Datasets:

binhng

/

scoring_ielts_dataset_v2

like 0

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Nowadays, young generation focus on different activities like working as a volunteer in settings. A number of folk loves to give their short period to the public who required it such as giving lectures, building houses etc. I believe there are several particular reasons like providing aid to them and the following paragraphs will expatiate both stances with lucid examples. To commence with, the first and foremost reason of doing unpaid job is their symphatetic nature towards other. This means they have the soft skills who loves to perform the free activities to help others. For example: the population of developed nations always helps the developing countries to make houses to live under shelter in different weathers,especially in cold season. Apart from that, this is one of the best way to gain practice in their fields. To illustrate my point: in this competative world, it is next to impossible to get good job, thus, lots of individuals gain participation through volunteer jobs like community service worker etc. In my opinion, both youngters and poorer countries have benefits in this type of opportunities. The significant example of this is collecting a contact in their own fileds is not helpful for only society but for young people too as they are using their knowledge into practice. To exemplify: a fresher nurse who works without money is not only performing duties but also using theortical information into pratical which ultimately helps them to clarify their doubts. Moreover, if they want to take higher studies, this is good opportunity for them because they are in-touch with studies or work as well as they are learning everday from experienced people. To conclude, there is not doubt that hiring a candidates without money is efficient for the counties because they aid them in various scenario such as building homes for population who needs, beside, it is even more helpful for newcomers as they can gain experience and learn from these opportunities etc.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Nowadays, young generation focus on different activities like working as a volunteer in settings. A number of folk loves to give their short period to the public who required it such as giving lectures, building houses etc. I believe there are several particular reasons like providing aid to them and the following paragraphs will expatiate both stances with lucid examples. To commence with, the first and foremost reason of doing unpaid job is their symphatetic nature towards other. This means they have the soft skills who loves to perform the free activities to help others. For example: the population of developed nations always helps the developing countries to make houses to live under shelter in different weathers,especially in cold season. Apart from that, this is one of the best way to gain practice in their fields. To illustrate my point: in this competative world, it is next to impossible to get good job, thus, lots of individuals gain participation through volunteer jobs like community service worker etc. In my opinion, both youngters and poorer countries have benefits in this type of opportunities. The significant example of this is collecting a contact in their own fileds is not helpful for only society but for young people too as they are using their knowledge into practice. To exemplify: a fresher nurse who works without money is not only performing duties but also using theortical information into pratical which ultimately helps them to clarify their doubts. Moreover, if they want to take higher studies, this is good opportunity for them because they are in-touch with studies or work as well as they are learning everday from experienced people. To conclude, there is not doubt that hiring a candidates without money is efficient for the counties because they aid them in various scenario such as building homes for population who needs, beside, it is even more helpful for newcomers as they can gain experience and learn from these opportunities etc. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Nowadays, young generation focus on different activities like working as a volunteer in settings. A number of folk loves to give their short period to the public who required it such as giving lectures, building houses etc. I believe there are several particular reasons like providing aid to them and the following paragraphs will expatiate both stances with lucid examples. To commence with, the first and foremost reason of doing unpaid job is their symphatetic nature towards other. This means they have the soft skills who loves to perform the free activities to help others. For example: the population of developed nations always helps the developing countries to make houses to live under shelter in different weathers,especially in cold season. Apart from that, this is one of the best way to gain practice in their fields. To illustrate my point: in this competative world, it is next to impossible to get good job, thus, lots of individuals gain participation through volunteer jobs like community service worker etc. In my opinion, both youngters and poorer countries have benefits in this type of opportunities. The significant example of this is collecting a contact in their own fileds is not helpful for only society but for young people too as they are using their knowledge into practice. To exemplify: a fresher nurse who works without money is not only performing duties but also using theortical information into pratical which ultimately helps them to clarify their doubts. Moreover, if they want to take higher studies, this is good opportunity for them because they are in-touch with studies or work as well as they are learning everday from experienced people. To conclude, there is not doubt that hiring a candidates without money is efficient for the counties because they aid them in various scenario such as building homes for population who needs, beside, it is even more helpful for newcomers as they can gain experience and learn from these opportunities etc.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Nowadays, young generation focus on different activities like working as a volunteer in settings. A number of folk loves to give their short period to the public who required it such as giving lectures, building houses etc. I believe there are several particular reasons like providing aid to them and the following paragraphs will expatiate both stances with lucid examples. To commence with, the first and foremost reason of doing unpaid job is their symphatetic nature towards other. This means they have the soft skills who loves to perform the free activities to help others. For example: the population of developed nations always helps the developing countries to make houses to live under shelter in different weathers,especially in cold season. Apart from that, this is one of the best way to gain practice in their fields. To illustrate my point: in this competative world, it is next to impossible to get good job, thus, lots of individuals gain participation through volunteer jobs like community service worker etc. In my opinion, both youngters and poorer countries have benefits in this type of opportunities. The significant example of this is collecting a contact in their own fileds is not helpful for only society but for young people too as they are using their knowledge into practice. To exemplify: a fresher nurse who works without money is not only performing duties but also using theortical information into pratical which ultimately helps them to clarify their doubts. Moreover, if they want to take higher studies, this is good opportunity for them because they are in-touch with studies or work as well as they are learning everday from experienced people. To conclude, there is not doubt that hiring a candidates without money is efficient for the counties because they aid them in various scenario such as building homes for population who needs, beside, it is even more helpful for newcomers as they can gain experience and learn from these opportunities etc. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Nowadays, young generation focus on different activities like working as a volunteer in settings. A number of folk loves to give their short period to the public who required it such as giving lectures, building houses etc. I believe there are several particular reasons like providing aid to them and the following paragraphs will expatiate both stances with lucid examples. To commence with, the first and foremost reason of doing unpaid job is their symphatetic nature towards other. This means they have the soft skills who loves to perform the free activities to help others. For example: the population of developed nations always helps the developing countries to make houses to live under shelter in different weathers,especially in cold season. Apart from that, this is one of the best way to gain practice in their fields. To illustrate my point: in this competative world, it is next to impossible to get good job, thus, lots of individuals gain participation through volunteer jobs like community service worker etc. In my opinion, both youngters and poorer countries have benefits in this type of opportunities. The significant example of this is collecting a contact in their own fileds is not helpful for only society but for young people too as they are using their knowledge into practice. To exemplify: a fresher nurse who works without money is not only performing duties but also using theortical information into pratical which ultimately helps them to clarify their doubts. Moreover, if they want to take higher studies, this is good opportunity for them because they are in-touch with studies or work as well as they are learning everday from experienced people. To conclude, there is not doubt that hiring a candidates without money is efficient for the counties because they aid them in various scenario such as building homes for population who needs, beside, it is even more helpful for newcomers as they can gain experience and learn from these opportunities etc.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Nowadays, young generation focus on different activities like working as a volunteer in settings. A number of folk loves to give their short period to the public who required it such as giving lectures, building houses etc. I believe there are several particular reasons like providing aid to them and the following paragraphs will expatiate both stances with lucid examples. To commence with, the first and foremost reason of doing unpaid job is their symphatetic nature towards other. This means they have the soft skills who loves to perform the free activities to help others. For example: the population of developed nations always helps the developing countries to make houses to live under shelter in different weathers,especially in cold season. Apart from that, this is one of the best way to gain practice in their fields. To illustrate my point: in this competative world, it is next to impossible to get good job, thus, lots of individuals gain participation through volunteer jobs like community service worker etc. In my opinion, both youngters and poorer countries have benefits in this type of opportunities. The significant example of this is collecting a contact in their own fileds is not helpful for only society but for young people too as they are using their knowledge into practice. To exemplify: a fresher nurse who works without money is not only performing duties but also using theortical information into pratical which ultimately helps them to clarify their doubts. Moreover, if they want to take higher studies, this is good opportunity for them because they are in-touch with studies or work as well as they are learning everday from experienced people. To conclude, there is not doubt that hiring a candidates without money is efficient for the counties because they aid them in various scenario such as building homes for population who needs, beside, it is even more helpful for newcomers as they can gain experience and learn from these opportunities etc. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Nowadays, young generation focus on different activities like working as a volunteer in settings. A number of folk loves to give their short period to the public who required it such as giving lectures, building houses etc. I believe there are several particular reasons like providing aid to them and the following paragraphs will expatiate both stances with lucid examples. To commence with, the first and foremost reason of doing unpaid job is their symphatetic nature towards other. This means they have the soft skills who loves to perform the free activities to help others. For example: the population of developed nations always helps the developing countries to make houses to live under shelter in different weathers,especially in cold season. Apart from that, this is one of the best way to gain practice in their fields. To illustrate my point: in this competative world, it is next to impossible to get good job, thus, lots of individuals gain participation through volunteer jobs like community service worker etc. In my opinion, both youngters and poorer countries have benefits in this type of opportunities. The significant example of this is collecting a contact in their own fileds is not helpful for only society but for young people too as they are using their knowledge into practice. To exemplify: a fresher nurse who works without money is not only performing duties but also using theortical information into pratical which ultimately helps them to clarify their doubts. Moreover, if they want to take higher studies, this is good opportunity for them because they are in-touch with studies or work as well as they are learning everday from experienced people. To conclude, there is not doubt that hiring a candidates without money is efficient for the counties because they aid them in various scenario such as building homes for population who needs, beside, it is even more helpful for newcomers as they can gain experience and learn from these opportunities etc.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries. Why young people choose to do so? Who will benefit more: young people or the communities? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Anwser: Nowadays, young generation focus on different activities like working as a volunteer in settings. A number of folk loves to give their short period to the public who required it such as giving lectures, building houses etc. I believe there are several particular reasons like providing aid to them and the following paragraphs will expatiate both stances with lucid examples. To commence with, the first and foremost reason of doing unpaid job is their symphatetic nature towards other. This means they have the soft skills who loves to perform the free activities to help others. For example: the population of developed nations always helps the developing countries to make houses to live under shelter in different weathers,especially in cold season. Apart from that, this is one of the best way to gain practice in their fields. To illustrate my point: in this competative world, it is next to impossible to get good job, thus, lots of individuals gain participation through volunteer jobs like community service worker etc. In my opinion, both youngters and poorer countries have benefits in this type of opportunities. The significant example of this is collecting a contact in their own fileds is not helpful for only society but for young people too as they are using their knowledge into practice. To exemplify: a fresher nurse who works without money is not only performing duties but also using theortical information into pratical which ultimately helps them to clarify their doubts. Moreover, if they want to take higher studies, this is good opportunity for them because they are in-touch with studies or work as well as they are learning everday from experienced people. To conclude, there is not doubt that hiring a candidates without money is efficient for the counties because they aid them in various scenario such as building homes for population who needs, beside, it is even more helpful for newcomers as they can gain experience and learn from these opportunities etc. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: 17.Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, develop countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Wealthier nations are in great efforts to support poorer ones in solving famine by providing them with financial support. However, it is of the opinion that this type of help does not work, therefore, more effective alternatives are required. Personally, I am inclined to agree with this notion. On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial aid can provide immediate relief in times of crisis, like natural disasters and health emergencies. It can help save lives and mitigate suffering. For example, locking down during the COVID-19 pandemic has exhausted the global economy, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Thus, money received from rich nations can help citizens from poorer ones meet basic needs such as clothes, food, medicine and accommodation. Additionally, in some cases, monetary assistance can help poorer countries develop basic infrastructure, including building roads, hospitals and schools, contributing to long-term development. On the other hand, I believe that poorer nations should be provided with other effective types of support to address the complex issue of poverty. Firstly, it is essential to have a quality education which is considered a sustainable pathway to economic development. A quality education can equip individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge that can improve their lives and contribute to their communities. When children access education, they can break down the cycle of poverty by securing their job opportunities and making informed decisions about health and well-being. It is expected by the United Nations that the GDP of poor regions may increase by 70% if all children can access education. Secondly, rich nations can transfer modern technology to poorer ones as a form of support. It is true that the adoption of advanced machines in the farming sector can boost agricultural productivity. This in turn can help them not only secure domestic food safety but also promote exporting, leading to an increase in overall income. To illustrate, a statistical report from the World Bank revealed that thanks to modern technology applied in the agricultural sector, the crop yields of Southern Asia have increased by 6 times during the last 40 years, contributing to the significant reduction of poverty in this area. In conclusion, although financial aid can solve the problem of poverty to some extent, I firmly assert that providing poorer nations with quality education and modern technology is a more sustainable solution, helping these countries overcome impoverishment in the long term.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: 17.Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, develop countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Wealthier nations are in great efforts to support poorer ones in solving famine by providing them with financial support. However, it is of the opinion that this type of help does not work, therefore, more effective alternatives are required. Personally, I am inclined to agree with this notion. On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial aid can provide immediate relief in times of crisis, like natural disasters and health emergencies. It can help save lives and mitigate suffering. For example, locking down during the COVID-19 pandemic has exhausted the global economy, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Thus, money received from rich nations can help citizens from poorer ones meet basic needs such as clothes, food, medicine and accommodation. Additionally, in some cases, monetary assistance can help poorer countries develop basic infrastructure, including building roads, hospitals and schools, contributing to long-term development. On the other hand, I believe that poorer nations should be provided with other effective types of support to address the complex issue of poverty. Firstly, it is essential to have a quality education which is considered a sustainable pathway to economic development. A quality education can equip individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge that can improve their lives and contribute to their communities. When children access education, they can break down the cycle of poverty by securing their job opportunities and making informed decisions about health and well-being. It is expected by the United Nations that the GDP of poor regions may increase by 70% if all children can access education. Secondly, rich nations can transfer modern technology to poorer ones as a form of support. It is true that the adoption of advanced machines in the farming sector can boost agricultural productivity. This in turn can help them not only secure domestic food safety but also promote exporting, leading to an increase in overall income. To illustrate, a statistical report from the World Bank revealed that thanks to modern technology applied in the agricultural sector, the crop yields of Southern Asia have increased by 6 times during the last 40 years, contributing to the significant reduction of poverty in this area. In conclusion, although financial aid can solve the problem of poverty to some extent, I firmly assert that providing poorer nations with quality education and modern technology is a more sustainable solution, helping these countries overcome impoverishment in the long term. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: 17.Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, develop countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Wealthier nations are in great efforts to support poorer ones in solving famine by providing them with financial support. However, it is of the opinion that this type of help does not work, therefore, more effective alternatives are required. Personally, I am inclined to agree with this notion. On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial aid can provide immediate relief in times of crisis, like natural disasters and health emergencies. It can help save lives and mitigate suffering. For example, locking down during the COVID-19 pandemic has exhausted the global economy, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Thus, money received from rich nations can help citizens from poorer ones meet basic needs such as clothes, food, medicine and accommodation. Additionally, in some cases, monetary assistance can help poorer countries develop basic infrastructure, including building roads, hospitals and schools, contributing to long-term development. On the other hand, I believe that poorer nations should be provided with other effective types of support to address the complex issue of poverty. Firstly, it is essential to have a quality education which is considered a sustainable pathway to economic development. A quality education can equip individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge that can improve their lives and contribute to their communities. When children access education, they can break down the cycle of poverty by securing their job opportunities and making informed decisions about health and well-being. It is expected by the United Nations that the GDP of poor regions may increase by 70% if all children can access education. Secondly, rich nations can transfer modern technology to poorer ones as a form of support. It is true that the adoption of advanced machines in the farming sector can boost agricultural productivity. This in turn can help them not only secure domestic food safety but also promote exporting, leading to an increase in overall income. To illustrate, a statistical report from the World Bank revealed that thanks to modern technology applied in the agricultural sector, the crop yields of Southern Asia have increased by 6 times during the last 40 years, contributing to the significant reduction of poverty in this area. In conclusion, although financial aid can solve the problem of poverty to some extent, I firmly assert that providing poorer nations with quality education and modern technology is a more sustainable solution, helping these countries overcome impoverishment in the long term.

Your lexical resource score is 6.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: 17.Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, develop countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Wealthier nations are in great efforts to support poorer ones in solving famine by providing them with financial support. However, it is of the opinion that this type of help does not work, therefore, more effective alternatives are required. Personally, I am inclined to agree with this notion. On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial aid can provide immediate relief in times of crisis, like natural disasters and health emergencies. It can help save lives and mitigate suffering. For example, locking down during the COVID-19 pandemic has exhausted the global economy, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Thus, money received from rich nations can help citizens from poorer ones meet basic needs such as clothes, food, medicine and accommodation. Additionally, in some cases, monetary assistance can help poorer countries develop basic infrastructure, including building roads, hospitals and schools, contributing to long-term development. On the other hand, I believe that poorer nations should be provided with other effective types of support to address the complex issue of poverty. Firstly, it is essential to have a quality education which is considered a sustainable pathway to economic development. A quality education can equip individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge that can improve their lives and contribute to their communities. When children access education, they can break down the cycle of poverty by securing their job opportunities and making informed decisions about health and well-being. It is expected by the United Nations that the GDP of poor regions may increase by 70% if all children can access education. Secondly, rich nations can transfer modern technology to poorer ones as a form of support. It is true that the adoption of advanced machines in the farming sector can boost agricultural productivity. This in turn can help them not only secure domestic food safety but also promote exporting, leading to an increase in overall income. To illustrate, a statistical report from the World Bank revealed that thanks to modern technology applied in the agricultural sector, the crop yields of Southern Asia have increased by 6 times during the last 40 years, contributing to the significant reduction of poverty in this area. In conclusion, although financial aid can solve the problem of poverty to some extent, I firmly assert that providing poorer nations with quality education and modern technology is a more sustainable solution, helping these countries overcome impoverishment in the long term. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 6.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: 17.Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, develop countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Wealthier nations are in great efforts to support poorer ones in solving famine by providing them with financial support. However, it is of the opinion that this type of help does not work, therefore, more effective alternatives are required. Personally, I am inclined to agree with this notion. On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial aid can provide immediate relief in times of crisis, like natural disasters and health emergencies. It can help save lives and mitigate suffering. For example, locking down during the COVID-19 pandemic has exhausted the global economy, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Thus, money received from rich nations can help citizens from poorer ones meet basic needs such as clothes, food, medicine and accommodation. Additionally, in some cases, monetary assistance can help poorer countries develop basic infrastructure, including building roads, hospitals and schools, contributing to long-term development. On the other hand, I believe that poorer nations should be provided with other effective types of support to address the complex issue of poverty. Firstly, it is essential to have a quality education which is considered a sustainable pathway to economic development. A quality education can equip individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge that can improve their lives and contribute to their communities. When children access education, they can break down the cycle of poverty by securing their job opportunities and making informed decisions about health and well-being. It is expected by the United Nations that the GDP of poor regions may increase by 70% if all children can access education. Secondly, rich nations can transfer modern technology to poorer ones as a form of support. It is true that the adoption of advanced machines in the farming sector can boost agricultural productivity. This in turn can help them not only secure domestic food safety but also promote exporting, leading to an increase in overall income. To illustrate, a statistical report from the World Bank revealed that thanks to modern technology applied in the agricultural sector, the crop yields of Southern Asia have increased by 6 times during the last 40 years, contributing to the significant reduction of poverty in this area. In conclusion, although financial aid can solve the problem of poverty to some extent, I firmly assert that providing poorer nations with quality education and modern technology is a more sustainable solution, helping these countries overcome impoverishment in the long term.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: 17.Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, develop countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Wealthier nations are in great efforts to support poorer ones in solving famine by providing them with financial support. However, it is of the opinion that this type of help does not work, therefore, more effective alternatives are required. Personally, I am inclined to agree with this notion. On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial aid can provide immediate relief in times of crisis, like natural disasters and health emergencies. It can help save lives and mitigate suffering. For example, locking down during the COVID-19 pandemic has exhausted the global economy, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Thus, money received from rich nations can help citizens from poorer ones meet basic needs such as clothes, food, medicine and accommodation. Additionally, in some cases, monetary assistance can help poorer countries develop basic infrastructure, including building roads, hospitals and schools, contributing to long-term development. On the other hand, I believe that poorer nations should be provided with other effective types of support to address the complex issue of poverty. Firstly, it is essential to have a quality education which is considered a sustainable pathway to economic development. A quality education can equip individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge that can improve their lives and contribute to their communities. When children access education, they can break down the cycle of poverty by securing their job opportunities and making informed decisions about health and well-being. It is expected by the United Nations that the GDP of poor regions may increase by 70% if all children can access education. Secondly, rich nations can transfer modern technology to poorer ones as a form of support. It is true that the adoption of advanced machines in the farming sector can boost agricultural productivity. This in turn can help them not only secure domestic food safety but also promote exporting, leading to an increase in overall income. To illustrate, a statistical report from the World Bank revealed that thanks to modern technology applied in the agricultural sector, the crop yields of Southern Asia have increased by 6 times during the last 40 years, contributing to the significant reduction of poverty in this area. In conclusion, although financial aid can solve the problem of poverty to some extent, I firmly assert that providing poorer nations with quality education and modern technology is a more sustainable solution, helping these countries overcome impoverishment in the long term. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: 17.Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, develop countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Wealthier nations are in great efforts to support poorer ones in solving famine by providing them with financial support. However, it is of the opinion that this type of help does not work, therefore, more effective alternatives are required. Personally, I am inclined to agree with this notion. On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial aid can provide immediate relief in times of crisis, like natural disasters and health emergencies. It can help save lives and mitigate suffering. For example, locking down during the COVID-19 pandemic has exhausted the global economy, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Thus, money received from rich nations can help citizens from poorer ones meet basic needs such as clothes, food, medicine and accommodation. Additionally, in some cases, monetary assistance can help poorer countries develop basic infrastructure, including building roads, hospitals and schools, contributing to long-term development. On the other hand, I believe that poorer nations should be provided with other effective types of support to address the complex issue of poverty. Firstly, it is essential to have a quality education which is considered a sustainable pathway to economic development. A quality education can equip individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge that can improve their lives and contribute to their communities. When children access education, they can break down the cycle of poverty by securing their job opportunities and making informed decisions about health and well-being. It is expected by the United Nations that the GDP of poor regions may increase by 70% if all children can access education. Secondly, rich nations can transfer modern technology to poorer ones as a form of support. It is true that the adoption of advanced machines in the farming sector can boost agricultural productivity. This in turn can help them not only secure domestic food safety but also promote exporting, leading to an increase in overall income. To illustrate, a statistical report from the World Bank revealed that thanks to modern technology applied in the agricultural sector, the crop yields of Southern Asia have increased by 6 times during the last 40 years, contributing to the significant reduction of poverty in this area. In conclusion, although financial aid can solve the problem of poverty to some extent, I firmly assert that providing poorer nations with quality education and modern technology is a more sustainable solution, helping these countries overcome impoverishment in the long term.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: 17.Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, develop countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Wealthier nations are in great efforts to support poorer ones in solving famine by providing them with financial support. However, it is of the opinion that this type of help does not work, therefore, more effective alternatives are required. Personally, I am inclined to agree with this notion. On the one hand, it is undeniable that financial aid can provide immediate relief in times of crisis, like natural disasters and health emergencies. It can help save lives and mitigate suffering. For example, locking down during the COVID-19 pandemic has exhausted the global economy, especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Thus, money received from rich nations can help citizens from poorer ones meet basic needs such as clothes, food, medicine and accommodation. Additionally, in some cases, monetary assistance can help poorer countries develop basic infrastructure, including building roads, hospitals and schools, contributing to long-term development. On the other hand, I believe that poorer nations should be provided with other effective types of support to address the complex issue of poverty. Firstly, it is essential to have a quality education which is considered a sustainable pathway to economic development. A quality education can equip individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge that can improve their lives and contribute to their communities. When children access education, they can break down the cycle of poverty by securing their job opportunities and making informed decisions about health and well-being. It is expected by the United Nations that the GDP of poor regions may increase by 70% if all children can access education. Secondly, rich nations can transfer modern technology to poorer ones as a form of support. It is true that the adoption of advanced machines in the farming sector can boost agricultural productivity. This in turn can help them not only secure domestic food safety but also promote exporting, leading to an increase in overall income. To illustrate, a statistical report from the World Bank revealed that thanks to modern technology applied in the agricultural sector, the crop yields of Southern Asia have increased by 6 times during the last 40 years, contributing to the significant reduction of poverty in this area. In conclusion, although financial aid can solve the problem of poverty to some extent, I firmly assert that providing poorer nations with quality education and modern technology is a more sustainable solution, helping these countries overcome impoverishment in the long term. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: many people think that technology creates significant impact in the modern word? Do you agree with this statement? Anwser: There has been an argument about whether technology has had a huge impact on humans' contemporary lives or not. I believe everybody would agree that we are living in a technologically advanced world where every nation is spending a lot on cutting-edge innovations and therefore, it is safe to say that these advances have now become an important part of our lives. Moreover, with the advent of computers, it did not take computer scientists a long time to create the Internet which almost everybody has access to nowadays. Furthermore, we were introduced to artificial intelligence which has revolutionized our lives. Firstly, the internet has been remembered as one of the greatest inventions of our time alongside electricity and automobiles. It was not long after the first commercial personal computers were introduced that connecting multiple computers in the shape of a network went under extensive research in the greatest labs across the world. Soon after the network changed every aspect of our lives whether it was banking transactions, transportation, research or entertainment. For instance, my grandmother has joint pain and she cannot do her grocery shopping herself but today, she just uses an app called Snapp to buy whatever she wants and has them delivered to her doors. Thus, the internet is a great example of how our lives now depend on state-of-the-art technology. Secondly, one of the most exciting advances of recent times is artificial intelligence. It was no one but the first computer scientist, Allan Turing, who started the idea of intelligent computers. Since then, although a lot of sci-fi movies suggested that we are going to be wiped out by the hands of the mighty robots, they have been helping humanity a lot. It has been incorporated into almost every computer-based service we use whether it is online or even offline, such as our best search engines and the recommender systems in our most favourite e-commerce websites. For example, thanks to the navigation applications that we have available on our phones, we cannot get lost in the megapolises we live in. Hence, our massive use of machine learning algorithms leaves us with no doubt that artificial intelligence has changed the entirety of our lives. To conclude, it is not an easy task to write about the importance of recent technologies because there are so many of them. But, as I mentioned earlier, the internet and following that machine learning are now at the core end of every task we do on a daily basis and so, these technologies are great examples to implicate the role of innovations in our lives.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: many people think that technology creates significant impact in the modern word? Do you agree with this statement? Anwser: There has been an argument about whether technology has had a huge impact on humans' contemporary lives or not. I believe everybody would agree that we are living in a technologically advanced world where every nation is spending a lot on cutting-edge innovations and therefore, it is safe to say that these advances have now become an important part of our lives. Moreover, with the advent of computers, it did not take computer scientists a long time to create the Internet which almost everybody has access to nowadays. Furthermore, we were introduced to artificial intelligence which has revolutionized our lives. Firstly, the internet has been remembered as one of the greatest inventions of our time alongside electricity and automobiles. It was not long after the first commercial personal computers were introduced that connecting multiple computers in the shape of a network went under extensive research in the greatest labs across the world. Soon after the network changed every aspect of our lives whether it was banking transactions, transportation, research or entertainment. For instance, my grandmother has joint pain and she cannot do her grocery shopping herself but today, she just uses an app called Snapp to buy whatever she wants and has them delivered to her doors. Thus, the internet is a great example of how our lives now depend on state-of-the-art technology. Secondly, one of the most exciting advances of recent times is artificial intelligence. It was no one but the first computer scientist, Allan Turing, who started the idea of intelligent computers. Since then, although a lot of sci-fi movies suggested that we are going to be wiped out by the hands of the mighty robots, they have been helping humanity a lot. It has been incorporated into almost every computer-based service we use whether it is online or even offline, such as our best search engines and the recommender systems in our most favourite e-commerce websites. For example, thanks to the navigation applications that we have available on our phones, we cannot get lost in the megapolises we live in. Hence, our massive use of machine learning algorithms leaves us with no doubt that artificial intelligence has changed the entirety of our lives. To conclude, it is not an easy task to write about the importance of recent technologies because there are so many of them. But, as I mentioned earlier, the internet and following that machine learning are now at the core end of every task we do on a daily basis and so, these technologies are great examples to implicate the role of innovations in our lives. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: many people think that technology creates significant impact in the modern word? Do you agree with this statement? Anwser: There has been an argument about whether technology has had a huge impact on humans' contemporary lives or not. I believe everybody would agree that we are living in a technologically advanced world where every nation is spending a lot on cutting-edge innovations and therefore, it is safe to say that these advances have now become an important part of our lives. Moreover, with the advent of computers, it did not take computer scientists a long time to create the Internet which almost everybody has access to nowadays. Furthermore, we were introduced to artificial intelligence which has revolutionized our lives. Firstly, the internet has been remembered as one of the greatest inventions of our time alongside electricity and automobiles. It was not long after the first commercial personal computers were introduced that connecting multiple computers in the shape of a network went under extensive research in the greatest labs across the world. Soon after the network changed every aspect of our lives whether it was banking transactions, transportation, research or entertainment. For instance, my grandmother has joint pain and she cannot do her grocery shopping herself but today, she just uses an app called Snapp to buy whatever she wants and has them delivered to her doors. Thus, the internet is a great example of how our lives now depend on state-of-the-art technology. Secondly, one of the most exciting advances of recent times is artificial intelligence. It was no one but the first computer scientist, Allan Turing, who started the idea of intelligent computers. Since then, although a lot of sci-fi movies suggested that we are going to be wiped out by the hands of the mighty robots, they have been helping humanity a lot. It has been incorporated into almost every computer-based service we use whether it is online or even offline, such as our best search engines and the recommender systems in our most favourite e-commerce websites. For example, thanks to the navigation applications that we have available on our phones, we cannot get lost in the megapolises we live in. Hence, our massive use of machine learning algorithms leaves us with no doubt that artificial intelligence has changed the entirety of our lives. To conclude, it is not an easy task to write about the importance of recent technologies because there are so many of them. But, as I mentioned earlier, the internet and following that machine learning are now at the core end of every task we do on a daily basis and so, these technologies are great examples to implicate the role of innovations in our lives.

