poems that are based on promoting ethics can be helpful in instilling good values in children and informing them indirectly that they have misbehaved.
In conclusion, I agree that teaching the young manners and good deeds as well as including more strictness such as grounding is very important in bringing up.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extend to you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Anwser:
It is crucial for juveniles to understand the differences between right and wrong when they are very young. Punishing is an important way to help them find out more about the distinctions. I completely agree with this statement and believe that some punishments are necessary during upbringing.
It is imperative to differentiate bad and good traits for children when they are still very young because the early stages of life are the era during which one’s personality forms and it is the best age to familiarize the young generation with humans’ intrinsic values and morals. Furthermore, when the child is very young he or she is more likely to pick up good and bad behaviors from others and follow them. In this case, mothers and fathers should try and explain moral principles in an easy and convincing way and if the child does not accept his or her impolite behaviour, parents have to take more serious actions such as grounding the child to teach him or her a lesson. I believe that imposing moderate punishments definitely plays an important role in raising children.
Although corporal punishments are not recommended, parents and teachers should be allowed to use other methods such as grounding them or giving them time outs because extolling them when they do something right in order to promote that trait is not always useful and can spoil them over time. On the other hand, punishing does not always have to be cruel. For instance, it is amazing how using inspiring stories and poems that are based on promoting ethics can be helpful in instilling good values in children and informing them indirectly that they have misbehaved.
In conclusion, I agree that teaching the young manners and good deeds as well as including more strictness such as grounding is very important in bringing up.
| Your task achievement score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
It is important for children to learn the differences between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extend to you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Anwser:
It is crucial for juveniles to understand the differences between right and wrong when they are very young. Punishing is an important way to help them find out more about the distinctions. I completely agree with this statement and believe that some punishments are necessary during upbringing.
It is imperative to differentiate bad and good traits for children when they are still very young because the early stages of life are the era during which one’s personality forms and it is the best age to familiarize the young generation with humans’ intrinsic values and morals. Furthermore, when the child is very young he or she is more likely to pick up good and bad behaviors from others and follow them. In this case, mothers and fathers should try and explain moral principles in an easy and convincing way and if the child does not accept his or her impolite behaviour, parents have to take more serious actions such as grounding the child to teach him or her a lesson. I believe that imposing moderate punishments definitely plays an important role in raising children.
Although corporal punishments are not recommended, parents and teachers should be allowed to use other methods such as grounding them or giving them time outs because extolling them when they do something right in order to promote that trait is not always useful and can spoil them over time. On the other hand, punishing does not always have to be cruel. For instance, it is amazing how using inspiring stories and poems that are based on promoting ethics can be helpful in instilling good values in children and informing them indirectly that they have misbehaved.
In conclusion, I agree that teaching the young manners and good deeds as well as including more strictness such as grounding is very important in bringing up.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages.
Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Peer pressure refers to the influence young people experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviours. In my opinion, cohorts do have more positive impact than negative on adolescents and young adults.
On one hand, peer pressure often leads the young to engage in risky behaviours. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.
On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire adolescents to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young adults to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active cohorts and engaging in activities aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.
In conclusion, although peers can encourage risky behaviours and hinder personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantages make this pressure a positive phenomenon on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages.
Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Peer pressure refers to the influence young people experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviours. In my opinion, cohorts do have more positive impact than negative on adolescents and young adults.
On one hand, peer pressure often leads the young to engage in risky behaviours. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.
On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire adolescents to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young adults to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active cohorts and engaging in activities aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.
In conclusion, although peers can encourage risky behaviours and hinder personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantages make this pressure a positive phenomenon on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages.
Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Peer pressure refers to the influence young people experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviours. In my opinion, cohorts do have more positive impact than negative on adolescents and young adults.
On one hand, peer pressure often leads the young to engage in risky behaviours. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.
On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire adolescents to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young adults to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active cohorts and engaging in activities aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.
In conclusion, although peers can encourage risky behaviours and hinder personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantages make this pressure a positive phenomenon on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.
| Your lexical resource score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages.
Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Peer pressure refers to the influence young people experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviours. In my opinion, cohorts do have more positive impact than negative on adolescents and young adults.
On one hand, peer pressure often leads the young to engage in risky behaviours. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.
On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire adolescents to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young adults to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active cohorts and engaging in activities aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.
In conclusion, although peers can encourage risky behaviours and hinder personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantages make this pressure a positive phenomenon on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages.
Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Peer pressure refers to the influence young people experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviours. In my opinion, cohorts do have more positive impact than negative on adolescents and young adults.
On one hand, peer pressure often leads the young to engage in risky behaviours. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.
On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire adolescents to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young adults to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active cohorts and engaging in activities aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.
In conclusion, although peers can encourage risky behaviours and hinder personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantages make this pressure a positive phenomenon on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages.
Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Peer pressure refers to the influence young people experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviours. In my opinion, cohorts do have more positive impact than negative on adolescents and young adults.
On one hand, peer pressure often leads the young to engage in risky behaviours. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.
On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire adolescents to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young adults to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active cohorts and engaging in activities aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.
In conclusion, although peers can encourage risky behaviours and hinder personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantages make this pressure a positive phenomenon on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages.
Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Peer pressure refers to the influence young people experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviours. In my opinion, cohorts do have more positive impact than negative on adolescents and young adults.
On one hand, peer pressure often leads the young to engage in risky behaviours. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.
On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire adolescents to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young adults to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active cohorts and engaging in activities aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.
In conclusion, although peers can encourage risky behaviours and hinder personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantages make this pressure a positive phenomenon on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages.
Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?
Anwser:
Peer pressure refers to the influence young people experience within the same age group, affecting their behaviours. In my opinion, cohorts do have more positive impact than negative on adolescents and young adults.
On one hand, peer pressure often leads the young to engage in risky behaviours. For instance, teenagers may feel compelled to experiment with drugs due to the effect of their peers who engage in such activities. The desire to fit in and be accepted can override their better judgment, exposing them to serious short-term health risks and potential addiction later in life. Moreover, succumbing to negative peer pressure can adversely affect academic performance, as students may prioritize social acceptance over their studies. This desire for approval can result in poor grades, limited educational opportunities, and long-term negative consequences.
On the other hand, positive peer pressure can inspire adolescents to set higher goals, adopt healthier habits, and strive for academic excellence. Many teenagers are pressured by their peers to join a study group, leading to improved learning outcomes and academic success. Relatedly, supportive friends can inspire young adults to engage in physical fitness activities or pursue positive hobbies and talents, promoting a healthier and more well-rounded lifestyle. This sense of camaraderie and mutual encouragement fostered within positive groups can contribute significantly to personal growth and self-confidence. Actively seeking out positive and active cohorts and engaging in activities aligned with one’s personal values can help mitigate the adverse effects of negative peer pressure while harnessing the advantages of positive influence.
In conclusion, although peers can encourage risky behaviours and hinder personal growth, the motivational and emotional advantages make this pressure a positive phenomenon on the whole. Ultimately, striking some degree of balance between independence and positive peer interactions is crucial to minimizing the disadvantages and embracing the benefits.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries people have to pay for medical care, but some think that it should be a free service provided by the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
In most countries, individuals have to pay for medical treatment however, others believe that it must be free of charge from the government and provide their people with the best of health care. It is good to facilitate the people and consider their health as the first priority but doing so may also lead many governments to face financial crises. I will discuss all these in my essay below.
Firstly, many countries have a rule to pay for their health if they get ill. It is good if they are contributing to their health because some of the countries are not in good financial conditions so along with health they also have to look upon other sectors also like education, agriculture and many more. If they pay some amounts and reduce the burden benefits both citizens and the country. They will be safe from many other problems as well.
On the other hand, many argue that it is the responsibility of the government to provide them with the best healthcare services. Their point of view is also right because it is un unaffordable for many individuals to pay the full amount they even have money to eat. So, how it is possible for them to pay for the treatment? They are right but they do not know about the other's needs which their government is providing them like other necessities like gas, and water if they also start paying for this people become lazy and fully depend on the government for their work. Therefore, it is not a matter of a single sector it must be happening in a group or teamwork.
In conclusion, although it is good if the government is paying for health if people are paying for themselves it is not harmful. It is a combined effort from both the individuals and the ministry to improve the status of their country by providing them with the best of all. So, in my opinion, if people are paying it is of no harm.
| Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries people have to pay for medical care, but some think that it should be a free service provided by the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
In most countries, individuals have to pay for medical treatment however, others believe that it must be free of charge from the government and provide their people with the best of health care. It is good to facilitate the people and consider their health as the first priority but doing so may also lead many governments to face financial crises. I will discuss all these in my essay below.
