arg_1
stringlengths
4
5.08k
round_1
float64
2
8
ann_1
float64
1
2
arg_2
stringlengths
8
2.19k
round_2
float64
1
7
ann_2
float64
1
2
annotation_name
stringclasses
131 values
is_attacks
int64
0
1
However, there are some important issues that need to be addressed: The novelty of the study should be clearly stated in the Introduction section after the objectives are formulated.
null
null
Although this manuscript is about the application of proximal remote sensing technology to the prediction of soil properties in mountainous areas, the research focus of this manuscript is not prominent, and the conclusions drawn are not very clear.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
is not in-depth, and the analysis of model accuracy is rarely involved in the discussion.
null
null
Line 264: “…, and hence parent material.” It’s not clear here.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Line 233: It’s usually written as “Results and discussion”.
null
null
Response to Reviewer ≠1 comment Many thanks for your response.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Authors should report the detection limits and the recovery of the analytic methods used, along with and the standard solutions for the calibration of the instruments.
null
null
Line 191, 365: “…with different gaps and segment sizes.” “…with gap segment size of…”.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Although this manuscript is about the application of proximal remote sensing technology to the prediction of soil properties in mountainous areas, the research focus of this manuscript is not prominent, and the conclusions drawn are not very clear.
null
null
Lines 490-491: “Unlikely, a weakly represented VIP peak centered at ~850 nm was a significant predictor for the Cd content.” The meaning of this sentence is not clear, and it is a little strange.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
In other words, the manuscript feels like a lot of work has been done, but it doesn't specify what the important conclusions and innovations are.
null
null
The introduction part can highlight the key points and innovations of this paper.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Please pay attention to the singular and plural in the sentence.
null
null
Readers may be more interested in your analysis and interpretation.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Please pay attention to the singular and plural in the sentence.
null
null
In addition, it needs support with more and more up-to-date recent articles.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Readers may be more interested in your analysis and interpretation.
null
null
Response to Reviewer 1 comment Comments and Suggestions for Authors The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible 2 and near-infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural 3 land, the Caucasus Mountains” is scientifically interesting and original.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Some specific comments: The abstract could be more concise.
null
null
It undoubtedly increases your experimental workload, and you do not explain it later.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
What does the controlled laboratory environment you describe look like?
null
null
However, there are some issues that need to be resolved before this manuscript can be considered for publication.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
There are 114 soil samples in this study, what is the basis for grouping by 88/26 (77.2%/22.8%)?
null
null
It is not clear how the 12 spectra were obtained here.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
It is recommended that the number of digits after the decimal point for the value of the correlation coefficient throughout the text be consistent.
null
null
Attention should be paid to the number of decimal places in all numbers throughout the text.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Authors should report the detection limits and the recovery of the analytic methods used, along with and the standard solutions for the calibration of the instruments.
null
null
Response to Reviewer 2 comment On behalf of the co-authors, I am thankful for your valuable comments which helped us to improve the quality of this study.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Reference to formal analytical methods must be made in a scientific manner.
null
null
It is also not clear how 50 spectra were obtained.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
However, there are some important issues that need to be addressed:
null
null
is not in-depth, and the analysis of model accuracy is rarely involved in the discussion.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
It contains new Table 2, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1.
null
null
Note the singular and plural in the sentence.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Reference to formal analytical methods must be made in a scientific manner.
null
null
Authors should report the detection limits and the recovery of the analytic methods used, along with and the standard solutions for the calibration of the instruments.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
It would be wise to give more international flavor in the sections of Introduction and Discussion.
null
null
Modified content should be marked in the revised manuscript for easy review by reviewers.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
is not in-depth, and the analysis of model accuracy is rarely involved in the discussion.
null
null
The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible and near infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural land, the Caucasus Mountains” aims to evaluate the potential of VIS-NIR spectroscopy and PLSR modeling to predict M3 extractable elements (Ca, Mg, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, P, Pb, Mn, and Zn) in a representative test area of Caucasus Mountains.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Line 191, 365: “…with different gaps and segment sizes.” “…with gap segment size of…”.
null
null
The spectral absorption characteristics near 1400, 1900, and 2200 nm have their corresponding influencing factors.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
In addition, partial correlation analysis (e.g., Cheng et al., 2019) could be helpful and bring more insights given the fact that soil spectra are simultaneously influenced by several soil properties (e.g., SOM and Iron oxide).
null
null
The conclusion is too long and does not highlight the key results.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
The definite article “the” is missing in many places in the whole article.
null
null
Line 135: “impairment water resources” Is this expression appropriate?