Your lexical resource score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: many people think that technology creates significant impact in the modern word? Do you agree with this statement? Anwser: There has been an argument about whether technology has had a huge impact on humans' contemporary lives or not. I believe everybody would agree that we are living in a technologically advanced world where every nation is spending a lot on cutting-edge innovations and therefore, it is safe to say that these advances have now become an important part of our lives. Moreover, with the advent of computers, it did not take computer scientists a long time to create the Internet which almost everybody has access to nowadays. Furthermore, we were introduced to artificial intelligence which has revolutionized our lives. Firstly, the internet has been remembered as one of the greatest inventions of our time alongside electricity and automobiles. It was not long after the first commercial personal computers were introduced that connecting multiple computers in the shape of a network went under extensive research in the greatest labs across the world. Soon after the network changed every aspect of our lives whether it was banking transactions, transportation, research or entertainment. For instance, my grandmother has joint pain and she cannot do her grocery shopping herself but today, she just uses an app called Snapp to buy whatever she wants and has them delivered to her doors. Thus, the internet is a great example of how our lives now depend on state-of-the-art technology. Secondly, one of the most exciting advances of recent times is artificial intelligence. It was no one but the first computer scientist, Allan Turing, who started the idea of intelligent computers. Since then, although a lot of sci-fi movies suggested that we are going to be wiped out by the hands of the mighty robots, they have been helping humanity a lot. It has been incorporated into almost every computer-based service we use whether it is online or even offline, such as our best search engines and the recommender systems in our most favourite e-commerce websites. For example, thanks to the navigation applications that we have available on our phones, we cannot get lost in the megapolises we live in. Hence, our massive use of machine learning algorithms leaves us with no doubt that artificial intelligence has changed the entirety of our lives. To conclude, it is not an easy task to write about the importance of recent technologies because there are so many of them. But, as I mentioned earlier, the internet and following that machine learning are now at the core end of every task we do on a daily basis and so, these technologies are great examples to implicate the role of innovations in our lives. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: many people think that technology creates significant impact in the modern word? Do you agree with this statement? Anwser: There has been an argument about whether technology has had a huge impact on humans' contemporary lives or not. I believe everybody would agree that we are living in a technologically advanced world where every nation is spending a lot on cutting-edge innovations and therefore, it is safe to say that these advances have now become an important part of our lives. Moreover, with the advent of computers, it did not take computer scientists a long time to create the Internet which almost everybody has access to nowadays. Furthermore, we were introduced to artificial intelligence which has revolutionized our lives. Firstly, the internet has been remembered as one of the greatest inventions of our time alongside electricity and automobiles. It was not long after the first commercial personal computers were introduced that connecting multiple computers in the shape of a network went under extensive research in the greatest labs across the world. Soon after the network changed every aspect of our lives whether it was banking transactions, transportation, research or entertainment. For instance, my grandmother has joint pain and she cannot do her grocery shopping herself but today, she just uses an app called Snapp to buy whatever she wants and has them delivered to her doors. Thus, the internet is a great example of how our lives now depend on state-of-the-art technology. Secondly, one of the most exciting advances of recent times is artificial intelligence. It was no one but the first computer scientist, Allan Turing, who started the idea of intelligent computers. Since then, although a lot of sci-fi movies suggested that we are going to be wiped out by the hands of the mighty robots, they have been helping humanity a lot. It has been incorporated into almost every computer-based service we use whether it is online or even offline, such as our best search engines and the recommender systems in our most favourite e-commerce websites. For example, thanks to the navigation applications that we have available on our phones, we cannot get lost in the megapolises we live in. Hence, our massive use of machine learning algorithms leaves us with no doubt that artificial intelligence has changed the entirety of our lives. To conclude, it is not an easy task to write about the importance of recent technologies because there are so many of them. But, as I mentioned earlier, the internet and following that machine learning are now at the core end of every task we do on a daily basis and so, these technologies are great examples to implicate the role of innovations in our lives.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: many people think that technology creates significant impact in the modern word? Do you agree with this statement? Anwser: There has been an argument about whether technology has had a huge impact on humans' contemporary lives or not. I believe everybody would agree that we are living in a technologically advanced world where every nation is spending a lot on cutting-edge innovations and therefore, it is safe to say that these advances have now become an important part of our lives. Moreover, with the advent of computers, it did not take computer scientists a long time to create the Internet which almost everybody has access to nowadays. Furthermore, we were introduced to artificial intelligence which has revolutionized our lives. Firstly, the internet has been remembered as one of the greatest inventions of our time alongside electricity and automobiles. It was not long after the first commercial personal computers were introduced that connecting multiple computers in the shape of a network went under extensive research in the greatest labs across the world. Soon after the network changed every aspect of our lives whether it was banking transactions, transportation, research or entertainment. For instance, my grandmother has joint pain and she cannot do her grocery shopping herself but today, she just uses an app called Snapp to buy whatever she wants and has them delivered to her doors. Thus, the internet is a great example of how our lives now depend on state-of-the-art technology. Secondly, one of the most exciting advances of recent times is artificial intelligence. It was no one but the first computer scientist, Allan Turing, who started the idea of intelligent computers. Since then, although a lot of sci-fi movies suggested that we are going to be wiped out by the hands of the mighty robots, they have been helping humanity a lot. It has been incorporated into almost every computer-based service we use whether it is online or even offline, such as our best search engines and the recommender systems in our most favourite e-commerce websites. For example, thanks to the navigation applications that we have available on our phones, we cannot get lost in the megapolises we live in. Hence, our massive use of machine learning algorithms leaves us with no doubt that artificial intelligence has changed the entirety of our lives. To conclude, it is not an easy task to write about the importance of recent technologies because there are so many of them. But, as I mentioned earlier, the internet and following that machine learning are now at the core end of every task we do on a daily basis and so, these technologies are great examples to implicate the role of innovations in our lives. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: many people think that technology creates significant impact in the modern word? Do you agree with this statement? Anwser: There has been an argument about whether technology has had a huge impact on humans' contemporary lives or not. I believe everybody would agree that we are living in a technologically advanced world where every nation is spending a lot on cutting-edge innovations and therefore, it is safe to say that these advances have now become an important part of our lives. Moreover, with the advent of computers, it did not take computer scientists a long time to create the Internet which almost everybody has access to nowadays. Furthermore, we were introduced to artificial intelligence which has revolutionized our lives. Firstly, the internet has been remembered as one of the greatest inventions of our time alongside electricity and automobiles. It was not long after the first commercial personal computers were introduced that connecting multiple computers in the shape of a network went under extensive research in the greatest labs across the world. Soon after the network changed every aspect of our lives whether it was banking transactions, transportation, research or entertainment. For instance, my grandmother has joint pain and she cannot do her grocery shopping herself but today, she just uses an app called Snapp to buy whatever she wants and has them delivered to her doors. Thus, the internet is a great example of how our lives now depend on state-of-the-art technology. Secondly, one of the most exciting advances of recent times is artificial intelligence. It was no one but the first computer scientist, Allan Turing, who started the idea of intelligent computers. Since then, although a lot of sci-fi movies suggested that we are going to be wiped out by the hands of the mighty robots, they have been helping humanity a lot. It has been incorporated into almost every computer-based service we use whether it is online or even offline, such as our best search engines and the recommender systems in our most favourite e-commerce websites. For example, thanks to the navigation applications that we have available on our phones, we cannot get lost in the megapolises we live in. Hence, our massive use of machine learning algorithms leaves us with no doubt that artificial intelligence has changed the entirety of our lives. To conclude, it is not an easy task to write about the importance of recent technologies because there are so many of them. But, as I mentioned earlier, the internet and following that machine learning are now at the core end of every task we do on a daily basis and so, these technologies are great examples to implicate the role of innovations in our lives.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: many people think that technology creates significant impact in the modern word? Do you agree with this statement? Anwser: There has been an argument about whether technology has had a huge impact on humans' contemporary lives or not. I believe everybody would agree that we are living in a technologically advanced world where every nation is spending a lot on cutting-edge innovations and therefore, it is safe to say that these advances have now become an important part of our lives. Moreover, with the advent of computers, it did not take computer scientists a long time to create the Internet which almost everybody has access to nowadays. Furthermore, we were introduced to artificial intelligence which has revolutionized our lives. Firstly, the internet has been remembered as one of the greatest inventions of our time alongside electricity and automobiles. It was not long after the first commercial personal computers were introduced that connecting multiple computers in the shape of a network went under extensive research in the greatest labs across the world. Soon after the network changed every aspect of our lives whether it was banking transactions, transportation, research or entertainment. For instance, my grandmother has joint pain and she cannot do her grocery shopping herself but today, she just uses an app called Snapp to buy whatever she wants and has them delivered to her doors. Thus, the internet is a great example of how our lives now depend on state-of-the-art technology. Secondly, one of the most exciting advances of recent times is artificial intelligence. It was no one but the first computer scientist, Allan Turing, who started the idea of intelligent computers. Since then, although a lot of sci-fi movies suggested that we are going to be wiped out by the hands of the mighty robots, they have been helping humanity a lot. It has been incorporated into almost every computer-based service we use whether it is online or even offline, such as our best search engines and the recommender systems in our most favourite e-commerce websites. For example, thanks to the navigation applications that we have available on our phones, we cannot get lost in the megapolises we live in. Hence, our massive use of machine learning algorithms leaves us with no doubt that artificial intelligence has changed the entirety of our lives. To conclude, it is not an easy task to write about the importance of recent technologies because there are so many of them. But, as I mentioned earlier, the internet and following that machine learning are now at the core end of every task we do on a daily basis and so, these technologies are great examples to implicate the role of innovations in our lives. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that technological development has made life complex. The only possible solution it not to use technology to live a simpler life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern era, mechanism plays a crucial role in our daily schedule. Some argue that advancements in machinery have made life more complicated, suggesting that the only way to simplify lifestyle is to completely avoid using technology. Although automation can make life more complex in some ways, it has also simplified many aspects of our lives. This essay will explore my perspective on this issue before reaching a final conclusion. To begin with, technological progress has unquestionably added complexity to our growth, especially in terms of increased connectivity. Specifically, the constant use of smartphones and social media has led many people to become glued to their screens, resulting in problems like sleep disturbances and reduced face-to-face interactions. This situation is further highlighted by the rise of "tech addiction," where individuals struggle to detach from their devices. For example, a study conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health in Bangalore, India, discovered that excessive smartphone usage was linked to higher levels of stress, anxiety, and sleep problems among teenagers. Therefore, excessive use of technology has led to various complex health issues. However, technological assets have also brought significant simplifications to our growth, particularly in fields like healthcare and banking. In other words, the availability of medical information online has empowered individuals to take control of their health, making medical advice more accessible and convenient. Additionally, the introduction of online banking services in India has streamlined financial transactions, eliminating the need for long waits at physical banks. In these ways, the mechanism has played a vital role in making essential aspects of the human lifestyle less complicated. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, I concur that technological development has introduced complexity into our lives; nevertheless, it has also provided solutions to simplify various aspects of our existence. Therefore, technology should be used for its benefits while remaining mindful of its excessive use which leads to several problems.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that technological development has made life complex. The only possible solution it not to use technology to live a simpler life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern era, mechanism plays a crucial role in our daily schedule. Some argue that advancements in machinery have made life more complicated, suggesting that the only way to simplify lifestyle is to completely avoid using technology. Although automation can make life more complex in some ways, it has also simplified many aspects of our lives. This essay will explore my perspective on this issue before reaching a final conclusion. To begin with, technological progress has unquestionably added complexity to our growth, especially in terms of increased connectivity. Specifically, the constant use of smartphones and social media has led many people to become glued to their screens, resulting in problems like sleep disturbances and reduced face-to-face interactions. This situation is further highlighted by the rise of "tech addiction," where individuals struggle to detach from their devices. For example, a study conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health in Bangalore, India, discovered that excessive smartphone usage was linked to higher levels of stress, anxiety, and sleep problems among teenagers. Therefore, excessive use of technology has led to various complex health issues. However, technological assets have also brought significant simplifications to our growth, particularly in fields like healthcare and banking. In other words, the availability of medical information online has empowered individuals to take control of their health, making medical advice more accessible and convenient. Additionally, the introduction of online banking services in India has streamlined financial transactions, eliminating the need for long waits at physical banks. In these ways, the mechanism has played a vital role in making essential aspects of the human lifestyle less complicated. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, I concur that technological development has introduced complexity into our lives; nevertheless, it has also provided solutions to simplify various aspects of our existence. Therefore, technology should be used for its benefits while remaining mindful of its excessive use which leads to several problems. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that technological development has made life complex. The only possible solution it not to use technology to live a simpler life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern era, mechanism plays a crucial role in our daily schedule. Some argue that advancements in machinery have made life more complicated, suggesting that the only way to simplify lifestyle is to completely avoid using technology. Although automation can make life more complex in some ways, it has also simplified many aspects of our lives. This essay will explore my perspective on this issue before reaching a final conclusion. To begin with, technological progress has unquestionably added complexity to our growth, especially in terms of increased connectivity. Specifically, the constant use of smartphones and social media has led many people to become glued to their screens, resulting in problems like sleep disturbances and reduced face-to-face interactions. This situation is further highlighted by the rise of "tech addiction," where individuals struggle to detach from their devices. For example, a study conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health in Bangalore, India, discovered that excessive smartphone usage was linked to higher levels of stress, anxiety, and sleep problems among teenagers. Therefore, excessive use of technology has led to various complex health issues. However, technological assets have also brought significant simplifications to our growth, particularly in fields like healthcare and banking. In other words, the availability of medical information online has empowered individuals to take control of their health, making medical advice more accessible and convenient. Additionally, the introduction of online banking services in India has streamlined financial transactions, eliminating the need for long waits at physical banks. In these ways, the mechanism has played a vital role in making essential aspects of the human lifestyle less complicated. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, I concur that technological development has introduced complexity into our lives; nevertheless, it has also provided solutions to simplify various aspects of our existence. Therefore, technology should be used for its benefits while remaining mindful of its excessive use which leads to several problems.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that technological development has made life complex. The only possible solution it not to use technology to live a simpler life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern era, mechanism plays a crucial role in our daily schedule. Some argue that advancements in machinery have made life more complicated, suggesting that the only way to simplify lifestyle is to completely avoid using technology. Although automation can make life more complex in some ways, it has also simplified many aspects of our lives. This essay will explore my perspective on this issue before reaching a final conclusion. To begin with, technological progress has unquestionably added complexity to our growth, especially in terms of increased connectivity. Specifically, the constant use of smartphones and social media has led many people to become glued to their screens, resulting in problems like sleep disturbances and reduced face-to-face interactions. This situation is further highlighted by the rise of "tech addiction," where individuals struggle to detach from their devices. For example, a study conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health in Bangalore, India, discovered that excessive smartphone usage was linked to higher levels of stress, anxiety, and sleep problems among teenagers. Therefore, excessive use of technology has led to various complex health issues. However, technological assets have also brought significant simplifications to our growth, particularly in fields like healthcare and banking. In other words, the availability of medical information online has empowered individuals to take control of their health, making medical advice more accessible and convenient. Additionally, the introduction of online banking services in India has streamlined financial transactions, eliminating the need for long waits at physical banks. In these ways, the mechanism has played a vital role in making essential aspects of the human lifestyle less complicated. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, I concur that technological development has introduced complexity into our lives; nevertheless, it has also provided solutions to simplify various aspects of our existence. Therefore, technology should be used for its benefits while remaining mindful of its excessive use which leads to several problems. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that technological development has made life complex. The only possible solution it not to use technology to live a simpler life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern era, mechanism plays a crucial role in our daily schedule. Some argue that advancements in machinery have made life more complicated, suggesting that the only way to simplify lifestyle is to completely avoid using technology. Although automation can make life more complex in some ways, it has also simplified many aspects of our lives. This essay will explore my perspective on this issue before reaching a final conclusion. To begin with, technological progress has unquestionably added complexity to our growth, especially in terms of increased connectivity. Specifically, the constant use of smartphones and social media has led many people to become glued to their screens, resulting in problems like sleep disturbances and reduced face-to-face interactions. This situation is further highlighted by the rise of "tech addiction," where individuals struggle to detach from their devices. For example, a study conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health in Bangalore, India, discovered that excessive smartphone usage was linked to higher levels of stress, anxiety, and sleep problems among teenagers. Therefore, excessive use of technology has led to various complex health issues. However, technological assets have also brought significant simplifications to our growth, particularly in fields like healthcare and banking. In other words, the availability of medical information online has empowered individuals to take control of their health, making medical advice more accessible and convenient. Additionally, the introduction of online banking services in India has streamlined financial transactions, eliminating the need for long waits at physical banks. In these ways, the mechanism has played a vital role in making essential aspects of the human lifestyle less complicated. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, I concur that technological development has introduced complexity into our lives; nevertheless, it has also provided solutions to simplify various aspects of our existence. Therefore, technology should be used for its benefits while remaining mindful of its excessive use which leads to several problems.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that technological development has made life complex. The only possible solution it not to use technology to live a simpler life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern era, mechanism plays a crucial role in our daily schedule. Some argue that advancements in machinery have made life more complicated, suggesting that the only way to simplify lifestyle is to completely avoid using technology. Although automation can make life more complex in some ways, it has also simplified many aspects of our lives. This essay will explore my perspective on this issue before reaching a final conclusion. To begin with, technological progress has unquestionably added complexity to our growth, especially in terms of increased connectivity. Specifically, the constant use of smartphones and social media has led many people to become glued to their screens, resulting in problems like sleep disturbances and reduced face-to-face interactions. This situation is further highlighted by the rise of "tech addiction," where individuals struggle to detach from their devices. For example, a study conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health in Bangalore, India, discovered that excessive smartphone usage was linked to higher levels of stress, anxiety, and sleep problems among teenagers. Therefore, excessive use of technology has led to various complex health issues. However, technological assets have also brought significant simplifications to our growth, particularly in fields like healthcare and banking. In other words, the availability of medical information online has empowered individuals to take control of their health, making medical advice more accessible and convenient. Additionally, the introduction of online banking services in India has streamlined financial transactions, eliminating the need for long waits at physical banks. In these ways, the mechanism has played a vital role in making essential aspects of the human lifestyle less complicated. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, I concur that technological development has introduced complexity into our lives; nevertheless, it has also provided solutions to simplify various aspects of our existence. Therefore, technology should be used for its benefits while remaining mindful of its excessive use which leads to several problems. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that technological development has made life complex. The only possible solution it not to use technology to live a simpler life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern era, mechanism plays a crucial role in our daily schedule. Some argue that advancements in machinery have made life more complicated, suggesting that the only way to simplify lifestyle is to completely avoid using technology. Although automation can make life more complex in some ways, it has also simplified many aspects of our lives. This essay will explore my perspective on this issue before reaching a final conclusion. To begin with, technological progress has unquestionably added complexity to our growth, especially in terms of increased connectivity. Specifically, the constant use of smartphones and social media has led many people to become glued to their screens, resulting in problems like sleep disturbances and reduced face-to-face interactions. This situation is further highlighted by the rise of "tech addiction," where individuals struggle to detach from their devices. For example, a study conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health in Bangalore, India, discovered that excessive smartphone usage was linked to higher levels of stress, anxiety, and sleep problems among teenagers. Therefore, excessive use of technology has led to various complex health issues. However, technological assets have also brought significant simplifications to our growth, particularly in fields like healthcare and banking. In other words, the availability of medical information online has empowered individuals to take control of their health, making medical advice more accessible and convenient. Additionally, the introduction of online banking services in India has streamlined financial transactions, eliminating the need for long waits at physical banks. In these ways, the mechanism has played a vital role in making essential aspects of the human lifestyle less complicated. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, I concur that technological development has introduced complexity into our lives; nevertheless, it has also provided solutions to simplify various aspects of our existence. Therefore, technology should be used for its benefits while remaining mindful of its excessive use which leads to several problems.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that technological development has made life complex. The only possible solution it not to use technology to live a simpler life. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In today's modern era, mechanism plays a crucial role in our daily schedule. Some argue that advancements in machinery have made life more complicated, suggesting that the only way to simplify lifestyle is to completely avoid using technology. Although automation can make life more complex in some ways, it has also simplified many aspects of our lives. This essay will explore my perspective on this issue before reaching a final conclusion. To begin with, technological progress has unquestionably added complexity to our growth, especially in terms of increased connectivity. Specifically, the constant use of smartphones and social media has led many people to become glued to their screens, resulting in problems like sleep disturbances and reduced face-to-face interactions. This situation is further highlighted by the rise of "tech addiction," where individuals struggle to detach from their devices. For example, a study conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health in Bangalore, India, discovered that excessive smartphone usage was linked to higher levels of stress, anxiety, and sleep problems among teenagers. Therefore, excessive use of technology has led to various complex health issues. However, technological assets have also brought significant simplifications to our growth, particularly in fields like healthcare and banking. In other words, the availability of medical information online has empowered individuals to take control of their health, making medical advice more accessible and convenient. Additionally, the introduction of online banking services in India has streamlined financial transactions, eliminating the need for long waits at physical banks. In these ways, the mechanism has played a vital role in making essential aspects of the human lifestyle less complicated. In conclusion, having discussed the topic at length, I concur that technological development has introduced complexity into our lives; nevertheless, it has also provided solutions to simplify various aspects of our existence. Therefore, technology should be used for its benefits while remaining mindful of its excessive use which leads to several problems. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic. The use of social media, e.g. Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words Anwser: Social media has now proven to be one of the biggest parts of our lives. Some regard it as an indispensable tool, while others feel concerned about its impact on our social lives. This essay will delve into the positive and negative sides of social applications, as well as provide examples and arguments on why I personally believe that the disadvantages overshadow the benefits of the indicated development. To begin with, websites like Twitter have proven to aid in connecting individuals all over the globe, enhancing their wealth of knowledge. In other words, with social networks, the public is more aware of the cultures and experiences that they otherwise would never be in the know of. For example, there has been a trend named #BlackLivesMatter, which sheds light on the discrimination that coloured people experience in Western countries. Without social media platforms, many would stay ignorant of the racism that runs rampant in these countries. On the contrary, social websites could also bring irreversible damage to a person's mental health. One of these occurrences is that the Web serves as a coping mechanism for many to use, which discourages them from enduring the hardships of life. To exemplify, Hikikomori is a Japanese term for the crowd who are Internet addicts, staying in their rooms to escape the outside world. Moreover, mass media is not safe. Simply speaking, they create breeding grounds for the community with nefarious intents. A small portion of these instances would be the many accounts of not only information stealing, but also grooming, paedophilia and cyberbullying. In conclusion, although the World Wide Web is a useful tool to help the public connect, I believe that its influence is predominantly negative. This can be understood through the fact that these websites are extremely addictive and incredibly dangerous as well. Therefore, social network site consumption should be limited in our lives.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic. The use of social media, e.g. Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words Anwser: Social media has now proven to be one of the biggest parts of our lives. Some regard it as an indispensable tool, while others feel concerned about its impact on our social lives. This essay will delve into the positive and negative sides of social applications, as well as provide examples and arguments on why I personally believe that the disadvantages overshadow the benefits of the indicated development. To begin with, websites like Twitter have proven to aid in connecting individuals all over the globe, enhancing their wealth of knowledge. In other words, with social networks, the public is more aware of the cultures and experiences that they otherwise would never be in the know of. For example, there has been a trend named #BlackLivesMatter, which sheds light on the discrimination that coloured people experience in Western countries. Without social media platforms, many would stay ignorant of the racism that runs rampant in these countries. On the contrary, social websites could also bring irreversible damage to a person's mental health. One of these occurrences is that the Web serves as a coping mechanism for many to use, which discourages them from enduring the hardships of life. To exemplify, Hikikomori is a Japanese term for the crowd who are Internet addicts, staying in their rooms to escape the outside world. Moreover, mass media is not safe. Simply speaking, they create breeding grounds for the community with nefarious intents. A small portion of these instances would be the many accounts of not only information stealing, but also grooming, paedophilia and cyberbullying. In conclusion, although the World Wide Web is a useful tool to help the public connect, I believe that its influence is predominantly negative. This can be understood through the fact that these websites are extremely addictive and incredibly dangerous as well. Therefore, social network site consumption should be limited in our lives. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic. The use of social media, e.g. Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words Anwser: Social media has now proven to be one of the biggest parts of our lives. Some regard it as an indispensable tool, while others feel concerned about its impact on our social lives. This essay will delve into the positive and negative sides of social applications, as well as provide examples and arguments on why I personally believe that the disadvantages overshadow the benefits of the indicated development. To begin with, websites like Twitter have proven to aid in connecting individuals all over the globe, enhancing their wealth of knowledge. In other words, with social networks, the public is more aware of the cultures and experiences that they otherwise would never be in the know of. For example, there has been a trend named #BlackLivesMatter, which sheds light on the discrimination that coloured people experience in Western countries. Without social media platforms, many would stay ignorant of the racism that runs rampant in these countries. On the contrary, social websites could also bring irreversible damage to a person's mental health. One of these occurrences is that the Web serves as a coping mechanism for many to use, which discourages them from enduring the hardships of life. To exemplify, Hikikomori is a Japanese term for the crowd who are Internet addicts, staying in their rooms to escape the outside world. Moreover, mass media is not safe. Simply speaking, they create breeding grounds for the community with nefarious intents. A small portion of these instances would be the many accounts of not only information stealing, but also grooming, paedophilia and cyberbullying. In conclusion, although the World Wide Web is a useful tool to help the public connect, I believe that its influence is predominantly negative. This can be understood through the fact that these websites are extremely addictive and incredibly dangerous as well. Therefore, social network site consumption should be limited in our lives.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic. The use of social media, e.g. Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words Anwser: Social media has now proven to be one of the biggest parts of our lives. Some regard it as an indispensable tool, while others feel concerned about its impact on our social lives. This essay will delve into the positive and negative sides of social applications, as well as provide examples and arguments on why I personally believe that the disadvantages overshadow the benefits of the indicated development. To begin with, websites like Twitter have proven to aid in connecting individuals all over the globe, enhancing their wealth of knowledge. In other words, with social networks, the public is more aware of the cultures and experiences that they otherwise would never be in the know of. For example, there has been a trend named #BlackLivesMatter, which sheds light on the discrimination that coloured people experience in Western countries. Without social media platforms, many would stay ignorant of the racism that runs rampant in these countries. On the contrary, social websites could also bring irreversible damage to a person's mental health. One of these occurrences is that the Web serves as a coping mechanism for many to use, which discourages them from enduring the hardships of life. To exemplify, Hikikomori is a Japanese term for the crowd who are Internet addicts, staying in their rooms to escape the outside world. Moreover, mass media is not safe. Simply speaking, they create breeding grounds for the community with nefarious intents. A small portion of these instances would be the many accounts of not only information stealing, but also grooming, paedophilia and cyberbullying. In conclusion, although the World Wide Web is a useful tool to help the public connect, I believe that its influence is predominantly negative. This can be understood through the fact that these websites are extremely addictive and incredibly dangerous as well. Therefore, social network site consumption should be limited in our lives. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic. The use of social media, e.g. Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words Anwser: Social media has now proven to be one of the biggest parts of our lives. Some regard it as an indispensable tool, while others feel concerned about its impact on our social lives. This essay will delve into the positive and negative sides of social applications, as well as provide examples and arguments on why I personally believe that the disadvantages overshadow the benefits of the indicated development. To begin with, websites like Twitter have proven to aid in connecting individuals all over the globe, enhancing their wealth of knowledge. In other words, with social networks, the public is more aware of the cultures and experiences that they otherwise would never be in the know of. For example, there has been a trend named #BlackLivesMatter, which sheds light on the discrimination that coloured people experience in Western countries. Without social media platforms, many would stay ignorant of the racism that runs rampant in these countries. On the contrary, social websites could also bring irreversible damage to a person's mental health. One of these occurrences is that the Web serves as a coping mechanism for many to use, which discourages them from enduring the hardships of life. To exemplify, Hikikomori is a Japanese term for the crowd who are Internet addicts, staying in their rooms to escape the outside world. Moreover, mass media is not safe. Simply speaking, they create breeding grounds for the community with nefarious intents. A small portion of these instances would be the many accounts of not only information stealing, but also grooming, paedophilia and cyberbullying. In conclusion, although the World Wide Web is a useful tool to help the public connect, I believe that its influence is predominantly negative. This can be understood through the fact that these websites are extremely addictive and incredibly dangerous as well. Therefore, social network site consumption should be limited in our lives.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic. The use of social media, e.g. Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words Anwser: Social media has now proven to be one of the biggest parts of our lives. Some regard it as an indispensable tool, while others feel concerned about its impact on our social lives. This essay will delve into the positive and negative sides of social applications, as well as provide examples and arguments on why I personally believe that the disadvantages overshadow the benefits of the indicated development. To begin with, websites like Twitter have proven to aid in connecting individuals all over the globe, enhancing their wealth of knowledge. In other words, with social networks, the public is more aware of the cultures and experiences that they otherwise would never be in the know of. For example, there has been a trend named #BlackLivesMatter, which sheds light on the discrimination that coloured people experience in Western countries. Without social media platforms, many would stay ignorant of the racism that runs rampant in these countries. On the contrary, social websites could also bring irreversible damage to a person's mental health. One of these occurrences is that the Web serves as a coping mechanism for many to use, which discourages them from enduring the hardships of life. To exemplify, Hikikomori is a Japanese term for the crowd who are Internet addicts, staying in their rooms to escape the outside world. Moreover, mass media is not safe. Simply speaking, they create breeding grounds for the community with nefarious intents. A small portion of these instances would be the many accounts of not only information stealing, but also grooming, paedophilia and cyberbullying. In conclusion, although the World Wide Web is a useful tool to help the public connect, I believe that its influence is predominantly negative. This can be understood through the fact that these websites are extremely addictive and incredibly dangerous as well. Therefore, social network site consumption should be limited in our lives. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic. The use of social media, e.g. Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words Anwser: Social media has now proven to be one of the biggest parts of our lives. Some regard it as an indispensable tool, while others feel concerned about its impact on our social lives. This essay will delve into the positive and negative sides of social applications, as well as provide examples and arguments on why I personally believe that the disadvantages overshadow the benefits of the indicated development. To begin with, websites like Twitter have proven to aid in connecting individuals all over the globe, enhancing their wealth of knowledge. In other words, with social networks, the public is more aware of the cultures and experiences that they otherwise would never be in the know of. For example, there has been a trend named #BlackLivesMatter, which sheds light on the discrimination that coloured people experience in Western countries. Without social media platforms, many would stay ignorant of the racism that runs rampant in these countries. On the contrary, social websites could also bring irreversible damage to a person's mental health. One of these occurrences is that the Web serves as a coping mechanism for many to use, which discourages them from enduring the hardships of life. To exemplify, Hikikomori is a Japanese term for the crowd who are Internet addicts, staying in their rooms to escape the outside world. Moreover, mass media is not safe. Simply speaking, they create breeding grounds for the community with nefarious intents. A small portion of these instances would be the many accounts of not only information stealing, but also grooming, paedophilia and cyberbullying. In conclusion, although the World Wide Web is a useful tool to help the public connect, I believe that its influence is predominantly negative. This can be understood through the fact that these websites are extremely addictive and incredibly dangerous as well. Therefore, social network site consumption should be limited in our lives.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic. The use of social media, e.g. Facebook and Twitter, is replacing face-to-face contact for many people in everyday life. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words Anwser: Social media has now proven to be one of the biggest parts of our lives. Some regard it as an indispensable tool, while others feel concerned about its impact on our social lives. This essay will delve into the positive and negative sides of social applications, as well as provide examples and arguments on why I personally believe that the disadvantages overshadow the benefits of the indicated development. To begin with, websites like Twitter have proven to aid in connecting individuals all over the globe, enhancing their wealth of knowledge. In other words, with social networks, the public is more aware of the cultures and experiences that they otherwise would never be in the know of. For example, there has been a trend named #BlackLivesMatter, which sheds light on the discrimination that coloured people experience in Western countries. Without social media platforms, many would stay ignorant of the racism that runs rampant in these countries. On the contrary, social websites could also bring irreversible damage to a person's mental health. One of these occurrences is that the Web serves as a coping mechanism for many to use, which discourages them from enduring the hardships of life. To exemplify, Hikikomori is a Japanese term for the crowd who are Internet addicts, staying in their rooms to escape the outside world. Moreover, mass media is not safe. Simply speaking, they create breeding grounds for the community with nefarious intents. A small portion of these instances would be the many accounts of not only information stealing, but also grooming, paedophilia and cyberbullying. In conclusion, although the World Wide Web is a useful tool to help the public connect, I believe that its influence is predominantly negative. This can be understood through the fact that these websites are extremely addictive and incredibly dangerous as well. Therefore, social network site consumption should be limited in our lives. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: in many countries men and women are working full time it is therefore logical for both men and women to share their house hold tasks. to what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In numerous societies, household chores are shared between spouses because both of them are working long hours. In my opinion, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea as it is essential to support each other. It is my view that what couples need is a sense of satisfaction in their relationship and since they have each other's support they are more likely to have a better life. Not only do they love each other more but also they learn to take care of their interaction. Moreover, they find it simplified to talk about their daily staff as they consider a time for chatting which results in augmenting their relationship. For example, if a man lies in front of the TV and the woman has to do all the household tasks at the end of the night, that woman will be exhausted and the man will be ready for sleep. Therefore, dividing household chores plays a vital role in the relationship of two people who are working full time. In contrast, some people claim that cleaning the house and related staff are the women's duties. They insist that their wives can stay at home and not work outside the house. However, I do not find this argument convincing as if spouses strive for their purposes, they will be more likely to achieve their aims in a shorter time. Doing household tasks has nothing to do with gender as in this contemporary era, women and men are equal and they have the same rights. Consequently, people should change their attitude towards sharing household chores since they seek to achieve their goals. In conclusion, I completely agree that sharing house tasks is logical between spouses who are working full time because it is a decisive factor in reinforcing their relationship. Also, they will be in the right direction in gaining their purposes as they have each other's support.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: in many countries men and women are working full time it is therefore logical for both men and women to share their house hold tasks. to what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In numerous societies, household chores are shared between spouses because both of them are working long hours. In my opinion, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea as it is essential to support each other. It is my view that what couples need is a sense of satisfaction in their relationship and since they have each other's support they are more likely to have a better life. Not only do they love each other more but also they learn to take care of their interaction. Moreover, they find it simplified to talk about their daily staff as they consider a time for chatting which results in augmenting their relationship. For example, if a man lies in front of the TV and the woman has to do all the household tasks at the end of the night, that woman will be exhausted and the man will be ready for sleep. Therefore, dividing household chores plays a vital role in the relationship of two people who are working full time. In contrast, some people claim that cleaning the house and related staff are the women's duties. They insist that their wives can stay at home and not work outside the house. However, I do not find this argument convincing as if spouses strive for their purposes, they will be more likely to achieve their aims in a shorter time. Doing household tasks has nothing to do with gender as in this contemporary era, women and men are equal and they have the same rights. Consequently, people should change their attitude towards sharing household chores since they seek to achieve their goals. In conclusion, I completely agree that sharing house tasks is logical between spouses who are working full time because it is a decisive factor in reinforcing their relationship. Also, they will be in the right direction in gaining their purposes as they have each other's support. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: in many countries men and women are working full time it is therefore logical for both men and women to share their house hold tasks. to what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In numerous societies, household chores are shared between spouses because both of them are working long hours. In my opinion, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea as it is essential to support each other. It is my view that what couples need is a sense of satisfaction in their relationship and since they have each other's support they are more likely to have a better life. Not only do they love each other more but also they learn to take care of their interaction. Moreover, they find it simplified to talk about their daily staff as they consider a time for chatting which results in augmenting their relationship. For example, if a man lies in front of the TV and the woman has to do all the household tasks at the end of the night, that woman will be exhausted and the man will be ready for sleep. Therefore, dividing household chores plays a vital role in the relationship of two people who are working full time. In contrast, some people claim that cleaning the house and related staff are the women's duties. They insist that their wives can stay at home and not work outside the house. However, I do not find this argument convincing as if spouses strive for their purposes, they will be more likely to achieve their aims in a shorter time. Doing household tasks has nothing to do with gender as in this contemporary era, women and men are equal and they have the same rights. Consequently, people should change their attitude towards sharing household chores since they seek to achieve their goals. In conclusion, I completely agree that sharing house tasks is logical between spouses who are working full time because it is a decisive factor in reinforcing their relationship. Also, they will be in the right direction in gaining their purposes as they have each other's support.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: in many countries men and women are working full time it is therefore logical for both men and women to share their house hold tasks. to what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In numerous societies, household chores are shared between spouses because both of them are working long hours. In my opinion, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea as it is essential to support each other. It is my view that what couples need is a sense of satisfaction in their relationship and since they have each other's support they are more likely to have a better life. Not only do they love each other more but also they learn to take care of their interaction. Moreover, they find it simplified to talk about their daily staff as they consider a time for chatting which results in augmenting their relationship. For example, if a man lies in front of the TV and the woman has to do all the household tasks at the end of the night, that woman will be exhausted and the man will be ready for sleep. Therefore, dividing household chores plays a vital role in the relationship of two people who are working full time. In contrast, some people claim that cleaning the house and related staff are the women's duties. They insist that their wives can stay at home and not work outside the house. However, I do not find this argument convincing as if spouses strive for their purposes, they will be more likely to achieve their aims in a shorter time. Doing household tasks has nothing to do with gender as in this contemporary era, women and men are equal and they have the same rights. Consequently, people should change their attitude towards sharing household chores since they seek to achieve their goals. In conclusion, I completely agree that sharing house tasks is logical between spouses who are working full time because it is a decisive factor in reinforcing their relationship. Also, they will be in the right direction in gaining their purposes as they have each other's support. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: in many countries men and women are working full time it is therefore logical for both men and women to share their house hold tasks. to what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In numerous societies, household chores are shared between spouses because both of them are working long hours. In my opinion, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea as it is essential to support each other. It is my view that what couples need is a sense of satisfaction in their relationship and since they have each other's support they are more likely to have a better life. Not only do they love each other more but also they learn to take care of their interaction. Moreover, they find it simplified to talk about their daily staff as they consider a time for chatting which results in augmenting their relationship. For example, if a man lies in front of the TV and the woman has to do all the household tasks at the end of the night, that woman will be exhausted and the man will be ready for sleep. Therefore, dividing household chores plays a vital role in the relationship of two people who are working full time. In contrast, some people claim that cleaning the house and related staff are the women's duties. They insist that their wives can stay at home and not work outside the house. However, I do not find this argument convincing as if spouses strive for their purposes, they will be more likely to achieve their aims in a shorter time. Doing household tasks has nothing to do with gender as in this contemporary era, women and men are equal and they have the same rights. Consequently, people should change their attitude towards sharing household chores since they seek to achieve their goals. In conclusion, I completely agree that sharing house tasks is logical between spouses who are working full time because it is a decisive factor in reinforcing their relationship. Also, they will be in the right direction in gaining their purposes as they have each other's support.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: in many countries men and women are working full time it is therefore logical for both men and women to share their house hold tasks. to what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In numerous societies, household chores are shared between spouses because both of them are working long hours. In my opinion, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea as it is essential to support each other. It is my view that what couples need is a sense of satisfaction in their relationship and since they have each other's support they are more likely to have a better life. Not only do they love each other more but also they learn to take care of their interaction. Moreover, they find it simplified to talk about their daily staff as they consider a time for chatting which results in augmenting their relationship. For example, if a man lies in front of the TV and the woman has to do all the household tasks at the end of the night, that woman will be exhausted and the man will be ready for sleep. Therefore, dividing household chores plays a vital role in the relationship of two people who are working full time. In contrast, some people claim that cleaning the house and related staff are the women's duties. They insist that their wives can stay at home and not work outside the house. However, I do not find this argument convincing as if spouses strive for their purposes, they will be more likely to achieve their aims in a shorter time. Doing household tasks has nothing to do with gender as in this contemporary era, women and men are equal and they have the same rights. Consequently, people should change their attitude towards sharing household chores since they seek to achieve their goals. In conclusion, I completely agree that sharing house tasks is logical between spouses who are working full time because it is a decisive factor in reinforcing their relationship. Also, they will be in the right direction in gaining their purposes as they have each other's support. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: in many countries men and women are working full time it is therefore logical for both men and women to share their house hold tasks. to what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In numerous societies, household chores are shared between spouses because both of them are working long hours. In my opinion, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea as it is essential to support each other. It is my view that what couples need is a sense of satisfaction in their relationship and since they have each other's support they are more likely to have a better life. Not only do they love each other more but also they learn to take care of their interaction. Moreover, they find it simplified to talk about their daily staff as they consider a time for chatting which results in augmenting their relationship. For example, if a man lies in front of the TV and the woman has to do all the household tasks at the end of the night, that woman will be exhausted and the man will be ready for sleep. Therefore, dividing household chores plays a vital role in the relationship of two people who are working full time. In contrast, some people claim that cleaning the house and related staff are the women's duties. They insist that their wives can stay at home and not work outside the house. However, I do not find this argument convincing as if spouses strive for their purposes, they will be more likely to achieve their aims in a shorter time. Doing household tasks has nothing to do with gender as in this contemporary era, women and men are equal and they have the same rights. Consequently, people should change their attitude towards sharing household chores since they seek to achieve their goals. In conclusion, I completely agree that sharing house tasks is logical between spouses who are working full time because it is a decisive factor in reinforcing their relationship. Also, they will be in the right direction in gaining their purposes as they have each other's support.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: in many countries men and women are working full time it is therefore logical for both men and women to share their house hold tasks. to what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: In numerous societies, household chores are shared between spouses because both of them are working long hours. In my opinion, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea as it is essential to support each other. It is my view that what couples need is a sense of satisfaction in their relationship and since they have each other's support they are more likely to have a better life. Not only do they love each other more but also they learn to take care of their interaction. Moreover, they find it simplified to talk about their daily staff as they consider a time for chatting which results in augmenting their relationship. For example, if a man lies in front of the TV and the woman has to do all the household tasks at the end of the night, that woman will be exhausted and the man will be ready for sleep. Therefore, dividing household chores plays a vital role in the relationship of two people who are working full time. In contrast, some people claim that cleaning the house and related staff are the women's duties. They insist that their wives can stay at home and not work outside the house. However, I do not find this argument convincing as if spouses strive for their purposes, they will be more likely to achieve their aims in a shorter time. Doing household tasks has nothing to do with gender as in this contemporary era, women and men are equal and they have the same rights. Consequently, people should change their attitude towards sharing household chores since they seek to achieve their goals. In conclusion, I completely agree that sharing house tasks is logical between spouses who are working full time because it is a decisive factor in reinforcing their relationship. Also, they will be in the right direction in gaining their purposes as they have each other's support. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Many people think living in high-rise apartment blocks makes people feel longely and unhappy, while others argue it has advantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Due to the development of modernisation, governments allow real estate companies to build more skyscrapers in the city area. Some individuals argue that this condition creates loneliness and displeasure for certain groups of folks. I agree with someone who opines that the construction of tall building apartments has its own benefits for society. On the one hand, it is true that apartments in tower buildings have several good points. First, living in high-rise apartments gives people some daily-life convenience. Normally, apartment constructions are located in the centre of the city, where residents can easily reach various routes of public transportation, shopping centres and hospitals. Second, tall-building flats can attract youngsters and new immigrants from other places to settle down in the cities. The price of buying a flat is much more affordable than purchasing a house, especially for these new residents. Third, the existence of apartments in the tower buildings can help boost the rate of employment. The rental of apartments is cheaper than commercial real-estate properties and then it gives an opportunity for people to start small businesses such as hair salons, nail beauty offices and tattoo studios. On the other hand, in my view of point, a human living in the sky structure suffers loneliness and displeasure. The main reason that condo residents feel lonely is that there is no community activity organised by property companies. Therefore, people do not have any connections with their neighbours, and they are not able to obtain instant support when they face small life issues. In addition, people who live in tall buildings are not happy due to the unhealthy living environment. Since most of the tower buildings are based in downtown areas, there are fewer greeneries and more air and noise pollution, as a result, human beings in the tall property cannot breathe fresh air and take a good rest. Furthermore, due to long-term loneliness and unenjoyment, it will eventually cause problems to human well-being including anxiety and depression. In conclusion, the development of high-rise apartment blocks brings benefits to human beings, however, I believe people can enjoy their life more and be healthier when living in a non-crowded community.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Many people think living in high-rise apartment blocks makes people feel longely and unhappy, while others argue it has advantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Due to the development of modernisation, governments allow real estate companies to build more skyscrapers in the city area. Some individuals argue that this condition creates loneliness and displeasure for certain groups of folks. I agree with someone who opines that the construction of tall building apartments has its own benefits for society. On the one hand, it is true that apartments in tower buildings have several good points. First, living in high-rise apartments gives people some daily-life convenience. Normally, apartment constructions are located in the centre of the city, where residents can easily reach various routes of public transportation, shopping centres and hospitals. Second, tall-building flats can attract youngsters and new immigrants from other places to settle down in the cities. The price of buying a flat is much more affordable than purchasing a house, especially for these new residents. Third, the existence of apartments in the tower buildings can help boost the rate of employment. The rental of apartments is cheaper than commercial real-estate properties and then it gives an opportunity for people to start small businesses such as hair salons, nail beauty offices and tattoo studios. On the other hand, in my view of point, a human living in the sky structure suffers loneliness and displeasure. The main reason that condo residents feel lonely is that there is no community activity organised by property companies. Therefore, people do not have any connections with their neighbours, and they are not able to obtain instant support when they face small life issues. In addition, people who live in tall buildings are not happy due to the unhealthy living environment. Since most of the tower buildings are based in downtown areas, there are fewer greeneries and more air and noise pollution, as a result, human beings in the tall property cannot breathe fresh air and take a good rest. Furthermore, due to long-term loneliness and unenjoyment, it will eventually cause problems to human well-being including anxiety and depression. In conclusion, the development of high-rise apartment blocks brings benefits to human beings, however, I believe people can enjoy their life more and be healthier when living in a non-crowded community. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Many people think living in high-rise apartment blocks makes people feel longely and unhappy, while others argue it has advantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Due to the development of modernisation, governments allow real estate companies to build more skyscrapers in the city area. Some individuals argue that this condition creates loneliness and displeasure for certain groups of folks. I agree with someone who opines that the construction of tall building apartments has its own benefits for society. On the one hand, it is true that apartments in tower buildings have several good points. First, living in high-rise apartments gives people some daily-life convenience. Normally, apartment constructions are located in the centre of the city, where residents can easily reach various routes of public transportation, shopping centres and hospitals. Second, tall-building flats can attract youngsters and new immigrants from other places to settle down in the cities. The price of buying a flat is much more affordable than purchasing a house, especially for these new residents. Third, the existence of apartments in the tower buildings can help boost the rate of employment. The rental of apartments is cheaper than commercial real-estate properties and then it gives an opportunity for people to start small businesses such as hair salons, nail beauty offices and tattoo studios. On the other hand, in my view of point, a human living in the sky structure suffers loneliness and displeasure. The main reason that condo residents feel lonely is that there is no community activity organised by property companies. Therefore, people do not have any connections with their neighbours, and they are not able to obtain instant support when they face small life issues. In addition, people who live in tall buildings are not happy due to the unhealthy living environment. Since most of the tower buildings are based in downtown areas, there are fewer greeneries and more air and noise pollution, as a result, human beings in the tall property cannot breathe fresh air and take a good rest. Furthermore, due to long-term loneliness and unenjoyment, it will eventually cause problems to human well-being including anxiety and depression. In conclusion, the development of high-rise apartment blocks brings benefits to human beings, however, I believe people can enjoy their life more and be healthier when living in a non-crowded community.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Many people think living in high-rise apartment blocks makes people feel longely and unhappy, while others argue it has advantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Due to the development of modernisation, governments allow real estate companies to build more skyscrapers in the city area. Some individuals argue that this condition creates loneliness and displeasure for certain groups of folks. I agree with someone who opines that the construction of tall building apartments has its own benefits for society. On the one hand, it is true that apartments in tower buildings have several good points. First, living in high-rise apartments gives people some daily-life convenience. Normally, apartment constructions are located in the centre of the city, where residents can easily reach various routes of public transportation, shopping centres and hospitals. Second, tall-building flats can attract youngsters and new immigrants from other places to settle down in the cities. The price of buying a flat is much more affordable than purchasing a house, especially for these new residents. Third, the existence of apartments in the tower buildings can help boost the rate of employment. The rental of apartments is cheaper than commercial real-estate properties and then it gives an opportunity for people to start small businesses such as hair salons, nail beauty offices and tattoo studios. On the other hand, in my view of point, a human living in the sky structure suffers loneliness and displeasure. The main reason that condo residents feel lonely is that there is no community activity organised by property companies. Therefore, people do not have any connections with their neighbours, and they are not able to obtain instant support when they face small life issues. In addition, people who live in tall buildings are not happy due to the unhealthy living environment. Since most of the tower buildings are based in downtown areas, there are fewer greeneries and more air and noise pollution, as a result, human beings in the tall property cannot breathe fresh air and take a good rest. Furthermore, due to long-term loneliness and unenjoyment, it will eventually cause problems to human well-being including anxiety and depression. In conclusion, the development of high-rise apartment blocks brings benefits to human beings, however, I believe people can enjoy their life more and be healthier when living in a non-crowded community. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Many people think living in high-rise apartment blocks makes people feel longely and unhappy, while others argue it has advantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Due to the development of modernisation, governments allow real estate companies to build more skyscrapers in the city area. Some individuals argue that this condition creates loneliness and displeasure for certain groups of folks. I agree with someone who opines that the construction of tall building apartments has its own benefits for society. On the one hand, it is true that apartments in tower buildings have several good points. First, living in high-rise apartments gives people some daily-life convenience. Normally, apartment constructions are located in the centre of the city, where residents can easily reach various routes of public transportation, shopping centres and hospitals. Second, tall-building flats can attract youngsters and new immigrants from other places to settle down in the cities. The price of buying a flat is much more affordable than purchasing a house, especially for these new residents. Third, the existence of apartments in the tower buildings can help boost the rate of employment. The rental of apartments is cheaper than commercial real-estate properties and then it gives an opportunity for people to start small businesses such as hair salons, nail beauty offices and tattoo studios. On the other hand, in my view of point, a human living in the sky structure suffers loneliness and displeasure. The main reason that condo residents feel lonely is that there is no community activity organised by property companies. Therefore, people do not have any connections with their neighbours, and they are not able to obtain instant support when they face small life issues. In addition, people who live in tall buildings are not happy due to the unhealthy living environment. Since most of the tower buildings are based in downtown areas, there are fewer greeneries and more air and noise pollution, as a result, human beings in the tall property cannot breathe fresh air and take a good rest. Furthermore, due to long-term loneliness and unenjoyment, it will eventually cause problems to human well-being including anxiety and depression. In conclusion, the development of high-rise apartment blocks brings benefits to human beings, however, I believe people can enjoy their life more and be healthier when living in a non-crowded community.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Many people think living in high-rise apartment blocks makes people feel longely and unhappy, while others argue it has advantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Due to the development of modernisation, governments allow real estate companies to build more skyscrapers in the city area. Some individuals argue that this condition creates loneliness and displeasure for certain groups of folks. I agree with someone who opines that the construction of tall building apartments has its own benefits for society. On the one hand, it is true that apartments in tower buildings have several good points. First, living in high-rise apartments gives people some daily-life convenience. Normally, apartment constructions are located in the centre of the city, where residents can easily reach various routes of public transportation, shopping centres and hospitals. Second, tall-building flats can attract youngsters and new immigrants from other places to settle down in the cities. The price of buying a flat is much more affordable than purchasing a house, especially for these new residents. Third, the existence of apartments in the tower buildings can help boost the rate of employment. The rental of apartments is cheaper than commercial real-estate properties and then it gives an opportunity for people to start small businesses such as hair salons, nail beauty offices and tattoo studios. On the other hand, in my view of point, a human living in the sky structure suffers loneliness and displeasure. The main reason that condo residents feel lonely is that there is no community activity organised by property companies. Therefore, people do not have any connections with their neighbours, and they are not able to obtain instant support when they face small life issues. In addition, people who live in tall buildings are not happy due to the unhealthy living environment. Since most of the tower buildings are based in downtown areas, there are fewer greeneries and more air and noise pollution, as a result, human beings in the tall property cannot breathe fresh air and take a good rest. Furthermore, due to long-term loneliness and unenjoyment, it will eventually cause problems to human well-being including anxiety and depression. In conclusion, the development of high-rise apartment blocks brings benefits to human beings, however, I believe people can enjoy their life more and be healthier when living in a non-crowded community. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Many people think living in high-rise apartment blocks makes people feel longely and unhappy, while others argue it has advantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Due to the development of modernisation, governments allow real estate companies to build more skyscrapers in the city area. Some individuals argue that this condition creates loneliness and displeasure for certain groups of folks. I agree with someone who opines that the construction of tall building apartments has its own benefits for society. On the one hand, it is true that apartments in tower buildings have several good points. First, living in high-rise apartments gives people some daily-life convenience. Normally, apartment constructions are located in the centre of the city, where residents can easily reach various routes of public transportation, shopping centres and hospitals. Second, tall-building flats can attract youngsters and new immigrants from other places to settle down in the cities. The price of buying a flat is much more affordable than purchasing a house, especially for these new residents. Third, the existence of apartments in the tower buildings can help boost the rate of employment. The rental of apartments is cheaper than commercial real-estate properties and then it gives an opportunity for people to start small businesses such as hair salons, nail beauty offices and tattoo studios. On the other hand, in my view of point, a human living in the sky structure suffers loneliness and displeasure. The main reason that condo residents feel lonely is that there is no community activity organised by property companies. Therefore, people do not have any connections with their neighbours, and they are not able to obtain instant support when they face small life issues. In addition, people who live in tall buildings are not happy due to the unhealthy living environment. Since most of the tower buildings are based in downtown areas, there are fewer greeneries and more air and noise pollution, as a result, human beings in the tall property cannot breathe fresh air and take a good rest. Furthermore, due to long-term loneliness and unenjoyment, it will eventually cause problems to human well-being including anxiety and depression. In conclusion, the development of high-rise apartment blocks brings benefits to human beings, however, I believe people can enjoy their life more and be healthier when living in a non-crowded community.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Many people think living in high-rise apartment blocks makes people feel longely and unhappy, while others argue it has advantages. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Anwser: Due to the development of modernisation, governments allow real estate companies to build more skyscrapers in the city area. Some individuals argue that this condition creates loneliness and displeasure for certain groups of folks. I agree with someone who opines that the construction of tall building apartments has its own benefits for society. On the one hand, it is true that apartments in tower buildings have several good points. First, living in high-rise apartments gives people some daily-life convenience. Normally, apartment constructions are located in the centre of the city, where residents can easily reach various routes of public transportation, shopping centres and hospitals. Second, tall-building flats can attract youngsters and new immigrants from other places to settle down in the cities. The price of buying a flat is much more affordable than purchasing a house, especially for these new residents. Third, the existence of apartments in the tower buildings can help boost the rate of employment. The rental of apartments is cheaper than commercial real-estate properties and then it gives an opportunity for people to start small businesses such as hair salons, nail beauty offices and tattoo studios. On the other hand, in my view of point, a human living in the sky structure suffers loneliness and displeasure. The main reason that condo residents feel lonely is that there is no community activity organised by property companies. Therefore, people do not have any connections with their neighbours, and they are not able to obtain instant support when they face small life issues. In addition, people who live in tall buildings are not happy due to the unhealthy living environment. Since most of the tower buildings are based in downtown areas, there are fewer greeneries and more air and noise pollution, as a result, human beings in the tall property cannot breathe fresh air and take a good rest. Furthermore, due to long-term loneliness and unenjoyment, it will eventually cause problems to human well-being including anxiety and depression. In conclusion, the development of high-rise apartment blocks brings benefits to human beings, however, I believe people can enjoy their life more and be healthier when living in a non-crowded community. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to have drivers tested every year. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some individuals argue that the most effective method to enhance road safety is to have drivers tested each term. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our automobile industries have developed; everyone can buy an auto, but we must pass the driver's licence test thus, the many cars on the roads also, accident rates are increasing. For example, in South Korea, the majority of aged communities still drive cars on the street but their cognitive skills are falling down as well as reflexes so it is a serious problem in society. Some old folks forget the pedal position and accidentally push the wrong pedal; hence, some people die because of that. So, at least aged communities should take the test each year which will reduce traffic calamities. Furthermore, nowadays, most drivers are 20~50 years old so, they do not need to take the analysis at each stage. However, some young individuals drink alcohol and drive a car, which causes big car accidents. For instance, in South Korea, many young communities have auto incidents especially when they are drunk thus, approximately 30% of innocent folks die on the road, which is a tragic situation. For this reason, young people also take tests every period, and if we find a drunken driving crime, we must cancel their driver's licence. This reduces automobile accidents, and our roads are much safer. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. Because of the rising number of old people, car accidents are increasing conversely young folks also have some problems. So, we should modify our laws and take the test every year which leads to making our societies much safer.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to have drivers tested every year. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some individuals argue that the most effective method to enhance road safety is to have drivers tested each term. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our automobile industries have developed; everyone can buy an auto, but we must pass the driver's licence test thus, the many cars on the roads also, accident rates are increasing. For example, in South Korea, the majority of aged communities still drive cars on the street but their cognitive skills are falling down as well as reflexes so it is a serious problem in society. Some old folks forget the pedal position and accidentally push the wrong pedal; hence, some people die because of that. So, at least aged communities should take the test each year which will reduce traffic calamities. Furthermore, nowadays, most drivers are 20~50 years old so, they do not need to take the analysis at each stage. However, some young individuals drink alcohol and drive a car, which causes big car accidents. For instance, in South Korea, many young communities have auto incidents especially when they are drunk thus, approximately 30% of innocent folks die on the road, which is a tragic situation. For this reason, young people also take tests every period, and if we find a drunken driving crime, we must cancel their driver's licence. This reduces automobile accidents, and our roads are much safer. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. Because of the rising number of old people, car accidents are increasing conversely young folks also have some problems. So, we should modify our laws and take the test every year which leads to making our societies much safer. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to have drivers tested every year. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some individuals argue that the most effective method to enhance road safety is to have drivers tested each term. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our automobile industries have developed; everyone can buy an auto, but we must pass the driver's licence test thus, the many cars on the roads also, accident rates are increasing. For example, in South Korea, the majority of aged communities still drive cars on the street but their cognitive skills are falling down as well as reflexes so it is a serious problem in society. Some old folks forget the pedal position and accidentally push the wrong pedal; hence, some people die because of that. So, at least aged communities should take the test each year which will reduce traffic calamities. Furthermore, nowadays, most drivers are 20~50 years old so, they do not need to take the analysis at each stage. However, some young individuals drink alcohol and drive a car, which causes big car accidents. For instance, in South Korea, many young communities have auto incidents especially when they are drunk thus, approximately 30% of innocent folks die on the road, which is a tragic situation. For this reason, young people also take tests every period, and if we find a drunken driving crime, we must cancel their driver's licence. This reduces automobile accidents, and our roads are much safer. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. Because of the rising number of old people, car accidents are increasing conversely young folks also have some problems. So, we should modify our laws and take the test every year which leads to making our societies much safer.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to have drivers tested every year. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some individuals argue that the most effective method to enhance road safety is to have drivers tested each term. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our automobile industries have developed; everyone can buy an auto, but we must pass the driver's licence test thus, the many cars on the roads also, accident rates are increasing. For example, in South Korea, the majority of aged communities still drive cars on the street but their cognitive skills are falling down as well as reflexes so it is a serious problem in society. Some old folks forget the pedal position and accidentally push the wrong pedal; hence, some people die because of that. So, at least aged communities should take the test each year which will reduce traffic calamities. Furthermore, nowadays, most drivers are 20~50 years old so, they do not need to take the analysis at each stage. However, some young individuals drink alcohol and drive a car, which causes big car accidents. For instance, in South Korea, many young communities have auto incidents especially when they are drunk thus, approximately 30% of innocent folks die on the road, which is a tragic situation. For this reason, young people also take tests every period, and if we find a drunken driving crime, we must cancel their driver's licence. This reduces automobile accidents, and our roads are much safer. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. Because of the rising number of old people, car accidents are increasing conversely young folks also have some problems. So, we should modify our laws and take the test every year which leads to making our societies much safer. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to have drivers tested every year. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some individuals argue that the most effective method to enhance road safety is to have drivers tested each term. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our automobile industries have developed; everyone can buy an auto, but we must pass the driver's licence test thus, the many cars on the roads also, accident rates are increasing. For example, in South Korea, the majority of aged communities still drive cars on the street but their cognitive skills are falling down as well as reflexes so it is a serious problem in society. Some old folks forget the pedal position and accidentally push the wrong pedal; hence, some people die because of that. So, at least aged communities should take the test each year which will reduce traffic calamities. Furthermore, nowadays, most drivers are 20~50 years old so, they do not need to take the analysis at each stage. However, some young individuals drink alcohol and drive a car, which causes big car accidents. For instance, in South Korea, many young communities have auto incidents especially when they are drunk thus, approximately 30% of innocent folks die on the road, which is a tragic situation. For this reason, young people also take tests every period, and if we find a drunken driving crime, we must cancel their driver's licence. This reduces automobile accidents, and our roads are much safer. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. Because of the rising number of old people, car accidents are increasing conversely young folks also have some problems. So, we should modify our laws and take the test every year which leads to making our societies much safer.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to have drivers tested every year. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some individuals argue that the most effective method to enhance road safety is to have drivers tested each term. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our automobile industries have developed; everyone can buy an auto, but we must pass the driver's licence test thus, the many cars on the roads also, accident rates are increasing. For example, in South Korea, the majority of aged communities still drive cars on the street but their cognitive skills are falling down as well as reflexes so it is a serious problem in society. Some old folks forget the pedal position and accidentally push the wrong pedal; hence, some people die because of that. So, at least aged communities should take the test each year which will reduce traffic calamities. Furthermore, nowadays, most drivers are 20~50 years old so, they do not need to take the analysis at each stage. However, some young individuals drink alcohol and drive a car, which causes big car accidents. For instance, in South Korea, many young communities have auto incidents especially when they are drunk thus, approximately 30% of innocent folks die on the road, which is a tragic situation. For this reason, young people also take tests every period, and if we find a drunken driving crime, we must cancel their driver's licence. This reduces automobile accidents, and our roads are much safer. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. Because of the rising number of old people, car accidents are increasing conversely young folks also have some problems. So, we should modify our laws and take the test every year which leads to making our societies much safer. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to have drivers tested every year. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some individuals argue that the most effective method to enhance road safety is to have drivers tested each term. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our automobile industries have developed; everyone can buy an auto, but we must pass the driver's licence test thus, the many cars on the roads also, accident rates are increasing. For example, in South Korea, the majority of aged communities still drive cars on the street but their cognitive skills are falling down as well as reflexes so it is a serious problem in society. Some old folks forget the pedal position and accidentally push the wrong pedal; hence, some people die because of that. So, at least aged communities should take the test each year which will reduce traffic calamities. Furthermore, nowadays, most drivers are 20~50 years old so, they do not need to take the analysis at each stage. However, some young individuals drink alcohol and drive a car, which causes big car accidents. For instance, in South Korea, many young communities have auto incidents especially when they are drunk thus, approximately 30% of innocent folks die on the road, which is a tragic situation. For this reason, young people also take tests every period, and if we find a drunken driving crime, we must cancel their driver's licence. This reduces automobile accidents, and our roads are much safer. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. Because of the rising number of old people, car accidents are increasing conversely young folks also have some problems. So, we should modify our laws and take the test every year which leads to making our societies much safer.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to have drivers tested every year. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some individuals argue that the most effective method to enhance road safety is to have drivers tested each term. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our automobile industries have developed; everyone can buy an auto, but we must pass the driver's licence test thus, the many cars on the roads also, accident rates are increasing. For example, in South Korea, the majority of aged communities still drive cars on the street but their cognitive skills are falling down as well as reflexes so it is a serious problem in society. Some old folks forget the pedal position and accidentally push the wrong pedal; hence, some people die because of that. So, at least aged communities should take the test each year which will reduce traffic calamities. Furthermore, nowadays, most drivers are 20~50 years old so, they do not need to take the analysis at each stage. However, some young individuals drink alcohol and drive a car, which causes big car accidents. For instance, in South Korea, many young communities have auto incidents especially when they are drunk thus, approximately 30% of innocent folks die on the road, which is a tragic situation. For this reason, young people also take tests every period, and if we find a drunken driving crime, we must cancel their driver's licence. This reduces automobile accidents, and our roads are much safer. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. Because of the rising number of old people, car accidents are increasing conversely young folks also have some problems. So, we should modify our laws and take the test every year which leads to making our societies much safer. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation? Anwser: Nowadays, the advantages of cheaper public transportation have sparked a heated debate and drawn widespread attention. Many argue that the advantage is mainly the reduction of toxins, but others argue that it also improves travel conditions. After thorough consideration of all relevant factors, I believe that cheaper public transit results in less contamination and fewer gridlocks. First and foremost, when viewed from the environmental perspective, it is evident that more affordable public shipment causes less contamination. Although the potentially negative impacts of more affordable public transportation must be taken into account, I still believe that public shipping has in many ways benefited us. For example, a prominent scientist once stated that people will travel more by public transport instead of private cars when public shipping becomes less expensive, and this reduces air pollution. It is thus clearly shown that one advantage of cheaper public transit is the reduction of air pollution. In addition, another social factor should also be considered. As far as society is concerned, the ultimate aim of public transportation is to make our lives more convenient. For instance, a recent article published in The Economist revealed that the problem of traffic jams can be significantly alleviated when people choose affordable public transport. Undoubtedly, this is a clear indication that another advantage of cheaper public shipment is fewer traffic jams. In conclusion, due to the reasons outlined above, I have a strong belief that the advantages of cheaper public transit are better air quality and eased congestion. In order to move things forward, all parties involved must make a concerted effort to communicate and start changing. With all our efforts, we can certainly make this world a much better place to live.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation? Anwser: Nowadays, the advantages of cheaper public transportation have sparked a heated debate and drawn widespread attention. Many argue that the advantage is mainly the reduction of toxins, but others argue that it also improves travel conditions. After thorough consideration of all relevant factors, I believe that cheaper public transit results in less contamination and fewer gridlocks. First and foremost, when viewed from the environmental perspective, it is evident that more affordable public shipment causes less contamination. Although the potentially negative impacts of more affordable public transportation must be taken into account, I still believe that public shipping has in many ways benefited us. For example, a prominent scientist once stated that people will travel more by public transport instead of private cars when public shipping becomes less expensive, and this reduces air pollution. It is thus clearly shown that one advantage of cheaper public transit is the reduction of air pollution. In addition, another social factor should also be considered. As far as society is concerned, the ultimate aim of public transportation is to make our lives more convenient. For instance, a recent article published in The Economist revealed that the problem of traffic jams can be significantly alleviated when people choose affordable public transport. Undoubtedly, this is a clear indication that another advantage of cheaper public shipment is fewer traffic jams. In conclusion, due to the reasons outlined above, I have a strong belief that the advantages of cheaper public transit are better air quality and eased congestion. In order to move things forward, all parties involved must make a concerted effort to communicate and start changing. With all our efforts, we can certainly make this world a much better place to live. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation? Anwser: Nowadays, the advantages of cheaper public transportation have sparked a heated debate and drawn widespread attention. Many argue that the advantage is mainly the reduction of toxins, but others argue that it also improves travel conditions. After thorough consideration of all relevant factors, I believe that cheaper public transit results in less contamination and fewer gridlocks. First and foremost, when viewed from the environmental perspective, it is evident that more affordable public shipment causes less contamination. Although the potentially negative impacts of more affordable public transportation must be taken into account, I still believe that public shipping has in many ways benefited us. For example, a prominent scientist once stated that people will travel more by public transport instead of private cars when public shipping becomes less expensive, and this reduces air pollution. It is thus clearly shown that one advantage of cheaper public transit is the reduction of air pollution. In addition, another social factor should also be considered. As far as society is concerned, the ultimate aim of public transportation is to make our lives more convenient. For instance, a recent article published in The Economist revealed that the problem of traffic jams can be significantly alleviated when people choose affordable public transport. Undoubtedly, this is a clear indication that another advantage of cheaper public shipment is fewer traffic jams. In conclusion, due to the reasons outlined above, I have a strong belief that the advantages of cheaper public transit are better air quality and eased congestion. In order to move things forward, all parties involved must make a concerted effort to communicate and start changing. With all our efforts, we can certainly make this world a much better place to live.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation? Anwser: Nowadays, the advantages of cheaper public transportation have sparked a heated debate and drawn widespread attention. Many argue that the advantage is mainly the reduction of toxins, but others argue that it also improves travel conditions. After thorough consideration of all relevant factors, I believe that cheaper public transit results in less contamination and fewer gridlocks. First and foremost, when viewed from the environmental perspective, it is evident that more affordable public shipment causes less contamination. Although the potentially negative impacts of more affordable public transportation must be taken into account, I still believe that public shipping has in many ways benefited us. For example, a prominent scientist once stated that people will travel more by public transport instead of private cars when public shipping becomes less expensive, and this reduces air pollution. It is thus clearly shown that one advantage of cheaper public transit is the reduction of air pollution. In addition, another social factor should also be considered. As far as society is concerned, the ultimate aim of public transportation is to make our lives more convenient. For instance, a recent article published in The Economist revealed that the problem of traffic jams can be significantly alleviated when people choose affordable public transport. Undoubtedly, this is a clear indication that another advantage of cheaper public shipment is fewer traffic jams. In conclusion, due to the reasons outlined above, I have a strong belief that the advantages of cheaper public transit are better air quality and eased congestion. In order to move things forward, all parties involved must make a concerted effort to communicate and start changing. With all our efforts, we can certainly make this world a much better place to live. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation? Anwser: Nowadays, the advantages of cheaper public transportation have sparked a heated debate and drawn widespread attention. Many argue that the advantage is mainly the reduction of toxins, but others argue that it also improves travel conditions. After thorough consideration of all relevant factors, I believe that cheaper public transit results in less contamination and fewer gridlocks. First and foremost, when viewed from the environmental perspective, it is evident that more affordable public shipment causes less contamination. Although the potentially negative impacts of more affordable public transportation must be taken into account, I still believe that public shipping has in many ways benefited us. For example, a prominent scientist once stated that people will travel more by public transport instead of private cars when public shipping becomes less expensive, and this reduces air pollution. It is thus clearly shown that one advantage of cheaper public transit is the reduction of air pollution. In addition, another social factor should also be considered. As far as society is concerned, the ultimate aim of public transportation is to make our lives more convenient. For instance, a recent article published in The Economist revealed that the problem of traffic jams can be significantly alleviated when people choose affordable public transport. Undoubtedly, this is a clear indication that another advantage of cheaper public shipment is fewer traffic jams. In conclusion, due to the reasons outlined above, I have a strong belief that the advantages of cheaper public transit are better air quality and eased congestion. In order to move things forward, all parties involved must make a concerted effort to communicate and start changing. With all our efforts, we can certainly make this world a much better place to live.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation? Anwser: Nowadays, the advantages of cheaper public transportation have sparked a heated debate and drawn widespread attention. Many argue that the advantage is mainly the reduction of toxins, but others argue that it also improves travel conditions. After thorough consideration of all relevant factors, I believe that cheaper public transit results in less contamination and fewer gridlocks. First and foremost, when viewed from the environmental perspective, it is evident that more affordable public shipment causes less contamination. Although the potentially negative impacts of more affordable public transportation must be taken into account, I still believe that public shipping has in many ways benefited us. For example, a prominent scientist once stated that people will travel more by public transport instead of private cars when public shipping becomes less expensive, and this reduces air pollution. It is thus clearly shown that one advantage of cheaper public transit is the reduction of air pollution. In addition, another social factor should also be considered. As far as society is concerned, the ultimate aim of public transportation is to make our lives more convenient. For instance, a recent article published in The Economist revealed that the problem of traffic jams can be significantly alleviated when people choose affordable public transport. Undoubtedly, this is a clear indication that another advantage of cheaper public shipment is fewer traffic jams. In conclusion, due to the reasons outlined above, I have a strong belief that the advantages of cheaper public transit are better air quality and eased congestion. In order to move things forward, all parties involved must make a concerted effort to communicate and start changing. With all our efforts, we can certainly make this world a much better place to live. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation? Anwser: Nowadays, the advantages of cheaper public transportation have sparked a heated debate and drawn widespread attention. Many argue that the advantage is mainly the reduction of toxins, but others argue that it also improves travel conditions. After thorough consideration of all relevant factors, I believe that cheaper public transit results in less contamination and fewer gridlocks. First and foremost, when viewed from the environmental perspective, it is evident that more affordable public shipment causes less contamination. Although the potentially negative impacts of more affordable public transportation must be taken into account, I still believe that public shipping has in many ways benefited us. For example, a prominent scientist once stated that people will travel more by public transport instead of private cars when public shipping becomes less expensive, and this reduces air pollution. It is thus clearly shown that one advantage of cheaper public transit is the reduction of air pollution. In addition, another social factor should also be considered. As far as society is concerned, the ultimate aim of public transportation is to make our lives more convenient. For instance, a recent article published in The Economist revealed that the problem of traffic jams can be significantly alleviated when people choose affordable public transport. Undoubtedly, this is a clear indication that another advantage of cheaper public shipment is fewer traffic jams. In conclusion, due to the reasons outlined above, I have a strong belief that the advantages of cheaper public transit are better air quality and eased congestion. In order to move things forward, all parties involved must make a concerted effort to communicate and start changing. With all our efforts, we can certainly make this world a much better place to live.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation? Anwser: Nowadays, the advantages of cheaper public transportation have sparked a heated debate and drawn widespread attention. Many argue that the advantage is mainly the reduction of toxins, but others argue that it also improves travel conditions. After thorough consideration of all relevant factors, I believe that cheaper public transit results in less contamination and fewer gridlocks. First and foremost, when viewed from the environmental perspective, it is evident that more affordable public shipment causes less contamination. Although the potentially negative impacts of more affordable public transportation must be taken into account, I still believe that public shipping has in many ways benefited us. For example, a prominent scientist once stated that people will travel more by public transport instead of private cars when public shipping becomes less expensive, and this reduces air pollution. It is thus clearly shown that one advantage of cheaper public transit is the reduction of air pollution. In addition, another social factor should also be considered. As far as society is concerned, the ultimate aim of public transportation is to make our lives more convenient. For instance, a recent article published in The Economist revealed that the problem of traffic jams can be significantly alleviated when people choose affordable public transport. Undoubtedly, this is a clear indication that another advantage of cheaper public shipment is fewer traffic jams. In conclusion, due to the reasons outlined above, I have a strong belief that the advantages of cheaper public transit are better air quality and eased congestion. In order to move things forward, all parties involved must make a concerted effort to communicate and start changing. With all our efforts, we can certainly make this world a much better place to live. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only those people who have worked for a company for many years should be promoted to a higher position. Do you agree? Anwser: There is an opinion that primarily staff members, who have dedicated many years to working for a particular company, should be given executive positions in a company. I disagree with this viewpoint inasmuch as younger workers may have more skills and if not provided with an opportunity for a promotion, they will become demotivated. Although senior employees have proven to be more reliable and loyal, more often than not, it is novices who have a wider cluster of relevant skills. This is because young specialists exert their full effort in mastering their hard and soft skills in order to meet the requirements of today's highly competitive job market. Therefore, having been promoted, such workers may bring innovation and help to better incorporate the latest technological advances into business processes which is irreplaceable for every company to flourish. For example, the average age of a new hire at Facebook is only 23, for this very purpose. Yet, another reason why less experienced staff members should have even chances for a promotion is that otherwise they will not be motivated to do their best. Knowing that however hard they try, they will not be given a higher position in a company, young employees will likely grow reluctant to go the extra mile, which may negatively affect a company's revenue and curb its development. To illustrate, a prominent entrepreneur Pavel Durov had to leave his first workplace since despite his outstanding abilities, he was not rewarded with a leading role. As a result, he has successfully set up his own business, while his employer lost his company due to a lack of highly qualified workers. To sum up, even though individuals who have worked fewer years for a particular company might be less trustworthy, they should be equally promoted as they have up-to-date knowledge and skill sets. Besides that, this will encourage them to apply their abilities to the fullest, thus contributing to the company’s prosperity.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only those people who have worked for a company for many years should be promoted to a higher position. Do you agree? Anwser: There is an opinion that primarily staff members, who have dedicated many years to working for a particular company, should be given executive positions in a company. I disagree with this viewpoint inasmuch as younger workers may have more skills and if not provided with an opportunity for a promotion, they will become demotivated. Although senior employees have proven to be more reliable and loyal, more often than not, it is novices who have a wider cluster of relevant skills. This is because young specialists exert their full effort in mastering their hard and soft skills in order to meet the requirements of today's highly competitive job market. Therefore, having been promoted, such workers may bring innovation and help to better incorporate the latest technological advances into business processes which is irreplaceable for every company to flourish. For example, the average age of a new hire at Facebook is only 23, for this very purpose. Yet, another reason why less experienced staff members should have even chances for a promotion is that otherwise they will not be motivated to do their best. Knowing that however hard they try, they will not be given a higher position in a company, young employees will likely grow reluctant to go the extra mile, which may negatively affect a company's revenue and curb its development. To illustrate, a prominent entrepreneur Pavel Durov had to leave his first workplace since despite his outstanding abilities, he was not rewarded with a leading role. As a result, he has successfully set up his own business, while his employer lost his company due to a lack of highly qualified workers. To sum up, even though individuals who have worked fewer years for a particular company might be less trustworthy, they should be equally promoted as they have up-to-date knowledge and skill sets. Besides that, this will encourage them to apply their abilities to the fullest, thus contributing to the company’s prosperity. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only those people who have worked for a company for many years should be promoted to a higher position. Do you agree? Anwser: There is an opinion that primarily staff members, who have dedicated many years to working for a particular company, should be given executive positions in a company. I disagree with this viewpoint inasmuch as younger workers may have more skills and if not provided with an opportunity for a promotion, they will become demotivated. Although senior employees have proven to be more reliable and loyal, more often than not, it is novices who have a wider cluster of relevant skills. This is because young specialists exert their full effort in mastering their hard and soft skills in order to meet the requirements of today's highly competitive job market. Therefore, having been promoted, such workers may bring innovation and help to better incorporate the latest technological advances into business processes which is irreplaceable for every company to flourish. For example, the average age of a new hire at Facebook is only 23, for this very purpose. Yet, another reason why less experienced staff members should have even chances for a promotion is that otherwise they will not be motivated to do their best. Knowing that however hard they try, they will not be given a higher position in a company, young employees will likely grow reluctant to go the extra mile, which may negatively affect a company's revenue and curb its development. To illustrate, a prominent entrepreneur Pavel Durov had to leave his first workplace since despite his outstanding abilities, he was not rewarded with a leading role. As a result, he has successfully set up his own business, while his employer lost his company due to a lack of highly qualified workers. To sum up, even though individuals who have worked fewer years for a particular company might be less trustworthy, they should be equally promoted as they have up-to-date knowledge and skill sets. Besides that, this will encourage them to apply their abilities to the fullest, thus contributing to the company’s prosperity.

