instruction
stringlengths
1
84
input
stringlengths
1
85
output
stringlengths
1
83
(f) Joint Committee on Fertilizer Pricing
(g) Joint Committee to Enquire into Irregularities in
Securities and Banking Transactions
(h) Joint Committee on Stock Market Scam
(i) Joint Committee on Security in Parliament Complex
(j) Committee on Provision of Computers to Members of
Parliament, Offices of Political Parties and Officers of the
Lok Sabha Secretariat
(k) Committee on Food Management in Parliament House
Complex
(l) Committee on Installation of Portraits / Statues of
National Leaders and Parliamentarians in Parliament
House Complex
(m) Joint Committee on Maintenance of Heritage Character
and Development of Parliament House Complex
(n) Committee on Violation of Protocol Norms and
Contemptuous Behaviour of Government Officers with
Members of Lok Sabha
(o) Joint Committee to Examine Matters Relating to
Allocation and Pricing of Telecom Licences and
Spectrum
2. Advisory Committees include select or joint committees on
bills, which are appointed to consider and report on
particular bills. These committees are distinguishable from
the other ad hoc committees in as much as they are
concerned with bills and the procedure to be followed by
them is laid down in the Rules of Procedure and the
Directions by the Speaker / Chairman.
When a Bill comes up before a House for general discussion, it
is open to that House to refer it to a Select Committee of the
House or a Joint Committee of the two Houses. A motion to this
effect has to be moved and adopted in the House in which the Bill
comes up for consideration. In case the motion adopted is for
reference of the Bill to a Joint Committee, the decision is
conveyed to the other House, requesting the members to
nominate members of the other House to serve on the Committee.
The Select or Joint Committee considers the Bill clause by
clause just as the two Houses do. Amendments to various clauses
can be moved by members of the Committee. The Committee can
also take evidence of associations, public bodies or experts who
are interested in the Bill. After the Bill has thus been considered,
the Committee submits its report to the House. Members who do
FINANCIAL COMMITTEES
Public Accounts Committee
This committee was set up first in 1921 under the provisions of the
Government of India Act of 1919 and has since been in existence.
At present, it consists of 22 members (15 from the Lok Sabha and
7 from the Rajya Sabha). The members are elected by the
Parliament every year from amongst its members according to the
principle of proportional representation by means of the single
transferable vote. Thus, all parties get due representation in it.
The term of office of the members is one year. A minister cannot
be elected as a member of the committee. The chairman of the
committee is appointed from amongst its members by the
Speaker. Until 1966 - ‘67, the chairman of the committee belonged
to the ruling party. However, since 1967 a convention has
developed whereby the chairman of the committee is selected
invariably from the Opposition.
The function of the committee is to examine the annual audit
reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG),
which are laid before the Parliament by the President. The CAG
submits three audit reports to the President, namely, audit report
on appropriation accounts, audit report on finance accounts and
audit report on public undertakings.
The committee examines public expenditure not only from legal
and formal point of view to discover technical irregularities but
also from the point of view of economy, prudence, wisdom and
propriety to bring out the cases of waste, loss, corruption,
extravagance, inefficiency and nugatory expenses.
In more detail, the functions of the committee are:
1. To examine the appropriation accounts and the finance
accounts of the Union government and any other accounts
laid before the Lok Sabha. The appropriation accounts
compare the actual expenditure with the expenditure
sanctioned by the Parliament through the Appropriation Act,
2. In scrutinising the appropriation accounts and the audit
report of CAG on it, the committee has to satisfy itself that
(a) The money that has been disbursed was legally
available for the applied service or purpose
(b) The expenditure conforms to the authority that governs it
(c) Every re-appropriation has been made in accordance
with the related rules
3. To examine the accounts of state corporations, trading
concerns and manufacturing projects and the audit report of
CAG on them (except those public undertakings which are
allotted to the Committee on Public Undertakings)
4. To examine the accounts of autonomous and semi-
autonomous bodies, the audit of which is conducted by the
CAG
5. To consider the report of the CAG relating to the audit of any
receipt or to examine the accounts of stores and stocks
6. To examine the money spent on any service during a
financial year in excess of the amount granted by the Lok
Sabha for that purpose
In the fulfillment of the above functions, the committee is
assisted by the CAG. In fact, the CAG acts as a guide, friend and
philosopher of the committee.