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Some specific comments: The abstract could be more concise.
null
null
It is recommended that the number of digits after the decimal point for the value of the correlation coefficient throughout the text be consistent.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
However, there are some important issues that need to be addressed:
null
null
Line 243: “(pH, temperature, precipitation)” should not be placed after the word elevation.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Response to Reviewer 1 comment Comments and Suggestions for Authors The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible 2 and near-infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural 3 land, the Caucasus Mountains” is scientifically interesting and original.
null
null
The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible 2 and near-infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural 3 land, the Caucasus Mountains” is scientifically interesting and original.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Author Response "Please see the attachment" Author Response File: Author Response.docx
null
null
Response to Reviewer 1 comment Comments and Suggestions for Authors The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible 2 and near-infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural 3 land, the Caucasus Mountains” is scientifically interesting and original.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
prediction mechanism, prediction accuracy, etc.)
null
null
The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible and near infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural land, the Caucasus Mountains” aims to evaluate the potential of VIS-NIR spectroscopy and PLSR modeling to predict M3 extractable elements (Ca, Mg, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, P, Pb, Mn, and Zn) in a representative test area of Caucasus Mountains.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
My major concerns: This manuscript attempts to integrate different preprocessing methods (8 kinds), sample grouping designs (88/26, 75%/25%), and soil spectral data to predict 15 soil properties by building PLSR models.
null
null
Although this manuscript is about the application of proximal remote sensing technology to the prediction of soil properties in mountainous areas, the research focus of this manuscript is not prominent, and the conclusions drawn are not very clear.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Line 233: It’s usually written as “Results and discussion”.
null
null
Response to Reviewer 1 comment Comments and Suggestions for Authors The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible and near infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural land, the Caucasus Mountains” aims to evaluate the potential of VIS-NIR spectroscopy and PLSR modeling to predict M3 extractable elements (Ca, Mg, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, P, Pb, Mn, and Zn) in a representative test area of Caucasus Mountains.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
It is recommended that the number of digits after the decimal point for the value of the correlation coefficient throughout the text be consistent.
null
null
Line 243: “(pH, temperature, precipitation)” should not be placed after the word elevation.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Response to Reviewer 2 comment On behalf of the co-authors, I am thankful for your valuable comments which helped us to improve the quality of this study.
null
null
Response to Reviewer 1 comment Comments and Suggestions for Authors The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible 2 and near-infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural 3 land, the Caucasus Mountains” is scientifically interesting and original.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Line 347: “different pattern” should be “different patterns”.
null
null
My major concerns: This manuscript attempts to integrate different preprocessing methods (8 kinds), sample grouping designs (88/26, 75%/25%), and soil spectral data to predict 15 soil properties by building PLSR models.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Line 191, 365: “…with different gaps and segment sizes.” “…with gap segment size of…”.
null
null
Author Response Please see the attachment Author Response File: Author Response.docx
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Should the writing of the results and discussion sections be separated?
null
null
What does the controlled laboratory environment you describe look like?