Your lexical resource score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only those people who have worked for a company for many years should be promoted to a higher position. Do you agree? Anwser: There is an opinion that primarily staff members, who have dedicated many years to working for a particular company, should be given executive positions in a company. I disagree with this viewpoint inasmuch as younger workers may have more skills and if not provided with an opportunity for a promotion, they will become demotivated. Although senior employees have proven to be more reliable and loyal, more often than not, it is novices who have a wider cluster of relevant skills. This is because young specialists exert their full effort in mastering their hard and soft skills in order to meet the requirements of today's highly competitive job market. Therefore, having been promoted, such workers may bring innovation and help to better incorporate the latest technological advances into business processes which is irreplaceable for every company to flourish. For example, the average age of a new hire at Facebook is only 23, for this very purpose. Yet, another reason why less experienced staff members should have even chances for a promotion is that otherwise they will not be motivated to do their best. Knowing that however hard they try, they will not be given a higher position in a company, young employees will likely grow reluctant to go the extra mile, which may negatively affect a company's revenue and curb its development. To illustrate, a prominent entrepreneur Pavel Durov had to leave his first workplace since despite his outstanding abilities, he was not rewarded with a leading role. As a result, he has successfully set up his own business, while his employer lost his company due to a lack of highly qualified workers. To sum up, even though individuals who have worked fewer years for a particular company might be less trustworthy, they should be equally promoted as they have up-to-date knowledge and skill sets. Besides that, this will encourage them to apply their abilities to the fullest, thus contributing to the company’s prosperity. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only those people who have worked for a company for many years should be promoted to a higher position. Do you agree? Anwser: There is an opinion that primarily staff members, who have dedicated many years to working for a particular company, should be given executive positions in a company. I disagree with this viewpoint inasmuch as younger workers may have more skills and if not provided with an opportunity for a promotion, they will become demotivated. Although senior employees have proven to be more reliable and loyal, more often than not, it is novices who have a wider cluster of relevant skills. This is because young specialists exert their full effort in mastering their hard and soft skills in order to meet the requirements of today's highly competitive job market. Therefore, having been promoted, such workers may bring innovation and help to better incorporate the latest technological advances into business processes which is irreplaceable for every company to flourish. For example, the average age of a new hire at Facebook is only 23, for this very purpose. Yet, another reason why less experienced staff members should have even chances for a promotion is that otherwise they will not be motivated to do their best. Knowing that however hard they try, they will not be given a higher position in a company, young employees will likely grow reluctant to go the extra mile, which may negatively affect a company's revenue and curb its development. To illustrate, a prominent entrepreneur Pavel Durov had to leave his first workplace since despite his outstanding abilities, he was not rewarded with a leading role. As a result, he has successfully set up his own business, while his employer lost his company due to a lack of highly qualified workers. To sum up, even though individuals who have worked fewer years for a particular company might be less trustworthy, they should be equally promoted as they have up-to-date knowledge and skill sets. Besides that, this will encourage them to apply their abilities to the fullest, thus contributing to the company’s prosperity.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only those people who have worked for a company for many years should be promoted to a higher position. Do you agree? Anwser: There is an opinion that primarily staff members, who have dedicated many years to working for a particular company, should be given executive positions in a company. I disagree with this viewpoint inasmuch as younger workers may have more skills and if not provided with an opportunity for a promotion, they will become demotivated. Although senior employees have proven to be more reliable and loyal, more often than not, it is novices who have a wider cluster of relevant skills. This is because young specialists exert their full effort in mastering their hard and soft skills in order to meet the requirements of today's highly competitive job market. Therefore, having been promoted, such workers may bring innovation and help to better incorporate the latest technological advances into business processes which is irreplaceable for every company to flourish. For example, the average age of a new hire at Facebook is only 23, for this very purpose. Yet, another reason why less experienced staff members should have even chances for a promotion is that otherwise they will not be motivated to do their best. Knowing that however hard they try, they will not be given a higher position in a company, young employees will likely grow reluctant to go the extra mile, which may negatively affect a company's revenue and curb its development. To illustrate, a prominent entrepreneur Pavel Durov had to leave his first workplace since despite his outstanding abilities, he was not rewarded with a leading role. As a result, he has successfully set up his own business, while his employer lost his company due to a lack of highly qualified workers. To sum up, even though individuals who have worked fewer years for a particular company might be less trustworthy, they should be equally promoted as they have up-to-date knowledge and skill sets. Besides that, this will encourage them to apply their abilities to the fullest, thus contributing to the company’s prosperity. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only those people who have worked for a company for many years should be promoted to a higher position. Do you agree? Anwser: There is an opinion that primarily staff members, who have dedicated many years to working for a particular company, should be given executive positions in a company. I disagree with this viewpoint inasmuch as younger workers may have more skills and if not provided with an opportunity for a promotion, they will become demotivated. Although senior employees have proven to be more reliable and loyal, more often than not, it is novices who have a wider cluster of relevant skills. This is because young specialists exert their full effort in mastering their hard and soft skills in order to meet the requirements of today's highly competitive job market. Therefore, having been promoted, such workers may bring innovation and help to better incorporate the latest technological advances into business processes which is irreplaceable for every company to flourish. For example, the average age of a new hire at Facebook is only 23, for this very purpose. Yet, another reason why less experienced staff members should have even chances for a promotion is that otherwise they will not be motivated to do their best. Knowing that however hard they try, they will not be given a higher position in a company, young employees will likely grow reluctant to go the extra mile, which may negatively affect a company's revenue and curb its development. To illustrate, a prominent entrepreneur Pavel Durov had to leave his first workplace since despite his outstanding abilities, he was not rewarded with a leading role. As a result, he has successfully set up his own business, while his employer lost his company due to a lack of highly qualified workers. To sum up, even though individuals who have worked fewer years for a particular company might be less trustworthy, they should be equally promoted as they have up-to-date knowledge and skill sets. Besides that, this will encourage them to apply their abilities to the fullest, thus contributing to the company’s prosperity.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that only those people who have worked for a company for many years should be promoted to a higher position. Do you agree? Anwser: There is an opinion that primarily staff members, who have dedicated many years to working for a particular company, should be given executive positions in a company. I disagree with this viewpoint inasmuch as younger workers may have more skills and if not provided with an opportunity for a promotion, they will become demotivated. Although senior employees have proven to be more reliable and loyal, more often than not, it is novices who have a wider cluster of relevant skills. This is because young specialists exert their full effort in mastering their hard and soft skills in order to meet the requirements of today's highly competitive job market. Therefore, having been promoted, such workers may bring innovation and help to better incorporate the latest technological advances into business processes which is irreplaceable for every company to flourish. For example, the average age of a new hire at Facebook is only 23, for this very purpose. Yet, another reason why less experienced staff members should have even chances for a promotion is that otherwise they will not be motivated to do their best. Knowing that however hard they try, they will not be given a higher position in a company, young employees will likely grow reluctant to go the extra mile, which may negatively affect a company's revenue and curb its development. To illustrate, a prominent entrepreneur Pavel Durov had to leave his first workplace since despite his outstanding abilities, he was not rewarded with a leading role. As a result, he has successfully set up his own business, while his employer lost his company due to a lack of highly qualified workers. To sum up, even though individuals who have worked fewer years for a particular company might be less trustworthy, they should be equally promoted as they have up-to-date knowledge and skill sets. Besides that, this will encourage them to apply their abilities to the fullest, thus contributing to the company’s prosperity. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The academic curriculum in the university requires it to be relevant to one’s chosen field. It is the opinion of others that some schools should focus on learning other subjects together with the main ones while others oppose it. In this essay, I will discuss both standpoints and briefly state my side with regard to this proposition. First of all, going to school means a person’s role is to learn and be knowledgeable. Being exposed to and involved not only in main subjects but also in other alternative topics may improve their mental, social and practical skills, which are important for work qualifications. For example, incorporating general psychology will definitely aid people to be emphatic and be trained to adapt to coworkers. Moreover, an introduction to stocks and tax will improve an individual’s skill of saving and investing their money. On the other hand, attending the school’s time and attention to preparing students for qualification will support them in the bits and pieces of the work they will be choosing in the future. It gives them more opportunities to try and experience the real side of their job. Including lessons related to their occupation will prepare them for doing work tasks and taking their roles appropriately and accurately. For example, including numerous mathematical equations and logical analysis will help a student to be an engineer or be trained in hospitals if they would like to be a nurse or medical practitioner. To sum up, it will have affectations on an individual’s life. Personally speaking, I support the viewpoint of having minor courses to expand a person’s knowledge and build more possibilities that may add to their experiences before entering the real world.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The academic curriculum in the university requires it to be relevant to one’s chosen field. It is the opinion of others that some schools should focus on learning other subjects together with the main ones while others oppose it. In this essay, I will discuss both standpoints and briefly state my side with regard to this proposition. First of all, going to school means a person’s role is to learn and be knowledgeable. Being exposed to and involved not only in main subjects but also in other alternative topics may improve their mental, social and practical skills, which are important for work qualifications. For example, incorporating general psychology will definitely aid people to be emphatic and be trained to adapt to coworkers. Moreover, an introduction to stocks and tax will improve an individual’s skill of saving and investing their money. On the other hand, attending the school’s time and attention to preparing students for qualification will support them in the bits and pieces of the work they will be choosing in the future. It gives them more opportunities to try and experience the real side of their job. Including lessons related to their occupation will prepare them for doing work tasks and taking their roles appropriately and accurately. For example, including numerous mathematical equations and logical analysis will help a student to be an engineer or be trained in hospitals if they would like to be a nurse or medical practitioner. To sum up, it will have affectations on an individual’s life. Personally speaking, I support the viewpoint of having minor courses to expand a person’s knowledge and build more possibilities that may add to their experiences before entering the real world. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The academic curriculum in the university requires it to be relevant to one’s chosen field. It is the opinion of others that some schools should focus on learning other subjects together with the main ones while others oppose it. In this essay, I will discuss both standpoints and briefly state my side with regard to this proposition. First of all, going to school means a person’s role is to learn and be knowledgeable. Being exposed to and involved not only in main subjects but also in other alternative topics may improve their mental, social and practical skills, which are important for work qualifications. For example, incorporating general psychology will definitely aid people to be emphatic and be trained to adapt to coworkers. Moreover, an introduction to stocks and tax will improve an individual’s skill of saving and investing their money. On the other hand, attending the school’s time and attention to preparing students for qualification will support them in the bits and pieces of the work they will be choosing in the future. It gives them more opportunities to try and experience the real side of their job. Including lessons related to their occupation will prepare them for doing work tasks and taking their roles appropriately and accurately. For example, including numerous mathematical equations and logical analysis will help a student to be an engineer or be trained in hospitals if they would like to be a nurse or medical practitioner. To sum up, it will have affectations on an individual’s life. Personally speaking, I support the viewpoint of having minor courses to expand a person’s knowledge and build more possibilities that may add to their experiences before entering the real world.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The academic curriculum in the university requires it to be relevant to one’s chosen field. It is the opinion of others that some schools should focus on learning other subjects together with the main ones while others oppose it. In this essay, I will discuss both standpoints and briefly state my side with regard to this proposition. First of all, going to school means a person’s role is to learn and be knowledgeable. Being exposed to and involved not only in main subjects but also in other alternative topics may improve their mental, social and practical skills, which are important for work qualifications. For example, incorporating general psychology will definitely aid people to be emphatic and be trained to adapt to coworkers. Moreover, an introduction to stocks and tax will improve an individual’s skill of saving and investing their money. On the other hand, attending the school’s time and attention to preparing students for qualification will support them in the bits and pieces of the work they will be choosing in the future. It gives them more opportunities to try and experience the real side of their job. Including lessons related to their occupation will prepare them for doing work tasks and taking their roles appropriately and accurately. For example, including numerous mathematical equations and logical analysis will help a student to be an engineer or be trained in hospitals if they would like to be a nurse or medical practitioner. To sum up, it will have affectations on an individual’s life. Personally speaking, I support the viewpoint of having minor courses to expand a person’s knowledge and build more possibilities that may add to their experiences before entering the real world. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The academic curriculum in the university requires it to be relevant to one’s chosen field. It is the opinion of others that some schools should focus on learning other subjects together with the main ones while others oppose it. In this essay, I will discuss both standpoints and briefly state my side with regard to this proposition. First of all, going to school means a person’s role is to learn and be knowledgeable. Being exposed to and involved not only in main subjects but also in other alternative topics may improve their mental, social and practical skills, which are important for work qualifications. For example, incorporating general psychology will definitely aid people to be emphatic and be trained to adapt to coworkers. Moreover, an introduction to stocks and tax will improve an individual’s skill of saving and investing their money. On the other hand, attending the school’s time and attention to preparing students for qualification will support them in the bits and pieces of the work they will be choosing in the future. It gives them more opportunities to try and experience the real side of their job. Including lessons related to their occupation will prepare them for doing work tasks and taking their roles appropriately and accurately. For example, including numerous mathematical equations and logical analysis will help a student to be an engineer or be trained in hospitals if they would like to be a nurse or medical practitioner. To sum up, it will have affectations on an individual’s life. Personally speaking, I support the viewpoint of having minor courses to expand a person’s knowledge and build more possibilities that may add to their experiences before entering the real world.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The academic curriculum in the university requires it to be relevant to one’s chosen field. It is the opinion of others that some schools should focus on learning other subjects together with the main ones while others oppose it. In this essay, I will discuss both standpoints and briefly state my side with regard to this proposition. First of all, going to school means a person’s role is to learn and be knowledgeable. Being exposed to and involved not only in main subjects but also in other alternative topics may improve their mental, social and practical skills, which are important for work qualifications. For example, incorporating general psychology will definitely aid people to be emphatic and be trained to adapt to coworkers. Moreover, an introduction to stocks and tax will improve an individual’s skill of saving and investing their money. On the other hand, attending the school’s time and attention to preparing students for qualification will support them in the bits and pieces of the work they will be choosing in the future. It gives them more opportunities to try and experience the real side of their job. Including lessons related to their occupation will prepare them for doing work tasks and taking their roles appropriately and accurately. For example, including numerous mathematical equations and logical analysis will help a student to be an engineer or be trained in hospitals if they would like to be a nurse or medical practitioner. To sum up, it will have affectations on an individual’s life. Personally speaking, I support the viewpoint of having minor courses to expand a person’s knowledge and build more possibilities that may add to their experiences before entering the real world. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The academic curriculum in the university requires it to be relevant to one’s chosen field. It is the opinion of others that some schools should focus on learning other subjects together with the main ones while others oppose it. In this essay, I will discuss both standpoints and briefly state my side with regard to this proposition. First of all, going to school means a person’s role is to learn and be knowledgeable. Being exposed to and involved not only in main subjects but also in other alternative topics may improve their mental, social and practical skills, which are important for work qualifications. For example, incorporating general psychology will definitely aid people to be emphatic and be trained to adapt to coworkers. Moreover, an introduction to stocks and tax will improve an individual’s skill of saving and investing their money. On the other hand, attending the school’s time and attention to preparing students for qualification will support them in the bits and pieces of the work they will be choosing in the future. It gives them more opportunities to try and experience the real side of their job. Including lessons related to their occupation will prepare them for doing work tasks and taking their roles appropriately and accurately. For example, including numerous mathematical equations and logical analysis will help a student to be an engineer or be trained in hospitals if they would like to be a nurse or medical practitioner. To sum up, it will have affectations on an individual’s life. Personally speaking, I support the viewpoint of having minor courses to expand a person’s knowledge and build more possibilities that may add to their experiences before entering the real world.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects. Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Anwser: The academic curriculum in the university requires it to be relevant to one’s chosen field. It is the opinion of others that some schools should focus on learning other subjects together with the main ones while others oppose it. In this essay, I will discuss both standpoints and briefly state my side with regard to this proposition. First of all, going to school means a person’s role is to learn and be knowledgeable. Being exposed to and involved not only in main subjects but also in other alternative topics may improve their mental, social and practical skills, which are important for work qualifications. For example, incorporating general psychology will definitely aid people to be emphatic and be trained to adapt to coworkers. Moreover, an introduction to stocks and tax will improve an individual’s skill of saving and investing their money. On the other hand, attending the school’s time and attention to preparing students for qualification will support them in the bits and pieces of the work they will be choosing in the future. It gives them more opportunities to try and experience the real side of their job. Including lessons related to their occupation will prepare them for doing work tasks and taking their roles appropriately and accurately. For example, including numerous mathematical equations and logical analysis will help a student to be an engineer or be trained in hospitals if they would like to be a nurse or medical practitioner. To sum up, it will have affectations on an individual’s life. Personally speaking, I support the viewpoint of having minor courses to expand a person’s knowledge and build more possibilities that may add to their experiences before entering the real world. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that man's relationship with animals has changed throughout ages and the use of them in human's life in the modern era is totally different from what it used to be. To what extent do you agree on disagree? Anwser: There is evidence to suggest a dramatic shift in the relationship between human and animal species in the industrialized period, and now the purpose of animals in human life changed in comparison with previous times. I firmly agree with this statement and I will explain my stance in this essay. To begin with, perhaps the major factor contributing to this phenomenon is the advanced accomplishment in human society. In particular, many useful devices were invented by scientists as more scientific breakthroughs were established, such as the usage of gasoline engines or jet engines, in diverse spheres. For example, nowadays, farmers can fertilise by using a controller drone and harvest food crops by driving an agrimotor with an internal combustion engine. While, before the industrialized moment, farmers used buffalos or horses for agricultural purposes. Additionally, people now can commute faster and further by the metro railway system, compared to going by horse-drawn carriage in the previous. Furthermore, with high living standards, people pay more attention to their health and this results in a vegetarian phenomenon in the world leading to more citizens now feeling better after a period of a meat-free diet. In contrast, many people consider meat as an indispensable source in almost all meals, and they usually prefer eating wildlife animal meats in earlier times. Besides, many animal species are now protected by law, and hunting them is illegal. Lastly, but more importantly, a large number of species now have become domesticated and plenty of them have become human companions. Consequently, the emerging trend of fostering pets, such as dogs or cats, become popular in the human community, and the elite class usually loves owning a wildlife giant cat because this rare wildlife will express their social status and financial ability. To conclude, the purpose and the relationship of animals for humans changed drastically through the industrialized moment, as humans used machines rather than animals and moved to a vegetarian diet.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that man's relationship with animals has changed throughout ages and the use of them in human's life in the modern era is totally different from what it used to be. To what extent do you agree on disagree? Anwser: There is evidence to suggest a dramatic shift in the relationship between human and animal species in the industrialized period, and now the purpose of animals in human life changed in comparison with previous times. I firmly agree with this statement and I will explain my stance in this essay. To begin with, perhaps the major factor contributing to this phenomenon is the advanced accomplishment in human society. In particular, many useful devices were invented by scientists as more scientific breakthroughs were established, such as the usage of gasoline engines or jet engines, in diverse spheres. For example, nowadays, farmers can fertilise by using a controller drone and harvest food crops by driving an agrimotor with an internal combustion engine. While, before the industrialized moment, farmers used buffalos or horses for agricultural purposes. Additionally, people now can commute faster and further by the metro railway system, compared to going by horse-drawn carriage in the previous. Furthermore, with high living standards, people pay more attention to their health and this results in a vegetarian phenomenon in the world leading to more citizens now feeling better after a period of a meat-free diet. In contrast, many people consider meat as an indispensable source in almost all meals, and they usually prefer eating wildlife animal meats in earlier times. Besides, many animal species are now protected by law, and hunting them is illegal. Lastly, but more importantly, a large number of species now have become domesticated and plenty of them have become human companions. Consequently, the emerging trend of fostering pets, such as dogs or cats, become popular in the human community, and the elite class usually loves owning a wildlife giant cat because this rare wildlife will express their social status and financial ability. To conclude, the purpose and the relationship of animals for humans changed drastically through the industrialized moment, as humans used machines rather than animals and moved to a vegetarian diet. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that man's relationship with animals has changed throughout ages and the use of them in human's life in the modern era is totally different from what it used to be. To what extent do you agree on disagree? Anwser: There is evidence to suggest a dramatic shift in the relationship between human and animal species in the industrialized period, and now the purpose of animals in human life changed in comparison with previous times. I firmly agree with this statement and I will explain my stance in this essay. To begin with, perhaps the major factor contributing to this phenomenon is the advanced accomplishment in human society. In particular, many useful devices were invented by scientists as more scientific breakthroughs were established, such as the usage of gasoline engines or jet engines, in diverse spheres. For example, nowadays, farmers can fertilise by using a controller drone and harvest food crops by driving an agrimotor with an internal combustion engine. While, before the industrialized moment, farmers used buffalos or horses for agricultural purposes. Additionally, people now can commute faster and further by the metro railway system, compared to going by horse-drawn carriage in the previous. Furthermore, with high living standards, people pay more attention to their health and this results in a vegetarian phenomenon in the world leading to more citizens now feeling better after a period of a meat-free diet. In contrast, many people consider meat as an indispensable source in almost all meals, and they usually prefer eating wildlife animal meats in earlier times. Besides, many animal species are now protected by law, and hunting them is illegal. Lastly, but more importantly, a large number of species now have become domesticated and plenty of them have become human companions. Consequently, the emerging trend of fostering pets, such as dogs or cats, become popular in the human community, and the elite class usually loves owning a wildlife giant cat because this rare wildlife will express their social status and financial ability. To conclude, the purpose and the relationship of animals for humans changed drastically through the industrialized moment, as humans used machines rather than animals and moved to a vegetarian diet.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that man's relationship with animals has changed throughout ages and the use of them in human's life in the modern era is totally different from what it used to be. To what extent do you agree on disagree? Anwser: There is evidence to suggest a dramatic shift in the relationship between human and animal species in the industrialized period, and now the purpose of animals in human life changed in comparison with previous times. I firmly agree with this statement and I will explain my stance in this essay. To begin with, perhaps the major factor contributing to this phenomenon is the advanced accomplishment in human society. In particular, many useful devices were invented by scientists as more scientific breakthroughs were established, such as the usage of gasoline engines or jet engines, in diverse spheres. For example, nowadays, farmers can fertilise by using a controller drone and harvest food crops by driving an agrimotor with an internal combustion engine. While, before the industrialized moment, farmers used buffalos or horses for agricultural purposes. Additionally, people now can commute faster and further by the metro railway system, compared to going by horse-drawn carriage in the previous. Furthermore, with high living standards, people pay more attention to their health and this results in a vegetarian phenomenon in the world leading to more citizens now feeling better after a period of a meat-free diet. In contrast, many people consider meat as an indispensable source in almost all meals, and they usually prefer eating wildlife animal meats in earlier times. Besides, many animal species are now protected by law, and hunting them is illegal. Lastly, but more importantly, a large number of species now have become domesticated and plenty of them have become human companions. Consequently, the emerging trend of fostering pets, such as dogs or cats, become popular in the human community, and the elite class usually loves owning a wildlife giant cat because this rare wildlife will express their social status and financial ability. To conclude, the purpose and the relationship of animals for humans changed drastically through the industrialized moment, as humans used machines rather than animals and moved to a vegetarian diet. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that man's relationship with animals has changed throughout ages and the use of them in human's life in the modern era is totally different from what it used to be. To what extent do you agree on disagree? Anwser: There is evidence to suggest a dramatic shift in the relationship between human and animal species in the industrialized period, and now the purpose of animals in human life changed in comparison with previous times. I firmly agree with this statement and I will explain my stance in this essay. To begin with, perhaps the major factor contributing to this phenomenon is the advanced accomplishment in human society. In particular, many useful devices were invented by scientists as more scientific breakthroughs were established, such as the usage of gasoline engines or jet engines, in diverse spheres. For example, nowadays, farmers can fertilise by using a controller drone and harvest food crops by driving an agrimotor with an internal combustion engine. While, before the industrialized moment, farmers used buffalos or horses for agricultural purposes. Additionally, people now can commute faster and further by the metro railway system, compared to going by horse-drawn carriage in the previous. Furthermore, with high living standards, people pay more attention to their health and this results in a vegetarian phenomenon in the world leading to more citizens now feeling better after a period of a meat-free diet. In contrast, many people consider meat as an indispensable source in almost all meals, and they usually prefer eating wildlife animal meats in earlier times. Besides, many animal species are now protected by law, and hunting them is illegal. Lastly, but more importantly, a large number of species now have become domesticated and plenty of them have become human companions. Consequently, the emerging trend of fostering pets, such as dogs or cats, become popular in the human community, and the elite class usually loves owning a wildlife giant cat because this rare wildlife will express their social status and financial ability. To conclude, the purpose and the relationship of animals for humans changed drastically through the industrialized moment, as humans used machines rather than animals and moved to a vegetarian diet.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that man's relationship with animals has changed throughout ages and the use of them in human's life in the modern era is totally different from what it used to be. To what extent do you agree on disagree? Anwser: There is evidence to suggest a dramatic shift in the relationship between human and animal species in the industrialized period, and now the purpose of animals in human life changed in comparison with previous times. I firmly agree with this statement and I will explain my stance in this essay. To begin with, perhaps the major factor contributing to this phenomenon is the advanced accomplishment in human society. In particular, many useful devices were invented by scientists as more scientific breakthroughs were established, such as the usage of gasoline engines or jet engines, in diverse spheres. For example, nowadays, farmers can fertilise by using a controller drone and harvest food crops by driving an agrimotor with an internal combustion engine. While, before the industrialized moment, farmers used buffalos or horses for agricultural purposes. Additionally, people now can commute faster and further by the metro railway system, compared to going by horse-drawn carriage in the previous. Furthermore, with high living standards, people pay more attention to their health and this results in a vegetarian phenomenon in the world leading to more citizens now feeling better after a period of a meat-free diet. In contrast, many people consider meat as an indispensable source in almost all meals, and they usually prefer eating wildlife animal meats in earlier times. Besides, many animal species are now protected by law, and hunting them is illegal. Lastly, but more importantly, a large number of species now have become domesticated and plenty of them have become human companions. Consequently, the emerging trend of fostering pets, such as dogs or cats, become popular in the human community, and the elite class usually loves owning a wildlife giant cat because this rare wildlife will express their social status and financial ability. To conclude, the purpose and the relationship of animals for humans changed drastically through the industrialized moment, as humans used machines rather than animals and moved to a vegetarian diet. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that man's relationship with animals has changed throughout ages and the use of them in human's life in the modern era is totally different from what it used to be. To what extent do you agree on disagree? Anwser: There is evidence to suggest a dramatic shift in the relationship between human and animal species in the industrialized period, and now the purpose of animals in human life changed in comparison with previous times. I firmly agree with this statement and I will explain my stance in this essay. To begin with, perhaps the major factor contributing to this phenomenon is the advanced accomplishment in human society. In particular, many useful devices were invented by scientists as more scientific breakthroughs were established, such as the usage of gasoline engines or jet engines, in diverse spheres. For example, nowadays, farmers can fertilise by using a controller drone and harvest food crops by driving an agrimotor with an internal combustion engine. While, before the industrialized moment, farmers used buffalos or horses for agricultural purposes. Additionally, people now can commute faster and further by the metro railway system, compared to going by horse-drawn carriage in the previous. Furthermore, with high living standards, people pay more attention to their health and this results in a vegetarian phenomenon in the world leading to more citizens now feeling better after a period of a meat-free diet. In contrast, many people consider meat as an indispensable source in almost all meals, and they usually prefer eating wildlife animal meats in earlier times. Besides, many animal species are now protected by law, and hunting them is illegal. Lastly, but more importantly, a large number of species now have become domesticated and plenty of them have become human companions. Consequently, the emerging trend of fostering pets, such as dogs or cats, become popular in the human community, and the elite class usually loves owning a wildlife giant cat because this rare wildlife will express their social status and financial ability. To conclude, the purpose and the relationship of animals for humans changed drastically through the industrialized moment, as humans used machines rather than animals and moved to a vegetarian diet.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that man's relationship with animals has changed throughout ages and the use of them in human's life in the modern era is totally different from what it used to be. To what extent do you agree on disagree? Anwser: There is evidence to suggest a dramatic shift in the relationship between human and animal species in the industrialized period, and now the purpose of animals in human life changed in comparison with previous times. I firmly agree with this statement and I will explain my stance in this essay. To begin with, perhaps the major factor contributing to this phenomenon is the advanced accomplishment in human society. In particular, many useful devices were invented by scientists as more scientific breakthroughs were established, such as the usage of gasoline engines or jet engines, in diverse spheres. For example, nowadays, farmers can fertilise by using a controller drone and harvest food crops by driving an agrimotor with an internal combustion engine. While, before the industrialized moment, farmers used buffalos or horses for agricultural purposes. Additionally, people now can commute faster and further by the metro railway system, compared to going by horse-drawn carriage in the previous. Furthermore, with high living standards, people pay more attention to their health and this results in a vegetarian phenomenon in the world leading to more citizens now feeling better after a period of a meat-free diet. In contrast, many people consider meat as an indispensable source in almost all meals, and they usually prefer eating wildlife animal meats in earlier times. Besides, many animal species are now protected by law, and hunting them is illegal. Lastly, but more importantly, a large number of species now have become domesticated and plenty of them have become human companions. Consequently, the emerging trend of fostering pets, such as dogs or cats, become popular in the human community, and the elite class usually loves owning a wildlife giant cat because this rare wildlife will express their social status and financial ability. To conclude, the purpose and the relationship of animals for humans changed drastically through the industrialized moment, as humans used machines rather than animals and moved to a vegetarian diet. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and societies To what extent do you agree? Anwser: It is often argued that social media is impacting our daily lives both on an individual and societal level. However, it is hard to deny that people are using it for various online negative activities. So, I agree with the given statement and I have ample points to prove my stand. To begin with, one of the biggest issues that can be seen easily is that individuals like to spend their time chatting with friends online or watching movies, hence they have no time for family. Back in the day, families used to come together to spend some quality time, but nowadays, everybody likes to chat or video call on WhatsApp rather than meet offline. For example, a survey conducted by BBC shows that up to seventy per cent of youngster like to spend their time online, which is a matter of concern. Moreover, it is hard to ignore when it comes to bullying and online stalking. People who spend most of their time on social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are more likely to get stalked by online predators. Moving further, it also impacts their social life, as it becomes hard for them to make friends in school or at work. For instance, a report submitted by Times Magazine shared that teenagers are the ones who get the worst out of it as it becomes hard for them when it comes to social networking. To conclude, I agree that people of all ages like to escape the real world, where they can forget about their stressful life, but spending too much time on the phone and especially chatting with random folks is not positive either.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and societies To what extent do you agree? Anwser: It is often argued that social media is impacting our daily lives both on an individual and societal level. However, it is hard to deny that people are using it for various online negative activities. So, I agree with the given statement and I have ample points to prove my stand. To begin with, one of the biggest issues that can be seen easily is that individuals like to spend their time chatting with friends online or watching movies, hence they have no time for family. Back in the day, families used to come together to spend some quality time, but nowadays, everybody likes to chat or video call on WhatsApp rather than meet offline. For example, a survey conducted by BBC shows that up to seventy per cent of youngster like to spend their time online, which is a matter of concern. Moreover, it is hard to ignore when it comes to bullying and online stalking. People who spend most of their time on social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are more likely to get stalked by online predators. Moving further, it also impacts their social life, as it becomes hard for them to make friends in school or at work. For instance, a report submitted by Times Magazine shared that teenagers are the ones who get the worst out of it as it becomes hard for them when it comes to social networking. To conclude, I agree that people of all ages like to escape the real world, where they can forget about their stressful life, but spending too much time on the phone and especially chatting with random folks is not positive either. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and societies To what extent do you agree? Anwser: It is often argued that social media is impacting our daily lives both on an individual and societal level. However, it is hard to deny that people are using it for various online negative activities. So, I agree with the given statement and I have ample points to prove my stand. To begin with, one of the biggest issues that can be seen easily is that individuals like to spend their time chatting with friends online or watching movies, hence they have no time for family. Back in the day, families used to come together to spend some quality time, but nowadays, everybody likes to chat or video call on WhatsApp rather than meet offline. For example, a survey conducted by BBC shows that up to seventy per cent of youngster like to spend their time online, which is a matter of concern. Moreover, it is hard to ignore when it comes to bullying and online stalking. People who spend most of their time on social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are more likely to get stalked by online predators. Moving further, it also impacts their social life, as it becomes hard for them to make friends in school or at work. For instance, a report submitted by Times Magazine shared that teenagers are the ones who get the worst out of it as it becomes hard for them when it comes to social networking. To conclude, I agree that people of all ages like to escape the real world, where they can forget about their stressful life, but spending too much time on the phone and especially chatting with random folks is not positive either.