Firstly, many countries have a rule to pay for their health if they get ill. It is good if they are contributing to their health because some of the countries are not in good financial conditions so along with health they also have to look upon other sectors also like education, agriculture and many more. If they pay some amounts and reduce the burden benefits both citizens and the country. They will be safe from many other problems as well.
On the other hand, many argue that it is the responsibility of the government to provide them with the best healthcare services. Their point of view is also right because it is un unaffordable for many individuals to pay the full amount they even have money to eat. So, how it is possible for them to pay for the treatment? They are right but they do not know about the other's needs which their government is providing them like other necessities like gas, and water if they also start paying for this people become lazy and fully depend on the government for their work. Therefore, it is not a matter of a single sector it must be happening in a group or teamwork.
In conclusion, although it is good if the government is paying for health if people are paying for themselves it is not harmful. It is a combined effort from both the individuals and the ministry to improve the status of their country by providing them with the best of all. So, in my opinion, if people are paying it is of no harm.
[/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries people have to pay for medical care, but some think that it should be a free service provided by the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
In most countries, individuals have to pay for medical treatment however, others believe that it must be free of charge from the government and provide their people with the best of health care. It is good to facilitate the people and consider their health as the first priority but doing so may also lead many governments to face financial crises. I will discuss all these in my essay below.
Firstly, many countries have a rule to pay for their health if they get ill. It is good if they are contributing to their health because some of the countries are not in good financial conditions so along with health they also have to look upon other sectors also like education, agriculture and many more. If they pay some amounts and reduce the burden benefits both citizens and the country. They will be safe from many other problems as well.
On the other hand, many argue that it is the responsibility of the government to provide them with the best healthcare services. Their point of view is also right because it is un unaffordable for many individuals to pay the full amount they even have money to eat. So, how it is possible for them to pay for the treatment? They are right but they do not know about the other's needs which their government is providing them like other necessities like gas, and water if they also start paying for this people become lazy and fully depend on the government for their work. Therefore, it is not a matter of a single sector it must be happening in a group or teamwork.
In conclusion, although it is good if the government is paying for health if people are paying for themselves it is not harmful. It is a combined effort from both the individuals and the ministry to improve the status of their country by providing them with the best of all. So, in my opinion, if people are paying it is of no harm.
| Your lexical resource score is 8.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries people have to pay for medical care, but some think that it should be a free service provided by the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
In most countries, individuals have to pay for medical treatment however, others believe that it must be free of charge from the government and provide their people with the best of health care. It is good to facilitate the people and consider their health as the first priority but doing so may also lead many governments to face financial crises. I will discuss all these in my essay below.
Firstly, many countries have a rule to pay for their health if they get ill. It is good if they are contributing to their health because some of the countries are not in good financial conditions so along with health they also have to look upon other sectors also like education, agriculture and many more. If they pay some amounts and reduce the burden benefits both citizens and the country. They will be safe from many other problems as well.
On the other hand, many argue that it is the responsibility of the government to provide them with the best healthcare services. Their point of view is also right because it is un unaffordable for many individuals to pay the full amount they even have money to eat. So, how it is possible for them to pay for the treatment? They are right but they do not know about the other's needs which their government is providing them like other necessities like gas, and water if they also start paying for this people become lazy and fully depend on the government for their work. Therefore, it is not a matter of a single sector it must be happening in a group or teamwork.
In conclusion, although it is good if the government is paying for health if people are paying for themselves it is not harmful. It is a combined effort from both the individuals and the ministry to improve the status of their country by providing them with the best of all. So, in my opinion, if people are paying it is of no harm.
[/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries people have to pay for medical care, but some think that it should be a free service provided by the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
In most countries, individuals have to pay for medical treatment however, others believe that it must be free of charge from the government and provide their people with the best of health care. It is good to facilitate the people and consider their health as the first priority but doing so may also lead many governments to face financial crises. I will discuss all these in my essay below.
Firstly, many countries have a rule to pay for their health if they get ill. It is good if they are contributing to their health because some of the countries are not in good financial conditions so along with health they also have to look upon other sectors also like education, agriculture and many more. If they pay some amounts and reduce the burden benefits both citizens and the country. They will be safe from many other problems as well.
On the other hand, many argue that it is the responsibility of the government to provide them with the best healthcare services. Their point of view is also right because it is un unaffordable for many individuals to pay the full amount they even have money to eat. So, how it is possible for them to pay for the treatment? They are right but they do not know about the other's needs which their government is providing them like other necessities like gas, and water if they also start paying for this people become lazy and fully depend on the government for their work. Therefore, it is not a matter of a single sector it must be happening in a group or teamwork.
