text
stringlengths 0
6.44k
|
---|
Population density is used as an encouraging criterion in order to determine the areas which will likely need more accommodations to support its population. Although not of great importance to environmental concerns, it is valued for its use in |
effective planning purposes. In the district |
focused on in this study, there was a significant difference in population densities |
across counties. Furthermore, the only |
county to satisfy the encouraging criteria |
of density above 10 per square mile and |
density above 20 was Palm Beach. |
By determining which developable |
residential lands that had a rank of 1 |
across aforementioned encouraging criteria intersected with the most preferred |
population density, the final set of absolute |
most preferred sites for development |
based on the goal of this analysis were determined. |
Population Density in District 4 Most Suitable Land Based on All Criteria |
Proximity to Roads Analysis Proximity to Developed Residential Lands |
Analysis |
Image (above) Urban development in Palm Beach |
County has had a negative impact on the Everglades ecosystem. |
Annalisa Gutierrez |
12/10/2008 |
UEP 232 |
Source: Florida Geographic Data Library (FGDL.org) |
Projection—Albers Conical Equal Area |
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.fas.org/irp/imint/docs/rst/ |
Sect3/evergladesC.jpg&imgrefurl=http |
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.fas.org/irp/imint/docs/rst/Sect3/ |
Source: Wikipedia.rg |
Image (Below): Land cover |
change between 1900 and 1992 has |
shown a drastic change from primarily wetlands and wooded areas |
to primarily farming and residential uses. |
Encouraging Criteria: Proximity to Densely Populated Areas |
Proximity to already existing infrastructure such |
as roads plays an important role in site suitability analysis. Roads are essential for urban life, |
and a crucial component of future development. |
If development occurs in areas lacking developed roads infrastructure, a roads system must |
be constructed which eventually links with existing roads. The construction of roads has had |
a notable negative effect on the Everglades ecosystem. Thus, in order to minimize such damage, developable lands were ranked based on |
proximity to roads. Areas within 300 ft of roads |
were most preferred and designated a value of |
1, 300-500 a value of 2, and above 500 a value |
of 3. |
Suitability of land for development is a function of its |
proximity to already developed areas. Because developed areas already have the structures necessary to |
support residential life, opting to carry out new development near already existing development deters the |
need for additional construction of critical structures |
such as sewage treatment facilities, cable lines, and |
power plants. Since minimizing construction not only |
decreases cost but also environmental impacts, it was |
included as an important encouraging criteria. Evaluating land based on this criterion will also help prevent |
the problem of urban sprawl, which has been cited as a |
cause of Everglades degradation. Preference for developable lands within 1500 ft was given a ranking of |
1, between 1500-2500 was given a ranking of 2, and |
beyond 2500 was given a 3. |
T H E E F F E C T S |
O F Climate |
Change |
O N F LO R I DA’ S |
Ocean & |
Coastal |
R E S O U R C E S |
A SPECIAL REPORT TO |
THE FLORIDA ENERGY |
AND CLIMATE |
COMMISSION AND THE |
PEOPLE OF FLORIDA |
Tallahassee, Florida |
It is widely accepted that human activities can impact global |
climate patterns. While there are legitimate disagreements |
among scientists on the nature, magnitude, and impact of these |
changes, the potential risks to Florida’s natural resources and |
our economy compel us to seek a thorough understanding of |
possible impacts and to provide current and future generations |
with the information necessary to adjust to them. |
Florida Oceans and Coastal Council. Revised June 2009. The effects of climate change on Florida’s ocean and coastal |
resources. A special report to the Florida Energy and Climate Commission and the people of Florida. Tallahassee, FL. 34 pp. |
Photos on front and back cover courtesy of DEP, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems; Paige Gill; Dave Gilliam; NASA; |
Guy Weeks & istockphoto.com. |
ii |
Table of Contents |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iv |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY vi |
Why This Report Was Written vi |
Global Climate Change and Florida vi |
The LongTerm Solution viii |
About the Florida Oceans and Coastal Council viii |
2008–2009 Council Accomplishments ix |
I. INTRODUCTION 1 |
Why Floridians Should Care about Climate Change 1 |
What Is Climate Change? 2 |
Principal “Drivers” of Climate Change and How They Will Affect Florida 3 |
Research Priorities 4 |
II. INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE: THE 2007 REPORT SUMMARY 5 |
III. CLIMATE CHANGE AND FLORIDA’S INFRASTRUCTURE, HUMAN HEALTH, |
AND ECONOMY 6 |
Infrastructure Impacts 6 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.