Your lexical resource score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and societies To what extent do you agree? Anwser: It is often argued that social media is impacting our daily lives both on an individual and societal level. However, it is hard to deny that people are using it for various online negative activities. So, I agree with the given statement and I have ample points to prove my stand. To begin with, one of the biggest issues that can be seen easily is that individuals like to spend their time chatting with friends online or watching movies, hence they have no time for family. Back in the day, families used to come together to spend some quality time, but nowadays, everybody likes to chat or video call on WhatsApp rather than meet offline. For example, a survey conducted by BBC shows that up to seventy per cent of youngster like to spend their time online, which is a matter of concern. Moreover, it is hard to ignore when it comes to bullying and online stalking. People who spend most of their time on social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are more likely to get stalked by online predators. Moving further, it also impacts their social life, as it becomes hard for them to make friends in school or at work. For instance, a report submitted by Times Magazine shared that teenagers are the ones who get the worst out of it as it becomes hard for them when it comes to social networking. To conclude, I agree that people of all ages like to escape the real world, where they can forget about their stressful life, but spending too much time on the phone and especially chatting with random folks is not positive either. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and societies To what extent do you agree? Anwser: It is often argued that social media is impacting our daily lives both on an individual and societal level. However, it is hard to deny that people are using it for various online negative activities. So, I agree with the given statement and I have ample points to prove my stand. To begin with, one of the biggest issues that can be seen easily is that individuals like to spend their time chatting with friends online or watching movies, hence they have no time for family. Back in the day, families used to come together to spend some quality time, but nowadays, everybody likes to chat or video call on WhatsApp rather than meet offline. For example, a survey conducted by BBC shows that up to seventy per cent of youngster like to spend their time online, which is a matter of concern. Moreover, it is hard to ignore when it comes to bullying and online stalking. People who spend most of their time on social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are more likely to get stalked by online predators. Moving further, it also impacts their social life, as it becomes hard for them to make friends in school or at work. For instance, a report submitted by Times Magazine shared that teenagers are the ones who get the worst out of it as it becomes hard for them when it comes to social networking. To conclude, I agree that people of all ages like to escape the real world, where they can forget about their stressful life, but spending too much time on the phone and especially chatting with random folks is not positive either.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and societies To what extent do you agree? Anwser: It is often argued that social media is impacting our daily lives both on an individual and societal level. However, it is hard to deny that people are using it for various online negative activities. So, I agree with the given statement and I have ample points to prove my stand. To begin with, one of the biggest issues that can be seen easily is that individuals like to spend their time chatting with friends online or watching movies, hence they have no time for family. Back in the day, families used to come together to spend some quality time, but nowadays, everybody likes to chat or video call on WhatsApp rather than meet offline. For example, a survey conducted by BBC shows that up to seventy per cent of youngster like to spend their time online, which is a matter of concern. Moreover, it is hard to ignore when it comes to bullying and online stalking. People who spend most of their time on social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are more likely to get stalked by online predators. Moving further, it also impacts their social life, as it becomes hard for them to make friends in school or at work. For instance, a report submitted by Times Magazine shared that teenagers are the ones who get the worst out of it as it becomes hard for them when it comes to social networking. To conclude, I agree that people of all ages like to escape the real world, where they can forget about their stressful life, but spending too much time on the phone and especially chatting with random folks is not positive either. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and societies To what extent do you agree? Anwser: It is often argued that social media is impacting our daily lives both on an individual and societal level. However, it is hard to deny that people are using it for various online negative activities. So, I agree with the given statement and I have ample points to prove my stand. To begin with, one of the biggest issues that can be seen easily is that individuals like to spend their time chatting with friends online or watching movies, hence they have no time for family. Back in the day, families used to come together to spend some quality time, but nowadays, everybody likes to chat or video call on WhatsApp rather than meet offline. For example, a survey conducted by BBC shows that up to seventy per cent of youngster like to spend their time online, which is a matter of concern. Moreover, it is hard to ignore when it comes to bullying and online stalking. People who spend most of their time on social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are more likely to get stalked by online predators. Moving further, it also impacts their social life, as it becomes hard for them to make friends in school or at work. For instance, a report submitted by Times Magazine shared that teenagers are the ones who get the worst out of it as it becomes hard for them when it comes to social networking. To conclude, I agree that people of all ages like to escape the real world, where they can forget about their stressful life, but spending too much time on the phone and especially chatting with random folks is not positive either.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and societies To what extent do you agree? Anwser: It is often argued that social media is impacting our daily lives both on an individual and societal level. However, it is hard to deny that people are using it for various online negative activities. So, I agree with the given statement and I have ample points to prove my stand. To begin with, one of the biggest issues that can be seen easily is that individuals like to spend their time chatting with friends online or watching movies, hence they have no time for family. Back in the day, families used to come together to spend some quality time, but nowadays, everybody likes to chat or video call on WhatsApp rather than meet offline. For example, a survey conducted by BBC shows that up to seventy per cent of youngster like to spend their time online, which is a matter of concern. Moreover, it is hard to ignore when it comes to bullying and online stalking. People who spend most of their time on social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter are more likely to get stalked by online predators. Moving further, it also impacts their social life, as it becomes hard for them to make friends in school or at work. For instance, a report submitted by Times Magazine shared that teenagers are the ones who get the worst out of it as it becomes hard for them when it comes to social networking. To conclude, I agree that people of all ages like to escape the real world, where they can forget about their stressful life, but spending too much time on the phone and especially chatting with random folks is not positive either. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Government spending on restroration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend money in housing and road development . Do you agree or disagree with this. Anwser: In the modern era, society raises questions regarding spending capital. Some People believe that spending funds on old buildings should not be a focus, as authorities should be more concerned about constructing new roads and houses. In my view, I totally agree with this idea and support my essay with relevant examples. To commence with, the Government have to focus more on the development of the new buildings because they are doing it from people's taxes so it should be for their comfort. For example, In Pakistan, there are more requirements for making highways so that individuals easily go anywhere. In other words, it saves their time. Secondly, we realise more importance of developed roads when something happens to us. Like in emergencies, when the ambulance was not reached at a specific time and somebody died just because of undeveloped highways. Finally, I believe, a place that needs more homes for poor individuals and spending capital on the historical old building seems to be a waste of funds. on the other hand, it is a common fact that old building shows our old architecture and culture. For example, In India, there are a lot of forts, which should be maintained by authorities as they relate to our ancestors and we firmly believe in attachments. Moreover, it also encourages tourism because many tourists only come to see the oldest buildings. In summary, I would conclude that where restoration of old things maintains our culture and attracts tourism. I personally believe the first government should spend their resources on society's welfare by making goods homes and motorways.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Government spending on restroration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend money in housing and road development . Do you agree or disagree with this. Anwser: In the modern era, society raises questions regarding spending capital. Some People believe that spending funds on old buildings should not be a focus, as authorities should be more concerned about constructing new roads and houses. In my view, I totally agree with this idea and support my essay with relevant examples. To commence with, the Government have to focus more on the development of the new buildings because they are doing it from people's taxes so it should be for their comfort. For example, In Pakistan, there are more requirements for making highways so that individuals easily go anywhere. In other words, it saves their time. Secondly, we realise more importance of developed roads when something happens to us. Like in emergencies, when the ambulance was not reached at a specific time and somebody died just because of undeveloped highways. Finally, I believe, a place that needs more homes for poor individuals and spending capital on the historical old building seems to be a waste of funds. on the other hand, it is a common fact that old building shows our old architecture and culture. For example, In India, there are a lot of forts, which should be maintained by authorities as they relate to our ancestors and we firmly believe in attachments. Moreover, it also encourages tourism because many tourists only come to see the oldest buildings. In summary, I would conclude that where restoration of old things maintains our culture and attracts tourism. I personally believe the first government should spend their resources on society's welfare by making goods homes and motorways. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Government spending on restroration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend money in housing and road development . Do you agree or disagree with this. Anwser: In the modern era, society raises questions regarding spending capital. Some People believe that spending funds on old buildings should not be a focus, as authorities should be more concerned about constructing new roads and houses. In my view, I totally agree with this idea and support my essay with relevant examples. To commence with, the Government have to focus more on the development of the new buildings because they are doing it from people's taxes so it should be for their comfort. For example, In Pakistan, there are more requirements for making highways so that individuals easily go anywhere. In other words, it saves their time. Secondly, we realise more importance of developed roads when something happens to us. Like in emergencies, when the ambulance was not reached at a specific time and somebody died just because of undeveloped highways. Finally, I believe, a place that needs more homes for poor individuals and spending capital on the historical old building seems to be a waste of funds. on the other hand, it is a common fact that old building shows our old architecture and culture. For example, In India, there are a lot of forts, which should be maintained by authorities as they relate to our ancestors and we firmly believe in attachments. Moreover, it also encourages tourism because many tourists only come to see the oldest buildings. In summary, I would conclude that where restoration of old things maintains our culture and attracts tourism. I personally believe the first government should spend their resources on society's welfare by making goods homes and motorways.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Government spending on restroration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend money in housing and road development . Do you agree or disagree with this. Anwser: In the modern era, society raises questions regarding spending capital. Some People believe that spending funds on old buildings should not be a focus, as authorities should be more concerned about constructing new roads and houses. In my view, I totally agree with this idea and support my essay with relevant examples. To commence with, the Government have to focus more on the development of the new buildings because they are doing it from people's taxes so it should be for their comfort. For example, In Pakistan, there are more requirements for making highways so that individuals easily go anywhere. In other words, it saves their time. Secondly, we realise more importance of developed roads when something happens to us. Like in emergencies, when the ambulance was not reached at a specific time and somebody died just because of undeveloped highways. Finally, I believe, a place that needs more homes for poor individuals and spending capital on the historical old building seems to be a waste of funds. on the other hand, it is a common fact that old building shows our old architecture and culture. For example, In India, there are a lot of forts, which should be maintained by authorities as they relate to our ancestors and we firmly believe in attachments. Moreover, it also encourages tourism because many tourists only come to see the oldest buildings. In summary, I would conclude that where restoration of old things maintains our culture and attracts tourism. I personally believe the first government should spend their resources on society's welfare by making goods homes and motorways. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Government spending on restroration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend money in housing and road development . Do you agree or disagree with this. Anwser: In the modern era, society raises questions regarding spending capital. Some People believe that spending funds on old buildings should not be a focus, as authorities should be more concerned about constructing new roads and houses. In my view, I totally agree with this idea and support my essay with relevant examples. To commence with, the Government have to focus more on the development of the new buildings because they are doing it from people's taxes so it should be for their comfort. For example, In Pakistan, there are more requirements for making highways so that individuals easily go anywhere. In other words, it saves their time. Secondly, we realise more importance of developed roads when something happens to us. Like in emergencies, when the ambulance was not reached at a specific time and somebody died just because of undeveloped highways. Finally, I believe, a place that needs more homes for poor individuals and spending capital on the historical old building seems to be a waste of funds. on the other hand, it is a common fact that old building shows our old architecture and culture. For example, In India, there are a lot of forts, which should be maintained by authorities as they relate to our ancestors and we firmly believe in attachments. Moreover, it also encourages tourism because many tourists only come to see the oldest buildings. In summary, I would conclude that where restoration of old things maintains our culture and attracts tourism. I personally believe the first government should spend their resources on society's welfare by making goods homes and motorways.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Government spending on restroration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend money in housing and road development . Do you agree or disagree with this. Anwser: In the modern era, society raises questions regarding spending capital. Some People believe that spending funds on old buildings should not be a focus, as authorities should be more concerned about constructing new roads and houses. In my view, I totally agree with this idea and support my essay with relevant examples. To commence with, the Government have to focus more on the development of the new buildings because they are doing it from people's taxes so it should be for their comfort. For example, In Pakistan, there are more requirements for making highways so that individuals easily go anywhere. In other words, it saves their time. Secondly, we realise more importance of developed roads when something happens to us. Like in emergencies, when the ambulance was not reached at a specific time and somebody died just because of undeveloped highways. Finally, I believe, a place that needs more homes for poor individuals and spending capital on the historical old building seems to be a waste of funds. on the other hand, it is a common fact that old building shows our old architecture and culture. For example, In India, there are a lot of forts, which should be maintained by authorities as they relate to our ancestors and we firmly believe in attachments. Moreover, it also encourages tourism because many tourists only come to see the oldest buildings. In summary, I would conclude that where restoration of old things maintains our culture and attracts tourism. I personally believe the first government should spend their resources on society's welfare by making goods homes and motorways. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Government spending on restroration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend money in housing and road development . Do you agree or disagree with this. Anwser: In the modern era, society raises questions regarding spending capital. Some People believe that spending funds on old buildings should not be a focus, as authorities should be more concerned about constructing new roads and houses. In my view, I totally agree with this idea and support my essay with relevant examples. To commence with, the Government have to focus more on the development of the new buildings because they are doing it from people's taxes so it should be for their comfort. For example, In Pakistan, there are more requirements for making highways so that individuals easily go anywhere. In other words, it saves their time. Secondly, we realise more importance of developed roads when something happens to us. Like in emergencies, when the ambulance was not reached at a specific time and somebody died just because of undeveloped highways. Finally, I believe, a place that needs more homes for poor individuals and spending capital on the historical old building seems to be a waste of funds. on the other hand, it is a common fact that old building shows our old architecture and culture. For example, In India, there are a lot of forts, which should be maintained by authorities as they relate to our ancestors and we firmly believe in attachments. Moreover, it also encourages tourism because many tourists only come to see the oldest buildings. In summary, I would conclude that where restoration of old things maintains our culture and attracts tourism. I personally believe the first government should spend their resources on society's welfare by making goods homes and motorways.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Government spending on restroration of old buildings in cities should be stopped. Instead they should spend money in housing and road development . Do you agree or disagree with this. Anwser: In the modern era, society raises questions regarding spending capital. Some People believe that spending funds on old buildings should not be a focus, as authorities should be more concerned about constructing new roads and houses. In my view, I totally agree with this idea and support my essay with relevant examples. To commence with, the Government have to focus more on the development of the new buildings because they are doing it from people's taxes so it should be for their comfort. For example, In Pakistan, there are more requirements for making highways so that individuals easily go anywhere. In other words, it saves their time. Secondly, we realise more importance of developed roads when something happens to us. Like in emergencies, when the ambulance was not reached at a specific time and somebody died just because of undeveloped highways. Finally, I believe, a place that needs more homes for poor individuals and spending capital on the historical old building seems to be a waste of funds. on the other hand, it is a common fact that old building shows our old architecture and culture. For example, In India, there are a lot of forts, which should be maintained by authorities as they relate to our ancestors and we firmly believe in attachments. Moreover, it also encourages tourism because many tourists only come to see the oldest buildings. In summary, I would conclude that where restoration of old things maintains our culture and attracts tourism. I personally believe the first government should spend their resources on society's welfare by making goods homes and motorways. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, there have been schemes to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. Do you feel that this is likely to have beneficial effects on education? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. Anwser: Nowadays, it is becoming common for some countries to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. However, I disagree that this scheme will bring positive impacts for two reasons. The main reason is they do not have sufficient experience in handling pupils. Overqualified people tend to have jobs in international companies. It makes them interact more with adults. For instance, the managers' job description is related to discussing business with coworkers. By retraining old professional people to become school teachers, students can not be handled properly. As a result, the class can not be running well. Being a teacher requires experience that relates to students. Not every overqualified person can be a teacher. The next reason why making the scheme for overqualified people teaching has a negative effect is they have different major backgrounds. The older professional people come from different majors. Moreover, they never learn about teaching youngsters in their latest major. It will make them face many difficulties, such as not being able to grab the pupils' attention. For illustration, an overqualified person can not use the proper teaching aids to teach about algebra. Consequently, students can not understand the material fully. It will affect the student's academic success. To sum up, this essay examined the potential drawbacks of encouraging overqualified people to retrain as school teachers, which are difficult to handle youngsters and the possibility can not teach the students well. Therefore, I remained firmly convinced that putting older professional people can only have a negative influence on education.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, there have been schemes to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. Do you feel that this is likely to have beneficial effects on education? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. Anwser: Nowadays, it is becoming common for some countries to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. However, I disagree that this scheme will bring positive impacts for two reasons. The main reason is they do not have sufficient experience in handling pupils. Overqualified people tend to have jobs in international companies. It makes them interact more with adults. For instance, the managers' job description is related to discussing business with coworkers. By retraining old professional people to become school teachers, students can not be handled properly. As a result, the class can not be running well. Being a teacher requires experience that relates to students. Not every overqualified person can be a teacher. The next reason why making the scheme for overqualified people teaching has a negative effect is they have different major backgrounds. The older professional people come from different majors. Moreover, they never learn about teaching youngsters in their latest major. It will make them face many difficulties, such as not being able to grab the pupils' attention. For illustration, an overqualified person can not use the proper teaching aids to teach about algebra. Consequently, students can not understand the material fully. It will affect the student's academic success. To sum up, this essay examined the potential drawbacks of encouraging overqualified people to retrain as school teachers, which are difficult to handle youngsters and the possibility can not teach the students well. Therefore, I remained firmly convinced that putting older professional people can only have a negative influence on education. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, there have been schemes to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. Do you feel that this is likely to have beneficial effects on education? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. Anwser: Nowadays, it is becoming common for some countries to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. However, I disagree that this scheme will bring positive impacts for two reasons. The main reason is they do not have sufficient experience in handling pupils. Overqualified people tend to have jobs in international companies. It makes them interact more with adults. For instance, the managers' job description is related to discussing business with coworkers. By retraining old professional people to become school teachers, students can not be handled properly. As a result, the class can not be running well. Being a teacher requires experience that relates to students. Not every overqualified person can be a teacher. The next reason why making the scheme for overqualified people teaching has a negative effect is they have different major backgrounds. The older professional people come from different majors. Moreover, they never learn about teaching youngsters in their latest major. It will make them face many difficulties, such as not being able to grab the pupils' attention. For illustration, an overqualified person can not use the proper teaching aids to teach about algebra. Consequently, students can not understand the material fully. It will affect the student's academic success. To sum up, this essay examined the potential drawbacks of encouraging overqualified people to retrain as school teachers, which are difficult to handle youngsters and the possibility can not teach the students well. Therefore, I remained firmly convinced that putting older professional people can only have a negative influence on education.