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
Table 1: The pH values are different from those in the previous version.
null
null
is not in-depth, and the analysis of model accuracy is rarely involved in the discussion.
null
null
land11030363_makarova
0
In addition, partial correlation analysis (e.g., Cheng et al., 2019) could be helpful and bring more insights given the fact that soil spectra are simultaneously influenced by several soil properties (e.g., SOM and Iron oxide).
null
null
Although this manuscript is about the application of proximal remote sensing technology to the prediction of soil properties in mountainous areas, the research focus of this manuscript is not prominent, and the conclusions drawn are not very clear.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Modified content should be marked in the revised manuscript for easy review by reviewers.
null
null
Line 909: “c, f, f, a” should be superscripts, indicating the author's work unit.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Lines 456-457: What does this sentence do here?
null
null
(Line: 244-249) Line 174: “…resulting in 12 spectra”.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Response to Reviewer 1 comment Comments and Suggestions for Authors The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible 2 and near-infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural 3 land, the Caucasus Mountains” is scientifically interesting and original.
null
null
The introduction part can highlight the key points and innovations of this paper.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible and near infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural land, the Caucasus Mountains” aims to evaluate the potential of VIS-NIR spectroscopy and PLSR modeling to predict M3 extractable elements (Ca, Mg, Cd, Cu, Fe, K, P, Pb, Mn, and Zn) in a representative test area of Caucasus Mountains.
null
null
Line 135: “impairment water resources” Is this expression appropriate?
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible 2 and near-infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural 3 land, the Caucasus Mountains” is scientifically interesting and original.
null
null
Due to the separating the Results and Discussion section, overlapping of some comments made by reviewers and associated changes, all the text of the manuscript was modified.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Line 135: “impairment water resources” Is this expression appropriate?
null
null
However, there are some important issues that need to be addressed:
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Line 264: “…CaCO3 and Fe),” Where is the left parenthesis?
null
null
In addition, it needs support with more and more up-to-date recent articles.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
It is not clear how the 12 spectra were obtained here.
null
null
During the discussion, the reasons behind the experimental results should be analyzed, not only from the correlation between the sample data but also cannot be explained by relying too much on the VIP score curve.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Due to the separating the Results and Discussion section, overlapping of some comments made by reviewers and associated changes, all the text of the manuscript was modified.
null
null
Line;252-259 Line 176: “…resulted 50 spectra…”.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Line 191, 365: “…with different gaps and segment sizes.” “…with gap segment size of…”.
null
null
Conclusions of the study was modified to show its practical outcomes for the local and international readers The “Introduction section” should be reworked, highlighting the relevance of this topic worldwide.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Readers may be more interested in your analysis and interpretation.
null
null
It is also not clear how 50 spectra were obtained.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Author Response Please see the attachment Author Response File: Author Response.docx
null
null
I suggest the following: Soil parameters affecting the levels of potentially harmful metals in Thessaly area, Greece: a robust quadratic regression approach of soil pollution prediction, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14673-0 Response: Thanks.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
In addition, partial correlation analysis (e.g., Cheng et al., 2019) could be helpful and bring more insights given the fact that soil spectra are simultaneously influenced by several soil properties (e.g., SOM and Iron oxide).
null
null
(Line: 244-249) Line 174: “…resulting in 12 spectra”.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
The definite article “the” is missing in many places in the whole article.
null
null
Modified content should be marked in the revised manuscript for easy review by reviewers.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
There are 114 soil samples in this study, what is the basis for grouping by 88/26 (77.2%/22.8%)?
null
null
Table 1: The pH values are different from those in the previous version.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
The writing language used must be different from the way an analyst mentions it in the lab.
null
null
Modified content should be marked in the revised manuscript for easy review by reviewers.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Note the singular and plural in the sentence.
null
null
is not in-depth, and the analysis of model accuracy is rarely involved in the discussion.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
“Materials & Method" section: a) There is not adequate information regarding quality control of the chemical analyses.
null
null
Line 347: “different pattern” should be “different patterns”.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Especially in the results and discussion section, most of the content is to state the experimental results (correlation of data), while the discussion (eg.
null
null
Lines 145-146: “, soil reaction (pH) in 1:1 soil to KCl solution” is not clearly expressed.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Author Response "Please see the attachment" Author Response File: Author Response.docx
null
null
As far as I know, most articles use only one moving window size.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Please pay attention to the singular and plural in the sentence.