On the role played by the committee, Ashok Chanda (who
himself has been a CAG of India) observed: “Over a period of
years, the committee has entirely fulfilled the expectation that it
should develop into a powerful force in the control of public
expenditure. It may be claimed that the traditions established and
conventions developed by the Public Accounts Committee
conform to the highest traditions of a parliamentary democracy.”5
However, the effectiveness of the role of the committee is
limited by the following:
(a) It is not concerned with the questions of policy in broader
sense.
(b) It conducts a post-mortem examination of accounts (showing
the expenditure already incurred).
(c) It cannot intervene in the matters of day-to-day
(d) Its recommendations are advisory and not binding on the
ministries.
(e) It is not vested with the power of disallowance of
expenditures by the departments.
(f) It is not an executive body and hence, cannot issue an order.
Only the Parliament can take a final decision on its findings.
Estimates Committee
The origin of this committee can be traced to the standing
financial committee set up in 1921. The first Estimates Committee
in the post-independence era was constituted in 1950 on the
recommendation of John Mathai, the then finance minister.
Originally, it had 25 members but in 1956 its membership was
raised to 30. All the thirty members are from Lok Sabha only. The
Rajya Sabha has no representation in this committee. These
members are elected by the Lok Sabha every year from amongst
its own members, according to the principles of proportional
representation by means of a single transferable vote. Thus, all
parties get due representation in it. The term of office is one year.
A minister cannot be elected as a member of the committee. The
chairman of the committee is appointed by the Speaker from
amongst its members and he is invariably from the ruling party.
The function of the committee is to examine the estimates
included in the budget and suggest ‘economies’ in public
expenditure. Hence, it has been described as a ‘continuous
economy committee’.
In more detail, the functions of the committee are:
1. To report what economies, improvements in organisation,
efficiency and administrative reform consistent with the
policy underlying the estimates, can be affected
2. To suggest alternative policies in order to bring about
efficiency and economy in administration
3. To examine whether the money is well laid out within the
limits of the policy implied in the estimates
4. To suggest the form in which the estimates are to be
presented to Parliament
The Committee shall not exercise its functions in relation to
Public Undertakings. The Committee may continue the
examination of the estimates from time to time, throughout the
financial year and report to the House as its examination
proceeds. It shall not be incumbent on the Committee to examine
the entire estimates of any one year. The demands for grants may
be finally voted despite the fact that the Committee has made no
report.
However, the effectiveness of the role of the committee is
limited by the following:
(a) It examines the budget estimates only after they have been
voted by the Parliament, and not before that.
(b) It cannot question the policy laid down by the Parliament.
(c) Its recommendations are advisory and not binding on the
ministries.
(d) It examines every year only certain selected ministries and
departments. Thus, by rotation, it would cover all of them
over a number of years.
(e) It lacks the expert assistance of the CAG which is available
to the Public Accounts Committee.
(f) Its work is in the nature of a postmortem.
Committee on Public Undertakings
This committee was created in 1964 on the recommendation of
the Krishna Menon Committee. Originally, it had 15 members (10
from the Lok Sabha and 5 from the Rajya Sabha). However, in
1974, its membership was raised to 22 (15 from the Lok Sabha
and 7 from the Rajya Sabha). The members of this committee are
elected by the Parliament every year from amongst its own
members according to the principle of proportional representation
by means of a single transferable vote. Thus, all parties get due
representation in it. The term of office of the members is one year.
A minister cannot be elected as a member of the committee. The
chairman of the committee is appointed by the Speaker from
amongst its members who are drawn from the Lok Sabha only.
Thus, the members of the committee who are from the Rajya
Sabha cannot be appointed as the chairman.