Your lexical resource score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, there have been schemes to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. Do you feel that this is likely to have beneficial effects on education? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. Anwser: Nowadays, it is becoming common for some countries to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. However, I disagree that this scheme will bring positive impacts for two reasons. The main reason is they do not have sufficient experience in handling pupils. Overqualified people tend to have jobs in international companies. It makes them interact more with adults. For instance, the managers' job description is related to discussing business with coworkers. By retraining old professional people to become school teachers, students can not be handled properly. As a result, the class can not be running well. Being a teacher requires experience that relates to students. Not every overqualified person can be a teacher. The next reason why making the scheme for overqualified people teaching has a negative effect is they have different major backgrounds. The older professional people come from different majors. Moreover, they never learn about teaching youngsters in their latest major. It will make them face many difficulties, such as not being able to grab the pupils' attention. For illustration, an overqualified person can not use the proper teaching aids to teach about algebra. Consequently, students can not understand the material fully. It will affect the student's academic success. To sum up, this essay examined the potential drawbacks of encouraging overqualified people to retrain as school teachers, which are difficult to handle youngsters and the possibility can not teach the students well. Therefore, I remained firmly convinced that putting older professional people can only have a negative influence on education. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, there have been schemes to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. Do you feel that this is likely to have beneficial effects on education? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. Anwser: Nowadays, it is becoming common for some countries to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. However, I disagree that this scheme will bring positive impacts for two reasons. The main reason is they do not have sufficient experience in handling pupils. Overqualified people tend to have jobs in international companies. It makes them interact more with adults. For instance, the managers' job description is related to discussing business with coworkers. By retraining old professional people to become school teachers, students can not be handled properly. As a result, the class can not be running well. Being a teacher requires experience that relates to students. Not every overqualified person can be a teacher. The next reason why making the scheme for overqualified people teaching has a negative effect is they have different major backgrounds. The older professional people come from different majors. Moreover, they never learn about teaching youngsters in their latest major. It will make them face many difficulties, such as not being able to grab the pupils' attention. For illustration, an overqualified person can not use the proper teaching aids to teach about algebra. Consequently, students can not understand the material fully. It will affect the student's academic success. To sum up, this essay examined the potential drawbacks of encouraging overqualified people to retrain as school teachers, which are difficult to handle youngsters and the possibility can not teach the students well. Therefore, I remained firmly convinced that putting older professional people can only have a negative influence on education.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, there have been schemes to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. Do you feel that this is likely to have beneficial effects on education? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. Anwser: Nowadays, it is becoming common for some countries to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. However, I disagree that this scheme will bring positive impacts for two reasons. The main reason is they do not have sufficient experience in handling pupils. Overqualified people tend to have jobs in international companies. It makes them interact more with adults. For instance, the managers' job description is related to discussing business with coworkers. By retraining old professional people to become school teachers, students can not be handled properly. As a result, the class can not be running well. Being a teacher requires experience that relates to students. Not every overqualified person can be a teacher. The next reason why making the scheme for overqualified people teaching has a negative effect is they have different major backgrounds. The older professional people come from different majors. Moreover, they never learn about teaching youngsters in their latest major. It will make them face many difficulties, such as not being able to grab the pupils' attention. For illustration, an overqualified person can not use the proper teaching aids to teach about algebra. Consequently, students can not understand the material fully. It will affect the student's academic success. To sum up, this essay examined the potential drawbacks of encouraging overqualified people to retrain as school teachers, which are difficult to handle youngsters and the possibility can not teach the students well. Therefore, I remained firmly convinced that putting older professional people can only have a negative influence on education. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, there have been schemes to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. Do you feel that this is likely to have beneficial effects on education? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. Anwser: Nowadays, it is becoming common for some countries to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. However, I disagree that this scheme will bring positive impacts for two reasons. The main reason is they do not have sufficient experience in handling pupils. Overqualified people tend to have jobs in international companies. It makes them interact more with adults. For instance, the managers' job description is related to discussing business with coworkers. By retraining old professional people to become school teachers, students can not be handled properly. As a result, the class can not be running well. Being a teacher requires experience that relates to students. Not every overqualified person can be a teacher. The next reason why making the scheme for overqualified people teaching has a negative effect is they have different major backgrounds. The older professional people come from different majors. Moreover, they never learn about teaching youngsters in their latest major. It will make them face many difficulties, such as not being able to grab the pupils' attention. For illustration, an overqualified person can not use the proper teaching aids to teach about algebra. Consequently, students can not understand the material fully. It will affect the student's academic success. To sum up, this essay examined the potential drawbacks of encouraging overqualified people to retrain as school teachers, which are difficult to handle youngsters and the possibility can not teach the students well. Therefore, I remained firmly convinced that putting older professional people can only have a negative influence on education.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: In some countries, there have been schemes to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. Do you feel that this is likely to have beneficial effects on education? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. Anwser: Nowadays, it is becoming common for some countries to encourage older professional people to retrain as school teachers. However, I disagree that this scheme will bring positive impacts for two reasons. The main reason is they do not have sufficient experience in handling pupils. Overqualified people tend to have jobs in international companies. It makes them interact more with adults. For instance, the managers' job description is related to discussing business with coworkers. By retraining old professional people to become school teachers, students can not be handled properly. As a result, the class can not be running well. Being a teacher requires experience that relates to students. Not every overqualified person can be a teacher. The next reason why making the scheme for overqualified people teaching has a negative effect is they have different major backgrounds. The older professional people come from different majors. Moreover, they never learn about teaching youngsters in their latest major. It will make them face many difficulties, such as not being able to grab the pupils' attention. For illustration, an overqualified person can not use the proper teaching aids to teach about algebra. Consequently, students can not understand the material fully. It will affect the student's academic success. To sum up, this essay examined the potential drawbacks of encouraging overqualified people to retrain as school teachers, which are difficult to handle youngsters and the possibility can not teach the students well. Therefore, I remained firmly convinced that putting older professional people can only have a negative influence on education. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Music has always been and continues to be the universal language of mankind. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people believe that throughout history and still today, music remains the shared language of humanity. I partially agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, we live in a globalised era also our technology is developed, we can listen to music anywhere and anytime. Moreover, in the past, music used various things such as treatment, stopping war and assisting to make folks relax. In addition, nowadays, many communities listen to music, and they find solace in that. For example, In South Korea, there is a pop culture called K-pop and a famous singer named BTS who made songs from their experiences and encouraged others so that numerous world individuals listen to their songs and feel comfortable, which leads to peace and relaxation. For this reason, I believe that music has power in people's minds and some music is used for treatment. This phenomenon remains the shared expression of humanity because the majority of communities listen to BTS music, and they want to learn Korean so it is beneficial to South Koreans. On the other hand, some countries use music to control their citizens because they make people loyal so that they dominate their nation permanently. For instance, In North Korea, they make music only for their dictator because if they make various music genres, that dictator will kill them. Furthermore, most of their citizens do not talk about opera or musicals because they have no freedom. Therefore, these kinds of nations do not share a language of humanity, which is a tragic situation. In conclusion, I partially agree with this topic. Today, we can listen to music and communicate with each other using music language. Conversely, some countries cannot listen to any music they must listen to music about their dictators. So, we should try to assist those kinds of nations because we are global citizens, and they deserve to rights listen to various music.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Music has always been and continues to be the universal language of mankind. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people believe that throughout history and still today, music remains the shared language of humanity. I partially agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, we live in a globalised era also our technology is developed, we can listen to music anywhere and anytime. Moreover, in the past, music used various things such as treatment, stopping war and assisting to make folks relax. In addition, nowadays, many communities listen to music, and they find solace in that. For example, In South Korea, there is a pop culture called K-pop and a famous singer named BTS who made songs from their experiences and encouraged others so that numerous world individuals listen to their songs and feel comfortable, which leads to peace and relaxation. For this reason, I believe that music has power in people's minds and some music is used for treatment. This phenomenon remains the shared expression of humanity because the majority of communities listen to BTS music, and they want to learn Korean so it is beneficial to South Koreans. On the other hand, some countries use music to control their citizens because they make people loyal so that they dominate their nation permanently. For instance, In North Korea, they make music only for their dictator because if they make various music genres, that dictator will kill them. Furthermore, most of their citizens do not talk about opera or musicals because they have no freedom. Therefore, these kinds of nations do not share a language of humanity, which is a tragic situation. In conclusion, I partially agree with this topic. Today, we can listen to music and communicate with each other using music language. Conversely, some countries cannot listen to any music they must listen to music about their dictators. So, we should try to assist those kinds of nations because we are global citizens, and they deserve to rights listen to various music. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Music has always been and continues to be the universal language of mankind. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people believe that throughout history and still today, music remains the shared language of humanity. I partially agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, we live in a globalised era also our technology is developed, we can listen to music anywhere and anytime. Moreover, in the past, music used various things such as treatment, stopping war and assisting to make folks relax. In addition, nowadays, many communities listen to music, and they find solace in that. For example, In South Korea, there is a pop culture called K-pop and a famous singer named BTS who made songs from their experiences and encouraged others so that numerous world individuals listen to their songs and feel comfortable, which leads to peace and relaxation. For this reason, I believe that music has power in people's minds and some music is used for treatment. This phenomenon remains the shared expression of humanity because the majority of communities listen to BTS music, and they want to learn Korean so it is beneficial to South Koreans. On the other hand, some countries use music to control their citizens because they make people loyal so that they dominate their nation permanently. For instance, In North Korea, they make music only for their dictator because if they make various music genres, that dictator will kill them. Furthermore, most of their citizens do not talk about opera or musicals because they have no freedom. Therefore, these kinds of nations do not share a language of humanity, which is a tragic situation. In conclusion, I partially agree with this topic. Today, we can listen to music and communicate with each other using music language. Conversely, some countries cannot listen to any music they must listen to music about their dictators. So, we should try to assist those kinds of nations because we are global citizens, and they deserve to rights listen to various music.