null
null
Line 191, 365: “…with different gaps and segment sizes.” “…with gap segment size of…”.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
7) Conclusions was modified to show its practical outcomes for the local and international readers.
null
null
Line 233: It’s usually written as “Results and discussion”.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Too many parentheses are used in the essay, which is not recommended in writing.
null
null
(Line: 244-249) Line 174: “…resulting in 12 spectra”.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
In addition, partial correlation analysis (e.g., Cheng et al., 2019) could be helpful and bring more insights given the fact that soil spectra are simultaneously influenced by several soil properties (e.g., SOM and Iron oxide).
null
null
Author Response "Please see the attachment" Author Response File: Author Response.docx
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
c) Lines 125-135: There should be bibliographic references for the specific methods and their official name should be mentioned.
null
null
However, there are some issues that need to be resolved before this manuscript can be considered for publication.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Line 347: “different pattern” should be “different patterns”.
null
null
Line;252-259 Line 176: “…resulted 50 spectra…”.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
(Line: 206-207) Lines 163-164: “…were conducted under a controlled laboratory environment.” Can you explain this sentence?
null
null
Some specific comments: The abstract could be more concise.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Is the number of samples sufficient for the purpose of the research?
null
null
Response to Reviewer 2 comment On behalf of the co-authors, I am thankful for your valuable comments which helped us to improve the quality of this study.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
The introduction part can highlight the key points and innovations of this paper.
null
null
However, there are some issues that need to be resolved before this manuscript can be considered for publication.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
It undoubtedly increases your experimental workload, and you do not explain it later.
null
null
Line 264: “…CaCO3 and Fe),” Where is the left parenthesis?
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Due to the separating the Results and Discussion section, overlapping of some comments made by reviewers and associated changes, all the text of the manuscript was modified.
null
null
The spectral absorption characteristics near 1400, 1900, and 2200 nm have their corresponding influencing factors.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Table 1: The pH values are different from those in the previous version.
null
null
Some specific comments: The abstract could be more concise.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Line 233: It’s usually written as “Results and discussion”.
null
null
Author Response Please see the attachment Author Response File: Author Response.docx
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Response to Reviewer 1 comment Comments and Suggestions for Authors The manuscript entitled “Determination of Mehlich 3 extractable elements with visible 2 and near-infrared spectroscopy in a mountainous agricultural 3 land, the Caucasus Mountains” is scientifically interesting and original.
null
null
Modified content should be marked in the revised manuscript for easy review by reviewers.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Table 1: The pH values are different from those in the previous version.
null
null
The introduction part can highlight the key points and innovations of this paper.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Line 264: “…CaCO3 and Fe),” Where is the left parenthesis?
null
null
I suggest the following: Soil parameters affecting the levels of potentially harmful metals in Thessaly area, Greece: a robust quadratic regression approach of soil pollution prediction, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14673-0 Response: Thanks.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Table 1: The pH values are different from those in the previous version.
null
null
Line 191, 365: “…with different gaps and segment sizes.” “…with gap segment size of…”.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
7) Conclusions was modified to show its practical outcomes for the local and international readers.
null
null
Line 909: “c, f, f, a” should be superscripts, indicating the author's work unit.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Lines 353-354, 374: “Savitzky-Golay 1st derivative…” “Savitzky-Golay 2nd derivatives” This is a very confusing way to write it.
null
null
(Line: 206-207) Lines 163-164: “…were conducted under a controlled laboratory environment.” Can you explain this sentence?
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Conclusions of the study was modified to show its practical outcomes for the local and international readers The “Introduction section” should be reworked, highlighting the relevance of this topic worldwide.
null
null
Line 347: “different pattern” should be “different patterns”.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
Some specific comments: The abstract could be more concise.
null
null
Lines 281, 249: Why did you use Spearman's Rho correlation coefficients earlier and Pearson correlation coefficients here?
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
The definite article “the” is missing in many places in the whole article.
null
null
Authors should report the detection limits and the recovery of the analytic methods used, along with and the standard solutions for the calibration of the instruments.
null
null
land11030363_perova
0
***************************************************************************** Reviewer 1 (R1):
null
null
However, the single numbers do not sum up to 303 but rather to 310 (13+74+220+3=310).