The functions of the committee are:
2. To examine the reports of the Comptroller and Auditor
General on public undertakings
3. To examine (in the context of autonomy and efficiency of
public undertakings) whether the affairs of the public
undertakings are being managed in accordance with sound
business principles and prudent commercial practices
4. To exercise such other functions vested in the public
accounts committee and the estimates committee in relation
to public undertakings which are allotted to it by the Speaker
from time to time
The committee is not to examine and investigate any of the
following:
(i) Matters of major government policy as distinct from business
or commercial functions of the public undertakings
(ii) Matters of day-to-day administration
(iii) Matters for the consideration of which machinery is
established by any special statute under which a particular
public undertaking is established
Further, the effectiveness of the role of the committee is limited
by the following:
(a) It cannot take up the examination of more than ten to
twelve public undertakings in a year.
(b) Its work is in the nature of a post-mortem.
(c) It does not look into technical matters as its members
are not technical experts.
(d) Its recommendations are advisory and not binding on
the ministries.
DEPARTMENTAL STANDING COMMITTEES
On the recommendation of the Rules Committee of the Lok
Sabha, 17 Departmentally-Related Standing Committees
(DRSCs) were set up in the Parliament in 1993.6 In 2004, seven
more such committees were setup, thus increasing their number
from 17 to 24.
The main objective of the standing committees is to secure
more accountability of the Executive (i.e., the Council of Ministers)
to the Parliament, particularly financial accountability. They also
assist the Parliament in debating the budget more effectively.7
The 24 standing committees cover under their jurisdiction all
the ministries / departments of the Central Government.
Each standing committee consists of 31 members (21 from Lok
Sabha and 10 from Rajya Sabha). The members of the Lok
Sabha are nominated by the Speaker from amongst its own
members, just as the members of the Rajya Sabha are nominated
by the Chairman from amongst its members.8
A minister is not eligible to be nominated as a member of any of
the standing committees. In case a member, after his nomination
to any of the standing committees, is appointed a minister, he then
ceases to be a member of the committee.
The term of office of each standing committee is one year from
the date of its constitution.
Out of the 24 standing committees, 8 work under the Rajya
Sabha and 16 under the Lok Sabha.9
The 24 standing committees and the ministries / departments
placed under their jurisdiction are shown below in Table 23.1.
The functions of each of the standing committees are:
1. To consider the demands for grants of the concerned
ministries / departments before they are discussed and
voted in the Lok Sabha. Its report should not suggest
anything of the nature of cut motions
2. To examine bills pertaining to the concerned ministries /
4. To consider national basic long-term policy documents
presented to the Houses
The following limitations are imposed on the functioning of
these standing committees:
(i) They should not consider the matters of day-to-day
administration of the concerned ministries / departments.
Table 23.1 Departmental Standing Committees and their
Jurisdiction (2019)
Sl.No. Name of the Committees Ministries / Departments
Covered
I. Committees under Rajya Sabha
1. Committee on Commerce Commerce and Industry
2. Committee on Home Affairs (1) Home Affairs
(2) Development of North-
Eastern Region
3. Committee on Human (1) Human Resource
Resource Development Development
(2) Youth Affairs and
Sports
(3) Women and Child
Development
4. Committee on Industry (1) Heavy Industries and
Public Enterprises
(2) Micro, Small and
Medium Enterprises
5. Committee on Science & (1) Science and
Technology, Environment & Technology
Forests (2) Space
(3) Earth Sciences
(4) Atomic Energy
(5) Environment, Forests
and Climate Change
6. Committee on Transport, (1) Civil Aviation
(2) Road Transport &
Highways
(3) Shipping
(4) Culture
(5) Tourism
7. Committee on Health & (1) Health and Family
Family Welfare Welfare
(2) Ayurveda, Yoga and
Naturopathy, Unani,
Siddha and
Homoeopathy (AYUSH)
8. Committee on Personnel, (1) Law and Justice
Public Grievances, Law and (2) Personnel, Public
Justice Grievances and
Pensions
II. Committees under Lok Sabha
9. Committee on Agriculture (1) Agriculture and
Farmers’ Welfare
(2) Fisheries, Animal
Husbandry and Dairing
(3) Food Processing
Industries
10. Committee on Information (1) Communication
Technology (2) Electronics &