Your lexical resource score is 6.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Music has always been and continues to be the universal language of mankind. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people believe that throughout history and still today, music remains the shared language of humanity. I partially agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, we live in a globalised era also our technology is developed, we can listen to music anywhere and anytime. Moreover, in the past, music used various things such as treatment, stopping war and assisting to make folks relax. In addition, nowadays, many communities listen to music, and they find solace in that. For example, In South Korea, there is a pop culture called K-pop and a famous singer named BTS who made songs from their experiences and encouraged others so that numerous world individuals listen to their songs and feel comfortable, which leads to peace and relaxation. For this reason, I believe that music has power in people's minds and some music is used for treatment. This phenomenon remains the shared expression of humanity because the majority of communities listen to BTS music, and they want to learn Korean so it is beneficial to South Koreans. On the other hand, some countries use music to control their citizens because they make people loyal so that they dominate their nation permanently. For instance, In North Korea, they make music only for their dictator because if they make various music genres, that dictator will kill them. Furthermore, most of their citizens do not talk about opera or musicals because they have no freedom. Therefore, these kinds of nations do not share a language of humanity, which is a tragic situation. In conclusion, I partially agree with this topic. Today, we can listen to music and communicate with each other using music language. Conversely, some countries cannot listen to any music they must listen to music about their dictators. So, we should try to assist those kinds of nations because we are global citizens, and they deserve to rights listen to various music. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 6.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Music has always been and continues to be the universal language of mankind. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people believe that throughout history and still today, music remains the shared language of humanity. I partially agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, we live in a globalised era also our technology is developed, we can listen to music anywhere and anytime. Moreover, in the past, music used various things such as treatment, stopping war and assisting to make folks relax. In addition, nowadays, many communities listen to music, and they find solace in that. For example, In South Korea, there is a pop culture called K-pop and a famous singer named BTS who made songs from their experiences and encouraged others so that numerous world individuals listen to their songs and feel comfortable, which leads to peace and relaxation. For this reason, I believe that music has power in people's minds and some music is used for treatment. This phenomenon remains the shared expression of humanity because the majority of communities listen to BTS music, and they want to learn Korean so it is beneficial to South Koreans. On the other hand, some countries use music to control their citizens because they make people loyal so that they dominate their nation permanently. For instance, In North Korea, they make music only for their dictator because if they make various music genres, that dictator will kill them. Furthermore, most of their citizens do not talk about opera or musicals because they have no freedom. Therefore, these kinds of nations do not share a language of humanity, which is a tragic situation. In conclusion, I partially agree with this topic. Today, we can listen to music and communicate with each other using music language. Conversely, some countries cannot listen to any music they must listen to music about their dictators. So, we should try to assist those kinds of nations because we are global citizens, and they deserve to rights listen to various music.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Music has always been and continues to be the universal language of mankind. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people believe that throughout history and still today, music remains the shared language of humanity. I partially agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, we live in a globalised era also our technology is developed, we can listen to music anywhere and anytime. Moreover, in the past, music used various things such as treatment, stopping war and assisting to make folks relax. In addition, nowadays, many communities listen to music, and they find solace in that. For example, In South Korea, there is a pop culture called K-pop and a famous singer named BTS who made songs from their experiences and encouraged others so that numerous world individuals listen to their songs and feel comfortable, which leads to peace and relaxation. For this reason, I believe that music has power in people's minds and some music is used for treatment. This phenomenon remains the shared expression of humanity because the majority of communities listen to BTS music, and they want to learn Korean so it is beneficial to South Koreans. On the other hand, some countries use music to control their citizens because they make people loyal so that they dominate their nation permanently. For instance, In North Korea, they make music only for their dictator because if they make various music genres, that dictator will kill them. Furthermore, most of their citizens do not talk about opera or musicals because they have no freedom. Therefore, these kinds of nations do not share a language of humanity, which is a tragic situation. In conclusion, I partially agree with this topic. Today, we can listen to music and communicate with each other using music language. Conversely, some countries cannot listen to any music they must listen to music about their dictators. So, we should try to assist those kinds of nations because we are global citizens, and they deserve to rights listen to various music. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Music has always been and continues to be the universal language of mankind. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people believe that throughout history and still today, music remains the shared language of humanity. I partially agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, we live in a globalised era also our technology is developed, we can listen to music anywhere and anytime. Moreover, in the past, music used various things such as treatment, stopping war and assisting to make folks relax. In addition, nowadays, many communities listen to music, and they find solace in that. For example, In South Korea, there is a pop culture called K-pop and a famous singer named BTS who made songs from their experiences and encouraged others so that numerous world individuals listen to their songs and feel comfortable, which leads to peace and relaxation. For this reason, I believe that music has power in people's minds and some music is used for treatment. This phenomenon remains the shared expression of humanity because the majority of communities listen to BTS music, and they want to learn Korean so it is beneficial to South Koreans. On the other hand, some countries use music to control their citizens because they make people loyal so that they dominate their nation permanently. For instance, In North Korea, they make music only for their dictator because if they make various music genres, that dictator will kill them. Furthermore, most of their citizens do not talk about opera or musicals because they have no freedom. Therefore, these kinds of nations do not share a language of humanity, which is a tragic situation. In conclusion, I partially agree with this topic. Today, we can listen to music and communicate with each other using music language. Conversely, some countries cannot listen to any music they must listen to music about their dictators. So, we should try to assist those kinds of nations because we are global citizens, and they deserve to rights listen to various music.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Music has always been and continues to be the universal language of mankind. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Some people believe that throughout history and still today, music remains the shared language of humanity. I partially agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, we live in a globalised era also our technology is developed, we can listen to music anywhere and anytime. Moreover, in the past, music used various things such as treatment, stopping war and assisting to make folks relax. In addition, nowadays, many communities listen to music, and they find solace in that. For example, In South Korea, there is a pop culture called K-pop and a famous singer named BTS who made songs from their experiences and encouraged others so that numerous world individuals listen to their songs and feel comfortable, which leads to peace and relaxation. For this reason, I believe that music has power in people's minds and some music is used for treatment. This phenomenon remains the shared expression of humanity because the majority of communities listen to BTS music, and they want to learn Korean so it is beneficial to South Koreans. On the other hand, some countries use music to control their citizens because they make people loyal so that they dominate their nation permanently. For instance, In North Korea, they make music only for their dictator because if they make various music genres, that dictator will kill them. Furthermore, most of their citizens do not talk about opera or musicals because they have no freedom. Therefore, these kinds of nations do not share a language of humanity, which is a tragic situation. In conclusion, I partially agree with this topic. Today, we can listen to music and communicate with each other using music language. Conversely, some countries cannot listen to any music they must listen to music about their dictators. So, we should try to assist those kinds of nations because we are global citizens, and they deserve to rights listen to various music. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: People try to change their look by changing the colour of their hair using cosmetics, wearing jewellery or even having a plastic surgery done. Why do you think people do it? Do you think changing a look is a good thing. Anwser: Having a perfect look is a life-long dream for many people. So they make many changes when it comes to styling, for example, a change in hair colour or style is easily noticed, Not only do some go under the knife to achieve that perfect look or simply wear jewellery that goes with the look. There are many reasons behind this trend. There is nothing wrong if somebody wants to make some changes in a look, however going for risky surgeries is not worth it, as their life is always at risk. To begin with, Nowadays, everybody wants to look like an actor or a model, and for this people make many changes in their overall appearance. Moreover, one of the main reasons is not feeling confident or some folks do not find themselves good-looking or beautiful and because of this, insecurities they get easily influenced by social media. They see posts of celebrities like Kylie, Kim, or Madison Beer who change their look with the help of plastic surgeons. For instance, a survey conducted by BBC showed that around seventy-nine per cent of Koreans have done something to their face to achieve a V-shaped jawline. In addition, people who are born with disabilities often need surgeries, which are usually done by special surgeons, They do this so they can get accepted by society just like any other normal individual. Moving further, this helps them a lot when it comes to their mental health as nobody likes to live with a lump on their forehead or damaged eye. A TV show named The Face is a good example, where people get makeovers by a well-trained team. In this process they get their hair and face done by professionals. To conclude, I am totally behind those folks who need makeovers so badly as they never get treated nicely by mobs Also pretty privilege is a thing. There is nothing wrong with saying that looks matter when it comes to finding a job or partner.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: People try to change their look by changing the colour of their hair using cosmetics, wearing jewellery or even having a plastic surgery done. Why do you think people do it? Do you think changing a look is a good thing. Anwser: Having a perfect look is a life-long dream for many people. So they make many changes when it comes to styling, for example, a change in hair colour or style is easily noticed, Not only do some go under the knife to achieve that perfect look or simply wear jewellery that goes with the look. There are many reasons behind this trend. There is nothing wrong if somebody wants to make some changes in a look, however going for risky surgeries is not worth it, as their life is always at risk. To begin with, Nowadays, everybody wants to look like an actor or a model, and for this people make many changes in their overall appearance. Moreover, one of the main reasons is not feeling confident or some folks do not find themselves good-looking or beautiful and because of this, insecurities they get easily influenced by social media. They see posts of celebrities like Kylie, Kim, or Madison Beer who change their look with the help of plastic surgeons. For instance, a survey conducted by BBC showed that around seventy-nine per cent of Koreans have done something to their face to achieve a V-shaped jawline. In addition, people who are born with disabilities often need surgeries, which are usually done by special surgeons, They do this so they can get accepted by society just like any other normal individual. Moving further, this helps them a lot when it comes to their mental health as nobody likes to live with a lump on their forehead or damaged eye. A TV show named The Face is a good example, where people get makeovers by a well-trained team. In this process they get their hair and face done by professionals. To conclude, I am totally behind those folks who need makeovers so badly as they never get treated nicely by mobs Also pretty privilege is a thing. There is nothing wrong with saying that looks matter when it comes to finding a job or partner. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: People try to change their look by changing the colour of their hair using cosmetics, wearing jewellery or even having a plastic surgery done. Why do you think people do it? Do you think changing a look is a good thing. Anwser: Having a perfect look is a life-long dream for many people. So they make many changes when it comes to styling, for example, a change in hair colour or style is easily noticed, Not only do some go under the knife to achieve that perfect look or simply wear jewellery that goes with the look. There are many reasons behind this trend. There is nothing wrong if somebody wants to make some changes in a look, however going for risky surgeries is not worth it, as their life is always at risk. To begin with, Nowadays, everybody wants to look like an actor or a model, and for this people make many changes in their overall appearance. Moreover, one of the main reasons is not feeling confident or some folks do not find themselves good-looking or beautiful and because of this, insecurities they get easily influenced by social media. They see posts of celebrities like Kylie, Kim, or Madison Beer who change their look with the help of plastic surgeons. For instance, a survey conducted by BBC showed that around seventy-nine per cent of Koreans have done something to their face to achieve a V-shaped jawline. In addition, people who are born with disabilities often need surgeries, which are usually done by special surgeons, They do this so they can get accepted by society just like any other normal individual. Moving further, this helps them a lot when it comes to their mental health as nobody likes to live with a lump on their forehead or damaged eye. A TV show named The Face is a good example, where people get makeovers by a well-trained team. In this process they get their hair and face done by professionals. To conclude, I am totally behind those folks who need makeovers so badly as they never get treated nicely by mobs Also pretty privilege is a thing. There is nothing wrong with saying that looks matter when it comes to finding a job or partner.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: People try to change their look by changing the colour of their hair using cosmetics, wearing jewellery or even having a plastic surgery done. Why do you think people do it? Do you think changing a look is a good thing. Anwser: Having a perfect look is a life-long dream for many people. So they make many changes when it comes to styling, for example, a change in hair colour or style is easily noticed, Not only do some go under the knife to achieve that perfect look or simply wear jewellery that goes with the look. There are many reasons behind this trend. There is nothing wrong if somebody wants to make some changes in a look, however going for risky surgeries is not worth it, as their life is always at risk. To begin with, Nowadays, everybody wants to look like an actor or a model, and for this people make many changes in their overall appearance. Moreover, one of the main reasons is not feeling confident or some folks do not find themselves good-looking or beautiful and because of this, insecurities they get easily influenced by social media. They see posts of celebrities like Kylie, Kim, or Madison Beer who change their look with the help of plastic surgeons. For instance, a survey conducted by BBC showed that around seventy-nine per cent of Koreans have done something to their face to achieve a V-shaped jawline. In addition, people who are born with disabilities often need surgeries, which are usually done by special surgeons, They do this so they can get accepted by society just like any other normal individual. Moving further, this helps them a lot when it comes to their mental health as nobody likes to live with a lump on their forehead or damaged eye. A TV show named The Face is a good example, where people get makeovers by a well-trained team. In this process they get their hair and face done by professionals. To conclude, I am totally behind those folks who need makeovers so badly as they never get treated nicely by mobs Also pretty privilege is a thing. There is nothing wrong with saying that looks matter when it comes to finding a job or partner. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: People try to change their look by changing the colour of their hair using cosmetics, wearing jewellery or even having a plastic surgery done. Why do you think people do it? Do you think changing a look is a good thing. Anwser: Having a perfect look is a life-long dream for many people. So they make many changes when it comes to styling, for example, a change in hair colour or style is easily noticed, Not only do some go under the knife to achieve that perfect look or simply wear jewellery that goes with the look. There are many reasons behind this trend. There is nothing wrong if somebody wants to make some changes in a look, however going for risky surgeries is not worth it, as their life is always at risk. To begin with, Nowadays, everybody wants to look like an actor or a model, and for this people make many changes in their overall appearance. Moreover, one of the main reasons is not feeling confident or some folks do not find themselves good-looking or beautiful and because of this, insecurities they get easily influenced by social media. They see posts of celebrities like Kylie, Kim, or Madison Beer who change their look with the help of plastic surgeons. For instance, a survey conducted by BBC showed that around seventy-nine per cent of Koreans have done something to their face to achieve a V-shaped jawline. In addition, people who are born with disabilities often need surgeries, which are usually done by special surgeons, They do this so they can get accepted by society just like any other normal individual. Moving further, this helps them a lot when it comes to their mental health as nobody likes to live with a lump on their forehead or damaged eye. A TV show named The Face is a good example, where people get makeovers by a well-trained team. In this process they get their hair and face done by professionals. To conclude, I am totally behind those folks who need makeovers so badly as they never get treated nicely by mobs Also pretty privilege is a thing. There is nothing wrong with saying that looks matter when it comes to finding a job or partner.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: People try to change their look by changing the colour of their hair using cosmetics, wearing jewellery or even having a plastic surgery done. Why do you think people do it? Do you think changing a look is a good thing. Anwser: Having a perfect look is a life-long dream for many people. So they make many changes when it comes to styling, for example, a change in hair colour or style is easily noticed, Not only do some go under the knife to achieve that perfect look or simply wear jewellery that goes with the look. There are many reasons behind this trend. There is nothing wrong if somebody wants to make some changes in a look, however going for risky surgeries is not worth it, as their life is always at risk. To begin with, Nowadays, everybody wants to look like an actor or a model, and for this people make many changes in their overall appearance. Moreover, one of the main reasons is not feeling confident or some folks do not find themselves good-looking or beautiful and because of this, insecurities they get easily influenced by social media. They see posts of celebrities like Kylie, Kim, or Madison Beer who change their look with the help of plastic surgeons. For instance, a survey conducted by BBC showed that around seventy-nine per cent of Koreans have done something to their face to achieve a V-shaped jawline. In addition, people who are born with disabilities often need surgeries, which are usually done by special surgeons, They do this so they can get accepted by society just like any other normal individual. Moving further, this helps them a lot when it comes to their mental health as nobody likes to live with a lump on their forehead or damaged eye. A TV show named The Face is a good example, where people get makeovers by a well-trained team. In this process they get their hair and face done by professionals. To conclude, I am totally behind those folks who need makeovers so badly as they never get treated nicely by mobs Also pretty privilege is a thing. There is nothing wrong with saying that looks matter when it comes to finding a job or partner. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: People try to change their look by changing the colour of their hair using cosmetics, wearing jewellery or even having a plastic surgery done. Why do you think people do it? Do you think changing a look is a good thing. Anwser: Having a perfect look is a life-long dream for many people. So they make many changes when it comes to styling, for example, a change in hair colour or style is easily noticed, Not only do some go under the knife to achieve that perfect look or simply wear jewellery that goes with the look. There are many reasons behind this trend. There is nothing wrong if somebody wants to make some changes in a look, however going for risky surgeries is not worth it, as their life is always at risk. To begin with, Nowadays, everybody wants to look like an actor or a model, and for this people make many changes in their overall appearance. Moreover, one of the main reasons is not feeling confident or some folks do not find themselves good-looking or beautiful and because of this, insecurities they get easily influenced by social media. They see posts of celebrities like Kylie, Kim, or Madison Beer who change their look with the help of plastic surgeons. For instance, a survey conducted by BBC showed that around seventy-nine per cent of Koreans have done something to their face to achieve a V-shaped jawline. In addition, people who are born with disabilities often need surgeries, which are usually done by special surgeons, They do this so they can get accepted by society just like any other normal individual. Moving further, this helps them a lot when it comes to their mental health as nobody likes to live with a lump on their forehead or damaged eye. A TV show named The Face is a good example, where people get makeovers by a well-trained team. In this process they get their hair and face done by professionals. To conclude, I am totally behind those folks who need makeovers so badly as they never get treated nicely by mobs Also pretty privilege is a thing. There is nothing wrong with saying that looks matter when it comes to finding a job or partner.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: People try to change their look by changing the colour of their hair using cosmetics, wearing jewellery or even having a plastic surgery done. Why do you think people do it? Do you think changing a look is a good thing. Anwser: Having a perfect look is a life-long dream for many people. So they make many changes when it comes to styling, for example, a change in hair colour or style is easily noticed, Not only do some go under the knife to achieve that perfect look or simply wear jewellery that goes with the look. There are many reasons behind this trend. There is nothing wrong if somebody wants to make some changes in a look, however going for risky surgeries is not worth it, as their life is always at risk. To begin with, Nowadays, everybody wants to look like an actor or a model, and for this people make many changes in their overall appearance. Moreover, one of the main reasons is not feeling confident or some folks do not find themselves good-looking or beautiful and because of this, insecurities they get easily influenced by social media. They see posts of celebrities like Kylie, Kim, or Madison Beer who change their look with the help of plastic surgeons. For instance, a survey conducted by BBC showed that around seventy-nine per cent of Koreans have done something to their face to achieve a V-shaped jawline. In addition, people who are born with disabilities often need surgeries, which are usually done by special surgeons, They do this so they can get accepted by society just like any other normal individual. Moving further, this helps them a lot when it comes to their mental health as nobody likes to live with a lump on their forehead or damaged eye. A TV show named The Face is a good example, where people get makeovers by a well-trained team. In this process they get their hair and face done by professionals. To conclude, I am totally behind those folks who need makeovers so badly as they never get treated nicely by mobs Also pretty privilege is a thing. There is nothing wrong with saying that looks matter when it comes to finding a job or partner. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: traffic jam is a problem in many cities and towns, To solve this problem, some suggest building underground railway, while others suggest expanding the road. Which one do you think is the best way? Anwser: The global urbanization has been affecting most cities in the world. Many people prefer to live in a big city in order to get a well-paid job and a career. The tendency to move from rural areas to the cities has changed the infrastructure and caused some issues around road facilities. In my essay, I will talk about the solutions to improve the situation with traffic conjunctions - to build a new road or a metro. In my opinion, any decision, which can be made towards resolving traffic jams on the road, will work out effectively. Firstly, to build a new metro will be enormously expensive for the government, but more sufficient for people. Moreover, an underground has some particular benefits such as a perfect system with the exact timetable. Saying that dwellers can rely on the subway and never be late for work or an important meeting. Furthermore, the metro will reduce traffic on the roads, because fewer people will use cars. Consequently, the construction of the tube is beneficial for the modern society. On the other hand, as I mentioned above, building the underground costs money. As an alternative, with less financial investment, the state can expand the road system which will help decrease the traffic conjunction. Although the idea of building more roads can be beneficial for drivers the fact that increasing number of cars will lead to environmental pollution. Thus, the government must take into account the fact of increasing carbon emissions with the growth of cars. To sum up, any plan to reduce traffic jams will definitely work for the general public. But, before making a decision the state should think about the consequences for the environment and try to keep a balance between human convenience and well-being of nature.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: traffic jam is a problem in many cities and towns, To solve this problem, some suggest building underground railway, while others suggest expanding the road. Which one do you think is the best way? Anwser: The global urbanization has been affecting most cities in the world. Many people prefer to live in a big city in order to get a well-paid job and a career. The tendency to move from rural areas to the cities has changed the infrastructure and caused some issues around road facilities. In my essay, I will talk about the solutions to improve the situation with traffic conjunctions - to build a new road or a metro. In my opinion, any decision, which can be made towards resolving traffic jams on the road, will work out effectively. Firstly, to build a new metro will be enormously expensive for the government, but more sufficient for people. Moreover, an underground has some particular benefits such as a perfect system with the exact timetable. Saying that dwellers can rely on the subway and never be late for work or an important meeting. Furthermore, the metro will reduce traffic on the roads, because fewer people will use cars. Consequently, the construction of the tube is beneficial for the modern society. On the other hand, as I mentioned above, building the underground costs money. As an alternative, with less financial investment, the state can expand the road system which will help decrease the traffic conjunction. Although the idea of building more roads can be beneficial for drivers the fact that increasing number of cars will lead to environmental pollution. Thus, the government must take into account the fact of increasing carbon emissions with the growth of cars. To sum up, any plan to reduce traffic jams will definitely work for the general public. But, before making a decision the state should think about the consequences for the environment and try to keep a balance between human convenience and well-being of nature. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: traffic jam is a problem in many cities and towns, To solve this problem, some suggest building underground railway, while others suggest expanding the road. Which one do you think is the best way? Anwser: The global urbanization has been affecting most cities in the world. Many people prefer to live in a big city in order to get a well-paid job and a career. The tendency to move from rural areas to the cities has changed the infrastructure and caused some issues around road facilities. In my essay, I will talk about the solutions to improve the situation with traffic conjunctions - to build a new road or a metro. In my opinion, any decision, which can be made towards resolving traffic jams on the road, will work out effectively. Firstly, to build a new metro will be enormously expensive for the government, but more sufficient for people. Moreover, an underground has some particular benefits such as a perfect system with the exact timetable. Saying that dwellers can rely on the subway and never be late for work or an important meeting. Furthermore, the metro will reduce traffic on the roads, because fewer people will use cars. Consequently, the construction of the tube is beneficial for the modern society. On the other hand, as I mentioned above, building the underground costs money. As an alternative, with less financial investment, the state can expand the road system which will help decrease the traffic conjunction. Although the idea of building more roads can be beneficial for drivers the fact that increasing number of cars will lead to environmental pollution. Thus, the government must take into account the fact of increasing carbon emissions with the growth of cars. To sum up, any plan to reduce traffic jams will definitely work for the general public. But, before making a decision the state should think about the consequences for the environment and try to keep a balance between human convenience and well-being of nature.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: traffic jam is a problem in many cities and towns, To solve this problem, some suggest building underground railway, while others suggest expanding the road. Which one do you think is the best way? Anwser: The global urbanization has been affecting most cities in the world. Many people prefer to live in a big city in order to get a well-paid job and a career. The tendency to move from rural areas to the cities has changed the infrastructure and caused some issues around road facilities. In my essay, I will talk about the solutions to improve the situation with traffic conjunctions - to build a new road or a metro. In my opinion, any decision, which can be made towards resolving traffic jams on the road, will work out effectively. Firstly, to build a new metro will be enormously expensive for the government, but more sufficient for people. Moreover, an underground has some particular benefits such as a perfect system with the exact timetable. Saying that dwellers can rely on the subway and never be late for work or an important meeting. Furthermore, the metro will reduce traffic on the roads, because fewer people will use cars. Consequently, the construction of the tube is beneficial for the modern society. On the other hand, as I mentioned above, building the underground costs money. As an alternative, with less financial investment, the state can expand the road system which will help decrease the traffic conjunction. Although the idea of building more roads can be beneficial for drivers the fact that increasing number of cars will lead to environmental pollution. Thus, the government must take into account the fact of increasing carbon emissions with the growth of cars. To sum up, any plan to reduce traffic jams will definitely work for the general public. But, before making a decision the state should think about the consequences for the environment and try to keep a balance between human convenience and well-being of nature. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: traffic jam is a problem in many cities and towns, To solve this problem, some suggest building underground railway, while others suggest expanding the road. Which one do you think is the best way? Anwser: The global urbanization has been affecting most cities in the world. Many people prefer to live in a big city in order to get a well-paid job and a career. The tendency to move from rural areas to the cities has changed the infrastructure and caused some issues around road facilities. In my essay, I will talk about the solutions to improve the situation with traffic conjunctions - to build a new road or a metro. In my opinion, any decision, which can be made towards resolving traffic jams on the road, will work out effectively. Firstly, to build a new metro will be enormously expensive for the government, but more sufficient for people. Moreover, an underground has some particular benefits such as a perfect system with the exact timetable. Saying that dwellers can rely on the subway and never be late for work or an important meeting. Furthermore, the metro will reduce traffic on the roads, because fewer people will use cars. Consequently, the construction of the tube is beneficial for the modern society. On the other hand, as I mentioned above, building the underground costs money. As an alternative, with less financial investment, the state can expand the road system which will help decrease the traffic conjunction. Although the idea of building more roads can be beneficial for drivers the fact that increasing number of cars will lead to environmental pollution. Thus, the government must take into account the fact of increasing carbon emissions with the growth of cars. To sum up, any plan to reduce traffic jams will definitely work for the general public. But, before making a decision the state should think about the consequences for the environment and try to keep a balance between human convenience and well-being of nature.

Your grammatical range score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: traffic jam is a problem in many cities and towns, To solve this problem, some suggest building underground railway, while others suggest expanding the road. Which one do you think is the best way? Anwser: The global urbanization has been affecting most cities in the world. Many people prefer to live in a big city in order to get a well-paid job and a career. The tendency to move from rural areas to the cities has changed the infrastructure and caused some issues around road facilities. In my essay, I will talk about the solutions to improve the situation with traffic conjunctions - to build a new road or a metro. In my opinion, any decision, which can be made towards resolving traffic jams on the road, will work out effectively. Firstly, to build a new metro will be enormously expensive for the government, but more sufficient for people. Moreover, an underground has some particular benefits such as a perfect system with the exact timetable. Saying that dwellers can rely on the subway and never be late for work or an important meeting. Furthermore, the metro will reduce traffic on the roads, because fewer people will use cars. Consequently, the construction of the tube is beneficial for the modern society. On the other hand, as I mentioned above, building the underground costs money. As an alternative, with less financial investment, the state can expand the road system which will help decrease the traffic conjunction. Although the idea of building more roads can be beneficial for drivers the fact that increasing number of cars will lead to environmental pollution. Thus, the government must take into account the fact of increasing carbon emissions with the growth of cars. To sum up, any plan to reduce traffic jams will definitely work for the general public. But, before making a decision the state should think about the consequences for the environment and try to keep a balance between human convenience and well-being of nature. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: traffic jam is a problem in many cities and towns, To solve this problem, some suggest building underground railway, while others suggest expanding the road. Which one do you think is the best way? Anwser: The global urbanization has been affecting most cities in the world. Many people prefer to live in a big city in order to get a well-paid job and a career. The tendency to move from rural areas to the cities has changed the infrastructure and caused some issues around road facilities. In my essay, I will talk about the solutions to improve the situation with traffic conjunctions - to build a new road or a metro. In my opinion, any decision, which can be made towards resolving traffic jams on the road, will work out effectively. Firstly, to build a new metro will be enormously expensive for the government, but more sufficient for people. Moreover, an underground has some particular benefits such as a perfect system with the exact timetable. Saying that dwellers can rely on the subway and never be late for work or an important meeting. Furthermore, the metro will reduce traffic on the roads, because fewer people will use cars. Consequently, the construction of the tube is beneficial for the modern society. On the other hand, as I mentioned above, building the underground costs money. As an alternative, with less financial investment, the state can expand the road system which will help decrease the traffic conjunction. Although the idea of building more roads can be beneficial for drivers the fact that increasing number of cars will lead to environmental pollution. Thus, the government must take into account the fact of increasing carbon emissions with the growth of cars. To sum up, any plan to reduce traffic jams will definitely work for the general public. But, before making a decision the state should think about the consequences for the environment and try to keep a balance between human convenience and well-being of nature.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: traffic jam is a problem in many cities and towns, To solve this problem, some suggest building underground railway, while others suggest expanding the road. Which one do you think is the best way? Anwser: The global urbanization has been affecting most cities in the world. Many people prefer to live in a big city in order to get a well-paid job and a career. The tendency to move from rural areas to the cities has changed the infrastructure and caused some issues around road facilities. In my essay, I will talk about the solutions to improve the situation with traffic conjunctions - to build a new road or a metro. In my opinion, any decision, which can be made towards resolving traffic jams on the road, will work out effectively. Firstly, to build a new metro will be enormously expensive for the government, but more sufficient for people. Moreover, an underground has some particular benefits such as a perfect system with the exact timetable. Saying that dwellers can rely on the subway and never be late for work or an important meeting. Furthermore, the metro will reduce traffic on the roads, because fewer people will use cars. Consequently, the construction of the tube is beneficial for the modern society. On the other hand, as I mentioned above, building the underground costs money. As an alternative, with less financial investment, the state can expand the road system which will help decrease the traffic conjunction. Although the idea of building more roads can be beneficial for drivers the fact that increasing number of cars will lead to environmental pollution. Thus, the government must take into account the fact of increasing carbon emissions with the growth of cars. To sum up, any plan to reduce traffic jams will definitely work for the general public. But, before making a decision the state should think about the consequences for the environment and try to keep a balance between human convenience and well-being of nature. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Nowadays, because of our technological development, pupils can easily access data on the Internet, so some people think that libraries will be unnecessary in the future. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our technology is developed, so we live comfortably more than in the past, and many IT devices have been invented, which means learners do not need to buy textbooks; they can download them onto their IT devices and use them in their class. For example, in advanced nations, they are introduced to the majority of implements and use their class and teach their pupils. As a result, students do not go to libraries anymore because they can find data so easily and fast. In addition, In New Zealand, most schools tell their learners to bring IT gadgets, which leads to learning data as well as knowledge. Therefore, they think libraries are unnecessary. Furthermore, if students encounter any difficulties and there is no adult around them, they can find details easily, and if they want some novels and fiction, they can buy those reports on the Internet and see them anywhere, which means they do not have to go to libraries. For instance, In South Korea, in Seoul, there were a lot of bookstores in past. At that time, numerous individuals had to purchase a book, even pupils but now most learners can see records on the Internet consequently, the majority of libraries disappeared. Hence, in the future, a few libraries stay the same and others will not. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. In the past, we did not have any digital things, but now we have invented IT technology, so plenty of folks do not want to go to libraries because most communities have their own IT devices. However, libraries are a crucial thing because, in libraries, there are many history bills written by ancestors. So, we must preserve them very carefully because those charges are part of our heritage.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Nowadays, because of our technological development, pupils can easily access data on the Internet, so some people think that libraries will be unnecessary in the future. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our technology is developed, so we live comfortably more than in the past, and many IT devices have been invented, which means learners do not need to buy textbooks; they can download them onto their IT devices and use them in their class. For example, in advanced nations, they are introduced to the majority of implements and use their class and teach their pupils. As a result, students do not go to libraries anymore because they can find data so easily and fast. In addition, In New Zealand, most schools tell their learners to bring IT gadgets, which leads to learning data as well as knowledge. Therefore, they think libraries are unnecessary. Furthermore, if students encounter any difficulties and there is no adult around them, they can find details easily, and if they want some novels and fiction, they can buy those reports on the Internet and see them anywhere, which means they do not have to go to libraries. For instance, In South Korea, in Seoul, there were a lot of bookstores in past. At that time, numerous individuals had to purchase a book, even pupils but now most learners can see records on the Internet consequently, the majority of libraries disappeared. Hence, in the future, a few libraries stay the same and others will not. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. In the past, we did not have any digital things, but now we have invented IT technology, so plenty of folks do not want to go to libraries because most communities have their own IT devices. However, libraries are a crucial thing because, in libraries, there are many history bills written by ancestors. So, we must preserve them very carefully because those charges are part of our heritage. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Nowadays, because of our technological development, pupils can easily access data on the Internet, so some people think that libraries will be unnecessary in the future. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our technology is developed, so we live comfortably more than in the past, and many IT devices have been invented, which means learners do not need to buy textbooks; they can download them onto their IT devices and use them in their class. For example, in advanced nations, they are introduced to the majority of implements and use their class and teach their pupils. As a result, students do not go to libraries anymore because they can find data so easily and fast. In addition, In New Zealand, most schools tell their learners to bring IT gadgets, which leads to learning data as well as knowledge. Therefore, they think libraries are unnecessary. Furthermore, if students encounter any difficulties and there is no adult around them, they can find details easily, and if they want some novels and fiction, they can buy those reports on the Internet and see them anywhere, which means they do not have to go to libraries. For instance, In South Korea, in Seoul, there were a lot of bookstores in past. At that time, numerous individuals had to purchase a book, even pupils but now most learners can see records on the Internet consequently, the majority of libraries disappeared. Hence, in the future, a few libraries stay the same and others will not. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. In the past, we did not have any digital things, but now we have invented IT technology, so plenty of folks do not want to go to libraries because most communities have their own IT devices. However, libraries are a crucial thing because, in libraries, there are many history bills written by ancestors. So, we must preserve them very carefully because those charges are part of our heritage.