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
Authors’ response: Thank you for pointing this out.
null
null
Authors’ response: We have revised the sentence; see section 5.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
The authors of this paper examined whether sociodemographic as well as health-related differences between COVID-19 patients with and without long COVID could be observed.
null
null
(2) The next major issue targets the interpretation of interaction effects.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
I know, there were 7 missing values within the 310.
null
null
The authors did a great job, improved their manuscript according to my suggestions, and responded to all my questions adequately.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
Hence, I urge the authors not to mislead readers and to re-write these sections.
null
null
The authors did a great job, improved their manuscript according to my suggestions, and responded to all my questions adequately.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
People who have infected with COVID-19 sometimes report long lasting COVID symptoms like the loss of taste and smell.
null
null
They found no sociodemographic differences between both groups (i.e., long COVID vs. no long COVID) but, however, observed differences on three health-related outcomes (psychological distress, fatigue, and perceived stress).
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
The authors admit that, line 367, younger people were overrepresented, but to me, it was that older persons, especially over age 70, who were somehow missed in the survey sampling process.
null
null
Author Response We thank the reviewers for their guidance on this manuscript.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
2) Table 1 (page 3, line 137): I detected an error in the third column (“COVID-19 infection”).
null
null
The authors did a great job, improved their manuscript according to my suggestions, and responded to all my questions adequately.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
In addition, the authors introduced an interaction effect between ´long COVID (yes/no) and gener (men/women) and found that men reported significantly higher psychological distress and higher fatigue than women but not for perceived stress.
null
null
***************************************************************************** Reviewer 1 (R1):
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
The authors consider a number of factors associated with long COVID and psychological symptoms.
null
null
Long COVID breaks that pattern - you get sick and stay sick.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
However, this table is still wrong, it must be 310 and not 303.
null
null
Please use a consistent writing style throughout the whole manuscript.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
Honestly, there is no empirical evidence that there is an association between female gender and long COVID, there was no significant difference observed between men and women (p=0.05).
null
null
Please use a consistent writing style throughout the whole manuscript.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
They found no sociodemographic differences between both groups (i.e., long COVID vs. no long COVID) but, however, observed differences on three health-related outcomes (psychological distress, fatigue, and perceived stress).
null
null
In addition, the authors introduced an interaction effect between ´long COVID (yes/no) and gener (men/women) and found that men reported significantly higher psychological distress and higher fatigue than women but not for perceived stress.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
People would get really irritated and discouraged by such a situation.
null
null
**************************************************************************** Reviewer 3 (R3): The reviewed paper deals with the COVID pandemic, especially with the “long COVID” phenomenon.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
However, this table is still wrong, it must be 310 and not 303.
null
null
However, this table is still wrong, it must be 310 and not 303.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
However, the single numbers do not sum up to 303 but rather to 310 (13+74+220+3=310).
null
null
Hence, I urge the authors not to mislead readers and to re-write these sections.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
Honestly, there is no empirical evidence that there is an association between female gender and long COVID, there was no significant difference observed between men and women (p=0.05).
null
null
Please repeat this procedure for “PSS-10” (see page 4, line 185), i.e.
null
null
life12060901_makarova
0
R3: Table 3, Table 4, and Table 5: The authors use a very inconsistent style of bold.
null
null
However, what I disliked was the interpretation and discussion of the empirical results.
null
null
life12060901_perova
0
Authors’ response: Thank you for the kind words.
null
null
We have corrected the manuscript according to this guidance.
null
null
life12060901_perova
0
R3: However, I see several issues with the ending of this paper.
null
null
Psychological distress is the latent construct which is measured with the instrument GHQ.
null
null
life12060901_perova
0
The authors did a cross-sectional online survey with a total sample of 1649 adults across four countries (Norway, UK, USA, and Australia).
null
null
Frankly speaking, the authors are overselling their results.
null
null
life12060901_perova
0