In conclusion, although it is good if the government is paying for health if people are paying for themselves it is not harmful. It is a combined effort from both the individuals and the ministry to improve the status of their country by providing them with the best of all. So, in my opinion, if people are paying it is of no harm.
| Your grammatical range score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries people have to pay for medical care, but some think that it should be a free service provided by the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
In most countries, individuals have to pay for medical treatment however, others believe that it must be free of charge from the government and provide their people with the best of health care. It is good to facilitate the people and consider their health as the first priority but doing so may also lead many governments to face financial crises. I will discuss all these in my essay below.
Firstly, many countries have a rule to pay for their health if they get ill. It is good if they are contributing to their health because some of the countries are not in good financial conditions so along with health they also have to look upon other sectors also like education, agriculture and many more. If they pay some amounts and reduce the burden benefits both citizens and the country. They will be safe from many other problems as well.
On the other hand, many argue that it is the responsibility of the government to provide them with the best healthcare services. Their point of view is also right because it is un unaffordable for many individuals to pay the full amount they even have money to eat. So, how it is possible for them to pay for the treatment? They are right but they do not know about the other's needs which their government is providing them like other necessities like gas, and water if they also start paying for this people become lazy and fully depend on the government for their work. Therefore, it is not a matter of a single sector it must be happening in a group or teamwork.
In conclusion, although it is good if the government is paying for health if people are paying for themselves it is not harmful. It is a combined effort from both the individuals and the ministry to improve the status of their country by providing them with the best of all. So, in my opinion, if people are paying it is of no harm.
[/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s> |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries people have to pay for medical care, but some think that it should be a free service provided by the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
In most countries, individuals have to pay for medical treatment however, others believe that it must be free of charge from the government and provide their people with the best of health care. It is good to facilitate the people and consider their health as the first priority but doing so may also lead many governments to face financial crises. I will discuss all these in my essay below.
Firstly, many countries have a rule to pay for their health if they get ill. It is good if they are contributing to their health because some of the countries are not in good financial conditions so along with health they also have to look upon other sectors also like education, agriculture and many more. If they pay some amounts and reduce the burden benefits both citizens and the country. They will be safe from many other problems as well.
On the other hand, many argue that it is the responsibility of the government to provide them with the best healthcare services. Their point of view is also right because it is un unaffordable for many individuals to pay the full amount they even have money to eat. So, how it is possible for them to pay for the treatment? They are right but they do not know about the other's needs which their government is providing them like other necessities like gas, and water if they also start paying for this people become lazy and fully depend on the government for their work. Therefore, it is not a matter of a single sector it must be happening in a group or teamwork.
In conclusion, although it is good if the government is paying for health if people are paying for themselves it is not harmful. It is a combined effort from both the individuals and the ministry to improve the status of their country by providing them with the best of all. So, in my opinion, if people are paying it is of no harm.
| Your task achievement score is 9.0 | <s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In many countries people have to pay for medical care, but some think that it should be a free service provided by the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
In most countries, individuals have to pay for medical treatment however, others believe that it must be free of charge from the government and provide their people with the best of health care. It is good to facilitate the people and consider their health as the first priority but doing so may also lead many governments to face financial crises. I will discuss all these in my essay below.
Firstly, many countries have a rule to pay for their health if they get ill. It is good if they are contributing to their health because some of the countries are not in good financial conditions so along with health they also have to look upon other sectors also like education, agriculture and many more. If they pay some amounts and reduce the burden benefits both citizens and the country. They will be safe from many other problems as well.
On the other hand, many argue that it is the responsibility of the government to provide them with the best healthcare services. Their point of view is also right because it is un unaffordable for many individuals to pay the full amount they even have money to eat. So, how it is possible for them to pay for the treatment? They are right but they do not know about the other's needs which their government is providing them like other necessities like gas, and water if they also start paying for this people become lazy and fully depend on the government for their work. Therefore, it is not a matter of a single sector it must be happening in a group or teamwork.
In conclusion, although it is good if the government is paying for health if people are paying for themselves it is not harmful. It is a combined effort from both the individuals and the ministry to improve the status of their country by providing them with the best of all. So, in my opinion, if people are paying it is of no harm.
[/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s> |