Your lexical resource score is 6.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Nowadays, because of our technological development, pupils can easily access data on the Internet, so some people think that libraries will be unnecessary in the future. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our technology is developed, so we live comfortably more than in the past, and many IT devices have been invented, which means learners do not need to buy textbooks; they can download them onto their IT devices and use them in their class. For example, in advanced nations, they are introduced to the majority of implements and use their class and teach their pupils. As a result, students do not go to libraries anymore because they can find data so easily and fast. In addition, In New Zealand, most schools tell their learners to bring IT gadgets, which leads to learning data as well as knowledge. Therefore, they think libraries are unnecessary. Furthermore, if students encounter any difficulties and there is no adult around them, they can find details easily, and if they want some novels and fiction, they can buy those reports on the Internet and see them anywhere, which means they do not have to go to libraries. For instance, In South Korea, in Seoul, there were a lot of bookstores in past. At that time, numerous individuals had to purchase a book, even pupils but now most learners can see records on the Internet consequently, the majority of libraries disappeared. Hence, in the future, a few libraries stay the same and others will not. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. In the past, we did not have any digital things, but now we have invented IT technology, so plenty of folks do not want to go to libraries because most communities have their own IT devices. However, libraries are a crucial thing because, in libraries, there are many history bills written by ancestors. So, we must preserve them very carefully because those charges are part of our heritage. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 6.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Nowadays, because of our technological development, pupils can easily access data on the Internet, so some people think that libraries will be unnecessary in the future. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our technology is developed, so we live comfortably more than in the past, and many IT devices have been invented, which means learners do not need to buy textbooks; they can download them onto their IT devices and use them in their class. For example, in advanced nations, they are introduced to the majority of implements and use their class and teach their pupils. As a result, students do not go to libraries anymore because they can find data so easily and fast. In addition, In New Zealand, most schools tell their learners to bring IT gadgets, which leads to learning data as well as knowledge. Therefore, they think libraries are unnecessary. Furthermore, if students encounter any difficulties and there is no adult around them, they can find details easily, and if they want some novels and fiction, they can buy those reports on the Internet and see them anywhere, which means they do not have to go to libraries. For instance, In South Korea, in Seoul, there were a lot of bookstores in past. At that time, numerous individuals had to purchase a book, even pupils but now most learners can see records on the Internet consequently, the majority of libraries disappeared. Hence, in the future, a few libraries stay the same and others will not. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. In the past, we did not have any digital things, but now we have invented IT technology, so plenty of folks do not want to go to libraries because most communities have their own IT devices. However, libraries are a crucial thing because, in libraries, there are many history bills written by ancestors. So, we must preserve them very carefully because those charges are part of our heritage.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Nowadays, because of our technological development, pupils can easily access data on the Internet, so some people think that libraries will be unnecessary in the future. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our technology is developed, so we live comfortably more than in the past, and many IT devices have been invented, which means learners do not need to buy textbooks; they can download them onto their IT devices and use them in their class. For example, in advanced nations, they are introduced to the majority of implements and use their class and teach their pupils. As a result, students do not go to libraries anymore because they can find data so easily and fast. In addition, In New Zealand, most schools tell their learners to bring IT gadgets, which leads to learning data as well as knowledge. Therefore, they think libraries are unnecessary. Furthermore, if students encounter any difficulties and there is no adult around them, they can find details easily, and if they want some novels and fiction, they can buy those reports on the Internet and see them anywhere, which means they do not have to go to libraries. For instance, In South Korea, in Seoul, there were a lot of bookstores in past. At that time, numerous individuals had to purchase a book, even pupils but now most learners can see records on the Internet consequently, the majority of libraries disappeared. Hence, in the future, a few libraries stay the same and others will not. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. In the past, we did not have any digital things, but now we have invented IT technology, so plenty of folks do not want to go to libraries because most communities have their own IT devices. However, libraries are a crucial thing because, in libraries, there are many history bills written by ancestors. So, we must preserve them very carefully because those charges are part of our heritage. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Nowadays, because of our technological development, pupils can easily access data on the Internet, so some people think that libraries will be unnecessary in the future. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our technology is developed, so we live comfortably more than in the past, and many IT devices have been invented, which means learners do not need to buy textbooks; they can download them onto their IT devices and use them in their class. For example, in advanced nations, they are introduced to the majority of implements and use their class and teach their pupils. As a result, students do not go to libraries anymore because they can find data so easily and fast. In addition, In New Zealand, most schools tell their learners to bring IT gadgets, which leads to learning data as well as knowledge. Therefore, they think libraries are unnecessary. Furthermore, if students encounter any difficulties and there is no adult around them, they can find details easily, and if they want some novels and fiction, they can buy those reports on the Internet and see them anywhere, which means they do not have to go to libraries. For instance, In South Korea, in Seoul, there were a lot of bookstores in past. At that time, numerous individuals had to purchase a book, even pupils but now most learners can see records on the Internet consequently, the majority of libraries disappeared. Hence, in the future, a few libraries stay the same and others will not. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. In the past, we did not have any digital things, but now we have invented IT technology, so plenty of folks do not want to go to libraries because most communities have their own IT devices. However, libraries are a crucial thing because, in libraries, there are many history bills written by ancestors. So, we must preserve them very carefully because those charges are part of our heritage.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Students can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Nowadays, because of our technological development, pupils can easily access data on the Internet, so some people think that libraries will be unnecessary in the future. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the given statement, and I will elaborate on it in this essay. On the one hand, today, our technology is developed, so we live comfortably more than in the past, and many IT devices have been invented, which means learners do not need to buy textbooks; they can download them onto their IT devices and use them in their class. For example, in advanced nations, they are introduced to the majority of implements and use their class and teach their pupils. As a result, students do not go to libraries anymore because they can find data so easily and fast. In addition, In New Zealand, most schools tell their learners to bring IT gadgets, which leads to learning data as well as knowledge. Therefore, they think libraries are unnecessary. Furthermore, if students encounter any difficulties and there is no adult around them, they can find details easily, and if they want some novels and fiction, they can buy those reports on the Internet and see them anywhere, which means they do not have to go to libraries. For instance, In South Korea, in Seoul, there were a lot of bookstores in past. At that time, numerous individuals had to purchase a book, even pupils but now most learners can see records on the Internet consequently, the majority of libraries disappeared. Hence, in the future, a few libraries stay the same and others will not. In conclusion, I completely agree with this topic. In the past, we did not have any digital things, but now we have invented IT technology, so plenty of folks do not want to go to libraries because most communities have their own IT devices. However, libraries are a crucial thing because, in libraries, there are many history bills written by ancestors. So, we must preserve them very carefully because those charges are part of our heritage. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think has changed the way we worked? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? Anwser: These days, it can be noted that most employers use modern inventions to run their businesses. In my opinion, by using the latest technology, companies can do their work effectively, but when they rely on it too much, it can lead to a number of problems. Undoubtedly, using modern technology will not only enhance employees’ performance but also the company’s income. In other words, companies that use AI programs are able to finish their tasks within a short time. This is because they can generate more ideas easily compared to traditional methods in the past where they had to have a long discussion. For instance, marketing companies can come up with effective marketing strategies and ideas which can clearly help companies to improve their sales. Thus, with this, employees will have an easy working environment, while companies will gain more profits. The second advantage here by using modern technology restaurants and shops are able to give their services to customers when they are at home. Moreover, companies that had improved their system before covid 19 faced it perfectly. For example, Pizza Hut delivers their food for the consumer without any visiting needs, and that is just by one click in their own application. As a result, if restaurants and shops improved their service, they could earn high profits just by using the new technology. Finally, in the near future, people think companies will replace workers by relying on AI technologies, and that will cause many economic issues for citizens. Furthermore, if they lose their jobs, they will not cover their needs and expenses which leads to starvation. Because of that governments must control this development before damaging the future. To clarify my points in 2021 when Elon Musk had bought Twitter, he fired more than 65% of his employees because he could handle the whole of this International company without them by just relying on AI technology. Consequently, people around the world have experienced what Elon Musk did, and they have started to think cautiously about this development which can risk their careers. In conclusion, technologies are essential for growing companies' systems and services which are helpful for the customers to serve them without doing any little effort. However, it also has negative effects and may determine humanity's future.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think has changed the way we worked? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? Anwser: These days, it can be noted that most employers use modern inventions to run their businesses. In my opinion, by using the latest technology, companies can do their work effectively, but when they rely on it too much, it can lead to a number of problems. Undoubtedly, using modern technology will not only enhance employees’ performance but also the company’s income. In other words, companies that use AI programs are able to finish their tasks within a short time. This is because they can generate more ideas easily compared to traditional methods in the past where they had to have a long discussion. For instance, marketing companies can come up with effective marketing strategies and ideas which can clearly help companies to improve their sales. Thus, with this, employees will have an easy working environment, while companies will gain more profits. The second advantage here by using modern technology restaurants and shops are able to give their services to customers when they are at home. Moreover, companies that had improved their system before covid 19 faced it perfectly. For example, Pizza Hut delivers their food for the consumer without any visiting needs, and that is just by one click in their own application. As a result, if restaurants and shops improved their service, they could earn high profits just by using the new technology. Finally, in the near future, people think companies will replace workers by relying on AI technologies, and that will cause many economic issues for citizens. Furthermore, if they lose their jobs, they will not cover their needs and expenses which leads to starvation. Because of that governments must control this development before damaging the future. To clarify my points in 2021 when Elon Musk had bought Twitter, he fired more than 65% of his employees because he could handle the whole of this International company without them by just relying on AI technology. Consequently, people around the world have experienced what Elon Musk did, and they have started to think cautiously about this development which can risk their careers. In conclusion, technologies are essential for growing companies' systems and services which are helpful for the customers to serve them without doing any little effort. However, it also has negative effects and may determine humanity's future. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think has changed the way we worked? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? Anwser: These days, it can be noted that most employers use modern inventions to run their businesses. In my opinion, by using the latest technology, companies can do their work effectively, but when they rely on it too much, it can lead to a number of problems. Undoubtedly, using modern technology will not only enhance employees’ performance but also the company’s income. In other words, companies that use AI programs are able to finish their tasks within a short time. This is because they can generate more ideas easily compared to traditional methods in the past where they had to have a long discussion. For instance, marketing companies can come up with effective marketing strategies and ideas which can clearly help companies to improve their sales. Thus, with this, employees will have an easy working environment, while companies will gain more profits. The second advantage here by using modern technology restaurants and shops are able to give their services to customers when they are at home. Moreover, companies that had improved their system before covid 19 faced it perfectly. For example, Pizza Hut delivers their food for the consumer without any visiting needs, and that is just by one click in their own application. As a result, if restaurants and shops improved their service, they could earn high profits just by using the new technology. Finally, in the near future, people think companies will replace workers by relying on AI technologies, and that will cause many economic issues for citizens. Furthermore, if they lose their jobs, they will not cover their needs and expenses which leads to starvation. Because of that governments must control this development before damaging the future. To clarify my points in 2021 when Elon Musk had bought Twitter, he fired more than 65% of his employees because he could handle the whole of this International company without them by just relying on AI technology. Consequently, people around the world have experienced what Elon Musk did, and they have started to think cautiously about this development which can risk their careers. In conclusion, technologies are essential for growing companies' systems and services which are helpful for the customers to serve them without doing any little effort. However, it also has negative effects and may determine humanity's future.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think has changed the way we worked? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? Anwser: These days, it can be noted that most employers use modern inventions to run their businesses. In my opinion, by using the latest technology, companies can do their work effectively, but when they rely on it too much, it can lead to a number of problems. Undoubtedly, using modern technology will not only enhance employees’ performance but also the company’s income. In other words, companies that use AI programs are able to finish their tasks within a short time. This is because they can generate more ideas easily compared to traditional methods in the past where they had to have a long discussion. For instance, marketing companies can come up with effective marketing strategies and ideas which can clearly help companies to improve their sales. Thus, with this, employees will have an easy working environment, while companies will gain more profits. The second advantage here by using modern technology restaurants and shops are able to give their services to customers when they are at home. Moreover, companies that had improved their system before covid 19 faced it perfectly. For example, Pizza Hut delivers their food for the consumer without any visiting needs, and that is just by one click in their own application. As a result, if restaurants and shops improved their service, they could earn high profits just by using the new technology. Finally, in the near future, people think companies will replace workers by relying on AI technologies, and that will cause many economic issues for citizens. Furthermore, if they lose their jobs, they will not cover their needs and expenses which leads to starvation. Because of that governments must control this development before damaging the future. To clarify my points in 2021 when Elon Musk had bought Twitter, he fired more than 65% of his employees because he could handle the whole of this International company without them by just relying on AI technology. Consequently, people around the world have experienced what Elon Musk did, and they have started to think cautiously about this development which can risk their careers. In conclusion, technologies are essential for growing companies' systems and services which are helpful for the customers to serve them without doing any little effort. However, it also has negative effects and may determine humanity's future. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think has changed the way we worked? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? Anwser: These days, it can be noted that most employers use modern inventions to run their businesses. In my opinion, by using the latest technology, companies can do their work effectively, but when they rely on it too much, it can lead to a number of problems. Undoubtedly, using modern technology will not only enhance employees’ performance but also the company’s income. In other words, companies that use AI programs are able to finish their tasks within a short time. This is because they can generate more ideas easily compared to traditional methods in the past where they had to have a long discussion. For instance, marketing companies can come up with effective marketing strategies and ideas which can clearly help companies to improve their sales. Thus, with this, employees will have an easy working environment, while companies will gain more profits. The second advantage here by using modern technology restaurants and shops are able to give their services to customers when they are at home. Moreover, companies that had improved their system before covid 19 faced it perfectly. For example, Pizza Hut delivers their food for the consumer without any visiting needs, and that is just by one click in their own application. As a result, if restaurants and shops improved their service, they could earn high profits just by using the new technology. Finally, in the near future, people think companies will replace workers by relying on AI technologies, and that will cause many economic issues for citizens. Furthermore, if they lose their jobs, they will not cover their needs and expenses which leads to starvation. Because of that governments must control this development before damaging the future. To clarify my points in 2021 when Elon Musk had bought Twitter, he fired more than 65% of his employees because he could handle the whole of this International company without them by just relying on AI technology. Consequently, people around the world have experienced what Elon Musk did, and they have started to think cautiously about this development which can risk their careers. In conclusion, technologies are essential for growing companies' systems and services which are helpful for the customers to serve them without doing any little effort. However, it also has negative effects and may determine humanity's future.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think has changed the way we worked? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? Anwser: These days, it can be noted that most employers use modern inventions to run their businesses. In my opinion, by using the latest technology, companies can do their work effectively, but when they rely on it too much, it can lead to a number of problems. Undoubtedly, using modern technology will not only enhance employees’ performance but also the company’s income. In other words, companies that use AI programs are able to finish their tasks within a short time. This is because they can generate more ideas easily compared to traditional methods in the past where they had to have a long discussion. For instance, marketing companies can come up with effective marketing strategies and ideas which can clearly help companies to improve their sales. Thus, with this, employees will have an easy working environment, while companies will gain more profits. The second advantage here by using modern technology restaurants and shops are able to give their services to customers when they are at home. Moreover, companies that had improved their system before covid 19 faced it perfectly. For example, Pizza Hut delivers their food for the consumer without any visiting needs, and that is just by one click in their own application. As a result, if restaurants and shops improved their service, they could earn high profits just by using the new technology. Finally, in the near future, people think companies will replace workers by relying on AI technologies, and that will cause many economic issues for citizens. Furthermore, if they lose their jobs, they will not cover their needs and expenses which leads to starvation. Because of that governments must control this development before damaging the future. To clarify my points in 2021 when Elon Musk had bought Twitter, he fired more than 65% of his employees because he could handle the whole of this International company without them by just relying on AI technology. Consequently, people around the world have experienced what Elon Musk did, and they have started to think cautiously about this development which can risk their careers. In conclusion, technologies are essential for growing companies' systems and services which are helpful for the customers to serve them without doing any little effort. However, it also has negative effects and may determine humanity's future. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think has changed the way we worked? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? Anwser: These days, it can be noted that most employers use modern inventions to run their businesses. In my opinion, by using the latest technology, companies can do their work effectively, but when they rely on it too much, it can lead to a number of problems. Undoubtedly, using modern technology will not only enhance employees’ performance but also the company’s income. In other words, companies that use AI programs are able to finish their tasks within a short time. This is because they can generate more ideas easily compared to traditional methods in the past where they had to have a long discussion. For instance, marketing companies can come up with effective marketing strategies and ideas which can clearly help companies to improve their sales. Thus, with this, employees will have an easy working environment, while companies will gain more profits. The second advantage here by using modern technology restaurants and shops are able to give their services to customers when they are at home. Moreover, companies that had improved their system before covid 19 faced it perfectly. For example, Pizza Hut delivers their food for the consumer without any visiting needs, and that is just by one click in their own application. As a result, if restaurants and shops improved their service, they could earn high profits just by using the new technology. Finally, in the near future, people think companies will replace workers by relying on AI technologies, and that will cause many economic issues for citizens. Furthermore, if they lose their jobs, they will not cover their needs and expenses which leads to starvation. Because of that governments must control this development before damaging the future. To clarify my points in 2021 when Elon Musk had bought Twitter, he fired more than 65% of his employees because he could handle the whole of this International company without them by just relying on AI technology. Consequently, people around the world have experienced what Elon Musk did, and they have started to think cautiously about this development which can risk their careers. In conclusion, technologies are essential for growing companies' systems and services which are helpful for the customers to serve them without doing any little effort. However, it also has negative effects and may determine humanity's future.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think has changed the way we worked? Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? Anwser: These days, it can be noted that most employers use modern inventions to run their businesses. In my opinion, by using the latest technology, companies can do their work effectively, but when they rely on it too much, it can lead to a number of problems. Undoubtedly, using modern technology will not only enhance employees’ performance but also the company’s income. In other words, companies that use AI programs are able to finish their tasks within a short time. This is because they can generate more ideas easily compared to traditional methods in the past where they had to have a long discussion. For instance, marketing companies can come up with effective marketing strategies and ideas which can clearly help companies to improve their sales. Thus, with this, employees will have an easy working environment, while companies will gain more profits. The second advantage here by using modern technology restaurants and shops are able to give their services to customers when they are at home. Moreover, companies that had improved their system before covid 19 faced it perfectly. For example, Pizza Hut delivers their food for the consumer without any visiting needs, and that is just by one click in their own application. As a result, if restaurants and shops improved their service, they could earn high profits just by using the new technology. Finally, in the near future, people think companies will replace workers by relying on AI technologies, and that will cause many economic issues for citizens. Furthermore, if they lose their jobs, they will not cover their needs and expenses which leads to starvation. Because of that governments must control this development before damaging the future. To clarify my points in 2021 when Elon Musk had bought Twitter, he fired more than 65% of his employees because he could handle the whole of this International company without them by just relying on AI technology. Consequently, people around the world have experienced what Elon Musk did, and they have started to think cautiously about this development which can risk their careers. In conclusion, technologies are essential for growing companies' systems and services which are helpful for the customers to serve them without doing any little effort. However, it also has negative effects and may determine humanity's future. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Children these days are using gadgets like smartphones and tablets from an early age for both entertainment and education. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: It is true to say that teenagers rely heavily on electronic devices such as computers, laptops, smartphones and so on for entertainment and study purposes. While I acknowledge that there are some positive effects of this trend, I believe that the drawbacks of using gadgets at a young age outweigh their benefits. To begin with, there are many disadvantages to this phenomenon. In this modern era, offspring play online games for extended periods, consequently, adopting a sedentary lifestyle. Sitting for a long time in front of a computer or a laptop has a negative effect on their physical and mental development. Another drawback is that, due to the voice recognition and speech-to-text facilities, children are lacking in writing skills. These facilities enable spoken words to be automatically transcribed into written text on smartphones, tablets and various other electronic gadgets, In lieu of typing, youngsters prefer to use voice recognition for writing tasks. Hence, kids are becoming lazy too. It is common to observe that children often use electronic devices more for entertainment than for educational purposes. For example, in this contemporary society, there are many parents, who often complain that rather than using smartphones or tablets for education, their kids play online games or watch reels on social media. On the other hand, there are many advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads at a young age. Firstly, these types of digital devices can make lessons much more interesting. Children show more interest when they get a chance to study on electronic gadgets. Furthermore, students can do research using online resources. Thus, they can save time by finding information online instead of searching in books. Students also learn skills which are useful for their future jobs. For example, they learn to write reports using a word processor. To conclude, while there are certain advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads for education and entertainment, the disadvantages outweigh them and cannot be ignored.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Children these days are using gadgets like smartphones and tablets from an early age for both entertainment and education. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: It is true to say that teenagers rely heavily on electronic devices such as computers, laptops, smartphones and so on for entertainment and study purposes. While I acknowledge that there are some positive effects of this trend, I believe that the drawbacks of using gadgets at a young age outweigh their benefits. To begin with, there are many disadvantages to this phenomenon. In this modern era, offspring play online games for extended periods, consequently, adopting a sedentary lifestyle. Sitting for a long time in front of a computer or a laptop has a negative effect on their physical and mental development. Another drawback is that, due to the voice recognition and speech-to-text facilities, children are lacking in writing skills. These facilities enable spoken words to be automatically transcribed into written text on smartphones, tablets and various other electronic gadgets, In lieu of typing, youngsters prefer to use voice recognition for writing tasks. Hence, kids are becoming lazy too. It is common to observe that children often use electronic devices more for entertainment than for educational purposes. For example, in this contemporary society, there are many parents, who often complain that rather than using smartphones or tablets for education, their kids play online games or watch reels on social media. On the other hand, there are many advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads at a young age. Firstly, these types of digital devices can make lessons much more interesting. Children show more interest when they get a chance to study on electronic gadgets. Furthermore, students can do research using online resources. Thus, they can save time by finding information online instead of searching in books. Students also learn skills which are useful for their future jobs. For example, they learn to write reports using a word processor. To conclude, while there are certain advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads for education and entertainment, the disadvantages outweigh them and cannot be ignored. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Children these days are using gadgets like smartphones and tablets from an early age for both entertainment and education. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: It is true to say that teenagers rely heavily on electronic devices such as computers, laptops, smartphones and so on for entertainment and study purposes. While I acknowledge that there are some positive effects of this trend, I believe that the drawbacks of using gadgets at a young age outweigh their benefits. To begin with, there are many disadvantages to this phenomenon. In this modern era, offspring play online games for extended periods, consequently, adopting a sedentary lifestyle. Sitting for a long time in front of a computer or a laptop has a negative effect on their physical and mental development. Another drawback is that, due to the voice recognition and speech-to-text facilities, children are lacking in writing skills. These facilities enable spoken words to be automatically transcribed into written text on smartphones, tablets and various other electronic gadgets, In lieu of typing, youngsters prefer to use voice recognition for writing tasks. Hence, kids are becoming lazy too. It is common to observe that children often use electronic devices more for entertainment than for educational purposes. For example, in this contemporary society, there are many parents, who often complain that rather than using smartphones or tablets for education, their kids play online games or watch reels on social media. On the other hand, there are many advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads at a young age. Firstly, these types of digital devices can make lessons much more interesting. Children show more interest when they get a chance to study on electronic gadgets. Furthermore, students can do research using online resources. Thus, they can save time by finding information online instead of searching in books. Students also learn skills which are useful for their future jobs. For example, they learn to write reports using a word processor. To conclude, while there are certain advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads for education and entertainment, the disadvantages outweigh them and cannot be ignored.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Children these days are using gadgets like smartphones and tablets from an early age for both entertainment and education. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: It is true to say that teenagers rely heavily on electronic devices such as computers, laptops, smartphones and so on for entertainment and study purposes. While I acknowledge that there are some positive effects of this trend, I believe that the drawbacks of using gadgets at a young age outweigh their benefits. To begin with, there are many disadvantages to this phenomenon. In this modern era, offspring play online games for extended periods, consequently, adopting a sedentary lifestyle. Sitting for a long time in front of a computer or a laptop has a negative effect on their physical and mental development. Another drawback is that, due to the voice recognition and speech-to-text facilities, children are lacking in writing skills. These facilities enable spoken words to be automatically transcribed into written text on smartphones, tablets and various other electronic gadgets, In lieu of typing, youngsters prefer to use voice recognition for writing tasks. Hence, kids are becoming lazy too. It is common to observe that children often use electronic devices more for entertainment than for educational purposes. For example, in this contemporary society, there are many parents, who often complain that rather than using smartphones or tablets for education, their kids play online games or watch reels on social media. On the other hand, there are many advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads at a young age. Firstly, these types of digital devices can make lessons much more interesting. Children show more interest when they get a chance to study on electronic gadgets. Furthermore, students can do research using online resources. Thus, they can save time by finding information online instead of searching in books. Students also learn skills which are useful for their future jobs. For example, they learn to write reports using a word processor. To conclude, while there are certain advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads for education and entertainment, the disadvantages outweigh them and cannot be ignored. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Children these days are using gadgets like smartphones and tablets from an early age for both entertainment and education. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: It is true to say that teenagers rely heavily on electronic devices such as computers, laptops, smartphones and so on for entertainment and study purposes. While I acknowledge that there are some positive effects of this trend, I believe that the drawbacks of using gadgets at a young age outweigh their benefits. To begin with, there are many disadvantages to this phenomenon. In this modern era, offspring play online games for extended periods, consequently, adopting a sedentary lifestyle. Sitting for a long time in front of a computer or a laptop has a negative effect on their physical and mental development. Another drawback is that, due to the voice recognition and speech-to-text facilities, children are lacking in writing skills. These facilities enable spoken words to be automatically transcribed into written text on smartphones, tablets and various other electronic gadgets, In lieu of typing, youngsters prefer to use voice recognition for writing tasks. Hence, kids are becoming lazy too. It is common to observe that children often use electronic devices more for entertainment than for educational purposes. For example, in this contemporary society, there are many parents, who often complain that rather than using smartphones or tablets for education, their kids play online games or watch reels on social media. On the other hand, there are many advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads at a young age. Firstly, these types of digital devices can make lessons much more interesting. Children show more interest when they get a chance to study on electronic gadgets. Furthermore, students can do research using online resources. Thus, they can save time by finding information online instead of searching in books. Students also learn skills which are useful for their future jobs. For example, they learn to write reports using a word processor. To conclude, while there are certain advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads for education and entertainment, the disadvantages outweigh them and cannot be ignored.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Children these days are using gadgets like smartphones and tablets from an early age for both entertainment and education. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: It is true to say that teenagers rely heavily on electronic devices such as computers, laptops, smartphones and so on for entertainment and study purposes. While I acknowledge that there are some positive effects of this trend, I believe that the drawbacks of using gadgets at a young age outweigh their benefits. To begin with, there are many disadvantages to this phenomenon. In this modern era, offspring play online games for extended periods, consequently, adopting a sedentary lifestyle. Sitting for a long time in front of a computer or a laptop has a negative effect on their physical and mental development. Another drawback is that, due to the voice recognition and speech-to-text facilities, children are lacking in writing skills. These facilities enable spoken words to be automatically transcribed into written text on smartphones, tablets and various other electronic gadgets, In lieu of typing, youngsters prefer to use voice recognition for writing tasks. Hence, kids are becoming lazy too. It is common to observe that children often use electronic devices more for entertainment than for educational purposes. For example, in this contemporary society, there are many parents, who often complain that rather than using smartphones or tablets for education, their kids play online games or watch reels on social media. On the other hand, there are many advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads at a young age. Firstly, these types of digital devices can make lessons much more interesting. Children show more interest when they get a chance to study on electronic gadgets. Furthermore, students can do research using online resources. Thus, they can save time by finding information online instead of searching in books. Students also learn skills which are useful for their future jobs. For example, they learn to write reports using a word processor. To conclude, while there are certain advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads for education and entertainment, the disadvantages outweigh them and cannot be ignored. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Children these days are using gadgets like smartphones and tablets from an early age for both entertainment and education. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: It is true to say that teenagers rely heavily on electronic devices such as computers, laptops, smartphones and so on for entertainment and study purposes. While I acknowledge that there are some positive effects of this trend, I believe that the drawbacks of using gadgets at a young age outweigh their benefits. To begin with, there are many disadvantages to this phenomenon. In this modern era, offspring play online games for extended periods, consequently, adopting a sedentary lifestyle. Sitting for a long time in front of a computer or a laptop has a negative effect on their physical and mental development. Another drawback is that, due to the voice recognition and speech-to-text facilities, children are lacking in writing skills. These facilities enable spoken words to be automatically transcribed into written text on smartphones, tablets and various other electronic gadgets, In lieu of typing, youngsters prefer to use voice recognition for writing tasks. Hence, kids are becoming lazy too. It is common to observe that children often use electronic devices more for entertainment than for educational purposes. For example, in this contemporary society, there are many parents, who often complain that rather than using smartphones or tablets for education, their kids play online games or watch reels on social media. On the other hand, there are many advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads at a young age. Firstly, these types of digital devices can make lessons much more interesting. Children show more interest when they get a chance to study on electronic gadgets. Furthermore, students can do research using online resources. Thus, they can save time by finding information online instead of searching in books. Students also learn skills which are useful for their future jobs. For example, they learn to write reports using a word processor. To conclude, while there are certain advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads for education and entertainment, the disadvantages outweigh them and cannot be ignored.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Children these days are using gadgets like smartphones and tablets from an early age for both entertainment and education. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? Anwser: It is true to say that teenagers rely heavily on electronic devices such as computers, laptops, smartphones and so on for entertainment and study purposes. While I acknowledge that there are some positive effects of this trend, I believe that the drawbacks of using gadgets at a young age outweigh their benefits. To begin with, there are many disadvantages to this phenomenon. In this modern era, offspring play online games for extended periods, consequently, adopting a sedentary lifestyle. Sitting for a long time in front of a computer or a laptop has a negative effect on their physical and mental development. Another drawback is that, due to the voice recognition and speech-to-text facilities, children are lacking in writing skills. These facilities enable spoken words to be automatically transcribed into written text on smartphones, tablets and various other electronic gadgets, In lieu of typing, youngsters prefer to use voice recognition for writing tasks. Hence, kids are becoming lazy too. It is common to observe that children often use electronic devices more for entertainment than for educational purposes. For example, in this contemporary society, there are many parents, who often complain that rather than using smartphones or tablets for education, their kids play online games or watch reels on social media. On the other hand, there are many advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads at a young age. Firstly, these types of digital devices can make lessons much more interesting. Children show more interest when they get a chance to study on electronic gadgets. Furthermore, students can do research using online resources. Thus, they can save time by finding information online instead of searching in books. Students also learn skills which are useful for their future jobs. For example, they learn to write reports using a word processor. To conclude, while there are certain advantages to using mobile phones and digital pads for education and entertainment, the disadvantages outweigh them and cannot be ignored. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this? Anwser: While the level of happiness among citizens living in developing countries is rising, society in developed nations is reportedly becoming unhappier. This essay will elaborate on several reasons for this problem and suggest some lessons that can be learnt from this. On the one hand, there are two possible reasons attributed to this phenomenon. To begin with, due to economic progress, citizens living in underdeveloped nations are more satisfied with their lives. This is because economic growth is associated with the improvement in various domains such as healthcare, infrastructure and so on. Hence, individuals' basic necessities can be fulfilled which contributes to a better living standard for people. In contrast, this is not the case for society living in developed countries where they have to cope with the pressure of trying to succeed. A fast-paced life requires people to work around the clock with the aim of achieving desired goals. Consequently, individuals may find it difficult to balance their work with other aspects of life. They are more prone to chronic stress and burnout, which affect adversely both mental and physical well-being. On the other hand, there are two lessons that can be learnt from this issue. Chief of these is that holistic development of the economy plays a vital role in creating a happier life. If society's life is stable with advanced technology and connectivity, they can live without any worries over how to make ends meet. Therefore, citizens' stress can be significantly alleviated; which helps increase the level of well-being. Furthermore, balanced material progress with social connections and community engagement is also needed. By having a work-life balance, people are able to spend quality time with their family and friends in order to strengthen family bonds, which helps them enhance life satisfaction and happiness. In conclusion, economic development is a crucial reason leading to the happiness of less-developed countries, while the pressure of being successful triggers an unhappy life for those living in first-world nations. From this phenomenon, we can learn that both a comprehensively developed economy and work-life balance are of utmost importance factors to ensure people's well-being.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this? Anwser: While the level of happiness among citizens living in developing countries is rising, society in developed nations is reportedly becoming unhappier. This essay will elaborate on several reasons for this problem and suggest some lessons that can be learnt from this. On the one hand, there are two possible reasons attributed to this phenomenon. To begin with, due to economic progress, citizens living in underdeveloped nations are more satisfied with their lives. This is because economic growth is associated with the improvement in various domains such as healthcare, infrastructure and so on. Hence, individuals' basic necessities can be fulfilled which contributes to a better living standard for people. In contrast, this is not the case for society living in developed countries where they have to cope with the pressure of trying to succeed. A fast-paced life requires people to work around the clock with the aim of achieving desired goals. Consequently, individuals may find it difficult to balance their work with other aspects of life. They are more prone to chronic stress and burnout, which affect adversely both mental and physical well-being. On the other hand, there are two lessons that can be learnt from this issue. Chief of these is that holistic development of the economy plays a vital role in creating a happier life. If society's life is stable with advanced technology and connectivity, they can live without any worries over how to make ends meet. Therefore, citizens' stress can be significantly alleviated; which helps increase the level of well-being. Furthermore, balanced material progress with social connections and community engagement is also needed. By having a work-life balance, people are able to spend quality time with their family and friends in order to strengthen family bonds, which helps them enhance life satisfaction and happiness. In conclusion, economic development is a crucial reason leading to the happiness of less-developed countries, while the pressure of being successful triggers an unhappy life for those living in first-world nations. From this phenomenon, we can learn that both a comprehensively developed economy and work-life balance are of utmost importance factors to ensure people's well-being. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this? Anwser: While the level of happiness among citizens living in developing countries is rising, society in developed nations is reportedly becoming unhappier. This essay will elaborate on several reasons for this problem and suggest some lessons that can be learnt from this. On the one hand, there are two possible reasons attributed to this phenomenon. To begin with, due to economic progress, citizens living in underdeveloped nations are more satisfied with their lives. This is because economic growth is associated with the improvement in various domains such as healthcare, infrastructure and so on. Hence, individuals' basic necessities can be fulfilled which contributes to a better living standard for people. In contrast, this is not the case for society living in developed countries where they have to cope with the pressure of trying to succeed. A fast-paced life requires people to work around the clock with the aim of achieving desired goals. Consequently, individuals may find it difficult to balance their work with other aspects of life. They are more prone to chronic stress and burnout, which affect adversely both mental and physical well-being. On the other hand, there are two lessons that can be learnt from this issue. Chief of these is that holistic development of the economy plays a vital role in creating a happier life. If society's life is stable with advanced technology and connectivity, they can live without any worries over how to make ends meet. Therefore, citizens' stress can be significantly alleviated; which helps increase the level of well-being. Furthermore, balanced material progress with social connections and community engagement is also needed. By having a work-life balance, people are able to spend quality time with their family and friends in order to strengthen family bonds, which helps them enhance life satisfaction and happiness. In conclusion, economic development is a crucial reason leading to the happiness of less-developed countries, while the pressure of being successful triggers an unhappy life for those living in first-world nations. From this phenomenon, we can learn that both a comprehensively developed economy and work-life balance are of utmost importance factors to ensure people's well-being.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this? Anwser: While the level of happiness among citizens living in developing countries is rising, society in developed nations is reportedly becoming unhappier. This essay will elaborate on several reasons for this problem and suggest some lessons that can be learnt from this. On the one hand, there are two possible reasons attributed to this phenomenon. To begin with, due to economic progress, citizens living in underdeveloped nations are more satisfied with their lives. This is because economic growth is associated with the improvement in various domains such as healthcare, infrastructure and so on. Hence, individuals' basic necessities can be fulfilled which contributes to a better living standard for people. In contrast, this is not the case for society living in developed countries where they have to cope with the pressure of trying to succeed. A fast-paced life requires people to work around the clock with the aim of achieving desired goals. Consequently, individuals may find it difficult to balance their work with other aspects of life. They are more prone to chronic stress and burnout, which affect adversely both mental and physical well-being. On the other hand, there are two lessons that can be learnt from this issue. Chief of these is that holistic development of the economy plays a vital role in creating a happier life. If society's life is stable with advanced technology and connectivity, they can live without any worries over how to make ends meet. Therefore, citizens' stress can be significantly alleviated; which helps increase the level of well-being. Furthermore, balanced material progress with social connections and community engagement is also needed. By having a work-life balance, people are able to spend quality time with their family and friends in order to strengthen family bonds, which helps them enhance life satisfaction and happiness. In conclusion, economic development is a crucial reason leading to the happiness of less-developed countries, while the pressure of being successful triggers an unhappy life for those living in first-world nations. From this phenomenon, we can learn that both a comprehensively developed economy and work-life balance are of utmost importance factors to ensure people's well-being. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this? Anwser: While the level of happiness among citizens living in developing countries is rising, society in developed nations is reportedly becoming unhappier. This essay will elaborate on several reasons for this problem and suggest some lessons that can be learnt from this. On the one hand, there are two possible reasons attributed to this phenomenon. To begin with, due to economic progress, citizens living in underdeveloped nations are more satisfied with their lives. This is because economic growth is associated with the improvement in various domains such as healthcare, infrastructure and so on. Hence, individuals' basic necessities can be fulfilled which contributes to a better living standard for people. In contrast, this is not the case for society living in developed countries where they have to cope with the pressure of trying to succeed. A fast-paced life requires people to work around the clock with the aim of achieving desired goals. Consequently, individuals may find it difficult to balance their work with other aspects of life. They are more prone to chronic stress and burnout, which affect adversely both mental and physical well-being. On the other hand, there are two lessons that can be learnt from this issue. Chief of these is that holistic development of the economy plays a vital role in creating a happier life. If society's life is stable with advanced technology and connectivity, they can live without any worries over how to make ends meet. Therefore, citizens' stress can be significantly alleviated; which helps increase the level of well-being. Furthermore, balanced material progress with social connections and community engagement is also needed. By having a work-life balance, people are able to spend quality time with their family and friends in order to strengthen family bonds, which helps them enhance life satisfaction and happiness. In conclusion, economic development is a crucial reason leading to the happiness of less-developed countries, while the pressure of being successful triggers an unhappy life for those living in first-world nations. From this phenomenon, we can learn that both a comprehensively developed economy and work-life balance are of utmost importance factors to ensure people's well-being.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this? Anwser: While the level of happiness among citizens living in developing countries is rising, society in developed nations is reportedly becoming unhappier. This essay will elaborate on several reasons for this problem and suggest some lessons that can be learnt from this. On the one hand, there are two possible reasons attributed to this phenomenon. To begin with, due to economic progress, citizens living in underdeveloped nations are more satisfied with their lives. This is because economic growth is associated with the improvement in various domains such as healthcare, infrastructure and so on. Hence, individuals' basic necessities can be fulfilled which contributes to a better living standard for people. In contrast, this is not the case for society living in developed countries where they have to cope with the pressure of trying to succeed. A fast-paced life requires people to work around the clock with the aim of achieving desired goals. Consequently, individuals may find it difficult to balance their work with other aspects of life. They are more prone to chronic stress and burnout, which affect adversely both mental and physical well-being. On the other hand, there are two lessons that can be learnt from this issue. Chief of these is that holistic development of the economy plays a vital role in creating a happier life. If society's life is stable with advanced technology and connectivity, they can live without any worries over how to make ends meet. Therefore, citizens' stress can be significantly alleviated; which helps increase the level of well-being. Furthermore, balanced material progress with social connections and community engagement is also needed. By having a work-life balance, people are able to spend quality time with their family and friends in order to strengthen family bonds, which helps them enhance life satisfaction and happiness. In conclusion, economic development is a crucial reason leading to the happiness of less-developed countries, while the pressure of being successful triggers an unhappy life for those living in first-world nations. From this phenomenon, we can learn that both a comprehensively developed economy and work-life balance are of utmost importance factors to ensure people's well-being. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this? Anwser: While the level of happiness among citizens living in developing countries is rising, society in developed nations is reportedly becoming unhappier. This essay will elaborate on several reasons for this problem and suggest some lessons that can be learnt from this. On the one hand, there are two possible reasons attributed to this phenomenon. To begin with, due to economic progress, citizens living in underdeveloped nations are more satisfied with their lives. This is because economic growth is associated with the improvement in various domains such as healthcare, infrastructure and so on. Hence, individuals' basic necessities can be fulfilled which contributes to a better living standard for people. In contrast, this is not the case for society living in developed countries where they have to cope with the pressure of trying to succeed. A fast-paced life requires people to work around the clock with the aim of achieving desired goals. Consequently, individuals may find it difficult to balance their work with other aspects of life. They are more prone to chronic stress and burnout, which affect adversely both mental and physical well-being. On the other hand, there are two lessons that can be learnt from this issue. Chief of these is that holistic development of the economy plays a vital role in creating a happier life. If society's life is stable with advanced technology and connectivity, they can live without any worries over how to make ends meet. Therefore, citizens' stress can be significantly alleviated; which helps increase the level of well-being. Furthermore, balanced material progress with social connections and community engagement is also needed. By having a work-life balance, people are able to spend quality time with their family and friends in order to strengthen family bonds, which helps them enhance life satisfaction and happiness. In conclusion, economic development is a crucial reason leading to the happiness of less-developed countries, while the pressure of being successful triggers an unhappy life for those living in first-world nations. From this phenomenon, we can learn that both a comprehensively developed economy and work-life balance are of utmost importance factors to ensure people's well-being.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this? Anwser: While the level of happiness among citizens living in developing countries is rising, society in developed nations is reportedly becoming unhappier. This essay will elaborate on several reasons for this problem and suggest some lessons that can be learnt from this. On the one hand, there are two possible reasons attributed to this phenomenon. To begin with, due to economic progress, citizens living in underdeveloped nations are more satisfied with their lives. This is because economic growth is associated with the improvement in various domains such as healthcare, infrastructure and so on. Hence, individuals' basic necessities can be fulfilled which contributes to a better living standard for people. In contrast, this is not the case for society living in developed countries where they have to cope with the pressure of trying to succeed. A fast-paced life requires people to work around the clock with the aim of achieving desired goals. Consequently, individuals may find it difficult to balance their work with other aspects of life. They are more prone to chronic stress and burnout, which affect adversely both mental and physical well-being. On the other hand, there are two lessons that can be learnt from this issue. Chief of these is that holistic development of the economy plays a vital role in creating a happier life. If society's life is stable with advanced technology and connectivity, they can live without any worries over how to make ends meet. Therefore, citizens' stress can be significantly alleviated; which helps increase the level of well-being. Furthermore, balanced material progress with social connections and community engagement is also needed. By having a work-life balance, people are able to spend quality time with their family and friends in order to strengthen family bonds, which helps them enhance life satisfaction and happiness. In conclusion, economic development is a crucial reason leading to the happiness of less-developed countries, while the pressure of being successful triggers an unhappy life for those living in first-world nations. From this phenomenon, we can learn that both a comprehensively developed economy and work-life balance are of utmost importance factors to ensure people's well-being. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that young people should spend free time with families instead of outside entertainment, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: It is true that family has an indispensable role to play in one's growing process. Therefore, some individuals harbour a belief that young people have to divert their free time from outside amusement to families. This essay will delve into both perspectives in a comprehensive manner before explicating my position. Initially, one of the main arguments in its favour is that the time with families will be gradually reduced when growing up. Many people spend less time at home as their life circles expand. For example, some students move to another city for college. The main period of staying with families in one's life is usually from birth to teenage years. Moreover, this is a period which relies on the function of family the most since children need parents to take care of them and teenagers require support and guidance when encountering obstacles or being lost. At the other end of the spectrum, hanging out with friends for amusement is also vital to one's early life. It can not only build up a social network but also elevate personal visions by meeting different kinds of individuals and even learning some skills like attending sports teams. In addition, the connection with peers is an essential aspect ,especially at young ages which may influence the development of mental health. Besides the aforementioned, outside entertainment indeed brings some positive effects. To sum up, both viewpoints are compelling because the two factors are critical to constructing optimal growth. Thus, youngsters should divvy up their free time evenly so as to strike a balance between family and friendship. The front and centre is to cherish the people around.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that young people should spend free time with families instead of outside entertainment, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: It is true that family has an indispensable role to play in one's growing process. Therefore, some individuals harbour a belief that young people have to divert their free time from outside amusement to families. This essay will delve into both perspectives in a comprehensive manner before explicating my position. Initially, one of the main arguments in its favour is that the time with families will be gradually reduced when growing up. Many people spend less time at home as their life circles expand. For example, some students move to another city for college. The main period of staying with families in one's life is usually from birth to teenage years. Moreover, this is a period which relies on the function of family the most since children need parents to take care of them and teenagers require support and guidance when encountering obstacles or being lost. At the other end of the spectrum, hanging out with friends for amusement is also vital to one's early life. It can not only build up a social network but also elevate personal visions by meeting different kinds of individuals and even learning some skills like attending sports teams. In addition, the connection with peers is an essential aspect ,especially at young ages which may influence the development of mental health. Besides the aforementioned, outside entertainment indeed brings some positive effects. To sum up, both viewpoints are compelling because the two factors are critical to constructing optimal growth. Thus, youngsters should divvy up their free time evenly so as to strike a balance between family and friendship. The front and centre is to cherish the people around. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that young people should spend free time with families instead of outside entertainment, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: It is true that family has an indispensable role to play in one's growing process. Therefore, some individuals harbour a belief that young people have to divert their free time from outside amusement to families. This essay will delve into both perspectives in a comprehensive manner before explicating my position. Initially, one of the main arguments in its favour is that the time with families will be gradually reduced when growing up. Many people spend less time at home as their life circles expand. For example, some students move to another city for college. The main period of staying with families in one's life is usually from birth to teenage years. Moreover, this is a period which relies on the function of family the most since children need parents to take care of them and teenagers require support and guidance when encountering obstacles or being lost. At the other end of the spectrum, hanging out with friends for amusement is also vital to one's early life. It can not only build up a social network but also elevate personal visions by meeting different kinds of individuals and even learning some skills like attending sports teams. In addition, the connection with peers is an essential aspect ,especially at young ages which may influence the development of mental health. Besides the aforementioned, outside entertainment indeed brings some positive effects. To sum up, both viewpoints are compelling because the two factors are critical to constructing optimal growth. Thus, youngsters should divvy up their free time evenly so as to strike a balance between family and friendship. The front and centre is to cherish the people around.

Your lexical resource score is 8.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that young people should spend free time with families instead of outside entertainment, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: It is true that family has an indispensable role to play in one's growing process. Therefore, some individuals harbour a belief that young people have to divert their free time from outside amusement to families. This essay will delve into both perspectives in a comprehensive manner before explicating my position. Initially, one of the main arguments in its favour is that the time with families will be gradually reduced when growing up. Many people spend less time at home as their life circles expand. For example, some students move to another city for college. The main period of staying with families in one's life is usually from birth to teenage years. Moreover, this is a period which relies on the function of family the most since children need parents to take care of them and teenagers require support and guidance when encountering obstacles or being lost. At the other end of the spectrum, hanging out with friends for amusement is also vital to one's early life. It can not only build up a social network but also elevate personal visions by meeting different kinds of individuals and even learning some skills like attending sports teams. In addition, the connection with peers is an essential aspect ,especially at young ages which may influence the development of mental health. Besides the aforementioned, outside entertainment indeed brings some positive effects. To sum up, both viewpoints are compelling because the two factors are critical to constructing optimal growth. Thus, youngsters should divvy up their free time evenly so as to strike a balance between family and friendship. The front and centre is to cherish the people around. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 8.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that young people should spend free time with families instead of outside entertainment, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: It is true that family has an indispensable role to play in one's growing process. Therefore, some individuals harbour a belief that young people have to divert their free time from outside amusement to families. This essay will delve into both perspectives in a comprehensive manner before explicating my position. Initially, one of the main arguments in its favour is that the time with families will be gradually reduced when growing up. Many people spend less time at home as their life circles expand. For example, some students move to another city for college. The main period of staying with families in one's life is usually from birth to teenage years. Moreover, this is a period which relies on the function of family the most since children need parents to take care of them and teenagers require support and guidance when encountering obstacles or being lost. At the other end of the spectrum, hanging out with friends for amusement is also vital to one's early life. It can not only build up a social network but also elevate personal visions by meeting different kinds of individuals and even learning some skills like attending sports teams. In addition, the connection with peers is an essential aspect ,especially at young ages which may influence the development of mental health. Besides the aforementioned, outside entertainment indeed brings some positive effects. To sum up, both viewpoints are compelling because the two factors are critical to constructing optimal growth. Thus, youngsters should divvy up their free time evenly so as to strike a balance between family and friendship. The front and centre is to cherish the people around.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that young people should spend free time with families instead of outside entertainment, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: It is true that family has an indispensable role to play in one's growing process. Therefore, some individuals harbour a belief that young people have to divert their free time from outside amusement to families. This essay will delve into both perspectives in a comprehensive manner before explicating my position. Initially, one of the main arguments in its favour is that the time with families will be gradually reduced when growing up. Many people spend less time at home as their life circles expand. For example, some students move to another city for college. The main period of staying with families in one's life is usually from birth to teenage years. Moreover, this is a period which relies on the function of family the most since children need parents to take care of them and teenagers require support and guidance when encountering obstacles or being lost. At the other end of the spectrum, hanging out with friends for amusement is also vital to one's early life. It can not only build up a social network but also elevate personal visions by meeting different kinds of individuals and even learning some skills like attending sports teams. In addition, the connection with peers is an essential aspect ,especially at young ages which may influence the development of mental health. Besides the aforementioned, outside entertainment indeed brings some positive effects. To sum up, both viewpoints are compelling because the two factors are critical to constructing optimal growth. Thus, youngsters should divvy up their free time evenly so as to strike a balance between family and friendship. The front and centre is to cherish the people around. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that young people should spend free time with families instead of outside entertainment, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: It is true that family has an indispensable role to play in one's growing process. Therefore, some individuals harbour a belief that young people have to divert their free time from outside amusement to families. This essay will delve into both perspectives in a comprehensive manner before explicating my position. Initially, one of the main arguments in its favour is that the time with families will be gradually reduced when growing up. Many people spend less time at home as their life circles expand. For example, some students move to another city for college. The main period of staying with families in one's life is usually from birth to teenage years. Moreover, this is a period which relies on the function of family the most since children need parents to take care of them and teenagers require support and guidance when encountering obstacles or being lost. At the other end of the spectrum, hanging out with friends for amusement is also vital to one's early life. It can not only build up a social network but also elevate personal visions by meeting different kinds of individuals and even learning some skills like attending sports teams. In addition, the connection with peers is an essential aspect ,especially at young ages which may influence the development of mental health. Besides the aforementioned, outside entertainment indeed brings some positive effects. To sum up, both viewpoints are compelling because the two factors are critical to constructing optimal growth. Thus, youngsters should divvy up their free time evenly so as to strike a balance between family and friendship. The front and centre is to cherish the people around.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Some people think that young people should spend free time with families instead of outside entertainment, others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Anwser: It is true that family has an indispensable role to play in one's growing process. Therefore, some individuals harbour a belief that young people have to divert their free time from outside amusement to families. This essay will delve into both perspectives in a comprehensive manner before explicating my position. Initially, one of the main arguments in its favour is that the time with families will be gradually reduced when growing up. Many people spend less time at home as their life circles expand. For example, some students move to another city for college. The main period of staying with families in one's life is usually from birth to teenage years. Moreover, this is a period which relies on the function of family the most since children need parents to take care of them and teenagers require support and guidance when encountering obstacles or being lost. At the other end of the spectrum, hanging out with friends for amusement is also vital to one's early life. It can not only build up a social network but also elevate personal visions by meeting different kinds of individuals and even learning some skills like attending sports teams. In addition, the connection with peers is an essential aspect ,especially at young ages which may influence the development of mental health. Besides the aforementioned, outside entertainment indeed brings some positive effects. To sum up, both viewpoints are compelling because the two factors are critical to constructing optimal growth. Thus, youngsters should divvy up their free time evenly so as to strike a balance between family and friendship. The front and centre is to cherish the people around. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Improvements in technology that occurred in the distant past produced more positive effects than the developments that have occurred in the last few years. I completely agree with this statement and the following paragraphs shall outline the reasons for this belief. The early telephone completely revolutionized the way business was done and benefited humanity greatly. For the first ,time people could send messages long distances with ease and the pace of business increased dramatically making more people richer and creating more job opportunities. However, these days when the latest iPhone update comes out the only real shift has to do with fashion rather than providing any real new benefits. For example, now you can upload items to a ‘cloud’, or play more advanced games, but neither of these advancements in any way compares to the early time phones were released to the public. Similarly to the above, the early computers also transformed the way companies ran their businesses. Previously there were filing cabinets full of paperwork and accessing that information could take hours to locate the piece of information that you wanted. In ,contrast though, computers have been around for so long now that they have almost reached their limit in terms of how useful they could possibly be. For example, the only real modification that happens now is new releases of the Windows operating system and the so-called growth is actually just considered an annoying transformation to many rather than actual progress. In summary, the most profound long-lasting impacts that technology has brought us occurred many years ago. These days’ beneficial development now comes in very small increments and I believe that will continue to be the case in the future.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Improvements in technology that occurred in the distant past produced more positive effects than the developments that have occurred in the last few years. I completely agree with this statement and the following paragraphs shall outline the reasons for this belief. The early telephone completely revolutionized the way business was done and benefited humanity greatly. For the first ,time people could send messages long distances with ease and the pace of business increased dramatically making more people richer and creating more job opportunities. However, these days when the latest iPhone update comes out the only real shift has to do with fashion rather than providing any real new benefits. For example, now you can upload items to a ‘cloud’, or play more advanced games, but neither of these advancements in any way compares to the early time phones were released to the public. Similarly to the above, the early computers also transformed the way companies ran their businesses. Previously there were filing cabinets full of paperwork and accessing that information could take hours to locate the piece of information that you wanted. In ,contrast though, computers have been around for so long now that they have almost reached their limit in terms of how useful they could possibly be. For example, the only real modification that happens now is new releases of the Windows operating system and the so-called growth is actually just considered an annoying transformation to many rather than actual progress. In summary, the most profound long-lasting impacts that technology has brought us occurred many years ago. These days’ beneficial development now comes in very small increments and I believe that will continue to be the case in the future. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Improvements in technology that occurred in the distant past produced more positive effects than the developments that have occurred in the last few years. I completely agree with this statement and the following paragraphs shall outline the reasons for this belief. The early telephone completely revolutionized the way business was done and benefited humanity greatly. For the first ,time people could send messages long distances with ease and the pace of business increased dramatically making more people richer and creating more job opportunities. However, these days when the latest iPhone update comes out the only real shift has to do with fashion rather than providing any real new benefits. For example, now you can upload items to a ‘cloud’, or play more advanced games, but neither of these advancements in any way compares to the early time phones were released to the public. Similarly to the above, the early computers also transformed the way companies ran their businesses. Previously there were filing cabinets full of paperwork and accessing that information could take hours to locate the piece of information that you wanted. In ,contrast though, computers have been around for so long now that they have almost reached their limit in terms of how useful they could possibly be. For example, the only real modification that happens now is new releases of the Windows operating system and the so-called growth is actually just considered an annoying transformation to many rather than actual progress. In summary, the most profound long-lasting impacts that technology has brought us occurred many years ago. These days’ beneficial development now comes in very small increments and I believe that will continue to be the case in the future.

Your lexical resource score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Improvements in technology that occurred in the distant past produced more positive effects than the developments that have occurred in the last few years. I completely agree with this statement and the following paragraphs shall outline the reasons for this belief. The early telephone completely revolutionized the way business was done and benefited humanity greatly. For the first ,time people could send messages long distances with ease and the pace of business increased dramatically making more people richer and creating more job opportunities. However, these days when the latest iPhone update comes out the only real shift has to do with fashion rather than providing any real new benefits. For example, now you can upload items to a ‘cloud’, or play more advanced games, but neither of these advancements in any way compares to the early time phones were released to the public. Similarly to the above, the early computers also transformed the way companies ran their businesses. Previously there were filing cabinets full of paperwork and accessing that information could take hours to locate the piece of information that you wanted. In ,contrast though, computers have been around for so long now that they have almost reached their limit in terms of how useful they could possibly be. For example, the only real modification that happens now is new releases of the Windows operating system and the so-called growth is actually just considered an annoying transformation to many rather than actual progress. In summary, the most profound long-lasting impacts that technology has brought us occurred many years ago. These days’ beneficial development now comes in very small increments and I believe that will continue to be the case in the future. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Improvements in technology that occurred in the distant past produced more positive effects than the developments that have occurred in the last few years. I completely agree with this statement and the following paragraphs shall outline the reasons for this belief. The early telephone completely revolutionized the way business was done and benefited humanity greatly. For the first ,time people could send messages long distances with ease and the pace of business increased dramatically making more people richer and creating more job opportunities. However, these days when the latest iPhone update comes out the only real shift has to do with fashion rather than providing any real new benefits. For example, now you can upload items to a ‘cloud’, or play more advanced games, but neither of these advancements in any way compares to the early time phones were released to the public. Similarly to the above, the early computers also transformed the way companies ran their businesses. Previously there were filing cabinets full of paperwork and accessing that information could take hours to locate the piece of information that you wanted. In ,contrast though, computers have been around for so long now that they have almost reached their limit in terms of how useful they could possibly be. For example, the only real modification that happens now is new releases of the Windows operating system and the so-called growth is actually just considered an annoying transformation to many rather than actual progress. In summary, the most profound long-lasting impacts that technology has brought us occurred many years ago. These days’ beneficial development now comes in very small increments and I believe that will continue to be the case in the future.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Improvements in technology that occurred in the distant past produced more positive effects than the developments that have occurred in the last few years. I completely agree with this statement and the following paragraphs shall outline the reasons for this belief. The early telephone completely revolutionized the way business was done and benefited humanity greatly. For the first ,time people could send messages long distances with ease and the pace of business increased dramatically making more people richer and creating more job opportunities. However, these days when the latest iPhone update comes out the only real shift has to do with fashion rather than providing any real new benefits. For example, now you can upload items to a ‘cloud’, or play more advanced games, but neither of these advancements in any way compares to the early time phones were released to the public. Similarly to the above, the early computers also transformed the way companies ran their businesses. Previously there were filing cabinets full of paperwork and accessing that information could take hours to locate the piece of information that you wanted. In ,contrast though, computers have been around for so long now that they have almost reached their limit in terms of how useful they could possibly be. For example, the only real modification that happens now is new releases of the Windows operating system and the so-called growth is actually just considered an annoying transformation to many rather than actual progress. In summary, the most profound long-lasting impacts that technology has brought us occurred many years ago. These days’ beneficial development now comes in very small increments and I believe that will continue to be the case in the future. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Improvements in technology that occurred in the distant past produced more positive effects than the developments that have occurred in the last few years. I completely agree with this statement and the following paragraphs shall outline the reasons for this belief. The early telephone completely revolutionized the way business was done and benefited humanity greatly. For the first ,time people could send messages long distances with ease and the pace of business increased dramatically making more people richer and creating more job opportunities. However, these days when the latest iPhone update comes out the only real shift has to do with fashion rather than providing any real new benefits. For example, now you can upload items to a ‘cloud’, or play more advanced games, but neither of these advancements in any way compares to the early time phones were released to the public. Similarly to the above, the early computers also transformed the way companies ran their businesses. Previously there were filing cabinets full of paperwork and accessing that information could take hours to locate the piece of information that you wanted. In ,contrast though, computers have been around for so long now that they have almost reached their limit in terms of how useful they could possibly be. For example, the only real modification that happens now is new releases of the Windows operating system and the so-called growth is actually just considered an annoying transformation to many rather than actual progress. In summary, the most profound long-lasting impacts that technology has brought us occurred many years ago. These days’ beneficial development now comes in very small increments and I believe that will continue to be the case in the future.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: Earlier technological developments brought more benefits and changed the lives of ordinary people more than recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Improvements in technology that occurred in the distant past produced more positive effects than the developments that have occurred in the last few years. I completely agree with this statement and the following paragraphs shall outline the reasons for this belief. The early telephone completely revolutionized the way business was done and benefited humanity greatly. For the first ,time people could send messages long distances with ease and the pace of business increased dramatically making more people richer and creating more job opportunities. However, these days when the latest iPhone update comes out the only real shift has to do with fashion rather than providing any real new benefits. For example, now you can upload items to a ‘cloud’, or play more advanced games, but neither of these advancements in any way compares to the early time phones were released to the public. Similarly to the above, the early computers also transformed the way companies ran their businesses. Previously there were filing cabinets full of paperwork and accessing that information could take hours to locate the piece of information that you wanted. In ,contrast though, computers have been around for so long now that they have almost reached their limit in terms of how useful they could possibly be. For example, the only real modification that happens now is new releases of the Windows operating system and the so-called growth is actually just considered an annoying transformation to many rather than actual progress. In summary, the most profound long-lasting impacts that technology has brought us occurred many years ago. These days’ beneficial development now comes in very small increments and I believe that will continue to be the case in the future. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuel should be the most important global priority today. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Owing to the rampant growth of the population, a significant amount of environmental concerns can be seen all over the world. Despite using fossil fuels other alternative solutions should be considered. I completely agree with the given phenomenon, since the depletion and burning of exhaustible resources bring about many negative ramifications such as global warming and wild animal extinction. To begin with, reckless consumption of fossil fuels may widen many issues. Firstly, global warming is the paramount concern of that. To be more precise, burning fossil fuels directly influences global warming. If global warming rises, it directs greenhouse effects. For example, recent research reveals that air pollution has risen drastically over the past decade. Hence, it is better to research other safe alternatives. Secondly, some wild animals are on the brink of extinction due to the burning of fossil fuels. Furthermore, burning fossil fuels may affect animal's habitats. Moreover, if global warming rises, the sea levels go up and affect fish and some other organisms. For instance, a study which was done by the Ministry of Environment shows that approximately 40 wild animals and some types of fish have been on the brink of extinction over the last 5 years. Therefore, investigation of other resources is a need of the day. In conclusion, nowadays, it is believed that giving priority to the development of safe alternatives rather than fossil fuels is a crucial thing. I totally would argue with the given statement, since depletion of fossil fuels ushers global warming and wild animals' extinction. It is recommended that the government should impose stringent legislation to curb unwanted consumption of exhaustible resources and should subsidize the development of other alternatives.

Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5 Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuel should be the most important global priority today. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Owing to the rampant growth of the population, a significant amount of environmental concerns can be seen all over the world. Despite using fossil fuels other alternative solutions should be considered. I completely agree with the given phenomenon, since the depletion and burning of exhaustible resources bring about many negative ramifications such as global warming and wild animal extinction. To begin with, reckless consumption of fossil fuels may widen many issues. Firstly, global warming is the paramount concern of that. To be more precise, burning fossil fuels directly influences global warming. If global warming rises, it directs greenhouse effects. For example, recent research reveals that air pollution has risen drastically over the past decade. Hence, it is better to research other safe alternatives. Secondly, some wild animals are on the brink of extinction due to the burning of fossil fuels. Furthermore, burning fossil fuels may affect animal's habitats. Moreover, if global warming rises, the sea levels go up and affect fish and some other organisms. For instance, a study which was done by the Ministry of Environment shows that approximately 40 wild animals and some types of fish have been on the brink of extinction over the last 5 years. Therefore, investigation of other resources is a need of the day. In conclusion, nowadays, it is believed that giving priority to the development of safe alternatives rather than fossil fuels is a crucial thing. I totally would argue with the given statement, since depletion of fossil fuels ushers global warming and wild animals' extinction. It is recommended that the government should impose stringent legislation to curb unwanted consumption of exhaustible resources and should subsidize the development of other alternatives. [/INST]Your coherence and cohesion score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuel should be the most important global priority today. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Owing to the rampant growth of the population, a significant amount of environmental concerns can be seen all over the world. Despite using fossil fuels other alternative solutions should be considered. I completely agree with the given phenomenon, since the depletion and burning of exhaustible resources bring about many negative ramifications such as global warming and wild animal extinction. To begin with, reckless consumption of fossil fuels may widen many issues. Firstly, global warming is the paramount concern of that. To be more precise, burning fossil fuels directly influences global warming. If global warming rises, it directs greenhouse effects. For example, recent research reveals that air pollution has risen drastically over the past decade. Hence, it is better to research other safe alternatives. Secondly, some wild animals are on the brink of extinction due to the burning of fossil fuels. Furthermore, burning fossil fuels may affect animal's habitats. Moreover, if global warming rises, the sea levels go up and affect fish and some other organisms. For instance, a study which was done by the Ministry of Environment shows that approximately 40 wild animals and some types of fish have been on the brink of extinction over the last 5 years. Therefore, investigation of other resources is a need of the day. In conclusion, nowadays, it is believed that giving priority to the development of safe alternatives rather than fossil fuels is a crucial thing. I totally would argue with the given statement, since depletion of fossil fuels ushers global warming and wild animals' extinction. It is recommended that the government should impose stringent legislation to curb unwanted consumption of exhaustible resources and should subsidize the development of other alternatives.

Your lexical resource score is 7.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5 Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuel should be the most important global priority today. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Owing to the rampant growth of the population, a significant amount of environmental concerns can be seen all over the world. Despite using fossil fuels other alternative solutions should be considered. I completely agree with the given phenomenon, since the depletion and burning of exhaustible resources bring about many negative ramifications such as global warming and wild animal extinction. To begin with, reckless consumption of fossil fuels may widen many issues. Firstly, global warming is the paramount concern of that. To be more precise, burning fossil fuels directly influences global warming. If global warming rises, it directs greenhouse effects. For example, recent research reveals that air pollution has risen drastically over the past decade. Hence, it is better to research other safe alternatives. Secondly, some wild animals are on the brink of extinction due to the burning of fossil fuels. Furthermore, burning fossil fuels may affect animal's habitats. Moreover, if global warming rises, the sea levels go up and affect fish and some other organisms. For instance, a study which was done by the Ministry of Environment shows that approximately 40 wild animals and some types of fish have been on the brink of extinction over the last 5 years. Therefore, investigation of other resources is a need of the day. In conclusion, nowadays, it is believed that giving priority to the development of safe alternatives rather than fossil fuels is a crucial thing. I totally would argue with the given statement, since depletion of fossil fuels ushers global warming and wild animals' extinction. It is recommended that the government should impose stringent legislation to curb unwanted consumption of exhaustible resources and should subsidize the development of other alternatives. [/INST]Your lexical resource score is 7.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuel should be the most important global priority today. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Owing to the rampant growth of the population, a significant amount of environmental concerns can be seen all over the world. Despite using fossil fuels other alternative solutions should be considered. I completely agree with the given phenomenon, since the depletion and burning of exhaustible resources bring about many negative ramifications such as global warming and wild animal extinction. To begin with, reckless consumption of fossil fuels may widen many issues. Firstly, global warming is the paramount concern of that. To be more precise, burning fossil fuels directly influences global warming. If global warming rises, it directs greenhouse effects. For example, recent research reveals that air pollution has risen drastically over the past decade. Hence, it is better to research other safe alternatives. Secondly, some wild animals are on the brink of extinction due to the burning of fossil fuels. Furthermore, burning fossil fuels may affect animal's habitats. Moreover, if global warming rises, the sea levels go up and affect fish and some other organisms. For instance, a study which was done by the Ministry of Environment shows that approximately 40 wild animals and some types of fish have been on the brink of extinction over the last 5 years. Therefore, investigation of other resources is a need of the day. In conclusion, nowadays, it is believed that giving priority to the development of safe alternatives rather than fossil fuels is a crucial thing. I totally would argue with the given statement, since depletion of fossil fuels ushers global warming and wild animals' extinction. It is recommended that the government should impose stringent legislation to curb unwanted consumption of exhaustible resources and should subsidize the development of other alternatives.

Your grammatical range score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5 Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuel should be the most important global priority today. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Owing to the rampant growth of the population, a significant amount of environmental concerns can be seen all over the world. Despite using fossil fuels other alternative solutions should be considered. I completely agree with the given phenomenon, since the depletion and burning of exhaustible resources bring about many negative ramifications such as global warming and wild animal extinction. To begin with, reckless consumption of fossil fuels may widen many issues. Firstly, global warming is the paramount concern of that. To be more precise, burning fossil fuels directly influences global warming. If global warming rises, it directs greenhouse effects. For example, recent research reveals that air pollution has risen drastically over the past decade. Hence, it is better to research other safe alternatives. Secondly, some wild animals are on the brink of extinction due to the burning of fossil fuels. Furthermore, burning fossil fuels may affect animal's habitats. Moreover, if global warming rises, the sea levels go up and affect fish and some other organisms. For instance, a study which was done by the Ministry of Environment shows that approximately 40 wild animals and some types of fish have been on the brink of extinction over the last 5 years. Therefore, investigation of other resources is a need of the day. In conclusion, nowadays, it is believed that giving priority to the development of safe alternatives rather than fossil fuels is a crucial thing. I totally would argue with the given statement, since depletion of fossil fuels ushers global warming and wild animals' extinction. It is recommended that the government should impose stringent legislation to curb unwanted consumption of exhaustible resources and should subsidize the development of other alternatives. [/INST]Your grammatical range score is 9.0</s>

You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuel should be the most important global priority today. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Owing to the rampant growth of the population, a significant amount of environmental concerns can be seen all over the world. Despite using fossil fuels other alternative solutions should be considered. I completely agree with the given phenomenon, since the depletion and burning of exhaustible resources bring about many negative ramifications such as global warming and wild animal extinction. To begin with, reckless consumption of fossil fuels may widen many issues. Firstly, global warming is the paramount concern of that. To be more precise, burning fossil fuels directly influences global warming. If global warming rises, it directs greenhouse effects. For example, recent research reveals that air pollution has risen drastically over the past decade. Hence, it is better to research other safe alternatives. Secondly, some wild animals are on the brink of extinction due to the burning of fossil fuels. Furthermore, burning fossil fuels may affect animal's habitats. Moreover, if global warming rises, the sea levels go up and affect fish and some other organisms. For instance, a study which was done by the Ministry of Environment shows that approximately 40 wild animals and some types of fish have been on the brink of extinction over the last 5 years. Therefore, investigation of other resources is a need of the day. In conclusion, nowadays, it is believed that giving priority to the development of safe alternatives rather than fossil fuels is a crucial thing. I totally would argue with the given statement, since depletion of fossil fuels ushers global warming and wild animals' extinction. It is recommended that the government should impose stringent legislation to curb unwanted consumption of exhaustible resources and should subsidize the development of other alternatives.

Your task achievement score is 9.0

<s>[INST] You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0] The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5 Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay: Question: The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuel should be the most important global priority today. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Anwser: Owing to the rampant growth of the population, a significant amount of environmental concerns can be seen all over the world. Despite using fossil fuels other alternative solutions should be considered. I completely agree with the given phenomenon, since the depletion and burning of exhaustible resources bring about many negative ramifications such as global warming and wild animal extinction. To begin with, reckless consumption of fossil fuels may widen many issues. Firstly, global warming is the paramount concern of that. To be more precise, burning fossil fuels directly influences global warming. If global warming rises, it directs greenhouse effects. For example, recent research reveals that air pollution has risen drastically over the past decade. Hence, it is better to research other safe alternatives. Secondly, some wild animals are on the brink of extinction due to the burning of fossil fuels. Furthermore, burning fossil fuels may affect animal's habitats. Moreover, if global warming rises, the sea levels go up and affect fish and some other organisms. For instance, a study which was done by the Ministry of Environment shows that approximately 40 wild animals and some types of fish have been on the brink of extinction over the last 5 years. Therefore, investigation of other resources is a need of the day. In conclusion, nowadays, it is believed that giving priority to the development of safe alternatives rather than fossil fuels is a crucial thing. I totally would argue with the given statement, since depletion of fossil fuels ushers global warming and wild animals' extinction. It is recommended that the government should impose stringent legislation to curb unwanted consumption of exhaustible resources and should subsidize the development of other alternatives. [/INST]Your task achievement score is 9.0</s>